Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-09-2002 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 9,2002,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet • located on the counter near the sign in sheet. ROLL CALL TIMO CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approve/Amend APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 2. Regular Council Meeting of August 26,2002 SEP 0 9 2002 CITY ORONO PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS • Irene Silber, Representative PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS • Dave Rahn, RepresentaUve PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 3. #02-2755 Long Lake Fire Station - City of Orono, 340 Willow Drive North - Class III Subdivision • Final Plat Approval - Resolution 4. #02-2782 Professional Properties of Orono, 2765 Kelley Parkway - Revised Concept Plan - Resolution 5. Marina Licenses MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR'S REPORT CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 6. Adopt 2003 Tax Levy and Budget - Resolutions 7. Selection of Dates for Truth in Taxation Hearings 8. Pay Requests - Long l ake Fire Station 8a. Miscellaneous Equipment - Fire Station 9. Fire Station Site Agreement 10. Mn/DOT Request for Right-of-Entry for Highway 12 Project 11. Police Department Vehicle Replacement 12. Request to Dispose of 1997 Crown Victoria Squad Car 13. Metropolitan Airports Conunission Assistance Agreement 14. Amend Program for Deferment of Special Assessments for Persons 65 Years of Age or Older Resolution 15. Well Agreement with Ed Miller 16. North Arm Lane Paving Project - Solicit Quotations • Resolution tmti 1 AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 9,2002,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA 16a. Always Remember 9*11 Day - Proclamation 16b. Emergency Shoreline Repair Policy 16c. City Administrator Update Report 1) Plymouth Lake Water Oveiilow 2) Work Sessions CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 17. LICENSES Special Event Permits * 18. BILLS UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 09/07- 09/09- 09/09- 09/10- 09/10- 09/12- 09/16- 09/23- City Offices Open for Absentee Voting, 10:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. City Offices Open for Absentee Voting until 5:00 p.m. Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. PRIMARY ELECTION, Tuesday. 7:00 A.M. - 8:00 P.M. Candidate Filing Closes for November S General Election, 5:00 p.m. Joint Work Session, Thursday, 5:30 p.m. Planning Commission, 6:30 p.m. Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 10/07 - Park Commission, 7:15 p.m. 10/14 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 10/18- Planning Commission, 6:30 p.m. 10/25 - Council Meeting, 7:90 p.m. Public Attendance Meeting D ate 9- ^-0<^ ^ Council □ Planning Commission □ Park Commission □ O ther Please nLLouTTHE information requested BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. ... 1 L.. J ^^NUTESOFTHE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 26,2002 7:00 o*clock p.m.SfP 0 9 ciryoFoftw..^ ROLL The Council met on the above mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Barbara Peterson; Council Members Bob Sansevere, Jim Murphy, Jim White, and Jay Nygard; City Attorney Thomas Barrett; Representing staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, Planning Director Mike Gaffron, Zoning Administrators Paul Weinberger and Wendy Bottenberg, Acting City Engineer Glen Cook, Public Service Director Greg Gappa, and Recorder Kristi Anderson. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:02 P.M. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approve/Amend Items 7, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 21 were added to the Consent Agenda. Item 2 was removed. Murphy moved. White seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2. Regular Council Meeting of August 12,2002 White asked to remove paragraph 9, on page 12, having not made the statement. White moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of August 12,2002 as amended. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0, and Mayor Peterson abstaining. PRESENTATION 3. Legacy Foundation Terry Forbord, of the Legacy Foundation, gave a brief presentation regarding the vision and mission of the Foundation. He explained that, although the history of the Lake Minnetonka area is one of small communities with multiple political boundaries, the Legacy Foundation was organized in an eCfoit to supercede those boundaries in an effort to effecniate change. Mr. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 26,2002 7:00 o’clock p.m. (Legacy Foundation, Continued) IS faced with the challenge to make sure that eveiy endeavor it creates is consistent with the heritage of the area and preserves the assets the area has to offer. Mr. Fortord sUted th^the Foundation selected the restoration of the Excelsior Commons as its first project. Inw effort to recreate and repair the property, the Foundation has proposed to facades for the restrooms and concessions buildings which have fallen into disrepair. He pointed out that each building on the site is in need of reflectiVe^rtl^^^^ ^ **** Foundation’s goal is to create characteristic architecture Ihl* endorsed the project by Resolution and both the Miimesota Orchwtra and Children’s Theatre have contacted them to play there. Future potential projects include a trail corridor along County Road 19. Murphy inquired who would manage the Commons project when complete. Since the Foundation raises its funds fixim private sources, the plans usually include additional festo'rinfLTr '"“ny private citizens interested irl Nygari expressed interest in talking further about the trail for County Road 19 He plan, as in the example of the Dakota rail trails. proposca “■«!<'« WnBelf . bke area rate Forbord indicated that they are actively sedcing and welcome donations. ! 1 * 1 1 f I }n \ MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 26,2002 7:00 o ’clock pm 4. 2001 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report - Ken Malloy Ken Malloy, of the City’s auditing fimi, accompanied by Finance Director Tom Kuehn, presented an overview of the 2001 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Malloy stated that the goal during the April/May review period was to provide a clean and unqualified opinion, test internal controls, and compliance issues. He was pleased to report no finings, which is an ideal situation. He had one concern, that the City had not yet obtained certificates fiom each of its brokers who handle investing for the City, which should be provided on an aimual basis. With regard to the Management Report, Malloy explained that p.1-2 summarized legislation for 2001, however, due to government aid and levies, there would be many changes next year. The upcoming tax incremental financing will be a new area for Orono and Malloy cautioned the City to oversee that area carefully, as well as, the use of electronic fund transfers and credit cards. Malloy explained that page 3 of the Management Report referred to property taxes and reform, while p. 4 reflected changes in market values, providing a unique profile with the types of properties in Orono; p.S contained the property tax rates; p.6 a government funds overview compared to statewide averages; p.7 showed the intergovernmental charges for services, reflecting additional revenue offset for public safety expenditures. White acknowledged that the Park budget is below the state average. Malloy stated that, in general, Orono is close to statewide averages on what is spent, however, each City can allocate costs differently, which could explain the park balance. He felt that SI.6 million represented a good fund balance in the General Fund; especially, in light of the fact tax revenues only come in twice a year. He did caution the City that natural disasters could deplete these balances rather quickly. Malloy continued with p.lO, depicting General Fund revenue, from which half the revenue is obtained via taxes and the other half firom other sources, which has been level for virtually 10 years. Page 11 reflected expenditure trends, including utility funds, general fund, water and sewer funds, etc. He indicated that a SI million Water Fund balance for repair and improvements was available, as was a Sewer-Operating Fund balance of SI.7 million. While on p.l4, Malloy pointed out, the City struggled, as did other municipalities, with regard to Golf Course operating revenues. PAGE 3 of 22 1 i MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 26,2002 7:00 o'clock p.m. (2001 Comprehensive Annual Report^ Continued) In closing, Malloy reminded the Council that by December 31,2004 the City of Orono will have to implement the restructuring of their financial statements to reflect more of a commercial enteiprise type presentation. Malloy indicated that over the next few years, they will be attempting to help municipalities plan out the process, which will be an eimnnous task for communitin* finance staff, and he cautioned the City to allow adequate resources for staff to prepare for it. Malloy stated that, overall, things in Orono are in good order and the City uses conservative accounting practices. Murphy asked what new fixed assets would be considered for depreciation under the new sj^tem. Kuehn stated that streets and buildings would be new. Murphy asked what impact this would have on the 2003 budget. Malloy stated that these entity wide statements would be examined by outside users. He indicated that it would be hard to predict the end result until the process begins. ^te stated that, from the report, Orono seems to be a high value, low tax City which the Council tries to keep consistent. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Rick Meyers, Representative decorations^ He stated that, similar to the Ugacy Foundation, the Park Commission strives for hM b^m advertising for bids for Hackbeny Park White complimented Meyers on his efforts for the Dog Days celebration. Murphy suggested separating it from Com Days by spreading the events out. Meyers stated that next year the two events wouldn’t conflict. PAGE 4 of 22 p 4 : fi irr 1 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 26,2002 7:00 o’clock pm PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Mark Frilzler, Representative Fritzler reported that the Planning Commission has had a series of full agendas, some of which will be addressed at this evening’s Council meeting. He indicated that the Commission has made a concerted effort to be helpful in getting people to revise their plans. White complimented the Conunission, stating their let's work together attitude is paying off. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were none. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (#5) #02-2782 Orono Professional Properties, 2765 Kelley Parkway - Revised Concept Plan Dr. Karl Berg, Dr. Bill Kotteman, Dr. Eberts, and Bob Ritter, Applicants representing Professional Properties of Orono, were present. Gaffron explained that since receiving Concept Plan approval per City Council Resolution No. 4823 on June 10,2002, the applicants have continued to revise the site plan, whereas a number of the changes proposed do not change the use of the site they do significantly affect the parking layout, access location, site circulation, building size and orientation, etc. which staff concluded require a Revised Concept Plan review and approval. The Applicants also advised the City that they have signed a purchase agreement to acquire the adjacent 2.5 acre parcel to the east, which in the Revised Concept Plan indicates the potential foi additional parking on that site as well as shared access to Kelley Parkway. Gafiron continued that, the latest issue with the purchase is that the applicants’ environmental consultant has suggested that the site may contain small pockets of defined wetlands, although not originally mapped on the site. Gaffron reported that, John Smythe, the City wetland delineator, indicated that small pockets of wetland, approximately 1/10 of an acre exist at the center of the property. He has suggested that the City proceed with a complete delineation of the site to determine the boundaries of the wetland and determine its characteristics to determine the extent of mitigation necessary should the site be developed. The cost of work completed to date by Smythe is approximately $500; Gaffron indicated that the additional work proposed would be an additional $1,000. PAGE 5 of 22 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday. August 26,2002 7:00 o'clock p.m. Ga^n stated that the applicants have suggested the City should be obligated to provide mitigation for the wetland and Council should consider this issue. Gaffixm stated that the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the revised Concept Plan subject to five conditions: 1. Because there has been recent City discussion regarding the possibility of converting the Highway 12 ditch to an urban section with storm sewer, the Planning Commission suggested the Council work with the applicant to escrow funds if necessary to allow construction of the trail along 12 to be delayed until the Highway 12 future section plans are determined. 2. While the Planning Commission favored the lot line rearrangement to allow parking areas proposed on the adjoining lot to be within the Medical Office Property, the applicants have since requested a cross-easement situation, which is allowed in the zoning code. 3. Dumpster enclosure can move to the SE comer of the site to be able to serve both properties. 4. It is critical that landscaping and building design on the SW side of the building be of hieh quality now that the back of the building faces the 12/OCB intersecUon. Gaflton indicated dial staff found the Revised Concept Plan to contain a number of elements that rnake it supenor to the approved plan, primarily in terms of access to Kelley Parkway and site circulation. He added that a resolution to amend Resolution No. 4828 would be presented to Council at their next meeting, referencing the Revised Concept Plan and incorporating any necessary revised conditions. ^ ^ Muiphy uked if the wetland would create such difficulUes for the appUcant that their construction costs would be forced to go up. ' PAGE 6 of 22 1 ^ : • i * . MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 26.2002 7:00 o'clock p.m. (Mn>2782 ORONO PROFESSIONAL PROPERTIES, Cootinned) Gaffron stated that there was always the need to fill at the site, however, now the t^plicants will be forced to find a suitable location to mitigate the wetland as well. Sansevere asked if staff had any sites in mind for mitigation. Gaffion indicated that they had not made any attempts to look for one yet. Sansevere asked what precedence there might be as to whose responsibility the mitigation should Gaffion stated that, typically, it is the purchaser’s responsibility. If paying full maricet value for the property and needing to mitigate. White asked if there were any signed purchase agreements yet. Gaffion pointed out that he was not involved in the negotiations for the purchase agreement. Sansevere inquired whether the cost of mitigation could be taken into consideration in the negotiation process. White pointed out that deductions are a common practice, if something is discovered that devalues a piece of property. Attorney Barrett pointed out that no purchase agreement exists yet. Sa severe questioned whether the City could give the iq>plicants a break, or a deduct, for the parcel if they were forced to further mitigate. Barrett maintained that the purchaser could make the decision to buy the land if they want to, once they know the facts. White cautioned that if these become take it or leave it negotiations, the City would lose a nice development project that would have set the tone for the entire comer. Mayor Peterson reminded the Council that the applicants approached the City to sell the parcel, it was not for sale at the time. PAGE 7 of 22 ■ Y «■»! if •• Vi -I fi~- \ - i^m fi I • MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Mondiy, August 26,2002 7:00 o’clock p.ia stated tlut the City needs to find out what type of wetland they are dealing with and whether there will be required mitigation. Gaffiron reiterated that, although the proposed plan is superior to the original, there may be a wetland and it needs to be determined if mitigation will be necessary. White asked what the developer timeline was versus the delineation timeline. Gaffion indicated that the delineation would merely take one to two weeks. Ma^r Peterson stated that the Council concurs that this new plan provides a good solution to the earlier concerns. Gaffiron indicat^ that while the cross-easements can be granted, the applicants need to understand the impact this will have on parking for the second parcel. Dr. Berg stated that the building next door would likely be a two-story building with an approximate 10 000-12,000 s^ footprint set parallel to Highwayl2. He maintained that with an additional cut, the flow of traffic would be improved for both sites, and he did not view parking as an issue in the future. ^ * Murphy questioned the timing for the trail proposed for the south end. >' i*Mayor Peterson stated that she would concur with the Planning Commission and support holding off on trail construction until MnDOT and Hennepin County make decisions. * recommendations/conditions. VOTE; Ayes 5, Nays 0. Gaffi-on asked for clarification that the motion included that the City Council found cross- fllTcScafio^^**** staff should proceed with the wetland delineation. Council confirmed PAGE 8 of 22 tiata MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 26,2002 7:00 o'clock p.m. (#6) #02>2789 Dahlstrom Development LLC, 2550 Wayzata Boulevard West - Concept Plan Consideration - RESOLUTION NO. 4852 Steve Johnston, of Landfnrm Designs, and Mr. Dahlstrom, the developer, were present Gaffiron reported that after reviewing the Revised Concept Plan on August 12, the City Council directed staff to draft a Resolution for Concept plan Approval, incorporating staff recommendations. Gaffron noted that five specific issues have been resolved in discussions between staff and the developer, including: 1) Kelley Parkway width and design - 32 ’ wide with 25 on street parking spaces, 5’ concrete sidewalks on both sides of Kelley Parkway behind an 8 ’ boulevard 2) Interior Roadway system width and designs - interior two-way roads will be 22 ’ from face of curb to face of curb, one way roads will be 16 ’ fc/fc, increased to 18 ’ fc/fc as needed 3) Location and design of trails and sidewalks - 8 ’ bituminous trail along Willow Drive and Highway 12 4) Design of main entrance to residential development -140 ’ wide water feature, leaving separation for one-way signage as necessary 5) P^estrian safety in relation to the “roundabout” - incorporating roadway and pedestrian walkway crossing design features and landscaping detail Gaffron noted that staff had incorporated these standards into the proposed resolution. Gaffron further noted that the Resolution consists of two principle sections; the Findings section (pages 2-9) which documents the City’s goals, intent, and policies pertinent to this development, and The Conclusions, Order, and Conditions section (pages 9-19) which establishes the conditions and expectations that the developer must demonstrate are met with the Development Plan submittals. The discussion with the applicants on August 22 also included the topic of affordability, which Gaffron stated would be addressed by the applicant this evening. As a sidebar, Sansevere asked to discuss item #20 from the evening ’s agenda. Authorization for a traffic study, and see this cost incorporated into the proposal. Saitsevere argued that if it were not for this development, the City would not be conducting a trafhe study at this time at all, thus he felt it was not the City’s responsibility to pay for it. He felt the developer should pay for the study since the affected intersections surround his development. PAGE 9 of 22 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 26.2002 7:00 o'clock p.m. (#02-2789 DAHLSTROM DEVELOPMENT, Continued) ------------------ Johnston stated that the applicant’s position was that, within the City development plans, there would cmf **** ******^ incorporated into it. He questioned how much the study Moorse indicated the shidy would run approximately $9,500. Johnston stated that this would not be a huge issue for them. Miuphy maintained that, personally, he felt the City should take responsibility for conducting more traiiic studies for future planning purposes anyway. White questioned the rationale for piggybacking the cost of the traffic study onto the Dahlstrom development. He felt it unfair to burden them with a responsibility that should be the City’s. M; yor Peterson asked if the study included the entire quadrant or simply their development area. Sa^vere stated that he could understand the developer not wanting to pay for the entire study I f there were things within it that wouldn ’t even impact them. Jolmston indicated that, originally, not knowing the magnitude of the study, the developer had only committed to paying for a portion of the study, however, now knowing the cost, they would be willmg to pay for the entire $9,500. ^ Nygard felt it to be the City’s responsibility to pay for the traffic study in regard to what uhe area was zoned to sup^rt. He believed it to be unfair to burden the developer with the entire cost of the study simply because the City had not executed its due diligence ahead of time. Murphy suggested splitting the cost of the traffic study. Dahlstrom felt that sounded to be a fair alternative. Gappa noted that staff would like to look at the entire corridor, from OCB and Highway 12 on He indicat^ t^s to be a timely study, which would help to develop a clear idea of what OCB Should look like. PAGE 10 of 22 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 26,2002 7:00 o'clock p.ia (#02-2789 DAHLSTROM DEVELOPMENT, Continued) Gaffiron pointed out that Shelly Johnson, of Bonestroo, would be reviewing the impact of the intersections regardless of the development. He reiterated that the timing for the study is excellent with the impending redevelopment of Highway 12. Gaf&on agreed that a split would be reasonable. Mayor Peterson stated that she had reservations, not having seen any designs other than the proposed height element with 40* peaks. She questioned whether the Council is granting a variance for height on p. 5 # 13, to allow for this excessive height. Gaffron stated that, since this is being processed as a PUD, the excess height is not necessarily a variance, and there is little issue with height since the Planning Commission found this location to be one of the only places in Orono able to support this height. Mayor Peterson asked what the proposed treescape for Kelley Parkway would include. Gaffion indicated that the designs had not reached that detail yet, however, the Council could mandate certain elements. With regard to lighting, treescape, or design elements that are not satisfactory to Council, Mayor Peterson reminded the developer that this project would not move forward, even if they were granted concept plan approval this evening. Murphy asked if the correspondence between Moorse and the developer satisfied the City. Moorse indicated that staff and Dahlstrom had discussed affordability, other projects built in the 80 ‘s-90 ’s, and clearly the City found they have experience, however, he vdshed to see information regarding recent developments the developer has been involved with. Murphy questioned the issue of affordability. Moorse stated that Dahlstrom would attempt to make a number of lofts and two story townhomes affordable via different programs or designs. Sansevere asked if the lofts were still approximately $220,000, and whether buy down or subsidy programs would help to offset those costs. PAGE 11 of 22 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 26,2002 7:00 o'clock p.m. (#02-2789 DAHLSTROM DEVELOPMENT, Continued) D^strom indicated that through down sizing some units and altering others, as well as offerinR. Sansevere asked if they had experience with affordable housing in any of their other developments. Dahlstrom indicated they had not. affordable housing, they would prefer that Murphy felt the City and developer would grow together as they progressed, and voiced his cunosity over the non-grocery store parcels, and what would become of them. He stated that there IS much the City does not know, and while he empathized with the developers need to keen his fleeing source quiet as of yet, he was concerned how the financing would proceed. He feared that this beautiful parcel might be bulldozed and stand empty, despite everyone's best efforts to develop it properly. He thanked everyone for their ongoing efforts to resolve these outstanding issues. Dahlstrom stated that he had built residential developments as recent as ‘96 and *98. Mayor Peterson asked if he had anything being built at this time. have any current developments being constructed at this time and h^ been fxused on this project for the good part of a year. He mentioned that he had vast expenence with multi-family housing projects and this proposal is a culmination of a vennu. ,0 bl«u) boU. m«W Mayor Peterson asked if this was Dahlstrom ’s first development of this magnitude. Dahlstrom stated that this would be the first time he has been able to find land to support Hus development and build all three types of housing units, the lifecycle housing. White felt it a great marketing technique to market to varying lifecycles within the development. Wth re^d to affordability, Murphy insisted that everyone has their own opinion of what affordability is and he encouraged Dahlstrom to obuin input from various organizations. n! I J ! ! i i '! i MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 26,2002 7:00 o’clock p.m. (#02-2789 DAHLSTROM DEVELOPMENT, Continued) Mayor Peterson stated that she would decidedly be casting a nay vote based on the density of the proposed development. She felt the basic philosophy of Orono was to offer wide open spaces and found it diflicult to accept as many as 6 units per acre. She stated that she truly appreciated the developer*s efforts to resolve staffs issues. While he could ^plaud Dahlstrom’s efforts to work to provide affordable housing, Sansevere stated that this was not a huge priority to him. Dahlstrom stated that he believed they would be able to achieve affordability within the development. He thanked the City for its efforts over the past many months and many meetings with staff, Plaiming Commission, and Council. Barrett suggested striking paragraph 8, on page 19 of 21, of the Resolution and, as legality suggests, adding to paragraph 6, “additionally, the Council’s rezoning approval will depend on the Council’s evaluation of the financial strengths and organizational capacity of the developer.' Murphy moved, Nygard seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4852, approving Application #02-2789, Dahlstrom Development LLC, 2550 Wayzata Boulevard, Proposed Residential Development - General Concept Plan, with the changes and deletions recommended by the City Attorney, subject to the specific staff recommendations and key Issues discussed. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, with Mayor Peterson casting the single dissenting vote. White reminded Council that the developer had met the required zoning density figures as written in the comprehensive plan. *(#7) #02-2803 - Jeff Martineau on behalf of Cherry Stubbs, 2920 Fox Street - Class II Subdivision - RESOLUTION NO. 4853 Murphy moved, W bite seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4853 approving the preliminary plat for a two-lot subdivision and variances for residence and out buildings on Lot 2 for the property located at 2920 Fox Street, Jeff Martineau on behalf of Cherry Stubbs. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0 *(#8) #02-2811 Daniel and Ruth Parten, 1015 Tonkawa Road • Variance • RESOLUTION NO. 4854 Murphy moved. White seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4854 approving the average lakeshore setback variance to make changes to the lakeside of the residence located at 1015 Tonkawa Road, Daniel and Ruth Parten. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PAGE l3of22 1 Lk MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 26,2002 7:00 o'clock p.m. *(#9) #02-2814 William aad Sandra Keegan, 2707 Walters Port Lane - Variance - RESOLUTION NO. 4855 Murpby moved, White seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4855 approving the side adjacent street setback variance to construct an attached garage for the residence located at 2707 Walters Port Lane, William and Sandra Keegan. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#10) #02-2816 Orono Montessori, 3800 Wayzata Boulevard West - Conditional Use Permit - RESOLUTION NO. 4856 Murphy moved. White seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4856 approving a Conditional Use Permit to operate the Orono Montessori School/Day Care Center on the prooertv located at 3800 Wayzata Boulevard West VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#11) #02-2819 Tim Devries, 2180 Abingdon Way - Conditional Use Permit - RESOLUTION NO. 4857 Jim Robin, Landscape Architect representing the Applicant, was present. Weinberge^xplained that the applicants were requesting a conditional use permit to alter land i excess of 500 cubic y^. The applicants are constructing a tennis court on the property and a conditional use permit is required because the applicant is proposing to move 1,040 cubic yards Weinberger noted that the applicants own the property (Lot 6), Abingdon Glen, and the adjacent vacant property (Lot 5). He pointed out that of the 1,040 cubic yards of fill to be moved, Wroximately 120 cubic yards will be trucked from the site to another location, approximately 500 cubic yards will be tracked to lot 5 and the remaining 420 cubic yards will be used as fill on lot 6 to construct the tennis courts. The fill being tracked to Lot 5 will be used to “correct grade iiregulantics, cover small stumps and debris, and to eliminate an 18-inch difference in grade from the existing driveway on Lot 6 to Lot 5 ”. The tenms court will be located southeast of the residence and meets front and side yard Mtbacks, the 26’ setback from the delineated wetland on the property, and will be 180 ’ from ^ setback is required for non-sewered property. The court will be used as a hockey nnk dunng the winter months. PAGE 14 of 22 ■ CmtfK* 11 r 1 ; I I I 'S i MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 26,2002 7:00 o'clock p.m. (#02-2819 TIM DEVRIES, Continued) 1. The area of Lot S to be filled must be reduced to allow some measure of future flexibility in septic site location should the existing tested sites be disturbed or found unusable. 2. Heavy duty silt fence and other protective measures such as signage be installed around the portion of Lot 5 where fill will be deposited. 3. The delineated non-City protected wetlands on the survey be documented via a notification to be filed in the chain of title, along with the wetland delineation report for future reference. 4. The grading plan must be revised to eliminate any fill within 26’ of the delineated wetland. 5. Property owner shall be advised that the Orono zoning ordinance requires lighting in all instances to be diffused or directed away from the property lines in R Districts. Weinberger noted that the Planning Commission further considered two issues in relation to construction of the tennis court and land alteration. First, with regard to the Wetlands/Septic, the new delineation performed under the more recent WCA rules show that areas now defin^ as wetlands are more extensive on the site than those protected under the 1983 subdivision. Furthermore, the property is serviced by an on-site septic system, which staff has deemed will not be directly affected by the proposed tennis court construction. Second, since the tennis court will be converted to a hockey rink in the winter, the Planning Commission felt consideration should be given to use of shoebox downward cast lighting with diffusers of some sort to reduce the impacts of reflective glare. In addition to the Plaiming Commission recommendation, Weinberger pointed out that staff recommends the area of fill and truck traffic on Lot S be reduced and that the applicants take extra precautions to avoid any disruption within 50’ of tested sites, to allow for future flexibility. He added that the applicant would be required to obtain a Watershed District permit as well. Mr. Robin clarified that the fill on Lot 5 will range from 0 to 18 inches in order to correct irregularities. White asked where the Wilsons live in relation to the proposed courts. Weinberger pointed out that, as the nearest neighbor, the Wilsons live quite a distance across the creek, approximately 500 feet away. Gaffron explained that the Wilsons have concern about the applicant meeting City ordinance, and concern that City ordinances don’t go far enough in their requirements. He added that the lighting recommendation had already been incorporated into a condition of the resolution. Beyond the ordinance, the applicant has suggested that they are sensitive to the lighting issue and propose to be good neighbors. He cautioned the Council that there is nothing in the ordinance about lighting that can be tied to a grading issue. PAGE 15 of22 J MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, Auguat 26,2002 7:00 o'clock p.m. (W2-2819 TIM DEVRIES, Continued) Muiphy su^ested the applicants place the lights on the east side of the property to ensure they face the residents’ own home only. White question^ how intensive a rink they were proposing. As a mere rink for their personal use, he didn’t view this to be a highly competitive style rink. Robin stated that the court would be converted to a backyard rink, which could benefit from further landscaping or plant material to obstruct views. ^te indicated that it was wonderful to hear that the applicant was sensitive to the potential issues with the neighbors and encouraged them to continue to be good neighbors, as the Wilson’s have been active City wide conservationists. Muiphy inquired what the work would mean to Lot 5. Gaffron indicated that nothing would change with regard to the usability of Lot 5. Mooiw questioned whether a condition could be added to the CUP, with regard to lighting, that the City would be allowed to reconsider the permit, if issues with the neighbors arise. Gaffron questioned the legality of adding any condition of this nature to a grading permit. Barrett indicated that this would enter a legal gray area. Murphy moved, Nygard seconded, to adopt Resolution No, 4857, approving a Conditional Use Permit to alter land In excess of 500 cubic yards for the property located at 2190 Abingdon Way, Tim and Gayle Devries, subject to staff recommendations/conditions, with the understanding that the ap|dicant will work to the best of their ability to mitigate the lighting issues with the adjoining neighbors. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Robin asked if the wetland delineation documents would be attached to the chain of title. Gaffron affirmed that the notice of protected wetland would be attached to the chain of title. PAGE 16 of 22 nr MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 26,2002 7:00 o'clock pm PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR’S REPORT (#12) North Arm Lane Paving Project • RESOLUTION NO. 4858 Gappa explained that a Public Hearing was held at the August 12th Council meeting for a possible assessment project for the paving of North Arm Lane. Five of the seven property owners were present and spoke at the hearing. Three were in favor of the project, and since that time, Gappa indicated that he spoke to a sixth resident who was not interested in the project. After several unsuccessful attempts to reach the seventh owner, staff was unable to obtain comment. If the Council believes the North Arm Lane Paving Project to be appropriate and beneficial, Gappa explained that the next step would be to approve the resolution ordering preparation of plans and specifications for the project. Gappa indicated that it would be staffs preference that the project be completed, as North Arm Lane is the only remaining gravel road in Orono. A paved road would require far less maintenance and reduce the amount of time spent patching the poor condition pavement on this road. Mrs. Smith and Mr. Sipprell, North Arm Lane residents, were in attendance. Mayor Peterson asked why Mrs. Smith had referred to the road as a privsUe road. Mrs. Smith indicated that, originally, the road was owned by the Armstrongs who have an easement for the road. Gappa explained that, to his knowledge, the road had been publicly maintained for the past 40 plus years. Gaffron stated that approximately 3 years ago the City obtained the road ROW parcel, which clearly makes this a public road. Sansevere stated that the neighborhood is split 3/3, for and against the paving project, without the final vote being cast from neighbor number 7. He questioned if the gravel maintenance estimates, cited in Mr. Sipprell’s letter, were accurate, four trips a year at an estimated S750. each • S3,000 annually. Gappa stated that the estimate of S750 cost per visit was pretty close to accurate for the only public gravel road in Orono. PAGE 17 of 22 iAubii MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday. August 26,2002 7:00 o’clock pm (NORTH ARM LANE PAVING PROJECT, Condnucd) Mayor Peterson asked how this assessment would affect or increase the property values. Barrett pointed out that property owners could appeal their assessments, however, would likely benefit from the enhancement. Mrs. Smith questioned why the assessment value was divided by 7 straight across the board versus divided proportionately by property tax assessment values. Mayor Peterson pointed out that, like sewer, every unit gets the same assessment. Sansevere inquired if Mrs. Smith would be or was near 65, pointing out that there is a mechanism to defer the entire assessment for people 65 or older who are current property owners. He believed, that if she were able to meet age and income requirements, she might be able to defer payment until sale of the property would occur. Moorse stated that he believed there to be a 5-10 year deferral period with that program. White asked if there were pavement in front of the Smith property already as indicated by Mrs. Smith. Gappa stated that the pavement is in poor shape and would be reclaimed as part of the paving project. Mrs. Smith asked where the water would be deferred as it runs down *he pavement Gsqipa indicated that the water runoff would go to the sides as it does currently. Murphy questioned Dick Armstrong’s opinion or position on the matter, as a resident in the neighborhood. Gappa pointed out that the Passes own the property and did weigh in opposed to the project. While Sansevere felt the road should be paved, he was hesitant since three of the seven were opposed to the idea and the project could pose a hardship for those residents. White indicated that there may never be a consensus, even if paving the road is the right thing and makes the most sense. The current condition of the road costs the City a great deal in maintenance, improving the road will improve property values, and White pointed out that the assessment costs for some of the residents can be deferred. PAGE 18 of 22 ’ I MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 26,2002 7:00 o’clock p.m. (NORTH ARM LANE PAVING PROJECT, ConUnncd) Muiphy stated that there were more reasons to pave the road, than to not, however, he questioned if the City could further reduce the «^st of the assessment since this is the last gravel road in Orono and paving it will save the City money. Sansevere concurred, speculating that if the City saves SI,500 annually by reducing the number of trips to the area, it could in turn likely reduce the cost. Gappa indicated that after bids are collected, this could be addressed during the assessment hearing. Sansevere asked Mrs. Smith if she would be interested in learning more about the deferral program. On a personal note, Murphy added that, as charged with maintaining a private gravel road, he felt the residents would be far letter off with a paved roadway, but suggested the country charm of the area be maintained. Mr. Sipprell pointed out that their postal carriers have expressed concer traveling this roadway under certain weather conditions. Murphy moved. While seconded, to approve Resolution No. 48S8, ordering the preparation of plans and specincations for the North Arm Lane paving project VOTE: Ayes S, Nays 0. Sansevere asked if language should be added to the recommendation with regard to defiaying the costs. Gappa felt the time to address this question would be at the assessment hearing. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Mayor Peterson asked how the City was progressing with the mediation between Joel Walvatne and Cliff Otten. Moorse indicated diat the mediators would be contacting both parties within the next few days to begin the mediation process. Mayor Peterson pointed out that she would be late to the September 9,2002 City Council meeting, and asked Sansevere to begin the meeting without her. FAGEI9of22 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 26.2002 7:00 o’clock pm (Mayor/Councll Report, Continued) Mayor Peterson will be attending the Mound Fire Board Meeting that night, as well as the upcoming Mound Fire Fighters General Membership Meeting, to deliver accurate figures and facts to the fire fighters, and clear up any misinformation that is going around. Murphy indicated that he, and others of the Fire Committee, plan to attend the Long Lake City Council meeting this week to discuss the RFP and the shared maintenance facility. Sansevere expressed his opinion that a representative of Long Lake should take the leadership role in evaluating the options of locating the Long Lake maintenance facility adjacent to Orono*s maintenance facility. White stated that work needs to be done to accomplish a compromise with Maple Plain as well. Nygard complimented Gappa on his work with the Caroline Avenue residents with regard to the drainage issues. PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTORS REPORT CONTINUED Request for Final Payment - Shoreline/Heritage Sanitary Sewer Project Murphy moved, White seconded, approving the Request for Final Payment, Shorcline/Heritage Sanitary Sewer Project to G.L. Contracting Inc. in the amount of $11,291.96 VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#14) Request for Final Payment • Highwood Road Storm Sewer Project Murphy moved. White seconded, approving the request for Final Payment, Head Property Sanitary Sewer Project to Minncomm Inc. in the amount of $39,755.00 VOTE: Ayes 5, *(#15) Approve Purchase of Golf Course Tee Mower Murphy moved, White seconded, approving the purchase of a replacement tee mower from Greenimage Inc. in the amount of $19,800. to be funded from the year 2002 Golf Course Fund, Capital Equipment Budget. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PAGE 20 of 22 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 26.2002 7:00 o’clock pm CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT *(#16) Pay Request - Loog Lake Fire Station Murphy moved, White secouded, to approve the request for payment in the amount of $4,675J0 to Kirk Program Management, to be funded from the Joint Fire Station Fund. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#17) Application and Certificate for Payment No. 4 - Long Lake Fire Station Murphy moved. White seconded, to approve Application and Certificate for Payment No. 4 from Rochon Corporation in the amount of $357,982.50, to be funded from the Joint Fire Fund. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#18) Appointment of Building Inspector Murphy moved. White seconded, to appoint Bruce Vang to the position of Building Inspector at the Level 2, Step IV rate of $23.34 per hour, effective September 3,2002. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(19) NPDES Guide Plan Payment Authorization Murphy moved. White seconded, to approve the payment of the invoice from the LMC for the development of the NPDES guide plan, in the amount of $5,000.00, and to amend the Stormwater Fund budget to refiect the expenditure. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#20) Authorization for Traffic Study As discussed earlier, Sansevere reiterated his opinion that all intersections are impacted by the Dahlstrom Development project, therefore, they should be responsible for paying for the traffic study and not the City. Murphy contended that 2/3 of what needs studying would need to be addressed whether the development was going in or not. White moved, Nygard seconded, authorizing BRA to move ahead with the sub area transportation study, at a cost not to exceed $9400.00, and to amend the Public Improvement Revolving Fund budget to refiect the expenditure. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PAGE 21 of 22 MINUTES OF THE ORONO cmr council meehno MowUy, Auguit 26,2002 7:00 o ’clock pm CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT Attorney Banett had nothing new to report. *(#21) LICENSES Club Firearm Use Permit 1. Annual Permit for:Park Gun Club 3660 Sixth Avenue North Special Event Permit 1. Applicant; Boyer Building Corporation Event: 2002 Remodelers Showcase Location: 900 Partenwood Road Date: October 11-13.2002 Time: 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Murphy moved. White seconded, to approve all licenses. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#22) BILLS Murphy moved. White seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account VOTE: Ayes S, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT White niovedf Nygard tecoDdedy to odjouro the Orooo City C oudc II Meetiiic of Aiinst 26% 2002 at 9:50 P.M. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. * * ^ ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara Peterson, Mayor PAGE 22 of 22 timG REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION SEP 0 9 2002 Oi I r ur UHOivo Dale: September 4.2002 Item No.3 Department Approval:Adminiilrator Approval: Name: Michael P. Gaflron Title: PUnning Director Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #02-2755 Long Lake Fire Station, 340 Willow Drive North - - Final Plat Approval - Resolution Lbt of Exhibits A • Final Plat Approval Resolution for Adoption B - Final Plat Drawing C - MCWD Standard Covenant Documents Final Plat The final plat drawing for the fire station property has been completed. The plat is named Willowfire Addition. The new public road south of the fire station is designated as Fire Station Drive for platting purposes, although Council can rename the road in the future if it chooses to. Per the preliminary plat approval Resolution No. 4769, the easterly parcel reserved for future use (probably residential in nature per the Comprehensive Plan) is designated on the plat as Outlot A. Outlot A will remain in the ownership of the City of Orono but cannot be developed until it is replatted in the future as a buildable Lot. This “outlot” status allows the deferral of Park Fees and Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fees, which would be collected at the time of development. Outlot A is accessed via Fire Station Drive. Also recall that while the stormwater facilites serving Lot 1 are located within Outlot A, those facilities would have to be expanded when Outlot A is developed, as the design did not incorporate capacity for the as yet unknown needs of Outlot A. The Park Fee was waived for Lot 1 upon which the fire station is under construction. The Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fee of SI 3,220 is due for Lot 1, and is intended to be a 50/50 shared cost between Long Lake and Orono. The other outstanding fee due is the S250 final plat fee, also a shared cost. Consultant fees incurred to date are primarily for surveying and plat drawings, expected to total approximately S4.000. Yet to be completed is the execution of covenants to give notice to current and future landowners of obligations and restrictions on the use of the Replacement Wetland and the Impacted Wetland, as well as requiring wetland buffer maintenance, twice-yearly street sweeping, stormwater facility maintenance, and prohibiting use of phosphorus-containing fertilizer. Standard documents provided by the MCWD are attached for your review. 1 . I ! I #02-2755 Long Lake Fire SUtion September 4,2002 Page 2 Staff RccommcndatioB Stair recommends approval of the final plat, to be filed by the City Attorney upon payment of fees and execution of final wetland & stormwater facilities covenants. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt or amend the attached Final Plat Approval resolution. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF WILLOWFIRE ADDITION nLE NO. 02-2755 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota: and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision of a two-lot plat by the City of Orono (hereinafter "the subdividers"); and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet the pertinent standards of the RR-IB, Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District and the intent of the 2000-2020 Orono Community Management Plan (CMP), finding that Lot 1 is of a size and conflguration that would allow its intended use for a municipal fire station, and that Outlot A is of a size, configuration and accessability to allow its potential future development upon replatting for the density of housing guided for this area in the CMP; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed or has agreed to complete all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including; 1.Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 4769, the resolution granting preliminary approval of the Class III subdivision. 2. 3. Dedication on the plat of standard perimeter drainage and utility easements. Provision of drainage calculations for pre- and post-development stormwater quantity and quality conditions, and design of stormwater and drainage improvements and facilities. 4.Designation and dedication of drainage easements over the stormwater pond within the plat. Page 1 of 4 1 i fd 5. 6. Dedication on the plat of public roadway for Willow Drive and Fire Station Drive. Provision of evidence of stormwater management plan ^proval from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, as well as a final wetland delineation report for the property identifying the boundaries of WCA protected wetlands and showing the wetland buffers required by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 7.Execution of covenants over the wetlands and buffer areas advising future property owners of the limitations on the alteration of said features. 8. Payment of the final plat review fee in the amount of $250.00. 9. Payment of the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee for Lot 1 in the amount of $13,220.00. 10. Payment for all engineering and legal consultant costs incurred in processing this subdivisioiL NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Counril uf the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Willowfire Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions: 1.Outlot A is intended for future development. However, no future development of Outlot A shall occur until such time that Outlot A is replatted into one or more Lots. 2.Lot 1 shall be allowed direct access to Willow Drive as well as to the new public road south of Lot 1, per the approved Fire Station site plan. Outlot A shall access the new public road as shown on the preliminary plat drawings. The new public road south of lx>t 1 shall be constructed to City of Orono urban section standards at a width of 28 ’. 3.The Park Dedication requirement for Lot 1 is waived. The Park Dedication requirement for Outlot A is deferred until such future time that Outlot A is developed. Page 2 of 4 I 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. The Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee for Outlet A is deferred until such future time that Outlot A is developed. The standard requirements for Developers Agreement and Financial Security in relation to site improvements for are waived because this is a municipal project. It is the Council’s intent in approving this plat to accommodate the needs of the citizenry of Orono, Long Lake and Medina by providing a site for a new Long Lake Fire Station; however, because of the location of the site in a rural residential neighborhood, it is imperative that the character of that neighborhood be preserved to the greatest extent possible. Ancillary elements of the Fire Station use such as lighting and signage could have negative impacts on the neighborhood if not developed in a subdued, low-key maimer. Therefore, the applicants are advised to work with City staff in ensuring that the lighting, signage and other elements of the Fire Station use are developed in a manner sensitive to the surrounding area. Subdivider shall construct stormwater management improvements in accordance with the plans approved by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Erosion control shall be maintained over all disturbed areas until natural groundcover is restored, adhering to guidelines found in 'Best Management Practices for Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas'. Prior to City release of the plat for filing, applicant shall provide evidence of fee ownership of the property in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, and applicant shall meet any other title requirements as may be required by the City Attorney. Applicant shall provide all documents specified in this resolution in a format acceptable to the City Attorney prior to release of the plat for filing, and shall complete all conditions to the satisfaction of City staff, prior to release of the plat for filing. 10. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with either the Hennepin County Recorder's Office or Registrar of Titles Office on or before March 9,2003 together with a certified original copy of this resolution and executed copies of the easements, deeds and covenants notnl above. Page 3 of 4 I : The iq)proval granted by this resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 9th day of September, 2002. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) )ss. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 9th day of September, 2002 by Barbara Peterson and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 (Above Space is Reserved for Recording Infoimaliony DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS FOR REPLACEMENT WETLAND This Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland (Declaration) is made this____day of_____________, 19 ____by the undersigned Declarant: RECITALS A. The Declarant holds the fee title or perpetual easement on the real property described as follows: [Insert legal description of the smallest parcel of land possible containing the Replacement Wetland.] B. This real property is the site of a Replacement Wetland, as defmed in Minnesota Rules 8420.0110, subp. 40. C. The Declarant is seeking approval of (1) a replacement plan under Minnesota Statutes section 103G.222 and Minnesota Rules 8420.0530 or (2) a bank plan under Minnesota Rules 8420.0740, D. The Replacement Wetland is subject to the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991, as amended, Minnesota Statutes section 103G.222 et seq.. and all other provisions of law that apply to wetlands, except that the exemptions in Miimesota Statutes section 103G.2241 do not apply to the Replacement Wetland, pursuant to Minnesota Rules 8420.01 IS. FORM A Page I of4 1 ii E. The Local Government Unit (LGU) charged with approval of the Replacement or Banking Plan is___________________, whose address is________________________ F. All references in this instrument to Minnesota Statutes and Rules are to the Statutes and Rules currently in effect and as amended or renumbered in the future. RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS The Declarant makes the following declaration of restrictions and covenants for the Replacement Wetland. These restrictions and covenants shall run with the land, and bind Declarant, and Declarant's heirs, successors, and assigns: 1. The Declarant shall maintain a Replacement Wetland of the size and type specified in the replacement plan or bank plan approved by the LGU and on file at the offices of the LGU. Declarant shall not make any use of the Replacement Wetland that would adversely affect the functions or values of the wetland as determined by Minnesota Rules 8420.0S40, subp. 10, and as specified in the replacement plan or bank plan. 2. Declarant shall pay the costs of maintenance, repairs, reconstruction, and replacement of the Replacement Wetland, which the LGU or the State of Minnesota through the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources may deem necessary to comply with the specifications for the Replacement Wetland in the approved replacement plan or bank plan. 3. Declarant grants to the LGU, the State of Minnesota, and the agents and employees of the LGU and the State of Minnesota, reasonable access to the Replacement Wetland for inspection, monitoring, and enforcement purposes. This Declaration grants no access to or entry on the lands described to the general public. 4. Declarant represents that he or she has a fee simple or easement interest in the land on which the Replacement Wetland is or will be located. Declarant represents that he or she FORMA Page 2 of4 w. ■ i » has obtained the consent of all other parties who may have an interest in the land on which die Replacement Wetland is or will be located to the creation of the restrictions and covenants herein, and that, all such parties have agreed in writing to subordinate their interests to these restrictions and covenants, pursuant to the attached Consent and Subordination Agreements). 5. Declarant shall record or file this Declaration, pay all costs associated with recording or filing, and provide proof of recording or filing to the LGU. If this Declaration is given pursuant to a iq>lacement plan, such proof shall be provided to the LGU before proceeding with construction of die Replacement Wetland. FORMA Page 3 of4 iii'liftifiriini'iirn n iRabMiuithin . 6. recorded. These restrictions and covenants shall be unlimited in duration, without being re- 7. If the replacement plan or bank plan approved by the LGU and on file at its offices requires the establishment of areas of permanent vegetative cover, the term 'Replacement Wetland" as used in this Declaration shall also include the required areas of permanent vegetative cover, even if such areas arc not wetlands. All provisions of this Declmtion that apply to the Replacement Wetland shall apply equally to the required areas of permanent vegetative cover. In addition, the Declarant: (a) Shall comply with the applicable requirements of Minnesota Rules 8420.0540, subpart 2.D; (b) Shall, at Declarant! cost, establish and maintain permanent vegetative cover on areas specified in the replacement plan or bank plan for permanent vegetative cover, including any necessary planting and replanting thereof, and other conservation practices, in accordance with the replacement plan or bank plan; (c) Shall not produce agricultural crops on the areas specified in the replacement plan or bank plan; (d) Shall not graze livestock on the areas specified in the replacement plan or bank plan; (e) Shall not place any materials, substances, or other objects, nor erect or construct any type of structure, temporary or permanent, on the areas specified in the replacement plan or bank plan, except as provided in the replacement plan or bank plan; (0 Shall, at Declarant! cost, be responsible for weed control by complying with noxi ous weed control laws and emergency control of pests necessary to protect the public health on the areas specified in the replacement plan or bank plan; and (g) Shall comply with any other requirements or restrictions specified in the replacement plan or bank plan, including, but not limited to, haying, mowing, timber management or other vegetative alterations that do not enhance or would degrade the ecological functions and values of the replacement site or bank site. 8. This Declaration may be modified only by the joint written approval of the LGU and the State of Minnesota through the Mirmesota Boari of Water and Soil Resources. Such modification may include the release of land contained in the legal description above, if it is determined that non-wetland areas have been encumbered by this Declaration, unless the approved replacement plan or bank plan designates these non-wetland areas for establishment of permanent vegetative cover. forma Pa|e4or4 ------- 9. This Declaration may be enforced, at law or in equity, by the LGU, or by the State of Minnesota. The LGU and the State of Minnesota shall be entitled to recover an award of reasonable attomeyb fees from Declarant in any action to enforce this Declaration. Signature of Declarant Signature of Declarant STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF.) This instrument was acknowledged before me on (date) by _ (name(s) of person(s). (Signature of Notarial Officer) (Tide) My commission expires: This instrument drafted by: CNovcnriw. 1991) FOBMA Pate Sore BWSR Deed Fonii Instructions Instructions to LGUs for Use of WCA Deed Forms General Instructions for all three forms: 1. Fofins A, B and C are required by the WCA Rules to give notice to current and future landowners of the Replacement Wetland or the Impacted Wetland (i.e., the wetland that was drained or filled) of obligations and restrictions on the use of the wetland. 2. All of these forms must be signed by the fee owner (including the husband and wife, even if the title is only in one spouse's name) and any other party who is defined as a "Landowner" under the rules who is doing the replacement or draining/filling of the wetland. 3. All of these forms must be notarized and filed with the county recorder’s office in which the wetland is located, so that the obligations and restrictions on the use of the wetland become a pemument part of the land record. Form A: Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland 1. This form will be used most frequently because it is required for a Replacement Wetland when the Landowner seeks LGU approval of the Replacement Plan or Bank Plait The Landowner acknowledges in this Ekclaration that, among other things, he is responsible for maintaining the size and type of the replacement wetland. 2. In addition to Form A, the LGU should require proof of good title, i.e., proof that the Landowner in fact owns the land and that no encumbrances arc on the land which would prevent the creation or restoration of a wetland on that parcel. This is very important! Preferably, proof of good title should be in the form of; Owner's duplicate certificate of title (for Torrens or Registered Property), updated abstract, title insurance policy, or title opinion from an attorney. At a minimum, the LGU must require a deed or certificate of title showing ownership. Landowner’s Affidavit (Form A*1 below), and Consent to Replacement Wetland (Form A-2 below). 3. Although it may seem like a significant burden for landowners to provide this information and for the LGUs to review it, this is essential to protect the replacement wetland. For example, if a mortgage holder ("mortgagee") does not consent to the creation or restoration of the wetland, then a court may find that the mortgagee who forecloses on the property is not subject to the requirements of maintaining the replacement wetland, because the mortgage was granted prior to Ae wetland being created or restored. It may be extremely difficult for the LGU to then go after the original landowner several years later and compel him to find another replacement wetland. Iturn 4. The two supplemental forms below, A-1 and A-2, will help the LGU ensure that the landowner has good title. Form A>1: Affidavit of Landowner(s) This affidavit should be signed by the Landowner to affirm that he is the owner of the property and that there are no mechanics' liens, judgments, delinquent taxes or other encumbrances against the property. This affidavit should be notarized but it need not be filed with the County Recorder. Form A>2: Consent to Replacement Wetland This consent form should be signed by ail parties who have an interest in the Replacement Wetland (e.g., mortgagees, contract for deed vendors or vendees, licensees, lien holders, owners of easements for a drainage system or utility (pipe)line which actually runs through the Replacement Wetland). This consent form should be notarized and filed with the County Recorder. Form B:Declaration of Restrictions for Impacted Wetland Under Agricultural Exemption This form should be signed by a landowner who has obtained an exemption certificate from the LGU under one of the Agricultural Exemptions of WCA (ex. #1,2,4,7,8 and 23). This Declaration prevents the landowner from converting the land to non-agricultural use for 10 years from the date of draining or filling, and also prevents the Impacted Wetland from being restored for replacement credit for the same 10*year period. This form should be notarized and filed with the County Recorder. Form C:Declaration of Restriction for Impacted Wetland on Agricultural Land in County or Watershed Containing Less than 80% Presettlcment Wetlands This form should be signed by the Landowner who has drained or filled a wetland on agricultural land in a county or watershed containing less than 80% presettiement wetlands. The Declaration prevents the Landowner from converting the land to non-agricultural use for 10 years from the date of draining or filling, unless the Impacted Wetland is first replaced at the ratio for non- agricultural land. Biiminic.for (April, I99T) : I 0( Imaintain 3" top margin] DECLARATION THIS DECLARATION ("Declaration") is made this ^ 2000, by ------------------------- [marital status if individuals] day of (''Declarant") in favor of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District a body with powers pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapters 1036 and 103D. RECITALS WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of real properly within the Q'ty of _____________County, Minnesota, platted and legally described as: [legal description] (the "Properly") and no one oUier tlian Declarant [name additional parties executing declaration of Consent and Subordination], has any right title or interest in the Property; and WHEREAS, the Property constitutes the entirety of the land to which Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Permit #_____applies; and WHEREAS, Declarant desires to subject the Property to certain conditions and restrictions imposed by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District as a condition to issuance of their Permit #___for the mutual benefit of (the MCWD and] the owners of the Property. NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant makes this Declaration and hereby declares that this Declaration shall constitute covenants to run with the Property, and further declares that the Property shall be owned, used, occupied, and conveyed subject to the covenants, restrictions, easements, charges and liens set forth in this Declaration, all of which shall be binding on all persons owning or acquiring nwy right title or interest in the Property', and their heirs, successors, personal representatives, and assigns. 1. Wetland Buffer. The wetland buffer, measuring _ feet in width at all points surrounding the wetlands as delineated on the site plan for the Property attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachment A, shall be maintained by Declarant in perpetuity free from mowing or other vegetative disturbance, fertilizer application, yard or other waste disposal, the placement of structures or any other alteration that impedes the function of the buffer in protecting the quality of water in the wetland or buffering flows into the wetland. 2. Street Sweeping. All streets and public ways within the Property shall be swept at least twice each year, in the spring foUowing snowmelt and in the fall after leaf fall. 3. Stormwater Facility Maintenance. The terms of Attachment B, incorporated herein, shall apply to the stormwater management-facilities indicated on Attachment A, identified as follows; (list stormwater management facilities] 4. Non-phosphorus Fertilizer. The use of fertilizers containing phosphorus is prohibited on all or any portion of the Property. Only fertilizers that do not contain phosphorus may be applied thereon. 5. 6. Swales and Pervious Areas. The recitals set forth above are expressly incorporated herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this instrument the day and year first set forth. DECLARANT; By:. [name and representative capacity, if applicable] STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this____day of . 2000, by Notaiy Public This Instrument Was Drafted By: V ATTACHMENT B STORMWATER FACILITY MAINTENANCE These tenns apply to the stormwater facilities constructed pursuant to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit application number____ WHEREAS, application has been made for a pennit from the MCWD pursuant to MCWD Rule N, Stormwater Management; and WHEREAS, the property that is the subject of the permit is legally described in the Declaration into which this Attachment is incorporated, and the facilities on the property to which these maintenance requirements apply are as follows: [description] WHEREAS, MCWD Rule N provides that a maintenance agreement shall be submitted for stormwater treatment ponds, outlet structures for such ponds, culverts, outfall structures and all other stormwater facilities, and that the maintenance agreement shall specify methods, schedule and responsible parties for maintenance and must include at a minimum, the elements contained in the District’s Maintenance Agreement Form. NOW, THEREFORE: 1. The property owner shall inspect the stormwater retention and treatment basin(s) at a minimum of once a year to determine if the basin’s retention and treatment characteristics are adequate. A storage treatment basin will be considered inadequate if sediment has decreased the wet storage volume by Vj of its original design volume. Based on this inspection, if the stormwater basin(s) is identified for sediment cleanout, the property owner shall restore the basin(s) to its original design contours within one ’ year of the inspection date. 2. The property owner shall inspect the grit chambers, sump catch basins, sump manholes, outlet structures, culverts, outfall structures or other stormwater facilities for the project in the spring and fall of each year. The property owner shall remove all sediment and debris during the inspections such that the stormwater facilities operate as designed and permitted. 3. [Other Requirements] 4. Violation of the inspection and/or maintenance provisions of this Agreement is a violation of the MCWD permit for the project for which the MCWD may take action against the property owner. 5. "Propeity owner ” as used in this Attecbment means the owner of the property on which is located the stormwater facility to which the obligations herein apply. 'I V. . ... 1—^ % - ApplicitiM Date: April 16,2002 60-Day Review CipInitiM: Jme iS, 2002 CMce^ Plaa Approval Date: Juae 10,2002 (ReaoiNtiaa No. 4023) CoBcepI Plaa Approval EITcctIve Period: Joae 10,2002 - December 10,2002 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION OOl *•*•••• • o I SEP 0 9 2002 CITY Cir unoi*o Date: September 3,2002 Item No.: ^ Oepartmeat Approval: Administrator Approval: Name: Michael P. Gaffron Title: Planning Direcim Agenda Section: Zoning Item Descriptioo: #02-2782 Professional Properties of Orono, 2765 Kelley Parkway - Proposed Medical Office - Revised Concept Plan Approval - Resolution List of Exhibits A • Resolution B • Request for Wetland Exemption On August 26 Council voted 5-0 to approve the Revised General Concept Plan and directed staff to draft an amendment to the prior approval resolution. The attach^ resolution for adoption incorporates the Planning Commission’s findings and recommendations, with the exception that the use of the adjacent parcel for joint parking is allowed via easement rather than requiring a lot line rearrangement. Appropriate conditions have been included regarding the future development of the trail along Highway 12, the relocation of the dumpster enclosure to serve both parcels, and the quality of building design and landscaping on the facade facing the 12/(X:B intersection. The resolution also incorporates language regarding rezoning of the adjacent 2.5 acre parcel from RR-1 B to B-6 PUD. This will require a separate public hearing because the original hearing did not include the adjacent parcel. However, that parcel is also guided in the CMP for commercial office use and should be rezoned to B-6 PUD to ensure its future use is compatible with the medical office use. Wetland Issue The City Engineer has further reviewed the available airphotos and has requested that MC WD certify the exemption of this site fi^om WCA rules. The request notes that although the site exhibits wetland characteristics this summer, this is due to unusually high rainfall and poor site drainage due to past disturbance. Staff will keep Council posted as this progresses. Wetland delineation will proceed should the exemption not Iw granted. i; {■■ I -------— A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REVISED GENERAL CONCEPT PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2765 KELLEY PARKWAY FILE NO. 02-2782 WHEREAS, Professional Properties of Orono (hereinafter the "applicant") has an interest in property located at 2765 Kelley Parkway within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, Willow Properties Addition, Hennepin County, Miruiesota (hereinafter the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant was granted General Concept Plan Approval for Planned Unit Development of the Property via City Council Resolution No. 4823 on June 10, 2002. Resolution No. 4823 granted conceptual approval for rezoning of the Property from RR- IB. One Family Rural Residential District to B-6/PUD for medical office use of the parcel, and granted General Concept Plan Approval for a 15,000 s.f. one-story medical office building on the Property; and WHEREAS, the applicant has revised the General Concept Plan and has requested City Council approval of the Revised General Concept Plan; and WHEREAS, the revisions to the General Concept Plan include expansion of the proposed medical office building to 16,000 s.f as compared to the 15,000 s.f building initially proposed; reorientation of the building toward Kelley Parkway as compared to its original orientation toward the Highway 12/Old Crystal Bay Road intersection; revision of site traffic circulation and parking layout; and use of the adjacent parcel (legally described as Lot 1. Block 2, City of Orono Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota; hereinafter the “Adjacent Parcel”) for parking and shared access; and WHEREAS, the Orono City Council makes the following findings in regard to Revised General Concept Plan approval: FINDINGS 1. The City Council finds that Findings numbered 1-5 and 7-10 of Resolution No. 4823 remain applicable to the Revised General Concept Plan, and are incorporated herein by reference. Page 1 of 12 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. The proposed medical office building at 16,000 s.f. in area rather than 15,000 s.f. remains at a one story design and retains the same architectural styling as the original plan. The building orientation has been reversed so that its front entrance is facing northeast toward Kelley Parkway rather than southwest toward the intersection of Hwy 12 & Old Crystal Bay Road. Applicants have advised the City that they now have a signed purchase agreement to acquire the 2.5 acre Adjacent Parcel to the east, and the Revised Concept Plan indicates the potential for additional parking on that site as well as a shared access to Kelley Parkway. The easterly entrance to Kelley Parkway in the Revised Concept Plan will be a full access shared entrance with the Adjacent Parcel. This was formerly an “in- only ” access point. It is located directly across from the Orono Police driveway as required by the City to eliminate left-turning conflicts for exiting vehicles. The westerly access from Kelley Parkway will be “in-only ” which provides easy access for patient drop-off and pick-up while providing less of a stacking backup conflict for cars exiting onto westbound Kelley Parkway. The easterly parking lots are connected by two “through” corridors to additional parking on the Adjacent Parcel. Based on applicants’ revised submittal C2.1, required parking is 72 stalls, of which 67 are provided on-site and 5 are provided on the adjacent property to the east. Tlie site plan indicates that a total of 15 stalls are proposed on the Adjacent Parcel to serve this site, due to the applicants’ expectation that a total of 83 stalls are likely necessary to adequately serve their intended use of the building. The revised parking layout appears to meet the appropriate engineering and zoning design standards in terms of stall size, driving lane width, etc. The 2.5 acre Adjacent Parcel for which the applicants have a purchase agreement, is similarly guided in the Orono Community Management Plan for commercial office use and is also currently zoned RR-IB. It would be appropriate for this Adjacent Parcel to be rezoned to B-6/PUD concurrently with rezoning of the property. The Adjacent Parcel should be subject to the same development standards as the property, as they will be guided and zoned identically. Page 2 of 12 9.The applicant has provided revised preliminary plans attached to this resolution as Eihibits A and B including site plan and landscaping plan (both dated 8-5- 02) and revised conceptual building construction plans (dated 8-6-02) which the Council flnds are suflicient to indicate the intent of the developer and the potential impacts of the project. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the Revised General Concept Plan for development of a 16,000 s.f medical office building on Lot 1, Block 1, Willow Properties Addition, subject to the following declarations and conditions; 1.The City of Orono will approve rezoning of the property to B-6 (PUD) as desv‘.ibed herein upon City Council finding of satisfactory completion of the Conditions for Development Plan approval. 2.The City of Orono will approve rezoning of the Adjacent Parcel to B-6 (PUD) as described herein upon City Council flnding of satisfactory completion of the Conditions for Development Plan approval, subject to successful completion of a public hearing by the Planning Commission regarding said rezoning. The Adjacent Parcel may be developed for any permitted or conditional use allowed in the B-6 District, but shall be developed only via the PUD review and approval process. 3. Conditions for Development Plan Approval are as follows; Development Standards and General Conditions. The Development Plan for the Property shall meet all setback standards for building construction and parking as established for the B-6 District in the zoning code, as defined in the following table; Page 3 of 12 Lot Area 2.0 acre min. Lot Width 100' Principal Structure Setbacks Front (N)35' Side (E)10' Rear (S)30' Side Street (W)35' Parking Setbacks •includes driving lanes Front (N)20' Side (E)5' Rear (S)15' Side Street (W)15' Building Height Peak Height N/A 30* max. The above table values are based on the B-6 standards for residential zoning of the Orono municipal facilities to the north and the Orono Schools to the west; the industrial zoning to the south; and the intended commercial oflice zoning of the Adjacent Parcel to the east. Required off-street parking per Section 10.61, Subd. 10 shall be provided at a ratio of no less than 5 stalls per 1000 s.f. net building floor area. Final parking layout and traffic flow shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. Parking provided on the Adjacent Parcel to serve the minimum parking requirements or for excess parking for the Property shall be subject to an agreement as provided for in Orono Zoning Code Section 10.61 Subd. 6. The area of the Adjacent Parcel used to meet the minimum parking requirement for the Property shall be excluded from pertinent calculations when the Adjacent Parcel is developed. Page 4 of 12 8) The northeasterly access driveway to the Property shall be a shared driveway with the Adjacent Parcel, shall be centered on the common boundary between the Property and the Adjacent Parcel, and shall be operated as a standard “in-out" access. Appropriate traffic and parking signage within the site shall be installed subject to the Orono staff and City Engineer's review and approval. Applicants shall demonstrate to the Council ’s satisfaction that the southwest facade of the building facing the Highway 12/Old Crystal Bay Road intersection is treated architecturally as a primary facade that presents a positive visual image toward said intersection, with commensurate high quality landscaping. The percentage of the Property that is devoted to green space (not including areas within road rights-of-way) shall be maximized to the greatest extent possible but in no case shall be less than 25% of the lot area. Landscaping plan shall meet all landscaping standards established for the B-6 District in Section 10.45, Subdivision 6(H). In addition, the Developer shall be responsible for sodding the boulevard of Kelley Parkway and any other areas outside the Property boundary that may be disturbed. The developer shall create a “parkway ” character through substantial landscaping along Kelley Parkway; shall provide substantial deciduous trees along the west boundary; and shall provide a combination of deciduous and coniferous trees along the south boundary of the Property Along Kelley Parkway, the Development Plan shall incorporate a green (sod) boulevard no less than 8 feet in width behind the curbline of Kelley Parkway; a concrete sidewalk 6 feet in width located partially within the right-of way and partially on the Property; and a setback to parking from the north lot line of no less than 20 feet. The Property owner shall be responsible for installation and maintenance of the sidewalk and boulevard. Page5 ofl2 1 Street lighting along Kelley Parkway adjacent to the Property shall be provided by the Developer and shall be of a style, number, hei^t and location approved by the City Council. Along Old Crystal Bay Road, the setback from the eastern edge of the existing trail to the back of parking lot curb shall be no less than S feet. A suitable buffer to provide a sense of physical separation between the parking lot and users of the trail shall be provided, in the form of a hedge or vegetative barrier, a berm, a short barrier wall, additional separation, or some other method acceptable to the City Council. A trail easement shall be granted to the City over the westerly 25' of the Property. The City shall be responsible for maintenance of this trail. The proposed pedestrian trail along Highway 12 shall be constructed by the developer and shall be 8' wide, of bituminous surfacing and shall be located either within the Highway 12 right- of-way, subject to MnDOT approval, or within the Property, approximately abutting the south Property line. The intent of this trail is to provide a connection to the existing and future trail system along Highway 12, while providing separation from the traveled portion of the right-of-way. Because it is unknown at this time whether the Highway 12 shoulder may be converted from a niral section to an urban section, the exact location and design of the trail cannot be determined at this time. Therefore, construction of this trail may be deferred until such time that development of the Adjacent Parcel occurs, and/or until such time that a decision on the design of the Highway 12 shoulder is reached. The City Council shall make the final determination of when and how the trail is to be constructed. Developer shall pest suitable financial security in the interim for such construction. The City shall be responsible for the maintenance of this trail upon its completion and acceptance. Signage and lighting on the site shall adhere to the pertinent zoning code standards, and shall be subject to approval by the City Council. Site lighting shall be low and shielded, similar to Page 6 of 12 5 I ■ j the style of lighting found at the Orono Administrative Facilities. Site lighting along the west and south boundaries shall be provided adequate to light the trails along these two sides of the property. Final decisions by the Developer regarding colors, types and qualities of building materials shall be subject to Council approval. The proposed building shall be subject to the Architectural Standards for the B-6 District per Zoning Code Section 10.45, Subd. 6(1). The proposed dumpster enclosure shall be compatible architecturally with the proposed medical building and may be located near the southeast comer of the Property to allow for joint use with the Adjacent Parcel. The use of the building is specifically approved for professional office use. Retail uses accessory to the office use may be allowed through a formal amendment of the PUD, but if approved the combination of all such uses shall not exceed 5% of the gross floor area of the building. Applicants' architect shall submit final development plans to the Metro Council Environmental Services to detemiine the exact number of SAC units to be charged at the time of the issuance of building permits. Developer shall provide suitable evic'^nce of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) approval of the stormwater management plan before Development Plan Approval will be granted. Erosion control shall adhere to "Best Management Practices for Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas". All erosion controls as required by the City and by the MCWD shall be in place prior to commencement of excavation on the site. This Revised Concept Plan approval is based upon the known issues that mav affect this project, but this approval does not limit the City from revising or amending these conditions as the review process continues. Page 7 of 12 i 1 c.Plans and Specifications. The following plans and specifications shall be submitted for review and approval by the City and other appropriate jurisdictions: Final plans and specifications for all proposed utility lines and services, including any proposed revisions to existing service facilities. Proposed plans shall be provided to the City for final review and approval with the Preliminary Plan set. The Public Works Department and MnDOT shall reviev,- and approve all utility improvements. Final sanitary sewer and watermain plans shall be provided and are subject to approval by the ^blic Works Department. Final grading, drainage and erosion control plan showing existing and proposed contours, building locations, elevations, stormwater facilities and calculations, utilities and erosion control measures to be used during construction. Development Plan Approval will not be granted until the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and MnDOT have approved the stormwater plans. Final landscaping design plan with planting schedules including numbers and species, in accordance with the landscaping requirements of the B-6 zoning district. 4) Final building construction plans, including: a) b) c) d) elevations of all sides of the building; type and color of exterior building materials; proposed floor plan; building dimensions; and the location of trash and recycling containers and of heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment. Page 8 of 12 • f D. E. F. Parking lot construction plans, including confirmation that parking lots and driving lanes will be paved and provided with concrete curb and gutter, and that all driving lanes within parking lots shall have a 9-ton minimum pavement section. A geotechnical evaluation of the soil shall be done in conjunction with the pavement design and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval. Detailed signage and lighting plans. Any additional plans and spt '^ifications deemed necessary by the City as review progresses. Development Agreement. Development Approval is contingent upon the successful execution of a Development Agreement between the applicant and the City. Such Agreement shall address all specific City requirements for the development. Financial Guarantee. The Development Agreement shall include a financial guarantee by the applicant to ensure the completion of site improvements. The City Engineer shall complete an estimate of improvement costs, including but not limited to landscaping, grading, erosion control, utilities, driveways and parking areas, trails, sidewalks, retaining walls and stormwater management facility construction, and the applicant shall provide to the City a financial guarantee of 150% of the improvement costs. Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fee. The standard Stomi Water and Drainage Trunk Fee for commercial development shall be paid by the developer at the rate of $6,480 per acre (2002 Fee Schedule). The City Council shall determine prior to final Development Plan approval whether the Developer will be charged additional fees for off-site stormwater improvements that benefit this property. The Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fee shall not be charged for the acreage within the Adjacent Parcel that is to be developed to serve the property; said Fee for the acreage in the Adjacent Parcel shall be charged at the time the Adjacent Parcel is developed. Page 9 of 12 3. 4. 5. G.Park Dedication. The City Council shall determine prior to Development Plan Appioval whether Paiic Dedication requirements are applicable to this project. If so, the City will determine the dedication requirement in land or fee payment prior to Development Plan Approval. Sewer and Water Connection Charges. The applicant shall pay sewer and water connection charges to the City in an amount to be arrived at by use of the following formula: A - Z X 2.0 acres x S14,115/acre *= Connection Charge Due A where: A = number of SAC units required for the office building 2 ^ number of sevser/water units paid previously 2.0 acres = area of the Property $14,115 = per-acre connection fees for 1989 Highway 12 municipal sewer & water project. This Revised General Concept Plan Approval resolution approves the development concept subject to the applicant meeting the requirements of this resolution and all other requirements of the City. This resoluii''” does not constitute approval of the rezoning of the property nor of the Adjacent Parcel. Such approval shall only be considered when the City Council finds that all “Conditions for Development Plan Approval" as identified herein have been met. This Revised General Concept Plan Approval shall be effective for a period of 6 months from the date of this resolution. If Development Plan Approval is not granted within that period, the terms and conditions of this resolution shall be null and void. The City Council at its sole discretion may extend this effective period. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of ti i resolutic .. in ti:e Chain of Title of the property. Page 10 of 12 I Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 9th day of September, 2002. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Applicant (for Professional Properties of Orono, LLP as Developer) Ronald J. Moorse (for the City of Orono as Property Owner) STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this__day of 2002 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City, Notary Public Page 11 of 12 ____ STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument *.VaS acknowledged before me on this day of 2002 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of 2002 by Ronald J. Moorse, City Administrator of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNE/IN Notary Public On this day of , 2002, personally appeared before me, ____who is personally known to me ____whose identity I proved on the basis of whose identity I proved on the oath/anirmation of ________________, a credible witness and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed on behalf of Professional Properties of Orono, LLP. Notary Public Page 12 of 1 2 J/ J Bonestroo Ifosene Ancferlfk& ^ I Associates Engineers & Architects ffttMfit. Aim# ih ana Atioclatf t« Inc. Ii an Afflraiaiiva Acifan/ifyal Oppartunlty lai»lt3ftf ana Ownta PfInciMit: Oito a fontstroo. Pf. • Marvin t SorvMA P-t • GItnn R. Cooli. PJL • Rotoart a SchMnkhl. PI. • Jtrry A. Bourdoa P-i* ^ B SaNar Cantiatanit: RoOart W. Rosana. PX • JoiapA C Anaarlift. PX • Richard C. Ibmar. PX • Susan ML (bania CPA Asiaciata Prlnc^aii: KaiKh A Gordon. PX • Robarc X PfRfftrta. PX • Rkhard W. Postar. PX • Oavid O. LosIwitA PX • Mark A Hanioa PX • Mkhaal T. Rautmana PX • 1M X naM. PX • Karviaih P Andarsoa PX • Mark X Rolfs. PX • OavtaARonastroaMAA* SkRiay P Wllkamson. PX LI • Agnas M. RJrig. MXA • Allan Rick Schmidt. PX • Thomas W. Patarsorv PX • Jamas X Maland. PX • Milas X iansan. PX • L Phlinp Graval IX PX • Oanial 1 Cdgarton. PX ■ ismaal Martmat. PX • Thomas A Syfko. PX • Shaidon X Johnson e oaia A Growa. PX • Thomas A Roushar. PX • Robart X OavtryL PX Offlcat: St Paid. St Ooud. Rochascar and WUknar. MN • MUwaukaa. Wl • Chicago. X RMbsIta: wwwAonastrooxom August 30,2002 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Attn: Iiffike Wyatt Gray Freshwater Center 2500 Shadywood Road Excelsior, MNS5331 received SEP 0 3 Pm CITYOrOROAiO Re: Exemption request for Lot l,Block 1, Willow Prop. Addn., City of Orono Hie No. 139-02-000 Mr. Wyatt: Enclosed is the WCA Exemption Certificate for the above-mentioned site located just south of Orono City Hall. Included with the exemption are 11 years worth of aerial photos of the site 1955 to present. I have also provided a NWI and Soils map. Although this site exhibits wetland characteristics this summer, we feel that this is due to unusually high rainfall and poor site drainage due to past disturbance. We request that you review the enclosed documentation and submit written approval of the exemption for this site. If you have any questions feel free to call me at 651-604-4767 or John Smyth at 651-604-4708. Sincerely, Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderiik & Associates Ben Meyer Wetland Scientist cc. John Smyth, BRA Mike Oaffron, City of Orono 23Bi West Highway 36 > St. Paul, MN 5S1I3 .651-636-4600 • Fax: 65I-636-I3II i n Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF NO LOSS OR EXEMPTION* APPLICANT AND PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION City of Orono. Tom Kellogg -City Engineer Name(s) of Applicant 2335 W. Hwy 36 ir.ll: Minnehaha Creek Watenhed District. Mike Wyatt Project Location: 1/4 NW 1/4 NE S33_T 118 R_22 UTM Coordinates: X:_______Y:_________ Street Address St. Paul. MN 55113 County Naroe/Number. Hennepin City, State, Zip Code ( 651 ^604-4863 Minor Watershed Name/Number: Minnehaha Creek Size of entire wetland: 2_____acres ;NWI NoWetland type: Circular 39.1 (I Telephone (Pay)(Evening) Check one: * <50% 50%-80% or > 80% Check one: ♦ Agricultural land; Non-ag. land PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION Describe the nature and purpose of the proposed project: To determine the extent of wetland and/or non-wetland arM.on a city A field determination on August 29,2002 showed the site as exhibiting wetlandowned two-acre parcel for future development. characteristir*, rHie to the fact that this is one of the wettest summers on record, the presence of past distu^ance w:^ evident. and the outlet appears to be ineffective, aerial photos and FSA slides were examined. By conipannE histone aenal photos (see Figures^ the site has only developed wetland characteristics since the construction of Kellev Blvd a nd the city hall to the naith /after 1991V This construction disturbance appears to have changed the drai nage of the area.--------------------------------- (attach additknal ptfcs if Deeded) Timeuble: nmiect will begin on / / (mo/day/yr) and will be completed by J___f. The wetland activity at the above site qualifies for the following under the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) (check one): No Loss Determination (attach plans) Exemption # Subo. 5 (per MN Rule Chapter 8420.0122) (Note: Applicant is responsible for submitting the proof necessary to show qualification for the exemption claimed.) Description of Exemption Claimed: Wetland: This site did not exhibit wetland characteristics until after 1991 . when the road and ciiyhajhj^^e built to the north. Previous years of aerial photos show active agriculture with no indication of wetlands. There is an area of hvdric soils mapped, but no NWl appears on the site. APPLICANT SIGNATURE The information provided for this determination is truthful and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I ensure that, in draining or filling the subject wetland under an exemption noted above, appropriate erosion control measures will be uken to prevent sedimentation of the water, the drain or fill will not block fish passage, and the drain or fill will be conducted in compliance with all other applicable federal, state and local requirements, including best management practices and water resource protection requirements established under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 103H. Certinciie of No-Lou or ExexDpiioii (2<XX)) Page 1 of 2 --------------^ SEP n i 2002 Cl I Y Km/r REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: September 6,2002 ITEM NO.: 3 Departmeot Approval: Name Michael P. GafTron Title Planning Director Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: 2001-2002 Marina Licenses:1) Windward Marina 2) Genmar/Kings Cove 3) Sailor's World 4) North Shore Marina 5) Wayzata Marine List of Exhibits (For each Application) A - 2002 Application B - Site Plan Additional Exhibits re Wayzata Marine 1 - Waade list of issues 2 - MPG Letter to Wayzata Marine 6-27-02 3 - MPG Letter to Waade 6-27-02 4 - Famiok Memo 9-4-02 Licensing Process License year 2002 marina license applications and fees were received earlier this year from each of the flve Orono marinas. License yeai 2001 marina license applications and fees were received in early 2001 but were not processed during 2001. License year 2001 licenses were issued during 2000 and are functionally still in effect. This memo is requesting Council approval for issuance of licenses for the period January 1,2001 through December 31, 2002. In the past, staff has attempted to inspect each marina in mid-season, with annual licenses presented to Council for formal approval shortly thereafter. This annual inspection process, which is nal required by code, did not occur in 2001 and has yet to be completed for 2002. However, staff has visited a number of the marinas within the past year, either in regards to complaints or informally for other purposes. The delay in license processing until an inspection has been completed, is cumbersome for staff and perhaps unfair to the marinas, and should be discontinued. It is staffs recommendation that the processing of annual marina licenses be completed upon their submittal (usually in February), and any issues with the Operation Standards be dealt with as they arise during the year, or be dealt with as a zoning matter if that is *he case. 2001-2002 Marina Licenses September 6,2002 Page 2 Fire Sifety Inspections The Fire Marshal has inspected all the marinas for compliance with State Fire Code regulations, and at this time there are no outstanding issues. Conditions of License Approval Section 5.43, Subd. 5(C), requires that each business licensee adhere to the following minimum operation standards: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Parking facilities on the site shall be managed so as to eliminate traffic or parking congestion, eliminate illegal on-street parking, and avoid pedestrian traffic through neighboring property. Boat engine testing and charging shall be limited to the hours 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Retail sales and service shall be limited to the hours 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. except as necessary to accommodate normal fishing activity or private use of premises stored boats. The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free of garbage. On-land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view obstructions for traffic entering and leaving the site. '^arking and on-land storage of boats, trailers, materials and equipment shall be imited to those locations shown on an approved site operation plan, which plan shall be submitted or updated as part of the annual license application. Such site operation plan shall also indicate seasonally variable uses. Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacent properties. Individual Marina Background A. Windward Marina - 1444 Shoreline Drive Windward Marina has 40 rental slips on Tanager Lake and 78 on Browns Bay for a total ofl 18. 'Hie marina sells and services boats and equipment in the facility on the Tanager Lake side of Shoreline Drive. A gazebo/toilet building is provided on the Browns Bay side. The site includes 26 parking stalls on the Browns Bay side, and 47 suills on the Tanager Lake side, a portion of which are located on tne adjacent residential property in which the owners, Mr. and Mrs. Rivers, reside. The attached site plan was approved by the City via Resolution #2674 on August 14, 1989. 2001*2002 Marina Licenses September 6,2002 Page 3 The applicant has generally adhered to the seven minimum operation standards. Aspects of the operation which require ongoing attention in order to remain in compliance with the operation standards, include eliminating storage of marina equipment on the residential overtlow parking area, maintaining parking spaces within the paved lot next to the building as opposed to fil'- . it with boats for sale, and managing parking to minimize customer necessity of crossing County Road IS. Staff recommends approval of a 2001*2002 license for Windward Marina. B. Gen mar Industrics/King ’s Cove -1449 Shoreline Drive Genmar/King's Cove provides 66 rental slips on Tanager Lake and 48 slips on Browns Bay of which 36 are rental and 12 are used for boats for sale. Facilities include 71 parking stalls on the Browns Bay side of County Road IS. This site underwent major renovation in 1997, including replacement of the old storage building with a smaller office and restroom facility, upgrade of landscaping, a slight increase in parking and a major expansion of the stormwater pond. No activities occurring at the site require a conditional use permit. Applicants are currently in compliance with the seven operational standards and the conditions of approval of the recent renovation approval resolution #383S. Stair recommends approval of a 2001-2002 marina license for Genmar/King's Cove. C. Sailor's World - 1955 Shoreline Drive Sailor’s World operates a ship's store, boat club (CUP issued 1995), and rents slips, with a current dock capacity of 79 boats. This marina was reconstructed in the early 1990's. Activities occurring on this site which require ongoing attention by the property owner in order to remain in compliance with the seven operation standards include: managing parking facilities, including the use of off-site facilities for overflow parking to avoid parking and traffic problems, keeping the storage of boats and other items out of the designated landscape areas, and ongoing maintenance of the parking lot perimeter stormwater filtration system. Staff recommends appro^nl of a 2001-2002 marina license for Sailor's World. North Shore Marina - 3222 North Shore Drive The North Shore Marina operation includes 93 slips in the water (historically the City only allowed 86 slips, but LMCD allows 93) plus a dry stack storage unit with 72 slots (all of which LMCD licenses but only 20 of which Orono has historically approved for lake use). The property also contains a service building, an office, a "club house" for slip U;,ers, and two dwellings, one of which is vacant and the other which has bwn used occasionally as a caretal»r unit and which is cuiTently undergoing a remodeling. 2001-2002 Marina Licenses September 6,2002 Page 4 The site provides ample parking for customers in the summer and a large capacity for boat storage in the winter. This site has been fully utilized for winter boat storage in recent years. This marina in spring 2001 applied for CUP approval for use of all 72 dry stack slots for On-I>cmand Launching. The use of the dry stack system at North Shore has not posed any problems for the City. The primary concern would be parking, which is ample on this, the largest of Orono's marina sites. A secondar concern is boat density on the lake; however, since the LMCD has long maintained the position that all *.' dry stack slots can be used for boats that are for lake use (as opposed to for sale or waiting for service, etc.) it would be consistent for the City to acknowledge all 72 for lake use. *rhe application was tabled in April 2001 by the Planning Commission at applicant's request v.t order for him to satisfy identified neighborhood concerns regarding the marina. We expect the application to proceed this winter. Activities occurring on the site which require the property owner’s ongoing attention in order to remain in compliance with the seven operation stan^ds include limiting storage of boat trailers and other equipment to those areas noted on the approved site plan. The applicant has recently completed a substantial amount of landscaping work in thi.« area to make the dry stack units less visible from the road and has added more trees and a fence west of the service building to screen it from the adjacent residential .noperties. Staff recommends approval of a 2001-2002 license for North Shore Marina. *rhe license v.''ill be annotated to indicate that use of all 72 dry-stack units for boats for lake use requires completion of the CUP process. E. Wayzata Marine - 3324 North Shore Drive Wayzata Marine began operating at this site in 2000, taking over from the former Lakeside Marina. The operation has historically included sales of boats, motors, trailers and marine accessories; boat repair and servicing; on-land winter/summer boat storage; and 77 in-water slips (70 rental). It is noted that the 2000,2001 and 2002 license requests to Orono include 5 boats stored on land for lake use in addition to the 77 in water, but their 2002 LMCD license does not include these five. Orono will not approve these on-Iand units for lake use if they are customer-owned boats stored for on- demand launching, (which requires a CUP from Orono and additional BSU’s from LMCD) and the license will be issued for 77 in-water slips only. While the marina requests continued licensing for fuel sales, fuel has not been sold from the site for the past three years since the old tanks were removed and new ones have not yet been installed. Staff has visited this site on many occasions within the past year, primarily due to ongoing complaints by the adjoining property owner, Robert Waade, regarding site lighting, use of the paging system, and a number of other issues. Council may recall that Waade was granted a subdivision with a number of variances as well as a conditional use permit to construct a single family lakeshore residence and a duplex on the property in 1998. This site was previously vacant for many years, and Waade purchased it from the DNR. Waade was certainly aware of the marina operation when he purchased the property, but has for ;he past year made numerous complaints regarding the marina. This culminated in the attached list of complaints by Waade and the City’s response (please review letters to Waade and to Wayzata Marine dated June 27,2002). i 2001-2002 Marina Licenses September 6,2002 Pages As of this writing, David Briggs of Wayzata Marine has advised me that the offending lighting has been removed and the new lighting has been installed (at a cost of S6,000) and redirected away from the adjacent property; however, he has not heard from Waade as to whether this has solved the problem. Mr. Waade has indicated to staff that the light spillover problem has not been improved. Orono Police Sgt. Corey Famiok viewed the lighting situation the evening of September 3rd at Ron Moorse ’s request and submitted the attached report, which suggests that the light spillover to the Waade property has been reduced but nor eliminated. Mr. Waade has recently advis^ Ron Moorse he would be sending us an updated list of complaints, which we have not received. Both Mr. Waade and Mr. Briggs have been advised that the marina licenses will be reviewed by the Council on September 9th, and one or both may be present for comment. Staffhas generally found the Wayzata Marine operation to be well-run and the site is kept in much better condition than it was by the previous owner. Staffs June 27th responses reflect the City’s position on each of Waade’s known issues. Staff recommends approval of a 2001-2002 Commercial Marina License for Wayzata Marine, subject to final resolution of the lighting issue to the satisfaction of staff, and with an annotation indicating the 5 requested on-land boats for lake use cannot be customer owned boats for on-demand launching. General Marina Issues The marinas provide necessary services to the Lake Minnetonka community, by providing a wide range of lake access opportimities, boat maintenance and repair services, and winter storage. While it can be argued that boat sales (and peihaps even boat storage and many maintenance/repair activities) are lu>.ctions that don’t strictly require a location on the water, one or .nore of these activities continue to be a significant part of the business at each of our marinas. Each Orono marina has site constraints that limit the level of reasonable site activity. A primary concern is adequate parking. Three of the five marinas have significantly redeveloped in the last decade, resulting in the City’s ac<'eptance of a certain level of improvements which support varying levels of commercial activity for each site. None of the mannas have ever met the hardcover standards of the zoning code, but when redevelopment has been approved by the City, the amount of hardcover tolerated at the marinas has always far surpassed the hardcover limits imposed on residential development. The marinas historically have generate only very few complaints from the public or nearby landowners. Parking management on a day-to-day basis has been one of the City’s primary concerns with marinas through the years, with the dual intent of keeping the level of site use commensurate with the site capacity sc there is no burden on adjoining landowners nor on the public roadways; while maintaining site accessibility for general use and emergency purposes. Ancillary activities t^t have occurred occasionally in the past at some marinas such as fishing contests, charter boat activity and various ‘special events’ can create periods where the marinas might outstrip their capacity and 2001-2002 Marina Licenses September 6,2002 Page 6 negatively impact the neighborhood. In general, the marinas tend to be busiest during either end of the season when boats are either being dropped in or hauled out, and on fair-weather weekends throughout the summer. A pertuq»s secondary issue for the City has been the burden on the lake itself as boats have become larger and faster, and the methods for providing lake access have become more iimovative (diy- stacking, boat clubs, etc.). However, in recent years the City has primarily focused on land-use issues and left the larger issue of lake use to the LMCD. Staff Ptcommendation Staff recommends approval of 2001-2002 commercial marina licenses for Windward Marina, Genmar/KingV Cove, Sailor's World, North Shore Marina, and Wayzata Marine with iqrpropriate conditions as noted above. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Proposed Mottoa: Moved by ^seconded by . to direct staff to issue 2001-2002 cortunetcial marina licenses to Windward Marina, Genmar/King's Cove, Sailor’s World, North Shore Marina and Wayzata Marine. Vote:_______ayes,____nays. CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 5S323 Phone 952-249-4600 License Year 2002 City Use Only Date application sent to Marina 1/17/02 Date application returned to City______ Fee Enclosed S AWM/ALC .•joioi;RCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION . Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section S.43, Subdivision 2 - Licensed Required. It is unlawful for any persons to engage or participate in business use without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION. REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY MARCH I OF THE LICENSE YEAR. L BUSINESS INFORMATION 5*4^^^ 4-S LA^T ^^74'/^ 1. BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME UlMDLOAi^ ___________ Street Address aI/T Tfeiv/ff* \________ Mailing Address 4l4o7~g>7V//vl/y M.rsl Marina Phone 9^1 Office Phone 9S‘2. 2. OWNERSHIP/OPERATION Fee Owner (if different than above) Address Phone 3. BUSINESS ORGANIZATION: (Check applicable item) ____ individual ownership ____ partnership corporation List the name of each partner or corporate officer and their title: Name of the marina manager responsible for daily operation: /rgAi lLdi3D7~ List the minimum number of employees on outy when the marina is open to the public during the boating season: —^r dock attendants repair or service personnel e manna is open to the public during Others available for sales/public information, etc. List every short or long term business occupant of the property other than the Business noted above: f^f> hi ^_________________________________________ Page 1 of 3 1 4. 1 y Jp«l Ui«a in-water slip rental sales of boats/motors/trailers/ marine accessories boat repair and servicing on-land boat storage X winter summer Accessory Uses marine fuel sales sale of bait and fishing tackle Conditional Uses fConditional Use Permit is Reoulredl ____boat club ____public boat launching, on-demand ____public boat launching, transient ____charter boat port-of-call ____caretaker dwelling unit head pumpout fishing tournament site sale of pre-packaged food dive shop clubhouse (for slip or boat club customers) lessons/teachmg boat rental sailboard sales/rental iceboat sales/rental ice fishing tackle sales cross-country ski sale/rental 5.BUSINESS SCHEDULE (Check appropriate items): AS 1AS>'^ yC open all year List proposed *iours of operation: ____ open during boating season only dock access: to ____ PM retail sales & service:AM to PM 6. MARINA SECURITY is provided by: C retaker living on site? O 1 ^ AS UArS>T n. SLIPS AND BOAT UNITS List the maximum number of boats in each category. Each slip, mooring or other space actually used for storage or keeping of boats or watercraft must be indicated and numbered on the dock and site plan submitted with this application. 7.BOATS STORED IN THE WATER (for lake use) At dock slips Total Boats in Water Company Rental Rental Slips/ Other Owned Boats Spaces Total Boats AS LA^'^ a 8.BOATS STORED ON UND FOR LAKE USE a. b. c. Inside Buildings Outside on Racks Outside • other means Total Boats Stored on Land for Lake Use 9.TOTAL BOATS FOR LAKE USE (Add 7 and 8) Page 2 of S irft-in-ianiii imtii 10. OTHER BOA TS ON PREMISES (SUMMER) a. Transient boats (repair/service) b. New boats for sale (inventory) c. Used boats for sale (inventory) d. Other (list:_____]______ ) Total 11. OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (WINTEp) a. Transient boats (repair/service) b. Contract storage (customer's boats) c. Inventory (new Sc, used boats) d. Other (list:____________ ) Total Inside Bulldina Outside Building Total Inside Buildiny Outside Building Total JDQL OFF^TREET PARKING REOUIP’^.MENTS 12.SUMMER PARKING a.Retail sales/service customers 8 spaces minimum (+I per each 800 s.f. over 1,000 s.f.) »spaces b.Boating customers 6 spaces per 10 boats for lake use [.6 x (line 9)] -spaces c.Launching ramp customers (day use) 10 spaces minimum per ramp *spaces d.Charter boat port-of-call 1 space per each 3 seats of gross charter boat capacity [gross charter capacity x 0.33] *=spaces c.Total spaces requir^ (add a, b, c. & d) spaces Total spaces available per attached parking plan spaces 13.WINTER PARKING REQUIRED a.0.20 X (line 12e)spaces rv. DOCK CONSTRUCTION 14. CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: ____ Permanent __ Pilings: ____ Wood _ Decking: ____ Wood Flotation Method (if used): ^t/uT last Seasonal Concrete _ Metal Foam __ De-icing noimaiiy used Metal ____ Otfier___ Other ________________ Barrels Other P»|e 3 of 5 UCENSE STANDARDS ADVISORY Businesses lequired to be licensed under Section S.43 shall be subject to the requirements and performance standards of the B-2 Zoning District and per the following business use license standards: A.Insurance Required. Each business shall provide certification of liability insurance coverage for the duration of the license period. B Licenseholder. The primary business operator on the property shall be the licenseholder, and shall be responsible for notifying the City of any and all businesses subleased on the premises. Such secondary businesses shall not be separately licensed but shall be allowed only when in conformance with the provisions of the B-2 zoning district standards. C.Operation Standards. Each business licensee shall adhere to the following minimum operation standards: Parking facilities on the site shall be managed so as to eliminate traffic or parking congestion, eliminate illegal on-street parking, and avoid pedestrian traffic through neighboring property. Boat engine testing and charging shall be limited to the hours 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Retail sales and service shall be limited to the hours 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. except as necessary to accommodate normal fishing activity or private use of premises stored boats. 4) 5) The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free of garbage. On land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view obstructions for traffic entering and leaving the site. Parking and on-land storage of boats, trailers, materials and equipment shall be limited to those locations shown on an approved site operation plan, which plan shall be submitted or updated as part of the annual license application. Such site operation plan shall also indicate seasonally variable uses. Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacent properties. Business Use Licenses Limited to B-2 Zone. No business use shall be licensed in any zoning district other than B-2, except that when a business use is allowed by ordinance in another zoning district, such use conducted in said district shall not be required to obtain a license. License Revocation. Failure to adhere to the above business use license standards shall be cause for license suspension or revocation per the provisions of this chapter. Page 4 of 5 1 ; ? n. 1 ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: 1. 2. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY/SI 1E PLAN/PARKING PLAN indicating the boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access areas, fencing and landscaping features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show all existing facilities, all changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for the duration of the current application. The drawing shall also indicate the locations of winter storage and required winter parking spaces. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE for the duration of the license period. 3. Copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION. 4.COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. Initial Application @ $300.00 $_________ Renewal Application @ $200.00 Late Fee (if not postmariced by March 1) $100.0) TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $ S 0.OO REVIEW PROCEDURE When a complete application is received, the City Council will review the license application and will thereafter pass upon the application per the licensing procedures of Chapter S. THE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PUBLIC USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section S.43 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Marina License application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City's designated employees or agents to enter upon the marina property at any reasonable time to perform safety and code compliance inspections. Authorized Signature Date ^JihIoI- Title Relationship to Owner Page 5 of 5 *.• • . • • V CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 ■ Crystal Bay, MN 5S323 Phone 952-249-4600 License Year 2002 ANNUAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION . Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section S.43, Subdivision 2 - Licensed Required. It is unlawful for any peraons to engage or participate in business use without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS. AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY MARCH I OF THE LICENSE YEAR. 1. BUSINESS INFORMATION 1. BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME Genmar Industries. Inc. Street Address 2900 IDS Center. 80 South 8th Street Mailing Address Same Marina Phone Office Phone 2. OWNERSHIP/OPERATION Fee Owner (if different than above) Genmar Industries^ Tnr Address Same_____________________________ Phone 3. BUSINESS ORGANIUTION: (Check applicable item) ____ individual ownership ____ partnership corporation List the name of each partner or corporate officer and their title: Grant E. Oppeqaard. President_____ Mary P. McConnell. Vice President and Secretary Name of the marina manager responsible for daily operation: K1nq*s Cove Boat Sales_______________ List the minimum number of employees on duty when the marina is open to the public during the boating season: __4ock attendants _______ repair or service personnel 3 others available for sales/public information, etc. List every short or long term business occupant of the property other than the Business noted above: Page 1 of 5 4. PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY (Check all services offered): Priacipal Uses X in-water slip rental X sales of boats/motors/lrailers/ marine accessories ____ boat repair and servicing X on-land boat storage winter summer marine fuel sales sale of bait and fishing tackle Candittoiial Uiaa fConditioaal Use Permit is ReoulredI ____boat club ____public boat launching, on-demand ____public boat launching, transient ____charter boat port-of-call ____caretaker dwelling unit Accessory Uses X head p‘ .npout __ fishing tournament site sale of pre-packaged food ____ dive shop ____ clubhouse (for slip or boat club customers) ____ lessons/teaching ____ boat rental ____ sailboard sales/rental ____ iceboat sales/rental ____ ice fishing tackle sales ____ cross-country ski sale/rental 5.BUSINESS SCHEDULE (Check appropriate items): X open all year Lbt proposed hoars of operation: ____ open during boating season only dock access: 2AhrsAM to retail sales &. service: AM to PM PM 6.MARINA SECURITY is provided by: Kin9's Cove Caretaker living on site? _____No_________ n. SLIPS AND BOAT UNITS List the maximum number of boats in each category. Each slip, mooring or other space actually used for storage or keeping of boats or watercraft must be indicated and numbered on the dock and site plan submitted with this application. 7.BOATS STORED IN THE WATER (for lake use) At dock slips Total Boats in Water Company Rental Rental Slips/ Other Owned Boats Spaces Total BoaU a 111 U1 111 111 8.BOATS STORED ON LAND FOR LAKE USE Inside Buildings __ Outside on Racks ___ Ouuide - other means __ Total Boats Stored on Land for Lake Use a. b. c. 9.TOTAL BOATS FOR LAKE USE (Add 7 and 8)111 Page 2 of 9 ! r • • 10. OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (SUMMER)Inside Building Outside Buildine a.Transient boats (repair/service) b.New boats for sale (inventory)4 c.Used boats for sale (inventory) d.Other (list: ) Total 4 •Total 11. OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (WINTER)Inside Building Outside Buildins a.Transient boats (repair/service) b.Contract storage (customer's boats)44 c.Inventory (new & used boats) d.Other flist: 1 Total 50-57 Total IV. DOCK CONSTRUCTION 14.CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: X Permanent __ Wood _ Wood Pilings: ___ Decking: X Flotation Method (if used): Seasonal Concrete __ Meul Foam {__ De>icing normally used Metal Other Other Barrels Other Plastic m.OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS 12.SUMMER PARKING a.Retail sales/^ervice customers 8 spaces minimum (*^1 per each 800 s.f. over 1,00. s.f.) «s spaces b.Boating customers 6 spaces per 10 boats for lake use [.6 x (line 9)] ■>07 spaces c.Launching ramp customers (day use) 10 spaces minimum per ramp *-spaces d.Charter boat port-of-call 1 space per each 3 seats of gross charter boat capacity [gross charter capacity x 0.33] “spaces c.Total soaces reauirH (add a. b. c. & d) soaces Total spaces available per attached parking plan 71 spaces 13.WINTER PARKING REQUIRED a.0.20 X (line 12e)14 spaces 4 iI4T Tyi jam Page 3 of 5 lUMiH j % LICENSE STANDARDS ADVISORY Businesses required to be licensed under Section S.43 shall be subject to the requirements and performance standards of the B*2 Zoning District and per the following business use license standards: A.Insurance Required. Each business shall provide certification of liability insurance coverage for the duration of the license period. B.Licenseholder. The primary business operator on the property shall be the licenseholder, and shall be responsible for notifying the City of any and all businesses subleased on the premises. Such secondary businesses shall not be separately licensed but shall be allowed only when in conformance with the provisions of the B-2 zoning district standards. C.Operation Standards. Each business licensee shall adhere to the following minimum operation standards: Parking facilities on the site shall be managed so as to eliminate traffic or parking congestion, eliminate illegal on-street parking, and avoid pedestrian traffic through neighboring property. Boat engine testing and charging shall be limited to the hours 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Retail sales and service shaM be limited to the hours 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. except as necessary t accommodate normal fishing activity or private use of premises stored boats. 4) 5) The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free of garbage. On land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view obstructions for traffic entering and leaving the site. Parking and on-land storage of boats, trailers, materials an j equipment shall be limited to those locations shown on an approved siic operation plan, which plan shall be submined or updated as part of the annual license application. Such site operation plan shall also indicate seasonally variable uses. Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacent properties. Business Use Licenses Limited to B-2 Zone. No business use shall be licensed in any zoning district other than B-2, e.xcept that when a business use is allowed by ordinance in another zoning district, such use conducted in said district shall not be required to obtain a license. License Revocation. Failure to adhere to the above business use license standards shall be cause for license suspension or revocation per the provisions of diis ch^ter. Pa^e 4 of 5 i ; • • • » ' ATTA( The following must accompany this application; 1.CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY/SITE PLAN/PARKING PLAN indicating the boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access areas, fencing and Imdscaping features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show all existing facilities, all chugM from the previous season, and any changes proposed for the duration of the current application. The drawing shall also indicate the locations of winter storage and required winter parking spaces. 2.CERTIFICATE OF LIABILfTY INSURANCE COVERAGE for the duration of the license period. 3. Copy of >our LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION. COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. Initial Application @ $300.00 Renewal Application @ $200.00 Late Fee (if not postmarked by March I) $100.0) $ 200.00 $ TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $ 200.00 REVIEW PROCEDURE When a complete application is received, the City Council will review the license application and will tliereafter pass upon the application per the licensing procedures of Chapter 5. THE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PUBLIC USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE I iCENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. • Pursuant to Section 5.43 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Marina License application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City’s designated employees or agents to enter upon the marina property at any reasonable time to perform safety and code compliance inspections. Authorized Signature onneTl Title Vice President and Secretary _ Date 1/2A/Q2 Relationship to Owner Same Pkge S of S i * # * *. T jr* CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Ciyttal Bmy, MN 55323 Phone 952-249-4600 License Year 2002 CHy Um Oaty Dtte ipplicatioa sent to Marina 1/17/02 Dale application retuined to City Fee Enclosed $ ANNUAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION . Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section S.43, Subdivision 2 • Licensed Required, ft is unlawful for any persons to engage or participate in business use without first having obuined a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS. AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY MARCH I OF THE LICENSE YEAR 1. BUSINESS INFORMATION 1. BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME IVO/ld Street Address I ^ ^ C, IVdJLf^t ttX tY)ir / Mailing Address j________ Marina Phone ^*7^* ^_____Office Phone ______________ OWNERSmP/OPERA TION Fee Owner (if different than above) ^ I ^_____ Address ^ Li)P/lir (^LOjI5 iO\'\C^ i/T Slt Phone 3. BUSINESS ORGANIZATION: (Check applicable item) ____ individual ownership ____ partnership ^ corporation List tl^ name of each partner or corporate officer CoGl riyf Y-) A s fii y.P Name of the marina manager responsible for daily operation: l^'\: i(e ■ (I'n C-u-,.. List the minimum number of employees on duty when the marina is open to the public during the boating season: 3*' *~/ dock attendants repair or service personnel «3' ^ others available for sales/public information, etc. List every short or long term business occupant of the property other than the Business noted above: Ptige 1 of S I i I 4. PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY (Check all services offered): Priaclnal Uses in-water slip rental sales of boats/motors/trailers/ marine accessories Uses;»wi > head pumpout __ fishing tournament site boat repair and servicing iC on-land boat storage a winter summer y marine fuel sales ___ sale of bait and fishing tackle Conditional Uses ^Conditional Use Permit la Required^ “yt boat club ___ public boat launching, on-demand ____ public boat launching, transient ____charter boat port-of-call ____caretaker dwelling unit sale of pre-packaged food dive shop clubhouse (for slip or boat club customers) lessons/teaching boat rental sailboard sales/rental iceboat sales/rental ice fishing tackle sales cross-country ski sale/rental 5.BISINESS SCHEDULE (Check appropriate items): _ open all year Lbt proposed hours of ^ration: ____ open during boating season only dock access: y AM to PM retail sales & service: S AM to ^ PM MARINA SECURITY is provided by: I4^ni\j.pu\ ^Cf .u-^i4't-jCuar/r* Caretaker living on site? _________________________________________________ n. SLIPS AND BOAT UNITS List the maximum number of boats in each category. Each slip, mooring or other space actually used for storage or keeping of boats or watercraft must be indicated and numbered on the dock and site plan submitted with this application. BOATS STORED IN THE WATER (for Inke use) At dock slips Total Boats in Water Company Rental Rental Slips/ Other Owned Boats Spaces ToUl Boats a i _I0_ Jflt. Ja itu 8.BOATS STORED ON LAND FOR LAKE USE Inside Buildings __ Outside on Racks __ Outside - other means __ Total Boats Stored on Land for Lake Use a. b. c. 9.TOTAL BOATS FOR LAKE USE (Add 7 and 8)Oi Page 2 of 5 i -.T-iTxnTicT ’T,- ;^«sTnp' " itxmivwc* - L 10.OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (SUMMER) a. Transient boats (repair/service) b. New boats for sale (inventory) c. Used boats for sale (inventory) d. Other (list:_____]_______ 1 Total Inside Buildiny Outside Building IZ3 Total 11.OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (WINTER) a. Transient boats (repair/service) b. Contract storage (customer’s boats) c. Inventory (new & used boats) d. Other (list:__________________]_) Total Inside Building Outside Buildiny Hi Total IV. 14. QCK CONSTRUCTION CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: Permanent WoodPilings: Decking: __ Seasonal V- Concrete Wood Flotation Method (if used): S. Metal Foam _ De-icing normally used 14etal ____ Other___ Oiher Barrels Other Pige 3 of 5 imiMl. f nil OFF^TREET PARKING REOUIREMENTS 12.SUMMER PARKING a.Retail sales/service customers 8 spaces minimum (+I per each 800 s.f. over 1,000 s.f.) *•fi spaces b.Boating customers 6 spaces per 10 boats for lake use (.6 x (line 9)] ■>spaces c.Launching ramp customers (day use) 10 spaces minimum per ramp ■>spaces d. Charter boat port-of-call I space per each 3 seats of gross charter boat capacity [gross charter capacity x 0.33] “spaces c.Total spaces requir^ (add a, b, c, & d) 2-' spaces Total spaces available per attached parking plan spaces 13.WINTER PARKING REQ UIRED % a.0.20 X (tine I2e)^spaces IJBAM i ATTA< The following must iccompany this application: I. cvCi 1^ CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY/SIIE PLAN/PARK^G PLAN indicating the boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access areas, fencing and landscaping features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show all existing facilities, all changes from the previ> os season, and any changes proposed for the duration of the current application. The drawing shall also indicate the locations of winter storage and required winter parking spaces. 2.CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE for the duration of the license period. ?. 4. Copy of your L!.:CD LICENSE APPLICATION. COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. Initial Application @ $300.00 Renewal Application @ $200.00 Late Fee (if not postmarked by March 1) $100.0) TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $ $ 509. REVIEW PROCEDURE When a complete application is received, the City Council will review the license application and will thereafter pass upon the application per the licensing procedures of Chapter S. THE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PUBLIC USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section S.43 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Marina License application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City’s designated employees or agents to enter upon the marina property at any reasonable time to perform safety and code compliance inspections. Page 5 of J miaai I • •. • .* .... . . Itfeo-e. RH?. 1 •• • ■ -r • ♦ • .-| —•• asa.54.— • T^Ty-^rg^.^AB^S5 ' '•• • ‘-TT~~^*r*^^^^rnrVT"^iT7i*^ snae^Aw»'^s^^^ i..*—- . ... .. •: .%».-.•:>•-• • '. - r •:**; .. •• .,•. •^•. • • « PX •: r.a • .. . ...,i rr.-.. * * • /.«*.•» •••• • *. • • .. fe- 3 M ^aamf eiedricdl -S.-A * • • • •• MO^StJt t MittiMttSett 5i I 141LLas: =?5<S;: .v-vca w o.. o CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Ciystal Bay, MN 5S323 Phone 952-249-4600 License Year 2002 City Use Oaly Dale application sent to Marinala 1/17/02 Date application retum^to City "ZltTr/o > Fee Enclosed S ANNUAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION . Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section S.43, Subdivision 2 - Licensed Required. It is unlawful for any persons to engage or participate in business use without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION. REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CTTY CLERK BY MARCH I OF THE LICENSE YEAR. I 1. BUSINESS INFORMATION ^ ^ ^ BUSINESS OR XRADE NAME j Street Address 2. Mailing Address Marina Phon OWNERSHIP/OPERA TION Fee Owner (if different than above) Address W/l\ Phone 3.BUSINESS ORGANIZATION. (Check applicable item) ____ individual ownership ____ partnership List the name of each partiw or corporate officer and corporation le: Name of the marina manage responsible for daily opention: \ List the minimum number of employees on duty when the marina is open to the public during the boating season; I dock attendants t repair or service personnel \__ others available for sales/public information, etc. List every short or long term business occupant of the property other than the Business noted above: Page 1 of S i 4. PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIYITY (Check ill services offered): in-water slip rental 9C sales of boats/motors/trailers/ M marine accessories j boat repair and servicing y on-lMd boat stonaw winter summer OliliSS head pumpout fishing tournament site •<marine fuel sales sale of bait and fishing tackle Conditional Uses ^Conditional Uae Permit Is Reoniredl ____ boat club ______ public boat launching, on-demand ____ public boat launching, transient ____charter boat port-of-call ____caretaker dwelling unit sale of pre-packaged food dive shop clubhouse (for slip or boat club customers) lessons/teaching boat rental sailboard sales/rental iceboat sales/rental ice fishing tackle sales cross-country ski sale/rental 5.BIJSINESS SCHEDULE (Check appropriate items): ^ open all year Lbt proposed hours of _____ open during boating season only dock access: — retail sales & service: 6. MARINA SECURITY is provided by: Caretaker living on site? ration: ^ AMto ^ PM AM to ^ PM iXr n. SLIPS AND BOAT UNITS List the maximum number of boats in each category. Each slip, mooring or other space actually used for storage or keeping of boats or watercraft must be indicated and numbered on the dock and site plan submitted with this application. Company Owned 7.BOATS STORED IN THE WATER (for lake use) At dock slips Total Boats in Water Rental Rental Slips/ Other Total Boats Spaces Boats a.I i 8.BOATS STORED ON LAND FOR LAKE USE Inside Buildings Outside on Racks O a. b. c.Outside - other means Toul Boats Stored on Land for Lake Use JL TOTAL BOATS FOR LAKE USE (Add 7 and 8))S8 Page 2 of S 10.OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (SUMMER) a. Transient boats (repair/service) b. New boats for sale (inventory) c. Used boats fb^Ie (inven^) d. Other ) Inside Building OuU^ 1fiuMiog E 24l Total 11.OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (WINTER) Transient boats (repair/service) Contract sUvage (customer's boats) Inventory (new & used boats) Other (list:____________^_____) Total Inside Buildiny Outside Buildiny a. b. c. d. Total IV. DOCK construction 14.CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: Permanent __ K Wood Wood f: Piling: Decking: Flotation Method (if used): Seasonal Concrete Metal Foam y De-icing normally used Metal ____ Other Other Barreb Other Pgge 3 of S m.OFF-STREET PARKING REOUIREMENTS 12.SUMMER PARKING a.Retail sales/service customers V8 spaces minimum (->-1 per each 800 s.f. over 1,000 s.f.) »spaces b.Boating customers ^ 6 spaces per 10 boats for lake use [.6 x||5o(line *9)]spaces c.Launching ramp customers (day use) 10 spaces minimum per ramp “o spaces d.Charter boat port-of-call 1 space per each 3 seats of gross charter boat capacity [gross charter capacity x 0.33] ” Total spaces requir^ (add a, b, c, & d) ^ spaces o spaces c.1^Total spaces available per attached parking plan spaces 13.WINTER PARKING REQUIRED 20a.0.20 X (line 12e)spaces LICENSE STANDARDS ADVISORY Businesses required to be licensed under Section 5.43 shall be subject to the requirements and performance standards of the B-2 Zoning District and per the following business use license standards: A. Insurance Required. Each business shall provide certification of liability insurance coverage for the duration of the license period. B. I.icenseholder. The primary business operator on the property shall be the licenseholder, and shall be responsible fbr notifying the City of any and all businesses subleased on the premises. Such secondary businesses shall not be separately licensed but shall be allowed only when in conformance with the provisions of the B-2 zoning district standards. C. Operation Standards. Each business licensee shall adhere to the following minimum operation standards: 1) Parking facilities on the site shall be managed so as to eliminate traffic or parking congestion, eliminate illegal on-street parking, and avoid pedestrian traffic through neighboring property. 2) Boat engine testing and charging shall be limited to the hours 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 3) Retail sales and service shall be limited to the hours 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. except as necessary to accommodate normal fishing activity or private use of premises stored boats. 4) The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free of garbage. 5) On land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view obstructions for traffic entering and leaving the site. 6) Parking and on-land storage of boats, trailers, materials and equipment shall be limited to those locations shown on an approved site operation plan, which plan shall be submitted or updated as part of the annual license application. Such site operation plan shall also indicate seasonally variable uses. 7) Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacent properties. Business U<e I.icenses Limited to B-2 Zone. No business use shall be licensed in any zoning district other than B-2, except that when a business use is allowed by ordinance in another zoning district, such use conducted in said district shall not be required to obtain a license. T.icense Revocation. Failure to adhere to the above business use license standards shall be for license suspension or revocation per the provisions of diis chapter. . Page 4 of 5 ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: 1.CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY/Si 11 PLAN/PARKING PLAN indicating the boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access areas, fencing and landscaping features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show all existing facilities, all changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for the duration of the current application. The drawing shall also indicate the locations of winter storage and required winter parking spaces. 2. 3. 4. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURAl^CE COVERAGE for the duration of the license |«m MSr'iU Copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION. COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. Initial Application @ $300.00 Renewal Application @ $200.00 Late Fee (if not postmarked by March 1) $100.0) TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICi« ’'ION $________________ %7aO $________________ REVIEW PROCEDURE When a complete application is received, the City Council will review the license application and will thereafter pass upon the application per the licensing procedures of Chapter S. THE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PUBLIC USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section S.43 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Marina License application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City’s designated employees or agents to enter upon the marina property at any reasonable time to perform safety and code compliance inspections. Authorize Title jtlAJrize^ignatury^^^n^^^l^^aei*Date Relationship to Owner Page 5 of 5 1 >• ••• 'V/ .V^ I . •*/ . ’ !• - • • •• • • fw. .• —• • •• • ■ • • • • • • ••• >5'- .'i ** - - • ••• * • -li. Jk*^“ r. .•.*.• . --u • “ •• • • • ^ AS ■ - - _.»•• •• • •» • m ^ ••• .-/T^y."' "A- ' IS" ;c!rf i* ■• ■/'“ ^X>33s 53CS!i^rs i* • • mm ipp.'wwlw *#’ - i* B»«««*! I !-/><' • 2*P r^\-—»5-— * 0-tS ‘ ! ^^•STO* i ‘ . --------- # •»« •• .•* (At>Pf'tVX> pfiorK U<8i^ //J (jHiciI uJ*A AM*0V/«^ jp^iou^lC,Z.Z ftft. VA*IAMC*S^ / sSO /\{AE/A<A ...:; •. — *v •«•.—..».■ . ::" r*i • • • • • • Z^:'^^Z£~jSILA‘ bA^J^lgSQgtoe=g-/gg^^ ^------------------------------------ 30 »•:jtCs2SXL *Hdfi3aS2.aoi.—'. ,-.i^ ----------e>—_^. f Sp)«Ar«rf' •v-^: ‘.-ii 1 ftk^' • • - . « -----.^—- I •••••s /ilrtDCe>W./<^"f «« /)*7S‘ .* 7r•^so' • ^50“Srt>* ; •r^r<t/\ii. ' P/MJ /“s so' X** >• i•r • ^ ;• •//'C • * I * / ^ 4 ' / /<|l A I—III r«»» SMTK6 mui.bi»iC> ^ 4 tfA »s » H M H <« » ■4 I II r/ iV-; I «Jr •• • • ^ • • •• •_____________ • •• ♦• i(ii « W 1 ^st> lr*4l-i •••••* *• ~t-----il----- ' - — I\1 - * fi/«4 —:— /i?,V ” • • • • *••« %* <5'’ % •• • • • • • •✓••I<ii i^Attocwtft. ftA 11f IS /’//*•* /)-7s* : 7^•^so* .' esc'-s^^' • • •• • • :x I i I I 4 ::>'h III ^^iI -SO I 5 ST»<2A€r€ At>miSti pfiofK m((filTS /AJ VAit.,yA/»/Y.,-^&23/ ^^)H^cK uuAs /vr/>2o\/(jtk re«.’ |S.cSOG4:|r-/^2.S Tc:»(2. 5cA\/ic£ ^vUt-b/zuG Urr&/\c>lc. €x llAfiticjoMttl •I irt •» :v»» fJi*. is • w • annual c Municipal C persons to < therefor firon PLEASE COW ATTACHMENTi OF THE LICEh 1. BUSINESS I 1. BUSINESS O Street Addres Mailing Addr Marina Phom 2. OWNEBSHIP Fee Owner (i Address. 3. BUSINESS 0 indiv List the nam< J)oLU&,i Name of the Htmi List the mini the boating s i__ dock othei List every si above: /L m CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone 952-249-4600 License Year 2002 City Use Only Date application sent to Marina 1/17/02 Date application retuin^ to City 'Z/t.sy^s Fee Enclosed $ 1/1 7/d: ^1* W* aw ANTi^AL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION - Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section S.43, Subdivision 2 - Licensed Required. It is unlawful for any persons to engage or participate in business use without fint having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION. REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS. AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY MARCH I OF THE LICENSE YEAR. L 1. BUSINESS INFORMATION BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME /y^ Street Address JOjF . /jJA*^Pj Mailing Address _________________________________________________________ Office Phone 9^^*^ "jhinCiMarina Phone ^“7J "yc^OO OWNERSHIP/OPERA TION Fee Owner (if different than above) fYlOUXtu* ! I .ftt. .Tr>/o 3. Address AJu^PfPf UMA^Tn Phone ^lSA^7J 7000 BUSINESS ORGANIZATION: (Check applicable item) individual ownership ____ partnership ___ corporation List the name uf each partner or corporate officer and their title: Name of the marina manager responsible for daily operation: Atu/jn List the minimum number of employees on duty when the marina is open to the public during the boating season: / dock attendants repair or service personnel ^ others available for sales/public information, etc. List every short or long term business occupant of the property other than the Business noted above: ________________________________________________ Page 1 of 5 4. PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY (Check all services offered); Principal Uses in-water slip rental Acccaiorv U«ci y sales of boats/motors/trailers/ . marine accessories ^ boat repair and servicing ^ on-land boat storage vf winter ^ summer y** marine fuel sales ____ sale of bait and fishing tackle Conditional Uses fCondidonal Use Permit ii Rcoulredl ____boat club ____public boat launching, on-demand ____public boat launching, transient ____charter boat port-of-call ____caretaker dwelling unit head pumpout fishing tournament site sale of pre-packaged food dive shop clubhouse (for slip or boat club customers) iessons/teaching boat rental sailboard sales/rental iceboat sales/rental ice fishing tackle sales cross-country ski sale/rei!tal 5.BUSINESS SCHEDULE (Check appropriate items): open all year Lbt proposed hours of operetioB: ____ open during boating season only dock access: AM to >^*^PM retail sales & service: 9:^ AM to ^1^0 PM 6.MARINA SECURITY is provided by: Caretaker living on site? A/c n. SLIPS AND BOAT UNITS List the maximum number of boats in each category. Each slip, mooring or other space actually used for storage or keeping of boats or watercraft must be indicated and numbered on the dock and site plan submitted with this application. 7.BOATS STORED IN THE WATER (for lake use) At dock slips Total Boats in Water a Company Rental Rental Slips/ Other Total Owned Boats Spaces Boats S 77 77 8 BOATS STORED ON LAND FOR UKE USE a.Inside Buildings b.Outside on Racks c.Outside - other means Total Boats Stored on Land for Lake Use TOTAL BOATS FOR UKE USE (Add 7 and 8)M- Page 2 of 5 10.OTHER BOATS OS PREMISES (SUMMER) a. Transient boats (repair/service) b. New boats for sale (inventory) c. Used boats for sale (inventory) d. Other (list:_________________) Total Inside Building Outside Building Ml. Total 11.OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (WINTER) a. Transient boats (repair/service) Contract storage (customer's boats) Inventory (new & used boats) Other (list:___________]_____) Total b. c. d. Inside Building Ml- Outside Building (ML 7^ aM Total OL-OFF^TREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS 12.SUMMER PARKING a.Retail sales/service customers 8 spaces minimum (-•'I per each 800 s.f. over 1,000 s.f.) »spaces b.Boating customers 6 spaces p.:r 10 boats for lake use [.6 x 9)] »spaces c.Launching ramp customers (day use) 10 spaces minimum per ramp *=spaces d.Charter boat port-of-call I space per each 3 seats of gross charter boat capacity [gross charter capacity x 0.33] “7^spaces c.Total spaces required (add a, b, c, & d) spaces Total spaces available per attached parking plan spaces 13.WINTER PARKING REQUIRED a.0.20 X (line I2e)spaces IV. DOCK CONSTRUCTION • 14. CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: X Peimanent Seasonal X De-icins normallv used Pilinss: X Wood Concrete X Metal Other Decking: ^ Wood MettI Other Flotation Method (if used):Foam Barrels X Other Pige 3 Of 5 W 'I*! LICENSE STANDARDS ADVISORV Businesses required to be licensed under Section S.43 shall be subject to the requirements and performance standards of the B-2 Zoning DisUict and per the following business use license standards: A.Insurance Required. Each business shall provide certification of liability insurance coverage for the duration of the license period. B.Licenseholder. The primary business operator on the property shall be the licenseholder, and shall be responsible for notifying the City of any and all businesses subleased on the prei 'zes. Such secondary businesses shall not be separately licensed but shall be allowed only when in conformance with the provisions of the B-2 zoning district standards. C.Operation Standards. Each business licensee shall adhere to the following minimum operation standards: Parking facilities on the site shall be managed so as to eliminate traffic or parking congestion, eliminate illegal on-street parking, and avoid pedestrian traffic through neighboring property. Boat engine testing and charging shall be limited to the hours 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Retail sales and serv ice shall be limited to the hours 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. except as necessary to accommodate normal fishing activity or private use of premises stored boats. 4) 5) The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free of garbage. On land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view obstructions for trafTic entering and leaving the site. Parking and on-land storage of boats, trailers, materials and equipment shall be limited to those locations shown on an approved site operation plan, which plan shall be submitted or updated as part of the annual license application. Such site operation plan shall also indicate seasonally variable uses. Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacent properties. Business Use Licenses Limited to B-2 Zone. No business use shall be licensed in any zoning district other than B-2, except that when a business use is allowed by ordinance in another zoning district, such use conducted in said district shall not be required to obtain a license. License Revocation. Failure to adhere to the above business use license standards shall be cause for license suspension or revocation per the provisions of this chapter. Ptige 4 of 5 t . ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: 1.CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY/SITE PLAN/PARKING PLAN indicating the boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access areas, fencing and landscaping features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show all e.xisting facilities, all changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for the duration of the current application. The drawing shall also indicate the locations of winter storage and required winter parking spaces. 2.CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE for the duration of the license period. 3. Copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION. 4.COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. Initial Application @ S300.00 Renewal Application @ S200.00 Late Fee (if not postmarked by March 1) SI00.0) TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION REVIEW PROCEDURE When a complete application is received, the City Council will review the license application and will thereafter pass upon the application per the licensing procedures of Chapter S. THE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PUBLIC USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY IHET:ITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.43 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Marina License application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City's designated employees or agents to enter upon the marina property at any reasonable time to perform safety and code compliance inspections. Authorized Signature Pate. Title Relationship to Owner Page S of S lOata A ___ - J ^ T*. . *v.*..**:v - W?f •_■ • 97.00 .♦. E90.4I Morih £|Tt^ 0?eH^TfO/^ 91.21 ' _____Zi/CJ-----i|^irT:=rrrifc§^ S^T-t " • •• •••• m ^ • ••••* •• • •• -•V/ A • •./ •7 sCiilv••• /;^'•' y§Z ••t: • *«» V ..T > r. .: • fi ^ . • ** ***T • * • • -I ^ • .. COHCRtTS • • • - Tv*.. # • • * sv»>a • •* • t- NV »V asi^m \\\.••••. ••. K, . • • • m few EXHIBIT B LICENSE I 00-105 ----f-. — 1 “_ _ » • V « i viM ^“5 S’t*-- ^‘-'7 Dili St>">atV • • ) .^EiUrms s>irt!;m —•'. • • At ••. .'V*‘'’“ .*^.'.,' b?*I • ••• • ^» / . . • . . • *^*i * '■ ~ OCC»i rSjn i\ A \ ■s.'V 42^ z. . line r ood porollel y Xy.y#;oo ; o>tcS 201 lO.I, 35- 3^ 33 a A 33- ipWMl m SWMiaS W:r#T<•TWH '5 “33-£)2. : A-hrtJ. 0/lon/r ii I'^loedr » I VdW«a ^ (jd-*) X^UAv>p5ti>U) wsiftjZ^'ib hu Lx") Vs/iMliU »/VMI aJ^ lU-pS^ q3 ^ Cii/Ywavdb ujumL Aj/wn » biOTbd>^xilfu^aruLJ ^e^3lfl)oL^^xb©iit ) KXfliidLrte hucolk^iiJL ^L/r>jL ./5t5^®-^L> Obctj jXi^^cfcr« (3") oruL/ ^p0bgJk,g^(j^gll&o^/~^ ^j^M<jL ^i.aa^ lo'’ O^XC^nTr? _ /vuKthiAA^ lo'’ ^^oua ^ O/TV^ bloc^t^rvq Ov^JL .'VvaACftJUrtvj^^ jn->jdb2AlAll^ oTu^ ^ ^ /ijyL» x^dtWcfe/ OMa^ • ^iO* ^6/3:bafiluJ ijia ^a-cir\ j^!{Jjb ^ a^iodUicjJ Cur^A ^ocK,<^Kcui4 yty\ssJb )^13^YYVyiM.^^rnaAlA^ ^ UMe. L«; ^vrvAjdLMo j BXH, *2_ 9 CITY of ORONO Municipal Offices Strati Addrats: 27S0 Ksllsy Parkway Orono, MN S5356 MaBifli Addrass: P.O. Box 66 CrysUI Bay. MN 553234)066 June 27.2002 DavidBriggs Wayzata Marine 3324 North Shore Drive Wayzata. MN 55391 Dear Mr. Briggs: As you know, the City has been following up on a number of complaints by your neighbor to the east regarding the marina operation. The attached letter is the City’s response to the neighbor’s complaints. It is our conclusion that while certain of the complaints can and should be resolved, others fall into the realm of legal nonconformities which the City will not pursue until or unless the marina is redeveloped or you choose to commence one of the conditional uses allowed in the B-2 Zoning District for which a Conditional Use Permit is required. Therefore, the City is directing that you take immediate action to resolve the outstanding issues, as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Repair the fence along the east side of the property, as we discussed on June 10, as required per Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subd. 15(G)(5). Lower the stack of stored blocking materials along the east boundary to be no more than 6 ’ in height, and no closer than 5' to the east lot boundary. Continue to store ail such materials in an orderly fashion on the site, and at least 5' from the east lot boundary. Continue to keep the site in a neat and orderly manner per Code Section 10.41, Subd. 11(F). Remove the stored dock floats and any other miscellaneous materials that are stored within 5 feet of the easterly lot boundary. Continue to maintain a 5-foot setback from the east boundary for storage of all materials, including boats. To the extent that debris from the marina finds its way to the adjoining property, remove that debris as soon as you become aware of it. Immediately complete the replacement and conversion of the exterior lighting system to direct sources of light away from the adjoining property, as required per Code Sections 10.41, Subd. 11(C) and 5.43 Subd. 5(C). This was to have been completed by June 10, but we continue to receive complaints that the situation is worse than ever. Tdephooe (952)2494(00 • Fu (952) 2494614 www4d.oroiMMBn.w TT David briggs June 27,2002 Page 2 6. It is our understanding that you have turned off all exterior paging system q>eakeis as dirMted, per Code Section 9.24; we also understood your attorney was going to review the ordinance. The City’s conclusion regarding Ordinance Section 9.24 Subd. 3(C) is that loudspeaker noise that is “loudly audibIe...so as to disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of any person n^y“ with respect to the adjacent property is noise that is louder than a normal conversation being conducted on the marina side of the fence. Therefore, regarding the ^ speakers inside the shop area which are audible outside the marina building when the * overhead garage door is open, ^u arc directed to reduce the volume of the interior speakers so that the volume received by the adjacent property is not “loudly audible** as described above. Sgt. Erickson will continue to woric with you as necessary on this issue. I would again note that we are generally satisfied with the overall operation of the marina, and request that you take the above noted actions to resolve the outstanding issues. Please contact me at 952-249*4600 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Michael P. Gaffil^n' Planning Director end. »a exH. a ^■s>-c>z. GITYor ORONO Municipal Offices Stnst Address: 27S0 Kelley Perkway Ofono, MN 55356 HaiHai Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0065 Robert Waade 3286 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN SS391 Re: Your Complaints Regarding Wayzata Marine Dear Mr. Waade Thank you for your memo of May 22 regarding issues you wish resolved in regards to the Wayzata Marine property. First of all, it appears that a majority of the issues you have noted are operational issues, Nshich require ongoing action by the marina, as opposed to physical issues which are only resolved by a change to the physical aspects of the marina. Certain conditions at the marina are viewed by the City as legal nonconformities because those conditions pre-date codes which might address them. Consequently, the City will not take action on certain items because of their legally nonconforming status. The following addresses your list in the order you presented the issues: 1) Dumpstffmeeds to be shielded *. Code Section 10.41, Subd. 1 1(G) requires that dumpsters be “screened so as to not be visible off-site ”. This language was added to the ordinance in 1995. The absence of pro.\imate dumpster screening is a pre-existing legally nonconforming condition for this marina. The existing dumpsters on the property are located on the east side of the building. They are screened by the building on the west, by the 6’ high property line fence on the east, and are located approximately halfway between the lake and the road, such that at most times during most seasons they are not clearly visible from the lake or the road. These dumpsters are in one of the least visible locations possible on the site. Further, the only additional screening the City might require if this code was enforced for existing businesses, would be a 5-6’ high fence along the north and south sides of the dumpster. It is our opinion that this would not have a significant impact on views of the dumpster firom off-site. The City has not required other existing marinas to make physical changes to the site to screen their dumpsters absent a redevelopment of the marina. If and when Wayzata Marine makes application for site redevelopment, the City would at that time incorporate dumpster screening into any approval. Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249-4616 <nfrwxl4>rono4nn.us I 1 Robert Waade June 27,2002 Page 2 2) “Fence needs repairing”. Code Section 10.03, Subd. 15(G)(5) requires that the owner of a fence shall maintain it in a condition of reasonable repair and appearance and shall not allow it to become or remain in disrepair or in a dangerous condition. Inspection of the marina’s fence along your lot line confirmed one location where a board was damaged and partially missing. Mr. Briggs has agreed to repair this section of fence. 3) “Cement and wood blocks, which are scattered about, need to be collected and stored out of sight ” Code Section 10.41, Subd. 11(F) requires that “persons in charge shall at all times keep the docksr sea walls, and premises in a neat and orderly manner and free from trash, rubbish, repair parts, machinery, equipment and debris of all kinds.” City inspection of the site on June 10 found it to be in a generally orderly condition. While there were a few items of blocking materials next to some boats stored on the site, the majority of such was stacked approximately 5’ from the east lot line, about 50' back from North Shore Drive, and about 8' high. Because the top of this stack was likely visible from the upper windows of the adjoining duplex, the marina owner was directed that this stack be lowered to a maximum height of 6' to make it no higher than the fence. Blocking materials of wood or concrete are likely to be used on an ongoing basis in certain areas of the marina site. The City does not find the current storage of such materials on the site to be visually offensive. 4) “Boats are parked too close to fence, within 1 O' setback, and create a firi» ^ayarH” The Orono Fire Marshal has indicated that as long as a fire lane is maintained around the building, there is no specific requirement for a fire lane around the perimeter of the site; also that there is no specified fire hazard to buildings which are 20' or more from combustibles. All of the buildings on your property are more than 20* from the lot line except a comer of your house which is 15' from the line. Boats stored on the site appeared to be set back a few feet from the easterly fence, and it is my understanding that the fence is approximately one foot onto the marina side of the lot line. The City’s conclusion is that the boats are not creating a definable fire hazard. 5) “Debris and blocking and miscellaneous materials are in side setback areag *Th<» only materials found in the 5’ side buffer/setback area (see item 6) was a stack of dock floats which the marina owner is being required to move to be at least 5' from the side lot line. 6) “10* setbacks on each side, as well as the front and back, should meet requirements of landscaping”. The absence of landscaping areas meeting the minimum widths defined by code Section 10.41 Subd. 10 is considered as a legal nonconforming situation for this marina. A marina has existed at this site since prior to 1962 when the City began to license marinas. In December 1974 the City established landscaping standards for marinas. The City in a 1975 Operations Agreement with North Star Marina, Inc. (one of the predecessors to Wayzata Marine) established an undefined width landscape area along the east boundary of the site, and required that certain plantings be completed within four years. Along the west boundary a 3' landscape area was established. The plantings along the cast boundary were at least in part completed, as evidenced by a number of existing mature tall arborvitae along the fence today. However, a 5’ buffer has been all that the City has attempted to maintain along the east boundary in the last 20 years. The site has been paved to within 5’ of the east lot line for many years, with wooden border timbers still existing along the edge of the pavement. Some of the 5' buffer is vegetated, much of it is not. The City has not required i . Robert Waade June 27.2002 Page 3 more than a 5' buffer for this marina, and will not attempt to enforce anything more than a S' buffer until/unless this marina re-develops. For the record, note that just prior to Wayzata Marine acquiring this property, the previous owner Mr. Dunn was required by the City Council to install the 6' fence to ad^ss your concerns regarding trespass, trash and screening. In 1995 the City revised the B-2 standards, and a significant change was that certain marina activities became allowed only via Conditional Use Permit, and a CUP would not be issued until the landscape standards were met. This marina has not commenced any of the uses requiring a CUP, hence there has been no impetus for them to upgrade their landscaping. 7) “Remove marina debris from Waade Dropertv^*. During the June 10 inspection the marina owner was directed that to the extent debris from the marina finds its way to the Waade property, the marina is responsible for removal of that debris. 8) "Lights need covers and paging systems need to cease ”. Code Section 10.41 Subd. IIC requires that lighting shall be shielded so that no direct glare can be seen from adjoining residences, from the lake or from the roadway. The date of installation of the three lights which are the subject of your complaint is unclear. However, because shielding of lighting is also addressed as a licensing operation standard in Section 5.43 Subd. 5C, the lighting is not considered as a legal nonconformity. Therefore, the City has advised the marina owner to s' leld the 3 lights. He has chosen to install replacement lighting that will direct light downward ulher than outward. Replacement of the three existing offending light fixtures was underway on June 10. The marina owner indicated it would take a few days to finalize the installation and then orient the lights to avoid shining into your property. It is our understanding that the lighting is as of this writing not resolved. The City will be following this up immediately. Sgt. Kurt Erickson of the Orono Police Dept, has been in contact with the marina regarding the paging system (addressed under the City’s noise ordinance. Section 9.24). The marina has been directed to turn off all exterior speakers, which we believe has been done, and which the marina owner agreed to do at least until his attorney has reviewed the ordinance. The ordinance states that loudspeaker noise that is “loudly audible" is a violation of the ordinance. The City’s determination regarding noise that is “loudly audible" is noise that is louder than a normal conversation being conducted on the marina side of the fence. Therefore, regarding the speakers inside the shop area which are audible outside the marina building when the overhead garage door is open, the owner is being directed to reduce the volume of the interior speakers so that the volume received by your property is not “loudly audible". Sgt. Erickson will continue to work with »he marina as necessary on this issue. Robert Waade June 27.2002 Page 4 Insununaiy: * the marina will not be retjuired to further screen the dumpsters; • the marina will be requir^ to repair the fence; - as long as blocking materials are neatly sUcked in a location not visible fiom eye level on the adjoining property, the City is satisfied with such storage; - the marina will be required to recover any debris on your property that camg from the marina; - the marina will not be required to do additional plantings or screening, nor maintain more than a 5' side setback/landscape buffer along the east boundary; - the marina will not be required to make revisions to the fiont, side or lakeshore landscape areas until or unless the marina is redeveloped or a CUP is applied for. - at such future time the marina redevelops or a CUP is applied for, the landscaping issue will be addr^ed; at that time as an abutting property owner you would be notified of the public hearing required as part of the review process for those applications; - the City will continue to pursue resolution of the 3 offending lights and the paging system as described above. We trust that this is the information you have been requesting. Sincerely, Michael P. Gaffron Planning Director cc:Ron Moorse, City Administrator Lyle Oman, Building Official Bill Meyer, Fire Marshal Tom Barrett, City Attorney Ken Potts, Prosecuting Attorney Sgt. Kurt Erickson, Orono Police III' III k Memorandum To: From: Date: Subject: Ron Moorse — ^ Correy Farniok September 4.2002 Wayzaa Marine On September 3.2002.1 stopped in at 3286 North Shore Drive to assess the lightinj; conditions that is overflowing from the Wayzata Marine. I was in the area from 8:43 pm to 9:12 pm. I spoke to the homeowner of 3286 North Shore Drive Mr. Waade and advised him I would be on his property for a short period of time to check the lighting situation. Wayzata Marine • 5 recessed above the front enterance - Has no spill over to 3286 North Shore Dr. - I box light front right corner • Has no spill over to 3286 North Shore Drive • 2 box lights on right side of building • lights are on poles that are approx. I -2 feet above the roof line of the building. These light are tilted at a very slight angle upward. These lights do cause spill over to the area of 3286 North Shore Drive. If lights were tilted straight down, this may reduce some of the light spill over. • 2 box lights on left side of building • Has no spill over to 3286 North Shore Drive. - 2 Lights on the rear of building. Lights are elevated above the roof line of the building and are angled at a approx. 45 degree angle. Light from these two can be seen at a very great disunce and illuminates the upper story of the house at 3286 North Shore Drive and other houses in the area. - 2 lights on a pole in the left rear of the property. One light hces toward the front and an amber light faces toward the lake. These lights cause little light spill over to the property of 3286 North Shore Drive. taadm i . These were the only lights that were being used. No pole lights other than the one near the access were In use. Atnched In an aerial photo and a rough diagram of the property and the light that were In use when I was In the area. The shaded area on the diagram is were the main focus of the li|ht hits on the proper^, but does not represent the light that is spilled over to other areas. ! i d • • \ • j *«i : > (7^*. • • ! »‘l t •* I w I .. • • •• ^i9^m - • m • X \ \ • ^ w % \* 3 |i J • % i y R:,K»\ ■\ I • ^ , . • • Vi C .V MapQucsl: Maps: print Page 1 of 1 3286 Northshore Dr Wayzata, MN 55391-9357, US rr HUM Pack * •* I'l •* Vi' iii • • " ! •• .ri-i' • - -I . ^ . ng ,■__ nr- ^ ‘ . • • • " V > Vi?. v,wxv-:v^ • f r . :•>?■• 1 »if • I m■’s- IV A t % 2002 Globe^lorer. Kod^ 0^: ■f5-' i • »* ^ V cc1 Mi \PqUEST I CSck H«r» ^r.va: • 2 f.ia-p . .• V::ces ' ;‘'ts rese%r yprint.aJp’in.i|\i.ita=.itb\.SDt'> AodoBi‘>t!l I /.:\ !\''ivi /i)nV“-«2fAL \l):l . i2ftBeOSATQ19/3'2002 SEP 0 9 2002 OUYU^ OHONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: September 4,2002 ITEM NO; ip Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Proposed 2003 Budget and Tax Levy Attachments: 1. Tax Levies*Actual 2002 vs. Proposed 2003 2. Tax Capacity, Local Levy, and Tax Capacity Rates 3. Effect of 2003 Tax Levy and Budget on Property Owners 4. Resolution Adopting the Proposed 2002 Tax Levy Collectible in 2003 5. Resolution Adopting the Proposed 2003 Budget Proposed 2003 Budget The proposed 2003 budget reflects an effort to limit expenditures in order to comply with a state- imposed levy limit, as well as to deal with other limited revenues, while maintaining current service levels and providing fimding for upcoming fire equipment and facility needs. General Fund Budget The proposed 2003 General Fund budget expenditures are $4,712,880. This is an increase of $105,283, or 2.28% over the 2002 budget. While the proposed budget reflects necessary expenditure increases related to items such as annual compensation adjustments, fire service costs, enhanced information technology, and motor fuel; the small overall expenditure increase was made possible by a number of significant reductions in other expenditure items. The most significant expenditure reduction resulted from the elimination of two staff positions. Tax Lew. Tax Rate, and Impact on Property Owners The total tax levy required to fund the proposed 2003 budget is $3,098,400. This is an increase of $172,065, or 5.88% over the 2002 Levy. This increase is necessary both to fund the General Fund budget expenditures, and to provide funding for upcoming fire equipment and facility needs. The estimated tax capacity for taxes payable in the year 2003 is $15,549,329. This is an increase of $1,701,834, or 12.29% over the 2002 tax capacity. Based on the City’s increased tax capacity and the proposed tax levy, the tax capacity rate will be 19.809%. This is a reduction of 5.49% from the 2002 tax capacity rate. The reduction in the tax capacity rate will result in a minimal increase in the City’s share of the property tax bill. Assuming a 10% increase in a home ’s property value, the City’s share of the property tax bill will increase 4%. For a home valued at $200,000, this is an increase of $16.60. For a home valued at $350,000, the increase is $29.05. For a home valued at $500,000 the increase is liiamiai r. $41.49. CITY OF ORONO TAX LEVIES ACTUAL 2002 vs PROPOSED 2003 TAX LEVY COLLECTIBLE INCREASE TAX LEVIES 2002 2003 (DECREASE) General Infrastructure (PIR) Park Land Acquisition and Development Equipment Acquisition (Imp & Equip O/L) $2,381,655 (a) 35,450 5,000 90,000 $2,509,684 (a) 35,450 5,000 0 $128,029 0 0 (90,00m TOTAL LEVY SUBJECT TO LEVY LIMIT 2,512,105 2,550,134 38,029 Special Levies; General Fund - PERA Rate Increases General Fund • COPS Grant Decrease General Fund • CapiUiI Equipment Cert. 1992 Improvement Bond Debt Service 1997 Improvement Bond Debt Service 1999 Improvement Bond Debt Service 2000 Improvement Bond Debt Service 1998 HRA Refunding Bond Debt Service Fire Facility and Equipment Bond Debt Service 4,830 (a) 35,400 (a) 50.000 (a) 45.000 15.000 14.000 -0- 250,000 4,980 (a) 14,786 (a) 75.000 (a) 45.000 15.000 15,500 -0- 250.000 128.000 150 (20,614) 25,000 0 0 1,500 0 0 128,000 TOTAL SPECIAL LEVIES 414,230 548,266 134,036 TOTAL TAX LEVIES FOR ALL PURPOSES $2,926,335 $3,098.400 $172,065 NOTE! Levy limits were reinititited by the 2001 Legislatare. Total General Faad 2,47IJ»5 (a) 2,604,450 (a)I32J65 IVDCrr2HATuUn«_liaiLlU PERCENT CHANGE 5.38% 0.00% 0.00% 1.51% 3.11% •58.23% 50.00% 0.00% 0.00% 10.71% 0.00% 0.00% 32.36% 5.88% SJ6% > ‘ u. »■ wiTitfai ffi* psp^.-' Sm '■ } '• J ■. i ..' . 0 . v'V •r • '• <i ■j ^ t- ‘ ■*<4’ '• .'ti- tmM ^ . City of Orono Tax Capacity, Local Levy, & Tax Capacity Rates TAX CAPACITY Real Estate Personal Property Deduct Tax Increments Deduct Contrib Fiscal Disp Add Distribution Fiscal Disp Net Tax Capacity (To calculate rate) LOCAL LEVY Total levy all funds TAX CAPACITY RATES General Revenue PIR lnlhatucture*Storm Sewer / Roads Parks - Land Acquisition ft Development Improve ft Equip - Capital Equipment Debt Service HRA Building Bonds Fire Facility ft Equipment Bonds Debt Total Local Tax Capacity Rate ai)KITVjMl\TAXCAfl.lU 17.705% 0.254% 0.036% 0.645% 0.529% 1.791% 0.000% 16.651% 0.227% 0.032% 0.000% 0.483% 1.598% 0.818% 20.960%19.809% A-2 2003 Over OJnder) 2002 -1.054% -0.027% •0.004% -0.645% •0.046% -0.193% 0.818% •1.151% Actual Estimated 2002 2003 Amount Percent $13,847,495 $15,549,329 $1,701,834 12.29% 109,057 110,057 1,000 0.92% 0 0 0 0.00% (211,708)(237,708)(26,000)12.28% 195,732 219,732 24,000 12.26% $13,940,576 $15,641,411 $1,700,835 12.20% $2,926,335 $3,098,400 $172,065 M. , ---------------,-r 5.88% -5.95% -10.77% •11.20% 100.00% -8.75% •10.76% -5.49% •, • Vi • City of Orono Effect of 2003 Tax Levy & Budget on Homes Market Valee for 2002 Taici |20Q^imi m.2m 5% incr 2m lOVoincr I :mi 2003 5% incr r I Eitiiated Market Valae ms,$1I0.<ms^im Tax Capacity (Net) *2,000 2,100 2,200 3,500 3,675 Tax Capacity Rate 20.960% 19.809% 19.809% Net Tax $419.20 $415.99 $$ Increase (Decrease) from 2002 % Increase (Decrease) from 2002 ($3.21) -0.8% $435.80 $16.60 4.0% $733.60 H $727.98 ($5.62) •0.8% * 2002 Tax Capacity (net) 1% of first $500,000 market value, plus 1.25% of all value over $500,000 2003 Tax Capacity (net) > 1% of first $500,000 market value, plus 1.25% of all value over $500,000 auocri\iMaTAXcmc.iu A-3 I-.; 2003 10% incr i $367,500 $385,000 1 ' 3,850! 20.960% 19.809% 19.809% i-’ I t I $762.65 ! $29.05 4.0% I •. • r $500.000 2002 2003 2003 5% incr 10% incr im S221I $550,000 5,000 20.960% $1,048.00 5,250 5,500 19.809% 19.809% $1,039.97 $1,089.50 ($8.03) $41.49 -0.8%4.0% .-III A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PROPOSED 2002 TAX LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 2003 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, that the following sums be levied for the current year, collectible in 2003 upon the taxable property in the City of Orono, for the following purposes: General Fund - Operating PIR Fund - Infrastructure Replacement (Road) Park Fund - Land Acquisition and Development G.O. Sewer Improvement Bond 1992 G.O. Improvement Bond 1997 Public Facilities Revenue Refunding Bond 1998 - HRA G.O. Improvement Bond 1999 Fire Facility and Equipment Bond Debt Service $2,604,450 35,450 5,000 45.000 15.000 250.000 15,500 128.000 TOTAL ALL LEVIES $3,098,400 The City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified cof^ of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held September 9,2002. ATTEST:Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Tom\IUM<<Mow>rrapoMd 2003 Levy wpd • ( 1 \' ) : ! n i • i % ■‘4 = III A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE PROPOSED 2003 GENERAL FUND BUDGET BE IT RESOLVED, by Ihe City Council of the City ofOrono, County of Hennepin, Minnesota that the proposed 2003 General Fund budget is determined to be as follows: GENERAL FUND ESTIMATED REVENUES Taxes • General S 2.604,430 Special Assosments - Licenses and Permits 362,320 Intergovenunental 226,410 Charges for Services U08,800 Finn and Forfeits 111,300 Interest Income 72,000 Miscellaneous 27,200 Transfers From Other Funds - Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources S 4,712,880 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES General Government $966,690 Public Safety 2,703,610 Street Maintenance 349,790 Parks and Recreation 63,070 Recycling Program 82,000 Engineering • Unallocated 10,370 Reimbursable Expenditures 70,130 Special Proj,:cts and Contingency 60,000 C^iud Outlay 102,000 Transfers To Other Funds 103,000 Toul Expenditures and Other Financing Uses S 4.7I2.M0 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held September 9.2002. ATTEST: Barbara Peterson, Mayor Linda S.Vee, City Clerk •pMIU REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION SEP 0 9 2002 cn y Oh ohuvo DATE: Scptcnbcr 4,200Z ITEM NO: Department Approval: Nanc RooMoorse THk City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: ______________ Agenda Section: City Adminimators Re^ Item Description: Selection of Dates for Truth in Taxation Hearings All local taxing jurisdictions are required to hold both an initial hearing regarding their annual budget and a subsequent hearing at wMch the final budget is adopted. These hearings are held in late November or early December. Because the hearings cannot conflict among the taxing jurisdictions, there are only a small number of potential dates available to the City. The dates are shown on the attached calendar. It is recommended that the initial hearing be set for 5:30 p.m. on Monday, December 2, and the contin;iation or subsequent hearing be scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on Monday, December 9. Council Action Requested Motion to select dates and times for the Truth in Taxation hearings regarding the 2003 budget. ^ H ill / )ecemher 2002 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRl SAT I 2 X X X 6 7 nAMLHAm»DAtmi 8 9 X 1X A X 13 14 15 X \ 18 20 • 21 22 •NvrrMMiM 23 2/\ 25^ ONMtnMt 26 MMMOCMrCAMOA USTOuAMm 2 7 28 29 f • 30 i 31 • NOVEMBER 8 M T W T r S 1 2 3 4 S • 7 8 t 10 11 12 13 14 11 14 17 If If 20 21 21 23 24 28 2f 27 2f 20 30 • JANUARY t H T W T Ft 12 3 4 i • 7 • • 10 11 12 13 M 11 It 17 10 It 20 21 22 23 14 2S 3t 27 21 2t 30 31 • # UMtMiUtA. --------.cfUGQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 5£P 0 9 2002 Cm V uHORONU DATE: September 4,2002 ITEM NO: % Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Naae RooMoorse U/i A}City Aifaninistratot's TUlc City Administrator Report Item Description: Payment Requests-T^ng Lake Fire Station The City has received five invoices for payment for work related to the fire station. The invoices are as follows: •The Construction Bulletin in the amount of $264.69 •GME Consultants for construction observation and testing services in the amount of $2,720.35 BKV Group, for architectural services in the amount of $7,098.65 -SEH for engineering services related to the final plat of the fire station property in the amount of $526.24, to be funded 50% from the Joint Fire Account and 50% by the City -SEH in the amount of $401.00, to be fiuided 50% from the Joint Fire Account, and 50% by the City. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the requests for payment as follows: The Construction Bulletin in the amount of $264.69, GME Consultants in the amount of $2,720.35, and BKV Group, in the amount of $7,098.65 to be funded from the Joint Fire Account; and SEH in the amounts of $526.24 and $401.00, to be funded 50% from the Joint Fire Account, and 50% by the City. ■ i 11 ii'Jliaiii • • •••«• mm mm •••• Rc£<I Business Information- Duplicate Conatructlon Bulletin Bill To: CITY OF LONG LAKe AHN: MCHIrlU MOnsC 1flS4AAmCAVE U)NO lAKf, MN O0MOfltM BNATONUHStfl BivoiesoATe MVOieeMiKiiEfi 0818M 04030002 fOSTSli iNVOICB Bogoleri Ptoost Bifoet qiMOdono to: PMONC: (Ml) 8«Gf MS PAX: (TtQ BS7-1SS3 AOvnniAin: cnYOfioNOiAKr. Atn OOfMTAUCnON BULUTIN MAOAZIN6 LC0ALA08-408100, MARCH 1.8000 tlXR WWWTHCr QROeS AMOUNT PX).NUMBIR:1S1S.01 OROmt:fiMC3 159 • PCRUNE-.00ei6 RATE IX 5261.69 • o • m—0^ S264JBS ommatotau _ AO OATTlOrl; LONO UKTjtfN NSW PIRE STATION PROJeCT M8£SAOC:a-14ai* S-sa^-l-OOi** TOTAL AMOUNT PAVAMJIM UA PATMIMTeUBDAn S364.M I MU-TOMUMPaR M1M4| AOFNCV OOMMIttON OlSALLOWSO Anren ao days miomths oatb of mvo MaDTe; ASSOC ooNumpueL /cmo A. O.OOX 000141 AlUNTAiOAOIIOOUSA DAIS 04080008 I INVOIClMUMBgW TOTAL MVO«S AMOUNT OUK AAVABUM UADOUARS WinTo: PMST UNION ATlANTA.aA800B8U8A BANK ROUrwO NUMBER 0110008X7 S2S4.S9 VtSA-MC. AMCX CAaTOlLSBEE (•00)416^4 itm I'l' A pMNen of RNO BNMOr. m WOMWOBn St. NMMfl. MA 0B4S8, USA e00/C00*4 0989f 8XV1 9N01 iO AXIS ZZ9t 9L% ESS Tl<9T EOOZ.SE'lflf L_„ BKV Archilacrv;rt !nr«r*cr Caugr Ercinaer:n9 Boorman Kroos Vogol Grcoc Inc 2?1 North Sacond Street /mnaosoiis ii-Cl ra-achcne cI2339^7 52 rc«im»le: 612.539 62?2 ww bkvgroup.ca.'n £ce Billing Group 002 Trials: Ik Invoice Invoice Number: 200S4 Invoice Date: August 05, 2002 Citv of Lone Lake P.O. Bo.x 606 Lomi Lake. .VIN 55356 Attention. Michelle Morse Project: 1515.01 City of Long Lake Professional Services throush 7/25/02 Billing Group: Contract 002 Fire Station Fee: Ambulance Service Alternate: TOTAL FEE: S222.600 S 2.500 $225,100 Contract .Amount: Percent Complete: Fee EamcJ: Prior Fee Biilintts: Current Fee Total: Billing Group Total. Billing Group: REIMS Contract E©E0VE^ AUG -S 20K 5225.100.00 92.00% 5207.092.00 5200.339.00 56.753.00 56.753.00 > HilMliil mmm Billing Group REIMB ToCais: BKV Group. Inc. Project: 1515.01 Invoice: 200S-^ Autzust 05, 2002 Page 2 of2 Reimbursables Expense Bond Paper by S.F. Consultant Reunb. Copy Paper 3 1/2 \ 11 Delivery’ Service Express Mail Services Fxx Long Dist Telephone Chrgs Mileage/Travel Photo Finish Postage Reimbursables Totals Charge 5.00 58.SO 86.20 38.90 4.00 2.18 82.49 10.01 14.50 $345.65 Billing Croup Total: Project Totals: S345.65 *** Invoice Total *** 7 S7.098.63 i / David Kroos Biliing Summary Current Prior lyU Professional Services S6.017.77 $190,337.20 S 196.354.9' Reimbursable Expenses:S345.65 $13,623.40 $13,974.05 Outside Services:$735.23 $9,501.80 $10,237.0; Other Serv ices and Fees:SO.OO SO.OO $0.0t Finance Charges:SO.OO SO.OO SO.Ol I Taxes:aO 00 SO.'W som 1 Total:S7.098 65 S213.''6".40 S:21.066.t»rl • kmttUk |i«jrujC.U AJ. GME Consultants, Inc. NWHf7699 P. O. Box 1450 Miime^mfis.MN 554S5 Phone l-80O-79S^S23 Fax 763.5S9.0720 • * • •Auoust22.2t ^ i1 • ••♦ . •*4 *• i *. «*• Statement of Account ! .. City of Long Lake 1964 Paik Avenue P.O.Box 606 Lou Lake. MN 55356 Attention: Accounts Payable Client n>: LONll • J icy ofLong Lake *oiccc bivoka Type Invoice Date Due Dite Invoice. Amount PayiMnci/ Credits Current Balance Ftnance Charie Tout Due }10B Invoice fix eonsiruciion otenfaiioa and testing services for Lnog Uke Fire Staiioo in Long Lake. Minacsoia from April 5 ilirough June 30,2002 Project Engineer Ryan Schmidt C4241 Invoice 07/17/02 08/16/02 S2.720J5 S0.00 S2.720J5 0.00 2.720.33 Project Totils: S2.720.35 SutcmcntTocali: $0.00 $2,720J5 0.00 2.720JS* S2.720.35 SO.OO S2.720J5 0.00 2,720.35 FINAiNCE CHARGES MUST BE PAID IF YOU HAVE CHOSEN TO DELAY TIMELY PAYMENT. THANK YOU. ln\E@EQVE n AUG 2 6 2002nil U tdt -*—*■-i INVOICE 310KiinA¥mMWM.P.O.Bw778.6iylord.imS5334-0776 507.237^4 S07^7.S5ieMX anhiltdur* • tnginttring * tHvironauntal • traiisporlatioH MaRPliaHlIb: 3S39 VMnM C«iMr OrM. St Pul. MN SS110-S1S6 • 651.4902000 • 600325.2065 CITY OF ORONO ATTN MIKEGAFFRON POBOX66 ORONO MN 55323 August 7,2002 Pr<^No: AMGLSU0201.35 Invoice No: 0089951 PRELIMINARY & FINAL PLAT PART CF SW1.4 OF oEC 34.1113. R23. HENNcFIN COUNTY SERVICES TO DATE “PARTIAL INVOICE" Profe —lonel Services: July 1,2002 through July 31,2002 ProfOeeional Personnel Hours Rate Amount LEAD TECHNICIAN 1 1.50 93.00 139..50 SURVEYOR 1 3.00 73.00 219.00 SR WORD PROCESSOR IV 0.50 70.50 35.25 SR V/ORD PROCESSOR 1 0.50 54.00 27.00 Totals 5.50 420.75 Total Labor 420.75 Reimbursable Expense OTHER REIMBURSABLE EXP Total Relmbursables 105.49 105.49 105.49 Outstanding Invoices Number 0085974 0086682 Total 1:Total this invoice $526.24 Date 4/9/02 5/7/02 Balance 1.354.55 401.00 1.755.85 r/t<wv ?./->. ‘7. u/v/Lfulf: Total now due $2,281.79 Stioft EQM Hendrickson Inc.Your Trusted Resource Equel Opportunity Employer Ytmt Uftirv t"* Mirr ^ fnn 2001 EAST 24"* STREET. MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 5S404 MtomMpoit PtWM 612-722-2303 Fax 612-722-2956 DiAjOi Phona 216-727-6463 Fax 216-727-6546 EauCtaira Ptwna 715-636-9335 L L T O SEH 3S3S UODNAIS CENTER DRIVE VAONAIS HEIGHTS MN SSI10 Job n«a«: WILLOWFIRE ADD 6 H I F T O REMIT TO: MINN BLUE DIGITAL IMAGING 2001 E. 24TH ST. MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55404 SI 'VhI M 07/16/02 114431 SEH TERMS: Not 30 days Froight terosi No chargo 310 MAIN AVENUE GAYLORD MN S5334 (612)338-2000 UPS: 0 Ordered by: TOM STEARNS . >'• -(‘•^CUSTOMER P.d •SALESPERSON ORDER DATE AMGLSU0201.3S U. P.S Groun r . A.*‘« l.%lhk«inm'ar^4ina*Msa 16604 Fas 4 16863S KEVIN STRUSZ 07/16/02 ____ - _ ■ 1 1 Copy 421-SVYP PUT NYIPR 21X31 U/IQ 1 ori|iMl, 1 copy 42.16 1 1 Copy 422-SWR PLAT NYLAA 21X31 POT PMT I origiaal, 1 copy 26.65 SHIP UPS 7/16 payment approval P'^ieo •___' ^§40^/4 hU.SU02Q/-5 0LS ------ _GRG ------ GED LMH GAL JCN Opened by: GARY SCHULTZ Clerk: GARY SCHULTZ HAVE YOU SEEN THE NEW PLANWELL v3.5 YET? VISIT WWW.MINNBLUE.COM TO TAKE A TEST DRIVE* Sale amount Freight Tan 88. 61 10. 24 6. 44 FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE WE ACCEPT VISA/MC/AMEX/DISCOVER. Balance due 105.43 Recsiveo By :.Custoaer Copy Date : 1t%ANNUALafTCREST0NPA6T0UeACC0UNTS FMCES SUajECT TO CHAfME WITHOUT NOTICE. Aaraaxiia«xXiwigM,ai«tortiwttgMmuUbaaiaw4M««MlO<lMallwnMMaiMiMiNaaMttwib«waiMtt«ri«i<a^ S|mc«i omw xwiw ar« not rxiumMM SEP 0 9 2002 on rot- UHUNU REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: September 4,2002 ITEM NO: 8 ^ Department Approval: Nme Ron Moorse Title City Adminislntor Adminbtrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Adminisintor's Report Item Description: Miscellaneous^uipment for Long Lake Fire Station Attached is a list of equipment for the Long Lake fire station. The project manager has reviewed and approved the equipment and costs. Although the total cost exceeds the budgeted amount for miscellaneous equipment, this is offset by savings in other areas of equipment. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the purchase of th** attached list of miscellaneous equipment dated August 27, 2002, at a total cost of $18,960, and to authorize this expenditure from the joint fire station account. Long Lake Volimleer Fire Department 1964 Pull Avenue UngUke.MN. 99396 August 27.2 Michelle Morse. Attached are the proposals for the Hoist. Comfxessor. POMor Washer. Washer/Extrador C«cade sydem and fill station. An of these Hems fall under the preject umbrella of Mtooellaneous Equipment I vwdd rsoommend the fcjflowlng be accepted for Installation In the new Long Lake Volunteer Fire Department located at 340 Wilkwr Drive. Hoist (Project Budget within "MIecellaneoue EquIpmenT ■ $18,000) Vendor Sievert Electric Bid Proposal: $2,197 (plus applicable t») Comprseeor (Prelect Budget wHhIn "Mlecellaneoue EquIpmenr <■ $18,000) Vendor Great PWna Company Bid Proposal: $766.60 (plus applicable tax) - this does not indude installation. Instdta Bonto assumed to be handled by the General contractor . Power Washer (Project Budget within "Mlecellarteoue Equipmerrt" ■ $18,000) Vendor Shark BidPfoposal: $2,547.30 (plus applicable tax)-this does not Include installation. Instdlation is assumed to be handled by the General oontrector. Waaher/Extractor (Project Budget wHhIn "MIecellaneous EquIpmenT ■ $18,000)1 Vendor E. Weinberg Supply and Equipment Bid Proposal: $2,878 (plus applicable tax) - this does not include instailation. Insulation b assumed to be handled by the General oontra >.“jor. r • Page2 August 27.2002 Prelect bid reoommendatfons. continued. iCeecede end Air FMieyeteni(Pib|ect Budget wHhin^llllecellaneoueEquipmeiir* $15.000) Vendor Oento BidProponl: $9,319.41 (plus apfificable tax)-this dens Include instailatioa The tclsl of these bids exceeds the Prplecl Budget for MaosOaneous Equipment by $2,707.71 (pka esBm a tsd tax on fois equipmant of a ppreadmalaly $1,2S0 (total axoeaa $3,960). In light of foe favorable variance for preje^ foat ara dosed, (appreximaloly $9711), I uould raquW that these bids be supported. IVe attached a recap of the pro|^ that the Long Lake Volunteer Fire Department team is overs eei ng. Thank you for your support and oonsideration. Binoerely, Slave Persian Fire Chief, Long Lake Volunteer Fbe Department ! 1 » I I < . J il 1 H T r Long Lake Fire Station ] »I r Cowimtnta FwmiMfi 1 56.000 1 •1 65.000 VcioeMaWMng t 20.000 1 15.065 6 4.006 Dfoiecidoead. Nomdreenla Oberalod SeoMiy. Ine. Au4o ViMl Egi#minl 1 10.000 $•1 10.000 t 6.000 t 11.601 6 (•HI)paqjecl doiid. Nomoreeoala Dh»itlfiEecydly.ln6. Pagkig 1 10.000 1 •1 10.000 prcieol doaed. Memereeoala. Muded in Phone EguipmenOMoa OkMled Seeudhf* hM. MMOOTMyHV C^IP^VflWlI 1 16.000 ••6 16.000 pid«l4 IMI hi tfda Ine aie oediMbdoar (noted ME) SaouHiy 1 16.000 1 12.403 1 2.667 pndeddoied. Nomoreeoela OhodM Seemly. Mil SigiMg*1 16«000 1 •6 16.000 Move ABoMVioe 1 $.000 6 •6 6.000 HM (ME)1 •1 2.107 1 (2.107)Mlicolaneoua EqdpmenI SleartEladde CompnaaorCME)1 •6 767 1 (767)Miacolanaoua Eqidgmenl Qred PWhe CemFony Pwef WaMwr(ME)$•i 2.646 1 (2.6a)MIeodMneout Equlpmenl Shork WaMr/EjiMar(ME)1 •1 2,676 1 (2.676)Miecoianeoiia Eqdpnienl E. VFdnbeii Sogpljraid EqtdFfNnl Cii£ide and FI SyMim (ME)1 •1 0.320 1 (0.320)MMooleneoua Eqytpmenl Donho PMteM TnMig Eqidpmeni (ME)s • Aflw»k(M£)1 • TaMiiQn(MS)1 • Ii’oUp^oWm I El 160.0001 IL_»7,»« 1 llflK&IilB 4 I . ;« »«ccT|MQ SEP 0 9 2002 Of f'Y OF OflOvu REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Scptembtr 4,2002 ITEM NO: ^ Department Approval: Naac RooMoone Title City Administrator Adminiitrator Reviewed: Item Description: Long Lake Fire Stanon Site Agreement Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Rqwrt Attached is a Fire Station Site Agreement that addresses a number if issues related to the fire station site that affect both Orono and Long Lake. The agreement sets out the rights and responsibilities of each ofthe cities in relation to these issues. The Council revieu'ed the main points of this agreement several months ago. The agreement is now being brought to the Council for formal approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to ap|»ove the attached Fire Station Site Agreement, and to authorize the City Administrator to sign the agreement. 1 AGREEMENT This is an Agreement between the City of Long Lake, Minnesota (Long Lake) and the City of Orono, Minnesota (Orono), collectively called the Parties (the Parties), on certain matters with respect to the joint development of a fire station situated within the City of Orono. WHEREAS, the Parties have entered into a previous Agreement on August 8,2001 (Settlement Agreement) for the joint construction, ownership and operation of a new fire station; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement of August 8,2001, the Parties have agreed to purchase property in Orono for the new fire station site. The fire station site is a portion of a larger parcel legally described as Lot I, Block I, Willowfire Addition (the "Parcel"); and WHEREAS, certain matters have arisen with respect to the development of this Parcel which the Parties desire to resolve and memorialize as an enforceable Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, Long Lake and Orono, for good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is mutually acknowledged, do agree as follows: 1. The Parties agree that the Parcel will be served by a public road which will provide access to the fire station and to the outlot created to the east of the fire station. The public road is shown on the attached Exhibit A. The construction cost of this road will be funded from the joint fire station account, as created by the Agreement of August 8,2001 . The f.re station account will be reimh* sed for 50% of the construction cost of the road, plus interest at the annual rate of 4%, when the outlot to the east of the fire station is developed. 2. The Minnesota Department of Transportation has agreed to pay the full cost of providing a sewer line to serve the fire station. The sewer will cross the Parcel approximately as shown on Exhibit A. The Parties agree that the sewer line may be built to specifications which provide for greater sewer line depth than the >ewer line for which the Minnesota Department of Transportation has agreed to pay. The Parties estimate the additional expense of the deeper sewer line to be approximately $70,000.00. Orono agrees to pay the additional costs. 3. The Parties agree that permanent utility easements will be provided over Long Lake and Orono utilities as shown on the final plat. HC26DS4. 4707 26554974 vl 2/26^2002 Page I of3 t 4. Lx>ng Lake agrees that it will provide 350 units of sewer capacity to serve other properties in Orono as and when the properties connect to the sewer line. The properties that connect to this sewer line will be treated in the same way as other properties in Orono that have connected to Long Lake sewer lines. Long Lake will charge a connection fee of $3,450 per unit, which includes a Metro SAC charge of $1,200, to connect to the sewer system. This fee is consistent with the 2002 Fee Schedule as adopted by the City Council. The Orono properties that connect to the Long Lake sewer tine will not pay any other one-time or on-going fees. Long Lake will receive a credit from the MCES for the sewer flow from the Orono properties, and Orono will be charged by MCES for this flow. Orono shall be responsible for maintenance of all of the laterals and service taps and Long Lake shall be responsible for the maintenance of the primaiy system. 5. The Minnesota Department of Transportation has agreed to pay the full cost of constructing a water line to serve thi fire station. The water line will cross the Parcel approximately as shown by Exhibit A. The Parties agree that the waterline is available to serve the outlet on the parcel as shown on Exhibit A. Long Lakeill charge a connection fee of $2,700 per unit for residential properties to connect to the water system. This fee is consistent with the 2002 Fee Schedule as adopted by the City Council. Long Lake agrees to provide water service to this lot and charge a quanerly water service fee consistent with the rates established by the City Council for properties outside of the City of Long Lake. Long Lake also agrees that if there is sufficient capacity in the Long Lake water system, and water service is requested, water service will be made available to the properties in Orono on the east side of Willow Drive between Watertown Road and the new Highway 12, to the properties in the Hackberry neighborhood that currently receive sewer service through Long Lake, and to the properties on Woodhaven Drive. These properties would be charged a connection fee and quarterly water service fee consistent with the Fee Schedule as adopted by the Long Lake City Council at the time of the connection. Long Lake shall meter water service with a large capacity main line meter. Orono shall be responsible for maintenance of all of the laterals and service taps and Long Lake shall be responsible for the maintenance of the primary system. 6. The Parties agree that the Parcel has been platted as shown in Exhibit A, and that the outlot will be under the sole ownership and control of the city of Orono. The Parties agree that the fire station sits on approximately 2.04 acres of land as shown by the plat, that the right of way for the public road serving the fire station is approximately .42 acres, and that the wetland mitigation area and storm water ponding area provided for the fire station is approximately .68 acres. The Parties agree that this configuration is consistent with the Agreement of August 8, 2001, in which the Parties determined that the fire station site will be "approximately three acres." HC:6DS4.' 4707/ ’6S54»74 vl t'JO. ’OO’Page 2 of3 L 7. The Parties agree that the joint fire station account created by the Agreement of August 8,2001, will pay for 50% of the costs of platting the Parcel, including engineering costs of the survey and plat. Orono agrees that it will pay the other 50%. 8. The Parties agree that the actual costs of the building permit and pla.*i review fees, and storm sewer trunk fees will be paid to Orono from the joint Are station account. 9. The Parties agree that the City of Long Lake will purchase and carry builder’s risk insurance on the new Fire Station building during the construction of the new Fire Station. The cost of the builder’s risk insurance will be paid from the Joint Fire Station Account. 10. The Parties agree that this Agreement is a bindi.ig obligation, accepted by the resolution of each City coutKil. The Parties agree that this Agreement may be enforced by the injunctive order of a court of competent jurisdiction Approved by the cities of Orono and Long Lake on this day of April, 2002. CITY OF ORONO Ron Moorse, City Administrator CITY OF LONG LAKE Michelle E. Morse, City Administrator Ha«DS4/4707/Zi$$4>T4 vl VttWtt Page 3 of3 iJt limirin AGREEMENT This is an Agreement between the City of Long Lake, Minnesota (L' ng Lake) and the City of Orono, Minnesota (Orono), co>'ectiveIy called the Parties (the Parties), on certain matters with respect to the joint development of a fire station situated within the City of Orono. WHEREAS, the Parties have entered into a previous Agreement on August 8,2001 (Settlement Agreement) for the Joint construction, ownership and operation of a new fire station; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement of August 8,2001, the Parties have agreed to purchase property in Orono for the new fire station site. The fire station site is a portion of a larger parcel legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Willowfire Addition (the "Parcel"); and WHEREAS, certain matters have arisen with respect to the development of this Parcel which the Parties desire to resolve and memorialize as an enforceable Agreen.ent; NOW, THEREFORE, Long Lake and Orono, for good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is mutually acknowledged, go agree as follows: 1 The Parties agree that the Parcel will be ser\'cd by a public road which will provide access tc the fire station and to the outlot created to the east of the fire station. The public road is shown on the attached Exhibit A. The construction cost of this road will be funded from the joint fire station account, as created by the Agreement of August 8,2001 . The fire station account will be reimbursed for 50% of the construction cost of the road, plus intcres* at the annual rate of 4%, when the outlot to the east of the fire station is developed. 2. The Minnesota Department of Transportation has agreed to pay the full cost of providing a sewer line to serve the fire station. The sewer will cross the Parcel approximately as shown on Exhibit A. The Parties agree that the sewer line may be built to specifications which provide for greater sewer line depth than the sewer line for which the Minnesota Department of Transportation has agreed to pay. The Parties estimate the additional expense of the deeper sewer line to be approximately $70,000.00. Orono agrees to pay the additional costs. 3.The Parties agree that permanent utility easements ’.vill be provided over Long Lake and Orono utilities as shown on the final plat. HC260S4^^ 4707/ .,oS54974.vl Page 1 of3 1 4. Long Lake agrees that it will provide 350 units of sewer capacity to serve other properties in Orono as and when the properties connect to the sewer line. The properties that connect to this sewer line will be treated in the same way as other properties in Orono that have connected to Long Lake sewer lines. Long Lake will charge a connection fee of $3,450 per unit, which includes a Metro SAC charge of $1,200, to connect to the sewer system. This fee is consistent with the 2002 Fee Schedule as adopted by the City Council. The Orono properties that connect to the Long Lake sewer line will not pay any other one-time or on-going fees. Long Lake will receive a credit from the MCES for the sewer flow from the Orono properties, and Orono will be charged by MCES for this flow. Orono shall be responsible for maintenance of all of the laterals and service taps and Long Lake shall be responsible for the maintenance of the primary system. 5. The Minnesota Department of Transnortation has agreed to pay the full cost of constructing a water line to serve the fire station. The water line will cross the Parcel approximately as shown by Exhibit A. The Parties agree that the waterline is available to serve the outlot on the parcel as shown on Exhibit A. Long Lake will charge a connection fee of $2,700 per unit for residential properties to connect to the water system. This fee is consistent with the 2002 Fee Schedule as adopted by the City Council. Long Lake agrees to provide water service to this lot and charge a quarterly water service fee consistent with the rates established by the City Council for properties outside of the C dy of Long Lake. Long Lake also agrees that if there is sufllcient capacity in the Long Lake water system, and water service is requested, water seiA'ice will be made available to the properties in Orono on the east side of Willow Drive between Watertown Road and the new Highway 12, to the properties in the Hackberry neighborhood that currently receive sewer service through Long l^e, and to the properties on Woodhaven Drive. These properties would be charged a connection fee and quarterly water service fee consistent with the Fee Schedule as adopted by the Long Lake City Council at the time of the connection. Long Lake shall meter water service with a large capacity main line meter. Orono shall be responsible for maintenance of all of the laterals and service taps and Long Lake shall be responsible for the maintenance of the primary system. 6. The Parties agree that the Parcel has been platted as shown in Exhibit A, and that the outlot will be under the sole ownership and control of the city of Orono. The Parties agree that the fire station sits on approximately 2.04 acres of lar- as shown by the plat, that the right of way for the public road serving the fire station is appre ..lately .42 acres, and that the wetland mitigation area and storm water ponding area provided for the fire station is approximately .68 acres. The Parties agree that this configuration is consistent with the Agreement of August 8. 2001, in which the Parties detennined that the fire station site will be "approximately three acres. HC26DS4 4707/ 26554<}74 vl 2*2^2002 Page 2 of 3 J • « 7. The Parties agree that the joint fire station account created by the Agreement of August 8,2001, will pay for 50% of the costs of platting the Parcel, including engineering cost: of the survey and plat. Orono agrees that it will pay the <ther 50%. 8. The Parties agree that the actual costs of the building permit and plan review fi^, and storm sewer trunk fees will be paid to Orono fiom the joint fire station account. 9. The Parties agrM that the City of Long Lake will purchase and carry builder’s risk insurance on the new Fire Station building during the construction of the new Fire Station. The cost of the builder’s risk insurance will be paid from the Joint Fire Station Account. 10. The Parties agree that this Agreement is a binding obligation, accepted by the resolution of ewh City council. The Parties agree that this Agreement may be enforced by the injunctive order of a court of competent jurisdiction. Approved by the cities of Orono and Long Lake on this day of April, 2002. CITY OF ORONO Ron Moorse, City Administrator CITY OF LONG LAKE Micelle E. Morse, City Administrator HC26D84/ 4707/ 26554974 vt 1260002 Page 3 of3 !»•«%«• • i^rrTlMQ SEP 0 9 2002 CITY OF ORONU REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: September 4,2002 ITEM NO: / 6 Department Approval: Name RonMoofse Titk City Administrator Adminiitrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City AdmininratoTs Report Item Description: Mn/DOT Request for Temporary Permit to Construct In stage one of the Highway 12 upgrade |»oject, a temporary bridge will be constructed over the Highway 12 corridor at Willow Drive. Because the bridge will be offset to the east of the existing bridge, Mn/DOT needs a temporary permit to construct, wMch includes a right-of-entry and permit to perform roadway constniction(similar to a temporary easement) along the western portion of the new fire station property to enable the temporary bridge to be constructed. The City generally obtains temporary easements for its public improvement projects at no cost It is recommended that the necessary temporary permit to construct be approved at no cost to Mn/DOT. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the attached Temporary Permit to Consbuct at no cost to Mn/DOT. . mam mum lnmiiifiiMriijiffiiil(I;.: i TEMPORARY PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT Dated: C.S. 2713 S.P. 2713-75 Parcel 41 Fire Station County of Hennepin The State of Minnesota has by its Commissioner of Transportation established and designated the route of Trunk Highway No. 12 in Hennepin County. Minnesota. It is necessary that the State of Minnesota use for highway purposes real property situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: See Exhibit "A”. The undersigned, having an interest in the above described real property, understand that they are not required to surrender possession of real property without just compensation arnl are not required to surrender lawfully occupied real property without at least 90 days notice. For a valuable consideration, the undersigned hereby waive these rights and give the State of Minnesota an immediate right of entry and permit to perform roadway construction along Willow Drive as shown on Exhibit “A". This Permit will expire when construction is completed. SEP 0 9 2002 CirVOhOflONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: September 9,2002 Item No: // Dqjartment Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name: Title: StephanyGood jt Chief of Police ^ Item Description: Fleet Acquisition Exhibits: DISCUSSION The police department recently acquired a low mileage, 2001 Ford F-ISO pick-up truck through a DWI forfeiture. The vehicle is suitable for use as a Community Service Officer (CSO) vehicle for use in transporting animals, barricades, traffic safety and rescue equipment. The CSO is currently using a 1999 Crown Victoria which is proposed to be removed from the fleet due to high mileage. A pick-up truck is a more suitable vehicle for the duties assigned to the CSO, however the previous truck was sold at the beginning of 2002 due to high mileage and the high cost of repairs. The police department will transfer radio and other emergency equipment from the current sedan and proposes to add a topper to the truck and make other modifications as necessary. The pick up is navy blue, and a new paint job is not required. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to convert a forfeited 2001 Ford F-ISO to the police department fleet as a community service officer vehicle. jy. !ii •i SEP 0 9 2002 CITY Ui- OHOnO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: September 9,2002 Item No: Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name: Title: Stephany Good^^ Chief ofPolic( Item Description: Request To Dispose of 1997 Ford Crown Victoria Squad Car (# 184) Exhibits:None DISCUSS! As a result of routine rotation, squad #184 has been taken out of service and is being replaced with a DWl forfeiture vehicle. Squad #184 has over 112,000 miles and has become cost prohibitive to maintain. This vehicle will be advertised for sale and sold by sealed bid process according to city ordinance. COUNCIL ACTION RROUESTEP Motion to approve the disposal of Squad #184 through sealed bid process. naM . ft Ift SEP 0 9 2002 CllYUrOHONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: September 9,2002 Item No:/3 Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name: Title: Stephany Good Chief of Police Item Description: Metropolitan Airports Commission Assistance Agreement DISCUSSION 1) The Metropolitan Airport Commission has requested mutual aid from all Hennepin County and State law enforcement agencies to provide security at the airport. Full time licensed police officers are trained by the MAC and wear MAC identification badges. Officers are to wear full duty police uniforms and equipment. They will be indemnified and added to MAC’S policy as “additional insureds..’’ 3) MAC will be billed by the City of Orono at the rate of SSS.OO/hour. Officers will be paid at the normal overtime rate. Officem will be paid only for their scheduled shift at the airport. Driving time will not be considered as part of the shift assignment. Orono patrol vehicles will not be used. S) The officers agree that the airport shift assignments will not interfere with their normally scheduled work activity at the Orono Police Department. It is anticipated that there will be about two to six eight hour shifts available per month for Orono officers. The ofhcers agree that if they cannot fill the shift for which they signed up, it is their responsibility to find a substitute. It is not the responsibility of the Orono Police Department to schedule officers for this detail. It is important that the Orono Police Department contribute to Hennepin County Mutual Aid efforts when practical. Cooperation in multi-agency efforts is essential to the success of the Orono Police Department. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve assistance agreement for Orono Police Officers to provide security for the Metropolitan Airports Commission at the Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport. AIRPORT POLICE DEPARTMENT Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport Lindborgh Torminai. Room 370 • Saint Paul. MN 55111 i! f t c a Phone (612) 726-5115 • Fax (612) 725-6185 V 1^ MAC^ t )A;s o \ J t I Ij August 15.2002 Chief Stephany Good Orono Police Department P.O. Box 86 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Dear Chief Good: This letter is to summarize our phone conversation on 08-14-02 regarding law enforcement assistance that the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) is requesting from the Orono Police Department. The MAC will reimburse your agency at the hourly rate of $55 per hour for each officer providing coverage at the screening checkpoints at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. This is the maximum hourly rate that the Federal Government will reimburse the MAC. I am enclosing a "Use of Law Enforcement Personnel Agreement” for you to consider and if it is satisfactory please sign and return it to me. Article II of the agreement deals with fees and charges. You will need to create an attachment A, indicating your fee of $55 per hour. Thank you for your assistance. The coverage you are providing is vital to the operation of the screening checkpoints at the airport. If you have any questions please call me at 612-467-0716. Sincerely. Lynn Hesse Airport Police Department Cc: Lt. Jo Edblom Tliff Airports Qimmisiun is an afrirmative actioii aniployar. M ■J USE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL AGREEMENT This Use of Law Enforcement Personnel Agreement (“Agreement”) is made by and between the Metropolitan Airports Commission (“MAC”), 6040 28'*' Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55450 and_________________________________________ _________^(“Agency”)_________________. WHEREAS, MAC needs assistance in providing licensed law enforcement officers (LEOs) at the passenger screening checkpoints; and WHEREAS, Agency has indicated that it can provide LEOs to assist MAC. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE I SERVICES Agency agrees to provide uniformed LEOs to MAC for airport security duties. The duties are primarily located at or around the passenger security screening checkpoints within (he terminal buildings. The scheduling of the LEOs and the number of LEOs assigned to MAC for airport security duties shall be determined by mutual agreement of the parties. ARTICLE II FEES AND CHARGES MAC shall pay the Agency for the services rendered as agreed upon in Attachment A. MAC shall not be responsible for any additional costs beyond the hourly amount indicated in Attachment A. If a change in fees on Attachment A is required, then Agency shall provide at least thirty (30) days written notice to MAC. ARTICLE III CANCELLATION This Agreement may be cancelled by either party without cause upon ten (10) days written notice. The right to cancel is in addition to all other rights and remedies available to MAC under this Agreement or otherwise by law. ARTICLE rv LIABILITY 1) For the purposes of the Minnesota Municipal Tort Liability Act (Minn Stat. 466), the employees and officers of the Agency are deemed to be employees (as defined in Minn. Stat. 466.01, subdivision 6) of MAC with respect to airport security services pursuant to this Agreement. MAC LEO Agreement June 27.2002 2) Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to waive any rights, privileges, immunities, or tort damage limitations available to either MAC or the Agency under Federal or State law. 3) MAC agrees to defend and indemnify the Agency against any and all claims brought or actions filed against the Agency or the Agency's ofTicers, employees, or volunteers, including but not limited to those for injury to any third person or persons, death of any third person or persons, damage to the property of any third person or persons, or violations of the civil rights of any third person or persons, arising from the performance and provisions of airport security services pursuant to this Agreement. 4) MAC agrees to maintain in effect during the duration of this Agreement and at its expense general liability insurance providing limits of at least $25,000,000 bodily injury, personal injury and property damage combined each occuirence/offense. The insurance policy will include the Agency as an additional insured with respect to the services provided in this Agreement. MAC will provide the Agency with a certificate of insurance naming the Agency as an additional insured and providing at least a ten (10) day notice of cancellation or any significant material change in coverage. ARTICLE V WORKERS’ COMPENSATION Each party shall be responsible for injuries or death of its own personnel. The Agency will maintain workers ’ compensation insurance or self-insurance coverage, covering its own personnel while they are performing airport security activities pursuant to this agreement. Each party or its officers, employees, or volunteers waives the right to sue the other party or its officers, employees, or volunteers, for any workers ’ compensation benefits paid to its own employees or volunteers or their dependent, even if the injuries are caused wholly or partially by the negligence of the other party of its officers, employees, or volunteers. ARTICLE VI DAMAGE TO EQUIPMENT Each party shall be responsible for damage to or loss of its own equipment. Each party and their representatives waives all rights to sue the other party for any damages to or loss of its equipment, even if the damage or loss were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of any other party or its officers, employees, or volunteers. ARTICLE VII EMERGENCIES MAC recognizes that the Agency may have to recall its personnel for emergency purposes. Agency will attempt to notify M.AC at the earliest possible time that the Agency’s LEOs are unavailable for services under this Agreement. ARTICLE VIII LEOs EMPLOYMENT STATUS lAitfaMlllaiiAW MAC LEO Agreement June 27,2002 LEOs provided by the Agency remain employees of the Agency. It is agreed that nothing contained in this Agreement is intended or shall be construed in any manner as creating or establishing an employment relationship between the MAC and the Agency ’s employees. For this Agreement, the Agency's LEOs are expected to follow the policies and procedures of the Agency. The Agency agrees to be responsible for taking any appropriate action for performance related matter against its employees. MAC reserves the right to deny an Agency ’s LEO from providing services under this Agreement. ARTICLE IX SUPERVISION MAC agrees to provide limited supervision to the LEOs. MAC will designate one LEO as the supervisor per shift. The supervisor ’s duties will involve coordination of the daily schedule and periodic monitoring of the LEO’s activities. The supervisor will notify appropriate MAC staff regarding any performance issues. MAC will pass along the information to Agency for the Agency ’s follow-up. ARTICLE X NOTICE All notices required by law or this Agreement must be in writing and delivered in person or sent by mail to the following parties (or to any other address or person that one party provides to the other party in writing as the ofticial notification): MAC:Jo Edblom Lieutenant, Airport Police Department 4300 Glumack Drive, Suite 370 St. Paul, MN 55111 Telephone: (612) 726-5115 AGENCY: XXXXXXXXXXXX ARTICLE XI AUDIT Agency shall keep at their principal ofnee, in a system acceptable to MAC, accurate books, accounts, records and documents relevant to the work conducted under this Agreement, and shall keep such information for a period of six calendar years. MAC and the legislative auditor shall have the right at all reasonable times during the business hours of Agency to inspect the books, accounts, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices relative to the work c nducted under this Agreement. MAC LEO Agreement June 27.2002 ARTICLE XII MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT This Agreement and all data created by this Agreement are subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, regardless of who possesses the information. u ARTICLE XIII ENTIRE AGREEMENT The parties agree that this document and Attachment A are the Entire Agreement between the parties. No promises, representations or oral agreements have been made between the parties that arc not part of this Agreement; and no claim or liability shall arise from any representations or promises not expressly stated in this Agreement except as expressly stated in this Agreement. ARTICLE XIV MODIFICATION This Agreement may be modified only by a written agreement signed by both parties. The parties a^ee, intend to be bound and execute this Agreement on the day and year as indicated. Date:METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION 11. I By: a Title:♦ Date:AGENCY Title; 1 SEP 0 9 2002 CUYOhORONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 3ATE: September 5,2002 ITEM NO; / V Dcpartneol Approval: Nmc LinVce Tide City Clerk Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Resolution Amending the Program for Deferment of Special Assessments for Persons 65 Years of Age or Older Attachments: 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Hennepin County Memo Regarding 2002 Section 8 Income Limits The City has established a program for deferment of special assessments for persons 65 years of age or older. The income guidelines for deferment have been revised to conform with the 2002 Section 8 Income Limits. The Application for Deferral of Special Assessments is also being revised to reflect the updated income guidelines. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the attached resolution amending the program for deferment of special assessments for persons 65 years of i^e or older by revising the income guidelines, and to approve the update of the income guidelines on the deferral application. i » A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE PROGRAM FOR DEFERMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PERSONS 65 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono is the official governing body of the City of Orono; and WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute Section 435.193 through Section 425.1 95 authorizes the City of Orono, upon proper application, to defer the payment of special assessments against any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older on January 1 of the payment year and for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments; and WHEREAS, Section 425.194 authorizes the municipality to establish an interest rate to be added to the deferred assessment which shall be payable in addition to the deferred assessment; and that Orono had adopted such a program under Ordinance 2.62 (1984 recodified). Resolution 1093 (dated November 13,1979), Resolution 1779 (dated June 10,1985), Resolution 2864 (dated August 27,1990), Resolution No. 3894 (dated April 28,1997), Resolution No. 4288 (dated May 10,1999), Resolution No. 4667 (dated May 8,2000) and Resolution No. 4716 (dated October 22,2001). WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the deferral of assessments should be granted to any person otherwise qualified who makes proper application to the City of Orono on forms prescribed by the County Assessor of Hennepin County and by the Orono City Council and for whom the City Council determines that it would be a hardship to make the payments, based upon the following criteria: NUMBER OF PERSONS MAXIMUM INCOME IN HOUSEHOLD 1 Person S38.IOO 2 Person $43,500 3 Person $48,950 4 Person $54,400 5 Person $58,750 6 Person $63,100 7 Person $67,450 8 Person $71,800 Page 1 of2 N Assets, not including homesteaded property, must be $50,000 or less. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BV THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORONO IN A REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED, that the assessments against any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older and for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments, be deferred for a period of time not to exceed five years subject to the afor^ntioned financial criteria, upon submission of an appropriate application signed by the qualified persoii, and w^ich may upon expiration of initial or any subsequent renewal deferments 1^ reapplied for, and subject to the applicant meeting all the necessary criteria upon replication be deferred for an additional period not to exceed 5 years; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the right of deferment is automatically terminated under Section 435.195 if: 1. 2. 3. 4. The owner dies and the spouse is not otherwise eligible; The property or any part thereof is sold, transferred or subdivided; The property should lose its homestead status; or If for any reason the City determines that there would be no hardship to require immediate or partial payment. Adoptetii x'y the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held September 9,2002. ATTEST:Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Page 2 of2 li SEP-05-2002 12:34 HENN CTi* TRRNS & REPL EST 612 348 9710 P.02/02 Hennepin Hennepin County DATE: TO: ntOM: SUBJECT: Frinuaiy 14,2002 Urban Hennepin County Subredpients Office of Planning and Development, Development Planning Unit 2002 SECTION 8 INCOME UMITS Below ate the Section 8 income limits, effective 1/31A)2 low-income (80 percent of median) and very low-income (SO percent of median) housdiolds. Income for housdiolds at 60percentand30peioentof median income is also provided. All income limits are based on 1990 census data updated to 2002. The US median family income, \iMdi increased to $54,400, is used as a cap in calculating income for a four-person household at 80 percent of median. Median income in the Minneapolis/St Paul MSA increased from $74,700 to $76,700. These income limits must be used in calculating household income eligibility for all HUD-funded activities that need to document low/moderate-income benefit. These income limits are efiective until further notice. FY 2002 MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME: $76,700 (MPLS/ST. PAUL METRO AREA) - * ■ 4 1 Person 38,100 32,220 26,850 16,100 2 Person 43,500 36.840 30.700 18,400 3 Person 48.950 41,400 34300 20,700 ftPersrm 54,400 46,020 38350 5 Person 58,750 49.680 41,400 24,850 6 Person 63,100 53.400 44,500 26,700 7 Person 67.450 57.060 47350 28350 8 Person 71,800 60.720 50,600 30,350 FY 2002 Fadtral Poverty Guidelines: One person - $8,860, Two persons - $11,940. Three person - $15,020, Four person - $18,100, Five person • $21,180, Six person - $24,260, Seven person • $27340, Eight person • $30,420. .O:\OPUPROCVCoaplMVSceti0B I toegoM Lumu ‘02.4 m HeNNtnN COUNIYOfMICC OP PlANNINO ft DevetjOPMSNr. OCVSLOPWNT PLANNme UNIT 10709 WAvsATA B oulcvaho . Sun 260. minnstonka . MN S8306 MAiuCoee 60a Phone ; (962) eat •7080-Pak (952) 541-709O-TCO/Trr (982) 941.7961 TOTAL P.02 SEP 0 9 2002 C»fY OfOHONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: September 6,2002 15'ITEM NO: Departmeot Approval: Nine RonMoone Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:^enda Section: City AdministratOf*s Report Item Description: Wiilow Drive Property weil i^(recmcnt The probity purchased for the fire station on Willow Drive is encumbered by an agreement related to the joint use of a well located on the adjacent property to the north. The well agreement for the City, as the property owner, to pay the cost of maintaining and operating the well. Because the pressure tank and electrical service were located in the house that was demolished, it is necessary to replace these to enable the proper operation of the well. Mr. Miller has suggested that rather than the City replacing these, and continuing to pay for the maintenance and operation of the well, the City can buy out its obligations under the well agreement at a cost of $5,075.00. This is the cost of providing and installing a pressure tanir^ a small shed to house the pressure tank, and a generator to provide electricity for the well. While the City may be able to provide for the continued operation of the well at a somewhat lower cost, or may be able to make a case for the termination of the well agreement based on the fact that the demolition of the house on the City’s property voids the well agreement, the potential indirect costs to the City of either of these alternatives could make the overall City costs very similar to the buy-out amount. Therefore, it is recommended that the City accept the buy-out proposal. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the buy-out of the well agreement with Ed Miller in the amount of $5,075.00, and to amend the General Fund budget to reflect the expenditure. L —u- % ^ ' SEP 0 9 2002 CllYU^OHO^IO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: September 9,2002 ITEM NO.: DquirtmeBt Approval: Naait Ofcgoiy A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Admiiibtrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Admlnistrator's ’s Report Item Description: Solicitation of Quotations for North arm Lane Paving- Resolution After the Public Hearing for this project, the Council approved a resolution ordering the preparation of plans and specifications for this project. The next step in this project is to solicitation competitive quotations for this project Because the project cost is less than $50,000, quotations can be obtained fio this project. Once quotations are received an assessment hearing will be held. We are recommending approval of the attached resolution ordering the solicitation of quotations. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution ^proving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Solicitations of Quotations for the North Arm Lane Paving Project H ? ! h ! i RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING SOLICITATION OF QUOTATIONS WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the Council on August 26,2002 the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the North arm Lane Paving improvement project NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications are hereby lyiproved. 2. The City Engineer shall solicit competitive quotations for completion of the North Arm Lane Paving Improvement project. Quotations shall be accepted until 2:00 p.m. on September 23, 2002. An assessment hearing will then be held and after the assessment hearing the quotations will be considered by the Council at 7:00 p.m. on October 14,2002 in the Council Chambers. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 9th day of September, 2002. ATTEST: Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Linda S. Vee, City Clerk ItlAi 'c »!TINQ Proclamation naming September 11 as ALWAYS REMEMBER 9-11 DASfp q 9 WHEREAS, in an unprovoked and senseless act of terrorism, four civillStTUlflMfloivo were hijacked on September 11,2001. and crashed in New York City. Pennsylvania and the Pentagon; and WHEREAS, innocent U S. citizens of all heritages as well as visiting citizens of foreign nations were killed and injured as a result of these horrific acts; and WHEREAS, whiie we as a Union still continue to recover from the unspeakable loss of so many innocent lives, the indomitable spirit of the United States has been revitalized and given way to numerous expressions of heroism and patriotism; and WHEREAS, the threat of terrorism, destmction and senseless violence must be banished for any free society to exist; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono shares in the grief and will commemorate the one- year anniversary of the September 11 tragedies; NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of Orono. that we extend our deepest condolences to the innocent victims of these unprovoked actions by terrorists, as well as to their families and their friends; and be it further RESOLVED, that we salute the heroism of public safety and rescue workers, volunteers, local officials, and those who responded to these tragic events with courage, selfless compassion, determination, and skill; and be it further RESOLVED, that we dedicate September 11. 2002. ALWAYS REMEMBER 9-11 DAY. a day to mourn, reflect and rededicate ourselves to ending terrorism in commemoration of the anniversary of the terrorist attacks; and be it further RESOLVED, that we encourage all our citizens to honor the victims of September 11 by reaffirming their commitment to sustaining our newfound patriotism through volunteerism. community involvement, and service; and be it further RESOLVED, that we as citizens dedicate our time, talents, and energy to lift one another up and foster a new level of understanding and awareness. Let us honor the memory of all those who died by being of service to one another and by building the "stronger, more perfect union" our founding fathers called for. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Date i SEP 0 9 2002 CITY OF OflONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: September 6,2002 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Nanc Lin Vee THfe City Clerk Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Licenses Item Description: List of Licenses forvouncil Approval SPECIAL EVENT I.Applicant:Brenshell Homes/Tara Stokes Event:Fall 2002 Parade of Homes Location:2200 Shadywood Road Date:September 7-29,2002 Time:Noon - 6:00 p.m., Thursdays through Sundays 2.Applicant:Steiner & Koppelman/Timothy O’Connor Event:Fail 2002 Parade of Homes Location:372 Westlake Street Date:September 7-29,2002 Time:Noon - 6:00 p.m., Thursdays through Sundays 3.Applicant:Tony Eiden Company/Tony Eiden Event:Fall 2002 Parade of Homes Location:52S Sussex Circle Date:September 7-29,2002 Time:Noon - 6:00 p.m., Thursdays through Sundays COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve/deny the above listed licenses. CITY OF ORONO SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT Date Issued: Date of Event: Time: September 10,2002 September 7 - 29,2002 Noon - 6:00 p.m. Thursdays through Sundays Name of Penon(s) And/or Organization Sponsoring this Event: Tara Stokes Brenshell Homes P.O. Box 125 Mound. MN SS364 Phone: Location of Event: Type of Event: 952-495-9001 2200 Shadywood Road 2002 Parade of Homes The following documents are required and on file at the City Administrative Offices: Certificate of General Liability Insurance Approval from Orono Police Department Approval from Orono Building and Zoning Department Notification of Special Event Provided to Adjacent Property Owners Written Permission from Hennepin County for Use of North Arm Landing for Shuttle Service The following conditions have been placed on this event: • This special event permit is subject to immediate revocation by the Orono Police Department upon violation of any City Ordinances or identification of hazards to safety of the public. • No on-street or on-site parking allowed. County Road 19 is posted with “No Parking” signs. Shuttle service must be provided. • Signage indicating shuttle serv ice should be placed at the driveway of the event and at North Arm Landing, in a location that will not obstruct the views of traffic. • Shuttle service is to be provided during all hours of the event. • Shuttle turnaround must be made in the driveway rather than hacking onto County • No event traffic or people are allowed to cross onto adjacent properties to the event home. • Permit holder is responsible for removing all related signs at the end of the event. Approved at City Council meeting on: September 9,2002 (City Seal) Ronald J. Moorse, City Administrator 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone: 952-249-4600 / Fax: 952-249-4616/www.ci.orono.mn.us CITY OF ORONO SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT Date Issued: September 10,2002 Dale of Event: September 7 • 29,2002 Time: Noon - 6:00 p.m. Thursdays through Sundays Name of Penon(s) And/or Organization Sponsoring this Event: Timothy O’Connor Steiner & Koppelman 18340 Minnetonka Boulevard Wayzata, MN 55391 9ft Phone: Location of Event: Type of Event: 952-473-5435 372 Westlake Street 2002 Parade of Homes The following documents are required and on Tile at the City Administrative Offices: Certificate of General Liability Insurance Approval from Orono Police Department Approval from Orono Building and Zoning Department Notification of Special Event to Neighboring Property Owners Written Permission from Property Owner for Event Parking on Adjacent Property The following conditions have been placed on this event: • This special event permit is subject to immediate revocation by the Orono Police Department upon violation of any City Ordinances or identification of hazards to safety of the public. • Parking will be on the adjacent property with written permission from the property owner. An alternate parking plan is to use the Bederwood Park parking lot and provide shuttle service to the home. • Westlake Street is to be posted “No Parking” by permit holder. • Bayside Road from County Road 135 to 3700 Bayside Road is to be posted “No Parking” by permit holder. • Vehicle turnaround is to occur at the site of the event rather than on neighboring properties. • Permit holder is responsible for removing all related signs at the end of the event. Approved at City Council meeting on: September 9,2002 (City Seal) Ronald J. Moorse, City Administrator 2750 Kelley Parkway. P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone: 952-249-4600 / Fax: 952-2494616/www.ci.orono.mn.ua CITY OF ORONO SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT Date Issued: Date of Event: Time: September 10,2002 September 7 - 29,2002 Noon - 6:00 p.m. Thursdays through Sundays Name of Person(s) And/or Organization Sponsoring this Event: Tony Eiden Tony Eiden Company 4100 Berkshire Lane Plymouth, MN 55446 Phone:763-559-0251 ition of Event: 525 Sussex Circle Type of Event: 2002 Parade of Homes The following documents are required and on file at the City Administrative Offices: * Certificate of General Liability Insurance • Approval from Orono Police Department • Approval from Orono Building and Zoning Department * Approval of Fox Bend Homeowners Association The following conditions have been placed on thb event: • This special event permit is subject to immediate revocation by the Orono Police Department upon violation of any City Ordinances or identification of hazards to safety of the public. • Parking is to be limited to one side of the street. • Permit holder must post the road with signs, and must remove them at the conclusion of the event. Approved at City Council meeting on: September 9,2002 (City Seal) Ronald J. Moorse, City Administrator 2750 Kelky Parkwiy, P.O. Box <6. Crystal Bqr, MN 55323 Phone: 952-249-4600/Fax: 952-249^ 16 /%irww.ci.oroiK>Jnn.us CITY OF ORONO SEP 0 9 2002 *Check Detail Registei© 0«06«2 8:S7AM P«9«1 ClIYOhUHONO SEPTEMBER 2002 10100 Primary Cash ^aid 6hki 074239 0/9/2002 4LL STAR ELECTRIC E 101-43000^08 Contracted Street Maint. E 101-43000408 Contracted Street Main! E 101-43000-408 Contracted Street Maint. Total ALL STAR ELECTRIC $79.86 5321 $99 66 5340 $7161 7161 Replace Bul>-12 A Willow ReplaceBuJb-12A6 Replace BuK>-12 A OCB $251.13 Paid Chki 074240 0/0/2002 ANDERSON. KRISTI E 101-45200310 Other Profiettional Services E 101-41300-319 Other Professional Services E101-42400-319 Other Professional Services Total ANDERSON. KRISTI $160 00 8/2002 $105 00 8/2002 $250.00 8/2002 Park Com 0/3 Council Mtg 8/26 Planning Com 8/19 $605.00 Paid ChUP 074241 0/0/2002 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SERVICES E 101-41000-201 Omce supplies $55.90 6013-270670 E 101-41900-201 Office supplies Total ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SERVICES $54.50 6013-270681 Coffee Coffee $110.40 Paid Chki 074242 0/0/2002 AT A T WIRELESS SERVICES E 601-40400-321 Telephone $16.95 3419397 E 602-40450-321 Telephone $18.95 3419397 E 101-41000-321 Telephone $25 88 3419397 Total AT AT WIRELESS SERVICES $6378 Cell Phones Cell Phones Cell Phones ^aid diiki 074243 9/8/2002 AUOIE8 MOBILE CHEF E 61349900093 Conc*Mk>ns For Reaale-Tid>l E 61349900093 ConcoMlona For RoMlo-Txbl ToUl AUOIE8 MOBILE CHEF $5382 1254 ($3.20) 1323 Hot Doga, Hamburgers Billing Correction $5062 Paid Chki 074244 9/9/2002 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY E 60249450-227 Utility System Maint. SufipNas $126.18 92551307 E 60249450-227 Utility System Maint. SuppUes Total BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY $26 89 92551308 LSill Fuses LSF11 Fuses $155 07 Paid Chki 074245 9/9/2002 BORIS, SCOTF E 10142110-226 Clothing S personal equiprrtent Total BORIS, SCOTT $69 85 8/26A)2 Uniform Equipment $69 85 Paid Chki 074246 9/9/2002 BUDGET PRINTtNO E1C142110-201 Offico supplies E 10141410-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories Total BUDGET PRINTING $41 54 22413 $97 67 22602 Busmess Cards Voter Receipts $139 21 Paid ChkP 074247 9/9/2002 BUFFALO BITUMINOUS INC. E 10143000-224 Street Maint. Materiala/Supply $150 92 12186 Patch Mlix Total BUFFALO BITUMINOUS INC.$150 92 Paid Chk# 074246 9/9/2002 CARGILL SALT E 60149400-215 Chemicals and Cham Products Total CARGILL SALT $2,188.95 531983 Solar Salt $2.188 95 Paid Chki 074249 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO E 101-42110-402 Repeirt/Meint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repain/Maint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repaira/Maint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repatn/Maint-Auto Equip $382 00 22362 $30.57 22368 $41.50 22379 $28.00 22417 Bearings - Sqd 187 Oil Chg J91 Tire Repair, Throtle #189 Ign Connection #191 1 CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Registei® 09mA)2 8:57 AM Page 2 SEPTEMBEfl 2002 Check Amt kivolce Comment E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maim-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repairi/Maint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repain/Maint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repairt/Maint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repaire/Maint-Auto Equip E101-42110-402 Repairt/Maint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repain/Maint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repain/Maint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repain/Maint-Auto Equip E 231 -45650-402 Repain/Maint-Auto Equip $35.00 $193 00 $96 23 $22 22 $30.49 $164.08 $204.95 $13201 $35 00 $8924 $56.00 $32.57 $56 00 22420 22455 22458 22460 22462 22467 22475 22476 22507 22526 22527 22529 22531 Elec Diagoitict 8185 Coa. DiagnotUctaiSa Oil. OiffomO #184 Spotlight #191 OiJChg #185 Battery #189 Head Light Attbly #187 OH. Fuel \ni Serv #189 Spot Light #191 Oil Chg, Cooling Fish #190 Check Sqd 184 Oii Chg #195 Total CHUNKS LAKESHOf^ AUTO $1.640 66 PaMChM 074251 8/0/2002 CITV Of MOUND E10M2260-318 Fira SaiviCM $27,474.75 1095 4th Qtr 2002 Fire Services ToUl CITY Of MOUND $27,474.75 ^aid Chk# 0742^2 9/9/2002 CITY OF WAYZATA E 101-42260-318 firaSarvioea $7,561.25 8/29/02 3rd Wtr 2002 Fire Service Total CITY OF WAYZATA ~ $7,561 25 l^aid ChMP 074253 9/8/2002 CY8 UNIFORMS E 101.42110-226 Clothing 8 personal equipment $19.11 14787 Cuffhoider Total CYS UNIFORMS $19.11 Paid ChkF 074254 9/9/2002 OAHLGREN SHARDLOW S UBAN E 101-43280-304 Englneering-Contuttlng $3,058 53 23367 Oahlstrom - 02-2769 ToUl OAHLGREN SHARDLOW SUSAN $3,058.53 Paid Chki 0)^255 9/9/2002 DAHLKE TREE SERVICE E 101-43000-408 Contracted Street Maint $4.562 50 800 Tree Tnmming/Removal E 101-43000-408 Contracted Street Maint.$440 00 8«Bannen - Navarre ToUl DAHLKE TREE SERVICE $5,002.50 Paid ChK# 074256 9/9/2002 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. E 613-49900-093 ConcoMlons For Reule-Txbl $39.10 188559 Concessions for Resale E 613-499004)91 Beer For Resale $5850 188559 Beer for Resale ToUl DAY DISTRIBUTING CO.$97.60 G 101-21719 DCA/Spendir>g Accounts Total OCA-WIREONLY $41160 9/5A)2 Spending Accounts 9/5 $41160 Paid Chk# 074258 9/9/2002 DEPT OF AOM - INTERTECH GROUP --------- E 101-42110-311 Data Processing Communication $37,00 DV020711763 PVC July 2002 ToUl DEPT OF AOM-INTERTECH GROUP $37.00 Paid Chk# 074259 9/9/2002 DEPUTY REGISTRAR E 101-42110-441 Licenses 8 Taxes Total DEPUTY REGISTRAR $12 50 F150 Ucm\%9 • Ford F150 $1250 Paid Chk# 074260 9/9/2002 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE E 613-49900-091 Beer For Resale Total EAST SIDE BEVERAGE $125 90 285785 $125.90 Beer for Resale h CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Registei<g) 0M6A)2 8:57AM Pages SEPTEMBER 2002 Check Ami Invoice E 602-494S<M06 Repairs/Mainl-S««r UnM/Mto Total ELECTRIC PUMP $15.999 30 21250 $15,999.30 Annual LS Inspection Paid Chki 074262 9/9/2002 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC E 101 -42400-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $10925 12696 StrotwiZIt Total EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC $109 25 Paid CltkP 074263 9/9/2002 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS E 101-42400-439 Mealing Expansaa $1661 33642 Copies Total ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS $1661 Paid Chk» 074264 9/9Q002 FORESTRY SUPPUERS, INC E 101-42110-206 BookaSPariodicalB $25 50 4727484K)Wild Lifio Removal Handbk Total FORESTRY SUPPLIERS. INC $2550 Palddhk* 07426S 9/9/2002 GSKSERVICES E 101-41900-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldga/Orounds $5066 299219 Mat Service E 101-41900-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds $50 66 299221 Mat Service E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $49 63 306144 Shop Toerels E101-43000-226 Clothing A personal equipment $116.13 306144 Uniforms E 613-49830-226 Clothing A personal equipment $25.88 306145 Uniform - Steffenhagen E 601-49400-226 Clothing A personal equipment $14.43 306146 Uniform • Rathbun E 101-43000-226 Clothing A personal equipment $8867 313169 Uniforms E 613-49830-226 Clothing A personal equipment $7 68 313170 Uniform - Steffenhagen E 601-49400-226 Clothing A personal equipment $14.43 313171 Unifonn • Rathbun Tout OAK SERVICES $41837 Paid Chk* 074266 9/9/2002 OAU'S INC. E 101-42110-402 Repaira/Maint-Auto Equip $44 97 55890977 Spotlight Handle Total GALL'S INC.$55 97 Paid Chk« 074267 9/917002 QANTZ. INEZ R 613-37910 Green Fees $160 00 9/4A12 Season Pass Refund Total GANTZ.INE2 $160 00 Paid Chk« 074268 9/9/2002 OAPPA.GREG E lOI-'IOOO-: lage $13 65 6/27/02 Postage E 101-i2400-33k Travel Expenses $84 52 6/27/02 Mileage Reim E 101-45200-439 Meeting Expenses $12.42 6/27/02 Pop - Park Tour Total GAPPA.GREG $110 59 Paid Chki 074269 9/9/2002 GENUINE PARTS CO. E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts S Accessories $17.39 887961 Shop Supplies ToUl GENUINE PARTS CO.$1739 Paid Chki 074270 9/9/2002 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE E 101-43000-224 Street Maint Materials/Supply $13.31 27232 Propane Total HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE $1331 E10M1600-309 Jail Charges Total HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-AC^ S527 00 662 $527 00 Room aruJ Board 7/2002 Paid Chk# 074272 0/0/2002 HERC-U-UFT E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $5 06 01P7136420 Adapter CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 09m/02 6;57AM Pagt4 SEPTEMBER 2002 Check Amt Imrolc# Comment Totat HERC4I-UFT $5.06 Paid Chki 074273 0^9/2002 HUEB8CH RENTAL SERVICE E 61349630404 Repairs/Maint BidgsfGrounds $2507 675405 Mat Service • GC ToUl NUEBSCH RENTAL SERVICE $25.07 Paid Chki 0742>4 9/9/2002 WDRO SUPPLY CO. E 60149400-227 Utility System Maint Supplies Total HYDRO SUPPLY CO. $774.60 21612 Meter for Resale $774.60 PaldOliki 074275 9/9/2002 lOENTAORim E 10142110-201 Office supplies Total IDENTADRUO $^00^S3344 $30.00 tdent-A-Orug Access Paid Chki 074276 9/M002 KENNETH N. POTTS. PA E 23145650-307 Legaf-ConsuRing $960.44 5/30A)2 E 23145650-307 Legal-ConsuNing $147.00 500/02 E 23145650-307 Legal-Consulting $210.00 500/02 Total KENNETH N. POTTS. PA $1,337.44 2002 Avalanche Forfit 1962 Cadillac Form 1992 Jeep Form Paid ChM 074277 91912002 KUSTOM SI0HAL8 INC E 101-42110403 Repalrs4Maint44isc. Equip ToUl KUSTOM SIGNALS INC $36 08 134058 $38.08 Computer Cable Paid ChMl 674278 9/9/266^ LEAGUE OF MN CITIES E 651-49910-227 Utllily Syate^ Maint Supptlaa $5,000.00 1-00001594 NPOES Phase II Guide Plan Total LEAGUE OF MN CITIES $5,000.00 Paid ChM 074279 9/9/2002 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT E 10143000-221 Equipment Parts 6 Accessories $44.24 36131 Chain E 10143000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $42.63 36396 Stihl Saw Chain E 10143000-226 Clothing A personal equipment $22 34 38505 Screen for Helmet Total LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT $109.41 PaidtbhMP 0>4ia0 91912002 MARTIN, JIM A BETSY E 101-45200490 Contritoutiona to Civic Org'a $165.00 6/22A)2 Balloons • Dog Days ToUl MARTIN. allM A BETSY $165.00 Paid Chki 074281 9/9/2002 MIDWEST ASPHALT E 10143000-224 Straat Main! Matarials/Supply $132.06 70340MB Hand Patch Totel MIDWEST ASPHALT $132.06 Paid^Chki 074262 900002 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTUNO CO E 61349900-092 Soft Drinks For Resale _ 61351260 Water for Resale Total MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTUNO CO $140.00 Paid Chki 074283 9/9/2002 MIDWEST FUELS E 10143000-212 Motor Fuels 6 Lubricants G 101-14101 Gasoline Inventory Total MIDWEST FUELS $562 57 $2,60521 ».367.76 2560 2560 609 Gals Diesel 2047 6 Gals Unleaded Paid Chki 074264 9/9/2002 MINNEAPOUS OXYGEN COMPANY E 10143000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $31.69 RI06020696 Acetylene. Oxygen Totel MiNNEAPOUS OXVOEN COMPANY $31.69 Paid Chlor074265 9/9/2002 MT1DIST CO. E 10145200-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $29 35 315860 Cart Repair Kit CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 0MWA2 8S7AM Pages SEPTEMBER 2002 E 613-40630-240 Small Tools and Minor Equip Total MTIOtSTCO. Chock Amt ImojMjCominonl $201.29 316977-01 BaRWashon $23064 Paid ChM 074266 W9/2002 N.F.PA E 101-42400-433 Memborahips A Subscriptions Total N.F.PA $115 00 2047212X NFPA Membership - Oman $11500 Paid Chki 074267 9/9/2002 NATIONAL BUSBKSS JNSTITUTE E101-42400-437 Training & DevelopmenI $24900 Oaflron Total NATIONAL BUSINESS INSTITUTE Land Use Law Update 'S74900 >ald(ihkf 074288 0^0002 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS ---------------------- E101-42110-321 Telephone $666.65 506573311 Police Cel Phones Total NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS $666.65 E 101-42110-201Office supplies $8537 161244967 Office Supplies E 101-41900-201Office supplies $104.33 161244967 Office Supplies E 101-41900-201Office supplies $728.78 178987571 Office Supplies E 101-42110-201Office supplies $596.28 178967571 Office Supplies E 101-41900-201Office supplies ($597.97) 179597420 Office Suppkes E 101-42110-201Office supplies ($489.25) 179597420 Office Supplies E 101-41900-201Office supplies $33 39 179597796 Office Supplies E101-42110-201Office supplies $27.32 179597798 Office Supplies Total OFFICE DEPOT $488.25 Paid Chk» 074290 9/9/2002 PIONEER 0101-19999 Suspense Account $27.50 279 AdvforBMt-NAnnLn E 101-42400-340General Advertising $87.00 285 LandUsaAppllc E 101-42400-340General Advertising $45.77 288 Land Usa Applic E 101-41900-352Printing APutOshiog $23.88 296 Candidate FiMng E 225-45215-530 Other Improvements $61.69 309 Adv for Bids E 101-42400-340General Advertising $29.05 327 Land Usa Applic Total PIONEER $275.69 Paid Chki 074291 9/9/2002 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC. E 602-49450^06Repairs/Maint-Swr Hnei/lifte $1,959.57 11226 Controliar LS i5 E 602-49450-406Repaira/Maint-Swr Hnoa/Mte $33677 11284 Fusas/Labor LS 11 Total QUAUTY FLOW SYSTEMS INC.$2.298 34 E 101-43000-221 Equipment Paris A Accessories Total ROO FINANCIAL SERVICES $1367 124832 C-hook,Link $1387 Paid Chki 074293 9/9/2002 RELIANT ENERGY E 101-41900-361 Gss A Electric E 101-41900-381 Gas A Electric E 602-49450-381 Gas A Electric E 601-49400-381 Gas A Electric E 101-42110-381 Gas A Electric Total RELIANT ENERGY $42.05 $6041 $11.74 $553.71 $34.42 060006750600 Oas Service 060006750600 Oas Service 060006750600 Oas Sorvioo 060006750600 Oas Servica 060006750600 Gas Servica $702.33 ^aid Chki 074294 9/9/2002 RELIANT ENERGY - GC E 613-49630-381 Gas A Electric Total RELIANT ENERGY >GC $15.98 539004161700 Oas Servica $15.96 Paid Chki 074295 9/90002 RETTINOER OIL CO. t;' CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 09m/02 8:S7AM Pages E101-43000489 Other MisoeVaneoua Chargee Total RETTINGERBROSOILCO SEPTEMBER 2002 Check Amt $25.50 54587 $25.50 Paid Chki 074296 9/9/2002 SCHARBER 4 SONS E 61349830-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories Total SCHARBER S SONS $10.63 2028594 $10.63 OHFWer Paid Chk« 074297 9/9/2002 SEARS E10143000-240 SmaH Tools and Minor Equip ($170.39) 3090593 Return Drill E 10143000-221 Equ^ent Parts & Accessories $21.29 3090594 Socket. Wrench E 10143000-240 Small Tools and Minor Equip $189.55 4090425 Pliers. Drill Total SEARS $40.45 Paid Chk« 074298 9/9/2002 SEN E 101-43290-304 Engineering-Consulting $112.00 90195 Swr/Wtr Trunk-LUOrono Fire Total SEH $112.00 Paid Chkf 074299 9/9/2002 SIGNS OF THE SEASON E 101-45200-223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies $40.47 738 Sign • Saga HiO E 10145200-223 Bktg/Grounds Maint. Supplies $53.25 756 Signs • Dogs, Boats Total SIGNS OF THE SEASON $93.72 Paid Chki 074300 9/9/2002 STAR TRIBUNE -------------------------------------------- E 10141900-352 Printing 8 Publishing $317.40 12757006 Adv (or Emp - Big Insp ToUl STAR TRIBUNE $317.40 Paid Chk* 074301 9/9/2002 STATE TREASURER ~ ------- E 101-42400-437 Training & Development $35.00 Oman 2002 FaD Bldg Code Seminar E 101-42400-437 Training A Development $35 00 Oman 2002 Fan Bktg Code Seminar Total STATE TREASURER $70.00 Paid Chk# 074302 9/9/2002 STREICHERS “ -----------^ E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $60.15 303020.1 Headlight Flasher E 101-42110-226 Clothing & personal equipment ($255 49) 303791.1 Credit - hotsteie E 101-42110-226 Clothing A personal equipment $66.00 307198.1 Uniform Supplies E 101-42110-226 Clothing A personal equipment $186.11 310536.1 .40 Cal Magazines E 101-42110-226 Clothing A personal equipment $31.90 310538.1 C*jff Holder ToUl STREICHERS $108.67 Paid Chk« 074303 9/9/2002 SUMMIT SUPPLY CORP OF COLORADO E 10145200-223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies $407.00 30408 Table Frames Total SUMMIT SUPPLY CORP OF COLORADO $407.00 Paid Chk# 074304 9/9/2002 THE HOME DEPOT E 10145200-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $73 17 8/9/02 Lumber - Picnic Tables ToUl THE HOME DEPOT $73.17 Paid Chk# 074305 9«/2002 THE SION AGE E 101-45200-101 Full-Time Employees Regular $165.00 11227 Advertising - Dog Days ToUl THE SIGN AGE $165.00 E 613499004)91 Beer For Resale E 61349900-091 Beer For Resale Total THORPE BIST CO. $53.00 271796 $42.15 272537 Beer for Resale Beer for Resale $95.15 Paid Chki 074307 9/9/2002 TKOA CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 08mn28;S7MI Pagt7 SEPTEMBEfia002 E60M940(M89 Ottwr lifottanMiM Chargaa Total TKOA OtackAml InvoiM Commont 8273.73 seiss Uak Localion-2500 Shdywd 8273.73 074308 E 101*43 W90002 TOaOASftWEUNNOSUm^ ■221 EquipnwmP«ta8A00MM(iM 834.80 197549 Tolol TOLL GAS EWEUNNO SUPPLY Acolyltno 834.80 Paid CMoi 074309 9W2002 TOMCHECK. LARRY E101-42110^437 Training 8 Davaiopmani Total TOMCHECK, LARRY 859.30 8127/02 Moab/Mlaga - Training 859.36 Paid Chki 074310 9W2002 TWIN CITY OARAGE DOOR CO. E101-42110-404 Ropakt/Mainl-Bldga/Grounda 8103.52 150300 Braakar • PD Door Total TWIN CITY OARAGE DOOR CO.8103.52 Paid CMdl 074311 9/9/2002 UMTEO RENTALS E 601-40400-415 Oliwr Equipmant Rantala E 601-49400-415 Ottwr Equipmant Rantais E 602-40450-415 Ottwr Equipmanl Rantaia Total UNITED RENTALS 8232.70 835.14 835.15 471694 478835 478635 Traffic Ctrl - 2620 Shadywood Banieadaa Banlcadaa 8302.99 Paid ChW 074312^ 9W2002 VERIZON WIRELESS E 601-49400-321 Taiaphona E002-4U50-321 Talapirana E101-41900-321 Talaphona Total VERIZON WIRELESS 814.19 814.19 8322.08 1003-4585141 1003-4585141 1003-5022058 UOMy Cal Phono UtNty Cal Phono ColPhonaa 8350.48 Paid ChW 074313 Offi/2002 VILLAGE CHEVROLET E101-43000-221 Equipmanl Paita & Acoaaaoriaa Total VILLAGE CHEVROLET 86402 362714 Parte 6428 884.02 Paid ChM 074314 0/9/2002 VOOt HEATMO S AIR E101-41000-404 Rapaira/Malnl-Bldga/Orounda 8242.00 3337 Total VOGT HEATMGS AIR Water Laak • Council AC 8242.00 PaidChk* 074315 9/9/2002 WRIGHT HENNEPM ELECTMC E101-43000-381 OaaAEIactric 826.64 E 602-49450-381 Gaa& Electric 821.07 Total WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 3113000200 3113009200 Electrical Sarvica Electrical Sarvloa 847.71 10100 Primary Caah 865.906.86 m l I (lllTli ,r- 1 .■ titliai ilBiiiirrli inn I CITY OF ORONO clMck rtgistor 0»05n28:46AM Pagsl Chock Pay Numbar Employaa Nama ParM Chack Amount Chack Data Chack tMua 051717 051657 051656 051659 051660 051661 051662 051663 051652 ARNESON. JOSHUA A. 051653 DODGE. RACHEL M. 051654 JOHNSON. MARY ANN 051655 LESKINEN. DENISE M. 051656 VOID MOORSE. RONALD J. VEE. UNOAS. KUEHN. THOMAS M. OLSON. RONALD J. PETTIT. SANDRA K. AM>ERSON. BRUCE L BOBZIEN. SUE A. BORIS. SCOTT W. 051664 CARLSON. MICHAEL B. 051665 CORNICK. JAMES L 051666 DEMBOUSKI. JAYC. 051667 ERICKSON. KURT R 051666 FARNIOK.CORREYL 051669 FISCHENICH.OANT. 051670 FISCHER. CHRISTOPHER 1C 051671 GOOD. STEPHANY R. 051672 HENDRICKS. RONALD J. 051673 JOHNSON. JEFFREY LARSON. NELL E. MADSON. ADRIENNE ML MCNICHOLS. DAVID L MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES PERSEU. WiaiAM R. SCHOENHOFF. JOHN B. TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F. TOMCZYK.MARKW. WITTKE. ANTHONY A 051663 ARNESON. JOSHUA A 051664 HERMAN. JOHN R. LEE. JOSEPH P. BOLTERMAN. MATTHEW A BOTTENBERG. WENDY C. GAFFRON. MICHAEL P. 051669 GAPPAGREGORYA 051690 KANGAS. JAMES K. MEYER. WILLIAM C. OMAN. LYLE E. WEINBERGER. PAUL E. BRINKHAUS. JOHN F. DEBAERE. DONALD L GREGORY. JAMES D. HANSEN. STEVEN OBERAIGNER. SCOTT G. OBRIEN. RANDY L PALMER. GREGORY A RATHBUN. BARRY J SKREEN. DALE 8 051674 051675 051676 051677 051676 051679 051660 051661 051662 051665 051666 051667 051666 051691 051692 051693 051694 051695 051696 051697 051696 051699 051700 051701 051702 17.1 $1,011.76 9/4A» OuWamflng 16 $991.69 9/4/02 Outstanding 16 $665.62 9/4/02 Outstanding 18 $791.74 9/4/02 Outstanding 18 $0.00 0/4A)2Vold 16 $7.80 9/4A)2 Outstanding 16 $1,194.99 9/4A)2 Outstanding 16 $990.31 9/4A)2 Outstanding 16 $102.07 9/4A)2 Outstanding 16 $439.38 9/4A)2 Outstanding 16 $1,126.81 9/4/02 Outatantang 18 $727.79 9/4/02 Outstandtag 18 $1,649.64 9/4A2 Outstandtag 16 $716.74 0MA» Outstandtag 16 $1,919.31 9/4A)2 Outstanding 16 $1,669.75 9/4/02 Outstanding 18 $1.467 96 9/4A)2 Outstanding 18 $1,531.24 9/4A)2 Outstandtag 18 $1,431.39 9/4/02 Outstandtag 16 $416.37 9/4/02 Outstanding 16 $1,639.60 9/4/02 Outstanding 18 $1,337,02 9/4A)2 Outatanding 16 $1,281 78 9/4A)2 Outatanding 18 $695.83 9/4A)2 Outatanding 18 $804.25 9/4/02 Outstanding 18 $619.10 9/4A)2 Outatanding 18 $1,553.19 9/4Ai2 Outatsndhig 18 $297.22 9/4/02 Outatandtag 18 $1,446.39 9/4A» Outatandtag 18 $41630 9/4/02 Outstanding 18 $1,407.71 9/4/02 Outstanding 18 $1.299 66 9/4A» Outatandtag 18 $556.14 9/4A» Outatanding 18 $695.85 9/4/02 Outstanding 16 $326.06 9/4/02 Outstanding 18 $1,016.13 9/4A» Outstandtag 16 $1,122.64 9/4/02 OuMsndtag 16 $1,351.13 914m Outstanding 18 $1,760,33 9MA)2 Outstanding 18 $1,152.14 9/4A>2 Outstanding 16 $631.12 9/4/02 Outstanding 16 $153.96 9/4/02 Outatanding 16 $1.443 58 9/4A)2 Outstanding 16 $1,319.70 9/4A)2 Outatandtag 16 $1.053 47 9/4/02 Outatanding 18 $1,053.79 9/4/02 Outatanding 18 $1,033.16 9/4/02 Outatanding 18 $848 37 9/48)2 Outatanding 18 $952.31 9/4/02 Outatanding 18 $765.06 9/48)2 Outatanding 16 $1,303.94 9/4/02 Outatandtag 16 $1,060.58 9/48)2 Qutatandtag CITY OF ORONO check raglttor 0«0SC28;46AM Pa9«2 ClMCk Numtor CmptoyM Itaim ISSBBKn Pay Pailod Chack Amount Chack Data Chock StaluB 0S1703 ABRAHAMSON.FREDW. 0S1704 OOiOSMITH.FAULT. 0S1705 HAMBRO.MAftSHAUJ. 051706 JENSEN, ROONEY W. 051707 MARSELLA.DANO. 051706 MaNTVRE, WILLIAM E. 051700 OA8, DANIEL O. 051710 PEICKERT.OARYJ. 051711 ROSS. JOHN A. 051712 SMYTH, KATHERINE R. 051713 STEFFENHAOEN, RONALD 051714 STORK, JOHN T. $116.44 S61.48 $54.63 1200.57 $330.02 $217.07 $166.46 $350.63 $115.61 $111.66 $1,340.62 $221.61 $54,801.53 B/4A12 Outstanding 0/4A» OuMandIna 0MA)2 OuMamflng 0MA» OuManding 0/4C2Oiitatanding 9/4A>2 Outstanding 0/4A» Outstanding W4A)2 Outstanding W4/02 Outstandkig 0MA» Outstanding OM/02 Outstanding 9/4/02 Outstanding 1 ____________ _________________ ___________________- ■ L. CITY OF ORONO chtck raglsl»r 0B«S«28:47AM P«g«1 Ciwck Numbtr EmployM Nanw .-?aea JiVJLJki: Chock Amoufil Chock 051716 PETER80M. BARBARA 051719 MCX)RSE. RONALD J. 051720 8ANSEVERE, ROBERT K. 051721 MURPHY. JAMES L 051722 NYGARO.JAY 051723 WHITE. JAMES M. $323.22 $346.31 $269.36 $269.36 $269.36 $269.36 8/9/02 OuMandbig 0/9/02 OuMwidino 0/9/02 OuManding 0/0/02 OuMandbig 0/0/02 Outstanding 9W02 Outstanding $1,740.97 k ,r>ir d . . .TWin-M rfSl tOlatdik CITYOFORONO *Check Detail Register® 0W0«02 7:39 AM Pagel SEPTEMBER 3002 C hade Amt Invoica Commant 10100 Primary Caah PaMChMI 074227 0/4A>2 CITV COUNTY CREDIT UNION G101-21711 Cradtt Union $10,499.00 ToMI CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION $10,495.00 G 101-21709 Othar Ratlremant Total ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-4S7 $300.00 $300.00 PaWChki 074230 9HrtS LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE G 101-21707 Union Dues $0.00 ToUl LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE ' ' $0.00 PfldCMtf 074231 9/4A)2 MN CHILD SUPPORT PMT CTR G101-21712 Other Oadudiona $242.27 Total MN CHILD SUPPORT PMT CTR $242.27 PaMChk* 074232 VW2 MN DEPT OP REVENUE G 101-21702 Stele Withholding $4,200.16 Total MN DEPT OF REVENUE K200.16 PaMChM 074233 9M/02 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST G 101-21705 Other ReUrement $2,589.66 Total ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST $2,569.68 $219.93 Paid Chki 074234 mm PEBSCO/OBRA G 101-21705 Other Retirement Total PEBSCO/OBRA $219.53 Paid Chk# 074235 9/4A)2 PEBSCOAJS CONF OF MAYORS G 101-21705 Other Retirement $2,342.00 Totel PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS $2,342.00 Paid Chki 074238 9/4/02 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT G 101-21704 PERA $6,745.46 G 101-21704 PERA $5,228.22 Total PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT $11,973.68 Paid Chki 074237 9/4A)2 UNITED WAY G101-21708 United Way $90.00 Total UNITED WAY $50.00 Paid Chki 074238 9/4/02 WISCONSIN SCTF 0101-21712 Other Deductiona Total WISCONSIN SCTF $184.62 $184.62 10100 Primary Caah $92,037.39 SAVINGS W/H A TRANSFERRED Paid Chki 074228 9/4/0^ FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES 0101-21701 Federal Withholding $10,334.17 FEDERAL W/H G101-21703 FICA Tax Withholding $4,953.14 FICA S MEDICARE W/H G101-21703 FICA Tax Vl/Khholding $4,953.14 FICA & MEDCR CITY SHARE Total FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES $19,440.45 DEFERRED COMP UNION DUES MOROWeZYNSKI 00014456477 STATE TAX W/H MN STATE RETIREMENT OBRA DEFERRED COMP USCM-ENTITY 2339 PERA CITY SHARE PERA EMPLOYEE W/H CHARITY DONATIONS JOHNSON i 0002756898 .] SEP 0 9 2002 utturunufto information H \ ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING SEP 0 9 2002 UIIVUI-OHONO . f I Ron Moow-CC meting P»ge11 From: To: Date: Subject: "Kandis M Hanson” <KandisHansonOcityofimound.oom> "Ron Moorsa" <rmooriaOci.orono.mn.us> 9/6A)2 2:22PM CC meeting GladarSaptS, 2002 SEP 0 9 2002 CIIYU^UHONO Dear Ron, The Mound City Coundl would like to invite the members of the Orono City Council to a Joint meeting to discuss Orono's ongoing invoNement in the current Mound Fire District, and other reiated topics of discussion. They have targeted 6:30, Gets. Would you please check with your members and confirm if they can attend. You are also invited. The meeting will be in a workshop setting in the City of Mound Council Chambers. ThanksI Kandis Hanson City Manager City of Mound