The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03-11-2002 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, MARCH 11,2002,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet. ROLL CALL CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approve/Amend r>.o/, % / APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 2. Regular Counc;! Meeting of Februaiy 25.2002 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Pat Wolfe. Representative PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Jeanne Mabusth, Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 3. #01-2735 Zoning Code Amendment - Lot Coverage by Structures - Ordinance 4. #02-2748 Richard Mar/an. 2795 Pheasant Road - Variances - Resolution * 5. #02-2753 Wesley B>Tne, 2817 Casco Point Road - Variances - Resolution 6. #02-2755 Long Lake Fire Station - City ofOrono. 340 Willow Drive North - Class 111 Subdivision, Variance and Conditional Use Permit - Resolutions MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR'S REPORT CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 7. Pay Request - Long Lake Fire Station 8. Additional Water Patrol Deputies on Lake Minnetonka 9. Bid Award - 2002 Insurance Package - Resolution 10. 2001 Investment Report (Information Only) 11. Police Department Donation \\A* / ^ 11rv s ^ • W. f cii h)c CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT A/I/, ^ . 12. LICENSES Special Events * 13. BILLS AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, MARCH 11,2002,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 2m 03/1 1 -Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 03/18 - Planning Commission, 6:30 p.m. 03/25 -Council Work Session, 5:30 p.m. 03/25 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 04/01 -Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p.m. 04/08 - Council Work Session, 5:30 p.m. 04/08 -Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 04/15 - Planning Commission, 6:30 p.m. 04/22 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 04/24 - Board of Review, Wednesday, 7:00 p.m • f « Public Attendance Meeting Date /A KC ouncil □^Planning C ommission □ Park C ommission □ Other Please hll out the information requested BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME (please print) ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER 4.. 5. 6.. 7.. 8. 9. 10.. 11.. 12.. ii 13.. 14. 15.. Xi\0Ma\A4iM8rali«e SnppwlVlFanM • OM)\fORMS\Pt’BUCATT ] ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25,2002 ROLL ““ ’ ' » Cl I V ur UHONu The Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Barbara Peterson, Council Members Jay Nygard, Richard Flint, and Bob Sansevere. Representing staff were City Administrator Ron Moorsc, Planning Director Mike GaBron, City Attorney Tom Barrett, Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, Public Services Director Greg Gappa, and Recorder Alissa WIntemheimer. Council Member Jim While was absent. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approve/Amend Items 14, 15, 16, 18, 19,20,21.23, and 25 were added to the Consent Agenda. Item 8 was removed from the Consent Agenda. Sansevere moved, and Flint seconded, to approve the consent agenda as amended. \'ote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES *2. Regular Council Meeting of February 11,2002 Sansevere moved, and Flint seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of February II, 2002. V’ote: .Ayes 4, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS—PAULINE BOUCHARD, REPRESENTATIVE Bouchard mentioned the Park Commission’s support of the Mound skate park and noted that a resolution of support was on the agenda. She stated they had heard of some boards to surround a hockey rink that might be available cheap, and wondered if there was a place available to store them in the off-season should they be able to obtain the boards. Gappa stated the boards were in Fargo, so it would be difficult to get them back to Orono. Bouchard stated that the Star Tribune had run an editorial regarding Miruietonka Beach not allowing the public access to the Dakota Rail Corridor. She suggested that if ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25,2002 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS—PAVUNE BOUCHARD, REPRESENTA TIVE —Continued Minnetonka Beach had hired a lobbyist, then maybe Orono should as well. The Park Commission planned to draft a letter to the editor to show that Orono does not support Minnetonka Beach’s position. Sansevcrc stated he agreed with the letter. Flint stated he favored hiring a lobbyist to keep them informed of legislation that might affect the Dakota Rail. Sansevere stated he does not approve of hiring a lobbyist. Gabriel Jabbour stated that the cities of Orono, Spring Park, Mound, Minnestrista, and St. Bonifacius, as well as Hennepin, Carver, and McCloud counties all support the trail unanimously as an uninterrupted corridor. He stated that Representative Tom Workman gave him his word that he would not introduce legislation against the trail. A bill was posted on Friday and passed on Tuesday, with Minnetonka Beach the only group that testified. It was a lobbyist driven bill, and Orono ’s interests will not be served unless they have a representative on the floor. He also stated that the DNR, Hennepin County, and Met Council are on their side, and he suggested sending a letter to Met Council. Mr. Jabbour stated that Minnetonka Beach's comprehensive plan states in several places that the corridor should not revert to a transportation corridor, but should become a park available only to Minnetonka Beach residents. Flint stated that a lobbyist could cost up to $5,000 to keep the Council advised. He su'jgested making the money available to spend at the Mayor ’s discretion, but to not use it unles necessary. Flint moved, and Nygard seconded, to make up to $5,000 available for a lobbyist, to be used at the Mayor^s discretion. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 1 (Sansevere). PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS—SANDY SMITH, REPRESENTATIVE None. LMCD REPORT—LILI MCMILLAN, REPRESENTATIVE McMillan spoke about the additional water patrol project over the 2001 boating season. There were no boating fatalities on Lake Minnetonka, a reduction of personal injury accidents by more than 50%, an increase in public contact, but lower citation count. The number of patrol hours by deputies was increased by 59% to 2,546 hours. She felt the program was a big success. 1 1 ----UJUtslkuUMI ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25,2002 LMCD REPORT—LIU MCMILLAN, REPRESENTATIVE—C0nHnued McMillan stated that they were able to transfer out deputies, keeping the cost of the program down—only S52.000, versus the $100,000 originally budgeted. They plan to use the overpayment from 2001 to fund the 2002 program. They would also require some additional funds from the cities. Orono’s expense for 2002 would run about $600, because they are budgeting $60,000 for the 2002 program. She stated Minnetonka did not contribute last year, because of a disagreement over the payment formula. They will approach them again for this year, and they would like to have all fourteen cities with l^eshore involved. She stated they really appreciate the cities’ and communities’ support of the program. The DNR conducted a sur\ ey and found that people felt the quality of enforcement was good, constructive and helpful. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 3. #01'2699 Jay and Kendall Nygard, 1386 Rest Point Road—Varia^,«.»s- Resolution No. 4757 Weinberger stated that the Nygard’s had requested a variance to permit a two story addition for an entry way and second floor living space. The addition would be 8 ’ from the east property line encroaching 2' into the 10 ’ required side yard setback. The variance would allow the addition to match the existing exterior wall on the house. When finished, the hardcover shall equal the current hardcover. The Nygard’s would place the addition over existing hardcover and remove part of existing rock garden to not have mere than the existing hardcover on the property. They would also remove all landscaping fabric and install a proper drainage system. Sansevere moved, and Flint seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4757 granting variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(L)(2) to permit an alteration to existing hardcover over 25Vo for a two-stor>‘ residential addition and variances to Section 10.24, Subdivision 5(B) to permit an addition 8’ from the side property’ line where a 10’ setback is required. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0 (Nygard abstained). rVrtM 1 i - ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25,2002 *4. #01-2706 Richard Stark, 815 Partcnwood Road—Variance Review—Resolution No. 4758 Sansevere moved, and Flint seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4758 granting variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 to allow the remodeling and expansion of the existing residence to include a four stall garage, construction of a screen porch 38* from the 929.4 OHWL mark by adding 57 s.f. to a lakeside deck, and adding 140 s.f. to a lakeside deck located 33* from the 929.4 OHWL where 75* is required; a hardcover variance of 4,233 s.f. (15.0%) where 5,815 s.f. (20%) is exbting and none is allowed. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *5. 01-2709 Richard and Anne Shull, 2285 French Creek Road—Variance— Resolution No. 4759 Sansevere moved, and Flint seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4759 granting a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(CK1) to permit structure within 150* of a Natural Environment Lake, Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(LK1) to permit 3,830.25 s.f. (23.5%) of hardcover in the 0 - 75* setback area, and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(C)(6) to permit the encroachment of 50* and 75* into the average lakeshore setback for construction of a three stall garage to the east end of the residence, a new entryway over existing steps and a cantilevered bay window. Vote: Ayes 4, N^ys 0. *6. #01-2730 Ace Properties, 3375 Crystal Bay Road—Variances—Resolution No. 4760 Sansevere moved, and Flint seconded, to adept Resolution No. 4760 granting variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6(B) to permit construction of a new residence on a property with a lot size of 6,690 s.f. (.15 acre) where 21,780 s.f. (1/2 acre) is required, a lot width of 50* where 100* is required, to permit a 19* rear setback where 30* is required and a 9.7* side setback where a 10* setback is required; Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(L) 1 and 2 to permit 748 s.f. (23.8%) hardcover in the 0 - 75* setback where no hardcover is allowed and 2.062 s.f. (53.4%) hardcover in the 75 - 250* setback where 934 s.f. (25%) is allowed. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 7. #02-2746 Mark Finney, 3210 North Shore Drive—Variances Mark Finney was present. Weinberger stated that the property in question functions as a back lot. The Planning Conunission recommended approval of the plan with the condition that the addition be J ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25,2002 7. §02-2746 Mark Finney, 3210 North Shore Drive—Variances—Continued shifted to be n;<sh with the existing house tine. They also recommended a proposed garage be reduced in size. Mr. Finney agreed to that and reduced the size in order to only require a 10 ’ setback. The final survey work on the revised plans was not yet in. In order to shift the addition and preserve yard space on the other side of the house, they made the addition longer and narrower, so that overall, it is the same size as the addition the Planning Commission reviewed. In addition to that, there is a proposed ground level deck and enclosed screen porch to be constructed on the front side of the house. They wish to increase the screen porch so that it can be accessed directly from the house. Hardcover would be reduced substantially, but would still be over the 25% allowed hardcover. Even with the addition shifted to match the current house line, there is a variance required for the side setback because the addition would sit 8’ from the side yard setback. The final sur\ey work is needed to locate a sewer line to make sure the proposed garage not be located over the sewer line. If it is not, then a utility easement would be required over the area of the sewer line. Most of the conditions made by the Planning Commission have already been met by the applicant’s revised plans. Weinberger stated the staff would be comfortable recommending approval subject to the final survey work and locating the sewer lines. Mr. Finney stated he would do whatever it takes to meet the City ’s requirements. Sansevere and Nygard stated they supported staffs recommendation. Moorse clarified that the screened porch would be fine as long as it stays under thel5% structural coverage maximum. Flint moved, and Mayor Peterson seconded, to approve the application subject to the final survey being completed, the sewer being located, and subject to the final resolution being drafted. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 8. #02-2747 Tonka Ventures, 3749 Livingston Avenue—Easement Vacation— Resolution No. 4761 John Gleason with Hillcrest Northwest Townhomes was present. He stated he was the builder, not the developer, with the project. Flint stated he removed it from the consent agenda because of the neighbor ’s concern over tree removal and replacement, and erosion that was depositing material on adjacent lots. Mr. Gleason stated that they need to follow an approved building plan, and until the last ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25,2002 S. #02-2747 Tonka Ventures, 3749 Livingston Avenue—Easement Vacation- Resolution No. 4761—Continued building is finished, it will be difficult to control erosion. They are currently controlling erosion with a silt fence and hay bails. They have also planted trees as planned up to this point, but will need to complete the project before they can finish the plantings and landscaping. How soon they can finish the project will depend on the weather. The approved landscape plan is filed with the City and the City has a line of credit that will be held until the project is complete. Weinberger stated that the neighbors may have thought more trees would be going in than actually will. The final elevations wouldn't be complete until the project is complete and the backfill is in. Flint asked if the City Engineer would visit the site. Kellogg stated he would visit on Friday. Weinberger stated that if the Council did not adopt the resolution, then it would have to come back at the March 11"* meeting. Flint stated he would be willing to approve it based on the builder ’s \ erbal assurance that he would address the neighbors* concerns. Mr. Gleason stated he was looking for approval so that they could begin construction. Flint moved, and Sansevere seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4761 vacating a dedicated drainage and utility easement within the plat of Lake Minnetonka Woods. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 9. #02*2749 Thomas P. Egan, 350,360,370 Big Island—Vacation Weinberger suggested the Council might want to discuss the role of the Planning Commission in relation to vacating land on Big Island. He stated that the applicant had phoned to say he would not be present because his neighbors were unable to attend, and he could not speak for them. Flint stated they should get the Parks Commission ’s input as a matter of policy on vacating public lands. He suggested the City may want to preserve part of the right-of- way as public access to the lake. Nygard stated that the area was comprised of bluffs and it was not a good access point. Flint moved, and Nygard seconded, to table item 9. Vote Ayes 4, Nays 0. Flint moved, and Nygard seconded, that vacation requests within the City should first be reviewed by the Parks Commission. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25,2002 *10. #02-2750 Edward and Michelle Winer, 2010 Shoreline Drive—Variance- Resolution No. 4762 Sansevere moved, and Flint seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4762 granting variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1(B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(CK6) to allow encroachment of 10’ into the average lakeshore setback to permit an addition and deck to existing residence. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *11. #01-2751 Mark Welsh, 3625 North Shore Drive—Variances—Resolution No. 4763 Sansevere moved, and Flint seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4763 granting variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2, Section 10.55, Subdivbion 8 and Section 10.56, Subdivisions 16(L) 1 and 2 to permit 615 s.f. (16.4%) hardcover in the 0 - 75 ’ lakeshore setback where 660 s.f. (17.6%) hardcover exists and no hardcover is allowed, and to permit 884 s.f. (51.6%) hardcover in the 75 - 250 ’ setback svhere 932 s.f. (54.4%) hardcover exists and 428 s.f. (25%) hardcover is allowed; Section 10.25, Subdivision 6(B) to permit new construction on the lot with a delined lot area of 5,462 s.f. where 21,780 s.f. is required and a lot width of 50 ’ where 100’ is required, and to permit a side yard setback of 5 ’ for the bouse where a 10’ setback is required; and Section 10.61, Subdivision 5(A) to permit one off-street parking space to be located 3 ’ from the adjacent property line where off-street parking in ’’R” districts is required to be set back 10’. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *12. #02-2754 Matthew and Kathy Dolliff, 2680 Pheasant Road—^Variance— Resolution No. 4764 Sansevere moved, and Flint seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4764 granting variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(b)(2) to permit 6,355 s.f. (34.19%) hardcover in the 75 - 250 ’ lakeshore setback where 6,355 s.f. (34.19%) hardcover exists and 4,646.75 s.f. (25%) is allowed to permit an addition and walk to the existing residence. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 13. #02-2755 Long Lake Fire Station—Cit>' of Orono, 340 Willow Drive North— Class 111 Subdivision, Variance and Conditional Use Permit Gaffron stated that the lot available to the fire station is about 6 acres, and the fire station was supposed to have about 3 acres available to it. The City was proposing a 2-lot plat, creating a lot for the fire station, a rear lot for potential residential use, and a road outlot at the south end that would continue to be ow'ned by the City for future use. Due to site ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25,2002 13. #02-2755 Long Lake Fire Station—City of Orono, 340 fViiioiv Drive North— Ctass III Subdivision, Variance and Conditional Use Permit—Continued factors, the road right-of-way has been widened to 60’. There are wetlands on the property. Part of the area will be filled for the fire station. They will be meeting with the watershed district to approve the stormwater plans. The fire station itself comprises about 50% hardcover for the fire station. They would create a holding pond on lot 2 to mitigate for the wetland that is being filled on lot 1. The Planning Commission approved the preliminary plat as presented, subject to MCWD approval of the wetland mitigation and stormwater management plan. GafTron stated that widening the road to 60’ has resulted in the need for a 10 ’ setback variance to locate the fire station building 40* from the proposed road outlot, rather than the 50* required. The Planning Commission approved the setback variance, finding that the variance is supported by the hardships, and will have no impact on the neighborhood or adjacent properties, with the condition that if the 6“* bay is not built, the station must meet the required 50 ’ setback. The fire station building incorporated a hose tower that would be used for training purposes. The tower exceeds the 30’ allowed height by almost 5 ’. The Planning Commission denied the CUP for tower height because it would have a potential negative visual impact on the neighborhood, its use could become a nuisance in the residential neighborhood, the need for the excess height had not been demonstrated, and the potential impacts of the tower in the residential neighborhood could not be satisfactorily mitigated. Gaffron presented other issues for discussion. Staff recommended that park fees be waived for Lot 1 and deferred for Lot 2 until it is residentially developed. Council would have to decide whether Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fees would be due for the plat. He suggested Council document allowable fire station uses. Staff recommended that Council consider platting Lot 2 as an outlot since it was uncertain how the lot would ultimately be used. He stated it would be most appropriate to dedicate the road corridor as a public road, and then name it. No application fees had been paid. Staff recommended that as a minimum, all out-of-pocket and consultant costs be charged. Moorse stated that he had received an email from the fire chief requesting that they approve the tower. Flint, Sansevere, and Mayor Peterson all stated that they were not convinced the extra 5 ’ of height was necessary. Sansevere stated he was comfortable with all of the staff s recommendations. Moorse stated they could approve the tower up to 30’ in height. Mayor Peterson asked about the ambulance portion of the fire station being the last add- altemate. Jabbour stated that the committee agreed they would build the ambulance portion, and that portion would not be subject to the cost-cap, and would definitely be 8 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25,2002 i3. U02-2755 Long Lake Fire Station—City of Orono, 340 Witiow Drive North — Class III Subdivision, Variance and Conditional Use Permit—Continued added. Sansevere asked why the fire department seemed to be fighting the ambulance addition. Moorse stated that the only issue now was financial because the ambulance personnel would not have access to the fire station. They would have a separate entrance and all their needs met in a separate portion of the building. Nygard stated he had an issue with granting a variance on new construction. Flint stated that the variance was not required because of the b"* bay, but because of the wetland. He also stated that if they were to deny the 6"* bay, it should be through a direct approach, and not by means of denying the variance. Jabbour stated they had tried to push the building north, but there is a row of large, mature trees on the north edge of the property. Also, a temporary bridge for the highway construction will cut through the north comer of the property. With the wetlands to the east of the property, they cannot relocate the building on the property. Nygard moved, and Sansevere seconded, to approve the plat as presented. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Sansevere moved, and Flint seconded, to approve the 10’ setback variance. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 1 (Nygard). Sansevere moved, and Flint seconded, to deny approval of the conditional use permit per Code Section 10.75, Subdivision 1 to allow a hose tower of 34.8*. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Flint moved, and Sansevere seconded, to waive lot fees for Lot 1, and defer fees for Lot 2. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Flint r.ioved, and Nygard seconded, to charge Stormwater and Drainage Trunk fees to Lot 1, and defer them for Lot 2. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Flint moved, and Nygard seconded, to require lighting and signage to meet City codes and be low key. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Flint moved, and Sansevere seconded, to approve that Lot 2 should be platted as an outlot. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. L ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25,2002 13. U02-2755 Long Lake Fire Station—City of Orono, 340 Willow Drive North- Class 111 Subdivision, Variance and Conditional Use Permit—Continued SaDsevere moved, and Mayor Peterson seconded, to dedicate the road corridor as a public road. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Sansevere moved, and Flint seconded, to require that application fees be charged. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Nygard stated that he felt there should be some sort of cubic foot ordinance for lot size to prevent the construction of large, boxy houses on small lots. He staled it was an issue for the Planning Commission to discuss. Mayor Peterson asked about the piles of dirt at 18S0 Brown Road. Weinberger stated that they had graded beyond what they were supposed to, and ordered to have it corrected by March S"*. They arc to remove the dirt and decompact the wetland soils. Mayor Peterson asked if everyone was aware of the Hollander property and the crows. Moorse stated that Hollander had been putting out large containers of cat food and it is creating a nuisance with the birds. Barrett stated they want to be careful not to make it illegal to feed birds. He felt the judge who is hearing the Hollander hazardous building case may be willing to direct him to stop putting out the food. Sansevere stated he was in favor of naming the road by the fire station after Gabriel Jabbour. Flint stated they don’t name roads after living persons as policy. Mayor Peterson suggesting asking stafT for recommendations. PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR’S REPORT *14. Accept Donation of Storage Sbed Sansevere moved, and Flint seconded, to accept tbe donation of a sbed to tbe City of Orono from Rick’s Super Value Store. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. ' rt# M\ I t\ ^iin I ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25,2002 *15. Bid Award—2002 Materials and Equipment Sansevere moved, and Hint seconded, to approve the year 2002 Materials and Equipment Bids. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *16. Request for Final Payment—Navarre Park Project Sansevere moved, and Flint seconded, to approve Request for Final Payment, Navarre Park Improvement Project to Koolmo Construction Inc. in the amount of $5,522.97. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 17. Support of Mound Skate Park—Resolution No. 4765 Sansevere stated he kept it off the consent agenda because he was uncomfortable with asking the residents to make a financial contribution to the skate park. He suggested changing the resolution by deleting the fourth WHEREAS statement, and ending the resolution with Lake Minnetonka Area, deleting “and encourages the citizens of Orono to support the development of this facility through financial and other contributions." Sansevere moved, and Flint seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4765 in support of the development of a skate park in the City of Mound with the noted changes, deleting references to financial contributions. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT *18. Accept Donations for P.arks Sansevere moved, and Flint seconded, to accept the donations from Margaret Merkow ($10.00), Jay and Kendall Nygard ($50.00), and Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik, and Associates, Engineers ($200.00) to the Park Fund, and to express the City's appreciation and gratitude for the donations. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *19. Pay Request and Change Order—Long Lake Fire Station Sansevere moved, and Flint seconded, to approve the Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $7,619.00, and to approve the Application and Certificate for Payment to Ingram Excavating, Inc. in the amount of $225,500.00. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25,2002 *20. Pay Requests—Long Lake Fire Station Sansevere moved, and Flint seconded, to authoriae payment of the invoice from Kirk Program Management, Inc. in the amount of S6415*00, and the invoice from BKV in the amount of 563,682.40. V'ote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *21. Request for Authorization to Dispose of Forfeited Vehicle Sansevere moved, and Flint seconded, to authorize the Orono Police Department to sell by sealed bid one 1978 Ford Van (VIN: E14HHCA2153). Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 22. Schedule Volunteer Commission Interviews The Council scheduled the Volunteer Commission Interviews for March 25'". *23. City Open House Plans Sansevere moved, and Flint seconded, to authorize the expenditure of up to 51,000.00 related to the May 18'^ open house community get-together. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 24. Schedule Work Sessions The Council scheduled work sessions for March 25"* and April 8"* at 5:30 p.m. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT None. *25. LICENSES Gambling Permit—Resolution No. 4766 1.Applicant: Event: Location: Date: Time: Orono Hockey Boosters, Inc. U12 State Girls Hockey Tournament Orono Ice Arena—1025 Old Crystal Bay Road March 17,2002 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. L* ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25,2002 *25. LICENSES—Continued Special Event I Applicant: Event: Race Route: Date: Time: Gear West April Fools Race - S km Foot Race Start and finish at Holbrook Park, Long Lake. To cover Brown Road, Fox Street. Willow Drive, and Grand Avenue. April 7,2002 9:00 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. 2.Applicant: Event: Race Route: Date: Time: Wells Fargo Bank—Wayzata Half Marathon Race Start at Wells Fargo Bank Wayzata, Lake Street to Femdale Road to County Road 15 to Orono Orchard Road to Fox Street to Old Crystal Bay Road to County Road S1 to County Road 19 to Northview Road to Lake Road to County Road 1S to Old Beach Road to County Road 19 to Beehrle Avenue to the Southwest LRT Trail to Water Street. Finish at Wells Fargo Bank Excelsior. May 5,2002 8:00 a.m.- 11:00 a.m. 3.Applicant: Event: Location: Date: Time: Gear West Duathlon (S K Run/30 K Bike/4 K Run) Orono Middle School and Surrounding Areas May 19,2002 7:00 a.m. -1 1:00 a.m. Saosevere moved, and Flint seconded, to approve the above listed licenses. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *26. BILLS Sanseverc moved, and Flint seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Moorse staled that a developer had proposed a plan for the northwest quadrant of Willow and Highway 12 including three story senior co-op housing and accessory retail uses. The residences would consist of senior co-op housing, row houses, and town homes. The retail portion of the development would be pedestrian oriented to service the new community, including a coffee shop, deli, video rental store, and other daily need type shops to create a village atmosphere. B 4000 Q 3»0 Orono, Minnesota bering Index Map LIHsik'.. b' AUUC.I mviiip» iSM am «kMS rraa.fM is,Ma a. lati Hit. W.Mi Mi. ir.lMf JM M,ltM AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY. MARCH II. 2002,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2710 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO. MINNESOTA (•) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council und« the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet • located on the counter nw the sign in sheet ROLLCAU. MIP I I jojjCONSENT AGENDA 1. Approve/Avend cur Or OrtC, APPROVAL Oi MINUTES * 2. Regular Council Meeting of February 25,2002 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS • Pat Wolfe, Representative PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Jeanne Mabusth. Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 3. FOI-2735 Zoning Code Amendment * Lot Coverage by Structures * Ordinance 4. #02*2748 Richard Marzan, 2795 Pheasant Road - Variances * Resolution • 5. #02*2753 Wesley Byrne, 2817 Casco Point Road-Variances-Resolution 6. #02*2755 Long Lake Fire Station-City ofOrono, 340 Willow Drive North-Class in Subdivision, Variance and Conditional Use Permit - Resolutions MAYORKX)UNCIL REPORT PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR'S REPORT CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 7. Pay Request * Long Lake Fire Station 8. Additional Water Patrol Deputies on Lake Mirmetonka 9. Bid Award - 2002 Insurance Package - Resolution 10. 2001 Investment Report (Information Only) 11. Police Department Donation CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 12. LICENSES Special Events • 13. BILLS AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, MARCH 11,2002,7:00 P M ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY. ORONO. MINNESOTA* UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 2m 03/11 -Council Meeting, 7:00 pjn. 03/18 -Planning Commission. 6:30 p.m. 03/23 -Council Work Session, 5:30 p.m. 03/25 -Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 04/01 -Park Conunissioa Meeting, 7:15 pjn. 04/08 -Council Work Seasioo, 5:30 p.m. 04/08 -Council Meeting. 7:00 p.m. 04/15 -Planning Commissioa. 6:30 p.m. 04/22 -Council Meeting, 7:00 pm. 04/24 -Board of Review, H'etbttsdi^, 7:00 pan. %, REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTIOPfc/y y ^2 ITEM NO.: 7 Department Approval: Name Wendy Bottcnbcrg Title Zoning Administrator Adminutrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning item Description: #01*2735 Zoning Code Amendment Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C): Lot Coverage by Structures Standards •Ordinance Adoption Exhibits: A Ordinance B Staff Memo & E.xhibits of Februarv' 19, 2002 Background: Council had requested an opportunity to review City Ordinances as they relate to lot coverage by structures. The Planning Commission held public hearings on November 19.2001, January 22. 2002 and Februar> 19,2002 to review proposed amendments to the existing ordinance. Also, a joint work session with the City Council was held on December 20. 2001 to discuss amendments to the existing ordinance. As a result of the joint work session a change that was studied dealt with hardcover limits for non*shoreland properties less than 2 acres. The limit for how much hardcover would be allowed was not decided, and numerous limits were suggested. Staff put together a study and presented it to the Planning Commission. The study included four neighborhoods in the city where the lots are 2 acres or less in area. With these properties three scenarios were developed: allowing luirdcover s.f. at 50% of lot area allowing hardcover s.f. at 50% of buildable area and allowing hardcover s.f. at 80 % of buildable area. The Planning Commission reviewed the results and decided hardcover limits on non-shoreland properties less than 2 acres would not be appropriate. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the new lot coverage by structures standards at the Februaiy 10. 2002 meeting. The Planning Commission concluded the ordinance should retlect amendments that would include the following in lot coverage by structures calculations: 1. All roofed structures more than 6* above grade level. 2. Tennis courts, patios, decks and all similar “open” structures when partially or fully enclosed by fences, railings or walls more than 6' above grade level. 3. Building protrusions more than 6’ above grade level. 4. Bays or bay windows that act merely as a window will not be included. Those that increase the floor area (i.e. floor to ceiling) will be included. 5. Overhangs more than 2'. J » i V Stafl/PUnning Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommended approval of the new lot coverage by structures ordinance.’ The primary intent of the ordinance revision is to NOT include in ground pools and their associated grade level patios as structures for the purpose of calculating “lot coverage by structures.” Council Action Requested: To adopt the attached ordinance to establish new lot coverage by structures standards. ORDINANCE NO., SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10 OF THE ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 10.03 SUBD. 14 REGARDING LOT COVERAGE BY STRUCTURES. The City Council of Orono ordains as follows: Section I. Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 14. Item C "Lot Coverage" is hereby deleted and the following language substituted in its place: "C. Lot Coverage. In all zoning district, for all lots of 0-1.99 acres in total area, the total combined footprint areas of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 15% of the lot area. EXCEPTION: Regardless of lot area, every developed lot shall be allowed at least 1500 square feet of lot coverage by principal residence and garage structures. The following shall be included in calculation of lot coverage by structures: 1. All roofed structures more than 6' above grade level. 2. Tennis courts, patios, decks, and all similar "open" structures when partially or fully enclosed by fences, railings or walls which extend more than 6* above grade level (if any portion of such structures extends more than 6' above grade level, the entire structure shall count toward lot coverage). 3. Building protrusions which are more than 6 ’ above grade, including the building footprint, and the vertical projection of any parts of the building more than 6* above grade. 4. Bay or bay windows that increase the floor area (i.e. floor to ceiling) shall be considered lot coverage. Bays or bay windows that act as a window^ shall not be considered lot coverage. 5. All but the outer 2* of roof overhangs shall be included in the calculation of lot coverage." The following drawings are included for illustrative purposes: Bay window included in lot coverage Bay window included in lot coverage Bay window not included in lot coverage Roof overhang more than 2' included in lot coverage Section 2. This Ordinance shall be published in THE LAKER/PIONEER newspaper and shall be effective upon approval and publication. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at its regular meeting held the 11th day of March, 2002. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk t ria fr»a r»_ TO;Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members FROM: Wendy Bonenberg, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:Febniaiy 19,2002 SUBJECT: #01*2735 Proposed Amendment of Zoning Code - Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C): Lot Coverage by Structures Standards Exhibits: A Draft Ordinance • Proposed Revision to Lot Coverage by Structures Section B Minutes from January PC Meeting C Staff report from January PC Meeting Summary: The six members present at the January 22,2002 Plaiming Commission meeting reiterated that in ground pools and their associated grade level patios would no longer be considered as structures for the purpose of calculating “lot coverage by structures.” Also, hardcover limits on non* shoreland properties less than 2 acres would not be appropriate. Staff was instructed to draft an Ordinance amendment to the February Planning Commission meeting. The draft is anached as Exhibit A. Staff Recommendation: Provide direction to staff regarding amending lot coverage by structures ordinance. Planning Commission Options: 1. Make a recommendation on the ordinance amendment and forward review of the amendment to the Council for review at the meeting scheduled March 11,2002. 2. Other. . %.%>- » — —— ORDINANCE NO., SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10 OF THE ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 10.03 SUBD. 14 REGARDING LOT COVERAGE BY STRUCTURES. The City Council of Orono ordains as follows: Section 1. Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 14, Item C "Lot Coverage" is hereby deleted and the following language submitted in its place: "C. Lot Coverage. In all zoning district, for all lots of 0*1.99 acres in total area, the total combined footprint areas of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 15% of the lot area. EXCEPTION: Regardless of lot area, eveiy developed lot shall be allowed at least 1500 square feet of lot coverage by principal residence and garage .structures. The following shall be included in calculation of lot coverage by structures: I. All roofed structures which extend more than 6* above grade level. 2. Tennis courts, patios, decks, and all similar "open" strucnnes when partially or fully enclosed by fences, railings or walls which extend more than 6' above grade level (if any portion of such structures extends more than 6' above grade level, the entire structure shall count toward lot coverage). 3. Building protrusions which are more than 6' above grade, including the building footprint, and the vertical projection of any parts of the building more than 6' above grade. 4. Bays or bay windows that act as a window shall not be considered lot coverage. Bay or bay windows that increase the floor area (i.e. floor to ceiling) shall be considered lot coverage. 5. All but the outer 2 ’ of roof overhangs shall be included in the calculation of lot coverage." Section 2. This Ordinance shall be published in THE LAKER/PIONEER newspaper and shall be effective upon approval and publication. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at its regular meeting held the *• \ Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, ML 1 1th day of March, 2002. >ta at its regular meeting held the Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Lindff S. Vee, City Clerk Bay window included in lot coverage nii■iiC,ic ■:::h Bay window not included in lot coverage FI p 4 P f /ul 4 J P f TV • p] m ^1 Bay window included in lot coverage Roof overhang more than 2* included in lot coverage y TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members FROM: Wendy Bottenberg, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:January 17, 2002 SUBJECT: #01-2735 Proposed Amendment of Zoning Code - Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C): Lot Coverage by Structures Standards Exhibits: A Hackberr>' Hill Chevy Chase Drive Webber Hills Chippewa Lane and Tumham Road Map of non-shoreland/less than 2 acre lots in Orono Surveys of properties B C D E F Request: Planning Commission review scenarios regarding hardcover on non-shoreland lots that are less than 2 acres in area. Recommend whether a non-shoreland hardcover ma.\imum should be established for small lots. Summar>': Under the proposed amendment, in ground pools and their associated grade level patios would no longer be considered as structures for the purpose of calculating “lot coverage by structures.” The original lot coverage ordinance adopted in 1989 did not include pools in the calculation of lot coverage. The ordinance was later amended six months after its adoption to include pools and their associated patios. October 22,2001: City Council approved variance application to replace a home on Chevy Chase Drive. Indicating the lot coverage ordinance should be revisited, specifically regarding in ground pools. November 19,2001: Planning Commission recommended approval of changing the lot coverage ordinance to not include pools and associated patios in lot coverage by structures by a 4-3 vote. The majority camp supported the change, but only if accompanied by a new hardcover limitation on all non shoreland residential lots under 2 acres in area (50% was suggested). The minorit)' camp was against the proposed amendment stating pools and their associated patio/decks should continue to be calculated as lot coverage by structure and suggested that decks regardless of height should also be considered for inclusion as lot coverage. November 26,2001: City Council tabled lot coverage ordinance in order to review it in a joint work session with the Plarming Commission and City Council. December 20,2001: Joint work session with City Council and Planning Commission. The following points or changes came out of the work session: Low pools and patios that have no elements higher than 6* above grade should NOT be included in the calculation of lot coverage by structures. Lot Coverage Ordinance January 17,2002 Page 2 Structural coverage calculations shall include building protrusions more than 6' above grade, i.e. not just the building footprint but the vertical projection of any parts of the building that are more than 6* above grade. The outer 2' of roof overhangs shall not be considered as lot coverage. Open decks with any portion of railing above 6' will be counted as lot coverage in their entirety. Hardcover limits for non-shoreland area needs to be looked at closer. The limit was not decided • ideas included but not limited to; 50% hardcover limit, some other percentage or a percentage of the buildable area on a property. Analysis: Of the approximately 3,000 residential lots in Orono, 616 lots are non-shoreland and less than 2 acres in area. (Map-Exhibit E) A small sampling of these properties was looked at to develop scenarios in which to determine the potential impacts of a hardcover limitation. Three scenarios were developed- 50% hardcover on total lot area, 50% hardcover on buildable area and 80% hardcover on buildable area. Four different neighborhoods in the city were chosen where the lots are 2 acres or less in area Hackbeny Hill. Chevy Chase Drive, Webber Hills, and Chippewa Lane/Tumham Road. If a survey was on file for the property dated 1990 or later the property was included in the study. Each area contains lots that are substandard in area as compared to the zoning requirement. Note: Many of the properties did not have surveys on file because hardcover has not been an issue with non-shoreland properties or improvements have not occurred on the property. For example. Hackbeny Hill neighborhood has 20 properties and only 7 had surveys. Calculations of'total lot area" and “buildable area” (total lot area minus setbacks) were then completed for each property. The calculations are in table form (See Exhibits A-D). Hardcover calculations were then completed for each lot showing; a. Allowed hardcover s.f at 50% of lot area. (Scenario 1) b. Allowed hardcover s.f at 50% of buildable area. (Scenario 2) c. Allowed hardcover s.f at 80% of buildable area. (Scenario 3) d. The amount of hardcover existing on lot and percentage of total lot area. Included in the existing hardcover on lot calculation is the residence (including garage), detached garage, deck, pool, driveway and walkways. In many cases, the size of the driveway and walk were estimated because in the past hardcover was not an issue with these properties so vriien a survey was completed hardcover items were not included. i ;• Lot Coverage Ordinance January 17,2002 Page 3 The surveys are included (Exhibit F) to aid visualizing hardcover on the properties. Analysis Results: The analysis shows the following: a. No properties are approaching 50?^ hardcover based on total lot area, even for the small lots, most are less than 30%. b. Some properties have hardcover over or close to 50% buildable area. c. A large proportion of small lots in a large zoning district (See Tumham Road/Chippevva Lane) already have hardcover over 80% of buildable area, because buildable area is so small. Staff Recommendation: Reviewing the three scenarios: -Staff concludes that hardcover limited to 50% or 80% of buildable area does not provide equity to all property owners, because buildable area is so variable for a given size lot depending on the zoning district. -Staff concludes that limiting hardcover to 50% of total lot area is high. Of the properties reviewed, none were close to the 50% hardcover limit. -If 50% is the recommended amount, will property owners add improvements so half of their property is covered? Staff recommends using the total lot area and a percentage smaller than 50% for allowed hardcover, if a hardcover standard is needed at all. The ^frlp attached slows that the actual number of lots less than 2 acres and not in shoreland is a small percentage of the total lots in the city. Planning Commission Options: 1. Recommend hardcover percentage based on total lot area.(Staff suggests 35%, consistent with the 500-1000 ’ zone. 2. Recommend hardcover percentage based on buildable area. 3. Table the matter to a work session for further discussion; direct s*iff as to what additional information could be provided that will be useful. 4. Other. r -. v-: ■ji."” <C Hackberry Hill .5 acre lots (21.780 s.f.)Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Address Total Lot Buildable Area 50% HC Total Lot 50% HC Buildable Area 80% HC Buildable Area Existing HC on lot 22 17.460 s.f.8,740 s.f.8,730 s.f.4,370 s.f.6,992 s.f.5,466.9s.f. 31.30% 35 21.049s.r.11,704 s,f.10,524 s.r.5.852.s.f.9,363.2 s.f.3,192 s.r. 15.20% 65 17,460 s.f.8,855 s.f.8,730 s.f.4,427.5 S.f.7,084 s.f.2,888.4s.f. 16.50% 96 17,050 s.r.8,230 s.f.8,525 s.f.4,115 s.f.6,584 s.f.2,710.8s.f. 15.90% 125 21,700 s.f.13,175 s.f.10,850 S.f.6,587.5 s.f.10,540 s.f.2,557 s.f. 11.80% 140 32,100 s.f.13,260 s.f.11,550 s.r.6,630 s.r.10,608 s.f.2.808.7s.f. 8.90% 185 24,150 s.f.13,760 s.f.12,075 s.f.6,880 s.f.11,008 s.f.4,622.1s.f. 19.10% ^ ■ •♦ *■1 V« .4 Chevy Chase Drive 1 Acre Lot (43,560 s.f.)Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Address Total Lot BuiMable Area 50% HC Total Lot 50% HC Buildable Area 80% HC Buildable Area Existing HC on lot 102 16,847 s.(.7,800 s.f.8,423.5 s.r.3,900 s.f.6,240 s.f.3,545.3 s.r 21% 123 21,294 s.f.10,564 s.f.10,647 s.f.5,282 s.f.8,451.2 s.f.3,309 s.f. 15.50% 125 19,886 s.f.9,794 S.f.9,943 s.f.4,897 s.f.7,835.2 S.f.2,780 s.f. 13.90% 120 27,586 s.f.18,536.5 s.f.13,793 s.f.9,268.25 s.f.14,829.2 s.f.4,113 s.f. 14.90% 133 21,709s.f.11,250 s.f.10,854.5 s.f.5,625 s.f.9,000 s.f.4,210 s.f. 19.40% 142 29,346 S.f.16,900 s.f.14,673 s.f.8,450 s.r.13,520 S.f.8,800 s.f. 29.90% o WM)ber Hills 2 Acres Lots (87.120 s.f.)Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Address Total Lot BuiMable Area 50% HC Total Lot 50% HC Buikfable Area 80% HC Buildable Area Existing HConlot 2055 57,499 s.r.24,029 s.f.28,749 5 S.f.12,014.5 s.f.19,223.2 s.f.4,190 s.f. 7% 2065 44.319 S.f.20,625 s.f.22,159.5 s.f.10,312.5 s.f.16,500 s.f.4,445.7s.f. 10% 2090 51,023 s.f.21,528 s.f.25,511.5 s.f.10.764 s.f.17,222.4 s.f.2,962.0s.f. 5.80% 2100 47,649 S.f.20,099 s.f.23,824.5 s.f.10,049.5 s.f.16.079.2 s.f.3,992.5s.f. 8.30% 2265 51,298 S.f.21,298 S.f.25,649 S.f.10,792 S.f.17,267.2 s.f.1,485 S.f. 2.80% Chippewa Lane and Tumham Road -5 acre lots (217,800 s.f.)Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Address Total Lot Buiktable Area 50% HC Total Lot 50% HC Buildable Area 80% HC Buildable Area Existing HC on lot 4305 Chippewa La 44.700 s.f.4,900 s.f.22,350 s.f.2,450 s.f.3,920 s.f.3,621 s.f. 8% 4315 Chippewa La 44,700 s.f.4,900 s.r.22,350 s.r.2,450 s.f.3,920 s.f.4,688 s.f. 10.50% 4325 Chippewa La 45.447 s.f.5,250 s.f.22,723.5 s.f.2,625 s.f.4,200 s.f.1.918.76 s.f. 4.20% 340 Tumham Rd 45,360 s.f.6,400 s.f.22,360 s.f.3,200 $.f.5,120 s.f.1,527.32 s.f. 3.40% 380 Tumham Rd 49,081 s.f.6,280.4 s.f.24,990.7 s.f.3,140.2 s.f.5,024.32 s.f.3,157.5 s.f. 6.30% • • Properties shown in the heaviest shade of grey indicate lots less than 2 acres in size and are located outside of the Shoreiand Overlay District Water elevations are based on 1997 Met Council Land Use Data and do not reflect the Ordinary High Water Level of Classified Lakes. ClassHtod LakM Non^horeland PropertiM Shoratend Overlay Dtotrict CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR MICHAEL AND THERESA ERNHART OF LOT 8, BLOCK 3. DANIELS LONG LAKE HEIGHTS ORONOGOPY LCCAt nrSCBPTIOM Of PPTUKfg • Lot 8, Bloch 3. OANCLS LONG LAK£ HEIGHTS 1 o : dtootfs iron morliof x. • : dofMtot dittonco o» tlwwn on tho plot o( OANCLS LONG LAKE HEIGHTS T Booring* ihoam or* boiod i4>on on otawnod dotum. Tht* iurvoy intend* to show III* bowidori** of th* obov* d**crbod property. ond the loeetion of on exitting home. dedc. yard bora and btochtop drivevoy tlw*oa it doe* not purport to *hoM ony other improvement* or encroochment*. • . % •• s * * • •*• V•I* •• •. .• . •- -flC *. i, • >*• ?■ ■ .• • -.* •■'. 1 * • , • 9 • i ..t •; . • .j* *. • ',•• ^ • •• '. • •* ■ . • •• i; i ••* y. . •of-Lots U-'and 12 •••• • ••.f/ r *. t MO CGOr 35" VAcfcBer«mj ;bf'iioU"li- andl2;mMk^ Lake Helgbte •' -j Hennepin County, Minnesota S setssof^ ^ ■ •• . /Act o*; Jf V PoAcH/ ? *. i- APPROVED W DISAPPROVE )__SM f>ATg -I O ! '! tv! K I*1. •I. » ■•.’• '■”" ••■:" > -mHi V i:^ tu u.' flJ y u <x; * t n :CITYOFORONO SITEPLANI__ GRADING Wrii? Approved • ;• ITH REVISIONS - M ♦l2.’<qs, ’•'f.'.t'V.i'V'-' N t I n .• • r'Mty. ?.*- pirFi ♦*»r» 2 X i*’r.Vi: V..- ■•vv. ;t Jli I t! .' - ••• ».».• •<; : . -“V- •» • r * >. ■•^ir . -ISIS: Izrail buildings; If any, thereon, and all-,'; ............................... -- •■ .der-* • •.. : * * *' ^! ’ i • *' ‘ • • a'true and^eotrect':^representatlon of a;. ll and'12, Block 27"D^lol'8 Long* Lake ' bri oh said land..; This aurvey:is!nade loah' nou being'placed on the property; .-j toother holder of;such tiortgago ‘orlan7;Lv-’• ' i-Crfr Wrrmm wmiiil ron: ^wicA-^OT^j^YEy ix/y ■fb.cf^Jbwu^ 1 M' ---------<2/____1 W4S ^OROFmo — -Sl '2M tt ^ yn »5^5 J. . '.s ------^ J S^l ’^' fi \ i%5»»v.y W/re/e^ee -' .t ^1i </ M'W/W^ _______^iS.____ I •—•••— . . MVnVy^ \A//^^ - T-rO I ; A^.>r j -jr^9 r~ a^0cyr^. :z>AA//erji3.- jLaAya o OtnotM Iron monunwnt o DanotMOffsitftakt xoooj> OtnotM miftlngttov. (ooo.o) OtnotM PropoMdtItv. OtnotM turfiet draintgt Ptopottd gMtgt floor titv. Proposed loWtst floor titv. ■ Proposed top of foundation tItv. BENCH MARK: n^rtirrm tt ■ r^i . J." “ —inStnf^n*(tiniiin»rfniiiiiwmiiiMaiiii ...............n'lt it ni •'.. %-flutbauj m X > X X UJ ffi X CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR ■ILL R. SIFORO IN LOTS 3. 4. DANIELS LONG LAKE HEIGHTS Hcnntptn County. NinncsotA MAPLE LANE S - fCrirkU'.i.* ^ . ...L . . ...1 )fe¥iir dtlL^ legal oescri That part of erly of the Block 3, Oan I hereby cer prepared by < supervision, registered C Surveyor unc of Nlnnesote COFFIN I SRC Hark S. Gronr Engineers. I Long Lake. H. Scale; 1 inc^ Date : Augus* 0 : Iron r Bearings sho»> •ssuoed datur I -''v4 : } I ; . .; *• » •Mr,i '• Tir^ fi- - m / ' r 1/ .• ^...J i. •• wv * •. •>♦•* n . - ORONO COPYCERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR LARRY GLEASON OF LOT 3. BLOCK 1, DANIELS LONG LAKE HEIGHTS HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNES0TVi» .• • •MdiiKip*i s 69* E f\ CfTYOFOfiONO _«L SITEPUN__ GflAOmcnjUl BAPPAOVEO M«'-n*<0 □ APPROVED WITH REVISKMS 8T_ DATE / ••••M a ■••• 220.00 I ilim o < • - - ‘HJ- - n. 7S^ tJXSVNOi 90.0I_____ Ta 11U HOUSE ^.EXSTMsm % OOSTNC OfMoi q L PCA1 nP<;CPPTIQIi OF Ut Bock 1. OAMELS LONG LAKE IGGHTS 0 : dtnplM iron morkor Boorfri^ ihovn oro boi«^ Mpon on murnid dotm T Thb turvty btondt to Niow tho boundoritt of tho obovo doocrbod proporty, ond tho bcotion of on ORioting houoo, gorogo. and shod thoroorw K dooo not pirpofl to ihow ony othof irnprovomonto or oncroochmonU. TV •*. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Prf portd for *.PI-RHY RICSlDENCi: \ % *m •m oI• • ^ lAi* oo LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Dlock 2, DANIELS LONG LAKE HEIGHTS, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. *• •*—100.00- I ■r^ ^ CITYOFORONO X. SITE PLAN__ GRADING PLAN X^PPROVr02C-Aa;ft' 6A/C APPROVED WITH REVISIONS □ 01 BY DATE 1 !l •» I * * ./o' t-»T '*•' NERM NOTFS tU»r- V. ^ • ■rn liiiiii anriin w ■n'--. ■ Ml. I . T* •. • • • V'-* Idd^Claxyi^GwuiL Qih. a«]l CM«rpr«M OrKt •to Mil#li •» NUfc—> 10 HX ptoMc MN ^J4 (€12) 7U-1M0 fAX:7»-1iaJ CITYOFORON JL. SITE PLAN__ QRAI 0 APPROVED-OeCK. C APPROVED W^THREVISIC 0 NNQPLAN NS DATE ^ T-3-OI 1 |THE RQm_UND COMPANY, IMP OHcvY cNAse omvc u ORQNO m CHEVY CHASE DRIVE MU; mm. Wktom PLM tr t osi H0ii9ir«. mm vouca toon tmemuk mjm roo mom mm MV.' M « Mr M ooMMMurv «r m mmrnn ter or M WMPoyn MrtiKy U)«T aOQII a£VA7)QN ______ TOP or BLOOC OXVADON: _____ CAPAOC S>t OCVAnON: _____ TOO • LOOKOUT QXVAnON:_____ MV Mf cf«Me«« eon Mr If m Migatask .1 KaUbllihcd lit 1962 LOT SURVEYS COMPANY. INC. LAND SURVEYORS REGIsmBD UNOKR THI UW9 OT 9TATC OF IIWNC90TA 9M1 nrd kwmwB Nortli •19- Pit Ni. NltMifilte. UtmmamU ••4M 9ttrvr\|0rs (SrrHfiralr NVOCE FANO^ :r'y :.Cy.1SISM ili-sa SCALE: 1- - o 39* O Omrnlm Wm4 Sil hf mamnmm mtjf M4foao tOCCR SmUNAN Prepcfty locited U Stcifoii 3€» lOMSblp 118, Ritfi 23. Hemieplfi CoMiity. NfmicioU IMtilii WfiM 0r« PripMil yt9 n Vi tiAiicI to r«ilto if Ml iMto iliJM to diMtoi vllii ^ ftouiiui' > f X? 1 - i^ 1 — ■ >>■'“« Ti. *1 fvu. e«MMCK>r VJALtuour •• 1.^ Ctvci/. dUulLtr. niiniin ifmv T\ l<^‘b ^»aocfer- .... . rrk«-rt«r«ri-A’tf y ill-IUATE OP SURVEY for OROHOCOPVDavid and Jean Sahlstrom Address: 129 Chevy Chose Drive DETAIL B / uo detail c szc DETAIL fi 0.45 0.35 invo vOvft • OJO^ • ON SEE detail a 0.00^ pV'7.9: LO SEE detail C PROPOSED addition — cantilever 1 Sfi 19.08^^^ FIREPLACE / lXn5* P fJ I \ cx* Cy y o^' ✓ g y> nl> (VU to fiaii"^6 o WICK riREPL P----CYCLONE1 FENCE }S&7iN 07W5V V > ^ STE PL- B approved ^ □ approved ‘ □ DiSAPPr' ‘V•Mlh.-. ITK » % DATE. j ' -.•.A..' T------------*T- TIITTi^i / DETAIL A ‘•OT ^EA » HOUSE AREA PROPOSED ADDITION AREA 27.586 SO. FT. 2.350 SO. FT. O DENOTES REBAR SET FOR BUII.niNC nrrcrr LEGAL DESCRIPTION SURVEY FOR; JEggV PBOULX |rUVtii^y Gosemen'l' J.l ^ ---- ------------ Prepared By; ORONOCOPir r. 162182»OOt 4i7»\6(5^qa: SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. A fNOINICIIt •tUMVCVOnS *FI.ANNfflt toil. TltTlHa • INVIllONMiHTAL SIMVICIt !•••• WAVtATA atVA. MIAMITONAA, MN. MMf lllli i4A-ftt| fAli DESCRIPTION-own Bpf Lot 17, Block 1, HILL 0*WAY MANOR, according to the recorded plat thereof. GENERAL NOTES- 1. •-Denotes Iron monument found. , 2. o - Denotes iron moument set , CITY OF ORONO ^ SITE PLAN__ GRADIN6(Rfi(w^ B-APPROVED - C □ APPROVED WITH REVISII^ □ disa ™o‘“‘ BY_^kX cv'^^cjv'P *YVaiTuminoua VeA?P°' Ckjuuu Olxi^ *o This.drawing has been checked and reviewed this day of " b^r-_ _ _, 19 ^5. I hereby certify that this survey was prepared under iqy supervision and that I am a Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Theodore 0. kemn T\ Date:License No. 17006 iMa. enr. .“ ^ Tv«w*ry. ^,>.> ! '*'^.!'ioNp' ' ■,li-r,•■.>• '.. ■feiSi-:'-?■jl-i':':‘.‘-.‘ •;JrA■ Ai;,',.' -iV- )k'.v--.v in. ■ : S ‘ss; ..■■! fi'* 7A V^Uv--. ■‘SI •(.■ .’ -• • i-; ' fs!/' '■ f.i..-. • If'-- ■' E Miinr r ^ •uu atiuT I »«(ik • • UCOA » a • QK tfr ar MyaaiV »■» jM um m. fwf UM acmt • m MU na uiv w «• 11/9 • un • • miMnn. IMMMI MM MU • m V IM MBA • uiM u r\ ■ M • «Mi4 m n MU 14 BUM mu • M iB n ff^&me£[}.fycit£Ex?. ws.e’ul:'ZT4^>o jgg. ;<afe«£ft^4floB:“ ‘.r .*- nhagJ.imML '^gSSSgj^smc-- toUi srrsWiSvP BMi y PT 1 1 • L t/ o S t/)53a if P I P P I -VP- =:!iOdS WJJhiiM I ,r*0'T.O«4IMA<teANO UTILrrV CA9CMENT 289 lM-” /'•' PL*T or *ittetR Mias •.*1^ CITY OF ORONO £. SITE PLAN__ GRADING PLAN ? APPROVED t^o a inr^O u APPROVED V/ITH REVISIONS j 0 stpo.;c. ja BY _________ 0ROW copy ... Wleiytin UC(La C N osnnr « u. .1 Cerllficale of Survey for Kevin H. Krueger Of lot 6, Block 2. WEBBER HILLS Hennepin County, Minnesota • I » y ••• • .1 !•.11 1* -Fe)t -STREET- ^ V.-/ / T\ ^T.t. i--0<-r <l^t..r.. , ^ CITYOFOrtONO A SITE PLAN__ GRADING PLAN XAPPROVED □ A?PP0V€0 WIT>i REVISIONS □ OiSAPpftOVl ^ ________________________ DATE i49. Ot 0 5 -T2/rj .C2S2 >, 7^.3L ' «l;... .wx 3 K %V V I § ^>3/5 ChA^peMJX) Uxjf)e^ Certificate Of Survey for Gregory J. Halldin of Lot 2. Block 1, Chippewa Hennepin County. Minnesota • • •• s 0 0 I hereby certify that this is a tru»’ and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of Lot 2. Block 1, Chippewa, the location of all existing buildings, if any. thereon, and the proposed location of a proposed deck. It does not purport to show other improvements or encroachments. f #.T CKippfcwa COFFIN & GRONBERG. INC. L ariA.i 2k^ J JLUuy Mark S. Gronberq V\c.Gronberg Lie. No. Engineers. Land Surveyors ft Planners Long Lake. Minnj :» t SEPZtBn • 1 r «>4-W ■ ~ -1 itf I-I^^fl r*r i • f w I ORDINANCE NO.«SECOND SERIES CrwiMrNi, mfettiNG MAR 1 ] 2002 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10 OF THE ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 10.03 SUBD. 14 REGARDING LOT COVERAGE BY STRUCTURES. The City Council of Orono ordains as follows: Section 1. Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 14, Item C "Lot Coverage" is hereby deleted and the following language substituted in its place: "C. Lot Coverage. In all zoning district, for all lots of 0-1.99 acres in total area, the total combined footprint areas of all principal and accessory ’ structures shall not e.\ceed 15% of the lot area. EXCEPTION: Regardless of lot area, every developed lot shall be allowed at least 1500 square feet of lot coverage by principal residence and garage structures. The following shall be included in calculation of lot coverage by structures: 1. All roofed structures more than 6' above grade level. 2. Tennis courts, patios, decks, and all similar "open" structures when partially or fully enclosed by fences, railings or walls which extend more than 6* above grade level (if any portion of such structures extends more than 6* above grade level, the entire structure shall count toward lot coverage). 3. Building protrusions which are more than 6' above grade, including the building footprint, and the vertical projection of any parts of the building more than 6* above grade. 4. Bays or bay w indows that increase the floor area (i.e. floor to ceiling) shall be considered lot coverage. Bays or bay windows that act solely as a window shall not be considered lot coverage. 5. All but the outer 2' of roof overhangs shall be included in the calculation of lot coverage." The following drawings are included for illustrative purpo.ses: J 0 8 II ? / Lil B Bay window included in lot coverage Bay window included in lot coverage Bay window not included in lot coverage Roof overhang more than 2' included in lot coverage t l Section 2. This Ordinance shall be published in THE LAKER/PIONEER newspaper and shall be effective upon approval and publication. Adop IJ by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at its regular meeting held the 11th day of March, 2002. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk L-..- «jwcri-3 Cni Application Dale: 1/22/02 Completion Dale: 1/22/02 60 Day Deadline: 3/19/02 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ” "fETINa miI t Department Approval: Name Wendy Bottenberg Title Zoning Adminstrator/Planncr DATE: 2/25/02 ITEM NO.'7 Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: II02-2748 Richard Marzan 2795 Pheasant Road - Variance Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-ID One Family Lakeshore Residential District (I acre) 46,560 s.f. (1 .069 acres) List of Exhibits: A B Resolution Staff Report and E.xhibits of 2/19/2002 Application Summary: The applicants own the subject property and are replacing the existing residence. They are requesting a hardcover variance (0-75') to allow a 216 s.f. deck and 20 s.f. shed located by the lakeshore to remain on the property. A portion of the deck has a roof, but is not enclosed. Discussion: January. 2002 the applicants received a permit to build a new residence on the property. Ihe new residence meets all standards for the LR-IB zoning district All that remains in the 0-75' setback zone are steps leading to the lake. deck. shed, and two retaining walls. '1 he topography of the property is fairly flat except approximately 45 ’ from the lakeshore. At that point it drops significantly to the lake. There is not a permit on file for the deck or shed, however it appears it has been there for many vears. Researching citv files, a boat house was located there at least until 1986. The zoning code allows stairways up to 4' wide, but landings no more than 32 s.f. in area. Decks and roofed shelters are not allowed. The shelter is painted white and is quite conspicuous against the brown retaining wall as viewed from the lake. Pertinent Code Section: 1. Section 10.22. Subd. 1 (B): Lakeshore Setback: No principal or accessory structure shall be located within 75 feet of the lakeshore. Variance Request: 1 o permit a variance to allow a deck to be within 75’ of the lakeshore. 2. Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (E,F): Water Oriented Accessory Structures/Stainvays Lifts and Landings: The only water oriented accessory structures that are allowed in the 0-75' setback zone are lock boxes up to 20 s.f area and no more than 4' high. Stairways up to 4' wide are allowed in the 0-75' zone with landings (i.e. decks) no more than 32 s.f in area. ^•1 PLANNING COMMISSION:f The Planning Commission recommended by a 4 to 2 vote to: The majority camp supported keepin*' the deck and shed wth the following conditions: 1. Allow the 216 s.f. deck to remain. 2. Allow the shed to remain as a lock box. The shed would need to be cut down to meet the 20 s.f. in area and no higher than 48 inches by code. 3. Paint the lock box brown to blend in with the environment. 4. The roof over the deck shall be removed. 5. The applicant is notified that the deck is nonconforming and if it needs to be repaired it will have to be brought into conformity. The minority camp was in agreement with all of the above, except the deck should be reduced in size, possibly to the same width as the dock. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the enclosed resolution which reflects the majority recommendation of the Planning Commission. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution. Ml ■■ annAi !■> A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1(B) AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16(E,F) FILE NO. 02-2748 WHEREAS, Richard Marzan and Nancy Marzan, (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 2795 Pheasant Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lot II, Pheasant Lawn, Hennepin County. Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1(B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (E,F) to allow an existing 216 s.f. deck to remain in the 0-75' setback zone where a deck of only 32 s.f. in area is allowed as a landing. WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 19, 2002. at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. 1 This application was reviewed as Zoning File #02-2748. The property is located in the LR-IB. Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District, where 43,560 s.f. or I acre is the minimum required lot area. The property consists of approximately 46,560 s.f. or 1.069 acres. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 19,2002 and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: Page 1 of 5 ■i iifliinauM n trnminrt nuaHTlMi 4. 5. A.Applicants are replacing the existing residence on the propert>. hence all existing accessory structures are subject to review and potential removal per Zoning Code Section 10.03. Subd. 9. B.The steep topography to the lake requires some form of landing to transition from the steps to a dock. C. D. A portion of the property is located within the bluff line. There is a limited amount of level land adjacent to the lakeshore. making access to the lake difficult without a deck or landing area. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serv e as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary’ to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and w ould be in keeping w ith the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Start', comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1(B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (E.F) to allow a 216 s.f. deck and lock box by the lakeshore where a deck of 32 s.f. in area is allowed, subject to the following conditions: 1.Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. Page 2 of 5 n 111 111' r ^ L The deck will remain at 216 s.f. The roof over the deck shall be removed. The shed shall be turned into a lock box (20 s.f in area and no higher than 48 inches). 1 he shed/lock box shall be painted brown to blend in with the environment. 3.The applicant is on notice that the deck is nonconforming and when it needs to be repaired it will be required to be brought into conformity. 4.Authorities granted by the variances run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or these variances will expire on that date (March 11.2003). 5.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of the variances shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6.The undersigned owners have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 11th dav of March, 2002. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Pioperty Owners STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was aeknowicdged before me on this 11th day of Mareh, 2002 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and -aid instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Page 3 of 5 __^ Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN dav ofThe foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _______ , 200 ____by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of ..20 personally appeared before me, ____ who is personally known to me ____ whose identity I proved on the basis of. whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation witness a credible and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of ,20 personally appeared before me, ____ who is personally known to me ____whose identity I proved on the basis of. whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation witness , a credible and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 1 ... . o £::hibit. fSS3] fn-M 948' ti 20 “ £lfni \49.3 v\ &aa -* ^5.61 Nl 1^ I- Slory llllnSyack'und'irfS^s^ -?d»5«.rL B --------------------------------------------^ 't2 “ Pkt«•^tfL SSJLH n 55.2, l6’*jBox0ld«r» to ^ruc* 18 “ Spruce u'^“ Pine, S ' Pine 12 “ Pine • }0 Spruce truce <?•> I 88‘07’1 A E -149.97-SURVEY LINE .946' -952 •50----•94a ■940 944 * • Oeeir 21» Zq. HConorvto tt*t Nttf 12 Sqn..930 WATER ELEVAT10N=927 5 ON 10-12-00 3:iiH h.UA*jc^ lOrtc (ccic-bcX- , . . • ,. JiO^.^ OjX^prt.tA'feolOiJtCn WiSxm Ji r< f(^]> a Page 5 of 5 J . L, I rfTi^f ■mmioiTr-iir r dn-n'k in 1 < .■-,«r-k. .?r •.'ra,'..-.»rrjs-..- TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: Wendy Bottenberg, Zoning Administrator/Planner February 4,2002 SUBJECT: ^02-2748 Kathryn Alexander on behalf of Richard and Nancy Marzan 2795 Pheasant Road Variance -- Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) 46,560 s.f. (1.069 acres) List of Exhibits A Analysis Worksheet Application Survey/Site Plan Photo of Property Plat Map Property Owner’s List Hardcover Worksheets Section 10.56 Subds. I6(E,F) B C D E F G H Pertinent Code Section: 1. Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (B): Lakeshore Setback: No principal or accessory structure shall be located within 75 feet of the lakeshore. Variance Request: To permit a variance to allow a deck to be within 75' of the lakeshore. 2. Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (E,F): Water Oriented Accessory Structures/Stairways Lifts and Landings: The only water oriented accessory’ structures that are allowed in the 0-75' setback zone are lock boxes up to 20 s.f. area and no more than 4' high. Stairways up to 4' wide are allowed in the 0-75' zone with landings (i.e. decks) no more than 32 s.f. in area. Application Summary: The applicants own the subject property and are requesting a hardcover variance (0-75') to allow a 216 s.f. deck and 20 s.f. shed located by the lakeshore to remain on the property. A portion of the deck has a roof, but is net enclosed. Discussion: January, 2002 the applicants received a permit to build a new residence on the property. The new residence meets all standards for the LR-IB zoning district All that remains in the 0-75’ setback zone is steps leading to the lake, deck, shed, and two retaining walls. /<02-2748 Richard/Nancy Marzan 279S Pheasant Road Variance 2/4/2002 Page lof2 10 ■'l The topography of the property is fairly flat except approximately 45' from the lakeshore. At that point it drops significantly to the lake. (See Exhibit C). There is not a permit on file for the deck or shed, however it appears it has been there for many years. Researching city files, a boat house was located there at least until 1986. The zoning code allows stairways up to 4' wide, but landings no more than 32 s.f in area. Decks and roofed shelters are not allowed. The shelter is painted white and is quKe conspicuous against the brown retaining wall as viewed from the lake. Statement of Hardship Tlie applicai'.ts have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit B. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Issues for Consideration 1.The steep topography to the lake requires some form of landing to iriu'.sition from the steps to a dock. There is not a permit on file for the deck or shed by the lake, however it appears it has been there for many years. 3. 4. The deck and shed are in good condition and structurally sound. The deck and shed do not obscure adjacent neighbors views of the lake. 5. 6. The new residence conforms to all zoning standards. Is there a legitimate hardship that supports approval for keeping the roofed structure and the deck? 7. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation ; Planning Commission should determine whether these are sufficient hardships shown to allow anything more than the stairway and a 32 s.f. platform to remain. <t02>2748 Richard/Nancy Marzan 2795 Pheasant Road Variance 2/4/2002 Page2of2 * Iw 1 ANALYSIS WORKSHEET LR-IB Lot Area Required 1 Acre Actual 1.069 Acres Hardcover Calculations Distance from shoreline Total area in setback Allowed hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover 0-75'11,415 s.f.Os.f. <0%) 258 s.f. (2.26%) 258 s.f. (2.26%)* 75-250 ’26,426 s.f.6,606.5 s.f. (25%> 6,549 s.f. (23.6%) 6,549 s.f. (23.6%) 250-500’8,719 s.f.2,615.7 sf. (30%) 910 s.f. (10.4%) 910 s.f. (10.4%) * Steps not included in calculations, they are allowed by code. Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 46,560 s.f.Allowed: 6,984 s.f. Existing: 4,694 s.f. 13% 10.08% -—■ 6 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 “* (S50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 Afrer-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORNUTION Site Address Appikatioo# OZ-Zl*^^ Date Received /^ZZ^Ot. Amount Paid 4zsO Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) .o(- i\n ^^3 — COO::i Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Proj^ftjuAcquired____________________________________ I (do) ((oojigD^Iso own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: ^ residential other (specify)_____ _ Zoning Pi-trirf \ lr -1 g> ____________ (month/year) APPLICANI^ . Phone (home) LelTj-fiCgO — Name Phone (work) T1 ^ ^yr — City: __Zip: Phone (home)________________ Phone (work)_________________ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ^ Address: Cit^Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $_______________ Describe request in detail: ■/fTFT-h (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED ___Lot Area ___ Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear .Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore V_Other (specify) Ac< <js«yry /*J±eL fi IL\RDSHIP/DESCRlPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: <>pei^:rbeg. \VJ (attach additional sheets if necessary) iU6£t£ #2 X*.0 y REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the followtn£ information mu«t be submit ted bv the aDPlicarion d*adliw« date in order for vour application to be con!iider*d gompl»t»; 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Completed Application Form Certified Frope^ Owners List of owners within 150*. labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-5910). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/i" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (I) copy 8'/i" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8'/2" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour vananct IIPPliC8tion is not complete if the above information haa not hern included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (stuff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true ^ correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWNER’S SIGNATURE The owTier hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have w authonz^ agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the mating. < ;-» •»T «ir J J rW o • ;4 1 T Pheasant Road mm OfVAW«fl7^ ON 10-12-00 bOllEe WATER ELEVA7ION*927.5 ON 10-12-00 BtismotoalcA \ *>' •, .C .-:^v •V • % , V an zzH/n- :23- 7 \ /♦ 0j ^;gT«^ y -' ^£' 1^1.1 •ntf dil* fttvn Oj^y/Ccwnf^/intf Sm pr? C-.-I'iim **'i - iiirim < ^V*r» V“4^ - 4-— mJH DATE tl/lA/f2 DATCM St2 OWNED NAHE TAXPAYED NAHE/ADOE SO 21-117-2S 2S 0014 •••SO ADDDESS UNASSIOIED PHEASANT LAWN NONEOWNEDS PHEASANT UWN NONEOWNEDS 2700 PLEASANT DD EXCELSXOD HN S5SS1 NENNEPIN COUNTY PDOPERTV XNFODflATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LXST SO 21-U7-2S 2S OOIS •270i PHEASANT DO T J HANONEY OKA NAHOiSY TXHOTHY J HANONEY 2700 PHEASANT DD EXCELSXOR HN 55SS1 DEPORT NO. P14SS401 PAGE 0 SO 21-117-2S 2S %%2S 02705 PHEASANT DD STEPI«N L OARRE ETAL STEPHEN L OARRE 2705 PHEASANT DD EXCELSXOR HN 55SSX PROP ADDD OWNED NAHE TAXPAYED NAHE/AODR PROP ADDD OWNED NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR SO 21-117-2S S2 OiOX 12791 PHEASANT DO L N 0 L C SUNDET LELANO N SUNDET 2791 PHEASANT RD EXCELSXOR HN 55SS1 SO 21-117-2S S2 0004 •2OI0 PHEASANT DD LARSON PROPERTIES LLC D W LARSON SOX ODOADWAY AVE S WAY2ATA HN 55S91 SO 2I-117-2S S2 0102 02795 PHEASANT RD D A NARZAN 0 N NARZAN RICHARD A 0 NANCY NARZAN 2795 PHEASANT RD EXCELSXOR HN 553SI 30 21-U7-2S 32 0005 •2709 PHEASANT RD JOG TEYNOD GAIL H 0 JOSEPH T TEYNOR 2709 PHEASANT RD EXCELSXOR HN 55331 SO 21-117-2S 32 OIOS 02799 PHEASANT RD ELHER J HARTXNSON ELHER J HARTXNSON 2799 PHEASANT RD EXCELSXOR HN 553S1 TOTAL BATCH 502 00000 X CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFODHATXON AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF HY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE /-/7-02SZ^. 1/1 • ^ • 1 ha: cover calculation workst tt SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE OWE)/^ O-TT > TS-TSa* TSB-SCIT ^IKll A. Kd» r^n gARDCOVTa in zons usr!i X X X B. Gangs • • ♦ • C Crf»«w^y D. SidcwiSc E. Padc/Cesk F. Lasdscape Undcriaia ___________ By Plaade __________ ; L/AiH X X X X X X X X X C. Other TOTAL KARECOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE B ____X ICO ppnposgp HARDCOVER IN ZONE A House Lssra B. Catafs ‘iKtA C Driveway D. Sidewalk E PadoA^eck X X X F. Landscape ^\tkc Urderlaa ______________ By ?!asda - X X X X X X X X X G C±cf total HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE B ____X 100 S0O>10G0* ♦ • •^ G/f-' 7 c? • .* //;i? ZZ. Ao. ss. ss. SJ. ss. ss. ss. ss. SE. S--. Sx. SJf. ss. ss. ss. ,SJf. SE. A ’SJT B ' % dllfiL \[% SF. SS. S.F. SS. S.F. SE. SE. SS. _ Sx. SS. [ss. ■ ss. ’sE. ptr».vu+kci t<jCCcU-^ SJ. ' V t 3-^. ^SS. A Sx. 6 ■ % TiXar ^OYER CALCXTLATIOJJ WOSJCSET^T ./j. -vz. setback ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* ’7s-ua*S53-5C3* ^isn FA^DCOVm IN 7QN^ A. Ectss Uss^ s X X B. Geifs • • • • C Tkimny X X D. Sdjg9n3i X X £. Patic/Dcdc X X F. Lsdsa^ Uedcrixia By ?iKS& X X X G. Other TOTAL KARECOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE + B ____X ICO fftQPOSFP gARDCQVTR fN 70V£ A. House X X X B. Carsge C Dnve%vxy X X D. SldswxSc X X E. Psdo/Ceck X X F. L2cdsc=re Ltderfea By ?\xszs X X X a C±er total KARECOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ♦ B _ _ X ICO 530-1CC0' 'zr ^<icB 70.dZ«> hi^l !C^ ZJ. SJ. ST ZJ. s^. SJ^. s^.zs. SJf. ZI. ZJ. zs. ZJF. SJ. zs. A B H SJ. ZS. ZS. S.F. S.F. ZS. ZS. ZS. zs. zs. zs. zs. zs. zs. zs. • SJ. A “zs. 5 " S ••E> ^COVER CAI.CULAT1<»‘ WOSXS^TZT ■• J ' r I rs *1 i ; { \ _______ ^ !• i •>9^ •> T? § 10.56 3. Bluff impact zones. Structures and accessory facilities, except stairw’ays, laddmgs, and lock boxes, must not be placed within bluff impact zones. 4. Uses without water-oriented needs. Uses without water-oriented needs must be locatdi^n lots or parcels without public waters frontage, or, if located on lots or parcels with public watelh^ntage, must either be set back double the nonnal Ordinary High Water level setback or be substant^ly screened from view from the water by vegetation or topography, assuming summer, leaf-on c^ditions. S. Fb^es, docks, retaining walls. No fence shall be placed within the shore setback zone. Portions of do^located landward of the OHWL shall be considered as a landing, subject to the regulations for^dings per Subdivision 16 (F) of this section. Retaining walls shall not be placed withinthe shore setback zone. •6.‘ Average lakolmre setback.'No principal or accessory structure shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the ayerage distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots, except that this not apply to stairways, lifts, landings, and lockboxes. Further, the average lakeshore setback shallapply only to classified lakes, and shall not ^ply to tributaries. The average lakeshore setback line sh^^be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the imm^iately adjacent lakeshore lots. D. Minimum Lowest Floor Elevations. All structures located within the Shoreland Overlay District which are subject to the flood plain regi^ons of Section 10.55 of this ordinance shall be placed at an elevation consistent with the requiiments of that section. The regulatory flood protection elevation shall be established as set forth in Se^n 10.55, Subd. 7 of this code. All structures constructed within the Shoreland Overlay District shall Htwe their lowest floor, including basement, placed at an elevation no lower than the regulatory flood protection elevation. Where the regulatory flood plain elevation cannot reasonably be determined, the inl^um elevation at which the lowest floor, including basement, may be placed shall be determined^follows: I. For lakes, by placing the lowest floor at a level at least 3^t above the highest known water level, or 3 feet above the Ordinary High Water Level, whichever i^gher. above the flood of record. 2. For rivers and streams, by placing the lowest floor at least 3 f< E. Water-oriented Accessory Structures. The only water-oriented accessory structure allowed to be located nearer the Ordinary High Water Level than the normal structure setback as specified in this section shall be a lock box no greater than 20 square feet in area and no higher than 48 inches in height. Such a structure requires a building permit from the City. ORONO CC 376-12 (2-24-92) § 10.56 F. Stairways, Lifts and Landings. Stairways and lifts are the preferred alternative to major topographic alterations for achieving access up and down bluffs and steep slopes to shore areas. Stairways, li^ and la'«dings shall be allowed in the shore setback zone and must meet the following design requirements. 1. Stairways and lifts must not exceed 4 feet in width. 2. Landings for stairways and lifts shall not exceed 32 square feet in area. 3. Canopies or roofs are not allowed on stairways, lifts, or landings. 4. Stairways, lifts and landings may be either constructed above the ground on posts or pilings or placed into the ground, provided they are designed and built in a manner that ensures control of soil erosion. 5. Stairways, lifts and landings must be located in the most visually inconspicuous portions of lots, as viewed from the surface of the public water assuming summer, leaf- on conditions, whenever practical. 6. Facilities necessary to provide shore area access to physically handicapped persons shall be allowed provided that the dimensional and performance standards of subitems 1 > 5 are completed in addition to the requirements of the Miimesota Regulations, Chapter 1340. 7. A building permit shall be obtained for construction of stairways, lifts and landings regardless of whether such improvements are constructed above, at or below grade. G. Steep Slopes. Any applicant requesting a permit for construction of sewage treatment^y^ems, roads, driveways, structures, or other improvements on steep slopes, shall provide adequate inlbnaq^n to allow the City to evaluate possible soil erosion impacts and development of visibility from'pub^c^ters before such permit may be issued. When determined necessary, conditions shall be attache2No4smed permits to prevent erosion and preserve existing vegetation screening of structures, vehicles, andtxh^facilities as viewed from the surface of public waters, assuming summer, leaf-on vegetation. H. Height of Structures. No structure within dteShocelmd Overlay District shall exceed the height limitations set forth in the standards for the underlying^tmios district ORONO CC 3.V-13 (2-24-92) Complete Dale: 1/23/02 60 Day Deadline: 3/20/02 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MAK 1 1 2002 Cl I T unuivU DATE: Febniaiy 28.2002 ITEM NO.‘7 Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator Adminnirator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:«02-2753 Wesley B>me 28 17 Casco Point Road Variances LR-IC • Single Family Lakeshore Residential DistrictZoning District: List of Exhibits \ Resolution B Sur\ey C Planning Report Application Property owners have revised their variance request based on recommendations from the Planning Commission. The revised request is to allow hardcover in the 75-250* lakeshore setback to pemiit additions and remodeling to the e.xisting house. There are two proposed additions to the house. I'he first would replace an existing attached garage with a 32 ’ X 35' two stor>’ addition. The second addition would be a 20' X 30' attached garage with future living space located above the garage. The property owners only intend to keep the existing house and foundation. The open porch, garage, and deck are being removed to make room for the new additions. 75-250 Lot Area = 11,375 s.f Existing Hardcover = 4,155 s.f. (36.5%) Proposed Hardcover = 3,564 s.f (31.3%) Allowed Hardcover = 2,844 s.f (25%) As a result of the proposed plan the total hardcover on the property would be reduced. There is currently a large driveway and parking area on the property that would be reduce'^ in size. The total hardcover is still over the 25% limitation in the 75-250' lakeshore setback requiring the variance. Planning Commission Recommendation On February 19, 2002 the Planning Commission reviewed the application and recommended approval by a vote of 6 to 0. The recommendation was based on the following comments and conditions. The granting of a variance to hardcover in the 75-250’ setback was approved with the understanding the hardcover in that area will be reduced from what currently exists; and subject to #02-2753 Wesley Byme 28 17 Casco Point Road Page 2 of 2 _________ the condition that if the existing foundation needs to be replaced or repaired in any substantial manner that the variance granted will be revoked and a new revised application shall be resubmitted for additional review; and 10’ side setback shall be required and total lot coverage by structure not exceed 15%. Applicants have submitted a revised plan based on the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and no longer require variances to side setback or lot coverage. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the attached resolution be adopted approving a variance to hardcover in the 75- 250’ setback based on the revised plan dated 2-21-02, by Mark S. Gronberg, Gronberg and Associates. A copy of the site plan is attached to the resolution as Exhibit B. .'■* •. t- - 4ift. ....■ nrifffrilwTififlin i A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2; SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) 2 FILE NO. 02-2753 WHEREAS. Wesley Byme and Brenda Byrne. (hereinaBer "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 2817 Casco Point Road w ithin the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Attached “Exhibit A’*, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) 2 to permit 3,564 s.f. (31.3%) hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback where 4,155 s.f. (36.5%) exists and 2,873 s.f. (25%) is allowed, to permit additions to the existing house; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 19, 2002, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #02-2753. 2.The property is located in the LR-IC, Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District where 'Z: acre is the minimum lot size and 100 feet is the minimum lot width. 3.The Planning Commission reviewed the application for variances and recommended approval by a vote of 6 to 0 based on the following findings and hardships: Page 1 of7 L 4. 5. Planning Commission finds that a lot width and lot area variance is not required since the existing house walls and foundation will be used, without structural repairs. If the walls or foundation are found to require structure repair or replacement the property would require an application for additional variances to lot area and lot width. B The Planning Commission recommended the total lot coverage by structure shall not exceed 15%. C. The proposed additions do not require variances for location or size. D.There is a large driveway and parking area on the property that would be reduced in size. The total hardcover in the 75*250' setback would be reduced by 591 s.f. E.The existing house is located 72' from the street property line requiring a longer driveway to serve the property. An existing garage is being removed to allow for construction of a new garage. F.Applicants have requested to add to the existing house rather than build a new structure on the property. Owners have stated the existing foundation and building will not be removed or altered as part of the remodeling plan. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property: would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or ditTicult>; is necessaiy to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of7 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22. Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56. Subdivision 16 (L) 2 to permit 3,564 s.f. (31.3%) hardcover in the 75-250 ’ lakeshore setback where 4.155 s.f. (36.5%) exists and 2,873 s.f. (25%) is allowed, to permit additions to the existing house subject to the following conditions: 1. The existing shed and all hardcover proposed for removal shall be completed prior to a final inspection. 2. Final drainage plans shall be reviewed by the City Engineer to ensure drainage is properly directed. 3. The property shall be developed in conformance with the site plan attached as E.xhibit B. 4. If it is determined the existing foundation is required to be replaced or repaired all variances approvals shall be revoked by the City of Orono and a new variance application shall be submitted by the applicants. 5. Authorities granted by the variances run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or these variances will expire on that date (March 11,2003). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of the variances shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned o\sners have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Page 3 of? Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 11th day of March, 2002. ATTESl: Linda S. Vee. City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Applicants STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 1 Ith day of March, 2002 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN day ofThe foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _______ ____________. 200 ____by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of7 ri\ STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of ..20 _ personally appeared before me, ____ who is personally known to me ____whose identity I proved on the basis of ____whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation witness .a credible and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of ..20. _ personally appeared before me, ____who is personally known to me ____ whose identity I proved on the basis of ____whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation witness ., a credible and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public • } ; i ‘X Page S of 7 i "3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : Por. 1. AM that port of Lot 120 in Spring Park and oM thot unplatted lend and thot portion of Lake Shore Avenue vacated, lying between Lot 120 of Spring Pork, and the side linesvof said lot projected to Loke Minnetonka, according to the plot thereof on file or of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said Hennepin County, which lies Southeasterly of o line running porollel with and 5 feet distant North westerly from the Southeasterly line of soid Lot, and the extension thereof. Par. 2. Lot 119, Spring Park, including that port of Lake Shore Avenue vacated, ond that part of the land between sa'jd vocoted ovenue and the shore of Lake Minnetonka lying between thte side lines of said Lot 119 extended to the shore of Lake Minnetonka, occording to the recorded plot thereof. Page 6 of 7 „Tc< 66-29' 00" E ^3.49-^ LAKE Page 7 of7 i t'j <3 TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator February 14,2002 SUBJECT:#02-2753 Wesley Byrne 2817 Casco Point Road Variances • Public Hearing Zoning District:LR-IC, One Family Lakeshore Residential District ('/j acre) List of Exhibits: A B C D E F G H Application Plat Map Survey.'Existing Property Conditions Survey/Proposed Property Conditions Elevation Views Main Level Floor Plan Hardcover Calculation Worksheets Property Owners Notification List Application Summary Property owners have requested variances to permit additions and remodeling to the existing house. There are two proposed additions to the house. The first would replace an existing attached garage w ith a 32' X 35' two story addition. The second addition would be a 20’ X 30* attached garage w ith future living space located above the garage. The property ow ners only intend to keep the existing house and foundation. The open porch, garage, and deck are being removed to make room for the new' additions. Pertinent Ordinances/V’ariances requested 1.Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (2). Total proposed hardcover exceeds allowed hardcover by 813 s.f 75-250 Lot Area = 11,375 s.f Existing Hardcover = 4,155 s.f (36.5%) Proposed Hardcover = 3,657 s.f (32.1%) Allowed Hardcover = 2,844 s.f (25%) As a result of the proposed plan the total hardcover on the property would be reduced There is currently a large driveway and parking area on the property that would be reduced in size. The total hardcover is still over the 25% limitation in the 75-250' lakeshore setback requiring the variance. m-2m Wesley Byrne 2817 Casco Point Road February I9« 2002 Page 1 of 4 1 Other hardcover removals include reducing the size ofthe lakeside deck, removal of a shed located near the street, an open porch on the streetside of the house would be removed for the garage addition, and a sidewalk and wood planter box would be removed from the west side of the property. Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B). To permit a 9.7' side setback for the residential addition located at the northeast comer of the new house. The property lines are slightly narrower by the street than at the lakeshore. This situation caused the corner of the house to encroach into the required setback. It was not until after the house was designed and drawn on the survey that the encroachment was discovered. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C). The proposed lot coverage by structure is 2,612 s.f. (15.6%). The Zoning Code permits up to 15% of the lot area to be used for structure on the property. The total lot area is 16,750 s.f., which allows a total of 2,513 s.f. (15%) of lot coverage by structure on the property. Lot coverage by structure ordinances were adopted to preserve space between buildings and regulate the massing of structures. Additional structure also contributes towards additional hardcover which can negatively impact water quality by not allowing storm water to run across natural ground surjace. The concept is to allow storm water to be slowed and to infiltrate into the ground. Staff had requested Gronberg and Associates, surveyor/engineer, to reveriff their final calculations to determine the actual size of the proposed house. The total structure was confirmed to be 2.612 s.f which is 99 s.f more structure than the property is allowed Statement of Hardship Applicant has included a hardship statement that is included as part of Exhibit A. To summarize the hardship the property owners state they are expanding the house to be comparable to other houses in the neighborhood, and they arc adding to the existing house closer to lake rather than towards the street to protect an 80 year old oak tree. Site Drainage Staff received the final site grading and drainage plans on February 14* and have not had an opportunity to complete review as of the date of this memo. Any recommendation of approval shall require additional City Staff review of the plans prior to any Council action. «02-27S3 Wesley Byroe 2817 Cisco Point Road Febniiry 19.2002 Page 2 of 4 PLANNING COMMISSION OPTIONS FOR ACTION I. Approve variances noted above 2.Table 3. Deny, stating reasons 4. Other Action Staff Recommendation StafThas recommended the applicants reduce the size of the house to not encroach into the side yard setbacks. Staff also recommends the additions be reduced in size to not exceed 15% lot coverage by structure. Staffs opinion is the hardship statement does not support a structural lot coverage variance and a side setback encroachment. As noted above, the City looks at what is best for the long term plan for the City. When ordinances were adopted for structural lot coverage the City adopted this to limit the amount of development in neighborhoods, and create space beUveen buildings. Additional structure also contributes towards additional hardcover which can negatively impact water quality by not allowing storm water to run across natural ground surface. The concept is to allow storm water to be slowed and to infiltrate into the ground. Property owners and Plaiming Commission may want to consider additional hardcover removals on the property, notably the 0-75' lake setback zone. A review of the final grading and drainage plan will determine if the lot can accommodate the proposed additions. A copy of the plan has been forwarded to the City Engineer for comment. I02-27S3 Wesley Byrne 2« 17 Casco Point Road Felmwy 19,2002 Pa(e3or4 ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Lot Area; LR-IC Lot Area Required '/i acre Actual 16,750 s.f. (0.77 acre) Structural Coverage; Hardcover Calculation; Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage 16,750 s.f.Allowed: 2,512 s.f. (15%) Existing: 2,044 s.f (12.2%) Proposed: 2,612 s.f (15.6%) Distance from shoreline Total area in setback Allowed hardcover Existing hardcover Proposed hardcover 0-75’4,875 s.f Os.f 462 s.f (9.4%)462 (9.4%) 75-250'11,375 s.f 2,843 s.f (25%)4,155 s.f (36.5%)3,657 s.f (32.1%) 250-500'500 s.f 150 s.f (30%)138 s.f (27.6%)119 s.f (23.8%) 1 *02-2753 Wesley Byme 2817 Casco Point RomI Febnwy 19,2002 Pa|e4or4 - lim.- i'i tiS', « CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 (SSO.OO per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) AppBcatfon # 0& • Date Received Amount Paid PROPERTY INFORNUTION Site Address ^y/7 Pg C <1 f A Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)_ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired ^ /^f________________ ufiacenI (do) ^o also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: ufesidential ___pother (specify)_ Zoning District:______________ ___________________ .(month/year) APPLICANT Phone (home) X'H'^/" 7f7'i _______kyrk t—_______ Phone (work) frJL Address. City: LtJiv Name Wfi CLa^ ft t OWNER (if different than applicant) ----------------------------------------------------------------I a ^ddress:____________________ Phone (home). Phone (work) City:.Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost S Jl oo ooo Describe request in detail: Oe ^ fL 75* A> xro ^ •rvt-io-.k- Hk-«iL IsUm. H>Um» imt. t<m ^ Uf'J t'ktKSii. Ow.' /•V* (attach additional sheets if necessary) i i / ~TI // AJ/<I a A<ro Oh fL tt*i'-*<** i-f*- Ihi kd VARIANCES REQUIRED'^**“*‘' •"* '* currt^Xy. Lot Width Side) Lot Area Setback: Lot Coverage Front X Hardcover _ 7 S'- 2 so __Rear ___ Average Lakeshore Other (specify) '^^IriARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difHculty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: T/e L. Lake, if- Lem.** ih fL. me'/U. l^J. ^// fQfil A A. of 1. ^ (attach additional sheet/ if sa^5 ------------- •Jf if_r*i neces f Wire. otk 4»j( yuQ Wcfc/ |f fit. He'ifk^r^^ 7V»e /ck>e Ac A,Ao OH M*tr •fh^ cC f/i REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All fff tht..folloiVing infoimation must be submitted bv the applicatinn Headline da«* In order for vour application to be conaid«red gompli»ti»; 1. 2. Completed Application Fonn Certified Prope^ Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you fine laef --------- _____ vv • 3. must obtain this list, laWs and map from Hennepin County Department of I, Govt CeA<?,-348-5910), A,v.,/-X- t L jJ 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Finance, A-603, vjovi cemer, j4»oviu;. oJi I Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and incluiie hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8‘/j" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8 Vi" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy BYi" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour yariaptf appIlMtion not complete if the above information has not been inrlMd^l APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge Applicant's Signature Date I'll' OWNER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's Signature ^ --------------------- Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an appUcant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building Sl Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. \aJ i-"57i ? K o. 1/ - {' i-ff ^ u '.Vx' fP 'T^ '■~' •y-r^ ■ . HT ^ 2o-/^7- 3 3-(3^ ■• l.xrnrxmtailj3^ -i. ^ parcel Information^^:., v: xl4 yi‘ S Cl J&. - :"Jr^...................'^Wre«l ID 20117233200 •* !.♦ ■ • ' \<M X - ■n£ . ^. ♦ ♦Houm Numbrnr 2817 K3320010j (.m: ■i^. 3 » -- r .' I . ^ , St^ Nam« CASCP'MIIH fhiii$not»hg^Pioofd9dmap. H npitunta « cw^jil^iibfi, _, mtd data fnmOly. County, sndSta^tomimilMI/Ujiindcihiif^pijicI^ III iriiiftfii^fiifciill ii^fclliiMil'liiHiliil I >1 I III! Ill ifcliVliliiy T ‘ 66*29* 00" E ^3.49-^ f \ \LAKE ....gHORE \ AVENUE CONTOUR UNC I • II 1 11 i-i I I • Ti ■ II III I i>r'ir^ SI! SSSllll ■■ !■ ■B It. ^ ^ lwy.777Cr777T;7ip/(/;.W^ .»til. I, .. i.. I iiriHfiM* k 111 rt 3 life M I I,' 1 I I I f 1 M f ■ ^ ‘t, M I l: I full I ci! lil m • • • * •• \\\ .T'r FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION rV^ % i» 'i • >.l •■ ♦•• . •! \ ■ . ; >itti i-«. <>%. •-»> A r HARDCOV SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) ' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A House_____________ 4 (CIO /c -€-oo LCULATION WORKSHEET 75-250' 250-500’ 500-1000' Lingth X X B. Oarage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain ByPIutie Or Fabric X X 0. Other jre^S ^^3 ^ ? Uf/u. J X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERT Y AREA IN ZONE A B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A House _____________ X Length X X X B. Oarage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric 0. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ __ ♦ B S.F. Width SJ. S.F. S.F. S.F. ST. ST. ST. ST. 2e/ S.F. ST. ST. S.F. S.F. /sz ^ ^ S.F. Viz ST. A xlOO 7S S.F. B 9. yg % S.F. Width S.F. ST. '■ST. S.F. S.F. ST. JA/Hf Af Ae*t/€ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. xIOO - ST. A ST. B H G ' ? •• \ c I I ; < ' i MM*^ Mdl 1 aie r rid Ttm A ■ T-. ♦ •, . ii'^Wh SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) EXBnNCHARPCOVER IN ZONE A. House (4/fJ fi'TAA/£ /O-^'Oo HARDCOVER CALCULATION wnWKSmrF.T ^ 250-500*0-75' Ungih B. Osrage X X X C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk 0^-7/X X E. Patioi0eck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X 0. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A • ________ + B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE' A House X Length X X X B. Oarage C. Drivew^X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X 0. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + B Widlh xIOO Width xlOO - 500-1000* /SZf SJF. ______SI. ______S.F. S.F. €9 SI. SI. SI. njLsi. ___ S.F. 2^9 S.F. ______SJ. S.F. S.F. SJ. Vy SF S.F. A //. T-yJ* S.F. B z^o\S.F. S.F. SJ. "SF. S.F. io4r S.F. S.F. SJ. S.F. m SI. S.F. ST. SJ. SJ. SJ. IhSl SI. A SJ. B • *-• tft v..< l4/fJ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-7S’ 7S-2S0* <25^500T> SOO-1000* EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A House _____ ____ X _____________ - _____________S.F. 1 Ungih X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X 0. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ _ B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A House _____________ X Length X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ _ B Width S.F. SI. S.F. SJ. /28 SJ. S.F. S.F. S.F. ST. ST. ES IS B S.F. S.F. ST. • B /J8 S.F. ST. xlOO o ST. B 9-f.io V« S.F. Width S.F. S.F. ■S.F. S.F. _ revise :! "Miyfv// M.r • S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ST. ST. S.F. S.F. ill xIOO _____ST. ST. Z3.R ' % SOO A B RUN OATI tl/lS/tZ ■AKN BtS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INPORNATION SVSTEH PROPERTY OHNERS LIST REPORT NO. PX4SMn PAGE 12 • P OmiCR NAME TAXPAYEK NAME/AMNI M 2I-117-2S 92 AMA •2924 CA9CO POINT ffD HAM C A PATRICIA A TNONPSOH tURK E I PATRICIA A THOMPSON 2R24 CASCO POINT RO VAVZATA NN 55591 58 28*117-25 52 8987 82829 CASCO POINT RO 0 E PETERSON I N P PETERSON BRYCE E PETERSON AND NARY PAT PETERSON 2829 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA HN 55591 58 28-117-25 52 8888 82825 CASCO POINT RO DAVID J YORKS 8 NlfE DAVID J YORKS 2825 CASCO POINT ROAD WAYZATA NN 55591 PROP ADOR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 58 28-117-25 52 8889 82821 CASCO POINT RD R E DENSNAR 8 N N DENSHAR RONALD 8 NAROARET DENSHAR 2821 CASCO POINT RD VAVZATA NN 55591 58 28-117-25 52 8818 82817 CASCO POINT RD VESLEY C BYRNE VESLEY C BYRNE 2817 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA HN 55591 58 28-117-25 52 8811 82815 CASCO POINT RO G 8 C SCANLON GENE 8 CATHERINE SCANLON 2815 CASCO POINT ROAD WAYZATA NN 55591 PROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 58 28-117-25 52 8812 82815 CASCO POINT RD J L STERN J L STERN 2815 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA NN 55591 58 28-117-25 52 8815 82811 CASCO POINT RD THERESA A NORSTED THERESA A NORSTED 2811 CASCO POINT RO WAYZATA NN 55591 58 28-117-25 52 8814 82887 CASCO POINT RO J N 8 P S BAILEY JOHN N 8 PATRICIA S BAILEY 2887 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA NN 55591 I PROP ADOR OWNER NANE NANE/AOOR 58 28-117-25 52 8814 82888 CASCO POINT RD THONAS B KING THONAS B KING 2888 CASCO POINT ROAD WAYZATA NN 55591 38 28-117-25 92 8817 82818 CASCO POINT RO TANNV L WOODIS TANNV L WOODIS 2818 CASCO POINT ROAD WAYZATA NN 55591 TOTAL BATCH 585 88811 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION« TO THLStSJ OF NY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DAT ii « iI y e J ^ ”1 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CnM»ir»i| mi=e TING mar 1 1 2002 Cl I V ur UhUi^o Date: March 7,2002 Item No. Department Approval:Administrator Approval: Name: Michael P. GafTron Title: Planning Director Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: ^02-2755 Long Lake Fire Station, 340 Willow Drive North - - Preliminary Plat - Approval Resolution - Setback Variance • Approval Resolution - Hose Tower Height CUP - Denial Resolution List of Exhibits A - Resolution for Preliminary Plat Approval B • Resolution for Variance Approval C - Resolution Denying CUP Preliminnry Plat On February 25 Council voted 4-0 to approve the preliminary plat to create a lot (Lot 1) for the fire station; an outlet (Outlot A) for future residential use, currently to be retained in the ownership of the City of Orono; and a new public road, the name of which has yet to be determined. Council was asked to conside an appropriate name for the new road. The draft plat name, “Willowfire Addition" can be revised if Council wishes to do so. The attached Resolution granting preliminary plat approval incorporates findings and conditions as discussed at your February 25 meeting, including: - waiving park dedication for Lot 1, and deferring park dedication for Outlot A - charging the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee for Lot 1, and deferring it for Outlot A > language regarding the intent that lighting and signage for the Fire Station be low-key - applicant to be charged for the out-of-|K>cket (engineering/legal) fees for processing the subdivision Setback Variance On February 25 Council voted 4-0 to approve the setback variance. The hardships and factors justifying the variance approval have been incorporated into the attached resolution, in addition to the condition that the variance becomes null and void if the sixth bay is not condtructed. •‘"'(>2-2755 I A>ng 1 ;ikc l ire Station March 7, 2(M)2 Payc 2 Tower llei^hl (TP Denial On I cl^ruarv 25 (’ouncil \otcil 4-0 to ilciiy the Cl P \\ Inch woiiM liav e alK'wei! tlie lu>se tower t>.> be constriietetl at a heiglit i>r35*. The attached resolution lor ilenial ineoipi>rates IliKlmes oi lact which support llie denial. ( Ol N( II. ACTION Hr.Ql K.STH) 1 . .Adopt or amend the attached preliminary pl.it res«dution ( onlirm the n.ime ot the pl.it aiul iletermine the n.ime ol the new public ro.id (the tinal pl.it ilr.ivMiies c.innot be completed without these two pieces oTintorm.ition) 2. .Ailopt or amend the .itt.icheii resolution lor \ari.ince appro\al ,\iii>pt or amend the .iit.iched leNolution denyine the hose tower lieieht Cl P i 7r * r % i i r A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A SUBDIVISION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 340 WILLOW DRIVE NORTH - FILE NO. 02-2755 WHEREAS, Ronald J. Moorse on behalf of the City of Orono (hereinafter the “subdivider") in February 2002 filed a formal subdivision application with the City of Orono (hereinafter “the City”) for approval of a two lot plat of property legally described as: All that part of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 34, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the Sth Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the West line of said Southwest 1/4 distant 1876 feet North of the Southwest comer thereof; thence North along said West line 387.8 feet; thence East parallel with the South Ime of said Southwest 1/4 a distance of 693 feet; thence South parallel with said West line 387.8 feet; thence West 693 feet to the point of beginning. Hennepin County, Minnesota. (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono ’s Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 19, 2002, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on February 25, 2002 the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of the subdivider, and on a vote of 4-0 approved the preliminary plat subject to a number of conditions and directed City staff to draft a preliminary plat approval resolution documenting findings of fact and conditions of preliminary plat approval; aitd W'HEREAS, the Orono City Council makes the following findings of fact in relation to this application: 1.The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of two acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created residential lot. Page 1 of8 L .. .. . . 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. The property is guided by the 2000-2020 Orono Community Management Plan for single family residential use at a density of 2-3 units per acre. The property contains a total of approximately 6.17 acres gross area, or 5.88 acres of land exclusive of the 33’ of right-of-way used for Willow Drive North. The proposed plat creates a 2.04 acre lot (Lot I) to accommodate the proposed new Long Lake Fire Station; a 3.42 acre outlot (Outlot A) to be retained by the City of Orono for potential future residential use upon replatting; and dedication of right-of-way for a new public road to serve the subdivision. The plat will also dedicate 33' of right-of-way for existing Willow Drive North. The plat will be served with municipal sewer and water service extending westward from Long Lake at the east boundary of the site. An easement corridor 40* in width bisecting Outlot A will be dedicated to accommodate the sewer and water extension. There are no City-protected wetlands located on the property. A preliminary wetland delineation has been completed for the property and has confirmed that linear wetlands protected under the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) exist along the southerly and easterly borders of the property, such wetlands being approximately 0.58 acres in area. The net property area exclusive of Willow Drive right-of-way and exclusive of WCA-protected wetlands is 5.30 acres. Proposed Lot 1 contains approximately 1.90 acres of non-wetland area and 0.14 acres of wetland. Proposed Outlot A contains approximately 3.05 acres of non wetland area and 0.37 acres of wetland. In order to accommodate the proposed Fire Station, approximately 0.20 acre of wetland, primarily in Lot I, will be filled. Mitigation meeting or exceeding the required 2:1 ratio for this filling is planned to occur within Outlot A south of the existing drainageway, by creating new wetland from existing upland. This plan is subject to final approval by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Stormwater ponding to serve the Fire Station will be developed in Outlot A, north of the existing drainageway and south of the proposed sewer and water easement corridor. The area planned for this proposed pond is large enough to allow some expansion to serve future development within Outlot A. If the future Page 2 of8 9. 12. 13. development of Outlet A results in the need for expansion greater than can be accommodated south of the utility corridor, a second ponding cell could be developed to the north of the utility easement. The area of Outlet A that will be undevelopable due to casements for existing wetlands, wetland mitigation, stormwater ponding and sewer and water utilities is approximately 1.74 acres, leaving 1.68 acres in Outlet A for future development. A portion of the 0.38 acre area of the utility corridor could be usable for roadways or driveways serving development in Outlot A. Although the property has not yet been rezoned to conform with the 2000-2020 Community Management Plan, proposed Outlot A is large enough (exclusive of the necessary easements to accommodate wetlands, wetland mitigation, stormwater ponding and utility easements) to accommodate reasonable future residential development at the guide-planned density of 2-3 residential units per acre. Lot 1 will access directly west to Willow Drive per the approved Fire Station site plan, and will also gain access to the new public road south of Lot I. Outlot A will gain access to Willow Drive via the the new public road south of Lot 1. The City expects that in the future the new public road will be extended into Outlot A either as a public road or a private driveway as part of a future development. There is no intent at the present time to extend the new’ road eastward to connect with roads in Long Lake, however, the “outlot" status of Outlot A allows for decisions on the ultimate road configuration to be deferred until Outlot A is developed. Because the Fire Station is a municipal building which creates no new impact on park use or park needs, it is appropriate to waive the Park Dedication requirement for Lot 1. Because the future use of Outlot A is not determined. Park Dedication requirements for Outlot A should be deferred until such future time that Outlot A is developed. Because the Fire Station site -will be approximately 60% hardsurfaced, the station will have stormwater impacts potentially even greater than if the site was used for residential development. Ther"'ore, the Fire Station shall be subject to the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk «e per Orono Municipal Code Section 3.22. Page 3 of8 Because the future use of Outlet A is not determined, the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee for Outlet A should be deferred urtil such future time that Outlet A is developed. 14.Because required improvements to the property are being completed as a Joint project of the Cities of Long Lake and Orono, the standard requirement for Developers Agreement and Financial Security should be waived. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat application of Ron Moorse on behalf of the City of Orono per the preliminary plat drawings by Thomas J. Steams, a licensed surveyor of SEH, Inc, dated February 1, 2002, subject to the following conditions: I.Applicant shall dedicate on the plat 33' of public right-of-way for Willow Drive North per the above-referenced preliminary plat drawing. Additionally, applicant shall dedicate public right-of-way for a new public road on the plat instead of the road outlot depicted in the preliminary plat drawing. Said new public road shall be named_________________. 2.Lot 2 as depicted on the preliminary plat drawing shall be platted as Outlot A rather than as Lot 2. Outlot A is intended for future development. However, no future development of Outlot A shall occur until such time that Outlot A is replatted into one or more Lots. 3.Lot 1 shall be allowed direct access to Willow Drive as well as to the new public road south of Lot I, per the approved Fire Station site plan. Outlot A shall access the new public road as shown on the preliminary plat drawings. The new public road south of Lot 1 shall be constructed to City of Orono urban section standards at a width of 28'. 4. Stormwater, drainage and wetland mitigation: Prior to final plat approval applicant shall provide a final wetland delineation report for the property id'' *ifying the boundaries of WCA protected wetlands and showing the wetland buffers required by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Page 4 of8 5. 6. 7. 8. The wetlands and buffers shall be subject to covenants advising future property owners of the limitations on alterations of said features. Drainage easements shall be designated over all wetlands, draliiageways and stormwater ponding areas as shown on the preliminary plat drawings. The City will not grant final plat approval until the site grading, drainage, stormwater and wetland mitigation plans have been approved by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Applicant shall construct all stormwater and drainage improvements and wetland mitigation according to the approved plans and adhering to Best Management Practices for Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas. The Park Dedication requirement for Lot I is w'aived. The Park Dedication requirement for Outlot A is deferred until such future time that Outlot A is developed. Lot 1 is subject to the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee per Orono Municipal Code Section 3.22. The amount of such fee shall be $13,220 (calculated as 2.04 acres x the commcrcial/industrial rate of S6.480 per acre per the 2002 Orono Fee Schedule) and shall be paid upon final plat approval and prior to filing of the subdivision with Hennepin County. The Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee for Outlot A is deferred until such future time that Outlot A is developed. The standard requirements for Developers Agreement and Financial Security in relation to site improvements are hereby waived. It is the Council's intent in approving this preliminary plat to accommodate the needs of the citizenry of Orono, Long Lake and Medina by providing a site for a new Long Lake Fire Station; however, because of the location of the site in a rural residential neighborhood, it is imperative that the character of that neighborhood be preserved to the greatest extent possible. Ancillary elements of the Fire Station use such as lighting and signage could have negative impacts on the neighborhood if not developed in a subdued, low-key manner. Therefore, the applicants are advised to work with City staff in ensuring that the lighting, signage and other elements of the Fire Station use are developed in a manner sensitive to the surrounding area. Pages of 8 9.Subdivider is hereby advised that preliminary subdivision approval will expire within one year of the date of Council approval, March II, 2003. Should the subdivider fail to complete the filing of the final plat application within the year deadline, it shall be necessary for the subdivider to file a new preliminary subdivision application with the City. Final Plat Submittals: The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. These submittals are as follows: I.Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies (one copy for the City’s records and one for filing with Hennepin County) and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200'. Drawing to include: a.Lx>t lines platted per preliminary survey by Thomas J. Steams of SEH, Inc. dated February 1, 2002, except as modified below. b. c. Dedication on the plat of 33' of right-of-way for Willow Drive North. Dedication of drainage and utility easements 10' wide along the exterior boundaries of property and 5’ along the internal lot lines, per the sketch attached as Exhibit A. Designation and dedication of drainage easements over wetlands, stormwater ponds and drainageways as shown on the preliminary plat drawing. e. Naming of the plat. 2. Legal documents required: a.Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. Page 6 of8 b.The applicant must provide certifled copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c.Signed and executed Drainage Easements to be granted over drainageway and detention areas within plat. d.Signed and executed covenants advising future property owners of the limitations on alterations of the WCA wetlands and buffers. 3. Fees to be paid: Total due: $13,470.00 + S. a. Final plat fee = $250.00 b. Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee *» $13,220.00 c. Engineering/legal costs incurred in processing this subdivision ($___) Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Mirmesota at a regular meeting held this 1 1th day of March, 2002. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara Peterson, Mayor Page 7 of 8 4 - n —— STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this__day of 2002 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of ,, 2002 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 8 of8 .. ,.t' V. I r . ..* •t*‘i MtltiA A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 3 FILE NO. 02-2755 WHEREAS, the City ofOrono is owner of the property located at 340 Willow Drive North within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: All that part of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 34, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the Sth Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the West line of said Southwest 1/4 distant 1876 feet North of the Southwest comer thereof; thence North along said West line 387.8 feet; thence East parallel with the South line of said Southwest 1 /4 a distance of 693 feet; thence South parallel with said West line 387.8 feet; thence West 693 feet to the point of beginning. Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter “the property ”); and WHEREAS, said property is being subdivided which will result in the creation of an outlot, a public road, and a building lot for the proposed Long Lake Fire Station to be owned jointly by the Cities of Orono and Long Lake, said building lot to be hereinafter referred to as “Lot l";and WHEREAS, for zoning purposes the City Council of Orono has determined that the Fire Station to be constructed on Lot 1 shall be subject to zoning performance standards similar to those required for a school, church or other institutional or municipal building in a residential zone in the City of Orono, said standards requiring a 50' building setback from all lot lines per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.20, Subd. 3; and WHEREAS, Ronald J. Moorse on behalf of the City of Orono has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.20, Subd. 3 to permit the construction of the Long Lake Fire Station at a setback of 40' from the south lot line of Lot 1 where a 50' setback is normally required; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 19,2002, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. Page 1 of 7 Minnesota: 2. 3. 4. 5. NOW« THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #02-2755. The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of two acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created residential lot. The property is guided by the 2000-2020 Orono Community Management Plan for single family residential use at a density of 2-3 units per acre. Municipal buildings are a Permitted Use in the RR-1B zone, and the Fire Station to be constructed on Lot 1 is considered by definition as a municipal building. Lot I will contain land totaling 2.04 acres in area. There are no City-protected wetlands located on the property. However, a preliminary wetland delineation completed for the property has confirmed that linear wetlands protected under the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) exist along the southerly and easterly borders of the property, such wetlands being approximately 0.58 acres in area. Lot 1 will contain approximately 1.90 acres of non-wetland area and 0.14 acres of wetland. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 19,2002 and recommended approval of the variance by a vote of 6 to 0, finding that the variance is supported by hardships as stated in the staff memo dated February 15,2002 and that the variance will have no impact on the neighborhood or adjacent properties. Planning Commission recommended that approval be revoked, however, if the sixth bay of the Fire Station is not constructed, thereby making the building smaller and negating the need for the variance. 6. The City Council hereby makes these additional findings of fact: The site plan for the Fire Station has been developed by the joint Fire Station Committee and reviewed by both City Councils. Site layout has been significantly influenced by a number of factors including: Page 2 of? 2) the necessary north-south building orientation to allow for direct fire apparatus'*xit onto Willow Drive without requiring additional turning movemenis; driveway aprons required on east and west sides of the building bays to allow for fire apparatus ingress/egress, necessitating that administrative and training spaces be located on the north or south ends of the building; road / driveway access to the rear of the building must allow for the necessary wide turning radius of fire apparatus; proximityto the existing/future Willow Drive bridgeover the RR and the new Highway 12 route; site limitations imposed by width of the site, as well as by the location of existing linear wetlands on the site, and the need to create a road corridor to provide access to the rear of the property for future residential use; soil conditions which require extensive soil correction work and which limit use of the southerly portion of the site for building purposes. The setback variance for the fire station is directly attributable to the occurrence of linear wetlands along the south property boundary. These wetlands must be preserved to the greatest extent possible, and a 16' buffer is additionally required. Due to minimum City requirements for road and shoulder widths, the road/driveway corridor had to be widened to 60' as it enters the site from Willow, and even wdder to minimize wetland impacts toward the rear of Lot I. Nevertheless, a road corridor is necessary to access the rear of the site. A road corridor along the north lot line would be undesirable from a safety starapoint due to proximity to the Willow Drive Bridge over new 1 2 coupled w’ith the dual fire apparatus return access and residential use this corridor must serve. The most feasible location for the road corridor is south of the station, and the characteristics of the land dictate the location of the corridor. Page 3 of? 8. The location of the fire station is relatively fixed based on the need for parking lot access and parking stalls on the north end of the building, minimum setback requirements, and the required length of the building to serve the needs ofthe fire department. Moving the building an additional 10'northward to avoid the variance would have resulted in re-design of the site plan and the building. The planned construction of a temporary bridge over the new Highway 12 corridor which will impact a significant portion ofthe northwest comer of the site, makes it impossible to shift the building to the north. Also, a stand of mature coniferous trees would be destroyed if the building was moved to the north. The basis for a 50' side street setback requirement for institutional/municipal buildings is to minimize the impact on the surrounding neighborhood. The fire station will be situated 100 feet from the south lot line of the property, and the road will be moved further off the lot line to avoid impacting the linear wetlands. Both factors tend to minimize impact of the variance on the only directly affected neighboring property, the Mi Her residence to the south. That residence is located approximately 100 ’ from its north lot line, or about 200' from the fire station building. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property and in relation to Lot 1 are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserv'e a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 4 of 7 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.20, Subd. 3 to permit the construction of the Long Lake Fire Station at a setback of 40* from the south line of Lot 1 rather than the SO' setback required, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicant attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2. In the event that the sixth bay of the Fire Station is not built, this variance approval shall become null and void and a SO* setback shall be met. 3. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (March 11,2003). 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of Lot I immediately upon filing of the plat creating Lot I. Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 1 1th day of March, 2002. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara Peterson, Mayor (For the City of Long Lake)(For the City of Orono) Page 5 of? STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this__day of_________2002 by Barbara A. Peterson. Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this_day of .2002 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of ..20. personally appeared before me. ____ who is personally known to me ____whose identity I proved on the basis of ____ whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation of _________________________, a credible witness and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public Page 6 of7 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of ..20 personally appeared before me, ____who is personally known to me ____whose identity I proved on the basis of whose identity I proved on the oath/afTirmation of a credible witness and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public Page 7 of7 A RESOLUTION DENYING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.75, SUBDIVISION 1 FILE NO. 02-2755 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is owner of the property located at 340 Willow Drive North within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: All that part of the Southwest l/4ofSection 34, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the Sth Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the West line of said Southwest 1/4 distant 1876 feet North of the Southwest comer thereof; thence North along said West line 387.8 feet; thence East parallel with the South line of said Southwest 1/4 a distance of693 feet; thence South parallel with said West line 387.8 feet; thence West 693 feet to the point of beginning. Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter “the property ”); and WHEREAS, said property is being subdivided which will result in the creation of an outlot, a public road, and a building lot for the proposed Long Lake Fire Station to be owned jointly by the Cities of Orono and Long Lake, said building lot to be hereinafter referred to as “Lot 1"; and WHEREAS, for zoning purposes the City Council of Orono has determined that the Fire Station to be constructed on Lot 1 shall be subject to zoning performance standards similar to those required for a school, church or other institutional or municipal building in a residential zone in the City of Orono, said standards limiting maximum building height to 30' per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subd. 5(A); and WHEREAS, Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.75, Subd. 1 allows increases in height for specified building features including fire and hose towers subject to approval of a conditional use permit; and WHEREAS, Ronald J. Moorse on behalf of the City of Orono has applied to the City for a Conditional Use Permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.75, Subd. 1 to pennit the construction of a hose tower as part of the Long Lake Fire Station, such tower to have a flat roof at a height of 35* above grade where the maximum allowed flat roof height is 30'; and Page I of 5 WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 19,2002, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and Minnesota: 1, 2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #02-2755. The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of tw o acres of contiguous dry buildable land w ithin each newly created residential lot. The property is guided by the 2000-2020 Orono Community Management Plan for single family residential use at a density of 2-3 units per acre. Municipal buildings are a Permitted Use in the RR-IB zone, and the Fire Station to be constructed on Loi 1 is considered by definition as a municipal building. Lot I is located in a rural residential neighborhood, with the nearest residence being approximately 200 ’ directly south of the proposed Fire Station building. The proposed flat roof of the hose tower will extend approximately 12' above the 23 ’ flat roof height of the majority of the Fire Statioi> building. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 19,2002 and recommended denial of the conditional use permit by a vote of 6 to 0, based on the following findings: The proposed hose tower is intended to be used for training purposes and will have a potential negative visual impact on the neighborhood due partially to the non-residential character of the tower. Its use for training purposes has a potential to become a nuisance in this residential neighborhood, especially if it becomes a training center for other departments. Page 2 of 5 c) The need for the excess tower height has not been demonstrated, and there may be otiier options, such as building it 5' further into the ground. d) The potential impacts of the tower in this residential neighborhood cannot be satisfactorily mitigated. 6. The City Council hereby makes these additional findings of fact: The City has consistently denied building height variances for homes and institutional buildings in single family zones. Two most recent examples are the Minnetonk.T Art Center, and the Burton residence on Rainey Road. The Fire Station is being located in a neighborhood setting rather than a ‘town center’ setting. Reducing the visual impacts of the building is important to ensure its successful integration into residential character of the neighborhood. Although the 20' x 22' area of the tower covers just under 3% of the total roof area of the station, and although it is in the southeast or rear comer of the station, the tower if constructed will still have a visual prominence that is out of character with the surrounding residential neighborhood. Because a primary purpose for the excess hose tower height is for firefighter training, the tower if constructed would contain stairways, windows, a door to the roof, etc. which w ould allow for a variety of realistic firefighting and rescue scenarios to be staged. The impact of such activity occurring at such a visually prominent location and height as that proposed would potentially have a negative impact on the neighborhood. The negative impacts on the neighborhood associated with the excess tower height cannot be successfully mitigated by the mere imposition by the City of requirements or limitations in regards to screening, building material selection, lighting, color scheme, etc. The City Council finds that no methods or measures for mitigating the negative impacts have been brought forward, and approval of the tower height conditional use permit would not be in the best interests of the City of Orono or the residential neighborhood surrounding the Fire Station. Page 3 of 5 7. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit for the excess tower height as proposed would not be appropriate because: a) the proposed location of the conditional use is not in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Chapter and the purpose*: of the RR-1 B residential district in which the site is located; b) the proposed location ofthe conditional use and the proposed condition under which it would be operated or maintained would potentially be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity by potentially depreciating property values; and, c) the excess tower height would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City of Orono. 8. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed conditional use pemiit on the health, safety and w elfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of ne above findings, the Orono City Council hereby denies the request of the Cities of Long Lake and Orono for a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.75, Subd. 1 to const, jct the hose tow er at the Long Lake Fire Station at a height of 35’ above grade. The tower may be constructed at a height not exceeding 30' above grade. Page 4 of5 1 Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 11 th day of March, 2002. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this__day of ,2002 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this_day of ,2002 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 5 k4PETiNQ MAR 1 1 2002 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION on r ur uhumo DATE: March 8,2002 ITEM NO: y Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name RonMoorse jjt City Administrator's Title City Administrator Report Item Description: Payment Request-Long Lake Fire Station Attached is an invoice from BKV Group, the architect for the fire station project, in the amount of $41,637.28, for work related to preparing the final plans and specifications for the fire station. The architect has completed the final plans and specifications, and has advertised for bids. Bids ate to be received by March 19. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the request for payment in the amount of $41,637.28 to BKV Group. i va n ii BKV G R O U ^ AreHtKtura Marier 0m%)« bigliiMrtng ■•aniieii Kreos Va«*l Otitp k)& 222 North Soeond Stroo^ MltiMap«li«, MN 55 aQI Tdipha^ aLm37sa taiAdtm A12239A2a ww«r.bhv9ro«ip.com for. eoo/zoo*4 Lozsf • < 1 Invoice Invoice Nuaborl9701 bivoicoDnio: Fobtuuy2S. Qtv of Loos Lake P.O. Box 606 Loan Lake, MN 55356 Aneniioa: Midialle Mono Project: 1515.01 Chy of Long Lake Professional Services dnoueb 2/2SJ02 HCIEIVS FEB 27 m BUIlag Grasp: Contract#: 002 Tire Stetloa Pee: AmbalniiceServloi 5222.1 Altemnte: TOTAL TEB: S 2^ $225400 Contract Amoont: Percent Complete: Fee Earned: Prior Fee Billings: 5225.100.00 75.00% 5168.825.00 5133460.00 Cunent Pee Total;$35465.00 Reimbursables EgBSBtt Bond Paper bySf. CopyP^er 8 1/2 x 11 Ddivery Service Document Rtiniing Fax Vellum By SP. Reitnbuisables Totals Cberee 69640 94.80 65.95 5426.68 240 185.85 S6472.28 Invoice Total ♦♦♦$41,(37JS Sinn OKoi io kiio 8896 9i9 8S6 S0<tl 8008iL8*SSi Project; ISlS.Ot FebniwlS, Pi|6 2 of 2 Jl IA Outstanding A/R: Balanice Due: 63,682.40 $105319.68 By; DividKtoo BdUacSuMDary Cmm Print Xftt Reffiuinnil Sotvicei S3S.095.00 $130,850.00 S16S,945iX Reimbursable Expenset:$6,37228 S230S.61 $9.I77.8S Outside Services:$170.00 $2,710.00 S248a(N Other Services and Fees:sono $0.00 S0.(X Finarice Cbarfes:$0.00 $0.00 S0.0( Tazas;$0.00 $0.00 $0.01 Tottlf $41,637.28 S136J6S.61 Afed Receivables: fimiB Ol.linpavi fWrlSftlWw 41AS7ja S434l2.a0 soco saoo S040 €00/e00*d lots*turn. 9N01 iO A1I3 ZZ96 9lt ZS6 S0:»T ZOOZilZ’SSi I It •"=ETINQ m 11 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 2002 ClJrorurty^ DATE: March 8,2002 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Nane RonMoorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Additional Water Patrol Deputies on Lake Minnetonka At the February 25,2002 Council meeting, Lili McMillan, the City’s representative to the LMCD, reported on the LMCD's program of funding two additional water patrol deputies on Lake Minnetonka in 2001. She indicated the program was very successful, and that the actual cost was approximately one-half of the estimated cost. Attached is a letter from Albert Foster, LMCD Chair, regarding the proposed program for 2002. The proposal would use the unused portion of the 2001 City contributions, plus a small additional contribution amount ($620.14 for Orono) to fund the program for 2002. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the LMCD’s plan for providing two additional water patrol deputies on Lake Minnetonka in 2002, including authorizing the use of the unused portion of the City's 2001 contribution, plus an additional contribution of $620.14 to fund the program for 2002. - r ' i V J ■ i 1 ■I! ^ii~A r lh I kJ BOARD MEMBERS Bert Foster Chair. Deephaven Craig Nelson Vice Chair. Spnng Park Lili McMillan Secretary. Orono Tom Skramstad Treasurer. Shorewood Bob Ambrose Wayzata Douglas E. Babcock Tonka Bay Orv Burma Mound Tom Gilman Excelsior Paul Knudsen Minnetrista Tom Seuntiens Minnetonka Beach Herb J Suerth Woodland Katy VanHercke Minnetonka Sheldon Wert Greenwood o LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 18338 MINNETONKA BLVD • DEEPHAVEN. MINNESOTA 5539t • TELEPHONE 952 745 0789 • FAX 952 745 9085 Gregory S. Nybeck. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR March 1.2002 50*» n«qfd#d Corrttni 20*« Post Contumtf Watt* Mr. Ron Moorse City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Dear Ron: In September 2000, the LMCO with the help of some of the mayors from the LMCD member cities proposed adding two additional full-time Deputies for the 2001-2002 summer boating seasons on Lake Minnetonka, to be partially funded by the 14 cities for a two-year period. As a city that authorized a two-year voluntary payment for the project, we want to thank you for your support, report what happened, and ask for your reduced payment in 2002. Note on the attached spreadsheet, the amount we are asking the City of Orono is over 75% less than what you agreed to and budgeted for 2002. Three key points were identified that justified the need for increased presence: 1) a cultural change, less courtesy by boaters. 2) significantly reduced availability of on the water patrol time due to the increased complexity of processing violators, particularly BWI. 3) the need to prepare for the Special Deputy litigation that was being reviewed by the Minnesota Suprenre Court that may cause more need for the licensed deputy's functions. From mkJ-May to mid-October, two additional full-time Deputies were assigned to Lake Minnetonka. Feedback received oi* the project included: • Lt. Brian Johnson of the Water Patrol has reported the program as being a big success • Lt. Brian Johnson has reported that their presence contributed to a safer and better 2001 boating season. • There were no fatalities on Lake Minnetonka in 2001. • There was a reduction of personal injury accidents by more than 50%. • There was an increase in public contact but a lower citation count • The LMCD received anecdotal feedback that the higher water patrol presence resulted in more courtesy by boaters and an increase in the quality of the lake experience. The project was originally estimated at $100,000 per season with a financial breakdown of: • 50% from Hennepin County • 30% from the LMCD Member Cities • 20% from the LMCD 'Save the Lake* Fund. Voluntary payments of $24,000 were received from 13 of the 14 LMCD member cities for 2001. Although the City of Minnetonka philosophicjyiy agreed with the project they decided not to financially contribute to it because they had concerns with the LMCD funding formula. 1l)e funding formula has been addressed and the LMCD will be asking the City of Minnetonka for a voluntary contribution in 2002. The good news is that the total cost for the project in 2001 was $52,290, which was substantially below the budgeted figure of $100,000. The budget was partially based on needing significant overtime. In addition to Web Page Address: httpi/www.lmcd.org E-mail Address: lmcdOlmcd.org L LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT other savings, M worked out that significant overtime wasn't required. Breakdown of the project costs were as follows: • Hennepin County Share (50%)* $26,145 • LMCD Member Cities Share ((24%)- $12,551 (excludes City of Minnetonka) • LMCD "Save the Lake' Fund Share (26%)- $13,594 (includes City of Minnetonka which was made up by a special contribution to STL) The attached spreadsheet provides an overview of last year's voluntary contributions received from the 14 member cities showing a $30,0(X) budgeted share, the $24,000 actual payment, the $12,551 actual used, and the $11,449 overpayment. The estimate project cost for 2002 is $60,000, and the LMCD proposes the same funding formula as in 2001 ; • Hennepin County (50%) $30,000 • LMCD MemberCities (30%) $18,000 • LMCD Save the Lake Fund (20%) $12,000 The LMCD recommends that for 2002 the 13 contributing member cities direct their 2001 overpayment ($11,449) to be used against the costs for 2002 plus making a smaller additional payment of $6,551 for 2002 ($18,000 • $11,449 = $6,551). Therefore, the cities payments from their 2002 bu^t will be more than 75% less than their payments 2001 . One of the agreed upon goals of this project was that the funding formula which called for 30% contribution from the cities would be a temporary, two-year project, and that all efforts would be made to have funding come 100% from Hennepin County by 2003. We are working towards this goal. The events of Sept 11 and the potential budget shortfalls may complicate this goal. You will be updated on the future status of this project. We thank you for helping to make this program successful thus for, and welcome your comments. Please feel free to call me (952) 544-1100 or Greg Nybeck at the LMCD office if you have any questions. Sincerely, LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Albert 0. Foster LMCD Chairman End; Water Patrol Project Spreadsheet CC; Honorable Barbara Peterson- City of Orono Lili McMillan- LMCD Board- City of Orono I Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Water Patrol Project Financial Analysis For 2001 CITY 1999 Taxable 1999 Net Tax % Of Net Tax City Share City Payment City Share Spent City Share Not Market Values Capacity Capacity Budgeted 2001 For 2001 $15,687 Spent 2001 OiiiLNttiPj^uVvUii;:;;;.449.074.500 6,695.119 .1 7*39%' . .$2.2i7.uu'r ;$2;L17.U Excelsior 140.506 400 2.416.997 2 64%$791 66 $791 66 $414 14 $377 52 1 OiusiiiSotf ..:’".^'97;e66.8oo .1,520,312 1.63% :-$466.86 $466.86 ^ 4 :$as$;ro; wi. > : Minnetonka (*)4.392.492.000 84.744.523 20 00%$6.000 00 $0 00 $0 00 $0 00 Minnotonkajeach 102.674,600 1,630,361 1.75%$524.25 $52425.$274,52 •I Minnetrista 458.062,900 6.704.659 7 19%$2,155 89 $2,155 89 $1,127 90 $1,027 99 Mountir^514,586,400 7,145,622 7.68%$2,297.65 $2,297.66 $1201 62:t:"'$1,096.06. C Orono 1,018,621.300 15,777,690 16 91%.$5,073 33 $5,073 33 $2,652 67 $2,420 66 ShoraWeod 1,.■ 676,345.400 10,218,346 10.95%$3,285.72 $3,285.72 $i.7i7.73.;„;.; $1,567,99.,..ji;:: Spring Park 82.949,600 1.582,437 1 70%,$508 83 $508 83 $266 68 $242 15 Tonka Bay 166,390,100 3.001.106 3.22%$965.01 $965.01 $505.12 $459.89 Victoria 293.500.300 4.302.369 461%$1,383 43 $1.383 43 $723 17 $660 26 -T * ^ f Wayaate . •802,922,700 11,563,812 12.39% iV $3,718.36 $3,716.36 $1,943.62 .....J$1.77jl,74 V;V: Woodland 116.595,600 1.834,386 1 97%$589 85 $509 86 $309 03 $280 82 9.143.387,600 159.337.759 100%$30,000.00 $24,000.00 $12,551.17 $11,448.83 • The City of Minnetonka decided not to padiapate m 2001 and their share was made up by speaal additional private donattons to UiC Save The Lake Fund Financial Analysis For 2002 CITY 2000 Taxable 2000 Net Tax %. Of Net Tax City Share City Carryover LMCO Request Market Value Capacity Capacity Budgeted 2002 Frofn 2001 For 2002 ■h M ^ WlfcSli 1 . ' V OMPt Excelsior Minnetonka (*) Wnmtonka ^ch Minnetrista Mound Orono Shorawood Spring Park TonlM'Bay,,;.rfv-i^ Victoria jt.,-1 • . ,1' 154.541.400 107.633.700 ¥ 4.856.351.900 113.914.300 515.302.400 566.781.900 1,127.570.100 734.605.900 94.375.690 216.232.300 328.316.500 7.665,028 2.767.456 •,. 1,702,472 95.654.021 I, 810.932 7.621.456 8,010.389 17,615.497 II, 216,269 1./43.805 3,344.566 t ' Jj . -4 2 65% $477 72 *4:: 1.63% $293.88 2000% $3.60000 1.74% •?4 $312.80 7.31% $1.315 62 7.66% $1,36^76 1689% $3.04079 10.76% $1,936.50- 168% $30188 3.21% $577.34 4 66% $839 194.861.493 ^: ;.|i3.046;6b2 Woodland 127.130,600 2.008.035 1 93%__________$346 63 _______ $377 52 $233.16 $0 00 $249.73 $1,027 99 $1,096.06 $2 420 66 $1,567.99 $242 15 ,$459.89 $660 26 $i774-4 $280 82 $100 20 .4^:i-;;$6o.72..K^i&:;ffi^^ $3,600 00 $62.88 $287 62 $299.70 . $620.14 $368.51 . , $59 73 $17893 _ _ $65 81 10,108,309,500 179,074,043 100%$18,000.00 $11,448.83 $6,551.17 r/^. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MAR 1 I 2002 Cl I y Or UhUfitu DATE: March 11,2002 ITEM NO:7 Department Approval^ Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Name Tom KuehnV?y City Administrator ’s Title Finance Director /7/c^^ Report Item Description: 2002 Liability Insurance Policy and Worker Compensation Insurance Policy Premium Tabulation and Award Recommendations, with Resolution to Not Waive the Statutor>' Tort Limits for Liability Insurance Attachments: (1) Liability and Worker Compensation Insurance Premiums Tabulation (2) Worker Compensation Plan Estim.ated Premium Quotation (3) Resolution Not to Waive the Statutory Tort Limits for Liability Insurance A comparative tabulation of the 2001 and 2002 renewal insurance premiums, and the 2002 budgeted amounts is presented for your review. At this time we are recommending award of all the policies as presented. The City will continue to carry an umbrella excess liability policy of $2 million and will not waive the statutory limits established under Minnesota law. The LMCIT has specifically requested that Council adopt a resolution stipulating whether the City will or will not waive the statutoty limits under the law. . estimated cost for all policies for 2002 is $173,659 compared to $160,428 for 2001, .d $141,984 for 2000. The City will place all coverage with the LMCIT program. Worker Compensation Coverage: The renewal premium quotation for worker compensation insurance reflects a gross initial premium for 2002 of $56,992, which is adjusted by our experience modification of 1.13, increasing the premium to $64,401, and finally adjusted by a premium discount of 8.76%, resulting in a net initial premium of $58,758. This is an increase of $8,980, or 18.04% greater than the 2001 initial premium. The higher premiam is due to an increase in the City’s experience modification rating, which is affected by the number and severity of worker compensation claims in recent years. The premium increase is also affected by the increase m the total estimated payroll of $123,400, and by an overall increase in the rates applied to the worker compensation class codes. March 11,2002 2002 Insurance Policy and Worker Compensation Insurance Policy Premium Tabulation and Award Recommendations, page 2 Liability Insurance Packaye Policy and Excess Liability The package policy and excess liability policy premiums total $114,937 for 2002, compared to $110,450 for 2001, and S107,192 for 2000. The increase from 2001 to 2002 is $4,487, or 4.1%. The premium increase is comprised of property value adjustments to offset inflation and rate increases in vehicle and excess liability coverages. Staff recommends the award of the 2001 insurance coverage as presented in the attachment and the adoption of the attached resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: (1) Award of the 2002 insurance package effective January 1, 2002 to the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust for worker compensation coverage, $58,758; comprehensive municipal property and casualty package, $90,406; umbrella excess liability, $20,313; petrofiind reimbursement, $246; open meeting law, $880; boiler and machinery, $1,652; surety bonds, $977; and golf course liquor liability, $563. (2) Adopt Resolution No____, To Not Waive The Statutory Tort Limits For Liability Insurance Purposes. Wl*WINWWPDOCS\TONW0021nfT»b »pJ League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust Group Self-Insured Workers ’ Compensation Plan 145 University Avenue WSst St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 Phone (051) 215-4173 Self-Insured Workers ’ Compensation Quotation (RENEUAL of Agreement No. 0S-00036S-16) ORQNO, CITY OF 01/01/S0O2 01/01/2003 STREET CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE UATERUORKS POLICE CLERICAL MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ELECTED OR APPOINTED OFFICIALS ANIMAL CONTROL CLUB-COUNTRY/COLF ESTIMATED DEPOSIT CODE RATE PAYROLL PREMIUM 5506 “.40 359600.15822. 7520 2.41 45100.1087. 7720 3.01 1032700.31084. 8010 42 418900.1759. 9A10 1.08 484500.5233. 9A11 0.40 18200.73. 8831 2.00 36900.768. 9060 1.48 78800.1166. Manual Premium 56992. Experience Modification 1.13 Standard Premium 64401. Managed1 Care Credit 0%0. Deductible Credit ov:0. Premium 1Discount 5643. Discounted Standard Premiufl.58758. : Insurance Trust Discount 0'/.0. Net Deposit Premium 58758. The fcregoing quotation is for a deposit premium based on your estimate of payroll. Your final actual premium will be computed after an audit of payroll subsequent to the close of your agreement year and will be subject to revisions in rates, payrolls and experience modification. While you are a member of the LMCIT Workers ’ Compensation Plan, you will be eligible to participate in distributions from the Trust based upon claims experience and earnings of the Trust If you desire the coverage offered above, please complete the enclosed “Notice of Premium Options ” and return it and your check for the deposit premium (made payable to the LMCIT) to: Berkley Risk Administrators Company, LLC PO Box 581S17 Minneapolis, MN 55458-1517 LM 4410 (8/99) A RESOLUTION MAKING A SELECTION NOT TO WAIVE THE STATUTORY TORT LIMITS FOR LIABILITY INSURANCE PURPOSES WHEREAS, pursuant to previous action taken, the League of Minnesota Cities Insur ance Trust has asked the City to make an election with regards to waiving or not waiving its tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04; and WHEREAS, the choices available are as follows: to not waive the statutory tort limit, to waive the limit but to keep insurance coverage at the statutory limit, and to waive the limit and to add insurance to a new level; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono City Council does hereby elect not to waive the statutory tort liability limit established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held March 11,2002. ATTEST: Lin Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor wrwmeAwrsoc»TOM«aiUdaa A rr^, ***"PTING mar 1 I 2002REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: MarchS'i,’'i(ll&y«t;'VO ITEM NO; Department Appro^: V ^Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Name: Tom Kuehi/lo*^*^^ pY)/f City Administrator's Report Title; Finance Director M/ Item Description: Investment Report for the Year Ended December 3 1,2001 Attachment; Investment Interest Earned compared to Revenue Budgets, 2001 The unaudited statement of earned interest for the year ended December 31 ,2001 , reflects interest earned of $492,681 compared to budgeted amounts of $508,290, an unfavorable variance of $ 15,609. As a comparison, interest earned in 2000 was $582,547, and interest earned in 1999 was $497,411. These amounts exclude all HRA investment earnings. The average yield for 2001 was 5.56%, e.\cluding all URA investments held by the Trustee. This compares with an average yield of 6.29% for 2000, and 5.77% for 1999. The investment portfolio, at cost, on December 31,2001, was $9,539,145, compared to $10,233,994 on December 31,2000, and $9,787,546 on December 31,1999. On December 31,2001, the investments in trust for the HRA debt issues included $413,232 for the 1998 HRA Refunding Bonds. During 2001 the various HRA debt investments earned interest of $73,844. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Information item, no action required. Wtfii Cmmdi- KttimAh ; : 4 t ;• 11 - im I V City of Orono Interest Earned on Investments Comparison With Budget Year Ended December 31,2001 Fund Prior Year Actual Current Year Budget Actual Current Year Actual Over (Under) Budget General Fund General $106,213 $100,000 $62,329 ($37,671) Snecial Revenue Funds Park 9,178 6,000 3,642 (2,358) Improvement & Equipment Outlay 12,708 21,500 11,600 (9,900) Community Investment 125,391 135,000 109,823(a) (25.177) Drug/Felony Forfeiture 1,833 —1,609 1,609 Debt Service Funds 1982 Improvement Bonds 0 ——0 1992 Improvement Bonds 42,270 30,800 34,738 3,938 1995 Refunding Bonds (1985 Imp Bonds)4.946 550 1,631 1,081 1997 Improvement Bonds 28,381 19,000 28,016 9,016 1999 Improvement Bonds 12,054 10,740 11,277 537 2000 Improvement Bonds 1,005 —5,825 5,825 Canital Proiects Funds Municipal State Aid Construction 19,659 8,200 10,948 2,748 Permanent Improvement Revolving 37,132 40,000 41,742 1,742 1998 Sewer Construction 11,458 —6.773 2000 Sewer Construction 1,114 ..8,543 8.543 Entemrise Funds Water Operating 36,101 34,500 43,322 8,822 Sewer Operating 73,455 51,920 60.596 8,676 Sewer Operating Construction 36,369 34,780 26,928 (7,852) Golf Operating 19,781 15,300 17,013 1,713 Internal Service Fund Insurance Pool 3,499 —6,326 6,326 Total $582,547 $508,290 $492,681 ($15,609) HRA Debt Service Funds 1991 HRA Building Bonds (Trust)26,384 25,000 26,254 1,254 1998 HRA Refunding Bonds (Trust)102,953 --47,590 47,590 Grand Total All Funds $711,884 $533,290 $566^525 $33,235 The Community Investment Fund investment interest earned is under budget because of the loan to the Water Operating Fund for the Navarre water plant rehabilitation project. The interest on the loan for the year 2001 is $22,210. When the interest from the loan is added to the investment interest the total interest earned for the year is $132,033. The Water Operating loan is scheduled to be repaid in annual installments of $31,660 plus interest, ending in 2013. TO.\M.N\XSTVlWIVlal-b)rfg.lU »*PETINQ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: MAR I I 2002 Cii y wrunoivy //- Item No: // Dqyaitment Approval: Administrator Reviewed: StephanyGood Chief of Police Agenda Section: Name: Title: Item Description: Police Department Donation Exhibits:None DISCUSSION On II/2S/2000, Ofllcer Mike Carlson responded to a 91 1 call at Culver’s where a woman was in cardiac arrest. Officer Carlson and other responding officers used a defibrillator and administered cardio-pulmonary resusitation until an ambulance arrived, saving the life of Mrs. Alice Brown. On 12/25/2000, the family of Lawrence and Alice Brown of Golden Valley sent a letter of thanks and a cash donation which was designated “to be used a$ your organization sees fit, possibly for the purchase of a deribrillator”. On 2/25/02, the Police Department received a donation in the amount of $1,000 from the family of Lawrence and Alice Brown of Golden Valley, again with a note thanking Officer Carlson. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve resolution to recognize the life saving efforts of part time Police Officer Mike Carlson, to accept the donation listed above, and to express the City’s appreciation and gratitude for the donation. r. A RESOLUTION TO RECOGNIZE THE LIFESAVING EFFORTS OF OFFICER MIKE CARLSON WHEREAS, the City of Orono is supportive of all of its police officers, support staff, and supervisory staff in providing the highest quality police services; and WHEREAS, on November 25,2000, Officer Mike Carlson responded to a cardiac arrest at the Culvers Restaurant and administered Cardiac Pulmonary Resusitaiion (CPR), thereby saving a life; and WHEREAS, the family of Alice and Lawrence Brown of Golden Valley wish to extend gratitude for the expert training and successful actions of Mike Carlson and other officers of the Orono Police Department; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Orono City Council as follows: 1. The City Council hereby recognizes Officer Mike Carlson for his successful lifesaving efforts on November 25,2000. 2. The City Council hereby accept the donation on behalf of the police department and express the City’s appreciation and gratitude for the donation. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor •iw i n<L ORDINANCE NO. 216, SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING AN INTERIM MORATORIUM ON THE GRANTING OF BUILDING PERMITS, LAND SUBDIVISIONS^^ ' REZONING APPLICATIONS, CONDITIONAL OR SPECIAL USE P^Mm^ VARIANCES, OR OTHER AUTHORITY RELATING TOTHE SITIN^TQF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES IN ALL ZONING DISTRICTS IN THE CITY OF ORONO The City Council of Orono docs ordain: SECTION 1. Statement of Policy. The purpose of Orono Municipal Code Chapter 10 is to pro\ ide for the orderly development of commercial and industrial activity so as not to unreasonably conflict with the primary’ residential and agricultural character of the City. SECTION 2. Extension of Interim Moratorium. To facilitate the purpose stated in Section I the CityCouncil on November 13,2001 imposed a 120 day interim moratorium, pursuant to Minnesota □statutes Section 462.355, Subdivision 4, on the granting of building permits, land subdivisions, rezoning applications, conditional or special use permits, variances, or other authority relating to the siting of wireless telecommunication facilities and structures in all zoning districts in the City of Orono. This moratorium was imposed to allow the City time to study the issues relating to telecommunications structures and to make any necessary changes in its current ordinances. Because the City has not yet completed the study of telecommunications zoning issues, this moratorium is hereby extended an additional for 120 days to July 11,2002. SECTIONS. Telecommunications Facilities. For the purpose ofthis Section the words used herein shall have the following meaning: I.Telecommunication - the wireless transmission, emission or reception of energy or communication impulses by cable, microwave, satellite or radio signals affecting radio, telephone, telegraph or television communication or medical or industrial energy transmissions. 2. Facility - any antenna, tower, or structure associated with the transmission, emission or reception of telecommunication signals. SECTION 4. Effective Pate. This Ordinance shall be effective after the date of approval and publication. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 11 th day of March, 2002, by a vote of 4 ayes and 0 nays. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor A,i ORDINANCE NO. 159 SECOND SERIES 1 i 20Q2 CITY Or vrivrt»o AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING AN INTERIM MORATORIUM ON THE GRANTING OF BUILDING PERMITS, LAND SUBDIVISIONS, REZONING APPLICATIONS, CONDITIONAL OR SPECIAL USE PERMITS, VARIANCES OR OTHER AUTHORITY RELATING TO THE SITING OF WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES IN ALL ZONING DISTRICTS IN THE CITY OF ORONO The City Council of Orono does ordain: SECTION 1. Statement of Policy . ThepurposeofOronoMunicipalCodeChapter lOistoprovideforthe orderly development of commercial and industrial activity so as not to unreasonably conflict with the primary residential and agricultural character of the City. SECTION 2. Extension of Interim Moratorium . To facilitate the purpose stated in Section I the City Council on November 13,2001 imposeda 1 20 day interim moratorium, pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 462.3SS, Subdivision 4, on the granting ofbuilding permits, land subdivisions, rezoning applications, conditional or special use permits, variances, or other authority relating to the siting of wireless telecommunication facilities and structures in all zoning districts in the City of Orono. This moratorium was imposed to allow the City time to study the issues relating to telecommunications structures and to make any necessary changes in its current ordinances. Because the City has not yet completed the study of telecommunications zoning issues, this moratorium is hereby extended to _____________________. SECTION3. Telecommunications Facilities. ForthepurposesofthisSectionthewordsusedhereinshall have the following meaning: I. Telecommunication - the wireless transmission, emission or reception of energy or communication impulses by cable, microwave, satellite or radio signals affecting radio, telephone, telegraph or television communication or medical or industrial energy transmissions. 2. Facility - any antenna, tower, or structure associated with the transmission, emission or reception of telecommunication signals. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be effective after the date of approval and publication. Adopted by the City Council of Orono on this a vote of ___ayes and____nays. day of ., 2002 by ATTEST: Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Linda S. Vee, City Clerk REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ' mp. 2002DATE: March 7fc?002 ^ ITEM NO: Department Approval: Nine LinVee \y> Title City Clerk Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Licenses Item Description: List of Licenses for Counan Approval SPECIAL EVENT 1. Applicant: Minnesota Distance Running Association Event: Fred Kurz Memorial 10 Mile Run Race Route: Wayzata Middle School to Luce Line • approximately 4.5 miles out and back Date: Saturday, April 13,2002 Time: 8:30 a.m. • 11:30 a.m. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve/deny the above listed licenses. mm y >^-*vdj' Date of Event: Time: Saturday, April 13,2002 8;30 a.ni. - 111:30 a.m.e % Name of Pcrson(s) And/or Organiiation Sponsoring this Event: Peter Erpenbach Miimesuta Distaiice Ruiuiing Association 5701 Normandale Boulevard Edina, MN 55424 Phone:612-922-8656 Location of Event: Wayzata Middle School to Luce Line - approximately 4.5 miles out and back Type of Event: Fred Kurz Memorial 10 Mile Run (approximately 75-100 participants) The following documents are required and on file at the City Administrative Offices: • Certificate of General Liability insurance • Approval from Orono Police Department The following conditions have been placed on this event: • This special event permit is subject to immediate revocation by the Orono Police Department upon violation of any City Ordinances or identification of hazards to safety of the public. • Applicant must provide enough volunteers to direct runners/traffic at intersection roads along the race route. • Applicant must provide first aid to the runners. • Applicant to notify DNR of special event activities on the Luce Line. Approved at City Council meeting on: March 11,2002 (City Seal) Ronald J. Moorse, City Administrator 2750 Kelley Parkway. P.O. Box 66, Ciysttl Bay, MN 55323 Phone: 952-249-4600 / Fax: 952-249-4616/www.ci.oronojnn.us CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 03A)6A}2 1 36 PM Pag« 1 MARCH 2002 Ctwcfc Amt Invoic* Comment MAH 1 I 2002 Cl IY ur 10100 Primary Cash Paid Chki 073065 3/11/2002 ACTION RADIO A COMMUNICATIONS E 101-42110-402 RopairsAtaInt-Auto Equip Total ACTION RADIO A COMMUNICATIONS $114 79 12007 $11479 Tear Down #166 Paid Chk« 073066 3/11/2002 AT A T WIRELESS SERVICES E 601*49400>321 Telephone $8 87 3419397 Cell Phones E 602-49450^321 Telephone $8 87 3419397 Cell Phones E 101-41900-321 Telephone $22 18 3419397 Cell Phones ToUl AT A TWIRELPSS SERVICES $3992 Paid Chk« 073067 3/11/2002 BCA - FORENSIC SCIENCE LAB E 101-42110-437 Training & Development ___Wq.00 2025301 Intox Cert - McNally Total BCA-FORENSIC SCIENCE LAB $40 00 Paid Chk« 073068 3/11/2002 BIFFS INC. E 101-45200-415 Other Equipment Rentals $^^6 W152499 Portable - Bederwood Total BIFFS INC.$70 26 Paid Chk» 073069 3/11/2002 BOLTERMAN. MATT E 101-42400-331 Travel Expenses $16 92 022202 Mileage/Parking E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $^00 022202 Deed Printouts Total BOLTERMAN. MATT $46 92 Paid Chk# 073070 3/11/2002 BONESTROO ROSENE A ASSOC. G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $645 00 84939 Update Address Street Map G 406-20200 Accounts Payable $1,775.00 84939 Storm Wtr Mgt Plan G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $243.00 84939 Review Bridge Inspections G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $50 00 84939 Council Mtgs Dec 2001 G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $3.280 52 84939 Applications Dec 2001 Total BONESTROO ROSENE A ASSOC.$599352 Paid Chk» 073071 3/11/2002 BOYER FORD A TRUCK E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $37 05 366408 Parts #425 E 101 -43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories J^57 367800 Repair Parts #425 Total BOYER FORD A TRUCK $93.62 Paid Chk# 073072 3 11/2002 BUDGET PRINTING E 601-49400-322 Postage $677 19782 Shipping-Wtr Samples E 101 -41900-201 Office supplies $17.59 19853 Color Copies Total BUDGET PRINTING $24.36 Paid Chk# 073073 3/11/2002 CHAMPION AUTO STORES E 101 -43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $37.75 D130248 Marker Lights ToUl CHAMPION AUTO STORES $37.75 Paid Chk# 073074 3/11/2002 CITY OF MAPLE GROVE E 101-42110-437 Training & Development $750 00 7626 Range Rental 2/15/02 Total CITY OF MAPLE GROVE $750.00 Paid ChK« 073075 3/t 1/2002 C!TY OF ORONO E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $10.45 3/11/02 Petty Cash Reimb E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $12.27 3/11/02 Petty Cash Reimb E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $20.16 3/11/02 Petty Cash Reimb E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $15 96 3/11/02 Petty C»h Reimb E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $10 39 3/11/02 Petty Cash Reimb CITY OF ORONO 03A)S/021:36PM Page 2 *Check Detail Register® MARCH 2002 Check Amt Invoice Comment E 101-41900-322 Postage $0 34 3/11/02 Petty Cash Reimb E 101-41900-322 Postage $5 29 3/11/02 Petty Cash Reimb E 101 -41300*409 Other Miscellaneous Charges $4 00 3/11/02 Petty Cash Reimb E 101-41300-489 Other Miscellaneous Charges $12.^ 3/11/02 Petty Cash Reimb Total CITY OF ORONO $91 29 Paid Chk* 073076 3/11/2002 CITY Of ORONO PETTY CASH E 101-42110-322 Postage $3 60 3/11/02 Police Petty Cash E 101-42110-322 Postage $4.17 3/11/02 Police Petty Cash E 101-42110-437 Training A Development $8 77 3/11/02 Police Petty Cash Total CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH $16.54 Paid Chk* 073077 3/11/2002 OCA • WIRE ONLY G 101-21719 DCA/Spending Accounts $989 33 3/5/02 Spending AccU 3/5/02 G 101-21719 OCA/Spending Accounts $1,184^ 3/6/02 Final-2001 Spending Accts Total DCA-WIRE ONLY $2.17369 Paid Chk# 073078 3/11/2002 OEPT OF ADM • INTERTECH GROUP E 101-41900-321 Telephone $137 24 W02010659 Phone Service 1/2002 E 101-42110-321 Telephone $58 83 W02010659 Phone Service 1/2002 Total DEPT OF ADM • INTERTECH GROUP $196 07 Paid Chk# 073079 3/11/2002 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS E 601-49400-201 Office supplies $20 77 25580 Plan Copies E 602-49450-201 Office supplies $2077 25580 Plan Copies ToUl ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS $41.54 Paid Chk# 073060 3/11 /2002 ESS BROTHERS A SONS E 601-49400-227 Utiitty System Maint Supplies $15 M EE 1070 Water Valve Cover ToUl ESS BROTHERS A SONS $1598 Paid Chk# 073081 3/11/2002 EXTENDO BED COMPANY. INC E 101 -42110-550 Automotive Equipment $1.688 00 22193 Extendable Bed-Expedition ToUl EXTENDO BED COMPANY, INC $1.888 00 Paid Chk# 073062 3/11/2002 FEDEX E 101-41900-322 Postage $27 63 4-101-80111 Delivery to Flint ToUl FEDEX $27 83 Paid Chk# 073083 3/11/2002 OAK SERVICES E 101-43000-226 Clothing & personal equipment $57.23 132402 Uniforms E 602-49450-226 Clothing A personal equipment $24 54 132402 Uniforms E 613-49830-226 Clothing A personal equipment $7.72 132403 Uniform - StefTenhagen E 601 -49400-226 Clothing A personal equipment $14 08 132404 Uniform - Rathbun E 101-41900-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds $10386 132405 Mat Service - PW E 101-41900-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds $49 34 132406 Mat Service - CH E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds $107.05 132407 Mat Service - PD E 101-41900-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grour>ds $49.34 132408 Mat Service • CC E 602-49450-226 Clothing A personal equipment $25.90 139422 Uniforms E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $50.59 139422 Shop Towels E 101-43000-226 Clothing & personal equipment $60 43 139422 Uniforms E 613-49830-226 Clothing & personal equipment $7.72 139423 Uniform • Stefitnhagen E 601 -49400-226 Clothing & personal equipment $14.08 139424 Uniform • Rathbun E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $41.01 697340 Shop Towels E 602-49450-226 Clothing & personal equipment $58.75 897340 Uniforms E 101-43000-226 Clothing & personal equipment $137.07 897340 Uniforms h CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 03/08/02 1:36 PM Pages MARCH 2002 ....................Check Amt Invoice Comment E 613-49630-226 Clothing A personal equipment $7.72 897341 Uniform • Steffenhagen E 601-49400-226 Clothing A personal equipment $1406 897342 Uniform • Rathbun ToUl GSKSERVICES $830.51 Paid Chk# 073085 3/11/2002 GARY*S DIESEL SERVICE INC. E 101-43000-489Other Miscellaneous Charges $606 30 54667 2002 DOT Inspections ToUl GARY S DIESEL SERVICE INC.$606 30 Paid Chkf 073066 3/11/2C02 GENUINE PARTS CO. E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $7 23 2549647 Circuit Tester E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $14 90 679626 Hal Bulb E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessones $2331 679683 Grommet. Oil Filter E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessones $1765 680310 Bulb. Gojo E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $531 680459 Shop supplies E 101-43000-222 Vehicle Equipment A Parts $851 680467 Supplies E 101-43000-222 Vehicle Equipment A Parts $4969 680474 Fitting. Hose E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $14 06 680512 Fuses E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $23 41 680540 Battery E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $1 89 680839 Supplies E 101-43000-222 Vehicle Equipment A Parts $1265 681418 Supplies E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $6 26 681433 Shop Supplies E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $3253 681627 Shop Supplies E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $2342 681954 Drill Bit E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessones $3 93 682141 Lube Tout GENUINE PARTS CO.$24475 r i ■ . i Paid Chki 073068 3/11 /2002 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE E 101-42400-437 Training & Development $250 00 J Berg ToUl GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE $250 00 Planning Workshops-Beig Paid Chk# 073089 3/11/2002 H & L MESABI E 101 -43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessones Tout HSLMESABI $391 68 53028 $39168 Plow Cutting Edges Paid Chk# 073090 3/11 /2002 HAMEL BUILDING CENTER E 101-45200-223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies ToUl HAMEL BUILDING CENTER $404 92 86444 $404 92 Navarre Park-Sat Enclosure Paid Chk# 073091 3/11/2002 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF G 101-20200 Accounts Payable G 101-20200 Accounts Payable G 101-20200 Accounts Payable G 101-20200 Accounts Payable G 101-20200 Accounts Payable ToUl HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF $530 71 $442 35 $361 17 $294 90 $14745 $1,776.58 Aug 2001 July 2001 May 2001 Oct 2001 Sept 2001 Booking Fees 8/01 Booking Fees 7/01 Booking Fees 5/0 ^ Booking Fees 10/01 Booking Fees 9/01 Paid Chk# 073092 3/11/2002 HENNEPIN COUNTY TR-TAX PYR SRV E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $82 95 1/14/02 01 Miaoffim. 02 Hard Copy ToUl HENNEPIN COUNTY TR-TAX PYR SRV $82.95 Paid Chk# 073093 3/11/2002 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN E 101-41600-309 Jail Charges $620.00 411 Room A Board • Jan 2002 ToUl HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN $620.00 Paid Chk# 073094 3/11/2002 JOHNSON. RICK E 101-42110489 Other Miscellaneous Charges $165.00 3/4A)2 Deer Removal 1 A 2/2002 CITY OF ORONO 03/08/02 1:36 PM Page 4 *Check Detail Register® MARCH 2002 Check Amt Invoice Comment Total JOHNSON. RICK $165 00 Paid Chk# 073095 3/11/2002 KATH FUEL OIL G 101-20200 Accounts Payable Total KATH FUEL OIL $53 M 122838 $5334 Synthetic Blend Paid Chk# 073096 3/11/2002 KENNETH N. POTTS. PA E 101-41600-306 Legal-Prosecution Total KENNETH N. POTTS. PA $2,391 66 2/2002 $2,391 66 Prosecutions - 2/2002 Paid Chk# 073097 3/11 /2002 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES E 101-41300-208 Books & Penodicals Total LEAGUE OF MN CITIES $319^39 2002 $31939 2002 Directory of MN Officials Paid Chk# 073098 3/11 /2002 LESKINEN. DENISE M. E 101-41300-437 Training & Development Total LESKINEN. DENISE M. $1943 3/3/02 Parking, Mileage-Muniripals $1943 Paid Chk# 073099 3/11 /2002 LMCIT-BERKLEY ADMIN E 703-49960-361 General Liability Ins E 613-49830-369 Dram Shop Insurance E 703-49960-362 Umbrella Liability Ins E 703-49960-361 General Liability Ins E 703-49960-361 General Liability Ins Total LMCIT-BERKLEY ADMIN $23.258 75 9015 $563 00 9016 $20.213 00 9017 $246 00 9018 $880 00 9019 $45.16075 Comp Munic Cov Pymnt #1 Dram Shop ins Excess Liability Ins Petrofund Ins Open Meeting Law Ins Paid Chk# 073100 3/11 /2002 LOGIS E 101-41900-401 E 101-42110-401 E 101-42110-310 E 101-41900-401 E 101-42110-401 E 101-42110-310 E 101-41900-329 E 101-42110-310 E 101-41900-311 E 101-42110-329 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip Repairs/Maint-Office Equip LOGIS-Applications Repairs/Maint-Office Equip Repairs/Maint-Office Equip LOGIS-Applications Other Communications LOGIS-Applications Data Processing Communication Other Communications Total LOGIS $650 00 $650 00 S2.38200 $85 00 $85 00 $18977 $183 00 $1.635 00 $30 00 $183 00 $6.072 77 21493 21493 21531 21548 21548 21578 21609 21609 21609 21609 2002 Network Wellness 2002 Network Wellness 2002 System Development LH3000 Server Set Up LH3000 Server Set Up 2002 Reflections Lie Internet 1/02 Police Records 1/02 Henn Cty Connection Internet 1/02 Paid Chk# 073101 3/11 /2002 LONG LAKE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $110 00 Mbrship Total LONG LAKE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE $110 00 2002 Chamber Membership Paid Chk# 073102 3/11/2002 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories Total MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT $30 79 $30.79 2021990 Handle Paid Chk# 073103 3/11/2002 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKIA CO E 101-41900-301 Auditing and Acet'g Services $12.00 8374 E 101-41900-301 Auditing and Acet’g Services $2,900.00 8374 Total MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI A CO Audit Reimb Exp Audit RFP#1 $2.91200 Paid Chk# 073104 3/11/2002 MCLEOD USA - PHONE BILLS E 602-49450-321 Telephone $39.87 1940897 E 601-49400-321 Telephone Total MCLEOD USA-PHONE BILLS $47.82 1940897 Phone Service Phone Service $87.69 CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register© 03/08/02 1:36 PM Pages MARCI 2002 Invoice Comment Paid:hW^73105^3niS00^lieTCOuBciLE!wi^^ R 101-39610 Miscellaneous Revenue ($624.00) 02/2002 G 101-20609 SAC Charges due to MWCC Total MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER $62,400 00 02/2002 $61.776 00 Adm Fee - 2/2002 Sac Charges - 2/2002 PaidChk# 073106 3/11/2002 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN CO m:I>ANY E 101-43000-415 Other Equipment Rentals $28.63 RI02020911 Acetylene. Oxygen E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories Tout MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY $14 53 RI02020912 $4316 Medical Oxygen Paid Chk# 073107 3/11/2002 MUNICAPAL RISK SERVICES LTD E 101-430(H>-433 Memberships A Subscriptions $44.95 ToUl MUNICAPAL RISK SERVICES LTD Risk and Roads $44 95 PaidChk# 073108 3/11/2002 NETLITINDISTRIBUTORS E 101-41900-201 Office supplies Total NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS $194^0 13241 $194 00 Cozy Cups Paid Chk# 073109 3/11/2002 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS E 101-42110-321 Telephone 2819346-4 Total NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS $763 56 Police Cell Phones Paid Chk# 073110 3/11/2002 NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE E 101-42110-437 Training A Development $100.00 3508 E 101-42110-437 Training A Development E 101-42110-437 Training A Development Total NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE $100 00 3509 $100 00 3510 $300 00 Standard Investigator-J Johnso Standard tnvestigator-McNichol Standard lnvestigp*or-Wittke Paid Chk# 073111 3/11/2002 O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $59 90 1/28/02 G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $^99 50 12/29/01 Total O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR $359 40 10 Car Wash Tickets 50 Car Wash Tickets Paid Chk# 073112 3/11/2002 OBERAIGNER, SCOTT E 602-49450-222 Vehicle Equipment A Parts Total OBERAIGNER, SCOTT $61.24 3/01/02 $61 24 Valves - Vactor Truck Paid Chk# 073113 3/11/2002 OFFICE DEPOT E 101-42110-121 PERA E 101-419(X)-201 Office supplies E 101-42110-201 Office supplies E 101-41900-201 Office supplies E 101-42110-201 Office supplies E 101 -42110-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories ToUl OFFICE DEPOT $4392 $179.74 $147.07 $7 48 $27 91 $28.10 141976148 141976148 141976148 141976148 152043601 152043601 Cork Board Office Supplies Office Supplies Office Supplies Office Supplies Cat 5 Cable $434 22 Paid Chk# 073114 3/11/2002 ONE STOP AUTO SERVICE E 101 -42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip E 101 -42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repairs#yiaint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $2231 $821.49 $215.83 $355 56 $788.74 $37.12 $15.00 $35.53 $283.91 10126 10127 10128 10131 10176 10188 10195 10196 10202 Replace Headlight #183 Intake Manifold #184 Rear Brakes #184 Fmt Brakes. Bearing #187 Intake Manifold #187 Oil Change #183 Change Tka #190 ON Change #190 Spark Plugs. Bools #183 CITY OF ORONO 03A)8A)2 1:36 PM Pag* 6 *Check Detail Register® MARCH 2002 Check Amt Invoice Comment E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repaira/Maint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip E 101 -42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip Tout ONE STOP AUTO SERVICE $37.13 10216 $75 03 10223 $159.70 10230 $198 29 10249 $35.52 10250 $145 23 10266 $3.22639 Oil Change, lute #187 Install Lock Timer #189 Hub, Diagnostics #184 Battery. Align t190 OU Change #191 Scan. Plugs #188 Paid Chk« 073116 3/11/2002 E 613-49830-340 General Advertising Total ORONO BASEBALL BOOSTERS ORONO BASEBALL BOOSTERS $100 ^ AdvefUsmenl $100 00 1/4 Page Ad-BbaD Program Paid Chk# 073117 3/11/2002 PIONEER E 101-41900-352 Printing & Publishing E 101-42400-340 General Advertising E 101-42400-340 General Advertising Total PIONEER $55 00 909 $104 00 920 $37.81 922 $196 81 2002 Materials/Equip Bid Land Use Applications Applications Paid Chk# 073118 3/11/2002 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS E 101-41900-401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip $160 33 135671 Totel PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS $160 33 Service Call - Adm Fax Paid ChK» 073119 3/11/2002 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE G 101-21710 Life Insurance $591 45 3/2002 G 101-21710 Life Insurance $91 65 3/2002 G 101-15998 Non-Employee Health Ins $JL65 3/2002 Total PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE $684 75 Supplimental Life 3/2002 Basic Life - 3/2002 COBRA Life 3/2002 Paid Chk# 073120 3/11/2002 QWEST E 601 -49400-321 Telephone ToUl QWEST $103 00 612E440016 $103 00 Comm Line-WT to PW Paid Chk# 073121 3/11/2002 RELIANT ENERGY E 602-49450-381 Gas & Electric E 101-42110-381 Gas&Electnc E 101-41900-381 Gas & Electric E 601-49400-381 Gas&Electnc E 101-41900-381 Gas & Electric Total RELIANT ENERGY $36 26 $296 50 $362 37 $699 89 $1,105 23 $2.5^ 25 060006750600 Gas Service 060006750600 Gas Service 060006750600 Gas Service 060006750600 Gas Service 060006750600 Gas Service 3/11/2002 RICKS SUPERVALUEPaid Chk# 073122 E 101-42110-439 Meeting Expenses Tout RICKS SUPERVALUE $25 00 1/11/02 Police Meeting $2500 Paid Chk# 073123 3/11/2002 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES E 101-41800-490 Contnbutions to Civic Org's $3,907 50 3/4/02 Total SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 1st Qtr 2002 Sr Services $3,907.50 Paid Chk# 073124 3/11/2002 STANDARD SPRING E 602-49450-403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip Total STANDARD SPRING $742.64 92137 Spnngs - #425 $74264 Paid Chk# 073125 3/11/2002 STREICHERS E 406-48720-226 Clothing & personal equipment E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 101-42110-228 Training Supplies E101-42110-226 Clothing A personal equ^ent $11.523 30 268327 1 $38.79 272201 1 $19.12 274531.1 ($6.39) 274536.1 Berretta Duty Handguns Solenoid - Gun Lock Cleanir>g Suppfies CredN CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 03A)8A)2 1 36 PM Page? MARCH 2002 Check Amt In# oice Comment E 101-42110-226 E 101-42110-221 E 101-42110-226 E 601-49400-221 E 101-42110-226 E 101-42110-226 E 101-42110-226 E 101-42110-101 Clothing & personal oquipnf>ent Equipment Parts A Accessories Clothing A personal equipment Equipment Parts A Accessories Clothing A personal equipment Clothing A personal equipment Clothing A personal equipment Full-Time Employees Regular ToUl STREICHERS $17995 $44.70 $37275 $56 75 $38 34 $38 34 $21 25 $21.25 275008 1 275042.1 275827.1 276301 1 277893 1 277893 1 277896 1 277896 1 Ballistic Vest Carrier Gun Lock timer Duty Ammo Lamp Module. Bulb Duty Ammo Duty Ammo Holster-B Johnson Belt Loop-B Johnson $12,348 15 Paid Chk# 073126 3/11/2002 TALLEN AND BAERTSCHI E 101-41600-306 Legal-Prosecution ToUl TALLEN AND BAERTSCHI $129.60 $12960 2/2002 Prosecutions - 2/2002 Paid ChK# 073127 3/11/2002 TOLL GAS A WELDING SUPPLY E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $149.13 161991 Welding Supplies ToUl TOLL GAS A WELDING SUPPLY S149 13 Paid Chk# 073128 3/11/2002 TRACY TRIPP FUELS E 101-43000-212 Motor Fuels A Lubricants $592.16 88245 2188 Gals Unleaded G 101-14101 Gasoline Inventory $2,317 09 88245 2188 Gals Unleaded Tout TRACY TRIPP FUELS $2,90925 Paid Chk# 073129 3/11/2002 UNITED RENTALS E 601-49400-415 Other Equipment Rentals S52.72 342550 Barricades E 602-49450-415 Other Equipment Rentals S52 72 342550 Barricades ToUl UNITED RENTALS $105 44 Paid Chk# 073130 3/11/2002 US BANK - MLWKEE E 312-47000-620 Fiscal Agent's Fees $750 00 1028474 Agent Fee - 98 HRA Bond ToUl US BANK - MLWKEE $750 00 Paid Chk# 073131 3/11/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS E 601 -49400-321 Telephone $14 16 10034585141 Utility Cell Phone E 602-49450-321 Telephone $14.16 10034585141 Utility Cell Phone ToUl VERIZON WIRELESS $2832 PaidChM 073132 3/11/2002 VERMEER OF MINNESOTA E 101.43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $103 83 120676 Bearings E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $23447 120847 Bearings ToUl VERMEER OF MINNESOTA $338 30 PaidChk# 073133 3/11/2002 VILLAGE CHEVROLET E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories ToUl VILLAGE CHEVROLET $124 63 359159 Repair Parts #712 $12463 PaKlChk# C73134 3/11/2002 WESTONKA GLASS SERVICE E 613-49830-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds ToUl WESTONKA GLASS SERVICE $38 95 511464 Replace Storm Window-GC $38 95 Paid Chk# 073135 3/11/2002 WIDMER INC E 601 -49400-405 Repairs/Maint-Watermains/plant ToUl WIDMER INC $826.00 5131 Main Break - HWY 12/OCB $826 00 Paid Chk# 073136 3/11/2002 WINTERNHEIMER, AUSSA € 101-41300-319 Other Professional Services $185 00 27 Council Minutet-2/2SA)2 CITY OF ORONO 03/08/02 1:36 PM Pages *Check Detail Register® MARCH Chech Amt twvoice Commsfil TolM WINTERNHEIMER.ALI88A $185 00 PaidChMP 073137 3/11/2002 VVRIOHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC E 101-43000-381 Gas A Electric E 602-49450-381 Gas A Electric Total WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC $24.15 3113009200 $29.68 3113009200 Electrical Service Electrical Service $53 83 Paid Chk# 073138 3/11/2002 XCEL ENERGY E 101-43000-386 E 601-49400-381 E 101-42110-381 E 101-45200-381 E 101-43000-381 E 613-49830-381 E 101-42110-381 E 101-41900-381 E 602-49450-381 Street lighting Gas A Electric Gas A Electric Gas A Electric Gas A Electric Gas A Electric Gas A Electric Gas A Electric Gas A Electric Total XCEL ENERGY $1,289.55 $2,329.75 $9.42 $15.52 $1922 $17211 $463.94 $567.04 $1,164.97 002130110006 Street Lighting-2/2002 Allocation Electrical Service Electrical Service Electrical Service Electrical Service Electrical Service Electrical Service Electrical Service Electrical Service Allocation Allocation Alocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation $6,031.52 10100 PrhnaryCash $173.833 91 1 CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® OytmiiMPU Pagel FEBRUARY 2002 Check AmC Comment 10100 PrlmmyCeeh ^aid Chk# 062797 2/5/2002 INTL CONF. OF BLDO OFFICIALS E 101-42400441 Licenses A Taxes E 101-42400441 LloenaM&Tans Total INTLCONF.OFBLDOOFFICIALS SSO.OO Davit SSO OO Davis $10000 RaoartHy UMC-Oavit Reoartify UBC-Davit Paid Chkf 062790 2/19/2002 WESTERN HENN CO PIONEER ASSOC E 10143290400 S(wd«l Projects. Contingancy Total WESTERN HENN CO PIONEER ASSOC $90 00 Books $90 00 Orono History Books Paid Chk# 062799 2/20/2002 OCA • WIRE ONLY G 101-21719 DCA/Spending Accounts Total DCA-W1REONLY $57864 2/11/02 $578 64 ee A A f Spending Acoounts-2/11/02 E 101-42110^37 Training A Development Total NORTH MEMORIAL CUNK^OCC HEAL ($200.00) 133 Void Check 72061 ($200 00) 10100 Primary Cash $56864 I CITY OF ORONO check register 03A)S/02 9:20AM Pagel Pay Paclod Chack Numbaf Employoa Nam# 050852 DODGE. RACHEL M. 5 050853 JOHNSON. MARY ANN 5 050854 LESKINEN. DENISE M. 5 050855 MOORSE. RONALD J 5 050856 VEE. LINDAS. 5 050857 KUEHN. THOMAS M. 5 050858 OLSON. RONALD J 5 050859 PETTIT. SANDRA K. 5 050860 ANDERSON. BRUCE L. 5 050861 BOBZIEN. SUE A 5 050862 BORIS. SCOTT W 5 050863 BUDIG. STACIE M. 5 050864 CARLSON. MICHAEL B. 5 050865 CORNICK. JAMES L 5 050866 DEMBOUSKI. JAY C. 5 050867 ERICKSON. KURT R 5 050868 FARNIOK. CORREY L 5 050869 FISCHENICH. DAN T 5 050870 FISCHER. CHRISTOPHER iC 5 050871 GOOD. STEPHANY R. 5 050872 HENDRICKS. RON/UDJ. 5 050873 JOHNSON. BRADLEY P. 5 050874 JOHNSON. JEFFREY 5 050875 MADSON. ADRIENNE M. 5 050876 MCNALLY. STEVEN A. 5 050877 MCNICHOLS. DAVID L 5 050878 MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES 5 050879 PERSELL. WILLIAM R 5 050880 SCHOENHOFF. JOHN B 5 050881 TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F 5 05088? TOMCZYK.MARKW. 5 050883 WITTKE. ANTHONY A. 5 050884 ARNESON. JOSHUA A. 5 050885 LEE. JOSEPH P 5 050886 BOLTERMAN. MATTHEW A 5 050887 BOTTENBERG. WENDY C. 5 050688 DAVIS. MARC L. 5 050689 GAFFRON. MICHAEL P. 5 050890 GAPPA.GREGORYA. 5 050891 MEYER. WILLIAM C. 5 050892 OMAN. LYLE E 5 050893 WEINBERGER. PAUL E. 5 050894 BRINKHAUS. JOHN F. 5 050895 DEBAERE. DONALD L 5 050896 GREGORY. JAMES D. S 050897 HANSEN. STE^/EN 5 050898 OBERAIGNER. SCOTT G. 5 050899 OBRIEN. RANDY L 5 050900 PALMER. GREGORY A. 5 050901 RATHBUN. BARRY J. 6 050902 SKREEN. DALE 8. 5 050903 STEFFENHAGEN. RONALD S Chack Chack Amount Data Chack Status S993 69 3/6/02 Outstanding $625 71 3/6A)2 Outstanding $782 59 3/6A)2 Outstanding $18 80 3/6/02 Outstanding $1,351.11 3/6A)2 Outstanding $1.042.31 3/6/02 Outstanding $78.89 3/6/02 Outstanding $417 55 3/6/02 Outstanding $415 85 3/6/02 Outstanding $736 67 3/6A)2 Outstanding $1.191 57 3/6/02 Outstanding $779.25 3/6/02 Outstanding $393.14 3/6/02 Outstanding $1.535 49 3/6A)2 Outstanding $1.481 16 3/6/02 Outstanding $1,603 79 3/6/02 Outstanding $1,657 57 3/6/02 Outstanding $ 1.426 11 3/6/02 Outstanding $92.57 3/6/02 Outstanding $2,040.04 3/6A)2 Outstanding $1.167 35 3/6/02 Outstanding $1.467.10 3/6/02 Outstanding $1.056 76 3/6/02 Outstanding $608 59 3/6/02 Outstanding $1.356 98 3/6/02 Outstanding $579 98 3/6A)2 Outstanding $1.742 61 ZfSn)2 Outstanding $442 82 3/6/02 Outstanding $1.442 51 3/6/02 Outstanding $289 90 3/6/02 Outstanding $1.403.11 3/6/02 Outstanding $1.275.53 3/6/02 Outstanding $665 88 3/6/02 OutsUndtng $296 48 3/6A)2 OuUtanding $1.095 40 3/6/02 Outstanding $1.122 84 3/6/02 Outstanding $1,216.19 3/6/02 Outstanding $1.353 01 3/6A)2 Outstanding $1.771 33 3/6/02 Outstanding $581.62 3/6/02 Outstanding $153.98 3/6/02 Outstanding $1.446.73 3/6A)2 OuUUnding $1.319 70 3/6/02 Outstanding $1.004.23 3/6/02 Outstanding $858.30 3/6/02 Outstanding $1.089.03 W02 Outstanding $719.82 2W02 Outstandmg II J903.82 3/6/02 Oidstan<ing $969.64 3/6/02 Outstanding $1,289.65 3/6/02 Outstanding $1,190.68 3/6/02 Outstanding II .349.82 3/6/02 Outstanding CITY OF ORONO check register 03«5«29:20AM P9Qb2 ClMCfc Numtef EmpkiyM Nam« Pty PtHod Chtcli Amount Chocli Date Chock Status $51,960.85