Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
02-25-2002 Council Packet
CoiC/X^r FEB 2 5 2002 AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, FEBRUARY ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (•) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one niution by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet. ROLL CALL CONSENT AGENDA I. Approve/Amend APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 2. Regular Council Meeting of February 11,2002 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS • Pauline Bouchard, Representative PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Sandy Smith, Representative LMCD REPORT - Lili McMillan PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 3. #01-2699 Jay and Kendall Nygard. 1386 Rest Point Road - Variances - Resolution * 4. #01-2706 Richard Stark, 81 5 Partenwood Road - Variance Review - Resolution * 5. #01-2709 Richard and Anne Shull - 2285 French Creek Road - Variance - Resolution * 6. #01-2730 Ace Properties. 3375 Crystal Bay Road - Variances - Resolution 7. #02-2746 Mark Finney, 3210 North Shore Drive - Variances * 8. #02-2747 Tonka Ventures, 3749 Livingston Avenue - Easement Vacation - Resolution 9. #02-2749 Thomas P. Egan, 350,360,370 Big Island - Vacation * 10. #02-2750 Edward and Michelle Winer, 2010 Shoreline Drive - Variance - Resolution * 11. #01-275 1 Mark Welsh. 3625 North Shore Drive - Variances - Resolution * 12. #02-2754 Matthew and Kathy Dolliff, 2680 Pheasant Road - Variance - Resolution 13. #02-2755 Long Lake Fire Station - City ofOrono, 340 Willow Drive North - Class III Subdivision, Variance and Conditional Use Permit MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR'S REPORT 14. Accept Donation of Storage Shed 1 5. Bid Award - 2002 Materials and Equipment 16. Request for Final Payment - Navarre Park Project 17. Support of Mound Skate Park - Resolution '1. AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY. FEBRUARY 25,2002,7:00 P.M, ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA CITY ADMINISTRATOR ’S REPORT 18. Accept Donations for Parks 19. Pay Request and Change Order - Long 1 ake Fire Station 20. Pay Requests - Long Lake Fire Station 21. Request for Authorization to Dispose of Forfeited Vehicle 22. Schedule Volunteer Commission Interviews 23. City Open House Plans 24. Schedule Work Sessions CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 25. LICENSES One Day Gambling - Resolution Special Events * 26. BILLS UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 2002 02/25 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 03/04 - Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p.m. 03/1 1 -Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 03/18 - Planning Commission, 6:30 p.m. 03/25 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 04/01 -Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p.m. 04/08 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 04/15 - Planning Commission, 6:30 p.m. 04/22 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 04/24 - Board of Review, Wednesday, 7:00 p.m. . ^ i>Wi ^ * » I- 'i U i \ 'i ’I i Public A ttendance Meeting Date Jo •I ' ^ Council □ Planning Commission □ Park Commission □ Other Please hll out the information requested BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME (please print) ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER I. Z. /-O/V Ir / 2. ^ J^' 0 y 2 to 4. i\J<rA \'2J X. f o I•»)^ ZX^. /c 4. )l\i^Lliii j \ 70i 0LiT)r jO 7. 8. ^<rJ>C- V) / /V / ^ / If c^r y'*y /••/I A tvA sJc"! 9. 10.. 11. 12.. 13.. 14. 15. X:\Dtu\AMiMntH* iapfwturwiM - OMi\raiiMmnnuc.ATr s ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 11,2002 ------- i tea CO 2i,ui CtTV OF onowo ROLL The Council met on the above-mentioned dale witlt tlie following members present: Mayor Barbara Peterson, Council Members Jim White, and Jay Nygard. Representing staff were City Attorney Tom Barrett, Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, Public Services Director Greg Gappa, and Recorder Alissa Wintemheimer. Council Members Richard Flint and Bob Sansevere, City Administrator Ron Moorse, and Planning Director Michael Ganron were absent. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approve/Amend Items 5,7,9,11,12,14,15, and 17 were added to the Consent Agenda. White moved, and Nygard seconded, to approve the consent agenda as amended. Vote; Ayes 3, Nays 0. PRESENTATION 2. Laurie Fitz, Westonka Community Action Network (WeCAN) Ms. Fitz stated that WeCAN serves western Orono families by enhancing family stability and independence. They deal with people who often have hidden needs through ser\ ices such as: Meals on Wheels, Job Placement Program, Family Support Services, Emergency Assistance, Health Advocacy, Food and Nutrition Education, Energy Assistance, Community Food Shelf, Low Cost Clothing Providers, Economic Assistance, and Family and Individual Counseling. They also work with the Orono Healthy Community Collaborative. WeCAN started as a partnership of churches and then grew into a volunteer organization including businesses, churches, and individuals. The Council agreed they were already very familiar with WeCAN. Mayor Peterson stated she would be hearing from the Council. APPROVAL OF MINUTES kZ ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY II, 2002 *3. Regular Council Meeting of January 28,2002 White moved, and Nygard seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of January 28,2002. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS—SHEROKEEILSE, REPRESENTATIVE Use stated that they were moving along on Hackberry Park and wilt probably spend the March meeting looking over plans. The Commission is looking forward to the joint meeting with the City Council. A neighbor to Seven Nations and the Lutheran Aid Association donated three park benches and they were installed. She asked if the Sohn property had been surveyed. Use stated they want to use the property for ice rinks, and possibly cement over one for use as a roller rink in warm months. Mound is planning a skate park that could be functional as early as this spring. Use stated the Park Commission had moved to ask the Council for a resolution stating they support the Mound skate park. Mound requires in-kind donations and S30,000 to finish the project. The resolution of support would then be published with a request for citizens to volunteer time or make donations to the skate park project. She emphasized the Commission was not requesting a financial contribution, only a show of support. Nygard asked Acting City Administrator Greg Gappa to have a resolution drafted for the next meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS—JAN BERG, REPRESENTATIVE None. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 4. #01-2706 Richard Stark—880 Partenwood Road—Changes to Approved Plan Ron Lauer, the contractor, and Richard and Jane Stark were present. Bottenberg stated the Starks’ plans had changed in that the applicants decided not to construct the addition on the east side of the residence, but instead are proposing slightly larger decks and changing one of the decks into a screened porch both are on the lakeside ■ 4.^ »■■■---------------- ■. J ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY II, 2002 4. U01~2706 Richard Stark—880 Partenwood Road—Changes to Approved Plan- Continued of the residence. The lot coverage by structures was approved at 3,410 s.f. (7.7%). The coverage w'ill decrease by 148 s.f. with the new proposal, which meets the approved hardcover in the 0-75 ’ setback. The location of the structure is what changes. The proposal incorporates more structure in the 0 - 75’ setback zone on the lakeside of the residence, rather than on the side of the residence further from the lake. The house sits approximately 40' from the lake, is a single story, the additions would not affect the neighbors, and the house and garage were built in the 0 - 75’ setback before current zoning laws. Mayor Peterson stated she would like the issue referred back to the Planning Commission because it is a matter of hardcover in the 0-75 ’ setback. Nygard agreed it should return to the Planp'ng Commission. Mr. Stark stated they bought the property with the addition plan in place. The current plan reduces hardcover and mass from the original plan. He stated that delaying the start would create a hardship because of the timing of construction. Mr. Lauer stated that the construction would occur over existing hardcover. Mayor Peterson stated she felt strongly about the matter returning to the Planning Commission. Mr. Stark stated that the variance would not change, they simply wanted to move the structure from one place to another. Mayor Peterson replied there may be no change in numbers, but she was unwilling to set a precedent by approving the request. Nygard asked if a two-week delay would make that big of a difference. Mr. Lauer stated it would set the construction back by 2 months because of road crews along the street. He stated they were ready to start construction as soon as they were granted approval. White stated he supported the other Council members. Mayor Peterson moved, and White seconded, to refer the application back to the Planning Commission. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. *5. #01-2709 Rich and Anne Shull—^2285 French Creek Road—Changes to Approved Plan White moved, and Nygard seconded, to grant conceptual approval of the revised plan and directed staff to bring a revised resolution to the February 25,2002 meeting A, ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 11,2002 *5. #01-2709 Rich and Anne Shuil—2285 French Creek Road —Changes to Approved Plan—Continued for adoption. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. 6. i^01-2730 Ace Properties, 3375 Cry stal Bay Road—Variances Larry Palm was present. Weinberger stated the applicants planned to remove an existing building and construct a house on the residential site. He kept the application off the Consent Agenda because he received a new plan just before the meeting. The surveyor had found that the house was actually to be located 9.7’ and 9.8’from the side property line where a 10 ’ setback is required, which would be in addition to the variances listed in the staff report. The first variance was to lot area and lot w idth where i 'A acre and 100 ’ are required. He stated the lot was of the type for which the City routinely grants variances. The second variance was to allow hardcover in the 0-75 ’ zone and to permit greater than 25% hardcover in the 75 - 250 ’ of the lakeshore. Also, a variance was required to allow encroachment into the 30 ’ rear yard setback. The Planning Commission recommended the house not exceed 1,500 s.f. The actual foundation of the building was 50 ’ x 30 ’. exactly 1,500 s.f. A cantilever at the rear of the house extends the floor space slightly, pushing the floor space over 1,500 s.f. Weinberger stated that the cantilever could be a bay window or a bay that would not extend the floor space of the house. Mr. Palm stated that their previous survey had shown that they met the 10 ’ side setback with the house at 30 ’ x 50 ’. He was notified that aflemoon before the meeting that the survey had been redone and they were slightly under the required side setback. He stated they were willing to change the cantilever by installing a bench seat so the floor space is not increased. White asked if approval would set any unwanted precedents. Barrett stated the Council had held to the 10 ’ lot line rule in the past. Nygard stated the land could provide a hardship because of the rear yard setback. Mr. Palm stated that losing even a few inches off the size of the house would negatively impact their plans. They had already downsized as much as possible based on Planning Commission recommendations, and had difficulty fitting the stairs into the plan they presented. Barrett suggested having staff draft a variance resolution with as much case-specific language in it as possible regarding the land and construction issues on that particular lot. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 11,2002 6. UOI-2730 Ace Properties, 3'375 Crystal Bay Road—Variances—Continued Nygard moved, and Mayor Peterson seconded, to grant conceptual approval of the plans with variances for lot area and width, side and rear yard setbacks, and hardcover in 0 - 75' and 75-250' zones with a resolution coming before the Council at the February 25"* meeting. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. *7. #02-2741 Calvin Presbyterian Church, 177 Glendale Drive—Conditional Use Permit—Resolution No. 4753 White moved, and Nygard seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4753 granting a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 3(B) to permit construction of a 3335 s.f. addition to the existing building. Vote; Ayes 3, Nays 0. 8. #02-2743 Thomas J. Dunsmore, 2525/2535/2545 Sbadywood Road—Sketch Plan Review Thomas Dunsmore was present. Weinberger stated that the applicant had proposed a 9-unit office development on a 3.7 acre property. Each office unit would be privately owned, but the units would share a parking lot, pond, landscaped areas, and sidewalk. He stated there was currently no zoning for that use and suggested adopting a PUD ordinance. The property is just south of the County Roads 1 5 and 19 intersection. On one side of the property, the zoning is B4, a general business district with offices allowed. The other side was zoned residential. The Planning Commission’s main concern was if the development would function well with the land around it. They suggested reducing the plan to 8 units, in order to reduce parking requirements and increase open green space. Also, less construction on the back parcel could help reduce flooding of Kelly Avenue. They also suggested that the office complex and neighboring church could agree to use each other’s parking lots for overflow parking since their times of operation would not generally coincide. White stated he felt a PUD was a good idea and would allow the public an opportunity to comment, but w ould like to see the run-off issue resolved and would like a sidewalk installed along the property. Mr. Dunsmore stated he had a responsible architect who has designed simitar developments in Plymouth, Maple Grove, Eden Prairie, Lake Elmo, and other locations. White asked if he would provide photos of the other developments for the Council to view. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 11,2002 8. 802-2743 Thomas J. Dunsmore, 2525/2535/2545 Shadywood Road—Sketch Plan Review—Continued Mayor Peterson stated that the Council would like to begin the commercial PUD process. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT None. PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR'S REPORT *9. Accept Proposal to Bury Electrical Lines from Xcel Energy for Senior Housing Project White moved, and Nygard seconded, to approve the agreement with Xcel Energy, in the amount of S96,771 for burying of the overhead electric power lines for the Orono Ambar project; and to approve a loan from the PIR fund, in the amount of $96,771 with a 5% annual interest rate, to the TIF fund project account for burying overhead electric power lines for the Orono Amhar project, with the loan to be repaid with proceeds from the project's TIF funds and the appropriate budget adjustment for the year 2002 PIR fund budget; and to approve a loan from the PIR fund, in the amount of $27,528 with a S% annual interest i nte, to the TIF fund project account for the installation of decorative street lights for the Orono Ambar project with the loan to be repaid with the proceeds from the project's TIF funds, and the appropriate budget adjustment for the year 2002 PIR fund budget. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. 10. Revise Seasonal Weight Restrictions—Resolution No. 4754 White stated he had kept it off the Consent Agenda and asked how heavy the BFI trucks are. Gappa stated that they are over 4 tons per axle weight. The City enforces load restrictions on Orono streets all year. Streets are 9 tons axle weight limit except when spring road restrictions limit loads to 4 tons axle weight limit, except some service vehicles which can be up to 7 tons axle weight limit. The Police Department is good about ticketing for violations. White asked about private road restrictions. Gappa stated it would be a civil issue and up to the owners to enforce weight limits. White moved, and Nygard seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4754 estabibhing seasonal weight restrictions on Orono Public City Streeb. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 11,2002 10. ReviseSeasonat Weight Restrictions —Resolution No. 4754—Continued Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. *11. Adopt Assessment Roll for 595 Old Crystal Bay Road North Sewer- Resolution No. 4755 White moved, and Nygard seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4755 adopting the assessment roll for the installation of a sanitary sewer service for 595 Old Crystal Bay Road North. Vote; Ayes 3, Nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT *12. Equipment Certificate Sale—Resolution No. 4756 White moved, and Nygard seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4756 accepting the low bid from Anchor Bank, N.A., Wayzata with an interest rate of 1.90% for an equipment certificate in the amount of $50,000 to fund Police vehicle replacements; and to award the equipment certificate to the low bidder. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. *13. Receipt of the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting for the 2000 Financial Report (Information Only) *14. Request for Authorization to Dispose of Used Police Vehicles and Forfeited Vehicle White moved, and Nygard seconded, to authorize the Orono Police Department to sell by sealed bid the: 1) 1999 Ford Crown Victoria Squad Car, 2) 1993 Ford F>150 Pickup truck, 3) 1966 Pontiac Bonneviile. Vote; Ayes 3, Nays 0. *15. Approve Final Plans and Specs for Long Lake Fire Station White moved, and Nygard seconded, to approve the final plans and specifications for the Long Lake Fire Station, and to authorize the advertisement for bids. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. 16. Pay Request and Change Order—Long Lake Fire Station White stated that he had held the item off the Consent Agenda because on the last page of the report it stated, “Dig holes for settlement plates, but GME could not put in because ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 11,2002 16. Pay Request and Change Order —Long Lake Fire Station —Continued they did not have proper poles. BackFiIIed and sent operators home.” He asked if that was the City’s mistake, or GME’s. Mayor Peterson stated they needed clarification on the matter. White moved, and Mayor Peterson seconded, to table Item 16, Pay Request and Change Order—Long Lake Fire Station. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT None. *17. LICENSES Residential Kennel License 1. David and LuAnn Runkle 2684 Casco Point Road Commercial Kennel License 1. D. Brian Fulmer (The Dog House Boarding Kennels, inc.) 3505 West Wayzata Boulevard Cigarette License 1. Steven Corl Navarre Liquors, Inc. 3421 Shoreline Drive 2. Kenneth Galloway Wayzata Country Club 200 Wayzata Boulevard White moved, and Nygard seconded, to approve the above listed licenses. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. 8 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY II, 2002 *18. BILLS White moved, ond Nygard seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. Tom Kuchn, Finance Director, presented to Council the bid tabulation and revised resolution for Item 12, Equipment Certificate Sale. Mayor Peterson moved, and White seconded, to reconsider Item 12. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. Mayor Peterson moved, and Nygard seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4756 awarding sale of $50,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 2002, fixing the form and specifications thereof, providing for their execution and delivery, and levying taxes for their payment Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. Mr. Koehnen from the Navarre Amoco stated that he had attended the meeting to thank the City Council for their help in the improvements to his service station canopy. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:10 p.m. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara Peterson, Mayor / PATRICK D.McGOWAN HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF ROOM 6 COURTHOUSE 360 SOUTH FIFTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS.MN 55415 » , FEB 2 5 2002 a h • -t I « ) (612) 340-3740 FAX 346-4208 OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF December 4,2001 Chairman Bert Foster Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 18338 Minnetonka Boulevard Deephaven, MN 55391 Dear Chairman Foster: Growing concerns over the heavy recreational usage of Lake Minnetonka and the ever increasing demands on Hennepin County Sheriffs Office (HCSO) Water Patrol personnel on other county waters led to Uie implementation of a new program during the 2001 boating season. Two seasonal HCSO deputies were assigned to Lake Minnetonka exclusively. This program was a combined effort of the HCSO, the Hennepin County Board, the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD), local governments and area businesses. Deputies Jeff Biebl and Matt Hagen were assigned to Water Patrol from mid-May to mid-October on a middle shift corresponding to the highest need for patrol services. Both deputies performed well with their diverse patrd assignment. They maintained a proactive presence by enforcing LMCD ordinances, making BWI anests and responding to medical emergencies and calls for help. They also responded to accidents and citizen complaints. This increased visibility created a safer environment for both local residents and lake users as well as our own Water Patrol staff. This new program was initiated by extensive media coverage, sending a message to lake users that there would be a substantial increase of coverage on Lake Minnetonka. This public awareness contributed to a safer boating season demonstrated by: > No boating fatalities on Lake Minnetonka in the 2001 boating season; > The reduction of personal injury accidents by more than 50%; > An increase in public contact, but a lower citation count. .D/ During the 2000 boating season, licensed deputies spent 1,595.6 hours patrolling Lake Minnetonka. In 2001, that —level was increased by 59% to 2,546 patrol hours. Lake Minnetonka accounted for 81% of all licensed deputy • \ ••patrol hours. As the Unit Commander, I felt comfortable with our staffing on Lake Minnetonka. These additional deputies helped create a safer working environment for our licensed deputies and special deputies. I knew that Lake Minnetonka was covered regardless of the demands for our services on other county waterways. Sincerely, ijl Lt. Brian Johnson Unit Commander cc: Gregory S. Nybeck, Executive Director ir \ • DEC 5- Z001 .i!':! li.'U • ___ Hetjdtd 20% P0St- C9mnimMf Fibtf Fact sheet on report: Boating Trends on Lake Minnetonka, 1984 to 2i miL Background : The report is descriptive, not judgmental. Boating conditions and trends are only described and not discussed as positive or negative. bNA The report covers the period 1984 to 2000, during which time LMCD/DNR have studied boating on the Lake with a consistent methodology. Since 1992, LMCD/DNR have done boat counts ever two years, and boater surveys ever four years. All studies cover the summer period from Memorial Day weekend to Labor Day. Major findin£: The report documents stability over the years in terms of boating use and boater’s experience on the Lake. By 1984, a general pattern of boating use and boater experience existed, and basically this general pattern exists today, albeit with some variations. Specific Highlights : 1 . Boat numbers on the Lake are stable over time. 2. The geographic pattern of use of the Lake is stable over time (East used more heavily than Southwest, for example). 3. The temporal pattern of use — at least for riparian residents, for whom we have this type of data — is stable over time. For riparians, the same allocation of boating occurs between weekends and weekdays, and by hour within weekend days, and by hour within weekdays. 4. Source contributions: The major contributors to boats on the Lake are riparian residents (30%) and commercial accesses (30%), followed by public accesses (25%) and municipal docks (1 5%). Public access has incrca.sed some over time, and commercial access has decreased some over time. 5. Boating activities: The Lake is mostly used for boat riding (cruising) and less so for fishing and other activities. Boat riding has increased some over time, and fishing has decreased some. 6. Boating equipment: The Lake — being a large body of water — has always been a place for larger boats. Over time, the boats have gotten bigger, more powerful and more substantial. Few utility/fi.shing boats arc still in use on the Lake. 7. Boating experience: -Satisfaction with boating on the Lake has stayed consistently high over time. -Boaters perception of crowding on the Lake has remained constant over time. To be sure, the Lake is a crowded place to boat, but it hasn't gotten more crowded over time, according to boaters. -Boaters are much more aware of an enforcement presence on the Lake now as compared with 1984. However, few boaters (5%) believe this level of enforcement is “too high"; most think it is “about right" (54%). -In addition, boating restrictions that are in place are not commonly viewed as detractors to the boating experience (5%). Restrictions are much more likely to be viewed as adding to the enjoyment of boating (40%) or not affecting enjoyment (55%). 8. Public access: -Boaters using public access give high marks to these facilities as places to launch/land a boat. -The primary use problem public access boaters have is the quantity of public access parking available, and the primary improvement these boaters want is more parking spaces. f Orono, Minnesota nbering Index Map wernnsc^wen.i«tsde.K Bausa. norlh acvtin* NT*. iMi mn M. tier, f• itfo sm€ t. Mil 4m. MLtttI AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25,2002,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA {•) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Counc under the Consent Ilcm^ on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items arc available in tl Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet. ROLL CALL CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approvc/Amend APPROVAL OF MINUTES • 2. Regular Council Meeting of February ! 1,2002 ticpTiNQ i-tB 2 5 2002 V... 1 wr UMONO PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Pauline Bouchard, Representative PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Sandy Smith. Representative LMCD REPORT - Lili McMillan PUBLIC CO4MMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 3. «01 -2699 Jay and Kendall Nygard, 1386 Rest Point Road - Variances - Resolution 4. #01-2706 Richard Stark, 815 Partenwood Road - Variance Review • Resolution 5. #01-2709 Richard and Anne Shull - 2285 French Creek Road - Variance - Resolution • 6. #01-2730 Ace Properties, 3375 Crystal Bay Road - Variances - Resolution 7. #02-2746 Mark Finney, 3210 North Shore Drive-Variances • 8. #02-2747 Tonka Ventures, 3749 Livingston Avenue - Easement Vacation - Resolution 9. #02-2749 Thomas P. Egan, 350,360,370 Big Island - Vacation • 10. #02-2750 EdwardandMichelle Winer, 2010 Shoreline Drive-Variance-Resolution • II. #01-2751 Mark Welsh, 3625 North Shore Drive • Variances - Resolution 12. #02-2754 Matthew and Kathy DollifT, 2680 Pheasant Road - Variance - Resolution 13. #02-2755 Long Lake Fire Station - City of Orono, 340 Willow Drive North - Class III Subdi visioi Variance and Conditional Use Permit NUYOR/COUNCIL REPORT PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR’S REPORT 14. Accept Donation of Storage Shed 15. Bid Award - 2002 Materials and Equipment 16. Request for Final Payment - Navarre Park Project 17. Support of Mound Skate Park - Resolution AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY. FEBRUARY 25,2002,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MLN7VESOTA CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 18. Accept Donations for Parks 19. Pay Request and Change Order - Long Lake Fire Station 20. Pay Requests - Long Lake Fire Station 21. Request for Authorization to Dispose of Forfeited Vehicle 22. Schedule Volunteer Commission Interviews 23. City Open House Plans 24. Schedule Work Sessions cm' ATTORNEY’S REPORT 25. LICENSES One Day Gambling • Resolution Special Events • 26. BILLS UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 2fl02 02/25 -Council Meeting. 7:00 p.m. -rgsTiii I J Application Complete: Application Deadline: 11/12AI1 3/11/02 ««cpTINQ FEB 2 5 2002 VI11 ^rxjtiONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Fcbruar>' 20. 2002 ITEM NO.o Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#01*2699 Jay and Kendall Nygard 1386 Rest Point Road Variances Zoning District:LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (I acre) List of Exhibits A B C D Resolution Site Plan Planning Report (January 2.2002) Planning Commission Minutes (Januarv- 22, 2002) Application: Applicants have requested a variance to Section 10.24, Subdivision S (B) to permit a two story addition for an entiy way and second floor living space. The addition is proposed to be 8' from the east property line encroaching 2’ into the 10' required side yard setback. The 2' variance is requested to allow the proposed addition to match the e.xisting e.\terior wall on the house. Currently, the house is located 8’ from the property line. A second variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (2) is requested to permit an alteration to existing hardcover over 25% in the 75-250 ’ lakeshore setback. Property owners propose to remove additional hardcover by reducing the size of the rock garden located between the street and the house, to result in no net hardcover increase on the properly. Planning Commission Recommendation To approve variances to permit the addition to be located 8* from the side property line and to permit hardcover variances in the 75-250 ’ lakeshore setback where 2,822 s.f. exists and 1,346 is allowed. A recommendation of approval shall include the following special conditions; I.All landscaping plastic located on the property shall be removed prior to the flnal building inspection for the new addition. An equal amount of existing hardcover shall be removed from the rock garden area to compensate for the total net increase in hardcover for the addition. Gutters shall be installed to direct roof drainage away from the structure. > #01-2699 Jay and Kendall Nygard 1386 Rest Point Road Paye 2 of 2_________________ Ul]iStaff RecommendX To approve the attached resolution based on the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt the attached resolution approving variances. I A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION I; SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) (2); AND SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE NO. 01-2699 WHEREAS, Jay Thomas Nygard and Kendall Mae Nygard, (hereinafter "the applicants") are ox^Tiers of the property located at 1386 Rest Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lot 5, Subdivision of Lot 14. Rest Point Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (2) to permit an alteration to existing hardcover over 25% for a two-story residential addition and variances to Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit an addition 8’ from the side property line where a 10’ setback is required; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 22, 2002, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #01 -2699. 2.The property is located in the LR-IB, Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. Page 1 of 6 3. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 22,2002 and recommended approval of variances by a vote of 6 to 0. Planning Commission recommended approval based on the following findings ot fact: A.The property was developed prior to current zoning standards. The house Is currently located as close as T from the property line and gradually moves further from the property line as the house is further from the lake. The point where the new addition would join the existing house is 8' from the property line. B.The addition increases overall hardcover on the property, however the total lot coverage by structure would be within the 15% limit allowed by Code. The total existing hardcover is 2,822 s.f. (52.4%). Planning Commission recommended the property owners shall reduce an equal amount of hardcover to result in no more than 2,822 s.f. of hardcover on the property when the project is complete. A 50 gallon tank is located under the driveway to handle runoff from the driveway. A draintile and gutter system is proposed to direct water around the new addition. E.The property located east of the applicant's lot is at a higher elevation preventing any drainage from entering the neighboring property. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely sers e as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 6 6.The City Council has considered this application including the Findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (2) to permit an alteration to existing hardcover over 25% for a two-story residential addition and variances to Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit an addition 8' from the side property line where a 10 ’ setback is required subject to the following conditions: 1. 3. 4. 5. The property shall be developed in conformance with the site plan attached as Exhibit A. Prior to a building permit, the final plans shall be shown on the Certificate of Sur\'ey by a I icensed engineer/surveyor. The plans shall indicate all proposed finished grades and elevations for the draintile pipe. Unless specifically approved by the City, the draintile shall drain above the top of the hill and at the 75' setback. Authorities granted by the variances run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application fora building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or these variances will expire on that date (February 25, 2003). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of the variances shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned owners have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Page 3 of 6 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of February, 2002, ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson. Mayor Property Owners STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day of February, 2002 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN day ofThe foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _______ ____________. 200 ____by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of .^20. personally appeared before me, ____who is personally known to me ____whose identity I proved on the basis of .a credible____whose identity 1 proved on the oath/affirmation_______________ witness and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of ..20. personally appeared before me, ____who is personally known to me ____whose identity I proved on the basis of, a credible____whose identity I proved on the oath/afTirmation_______________ witness and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public Pages of 6 ^js?sa'fa E«t>ibitA 'i / ................................................... '..s 62"di' bi'”F esros'” Page 6 of 6 T1 i J J j J ‘ \ \ \ : ; i / AppUcatton Complete: Application Deadline: 11/12/01 3/11/02 C TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Paul Weinberger. Zoning Administrator/Planner January 2,2002 #01-2699 Jay and Kendall Nygard 1386 Rest Point Road Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (I acre) List of Exhibits: A Application B Plat Map C Site Survey D Hardcover Calculation Worksheets E Elevation Views F Floor Plans G Property Owner Notification List Application: Applicants have requested variances to permit a 207 s.f., two story addition for an entry way and second floor living space. The addition is proposed to be 8* from the east property line encroaching 2' into the 10’ required side yard setback. The 2' variance is requested to allow the proposed addition to match the existing exterior wall on the house. Currently, the house is located 8' from the property line. A second variance is requested to permit additional hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback. Proposed is to increase the total hardcover in the 75-250' setback by 120 s.f. The addition would be partially located over an existing concrete walk, stoop and rock garden. 101-2699 Jay and Kendall Nytard 1386 Rest Point Road I«iu«y22.2002 Pa|clor3 Pertinent Code Sections: Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B): Yard requirements. 10' side yard setback. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (2): Allowed Hardcover. Lot Area 75*250 ’ setback = 5,384 s.f. Existing Hardcover = 2,822 s.f. (52.4%) Proposed Hardcover = 2,942 s.f. (54.6%) Review of Hardcover: The hardcover numbers noted above do not reflect the amount of non-conforming landscaping plastic on the property, which is a change from the percentages as noted on the hardcover calculation worksheets. Also, note the two rock gardens located in the 75-250 ’ setback are only considered 50% hardcover based on the rock gardens are not impervious as the rocks are located over natural surface. Rather than calculate the individual area of each rock the 50% figure was used to average the total hard surface over each garden. Issues for Discussion: 1.The property was developed prior to current zoning standards. The house is currently located as close as T from the property line and gradually moves further from the property line as the house gets further from the ltdee. The point where the new addition would join the existing house is 8’ from the property line. The overhang from the house would be located approximately 5’ from the property line, where an overhang cannot be located closer than 8.5’ to a property line. The addition increases overall hardcover on the property, however the total lot coverage by structure would be below the 15% allowed by Code. Does the size of the house, relative to the size of the lot, allow for certain hardcover alterations over 25% to permit the property to maximize overall structure (14.6%)? 3.The addition will create 120 s.f more hardcover on the property than preexisting conditions. Should an equal amount of hardcover be removed to compensate for the additional hardcover? Proposed lot coverage by structures is as follows: House 1,418 s.f Shed 85 s.f Total 1,503 s.f / 10,282 = 14.6% «0l-2699 hy and Kendall Nygard 1386 Rest Point Road Januaiy 22.2002 Pate 2 of 3 L.fcjtunrkMCarra- Applicant has stated the hardship is the house was built prior to the adoption of current zoning standards. Planning Cominissi>>^> fW A^SB A.Recommend approval of variance to permit the addition to be located 8' from the side property line and to permit 2,942 s.f. (54.6%) hardcover in the 75-250’ lakeshore setback where 2,822 s.f. exists and 1.346 is allowed. A recommendation of approval shall include the following special conditions: 1.All landscaping plastic located on the property shall be removed prior to the final building inspection for the new addition. 2. Final drainage plan shall include approved drainage plan to allow stormwater to be channeled around the east side of the house. 3. Gutters shall be installed if required to improve drainage from the roof line. B. Recommend denial, stating reasons. C. Table, provide direction to applicant on possible plan revisions. Staff Recommendation Alternative A. Staff recommendation finds the existing house was constructed prior to adoption of current zoning standards. The new addition would not encroach closer than the existing house, and the total lot coverage by structures would not exceed 15% on the property. •01-2699 Jay and KendaU Nytard tJMacaroimaotd l«Miaiy22.2002 ra«c3or3 f a{ cation # Q! Date RecciTcd 7*18______ Amount Paid A CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $220:6(r ^60*^^ ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $120.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $220.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFOIL\UTIpN Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 117- ' 23-3*^ - Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Prop erty ^quired ______________________________^(month/year) I (do) /do not ^lso own the adjacent parcels of land. PresentiSeofproperty: ^ residential ___pother (specify)______________________ Zoning District:__________________________________________________________ APPLICANT Name Phone (home)_ Phone (work)_ Address:City:.Zip:. OWNER (if different than applicant)ent than appi Address! (1^0 Ph /7I'f f. p Phone (home ) ^ ^ Phone (work)__ City:Zip: <57^ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Descri^ request in detail: ut\rl ^ _____________1 _ Estimated Construction Cost $ ^OO 4<v A/ i ^i J^ AjJifrt-n (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ___Lot Width % I Setback:Front ^Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty, or unusual property conditio^ preventing conmliance with Zoning Code reqimements: /Vi It iV_________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) s f? .<^ >/r/ Kl .^*'* • *. ', • • •' ••• * » (> * V I • « , c? - •'•' ’ } :•... V " Parc^ Irifornu^^ ParMi ID071172S33MM.::^i'f^^ ' L"’ C* Houm Nwiibar 13M^ ^,-r^«K ronnomipram 7M a nor* f^iwiiy mcoflMffl^pL ff f^prM^ • cofi$litori0lf' snddata from City. County, ond SM» lutf MfMrWM «|d!oi^ I HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 929.4 CONTOUR UNE MINNETONKA LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES ,; Lot 5, Subdivision of Lot 14, Rest Point Pork WEST ARM o : denotes iron marker Bearings shown are based upon on assumed dotim. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, the location of an existing house thSlicotion of oil visible “hordeover" thereon. It does not > * •' / / i HARDCOVEKJCALCULATlOiN WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 75-250' 250-500' EXISTING HARDCOVERJNZQNE A. House Unglh \OA X X X Widih B. Oarage C. Ori\'eway X X D. Sidewalk X X S€ ».T7 W. E. Palio/Deck • • •• X F. Landscape UnderUin By Plastic Or Fabric X X X 0. Other 6.^ TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ____________ ♦ B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE’ A. House _____________ X Length X X X B. Oarage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk E. Palio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X X X X X 0. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ B X 100 Width kesf i^iHT /0‘3-oi j) 500.1000' a£ 29 Zl^ 2? m V«T» xlOO -z-s £' S.F. S.F. •Sh EO S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 60M6rCT£ SF*5Tgn^r»dr S.F. S.F. ^ . QdCK ^ S.F. S.F. COfU^f S.F.'PATipeipeieS < picnic T;^eiE S.F. A S.F. B % S.F. S.F.- SMFO S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.- STO*^B^ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SF ?ATIt> BtOCKS S.F. A S.F. B % J hardcover CALCULAXUMLVVORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) gmSTINC HAUnCOVER IN ZONE A House _____________ 0-75'2S0-S00' tmgdi ITM Sti.fr. Kfk X X X <B B. Oarage • m • C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E Paiio/Deck X X F. LandKape Underlain 1^ Plastic Or Fabric O. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A __________ * B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE’ A House ________ Ungth X X X B. Oarage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X 0. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ' _ _ ♦ B I e \,n N 100 Width xIOO *OlNl /C -S-O/f 500-1000' 12U 6^ .^33. \oT 1016 i S3 8^ 34.021 IHtS-5 8?3 n S.F. -HO(;s£ ^ _ equate R0CIC SF.'dW»frl H’ UKC tPci<S.F.-AttfnffiJ S.F. StACSTTOP S.F. S.F.'5l0eCM«U^ S.?.-iW^*WAL S.F. S.F. gPU4 PlAt^ S.F.'lHCMMeg S F ST.-vnSDO S.F.-5TefPtrtfc STPrsC S.F. A S.F. B % _S.F.' . S.F. ttVSu a - R ock &AE0SKJ S.F. S.F. S.F.5t*^W*'v S.F. 3P KJeeJ SitAs)a S-h^S S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. Uleea v OolAA 2.SV2.3 S.F. • V _S.F. H A B i ib.o I €* MSW AOOlTIOM \ V. \ \ L 1 .\ ■'\Im ?4rtr ^ivaMRn '* 1nr%fi u r... . . , -<^airr. ‘jvr~ -- r- \)ie^ § • I 5 ^ fla/ • • • . . ■ •• . ■ , • .* •• 6i^b«5 'I floof . ^ • I • . t, ' RUN DATE •4/2A/ii iATCN SRS NEIMPXN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFOimATXCIN SVSTEH PROPERTY ONNERS LIST REPORT NO. PXASSAil PAOE if PROP AOOR OUNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SO 07-117-2S 52 0057 •157S REST POINT RO N • t L K OERLXCHER NXCHAEL i 0 LYNNE OERtICNER 1575 REST POINT RD HOUND HN S55M 50 07-117-25 55 0002 ilAOO REST POINT RD LILLIAN D NILLXAHS LILLIAN D UILLIAHS lAiO REST POINT RD HOUND HN 55500 50 07-117-25 55 OOOO 11590 REST POINT RD L K JOHNSON OCR JQHI6QN LYLE K JOHNSON 2757 IRVING AVE SO HPLS HN 55000 PROP ADDR OUNER NAHE TAXPAYER HAHE/ADOR SO 07-117-25 55 0005 01590 REST POINT RD PON NALSH PATRICK J NALSH 1590 REST POINT RO HOUND HN 55500 50 07-117-25 55 0000 01500 REST POINT RD J T NY6ARD 0 K N NY6AR0 J T NY6AR0 I K H NY6AR0 1500 REST POINT RD HOUND HN 55500 50 07-117-25 55 0007 01500 REST POINT RD 6 J LARSEN OSD LARSEN STEPHANIE i t 6REG0 J LARSEN 1500 REST POINT RO HOUND HN 55500 PROP AOOR OUNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 50 07-117-25 55 0009 01595 REST POINT RO • CAVENOER t C CAVENOER RARiARA 0 COLLINS CAVENOER 925 NINOENORE CURVE PLYHOUTH HN 55001 50 07-117-25 55 0010 01005 REST POINT RD C CAVENOER I i CAVENOER COLLINS CAVENOER 0 RARiARA CAVENOER 1005 REST POINT RD HOUND HN 55500 50 07-117-25 55 0011 015R5 REST POINT RD 0 U 0 J L RAHN DAVID U 0 JODI L RAHN 1505 REST POINT RD HOUND HN 55500 PROP ADDR OUNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 50 07-117-25 55 0012 * 01570 REST POINT RO 0 R RLOOH OTA RLOOH GEORGE R 0 THERESA A RLOOH 1570 REST POINT RO HOUND HN 55500 50 07-117-25 55 0015 01005 REST POINT RO C CAVENOER 0 R CAVENOER C CAVENOER 0 i CAVENOER 1005 REST POINT RO HOUND HN 55500 TOTAL RATCH 505 00011 I CERTIPY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE REST OF HY KNOULEDGE AND RELIEF DATE .. SaSdilj^ #2tJ99 ilte iilii iiiRiift MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMiVUSSION Tuesday, January 22,2002 6:30 o’clock p.m. D ROLL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chair Elizabeth Hawn, Commissioners Jeanne Mabusth, Janice Berg, Daniel Kluth, and Alternates J. Mark Fritzler, and David Rahn. Commissioners William Stoddard and Sandra Smith were absent. The following represented City Staff: Planning Director Michael Gaflron, Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator Wendy Bottenbcrg, and Recorder Jackie Young. Chair Hawn called the meeting to order at 6:32 p.m. OLD BUSINESS (#1) #01-2699 JAY AND KENDALL NYG.ARD, 1386 REST POINT ROAD, VARIANCES, 6:32 p.m. - 6:49 p.m. Jay Nygard, Applicant, was present. Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting variances to permit a two-story addition to the existing house, which will provide for an entryway and second floor living space. The addition is proposed to be located eight feet ftom the east property line encroaching two feet into the 10-foot required side yard setback. The ^vo•foot variance is l^ing requested to allow the proposed addition to match the e.xisting exterior wall on the house. The residence is currently located eight feet from the property line and was constructed prior to current zoning standards. A second variance is also being requested to permit additional hardcover in the 75-250* lakeshore setback. The total hardcover w'ould be increased by 120 square feet. The addition would be partially located over an existing concrete walk, stoop, and rock garden. The Applicant has agreed to remove a portion of the landscape rock and plastic, which will keep the existing hardcover at the current amount of 52.4 percent. Weinberger stated the hardcover numbers included in the Staff report do not reflect the amount of non-conforming landscaping plastic, noting the amount of landscape plastic was deducted from the hardcover numbers and will be removed from the property upon approval of the application. The Applicant has submitted a statement indicating he suffers a hardship because the house was built prior to the adoption of the current zoning standards and was located only eight feet from the existing property line. Weinberger reiterated the addition would not increase the total hardcover on the property, with the existing hardcover remaining at 52.4 percent where 25 percent is allowed. Weinberger stated the addition would be considered structural coverage that would be replacing essentially a rock garden. Weinberger stated the addition would no longer increase the hardcover by 120 square feet since the Applicant has agreed to remove additional hardcover on that portion of the property. Weinberger noted the total structural coverage on the property is 14.6 percent. Staff recommends approval of the application subject to the three conditions outlined in the January 2,2002 Staff memorandum based on the fact the house was originally constructed eight feet from the property line and the new addition would not increase the total structural coverage on the property over the maximum 15 percent limit. PAGE I MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, January 22,2002 6:30 o’clock pjn. (#01-2699 Jay and Kendall Nygard, Continued) Hawn inquired how much hardcover the driveway consists of in that zone. Weinberger stated the driveway is almost 900 square feet, which would be between 15 and 20 percent of the entire hardcover of the lot located within the 75-250 ’ setback area. Nygard stated he docs have approximately a 50-gallon drain trap located in the driveway which docs help alleviate the drainage in this area. Nygard noted the structural coverage being requested is 14.6 percent, and inquired whether he could increase the structural coverage by .4 percent. Nygard stated he understands his lot would then be considered fully built and that no other increases to structural coverage would be allowed. Nygard stated he is agreeable to removing the plastic and rock, and would be installing gutters on the house as well as drain tile to help alleviate the drainage. There were no public comments regarding this application. Hawn suted typically the Planning Commission only approves the plan that is in front of them, noting the Applicant did request he be allowed to increase the structural coverage slightly. Hawn noted the hardcover on this lot is well over the allowable 25 percent, and questioned whether a hardship really does exist. Hawn stated the Planning Commission generally considers a hardship to be imposed by the land itself, but in her opinion a hardship may exist since the house was constructed prior to current zoning ordinances. Mabusth stated the comments by Hawn are consistent with the Planning Commission’s recommendations in the past. Mabusth stated this application could be tabled which would give the Applicant a chance to bring a revised plan back before the Planning Commission. Mabusth stated she personally does not have a problem with the application, and inquired what the current overhang is. Weinberger stated the current overhang is under one foot. Mabusth stated she did not observe any overhangs on the other part of the structure. Nygard stated the overhang is one* foot total. Mabusth stated it was her recollection the survey showed a three-foot overhang. Nygard stated the surveyor may have assumed a standard three-foot overhang, which is incorrect. Nygard stated he does not have a problem removing the request for the extra .4 percent structural coverage, noting he originally added his numbers incorrectly. Mabusth stated typically the Planning Commission likes to see the final plan before approving any increase in structural coverage. Nygard sUted he basically would extend the addition one foot Hawn inquired whether he would be willing to remove a little additional hardcover. PAGE 2 A MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, January 22,2002 6:30 o'dock pjn. (MOl-2699 Jay and Kendall Nygard, Continued) Nygard stated he would remove more of the rock garden. Kluth noted although it is unusual for the Planning Commission to approve plans that have been amended prior to the changes being reflected on a final drawing, they have in certain cases done that in the past. Hawn inquired whether the neighbors are fine with this proposal. Nygard stated they are. Mabusth inquired how the Applicant is able to deal with backing out onto Rest Point Road. Nyitard stated he generally backs up into the driveway to avoid having to back out onto the street. Nygard indicated the neighborhood generally encourages everyone to drive slow through this area. Mabusth stated in her view issue number two should be further discussed at the<r next Planning Commission meeting. Mabusth stated she would also like a clarification on overhangs by the City Attorney. Mabusth noted residents are allowed a l.S foot overhang. Hawn stated it was her understanding that had been changed to two feet. Nygard indicated the Planning Commission agreed that it should not encroach into the ten-foot setback. Nygard stated you are allowed two feet of overhang that does not count as structural coverage but it should not encroach into the 10-foot setback. Mabusth stated she would like to know where that 10-foot setback ends, whether it is 8.5 feet from the overhang or from the house. Mabusth stated it was her understanding if the structure met the setback, you were then allowed a 1.5 foot overhang. Weinberger stated that basically is the deflnition. Hawn stated if the Planning Commission does approve the application with the .4 percent increase in hardcover, the Applicant would be required to have final plans submitted reflecting that change prior to the City Council meeting. Nygard stated he would. Rahn stated the Applicant did indicate the square footage would be added towards the front and not the back of the structure. Rahn stated he does not want to see it encroach any closer to the side setbacks. Hawn moved, Mabusth seconded, to recommend approval of Application #01*2699, Jay and Kendall Nygard, 1386 Rest Point Road, granting of a variance to permit an addition to encroach two feet into the 10 foot required side yard setback, with the understanding the structural coverage will not exceed the allowable 15 percent, and subject to, one, the Applicant submitting a final plan prior to the City Council meeting showing the additional .4 percent structural coverage; two, a drainage and gutter plan will also be submitted at the same time prior to the City Council PAGES MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMIvnSSION Tuesday, January 22,2002 6:30 o’clock p.m. (#01-2699 Jay and Kendall Nygard, Continued) meeting; three, the existing rock garden will be reduced by such size that the total project does not exceed the 52.4 percent existing hardcover; and four, all landscaping fabric will be removed. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. #01-2730 ACE PROPERTIES, 3375 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD, VARIANCES Larry R|lin and Gary Gniflke, Acc Properties, were present. Weinbcrgen|^ted the application was before the Planning Commission in November, at which time the application w^i^abled to allow the Applicant time to revise his plan. The Planning Commission at that time had recomm^ded the size of the house be reduced to meet the 15 percent structural coverage as well as meet the iWoot side yard setbacks on each side of the house. This property is locatem^3375 Crystal Bay Road, which runs along the lake and is narrow in depth, with all the properties havi|» access onto the road. Located behind each of the properties in this area is the Dakota Rail, which is noW in the process of being converted into a regional trail system. Weinberger stated the Applicantyhavc revised the plan to reduce the size of the structure from the previous proposal, but are still requiting to construct a 1,643 square foot house. This property has a defined lot area of 6,690 square feet!^&operties less than 10,000 square feet are allowed a maximum lot coverage by structure up to 1,500 squar^et. The proposed building exceeds the allowed coverage by 143 square feet. The Applicaiiii are requesting variances to lot\ea and ’ width to permit construction of the new residence on the property, which is located in th^^-lC district, and consists of less than one-half acre and less than 100 feet wide. The defined lot widthf^O feet at the lakeshorc and defined structure setback. Variances arc also being requested for hardc^r and structure within 75 feet of the lakeshorc, where no hardcover or structure is allowed, and a varian^to permit greater than 25 percent hardcover in the 75-250 ’ setback. The Applicants are proposing 53.'^Krcent hardcover in the 75-250 ’ setback where 72.5 percent currently exists. Weinberger stated there^^ possibility the hardcover in this area could be reduced further by the removal of some concrete and s^js. Hardcover in the 0-75 ’ area is proposed at 748 square feet or 23.8 percent, where currently 45.1 p^ent exists and none is allowed. In addition, variances are also being requested to allow a one-foot en^achment into the side setback. Weinberger stated the proposed residence is 3 1 feet w ide, with the lot bei^O feet w ide, and a 10-foot side setback being required on cither side of the house. Weinberger stated ifW house is reduced by one foot, it would meet the 10-foot side setback on either side of the house. InVuition. the applicants arc requesting a variance to the rear yard setback to allow the structure to be loca& 19.2 feet from the rear property line where 30 feet is required. Weinberger noted this lot docs not baclSip to another residential lot. Weinberger stated a variance is also required to permit the caves and gutters to encroach 1.5 feet into the side setback. The proposed eaves encroach three feet into the east setback aiu into the west setback. than rofeet PAGE 4 V J FEB 2 5 2002 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION OH Y ur UHONO Department Approval: Name Wendy Bottenberg Title Zoning Adminstraior/PIanner DATE: 2/20/02 ITEM NO.: / Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: M)l>2706 Richard & Jane Stark 81S Partenwood Road Variances Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 Acre) 44,225 s.f. (1.02 acre) List of Exhibits: A B Resolution Staff Report and Exhibits of 2/19/2002 Application Summary: In September 2001 the City Council adopted, on consent. Resolution No. 4693 for Richard and Jane Stark to grant the renewal of variances to permit construction of a four stall garage and additional living area to a one level residence at 815 Partenwood Road. The original variance was granted in 1997 and was renewed in 1998,1999,2000 and 2001. Richard and Jane Stark bought the property in 2001 and were the owners when the variances were renewed in 2001. The applicants builder, Ron Lauer, applied for a building permit and when the plans were reviewed there was a conflict w ith the amount of hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone versus the amount approved. The plans had a larger amount than the approved plan. The owner agreed to remove the excess hardcover. On February 11,2002, City Council reviewed this application and by a 3 to 0 vote directed staff to bring the application to Planning Commission for further review. Council members stated they did not have concerns with the changes but because the site plan is different than previously appro\ed. Planning Commission should review the changes, make the appropriate recommendation and then go forward to the City Council for final action. It was during these discussions which the property owTiers decided not to construct the addition on the east side of the residence. Instead, they proposed slightly larger decks and changing one of the decks into a screen porch, both are on the lakeside of the residence. The proposed changes are as follows: 1. Addition (“A”) on the east will be not be constructed. Approved for 344 s.f. Decrease of 344 s.f. 2. Deck “B” will be a screen porch. Approved for 84 s.f L... ! f •' “ Proposing 141 s.f. Increase of 57 s.f. 3. Deck“C” Approved for 198 s.f. Proposing 337 s.f. Increase of 139 s.f. The lot coverage by structures was approved at 3,410 s.f. (7.7%). The lot coverage by structures will decrease by 148 s.f. with the new proposal. The new proposal meets the approved hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone. The location of the structure is what changes. The proposal incorporates more structure in the 0- 75' setback zone on the lake side of the residence, rather than on the side of the residence further from the lake. The proposed deck and screen porch are approximately 40' from the lake and are not the two story addition previously approved. The deck and screen porch do not affect any adjacent properties. The house and garage are both located in the 0-75' setback zone. The residence was built prior to current zoning standards. PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 6 to 0 vote to: Approve the application as presented. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the enclosed resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution. ■ ■ imi ■ a ■ i < ■ 1 I A RESOLUTION GRANTING OF VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2 FILE NO. 01-2706 WHEREAS, Richard R. Stark and Jane M. Stark (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 815 Partenwood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lot 2, Block 2, Partenwood (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions I and 2 to allow the remodeling and expansion of the existing residence to include a four stall garage, construction of a screen porch 38' from the 929.4 OHWL mark by adding 57 s.f. to a lakeside deck, and adding 140 s.f. to a lakeside deck located 33' from the 929.4 OHWL where 75' is required and a hardcover variance of 4.233 s.f. (15.0%) where 5,815 s.f. (20%) is existing and none is allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. Minnesota: FINDINGS I. This application was reviewed as Zoning File ^01-2706. The property is located in the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring one acre in area. The property' consists of 1.02 acre. 3.1 he City Council approved Resolution No. 4693 for variances to permit a four stall garage and additional living space to the existing residence. 4.1 he property owner made changes to the approved site plan, and the Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 19, 2002. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: Page 1 of 5 5. 6. A. The configuration of the lot severely restricts the allowable building pad. B The amount of hardcover in the O' to 75' lakeshore setback would be reduced from 20% to 15.0%. I he City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safely and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 to allow the remodeling and expansion of the existing residence to include a four stall garage, construction of a screen porch 38' from the 929.4 OHWL mark by adding 57 s.f. to a lakeside deck, and adding 140 s.f. to a lakeside deck located 33' from the 929.4 OHWL where 75' is required; a hardcover variance of 4,233 s.f. (15.0%) where 5,815 s.f. (20%) is existing and none is allowed, subject to the following; 1. This resolution supersedes Resolution No. 4693. 2.Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 3.All plastic under landscaping must be removed in the O' to 75' lakeshore setback prior to any new construction. Page 2 of 5 4. 5. No further variances will be granted to this property in the future. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (February 25, 2003). 6.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of February, 2002. AITEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day of February, 2002, by Barbara A, Peterson and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Mirmesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of Page 3 of 5 the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 2002, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared .known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 2002, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 T-t*" TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Wendy Bottcnberg, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE: Februar>' 14,2002 SUBJECT:#01-2706 Richard R. Stark 815 Partenwood Road Variance Change - Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 Acre) 44,225 s.f. (1.02 acre) List of Exhibits: A Analysis B Proposed Site Plan C Council Report (2/11/02) Pertinent Code Sections: Section 10.22, Subd. 1: Lakeshore Setback Regulations Section 10.22, Subd. 2: Lakeshore Hardcover Requirements Application Summary: In September 2001 the Cit>' Council adopted, on consent, Resolution No. 4693 for Richard and Jane Stark to grant the renewal of variances to permit construction of a four stall garage and additional living area to a one level residence at 815 Partenwood Road. The original variance was granted in 1997 and renewed in 1998,1999,2000, and 2001. Rii l ard and Jane Stark bought the property in 2001 and were the owners when the variances were renewed in 2001. The applicants builder, Ron Lauer applied for a building permit and when the plans were reviewed there was a conflict with the amount of hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone versus the amount approved. The plans had a larger amount than the approved plan. The owTier agreed to remove the excess hardcover. On February 11,2002, City Council reviewed this application and by a 3 to 0 vote directed staff to bring the application to Planning Commission for further review. Council members stated they did not have concerns with the changes but because the site plan is different than previously approved. Planning Commission should review the changes, make the appropriate recommendation and then go forward to the City Council for final action. 1-2706 Richard and Jane Stark 815 Partenwood Variance Changes page I of 3 It was during these discussion which the property owners decided not to construct the addition on the east side of the residence. Instead, they are proposing slightly larger decks and changing one of the decks into a screen porch, both are on the lakeside of the residence. The proposed changes are as follows: (Exhibit B) I. Addition (“A") on the east will be not be constructed. Approved for 344 s.f. Decrease of 344 s.f. 2. Deck “B” will be a screen porch. Approved for 84 s.f. Proposing 141 s.f. Increase of 57 s.f 3. Deck“C” Approved for 198 s.f Proposing 337 s.f Increase of 139 s.f The hardcover in the 0-75 ’ setback zone was approved at 4,413 s.f (15.3%). The new proposal reduces the hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone. It will decrease by 180 s.f to 4,233 s.f (15.0%), The lot coverage by structures was approved at 3,410 s.f (7.7%). The new proposal reduces the lot coverage by structures. It will decrease by 148 s.f to 3,262 s.f (7.4%). The location of the structure is what changes. The proposal incorporates more structure in the 0- 75' setback zone on the take side of the residence, rather than on the side of the residence further from the lake. (See Exhibit B). The proposed deck and screen porch are approximately 40' from the lake and are not the two story addition previously approved. The deck and screen porch do not affect any adjacent properties. The house and garage are both located in the 0-75' setback zone. The residence was built prior to current zoning standards. Statement of Hardship: The application should be asked for his testimony regarding this issue. Issues for Consideration: 1. The residence and garage are both located in the 0-75' setback zone. #01-2706 Richard and Jane Stark 813 Panenwood Variance Changes page 2 of3 i! I i; . , iki ■ -.as. A . T> . ~%f — 2. The residence was built prior to current zoning standards. 3. The new proposal does reduce the lot coverage by structures still well below the allowed 15%. 4. Hardcover in the 0-75* setback zone will decrease from the previous approval. 5. The screen porch and additional decking does increase the amount of structure towards the lake rather than on the side of the residence as previously approved. 6. Other issues raised by the Planning Conunission. Options for Action: 1. Recommend approval of variances. 2. Reconunend denial of variances, stating reasons. 3. Table, giving q;>plicant direction. 4. Other action. #01-2706 Richard and Jane Stark SIS Paitenwood Variance Changes page 3 of 3 ANALYSIS Lot Area: LR-IB Lot Area Required 43,560 s.f. (1 Acre) Actual 44,225 s.f. (1.02 Acre) Structural Coverage; Hardcover: 1 I'l lAiflih Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 44,225 s.f.2,520 s.f. (existing)5.7% 3,410 s.f. (approved)7.7% 3,262 s.f. (new proposal)7.4% Distance from Lakeshore Total Area in Setback Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Approved Hardcover New proposal 0-75'28,210 s.f.Os.f. (0%) 5,815 s.f. (20%) 4,413 s.f. (15.3%) 4,233 s.f. (15.0%) 75-200’15,419 s.f.3,854.75 s.f. (25%) 3,600 s.f. (23%) 3,600 s.f. (23%) 3,600 s.f. (23%) J csN /TV '**?!!.* t-;vAf»c»< u|h' i'-t.^: [j r* R 1' -.T' [> i - :. I • ‘: uV^ e.j. ,-t« REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: Name Wendy Bottenbcrg Title Zoning Adminstrator/Planner Item Description: Mll-2706 Richard & Jane Stark 815 Partenwood Road Variances DATE: 2/5/02 ITEM NO.: f Agenda Section: Zoning Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 Acre) 44,225 s.f. (1.02 acre) List of Exhibits: A Approved Plans B Proposed Plans C Resolution #4693 D Staff Report and Exhibits of 9/17/2001 Application Summary: The City Council adopted, on consent. Resolution No. 4693 for Richard and Jane Stark to grant the renewal of variances to permit construction of a four stall garage and additional living area to a one level residence at 815 Partenwood Road. The original variance was granted in 1997 and was renewed in 1998, 1999,2000 and 2001. Richard and Jane Stark bought the property in 2001 and were the owTiers when the variances were renewed in 2001. The applicants builder, Ron Lauer, applied for a building permit and when the plans were reviewed there was a conflict with the amoimt of hardcover in the 0-75’ setback zone versus the amount approved. The plans had a larger amount than the approved plan. The owner agreed to remove the excess hardcover. It was during these discussions which the property owners decided not to construct the addition on the east side of the residence. Instead, they proposed slightly larger decks and changing one of the decks into a screen porch, both are on the lakeside of the residence. The proposed changes are as follows: 1. Addition (“A”) on the east will be not be constructed. Approved for 301.5 s.f. Decrease of 301.5 s.f. 2. Deck “B” will be a screen porch. Approved for 84 s.f. Proposing 141 s.f. Increase of 57 s.f. 3. Deck“C” Approved for 198 s.f. Proposing 337 s.f. Increase of 139 s.f. The lot coverage by structures was approved at 3,410 s.f. (7.7%). The lot coverage by structures will decrease by 148 s.f. wth the new proposal. The new proposal meets the approved hardcover in the 0-75* setback zone. The location of the structure is what changes. The proposal incorporates more structure in the 0* 75' setback zone on the lake side of the residence, rather than on the side of the residence further fiom the lake. (See Exhibit B). The proposed deck and screen porch are approximately 40* from the lake and are not the two story addition previously approved. The deck and screen porch do not affect any adjacent properties. The house and garage are both located in the 0-75' setback zone. The residence was built prior to current zoning standards. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To direct staff regarding changes in application: 1. Bring resolution to next Council meeting reflecting changes to proposal; or 2. Refer back to Planning Commission for further review. \ ,^.^..4.. .. rL ♦• ft A .v.l I ^ikfobo Oi W /^ 4&" /^^^^^oncrete patio ^ ^ PROPOSED SCREEN----- PORCH bcac':~... ..-N 86«32*00” E 4«i .........Twni i^tr \ X- ” . / ^ kSTC //^/ \V - /?^ '. V o ISMPSTOW ••••7.........S^lv DRIVEWAY \ .X" \ \ tS^ *• .»n ••.• r ^ -V______________________________________________________________________________■ 1W —>■»': »f ■ » 1.«L c;' f tTir^ '------wm f V ^45^“ - ."'rs -T>r(iv; „.^1p Q^rriryit rti \ __________ ok^ //t'’ // . .4^ 0« V '1 f r •. ,■% •.-r- iM • ‘T l<!*.I • 1 \• <• • • ’. V ♦ • ■ •.ft'1^ 1 ti •m’% • A RESOLirriON GRANTING RENEWAL OF VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2 FILE NO. 01-2706 WHEREAS, Richard R. Stark and Jane M. Stark (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 815 Partenwood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lot 2, Block 2, Partenwood (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for the renewal of variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 to allow the remodeling and e.xpansion of the existing residence to include a four stall garage and additional living space located 34’ from the 929.4 ordinary high water mark where 75’ is required and requiring a hardcover variance of 4,413 s.f. (15.3%) where 5,815 s.f. (20%) is existing and none is allowed as shown on Exhibit A. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL\TD by the City Council of Orono, 1. 0 3. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #01-2706. The property- is located in the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring one acre in area. The property consists of 1.02 acre. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this renewal application on September 17, 2001 and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the follow-ing findings: 1. The proposed additions would not further encroach on the OHWL. Page 1 of 5 T= 2.The configuration of the lot severely restricts the allowable building pad. 3. The amount of hardcover in the O' to 75* lakeshorc setback would be reduced from 20% to 15.3%. 4.The City Council fmds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to It and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that grantmg the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air cor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merelv serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable h^dship or difficulty; is necessaiy to preserve a substaccal property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit acd mtent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendauons of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicMts and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safe^ and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereiv grants ymances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 to allou ih'e remodeling and expansion of the existing residence located 34* from the OHWL wh-re 7>’ is required and hardcover of 4.415 s.f. (15.3%) in the O' to 75' lakeshore setback where 5,815's.f (20%) IS existing and none is allowed. 1.All plastic under landscaping must be removed in the 0’ to 75’ lakeshore setback pnor to any new construction. 2. 3. No further variances will be granted to this property in the future. Authorities grated by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but we permissive only and must be exercised by application for a buildinz permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (September 24, 2002). Page 2 of 5 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. 6. Any substantial changes or revisions to the plan in Exhibit A will require reconsideration by the City Council. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Mirmesota at a regular meeting held on the 24th day of September, 2001. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24th day of September, 2001, by Barbara A. Peterson and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Mirmesota municipal corporation and said instrtunent was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) *s- COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared 2001, before .known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA. ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 2001, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared .known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 • •• ••• • • •«•«•••• ••••••••• ••••- • •••« mm • lA<e MTMeTO)«CA < I **s •sw MAN (ENTk'r ENTRY PLANTN6 AUGMENT SCRCiiN PLANTNG SCRVCE CNtPT A003ESS VVAU G>05TNG TREES TO REMAN Eall'U~l tn o t#s?£ 4MM ''ll III —i-1 ■' -i'~ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION FEB 2 5 2002 Cll V EJHUNO Department Approval: Name: Wendy Bottenberg Title: Zoning Adminstrator/Planner DATE: February 21,2002 ITEM NO.5* Item Description: #01-2709 Richard R. Shull 2285 French Lake Road Variance Review Zoning Dbtrict: RR-1B/PRD One Family Rural Residential District (2 acre) Council Action of February 11,2002: I he Council voted 3 to 0 to permit the property owners of 2285 French Lake Road to make the requested changes to their site plan and directed staff to draft a resolution for adoption at the February 25,2002 meeting. Review: The City Council adopted, on consent. Resolution No. 4695 for Richard and Anne Shull to grant variances to permit construction of a two stall garage and a new entr> w ay to an existing one level residence at 2285 French Lake Road . The garage and entry way addition are within 150' ot French Lake, a Natural Environment lake. The applicants builder applied for a building permit. The garage and entry way were different square footage than what was approved. A floor to ceiling bay window was also added. The garage, entry way and bay window are all located in the 0-75' setback zone. The hardcover is increasing from what was approved but still less than what currently exists. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution. L. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16(C)(1), SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (CK6), SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION I6(L)(I); FILE NO. 01-2709 WHEREAS. Richard R. Shull and Anne M. Shull (hereinafter "the applicants") are the oNVTiers of the property located at 2285 French Lake Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lot 4, Block 1. and Outlet C, Johnston's French Lake Second Addition. Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter “the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C)(1) to permit structure within 150' of a Natural Environment Lake. Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(L)( 1) to permit 3,830.25 s.f. (23.5%) of hardcover in 0-75' setback area where 4,381 s.f. (26.9%) exists and 0 s.f. (0%) is allowed and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(C)(6) to permit the encroachment of 50' and 75' into the average lakeshore setback for construction of a three stall garage to the east end of the residence, a new entry way over existing steps and a cantilevered bay window. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: 1<1ND1NGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #01-2709. The property is located in the RR-IB, Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District, where 2 acres is the minimum lot area. The property consists of approximately 1.5 acres. The City Council approved Resolution No. 4695 for variances to permit a two stall garage and entry way to the existing residence. Page 1 of 5 ----------- 5. 6, The property owner made chang**s to the approved site plan, and City Council approved the revised plan on February' 11,2002. This resolution supersedes Resolution No. 4695. The City Council finds that the conditions e.visting on this property' are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire ha/iird or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the Citv. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipa. Zoning Code Section 10.56. Subdivision 16 (CK1) to permit structure within 150' of a Natural llnv iionment l.ake. Section 10.56. Subdivision 16(L)(l) to pjermit 3.830.25 s.f (23.5%) of hardcover in 0-75' setback area where 4,381 s.f. (26.9%) e.xists and 0 s.f. (0%) is allowed and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(C)(6) to permit the encroachment of 50' and 75' into the average lakeshore setback for construction of a ihree stall garage to the east end of the residence, a new eniryway over existing steps and a cantilevered bay window. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants. Page 2 of 5 ^ .-V . - . ■ I ii i III 1 but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a budding permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire or. that date (February 25,2003). 3.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of! itle of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of Februaiy', 2002. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, Cit> Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HEN'NEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day of February, 2002 by Barbara A. Peterson and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City, Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Page 3 of 5 On this day of. for said County, personally appeared 2002, before me a Notary Public within and known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this _day of.., 2002, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 ofS f . f I ? f 5 yV * I* jl . k I i , 1 . y Q> OQ O t-n Met-O pmpsfcl ptxo GcOtci^ - ^ 53''4^ E k +y ^ - g'x-ic.' \WirY(oi.O' •iUMdiiilWliiittaliL.kl M-1 £> REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: Name Wendy Bottcnbcrg Title Assistant Zoning Adminstrator/Planner DATE: 2/4/02 ^ ITEM NO.: 3 Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #01-2709 Richard R. Shull 2285 French Lake Road Variances Zoning Dutrict: Lot Area: RR-IB/PRD One Family Rural Residential District (2 acre) 65,261 s.f. (1.5 acres) List of Exhibits: A B C D E F Letter from Property Owners (Jan 31,2002) Hardcover calculation revisions Approved Plans Resolution #4695 Proposed Plans Staff Report and Exhibits of 9/1 7/01 Summary of Request: The City Council adopted, on consent. Resolution No. 4695 for Richard and Anne Shull to grant variances to permit construction of a two stall garage and a new entry way to an existing one level residence at 2285 French Lake Road. The garage and entry way addition are within 150' of French Lake, a Natural Environment lake. The lot was developed in 1979 prior to adoption of the Shoreland Ordinance (1992). The Shoreland Ordinance created a 150' structure setback from French Lake, whereas only a 26' wetland setback was required prior to 1992. French Lake was considered as merely a wetland before it was re-designated as a Natural Environment Lake by the Shoreland Ordinance. The ordinance was adopted by Council with the understanding it would create non-conforming lots in the French Creek Subdivision. The applicants residence currently encroaches into the required 150* setback. The applicants builder. Bob Boyer, applied for a building permit. The garage and entry way on the plans were larger than what was approved. Also, different is a floor to ceiling bay window. The garage, entry way and bay window are all located in the 0-75' setback zone. The 0-75' setback hardcover is increasing from what was approved but still less than what currently exists. The following changes were noted on the plans submitted. Approved garage - 24' x 24'. Proposed garage - 24' x 32'. Approved Entry way - 7' x 11 ’. Proposed Entry way - 8' x 16'. i \ 4 Total increase - 243 s.f. And: Bay Window - 6 •/,’ x 2 = 16.25 s.f. (From floor to ceiling*hardcover in 0-75' and lot coverage by structures.) > ' Total increase » 259.25 s.f Exhibit B shows the new proposed hardcover calculations. The applicants are proposing to remove 550.75 s.f of hardcover from the 0-75' setback zone, 31 s.f. from 75-250' setback zone for a total 581.75 s.f from the property. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The applicants will still be reducing hardcover on the property. The proposed changes are minor and will not affect adjacent neighbors. Staff recommends approval of the proposed changes. Staff will bring a resolution reflecting the changes to the February 25,2002 Council meeting. Optionally, Council could refer this back to the Planning Commission if Council feels the revisions need further review. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Grant conceptual approval of the revised plan and direct staff to bring a revised resolution to the February 25,2002 meeting for adoption. i RICHARD R SHULL 208 North Barry Ava* Whyzata, MN 58301 Orono City City Hall Attn. Wandy Bottonbarg Asst Zoning Adminiatral Item: «01>2709 Richard R. Shun 2285 French Lake Road Variances Feb. 4,2002 r/Planner The City council approved our request for variance on 9/24/01 according toa floor plan we presented at the time. Since then we have made some revisions to the size of the new garage and the front entry. As a resutt, we need to ask for a new variance for this project in order to get a building permit The garage wes to have been 24’ x 24’ and we would like it to be 24’ x 32’. The front entry was to have been r x 11 ’ and we vaxild like it to be 8’ x 16'. This is a total increase of 243 square feet (192 s.f. of garage and 51 s.f. of entry). The proposed floor plan accompanies this request In the 0-75 ’ setback zone we would like to have 3.814 s.f. of hard cover where 4,381 s.f. exists. And in the 75-250 ’ setback zone, we would like to have 7601 s.f. \rhere 7,632 s.f. exists. This change would still yield a total hardcover reduction of 598 s.f. from what exists today. Please let me know when and how we should proceed to get an approval on this request We would like to get a building permit through Bob Boyer Bldg. Co. as soon as possible. a ^ It id? ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Lot Area: Structural Coverage: Hardcover Calculations: RR-IB/PRD Lot Area Required PRD Actual 65,261 s.f. Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage 65,261 s.f.Allowed: 9,789 s.f. (15%) Existing: 2,571 s.f. (4%) Approved: 3,227s.f. (4.9%) Proposed: 3243.25 s.f. (4.97%) Distance to Shoreline Total area in setback Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Approved Hardcover Proposed Hardcover 0-75 ’16,276 s.f.0 s.f.4,381 s.f. (26.9%) 3,622 s.f. (22.25%) 3830.25 s.f. (23.5%) Reduction 75-250'48,985 s.f.12,246.3 s.f. (25%) 7,632 s.f. (22.25%) 7,550 s.f. (15.41%) 7,601 s.f. (15.5%) Reduction 'M' .: • ^V. --7- cueeeur SarBACK 160' IftUMtt 1i 1 Homm 1141 111#liii • 1 ConcraM llOtf 111#Iff r itemMOM Oil#hlS#401 1 « 0«k 70 4 0#7*f r JJ4 ______0#«• MW J fill#IUll»> ■wiatiwpiiinfci i HOWM CiMlV 11271 a C«nom llOtf Iff 1 :rmv ifSl» « OmM Tit ^0#HIr 21#0#'Hiuu# 1 ItMiii IM71 •* r .1’••••• ;r50* FRENCH LAKE (SOUTH ' ON 8-6-01 930.0 lewort iy\H6 #2v09 SAii// Residinci Remodeling Ac Addiuwn Variance Request French Lake Road Oronoi Minnesota & 9L%€k€MiU Atdmttu Gc<scsc^ - |^\\v^ulKl^ ' 'I * y ^' ■ llT- fO ^esBo; GlTYofORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.___4 605^ A RESOLimON GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C)(1), SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C)(6), SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (LKl): FILE NO. 01-2709 WHEREAS, Richard R. Shull and Anne M. Shull (hereinafter "the applicants") are the o^vne^s of the property located at 2285 French Lake Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lot 4, Block 1, and Outlot C, Johnston*s French Lake Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter “the property ’’); and • WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C)(1) to permit structure within 150* of a Natural Enviroiunent Lake, Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(L)(1) to permit 3,622 s.f. (22.25%) of hardcover in 0-75' setback area where 4,381 s.f. (26.9%) e.xists and 0 s.f. (0%) is allowed and Section 10.56, Subdi\*ision 16(C)(6) to permit the encroachment of 50' and 75’ into the average lakeshore setback for cor struction of a two stall garage to the east end of the residence and a new entryway over exist!., j steps. WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Conunission held a public hearing on September 17,2001, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this ^plication were given the opportunity to speak thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #01-2709. Page 1 of 5 '• A U\1 GITYofORONO £SH^ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4695, 2. 3. 5. 6. The proper^ is located in the RR-IB, Single Family Rural Residential Zoning DistricL where 2 acres is the minimum lot area. The property consists of approximately l.S acres. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 17,2001 and recommended approval by a vote of 7 to 0. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. The 150' Natural Environment lake setback was adopted after the residence was built. B Hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone will decrease to 3,622 s.f. (22.25%) from 4,381 s.f (26.9%). . C. The structural coverage on the property will be 4.9%, below the allowed 15%. D.Encroachment into the average lakeshore setback will not adversely affect the neighboring property ’ views. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Plaiming Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 5 GITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Mn 4 B 0 5 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C)(1) to permit structure within 150' of a Natural Environment Lake, Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(L)(I) to permit 3,622 s.f. (22.25%) of hardcover in 0-75 ’ setback area where 4,381 s.f. (26.9%) exists and 0 s.f. (0%) is allowed and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(C)(6) to permit the encroachment of 50' and 75' into the average lakeshore setback for construction of a two stall garage to the east end of the residence and a new entryway over existing steps. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants attached to this resolution as E.xhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2.Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (September 24,2002). 3.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 24th day of September, 2001. ATTEST:La f 1 a . V Liiida S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner (s) Page 3 of 5 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL .an 4695 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24 th day of September, 2001 by Barbara A. Peterson and Linda S. Vee. Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of. for said County, personally appeared ., 2001, before me a Notary Public within and ___________________________known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of. and for said County, personally appeared 2001, before me a Notary Public within known to me to be the person(s) described in and who e.xecuted the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 itfitolintiilnirtlfciriiraffitHilti...... V * • • •? y ICS 1 ____111-1 __________^ — ""I oecK .ta*' IMWft rin# OMit TuMif * I srcPFtc SIOICS «F»c? r,vz%*\ ;.>»< M4! MMif« • • .•• •• BM ^ • M ^ ••l•••7^» O RENCH LAKE (SOUTH BASIN) 0^' e-6-01 930.0 11 j) r / '*;wn\n </ ^J M Shull Kiiuknct Kciiiuilcling fc AUJition Variance Request French Lake Road OronOf Minnesota liAfto O Bm€ktMik Mttmu 'S ■a ____it- I u, ? •« "S;! 5 __ Cr(\.ir^c\C, Bo-c.^ Wi»^ovO G »v+»^ ptxo (3cX>t£^ - 3^' tK+yt^ - ^3ol,v^ \)Uii\:^otO“ o? ./■ *»■ "> ■r ’ Applicatioo Date Completion Date: 60 Day Deadline: 8/22/01 8/22/01 10/19/01 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: Name Wendy Bottenberg Title Assistant Zoning Adminstrator/Planner DATE: 9/24/01 ITEM NO.: 7 Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#01-2709 Richard R. Shull 2285 French Lake Road Variances Zoning District: Lot Area: RR-1B.TRD One Family Rural Residential District (2 acre) 65,261 s.f. (1.5 acres) List of Exhibits: A Resolution B Staff Report and Exhibits of 9/17/01 Application Summary*: The applicant is seeking approval to construct a two stall garage (S76 s.f.) to the east end of the residence and a new entry-way (80 s.f) over existing steps. Both the addition and entry way are within 150' of a Natural Environment lake. The proposed garage will be located over existing driveway. The applicant is proposing to remove approximately 800 s.f of driveway that will no longer be needed. The existing garage will be turned into a screen porch, office, laundry room and storeroom. The lot was developed in 1979 prior to the adoption of the Shoreland Ordinance (1992). The Shoreland Ordinance created a 150' structure setback from French Lake, whereas only a 26’ wetland setback was required before 1992. French Lake was considered as merely a wetland before it was redesignated as a Natural Environment Lake by the Shoreland Ordinance. The ordinance was adopted by Council with the understanding it would create non-conforming lots in the French Creek Subdivision. The subject property owner ’s house now encroaches into the required 150' setback. 1. Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C)( 1): Structural setbacks for Natural Environmental Lakes( 150'): To permit an addition to the east end of the residence and an entry way over existing steps. 2. Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L)(l): Hardcover in 0-75 ’: To allow 3,622 s.f (22.25%) of hardcover where 4,381 s.f (26.9%) exists and 0 s.f or 0 % is allowed. 3. Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(C)(6); Average Lakeshore Setback: To allow the additions to the residence to encroach 50' and 75' into the average lakeshore setback. PLANNING CO\LMISS:ONi The Plarming Commission recommended by a 7 to 0 vote to: Approve the application as presented. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the enclosed resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution. ' ' f * • 1 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (CKl), SECTION 10J6, SUBDIVISION 16 (CK6), SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L)(l); FILE NO. 01-2709 WHEREAS, Richard R. Shull and Anne M Shull (hereinafter "the applicants'*) are the owner’s of the property located at 2285 French Lake Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lot 4, Block l,and Outlot C, Johnston ’s French Lake Second Addition, Hennepin County, Miimesota (hereinafter “the property ’’); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C)(1) to permit structure within 150' of a Natural Environment Lake, Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(L)(1) to permit 3,622 s.f. (22.25%) of hardcover in 0*75' setback area where 4,381 s.f. (26.9%) exists and 0 s.f. (0%) is allowed and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(C)(6) to permit the encroachment of 50’ and 75' into the average lakeshore setback for construction of a two stall garage to the east end of the residence and a new entryway over existing steps. WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 17,2001, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. Mirmesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #01-2709. Page 1 of S 2. 3. 5. 6. The property is located in the RR-IB, Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District, where 2 acres is the minimum lot area. The property consists of approximately 1.5 acres. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 17,2001 and recommended approval by a vote of 7 to 0. 4. The Plaiuiing Commission made the following findings of fact: A.The 150' Natural Environment lake setback was adopted after the residence was built. B. Hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone will decrease to 3,622 s.f. (22.25%) from 4,381 s.f. (26.9%). . C. The structural coverage on the property will be 4.9%, below the allowed 15%. D. Encroachment into the average lakeshore setback will not adversely affect the neighboring property views. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessaty to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of5 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (CX1) to permit structure within 150* of a Natural Environment Lake, Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(LX1) to permit 3,622 s.f. (22.25%) of hardcover in 0-75' setback area where 4,381 s.f. (26.9%) exists and 0 s.f. (0%) is flowed and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(CX6) to permit the encroachment of 50* and 75* into the average lakeshore setback for construction of a two stall garage to the east end of the residence and a new entryway over existing steps. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. Authorities grant.-d by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (September 24,2002). 3.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 24th day of September, 2001. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner (s) Page 3 of5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24th day of September, 200 1 by Ba^ara A. Pete^n and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notaiy Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. ) On this day of. for said County, personally appeared , 2001, before me a Notary Public within and knoNvn to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. ) On this day of. and for said County, personally appeared _, 2001, before me a Notaiy Public within known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notaiy Public Page 4 of 5 . •■Mrr.r r^n. r '■^f-'K.' i»4^'VIJiL i u\He n ''.wQ 5//u// RetUUnce Reinuileling & AdJicion Variance Request French Lake Road OronOi Minnesota iAtpmt Ulmt9 €t fLmktsttli uau AppIkatloB Date: DcadUac: 11/lS/Dl 3/16/02 fc»cf:T\NG FEB 2 5 2002 cut or OHONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: February !9,2002 ITEM NO. DepartBMBt Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator Adniaislrator Reviewed:Agenda Sectioa: Zoning Item Description://01-2730 Ace Properties 3375 Crystal Bay Road Variances LR-IC One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1/2 acre)Zoning District: List of Exhibits A Resolution B Site Plan Application: On February 11,2002 Council conceptually approved variances for construction ofa new home on the property by a vote of 3 to 0. The attached resolution has been amended to add findings to support the variances to permit a 9.7* side yard setback for the house, and a rear setback for a bay. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt the attached resolution approving variances. The Resolution approves the variances to lot area, lot width, 0-75 hardcover, 75-250 hardcover, side setback and rear yard setback. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (B); SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2; SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) 1 AND 2 FILE NO. 01-2730 WHEREAS, Ace Properties, (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 3375 Crystal Bay Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lot 5, Wallace’s Addition to Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit construction of a new residence on a property with a lot size of 6,690 s.f. (.15 acre) where 21,780 s.f. ('A acre) is required, lot width of 50 ’ where 100 ’ is required, and to permit a 19 ’ rear setback where 30' is required and a 9.7' side yard setback where 10 ’ is required; Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) 1 and 2 to permit 748 s.f. (23.8%) hardcover in the 0-75’ setback where no hardcover is allowed and 2,062 s.f. (53.4%) hardcover in the 75-250’ setback where 934 s.f. (25%) is allowed; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 19,2001 and continued the hearing to January 22, 2002, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1 . This application was reviewed as Zoning File #01 -2730. Page 1 of 7 2. 4. The property is located in the LR-IC, Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District where '/j acre is the minimum lot size and 100 feet is the minimum lot width. 3. The existing property is 6,690 s.f. (.15 acre) and has a 50' lot width. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 22,2002 and recommended approval of variances by a vote of 6 to 0 based on the following findings of fact: A. The property was platted and developed prior to the adoption of the current zoning standards. The plat of Wallace's Addition was recorded in 1908. B.The lot is separated from the lakeshore by Crystal Bay Road, a publically maintained road. The 600 s.f. paved surface area of the roadway is deducted from the lot area of the property and the 0-75* lakeshore setback. C.The total property located outside of the 75' lakeshore setback is 3,855 s.f., and the depth of the property from the edge of bituminous roadway to the rear property line averages 120 s.f. The total depth of the property from the 75' setback to rear property line averages 80'. D.The existing house and attached concrete storage building is 1,946 s.f The last building permit issued for the property was for the storage building in 1971. More recent ordinances were adopted for structural lot coverage to limit structural massing on properties, and to preserve open space between buildings. Additional structure also contributes towards additional hardcover w hich can negati v ely impact water quality by not allowing storm water to run across natural ground surface. The concept is to allow storm water to be slowed and to infiltrate into the ground. Municipal Code permits up to 15% of a lot to be dedicated to structural improvements. The total structural improvements are allowed to be greater than 15% on properties with a lot area of less than 10,000 s.f On properties less than 10,000 s.f, the total structure allowed on the property is 1,500 s.f Page 2 of 7 * r^.i >.1. k ■! 5. 6. 7. 8. The City does not normally look favorably on variances to the structural lot coverage limitation, especially on properties less than 10,000 s.f. in size. To place a 1,500 s.f. house on the property and maintain required lakeshore setbacks, a rear yard setback is required. The property located behind the subject property is guided for a future trail corridor and has been used as a rail corridor for many years. This property does not abut another residential property to the rear. Crystal Bay Road is located only 10' from the lakeshore of Lake Minnetonka. The road is a public road that is owned and maintained by the City of Orono. To provide access to the property, a driveway must be located in the 0-75' lakeshore setback. The property owners have designed a minimum sized driveway that will provide adequate access to the two stall garage. Council finds that the design of a 50' X 30' house allow s the property to develop to 1,500 s.f. The location of a house 30' wide has caused the building to encroach slightly into the side yard setbacks. If the house were reduced in width to maintain a building size of 1,500 s.f it would require a greater rear yard setback. The proposed house is located at the setback of the e.xisting house on the lot. The house has a FFli of 945.8'. The house is designed to match the e.xisting topography of the lot. If the house were moved closer to the rear property line the house would begin to move into the hillside, as the ground elevation begins to sharply rise to the future trail corridor. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and w ould be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 3 of 7 9.The City Council has considered this application includ ng the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit construction of a new residence on a property with a lot size of 6,690 s.f. (.15 acre) where 21,780 s.f ('/z acre) is required, a lot width of 50 ’ where 100 ’ is required, to permit a 19' rear setback where 30 ’ is required and a 9.7 ’ side setback where a 10 ’ setback is required: Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) 1 and 2 to permit 748 s.f (23.8%) hardcover in the 0-75 ’ setback where no hardcover is allowed and 2,062 s.f (53.4%) hardcover in the 75-250 ’ setback where 934 s.f (25%) is allowed subject to the following conditions: 1.Final drainage plans shall be reviewed by the City Engineer to ensure drainage is properly directed. 2.The property shall be developed in conformance with the site plan attached as Exhibit A. 3.Authorities granted by the variances run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or these variances will expire on that date (February 11,2003). 4.V iolation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of the variances shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5.The undersigned ow ners have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property . Page 4 of 7 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 11th day of February, 2002. ATfEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Representativc(s) of Ace Properties STATE OF MINNESOTA COLFNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 11th day of February, 2002 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN day ofThe foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _______ , 200 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page S of 7 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of .. 20_ personally appeared before me, ____who is personally known to me ____ whose identity I proved on the basis of whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation witness , a credible and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/thcir free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of ,20 personally appeared before me, ____ who is personally known to me ____ whose identity I proved on the basis of whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation witness a credible and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public Page 6 of 7 _ _^. Exhibit A CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FDR ACE PROPERTIES □F LOT 15, WALLACE'S ADDITION TD MINNETONKA BEACH HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LAKE. iirsKi—i—t* ly \•IIKNE TDi''iK A CRYSTAL BAY 989.4 CONTOUR Ltl N — PROPOSED ELCVATIDNS i 1) Corto* ■ 939£ 2) First floor ■ 948.2 NQTCi Propostd house grooles outskie tinof touKdIny to f*atch tMlstlng Qrodtf to preserve sane drainage pattern. «M7J» LEGAL DESCRIPTIDN DF PRgMISgS i Lot 15, WALLACE'S ADDITION TO MINNETONKA BEACH cmo AV % o • denotes Iron narker (908.3)denotes existing spot elevotion, neon sea level datun 904i6 denotes proposed spot elevation, nean sea level datum 117 ■ » <<enotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. 9 TNs survey Intends to show tne boundaries of the above described property, and the proposed location of a proposed house thereon. It does not purport to show ony other Inprovenents or encroachments Cfl I hereby cer BERG t ASSB»A^ ENGINEERS, UMO SURVC y 26S ILLOV DRIVE UMC Lm|e . MN. SS396 998-473-4141 that this survey was prepared by me o4 fr onl tlfy th< ^ registered Ovft Engineer lark t. (ironberg »innesota License Muf^Ktr un< Lot •veyor lATC 2-11-02 M ; super' under 02-046 Poge 7 of 7 CERTIFICATE DF SURVEY FOR ' 1 t ' ' I •' L ' I ' 'H ^ L ’ ■ _ I L X I i OF LOT 15, WALLACE'S ADDITION TO MINNETONKA BEACH HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA L AKx 929.4 CONTOUR Lt CRYSTAL r.NLlTGi^iK-:^ BAY N —- PROPOSED CLCVATIONS i 1> CArag« ■ 9392 B) rir*t floor ■ 940.2 of to notch oidotlng Qrodtf to presorvo sono drolnoot potttrn. NOrCi Proposed house grodes outside t mfm LEGAL PeSCRIPTIDN OF PREMISES i Lot IS. WALLACE'S ADDITION TO NIfM:TONKA BEACH ^v■ o • denotes Iron norker (908.3)denotes existing spot elevation, neon seo level datufi 904i6 denotes proposed spot elevotlon, neon seo level da tun • "denotes existing contour line, nean sea level datun Bearings shown are based upon an assuned datun. V c ■ ‘ This survey Intends to show the boundaries of the above descri>ed property, and the proposed location of a proposed house thereon. It does not purport to show any other Inprovenents or encroachnents I hereby cer GpeXBERG & ASSBGM^ injirMi CNCINCCRS, LAND SURVCv2fiS"m ILLQV DRIVE LONG LAR 9S2-473-4I41 tlfy that this survey was prepared by ne oi ,h4NCs" a duly re^tered QvA Enghnieer an Minnesota. E. Ifi 353S6 lark $. Gronberg Mkineaota License super* veyor BSTC 2-11-02 27S#2-^ 02-040 ,a. Complete Date: 1/23/02 60 Day Deadliae: 3/20/02 FEB 2 5 2002 CITY OH ORONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: February 20.2002 ITEM NO.: ~7 Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#02-2746 Mark Finney 3210 North Shore Drive Variances Zoning District: List of Exhibits LR-IC - Single Family Lakeshore Residential District A Plat Map B Site Plan C Floor Plans/Elevation Views Application Applicant has requested variances to permit construction of a lakeside deck, a IS' X 10' screen porch, and a 1,164 s.f. two-story addition to the house. The residential addition would contain a garage, 3 bedrooms, bathrooms and utility room. A variance is required to permit the addition to encroach 6' into the I O' side yard setback requirement. A variance is also required to permit an alteration to e.xisting non-conforming hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback. Required variances: I. 2. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision I6(L)(2). Total proposed hardcover e.xceeds allowed hardcover by 1.249 s.f. 75-250 Lot Area= 10,355 s.f; Existing Hardcover = 5,85 1 s.f. (56.5%) Proposed Hardcover = 3,838 s.f. (37%) Allowed Hardcover = 2,589 s.f. (25%) Section 10.24, Subdivision S (B) To permit a 4' side setback for the residential addition. The existing house is set back 7.4' from the property line. The required setback is 10'. #02-2746 Mark Finney 3210 North Shore Drive Page 2 of 3__________ Setback Variance - Addition The existing house on the property is located adjacent to the North Shore Marina which does have two buildings used for storage and customer use Just across the property line. The addition, located only 4' from the property line, would leave a 10.8' separation between the Marina building and the house. This does meet the required setback distance between buildings. However, the 4' property setback is closer to the property line than the existing house setback of 7.4*. The house is situated on the property' so the comer of the house located near the lake is 7.4' and the comer towards the street is 8.0' from the property line. The City of Orono has tried to require new constmction, additions and new buildings meet minimum requirements when possible. The setbacks not only provide additional space between buildings, but also leave additional land area for proper drainage systems. 1'his is especially important on lakeshore lots. Detached Garage The proposed detached garage shown on the survey is drawn at a size of 32' X 24'. A building of that size would be required to meet a minimum setback of 15' to a property line. The applicant has stated he is willing to construct a building 30' X 24' building which is a structure under 750 s.f., thus only requiring a I O' setback. The detached garage is intended for storage and would not have a driveway. A garage door would be located on the east side of the building. Hardcover As a result of the proposed plan the total hardcover on the property would be reduced. There is currently a large gravel driveway and parking area on the property that would be removed for the new driveway and garage addition. The total hardcover is still over the 25% limitation in the 75-250' lakeshore setback requiring the variance. Total hardcover would be reduced by a total of 2,013 s.f. Additional hardcover removal includes removal of the existing detached garage and driveway. The existing garage and drive are shown on the attached survey/site plan. Applicant has also agreed to locate the driveway to not be within 5' of the property line. Applicant’s Statement of Hardship Refer to Exhibit A. (Summary Below) 1. Existing house is inside the setback and the attached garage will line up in the same area. 2. I'he property is located next to a marina. The addition would help to screen the boat yard from the property. The lot is narrow and long. By locating the addition in the side setback it would leave yard space east of the house. The existing garage would be removed out of the 75-250' setback and a new garage would be constmeted in the 250-500' setback. 3. 4. #02-2746 Mark Finney 3210 North Shore Drive PMC 3 of 2---------------- Staff RecoaiaendatioB Staff ftcommends the addition be shifted to meet at least a minimum setback to match the existing setback of the house. The existing house is not parallel with the property line. The exterior wall moves further from the property line as the house distance increases from the lakeshore. Staff can support the hardcover variance if the side setback is increased. Total hardcover in the 7S-2S0' setback is being reduced from 5.851 s.f. (56.5%) to 3,838 s.f. (37%). Planalna Commlsakm Recomwendatioii Planning Commission voted 6 to 0 to recommend approval of the application. The recommendation included the following three points. I. The house addition must match the 8' existing setback of the house. 2. Detached garage must be redesigned to have a building size of 750 s.f. or less, 3. All hardcover proposed for removal shall be removed. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED The applicant may want to discuss the Planning Commission recommendation that the addition must meet an 8' setback rather than 4' as requested in the application. Staff is requesting Council direct staff to draft a resolution for adoption on March 11,2002. ■ “-------^ .t..-Ur . B o«- ni- . •infonM ‘'v • • .. ...>vSv K .. .. -rv> Houm. Niimbflf »10^ ■'.ts ??5ir-’'*‘.Straff Nam«.NOIITI| '-vUphiii tt/iot»l»gafhf t9eordtdmap. HrtpnifitnUac from Ofy, County, ondStalonadoulhoiMi ,j i. o Ofnoltt iron momirntfit Pf^rif D^Mcription That port of th§ west 57.3 feet of the east 115.05 feet of Coeemment Lot I, Section Township 117, Range 23, f^g north of a tine drown westertypass at right angle titrough the east line of sold 57.3 feet, to a point distant 165 feet north of its intersecrian with the northerly line of \ydiord*s Pork*, Lake Minnetortka. Together with an easement for drive woy ^mttt over and across (hot port of Iht «os( to feet of the east 67.75 feet of said Government Lot f. lying between tho sooth line of the above described property and the northerly right-of-way line of County Rood No. 51. House DdSHNC HAMOCOICIV 0^75 ZONC 0 SO. ft. 0 SO. n. Orh^Grovel 0 SO. fT, Total HefOcovof 0 SO. ft, Totet area 4.506 SO. ft. PertoM of Coverage 0,0% OnSTOtO NSPOCOVCT 75-230 ZON€ Corogo 642 SO. PT. Ohvo/Grovol 4.436 SO. FT. Totol Hardcover 5.831 SO. FT. Total Afoo I0.J55 SO. FT. FtrctoC of Coverage 56.5X extSTiMC HARDCOVER 250-500 /PNC “■"T^’TorTr. 0 so. FT. 1.167 so. FT. 1.167 SO. FT. 5.920 SO. FT. 19.7M To 929.4 Contour House Corogo Orive/Crovol Total Hardcover Total Area Percent of Coverage PROPOSiO HAROCONCR 0-75 20N€ House 0 SO* 2* Garage 0 SO. FT. Dnve/Crovel 0 SO. FT. Total Hardcover 0 SO. FT. Totol Area 4,506 SO. FT. Percent of Coverage O.OX PROPOSCO HARDCOvat 75-250 20N€ House/Corage 2,134 SO. FT. Oeck/Porch 615 SO. FT. Drive/Crovel 1,099 SO. FT. Total Hardcover 3,836 SO. FT. Totol Area 10,355 SO. FT. Percent of Coverage 37. IX PROPOSED MAPOCQVrW 250-500 ZQNC Hrufe 0 SC. FT. Goroge 766 SO. FT. Dhve/Cravel 1,010 SO. FT. Total Hardcover 1,778 SO. FT. Totol Area 5,920 SO. FT, Percent of Coverage 30.0X To 929.4 Contour O dom iMrffa URTMt C:\iP\0RAMf\7O t06.dwg Carift 442 $a rr. OrM/Crawff 4.0# SO. rr. fofof Hortfcovcr 5.B5I so. FT, refol Atm 10,355 50, FT. Ptrctfil 0/ Cowffog#565X CXISfMC NMOCOVfR 250-900 70MC Moiim 0 SO. FT, C0fO9«0 SO, FT. 0rh9/CfQ¥9i 1,157 SO, FT. Toid Moftfcovtr 1,157 SO. FT. fofol Vto 5,920 SO. FT. Parcanl of Co¥trag€I9.7X pwposco NMocovcn 0-23 row HoutO .0 SO. fT. 09fog€0 SO. FT. Driv^/Groiftl 0 SO. rr. Tq9oI Nordcovar 0 SO. rr. Tofof Aroo 4.50# so. rr. Ptrc«n( of Co¥trog9 o.ox PROf>OS€0 HAR0C0y€f9 75-250 ZONC Houw/Corog^2,134 so. FT. Ch€k/Pofch 515 SO. FT, CV^/Crovof 1.009 SO. FT. Totot Nordcortf 3.030 SO FT, fotol AffO J0.J53 SO FT. P«fC«o( of Coveroyt 37.1% PROPOStO HARDCOVIR 250-500 ZONl ^ruf^0 sc. ti. Corag9 7M SO. n Ohvt/Crovtl t.010 so. n. Told Mordcovtf 1.220 so. FT. Tolol Aroo 5.920 SO. rr. Pffctfll of Covfro^o JO.OX • . i i i i 1 i I ! i t 1 i ;i i i M i 1 i i !i 1 '‘ 1 i ' t ! 1 1 s 1__i__!__!__i ! • ♦ : ( 1 (1 . » t i ‘1 ! ; 1 1 i • 1 !! i 1 1 > 1 ! > ! ! i : . . ■ ^ I ! 1 i A I I ! I I i I I 1 \i I i ^ i ' ! ! i * 1 j i ^ ^ i i ' > ‘ I ' 1 i ^ 1 1 ' i1 ' ! 1 1 I ! ' i 1 ' 1 ! ! ; ! ■ 1 •: ! ! ! 1 1 1 ^ 4 1»i i M i M ! 1 1 !S3 r I 1 '' i i ' I1 ! ! 1 i i 1 ; i i • t . f i ! i i ! ! i i M 1 ( • 1 f •i •i 1 i !i 1 1 ! i ! f 1 i t » - • i i 1 I > ! ‘ ! 1 : t 1 1 ! ' 1 • 1 k : i f 1i ii L i I 1 i i M M ! i ; 1 i i ! 1 ! > M |€r-r \3^r\ !i 1 1 I I ! i ! ! ! ! ! i ' i i ■ 1 ! ; ! i 1 ! ! 1 i ! i i i '• i ! 1 ! ! i 1 i i i 1 ! i i 1 1 ! 1 ! : 1 M i i ! i ! 1 j ! 1 1 i i ; ! i 1 i •Mi ! i t i : ! ' i !^ ? i ! ! : : 1 i i ‘ * 1 ‘ ' • J : • .. ■ * ■ i 1 : - 3 • 1 ! N KM 1 1S No V \i 1 V k s 1 N y •i 1 K T y]1 N j y X ‘ • 1 » « « 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ______y< y 1 i > 1 K1 • 1 1 ( t 1 I i i 1 y Z'♦ IX'i 1 K'1 i n 1 : 1 i III •1 1 y'U Kyi '1 rvi jy i 1 1 1 W i \y X i IX 1 1 1 1 \ 91 1 yH !IX ux:L_;;;];;s k i i 1 i y 1 i i ! X1 k. I 1 i i 1•1 11 1 1t 1 >/!• ( 1 ! 1 1 ^ fl i ^X i t f 1 1 ! 1 J ' T ’ > ! ! 'i' < * ' ! • ! 1 ; j i 1 . i ieie 1 I % I i I ! I I 1 * < i ! T----r I I i I I • '__I i 1 11♦! i 1 1 ! r ‘ 1 y'!y 1 ! !i !! I 1 » i 1 1 ; •1 i !i 1 L_1 __ 11• , (1 1• I 1♦ 1 J 1 1 1 ! i '1 I ; i !! ! 1 1 t 1 :I 1 J ! 1 i 1 1 i t ! L t 1 . < ; «• { 1i » ! i i 1 ! : 1 1 !1 I! i i i ! i i i iHi i i ! 1 i ____I I I I ! ! i 1 i 7T ' " . . “ • 1 i • t 1 i . »-tf i 1 '\/^ ! ! V :♦ ill' |) • ! 1 i i I r~y<?"n ; ; ; i < > . 1 ■■ ! ' i i : * i - ! . : 1 (: M \\:' ! ' 1 i , 1 i ' S 1 i 1 ! 1 !it ii 1 i ♦ •V j : i \\, ' i i i ' ^! M , xl M I • i 1 i » I ' i »f I !n ! i i i = 1 j^! 1 1 J i 1 i ! U»L ! t ! i i V i i 1 \ \ I i ! i ! !'n M 1 , i ;1 !! i i M 1 i ! 1 1 1 1 I i 1 t ! ; i 'i ! 1 1 0 ' '-I f V—■ I 1 : 1 : -____________^^_______________:______________! ■ 1 I i ' i ! i i i i ; 1 i •; i ; •A ;•■ i i 1 i * ’ * 4 ‘ i i ' I ! ; : ' i i ' ::1 k t ! ’ !V J ! ff ■ i i i : :-4/■ ! ! ! : i ; _i ! 1 i ■ !1 * if \ ^ \ Wl » ! i t i ^ * • 1 i * ' ♦ I ’ * ' I ,' ' ‘ ! 1 ♦ ' ! ! 1 i i I ! •: ' i •1 ? » t ’ ' ! : 1 i 1 ~'f ' • = ' i . I 1 : 1 1 1 i ! " 1 '^! ■ i 1 ‘ I 'i ■ ‘ ' i : ; i i i M 1 M i ! ! ! 1 ; ! j i ;i ! i ; : s ! 1 1 1 i 1 1 : i I t I { i i ! 1 ( 1 • i 1 i 1 : ' ' 1 ! ! i ! : • • I i i i ! i 1 : 1 * ! 1 1 M i : i !; I I t I • i 1 i I ! 1 i ; 1 !♦ * • i It!■ -------♦—4 ------- 1 i i ; -■L-.L- ! I I I fI » , t .*1 ' J4 •j - * t * I ' • • t t I ! * !i. 1. l {I IJ- *; ' ' -fc. --vV *4 < '*• •*.«.*' ^ • •. V -: / •r?' ' :;5.; . %.' . .ii; ;. y* i * 4. ' *i, CT- rA V- ;4 . > ___1r*^ -1 3l 11 i*v ^ A \ /1 ! ! 1 1 11 1 1 1 (1 !1 1 1 !> 1 1 1 • 1 « ! 1 I • 1 !J \A 1 V 1 1 1 1 i i l 1 1 ! 1 Jt:—1 «1 1 1 > '1 I 1 • i 1 \1 4 ti !i i (1 • 1 ' t J 1 * ! 1 i 1 1 y ml 1 1 f i i i i i ! i t )1 !i 1 i 1 1 1f • ' • ‘ 1! 1 • i !11 {-o 4 • L!j - I-1 i 1 i !1t <7 ‘ > 1 ! I 1 1 i 1 t ? t ; ; » i4 1 i 1 * ! ' ! ! ^1 1 ! 1 ' i1 1 f 1 1 ! 1 1 i I ! i 1 ' ‘ ^ ! 1 .i ! 1 ! 1 t !1 _____4_____ 1 i i i ! M M i j\A> r i j j ■1 1 1 : 1 It 1 II i ! M ^ i 1 i i ^zjr ( ___!___.___ i 1 1 1 i i L___L i______1 !i i i i ; * 1•1 1 f t M! ^^ t ^ i i • • i i jj 1 * 1 ^ ! » 1 1 ’ 1 ^ ^ *■ . : i t 1 ‘ • i 1 1 I i I i j J i *i » I I l%! i t I I ( t J 1 1 i U i J i i • i i 1°' 1 • 1 t 1 1 J 1 1 1 i i 1 • ■ 1 !1 i !1 \«f "1 j 1 { 1 ! 11 1 1 1 (1 i ! ! I • I i { I » i i I ; ' I 1 : > 5 1 I I i I ! i ! i' t ! ! t I I !i i I i ! I ! i 1 i ! • Ml! 4 I I ? I I I \ f L L«r> A ! ! 1 1 p-J---------He—1 ! j t________________!___ -----r-ri— 1 i 1 I 1 !i i ' ! i1 ‘ f 1 1 *i i 1 • * 1 ! i j 1 1 : ! !i 1 1J t ♦ i 1 i*■ i L.. i .i ..__i 1 i ' ’ ; i I i i M 1 ! !! i i 0]i ;);) [r'Wrwtvf\jrT^~^ ‘ \i I I !•Tjir I .w i I ' j V I --I i I *' iM ■. ~~ 9 • • • ! 1 1 1 ____?____ \ 1___1___1 !!1 -------!-------i 1 j !! i ! 1 i•! 1 1 i 1 i 1 » 1 1 1 i ! 1 t 1 '1 !i 1 1 11 1 1 1t 1 1 \ \ i i t 1 1 i 1 1 1 f1 ! 1 1 I i i i I t ! ! 1 1 111 1 : • ! ill!1 1 (1 1 1 i 1 ! i !□1 1 » f !i i i 1 1 i ! i i \ 1 1 t !j ■ 1 .‘ ! !! i ' ! ' _____!_________!____1 1 1 i ! i 1 ___1___ I 1 ! 1 1 ♦ j—1 i i !i i M ! i i • 1 1 1 i i ! 1 1 : .t 1 i !i 1 i i i 1 1 ! 1 1 ____1____u 1 s ; * 1 i 1 ! I 1 1 i ! i 1 1 !! i 1 • ! 1 1 ! __1____\______^__\__i__L •1t » 1t 1 1 ! 1 1 i 1 ' 1 1 M ! i i ! ! 1 i * i i '! i i M 1 1 1 1 it ! ’ ‘ > i 'II I 1 1 ; 1 1 ‘ 1 i • 1 !i i !! ! 1 ; i ! 1 I 1 i I ! t :! 1 1 • ■ i : • ! • J * :i ! ! i : i ! i ! i I ! ! i M ! ! 1 : • i : i • > ' ; • 1 1 1 1 i ! ! 1 I ! : i i 1 1 i 1 ! 1 1 1 i 1 1 M ! i : ■ ; 1 I i j i i M M j /# ^“ ■Kh 1 |n! i i i ^ ’ 5 t • 1 1 ; i ; i i ' • i ; 1 I i : .J ] ' 4 • i *<■ . -l' : ':• i ‘ = la 1 ^k-»m mm i-« 7vt** - • i ^ M •; 1'/'?‘ • V # ' "W • ■Uf 1rf1 •tV lii . <«• ■'■ • 1 i (1 1) i1 • i ! 1 1 !i 1 ! , • ! i 1 1 1 • • TMill » i ^ 1 1 1 » ; 1 r 1 1 i 1 I !i 1 •1 11 1 i 1 1) i ft I 1 !1 1 I 1 1 ; ! 1 1 1 _J_i i ;! 1 !1 1 ! i* «11 1 1 !i J. ! I I . 1 . !___ill 1 i 1_________!____:_____! 1 1 1 i )» ( 'i i f ? « ! 1 1 ! i [ f t » • • < 1 • i • 1 » •• t » I • 1 ; ;■ 1 1 1 ; 1 ! 1 » • 1 i 1 1»i i Mil! !M I ! 1 I i ! :1 1 i1 M ill ! ! !1(1\ ! • ^ t i j 'M M ! M i_L_i f ? ! I 1 1 1 1 T«=r A? ! ^ > 'll! I • yr I I • • ! ! ; I I I •7^I ! I i_ ^ » }i ! i I I I ‘‘ I ! i ! 1 » I I I I I I f I ! I • t i( ! . I m I ! I Ti I t : Mi i I i i M 1 1 ! I ^ i H !4 I t I I i i 1 ' vOv ' iy^\1 i i ' i * 1 M M : M \ 4 i 1 ! 1 '■ f : ; i 1 —^UJP M i M 1 4 I i I i ! f * I --S 0 ..«•. i,;^'I i :r.^r;o • *n Complete Date: 60 Day Deadline: 2/5/02 4/6/02 rtb 2 5 2002 ^;iVY OF OROniU REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: February 20.2002 ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator Adminbtrator Reviewed:Agenda Sectioo: Zoning Item Description:#02-2747 Eagle Crest North West TownhomesH onka Ventures 3749 Livingston Avenue Vacation of a portion of a dedicated Drainage and Utility Easement Zoning District:LR-IC - Single Family Lakeshore Residential District List of Esbibits A Resolution B Site Plan C Planning Report (February 11,2002) Review of Request Eagle Crest has requested a vacation of a portion of a dedicated drainage and utility easement. The drainage and utility easement was dedicated on the plat of Lake Minnetonka Woods in 1999. Lake Minnetonka Woods is the 29-unit town house development on Livingston Avenue. The purpose of the vacation request is to construct an end town house unit 1.5' into the easement area. Copies of the plat show ing the easement area and propos"'! vacation are attached. The total request w ould vacate an area of less than 10 s.f. The easement area c itains both a sewer line and watermain. The closest service is the sewer line which would be located 7.8' when the building is constructed. 1, it) has notified utility companies of the request to vacate a portion of the easement. No concerns from those utilities notified have been received as of the date of this memo. Qwest and Reliant Energy/Minnegasco have both responded and stated they have no facilities w ithin the easement area. The City of Orono has determined there are methods available to provide maintenance to the serv ice lines without impacting the building based on 7.8' to the comer of the building. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the request to vacate a portion of drainage and utility easement. The recommendation is based on the fact that the public use of the easement for sewer and water purposes are not negatively impacted by the vacation, and no negative comments have been received from public utilities. J 1^02-2747 Eagle Crest North West Townhomes/Tonka Ventures 3749 Livingston Avenue Pace 2 of 2 ---------------------------------------------------------- Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission voted 6 to 0 to recommend approval of the easement vacation. Planning Commission also heard from several adjacent property owners regarding the condition of the property. The final approved landscape plans included trees to replace some that were cleared to allow installation of sewer and water lines. The neighboring property owners stated there are additional trees that were to have been planted. Additionally, there is some erosion on the site that is depositing material on adjacent lots. The Planning Commission requested Staff forward the comments of the neighboring residents to the Council. The City of Orono holds a Letter of Credit for the improvements. The Letter of Credit is open to September 1,2002. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED 1 : • j Motion to adopt the attached resolution approving the vacation of the drainage and utility easement. t A RESOLUTION VACATING A DEDICATED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT WITHIN THE PLAT OF LAKE MINNETONKA WOODS FILE NO. 02-2747 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota: and WHEREAS, Eagle Crest Construction, on behalf of Tonka Ventures has applied for vacation of a dedicated drainage and utility easement on property located at 3749 Livingston Avenue. WHEREAS, The portion of the easement to be vacated is legally described as follows: Attached hereto as “Exhibit A” (hereinafter “vacated drainage and utility easement ”); and WHEREAS, after due published and posted notice, a public hearing was held by the Orono Planning Commission on February’ 19.2002 regarding said vacation and all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard: and WHEREAS, on February 19,2002 after due standing and consideration, the Plaiming Commission recommended unanimous approval of the proposed vacation; and The vacation as proposed is in keeping with the public interest and in consideration of the following findings: 1.The proposed vacation does not negatively impact the existing use of the easement for sewer and water service. The City of Orono has received no objections to the vacation. 3.Qwest, Xcel Energy, and Reliant Energy/Minnegasco have all responded and have stated they did not have existing facilities within the easement area. Page 1 of 4 ni li^r r NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the vacation of the portion of dedicated drainage and utility easement as described in Exhibit A, as shown on the Certificate of Survey attached as Exhibit B is hereby granted by the Council of the City of Orono on this 25* day of February, 2002. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) )ss. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day of February, 2002 by Barbara A. Peterson and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of 4 • m m m m ^ " m m • * ^m m m m m m m Exhibit A Proposed l^al description to vacate that part of the drainage and utility easement over, under, and acrou Lot 17. Block 2, LAKE MINNETONKA WOODS as dedicated on die recorded plat thereof siniate in Hennepin County. Minnesott described as foUowi; commencing as the most eascrly comer of said Lot 17; thcacc North 63 degrees 22 minutes 08 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the northeasterly line of said Lot 17 a distance of 12.80 feet; thence South 12 depees 07 minutes 44 seconds West 5.68 feet to the poim of bearing of the tract of land to be herein described; thence South 63 degrees 22 minutes 08 seconds East 1.88 feet; thence South 26 degrees 37 minutes 52 seconds West 7.26 feet; thence North 12 degrees 07 minutes 44 seconds East 7.50 feet to the poim of be^nning and there terminating. Page 3 of 4 t,.. Exhibit B l9UbU«ll«4 iB IMa LOT SURVEYS COMPANY. INC. LAND SURVEYORS RKClSrniBO UNDCH THE LAVS Of STATE Of lllNlfl90TA ____ 7001 73rd A v «bu « Vorih 7W -M0-30V3 Pbi No. 060-3688 HUuiMpollB. HlDDMaia 66428 &ururi}ors (0rrtiftratr MKS9MVOtCE NO.. F.B.N0___ SCALE: 1 JO* o OcnolM bon ygnumoni U OmlM Wood K* Sol for oocowotion only Oonotoo CaloUng Elovollon C^M<’,)Oonol#o Propoood Dovotton ----- Oonotoo Sirfoco Oroinogo EACLE CREST lEMES NOTE:Propoood grodoo oro oubjoct to rooiilo of ool loolo. Property locAled in Section 17, Township 117, R««*e 23, * Hmepin County, Ninnesota Propoood buldbg Informotlon must bo cbodiod oUb opprovod buldbtg plon ond dovolopmonl or qrocHng plon boloro oacovoUon ond conotruciiort. Propoood Top of fSocIi Propoood Corogo Floor Propoood Loooot Floor Typo of BuMng CoRWca To VacatcO mwut. Lota 14, 15, 16 oiiJ 17, Block 2, LAKE HUtlEIlJNKA UDODS Propoood kgal dtacnpooo 10 vacuo tlM port oCibt droioogo lod lOfiiy ow.oadv.MdoaQoiLail7,8lock2,LAKE MINNETOMLA WOODS ao 100 d« focordod plai WnooF oBiM io Nonb AJ ZpiM 22 oiioiioo^Oi owi wi^^ ^ fai oTiMd Lot ITadbttoeo of mown; taco SoMdllld^rw^ AdHoaoiiWonia talodopodooTboHniiVWooanoftalobo 141 dwoM S otan 01 loeo^ Eon I.M ta; taco SoMdl 2d divon 17 *o ro^nfi*! ur 1*). il 7>v. • j k! .. Ko only oa prowklod by cSont. Wo horoby corUfy ihol Udo io o Uyo ond corrocl roprooontoUon of o nrvoy of tho boundorloo of Iho above dooerWod lend and tho lecollon of ol buMngo and viota oncreuchwontOi If any. from or on ooW land 20 01Survovod by iio Udo___IZi^doy of-------^!SSSl oooomonio ohoom oro from ploU of rocord or kUormoUon 4AMH4iM r -r* 00 VOBAroe dLvoon. lArn. Rog. NoJ173J or M No.Qrofory It ProocN Mkoi Rog 24092 Complete Date: 60 Day Deadliae: 2/5/02 4/6/02 TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator DATE:February 11,2002 SUBJECT: #02-2747 Eagle Crest North West Townhomes/Tonka Ventures 3749 Livingston Avenue Vacation of a portion of a dedicated Drainage and Utility Easement Zoning District:LR-IC • Single Family Lakeshore Residential District List of Exhibits: A B C D E F G H 1 Application Plat Map Survey/Site Plan Preconstruction Utility Plans Plat of Lake Minnetonka Woods City Engineer Comments (February 6,2002) Reliant Energy/Minnegasco Comments (February 5,2002) Qwest Comments (February 5,2002) Property Owners Notification List Application: Eagle Crest has requested a vacation of a portion of a dedicated drainage and utility easement. The drainage and utility easement was dedicated on the plat of Lake Minnetonka Woods in 1999. Lake Minnetonka Woods is the 29-unit town house development on Livingston Avenue. The purpose of the vacation request is to construct an end town house unit I .S' into the easement area. Copies of the plat showing the easement area and proposed vacation are attached. The total request would vacate an area of less than 10 s.f. The easement area contains both a sewer line and watermain. The closest service is the sewer line which would be located 7.8' when the building is constructed. The City has notified utility companies of the request to vacate a portion of the easement. No concerns from those utilities notified have been received as of the date of this memo. Qwest and Reliant Energy/Minnegasco have both responded and stated they have no facilities within the easement area. The City of Orono has determined there are methods available to provide maintenance to the service lines without impacting the building based on 7.8' to the comer of the building. 102-2747 Eagk Crest North West To%vnhomcs/TQfika Ventures 3749 Livingstoa Avenue February 19.2002 Pafelof2 1 Inr ■ i-ii fTr Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the vacation request to vacate a portion of the drainage and utility easement as shown on the plat of Lake Minnetonka Woods ba^ on the fact that the public use of the easement for sewer and water purposes are not negatively impacted by the vacation and no negative comments have been received by public utilities, subject to the following condition: 1. The applicant shall provide final “as-built ” plans for the entire development of Lake Minnetonka Woods prior to review of the vacation request by the City Council. PLANNING COMMISSION OPTIONS FOR ACTION 1. Approve 2.Table 3. Deny, stating reasons 4. Other Action H02-2747 Crest North West Townhoma/Tofilsi Vctmoes 3749 Livingston Avenue February 19,2002 Page2of2 i L,-. AppidHonO CQ-37»-t7 Drte Rttdved I -33 -Joo 9- AmouotPaid 3oo.co CITY OF )RONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERT f LOCATION kdcrcssSit* A( Type cf Application to be Filed . Propery Identification Number (P.I.D.) 37^ City Zip ayc/yyAddress^lETErP jdi TDate Pry fty Acquired ______ I ido>^2t n5) *lso own the adjacent parcels of land. Ph<>oe (home )9^3 --■3. ----- Phone (work )*?6a */<mH Z«Liiy -/yi^i s Zip (month year) FEES - CO MDITIONAL USE PERMITS - — ’' 75*00 For each variance request with CU? application ______ I 175.00 Residential Accessory Use _____: 250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) ______ ; 225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _____; 200.00 Duplex Credit'Bldg _____' 225.00 Contmeicial/Industrial Use : 250.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland cr floodplain Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore I 'RD/PID • see Fee Schedule 3150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original ipplication) Aiter'the«Fact Fee - Double Current .Application Fee OTHER AIVLICATIONS _____$21275.00 Cofluneicial Site Plan Review (■♦■ consu'tant fees) 300.00 Vacation 200.00 Easement Vacation 100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision 350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) 375.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 100.00 Appeals (hthcr - see Fee Schedule r j 1 a;!s^'9'iiV cr’ S’j’Qi r.3*tt'<« cs.vt‘1 rxciii sn".s c'ivH-):«£ 5 n rrya 50.20 to t 0 s - (28)f27j so 50*5 aof.jg 534.47 S89'4^ / <0 ^46)/ C<.>l 7 4/ 7 ^47; 04.09 140 JR------(HeSAH-Ne-t5rPtAf^--------------------------------------- ll-tl7-:2.3-(3^ f.f >f 1 y. :• •»> >w/. • .•« • .• fc*.« •<« )‘f^arcel Information 1^101711723340081 \ HeiiM NuiiilMr 3749 . '’'4-' •tra«t Nam* UVINOSTON CT : *’ 7N$ is not a l0gaPy ncotdtd mtp. itfSptssantsa comiastiQnoflnl^ijsM^^ and data Aom CNy. County, andStalamadaulhodliasandodtar aouitaa^4v' . * r r—l-U \ i * , • Houa* Numlmr 3749 ' 'I lots 14, 16 and 17, Block 2, LAKE ME (o . • 4" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY SERVICE (TYP.) - ^ »• 4 I • M t \ *% ------T-- 1 COPPER SERVICE w/CURB STOP (TYP.) RETAWI BY OiTH WALL M (TYP.) COMMON LOT 18 IJVINGSTON AVET ” REMOVE PLUG AND CONNECT TO EX. 6" DIP WM WITH 6** GV ^ % / 4 • LIVINGSTON AVENUE / ** j ^ % I# % • • 1 ¥ ON AVET MD CONNECT IM WITH f • r' A !! ■* A lA ,3-W / 161.40 ^Va-p \4^> 0.0 w>9 o O V® •w^ NB9^43’J4"W 2i "fi30.00 \ 30.00 N^V/ '// •^■*i / 30.00 30.00 P 30.00 % r- —\x 203.00 V oQi—^ V ^ / ^,1 63 SB9*>43 ’34'‘E '^31® ^B1.53->^ ^ ^o.QO^j’J4T N gOJ.flg_ • # I A • ✓ % 1/ I Ml I -t r f I « % ✓ %J I / r - A I • 1/ f-- Mil f 4- - I • .. . £05em».. 0 % C#/1 h- #' ■ “rI'k'^ ?° ^/i / ^ V** '^ V>. V m u' V .. ^ ’•>.?’/'l^i ^ ^ ^W« '^oU s<*& 5? :^i- 30.00 g W <o \ '^- 79.67 \ S 89**43 ’34’ E m t >8 fit L^^' ouif*'-■A' <0.s S \' «oXc> Drainage and Utility Casement over all of Outlot B m^. o* ^ to V > <5 rv .i ■*& o aJSI Or. t— / A.’'> ^ \ I < ' - ^4> 057^ / II i->j ''4i? -t*-s: 37'52'«» i4.00 _ 037*31 W' ll9.63 »22'0«’£ tS5< \ \ \ > -^W ■'"-- / . / “--^1 U /-f I ^ .■j-f N2«‘ ;='30. S SQ 17'52*£ // OroinoQe Easement / • 4 Ase mr LAND An..« .Air-0*■ I ____ *------------Drainage Easement WET LAND SHOREUME DRIVE south line of Block 9 ^7.00 S89^49 ‘14T 534.47 /»•# »i#r- * ^ h H t t § \t ^ • K ^ 9 |\X| V4.. r \ r \ 9 9 t /“ ' # I ^ # I / L > « I I V t. . II II # % r % 1*^ I I ft I \ Mil I ^ I • * I - \ I 0 Bonestroo Rosene Ancferlik & |\j| Associates Engineers & Architects Febniaiy 6,2002 Paul Weinberger Zoning Administrator/PIanner City of Qrono Post Office Box 66 ' Crystal Bay. MN SS323 SofittlTM. e»t€«w. AfiecrWl Mtf AiM<ial*f« Inc. ft an Arflniiailva ActlOff^Eaual Opaortynfty fif^oyar and layipytt Owna< # Prlnclpalt: Octo a Bonestroo. PE. • Marvin L Sorvjit. PC • Glenn ff. Coofc. PE. • toBea G Schunichc PE. • Jerry A. Bourdon. P£. Senior ContuKantt: Bobert W. Boterse. P^ • Josepn C Anderffk. PJ. • Btchard t Ibrner. PX • Sus«i M Cbertm. C.PA. Attoclaie PrInciMit-* A. Cordon. PE- • Bobert B. Preffene. PX • Bicnard W. Potter. PI. • Oavid O. lotboca. P.E • Mark A Hanson. PE. • MUebaef T. Bauimann. PE. • IM K. Field. PE. • Kenneth P Andersori PE. • biani B. Boifi. PC. • David K Bonestroo. MBA • Sidney P WMiamton. PI. LS • Agnes M. Bing. MBA. • AM«iBicli SchnOdt PC. • Thomas W. Petertoa PE. • James B. Malandl PE • Miles B Jensea PC. • L PhiMp Gravel «. PE. • OMdel J. Cdgerton. PE. • ftmaef Martinet. PC. • Thomas A lyfko. PE. • Sheldon J. Johnson • Dale A Grove. PC. • Thomas A Bouthar. PB. • Bobert J. Oevery. PB. Ofricet: St. Paul. St Cloud. Bochettcr ar^d Willmar. MN • Mdwauiwe. Wi • Chicago. B. Wbbsite: wwwBonesiroo.com P* r • • - . ., V . • . '*3•• • Fzd 0 7 r;r; Cl I y \jr (JnOt\iQ Re: Tonka Venbires Easement Vac.Uion File No. 139-02-000 Plat No. 02-2747 Dear Paul: We have reviewed the request from Tonka Ventures for the easement vacation on Lot 17, Block 2, Lake Minnetonka Woods. We have the following comments with regards to engineering matters: • The construction plans submitted are not adequate to review the proposed easement vacation. The applicant must provide “as-built" plans of the sewer and water in this area. • Once the “as-built" plans are submitted we will provide comments. If you have any questions please call me at (651) 604-4863. Yours very truly, BONESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERLQC & ASSOCIATES, INC. Cc: Greg Gappa, City of Orono 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55ft3 • 651-636-4600 • Fax: 65I-636-I3II Located at 3749 Lmogston Avenue City FUe M2-2747 Reliaat Energy Attn: Steve Von Bergen Reel Estete Specielist 700 West Linden Avenue Minneepolis, MN 55440-1165 Mediacon I5042''StieetS.E. Wesece, MN 56093 Xcel Energy Attn: Sheron M. Price Siting and Lend Rights 414 Nicollet Mali Minneapolis, MN 55401-1993 Qwest • 9700 Schmidt Lake Road Plymouth, MN 55442 Hid 1) 7 Per'’ LI 11 v/rwoOjVO Veriion/GTE Telephone Operations 2378 Wilshire Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 Wright Hennepin Electric Company P.O. Box 330 Rockford. MN 55373 City of Orono Attn: Greg Gappa, Public Services Director P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 Date:January 3 1,2002 Applicant:Tonka Ventures, L.L.C. 7760 France Avenue South #770 Minneapolis, MN 5S435 (952)924-4614 Request:The City of Orono has received a request by the property owner of 3749 Livingston Avenue to vacate a small portion of a public drainage and utility easement. The drainage and utility easement was dedicated on the plat of Lake Minnetonka Woods in 1999. Purpose:Property owner has requested to vacate 1.5* of the easement to permit construction of an end townhouse unit encroaching into the easement area. A copy of a survey indicating the portion of the easement to be vacated is attached. Comments: Any comments should be received by the City of Orono by February 18, 2002. A public h' ’ring to consider the vacation request is scheduled for Tuesday, February 19,2002. Comments should be mailed or faxed to: Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066 phone: 952-249-4600 fax: 952-249-4616 Reliant Energy Minnegasco has no facilities within the above-described area and has no objection to its vacation. Thank you for the advance notice Steven Von Right-Of-Way Administrator Reliant Bier^ Minnegasco 9700 Schmidt Loke Rood Room 344 Plymouth. Minnesoto 55442 Februory 5.2002 City of Orono Poul Weinberger. Zoning Administrotor P.O. Box 66 Crystol Boy. MN 55323-0066 FEB 0 7 ?rn Uii I ur Wh ride thehe Qwest RE: Vocotion Notice 3749 Livingston Avenue Deor Mr Weinberger Qwest Communications has no facilities in oreo in question for the vocation notice ot 3749 Livingston Avenue City File Number 02-2747. Sincerely. Rick Jorgensen Senior Design Engineer (612) 531-6385 i mm DAU ti/ii/ia iATCH Sfl HENNEPIN COUNTY PHOPENTY IMFOPNATZON SYSTEH PAOPEOTY ONNEAS LIST REPOtT NO. PZASSAtl PACE S PROP AOOt ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/AODR PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/AODR PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/AODR PROP ADDR ONNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR PROI ADDR ONNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR SO 17-117-2S 34 §§74 •3793 LXVINCSTON CT EAOLE CREST NORTNNEST INC EAGLE CREST NORTNNEST INC P 0 DOX 47393 NPLS NN 55447 30 17-117-23 34 ••75 •3735 LIVINGSTON CT EAOLE CREST NORTMNEST INC EAGLE CREST NORNINEST INC P 0 DOX 47333 NPLS HN 55447 3D 17-117-23 34 0074 •3739 LIVINGSTON CT NITCNELL N LUTZ NITCNELL N LUTZ 3739 LIVINGSTON CT NAVZATA m 55991 3S 17-117-23 34 ••77 •3741 LIVINGSTON CT H AKHTAR t A JONRl HASAN AKHTAR/ANVITA JOHRl 3741 LIVINGSTON CT NAYZATA NN 55391 3D 17-117-23 34 0D7D •3743 LIVINGSTON CT KATHLEEN HANSDERCER KATHLEEN NANSBERGER 3743 LIVINGSTON CT NAYZATA HN 55391 3D 17-117-23 34 ••79 •3745 LIVINGSTON CT TONKA VENTURES LLC TONKA VENTURES LLC 7743 FRANCE AVE S R77R EDINA HN 55435 3D 17-117-23 34 •••• 03747 LIVINGSTON CT TONKA VENTURES LLC TONKA VENTURES LLC 7740 FRANCE AVE S R770 EDINA NN 55435 3D 17-117-23 34 OODl •3749 LIVINGSTON CT TONKA VENTURES LLC TONKA VENTURES LLC 7740 FRANCE AVE S B770 EDINA HN 55435 3D 17-117-23 34 00D2 03751 LIVINGSTON CT TONKA VENTURES LLC TONKA VENTURES LLC 7740 FRANCE AVE S R770 EDINA HN 55435 3D 17-117-23 34 00D3 •••3D ADDRESS PENDING LAKE NTKA WOODS ASSOC LAKE NTKA WOODS ASSOC C/0 EAGLE CREST NORTHWST INC P 0 DOX 47333 PLYHOUTH HN 55447 3D 17-117-23 34 00D4 •••35 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED LAKE NTKA WOODS ASSOC LAKE NTKA WOODS ASSOC C/0 EAGLE CREST NORTHWST INC P 0 DOX 47333 PLYHOUTH HN 55447 3D 17-117-23 34 DODD •••3D ADDRESS UNASSIGNED TONKA VENTURES LLC TONKA VENTURES LLC 7740 FRANCE AVE S 5770 EDINA NN 55435 TOTAL BATCH 501 ••04D I r I # ' 1 •’ •% / I W ► j i....» i 1.m, / mm DATE ti/ii/tz iATCH 5tl PROP ADDR OliNER NAHC TAMPAVER NAHE/AODR 9D 17-U7-2S 3A ttSA fS72f LXVXR6ST0N AVE EAGLE CREST NORTNUEST XNC EAGLE CREST NORTHWEST XNC P 0 DON A7S33 PLVtfOinN NN 55AA7 NENNEPXN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORNATXON SYSTEN PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 3G 17-117-23 3A ft57 •371A LIVINGSTON AVE EAGLE CREST NORTHWEST INC EAGLE CREST NORTHWEST XNC P 0 BON A7S33 PLYHOUTH m 55AA7 REPORT NO. PIASSAiX PAGE 2 36 17-117-23 36 M56 03716 LIVINGSTON AVE SONJA HENGESTEO SONJA HENGESTEG 3716 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA HN 55361 PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAKPAYER NAHE/AODR 36 17-117-23 36 0056 03712 LIVINGSTON AVE EAGLE CREST NORTHWEST XNC EAGLE CREST NORTHWEST INC P 0 BON 67333 PLYHOUTH HN 55667 3B 17-117-23 36 0060 03710 LIVINGSTON AVE H S HUPPERT OHS HUPPERT HATTHEW/HELISSA HUPPERT 3710 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 36 17-117-23 36 0061 03706 LIVINGSTON AVE CALE E RAHAXER CALE E RAHAKER 3706 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 7 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAIS/ADDR 36 17-117-23 36 0062 03706 LIVINGSTON AVE JULIE N WILSON JULIE N WILSON 3706 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA NN 55391 36 17-117-23 36 0063 03702 LIVINGSTON AVE KRISTIN ONE KRISTIN ONE 3702 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA NN 55391 36 17-117-23 36 0066 03700 LIVINGSTON AVE DANA E NYBO I SARAH K SPXVAK DANA E NYBO A SARAH K SPIVAK 3700 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA NN 55391 c L PROP ADDR OWNER NAHC TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 36 17-117-23 36 0065 00036 ADDRESS PENDING LAKE NTKA WOODS ASSOC LAKE NTKA WOODS ASSOC C/0 EAGLE CREST NORTHWST INC P 0 BOX 67333 PLYHOUTH NN 55667 36 17-117-23 36 0066 03715 LIVINGSTON AVE TRACI N SXNGHER TRACI N SXNGHER 3715 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 30 17-117-23 36 0067 03713 LIVINGSTON AVE C S HUNTXNGTON/J WRIGGXNS CRAIG S HUNTINGTON JANIE WRIGGINS 3713 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA NN 55391 L PROP ADDR OWNER NAHC TAXPAYER NANC/ADOR 30 17-117-23 36 0066 03711 LIVINGSTON AVE B V BESSXNGPAS 6 B J STANTON BRIAN V BESSXNGPAS BRIAN J STANTON 3711 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA NN 55391 36 17-117-23 36 0069 03707 LIVINGSTON AVE DAWN N TANABE DAWN N TANABE 3707 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA NN 55391 36 17-117-23 36 0070 03705 LIVINGSTON AVE LORI SCHAEFER LORI SCHAEFER 3705 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA NN 55391 L L PROP ADOR OWNER NAHC TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 36 17-117-23 36 0071 03703 LIVINGSTON AVE VANESSA K ARNOLD VANESSA R ARNOLD 370S LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA NN 55391 36 17-117-23 36 0072 03701 LIVINGSTON AVE LISA N GUSTAFSON LISA N GUSTAFSON 3701 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA NN 55391 36 17-117-23 36 0073 03731 LIVINGSTON CT EAGLE CREST NORTHWEST INC EAGLE CREST NORTHWEST XNC P 0 BOX 67333 NPLS HN 55667 V.? •V "r RUN DATE tl/ll/fZ BATCH 5il NENNEPXN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORNATION SYSTEN PROPERTY ONNERS LIST PROP AOOR ONNCR NAHC TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR SB 17-1I7-2S 54 BBSB •SAAB LXVXMSTON AVE T 0 THOMA B J A K08ERNUS T THONA B J TNOHA SAAB LIVINGSTON AVE VAY2ATA m 55SBI PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAItE/ADDR SB 17-U7-2S S4 BBSS B5AB2 LYRIC AVE JANE P GROSS JANE P CROSS SAB2 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA HN 55S91 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAffE/AOOR SB 17-117-23 S4 BBSA BSA4B LYRIC AVE GERALD LEE SINONSON GERALD LEE SINONSON SAAB LYRIC AVE WAYZATA NN 55591 PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR SB 17-117-25 54 BBS9 BSAB5 LYRIC AVE C H ROBBINS B K ANRENS KATHERINE AHRENS SABS LYRIC AVE WAYZATA NN 55S9I PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SB 17-117-2S S4 0142 BSA5S LYRIC AVE H B L FELKER HARLAN 8 LOLA FELKER SA55 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA NN 55S91 PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR SB 17-117-2S S4 0045 0SA25 LYRIC AVE KATHLEEN L FINE KATHLEEN L FINE SA25 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA NN 55S91 ■ -n o 7 REPORT NO. PI4S54BI PAGE 1 SB 17-117-2S 34 OBSl 0S47B LIVINGSTIXi AVE RICHARD W EPLAND RICHARD W EPLAND 3470 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 SB 17-117-23 34 BB32 BS4BB LIVINGSTON AVE CHERYL K NOUN CHERYL K NOUN lOBBl WAYZATA BLVO B12B NINNETONKA NN 55SB5 SB 17-117-23 34 0B34 03490 LYRIC AVE JOIM J LAGIESKl JOHN J LAGIESKl 3490 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA NN 55S91 SB 17-117-23 34 BOSS 03450 LYRIC AVE C D LENNON 8 T J NICOL CHAD D LENNON B TARA J NICOL 3450 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 SB 17-117-23 S4 0037 0S497 LYRIC AVE JOSEPH J ARONE JOSEPH J ARONE 3497 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA NN 55391 SB 17-117-23 34 003B 03495 LYRIC AVE CONSTANCE C LEAF CONSTANCE C LEAF 3495 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 SB 17-117-23 34 0040 03475 LYRIC AVE DOUGUS J NIELAND DOUGLAS J NIELAND 3675 LYRIC AVE ORONO HN 55391 SB 17-117-23 34 0041 03445 LYRIC AVE JEFFREY 0 KOCH JEFFREY G KOCH 3645 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 SB 17-117-23 34 0043 03445 LYRIC AVE THONAS H PENN THONAS H PENN 4270 CIR RD TONKA DAY HN 55331 30 17-117-23 34 0044 03635 LYRIC AVE DEAN W B NURIEL LATTIN DEAN W B NURIEL LATTIN 3635 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 • 0 3B 17-117-23 34 0054 03724 LIVINGSTON AVE EAGLE CREST NORTHWEST INC EAGLE CREST NORTHWEST INC P 0 BOX 47333 PLYNOUTH NN 55447 3B 17-117-23 34 0055 03722 LIVINGSTON AVE EAGLE CREST NORTHWEST INC EAGLE CREST NORTHWEST INC P 0 BOX 47333 PLYNOUTH NN 55447 - Xtii ■VI kj \ 'T i ....meetjn® FEB 2 5 2002 Application Date: 60 Day Deadline: 2/5/02 4/6/02 ClV T wr ^nsJlvO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: February 22,2002 ITEM NO.: 9 Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#02*2749 Thomas Egan 350, 360 and 370 Big Island Right-of-Way Vacation Zoning District:Big Island - Recreational Seasonal District List of Exhibits A B C D Plat Map Site Sur\ey Comprehensive Plan Pgs. 3B-49 - 3B-53 (Big Island) Planning Report (February 12, 2002) Application: Property owners have requested to \acate of a portion of platted “Massasoit Avenue". Massasoit Avenue is undeveloped right of way on Big Island originally dedicated on the plat of Morse Island Park. Right of wa\ has been used by the public for interior pedestrian access to parts of the lakeshore and. periodically, for vehicular traffic for transporting materials for home construction and septic installation. The right of way is also used by utility companies to provide electric and phone service to the Island properties. There are two houses either fully inside or partially inside the Massasoit Avenue right of way that is proposed for vacation. Attached Exhibit A is a sun ey document the indicates the location of the right of way and structures. The City notifies all public utilities of the vacation request since they resene the right to use public right of way for their facilities. Reliant Energy/Minnegasco and .\cel Energy have provided documentation to the City of Orono stating that they have no facilities in the right-of-way. Qwest, however, did notify the City that they do have existing facilities w ithin the right of way and stated they respectfully decline the right of way vacation request. Please review the attached letter, dated February 6, 2002, and maps provided by Qwest. Qwest has since backed off their original request to not vacate and are working to locate lines and determine it lines are actually located w ithin the right of way. If there are service lines within the right of w ay they are open to discussion w ith the property owners to relocate serv ices or enter into private easement agreements, if possible. #02-2749 Thomas Egan 350,360 and 370 Big Island Page 2 of 2 _____________ Vacation of any public right of way shall not cause any lot to lose interior road access. Although most lots do abut the shoreline, use of the interior roadway system is primarily by owners of interior lots and by owners of lakeshore lots with shoreline slopes that prohibit lakcshore access. The proposed v acation would not cause any lot to lose access to a public right of way. There are no public docks on the Island. Not having a public docking area restricts use of the island to property owners and guests during the boating season. The Veteran’s Park and the boat club do attract non homeowners to the island, however they are privately owned properties and are not generally open to the public. Vehicular access does occur during the w inter months and is necessary for properties on occasion. The City has observed that overuse of the undeveloped roadw ays has created some erosion problems. The Citv does not want to encourage overuse of the island areas because of the maintenance issues and concern over trespass on private property. Trespassing does occur as the roadways are not marked. According to information available to the City, property surveys and City topo maps, it does not appear any part of Massasoit Avenue or Metacomet Avenue have direct public access to the lakeshore. Pianniny Commission Rccommcndation/Pisciission The Planning Commission review ed the proposal and noted there may be a public value to Massasoit Avenue as a potential trail. The cabins located w ithin the right of way restricts public pedestrian use of the corridor. The entire corridor is almost entirely w ithin 75' of the lakeshore. No buildings could replace the cabins when the time comes for the lots to redevelop. The cabins would ha\e to be mo\ ed back on the propertj' to meet all current setback requirements. To keep the interests of the public in mind, the Planning Commission noted the right of way may serve a future public use as island as a future trail corridor. Also noted was the potential for one or two public access points to the lakeshore. The survey indicates the existing right of way does not reach the Ordinary High Water Level (929.4') of Lake Minnetonka. Therefore there is no public lake access at the south end of the peninsula. The Planning Commission discussed the option of an exchange of land for the vacation to acquire enough property to provide public access to the lakeshore. Based on the potential use of the corridor as a public recreational trail, the Planning Commission felt they would like the Park Commission to review the proposal. The applicant stated he did not wish to have the Park Commission review and would prefer to discuss the propo.sal with the City Council. The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend denial of the application. Planning Commission felt the public future use of the right of way as a trail should be reviewed by the Park Commission before they make a recommendation. The Planning Commission did request the City Council consider forwarding this application, and all future applications for vacating public property, to the Park Commission for their review and recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED To discuss the application for vacation and to consider the Planning Commission recommendation regarding the Park Commission’s role relating to public land vacation requests. i «/•Uf CITY OF ORONO 8 O 8 O Ili iF/€v«w4*ovi CMPPartSB. L—dUxPlM LAKE MINNETONKA ISLANDS Land on Big Island (including the east and west islands plus Mahpiyafa Island) and Deering Island has been privately owned for nuuiy decades and has been used for a significant number of seasonal cottages plus a few year- round homes. The islands also omtain a substantial amount of public and private park land and recreation areas. Blfi ISLAND History Big Island was first called Meeker’s Island for Judge Bradley B. Meeker who settled there in 1852. W.B. Morse purchased it in 1854 and for many years thereaft er it was known as Morse Island. In 1887 and 1 88^, two subdivisions to create small parcels were platted, Morse Island Park on the most southerly point, and Pleasant View on the west end. This resulted in the construction of a number of individual summer homes. During the early 1900's, the Twin City streetcar lines operated Big Island Amusement Park on the east end of the island. The onset of World War I resulted in its dismantling. This 60-acre property eventually became the Big Island Veterans Camp, which is still in operation. Hennepin Parks acquired a 60-acre parcel near the center of the island about 30 years ago, and since then acquiretl a few small adjacent parcels totaling an additional 10 acres as they became available and as fimds permitted. This area has been designated by Hennepin Parks as the Dr. Arthur Allen Wildlife Refuge. By the early 1970's, approximately 50 mostly seasonal cabins existed on private parcels on Big Island. In May 1972 the Orono Village Council declared via Resolution No. 446 that "the long range highest and best use of Big Island is for park purposes", acknowledging that the provision of public services to the island is uneconomical and and unlikely to occur in the future. It was suggested that the Hermepin County Paric Reserve District should admimster such a park. The 1980 Orono Comprehensive Plan noted the same concerns, and again encouraged eventual ownership by Hermepin Paries. However, the City declared it would not condemn private property for park purposes, and therefore in 1983 created the "RS" Recreational Seasonal Zoning District, providing development standards for continued private recreation^ residential use of the island until such time that the slow transition to a public park is complete. The RS Zoning District provides specific standards and limitations for permitted, conditional and acessory uses on the island, with a CHy of Oroao Coamimity MaMgeacal Plan Page 3B-49 catfPPart3B. LMdUiePi— strong encouragement toward recreational uses as opposed to full time residential uses u^ch would require a greater level of services than the City can reasonably provide. As a result of more recent discussions with Hennepin Parks officials, the City Council has concluded that ultimate complete acquisition and ownership of Big Island by Hennepin Parks is unlikely to occur in the foreseeable future. Hennepin Parks ’ current goals and policies do not include expansion of their existing Big Island holdings. Further, the expansion of Hennepin Parks holdings to incorporate adjacent lands that are developed with seasonal cabins may lead to more active park uses. While the current passive park use as a wildlife preserve requires virtually no City services, expansion of the Park area to include lands which could be used for active public recreation would result in the need for a more active management of the Park, and the need for more public services which the City cannot provide. For that reason, Orono’s 2000*2020CMP goals and policies for Big Island reflect support for continuation of Hennepin Parks ’ current level of ownership and control of property on Big Island. Physical Features Big Island encompasses approximately 2S0 acres in area, of which approximately SO acres is wetland. A navigable chaimel acturdly separates Big Island into two distinct islands. The shoreland ranges from flat, low wetland areas near the lake level to steep and often eroded bluffs extending as much as 30-40* above lake level. The topography is hilly. The highest point on the island is 988', nearly 60* above lake level, located near the south end of Morse Island Park. Soils on Big Island are mapped as Hayden loam and clay loam, typical of soils located in central and northern Orono, Beach sand soils occur in a number of flat, low areas near the shoreline. Except for scattered clearings to accommodate individual cabins or recreation areas, the island remains heavily vegetated with hardwood species typical of the "Big Woods". Services Big Island is provided with only a minimal degree of municipal services. There is no municipal sewer or water on the island, hence the use of individual septic systems and wells is common. The island is provided with telephone service and electric power via lines from the mainland. Police protection is minimall y provided by the City of Orono and the Hermepin County Sheriff. Fire protection is provided by the Long Lake Fire Department although response time is u^crstandably poor due to the lack of roads or bridges connecting the island to the mainland, and access to the City of Oroao CoianivaiCy Maaagcacat Plan Septmber MM Pacc3E*50 o u ( > I •Ai-; vd„-’. !?3aE •**' i • • v-», lElii^>?iibiii3©i);<-:» ft.-iliK X lll^ : -V ’•X.'. A> :v • •. . :' ■;■ •■ Ifm LiTfKV,. ✓ I' %1-t^ 'SM.i^^{ •:(;.; Vy ;A.<iV : ^ /*y*'City Boundaiy I > Private Individual or Organization Ownership fS<?i Big Island Veterans Camp ■I Hennepin Partes - Dr. Arthur Allen Wildlife Refuge □ Wetland ] Open Water CZ] Right-Of-Way Big island City of Orono Minnesota UfieUM |1 ■■■^ W‘^ r-0 r 4* 1000 FmI MAP3B-9 CMPPartSB. LaidUfcPiM fglaiwl makes firefighting extremely difficult Other services such as street repair, snow removal, inspections, and regular garbage removal are difficult unecnnomic«t and in some instances virtually impossible to provide to residential property located on the island. Access There are no improved roads on Big Island. A limited system of roadways and alleys was platted more than a century ago inthe ^5orse Island Park and Pleasantview subdivisions, wdiich primarily created narrow lakeshore lots but also resulted in a small number of inland lots not abutting the lakeshore and needing access to the lake. These platted corridors exist today as walking trails v^ch on occasion are used for vehicular access. Since most lots do abut the shoreline, use of the interior roadway system has been primarily by the owners of interior lots, and by owners of lakeshore lots with shoreline slopes that prohibit direct lake access. Vehicular access is necessary for nearly a”, island properties on occasion, hence the interior roadway? are an important transportation element for Big Island. Overuse of the road system by residents or the general public is of concern, since the roads are not improved. Erosion and trespass are two main issues, because the roadways are not marked and they often traverse steep slopes, especially where lanes extend to the lakeshore. Biy Island Issues By virtue of its unique geographic aspects, Big Island presents a number of issues that the City must address on an ongoing basis: 1. Use and maintenance of interior road system; access to inland properties; overuse by vehicles 2. Public use of interior road system, trespass on private property 3. Pressure to accommodate more year-round residential uses, with concurrent expectation of greater services 4. Uncontrolled recreational use of adjacent bays for partying 5. Provisions for safety and emergency services 6.Biuff and shoreline erosion City of OroBO COnmuaity MsBagcaicDt Plaa Pate3B-Sl CMPPtetSB. LaMlUsePUa Big Island Goab and Policies Goab: 1.The City will encourage Hennepin Parks to continue its eiisting level of control and ownership of its land on Big Island. Orono does not have the capability of providing public services and facilities to residents on the islands. The existing balance between private and public ownership of properties on Big Island is reasonable. The City encourages continued use of the Heimepin Parks properties on Big Island as a passive recreational resource for general lake users. Orono will not encourage condemnation or forced conversion of private residential properties on Big Island to public land. The City has adopted ordinances which allow continued individual private seasonal recreatioiuil use of the Island while prohibiting excessive development. Orono will assist Hennepin Parks in continuing its current level of management of its property on Big Island. 2.Continue to allow seasonal recreational land mscs and limited residential uses on Big Island. Such use must be subject to strict enforcement of all peifotmance standards and the explicit understanding that the City will never be able to provide even basic public services. 3.Maintain the natural, seasonal recreational character of the bland. 4.Provide at least a rahthnum level of emergency access to the island. 5.Avoid or minimize future problems on the bbnd in rebtion to sanitation, safety, fire protection, erosion, etc. Policies: 1.Ezbting RS Dbtrict controb on devebpment and bnd use will be strictly enforced, and rebforced where necessary, to avoid potential problems related to sanitation, public safety and security, fire protection, etc. 2.The City will encourage private landowners of bbnd properties to protect their shorelines from erosion. Natural rock rip-rap and other natural methods will be encouraged. Development of retaining wall systems in the lakeshore area will be discouraged. CMy of OiOBO CoBwaalty MaasgcaieBt Piaa Pato3B-S2 JL o u I ) n Wwi;PartSB. LandUwPba 3. • • J The CUy win dcfiae specific apprared access localioBs for hidhridoal inland Record Lots,.and wiO establish policies and ordinances regnlating vdiknlar nse of the nndoveloped roadways. Use of the undeveloped platted roadwi^ for vehicular travel win be limited to the esctent neoessaiy to protect private tree damage, etc. Tree removal within platted ii^its-of>wiy diall be by pennit only. No platted right-of-way riudl be paved except that the City may in^ve or qiecifically peimit improvement of designated access locatioos in order to maintain suitable access and limit envifonmental damage. The City nuqr close to vdiicular use certain platted roadw^ if it is detennined that continued use will cause environmental hann. Ishmd lakcshore wOl be maintained in a natural state. Tree lemovalnear the lakeshore shall be as strictly regulated as it is in ril lakesliote areas of the City. Deerfaif bbud Deeiing Island is a small (approximately 4-5 acres) privately owned island in West Aim Bay, constituting a single tax parcel and having a angle owner. Many of the same issues, goals and policies perbining to Big Ishuid cany over to Deering Island. L. „ Complete Date: 60 Day Deadline: 2/5/02 4/6/02 TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator DATE:February 12,2002 SUBJECT: #02-2749 Thomas P. Egan, on behalf of all property owners 350, 360 and 370 Big Island Vacation of a portion of a dedicated Right-of-Way Zoning District:RS - Seasonal Recreational District List of Exhibits: A B C D E F Application Plat Map Survey Qwest Comments Reliant Energy/Minnegasco Property Owners Notification List Property Owners 350 Big Island 360 Big Island 370 Big Island Gary and Cynthia Craswell Thomas and Cheryl Egan Lowell and Gwendolyn Larson Application: Property owners have requested to vacate of a portion of platted “Massasoit Avenue”. Massasoit Avenue is undeveloped right of way on Big Island originally dedicated on the plat of Morse Island Park. Right of way has been used by Big Island residents and guests for interior pedestrian access to parts of the lakeshore and, periodically, for vehicular traffic for transporting materials for home construction and septic installation. The right of way is also used by utility companies for electric and phone service to the Island properties. There are two houses either fully inside or partially inside the Massasoit Avenue right of way that is proposed for vacation. Attached Exhibit C is a survey document the indicates the location of the right of way and structures. The City notifies all public utilities of the vacation request since they reserve the right to use public right of way for their facilities. Reliant Energy/Minnegasco responded that they have no facilities in the right-of-way. Qwest did notify the City that they do have existing facilities within the right of way and stated they respectfully decline the right of way vacation request. Please review the attached letter, dated February 6,2002, and maps provided by Qwest. •02-2749 HionutP.EtM 350,3«0Md370Bif blawl Fcbniaiy 13.2002 Pi(elof2 .. .....................1' r'fi Lake and Interior Land Acccs» Individual access to public rigltl of way is necessary to Big Island properties. The vacation of the right of way does not eliminate public access to each lot because each lot has access to the lakeshore and access to other right of way. The plat map shows each of the lots adjacent to other public land. Access to public right of way for other lots on the island would not change. According to information available to the City, property surveys and City topo maps, it does not appear any part of Massasoit Avenue or Metacomet Avenue have direct public access to the l^eshore. Staff Recommendation The property owners have the opportunity to negociate with Qwest to allow Qwest to use and access their facilities. Staffcannot support vacation of the Massasoit Avenue until Qwest and the property owners reach an agreement on how to allow continued access to the telephone facilities. This could be done by the property owners granting a public utility and access easement along the utility tines, or provide a private easement for Qwest for the service lines. The second option would be to have utilities relocated out of Massasoit Avenue. Either option would require all property owners and Qwest agreeing on a solution. Final approval of a vacation could be considered by the City only after resolution of the issue. Staff recommends the application be tabled until the issue w ith Qwest is resolved. Any future redevelopment of the properties would require new structures to have a minimum setback of 75' to the lakeshore. The survey indicates nearly all of Massasoit Avenue, proposed for vacation, is located within 75' of the lakeshore. Vacating the right of way will not allow fiirther development on those portions of the property. Public Hearing Required Staff did notice the hearing for the vacation request, for the Febrtiary 19, 2002 meeting of the Planning Commission. Notices were also mailed to all property owners within 350' of the property. Staff requests the Planning Commission open a public hearing for public comment. If the request is tabled the hearing will be continued to a future meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION OPTIONS FOR ACTION 1. Approve 2. Table 3. Deny, stating reasons 4. Other Action •02-2749 Thomas f. Egan 350.360 and 370 Big bland Fcbniwy 13.2002 Page 2 of 2 Inil I m n-I ■ ■ I II r ■ IF r i r1i ii■ .Ji Apniicaiion# Date Received l•ZJ^‘eZ A M I U.itRdd 42C0 CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPUCATION PROPERTY LOCATION She Address SS'O. 3c>0 ^ 370 Type of Application to be Filed Property Identification Number (PJ.D.) APPLICANT Name OJh A ET.4 CTAf Address ATOP hklAr.'^j^ Phone (horned ______ Phone (woric) *7^-^' Citvw>»y> _______Zip -TTJ ^ / OWNER Of different than applicant) Name ____________ Phone Otome), Phone (woric). Address City Zip. Date Pro I (do) (( Acquired «trc.A / 7 PP also own the adjacent parcels of land (month/year) FEES - CONDinONAL USE PERMITS > _____S 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application _____$175.00 Residential Accessory Use _____$250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _____$225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _____$200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $300.00 Commercial/Industrial Use _____$250.00 Land Alteration ____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain ____ Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more ____ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore _____PRD/PID - sec Fee Schedule _____$150.00 Renewal Fee (no change firom ori^al application) _____After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $250.00 C^ominercid Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) 1/^ $300.00 Vacatrori' ^ _____$200.00 Easeinent Vacation ^ $100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _____$350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _____$350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule #2749 2. 3.- > 7. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS !• Completed Application Form. Describe request in detail ’»•. hbeU and plat nup (you **"" ***“*l"“ County Depaitmant of Finance, A-603, Government Center, 348-3271). “«ncc, of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey Attach legd description to appUcation if not included on required survey ‘'"-'r-r-' SSTm S ® l»d -..rations involve .• .pplicanKs) if not current owner(s).Construction plan, if annlicable Tsee staflT fnr ^ 4. 5. 6. , r -I-_-.r- ----.' appucamisi I I Copstruction plan, if appUcable (sec staff for requirements) 9. As.an addendum to^s a^Ucation, please attach a separate Ust of any other persons you wish notified of this application ^ • • • YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY ^ ■" documents, plans, etc. to be f** appUcation. Please remember that yourapphcation is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use AppUcation is complete Initials of Clencal Staff;_____________________ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE S' SHSlf supphed IS true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. AppUcant’s signature —___________Date OWNER'S SIGNATURE Owner's signature Date /Ai/<02- AppUemt mua h.™ ni mbminri. the Ci» oBc» JS 4,. bdi« Ih. PInmin, Camabrio. Mwiag ApplKuattputtep^aUtt ri: S^St nuX yon Ptm. -I .rih: -V •• s- » • . a •• . r . “ •/ . T. g I/I Uiac CITY OF ORONO I I I • I I I • • I I nPi ■ .................................. • : . : ri(fe February 6,2002 fn 0 •I'-' Qwest Foul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Boy, MN 55323-0066 BE: Vacation of Public Right-of-way City File # 02-2749 bear Mr Weinberger Qwest Corporation has existing facilities in Right-of-way shown os Massasoit Avenue in letter dated 1-31-02. We must respectfully decline the Right-of- way vacation request. Sincerely, %ick Jorgensen Senior Design Engineer (763) 531-6385 9700 Schmidt Lake Road Room 344 Plymouth, Minnesota 55442 .-rfsc-CnW. r 3NTOCMTWJ, Dttclost ond Oittributt Sol«ly to 0«ts( Cmplort«i Mowing o lo Kno«. •inttd by Picfc Jorptnf n ot 07 25 on 06/rCB/200? t»om ih# londtof >n Hf«r* 'V ' lONflOCNTlAL Oitdott ond Oulributt So(«Ik <0 0«ttl tmplcytti Hotnng o Nttd to Kno«. . *. •• ilUiA 9J i %i 4#A|^ City File m-2749 Reliaot Eneqor Attn: Steve Von Bargen Real Estate Specialist 700 West Linden Avenue Minneapolis, MN SS440-II6S Xcel Energy Attn: Sharon M. Price Siting and Land Rights 414 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55401-1993 Wright Hennepin Electric Company P.O. Box 330 Rockford. MN 55373 Mcdiacom 1504 Street S.E. Waseca, MN 56093 Qwest 9700 Schmidt Lake Road Plymouth, MN 55442 :'3 F£3 0 7 • vj.'.t w- ^ - Verixon/GTE Telephone Operations 2378 Wiishire Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 City of Orono Attn: Greg Gappa, Public Services Director P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Date: Applicant: Request: Purpose: January 31,2002 Thomas Egan 1408 Holdridge Circle Wayzata, MN 55391 952-476-8376 The City of Orono has received a request by the owners of properties located at 350,360 and 370 Big Island to vacate a potion of undeveloped platted right-of-way. The right-of >way was dedicated, and shown as “Massasoit Avenue” on the original plat of Morse Island PariL The right-of-way on Big Island in undeveloped, but is open to allow property owners interior island access. The property owners primary reason to vacate the roads is that the individual houses are partly or fully within the public right of way. See attached Certificate of Survey. Comments: Any comments should be received by the City of Orono by February 18,2002. A public hearing to consider the vacation request is scheduled for Tuesday, February 19.2002. Cymmenta should be mailed or faxed to: Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066 Phone: 952-249-4600 fax: 952-249-4616__________________________________ Reliant Energy Minnegasco has no facilities within the above<iescribed area and has no objection to its vacation. Thank you for the advance notice. Steven Von Bargen V Right-Of-Way Administrator Reliant Energy Minnegasco * I 1. miN OATC U/lVIl NCNNfPlN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST REPORT NO. PX4SSAR1 PACE 4 ■ATCN SR2 % ONNEi NANC TAXPAYCR HAME/ADOff f HOP ADM OMNii NAM TAXPAYER NANE/AODR PROP ADOR OWCR NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOM PROP ADDR OWIER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR PROP ADM OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADM PROP ADM OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADM SO 2S-117-2S 52 filS tfSAO DIO ISLAND RXCNARD 0 HANSON NARILYN LATNAN A25 LAKE ST E WAYZATA NN S53Y1 30 23-117-23 32 0035 t03A0 DIO ISLAND RXCNARD G HANSON NARXLYN LATKAN A23 LAKE ST E WAYZATA HN 553Y1 30 23-117-23 32 ••37 ••37^ BIG ISLAND••370 BIG ISLAND / 6WENDDLYN S LARSON ETAL/LOArJOlTl vii « i AKiM iGWENDOLYN $ LARSON A50O JANES AVE S RICHFIELD NN 55A23 SO 23-117-23 32 ••3Y ••350 BIG ISLAND G W CRASWELL t C 0 CRASWELL GARY W I CYNTHIA D CRASWELL 34S1 CALLE QUATRO W OREiN VALLEY AZ BSAIA SO 23-117-23 32 •••• •R3AR BIG ISLAND RICHARD 6 HANSON RICHARD G HANSON 370 UNIVERSITY AVE W ST PAUL NN 551R3 SO 23-117-23 32 •••• ••310 BIO ISLAND NANCY LEE FARNES NANCY LEE FARNES 2710 FOXGATE M NINNETONKA NN S53R5 30 23-117-23 32 •••7 •0310 BIO ISLAND NANCY LEE FARNES NANCY LEE FARMS 2710 FOXGATE M NINNETONKA NN 553RS SO 23-117-23 32 •••• ••310 BIG ISLAND NANCY LEE FARNES NANCY LEE FARNES 271• FOXGATE OR NINNETONKA NN S5305 30 23-117-23 32 ROSS ••••• BIO ISLAND NANCY L GRANRUD ETAL ROBERT E GRANRUD !••• COLVIN AVE ST PAUL NN 55I1A 30 23-117-23 32 0057 ••3V0 BIG ISLAND ROBERT W BAILEY ETAL ROBERT W BAILEY 2700 HILLOALE AVE HE ST ANTHONY NN S5A1S 30 23-117-23 32 0050 ••3O0 BIG ISLAND KATHERINE SCRIVER ETAL JEANNETTE S BURCH BOX I CANNON FALLS NN 550RB 30 23-117-23 32 •••• 00360 BIG ISLAND T P EGAN OCA EGAN THONAS P EGANATHERYL A EGAN 1600 HOLDRIOGE CXR WAYZATA NN S5301 3B 23-117-23 32 0061 00320 BIG ISLAND JOIRI S DEAN JOHN S DEAN •37 N 63RD ST WAUWATOSA WX 53213 30 23-117-23 32 0063 00620 BIG ISLAND H B FRUEN I R H FRUEN NICHAEL FRUEN •011 13TH AVE N NPLS NN 55661 3« 23-117-23 32 O065 00610 BIG ISLAND RICHARD W FRUEN ET AL GREGORY B O’CONNOR 1025 06TH ST W UPPER INVER GROVE HEIGHTS NN 55077 30 23-117-23 32 0066 00330 BIG ISLAND JOHN ALLEN EXDEN JOHN ALLEN EXDEN P O BOX 26 530 BIG ISLAND EXCELSIOR NN 55331 30 23-117-23 32 0067 00630 BIG ISLAND ELIZABETH ANN MENNAN TINOTNY C LOVETT 12600 NARXON LN W 03306 NINNETONKA NN 55305 30 23-117-23 32 0071 00660 BIG ISLAND W L 0 P A THORKELSON W L 0 P A THORKELSON 740O GOLDEN VALLEY » R200 GOLDEN VALLEY NN 55627 hi•. n Application Date: 1/23/02 Completion Date: 1/23/02 60 Day Deadline: 3/20/02 noMMrii FEB 2 5 2002 IY 0»* Onv^i'iv^ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: Name Wendy Bottenberg Title Zoning Adminstrator/Planner DATE: 2/20/02 ITEM NO.: Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #02-2750 Edward and Michelle Winer 2010 Shoreline Drive - Variance Zoning Dbtrict: Lot Area: List of Exhibits: A Resolution B Staff Report and Exhibits of 2/19/2002 LR-1A One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 acre) 59,623 s.f. (1.37 acres) Application Summary: The applicants applied for a building permit and it was determined the proposal needed an average lakeshore setbaick variance. The applicants are proposing to construct an addition to the existing residence. The addition consists of an attached 2 stall garage with a bedroom above it. The garage is the same level as the existing basement. The new bedroom will be on the first floor above the garage. The applicants are also proposing to construct a deck on the lake side of the residence. The property is a comer lot. Therefore, to meet the intent of the average lakeshore setback requirement, the residence must be set back from the lake at least as far as the only adjacent residence. Pertinent Code Section: 1. Section 10.22.Subd. 1 (B)and Section 10.56.Subd. 16(C)(6): Average Lakeshore Setback: The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lake ward protmsions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. Variance Request: To pemiit a variance to encroach 10' into the average lakeshore setback. PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 6 to 0 vote to: Approve the application as presented. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the enclosed resolutioii COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution. L„-•V >1.« Ml , A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1(B) AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C) (6) FILE NO. 02-2750 WHEREAS, Edward Winer and Michelle Winer, (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the propert>’ located at 2010 Shoreline Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the applicants have applied for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1(B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C)(6) to allow encroachment of 10' into the average lakeshore setback to permit an addition and deck to be constructed. WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on Februarv ’ 19,2002, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #02-2750. The prc\>erty is located in the LR-IA, Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District, where 87,120 s.f. or 2 acre is the minimum required lot area. The property consists of approximately 59,623 s.f or 1.37 acres. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 19,2002 and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: Page 1 of 7 A. The addition meets lot coverage by structures, yard setbacks and hardcover requirements for the property. B. The residence was built prior to current lakeshore regulations. C. If the street was not between this property and the next lakeshore property to the north along Shoreline Drive, the residence would be behind the average lakeshore setback. The residences to the north are closer to the lake than this property. D. Neighbors' views of the lake will not be negatively impacted by the addition or deck. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary’ to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserv e a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1(B) and Section 10 56, Subdivision 16(C) (6) to allow encroachment of 1 O' into the average lakeshore setback to permit an addition and deck to the existing residence, subject to the following conditions; 1. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants attached to this Page 2 of? resolution as Exhibit B. Any amendments to the site plan may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2.Authorities granted by the variances run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or these variances will expire on that date (February 25,2003). 3.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of the variances shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4.The undersigned owners have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of February, 2002. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owners STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day of February, 2002 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Page 3 of7 Ij notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN day ofThe foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _______ , 200 ____by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota^................ . ^ municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of .,20. personally appeared before me, ____ who is personally known to me ____ whose identity I proved on the basis of. whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation witness ,a credible and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of .,20. personally appeared before me, ____who is personally known to me ____whose identity 1 proved on the basis of, Page 4 of? whose identity 1 proved on the oath/affirmation witness a credible and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of? Exhibit A All that part of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter and Government Lot 3, Section 10, Township 117, North Range 23 West of the 5* Principal Meridian described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest comer of Lot 6 of Elbridge S. Barnes' First Subdivision in Section 10 To'vnship 117 Range 23; thence Southeasterly along the Southerly line of said Lot 6 a distance of 2*^i.08 feet to a point said point being the tme point of beginning of the property being described; thence deflecting Ri^t at an angle of 90 degrees to a point in a line, said line being parallel to and 207.08 feet distant from the Southerly line of aforesaid Lot 6; thence Southeasterly along said parallel line to the shoreline of Lake Miimetonka; thence Northeasterly along said shoreline to its intersection with the Southerly line of aforesaid Lot 6; thence Northwesterly along said Southerly line to the true point of begiiming; EXCEPT that part of the Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter and Government Lot 3 of Section 10 Township 117 Range 23, Described as follows: Commencing at a point on the Southerly line of Lot 6 of Elbridge S. Barnes’ First Subdivision, distance 295.08 feet Southeasterly from the Southwest comer thereof; Thence Southwesterly at right angles from said Southerly line 30 feet to the Southwesterly right of way line of Central Avenue, said point being the point of beginning of the property being described; thence continuing Southwesterly at right angles from said Southerly line 102.31 feet; thence deflecting left 90 degrees a distance of SO feet; thence deflecting left 90 degrees a distance of 102.31 feet to said Southwesterly right of way line; thence Northwesterly to the point of begiiming, according to the United States Government Survey thereof, and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Page b of 7 liSlIEIIItt■mnii —3to.B — •4» Csr^r #/ JL*/ C , f5T, I C B/^T/^A k Z- //>TA .AVBKfUB / Ui ^ • l«j •Jll.. S ncf" f9arf90^f TVfc ^n/y /« Cee^s/imCA ^ ytaWin^ /^4» J»l* / y {^ //>7e C^c^fro/ AvCm II \ ^ //>>* ^0^0 f/a / UTz/Xr 5«»v/A /#^c « / S/hri'c^^m s. ^0^-r>«4* 3w60^iy0S/cr9 1 h«r«by certify th«t this it a true end correct repreaentation of e survey of the boundaries oft All that part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 and Goveritfient Lot 3 of Section 10, T117H« R23tf, described as follows I Coostencinu at a point on the Southerly line of Lot S of Blbridqe S. Sarnes* First Subdivision distant 320.01•• • **•• •• • bCN DCSCS2FT All that part of the Nor- and Government Lot 3« Sec 23 Nest of the Sth Frinc. Cnssnencine at the Soutbe* S. larnes^ First Sobdivi Ranfo 23} thence Southea. of said Lot S a distance / 6 TO: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Wendy Bottenberg. Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE: February 14,2002 SUBJECT:/II02-27S0 Edward & Michelle Winer 2010 Shoreline Drive Variance -- Public Hearing LR«I A One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 acre) 59.623 s.f. (1.37 acres) Zoning Dbtrict: Lot Area: Lbt of Exhibits: A Anal> sis Worksheet B Application C Survey/Site Plan D Floor Plans/ elevations E Average lakeshore setback (Topographic Map) F Photos of Property G Hardcover Worksheet H Plat Map I Propert>' Owner’s List Application Summary: The applicants applied for a building permit and it was determined that the proposal needed an average lakeshore setback variance. The applicants are proposing to construct an addition to the existing residence. The addition consists of an attached 2 stall garage with a bedroom above it. The garage is the same level as the existing basement. The new bedroom will be on the first floor above the garage. The applicants are also proposing to construct a deck to the lake side of the residence. The subject property is a comer lot. In this case, average lakeshore setback is determined by measuring the distance of the residences from the ordinary highwater mark of the lake for both properties, rather than the straight line between the most lakeward protmsions of the residence buildings. If one of the residences is closer to the OHWL, as in this case, average lakeshore setback is an issue. The adjacent residence to the south is a comer lot also, and is oriented with its driveway off North Shore Drive. These two residences were used to determine the average lakeshore setback for the property (See Exhibit E). Pertinent Code Sections: 1. Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (B)and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(C)(6): Average Lakeshore Setback: The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. Variance Request: To permit a variance to encroach 10' into the average lakeshore setback. #02-27S0 Edward/Michelte Winer 2010 Shoreline Drive Variance 2/8.2002 Page lof2 Statement of Hardship: The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit B. The applicant should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Issues for Consideration: 1.The addition meets lot coverage by structures, yard setbacks and hardcover requirements for the property. 2. 3. The original existing house was built prior to lakeshore regulations. The shape of the shoreline makes it difficult for this property to meet the average lakeshore setback. 4.If the street was not between this property and the next lakeshore property to the north along Shoreline Drive, the residence would be behind the average lakeshore setback. The residences to the.north are closer to the lake than this property. 5. 6. Neighbors ’ views of the lake will not be negatively impacted by the addition or deck. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation: Staff reconunends approval of the average lakeshore setback variance to construct the addition and deck to the existing residence. »02-27S0 Edward/Michelle Winer 2010 Shoreline Drive Variuce 2/1/2002 Page 2 of 2 i ANALYSIS WORKSHEET LR-IA Lot Area Required 2 Acre Actual 1.37 Acres Hardcover CalculaHons Distance from shoreline Total area in setback Allowed hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover 75-250’37,735 s.f.9,433.75 s.f. (25%) 1,514 s.f (4.01%) 3,554.75 s.f (9.42%) 250-500’21,935 s.f.6,580.5 s.f. (30%) 5,889 s.f (26.8%) 5,559 s.f (25.3%) Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 59,623 s.f Allowed: 8,943.5 s.f 15% Existing: 2,236 s.f 3.8% Proposed: 4,276.75 s.f 7.1% 5 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 (S50.(W per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for hon-confonning structures $250.00 After>the*Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address Short,Q^ioc._______________ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 1^l-OOOl ... . . • • • • • ■ Applicalioa # 02.* Itate Received 1-1.5" 02. Amount Paid ^ 2.S O Attach legal description to applic^icm if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired_____________________________________ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Pi^nt use of property: residential ___pother (specify)________ Zoning District: L—^ - I _________________________ ,(month/year) Address! 7,0 fO Sl^ort^li/u. Citv: O^vn o__________Zip:_s;yw_ V:--. OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _____________________ Phone (homeX Phone (work)_ Address:City:.Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ loo,caoo»oo Describe request in detail: 2 CAT uiiHv \^AroOi^v\ (attach additional sheets if necessary)7 VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area _ Setback: ___Lot Width Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) hardship /description of unusual property conditions Describe undue hardship or practical diflRculty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance ,with Zoning Code requirements: jjyvj r*heux\d.rpi c( _ Q.rrttn4i4 SU c^r eawiif -h. WL 0^ .n- bdrwv. Wl WAtAOfl ' 6 REQUIRED SUBMITTALS ld> I ^P All of the following information must be aubmitted bv the applicarinn dgadling iii order for your application to be comidgred compigtg; I. Completed Application Fonn ^ __ of owners withii^S^______ must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-5910). (,ia> ^ll 3. Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover WLvI^" calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/i" x 11" for * ^ reproduction. 4.. ohjMe Topographic survey (e.xisting and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing l>f\t grade are proposed. In addition,.provide one (1) copy 8!4" x 11" for reproduction. 5. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 814" x II"), List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons tvith an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). 7- __ As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. __ Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour yaiian« application not wmpklt if.the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant e.xpenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his-lier knowledge. Date OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledps and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Date f/^o/oQ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planiung Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled revieiv meetings of the Planning Commission and .CounciL If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meetins .. ■ • > > , / r- V -K.) ' > • •• • • - . • 1 •.A. I Winer Residence IfaiMlilmkhgiMaa rmn iMtm RJJohnsonArcfilt«otur« 4 im«rtor% Inam mmm Gmy SvtjcM Noim OarwrAl Nmm n^.“•“nzrr-“ —zi’ziinrrznT ~SL---- • ir r.ru:siTtj'-its ■ — Si:r^7 »•••«• -------------------------^ ---- SKSTSSCVIT**------- “~kV1=»==‘' s;.-s7^£.--------- ;grgjL'__y ____ SiSs«rr ——* sjSirIar;;tgr?JI! ausagggrirzr a=p =^— ivTCwgaa-’^sis «SSi sss.Tir; • ti t*i I« OT • %««i «W« •« « w m “: ■ s^=araTSS.-^^2I^r!L!r, t SR^-ar*- ssTTcanar —-a* ^S«9^2B^«S******SS**'* ******* **'^**** ***”**«S%Cm^^ ■■MW « -SUf4lQ^I :5SS=rayp Sr •^sCIaoi +.-y^^ o7r/s^ (./%• ,r\ \M V> — T9^.s$ - •4- C^rser #/ • i S. S^rf9e,%* ^irtf IMS IIU MS KU mcrofhiied &w//^ //^^ C£^A/T'/^AL^ .a\/bk /ub I Sot^4^ C^Cnfro/ Avc. Jii *•1 ^t / ITC f*f - J>/. J — ▼ / ^ ^ /'/?« S*»w/A //^e S <✓ 3o^/f'/jE/Jo ^ /! f • NDf DCJCRZFT 5 dra\s/f*t^ c/om^ ncf‘ furf^orf /’C. <y ^/* /.4« ein itrc, TVre c n/y Y^y/ /B /o »*r» ^/7#^//^4M I b«r«by certify th«t this it • true and correct rtpr«i«ntttion of t turvoy of tho boundarUi ofi All thot part of tho Northoott 1/4 of tho Southwoit 1/4 tnd Covormnt Lot 3 of toction 10« T117N« R33M, dotcrlbod at followft Copwancing at a point on tho Southorly lino of Lot 4 of Elbridoo S« larnoo* Fitat Subdlviaion diatant 330.0I • » kM. «» •• • ••.. •• • All that part of tho Kor* and 6ovomMHt Lot 3« Soi 23 Moat of tho Sth Frinc. Cooaiaiicino at tho Southoi S. larooa^ Firat Sobdlvi han^o 33t thooco tootSioa. of aaid Lot % a diatanct o. ■ ir lilii fcM I ft IT I . . I f -— -Hi Cl ID I'lff— iiip W-n.Hi ii i¥, lIBHIl :!!k^Hi' JiiJ IU.r‘""_jl______________IL-------^l-lj i|! •ll.------------ ■fHif 1! IllllliftUiiilllIlGBiOm I ! I tTT I "imi immmm 11 [ I j ii'i "WW i tiLk itiAriliiki \r) (g>*... mm kSn « ^aussai i; w»*«r :sr»M25— •• srs^^ M -KJitatipjiao!!—BMMiBi BV9 3=: • »r .-• -•.\U .1 •« • --------»-.lyi ----- 92f.t 9 mm3n-r Wa ■if C-X - J.-7SC •^L fC c A/1»- '()('. '■i > *’■' •f»-- u< rv-' •J •!-m \^1_> ^ I- 7r^:'Ain-Wl 1! *». , . L%^cji '\ W4^rr r > *, ' /' * • . 'j4f ^ * • *• » . • • ^ I SABDCOVER CALCULATigr' ^ SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE <K<E) 0-75* RKSHEET 250^00* G 500.1000* A. Hoom U«cft % X X B. -Owie ' • • • Driveway D. SidewaOc E. Patio/DecV F. Ludscape Uaderiain By Plutie Or Fri)ric • •• .t «•••■- •• • ... • • ^ SJf. • S.F. SJ. S.F. X- X X X X X X X X S.F.• 5.1F. S.F. 5.F. S.F. ^//3 S.F. S.F. SJ. "S.F. "SJ. O. Odier I5f4 S.F. S.F.TOTAL HABDCOVER IN ZONE - SP total PROmjrAHEAIN.222^ *>00 proposed habpcover in zone A. House Ixzlix Wldt^ X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. B. Garage C. Driveway D. .Sidewalk • • E. Paslo/Deck F; Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Friirie O. Other X X X X X X X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. r i lO. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. total HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOI«.P|^B X XOO •“ ...JRDCOVER CALCULATION WC XSHEET SETBACK ZCKflEt (ClRCtEONE) 0-75’ 75-250’ O50-S00’Q 500-1000’ yyf griNC HARDCOVER IW ZONE A. Houie ______■ Liaffi Wkiih X X X •* * *.• ' • B. Omge ••.^3 i At>Ji . • .t .• •• • • • C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Pacto/Deck X X X X X G. Odier TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROmTY AREA IN ZONEmai+. B n ICO . PROPOSED BABDCOVER IN ZONE ' A. House X Le:|:h Wlddi X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X X X X X X mm • O. other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE ONE‘ ^ - ♦ B XlOO - TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A OL M3. ai S.P. S.F. S.P. S.F. S.F. S.V, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ^"^3 < * S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. U A B S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.t i ; 1 IMiepin Cbunly Taxp^ * T 4* an 9 ^ • a rt7; 431.1 I 4 C / ^•' ' f3;V ' / 4046 / > ' «S' 0 W jrrff ./ ' / . N> ' r\ io-/n~ x^ — PwxikSonvBiaM^ C% l Mied 10 lOliTm^wm' . ??!??’ Houm Number2010 : ' ' *'.* ' OtTMt Nam* OHOIliUNi OR ** TNsisnci9hg^noonMnwfi.llnpnmtti§oon}fMienefirknmBon and data komOty, Oourfy. andSU^nadmdhoiUmandadmaounaa.. «.!• tv c \ v;T3i Otu RUN DATE ti/EE/IE •ATCN 5R2 Homnn county rtopERTY iivoimATioN systen RROfERTV OWNERS LIST RERORT NO. RXASSAII PAGE 9 PROP ADOR OWNER NAHE TARPAYER NANE/AODR SD lt-117-2S 31 •OtI 1201# SNORELXNE DR NICNELLE NARXE HUOSON-NXLLER NICNELLE NARIE HUDSON-HXLLER 2010 SHORELINE DR WAY2ATA m 55391 SS 10-117-23 31 0002 02040 NORTH SHORE DR K t L ERICKSON KEITH R ERICKSON 2040 NORTH SHORE DR WAV2ATA HN 55391 3B 10-117-23 31 0003 02040 NORTH SHORE DR L G GODFREY I N J GODFREY LYLE C I NORNA J GODFREY 2040 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA HN 55391 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 30 10-117-23 31 0005 01390 RAILROAD AVE OLAI HANSON ETAL OLAX HANSON BOX 129 CRYSTAL DAY HN 55323 30 10-117-23 31 0004 01300 RAILROAD AVE SHARON V EVANS SHARON V EVANS 1300 RAILROAD AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 30 10-117-23 31 0007 01340 RAILROAD AVE TIHOTHY J PAHRIN SR TIHOTHY JON PATTRIN SR 1340 RAILROAD AVE PO BOX 51 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323 PROP ADOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 30 10-117-23 31 0000 02055 SPATES AVE NARXETTA H ANDERSON ET AL HARXETTA H ANDERSON 2055 SPATES AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 30 10-117-23 31 0020 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 44 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323 SO 10-117-23 31 0090 02040 SPATES AVE HARY A STINSON HARY A STINSON 2040 SPATES AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR SO 10-117-23 31 0094 02040 SPATES AVE HARRIET SPATES TOURANGEAU HARRIET SPATES TORANGEAU 2040 SPATES AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 30 10-117-23 34 0010 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED VIL OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO PO BOX 44 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323 SO 10-117-23 34 0011 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ROY E AHERN HENNEPIN COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY 417 5TH ST N 0320 HINNEAPOLIS HN 55401 1 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAIS/ADDR 30 10-117-23 34 0012 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CITY OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 44 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323 SO 10-117-23 34 0013 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ROY E AHERN ROY AHERN 1120 FRONT ST HUDSON WI 54014 30 10-117-23 42 0012 01950 SHORELINE DR NARIA LUISA CASTELLON HARXE L CASTELLON 1950 SHORELINE DR WAYZATA HN 55391 PROP ADOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 30 10-117-23 42 0021 01900 SPATES AVE D CREAR 0 H B CREAR DANIEL CREAR 1900 SPATES AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 SO 10-117-23 42 0022 01940 SHORELINE OR DANIEL B NARY CREAR DANIEL B HARY CREAR 1900 SPATES AVENUE WAYZATA HN 55391 30 10-117-23 42 0023 01990 SPATES AVE TIHOTHY E BLANKENSHIP TIHOTHY BLANKENSHIP 1990 SPATES AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 ^■2 ;••••/ i •» *.■ /O' u H ; TTi •“ Tirnnn rim iiii~imfr i iVnV-ti f>ri- . -i ‘rt > n inr-rTT--*^ RUN DATE ti/22/i2 DATCH St2 HENNEPIN COUNTY PfraPCRTY XNFORNATION SYSTEN PROPERTY ONNERS LIST PROP AOOR OHNit NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AODR St lt*U7-2S A2 0124 •1955 SHORELINE OR MRY DESANTIS DARY DESANTIS SAILORS HORLD INC 1955 SHORELINE DR* HAVZATA HN 55391 i %, f;', •) . • • ’**.*•>. 1 *... j •I V M ^• 4f; . • #f V : .• •• •• ^ L REPORT NO. PltSSttl PAOE It TOTAL DATCH 552 Itllt 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS I 1 % * I ifIrt-rM rtrtii I I iiMiwrft'htwntur in mmirtTlBi tiUnnr iltnniMT'^n.iiti I I f Complete Date: 60 Day Deadline: 1/23/02 3/20/02 FEB 2 5 2002 Out urOHOiw REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: February 20.2002 ITEM NO.: ^I Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator Adminbtrator Reviewed:Agenda Sectioo: Zoning Item Description:#02-2751 Mark Welsh/Robert and Colleen Eberle 3625 North Shore Drive Variances Zoning District:LR-IC - Single Family Lakeshore Residential District List of Exhibits A B Resolution/Site Plan Planning Report (February 12,2002) Application Mr. Welsh holds the property by a Contract for Deed. He has requested variances to permit removal of the existing house and construction of a new house. The new house would be a two bedroom/two bathroom home with a one stall “tuck under" garage space. Access to this property and 5 others is via a private, shared driveway that accesses North Shore Drive. The private driveway is located across the back of the individual lots. The applicant ’s property is the 4"' of 6 properties that require the drive for access. The driveway is required because the public road is located at a much higher elevation than the properties below. According to Hennepin County records the existing house was constructed in 1920. The house is 599 s.f. in size. The new house would allow' the property owners to have additional living space and one garage stall. Currently the property does not have a garage. The proposed house would be located the same distance from the driveway as the current house. Please refer to the attached survey that show s the location of the house. Due to the small size of the lot, the driveway location, and elevation change between the roadway above and the lot it is not possible to rebuild on the property without requiring variances. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the application based on the hardships noted in the attached resolution. Approval is conditioned upon the following: 1.Drainage and Utility easements shall be provided 10* along the north property line and 5' along the interior property lines. Itia rtlif III II 1 11 111 11 1 ' I •mr..-----------i..n .ii .. ------------JLI-1 UUBG 1 A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (B); SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2; SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) 1 AND 2; SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8; AND SECTION 10.61, SUBDIVISION 5 (A) FILE NO. 01-2751 WHEREAS. Mark Welsh, (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the propert>' by a Contract for Deed, and Robert Hberle and Colleen Eberle, are o>wiers (hereinafter “the o\vners") of the property located at 3625 North Shore Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision No. 263,1 lennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions I and 2, Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 and Section 10.56. Subdivisions 16 (L) I and 2 to permit 615 s.f. (16.4%) hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback where 660 s.f (17.6%) hardcover e.xists and no hardcover is allowed, and to permit 884 s.f. (5 1 .6%) hardcover in the 75-250 ’ setback where 932 s.f. (54.4%) hardcover exists and 428 s.f. (25%) hardcover is allowed: Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit new construction on the lot with a defined lot area of 5.462 s.f. where 21,780 s.f is required and a lot width of 50 ’ where 100' is required, and to permit a side yard setback of 5 ’ for the house where a 10 ’ setback is required; and Section 10.61, Subdivision 5 (A) to permit one off-street parking space to be located 3’ from the adjacent property line where off-street parking in “R” districts is required to be set back 10 ’; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 19, 2002, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: Page 1 of 7 1. 3. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #02-2751 The property is located in the LR-IC, Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District where '/i acre is the minimum lot size and 100 feet is the minimum lot width. The property is 5,462 s.f. (absent the traveled portion of the shared driveway) and has a lot width of 50'. The Planning Commission reviewed the application for variances and recommended approval by a vote of 6 to 0 based on the following findings and hardships: A.The City of Orono has routinely granted variances to lot area and lot width for redevelopment on non-conforming lots in the City. The property does meet the criteria that is normally considered when reviewing such proposals. The property is connected to sanitary sewer and the house would be located in an area above the regulatory flood plain. B. C. Overall hardcover on the property would decrease. The land elevation is about 4 ’ higher than the ordinary high water level of Lake Minnetonka. The lot cannot accommodate a basement. D.The new house is proposed to be located 53' from the lakeshore where a 75' setback is required. Both adjacent houses are within 50' of the lakeshore. The new house is located to meet the minimum 50' lakeshore setback as required by the DNR. DNR staff has reviewed the plans and stated they do not have any requirements on the development based on the building being located outside the 50' setback. E.The house proposed can not meet a 75* setback due to the location of the shared driveway access on the property. The house is located to within 2' of the edge of the drive. Page 2 of 7 1 d F.The 5' side setback has been requested to provide one additional parking space on the property. The Zoning Code requires residential properties to have 2 ofF-street parking spaces. To accommodate a second parking space next to the house, a side setback variance is required because the house is shitted towards the west side property line. The parking stall must be located between the house and side property line due to the shared driveway located behind the house. The driveway is narrow and permanent parking w ithin the driveway area would block through traffic. No parking is available on the opposite side of the shared driveway as the land immediately begins to rise to the elevation of North Shore Drive. H.A typical parking space in a commercial area is 9' X 20’ in size. The proposed parking area would be approximately 10’ X 20’. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances w ill not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air. nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely seiA e as a conv enience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findir ?s and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2, Section 10.55. Subdivision 8 and Section 10.56, Subdivisions 16 (L) 1 and 2 to permit 615 s.f. (16.4%) hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback where 660 s.f, (17.6%) hardcover exists and no hardcover is allowed, and to permit 884 s.f. (51.6%) hardcover in the 75-250 ’ setback where 932 s.f. (54.4%) hardcover exists and 428 s.f. (25%) hardcover is allowed; Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit new construction on the lot with a defined lot area of 5,462 s.f. where 21,780 s.f. is required and a lot w idth of 50' where 100' is required, and to permit a side yard setback of 5' for the house where a 10' Page 3 of 7 siisaaac ------ setback is required; and Section 10.61, Subdivision 5 (A) to permit one off-street parking space to be located 3' from the adjacent property line where off-street parking in “R” districts is required to be set back 10’ subject to the following conditions; 1. 2. 3. 5 8 Drainage and Utility easements shall be provided 10* along the north property line and 5* along the interior property lines. The existing shed and all hardcover proposed for removal is completed prior to a final inspection. Gravel shall be removed from the parking area to leave a minimum 3' setback to the property line. Final drainage plans shall be reviewed by the City Engineer to ensure drainage is properly directed. The property shall be developed in conformance with the site plan attached as Exhibit A. Authorities granted by the variances run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be e.xercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or these variances will expire on that date (February' 25. 2003). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of the variances shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned owners have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Page 4 of 7 ^ U-: t fir,. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of February, 2002. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Fee Owners Applicant STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day of February, 2002 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN day ofThe foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this_______ ___________200 ______by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 7 j STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of .,20. personally appeared before me, ____who is personally known to me ____ whose identity I proved on the basis of, whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation witness .a credible and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of .,20. personally appeared before me, ____who is personally known to me ____whose identity I proved on the basis of whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation witness ,a credible and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/lhey executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public Page 6 of 7 II Exhibit A 9i EXiSTMG HOUSE IVEO) ie.oV\ U <ACRAVa T< i\ r^pou^ % CMUficn, \ PROPpSED\ ' r----1 iT^HOUSE I............. CRAVa —TO BE •VCO 6iJ€K t: 28.0 ►•••••••*• (»M.6y ^ 9'i^ '«•••* ^9324) I (932.6) ^ SURVEY qjt ...... Page 7 of 7 hiaaiai' /2 Completion Date: 60 Day Deadline: 1/23/02 3/20/02 TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:February 12,2002 SUBJECT: #01-2751 Mark Welch 3625 North Shore Drive Variances - Public Heating Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IC O ik Family Lakeshore Residential District (1/2 acre) 6,615 s.f. - (5,462 s.f. when the shared driveway is removed from the lot area) List of Exhibits: A B C D E F G H I J Application Applicant Description of Request'Hardship Statements Plat Map Existing Propeny Survey Proposed Site Plaa'Survey Hardcover Calculation Worksheets Floor Plans/Elevation Sketches Site "Neighborhood Topography City Engineer Comments (February 6.2002) Property Owners Notification List Application Summary: The applicant holds the property by a Contract for Deed. He has requested variances to i'ermit removal of the e.xisting house and construction of a new house. The new house would be a two bedrooin/two bathroom home with a one stall “tuck under ’ garage space. Access to this property and 5 others is via a private, shared driveway that accesses North Shore Drive. The private driveway is located across the back of the individual lots. The applicant's property is the 4"' of 6 properties that require the drive for access. The driveway is required because the public road is located at a much higher elevation than the properties below. According to Hennepin County records the existing house was constructed in 1920. The house is 599 s.f. in size. The new house would allow the property owners to have additional living space and one garage stall. Currently the property does not have a garage. The proposed house would be located the same distance from the drivew ay as the current house. Please refer to the attached survey that shows the location of the house. Due to the small size of the lot, the driveway location, and elevation change between the roadway above and the lot it is not possible to rebuild on the property without requiring variances. Below is a summary of pertinent ordinances that require variance review. tlOI-27SIMi(k Welch 3625 Noilh Shore Drive Febni«yl9,2002 Page I of 4 Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.25. Subdivision 6 (B): Variances requested to lot area and lot width to permit construction of a new residence on the property in the LR-IC district less than '/i acre and 100' width. The defined lot area, absent the private driveway area, is 5.462 s.f The defined lot width is ^ at the lakeshore and defined structure setback. The City of Orono has routinely granted variances to lot area and lot width for redevelopment on non-conforming lots in the City. The property does meet the criteria that is normally considered when reviewing such proposals. The property is connected to sanitary sewer and the house would be located in an area above the regulatory flood plain. Section 10.55. Subdivision 8. Section 10.22. Subdivisions 1 and 2. and Subdivision 10.56. Subdivision 16 (U1 and 2: Variances requested for hardcover and structure within 75* of the lakeshore, where no hardcover or structure is allowed, and a variance to permit greater than 25% hardcover in the 75-250' of the lakeshore. Total Area 0-75' = 3,750 s.f. Allowed 0-75' = 0 s.f. Proposed 0-75' = 615 s.f. (16.4%) Existing 0-75' = 660 (17.6%) Total Area 75-250' - 1,712 s.f. * Does not include 1,153 s.f. of shared driveway Allowed 75-250' = 428 s.f. Proposed 75-250' = 884 s.f. (51.6%) Existing 75-250' = 932 (54.4%) Overall hardcover on the property would decrease, however a greater percentage of the hardcover would be for the house. The size of the existing house is 599 s.f the proposed house would be 1,176 s.f. The land elevation is about -4' higher than the ordinary high water level of Lake Minnetonka. The lot cannot accommodate a basement. The new house is proposed to be located 53'from the lakeshore where a 75' setback is required. Both adjacent houses are within 50' of the lakeshore. The new house is located to meet the minimum 50'lakeshore setback as required by the DNR. DMR staff has reviewed the plans and stated they do not have any requirements on the development based on the building being located outside the 50' setback. *01-2751 Mark Welch 3625 Nofth Shore Drive Februiry 19. 2002 Page 2 of4 3 section 10.2S, SiiMivision 6 Variances requested to allow encroachment into the 10’ side/rear yard setbacks, and to permit the house to be located 5' from the west side property line. Required Side Setback =10' Proposed = 5' west property line The proposed house has one garage stall proposed within the house. The 5'side setback has been requested to provide one additional parking space on the property. The Zoning Code requires residential properties to have 2 off-street parking spaces. To accommodate a second parking space next to the house, a side setback variance is required because the house is shifted towards the west side property line. The parking stall must be located between the house and side property line due to the shared driveway located behind the house. The driveway is narrow and permanent parking within the driveway area would block through traffic. No parking is available on the opposite side of the shared driveway as the land immediately begins to rise to the elevation of North Shore Drive. A typical parking space in a commercial area is 9\X 20' in size. The proposed parking area adjacent to the house is approximately 13'X 20'. 4. Section 10.61 Subdivision 5 (A): To permit one off-street parking stall to be located 3' from an interior side property line where off-sueet parking is required to be located 1 O' from a side property line. Please refer to discussion above. Review of Hardships: Applicant’s hardships are noted in the attached hardship statements. To summarize the hardships, the four main problem areas are, the access road, lot size, and limited parking. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the application based on the hardships noted. A recommendation of approval is conditioned on the following: 1. Drainage and Utility casements shall be provided 1 O' along the north lot line and 5' along the interior property lines. 2. A final grading plan shall be submitted prior to review of the request by the City Council. DO t-2751 Mark Welch 362SNoitbShofc Drive Febnwy 19.2002 P^3of4 3. The existing shed and all hardcover proposed for removal is completed prior to a final inspection. 4.Gravel shall be removed from the proposed parking area to leave a minimum 3' setback to the property line. Pianniiiy Commission Options for Action A.Approve B.Deny C.Table D.Other Action 101-2751 Maik Welch 3625 Nonh Shore Drive Fcbniiiyl9,2002 pi«t4or4 i A CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION ^)lnitial Application Fee S2S0.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee SI 50.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non*confonning structures S2S0.00 After-tbe>Fact Fees (Double application fee) Appttcalion# 02.-2T7^i Date Received Amount Paid ^ ZSTO APPLICANT . . Kame""mA^g.Vl \^l5LCH Phone (home) __ ____ Phone fwork ^ - Y/. <T 9^ Address: CityiUOoLi^garto^_____Zip:lSS3SLL— Phone (home ) ^ 1.2OWNER (if differmt than applicant) rnoae cnome ) ~iti~ -tiak Name'^mftdCft^MA) ^biAXjU____________Phone (wcujk),^__________ AddreMnXl^lTbl<-cio"BW\D^-RL.Uf^. Citv:VoM Zip: c DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: Sea.. oAtoue ka.<L> VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area _ (attach additional sheets if necessary ) Setback: ___Lot Width Front Lot CoverageHardcover Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSMIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual propertv conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: Saa, QiJiiaLg>}saJL _______ (attach additional sheets if necessary) / ! ; / / ’ 1 >Ca A REQUIRED SUBMITTALS AU.of tht foWoHing infprmatwn muat hr lubmitted bv th* deadline d.*» u flcdtr for Ycur iDPlicarton to be con«id«ri.d grauimt qiTf in L 2) 5. 6. y' Completed Application Fonn Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one copy 8vi" x 11" for reproduction. Tc^graphic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are projwsed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/i" x 11" for reproductior! ke ches or plans of floor & eleVadon views (provide one (1) copy 8'/a" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with'an interest iii A A™* nanie(s) of applicant!s) if not current owner(s). As an addendwn to Ais application, please attach a seperate list of any other persons you uish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. oiriintt ippiitiiMin fi)mDi.te if'ihl^"h!!‘v^ APPLIC^T'S .SIGNATURE to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning mmislrator. agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered bv original fee payment) application.'and certifies that Linformation supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature - Pate OWNER’S SIGNATURE acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Otvner’s Signature __Date /— Applicml mua toe all submittala into the City offices 25 days before the Plansuiig Cession Meett^. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each jT ^ V. tf i% t CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION ^)lnidal Application Fee S250.00 (SSO.OO per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee S150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non>confonning structures S2S0.00 Afrer-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) AmUkaaktaU 0Z-27S ‘J DateRecdved, 1*2.3^02. Amount Paid 4 ZS~0 PROPERTY INFORMATIOiy Site Property Identification Number (PJ.D.) aG09 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired ______________________ I (do) ^ono^also own the adjacent parcels of land. .(month/year) Present uscofproperty: / residential Zoning District: other (specify). APPUCANT . , Name*'‘~1V\<VfcVl Phone (home) Phone (wx)tk) d>/2~ Address: CiTy:\l3oi^ _____Zip:,fi5i32dL_ OWNER (if differqpt than applicant) Phone (horned S 41“i2.1^WNEK (It dmerMi man applicant; rnone inomei nTi~ -riak Name“^^4CtAllflgA) ^ Phone (wc^)_^_______ Address: L? I To Citv.VoM Zip: ^ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in deUdI: Qjdboua Ka^ ;s^n'4- (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ___Lot Width Setback:Front Hardcover Lot Coverage Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual propettv conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: Saft- flblpUx,gJvfl^ _______ A (attach additional sheets if necessary) ii •* * j' i L i^UaWi inrr ifiti DESCRIPTION OF RB3UEST: Request to construct a new "Lindal Cedar" home at 3625 North Shore Drive for residential use. The "28 x 42" .? bedroonV2 bath home would have a 50 foot set back from the lake shore and a 5-7 inch graduating west side line to allow the face of the home to follow the lake shore property line. Allowances on hardcover arfo lot coverage will be necessary. (see attached Aspen sketch for general design layout) LirKJal Cedar homes provide an efficient layout within a modest amount of space in a quaint Lakeside Cottage style. HARDSHIP/DESCRtPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDmONS: The four main problem areas are. the access road, lot size, well position and limited parking. The accete road has a steep embankment ^ich runs parallel with county road 51 and provides access to this lot and five other neighboring properties. The access road is narrow and congested due to resident and guest parking. The lot size is extremely narrow and the current home does not fall within the new city allowances. The new design is designed to accommodate the lot size and is position behind the two existing neighbor's homes. The well position • is currently out side of the city variances. Limited space for safe parking • due to the narrowness of the lot and access road there is limited parking available for the residents and or guests. 77"' 1! I i,2^ J .>•... i ? I •#•V H .j //V- 2 3-<SV) 4fgy-' *1 i ^ # . 1 ! j 1 '|.t » « HOUSE r / CONTOUR Lie [ETONKA AL BAY datum ve described the proposed visible other line is shown Shore Drive, exist. r direct afer> iurveyor under ly, SCALE r-20* OA1C 1-10-02 /-Zi'OZ. JOU NO. 02-004 u*»- .J IN LOT 9, AUD. bUB. INU. z/o HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA BtTUNWOUS^ bi ^WRTH SHOR e 'dRIVE L*49.80;^ s---------- II HOUSE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES ; Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision No. 263 0 : denotes iron marker LAKE 929.4 CONTOUR UNE MINNETONKA CRYSTAL BAY (908.3): denotes existing spot elevation, meon seo level dotun Bearings shown are based upon on assimed datisn. J?ope?tr®5Jhe"lrcation lf"^n*e^st inf hoSse°and'’sherth^^ .'.ra?iis;e?-'- ?h?f^Cn^1 t^°d^irnSfpi?;o:r?:iKof o^y ol^er improvements or encroachments. N9TE:.!0[.PV[P°!!i iflravel ^n^'^N^^^h'shoff Dri^ / UJ€Le^/-Z3 'OZ. HARnroVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 75-250' 250-500* ^ 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE " Q A. House tenglh6 X X X B. Otrage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck .•••• • • • X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plutic Or Fabric X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ________ ■*• B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE' A. House _______ Length X X X B. Oarege C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X 0. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A• a _ . ♦ B, Widdi X 100 Width .. D "...y J xlOO - S.F.- 24 S.F.’ S.F. S.F. HeysC S.F. €€0_ SQ~t^7 SO /7. €o 333. S.F. S.F. ’o»ve S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % A B S.F.-PRo P^iTO ♦4P05F S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. aMi/eu ST -0«IV£ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ^ir __S.F. -A __S.F. B37SO At AUK UJ€tCN HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* Qs|2^ 250-500’ EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A House _____________ X _____________ ■ 500-1000' 5^0 S F. Length X X X B. Oarage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck F. landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X 0. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ___ B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A House ____ X Length X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Paiio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _____________ B - • *7. •- 'jv -J 1 Tj 0 IJ fc,.a Width SF. SF. S.F. S.F. I4-7S ’c c_ S F.'j)p,v£. (if53 J. A. / r. SF. S.F. SF. S.F. S.F. S.F. ZO ?o9S X 100 7Z.7 7 S.F. A S.F. B % STL__ Width S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 14-AQ S F ^ (ns3 j. r. S.F. v3 fA/4 A ffi J S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SJ. S.F. SF. 2037 xlOO -7kl S.F. A S.F. B % V 'V ilITTI n~ 1 VsfiadHjW I I I I toN I »*rii6'r i .1 I ,<50 I I Dmi I T u • s t • t^x A i 1 I I i I I I i ■fcTT—:.i Cf^ HKPS# «».! PI V .• i ■ \/ 1 •5 ‘ \• t I ti*rBii*ir i‘ iftcwiy 6'APJ iG.^ First FlMf /I'O i.' .*■/ \r . r N * i J**. W-L^>>5 T ------------------- % 40 ska JJ. (T^) ' .V fi vj 1] (cr> .j Bonestroo g a Rpsene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects ■ofi#ftfOO. toitng. AiMfiili and Ailoclatci. toic to an Affiriiiailva Acilon/fdual Opd^'tuniiy liapioyar and ta^layaa Ownad Febniaiy 6.2002 Principals: Otio G Sonattroo. Pt • Marvin L SorvalA PJL • Glann f. Coofe. Pt • Rooart G. Schunicm. PC. • Jarry A. lourdon. PC. Samar Cansultantt: todart W. Posana. PC. • JoiapA C Andarht. PC. • Richard E. limar. PC • Susan M. COartin. C PA. Aflaclata PrliKipati; Ktich A Gordon. Pi. • RoOcrt R. Ptoftorla. Pi. • Richard W. Poittr. Pi. • Oavid O loiiwca. PC. • Mark A Hanson. Pi.. iMchad T. Rautmarm. PC • 1M R. PtoW. PC. • Kannach P Andarsoa PC • Mark R. Rolfs. PC • David A. Bonestroo. MBA • Sidney p \puJiamson. PU LI • Agnes Ml Ring. MCA • Allan Rick Schmidt PC • Thomas W. Peter son. PC • lamas R. Maland. PC • Milas B. Jansan. PC • L Phm^ Craval W. PC • Oamal 1 idgerton. Pi • Ismael Martmat. Pi • Thomas A Syfko. PC • Sheldon I Johnson • Oafa A Grove. PC • Thomas A Rousiw. PC • Rodart J Oevary. PC Offices: St Paul. $t Cloud. Rochester and Willmar. MN • Milwaukee. Wi • Chicago. It Utodilte: wwwdonesiroo com Paul Weinberger Zoning Administrator/Planner City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN SS323 wii I w.- 3623 North Shore Drive File No. 139-02-000 Plat No. 02-2751 Dear Paul: We have reviewed the survey for the proposed home construction at 3625 North Shore Drive. We have the following comments with regards to engineering matters: • Drainage and utility easements should be provided 10-fcet wide along the north lot line and 5-feet wide along the east and west lot lines. • A grading plan showing proposed contours should be provided. If you have any questions please call me at (651) 604-4863. Yours very truly, BONESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Tom Kellogg ^ Cc: Greg Gappa, City of Orono 233S West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul. Mt4 55113 • 651-636-4600 • Fax: 651-636-1311 mm DATE ii/is/i2 iATCN 5t2 PtOP ADM OMNCt NAME TAXfAVED NANE/AODE PiOP ADDA OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP AODR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADOR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY XNPORNATXON SYSTEN PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PXAUAil PARE 3 3D Di-117-23 34 •••! •DD3D ADDRESS UNASSICNED HENNEPXN COUNTY HENNEPXN COUNTY RXONT Of WAY 417 5TH ST N iS2D NINNEAPOLXS NN 554DX SA iD-117-23 34 iDD2 0603D ADDRESS UNASSXCNED HENNEPXN COUNTY HENNEPIN COUNTY RIGHT Of WAY 417 5TH ST N 1320 NINNEAPOLXS NN 554D1 3D DD-117-23 34 DDD3 DDI3D ADDRESS UNASSICNED HENNEPIN COUNTY HENNEPXN COUNTY RXGNT OF WAY 417 5TH ST N DS2D NINNEAPOLXS NN 554D1 3D ID-117-23 34 0ED4 DDD3D ADDRESS UNASSICNED HENNEPXN COUNTY HENNEPXN COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY 417 5TH ST N S32D NINNEAPOLXS NN 55401 3D OD-117-23 34 0005 0003D ADDRESS UNASSICNED HENNEPXN COUNTY HENNEPIN COUNTY RICHT OF WAY 417 5TH ST N D320 NINNEAPOLXS NN 55401 3D OD-117-23 34 0006 0003D ADDRESS UNASSXCNED COUNTY OF HENNEPXN HENNEPXN COUNTY RXCNT OF WAV 417 5TH ST N D320 NINNEAPOLXS NN 55401 3D OD-117-23 34 0007 D3645 NORTH SHORE DR D T COLOAN D C J COLGAN DANIEL T COLGAN 3645 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA NN 55341 3D OD-117-23 34 DODD D3635 NORTH SNORE DR Z D N LXBERNAN ZVX t NXRXAN LXBERNAN 222D TERRITORIAL RD ST PAUL NN 55114 3B OD-117-23 34 0009 03625 NORTH SHORE OR R A i C K EBERLE NARK E WELCH 3625 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA NN 55391 • i Si OD-117-23 34 0010 03619 NORTH SHORE DR 0 E BARON S S N BARON CARY E D SANDRA N BARON 4745 YORKTOWN LA N PLYNOUTH NN 55442 SO 00-117-23 34 0011 03605 NORTH SHORE OR LAURENCE A JONES t WIFE LAURENCE t AROELL JONES 3605 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA NN 55391 74 00-117-23 34 0050 03655 NORTH SNORE OR ADD HAGEN AL I DONNA HAGEN 3655 ;iORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA NN 55391 SO 00-117-23 34 0056 03507 NORTH SNORE DR S R 0 J S SUNDRY STEVEN R 0 JANNA S SUNDRY 3507 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA NN 55391 TOTAL BATCH 502 00013 oT 1 i' 11 -t ri^-- - _______ Application Date: Completion Date: 60 Day Deadline: 1/23/02 1/23/02 3/20/02 FEB 2 5 2002 CITY Of ORONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: Name Wendy Bonenberg Title Zoning Adminstralor/Planner DATE: 2/20/02 ITEM NO.: / ^ Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #02-2754 Matthew & Kathy Dolliff 2680 Pheasant Road - Variance Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) 34.625 s.f. (.79 acres) List of Exhibits: A Resolution B Staff Report and Exhibits of 2/19/2002 Application Summary: The applicants are proposing to construct a 467 s.f. addition and 164 s.f entryway and walk to the residence. The addition and walk will be on the street side of the residence. The existing residence is in the shape of an “H". The addition will be in the middle of the residence creating a “U" shape. The addition will consist of a entry way. dining room and muJ room. The addition and walk are to be located in the 75-250’ setback zone. A portion of the addition is over existing hardcover. The other portion will increase the amount of hardcover in the setback zone, however the applicant is proposing to remove existing hardcover in the 75-250’ zone to oflset the increase. The hardcover proposed to be removed is the brick patio and wall, the dog run and a portion of the lake side patio. Therefore, the hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone is not increasing with the proposed addition and walk. The addition will increase the lot coverage by structures on the property to 3.476 s.f (10.03%) but still below the allowed 15%. Pertinent Code Section: 1. Section 10.22. Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(L)(2): Hardcover in 75-250': Within 75- 250' of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. To permit 6,355 s.f (34.19%) hardcover where 4,646.75 s.f. (25%) is allowed. PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 6 to 0 vote to: Approve the application as presented. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the enclosed resolution. 1 t • COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) (2) FILE NO. 02-2754 WHEREAS. Matthew A. DollitT and Kathleen M Dollifi; (hereinafter "the applicants") arc owners of the property located at 2680 Pheasant Road within the City ot Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lot 20. Pheasant Lawn. Hennepin County. Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22. Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56. Subdivision 16(L)(?)topermit6.355s.f.(34.19% hardcover in the 75-250’ lakeshore setback where 6.355 s.f. (34.1 9%) hardcover exists and 4.646.75 s.f. (25%) is allowed to permit an addition and walk to the existing residence; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 19. 2002, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #02-2754. 2. The property is located in the LR-IB, Single Family Lakeshoic Residential Zoning District, where 43.560 s.f. or 1 acre is the minimum required lot area. The property consists of approximately 34,625 s.f. or .79 acres. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 19,2002 and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: Page 1 of 5 A. The lot coverage by structures is increasing but still below the allowed 15%. 0. The residence was constructed in 1951, prior to current zoning standards. C.Hardcover in the 75*250 ’ setback zone is decreasing on the lake side of the property and being added to the street side. D.Hardcover in the 75-250 ’ setback zone is not changing with the addition and w alk. The brick patio and wall, dog run and a portion of the lakeside patio ai'e being removed to offset the increase. fhe City Council finds that the conditions c.xisting on this propciiy are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air. nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property: would not merely serve as a co. . enience to the applicants, but is neccssaiy to allevi.ite a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping w ith the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City StalT. comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, salcty and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22. Subdivision 2 and Section 10.55. Subc'ivision 16 (I.) (2) to permit 6,355 s.f. (34.19%) hardcover in the 75-250 ’ lakeshc.w setback where 6,355 s.f. (34.19%) hardcover exists and 4,646.75 s.f. (25%) is allowed to permit an addition and walk to the existing residence, subject to the following conditions: 1.Council approval is abased on the site plan submitted by the applicants attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan may require further Page 2 of 5 J 1 Planning Commission and City Council review. Authorities granted by the variances run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit w ithin one year of the date of Council approval, or these variances will expire on that date (Februaiy 25.2003). 3.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of the variances shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and ‘hal! be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4. The undersigned owners have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono. Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of February. 2002. ATfEST: Linda S. Vee. City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owners STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day of February, 2002 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of S STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN dav ofThe foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _______ , 200____by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrumei t was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this dav of 20. personally appeared before me, ____ who is personally known to me ____ whose identity I proved on the basis of, whose identity 1 proved on the oath/afTimiation witness ,a credible and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/'her/their free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of ,20 personally appeared before me, ____ who is personally known to me ____ whose identity I proved on the basis of. whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation witness ., a credible and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/shc/they executed the same as his/her/their free .act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 i / / owvtiVAy • ^ dll i rJ**.1 '?er.'*»sa>y5^U / / / / / / %20t SO- rr. '/ / DOG RUN - 110 SO / jr. Aidi^d.V<i INCW AOOIDON^ 467 SO FT J- '■ 0^0 K:.>9 ii» / ■KUOVEO PA1I0 - 197 SQ FT f)0i'^ 4%#/ U ^ ‘RcfYOVii^: ^ ^ p i 'O ’h PhcMsant Road. Omno Variance Application iSiteplan / TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Wendy Bottenberg, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:February 4,2002 SUBJECT:1102-2754 Matthew/Kathy DollifT 2680 Pheasant Road Variance — Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (I acre) 34,625 s.f. (.79 acres) Lbt of Exhibits A Analysis Worksheet Application Survey/Site Plan Description of Proposal/Hardships Floor Plans/ elevations Photo of Property Plat Map Property Owner’s List Hardcover Worksheets B C D E F G H I Application Summary: The applicants are proposing to construct a 467 s.f. addition and 164 s.f. entryway and walk to the residence. The addition and walk will be on the street side of the residence. The e.xisting residence is in the shape of an “H”. The addition will be in the middle of the residence creating a “U” shape. The addition will consist of a entr>' way, dining room and mud room. The addition and walk are to be located in the 75-250' setback zone. A portion of the addition is over e.\isting hardcover. The other portion will increase the amount of hardcover in the setback zone, however the applicant is proposing to remove existing hardcover in the 75-250’ zone to offset the increase. The hardcover proposed to be removed is the brick patio and wall, the dog run and a portion of the lake side patio. Therefore, the hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone is not increasing with the proposed addition and walk. The addition will increase the lot coverage by structures on the property to 3,476 s.f. (10.03%) but still below the allowed 15%. Pertinent Code Section: 1. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (LX2); Hardcover in 75-250': Within 75- 250' of the shoreline theie shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. To permit 6,355 s.f. (34.19%) hardcover where 4,646.75 s.f. (25%) is allowed. #02-2754 Matthew/Kathy Dolliff 25S0 Pheasant Road Variance 2'4/2002 Page I of2 • at--.,^ Statement of Hardship: The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit D. The applicant should also be ask^ for their testimony regarding this issue. Issues for Consideration: 1.The addition and walk increase the amount of hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone, however the applicant is proposing to remove hardcover in this setback zone to offset the increase. 2.Lot coverage by structures is increasing to 3,476 s.f. (10.03%), still well below the allowed 15%. 3.The residence was constructed in 1951. The only addition to the residence since has been a screen porch. 4. 5. 6. The residence was constructed prior to current zoning standards. Hardcover is decreasing on the lakeside of the residence and being added to the sueet side. Other issues by Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the hardcover variance in the 75-250' setback zone to permit the additions to the residence. ft02-2754 Matthew/Kadiy DoIIiff 2680 Pheasant Road Variance I'4.2002 Page 2 of2 1 I ANALYSIS WORKSHEET LR-IB Lot Area Required 1 Acre Actual .79 Acres Hardcover Calculations Distance from Total area in Allowed Existing Proposed shoreline setback hardcover Hardcover Hardcover 0-75’7170 s.f.0s.f 0 s.f 0 s.f (0%)(0%)(0%) 75-250’18587 s.f.4646.75 s.f 6355 s.f 6355 s.f (25%)(34.19%)(34.19%) 250-500'8868 s.f 2660.4 s.f 905 s.f 905 s.f (30%)(10.21%)(10.21%) Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 34625 s.f Allowed: 5193.75 s.f 15.00% Existing: 2967.00 s.f 8.57% Proposed:3476.00 s.f 10.03% ... Jan-J2*20Q2 02:l9pi FroaKiTY OF ORONO f9S22494Blt T-S30 POOr/OIS F-959 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION iim Aroucaaon f-ee 12^0.00 1 ($50.00 per each •ddinonal variance) Renewal Variance Fee SIS0.00 (no change from ori^nal af^licadon) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-ihe-Fact Fees (Double application fee) ApplkiloB# Date Received / -<? a- AueuntPaid ^rX7.0c> PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address Who , ogoeiO # • Proper^ Identification Number (P.I.D.)_X\* Ul*‘i3"7.S ~007jQ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired 0VN6 1^^^___________________ I (do) j(do not^also own the adjacent parcels of land. :eni use oT n ,(fflonth/year) Present um ot propeity: X residential ___other (specify) Zoning District: KCSIOP k ICIAi^ lACE$H0(l£______ APPLICANT(3^D OWIJ02S) Name NyftTTKEW boLl\PP Phone (home)fts2)4ni-gbng Addres^Z6^0 Eefto ■OWPiER (if difiemnt than applieant) City: O/2cN0,Ky>r4 Phone (work) ^^1^5 in; itaUMw Name g tp L€s)\r4 Cl^ COON/ffY phone (work)C3^SEEE Address: 334 _________City: €XCgt(lt)d- 2iD:^S331 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Ejticiated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: ___________" (attach additional sheets if necessazy) VARIANCES REQUIRED ___Lot Area ___Lot Width ^ Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakeshote Other (specify) 'HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAJ. PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual propeity conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: Mflgrs -------------------------------------------- (attach additional rileets if necessary) Tr M ciJj B 1 c. H A • —-c^7 •, - ./ « •• fltf“* r *■• -r* ••jr V'^ w. lAJL 1 KAJ 1 I • ^ ' T^XK pa hO '< ^ Item E: Propoa^ Siteplan b CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION ADDENDUM TO APPLICATION FOR: Matthew A. & Kathleen M. DoIIifT Residence 2680 Pheasant Road, Orono, MN SS331 AppUcatloo # lAddeadninl DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST History die Current Situation ■ The applicant and his family have lived in the house on this property since June of 1998, having purchased the house from his parents who are the original builders of the house back in 19SI. It is a relatively decent sized parcel (nearly 33,000 SF), but relatively long and thin. The bouse is set back 134.3 feet from the high water mark and llOfeetfromihestreetsideproperty line, putting nearly all of the impervious surfaces on the prope^ within the 73' to 230’ setback zone. There are many impervious elements in this typical lakeshore home, and their sum total results in a hardcover percentage of 34.2% due to the narrowness of the lot (average lot width through the zone is only 106.2 ft). So even though the lot is 34,623 SF, the relatively modest house, driveway and turnaround, patios and decks, and retaining walls result in an impervious coverage ratio that is 9.2% above the 23% ordinance. The current house is oddly designed, which creates two major negatives impacts on the house [refer to Item A attached]. 1. The “H-shape" design is quite narrow in the middle, making the center living space a "bridge” between ends of the house. This makes the spaces somewhat dysfunctional, as they have a difficult time relating and socializing with each other from ends of the house. 2. The "H-shape" design creates a trough for surface water to gather, giving them an aimual water problem in the basement. The water travels downward towards the house from the street and gets caught between the garage extension on the north end and the bedroom extension on the southern end. Proposed Project The applicant has developed a design with the assistance of Lake Country Builders that will place an addition on the street side of the house between the two side extensions of the house, turning the "H-shape” into a “U-shape" [refer to Items B & C anached]. This will help solve the two major problems in the house (previously noted above). The 467 SF addition fills in the "trough” between ends of the house, allowing simple positive drainage to guide the surface waters around the sides and towards the backyard. With the added square footage, a new mudroom, entry and dining room can become a part of the narrow center section of the house. This will result in a much more social and functional house, [refer to Item B anached] With the wet basement issues solved, the oumers can improve the finishes in their lower level and make use of the family space there. In the area where the addition is proposed, an existing brick wall and brick patio exist To compensate for the additional hardcover, the applicant has proposed to remove the brick patio and wall, and 312 SF from the two lakeside impervious surfaces (a 113 SF dog run and 197 SF from the lower lake side patio) to maintain the current hardcover ratio where it is, at 34.2?a Please refer to the attacked hardcover spreadsheet as well as Item E attached. H.\RDSHlP/DESCRlPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Unique to the land in question The current house and property conditions already qualify as non-conforming [refer to hardcover table and Item D attached]. The hardcover ordinance is already exceeded in the 73’ to 230’ setback zone. This is due to, in large part as mentioned above, to the narrowness (106 foot width) of the lot. The lot tuns 386.6 feet along its northern border which is significantly unusual it relation to its width. With only 18,387 square feet in this zone, the 23% hardcover ordinance allows for only 4646 square feet for bouse, driveway and outdoor living spaces. Currently, the house and garage footprint account for 2391 SF and the modest driveway with turnaround is 2201 SF - these two items alone (4792 SF) put the zone in a 26% ratio, not including any of the existing sidewalks, retaining walls, decks and patios. It doesn’t seem reasonable that a '// • ZA • -• t • • ’•.i A'4wjArt nuily 3i!,000 SF property be Uinited to a bouse and garage footprint of2391 SF. Therefore, we can conclude that the lot is unusually narrow for its length. Unique to the cibting structure location The existing structure sits well back from the lake (134J ft at its nearest point), but because of the lot depth, dw garage sits 145 feet from the street side property line, accounting for a very long driveway. The garage sits along the northern border of the property and requires a turn-around to back vehicles out before traversing the 143-foot driveway. Because of its location a^ need for a turnaround, the vehicular aspect of the property is somewhat unique. 2201 SF of impervious driveway, all necessary to allow cars to safely enter the garage, turn around, and exit the property. It is conceivable that the driveway be reduced in size to allow vehicles to enter the gai^e, but to elimiiute enough square footage to bring the property into compliance would require the elimination of the turnaround. It is certainly possible to argue that the unique nature of the garage location, along with its distance back from the street requires a degree of impervious surface that makes it a hardship. The applicant does not wish to remove the turnaround area of the driveway for Mfety reasons. Pheasant Road is a neighborly area of many young families, and to require the owners and visitors to the house to back up into the street is putting impervious surface issues ahead of the public welfare. Further Arguments The intent of the hardcover ordinance is to prevent overcrowding on Orono properties, which can lead to negative impacts on water and drainage issues in die lakeshore impact zones. Many Lake Minnetonka communities embrace a similar 23% impervious surface ratio for the same reasons. Orono is unique in its breakdown of the impervious coverage ordinances into separate zones. Although the 73’-250 ’ setback zone is at 34.2% hardcover (9.2% over the ordinance), no hardcover exists in the 0’-73’ zone and the hardcover in the 250 ’+ zone is at 10.2%, putting the entire property in a impervious to property ratio of 20.9%. It is the narrowness of the property and the concentration of the hardcover in one zone that makes this property non-conforming and problematic. The proposed plan assists drainage and accommodates a design that increases the functionality of the house. The plan eliminates 312 SF of impervious surface in areas closer to the lake than where it is being added, and the proposed property will, at project completion, have an impervious surface ratio equal to the current level (i.e. we are not adding to the hardcover total). This is sim/^y a request to aliow the current conditions to he maintained in order to refurbish, remodet and improve the existing house. The proposed project has no negative implications to this specific lot, its immediate neighbors, or to the neighborhood in general. The public welfare is not in harm’s way, and the panting of a variance for this project provides no special provisions to this lot that other residents of Orono are not entitled, as it is an alre^y non-conforming property and a clear hardship is present, as noted above. APPLICANTS’ LEGAL NAMES Matthew A. & Kathleen M. DollifT(husband and wife) it •• t .> r 0 • h' •;•.. Lf LI U I i U 1 III fill •ll••M«■iOl•>ul■>4•r |•lll■ nil Mrihili)iil|l t iiiiii'iHf Mli niKnll ll•llll■lll|■>llll•ll|■ tif iiri^iiiiiii lli■•ll^■ ti (')iif Ilia Mil kil ii|f4 • iiil iiil till Mll .lll III Mil Mil I'll nil III V MU mifl III fJ'fP »'|l<lllllllll III! Ml 111 IIIII III II :■ ■■ ' ■■ ■ t iTl MiPi/Ilf >1 i fiSiS If‘till HIP iilP'iiiiiiiii III! iiltinii.i |M ■■ . ■■■, p,,111.1111 HillAHiilKii'ni a V' . ■“'•I I » r % i 2680 PhgaMtif Road. Omno Variangg AppIliHitlftti Trem C-. P A Front Rl H- -- k i u'V'*-* rJ : !)t - ' •. NJ ^ '‘S- K-^ .cA 2680 Pheasant Rnud. Orono Varianea AppH«^||mi Item Ai RKiating Flootplan \ * »i ‘ di'i^j' ■|}''' ^ M |3-J c •V .; /■:v • ■•' •I ’ • . •• ¥ 1 W W ^.............!)r • 1-i '1 1 1 1 T O ♦ u 4^J[ jJ/\ D n . 7 ■ |l r 1 4 'i 2680 Pheasant Orono Varittficc AppUcation Item B: Pi \ Flonq>liin r\ p rzy-i t"»f /C'/ C/M3Ky Wj0T '■JV'•'•il. * • '^' 't.- !, r • -r->' > «• -^JL ^ *^-' • '::—^ : % ., --.t^v * ^ •Vj> •V. ‘ ^:^.. *'• '*i .*» ;*. :•'. •. *♦ • ,.* >%• *'%i. ' *ui* * •» il., . %r :.* • '» J IMiin bounty Seryici^ Depwtin^ *A •• • * *»?.'.*Tny c" \kPameilnhmM • Parcel ID 21117232^20 House Number 2680 Street Name PHEASANT RD Thsisnatahg^nooidBdimp. ItnpnaantsaoonfMonafinfomwilon mOitK Ooutfy, mdSul»maclmMhoriBmani<Mtmaoun^and (kta from f .« -<>rt r t. .■ rnsAi lUN MTE •l/22/i2 UTCM StS NEMKPIN COUNTY fROPfRTV'INFOnMTXON SVSTfN PROKRTY OW«RS LIST t • REPORT NO. PX4SMR1 PACE 11 7 OMNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR PROP MNNt OWNER NAW TAXPAYER NAHE/AMR SR 21-1X7>2S 25 RRIR •2A7S PHEASANT RO S H SHERP S J R SWRF S N SNERP S J R SHERP EATS PHEASANT RO EXCELSIOR HN SBSSl SR 21*117-25 25 Olll 02405 PHEASANT HU O H HERERT A J A HERERT 0 H HERERT S J A HERERT SMS PHEASAHT RO EXCELSIOR HN 5SSS1 SR 21-117*25 25 0012 02M5 PHEASANT RO RARRARA J REMICK RARRARA J REOOICK 249S PHEASANT RO EXCELSIOR HN SS551 SO 21-117-25 25 0015 0270S PHEASANT RO OAK JOHNSTON 0 P A X A JOHNSTON 270S PHEASANT RO S EXCELSIOR HN SS5S1 5S 21-117-25 25 0014 00050 ADDRESS UNASSICNEO PHEASANT LAWN HOHEOHNERS PHEASANT LAMN HOHEOHNERS 2?:0 PLEASANT RO EXCELSIOR HN SS5S1 50 21-117-25 25 0017 02700 PHEASANT RO NICHAEL J CUUEN ET AL HICHAEI J CULLEN 2700 PHEASANT RO EXCELSIOR HN SS551 PROP AODR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SO 21-117-25 25 0019 02490 PHEASANT RO H J A 0 R PUOIL NICHAEL J A SAIL R PUOIL 2490 PHEASANT RO EXCELSIOR HN 5S551 50 21-117-25 25 0020 02M0 PHEASANT RO N A A X H DOLLIFF NATTHEH A XATNLEEN DOLLIFF 2M0 PHEASANT RO EXCELSIOR HN SSSSl 50 21-117-25 25 0021 02470 PHEASANT RO RAYHOND E JOHNSON RAY E JOHNSON 444 FERNOALE RO N HAYZATA HN SS591 f. ) ' PROP AODR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 5A 21-117-25 25 0022 02440 PHEASANT RO 0 H NAYHURST SSL HAYHURST OREOORY H A OAYLE L HAYHURST 2440 PHEASANT RO EXCELSIOR HN SSSSl SO 21-117-25 25 OOSO 0240S SHAOVHOOD RO R H OROHN A H H RROHN RICHARD W A NARION H OROHN 240B SNADVHOOO RO S EXCELSIOR HN SSSSl 50 21-117-25 25 00S4 02475 PHEASANT RO G C JONES A J L JONES GEORGE C JONES/JACXI L JONES 2475 PHEASANT RO EXCELSIOR HN SSSSl PROP AOOR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 50 21-117-25 24 0055 0247S SHAOYHOOO RO OARY E HEOENES GARY HEOENES 247S SNADVHOOO RO EXCELSIOR HN SSTj>l TOTAL BATCH SOS 00015 . JJ‘ .,/ ;r.-; .V»’ ''^m:RAN6E of area IMPERVIOUS ITEM “ 40USE RONT BRICK PATK>_~ «EW SIDEWALK AN d IbTOOP PROMT BRICK WALL STONE RETAINING WALL AT NW STEPS DRIVEWAY CONC PATIO REAR BRK;K PATIO ■rear oec ^ off porch REAR DECKS (SKINNY ONES) REAR STONE RET. WALL TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 1 OHWM to 75* raiiKie EXnriNO PROPOSED 0 0 0 AREA IN LOT SECTION UTK> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7170 7170 no changes 0.00%0.00% 7S‘.to 250'range EXtS^NG PROPOSED 2591 249 70 35 50 2201 115 649 145 231 19 3058 0 164 0 35 50 2201 115 337 145 231 19 6355 6355 18587 18587 changes in boldface 34.19%34.19% 250' and beyond range EXISTING PROPOSED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 905 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 905 0 0 0 0 0 905 90S 8868 8868 no changes 10.21%10.21% ovERi^^rapriERrn^ EXISTMO PROPOdEO 2591 249 70 35 50 3106 115 649 145 231 19 7260 34625 20.97% 3058 0 164 0 35 SO 3106 115 337 145 231 19 7260 34625 20.97% •i i) & C-- U *7•• 1-: I w y < V • <• ^ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: February 22,2002 Item No.; Department Approval:Administrator Approval: Name: Michael P. GalTron Title: Planning Director Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #02-2755 Long Lake Fire Station, 340 Willow Drive North - - Preliminary Plat - Setback Variance - Hose Tower Height CUP List of Exhibits A - Memo & Exhibits of 2/15/02 Summary of Request 1.City of Orono proposes a 2-lot plat to create a fire station lot, a rear lot for future possible residential use, and a road outlot for shared access to the fire station and residential lot. PC Recommendation: Approval (6-0) 2.A combination of limiting site factors has resulted in the need for a 10* setback variance to locate the fire station building 40' from the proposed road outlot rather than the 50' required. PC Recommendation: Approval (6-0) 3.The fire station building plans incorporate a hose tower (used primarily for training purposes) as a bid alternate. This flat-roofed vertical extension of a 20'.\22' portion of the station is proposed at a defined height of 34’8", or approximately 5' higher than the 30' allowed by code. A Conditional Use Permit per Code Section 10.75, Subd. 1 is requested. PC Recommendation: Denial (6-0) Planning Commission Recommendation Please review the memo and exhibits of February' 15. Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed this 3-part application on February 19,2002. Gabriel Jabbour was present on behalf of the City and the Fire Station Committee to answer questions. Two members of the public were present, Ron Miller of270 North Willow Drive and Jim Dillman of225 North Willow Drive. Miller made a brief presentation expressing concerns about the height of the hose tower and its use, about the location of the building and the proposed road access, which he would prefer to be at the north end of the building, and about the design of the building itself. Dillman had a question regarding I i #02-2755 Fire Station Plat/Var/CUP February 22,2002 Page 2 exterior lighting and street lighting. He was advised that all site lighting would have to comply with City codes and be shielded and directed downward, and that Orono has no plans to add decorative street lighting on Willow in this area because it is a rural neighborhood. Planning Commission discussed the issues and recommended as follows: I.Approval (6-0) of preliminary plat as presented, subject to MCWD approval of the wetland mitigation and stormwater management plan. 2.Approval (6-0) of the setback variance for the fire station, finding that the variance is supported by the hardships as stated in the staff memo and that the variance will have no impact on the neighborhood or adjacent properties; with the condition that if the 6th bay is not built, the station must meet the required 50 ’ setback. 3. Denial (6-0) of the CUP for tower height based on the following findings: a; It will have a potential negative visual impact on the neighborhood due partially to its non-icsidential character b) I's use for training purposes has a potential to become a nuisance in this residential neighborhood, especially if it becomes a training center for other departments. c) The need for the excess tower height has not been demonstrated, and there may be other options, such as building it 5 ’ further into the ground. d) The potential impacts of the tower in this residential neighborhood cannot be satisfactorily mitigated. It should also be noted that the City has consistently denied building height variances for homes and institutional buildings in single family zones. Two most recent examples arc the Minnetonka Art Center and the Burton residence on Rainey Road. Other Issues of Note or for Discussion 1.Will park fees be due for this plat? Technically, the fire station is neither a residential use nor a commercial/industrial use, and has little if any impact on park needs. It would not be unreasonable to waive park fees or exempt Lo* 1 from them, given the fire station use and City ownership. However, the future development of Lot 2 may be residential and have a parks impact. Park Commission has not reviewed this plat. Staff recommends that park fees be deferred for Lot 2 until it is residentially developed (see item 4 below). Will Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fees be due for this plat? Again, the fire station is not strictly a residential, commercial or industrial use, so applicability of the Trunk Fee is questionable, but the fire station is hardsurfacing about 60% of Lot 1. The S&D Trunk fee for Lot 1 if treated as commercial property would be $6,480 per acre or £q>proximateIy S13,200. Lot 2 could be come a residential site, and the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee #02-2755 Fire Station PlatA'ar/CUP February 22,2002 Page 3 3. 4. 5. 6. for residential uses is based on the zoning density; this is currently a 2-acre zone but could change to 2-3 ur its per acre SFR or even 4+ units per acre MFR depending on its ultimate use, which is ar yet undecided. Council must consider whether the Trunk Fee is applicable to Lotsl or 2, and if so, whether the Fee should be required, waived or deferred. Documenting allowable fire station uses. Planning Commission recommended that Council should discuss and clearly document (via ordinance, restrictive covenants or other method) the City’s intent for allowed uses of the fire station site, given that this is in a residential neighborhood. The uses should be limited to fire department related uses; i.e. it is not in a location for it to become a ‘community center*, and not suited for high intensity, high trafTic uses. Lighting and signage should be low key. Lot 2 Status - ‘Lot* or ‘Outlot’? Planning Commission briefly discussed whether Lot 2 should be platted as an Outlot rather than as a buildable site. Outlot status would require a future re-platting to make Lot 2 buildable. This can be a valuable tool when the future use of a site is in doubt and the owner wants to delay certain development decisions or payment of fees. While the City will own Lot 2 and have total control of it, the City is undecided as to how it might ultimately be used. If the City sells it to a developer for a specific use, it may be less difficult to collect impact fees (park fees, stormwater fees, road costs, sewer & water costs, etc.) via a re-platting process as compared to a mere sale. Therefore, staff is suggesting that Council should strongly consider platting Lot 2 as an Outlot. Road Corridor - Public Dedication or Outlot? The road corridor is shown on the preliminary plat as an Outlot rather than as a dedicated road. However, this means that it will have a separate ta.x ID similar to a private road. This also creates the need for easements if it is not jointly owned by an association of all parcels benefitting by it. This road is going to be public in nature since it will scr\c not only the fire station but any future residential development to the east, and could potentially even be a through road to Long Lake. It would be most appropriate to dedicate it as a public road on the plat (it will then need a name...). One option is to name it the same as the road it aligns w ith best in Long Lake, which likely is Orchard Lane. This would make sense if it is to become a through road someday. If it’s never going to be a through road, it should have a different name. The plat name is proposed as Willowfire Addition; the road could be Willowfire Drive... Application Fees/Costs. No application fees have been paid; the standard application fee for the variance would be S250, for the CUP would be S250, and for the subdivision would be S375 plus ancillary road review costs, engineering and legal actual costs, etc. Out-of- pocket costs for surveying-'platting w ill be approximately S4,000, and additional fees will be incurred for legal work and filing the documents. Staff recommends that as a minimum, all out-of-pocket and consultant costs be charged. I i i #02-2755 Fire Station PlatA^ar/CUP February 22,2002 Page 4 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that Council direct staff to draft a resolution for preliminary plat approval for review and adoption at the March 1 1 meeting, incorporating the following concepts: a) Plat approval will be subject to MCWD approval of stormwater management plan and wetland mitigation plan; acknowledgement that future development of Lot 2 will likely require expansion of the stormwater pond currently designed to serve just the fire station; Lot 2 to be platted as an outlot; Road to platted as dedicated right-of-way rather than as an outlot; Park fees be waived for Lot 1 and deferred for Lot 2; Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fees be required for Lot 1 and deferred for Lot 2; Subject to the necessary standard perimeter drainage and utility easements, the necessary sewer/water easement through Lot 2, as well as wetland and buffer easements as appropriate and/or as required by MCWD; Division line between Lots 1 and 2 to be located 10' east of curb of fire station rear parking lot (the architect’s latest plan apparently shifted everything east about a foot from the original preliminary plat drawing) Plat Name: Willowfire Addition Road Name:________________ b) c) d) e) 0 g) Staff recommends that Council direct staff to draft a resolution for approval of the setback variance for the fire station, incorporating the hardships and supportive background information contained in the staff memo of February 15, subject to the variance being nullified if the 6th bay is not built. StatT recommends that Council direct staff to draft a resolution denying the hose tower CUP based on the findings of the Planning Commission and incorporating any additional findings made by Council. Staff recommends that as a minimum, all out of pocket and consultant costs for the plat be charged. Council should determine whether any application fees should be charged. I II< In \ j f::' To: From: Dale: Subject: Chair Ha\\'n and Planning Commission Ron Moorse, City Administrator Mike GafTron, Planning Director February 15,2002 #2755 City of Orono, 340 Willow Drive North - Long Lake Fire Station 1) Conditional Use Permit for Hose Tower 2) 2-Lot Subdivision including Setback Variance Site Area: 6.17 acres including Willow Dnve Zjonlng District: RR-IB, Single Family Rural Residential, 2-acre minimum Comprehensive Pian: The area east of Willow Drive to the Long Lake border, south of the railroad right-of- way and north of Watertown Road, is guided for single-family residential use at a density of 2-3 units per acre. Thsi area was added to Orono’s MUSA with the recently adopted 2000-2020 Comp Plan. Summary of Request The new Long Lake Fire Station will be located on property in Orono at 340 Willow Drive North. This property was purchased by the City of Orono with the primary intent of providing a fire station site approximately 3 acres in area, per the agreement between Orono and Long Lake. The remaining easterly portion of the site is intended to be divided off, creating a building site to be owned by Orono and likely used for residential purposes. As a municipal building owned in part by Orono, the Fire Station is a permitted use in this residential zone, with no specific code requirement for a formal site plan review by Planning Commission. For purposes of applying appropriate development standards to the Fire Station development, it is being considered most similar to an institutional use such as a church or a school. The general performance standards which apply to similar development in residential zones will apply, such as the standard 30* height limitations, 50* building setback from all lot lines, 10' parking setback, etc. The site planning and building design process has resulted in a plan which meets Orono’s development standards with the exception of two items: 1) The existence of delineated wetlands along the south boundary has resulted in the road being placed slightly further north on the site than originally anticipated, and it will curve northward as it nears the rear of the fire station site. This results in the need for a setback variance for the station. The setback from the south side of the building to the proposed road right-of-way is 40’ instead of the required 50'. 2) The fire station building plans include the possibility (as a bid alternate) of a 20'x22' hose tower with flat roof extending to a height of 34*-8" above grade where the maximum allowed height is 30'. This tower could be allowed only via a conditional use permit per Zoning Code Section 10.75, Subd. 1. ~“"T; « . I L. #2755 Long Lake Fife Station Site February 15,2002 Page 2 List of Exhibits A - Preliminary Plat Drawing/Survey B - Site Plan C - Wetland Mitigation Plans D • Stormwater Ponding Plan E - Fire Station Elevation Views F - Comments by Adjacent Neighbor G - Applications H • Plat Map I - Property Owners List Factors Affecting Site Layout The site plan for the Fire Station has been developed by the joint Fire Station Committee and reviewed by both City Councils. Site layout has been significantly influenced by a number of factors including: 1) the necessary north-south building orientation to allow for direct fire apparatus e.xit onto Willow Drive without requiring additional turning movements; driveway aprons required on east and west sides of the building bays to allow for fire apparatus ingress/egress, necessitating that administrative and training spaces be located on the north or south ends of the building; road / driveway access to the rear of the building must allow for the necessary wide turning radius of fire apparatus; proximity to the existing/future Willow Drive bridge over the RR and the new Highway 12 route; S) site limitations imposed by width of the site, as well as by the location of existing linear wetlands on the site, and the need to create a road corridor to provide access to the rear of the property for future residential use; soil conditions which require extensive soil correction work and which limit use of the southerly portion of the site for building purposes. I. Proposed Subdivision The intent of the subdivision is to create a building lot for the fire station and a future residential parcel behind it which will likely ultimately be developed for single family, senior housing or other residential use not yet determined. Future use of the residential parcel is likely to be the subject of a rezoning to either RPUD or some new zoning district allowing SFR at 2-3 units per acre. Therefore, the 2-acre minimum area requirement for the RR-1B zone would not necessarily come into play (if this is an issue for Planning Conunission, the residential site could be platted as an outlot, requiring fiiture City tq>proval to use it as a building site). The front/back lot configuration requires that a road or driveway corridor be .k r. 1^-'I ii-X'iPiia #2755 Long Lake Fire Station Site February 15.2002 Page 3 platted. The proximity of the north boundary of the property to the future new bridge over the railroad and new Highway 12, makes it necessary for this corridor to be along the south boundary of the site. Orono normally requires a 50' public or private road corridor to serve the range and magnitude of potential uses expected on this site. At this time there is no plan to make a future through road connection to Long Lake, although Proposed Subdivision Lot Area/Widtb Lot 1 (Fire Station) Lot 2 (East Lot) Road Outlot Willow Drive R.O.W. Total Gross Area 2.04 ac. 3.42 ac. 0.42 ac. 0.29 ac. 6.17 ac. Eiisting Welland Area 0.14 ac. 0 J7 ac. 0.07 ac. 0.58 ac. Net Area Eicittsive of Welland* 1 .90 ac. 3.05 ac. 0 JS ac. 0.29 ac. 5.59 ac. Lot WMib (N-S) 327*+ 388 ’ + 60 + 33' * Prior to wetland (illing. mitigation and stormwater ponding the 50' corridor would accommodate such a roadway. Because Orono has not determined a final use for the proposed easterly parcel, the road corridor is not being platted past the fire station lot. The proposed road corridor exceeds 50 feet in width to avoid impacting the drainageway along the south boundary of the site. It also curves northward at the rear of Lot 1 to minimize the amount of wetland filling necessary. Wetland Impacts. Delineation of wetlands on the site has resulted in a number of site layout impacts, and wetlands themselves will be impacted to some extent. First, the wetlands on the site are not shown on either the National Wetland Inventory or the City of Orono ’s protected wetland maps. These newly defined wetlands are linear in nature, wooded wetlands, following the drainageway or intermittent creek bed as it traverses from w cst to east near the southern border of the site. A finger of delineated wetland extends northwestward from the creek bed tow ard the fire station, and portions of this will have to be filled in order to accommodate the station, its access driveway, and the road leading to Lot 2. The wetland filling cannot be totally avoided; however, it has been minimized by expanding the road corridor and routing the road/driveway northward over a narrow point of the wetland finger. Nearly all the wetland filling will occur in Lot 1. Mitigation of this filling is proposed to occur in Lot 2 on the south side of the creek at a 2:1 ratio as required by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. MCWD requires a 16' buffer be maintained around the existing wetlands and around the mitigation area. The mitigation boundary has been held back 16' from the south lot line so that use of the adjoining property is not affected by current MCWD buffer requirements. MCWD has a rule change process underway that would increase the wetland buffer requirements; however, those requirements are not in effect at the time of this review and are not expected to impact this application. The MCWD will require that easements be created for protection of the existing and newly created wetlands as well as for the required buffer areas. Remember that the wetlands delineated on the site are not specifically protected by Orono ’s current ordinances, but are protected under the Wetland Conservation Act which MCWD administers on Orono ’s behalf No variance for the wetland impacts is required under Orono ’s current ordinances. Excerpts from the wetland mitigation and stormwater ponding plan for the fire station are attached as Exhibits C & D. The sketch on the following page shows the relationships between the fire station layout, the existing wetlands and areas that need to be filled, proposed mitigation areas, proposed stormwater ponding, and utility corridors. 1 »2755 Long Lake Fire Station Site Febrtiary 15,2002 Page 4 Stormwater Management . Development of the fire station site results in approximately 60% of Lot 1 being hardsurfaced. A stormwater pond sized to serve the needs of Lot 1 cannot be constructed within Lot 1 unless Lot I is substantially expanded. A pond location directly east of Lot 1 could have possible negative impacts on the future development potential of Lot 2. However, a somewhat linear pond that could serve Lot 1 with the ability to expand it to serve Lot 2, is feasible north of the creek in Lot 2. This pond would be sandwiched beuveen the creek and the sewerAvater lines which will cross Lot 2 (see Preliminary Plat draw'ing). If additional ponding is ultimately needed to serve a higher intensity use than anticipated on Lot 2, it could be developed as a second linear cell north of the sewer/water line corridor. Because the actual use of Lot 2 has not been determined, it is the City’s intent to delay expansion of ponding to serve Lot 2 until Lot 2 is developed. A City stormw ater trunk fee would normally be charged to a plat such as this, based on the acreage and use of the site per the current fee schedule. The Fire Station site (Lot 1) would be considered as commcrcial/industrial if the fee is charged, currently $6,480 per acre. Lot 2 would be charged as a residential site, although the per acre fee amount is based on the actual development density which is not yet known. The City Council will ultimately determine whether any stormwater trunk fees should be due for this subdivision. City ordinance allows the City to develop policies in regards to trunk fee credits when a developer provides stormwater facilities that provide benefits greater than just to the development site. Such policies are not currently in place. 1 #2755 Long Lake Fire Station Site February 15, 2002 Pages Sewer & Water Serv ice. Sewer and water service to the site will be provided by Long Lake. Water lines will come from the east and be looped north along Willow to the existing Long Lake water tower. Lots 1 and 2 will be served with sewer by an extension of Long Lake lines from the east. The sewer/watcr lines have been located to allow for the most cfTicient layout possible for Lot 2 given all the necessary encroachments. The preliminary plat as proposed leaves approximately 1.6 acres in Lot 2 unencumbered by wetlands, buffers, stormwater ponding or sewer/watcr easements. A future road/driveway in Lot 2 could be constructed above the sewer/water lines. Because the sewer and water lines will be tied into the Long Lake systems, no sewer or water connection charges w ill be due to Orono for the fire station site. Sewer and water connection charges for future development of residential uses on Lot 2 will have to be coordinated with Long Lake. Woodlands. The site is mostly open, with some wooded areas along the creek beds near the south and east boundaries of the property. The City's goal w ill be minimize tree removals w hen the stormwater pond is expanded to serve Lot 2. Park Dedication. The Orono Comprehensive Trail System Plan includes a future trail link along Willow Drive from Hackberry Park northward to a future trail that would parallel the new Highway 12 route westward to County Road 6 and Baker Park. In addition, the City has had discussions w ith MnDOT regarding a trail connection along the south side of the new 12 corridor east from Willow, connecting to relocated Holbrook Park in Long Lake, which abuts the cast boundary of Lot 2. Park Commission should review this preliminary plat and make a recommendation as to whether any land dedication or trail easements are necessary from this property. The City Council w ill ultimately decide whether park dedication will be waived for part or all of this plat, given the public ov. nv.rship of the site. II. Fire Station Setback Variance The setback variance for the fire station is directly attributable to the occurrence of linear wetland.*^ along the south property boundary. These wetlands must be preserved to the greatest extent possibh;, and a 16' buffer is additionally required. Due to minimum City requirements for road and shoulder widths, the road/driveway corridor had to be widened to 60' as it enters the site from Willow, and even wider to minimize wetland impacts toward the rear of Lot 1. Nevertheless, a road corridor is necesiary to access the rear of the site. A road corridor along the north lot line would be undesirable from a safety standpoint due to proximity to the Willow Drive Bridge over new 12 coupled with the dual fire appaiatus return access and residential use this corridor must serve. The most feasible location for the road corridor is south of the station, and the characteristics of the land dictate the location of the corridor. The location of the fire station is relatively fixed based on the need for parking lot access and parking stalls on the north end of the building, minimum setback requirements, and the required lengtii of the building to serve the needs of the fire department. Moving the building an additional 10 ’ northward ^o avoid the variance would have resulted in re-design of the site plan and the building. M27SS Long Lake Fire Stalioi: Site February IS. 2002 Page 6 The basis for a SO' side street setback requirement for institutional/municipal buildings is to minimize the impact on the surrounding neighborhood. The fire station will be situated 100 feet from the south lot line of the property, and the road will be moved further off the lot line to avoid impacting the linear wetlands. Both factors tend to minimize impact of the variance on the only directly affected neighboring property, the Miller residence to the south. That residence is located approximately 100' from its north lot line, or about 200' from the fire station building. Staff" Recommendation . Staff recommends approval of the setback variance as proposed, based on the site factors noted above which pose hardships preventing the station from being moved to meet the required setback. 111. CUP for Hose Tower Height The hose tower height is necessary for it to perform a number of functions. Its primary purpose is for firefighter training, containing stairways, windows, a door to the roof, etc. whicli allow for a variety of realistic firefighting and rescue scenarios to be staged. Its secondary use is to elevate hoses for drying. This dual purpose makes the tower an important element of the station if budget allows. Hose towers are sometimes treated as an important architectural design element of fire stations where the location makes it suitable for use as a clock tower or signature design feature. The Long Lake station will be located in a neighborhood setting rather than a ‘town center’ setting, and reducing the prominence of the tower will minimize its visual impact on the neighborhood. The tower is proposed to be located at the southeast comer of the building where it will be relatively unobtrusive in the neighborhood as opposed to if it was located near the front of the building. Its flat roof will extend approximately 12' above the 23 ’ flat roof height of the majority of the station building or a total of 35' in height where 30' is the normal maximum allowed. The 20' x 22' area of the tower covers just under 3% of the total roof area of the station, hence it is a relatively small feature in the context of the overall visual impact of the station. Comments received from the adjacent property owner have been included as Exhibit F. Stqff Recommendation . In addition to recommending approval of the CUP for the tower in its proposed configuration, staffrecommends that no signage be allowed on the tower, and that its facade materials match the rest of the building so that it does not become unnecessarily noticeable, and the tower itself should not be lighted. Summary of Issues for Discussion 1.There are no specific code standards for granting a CUP for hose tower height in Zoning Code Section 10.75 Subd. 1. Does Planning Commission feel any conditions other than those proposed by staff are necessary in order to allow the 35' tower? ' T ilWiV 'tffgT*!* ► #27SS Long Lake Fire Station Site February IS, 2002 Page? 2.Do the hardships stated in the text support the granting of the setback variance? Are there any significant impacts ofthe 40' setback that should be mitigated by attaching specific conditions to the variance approval? 3.Arc there any issues with the proposed plat that Planning Commission has concerns about? Are fiiere any unresolved issues which would prevent the plat from moving forward to Council for Preliminary Plat Approval? Does Planning Commission accept the status of Lot 2 as a building site for future use and probable rezoning to match the CMP densities of 2-3 units per acre, or should it be platted as an outlot requiring future approval before it can be developed? Staff Recommendatioii Staff recommends approval of the proposed 2-lot plat subject to MCWD wetland mitigation and stormwater management plan approval. Because this is a joint project between the cities of Orono and Long Lake for a municipal building, the City Council should determine whether impact fees such as park dedication/fees and stormwater trunk fees are applicable. Staff recommends approval of the variance to allow a 40 ’ side street setback where 50' would normally be required, based on the hardships enumerated in the staff report. Staff recommends approval of the CUP for a hose tower 35' in height where the maximum allowed building height is normally 30', subject to a condition that no signage be allowed on the tower, and that its facade materials match the rest of the building so »hat it does not become unnecessarily noticeable, and that it not be lighted. Planning Commission Options for Action 1. Recommend approval per staff recommendation. 2. Recommend approval with additional conditions or stipulations. 3. Recommend denial of part or all of the proposal. 4. Table for further information (specify). 5.Other. i PRELIMINARY PLA FOR WILLOWFIRE ADD '2 ' ‘ I f i '*■ * iA \V / 4 \ ‘u >, i w . I f ^ ; I. I U" - ('1*11' fc!:ry >•• %~f7■'llli S §'1 ''‘irl"! V./ S,. -,jW. . ilrif ; - 'ifeiM'rf ■'I ta * / S ''' > ''' ' ^ >< ^0 .7C5 A > ^ mm riia •V V ! i h. life ! f" r: i w; -x -" '■‘riAr'S ! A ;is.h »* v I •- '4> o '•> ■■a') I J/' I (^- \ —> < ■ ® > 1 \ t z^zr. KTZ I 0A / »^v / >l:tN?AL£ : vv:- GRAPHIC SCALE • Mr . ilssm WorMt Qmr Out Yaru U9t»t fl09 PoM Po«M Polu Guy Afidiur 9«n 0«M Wr« r«x« Wdo Om Potcu Mr* Mum F«noi arfurjrs: •• pMt t«im Mt-M IM • 41? wmut 55b ;^--sjx—— 4 uitirv ♦/-i«r lofina DM1B HUT Mi. PiiMim NAtCMDI tmnommmm roam.Ut r YOU POL HMT HOT MAY C MRT OjUOrr HPmCKfON OT « OTK or TMi ^ on OTOUT M OT < WWNOTP. _ POR MIY UNMIlNOnaBD OT OR iM IRtI I «n • 4Ay iM •# om titit tn RyiiM tr .MSB* m OTOTMt JIO MAM ANt ROT SiSmTSi mm* CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA PRELIMINARY PLAT WILLOWFIRE ADDITION nuNO. MCLSU020t.3S 0*TC 02/0t/02 2 I i'^ Vsi*J < * te^=, ' ' > w*^. * • tk* » i, \/' / y // y i /V f 14/' 7vj>*r /TjA *^1/7,. \ 2s/.-:!;»-:.-—^"- ;y1V /■ ii §■'■ iTJS^i -693.00 N8935‘19”W----- ^ '4 V* j // ; « / ■'-..JrCv' Iw I ^^=s.ea>=^ ^ Ac ,'"T0TAL»6.17 Ac pf;5fe22?I w r iiwmi i^i p/(S^^o ^ ------------ ^ ^A' ■^5 iiiSiii Ji,* liSiWisC: G O G e Pi ra^\‘ic ^.IzJ 1-s-eR MARK 1004.69 14' 1001.32 \ ilP'S fRii Wm9p aba IPsBii +1000 N ITERWNE BURi illi^gl!AJHIK^i IMI je*S. 9H OOMI Of SCCTON li. Till. R23 t UNC or W1/4 or seem ii p MRT Quorr MOmOKMN MC. 2002. ANY UK OR KUK or Mi PumMMtmiknptm MK « GRAPHIC SCALE M Ktl I an • «N, ,IS«Si CITY OF ORONO,PREUMINARY PLAT nte NO MGLSU0201.3S 2 / MINNESOTA WILLOWFIRC ADDITION UTf 02/01/02 / 2 ■“ •Ml 1 r-ONtmQUAMUUAI f LOCATION TREE A . . w —693 N«KS^19-W IHI I ml II I ii ^ ^eORC 84 AaORE 89 8'^' REMO^ A RfiNiTALL DOSmO fa.T FOCC NEdSMIlV PON CONfTRUCnON f EXCAVATION 21.fMCV.(P) EARTHWORK SUMMARY Ltr >CV(F) EXCESS QVENiUNOCN (PAOSUNCHAME) IHSaSCY.tn l.ilSCYtH limQATIQNNMD l»CY.(P) SALVAGED T0P80E. S00CYCC.V.) SACKFEL M0&Y.(C.V4 ONSITEQNANULANI ■te.v.CLv.1 TONOFWAaiOOtJ mc.v.^ i»«?ONUiSOFIIOIIU»SEVOUJMi|LV.|TO(l¥0UM|C.V) LwT0FWMi.1FT8ajDWam08 RETAIMNO wall elevation BKV G R O u p i£sm •Found Iron Wpo Trovorto Station G Ooeidkiou! Troo *Coniforouo Trot Sol Oorlns «WI Monholo Ooon Out Yord li^t FIo9 Polo ♦ e«tad Mr* Fane* «6od«i Fotcc l««Ni fmc9 Inptoes Sit F«ic« (MC) Architecture Interior Design Engineering Boarman Kroos Vogel Group Inc. 222 North Second Street Minneapolis. MN 55401 Telephone: 612.339.3752 Facsimle: 612.339.6212 www.bkvgroup.com CONSULTANTS PHONE: (952) 912-2M0 10901 R«d C:rcl« OfivB Minnetonka. MN 55343-9100 PROJECT TITLE LONG LAKE FIRE STATION LONG LAKE, MINNESOTA Propoeed Contoure Future Contours (MC) Cirittins Contour! Futuro tor ton mtuot (MC) smEETTITLE ' FuIut! 12* iNtormoin (MC) IVopo—d Storm Sow botol Hoevy Duty Sit Fonco SITE GRADINO Key Notes ^ B4PtACE ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTHANC£(MC) ^ MSTALLRCP CL V STORM SEWER ^ MSTAU. TYPE Y CATCH 9A8M MANHOLE ^ MSTAU TYPE X CATCH SASBI ^ MSTAU RCP APRON wrOEOTEXTEC ^ FAMCStCYOASSIBRMIP ^ RETAMMOWMLCSEEARCMniCTBnANS) ^ 9912 OM A GUTTER ^ ttiicuRtsourriR ^ COMMERCIAL ORNEWAY ^ CONCRETESIOCWALX ^ PCDESTRIANOURIRAMP AND DRAINAGE PLAN CERTVICATION loo 0!iV«»«iWreqr MMlimiodir idfui 12121 STORM STRUCTURE SCHEDULE STRUCTURE Na r-vi Tmumu PPE SUE LENGTH SLOPE FLOWS TO ---- ir 119 1JM 101 tr 4r ■ms 902 •.•. sr sr J0%104 REVISIONS No DATE DATE Mum 11 MB DRAWN 8V CHECKED SY COMMWtION NO.tftftOI a »ni SKVOmairk Hiy sMipM iiwIaHil tMt Mcyrtd from twim<gliiy timmoi 5om IM iKo. E»cpriti • ooo-fpot tiibcwl «ntf ripioco te vilK dm iipM to! for • M (illy Iho tann on Itio for mo root of «io mo i io mMmito4. Sol itnmion. motiM So Itfl undMInf ly • Mioo So o pittom lo mo ooimfis men. lo oni nom mo oSo mooM so fiiifiMiitf to ovoM N meS SorS wm So rwtofid to odoUnf oMion end i Conomimin. lo oonotnmion oM oceor 9 votor io flooin« lliroiigh tho mSIpotiofi oHoI not occur prior to April IS. B SuoSmorw nm mrmod Sy frodSig oSoB So fruSSod ond otump trotlid oBfi B^phoiplirto 2 •ooko prior to nolNt oocdTilp or pionlinp. tontSof molorlol oSoi: So oesutrod oo om oo poooWo ond proporod occoninB to mdoo FQBulroniinli, Aocoptmii ouSillhitio oro Bolod Si mo oSm o Mn/DOT mSrturo SA modWIod (S0) in Iho buff or [IwoSidlwS mo norm Sons) ond oBh Mn/DOT ndoturo 2SA rnomiod (2Bi) oimin tho ooMond oroo. mm oro opplod ol o roto of 30 ISo/ocro. Iio onliro oMo So dMk ondioro uNh dm wood froo oiroo fOBouSig poodbig o ooodSif ohoB So dono Si opon or otondbip votor rooo ohm So pMod o ndnlmum of 10-fool oporl ohouM So ooneonSotod donf dio ooidinB dlch, SidydSif Iho on mo oopoocd Sonho. Olhor dwuSo mm So ptontod from conloSior or pdlinfo in o mndom orrmpomont ohhSi tho dwipnlod orooo. «B So ploeod oround ooch tioo ond ohruS plonMnp to o dopm of ol loool 3 Sioord lo moSiloSi moioturo. R foncSif dim So moSitoSiod oround tho ontiro porSnolor of tho miBBOtlon oroo unlB mBoloOon lo OMCcooohdSf ooloSimod. uMpIo oil fonco. or oouSmnt BMP. ohoB So wood oSthSi tho dhch Sde* tho oiU oceooo ond Motom proporty Soundory. Sod fiSor Sionhol ohm So wood on tho Sormo lo So conoSudod on tho fSr oootom ond oooS rdfo of tho mUipotion oho. dm wood froo otrov ond dMS onchorSig «M So wood for tho of tho oho. foSrIc uH So ploeod Sonoom tho riprop otonp tho outtol from Sio rolo oontrd pond, m euttSip of tho pond oullol dwl only So dono Si Sooo ^-3 A i.'ioOlP^ 1 POND QRAOINO DESIGN LANOSCAPINOANO TURP ESTABLISHMENT cemFCATION -----693,00 ------ S89-25'19*E ISrnotfwmrnv Miuaeowy T. */ J□ 'C / idfiBl G G PREUMINARY HOTron----- mmiii A LECEwn n«o more MFiNDice «- re.T PLANTING SCHEDULE ~ SYima PUdfT suBSTinroN Bull OAK NCO OMC (Oimous NUMA) OR «M1C OMI (OUfROUS MM) o QRGOf A9I MACK AM iimAmM MMRA), RD MAMX (ACCR RURRUy^ OR HAOonRv (can ooobcntaus ) •SLVOI MWU RUCK AM (FRMMIS MORAL RD IMRU <ACOI NURNUM). OR HACKRoanr (can oookntmm ) ■ 4J:AMOSCAN cm mmm rassmooo (itJA ahorcmia ) mpp^bcbubs NAMnRORrr (mwrnuh uhtaoo ) way rc mojudcd re MQKAXCnOiaTV — construction ipwukui Da.ivBBi|AMDmAa(i«U0BriM&BciBomiAfti mEBmir BiiMi MiAm NBBABUBCRVMUIMfALBNBIIBimNRIOINiBAIllAfTmDOPIHiPIIOmcrmOULDANOmmuiDNOT M m 3001 BdV( / / / r n pOSSiBL.^ iP5C POSSIBLE SEPTIC SITE _J G.C.- COORD. C0N5TR. OF ENTRANCE DRIVE W/ MNDOT CONSRT. SCHEDULE OCiSTtNG TfteCB TO RETMUN TTP ^1—dONAOe PROPERTY LINE EBI <Oi E< 51 ALI CCA5T CONC - BCT MALI cutm CUT- _ M ^ __ M.c cun cu^MALK TTP Q-- FLAC PC3LC FM- - .2; 5CC 5MCCT A2 FOR ROOF PLAN al ^FUTURC 2 LOCA BiTUrilNOUB PAVING (MIGM OCH5«Tr Sj^CTlCW^ CONC APRON faAsc e»o uxjatioh;- e^i? CONC CURB TTP ly'K^TCRHATE m . > ^^CURO LINE —-g^-v Jalt m LocfeiON;-^ ] ^TUrMOUB PAVMC (’MIGN OOISiTT 5CCTIW FOR LARGE VEM*CLC5>- PTO 5TRIPE5 CONC. APRON TRA^ tHOjOMt GEN « PAD 3Ul 8^ io. is 38 ^^7 sfso' R.O.H NEW THROOGR“STREET ______{ti.l&BY CITY) TiniTs”dF CONSTRUCTION ^s1 lt “feScFline .r-MOrainU.lNI LV N^H4 January 31,2002 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Permit Application Long Lake Fire Station Prepared for the City of Orono, Minnesota Introduction This permit application has been prepared to describe the proposed construction of a new fire station in the City of Orono, Minnesota. The Long Lake Fire Department serves the City of Long Lake, part or Orono, and part of Medina. Minnesota. The construction of the new fire station is a result of the impending loss of the current firehouse to the expansion of Trunk Highway (TH) 12. The demonstration of wetland impact avoidance and minimization in this application follows the sequencing process of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 (WCA) and Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. Unavoidable wetland impacts will occur due to this project. The loss of wetland for the creation of the fire station, vehicle access, parking areas, and turning space is subject to wetland replacement through the creation or restoration of mitigation sites specific to this project as required by the WCA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This application contains the infc.ination required by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) to fulfill the requirements of Rule B (Erosion Control). Rule C (Floodplain Alteration), Rule D (Wetland Protection), and Rule N (Stormwater Management). These Rules have been summarized in Appendix G. This permit application was reviewed by the MCWD and brought before the Board for approval at the December 13, 2001 meeting. At this meeting the initial grading plan was approved which allowed for soils correction and impacting the wetland on the site. The mitigation design, erosion control plan, and storm water management plan have not yet been approved by the MCWD for this project. A-LON6L0204 00 Pag*1 Project Description Project Location The new fire station is located in the NW V* of the SW V* of Section 34. Township 118N. Range 23W, in Hennepin County. Minnesota (Figure 1). The project is within the city limits of Orono, Minnesota. The property faces Willow Drive to the west and is bound by private property on the remaining three sides. The Burlington Northern rail line passes just to the north of the project area outside of the property. The project site is accessible to traffic only from Willow Drive. Existing Conditions Land use in the project area is primarily single-family residential or undeveloped. An existing house and bam on the west half of the property have been removed under the initial grading permit issued by the MCWD. The remainder of the property is undeveloped. The undeveloped areas include both open pasture and wooded / scrub- shrub habitats. This includes a single wooded / scrub-shrub wetland in the western half of the property. This wetland has been impacted under the terms of the initial grading permit issued by the MCWD and a LOP-B issued by the USACE. An unnamed drainage ditch enters near the southwest comer of the property and runs parallel to the southern property line for approximately 325 feet. At this point, it enters the property and meanders to the east-northeast within the project area. The area of the site selected for the creation of a wetland mitigation site, upland buffer, and a storm water treatment pond is currently a nearly level plateau adjacent to the unnau.ed ditch. Vegetation in these areas is approximately 90% common buckthorn {Rhamnus cathartica). Proposed Improvements The new fire station will serve the communities on Orono, Medina, and Long Lake. The proposed fire station will be approximately 18,360 feet^ which includes administrative and training areas, and six pull-through bays. The bays will be designed so that the trucks can enter directly onto Willow Drive, as required for minimum response time. To do this, sufficient space must be constructed behind the fire station to maneuv^' the larger vehicles to be facing properly. Access roadwavs will be constructed on the north and south sides of the building. These roads will provide access to the firehouse for responders and for parking the fire trucks. The south access road will also provide a throughway to the remainder of the property to the east. An overhead layout of the property that shows the wetland impacts and construction limits is available in Figure 2. Additional plan sheets of the project are available in Appendix A and Appendix B. i i Minnehaha Creak Watershed District Permit Application City ol Orono, Mbinesota A-LONQL0204.00 Page 2 Construction of the building pad requires that the existing soils be removed and replaced with proper building material. The existing silty clay topsoil will be stockpiled and replaced atop a sand and gravel base. The stockpile will be on-site, but will be placed away from existing wetlands and will have proper erosion control. As required by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for Rule D an average 16.S -foot buffer will be maintained along the unnamed drainage ditch. The location and widths of this buffer along with the site plans showing the grading limits are available in Appendix A. The initial grading and soils corrections have been completed as allowed by the MCWD and the USACE. Project Justification The Minnesota Department of Transportation purchased the current fire station as a right-ofrway for the future realignment of TH 12. The fire station is considered to be an essential service and must be replaced prior to the start of TH 12 reconstruction in January 2003. The new fire station will jointly serve the communities of Long Lake, Medina, and Orono, Minnesota. Wetlands Wetland Delineation Mr. Deric Deuschle (SEH) delineated the wetlands in the western half of the property on December 5, 2001. The field delineation was done to identify and delineate any areas meeting the wetland criteria in accordance with the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (USACE, 1987). Becau.se the wetland delineation was conducted outside of the normal growing season, a more conservative boundary was determined. Staff from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (Jim Hafner and Mike Wyatt), the Hennepin Conser\ation District, and the City or Orono reviewed and accepted the delineation on December 6, 2001. The delineated wetland boundary was surveyed with a Trimble ProXR® GPS system and converted into AutoCAD® format. The remaining wetlands on the eastern half of the property were delineated and surveyed using GPS on December 8, 2001. The wetland delineation completed for the eastern half of the property has not yet been reviewed or approved, but was determined under similar conditions as the portion of the property that was reviewed. Topographic maps (Figure 3), the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map (Figure 4), the Soil Survey for Hennepin County (Figure 5), the hydric soil list for Hennepin County, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR) Protected Waters Inventory (PWI) map (Figure 6). and aerial photographs (Figure 7) were reviewed to locate potential wetland habitats prior to the field visit. Minnehaha Creak Watershed District Permit Application City of Orono, Mkinesota A-LONOL0204.00 Pages In addiUon to the unnamed ditch that entere the property from the west, a single wetland (wooded, scrub-shrub swamp) was identified. This was located in the southwest quarter of the property and will be unavoidably impacted by the siting of the new fire station. The wetland identified on the property is dominated by mature black willow (SalLx nigra), red-osier dogwood (Comus stolonifera), and common buckthorn {Rhamnus cathartica). Fringe species include eastern cottonwood {Populus deltoides), tartarian honeysuckle {Lonicera japonica), prickly ash (Zanthoxylum americanum) and common buckthorn. Herbaceous vegetation was sparse, but included reed canary grass {Phalaris arundinacea), an unidentified woodland sedge (Carejt sp.), unidentified ferns, and ground ivy {Glechoma hederacea). Common buckthorn was a dominant plant throughout most of the upland and wetland areas. Soils in the wetland were composed of dense, black clay (2.5Y2.5/1). Some higher chroma inclusions were also observed and appeared to be the result of past disturbance. At approximately 14 inches, the soils changed to massive black clay (2.5/N) with no other colors being observed. Within the wetland areas, there were inclusions of disturbed soil (2.5Y4/4 and 2.5Y5/5) that displayed distinct mottling (7.5YR4/4) that may have been masked by the darker components. Organic content of the soils was very high within the wetland boundary. Heavy dark clays dominated upland soils. Higher chroma inclusions were also observed in the upland soils, but the frequency and contrast of mottling was less than in the wetland samples. Organic content was also less in the upland soil samples. The Hennepin County Soil Survey has mapped the site as Glencoe silty clay loam, Minnetoka silty clay loam, and Shorewood silty clay loam. The observed soil profiles were similar to the mapped soils, with the exception of the disturbed areas. Minnetonka and Glencoe silty clay loams are identified on the Hennepin County hydric soils list. Hydrology was not observed within the top 18 inches in either the wetland or upland samples. This may be due to numerous factors including the abnormally dry fall or start of the winter season. Because*of the time of year the delineation was conducted, hydrology was assumed within the area of hydrophytic vegetation exhibiting hydric soil. Secondary hydrologic indicators including drainage patterns, and shallow and exposed roots suggest hydrologic conditions in the wetland area. The wetlands on the remainder of the site are restricted to the areas between the top of the bank along the drainage ditch. This drainage ditch has a very shallow gradient and low banks on the west half of the property, but has become more deeply fissured as it flows east. The IWInn^taha CrMk Waltrahad District Permit AppUcalion City ot Orono, Mtotnesoto A-LONQL0204.00 Pag* 4 rte M Mimi mP. shallow areas have vegetation composed primarily of reed canary erass and a few isolated cattail stands. The portion of the ditch with steeper banks has very sparse reed canary grass at the bottom of the ditch and exposed banks. The wetland has been identified as the top of the bank for the entire drainage ditch. This is a conservative estimate under the assumption that surface and groundwater to not saturate the soils to the top of the bank under normal conditions. Hydraulic calculations on the existing drainage ditch support this assumption (Appendix F). Wetland soils on the eastern half of the property are either a mucky silty clay in areas with little or no flow to sandy accumulations were the ditch has flowing water. Upland areas on the eastern half of the property are composed of dark (10YR2/2) silty clay loams. The banks along the ditch are steep and have becomes exposed and unstable. Hydrology was observed within the ditch as flowing water or saturated soils. On the banks and in the upland areas, hydrology within the top 20 inches was not observed. Routine Onsite Delineation Method field datasheets for the wetland delineation are included in Appendix C. Photographs of the impacted wetland are included in Appendix D. Sequencing Alternatives Alternatives for this project are limited. The no-build alternative was considered, but not accepted. The fire station is considered an essential service and must be located within quick access of the cities served and be convenient to the existing volunteer firefighters. This property is the only available site found to be suitably located for service to the coiiununities and with access to major transportation corridors. A second alternative was to rotate the building 90 degrees so that it would be perpendicular to Willow Drive. This was not accepted for numerous reasons, including reduced response time by not having direct access to Willow Drive. It was also determined that rotating the building would not reduce wetland impacts. Because the fire trucks must pull through the bays, the amount of driveway lot space required to make the turns into the building would impact the same amount of wetland. Backing the fire trucks into the bap poses major traffic safety concerns as the trucks would be blocking W’illow Drive. Because ol poor sight lines caused by the bridge over the Burlington Northern Railroad north of the property, any alternative that involved trucks backing up on Willow Drive was rejected. Minnehaha Creek Walerehed District Permit AppHcation City of Orono, Minnesota A-LONOL0204.00 Pages Further reducing the size of the building to avoid wetland impacts was also considered*'but would make the fire department less functional, and may require an additional fire station to be constructed within one of the communities. Avoidance and Minimization The construction of a new fire station will have unavoidable wetland impacts. Minimization of wetland impacts was achieved by moving the building as far north as possible. The distance the fire station can be moved is limited by existing property lines. The property to the north is not owned by either city and would need to be condemned before it could be purchased. There is not enough calendar time available to condemn the property and still construct the fire station before the e.xisting fire station is removed Reducing the size of the fire station also minimized wetland impacts. The original plan for the building had a footprint of 26,000 square feet. The current building footprint is 18,360 square feet resulting in a reduction of 7,600 square feel from the original design. The width of the southern access road has been reduced to 28 feet and provides main access to the site and the remnant parcel to the east. Both access drives to the north and south of the site are required so that first responders can access the site during a fire call without traffic conflict. The north access drive will be reconfigured twice during the construction of TH 12 as the Willow Drive bridge over the railroad is replaced and a temporary bridge is in place during TH 12 construction. The south access road will be critical during this period. The circulation area around the firehouse has been reduced as much as possible. These leaves the minimal space needed to park responder’s vehicles and still maneuver fire trucks into the bays. Wetland Impacts and Regulatory Jurisdiction The wetland on the property will be impacted by the creation of a new fire station and the creation of a required storm water treatment pond. The areas of the building pad a.nd lot within the wetland are shown on Figure 2 and in the detailed plan sheets in Appendix A. A total of 8,480 square feel of wetland will be impacted for the construction of an access road to the fire station. A storm water pond is also proposed to provide treatment to runoff from the fire station property. This pond will release the treated water back into the drainage ditch that crosses the property. To protect the pond outlet, 110 square feel of riprap will be placed around it. A total of 8.590 square feel of wetland will be impacted by this project. Minnehaha Creak Waterahed Oiatilcl Permit AppNcatton City ol Orono. Mtomeeota A-LCNQL0204.00 Pages The impacted wetland is connected to the unnamed ditch, which ultimately drains into Long Lake. This ditch is part of a large system of public ditches in the project vicinity. Because it is connected to a navigable water, The United States Army Corps of Engineers has determined that the impacted wetland is under their Jurisdiction. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources does not identify the impacted wetland and associated ditch as a Protected Water or Wetland and does not have jurisdiction over wetland impacts for this project. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has jurisdiction over wetland impacts within the cities of Orono and Long Lake as the Local Government Unit implementing the rules of the WCA in the project area. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District also has specific wetland regulations that it enforces in addition to those identifies in the WCA. The Combined Permit Application Notice for General Projects, and the Combined Joint Notification Form for the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District have been included at the beginning of this document. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Impacts to Wetlands on the property are under the jurisdiction of the USACE as the basin is connected to a navigable water (Long Lake). A permit (LOP-B) has been granted for this project provided the submittal of an acceptable mitigation plan. A copy of the permit has been included in Appendix E Minnesota Department of Natural Resources The wetland being impacted by this project is not listed as a Protected Water or Wetland. The MNDNR has waived jurisdiction on this project and no permit is required. Wetland Conservation Act - Minnehaha Creek Watershed District The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District is the Local Government Unit responsible for implementing the Wetland Conservation Act in the project area. This is a request for approval of the proposed wetland replacement plan under the WCA, and erosion control plan, and storm water management plan under the rules of the MC\^^. A grading plan for the building site was approved on December 14,2(X)1 to allow the project to continue. The wetland present on the property has been impacted under this initial grading plan agreement. Wetland Replacement The Minnesota Welland Conservation Act requires replacement of wetland impacts at a ratio of two acres for each acre filled or drained. Application of the 2:1 replacement ratio results in the need for the Minnehaha Craak Watershad Oislrict Parmii Application City of Orono, Mkinaaoia A>LONGL0204.00 Paga7 «# following area of wetland replacement: 8,590 fr wetland fill x 2 = 17,180 ft^ (0.39 acres) replacement. Replacement for wetlands that are filled due to the project will be done through the creation of a single mitigation site. The location of the mitigation site will be on-site and will be located south of the drainage ditch and along the eastern and southern property boundaries (Appendix B). Wetland Mitigation Design Site Selection The opportunity for on-site mitigation exists within the project area. Examination of the site indicated that there was potential to create new wetland by excavating an area adjacent to the ditch in the southeast comer of the property. Currently, this area of the property is a monotypic stand of buckthorn. Few other species have been observed. This is also true of the area north of the drainage ditch, which will he converted into upland buffer and a storm water treatment pond. This area is owned by the City of Orono and will be placed under an easement associated with the fire station. A utility easement may be placed over the storm water pond. Construction of the mitigation site will be concurrent with construction of the fire station. The site has not been used for prior wetland restoration or construction. Mitigation Design Plan The mitigation site is proposed to be constructed adjacent to the unnamed drainage ditch in the southeast comer of the property. This area of the property is currently undeveloped, and has become overgrown with buckthorn. This area is not wetland currently, and is not known to have been a wetland based on a review of historical aerial photographs. Plan sheets detailing the grading, planting, and erosion control for the mitigation site arc available in Appendix B. Grading, Hydrolog>% *ind Soils Grading of the mitigation site has been designed as a floodplain wetland that will interce^ i floodwater and slowiy release it back to the ditch (Appendix B. Sheet 1). Functionally, this is similar to the wetland impacted by the construction of the fire station. Grading elevations have been designed so that the mitigation site will remain an average of one-foot higher in elevation than the adjacent ditch. This is to keep the wetland isolated from the ditch except during flooding events. A low berm, designed to be one-foot tall by thrcc-fcct wide, will be constructed at the far eastern and western portion of the mitigation site where floodwater will cntei and leave. The grading has Minnehaha Creek Watershed District PemUt Application City of Orono, Minnesota A-LONOL0204.00 Pages been designed so that an adjacent wetland will be created, not a side channel to the drainage ditch. Side slopes within the mitigation site will be a minimum 5:1 along the southern property line and a minimum of 10:1 where it lies adjacent to the existing ditch. The bottom elevations of the wetland will be left rough to provide a diverse bottom contour and to decrease possible channelization by moving water. No construction shall take place if the site is inundated or has potential floodwater in the immediate future. Hydrology in the mitigation area will be primarily from natural flooding'of the drainage ditch. Hydrologic modeling of the existing drainage ditch has indicated that it is a very flashy system with rapid rises and falls in water elevation and discharge (Appendix F). The elevation of the mitigation site has been designed so that when water levels rise one foot above base flow in the ditch, water will be allowed to enter the mitigation site. This water will be held in the mitigation area by a second berm. Hydrology is expected to mimic a small floodplain area with short term, seasonal inundation. It is anticipated that the mitigation site will appear to be dry for most of the growing season. This is similar to the hydrology in the impacted wetland. Hydrology will also enter the mitigation site as surface runoff from the south, but most of the hydrology will be from the adjacent stream. Ground water is not expected to be a significant hydrology source. Soils in the wetland mitigation area are silty clay loam or clay loam. This is consistent with the soils on the remainder of the site. During construction, all soils within the mitigation site will be removed and taken off-site. A one-foot subcut will be dug and replaced with clean upland topsoil. The repl; ...nent soil must also be a silty clay loam or clay loam and must not contain buckthorn or other known invasive species. This soil will be finished to final grade and loosened if excessive compaction has occurred. Using the same soil type as the impacted wetland will further reproduce similar conditions. Heavy soils, such as silty clay loam or clay loam will also reduce infiltration rates and increase retention following flooding events. To prevent erosion, the entire site will be disk anchored with clean weed-free straw immediately after final grading, loosening, and seeding. Vegetation Prior to construction, existing buckthorn in the area will be cleared and grubbed. In areas that will not be graded, the buckthorn will be cleared and have stumps treated with a 2% solution of glyphosphate. This is especially important in the buffer area north of the ditch. This area will be planted with native vegetation and will require the Mnnehaha Creek Watenhed Dielfict PermN Appttcetkxi City of Orono, Mkmeaole A-LONGL0204.00 Pege9 L_ buckthorn be eliminated. No planting should occur for at Iciurt two weeks following glyphosphate treatment. In the wetland mitigation site, trees, shrubs and ground cover will be planted to restore native vegetation to the area (Appendix B, Sheet 2). Immediately following final grading, the soil should be loosened and broadcast with a wetland seed mix. The Mn/DOT seed mixture 25A modified (26B) (Prairie Meadow & Streambank) or equivalent will be used in the wetland area to provide a mixture of native forbs and ground cover. The Mn/DOT mixture 5A Modified (5B) (Savanna and Woodland Edge) will be used in the upland buffer areas south of the mitigation site and north of the existing ditch (Appendix B, Sheet 1). Both of these mixes will be applied at a rate of 30 pounds per acre, and will not be seeded prior to April 15. Seed will only be broadcast into dry or saturated soils. Seed should not be placed into standing or moving water. The site should be disk anchored immediately following seeding to provide erosion control on the site. Mulching will be done at a rate of 2 tons per acre and must be certified weed free. Because the site is designed to be a floodplain, trees such as silver maple (Actr saccarinum), green ash {Fraxinus pennsylvanica), and American elm {Ulmus americana) will be planted (Appendix B, Sheet 2). If these species arc unavailable they may be substituted with black ash (Fraxinus nigra), red maple (Acer rubra) or hackberry (Celtus occidenialis). At least one third of the planted trees must be five-year or older trees with intact root balls. This is necessary to increase the survival rate and ensure the proper vegetation becomes established. Additional tree plantings can be seedlings. In the buffer area, bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa) will be planted to provide additional tree cover. If bur oak is unavailable, than red oak (Quercus rubra) or white oak (Quercus alba) maybe substituted. Half of the oaks should be mature trees. For all trees, the mature stock should be spread throughout the site to provide maximum coverage. At least three inches of hardwood mulch will be spread at the base of all the trees and shaped to help retain moisture. No trees should be planted in standing water, and all trees should be a minimum of ten feel apart. No trees will be planted in the buffer area north of the drainage ditch. The large black willow (Salix nigra) within the drainage ditch on the east side of the property will be preserved. No black willow or cottonwood (Populus deltoides) should be planted in the mitigation site. Because these species can be grown from cuttings, any branches of these trees should 1^ removed from the mitigation area. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Permit Application City of Oiono, Minnesota A-LONGL0204.00 Page 10 Native shrubs will also be planted in the nutigation site to provide additional cover and diversity (Appendix B, Sheet 2). Shrubs will be planted in a random pattern within the designated areas and will be a mixture of red osier dogwood (Comits siolonifera), elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), and several willow species {SalLx exigua, 5. bebbiana, S. amygdaloides. and S. discolor). Nannyberry {Viburnum lentago) may also be used to increase diversity if available. Willow species should be concentrated around the existing drainage ditch to provide maximum erosion control. Cuttings from the various willow species and red osier dogwood should be used in and around the banks of the drainage ditch to provide a cost-effective method of revegetating the exposed banks. Cutting should be collected from native stock and kept moist until they are planted. The few red osier dogwood on site may be salvaged and transplanted or used for cuttings. If they are transplanted, care should be taken that buckthorn is not incidentally transplanted as well. Container plants should be used throughout the remainder of the site. Erosion Control Appropriate erosion control procedures will be used for the construction of the mitigation site and the storm water treatment pond. These methods are shown in Appendix A, Appendix B Sheet 3, and detailed in Appendix G. Silt fencing will surround the entire project site and the existing drainage ditch. Silt fencing '-ill also be placed in the ditch to collect any additional material that may enter. Construction wilt also be timed so that no activity will be done if the site is inundated or flooding. Wood fiber blanket w ill be placed in the mitigation area where water may be flowing into or out of the site. These areas will also be planted with dense willow shrubs to provide rapid soil stabilization. Summary of Wetland Replacement The impacts from the creation of a new fire station will require the creation of 17,180 feet^ (0.39 acres) of wetland as a combination of new wetland or permanent upland buffer. The construction of the mitigation site, upland buffer, and storm water treatment pond will create 15,033 feet* of New Wetland Credit (NWC) and 14,584 feet^ of Public Value Credit. These credits are summarized in Table 1. Public Value Credit is composed of 12,605 feet* for upland buffer and 1,979 feet“ for the storm water pond (The normal pool area of the storm water pond is 2,638 feet^ of which 75% can be claimed for credit). The City of Orono has an approved storm water management plan, which is a requirement to allow PVC credits from storm water ponds to be allowed. Under the WCA, replacement of wetland impacts can be done as a combination of NWC and PVC. We propose to use 8,590 fect^ of the new wetland and 8,590 feet^ of the upland buffer area to Minnehaha Creak Watershed District Permit Application City of Orono, Minnesota A-LONOL0204.00 Pagan replace the impacted wetland at a ratio of 2;I- This will leave 6.443 feet* of NWC and 5.994 feel* of PVC beyond the required replacement. This additional area will be placed in a wetland bank under the ownership of the fire station for future use or sale. An application to deposit these credits into a new wetland bank has been included at the beginning of this document. Table 1 Created Basin ID Wetland Credits Credit Source New Wetland Credits Public Value Credits Wetland A Creation of Type %n Wetland 15.033 feet^0 Wetland A Creation of Buffer Area 0 12,605 feet ’ Storm Water Pond Creation Storm Water Treatment Basin 0 1.979 feet ’ (75% of normal pool area of 2,638 feet ’) Sum of Credits 15,033 feet’14,564 feet’ Monitoring Plan The Cities of Orono and Long Lake will be responsible for the required monitoring of the mitigation site. Staff from Short Elliott Hendrickson will assist with the monitoring and will be the authors of the required annual reports. Monitoring of the replacement area will be conducted for a minimum five-year period to evaluate the success of the mitigation area, identify maintenance and monitoring needs, and correct any identified problems. Hydrology will be monitored annually at least three times between early May and August. Shal ow monitoring wells will be installed in all created basins and ne.irby existing wetlands to monitor changes in hydrology over the monitoring period. Welland vegetation will be both qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated once per year during the period between July and \ugust. Photographs documenUng the changes in vegeiauon will also 'ic taken at this lime from fixed reference points. At the end of five years, or when the monitoring data suggests the replacement areas are successful, functioning wcilandi, a final Mnnthaha Crertc Walafshed DtoWet Pannit Application CKy of Orono, Minnesota A-LONOU02O4.0O Page 12 dclinealion will be conducicd to verify that the areas meet the three- parameter wetland criteria as set forth by the Coq>s of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987). A monitoring report will be prepared annually during the five-year monitoring period. The report will describe the status of the wetland replacement, summarize the results of the vegetative and hydrologic monitoring, and discuss management activities and corrective actions conducted during the previous year, as well as activities planned for the upcoming year. The report will be submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District by December 15 of each year. The annual reports will contain the following information; • In the first report only, a comparison of the as-built specifications with the design specifications and an explanation for significant modifications. • A brief description of the wetland mitigation areas, including location, size, vegetative and hydrologic monitoring reports, current wetland types, and desired wetland types. • For each subsequent year, a comparison of existing conditions in the wetlands with as-built specifications and an explanation for any significant differences. • A summary of water level measurements collected to date and a determination as to whether the hydrology in the wetland/s meets the design elevations and wetland hydrology criieria as defined in Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987). • A summary of plant species growing in the wetland and a determination whether the vegetation meets the wetland criteria as defined in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987). Plant species data will be provided from at least two sample locations for each v'etland. Percent dominance will be recorded at each sample location with emphasis placed upon species comprising greater than 10% of the spatial area. . A summary of management activities and/or corrective actions conducted in the wetlands during the previous year and activities planned for the following year (i.e., burning, mulching, retilling, regrading, herbicide application, mowing, or reseeding). • Color photographs of the wetland mitigation sites taken between July and August each year at the designated photo-reference points. Minnehaha Creek Wateiahed Diairtot Permit Applicaaon City of Orono, Mbineaota A-LONQL0204.00 Page 13 Vegetation Management Plan In conjunction with the annual monitoring, vegetation will be monitored for establishment and the presence of noxious or exotic species. The primary concern for this wetland is the establishment of common buckthorn. If buckthorn becomes problematic within the wetland or upland buffer it will be manually removed, or spot treated w ith glyphosphate if it is found in an isolated area. The treatment and removal of buckthorn on the property and the replacement of soils contaminated with buckthorn seeds will reduce the likelihood of buckthorn becoming established in the mitigation site. Successful revegetation of the site will also reduce buckthorn ’s competitive advantage over native species in disturbed areas. Reed canary grass is also known to be in the area and will more than likely appear within the mitigation site. If reed canary grass becomes established and begins to dominate, appropriate control methods will be used to reduce its presence. The successful creation of the floodplain forest should reduce the likelihood of significant reed canary grass establishment. Other exotic species will be controlled appropriately if they are identified on the site. Trees, shrubs, and seeded areas that do not become established will be promptly replaced. Recommendations of vegetation maintenance and actions will be summarized in the annual monitoring report. Seeded areas will be mowed tw ice during the first year if weed species are present. The site may also be mowed in subsequent years. Because the site is 'noposed to develop into a scrub-shrub / floodplain forest, burning is not recommended as a management tool. Storm Water Treatment (Rule N) A summary of the information required by MCWD Rule N is provided in Appendix G. A storm water treatment pond is proposed on the eastern half of the property north of the drainage ditch. The pond will be outside of the required buffer area along the stream. The pond is designed as a treatment pond and will have standing water and wetland vegetation. The hydraulics of the pond have been calculated and are available in Appendix H. The design efficiencies for total suspended solids and phosphorus removal have also been calculated. The pond design will meet NURP Standards with a modeled removal rate of 93.39o for suspended solids and 65.1% for phosphorus. The efficiency calculations are available in Appendix I. Minnehaha Craak Waierahad District Parmit Appilealion City ol Orano, MInnasota A-LONOL0204.00 Paga14 rc'ink»ii iMidlAMm-i 1 Erosion Control (Rule B) and Flood Storage Capacity (RuleC) The erosion control plan and flood storage requirements are summarized in Appendix G. Plan sheets in Appendices A and B shown the required erosion control structures and BMPs that will be used during construction. Floodplain storage will be increased with this project through the creation of an adjacent wetland. Mnnehaha Creek Watershed Otetitot Permit AppHcatkm CityofOrono.Minnesola A-LONQL0204.00 Page i5 Fdvuary 14,2002 F'l The Planning Conunisskm CiiyofOraoo 2750 Kdl^ Parkway For February 19* Meeting Hoarding Application W)2-27S5, Located at 340 MIlow Drive (site of new Long Lake Fire Station) 1. A vaiiance for the SO foot road setback. 2. Conditional Use Pennit fer hose tower, greater than 30 feet in height We would expect the new fire station to look at least as good as the Orono Munidpai Building or the Long Lake Sewer Station. The proposed station does not and will only look worse with a tower. (\»sibly with a nice looking nx^ I would have no objection to something some what higher. Right now it will look like a gun tower and guard station. There has been plenty of time to make decisions to allow for the SO fixM minimum set back. F.iihcr leave the set back, move the building or don't take the alternate for the sixth bay. The more garage doors you have the more commercial it looks. The building is a proposed 29 fixt and already too high without the tower. The least uc could expect after gening a very average looking commercial building in a RESIDENTIAL ndghborfaood. that it st^ within reasonable residential regulations. Sincerely, Ron Miller 270 N, Willow Drive (952)473-1265 Enclosed are pictures of ordinary commercial fire stations and some NICE looking neighborhood fire stations. Also enclosed is a previous lener and pictures soit to the Orono Council. M» '.'■i •••:’ Commercial looking I’i re StaHons. The only way ^o make rhem look v;orse is f'o make it- lijqher (which Hie new Long Lake Fire St-ation is and wh i ch to do. IJl't- .J.LKIWII lO ^ _______ 1 add a hose towt'r I ch they are tryin.y s i.- ■■ .. ■ > iki 1 ^1 • : ' • -T ; ^ ipP ?■’g.’!j t. , lejauao A*ujouv«I omuuiw M31CH eiOiCLO'S "SiOi 1-ui UO paiei^ »• p»tn «q Atiu pot wp.iMou, Aoj »o oue .m> «■ noA u.A,fl .a«m . uo„«u.,oiu. *M1 *.!<’* 1 ' ‘1 f. I • i • j:.t VIr f: ; t .1 t I . . 1 'mk : .''v% ■"' • *• t'ii• ."4 >' L' ■; -. • Ji <a=ESS^ i'SM-s i,iiii ^ w l-'rl 'Vt rv \ ^/1L 1' ^ t • • .J \:,J fj ] These tirsi 2 paj^es show b photos of fire stations west of Orono on Hiuliwav ^\2 What do they all hav in common ’ They are unattractive buildinci located in commc'cial areas with an excess amount of carafe doors Garage doors are the least desirable feature of commercial buildings Land has already been purchased at 340 Willow Drive It has been proposed, that a 12 (low class) garage door fire station be put in at this location After looking at these photos you might cv>ine to the conclusion that there IS onlv one wav that • • these fire stations could look even less attractive, by having 12 garage doors M mmm QRQHQSE13 LQG\310:^ - fnc station • Lonu Lake municipal buildings At first glance you niiultt think this is a junk yard, but it's not Junk yards have a 8 foot privacy fence around them, so no one can ■..•e the scrap tliat lias been discard ?d These are photos of an auto insurance recvciinu lot This would be the ideal location for the fire station It's a piece of very under used propeily Because response time IS an issue, this location IS only 16 seconds away from the .Mu Willow location, and is in a commeicia! area wliere a commercial buildme belongs .‘.JV. . .. - /•r P- \ Kcmoni'ci. tlicic is iu» ..tiiaiKc ncoJcd lo pul •i|* a w \ unaiiiaciiN^. n’ur.iui'al ^omincKial ‘'(iitJmji i\\ A nc\^l^ /iH*cd. Iii^hci don^i’A u•^lvic:’...a! aic*i (I • y <T4i < iAim M \ ' V \ v'2 w ■"• I •r ( . r 1 HP 1 ^^P t* 1 - *1' lillaiL-1II "NF.IGIinORHOOD” fciKlLliLT^mO’S This IS vvhai a "neighborhood” lire station should look like The "neighborhood" fire station typically has 2 uaraue doors and is as small and aitractise as possible Almost without exception. the "neighborhood" fre station stands alone, is on the fringe of a residential area or is in a comi; ercial area mw , Ml( 0*0.)N *>' ' y \ I ¥ Application 0 PZ^2T7SS' Date Received Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION _ _ ^ , Site address______S ^ ^ f Property Identification Number f PID> ^ 0 * 2> 3 ^ Please check one - Property____abstract or_____torrens? Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT ^ Name UlU>9^ Address &e>x faL»_____ City Phone (home) Zip g^2-y hone (work yir2-2-V9‘ V ® OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Address City__Zip Phone (home) Phone (work) (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size / o, Present use (check) Present Zoning District / 6 Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units__(_ Other (specify)_________ PROPOSAL _______ Division for Tax Purposes _______ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) yC Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites / / Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) Units per Acres Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land Residential ^ y Other (specify)*S[yATlcM3 I til --.rm MINIMUM MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION I. Payment of fees (refer to "application fees" listed below. yi. Completed application form. Preliminaiy plat information on Certificate of Survey. v/A. Certified Ptoperty Owners List of owners within 3S0' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). S. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Zoning Officiars Signature ____________________________________ Date __________________________ MINIMUM MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE FINAL APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (refer to Preliminaiy Subdivision Approval resolution and park fees if appicable). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Zoning Oflicial's Signature ____________________________________ Date___________________________ I. APPLICATION FEES (Zoning Administrator to check [X] those which apply) A. Application Base Fees: _____ Sketch Plan Review (Class I. II & III) S275.00 _____Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement S3 50.00 Subdivision Application (Class i & II) $350.00 Totals \y Preliminary Subdivision Application S400.00 S30.00/Iot (Class III & all non-residential) _____ Final Plat Application (Class III) S225.00 _____ Legal Review and Filing: _____Subdivision only St00.00 _____Subdivision w/easements and covenants min. S200.00 _____ Park Fees (to be determined per Section 11.62) _____ Legal and Engineering Review Fees (as incurred) _____ Renewal of Class I and II Subdivision Application S200.00 (No change from original application) _____ Renewal of Class III, Preliminaiy Subdivision Application S200.00 (No change from original application) _____ Renewal of Final Class III Subdivision Application SI 50.00 (No change from original application) B. Special Improvement Fees: _____ Proposed Private Roads S650.00 + S.50/lineaI ft.;_____lin. ft. x .50 = S. Proposed Public Roads S950.00 > $.50/lineal ft.; lin. ft. x .50 S Request for City to Accept Existing Private Road S950.00 Proposed Sanitary Sewer Main Extension S275.00 + S25/stub Proposed Watermain Extension S275.00 -*• S25/stub \y Proposed Storm Sewer System (excluding culverts) S250.00 _____ On-Site System, Site Evaluation Review (applicable to rural subdivision applications) S60.00/per lot x _____new lots C. Flexible Application Fces/Misc. Fees _____ Variance S250.00 (S50.00 per each additional variance) _____ Easement Vacation Associated with Subdivision S 100.00 _____ PRD Application with Subdivision S35.00/Dwelling Unit The applicant hereby agrees to prov ide all informatioiH^uired or requested by the Zoning Administrator, Cit>^ Engineer. City Attorney. Planning Commission and Council necesidiry ll)is application and further agrees to pav all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature Date Date ^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City Office 25 days before the Planning Commission meeting. Planning Commission meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. AnflkMm* Date Rccch ’cd Amount Paid OX-T?^ CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) lOPERTY INFORMATION . Site Address 3*tO LAjOUS AJ* Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. .CQuiie dDate Propitfp I (doW^ not^so own the adjacent parcels of land. Presem lue^gfproperty: residential ___pother (specify) t: __________; .(month/year) Zoning District: APPLICANT Name AddressTPQ AOL £0 _______ Phone (home) Phone (work ) Citv:^#Y£mc^ iS4rV OWNER (if different than applicant) Name __________ Phone (home)_ Phone (work) Address:City:.Zip: Estimated Construction Cost $DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST ________________ Describe request in detail: Sfhs (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ___Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) IIARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:. (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the applkation deadline date in order for yonr application to be conaidwed complete: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. / Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Go\l Center, 348-5910). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/i" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (I) copy 8'/j" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include naine(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your varianeg application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant e.xpenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true^and correct to-theJ^§r of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, con.sultatife agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes q^nvestigati^an^^i^cation of this request. Owner's Signature Date >^//^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planiung Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. I'- ■>r c;*2 AppHoition # Date Received 2.^/ > Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Nw A I Site Address j/iAJiQ., ^ Type of Application to he Filed Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)____________________________ APPLICANT Name Address I rss Pe> en OfT Phone (home) _______ Phone (work) yf- V 6C>0 OWNER (if different than applicant) Name_______^______ City ^i»ygr^ Qjk^t Zip Phone (home)_ Phone (work)_ Address City Zip. Date Pro l(do) f2^ 7^-00cquired _ Iso own the adjacent parcels of land. (month'year) FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - _____S 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application _____$175.00 Residential Accessory Use $250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $200.00 Duple.x Credit/Bldg $325.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $250.00 Land Alteration ____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain ____ Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more ____ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS _____$275.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____$300.00 Vacation _____$200.00 Easement Vacation _____$100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _____$350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _____$375.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. 2. 3. Completed Application Form. 4. 5. 6. Describe request in detail. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center, 348-3271), Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey information. ^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. 7. 8. 9. ^ Topographic survey (e.xisting and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). Consfniction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). ___As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY FOR REPRODUCTION (IT* X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Ov\Tier must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the abo\e infor nation has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:.____________ Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this-wplication, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correc^o the best of his^er^owledge. Applicant's signature Dale r ^ ^ OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consuU^its. agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigati^ and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date A/A/m y Applicant must have an submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting, Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place aiid advise the Building 8l Zoning OfTice of this change prior to the meeting. ff r I >r I rVt'jVf 1 Dcil'hU i:rr|:-'f!: tv/ F- r 'r! a j;41 :V i \ 1 t-» ■ ; 1 1 ^ '4'4; *^4. i n u MN -• .:; JLii,r, :r;. : > —5 <to m-, • ■••r ■ .“if.''.'V • ■ ••if ft A ^ ' I ir' '>i\-. p oufofT .If4l - •P.^- tj iiv:. 15 f. Y ' ^I kK .iv^r ■'5 a<» \ r?:^ rL Ji'^i 1/ "• ;.T ? . ' •-l‘ - * ^-^j \ : : 'V-a^L ^- r.k-.-:- V . ■ - V ' ??r *. * iU-iilA..: V: v'L*, vu-• - i..a/e* :li / .'.ja.Tirv 'r. '• r -T'-rifi t * -r-r*^ f 1 E • cri5:‘-.^f ■':r'rr“?'“^'■" " 7'•■'V>"v"'Krj>U;._ ^v .sraik^fi4i F V*J j ' . AVr^rrv ELM LA ”w s .*»• /•'I? 1 ; J2 »,s ” s ■ ir-s^:^ BlU.fA.fSf eS7ATViS * « • al - * { ■ ^: f ••:s •i«M r .jj'T . s a <f GF<AND tf$tt I '•i •• •• i i«£A«K4.VG(iMf%f 44 • I M * -< ‘.* k'^ x'.^. j Em ■ i 0:., ;■- jQ* -'• jiiji _'•* I. • M i I 4'' B>'- 2« r> ^ •uj <v . ^ i* " (/)•,iSl •« I ’ ..< M I 4 * - <rr v «*k_ s*/^ — /^a'i j, ■iliMglilWIlillBl :'i •■ • V 02-27rr •1 • 1 • I »f . , < U l.» I .*/ i;:« . . ♦ . s» »*•! ' <1 ■«.»'•> ■ . . RUN DATE il/08/Ri BATCH 5B2 NENNEfXN COUNTY PROPCRTY XNFORNATXON 'SVSTEN PROPERTY ONNERS LIST REPORT no: PXASMII PAOE . I sa SS-118-2S SI ••!• PROP ADDR 888S8 AOORMS UNASSIONEO OMNER NANE nONWCO TAXPAYER *i N 8 SANTA PE RR CO NANE/AODR property TAX DEPT ' PO 80X 981889 PORT NORTN TX 78181 38 33-118-23 32 8882 88838 ADDRESS UNASSX6I BURLXNBTON NORTHERN XNC 8 N 8 SANTA PE RR CO PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 981889 PORT NORTH TX 78181 » 38 33-118-23 41 8883 88225 NXUON. DR N JANES D DXIXNAN JANES D DXIXNAN ^ 225 NXUON DR HO L0N8 LAKE NN 55358 PROP ADDR . ONI«R NANE..^ TAXPAYER • NANE/AIDOR ew miMK TAXPAVCi v\ NAM/ABM • ^• * t • • • » . , PM» AOM PNNtR NAIC TAXPAYEf NANE/AWA M SS-1M-2S. 41 AtM •24«'t IIOOONAVEN M .HILTON N »X)I, V\ NlLtm H OIX , ■' ^ '24«0: WOOONAVIN im . . 'LONO LAXE hN . SSSM • • • ’ » 'V 38 ''sS-118-23 41 8812 88385 miXOM OR N DE0R8E t OSOOOD ETAL 6E0R6E L OSOOOD ; 385^ NXUON OR N ; > LONO* LAKE NH " 55358 » ; I. .J.. . V • • I A* .38 34-118-23 32 8883 88348 NXUbN DR N .CITY OP OROND • CITY OP ORONO .P 0 BOX 88 CRYSTAL BAY NN 55323 •' . ... M S4-U0-2S ss am ntOf ABN lom 6LENBALE pR . OMNER NAME. RRENVTERV OF MFCS- XNC • ■ ‘ TAXf AVER ■ CALVIN FRENV CHURCH NANE/AON .. ‘ORAND;AVE I OLENOAU » >- \ •LONO LAKE NN.‘ 55358 .t •■ ■■ . . •• . ■ > • • ’• , iV" • ' • ’ 7R ^'M'UR'ES’sR'RmV' • ••••• •." PROF ABOR . M^Rl OlENBALE N t '.'',.,. OMNER NANE CALVIN FREM CHURCH-OF ORONO .■ TANFAVER CALVIN FRENV CHURCH NAME/ANR. NANO AVE' R OLENBALE LONO LAKE NN SSSAS * ■ ^4 •/. ■ / .* • »•; • • 38 33-118-23 41 8818 82445 NOODHAVEN DR JAP HARRIS .. . JOHN T 5 PATRXCXA'L HARRIS* ^ 2445 NOODHAVEN OR . LONO LAKE NN 55358 - . 38 33-118-23 41 8815 08838 ADDRESS IHASSXOHED G N A S L OROHBERO^ GLENN, N A SANDRA L ORONBERO 325 N NXLLON DR LONO LAKE NN 55358 38 34-118-23 32 8884 88288 NXLLOH DR N RONALD E NXLLER RONALD E NULER 278 N NXLLOH DRIVE LCXiO LAKE NN 55358 • V . 38 34-118-23 33 8854 08198 HXLLOH DR N KEHN A HXLLXANSON ET AL KEITH A HXLLXANSON * 198 N HXLLOH DR. - LONG LAKE NN 55358 ' ) • • ’ o 72 S4-110*2S 32 •••• ••231 HARRIHBTON OR H C; FESCNEL ET Ai HXtHAEL- C FESCNEL 3S4 HARRXNOTON OR LONO LAKE NN SS3S4 i..' V •“A . . J-* y- 30 3S-110>23 41 Mil •••S» AOORESS UNASSIONEO. NOOONAVEN NOMEOHNERS ASSN MOOOHAVEN NOMEOMNERS ASSN C/O LINDA HUTCNXNS . 2SS« MOOBNAWt OR ' LONO LAKE Ml . SSSM' ‘ I SS S4-11B-2S 32 •••2 ' •••SO AOORESS IOIASWO» E N HILLER ETAL EOMARO N NXLLER. 'N XIO* NAVZATA BLVO ‘ .LONO LAKE NN SSSSi ' • ' » . • • ' = % f . SO S4-11S-2S 32 •••s' •••SS AOORESS UNASSIONEO NN L HURSH LVOU NURSN 744 HILLTOP CT • MOUNT DORA FL S27S7 . 72 S4-11S-2S 31 ••77 •••72 AOORESS UNASSXOSB •URLINOTON NORTHERN XNC • NS SANTA FE RR CO ^FROFERTV TAK DEFT • FO iOK M1M4 . .. FORT NORTH TX 741SI y .vv . *> , •.* . 'V. ... , 72 S4>11S>2S 32 ••II ■ ••232 OLENDALR DR , A J • 0 AHLSTROM- ARVXO J AHLSTROM 232 OLENBALE OR LONO LAKE HN SSSS« . f * • •* .*• • t I / . V • • •. .. *:/ • /• 8. \ 02.-2.7SS .3 I f .*• .• V ' ’ * • • *• '* * *•' 4 • % r •*- ♦ , * 0 • • •« *. ■► • # 8 • •* •# 1 ,' • • « • •. •* •0 •% •. • *• • *8 • • 1 •• ► ‘-• • RUN DATE 11/iS/Al^ lATCN SI2 NElWfXN COUNTY fROPERTY XfiEMIfUTIQN SYSTENT ;/ 72 ' M-llR-25 32 RIIA f t2Al NARRZHOTON DR CNRJSTOPNEII J KZESER CNRISTOfUCR J KZESER NAHE/ADim 2A1*NARRZN6T0N DR V. lONO EAKC TM 5S3SA PROP mm OUNCR NANC TAXPAYER i. PROP ADDR 72 ' S4*na-2S 32 OtlY. ff27E HARRZfiOTpN CZR’ ONNER NAHE R N DEAH A. J L BEAN TAXPAYER ^ * > HANC/AOD|r KRISTOPHER B JENNZPER BEAN; ZTB^NARRZNBTON CZR. / LCM. LAKE m * SSS54 .•f’ « • •' A. • '1' t •f • • PROP ADDR ONNER NANi TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 72 .34-11R-2S 32 M22 0E307 NARRZNOTON DR STATE OP HN HN DEPT OP* TRANSPORATZON DZR-RZBNT OP NAY OPERATZONS ST PAUL HN 551SS ; , I* f *PROP ADDR ONNER HANK TAXPAXRR NAHE/ADOR 72 . S4-liB«23 32 M25 . 00341 NARRZNOTON DR STATE OP HN • ' m DEPT OP TRANSPORATZON DZR-RIONT OP NAY OPERATZONS ST I^AUL HN SSlBS ' *• • 72 .34-110*23 32 0020 OOSM. ' NARRZNOTON DRPROP ADDR ONNER NANE . STATE OP INN >•r f ^ TAXPAYER V HN DEpT OP :tRANSI^TZON . t * >. NANE/ADDR DZE-RZONTOP NAY'OPERAHONS ‘ ST PAUL HN 55130 , ^.• • *1 *. V . i. • . V. * ** •72>‘S4-Ili^as •• ■ HMWINBTMrM ^ ■, OWiRyNAMf . P/A- 08UHD.<4IA'liUt{.LIR • ‘'' TAXPAVCIt^ NAt«/AOO* •peRoy ooland/Wxll^ .nl*eller ^ 270 NARRZNOTON DR PO BOX 3 r LONO. LAKE HN I^SSA • * ■ •t * « PROPERTY ONNERS LIST 72 34-110-23 32 0017 00233 NARRZNOTON CZR JOHN T tfZOZNO JOHN T NZDZNO 233 NARRZNOTON CZRCLE LONO LAKE HN 33330 72 S4-11B-23 32’ 0020 002B3 NARRZNOTON CZR. B B J DROEN BRZAN N' DROEN 203 HARRZNGTON CZR LONO LAKE HN 33350 ^ ' 72 S4-11B-2S 32 0023 00319 NARRZNOfON DR STATE OP* NZNN HN DEPT OP TRANSPORTATION . DZR-RZOHT OP NAY OPERATZONS ST PAUL HN .33133 .* • 72 34-110-23 32 0020 00331 .NARRZNOTON dr' t . STATE OP HN HN DEPT OP TRANSPORATZON DZR- RZONT OF NAY OPERATIONS ST PAUL HN 33133 72 34-110-23 32 0030 . 00322 ^MRRZNOTON DR VZL QP LONO LAKE • CITY OP LONO LAKE PO kOX L' • 1904 PARK AVE^- LONO'LAKE HN 33330 *11 72' '.M'-Ut*2S si'iHSS . REPORT NO; PZ4S3401 PAOC 0 72 34-118-23 32 OOIB 00203 NARRZNOTON CZR DAVZO J REZD DAVZD J REZD 203 HARRINGTON CZR LCRIO LAKE HN 33330 i 72 34-110-23 32 *O021 00297 NARRZNOTON CZR *L S 8 N L GUSTAFSON >LZNDA S 8 NAVNE L.OUSTAPSON 297'NARRZNOtqN CZR LONG LAKE HN '33330 ' ' . ;• A*. * * V 72 34-118-2? 32 0024-^- 00321 NARRZNOTON DR STATE OP HN HN DEPT OP/TRANSPORATZON . • \^DZR-RZGHT OP NAY OPERATZONS V. ST PAUL HN 33133 72 34-118-23 32 0027 * 00334 HARRZNOTON DR STATE OP HN HN DEPT OP TRANSPORTATION’ DZR-RZOHT OP NAY OPERATZONS ST PAUL HN 33U3 72 34-118-23,32 0033 00288 NARRZNOTON DR * VZL OF LONO LAKE*. .. > CZTY OF LONO LAKE * . PO BOX L - 1904 PARKUVE LONO LAKE NN 33330 • * s . "i. . . . 00200 /'ViURtZNBTQM DR ZCKNEY0 N irrzcKNEv o.j om GEORGE N STZOCNRY:^ ' .i . JOAN OLZVERZUS STZCKNEY’ * * ‘ V * 2590 COUNTRYSIDE DR LONO LAKE HN 33330 • ‘7? '•'84-Uf-2i’>2''’llW ' '•M72 AB0MSS.n V ituRUNeroiy imfri • N I SANTA Plim.CO-; { ■PMPtRTV TAX'NPT- •fO MM 9MM* 'FORT WOtTM TX . 7«Ul *• .1 02 -a? ■N* . > \• • ^ i • O’ ■ ■J- ■\.0: 3 V- O ■ *_L4;wO f.. .• o ,•• 3 ^ 3 O *' i8• ..••• . ■V‘.•V-' . » •••••> V • . .'5; ♦ V • r *■S ■ . : It . •* • ■ * 3 • . 4 • • •• .• • •« • . . o T- - FEB 2 5 2002 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Febniaiy 25,2002 ITEM NO.: /7 Department Approval: Nmc Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Public Services Director's Reportr» Item Description: Accept Donation of a Shed from Ricks’ Super Value Store The City recently received a donated shed from Rick’s Super Value Store in Navarre. This shed was used for storage of bags of water softener salt at the store. They have built a new shed for this purpose. Park Commissioner, Rick Meyers, coordinated the donation of this shed. It is wooden storage shed 1 S' wide by 8' deep and 8' high. The shed is currently being stored at the Navarre water plant site. The use of this shed has not been decided yet. The Park Commission is interested in the future possibility of using this shed for a small skating rink warming house. The shed could also be used for storage purposes at the City Public Works facility. Council approval is required for the acceptance of donations to the City. Staff is recommending approval of this donation of a shed from Rick’s Super Value Store. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to accept donation of a shed to the City of Orono from Rick’s Super Value Store. FEB 2 5 2002 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION UM urUHONO DATE: Febniaiy 25.2002 ITEM NO.: t5 Department Approval: Nanie GregGqipa TMc Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Public Services Directors Report Item Description: Bid Award • Eqtiipment & Matenals Bid 2002 The City of Orono advertised for two successive weeks for street materials and equipment rental, with the bid opening at 1:00 P.M. Friday, Februaiy IS, 2002. The enclosed tabulation contains a complete accounting of all bids. The accepted low bids for materials are determined by availability and location of materials. Traveling distance to a supplier is considered a cost factor when determining a low bid. When renting equipment with an operator, we are guided by the type, size of equipment, and an hourly rate. It is possible to award the low bid to more than one contractor when considering materials and equipment. In order to stimulate enthusiasm for the following year’s work, we make sure to divide the woik accordingly among these low bidders. In the event the low bidder is not available, the City reserves the right to purchase from the next alternate. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the bids as presented for the calendar year 2002. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the year 2002 Materials and Equipment Bids. tin inmiMi—lUi rii rtifiliirrn-ritiirtfcitrii rtufiMmruti'i'ii TO:Greg Gappa, Public Services Director FROM: Jack Brinkhaus, Public Works Sqiervisor DATE:February 25.2002 SUBJECT: Bid Award • Equipment Materials Bid 2002 The City of Orono advertised for two successive weeks for street materials and equipment rental, with bid opening at 1:00 P.M., Friday, February IS, 2002. The enclosed tabulation contains a complete accounting of all bids. The accepted low bids for materials are determined by availability and location of materials. Traveling distance to a supplier is considered a cost factor when determining a low bid. When renting equipment with an operator, we are guided by the type, size of equipment, and an hourly rate. It is possible to award the low bid to more than one contractor when considering materials and equipment. In order to stimulate enthusiasm for the following year's work, we make sure to divide the work accordingly among these low bidders. In the event the low bidder is not available, the City reserves the right to purchase from the next alternate. I recommend that the City Council accept the bids as presented for the calendar year 2002. ,w W.' CITY OF ORONO 2002 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTIl lES ARE BID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE ITEM #L #1A, #2 &ffl CLASS 5 GRAVHL TON PIT DEL. #IA CLASS 5 GRAVEL TON RECYCLED PIT DEL. #2 FA-2 CLASS C (SEAL COAT) TON PIT DEL. «3 FA-1 (WINTER SAND) TON PIT DEL. Allied Blacktop *8.00 *11.30 Barton Sand & Gravel Co.7.03 10.49 7.03 10.49 *7.03 10.49 Buffalo Bituminous *4.50 *8.25 7.25 11.00 Midwest Asphalt Corp.*5.59 *9.05 SA-AG Inc.*6.49 Denotes low bid 1 CITY OF ORONO 2002 BID TABUI.ATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE DID IN TONS • EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE ITEM #4 1 1/2" CI.KAN CRUSHED LIMESTONE TON 1 1/2" MINUS CRUSHED LIMESTONE TON 3/4" CLEAN CRUSHED LIMESTONE TON 3/4" MINUS CRUSHED LIMESTONE TON PIT DEL.PIT IIKI..PIT DEL.PIT DEL. Barton Sand & Gravel 26.84 30..10 22.95 26.41 Bryan Rock Products •9.80 •I4J3 •6J4 *10.87 *9.80 *I4J3 *6J4 •I0JI7 ITEM US, USA, U6 45 MC 30,70,250,800 GALLON PLANT DEL. & PLAC'ED 45A CRS - 1 & 2 c ;allon PLANT DEL. & PLACED 46 RC250^ GALLON PLANT DEL. & PLACED Allied Blacktop 2.50 *3.00 Buffalo Bituminous *2.00 Midwest Asphalt 5.33 Denotes low bid CITY OF ORONO 2002 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTI1 IKS ARE BID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE 1 ITEM #7 & #7A m 2331 Type 31 AC Plain Mil #7 2331 Type 31 AC Plant Mil tn 2331 Type 31 AC Plant Mit M7A 2331 Type 31 MC Plant Mis #7A 2331 Type 31 MC Plant Mis #7A 2331 Type 31 MC Plant Mis Pl.ANT DELIVERED PLACED PLANT DELIVERED PLACED Buffalo Bituminous *24.00 *26.75 *29.60 Commercial Asphalt 28.03 1 Midwest Asphalt 26.63 29.82 31.50 1 1 ITEM & #8A 2331 Type 41 AC Plant Mis PLANT 2331 Type 41 AC Plant Mis DELIVERED «9 2331 Type 41 AC Plant Mis PLACED «8A 2331 Type 41 MC Plant Mis PLANT #8A 2331 Type 41 MC Plant Mis DELIVERED #8A 2331 Type 41 MC Plant Mis PLACED Buffalo Bituminous *24.00 *26.75 *30.45 Commerciai Asphalt 28.03 Midwest Asphalt 26.63 29.82 32.15 1 * Dciiulcs low bid CITY OF ORONO 2002 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALI. QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE ITEM #8B, 88C, 88D t»8B MOD. FINK MIX 233tType4l AC/TON PLANT DEL. PLACED 88C' MOD. FINE MIX 2331 Type 41 MC/TON PLANT DEL. PLACED 88D MOD. FINE MIX SO-50 2331 Type 41 AC/MC/TON PLANT DEL. PLACED Buffalo Biluminous *25,00 *27.75 *31.50 Commercial Asphalt 29.21 Midwest Asphalt 27.16 30..15 34.00 ITEM 89,1110, #11 #9 FDLL DEPTH BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REC LAMATION PRICE/CUBIC YARD #10 SALVAGE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PRICE / CUBIC YARD #11 SUB-GRADE EXCAVATION PRICE / CUBIC YARD Buffalo Bituminous 4.50 *10.00 *8.50 Midwest Asphalt *1.45 17.00 25.00 DcHotes low bid CITY OF OKONO 2002 BID TABULATIONS FOR STKFRT MATKRIAI^ & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANT! I lES ARE BID IN IONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE ITEM #12 ALL PRICES TO BE. DKUVERED 12" CMP l6CAliC.K 15" CMP 16GADGK 18" CMP 16 GAUGE 24" CMP 14 GAUGE 24" CMP 16 GAUGE 36" CMP 14 GAUGE 48" CMP 12 GAUGE 60" CMP 10 GAUGE All Sled Products *8.00 *10.00 *12.00 *20.00 *16.00 *30.00 *55.00 *86.00 Johnston Foreo *8.00 *10.00 *12.00 *20.00 *16.00 *30.00 *55.00 *86.00 ITEM in 2a (Apron) ALL PRICES TO BE DELIVERED 12" APRON 15" APRON 18" APRON 24" APRON 36" APRON 48" APRON 60" APRON All Stcd Products *39.00 *49.00 *65.00 *96.00 *300.00 *700.00 *1200.00 Johnston Earco 40.00 50.00 *65.00 100.00 *300.00 *700.00 *1200.00 18" BAND ITEM# 12a (Band) ALL PRICES TO BE DELIVERED 12" BAND 15" BAND 24" BAND 36" BAND 48" BAND 60" BAND All Steel Products *10.00 *15.00 *18.00 *24.00 *45.00 *80.00 *129.00 Johnson Fargo 12.00 *15.00 *18.00 *24.00 *45.00 82.50 *129.00 * Denotes low bid CITY OF ORONO 2002 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE ITEM #13 TRUCK RENTAL TRUCK RENTAL TRUCK RENTAL TRUCK RENTAL PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR CY RATE CY RATE CY RATE CY RATE Allied Blacktop 10 55.00 18-22 *65.00 Sehoenine Excavatine 12 *45.00 * Denotes low bid "J I •v N , « • y ‘a . ,X *■> :7iA ' ^ f* ^ *,1 . ** rfii - • T «Ai^ •*• ♦-*«4rr% CITY OF ORONO 2002 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE ITEM #14 BACKHOE PER HOUR c:v RATE BACKHOE PER HOUR CY RATE BACKHOE PER HOUR CY RATE Schoenine Excavatine Vt *70.00 1 *90.00 ITEM #15 3/4 TON PICKUP W/8 PLOW PER HOUR Schoenine Excavatine $*45.00/Hr ITEM #16 WHEEL LOADER PER HOUR WHEEL LOADER PER HOUR WHEEL LOADER PER HOUR CY RATE CY RATE CY RATE Allied Blacktop 3 125.00 Schocning Excavating 3 *80.00 * Denotes low bid ■ J FEB 2 5 2002 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Ull '-»»• OMONO DATE: February 25,2002 ITEM NO.: ( Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Public Services Director's Report0 Item Description: Request for Final Payment, Navarre Park Improvement Project We have reviewed the information submitted by the City's engineering firm and recommend approval of this Request for Final Payment. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Request for Final Payment, Navarre Park Improvement Project to Koolmo Construction Inc. in the amount of $5,522.97 : /! .i. ^inni $• l/1lBonestfPO f ■Wntfiif Anderfl(& IlfAssodaia lngiwwi4ARMKn Owner Cilvof Orono PO Box660rono. MN. 953234)066 1 1 w ••• V,Date:'’November 29.2001 For Period:600000110 11/29/2001 Request No:3 AND FINAL Contractor Koolmo Construction 1334 • 146lh Lane NW. Andover. MN, 95304 CONTRACTOR'S REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NAVARRE PARK IMPROVEMENTS BRA FILE NO. 139-99-109 SUMMARY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Original Contract Amount Chang# Ordar - Addition Chang# Ord#r • Deduction Revised Contract Amount Value Compiotod to Date Material on Hand Amount Earned Less Retainage 0% Subtotal Less Amount Paid Previously Liquidated damages - AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 95.329 00 S $ 1.135 00 0.00 3 AND FINAL $, S. s. $ $ s s s s 96.464.00 96.209.50 000 96.209.50 000 96.209.50 90.666 53 000 5.522.97 Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLtK * ASSOCUTES. INC. Approved by Contractor KOOLMO CONSTRUCTION)I^O CONSTRUCTION . Approved by Owner CITY OF ORONO Specified Contract Completion Date: November 10. 2000 Date; 1 2 3 tat 1 • frotlofi CofHrol and SH» Oradino/Flnal8liaplng sat ftnca. ragular Proiaction of catch basin, noo-straal Sili grading/llnal shaping Total Part 1 • Erosion Control and Sila Grading/Final Shaping Contract Unit QuanWy Amount Unit Quanttly Prt^to Data toDato LF 190 9.00 so.oo EA 1 290.00 1 $250.00 LS 1 9000.00 1 $5,000.00 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 19 18 17 18 19 20 Part 2 • Park Improvtmants 4* HOPE draktlii wHh Ibbfic sock 8* HOPE draintSa with fabric sock 8* OlPoubat piping Oudatscraan Fialdstona rip rap (8*-18*) Conaato play araa curbing (8*xl8*) 9* conaata pavamant Synthatic rasiiam surfacing Orainaga aggragata (CV) Gaotaxtaa Fitar Racydad rubbar tias (3*x3*) Enginaarad wood llbar mulch (LV) Play structuras (complala) awvi^i lODmpirai Bilufninoua patfMsy Sodding, lawn type Saading (shady mix) Total Part 2 • Park Improvements Change Order Number l Parti Water service and yard hydrant as described in Total Part 1 Total Part i • Erosion Control and Site Grading/Finai Shaping Total Part 2 - Park Improvements Total Part 1 Total Work Completed To Date it* $5,250.00 LF 209 10.00 195 $1,950.00 LF 42 11.00 42 S462.00 LF 20 20.00 20 $400.00 LS 1 100.00 1 $100.00 CY 0.25 1000.00 025 $250.00 LF 278 39.00 $0.00 SY 291 7.00 280 $1,960.00 SY 275 20.00 320.25 $6,405.00 CY 95 19.00 95 $825.00 SY 540 1.00 540 $540.00 EA 10 69.00 10 $650.00 CY 220 25.00 220 $5,500.00 LS 1 1 $50,000.00 LS 1 1 $3,000.00 SY 230 31.50 2X $7,245.00 SY 300 3.00 300 $900.00 AC 0.5 200.00 0.5 $100.00 $80,267.00 Proposal Raquast No. 1 LS 1 6000.00 1 $6,000.00 2 Concrtta play area curbing (8*x18*) • Deduct from contract LF 278 -35.00 $0 00 3 Modified conaete play are curbing LF 278 17.50 267 $4,672.90 $10,872.50 $5,250.00 $80,287.00 $10,672.50 $96,209.50 J PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS OWNER CITY OF ORONO HREFI BRA FILE NO. 139-99-109 CONTRACTOR KOOLMO CONSTRUCTION CHANGE ORDERS 1 10/5/2000 This Change Order adds hydrant and modification of play area curb.SI.135.00 Total Changa Ordtra $1,135.00 PAYMENT SUMMARY 1 07/11/2000 06/19A)1 75.904.53 3.994.98 79.899.51 2 06/20/2001 06/19/01 14.782.00 4.772.98 95.459.51 3 AND FINAL 06/20/2001 11/29/01 5.522.97 96.209.50 Material on Hand Total Payment to Date $96,209.50 Ohoinal Contract $95,329.00 Reiainage Pay No. 3 AND FINAL Change Orders $1,135.00 Total Amount Earned $96.209 50 Revised Contract $96,464.00 rcB 2 5 2002 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 11 v^r QHONO DATE: February 25,2002 ITEM NO.: / 7 Department Approval: Nanc Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Adminbtrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Public Services Director’s Report Item Description: Regional Skate Park in the City of Mound -Resolution The City of Mound is in the process of developing a regional skateboarding and in-line skating park to meet the recreational needs of the western Lake Minnetonka area citizens. Mound is seeking the support of area cities in this effort to develop this skate park. The Park Commission discussed this issue at their February meeting and voted to encourage Orono citizens to support this project with financial and other contributions. At the last Council meeting, the Park Commission representative requested that the Council adopt a resolution supporting the concept of the development of a regional skate park in the City of Mound. The Council agreed to support the development of the skate park and encourage Orono citizens to provide financial and other contributions for this effort. We have provided a resolution of support for this skate park project, for Council consideration, and are recommending approval of this resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve resolution supporting the development of a regional skate park in the City of Mound A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF DEVELOPMENT OF A SKATE PARK IN THE CITY OF MOUND WHEREAS, the City of Mound currently operates a skateboarding and in-line skating park at the Pond Arena Facility in the City of Mound and this facility is heavily used by residents from several communities in the western Lake Minnetonka area, including many Orono residents. The City of Mound is in the process of developing a new skateboarding and in-line skating park to meet the recreational needs of the western Lake Minnetonka area citizens. WHEREAS, the western Lake Minnetonka area has numerous smaller cities with limited with financial resources to meet all of their recreational needs, and it is not cost effective for area cities to have duplicate recreational facilities. WHEREAS, the City of Orono is supportive of regional park and recreation facilities in meeting the western Lake Minnetonka area needs for cost effective and abundant recreational facilities. WHEREAS, the City of Orono has very generous citizens, who throughout the years have made many substantial contributions to the City’s park and recreation facilities The City has historically funded a very limited park and recreation program and relied on the generosit>’ of its citizens to privately develop and operate park and recreation facilities such as the Orono Ice Arena and Lee Carlson ball fields. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Orono City Council as follows: 1.The City Council hereby supports the concept of a regional skate park in the City of Mound to provide additional recreational opportunities for the citizens of the western Lake Minnetonka Area and encourages the citizens of Orono to support the development of this facility through financial and other contributions. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on February 25,2002. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor I i r REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION FEB 2 5 2002 Oi I V Ur UliCMVU DATE: Februaiy 22,2002 ITEM NO: /,f Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: #1 Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Park Fund Donations The City has received thiee donations to the Park Fund. These are as follows: Margaret Merkow - $10.00 Jay and Kendall Nygard - $50.00 BRA (Bonestroo) - $200.00 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to accept the donations listed above and to express the City’s appreciation and gratitude for the donations. ■mini rn lit ••'^ETINQ 2 5 2002 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION I \jr OHOHO DATE: l-ebruary 22,2002 ITEM NO: / 7 Department Approval: Name RonMoorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:0 Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Payment Request and Change Order No. I for Soil Correction Work - Long Lake Fire Station The Council, at its February 11 meeting, raised concerns regarding the change order portion of the payment request for Ingram Excavating. Due to these concerns, the Council continued action on the total payment request. On Friday, February 15. the City Administrator polled the Council Members to obtain authorization to release payment of the original contract amount. This authorization was granted. The specific item in the change order that was of concern to the Council was the $ 1,980.00 cost for digging holes for settlement plates, then refilling them when they could not be used. The Council did not believe the City should be responsible for this cost. The project manager has explained that the duplicate settlement plate work w as the result of good faith efforts to try to speed up the work rather than due to carelessness or improper work. The situation was that both the soils correction contractor and the soils engineer were trying to keep the work moving as quickly as possible. They found that the PVC pipes in the settlement plates were breaking because the soil was frozen. They had to get new settlement plates with steel pipe versus PVC pipe. The soils engineer indicated they would do their best to get the settlement plates by the next day. Early the next day, Ingram dug the holes for the settlement plate poles but GME was unable to provide the settlement plates that day. The holes had to be filled in to prevent the soil from freezing. This duplicate work was caused by elTorts to keep the project moving rather than by carelessness. The project manager believes both the soils correction contractor and the soils engineer performed extremely well under dilTicult conditions to get the project completed as quickly as possible. I Ic is recommending that the City pay the duplicate costs rather than penalizing either the soils correction contractor or the soils engineer for their good faith efforts to keep the project moving. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Motion to approve Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $7,619.00. Motion to approve the Application and Certificate for Payment to Ingram Excavating, Inc. in the amount of $225,500.00. 1 J 10901 Rtd Drclt Orivt. Suita 200. Minnatotika. MN 55343-9301 952.912J000 95^ui2.2601 FAX archittctuT€ • tnginnring ■ • tnvirtnmtntal * transportation January 31,2002 RE:Long Lake and Orono, Minnesota Long Lake Fire Station Soils Correction Project, Bid Package No. I SEH No. A-BKVGR0201 .00 14.00 City of Long Lake Michelle Morse 1964 Park Avenue Long Lake, MN 55356 Dear Ms. Morse: Enclosed is Application for Payment No. I (final) for the soils correction project completed by Ingram Excavating, Inc. In preparation for submittal of this Application for Payment, several meetings were held with the contractor to determine the appropriate final payment. Attached to the Application for Payment is Change Order No. I which documents some e.xtra costs which were incurred during the course of the project. By way of explanation, if you refer to Item No. 4 in Change (jrder No. 1 this item documents the additional silt fence necessary to satisfy concerned parties during construction. The price for the additional silt fence is at the unit price in the original bid. Item No. 3 m Change Order No. 1 is for covering the surcharge with mulch until such time as the surcharge can be removed and the project completed. This was added to the project at a negotiated price with the contractor. The second item on the Change Order is for additional work associated with the contractor setting settlement plates on top of the sand building pad prior to placement of the surcharge. The settlement plates are necessary to monitor the rate of settlement of the sand so that the soil consultant, GME, can recommend when the building can be constructed on the pad. The pad is anticipated to be ready for build‘ng construction according to the current schedule for the project. Due to the cold weather, the settlement plates had to be redesigned by GME before they could be installed by the contractor, hence the additional cost. Finally, Item No. I on Change Order No. 1 documents the value of some extra select granular borrow’ left on the site. In the process of constructing the sand backfill for the building pad, sand backfill would occasionally fieeze such that the top portion of the sand backfill needed to be removed prior to placement of additional unfrozen material. The accumulated stock pile ot sand will have value to the building contractor because the sand could be used as subbase for the entrance drive and parking areas. Ingram Excavating believes that there is much more than 500 cubic yards of select granular borrow left on site, but as a concession to the uncertainty as to the exact volume, the amount of excess select granular borrow left on site has been reduced to 500 cubic yards, wbch Ingram is guaranteeing will be available. ITie unit price for the select granular borrow has also been reduced. Short Biott Htndifcksoa Inc.YaurTntUMRHOuict Bwal Opportimlly Enfiployw i City of Long Lake Januaiy 31,2002 Page 2.. The remainder of the project went pretty much as planned. The foregoing cost issues have been thoroughly reviewed by Ron Kirk, Program Mam^er who concurs with approval of Change Order No. 1 and final payment for the work in the amount of $225,500. We recommend approval of Change Order No. I in the amount of $7,619. We further recommend approval of Application for Payment No. 1 (final) in the amount of $225,500. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Darnel R. Boxrud, P^.^ City Engineer ka Enclosures c: Ron Moorse, City of Orono (with enclosure) Ron Kirk (with enclosure) Ingram Excavating, Inc. (vnth enclosure) k^vilVaianMv hr doc --. tc APFLICAiUN AUL^ JUoTii'iCA‘1 i£ i*Oft PAYlViENV coNsiMucuouMANAGDi-AuvistH numoN AIA l)OCUMEN*r G702/CM;! (InMrucilonx (HI rcwiM* 5lilc)l>MiK ONK or IWillS 1U OWNliU:Pttojiirri-Long Lake Fire Station Orono, Minnesota City of Long Lake 1964 Park Avenue Long Lake, HN Ingraa Excavating Inc. 18900 Pioneer Trail Eden Prairie, MN 55347 via CONSTHUCTION managIsH: c:oNTKA(n* lOK; Package # I via AKcmiRcr: APIM.ICAI ION NO.: 1 PRKIOI) IX): PROJUCI l••|^OM CONI HACrOR:CONTRACr DAI F.: DUiribulUm lo: □ OWNER □ CONJTIRIKHION MANAGER □ ARCIIITP.Cr □ CONI RACTOR S.E.H. CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT AppJiciiioii L^ in;uJc for payincnf. as shown IkIow, In connection with ihc ConinKi Continuation Sheet, AIA Document Ci703, i.s aiiachecl. I. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM..................................i 217,881.00__________ 1 Tic undersigned ('oniractor certifies that to tlie licsi of tlic Contractor's knowledge. Infor- Illation and iielief tiie Wirk covered hy this Application for l\iynicni has lKX*n completed In accordance with the Contract Documcni.s. that all amounts have l>ccn paid hy the Contractor for \Xtork for which previous Certificates for Payment were Ivsued and pay- 2. ftel Change By Change Orders ..........................i 7i619>00 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line I i 2)..............I 225,500.00 4. TOTAL COMPLETED A STORED TO DATE..........t 225,500.00 ments rci;cU)tfMlJroni the C)wner, and that current payment shown herein Ls now due. RACrOtlTCONfRACloli: Ingra^ ExcavaClng Inc. 4^i-ni n„c: 1/30/2002 Todd A. Ingro Minnesota Vice President (Oilumn (• <m (•702) S. RETAINAGE: jqb lOOZ complete ;<• __y__% of Completed VRifk I.-0- Cuumy of: Hennepin n o. January ^0^^ . 1 Sub.scrilKd and sworn to iKforc me thus day of (Cfiliiiiin.s I) 4 K on 070.5) h. ______% of .Stored Material 30th Notary Public;L. jSx-t-vk, R. •): tr wi ••»-4 (Coltiiiiii P on G70.5) Tliial Kctalnagc (Line 5a 4 5h or Thtal in Column I of G703).. My Comiiiission expires: 1/31/2005 -0- 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE......................i 225,500.00 (Line ‘I lc.v« Line 5 'Ibul) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT (Line (»from prior Ceriifle;t(c)................................I. K. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE.............................. CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT .00 * 77s,snn.nn 9. BALANCE TO FINISH. INCLUDING RETAINAGE (Line 3 le.vi Line f*) I____oa In accordance with the Contract lAKumcni.s, based on on site observations and tlK* data comprising this application, the Oiastruction Manager and Architect certify u> iIk Owm:r that to the iK'st of their knowledge, information and liclicf the Vt^irk has progre.sscd as indicated, ihc (|uality of the Vtturk Ls In accordance wiili the Contract l>cK:umeiU.s, and the Cuimactor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CEUTTPIED. AMOUNT CERTIFIED.............................................................i (AUacb expiafialiott if amount certified lUffers from the amount appUed for. initial ailfittnres on this Appheathm and on tin: Omiinuation Stnet lital chanftcd to conform to the amount certified.) CIIANGI-: ORDER SUMMARY ADDITIONS DI-DUimONS Total changes approved In previous month.s hy Owner 'li>tai approved this Month 7,619.00 lt)TALS 7,619.00 NliT CMANCiliS by Change Order 7,619.00 CON! Ily:Dale ARCIIITUa- By:Dale: Tlii.t Ccrtincaic Is tKM negtRlablc TItc AMOUN1' CERTIFIED is payalde only lo the Con- iracior turned licrcin. IxMiancc. payiiKoi and arccptaiice «>f paynxmi arc wIiImhii prcimlicc lo any rigim of llic Owner or Coniracior under lliis Omiract. .1 • AmjtAIIOtr ANO CtMIIIHMTK l«W IXVMmT • UN«SIM<<ninN MAIMIitiXArWI<ini nmiON WIi KDITHIN • AIA- • fclWi • 1IIK AAiaUlIAN MCillUTR Of AirjineCtX I7.« N«W WUX AtTflHIl!. N W.. VltflilNOnjN.1II: iMia,S7*M • WMMsia: imumms piioionppns <Mmi G702/CMa-1992 CONTINUATION SHEET AIA DOCUMENT G703 (Insirucilon* on reverse side)Moi or nwiRs AIA Document 0702, APPUCATION AND CERTTFICATE I'OK PAYMENT, conialninx OMiiracUH*s signed Ccrilllcillon, Is atiaciKd. In labulailons bekm, amounts are suicd to ihe nearest dollar. U.SC Column I on Contracts where variable rcuinage fur line Items may apply. APPLICATION NO. APPLICATION DATE PERIOD TO ARCIin nCT’S PROJECT NO. 1 1/30/2002 S.E.H. A-BWGR0201.00 A n C D E P G II 1 •WORK COMIM.F. I El>MATERIALS TniAL BALANCE TO FINISH (C - G) REIAINACE (IF VARIABLE) RATE) ITEM NO.DESCRIPTION OF VORK SCIinDULED VALUE FROM PREVIOUS APPUCATION (D ♦ E) THIS PERIOD PRESENTLY STORED (NOT IN D OR E) COMPLETED AND STOKED TO DATE (D«EtF) % (G + C) 100 Mobilisation 10,375.20 OOe10,375.20 Oo•10,375.20 lOOZ .00 .00 200 Clearing 3,000.00 ooe3,000.00 .00 3,000.00 lOOZ .00 .00 300 Grubbing 3,000.00 .00 3,000.00 .00 3,000.00 lOOZ .00 .00 400 Topsoil Striping 14,254.50 OO•14,254.50 Ooe14,254.50 lOOZ .00 .00 500 Construction Rock Entrance 1,000.00 .00 1,000.00 ooa1,000.00 lOOZ .00 .00 600 Surcharge Materials 18,596.50 OO•18,596.50 ooa18,596.50 lOOZ .00 .00 700.Unclassified Excavation11,902.80 •Oo11,902.80 ooa11,902.80 lOOZ .00 .00 800 Granular Borrow 153,802.00 ooa153,802.00 oo•153,802.00 lOOZ .00 .00 900 Silt Fence 1,950.00 .00 1,950.00 ooa1,950.00 lOOZ .00 .00 1 Change Order # 1 • • e 7,619.00 .00 7,619.00 .00 7,619.00 lOOZ .00 .00 : •225,500.00 .00 225,500.00 .00 225,500.00 -—.00 .00 1 MmMm. n.«h msiiiNRRiN. nc iwn6 vn • mnmik ui CAUTION; )>itialwi*l»iw» an AIA dwc umenlwMc htina Nils e«»uHnptlHNd In w<L Aw ofisinal CHANGE ORDER A!A DOCUMiNT G70I O'A'NER □ architect □ CONTRACTOR □ FIELD □ OTHER □ PROJECT: Lons Lake Fire Station (name, address)Q|.QQQ^ Minnesota TO CONTRACTOR: Ingram Excavating Inc. (name, addiess) 18900 Pioneer Trail Eden Prairie. MH 55347 CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: DATE: 1/30/2002 ARCHITECT S PROJECT NO: CONTRACT DATE: 12/4/01 CONTRACT FOR: Package # 1 Site Excavating & E .glnecred Fll S.E.B. No. A-BKVGR 0201.00 The Contract is changed as follows: 1. Ingram guarantees 500 c.y. of select granular borrow left on site to be used by Phase 2 contractor 500 c.y. @ $5.00 per c.y. 2. Settlement Plates (see attached) 3. Type 1 Mulch over all areas disturbed by Phase I 4. Additional silt fence 180 ft @ $1.50 per ft. $2,500.00 $3,960.00 $ 889.00 $ 270.00 TOTAL: $7,619.00 Not valid until signed by the Owner, Architect and Contractor. The original (Contract Sum) (Cuannieed Maximum Price) was ...............................................S 217.881.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders.............................................................$ .00 Tlie (Contraa Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Price) prior to this Cliange Order was ...................$ 217.881.00 The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Price) will be (increased) (daDOiaodk 7.619.00 (unchanged) by this Change Order in die amount of.......................................................$ Tlie new (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Price) including this Change Order will be . .J 225.500.00 The Contraa Time will be (iocfaoaMjISDCSBBBCl) (unclianged) by ( ) day^ The date of Substantial Completion as of the date of tius Qiangc Order therefore is NOTE: Tbc% Aiimniun* ilno ntti rcncvt chungc^ in the CANKnet Nuni. Gmtrjct Time or GuuramcvO .Ma.ximum Pnee 94hich have bevn aiiihori/ctJ h> lAmMfVKCion Change Directive Short Elliott Hendrickson Ingram Excavating Inc._ _ _ City of Long Lake_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ARCHITEtT (;t).VrRAt.TOR OWNER 10901 Red Circle Drive_ _ _ 18900 Pioneer Trail_ _ _ _ _ 1964 Park Avenue_ _ _ _ _ _ _ AUdrvNN AiklfOh Addrew My^onka. ^ Fdf'n'p^rU, MN ) SS34J----- Long I^ka, MM-----55356----------- KVi /_ ^// ' 7/ vj Tt Todd A. IngMdT Vice President date I -J A 17^0 .A DATE 1/3Q/2QQ2 ________ DATE — CAUTION: You should sign an original AIA documsnt which has this caution printed In red. An original sssures that changes will not be obscured as may occur when documents are reproduced. AIA OOCUMDIT 0701 • taUMiC (MOCR • IW EDiTKlN • AIA* • ClWT • TH£ AMOliCAN INSrmTE or ARCHITECr*. I".« NTT YtlBK A\X. XV. VASMINCTUX. OC XU» GT01—1W7 UwSwn—< RiiQiaBasrI ns vlBim n US. Msrriwu Um tnt U iiaii rt w UaU ■wmbmSiii. Alft m2 i tlvif 18900 Pioneer !>•« Eden Prairie. MN 55347 - 1 Tel: (952)934-0917 Fax:(952)934-0901 Change Order Request January 23,2002 Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 10901 Red Circle Drive Suite 200 Minnetonka, Minnesota 66343 Attention:Brad Reifeteck Project Manager Reference:Long Lake Fire Station SEH No,. A-BKVGR0201.00 HTm »mr7:"MMhI lllf*/ I' ; 01/18/02 Dig holes tor setttement plates, but GME could not put in because they did not have proper poles. Bacitfilled and sent operators home PC-400 Hoe, 6 hours @ $175.00 per hour 06M Dozer, 6 hours @ $155.(X) per hour TOTAL: 01/21/02 Dug and installed settlement plates; PC400 Hoe, 6 hours (g $175.00 per hour D6M Dozer, 6 hours Q $155.00 per hour TOTAL: TOTAL THIS CHANGE ORDER REQUEST:$3,960.00 $1,050.00 $930.00 $1,980.00 :^1,050.00 $930 00 $1,980.00 ft r- Vi'. i-tB 2 5 2002 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION uhun O DATE: February 22,2002 ITEM NO: Z<^ Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name RonMoorse City Administrator's TUk City Administrator Report Item Description: Payment Requests - Long Lake Fire Station Attached are invoices from Kirk Program Management, Inc., the project manager, and BKV, the project architect. The invoice from Kirk Program Management, Inc. in the amount of $6,3 1 5.00 is for services provided during the month of January 2002. The invoice from BKV in the amount of $63,682.40 reflects work through January 25, 2002, which includes preparing the final review version of plans and specifications. Both of the attached invoices are recommended for payment. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: 1.Motion to authorize payment of the invoice from Kirk Program Management. Inc. in the amount of $6,315.00.00, and the invoice from BKV in the amount of $63,682.40. Ilfs STATEMENT FOR SERVICeB 1 Kirk Prooram ManaoMiiMit. Inc. I1179 Ssxtant Avs. W. RossvUls. MN S6113 ! Date:11-Fab-02 Frolaet Nama:Lona Laka Fira Station 1 Attantion:Miehalla Moraa 1 IKPIII Proiwt Numtar 103 Parlod:Jan-02 ICharoaa For Tha Currant BilKna Pariod r>—1 PrefliMloral 8#ivIcm January $ 6.210.00 Total Profaaaional Sarvicas $ 6.210.00 Raiinburaablo Eap •ffiMs: Milaaaa • • m - r ^ •6 trips 0 SO Ml. X .36/ml.$ 105.00 Total Raimbwaabla Expanaaa $ 105.00 Total Charaaa This BiHIna Pariod $ 6,315.00 ISummary Of Account Aotivitv Total Houriv Fdas Billtd To Data:$ 21,330.00 Total Ralmbursablas Billed To Date:S 460.45 Total Blllad To Data S 21.799.45 1 Total Paid To Data:$ 15.484.45 Total Amount Dua S 6.315.00 Pagsl zoo/zoo*a 090S#a:iVl SHOT 10 JllIO ZZ96 9il Z96 Se:ZT ZOOZiZrail BKV C ft O U P Aithilactur* iMwtor OMign EngifiMring icfmwi Kfo«» V»§ti Gtiup Imi 222 North S«e«nd Siraat Miiwpop alii, MN 55401 WiphoMi 5B33ft2r52 hoMai 5123394212 www.bkvareup.coA lOf Invoice Invoice N«aDfc«196'n InvoieeDite; JanuftiylS.it Ir- Citv of Lone Lake P.O. Box 606 lW Lake. MN SS3S6 Anentioa: Midielle Morse Project: ISlSill ay of Long Lake ProfMtional Services thioofth 1/2S/02 BUItag Creep: Coonaa#: PheStaftiea 002 ! Cootreet Affloom: Pcroeet Co mplete; e Fm Earned: . “ « Prior Fee BOlings: $222.^.00 60.00% S133J60.00 • • S71232.00 Cuneat Fee Tool:S62J28XK) Reimbursabtes SxBsaaB BoodPaper by Sf. CensultamReinb. CopyP^Mt l/2x 11 Delivery Service Document Priming Express Mail Services Fax Long Dist Telephone Chrgs MUeage/Travel Po«Me ReisnboiuUes Totals Chasa 2A1JOO 5.00 47.85 92.30 855.10 3.11 1.00 0.16 99.45 173 $135440 COO/ZOO‘4 19611 amn oNoi io Alio ZZ96 9^» ZS6 6i:60 ZOOZ.IO’OU --rt C00/C00*4 I96»i Projict: ISiS.Ol J«dii«v25.20Q2 P4e 2 of 2 ♦♦♦ Invoice Total ♦♦♦SSijSnM Outstanding A/R: Balance Due: 49378^ $113,060.66 ly: David Xrooi BiaiH^aiwy Cimiit Etac lott Pyofcntooal Swicos SS9.703D0 S71.147D0 si3atso.o( JUimbonablo Bxponaet:Sl.254.40 Sl^Ul S2J0S.61 OuttidoSorvicw.S2.62S.00 sas.00 S2.710.0( Oihar SorvicM and Foot:sono SO.OO S0D( $0.00 S0.00 $aot Taxaa;S0.00 laoo SOM Total;t63M2M>172.6i3ir Sl30J65.6i • AgedReeeivablaa: gggm 01.120 Dt« 63,612^ M0J7t.M fOQA ^MUMI axvi 9N01 10 uxo U9t 9L9 SS€ 6I<60 ZOOZ.fO’fii t REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION red ii 5 2X2 t • wr uiiONQ Date: 02/2102 Item No: ^ ( Item Description: Request to dispose of surplus vehicle Exhibits: None DISCUSSION The Orono Police Department has been notified that forfeiture actions have been completed on a 1978 Ford Van that was seized by Orono officers in a DWI incident. The police department does not have a use for the van. The completion of the forfeiture has been confirmed by Orono City Attorney Ken Potts. The Orono Police would like to dispose of this van through a sealed bid process after listing the van for sale in the newspaper. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED The Orono Police Department would like authorization to sell by sealed bid one 1978 Ford Van (VIN: E14HHCA2153) X \lpps\wpwin60^wpdocs\sue^coullciI.act ii FEB 2 5 2002 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION t v^r urtowo DATE: February 22,2002 ITEM NO: ^ ). DcpartmcDt Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name RonMoorse City Administrator's Tttk City Administrator Report Item Description: Schedule Volunteer Commission Interviews The City has received applications from two residents who are interested in serving on the Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission. The applicants are Bob Albertson and Keith Erickson. The Council may want to schedule interviews at the start of the March 11 Council meeting. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to schedule interviews for the Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission. . ’ 02/15/199+ 10S29 FROM 04:31 Bi - 5f liRCOC TO • • 2494616 P.02 1 APPUCAttON FOB CIT«H» AOVI s™ ?T3«nKa^ m ■ ’ <rAnAyMQO<i PsL PostOff €0 aap w ' i 9 ^ T^.ph.n. m±»jaLS2.a ** M?f Resident o1 Orono ~ — WorkExpiitenc*: ^i..c.LoS Ywn, ^ fy Edueads•»n: Civic .«■! valuntt* r AcUvWtt (pi« vA prekwOi \tv/ Mi||0iii |aS> 4IM3 02/i5/1994> 10:30 FRCn 2494616 P.03 PlMSi ftit4 your fjatont f ]^mt9P09$»k. UM9 •• • ...... r/ CoimiM^^ is •'. 0^, cmm.nu: the otw Cctmdtta yiiiB i/nuUm i** Coi»ie»t»eeehins- YauneyetnetUeh othei memnmm 7~ ri I underitanj thta «pp<WinK<t "wy bt dMMitd at • p<*®® laiaOnO' „„o„: i « ‘1^ U' A rf?'.. ill I Mr I :k\ :'.ft’f^iiii,yL 0 -r^ V • / rv.-‘--v- ,, - BBwZ’.v. ■--«%^ v7'®*^ ** ‘fi rll^ 02/i5^199+ 10533 FROM 2494616 P.03 C' ..;eia) <7t41T4\^iw !«i2]4ri.«MfAX Robett V. Albertson ifbnce «• w w >»»»«* vWt«‘ Albertson Engineering MnneapoiA MN Mlnneapoib,MN equipment • OMT\ei lool apci die and model shop. • Cesicf’20 ?rd ceve’oped products for major manufarturers. 'Oeo-' cSr Zeal products Incorporated Vice President Sales Mmager, PsitOvmer increased sales from SO million to $34 million. ' Deve’iOoed and manufactured a wide variety of service « US Mit:*ar)' was a major customer • S'jbsec'.ierUy sold manufacturing and product rights to various compantoa. 195^1973 Albertson's Sales Irtc. Mlnneepolt, MN Equipment Distributor and Retal Store Owner • Larees‘ outdoor power equipment dealer in five Stats area. ^ ^ • Soid snowmcbiles. lawn tractors, motorcycles, lawn mowers and stow Woerers. » Crea-ed a saes organization with sales of $10 mWlon through 4 atores. • Gas cr’jnc'^ njjned market - sold out. 4g73_i 3C5 Albertson Industries, Inc. MinneapoSs, MN inventor and Marketing Entrepreneur • Developed numerous products and licensed to related manufackaers. • Hc’ds ov9' ^ 90 patents in the field of mechanical and electronic preducto. • Mater successes; •Fresh brew coffee vending machine. •Ice making equipment •Plastic injection molding machine. . Co-inventor and developer of cassette tape recorder. (Marketed by Fort sid OM). I Original develooerof the Pulsatir^g Shower Massage. ' Orginal developer of Weed-Eater grass trimmer. _ • Emergency kill switch and sW shock absorbers used on all snowmobies. •.Autemoti’/e parts deaners. •.Hydraulic testecuipment. ^ ^ ^ . ceve’cced and manufactured a car chassis dynomornelerwhich sreefcyoqMaM rtc fwc A:teftson’s Dyno Tune-up Centers as vwll as sareioe canrere. °xduct rights were subsequently sold to HartzelManiwrtiatog. • Deveoped and manufactured an indudrial weMs oil fbmaos. PicAirt eoM heevSy for several years. Product rights were subaequafMy aoW. ^ • Developed and manufactured an automotive cftamical Ineeistosed by Race Car Dnve' Bobby Unser. Product rights were sold to Veadar Corponaon. 4 99£-=-esen ‘. AfPTerrainer Reveadonal, Inc linnaapois, MN Inventor and Marketing Entrepreneur • Cc-^nvertor of the AIFTerrainer Trak-Tour amphbious Iranspoiter • v.irrer of Minnesota Inventors Congress 1996 Top Product Aeart. • 1 02/15/199+ 10!32 FROM 2494616 P.02 !! •^VIA SATf'^rp «USA TODW Money 11 ^ i ym AVgMt 2371914 PAY iBwiggag 1 - Inventor t III) ’Ml) I BeU firm and won After three decides as as lavchtor. Robe:! V. Alber* sen b back seDlss vendle; maehias.Hdr7 yean a|o. the tiri- karar «as a n*yBV4l4 ci> pIggFt oU MtsaeBpeUs soda- macbtoc maker and the proud peswBof of hb flnt pttenc an iced-drtok dis poser. which b stStlh pr> dtiCttOILToday, b s pbat cc the ttore of Lake Miaaeteaka. Maa. AibcraeoY 70 cr - plef«aRte«eibblyctafik- lo| out oeodlsg BtacUBiS of aether sort pay tcicpbt His sompaoy, Tonk-a- Fhone Inc. bad 1383 Sbla^f S33 nduioo. Now, he hv 855 iriiUon worth o* OfdefS on the bools «kh and sdMa are cxpeOBd to top 870 nWoo byacRsuoMBW.ITS SdagOat AibsM b In a peelOoo to cadb la as the burietmini pitott pay -shone Indosory. Be wv the aist to po to toe aad whh a Ben company over lb pay pbone moaopoly aadwfaL In 1973. while foalat a tbriviai terriee atatlon mikA'ili ESC?;ha lad dtopati which toSanadatoai the flmtoepapv uiuipeMtoataerheili latod.Ilf *^“bSTcMi i I 02/'15/l99+ 105 31 FROM 2494616 P.ei founUy «R purc!ir.<>c(l or \t\ Uic ofthebur ‘ ‘_________ilIAngJn which‘Iicyar*; lo cated. It's iqi to tlie owner to a lunj:- diftancc canter. Brcatm Oranjjr i« buying a large ain>>>ini of •ei^ce from AT&T. cuo offer discounted prices to Vs pay-ph'*'’c c”«toto- efS, who otftcrwi.n; wimld pay n«oro frr. and get lav profit from. !(m^*d\Nta*icv culb made on thdr pay phones. The advantage to (r*Tiin^ a orivatc oay phone is that the wrer can keep -be reve nue generated by vs*-*', etaily is greater than the typical 2 percent to 7 percent ca«n>iiiv«on t'lat 'wiMin-.: owners receive wHc!!: *i»ey buy »I*t— y and service from loc-a: lelephejer conspa. nics. Called Orange Plmnes. th>* i»a. ph-ines sold ^ Orange Cnr.rT*2nic?t:c-s rffv- lowerhmg-^liitana*rate?forca'ic*> A: »hr same time, owners of Orance Phoiup* tv * oeive what Albi-rtyji! tout' ..ic .les'. profit margins in •h<-i«»y*phoiv-ip<I«ist'}-. The AT&T contra-:* will ni- .«‘i a !'.*'» v- mure than 920 iU’O'-al tance service for Nt-Ci Ct.-n:r;-s.*v;caf:';v.;. Inc., which now pT'ivJdr« riu- .51X5 Kvisitinji Orange Phones with !ong-dls*avc<-service. A lifelong inw.-*t*'*r and hnlrrr of viori- than 60 patents, ^'-her*snn. .Kt. star»*?d marketiag the rat:-;is\ firs! ;;f!>a'.c pay telephone In 1082 i”; Twin mbvrlss. But nis call for profits went u^a•lS'vcrc^i. In an effort to iw-athc ncv.- Mh- inU- the csimpany, privateh i-eldOrar-tc-wominu- nicationsfour years agu started '.verkiez !.*o anewdeaigoandipa'-kclim*'lrat«-t> for U' payphones. “Wc*vc contln-icc to prod-.»c*.* •• time, but sales wc-"l dn**- ’ -.■v -i-im; v . v were Just anotlw* • ---oo iel!-r.c psy pbuon,*' Alhc*ts V' -i jd. "It's I’ke Gilb-tto. which Sells tiJC raror handle? b-’t ~>akn? moocy* by sdling their 5jlade?.‘ The J.5-«n>plo\« Oran-ic C-.-irr.v.:rJca. tions discovered its '^wr. !ik«- ap proach last summer, when i* l>-»ti-n its Orange Phone. The company tx-.-.ai't ?nr- vicc thiou^ MCI. which p.*'»v'dcd Or ange Phone customers the <?pp-jrv.ir.5ty to make long'distarcv vails .v'N’.'bo-C' 5- ’bo continent^ United State.? for 21- cents a ninute. Orange Phone owners kept the revcBiNS '■)adc from the phones, but paid MQ about IS oants m oveiy minuto el lea^ dittaneo sarvfcu. Orange Commuaien- »!»•«. in turn, roceivtsi al^t 5 ocnls of or* c*v IS cents sent to MCI aageus Its Und Non-Orange Pbi^ pay phones twlcally which oiaigBare serviced by ATdcT.---- ;*ay-pbonc custmers about SS for the first minute, and about -W cents each addi- •ional minute, inalong-distanoecall. The rate is high because the long-dis- •ance service is beta); provided to only one r.'uy phone or group of pay phones. Smaller volume Is moreeoniensive to setviee. “ATSrT ta taitfled. .?o they can't be very ntrxiMe with the ral.^ they duife.” Al- tyvtson said. *3ut we cun do it becanm v.c*rc buying large volumw of time from them arid s^ing it t- Orange Pbone cus tomers.*' That, Albertson said, is the key to hb iy. -mpany's future. MOien Orange (brntmunicatioa de- c-ded to connect k-w-cost iong-distanoe ?»-*vice with its Oran j*ePhones, ATStT still w as restricted by the Vedcral Communlca- liiint Commission on the service rates it c*.*uld offer. In October 1989. however, the FCC permitted ATfleT to offer a new volume- d<.<tcount plan with lower prices than tbm nilowed earlier in th«- year. Atbertaon said. A.? a result. Orange Communications de cided to drop MCI and c-» w\th ATfcT be- ■(inninginMay. With AT&T's K'vice. Orange Phon e n«vm-r? wiSi be charged about IS cents a -mute for long-distance caUs. That gives Orange Pbone owntTT. a profit of dwot 10 ct-nl? a minute, or about 40 percent, on cud) call. Under the terms u{ its commitment widi AT&T, OrangeCommunicationsagRCSto I'ring in at lea.<U fW million word) ^ long distance service for AT&T over die amt r-mr vean. Albcitsor said liuplaaa to nmfl ansA of ft to bud- AlMrttoBald. Nobody dm has luir nnnnimt. WaUba 'hat wffl want our waHaltotiytoobto iPtbdrbudaamlhiai.- Orange Cemasaaleatiow w4D offer budoam phoau nams at lead a 29 paicent disoouat OB AT&Ta dirad-dial toog-db- tanoa rato^ d^iwdlng on the votuae of basaid. FoeAlbmfB,bacwh>fanATfcTdi»» trfbutor, cBteutor and budBOi partner h quite tewfldl. Inthuemlydqfsof IdibudDcm. AT&T*! Nortbweetera M Tdeplm» Co. war pnlUiig in an todtoOtod 911 wflUwi in an nual paiy-phoni luvanti. Ai AlbcrtronV pay phoMdartaddhowtogopasa ooDpet- gas statfoM, NorthfurfdBRi Bdl darted cot- dag ttsMivteutoffKmpbona. AlbmtotofiiiilithiinBHurtotheMimio. aotaPtiblicUtflitteaGoinmtedOD, wfaiAia June 1984 oidmod Nort fawaduro Bdl to provide sBvtee to pclvataly owned pay fird date to allow aoii-MlepheDC eofDpaay payphoMtoboaoldaDdopautod. wvw w w •—w — - — Oranj^e Cororouziication» already is re^ hkmn mslUewi a Smure tlun S20 milUon worth of iong-oistaiKo leivioi annually — businCBrii|^ ^11 -------- w ^ i*^ established since teaming up with MCI lust summer. Officials with AT&T in Minneapolis ;.uid the reselling arrungeroent with Or- ot ber ildnidAmwIdi AT&T. "Wawaretheonm who deregulated the peivato poy-phmbodoaa aft^qiendiog 9887,000 Id aWo»nw» ftoa," AIbcftaaa said. *1 dro waa one of tfat partis ttiat helpedbnakBpthoMISyrtra.'' boarting aboot his buttis wHh AT&T, Aftartnoatod IPs dme to bisy the hatchet, or wtenoottsi, aslt may be. ”We ware Ube tfw Uolted Stats aad Ruida, rtody to try and blow eadi edsT off tho map, bdbiu Oinp dtaagud.** he said. “But wer'veabeadybadeurwu. One side woo, and now it’i tiine to look at working tofetts.'* •4' application for citizen advisory commission CITY of ORONO tell Municipal Ofncas Streat Addrats: 2750 KaHay Piflwiy Orono. MN SS356 Hailing Address: P.O. loi 66 CiysUl Bay. MN 55323-00(6 CommiMlon Applying For: O Park* Comml»»lon D Planning Comml»»lon Q Community Task Force (Name)____^jcc-------------------------- Name.Keith R. Erickson, P.E Address 2040 North Shore Drive Post Office & Zip C adewayzata. MN 55391 Telephone (H) Qg?-47^-7nsi (W) Qc:7-7.jt;-n7nfi Resident of Orono iQ plus years.CATV subscriber for that length of time also. Work Experlance: a registered professional engineer, I have spent »ork car^r In the elertric utllltY business, see attachea reaune. While gol^to MiTeae I did sumrer work in the broadcasting business in rural Nebraska and worked ^rt^ine at the flagship studio of the Nebraska Educational Television Network (Channel 12), KUON-TV at the Univ. of Nebraska, 1967-1968. Education: 3 3^ Electrical Engineering, with distinction in 1968 from University of Nebraska -Lincoln Civic and Volunteer Activities (past and present): Owatonna, MN Lions Club—1985-1990 Robbinsdale City Band-1992 to present. Plymouth Comnunity Concert Band 1997 to present Tdc^oa* (6U) 47»-7357 • FAX47»4510 L PUa«« state your reasons for wanting to serve on this Commission. IWesarr be es speeiflG es possible. Use edditiensi sheet If necessery.l Provide engineering input based upon my experience to the t>ICC WhBt Is your visw of the ro!s of the Commissions At the present time# I have a neutral view of the IMCC* other Comments: {Use this space to Include any further Information you would like City Council to consider, or that you feel Is relevant to the appointment seeking You may also attach other materials you would like the Council to consider.) The majority of mj’ work experience has been on the distribution level where interface of the electric utility and the CATV company was reouired. I understand this appointment may be discussed at a public meeting. Signanirt ^ f ••NOTE: Volunteer commission member's name, address and phone number . will beoome pubtte Information. 040«M4 -T -^-^1- Keith R. Erickson, P.E. 2040 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391-9345 Home Phone: 952-473-7051 Email: kognw@gte.net Experience: Manpower Professional-Bloomington, MN (Client: ABB, Inc. Ham Lake, MN) I l/2(M)0>Present: Field Consultant Engineer—Provided engineering services on a part time basis, from my residence. Projects consisted of; 1. Preparing a computer model o " a large paper facility and performing fault studies and relay coordination using SKM's Power Tools for Windows (PTW). 2. Serving as Project Engineer for a ' design &build" project for Xcel Energy near Denver, CO. Project consisted of the installation of two 45 MVAR, 115 kV capacitors SW of Denver and two 36 MVAR 115 kV capacitors at Greeley, CO. Installations utilized 145 kV IPO breakers. Both locations required modifications to existing facilities. Associated Consultants Engineers, Inc.(ACEI) Plymouth, MN 8/92>10/2000 Consulting Electrical Engineer— Provided consulting services to municipal electric power systems in Minnesota, Iowa, and Wisconsin. Specifically, prepared bid specifications for furnishing and installation of power transformers, switchgear, substations and other distribution equipment. Performed special studies for distribution planning, power flow, short circuit, and relay coordination using software such as EZ- Power, SKM’s PTW, and MilSoft ’s WindMil. Arrowhead Management Services-Golden Valley, MN 2/91-8/92 Attempted to market engineering services pertaining to Utility Mapping and Information Systems. Owatonna Public Utilities, Owatonna, MN 6/84-1/91 Distribution Superintendent (Gas and Electric) Facilitated major changes at the Utility including application of personal computers to engineering and drafting. During my tenure the Electric System load went from 30 MW to 50 MW. Served as Project Manager for a major substation project (East Owatonna Station) SSS?c™ Nebr^ka, including Kearney, Nebraska (50 MW load) j!?,**,**??.’ *• ''™y- Ac«v* Duly, cMlislcd li^ta player, in the First Infantiy and 24th Infantry Band at Fort Riley, Kansas. Honorably discharged as an E-5 specialist Edocilioii: B.S.E.E. (wilh dislinclion) W63^68 University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska Professioult Regisiered Professioiial EIccIrical Engineer Stales of Nebraska (1976), Minnesota (1984). and Iowa (1997) Other: Hobbies: How F cTf 7™ p*? ■" >9«) iifia* . License since 1965 (Now l.f«.^)holder of FCC certiBed General Radio TelephonfoJe^Z Certified as a Communications Technician by the Personal Communications Industry Association Grew up on a South Central Nebraska 320 acre farm eZZC® Still have agricultural intereste in Nebraska (owning fami land and participating in a family owned partnership) ^ Amateur Radio Vintage Radios, participate in the Robbinsdale City Sti« “X* o'her musWr ^s, cSatrir «».i. FEB 2 5 2002 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ui i r ur unuivo DATE: February 22,2002 ITEM NO: .^3 Dcpartmcnl Approval: Name RonMoorse TUI* City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: City Open House Plans Several months ago. The Otono Police Department, in cooperation with the North Tonka Crime Prevention Coalition, began planning for a Police Department open house. As the planning process proceeded, the plans were expanded to include all city departments, as well as a fun run. The open house is geared toward families, and is planned as a community get-together. The event will be held the morning of Saturday, May 18. The event will require funding in an amount that could approach $1,000. Staff is requesting the Council authorize the expenditure of up to $1,000 for the open house. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to authorize the expenditure of up to $1,000 related to the May 18 open house-community get-together. 'I REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION FEB 2 5 2002 on » unui^u DATE: February 22,2002 ITEM NO: ^ / Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Naoic Ron Moorse W)/'i City Administrator’s Title City Administrator Report Item Description: Schedule Council Worksessions The Council has indicated it will hold a joint worksession with the Park Commission in March. Also, it is important that the Council meet in a worksession to discuss development issues related to the Highway 12 area. 1 have not been successful in finding a date that works in late February or early March. One possibility is to plan the two woilcsessions for 5:30 p.m. prior to each of the two Council meetings in March. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to select dates and times for Council worksessions in March. r REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Februaiy21,2002 «,f-rTING •"EB 2 5 2002 Ciir urUHONo ITEM NO: Z ^ Dcpartnent Approval: Name Lin Vee Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Licenses Title City Clerk Item Description: List of L icenses for Council Approval GAMBLING PERMIT - RESOLUTION 1.Applicant: Event: Location: Date: Time: Orono Hockey Boosters, Inc. UI2 State Girls Hockey Tournament Orono Ice Arena • 1025 Old Cry stal Bay Road March 17,2002 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. SPECIAL EVENT I.Applicant: Event: Race Route: Date: Time: Gear West April Fools Race - 5 Kilometer Foot Race Start and finish at Holbrook Park, Long Lake. To cover Brown Road, Fox Street, Willow Drive and Grand Avenue. April 7,2002 9:00 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. 2.Applicant: Event: Race Route: Date: Time: Wells Fargo Bank - Wayzata Half Marathon Race Start at Norwest Bank Wayzata, Lake Street to Ferndale Road to County Road 15 to Orono Orchard Road to Fox Street to Old Crystal Bay Road to County Road 51 to County Road 19 to Northview Road to Lake Road to County Road 15 to Old Beach Road to County Road 19 to Beehrle Avenue to the Southwest LRT Trail to Water Street. Finish at Nonvest Bank Excelsior. Sunday, May 5,2002 8:00 a.m. • ll;00a.m. 3.Applicant: Event: Location: Date: Time: Gear West Duathlon (5 K Run/30 K Bike/4 K Run) Orono Middle School and Surrounding Areas May 19,2002 7:00 a.m. - II :00 a.m. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve/deny the above listed licenses. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF ORONO HOCKEY BOOSTERS, INC. FOR A ONE DAY MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING EXEMPT PERMIT WHEREAS, the Orono Hockey Boosters, Inc. have applied to the State of Minnesota Gambling Control Board for a Minnesota Lawful Gambling Exempt Permit to conduct lawful gambling activities; and WHEREAS, the Orono Hockey Boosters. Inc. propose to conduct a one day gambling activity (raffle) as part of the U12 State Girls Hockey Tournament to be held at the Orono Ice Arena located at 1025 Old Crystal Bay Road on March 17,2002; and WHEREAS, the Orono Hockey Boosters, Inc. are required to obtain approval of the gambling activity from the city in which the activity will occur. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Orono City Council does hereby approve the application for a Minnesota Lawful Gambling Exempt Permit for the Orono Hockey Boosters, Inc. to conduct a one day gambling activit)’ (raffle) at the Orono Ice Arena on March 17, 2002. 2002. Adopted at a regular meeting of the Orono City Council this 2Sth day of February, ATTEST:Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Q, V14 . ! CITY OF ORONO SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT Date Issued: Date of Event: Time: February 26,2002 April 7. 2002 9:00 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. Name of Person(s) And/or Organization Sponsoring this Event: Erik Kaitala Gear West 1786 West Wayzata Boulevard Long Lake. MN 55356 Phone: 952-473-0377 Type of Event:April Fools Race - 5 Kilometer Fool Race Location of Event: Start and finish at Holbrook Park, Long Lake. To cover Brown Road, Fo.\ Street, Willow Drive and Grand Avenue. Parking for all runners will be at Gear West (1908 West Wayzata Boulevard). The following documents are required and on File at the City Administrative Offices: • Certificate of General Liability Insurance • Route of Race Event • Approval from Orono Police Department The following conditions have been placed on this event: • Event organizer to provide traffic control personnel to direct and assist runners at the following intersections: - Willow Drive and Glendale - Willow Drive and Watertown Road - Willow Drive and Fo.x Street - Fo.x Street and County Road 146 - County Road 146 and Watertown Road • Any citizen helpers at road crossings should be provided w ith a traffic control vest (available at the Orono Police Department at no charge). • Compliance w ith all conditions of the special event permit issued by the City of Long Lake. • Runners are not to obstruct traffic. • Final arrangements for traffic control will need to be addressed and communicated to Sergeant Kurt Erickson at 952-249-4700 no later than March 15, 2002. • The special event permit is subject to immediate revocation by the Orono Police Department upon violation of any City Ordinances or identification of hazards to safety of the public. Approved at City Council meeting on: February* 25,2002 (City Seal) Ronald J. Moorse, City Administrator 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone: 952-249-4600 / Fax: 952-249-4616/www.ci.oronojnn.us CITY OF ORONO SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT Date Issued: Date of Event: Time: Februar>' 26, 2002 May 5. 2002 8:00 a.m. • 11:00 a.m. Name of Person(s) And/or Organiiation Sponsoring this Event: Loretta Docken Wells Fargo Bank - Wayzata 900 East Way/ata Boulevard Wayzata, MN 55391 6I2-3I6-I44IPhone: Type of Event:Wells Fargo Half Marathon Location of Event:Begin: Wells Fargo Bank Wayzata. Lake Street to Femdale Road to County Road 15 to Orono Orchard Road to Fo.\ Street to Old Ciystal Bay Road to County Road 51 to County Road 19 to Northview Road to Lake Road to County Road 15 to Old Beach Road to County Road 19 to Beehrle Avenue to the Southwest LRT Trail to Water Street. Finish: Wells Fargo Bank Excelsior The following documents are required and on file at the City Administrative Offices: • Certificate of General Liability Insurance • Route of Race Event • Approval from Orono Police Department The following conditions have been placed on thb event: • Police presence w ill be required at the key crossings listed below because of past problems w ith uncooperative drivers: - County Road 15/Wcst Femdale Road - County Road 146/Fox Street County Road 51/County Road 84 - County Road 51/County Road 19 Lake Road/County Road 15 - County Road 19/Old Beach Road • Final arrangements for traffic control w ill need to be addressed by Wells Fargo and communicated to Sergeant Kurt Erickson at 952-249-4700 no later than March 22. 2002. • Any citizen helpers at road crossings should be provided w ith a traffic control vest (available at the Orono Police Department). • The special event permit is subject to immediate revocation by the Orono Police Department upon violation of any City Ordinances or identification of hazards to safety of the public. Approved at City Council meeting on: February 2a, 2002 (City Seal) Ronald J. Moorse, City' Administrator 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone: 952-249-4600 / Fax: 952-249-4616/www.ci.orono.mn.us 1 J Date of Event: Time: CITY OF ORONO SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT May 19, 2002 7:00 a.m. - I l:00a.m, Name of Person(s) And/or Organization Sponsoring this Event: Jarrod Sokolowski Gear West 1786 West Wayzata Boulevard Long Lake, MN 55356 Phone: 952-473-0093 PHAl!T Type of Event:Duathlon (5 K Run/30 K Bike/4 K Run) Location of Event: Orono Middle School & Surrounding Areas The following documents are required and on file at the City Administrative Offices: Certiricate of General Liability Insurance Route of Race Event Approval from Orono Police Department Approval from Orono Schools Notification of event to the City of Medina, Three Rivers Park District and Hennepin County Department of Transportation The following conditions have been placed on this event: • Event organizer to provide traffic control personnel at the following intersections: - County Road 6 and Old Crystal Bay Road at start ofthe race and on return of racers County Road 6 and I lunter Drive All traffic control personnel should be provided with a tralTic control vest. Participants to run against traffic and bike with tralTic. Signs from Warning Lights or equivalent, warning of “heav'y pedestrian traffic ahead - ne.xt 4 miles” or whatever is commercially av lilable (signs to be placed for eastbound trafiic at County Road 6 and Jamestown Road and for westbo’ind traffic at County Road 6 and Hollander Road). • Final arrangement.*^ for traffic control will need to be addressed and communicated to Sergeant Kurt Erickson at 952-249-4700 no later than April 30,2002. • The special event permit is subject to immediate revocation by the Orono Police Department upon violation of any City Ordinances or identification of hazards to safety of the public. Approved at City Council meeting on: February 25, 2002 (City Seal) _____________________________________ Ronald J. Moorse, City Administrator 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone: 952-249-4600 / Fax: 952-249-4616/www.ci.o t)no.mn.us CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 02/22/02 9 58 AM Page 1 FEBRUARY 2002 Check Amt Invoice Comment FEB 2 5 ?0(fe Oil r ur UMUiVU 10100 Primary Cash __________________ Paid dhk# 072985 2725^2002 A.J. GALLAGHER & CO OF MN. INC E 601-49400-370 Insurance Agent of Record E 602-49450-370 Insurance Agent of Record E 101-41900-370 Insurance Agent of Record E 101-42110-370 Insurance Agent of Record E 613-49830-370 Insurance Agent of Record ToUl A.J. GALLAGHER ft CO OF MN. INC $80 00 16615 $18500 16615 $550 00 16615 $91000 16615 $7500 16615 $1,800 00 Qtr 1 Ins Agent Qtr 1 Ins Agent Qtr 1 Ins Agent Qtr 1 Ins Agent Qtr 1 Ins Agent Paid Chk# 072986 2/25/2002 ANDERSON. BRUCE E 101 -42110-437 Training & Development Total ANDERSON. BRUCE $29 50 020602 $29 50 Meals • Training Paid Chki 072987 2/25/2002 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SERVICES E 101-42110-201 Office supplies $132 00 6013-235030 Coffee E 101-42110-201 Office supplies $132 00 6013-235031 Coffee E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $66 00 6013-235032 Coffee ToUl ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SERVICES $330 00 Paid Chki 072988 2/2S'2002 ASP E 101-42110-221 -iquipmenl Parts & Accessories T *31 ASP $61.16 128207 $61 16 Retaining Clips, Mouthgrds Paid Chki 072989 2/25/2002 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO. E 601-49400-405 Repairs/Maint-Watermains/plant $236 43 12881S Maint - Nav Water Plant Total AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO.$23643 Paid Chki 072990 2/25/2002 BETTER ROADS E 101-43000-433 Memberships & Subscriptions Total BETTER ROADS $24 00 36142 $2400 2002 Subscription Paid Chk# 072991 2/25/2002 BLACKOWIAK S SON E 101-41900-489 Other Miscellaneous Charges E 613-49830-489 Other Miscellaneous Charges E 101-45200-415 Other Equipr^ent Rentals ToUl BLACKOWIAK S SON $191 72 10121646 $19 73 10121686 S1S7S0 10121728 $369 25 Waste Service 1/02 Waste Service 1/02 Waste Service 1/02 Paid Chk# 072992 2/25/2002 BOYER FORD ft TRUCK G 101-20200 Accounts Payabla $330 98 406673 Dash Lights - PW Truck G 101-20200 Accounts Payable ($190 00) 407618 Dash Lights • PW Truck Total BOYER FORD ft TRUCK $14098 Paid Chki 072993 2/25/2002 CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE E 101-42110-437 Training & Development $400 00 6 Max the Opportunity-McNichots ToUl CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE $400 00 2/25/2C02Paid Chki 072994 E 101-41900-223 Bidg/Grounds Maint. Supplies ToUl CITYVIEW PLUMBING S HEATING CITYVIEW PLUMBING & HEATING $41 29 20568 $41 29 Ignitor Paid Chki 072995 2/25/2002 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN E 101-41900-322 Postage E 101-41900-322 PosU;ie Tout CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN $51.90 1971961 $51.90 1980545 $103 80 2002 Mat & Equip Bid 2002 Mats Equip Bid Paid Chki U72996 2/25/2002 CROW RIVER SUSPENSION S ALIGN CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 02/22^)2 9 38 AM E 101-43000-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip Total CROW RIVER SUSPENSION fl» ALIGN FEBRUARY 2002 Checic Amt Invoice Comment $79 00 1709 Align #426 $79 00 Paiddhkf 072997 2/25/2002 CYS UNIFORMS E 101 *42110*226 Clothing & personal equipment ToUl CYS UNIFORMS $262 26 5882 $26226 Uniform Shlrts/Pants Tomczyk Paid Chk* 072996 2/25/2002 OCA • 'MIRE ONLY G 101-21719 DCA/Spending Accounts Total DCA-WIRE ONLY $344 40 2/20/02 $344.40 Spending Accounts 2/20 Paid Chki 072999 2/25/2002 DELTA DENTAL G 101-21709Dental Insurance Total DELTA DENTAL $<.257 70 37220072 $1.257 70 OenUI Ins 3/2002 Paid Chki 073000 2/25/2002 DEMBOUSKI. JAY E 101*42110*437 Training & Development ToUl DEMBOUSK),JAY $6 90 021102 $6 90 Meats * Training PaKl Chk# 073001 2/25/2002 OODGE, RACHEL E 101*41300*437 Training & Development ToUl DODGE. RACHEL $24 95 021502 $24 95 Mileage/Parking-Municipals Paid Chki 073002 2/25/2002 ORIVERS LICENSE GUIDE CO. E 101 *42110*433 Memberships & Subscriptions ToUl DRIVERS LICENSE GUIDE CO. $24.95 376067 $2495 2002 ID Checking Guide Paid Chk# 073003 2/25/2002 E 101-43270*316 Contract Recycling Pickup E 101-43270-316 Contract Recycling Pickup Tout E-Z RECYCLING $6,317.64 3332 $6.317 64 3332 $12,63528 Recycling Service • 1/2002 Recycling 1/2002 Paid Chk» C73004 2/25/2002 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS. IN E 101-42110*221 Equipment Parts & Accessones $247 58 INV264642 Total EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS. IN $247 58 Medical Supplies Paid Chki 073005 2/25/2002 ENERGY SALES INC. E 101-41900*223 Bldg/Grounds Main! Supplies Total ENERGY SAI.E3 INC. $126 00 7007^ $126 00 Ignitor - Shop Heater Paid Chki 073006 2/25/2002 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS E 601-49400-227 Utility System Maint Supplies $27 80 24993 E 601*49400*201 Office supplies $25 56 25061 Total ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS $53 36 Plan Copies Plan Copies Paid Chki 073007 2/25/2002 ERICKSON. KURT E 101-42110*437 Training & Development E 101*42110*331 Travel Expenses Total ERICKSON, KURT $100 00 022102 $10 00 022102 $110 00 DOER/Gov Conference Parking - Court Paid Chki 073008 2/25/2002 FEDEX E 101-41900*322 Postage ToUl FEDEX $22.01 4-101-08332 $2201 Delivery to Flint Paid Chki 073009 2/25/2002 FORTIS BENEFITS G 101-21712 Other Deductions $1.079.32 4019825*1 LTD Premiums • 3/2002 CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Registei® 02/22/02 9 58 AM Page 3 Tout FORTIS BENEFITS FEBRUARY 2002 Check Amt Invoice Comment $1,079 32 PaidChk« 073010 2/25/2002 g4KSERVICES E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds $109 42 104308 Mat Service - PD E 101-43000-226 Clothing & personal equipment $57 23 118413 Uniforms E 602-49450-226 Clothing & personal equipment $2454 118413 Uniforms E 613-49830-226 Clothing & personal equipment $7 72 118414 Uniform - Steffenhagen E 601-49400-226 Clothing & personal equipment $1408 118415 Uniform • Rathbun E 101-43000-221Equipment Parts & Accessories $51 02 125450 Shop Towels E 602-49450-226 Clothing & personal equipment $2591 125450 Uniforms E 101-43000-226 Clothing & personal equipment $60 44 125450 Uniforms E 613-49830-226 Clothing & personal equipment $7 72 125451 Uniform - Steffhagen E 601-49400-226 Clothing & personal equipment $1408 125452 Uniform • Rathbun Tout GAKSERV1CES $372 6 Paid Chk« 073011 2/25/2002 GENUINE PARTS CO. E 101-43000-221Equipment Parts & Accessories $882 2541824 Shop Supplies E 101-43000-221Equipment Parts & Accessories $4 00 2552144 Lens E 101-43000-221Equipment Parts & Accessories $6 38 677249 Socket E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $1703 677276 Shop Supplies E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $18 23 678054 WD40. Cleaning Sup E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $21 43 678093 Oil Filter E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $8 51 678317 Splash E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $46 98 678755 Air Filter E 101-43000-221Equipment Parts & Accessories $38 68 678756 Coupler. Grease Gun ToUl GENUINE PARTS CO.$170 06 Paid Chki 073012 2/25/2002 GOPHER STATE ONE^CALL E 601-49400-489 Other Miscellaneous Charges $14 72 2010601 Locates • 1/2002 E 602-49450-489 Other Miscellaneous Charges $1473 2010601 Locates • 1/2002 ToUl GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL $2945 Paid Chk# 073013 2/25/2002 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TECH OPT E 101-41900-329 Other Communications $80 48 22017183 ToUl HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TECH DPT $80 48 Database Access PaidChk# 073014 2/25/2002 HUEBSCH RENTAL SERVICE E 613-49830-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds Total HUEBSCH RENTAL SERVICE $51 73 79425 $51 73 Mat Service • GC Paid Chk# 073015 2/25/2002 KOOLMO CONSTRUCTION G 225-20200 Accounts Payable C 225-20200 Accounts Payable Total KOOLMO CONSTRUCTION $4.772 98 RFP3 8Fin $749 99 RFP3&Fin $5,522 97 RFP #3 & Final-Nav Park RFP #3 & Final-Nav Park Paid Chk# 073016 2/25/2002 LEAGUE OF MN CI1 lES INS. TRUST E 703-49960-151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem $29.379 00 02-000362-17 IstHalf 2002 Work Comp ToUl LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS. TRUST $29,379 00 Paid Chk# 073017 2/25/2002 LMCIT-BERKLEY ADMIN G 703-20200 Accounts Payable ToUl LMCIT-BERKLEY ADMIN $1.000 00 11038527 $1.000 00 J. Gregory • Bobcat Deduct Paid Chk# 073018 2/25/2002 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 602-49450-437 Training & Development $58.60 2021693 $150.00 Vector Clinic Felt Strip • Sweeper Vactor Trudt Clinic CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 02^2A)2 9:5dAM Page 4 FEBRUARY 2002 Check Amt Invoice Commefit ToUl MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT $208.60 Paid Chk# 073019 2/25/2002 MAGIC CLEANERS E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories Total MAGIC CLEANERS $29 53 $2953 1/31/02 Blanket Cleaning PaidChk* 073020 2/25/2002 MAMA E 101-41300^33 Memberships & SubscnpOons Total MAMA $4500 $4500 269 2002 MAMA Mbrshp-Moorse Paid Chk# 073021 2/25/2002 MBC PRESENTATIONS E 613-49830-437 Training ^ Development Total MBC PRESENTATIONS $7500 $75.00 3/5/02 Alcohol Sale Sem • Steffnhgn Paid Chk# 073022 2/25/2002 MEOICA G 101 -15998 Non-Employee Health Ins G 101-21706 Hospitalization/Medical Ins G 101-21706 Hospitalization/Medical Ins G 101-21706 Hospitalization/Medicat Ins Total MEDICA $1.529 37 102060102552 Medica High 3/02 $10,054.90 102060102552 Medica High 3A)2 $2.226 94 102060122585 Medicd-Low 3/02 $8,711 96 102060125488 Medica Elect 3/02 $22,525.17 Paid Chk# 073023 2/25/2002 E 602-49450-383 MWCC-Current Charges Total MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS $21.971 90 733740 $21,971 90 Wastewater 3/2002 Paid Chk# 073024 2/25/2002 MILE E 101 -42110-437 Training & Development Tout MILE $22500 $22500 21007 Drunk Driving - Fischer Paid Chk# 073025 R 101-34650 2/25/2002 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Police Reports $6 00 Sis Tx 1/02 Sales Tax • 1/2002 R 601-39610 Miscellaneous Revenue $37 00 Sis Tx 1/02 Sales Tax • 1/2002 R 101-34210 General Taxable Sales/Service $4500Sis Tx 1/02 Sales Tax - 1/2002 G 601-20806 Due to Govts-State Sales Tax $439 00 SIsTx 1/02 Sales Tax • 1/2002 Total MN DEPT OF REVENUE $527 00 Paid Chk# 073026 2/25/2002 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION E 101-43000-433 Memberships & Subscriptions $24 80 Books Total MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION $24 80 2000 Standard Specs Paid Chk# 073027 2/25/2002 MN WEIGHTS & MEASURES E 101-42110-319 Other Professional Services $200 00 60830-12698 Scale Certification Total MN WEIGHTS A MEASURES $200 00 Paid Chk# 073028 2/25/2002 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS E 225-45219-530 Other Improvements $2.249 66 16682 Total MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS $2,249 68 Fountain - Navarre Park Paid Chk# 073029 2/25/2002 NAVARRE HARDWARE E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $6.17 94410 Batteries E 101-45200-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $2.12 94434 Rope E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $3 59 94559 Teflon Tape. Galv Cap E 101-43000-222 Vehicle Equipment A Parts $7 44 94697 Battery. Bolts E 101-42110-201 Office supplies $2.12 94707 Keys E 101-41900-223 Bidg/Grounds Maint. Supplies $46 82 94884 Ice Melt E 101-43000-240 Small Tools and Minor Equip $28 74 94897 Post CITY OF ORONO 02/22A)2 9 58AM Pages *Check Detail Register® FEBRUARY 2002 E 101-41900-223 E 101-41900-223 E 601-49400-221 E 101-43000-221 E 101-42110-201 E 101-42110-221 E 101-43000-221 E 101-42110-221 E 101-43000-221 E 101-42110-201 E 602-49450-222 E 101-41900-223 E 101-43000-240 BkJg/Grounds Maint. Supplies Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies Equipment Parts & Accessories Equipment Parts & Accessories Office supplies Equipment Parts & Accessories Equipment Parts & Accessories Equ^xnent Parts & Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Office supplies Vehicle Equ^ment A Parts Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies Small Toots and Minor Equip Total NAVARRE HARDWARE Check Amt Invoke Comment $7.44 95000 Fluo Bulb $30.01 95008 Misc Hardware $12.23 95032 Marking Paint $16.78 95041 Light Bulbs $6.37 95123 Ant Traps. Kilter $22.19 95197 Cleaning Supplies $1021 95276 Bulk Washers $1497 95309 Mailbox-Kennel $339 95415 Shop Supplies $3.18 95502 Utility Hook $3.18 95543 Light Bulbs $5.63 95558 Rat Trap $1.59 $234.17 95565 Key Paftf Chk« 073031 212H2002 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS G 101-21710 Life Insurance ToUl NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS $192 00 6732302 $192 00 PERA Life 3/2002 PaidCMdl 073032 2/25/2002 NEIL NELSON 4 ASSOCIATES E 101 -42110-437 Training A Development $250 00 1/11/02 Interrogation Training ToUl NEIL NELSON 4 ASSOCIATES $250 00 Paid Chk« 073033 2/25/2002 NEXUS INFORMATION SYSTEMS E 227-45500-570 Office Equip and Furnishings $3.88725 148472 HP Surestore DLT E 227-45500-570 Office Equio and Furnishings $69225 148959 UPS - Network Server ToUl NEXUS INFORMATION SYSTEMS $4,579 50 Paid Chki 073034 2/25/2002 OFFICE DEPOT E 101-41900-201 Office supplies ($3 95) 150904698 Returns E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $242 56 150928158-00 Office Supplies E 101-42110-201 Office supplies $198.47 150928158-00 Office Supplies E 10141900-201 Office supplies ($3.15) 151125284 Returns ToUl OFFICE DEPOT $43393 Paid Chk# 073035 2'25/2002 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR E 101-43000-221 Equipnient Parts 4 Accesaories $6 92 26112 Angle Iron E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts 4 Accessories $5.86 26308 11/4 Round Bar Total PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR $12.78 Paid Chk« 073036 2/25/2002 QWEST E 10141900-321 Telephone $509 79 9522494600 Phone Service E 60149400-321 Telephone $24.28 9522494600 Phone Service E 60249450-321 Telephone $56 64 9522494600 Phone Service E 10142110-321 Telephone $218 48 9522494600 Phone Service ToUl QWEST $80919 Paid ChMI 073037 2/25/2002 RELIANT ENERGY • GC E 613-49830-381 Gas 4 Electric $178.15 539004161700 (Sas Service-GC ToUl RELIANT ENERGY-GC $178.15 Paid Chk« 073038 2/25/2002 RICKS SUPERVALUE E 101-42110-437 Training 4 Development $1643 1/10/02 Training Refreshments E 613-49830-201 Office supplies $13 26 1/7/02 Salt. Ibuprofen E 613-49900-092 Sod Drinks For Resale $567 1/7/02 Cocoa for Resale ------ CITY OF ORONO Check Detail Register® 02/22A)2 9 5aAM Page 6 Total RICKS SUPERVALUE FEBRUARY 2002 Check Amt Invoice Comment $35 36 Paid Chk# 073039 2/2W002 SCHOENHOFF. JOHN E 101-42110-226 Clothing & personal equipment $76 26 021902 Uniform Shoes Total SCHOENHOFF, JOHN $76 28 Paid ChK« 073040 2/2S/2002 SNYDER DRUG STORES E 101-42110-20* Office supplies i13 89 1/14A)2 1 Hour Proc E 101-42110-201 Office supplies $4026 1/16/02 Film E 602-49450-201 Office supplies $6.91 1/16/02 Film E 101-42110-201 Office supplies $25.72 1/3A)2 Puffs. Batteries E 101-42110-201 Office supplies $824 1/3A)2 1 Hour Proc Tout SNYDER DRUG STORES $9502 Paid Chk# 073041 2/25/2002 STATE TREASURER E 101-42400-437 Training & Development $30 00 5/15A)2 2002 Codes Sem-Oavis E 101-42400-437 Training & Development $30 00 5/29/02 2002 Codes Sem-Oman Tout STATE TREASURER $60.00 Paid Chk« 073042 2/2S/2002 STEFFENHAGEN, RON E 613-49830-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $159 74 021402 Phone, Answering Machine Tout STEFFENHAGEN, RON $159 74 Paid Chki 073043 2/25/2002 T.L. STEVENS E 101-43290-510 Land $770.00 2/7/02 Abandon Well 3790 Shoreline Total T.L STEVENS $77000 Paid Chk* 073044 2/25/2002 TOLL GAS S WELDING SUPPLY E 101-43000-415 Other Equipment Rentals $6.05 490034 Cylinder Rental Total TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY $6 05 Paid Chk# 073045 2/25/2002 TREADWAY GRAPHICS E 101-42110-226 Training Supplies $5964 136153 DARE Pens A Pencils ToUl TREADWAY GRAPHICS $59 64 Paid Chk# 073046 2/25/2002 TRI STATE PUMP E 602-49450-406 Repairs/Mamt-Swr lines/tifts $410 60 20858 2" Adapters ToUl TRI STATE PUMP $41060 Paid Chk# 073047 2/25/2002 UNITED RENTALS E 101-43000-437 Training & Development $145 00 3/4/02 Work Zone Seminar Total UNITED RENTALS $145 00 PaidChk* 073048 2/25/2002 UNIVERSAL TRUCK EQUIPMENT G 227-20200 Accounts Payable $7.199 40 7300 Snow Plow - #425 Total UNIVERSAL TRUCK EQUIPMENT $7.199 40 Paid Chk# 073049 2/25/2002 VESSCOINC. E 601-49400-227 Utility System Maint. Supplies $85 39 25686 Pump Head Total VESSCOINC.$8539 Paid Chk# 073050 2/25/2002 VILLAGE CHEVROLET E 601-49400-222 Vehicle Equipment & Parts $941 359222 Cover ToUl VILLAGE CHEVROLET $9.41 ]>atd Chk« 073051 2/25/2002 WESf LAKE SALES E 101-42110-240 Small Tools and Minor Equip $276 25 2210 Fireproof File CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Registeiti^ 02/22A)2 9S8AM Page 7 FEBRUARY 2002 Total WEST LAKE SALES Cliecii Amt Invoice Comment %27B2S PeiOChki 073092 2^9/2002 WUrrERNHEIIliER, AUSSA E 101-41300-319 Other ProtiMionalSefvices Total WmrrERNHElMER.AUSSA $135 00 26 1135.00 Council Minutes • 2/11/02 PaidChki 073093 2/25/2002 XCEL ENERGY E 101-41900-361 Gas & Electric E 602-49450-361 Gas 6 Electric E 101-43000-361 Gas A Electric E 601-49400-361 Gas 6 Electric Total XCEL ENERGY $536.69 Allocation $95.16 Allocation $126 97 Allocation $516.68 Allocation $1,279.50 Electrical Service Electrical Service Electrical Service Electrical Service 10100 Primary Cash $121,990.01 CITY OF ORONO Check Detail Register® 02/2CV02 11 07 AM Page 1 FEBRUARY 2002 10100 Primary Cash Check Amt Invoice Comment Paid Chki 072974 2/20/02 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION G101-21711Credit Union $10.485 00 SAVINGS W/H & TRANSFERRED Total CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION $10485 00 PaidChk* 07297S 2/2(U02 FIRST NATIOHAL BANK Of LAKES G 101-21701Federal Withholding $9,841 36 FEDERAL W/H G 101-21703FICA Tax Withholding $4,577.99 FICA & MEDICARE W/H G 101-21703FICA Tax Withholding $4.577 99 FICA & MEDCR CITY SHARE Total FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES $18,997.34 Paid Chk« 072976 2/20/02 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 G 101-21705Other Retirement $300 00 DEFERRED COMP Total ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 $300 00 Paid Chkf 072977 2/20/02 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE G 191-21707Union Dues $56100 UNION DUES Total LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE $561 00 Paid Chk» 072978 2/20/02 MN DEPT OF REVENUE G 101-21702State Withholding $4.04145 STATE TAX W/H Total MN DEPT OF REVENUE $4,041 45 Paid Chk# 072979 2/20/02 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST G 101-21705Other Retirement $2.204 68 MN STATE RETIREMENT Total ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST $2.204 68 Paid Chk* 072980 2/20/02 PEBSCO/OBRA G 101-21705Other Retirement $231 OBRA DEFERRED COMP Total PEBSCO/OBRA $231 Paid Chk# 072981 2/20/02 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS G 101-21705Other Retirement $2.367 00 USCM - ENTITY 2339 Tout PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS $2.367 00 Paid Ch'<* 072982 2/20/02 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT G 101-21704PERA $6.784 44 PERA CITY SHARE G 101-21704PERA $5.27845 PERA EMPLOYEE W/H Tottl PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT $12.06289 Paid Chk# 072983 2/20A)2 UNITED WAY G 101-21708United Way $50 00 CHARITY DONATIONS ToUl UNITED WAY $50 00 Paid Chk# 072984 2 20/02 WISCONSIN SCTF G 101-21712Other Deductions $184 62 JOHNSON « 0002756898 Total WISCONSIN SCTF $184 62 10100 Primary Cach $51.256 29 CITY OF ORONO check register 02/22/02 9 57 AM Pagcl Cti«ck NtitnlMf Eifiploy«# Nam# 050799 DODGE. RACHEL M. 050500 JOHNSON. MARY ANN 050601 LESKINEN. DENISE M. 050802 MOORSE. RONALD J. 050603 VEE. LINDAS 050604 KUEHN. THOMAS M. 050605 OLSON. RONALD J. 050806 PETTIT. SANDRA K. 050607 ANDERSON. BRUCE L 050806 BOBZIEN. SUE A. 050609 BORIS. SCOTT W 050610 BUDIG. STACIE M. 050611 CARLSON. MICHAEL B 050612 CORNICK. JAMES L 050613 DEMBOUSKl. JAY C. 050614 ERICKSON. KURT R 050615 FARNtOK. CORREY L 050616 FISCHENICH. DAN T. 050817 FISCHER. CHRISTOPHER K. 050618 GOOD. STEPHANY R 050619 HENDRICKS, RONALD J. 050620 JOHNSON. BRADLEY P. 050621 JOHNSON. JEFFREY 050622 MADSON. ADRIENNE M. 050623 MCNALLY. STEVEN A 050824 MCNICHOLS. DAVID L 050825 MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES 050826 PERSELL. WILLIAM R 050827 SCHOENHOFF. JOHN B. 050828 TOMCHECK, UWRENCE F. 050829 TOMCZYK.MARKW. 050830 WITTKE. ANTHONY A 050831 ARNESON. JOSHUA A 050832 LEE. JOSEPH P 050833 BOLTERMAN. MATTHEW A. 050834 BOTTENBERG. WENDY C. 050635 DAVIS. MARC L 050636 GAFFRON. MICHAEL P. 050837 GAPPA. GREGORY A 050838 MEYER. WILLIAM C. 050839 OMAN. LYLE E. 050840 WEINBERGER. PAUL E 050641 BRIKKHAUS. JOHN F. 050642 DEBAERE. DONALD L 050843 GREGORY. JAMES D 050644 HANSEN. STEVEN 050645 OBERAIGNER. SCOTT G. 050646 OBRIEN. RANDY L 050647 PALMER. GREGORY A. 050648 RATHBUN. BARRY J. 050649 SKREEN. DALE S. 050650 ROSS. JOHN A. Pay P#rlod Chack Chack Amount Data Ch#ck Status S993.69 2/20/02 Outstanding $670.79 2/20/02 Outstanding $746 03 2/20/02 Outstanding $1880 2/20/02 Outstanding $1,351.11 2/20/02 Outstanding $1,032.39 2/20/02 Outstanding $78.89 2/20/02 Outstanding $459.28 2/20/02 Outstanding $501.93 2/20/02 Outstanding $736 67 2/20/02 Outstanding $1,264.66 2/20/02 Outstanding $779 25 2/20/02 Outstanding $30975 2/20/02 Outstanding $1,420.73 2/20/02 Outstanding $i.o4834 2/20/02 Outstanding $1.483 27 2/20/02 Outstanding $1.800 96 2/20/02 Outstanding $1.449 38 2/20/02 Outstanding $25287 2/20/02 Outstanding $2,040.04 2/20/02 Outstanding $57882 2/20/02 Outstanding $1,467 10 2/20A)2 Outstanding $1.172 86 2TZ0/02 Outstanding $601 00 2/20/02 Outstanding $1.356 98 2/20A)2 Outstanding $579 98 2/20/02 Outstanding $1,742.61 2/20/02 Outstanding $37665 2/20/02 Outstanding $1,442.51 2/20/02 Outstanding $31321 2/20/02 Outstanding $1,403 11 2/20/02 Outstanding $1.265 74 2/20/02 Outstanding $66991 2/20/02 Outstanding $266 86 2/20/02 Outstanding $1,060.15 2/20/02 Outstanding $1.122 84 2/20/02 Outstanding $1,331 62 2/20/02 Outstanding $1.353 01 2/20/02 Outstanding $1,771 33 2/20/02 Outstanding $581.62 2/20/02 Outstanding $153 98 2/20/02 Outstanding $1.446 73 2/20/02 Outstanding $1,319.70 2/20/02 Outstanding $1.275 72 2/20/02 Outstanding $697 91 2/20/02 Outstanding $1.137 33 2/20/02 Outstanding $75925 2/20/02 Outstanding $1,062.01 2/20/02 Outstanding $1,046.94 2/2C/02 Outstanding $1,159.06 2/20/02 Outstanding $1.12663 2/20/02 Outstanding $1654 2/20/02 Outstanding CITY OF ORONO check register 02/22Att9:S7AM Page 2 Chack Mutiibar Employaa Mama wowT cteffe ^^ Chack Amount SI,349.62 S52.248.20 Chack Data Chack StMia • -J-Tt J t— 2/204)2 Outstanding information ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING FEB 2 5 2002 CnYUhOMOwU OF . f 1111 Feb 15 2BBZ 15:31:22 Via Fax ->♦8622494616 Adninistrator T’ LMC mwimyt -Friday Fax- A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities Page BBl 0MH3 FEB 2 5 2002 i I Kjr KjnKji'^Kj February IS, 2002 State February Revenue Collections Bleak The Slate Department ot' Finance released lax collection inform'ition for Febnary and the news wasn’t good. S:a!e revenues for the month under performed the already bleak November 2001 forecast by approximately $72 million. The report could be the first glimpse what the full-blown budget forecast might reveal later this month. The February information is disconcerting given that the collection information released Just one month rjp, which included the important holiday shopping season, was actually slightly more than forecast. When the January information was released, some legislators indicated that they believed the November forecast was loo pessimistic and that the February forecast would show a turnaround in the stale’s financial situation. The dismal February figures only reflect the actual lax collections for the past month while the Febmary forecast that will be released on February 27 will be a projection of the expected revenues and expenditures for the next 16 months. Stale economist Tom Stinson has always urged people not to draw long-term conclusions from monthly collection reports. We’ll have to wail for the release of the forecast on February 27. State Hiring Freeze—^And More? On Thursday, Governor Ventura today announced that he Is imposing a stale hiring freeze as well as travel and purchasing restrictions for slate agencies. The restriction on slate hiring means current and future vacancies will not be filled unless there is an urgent or legal need to fill the position. In addition, the stale will restrict oul-of slate travel, unless approved by the commissioner of employee reb lions. Quoting the governor in a press release issued today, ’’Unfortunately the truth bwilh the inaction of the Legblature to agree on a long-term budget solution, I need to step up my effort to make reductions that do not require legbUlive action.” To announce the hiring freeze, the governor sent a teller Wednesday to stale agency heads. The letter indicated that the govetr.or expects the hiring freeze to remain in effect through the end of the year and that it could be expanded. Employees will also have to gel approval for ail oul-of-slate travel from the committioner of employee reblions. The governor’s announcement may be the first indication of how the governor could implement a budget-balancing package without the assistance of the stale legisbture. "1 would expect that other branches of government, non-executive entities, and local units of government to also act in a fiscally responsible manner," Governor Ventura said, "if there b no resolve on the part of the legbbture lo bke meaningful action, I will not hesitate lo continue additional budget reductions." The governor was referring to hb power lo “unaliol’’ expenditures, an action that could ultimately place a tremendous burden on aid programs as well as grant programs for cities across the stale. With the unallotment tool, the governor can only cut expenditures—he does not have the power to move monies from other funds into the general fund nor does he have the power to raise bxes. In other words, under unailotment, aid cub could be significantly deeper than the onerous cuts already proposed by the governor. Is unailotment more likely? The political lea leaves are difficult lo read but the governor’s comments yesterday rebled lo the hiring freeze and hb rXher strong public crilicbms of the House and Senate pbns undoubtedly makes It appear that he b at least ready lo exercise hb authority. The Senate ha completed a (dan for the current rnnbl shortfall but has done little for the siruciural deficit and the House b still at least a week or more away from completing work on their defidl package—and we haven’t even gotten lo the point of recrxiclling the differences between the two pro(x>sab. Be ready—it could certainly gel worse. Unailotment of $2 billion in stale sfiending could Iransbie into very deep municipal aid cuts indeed. Tat nm« tefoiaUtM on ciiy losliliilvo lt«M,comaciany mntm o TH m Laatva or Minnatou OK m iMMgovmoMMal RaUiiont loan. 6S1.281.1200 or 800.92S.1122 H UKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 18338 Minnetonka Blvd. Deephaven, MN 55391 (952) 745^789 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NEWSLEHER Gregoiy S. Nybeck February 8,2002 FEB 2 5 2002 I > '-'r unui^u Propoted ordinance amendment prohibitirMi the use of certain watercraft on ceitain parts of Lake Minnetonka: Since September, the LMCD Board has been considering an ordinance amendment that would prohibit the use of motorized watercraft on certain parts of Lake Minnetonka. Three areas of Lake Minnetonka have been proposed where use of motors would be prohibited. They include: 1) Six Mile Creek from the mouth of the creek upstream to the contour line at elevation 929.4' NGVD, 2) Painter's Creek west of County Road 110 upstream to the contour line at elevation 929.4' NGVD, and 3 ) Long Lake Creek from the mouth of the creek, located at the railroad trestle, upstream to the contour line at the elevation 929.4' NGVD. At subsequent Board meetings, testimony has been received from potential affected property owners that havt requested to be grandfethered or granted a non-confonning permit from the ordinance amendment if it was adopted. A Lake Minnetonka Wetlands Task Force Meeting was held on 1/16/02 to discuss this and the concept of allowing the use of electronic trolling motors in the creeks identified in the proposed ordinance amendment. Further discussion on tfiis issue is planned for the 3/13/02 Regular LMCD Board Meeting. Increased Water Patrol Presence On Lake Minnetonka: This past summer, the LMCD .vork with the member cities and the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office Water Patrol to increase law enforcement presence on Lake Minnetonka for the 2001 boating season. In late May, two additional full-time Hennepin County Sheriffs Water Patrol Deputies were assigned to Lake Minnetonka. A two-year commitment, at $100,000 per year, was requested for the program, with costs to be shared by Hennepin County (50%), LMCD Member Cities (30%), and the LMCD 'Save the Lake ’ Fund (20%). Funds were received from 13 of the 14 rnember cities for the 2001 boating season. In April, $14,000 was received from a number of Lake Minnetonka area businesses to offset funds not received from member cities. Preliminary feedback from the Hennepin County Sheriffs Office Water Patrol is that the two additional Deputies greatly enhanced their efforts in 2001. Good news relating to this project was that it came well under what was budgeted. We will be forwarding a letter in the near future to the 14 member cities that analyzes the project financially and includes feedback from Lt. Brian Johnson from the Sheriffs Water Patrol. The LMCD will be initiating plans for the project in the near future for the 2002 boating season 2002 Board Officers & Board Appointments: Discussion and action on 2002 Board Officers took place at the 1/9/02 Regular LMCD Board Meeting. Board Officers for 2002 include; Bert Foster- Chairman, Craig Nelson- Vice Chairman, Tom Skramstad- Treasurer, and Lili McMillan- Secretary. Member cities Minnetrista, Mound, Orono, Shorewood, Spring Park, and Victoria were notified this past October that their representative on the LMCD Board of Directors would expire at the end of January and that there was a need to either re-appoint the current Board member or appoint a new Board member, beginning at the first meeting in February. Discussion of these appointments is planned for the 2/13/02 Regular LMCD Board Meeting. On-goIng LIctntet/Perroite: LMCD staff is currently conducting inspections of ail licensed deicing installations on Lake Minnetonka. This has been a unique winter for deicing purposes because of the unseasonably warm temperatures. Results of these inspectkx)s, with related correspondence, will be forwarded to the licensee and affected member dty after inspections have been completed. Staff is currently processing ail new and renewal