HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-30-2002 Council Work SessionCouncil Work Session
5:30 p.m., Tuesday, July 30,2002
Orono City Council Chambers
AGENDA
1. Crystal Bay Road Lots and Docks
2. Update RE: Fire Service Issues
A. Maple Plain Fire Service Agreement
B. Long Lake Fire Service Agreement
C. Mound Fire Station
D. Fire District
3. Planning Conunission Alternates
4. Planning Commission Vice-Chair
5. City Representatives on Fire Service Commissions
6. Budget Worksession Dates
7. Big Island Neighborttood Meeting Info
8. City Hall Landscaping
9. Clarification of Ice Arena Sewer and Water Comiection Charges
10. Update RE: Highway 12 Turn Back
A. Process for development of a plan for the functionality and character of the roadway
11. Other
\k
TO: Mayor Peterson and Council Members
FROM: Ron Moorse, City Administrator
DATE: July 30.2002
SUBJECT: Maple Plain Fire Service Agreement Status
The City of Maple Plain recently provided its contracting cities with a letter officially cancelling the
current fire service contract effective January I, 2003. Maple Plain has also provided a proposed
revised contract for 2003. The proposed contract is similar to the one proposed by Maple Plain in 200 1,
regarding which the contracting cities have voiced strong concerns.
There are several significant issues that would need to be resolved before any of the current contracting
cities would enter into a fire service agreement with Maple Plain. The contracting cities will continue
to try to work out a mutually acceptable solution with Maple Plain. In the meantime, all cities are in
the process of arranging for alternative fire service delivery for those areas currently covered by Maple
Plain. For Orono, the area currently covered by Maple Plain could be adequately covered by the Long
Lake Fire Department.I
.! ■
t'
. fr
1;
J -:i.
i
f’
City of Maple Plain
Street Addnss
1620 Maple Ave.
Maple Plain, MN 55359
Mailing Address
P. O. Box 97
Maple Plain, MN 55359
July 25,2002
a
*•>
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
CityofOrono
PO Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
RE: Fire Services
Dear Mayor and Council:
2003 Fire Department Budget
Attached is the 2003 fire service budget. We are glad to tell you that the Fire Department
Operating Budget has decreased by 5.41% from last year. This is a $15,880 saving over the 2002
adjusted budget.
The Fire Department Capital Budget has increased because of the purchase of the ladder truck
that was approved by you and the other customers when Chief David Eisinger presented it to you
last year. We were fortunate to be able to secure financing for the truck from the Bank of Maple
Plain at a very favorable tax-exempt lease purchase rate. Unfortunately, the term was shorter
than we expected so the annual payment is slightly elevated. However, thanks to a diligent Fire
Department, the projected cost of the 800 MHz radio systems has been reduced by $30,000 from
what we projected and provided to you last year. So the overall Capital Budget is very close to
the projections we gave you last year. The 2003 Capital Budget is $60,700 for the ladder truck
and S1,132 for the 800 MHz radio systems.
The bottom line is that the Operating and Capital Fire Department Budget is increasing by
$1,264 over the 2002 budget.
City Costs
City costs, such as the cost of the audit, payroll costs, accounting costs, interest on the cost of
funds between when we disburse the funds and when we are paid by the customer, general city
administrative costs performed by the Clerks Office and other related costs have never been
charged to you. Over the years the City of Maple Plain has funded and absorbed these costs.
You will note in the Fire Department Operating Budget that there will be no charge to you for
professional services under the new contract as was allowed under the old contract. These costs
Telqihoiie 763-479-05 IS • Fax 763-479-0519
e-mail dtvhalKaimaoIeolaOT.com • www.maoleolaln.com
will also be absorbed by the 10% City Administrative costs. The new contract
recognizes (hat these are real service costs that should be shared. In light of this
there will be a charge of 10% of (he Fire Department Operating Budget for City
Administration costs starting in 2003.
I have provided a preliminary work sheet based on last year ’s distribution
percentages to help you estimate what your costs could be. Unfortunately, the
County is still working on the 2003 Estimated Market Values for the fire service
area but we should have those values soon. Your distribution amount will change
based on these new estimated market values. As soon as we receive the values
from the County, the staff will redo the distribution and send it to you.
The Operating Budget has several adjustments that I would like to discuss with
you.
1. The pension fund contribution has not been increased from what it was in
2002. We feel that this is a disser\ icc to our fire fighters in that we have one
of the lowest contributions in the area. We have not adjusted the payment to
the fire fighters since 2000. We decided to keep the contribution to the
pension fund the same because of the e.xtra burden it places on you our
customers. However, we will need to adjust this in the future.
2. We expect insurance to increase in 2003. Like you, we purchase insurance
from the LMC Trust. They have indicated to us that liability and property
damage insurance will increase from 4% to 7% next year. They are expecting
Workers Compensation to increase by 10%.
3. We have established a new budget category called a Replacement Repair &
Maintenance Reserve Contribution. This reserve fund is for major equipment
repairs and minor equipment replacements that are not covered by insurance.
For example this year Tanker Number 12 blew its engine and we needed to
have the engine rebuilt. In the past the City of Maple Plain has funded these
emergency costs but we were not reimbursed for your share of the
advancement of funds until after the audit up to a year and a half later or
longer. We plan to maintain this fund at about $35,000.
4. The Chief and 4 OtTicers lead the Department. We have decided to increase
the amount we pay the Chief and Officers from a total of $4,950 to a total of
$6,450. They have not received an increase since 1999, yet their
responsibilities have substantially increased during this period of time.
We have also decided to increase the amount that we pay our 23 and soon to be
24 fire fighters. This is a total increase from $48,000 to $60,000 or an average of
$500 per year for each fire fighter. Like the officers the fire fighters have not
received an increase since 1999. Although the fire fighters will be paid more per
hour per call than the other area departments, the Officers and Chief are paid less.
So the comparative costs are not substantially different. It is to the credit of the
Officers and Chief that they aic willing to take less so the fire fighters are paid
more.
The information we provided to you last year indicated that we were planning
these increases. We assume because we gave you ample time to consider the
increases that you have budgeted for them and they are not a surprise to you.
Also, we did not receive any objections last year when we presented the planned
increases to you.
You have indicated to me and the City Council that you think the level of service
from the Fire Department is excellent and you have continuously praised these
dedicated individuals for their fine service. We share this belief. It is hypocritical
to say that the ser\'ice is excellent and to praise the dedication of these fine
volunteers and then not expect to compensate them for their service. If we want
good dedicated fire fighters we need to provide some limited but real benefits.
Like all of the departments in the area we have experienced recruitment problems.
We have to provide good equipment, good training, a good pension fund and
adequate compensation if we expect to retain and recruit fire fighters. A lesser
approach to emergency ser\'ices will only result in a diminished level of this vital
scr\'ice.
Fire Scr\'ice Contract
I recently sent to you a new fire serv ice contract. We have experienced too many
problems with the 1978 contract and felt that we could avoid these problems with
this new contract. We would be glad to discuss this new very fair contract with
you. However, we are not interested in a joint ownership of the Maple Plain Fire
Department. We have given you inexpensive ser\'ice for decades; at a
comparative cost less than you could receive from any other fire department and
at a cost much less than you could provide the same level of service yourself. We
have brought you into our planning and budgeting process and the Chief has been
forthright about the future needs asking you about them and getting your verbal
approval before major purchases occurred. You have asked us to keep our cost as
low as w’e can and we have respected your budget situation and actually reduced
the Fire Department Operating Budget this year and kept the entire budget very
reasonable.
We are willing to continue budget discussions with you before we have to certify
the budget to the County. If there are any areas where we can reduce costs
without reducing the level of service or absorbing the cost that should be shared,
we would be glad to discuss them with you.
I tfWkJ n -■llA lrt.1P.ArLH
Terminatins Existing Contract
I have attached a resolution from the City Council terminating the existing
contract. This is required before we can enter into a new contract. We are hoping
that you see clear and remember the flne level of service that you are and would
be receiving by dedicated fire fighters when you enter into a new contract with the
City of Maple Plain.
sincerely.
laA Vigoren, Ma
ity of Maple Plai
Enclosures; Revised Budget, Resolution terminating the existing contract
CC: Fire Chief
City Administrator
- XJ-------
r'
Maple Plain Fire Depaftment
OPERATINO BUDGET
7/24m
ACCOUNT
NO*S ACCOUNT
2W2
ADJUSTFD BUDGET
2M3
BUDoer
4??10
101
tos
l?4
ISI
?QI
203
3K
303
322
3il
3S3
499
RRE AOMMSnUTION
Sataiy CM and Oacsft
8a cwiia iy8anno»
riCACiMMaCM AOaotft
Fm PitniiQn ConliilMibun
Nkturafica * Workoit Comp
oaotSuppkot
rMwIFonntABoolit
RmoiM Toting A Roauri
rMMtional Sofvioot
pDtIago Cipofito
lafofonca - Gonoiol Liab%
Intufonoo - AiOomuM
Mrtcoionooot
AoooMni Total
M9S0
12 000
UMO
136.960
UlOO
11600
ten
tssoo
t2?n
I2S
•17S0
I8.SO0
I24 370
16.450
12.000 Contract no FICA
$493 7 6M
$36,068 City A Est Ini. ConfriMlQn
$2,116
$400
$400
$5,500
$0 Note: Paid not budQoted
$200
$1,673
$14,205
$5,000
42220
103
nREflGHTINQ
Solanat A Wdgot Firo Fightan
122 FICA Exponta run Fi^yaoff
216
216
740
499
sao
Opofoiont Eipont e
Suppiai/Qiofmcaif
Tacicol Inif^'raiiKi GirM
Mitceteftoeus
Otaac aqiapmcMil
194 834 8/S696 Souroa: aH IniMranoa; LMC
Alln94irancaincraBiad7%.¥0C 10%
Laddar Iruck addad Id aulo insurancA
848000 $60,000
to $4,500 7.65%
ti.soo $200
tl.OOU $1,000
13000 $10,000
8*^400 $600
816000 $12,000 NolaJnciydMfurfioulaMr
$3,000 Nola.ConIribulidn lo Raiarva Fundr'lviiwwtwili rw r wm^
AocouniTatal 8103.900 891 190
42230 FV€PREVEf4TION
203 riodid Foimt A BooAt 1400 $600
311 GoocM/Educoaon 8200 $1,200
362 MAcIntomiaaon 81.100 $1,000
499 Mwcainnaouf 8160 $200
AoxniN Total 81860 83.0U0
42240 nRETRANt40
208 Tiammg A bnt 81.000 $2,000
331 Tftatal Contatnnca School 16600 $3,000
433 Duat A Subtcnpiont 81.200 $1,200
499 MucnOanaoiii 8400 $400
680 OM aqiapmafa 8300 $300
Account Total 89 400 01900
AirPacItt
Pi«a1or2
4?7S0 f 84E COMMUriCATK04S
221 Rapaa a Moiwienenco 1500 $500
m Radm 4 Pagart 12.500 $3,000
410 EguipmaiiiRanidi 94.000 $8,000
499 4Hoa8Moiit 1200 $200
sao 02Wf MMlflM 9500 $300
Account Total 97.800 912.000
422S0 FftE REPAW SCRVICt
212 MotorFual4Lub«91200 $2,000
221 RapoN to Eqiapment 92.000 $2,000
240 Smoa Took 4 Moiof Eqiopmafa 11.500 $1300
RaptacamaatRapaa 4 Momitfiaiica
404 924000 $35300
499 MtfcaOanaout 9200 $200
SOO CacNhUOuley 92 000 $2,000
AccouniTotal 928.900 942700
C270 FWE MEDICAL SERVICE
215 Suppaof 91.000 91.000
221 Rapaa4Mawtanaaca 9500 1500
240 Smal Toola 4 Mmkm Ettupmant 9500 9500
499 MitcaManaout 9100 9100
500 OaiMiaiOiilav 91500 91.500
AcoounlToiol 93500 91500
42200 F41E STATION BUtDMG
211 91.000 $1,000
223 94 000 $4,000
302 JoiMtofSafvioB 9000 $1,000
321 Talaptwjna 92.000 $2300
352 iMiaanca • PropefV 91.250 $406
301 ElKiiclMV 91250 $4,000
383 GasUMiy 91000 $5300
384 RalutaOitpotal 9150 $150
401 DimMoq bnpffa^manit 91250 $1,250
520 Capool Oolay^ldQ bnpiouamafiit 920000 $22,747 1
Fm Dopt.2003
Accoiinl Total msoo •42.eSJ
Total Opofotoig eud9oi l?779»541%Pigo2o(2
CAPITAL BUDGET
Loddof Tiyck Loom Po^frawl
800MKiR«lK»t
2005
FoyHMm
$00,700 TaxEwfiipi lOyoaf taasai^uidyda
$1,132 AuumastwomofOKspaynienl
Total CapOil iHvififova $44,002
$330,00$
$01,032
$3M.rn O^kioiiaao
Distribution Work Shoot
2003 2002
Budget $339,770 $336,506
City Administrative Co«*10.00%$27,794 $0
Total $367,564 $338,506
Cradte:
Insuruace $19,368 $20,382
Hennepin County Park*$1,500 $1,500
Total Credit*$20,868 $21,862
2001 Increase
percentage Over 2002
Amount to be disthbuted $346,696 $316,624
Orono 13.3720%$46,360 $42,339 $4,021
Mimetista 76110%$26,387 $24,098 $2,289
Medina 1.4690% $5,093
$4,651 $442
Independence 44.7620%$155,188 $141,727 $13,461
Maple Plain 32.7840%$113,661 $103,802 $9,859
Independence Credit
Total BuMing Costs $42,853 $39,250
Independence Share $19,182 $17,569
Independence
Atiliusted Distribution
Amount $136,006 $124,158 $11,848
Maple Plain A^justsd
Distribution Amount $132,843 $121,371 $11,472
Nott indeptndenc* credit* ere the reeuR of the egieement (or PoKce Service* biidng rent
2001 dietnbutton percentage* are used we should have the 2002 percentage* titorliy
.. fi
O J
Member Bliss
and moved its adoption;
introduced the following Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. 02-0723-1
A RESOLUTION TERMINATING THE CONTRACTS FOR
FIRE PROTECTION BETWEEN MAPLE PLAIN
AND ITS FIRE SERVICE CUSTOMERS
WHEREAS, Maple Plain has been providing fire protection services for the cities of
Independence, Medina, Orono, Minnctrista and the Hennepin County Park Reserve District under
the terms of a fire service contract dating back to 1978; and
WHEREAS, Maple Plain has prepared new fire protection service contracts for each of the
above contracting entities and has provided each contracting city with a copy of the new contract for
execution; and
WHEREAS, the new contract, by its terms, will take effect January 1,2003; that the existing
contract must be terminated on or before August 1,2002 or it automatically renews for calendar year
2003;and
WHEREAS, Maple Plain must cancel the existing fire service contracts so that there is no
overlap in contract terms.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE MAPLE PLAIN CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS;
1 The existing fire service contracts between Maple Plain and the cities of
Independence, Medina, Orono, Minnetrista and the Hennepin County Park Reserve
Distnet are hereby canceled.
Effective date of said cancellation is December 31,2002.
3.The City Clerk is directed to serve written notice of said cancellation on all
contracting parties prior to August 1,2^2.
A
Dated: July 23, 2002
ATTEST:
Clerk
The nr otion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by Member
l^rch ttpon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Vlgoren, Bliss, Kurch sod
and the following voted against the same: Sweeney
whereupon said Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
-2-
■'T . -A . •
at•! >.
• ‘ -I .
1
i
Mapto Ptaln FIra Dapartmmt
Draft OPERATtNG BUDGET
7/2MQ
ACCOUNT
HOtS ACCOUNT
^2210
103
106
122
124
151
201
203
306
307
322
361
363
409
IINIStklATlONFIRE/
Salary Chial and Olhcar s
Sacralary Sarvica
FICA Expanta Chial 6 Officars
Fira Paniion ContribuUon
Insuranca • Worfcars Comp
Olica Suppliaf
Prinlad Forms ft Books
Parsonnal Tasting & Recruit
Professional Services
Postage Expanse
InsuraiKa • General liability
Insuranca • Automoliva
Miscallanaous
Account Total
42220
103
122
215
216
240
499
580
580
FIRE FIGHTING
Salaries 6 Wages Fire Fighters
FICA Expanse Fire Fighters
Operations Expanse
Supplies/Chamicals
Tactical Imp/Protact Gear
Miscallanaous
Other aquipmant
Replacamant Air Pac Contribution
Account Total
42230
203
331
352
499
FIRE PREVENTION
Printed Forms & Books
GoodMIl/ Education
Public Information
Miscallanaous
Account Total
42240
206
331
433
499
500
FIRE TRAINING
Training ii Inst.
Travel. Conference^ School
Dues 6 Subscriptions
Miscallanaous
Other equipment
Account Total
1999
ACTUAL
AJUU
ACTUAL
iMIl
BUDGET BUDGET PROMSEO BUDGET
$5,550 00 $2,47500 $4,950 $4,950 10,450
2.405.00 2.20500 $2,500 $2,000
$2,000 Canirad no FICA
525.18 2.75357 $4,500 K500 $493 7.9S%
40.86S.00 35,63400 $16,000 $17,600
$33,500 InereaM bMauM kwitimnD
1,19880 1.347.00 $2,100 $1,924 $2,116
1,500.35 1,579.30 $1,500 $1,600 $400
336.66 117.70 $300 $400 $400
1.096 36 3.86100 $5,500 $5,500 $5,500
$9,500 $2,211 $0 Neta:To be Inckida In othara Budget
5741 4.00 $125 $25
$200 Md MM M a 10% aiy chiiBt to ewtonwn
1.501.00 1,57500 $1,750 $1,750 $1,873 lOtoMIncludaaooounltoo,
6,50000 8.10900 $8,400 t8.50Q_$14,295 legal. audg,coneulard and dyadmlnMMIen
464 48 1.569.69 370^$5,000
T 62.003.24 61,230.26 $$>.1^5 i75,330 ~i?2.228 Source: al Insurance: LMC
Al tnauranea tocmaad 7%. WC10%
Ladder truck added lo auto kiBuranoa
i 13.855 88 %33,871.78 $47,050 $48,000 $80,000
$•$0 $4,590 7.65%
2.510,50 1.250 00 $2,750 $1,500 $200
000 000 $800 $1,000 11.000
16.91822 13.46971 $7,000 $10,000
1.544 05 67639 $300 C$3S.4QqJ::7 $400
76.67252 2.952 46 $15,000 $15,000 $12,000 Nola:lnckidas turn aid gear
$3,000 Nola.'ConMbidlQlntaReiarviFand
T"111,501 iT 52.220 34 $72,966 $107,900 $91,lte tor Mura pufchaai AlrPaeba
$71771 $•$400 $400
$800
0.00 0.00 $200 $200 $1,200
0.00 1.16891 $1,000 $1,100 $1,000
24000 000 $100 $150
T 957.) 1 T 1.16891 li.>6o $1,850 $i.oo6
95000 $1,000 $2,000
$3.98401 $3.890.70 $6,500 $6,500
$3,000
3,289.81 1.726.00 $1,100 $1,200 $1,200
24266 501.38 $100 $400 $400
397 75 0.00 $300 $300 $300 Paialaf
7:914 23 $18.000
r-
42250 fm£C0MfyKINtCATI0HS
221 RcfiMr it Maintafi«nc«$49581 $408 22 $500 $500 $500
323 RidioftPagtri 2,287.24 1.34018 $2,600 $2,600 $3,000
410 EquifMiitnl RtnItI 1.665.70 1.430.09 $4,000 $4,000 $8,000
499 Miictlliniouf 000 000 $150 $200 $200
580 Othtr •QuifMnant 000 000 $500 $500 $300
Account Tolit i 4.44875 i 3.178 49 i7.7$0 i>.800 $12,000
42260 FIRE REPAIR SERVICE
212 Motor Fuol it Lubt $1.693 50 $2,319.34 $2,700 $3,200 $2,000
221 Ref>oir to £(|uipmont 3.29566 240 46 $1,200 $2,000 $2,000
240 SmaM Tools it Minor Equipmtnl 64 50 1.067 88 $500 $1,500 $1,500
Roplactmcnt Repair & Mainttnanco
^$3sm.404 Rastfva Contribution 15.17285 4,81948 $9,000 $20,000
499 MiKfllanaoui 27 56 57325 $100 $200
580 Capital Outlay 4.26000 1,65000 $1,000 $2,000 $2,000
Account Total i 24.51407 i 10.670 41 $14.^$28,900 $42,700
42270 FIRE MEDICAL SERVICE
215 Supplies $000 $400 88 $150 $1,000 $1,000
221 Rei^ir it Maintenance 80 56 000 $200 $500 $500
240 Small Tools it Minor Equipment 0.00 000 $200 $500 $500
499 MIsceltanfous 000 33 87 $50 $100 $100
580 Capital Outlay 000 2.50000 $500 $1,500 $1,500
Account Total i 80 56 $2.934 75 ll.ioo $3,600 i3.600
42280 FIRE STATION BUILDING
211 Ctaanmf Supplies %27046 $753 02 $200 $1,000 $1,000
223 Building Maintenance it Repairs 537855 3004 55 $3,000 $4,000 $4,000
302 Janitor 230 719.43 $600 $800 11.000
321 lelephone 116319 1164.16 $1,300 $2,800 12.800
362 Insurance • Property 1041 1097 $1,250 $1,250
$406
381 Electric Utility 2781.66 280003 $3,000 $3,250 KOOO
381'Gas Utility 2541 21 3905.41 $4,500 $5,000 $5,500
384 Reluse Disposal 13.94 47.34 $110 $150 $150
401 Building Improvements 0 0 $1,000 $1,250 $1,250
520 Capital Outlay-Bldg Improvements 7225 14366 68 $17,500 $20,000
$22,747 1
Account Total i 20.64501 i 27,857^2 $32,460 $39,5oO $42.8^
Total Operating Budget $232,065 $166,329 $195,535 $274,280 $274,470
RrtDi^
0.07% DicfiMi Pi0t2of3
4
FIraDtpl
Draft CAPITAL BUDGET
Ladder Truck Lease
800 MH2 Radios
Cost
$585,000
$50,000
Total CapICal Improvements
Total Fire Department Budget
200$
Payment
$60,700 Tax Exempt 10 yeer leaae/jpurchaae
$1,132 Assumes tMornoriths payment
on radios
$61,832
|8$5.000
coy Administrative Cost
Includes Legal accl.audd.consullant
CNy admin costs
Total Cost of Fire Services
10.00% of Fire Depaitment
Operating Budget
Audit Is est at $1,500
$$36,303
$27,447
22 61% Increase
$292,280 $363,750 24.45% Increase
ESTIMATED REVENUES
State Aid Insurance Fund
Hennepin County Park Resent
Tax Levy aR Cities
$18,500
$1,500
$316,624
$20,826
$1,500
$341,423 7.83% Increiie
Page3of3
^ >
.VW. V t ^ W
. ji' ' '4r'
Mayor Peterson and Council MembersTO:
FROM: Ron Moorse, City Administrator
DATE: July 30.2002
SUBJECT: Long Lake Fire Service Agreement
hi
f
Additional Language-Long Lake Fire Service Agreement
Background
The Cities of Medina and Orono have been very pleased with the quality of service provided by the
City of Long Lake and the Long Lake Fire Department. In entering into a twenty year agreement
for fire service, Orono and Medina need to be assured they will receive high qiiality, cost-dlective,
fire service throughout the term of the agreement, and that the agreement clearly sets out the
responsibilities and accountabilities regarding ensuring service quality and cost-effectiveness. The
delivery of fire service in the west Hennepin County area is currently a subject of considerable
interest and concern. The key concern is the effective management of fire service costs. Orono and
Medina encourage Long Lake to take a proactive approach to the management of the Long Lake Fire
Department, particularly the management of the Department's financial affairs, to enable and ensure
continued high quality, cost-effective fire service.
Administrative/Managerial Oversight
The primary interests of Orono and Medina, in relation to fire service and this service agreement,
are high quality fire protection and medical rescue ser\ ices, and efficient and effective management
of the fiscal affairs and operations of the Fire Department. The City of Long Lake has the
responsibility of overseeing the Fire Department to ensure these primary interests are met.
Quality of Oversight Impacts Orono
Although the Long Lake Fire Department is operated by the City of Long Lake, whatever occurs in
relation to the administration of the Fire Department has a profound effect on Orono in a number of
ways.
1. The LLFD serves the largest portion of Orono, If the administration of the Fire Department has
an impact on the ability of the Department to provide high quality, cost-effective fire service, this
has a significant impact on Orono.
2. Orono is the largest customer of the LLFD, and pays the majority of the costs for both
operations and capital needs of the Department. If the financial affairs of the Fire Department are
not being managed properly or elTectively, the burden of this deficiency falls primarily on Orono.
3. If the administration of the Fire Department results in the creation of liabilities that have
financial implications, these also could have a substantial negative impact on Orono.
Fire Department Responsibility and Accountability
To provide the structure necessary' to ensure the proper and effective administration of the fiscal
affairs and operations of the LLFD, the Long Lake City Council shall put in place, as of the effective
date of this agreement, a Fire Ordinance that requires the following:
1. The Fire Chief is responsible and accountable to the Long Lake City Administrator and City
Council.
2. The Long Lake firefighters are responsible and accountable to the City of Long Lake as City
employees.
3. The policies and procedures required of the operating departments of the Cities of Long Lake
and Orono in relation to purchasing, personnel administration, and operations shall be tq)plied to the
Long Lake Fire Department.
If an officer or employee of the Long Lake FD takes an action that is outside of the policies and
procedures referenced in the Fire Ordinance, the Cities of Orono and Medina will have no
responsibility, obligation, or liability in relation to the action.
Any changes to the Fire Ordinance subsequent to the effective date of this agreement shall require
the approval of the Cities of Orono and Medina.
Long Lake Responsibility and Accountability
When the City of Long Lake, after written notification from the City of Orono and/or Medina of
concerns regar ding problems/deficiencies in service, budget management, and/or operations,
including failure to follow the policies and procedures regarding purchasing, budget management,
personnel administration, and general operations that have been set out and/or referenced in the Fire
Ordinanc e, does not adequately enforce its policies, procedures and standards ofoperation in relation
to the Fire Department; Orono and/or Medina may, subject to a showing of cause and a 4/5ths vote
of the City Council, require the Long Lake City Council to take necessary action to enforce the
policies, including disciplinary action against the Fire Chief and/or other ofllcers of the Department,
up to and including suspension or termination. If the City of Long Lake fails to take the necessary
action, the failure will be a breech of this agreement.
Financial Oversight
All revenues received, and all expenditures made, by the LLFD, including those related to donated
revenues (the "Special Fire Fund") both operating and capital, shall be budgeted and accounted for
through the City of Long Lake financial system.
All capital expenditures, whether funded through revenues from the Cities, or through revenues
from donations or other sources, i.e. expenditures from the "Special Fire Fund", must be approved
by a sufficient number of cities to reflect 60% of the regular cost allocation.
The annual audit of the Fire Department financial records, which is accomplished as part of the
regular city audit process, shall include an audit of the financial records of the Fire Relief
Association.
Due Diligence
The final approval of this agreement shall be conditioned upon the review and acceptance, by the
Cities of Orono and Medina, of the items on the Due Diligence Request List. The Cities of Orono
and Medina are not responsible or liable for any commitment not listed as part of Long Lake ’s
response to the Due Diligence request list.
Due Diligence Request List
1. List of all current capital equipment
A. Equipment purchased prior to 1993
1
i-
1.
i
f
B. Equipment purchased in 19993 or later
2. List of all current commitments related to the LLFD that will cany into any portion of the term
of this agreement.
3. An actuarial analysis regarding the funding of firefighter pensions at the current benefit level.
4. Three year detailed accounting of Special Fire Fund revenues and expenditures.
5. Three year detailed projection of Special Fire Fund revenues and expenditures.
6. An audit of the Long Lake Fire Relief Association financial records for 2001, including the
"Special Fire Fund".
Fire District
Background
As the cities of the western Hennepin County area have begun to see substantial increases in the cost
of fire service, and particularly as the medium and long range plans of the area fire departments show
escalating costs for equipment and facilities, a substantial number of cities have decided to begin the
process of exploring the feasibility of establishing an area-wide fire service district. The cities
currently involved are:
Independence
Medina
Minnetonka Beach
Minnetrista
Mound
Orono
Spring Park
Other cities who may be approached to participate include:
Delano
Long Lake
Loretto
St. Boni
Wayzata
As Medina and Orono both receive fire service from multiple fire departments, the concept of a fire
service district appears to offer a number of advantages in terms of managing fire service costs over
the long term. We encourage Long Lake to participate in the fire district process.
Proposed Contract Language:
This agreement may be renegotiated or terminated if a majority of the cities in the western Hennepin
County suburban area approve, or have developed a plan for, the establishment of a fire district for
the provision of fire service to the area.
m i
TO;
FROM:
DATE:
Mayor Peterson and Council Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
July 30.2002
/r
SUBJECT: Planning Commission Alternates
The Council, at its July 22 meeting, interviewed four Planning Commission Alternate candidates. They
were:
“Nancy Moe
“Stepl^ie Zugschwert
“Jule Hanneford
“Rick Windenburg
i
I r
1
I
' i
i
i
TO: Mayor Peterson and Council Members
FROM: Ron Moorse, City Administrator
DATE: July 30,2002
SUBJECT: Planning Commission Vice-Chair
The Planning Commission has requested that the Council appoint a vice-chair.
TO;
FROM:
DATE:
Mayor Peterson and Council Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
July 30,2002
SUBJECT: City Representatives on Fire Service Commissions
The Cities of Long Lake and Mound both have Fire Service Commissions that meet periodically to
review issues related to fire service provision. Currently, the City’s fire commission representatives
are Mayor Peterson and Council member Sansevere. Council members Sansevere and Murphy are
proposing that Jim Murphy be appointed as representative to the fire commissions in place of Bob
Sansevere. Because the original appointments were made by resolution, the change in representation
requires an amended resolution. If the Council is in support of the change, a revised resolution will be
brought to the next regular Council meeting.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Mayor Peterson and Council Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
July 30,2002
SUBJECT: Budget Workscssion Dates
Potential budget worksession dates are as follows: (meeting times are 5:30 p.m.)
Tuesday, August 13 or Thursday, August IS
Tuesday, August 27 or Thursday, August 29
Tuesday, September 3, or Thursday, September 5
For the dates in August, the Thursday evenings may work better than Tuesdays since the preceding
Mondays are Council meeting nights.
i
CITY OF ORONO - MUNICIPAL OFHCES
Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Mailing Address: P.O.Box 66
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
You are in> ited to a
Neighborhood Meeting
especially for
BIG ISLAND PROPERTY OWNERS
An opportunity to vbit with City staff
about issues affecting Big Island.
Date:Wednesday, August 7,2002
Time:7:00 - 9:00 p.m.
Place:Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway
(NE corner of Highway 12 and Old Crystal Bay Road)
Agenda: At the request of a number of Big Island property owners, the City is hosting an informal
neighborhood meeting to discuss a variety of issues that affect Big Island and its residents. Topics for
potential discussion include (but are not limited to):
►
►
►
►
On>site sewage treatment & disposal
Lake access points & use of internal roads and trails
Property’ maintenance
Zoning regulations
Public safety
You name it!
This is an opportunity to talk with your neighbors and City staff about the unique aspects and
challenges of *life on Big Island*. We*d like to hear your thoughts and views on what makes
Big Island a wonderful place and how we can work together to keep it that way!
For further Information or if you have any questions, please contact
Planning Director Mike Gaffron or Septic Systems Inspector Matt
Bolterman at the City Offices (952) 249-4600.
Fax (952)249-4616 www.cLorono.mn.ns
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Mayor Peterson and Council Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator jB//^
7 'July 30,2002
SUBJECT: Orono Ice Arena Sewer and Water Connection Charges
There is a difference in understanding between the Orono Ice Arena and City staff regarding action
taken by the Council related to the sewer and water connection charges for the Ice Arena. In 1998,
the Ice Arena was charged $101,880 for its connection to the Highway 12 area sewer and water system.
The City agreed to a payment schedule that allowed the charges to be paid over a four year period
beginning in 1999, and ending in 2002.
In February of2000, the Council changed the sewer and water connection charges from a per-unit fee
to a per-acre fee. This substantially reduced the connection charges. The Council directed staff to
recalculate the connection charges for the Ice Arena based on this change. Since the Ice Arena had
already paid a portion of the connection charges, staff recalculated the charges based on the remaining
unpaid balance. The Ice Arena understood the full original amount of the connection charges was to
be recalculated. Although there was some discussion about this difference in understanding at some
point after the Council’s action, it was not resolved at that time. This issue recently resurfaced when
the City sent the final connection charge invoice to the Ice Arena. The Ice Arena believed it had already
paid the recalculated charges in full. The unpaid amount is $7,245.58.
In order to resolve this difference in understanding, the Council needs to clarify whether the full amount
of the connection charges are to be recalculated, rather than recalculating the charges based on the year
2000 remaining balance.
1
ORONO ICE ARENA, INC.
SEWER AND WATER CONNECTION FEE
12 UNITS @ S8.490 PER UNIT AS PER THE 1996 FEE SCHEDULE
TO BE PAID OVER 5 YRS WITH INTEREST @ 6.00H PER ANNUM
INTEREST BEGINNING 2/1/97, FIRST PAYMENT DUE 2/1/97
SCHEDULE REVISED TO 4 YRS BEGINNING 2/1/98
Due date
Feb 1.1998
Unpaid Frine
Febniarv 2nd
$101,880.00
Principal
$0.00
Interest ______.Total Due
AcV36S
Int/dav
« Installment unpaid$6,112.80 $0.00 $6.112 80
Nov 12,1998 --4,756.26 (10.330.00)319.06 paid 11/12/98
Dec 31.1998 —-820.62 —1,139.68
Feb 1.1999 76,410.00 25.470.00 535.92 (27.145.60)0.00 paid 02/02/99
DecJl. 1999 --4,170.10 Ml 4.I70.IO •
Feb 1.2000 50,940.00 23.470.00 414.50 (30.034.60)0.00 paid 02/01/00
’ Feb 2a, 2000 otii amced ~«dj (44,290.00)—••
Dec 31.2000 --361.69 —361.69
Feb 1.2001 0.00 6,650.00 33.89 ••7.245.58
Dec 31.2001 —-—
Feb 1.2002 ----—
Total $57,590.00 $17,405.78 ($67.750.20) $7.245.58
Fund 671
Due date
Feb 1, 1998
Unpaid Phnc
Febniarv 2nd
$64,356.00
1989 Water (12 upits @ $$J63 « $64356)63.17%
Principa!
$0.00
Interest
$3,861.36
Payment
$0.00
Nov 12,1998
Total Due
$3,861.36 <
3,004.45
Dec3l, 1998
(6,664.44)
Installment unpaid
518.38
201.37 paidll/l2>98
Feb 1, 1999
719.75
48,267.00 16,089.00 338.54
Dec 31. 1999
(17,147.30)
2,634.19
<0.00) paid 02/02/99
Feb 1,2000_______
Feb 28,2000 ord anciid
32,178.00 16,089.00
2,634.19
261.83 (^18,985.02)
- adj (28,473.00)
(0.00) paid 02/01/00
Dec 31,2000 354.81
Feb 1,2001
354.81
0.00 3.705.00 21.41
Dec3l,2001
4,081.22
Feb 1^ 2002
Total $.35.883.00 $10,99497 ($42.796.763 $4.081.21
Due date
Feb 1. 1998
Fund6SI__________1989 Sewer (12 Units @ 83^127 « $37,524)
Unpaid Princ
February 2nd Principal Interest Payment
$37,524.00_________$0.00 $2,251.44 $0.00
36.83%
Nov 12, 1998 (1)1,751.81
Total Due
$2,251.44 < Installment unpaid
Dec 31,1998
(3,885.56)
302.25
117.69 paid 11/12/98
Feb 1, 1999
Dec31,1999
419.94
28,143.00 A381.00 197.36 (9,998.30)
1,535.91
(0.00) paid 02J0V99
Feb 1,2000_______
Feb aa, 2000 erdaMd
18.762.00 9,381.00
1,535.91
152.67
» adj (15417.00)
(11,069.58)(0.00) paid02A)l/00
Dec 3L 2000 206.88
Feb 1,2001 0.00
206.88
2,945.00 12.48
Dec 31,2001
Feb 1,2002 '
3,164J6
Total S2L707.00 $6.410.79 ($24.953.443 $3.164.35
Totaoowfici\iMMiii.m