The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03-25-2002 Council Work SessionL TO:Mayor Peterson and Council Members Pa^, Open Space and Trails Commission FROM: DATE: Ron Moorse, City Administrator March 20,2002 SUBJECT: Joint Conncil/Parks, Open Space and Traib Commbtion Worlucssion I have attached an agenda for the March 25 joint worksession, as well as a memo from the Parks, Open Space and Trails(P.O.S.T.) Commission to the Council setting out the Conunission’s proposed talking points for the worksession. 1 have included on the agenda a discussion of philosophy, vision, and priorities. Because the Council and P.O.S.T. Commission have such a small number of opportunities to meet, it is important that a portion of the worksession be devoted to looking at the big picture, and discussing how the Council and Conunission can best woric together to determine priorities and provide funding for the agreed upon priorities. Joint Council/Park Commission Workscssion 5:30 p.m., Monday, March 25,2002 Orono City Council Chambers AGENDA 1. Parks, Open Space, and Trails Commission short term paric improvement goals 2. City philosophy, vision, and priorities for parks, open space, and trails A. Parks clement of Comprehensive Community Management Plan B. Park Survey C. Roles of Council and Parks, Open Space and Trails Commission 3. Other March. 2M2 To:Mayor A City Council Members From:Andrew McOemnott. Chairperson & Commissioners Orono’s Park, Open Space and Trail Commisston Subject:Talking Points for March 25.2002 Work Session 5:30 P.M. / j' Park. Open Space and Trail Commission's short term Park Improvement Goals and Objectives for 2002. , Hackberry - Replace play equipment • to be done by Contractor, Paid for by Park Dedication Fees 1. 2. 0 ♦ ^ Ua •N 3. 4. s V Old Crystal Bay Park • Remove Crystal Road asphalt, place topsoil and seed - work done by city staff ^' and paid for by park maintenance funds. A ^ j* • Cap monitoring wells (violation)- to be paid for by city funds ^ - Relocate existing split rail fence along Crystal Ave to Brown Road - to be accomplished by cify staff Navarre Park - Install drinking fountain - to be done by city staff - Place concrete pad and fence for accessible porta potty - paid for by city maintenance funds - Place picnic table on a concrete pad - paid for by city maintenance funds - Spread topsoil & seed or sod lower portions of the park • paid for by city maintenance funds - Sidewalks • State Aid $$ ■y Priority 1 Install sidewalks along 19 from Lyric to Livingston including the driveway cut for alley at Livingston and 50 to 75 feet along Lyric - State Aid $$ ^ Priority 2 Install sidewalks along 19 from Livingston to Crystal Place including the driveway cut next to the upholstery shop. A' Lakeshore Access Points - Survey 1/3rd and mark property comersll! - Encroachments by new neighbors, most since last summer. Fox Street, the dty appears to be the recipient of four 6 to 8 foot tall pine trees. The trees completely block the entry to this access. Casco Circle: The new resident we think is using this access as their boat storage area. Crystal Bay Road/Bayview: The new neighbors are using this as their boat storage area. -1- Ft £ I 5.Lareon Sohn Park the property from 15 to Northern Ave. ‘ Slil ^ property & plant wildflower seeds on all disturbed 01*63$ B a * Grade and fill In between Larson & Sohn - - Install a yard hydrant ■ ^^rid raising for Ice Rink - goal Operating Winter 2002*2003 S'.iSJr p!?rif orily) are within one miie of thePark or more than 2.200 men women and children. mSS^fthis^palk residential lots are within one 6.Seven Nations Park to be a passive park, with trail connections to Old ^tal Bay Road to the west and the Thoroughbr^ development to the east. The neighborhood met with members of the commission several times. When developing a park that met both the neighbors wishes and the Cities objectives. Other Issues 7.Hockey Boards Free If the city transports and a citizen or the city picks up travel expenses 8,Update 2000 Capital Improvement Policy We are not spending enough to justify Park Dedication Fees! 9.Dog Park Saga Hill or Larson/Sohn -User fee - CSO could do enforcement 10. Western Metro Park Budgets 11. Golf Course - Status of funding study - Transfer Golf Course oversight to Park Commission -2- j i,» .m- *->- •. ■ 15. • • • • Fund Raising We should establish an endowment fund just for park improvements. Is it okay to ask for cash donations from citizens? Pull Tab status? We want to develop a brochure to solicit donations for park Improvements Have available a standard bench with armrests placed on a concrete slab with a brass plate and a set cost for it so citizens can purchase one to memorialize or recognize an individual, business or family. Cost approximately $1.00041.500 Small Tree with granite or brass marker, crab apple ect $250.00 Large Tree with a granite or brass marker $500.00 13. Wildlife Disturbance Letter to neighbors or newsletter articles about Dogs in French Creek Friends of the Park Awards, for 2001 ? Name New Parks Lurton - Possible Name Lurton Park Carlson - Crystal Creek Park Larson Sohn - Langdon Park ???? Tree Trust, Hennepin County work crews or City Staff to do buckthorn removal at Saga Hill. Highlarxl Seven Nations, French Creek. 17. Dakota Rail Bike Trail 18. Raise taxes for parks and b’sils -3- ..z City of Orono Improvements for Parks, Open Space and Trails Date: April 1.2030 revised: March 2002 Facility Name: Roberta Lee Antoine Park Type of Facility: Mini-Park Improvements General Recommendation: Antoine consists of a modem play facility and little else. The rest of the park has no apparent purpose, or facilities. It is not conducive even for a stroll. The topography and lack of detail make the park look like an unused building lot. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Develop a master plan walking paths and landscaping to create a park feel, rather than an empty, unused space. Construct a gazebo/picnic shelter to take advantage of the lake views and construct accessible (handicap) paths from parking area to the playground and to the picnic shelter. Replace gravel under play equipment with a recycled rubber cushioned surface or treated wood chips to provide access for persons with disabilities to all play equipment. Install posts and a net for volleyball. Install an ornamental fence to define the entire park Install security light. Landscape park especially area around sign. Construct a Va court basketball court Replace play equipment, installed in 1997, in 2018 Erect an interpretive plaque to recognize. Roberta Lee Antoine Neighborhood requests; Replace the building removed by city in 1997. Residents would like a picnic shelter (consider screening it in) and warming house for ice skating. Facility Name: Bederwood Park Type of Facility: Neighborhood Park Improvements General Recommendation: 1. Landscape park and especially area around sign 2! Expand and pave the parking lot and separate it from the Luce Line Trail. Page 1 of 10 1 • , •1 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Designate accessible parking stalls. Construct accessible paths (ADA) from parking lot to play equipment and to picnic tables and ball field. Upgrade and/or replace play equipment in 2010 Add additional picnic tables Construct a soccer field Build permanent all season toilets Construct a combination tennis court basketball and handball wall Neighborhood requests Construct a Vt court basketball court Faciiity Name Carmen Street Fishing Pii^r Type of Facility: Lake Access Improvements General Recommendation: Neighborhood requests Faciiity Name: Casco Point Ice Rink Type of Faciiity: Special Use Improvements General Recommendation: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Designate an accessible parking stall and reconfigure parking lot. Mark park boundaries Install Benches Make changes to the park so the park has a year around function: Install a backstop Construct a !4 court basketball court install play equipment for ages 1-15. Install a trash can Page 2 of 10 1 U •( * ~ /rrr-a^A-abK i Facility Name: Casco Beach Type of Facility: Lake Access/Beach Improvements General Recommendation; 1. Designate an accessible parking stall 2. Mark park boundaries 3. Provide a bench that has a back and armrests 4. Construct an accessible path(ADA) to the waters edge. Neighborhood requests; Facility Name: Casco Point Park Type of Facility: Nature Conservation Area Improvements General Recommendation: 1. Eradicate buckthorn and plant oaks maples and basswood trees 2. Plant native wild flowers and naturalize spring bulbs 3. Develop an ADA compliant path that bisects park Neighborhood requests: Facility Name: Chew Chase Type of Facility; Currently Undeveloped Improvements General Recommendation: Due to the influx of new families the residents in this subdivision should be contacted to determine if they would like this park improved. This park would be a good place to unify and bring this neighborhood together. As a minimum the following should be done. 1. Identify property comers 2. Install the cities standard park identification sign but select a smaller size 3. Install a bench 4. Install a curb cut for accessibility, ADA 5. Install a small set of play equipment. 6. Install a firm stable path to benches and play equipment 7. Landscape the park Neighborhood requests: P^e3of 10 Facility Name: Crystal Bav Park Type of Facility: Neighborhood Park Improvements General Recommendation: 1. Close off adjacent road Combine city properties Construct an ice rink Install picnic tables Replace and /or improve playground equipment 2010. Install a backstop & soccer goals when property is combined 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Neighborhood requests Construct an ice rink. Facility Name: Crystal Crack Type of Facility: Natural Area Improvements Improve wetlands Provide access to park General Recommendation: Install boardwark through wetlands Neighborhood requests Facility Name: Cvff net Park Type of Facility: Undeveloped Improvements General Recommendation: Due to the influx of new families to this area the residents should be contacted to see If they would like this park improved. This park would be a good place to uni^ and bring this neighborhood together. 1. Identify park boundaries Neighborhood requests Page4of 10 1 Facility Nama: French Creek Preserve Type of Facility: Naturat/Conservation Area Improvements General Recommendation: 1. Install benches with armrests 2. Improve parking lot 3. Identify accessible parking stall 4. Upgrade the existing path so It Is accessible to persons with disabilities 5. Upgrade/replace exhibits Neighborhood requests: Develop an ice skating rink. Facility Name: Hackberrv Park Type of Facility: Neighborhood Park Improvements General Recommendation: Buy adjacent property when it becomes available to expand the park and to upgrade ball fields. 1 Landscape around the sign and along Willow. Plant trees along the penmeter. 2. Upgrade/replace playground equipment 2001-2002. Neighborhood requests: Replace playground equipment Facility Name: Hiahwood Natural Area Type of Facility: Natural Area Improvements Evaluate the site and develop a public use policy and land management plan for this natural area. Highwood is a patch of woods, with a small wetland and seasonal pond. It is pleasing to walk through, but needs attention and maintenance. It has an abandoned, decaying feel. ^. j 1 Define the parking lot. pave it. Identify an accessible parking stall and landscape around it. It currently lacks clear boundaries and dean edges 2 Identify property comers and property line at 200 foot intervals Neighbors appear to bo encroaching on the park with lawn chairs, play forts, a deer stand etc. 3 Clean up debris, including a wooden pallet, boards with protruding nafls. Divwood, trash, etc. Relocate someone's Tolk arT benches and chair made of Page S of 10 • • 5. 6. 7. fallen logs. Remove boards that are nailed into a living tree so ft can be climbed Cut up and spread around the massive amounts of brush. Ideally ft should have been left where ft fell, but someone has piled ft In various places throughout the park. Develop and identify trails Construct small sections of boardwalks over seasonal wetl jnds and vernal pools Construct trails that are accessible to persons with disabilities Neighborhood requests Facility Name: Lee Carlson Type of Facility: Special Use Area Improvements Neighborhood requests Facility Name: Livingston Tower «*Tower P^rk- Type of Facility: Mini Park Improvements General Recommendation: This park is in need of some minor improvements. " Redesign the park, develop a master plan1. 2. Identify property comers with permanent posts or sections of fence 3. Install the standard gray wood with black letters park identification sign 4. Upgrade and improve landscaping. Relocate the bench buried under the dogwood hedge 5. Install at^ssible curb cuts along Blane and Livingston Ave 6. Install unit paver walkways to link the two streets by circling around the relocated and landscaped bird bath. Simultaneously connect the benches to the walkway. Facility Name; Loma Linda Fishing Area Type of Facility: Lake Access Improvements General Recommendation: 1. Identify property comers 2. Improve parking or install no parking signs Neighborhood requests Construct a larger dock with benches. Page 6 of 10 n I - 4 Facility Name: Lowrv Woods Type of Facility: Nature Conservation Area Improvements General Recommendation: 3. Develop a land management plan 4. Buy adjacent property to provide access to the park 5. Identify property comers 6. Establish trails and connect park to Luce Line trail Neighborhood requests: Facility Name: Lurton Park Type of Facility: Natural Area Improvements General Recommendation: Save Bam Neighborhood requests Facility Name: Lvdlard Beach Type of Facility: Lake Access Improvements General Recommendation: This park is in need of some minor improvements. The beach will see an increase in use in the next few years due to the amount of new residents with small children moving into the area. 1 . Identify property corners with permanent posts. 2. install a bench with armrests and a back 3. Install a picnic table 4. Acquire the adjacent triangle-shaped piece of land next to the swimming beach that has become separated from the rest of the property located along Kelley Avenue. 5. Make this beach accessible so that it complies with ADA 6. Install a new and accessible swimming pl^orm 7. Construct an accessible path(ADA) to the waters edge. Neighborhood requests: The residents next to the beach would the gate to remain locked ail the time. Page 7 of 10 Facility Name: Navarre Parle Type of Facility: Mini Park Improvements Replace play equipment in 2020 General Recommendation: Neighborhood requests: Facility Name: Park Lane Flahinff Type of Facility: Lake Access Improvements General Recommendation: 1. Identify property comers Neighborhood requests Facility Name: Pleasant View Park (Western Biff Type of Facility: Currently Undeveloped Improvements. General Recommendation: The boundaries/property lines must be clearly identified and access should be provided so the area can be used and enjoyed by all Orono residents. This park would be a pleasant place for a picnic lunch or bird watching. 1. Establish property lines. 2. Develop a plan for future facilities. 3. Construct a nature trail Facility Name: Saga Hill Park Type of Facility: Neighborhood Park & Natura ConservaWon Area Improvements General Recommendation: Many opportunities exist to improve Saga Hill 1. Complete the process of identifying park boundaries. Erect boundary signs to Page 8 of 10 m 1Ji ensure that neighbors understand where the park begins. 2. Renwve barbed wire fencing inside the park 3. Add a notation to the sign about the Preservation Alliance award Longer term improvement options include: 4. Acquire additional parcels to expand the park 5. Negotiate with the Hennesey family, to incorporate their lot into the park 6. Expand the trail system with a perimeter trail further defining the park boundaries 7. Install trail signs with hiking distances 8. Add an access trail from Wildhurst (may require rough hewn steps) 9. Define a trail to view the ravine 10. Create an informal play field in the active park area 11. Add a kiosk with historical information about the Sags Hill area and trail maps 12. Build a restroom or install seasonal Portable toilets 13. Place interpretive signs to identify the flora and fauna in the park Neighborhood requests Facility Name: Sandy Beach Type of Facility: Lake Access Improvements General Recommendation: 1. Designate an accessible parking stall 2. Mark park boundaries 3. Provide a bench that has a back and armrests 4. Construct an accessible path(ADA) to the waters edge. Neighborhood requests Facility Name: Seven Nations Park Type of Facility: Special Use Area Capital Improvements General Recommendation: 1. Develop a trails and parking lot 2. Connect park to Old Crystal Bay Road trail and Thoroughbred Circle 3! Start implementing plan benches, paved paths, picnic table, etc.. Neighborhood requests Neighbors approved development plan Page 9 of 10 Facility Name: Summit Baaeif Type of Fadtity: Lake Access Improvements General Recommendation: 1. Construct a sand volley ban court 2. Install a ve^ smaliMt of play equipment for chHdren ages six and under 3. Install tenches with armrests and a back. Comply with ADA InstaH a firm stable path to them. 4. Install an ADA compliant picnic table 5. Make this beach accessible so that it complies with ADA. Neighborhood requests Facility Name: Stubbs Road Fi^ihlnq Type of Facility: Lake Access Improvements General Recommendation: 1. Identify property comers 2. Improve parking or install no parking signs 3. Provide ADA accessible fishing pier and parking stall Neighborhood requests Construct a larger dock with benches, PstslOof 10 ■lA. ,.4. .*4/1 i • CMPPart4E. Pario,Open Space and TnJI Han PARK. OPEJV SPACE AJVD TRAIL GOALS AND POUCiES Orono's Park, Open Space and Trail Plan is based i^wn the following Goals and Policies, which in turn are consistent with the other elements of Orono's Land Use and Community Management Plans: I PARK. OPEN SPACE AND TRAH. HOAIiS 1. To provide passive open space and active recreational opportunities diversified enough to serve all Orono residents. 2. To protect and preserve natural resource areas, wildlife habitats and open space. 3. To identify, develop and oversee a City-wide bike and walking trail plan that provides connections ^tween area parks and open space and functions as a transportaMoa corridor. 4. To continually assess and evaluate the current park and open space options in Orono in relation to the needs and desires of Orono residents. 5. To cooperate and actively work with public and private organiaations to provide additional opportunities for recreation and open space that complement existing municipal, regional and private facilities. 6. To encourage civic involvement and partnerships in developing and maintaining Orono*s parks and open spaces. 7. To achieve the above goab within the financial capabilities of the City and its citizens by developing fiscal and management policies that support maintenance, development and acqubition of parks and open spaces. aty of Orono CoaiBaalty Msaafcacat Pbn Pnte4E>lf • • CMPFart4E. Parks, Open Space aad Trail Plan ROLE OF THE PARK COMMISSION The Orono Park Commissioa is an advisory body appointed by the City Council to make recommendations about park, open space and issues. The Park Commission’s mandate as set forth in Municipal Code Section 2.S2 is to “study and consider the continuing needs of the City for parks and recreation areas and fuilities of all kinds, including, but not limited to, problems involving public use of Lake Mirmetonka and other lakes in the City, and portions of its shorelines”. The Park Cotiunission’s role in park planning is to continuously evaluate park, open space and trail facilities and community needs. This ongoing evaluation process will allow for identifleation and prioritization of improvements. The Park Commission will take into account such factors as population growth, demographic changes, levels of facility use, health and s^ety factors, condition of facilities, special populations, adjacent land use compatibility, life cycle recreation, and satisfaction of community needs. In its ongoing park system review and evaluation process, the Park Commission will remain sensitive to local needs, changing circumstances, and limitations on resources, while encouraging a sense of community by improvement and maintenance of neighborhood parks. The continuing review and evaluation process will address the following general areas: a. b. c. e. f g- h. Guidance from the City Council. Park usage and needs, including a periodic (10 year cycle) community-wide survey to determine if conununity needs are being met. Existing park and facilities conditions and maintenance, including equipment upgrade and replacement. Establishment of a lS*year cycle for the review, upgrade and improvement of neighborhood parks. Park facility design compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards, striving for accessibility for persons with disabilities. Landscaping of parks and open spaces. Identification and procurement of additional parklcnd for either passive or active recreation needs. Parks budget and frmding options. Consistency with this PlaiL City of OroBO CoaiBUBity MaBagcncat Pisa Sepitaber 3M9 Pagt4E-f 1 i r . CMP Pari 4E. Parto, Opea Spaca and Trail Plaa PARK. OPEN SPACE AND TRAIL ACTION PLAN Capital Impravcmtat Plaa The City b punuing an active program for park and open space improvemenb. Until the mid-1970s, veiy few city facilities were developed to any degree of improvement Major improvemenb have since been completed at Antoine, Bederwood, Crystal Bay and Hackbeny Parks as well as others; French Creek Preserve and Saga Hill Park have been acquired and improved for passive recreational use; and a few key bike- hike trail segmenb have been completed. The 1994 Residential Survey helped establish a direction for future park acquisitions and improvemenb. The major focus of the Parks, Open Space and Trail Plan will be on the protection of passive recreation amenities such as wetlands, woodlands and other private open space, on the acquisition of selected additional open space parceb, and on the physical improvement of the existing public park facilities and expansion of the existing trail system. In order to assist In determining a prioritization for capital improvement expenditures, the City will develop a 3 to 5 year Parks Capital Improvement Plan which will be reviewed and updated annually. This Parks CIP will address as a minimum the following activities which constitute Orono’s “Paries, Open Space and Trail Action Plan”: 1. Obtain an agreement for the acquisition of the renuuning residential lot within Hackbeny Park. 2. Identify for preservation/acquisition areas with unique natural features and wildlife hahibb that will make a substantial contribution toward preserving Orono’s natural open rural character. 3. Identify future locations for neighborhood parks in advance of development so that they can be included in subdivbion plans, and the City can obtain land through the park dedication requirement. 4. Plan for a neighborhood park for the area in the area of Highway 12 and Old Crystal Bay Road 5. Plan for an underpass at County Road 6 and Old Crystal Bay Road for the Old Crystal Bay Road trail. City efOrooo Commaalty MaBagcncat Plaa Pagc4E-16 CMPP«it4E. ParkitOpeDSpaccudTrailPIsD 6.Convert the Dakota Rail coiridor to a re^onal fecieational trail as an interim use until such future time that the corridor is re<}tnred for some regional transportation use. 7.Ensure all new bridges to be constructed as part of the new Highway 12 project have sufficient trails/sidewalks such that all existing transportation and recreational uses including walking and biking (and horseriding on the Luce Line Trail) are maintained. 8.Coordinate with the City of Long Lake, and woric with Mn/DOT and other agencies regar^Ung a trail and park along the south side of the new Highway 12 corridor. 9.Determine the City ’s long-term needs for playfields to meet the needs of organized youth sports activities and coordinate the eventual provision and cost-sharing for these facilities with the appropriate public agencies and private organizations. 10.Preserve and retain all existing public access lanes to Lake Minnetonka as detailed in the Transportation element of the CMP. 11.Develop plans for and implement a north south trail along Orono Orchard Road connecting the Dakota Rail corridor trail with the Orono Golf Course, the Luce Line Trail, and the Highway 12 corridor trail. Funding for Acqubition of New Lands and Facilities Orono currently provides funding for park, open space and trail needs by three specific methods: 1) mandatory developer contributions of land or cash payments to the Park Dedication Fund at the time property is subdivided or developed; 2) transfers from the City ’s General Fund; and 3) private contributions of land or funds. As Orono becomes fully developed over the next 20 years, the amount of money collected via required Park Dedications as a result of new development will decrease substantially. Funding for the acquisition of park lands and for improvement of existing facilities will require alternative sources of capital in the future. The City will continue to investigate mechanisms for future funding (such as user fees, grants, etc.) and vrill continue to encourage private donations of land or funds in order to maintiun the level of active a^ passive recreation opportunities desired by Orono residents. City of Oieao OmBuUy Maufcant Plan Page 4E-27 Decision Resources, Ltd.September, 1994' ORONO RESIDENTIAL SURVEY Executive Summaiy MfthnAihifvr 400 randomly selected bouseholds contacted by telephone Administered July 5 to 19,1994 Average intendew time of 26 minutes ftojectable within ± 5.0 to the entire adult population Residential Demofraphics: Average residential longevity of 18.7 years 22% of households contain seniors; 37% of households contain children 52% of households headed by Professional-Technical and Owner-Managers 22% of households headed by retirees Average adult age of 48.0 years old 34% of households contain a member of a private or public health club 24% of households contain adults partic^ating on organized ^its teams 61 % of households containing children participate in youth team sports 37% of households purchased a Hennepin Parks sdcker 40% of households reported being on a lake 31% of households on 1/2 to one acre; 21 %, on 1-2 acres; 20%. on less than 1/2 acre; 17% on 2-5 acres; 9% of households on five or more acres Findings: 96% rate their quah'ly of life as "excellent" or "good;" 52%, as "excellent. 31 % r^mrted the "rural nature” of the community as what th^r liked most about livii^ in Orono. 20% cited the "lakes.” 14% were partial to the community's "quiet." "Convenient location” and "their bouse* were mentioned by 7% each. "Nice people* were key to 5%, while "natural beauty" was uppemost to 4%. Smaller numbers reported "safe area," "schools,” "weU-run community," and "everything.” "High taxes," at 18%, was the aspect of life in Orono that residents least. "Roads* and "traffic" were cited by 8% each. "City government" was an issue for 7%, while "poor location* was cited by 6% of the respondents. "Poor city services" and "growth” were concerns for 5% each. Fewer residents mentioned "highway problems,” "cost of services," "lack of shopimig,” and "city regulations." 9% were Cby Boasters who stated there was "nothing" they disliked. At least twenty-five percent of the bousdiolds in Orono reported daily or weddy poxtidpatioo in the fbUowing leisure time activities: gardening, at 66%; Inrd watching, exercise walking or Basel Dicision Resources, Ltd,September, 19H joggioSt at 63%; bintwatchiog* at 54%; motor boating, at 33%; bicycEng, at 31 %; hiking, at 30%; nature walks, at 28%; and, swimming in lakes, at 27%. 21% of the households in Orono also reported participating or observing softball/basd)all games at least weddy during the season. 80% of the residents felt the cuneat mix of parks and recreational funlities in and around the. community met the needs of their households. 18% disagreed and suggested more trails, more parks, playground equipment, more ballfields, an ice arena, or tennb courts. 66% felt the City of Orono already had adequate park fmilides for city residents, while 26% felt the City should develop a more extensive park system. The chief priority for City park and recreational develq)ment was deemed to be "preserving more natural land areas, such as wetlands, scenic (pen spaces, and wildlife habitats* by 42% of die samjde. 23% would prioritize 'developing additional passive pork facilities, such as walking trails and flower gardens,” while 13% opted for "developing additional active park facilities, such as ball Adds and playgrounds. * 15 % would support a combination approach. The average resident in Oiono would support a $25.20 increase in their yearly property taxes to fund the preservadon of open qiace or die devdopment of parks and recreational facilities. But, 36% would support no increase for this purpose. Majorities of residents supported a property tax increase for: (1) nature preserves, 62%-33%; (2) nature walking and bicycling trails, 61%-35%; (3) playground equipment for children, 56%*38%; (4) paved walking and bicycling trails, 53%*43%; and, (5) nanire observation areas, 51%>43%. Th^ opposed: (1) public water access for boats and/or canoes, 26%'68%; (2) outdoor basketball courts, 28%-65%; (3) outdoor tennis courts, 28%-6S%; (4) outdoor volleyball courts, 31%*62%; (5) playfidds for soccer, football, softball,- and baseball, 35%-59%; (6) picnic areas and shelters, 39%-56%; and, (7) swimming beaches, 40%'54%. The average Orono reddent would drive at least 16.2 minutes to a park or recreational facility of interest to them. 64% supported the charging of a user fee for city-owned and operated park and recreational focilities; 30% opposed the use of user fees to underwrite and recover the cost of constructing and operating City park and recreational facilities. The average percentage of the costs that residents would hope to recover through user fees was 43.8%. 58% favored in concept a trail system linking parks and recreational facilities within the community; but, only 36% still fovored it if a property tax increase were required to.devdop the system. If a citywide trail system were built, foougb, 87% felt it should serve both pedestrians and bicyclists. 57% favored in concep t the develc^ment of additional trails in Orono going *cross-couoty* rimilar to the Luce Line; 32% opposed it But if a property tax Increase were leqoired to devdep tiiese trails, support dropped to 37% of the reqwndents. Among those supporting Ais irafl oooeQrt 74% ind«<^*gd Aey would continue to support it even if Ae trail were to run by Aetr prop^. Rage 2 Decision Resourca, Ltd,Septaabert.1994 73% fated the foainteiiance of Oiono park and recreadottal facilities as *excellent* or "good,* only fifteen percent saw it as *only fair* or *poof.* This rating was lower than the Metropcditan Area suburban average of 89% a^ravaL Most’residents saw no need for better maintenance or inq>rovemeot of each on a short list of park facilities. The only facility showing a q>lit in perc^tiona of need was "restrooms,* where 48% saw a need for improvements and 52% did not . 47% of the sample reported contacting the Ci^ of Orono to seek information, get services, or^ lodge complaints; this level of contact was twice as hi^ as the Metropolitan Area suburban norm. Among those contacting the City, 68% were satisfied with the service they received, while 27% were dissati sfied. Most dissatisfaction stemmed from results, rather dian process or treatment. 46% visited City Kali during the past year; the Metropolitan Area suburban norm was 30%. Among visitors, high levels of satisfaction was reported: 74% rated the coovenienoe of City Hall hours as "excellent ” or "good;” 18%, as "only fair" or *poor;” 81% rated the waidng dme for service positively, while 12% rated it lower; 84% rated the oounesy of the staff as "excellent* or "good,* while 11% saw it as "only or "poor;* and, 72% rated the efficiency of the staff posidvdy, while 19% were more critical in judgment. Residents primarily relied upon local newspapers as their prinripal source of information about event and activities transpiring in Orono. 74% mentioned either newspapers in general or a specific publication. The "grapevine" was crucial for nine percent of the sample. Newsletters and mailings were relied upon by eight percent, while three percent depended on school district materials. Conduxionsi • A majority of residents do not see the need for the development of a more extensive park and recreation system in Orono. • Residents expressed support in concept and in commitment eftax dollars to preserving more natural land areas, such as wetlands, scenic open spaces, end wildlife habitats, in the community. • While majorities favor more extensive trails in Orono in concept, majorities did not favor increasing taxes for a system linldng parks and recreational facilities nor one ”cross«country." • In recreational planning for the cooununity, residents placed an accent on recreatiooal pursuits revolving around trail*related activities — such as hikmg, walking, and bicycling — and lake-related activities - such as swimming and boating. • Residents supported tax increases for recreational facilities related to passivt Idsurt time pursuits — nature preserves, trs^, playground equipment, and nature observation areas ~ as opposed to active leisure-time pursuits. • Users fees were viewed as an appropriate means of underwriting the construction and operating costs of recreatiooal facilities. Pages « ;< • • Hello. I'm _ _ _ _ of Decision Resources, a polling firm located in Minneapolis. We have 5>««*'/*^®}2«5tfi^about^issues Orono to speak with a random sample of residents ^facing the community. This survey is being conducted because citv Council and Park Commission members and City Staff Interested in your opinions and suggestions about that all ;2crSS?iSnal needs in the future. I want toSd”idSS; respon.es will be held strictly confidential only summaries of the entire sample will be reported. 1. Approximately how many years have * * 16% yll lived in the City of Orono? ten to twenty years...23% 20 TO 30 YEARS. . . . .13% OVER THIRTY YEARS. . .16% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . .0% 2. HOW would you rate the quality o£ EXCELLENT. life in Orono -- excellent, good, ^D....... . . . . . only f air. or poor? ^ FAIR.. . . . . . . .^ ^ DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . .1% 3. What do you like most about living in Orono? peo^le?”sv?' s»ioL!i»; NATUWa BEADTV, 4%; EVERYTHING, 3%; WELL-RUN, 2». 4. And, what do you like least about living in Orono? IS: it: I would liJ«,«„«Mttn“ou I^dTther“eSS«rol"yoirhou«- hlld eSgage in that ^Seatheranr«IsSn%emitting, thl^SScbel If riS« you ir^ther household members participate. (ROTATE LIST) DAIL WEEK SEVR MONT YEAR NEVR DK/H 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. fishing? swinuning in lakes? swimming in pools? hiking? bicycling? golfing? cross-country skiing? snowmobiling? nature walks? horseback riding? canoeing? exercise walking or jogging? motor boating? sailing? camping? picnicking? bird watching? gardening? rollerblading or roller skating? archery? using children’s play ground equipment? 3%15%10%18%24%32%0% 8%19%12%16%14%30%0% 6%17%6%13%13%45%1% 12%18%8%21%14%28%0% 10%21%11%18%7%34%0% 5%19%6%14%10%46%0% 2%10%6%11% 12% 60%0% 2%6%4%6% 8% 75%0% 5%23%11%20%14%27%0% 1%2%2%2% 5%89%0% 2%5%• 4%11%16%64%0% 28%35%6%9%3%18%1% 7%26%8%11%10%39%0% 1%5%2%4%9%79%0% 0%3%6%16%18%58%0% 3%12%14%26%16%30%0% 41%13%3%4%6%34%0% 46%20%2%5%3%24%0% 2%12%4%4%2%75%1% 0%2%2%5%3%87%1% 4%11%7%11%3%65%0% For the following activities, tell me how often you and other members of your household engage in that activity or go to ob serve that activity. Do you or any members of your household engage in or observe that activity, weather and season permit ting, almost daily, weekly, several times each month, monthly, several times each year, or never. Again, for seasonal activi ties, please tell me how often you or household members partici pate or observe during the season. And, please keep in mind we are only asking about local amateur, school district, and/or neighborhood games. DAIL WEEK SEVR MONT YEAR NEVR DK/R 26.softball or baseball?4%17%3% 9% 8%59%0% 27.volleyball?1%7%2%6%6%79%0% 26.hockey?3%7%3%8%7%74%0% 29.outdoor ice skating?3% 10%4%14%10%59%0% 30.soccer or football?3%14%4%8%8%64%0% 31.tennis?2%9%5%10%8%66%0% 32.basketball?2%8%3%8% 6% 73%0% 33.Do you feel that the current mix YES. .. .80% and number of parks and recrea NO. .. tional facilities in and around DON’T KNOW/REFUSED.. the community meet the needs of you and other members of your household? IF "NO," ASK: 34. What additional parks and recreational facilities would you like to see offered residents? 35 Do you feel the City of Orono SHOULD DE^hOP. . . . .26% should develop a mo« extensive ARE ADEQUATE.^...... .66% park system or do you feel that DON'T KNOW/REFOSED. . .8% current facilities are adequate for city residents? The City could undertake a number of park and recreational devel opment efforts. 36. Which of the following would you PRIORI^ A. . . . . . . .42% make the chief priority of the .. . . . . . .City of Orono .... {ROTATE) PRIORITY C.. . ...... ■ • • 2 ” A. Preserving more natural land "is.areas, suSh as wetlands, see- M-I, OP ABOTO (VOL).... 1S% SiSiflts,*'’“**' B. Developing additional active park facilities, such as ball fields and playgrounds; C. Developing additional passive park facilities, such as walk ing trails and flower gardens. The oreservation of open space or the development of ^ facilities by the City of Orono would probably a property t« increase. Lppose the City were to pro- ooM^parks'^and recreational development efforts along the lines ^0 have been discussing.••• 37. HOW much would you be willing to N^ING. . . . . .!! " see your yearly property taxes $30.0 . . . . .... . . increase to fund the parks and $60.00. . . . . .. recreational development efforts? $90.00.. . . . . . . . . . Let^s say, would you be willing to $120.00. . . . . . . . . .. vour yearly tLces increased by $150.00. . . . . . . . . . i ? (CHOOSE^RANDOM STARTING $180.00.... . . . . . .*5 POINT; MOVE UP OR DOWN DEPENDING . . . .! ! ! ! ! .3% ON ANSWER) How about $_ _ per .. . . . . . . . . . year? (REPEAT PROCESS) 1,4 uve to read you a list of park and recreation soSe“It SS^poSrJtn^Shat eppos^. or strongly oppose a moderate property tax increase to fund its development. If you don't know, just say so. (ROTATE LIST) 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. Picnic areas and shelters? Swimming beaches? Playground equipment for children? Paved walking and bicycling trails? Nature walking and bicycling trails? Outdoor tennis courts? Outdoor basketball courts? Nature observation areas? Playfields, for soccer, football, softball and baseball? Pxiblic water access for boats and/or canoes? Outdoor volleyball courts? Nature preserves? STS SMS SMO STO DKR 10%29%25%31%5% 15% 25%23%31%6% 20%36%15%23%7% 24%29%18%25% •5% 25%36%13%22%5% 10%18% 31%34%8% 11%17%31%34%8% 18%33%17%26%7% 14% 21%28%31%7% 10%16%24%44%6% 8%23%29%33%8% 26%36%11%22%6% Now, let's consider a park or recreational facility that you would drive to .... SO.On average, how many minutes are you willing to drive to a park or recreational facility of interest to you? LESS THAN FIVE MINUTES.9% 5 ‘rO 10 MINUTES. . . . .19% 11 TO 15 MINUTES. . . .18% 16 TO 20 MINUTES. . . ,19% 21 TO 30 MINUTES. . . 24% 31 TO 45 MINUTES. . . .2% 46 TO 60 MINUTES. . . .2% OVER 60 MINUTES. . . . .3% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED- - .5% Some communities charge user fees to underwrite and recover the cost of constructing and operating City park and recreational facilities. User fees could be charged to any resident or non resident using an Orono Park System facility, such as a picnic area, tennis, volleyball, or basketball courts, playfields, trails, and public water accesses. Users could be charged a flat fee for each use of the facility or a sticker could be required for the appropriate seasonal usage. 51.In general, do you support or oppose charging a user fee for STRONGLY SUPPORT. . .40% SUPPORT. . . . ... . .24% city-owned and operated park and OPPOSE 12% STRONGLY OPPOSE.............18%recreational facilities? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel strongly DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.........7% that way? 4 percentage of >ugh user fees, recover less -cent, twenty- :y percent, ^e percent, ; to one-hun- :e than one- :he costs? .an and bicycle >ppose a trail i and recrea- Lthin the com- ' ASK:) Would Lf a property squired to de- system were Imarlly serve ily serve bicy- h? ent trail systen ajor local roadi hem "cross-count oppose addl- "cross-coun- Luce Line? Do you feel OR "FAVOR," as; 1 support it teoc increase to develop 1 favor it if ■ to run by your ild you rate the ao Park and rec- -- excellent, c poor? r#Tp> • • fair, or poor? 71. Convenience of City Hall hours? 72. 73. 74. Halting time for service? Courtesy of the staff? Efficiency of the staff? IF "EXCELLENT" OR "POOR" II 75. Do you recall which Department you were visiting? EXCL GOOD FAIR POOR DK-R 17%57%14%4% 6% • 22%57%10%2% 9% • 29%55%9%2% 6% 22%50%16%3% 9% QUESTIONS #71-#74,ASK: NO ANSWER, 30%; PERMIT, 28%; PARK ^ ^C, 1%; PUBLIC WORKS, 4%; PLANNING, 9%; FRONT DESK, 10%, POLICE, 5%; COUNCIL, 5%; OTHER, 8%. 76.What is your principal source of information about events and activities going on in the City of Orono? Mrt awsWER S%; PEOPLE, 9%; PAPER, 28%; LAKER, 5%; ^WSiISeR, 5%, PIONEER PRESS, 16%, FROM SCHOOL, 3%; MAILINGS, 3%; OTHER, 2%. NOW, just a few more questions for statistical purposes.... LESS THAN^I/^ACRE. .. .20% essDfeaessw -------------------than 1/2 acre, 1/2 acre to one FIVE TO 10 ACRES. . . .6% OVER 10 ACRES. . . . . .3% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . .2-< Be sure to include yourself. a«e 'one'iwi io two acre., two TWO T<>. . ITrl' to f iv, acre., .f iv._a=res to FI^ TO lO^^S.......6J acres, or over 10 acres? 78. First, persons 65 or over?NONE ONE. TWO. 78% 10% 12% 79. Adults under 65?NONE. . . . . . . . . . ONE. . . . . . . . . . . TWO. . . . . . . . . . . THREE. . . . . . . . . FOUR OR MORE. . . . . . 15% 12% 59% .9% 80. 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87. L School>aged children or pre-schoolers? NONE. . . . . . . . . . . .64 V ONE... . . . . . . . . . . .13% TWO. . . . . . . . . . . . .14% TliREE. . . . . . . . . . . .7% FOUR OR MORS. . . . . . .3% IF CHILDREN ARE PRESENT ASK: 81. Do any of your children cur rently participate in team sports? YES. . . . . . . . . . . .61% NO. . .. . . . . . . . . .38% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . .1% What is your occupation and, if applicable, the occupation of your spouse or partner? PROFESSIONAL-TECHNICAL, 15%; OWNER-MANAGER, 37%; CLERICAL- SALES, 12%; BLUE COLLAR, 10%; RETIRED, 22%; SCATTERED, 5%. What is your age, please? (READ CATEGORIES, IF NEEDED) Do you or any members of your household currently have a met ship in a private or public h< club? Do you or any adult members of your household currently partlci pate on any organized sports teams? Has your household purchased a Hennepin Parks sticker for using the parks and trails system? Is your current residence on a lake? 88. Gender. (DO NOT ASK) 89. Region. 18-24. . . . . . . . . . 25-34. . . . . . . . . . 35-44. . . . . . . . . . 45-54. . . . . . . . . . 55-64. . . . . . . . . . 65 AND OVER. . . . . REFUSED. . . . . . . . • YES. . . . . . . . . . . . .34% NO. . . . . . . . . . . . DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.. YES. . . . . . . . . . . . .24% NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . .76% DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . YES. . . . . . . . . . . . .37% NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . .63% CON'T KNOW/REFUSED... . .0% YSS. . . . . . . . . . . . .. .40% NO. . . . . . . . .. . . .. .60% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.. MALE. . . . . . . . . . FEMALE. . . . . . . . . P^CTNCT ONE. . . . . .. .22% PPEfTNCT TWO. . . . . .. .22% PRECINCT THREE. . . PRECINCT FOUR. . . . 8 f Artt-W I - Survey of Surrounding Area Park Resources City Populition # Parks Type of Park»_____i Parfc £•» CHy Budfl«t Park Budget % of Total Notes Orono 7538 P. B N. U 2/3 FTE $ 4.300.( i- 68,150 . i— ____In addition to operating budget i .6% $5000 for cap. Imp. 0$ in pack dedication Deephaven 3853------P.B 2.5 FTE $ 4.354.473 $ 100.1 e - ^ - i---------- it:•—t 2.3% 20.(XXVyr for capital improvements They pet cash donations for maiof improvementst Excelsior I--- Long Lake 2393 842 i 2 I 3 P.BB. S. B $ 1,500.000 $ P. B. S 2/3 FTE $ 100.1 106.( Have $80,000 In park dedication ___ 6.y% Charge fees for parties at Commons $800/yr. from baseball. $10,000 /yr cap. Improvements Loretto Medina L 570 4005 3 PTE-summer $ 227.000 i $ -■-4-BB I FTE ♦ PT sum. $ 2,300,1 *-$ 25.500 74.000 11.2% $2,000 from Lions for skate park 3.2% $300,000 for future dev. & $500,000 for Hamel Legion Park Mound 9435it 30'P.B 2FTE+ 6sum. $ 3.524.160 $ 322.240 9.1% Shorewood Waconia Wayzata 7400 P.BB.B.S 6814 4113 $ 3.500.000 $ ; 1 FTE’ $ 3.500.000 | $ PiBB.B.S 4 FTE ♦ 5 seas. $ 6.555.154 ! $ 172.770 . . . - S t- 5.0% $5 user fee (sock fee), $35,000 for capital Improvemenis 600.1 488.359 17.1% 7.5% $37.800 CapIte Type of Park -fp- B-4“N Playground Beach Natural Area Baseball park Undeveloped Skating rink Adv. 7.6% ____-L - L —