Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08-11-2003 Council Packet
Of^tCicU RjBjuvUh AUG 1 I 2003 AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEE1ING SE1 FOR MONDAY, AU60S’Plf/90iii«)7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet. ROLL CALL CONSENT AGENDA I. Approve/Amend APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 2. Regular Council Meeting of July 28,2003 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Pat Wolfe. Representative PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Sandy Smith. Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 3. #03-2893 John and Roberta llenrich, 4125 Highwood Road - Variance - * 4. #03-2895 Gary Germundsen, 4101 Highwood Road - Variance - Denial Resolution * 5. #03-2904 Richard S. Brown, 1 300 Shoreline Drive - Variance - Resolution 6. #03-2907 Jeff and Cara Ziebarth, 720 North Arm Drive - Variances - Revised Plan #03-2916 Phillip Smith, 2600 West Lafayette Road - Variance - Resolution #03-2920 St. Edward’s Episcopal Church, 865 Femdale Road North - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution 7. 8. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR’S REPORT 9. Accept Quotations Navarre Sidewalk Project 1 0. Approve County Road 6 Feasibility Report CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 11 . Request for Payment - Navarre Fire Station 12. Adopt New Code for the City of Orono - Ordinance 13. Support of Partnership to Address Substance Abuse - Resolution 14. Saga Hill Park Land Exchange 1 5. Release of Conservation Easement - Fleming Trail Addition CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT * 16. LICENSES • 17. BILLS AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MFFTING SFT FOR MONDAY, AUGUST II. 2003,7;00 F.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2700 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 2m 08/06 08/06 08/07 08/11 08/18 08/25 Council Work Session, 5:30 p.m. Planning Commission Work Session, 5:30 p.m. Council Work Session, 5:30 p.m. Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. Planning Commission Meeting, 6:00 p.m. Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 09/01 - HOLIDAY, Observance of Labor Day 09/02 - Park Commission Meeting, Park Tour, 5:30 p.m. 09/03 - Planning Commission Work Session, 5:30 p.m. 08/08 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 08/15 - Planning Commission Meeting, 6:00 p.m. 08/22 - Council Meeting. 7:00 p.m. ? J r Public A ttendance Meeting D ate y -I E3^Council —— □ Planning Commission □ Park Commission □ O ther Please filloutthe information requested BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER (In V/A 2. S • TetApeec f^eisicvi UZcut. bg,______/ lari -p 3. vl fi^CGkAfc. 4. O'f-lcs^.^ C/n 01 (f CijS K( f IfO ,KJ S.^.Tokn f /Utfri tiJK JlJi^hyL'Ocx:^^3 6. r; c /HL. 7.. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14.. 15. ■pPlMh J ORONO errY COUNC™MEETING ........... Monday, July 28.2003 AUG 1 1 2003 7:00 o ’clock p.m. CITY OH ORONO ROLL The Council met on the above mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Barbara Peterson; Council Members Jim Murphy, Bob Sansevere, and late arrival Jim Murphy; City Attorney Thomas Barrett; Representing staff were City Administrator Ron Moorsc, Planning Director Mike Gaffron, Planners Melanie Foth and Janice Waataja, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, Public Service Director Greg Gappa, and Recorder Kristi Anderson. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approvc/Amead Council members added items #12,18,19, and 20 to the Consent Agenda. White arrived at 7:03 P.M. Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES *2. Regular Council Meeting of July 14,2003 Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of July 14,2003 as presented. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 2A. PRESENTATION BY DJ GOMAN - LONG LAKE FIRE EQnPMENT DJ Goman, of the Long Lake Fire Department, gave a presentation regarding a new piece of equipment needed by the Fire Station, a heavy rescue fire truck. He reviewed the specifications for the City Council, which included, a 24’ box able to accommodate fire assistance equipment, water rescue nibber suits, and auto accident extraction tools. He e.xplained that the non-water carrying vehicle would provide a command post for accident scenes, as well as, a light tower to illuminate accident scenes. The vehicle would utilize a standardized commercial size chassis with roll-up cabinet doors Goman stated that the current 1978 model 'bread truck’ is inadequate for many reasons, it does not meet OSHA standards, provides no seatbelt constraints, is outdated, and the cabinet doors open en route to acciilent scenes spilling their contents. Although the Fire Department has been given approval by the Fire Ad\ isory Board to proceed, Goman indicated that they need a motion from each of the Orono, Medina, and Long Lake Councils to move forward with the bid process. He indicated that the projected timeframe would be to have the vehicle by the end of the year. Mayor Peterson explained that both she and Murphy were present during the Fire Advisory Board meeting and endorsed the purchase of the command post vehicle as part of the capital improvement plan for the Long Lake Fire Department. PAGE 1 of 18 » . I I k f '• • * i ( » «0 v)i MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 28,2003 7:00 o’clock p.m. (LONG LAKE FIRE EQUIPMENT PRESENTATION - Contlaacd) As this was the first he’d heard of it, Sansevere questioned when it was determined this purchase was necessary and whether the piece of equipment was a standard piece for departments today. Goman indicated that it had been a scheduled purchase for quite some time and that it was a standard vehicle for most departments today. He explained that the department had been using a smaller makeshift utility vehicle to assist in extractions at accident sites, fire rescues, and water rescues; however, this was not effective. He stated that the larger size is necessary for growth to house (he equipment needed for various types of rescue and the coordination of communication. White questioned what the estimated purchase price might be. Mayor Peterson indicated that the figures arc unknown and granting approval to set the truck out for bid will provide those numbers. White questioned whether fire departments have stats and floor plans for Orono if they are assisting in those rescues. He suggested that the City require builders to supply the blueprints or floor plans to the fire department to assist them in fire and rescue efforts should the need arise. Goman stated that the current plan for the command center is to incorporate some of those computerized capabilities thru a CAD system with updated plans for some buildings. Murphy complimented Goman on his presentation and ongoing efforts to research the most suitable vehicle for the job. He indicated that the replacement truck had been in the capital plan for 10 years and that, by using a standardized truck chassis, maintenance costs will be reduced. He noted that some important items have been included and others eliminated, such as the need for air pack refills, as other departments can be called in with those amenities. Mayor Peterson moved. White seconded, to authorize the Long Lake Fire Department to put the truck out for bid according to the specifications presented with ad alternates. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Mayor Peterson noted that Medina and Long Lake would also be voting to move forward with the truck bid process. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Irene SUber Silber stated that she had no new comments. White shared that the Three Rivers Park District recently discussed all trails in their district and acknowledged the fact that the Orono trail system is one of the few used for shopping trips. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - J. Mark Frilzler As Fritzler was unable to attend, Murphy and White indicated that they had both attended the recent Planning Commission meeting and would be able to comment if necessary. PAGE 2 of 18 atoiiVwAh^Btdilih aiftiiitilihdiii Ilf ....... MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 28,2003 7:00 o’clock p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were none. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT *3. #02-2809 RICK STERLING, 1300 VINE PLACE - VARIANCE AMENDMENT RESOLUTION NO. 5008 Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5008, a Resolution granting an average lakeshore setback variance for 1300 Vine Place. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0, 4. #03-2895 GARY GERMUNDSEN, 4101 HIGHWOOD ROAD - VARIANCE Waataja reported that the applicant had requested the following variances to construct a I2’XI2* deck on the lakeside of the new residence. 50.5% hardcover in the 75-250’ zone (46.8% currently exists) where 25% is allowed and 1,708 s.f. of structural coverage (1,528 currently exists) where 1,500 s.f. is allowed. Waataja stated that staff would recommend denial of the request based on Resolution #4645 which approved variances allowing construction of the existing house, limiting the applicant to 40% hardcover. Furthermore, denial of the request would be recommended since, as it currently exists, the home is over on lot coverage by structures and never received a variance. The Planning Commission concurred with staff and voted 7-0 to recommend denial of the hardcover and structural coverage variances finding no viable hardships to support the variance requests. In addition, when reviewing hardcover calculations, Waataja pointed out that retaining walls were added at the time of construction to ensure proper drainage and were not proposed with the initial renewal variance review process. The driveway also appears larger than what was depicted on the original survey. Currently, the home is in excess of the Lot coverage by structures by 28 s.f., at 1,528 s.f. This was a result of a modification to the plan upon construction of the home. Waataja stated that the modifications include the 1.5 ’XI2’ two story bump-out and enlarged deck entry. The applicant is proposing a second story deck and stairw ay off the lakeside of the home greater than 6 ’ off grade; therefore, it would be included in the lot coverage by structures figure. Germundsen stated that he bought the home with the structure and plans done. He noted that the plans did not accommodate well for water runoff, since most of the water from Highwood Road runs between he and his neighbor’s property. He indicated that he had nothing on the property to trade for the deck and believed that the deck would provide him with an additional fire safety access. Germundsen maintained that the small lot was zoned too large for what it could accommodate and shared letters from both his neighbors in PAGE 3 of 18 i MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 28,2003 7:00 o ’clock p.m. (GARY GERMUNDSEN, 4101 HIGHWOOD ROAD, Continued) support of his application. Germundsen also pointed out that his neighbors on either side protrude 15-25* further into the average lakeshore setback than his home. Finally, he stated that due to the narrowness of Highwood Road, parking is a hardship that deters him from being able to eliminate any more of his driveway than necessary. He repeated his request for approval of the deck which would protrude a mere 9' from the house structure. White questioned why the home was built further back than the average lakeshore setback. Gaffron pointed out that the steep drop in the topography of the site limited the building pad, as did the desire to keep the driveway short to obtain more space for the home itself. Sansevere asked staff if they had heard anything from the applicant which would cause them to change their opinion or recommendation. Gaffron stated that the home should have been designed smaller from the beginning to accommodate a deck. He maintained that early decisions in the design precluded the applicant from adding a deck now and that no viable hardship exists to support the request. Murphy stated that, having sat in on the Planning Commission discussion, he concurred with their opinion that the lot had been maxed out. While the lot is narrov/ and he could appreciate the applicant’s desire for a deck, there was no where to reduce hardcover or no viable hardship. Mayor Peterson recalled the original 2001 application and questioned whether the sliding doors were present and how they would be blocked off now. Gaffron stated that the sliding doors were not part of the original plans and that they would need to be blocked off with a rail system 6 ” out. Germundsen stated that the other planner he worked with in 2001 indicated that he would likely be able to apply for a variance for his deck later, once his original plans were approved. Gaffron stated that the conversation the applicant was referring to had not been documented; therefore, he could not comment why this would have been said. Gaffron felt that recommendation was out of character from what planners typically suggest. Mayor Peterson questioned the need for safety access. Germundsen asked to be allowed an additional emergency exit to his second story living space. PAGE 4 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 28,2003 7:00 o’clock p.m. (GARY GERMUNDSEN, 4101 HIGHWOOD ROAD, Continued) GafTron stated that the building code does not require access for exiting the home there and suggested the applicant look into a rope ladder exit. Mayor Peterson stated that she was unwilling to allow the additional hardcover over the existing 1,528 s.f., noting small lot - small house. White recognized the applicant’s dilemma, with no hardship or hardcover to remove, he found it difficult to support the request. GafTron pointed out that the existing home differs than the original plan, including egress and bump-out windows, as well as, retaining walls. He noted that the driveway is gravel and still to be paved sided by green space. While he acknowledged that staff could accept the changes that occurred during construction, they could not support the addition of a deck. Sansevere moved, Murphy seconded, to deny Application #03-2895, Gary Germundsen, 4101 Highwood Road, a request for variances to construct a 12*X12* deck on the lake side of the new residence. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 5. #03-2904 RICHARD S. BROWN, 1300 SHORELINE DRIVE - AFTER-THE-FACT \'AR1ANCE GafTron explained that the applicant requested an after-the-fact variance for certain retaining wall setbacks on the property, and a hardcover variance for excessive hardcover in the 500-1000* zone. This item was tabled at the June Planning Commission meeting to allow the applicant to explore ways to reduce the excess hardcover. Allowed = 35% = 6,785.6 s.f. Existing = 50.8% = 9,860 s.f. Initial Proposal = 45.9% = 8,908 s.f. Revised Proposal = 39.7% 7,693 s.f. Gaffron indicated that the applicant has made a good faith effort to reduce hardcover by eliminating the circle driveway and replacing it with a walkway and stairs in the front yard, and establishing parking spaces near the lower driveway. After working with a landscape architect, the applicant determined that removal of the circular drive could result in a positive impact to the property and result in a hardcover reduction of 2,167 s.f., yielding a final 500-1000' hardcover of 7,693 s.f or 39.7%. At its July 21,2003 Planning Commission Meeting, the Commission reviewed the revised plans and on a vote of 5-2 recommended approval of the revised plan for 39.7% hardcover subject to the following conditions: PAGE 5 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 28,2003 7:00 o'clock p.m. (RICHARD S. BROWN, 1300 SHORELINE DRIVE, Contiaued) 1 . Existing encroachments of wetland or required wetland setbacks by retaining walls, fill or paved surfaces shall be removed. 2. Retaining walls shall be removed wherever they extend outside the property boundaries, and any walls to remain within 5 ’ of the lot lines should be reviewed by staff to determine whether they are needed to support steep slopes or whether they are purely aesthetic in nature, and those not necessary to support the topography of the site shall be removed. 3. All landscape beds lined with fabric or plastic shall have such liner removed. The minority opinion of the Planning Commission was that the removals did not reach the 35% limit established by code and they failed to see a hardship supporting the variances. GafIron explained that staff believed the applicant had made a good faith effort to reduce hardcover to 39.7%. He indicated that if the Council concludes that the unique circumstances regarding the history of this property could be deemed as a hardship, then approval of the after-the-fact variances per the revised removal plan would be in order. Mr. Brown stood for questions, commenting that he was disappointed with the process this application had taken, although he felt that Gaflron had been fair and reasonable throughout. With regard to the history of this property, Murphy stated that the City had always had a difficult time with the previous owner, which was no reflection on Mr. Brown. He believed the City had ample opportunity to inspect the work in progress and that it was unfortunate that neighbors ’ calls that things were out of control were not followed up on. He was bothered by the fact that the hardcover was way over after construction was complete, that the owner/builder had taken the City for ‘a ride’, and that the new owner was left holding the bag. Brown questioned that, despite the neighbor ’s concern, when he called one month prior to closing on the property, the City did not express concern and told him that electric inspections etc. were all that remained. He felt the City had plenty of opportunity to catch this before it got to the point it was at w hen he purchased it. White stated that he believed Brown had gone to great lengths to reduce the hardcover by 20%, and agreed that the City did have chances to correct this problem earlier. He indicated that the Planning Commission spent much time debating the application and that he agreed with the recommendation. Mayor Peterson, too, saw the Planning Commission discussion and agreed that what the applicant had done was fair. Having driven past the home during construction, she questioned why it was never checked over a year period. She complimented the applicant for making the best of a bad situation. Sansevere believed appro\nng the application would not set any precedent, based on the histwy and unique set of circumstances surrounding the property which justified the hardship. PAGE6ofl8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 28,2003 7:00 o'clock p.m. (RICHARD S. BROWN, 1300 SHORELINE DRIVE, Continued) GafTron pointed out that some of the hardcover was not in place until the end of construction and agreed that the City did have some culpability, since the site was not inspected for over one year and neighbors had called to complain, although not necessarily about the hardcover specifically. Murphy encouraged staff to draft a resolution that makes it clear to builders that they cannot pull a stunt like this and the City will allow it on behalf of the new owners. Attorney Barrett commented that this is the third time this same issue has been addressed recently. He reminded the Council that hardships e.xtend from the land and that it is difllcult to assign hardships to circumstances. Mayor Peterson stated that she viewed the application differently than the previous applications, since this is the new owner versus a current builder/owner. White suggested the City consider invoking some kind of financial penalty to builders who disregard or go beyond what is allowed. Sansevere agreed, stating that some communities do have fine provisions. Barrett acknowledged that this is becoming a problem and suggested the Council determine a way to gain control of the issue. Murphy moved, Mayor Peterson seconded, to approve the Planning Commission recommendation for Application M)3-2904, Richard S. Brown, 1300 Shoreline Drive, approval of after-the-fact variances for the revised removal plan, subject to conditions noted, acknowledging that the hardship is granted solely on specific circumstances of this case, as the owner was not the builder or owner at the time, but trying to accommodate the hardcover provisions after the fact. In addition, noting that the City will take a look at the process used to work with builders in the future. Brown suggested the City look at its process, since he was merely called by the City Attorney at 4PM the night before his closing and told there were problems, long after his first inquiry. He noted, too, that the City Attorney was hesitant to even tell him, the potential owner, what was wTong. He pointed out that a pump station exists directly across from the property and felt there was many opportunities for the City to have seen red flags. Attorney Barrett indicated that he had asked to speak to Brown's attorney, since it would be considered unethical to speak to him if he had representation. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *6. #03-2906 RICHARD ROBERTS, 1937 EAGERNESS POINT ROAD - AFTER-THE- FACT VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 5009 Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5009, a Resointion granting approval of a two-tiered retaining wall replacement on house tide of road, with PAGE 7 of 18 s . I I i MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 28,2003 7:00 o’clock p.m. (RICHARD ROBERTS, 1937 EAGERNESS POINT ROAD, Continued) landKaping/Krcening to soften the visual impact; denial of the variance to allow the retaining walls on the lakeside of the street; however, approval to construct a 4 ’ side stairway, 10 cubic yards of All In the 0-75* zone to allow that area to become bwn, maintain the slope, and revegetate slope. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 7.003-2907 JEFF AND CARA ZIEBARTH, 720 NORTH ARM DRIVE • VARIANCES Gaflron stated that the applicants provided a new plan on July 14 for review by the Planning Commission at its July 21 Meeting which reduced the number and magnitude of variances needed to construct a second story addition and attached garage to the existing residence. The variances required by the most recent revised plan include: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Second story structure encroaching within 0-75* setback zone, 65* from shoreline. Second story structure encroaching 4.3 feet from left side lot line. Second story structure encroaching 2.4 feet from right side lot line. Attached garage addition and grading 6 feet from left side lot line (rather than 4') and moved back toward existing house footprint to avoid encroaching sewer line easement. Remove existing 423 s.f deck in 0-75* zone, replace with a smaller 95 s.f deck still slightly encroaching average setback line. Hardcover in 0-75' zone will be reduced from 1058 s.f. (29.4%) to 535.31 s.f. (14.8%) where no hardcover is allowed, by reducing deck steps and concrete slab areas. Hardcover in 75-250' zone will be reduced from 2257.1 s.f (51.9%) to 1961.38 s.f (45.1%) where 25% is normally allowed. Changes not requiring variances include: > Lot coverage by structures reduced from 1870 s.f (23.5%) to exactly 1500 s.f where 1500 s.f is allowed (no variance required). > Total hardcover as a percent of 75-250' zone will reduce from the existing 3315 s.f (76.3%) to 2496 s.f (57%). Gaffron indicated that the Planning Commission voted 7-0 to make the following recommendation; 1) Denial of the 4' side setback variances for the attached garage addition to encroach w ithin 6’ of the left lot line, as it could be still shifted to meet a 10’ setback with some interior design changes. 2) Denial of the side setback variance for second sto.'y of structure to encroach within 4.3 ’ of left side of lot line, and 2.4’ of right side lot line, because the resulting structure would tend to overshadow adjoining properties and lead to future maintenance issues. 3) Approval of the second story addition encroachment of the 75' lakeshore setback, 65’ from the shoreline. !lI!!l i PAGE 8 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 28,2003 7:00 o ’clock p.m. (JEFF AND CARA ZIEBARTH, 720 NORTH ARM DRIVE, Continued) 4) Approval of the hardcover variances as proposed, as this plan reflects what appears to be the minimum hardcover necessary to support a reasonable residence on the property as follows: a) Hardcover in 0-75’ zone will be reduced from 1058 s.f. (29.4%) to 535.31 s.f. (14.8%) where no hardcover is allowed, by reducing deck steps and concrete slab areas. b) Hardcover in 75-250’ zone will be reduced from 2257.1 s.f. (51.9%) to 1961.38 s.f. (45.1%) where 25% is normally allowed. 5) Applicant must provide a suitable drainage plan to be developed prior to review by the Council. 6) Approval of the removal of the existing 423 s.f. deck in 0-75’ zone, subject to replacement with a smaller 95 s.f. deck as proposed, still slightly encroaching the average setback line. Gaffron pointed out that neighbors were present during both the recent Planning Commission Meetings and objected to the 2.4’ and 4’ variances from the side lot lines. He indicated that, if the structure were a tear down, the new home would need to be built 10' from either side on a 40' wide lot. Ms. Ziebarth had nothing to add. She pointed out that they had redesigned the home to meet the 10 ’ setbacks as required by staff and the Planning Commission. She asked that they be allowed a bit of leniency for the overhangs of the house, since they had gone to great lengths to meet the other restrictions. Mayor Peterson indicated her support for the revisions and asked Gaflron if he had the newest plans. Gaffron stated that he would review the plans and could support an overhang encroachment. Grc:; Harding, 700 North .Arm Drive, asked if the current grading plan met with the engineer’s approval. Gaffron indicated that he believed the drainage plan could be accomplished based on the reduction in hardcover and assured the neighbor that it would be reviewed. Kirk Ottesan, 710 North Arm Drive, asked if the new plan would meet the side setback requirements. Gaffron stated that he would meet w ith the applicants; however, the new plan could be tweaked to do so. PAGE 9 of 18 ■ { i ____J I MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 28,2003 7:00 o’clock p.m. (JEFF AND CARA ZIEBARTH, 720 NORTH ARM DRIVE, Continued) While moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Applkalion iN)3-2907, Jeff and Cara Ziebarth, 720 North Arm Drive, subject to the Planning Commission recommendations 1*5 a and b, and 6, to construct a second story addition and attached garage to the residence. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *8. #03-2909 PLEKKF.NPOt BUILDERS INC. ON BEHALF OF TOM MCGLYNN, 3980 DAHI. ROAD, - AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. SOI I Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. SOI I, a Resolution granting the replacement of the renovated boathouse structure to its pre-existing location for unique reasons documented in the resolution. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *9. #03-2910 WAYNE AND ANNE JOHNSON, 1225 LAKEVIEW AVENUE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 5010 Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5010, a Resolution approving a side yard variance to encroach 15* into the side yard setback where a 30’ setback is required for the residence located at 1225 Lakeview Avenue. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *10. #03-2911 PETER AND LISA RYSKAMP, 1080 WILDHURST TRAIL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 5012 blurpby moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5012, a Resolution granting a Conditional Use Permit to allow the replacement of an existing permanent piling dock which Is deteriorating and poorly located in relation to neighboring docks for the home located at 1080 Wildhurst Trail. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *11. #03-2912 MARVIN AND MARY S.M1TH, 1940 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD - VAIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 5013 Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5013, a Resolution granting side/front yard setback variances for the propertv- located at 1940 Country Club Road. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *12. #03-2913 STEWART AND GINA HANSEN. 583 PARK LANE - VARIANCE RESOLUTION NO. 5014 Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5014, a Resointlon granting approval of the 5* side yard variance subject to the applicants making a fkirther -aduction in hardcover by matching the square footage reductions approved for their lakeside deck. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. PAGE 10 of 18 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 28,2003 7:00 o ’clock p.m. *13. #03-2915 NORTHERN SUNROOMS, INC. ON BEHALF OF SCOTT UDELL 2166 SHADYWOOD ROAD - VARIANCE -RESOLUTION NO. 5015 Murphy moved, Sanscvere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5015, a Resolution granting approvai of the 8* variances from the average lakeshore setback and the 2* variance for the eave encroachment for the property iocated at 2166 Shadywood Road., VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 14. #03-2916 PHILLIP SMITH, 2600 WEST LAFAYETTE ROAD - VARIANCE GafTron explained that the applicant requests a lakeshore setback variance to construct a second story addition partially within 75' of the shoreline, and hardcover variances for an attached garage and a porch addition. The applicant has proposed to remove 1 s.f. of existing 0-75’ hardcover for each 2 s.f. of proposed new hardcover in the 75-250’, i.e. a 1:2 removal ratio which would result in a 300 s.f. net increase in hardcover on the site. GafTron indicated that the Planning Commission reviewed this item on July 21 and recommended approval of the upper level additions in the 0-75’ zone, finding that the visual impact of those additions is decreased by constructing them in a '/s story configuration, and noting that the existing home being partially in the 0-75’ zone is the hardship. In addition, the Planning Commission further recommended that a hardcover variance be approved for the porch and garage additions only in conjunction with concurrent removals of hardcover in a ratio of 1:1 to result in no net hardcover increase on the site. The Planning Commission also recommended that the shed in the 0-75’ setback zone be removed as part of the removals and that all landscape plastic/fabric be removed. Gaffron acknowledged the memo of support from the applicant's neighbors. Murphy asked how the 600 s.f. would be removed from the site. Gaffron indicated that, likely, the shed of 100’ would be removed from the 0-75’. He noted that removals from the 75-250' were difficult to come up with, since much of the home is located in the 0-75’ zone and because the driveway accesses a private driveway/roadway with limited parking. He noted that the applicant would probably lose much of his patio. Smith reminded the Couneil to consider the uniqueness of his lot, which it is in character and reminiscent to the 1950's style of the lake. He noted that it is more than 300' to the nearest public right of way for additional parking; therefore, he found it difficult to remove significant portions of his driveway. Smith pointed out that if his home were on a conforming I acre parcel, it would be allowed 7,800 s.f of hardcover, and if it were a tear down it would be easier to reduce hardcover. He maintained that his home was not a tear down and, in fact, unique in that it was not another tall structure. He argued that the City, PAGE 11 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 28,2003 7:00 o'clock p.m. (PHILLIP SMITH, 2600 WEST LAFAYETTE ROAD, Continued) with its existing codes, is forcing people to build a bunch of tall tight structures on the lake by requiring 25% in the 75-250' etc. He questioned whether this was good for the character of the lake community. Beyond reductions in hardcover. Smith indicated that he would be willing to redirect water flow from his home away from the lake via downspouts which would run to the back side of his property. He asked that, if he was required to remove 300 s.f. or more, that he choose how it be removed from the 0-75' versus being forced to remove the shed which compliments the house. Smith acknowledged that the P‘i:nning Commission told him the Council would likely turn him down, but he wished to present his case nonetheless. He felt his home and addition nv>intained the original lake character of the lake as designed and asked to be given his variances. Murphy questioned whether water diversion could really help offset the hardcover as proposed. Gaflron pointed out that water runoff either runs toward the lake or away from the lake on this site and could all be directed one way or the other. He stated this is unique to this site, in that water could infiltrate before it hits the lake. Smith stated that the patio is stone with adequate spacing for infiltration, he reiterated that his was not a grand home. White questioned whether the City had ever entertained removal ratios of other than 1 :1 in the past. Gaflron stated that, typically, the City has gone for 1 :1 ratios to obtain equal trades. He indicated that he would have to struggle to find any other similar cases historically. Sansevere asked if it could be done 1:1. Gaffron stated that patio removals could be made, perhaps some driveway removals, but few others. White suggested the applicant remove a portion of the driveway and allow people to park on the grass as he does. Smith stated that his screened in porch was a more important feature than the others. He asked, if the City was not willing to accept anything other than a 1:1 removal ratio, even though his lot was annexed to the City fiom Navarre and legally platted as it was, was PAGE 12 of 18 > . ti ;! • I ( i f 1 ^i ^ • i- 'I j MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 28,2003 7:00 o ’clock p.m. (PHILLIP SMITH, 2600 WEST LAFAYETTE ROAD, Cootloucd) allowed less hardcover than other surrounding communities, and not a big apparent hardcover issue, how they would suggest he proceed. GafTron stated that the hardship is limited, since the home is being put to a reasonable use as it exists. He believed some reductions could be made in the 0-75* zone, but also recognized the points made by the applicant that Orono ’s standards are difficult to meet. He agreed (hat, unfortunately, hardcover often forces people to build up which causes massing concerns. Murphy empathized with the applicant, acknowledging that the house is placed nicely on the lot. He recognized that the City seems to be creating a situation that the nice ramblers of this type will soon disappear to be replaced by tall stovetops unless the City can begin to find real ways to remove hardcover issues. He believed he must concur with the Planning Commission recommendation and suggested the applicant consider other options for removal. White liked the proposed improvements and felt stuck between setting a new precedent, even though redirection of water flow might warrant an even greater than 1:1 removal ratio. Mayor Peterson stated that she was also leaning towards the Planning Commission recommendation. Smith asked if he were to build the porch initially, whether he could be allowed to do some nips and tucks to his proposal on the left side. He asked if the Council would allow him to remove the equal amounts of hardcover from his property wherever he was able to do so, be it the lakeside, backside, etc. to complete construction. The Council agreed. White moved, Murphy seconded, to approve Application #03-2916, Phillip Smith, 26(H) W est Lafayette Road, granting the upper level additions in the 0-75* zone and variances for the staged porch and garage additions in conjunction with concurrent removals of hardcover in a ratio of 1:1 to result in no net hardcover increase on the site. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *15. #03-2918 BRUCE SINGER, 330 TONKA AVENUE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 5016 Murphy moved, Saosevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5016, a Resolution granting the lot area and lot width variances to construct a 2260 s.f. single family home at 330 Tonka Avenue on the .43 acre lot with a defined width of ISO’. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. PAGE 13 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 28,2003 7:00 o ’clock p.m. *16.1I03-2921 STUART MACDONALD, MACDONALD AND MACK ARCHITECTS, LTD. ON BEHALF OF EDWARD HAMM, 485 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD SOUTH - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 5017 Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5017, a Resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit subject to meeting the 50’ rear yard setback requirement, which is the only standard required by the Zoning Ordinance, for the property located at 485 Orono Orchard Road South. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *17. #03-2924 TODD SMITH ON BEHALF OF JIM AND JULIE HARSTAD, 4550 WOLVERTON PLACE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 5018 Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5018, a Resolution granting the After-the-Fact variance to construct an accessory gazebo/shed structure nearer to the street lot line than the existing residence located at 4550 Wolverton Place. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. MAYOR/CITY COUNCIL REPORT Murphy nrported that he had been contacted by Mrs. Dahlquist, the comer neighbor at Willow and County Road 6, to inform him of two serious accidents at the intersection this past week. The motorcyclist from the accident is in serious condition and Mrs. Dahlquist was concerned about the traffic and speed along those roadways. Murphy encourag^ staff to double its efforts with the County to measure the traffic counts and correct the intersection. He expressed concern that the only way to obtain authorization for a semophore is to get the car count up, but questioned the logic, when our efforts should be to save lives. Moorse summarized the progress on the Willow and County Road 6 intersection. While he irdicated that ongoing discussions with the County show that the comer falls short of the warrants for a signal, he noted that the City would be conducting a feasibility study to put in turn lanes next year. He stated that the City plans to do as much prep work as it can for the eventual installation of signals. He stated that they will continue to monitor traffic counts and pursue posting some signage, although the County does not believe signage to be helpful. Moorse pointed out that, in fact, the City is considering installing a four way stop sign at the intersection; however, traffic backups might be an issue. Sansevere questioned where or how most of the accidents occur. Gappa stated that accidents occur east and westbound on Willow, as well as, north and southbound on County Road 6. PAGE 14ofl8 ufikoa MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 28,2003 7:00 o’clock p.m. (MAYOR/CITY COUNCIL REPORT, Continued) Moorse stated that the County has indicated that this intersection is not one of their priorities in comparison to many others. He asked Gappa how the accident rate plays into the list of priorities. Gappa stated that the intersection falls in the above average category; however, is not high enough to warrant a signal. He indicated that more and more people call about this intersection, and at the risk of inconveniencing motorists, they may need to post the stop signs to save lives; even at the risk of upsetting commuters who will have to wait at the signs. He was confident it would not be long until the City met the tralTlc counts and speed to warrant the signal lights. Moorse indicated he would talk to Police Chief Good about additional speed enforcement and us of the speed traffic trailer. Sansevere agreed that a stronger police presence would impact speeds in a hurry. White reported that he had accompanied the Minnesota Historical Society on a tour of several lake structures, including the Cable ice house. Casco Point, etc. He stated that the initial reaction of the Historical Society was that the ice house was 70 years old and they would report back to the City within a few days as to their opinion. Sansevere stated that, in his opinion, these old structures add to the charm and character of the lake. He felt the City should spend some additional time discussing the possibility of exempting some of these structures from the hardcover requirements in order to preserve that era of the lakes history regarding its historical significance. GafTron acknowledged that the City still must perform an inventory to determine what is worth saving and define standards that the City wants to use in its determination whether something stays or goes. He suggested the City consider whether they would like to own these things. Mayor Peterson reported on a recent LMCD meeting she had attended. Du. ing the meeting, the LMCD passed a resolution saying that the water patrol could install buoys for a third and fourth safety channel. In addition, she reported that discussion took place regarding the installation of a line of yellow shoreline buoys, or ’no anchoring zone’. She indicated that more would be discussed at the August 23*27 meeting. Sansevere stated that he was not in favor of the shoreline ‘no anchoring zone’ prohibiting boat parking near the shore. He felt that to be a safety hazard and discouraging to all families who want to frequent Big Island. He agreed that enforcement of the 4 channels would be critical to their success, but was concerned where and w'hat impact the shoreline corridor might have. PAGE IS of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 28,2003 7:00 o’clock p.m. (MAYOR/CITY COUNCIL REPORT, Continued) White believed tickets should be written to those in violation, or anchor ropes cut of those who choose not to follow the regulations. PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR'S REPORT *18. SPATES AVENUE LIFT STATION CONTROL PANEL Murphy moved, Sansevcre seconded, to accept the quotation from Electric Pump, Minneapolis for Spates Avenue Lift Station Control Panel Replacement in the amount of $19,926 to be funded from the Sewer Fund with approval of a Sewer Fund budget adjustment to reflect this expenditure. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *19. REQUEST FOR PAYMENT #2 - SCADA SYSTEM Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the Request for Payment Number 2, SCADA System Project to Automatic Systems Company in the amount of $61,081.20. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT *20. REQUEST FOR PAYMENT - NAVARRE FIRE STATION Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the request for payment of Payment Application No. 1 for the Navarre Fire Station, in the amount of $24312.28, to DEW Corporation, the General Contractor, to be funded from the Navarre Fire Station Construction Account. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 21. LONG LAKE FIRE STATION STORMWATER DRA1.NAGE OPTIONS Muq)hy implored the Council to give further consideration to their options, and not vote for option 1 simply because of the price tag. He reminded the Council that the City has spent $3 million on this fire station and should ensure that the right solution is done, not just the cheapest. He maintained that Rochon did not meet the design, that the curb needs to be redone, and more investigation needs to occur. He believed that the City needs to have a grasp of what else is going on, and take a measured approach of its options. Sansevere asked if the City could begin with option 1 and flow into option 2 if it is necessary. He asked why they should discount Bill Wolters suggestions. White agreed that there was not enough information in front of the Council for them to make an informed decision. He felt the options were too broad, jumping from $8,000- $35,000. PAGE 16 of 18 r MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 28,2003 7:00 o’clock p.m. (LONG LAKE FIRE STATION STORMWATER DRAINAGE OPTIONS, Continued) As is not currently the case, Murphy maintained that the City needs to have the north comer built right. He pointed out that many ’experts’ and others disagree on what is an adequate solution. He asked the Council to avoid making a decision in a big hurry without adequate information. lie wondered if the observations made by laymen all along may have been right. Gappa stated that he, Engineer Kellogg, and Moorse had visited the site that morning to see whether option I or 2 was better than the other. He indicated that they believed more information was necessary to make that recommendation. Mayor Peterson indicated that she would discuss the options and situation with Mayor Shafer later in the week. Moorse indicated that the entrances on the north, west, and east, were all in need of a solution. He stated that if Option 1 or 2 are to be considered, the City needs to take a look at the different slope grades to determine how it was supposed to have worked. He stated that it may end up costing $35,000 to get the slope .steeper and directed away from the building. He acknowledged that there was much work to be done, that the curb, concrete, part of the roadway, etc. would need to be tom out and he wanted to ensure that what is put back is appropriate. Murphy moved. Mayor Peterson seconded, to table the selection of an option for addressing site drainage issues at the north side of the Long Lake Fire Station. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Murphy reiterated that there are serious problems with the north, west, east, and backside of the building and suggested a survey be done for the whole site. Moorse stated that the City needs to ensure that they have a representative present throughout the entire process on behalf of the city’s interests. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT Attorney Barrett indicated that the City would be puisuing litigation against the Cables. White asked that the fence be included in the list of items not removed to date. PAGE 17 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 28,2003 7:00 o’clock p.m. *22. UCENSES SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS A 1. Applicant: Event: Location: Date: Time: Maria Swenson Birthday Party and Live Music for SO - 75 Guests 87S Forest Anns Lane Saturday, August 9,2003 6:00 p.m. • 1 1:30 P.M. Murphy moved, Sauscvcrc seconded, to approve the special event permit requested by Ms. Swenson. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT 2. Applicant: Brian McCoIIor/Jarrod Sokolowski - Gear West Ski & Run Event: Com Days Annual 4 Mile Run Location: Hackber^ Park, Brown Road South and Willow Drive Date: Sunday, August 10,2003 Time: 11:00 a.m.-12:30 p.m.. Murphy moved, Sauscvcrc seconded, to approve the special event permit for Gear West Ski & Run, Com Days Annual 4 Mile Run. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *23.BILLS Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to adjourn the Oroao City Council Meeting of July 28,2003 at 10:03 P.M. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara Peterson. Mayor PAGE 18 of 18 2800 2400 ^ 2000 ri 1600 I 1200 800 400 0 I I I I 1 I 1^1 AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, AUGUST It, 2003,7:00 PJVI. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Coun under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in t Public Packet - located on the counter near the sipi in sheet ROLL CALL CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approve^Amend APPROVAL OF MINUTES • 2. Regular Council Meeting ofjuly 28,2003 ________________________' AUG 1 1 2003 CITY Or UHcnuO PARK CO.MMISSION COMMENTS - Pat Wolfe, RepresenUlive PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Sandy Smith, RepresenUtIve PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minnies Per Penon) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 3. 803*2893 JohnandRobertaHeiuich, 4123 Highwood Road —Variance— Resolution • 4. 803-2893 Gaiy Cermundsen, 4101 Highwood Road - Variance - Denial Resolution • 3. 803-2904 RichatdS.Brown, 1300ShorelineDrive-Variance-Resolution 6. 803-2907 Jeff and Cara ZiebatOi, 720 North Arm Drive - Variances - Revised Plan • 7. 803-2916 Phillip Smith, 2600 West Lnlayctle Road-Variance-Resolution • 8. 803*2920 St Edward's Episcopal Church, 863 Femdale Road North-Conditional Use P«tc - Resolution AUYOR/COUNCIL REPORT PUBUC SERVICE DIRECTOR’S REPORT 9. Accept Quotations Navarre Sidewalk Project 10. Approve County Road 6 Feasibility Report CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 11. Request for Payment - Navarre Fire Station 12. Adopt New Code for the City of Orono — Ordinance 13. Support of Partnership to Address Substance Abuse - Reiolulioa 14. Saga Hill Park Land Exchange 15. Release of Conservation Easement - Fleming Trail Addition CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT • 16. LICENSES AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, AUGUST 11,2003,7:00 P3I ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA • 17. BILLS UPCOaMING ISSUES AND EVTNTS mi 08/06 - Council Work Session, 5:30 p.m. 08/06 - Planning Commission Work Session, 5:30 pjn. 08/07 - Council Work Session, 5 JO p.m. 08/U - Council Meeting. 7:00 p.m. 08/18 - Planning Commission Meeting, 6:00 p.m. OS/25 - CourKil Meeting, 7:00 p m. 09/01 - HOLIDAY, Observance of Labor Day 09/02 - Park Commission Meeting, Park Tour, 5:30 p.m. 09/03 - Planning Commiaaton Work Seuion, 5:30 p jn. 08/08 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.in. 08/15 - Planning Commission Meeting, 6:00 pja. 08/22 - Council Meeting. 7:00 pjn. Application Received: 4/18/03 Application Complete: S/7/03 Initial 60 Day Deadline: 7/7/03 Eitended Deadiine: 9/7/03 COit REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AUG 1 1 2003 CITY Ut Ohuivu Date: August 7,2003 Item No.: ^ Department Approvai: Name: Michael P. Gaffron Title: Planning Director Administrator Approval:Agenda ^^ertion: Zoning Item Description: //03-2893 John & Roberta Ilcnrich, 4I2S Highwood Road • Variances - Resolution Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) 28,648 s.r. (0.66 acre) Application Summary: The applicants propose to remove the existing house and construct a new house on the property, but keep the existing garage and other amenities in place. Variances required include lot width, average lakeshore setback, accessory structure without a principal structure during construction, blufTsetback, and hardcover. List of Exhibits A - Final Revised Site Plan B • Resolution C - Notice of Platming Commission Action 7-30-03 D - Memo and Exhibits of July 17,2003 Planning Commission Recommendation This application was initially reviewed at the May Planning Commission meeting; Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the variances for lot area, average setback and accessory structure without a principal structure during construction, but tabled the hardcover variance to allow applicant to work with staff to reduce hardcover to nearer the 25% limit. Applicants met with Building Inspector Bruce Vang on the site and were able to devise a plan meeting the Planning Commission’s goals. A revised site plan was submitted and reviewed at the July PC meeting; the plan slightly revised the proposed house location, and made substantial revisions to the driveway and pailcing areas on the property, which reduces hardcover in the 75-250' zone from the existing 37.1% to just over 28%. Planning Commission voted 7-0 to approve the revised plan with a bluff setback encroachment of 4* for the house, and subject to reconfiguration of the deck to meet a 15* setback from the top of bluff, and removal of the 8’xl2' shed in the 0-75' zone, leaving that zone with 683 s.f. or 5.7%, primarily in walkways and retaining walls needed to retain slopes and provide access to the take. IV03-2S93 Hcnrich Attf lut 7,2003 Page 2 ,) Planning Commission indicated that the hardships supporting the 75-250' zone hardcover variance to allow more than 25% hardcover for this teardown-rebuild include the steep slopes which limit the house location and require walls and walkways; the topography near the road and the elevation and conflguration of the existing garage which will remain, and the need to provide safe access to the property while retaining adequate parking on-site since the narrow Highwood Road is inadequate for parking. Staff Rccomincndation Applicant has provided a flnal revised site plan which incorporates the reconfigured deck to meet the Planning Commission recommendation. Staff recommends approval per the Planning Commission recommendation. A resolution for approval is attached. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt or amend the attached resolution. \V \ \ vV, \ retaining \ 9 fi rv v/all s 4*04'V B —f84^ is\ \ X p/UftC ^fn? fLA^ 7-2s*'03 •••• •*“ 9P01 ' —n !•(—169/ snvM V 0NiN/w3a-—iVv<'»7 1 ‘N^ >I301B y>s\ Of \ ao. \- \- ^ 8^V a:.Ji Hi / w- N* \ \ \ ~096- \ \Vr \ ^ \\ »' \ VM \\ \ c% oi <j» ^ wu ' Cjh-io >»■ \ i\\- \ \- \ ^ ^ >rs ^ \ /’W\\ m 05 Ol-rA t ycj \ § o \ \i 'S^'Si J1. / ? O] / 2I\si--r-^ -4 -i- ~ '%-j — —^ -X ^ _i I ^ 2 e i io ii ln\? 'i -fg- ■niVnl > T ^ I *I ^ \ u> I 1 * i''' ^ V-\] \ i J: \ \ \ \\ 'l 1 •3Nn dond ^o y^ewu 3dV0SQNVl ''jd^vQ\' onusixj \- I h\ r f}■ / / / T i ir / " \ JfC -r \ \. \ 3snoH 0NUSIX3 ^ CJ eg / / '/ ' \ \\ \ \ 9 V \ J6ZI \ \ \ /-" \ \ \ rr7 u s A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9(A); 10.24, SUBDIVISION SB; 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2; AND 10.56, SUBDIVISIONS 16(CK2,3 & 6) AND 16(L), FILE NO. 03-2893 WHEREAS, John W. Henrich and Roberta J. Henrich, husband and wife (hereinafter "the applicants"), are the owners of the property located at 4125 Highwood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows: Lots 19,20 and 21, Highwood Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota; (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24 Subdivision SB to allow construction of a new residence to replace a pre-existing residence on a lot containing 0.66 acres in area in the LR-IB Zoning District where a 1.0 acre minimum lot area is required; and a variance to Sections 10.22 Subd. 2,10.55 Subd. Sand 10.56 Subd. 16(L)(1&2) to allow 5.7% hardcover in the 0-75* lakeshorc zone where no hardcover is normally allowed, and to allow 28.2% hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore zone where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed; and a variance to Section 10.56 Subd. 16(C)(2&3) to allow structural encroachment within a bluff impact zone and structural encroachment of a required 30' bluff setback; and a variance to Sectional 0.22, Subd. 1 (B) and 10.56 Subd. 16(CX6) to allow an encroachment of the average lakeshore setback; and a variance to Section 10.03, Subd. 9(A) to allow an accessory structure to remain without a principal structure during construction. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, HNDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as 2U>ning File #03-2893. Page 1 of« 2. 3. 4. The property is located in the LR-IB Lakeshore Residential Zoning District, which requires minimum lot area of 1.0 acres and minimum lot width of 140'. The lot has a defined width of 157* at the OHWL and ISO* at the 75* setback line, but is only 28,648 s.f. (0.66 acres) in area. The Planning Commission initially reviewed this application at a public hearing held on May 19,2003 and on a vote of 5-0 recommended approval of the variances for lot area, average setback and accessory structure without a principal structure during construction, but tabled the hardcover and bluff impact variance to allow applica. * to reduce hardcover to nearer the 25% limit. The Planning Commission reviewed the applicants' revised proposal on July 21,2003 and on a vote of 7-0 recommended approval of hardcover in the amount of 28.2% in the 75-250’ zone; approval of 5.7% hardcover in the 0-75* zone subject to removal of the existing 8'x 12' shed in that zone; approval of a 4* encroachment of the required 30* bluff setback for the new house, subject to reconfiguring the existing deck to be located no closer than 15* from the top of bluff where a 30' setback is required; these approvals being based on the following findings: a)A house has existed on the property for many decades. The lot area of 0.66 acres is sufficient to allow constniction of a new residence on the site. The property is served by municipal sewer. The property contains an existing residence structure and detached garage. The house will be removed by the applicant in order to construct a new residence on the property. The applicant intends to re-use the existing garage, which is relatively new, in good condition, and conforming in location, but which is oriented and elevated in relation to Highwood Road in a manner which requires substantial driveway to be functional and provide for safe access while providing off-street parking needed because Highwood Road is very narrow. The applicant has agreed to reconfigure the driveway to reduce its associated excessive hardcover. The site contains a bluff feature. A small portion of the proposed house will be located 26' from the top of bluff where a 30' setback is required. An existing deck serving the house is 2' from the top of bluff. This deck will be reconfigured to meet a 15' setback from top of bluff The bluff impact zone Page 2 of? 5. 6. and setback encroachments are necessary to allow the house to be located where it will allow for minimizing the driveway hardcover on the street side of the house. Existing hardcover in the 0-75' zone includes retaining walls, stairways and landings which are necessary to maintain the steep slopes and provide access to the lake. The applicant proposes to keep 683 s.f. of wails, stairways and landings resulting in a 0-75' hardcover of 5.7%. The applicant has agreed to remove an existing 8'xl2' shed in the 0-75' zone. Existing hardcover in the 75-250' zone is 6,180 s.f. or 37.1 %. Final proposed hardcover in the 75-250' zone is 4,690 s.f. or 28.2%. The hardships supporting the 75-250' zone hardcover variance include the steep slopes which limit the house location and require walls and walkways; the topography near the road and the elevation and configuration of the existing garage which will remain, and the need to provide safe access to the property while retaining adequate parking on-site since the narrow Highwood Road is inadequate for parking. The average lakcshore setback encroachment of approximately 12' for the proposed house will have no impact on views of the lake enjoyed by the adjacent property owners. The proposed reconfigured deck is low enough to similarly have no view impacts. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 3 of 7 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24 Subdivision 5B to allow construction of a new residence to replace a pre-existing residence on a lot containing 0.66 acres in area in the LR- 1B Zoning District where a 1.0 acre minimum lot area is required; and a variance to Sections 10.22 Subd. 2,10.55 Subd.Sand 10.56 Subd. 16(L)(1&2) to allow 683 s.f. (5.7%) hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore zone where no hardcover is normally allowed, and to allow 4,690 s.f. (28.2%) hardcover in the 75-250’ lakeshore zone where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed; and a vanance to Section 10.56 Subd. 16(C)(2&3) to allow the proposed house to encroach 4' into the required 30' bluff setback, and a deck to encroach 15' into the 30' bluff setback and 5' into the 20' bluff impact zone; and a variance to Sections 10.22, Subd. 1(B) and 10.56 Subd. 16(CX6) to allow a 12' encroachment of the average lakeshore setback for the house; and a variance to Section 10.03, Subd. 9(A) to allow the accessory structure (detached garage) to remain without a principal structure during construction; subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicant and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Any changes from the approved site plan which are not in conformity with this approval or City requirements will require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2. Hardcover on the property shall not exceed the limits as noted in this resolution. Applicant is advised that any future proposals for additional hardcover on the property will likely not be approved, but might be approved only in conjunction with concurrent hardcover removals to result in no net hardcover increase on the property. All hardcover removals required to meet the terms of this resolution shall be completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the new residence. 3. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (August 11,2004). 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 4 of? STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this__day of ,2003 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of.^2003 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 6 of7 V • ' ■ . STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of . 2003, personally {^>peared before me, ____who is personally known to me ____whose identity I proved on the basis of, whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation of. a credible witness and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ■ ^1 On this day of 2003, personally appeared before me, ____who is personally known to me ____whose identity I proved on the basis of, whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation of. a credible wimess and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public Page 7 of7 [iTimiiiiMiiiiiaMiiaiMiUr'illiiyiirii i htmiitiii i imiiitii c CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 (952) 249-4600 ZONING nLE: ^03-2893 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE; July 30, 2003' TO: John & Roberta Henrich 4125 Highwood Road Orono, MN 55364 COPIES: TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances DATE OF MEETING: July 21, 2003 Planning Commission recommended as follows: Approval of variances for lot width and accessory structure w/o principal structure during construction. Approval of average lakeshore setback variance for revised house location 4* closer to lake than prior plan. Existing deck to be reconfigured to meet 15' minimum setback to top of bluff. Hardcover proposal at 28.2% in 75-250' zone is acceptable, based on the hardships of existing property layout, the need to provide safe access to the site, and site topography. Approval is conditioned on removal of the shed in the 0-75* zone. VOTE: 7 FOR 0 AGAINST We are in receipt of your revised plan meeting the conditions established by the Planning Commission. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council - Monday, August 11, 2003; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. If you have questions, please call Planning Director Mike Gaflron at 952-249-4600. Si I Application Received: 4/18/03 Application Complete: 5/7/03 Initial 60 Day Deadline: 7/7/03 Eitended DeadUne: 9/7/03 0'7-O2 TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: Mike Gaffron, Planning Director July 17,2003 SUBJECT: ^3*2893 John & Roberta Henrich, 4125 Highwood Road* Variances Revised Proposal - Continuation of Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) 28,648 s.f. (0.66 acre) Application Summary: The applicants propose to remove the existing house and construct a new house on the property. This application was reviewed at the May Planning Commission meeting; Planning Commission voted S-0 to recommend approval of the variances for lot width, average setback and accessory structure without a principal structure during construction; and voted 5*0 to table at applicant’s request to allow him to work with City staff to find ways to reduce hardcover on the property to nearer the 25% limit. A revised site plan has been submitted which substantially reduces hardcover in the 75*250’ zone from the existing 37.1% to just over 28%. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends: 1. Approval of the average setback variance for the revised location, finding no impacts to lake views enjoyed by neighboring property owners. 2. Approval of the revised hardcover plan for 28% hardcover in the 75*250' zone, if Planning Commission can make a hardship distinction between this proposal and other total rebuilds that have been held to the 25% limit. Approve proposal to make no changes to 0-75' zone hardcover. 3. Approval of the 4’ encroachment of the house into the 30' bluff setback. Note that only a small protrusion of the house will encroach the bluff setback. 4. Planning Commission should advise applicant whether replacement of the deck in kind within the bluff setback would be looked upon favorably. List of Exhibits A - Revised site plan and removals, and revised Hardcover calculation sheets B - May 19 PC Minutes C * Notice of Planning Commission Action 5-28*03 D - Memo and Exhibits of May 15,2003 Review of Revised Site Plan Applicant has worked with Building Inspector Bruce Vang to devise a revised site plan that reconfigures the driveway access to the site. Much of the excess hardcover on the property is related to the location and elevation of the existing garage, which is relatively new and which applicant does not plan to remove. The new site plan in Exhibit A results in a 20' eastward relocation of the driveway access point onto Highwood Road, allowing for removal of a major portion of the existing driveway while maintaining a functional access to the garage and house, and retaining usable parking area. , •i «03-29«l 4l2SHIghwo«dRoad July 17,2003 Page 2 As noted in May, the house footprint will increase from 1219 to 1635 s.f. Structural coverage including the garage, house and shed will only be 8.3% where 15% is allowed. Bluff Setback . The revised site plan has an alternate version that moves the house about 4' closer to the lake than proposed in May. This proposal would allow for additional green space between the house and the driveway. However, this also results in a 4' encroachment of the 30* bluff setback, as the existing house is at a 32' bluff setback and the initial proposal just met the 30' requirement (see Exhibit G-2 of May 15 memo). The existing deck encroaches within 2' of the top of bluff, and is proposed to remain in place. If the existing deck remains in place, it has a legal nonconforming status in regard to the bluff setback, as it was constructed in 1990, prior to the 1992 adoption of bluff ordinances as part of the Shoreland ordinance. If it is replaced, it will require a variance to the required 30' top-of-bluff setback requirement for structures. Average Setback . Planning Commission recommended approval of the average setback for the house location proposed in May. The revised location 4' closer to the lake still has virtually no impacts on neighbor ’s views of the lake due to topography and the orientation of those neighboring homes. Existing 0-75' Zone Amenities . Existing retaining walls, concrete or flagstone walkways and stairways in the 0-75' zone are in good condition and no changes are proposed. The 0-75' zone also contains an 8'x 12' shed and an area of landscape timbers surrounding planting beds near the shore. The existing 0-75' landscaping has been developed for many years and is a unique feature of this property that applicant would prefer to not disturb. Total 0-75' hardcover exists at 6.5%. Planning Commission and applicant discussed the potential for 0-75' hardcover removals at the May meeting. 75-250' Hardcover . Proposed hardcover in the 75-250' zone has been significantly reduced from the existing level of 6,180 s.f or 37.1 % to 4,630 s.f or 27.8 %. (28.2% if the bluff setback is not allowed, as deck will then not be reduced). The applicant included in his initial letter of request a number of factors which he believes are hardships that support the variance request. These factors included the ability to park numerous vehicles off of Highwood Road which is very narrow and has only minimal ability for on-street parking. The revised site plan still accomplishes these goals at a much reduced level of hardcover. Staff believes the new plan is very reasonable given the stated hardships and the fact that the existing garage will remain on the site. REVISED SITE PLAN ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Lot AreaAVidtIi: LR-IB Lot Area Lot Width Required 43,560 s.f (1 acre)140' Actual 28,648 s.f (0.66 acre)150'-157' f i I n \am—f -^iifUTTirri^Rinl Aii d #03-2901 4l2SHIgbwoodRMd July 17.2003 Page 3 Structural Coverage; Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 28.648 s.f.Allowed: 4,342 s.f. (15%) Proposed: 2,370 s.f. ± (8.3%) Hardcover Calculations; Disteace from Total area in Allowed Existing Proposed shoreline setback hardcover hardcover hardcover 0-75'11,993 s.f.0 s.f.779 s.f.779 s.f (0%)(6.5 %)(6.5 %) 75-250'16,655 s.f.4,164 s.f.6,180* s.f.4,630 s.f. (25 %)(37.1 %)*(27.8%)** * After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds **4,690 s.f. or 28.2% if 4* bluff encroachment is denied iMUeo for Consideration I.Applicant has provided a plan that addresses the Planning Commission recommendation to remove as much hardcover as possible to get closer to the 25% standard. Is the proposed plan acceptable to the Planning Commission? Do the stated hardships support the granting of the decreased hardcover variance as now proposed? 2.What hardship supports the granting of a variance to encroach 4' into the requit 30* bluff setback? Does the resultant slight decrease in deck hardcover offset any visual impacts caused by encroachment toward the bluff? 3.If the hardcover variance is approved, will Planning Commission be able to distinguish the unique aspects of this application from similar requests for rebuilds on similar sized lots? Does the mature landscaping of the site and the retention of the existing garage support the idea that this is not a ‘complete* site rebuild as compared to other situations where a site is completely redeveloped? 4.Does Planning Commission have any concerns regarding replacement of the deck in kind or in any marmer that encroaches within 30' of the top of the bluff, if applicant chooses to replace the deck in kind? i03-mi 4125 HighwMd Road Jalyl7,2M5 Paged Staff Recommcndatioa Note that Planning Commission has already taken action on the lot width variance and Uic 'accessory structure w/o principal structure during construction ’ variances. The revised house location need to be reconsidered in terms of its encroachment on the average lakeshore setback and bluff setback. Staff makes the following recommendations: 1. 2. 3. 4. Approval of the average setback variance for the revised location, finding no impacts to lake views enjoyed by neighboring property owners. Approval of the revised hardcover plan for 28% hardcover in the 75-250* zone, if Planning Commission can make a hardship distinction between this proposal and other to .1 rebuilds that have been held to the 25% limit. Approve proposal to make no changes to 0-75' zone hardcover. Approval of the 4' encroachment of the house into the 30* bluff setback. Note that only a small protrusion of the house will encroach the bluff setback. Planning Commission should advise applicant whether replacement of the deck in kind within the bluff setback would be look^ upon favorably. ■MMikili i v: ■ • >7'\' ■•-■ y ■ Qgfl 0 1 ROA!^'. o> N 84*46*00' 106.8 Pi r V^lh, y n» • — * i^tf ?^rSg^..: • I WATER S5 ai 0( OCX \ RCTAINING \. mu X'-'X" ON REJAININO WA ’^^^^OPERJY COf^NEf 9.0 1 K ICTAINING WALL 0.7-- 'f I- K- • Ig sgr-/. •“ S'.- §v ^ r"^ /^o?'y CXI51INC garage : lower floor /. ELEV.=957.J9 ^ /Yz/////'////// rXISTING HOUSE MAIN FLOOR CLEV.=965.59 i 968.5 j yti/uN noQf^oEVAmN « / /.ONCSr /1£lfV! 7 riMtxa/rj^a7.3oASPMrNr / I / FLOOR aJiLd-/, ,oa' /FLOOW n CV =9f>/ 29 / / 13/46 'O / o A02j / mtTji, 0: / 49.95-1:'---j"i'" y' \ *x®I'Ao>o /r ------EXTEND RET>UN/ EXISUNG DECK 1 CONCRETE-' Oa- O'! ~^960--^ EXISTING DECK 0z- •^'rofo y ^ 'Iti o ^ ,--LANDSC ^ -956 J TIMBERS \ •954^. I \ \ /■ WATER 'SPIGOT- X 953 8 hroposed STEPS . BOT 956.5/oo / EXISTING DECK 9// --------h'Tr-H-PWPOSED RETA, / / \ •JJ ^ \ CHA/N LINK fTNCE^' 26.0 IsHEoj ^j\ ^ 1 ^93^ \> iH^O / , ,/y^x 24 i\< 42- . —BLOCK RETAINING WALL V pi>T / \ / ■'CONCRETE RET.AINIt^ , WALLS .93*pV^ itP^' /a* a V i. y' BIOCK ' RCIAINING r/V^ J- n\ '-oc ON RETAININO WA P£RTY » U2 J Sgg CL I ---1-^V- I ■ ^ 05 :oro -iV------EXTEND REJAINI EXISIING DECK jpp_m4 BOT 956.5 --W'PROPOSED RETA J \j --BLOCK RETAINING WALL I i4>r. -V Z'*'^;pje6r-?T4 0.7-- f j I .O -31.37^------- m.OCK |T I ■JAININC. WALL |2 y "i I K • 1/1 «£> ^ SB >V.5 °S*o/ ki Q: • O22 I i rxisriNG / <<3 JT m 1 13/46 K ^ j. / EXISTING GARAGE d;n yl Y lEV.=957. I9 ^ ul!3 > 9S3< yttAiM fioa (>a£VA1H)N - 969.9'f^i '/ LOWar nfOR ELEV. 7 ^7.5 basement / ’/. too.. ELEV. = 9b7.29 / MAIN FLOOR 'A]\ > ^ a£V.=965.59 dfl| I*:;©P>o \\y. -. 0'“' ■' CONCRETE-'o. '^960— EXISTING DECKULLK i I -----'''t? - . --------''^24’'^J _)■'' 'I‘f;l- X f” J:' .—LANDS ■956-i. TIMBERSirpc; ■954-4.-WAffR SPIGOT- % X 953 8 f^ROPOSEP STEPS . IQ/ ■‘-JPP.ms BOT 956.5 -fr-----EXTEND RET/NN/ EXISTING DECK EXISTING DECK --W-PROPOSED RETA <o\.. th \ - \l\‘ ISMfO VfcO A- 26.0 1?' CHA/N LINK TENCE^-' {LEANING) \ --BLOCK RETAINING WALL ^5 X* \ \ pv/3 ; ■% ' 942- 20"^ ,^—XdNCRETE') RETAINING __ MAN tiOL-C^ :v4u> re .-r "I 1 rt>t N / V \ ftiL I ' j<r~ V--V ... V*‘ GU't' .;.* •• -- O'PLAT ; i!-A’f ':»■ .,r •V;f :lv.i AM /// !i<5^ ■.V.^JiTj- ;^^vSN>vdi i ^5.^PLAT -I-*- II 1 I' l|/'‘^-5-■•■;.hmr 2. I ■'•■■: PJOTT;V •• \*>s ..• ».• / RJLOCK / STAINING WALL [2 / |/////25 2'/7///‘ BLOCK \ RETAINING > ^ HWLL t V.-X* ON RETAINING WA " ' -------,P£PJY coiy<£^ ii9.0\ ' K‘. >•? ■:( ■>,•■■ .;••• ••’.‘5;/. V 5l . r~~I? »'. • 11.V 0.7«^ VT7///7 \ * #, > . "vty ■iji bs UJ 0: • ^^2 tt r.7:k V «• ♦. I O) NO) ^ N. V t''" y *yi«----tn ^0//////Ac^ .1 .> lower floor / ^ f.LEV.=957.19 ^ / 7 EXISTING GARAGE EXISTINGTTijOTf bL \ 6^'4^main floor e K-wY so Sfxl 4s«xw rioa^asvATtm - sM.3*q]l-<’ / 'j'/ LOIACST FV^ ElEV.- 'jON \a O. house 13/46 i Yy C-----9^ icSw OZ-J 0<5» alti >^o \ i.-EXTEND ROAINI K EXISTING DECK / J/ fWAU^OtlTj^^S/.a BASEW^NT EI.EV.-957.29 / Cf -♦/ J*; f: 16- ^o»- ■ O'O- im> CONCRETE— WALL ^ I k) u> ^ 9S0-0 I* y’,'-PRpTOSED / ft .1's> STEPS^^ 19^ B0f~956.S L-- ■960- EXISTING ; DECK -958 EXISTING DECK / y § ,—LANDSCAPr -956J- TIMBERS SONCRETE T^aJniI V. 22 PROPOSED RETAtI p CJ Jj ■954 — 7 \y -WMER 'SPIGOT- K V r >< 1 ^ ___ ^ 7 i. \i■942-' ^ y T}. V BLOCK RETAINING WALL \ CHAIN UNK TENCE^' \ ^(LEANING) __ 0^4^^ V |\‘ IsHCOI \l\ J 1 9’ \ .9^^' y'r<!;r50'3 -CONCRETE- RETAINI^ l^WAktS ^'-MA0OLi x: -A I V .7 its f / \ £ 5 h to P < ! 77) o: •')') I?8 > 7^ EXISTING DECK 2^4^ SHED, • • • ^ jIIs'-'V \ . BLOCK '' RETAINING WALL , X V--X* ON RETAINING WA V: u:z-j If ER7Y COf^Ef \ EXTEND RETAINI EXISTING DECK 90T 956.5 on -PROPOSED RETA. '—BLOCK retaining WALL r. / !•»<» ^ V ^ i'‘'•'o'; ••'"'.v-.I !••• / IlSite' *1 v.^• . . *1. . V'T-^:I • / * * . 7?x '-.-X- ON RETAINING WA // X ------------------- —. f ■•••■>’,i'-| Vv‘ • 'ik-r' ‘. ■ y ^^^^77777, § k ^ .'S' I ^ W vV . existing ''^'''' yr ^ ELEV.-965.59 ^ ^/^UAIN n.00 ^elevation - 965.3Tq"j! 7 y towcsr ofv. • jjoU ^/ (WAUfOUTJr?S7.S basement Ex;sriNC \ /ni, > oC? 'v Ill ------EXTEND RETAIN/ EXISTING DECK m . / Ur •:>—/. I ^ CONCRETE-'* O. y (’iwtjfa/r>937.3 basement .. */ l> FLOOR > ^ i-«-n r< EI.EV.-957.29 / 16" ^ •960-, /----1 EXISTING EXISTING I DECK -95a ' * ^--LANDS^Pfr >—CONCRETE fUihjNI -956-a . timbers •95^^-WATER 'SPICOT- - PROPOSED RETA, [>x -^950^--- _iO^.\Sr ^ N. 2^4^\K '<y'^ o 22.' \ OWN UNK TENCE^' \ y(CEANING) ■ -V . '— ■ ''9^-nfA .-^iiED SMEO V / I I \ ,\ \ \ ) * '—block RETAINING WALL mm. , <pe« A ' ’ ,1\0.* Q?* * (\P^ EXISTING! PWO»»08E r.A-3 HARDCOVER CACULATION WORKSHEET DRIVEWAY EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A isja X 10 X 1 m 103 S.F.* B &9S X 10 X 0.0 ■00 S.F.\ \C 2A X 38 X ILO m 100 8.F. D 3fi X HA X 1 m 1709 8.F.j E ifiJ3 X 20 X 0.0 ■100 8.F.1< F 3fi X iis X 1 s 02Z 8.F.h 0 10.17 X 15.25 X 1 a 100 8.F.1 H 10.17 X 2110 X 0.0 a in 3346 8.F. 8.F. 1 1 » HARDCOVER CACULATION WORKSHEET DRIVEWAY PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE I J 2fim X X Sfi X X 1 1 ■r # ' V A ^ -4 -.-“T’l :3 i‘.¥ ->kmSi? liSfi lAfi 1♦ »■I ! .A—■ f HARDCOVER CACULATION WORKSHEET Sidewalks EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE HARDCOVER CACULATION WORKSHEET Sidewalks PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE ! I A-<4 ■ A 2&X 12S X i 1 B 3S S.F. e 2i X 2^X i 1 *fifl S.F. c la X 1&X 1 s Ifi S.F. D ifl X fi X:1 ■fifi S.F. E 13.25 X 2SL X 'I 1 B S.F. F X fi 1 32 S.F. • 267 S.F. A fl X 123 X !1 m fi S.F. B 2fi X 2^X ‘1 K fifi S.F. C Q X IS X 1 B .7 S.F. 0 fl X fi X 1 8 fi S.F. E fl X 2^X 1 8 fl S.F. F fl X fi X 1 «fi S.F. O 2 X fi X 1 B Ifi H 3 X 1 X 1 B i2 M S.F. / ■ V Exislino House Garage 1219 750 Orivevray Sidewalk 3346 24 4.25 4 Deck landscape 28 31 16 46 2.5 2.67 8 1.3 15 7.25 3 3346 60 11.3475 32 36.4 465 \UAi^COI/s!l 116 138 JUL-14-Se03 09:46 FROM:763-479-2183 TO:+9522494616 P.002^002 liL. EidsUng HouM Garage 1219 790 DrtvovMqf Sidewalk Deck Other 3340 24 4^ 4 28 31 10 40 2 21 2.07 0 1^ 15 7^ 3 2 1 37J2% Propoead 3340 00 11.347S 32 30.4 405 110 138 4 21 0190 House 1035 Garage 790 Driveway 0 1030 CWOMaeAlk 24 2.5 00 4.2S 0 0 2 0 10 3 4 12 Deck zr IS 405 10 7.25 110 tandseape 40 0 0 Ottier 2 0 0 21 0 0 27.80% 0 I ii / MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 19,2003 6:00 o’clock p.m. B (#6 #03-2890 MEADWOOD, INC. ON BEHALF OF MARK CREE, Continued) Mabusth stated that the City needs to involve many more levels in order to begin discussions and make recommendations for a new product such as this system. Gaffron maintained that what exists currently on the site is 32% hardcover versus the original approvals for approximately 27% hardcover several years ago. He believed the applicants would need to answer many questions before the City would consider their new application. Rahn stated that the original approvals allowed 25% hardcover; whereas, many things have continued to be built since that time. He pointed out that there were far too many issues with the application other than just the permeability issue Mr. Swanson wished to discuss. There were no public comments. If staff expresses an interest. Chair Smith indicated that time needs to be spent in a work study to analyze the potential of the product. Gaffron suggested the Commission leave the hardcover issue with the applicants and staff to pursue, and indicated that it would take some effort to understand how and where the permeable paver system has been used successfully. Given the condition of staff, Gaffrcn acknowledged that an evaluation of the product would not even be on any radar screen for priorities. While he believed the City should consider the merits of products like this, Gaffron cautioned the Commission from labeling it non-hardcover due to the precedent this would set. While Gaffron indicated that he would be happy to work with' 'r. Swanson over the long term, tlie application would likely be tabled this evening due to the concerns inherent in the application. Hawn moved, Zugschwert seconded, recommending Application #03-2890, Meadowood, Inc., Mark and Nancy Cree, 3120 North Shore Drive, a request for a hardcover variance in the 75*-2S0’ zone be tabled for more information, and that the presence of the applicant or their representative is requested for further consideration. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. (#7) #03-2893 JOHN AND ROBERTA HENRICH, 4125 HIGHWOOD ROAD, VARIANCES, 10:35 - 11:17 P.M. John and Roberta Henrich, the applicants, were present. Gaffron explained that the applicants proposed to remove the existing house and construct a new house on the property. The lot is located in the LR-IB zoning district requiring a PAGE 23 of 39 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 19,2003 6:00 o ’clock p.in. (#7 ^03-2893 JOHN AND ROBERTA HENRICH, Continued) minimum lot size of one acre and a lot width of 140’ measured at the lakeshore and at the 75' setback. They were requesting variances to permit new construction on an undersized lot (0.66 acre) having a conforming lot width of 150’-157’. An average lakeshore setback variance is requested for an encroachment of approximately 8’ by the proposed house. The existing detached garage will remain, requiring a variance to allow an accessory structure without a principal structure during the construction period. Also requested is a hardcover variance for the 75-250’ zone to allow 37.71% where only 25% is normally allowed. Gaffron noted that the site plan centers the new house within the 75-250’ zone meeting all required lot line setbacks but encroaching slightly past the average setback. The new house would encroach only 2-3’ further past the average setback line than the existing house, and would have insignificant impact on neighboring views of the lake. The house location approximately 107* from the lakeshore meets the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for new structures. Gaffron continued that the existing detached garage is less than 20 years old and is in good condition. It contains a storage area below which fits well with the topography of the site. Once again, Gaffron stated that the primary concern is the harucover variance request. The Plaiuiing Commission and Council have been fairly consistent in denying hardcover variances for new construction unless a distinct hardship can be demonstrated. He pointed out that structural coverage is proposed at approximately 2370 s.f. or 8.3 %, well within the 15 % limitation. With regard to bluff impacts, Gaffron reported that if the existing deck remains in place, it has a legal nonconforming status in regard to the bluff setback, as it was constructed in 1990, prior to the 1992 adoption of bluff ordinances as part of the Shoreland ordinance. If it is replaced, it will require a variance to the required 30’ top-of-bluff setback requirement for structures. Gaffron explained that the proposed hardcover in the 75-250’ zone is 6,280 s.f or 37.71 %. The applicant has included in his letter of request a number of factors which he believes are hardships that support the variance request. These factors include the ability to park numerous vehicles off of Highwood Road which is very narrow and has only minimal ability for on-strect parking. A hardcover variance was granted for the site in 1990 resulting in a reduction from 43.6% to 43.0% in the 75-250’ zone. Whereas the house footprint is increasing in size from about 1240 s.f to 1600 s.f and the new house is not excessive for the lot, the ancillary hardcover is the primary issue for discussion. Gaffron maintained that it is staff s opinion that a site plan could be developed that would accommodp'.e the proposed new home on this property without the need for a hardco\'er variance. However, that would require substantial changes to the character of the lot, and would potentially result in less off-street parking availability. PAGE 24 of 39 / MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 19,2003 6:00 o’clock p.m. (#7 <103-2893 JOHN AND ROBERTA HENRICH, Continued) Gaffron relayed staff recommendations, as follows: • Approval of the variances for lot area based on the fact the lot is developed as a single family dwelling, has been provided sanitary sewer service and it would not be possible to acquire additional land to create a conforming lot. • Approval of the average setback and accessory structure variances as described above. Determine whether the deck will remain in place or whether a variance to top-of-bluff setback would be allowed for its replacement. • It would be most consistent with City actions over the past 3-4 years to deny the variance for exceeding 25% hardcover in the 75-250' zone for new construction. In order to approve the request. Planning Commission must make findings about the unique aspects of this property that rise to the level of a hardship to the property. Mr. Henrich pointed out that their structure was quite modest at merely 8% coverage and that they had built the garage in its current location in an effort to maintain the unique landscaping aspects of the property, including the grove of lilacs. He maintained that the access was designed in its current configuration based on City recommendations and numerous discussions. He stated that one of their hardships was exiting the driveway safely in the winter due to the grades. In addition, he noted that it would take a pretty significant amount of reworking and a great deal of money to make enormous changes to the lot and its character to accommodate the requirements. Gaffron concurred that it would take a great deal of substantial changes to make the property conform, which in turn would change tlie entire character of the property. While they looked into remodeling, Henrich acknowledged that the home was 80 years old and in ne^ of total repair. They had decided to rebuild ai J felt their hardships justified their application. Although cost was not an acceptable hardship alone, Hawn agreed that the property was steep and that it would be very expensive to change it. Mrs. Henrich stated that they had made attempts to rework the garage in the design phase only to be confronted with new drainage issues. Henrich stated that he would be hesitant to remove, or lose, his relatively new and sen'iceable garage in order to construct his home. He was given a variance and built the garage in 1990 and felt removing the garage would have little impact on the placement of the house. PAGE 25 of 39 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 19,2003 6:00 o’clock p.m. (#7 #03-2893 JOHN AND ROBERTA HENRICH, Continued) Rahn stated that the Conunission would ask the applicant to remove the old shed in the 0- 75 ’ setback and replace it with a lockbox. Henrich stated that he believed the steep grade provided them with adequate hardship to also keep the shed. Hawn concurred with Rahn regarding the shed. While Gafiron stated that, if money was not an issue, someone could change the grade, the access, and the entire character of the property to mi^e the design conforming, he questioned whether that should be the goal of the Conunission. He added that parking is an issue for residents along Highwood and the added space they have serves a use to the neighboriiood. Chair Smith questioned whether the necessary changes to make it conforming would require exorbitant amounts of fill. Galiron indicated that it would require a lot of All to change the property, which, in turn, could create drainage issues. Bremer questioned how cutting the size of the home down to meet requirements would work. At merely 1600 s.f., Henrich maintained that cutting the house down an extra 100-200 s.f. would not impact hardcover significantly, but would impact their livability. While he did not feel the size of the home to be an issue, Rahn felt that other removals were warranted. He su^ested that they remove the shed, design a smaller deck, and remove some of the driveway hardcover. He agreed that tht topography of the property presented a hardship. While she concurred, Bremer stated that they would need to be clear that it was the steep elevations that presented the hardship, unlike the Toth’s whose project warranted a basic redesign. Rahn stated that, short of regrading the entire topography of the site, they could not redesign the application. Hawn encouraged the applicants to find additional hardcover removals. PAGE 26 of 39 .1 . I 'I i / MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 19,2003 6:00 o’clock p.m. (#7 #03-2893 JOHN AND ROBERTA HENRICH, Continued) Chair Smith indicated that she felt there was significant hardship to support the variance request and would be comfortable allowing the applicant to work with staff to find additional removals to get closer to 2S%. Bremer deferred to staff to work with the applicant to find additional removals, while maintaining safe access for the applicant. Henrich indicated that he would be happy to woric with staff to find some additional removals. Mabusth concurred, stati..g that, in her opinion, there were sufficient or definite hardships to the land to recommend approval of this application. Bremer moved, Zugschwert seconded, to recommend approval of Application #03- 2893, John and Roberta Henrich, 4125 Highwood Road, granting lot width, average lakeshore setback variances, and a variance to allow an accessory structure without a principal structure during construction on the propert}’; VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Bremer moved, Zugschwert seconded, to table the variance for hardcover in the 75 ’- 250* setback zone for the purpose of redesign. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#8) #03-2894 DOUGLAS AND ROBAN SMITH, 4195 HIGHWOOD ROAD, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE, 11:17-11:25 P.M. Mr. Smith, the applicant, was present. Mabusth explained that the applicant was requesting the following variances to permit replacement of existing retaining walls and stairs within 75 ’ of the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka: 1 . 524 s.f. (4.6%) hardcover within the 0-75’ setback zone where none is permitted; 2. grading, filling and excavating of more than 10 cubic yards within 75 ’ of the OHWL where no more than 10 cubic yards is permitted; and 3. placing fill in a bluff impact zone where no fill is permitted. Mabusth noted that the City Engineer had requested additional information with regard to; 1 . A detailed plan and profile design, including sections on either side of the stairway and profile showing how plantings will screen the hardcover from the lakeside; 2. Calculations of the necessary amount of excavation and fill for the project; and 3. A detailed erosion and sediment control plan. PAGE 27 of 39 CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 (952) 249-4600 ZONING FILE: #03-2893 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: May 28. 2003 TO;John & Roberta Henrich 4I2S Highwood Road Orono, MN 55364 COPIES: TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances DATE OF MEETING: May 19. 2003 Planning Commission recommended as follows: Motion 1: Approval of variances for lot width, average lakeshore setback and accessory structure w/o principal structure during construction. VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST Motion 2: Table the hardcover variance to allow applicant to redesign with the intent of reducing hardcover to result in a plan closer to the 25% standard. VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commissioners did indicate they felt that the site does present certain hardships which would support some degree of hardcover variance. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as; Planning Commission - Monday, June 16, 2003; meeting starts at 6:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. If you have questions, please call Planning Director Mike Gaffron at 612-249-4600. . I: ♦ ; t . < I i r ! 7 Application Received: 4/18/03 Application Complete: S/7/03 60 Day Deadline: 7/7/03 TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: Mike Gaffron, Planning Director^ May IS. 2003 SUBJECT:#03*2893 John & Roberta Henrich 4125 Highwood Road Variances — Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) 28,648 s.f. (0.66 acre) Application Summary: The applicants propose to remove the existing house and construct a new house on the property. The lot is located in the LR-IB zoning district requiring a minimum lot size of one acre and a lot width of 140' measured at the lakeshore and at the 75' setback. They are requesting variances to permit new construction on an undersized lot (0.66 acre) having a conforming lot width of 150'-157*. An average lakeshore setback variance is requested for an encroachment of approximately 8' by the proposed house. The existing detached garage will remain, requiring a variance to allow an accessory structiu'e without a principal structure during the construction period. Also requested is a hardcover variance for the 75-250* zone to allow 37.71% where only 25% is normally allowed. \ Lbt of Exhibits A Application Letter of Request, Neighbor Comments Survey/Propjsed Site Plan jr /> Hardcover Calculation Worksheets [ Hardcover Map Elevation Views/Floor Plans Plat Map Property Owners List Site Photos Resolution No 2858 (1990 hardcover variance) B C D E F G H I J VC Pertinent Code Sections 1. Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B): Required lot area: 1.0 acre Lot area: 0.54 acre L,. L.„. #03«2901 4 12S Htghwood Road May 15.2003 Page 2 2.Section 10.22 Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(L): Hardcover limitations: Allowed Existing Proposed 0-75 ’ 0% 6.5 %* 6.5% 75-250 ’ 25% 37.1%* 37.71% • After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds 3.Section 10.56 Subdivision 16(C)(6), variance to permit an 8' encroachment of the average lakeshore setback 4. Section 10.03, Subd. 9(A), variance to allow an accessory structure (existing detached garage) without a principal structure during the construction period. Existing Conditions The lot currently contains an existing residence structure which the owner wishes to replace, and a detached garage which is proposed to remain. Pluff lippact The site has steep slopes, and although a formal bluff analysis has not been completed, the easterly 2/3 of the 0-75* zone appears to meet the criteria for a bluff, having an average slope of32-34% from the shoreline to the 956'-958' contour, above which the slope reduces to no more than 18%. Both the existing house and proposed house are outside of the bluff impact zone as defined by the 956-958’ contours moving east to west, and just meet the top-of-bluff30' setback requirement. However, the existing deck which is proposed to either remain in place or be reconstructed, is within 1-2 ’ of the top of bluff at its southeast comer. Existing, Q-75 —Zone /^^enitie$. Existing retaining walls, concrete or flagstone walkways and stairways in the 0-75 ’ zone are in good condition and no changes are proposed. The 0-75 ’ zone also contains m 8'xl2’ shed and an area of landscape timbers surrounding planting beds near the shore. The existing 0-75 ’ landscaping has been developed for many years and is a unique feature of this property that applicant would prefer to not disturb. There also is a stone lined pond area east of the house in the 0-75 ’ zone which is underlaid with landscape fabric. This area is not proposed to be changed but the fabric liner must be removed according to City requirements (Resolution No. 4006). Dri vg^yay$ ^nd Site Acpe$s. Another unique characteristic of the property is the driveway access, which is a circuitous route from Highwood Road to the detached garage, and includes a large paved area for parking and maneuvering, plus retaining walls that accomplish the necessary grade change. While this area could likely be totally reworked to result in a more efficient access and reduced hardcover, applicant again notes that this would change the entire character of the property. Minor revisions to the paved areas are proposed in an attempt to reduce hardcover in the 75-250 ’ zone. # kft. ff03-2901 4l25HighwoodRoa<l May 15,2003 Page 3 General Conformity to Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan The site plan centers the new house within the 75*250' zone, meeting all required lot line setbacks but encroaching slightly past the average setback. The new house will encroach only 2-3 ’ further past the average setback line than the existing house, and will have insignificant impact on neighboring views of the lake. The house location approximately 107' from the lakeshore meets the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for new structures. The existing detached garage is less than 20 years old and is in good condition. It contains a storage area below which fits well with the topography of the site. The primary concern is the hardcover variance request. The Planning Commission and Council have been fairly consistent in denying hardcover variances for new construction unless a distinct hardship can be demonstrated. Structural coverage (excluding decks which are currenily not above 6') is proposed at approximately 2370 s.f. or 8.3 %, well within the 15 % limitation. Lot Area This record lot consists of 3 combined platted lots. The lots were originally platted prior to current zoning standards, and developed lots in the neighborhood typically consist of 1 lot, in a few cases 2 or 3 lots combined. This is one of the larger properties in the neighborhood. The site has contained a single family home for many years. The substandard lot area is inherent to the property. No adjoining land is available to make the lot larger. While the substandard lot area somewhat limits the re-use of the property for construction of a replacement home, a replacement home could be constructed that meets all other zoning code standards, hence the area variance should be granted. Average Setback The proposed replacement home is in approximately the same location as the existing house, with a very minor additional average setback encroachment of 3-4' past the existing house. This will have virtually no impact on neighboring views of the lake due to the orientation of the adjoining house to the west and the topography. The average setback variance should be granted. Accessory Structure Without Principal Structure Dunng the period between demolition of the existing home and completion of the new home, the detached garage will technically have the status of an accessor^ structvje without a principal structure, not in compliance with Section 10.03, Subd. 9(A). This variance should be granted, subject to removal of the detached garage i f z principal structure is not commenced in a timely manner after demolition of the existing house. I 1 4 f #0.U290I 412S Hlsbwood Road May 15.2003 Paged Bluff Impacts If the existing deck remains in place, it has a legal nonconforming status in regard to the bluff setback, as it was constructed in 1990, prior to the 1992 adoption of bluff ordinances as part of the Shoreland ordinance. If it is replaced, it will rennln> » van’an/'A tn om •_replaced, it will require a variance to the required 30‘ top-of-bluff setback requirement for structures. Hardcover Variance Propos^ hardcover in the 75-250* zone is 6.280 s.f. or 37.71 %. The applicant has included in his letter of request a number of factors which he believes are hardships that support the variance request. These factors include the ability to park numerous vehicles off of Highwood Road which IS very narrow and has only minimal ability for on-street parking. A hardcover variance was granted for the Site in 1990 resulting in a reduction from 43.6% to 43.0% in the 75-250* zone (Sec Exhibit The house footprint is increasing in size from about 1240 s.f. to 1600 s.f. While the new house is not excessive for the lot, the ancillary hardcover is the primary issue for discussion. It is staffs opinion that a site plan could be developed that would accommodate the proposed new home on this property without the need for a hardcover variance. However, that would require substantial changes to the character of the lot. and would potentially result in less off-street parking availability. Are these factors sufficient to act as a hardship? Issues for Consideration 1.Applicant has indicated that most areas of hardcover on the property are necessary either for vehicular movement, parking, or to deal with topographic features such as the retaining walls and 'valkways. It might be argued that the access to the site is inefficient in terms of hardcover usage and should be totally revamped as part cf the home replacement project. Applicant should be asked to define areas he may be able to remove hardcover to result in a rebuild that more closely meets the 25% limit... 2.Are the factors described by the applicant in support of his hardcover request sufficient to justify granting of the variance requested? 3.If the hardcover variance is approved, will Planning Commission be able to distinguish the unique aspects of this application from similar requests for rebuilds on similar sized lots? 4.Does Planning Commission have any concerns regarding the lot area nr average setback variances, or replacement of the deck in kind or in pny manner that ent ches within 30* of the top of the bluff? • «03-2Ml 412SHIghwMdRMd May 15,2003 Pages Staff R( Stafif makes the following recommendations: • Appro'* i of the variances for lot area based on the fact the lot is developed as a single family dwelling, has been provided sanitary sewer service and it would not be possible to acquire addition^ land to create a coiifonning lot. • Approval of the average setback and accessory structure variances as described above. Determine whether the deck will remain in place or whether a variance to top-of-bluff setback would be allowed for its replacement. • It would be most consistent with City actions over the past 3-4 years to deny the variance for exceeding 25% hardcover in the 75-250' zone for new construction. In order to approve the request. Planning Com'nission must make Andings about the unique aspects of this property that rise to the level of a hardship to the property. Options for Action ! 1. Recommend approval or partial qrproval, with conditions. 2. Recommend denial, stating reasons. 3. Table for revision of further discussion, providing applicant with specific direction if possible. 4. Other action.. > 1 Lot AreaAVidth ; Structural Coverage : ANALYSIS WORKSHEET LR-IB Lot Area Lot Width Required 43,560 s.f. (1 acre)140' Actual 28,648 s.f. (0.66 acre)150 ’-157' Hardcover Calculationt! After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 28,648 s.f Allowed: 4,342 s.f (15%) Proposed: 2,370 s.f ± (8.3%) Distance from shoreline Total area in setback Allowed hardcover Existing hardcover Proposed hardcover 0-75'11,993 s.f 0s.f (0%) 779 s.f (6.5 %) 779 s.f (6.5 %) 75-250'16,655 s.f 4,164 s.f (25 %) 6,180* s.f (37.1 %)* 6,280 s.f (37.7 %) /) cm' OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee S2SO.OO (S50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee SI50.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures S250.00 Afrer-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) Application # O'h Date Received " Amount Paid PROPER'f Y INFORMATION Site Address ft (K d Property Identification Number^J.d7)^ 7II 7,oy ny k ttach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Dfctc P^er|y Acquire d OH - / II - Q- 3 ~ ^j f / ^ (J r (do) also own the adjacent parcels of land. ' PresenttlSeof property: X residential other (specify)i Xmonth/year) Zoning District:, APPLICANT ^.Chy4ex. WcwrTcK (home) Name_tt/ tr ________ Phone (work) 7^3 - / Address: V/2S City: ^/IOaJO Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) Phone (work)_ Address;City:,Zip:, DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $' Oi> Describe request in detail: 'Tf ^^cJf t\ ^ i, /^ Ua ^ (attach additional sheets if necessary) CES REQUIRED Lot Area ___Lot Width Hardcover Setback:__Front ___Side ___Rear Average Lakeshore 1 Lot Coverage )( Other (specify) AcCfi<,^OAy <^-yduCfoMp HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardslup or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:____________________________________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) ./) y I t. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 0 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Completed Application Form Zy1^\'T‘Z. Sk.«h« .r p.™ of floor 4 Covaflon (O cW^n List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an inwi-ef * *u property TWs would incM. .»o(s) of .ppli4)Krc™„ “ Additional items as may be requested by City staff. » APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested bv th#» 7n • supplied is z «.d ^ rirof Applicant's Signature ^7/^/0 ? OWTVIER'S SIGNATURE cm” fh?X“cit; “affTomuUaSi' ““ members for pufl,oses of investigation'and verifiJato onhu “” ““ Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 davs before the Pi,nn- • • Meeting. Planning Corn.nission Meetings ie helH In T i Commission Applicants must be present at all scheduled review mectines of the PI month. Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled iI^!L?!a^ i*^ "S Commission and have an authorised agent attend in your place and ^v^tSld “ change prior to the meeting. ® Zomng Office of this // s'cr-x..^ V....../ •: ...•• ‘>4,io7 . >E April 18.2003 City of Orono Planning Commission P.O. Box 66 Orono. MN SS323 R£: Variance Request 4I2S Highwood Rd To Whom It May Concern: I moved into Orono when 1 was 18 months old. My parents bought a house at 4125 Highwood Rd. 1 grew up in that house. In 1989 my wife Bobbi and I bought the house from my parents. This property has been in our family for almost 50 years. The house on the property is at least 82 years old. When built there were no building codes and I am not sure the person/persons who built it knew what a level or tape measure was. The house is slowly falling down and we wish to build a new house on the lot. We have considered remodeling the house, but that is not a viable option. However to build a suitable house on this lot will require four variances. The first variance request is for hard cover. The way our garage sits (close to the road and cut into a hill) we are not able to drive directly onto Highwood. We must first drive to the west make a sharp turn then drive out northeast. When I park in the garage it is easiest for me to back in and I must serpentine back up to get into the garage This is why we need such a large driving area. Highwood is a very narrow road and there is no room for on road parking, our driveway can accommodate ten cars. This keeps vehicles off the road and allows traffic to be able to move through safely. Many times in the past we have allowed our neighbors to park there >vhen they are having people visit. Removal of any of the drive area would create a considerable hardship. When we built the garage in 1990 we were granted a hard cover variance. Our next varia ce request is for average setback. Our two neighbors houses to the west are farther south than ours is; however the house to the east is quite a bit further back. I feel the main reason for this is because we are on the tip of a point into the lake and they are on the receding side. Our house faces due south and the house to the east faces more southeast. I have discussed our building plans with the neighbors and they agree that our new house will not affect their view of the lake. I am including a letter from they stating that they have no objection to our building plans. We have a very good relationship with all of our neighbors and their opinion on our building plans is very important to us. The third variance request is that we will be tearing down the primary residence but wish to leave the garage. The garage is a little over 10 years old and in excellent shape. # f : •. . t i* i ' - i i I L The fourth variance is for a lot area variance. There were three lots combined into one in 1990 and there is no land available in the area for purchase. We have a couple of issues with our lot, which may need to addressed. First when my parents moved into the houM there was a boat house about 25 feet from the lake. This structure is still there. I am including photos to verify this. The second issue is that there are two existing retaining walls within the 0-75 foot setback area. Our house is approximately 65 feet above the lake. The angle of the hill is about 45 degrees. If these walls were not in place there would be long-term consequences for the structure if they were not in place. When we moved into the house we built a useable garage and by working with the City of Orono and the building inspectors we were able to build a structure, which we are proud of today. We are expectit^ to be able to have the same relationship through out this project. Respectfully Submitted Bobbi and Jack Henrich M Ch O . Tfr n yf Vi;Bm ••...t.i-81 \ i Joanne & George Applebaum 4109 Highwood Road B-l Orono, Minnesota 55364 (952) 472-1270 Gapple @ aol.com March 17,2003 Bobbi & Jack Henrich 4125 Highwood Road Orono, MN 5S364 Dear Bobbi & Jack, At your request, and at the recommendation of the city, we are writing this letter to express our thoughts to your reouest for a variance to the city’s average lakeshore setback ordinance. First, we want you to know mat we are excited about your upcoming project and thrilled at the prospect of having you as neighbors indefinitely! Now back to the issue at hand. We strongly support the issuance of the variance, as we cannot imagine a situation in which the positioning of your new home <mi your lot would in any way have a negative impact with our enjoyment of our fabulous lake views. From what you have described, 1 don’t believe that we would even see your new house from ours. If we can be of further assistance, please contact us. Warmest regards, Joanne & Geoige Applebaum jx o Qittjt. r-' ■6 ”'^-^ 4i i Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement Form I (wc) /VAt'/cy KodH___________of [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at ___________________also refened to as Land Use Applic::.tion No.________ I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Date Property Owner /;l '^3 Date «*4i*iti*«i»4i4i*i|i«4i****4>********4>*****ft**********************************4i*4i4>**«*** I (w e) [print n«.Tie(s)][print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at __________________ also referred to as Land Use Application No.________. I (wc) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware ot the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owmer Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. I i- 4 < •• »■ m' mHS mli K > L i ■ f ^' ’ i‘. IBi (91PiMt; eU rj.—•■., • • *. i •'ifr V-' m mI?!?. Vv<2 ' s ti^ i <ii m t %< - Ml.' f in' ’ ■ ■ r */'''••*•' • »;• r: 1 • V * #ta &r-.v- ■> tA^r.iia'^. - ,..aJilk t • • tmm mm • mm mm ■ pi' 1:^4 ■■%J >• C ■' ■' ^3BL^ vH' iiriilfiiinHiirtHii' i j /'H * .. • \ • i *! i \ ________ ^2>4A4» _J^ —^ .^^if *””'~^ dUjfPyf^ jW8 ® ^ -«W- ^ e^J^£ .. /l^r ~ i ij N iUS» • « t••• A• .uoo r^Q,It^O ¥r,:^ in. r ^ * .s ’. A'r. . \ . V V. t-J . \ • rrC^. .*• •• ' ■'> ^ ^ Jl m-.^ssasr-ill - -Y i - 'V " 4»^mi- m ••• • •. ilMyi^ »<n,r.7-• • • \- f'- \l! V*. t •C ^' ,rt r< fr 1 • • • * I*r r...»r i- <•r vl f, .'c'<V. . « •Ia.Xi « i' { • li '» •! HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET b A A TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZON*E ^ / g - B X 100 B X 100 PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House 3^ Length 'width X X X B. Garage C. Driveway 3 <2? X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck 'i/ Ut. X X / r m m F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PBOKRTY AREA IN ZONE * B X 100 • SETBACK ZONE:(CIRCLE ONE)0-75’75-250'250-500 ’500-1000 ’ EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House H X '16 ai SP. Length Width X -SJ. X •SJ. X S.F. B. Gange 15 X 'bo m "7 S O SJ. C. Driveway X fiiifirjfPP m SJ. X m SJ. D. Sidewalk X m SJ. X S.F. E. Patio/Deck 3/X K m SJ. \L X m U k SJ. F. Landscape X 3 m ! i 'S’SI* Underlain X m SJ. By Plastic X m S.F. G. Other X 1 m SJ. 'lOH 11^ A */« S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. yso S.F. 3 O 9A S.F. S.F. SJ. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SF. S.F. S.F. SF. . S.F. SJ. A S.F. B A B HARDCOVER CACULATION WORKSHEET DRIVEWAY EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE HARDCOVER CACULATION WORKSHEET DRIVEWAY PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE L A X Ifi X 1 s S.F. B &fiS X Ifl X QA s 33 8.F. C 21 X 32 X QA B IfiS S.F. D X X 1 B 1233 8.F. E 1&33 X 22 X QA 8 m 8.F. F X ilS X 1 B m 8.F. O liLU X ISJIS X 1 S 133 8.F. H 1M7 X 21Z3 X QA =in 8.F. 3346 8.F. A 1 X 13 X 1 B 10 8.F. B 3^X 13 X 3^8 33 S.F. C 21 X 3fi X OJi 8 133 S.F. D 3L3 X 12^X 1 3 1338 8.F. E 13.33 X 23 X iL5 8 133 8.F. F 33 X 13^X 1 8 32Z 8.F. 6 10.17 X 15.25 X 1 8 133 8.F. H 10.17 X 2123 X 3.3 8 in S.F. 3095 S.F. HARDCOVER CACULATION WORKSHEET Sidewalks EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A 2fi X 12S X 1 s 25 S.F. B 2fi X 2^X 1 ^ s fifl S.F. C U X X 8 15 S.F. D Ifl X fi X 1 m fifl 8.F. E 13.25 X ISL X 1 8 S.F. F fi X fl 1 3 22 S.F. 267 8.F. HARDCOVER CACULATION WORKSHEET Sidewalks PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A B C D E F G H fl ±1 1 fi 1 2 1 X X X X X X X X 12S Z5. 2L5 fi 2^ fi fi 1 X X X X X X X X 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 s fl flfl Ifi iS 21 22 Ifi 12 204 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 8.F. 57^ 17 Q ld:>(! K}S-?S i,.'( ^ H'^SHV.'OOD R oa ^ <5^5k-5 / 6 ‘:fc POWER~^^ ■ ,-GUy WIRE I v»ov^ V- /7 f\ r »<r" -^plat {tils I 1 iif ^ *WATER pjfOr- /' or/^^ *4J /] 5 *? sip o I .§ * I ... e? S'v/ ,x ° ot<vj U j O: • t*j ^o 5//S^4p- o 4&. A. f«l I ay^frjy ^7777~26^77T^ 6 r~"ii < CUY^j^^ --". / 25TpuT^^ I -96.» /''BLOCK I ( REWNING WALL |S y 7/777:2^^77777' BLOCK ' RETAINING WALL \'-•x” ON RCTA/N/Nd MW XM^OPERTY 9.o\ I EXiailNC GARAGE W‘>""'"-rfih^ EXIt^ftN(J /A[/.>0 ------------ yi HOUSE ^ MAIN FLOOR j/ ^ ELEV.=965 59 ^ / LOWER FLOOR / < ELEV.-957.19 ^ / / ^/////////////. oM'-ci. MA/N FtOOR ^ ELEV.=965 5L ^ '^Um FlOa^OJEVAIION - 9tf&5'?, / EOMcir « ^ EITK- 7 (HMJ^OUT) 1^7.5 [iASEMFNT ^ - ELEV. = 9b/.29 / / -^49.95-1----|"?P" / ^ I— ^ QjUjiS O ^ ^'A' / » » CONCRETE-^ Jjjjr - \/‘’!w>BfrST/NC / DECK 'i I ----- ’#1 't -/1, / S "\s V/ ■’EXTEND RETAiNt .<EXISTING DECK ot !' osaa PROPOSED , ^ STEPS ^ 6» J BOT 956.5 y S --iandscap C ■~® -956 • UMOERS 20-T '( o<">, 00 PROPOSED RETA, ■954— -V —I '^950 ---- "«-i G '' 22.’ CHA/N UNK TENCr—' (LEANING) 26.0 SHED -5 'Y^ \/ / ./ V'v-^ ^ ''yA6^/\\^ i—BLOCK RETAINING WAIL qAA >'» yG.9A2 ^ ~^CT)NCRETE— RETAINING WALLS .-„ir / 'V •'.7 eC^P^ 0^9-’ ■?'. ^\v*0i(9^' • • •A’ v»ov-'- V/\ - BLOCK REfAININC 064 '|;u WALL |H / m ,9.0 ON REJAININ^ WA PER7Y CO/^Ef II,. iT I »»# o^ >J j n < ajui 2S ct .y;/i //'SI -tV------EXTEND RErAINI OPOSED , ^;teps „ ■'-.JOP 9^jj. ’’ 0OT 95«.5 -■M-PROPOSED RETA 0- /^r'0- —BLOCK RETAINING WAIL imr fs P: Uj /P ^a' I4J o 7 WATER SPJ tOr-' 0.7^^ £?/ Plat V I _^0LocK ® 1;^ I, RETMNING WALL |S / 13^6 m PERTY CORNEf \ik fv 77777725777777^ \ GARAGE o[V »o / /o lower floor / /. MAIN FLOOR <'/ ELEV.=965 59 ^ JiSf ytlAIN FLOat^El£VA1tON - 969.5^^ / EOMESr n ^ 0£K‘ 's '/ (miKOun WM7.5 basement P , I / FLOOR ^ 2lrt (t)IU^ /ct / \ I \ y ^i'-- / /J io-%( I ' CONCRETE -' 2 WALL (O' »6" TTir ^ o vreeofn OtCi. , Izb-95a. 2 -.iandscapC ~® -956 I I/MOERS \ •95^-, _\ .'-WATER SPIGOT— \ >- -- 7'SS ------EXTEND RETAIN/ 958 « -PROPOSED ,^ _ STEPS / I B: ! 3 ^' il BOT 956.5 _________-■\\-PROPOSED RETA -- 22; y CHAIN LINK TENCE--' “ ^(LEANING) \ 26 0 'SHED v-93®‘ -SH£0 X V., i-M !' 19* t \ I —; *1 — t V V,V:> c- f t: ••h | .•> «, yt ■i' ■ ;''V -J ; ■ ^ ■■■f ’ ,V^ • ^ v*w*»Mi >s >v; y'-. V. • •,•••• • '••• •• '•»*••-«••. .as^. .'rc^. - "N t '■ >1V,') -j i;}.).0 I :• •. ' V ■• • t. '•'./K !• 17' N I -f ’':' ■ ■ >■ \ ■ jt«>'-»'».-ki.’' ■•»* ,• ? ,r\' * V > 00 C.V ) to t i .V ‘ ‘ ---'-‘■r gNeic4l- rb^iveit- ru»ee ••• *4 • ♦ • • ‘ -•I'n £0 I Vw • ...... • *. ^ ■’ • *'iI ■• J i"r') <•.- :^-y ,:V 7 .. f ■ ' i • ••..1 " • p • • Hpnn<^ ^iiy^zig S'S ruk/A r^z&S^.jji/h’-:----r tfniH PiHSNSiat^ iitai "t?. ^rnm,- Ifc- ,-i :l»iMfeMt( •te. o IT J S • • M •>1 o • • ? 3 County Tax payer Seivices-g||^ ^ ‘‘••‘in: * fen,; V ;-«N tr>; OV- m- 2 .:*j;^arce/ Information * % i‘ • •Parcel ID 0711723440084 Housa Numbar 4128 Straat Nama HIOHWOOD RO 7hi$lsnot»l»gs»yneord»dmtp.Hnpf»s9ntt»comptttionetlnl6nmton‘' »nd data from aty. CourHy. and SM* road cutfKvWM«nc/o0MfapuriMS, .- < lilr, t-i M frtitiriiairtlll RUN DATE: 38 0711723440013 PROPAODR 4101 HIOHWOODRD OWNER NAME GARY LOERMUNDSEN TAXPAYER OARY LAWRENCE OERMUNDSEN NAME/ADDR 4101 HIGHWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 38 0711723440018 PROP ADOR 4149 HIGHWOOD RD OWNER NAME M P KOCH A N A MARK-KOCH TAXPAYER mark KOCH A NANCY MARK-KOCfl NAME/ADDR 4149 HIGHWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 38 0711723440021 PROP ADDR 4175 HIGHWOOD RD OWNER NAME MERLIN L HALVERSON TAXPAYER MERLIN L HALVERSON NAME/ADDR 4175 HIGHWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 38 0711723440030 PROP ADDR 4140 HIGHWOOD RD OWNERNAME i D CUSACK A C M GRACE TAXPAYER C GRACE A J CUSACK NAME/ADDR 4140 HIGHWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 38 0711723440088 PROP ADDR 4116 HIGHWOOD RD OWNERNAME PHILLIPMOTTO TAXPAYER PHILUP M OTTO NAME/ADDR 4116 HIGHWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROP PROPERTY 0\. INFORMATION SYSTEM -RSLIST PAGE: I 38 0711723440014 PROP ADDR 4105 HIGHWOOD RD OWNERNAME J D AM J EASLEY TAXPAYER JAMES D A MEUSSA J EASLEY NAME/ADDR 4105 HIGHWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 38 0711723440015 PROP ADDR 4109 HIGHWOOD RD OWNERNAME G W A J LAPPLEBAUM TAXPAYER GEORGE W/iOANNE L APPLEOAUM NAME/ADDR 4109 HIGHWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 38 0711723440019 PROP ADDR 4156 HIGHWOOD RD OWNERNAME FRANCESWWILSON TAXPAYER FRANCES TESAR NAME/ADDR 4156 HIGHWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 38 0711723440020 PROP ADDR 4167 HIGHWOOD RD OWNERNAME MERLIN LHALVERSON TAXPAYER MERUN L HALVERSON NAME/ADDR 4175 HIGHWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 38 0711723440028 PROP ADDR 4150 HIGHWOOD RD OWNERNAME JLDAKKEASMGLYNN TAXPAYER JON L BAKKE NAME/ADDR 4150 HIGHWOOD RD MOUND MN 53364 38 0711723440029 PROP ADDR 4148 HIGHWOOD RD OWNERNAME JANETLEJDE TAXPAYER JANET LEIDE NAME/ADDR 4148 HIGHWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 .•'•N(¥) V., 38 0711723440031 PROP ADDR 4132 HIGHWOOD RD OWNERNAME SCOTT O A CATHERINE ANDERSON TAXPAYER SCOTT 0 A CATHERINE ANDERSON NAME/ADDR 4132 HIGHWOOD ROAD MOUND MN 55364 38 0711723440084 PROP ADDR 4125 HIGHWOOD RD OWNER NAME JOHN W A ROBERTA J HENRICH TAXPAYER JOHN W A ROBERTA J HENRICH NAME/ADDR 4125 HIGHWOOD RD ORONOMN 55364 e 1 38 0711723440089 PROP ADDR 4108 HIGHWOOD RO OWNERNAME JASONMTHEIS TAXPAYER JASON MTHEIS NAME/ADDR 4108 HIGHWOOD RD MOUND MN S5364 I CERTIFY THATTHE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF IhTORMAllON AS IT APPEARSTHIS DATE ONTHE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPARTMENT. TO TOE BEST. OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BEUEF. DATE V-/r-*X BY I %\ c;. ' •^ V* ‘'* • »^ • .• V ' V-■jit::^ r-m ^ 'i ^ m- s M m-e V m-f l• •w; i^-' X&V'--;.-',' J-C* f > «V: 7^ *. ;•:. . .*w .• - i i ♦ ». V ' I... ' : V* ••r , *^*^ i^ % \ •*mr' ^ • . V ^ r •• r’< '• •jrt- • 'i^ite.- * ’>-^ r* » *c» ' >s ‘v, *^;^U; ’ ■r: > **r- ■t • ; -•;• ,■•*• . »• • !1^. vs* r-» ^''■■■■"■ \»U;' ', ' ' •X'<\‘‘ 1 i,'- " ^ '• ,. -‘^ •*’> • , " , -V •.•, ', ■ '•'■. •U. . 1- ' • 'i^ ' . , r ' tr ■ .’ y i-':/^'- . ..iJ^'<5?5» f" . ; V' r:./ .Cv 4 ' S'* •“... ' ...:-/^^\\v—- * • fc'. t .-SCi 'r^ •• ■“ . < •' '••' r 3**«" ■!'l^'.- -;.. . ’tO 4 ai \. 1 r /ti'ic M?//^/,'/-r>n Av'.v' Sfei O',__"Kf I* ;;, ■ ' ' '• <■ '" '.f ^ X- >y?-^yr' ' •' ''^'V:?/ ' A' -• ■ • . ■'^ . •' ? f:^$% kimJk i^, L%a>* './r-.^'N.'-rV ;v )J^liT. >t V’ F^r,VAi - y^- '■'y\ n:-L'lv.v l\ ■f,-- • ' . f 4''" 'f y ' ‘^^■: ‘k' ' «■> ? .^''^ '. ^%-i ^ : t : '. & >>s* . 4--r"""’*-. rm ill b,<-.'4,‘ '' i ■ ’^^Vc ^ r 'V - %"H.jS ■ysyp* '^ A ___1_. ‘V,'.'-p.’| ' ■': • />' t ' »r ^ .* • ssr ~r^^»Ll•*'*-a.~:*y.'^i-<S*t ^ v.-^-. '.■•<5^J-^^-fr-; r;, S- -., ?-,' ■■ i- r~ r . ’ .V•j •♦ . •t52^ -4 S#1 W' / m.•^•-'.fet J.KFMSii 5 % ;- ■ ■'? ■. ■'. - * 4 J y. V . V . > ^ . .. • ^\s5 < ' - -■ r. • y^.*:- * . >» • /: ^ . ■ .SiK' •■ '• .'f^^ - « ^ O . *. -V' At*..-^i^' , 'V&J'' *• -• > . •<» * ‘ ^ -vJ . Wf/.."s'' ■. »; - , . -i:'^ - V,‘ So, ' '’ ^ *!A :-"V-:‘ . ■V P jjijf ■'-v -.:ff ■■"■'• ■•-■''■t^r k ' ■' * • V . __ « •-*, ; •* —•** ■ LS»A^ Kr-r^ ^ *'■ /« ..V ••■.■>. !t i t--* arxrci s»mK .-• ~ rrsi ”S!s ; trim ; m^ '/i •rj^ f A. ' • j . * W. K • -'• ! » -V -^' •-%:,. .V.4K: • ^->T f.'’ ^ ’%'. .'-V'} >4V .. >** -4 y K^’ [•* •■ • > >' *' •’ * 7 ‘ ■ . ssiW'* -V' <r"^ iV ' 'V /*:, •>- J • r" ^ ^ m^ Bii ' .■•^: V- -.- * •■ •^;r::«3gfa -'««f ' -1-- e@^ k- •• V'> .,w.“ T. ’V.': - - -/<: ''t **J,» ; -•'^ • . ,;;.T jTv : - ' \.<*\r.* V-'-A“ ■■ »■H ■ ■ ■ .■.....■ ';i T i i I T/ I ORONO I City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2858 'v' • •. *. V . •V # * * ^ * * A RESOLUTION GRANTING 00 VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE . • • •» •* ,•?: •' .s; • « 4 * k*. SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 t 2 PILE IlSSO WHEREAS, John and Roberta Henrich (hereinafter "the applicants are owners of the property located at 4125 Highwood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lots 19, 20 and 21, Highwood Lake Minnetonka; Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City of Orono for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 & 2 to permit the construction of a room addition, detached garage, and decks, such decks encroaching past the average lakeshore setback line where no encroachment is normally allowed, and such improvements overall constituting additional hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone in excess of the 25% hardcover normally allowed. Minnesota : NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1559. 2. The property is located in the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 16, 1990, and on a vote of 5 to 0 recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: a. Due to the location and orientation of neighboring residences, the average lakeshore setback encroachment has no significant impact on views of the lake enjoyed by neighboring property owners. b. Hardcover on the property is 43.6% in the 75-250' zone. There is excess driveway hardcover on the property that can be removed in conjunction with the proposed additions, resulting in no net increase in hardcover on the property al>ove the pre-existing 43.6% level in the 75-250' zone. Page 1 of 4 i *v. City of ORONQ •VV-!'! I* n . H.-.; CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCII^ NO.2858 The applicants revised their proposal by limiting the size and height of the detached garage to avoid the need for a setback or height variances. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is, necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 & 2 to permit the construction of a 25* x 30' detached garage, 6' x 14' bedroom addition, in addition to decks on the lakeside of the existing residence, such decks encroaching past the average lakeshore setback line where no encroachment is normally allowed, and such additions in total comprising hardcover in excess of the 25% hardcover normally allowed on the property, subject to the following conditions: 1. Hardcover in the 75-250' zone is approved at a level of 43.6%. All existing and proposed hardcover approved with this variance approval is recorded in the calculation worksheet and diagram attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. The current property owner and all future owners of this property are placed on notice that hardcover shall not be increased above the currently approved level and any proposed improvements of this property that will result in additional hardcover must be approved by the City. Such approval may result in a requirement for concurrent equivalent or greater removals of existing hardcover. All existing hardcover scheduled for removal as a condition of this resolution must be removed prior to the footing inspection for the new construction. Page 2 of 4 CITY City of OR.Q1VO «• '»* OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2858 ? ;• z. Because all setbacks and hardcover calculations were reviewed on the basis that the three lots are a single property, applicants shall legally combine for tax purposes Lot 19 with Lot^ 20 and 21, prior to issuance of a building permit for the improvements. 3. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 27, 1991). 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 27th day of August, 1990. ATT IT: lOrbperty Owner(s) lU-H i () mbs R. Grabek, HHyor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of August, 1990, by James R. Grabek 4 Dorothy M. Halim, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. m Notary Public Page 3 of 4 City of ORONO CITY ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2858 STATE OP MINNESOTA )• } ss. ‘: J.« z COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this day of__ _ _ _ ^ _ __ ^ :q __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ before me a Notary Public within and foV said county, personally appeared t-J )cnown to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument/ and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. 1990 J L NOTARY PUBLIC MY COi IRES STATE OP MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of __ _ _ _ _ _/ 199_/ before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person (s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed tlie same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 4 of 4 V j 0 RESOLUTION If2858 STATE OF HINNESOTA COUNTT OF HENNEPIN CITT OF O80N0 ) ) ) ) > iU''' . '1 ■ •' ■ I Dorothy H. Hallln, City Clerk of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have ooopared the foregoing copy of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Orono with the original record of such resolution in the Minutes of the proceedings of said'City Council at a meeting of said City Council held on August 27_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, 1990 , and that the same is a true and correct copy of said resolution was duly adopted by said City Council at said meeting. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 28th_ _ _ _, day of _ _ _ _ _August_ _ _;_ _ _ » 1990 'othy KT Hhllin, City Clerk (SEAL) • • • • /'^ < I ■( f i ‘ T 1 V. ‘‘‘^ f ' -'^JL> >-/i 'o:,'..:." ^ y ^t • \* . ,. r.*t • • J -j* ^4 •J; r t«i*w«» 4(0UtC ^^r_A £&ol. ^ ■ -?»£i J ^/.- • ♦%V*J 4 4.^% V: -• f * ^ •►••A <■’«. i. ' ?• tr- '% .> t" '<:> i •V t:. *-! ,,V.-» r >'•{in f^!?2 S (IBSiSS^k <9 Sm l-?il ocen S llsi « O *••-- •ft »•• • • »*■ *x» ■ * ^» l« • -.• MncnvH atmunm .u«^.. , - : stTiMC Mi (CMU am) 0-7S* j^gJ^ 253rSC0* SOO-igoO' -i2. r^v-. GuiriM iUiiooBvii IN Zbih • • - -^.a:z2*2ir.-a' - ••“ • wtan • •'- —— • * ^ 2^ V«ri«Ac» AppXieatioa ilSS9 - NodlhcAtioaa \ 'Johm mad Bob«rtA ■•arlch-s-w^^ •• - - ••w •"•*.•*** -S-. .**; V- * ■ ^ •• ;p^w«B .•. «.r. S.9. a. ftuuai . c OiiviMAr r; 4. j y c S-ro 5.4. a a. SiocNALX c. Patio / Oicx ‘ I- a.LMfoacANi AiCAS UNOfXLAlNIT PLAgrtC MiriM OlWI Totm. IaIDCBVtII M Zbm - <.r. fT7 j— •• ' ' • —— *—* rmiL hVOTT A m«'w ZOM - ^^3 «... fYl •. • « M • I *!• » • • ■ # . , ■.,. 0______.40_____ • •mbmmbw* * * * MHwaMwM* ^ «■ ***^^^^ *• Nat additloaal daek Nardeovar propaaad: . CIS 1 lil ♦ Cr X 7) ♦ CJ X i) 270 ♦ 4f ♦ If • JJT a.f. Nat additiaoaX kardcovar la addition ■ 0 a.f. iUIC Nat additioaal garafa hardeovar: (2S X 30) - (14 X If) . 820 a.f. Nat additioaal drivawar hardcovar: Cf X 301 ♦ ((17 X 41/2) a 214 a.f. « Total not additional ■ 337 ♦ 826 ♦ 214 a 1.077 a.f. Iteaoval of eurraat hardeooar: Old dock portion 3 X 10 Waikvar froa dock 3 X If OrivawaT 37 X 10 > 30 a.f. * S4 a.f. a 370 a.f. Orivoaar (24 X 22) «• ((19 X 22)/2) • 737 a.f. Total hardcovar raaoval a 1.191 a.f. lardcarar Siiaaarr for tha 78* • 280* aaaa 75* - 280* araa a 14.04O a.f. CaiatiBg; f.3f0 a.f.a 42.gg Propoaad aat additioaal: 1,077 a.f.a t.4N Total prapaaad: 7,487 a.f.a 81.OX Laaa hardcovar raaovala: »1.171 a.f.a - g,o« Total:f.2ff a.f.a 43.0X 'fT/foA^ ,/C k . _i ■ A RESOLUTION DENYING VARIANCES PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2, SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION I6(L), AND SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 14(C) FILE m-2S9S WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, pursuant to State Statutes 412 et. scq. and 462 et. seq., the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted zoning regulation for the protection of the public health, safety and general wellhre; and WHEREAS, Gary Germundsen (hereinafter “the applicant”) is the owner of the property located at 4101 Highw ood Road w ithin the City of Orono (hereinafter “the City ”) and legally described as follows: Lot 15, Highwood Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter “the property ”); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for v ariances to permit construction of a second stor>’ lakeside deck, requesting the following approvals; 1.Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision (16)(L): To allow 2,483 s.f. (50.5%) hardcover in the 75 - 250 ’ zone where 25% is nonnallv allowed. Section 10.03. Subdivision 14 (C): To allow structural coverage to increase from 1,528 s.f. (17.9%) to 1,708 s.f (20%) when 1.500 s.f. is normally allowed. WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the application; the recommendation of the City staff and Planning Commission; and the comments and written statements submitted by the applicant. Page 1 of 4 f .1 NOW» THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono. Minnesota licrcby denies the requested variances as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning this property: 1. The property consists of .20 acres, or 8,550 s.f. in land area. 2. Renewal variances were granted in 2001 (Resolution Number 4645) o • this property to permit construction of the existing home. This resolution placed hardcover limits on the property which stated “.Any hardcover in addition to that noted will require variance approval by the City and is not likely to be approved in the future unless concurrent removals of pre existing hardcover result in no hardcover increase above the 40% allowance." 3. The house was built in 2001 with a sliding glass door off the lake side of the home. 1 he Building Code does allow for a sliding glass door in place of a window but it must be obstructed with either a railing or board. The sliding glass door does not constitute the applicants' right to construct a lakeside deck. 4. It is the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code to protect the water quality of Lake Minnetonka by limiting the amount of hardcover and structural coverage a lot contains. No hardship exists on this lot that would constitute variance approval for additional hardco\ er or structural co\erage. 5. The granting of the requested variances would be contrary to the provisions of Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.08. Subdivision 3 (A) with which the applicant must first comply in order that variance be granted. The Council finds that: a. The pro,..iiy in question can be put to a reasonable use if used under the conditions allowed by the official controls if the proposed variances were denied. b. The plight of the landowner is not due to circumstances unique to his property but rather circumstances created by the landowner. Page 2 of 4 c. Granting of the proposed variances would appear to serve as a convenience to the applicants and the applicants have not demonstrated a reasonable hardship or practical difficulty acceptable to the City Council. d. The conditions of the 2^ning Code limits imposed and existing on this property generally apply to all other land and structures in the zoning district in which this property is located as well as in adjacent residential zoning districts. 6.The City Council has considered this application including the find ngs and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on tliis 11* day of August, 2003. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara Peterson, Mayor Page 3 of 4 . _____ i J STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 11'*' day of August, 2003, by Barbara Peterson & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of4 ■ i Dale Application Received: 5>2<M)3 Dale Appiication Considered as Complcle: 5-23m3 60-Day Review Period Eipires: 7-22-03 Eitcnded on 6-20-03 to: 9-20-03 AU6 1 1 2003 CITY OF ORONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CONSENT AGENDA ITEM Date: August 6,2003 Item No.: ^ Deparlment Approval: Administrator Approval: Name: Michael P. Gafiron Tide: Planning Director / Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: 1^03-2904 Richard S. Brown, 1300 Shoreline Drive - After-the-Fact Variance - Resolution List of Exhibits A - Resolution B - Notice of Council Action 7-30-03 Application Summary: On July 28 Council voted 4-0 to approve the proposed hardcover removal plan resulting in a level of 39.7%, directing staff to draft a resolution for adoption on August 11, incorporating the following conditions: 1.Existing encroachments of wetland or required wetland setbacks by retaining walls, fill or paved surfaces shall be removed. 2.Retaining walls shall be removed wherever they extend outside the property boundaries, and any walls to remain within 5' of the lot lines shall be reviewed by staff to determine whether they are needed to support steep slopes or whether they are purely aesthetic in nature, and those not necessary to support the topography of the site shall be removed. 3. All landscape beds lined with fabric or plastic shall have such liner removed. Staff Recommeiidatioii Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution incorporating the Council ’s July 28 action. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt or amend the attached resolution. m J A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND 10.56 SUBDIVISION 16(LK2) - FILE #03-2904 WHEREAS, Richard S. Brown (hereinafter "the applicant ”) is owner of the property located at 1300 Shoreline Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lots 10, II, and 12, Block 14, Minnetonka Bluffs, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivision 2 and 10.56 Subdivision 16(LX2) to allow hardcover in excess of the 35% hardcover normally allowed in the 500-1000' lakeshore setback zone. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #03-2904. The property is located in the RR-IB Zoning District where the minimum lot area requirement is 2 acres in area. 3.Variances for lot area, lot width and front, side and rear setbacks were approved for the property via Resolution No. 4072 on April 27,1998. Pursuant to said variances, a building permit was issued for construction of a new residence on the property. The building permit was issued in part based upon a submitted site plan indicating proposed hardcover would meet the 35% hardcover limit for the 500-1000' zone in which the property is located. Page 1 of 6 4. 5. 6. The applicant purchased the home in November 2002 and prior to closing inquired of the City as to whether the property was in compliance. As no Certificate of Occupancy had yet been issued nor requested, and no inspections had been called for in more than a year, staff visited the site and concluded that hardcover appeared to potentially be excessive. The applicant then executed an agreement drafted by the City Attorney to allow temporary occupancy while the matter of excessive hardcover was resolved. Applicant then had an as-built survey performed, which confirmed that the hardcover was at 50.8%, in excess of the 35% allowed, and portions are outside of the property boundaries and potentially encroach on required wetland setbacks. The Orono Planning Commission initially reviewed this application proposing a reduction to 45.9% hardcover on June 16, 2003; tabled the proposal for further reductions, and reviewed a revised proposal for hardcover removals on July21,2003. Planning Commission voted 5-2 in favor of a recommendation to allow hardcover level of 39.7% on the property per the revised proposal. On July 28,2003 the City Council voted 4-0 to approve an after-the-fact variance to allow hardcover on the property to exist at a level of 39.7%, based upon the following unique findings and hardships: A.Due to the site layout and variety of locations and elevations of access points for the property, there is a practical difficulty in providing for vehicular and pedestrian accessibility to the residence without the levels of hardcover proposed. B,The circumstances leading to the need for excess hardcover include an original hardcover proposal that did not completely indicate the magnitude of hardcover that would be needed to service the site; and the fact that the applicant in good faith purchased the property under an expectation that the hardcover excesses could be readily eliminated, and only after the purchase learned of the actual extent of the excess. C.The proposed hardcover at 39.7% where 35% is normally allowed is a reason.ible compromise by the applicant in light of the history of the property, and the reductions as proposed will result in a level of hardcover that is necessary to provide reasonable accessibility to the residence, and will Page 2 of 6 1 r eliminate any encroachment of the wetland located east of the property while removing retaining walls that are not necessary to support the topographic changes on the site. 7.The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 8.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby ^^ts variances to Municipal Zoning code Sections 10.22, Subdivision 2 and 10.56 Subdivision 16(L)(2) to allow hardcover in the amount of 39.7% in the 500-1000 ’ lakcshorc setback zone, subject to the following conditions; 1.Hardcover is approved at a level of 39.7% (7,693 s.f.) per the approved site plan attached hereto as Exhibit A. All required hardcover removals shall be completed as soon as possible, and a final Certificate of Occupancy shall be granted only upon completion of the removals. Applicant is advised that any future proposals for additional hardcover on the property will likely not be approved, but might be approved only in conjunction with concurrent hardcover removals to result in no net hardcover increase on the property. 2.Existing encroachments of wetland or required wetland setbacks by retaining walls, fill or paved surfaces shall be removed. Page 3 of 6 3.Retaining walls shall be removed wherever they extend outside the property boundaries, and any walls to remain within 5' of the lot lines shall be reviewed by staff to determine whether they are needed to support steep slopes or whether they are purely aesthetic in nature, and those not necessary to support the topography of the site shall be removed. 4. 5. All landscape beds lined with fabric or plastic shall have such liner removed. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by completion of the removals within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 11,2004) and the property owner will be considered to be in violation of the terms of this resolution. 6.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7.The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 11th day of August, 2003. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 4 of6 t i i STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this__day of ^2003 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of .,2003 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of6 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of ..20 personally appeared before me, ____who is personally known to me ____whose identity I proved on the basis of. whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation of a credible witness and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public Page 6 of6 iiiteiiM CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 (952) 249-4600 ZONING nLE #03-2904 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION DATE OF NOTICE; July 30, 2003 TO: Richard S. Brown 1300 Shoreline Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES: TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETING: July 28, 2003 VOTE: 4 FOR 0 AGAINST Motion: To approve the proposed hardcover removal plan resulting in a level of 39.7%, directing staff to draft a resolution for adoption on August 11, incorporating the following conditions; I.Existing encroachments of wetland or required wetland setbacks by retaining walls, fill or paved surfaces shall be removed. 2.Retaining walls shall be removed wherever they extend outside the property boundaries, and any walls to remain within 5' of the lot lines shall be reviewed by sUff to determine whether they are needed to support steep slopes or whether they are purely aesthetic in nature, and those not necessary to support the topography of the site shall be removed. 3. All landscape beds lined with fabric or plastic shall have such liner removed. The August 11 meeting begins at 7:00 p.m. This item will be placed on the consent agenda. If you have any questions please contact Mike Gaffron at 952-249-4600. If you desire certified cop:cs of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. ft \ ff Dale Application Received: S-21-03 Dale Application Considered at Complete: 5-22-03 Initial 60-Day Review Period Eipired: 7-21-03 6-23-03 Extension of Review period to: 9-19-03 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION m \ ' 2003 CITY ohunu Date: August 6,2003 Item No.: ^ Department Approval:Adminiitrator Approval: Name: Michael P. Gaffron Title: Planning Director Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #03-2907 Jeff & Cara Ziebarth, 720 North Arm Drive - Variances - Revised Plan - Resolution List of Exhibits A - Revised Site & Drainage Plan Submitted 8-5-03 B - Revised Plan and Elevation Views Submitted 8-5-03 C - Comparison of Elevation View - Initial Proposal and Revised Proposal D - Staff Sketch Comparison Showing Proposed Overhang Encroachments E - Notice of Council Action 7-30-03 F - Selected Exhibits from 7-24-03 Staff Memo 2. 3. 4. On July 28 Council voted 4-0 to grant partial approval of the requested variances, subject to applicants providing revised plans for Council and neighbor review, per the following parameters: 1. Approval for the second story structure encroachment within 0-75' setback zone, 65* from the shoreline. Denial of the side setback variance for second story of structure to encroach within 4.3' of left side lot line and within 2.4' of right side lot line, because the resulting structure would tend to overshadow' adjoining properties and lead to future maintenance issues. Denial of the side setback variances for the attached garage addition to encroach within 6' of the left side lot line, as it can be shifted to meet 10' required side setback with some interior design changes. Approval of the removal of the existing 423 s.f. deck in 0-75' zone, subject to replacement with a smaller 95 s.f. deck as proposed, still slightly encroaching the average setback line. Approval of the hardcover variances as proposed, finding that the plan reflects what appears to be the minimum hardcover necessary to support a reasonable residence on the property, as follows: a) Hardcover in the 0-75' zone will be reduced from 1058 s.f. (29.4%) to 535.3 s.f. (14.8%) where no hardcover is allowed, by reducing deck steps and concrete slab areas. b) Hardcover in 75-250' zone will be reduced from 2257.1 s.f. (51.9%) to 1961.38 s.f. (45.1 %) where 25% is allowed. Applicant to provide a suitable drainage plan be developed prior to final Council action. 5. #03-2907 720 North Arm Drive Auguil 6,2003 Page 2 Council directed stafTto prepare a resolution for review and adoption on August 11. Council noted that the neighboring property owners should be provided the opportunity to review final plans, including the drainage plan. New Roof Encroachment Issue The revised plans provided by the applicants appear to have shifted the garage footprint so that it is centered on the property and meeting the 1 O' side setbacks. However, other changes to the house plan appear to be iu potential conflict with the Council ’s intent of denying the side setback variances for the new construction. To summarize the changes: > The roofline of the second story addition has been rotated 90 degrees, so that the gable ends now face the lake and the street rather than the sides. The second story is now almost entirely contained within a 13/12 pitch gabled roof that extends from the east end of the house to the west end of the new garage, and extends the full width of the house for that entire length. The roof over the garage has become a continuation of the new roof over the second story addition, rather than a separate, slightly low er roof system. The result is that the roof at the front line of the new garage overhangs within 4* of the northerly side lot line and within 0.9' of the southerly side lot line. While some cutouts in the roof on the south side of the garage will lend some openness to this area, this new encroachment by a 13/12 pitch overhang w'ill tend to have some of the same visual massing effects as if the garage wall itself was there. (See Exhibit D) A north side elevation was not provided, so it is not known whether these cutouts are proposed on the north side. The overhangs along the garage (5* on the north side, 8'+ on the south side, based on the site plan; 6.5' on each side based on the elevation views - which is accurate??) are an encroachment of the side yard which brings a new variance element into the mix. Allowing a roof overhang within 0.9’ of a lot line where no encroachment currently exists, is not justifiable in staffs opinion. From a design aesthetic standpoint, forcing vertical walls along the garage may not be attractive, but would be completely functional and avoid this encroachment that adds mass to the house. The plan sets provided to staff this week are not to scale; they arc offby as much as 5-10%, making it difficult to determine the actual relationships between the old plans and the new plans, or how close to lot lines specific plan elements really are. Hardcover Hardcover calculations reflecting the revised layout have not been submitted. My assumption is that the hardcover proposal has not changed; but the apparent 6' overhangs 8' above the ground would likely be counted as hardcover. niawr #03-2907 72 North Arm Drive Aogiut 6, Z'<03 Pafe3 Drainage The drainage plan arrived late this week. Tom Kellogg has not had an opportunity to review it as of this writing. The plan indicates the creation of a swale along the north lot line. Part of this swale is under the proposed garage overhang. On paper, this would ^pear to move the drainage along the lot line as desired; staff and the City Engineer will have to inspect the site to determine if the drainage plan is feasible. Staffhas had no contact with the neighboring property owners regarding their review of the plans. Staff Reconmiendation The plans provided raise enough new questions that staffhas not drafted a resolution for Council consideration. Rather, staff requests that Council address the new encroachment by the roof system, and if no hardship is presented to support the encroachment, the plan should be rejected. Additionally, the applicants should be asked to provide an elevation view of the north side, and should provide new hardcover calculations to show that the approved levels have been met. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Address the revised plans, especially the new encroachment of the roof system. Provide direction to applicant and staff as to whether this encroachment is acceptable. If so, direct staff to draft a resolution for your next meeting. If not, direct applicant to revise plans for further review. I-. r-T' 1 1 # \• •1 /i * I • ' f f . : • **4 . -i1 ! .- 1 1 % 1 !\\1 ‘ J ;:. i r ^. • ^ll %•%•. • » - vi' ^ • 9 ] ^ • ^ ..Iv.1 ^ •*>^ . - r-r^■* ♦ ni T1 1 1 ^ 1 .f ; •j" • 1 t«i<iif»r..!iif n 1 r 11LattJb 4 * . * H j* >1' V' rsnritz:*zii IF r i v * / m V • 4f 4-- ■».'- ^■v d.- »■ ‘ V* • . 1-. '^; -.; ■ ^r" * • ' ♦ * .* :. • • ’ ... ’ n ^ 1 » ! 1 •i i » f i iL$ • *s %- « : i 11• . i • 1 * • tt rfc; rJ^T^a t ■ ^ > I ^ *V' 03 PlAt^ \l\e^ s\^ 1 !iwiir'.iivll wi^ i/i«^ # A k' f ? f ' ♦. 1 _ ■ •j (1 f. ! ^1 •> Vi -' t W« < f'# f:i:.:y r # ; e illsmm v--^ . ■..'v• -'. / • > :>.3A w i i ' i f{/ * *p ! p P"^ g.i.g% 4^. tuftf L'UP ^ _ « . ■»• *• • — ■i.Liafc., 11 4 i A C -a/ ■ V • t # c / F r 0 9 t $t. 0* «.*<M a « ^ % •%1§K qF *=*i Lt h.% /# <• • I ' ^ 1.. .-1 ^ f ! i 1 ^ •—1 —1 .........^ 1» ^1_! ... .-J iU.rk Sjr.Total 1 S.F. (<S8J2 &F. Removed) Eiiittnf Hofd Cover SJ*. 419.61 SJ>. BaMagOnvela 90.88 SJ>. )S]iiitiiifBiL-642.16SJ*. EiMof Cone. Sidewalk ■ 462 SJ*. Bsteing RetaiaWaU « 16.07 SJ>. Total-22S7JO SJr. Proposed Hard Cover Removal 75-250 Foot Zone Existing H oqm Removed ■ >84.00 SJ>. Existing Oange Removed = >419.61 S J>. Existing Gnvel Removed ■ >90.88 SP. Existing Bit Removed ■ -642.16 SP.. Existing Cone. Side. Removed a >462 S.P. Existing Retain. WaU a 16.07 SP. Total a 558J5 SP. (1698J5 SP. Removed) _ jCoovo^rr:* revive. w«M _____ s.WU«>rU.^-.J^UAf!JS C>APU*^ Iam#-»G ^.(j,-Q\ \j\ev^ I I I ) ! VOlT^ 0M^:<im^L I \ ! ? t (/j tf'MC4C»«eK'«Ma dVe»ea4i4)6 4 ■ ! i i i I 4 H H i CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 (952) 249-4600 ZONING FILE #03-2907 SU03 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: July 30, 2003 TO: Jeff & Cara Ziebarth 820 Bayside Lane Minnetrista, MN 55364 COPIES: TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances DATE OF MEETING: July 28, 2003 VOTE: 4 FOR 0 AGAINST Motion: To approve per the Planning Commission and stafT recommendation, as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Approval for the second story structure encroachment within 0-75' setback zone, 65' from the shoreline. Denial of the side setback variance for second story of structure to encroach within 4.3' of left side lot line and within 2.4' of right side lot line, because the resulting structure would tend to overshadow adjoining properties and lead to future maintenance issues. Denial of the side setback variances for the attached garage addition to encroach within 6' of the left side lot iine, as it can be shifted to meet 10' required side setback with some interior design changes. Approve the removal of the existing 423 s.f. deck in 0-75' zone, subject to replacement with a smaller 95 s.f deck as proposed, still slightly encroaching the average setback line. Approval of the hardcover variances as proposed, finding that the plan reflects what appears to be the minimum hardcover necessary to support a reasonable residence on the property, as follows: a) Hardcover in the 0-75' zone will be reduced from 1058 s.f (29.4%) to 535.3 s.f (14.8%) where no hardcover is allowed, by reducing deck steps and concrete slab areas. b) Hardcover in 75-250' zone will be reduced from 2257.1 s.f (51.9%) to 1961.38 s.f (45.1%) where 25% is allowed. Applicant to provide a suitable drainage plan be developed prior to final Council action. Council directed staff to prepare a resolution for review and adoption on August 11. Council noted that the neighboring property jwners should be provided the opportunity to review final plans, including the drainage pla... Please submit final plan revisions and drainage plan as soon as possible for review and inclusion in the Council packet. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Council - Monday, August 11, 2003; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. s . A Co*...... ..——Mfi Date AppUcatkm Rccdvcd: 6>lS-03 Date AppUcatton Conildcrcd as Complete: 7-9^3 60-Day Review Period Eipirei: 9-7-03 Aue 1 1 2003 CITY OF ORONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CONSENT AGENDA ITEM Date: Augusts,2003 Item No.: 7 Department Approval:Administralor Approval: Name: Michael P. Gafiron Title: Planning Director Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: /^03-2916 Phillip Smith, 2600 West Lafayette Road - Variances- Resolution List of Exhibits A - Resolution B - Notice of Council Action 7/3 1/03 On July 28 Council voted 4-0 to approve the proposed variances subject to 1 ;1 concurrent hardcover removals, and directed staff to draft a resolution for approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt or amend the attached resolution. li 1 I r SET !« A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.24, SUBDIVISION SB; 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2; 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8; AND 10.56, SUBDIVISIONS 16(C) AND 16(L) - FILE NO. 03-2916 WHEREAS, Phillip J Smith and Jennifer A. Pastrick-Smith, husband and wife (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 2600 West Lafayette Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows: Tracts B, D and E, R.L.S. No. 131, Hennepin County, Minnesota; (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22 Subd. 2 and 10.56 Subd. 16(L)(1&2) to allow hardcover on the property in excess of the hardcover amounts normally allow’ed, and a variance to Sections 10.22, Subd. 1, lO.SS Subd. 8 and 10.56 Subd. 16(C) to allow a second story addition over the existing residence located less than 75' from the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka where no structure is normally allowed. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #03-2916. The property is located in the LR-IB Lakeshore Residential Zoning District, which requires minimum lot area of 1.0 acres and minimum lot width of 140'. The lot has a defined width of 160' and is 0.705 acres in area. 3.The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on July 21,2003 and recommended conditional approval of the requested variances on a 7-0 vote based on the following findings: Page 1 of 7 1 :u The property contains an existing residence structure and attached garage. The applicants wish to construct a second story addition over a portion of the existing house and attached garage which is located partially within 75' of the shoreline; and construct porch and attached garage additions in the 7S-2S0' zone constituting additional hardcover on the property. Existing hardcover in the 0-75* zone is 2,561 s.f. or 21.3% where no hardcover is normally allowed. Existing hardcover in the 75-250' zone is 3,829 s.f. or 20.5%. The total allowable hardcover for the property is 4,670 s.f. (25% of the 75-250' zone). Total existing hardcover on the property is 6,390 s.f., or an excess of 1,720 s.f. The proposed encroachment of the 0-75' zone is caused by raising the roof over the northerly 1/3 of the existing garage/lst story by approximately 5' to accommodate vaulted space within the roof and new don.-icrs. The new roofline will match the existing roof over the southerly 2/3 .. tl-. house, and meets all height limitations. The visual impact of the 1 i roof line is minimal, and this will still by definition probably only be a i I !!storyhome when the additions are completed. The increase in the bulk of structure within 75' of the lake is minimized by constructing a half-story rather than a full second story. The hardship which supports this addition is the existing location of the house which was constructed prior to enactment of current zoning code restrictions. Existing hardcover in the 0-75' zone includes portions of the existing house, a small storage shed, and a patio area. Existing hardcover in the 75-250' zone includes portions of the existing house and garage, driveway, sidewalks and stairways, and landscape areas. The proposed additions result in a 601 s.f. hardcover increase in the 75-250' zone absent any concurrent hardcover removals. Applicant proposed to remove 1 s.f. of existing hardcover in the 0- 75' zone for each 2 s.f. of hardcover addition in the 75-250' zone. The Planning Commission finds that this 1 :2 tradeoff is inconsistent with City policy and past practice for similar hardcover variance requests, and recommends a 1:1 concurrent removal, resulting in no net increase in hardcover on the property. Page 2 of7 ^ • e) The proposed hardcover variance for the property is only appropriate if conditioned on removal of all existing fabric and plastic Tncrs from landscaped areas to make them non-hardcover. The hardcover variance is justified based on the location of the house requiring excessive driveway to reach the garage, and due to the private driveway status of the roMway accessing the property, which severely limits visitor parking and results in the need to provide parking on-site. The hardcover variance is also supported by the topography of the site, which allows runoff from the west half of the house to drain westward a distance 300'-plus before it reaches the lake, allowing for additional infiltration. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that he conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22 Subd. 2 and 10.56 Subd. 16(LK1&2) to allow hardcover on the property in excess of the hardcover amounts normally allowed, and a varance to Sections 10.22, Subd. 1, lO.SS Subd. 8 and 10.56 Subd. 16(C) to allow a second story addition over the existing residence located less than 75' from the OH WL of Lake Minnetonka where no structure is normally allowed, subject to the following conditions: Page 3 of? 1. 2. 3. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicant and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Any revisions to the site plan which are not in conformity with the conditions of this approval resolution will require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2. The hardcover variances are approved as follows: a) All existing plastic or fabric landscape bed liner material shall be removed from the site, as such liners are considered as hardsurface but are not allowed to be considered in hardcover calculations. b) The proposed hardcover additions of 601 s.f. in the 75-250* zone shall be offset by concurrent 1:1 hardcover removals of 601 s.f. The square footage to be removed may occur in the 0-75* and/or 75-250* zones, as noted below. Hardcover in the 0-75* zone shall be reduced by 301 s.f to a maximum level of 2,260 s.f (18.8%) and such reductions shall as a minimum include the existing shed and portions of existing patio. The existing shed may remain on the property in the 75- 250* zone if applicant so desires, but the shed will then be counted as hardcover in the 75-250* zone. As a result of the proposed additions and hardcover reductions, hardcover in the 75- 250* zone may increase by no more than 601 s.f to a maximum level of 4,430 s.f (23.7%), as long as concurrent removals result in overall hardcover on the property never exceeding the pre-existing level of 6,390 s.f Hardcover removals may be staged to occur concurrently with the various proposed additions. Authorities granted by this resolution run with tite property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (August 11,2004). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 4 of 7 WZ. - -c 4. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of the tqpplicants and the applicants’ heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 1 1th day of August, 2003. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 5 of 7 I i f : !l • i ■a j ) » 1 J STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this__day of .2003 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instnunent was executed on behalf of th*' City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNFi'J'i The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of .,2003 by Linda S. Vce, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal cc.'po^'ation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 6 cf 7 'I STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of ,2003, personally ^>peared before me, ____ who is personally known to me ____whose identity I proved on the basis of, whose identity I proved on the oath/aflirmation of. a credible witness and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their fixe act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of . 2003, personally appeared before me, ____who is personally known to me ____whose identity I proved on the basis of, whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation of, a credible witness and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public Page 7 of7 ,k CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 (952) 249^ ZONING FILE #03-2916 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION I DATE OF NOTICE: July 31. 2003 TO:Phillip Smith 2600 West Lafayette Road Excelsior. MN 55331 COPIES: TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances DATE OF MEETING:VOTE: 4 FOR 0 AGAINST Motion: To approve per the Planning; Commission recommendation, subject to 1:1 hardcover removals to result in no net increase in hardcover. Staff to draft a resolution for adoption at August 11 Council meeting, such resolution to allow staging of hardcover removals concurrent with the various addition projects, and not require shed removal until garage project is occurs. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Connell - Monday. Angust 11. 2003; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. Note: Resolution will be on consent agenda, yonr attendance b optbwaL If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. If you have any questions, please contact Mike Gaffron at 952-249-4600. i Date Application Received: 6-18-03 Date Application Coniidercd as Complete: 6-18-03 60-Day Review Period Eapires: 8-17-03 ...... ..— m \ ' 2003 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION cut Ol* iONO CONSENT AGENDA ITEM Date: August 6,2003 Hem No.: ^ Department Approval:Administrator Approval: Name: Michael P. Gaflron Title: Planning Director Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #03-2920 St. Edward the Confessor Episcopal Church, 865 North Femdale Road - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution List of Exhibits A - Resolution B - Notice of Planning Commission Action 7-30-03 C - Memo and Exhibits of July 17,2003 Application Summary: The church structure was destroyed by fire in April, 2002. The foundation remains, and it is proposed to be re-used. During review of City files, staff foui'id that no conditional use permit had ever been issued for church use, hence re-use of ih. i,.;; U.r church use will require a CUP approval. This review will also include a brief site plan reviev/, although most aspects of the site are not changing. Zoning District: Lot Area: RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential, 2-acre min. 4.28 acres (186,348 s.f.) Planning Commbsion Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed this item at their July 21 meeting and on a vote of 7-0 recommended approval as proposed. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval per the Planning Commission recommendation and per the findings and conditions of the attached resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt or amend the attached resolution. • . r F • A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.28, SUBDIVISION 3A AND 10.20, SUBDIVISION 3B, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 865 FERNDALE ROAD NORTH HLE NO. #03-2920 WHEREAS, St. Edward the Confessor Episcopal Church (hereinafter “the “applicant”) is owner of the property located at 865 Fcmdale Road North within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.28, Subdivision 3(A) and 10.20, Subdivision 3(B) to permit a church use on the property in the RR-IB zoning disuict; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 21,2003, at \\ hich time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, HNDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #03-2920. Churches are a conditional use in the RR-1B zoning district, subject to the proposed use meeting all requirements of the Zoning Chapter and subject to Conditional Use Permit approval by the City Council. Page 1 of7 3. 4. 5. 6. St. Edwards was originally granted Council approval for a building permit for a c urch on the property in 1966. The church building was subsequently constructed However. City records indicate no fonnal CUP wm ever granted for the church use. The church building was destroyed by fire in Apnl 2002, and the congregation has decided to rebuild in the same location using the existing foundation. The church was granted a CUP to permit the use of a day care/pre-school in July 1987, making use of lower level spaces in the church building. That CUP remains in cfiect. The existing/proposed building location is centered on this 4+ acre properly, and meets all pertinent building setback requirements. Thebuilding location is more than 26 from dehneated wetlands in the NE and NW comers of the site, reconstruction of a church building on the same foundation is acceptable subject to confirmation by the applicants that the foundation can stmcturally suppoi t the proposed new building. Parking for the church use is reflated in terms of minimum number of spaces and location. The number of stalls i.s determined by the seating capacity of the main assembly room at a rate of 1 stall per 4 seats. The main worship area has seating designated for 143 persons, with an ovcrllow area for an additional 40, totaling 183 persons: © Main Assembly Room Seating Capacity: 183 Required Parking Stalls per Seat: 0.25 Required Parking Stalls: Proposed Parking: 46 59 Stalls approximately 80 stalls; the westerly parking wing is proposed to be converted to a bituminous turnaround and a meditation garden The Ci yhM no past parking issues with St. Edwards, and the proposed paridngn will still yield a conforming number of stalls..t I ^ “open parking spaces on lots must have a location other than a required yard except that such parking may be located in a rear yard Jo within ten feet of an interior side lot line and to within ten feet of a rear lot wif’i parking lot ranges from 10* to 15' from the southerly lot line. While the south lot line is a side lot line and not a rear lot line, parking is not proposed to be relocated. The City is aware o f no past issues with the parking on this Page 2 Of7 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. No new signage has been proposed. The primary sign is located in the NE comer of the site, meeting the 10' property line setback requirement and posing no problems for traffic. In “R ” Districts, one nameplate sign for each use permitted by CUP is allowed with no more than 12 s.f. per surface. The existing pemianent sign is approximately 50 s.f. in area of each side and would require a variance if it were to be replaced. A second, smaller hanging banner type sign is along North Femdale at the driveway entrance, approximately 2' x 4' or smaller per side, no more than 10-15 s.f. total of both sides. Continued use of the existing signage is acceptable, subject to the condition that any new signs would need to be submitted for review prior to issuance of a permit. The existing church driveway accesses North Femdale Road approximately220 south of the Femdalc/Co. Rd. 6 intersection. This access point is appropriate and poses no problems for sight distance. Re-use of the existing foundation and conversion of portions of the westerly parking lot will have little if any impact on the drainage of the site. No grade changes are proposed. New amenities to the site will include a bituminous walkway leading from the parking lot to the lower level, presumably for handicap access, and a new stairway adjacent to the east wall of the building is proposed. A 24 ’ x 40' bituminous or concrete ‘patio’ apron is proposed at the walkout level, meeting the 26' wetland setback. No lighting plan has been indicated on the submitted plans. City ordinances require that light souices not be visible at the lot lines. The site is served with sewer from Plyanouth, but has its own well. Because the new church building will be required to be fitted with a fire suppression sprinkler system, the church is advised to work with the City of Plymouth to obtain municipal water supply. The proposed building has a peak height of 47' above the high side grade adjacent to the building. City code establishes by definition that height is measured to “the average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. The defined height Page 3 of7 —^ 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. of the proposed building using the main roof gable running from end to end of the building IS 28.8', meeting the required 30* limit. The only potentially affected neighboring properties are two homes located approximately 200' south of the site, which are significantly separated from the parking lot so as to minimize any real impacts; and a home to the west with significant separation and screening from the church buildings and parking areas. Staff has not received any comments from neighboring property owners. The church is proposing to construct an accessory detached storage building up to 200 s.f. in area to be located generally southwest of the main church building. Such structure must be located at least 50' from property boundaries. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 21, 2003 and recommended approval as proposed on a vote of 7 to 0. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit for continued use of the probity for a church use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recominendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed conditional use permit on the health safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS aBased upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants - conc^moiial use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.28, Subdivision 3(A) and 10.20 Subdi v'lsion 3(B) to permit a church use on the property located at 865 Femdale Road North, subject to the following conditions: P«gc4of7 J 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ATTEST: The property shall remain in conformance with the site plan attached as Exhibit A to this resolution. Any future alteration to the site plan, that will expand the conditional use, shall require an amendment to this conditional use permit approval. Future replacement of site signage will require separate review and approval at the time such signage is proposed. An accessory storage building up to 200 s.f. in area may be constructed generally southwest of the church building, shall meet a minimum setback of at least 50* from all lot lines, and shall be subject to a separate building permit prior to installation. Authorities granted by this resolution lun with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (August 11,2004). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 11th day of August, 2003. Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner (s) Pages of 7 r m STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Theforegoinginstnunentwasacknowledgedbcforcmeonthis dayof 2003 ”■* Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instniment was ackiiowledged before me on this dayof 2003 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono. a Minnesota municipal coiporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 6 of7 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of ..20 personally appeared before me, ____who is personally known to me ____whose identity I proved on the basis of whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmaticn of a credible witness and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of ..20 personally appeared before me, ____who is personally known to me ____whose identity I proved on the basis of whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation of a credible witness and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that hc/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public •I • Page 7 Of7 € CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 (952) 249-4600 ZONING HLE #03-2920 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: July 30, 2003 TO:Rev. Judy Hoover St. Edward the Confessor Episcopal Church 125 East Wayzata Boulevard Wayzala, MN 55391 COPIES: LynnWhitacre 420 Vinewood Lane N. Plymouth, MN 55441 Judith C. Starkey 16201 Holdridge Road Wayzata, MN 55391 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances DATE OF MEETING: July 21, 2003 Planning Commission recommended as follows: Approved per staff recommendation, including approval for an accessory storage building up to 200 s.f in area to be located generally southwest of the main church building. VOTE: 7 FOR 0 AGAINST Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Clly council - Monday, August 11, 2003; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. If you have questions, please call Planning Director Mike Gaffron at 952-249-4600. Date Application Received: 6-18^3 Date Application Considered as Complete: 6-18-03 60-Day Review Period Eipires: 8-17-03 To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Smith and Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator Mike Gaflron, Planning Director July 17,2003 • #03-2920 St, Edward the Confessor Episcopal Church, 865 North Femdale Road - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential, 2-acrc min. 4.28 acres (186,348 s.f.) Application Summary: The church structure was destroyed by fire in April, 2002. The foundation remains, and it is proposed to be re-used. During review of City files, staff found that no conditional use permit had ever been issued for church use, hence re-use of the site for church use will require a CUP approval. This review will also include a brief site plan review, although most aspects oftLe site are not changing. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of a Conditional Use Permit for continued church use of the property at 865 North Femdale Road. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Letter of Request and Description of Use C - Existing & Proposed Sur\'ey/Site Plan D - Proposed Plans & Elevations E - Property Owmers List F -Plat map G - Photos Pertinent Code Sections 1.Section 10.28, Subd. 3 /10.20 Subd. 3(B): Churches are a conditional use in the RR-IB District, subject to the following standards: “B. Churches. Churches including those related structures located on the same site which arc an integral part of the church proper, convents or homes’ for persons related to a religious function on the same site provided no building other than a residence shall be located within fifty feet of any lot line of an abutting lot in an "R" District.” 2. Section 10.61, Parking and Signage Provisions ..k i «>03*2920 July 17,2003 Page 2 Background St. Edwards was onginally granted Council approval for a building permit for a church in 1966, but the record indicates no formal CUP was ever granted for the church use. The church building was destroyed by fire in April 2002, and the congregation has decided to rebuild in the same location using the existing foundation. They have chosen HGA as the architect for the project, and preliminary building plans are included in the packet. The church was granted a CUP to permit the use of a day care/pre-school in July 1987, making use of lower level spaces in the church building. That use was most recently operated by a Montessori group, although the church apparently has not yet determined how that space will be used in the future. The church use is a permitted conditional use in the RR-IB district, and is regulated by certain defined perfoimance standards in the code, i.e. a minimum building setback of 50' from lot lines- minimum parking standards; signage standards; access location standards; etc. The existmgJ>roposed building location is centered on this 4+ acre property, more than plto. Parking for the church use is regulated in terms of minimum number of spaces and location The number of stalls is determined by the seating capacity of the main assembly room, at a rate of 1 stall per 4 seats. The mam worship area has seating designated for 143 persons, with an overflow area for an additional 40, totaling 183 persons: Main Assembly Room Seating Capacity: Required Pa.-king Stalls per Scat: Required Parking Stalls: Proposed Parking: 183 0.25 46 59 Stalls approximately 80 stalls, but the westerly parking wing is proposed to be converted to a bituminous turnaround and a meditation garden. Staff has not heard of any pasl parking issues wilh St. Edwards, and wc have no problem with the reduction in parking. southerly lot line. While technically the south lot line is a side lot line and not a rear lot line, parking 15 not proposed to be relocated and we are aware of no past issues with the parking on this site. Staff recommends approval ofUie continued use of this existing parking area with the revisions noted mmm r #03-2920 July 17,2003 Pages Signage. No new signage has been proposed. Photos of the existing signage for the church is attached in Exhibit G. The primar>' sign is located in the NE comer of the site, meeting the 10' property line setback requirement and posing no problems for traffic. In “R ” Districts, one nameplate sign for each use permitted by CUP is allowed with no more than 12 s.f. per surface. The existing permanent sign is approximately 50 s.f. in area of each side (staffhas not measured its dimensions so this is an approximation) and would require a variance if it were to be replaced. A second, smaller sign is along North Femdale at the driveway entrance, being a hanging banner type sign perhaps 2' x 4' or smaller per side, no more than 10-15 s.f. total of both sides. Because this is existing signage, staff recommends that continued use of the existing signs be approved. Any new signs would need to be submitted for review prior to issuance of a permit. Access Location. The existing church driveway accesses North Femdale Road approximately 220 south of the Femdale/Co. Rd. 6 intersection. This access point is appropriate and poses no problems for sight distance. GradingT)rainage. Re-use of the existing foundation and conversion of portions of the westerly parking lot will have little if any impact on the drainage of the site. No grade changes are proposed. New amenities to the site will include a bituminous walkxvay leading from the parking lot to the lower level, presumably for handicap access, and a new stainvay adjacent to the east wall of the building is proposed. A 24' x 40' bituminous or concrete ‘patio’ apron is proposed at the walkout level, meeting the 26' wetland setback. Lighting and .Landscaping. No lighting plan has been indicated on the submitted plans. City ordinances require that light sources not be visible at the lot lines. Utility & Building Code Issues. The site is scr\’ed with sewer from Plymouth, but has its own well. Because the new church building will be required to be fitted with a fire suppression sprinkler system, the church is advised to work with the City of Plymouth to obtain municipal water supply. Building Height. The proposed building has a peak height of 47' above the high side grade adjacent to the building. City code establishes by definition that height is measured to “the average height of the highest gable of a pitched oi hipped roof. The defined height of the proposed building using l!ic main roof gable running from end to end of the building is 28.8', meeting the required 30' limit. Impacts to Adiacent Properties. The only potentially affected pi'opcities are two homes located approximately 200' south of the site, which are significantly separated from the parking lot so as to minimize any real impacts; and a home to the west with significant separation and screening from the church buildings and parking areas. Staffhas not received any comments from neighboring property owners. • • » * .* T ■\ #03-2920 July 17,2003 Page 4 LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Lot AreaAVidlht RR-IB Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres)200* Actual 186,348 s.f. (4.28 acres)331* Bunding Setbacks; RR-IB Required Existing Proposed Front Street (East)50*179*179 ’ Rear (West)50*172*172* Left Side (South)50*126*126* Right Side Street (North)fso*168*168’ CUP Standards The Planning Commission may recommend and Ihe Council may grant a conditional use permit if the following findings are made: ^ L That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ompter and the purposes of the district in which the site is located and Comprehensive Municipal The proposed condjtioiwl use is in accordance with the Municipal Code as churches are listed as a conditional use in the R Districts. The proposed use is historical on the property and would be confined to the new structure that replaces the pre-existing structure. 2 . That the proposed location of the conditional use and the proposed conditions under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safeh' or welfare or materially injurious to propi rties or improvements in the vicinity; and. The proposed conditional use would not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare. The da> care 61^6^198^^^ ^ ^ building w as constructed in 1966, and additionally for ZoJdngcLpter''''^ co/iJmona/ use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the The use will not conflict with other provisions of the Zoning Chapter. Replacement of existing nonconforming parking areas or signage would be required to be reviewed at the time of such replacement. A <;03-2920 July 17,2003 P«(cS Issues for Consideratiou 1. 2. The church use will continue as it has for the past 30-plus years at this location. Only minor site plan changes are proposed. Only minimal grade changes are proposed. The footprint of the church will remain a.« before. The existing parking and hardsurface areas will remain at the same square footage or be slightly reduced overall. There is no apparent specific need for new stonnwater management facilities. 3.The church should be advised to contact the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to determine if an erosion control permit will be required. 4. 5. Signage is not proposed to change at this time. Docs Planning Commission have any other issues or concerns with this application? Staff Recommcudation Staff recommends approval of a conditional use permit for continued church use of the site at 865 North Femdale Road. Planning Commission should provide direction on any issues which should be addressed relative to the use and the site plan. Hay-{a-23C3 I2:47im Froi-CiTY OF CiONO ♦tS224t4ll|T-S43 P.002/00S MIS 4 A|q>llcailott « d>3 '‘3 9::} o Date Received ^ -/.C- -<o-=^ Amouat Paid CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND DSE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION i / i Site Address tVoirH^ jZa , Ot~c^nc> Type of Application to.be Filed C^A ,'hy^al /Mg. H,g>»Yyi.T~ Property IdenUfication Number (P.I.P-) c2 Phone (home).APPLICA^ ^ _ ________ Kame.^r -^ciLoarA tj\c vonQ^yt- iPhone ft ^ Citv^ I . ,/rur Zip / ~ OVVTiER (if differeot than applicant) Name Address City Phone (home). Phone (work)_; i Date Property Acquired . \QLL Zip. I (do) (do not)/also own the adjacent parcels of land.(month^ear) FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERbHTS • _____S 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application _____ $250.00 Residential Accessory Use -______$250.00 histituiional (church, school, etc.) _____$250.00 Guest House/Gucst Apartments _____ $250.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _____$325.00 Conunercial/Industrial Use $250.00 Land Alteration ____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain _____ Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75* of lakesbore PRD/PiD - see Fee Schedule $150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) _ After-tlie-Fact Fee - Double Currem Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS ______ $275.01) Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees> _____$300.00 Vacation ' _____$250.00 Easement Vacation _____SI00.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _____$350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _____ 5375.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____$100.00 Appeals _____ Other ♦ sec Fee Schedule #292 U>r2l*200} I2:47|m 7rM-CITV OF OMNO ♦IS224MSII T-$4) F 003/00S MIS required submittals 1. 2. 3. Completed Application Fonn. Describe request in detail. 4. 5. 6. Certifi^ Propeily Ovimeis List of ownen within 3sty ia -i. . -• • must obtain this list labels and man from »j P*** *™P (you - A-603, Government Centi, 348-3270^ Hennepin County Department of Fin^e, i^mmation*^ * ^censed surveyor) . refer to handout for survey 7. infoimation. ------------- f ict nf til. _______ . 8. 9. ------„----... «n.>wtWll ------------- pnweny. Tbit *“ — As an addendum to diis application, please attach a senarat^ r.* > persons you wish notified of this appUcatioa *eparate list of any other 3’Or ^ FOR "^iSSuCTIO^^ ^^^LER) appUcStn i> not waplaTtf lhe'XvriSoSia^h»'Z!l'S!l^-.f^^^ tantmbar tbai j*ur -------------------------------------- Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ,r;r, •; r““«‘ and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this aonlicatitl payment) supplied is true and correct to the best of hisdier knowledge. ’ ^ the infoimation TORE V Date OWNER'S SIGNATURE cniiy onto the blTcuy °" **!*”” “'^nzed reasonable membere for puiposes of inveMipation and verificalinn of “* Owner’s signature Applicant must have iTlI submiiuls int^fhe^^City §t~ AJitn • •• hrtd onihc O^d Monday of!Srk^*i.** Planning Coia&on Meemg. **J*i*^‘J xMcdngs of ihe Planning Commiukm and Comril if^ Applicana mm be prcKM stall scheduled inectiag, please nuke ariaogeiaenta to have ■>> ^ ^ *” *Ppl»cam h uiuble to attend a Building A Zoning Office of Ail change t^Ae •*“* “ P*" P**** --iW** Ac j^c.ae^ A4<V p,7 e6r/■«<., M: CIt • * #'%J j ! ^ — ■" • « Please also notify: Rev. Judy Hoover, Rector, St. Edward the Confessor Episcopal Church, 125 E Wayzata Boulevard, Wayzata, MN 55391. Lynne WWtacre, Senior Warden, 420 Vinewood Lane N., Plymouth, MN 55441 ^29 20 APPLICATION FOR REBUILDING OF ST. EDWARD THE CONFESOR EPISCOPAL CHURCH The congregation of St, Edward’s Episcopal Church has decided to rebuild our church on our existing site. The previous building was destroyed by fire on April 14,2002. It has been determined that the existing foundation, including the basement (undercroft) is usable. We have insurance money and not much more, therefore we anticipate rebuilding using the existing footprint. The architect we have chosen is HGA of Minneapolis, and the contractor will be Langer Construction of St. Paul. The new building will have some similarities to the old, but will not be A frame. Using a more standard roofline allows us to make more use of the entire footprint on the upper (main) level. Dark wood will be replaced by light, and many more windows will exist for natural light. The old building had only narthex (foyer), nave or sanctuary (room with the pews) and sacristy (preparation room) on the main level. The new configuration will allow for ofilces near the front door as well as restrooms and a coffee bar. Deficiencies in the old building will be addressed; The main floor will have more than one egress. Lower level doors will open out, not in. Handicapped ramp will be added, of course, along with handicapped restrooms on both levels and an elevator. If it is determined that we want a frill kitchen, stainless steel appliances will be purchased according to current health codes. Adequate lighting and electrical service will be available throughout. We are investigating the possibility of geothermal heating, although this has to be researched more thoroughly due to cost and whether it will work on our lot. We anticipate a simple, but attractive and functional building which will meet our needs more lully than the old and allow, also, more room to host community needs such as Boy Scouts, counseling groups, exercise class, etc. We rented to a number of pre or after school groups in the past. Most recently was a Montessori preschool. We have not determined, yet, who or what will fit our new space on an everyday basis. However, we will be looking for a tenant. We have a congregation of about 150 (including children). And w hile our space in Wayzata Community Church is wonderful, and they have been very’ accommodating, we are sure it is time to once again be in our own home. , • it -. , ^ ^ /C? /O' O a.-I .V P- '.A- •‘i. r r. L-* “ V Site Plan Mu*a^.miai«<HM St. Edward the Confessor Episcnnai Church ■;■•’29 20 ft. lAiBatoiiiDlil 1 mi r ^ W h " :*'t v4 -•'i- C-1 e W •i 9LJ-LJ J.i O fOl ^7r '<j>Main Level Plan Diagram St. Edward the Confessor Episcopal Church A It. •iiMiai I ca ■r'-' ^ ^ 0 4 • Lowtf Ltvel Plan Diagram Jf St. Edward the Confessor Episcopal Church /O <> • • ••*, j 1 . i "---- r V) oil T 't jf‘^^ J ^ T ■fr'W - *4y ^ 1 ■ '•.1 §4', jtSL mwm- ^ i'.'^L lif.v ’.,',,, :p( S* A * 1-. i • • sssSi^'•Mim ..nv..t * •V ^•. I ’' '^14:'^’^ ^ A s I BrtcrtoMZioyaM 4'^^ V | :. Edward the Confessor Episcopyphui^^ ^Lf/ fcs^ft ■ <k ■"■' ' “ •’'• -■'■.itA^..,.' & *•. V ’ I? ■ . ::-5^>?_V ' i Pl« f^ti!0-siai(i;< fiM •• .-.t: •I -^4 O 05 05 =fe oa ^ t WfB \ 4^ ♦ . ■ * >«Mk* .*«•;'!•• : •} «.A I I I \ \ '--U «<W' ©LH ••vV' -/-' -• i .■ :J •J •■ ■f-^r-;f V.. ExUuior Elovatiqn St. Edward the Confessor Episcopal Church t^. ktm»i 0^ I 1 .iS=iTl^— C'prv-^w'.^S-^ r.u%t.*^>\r*«ifc T',** MMortM»- f', ^ • .».“••• ». ». ■*.^ • •! ..<, i»»^ r # U^fiiry a• '.V^ s'iV' 'i ‘T \'!• * «■ •V •>. ^ \ / :.' • • ■'■ <• t f , \ QP • • . ■ • *• • 1 —, . . . .•1 1.____>»HI —< ri ffi r^c\ © I f=| y Bulking Section B B St. Edward the Confessor Episcopal Church r::) r;^ \ X • ^ (^ I t *'lj It f' I ^Tilfj 'f ,-i ■v/> >e >./' ;©>-V: ■SS>t N: A//)^hry '/. X \ ••‘‘e i \' ©; ©. 6 '"to 'V « ».a *Si!* ^ / ©!\ -©►ittX-- ^#t out Of c0^k^ COUO K CAt 1*4 OOIKM »Of/ um%m It • IM«»« «iCU«i»05 riACCCO U iH^lftOiCAHCt MAT , / (nM» —lOlV- J ^ _ I I0i>0« It* I07«'* tn*wj y «A. .v<‘'' ^ 1 -^ -- ♦ " " _ N'* >: V \ ©/ •>•. ♦' •ctlatci ruccco rr CNViROSatffCf mat 2003 y X ^n/ \ y / / / .* ^ . , f *'/if* A ^4 '// t'T-/ / f/ / T' ' / ' y- '\i CHURCH BAS£UCNT A rOUNOAnCN (npc dam AGCO) lOTCsr r»x • 1020 44 rr ^ S "c?:V /. .V.‘ • \ t 5 \ S ■M X >+ » ^:sn.aSrXk^ n “V s i BCNCHMAPK - TOP NUT HRC HYOAANT 103291 LEGEND OCNOm KNCMIAM 0 ecMin mAirct cofinai pont b 00«0m CAST MON MOfbMOiT C3 ocMtit POUNO moNcurr aon K OCMOtU ONUIO MIC 4- OCNOUt ACtAA 40M<0 OCMOS Ml MM. 69 OCNOnS 1NM (0 DCNOm SIONII nil CAtO* iasn ■ OtNOlU OM MiT 0 0CMO1I1 fiAAco M acnoN (T ofNoat CAS %«ivi ^ ocMOfcs cAt «noi A olftotis CAA axr 0 OCNOaS CASOtitf MAM o' OCNONf «CU/W9«1CN ACU ^ OCNOflS NAIUI Vfna (p 0CM>m NA1V umm <1^ OfMOflS me HTVUMt a ocNoat CAS Ml iw Q Duoas NAIDI CUM tttp MNOTlt gjNC»TQ| aOMMUJI f| OCNOfU >0N/Past a ocMons nuAND/ujAAo rott CZ otNcits nw»« aooN cuvAncN *-oi' oiMotn S10NM a«M —uf- ocNom UMUAT area — c~ 0CAO1CS OaJMAO CUCT1AC — •- OCMOaS UNOCAGAOUM) CLtCIMC CAM- ocNoas mcA oanc —•— 0CNO1U aam me fVKt — ■ oeNovs HAM4AC (tAmom uajTV) OOfOTU NAMONOU (UMMOm imUTY) 00«om UMtCAOAOUHO VA^T (UNRNOm urun) oiNoas CliciiAc ic«M ooioai CUCtlAC AONDI AOU OCNOaS OUT AMO40N OCNOaS OUT AOC ooloas caenne ha *« nqu oiNoas fuctaa maimou ocNoas oec^ laaA OCNOat UCHf ACIC ODOTS aUAMAC NAAMOtl MNoas atiMoc Atoctui CNMoas ouiQOOA auMoa OCMOaS CATV NAMIOU ocNoat CATV nontM. ocNoae fAtcLua om OCMOaS UMTAAT MAHMOa Mjwoas samtany ciCAMJur ocM>ae apiic rao ucnt OCNOat LAI S^AHOM oeMoat Moocoue aa oiNoas coMutAous ma oiMoas naaaoi M»«oas ooNoaa suvAa ocioai o*Tf»CAO auAMM 0CM>a% UNOOtCAOAM aUM«N( ocM>ae CAS unc # ocNoas NAtia ua ■ OIMat CAM TV oeNoas CMA«am ruac ocNoas NDoo race .L«AaA ttvt KA ott mam UTIUTY PHONE 1 oqmcmi 4N-ll4<^lJ icn oewT 2 iMKCiiaCO MMRCNIOO •M*n2>aMa 9cn comamcaxm iN-m-Mio cm cr OMCNO •u>t«»'.aoo OTY or MNNA1M TtA-MP-MlO aAa-«T2»A4t« COMCAIT «i *fu$i'kaji t «A)Mj :(•:<}. i.ArilJ hi:rv mjLs- • MO nac moMMAiioM MAS POOMOW fca ms iumcy iwf «Mif oou not pumc «t io »ioa au CASOCuTt or mcoao t IK BkvCMAT scavNC IK pavorn io «€ aUf OKtSUt K nqrikcst eomtt9 or IK tutJict kopoity by about i s*. ik nqbihaut pBOPfUTY ccfNaa a A PR KT ■! SAB OBnaaAT. * ec-« ^ w •< »"«» * *** *^ S •Vii^'Sxuy ja* y _____ -______..ifc.w*. mmim ft aami CM PUM KBf lOCABO tiaBBI KvaCAliY ON IK QMUND BUBMC 1C «idCY OB PBBM BCCGBOS PBOKKD BY*«••»€ KOMM cr IX MdCt WT MM waMMuM* M* W1W10 orw 00 aot ** waMrm •> muon •»» h moowuk m w m umi cr mmmm mm* «nui.T or•twem t» » momc **m ^ *m«t jj" amcMicK mow« »» mi hi nwii •u SS^Som«m mmia m iMMtiir » mmm* eowiv rai ca mm m • «wm ami » coMiwct« iJ!!?!?mvZmW *7HBBM MDUMMI Ml MIMO MUMMCS M eawn «■* W M SMiOMH CMMWCWK »-»Al » M» OMl MMMMB «M MOMM #» •€ OMIt «M IT M* U«l«i • »M •MWl is;!:::vrv /!,/ ~ •\i t ' ' i •*'/ / aXlTH UK see 2S. T IIIL A 23 —------' I ........................ ✓ / v;:; : i I ■•a CA« (tp) 2^ t IISj II ts •«/ -lAiA— — •MAMI ,<c* icsjta (iol I tN.AMl sc COM or M •llTlMfiM I MimiAJ IiuT* t4»n I -J I MM* MM All ;.•; PIA m) I ••. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (PBOMOCO BY OICRT) that PABT or OOVCBMCNT LOT 3. SCCH0M TaOiTT-nve <2S). TOmiaP ONC NUNOBCO CCNltCN (Ita). RANOC rioirY-THia (23X i«mc south or a uk ocsokco AS KCAMNC At AC SOUTHCLST COBNCA OT SA« SCCnON 23; ACNCC NORAt A lC n G AC ACST UNC TKACOr 1790 rUT: THCKC CASTdCV OCOCCTMC TO AC AOtT S3Y9’ A 0«TANCC OT 23W 7 rtCT. ACNCC ocnicnMc TO A*c ptCMT along a r cuavt (oclta ANGU 20*31 tangcnt castancc mo reen a o^tancc 00 l«:t 2 mi; TKNCC SOUACASrCfav Ta *«GCNT to SAo cm A oisTANa or 232 tut ; ACNa ocacctk TO INC ten along a r so’ curve (oaiA ancu u*3a* AO TANGCNT OiSTANa 4f0 S rCIT) A DiSTAsa or t7S 9 rtlT. ACNCC SOUtHCASaJlLY TAMONT to Sa © LASr-OCSOKCO CUINC A OtSTANCe OT 930 S rUT; TK n CC OCniCANC TO TK LCFT ALONG A 3 30* CUPVC (octTA ANGLi 3430* ANo tanccnt oiYTANa 9na rccT) to its MTiasccroi «i*n cast uk or sao sccaon 2I AK Acac CMOMC CICCPT AlAT PART TKRCOr LTViC MIST CT A UK UURN N0B1N PCRPOOCUAA TO TK SOuAi UNf CT SA jO COKYMCHT lot 3 Kou A 30IIT 1NOC0N 0I9’*AT 4TJ rai kst or ik soutnca * t or sa © COlCaNMCNT lot X ACCCMOv^. «> TK u 1 GOVCHM iC n T sua>CY iKPfor. pcllcang ant pamt or pgrtkm or ANT STRdT OR AUIT AOJAaN? TO Sa Q PRCMSS KRCToroK vACAao or to k vACAao SUBJECT TO C a SC mCNT TAKri fOR CO. RO a. AS SCT rORTN UNOCR OOC NOl 2I2tS^ HiO 349130A GRAPHIC SCALE • • M ( P PBT ) I ma • aa a ST. EDWARD THE CONFESSOR EPISCOPAL CHURCH MS FERNUALE MX H onOTKX MN SJ9I I KAOrr CTTtrr iMAt fMS VAKr MlM« on AtNONT NAS ANir«AC0 PT W( ON UMCC» w* wet A mO tXAT ' AM * OmT UCCNUO IM»0 *>.NVt*ON UMMN tH» lA*r% r>4 itAfi Of o*a WQi.. Ate MX .ooxs .AStSSfiS. ^ UVAUJHS »-OA>Oj •R* ICGN. OOC SCALf. I*- X* OATC 07-03-03 OPAMN PLY CHlCYtO- KC PPOi NO; 200Xta.2 fu wiai. BOUNDARY/ TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY 200301S2 H Li £ 46350irs?9>*-—... '•'- *•••- ** —......----V:*--::::vV/^^^^^^^ y *•••••• . Site PlanSt. Edward the Confessor Episcopal Church Sl.K • KXSJl«t frt • AI 2« M) w/c 2_Z Office Wolk -1 I. »\ Office 126 3f 96*8 ’ Office 126 sf -Qatheflng/- ----------137: Ove^jw rn r ^ r|n rn H H M M X >A M K*_M- MA-X-*A- >1 H M H »•< X H M X M • m m m« • • • i..i..s..;..i..i f JIT III TT TT1 ~iri % ^nrTT)nf~]n(nnr¥ n^i m i I ■ ■ ij ■ IT^I f ■ I in IM II r m Sound/ Elec 271 si------- ► b k J k J k J k ^ei Recep 12psf k. . •. • J A. Main Level Plan Diagram >fship*^~=----- 226681 riTTTtrf? )i rm nrTTj¥ ■ TI ■ nnrinnnnfif nri^Tin nfT~¥~n~T 111 r ¥ i i .L-TTOcqc aes I ■Til ixm II III 111 11114-JM Sacristy 322 sf ..J 8^8 ss 96-8 “ #i..j. O Education 3 Education 328 sf 1 J28sf Mech 322 sf V i • i i ■ ____________h__ V-V f vw f< f'l r 1 r 1 J ___C, i > ^ Multipurpose L - •j»-Education -----■- 1 h 900 sf —Education 430sf ‘ Multipurpose Room 1560 sf iAriAi= Education 328 sf B. Lower Level Plan Diagram Multi- ■ P Purpose Education I Storage 328 sf I 238 lAJ nJ ) 4 8 > 4 nA-«ocaajui<M^-<M>ras9S Floor Plan Diagrams St. Edward the Confessor Episcopal Church m. r- ■ ; ■■•.• JJ .v^ . —• / r'i .»• •- X \ - 4^-*: ■ * ^• v;■j-A' i. .. 'i ‘. -si. -. '.ii<D •;.' +4r-o*+4r-o' <D .* 4"' * ^ '* —V j . . ' .‘.v^ n. - / i.':;'5v''n- V V % X—] i’>y-. .9BBB BBBB BBHB EIBB 3ESM tKHB. S3BBE) EUa fiBK^ . -i j Main Level ; 1 t i! !! i I:;I ! 1 j :!1 ‘ aBBB aRKr* I a^ra ai BSL':^ S!S23Z CKtS-b k]SSQ TSUfl i;mbb TBHK • •:Kf;p-3 '.laBS RHBtt •iriKMiii >?E!i£JB 1B2B unt,m ^ES5f CJ^Ra £i:9IK *3BBB SEBCI rcsB BS3BE (3C1C GB02 kiRBB S!? £K!9IK I 1*^ I I 'levation B. South Elevation Material Keynotes: (T) Vertical Wood Board and Batten Siding (2) Asphalt Shingles CJ) Glass/ Windows ([J) Brick/ Masonry 4 8 Building Elevations St. Edward the Confessor Episcopal Church Ir u -I ■ ■ ■ > H, ■ . I ■ -''j rK'V ■• -i*'.*'.: > ''A?;'. > nil -'t^f ievation +4r-o* 4* ^ ^i^. n LEE Laa B. North Elevation <D I ,aEiTO aEi^aiHL^flB ■ USEB rssR IIHS EPKiSf Be 1 1*1 w ifg' "SiP'ra vt\r| .■' - V •»/? i . • • • ■■-%^/! m * *■ V : '■•..■?• i • ' • **„ ' <1 ^«aaiBaik^ 7*BH KfcieaU!;^ ■ BIB k^^^BB ^BEtl ELJBB r^L^BB BBBB EJ^BB ^BBE Kfcl9B £{!B.e;; '2m9.C i''r:imm~ B80B SuBB eriBi BBSS Qu^:a £&B^ L’:£IE3: L-.a£y (LBKd T ' I ^ ■•>! Tis<—<DVr.l i ,-l BBBB F7T1 BBBB i-i SGBBncaa Ll. ^ «REa 1 I ■ n J' E/l F 1(1 I 8 I'JUIVC Material Keynotes: CD Vertical wood Board and Batten Siding CD Asphalt Shingles CD Gl®^^ Windows C!D Brick/ Masonry Building Elevations St. Edward the Confessor Epjscopal Church L'J; J^A'aflW ■(> I ifci I .- \- ^ 1 ' i ^ ' ■'’!=!' : ■ * • : 1 ; . ; ■ ' • * . * . ' • • ■ '!!; . ' » ' i ^■:i:i! »4 ♦ . i ‘ ‘ >•r UUNDAiL.0/11/20)3 31 25111123410001 PROP ADDR 300 SIX111AVG N OWNER NAMG DOUOI-AS DAYTON ETAL TAXPAYER DOUGLAS J DAYTON NAME/ADDR 300 CTO RD NO 6 WAYZATAMN 5539I 3t 2511823440011 PROP ADDR 205 MOLUNDERRD OWNER NAME D A DURNS A C M BURNS TAXPAYER DAVID A BURNS NAME/ADDR 205 HOLLANDER RD WAYZATAMN 55391 40 3011822330007 PROP ADDR 19030 CO RD NO 6 OWNER NAME M BSTIMPSON 1983 TR ETAL TAXPAYER C M JR 1983 TRUST NAME/ADDR CfO WAYCROSS INC P 0 00X5628 MPLSMN 55440 40 3111822220041 PROP ADDR 1250 FERNDAI.E RD OWNER NAME M J EDWAKUS A D LEDWARDS TAXPAYER MATTHEW J EDWARDS NAME/ADDR 1250 FERNDALE RD PLYMOUTH MN 55447 40 3111822220044 PROP ADDR 1280 FERNDALE RD OWNER NAME 11J A G M LAZNIARZ TA3CPAYER HENRY J A CfNA M LAZNIARZ NAME/ADDR t041 1 CEDAR LAKE RD 1/204 MINNETONKA MN 55305 • •• • 3K 361 U231 10026 PROP ADDR 763 FERNOAUIRDN OWNER NAME S D WIFLE A D L WIELE TAXPAYER SCOrrDADEBORRALWtELE NAME/ADDR 763 FERNDALE RD N WAYZATAMN 55391 % ^ ? Ill-NNLIMN COUNTY V INFORMATION SYSTEM I'RUPlilU Y OWNliRS LIST PACE: I. 38 2511823440002 PROP ADDR 865 FERNDALE RDN OWNI-R NAME ST EDWARDS EPISCL CH TAXPAYER ST EDWARD THE CONFESSOR NAME/ADDR EPBCOPOL CHURCH 865FERN’>ALERDN WAYZATAMN 55391 38 2511823440012 PROP ADDR 99 SIXTH AVF.N OWNER NAME D L BRISCOE A P L BRISCOE TAXPAYER DLBRISCOEAPLBRISCOE NAME/ADDR 99 6TH AVE N WAYZATAMN 55391 40 3911822330008 PROP ADDR 40 ADDRESS UNASSICNED OWNER NAME RUTHOELWELL TA3CPAYER RUTH O ELWELL NAME/ADDR 5365 ASHCROFT RD MINNETONICAMN 55345 40 3111822220042 PROP ADDR 1260 FERNDALE RD OWNER NAME IIJ A O M LAZNIARZ TAXPAYER HENRY J A CWA M LAZNIARZ NAM17ADDR 1041 1 CEDAR LAKE RD #204 MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 36II823II00I3 PROP ADDR 781 FERNDALE RDN OWNER NAME KEVIN A SHARON TAPANI TAXPAYER KEVIN A SHARON TAPANI NAME/ADDR 78! FERNDALE RD ORONOMN 55391 38 3611823110027 PROP ADDR SOI FERNDALE RDN 03VNERNAME OAADLNELSON TAXPAYER OREO A A DIANE L NELSON N AME/ADDR *01 FERNDALE RD N '■:i 'U WAYZATAMN 55391 38 2511823440003 PROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED OWNER NAME DOUGLAS J DAYTON TAXPAYER DOUGLAS J DAYTON NAME/ADDR 300 CORD NO 6 WAYZATAMN 55391 38 2511823440013 I'ROPADDR 215 HOLUNDERRD 3. VNER NAME W B MCKEEVER A M11MCKEEVER TAXPAYER WAYNE D A MARY H MCKEEVER NAME/ADDR 215 HOLLANDER RD WAYZATAMN 55391 40 3111822220005 PROP ADDR 1200 FERNDALE RD OWNER NAME BRETT 0 ALBER/LORRAOALBER TAXPAYER BRETT O ALBER NAME/ADDR 1200 FERNDALE RD PLYMOUTH MN 55447 •■•"I 40 3111822220043 PROP ADDR 1270 FERNDALE RO OWNER NAME MATTHEW J A USA R STEFFEN TAXPAYER MATTHEWJALISARSTEFFEN NAME/ADDR !270 FERNDALE RO PLYMOUTH MN 55447 38 36118231 1Cj 14 PROP ADDR 765 FERNDALE RD N OWNER NAME URSULA E GALANOS TAXPAYER URSULA E GALANOS NAME/ADDR 765 FERNDALE RD N WAYZATAMN 55391 J 38 3611823110028 PROP ADDR 755 FERNDALE RD N OWNERNAME JEANNEM MITHUN TAXPAYER JEANNEMimUN NAME/ADDR 755 FERNDALE RO N WAYZATAMN 55391 # ''' • tV;.; ; V S.-- •.^l■ •/: v! ,••'• %• ' ■ ■'"♦t - -4 *• 'f-t . ■ -. * RUN DATE: 6^11/2003 HBNNCPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERT Y OWNERS LIST r.^S^TSirTBONT™ BBCO^S DATE BY \ - ... _ ‘-VA * if- r* • I'*' ,1 . >4 Jh .Jilt' PAGE: 2 toa^oi mate L nirr..'. v » • ■ »7»/- . K-'-: A'?‘If ’"?; ;}-f’'?*ir '.’v r" ;.:C . .Vv;.ijr-'. ••' ;-’'i./--4 ‘-■=?.*’• :■'.•*'• •• ..r*"' •. r * i* ^l!'v V ' s .t.'t^v V, ... ».n. ' • •,*•• •. J ^ t'r ' ^* 1 • iV?^ ;• - ; •• y ..•' ^■j ■ u- ;H»- j r.” i BB^EpIQBI . •• t*‘ . . \ ;,S w • "w, • ^ rv.-i-v. A ( If»i:/ •'.y ■') t f % ■o.' » ' .«A ■ ^ . \ m '^ . V,.. , Lfrj^. I JL«I .1 A • I •,^zjrr.ti^y J '‘*r^ ^ “V' * ' \< i- i' SceBI • V. A-. >. j - *•*.»-; •;• ■_ i;r- Wi m i ^U^i ''^^rSr^ :< ■» .* -vry;://V i V</J .aSm» • A 'wh-'' ■■•'•^* ^ ’’■■i '^* * ^•^'■' ' .’ *• * • *-’•*•- ' ^ ‘ ^■ IT* '*>' ' ** ’ * * '■'•/* “•"'-•w - P '* •*? rv» • i It. •• ^•i4/ .r . • ’ * ' * • ‘ te; - •'.• ^ ...•* V *. ffl • V /. ^ > a'c •. - V ^ *'■ • ' •^■' • ’. Vui-4i 1‘ . -i • -.'-.A -‘••^'' . * T ». .. V . * '■ •' \ 1•^ (I ;- ' . ,7 i- • a B' ' ^ 7>^- .TTv^'-Sj? ■'. . > » », r‘<. ^ '•^i> # • ^■C:l !Lv ' A. : - m ^4., V- ' -^v,v * ,j .— »v »> . •* * iV . '7 fW . iI ■ » • •- * ^-v :i ■■ ■ • , .-^ ';»A‘ ■']•*' C * ‘ T ' * V* A f .' V ... •. >r ..•,i.'-. •. • • • • > V ’-. ■■! ‘ •j * . '’^ }. '?** •. '••*»■’. #i;' .• • ■ ■ • /V ■ .t-Af '.Vi' . *1 , •»'*.i ^ *- '• '• 'V^ -'*• ' ‘■•' • ■.. .■♦•V ■ • ■••1 •• ■■• #> • ^ • V }■ . ■ r ’4- •> j ••< .• Vi.* A^•* O' .. • •♦;y tt** ^ 4 • , Vi.* • -7! ''V V.^*4 V.-A" }*'')■■ ' .*•*• ’ '* •*. \a-4 ;•^A'•V ;v,. ;.\ . . •■•■•?;>fVv.-. feL: AUG 1 1 2003 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CllYOHORONO DATE: June 23,2003 ITEM NO.: Cj Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Public Services Director’s Report Item Description: Accept Quotations for Navarre County Road 19 Sidewalk As part of the recently completed Navarre Playground Improvements project, a Municipal State Aid project for the installation of a concrete sidewalk along the west side of Shadywood Road from Lyric Avenue north to Crystal Avenue was planned. This sidewalk will provide for safer pedestrian access to Navarre Park and the commercial area and will eventually connect to the future Dakota Rail trail. This section of Shadywood Road currently has a narrow shoulder area for pedestrian use, and during the winter months the available shoulder area for pedestrians is even further restricted. The original concept was for the construction of a sidewalk between Lyric Avenue and Ciystal Place. The first block of sidewalk between Lyric and Livingston Avenues will be easy to construct. However, construction of the second block of sidewalk between Livingston Avenue and Crystal Place will be very expensive to construct and will require the installation of a 7 to 10 foot high retaining wall because of the steep bank in this area. We have had preliminary’ discussions with the property owners in this block, and they are very concerned about the loss of large mature trees necessary to construct a retaining wall. There may be options for different wall types to minimize the loss of trees, but these options are very expensive and will result in a six-figure cost for this block of sidewalk. Based on the verv property' owner concerns and the high cost for the second block of sidewalk, we have only prepared plans and specifications for the first block of sidewalk between Lyric and Livingston Avenue. Also, with the Old Crystal Bay Road and Willow Drive/CR 6 intersection State Aid projects there will not enough funds available now to complete the sidewalk between Livingston Avenue and Cry stal Place. The deadline for the receipt is quotations is 11:00 a.m. on Monday. August 11"*. We will have a recommendation on the acceptance of quotations for the Council meeting. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: A recommendation on the acceptance of quotations will be provided at the Council meeting V I f li iv ., . 960 •« ii ------------------------------------------s 5 ^ 1 5• II 1------ i i ** 1 t___i /■ - OBS1MO ojwvC LANC ^I g 1 * ' 1 0 1 2 :----------------;----------------- ------------:----------------- m___1 fit _ ^ ^ 1t 9 w ________! a ii n 970 if ‘f ti :! iS i3 ii 1*00 C6.01 iiirti itAii iifcn nii iliiiitii 1 dikkii^ r/M......_____ AUG 1 1 2003 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CU Y Ot OHONO DATE; August 1 1,2003 ITEM NO.:JO Department Approval: Name Gregor> A Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Public Services Director’s Report Item Description: Willow Drivc/CR 6 Imcrsection l-casibility Study Introduction A feasibility study has been completed, by Bonestroo Engineers, for the Willow Drive/CR 6 intersection and is being presented for Council review and consideration. This is a hazardous intersection that has a history of multiple personal injury accidents and several traffic fatalities over the past several years. The accident crash and .severity rates, and crash density rates are significantly above the metro and statewide averages for a Rural Two-Way Stop Intersection. About 2/3 of the accidents at the intersection are right angle crashes in which vehicles on Willow Drive that are crossing the intersection are hit by high speed through tralllc vehicles on County Road 6. These accidents tend to be severe with a high incidence of personal injuries and fatalities. Accident Rates Crash Rate (per million vehicles) 1.71 Metro Average 0.30 Statewide Average 0.40 Severity Rate (per million vehicles) 5.14 Metro Average 0.60 Statewide Average 1.00 Crash Density (# accidents per year) 6.0 Metro Average 1.1 Statewide Average 0.7 This intersection is hazardous for several reasons which include the high speed and heavy tratTic volume on County Road 6, substandard bypass lanes on the county highway, limited sight distance at the Willow Drive slop signs, and significant queuing of traffic at the stop signs on Willow Drive. This tralTic queuing, at the stop signs, is hazardous because motorists tend to take chances and pull out into the high speed traffic on County Road 6 with less than adequate openings. Page 1 of 3 .» 1 I The intersection Level of Service is less than desirable during the peak traffic hours for the Willow Drive approaches. Level of Service is an industry’ standard measurement of the functioning of roads and intersections and is designated by a letter grade with A being the best and F the worst designation. During the peak traffic hours, the Willow Drive approaches are functioning at a D Level of Service. This designation is based on the length of the traffic queues as during peak hours about 10 vehicles are slacked at each stop sign. Intersectioii Improvements Intersection Construction Improvements and Traffic Sienal Installation The feasibility study contains several recommendations for construction improvements to the intersection which include replacement of the hazardous bypass lanes on County Road 6 with safer left turn lanes; the provision of left turn, through traffic, and right turn lanes at all four intersection approaches; and lowering the grade several feet on the east County Road 6 approach to improve the sight distance for Willow Drive traffic. A future traffic signal is also recommended for this intersection, and there have been several traffic counts at this intersection to conduct a traffic signal warrant nnalvsis. There are slightly different numbers between the Bonestroo Engineer's trafTic counts and Hennepin County's traffic counts. Depending on which traffic counts are used, it appears that the int ^section currently either meets signal warrants or is very close to meeting the warrants. However, the installation of a traffic signal is not recommended without completion of the intersection construction improvements. The estimated feasibility study cost for the completion of intersection improvements and traffic signal installation is $825,000. These improvements are eligible for Municipal State Aid funding by the City of Orono. There are also ongoing discussions between the Cities of Orono and Medina regarding the potential for funding a portion of these costs by a developer who is proposing a new 21-lot subdivision adjacent to Willow Drive in the City Medina. Based on our preliminary discussions with Hennepin County Transportation Staff, it appears that this intersection ranks low- on the County ’s priority ranking for capital improvement projects. The staff recommendation is for Council approval of this feasibility study and authorization for City statTto present this study to the Hennepin County Transp>ortation Department for review and to begin discussions for a future intersection reconstruction and traffic signal project. Four Wav Stop Condition Several intersection improvements are discussed in the feasibility study for possible implementation. At this time, the feasibility study recommendation is that Four-Way stop signs be installed at the intersection. In order for traffic control devices such as stop signs or traffic signals to be installed certain traffic level conditions, or Warrants, need to be satisfied. Satisfaction of these Warrants Page 2 of 3 jfe K.m». .rii.ifc. prevents inappropriate trafTic control devices from being installed. The Willow Drive/County Road 6 intersection currently meets the Warrants for the installation of Four-Way stop signs. The installa ’vv. '•‘‘a Four-Way stop condition should reduce the number and severity of right angle crashes : .itersection. fhe one disadvantage of stop signs on County Road 6 is a possible increase in the number of rear end collisions. However, these types of crashes tend to less severe than right angle crashes and normally result in fewer injuries. The amount of traffic queuing on County Road 6, during the peak hour conditions, was modeled for a Four-Way stop condition and is about 10 cars which is a B Level of Service. The traffic queuing Level of Service on the Willow Drive approaches improves from a D level to an A level under the Four-Way stop condition. Four-Way stop signs could be installed now without completing any other intersection improvements and should result in a substantial increase in the safety of the intersection. The City staff recommendation is for Council approval of the installation of Four-W'ay Stop Signs at this intersection and to authorize City staff to work with the Hennepin County Transportation Department on the installation of Four-Way Stop Signs at the W'illow Drive/County Road 6 intersection as soon as possible. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to accept the Willow Drive/CR 6 Intersection Feasibility Study and to authorize City staff to present the study to the Hennepin County Transportation department for review and to begin discussions on a future intersection reconstruction arid traffic signal project. Motion to approve the recommendation in the Willow Drive/CR 6 Intersection Feasibility Study for the installation of Four-Way Stop Signs at this intersection and to authorize City staff to work with the Hennepin County Transportation Department on the installation of Four-Way Stop Signs at the W'illow Drive/County Road 6 intersection as soon as possible. Page 3 of 3 Bonestroo Rosene Ander11k - St. Paul, MN (6S1)636-1311 COUNTY STATE-AID HIGHWAY 6 AND WILLOW DRIVE INTERSECTION REVIEW Prq)ared for: City of Orono Prqiared by: Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates, Inc.I 1. h August 2003 e i Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk - St. Paul, MN - (651)636-1311 Introduction The intersection of CSAH 6 and Willow Drive is located in the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Figure 1 shows the location of the intersection. This report examines the existing conditions of that intersection including traffic operations, accident experience, and sight distance. In addition, this report discusses possible intersection improvements that may reduce or eliminate problems identified in the existing conditions. Finally, cost estimates of the improvements are provided. Existing Conditions Roadway and Intersection Geometries CSAH 6 is a two>lane roadway classified as an “A” Minor Arterial on the Hennepin Coimty functional classification map. CSAH 6 has a SS-mph speed limit in this area. Willow Drive is also a two-lane roadway classified as a collector road. The south leg of Willow Drive is designated as MSA 101 on the Municipal State Aid (MSA) System. The speed limit is 40-mph on Willow Drive in this area. The intersection of these two roads is currently under two-way stop sign control with Willow Drive traffic stopping. Each approach on CSAH 6 is provided wiUi a by-pass lane at the intersection. With this extra lane, motorists treat each ^proach as providing one left tum/through lane and one through/right turn lane. Willow Drive provides one lane for all movements for each approach. Traffic Volumes Approach counts for this intersection were collected by Hennepin County on March 19-21,2003. Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates (BRAA) collected turning movement counts on October IS, 2002 from 6 to 9 a.in. and 3 to 6 p.m. Figure 2 shows the daily volumes and the a.m. and p.m. peak hour turning movements for this intersection. The fiiU counts are provided in the appendix of this report. The daily capacity of a two-lane road, the point at which congestion would be expected to start becoming a major problem, is approximately 12,000 to 18,000. The variation is due to the amount of access and tie treatment at intersections. A two-lane road with controlled access and turn lanes at most intersections would have a higher capacity than one with more access and limited turn lanes. As shown m Figure 2, the existing ^ily traffic volumes of both CSAH 6 and Willow Drive arc well below the daily capacity of a typical two-lane road. A capacity analysis was performed on the intersection using the existing turning movement counts. The capacity andysis uses the methodology presented in the Highway Cigiacity Manual to determine how well or poorly an intersection is operating. The results are presented in terms of level of service. A level of service A represents the best operations with little to no delay for vehicles traveling through the intersection. A level of service F represents the worst operation CSAH 6 & Willow Dr IntersectiM Review -I-City of Orono .s ■^'ru/r. Bonestroo Rosenc Anderllk - St. Paul, MN - (651)636-1311 CSAH 6 & i^LLOW DR INTERSECTION ““ * 1 . ' ^ • i \\NN\ _ VVVNsN W\ NSN. XnN \N\ >/T> P .r/:r—,b\v:ii^\\\v \ Dicka.f“i-%^Laki- Lake Classen 1 i:?l4 r > »• .• A-' M ij ritvAi'^ JiSr cs w ct-'i 1.-V £Ci.afi cn ?!2\ ^;wli;r-i^"jSi.Vi(|ji |/ gL. V’&i ■•' ,;j| S e'--'-A.-J‘^ Michoel N A /'■ Forest Loke ■t ‘r I 1000 2000 Scale in feet Waconia ^kaska ^oloqne '1 4^- LE7 ;r. "t/i R V t -kvT/ / \i y SHAKOPEE Prior j LokeQT 1 / . . /_{ ------- ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN HASTINGS FIGURE 1 - LOCATION MAP ORONO. MINNESOTA CSAH 6 * WILLOW OR INTERSECTION REVIEW mft Qonem l:\U9\l3903l39\R«po<t Fi«urM Jk^ Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk - St. Paul, MN - (651)636-1311 FIGURE 2 - EXISTING VOLUMES l/ll BonettFoo ORONO. MINNESOTA CSAH 6 * WIUOW OR INTERSECTION REVIEW AndmMk A l:\139\1300J130\R^)ort FIgurat .1 >■ Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik - St. Paul, MN - (651)636-1311 with major delays and congestion in the intersection. Level of service D is usually considered acceptable by most agencies. Table 1 shows the results of the capacity analysis for each approach direction. In addition to the level of service, the capacity analysis also provides the 9S"' percentile queue lengths for each approach. The 95 percentile queue length is the distance at which 95 percent of the queues will be at or below under these conditions. Table! Level of Service Results and 95'*' Percentile Queue Lengths Under Existing Conditions Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southboxmd Approach Approach Approach Approach AM Peak Hour Level of Service A A C D 95 %ile Queue Length ~35 Feet -42 Feet ~144 Feet -237 Feet PM Peak Hour Level of Service A A D D 95 %ile Queue Length ~32 Feet ~48 Feet -183 Feet -197 Feet As shown in the table, the level of service results under existing conditions are acceptable during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. It should be noted that the northbound and southbound approaches are at the edge of level of service E. The 95'*' percentile queue lengths for the northbound and southbound approaches equate to 7 -10 vehicles. The northbound queue is starting to encroach upon the intersection of Willow View and Shadowood Drive and could become a problem in the future as traffic volumes continue to increase. Crash Experience Crash data for the past three years (January 1,2000 to December 31,2002) was obtained from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT). During this time, Mn/DOT recorded 18 total crashes at the intersection of CSAH 6 and Willow Drive. Of these, 1 was a fatal crash and 8 were injury crashes. Using standard formulas, the number of crashes was translated into a crash rate, severity rate, and crash density. Table 2 below shows the rates as well as the metro and statewide averages for this type of intersection. Table 2 Crash Information for a Rural, Two-Way Stop Intersection Crash Rate (per million veh) Severity Rate (per million veh) Crash Density (tt per year) CSAH 6 & Willow Drive 1.71 5.14 6.0 Metro Average 0.30 0.60 1.1 Statewide Average 0.40 1.00 0.7 CSAH 6 A WUlow Dr Intersection Review CityofOroao k . i , 1 Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk - St. i^aCn, MN - (651)636-1311 As shown in the table, this intersection is experiencing more crashes and more severe crashes than typical intersections of this type. Exceeding the averages could indicate a problem at the intersection. Sight Distance According the Mn/DOT road design manual, a passenger vehicle stopped on Willow Drive should be provided with 1,450 feet of sight distance to the east and to the west along CSAH 6. A profile of CSAH 6, based on the topography for the intersection area, was used to determine the existing sight distance. To the west, the si^t distance exceeds 1500 feet and meets the Mn/DOT standard. To the east on CSAH 6, the sight distance is approximately 750 feet, well short of the desired distance. Based upon the CSAH 6 profile and Mn/IX)T design standards, the sight distance to the east could be a potential problem for stopped vehicles on Willow Drive. Potential Intersection Improvements As identified in the previous section, the intersection of CSAH 6 and Willow Drive has three potential problems: • Higher than average crash experience • Less than standard sight distance to the east for stopped vehicles on Willow Drive • 95'*' percentile queue length beginning to encroach on the previous intersection of Willow Drive and Sbadowood Drive In addition, the p.m. peak hour capacity analysis shows the northbound and southbound approaches are close to falling into level of service E, which would be an unacceptable condition. Based on these potential problems, this intersection could benefit firom both capacity .md safely improvements. Capacity Improvements The capacity of the intersection could be improved through a different type of control and/or additional turning lanes on any or all approaches. To employ a different traffic control device, the traffic volumes at the intersection must meet certain thresholds, or warrants. Mn/DOT uses these warrants to provide the minimum guidelines for installation of either all-way stop control or traffic signal control. There are eight warrants for traffic signals and four warrants for all-way stop sign control. The vehicular volume warrants fur a traffic signal and all-way stop were first examined using the approach counts from Hennepin County. Under existing conditions, these volumes do cot satisfy the criteria for traffic signal warrants, but do satisfy the criteria for all-way stop control. Using the pea., period turning movement counts, the peak hour traffic pignal warrant and the all-way stop control warrant were both sahsfied. CSAH 6 & Willow Dr Intersection Review -5-City ofOrono * . • I f 1 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik - St. Paul, MN - (651)636'*1311 Based on the warrant analyses, all-way stop sign control could be implemented at this intersection now. By meeting the peak hour traffic signal warrant with the BRAA turning movement volumes, a traffic signal may be justified at this location. Furthermore, several warrants are close to being satisfied using either set of volumes. This suggests the intorsecfion may justify a traffic signal baaed on several warrants in the near future. Crash data can be used to satisfy one traffic signal warrant and one all-way stqi control warrant. Both require 5 or more correctable crashes within a 12-month period (The traffic signal warrant also requires minimum volumes). Correctable crashes are those that would likely be prevented widi the new intersection control, such as a right angle crash. From January 1 to December 31, 2002, Mn/DOT recorded 4 crashes at this Intersection. Three of these crashes would likely be correctable with either signal or all-way stop sign control. However, this does not satisfy the crash ejqierience warrant. The full warrant analyses are provided in the appendix of this report Besides a traffic control change, turning lanes could be added to the intersection of CSAH 6 and Willow Drive to improve the capacity. Based iqran the existing condition and volumes, the most benefit would likely be gained by providing one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane for the eastbound and westbound aiq|)toacbes on CSAH 6. Willow Drive would also benefit firom providing one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane on the northbound and southbound approaches to the intersection. To fully examine the possible benefits from the additional lanes and/or a traffic control change, the intersection was re-analyzed with each feature during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Table 3 shows the results of the new capacity analyses during the a.m. peak hour. Table 4 shows the results during the p.m. peak hour. As before, the 95" percentile queue lengths are also (wesented with the level of service results. CSAH 6 & Willow Dr Intersectioo Review City of OroQO .4 . Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk - St. Paul, MN - (6S1)636-1311 Table 3 AM Pnk Hour Level of Service Results and 95"' Percentile Queue Lengths Under Existing & I^oposed Lane Usage widi Stop Sign & Signal Control Two-Way Stop Control Existing Oeometiv Level of Service 95 %ile Queue Length Proposed Geometry* Level of Service 95 %ile Queue Length All-Way Stop Control Existing Geometry Level of Service 95 %ile Queue Length Proposed Geometry* Level of Se*'- :ce 95 %ile Queue Length TralHc Signal Control Existing Geometry Level of Service 95 %ile Queue Length Proposed Geometry* Level of Service 95 %ile Queue Length Eastbound Approach A ^35 Feet A -33 Feet B -212 Feet D 1.326 Feet B 252 Feet A 204 Feet Westbound Ainroacb A -42 Feet A -28 Feet B -92 Feet B -117 Feet B -98 Feet A -108 Feet Northbound Approach C -144 Feet C -151 Feet B -92 Feet A —46 Feet B -78 Feet B -68 Feet Southbound Approach D •237 Feet C 101 Feet A -59 Feet A -51 Feet B 123 Feet B -70 Feet * Proposed Geometry refers to providing one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane for the easdMund and westbound approach on CSAH 6. The northbound and southbound fg)proacbes on Willow Drive would be provided with one left turn laiu», one through lane, and one right turn lane. CSAH 6 A Willow Dr lalenectioa Review -7.C^ofOtono i A Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk - St. Paul, MN - (651)636-1311 Table 4 PM Peak Hour Level of Service Results and 95 ’*' Percentile Queue Lengths Under Existing & Proposed Lane Usage with Stop Sign & Signal Control Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Two-Way Stop Control Existing Geometry Level of Service A A D D 95 %ile Queue Length ~32 Feet -48 Feet -183 Feet -197 Feet Proposed Geometry* Level of Service A A C C 95 %ile Queue Length -26 Feet -28 Feet -113 Feet -no Feet All-Way Stop Control Existing Geometry Level of Service A B A A 95 %ile Queue Length -53 Feet -218 Feet -68 Feet -63 Feet Proposed Geometry* Level of Service A D A A 95 %ile Queue Length -60 Feet -1,723 Feet Feet -52 Feet Traffic Signal Control Existing Geometry Level of Service A B B B 95 %ile Queue Length -61 Feet -197 Feet -102 Feet -141 Feet Proposed Geometry* Level of Service A A B B 95 %ile Queue Length -57 Feet -178 Feet -83 Feet -73 Feet Proposed Geometry refers to providing one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane for the eastbound and westbound approach on CSAii 6. The northbound and southbound approaches on Willow Drive would be provided with one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. CSAH 6 A Willow Dr imefsedioa Review -8-^ityofdnsao tsa A. J r k Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik - St. Paul, MN - (6S1)636-1311 Based on the infonnation in the two previous tables, the conditions at the intersection would inq>rove with die proposed turn lanes, except under all-way stop control. All-way stop control appears to work tte best with the existing t^-pass lanes. This is due to the ability of through tradBc on CSAH 6 to use either lane to travel through the intersection, rather than backing up in only one lane. Safety Improvements The safe^ of the intersection could be improved through either a traffic control change and/or sight distance inqirovement. As noted in the previous section, all-way stop is currently warranted for the intersection. A traffic signal is also wananted based on BRAA collected turning nxivement counts for the intersection of CSAH 6 and Willow Drive. A traffic control change is only effective if the accident experience at the intersection shows correctable crashes, such as right angle crashes. In this case, 12ofthe 18 crashes would likely be corrected by either all-way stop or traffic signal control. A traffic control change at this intersecdon would likely improve safety based on this informadon. The sight distance to the east on CSAH 6 is currenUy well short of Mn/DOT road design standards. Re-grading the road to improve the slope and improve the sight distance would likely benefit safety at this intersecdon. To provide this improvement, the east leg of the intersecdon would need to be lowered by about 1 foot over a distance of approximately 600 feet Finally, another safety improvement could be made if the proposed geometry of the previous intersecdon is implemented. Providing a raised, concrete me^an on CSAH 6 at the intersecdon would physically separate the two direcdons of traffic. Medians are e^iecially effecdve on high qreed roadways such as this CSAH 6. Figures 3 and 4 show the intersecdon wifo the prv^osed capacity and safety improvements. CSAH 6 A Willow Dr Intersection Review -9-City of Orono 4»...... an 4 J FIGURE 3 - PRELIMINARY LAYOUT OF PROPOSED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ORONO. MINNESOTA CSAH 6 It WUUOm OR INTERSECnON REVIEW l:\lSt\13903l39\Mtfort Flgurt*>> • CD 0 3 fD VI rt 1 Oo o VI fD 3 fD > 3 Ql fD -1 V) rt •o wn M W Ol UJ I M Ui M M iiiHL r ' I- •J"- :• '^^ -r - , ' > ' vr :'i ii- ■ vt-’ • *J ''i, V 'r—Existing Roodwoy # ____________________________________________________________________^ — -.....--y—/ ■j- — ^=t= 1 1 1 1 .-'ll r ■ \j t ii ■1 1 I 11 ii 1 V 'Lyy//V Proposed Roodwoy </ y Scole in feet Ar-^r:Xr~XZAZAbAsiA^A-A-A->^^ FIGURE 4 - PRELIMINARY LAYOUT OF PROPOSED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ORONO. MINNESOTA CSAH 6 4t WLLOW OR INTERSECTION REVCW I:\n9\13903139\‘le^rt HgurM J/U Bondttno nciwwa OBo 3 ID rt -1 O O 50 0 v» ID 3 (D > 3a. ID 1 Ul rl •3 fD o> l/i M W Uio> I M UJ M M r Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik - St. Paul, MN - (651)636-1311 Cost Eftimate Based \q>on the proposed improvements listed in the previous sections, a preliminary cost estimate was prepa^. The cost estimate assumes that the east leg would be totally reconstructed to correct the sight distance deficiency. On the other legs of the intersection, the estimate assumes the existing through lanes are preserved while the shoulders are cut away for the roadway expansion. Each component of the cost estimate is presented in Table S below. In addition to the roadway improvements, a cost estimate is included for providing storm sewer in several sections and a future traffic signal. Based on the preliminary design, suflcient space may not be available to provide for a proper drainage ditch. Both sides along the south leg of Willow Drive and the south side of west leg of CSAH 6 may need storm sewer to properly handle drainage around the intersection. As mentioned in this report, a traffic signal will likely be justified in the near future. Table 5 Preliminary Cost Estimate of Proposed Improvements Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount Mobilization LS 1 S 20,000.00 S 20,000 Traffic Control LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth)LF 3,715 $ 5.00 $ 18,575 Common Excavation TN 945 $ 10.00 $ 95,100 Select Granular Borrow TN 2,715 $ 10.00 $ 30,150 Aggregate Base - Class 5 TN 5,975 $ 9.00 $ 53,775 Bituminous Pavement (Non-wear Course)CY 9,510 $ 40.00 $ 108,600 Bituminous Pavement (Wear Course)CY 3,015 $ 40.00 $ 37,800 Concrete Curb & Gutter LF 2,570 $ 10.00 $ 25,700 Concrete Median SY 720 $ 23.00 $ 16,560 RC Pipe Culvert LF 945 $ 35.00 $ 33,075 RC Pipe Apron with Trash Guard Each 2 $ 1,250.00 $ 2,500 Beehive Stmcture Catch Basin Each 6 $ 1,250.00 $ 7,500 Traffic Sienal LS 1 $180,000.00 $ 180,000 Sub Total $ 634,335 30% Contingency (Signing, Striping, Clearing, Grubbing, Engineering)$ 190,305 Grand Total S 824.640 As shown in the table, the oqiected improvements have a preliminary cost estimate of S 824,640. This amount includes the proposed roadway improvements in addition to providing storm sewer for drainage in select areas and a future traffic sigrud at the intersection. CSAH 6 & Willow Dr Intersection Review -12-Chy of Orooo hi i Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik - St. Paul, MN - (651)636-1311 Conclutiont and Reconunendationt Based upon the information presented in this report, the following conclusions have been drawn regarding the intersection of County Statc>Aid Highway (CSAH) 6 and Willow Drive: • The daily volumes of CSAH 6 and Willow Drive are both below the daily capacity of a two-lane roadway. • The traffic in the intersection is currently operating at an acceptable level of service. However, traffic operations are close to the threshold between acceptable and unacceptable levels. • The crash rate, severity rate, and crash density of this mtersection are well above the metro and statewide averages for this type of intersection. • The sight distance to the east for a stopped vehicle on Willow Drive does not meet the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/£>OT) road design standards. • All-way stop sign control of the intersection is warranted with current volumes. • Turning movement counts meet the peak hour warrant for traffic signal control of the intersection. Several other warrants for a traffic signal are also close to being satisfied. • Based on capacity analyses of the intersection, traffic operations under all-way stop sign control would be better with the existing traffic lanes. • Based on capacity analyses of the intersection, traffic operations under two-way stop sign control or traffic signal control would improve if each approach to the intersection is provided with one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. • 12 of the 18 reported accidents at this intersection are of a type likely correctable with either all-way stop or traffic signal control. • The sight distance at the intersection could be improved by lowering the elevation of the east leg of CSAH 6 by approximately 1 foot over a distance of600 feet. • With additional turn lanes at the intersection, safety could be further improved by providing a raised, concrete median on CSAH 6. At this time, it is recommended that the intersection control be changed to all-way stop sign control. Upon implementing, it will be important to provide proper signing to warn CSAH 6 traffic of the new stop condition. Although approach volumes for the intersection do not currently meet the warrants for a traffic signal, historic increases suggest that they will be met soon. When a traffic signal is warranted and justified for the intersection, the proposed lane and safety improvements should then be made to the intersection. The proposed improvements include providing one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane for each approach, providmg a raised concrete median on CSAH 6 at the intersection, and lowering the grade on the east leg of CSAH 6 to improve the sight distance. The preliminary cost estimate for this woik, including some drainage work and the traffic signal, as detailed earlier, is $ 824,640. CSAH 6 A Willow Dr Intersection Review -li-ACbyofOraoo A • J Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik - st. Paul, mn - (651)636-1311 Appendix i eSAH 6 ft Willow Dr Tmeixectioii Pleview CifyofOrooo b. » Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik - st. Paul, mn - (6S1)636-1311 TURN MOVEMENT COUNTS AT THE INTERSECTION OF COUNTY ROAD 6 AND WILLOW DRIVE N-SSiiwt: Willow Drivt E-WSimt: CR6 City: Orono County: Hcnntpin Dole: Oct IS, 2002 Doy: Tucflday Project#: 139^.120 Northbound Southbound Eambound Weitbound Time Left Through Right Left Through Right Uti Through Richt Uft Through Right Total 6J0-6>(SAM 0 11 3 8 29 1 1 84 2 1 14 0 154 6:45-7.-00AM 1 10 3 8 27 9 2 132 10 3 22 6 233 7:00-7:15 AM 1 17 9 7 19 2 4 119 14 8 25 3 228 1:15-8:30 AM 4:00-4:15 PM 1 14 15 11 18 8 6 105 8 26 22 134 4 16 5:15 -5:30 PM 5:30-5:45 PM 26 23 14 7 2 4 14 17 *11 9 7 50 44 4 5 16 14 179 145 15 15 335 292 5:45 - 6:00 PM 1 19 4 4 8 9 17 36 2 14 89 18 219 Grand Total 49 311 150 107 337 155 126 1,415 149 186 1469 168 4,722 ApprH Dir%l.OS I0.8H 6.65ft 3.2%2.3% 12.75ft 7.1H 3.3%2.7% 35.8% 30.0%3.2%3.9% 40.7% 33.2%3.65ft AM Pk (7:15-8:15)9 70 44 46 110 60 39 627 78 33 159 13 U88 Dir 5ft 0.75ft 5.4H 3.4%3.6%S.55ft 4.7%3.0%48.7%6.1%2.6%12.3%I.OK PM Pk (4:15-5:15)21 99 41 14 70 43 25 177 18 63 78m 78 1,429 DirH 1.55ft 6.95ft 2.9%1.0%4.95ft 3.0%1.7%12.4%1.3%4.4%54.6%3.55ft Notei: AM Peak Hour Factor PM Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.96 mmm k 1 . kic Wf:. AuguMaOOS # Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik - St. Paul, MN - (6S1)636-1311 L Trafflc Signal Wairant Analysis - Tuniing Movement Counts Major Street Approaches: Minor Street Approaches: County State Aid Highway 6 Northbound: Willow Drive Number of Lanes: Approach Speed: Total App. Vehicles: 2 55 1.690 Number of Lanes: Approach Speed: Total App. Vehicles: 1 40 510 Westbound: County State Aid Highway 6 iuid: Willow Drive Number of Lanes: Approach Speed: Total App. Vehicles: 2 55 1,923 Number of Lanes: Approach Speed: Total App. Vehicles: 1 40 599 Count Date:15-Oct-02 Bonestroo File #: 139-03-139 Analysis of Wairant 1: 8-Hour Volumes Hour Besin 12 AM 1AM 2AM 3AM 4AM 5AM 6AM TAM 8 AM 9AM lOAM II AM 12PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4PM 5 PM 6PM TPM 8PM 9 PM 10 PM IIPM Main (Tot^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 2TT 934 340 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1106 956 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Side Street Direction Rank 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 185 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 169 133 0 0 0 0 0 0 ND NB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 1 4 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 2 3 6 6 6 6 6 6 Condition A Meets Criteria? - - -BOTH- - - BOTH- - - BOTH- - - Condition B Meets Criteria? SIDE - - -BOTH- SIDE - - -BOTH- - - -BOTH Condition A+B Meets Criteria? ! -.-a + b--- - - -A + B- --A + B- CondHion A is the Minimum Vehicular Volume Warrant Condition B is the Interuption of Continuous Traffic Warrant. Cotylitiftii a-*-B is the combination of Conditions A and B at 80H. Bonestroo. Rosene. And«Uk, and Associates. Inc.August 2003 a.-. Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk - St. Paul, MN - (651)636-1311 Signal Wanant Analysis - Turning Movement Counts Wairant Summary: Warrant 1 - Eight Hour Vehicular Volume Condition A: Not Satisfied Required values reached for 3 hours. Eight hours required. Criteria - Main St. 420 Side St. lOS Condition B: Not Satisfled Required values reached for 3 hours. Eight hours required. Criteria • Main St. 630 Side SL S3 Condition A+B: Not Satisfied Required values reached for 3 hours. Requires volumes to meet 80 percent of requirement of A and of B for eight hours, not necessary the same eight hours Criteria • Main St 480 720 Side St. 120 60 Warrant 2 • Four Hour Vehicular Volume Not Satisfied Required values reached fer 3 hours. Four hours required. See chan for criteria. Wairant 3 - Peek Hour Vehicular Volume Condition A' Satisfled Criteria - Total pproach Volume: 800 Minor Street high Side Volume: ICO Minor Street High Side f telay: 4 vehicle-houn Condition B: Satisfied Required values reached for 3 hours. One hour required. See c..irt for criteria. Wanant 4 • Pedestriaii Volume Not Examined Criteria - Four-Hour Pedestrian Volume: Peak Hour Pedestrian Volume: 100 190 Warrant 5 • School Crossing Not Examined. Warrunt 6 - Coordinated Signal System Not Examined. Warrant 7 - Crash Experience Not Satisfled Criteria - S or more correctable accidents, and - Vehicular volumes meeting 80 percent of Warrant 1 condition A or 3, or. ■■ Pedestrian volumes meeting 80 percent of Wairant 4 conditions. Warrant 8 - Roadway Network Not Examined. Muulway Stop Warrant - Minimum Vehicular Volume Not Satisfied Required values reached for 2 houn. Eight hours required. Criteria • Main St 210 Side St 140 • II 1%stroo, Rosene, Anderllk. and Associates, Inc.August 2003 I tpn W ^ I 4S0 400 O 3S0 S 300 Vi ft § 250 I- 200 I * ISO e 2 100 V • . , ,Jb •f. ik.-'.,sg&V* ■.'.M FIGURE 4C-1/2 WARRANT 2 - FOUR-HOUR VEHlCUL^iR VOLUME G9 O \ V \X A A A ----------X— A •--------#--------i •-------------#------------<► L ...............................■■■ m C/l rf Oo 73 O in fD rD > fD -1 CA ft 200 400 600 800 1000 Major SCroet Volono (Both Approaches) 1200 1400 c% Kn M UJ 91 I M < Ul H» M Warrant Thraihold A latersectkxi Voluoiei 4S0 400 350 E 300 Oi 250a I 200 150 100 ^ 1; w . r •• m4' {■* FIGURE 4C-3/4 WARRANT 3 - PEAK-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME \ \ \ A 4 4 ▲>------♦------i >--------»-------i * ----- o 3 0 C/l f-r 1 8 9 O l/i (D rD m 1 U) rt •o Ai 1 I a^v/v M 400 10 800 1000 1200 MajOT Stmt Voiuia (Balk AppffMdM) 1400 1600 OI Ui Cl I M UI IM Wmm Threiliold A btenectioiiVolumef __ • m ■* ; ^ . ■ >, ' -■ rmm‘mm '•V ■: 4 ' J nneFfinw: Mtrch 19-3I.2003 OayK Wc«lne«ky, Thuiadiy, Kriilq^ NuithbtMinlun Willow Hourly Startii«rirae 19-M» 30-Mar 31-Mar Avcmse APPROACH VOLUMES AT INTERSECTION OF CSAH 6 & WILLOW DRIVE Type: Appruach Counlx Piujccti: 139-03-139 Counter Heiwvpin County Gty: Oiono Suulhbounil on Willow Houily 19-Mir 20-Mtr 21-Mit Average Baatbound on CSAH 6 Hourly 19-Mar 20-Mar 21-Mar Avenge 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM SQOAM 6:00 AM 7 3 2 3 4 8 44 6 7 2 3 3 7 37 7 5 2 3 4 8 41 4 4 5 2 9 26 134 8 3 I I 4 19 120 6 4 3 2 7 23 127 8 8 IM*' 10 69 109 378 8 6 6 11 61 120 357 8 > 4 II 6S 115 368 WestboiinlofiCSAH6 HoirV 19-Mir 20-Mar 21-Mar Avenge 18 14 16 17 S 4 4 16 68 14 4 7 4 16 62 16 5 6 4 16 65 Total imefaectkfi Average 37 32 14 22 80 162 601 8:00 AM 66 63 65 144 128 136 339 319 144 118 131 651 9:00 AM 68 56 62 90 93 92 176 146 161 120 108 114 429 10:00 AM 66 49 58 68 73 71 137 113 125 108 95 102 356 11:00 AM 70 95 83 68 78 73 126 125 126 144 148 146 428 12:00 PM 99 90 95 68 62 65 130 132 131 164 138 151 442 1:00 PM 80 86 83 48 66 57 120 123 122 164 174 169 431 2:00 PM 102 86 94 72 78 75 199 182 191 238 258 248 608 3:00 PM 108 110 109 98 96 97 170 159 165 500 449 475 846 5:00 PM 139 107 123 116 95 106 177 167 172 S36 469 490 899 6:00 PM 122 78 100 86 76 81 170 133 152 369 266 268 601 7:00 PM 68 61 65 55 38 47 117 95 106 162 135 149 367 8.^ PM 73 60 67 54 34 44 80 66 73 140 112 126 310 9H»PM 52 35 44 34 24 29 48 52 50 90 87 89 212 10:00 PM 27 19 23 16 19 18 29 26 28 4t 48 43 114 11:00 PM 10 16 13 to 10 10 13 19 16 39 46 43 82 TMk 1,021 1J06 396 M67 755 M39 683 1,444 1,429 3,280 1,740 3429 2$n 3423 221 94« Notea: V. • , 111 • Aftef mo 3ro inrr n § oin ID I in rt I V/1 w ov UJa^ I M UJ M Bonestroo Rosene AnderUk - st. Paul, MN - (651)636-1311 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis • Approach Counts Major Street Approaches: Minor Street Approaches: Eastbound: County State Aid Highway 6 Northbound: Willow Drive Number of l anes: Approach Speed: Total App. Vehicles: 2 55 3^29 Number ofl^mes: Approach Speed: Total App. Vehicles: I 40 U67 Westbound: County State Aid Highway 6 Southbound: Willow Drive Number of Lanes: 2 Approach Speed: 55 Total App. Vehicles: 3,S64 Number of Lanes: Approach Speed: Total App. Vehicles: 1 40 1,444 Count Date: March 19 • 21,2003 Bonestroo File »: 139^)3-139 Analysis of Warrant 1: 8-Hour Volumes Hour Begin 12AM 1AM 2AM 3 AM 4AM 5 AM 6AM TAM SAM 9AM 10 AM 11AM 12 PM 1 PM 2PM 3PM 4PM 5PM 6PM TPM 8PM 9PM 10PM 11PM Main (Total) 24 23 9 IT 69 131 433 69T 450 2T5 22T 2T2 282 291 439 640 699 6T0 420 255 199 139 T3 59 Volume Side Street Direction Rank 7 5 3 3 7 23 127 174 136 92 71 83 95 83 94 109 137 123 100 65 67 44 23 13 NB NB SB NB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB 20 22 23 23 20 17 4 1 3 10 13 11 8 11 9 6 2 5 7 15 14 16 17 19 Condition A Meets Criteria? BOTH BOTH- •BOTH MAIN •BOTH BOTH- •BOTH MAIN ConditiooB Meetr Criteria? SIDE - - -BOTH SIDE SIDE SIDE SIDE SIDE SIDE SIDE - - -BOTH - - -BOTH- - - -BOTH SIDE SIDE S0>E Condition A-i-B Meets Criteria? A ONLY A ONLY A ONLY CoodMioo A is the Minimum Vehicular Volume Warrant. Condition B is the Intouption of Continuous Traffic Warrant Condition A-i-B is the combinalion of Conditioos A and B at 80%, Bonestroo, Roaene, AwterUk. and AroociMea, Inc.Ai(ust2003 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik - St. Paul, MN - (651)636-1311 Traffic Signal Warrant Analyiis - Approach Counts Warrant Sununary: Warrant I • Eight Hour Vehicular Volume Condition A; Not Satisfied Required values reached for 6 houn. Eight hours required. Criteria - Main St 420 Side St lOS Conditioo B: Not Satisfied Required values reached for 4 hours, Eight hours required. Criteria - Main St 630 Side St. S3 Cooditiem A-t-B: Not Satisfied Required values reached for 0 hours. Requires volumes to meet 80 percent of requirement of A and of B for eight hours, not necessary the same eight hours. Criteria - Main St 480 720 Side St. 120 60 Warrant 2 • Four Hour Vehicular Volume Not Satisfied Required values reached for 3 hours. Four hours required. See chart for criteria. Warrant 3 - Peak Hour Vehicular Volume Conditioo A: Not Examined Criteria - Total Approach Volume: 800 Minor Street High Side Volume: 150 Minor Street High Side Delay: S vehicle-hours Condition B: Not Satisfied Required values reached for 0 hours. One hour required. See chart for criteria. Warrant 4 - Pedestrian Volume Not Examined Criteria - Four-Hour Pedestrian Volume: Peak Hour Pedestrian Volume: 100 190 Warrant S - School Crossing Not Examined. Warrant 6 - Coordinated Signal System Not Examined. Warrant 7 - Crash Experience Not Satisfied Criteria - 5 or more correctable accidents, and - Vehicular volumes meeting 80 pacent of Warrant 1 condition A or B, or. - Pedestrian volumes meeting 80 percent of Warrant 4 conditions. Warrant 8 • Roadway Network Not Examined. Multiway Stop Warrant - Minimum Vehicular Volume Satisfied Required values reacted fiv 12 houn. Eight houn requved. Criteria - Main St 210 Side St 140 Bonestroo, RoMoe, Anderlik, and Assoctees, Inc.August 2003 mm, nCURE 4C-1/2 WARRANT 2 - FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME CD O •• . , fD rt Oo ;oo fD > IDn X- I (/) rt C i I a\ M UHm I M U» M Waffant Threshold A Ifiteneclioo Voluoiei « • I V’ 450 400 I 350 300 mm g 250 I 200 Im ISO o 100 MM :V • ' . - FIGURE 4C-3/4 WARRANT 3 - PEAK-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME GOo \i A ▲ A i .A ►------•------<>------♦------i► JlL (A rf § ;oo (A fD 3 (D I C V • •400 MaJcrStrwtV 1000 1200 (Bdfc Approaches) 1400 M a\ UJ Ol I H* Ul M M Wmm Thftshold A Intenectioo Volumes BiitenMOiii __.jiAl MU*# • r AUG 1 t 2003 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY Oh OflONO DATE: Augusts, 2003 ITEM NO: / / Department Approval: Nan* Ron Moorse Titk City Administrator Adminbtrator Reviewed: Item Description: Payment Request Numbn 6- Navarre Fire Station Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report The City has received three invoices for services related to the Navarre Fire Station 1 . Constructive Ideas for project management services in the amount of $3^40.00. 2. BKV Group for architectural services in the amount of $2,378.74 3. BKV Group for architectural services in the amount of S11,547.89 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the requests for payment in the amount of $3,240.00 to Constructive Ideas, and to BKV Group in the amounts of $2,378.74 and $I 1,547.89, to be funded from the Navarre Fire Station Construction Fund. f Invoice Date:Auguet 1,2003 No: 4273 To:City of Orono Date Due: 9/1/03 P. O. Box 66 CIIJobNo: 03 018 Orono, MN 5S323 Account No: 342 Date May 2003 Navarre Fire Station Pewription Construction Phase - July Billing Total amount this invoice: Ifrs. 1 l.s. Amount 3.240 00 $3,240.00 BKV C R O U f Archit«cfur« Inferior Dtsign EngioMfing Boormon Krooi VOQ«l Group Inc 222 North Socond Stroot Minnoapolii, MN 55401 lOafW 6123393752 FocsMo: 612339^212 www.bkvgroup.com EOE Billing Group 001 Tolili: I nvoice Invoice Number 20719 Invoice Dale: June 25,2005 CitvofOrono 2750 KeUev Paikwav P.O. Box 66 Orono. MN 55323-0066 Attention: Mr. Ron Moone Project: 1124.10 City of Orono-Fire Station Professional Services throush 6/25/2003 Billing Group: Contract III: 001 Contract Amount: Percent Complete: Fee Earned: Prior Fee Billings: $110,500.00 80.00% $88,400.00 $77J50.00 Current Fee Total:$11,050.00 Billing Group Total:$11,050.00 Billing Group: Contract #: rclmb Reimburtablcs BUUh| Groop rciaib Total*: 1^.: BKV Croup, Inc. Project: 1124.10 Invoice: 20719 June 25.2003 Page2of2 EaiifinK Copy Paper 8 1/2 X 11 Delivery Service Document Printing Express Mail Services Fax Mileage/Travel Postage Reimbursables Totals Charge 80.85 41.13 248.15 60.66 43.00 23.73 0.37 $497.89 Billing Croup Total: Project Totals: $497.89 ♦** Invoice Total ***$11347.89 Billing Summary Ciitreni EiiiU Tota Professional Services $11,050.00 $77,350.00 $88,400.0( Reimbursable Expenses:$497.89 $5,303.86 $5,801.7i Outside Servf'es:$0.00 $0.00 $0.0( Other Services and Fees:$0.00 $0.00 $0.0<] Finance Charges:$0.00 $0.00 $0.0( Taxes:$0.00 $0.00 $0.0( Toul:$11,547.89 $82,653.86 $94,201.75 ik # • fe BKV C R O U F Archit«<tur« Interior Detign Enginoering Boormon Kroot Vo9«l Croup Inc 222 North Second Street MinneopotU, MN 55401 Uiphenet 6X13393752 fbciMfe 612^^212 www.bkvgroup.com COE Billing Gmup 001 Totalt: rscb&veo Invoice Invoice Number 20801 Invoice DNe; July 25.2003 Citv of Orono 2750 Kellev Parkwav P.O. Box 66 Orono. MN 55323-0066 Anention: Mr. Ron Moorse Project: 1124.10 City of Orono-Fire Sution Professional Services throush 7/25/2003 Billing Group: Contract M: 001 Contract Amount: Percent Cong>Iete: Fee Earned: Prior Fee Billings: SI 10.500.00 82.00% 590.610.00 588.400.00 Current Fee Total:$2,210.00 Billing Group Total:S2.210.00 Billing Group: Contract #: rclmtt Outside Services y iimn^ninhf^ih Billing Granp rcinib Totals: BKV Group, Inc. Project: 1124.10 Invoice: 20801 July 2S. 2003 Page 2 of2 Expense £TU£g£ Consultant Reimb.11.40 Outside Sendees Totab SI 1.40 Relmbursables Expense Charge Bond Paper by S.F.1.50 Consultant Reimb.11.40 Ct^yPaperS I/2x 11 33.75 Delivery Service 39.90 Express Mail Services 8.46 Fax 4.50 Long Dist Telephone Chrgs 1.62 Mileage/Travel 56.21 Reimbursables Totals SI 57.34 Billing Group Total: Project Totals: SI68.74 I *** Invoice Total ***$2478.74 Billlag Sumn r' y £untoi Edfil Tota Professional Services S2.210.00 $88,400.00 S90.610.0( Reimburssbie Expenses:SI 57.34 S5.801.75 S5.959.0S Outside Services:$11.40 $0.00 S11.4( 0 -er Services and Fees:$0.00 SO.OO $0.0( Finance Charges:SO.OO SO.OO $0.0( Tsxes;so.oo SO.OO $0.0( ToUl:S2.378.74 S94.20l.75 S96.S80.4S _____ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^ Cl I r OF ohono DATE: August 7,2003 ITEM NO; /SL Departmcut Approval: Name LinVee Administralor Reviewed: Title City Clerk / Agenda Section: City Administrator's ____Report L Item Description: Adopt New Code for tne City of Orono - Ordinance Attackments:1. 2. Background Ordinance Summary of Changes In 1998 the Council authorized the recodification of the City Code, which was last codified in 1984. Since that time, staff has been working with Municipal Code Corporation to research, edit and recodify the Orono City Code. The City has recently received final copies of the new' Code, which includes alt ordinances that were adopted prior to December 31 ,2002. Ordinances which were adopted between December 31 ,2002 and May 27,2003 are included with Supplement I and will also be adopted as part of the new Code. Prior to distribution of the Code, the City Council must adopt an ordinance enacting the new Code for the City of Orono, Minnesota (see attached). Once the Code is adopted, it will be distributed to those who currently have Code books. It will also be available in a computerized format that can be easily searched by staff and citizens on the Internet. The Code is scheduled to be updated quarterly on the Internet, with hard copies distributed once each year. Changes to the New Code The recodification is basically a reorganization of the existing code. Any substantive changes are outlined in the attached Summary of Changes. An extensive review process was followed, with all departments reviewing the existing Code and changes suggested by Roger Merriam, the Code Attorney who woriced with us f^m Municipal Code Corporation. Organization of New Code Books 1.The listing of Officials of the City of Orono. Minnesota on page iii reflects the officials in office at the time of codification. In the future, an additional page listing the current officials will be included and will be maintained as Municipal Code Corporation is advised of changes. 2.The Preface beginning on page vii is a summary of the history of codification, the materials used, and organization of the Code. 3.The Table of Contents beginning on page xiii outlines each section and chapter within the Code. 4.The body of the Code is divided by tabs identifying each major subject (purple) and chapter (cream). At the beginning of each chapter is the section analysis which lists die articles, divisions and sections which make up the chapter. di Request for Council Action continued July 16.2003 Page 2 5.The Code Comparative Table found at the end of the Code gives the location within the new Code of those sections of the 1984 Code which may be used for reference. 6. The State Law Reference Table, also at the end of the Code, shows the location within the new Code of references to the Minnesota Statutes. 7.Hie Code Index, which is the last section of the Code book, provides a valuable lookup tool to use when researching various topics. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends adopting the attached ordinance enacting a new Code for the City of Orono, Minnesota, providing for the repeal of certain ordinances not included therein; providing a penalty for the violation thereof; providing for the manner of amending such code; and providing when such code and the ordinance shall become effective. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the attached ordinance enacting a new Code for the City of Orono, Minnesota, providing for the repeal of certain ordinances not included therein; providing a penalty for the violation thereof; providing for the manner of amending such Code; and providing when such Code and the ordinance shall become effective. MM w ORDINANCE NUMBER I . THIRD SERIES AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AND ENACTING A NEW CODE FOR THE CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA; mOVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF CERTAIN ORDINANCES NOT INCLUDED THEREIN; PROVIDING A PENALTY FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR THE MANNER OF AMENDING SUCH CODE; AND PROVIDING WHEN SUCH CODE AND THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE The City Council of the City of Orono ordains: SECTION 1. The Code entitled “Orono, Minnesota Code,” published by Municipal Code Corporation, consisting of Chapters 1 through 94, each inclusive, is adopted. SECTION 2. All ordinances of a general and pennanent nature enacted on or before May 27,2003, and not included in the Code or recognized and continued in force by reference therein, are repealed. SECTION 3. The repeal provided for in Section 2 hereof shall not be construed to revive any ordinance or part thereof that has been repealed by a subsequent ordinance that is repealed by this ordinance. SECTION 4. Unless another forfeiture is expressly provided, every person convicted of a violation of any provision of the Code or any ordinance, rule or regulation adopted or issued in pursuance thereof shall be punished by a fine of not more than S700.00, imprisonment for a term not to exceed 90 days, or any combination thereof. Each act of violation and each day upon which any such violation shall continue or occur shall constitute a separate offense. The forfeiture provided by this section, unless another forfeiture is expressly provided, shall apply to the amendment of any Code section, whether or not such forfeiture is reenacted in the amendatory ordinance. In addition to the penalty prescribed above, the City may pursue other remedies such as abatement of nuisances, injunctive relief and revocation of licenses or permits. SECTION 5. Additions or amendment to the Code when passed in such form as to indicate the intention of the Cit> Council to make the same a part of the Code shall be deemed to be incorporated in the Code, so that reference to the Code includes the additions and amendment. SECTION 6. Ordinances adopted afier May 27, 2003, that amend or refer to ordinances that have been codified in the Code shall be construed as if they amend or refer to like provisions of the Code. SECTION 7. This Ordinance shall be published in THE PIONEER and THE LAKER newspapers and shall be effective upon approval and publication. Page I of2 Summary of Changes to the 1984 Orono City Code The following changes were made throughout the code: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Grammar and spelling is corrected and modem phraseology is used. “Policeman ” (and variants thereoO is changed to “police officer ” (and variants thereoO* “Fireman” (and variants thereoO is changed to “firefighter” (and variants thereoO- All provisions are edited in light of the general provisions chapter (Chapter I) and duplicitous material removed. The state statutes are referenced as Minn. Stat. References to a department of public works are changed to reference a department of public services. AH insurance requirements arc changed to a minimum of $1 million. Obsolete sections have been removed. Following is a list of changes that were made to specific sections of the code, followed by comments related to each change: Description of Change Comments 1. Sec. 2-2 - Added to those who can issue citations Added: Septic Inspector, Planning Director. Fire Marshal, Public Works Superintendent, and As designated, subject to Council approval 2. Sec. 2-3 (d) changed time period former owner can make claim Conformed to Minn. Stat. 471.195 by changing the 90 day period to six months 3. Sec. 2-40 (b) deleted listing of items for the order of business at regular meetings Council should adopt a resolution setting out order of business, such as Roll Call, Consent Agenda, Approval of Minutes, Reports by Boards and Commissions, etc. 4. 1984 Code, Chapter 2.06 (5) - Deleted bond requirement Deleted section which required city administrator to furnish surety bond 5. Sec. 2, Article IV “De/»ar/wn?/i/' - Added new section “City Departments ” Language added: “City Departments. City departments shall be established as needed to provide for the delivery of city senices. The heads of such departments shall report to the city administrator, and shall perform such duties as assigned by the city administrator." 6. Sec. 2-171-Added Tees to be established by resolution * Allows Council to adopt fees by resolution, unless a fee change is required by law to be established by ordinance; thus the city is not required to publish and mail an ordinance when there is a fee change during the year. 7. Sec. 2-X12 "Disposal of excess property " - Changed value Estimated value of surplus property changed from $500 to $100. Page 3 8. Sec. 14-37 (\) “Fixing rates and charges for public utilities " • Added language Language added: “No rate or charge involving an increase shall become effective until approved by the council, unless the Council has delegated its rate-setting authority to another authority." 9. See. \4-\\0 “Billing, payment and delinquency" - Changed to reflect current policies Utilities become delinquent after 30 days rather than 45 days; penalty is 8% rather than IS %; dates changed from “September 30" to “September 1 “ and from “between October 1 and 10" to “on or before December I" 10. Chapter 18 “Streets, Sidewalks and Other Public Places “ - Changes to the following sections: Sec. \%-\ “‘Definitions'* - Changes made to “comer”, “private road” and “public road". - Added to "corner" the following: "or the edges of the street pavement or shoulders." - Changed the first sentence of the definition of "private road * to read as follows: "Private road means the entire area dedicated to private use or contained in a plat, an easement, or other conveyance, grant or by adverse possession and shall include but is not limited to, roadways, boulevards, sidewalks, trails, and other property between lateral property lines in which a private roadway lies. ” - Added the words "trails " and "public “ to the definition for "public road" to read as follows: "sidewalks, trails, allexs and other public property between lateral property lines in which a public roadwav lies." Sec. 18-79 ^'Authority of public services director" - Avoided delegation of power problems by adding that the standard for the rules will be preserving the public safety and public and private property. See 18-109 “Issuance “- Added language providing that there is no appeal from the decision of the public services director regarding permits for driveways, curb cuts, etc. Sec 18-138(b) “Maintenance and removal “ Altered so public services director's decision regarding removal of driveway approvals, etc. is not appealable. 11. Sec. 22-89 '• Unlawful Acts ” - Change hours Refers to hours that swimming beaches may not be used. Hours changed from “8:30 p.m. and 8:30 a.m.” to “8:00p.m. and 10:00 a m. “ i I. Summary of Changes to the 1984 Orono City Code July 16,2003 Page 4 12. Chapter 22-95 "Parks and Recreation ” - Added language regarding service dogs 13. Sec. 26-34-Added “Moral Character" 14. Chapter 34 “Alcoholic Beverages " Totally redrafted IS.Sec. 46-31 “FirePrevention and Protection *- Add definition of Fire marshal 16.Ch^ter 54 “Solid Waste Added to Sec. 54-32 “Storage ” item (e) 1 7.Chapter 58 “Environment"- removed ordinance regarding Stubbs Bay sewer properties 18. Chtqjter 66 "Traffic and Vehicles " - Changes to the following sections: “Crosswalks “ - Deleted Sec. 7.15 of 1984 Code Sec. 66-41 "Traffic signs Changes regarding delegation of power Sec. 66-78 (19) “General Parking Prohibitions " - Added section Allows service dogs to accompany certain disabled persons in public places per Minn. Stat. Provides standard for determination of moral character. Conforms to State Statutes Chapter 340A Definition: "Fire marshal means the person appointed by the council to administer and enforce the state fire code, and who operates under the direction of the building official." Language added: “All refuse and garbage deposited in containers for pickup must be kept behind the yard setback line as for the district in which the property is located. Refuse must be deposited at one place, at ground level, on each property. Refuse containers must be returned and placed behind the yard setback line by the owner or tenant on the same day that the garbage or refuse is collected. The intent of this section to allow only on the prior evening and the day of collection the garbage or refuse container to be in front of the yard setback line." As Ord. No. 105,2"" Series was not of a general and permanent nature, it was not codified. The substantive regulations are covered by Minn. Stat. 169.21. The designation of specific crosswalks is not of a general and permanent nature and will be saved from repeal in new code Section 1-12(15). Avoided delegation of power problems by changing the necessary or desirable standard to “necessary or desirable to preserve public safety and the orderly movement of traffic." Language added: “^19) Along any street in a manner that is not parallel to the curb or edge of the street. ” miffi Summary of Changes to the 1984 Orono City Code July 16.2003 Pages Sec. 66-79 ‘ Parallel parking" Revised so as to allow parking on the left side of the road on one-way streets, all other provisions being covered by Minn. Stat. 169.35. Sec. 66-124 "Riding bicycles in business districts - Added language permitting the operation of bicycles on sidewalks located in business districts Sec. 66-158 (4) - Change reference to “habit-forming drugs" - Revised language: “drugs which cause physical or mental impairment." 19. Chapter 70 “Offenses and Miscellaneous Provisions " - Changes to the following sections: Sec. 70-1 Added “Violation of state statutes prohibited." - Added language making it unlawful to violate state statutes Article VI “Juvenile Curfew" - Updated to follow Hennepin County Ordinance No. 16 and Minn. Stat. 145A.05, Subd 7A 20. Sec. 74-2, item (b) (4) "Membership" - Added section regarding alternate planning commission members Added language: "(4) The council may by majority vote appoint one or more alternate planning commission members to serve when regular members are absent. Alternate members shall be chosen at large." 2/. Chapter 78 "Zoning Regulations " - Changes to the following sections: Sec. 78-123 (a) “Issuances"- Revised last sentence to read as follows: “Iheparameters within which a variance may be granted are as follows:" instead of “Undue hardship " as used in cnnneclinn with tho granting of a variance means:" Sec. 78-161 “Districts"- Added “RPUD Residential planned unit development district" to R RESIDENCE DISTRICTS - Added “B-6 Highway commercial district" to B BUSINESS DISTRICTS • J Summary of Changes to the 1984 Orono City Code July 16.2003 Page 6 r -• ♦r3aKJl«>r'fcrt*-4-.r - Change FLOODPLAIN to '^OVERU Y DISTRICT" - Added "SD Shoreland overlay district" to OVERLAY DISTRICTS Sec. 78-163 "Boundaries"- Added the following language regarding district boundary lines: "or in the case of zoning map amendments subsequent to January 1,1975, as legally described in said amendment ordinances." Sec. 78-281 "Setback Regulations" Sec. 78-282 "Lakeshore hardcover and land alteration regulations " Sec. 78-283 "Tree removal regulations" - Delete LR-1A-1 from all three sections as the district does not exist. Sec. 78-563 (a) (2) and (b) (2) "Noncortformities " - Language changed from **effective date of this Section" to "January 13,1983 " Sec. 78-568 (l)(c) "Lot area requirements " - Language changed from "effective date of this Section" to "January 13, 1983" REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AUG 1 1 2003 cirv OK OHONO DATE: August 8,2003 ITEM NO: ) J Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: M Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Resolution in Support of a Continuing Partnership Between the Orono Schoob and Area Cities to Address Substance Abuse A partnership between the Orono Schools and the area Cities to address substance abuse has had remariuible results. These results will be shared with the public at a press conference to be held at 1:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August 19 at the Orono Discovery Center. 5050 Independence Avenue in Maple Plain. Attached is a resolution in support of a continuing partnership to address substance abuse. CpltNOL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the attached resolution in support of a continuing partnership between the Orono Schools and area cities to address substance abuse. ?, I ■ I i i * ^ i: i ! j . ^ » GITYoTORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _ A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF A CONTINUING PARTNERSHIP AMONG THE AREA CITIES AND WITH THE ORONO SCHOOL DISTRICT REGARDING EFFORTS TO ADDRESS CHEMICAL ABUSE WHEREAS, there is strong evidence that drug use significantly affects our school age youth; and and WHEREAS, there is strong evidence that drug use significantly affects our communities; WHEREAS, the remarkable accomplishments of the initial drug enforcement effort by the Medina, Orono and West Hennepin Police Departments demonstrates both the extent of the drug problem in this area and the effectiveness of drug enforcement efforts in addressing the problem; and WHEREAS, there is a strong consensus regarding the importance of continuing efforts to address the chemical abuse problem. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono Minnesota that the City strongly supports a partnership between the area cities and the Orono School District to promote drug prevention. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 11* day of August 2003. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ,k REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^ ^ Cll Y Ol^ ORONO DATE: August 8,2003 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: Item Description: Saga Hill Park Land Exchange Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report When the City of Orono acquired a number of parcels through the DNR"s Natural and Scenic Area Grant Program to create Saga Hill Park, there was one key parcel under separate ownership that was not acquired. This parcel is adjacent to Saga Hill Park on two sides, and is also adjacent to a large ravine which is both a unique natural feature and an environmentally sensitive area. There is currently no developed access to serve the parcel. If the parcel was to be developed for a residential use, access would be provided by constructing a 300 to 400 foot driveway through an undeveloped public right-of-way corridor that is currently in a natural state. The development of the lot and the access would have a substantial impact on the Saga Hill Park area. A number of years ago, the City approached the owner of the parcel to suggest a land exchange that would provide the owner with a replacement residential lot and would enable the parcel to be preserved in its natural state as a part of Saga Hill Park. The owner was not interested in a land exchange at that time. Recently, as the owner was discussing plans for developing the parcel, the subject of the land exchange was again discussed. The owner is now interested in the land exchange. Attached 'n a map showing the total Saga Hill Park area purchased by the City with the assistance of the Ne. iral and Scenic Area Grant, the specific parcel to be exchanged for the parcel adjacent to the Saga Hill Park area, and the parcel to be acquired through the land exchange. The owner of the parcel is interested in completing the land exchange in the next three to four weeks. Staff has begun working with the City Attorney and the DNR to move forward as quickly as possible. Prior to moving any further, staff needs authorization from the Council to make the land exchange. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to authorize a land exchange through which the City will receive the parcel with PID# 07- 1 17-2324 0036 in exchange for the parcel with PID # 07-117-2324 0031. f J ta8*09i4-« 30.0 ; IQ •: : 0 1 • r? M4%«! 1 2 ' 1 1 1 p«r 'of m 1 1 ''ACfTfO ........jl,. • » 1 * M0M£ PiAtl •»6 *K i4Z 1 ; 1 • (8) p/iiB.y 5 <” 3 fAd^ I • ;: --j(2» ij i •■^ ; * * • • • * *:EZ11111.1_____fe" __ ?«> 1 • eEvefcopPon?L • *• • ~—•- ■-.............- 1 * 1 • 1 • ICK PMt « «35)pAtLK S ms. PA\a \ V 330. TS V/A 37?i /in JJ4J ^ARf Of lot 5S iv( (43) / ?(\\LV 0) »30i.i^ i|' ...... 30 30 V / * - *i»w • .................... *gr-^ ima :;«? ■'■^«*k *tO^‘ / r A ^ . V v.v»'c'*V«? . »2^-^ ' /5>v''-S_.'(371 ft or 49 _H0.? diMi AUG 1 1 2003 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Cl IY Oh ORONO DATE: Attgmt 8,2003 ITEM NO: |5" Department Approval: Nenc Ron Moorse TMc City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City AdminisMot*s Report Item Description: Extinguishment of Conservation and Flowage Easement Over a Portion of the Fieming Trail Addition Property. When the Fleming Trail addition property was detached and annexed from Orono to Long Lake, a flowage and conservation easement was placed over the area of the sewer pond. Mn/DOT has purchased a portion of this property from Long Lake for the construction of the Highway 12 project. The Highway wrill run throuj^ a portion of the property that is covered by the conservation and flowage easement. Mn/DOT is requesting the City approve the extinguishment of the easement over this property. Attached is a map showing the area of the easement to be extinguished. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the extinguishment of the conservation and flowage easement on the Fleming Trail Addition property in the area needed for the Highway 12 project, and to authorize the City Administrator to sign the necessary documents to accomplish this. I -1? 0^. '«'••• • CO < Clumm @1^ WAV ^AI^OifL ILAV@yT •MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION •opogroDhlc Informotlon required! Proposed R/« line i dccess toKInq. Lo» lines i dImensIons. Show north orrow. Outline i locotton of buildings & Improvements. Streets or highway frontoge. C.S. 2713 (12=10) qPIl_ _ _ _ S.P. 2712-75 COUNTY HENNEPIN PARCEL NO. 87A OWNER THE CITY OF LONG LAKE Layout sKetch by LAW Dote 2-26-03 Porcel No. 87a iJ CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register© .......................K««e«38;15AM Page 1 4Ue I 1 200J A ciiub-obono 1 AUGUST 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 RrlmeiyCesh PaidChM 076362 871172003 THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT E 402-48032-441 Licenses & Taxei ($7800) Permit Total THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT ($7800) Void Check 76362 Pm Chk» 076450 8/11/2003 ACCLAIM BENEFITS E 101-41900-489 Other MisceNaneout Charges E101-41900-489 Other Miscellaneous Charges Total ACCLAIM BENEFITS $91.00 337165 $137 75 337166 $22878 COBRA adm 7/2003 FSAAdm 7/2003 Paid ChMI 076451 8/11/2003 AMEM E 101-42110-437 Training & Development $100.00 Erickson E 101-42110-437 Training & Development $150 00 Good 2003 FaH Conference Total AMEM $250.66 PaUChkf 076482 8711/2003 ANDERSON, KRISTI E 101-45200-319 Other Professional Services $168 00 8/4/03 Park Minutes 8MA)3 E 101-41300-319 Other Professional Services $200 00 8/4/03 CC Minutes 7/28/03 Total ANDERSON, KRISTI $365 00 PaidChki 076453 8/11/2003 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SERVICES E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $109 00 6013-332848 Coffee - CH E 101-42110-201 Office supplies $84 80 6013-332846 Coffee • PD E 101-41900-201 Office supples $11040 6013-332847 Coffee - PW ToUl ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SERVICES $273 90 Paid ChMI 076484 6/11/2003 AT « T WIRELESS SERVICES E 601-49400-321 Telephone $9 03 3419397 Cell Phones E 602-49480-321 Telephone $9 03 3419397 Cell Phones E 101-41900-321 Telephone $16 04 3419397 Cell Phones Total AT ST WIRELESS SERVICES $34.10 Pa^ dhk# O7S4&5 8/11/2003 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF E 613-49900-093 Concessions For Resale-Txbi ($11.04) 17362 Credit • Hamburgers E 613-49900-093 Concessions For Resale-Txbl $47.58 19027 Hamburgers E 613-49900-093 Concessions For Resale-Txbl $46 20 19615 Hot Dogs, hamburgers Total AUGIES MOBILE CHEF $82 74 Pak^ Chk# 076486 8/1172003 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO. E 601-49400-403 Repaira/Maint-Mitc Equip $500 74 14425 Brine Inlet • Nav Water Total AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO.$500 74 Paid Chk# 076457 8/11/2003 BANYON DATA SYSTEMS E 101 1900-401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip $2,121.16 10440 Annual Software Support E 601-49400-401 Repairs/Maint-Ofrioe Equip $173 78 10440 Annual Sothme Support E 602-49450-401 Repairs/Mamt-Offtce Equip $52128 10440 Annual Software Support ToUl BANYON DATA SYSTEMS $2,816 16 PaMChkf 076486 6/11/2003 BKV GROUP E 428-48948-304 Engineenng-Contulting $2,210^ 20801 Navarre Fit Station Total BKV GROUP $2.210 00 Paid 6hMi 0>^i9 ^11/2003 BUDGET PRINTING E 101-42110-201 Office suppket $212 39 27380 Envelopes. Letterhead Total BUDGET PRINTING 1212.39 ’Paff 1/1T/2003 CENTER POINT ENERGY-OC i 1 > I 1^ is [LjiiL CITY OF ORONO 08A)8A)3 8:15 AM Page 2 *Check Detail Register® AUGUST 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment E 613-49830-361 Gat & Electric Total CENTER POINT ENERGY-GC $15 98 539004161700 Gas Servica-GC $1598 Paid Chki 076461 8/11/2003 CENTERPOINT ENERGY E 602-49450-381 Gas & Electric E 101-42110-381 Gas & Electric E 101-41900-381 Gas & Electric E60M9400-381 Gas & Electric E 101-41900-381 Gas & Electric E 602-49450-381 Gas & Electric E 601-49400-381 Gas & Electric Total CENTERPOINT ENERGY $2352 $42 13 $47.02 $7.84 $51.49 $12.81 $292 46 $477 27 • • I 6750600 Gas Servico 060006750600 Gas Servico 060006750600 Gas Service 060006750600 Gas Service 060006750600 Gas Service 060006750600 Gas Service 060006750600 Gas Servk» Paid Chic# 076462 8/11/2003 CHAMPION AUTO STORES E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories ToUl CHAMPION AUTO STORES $^636 D209704 $5536 UoMKit f^aid Chki 076463 8/11/2003 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $54 48 24043 Oil Chg. Bulbi197 E 101-421KMC2 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $31 24 24058 Oil Change • 192 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $4995 24073 Align -194 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $2800 24083 Clean Radiator • #193 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $1.103 53 24096 Brake. Ban Jnts #191 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $33 48 24118 Oil Change #196 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $167 34 24132 Battery # 191 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $2864 24134 Mead Light - Cutlass E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $346 89 24141 Oil Chg. BalUoint#190 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $176 96 24145 Oil. Power Steering #185 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $1565 24146 Mount Tire #195 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $2100 24172 Light Bar #196 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $120.84 24177 Caliper #191 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $2880 24180 Turn Signal #196 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $1440 24209 Led Deck #193 Total CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO $2,221 20 ^aid Chki 076464 8/11/2003 CONSTRUCTIVE IDEAS E 425-48945-304 Engineenng-Consutting $3.240 00 4273 Nav FIra Statton.Const Phase Total CONSTRUCTIVE IDEAS $3.240 00 Paid Chki 076465 8/11/2003 DCA • WIRE ONLY G 101 -21719 DCA/Spending Accounts $662 52 8/6/03 Flex Spend-8«D3 ToUl DCA-WIRE ONLY $662 52 Paid 6nk# 076466 8/11/2003 DELTA DENTAL G 101-21709 Dental Insurance $1.374 05 37220072 DenUI Premiums - 8/2003 G 101-15998 Non-Employee Health Ins $157.90 37220072 DenUI Premiums - 8/2003 ToUl DELTA DENTAL $1,531 95 Paid Chki 076467 8/11/2003 DEPT OF ADM . INTERTECH GROUP E 101-42110-311 Data Processing Communication E 101-42110-321 Telephone E 101-41900-321 Telephone E 602-49450-401 Repairs/Maint-Offloe Equip ToMI DEPT OF AOM - INTERTECH GROUP $37 00 DV03060315 $48 68 W03060600 $114.00 wo306neoo $101.00 W03.O0600 6/2003 PVC Phone Service Phone Service Modem Lines • Scada $30068 Paid Chki 076468 8/11/2003 DEX MEDIO EAST LLC CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 08/08«38:15AM Page 3 AUGUST 2003 Checic Amt Invoice Comment E 613-49830-340 General Advertising ToUl OEXMEDIQEASTLLC $526 20 1558/4062000 Directory Advertising $526 20 ?al3 dlilli 676469 6/11/2003 E.8.O. COMPANY INC. E 602-49450-406 Repairs/Maint-Swrr lines/lifts ToUl E.8.O. COMPANY INC. $298.00 7588 $298 00 Pipe Work-GS6 ^aW dkii# 076470 8/11/2003 EAST 8IOE BEVERAGE E 613-49900091 Beer For Resale ToUl EAST SIDE BEVERAGE $136 00 432239 $136 00 Beer for Resale Paid 676471 8/11/2003 EGAN-MCKAY ELECTRICAL CONTRCTR E 101-43000-408 ContracUd Street Maint. Tout EGAN-MCKAY ELECTRICAL CONTRCTR $320 00 JC3010966 $320 00 Replace Bulb-Hwy 12/OCB PaidCMr# 076472 6/11/2003 ELECTRIC RESOURCE CONTRACTORS E 101-41900-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Orounds E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Mainl-BldOB/Orounds ToUl ELECTRIC RESOURCE CONTRACTORS $1.980 86 32501 $185.90 32608 $2.16676 Install Recepticats Wire Booster Pump 'hU Chks 076473 8/11/2003 ELMER J. PETERSON CO. E 613-49830-404 Repaira/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds ToUl ELMER J. PETERSON CO. $225 00 7/18A)3 $22500 Pump Septic Tank - GC Paid Chki 076474 8/11/2003 ERICKSON, KURT E 101-42110-437 Training & Developmeni ToUl ERICKSON, KURT $18.95 6/4/03 $18W Meals • Chiefs Asssoc Paid Chki 076475 8/11/2003 ESS BROTHERS S SO E 602-49450-227 Utility System Maint Supplies E 602-49450<227 Utility System Maint. Supplies Total ESS BROTHERS A SONS $16721 FF2321 $84.J4 FF2334 $251 35 Rings. Sealant San Lid Paid Chk» 076476 8/11/2003 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO. INC. E 602-49450-227 Utility System Maint Supplies ToUl EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO. INC. $260 39 Paid Chki 076477 8/11/2003 FARNIOK, CORREY E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories Rings $9.98 8/2/03 Water - Applicant Testing Total FARNIOK. CORREY $998 Paid Chki 076478 8/11/2003 FORTIS BENEFITS G 101 -21712 Other Deductions ToUl FORTIS BENEFITS $87S87 4019825-1 $87887 LTD Ins-8/2003 PakJ Chki 076479 8/V *< ,-^3 GALL'S INC. E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories Total GALL'S INC. $1^5 565452180 $158 65 Stinger Lamp Paid bhki b7Si80 6/11/2003 GENUINE PARTS CO. E 613-49830-221 Equipment Parts 6 Accessories E 613-49830-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories E 101-43000-221 Equipment ParU A Accessories E 613-49830-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories E 613-49830-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $1447 747173 Oil Filter $12.08 747261 Oa F^er $14.69 747335 Mirror $44.39 747335 Filters $7 43 747538 Brake Ui710 $4043 747773 Fliers $5 00 747773 Cleaner MIA CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 06/OS/03 81SAM P«9«4 AUGUST 2003 Check Amt invoice CoffimeiH E 613^9830<221 E 10M3000-221 E 101-43000-221 E 613^9830-221 E 101-43000-221 E 10M3000-221 E 10M3000-221 E 602-49450-221 E 602-49450-221 E 60M9400-221 E 101-43000-221 E 101-43000-221 E 601-49400-221 E 101-43000-221 E 602-49450-221 E 101-43000-221 E 101-43000-221 E 101-42110-221 E 101-43000-221 E 101-42400-402 E 101-43000-221 E 101-43000-221 E 101-43000-221 E 602-49450-221 E 613-49830-221 E S13-49830-221 E 10M2110-221 E 602-49450-221 E 101-43000-221 E 101-43000-221 E 101-43000-221 E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories Equipment Parts & Accessories Equipment Parts & Accessories Equipment Parts & Accessories Equipment Parts & Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equ^)ment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Tout GENUINE PARTS CO. $3491 747886 $42.79 748196 $36 20 7482/6 $888 748507 $33 85 748735 $10.00 748992 $98 60 749221 $19 99 749333 $2.11 749511 $61.75 749612 $85 90 749696 $17.51 749697 $58 55 749799 ($9.50) 749842 $58 55 749875 $818 749902 $8 08 750358 $1.89 750444 $14.80 750912 $164.01 750956 $4.24 751047 $16 03 751068 $18 07 751584 $10 85 751827 $81.01 752334 $2.76 752370 $28.72 752557 $13 83 752848 $5 07 754346 $7.70 754359 $10 54 754439 __^$61^^ 754441 $1,155 95 Air Fitters Oil Filters Filter. Shop Supplies Oil. Toerels Filters. Gojo Glove Control 6422 Splash Gaurd Plugs Supplies #712 PS Pump e708 PS Hose 4 LED Str#712 Core Deposit 4 LED Stri712 Clamps, hose Graphite Bulb Plug Alternator - BA2 Trk Connectr Misc Supp&es Connectors Connector Tailpipe, Muffler Adhesive Wiper Blade. Lmp Tr BaU Plugs Plug. Lmp Lamp Air Filter Paid Chk« 076481 6/11/2003 GOLF CAR MIDWEST E 613-49830-403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip Total GOLF CAR MIDWEST $129.82 301535 $129 82 Cart Repair PaidChki 076482 8/11/2003 GOLF CRAFT E 613-49830-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories Total GOLF CRAFT $11900 16954 $119 00 Putters. Net Paid Chk« 076483 8/11/2003 GRAND VIEW LODGE E 101-42110-437 Training A Development Total GRAND VIEW LODGE 11^20 262212 $183 20 Lodging Can/Am Conf-Fischer Paid Chk# 076484 8/11/2003 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE E 613-49830-223 Bldg/Grounds Ma nt. Supplies $127.79 52241 ToUl HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE $127 79 Kiltzan PaKi Chidrb76485 8/11/2003 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TECH DPT E10M1900-329 Other Communications $73.51 23067179 E 101-42110-414 EDP/Communications Equip Rent $1,541.89 23078021 Total HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TECH DPT $1.615 40 Data Base Access Radio Lease 7/2003 Paid Chk# 076486 8/11/2003 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF h CITY OF ORONO ii 08A)aA)3ei5AM Pages 'Check Detail Register® AUOU8T2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment E 101-41600-309 Jail Charges Total HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF $910 77 7/18403 Bookir)g Feet - 6/2003 $910.77 11 Paid Chk# 076487 8/11/2003 HUEBSCH RENTAL SERVICE E 613-49830-404 Repaira/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds $25.66 847606 Mat Service - GC Total HUEBSCH RENTAL SERVICE $25.66 Paid Chk# 076488 8/11/2003 HUMANE SOCIETY OF WRIGHT CO E 101-42110-317 AnimalCare $85.00 7/1/03 Total HUMANE SOCIETY OF WRIGHT CO Impound Fees - 2nd Qtr 03 $85.00 Paid Chk# 076489 87TTS003 INFOTEL PUBUCATIONS E 613-49830-340 General Advertising ToUl INFOTEL PUBLICATIONS $364 45 C522192 2003 Directory Adv $364 45 Paid Clikf 076490 8/11/^003 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $207.00 E 101-42110-240 Small Tools and Minor Equip $554.86 E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $761.48 Total INNOVATIVE OFnCE SOLUTIONS 01JM3522 01JM4115 01JM4115 Chair Mats - Srgts Office Fite Cabinet • Srgts Office Chairs - Srgts Office $1,523.34 Paid ChMI 076491 8/11/200^ INTER-TEL (MCLEOD USA) E 101-42110-401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Acce^sories _____ Total INTER-TEL (MCLEOD USA) $959 97 $314.99 $644.98 1131248 1131248 Phones • Srgts Office Phones • Srgts OfRoe Paid Chk# 076492 8/11/2003 INTOXIMETERS E 101-42110-240 Small Tools and Minor Equip ToUl INTOXIMETERS $692.25 124149 PBTs $692.25 ^aid ifiU 076493 8/11/2003 KEEPERS E 101-42110-226 Clothing & personal equipment Tout KEEPERS $83.90 13052-01 Shirts • Tomcheck $8390 Paid ChkS 076494 8/11/2003 KENNETH N. POTTS, PA E 101-41600-306 Legal-Prosecution ToUl KENNETH N. POTTS. PA $2,391^ $2.39r66' 8/1/03 Prosecutions • 7/2003 Paid dhkl 676495 8/11/2003 KOEHNEN'S AMOCO E 101-42110-212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants ToUl KOEHNEN*S AMOCO $21.10 $2110 34066 Gas #101 Paid Chk# 076496 8/11/2003 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC E 101-42110-403 Repairs/Maint-Misc Equip ToUl KUSTOM SIGNALS INC $162410 $162.40 160921 Radar Repair 8/11/2003 LACAL EQUIPMENT INCPaid Chk# 076497 E 101-43000-221 Equipment ParU 8 Accessories Tout LACAL EQUIPMENT INC $325 54 9840 Svveeper WiiKtow $325 54 Paid Chk# 076498 8/TT/2003 LAKE MTKA CONSERVATION DIST. E 101-41110-433 Memberships & SubscriptK)ns $10,376.14 5/19/03 Total LAKE MTKA CONSERVATION DIST. 3rd Qtr 2003 LMCD Levy $10.376 14 Paid Chk# 076499 8/11/2003 LOGIS E 101-42110-329 Other Communications E 101-42110-310 LOOIS-Applications $159 00 $1,643.00 23149 23149 lnUmett/2003 Potioe Records - 6/2003 ' CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register© 08A)8A)3 8:15 AM Pages V AUGUST 2003 Check Affit Invoica Comment E 101-41900-329 Other Communications $159.00 23149 Internet 6/2003 E 101-41900-311 Data Processing Communication $30.0023149 Henn Cty Connection E 101-42110-401 Repairs/Maint-OfRce Equip $6375 23196 Innoculan Updates E 101-41900-401 Repairs/Maint-Offioe Equip $63.75 23196 Innoculan Updates Total LOGIS $2.118 50 Paid Chk# 076500 8/11/2003 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT E 613-49830-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $59.23 47667 Blades E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $27.09 49079 Chain E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $15.93 49104 Chain E 61349830-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $35.7949213 Chain. OU Total LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT $138.04 Paid Chk# 07^501 8/11/2003 LONG LAKE, CITY OF E 101-42260-318 Fire Services $38,493.0020030002 FiraSaiviu *‘ds4<r2003 Totol LONG LAKEa CITY OF $38,493.00 Paid Chk# 076502 8/11/2003 MAGIC CLEANERS E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $76 86 19840 Blankets-PD Total MAGIC CLEANERS $76 86 Paid Chk# 078503 8/11/2003 MCLEOD USA • PHONE BILLS E 601-49400-321 Telephone $23.23366998 Phone Service E 101-42110-321 Telephone $209.03366998 Phone Service E 101-41900-321 Telephone $487.74366998 Phone Service E 601-49400-321 Telephone $47 40 366998 Phone Service E 602-49450-321 Telephone $3945 366998 Phone Service E 602-49450-321 Telephone $54.19 366998 Phone Service Total MCLEOD USA • PHONE BILLS $861 04 PaBXhki 076504 O 101-15908 Non-Employee Health Ins O 101-21706 Hospitaitzation/Medical Ins 0 101-21706 Hospitalization/Medical Ins G 101-21706 Hospitalization/Medical Ins 0101-21706 Hospitalization/Medical Ins 0101-15998 Non-Employee Health Ins $1.693 92 $9,607.37 $1,006 89 $2,191.74 $8,694 07 $1.894 79 103213102552 Medica High 8A)3 103213102552 Medica High8A)3 103213102552 Medica High 8/03 103213122585 Medica Low 8/03 103213125488 Medica Elect 8A)3 103213125488 Medica Elect 8/03 ToUl MEDICA $25.088 78 Paid Chkd 076505 8/11/2003 MIDWEST ASPHALT E 10 1 -43000-224 Street Maint Materials/Supply $28631 71128MB Patch E 101-43000*224 Street Maint Materials/Supply $429 04 71183MB Patch E 101-43000-224 Street Maint Materials/Suppty $14244 71226MB Patch E 101-43000-224 Street Maint Matenals/Suppiy $166 41 71302MB Patch Tout MIDWEST ASPHALT $1,024 20 PaidChk# 076506 8MT/2003 MIDWEST COCA COLi E 61 3-49900-C92 Soft Drinks For Resale E 813-49900-092 Soft Drinks Fof Resale Total MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTUNO CO $157.00 62454118 $164 15 62464117 Soda for Resale Soda for Resale $321.15 Paid Chk# 076507 8/117003 MIDWEST FUELS E 613-49830-212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants Total MIDWEST FUELS $954 92 20609 Diesel, Unleaded - OC $954.92 Paid'dhka 6HS<^ 8/11/2003 MINNeAPOUS COM ft TECH COLLEGE E101-42U0-437 Training & 0«v«lopnwnt $225.00 03-062 Fitaanna Inat • Tomdiadi CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 08A)8y03 6:15 AM Page? AUGUST 2003 ---------—Check Amt Invoice Comment Totel MINNEAPOLIS COM S TECH COLLEGE $225.00 PaidChMI 076S00 8/11/2003 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY E 101-42110-221Equipment Parts & Accessories $24.37 RI07031264 Medical Oxygen Total MHNNEAPOUS OXYGEN COMPANY $24.37 Paid Chki 076S10 8/11/2003 MN HIGHWAY SAFETY CENTER E 101-42110^37Training & Development $271.00 6/9/2003 LE Driving • Boris Total MN HIGHWAY SAFETY CENTER $27100 Paid Chki 076511 8/11/2003 MN/SCIA E 101-42110-437Training & Development $150.00 Cornick 2003 MN/SCIA Conference E 101-4211CM37 Training & Development $150.00 Erickson 2003 MN/SCIA Conference Total MN/SCIA $300 00 Paid Chki 076512 6/11/2003 MR AUGIES COFFEE SERVICE E 613-49900-092Soft Drinks For Resale $49.50 21563 Coffee ToUl MR AUGIES COFFEE SERVICE $49 50 Paid Chki 076513 6/11/2003 NATIONAL AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER E 101-42110-404Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Orounds $566.63 11525 Sprinkler Syst Repair E 101-41900-404Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Orounds $56662 11525 Sprinkler Syst Repair ToUl NATIONAL AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER $1.13325 Paid Chki 076514 6/11/2003 NAVARRE CITGO E 613-49630-403Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip $2400 5/22/03 Tire Repair E 613-49630-403Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip $20 00 6G0/03 Tire Repair Tout NAVARRE CITGO $44.00 Paid Chki 076515 6/11/2003 NAVARRE HARDWARE E 101-41900-201Office supplies $8.18 119361 Batteries E 601-49400-227Utility System Maint Supplies $10.93 119372 Drop Cloth, Tube E 613-49830-223Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies $1064 119387 Trash Bags. Hardware E 601-49400-227Utility System Maint Supplies $638 119399 Solder Kit E 101-41900-201Office supplies $3033 119533 Flashlight. Bug Spray E 601-49400-227Utility System Maint. Supplies $617 119602 Union. Tube E 601-49400-221Equipment Parts & Accessories $44 70 119646 Torch Kit E 601-49400-227Utility System Maint. Supplies $11.60 119858 Mini Tubing E 101-43000-221Equipment Parts & Accessories $24.22119861 Paint E 101-43000-221Equipment Parts & Accessories $6.48 119901 Halo Bulb E 101-41900-223Bldg/Grounds Maint Supplies $1489 119931 Ant Traps E 602-49450-227Utility System Maint Supplies $3 81 119951 Wet/On Cement E 602-49450-227Utility System Maint. Supplies $8.95 119957 Caulk E 101-43000-221Equipment Parts & Accessories $17.31 119971 Bulk Wire E 101-42110-221Equipment Parts & Accessories $1.96 120345 Hooks E 602-49450-223Bldg/Grounds Maint Supplies $3 06 120437 Grass Seed E 101-42110-201Office supplies $1809 120497 Power Strip E 613-49630-223Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies $29 05 120766 Pot. Phone Cord Etc E 101-43000-221Equipment Parts & Accessories $10.10 120920 Bit E 101-41900-201Office suppi es $22 34 120926 Batteries E 613-49630-223Bldg/Grounos Maint Supplies $31.22 121061 Trash Bags. Bug Spray E 613-49630-223Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies $851 121062 Pamt E 101-45200-223Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies $1063 121131 Roundup E 602-49450-221Equipment Parts & Accessories $21.20 121161 Paint E 613-49630-223Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies $1063 121166 Wtr Can. Trasrx4ntr E 601-49400-221Equipment Parts & Accessories 111.17 121211 Ext Cord ,«• CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® Oa/08/03 815 AM Pages AUGUST 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment E 10M1900-201 E 10M3000>221 E 602-49450-227 E S02-49450-221 E 602-49450-227 E 601-49400-227 E 601-49400-227 E 601-49400-221 E 601-49400-221 E 101-42110-221 E 101-43000-221 E 101-42110-221 E 101-43000-221 E 613-49830-223 E 101-42110-221 E 613-49830-223 Office supplies Equipment Parts & Accessories Utility System Maint. Supplies Equipment Parts & Accessories Utility System Maint. Supplies Utility System Maint. Supplies Utility System Maint. Supplies Equipment Parts & Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Equipment Parts A Accessories Bktg/Orounds Maint Supplies Equipment Parts A Accessories Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies Total NAVARRE HARDWARE $6.05 $14.26 $637 $4.57 $7.22 $3.82 $2.97 $2.97 $12.76 $17.87 $21.25 $1.69 $17.83 $5.84 $60.64 $9.13 121554 121613 121646 121702 121703 121733 121734 121857 121883 121908 121972 122107 122271 122425 122514 122681 Dishsoap Nuts/BolU Test Plug Trowel Mortor Mix Ceramic Fuse Battery Bushing Marking Paint Padlock Bug Spray Key Grass Seed Hardware. Light Bul>s Surge Prot Cord Coupling, Nipple $57801 Paid Chki 076516 8/11/2003 NCPER8 GROUP UFE INS G 101-21710 Life Insurance ToUl NCPER8 GROUP UFE INS $272.00 6732803 PERA Life-6/2003 $272.00 Paid Chki 076517 ^11/2003 NEIL NELSON A ASSOCIATES E 101-421 1(M37 Training & Devetopmenl Tout NEIL NELSON ft ASSOCIATES 5750J0 173 $750.00 Search A Seizure Training PaMChk* 076518 8/11/2003 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS E 101-42110-321 Teleplione $1,050.73 506573311-02 Police Cell Phones Total NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS $1,050.73 Paid Chki 076519 8/11/2003 NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE E 101-42110-437 Training ft Oavalopment $40.00 4617 Radar Cert • Russeth Total NORTH MEMOlUAL HEALTH CARE $4000 Paid Chki 076520 8/11/2003 NORTHERN E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $159.74 8483749 Speyer Total NORTHERN $159.74 Paid Chki 076521 8/11/2003 OFFICE DEPOT E 101-42110-201 Off ce supplies $159.74 211109135 MS Publisher E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $159.74 211109135 MS Publisher E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $115 36 211109135 Offloe Supplies E 101-42110-201 Office supplies $9441 211109135 Office Supplies E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $341 211109135-00 Offioa SuppKaa Tout OFFICE DEPOT $53268 Paid dhk« 078522 8/11/2003 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC. E 613-49900-093 Concessions For Resale-Txbl $13.86 6001041 Chips for Resale E 61349900-093 Concessions For Resale-Txbt $17.64 6001155 Chips for Resale Total OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.$31.M Paid CM(t 078523 8/11/2003 ORONO ROTARY E 101-42110-433 Memberships A Subscriptions $110.00 7/9ff)3 Rotary 7/03-0A)3 ToUl ORONO ROTARY $110 00 a Paid Chki 076524 8/11/2003 OTTEN BROTHERS • E 101-43000-224 Siraal MainL Matariata/Supply $92.55 7/29X»Sod I CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 0M8A)3 8:15 AM Pages AUGUST 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment ToUl OTTEN BROTHERS Paid ChMPb76525 8/^ I/2603 PEPSI-COLA $9255 E613-4990(H)92 Soft Drinks For Resaie Total PEPSI-COLA $147.50 50807335 Soda for Resale $147.50 Paid Chki 076526 8m/2003 PERRY'S TRUCK REPAIR E 101-42110-319 Other Professional Services Total PERRY'S TRUCK REPAIR PaidCh $89.55 10097 Tow 5/17/03 $89.55 iki 076527 8/11/2003 PIONEER E 101-42400-340 General Advertising E 101-41900-352 Printing & Publishing Total PIONEER $173.13 $780.08 701 720 Applications Pub Financial Statements $95321 Paid Chki 076528 8/11/2003 PIRTEK E 602-49450-403 Repairsftyiaint-Misc. Equip E 101-43000-403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip Total PIRTEK $100 00 $99.75 PL19870 PL19870 Hoses • Vactor/Backhoe Hoses - Vactoc/Backhoe $199.75 PaidChk# 076529 8/11/2003 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC. E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds $284.60 62135 Spot Mowing - Prairie Total PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC.$284 60 Paid Chki 076530 8/11/2003 QWEST E 613-49830-321 Telephone ToUl QWEST $5946 9524739904 $59 46 Phone Servioa Paid Chki 076531 8/11/2063 REED VENDING E 613-49900-093 Concessions For Resale-Txbl $73 55 4024 Snacks for Concession E 613-49900-093 Concessions For Resale-Txbl $122.00 4039 Snacks for Resale Total REED VENDING $19555 Paid Chki 076532 8/11/2003 RICKS SUPERVALUE E 613-49830-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $60.68 7/16/03 Bug Spray E 613-49830-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $37.56 8/4A)3 Bug Spry. Napkins Total RICKS SUPERVALUE $98.24 Paid Chkb 076533 8/11/2003 SAFETY SIGNS E 602-49450-406 Repairs/Maint-Swr lines/lifts $1.50 02 30439 Traffic Control • Ctry 15 Main Total SAFETY SIGNS $1^.02 Paid Chki 076534 6/11/2C03 SBC PAGING E 101-42110-321 Telephone $40.11 20261008039Police Pagers Total SBC PAGING $40.11 Paid Chki 076535 8/11/2003 SCHARBER S SONS E 613-49830-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories E 101-43000-221 Equipment Pa ls & Accessories Total SCHARBER S SONS $52 38 $2M5 $73 23 2034753 Filters 298926 Mower Parts Paid Chkb 676536 8/11/2003 SEARS E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories ToUl SEARS $14918 $149.18 6^0/03 Tools-Truck 712 Paid Chki 8/11/2003 senior COMMUNITY SERVICES E 101-41800490 Contributions to Civic Org's $4,025.00 6/1/03 Senior Service - 3rd Qtr 03* CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® OS/08/03 8:15 AM P*0e10 AUGUST 2003 —Check Amt Invoice Comment ________ __ Total SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES $4,025.00 Paid ChkO 076538 8/11/2003 SHAUOHNESSY. COLIN E 101-45200-404 RepairsMainl-BldgtASrounds $2,000.00 7/31/03 Park Mowing 6/2003 E 101-45200-404 Repairs/MaInt-Bldgs/GrourKis $2,000.00 7/31/03 Park Mowing 7/2003 Total SHAUOHNESSY. COLIN $4,000.00' Paid Chk« 076539 «11/2003 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS E 101-45200-223 BMgASrounds Main! Supplies $40.45 6/16/03 Clear Wood FInhh Tout SHERWIN-WILLIAMS $40.45 Paid Chk* 0>6^6 6/11/2003 SIGNS OF THE SEASON E 101-42400-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $25560 1297 Magnetic Car Signs Tout SIGNS OF THE SEASON $255.60 Paid Chki 076541 6/11/2003 SNYDER DRUG STORES E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $87.59 6A)3/03 Batteries. Bug Spmy E 602-49450-201 Office supplies $15 95 6/25/03 Phot Album - Serf E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $1915 6/27/03 Batteries E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $25 39 7/11/03 Film E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $53 60 7/25A)3 Film Total SNYDER DRUG STORES $201.68 Paid Chki 076542 8/11/2003 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC E 101-43000-212 Motor Fuels 8 Lubncants $25 01 0930943030 Gas #422 Total SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC $25,01 Paid Chki 076543 6/11/2003 STA-SAFE LOCKSMITH E 101-41900-404 RepairsA4aint-Bldgs/Grounds $l»41 14666 Lock Repair Total STA-SAFE LOCKSMITH $12041 Paid Chki 076544 6/11/2003 8TREICHERS E 101-42110-226 Clothing & personal equipment $64.81 361233.1 Traffic Vests E 101-42110-226 Clothing & personal equipment $8509 361681 1 Belts • Anderson E 101-42110-226 Clothing & personal equipment $13 85 362633 2 Name Tag • McNichois ToUl STREICHERS $163.75 ^aid Chk« 076545 8/11/2003 STS CONSULTANTS LTD. E 425-48945-304 Engineering-Consulting $1,161.35 245629 Nav Fire-Grading Utility Total STS CONSULTANTS LTD.$1,181 35 Paid ChKe 076546 8/11/2003 THE HOME DEPOT E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $190 59 248484803605 Tool Box-Utility Trk ToUl THE HOME DEPOT $190 59 Paid Chki O^diu? 8/11/2003 THORPE DIST CO. E 613-49900-091 Beer For Resala $69 50 304633 Beer for Resale E 613-499004)91 Beer For Resale $126 60 305485 Beer for Resale Total THORPE DIST CO.$19610 l^aidCfiki 07654A 8/11/2003 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE E 101-41000-322 PosUge $1.800 00 89549067 Postage fbr Motor Tout UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE $1,860.00 PaiddhlJ 676^49 i/ll/2003 VERI20NWIRELESS E 602-49450-321 Telephone $31.67 1003-4585141 UWty Cel Phone E 601-49400-321 Telephone $3168 1003-4585141 iMMy Cell Phone • • ■. CITY OF ORONO OaXMnS 8.15 AM Pag*11 *Check Detail Register® AUGUST 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment E 101-41900-321 Telephotw Total VERIZON WIRELESS $395.15 1003-5922058 CoH Phones $458.50 PaW Chk# 070580 8/11/2003 VILLAGE CHEVROLET E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts S Aooassodes E 101-43000-221 Equipmant Parts A Accessories E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts S Accessories E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts S Accessories Tout VILLAGE CHEVROLET $70.69 11136 $14.30 6760 $66.35 8267 $7069 9257 Conneohxs Pipe Assembly Switch ConnectofS $222.03 PaMChM 076551 8/11/2003 WAGERS E 101-42110-201 Omce supplies $146 54 015672 Toner-POtet Total WAGERS $146 54 PaM ChM 076SS2 8/11/2003 WEST LAKE SALES E 101-42110-570 Office Equip and Furnishings ToUl WEST LAKE SALES $4.05331 23876 Seargents Office Furniture $4,053.31 PaMChMI anV2003 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC E 602-49450-381 Gat & Electric E 101-43000-381 Gas & Electric Total WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC $21.19 3113009200 $2964 3113009200 Electrical Seiviot Electrical Servica $50 83 Paid Chkf 078554 8/11/2003 XCEL ENERGY E 602-49450-381 Gat & Electric E 601-49400-381 Gat & Electric E 101-41900-381 Gat & Electric E 101-43000-386 SUeet Lighting E 101-42110-381 Oat & Electric E 101-43000-381 Gat & Electric E 101-42110-381 Oat & Electric E 813-49830-381 Gat & Electric E 101-45200-381 Gat & Electric Totol XCEL ENERGY $1.635 94 $4.24831 $1.42884 $1.31322 $68967 $435 20 $942 $887.09 $22.76 118059677721 118059677721 118059877721 118059877721 118059877721 118059877721 118059877721 118059677721 118059877721 Etectricat Service Electrical Service Electrical Service Electrical Service Electrical Service Electrical Service Electrical Service Electrical Servloa Electrical Servioa $10.67045 10100 Primary Cash $146.890 05 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 402 MUNICIPAL ST AID ST CONSTUCT 425 NAVARRE FIRE STATION PROJ FUND 601 WATER OPERATING FUND 802 SEWER OPERATING FUND 613 GOLF COURSE 10100 Primary Cath $125.11660 ($7500) $6,631 35 $5.895 49 $4.09241 $5,229.20 $148.890 05 Entry Account 1 010001189500 2 020001522000 3 020005318501 4 010001266500 5 010004371300 6 020006135001 7 010004346800 8 020008228500 9 010001223000 10 010005249000 11 010007363500 12 020008131000 13 010001358500 14 010001247400 15 020002092001 17 020001024001 18 020006136600 19 020007025000 20 020001054000 21 020002445000 22 020007012500 23 010001327500 24 020007008000 25 010001283500 26 020002094500 27 010001379900 28 010005267000 29 020002344400 30 010004363500 31 020005417500 32 010005032500 33 020001133501 6069900• rA* • • 36 010007211200 CITY OF ORONO 0a«6A)38:16AM Entry Register Amount Servic# Address 080403B $7,931.47 $7,931.47 $149.72 1895 CONCORDIA ST $103 62 3220 BOHNS PT LA $103.62 3165 NORTH SHORE DR $162 02 2665 CASCO PT RO $149.72 3713 LIVINGSTON AVE $103 62 1350 RESTPTRO $173.37 3468 LYRIC AVE $103.62 2285 WEBBER HILLS RD $171.22 2230 BAYVIEWPL $237.87 2490 OLD BEACH RD $162.62 3635 TOGO RD $103 62 1310 VINE PL $179 65 3585 CRYSTAL PL $147.57 2474 CARMAN ST $103.62 920 DAKOTA AVE $10362 240 CYGNET PL $103.62 1366 RESTPTRO $103.62 250 TONKA AVE $103.62 540 BARRETT AVE $103 62 4450 FOREST LAKE LOG $111.91 125 SMITH AVE $162 62 3275 CARMAN RO $103 62 80 SMITH AVE $164 77 2835 CASCO PT RO $103 62 945 FOREST ARMS LA $149 72 3799 CASCO AVE $171 00 2670 MAPLERIOGE LA $111.91 3444 EASTLAKE ST $156 17 3635 LYRIC AVE $103 62 4175 NORTH SHORE DR $146 80 325 NORTH FERM>ALE RD $10362 1335 BRIAR ST $103.62 699 MTKA HIGHLANDS LA $208 55 2112SUOARWOOODR AcctBsl Nam# rw»r*. « -V ^ Page 1 Chsck $149.72 SUNDSTROM. BRIAN P. $103 62 TRAPENESE. ALBERT $103 62 TRAPANESE. ALBERT $162 02 SHUTTS. CARL R $149.72 HUNTINGTON. CRAIG $103 62 GRABILL. LARRY $173.37 MURRAY. EDWARD L $103 62 PEDERSON. DENNIS G $171.22 SCHNECK. JEFFREY L $237.87 LUZAICH. RICKAR08GAIL $162 62 SCHOMMER. MARY $103 62 SHIELDS. MICHAEL R. $179 65 LANGE. EVELYN J. $147.57 EDWARDS. WARD E. $103 62 GAWRON. LECH $103 62 DETERLING. EUGENE C. $103 62 LANGHAUS. JAK^S $103 62 BRIGGS. GERALD L $103 62 JAFFRAY. VICTORIAAROBERT $103 62 WOLFF. ROBERT L $111.91 HORNER. BRADLEY J. $162 62 HALLADAY. HENRY $103 62 MCMILLAN. TAMMIS $164 77 IVERSEN. ROSEMARY C. $103 62 IVERSEN. ROSEMARY $149 72 IVERSEN. ROSEMARY C. $170 46 LITTLE IV. PHILIP $111.91 MONGE. DEAN A. $15617LAmN.DEANW. $103 62 MAXFIELD. ANN M. $14t 80 MURPHY. ALBERTA I. $103 62 PRINTUP JR.. GARY S10362OAOBAW.lAWmENC6W. ■ t20iS6 8ERO,KAm. CnHy "~36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 48 47 48 49 90 51 52 53 54 55 56 AccoufH 010004359600 020007140500 020001339000 010005242000 020007475000 020005320200 020001344000 020005446500 010004357700 020005138700 020001392500 020001026100 020004183000 010005261000 020007097900 010002276500 010001277300 020005318900 010004348800 020005159000 000004322500 Amount Sorvico AddrtM $132 52 3596 LIVINGSTON AVE $111 91 1405 SIXTH AVE N $103.62 3390 BAYSlOE RO $149 72 2420 OLD BEACH RO $219.53 4750 TONKAVIEW LA $103.62 3202 NORTH SHORE DR $103 62 3440 BAYSlOE RO $103.62 4465 NORTH SHORE DR $695.03 3577 LIVINGSTON AVE $103.62 1387 ORONO LA $103 62 3925 CHERRY AVE $103 62 261 CYGNET RL $103 62 1830 LAKEV1EW TER $184.12 2610 MAPLERIDGE LA $103 62 975 TONKAWA RO $149 72 2765 ETHEL AVE $329.77 2773 CASCO PT RO $111.91 3165 NORTH SHORE DR $83.59 3488 LIVINGSTON AVE $103 62 1550 NORTH ARM DR $158 32 3225 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT $7,931.47 FILTER: [Batch Name] * "080403B* AcctBalNanw Pag«2 Chwk 1132 52 REOER. HARVEY O. $111.91 CROTTEAU. JOHN V. $103.62 HUBER. BARBARA J. $149.72 ROHMANN. WALTER A. $215.53 PALMER, RALPH W. $103 62 LABATT, ROBERT O $103.62 ZIESMER, TOGO M. $103.62 THEISEN, BARBARA $695 03 BALTER. ELIZABETH J. $103.62 MOEN, DOUGLAS $103 62 SIMON. JENNIFER $103.62 DALE. MICHAEL P. $10362 OWINGS. LORRAINE $184.- KNIGHT. CHARLESAPHYLUS $103 62 LUNOQUIST. DAVID $149.72 LILE. DONNA $329.77 LARSON. REED $111.91 AANESTAD. JONATHAN R. $167 18 DOSHAN, DANIEL P. $103 62 PELTOLA. MARGARET $203 23 LARSON. JOHN T. i r 1 CITY OF ORONO otnwiJMm Pagal check register dwell Numbtr Employ** Nam*P*flod Chock Amount Oat* Chock Static 053220 053221 053222 053223 053224 PETERSON. BARBARA MOORSE. RONALD J. SAN8EVERE. ROBERT K. MURPHY. JAMES L WHITE. JAMES M. $323 22 $346.31 $269.36 $269 36 $269.36 6/11/03 Outstanding 6/11/03 Outstanding 6/11/03 OutsUnding 6/11/03 Citstandiog 6/11/03 Outstanding $1,477.61 T CITY OF ORONO 08/0aA»7:04AM P«g«1 chock rogistor Check Numbof Employe Namo DODGE. RACHEL M. LESKINEN. DENISE M. SILUS. BARBARA G. ANDERSON. BRUCE L. ARNESON. JOSHUA A BOBZIEN. SUE A. BORIS. SCOTT W. BUDIG. STACIE M. CARLSON. MICHAEL B. DEMBOUSKI. JAYC. ERICKSON. KURTR FARNIOK. CORREY L FISCHENICH.DANT. JOHNSON. JEFFREY MADSON. ADRIENNE M. MCNICHOLS. DAVID L MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES PERSELL. WILLIAM R. RUSSETH. KYLE M. TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F. TOMCZYK.MARKW. WITTKE. ANTHONY A. HERMAN. JOHN R. LEE. JOSEPH P. FOTH. MELANIE C. GAFFRON. MICHAEL P. MABUSTH. JEANNE A. MEYER. WILLIAM C. OMAN. LYLE E. VANG. BRUCE L. WAATAJA. JANICE J. BRINKHAUS. JOHN F. GREGORY. JAMES D HANSEN. STEVEN OBRIEN. RANDY L PALMER. GREGORY A. RATHBUN. BARRY J. SKREEN. DALE S ABRAHAMSON. FRED W. HAMBRO. MARSHALL J. JENSEN. RODNEY W MARSELLA. DAN G. MCINTYRE. WILLIAM E OAS. DANIEL O. PEICKERT. GARYJ. POLLEY. MIKE A. ROSS. JOHN A. SMYTH. KATHERINE R STEFFENHAGEN. RONALD STORK. JOHN T. MOORSE. RONALD J VEE. LINDAS KUEHN. THOMAS M. OLSON. RONALD J. PETTIT. SANDRA K. ANDERSON. BRUCE L BOBZIEN. SUE A BORIS. SCOTT W. BUDIG. STACIE M. 053170 053171 053172 053173 053174 053175 053176 063177 053178 053179 053180 053181 053182 053183 053184 053185 053186 053187 053188 053189 053190 053191 053192 063193 053194 053195 053196 053197 053198 053199 063200 053201 053202 053203 053204 053205 053206 053207 053208 053209 053210 053211 053212 053213 053214 053215 053216 053217 053218 053219 001000 001001 001002 001003 001004 001005 001006 001007 001008 Pay Cheek Ch«ck Ptrlod Amount Data Chack Slatua 16 $1.038 97 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $964 72 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $469 94 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $598.39 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $989 84 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $78318 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $1.505 35 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $637.60 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $563 16 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $1,575.00 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $1.623 33 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $1,601.05 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $1,647.91 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $1,561.97 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $619 25 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $631.90 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $1,697.80 8/6/03 . tstanding 16 $52809 8/6^3 Ou.' anding 16 $1,264.99 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $39278 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $1.46955 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $1.384 56 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $359.23 8/6A)3 Outstanding 16 $371 55 8/6/03 Outstanding 1C $1.12381 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $1.41939 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $760 53 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $62255 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $16255 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $1.31361 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $1,258.37 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $1.386 03 8/6A)3 Outstanding 16 $1.063 92 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $41750 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $973 12 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $741.01 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $1.11395 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $1.06505 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $149 69 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $94 34 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $215 64 6/6/03 Outstanding 16 $341 21 8/6A)3 Outstanding 16 $239 50 6/6/03 Outstanding 16 $6228 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $391 45 Outstanding 16 $96 92 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $153 77 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $154 57 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $1.377 35 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $314 34 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $2.23592 6/6/03 Outstanding 16 $1.24361 8/6/03 Outstanc: ng 16 $1,337.77 8/6/03 Outstana ng 16 $1,163 82 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $1.06357 8^3 Outstanding 16 $1.135 00 6/6/03 Outstandkig 16 $110.00 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $2000 8/6/03 Outstanding 16 $40 00 8«/03 Outstandktg MUM CITY OF ORONO IM/d8«37:04AM Pag«2 clwck raglttiir Chock Numlwr Employt# Nam« Pay Ptdod Chacic Amount 001009 001010 001011 001012 001013 001014 001015 001016 001017 001018 001019 001020 001021 001022 001023 CORNICK. JAMES L FISCHER. CHRISTOPHER K. OOOO, STEPMANYR. MCNICHOLS. DAVID L SCHOENHOf F. JOHN B. TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F. BOLTERMAN. MATTHEW A. QAFFRON. MICHAEL P. QAPPA.GREOORYA OMAN. LYLE E DEBAERE. DONALD L. HANSEN. STEVEN OBERAIGNER. SCOTT G PALMER. GREGORY A. RATHBUN. BARRY J. 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 11.925 07 $1,520.55 11.941.39 $875.00 $1,617.67 $900 00 $1.096 45 $125 00 $1,610.96 $1.400 00 $1.029 22 $77500 $1,037.63 $350.00 $200.00 $66,766.19 ^ .• ilMi ChtcIc Data Cfiack Statim 6/6/03 Outstanding 6/6/03 Outstanding 8/6/03 Outstanding 6/6/03 Outstanding 6/6/03 Outstanding 8/6/03 Outstanding 6/6/03 OutstancSng 6/6/03 Outstanding 6/6/03 Outstanding 6/6/03 Outstanding 6/6/03 Outstanding 6/6/03 Outstanding 6/6/03 Outstanckng 6/6/03 Outstanding 8/6/03 Outstanding ism ibl INFORMATION items 4 5 COUNCIL MEETING , Cai..— m t < 200} OF cn V UK (MONO % % Wi }■ 00 -m. '''s'V //fo o gpwi \\ I GlTYoT NO Municipal Ofliccs mio' SmtlMirttt; 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 ■aiiiag Miraii! P.O. Bw 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323^ July 22,2003 Dear Neighborhood Residents; The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a proposed subdivision development in the City Medina adjacent to the Orono City limits. This proposed development is located west of Willow Drive between the Orono City Limits and the existing Medina Momingside development. The existing Medina Momingside Development was developed in the 1960 ’s and has eighty l/3*acre lots with both municipal sewer and water. Municipal water service is provided from wells located in the existing development. Sanitary sewer service is provided by the City of Orono via a sewer force main that discharges into a gravity sewer adjacent to the high school. This proposed new subdivision contains twenty-one 3/4-acre lots on 22 acres, and the property currently has one single family residence located on it. The area in the City of Orono adjacent to this development is zoned for a 2-acre dry buildablc minimum lot size with private wells and septic systems. The City of Medina has nxeiyed a p reliminary plat application for this project. The Public Hearing pty h^apglication isl^OT for the Medina Planning Commission meeting on p.in* The Orono property ON\iters in the vicinity of the proposed development property should also receive notification of the public hearing from the City of Medina. cSl The Orono City Council discussed this issue at their July 14* meeting and is interested in any conmients that the neighborhood residents in this area may have. A copy of the Council memo from the meeting is enclosed for your information. The Council directed City staff to notify the Orono property owners in the vicinity of this proposed development and provide them information regarding this project. We are interested in obtaining input from neighborhood residents regarding this proposed subdivision. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please contact us at 952-249-4600 with any comments you may have regarding this project. Sincerely; Greg Gappa Director of Public Services IkkpiMSM (fS2) ttm • Fai (9S2) 24Mil4 •.* •