HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990 Notice of Council Actioncm or <»oiio
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
473-7357
APPLICBTZOH MO.
BOnCB OF COUNCIL ACTION
Date of Notice: 7/16/90
COPIB8:John Woscik
3310 Bayside Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
TIPS OF AFPUC&TIOMt Administrative Appeal
DATE or HBPTIWi July 9, 1990 VOTE: 2 For 1 Against
COOECIL ACTIOB - MOTXOEs
Tabled until the Council meeting of July 23, 1990 (7:00 p.m.). Please
contact City staff if you have any questions.
If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they
are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the City
Council.
ITiWr
CITY OF OROVO
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357
ROnCB OF COORCIL ACTION
Date of Noticei 7/24/90
TOt John Wojcik
3310 Bayaide Road
Long Lake, NN 55356
COPIBSs
TTFB OF AFFLICATIONt Adalnistrative Appeal
DATS OF NRBTINGi 7/23/90 VOTBt 4 For 1 Against
GOONCIL ACTION - MOTIONS
Council granted your appeal of the septic system codes to allow
expansion of existing bedrooms and addition of a second bathroom. Approval
was granted subject to your signing the document to be filed in the chain
of title of the property, warning future property owners that holding tank
may be necessary if the system fails. (City staff will draft such a
document for your review.)
In order for a building permit to be issued, you must provide a survey
of the property verifying the house location and the location of the
additions. If any of the additions are less than 30* from the east lot
line, you will have to apply for a variance, or revise your plans to meet
the 30' setback.
We would suggest that you hire a surveyor immediately to provide such
a survey. Since the variance application deadline for the August 20th
Planning Commission meeting is noon on July 27th, it is critical that the
surveyor immediately determine whether the additions will meet the 30*
setbacks. If not, you could apply for the variance by noon Friday, appear
at the Planning Commission on August 20th, and anticipate final Council
action on Monday, August 27th. (Applications from the August 20th meeting
would normally go to Council on September 10th, but we will fast-track your
application to the August 27th Council meeting if you wish.)
Please contact Mike Gaffron at 473-7357 if you have any questions. A
copy of the variance application is attached for your use should you need
to apply.
Tos Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
Wxomt Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning s Zoning Administrator
Datet July 19, 1990
Smb^ectt Administrative Appeal, John Wojcik,3310 Bayside Road -
Additional Information
Regarding the request to add a bathroom and expand the size
of the existing bedrooms, there have been a number of past
situations in which the Council limited the degree of improvement
to a property or delayed such improvements until sewer issues
were resolved.
The following are cases in point:
1. Pile #517, Robert Ruber, 3390 Bayside Road - Fall 1979.
The applicant wished to increase this from a 2 bedroom to a
4 bedroom residence. The property contained a substandard
septic system that was functional, but had no alternate
drainfield area. Pursuant to a negative recommendation from
staff, the applicants were able to acquire an adjacent lot
for use as an alternate drainfield site. The Council
approved the addition subject to combination of the adjacent
lot with the residence parcel, requiring no upgrade or
replacement of the existing system until it fails.
2. Pile #533, Steve Curren, 110 Orono Orchard Road - Spring
I960. In this case, the applicant proposed to add a second
bedroom to the single existing bedroom to this house on a
1/3 acre lot. The request which occurred in January 1980
was tabled until the spring of 1980, at which time applicant
was able to do soil testing and found suitable area for a
drainfield addition and alternate site to serve the 2
bedroom house. The variances for the addition of 1 bedroom
were approved.
3. Pile #883, Gary Printup, 1261 Briar Street - January
1985. The applicant wished to add 2 bedrooms and a bathroom
to the existing house on a 1/4 acre lot. Staff review of
the site indicated that there was no way to feasibly upgrade
the existing substandard septic system to accommodate
additional bedrooms. Planning Commission recommended
approval of the additions subject to the Crystal Bay Sewer
Project becoming a reality. The application was held up
from January 1985 until May 1985 pending the decision to go
ahead with the City sewer. Variances were then approved
once sewer construction was confirmed.
T
John Wojcik
July 19, 1990
Page 2
4. Pile #906, S.G. McWilliams, 1120/1130 Willow Drive
South - Spring 1985. The applicant proposed a lot line
rearrangement between two existing substandard residence
parcels. Staff contended that the lot line rearrangement
would leave the westerly parcel with inadequate area for
expansion of the existing septic system should that become
necessary. The subdivision request was delayed
approximately 1 month pending decisions on the construction
of municipal sewers, then was approved upon confirmation
that sewer would be installed.
5. Pile #1341, Todd Ziesmer, 3440 Bayside Road - Pall
1988. The applicant requested a lot width variance to
construct a new residence to replace the existing
deteriorated residence. In this case, applicant submitted
septic testing and design work to show that a primary and
alternate drainfield site existed on the property, and
applicant was allowed to construct the proposed residence
with the use of temporary holding tanka until such time that
a decision was made regarding the installation of sewers in
Stubbs Bay. If Stubbs Bay sewers do not materialize, the
applicant would be required to construct the mound
drainfield system as designed. Currently, the applicant is
maintaining holding tanks and has a pumping contract on file
with the City.
6. Pile #1458, Blake Bichanich, 332 Westlake Street - Fall
1989. The applicant proposed a second story «:.ddition,
increasing the number of bedrooms from one to two. The
proposal required a side setback variance. The existing
substandard system was functioning adequately, and there was
some opportunity for future expansion of that system if the
adjacent commonly owned lot was combined. Council approved
the additions subject to the applicant agreeing to sign an
assessment appeal waiver for the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project,
and applicant was advised that if the sewer did not occur
and the septic system failed at some point in the future,
the applicant would be required to take whatever steps
necessary to provide a functional septic system, up to and
including installation of holding tanks. The resolutions
for this variance have yet to be filed. Applicant is still
attempting to obtain signatures from the Contract for Deed
holders.
7. File #1536, Steve Gardiner, 3770 Bayside Road - Summer
1990. This item will appear on Council's August 13th
agenda. Briefly, the applicant wished to construct a second
story addition to provide a second and third bedroom on this
very substandard lot. Planning Commission initially tabled
the request, indicating to the applicant that they likely
r
John Wojcik
July 19, 1990
Page 3
would reconnend denial unless major plan revisions were
forthconing. The property has a substandard septic system
and cannot upgrade that system to serve a 3 bedroom house.
The applicant subsequently revised his plans to result in no
additional bedrooms and relatively minor modifications to
the existing house, which has resulted in a Planning
Commission recommendation for approval.
There have been a significant number of residential
additions needing no Council review, for which staff issued
building permits conditioned on upgrading or replacement of
septic systems. This is a standard practice, and I would
estimate that we average one such situation per year which is
suitably resolved by replacing or repairing an existing system.
/! V/•. t (4'y
To fSlrt
i