Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03-10-2003 Council Packet
f 1 AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, MARCH 10,2003,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet. ROLL CALL CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approve/Amend « \ 0 200^ APPROVAL OF MINUTES • 2. Regular Council February 24,2003 i oi-OPO n O PRESENTATION 3. Mark Ducharme - Fire Chief, Excelsior Fire District 4. Orono Alliance for Education - Bowman Gray PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Andrew McDermott PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Cvnthia Bremer PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 5. #02-2859 Blake and Mary Bichanich, 332 Westlake Street — Variances 6. #03-2865 Kevin Manley, 1973 Fagemess Point Road - Variance - Resolution * 7. #03-2870 Roberta Vaughn, 205 Tonka Avenue - Long Line Rearrangement - Resolution * 8. #03-2871 Sally and Dan Weatherly, 1214 Wildhurst Trail — After-the-Fact Variances— Resolution MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT 9. Proclamation: Orono High School Hockey Team PUBLIC SERVICE DIRIXTOR ’S REPORT 10. Request for Purchase of NPDES Stomnvater Program Software 11. Accept Quotations for North Long Lake East Sew er CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 12. Pay Requests - Long Lake Fire Station 13. Application and Certificate for Payment No. 10 - Long Lake Fire Station 14. Amend City Recorder Fee Schedule 15. Opposition to Ridgedale Court Closing - Resolution 16. Accept School Resource Officer Training Grant 17. 2002/2003/2004 Police Sergeant Contract V- AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, MARCH 10,2003,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT Public Attendance Meeting Date Ii<^ i t 3_____ MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 24,2003 7:00 o’clock p.m. ROLL The Council met on the above mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Barbara Peterson; Council Members Jim Murphy, Jay Nygard, Jim White, and Bob Sansevere; City Attorney Thomas Barrett; Representing staff were Planning Director Mike Gaffron, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, Public Service Director Greg Gappa, and Recorder Kristi Anderson. Absent was City Administrator Ron Moorse. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:03 P.M. CONSENT AGENDA r'" 0 i ur >(JnO 1. Approve/Amend Items #3,4, 5,6, 7, 8,9,10, 11,12, 13,14,15, 16,17,19, 20, and 21 were added to the Consent Agenda. Nygard moved. White seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES *2. Regular Council Meeting of Februaiy 10,2003 Nygard moved. White seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of February 10,2003 as presented. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS • Andrew McDermott McDermott reported that the Commission had discussed the idea of holding a work session with the City Council during one of the Park Commission's upcoming regular meeting nights and asked the Council to give this thought consideration. Mayor Peterson pointed out that the Council had discussed scheduling a preliminary work session in March, but would be willing to consider the Commission’s first meeting in April. McDermott encouraged the City to go forward and advertise for a new Commissioner. He mentioned that past interest e.xpressed by Mr. Carr, a resident of Orono, may still be worth pursuing. While she appreciated the suggestion. Mayor Peterson believed the new Commissioner should come from an unrepresented area of Orono. Sansevere felt it was proper to advertise. In addition, he wished to clarify his past position to McDermott with regard to the Park Commission. While individually, Sansevere appreciated the representatives’ commitment to the Commission, he indicated that as a group their forceful demeanor frightened him. Sansevere stated that bis number one priority is safety, as in the case of PAGE 1 of 11 ^<1 : MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Mooday, February 24,2003 7:00 o’clock p.m. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS, Continued the Bedenvood play equipment. He felt it was good that the Commission had informed the Council of the treated wood, suggesting its removal. He felt the Commission had acted properly, and supported the suggestion that this matter receives critical attention and the play equipment is ripped out if there is a danger. If there is money to replace it, then the City will do so, if not it may have to watt. McDermott pointed out that, while the EPA has banned the use of treated wood in construction, they have not gone so far as to mandate it be ripped out of existing structures. Gappa suggested the City have the equipment at Bederwood tested for levels. Sansevere reiterated the need for the City Council and Park Commission to be working from the same page. He reminded the Park Commission that they are an advisory board to the Council, recognizing it may have been the Council’s fault, that they ’ve allowed the Commission to become its Qvmfiefdom. At times, the Commission has been telling Council what to spend money on, and if there is a disagreement and Council does not support their recommendation we are bad people who don’t support our kids. Sansevere stated that, in reality, that is simply not the case, it’s generally a matter of the money just not being there. He went on to question the roles within the Commission and encouraged them to rotate Chairs and Co-Chairs. McDermott stated that on several occasions he has asked for volunteers to act as Co-Chairs or the Chair itself to no avail. He indicated that no one has expressed any interest in carrying the additional workload, which has not bothered him to a great degree. Murphy asked what the workload of the Park Commission Chair encompassed. N!cDermott indicated that the workload is made up of creating the agendas, acting as liaison to City staff, and usually attending additional meetings. White felt this would be a good time to share with Chair McDermott that it is unlikely the skating rink in Navarre would come to fruition at this time. He stated that the soil tests seem to be showing that the satellite station would need to be moved further back on the projjerty. McDermott maintained that the Commission had always been in support of the skating facility in front near County Road 15 and questioned what impact moving the station back would have on tins placement. He had difflculty believing that soil could not support merely skating. Murphy believed it was a bit early to get into whether the parcel would support a skating rink or not, since he had only seen the preliminary report from the drillers he could not make any recommendations one way or another, especially in light of the fact that mitigation and construction of a roadway w ould still be necessary. Nygard believed that there were numerous things the City could do to provide entertainment for the kids if they don’t decide to follow thru on skating. He pointed out that, currently, the City of Orono does little to protide activities for our youth and suggested consideration be given to a BMX PAGE 2 of U i MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 24,2003 7:00 o’clock p.m. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS, Continued track, skating, skateboard track, etc. He believed the City could look to Maple Plain's successful BMX track example and other communities, like Mound, regarding boarding etc. Murphy asked how the City would handle liability, as this would be a big issue. Nygard suggested that staff speak to Maple Plain about how they handle that issue with regard to their BMX track. He indicated that moving dirt around to create a BMX area is an inexpensive option. McDermott pointed out that liability often is not an issue as long as you keep the ramps and things under a certain height. White stated that E.xcelsior has a small track off their south lakes trail, which is heavily used. Mayor Peterson maintained that many good ideas exist and that there arc options yet to be discussed. McDermott indicated that he would encourage others to take on the role of Co-Chairs. Mayor Peterson recognized McDermott for his past attempts to bring others into a leadership role and indicated that they could address this further at the work session. Sansevere stated that, given this was his first opportunity to speak to McDermott in person, he hoped that he had expressed his views clearly. Murphy questioned what the purpose of the joint w ork session would be. Mayor Peterson stated that the purpose of the work session will be to make sure both parties are on the same track, recognizing that in the past, the Council has given the Commission ideas and expected them to run w ith them, and they've done a good Job of doing so. To that end, McDermott maintained that having been given direction by the Council to pursue a matter, the Commission has. on several occasions, spent time researching an issue and presenting it to Council, only to have the Council say they no longer have interest in it. He reminded the Council that the Commission is a good dedicated group of individuals with good ideas whom, when given direction, roll with a project and often get shot down. He added that it would be advantageous to have Council liaison's show up for their appointed meetings. PL/\NMNG C03LM1SS10N COM.MENTS - J. Marc Fritzler, Represenlalivc Fritzler reported that all of the Planning Commission items had been on the Council consent agenda for the evening. He pointed out that the Commission's primary goal at their meetings lately has been to get people to justify their hardship. In an effort to do so, the Commission has been trying to limit discussions to 20 minutes, how ever, on many of the applications, the hardship just isn't there and the Commission ends up going back and forth on items. Fritzler maintained that the Commission is striving to reinstill the need to prove a hardship. PAGE 3 of U MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 24,2003 7:00 o’clock p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS, Continued Sansevere asked if this could be streamlined at the application level. Since many applicants have different ideas of what they should be able to do with their property and what they consider a hardship, GatTron indicated that even when staff informs them they don’t have adequate hardship they wish to proceed. Typically, Gaffron stated that by the time an application reaches the Planning Commission, it is in its 3rd or 4th design phase. Nygard pointed out that, if the Council meetings were broadcast, it might be helpful to residents to observe the process before deciding to proceed with an application. They might have a better grasp of what is ^ically allowed in Orono. White indicated that, oftentimes, Orono must compete with what other cities allow, which is a problem when people come to file an application and believe they should get what someone else in another lake community is allowed. Murphy asked if the e.xpectation had changed. Mayor Peterson believed that, in many instances, it has and people believe they should get more. Fritzler pointed out that some owners are getting into trouble assuming that their contractors know what is allowed an'' at they play by the rules, which is not always the case. Nygard maintained that most people have no idea what is allowed or happening until they come in to request an application. Sansevere inquired if staff supplied people with information about what is required, and suggested that a separate sheet be created to emph^ize the need to provide stronger har^hips or the application likely won ’t pass. Gaffron stated that staff has often gone so far as to tell people that their applications have very little chance of passing, and still people wish to proceed. He indicated that what staff needs most is consistency to support their position and to point to when recommending someone not pursue something. Attorney Barrett stated that, while offering and giving advice is good, the City should shy away from totally discouraging individuals from their due process. Staff should provide applicants with advice and recommendations, but Barrett cautioned making it too tough for people to get an application. McDermott suggested they make it a policy that indiv iduals are allowed 20 minutes to make their case. Gaffron stated that, typically, the Commission hears the staff report, they ask for public comment and the applicant ’s comments, make a motion, and discuss it. PAGE 4 of 11 I k MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 24,2003 7:00 o*clock p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS, Continued Fritzler pointed out that some applicants belabor their points, or worse try to badger or intimidate, in order to make their case. White stated that, in his observations, the Commission has been extremely patient and tactful handling difficult cases. Mayor Peterson encouraged the Commission to continue to stick to its 20-minutc limit, since it is unfair to other applicants who are forced to wait until the wee hours to be heard. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1 here were none. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT *3. #03-2872 TERRY & CHRISTY MORSE, 2080 SPATES AVENUE - VARIANCE RESOLUTION NO. 4928 Nygard moved. White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4928, a Resolution granting lot area, width, and setback variances to add a second story for closet space on the most southwesterly portion of the existing principal structure, 20.6’ from the side lot line adjacent to a street where 50’ is required to the property located at 2080 Spates Avenue. VOTE: Ayes 5, Navs 0. 4. #03-2866 JUDY AND DAVID ZOSCHKE - 2040 SHADYWOOD ROAD • VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4929 Nygard moved. White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4929, a Resolution granting lot coverage by structure, hardcover within 75-250* of the lakcshore setback zone, and average lakeshore setback variances to replace an existing 507.6 s.f. lakeside deck, enclosing 151 s.f. as patio area for the residence located at 2040 Shadvwood Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Navs 0. *5. #03-2868 JOHN E. WHITMAN - 1580 SIXTH AVENUE N. - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 4930 Nygard moved. White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4930, a Resolution granting variances to construct a 125 s.f. driveway and pad, located 50’ south of the centerline of long Lake Creek where no hardcover is permitted, and grading, filling or excavating of more than 10 cubic yard within 75* of the Creek where none is permitted, to serve as access to a future home for the property located at 1580 Sixth Avenue N. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PAGE 5 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 24,2003 7:00 o*clock p.m. ♦6. #03-2873 CITY OF ORONO - COMP PLAN AMENDMENT (MUSA) Nygard moved. White seconded, to conditionally approve 2000-2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendment #1 adding certain properties along Old Long Lake Road to the defined Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) subject to review and comment by the Metropolitan Council, and direct staff to submit the amendment to Metropolitan Council. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ^UYOR/CITY COUNCIL REPORT Murphy had two comments, first, he informed the Council that Mn/DOT would be going before the MCWD, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, to get permits for construction and he hoped that their problems could be resolved, but wonied a legal battle could be initiated. Second, while Murphy indicated he understood the purpose of the joint Park CommissioaCity Council work session, he questioned whether the Council, as a whole, understood or agreed upon what its philosophy about parks is. In his opinion, Sansevere believed that everyone currently had differing opinions on the matter and felt they should all get together to come to a consensus. Mayor Peterson admitted that in the Comprehensive Plan it was presumed that the larger lots would provide adequate play space for residents, however, today things are changing and that is no longer the case. Gaffron agreed, but added that strides were being made to recognize and adjust this. He indicated that, while a new survey is needed, the latest survey of what residents want in their community indicated that they desired more trails and open spaces. Mayor Peterson questioned how they could perform a new survey. Sansevere suggested it be set up on-line. As the last sur\ ey was perfomicd by phone and quite lengthy, McDermott argued that likely citizens would use their caller I.D to avoid the calls today. He suggested they attempt to pro\ ide a random selection process so that every Little League supporter doesn't get on line to slant the sur\’ey results towards their ends. Nygard further suggested they initiate a three-prong approach, interviewing park users, phone surveys, and/or the web to obtain a cross section of the community. Murphy questioned w hether there was a strategic plan for parks in place for the next 5-10 years. PAGE 6 of 11 I 0 / MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 24,2003 7:00 o'clock p.m. MAYOR/CTTY COUNCIL REPORT, Continued McDermott stated that, since the last strategic plan, new things have continued to pop up over time, making it difficult to prioritize certain elements of the plan by a timeline. It was agreed almost ten years ago to perform the park surveys every ten years, and McDermott pointed out that some of the parks did have revisit dates attached, like Bederwood which was to be redone in 2012, however, now may need to be revisited sooner than anticipated. Murphy asked when this plan was reviewed last. McDe.mott indicated the plan was due to be reviewed every few years during work sessions. As a relative newcomer, Murphy observed that these were contentious times between the Park Commission and City Council. He believed it to be high time to hold a joint work session, and suggested they happen more often, in an effort to share ideas and eliminate the opinion he had heard that the Park Commission had become its own fiefdom. McDermott reiterated that it is the Council that decides things and gives the Commission direction, the Commission then carries the initiatives forw ard, like the ice rink, and then nothing happens. Sansevere expressed his frustration that the Commission continually asks for money. McDermott pointed out that they are the only group that needs money to replace park equipment etc. He maintained that. City Councils of past, had not done their part to improve the parks, therefore, unfortunately, most of the repairs have fallen upon this Council. He reiterated that past repairs and replacements were put off far too long, and that the Commission has been charged with trying to play catch up with things that were not addressed. Sansevere repeated that the Council has no desire to ignore a safety issue, like the treated wood problem, and is willing to take steps to find the money when a dangerous situation exists. Murphy believed the Council and Commission should be provided with a firework to work from at the work session, containing some review of where they’ve been, what the past strategy has been, the successes/failures, and something to work towards in order to avoid any additional finger pointing. White asked that staff have Moorse create such a document. While Sansevere wished to make this work session a priority, he would be unable to attend if the meeting were held at the April 7,2003 Park Commission meeting. PAGE 7 ofl I MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 24,2003 7:00 o’clock p.m. MAYOR/CITY COUNCIL REPORT, Continued As the most vocal Council member, McDermott suggested that the Commission work with Sansevere to establish a date that would work for him. With regard to the upcoming Afiordable Housing meeting to bi held this Thursday evening, White asked what tormat it would follow. Sansevere indicated that he would prefer an informative round table, versus a Ic :ture. Murphy asked if the Council would be given an agenda of scheduled speakers for the evening to ensure a focus or direction. White indicated that one of the scheduled speakers, Mr. Cramer would be very informative and upfront with the issues. He maintained that Mr. Cramer presents the issues fairly and states both the proponents and oppositions ’ points objectively. Sansevere asked that a question and answer opportunity be allowed. Mayor Peterson agreed that a panel discussion, or 5-10 minute presentation by speakers, would probably be most helpful to the Council with an opportunity for Q&A. As she felt ignorant of the topic, the Mayor stated that it was her intent to learn from thir discussion and gain new information. Sansevere concurred that he wished to learn new things without being spoken at. Murphy suggested that Moorse act as the moderator to ensure a good dialogue. PUULIC SERVICE DIRECTOR’S REPORT *7. SCHEDULE AN ASSESSMENT HEARING FOR NORTH ARM LANE PAVING PRO.IECT - RESOLUTION NO. 4931 and 4932 Nygard moved. While seconded, to approve RESOLUTION NO. 4931, a Resolution declaring the cost to be assessed and ordering preparation of proposed assessment for the North Arm Lane Paving Project. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Nygard moved. White seconded, to approve RESOLUTION NO. 4932, a Resolution for hearing on proposed assessment for North Arm Lane Paving Project. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PAGE 8 of 11 f C I MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 24,2003 7:00 o ’clock p.m. *8. RENEW PARK MOWING CONTRACT Nygard moved. White seconded, to approve the renewal of the park mow ing contract. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *9. PURCHASE REPLACEMENT UTILITY TRUCK Nygard moved. White seconded, to approve purchase of a Chevrolet l*ton truck from Hinckley Chevrolet, Hinckley, Minnesota for $29,500 to be funded as follows; $19,000, Year 2003 Sewer Utility Fund Capital Equipment Budget, and $10,500, Year 2003 Water Utility Fund Capital Equipment Budget As well as, purchase of a utilit}' truck box and hoist from Crysteel Truck Equipment, Fridley Minnesota for $20,000 to be funded as follows; $13,000, Year 2003 Sewer Utility Fund Capital Equipment Budget, and $7,000, Year 2003 Water Utility Fund Capital Equipment Budget. *10. NORTH LONG LAKE E. - SEWER PROJECT Nygard moved. White seconded, to approve a pressure sewer extension project to serve the remaining four properties in East Long Lake Area A at an estimated cost of $16,000 per unit with the understanding that the necessary easements for this project will be provided to the City at no cost, and the property owner at 1145 Sixth Avenue North pays the $64,000 cost for this project unless the City agrees to finance the $4il,000 in costs for three of the units. 11. BID AWARD - EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS BID 2003 Nygard moved, W'hite seconded, to approve the year 2003 Materials and Equipment Bids. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 1 2. WEST FERNDALE ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT - RESOl.UTION NO. 4933 Nygard moved. White seconded, to approve RESOLUTION NO. 4933, a Resolution requesting financial assistance from the State of Minnesota for replacement of the deflcient bridge at West Fernd:.le Road and Browns Bay CbanneL VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT * 1 3. PAYMENT OF MAPLE PLAIN HRE SERVICE COSTS Nygard moved. White seconded, to approve the payment in the amount of $99,096.30 to the City of Maple Plain for fire service provided in the years 2000 through 2002, and to amend the 2002 fire service budget to reflect the additional $7,580.00 expenditure beyond the budgeted amount. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PAGE 9 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 24,2003 7:00 o’clock p.m. *14. WECAN REQUEST FOR SUPPORT OF CDBG FUNDING Nygard moved. White seconded, to approve sending a letter of support from the City regarding the WeCAN for CDBG funding. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. * 15. PAY REQUEST FOR LONG LAKE FIRE STATION Nygard moved. White seconded, to approve the requests for payment as follows: BKV Group in the amount of $1,263.41, and Best Access Systems in the amount of $26.55, to be funded from the Joint Fire Account. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *16. PURCHASE THREE NEW SQUAD CARS Nygard moved, White seconded, to approve acceptance of the new cars from Superior Ford, offer and sell the old cars through competitive bidding, and set up the new cars. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *17. BID AWARD FOR EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES - RESOLUTION NO> 4934 Nygard moved. White seconded, to approve RESOLUTION NO. 4934, a Resolution Awarding the Sale of $75,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 2003, accepting the bid proposal of Anchor Bank, N.A., Wayzata, to purchase the certificates bearing an interest rate of 1.40% per annum at a bid price of par plus accrued interest, if any, to be dated March 17,2003. VOTE: Aves 5, Nays 0. 18. 2002/2003/2004 POLICE SERGEANT CONTRACT Nygard moved, Sansevere seconded, to table discussion of this contract settlement until the next City Council meeting. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. * 19. DESIGNATION OF CITY REPRESENTATIVT TO M('WD Nygard moved. White seconded, to designate Gabriel Jabbour as the City’s official representative to represent the City’s interests in relation to the Mn/DOT permit application for the Highway 12 Project, and regarding other issues of interest to the City that may be addressed at the Februar> 27 MCW'D meeting. VOTE; Ayes 5, Navs 0. *20. UPGRADE AND MOVING OF POLICE OXYGEN SYSTEM Nygard moved. White seconded, to approve the spending of not more than $650 to move and upgrade the oxygen cascade system from the old Long Lake fire station to the new Long Lake fire station by Minneapolis Oxygen Company and to amend the police department budget to reflect the expenditure \^OTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PAGE 10 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 24,2003 7:00 o’clock p.m. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT Attorney Barrett had notliing new to report. *21. LICENSES Kennel License Renewal: I. Robin A. Ktlbane 495 Oxford Road 3. Chris & Erin Tully 1355 North Arm Lane 2. Dennis and Gail Wilder 1331 North Arm Drive 4. Gayle Talbot 80 Luce Line Ridge Special Event 1. Applicant: Peter Erpenbach/Minnesota Distance Running Association Event: Fred Kurz Memorial 10 Mile Run Location; Wayzata Middle School to Luce Line Trail -Approximately 4.5 miles out and back Date: Saturday, April 12,2003 Time: 8:30 a.m. -11:30 a.m. Nygard moved. White seconded, to approve all licenses. \’OTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *22. BILLS Nygard moved, White seconded, to approve pa>ment of the All Funds Account. VOTE: Aves 5, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT Murphy moved, Nygard seconded, to adjourn the Orono Citv Council Meetina of Februarv 24,2003 at 7:58 PJVI. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. » . ATTEST: Linda S. Vec, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor PAGE llofll iMUifgiiiilil REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 7,29^^ \ 0 2003 ITEM NO; 3 o. * < Department Approval: Name RonMoorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: introdnetion of Mark DuCharme, Fire Chief, Excebior Fire Dbtrict Mark DuCharme, Fire Chief for the Excelsior Fire District, is working with the City regarding an agreement for the provision of fire service to the Navarre area for the years 2004 through 2006, and the recruitment and training of volunteer firefighters to staff the Navarre fire station. This is an opporttmity for the City Council to meet Chief DuCharme. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: No action Required. i r ^ 0 20^^ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 1 *-»'■ orlONO DATE: March 7,2003 ITEM NO: ^ Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Lin Vee City Adininistrator ’s Title City Clerk Report Item Description: Orono Alliance for Educatid^ Bowman Gray, representing the Orono Alliance for Education, will attend the March 10 Council meeting to provide information regarding this organization, and to answer any questions the Council may have. The attached infonnation was provided from the Orono Alliance for Education for Council’s review. L.. ■- ^ ::C= :-; :.v: L-= ••■■•:“•,.•• •>■ ■■•-..v :••■':••' V-';/ OWOMO ALLIAWCI FOW IDUCATIOM "A Fotmdation |or CxeeUence" Who arc we? FoumlecI in 2000, by a commiucci Rroup of parents who believed they could and should make a difference in their own backyard, the Alliance's goal is to provide private support of public education in the Orono Public Schools. Due to increased costs and reduceil funding from the legislature and federal government, public school foundations are becoming effective ways for parents to meet their children's public education needs. y,. r Where does your money go? In 2002, we granted $211,716 ti> the Orono Schools to retain 5.75 K-12 teachers whose positions would have otherwise been cut; to fund scholarships for seniors; and to purchase learning supplies awarded by the Orono fklucation Fund. In 2001 . we were able to reinstate World I.anguage at the high school, e.xpand the Challenge Program in the middle school, and improve Music and Athletic programs with a gift to the schools of $260,000! This year, we want to do even more. XH¥Ol¥t9! O o 3 How can you help? Make a financial contribution to our Annual Campaign - go to www.oronoalliancc.org for a pledge form or call the office at 952-545-6873. Volunteer hir phone calling or with special events. Call 952-545-6873. Spread the word to other parents that we have a unique school because of its small size yet huge capacity to produce outstanding academic scholars. Make a difference IN YOUR OWN BACKYARD J.; /• ¥Ik • ,3 ImmkI Nliiiihits Sttsan Bicon ft Alllsoa Laedtkc Co-Pmldtmts Dwight Seward Vice Pmident Sheryl Morrison Trenswrer Jessica Louisiana Secretary Directors Mark Baumann Holly Cashin Mark Donahoe Bowman Gray Robert Hare Draper JafTray Carrie Lee Bradley McKown Howard McMillan III Martha Van de Ven Tom Schcrer Sfudenl Represenfalive Tamara Hauser Lxerulire Director •>52-545-6873 Opbw Allimc« fsr ldhK«ll«n iox211 L0119 Uik«, MN 55356 952-545-6673 P1 •i A i 2 n K ill n S In Your Own Badnard www.oroiioollioiice.org r ORONO ALLIANCE FOR EDUCATION • A Foundation for Excellence ” Statement of Mission The mission of the Orono Alliance for Education is to preserve and enhance the quality of student education by significantly increasing the revenue and other resources available to the Orono Public Schools. Core Vaiues The Orono Alliance for Education, and other affiliated organizations, agrees to the following values as principles in interacting with the Orono school community: 1. Place students' interests as the first priority. 2. Stand in strong support of public education. 3. Support the mission of the Orono Public Schools. 4. Remain neutral, never seeking to influence, set or express a political opinion on district policy. 5. Encourage cooperation and open communications with other organizations that provide direct support to the Orono Public Schools and the general community. 6. Create an atmosphere of inclusion, non-discrimination and equal access. 7. Show open disclosure of operations, except when subject to individual privacy concerns. 8. Abide by high ethical standards. 9. Maintain a long term focus while striving for immediate impact. IJcMf (I Mnnlx I I II (l\u • < ' Seen Din * f.'»' k I >t.|| < ||,»i f(o|n I I M M ht .1 |H I I I I I I .1 S • I M • < 11U [dl( \ \11 K • • II ratti M. Mill.m 'hi s« i.i \ .1II ill \i II Si hi m I rni Ki 1*1» St mmive liiiM .11 INI I rniiM I >111 1 O flr^ ^ iSS!^ Winter 2003 OBONO A lliance For Education **A Foundation |or excellence ’" Mark Your CalendarsI Orono Alliance for Education announces our first Fundraising Event Lorie Line and her Pop Chamber Orchestra at the Orono High School April 24th at 7:J0pm! Gel vmir lie keis now! Pianisi i.orie Line aiul # her orehesira will perform a new repcrioire of music at ihe Orono High School before hilling ihe road for iheir spring lour. “We arc ihrilled lhal Lorie Line has agrccil lo headline our lirsi fundraiser.** said Allison Luedlke. Gala C hair. “M\ daughicr atiends C*irono schools and Lm cxciied lo give someihing back lo ihis se hcH'l disinci,” says Line. *Hiis is someihing I can ilo lor my comimmily and I am really looking loru aril lo perlorming in my luvn backsard. she ailded fliiic \m1I be a pre-show family ilinnci bi ginning ai 7: k' open lo all Orono lamilics. (Hono mnsu snulenis will pro\ide ihe cnlcilainmenl ii. ,i.! .t'.oii. iheic will A Ni|t‘iu aikiioii with I 'bnlons Mems nii displa\ dining ihe ! II ;ci .mil nm imissii>n ol die cmucri. Si*' spec lal t \eni is inii nded lo e ek brale die Orru.i' Piiblk SihooK uul raise nu>ney ii> 'UPjn»rf mit <Melli ni programs liekets ON SALL Monday, I cbruarx lOih at 10:00 a.m. Call 032->43-6130. or purchase on line at wuw.oumoallianie.org Ticket conlnbutimis Iwidi a lax-dediietihle portion) are S30. S30 or SI00. Seating is reselled. so get vom 1 14 kefs rarKl All pi »v ceds liom ihi" <mcrri g«' \o C>rono Alliaiue lor Liliuaiion M y Call The Alliam • o IIk i ai *^>2-343-6873 for more informatkmawWI^V tll^#vrtit or Mbs.Ml I IK iiiki .11 763-476-9493 to volunteer (ticket t^fallrpUcUon .iml n.iN .«! iht (vent food service amt draU^ lielii Mtiled) -^v;IrnMrnrm Dear Friends, 2003 is upon us and time seems to keep accelerating with each year that passes. 1 think it was Andy Rooney who once said, “Life is like a roll of toilet paper; the closer you get to the end, the faster it goes.” In all seriousness, we enter this New Year with good news and bad news. The good news is that the number of donors to the Alliance has doubled; the bad news is that the average size of donation is down considerably. We are only slightly ahead of where we were at this time last year. We would ask that you consider making a gift if you have not already and if you have, give again if you are able. We have set the bar quite high for ourselves given our success in our first two years of granting to the Orono Schools. So far we have granted almost $500,000 to the schools and have built a healthy base in the endowment fund. Each year we tr)’ to do better than the previous and we need your help. Back to the good news, Lorie Line will perform at the High School this April to benefit the Alliance and kick off her next tour. Keep tuned for details regarding tickets. We are looking for some event sponsors, be they individuals or corporations. If you have an interest in helping us put this on, please call our office. There will a silent auction with evcrj'thing from artwork to trips. This will be a great time for all. Lastly, this will be my last letter as President as my term is over. I have thoroughly enjoyed my time and have been moved by the generosity and kindness shown to our organization by the residents and parents of the Orono School District. Nothing worthwhile ever comes easy and the hard work put forth by the board and volunteers has produced results that will be felt by this school for generations to come. I thank you for your support, enthusiasm and for sharing your thoughts with me about how to help make the Alliance a success. Best Wishes, Bowman Gray President \||SS|(t\ S|\||\||\| »I • I • f ill •III I i I I i I. ■ I • • . I I V i •'ill I V I M—Mi.>i BfMctor Take Part - Give Part Founded in 2000, ihc Orono Alliance's goal is to provide private support of public education. Specifically, the mission of the Orono Alliance is to preser\-e and enhance the quality of student education by significantly increasing the revenue and other resources available to the Orono Public Schools. This year our goal is to raise $500,000. We would like to continue to support the basic needs of the Orono schools and to provide enhanced education opportunities to our students. Fundraising events like the upcoming Lorie Line concert in April, spring phone calling campaign and our Alumni Association efforts will help us move toward this goal. As you know our community passed a levy that will be committed to our schools’ total budget. Flowever, the referendum request had to be limited by state law to approximately $*180,000 per year. After two years of extensive budget cuts amounting to almost $1.7 million, our schools still face a shortage of $450,000 this year. We look forward to being able to fund this gap with your help and generous support. Please join us in this challenge during our 2003 Annual Campaign. There is no better investment than the education of our children. Tamara Hmisei Executive Director Did you graduate from Orono? Join the Orono Alumni Association! Gel involved on the ground floor of this group. W’e need help compiling alumni data for the first phase of the directory. Fulure events include an all-school reunion. Coniat l oronoalliance@prodigy.nel to join. huger (luin yourself ^Bdi hara Hus/i TNANK YOU I On bnlNilf nff IW itndnnto m§ Owmm mmd Mm MiMra tclinnl finmlty^ •«r appmcInMnn t« Mm fnUnwint fnr MMlr Jnllf 1, 2002 - DMMbnr 31, 3003 •M0PO3TIMG P0N03S SPIRIT (Up To SI 00) Robert and Lesley Anderson Kathryn Cook James and Deb Comick Stephanie Diner Michael and Rita Dornbusch Brian and Barbara Ehalt Gregor)’ and Rosemarie Ehalt Jeffrey Ehrmann Lindsay and Len Freeman John and Angela Gilmore Douglas and Anne Gold Smith Steven and Debra Henthorne Keith and Pauline Jacobsen Suzanne Leja Curtis and Elizabeth Levang Long Lake Veterinary Clinic Thomas and Tammy Lowery Michael and Mary ’ McElligott Thomas and Judy Micke Edward and Lillian Miller Robert and Teresa Minkema David and Brenda Osborne Bette Jo Perl Connie Pricsz John and Janice Reiser Tina and Wint Ritchie Joel and Sarah Settles Ciharics Smith Mary and Jeff Soderstrom LXave and Jeanne Truax Lynn Walstedt John and Kit Wojcik Nanev and Larrv Wo<»d RI D At BIUE($IOO-$499) Anonymous Robert and Roberta Abdo Philip and Julie Ahem Randal and Nancy Baker Maureen and Joseph Banavige JoAnn and l.aw’rence Harbelta Wade and Deb Borg Jeffrey Brauchle and Elisa Schoonover Bill and Bette Bruning Steven and Deborah Buchholz Mark and Karena Casev Michael and Luci Choricv Mitchell and Jeanne Cook Dodd and Ann Cosgrove Margaret Cost Julie and Jeff Davis William Deloney Susan and Thomas Enlow Bruce and Melanie Flessner David and Nina Garfield Ian and Julie Gatehouse Gilbert and Roxane Gehle Jeff and Micki Gilmer Kay and Charles Glossop Roberta Rott and Larry Hanke Helen and William Hartfiel Beth and Finn Haug Todd and Teresa Haugan Stephen and Robyn Helland Mark and Debbie Heyne Bob and Ann Ibler Fredrick and Bonnie Keller Charles and Emily Kelley Joanne and Mark Knittel Bruce and Lorrie Landram Dick and Debbie Lewis Melissa and Noel Martinson Howard and Elizabeth McMillan III Margaret Merkow Matthew and Karen Mcscher Thomas and Catherine Mich Shery l Morrison David and Nancy Nachbar Reuben Palm Charla Rines Scott and Sharon Rosengren Dave and Margie Schneider Charles and Pameb Schroeder Tom and Mary Supel Kriss and Jerry Timpe Rolf and Liz Turnquist Michael and Donna Wallace Stephen and Linda Hall Whitman SPARTANS S500-S999 Jerry and Janet Boschwitz Ron and Joleen Carlson Mona and David I larmann Matt and Caroline Helling Mark and Joan Kosicradzki Chris and Cheryl Kulseth Michael and Kathleen McClure David Page and Roberta Brackman Gregg and Susan Sampson Kevin and Polly Schoen Jane and John Sherman Jon and Nora Sillerud Martha Spencer Henry’ and Cynthia Sweatt Susan and Dean Thomson Fred and Eleanor Winston Barbara and Gene Wulf HONOR ROLL SI000-S2499 Richard and Connie Apple Mark and Mimi Bendickson Nancy and Brent Bordson John and Susan Breon Daniel and Joy Ann Buss Kitty and David Crosby Jud and Elizabeth Dayton Tim and Barbara Doten John and Tina Gabos Richard and Jennie Goelz Pete and Cimli Goitschalk Bowman and Karen Gray Dave and Tera Gross Linda and Glenn leffrey Bruce and Colleen Lea Stephen and t armen Mann LaRaye Osborne and Mark Ten Evek Dan and i iiula Pelak Michael iid Linda Redmond Kathleen and Joseph Reis. Jr. Denise and Jim Render State Bank of Long Ijike Bob and Kathi Tunheim Catherine Wersal and John \V msi, ,, William and Karyn Whiteh I GRAD \Tf i2500-$4999 John ai ''■irah Lindahl Diane John Malone Robert id Lucy Mitchell Mike and Laurie Snow INDOWMINT PUND UADERSNIP DONORf SCHOLAR $5000-59999 Mark and Carol Engebretson Robert and Nancy Lux VALEDK rORIAN S10,000-S24,999 Todd anil Katherine Urness Andrew and Martha Van de Ven CUM LUJDE $25,000 $49,999 Mark and Anne Donahoe IRIiUTIS ANP RIMORIALS NunHiNO oirrs aND iWABDS Albrecl oundation Alliani hsystems Community Invest! ' I'oundation Amcri lixpress Foundatton Amen ‘oundation Bemis upany Genci ills Fouiulatioii Guida aiindaiion Luthci I'lrothcrhood R B.C in Rauschcr Thrivi Financial lor I uihfiaii- L'.S. 11 u irp Founilaiioii WEM nidation Even' cllon lias F Alliani «- office cil JoAnn and Lawrence Barbetta Nancy and Brent Bordson Draper and Molly JafTray Charles and Emily Kelley Terry and Barbara Longe Andrew and Julie Page Jane and John Sherman Andrew and Martha Van de Ven ORONO IDUCATION SCHOLARSHIP PUND la honor of: Don Anderson Edward L. Price (Grandpa of Eric. Patrick. Connor and Andrew Fleming) Schumann Special Ed Teachers and Para-Professionals la armory of: Bowman Gray III Arlene Hoppe Curtis L Carlson Anonymous Patrick and Mary Lou Doherty Thomas and Judy Micke Carl Shutts nMOTNY CACHIN MIMOaiAL rUND Tim and Kathy Swanson Dean and Jeanine Weisbeck ROBERT BRANDENBURG MEMORIAL FUND Donn and Sheila Ann Barth Michael Blanski Margaret Blazek Mary'ann Brandenburg R.O. and Jean Brandenburg W'allace and Jean Brunswold Sarah Cherry Mar>- Cunnicn-Schwcich Judith Cunningham Marly and Lisa Dieirith-Bloiker Tim and Ann Fleming Charles ,md |ovte Fox Jellrey and lem Fox Mar\ el and Pamela GaRlncr Samuel Vioail IrMit and Jeanne Goldenbeig Daniel anil Kav Halvorscn suveil and Am' llankey I rslie Ann Lihnson Richard and |* nice Ku mm |. ssita Knig Hni' e and I nine Ijmdtam Barbara and Terry Longe Thomas and Catherine Mich Sheryl Morrison Bradley and Patricia Morrow William and Dorothy Nelligan James and Jeana Peinovich Jeff and Marilyn Peterson Connie Priesz Joann and Doug Reynolds Russell and Patty Sherer Kim and Susan Walker bcAn and Jeanine Wcislicck VOLUNTEERS Kristi Anderson Susan Breon Susan Devine Bowman Gray Draper Jaffray Susan Larkin Carrie Woodward Lee Jessica Louisiana Barb Longe Adi Luedike Don and Wendy Peterson Ellen Phelps Susan Sampson Tom Schcrer Dwight Seward Mar\- Smitli Mike and Laurie Snow Susan Stone Betsy Yamron . i' ' at-i ■ misvion III pbav : . -/h-'ut t.nJ > ■ ' 'the .»'« to/Hihlkation '« 'IF '. iwgivi ’ ’ii'b Donor Profile Kafhi Tunheim. Pasf PTO President Kathi runhcim>> recent gift to the Orono Alliance for Education was aciually four years in the making! Kaihi Tunheim and her family moved lo Orono in 1997. One year later, she got involved with the PTO because she had one eleineniar>-aged child and two more that would be entering Orono in a few years. In 2000, she co-chaired a very successful Tun Fest and enjoyed meeting people, getting involved and raising money directly to support the schools. \ * i After encouragement from JoyAnn Buss, a former Alliance board member, and Fllcn Phelps, Elcmcntar)' PTO President at the time, Kathi took on the leadership role of President in 2001-2002. She quickly began to sec how the PTO could heighten its impact by working more closely with the middle school and high school associations and sup porting the efforts of the Alliance. As a professional organizational development consultant. Kathi sees the biggei picture and how eac h of us contributes to the whole. She realized that by working more closely with the Allianc.^, tbc P1 0 could double its impact. She decided to set an example by making a financial contribution to iht Alliance in honor of the PTO. Cotuinued on next page S('rf(l[d fil( f ( n’( r ' : ‘ hnjnnhrn I / (1 1 1 / l7(/t « f ; M S Make a donation in hoiu>r of a stall nu-mber and the Alliaiuc will send them a card ol appreciation with your personal niessa);e included For more inlormaiion. call ^52-34 Vb873 CAN NUPf For volunteer opportunities with the Alliance, call 952-545-6873 SAVE THE DATE.. l-orie Line Concert April 24ih, 2003 Orono High School Gym I he Ciala fundraiser incliHles a silcm auction and pre-show dinner. Call 932-343-6336 Tickets range in price from $30 to $100 Tunheim, conlinued from previous page Kathi and her husband, Bob, have chosen a few important oi^ganizations that have meant a great deal to them over the years to receive annual gifts. Their church, their colleges (undergraduate and graduate schools) and now the Alliance, will lienefit from a set annual donation in their family's name. Instead of thinking year-to-year, my husband and 1 have made a decision lo give the Alliance annual donations over the next 12 years. We think what the Alliance has already done in so short a time is wonderful and we want to help support its future accomplishments.” she said. In addition to providing needed funds, Kathi's actions serve to role “My husband and I have hi'cn blessed in our lives. Our parents were teachers and farmers who started with very little. But they had determination, a focus on education and a belief in giving bach. Our gift represents our chance to “give-bach” to an organization that is helping our bids gel a fabulous education.” model the lessons she learned as a child, for her own children. “1 want my children to make giving a part of their everyday Ii’'es. 1 want them to see that they, too, are part of a bigger world and that they have a responsibility to give back to it for all they have received. My gift to the Alliance is one way 1 can show them what giving back really means." she said. If you arc interested in making a gift in honor of a person or organization, please contact the Alliance at 952-345-6873. Tammv Hauser / F..\ecutive Director Want to stretch your donation to the Alliance * even further? 1 iiul i>ut if your company will match your donation. Just ask your MR Director and then send in the form with your donation and we will take it from there. 1 he lollow ing companies mau hed .Alliance gills in 2002: Allsrei hi 1 ouiulation 1 lonevwcll Amem an 1 \pi .‘ss Mediromc Faiuiulalion nemis ( oinpaiiy 1 tnintlaliem Kill l ouiulaiion Cisco 1 ound.ilion shoulilei anil Sporis Medicine Specialists Coinpuler \etu ork lei hnolog\Slate Bank ol Long L.ake R B ( 1 >ain Rausi hei 1; s H.itu orp Lleiinc.*' Xdvtiiivcr Ine W\S, Citainget Inc ' Fan Is.uc Wells Faigo Foundation 1 Gi Ml tal Milb Foundation \Vt M 11'uiuiation t f iOK 111 Long MN SS3S6 952-S4SAI73 U.S. POSTAGE PAID MINNEAPOLIS. MN PERMIT *28668 It's So Easy Order from Amazon.com and help the Alliance at the same time! amazon.com ft If’you order anything from Ama20n.com I' the Orono website, ww w.oionoalliancc.< Amaron icon at the hottt>in of our hom* | receive 5% of the total purchase. Tell yon tn .1 •<l!g to ’ 'inKinvi ft) the \!iMMce will • i;.l oeiglibors. t-.ihy FU21Y DOCK r ^ - \** 4 off4 Orono A lliance For Education "A Foundation for excellence' Mission The Mission of the Orono A Ilia nee for Education is to preserve and enhance the quality of student education hy sif>nificantly increasinft the revenue and other resources available to the Orono Public Schools. In 2002, wc pnivided more than $200,000 to: ★ PRESERVE 5.75 K-12 teaching positions; * PURCHASE donor-designated technology and learning resources; ★ FUND scholarships and mini-grants through the Orono Education Fund With your help, wc can achieve even greater results in 2003! Tammy I lauscr Executive Director January 03 3 4000 3600 D 3200 2800 F mrtTH W 2400 G 2000 H 1600 I I 1 800 400 te*n4T4 t.wo Of. m«t 'C\Y. ^ Ktuir mv. • M.fJL i___LCH ? ■ Utt ^ 0I AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, MARCH HKWittl. 7:00 P.M. —120C ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINI^IQ'i^n O (•) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council A under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the I Public Packet • located on the counter near the sign in sheet. 31 uaicssgrmu -800 ROLL CALL CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approve/Amend ^ APPROVAL OF MINUTES • 2. Regular Council February 24,2003 00 PRESENTATION 3. Oreno Alliance for Education - Bo^%lnan Gray ^ -7 r- O PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS-Andrew McDennoU PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - C/nlhi* Bremer PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Mlnuln Per PenoD) L . ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 4. 802-28S9 Blake and Mary Bichanich, 332 Westlake Street - Variances 5. #03-2865 Kevin Manley, 1973 Fagemess Point Read - Variance - Resolution __40C ^ ^03-2870 Roberta V'aughn, 205 Tonka Avenue - Long Line Rearrangement - Resolution 7. #03-2871 Sally and Dan Weatherly, 1214 Wildhurst Trail - Aflcr-lhe-Fact Variances- Resolution i5 mayor /council report • anri SER'’ICE DIRECTOR'S REPORT 800 g. Request for Purchase of NTDES Stormwater Program Sollwarc 9. Accept Quotations for North Long Lake East Sewer 0 CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 10. pay Requests > Long Lake Fire Station 11. Application and Certificate for Payment No. 10 - Long Lake Fire Station __s onn ' Orono Municipal Code Section 5.30, Solicitors and Transient Merchants - Ordinance 1 ZUw 13 Amend City Recorder Fee Schedule 14. Opposition to Ridgedale Court Closing > Resolution 15. Accept School Resource Officer Training Grant / ? 16. Park Commission Appointments ? 17. Plamting Commission Appointments _10QQ 18. 2002/2003/2004 Police Sergeant Contract CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 8 19. LICENSES Kennel License Renewals —2000 • 20. BILLS UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS Q 2203 03/13 - Town Meeting, Navane* Freshwater Center, 7;00 p.m, 03/17 - Planning Commission, 6:30 p.m. •“2400 03/24 - Council Meeting, 7.00 p.m. 04/07 - Park Commission Meeting 7:15 p.m. 1 0 Mcetini^ 7;00 p.m. • ^ 04/21 - Planning Commission, 6:30 p.m. 04/23 - Board of Review. Wednesday, 7:00 p,m* —2800 04'28 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 11 —3200 I 4 m Application Deadline: 1/8/2003 60 Day Deadline: 3/9/2003 Extension: 5/8/2003 •• • • • ^ 0 2003 OMONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: Name: Jennifer Chaput Title: Planner DATE: March 4.2003 ITEM NO. ^ Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:m2-2m niakc & Mary Bichanich 332 Westlake Street Variance Exhibits: A Neighborhood area section map & Table Zoning Application #1791B 3 4 5 6 7 8 C D E Survey of existing houses at 324 and 332 Westlake Street Survey of proposed addition to existing houses Applicant's variance request Staff report to the Planning Commission Planning Commission meeting minutes 1/19/1993 Staff report to the City Council City Council meeting minutes 2/8/1993 Resolution #3231 Building permit record Staff Report and exhibits of 1/22/2003 Additional information from the applicant (March 3,2003) 1 l etter regarding proposal 2 Existing site plan 3 Proposed site plan with existing house overlayed 4 Proposed site plan with 15 ’ setbacks 5 Site plan with 20 ’ setbacks (recommended by Planning Commission) 6 Proposed site plan with 100 ’ wide lot to the south Pertinent Code Sections: 1. Section 10.23. Subd. 6 (B): Lot area, width and setbacks: The following minimum requirements shall be obser\ed in the LR-1A One Family Lakeshore Residential District: lot area of 2 acres; lot width of 200 feet; side yard setbacks of 30 feet. Application Summarx': The applicants arc requesting the following variances in order to construct a new house in the same location as a house exists today: 1. side yard setbacks; 11’ to the south and 19.3’ to the north where 30 ’ is required 2. lot width; 100.28' where 200 ’ is required 3. lot area: 1.34 acres (58.659 s.f) where 2 acres (87.120 s.f.) are required History: In January, 1993 (Zoning File //1791), the applicants requested variances to construct additions to the existing residences. At the time, the lots were not combined and two separate homes existed. The application proposed the combination of the lots and construction of additions, combining the two separate residences into one dwelling. The existing houses did not meet the side yard setbacks required for the zoning district (30 feet on either side) and they were not proposed to change with this application. The proposed application included the following: 1. A front porch addition (50 s.f. of hardcover) within the substandard side yard setback on the house to the south; 2. A basement addition on the hou.se to the north; 3. Move the house on the north 10’ closer to the lake, maintaining the existing side yard setbacks; 4. A tower of less than 30 feet in height to join i/-.i /o homes; 5. Side setbacks remain as they exist: 20.1’ on the north lot line; 12.7’ on the south lot line The Planning Commission and City Council approved the application as presented in 1993.1 he application was clearly for additions to existing structures. Variances to the side yard setbacks were granted because the application requested changes to existing structures, already located at substandard setbacks. The house to the north was moved closer to the lake in order to construct a basement, positioned with the same side yard setback as it existed previously. The variances to the side yards were acceptable for the existing structures because it is not the City's practice to require that existing homes be relocated to meet required .setbacks. Current Application: The current application does not involve additions or renovations to the existing structures. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing home in its entirety and rebuild a home on the lot. fhe applicant is requesting the same side yard setbacks as were granted with his 1993 application. 1 lowcver, this application is for new construction which has, historically, been treated differently from renovations of existing structures. The City ’s policy regarding new construction is that iuiy proposed structure must conform to the required hardcover, lot coverage and setback requirements for that zoning district. Since the lot is 100’ in width, a new home 40’ in width could be constructed with 30’ side yard setbacks. A number ot lots have been combined since then, leaving only a few at widths of 50’. The lot sizes and w idths are quite varied. Staff has researched the neighboring lots and provided lot area, width and setback information on an attached table and section map (Exhibit A). The most recent new construction in the neighborhood, 372 Westlake Street, met all of the setback requirements for lb*' >ning district w ithout requiring a setback variance. i r Y PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission recommended by a 6 to I vote to: Approve the lot width and lot area variances as presented and to alter the side yard setbacks from those proposed to not less than 20 feet on each side, permitting up to a 6 foot encroachment into either 20’ side yard for roof overhang but no other structural elements and requiring the removal of the existing shed in the 0*75’ hardcover zone, which applicant at his option may replace with a lock box of no more than 200 s.f. and 40 feet in height. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested lot area and lot width variances with the condition that the existing shed in the 0-75’ hardcover zoned be removed. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Staff requests that the Council take the following action: 1. Approve the variances for lot width and lot area with the condition that the existing shed in the 0-75’ hardcover zone be removed; 2. Take action regarding the request for side yard variances; 3. Direct staff to draft a resolution with the Council ’s action for adoption at the February 24, 2002 meeting. APPLICANT REQUEST: The applicant is aware of staff’s position on the application. The applicant agrees with the Planning Commission ’s recommendation with the e.xception of the 20’ side yard setbacks. The applicant requests that the side yard setbacks be reduced to 15’ on either side, as shown in the attached drawings, submitted March 3,2003. The applicant also wishes to present his infomintion to the City Council at the meeting. \ ^ •'•n ; • L^ iSiTo sgS 540,0 45?UC^kCJf^m •s * A '•5)i J=5i'^5(22) 32§ ttt s(23)»*»Aoo<te>» »n S33.2? 529.43 525.64 <fl •J • <4» ‘ (5^ •& ? ^T tt . •• 4 »J6) S (25)T s {^ 7(^ ■ :9 -ii-5 2»3.5 2 0 AlLLV 16 Z o •2 ('12> . ^ C3^.- OM^'k:*e5> *' :e5i® S ;0.(i^Nfe»; 5 r- 213.5 t ‘O KUf^ .AC 6-9.-S6 o.fe-^-wtes^..iija r,l VAC OOC NO 2711665 ''3(LAKIIM@W)T (HlliO<aMir I •' \20 ‘5s \ • • 120) '<X '.V * \i Table 1: Westlake Neighborhood Histoiy (LR-IA Zoning District) Property Address Lot Area Lot Width Side' Setback (North) Side Setback (South) Front Setback (Lake) Rear Setback Year iluilt Variances Lot Combinations Westlake Street 309 1.6 acres i50’45.2’12 ’167’ (street) 234’1950 (1995 Addition) File «1996 (1995: side yard setback) 3 lots combined (1996) (309.324.325) 325 0.517 50’none none none none vacant None None 332 1.34 acres 100 28’20. r 12.7 ’140 ’375’1906 (1993 addition) File# 1791 (1993: side yard setbacks) 2 lots combined (1993) 340 0.67 acres 50.14 ’2.94’6.37’140 ’428’1946 None None 341 0.525 acres 50’4.8’16.6’216 ’200’1914 (1977 garaRc) File«32l (1977: garage location) None 348 0.67 acres 50.14 ’8.4’10 ’128 ’415 ’1951 None None 349 0.71 acres 90 ’10 ’5’210 ’210 ’1908 None No record 356 0.67 acres 50.14 ’6.08’11.32 ’125 395 1930 (1986 remodel) None None 364 1.44 acres 233.74’none none none none Vacant (2000 demo) File #2465 (2000: lot area. avg. lakesliore setback) Lot line rearrangement (2000) 365 0.47 acres 100 ’19.3 ’ (side street) 60’ 1 nr 1 68.8’1924 File # 2369 (1998: variances prior to combo) Combination (1999) (365.373) 372 1.20 acres 307.79’96’ (street)98 ’ (east)79.6’30’ (north)2002 File « 2465 (2000: lot line rearrangement) Lot line rearrangement (2000) 389 0.63 acres 136 ’90 ’5’130 ’ (street) 40’1910 (1986 remodel) None No record (3 lots) BaysMe Road 3845 0.194 acres 50'8.93 ’ (west)6’ (east)78’42’1958 (1993 remodel) None None 3855 0.228 acres 50’8’ (west)15 ’ (east)100 ’50’ 1 1958 None None 3865 i.917 acres 225’60’10 ’170 ’100 ’1916 ^1987 remodel) None 2 parcels. 1 address 3W5 '0.984 acres T50’ (slieel) 60’20’100 ’ (street) 150 ’1971 None None Dbirkt Reqairements 2 acres 200 ’30’30’75’50* > t 1 S V) 5^ n;s Jl^ M £5?-. '*■ \ n C09..4>. /% 1 / U) i *t) ^ “« .0 o V VI r' X t $ ^ 5j ± ■E/K5ni\l6-W:OU^S TO uOT" osme^wMicAi & 0 fi ;1 ?:\9i n ■WOfaC-e.0 1U ^)dl<s.'TI \ HDU6e<=i If ifiql} . i • • • !* %•! • • Vft VARIA^JCE REQUEST I own two adjacent pieces of property (32fe & 332 W. Lake St.) with existing houses on each. One serves as our primary residence and the other as our guest house and seasonal storage area. My intent, if I receive this variance as requested, is to legally combine the two properties and then to connect the existing structures with an addition. Existing setbacks are 12.7 feet on the south side and 20.1 feet on the north side. I do oat need to change these setbacks as all of the work falls between these existing conditions. In fact, once the lots are combined, most of the addition will meet the 30' sideyard setback of the newer ordinances passed since the original structures were built. The hardship I face is that the lots are very narrow and the new sideyard setback requirements of 30' make it impossible to build uoon them, i.e. a 50' lot with 30' sideyard setback leaves a negative 10' for construction. Ey combining the properties I create a 100' wide lot, but the 30' setbacks are still excessive and the existing houses still do not comply. I am therefore asking for a sideyard setback variance to leave the setbacks as they presently exist, which met the requirements at the time the houses were built. Thank you for your help in this matter. Elake Bichanich BE/hks -mm -■— r i4 ^4 To:Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Promt Date: Subject: Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager January 13, 1993 #1791 Blake Bichanich, 332 Westlake Street Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IA, Lakeshore Residential, 2 acre minimum Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.23, Subd. 6 (B) - side yard setback. Existing Proposed South side lot line 12.7' 12.7' North side lot line 20.1' 20.1' List of Exhibits A - B - C D E F G H I J Application Property Owners List Plat Map Existing Survey Survey with Proposed Addition Proposed Floor Plan - Lower Level Proposed Floor Plan - Main Level West Elevation East Elevation Variance Request Description of Request The applicant requests approval of side lot line variances in order to construct additions to an existing residence. Two adjacent parcels, 324 and 332 Westlake Street, are owned by the applicant who would like to combine the lots and construct an addition which would combine two existing residences to form a single dwelling. The proposed remodel of the house to the south includes a front porch addition of approximately 50 square feet within the substandard side yard setback. The addition of a basement is proposed on the north house which currently has a crawl space only. The proposed ba&ement will result in no additional hardcover in the setback area. A tower is also proposed which would attach the two structures. The tower would not encroach into the setback areas and meets the 30' height limitation. I Zoning Pile #1791 January 13, 1993 Page 2 The proposed renovation would result in the following; Approximately 50 square feet of hardcover would be added within the side yard setback area. The niaximuia encroachment into the side yard setbacks will remain the same. The hardcover, including all proposed changes, is well below the required percentages with the exception in the 0-75' zone which has one existing shed covering approximately 67 s.f. Lot coverage for the combined parcel is at approximately 2%. Due to the anticipated combination of these parcels, the applicant has already been assessed for one sewer unit. Hardship StateiMnt The applicant's hardship is the long and narrow nature of the lots. The combination of these two lots will result in a 100.28' lot width while the zoning district requires a minimum of 200' . Due to the 30' side yard setbacks, the allowable building envelope is very restrictive at 40' wide. The proposed changes result in no further encroachment into the side yard setback area, as well as the fact that most of the addition would meet the 30' side yard setback. The changes add only slightly to the lot coverage in the setback area and should not be a significant detriment compared to the benefit of combining the parcels and renovating the residence. Isv t J' y MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 19, 1993 ZONING FILE 91790 - CONT. It was movad by Chair Bellows, seconded by Cohen, to recommend approval of Application #1790, Minnetonka Center for the Arts, on the property located at 2040 North Shore Drive, for a variance to install a directional sign along County Road 16. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#6) #1791 BLAKE BICHANICH, 332 WESTLAKE STREET - VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 7:56 - 8:00 P.M. The Affidavit of Pubi I cat I on and Certificate of Mailing were noted. \ Mr, and Mrs. Bichanich were present for this application. Weckman explained the applicants own two adjacent parcels, for which they propose a 50 •* f. addition to the south side of the residence and another add It on of a basement lower level to the north side of the residence. They are proposing to move the northern structure 10* closer to the lake to enhance the view, and a tower Is proposed to join the two structures. The property has been assessed for one sewer unit. The hardship Is the narrowness of the lots. Johnson asked the setback from the lake. Bichanich noted the houses are approximately 160’ to 200’ from the lake. It was moved by Chair Bellows, seconded by Cohen, to recommend approval of Application #1791, Blake Bichanich, 332 Westlake Street, for side lot line variances to construct additions to the existing residences. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#6) #1792 DON GRONBERG, 110 LEAF STREET - VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 8:00 - 8:15 P.M. The Affidavit of Pub I I cat I on and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Don Gronberg and Mark Gronberg were present. Mabusth briefly reviewed the areas of lots within the neighborhood and two area variances approved since 1975 based on current rural standards. The property now has sower available. However, the shore I and regulations require the residence to be setback 75 from the edge of the tributary is opposed to the 26’ setback previously required. This requirement reduces the building envelope, as well as the need to dedicate right-of-way for Loaf Street. F’- t ^r- TO:Mayor Callahan and Orono CouncUmembers Ron Moorse» City Administrator mOM: DATE: Stephen Weckman, On-site Systems Manager February 2, 1993 SUBJECT: fH19\ Blake Bichanich, 332 Westlake Street, Variance - Public Hearing Discussion of Application The applicant requests approval of side lot line variances in order to construct additions to an existing residence. Two adjacent parcels. 324 and 332 Westlake Street, are owned by the applicant who would like to combine the lots and construct an addition which would combine two existing residences to form a single dwelling. The proposed remodel includes a front porch addition on Ae house to the south of approximately 50 s.f. which would lie within the substandard side yard setback. The addition of basement is proposed on the north house, which currently has a crawl space only. The proposed basement will result in no additional hardcover within the setback area. A tower is also proposed which would attach the two structures. The tower would not encroach into the setback areas and meets the 30’ height limitation. The proposed renovation would result in the following: Approximately 50 s.f. of hardcover would be added within the side yard setback area. The maximum encroachment into the side yard setbacks will remain the same. 20.1’ north side lot line and 12.7 ’ for the south side lot line. The hardcover, including all proposed changes, is well below the required percentages with the exception of the 0-75’ zone which has one existing shed covering approximately 67 s.f. Lot coverage for the combined parcel is approximately 2%. Due to the anticipated combination of these parcels, the applicant has already been assessed for one sewer unit. Planning Commission Recommendation The Plannipg Commission unanimously approved the variance application with the following conditions: 1.The two parcels. 324 and 332 Westlake Street, must be legally combined prior to the issuance of a permit. 2. This residence must be hooked up to the City sewer as soon as possible and before new construction is occupi^. Please review the Planning Commission packet for further detail. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the fmdings and conditions set forth in the Planning Commission’s recommendation. / MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY B, 1993 ZONING FILE #1790 - CONT. V®^*.**. the hardship Is the difficultly In directing students unfafnIMar with the area. v2h?cilL^?i!ijlI J®tter to allow the directional sign than to have vehicles trying to turn around In the area. It /''oved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to adopt Resolution #3230 for Application #1790 Minnetonka Center for the North Shore Drive, for a variance to allow the installation of a directional sign on a residential property. Ayes nays 0. (#8) #1791 BLAKE BICHANICH, 322 WESTLAKE STREET - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3231 Blake Bichanich was present. Weckman reviewed the two properties are owned In common and the applicant proposes the addition of an entrance to one structure, and a basement to the other. A tower will Join the two structures together. The property has been assessed one sewer unit, and connection will be a condition of approval. Qoetten asked If the shed in the 0-75’ zone is movable. She noted the structure is considered non-conforming. Bichanich stated that has been there a long time and could not easily be moved. Jabbour, seconded by Kelley, adopting Resolution #3231 for Application #1791 for Blake Bichanich, 322 Westlake Street, approving a side setback variance for the renovation of existing structures, noting the non-conforming status of the structure In the 0-75’ zone. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#9) #1792 DON GRONBERG, 110 LEAF STREET - VARIANCES Mark Gronberg was present. r ! l\ 6110402 t>6 M. CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.3231 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE #1791 WHEREAS, Blake Bichanich (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 332 Westlake Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and leeally described as follows: Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Hillside Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and W^REAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of additions to his existing house within a substandard side yard setback. The maximum encroachment into the side yard setbacks wUl remain at 20.r to the north side lot line and 12.7 ’ to the south side lot line where the required side yard setback is 30 ’. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City CouncU of Orono. FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1791. 2. The property is located in the LR-IA, Lakeshore Residential Tnning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 19, 1993, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based on the following . WANSFIR INTHSOor PfWMrv TAX t PUBUC arowos JUL 2 1993 Page 1 of 5 i CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3231 A.A combination of the two parcels will bring the property closer to conforming to 2 acre minimum requirement. B. C. The narrow lots severely restrict development on the combined parcels. The maximum encroachment into tlie side yard setback area will remain the same and hardcover additions within the substandard setback will be limited to 50 s.f. in area. D . The hardcover including all proposed changes is well below the required percentages in all but the 0-75 ’ zone, which will not be intensified. E.Lot coverage for the combined parcel is approximately 2%. 4.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5.The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of additions to the existing home subject to the following conditions: 1.Two parcels, 324 and 332 Westlake Street, must be legally combined prior to the issuance of a building permit for the proposed construction. Page 2 of 5 nil CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.3231 2.The residence must be connected to the municipal sewer prior to the final inspection by the City inspector of the new construction. 3.Applicant is placed on notice that the accessory structure located within the 0-75 ’ setback zone is non-conforming and subject to all pertinent ordinances. Any structural repair will require City approval. 4.Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (February 8, 1994). 5.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6.The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of February, 1993. Edward J. ^lahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) ll -*} Page 3 of 5 SBi CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3231 «SHO STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 8th day of February, 1993, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the Cit>* of Orono, a Mirmesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the Ci^. a. r1 Notary Public MV COHM iMcw BiMinfra My Commission Expires \ Page 4 of 5 o. o CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCH. N0._a22J_______ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this id day of , 199 3 before me a Noiaiy ’ Urtimr/' Public within and for said counQr, personally appeared flf\. 6cchar>ich ■* B.Samsc rj^ fg/ eiOne-r ef -Me prcpe/'4^ known to me to be the person(s) described in and'who executed the foregoing instn^ent. ain acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. UHDA S. VEE HOttmw&uc HENWEPIN COUrffy. ..My conMrfulon ««trM ••IMS STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of ,, 199__before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBUC Page 5 of 5 hmrndm^mm !■ ■ null* . fr/u-1 - rv ••;s • • RESOLUTION 13231 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNT! OF HENNEPIN ..) ) CITT OF ORONO ) .A f . •• CountJ '‘J’' '“I' “■•'’"O- HennepinCounty. Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the of the City Council of the City of Orono With the original record of such resolution in the Minutes of the '°“"°‘^^Vlr•^‘Vnrti;:tVn‘e‘i[r“ir^ i’ttm-------------------- ■ ■ ■ --- — ^ - e —V 0aiuv M9 a wr U6 Counc?r« ““I' ••iH Ctty In Witness Whereof. I have hereunto set my hand and seal this ■^Qfch- - -1 day of February _ _ _ _ _ _. I993 , /b^othy <. M allin. City Clerk (SEAL) , I 'Iw A't'.ft* M v:.'^ -- -^ -M Peratt No ^7 6<Alt> S’SOs 333 CO. ds^aJcn -^shssjh PERMIT RECORD Pate /e-3iU~itS O t?- 5 _____^ /0'/S'9\ hl-^^ L±i±-i. o Type of Permi t - *i ^JiX^ryyhinj ^JL>0>Mn^'€y LOjJl! cldTJh. btmUA •p TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Jennifer Chaput, City Planner DATE:January 10, 2003 SUBJECT:#02-2859 Blake and Mary Bichanich 332 Westlake Street Variances — Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-1A One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 acre) 1.34 acres (58,659 s.f.) Exhibits: A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. I.. Analysis Worksheet Application Hardcover Calculations Survey Plat Map Location Map Proposed Site Plan Proposed Grading Plan Proposed House Elevations Proposed I louse Plans Property Owner’s List Photos of Property Pertinent Code Sections: 1 . Section 10.23, Subd. 6 (B): Lot area, width and setbacks: The following minimum requirements shall be observed i'' the LR-1 A One Family Lakeshore Residential District: lot area of 2 acres; lot width of 200 feet; side yard setbacks of 30 feet. Application Summary: The applicants are requesting variances in order to construct a new house in the same location as a house exists today on the property. In order to rebuild a home on this property within the same dimensions as previously granted, the following variances are required: 1 . side yard setbacks: 11 ’ to the south and 1 9.3* to the north where 30' is required 2. lot width: 100.28* where 200* is required 3. lot area: 1 .34 acres (58,659 s.f.) where 2 acres (87,120 s.f.) are required n02-2S5^ Blake and Mary Bichanich JJ2 Westlake Street 1/23/2002 Page I of 4 Resolution U3231 (Zoning File //1791), recorded in 1993, permitted the applicants to construct additions to the existing home on this property with the following variance: side yard setbacks of 19.3 feet to the north and 12.7 ’ to the south where 30’ is required. Two parcels were also combined at that time to bring the lot width and area closer to conformity. Discussion: By the current Zoning Ordinance, the existing house is non-conforming. Since the applicants arc proposing to move the existing house off of the property and build a new house, the new structure should be constructed as close to conformity as possible. The propo.sed plan eliminates a detached garage which is currently situated over the lot line and onto the neighboring property and proposes an attached garage 10' from the lot line. Since the proposed garage is attached, it is considered to be part of the principal structure, requiring a 30' setback instead of 11 ’ for a detached garage. An accessory structure exists within the 0-75' hardcover zone. This structure was also identified in the 1993 application, referenced above. Tlie resolution stated that this structure was non- conforming and any structural repairs would require City approval. I he applicant is not proposing to change the structure from how it currentiv exists. Hardship: The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit B. 'I he applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Issues for Consideration: 1 . Variances granted on a property for past construction are not applicable to new construction on the same property; 2. Granting the requested variances for new construction on this property will set a precedent for redevelopment of the modest-sized properties to the immediate south (pictured in Exhibit M); 3. The hardcover requirements in each zone are met with the exception of the existing accessor>' structure in the 0-75' zone; 4. The non-conforming detached garage, currently located over the property line, is removed with the proposed plan; 5. The attached garage is considered part of the principal structure and should be evaluated according to the setback requirements for a principal structure; 6. 1 he applicant combined the adjoining lot in order to increase the lot width and lot area to be closer to conformity as required with their previous application; 7. Most other lakeshorc lots in this slowly redeveloping neighborhood are less than 1 acre in area and less than 200 ’ in width; therefore, requiring the full 2 acre side setback standards i^02-2859 Blake and Mary Bichanich 332 Westlake Street 1/23/2003 Page 2 of 4 i may not be appropriate; 8. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Staff Recommendations: If the Planning Commission feels that the applicant should be able to maintain the setbacks permitted from previously approved variances on the property to construct a new house, the application should be approved. However, if the Planning Commission feels that the new house should be built to meet the required side yard setbacks and not set a precedent for future redevelopment in the area, the apj'Iication should be tabled to allow the applicant to present an altered plan. Options for Planning Commission Action: 1. Recommend approval of the requested variances. 2. Recommend denial, stating reasons. 3. Table. 4. Other action. M2~2859 Blake and Mary Bichanich 332 Westlake Street 1/23/2003 Page 3 of 4 » i ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Hardcover Calculations: LR-IA Lot Requirements: M2~2859 Blake and Mary Bichanich 332 Westlake Street 1/14/2003 Pagt4af4 A Distance from shoreline Total area in setback Allowed hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover 0-75’7,521 s.f.Os.f 67.45 s.f 67.45 s.f (0%)(0.89%)(0.89%) 75-250’17,500 s.f.4,375 s.f 3,710 s.f 4,369 s.f (25%)(21.2%)(24.96%) 250-500’25,000 s.f.7,500 s.f 2,500 s.f 3,079 s.f '/o)(10%)(12.3%) 500-1,000’8,638 s.f.3,023 s.f 850 s.f 880 s.f (35%)(9.8%)(10.2%) Dimensions Required Existing Proposed Lot Area 87,120 s.f (2 acres) 258,659 s.f (1.34 acres) 258,659 s.f (1.34 acres) No Change Lot Width 200’100.28’100.28’ No Change Side Setback North South 30 ’ 30' 19.3’ 12.7’ 19.3’ 12.7’ (at the house) 1 r (at the eara2el Accessory Structure Setbacks (Detached Garage) 10’0’ (on neighbor ’s property) No detached garage proposed r • « • CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial A|>pUcation Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) Application # 7 Dale Received / Amount Paid PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address 4sT __________ Property Identifiwtion ’Number (P.I.D.) - m - n ^ 9 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date l^pertv Acquired _________________ I (do)^o no^also own the adjacent parcels of land. .(month/year) Present use of property: residential Zoning District: other (specify) APPLIC^T .• Phone (home) • 47S**Z.^2.^ Name niCHAhJtCJi Phone (work ) "7 1 S'* 5? Address: (v ^ City: ryfLtsK^trs Zip: yyy/^iL&Ul. OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ______ Address: Phone (home)_ Phone (\vork)_ City:.Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Constructior Cos( $ Describe request in detail: Tq ThF^ i^vi’^iN/fea ^ STP-* A fJFJt.^ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED y Lot Area _X_ Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe tmdue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: Y*________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) I • • required submittals All of the following information must be submitted bv the applipation dgartHnt dSte in order for your apptication to be conaidergd gomplgfg; 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within ISO', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-5910). Certiflcate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8J4" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and prop'^sed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/2" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views provide one (1) copy 8'/j" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendim to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour lariancc application is not complete if the above information haa not been included. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is tnw and correct to the bes^fhis/hen knowledge. Applicant's Signature 5 uw ana correci lo ine Dcsyoi his/hen knowledge. p/oA:’. /T)i^lthxMX. Dale jH/I OW'NER'S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner ’s Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. IT V. pKif q I \ December 17. 2002 Variance Request To City Staff, Planning Commission and Council Members: In May of 1988 we purchased 324 and 332 Westlake Street. Each parcel had 50' of lakeshore and was approximately COO' deep. 324 Westlake Street had a three- season cottage on it, and 332 Westlake Street had a small year round home. Our intent was to eventually combine the two properties and build a new home. In 1993 we applied for variances to build what was substantially a new home on the property (portions of the original structure were incorporated into the new construction). The Planning Commission and City Council voted unanimously to grant the variances for lot area, lot width, and side setbacks as requested. We then legally combined the two properties into a 1.4-acre site with 100' of frontage on Lake Minnetonka and built a new home. We are now back requesting the same variances that were previously granted in 1993 in order to build a new home on the property. The proposed home is sited in virtually the same position as the existing structure. It will be sited approximately 144' from the 929.4 O.H.W. and meets the average lakeshore setback. We are asking for variances to maintain the existing 12.7' side setback to the South, and to maintain the existing 19.3' side setback to the North. Please note that the existing detached garage currently extends over the south properly line and 2.3' into the neighbor's property. We propose to remedy this condition by siting the new attached garage 11' from the south property line. The proposed hardcover remains 67 s.f. for the 0-75’ zone and will be less than the allowable areas for the 75-250', 250-500' and 500- 1000 ’ zones. Hardship Statement The hardships for the site remain the same as stated in 1993. Even though we combined the two lots which resulted in a 1.4-acre lot 100.28' wide we still do not meet the 2 acre minimum or the 200’ lot width that current zoning requires. Due to the current zoning requirements for 30' side yard setbacks, the allowable building envelope is very restrictive at 40 ’. *We therefore ask for the reasonable variance to maintain the current side yard setbacks of 12.7 ’ to the south and 19.3 ’ to the north in order to build a new home that is the same width as the current home. We also ask to be able to build an attached garage 11' from the south lot line instead of the detached garage which currently extends 2.3 ’ over the south property line. We respectfully request that you grant the variances for lot area, tot width, and side setbacks as requested. Thank you for your help in this matter. Sincerely, CWARIANCE REQUEST.DOC HARDCOVE SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) CULATION WORKSHEET 75-250*250-500*500-1000* EXISTING HARnroVER IN ZONE A. House X a.S.F. Length X Width ■a • • • 6.F. X aw • • • S.F. •u X ■a S.F. R. Garage X _ S.F. C. Driveway X ■1 #__ SJ. X m S.F. D. Sidewalk X ■a S.F. X ■a __ S.F. E. Patio/Deck X aai __ S.F. X ■a I S.F. F. Landscape X - S.F.Underlain X I S.F.By Plastic X ••I S.F. 0. Other ^ri;> X 1 //>7.4r _ S.F.• TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE B 7T2-I xlOO -.S.F. A + B x 100 - PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X . S.F. Length X Width . S.F. X 8B ’ S.F. X -” S.F. B. Garage X .S.F. C. Driveway X S.F. X ] S.F. O. Sidewalk X . S.F. X S.F. E. Patio/Deck X S.F. X «a S.T. F. Landscape X S.F. Underlain X m S.F. By Plastic X m S.F. G. Other W’ .0>7.<tC S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE m a.4V S.F. A TOTAL PROreRTY AREA IN ZOlffi _ ♦ B ;100 -^ffT S.F. % jj r\\ a* *7 • % f.- 1 A B .4f: HARDCOVER CALCULAT SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ EXISTING HARl A. House IVEW IN 7/^NF. WORKSHEET 250-500*500-1000' 33»2 iW'LAkSe '2 q.4iU<WV16€ ^ -TDlA/eieUN^ _______ Width X X X B. Girage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck ^ecicsif F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X X X G. Other ?‘9>'b ' <2^i'OO TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE A A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 3^ la •L,+ B + D 1'^, ^lK> X 100 - _____ X 100 - PROPOSEn HABI A. House :r in zone Lcf^Width X X X B. Oarage C. Driveway X X D. SidewaU'X X E. Patio/Dcck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X O. Ocher PetlMHlUdrUAU^ TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL BROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ♦ B i -7j. X 100 - S.F. Me £.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. / j,troo S.F. S.F. 9-oM S.F. S.F. S.F.JSK^Zs.¥. S.F. S.F. SJ. _3^JP S.F. A Ji ^tS06> ~ S.F. B ^ a. % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. A2^2_s.f. ________SJ. S.F. ______S.F. j 2 O S.F. _______ ST. S.F. S.F. 6 _S.F. S.F. S.F. A I "7.5 DO S.F. B O ,r:!f t ^/• t __1 HilRDCOVER CALCULATION WO SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-7S* 75-250 EXISTINC HABI A. H oum •Jwi: WORK3Ufi£I 500-11 ■ Length width X X X B. Ginge C Drivewi^X X 7^ D. Sidewalk X X E Pado/0eck X X F. Landscape Uoderlata By Plastic X X X O. Other A A TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE _ + B 9^ ,O00 * B X 100 - X 100 - PROPOSED HAWnCOVER IN ZONE A. House Length Width X X X B. Oarage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlah) By Plastic X X X O. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE _ * B nnr) x loo TOTAL PRC L #28..Bo**'n .goo S.F. EF. SJ. S.F. SJ. SJ. S.F. SJ. S.F. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. __SJ. I oo/> SJ. lO % SJ. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SJ. SJ. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.J. S.F. S.F. S.F. SJ. A B S.F. A SJ. B 5 h HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* 75-250* 250-500* EXISTING BAR A. House :H1NZ cm Unfth Width X X X B. Garage C. Drivewiy X X er D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/D^ ck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plasdc X X X O. Odier A A TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZON - B _____________♦ B X 100 X 100 £ui3fSL PROPOSED HARDCftVFP IN Tnw ■. A. House ________■ X Length Width X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X S80 D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G« Ocher TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE $<?o Jf.Q ♦9^** >V nJJL. Q S.F. fi.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ST. S.F. A S.F. B S.F. S.F. S.F. ST. ST. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.T. S.F. ST. ST. ST. ST. A ST. B S kJ [M I m > s^9.4s (n St4.*iO fMi •: -• I <\TL.V# I 4 sas.c^ w 525. 77 r>M)9 • «>>• LOT sai.ss<n LOT 6 N •• «A ■ *. ■•• . .•, ..f-. V ' '.'ilk. K) nilMaiArfMiilM<MA*i.fl^Ln#i«k« —Miaiil — Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Department E '.|3 4 / • 5* ,r. /VO-- mr *l3i) cy «f?3< *m § 8 % •8 1« 8 im f 8 8 isli ■ II ^ a 8 i7jf ro 8 8 •* Iflf • tf 8 8 If 8 a It4i e »•8 8 1.7 f fl •*8 8 ; ^•(2T)8 «»J •8 • St -5 \ n *O/ ^ ^/to r •■•.i «Mf -----------------^ %«•II (44) m§ # A’ f«> <;■Ja§ j 8 fj aaSTa V4C00CM0/fffMf _j_____ tor*y 3s, S:t«4 31 »» . ni6) 0Mirof{Uft 8 ' f^ (t) ' “CLAREMONT HEIGHTS' 4M N RLSN0 576 ________4 “•rS ■- /J7- ^3<5X) rce/ Information Para«l ID 0511723230039 Houm Numb«r 332 StTMt Nam# WESTLAKE ST Thlslsnolahgafyncor^mafi. H nfifstnu • nmfiMlon of MonnMon anddMotfomOfy, County, and StMa nod mdhoritioa and odmr aourcoa. r utilwC w* 1A!N ST OAK Sf EDINA :200 CREEKWOOD TR tfOju 800 •; *•■’••• * 4. I* ,• t • ^ ^ /■ y J •k. • •.. ^ ^ *•.,.»,,, “Tr •• *".?!'>’.* — * • i 400 Classen Lake Ok 91 CHIPPEWA LA 5 BAYS IDE OFORI CIR 0 2 ^ EILEEN ST I/' ORONO HJGHj^watmtowm no CHRISTINE LR M--Si«5p « NORTH 400 % Lakeview ELM, EAST UKE ST BAYS Stubbs ^Bax^ Golf if/ OAK LA Course WEST BRANCH BO 8CC FOX vM i\orti •H- jfeijyii: I #2OO W --:; i-i -TN ^ Hi t I <LJ ^ 1► hi Vi •.> CMMV \ V- / V V.~Ti J •' 1 ri A }. y- I. ■ /.-] {... • I . I • i • * ^ ./• • #21 (?■ '''' -< ’ (iJ « /!o CT</& ^CHE-MATIC LOWEP. LEVEL FLAW rT^r^o^ NTi>. It 13' ot- iirr :U iikjwj . , r 10 owMCIt?»seoiuooH m-------M’ EfHKT • I i xrrcHOt OBMU jg-JYL 4cHEhlKnC mraxVQZ -PLAH KTiTttrr • I tr Ii^- Y 03 10 0} 6c :HE.HAn-lC UPPER LEVEL PlANi NTi.v-o" it-iaoE. w ' .V?’'> mm DA7C l2/U/f2 iAKH S9S HiNNCfXN COUNTY P20PERTY INFORtfATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PIA35AR1 PACE 7 PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR sa tS-llT-XS 23 IPIf •SOYS RAYSIDE RD JEFFREY E STRANOOERO ET AL JEFFREY t CAROLYN STRANOOERO SOYS OAYSXDE RO LONO LAKE NN S5S5A PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AODR SO 15-117-23 23 M14 ••340 WESTLAXE ST ROBERT A OLSON ROBERT A OLSON 340 WESTLAKE ST LONO LAKE NN 55354 PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AODR 30 •5-117-23 23 SPES •••30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ROBERT D ERICKSON ROBERT D ERICKSON 155SB WAYZATA BLVD 0754 WAYZATA NN 553Y1 PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AODR 30 AS-llT-ZS 23 APSY ••332 WESTLAKE ST B N BICNANICH • N B JANSSEN B N BICNANICH i N B JANSSEN 332 WESTLAKE ST LONG LAKE NN 55354 if^ //.'»'N 30 05-117-23 23 ••!• •3045 BAYSIDE RO D • K DIANIS DAVID DIANIS 57Y NE PLANTATION RD 04ION STUART FL 34YY4 30 05-117-23 23 0013 •Y340 WESTLAKE ST C K MARKER 0 T R HARRER CYNTHIA K 1 TINOTHY R HARRER 340 WESTLAKE ST LONG LAKE NN 55354 30 05-117-23 23 0015 •0354 WESTLAKE ST E C ANDERSON ETAL EDWARD ANDERSON 354 WESTLAKE ST LONG LAKE NN 55354 30 05-117-23 23 0022 •0325 WESTLAKE ST ROBERT D ERICKSON ROBERT D ERICKSON 15500 WAYZATA BLVD 0754 WAYZATA NN 553Y1 30 05-117-23 23 Y624 00341 WESTLAKE ST ROBERT D ERICKSON ROBFJir D ERICKSON 15500 WAYZATA BLVD B754 WAYZATA NN 553Y1 30 05-117-23 23 0025 0034Y WESTLAKE ST C R NCNAB IRC NCNAB ROBERT I CYNTHIA NCNAB 177 PENINSULA ROAD MEDICINE LAKE NN 55441 30 05-117-23 23 0040 •030Y WESTLAKE ST GREGG S I BETTE J PERL GREGG S PERL 304 WESTLAKE ST LONO LAKE NN 55354 TOTAL BATCH 503 OOOII I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATIDN DF INFOENATION AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION^ TO JHE BEST OF NY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. ^ / DATE/ c—^ T [ I . f,II \; ^ 1 i J MiMff Ml im 15 “ m r ^ 5r >• • • */It W»*#* 'i^-il\yi M <1 i^ii ilf‘ -V / tf. 4^V ^Wv "▼t£l1 rtf'.c .1: - I S'V .il'‘^rt iT 7Vc>^j I 1^ i*x-i« "Mi I -» ^ ♦ * ' -rrwf •>?t. '1“ •. ' ♦--'»#% ^ - laria. .^. • m i- :’ii iis ■' ;a Ti^ T I w ^ - V' • ' . . I '■ LiS. y.ifTT'.i^'i?' ^r^rE?f-e78iv Wiwiu zckz m*"rn -•-»•'• ▼ If ^ / /■ • / / - • 54 • • ^ f I. ' . ■ •’ - *■« 4 . f' * ( r -••, ; t r»« * -*l\ < **« ^ v-v ■m / f.T .. V. \ ' " **3Lp £; 1/47. TO: DATE RE: cc: Mayor Barbara Peterson and the Honorable Members of the City Council March 1, 2003 332 Westlake Street Proposal City Staff History of the property In 1988 we purchased 324 and 332 Westlake Street from two separate sellers, with the intent of eventually combining the separate properties into one and building a new home. We lived at 332 Westlake Street in an existing home from 1988 until 1993, at which time we built the home that exists today. In 1992 we met with City staff members Jeanne Maybusth and Mike Gaffron, who were at that time the zoning and assistant zoning administrators for Orono. We discussed our need to expand the size of our home in order to meet the demands of a growing family We were encouraged by staff to combine the two properties and build across them. Staff felt that combining the properties would bring them closer to the LR-1A zoning requirements, and that this would be looked upon favorably by both the Planning Commission and City Council when they were asked to grant variances for lot area, lot width, and side yard setbacks (the exact same variances that we are asking for today). In 1992 plans for the new home were drawn up. A portion of the existing house on 332 Westlake Street was to be retained (a 12' x 28' section that was orir•^.^)lly the kitchen and bed'’oom, and are now the dining room and entry). This portion was 12.7’ from the south property line. A new foundation with a greatroom above was added on the lakeside, and a new kitchen and covered entry porch were added on the street side. The existing house on 324 Westlake Street had no basement, so we proposed to move it and build a walkout basement with a recreation room on the lower level and an owner's suite above it on the main level, in addition, a sunroom was added to the lakeside. We designed a stone lighthouse tower as the central form of the house, and it bridged across the property lines. The existing garage, which crossed over the neighbor's property line by 2', was added onto to create greater depth for the cars. In retrospect, it seems we would have been better off to build a new house on each of the 50' wide properties, and then combined them into one This would have allowed us to have 10' side yard setbacks to the north and south, and when we combined the two separate houses we would have had an 80' wide house on a 100' wide lot Statement of Hardship The rezoning of our neighborhood in 1975 to LR-1 A with it's 2 acre minimum, 200’ of lake shore, and 30' side yard setbacks is in itself a hardship because it did not recognizing the existing conditions or the character of the established Westlake Street neighborhood. The Westlake Street neighborhood was composed mostly of 50' wide lots at the time it was rezoned to LR-1A Not a single lakeshore property on F AHI.KRS NKKillBORHUUU SOLUTION DUC Westlake Street was able to meet or conform to the new criteria at the time of the rezoning. Had the line separating the LR-1A district from the R-1A district been drawn just to the north and included Westlake Street, we would be required to have only one acre, 140' minimum lot width, and only 10' side yard setbacks, as do the homeowners on Tonkawa with similar lots. We feel that the rezoning has placed undue hardships on our neighborhood, and restricted our rights as property owners. A neighborhood solution Granting variances which allow 15' side yard setbacks for a 100' wide lot promotes lower density by encouraging other lakeshore property owners in the Westlake Street neighborhood to combine their 50' wide lots into larger parcels. Enforcing more restrictive side yard setbacks is likely to force the design of homes to become more massive and vertical in nature in order to take advantage of lake views from as many rooms as possible. In addition, the more restrictive the side yard setbacks are, the less economic incentive there is for property owners to combine their lots. Due to the more highly restrictive side yard setbacks imposed on a combined property the value of the combined lots would be less than the value of the two separate 50' parcels if they were to be sold separately. Precedent The precedent that would be set by granting variances which allow 15' side yard setbacks for a 100' wide lot in the Westlake Street Neighborhood is a positive one in that it promotes lower density by providing incentives for property owners to combine their 50' wide lots into larger parcels. We respectfully request your support on this issue Sincerely, ^ Blake and Mary Bichanich If you have any questions or would like to meet me at the site to review the project please call Blake Bichanich at 715-828-8037. r AMI I RS Nt:tOHB()RllOOD SOI UTION DOC EXISTING SITE PUN SCALE r=:50’*0’' \OCt 50* 50*W rKOPOseo site plan WITH EXISTING HOUSE O^RLAYED SCALE: 1“ = 50‘'0" 10O r PROPOSED SITE PLAN WITH. 16'SETSAOCS SCALE: l" = 50'-0" •• . ----------------. ----- •19 m f^mm11W ^ *%■» jjr ------------- . -n. i J, isp .................r- APPR0VEP51TEPLAN 20* SETBACKS SCALE: r = 50‘-0" 100* i efc/(c 1 PROPOSEP SITE PLAN lOCPLOTS SCALE: 1" = 50'-0" >1 TO: FROM: DAIE: RE: cc: Mayor Barbara Peterson and the Honorable Members of the City Council Lakeshore homeowners on Westlake Street March 1,2003 332 Westlake Street Proposal City Staff The purpose of this letter to the city is to demonstrate our support for the plans current homeowners Blake and Mary Bichanich have with a buyer, also from Orono, for 332 Westlake Street. We, as lakeshore homeowners on Westlake Street, have .eviewed the plans for a new home at 332 Westlake Street with the Bichanichs, and fully support them. The plans call for building a new home on or near the location of the existing home. We tolieve these plans are conducive to the future development of this neighborhood. We feel that 15' side yard setbacks for a 100' lot are appropriate and in keeping with the neighborhood. The rezoning of our neighborhood in 1975 to LR-1A with it's 2 acre minimum, 200 ’ of lake shore, and 30' side yard setbacks did not recognize the existing conditions or the character of the established Westlake Street neighborhood. Not a single lakeshore property on Westlake Street was able to meet or conform to the new criteria at the time of the rezoning, and not one conforms today. These existing lots are smaller than those lots the 1975 rezoning meant to address. We feel that the rezoning has placed undue hardships on the neighborhood, and restricted our property rights. Greater setbacks will act as a disincentive for any of us who may want to combine our properties in the future. If the City's goal is to reduce the density of the area, then they should encourage, not discourage the combination of any of the remaining 50' wide lots We respectfully request your support on this issue, and as a neighborhood we ask that you grant the Bichanichs the right to continue with 15' side vard setbacks as requested. Sincerely. UT»0 V Ovnd<.- D-'' n 'I -lomiin 4,^ o f? P UiiLERS NEiGHBORHOUD SUPPORT LETTER DOC Da^ Application Rccei^t-d: 1-16-03 Date Application Conildcrcd as Complete: 1-16-03 Initial 60-Day Review Period Eipires: 3-16-03 nr\t m \ 0 2003 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CilYUI- UHUNO Dale: March 3,2003 Item No.: Department Approval:Administrator Approval: Name: Michael P. GafTron Title: Planning Director Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #03-2865 Kevin Manley, 1973 Fagemess Point Road - Variancc/CUP - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IC, Single Family, Vi acre Lot Area: West of Road: 10,322 sf (0.24 ac) East of Road: 3,600 sf + (0.08 ac) (Based on straight extension of north lot line) List of Exhibits A - Resolution per Planning Commission Recommendation B - PC Memo and Exhibits of2-13-03 Application Summary Gustafson Design, Inc. on behalf of Kevin & Janet Manley, owners of 1973 Fagemess Point Road, has made application for: 1. Approval of af\cr-thc-fact lakeshorc setback, average setback and 0-75 ’ hardcover variances for constmetion of a 4.5'xl2 ’ (54 sO attached deck on the west side of the residence; 2. Approval of a 75-250' hardcover variance for a proposed deck above the garage tunnel, between the garage and the house; and 3. Approval of a 0-75 ’ hardcover variance for a proposed 20’x20' gravel parking area on the cast lakeshorc side of the property. Planning Commission Recommendation On Februarv' 19 Planning Commission voted 4-2 to recommends as follows: 1) Approval of 4.5 ’x 12’ deck on west side of house. 2) Approval of a walkway between house and garage not to exceed 4’ in width. 3) Approval of gravel parking area per staff recommendations indicated in memo dated 2-13-03. It was noted by applicant at the Planning Commission meeting that the proposal submitted for a 12’x24' deck bcl\y ecn the house and garage was incorrect, a result of miscommunication between applicant and his designer. The actual proposal is for a widened walkway between the garage and the house, much smaller than that shown on the submittal. Planning Commission concluded a 4' walkway would be suflicient given the large deck already existing above the garage. M03-2865 March 3,2003 Page 2 Planning Commission apparently concluded that the westerly 0-75' deck is supported by sufFicient hardship, is needed to serve the adjacent room and patio door, and will have no significant impact on neighbor’s views of the lake as well as no impacts as viewed from the lake, given the recently approved landscape plan which calls for trees along the extended north line of the house, which would soften the visibility of the deck. Planning Commission concluded that the gravel parking area is needed to provide off-streel vehicle parking for this property given the limited area for parking in the driveway. The minority opinion (Fritzlcr, Smith) was that insufficient hardships existed to support the westerly deck portion of the application, and that the submitted construction plans were inadequate to support the applicant ’s position that the deck had been approved. The resulting hardcover and structural lot coverage percentages based on the Planning Commission ’s recommendations will be as follows; Existing/Previonsly Approved Per PC Recommendation West 0-75’ Hardcover 1540/5861 = 26.3%1582/586) =27.0% 75-250' Hardcover 1120/4462 = 25.1%11' .'4462 = 26.4% East 0-75' Hardcover ± 650/3600 = 18% (incl. shed)400/3600= 11.1% (Shed must go, 20x20 portion of gravel may remain) Lot Coverage by Structures (using all 3 lones, based on straight easterly extension of lot boundaries) 1875/13,923 = 13.5%1931/13,923 = 13.9% Staff Recommendation Staff supports the Planning Commission ’s recommendation to approve the gravel parking area and a maximum 4’ wide walkway between the house and garage. While staff does not agree that the circumstances surrounding the deck on the west 0-75 ’ zone rise to the level of a hardship, there are compelling reasons to approve that deck, i.e it replaces a much larger previously existing deck, it won ’t impact neighboring views of the lake, and it’s visual impact from the lake is minimal. The mere fact that a patio door was shown on the approved plans, or that a depiction of the superimposed footprint of the deck appeared on the plan used for foundation work, would not be compelling reasons to justify the deck absent other compelling reasons noted above. In this respect, staff agrees w ith the minority position of the Planning Commission. However, in deference to the majority opinion, staff recommends adoption of the attacked resolution which reflects the majority recommendation of the Planning Commission. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt or amend the attached resolution which reflects the majority recommendation of the Planning Commission. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2; SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8; AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISIONS 16(C), 16(J) AND 16(L); AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER SECTION 10.03 SUBD. 19 - FILE #02-2854 WHEREAS, Kevin and Janet Manley (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1973 Fagemcss Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 7, Fagemess, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2; 10.55, Subdivision 8; and 10.56, Subdivisions 16(C), 16(J) and 16(L) and a conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subd. 19, to permit the construction of a gravel driveway constituting hardcover in the easterly 0-75' zone where no hardcover is normally allowed; to permit construction of a deck in the westerly 0-75' zone constituting structure and hardcover within 75' of the shoreline where no structure or hardcover is normally allowed, and constituting an average lakeshore setback encroachment where none is normally allowed; and to permit construction of walkway in the 75-250' zone constituting hardcover in e.xcess of 25% where only 25®/o hardcover is normally allowed. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #02-2865. The property is 10,322 s.f or 0.24 acres in area west of the roadway; formal acquisition of accretions east of the roadway would bring the total lot area to approximately 13,922 s.f or 0.32 acres. The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. Page 1 of7 -.... - .rneuaimma 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 19, 2003 and on a vote of 4-2 recommended approval of the requested variances to allow retention of an after-the-fact 4.5' x 12* deck in the westerly 0-75 ’ zone; construction of a 4' wide walkway between the house and the garage in the 75- 250* zone; and development of a 400 s.f. gravel parking area in the easterly 0-75' zone, based upon the following findings: a) The 20'x20* parking area is a reasonable request because the possible parking area in front of the garage is 1 7'-19' deep from the door to the traveled paved roadway. The average compact car is 14' long, and nothing longer than that could comfortably park in front of the garage without affecting traffic. b) With the road width being only 18' -20' wide, there is no ability to parallel park cars on the street. A parking area for two vehicles on the east side of the road would potentially be of benefit to the neighborhood as well as to the applicant in terms of safety and reducing congestion. c) In keeping with the variance standards of Section 1056 Subd.l6(J)(3), because cars will be parked very near the lake, applicant should provide shrubbery between the parking area and the lake for screening of vehicles, and the parking area should be limited to a depth of 25 ’ measured from the edge of the traveled paved road, yielding a 25-30 ’ lake setback, and the shed next to the lake which constitutes unnecessary structure and hardcover on the site should be removed. Applicant should also obtain any other agency permits necessary to allow the placement of hardcover near the lake. d) The westerly 0-75' deck is supported by sufficient hardship, because it is needed to ser\e the adjacent roo:n and patio door, and will have no significant impact on neighbor’s views of the lake as w ell as no impacts as viewed from the lake, given the recently approved landscape plan which calls for trees along the extended north line of the house, which would soften the visibility of the deck. Page 2 of7 f 4. 5. 6. Applicant has confirmed that the proposal submitted for a 12'x24' deck between the house and garage was incorrect. The actual proposal is for a widened walkway between the garage deck area and the house. Planning Commission concluded a 4* walkway would be sufficient to provide for safe pedestrian travel between the house and the above-garage deck, and a larger walkway is unnecessary given the large deck already existing above the garage. Planning Commission concluded the hardcover increases associated with the proposed parking area, deck and walkway are justified by the hardships noted. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance and CUP on the health, safety and welfare of the community. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantia! property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprchensi\e Plan of the City. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit for the proposed grading to create a parking area in the east 0-75 ’ lakeshore setback zones as proposed will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property, nor will such use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property w ill be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 3 of? r CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2; lO.SS, Subdivision 8; and 10.56, SuMivisions 16(C), 16(J) and 16(L) and a conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subd. 19, to permit the construction of a gravel driveway constituting 400 s.f. of hardcover in the easterly 0-75' zone where no hardcover is normally allowed; to permit construction of a 4.5* X 12' deck in the westerly 0-75' zone constituting structure and hardcover within 75' of the shoreline where no structure or hardcover is normally allowed, and constituting an average lakeshore setback encroachment where none is normally allowed; and to permit construction of a 4' wide walkway between the garage deck and the house in the 75-250' zone constituting hardcover in excess of 25% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed subject to the following conditions: 1. Hardcover and structure in the westerly 0-75' zone shall be limited to 27.0% as shown on the attached site plan and table. Any changes to the site plan shall be subject to further City review. Applicants and their contractors shall strictly adhere to the revegetation and planting plan approved for the westerly 0-75' zone in Resolution No. 4925 to ensure adequate screening of the deck as viewed from the lake. Applicant shall provide the Building Official with suitable plans for the 4.5' x 12' deck, shall obtain an after-the-fact building permit for the deck, and shall make any changes necessary to the deck to comply with building code standards. 2. Hardcover in the 75-250' zone shall be limited to 26.4% as shown on the attached site plan and table. Any changes to the site plan shall be subject to further City review. Applicant shall obtain a building permit if required by the building code for the 4' wide walkway prior to its construction. 3. Hardcover associated with construction of the parking area in the easterly 0-75' zone shall be limited to 11.1% as shown on the attached site plan and table. Applicant shall obtain a land alteration permit from the City and any other agency permits that may be required, prior to further work associated with the gravel parking area. The following additional conditions shall be met regarding the easterly 0-75* zone: a) Applicant shall provide shrubbery between the parking area and the lake for screening of vehicles, such vegetation to be established during the 2003 growing season; number and species of plantings to be approved by City staff. Page 4 of 7 t The parking area be limited to a depth of 25* measured from the edge of the traveled paved road, yielding a 25-30' lake setback. The gravel parking area shall be no closer than S' from the northerly and southerly lot lines. The shed next to the lake shaH be removed from the property by June 1, 2003. Failure to remove the shed shall constitute a violation of this approval. 4.Authorities granted by this variance and CUP run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a land alteration permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (March 10, 2004). 5.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 10th day of March, 2003. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner(s) Pages of 7 [itJhiiimiiiiiiiiiiiii STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10"' day of Februaiy, 2003 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of 2003 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 6 of 7 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of 20. .personally appeared before me. who is personally known to me whose identity I proved on the basis of whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation of __________________ a credible witness and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/tlieir free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of .. 20 .personally appeared before me. who is personally known to me whose identity 1 proved on the basis of whose identity I proved on the oath/afTinnation of ________________, a credible witness and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged tliat h»'she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public Page 7 of7 Dale Application Received: 1-16-03 Dale Application Considered as Complete: 1-16-03 Initial 60-Day Review Period Eipircs: 3-16-03 To:Chair Smith and Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Date: Subject: Mike Gaffron, Planning Director February 13,2003 S'lf ©■»5S. f '■Cos ^03-2865 Kevin Manley, 1973 Fagemess Point Road - Variance - Public Hearing Application Summary Gustafson Design, Inc. on behalf of Kevin & Janet Manley, owners of 1973 Fagemess Point Road, has made application for: 1. Approval of after-the-fact lakeshore setback, average setback and 0-75' hardcover variances for construction of a 4.5'x 12* (54 sO attached deck on the west side of the residence; 2. Approval of a 75-250' hardcover variance for a proposed 12'x23.5' (266 sQ deck adjacent to the garage tunnel; and 3. Approval of a 0-75' hardcover variance for a proposed 20'x20' gravel parking area on the east lakeshore side of the property. Zoning District: LR-IC, Single Family, Vi acre Lot Area: West of Road: 10,322 sf (0.24 ac) East of Road: 3,600 sf + (0.08 ac) (Based on straight extension of north lot line) List of Exhibits A - Application B-Survey (11-5-02) C - Site Layout Detail Sheet - Proposed Decks D - Site Layout Detail Sheet - Proposed Parking Area E - Plat Map F - Property Owners List G - Photos H - Hardcover Calculations I - Plans/Elevations from Prior Applications J - Assessors Records re: Prior Deck Pertinent Code Sections 1. 2. 3. 4. Section 10.22, Subd. 1(B) and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(C)1: Structure within 75'of OHWL: To permit the encroachment of an upper level deck 36' from the westerly shoreline. Section 10.22, Subd. 1(B) and Section 10.56 Subd. 16(C)6: To permit an encroachment into the average lakeshore setback. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(L)1: Hardcover in the 0-75' setback: To permit deck of 54 s.f. in the west 0-75' zone and gravel parking area of 4(X) s.f. in the easterly 0-75' zone. (42 sf is not over already approved boulder walls). Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56 Subd. 16(L)2: Hardcover in the 75-250' setback: To allow the construction of a 266 s.f. deck in the 75-250' setback, increasing 75-250' hardcover from 1119.7 s.f. (25.1 %) to 1386.2 s.f. (31.1 %). idUiOUiiaiSttBi r f 3^- #03-2865 1973 Fagerncst Point Road February 13,2003 Page 2 On December 9 Council reviewed the application for boulder retaining walls and briefly reviewed the other outstanding unresolved issues with the property. They indicated the shed on the east lakeshore must be removed and applicant w as advised to apply for variances for the parking area and the west deck. Such application has been made, but applicant has additionally included a request for additional hardcover for a deck in the area between the house and garage. Hardcover and structural coverage for a similar (but smaller) deck was denied in a prior application (File U 02-2778, Resolution No. 4788 adopted April 22, 2002). Because each of the three aspects of this request is in a separate hardcover zone, they will be treated individually for the sake of clarity. 1. Gravel Parking Area - East 0-75' Zone The most recent survey on file for the property (November 5,2002) indicates an easterly 0-75' zone of approximately 3600 s.f. based on directly extended lot lines to include the accretions east of the road right-of-way. Applicants submitted hardcover calculations incorrectly include road right-of-way in the area calculation. Staff has received no indication that Manley ’s title registration action to formalize their ownership of the accretions has been completed. Neither the survey nor the detail sheet indicate any angling of the north line to accommodate the neighboring property owners who expressed concerns at the PC meeting last fall. The result of this is that the total square footage of the east 0-75' zone is potentially not yet established, and therefore the percentage to be covered by gravel parking area is potentially subject to change. Assuming, how ever, that the shed will be removed as directed by Council, and that the only other hardcover in the east 0-75' zone is the 400 s.f. gravel parking area, this yields an easterly 0-75' hardcover of 11.1 %. The surv’ey suggests that the existing paved road surface ends about 8' from the edge of the right-of-way. This either means that the 20'x20' gravel area will add 28'deepx20'widc of hardcover, or it means that only 12' of the gravel will be on the property, with the remainder on the right-of-way. It’s unclear from the drawings what is proposed. Worst case is the 28'x20' scenario with the pavement being about 25' from the shoreline. The possible parking area in front of the garage is 17'-19' deep from the door to the traveled paved roadw ay. The average compact car is 14' long, and nothing longer than that could comfortably park in front of the garage without affecting traffic. With a road w idth only 18' -20' wide, there really is no ability to parallel park cars on the street. A parking area for two vehicles on the east side of the road would potentially be of benefit to the neighborhood as well as to the applicant in terms of safety and reducing congestion. The dow nside is that cars will be parked very near the lake. If Planning Commission concludes that a 20'x20' parking area is a reasonable request, and that the existing road and parking conditions as well as the location of the garage near the lot line all suppon a hardcover variance, then staff would suggest three conditions to any approval granted: #03-2865 1973 Fageracsi Point Road February 13,2003 Page 3 1. 2. 3. Applicant to provide shrubbery between the parking area and the lake for screening of vehicles. The parking area be limited to a depth of 25' measured from the edge of the traveled paved road, yielding a 25-30' lake setback. The shed next to the lake must be removed by a date certain to be established between Council and applicant, presumably as soon as the snow is gone. II. Lakeside Deck - West 0-75' Zone This 4.5 ’ X 12’ deck was constructed on west side of the house during remodeling. It was constructed without zoning or building permit approval, constituting 0-75' structure encroachment, an average setback encroachment, and excessive hardcover. The deck is 36' from the shoreline. This deck was not shown on any plans or surveys used in approval of prior zoning applications. It was not shown on any surveys or plans used to obtain the remodeling permit in September 2000. This deck first appeared on a plan used to obtain a permit for basement remodel and deck over garage in February 2002, however, this deck was not part of that plan review and the fact that it appeared on the plan is inconsequential. Staff can confirm that a 160 s.f. deck existed in the past (see Exhibit J, assessors records) but it was completely removed sometime prior to or during the remodeling process, and construction of the new deck has never been addressed. The deck constitutes additional hardcover and lot coverage above the limits established by City code. Unfortunately, the hardcover calculations submitted for the two earliest prior Manley applications do not quite coincide with those submitted for this request. The 0-75' calculations used for applications 2668 and 2778 show the house at 960 s.f with 60 s.f of flagstones and a 26 s.f entry landing for a total of 1046 s.f or 17.8%. The current proposal shows the house at 983.7 s.f, with the approved landscape plan adding 555.9 sf of boulder walls, stairway, etc. for a pre-deck total of 1539.6 sf or 26.3%. Approximately 42 s.f of the deck is not over approved boulder walls and its additional hardcover yields a new proposed total of 1581.6 sf or 27.0 %. tf’est 0- 75' Hardcover:Applications #2668 St #2778 Approved Retaining Waii St Landscape Plan, "Option 1 *' Current Proposal House 060 sf 983.7 sf 983.7 sf Stone Steps and Landings 26 sf 173.4 sf 173.4 sf Boulder Walls 382.5 sf 382.5 sf Flagstones 60 sf — De.k --------42 sf Total 0- 75' Hardcover 1046 sf 1,539.6 sf 1581.6 sf 0-75' Zone Area 5,860 sf 5,860.7 sf 5.860.7 sf 0-75' Hardcover Percentage 17.8%26J%27.0% #03-2863 1973 Fagerness Point Road February 13.2003 Page 4 The proposed deck serves a sliding glass door located 7-8* above grade. If the deck is not approved, the applicants will be required to permanently block the door with a railing or other method for safety reasons. The deck is at a location in the topography where it will have no significant impact on lake views enjoyed by the neighbor. The visual impact of the deck from the lake is minimal. No construction plans for the deck have been submitted. The applicants have not submitted a hardship statement and should be asked for their comments regarding the need for this deck. 111. Proposed Deck Between Garage and House - 75-250' Zone Applicants are proposing a 266.5 sf deck south of the house and extending toward the garage. This deck would be adjacent to the garage tunnel and would be 6' from the side lot line at its closest point. The deck constitutes additional hardcover. Again, no construction plans have been submitted for the deck, however it is assumed for discussion that no portion of the deck or its railing if one is proposed, will be more than 6' above existing grade and it would not constitute a lot coverage increase. If the deck has a railing it must meet a 10' setback from the side lot line. For discussion, it is assumed the deck will not have a railing and its platfomi elevation would coincide with the main floor elevation of the house. Pre-existing 75-250'hardcover is 1119.7 sfor25.l%. The proposed deck would increase hardcover to 1386.2 sf or 31.1 %. There does not appear to be any extraneous 75-250' hardcover that could be removed to mitigate the hardcover impacts of the proposed deck. 75-250* Hardcover Analysis Existing Proposed House 333.2 sf 333.2 sf Garage 558.4 sf 558.4 sf Driveway 74.6 sf 74.6 sf Sidewalk 153.5 sf 153.5 sf Deck 2>;^ 1 otal Hardcover 1119.7 sf 1^2 sf '-r. Area of Zone 4461.5 sf 4461.5 sf Hardcover Percentage 25.1 % / / Applicant has not provided a hardship statement, and should be asked to comment regarding the basis for this request and what hardship supports the hardcover variance necessary. Applicant should also be asked to confirm the assumptions regarding the railing and the height of the deck above grade. M3-286S 1973 Figcrness Point Road February 13,2003 Pages Statement of Hardship Applicants have not provided a statement of hardship. Applicants should be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Issues for Consideration I.Do the neighborhood impacts of not having sufficient parking available on street or on site act as a h^j'dship that supports the gravel parking area variance? 2.Does Planning Commission find any sufTlcicnt hardship to grant the hardcover, average setback and 0-75* structural encroachment to allow the deck on the lake side of the residence? 3.Are the staff assumptions correct regarding the nature of the proposed deck south of the house? Are there any valid hardships presented which support the hardcover variance necessary for construction of this deck? 4. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation Staff finds no hardship to support a hardcover variance for the deck on the south side of the house, and recommends denial of that request. Staff suggests that while the deck on the west side of the house will have minimal impact on lake views enjoyed by neighbors, and will have minimal visual impact from the lake, there is no apparent hardship supporting the existence of the deck. Staff recommends denial of this request, and removal of the deck within 60 days in addition to whatever measures are required by the Building Code to make the door safe. Staff supports the hardcover variance for the gravel parking area, based on the lack of on-street parking in the neighborhood, and recommends the following conditions of approval: 1. Applicant to provide shrubbery between the parking area and the lake for screening of vehicles. 2. The parking area be limited to a depth of 25' measured from the edge of the traveled paved road, yielding a 25-30* lake setback. 3. The shed next to the lake must be removed by a date certain to be established between Council and applicant, presumably as soon as the snow' is gone. Options for Action 1.Recommend denials/approval per staff recommendation and add any additional conditions you feel are appropriate. 2. Table for further information (specify). 3. Other. A CITY OF ORONO - VAl Application # ^ ^ Date Received" Amount Paid [mriiTX^lica ( (SSO.O^r leoeivaKVuia APPLICATION IniriiTX^Hcation Fee ^50.0^ each addiOoRaf^^anc^/^^^ RenovarVaiiance Fee $150.00 (no change fix)m original application) Variance for non-conforming structures S2S0.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address ^ 12^* Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)_ A A* ▲ •• A* m W —A'VWdlSAWWA mm •moAi^dV_________________ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired. I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: ___presidential ___pother (specify) Zoning District:^____________________________ .(month/year) APPLICANT Phone (home) ________ Phone (work) «^LV- g44 City:_^tt4/a6a_Vi^lA&i Zip: « OWNER (if different than wplicant)Phone (home). Address: ____ Phone (work) I. City:_______________Zip:_________ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: j/XOfs OfYiV (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Cover. __Average Lakesh Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: ______________________ (attach additional sheets if nece ♦ ' gtsjfnecc ^aryl y -T-.- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information muit be submitted bv the application deadline date in order for vour ■ppllcatloh to be considered complete: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Completed Application Form Certified Property Oivners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-5910). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8J4" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy SVi" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy S'/i" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this iq>plication.' Please remember that vour variance aPDlicatlon Is not complete if the above Information has not been Included. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) Md/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 da>-s before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings arc held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at ail scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. «V W‘- " ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO, S3UMS Hwy Nu 101 Minnetonka. MN SS345 rh«mc('»52)474 7%4 Fa»(‘752)474 X2ti7 SURVEY FOR KEVIN A JANET MANLEY^___ DRAFTED. November 5. 2002 • • v-4---------- SURVEYED November 2002 legal description _________________ Loi 7. FayemeNs, Hennepin County, Minnesota, ami the aceretioiiN lo said lot lyiiii* between the cxtenMoiis MiuiheuNterly to the shore of Lake Minnetonka of the northeasterly ami Miuthwcsierly lineN of saiil lot and southeasterly of the southeasterly Itne of Under the Linden Avenue, as dedicated in said plat, which soutlieasterly line is 40 feet southeasterly, as measured at nght anyles. from the southeasterly line of said lot LIMITATIONS* NOTES 1 Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal dcscnniion you furnished 2 Showing the locution of existing improvcfncnts wc deemed important. 3 Sening new monuments or venfying old monuments lo mark the comers of the property. 4. While wc show proposed improvements to your property, we are not as familiar with your plans as you are nor are wc as familiar with lire requirements of governmental agemcics as their employees are Wc suggest that you review the survey to confinn that the ^ proposals arc wlut you intend and submit the survey to such govenimemal agencies as may have junsdiction over your project to gain their approvals if you can STANDARD SYMHOLS * CONVENTIONS **• Denotes 1/2** ID pipe with plastic plug bcanng State License Number 9235, set, unless otherwise noted cS> 1 hereby certify tliai this pl^« specification, report or survey was prepared by me or undet my direct supcrx ision and that I am a Itceiucd PrufesMonal Engineer and Professional Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. H Parker I* E. & P.S. No. 9235 GRAPHIC SCALE w m DWG. NO. 0D0505 m s of the legal description you ; deemed imponani. Ills to mark the comers of the Dperty. we are not as familiar with cquirements of governmental review the survey to confirm that the io such governmental ageneies as may vals if you can. ite License Number 9235. set. unless Y* * $>>&■.<?<?• ^4^A .<5- n or .survey wa.s prepared by me or i.sed Prufcssional Engineer and : of Minnesota. ;CALE I s; 140.85 ^^45.66 X945:53-946-^ / / /l6 /^^944.03 X 943.11 / X94l X941. *943.11 '^CJc 1.97 ;"*2C>I 932.25 US' X r / < X931.48'; 929.71 SN^ 942.0 •» >- . •A "'Ohlot^ f f*cM^2^5 .A-l Add 2ft. Of soil & wall J°i2^*?bllsh original grade pnor to remodel 938J 938.3!939.5 TOW 937.5^0W Flagstone — Stoop ■^937.76 Gravel Rock Chilton Stone — Stoop wjO •• V . ( 4" solid PVCto daylight - 12" Drain kV^V !39fe T 937.6. 937> 4/ Black Eyed Susan 938.5 938.88 Granite Steps 938.5 ^38.88 938 i Lawn Area A \ / First Flush Drain Zone *N X Honeysuckle Mixed Purple Coneflower& B Eyed Susan 1/ Miss Kim Lilac ^938, X U-I)r' !v X I . j«*'. *•*'*, ‘-.tv- .r • • ’ t** **’v-«. J- /t- m- Parc9l Information .:* I #wc«l 1010117191 HottM Numtar 1079. . otTMt NanM PAommoo ooiNT no #2C\ ‘i . >* ’7a ■ ‘ V f '. i-1 * *0H OATS M/la/tt mtcn sw rao^ AOOR OWCR NMfC TAXTAVER NAHC/AOOR EROR ABDR (MRICR NAfK TAXPAVCR NAKC/ADDR “’^K-STKlEgT^”" •«"« “ 1**«R‘*» 14 •••« M47R PAOERNCSS POINT RO JOHN X PUROV ETAtjom K nmov ms PA8ERNESS PT RO NAVZATA m sssn M 1A-U7-M 14 AtM o‘?‘L. «*?*"**** *»e L EKLOP I C P LEE • OARV EKLOP / CATHY LEE 144S PAOCRHESS PT RD RAY2ATA HN sss^x to CO •ir nS.J i i" %- I M IR'llT'ES 14 ••17 •1Y71 EAGERNESS POINT RO jJ-J-, • t A OEUV *iT •' • * ®*lav14T1 PAOERNESS POINT RD NAY2AT4 HN SSSn Sa IO-I17-Z5 14 ••!• RSMS»J„“SK? r^” RAV2ATA HN SSSn' ^ REPORT NO. P14SS4A1 PACE S 3R la«117>ES 14 •••• .«2!?*** "® HANLEY OROTNERS CONST INCM*HLEY RROTNERS ^ SS *4* LIKIE CT EACAN HN SSIES TOTAL OATCH SA2 ••••$ representation op*mSwATlS'ASlf^APWAS OP THE HENNEPIN eaumnrMnn^^or^^mrV^* «CORO$OP HY RNOMLEOCE AW RELMP.^^ PROPERTY TAXATION. TO THE OE« DATE s- n-cz.tM yy^'A y i "n a ’.V?' ■^t ' 1 ■'i) r N C- • T * ^ , .4;-: '.^ci.vt F;' P r ' **• ..J . I p-'♦u ^,,, F r V A Jim^^ r pN^ <c^c3E.ai>rzi\’;‘ ■^ - Vp!^^ i •*-^ • . . T .'L'.'^'F r^x. ^ .« Ntfr* A. ft# - irf «i ■ ftft««>4 , • ^ \‘'\'M r.v,^.^.^, y, |L,) M • I >• \ i*» >- '< I 1973 tegtmess 3 JPG L 1 f‘-; •■-••': 1973 fagemast 6.JP0 1973ftigemess9.JPG 1973 fagemess 4. JPG ! • •» g**~.'v-.fM 1973 fagemess 7. JPG 1973 fagemess JPG ,P«^4r'3 1 i ^3 fagemess 5 JPG i. ^1 Hiin 1973 fagemess 6JPG 1973 fagemess-2 JPG f. / • I L'i.w f. »-*• i.% ji•n" V .'^ 'V. .V;: V *• 4 » v'- 'm yyj c X - :^-*:rK:-* ’’n:j • > V ■ ^ .. ;■ -;. :fm-^ ^ *>rv ->V< v-‘,-<% *'V-. A.S* • • xAa^W:^:^5gfciaift:£g^.,:>I: I :♦ ''^ ' V ~-j V..':7l.J;-... . . ^ . mm -i* »••V- ^• * . • . ‘ - » i t •■•«.• . - ^ ^ . . ... V * . *,> J^ *. * * \ ' ^ T ' • r^C ‘ ’ • ■•*»•' ■“• ' • '-V .'f*-.!. • . • . e^-V • - '. ,...4 ■ . '; is j,' J.% • •••• • s HABDCOVE^^^LCULATION WORKSBEET SETBA.CK 20NE: (CIRCLE ONE) f &-7j ) 75^0* 2S0-503*fr^J^00-1000' A. Hotti« ^ HARDCOVER PfgQfffl • • Lt«gA ■WMA ,3.fii/Zs.F. X X X S.F. S.F. .5.F. 5.F. w • •' • • • :.. B.* *Oans‘e • •_ •• ••* '• • :* x . • . • s.¥ * ’* . . ••• , • T“ •/ 6. IMvtwiy _ . ’ X • * • " ’ S.¥ P. Stdewdk X X E. Fado/Dede X X F. Ixadscape Uadetlala By Plastic Or Fdbcle X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTV AREA IN ZONE •A •• • • • • ■ •_____ + B .xiOO PROPOSED HARPCOVro Pf ZONE * A. House_____________X Lc^(h Width X X X B. Ganse C. Driveway De Sidewalk X X X X E. Pacio/Deck X X m. m F; Landscape Undeilaln By Plastic Or Fabric X X X Jl TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE total PROPERTY area Df ZONE' !.■■ ■->:■' r—* **' ® a •. ' ' .S • 1 i *^i.» i _xXOO « 1.' ..‘ -rj f . % • •4 V4 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SJ. SF. -_ll-SF. S.F. jg^iii—sF. /(j-7_ _5& S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. >-7S.4 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. f. r • • • . • • HAIO>CO'VER CALCULA! SETBACK ZOMEt (CIRCLE OME) 0-75* A. Hottte BABPCQYERPfZWB iRKSHEET 350-500* • • WMi X X X •* • s. ■ • •B. ' 'Oar^«- • • C. Drfvew^ • •• • .•••' •. :'-v: X • __ X __ • •• «• • • D. 3t4ew«Ik X X E. P«tIo/D«ck X X F. Ixndsc^ Uad«dala By Flude Or F«bile X X X O. Giber TOTAL HAKDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE +. B xlOO - A. House LiosA X X X B. Gartse C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Uoderialn By Plastic Or Fabric X X X 0. Other 500-1000*M'Z S.F. SB. S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE lOiAL PROPERTY Am INEQNB * '»T v;.* . ) XlOO ssaJL-s.f. fa S.F. S.F. fsy y S.F. •________S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. -___LlSF. S.F. < I 1^.7 S.F. S.F. % £H^.i^s.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 0^^,^ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. UUt^.< _SF. V* a . i •: / N A £ 4 B hardcover calculation worksheet EXISTING HARProvER in rnnir; A. House 75-250*250-500* Unfdi Wj4t^ X X X B. Oange C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underiain By Plastic X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + B PROPOSED HARDrnVKR IN A. House X 100 Length Width X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. OtherMM- X X X //'3 500-1000* S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SF. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. / / TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE B ^ if 00.0 S F. A X 100 - \ • t r ,9 •• • - •• M • • • fiPiJL IHL UC fgw IFPgR rLOaR. PUN - r-^ J - W\LS TO tVJ^ ^ :) - >CY/ IV-HX - MTV/ fWl^ - OMT^I—I PROVIDE TREATS PUTES WHEN LAVED aNCXINCREIE V- P6. ‘ o 2_. rS: 1/1" raiPAfigNs 0 LEU UA. tX^HOS. fC MAVC CON PE^fP TOR A MAXM>4 6^ rOWe PFESOP PSr >W A LATtFA. PRCC 45 rr wiL rc nt! RMP6»^MJTY Cr OTCR5 TP VCFr> CAFAC^t.^ a ca^KRL WPRK 6hAL TO ALL RC£?URa€Nr6 CT AC\ * b IKE56 5PCPTEP COi^. bU5T Ro^ nr, rojjHiVb frFco4TAecs cr ir* PAY OMTCSSiVC 5TTOJ&TM r CET^re r^W45 MAY tC TO^ RETANWCr WALL lO fTPXOr WPR?L N ftV- C)05r!N& ^:/>j6rRiig.rkgK fxwre 6TtP5 TP ee FS4PVCP a TTC Ca^VRACTOR 5T1ALL VCK PY rup or^:iv. all 6le6. Pf^CN5*PN6. eif:^ATKW5. LPtATk:^^. crp or QixcKre c tXSrUEf CCHSTRUOTlOi Whk^H / RCLATIVC TP TTC FEW PPN6TFUPTI^ b. ALL WVP-VfO » TYN& KTP OR eojtFm CXWrWD PPN5TRUPTIPN 6HALL f TELP CtrOA4!S PY TTC O^iTRA AP nM6trP TO T>C ^UtCX^NTRAorCR PFtOR TO fA&U^TXM AKf WC^ T>T VCRTEP PfuCNSkJFiS 6MAL ATTI AFP C€ NPrCP A6 SUCFI CW T}| 6T^ VRAHUb «MTTtP c TYC CYOffIK ttA6 MAPEAS5u.rri^wp nt 5tVPFC^ 7YC OOST^IP eUPMP$ AFP T>E5C ASOATTK ARC THAT TYD5 CUPrJ& WAS PCSierEP AFP C^TKIPTIP VI a^VTPPMlTY WTTh etW PtSOl Uk4S7RX)CrT\^ PR^TkES TYC Ca^HLACTOR SMALL TATC OmWRPNARY ffC^A/Tk^NS PFtSCMATXJU or : etix^e ciFfip pfx^nvN wi FCW C^WSTKIPTI^N W^ VT re ^lALL A£«r TP >^€U.C A PCSP^WS«t/TY rpR TYE PRCSSCRVATl^ or THS fFOPTP d TYC P^^TRAPT^ SrVLL nC ARPMfTCPT/tN&VEER M^c>ATn.y or any piscrcfa*. wmASiN p^OTQjpr^ W^XF^KTS ATC> /^TUl ftU? U^lTTiONS •7 Pr •• ftA DOS: J V • . (V OATK BUILDING PERMITS NUMfltR TYPE AMOUNT RENTALS-SALES OAxr.COM5IO.BUYER RENTS DATE MORTGAGES AMOUNT MORTGAGOR Extras: Fireplace Fireplace Range Oven Dishwasher Baths ____Fixt. i;;2$ m Ui it! ta■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■ BBaaBaBBBBBBBBaaaBBBaaBBBBBBBBHniMBBaaHHHHBaB lllz: t Dimensions Finished Bsm't_j^ W.O. Bsm’t__ Air Cond.___ ■SOQ Brick or Stone Trim. Drive__________ m , l£6 )Z3] L £/ Rate \Z. x_2& X X X X ■ ■ Ft, o gS*Vt.y ^ •'alut Totals SIAiS —— * fli ■ ______ s 1 _ X ■d>- ■ 1 Pof rh •1 1 1 _ 11 . 1 T»i- A « 2ft > -a ^*2^ « 4 ^ •a 1 H ) i Total Extras: 1 4 1 LAND: S ----- Extras: GaraatlCr CeMC __7^_ X_2i&_ > .^60 a Landieiplfif X •- e ■ r4^Qai ToUl Land $ PARTIAL □ Value of Improvemenl t ^CQQ Total Replacement Less Depreciation:Physcial Functional Economic Net Value Other Buildings Tv tal Vaiue Improvements Lind Value Total Estimated Market Value ZS1_% __________% __________% A. 7P S- OQ L&g,5]eo f Application Deadline: 01/24/03 60 Day Deadline: 03/25/05 MAH 1 0 2003 On I ur UMOWU REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: Name: Wendy Bottenberg Title: Zoning Administrator DATE: 3 ITEM NO. n Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #02-2870 Tim Vaughn - 205 Tonka Avenue Todd Ziesmer - 3440 Bayside Road Lot Line Rearrangement Exhibits: A Resolution B Staff Report and Exhibits of Februar>* 19,2003 Summary of Request: The Zeismer’s (owners of 3440 Bayside Road) and Roberta and Dan Vaughn (owners of 2051’onka Avenue) propose a subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement between the two lots. The Vaughn's are planning to sell 205 Tonka Avenue to their son Tim and family to build a single family residence on it. Prior to this, they want to make 205 Tonka Avenue parcel more conforming in size with the zoning district. 3440 Bayside Road is larger than the 2 acres required and 205 Tonka Avenue is smaller than the 2 acres required. The proposal is to move the south property line of 205 Tonka Avenue 65’ to the south. Currently, both lots are record lots and the lot line rearrangement will create new record lots. The lot at 205 Tonka Avenue is an oddly shaped lot that surrounds another property and is vacant. Both lots were originally developed prior to the adoption of the current zoning standards. The lot line rearrangement would meet the intent of the comprehensive plan because it w ould not iiicrea.se the existing density and would not create additiorial building sites. Variance: If the lot line rearrangement is approved, a variance will be granted at the same time for lot area, llie LR-1A zoning district requires lots to be 2.0 acres, the subject property w ill be 1.9 acres after the lot line rearrangement. PLANNING COMMISSION: Planning Commission recommended by a 6 to 0 vote to: Approve application as presented. 1 j STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the enclosed resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 3440 BAYSiDE ROAD AND 205 TONKA AVENUE FILE M2-2870 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the taws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Orono (hereinafter “City Council”) has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHERE.AS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement by Roberta Vaughn and Daniel Vaughn and Marie Zeismer and Todd Zeismer, (hereinafter “the subdividers”) of properties legally described as: Exhibit“B” WHEREAS, the properties consist of two developed parcels owned by the suhdividers shown on Exhibit “A”; and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Coiiimission held a public hearing on February 19. 2003, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the subdividers have completed all requirements of the City for a metes and bounds subdivision of a lot line rearrangement for division and combination purposes, resulting in the relocation ol the common lot boundary between the properties, as shown in the survey attached as Exhibit “A” resulting in a new legal description for each lot as shown in Exhibit “C”; and WHEREAS, the intent of the rearrangement is to make each lot more conforming in size in order to build a single family residence on Lot B. rearrangement. WHEREAS, Lot B is granted a lot area variance in conjunction with the lot line Page I of 6 'if WHEREAS, Lot B was substandard prior to and after the lot line rearrangement. Lot A and Lot B still meet the Intent of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Orono by not allowing additional building sites not meeting the permitted density. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the lot line rearrangement of the above referenced property by the subdividers as sho\Mi on the certificate of sur\ey by Mark S. Gronberg, a licensed sur\eyor of Gronberg & Associates, dated and revised March 5,2003, as attached in Exhibit “A”, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicants shall provide a title opinion for the property confirming ownership and encumbrances. 2. Applicants shall dedicate to the public an appropriate drainage and utility easement along the new property line. 3. The aforesaid division shown on the attached Certificate of Survey shall be filed by the City of Orono with either the Hennepin County Recorder’s Office or Registrar of Titles Office ou or before September 10,2003 together with a certified original copy of this resolution. 4. The approval granted by this resolution shall expire if the division has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adonted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota this 10*** day of March, 2003. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Page 2 of 6 •' V STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of March, 2003 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESO: A COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this___ by Linda S. V'ee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. day of March, 2003 Notary Public i'lr Page 3 of 6 PROPOSED LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR DANIEL VAUGHAN k TODD ZIESMER IN LOTS 5 k 20. AUD. SUB. NO. 203, AND SECTION 6-117-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA )' \ i A D N. V i !!1aysiirs »«B'* si%rj?*** I C') ..-^A 'K ^ I ••• i • Xi« L/ ^ ► -f -“i-n I I I d c'- M ' 'I U/ -I I '\i, f 1/ itsy ^ ADdlTiON MiNNt*.TONKA.' (7."-*( <7 •/// I 1 « tllJF M r.v*— scale FEET IfSI •jjim:m t!2fd V«l|hifiSi•Ml t} •;! r';‘l c I fl ia 4 Exhibit B EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS- Parcel A giesmert That part of Government Lot 3, Section 5, Township 117 North. Range 23 West of the S’" Principal Meridian, described as foflows; Beginning at a point distant 1658.25 feet West of the East line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 5, Township 117 North. Range 23 and distant 1056.0 feet North of the South line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 5; thence East parallel to the South line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 235.73 feet; thence South and parallel to the East line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 373.9 feet; thence West and parallel with the South line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 117.87 feet; thence Soutfi and parallel with the East Nne of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 259.25 feet to the center line of County Road; thence Westerly along center line of said road a distance of 117.9 feet to a point distant 1658.25 feet Wbst of the East line of said Northeast Quarter, thence North and parallel to the East line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 627.75 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPT that part of the above described tract described as follows: The South 100 feet of the North 373.9 feet of the East half of Lot 20, Auditor's Subdivision Number 203. Hennepin County. Minnesota. Parcel B fVauqhanI Lot 5. Auditor's Subdivision Number 203. EXCEPT that part of said Lot 5. described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest comer of Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka; thence Northerly along a line which is the Northerly projection of the Wbslerty line of Block 3. ^yside Addition to Lake Minnetonka, to a point which is 40 feet Southwesterly from the Southwesterly line of the Minnesota Western Railroad Company right of way. measured at right angles therefrom; thence Southeasterly along a Nne drawn parallel to the Southwesteriy Nne of said Minnesota Western Railroad Company right of way and 40 feet distant Southwesterly therefrom, measured at right angles, to the point of intersection of said Nne with the Northerly projection of the Easterly Nne of Block 3, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka; thence Southerly along said Northerly projection of the Easterly Nne of Block 3, Bayside Addttion to Lake Minnetonka to the intersection of said Nne with the Northerly Nne of Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka; thence Westerly along the Northerly Nne of Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka to the point of beginning. Page 5 of 6 Ad Exhibit C PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS; Parcel A (Ziesmert That part of the following described property That part of Government Lot 3, Section 5, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5"* Principal Meridian, described as follows; Beginning at a point distant 1658.25 feet West of the East line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 5, Township 117 North, Range 23 and distant 1056.0 feet North of the South line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 5; thence East parallel to the South line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 235.73 feet; thence South and parallel to the East line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 373.9 feet; thence West and parallel with the South line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 117.87 feet; thence South and parallel with the East line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 259.25 feet to the center line of County Road; thence Westerly along center line of said road a distance of 117.9 feet to a point distant 1658.25 feet West of the East line of said Northeast Quarter, thence North and parallel to the East line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 627.75 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPT that part of the above described tract described as follows; The South 100 feet of the North 373.9 feet of the East half of Lot 20, Auditor's Subdivision Number 203, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies Southerly of the Northerly 65.25 feet thereof. Parcel B (Vauahanl Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision Number 203, EXCEPT that part of said Lot 5, described as follows; Beginning at the Northwest comer of BayskJe Addition to Lake Minnetonka; thence Northerly along a line which is the Northerly projection of the Westerly line of Block 3, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka, to a point which is 40 feet Southwesterly from Ihe Soulhwesterty line of the Minnesota Western Railroad Company right of way, measured at right angles therefrom; thence Southeasterly along a line drawn parallel to the Southwesterly line of said Minnesola Western Railroad Company right of way and 40 feet distant Southwesterly therefrom, measured at right angles, to the point of intersection of said line with the Northerly projection of the Easterly line of Block 3, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka; thence Southerly along said Northerly projection of Ihe Easterly line of Block 3, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka to the intersection of said line with the Northerly line of Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka; thence Westerly along the Northerly line of Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka to the point of beginning. Also, the Northerly 65.25 feet of the following described property; That part of Government Lot 3, Section 5, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5*^ Principal Meridian, described as follows; Beginning at a point distant 1658.25 feet West of the East line of Ihe Northeast Quarter of Section 5, Township 117 No; *.h. Range 23 and distant 1056 0 feet North of Ihe South line of Ihe Northeast Quarter of said Section 5; thence East parallel to the South line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 235.73 feet; thence South and parallel to the East line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 373.9 feet; thence West and parallel with the South line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 117.87 feet; thence South and parallel with the East line of said Nortlteast Quarter a distance of 259 25 feet to the center line of County Road; thence Westerly along center line of said road a distance of 117.9 feet to a point distant 1658.25 feet West of the East line of said Northeast Quarter, thence North and parallel to the East line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 627.75 feet to the point ot beginning EXCEP1 that part of the » i 1 Exhibit D PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS: Parcel A (Ziesmert A 10.00 foot wide drainage and utility easement around the perimeter of the following described property: That part of the following described property: That part of Government Lot 3, Section 5, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the S”' Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at a point distant 1658.25 feet West of the East tine of the Northeast Quarter of Section 5, Township 117 North, Range 23 and distant 1056.0 feet North of the South line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 5; thence East parallel to the South line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 235.73 feet; thence South and parallel to the East line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 373.9 feet; thence West and parallel with the South line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 117.87 feet; thence South and parallel with the East line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 259.25 feet to thj center line of County Road; thence Westerly along center line of said road a distance of 117.9 feet to a point distant 1658.25 feet West of the East line of said Northeast Quarter, thence North and parallel to the East line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 627.75 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPT that part of the above described tract described as foHows: The South 100 feet of the North 373.9 feet of the East half of Lot 20, Auditor's Subdivision Number 2U3, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies Southerly of the Northerly 65.25 feet thereof, EXCEPT along the most southerly line of the above described property, where the drainage and utHity easement is to be the south 43.00 feet of the above described property. Parcel B fVauQhanI A 10.00 foot wide drainage and utility easement around the perimeter of the following described property: Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision Number 203, EXCEPT that part of said Lot 5, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest comer of Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka; thence Northerly along a line which is the Northerly projection of the Westerly line of Block 3, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka, to a point which is 40 feet Southwesterly from the Southwesterly line of the Minnesota Western Railroad Company right of way, measured at right angles therefrom; thence Southeasterly along a line drawn parallel to the Southwesterly line of said Minnesota Western Railroad Company right of way and 40 feet distant Southwesterly therefrom, measured at right angles, to the point of intersection of said line with the Northerly projection of the Easterly line of Block 3, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka; thence Southerly along said Northerty projection of the Easterty line of Block 3, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka to the intersection of said line with the Northerly line of Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka, thence Westerly along the Northerly line of Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka to the point of beginning. Also, the Northerly 65.25 feet of the following described property. That part of Government Lot 3, Section 5, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5*^ Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at a point distant 1658.25 feet West of the East line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 5, Township 117 North, Range 23 and distant 1056.0 feet North of the South line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 5; thence East parallel to the South line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 235.73 feet; thence South and parallel to the East line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 373.9 f''*'* thence t/'<est and parallel with the South line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 117.87 feet; thence South and parallel with the East line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 259 25 feet to the center line of County Road; thence Westerly along center line of said road a distance of 117.9 feet to a point distant 1658.25 feet West of the East line of said Northeast Quarter, thence North and parallel to the East line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 627.75 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPT that part of the above described tract described as follows: The South too feet of the North 373.9 feet of the East half of Lot 20, Auditor's Subdivision Numbe-* 203, Hennepin County. Minnesota. TO;Chair 1 lawn and Orono Planning Commission Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: Wendy Bottenberg, Zoning Administrator/Planner February 14,2003 SUBJECT: #03-2870 Roberta Vaughn and Tim Vaughn - 205 Tonka Avenue/3440 Bayside Road Subdivision of a 1-ot Fine Rearrangement — Class 1 Subdivision - Public Hearing 2Loning District:LR-1A One Family Lakeshorc Residential District Lot Area: (Existing)3440 Bayside Road 205 Tonka Avenue 2.35+ acres 1.55+ acres Lot Area: (Proposed)3440 Bayside Road 205 i onka Avenue 2.0+ acres 1.9+ acres Required Minimum Lot Size 2.00 acre List of Exhibits A B C D E F G Application Plat Map SuiA cy/Proposed Property Line Sewer Maps Letter from applicant Site Topography Property Owners l.ist Summary of Request: The Zeismer's (owners of3440 Bayside Road) and Roberta and Don Vaughn (owners of205 Tonka Avenue) propose a subdivision of a I.ot Line Rearrangement between the two lots. The Vaughn ’s are planning to sell 205 Tonka Avenue to their son 1 im and family to build a single family residence on it. Prior to this, they want to make 20^ Tonka A\enue parcel more conforming in size with the zoning district. 3440 Bayside Road is larger than the 2 acres required and 205 'Tonka Avenue is smaller than the 2 acres required. The proposal is to move the south property line of 205 Tonka Avenue 65' to the south. Currently, both lots are record lots and the lot line rearrangement will create new record lots. llie lot at 205 Tonka Avenue is an oddly shaped lot that sunuunds another property and is vacant. <»03-2870 Vaughn 205 Tonka Avenue Tebruaiy 14.2003 Page 1 of 4 -’Tsa . a*a Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.23 LR-IA One Family Lakeshore Residential District Lot Area 2 acre Lot Width 200 feet Front Yard 50 feet Side Yard 30 feet Rear Yard 50 feet Lot Area and Yards: 3440 Baviide Road Existing Lot Size ! ot Width 2.35 acres 120 feet Proposed Lot Size Lot Width 2.0 acres 120 feet 205 Tonka Avenue Existing Lot Size Lot Width 1.55 acres 180 feet Proposed Lot Size Lot Width 1.90 acres 245 feet Note that 205 Tonka Avenue width is measured at the 50’ setback from the portion of the property that wraps behind 225 Tonka Avenue. The front yard for administrative purposes (due to the odd lot shape) is the east yard abutting the rear yard of the Tonka Avenue lots. Both lots were originally developed prior to the adoption of the current zoning standards. The lot line rearrangement would meet the intent of the comprehensive plan because it would not increase the e.\isting density and would not create additional building sites. Hardcover: 3440 Bayside Road 1 he property lies in 75-250’ of Lake Minnetonka. Propo>sed Lot size: 2.0 acres (87,120 s.f.) Allowed HC: 21,780 s.f. (25%) Proposed Hardco\ er: 3,852 s.f. (4.42%) plus driveway. 205 Tonka Avenue The property lies in 250-500’ of Lake Minnetonka Proposed Lot size: 1.90 acres (82,764 s.f.) Allowed HC: 24,829 s.f. (30%) <103-2870 Vaughn 205 Tonka Avenue February 14.2003 Page 2 of4 1 Proposed Hardcover: The proposed residence is still being designed. The hardcover should not be a problem even when the driveway is included. Variance: If the lot line rearrangement is approved, a variance will be granted at the same time for lot area. The LR-1A zoning district requires lots to be 2.0 acres, the subject property will be 1 .90 acres after tlic lot line rearrangement. Access: Access for the 3440 Bayside Road property is oiTBayside Road. Access for 205 Tonka Avenue will be offTonka Avenue. The driveway will be long and wind around the propertv line as indicated on E.xhibit C. Front/Back lot split: This lot line rearrangement was not reviewed as a front/back lot split, although if has many characteristics of such a split. If it w ere, the following issues would have to be considered: I. Ip. a front/back lot split a 30’ corridor is required for access to the back property: 1 liis property has access from Tonka Avenue. If an outlet was created for access, the land dedicated for the outlot would not be credited to the lot area, therefore the lot would be .smaller and be more non-conforming than being proposed. Because the lot surrounds another property, there is plenty of space for the driveway in the 40 ’ corridor. 2. In a front/back lot split the front yard setback is 75*: ( This is the LR-IA zoning district and 50* is required, 150% is required of setbacks for front/back splits). As indicated on the sur\ey. the front yard setback is proposed to be 50'. The placement of the residence would be at least 50’ from the cast property line. The residence located at 275 Tonka Avenue is located 60 ’ from the rear property line for a total 1 1 0* of separation for the residences. The applicant is proposing to place the new residence at the high point on the property (southeast corner). Placement of the residence there is directly behind the residence at 225 fonka Avenue. There is a line of mature trees which separates these two properties. The mature trees consist of oaks and evergreens. I he evergreen Uces will screen the two residences. However, with the residence being constructed at 205 Tonka Avenue and the driveway wrapping around, there will be more acti\ ity behind 225 Tonka Avenue. «03-2870 Vau'ihn 205 Tonka Avenue Februar> 14.2003 PaL»e 3 of 4 Will the 3440 Bayside Road property ever be redeveloped? If it were to occur, the new residence could be placed where it is currently located to continue to enjoy lake views or it could be placed further back on the lot at an angle behind 225 Tonka Avenue. Sew er Review: The property located at 3440 Bayside Road is currently sewered. The property located at 205 Tonka Avenue has sewer available at two different locations. When the sewer project for the neighborhood was put in, sewer went up Tonka Avenue. Sewer goes to 205 Tonka Avenue where the driveway is proposed to be located (See Exhibit C). The owner of225 Tonka Avenue applied for and was granted approval to move the utility easement to the south end of the property in order to construct a new residence on the property. The utility easement is 2C’ wide along the south property line of that property. The City Engineer and Public Works Director discussed the best location for sewer to the Vaughn property. They reviewed the location of sewer lines, depth of pipes and felt the sewer should be brought to 205 Tonka Avenue via the utility ea.semcnt along the south 20’ of 225 Tonka Avenue. Staff Recommendation: Staff is recommending approval of the lot line rearrangement subject to the following conditions: 1.Applicant shall dedicate drainage and utility easement along new property lines and vacate any drainage and utility easements along old property lines. 2.Applicant shall provide to the City any documentation relating to easements on hath properties. 3. Prior to City Council review 3 original copies of the survey completed by a licensed surv eyor in tlie State of Minnesota shall be submitted, w ith signature blocks. 4.Setbacks for tne residence to be constructed at 205 Tonka Avenue shall be as shown on the survey dated 12-2-02. #03-3870 Vaughn 20S Tonka Avenue Februarv 14, 2003 Page 4 of 4 Jin-l3-W0J OMOm FfMrtITY of OPMO ♦9S33494SI6 T-747 P 014/021 F-940 Application # Date Received -r) ?> Amount Paid ( odTJ^OQ CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISIOX APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site address fk^{e PropertyldentificationNumberiPID) OS' /<7 Z-3 »J oct>3/ qT in 2*^ r..>i ? Please check one - Property X abstractor torrens? ^ Attach legal description lo application. APPLICANT Name ***T^v*^ Vaw•9^^»^ Address 77 zy P>v4ss«»n> e^l City___Phone (home) Zip SS73I Phone (work) 6tz~2i7-74*:7 OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Address__d City____ g 3440 (^wSivtc S./^Phone (home) 7^7-snUo 7 (attach list if more than one) Zip553St Phone (work) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) Present Zoning District Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify)______ PROPOSAL . Division for Tax Purposes —, X— L®t Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) _________Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites I Existing Units ___« New Units '2- Total Units Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) Units per___Acres Sq. Fl Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specif') X *.t L f; !■! S • 4 • Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Department -’•'v 05^ ny- ^3- rr* 11:1 Parcel Information >are«l ID 0811723131 Houm Numbar 38 Straat Naina ADDliesS UNA88IONEO This it not»l$g§lfy ncofdtd m»p H npnsona a compOation of MormsSon •nO data hxmOty. County, and SMa road aulftoribas and otharaoufcas. ifa saT fir / N \ \ N / / / /6|p / Y BuMing Mtbock Htmi 1.9+ ACR / H---------- \ s T South Soc. 5 ' S PROPOSED DIVIDING LINE \S e»*4«’ 40" E 235.74 Oroinogo and ------^ utBty oooomonts i I - Llnoo porqloi with Coot lino of »C 1/4.xSoc. 5 / r -••••» J.. .1I'«: Noxtonoi oit, Ino at Bte [BAisOE AO^ MMNETONK \t A :••• A T i" i‘i 'BLOCK Coot hno of Block 3, *• "BAYSOe AOOmON TO LAKE MMCTOMCA" 1-ake. - V - T ' - - BROI / 8.- S i Mi ^ V ^ *^c**c^ I ?S:'4 s i • — - PROPOSED LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR DANIEL VAUGHAN &c TODD ZIESMER IN LOTS 5 & 20, AUD. SUB. NO. 203, AND SECTION 5-117-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA W .1. t - '{-------i?i‘_'‘_-:rr-'»Trrrrr -----r - ’ .L._ • . ^ ^ V • ; i .......... o. f- V -»• • •w I'Co 0 ■,'«—?? .^')'•*’■ ^imr4(^hyt^t7M9m T i./ul''C^“- ‘'•I-'' ^ " ~’»'4 ' I —1,1« K ... 'ffl' ^rV: !i^; iC)N.-.vQirvt- ^ '•'••••••■....... •1*. : ...••..•♦•• na- ■ ONKa^' ■Sff •SLJX U-T I.........1...................... ^ int>i^ V itijr \ i I F.XISTINC LEGAL DESrKIPTIQNS Thai ptft erC^ncrmncM Lui 3. SeanM 5. Tuwnthip 117 Nunh. IUnp< 71 Wen of iht S* Principal Mcridiaii, described as follows Ocpimitiiy ai a potni distant I65t 25 fc«t West uf the East line of the Nonbcait Quaner of Scctnn S. Township 117 Nonh. Range 23 and disUM lOSd 0 (mi Noflh of the South line of the NoAhcMt Qu^er of said Scctioii S. ihaote East parallel 10 the Sooth line ofsaidNonhoasi (planer a distance of 33 5 73 feet, thence South and paraUd to the Eao line of said Noitheast Quaner a distance of 373 9 feet, ihenca West and paralM «ith the South line of said Nonheast Quaner a distance of 11717 feet; thence Sotfh at J parallel with the Lot line of saiJ Northeast Quaner a diuance of 259.25 (im to the center line of CouMy Road, thence Westaly along center line of road a distanee of 117 9 feet to a poioi distam I65t 25 feet West of the Cast line of laid Nonheast Quaner. thence Nonh and paraflel to the East line of said Nonhaast Quaner a distance of 637.75 to to the point ofbeginaing. EXCEPT diet pan of the abo%e described tract described as follours The South 100 to of the Nonh 373 9 feel of the East half of Lai 20. Audnofs Subdimston Number 303. Hennepin County. Minncaou Lot 5. Audiiori Subdivision Number 203. EXCEPT ibai pan uf sard Lot 5. dcKnbed as followa BegiMUi^ ai the Nonbwcsi corner of Oayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka. Ihenca Nonherly niong a hne which is the Northerly projeuion of the Westerly line of Olock 3. Bayaide Addinoa to Lake Mumeionka. .o a poim which is 40 to Soothwasiarty ihim the Souihweaiarly line of the Minnesota Westcni Radruad Company nghi of tvay. meaiurfd at right angles therefrom, ihence SootheasKrfy along a line drawn panllel to the Soothwtsicrl) line of uid Minncfuta Western Railr^ Company nghi of way end 40 to dioani Southwesterly Uiercfiom. measured at nghi angles, to the poini of mtcrscaion 01 said Knc with iht Nonhtrly pro|cction of the Eanerty line of Block 3. Bayside Addaiea to Lake Minneionka. ihcnec Southerly along said Nonherly pn§teiion of the Eancrly line of Block 3. Bayside Addnurn to Lake Mmnetonka to the intersaciion of said line wish the Nonharly line of Bayside AiMiuon to Lake hlmnetonka. thence Weatarly along the Northeily line of Bayside Addition to Lake Mnuicionka to the point of beginmng. SCALE mimiMi FEET PHOt*OSi:ij i SCAi DR>{ klKt lUNS That pen of the following described prupertv Thsi pan of CovernA4.(U Lot 3. Scamn S. lowntlup 117 North. Range 23 We»i of the 5^ Princtpel Meridian, described at fellows tkginning at a point dtsum 165125 to West of the Ean line of the Nonhcao ()i^cr of Saaion 5. Township 117 Nonh. Range 2) and distant 1056 0 to Nonh of the South hne of the Notthenai Quarter of aaid Section 5. thence East parallel to the South fine of said Northeast (^tarter a diaanc^ of 335 73 ren. thence South and parattcl to the Eaa line of said Nonheaat Quarter a distance of 373 9 to. Ihenca Wca tnd parallel with the South fine of uid Nonheau Quaner a dtuanca of 117 67 fact, thanc e South and parallel urith tht East fine of uid Nonhcaa Quarter a dimoca of359 35 to to the earner line of County Road, ihcncc Westerly aloigi center liie of uid road a distanea of 117.9 to to a point distant 1656 25 feat Warn of the Can fine of uid Nenheafl Quaner. thence Nonh mid pmalW to the East fine of uid Nonhcaa Quarter • diaanee of 627 75 to to the poim of beghming. EXCEPT iha pin of the above described tract described u feaowK Tbi South 100 feet of Iht Nonh 373 9 to of the Eaa half uf Lot 20. Audiioi*s Subdivisaoo Nuafecr 303. Hennepin County. Ktinncsoia. wbich fics Soudarly of the Northerly 65 35 to thereof Pirtil B fViMiribm Lot 5. Abdkor*s Subdivision Number 203, EXCEPT that pan of said Lot 5. described u feBoweBegmamg a the Konbwea corner of Bayside Addmon to Lake MmhmoNu. ibeact NorthcHy aloaf a line which is the Nonherly proycoion of the Woaarly lioaof Block 1. Bpyiida Addition to Lake Mmnetonka. to a point which is 40 to Soulhwcaarly trom the Souihweacrly line of the Mimicsota Wcsirm Railroad Company rigln of way. masiurec u right anglM therefrom, ihmci Southeaurriy along i line drawn peraltcl to the Souikwcacrly fine of uid Mimiesuta W «*irnt Railroed Company right of way and 40 to dluani Sooihweaeity themVom, measureJ at nghi angles, to the pomi ofimcraaction of sM hne with the NonhcHy preycawn of the Easterly luie of Block 3. Beyiide Addilioa to Lake Mianet owks. Ihence Southerly Jung said Nonherly proiaciion of the Easterly line of Olock 3, Bayside AddiiioH to ijie Minoctonks to the mtauaciion afsaid line with the Nonherly line of Bayside Addition to Lake Minneionka. thence Westerly along the Northerly Iim of Baysi^ Addnion to Lake Minnetonka to the pomi of heginruag. Alio, tha Nonharly 65 35 fc«i of the fellow ing dcecnbnJ propcnjr That pan of Cocemmcni L« 3. Saamn 5. Towndup 117 North. Rai^ 23 West o^thc 5* Pnncipal Meridian, described a» lidlowf Uegmning at a poim dIsum 1656 25 to W'esi of the Ean line ol'ihe Nuitheasi Quarter of Section 5. Tawitship 117 Nonh. Range 33 and dtstam 1656 0 to Nonh of the South fine of i>e Nonheast (Xuncr of said Section 5. thence East parallel to the South fine of uid NonhetM QtsMntr a dtsuncr of 335 73 to. ihence SouUi to paraRel to the East hne of uid Nonheast Quaner s d.i'ance o« 373 9 icci. ihence West to psraRcl with the South hne of uid Nonheast Qusner a dmanee of 11717 to. th^ S^ to parallel woh the East line of Konhean Quaner e distance ^ Weaterly ator^ cemei uf 117 9 icet ui 4 imnti d,u4ie Iu5l 25 feet Wm <n ^Nonheau l>»aiui ilietHc Ncuth to pnaficl to the Lan hue ^ ** dcKfibed tree dcKfiOed «s feOmrs The South f lull of to, n. Noaiber 203, Hennepui Coumy. Minneioia IS i i«-iS3 4 ♦' f ^0 JSnoN : .... .4 \/ r *’'-v fs # • i 0r*r- 8- — i*-" CP ■ B*| JsnoN! • f ..............-11 1##L 1 O)0 • t 1 I '.'N i / • © »% ; \ ojooo* m c fiQfn*«rfl4 Afchll«clt St. Paul. MInnasota llaquofi. WIiconaia 1 KWf irr Cl HUY »HAf fnrs t\fm »AS a** UC OP UI40CP irr mcf SuPpr^iSiON «M> iHAf 1 AM A ouiT pccrsrraro pportssiONAi taciNrcp iphjcp ih ( iA*s or tmc su <c or MiMirsoiA. suavtY PX »t^ JN 0*T omann urj RECORD PLAN 1/97 orsicMio cac APPPOYCO cac Dtrc »« •■ '•»? Wf. M ««•OATC riB r. Iff? fifoirsipco MtfM» 1 isiocuirv tc roMM \iM\*39S?\»3i>37COOaC ^ 2/2/200) 2i4* 2M FMMi y52.4'*l.«4'l4 TO! 24T-4010 rMBt 001 OF 001 February 2,2003 Ms. Wendy Bottenberg 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Fa)c (9S2^ 249-4616 Dear Ms. Bottenberg, SUBJECT: ZONING APPLICATION #03-2870 NARRATIVE OF PROPOSAL This letter is in response to your request for a short narrative of our proposal for review by the planning conunission. My mothei, Roberta Vaughan, owns the property where we are requesting a lot line rearrangement and variance. My wife, Natalie, and I are planning to acquire this property from my mother in order to build a new home in 2003. We are currendy working with Lundgren Bros. Custom Home Division to finalize plans for the home. We anticipate the home will be a 2-story with finished square footagje on the top two floors of approximately 3,400 square feet. I would like to thank you for your continued assistance and guidance with this application. Sincerely, Tim Vaughan 2725 PHEASANT ROAD ORONO, MN 55331 1 5 RUN DATE fl/17/A3 DATCN 512 NCNNEflN COUNTY RROfERTY XHTORNATION SYSTEN fROfERTY OWffRS LIST REfORT m. PI4354I1 PAGE 55 PROP ADOR ONNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 38 •5-117-23 11 •••5 ••••5 LEAF ST E C 6RAHAN JR E C CRANAN JR ^5 LEAP ST LONG LARE NN 5535A 36 65-117-23 12 9013 ••2f« REDERUOOO DR ALISNAN S AZAD ALISHAN S AZAD 299 BEDERWOOO DR LONG LARE NN 5535A 36 f5-117-23 12 991S •••36 ADDRESS UNASSXGNED STATE OF NINN DNR REAL ESTATE N6NT ATTN DE66IE GURTXN 566 LAFAYETTE RD ST PAUL NN 55155 PROP ADDR ONNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR •5-117-23 12 ••lb •••i8 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE OF NINN DNR REAL ESTATE NGNT ATTN DE66IE GURTIN 566 LAFAYETTE RD ST PAUL NN 55155 36 •5-117-23 12 ••17 03A15 NIGN LA RICHARD G NARRLUND ET AL RICHARD GUSTAV NARRLUND I NINA E GUERTIN-NARRLUNO 3A15 HIGH LA LONG LARE NN 55356 36 65-117-23 12 •621 •3665 CHRISTINE DR N H A C 0 HAG6ERO NARIE H t CARLTON 0 HAG6ERG 3A65 CHRISTINE OR NAPLE PLAIN NN 55356 r » t I ' PROP ADDR ONNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 38 65-117-23 13 6003 •••36 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED R06ERTA E VAUGHAN ROBERTA E VAUGHAN 366V 6AYS1DE RD ORONO NN 55356 36 •5-117-23 13 0006 •••36 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ALXSHAH S AZAD ALISHAH S AZAD 299 DEDERNOOD DR LONG LARE NN 55356 36 05-117-23 13 0005 •••36 ADDRESS UNASSXGNED ALISHAH S AZAD ALISHAH S AZAD 200 DEDERNOOD DR LONG LAKE NN 55356 PROP ADOR ONNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 36 65-117-23 13 OOll ••220 DEDERNOOD DR ALISHAH S AZAD ALISHAH S AZAD 260 DEDERNOOD OR LONG LARE NN 55356 36 05-117-23 13 OOIZ •3620 DAYSIDE RD R I N ANDERSON ROBERT F t NENDY S ANOERSM 3620 DAYSIDE RD LONG LARE NN 55356 36 05-117-23 13 0013 •3660 DAYSIDE RD T N ZIESNER t N T ZIESNER TODD N i NARIE T ZIESNER 3660 DAYSIDE RD LONG LARE NN 55356 PROP ADOR ONNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAHi TAXPAYER NANi/AOOR 38 05-117-23 13 0016 •3670 DAYSIDE RD LYNN N NALSTEDT LYNN N NALSTEDT 3670 DAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE NN 55356 36 05-117-23 13 0028 ••205 rONKA AVE NICHAEL N SCHNITZ NICHAEL N SCHNITZ 265 TONRA AVE LONG LAKE NN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0015 •3500 DAYSIDE RD K DANGERT • V DANGERT K DANGERT 8 V DANGERT 3500 DAYSIDE RD LONG LARE NN 55356 36 05-117-23 13 0066 •0222 DEDERNOOD DR J D NUELLER I R J NUELLER JEFFREY D I RENEE J NUELLER 222 DEDERNOOD DR LONG LARE NN 55356 36 05-117-23 13 0017 03560 DAYSIDE RD KYLE FANILY LTD PTNRSHP RICHARD t KATHLEEN A KYLE 1160 TQNKANA RD LONG LAKE NN 55356 36 05-117-23 13 OOOO 00265 TONKA AVE NARY KAY NCCARTY NARY NCCARTY 265 TONRA AVE LONG LAKE NN 55356 V ' •] r '■ /:■. hJ^-' t^ P#*": .»»:'■ tV ■UN DATE 01/17/«3 BATCH 512 HENNEPIN CINJNTV PBOPERTV INFORHATION SVSTEN PKOPCRTT OHNCRS LIST REPORT NO. PlASSAOl PACE Sb PROP AOOR OHNER NANE TANPAVfR NANE/AOOR SO RS-m-ES 15 ROSl ••225 TONKA AVE NARIVS NC CARTV NARLVS NC CARTV 225 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE HN 5555* 50 •5-117-25 1* •••• ••27R CRESTVIEN AVE CNARIES N ALORICH IV ET AL CNARLES ■ CARLIE ALDRICH 27V CRESTVIEN AVE LONG LAKE NN 55356 30 •5-117-23 1* ••!• •••5« ADDRESS UNASSICNED CHARLES N ALDRICH IV ET AL CNARLES I CARLIE ALORICH 27V CRESTVIEN AVE LONG LAKE NN 5535* PROP AOOR ONNER NANE TAKPAVER NANE/ADOR 3S *5-117-23 1* 0011 OOOSa ADDRESS UNASSICNED CNARLES ALORICH IV ET AL CHARLES A CARLIE ALORICH 270 CRESTVIEN AVE LONG LAKE NN 5535* 3« *5-117-23 1* ••12 •••SB ADDRESS UNASSICNED STATE OF NINN ONR REAL ESTATE HGNT ATTN DEBBIE CURTIN S«* LAFAVETTC RO ST PAUL HN 55155 SA *5-117-23 1* 0017 OOOSA ADDRESS UNASSICNED CHARLES N ALORICH IV ET AL CHARLES A CARLIE ALDRICH 270 CRESTVIEN AVE LONG LAKE NN 5535* PROP AOOR ONNER NANE TAKPAVER NANE/ADOR 30 *5-117-23 1* OOIA ••20* CRESTVIEN AVE PATTV L CLAPP PATTV L CLAPP 20* CRESTVIEN AVE LONG LAKE HN 5535* 3A •5-117-23 1* OOlO ••255 CRESTVIEN AVE NARK N HILLSTRON HARK N HILLSTRON 235 CRESTVIEN AVE LONG LAKE HN 5535* 3A 05-117-23 1* ••20 ••2*5 CRESTVIEN AVE GARV F COLL II CARV F COLL II 2*5 CRESTVIEN AVE LONG LAKE NN 5535* PROP ADDR ONNER NANE TAKPAVER NANE/ADOR 30 05-117-23 1* OOCl •0255 CRESTVIEN AVE STEPHANIE REINAN STEPHANIE REINAN 255 CRESTVnN AVE LONG LAKE NN 5535* 3A *5-117-23 1* 0022 ••2*5 CRESTVIEN AVE JOHN C NORGAN JOHN C NORGAN 2*5 CRESTVIEN AVE LONG LAKE NN 5535* 38 05-117-23 1* 0023 ••275 CRESTVIEN AVE HAROLD R HANSON ETAL HAROLD R HANSON 275 CRESTVIEN AVE LONG LAKE NN 5535* PROP AOOR ONNER NANE TAKPAVER NANE/ADOR 38 *5-117-23 1* *02* •0285 CRESTVIEN AVE SANDRA J NICCUN SANDRA J NICCUN 285 CRESTVIEN AVE LONG LAKE NN 5535* 38 *5-117-23 1* ••20 ••250 TONKA AVE GERALD L BRIGGS/IRENE BRIGGS CERAID ■ IRENE BRIGGS 25* TONKA AVE LONG LAKE NN 5535* 38 *5-117-23 1* ooro ••23* TONKA AVE 0 HARCUSSEN A H NARCUSSEN DANIEL A NARV NARCUSSEN ***7 OLSON NENORIAL HNV GOLDEN VALLEV NN 55*27 PROP ADDR ONNER NANE TAKPAVER NANE/ADOR 38 *5-117-23 1* ••*« •••38 ADDRESS UNASSICNED STATE OF NINN STATE OF NINN IONR I S3* TONKA AVE LONG LAKE NN 5535* 38 05-117-23 1* *055 ••2** CRESTVIEN AVE JEFFREV S NELBV JEFFREV S NELBV 2*0 CRESTVIEN AVE LONG LAKE NN 5535* 38 05-117-23 1* 00*1 •028* TONKA AVE P A A K S SK006 PHILIP 8 KAREN SKOOG 280 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE TBI 5535* t * f • \ i 1 M r t. % ^ > ( iUN SATi tl/l7/iS BATCH 512 NCHNCrXH COUNTY PBOrCIITV INFOiNATION SVSTCN fftOfCiTY OVNCRS LIST rtOf AMNI ONNCi NANC TAKfAYCII NANC/AOOt TOTAL BATCH 512 tim ffp 'U •* t . i / BEfOiT NO. PXA354B1 PACE 57 t CCRTirv THAT Tm FACTS RCFRESENTEO AtE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REfRESENTATION OF INFOmATlON AS IT ARREARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEHNERIN COUNTY DERARTNENT OF RRORERTV TAXATION, JO THE REST OF HY RNOHLEDCE AND RELIEF. ^ .K • ^ Application Date: 1/28/03 ^ ^ 60 Day Deadline: 3/29/03 oi i v Uh OHONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: DATE: Name Wendy Bottenberg ITEM NO.: ^ Title City Planner AgeiidaSection: Zoning Item Description: 802-2871 Dan and Sally Weatherly 1214 Wildhurst Trail After-The-Fact Variances Zoning District: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) Lot Area: 47,327 s.f. (1.086 acre) List of Exhibits: A Resolution B Staff Report and Exhibits of 2/19/2003 Application Summary: The applicants are requesting two alter-the-fact variances for a newly constructed single family residence. The first variance is to allow the foundation of the newly constructed residence to be located 9 ‘/i’ from the side property line where 10’ is required. The second variance is to allow the eaves to encroach into the side yard setback. Pertinent Code Sections: 1. Section 10.03, Subd. 15(A): Non-Encroachments: Eaves shall not be considered to be encroachments on yard requirements provided they do not extend more than 1 feet. To permit eaves to encroach more than 1 W into the side yard setback. 2. Section 10.24, Subd. 5 (B): To permit the foundation to encroach 6" into the side yard setback. The side yard setback will be 9 feet where 10’ is required. Discussion: The subject property was purchased in 2002. The applicant’s initial plan was to remodel the existing residence and add a second story. Shortly after the applicants started the project, it was determined the foundation was not sound enough to handle the additional load of a second story. The structure was demolished and a new foundation was built. While out to the property for an insulation and roof inspection, the building inspector noticed the eaves on the north side of the residence were more than the allowed \ W. The inspector verified this by review ing the submitted plans of which the building permit was issued. The eaves were too big. The City then notified the builder of the problem. Shortly after this, the applicant’s brought on a new architect and builder. City staff and the new architect and builder discussed the problem with the eaves and a proposed attached garage. Another set of plans were submitted for the proposed attached garage. The proposed garage met the required 10’ setback. The garage was designed to follow the setback line, however, when the property was surveyed for placement of the garage, it was determined the foundation of the new residence encroached into the side y^rd setback. (9.6'* 9.8’). PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 6 to 0 vote to: Approve the after-the-fact variances as built, allowing the residence to be located 9 Vi from the lot line where 10’ is required and to allow the eaves to encroach into the side yard setback. The hardships stated for the variances include history of the project (keeping construction on track to finish), aesthetics, history of the lot line and economics. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: A RESOLUTION GRANTING AFTER THE FACT VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 15 (A) FILE NO. 02-2871 WHEREAS, Daniel Weatherly and Sally Weatherly, husband and wife, (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1214 Wildhurst Trail within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Registered Land Survey No. 1450, Tract A, Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereinafter “the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for after-the-fact variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24. Subdivision 5 (B) and Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (A) to allow ’ encroachment of a new single family residence to be located 6" (O.S') into the side yard setback resulting in a 9.5' setback where 10' is required in the LR-IB zoning district; and to allow said new residence to have eaves of 3' where 1 V{ is allowed; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Miiuiesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 19, 2003, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. Minnesota: FINDINGS 1 . This application was reviewed as Zoning File #02-2871. The property is located in the LR-1B Zoning District, where 1.0 acre is the minimum required lot area. The property consists of appro.ximately 1.086 acres. Page 1 of 6 .Jk 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 19, 2003 and recommended approval by a vote of 6 to 0. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: 5. 6. A.There was a lot line rearrangement in 1976 to correct a substandard setback. Another lot line rearrangement would only create a substandard setback for the adjacent property. B.Cutting back the eaves on the north side of the residence and moving the foundation of the residence 6” is not economically feasible or rea.sonable because the construction is nearly complete. C.Cutting back the eaves on me north side of the residence and not the south would result in the residence losing its s>mmetry. D.The project to construct a new single family residential home on the property is nearly complete after a series of errors which w ere not realized until long after they occurred. The City Council finds that the conditions e.xisting on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary' to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Ihe City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 6 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants after- the-fact variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) and Section 10.03, Subdivision IS (A) to allow encroachment of a new single family residence to be located 6" (0.5*) into the side yard setback resulting in a 9.S’ setback where 10’ is required in the LR-IB zoning district; and to allow said new residence to have eaves of 3' where 1 W is allowed. Approval is subject to the following conditions; 1.The location of the newly constructed residence is approved as shoNMi on the survey attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. 2.Authorities granted by these after-the-fact variances run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or these variances will expire on that date (March 10.2004). 3.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 10th day of March, 2003. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner (s) Page 3 of 6 { STATE OF MnSTNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of March, 2003 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of March, 2003 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this davof ,2003. appeared before me, ____ who is personally known to me ____ whose identity I proved on the basis of .personally whose identity I proved on the oath/afTirmation of credible witness a and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 6 r, % t STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this__day of appeared before me, ,2003,jjersonaliy who is personally known to me whose identity I proved on the basis of whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation of credible witness .,a and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their act and deed. Notary Public Pages of6 i * i 1 ‘ i I] ; f wJ ' Vv- -'' . f* ^. *■ ■ ■• •• -Ife ■\^' ' '' • >■ .''<'= -‘a •,?' .v;' . (u O 0» 00 (9 TO;Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Wendy Bottenberg, City Planner DATE: February 14,2003 SUBJECT:#03-2871 Dan & Sally Weatherly 1214 Wildhurst Trail After-the-Fact Variances -- Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-1B One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) Lot Area: 47,327 s.f. (1.086 acres) Exhibits: A B C D E F G H I J K Application : lardship Statement Survey for remodeling Survey for attached garage Elevations Floor Plans Lot Line Rearrangement -1200 Wildhurst Trail Photo of Property Plat Map Property Owner’s List Letter from Adjacent Neighbor Pertinent Code Sections: 1.Section 10.03, Subd. 15(A): Non-Encroachments: Eaves shall not be considered to be encroachments on yard requirements provided they do not extend more than 1 Vi feet. To permit eaves to encroach more than 1 V^’- into the side yard setback. 2.Section 10.24, Subd. 5 (B): To permit the foundation to encroach 6 ” into the side yard setback. The side yard setback will be 9 '/j feel where 10’ is required. Application Sumniaiy: The applicants are requesting two aher-the-fact variances for a newly constructed single family residence. The first variance is to allow the foundation of the newly constructed residence to be located 9 Vt' from the side property line where 10’ is required. The second variance is to allow the eaves to encroach into the side %ard setback. Discussion: The subject property was purchased in 2002. The applicant ’s initial plan was to remodel the existing residence and add a second story. Shortly after the applicants started the project, it was determined the foundation was not sound enough to handle the additional load of a second stoiy*. The structure was demolished and a new foundation was built. #03-2871 Dan/Sally Weatherly 1214 Wildhurst Trail 2.147003 Page 1 of3 7 r; #1 While out to the pro^y for an insulation and roof inspecUon, the building inspector noticed th, lids by «vierng tS p^oSbS?dta^^if,l^i3s^ ‘T^amT'*^ City staff and the n«'v «ch»ect an^ builder di«ussed the problen, with the eaves and a proposed attached garage. Another set of plans were submitted for the proposed attached gar«e TOe praposed garage met the required 10’ setback. The garage wi dSgned to fX?^ setock for placement of the^ge, it was detent the foundation of the new residence encroached into the side yard setback (9 6 -9 8’) Plans: tai«i» ajS '“-y showed the #r 'flu- *0 »«och«l garage show the eaves larger than on set ?fi, il M* “'1'°'*^ •*'" construction wS^ruT^frbX^^^^^ Foundation: In the LR-IB zoning district, the required side yard setback i« in* The. k..;i,4- Eaves: ‘ '» ‘""oach no more than I ■/,• i, "-.'■i-- HorverXTves foJCoSshow 30" because that plan is “as built". Also bec^ ih. 'r“..T™ »“ « the eaves are 30". they encroach 36" into the side >ard setback. (&e Exhibit C)“ Lot Line Rearrangement: The lot line between •'•4and 1200 Wildhurst Trail is oddly shaped due to a lot line rearrangement. In 1976 the property to the north, 1200 W ildhursrTrail, received approval for a m-2V\ Daa'Sally Weatherly 1214 Wildhurst Trail 2.14/2003 Page 2 of3 It rtiliMfo-liallilliii lot line rearrangement to help correct a non-conforming situation to the existing residence to the south, 1214 Wildhurst Trail. The residence to the south is the subject property applying for the after-the-fact variances. Statement of Hardship: The applicant has included their statement of hardship in Exhibit B. The applicant should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Issues for Consideration: 1. The error in the location of the foundation was discovered after a building permit was issued and the residence was almost completed. Would Plaiming Commission require the residence be moved to conform to the required setback for new construction? 2. The building plans submitted and approved indicate the eaves would not encroach more than the 114* allowed into the side yard setb^k. 3. The eaves are not essential to the structure of the residence. Does Planning Commission find any hardship to allow the eaves to remain as is, or should they be cut back to meet the required setback? 4. The property is conforming to standards of the LR-IB zoning district. 5. The new residence did not require any variances to be constructed. It met hardcover, structural lot coverage and height requirements of the LR-IB zoning district. 6. If Planning Commission recommends to deny the after the fact variance for the oversized eaves, should the location of the foundation be considered in determining the size of the eaves to be allowed? 7. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the after the fact variance for side yard setback for encroachment of the foundation. Reviewing the building plans that were submitted and approved (Set U1), the eaves indicated on the plans do not encroach more than the allowed 1 54’. Therefore, staff recommends the after-the-fact variance for the encroachment of the eaves into the side yard setback be denied and cut back to conform to required standards. *03-2871 Dan/Sally Weatherly 1214 Wildhurst Trail 2/14/2003 Page 3 of 3 J 0I A CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.)^ (SSO.OO per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change firom original application) Variance for non>confonning structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) Application | Date Received Amount Paid Son. PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address—"TrA.il ______ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) oT . in » 2 3 > 3i - ©o xC# Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey _______________(montWyear)I (do) ^o not> also own the* adjacent parcels of land. A A A A A .Present use of proper^. Y j^idential Zoning District:_____I tb other (specify). APPLICANT Name t 1 AddressTgo'fo K/I • Phone (home ) S 2 • <4l7 w vf ^ ___ Phone (work ) S City : fAtnjmA Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Address:City.- Phone (home). Phone (work). Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: |._________' (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED ___ Lot Area V Setback: ___Lot Width Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Cov Average Lake Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: (attach additional sheets if necessary) 6 # R 71 6 Statement of Hardship 1214 Wildhurst Trail, Orono Minnesota We have determined hardship due to the building errors created by Innovative Remodeling. •••• In spring of 2002 the Weatherly ’s purchased 1214 Wildhurst Trail to renovate for their home. The Weatherlys hired Innovative Remodeling to design and build the renovation. They asked Innovative to assess the soundness of the home and were given a letter by a structural engineer stating that the house was sound. A remodeling plan vws developed utilizing the existing basement and first floor of the home and adding a second story. Construction started in May 2002 and not long after. In early June, the Weatherlys were told that upon further investigation, the basement was not sound due to the fact that footings were either non-existent or not to code on the lakeside of the home. They were Informed that a second story should not be added and in fact, the entire structure would have to be tom down. The Weatherlys were unhappy with the situation but proceeded with the totally new structure because they felt they had no choice due to the extent of the demolition thus far. Innovative Remodeling demolished the structure and constructed a new basement. The continuing construction was plagued by similar miscommunication and cost overruns. In the fall of 2002 the Weatherlys asked Innovative to put the project on hold for two v/eeks while they assessed their options. At that time. Innovative Remodeling left the job and did not return. In November, Sharratt Design & Company and Robert Craig Homes were brought into the project to continue the work. At the start of their involvement, Sharratt Design & Co. contacted Orono Building Inspections to discuss the project and the status of the work that had been inspected up^ to that time. SDC was informed by Lyle that Bruce had found the roof overhang to be 6" over the permitted setback and presented a setback problem. SDC further discovered that the roof overhang extends a total of 12" into the permitted setback. As part of the continuing work. SDC designed a new attached garage for the project. SDC met with the Planning Department to design a conforming structure. Plans were given to the building department for a new permit. Because the garage v;as designed to go up to the setback line, the original sun/eyor was employed to locate the new structure for the block contractor. Upon laying out the new garage a problem was discovered: a discrepancy behveen the actual field conditions and the proposed survey. We determined that the surveyor had not been called to the site to locate ^e house when it was rebuilt by Innovative. The contractor had built the foundation into the setback on the north side of the building ranging between 2.5 ” to 6". The current survey included with our application shows the original conforming building location and the current building location. These unfortunate errors by Innovative Remodeling have produced a continued disruption for the neighborhood and a serious hardship for the Weatherlys and the City of Orono. t:-. ••• . ■* • • * * n ii 6^ c. /I /'/ ^ / V n. \ '•'"‘"'Zi* \ \ M.§ , / 3 seASON PORCH \i r \ rr^ ^ ^ / / l/T ^ ^ VP^ sQ-^‘ 250_ , - - 177.3 \ \ \ \ ^ ,^K.v slMir i/»* S7312 03 E —290.00 — /l ^'I S'\ 'o.d l^^'r >\ \ poor® j -36’49”E 25.00 --2^ •49’E 3 SEASON PORCH / / / /-7 Lx / '"'1 TD 5in ^ Ec-v/eo ri'2-' ri^aq ’^'Krj^x-ri^Uj.w. vv-i'-rf STAIRS rMN niMi r.<TMrf4 l«AO^VJOM AT tlA5T 0*.C M VKtVAH CUAtO««\A OriN SIOIS A fx^taTMl_____ o mftxnn jpr^iMovgo vea«i c9:«icaDO A3 ww o t:&r A:*r«vio - csTAicf t Acsx*.^ «f avArtfiif » M W» r ai^ «**• «l» tM 9V» n •«, «•••>• *• IMttrwiaataf ««HaK« tL/iva Jilan ^1 .PO ewi EcV'J^’Ci IVa-’ MIN.WOOD TO EARTH SEPARATION «• Bite r 1,1 . » i ■\J4 , / 6’/1 I '-OL-'/ • ^ 56IZ ■ . ISxv/Ciij ON/<2.tof2<dcL r t’i *• / II /• I:-' ••... *. jl if' •.r;j•• «iU ♦ • i * f flpapJiliJjfiJf, • •. • • t • t * .'; *V* V;v'v,' „: V; ■|^ nrv n (ccr> aei ffy*- PiocesaJ c->''ao.c^ TD5t>C5 tsmam i iiliiliSifipi^^ jllWMBMJIlMaWilkwS I iilf /mmM r-,....r(rj|iill_ || ^**^>0**OSEDrROHrELEVATin>i Mft «r»r*r ^^«eCTIOWATQAmQK . .* • V tt S3 1 1 . 1 f-. __ • •. *• »f • * ••*' •- V I I * J f. f, • f \ • ' • %J. •* • • .•• >. , V • •• «•.. • ? •• • • •.. • * • • * • t •*.. .• • • / • »« •j • •' • * • • •c •• » # • f \ • #■ • Am • •* •• .• • >»• • • s M *\ •• • .* • t * *• > * • I *• i . ^0 •* . . »,•.;.rr V'T* . •• t • •* r .• / : * • • • • • # •• . •..» • . i . *• *. • 1* I • • •. • • • • V.:-v •. :. V .. * •• \ - ■ . * * *’. ». ^ , . • • * • * •• ..« • - * - • I. •■ • • •••r-^ -H . V ■■ ’' • ■ '• • < * .••;•*•;• V- t ' •• / •• • •\ *• V • • -2- . .. • • • •., •' • * . * .•^ • • •• •- 11 ti-, 1 1 _ _ _j il •* *• • *•• #• 1 • i d •• • • • •1 ..••••• • * *••• • » • ♦ * * • • • - * • .• • • . . • • .•• • • • . * • ^ • • *• « * m r *' ‘H • /* • •: • • • ••• • • •• #• *• .• • V •• « • •• • • .• • • • •• t • emiMa LOMER icm. HM f ■ *• •• ■# X • • • •• • • • i . i .• mmm «r»r*r * " 1 •• **. I. • • . • - • -• mMtuuBtm ft •88SSSkftft2SS -ilA3l • • . .* / ••* #v. • • •. ' • •• .•. • •• . i iSiSOt.. . Bp’ p' ' / i ■: % . m: ■> =■■ />Wf->r’' .i ' •.;.«■• f V;i ^ii. -7 7-- ' . *• . • •. • •.. . ! \i » : . ; .• • BilB • • * •> ------------------- ■-■ . ——------------JU-TI rm...L-.a. 1. «M.ua...y,.,.;!i. V> •...* A *• / . • • .• N .• X • *• • • • vdai'v ■»**» .o^pi^v, • I « • • . . ‘ i ; /n • . • / . • :; •■ I . ' •. . *.•# • . • • . -%• • • *» I • • ^ V* . • . • • I ^ • • • • .••>?'0 o- * • * • t • • *. . .• . ^ . r 1 r’ • • •*• • • • ^ ^ ^ ^ • ♦ • . • • • • . • • ^ « • , • • •• r-V •.•; ••;••• .. .;•^^^...•^■: •/ . • ^>v:v,:.--;'-;• ■•,.■ »■•: .•■■ ••:'■: •• •■• ■■■1 • ’‘V• . '*•• . TO: •; ^ * t ’’ ’' ’• • •FIC.l: -V • • • K. R. Bchscn II. F. ^'Jhich . ' February 27, 1976 .‘-.* Sl^’cCT:David J. Knisbdpf - 1200 Wildhurst Trail Variance - Lot Area and Width ■ - a-*: This prcpexty is located in an LR-IB residential zone. Mr. Kmslccpf is ,• •.•'■?• 7, a variance frcn lot area and width requirenents of caa acre,: j ■..-» «•,• ft.) crd 140 ft. lot width. His lot consists of .7 of an acre t. *dde therefore, he is requesting variances of 13,068 sq. ft- •:-i' \ ...'V-\ • •f • ;V • Th« proposed location does nset all sctbach requireiwnts. However, ws do • have a problem in the existing location of the residence on the property V • ‘ ‘ *■— *■---------------------------------------------'—"---------------*--•«*--------------•*■*-'* — -v-,14 :C.,V :■ SS'Si .S cncipcdiing - ■■■ •. •' the pToperti to tiis south. We have here a nen-con forming situation which we ^<wd Tsetify. - At the time that the neighboring residence t«as constructed surveys ot required with building permit applications. This house is new _ _ _diing the property line to such a degree that it does not even meet the DiniBxaa State requirements. We night suggest as an agreement between the property owners, to change the lot lines scnvwhat so we can. resolve We could also consider, slight variances cn the side . . - ;• i •• ' V • • • SCJC3 of the prdbl^. Ke co V V-. • setback to the north. ' 'V Ve«Shciild try' to meet the 20 ft. distances between structures and also V ^ - • prevent future problems from any fences that might be erected aider another property owners windows.V;., >'•« k- i-.i ; 'V?A ■PLAJWINR CmnSSION - MarA 1, 1976 v.;"‘ T * ,• * '•py^ ..'A.yr.'t' f t hV N ». •.* •*>V ‘I * • Although not scheduled as part of the regular meeting, the Cermissien revieved iJie above application. They then directed that I ccntact Mr. Krushopf and state that the Planning Conmlssion would locic favorable to a v-^riance if he by pri\’ate nsgiotations try to realign the lot lino idth hiS neighbor in order to alleviate the cne foot setback prcblcn. CC^-ESS20?I - r.2rc:i 15, 1978 !*• 'l;*^**f*’ • • • v'4 *.* .'l<r ?Cr, Srnjkzipf c:d Iiia roi.'^ibcr, o3ry Walsh, epponxed acd pxecented a et ? cl:r; a rrrlctd that r.tuld siva I-Jr, t;ol&i 10 fest ci tho oids yard 1 I Hn c;;i:a':tiCT. Kc^rrrar, Kr, Krvit!ctpf rtuld hsvt to alto* his huildins plai by £rI;iT!3 a slisJit rctiticn o-f heuso cn the lot. • •• '{• •/ ,** V I ■•.V.' <• .. _ • • 'V • * T'.a Cntbsicn rr:oirnr::>dr:d cjroTtrai of plan end the '/arioacss ccnsistlng c5 fO -it. Cl Itrt •atUlh; .3 olfd csro cn let croo zrA a 6” varianoo cn &e ri-fe cn lot lino. CarCTiL ?II3rET3 - rari*. 22, 1570 • • •• • .4 I 4 T/n CrtT. ►i’ egrrevtd tho variance end lot line toarrar-iciOTt cs praseated •IrVtVrTAicrd plcn. • r.• « n i ’ # • • / i:- /■*• • . ■■•X • •■ v:-*'-.v; •'.• • *'• / ’ -a ‘ • .V . . • • . •• ___ - . '••* .** •«., ••*• . V.' “‘-a *• •.» •••..V F//I/4/- ' FM/!^ ■ S.^a/9 SKPtflBV fjQ. ' ' * ■• tJ *f.- .V • .* .!• V -.* .,•. --'W L. s. NCS^ >/AS • • r-*/ H • •/• •» V# .:'.* ‘ ^ ••*-;•••• • •• v:• •* V ? •4 '.• ••* /'i* •J • V**. r * • •% ■ jT» <w ^-ac. ///» t* * • : rp^ihElV '^ '^AlflotNS ;s A • rl ••1//.. • ;■»3/ I ^ v W -' i ■■' ^ -'v--'V-i •-•■.•■ •%• •^’•■•■• •■ .'• .:■*• •••',■• ■••' :•! ' : v.;V. c‘-•-V^ •.■'.■• 'V.^- .<?> r,0'.• .*.J • i\ \ ••'* •• .'M '*f. . .. ./ . .. «"• ^ ’.^,- **’* •• - ?iV;^ ?i'.‘.4'- .V.. •, fi*** f^i I* “ • # _____________________ * * • . .; ' • •v'!* •. ' • . i f ecesc* MSI • : -mpm^ i waiAMee SCHOELL &ejc%us4£i ftutssss^ PUSDSTs;^ utfcD cv0^vsv:;) y. • r • r' ■>camsaK8 a iMXvavoRS '< VatilMTHAVSNUStOUTM 'M09*tM9. MIMMSBOTA BSSAB ^ • 1 • • • PMONl MB04»A^974 VUO m M7« .MOS7C3 • < I- -’».•••* ••’j.'''.'•* ,‘y- . * "^ •* ^ • * * •*\ •'.* *v ."• » J-V't . ;■-: ••• V. . .' 97510 > ecoeaz/'a 08 eno>fn %» m r/a //// comer i! M o - Psnohs iron rrionumenf. ©a/ 4--II < . ^ypsnohd ircn frcnvmenf found »C^^n7j'02nohe etvsf. epofef»>/. ^cro^a fhor » 95^5 ••• »# •••r y . ! 4 * B • «■ * mk •. #• ?V! • . V-!‘'S • ^' •. ■■■, • >T» - . ■■ .‘T I Cff^gy THAT TH:S 13 A TF.US /!-\0 CX;W"CT R£?«2£SNTA-nC i » A E JA'/EV O? THS EC*J\*0A;^!29 O?; Tract A C^aois^fered Land Survey t/o. W6, Hennepin County, tiinneoota. ' A\3 C? T>3 LCCAT;0N AUL EU:’-0;\‘G3. I? ANY. T--i£F.2CH A^O AJi V.S:21S tr.^W»JCMWaNT8.1? ANY. 8ACVJ CA CN CA» IA-X3. ^ ,t KL SLOMSYaa av k.3. c?» UJccaa >»,7 y 0!t.2Cv e*j?2S ‘/:3o.\'. r<-!;s ■ Jamtarji ------^.is^ «C--3T5A23 U-VO v'-i *'V*'’ WSJBSTOTSS .-n. -Wj-,*^._«»niiiiiB«iii ■■( I .„ .... i.'i.% .*4^-. S •O f .Jfor ''v -A- »>j ^VV '«■ ■» • * * K» «:. .it •* *•' . .• T •. ■ *. > >' •r,. »iV ' ' I'.rf tf* V(4 * • «A AM • i,..- *:•*: ••* • SWJA. • \ * ‘ V S%•<?. . : •. M. *« • • • J . • »<V; r /H t '•.* * •I* •I .! . •■ 1M& S:?.- f: ‘n--■•■; ^X t : • J !• *; • -. .. O V J*!I .••*»'H ■ • :•■ .'' ••«. • ' •. •I * *‘. *lf *i‘ • • . ■ • . i •/•'»», ■.’■** •* I • V* * f» • ’ * k • ' *••»* ;•.••■; fV-V v,*r •• •• •••. •'• ' •/. .'. ‘'.I •>•: vr-; •;. .,.' •• . • • i'•/v: :^v• •. P^oPotCo e tiftKjo c • i*j P^0P//t*7r LfAyf I I _______ _____________________ I FLAME INDL'STR)iESraNC.1 > ■/ • •" V--:- >-V;* J'.' > *:• ;.■'•• . '»• r -4 • ^ ‘-vrt - . .•>? S* I • *. •. . s.vvj I-".:'; .: ■ ■ : * . V • ** •* • >• .• •. •« UiMMiey D*t« ~OitcWlMr Uf ;-11 ..^...... ..f • * PCoP0^.CO PBoeCrrY 4f r ll&OA3mlfl0 liL'j ' . • - • ,*.r 1.* ■ ■ . •; • :.i*. .* /• . 80SbxV2SZb>} .. 3535. 'Ivy .PlacQ * T. ^ -• •• • 1 • • • * 8 V '■. ii*• • , .• .’ILk • ^** *♦■. ' . .V ! Y / /. V.; *“•:V*- .C- V/ ^ y/^ia■^•v^otaoonvotatad tliat .£b^ 161-' ” • '•'•-• •'. '• •':'‘ ■ 'baA:;rac«lv«fl -a Varbcl cus^ta^kt, *:-- • •.>^ ' "*•• :•C9ri -.trtib^haa bbbn outoftc^^r^^^' * • ’ lots *' "«3 •S^T^?ou?d—> for hl:33alff ena ai^«> %ih a j i. _<• 'iA^ • •• ■ vi:; !• • -KA* ■ •■'.■•■y-M • . 4^. • . • ; ■ •• ri'iu- •‘ ••• ' • ♦• into or.2 oita po?t of l«fc /2, PO.TC o5 ZiOt 75, IfOt 75, tho pnirt of lot 77, iot 163 and pS^ oi ^ n.Uoy. • That th® oilM^ «i ni .*• V • • ovi3«s to.a ^SS"S«?aSefl4?“ ** “ > t' -'^ •' •• ‘.V.vi-T- • V ru7i»Ayao (3) • :iayo (0). fr'-f..* ; '• • -• Han^ ti*»hich. Building u Zoning Atr;ini3**-n*’ft» ^2 located in a mllB •* •• fix.' KxuaHopf is ricr-it><*«*•■j '.? ,vc!?iBneo fcea lot. area an^^iath nic 2ci co'isiatQ ii 9 ,,,, i* ro ft.:«ii;,, .S5«ro1o?*hJ*iV«?S,?ff? "« ^■.J/ariaj)cs3 02 ,13,0*8 o?. ft. ana SO f^f “”® . V *. VARIA:7CES 1200 S/ildhurot Trail (Continue ^ Ajr*^ ths'propair^ it dbos.not •vai wr " " ■" ■C33t tha 20 ft. distances 'O / •;. . ' ^ ® ^21S5tU3f3C CUld dSO pXdV3Jl ‘b £U^UX6 A \#% » • V ;^*f: . ----------—— 1 ■.j ^snaw W •. • ^ March 1. 1976 ■ a* partVof thb' regiilii Ccsnimsion ravievid ths above '**^*” •*’*^ directed that! TOntac^^chat . the Placing - .^»®vorably to a. variance •;• *. ^. 7. /*.. •/. t 4 .V f. V iia« ^ order to•,^j • alleviate ^the.,one. fMt aetback problea. v^v Planning Ooa^ 'f2s< •. • •.* 4 i' -] .‘ V^''Plrajnlig;C5o^ - March 15, 1976 r * - * '• * *'* “ neighbor, Gary Welsh, l vprofiMted a oap to show a * * tsvioed line'^at trauld give Hr. Welsh 10 ft >. ^ /7- ;. • -^ •* . • .• '*4 v-c ^ ;/; • > r: . .. •.; • * .* y- '4* 'f* • • •,.*# j • -.1 • n.. •*.** •.- ‘ -t '>>. ;i: *.-v *7 * * ’r *.' • *7 nV • ’x ‘ •* * ; ‘ . *• .■•*.•••• '• ; .-;T •. . X /V * e ;7‘ * : a - ■ • • • • , * '. *.*. * . • • V-* • • • • • • ' ♦* • • . • • • • ! • > • •*••.••'■ .1. '. • '• . * • ? ; *r *. . -.V . ^ .. •.•. • *I • * / • * . ^ • • • e * •» . • • / ’ • • •#4 , ^ • • • *.*! ••• ,• / . * » • ■ 4 ■• • „ • \l • f . ‘ # . • • • •• :j-- V.:. V.• • # \• •■.*••. r r c » .... .•*..*• * * *.••. ‘‘-V.. . ^ ‘ •• • ' .-• . V • i;. . 7 .• •• • .•• ../•*' *'. ;. • .» , • . • •■%■'.■• • • 'v . •. f • * • • • ' •, • • • 1 ' ■ ■•.• •■ '• *•.■ • *. • , • rc'v :•■ .. ‘ .• • ' • • * • • .. • • ! • m ‘ - #» • *.1 • .e e • a - m • • • a . e • e• • • • .'* • •* • e • •a • • • #• *' • / rr>K ‘i*.' ... ■'•: ’ ^ ?.: •• ,:"^T .•^$1 A .* :-‘S .• • •*. A,* \ :«-l •■:on a:a lot. } • » • -1: . •• i* . •• • • i .* •‘•.^} •• ; i J»• • ..i: Cl .1 The Cc.-m.lf33ion rcccirrxinSed aporoval of the w'U ... s.. .~c/2d, Hooooagalo oecenied, to coorova e.a var.'..ar.ca fer lot vidch and area end* lot Kruekopf, 1200 4 • ■' e • i- • • : •-'•■• •> i •'.* .».. 5 l'^ I V A r’A; •o \i. ■■•■■ j--' #v ». '. - > •. •*.•::>t' i* • I. •-•k* • . ¥f\^:k?i:^fl .. •'* sm 'M ::5••?> -^ - vm W ;of r«-.." iVi4iofflirlti*i«#Crytt>lltay.Minni»oUfi6*B«M«icl5olOJIlm '. r .* '■;’f -••• -• •_ -V •• 4^ ' V. - -v ‘ , . • *'0n tht Sorth Short of Lake Minnetonka *.,v -• • *.•• c •* • • % •' •f ••# • • • I . • ••, • « •• •• . .>•. \ c I .*•. * •*• • • •• ■•. -• < i*r. f*^ •* * ■* j . . • ^ y' ’• i|. •*%•• ■.‘i;- . V. Mr. .David J. Kiusltopf 13417 Kashbutn Lane Bumville, Minnesota, SS378 Dear Mr. Knislcopf; Ysur request was introduced to the Plaminx ^!arA 1/1976. . • . * •J; >^- - .*; - ^ :• V , • •*.-#•,# • •>. # ■..• •* • *;■ . V •. t •. ( t M •issiqi at tlair iaotiiis of • • V-- ■-•••.' ..’ . ■ ' r* .; ■ ••.• ! Review of the proposal revealed that the setbadcs of the n^LghhoHiig structure do not ccnply to State standards. This house was constructed -before surveys wore required in Orono. It is therefore a legal ncn-confoming situatica. • ' • * a * * « • »•'9 . * • 'The Plennins Ccnnisslcn does hewever, have the authority of reccenending approval • v' ' .or denial of all variances. All factors are considered before.decisions are ' ' ' ; reediod tnd tite welfare of the public and coeplaince to all standards is of aain .. .-concern. ^•?ria:-* .- • A t'-f-h.y • *. •*. The Planning Cesrniission has therefore instructed n to inform you of the situa- tich-and suggest you contact your neighbor regarding seme changes in the cxistin; - V-*'. .-.l®t li*w ^ rertify the problem. They also indicate tiiat if all existing pro- •.r ;r- • blens'could be -rectified they night look favorably toward a variance which would not result in more problems. ; / .r#. ;:v •*9 . r 1 ••»• 1* ' V r V. 1 ‘ ' * ■rs * * * r.>r ,* » ' •• •. ».r if Sincerely* It. F. lUiich Zoning Administrator % .• lit •I •V %•# • 7 ; ■? ; * • M • • • * * . •# *. S \ ' \ • ’ - ,' • • f 4^* * • • ■ 4 .tV-’ •.V.-.'i- scheduled a Tsublic llonday, April 5, 1976. ' Hill Street (Continued) ' ' . ... Butler inovsdf Pautus sdcondedf to Approve .off tvo^ conditional use permits to 1 • •"• • ewiniraing area on the Stone Md Kilbaina pTOpertiee on Big island, for theV:-ft/.^’***\ . • ^^** .**^ *^*w^u*^*ua wn o^q XSXanG#.t •, Naysata Yacht Club.- ;»!otion. Ayes (4) - COIIDITIONAL USB -’jPEIui Big Island •*. •• I •’.: .Honry I'luhich, Building 6 Soning Administratof# that^the total parcel of Kenneth Oien, 2980.Casco Point Road, consists of 51,000 so. ft. .and is.located in a LR-lc residential ]rt0- ♦» !^V^V’'A on the extea buUdSg silt. 1976 * public hearing to on/April 5, 1976 ;at 8:15 P.M. • . • f ‘ f. j ' ...* ‘ 1 • •4*»V ?«. - ■■ >>'4‘ •;. ’i.«’..•» • ‘ • V.-* ». • ./ .T-. • . 4 ■ .* T ^ . ./ 0K» 5 • XV •V : %■-•* * I ■* •. Y • Henpr Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, *Sf® («.560 »q. ft.) and 140 fi. lot consists of 0.7 of an acre and is 90 ft. wida, therefore, ha is requesting ycrrances of 13,068 sg. ft. and 50 ft. The proposed location does caet all eetback «?''®ver, we do have a problem in the existing location of the residence on W.-.3 property to the south, vie have here a r.on-c on forming situation which we should neighboringro3ia9nc8 v/aa constructad# aurveys were not r.j-jlr.d Kith building pai=it appuS«t<,Sr Th.3 house is new encroaching the property lino to ouch a degree that it does not ^ even neat .tho mlnlnua State requirements. ‘ . SUBDIVISION 2900 Casco Point Roa I^^. iOien is requesting subdividing this orooertv Into two lots, both exceeding the and 100 ft. width at the location will • .*• V • * VARIANCE 1200 1/ildhurst Trail (Continued) ' ’ • Ta. ouggsst aa an agraeatant betwaan the ’ . Vi-r- •• P«o?^3Jfiy ©vnoro, .to change the lot lines •. <:\ooncv;hat so .we.eon resolve oema of the mV.j v ;. problccca. fTe-could aloo consider slight • • ^^3-: ■■• variances on the side setback to the north; ■ >;::jy’V;,^ t*y neet the^O ft. distances ' .bet^rooa'btriicturea ani.aloo prevent future erecbM uador aaother_.property.owners windows. ™ -Planning Conaiiosiori llaeting - March 1, 1976 ’ - Although not sehec.uled as part, of the regular^ costing; (the jCctini'ssion reviewed the'above • -'application'.'^They^ then directed that X . ;Conttct .Hr. :'Kruskopf and state that the Planning CossBission would look favorably to > .h.varionee' if he, by 'private negotiations try :^i‘^"^Mo: xwligri the 'lot line v^th his neighbor ^ setback, . ‘ *pr0Ol#2ls ; ‘ .I.•j %* ^ n VARXAMCE 120.0. midhuret Trail ^ :> .(Continued).:.'; • -y:. *' ••‘.'I • * % ... .1 * ..... • •V . •. ■ • • * to •• 1 •;^ »• V' *• - % < *• f ••...• •V* *c .:*V • •' a ^?.-y ™,- . - .:.. ..* - .;• . - . ' V . . - . Hahri» MuhiCh; Building 6. Zoning Administrator, ‘^y.vStated* that'.the Thomas Giere property, 350 North v^r^xn'Ldhe,'is located in a LR-IA residential :vX • cone with ninimun lot requirements of two acres lot width. ■5=-rj/jj; Tills total parcel consists of 9.6 acres and is v/v^ Vr''352 feat wide at. the road. ^ rp * - ^1'^:?'. Giere is requesting approval to subdivide ■ ‘ parcel into t*.fo lots of approximately 176 •2 -r ft. wide. Both parcels, however, would meet the .•-»' • •• ' ■ if* ^ * * * ' v%i ^ ^ ♦ 4 :* •*\ • .1 ■M ■•Of .to.. * Ti . ‘JVt: r^nievn cxea. Parcel A consists of 5.4 acres with'0.4 acre of v;etlands and the area of Parcel B is 4.1 acres. A public hearing should be scheduled. Plcnnir5.Commission Meeting - March 1, 1976 The ConmJ.ssion scheduled a public hearing for April 5, 1976 at 8:00 P.Il. Henry H’jdiich, Building & Zoning Administrator, stated that Daniel Lindsay/lDS Properties, 2505 Kelly Avanue, is requesting re.oning of v,i.i north 20 ft. strip of land Ivlng in the V. nt-7 south parcel of the old IDS property vrtiich ‘ was recently subdivided into three lots. •The north pro^rty line of the south parcel is > Iccated 20 ft. beyond the south line of our cimrrsntly zoned commercial area, therefore, we >mv;- faced v;ith a situation of a 20 ft. strip ^ n ; ccmnsrci^ly zoned area located in a parcel which will be used and ie'soned residential. ..• • • >• < • • I•. %• SUBDIVISION 350 North Arm Lane f • pi: ZONING 2505 Kel?.y Avenue .»*-i If /fc3 - =3^7/ lU h 'Trri.i ( rJm^m K7:.:. <Wa :?*.'■ 'V,-:. i-:\ IJ^ • T^<P F ^ V C. •;.' V A I •>: c t n 'i-vric t/v. + <•'■'<; ii' ‘j--:''1 '. d»'/tf«i.'>iri-wir.««ti r -fr .5A7/ |bWcl/\UrC)+ I (cx 1 ( . I ^ ; . .. ^ / - t * • a >::a V- >; * 'X . •: X :v f'K ■^" ■ mm -.:m mri l-^: I - r^->- 7‘ •^.r%*;':’"; ■. i■' ■ . . .T . t 'V»v.vk. • Va: . r.,-i, .::>v'.- Tywfe ii»«* s""-''’’ •« ■♦ -i fc.. ^ ! ^-r-.‘W*:. . » . • . I ■• ■ • . • • • •. ■ • • •, *■'•.. I . “ • . " ' V • ’•* '■ •• V* .d■ " '■■'■■■•" TyveW HomeVVri||^ . ... . trUr o rr\ ;V, ^1 *;,W^ :/ •<.' ^ r (C I .J'‘J’ -f Ha ■f'C'Z-J'71 / 6 (^ I l/'i (cl / a c i'zi Tra ‘ . y i L ^ ' iN * V ^ /■.. i t\i a . / > * . ^ ^ »fvt:-* • • *' ^<^1- -/*.* <Cfej.-• ~ '•' ■• • .4 • • "■ <•: '"v'ta !: ■ ■' • • :■•#■■ ^- •■vf s=5-.; :•- . : ; .^ ______, <■•,, \c % s > » ‘ V •i . ‘i t^i ** > ^ ^*V a.T ^ •^ v ' yT.^r - .. *. ^■•^ - .yifi :■■:r ■%'" * -y^r • ' *I"Stv/' ll; JaxsaoCM < >T -.., 7 -• • ilA •r^-. f-"‘«""sVw'-o /.k';* / C CCriicl'. { i I \C I'' I) . J:' /f. : - ■e//v\c'/u*3 /^'*C /U ifV^Cci ■■' -f /C V’ -ir** •' *H^nepin County Taxpayer Seivices;t|ii|H||iffi|^ HEATHERCROFT // " ^3e; -U/ i. TONKAVIn (46) >&or rroF4t MU EW \gardei \is \ \ jr m$Tir« CMUEi ■'•*?#, ADDN , \(37) \,,y ^ ^ L S NO / S ‘ ^oZkn» ,,. S I ^ F/m1 (^^)i/^/ ^' ' ' ' tASTi OAfUstm / '•X ✓* JS\ 553 /*<,• »*»... A **'* lS' //.•:•■ ^SV I.96-, A Lf .A 07- in-'^3,'- * ■4 y*< •.' Parcel Information .1 •*».Parcel ID 0711723310036 House Number 1214 Street Name WILDHUR8T til TNsl$not»kg»tynconkdmtp. Itnpnstt^aeonifiMlonotMomMion -: ana data l»om City, Counfy, anti SWa mad aiahorUaa and cOmaoinaai ‘ ’■ * r % 'j V, ... \j </ mm DATE tl/17/t3 •ATCH S»2' hennenn county property zhtoriution svsteh PROPERTY ONNERS LIST report no. PI%3M«1 PACE 3 PROP ASOR OWNER NAIC TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR M OT'llT-ZS » MR7 •HR* HUONURST TR 1 B RASNUSSEN/S J' RASIMSSSN BRIAN 0 A SANDRA J RASMISSEN 110* NIUNRIRST TR HOUND HN 553*<; 3* IT-llT-BS 2* at** •117B OAROEN CT T A 0 J B SUTTON . TNONAS A SUnON JANE BARBARA SUTTON 2tSSI RNIOHTSBRZOGE RO EXCELSIOR MN BS331 SB 07-117-23 2* 0040 011*0 GARDEN CT JOHN N • CINOV L CULLITON JOHN H B CINOY L CULLITON 1131 HILOHURST TR HOUND HN 553*4 OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADM 30 07-117-23 31 0015 01270 WILOHURST TR J ■ R STASn JANES STASIK 1270 WILOHURST TRAIL HOUND HN 553*4 30 07-117-23 31 002* 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO ROBERT L BIRKELANO ET AL TRS ROBERT 0 HARIT BIRKELAIffi 1200 HILOHURST TR HOUND HN 553*4 30 07-117-23 31 003* 01214 WILOHURST TR S H HEATHERLY/D H WEATHERLY SALLY H WEATHERLY 1214 HILOHURST TR HOUND IR< 553*4 PROP AOOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ABDR 30 07-117-23 31 0037 01200 WILDNURST TR SANDRA J HOLLENHORST ET AL SANDRA J HOLLENHORST I HICHAEL J HOLLENHORST 1200 WILOHURST TR HOUND HN 553*4 30 07-117-23 31 OOSO 012*1 HILOHURST TR SCOTT HICHAEL HENNESSY SCOTT N HENNESSY 12*1 WILOHURST TR HOUND HN 553*4 31 07-117-23 32 0043 0>i*40 TONKAVIEW LA KI NNETH J HICKEY KLNNETH J HICKEY 4i>40 TONKAVIEW LA miUNO HN 553*4 PROP AOOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR TOTAL BATCH . I 502 OOOOO Z CERTIFY THAT THE PACTS REPRESENTED ARC AN ACCURATE ANO TRUE REPRESENTATION OF ZNFORHATZON AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO^HC BEST OF NY KNOHLEDOE AND BELIEF. _ _ DATE #2871 • • i. r- Sandra and Michael Hollenhorst 1200 Wildhurst Trail Orono, MN SS364 952-495-9807 952-495-0067(fax) February 12,2003 Jennifer Chaput, Planning Commission City ofOrc.iO 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 . ' ‘ ' ,vO RE; #03-2871 (1214 Wildhurst Trail) After fact variance request to be heard February 19,2003 Ms. Chaput: We received the notice signed by you advising us of the above referenced agenda item. Neither my wife nor I expect to be able to attend the meeting, but request that the commission consider this letter as part of the hearing on the matter. Our position on this matter is reducible to two points: 1. The city should follow the related guid .'lines and codes it has established, and deal with the matter as it has with similar matters in the past. This construction project has obviously been a difficult project from a planning perspective, so it is not surprising that errors - whether intentional or accidental - were made in the set-back requirements. If the city is to waive the setback requirements here, perhaps the new homeowners could be urged to tear down the old green garage with the solar collectors on top and landscape the resulting space. 2. More significantly, we notified the city inspectors of our concerns related to the setback issue at the very begiiming of the construction project. Your people were on notice that we were concerned, and that the project appeared to be close to, if not actually encroaching. Your own city inspection people were expected to be substantially more pro-active than they obviously were, and we request that they be reminded of their own apparent lack of diligence. Regards; Michael J. Hollenhorst MJH^l: mtak 9 f ■-I E Sandra and Michael Hollenhont 1200 Wildhurst Trail Orono, MN 35364 952-495-9807 952-495-0067(fex) ,2003 xivt referenced agenda item, ng. but request that the le matter. id codes it has established, and ;rs in the past. This :ult project from a planning whether intentional or ments. If the city is to waive t homeowners could be urged to ollectors on top and landscape MAR 1 0 2005 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 7,2003 ITEM NO: ^ Dcpai ..uient Approval: Name RonMoorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Proclamation-Orono High School Boys Hockey Team The Orono High School Boys Hockey Team is playing in the State Hockey Tournament. A proclamation recognizing the team’s achievement at the State Tournament will be provided at the Council meeting. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt a proclamation recognizing the Orono High School Boys Hockey Team’s achievement at the State hockey Tournament. :ors of our concerns related to onstruction project. Your , and that the project appeared ir own city inspection people ive than they obviously were, )wn apparent lack of diligence. 4 mmmim .tw‘^ _________ „ ^ it # A PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING THE ORONO HIGH SCHOOL BOYS HOCKEY TEAM FOR AN OUTSTANDING SEASON CULMINATING IN A THIRD PLACE FINISH IN THE STATE HOCKEY TOURNAMENT WHEREAS, the Orono High School Boys Hockey Team had an outstanding season culminating in a trip to the State Tournament; and WHEREAS, the Team had a successful tournament winning two games and earning a third place trophy; and WHEREAS, the Team's ability to rise to the occasion to win the third place game is a testament to the Team’s resiliency, heart, and dctcmiination; and WHEREAS, the Orono Hockey Team’s special achievement reflects positively on the Gciioui Dibit it. i, ub well ub oil liie cuitimuniucs in the Sciiooi District; anti WHEREAS, it is a privilege and a pleasure to be associated with such a quality group of student athletes. NOW, IHERLFORE, BE IT RESOL\ ED THAT the Orono City Council does hereby oiler its congratulations to the Orono High School Boys Hockey Team for an outstanding season culminating in a third place finish in the State Hockey Tournament, and docs also express its pride in, and appreciation for, the hard work, dedication, and outstanding play of the Team throughout the season, and particularly in the State Hockey Tournament. Adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on March 10. 2003 ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Ma>*or ^ •• • REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MAR 1 0 2003 <;i I T ur ORONO DATE: March 10,2003 ITEM NO.: / 0 Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Public Services Director’s Report Item Description: Request for Purchase of NPDES Stormwater Program Software Introduction Federal legislation in the Clean Water Act requires that all states implement a program to require a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for storm water discharges. The original NPDES program, which started in the 1960's in response to water pollution problems, required NPDES permits for all point source discharges such as industrial sites and waste w'ater treatment plants. After the point source water pollution problems were corrected, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) began to regulate non-point sources of water pollution caused by storm water runoff as storm water runoff is a significant source of water pollution. The responsibility for administration of this NPDES program was transferred to the states for permitting and administration. Phase I of the storm water program required permits for large cities. In Minnesota, the only two cities with a Phase I permit are Minneapolis and St. Paul. The Phase II regulations c.xpanded the permitting requirements to smaller cities. The medium size cities in greater Minnesota and all of the suburban cities in the metropolitan area are now required to have a NPDES Phase II Stomi Water Permit application submitted by May 9, 2003. ASSIST Software Ihis new stormwater permit has e.xtensive record keeping and annual reporting requirements associated with it. As part the League ol Minnesota Cities Guide Plan process for this permit, which Orono participated in. the League and numerous cities evaluated record keeping and reporting software packages to assist in meeting the permit conditions. The ASSIST software was the best choice with a lot of City interest in purchasing this product. If a minimum of 15 cities purcha.se the software, the vendor will provide a customized version of the software to the LMC Guide Plan, one year ot technical support and maintenance, tree training at the LMC offices, and an electronic reporting module for the submission of electronic annual reports to the MPCA. Electronic reporting has been discussed with the MPCA staff, and they are enthusiastic and willing to work with the League and sol'ware developer to develop an electronic reporting function. Staff Recommendation REVISED REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 10,2003 ITEM NO. Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Public Services Director ’s Report Item Description: North Long Lake Hast Sewer Extension At the l ebruary 24* Council meeting a pressure sewer extension project to serve five properties located in the North Long Lake East neighborhood was approved. This project will be financed by connection fees to be paid by the property owners. The estimated connection fee is $ 16.000 per unit. The actual connection fee is dependent on the costs to complete the project. Plans and specifications have been completed, and we have sent a Request for Quotations to three directional boring contractors that have previously completed City projects. The estimated construction cost for this project is le.ss than $50,000. so the solicitation of quotations is an acceptable method to select a contractor to complete this project. The deadline for the receipt of quotations was 11:00 a.m. on Monday, March 10*. A tabulation of the quotations received is showTt below. EJ Mayers Inc., Corcoran, Minnesota Red Pederson Utilities. Hopkins Minnesota MinComm Utility Construction, Mora Mirmesota $40,133 $42,760 $43,265 We are recommending acceptance of the quotation from EJ Mayers Inc. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to accept the quotation in the amount $40,133 from EJ Mayers Inc., Corcoran, Minnesota for completion of the North Long East sewer project. MAR 1 0 2005 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION u i y oh ohono DATE: February 20,2003 ITEM NO: / ^ Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Payment Requests-Long Lake Fire Station The City has received seven invoices for payment for work related to the fire station. Connectivity Solutions for the second one-half payment for the telephone system and voice and data cabling, in the amount of $11,600.26. General Office Products Company for file cabinets in the amount of $702.96. Nott Company for hardware for the compressed air system in the amount of $1052.21. SPS Companies, Inc for miscellaneous hardware for pressure washer system and compressed air system: three invoices in the amounts of $356.93, $48.52, and $3.32. Budget Printing for locker name plates in the amount of $300.24. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the requests for payment as follo\^: Connectivity Solutions in the amount of $11.600.26. General Office Products Company in the amount of $702.96, Nott Company in the amount of $1,052.21, SPS Companies in the total amount of $408.77, and Budget Printing in the amount of $300.24, to be funded from the Joint Fire Account. 'r ir 1 iiri I rnn >i, vk.. « i OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPANY Minneapolis, MN 554l'6-4098 Phone (952)925-7500 Fax’952)925-"531 Equal Cpportunicy Employer WWW.gopco.COrn Invoice Page; Invoice Number Invoice Date Customer Order Number Sales Order No.Ship Date • Account ■ . - . '/ Representative • y • i-Cn • .0^/19/03 •l€4S32 02/19/23 •__________RON PE.-3U2 SOLD TO: H:c:-:i:,L2 s mo?.ss long la;<2 city c? 1964 PARK AVE P O BOX 606 LONG LAKE..MN S53S6 United States P:9S2.473.6961 SHIP TO: m:c -:zll3 s .morse lc :;g la:<3 oity of 1964 PA.RK AVS P 0 SOX 506 LONG LAKE,.‘Cl 553 56 United States ?; 9 = :.476.9622 Terms: net 15 from itr/ date 138785 INVOICE Connectivity Soiutions r'.'^vT ■* * i*^ Ccmr.urxu^on s.s'ATs 6250 Sycamore Lane >icr:h • Suite 5CCA Maple Gf0-.e. VIM 55363 Phone: 762-124-73C0 • Fax: 7o2-i2^.;aC3 :.T'/-c:cE >;v:-!BZ?.: :>r-/OICZ DATE: 000"€£=-:m 01/2T/C3 CITY Or LONG LAKE 1964 PAPK A*/E LONG LAKE MN 55355 5.-AE3PEASCM: ^ * MiJ W * * •* » -W Xw MM • CU5TCME?. NO: JOB NUMBER; CUSTOMER F.C.: SHI? VIA: TERMS: KEM OWEN 4 M I CITYLTM 1020085 UPON RECEIPT CONTACT: MINNESOTA SALES CD DESCRIPTION QURMTITY PRICE AiMCUT'IT LONG LAKE FIRE STATION 340 WILLOW DRI^/E, LONG LAKE, hUl INSTALLATION OF INTER-TEL AXXESS SYSTEM WITH VOICE MAIL, VOICE & EATA CABLING AMD PAGIMG ORIGINAL CONTRACT CHA_NGE ORDER # 1 LESS PREVIOUSLY BILLED 1.000 1.000 1.000 22,639.020 280.750 11,319.51C 22,659.02 290.75 11,319.51 JAH 3 0 2C(S OtyofLong Lake I . • •» - ^ m ^ mmm • - - % «««• ^ m • OB ^ Mil ___Rowtd Likft Kotd W«tt Aftfi#i H^H. MN ISI12«mi 1691» 415*3^00 www.iidneo.oom INVOICE UiCV.* ^ egw.- 9996908 tMTT« biMiMo. " Ji ‘~WW^Qi999-oo s VA. • .MOI#* vfUaL MfKE '1 NORMn^OSP OCMTTO.Non Com^ofiy PO. fox 1490 N.W.-7779 MiontipoOt. MN 9S489-777S 0<^T»NORDCm.AU MlN: IC TSSORH • ♦N- »Sum“liTKEO^rmSu?* « M I ftMNPONT' 1 O'JjkV^1 SMO •• » ■ ’. ‘t*••! 1 2 3 fcW!tE.NSr?'«W« • • • •OBW ,M J » V ■ •‘K-rJv-:.: \8 A 12 \ 12 0 0 0 8-;v:EA'-.^j- :-,• ./ / .• \ • . A • • ......... •' LiiWTdiil,............ . .• • !•». •• • I ••••i • '^•. .•... .•. ■ V.v. ti Qty Sh-ipped Total ' t -tt *4^f« • * 12 .va-. • ” ■' V /; 32 •• '^'v>;.; 85.33100 I 17.33900 : 7.70900;’ * • \ • ^ Oat Total •# •• J aSr/affll!£3X ... .. •y- :*.. •:• V*. .:^ . j^y';*.v. » S»» • '. f- * . • * • y-M. :• • • ' ■ •. •*. .....I'l l.iM i- : • • « ESCSTVEJb FEB I ^ 20113 • ' ^ "• • •• '.v\* V.. •• •;.a.*; ' ! i u • . • %• p« •a ^ - jr. ♦ • • * •/•- Last Page • fa Cash OiscdfRt O.QO If'PMtt O^^ 02714/03 &aei «mM not a* bMm *or >mnh»ntH» rmt/tnua wmimuc m pm AH WpiliWf mMMiHI It tuaits« IP klMManf cAM^. TTt nfi irtfli ft iiitian ta ta oMwt aowaop—iPwfA »p«mpp tia» eoo‘4 cm#3MV1 SKOl iO Alio ZZ96 9Lt Z96 CCSfO C00Z.lZ*83i •» ’0» SPS CON?M «-^c^ yS-:^ Af^ c^u.r2Ui cj^JL r> • x*-* /7'V iniv» ^INESOTA 55416 (952) 929-1377 INVOICE riUMBFR 4135192 date 02/13/03 ii Tl - /^^4t^7o 5-S-//7 NOATHEItN AZR COlU> ^ RSNM CTY MEDICAL CEITTEA 901 S 6TH ST M?LS MK 55401 1^*' '"''‘I jr’LLbA^ fMP M,r>.t^| I r.r.,HfCT.orr. ®WiiB|BBi 850 S24 u«/ W/UJ MG 008015 CM 90E005 \ \ GM HB005003 NC 003C MX 007C FS HBT007003 OM 45ES007 1/2X1-1/2 MIPPLB STD OAL STEEL TXT 1/2" 50 ELBOW OALV MALL THRD 150# a/3"X3/8» HEX BDSH OALV STEEL ITQID ISO# 3/8XCLOSK nipple STD GAL STEEL TXT 3/4XCLOSE NIPPLE XH BLK STEEL TXT HEX BOSHZNO THD FS 3/4 X 3/8 3/4- 45 STREET ELL OALV MALL THRO ISO# A SF.RVICS C2AR6S of 1.5)% p«r maneh will b« *«Si 16 16 16 16 16 16 8 16 tu 0.41 0.6J 0.4Z 0.48 0.83 0.83 2.51 *f> tm m. FES } 7 ZD J3 00-; lOTH ?ROX NET 31TH ^e.1 Lacationt; oa ^brtcaiora 43-488-ai90 SPS Bltmarcx 701-223-a607 SPS Mankato S07.3t7.5S91 SPS St. croud 320-2S2.3030 UPS St ^ul 051.845*9363 iMVOiCE 0.00 5.20 3.S8 3.8 6.6 6.52 20.oe : Z00*4 Clllf IXV! SKOl iO Alls 2296 911 2S6 CC:60 €002.12*821 .......... SRSciat4«v. It ora OUMKANItS, iNc; 6363 HIGHWAY 7 MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55416 (952) 929>1377 SSS CCMPMIZSS JUMIT TO t S« COMPAPISS. INC. CM9005 ST. PAUL. M9 55170-9055 03/17/03 J WORTIfSM X2H COltP ^ 7S 0KAS.10 6 »tVO 87 PAUL KN 85117-1042 HORnaDDf AXP COB9 ^ HENM CTY MEDXCAI. CXNTSR 901 5 8TH 87 MPtS >at SS4Q1 *aneh kAMttont: Hpr MbnCMon 763.4Mei00 SP6 BUm«rek 701.22a>8607 SPS Monleto S07-287-6ii8l SPSSt CtoiiO 320.252-1O30 SPSStfM IB1*«48>93f3 »ACIC1 lOO'd eilTi aXVT SNOl iO 1X13 2296 9Li 296 »£S60 C002.T2‘e3i : oro i^wivirMiMic^^ iNU 63«3 HIGHWAY 7 MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55416 (952) 929-1377 COMFAMXXS BEMXX TO. SPS COMPAMttS. IMC. CMOOS 5T. 9ADIi. »Cf SS17a-«aa5 ^ P3/14/03 * j 7S OWA5SO S BLVD 6T PAUL MU SS117>X042 MOATMSaS Am COXP ?Sr WOW CTY Miprcjir: crsrrsR 901 6 CTM ST MPLS Ki SS40X J.r I jHim p f- •■—f >n»p ' lA Tt ;/A«K r >p -DC NAvr 02/U/03 BB OOifllS \1/3X2-1/2 MZPPLC 9TP WJH STEEL TXT ^08WI* Fix Um 7671 EEj£i/.a. • 3*^T- 57-^fcf L s.— —------------------ 41 > 'r.-,.. I Q.3S i.x: A SEXVXC2 CHAACX of poar moait^ will bft ockiett oo p mc du f sc iCBIVSl) :a 14 2i»: :am$. .0C% lOTtt PEOX MET 31T«wa•oo.o<O..20 3.12 1#•u7ca.4«a-iioo diiifiifeil 70l-123*a607 SFS Manioio 907.387*3691 SPS St Cloud 320*262-3030 SPS St 651-646*3383 iNWDtCS 9oo‘d e»ii#2XVi CNCn iO Alio 2296 91> ZS6 ie*6C COOZ.IZ'Sii fi I s sL'D5£7 PhimiMG ^'■'=9 U. Ui . z 5 1 ? 3l Vi.. F .0. Be;, l-cng Lf.v;a. 55 j?.; { 24' =========a=======a=s-=----___.__j._-_-__ I N •/ BICE Mu; 2J"2i U; ”ustc; A^fcn: StsvE Leng LSf-.a Vzluntcsr Firs Daet. •F.O. Boy oOb Lcr.q Laka r'.ri 5525b ’ • t *.• % ** . ■* Vr • • t cuc^.^.o 252 eRCtPED Bob Coeper ■ PHOtJE ■ f : ** ’ 3H1P VIA Pickup VQt.'F: OFDEP: NCJ F PEPAPED'BY SALES F'EP’ ’ bl2-7«1-459= Cindv '-LWJTIT'I DESCF.IPnar: 5I7£ 0R1G3. ••. •' AMOUNT' '”””'””’“============***==V====================««=»-==«.======k==»=~=*V..,=,»===JS3u Lacker Nana Plates • .• ' •• . ‘ . '■ • i- . . - -21 a-''' ' " ............. -.v -.; -: ;___ • .• -r ' i -:>••• . . ■ * • * * . • • ..• • • • '* *' *• ’• -e' • * " t . . ’• ■ .. .■ • • . ^ ' J ' '■* • *, , • . .*,• •* *..,• 4- ■•, * , ^ ■.•t ; •. . “* “r • ' . • * • ‘\ . •'■ ■' '■• ••■:■'; ' V*"*" •■‘V* •»• -"yy.- y ' v...y y-^,..y\:yyyy^Ay:‘-z-y\r •• A •' Ayy '•■.■ :v.'.■;'* •■■■’ •-' ■' <--r :v'> •: •*• • * ’ :.k► • 4 s • ■ .. .k- •./ ■; - :*.• .^ >'*"• • - ■ * •;• ■> AV' '.■•.;•• • . - 0^. •' •• ' / ;•. ■': P-yy- A y .yi \. • • • . ' • ‘ • •* *.* •* . • • • > “.' *. • . •.. • . • , ^ V •• r- >. •,”-<A .'.•Subtotal •• *. . * %Shxpo;n^ Sales Tax I. 19.32' • * ’ ’ • '■* TOTAL Pavmant 200.24 Balance 3-X .24 • • • • » • • ss:s;s X SMi «m at-r z; s Bss s^s.s; 3 3 ss 2o35 >. ra;« t952>--.-*7i-SS r-iANk YDL'. WE APPCEC: ATE. YOUR BUS DRESS' Terais . rsst j' • ur /s . *s—saass:=r:»arsrx«3*aa .• Net 20 0«/». A Fi.i?r.c5 Char?© Qt The Greater Zr 1.57 ’Dr'; Will Be Charqei On Accaunts Not Pjiad Within 3<j Davs. •'• . ■ * '•/ ’ f V .1 !- .. .* .• • %• ** ’ ♦ ’ t ' ' ■ . ■a.,..•%* 1 y f* < •• MAR 1 0 200J REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Cl I y U^ OHONO DATE: March 6,2003 ITEM NO:/3 Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Application and Certificate for Payment No. 10-Long Lake Fire Station Rochon Corporation, the General Contractor, has submitted Application and Certificate for Payment No.lO in the amount of $55,524.28. This application has been certified for payment by both the Architect and Project Manager, and a lien waiver related to the amount of this paymc;' has been provided. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Application and Certificate for Payment No. 10 from Rochon Coiporation in the amount of $' 5,524.28, to be funded from the Joint Fire Account. % '4 i f BKV o R o u r Aiehii«aui« ImMforOMiffi BOflAMlng 222 Ne«ih 2a4 Smm 55401 PiMM 5I2-23M7S2 fwil2.339.«3I2 Data: February 14,2003 Accantlen: Miehdie Morse Address: City of Lonf Lake 1964 Park Avenue P.O. Box 606 Loi^ Lake. MN 55356 Re: Lon{ Lake Fire Sacon FrejeetNo.: 1515.01 "^1 • -,\1 fii 'i ‘ ica ij f 4 ------It- M.«WNB1NC YOU: U Shop df**4rv UWna QPI^u Qs^nple. □WSSS' O Chai\ge order Ocher TRANSMITTED VIA: Q Mail D Masien|er Q Fax O Other .OPic:.nn r L nr.^f.Tap nrm Appllcrton tnd CerdBcif for 9wmmt Na 10 T THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as cfieckod belMv:.;. B Per approval For your use I] As requested I] For review and comment □ FOR BIDS DUE______ !I] Approved as submkt^ jn Approved as noted J Returned for corrections □ other________ r~l Resubmit ^ Submit Return _copies for approfval copies for dbtributien corrected prints □ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS: 9 m En^ed m two copies of Application and Certificate for Payment Na 10 for work performed on the Long Lake Fke Saden iTojeet. Thaapplianien has been cenMad in the amount of $55^24,28. Pieaie process for payment to Reehon Corporaden. Thaa'.' you. Nan Gustafson COPY TO: Bill Wolcers.Cons0uetlve Ideas. 901 Jefferson Avenue, Suita 30a St PbuLMN 55102 BUI Hayt Rochon CorpontlO(k3650 Ann^olk Lane North. Plymoudi. MN 55447 ROUncOPYTO: CABICI5I5.0I Q.iPROplSlS<0i\iUSveMr-llS-eM«M*«f.|al04ec ITMC!auirtiMnaiMaMi5.kMlyiiaeiyu(«M«a.AMii:2/l«02 900'd eiTT#UVT ONOl iO AXIO ZZH iif tesfo eoOZ.TX’StI r ^ Febniaty 1,2003 Waiver of construction lien , payment BOND AND LIEN FUNDS For good and valuable coosideradon, the undersigned hereby irrevocably unconditionally waives and ralaatas any and all (a) tights and claims for a construction or other lien on land and buildings being constructed, altered, erected or repaired and to the tqspurtenances thereunto, (b) rigbs and claims on any payment bond(t) ftimidied in conjunaton with said constructioa, alteration, ereciioo or repair, and (c) rights and claims for lian on mooey, bonds, or warrants due or to baconte due to the prime contractor tharefor. TTta property covered by this waiver is owned by City of Lana Lake (owner), is located at 340 Willow Drive MM ij described as Long Lake Fire Station and this waiver pertains to a pordoo of the work to be performed by Rochon Compmlgg (prime conoaetor). This waiver covets all labor, material and supplies for constructioa, alteration, erection, and trails Amiiahed by the undersigned under a connact widt CuyofXjaigJl^ through the date of this waiver in the emourn of FIFTy FIVE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY FOUR A 28/1 QQ DOLLARS (S55,554Jg). This lien waiver is Dot valid until the amount listed above has been received. cr.-r'JHGHAnoT 1 ; .' ....t ; - wr!5-j50T* ; j e:- -xa si,aooB •! *1* r — Wvu^eVp ComnaavName Rochon Comeradon Its Vice Btf Company Name Rc * 0 Ccnnctdr Wiiver Fona / i.00’4 Ctllt aim oNoi io Alio ZZ96 9Lt ZU ICtdO COOZ.tZ’Sli r ^ APPUCATIOHi AND CWn^CATt FOU tSMMTmjTt AIA OOeUMfMT 6702) TOlOMMItt; UWt UftA. IM tUii MitNf 0«S»Mlt ^*OJWT| U«9 U«» K m ttt«M iMf UH. MN IftSSI MOMicomAATOKh Omum 3MO KM#ir. t«M 101 KtHyiH, MM %Hif VU tAJICMTICDi OtVOM^M U) MmO JW flMM MiMltlMA MN H4Q1 CCimUCTHHb Omim#C< CONTM^WS A^mCATlQN F^AYMIurf AMuCATION NOi 10 riMOO TOt 9T.J«»>09 AOCMriCT'O MMCfoOi iSilOl eevnucTOATif CHANM ONOCN tUMMART CMOi 0»ttAM aiaiMMA AOOftlQfit 0I0UCT1QI« a«AAiM MMHoa ii 0mm T07M I0T.WM Aaaitvai aaa Maan fMoa# OMaaoMwo I W2W2903 iA2axi2 ▼oraii iBjao.19 AOO i1X1fItl.lOAal lUttM Ap$Aanion ii maOo fa# aa^rntm, at tnoiim OaiOw< lo camctton wlifi ifit ComncL eaminuotiao STtaac Miliiuia AiA eocwnaai 6702 K aiuctod. Hf P9>maM iku aMN wait Mi ai AM MM «M WMt bi HMMaaaiivna ivMikit# Imm 6mm*. m inat chmm i eOKTOacroiu ctixuai xO »,. •r _/ Mia 1. toes 5.(?r> c-ry.*:;: l surghardt " • •■"t'.ic-r.OfiKOTA : 1. ommol eoamucT luM.. X nh QhMaa a# caAA§A a X COMTNACTfUaaTOeATf • ^ totm coMPiim i mmo to oati ..,___ • CfliiMMOMiaTOJi f. atTAaUOi; t.^6 «l CcMflMM MM fCtlkAW0«lMi070l) a._« ii >Mni iMtMf Tiol AttMia* fUM ti» 10 •# Tit|i M CiOiVM I ii Qlplif »««>#««>♦—»>««•».nw a A TOTMlAflMOiiftMnrAMAOi....^^..............a lUM 4 • T«mq 7. iftoaoewtouseemeATtiaoii KOYMiNT IUM« ClMAaMil.------a A cuomiTfaAVMiKTcm —..... a A iouNOiTOKMSKauioatfrAiiuaA ..........a tUfm^rnmUmti i.aaotTo.oc t27.20t.a 2.20AI7A4§ AilO.«Ai.f2 lOf.mii a.04a.00Ait t.aaj.Aii^ ujiMta IfAiTAif —‘'V/? * ; .ta.vjLri.£3C0 • aACwrri ori eairwieATa act aonifli? A aa aM ai iia mm «o CoM»aai OaM>amA MAaOiM CiMaooataiai —oiia iaiaia. waAMiaaniMiiliM --------------------------* — *"rr-^‘T ~i nji na~ raiAii ri MM oaa iMtMIM M mMomo. M omMt Of M wait A M •MiM MiOuMT eutiam •iBtaon OMManta Cnmiftm AiOaaiOaa ara la Mara «a «ot 1m aav ai atoruMv. NaniVKAia liveaM f Aavaarli. 1000 iW r aaaOyair cflRiKtt laitiMi MtaniMi I _ £2^tZS MOMM MoaM iiiiM IMJ c>ioK /K/*> cdic^yOaiM TO# AaaOuair ClimKiO MiAV IMMa Ii* M Omom a* CMMraaw aoo'4 eixti axvi dH07 JO ms mi III ill letio cdds.t2*tij r ^ f A6C 2 Of 2 continuation sheet Swtttttui* AU 0702 lONQ lake fWi fTATlON Am!fiAT10M MUMICIt At9ueiTIM OATl! HMAMO m* JOm C0ir7IUCT0ll*| HMCT MO: 10 1#M1 eica eooi OiOOO oma 0}2CC oteoo 02l« Ot«il :i«ac 03000 09410 042CO 034IA 0C4n.aoMTft aoMo (AaTfOMOoa amuTiuota 3 AfOHA^T A a VOIO 8<n CONCOtTMOi^A uiiOaCAa#A coMOvri ^oiCAST eoMcrm MAIOAilV MONMCCAiT oiioo arm faaiocATio«« oaaoo OitCO easoo|cAjiatiiTiirMAru ••UWOM ACjaviO K»ATti»<ooama KAWMCOiO catoo 07030 07100 07000 cai €0300 OtMO 00700 CO«M COM oa«io oaaoo ctlio oaaoo ONIO 00033 107IC lOtiO 10000 loaooli 0100 >0120 10a 40< iiaoo t24»0 110'^ tjieo 11170 15700 Vtx >70C •000 Micfionao •CVI40UJ* «AUI< arm laccriOM CAOHMTIIV Aceuaoooaa aoevMMAooooa WOOOwon OOvM OLAtMAlM oairiMAUi«(#a caaoo ccMMtCiCUAMy nu ACOUinCAv CflUMO Tt CMOCTAmiTl. roj ti«Oiv Piooo caaoo OAoiTiMyvom TiAO POLOS TOUT OAOTiTiOllO Tooar ACCftaoMa jOCMM iCsNtm Aoa fimwauiiHiat 101CO chaui /tac « fOftW rinTiOYMiQ aovtcu Of 8ca»mAc oouia mt^cowou M ^iOOOMAfi VtMCLO C wOTA mi ^AC»03NaCllff*l *^aC rm oAOTUTtOii L.fCTMCA4 OwirorAi ia.aaa.ao tf.107 00 laa.aaao# 117.377.00 aa.oaa.7i lAitaao co.aai.Qo aA407 II 177.007.00 iia.aii.oo aj77.00 ro.aaan 77,aa«.oo aa.aaa.u a.«2247 10.170.40 130A77 70 aao.00 i.iaAoo 37.007.00 270.07 •OOOOlOO lAOtAO at,740 07 u.aaoM aa. aaaoo 14.070.00 8.040.00 02787.00 ti.72t.00 aa.104 00 l. 177 10 2.700 00 7.ata 00 ti.tia.oo 1.01200 40030 1.11100 a.Maao 1 02120 2.001.00 2.710 00 2 001 04 101 01 1701710 00 •2) 327 20 TO iTO.eO 1 at 700 70 2.iC4.a30 04 51.U1 M 4MUU7AM Tojia.io iiaot.oo 117.004 71 na.4i2.ea oa.aio.3j n.ooaoo 14470 00 04.40040 177.00740 110.78040 107740 7^017.00 27.004.00 34.lif.00 ojuaa 10400 00 120 077.70 07040 0.000.00 24414.00 710.07 401000. ao 3 00100 aa. 740.07 14.280 00 01.200. ao 12.7M.00 1770.00 20.102 00 M.OQaQO 71.100.00 1437 1C 2.710.00 S.77440 1147% OO 14M.00 400 00 l. 11100 3500.00 1.110.70 2.00100 2 3ia.ee lOMOO ’ivoa •23.72040 100.140 70 70.110 00 • 01tM.4i 1401.210 12 07 :|0 12 1MI APiUCAT^M 1.71 J 13 000 4404 72 030 00 000 OOO 7.10000 1.00/ 10 000 Udiooi 000 37170 aoo 1.780.01 IMH iai3O40 000 040 10(100 ttOOO ACO 000 OOO 000 oeo 400 00 114 00 ri2t.C€i 2.04%CO 1177 00: 1J24 00 000 ooe •••00 100 aoo 100 ooe 000 OOO AOO 000 AAO VOO Tonoo 11.117 (4 .100 2.721 tl 1’ 170 1$ / wO rot 44. froiia MATIMk 0.00 0.00 040 AOO AOO ACO 0.C8 AOO ooe 040 ^.JO 000 0.00 Ado 0.00 AOO AOO AOO ooe AOO ooe coo 000 000 AOO AOO aao AOO AOO AOO 040 AOO AOO AOO OOO 040 ooe AOO 0.00 040 ACC oca 0.C0 AOO A«lO 040 AOO AX AOO OOO TOTM TO 0411 00.IIA30 10007.00 10740104 117.23340 OiaiO 33 114atOO n.73AW as.407.ia 173402M 111011.00 0477.00 74JIA7S 274I4C0 M40ASa 1.42247 tO.IMAO 1X477.70 030.M 7.10040 20402 00 21417 40.000 00 7.008.x 23.740.0) 14I60X 8108AX 14 070X A040X ID07.X 1172AM 17 204.x 143710 1.700 X 2401X 21.071X 1 XIX 401X 1.111X a.fiiM 102AX 3.301X 171IX 1118 01 101 01 1M.7XX il)32).X Toeisio «8l .)X JO 2 012 198 41 if 200 If 2.iia.«4i 17 1X IX leo IX |4 1M IX IX IX ix IX IX IX 1X 1X IX IX IX IX IX IX IX IX IX IX IX IX IX IX IX 1X IX IX IX IX IX IX IX IX IX X ix| IX ICC IX X 0.x AX AX ox 20.181 57 A«M.X a.22343 OX ox AX AX AX AX AX OX AX OX OX AX OX AX 0.x OK OX 0.00 0.00 0.x AX AX AX AX AX AX AX OX AX ex AX AX ox AX OX e.x ox ox AX ox 0.x M /ll 17 1 70017 ff.TMM in4«oai 4.7U.41 7X30 f4MU l.Mt 00 2.040.11 104.00 1400X 4.074.M 0X7.1S 107AX 2XM 7.744.M 1X7.70 I.79A33 4)1 12 1.400 17 AOX.X XX 30A20 1XA10 lAU IXAX 111.20 1.407.x 71%X 17tAX 7X.il XA40 1.121 II 1.40A40 14XX )0X 11 AX 142.10 14X.70 AX 22.x 48X 112.71 ai 21 104.10 110.71 Iff 79 O.X 3 003.2I I OM X M20X • 100 C2 JO C71 07 4104 32 •01 4M.I0 m JO f 600*4 cm#ixvi OKOl iO AXIO ZZ96 9Lf Z96 tCiOO CCOZ.lZ’ilJ MOO f»lLlA>W UKiVk: NORTH LONG LAKE, MN 55356 .. Phone: 952-473-470lFax: FAX 952-473-3396 ^ * • • • * * • • • INVOICE 10325 I .* % .* .* ox IX UJ! Lwi>iV9 P.o. BOX 606 LONG LAKE, MM 55356 , INVOICE N umber » • .* •*.•••. • / I . ‘ . . . ' ■ • • • • f - ' • .. ♦ * % • . . . • . • .. . • ■ •• Vv'', •• • ........ • 02/11/2003 --------*N / **■. • TMSmCL TD REC Sr--47?-6961 -p^i . ......... v.i-V V I. ^ y.'.• • 4 yeS4 PKiwr;^ LONG LAKE FIRE STATION .1 /•ly. STRIPS •■• ^ ’•■■• •.•'.••••. .■•••. ;• .: '• ■■■■■ '■ yV-f INS taux : (if Ri:!UEl>TACLES FOR PLUg-Iy ' 5TR rPS~g]iug ~'{e) --------' —inaxiijLiJU {j) PLUG STRIPS. AS PER BID 525.00 Page MANOR Er.EgTnTr- T]|.^r; 455 WILLvOW DRIVE NORTH LONS LAKE, MN 55356 tt- BAHSi *ERM8l: 0 W MVTNIB OF LONi 19 Inv # i CurOMC!*; ; Curr.N«2/l 1/2003 et^r : i03 I 0^: MYTMt ^ AMOUNT^ 6fl6j0#— S2S.00 • • V.. / v; >L£ABE 3ETACH "HtS i»CRTICN 1 RETURN WITH YOUR REMITTANCI. 010*4 CIIIO IMVl daoi 40 MIS IZii 91» Zii SC^OO COOS.TZ'UJ * •mm. ^AR ^ 0 200J REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^ Oi DATE; March 3,2003 ITEM NO;/V Department Approval; Name LinVee Title City Clerk Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section; City Adminisuator ’s Report Item Description; Amend City Recorder l4e Adjustment At their January 13, 2003 meeting, Council approved a fee schedule adjustment for the City Recorders. The increase was based on the fee schedule approved in January of2002. However, an additional fee schedule adjustment was approved in June of 2002, which refiected an increase for longer meetings. Therefore, staff is requesting that the 2003 City Recorder fee adjustment be amended to reflect an increase based on the June 2002 fee schedule rather than the January 2002 fee schedule. Length of Meeting 1 *2 hour meeting 2- 3 hour meeting 3- 4 hour meeting 4- 5 hour meeting 5- 6 hour meeting 6- 7 hour meeting June 2002 Fee Schedule SI 35.00 SI 60.00 SI 95.00 5250.00 5325.00 5420.00 Proposed 2003 Fee Schedule $140.00 SI 65.00 5200.00 5260.00 5335.00 5430.00 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the following fee schedule for 2003 for the City Recorder, effective January 1, 2003: Length of Meeting 1 -2 hour meeting 2- 3 hour meeting 3- 4 hour meeting 4- 5 hour meeting 5- 6 hour meeting 6- 7 hour meeting 2003 Fee Schedule $140.00 5165.00 5200.00 $260.00 5335.00 $430.00 1 r ^ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^ 0 2005 Cl I Date: 3/10/03 C>f}Q^y Item No: IS Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name: Title: Stephany Good Chief of Police )od^^ ice’^y-- Item Description: Ridgedale Court Closing Proposal Exhibits: Letter and Resolution DISCUSSION On February 25,2003, Chief Stephany Good was notified that the Hennepin County District Court was considering closing the Ridgedale Court. She delivered a letter opposing this closing citing its potential negative impact on the Orono police budget, negative impact on fair access, and negative impact on public safety in our area to District Court Chief Judge Kevin Burke. On February 27, 2003, Hennepin County District Court Administrator Mark Thompson announced that the District Court was considering closing one or more suburban courthouses in response to funding decreases. Minnetonka City Attorney Desyl Peterson examined the impact of suburban court closings on suburban Hennepin County police and prosecutors and recommends that suburban city councils consider passing their concerns along in the form of a resolution. If Ridgedale court is closed, the potential monetary costs to the Orono Police Department arc estimated to be over $47,000/year. Costs to Orono’s citizens, victims and witnesses cannot be estimated. COUNCIL ACTION REOUESTFD Motion to pass resolution opposing the closure of any suburban courthouse and requesting Hennepin Couty District Court to share information and cooperatively examine possible solutions for slate funding cuts. February 26,2003 Chief Judge Kevin Burke Assistant Chief Judge Lucy Wciland Dear District Court Judges, The City ofOrono, the Orono Police Department and its contract cities including Minnetonka Beach, Long Lake, Spring Park are very concerned over the proposed closing of the Ridgcdale Court, This closing has some tremendous negative impacts on police and prosecutorial operations, our budgets and our quality of life. Budgets that are already strapped will suffer additional burdens for the following reasons: We will spend more money in overtime to send officers to Brookdale, Southdale or Downtown, Ridgedalc is approximately six miles from our office. Brookdale and Southdale Centers are at least another 10-15 miles, through fairly heavy traffic. Because of fewer courtrooms in session, we will have more officers called who will be waiting on standby for ^heir cases to be heard. (There arc other large cities where subpoenaed officers arc sleeping in the court house hallways waiting for their cases to be heard). This is real hardship for people w'ho work shifts. During the winter months, our officers have about 15 court cases per month (often involving more than one officer.) In the busier season, we receive about 25 court notices per njonth. Our officers will need more lead time to respond to court. We can expect to add at least 25 hours in driving time and about 50 hours in increased waiting time/standby time at court. Given the 75 hours of labor time at about $45 per hour, we will add about $3,375 per month or about $45,500 per year. Many of our officers live in areas around the west end of the metro area. I would anticipate they will request reimbursement mileage rather than coming into the police station to pick up a squad to take to court. This will run about $90 per month. Parking costs will add another $60/monlh. These incidentals add about $1,800 a year. The alternative is a purchase of two additional “court cars" which will be about $40,000. r Our prosecutors will have a longer commute and these costs will be passed onto the smaller cities. In fact, they may decide it is not worth their time to serve our cities. That is a cost we can not afford. We are already unhappy with the concept of “hearing officers" dealing with moving violations which caused the removal of one judge from Ridgedale already. Getting witnesses and victims to cooperate in going to Brookdalc or Downtown will be challenging at best. People will have to arrange the extra time, obtain transportation, and cope with rising costs of parking, and meals. We will also have to send our one investigator judge hunting to get search warrants reviewed for signature. The woricload on our investigator is already considerable and it w ill not serve our citizens well to spend his valuable investigative time driving. The bottom line is that the criminal justice system is already cumbersome and slow and these choices make it considerably worse for the western cities in Hennepin County. The end result of the Ridgedale closing is that it offers more benefits to law breakers than to law enforcers, and the safety of our citizens is on the line. 1 encourag.* you to strongly consider other ways in which to cope with court administrative issues than to close the Ridgedale Court. Sincerely, Stephany Good Orono Chief of Police T A RESOLUTION OPPOSING THE CLOSURE OF ANY SUBURBAN COURTHOUSE AND REQUESTING HENNEPIN COUNTY DISTRICT COURT TO SHARE INFORMATION AND COOPERATIVELY EXAMINE POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS FOR STATE FUNDING CUTS WHEREAS, Hennepin County District Court Administrator Mark Thompson announced at the Criminal Justice Coordinating Committee (CJCC) meeting on February 27, 2003, tliat the District Court was considering closing one or more suburban courthouses in response to proposed state funding decreases; and WHEREAS, Court Administrator Thompson had budgetary or statistical information that he declined to share with CJCC participants because it was only in draft form; and WHEREAS, at no time has the leadership of the Hennepin County District Court involved the suburban cities in a cooperative effort to analyze possible measures to absorb the anticipated budget cuts; and WHEREAS, the closing of one or more suburban courthouses will result in the following: There will be much longer court calendars and overcrowding at the remaining courthouses, which do not have the space to absorb additional defendants and the court staff needed for the increased workload. Police olTiccrs will be off the streets for longer periods of time to travel longer distances and to wait longer periods of time for overcrowded court schedules. Suburban police departments will incur increased costs to pay for longer waiting times and additional officers to cover the longer absences. Suburban citizens will suffer major inconvenience from traveling longer distances and waiting longer periods of time to be heard. Page I of 3 Cooperation of civilian witnesses and crime victims with the prosecution will be lost, particularly in domestic abuse cases, due to the remote location and increased waiting time, and Prosecution costs will potentially increase if each city ’s cases are spread between more courtrooms. t WHEREAS, suburban cities recognize the real need to cut costs at the district court level; and WHEREAS, suburban cities are themselves struggling with proposed cuts in their own state funding; and WHEREAS, suburban cities wish to cooperate with the District Court in analyzing other alternatives that could avoid shifting the court ’s budget cuts to the cities. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota that: I.The City Council opposes the closure of any suburban courthouse because of the consequences listed above. 2.The leadership of the Hennepin County District Court is requested to immediately provide accurate budget and statistical information to the suburban cities and to meet cooperatively to examine possible solutions to the proposed funding cuts. 3.The City Administrator and the City Attorney are authorized to cooperate w’ith other suburban cities in creating a task force of representatives to meet with the Court. 4.The City Clerk is directed to provide copies of this resolution to the Chief Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court, the Chief Judge of the Heimepin County District Court, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners, the Hennepin County District Court Administrator, and the other suburban cities in Hennepin County. Page 2 of 3 I r Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held March 10.2003. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION •• • MAR I 0 200J ^m/3Oil r Or Date: Department Approva Item No: Administrator Reviewed;Agenda Section: Name: Title: Stephany Good Chief of Police </ Item Description: Accept School Resource OfTiccr Training Grant Exhibits: DISCUSSION The police department applied for a training grant for the “School Resource Officer Leadership Program" offered by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children through the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Ju\ cnile Justice Programs. On 1/30/03, the police department was notified that the grant was received for one officer to attend this course in Jacksonville, FL, from March 23-March 27. The grant covers tuition, student materials, instructional cost, transportation, and lodging. The participant is responsible for meals and incidental expenses. Officer Tony Wittke will be replacing Officer Schoenhoff as the next school resource officer. Officer SchoenholT is returning to patrol after six dedicated years of scr\ icc in the position. Officer Wittke applied for the assignment and was selected after successfully interviewing before a panel of Orono school officials and a police representative. COUNCIL ACTION REOUFSTFD Motion to accept th'* National Center for Missing and Exploited Children grant for the School Resource Leadership Program, March 23-27,2003. i. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MAH r DATE: March 7,2003 ITEM NO: /y ^ 0 200J Department Approval: Name Ron Moorsc Title City Administrator Administnitor Reviewed:t Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: 2002/2003/2004 Police Sergeant Contract Settlement 1 he Police Sergeant employee group had been a non*union group until they formed a bargaining unit in 2002. This required the negotiation of a new contract, which included a number of issues related to presets ing the City’s management rights and authority, as well as the economic issues such as pay and bcnetlts. We have now reached a settlement which does provide the language necessary to preserve the City’s management rights and authority, and also provides pay and benefits adjustments consistent with the City’s other employee groups, and with the market. The key elements of the settlement are as follows: £ay 2002: 3.75% increase(same as provided to other City employee groups) 2003; An increase sufficient to provide a 9% differential between the top Police Sergeant pay rate and the top Police Officer pay rate. The generally accepted differential in the market is 10%. I'he current differential is 7.75%. Because the Police Officers received a 3% pay increase for 2003, the Police Sergeant pay increase required to provide a 9% differential in 2003 is 4.25%. 2004: An incrcu.se sufficient to provide a 10% differential between the top Police Sergeant pay rate and the top Police Officer pay rate. Insurance Contribution 2002: Increase from $410 per month to $460.00 per month (same as other City employee groups) 2003: $500.00 per month (same as other City employee groups) 2004: Re-opencr Premium Holidays (holidays for which time worked is paid at one and one-halftimes the regular pay rate) 2002: Five premium holidays!same as Police Officers) 2003: Seven premium holidays 2004: Seven premium holidays Call Back Time. Court Standby Pav. and Iniur\' on Duty Pav 1 hesc are the same as received by the Police Officers(pIease see the attached language) Fmolover Authority The Employer Authority language is as follows; “The Employer retains the full and unrestricted right to operate and manage all manpower, facilities, and equipment; to establish functions and programs; to set and amend budgets; to determine the utilization of technology; to establish and modify the organizational structure; to select, direct, and t r CALL BACK TIME An employee who is called to duty during his scheduled off-duty time shall receive a minimum of two (2) hours pay at one and one-half (1-1/2) times Jthe employee's base pay rate. An extension or early report to a regularly scheduled shift for duty docs not qualify the employee for the two (2) hour minimum. COURT STANDBY TIME If an officer is placed on standby for court during the officer’s scheduled off-duty time, and if the court appearance is cancelled the day of the court date, the officer will receive standby pay in the amount of rtvo (2) hours of pay at the officer’s regular pay rate. If the employee owes time to the City the straight time standby will be subtracted from the balance owed. If the employee does not owe the City time, the employee will receive two (2) hours of pay at the regular rate. As an alternative, upon mutual agreement and if within the compensatory time accumulation maximum, the employee may receive rtvo (2) hours of compensatory time at the straight time rate. INJURY ON DUTY Employees injured during the performance of their duties for the EMPLOYER and thereby rendered unable to work for the EMPLOYER will be paid the difference between the employee’s regular pay and Worker’s Compensation insurance pa>ments for a period not to exceed ninety (90) working days per injury, not charged to the employee’s vacation, sick leave, or other accumulated leave, or other accumulated paid benefits, after a three (3) working day initial waiting period per injury. The three (3) day working day waiting period shall be charged to the employee’s sick leave account less Worker’s Compensation insurance. r ^ -••••• REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ——iMfi «« I 0 UK,} Oil f u«o/vo DATE: March 7.2003 ITEM NO: / ^ Department Approval: Name LinVee * J Title City Clerk V Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Licenses Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval KENNEL LICENSE 1. Don and Linda Lindau 666 Tonkawa Road 2. Sara Mussmann 2095 Salem Court COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve/deny the above listed licenses. .. V. r KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January 1,200__ to December 31, 200_ Owner: /h?) - Property A^ress: /f/ (include city and zip) Mailing Address (if different):__________________________________________ Phone: (home)<^f^ ~ ______(work) RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Fee: $25.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time:___ (over 6 months of age) Principal Breed: ^ Purpose for more than 2 dogs: Dogs normally kept: /^^^^Inside _*_kennel strucmre COMMERCIAL Kennel License Fee: $150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business: Business Activities: (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, reuil, etc.) Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name) (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono Ci^ Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigned hereby grants the City permission to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to ibide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. A/A Applicant Date For Cirv Use Only Kennel inspected Recommends: Approral Denial Date Q ' l • 4. • ' Lie ^ 1 ;r->v CIt Y VJ^O^;0/VO Owner : KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION - Effective January 1,200_^ to December 31,200_^ -fj. Hi '! Property Address: 9^ ''23 /^A// /V. C7{'0V]O^ f^W Mailing Address (if different): (include city and zip) Phone: inome) (work), RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Fee: $25.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time: 3 (over 6 months of age) Principal Breed: Purpose for more than 2 dogs ; rn • Dogs nonna^ kept: inside____kennel structure f li 3 OMMERCIAL>KeniierEicenseFee:/$150.00 ^ ^// ^ (payment must accompany application) Name of Business:___________ loarding. breeding, Wterinaiy care, retail, etc.) / li Business Activities: (example: boarding, breeding, Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name) (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigned hereby grants the City permission to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. SO ^d\o 3tod>3 Applicant Date For City Use Only Kennel inspected by Recommends: AppfdCdl ^ Denial Date o9./Z'^/o ^ CITY OF ORONO check register mar 1 0 200J ^••ruruHU/vo O3/06A)37;00AM Pag«1 ChMk Pay Chack Chack Number Emptoyee Name PtHoa * u e ■ 1 * Amount Data Chack Status 0S2548 PETERSON, BARBARA 3 $32322 3/10/03 Outstanding 052549 MOORSE, RONALD J.3 $346.31 3/10/03 Outstanding 052550 SANSEVERE, ROBERT K.3 $269.36 3/10/03 Outstanding 052551 MURPHY, JAMES L 3 $269 36 3/10/03 Outstanding 052552 NYOARO,JAY 3 $269.36 3/10/03 Outstanding 052553 WHITE, JAMES M.3 $269.36 $1.746 97 3/10/03 Outstanding t i-*. . . ' — r Ch9ck NtimiMr Employe N«m« 052496 052497 052498 052499 052500 052501 052502 052503 052504 052505 052506 052507 052508 052509 052510 052511 052512 052513 052514 052515 052516 052517 052518 052519 052520 052521 052522 052523 052524 052525 052526 052527 052528 052529 052530 052531 052532 052533 052534 052535 052495 052537 052538 052539 052540 052541 052542 052543 052544 052545 052546 052547 DODGE. RACHEL M. LESKINEN. DENISE M. K400RSE. RONALD J. VEE. LINDA 8. KUEHN. THOMAS M. OLSON. RONALD J. PETTIT. SANDRA K ANDERSON.BRUCE L BOBZIEN. SUE A BORIS. SCOTT W BUDIG. STACIE M. CARLSON. MICHAEL B CORNICK. JAMES L DEMBOUSKI. JAY C. ERICKSON. KURT R FARNIOK. CORREY L FISCHENICH. DAN T. FISCHER. CHRISTOPHER K GOOD. STEPHANY R HENDRICKS RONALD J. JOHNSON. JEFFREY MADSON. ADRIENNE M. MCNICHOLS. DAVID L MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES PERSELL. WILLIAM R SCHOENHOFF, JOHN B TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F. TOMCZYK. MARK W. WITTKE. ANTHONY A. ARNESON. JOSHUA A. HERMAN. JOHN R LEE. JOSEPH P BOLTERMAN. MATTHEW A BOTTENBERG. WENDY C. CHAPUT. JENNIFER L GAFFRON. MICHAEL P GAPPA GREGORY A. MEYER. WILLIAM C. OMAN. LYLE E VANG.BRUCE' BRINKHAUS. JOHN F. DEBAERE. DONALD L GREGORY. JAMES D HANSEN. STEVEN OBERAIGNER. SCOTT O. OBRIEN RANDY L PALMER. GREGORY A RATHBUN. BARRY J SKREEN. DALE S JENSEN. ROONEY W. ROSS. JOHN A STEFFENHAGEN. RONALD Pay Ptfiod 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 CITY OF ORONO check register Chack Amount $1.020 13 $903 96 $12 18 $1.229 96 $1.014 46 $12632 $470 20 $400 13 $769 81 $1.389 43 $653 02 $263 46 $1.313 76 $1.465 33 $1.52842 $1,681.50 $1,424 18 $94 62 $1,877.33 $1,331.58 $1.448 68 $651.70 $57029 $1,601.67 $607 56 $1,462 62 $64213 $1,395.12 $1.343 46 $67381 $845 58 $277.86 $1.084 79 $1,363 41 $1.239 70 $1.398 84 $1,706 74 $682 05 $19774 $1.299 96 $1.37267 $1,041 25 $89863 $1.243 46 $731 79 $1.129 80 $730 S4 $1.109 96 $1.134 04 $30 73 $77 84 $1.362 54 ChMk Data Chack Status 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3^ 5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/S03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 3/5/03 Outstanding 03AM/03 9 06 AM Page 1 $50,327 14 CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register© 03/06/03 4 48 PM Page 1 MARCH 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 PrimaryCash Paid Chk# 075523 3/10/2003 A.T.O.M. E 101-42110-433 Memberships & Subscriptions Total A.T.O.M. $25 00 Mbrship $2500 2003 ATOM Mbrship-DcmbousRI Paid Chk# 075524 3/10/2003 ANDERSON, KRISTI E 101-41300-319 Other Professional Services E 101-45200-319 Other Professional Services Tout ANDERSON, KRISTI $135 00 3/3/03 $135 00 3/3/03 $27000 CC Minutes 2/24 Park Minutes 3/3 Paid Chk# 075525 3/10/2003 AT * T WIRELESS SERVICES E 602-49450-321 Telephona $19.59 3419397 E 601-49400-321 Telephone $19 60 3419397 E 101-41900-321 Telephone $2365 3419397 ToUl AT S T WIRELESS SERVICES $62 84 Cell Phones Cell Phones Cell Phones Paid Chk# 075526 3/10/2003 BPI OF MINNESOTA. INC E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds E 101-41900-489 Other Miscellaneous Charges Tout BFI OF MINNESOTA, INC $78 90 1307115 $283.85 1307420 $362 75 Solid Waste - Bederwood Solid Waste - CH Paid Chk# 075527 3/10/2003 BIFFS INC. E 101 -45200-415 Other Equipment Rentals Total BIFFS INC. $130 26 W183901 $130 26 Waste Service - Bederwood Paid Chk# 075528 3/iC'2003 BROWNELLS. INC E 101 -42110-228 Training Supplies ToUl BROWNELLS, INC $29 58 265326 01 $29 58 Cieaning/Range Supplies Paid Chk# 075529 3/10/2003 CENTER POINT ENERGY -GC E 613-49830-381 Gas & Electric Total CENTER POINT ENERGY-GC $331.66 539004161700 Gas Service - GC $331 66 Paid Chk# 075530 3/10/2003 CENTERPOINT ENERGY---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E 602-49450-381 Gas & Electric E 101 41900-381 Gas & Electric E 101-41900-381 Gas & Electric $87 99 060006750600 Gas Service $2,970 59 060006750600 Gas Service $713.87 060006750600 Gas Service E 101 42110 781 Gas4Elec1ric E 601 49400-381 Gas & Electric Total CENTERPOINT ENERGY $584 08 0600067506C0 Gas Service $805 64 060006750600 Gas Serv.ce $5.16217 PaidCtik# 075531 3/10/2003 CHAMPION AUTO STORES E 101-43000-224 Street Maint Matenats/Supply E 101-43000-224 Street Mainl Materials/Supply ToUl CHAMPION AUTO STORES $37 12 0182785 $13 83 0182897 $50 95 Marker Lights Tie Straps - Banners Haid LhH# 075532 3/10/2003 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO £101^42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $35 00 23379 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $28 69 23379 E 101-42110-402 Repair»/Maint-Auto Equip $337 03 23434 OverkieSwlch-«l93 Replace HdlighI #188 Brakes. Oil #192 1 E 101 -4211 0-4C2 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $199 36 23437 Oil. Bell #189 i £101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $36 80 23443 Oil #191 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $179 62 23457 Oil. Trans Service #193 1 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip Total CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO $30 23 23475 $846 73 Oil #194 i r CITY OF ORONO Check Detail Register® 03A)6n34 4ePM Page 2 MARCH 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment Paid Chki 075533 3/10/2003 CITY Of LONO LAKE E 227-4550CM89 Other Miscellaneous Charges $74.92348 22003-3 800 Mhz Radios Total CITY OF LONO LAKE $74,923.48 Paid Chk# 075534 3/10/2003 OAHLKE TREE SERVICE E 101-43000-408 Contracted Street Maint.$937 50 2/20/03 Brackets. Wntr Banners ToUl OAHLKE TREE SERVICE $937 50 Paid dhk« 075535 3/10^3 OCA-VWRE ONLY G101-21719 DCA/Spending Accounts $1,721.77 3/4rt)3 Flex Spending 3/4/03 ToUl OCA • WIRE ONLY $1,721.77 Paid Chk# 075536 3/10/2003 OISPLAY SALES E 101-43000-224 Street Maint. Materials/Supply $16^4 INV0012344 Banding Straps - Banners Total OISPLAY SALES $1^.14 Paid Chk# 075537 3/10/2003 OOBO'S ■ E 101-41110-439 Meeting Expenses $12106 4834 Meals - Counal WS Total OOBO'S $12106 rejo crtKe 075538 3/10/2003 ENCHANTED GARDEN FLORAL E 101-41300-489 Other Miscellaneous Charges $5312 1896 LL City Hall Open House Total ENCHANTEO OAROEN FLORAL $53.12 Paid Chk# 075539 3/10/2003 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $54.32 44143 Triangular Scales Total ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS $54 32 Paid Chk# 075540 3/iO/2003 FARNIOK, CORREY E 101-42110-489 Other Miscellaneous Charges $35.00 2/28«)3 Pizza Total FARNIOK, CORREY $35 00 Paid Chk# 075541 3/10/2003 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL CO * E 602-49450-403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip $430.22 7813 Jet Rodder Hose Total FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL CO $430 22 Paid Clik# 075542 3/10/2003 FORTl's BENEFITS G 101-21712 Other Deductions $880 27 4019825-1 LTD 3/2003 Total FORTIS BENEFITS $880 27 Paid Chk# 075^3 3/10/2003 FRESHWATER SOCIETY E 101-41900-489 Other Miscellaneous Charges $220 00 3/13/2003 Rm Rental - Town Mtg Total FRESHWATER SOCIETY $220 00 Paid Chk# 075544 3/10/2003 GftKSERVICES E 101-43000-381 Gas & Electric $27 63 31-1300-9200Electrical Service E 602-49450-381 Gas & Electric $31 13 31-1300-9200Electrical Service G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $67 83 389643 Uniforms G 602-20200 Accounts Payable $2908 389643 Uniforms G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $495 3 389643 Shop Towels E 101-^2110-404 Repairs/Maint-BkJgsrGrounds $129 82 494531 Mat Service PO E 101-41900-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds $50 66 494532 Mat Service - Adm E 101-41900-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds $M66 494533 Mat Service - CC ToUl QAK8ERVICES $436 34 Paid Chk# 075545 3/10/2003 GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE INC. E 101 -43000-402 Repeirs/Meint-Auto Equip $663 43 58913 2003 Truck Intpachona F CITY OF ORONO Check Detail Register® 03/D6A)3 4 48 PM Page 3 MARCH 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment Tout GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE INC. S663 43 Paid Chk# 075546 3/10/2o6'3 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF--------------------- E 101-41600-309 Jail Charges $25121 2/19/03 Total HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF “ $25i .21 Booking Fees • 1/2003 Paul Chk» 075547 3/10/2003 HERMAN, JOHN E 101-42110-322 Postage Total HERMAN, JOHN $%.13 022603 $26 13 Shipping Charges Paid Chk# 075548 3/10/2003 HUMANE SOCIETY OF WRIGHT CO E 101-42110-317 AnimalCare $3,471.71 2003 ToUl HUMANE SOCIETY OF WRIGHT CO 2003 Impound Fee $3,471.71 Paid Chk# 075549 3/10/2003 KEEPERS E 101-42110-226 Clothing & personal equipment $185 44 10944 Total KEEPERS Pants • Sedey $185 44 Paid Chk# 075550 3/10/2003 LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS E 101-41300-340 General Advertising $117.00 25960 Total LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS Adv for Emp • CS $117.00 Paid Chk# 075551 3/10/2003 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES £101-41110-437 Training & Development Total LEAGUE OF MN CITIES $525.00^ 1-000012844 $52500 Leadership Conference Paid Chk# 075552 3/10/2003 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT G 101-20200 Accounts Payable G 101-20200 Accounts Payable Total LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT $1914 41516 $15 23 42276 Misc Supplies Cover $34.37 Paid Chk# 075553 3/10/2003 LUBE TECH E 101-43000-212 Motor Fuels S Lubricants Tout LUBE TECH M6934 930579 $469.34 Grease, OH. Washer Fluid Paid Chk# 075554 3/10/2003 MACA E 101-42110-433 Memberships & Subscriptions ToUl MACA $30 00 Ameson $3000 2003 MACA Dues • Ameson Paid Chk# 075555 3/10/2003 MAMA-GMC LABOR RELATIONS SERV E 101-42110-319 Other Professional Services $2.630 00 2003 Sub Total MAMA-GMC LABOR RELATIONS SERV $2,830 00 2003 MAMA Labor Rel Subscnpb Paid Chk# 075556 3/10^003 MCLEOD USA - PHONE BILLS E 101-42110-321 Telephone E 101-41900-321 Telephone E 601-49400-321 Telephone E 601-49400-321 Telephone E 602-49450-321 Telephone E 602-49450-321 Telephone Tout MCLEOD USA • PHONE BILLS $203.47 7927632 $474 78 7927632 $2261 7927632 $39 45 7927632 $42 J5 7i}27632 » ■ . 7927632 $836 01 Phone Service Phone Service Phone Service Phone Service Phone Service Phone Service Paid Chk# 075557 3~10/2003 MIDWEST FUELS E 101-43000-212 Motor Fuels S Lubricants G 101-14101 Gasoline Inventory E 101-43000-212 Motor Fuefo s Lubricants $1.44713 12100 $3.51581 12100 $1,132.45 12108 987 8 Gals Diesel 2322 2 Gals Unleaded 773 Gats - Diesel 4 CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register^ 03/06/03 4:48 PM Page 4 Total MIDWEST FUELS MARCH 2003 Chacfc Amt Invol':# Comment $6.095 39 Paid Chk« 075558 3/10/2003 MINN COMM E 101-42110-321 Telepttone E 602-49450-321 Telephone E 601-49400-321 Telephone Total MINN COMM $38 04 $32 35 $32.35 20261003030 Police Pagers 48300503033 Pagers-PW 48300503033 Pagers-PW $102.74 Paid Chk« 075559 3/10/2003 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts S Accessories $14.31 RI02030885 Medical Oxygen E 10M3000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $28 63 RI0203884 Acetylene. Oxygen Total MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY $42 94 Paid Chk# 075560 3/10/2003 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIONS E 10M21 10-340 General Advertising $210 85 569350 Adv for Emp • Police E 101-41300-340 General Advertising $197 80 573568 Adv for Emp - CS Total MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIONS $408 65 Paid Chki 075561 3/10/2003 MN CHAPTER OF lAPMO E 101-42400-433 Memberships & Subscriptions $30.00 Orono 2003 MN lAMPO Membership Total MN CHAPTER OF lAPMO $30 00 Paid Chkt 075562 3/10/2003 NATIONAL WATERWORKS E 601-43400-227 Utility System Main!. Supplies $67.18 9176286 Upper Rod Total NATIONAL WATERWORKS $6718 Paid Chk# 075563 3/10/2003 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS G 101-21710 Lif# Insurance $288 00 6732303 PERA Life - 3/2003 Tout NCPERS GROUP UFE INS $28800 Paid Chk# 075564 3/10/2003 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS E 101-42110-321 Telephone $802.17 506573311-01 Police Cell Phones Total NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS $802 17 Paid Chk# 075565 3/10/2003 OFFICE DEPOT E 101-42110-201 Office supplies $5220 Office Supplies E 101-41900-201 Ofnca supplies $6378 Office Supplies Tout OFFICE DEPOT $115 98 Paid Chk# 075566 3/10/2003 OWL ENGINEERING. INC E 601-49400-319 Other Professional Services $300 00 1867 Antenna Consultation Total OWL ENGINEERING, INC $300 00 Paid Chk# 075567 3/10/2003 PIONEER E 101-41900-352 Printing & Publishing $4812 485 2003 Material & Equip E 101-42400-340 General Advertising $83 58 506 Applications E 101-42400-340 General Advertising $45 77 507 ApHlication 2873 E 101-42400-340 General Advertising $29 85 508 Application 2870 Total PIONEER $207 32’ Paid Clt'k# 075568 3/10/2003 PIRTEK E 101-43000-403 Repairs/Mafnt-Misc Equip $4827 PL18721 Pressure Wash Assembiey Total PIRTEK $4827’ E 101-42110-404 Repatrs/Maml-Bidgs/Grounds $107.83 S-68807 Ant Control •1 F CITY OF ORONO 03A)6A>3 4:48PM Page 5 *Check Detail Register© MARCH 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment Tout PLUNKETTS $107.63 Paid Chki 075570 3/10/2003 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC. G 101-20200 Accounts Payable G 101-20200 Accounts Payable E 101-42110-407 Janitoriat Services E 101-41900-407 Janitorial Services E 101-42110-407 Janitorial Services E 101-41900-407 Janitorial Services E 101 -42110-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Orounds E 101-41900-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds Total POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC. $941.90 $1,151 21 $650 15 $1.039 07 $76201 $931.34 $1,917.49 $2.^356 $9.93675 9749 9749 9750 9750 9756 9756 9757 9757 Janitorial -12/2002 Janitorial • 12/2002 Janitorial -1/2003 Janitorial -1/2003 Janitonal - 2/2003 Janitorial - 27003 Carpet. Tile, Partitions Carpet. Tile, Partitions i^aidChk# 075571 3/107003 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS E 101-41900-401 Repairs/Maint-OfRce Equip $146 00 E 101-42110-401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip Total PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS $222.00' Paid thki 07557r 74679 74679 2003 - Maint Contract-Dictatk) 2003 - Maint Contract-Dictatk) 3/'1 07003 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE G 101 -15996 Non-Employee Health Ins $25.65 G 101-21710 Life Insurance $65.60 G 101-21710 Life Insurance $587.50 ToUl PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 37003 37003 37003 Life Insurance 37003 Life Insurance 37003 Life Insurant 37003 $699.15 Paid Chki 075573 3/107003 PUBLICORP. INC E 101-41500-208 Books 6. Periodicals Total PUBLICORP. INC $85 00 2/12/03 $85.o6 Tif Reporting Ref Book Paid Chki 075574 3/107003 SAFETY SIGNS E 101-43000-415 Other Equipment Rentals Total SAFETY SIGNS $54.99 $54 99 30124 Barricades Paid ChBi 075575 3/107003 SIGNS OF THE SEASON E 101-43000-224 Street Maint. Materlals/Supply E 101-43000-224 Street Maint. Materials/Supply Tout SIGNS OF THE SEASON $242 82 $59J54 $302^ 1062 1066 W Femdale Bridge Postings W Ferndale Bridge Postings Paid Chki 075576 3/107003 SNYDER DRUG STORES E 101-42110-201 Office supplies E 101-42110-201 Office supplies E 101-42110-201 Office supplies E 101-42110-201 Office supplies E 101-42110-201 Office supplies ToUl SNYDER DRUG STORES $9 56 $1277 $1169 $4 24 $2841 $66 67 1/31/03 2/11/03 2/4/03 2/4/03 27/03 Batteries Film Processing Audio Tapes Gel Roller Pens Batteries. Film Proc Paid Chki 075577 3/10/2003 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 0930943030 Diesel • Truck 431 Total SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC $46 50 ?iid"Chki»"075578 3/10/2003 STAR WEST E 602-49450-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip Tout STAR WEST $1,004 19 $1,004 19 174029 Injection Pump i712 Paid Chki 075579 3/107003 THE HOME DEPOT E 101 -42110-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Gfounds E 101-41900-223 BldgK$rounds Maint Supplies $20 00 $49 03 174/03 27/03 Lumber - Armory Ceiling-PO CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 03A06A)3 4:48 PM Page 6 MARCH 2003 Tout THE HOME DEPOT S69 03 Invoice Comment Paid Chki 0755M 3/10/2003 TKDA E 402-48032-304 Engineering-ConsuKing E 601-49400-405 RepairayMaint-Watermains/ptant Total TKDA $425 84 060691 $221.90 80909 $^7.74 OCB Rd - TH12 to Fox Locate Leak-3630 Livingston Paid Chk# 075581 3/10/2003 TWIN CITY OARAGE DOOR CO. E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgt/Orounds $76 00 162341 Overhead Doon - Wtr Pint E101-42110-404 Repalra«lalnl-BldasA3rounds $76 00 162342 Overhead Doors • PO Tout TWIN CITY OARAGE DOOR CO.$152 00 Paid Chk# 075582 3/10/2003 UNITED RENTALS E 602-49450-415 Other Equipment Rentals $70 29 617212 Barricade Rental Total UNITED RENTALS $70 29 Paid Chk# 075583 3/10/2003 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE E 101-41900-322 Pottage $150.00 Permit Annual Mailing Permit Total UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE $150 00 Paid Chk# 075584 3/10/2003 VERIZON WIRELESS E 601-49400-321 Telephone $14 19 1003-4585141Utility Cell Phone E 602-49450-321 Telephone $14.19 1003-4585141Utility Cell Phone E 101-41900-321 Telephone $442.44 10035922058Cell Phones Total VERIZON WIRELESS $470 82 Paid Chk# 075585 3/10/2003 VIKINO INDUSTRIAL CENTER G101-19999 Suspense Account $1W04 117273 Replace CK 75500 Total VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER $1M04 Paid Chk# 075586 3/10/2003 XCEL ENERGY E 101-43000-381 Gas & Electric $115 84 1449500726 Hwy 12 & Willow E 101-43000-381 Gas & Electric $243 88 Allocation Electrical Service E 602-49450-381 Gat 8 Electric $1.359 30 Allocation Electrical Service E 601-49400-381 Gat & Electric $3.018 93 Allocation Electrical Service E 101-41900-381 Gas & Electnc $1.292 27 Allocation Electricat Service E 101-42110-381 GasSEIecInc $513 22 Allocation Electrical Service E 101-45200-381 Gat & Electric $23 52 Allocation Electrical Service E 101-42110-381 Gas & Electric $9 42 Allocation Electncal Service E 613-49830-381 Gas & Electric $188 09 Allocation Electncal Service E 101-43000-386 Street Lighting $1,271 10 Street Street Lighting - 2^003 Total XCEL ENERGY $8.03557 10100 Primary Cash $127,510.47 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 227 IMPR/EQUIP CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 402 MUNICIPAL ST AID ST CONSTUCT 601 WATER OPERATING FUND 602 SEWER OPERATING FUND 613 GOLF COURSE 10100 Primary Cash S43.849S2 S74.92348 S425S4 S4.541 85 $3,250 03 $519 75 $127.510 47 CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Registeitg) 03A)6A)3 4.48 PM Page 1 MARCH 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 Primary Cash Paw Chk# 075523 3/10/2003 A.T.O.M. E 101-42110-433 Memberships & Subscriptions ^5 00 Mbrship 2003 ATOM Mbrship-Dembouski Total A.T.O.M.$25 bo - Paid Ch^ 075524 3/10/2003 ANDERSON, KRISTI E 101-41300-319 Other Professional Services $135.00 3AV03 CC MinuUs 2/24 E 101-45200-319 Other Professional Services $135 00 3«/03 Park Minutes 3/3 Total ANDERSON, KRISTI $270 00 Paid Chki 075525 3/10/2003 AT A T WIRELESS SERVICES E 602-49450-321 Telephone $19 59 3419397 Celt Phones E 601-49400-321 Telephone $1960 3419397 Cell Phones E 101-41900-321 Telephone $23 65 3419397 Cell Phones ToUl AT ST WIRELESS SERVICES $62 64 Paid Chk# 075526 3/10/2003 BFI OF MINNESOTA, INC C 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds $78.90 1307115 Solid Waste - Bederwood E 101 -41900-489 Other Miscellaneous Charges $283.65 1307420 Solid Waste - CH ToUl BFI OF MINNESOTA, INC $362.75 Paid Chk# 075527 3/10/2003 BIFFS INC. E 101-45200-415 Other Equipment Rentals S1M 26 W183901 Waste Service - Bederwood Total BIFFS INC.$l ’30 26 Paid Chk# 075528 3/10/2003 BROWNELLS, INC E 101-42110-228 Training Supplies $2958 265326 01 Cleaning/Range Supplies ToUl BROWNELLS, INC $2958 Paid Chk# 075529 3/10/2003 CENTER POINT ENERGY-6c E 613-49830-381 Gas & Electric $331 66 539004161700 Gas Service-GC ToUl CENTER POINT ENERGY - GC $331 66 Paid Chk# 075530 3/10/2003 CENTERPOINT ENERGY E 602-49450-381 Gas & Electric $87 99 060006750600 Gas Service E 101-41900-381 Gas & Electric $2,970 59 060006750600 Gas Service E 101-41900-381 Gas & Electric $713 87 060006750600 Gas Service E 101-421*0-381 Gas 8 Electric $584 08 060006750600 Gas Service E 601-49400-381 Gas & Electric $805 64 060006750600 Gas Service Tout CENTERPOINT ENERGY $5.16217 TPaid Chk# 075531 3/10/2003 CHAMPION AUTO STORES E 101-43000-224 Street Maint Materiats/Supply $37.12 D182785 Marker Lights E 101-43000-224 Street Maint Materials/Suppty $13 83 0182897 Tie Straps - Banners ToUl CHAMPION AUTO STORES $5095 KaiQ unwp g/5532 3/10/2003 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $35 00 23379 OverideSwlch-#l93 E 101 -42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $28 69 23379 Replace Hdlight #188 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $337 03 23434 Brakes. Oil #192 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $199 36 23437 Oil. Belt #189 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $36 80 23443 Oil #191 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $17962 23457 Oil. Trans Service #193 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $3923 23475 Oil #194 Total CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO $846 7’' tj f CITY OF ORONO Check Detail Register® 03/06/03 4.48 PM Page 3 MARCH 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment ToUl QARTS DIESEL SERVICE INC.$663 43 Paid Chkf 07SM6 3/10/2003 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHtRIFP £ 101-41600*309 Jail Charges $25121 2/19/03 Booking Fees • 1/2003 Total HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF $251 21 Paid Chk# 075547 3/10/2003 HERMAN, JOHN E 101-42110-3P2 Postage $2613 022603 Shipping Charges Total HERMAN. JOHN $26 13 Paid Chk# 075548 3/10/2003 HUMANE SOCIETY OP WRIGHT CO E 101-42110-317 AnimalCare $3,471 71 2003 2003 Impound Fee Tout HUMANE SOCIETY OF WRIOHT CO $3,471.71 Paid Chk# 0/5549 3/10/2003 KEEPERS E 101-42110-226 Clothing & personal equipment $185 44 10944 Pants - Sedey ToUl KEEPERS $185 44 Paid Chk# 075550 3/10/2003 LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS E 101 -41300-340 General Advertising $117 00 25960 Adv for Emp - CS Total LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS $117.00 Paid Chk# 075551 3/10/2003 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES E 101-41110-437 Training & Development $525 00 1-000012844Leadership Conference Total LEAGUE OF MN CITIES $525 00 Paid Chk# 075552 3/10C?003 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT G 101 -20200 Accounts Payable $1914 41516 Misc Supplies G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $15_23 42276 Cover ToUl LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT $34 37 Paid Chk» 075553 3/10/2003 LUBE TECH E 101-43000-212 Motor Fuels & lubricants $469 34 930579 Grease. Oil. Washer Fluid ToUl LUBE TECH $469 34 Paid ChKi 075554 3/10/2003 MACA E 101-42110-433 Memberships & Subscnptions $30 00 Arneson 2C03 MACA Dues • Arneson Tout MACA $30 00 Paid Chk# 075555 3/10/2003 MAMA-GMC LABOR RELATIONS SERV E 101-42110-319 Other Prolessiona! Services $2 830 00 2003 Sub 2003 MAMA Labor Ret Subscripti Total MAMA-GMC LABOR RELATIONS SERV $2.830 00 Paid Chk# 075556 3/10/2003 MCLEOD USA • PHONE BILLS E 101-42110-321 Telephone $203 47 7927632 Ph<m Servl^ E 101-41900-321 Telephone $474 78 7927632 Phone Service E 601 -49400-321 Telephone $22 61 7927632 Phone Service E 601-49400-321 Telephone $3945 7927632 Phone Service E 602-49450-321 Telephone $42 95 7927632 Phone Service E 602-49450-321 Telephone $52 75 7927632 Phone Service Total MCLEOD USA. PHONE BILLS $836 01 Paid Chk# 075557 3/1072003 MIDWEST FUELS E 101-43000-212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants $1,447.13 12100 987.8 Gals Diesel 0 101-14101 Gasoline Inventory $3.51581 12100 2322 2 Gals Unleaded E101-43000-212 Motor Fuels S Lubricants $1,132.45 12108 773 Gaii - Diesel CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 03A)6A)3 4 46 FM Page 4 MARCH 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment Total MIDWEST FUELS $6,095.39 Paid Chk* 075558 3/10/2C03 MINN COMM E 101-42110-321 Telaphone $38 04 20261003030Police Pagers E602-49450-321 Telaphone $32 35 48300503033Pagers - PW E 601-49400-321 Telephone $32 35 48300503033Pagers-PW ToUl MINN COMM $102.74 Paid Chk« 075559 3/10/2003 MINNEAPOUS OXYGEN COMPANY E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts S Accessories $1431 RI02030885 Medical Oxygen E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $28 63 RI0203884 Acetylene. Oxygen Total MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY $42 94 Paid Chk« 075560 3/10/2003 MINNESOTA SUN PUBUCATIONS E 101-42110-340 General Advertising $210 85 569350 Adv for Emp - Police E 101-41300-340 General Advertising $19780 573568 Adv for Emp - CS Totol MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIONS $408.65 ^aid Chk# 075561 3/10/2003 MN CHAPTER OF lAPMO E 101-42400-433 Memberships & Subscriptions $30_^00 Orono 2003 MN lAMPO Membership Total MN CHAPTER OF lAPMO $30 00 Paid Chk0 075562 3/100003 NATIONAL WATERWORKS E 601-49400-227 Utility System Maint. Supplies $67.18 9176286 Upper Rod Total NATIONAL WATERWORKS $67.18 Paid Chk# 075563 3/10/2003 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS G 101-21710 Life Insurance $268 00 6732303 PERA Life - 3/2003 Total NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS $268 00 Paid Chki 075564 3/100003 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS E 101-42110-321 Telephone $802 17 506573311-01 Police Cell Phones ToUl NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS $802.TV Paid Chk# 075565 3/100003 OFFICE DEPOT E 101-42110-201 Office supplies $52 20 Office Supplies E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $6378 Office Supplies Total OFFICE DEPOT $115 98 Paid Chki 075V. 3 3 10/2003 OWL ENGINEERING JNC E 601 -49400-319 Other Professional Services $300 00 1867 Antenna Consultation ToUl OWL ENGINEERING. INC $300.00 Paid Chki 075567 3/10/2003 PIONEER E 101-41900-352 Printing & Publishing $48 12 485 2003 Material & Equip E 101-42400-340 General Advertising $83 58 506 Applications E 101-42400-340 General Advertising $45 77 507 /Vplllication 2873 E 101-42400-340 General Advertising $29 85 508 Application 2870 Total PIONEER $207.32 Paid Chk# 0755M 3/10/2003 PIRTEK E 101-43000-403 Repairs/Mamt-Misc Equip $4827 PL18721 Pressure Wash Assembly Total PIRTEK $48 27 Paid Chk# 075569 3/10/2003 PLUNKETTS E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldga/Grounds $107 63 S-6S807 Ant Control CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 03A)6/03 4 48 PM Pages MARCH 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment ToUl PLUNKETTS $107.83 PaidChke 075570 3/10/2003 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC. G 101-20200 Accounts Payable G 101-20200 Accounts Payable E 101 -42110-407 Janitorial Services E 101-41900-407 Janitorial Services E 101-42110-407 Janitorial Services E 101-41900-407 Janitorial Services E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds E 101-41900-404 Repairs.Maint-Bldgs/Grounds ToUl POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC. $941 90 $1,151 21 $850 15 $1,039.07 $76201 $931 34 $1.91749 $2,343 58 $9,936 75 9749 9749 9750 9750 9756 9756 9757 9757 Janitorial - 12/2002 Janitorial -12/2002 Janitorial - 1/2003 Janitorial -1/2003 Janitorial-2/2003 Janitorial - 2/2003 Carpet. Tile. Partitions Carpet. Tile. Partitions >aid Chki 075571 3/10/2003 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS E 101-41900-401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip $148 00 E 101-42110-401 Repairs/Maint-OfTice Equip $74 00 ToUl PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS $222 00 74679 74679 2003 2003 Maint Contract-Dictatio Maint Contract-Dictatio PaidChk# 075572 3/10/2003 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE G 101-15998 Non-Employee Health Ins G 101-21710 Life Insurance G 101-21710 Life Insurance ToUl PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE $2585 $85 80 $587 50 $699 15 3/2003 3/2003 3/2003 Life Insurance 3/2003 Life Insurance 3/2003 Life Insurance 3/2003 Paid Chk# 075573 3/10/2003 PUBLICORP. INC E 101-41500-208 Books & Periodicals ToUl PUBLICORP. INC $85 00 2/12/03 $8500 Tif Reporting Ref Book Paid Chk# 075574 3/10/2003 SAFETY SIGNS E 101-43000-415 Other Equipment Rentals Total SAFETY SIGNS $54 99 $54 99 30124 Barricades PaidChke 075575 3/10/2003 SIGNS OF THE SEASON E 101-43000-224 Street Maint Matenals/Supply E 101-4300C-224 Street Maint Materials/Supply ToUl SIGNS OF THE SEASON $242 82 $59 64 $302 46 1062 1068 W Ferndale Bridge Postings W Ferndale Bridge Postings Paid Chk# 075576 3/10/2003 SNYDER DRUG STORES E 101 42110-201 Office supplies E 101-42110-201 Office supplies E 101-42110-201 Office supplies E 101-42110-201 Office supplies E 101-42110-201 Office supplies Total SNYDER DRUG STORES $9 56 $1277 $11 69 $424 $28 41 $66 67 1/31/03 2/11/03 2/4/03 2/4/03 2/7/03 Battenes Film Processing Audio Tapes Gel Roller Pens Batteries. Film Proc PaidChk# 075577 3/10/2003 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC E ^01-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $46 50 0930943030 Diesel-Taick 431 Tout SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC $46 50 Paid Chk# 075578 3/10/2003 STAR WEST E 602-49450-402 Repalrs/Maint-Auto Equip ToUl STAR WEST $1,004 19 $1.004 19 174029 Injection Pump #712 Paid Chk# 075579 3/10/2003 THE HOME DEPOT E 101 -42110-404 Repairs/Maint-Bidgs/Grounda E 101-41900-223 Btdg/GroufKls Maint Supplies $20 00 $4903 1/24/03 27/03 Lumber - Armory Ceiling - PO L JL jyi CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 03A16/03 4:48 PM Page 6 MARCH 2003 Total THE HOME DEPOT ChackAmt $69.03 Invoice Comment PaWChWI 075580 3/10/2003 TKO/S E 402-48032>304 Engineering-Conaulting E 601 •49400-405 Repaira/Maint-Walennaina/plant Total TKOA $425 64 060691 $221.90 60909 OCBRd-TH12toFox Locate Leak-3630 Livingiton $647.74 Paid Chk# 075561 3/100003 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO. E 602-49450-404 Repaifs/Maint-Bldga/Orounds $76.00 162341 E 101-42110-404 Repaira/Maint-8ldgs/Orounds $76.00 162342 Total TWIN CITY OARAGE DOOR CO. Overtnad Doors • Wlr Pint Ovetliead Doors • PD $152.00 Poid Chk# 075582 3/10/2003 UNITED RENTALS E 602-49450-415 Other Equipment Rentals Total UNITEO RENTALS $70 29 617212 Barricade Rental $7029 Paid Chki 075583 3/KV2003 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE E 101-41900-322 Postage $150.00 Perma Total UNITEO STATES POSTAL SERVICE Annual Mailing Permit $150.00 Paid Chk« 075584 3/10/2003 VERIZON WIRELESS E 601-49400-321 Telephone E 602-49450-321 Telephone E 101-41900-321 Telephone Total VERIZON WIRELESS $14.19 10034565141 Utility CeH Phone $14 19 1003-4585141 Utility Cell Phone $44244 10035922058 Cell Phones $470.82 Paid Chk# 075885 3/10/2003 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER G101-19999 Suspense Account $190.04 117273 Total VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER $1^ 6^' Replace Ck 75500 Paid Chk# 075586 3/10/2003 XCEL ENERGY E 101-43000-381 Gat & Electric E 101-43000-381 Gas 8 Electric E 602-49450-381 Gas 8 Electric E 601-49400-381 Gas 8 Electric E 101-41900-381 Gat 8 Electric E 101-42110-381 Gat8Electrie E 101-45200-381 Gat 8 Electric E 101-42110-381 Gas8Electnc E 613-49830-381 Gat 8 Electric E 101-43000-386 Street Lighting Total XCEL ENERGY $115 84 $24388 $1.359 30 $3.01893 $1.292 27 $51322 $23 52 $9 42 $188 09 $1,271 10 $8.03'5 57 1449500726 Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Street Hwy 12 8 Willow Electrical Service Electrical Servico Electrical Service Electrical Service Electrical Service Electrical Service Electrical Service Electrical Service Street Lighting - 2/2003 10100 Primary Cash $127,510.47 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 227IMPR/EQUIP CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 402 MUNICIPAL ST AID ST CONSTUCT 601 WATER OPERATING FUND 602 SEWER OPERATING FUND 613 GOLF COURSE 10100 Primary Cash $43.849 52 $74 923 48 $425 84 $4,541 65 $3.25003 $519.75 $127.510 47 CITY OF ORONO Check Detail Register© QZmm 4:48 PM Page 1 MARCH 2003 Check Amt Invoice Commenl 10100 PfImefyCesh f>aU£hk*07S^ 2/27/2003 AN0ER80N, KRISTI E 101-42400^19 OttMT ProleMlonal ScfviOM Tom ANDERSON, KRISTI $325.00 2/19/03 $325.00 Planning 2/19/03 Paid Chk0 075509 2/27/2003 DCA • WIRE OMLY------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------— 0101-21719 DCA/Spending Accounts $2.463 96 2/2SAI3 Flax Spending • 2/25/03 ToM OCA-WIREONLY $2,463.96 Paw ChUP 075510 2/27/2003 DEPUTY REGISTRAR----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------— E 101-42110-441 Licenses A Taxes $9.50 2/19/D3 Annual Reg - Unmarked Sqd TotM DEPUTY REGISTRAR $9.50 10100 Primary Cash $2,798.46 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 10100 Primary Cash $2.798 46 $2.798 46 4 -V ; .»• : A. ' i Mar Oil ^ ^hu • •infobmation •Mu . .4 ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING iMn OF MAR t 0 2005 ' ciry OFORONo ii :i h' ^ % . f ^ ■? t>. "> ■,. % »