The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02-24-2003 Council PacketFEB 2 4 2003 AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, FEBRUARY ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (•) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet. ROLL CALL CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approve/Amend APPROVAL OF MINUTES • 2. Regular Council Meeting of February 10,2003 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Andrew McDermott PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - J. Marc Fritzler PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 3. 4. 5. 6. #03-2872 Terry & Christy Morse, 2080 Spates Avenue - Variance - Resolution #03-2866 Judy & David Zoschke, 2040 Shadywood Road - Variances - Resolution #03-2868 John E. Whitman, 1580 Sixth Avenue N. - Variance - Resolution #03-2873 City of Orono - Comp Plan Amendment (MUSA) MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR'S REPORT 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Schedule an Assessment Hearing for North Arm Lane Paving Project! Renew Park Mowing Contract Purchase Replacement Utility Truck North Long Lake E. - Sewer Project Bid Award - Equipment & Materials Bid 2003 West Femdalc Road Bridge Replacement - Resolution j f I \ AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, FEBRUARY 24,2003,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Payment of Maple Plain Fire Service Costs WeCan Request for Support of CDBG Funding Pay Request for Long Lake Fire Station Purchase Three New Squad Cars Bid Award for Equipment Certificates - Resolution 2002/2003/2004 Police Sergeant Contract Designation of City Representative to MCWD Upgrade and Moving of Police Oxygen System CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 21. LICENSES Kennel License Renew als Special Event * 22. BILLS UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 2003 03/03 - Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p.m. 03/10 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 03/17 - Planning Commission, 6:30 p.m. 03/24 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 04/07 04/14 04/21 04/28 Park Commission Meeting 7:15 p.m. Council Meeting, 7.00 p.m. Planning Commission, 6:30 p.m. Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. J Public Attendance Meeting Date J r, < (a Council □ Planning Commission □ Park Commission □ Other Please nLLOUTTHE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME (please print) ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER \/f 2.. 3. tv ^A.X _____1 C<_ i '/ *•' 'ii ^ A j.A3 JM l L> 4. 5. 6.. 7.. 8. 9. 10. 11.i 12. 13.. 14. 15. 99 UwfttUfmnm • OMIMORMSVn BUCaAIT iHMAl ORONO CITY COUNat MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10,2003 FEB 2 4 2003 CITY OF ORONQ ROLL The Council mci on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Barbara Peterson, Council Members Bob Sansevere, Jay Nygard. Jim White, and Jim Murphy. Representing staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, City Planner Wendy Bottenberg, City Attorney Tom Barrett, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, Public Services Director Greg Gappa, and Recorder Alissa Wintemheimer. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. -P OATH OF OFRCE Moorse administered the Oath of OfBce to Mayor Peterson, Jim Murphy, and Bob Sansevere. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approvc/Amend Items 2, 10,11,13, 14,15, 16, 17, 18,19, and 20 were added to the Consent Agenda. Item 9 was removed from the Consent Agenda. Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to approve the consent agenda as amended. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES *2. Amend Minutes of the Regular Council meeting of January 13,2003 Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to approve the amended Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of January 13,2003, removing the second sentence of paragraph 10 on page 9, regarding Stephany Grand because it has been determined to be a false statement. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *3. Regular Council Meeting of January 27,2003 Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of Januar>' 27,2003. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. I .■> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10,2003 APPEAL 4. Reconsideration of Appeal of Narrows Saloon Liquor Violation Penalty Fee Moorse stated that Mr. Anderst ’s attorney had sent a letter stating that he was withdrawing his appeal and would not attend the Council meeting. Sergeant Kurt Erickson stated that for the last two years the police have been checking alcohol compliance with someone who obviously appears to be under 21 . Previously, O’Sullivan ’s had raised concerns about this person because he is a part-time Community Service Officer who was recognized by one of the clients at O’Sullivan ’s. However, the person who performed the compliance check at the Narrows Saloon, Joe Lee, does not live in the area and is seldom in the area. Lee checked a number of businesses on July 26,2002. He entered the Narrows Saloon by the back entrance and sat at the bar rail near the pool table. He ordered a beer, then watched the waitress pour the tap herself. He paid her S3 for the beer, then used a cell phone to call an officer sitting outside. The officer came in, and Lee told him who had served him the beer. The officer ticketed the server and told her she would be criminally charged, and that they would notify Anderst of the violation. In court, the waitress pled guilty, apologized, and never mentioned feeling entrapped or recognizing Joe Lee. Those issues were not raised until 5-6 months after-the-fact by Mr. Anderst. Murphy stated that Anderst failed to pay his fine until his license came up for renewal and he was forced to. Anderst wrongly accused a woman of passing bad checks. When Murphy stated at the January 13^ meeting that he wanted Anderst to support the City’s efforts to preve.nt underage drinking, he did not offer his support. Murphy stated that all of those incidents were troubling to him. He stated Council had learned a good lesson and he hoped that the business with Anderst and the fees was now finished. Sansevere echoed Murphy’s sentiment. Sergeant Erickson stated that the police offer training to all bar and liquor store employees and encourage them to enforce a policy of carding anyone who appears under 30. Nygard stated they never should have allowed the appeal hearing to go forward when Mr. Anderst arrived late to the last meeting. Nygard moved, and Mayor Peterson seconded, to enforce the fine of $500 for a first offense violation based on the letter from Anderst’s attorney withdrawing his appeal and the evidence presented by Sergeant Erickson. >’ote; Ayes 5, Nays 0. T --- ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10,2003 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS None. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS None. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT *5. #02-2753 Wesley Byrne, 2817 Casco Point Road—Reaffirm Plan Approval- Resolution No. 4924 Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4924 reaffirming the original approval to allow construction per the approved site plan. Vole: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *6. #02-2854 Kevin Manley, 1973 Fagerness Point Road—Variances/Conditional Use Permit—Resolution No. 4925 Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4925 granting a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2; 10.55, Subdivision 8; and 10.56, Subdivisions 16(J) and I6(L) to permit the construction of boulder retaining walls constituting hardcover in the 0-75’ zone where no harcover is normally allowed, and to permit grading and land alterations within the 0-75’ lakeshore protected area where such work is normally prohibited per the submitted plan Option 1 revised to incorporate downspouts and gutters, and further grants a Conditional Use Permit for land alterations within the 0-75’ lakeshore protected zones and w ithin 5’ of a lot line per the approved grading plan and site plan. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *7. #02-2861 Erik Thompson, 1940 Concordia Street—Variances—Resolution No. 4926 Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4926 granting a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6(B) to allow construction of a second stoiy- to the existing house to be 14’ from the front lot line ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10,2003 *7. #02-2861 Erik Thompson, 1940 Concordia Street—Variances—Resolution No. 4926—Continued where 30* is required in the LR-IC zooning district and to permit 2,840 s.f. (17.9%) of structural lot coverage where 2371 s.f. (15%) is allowed. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *8. 1(02-2862 Steven Gronwall, 1586 Long Lake Boulevard—Variances —Resolution No. 4927 Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4927 a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivbion 6(B) to allow construction of a new attached garage with a second story to the existing house to be 4.5* from the rear lot line where 50* is required, 14* from the side yard adjacent street lot line where 50* is required in the LR-1A zoning district and to allow 2,313 s.f. (3534%) hardcover in the 250-500* setback zone where 1,963.5 s.f. (30%) is allowed. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 9. #02-2863 Richard Kail, 3753 Casco Avenue—Variances White stated he remov ed it from the Consent Agenda because he wondered if the house could be moved further -;ilh to reduce structural coverage. Bottenberg .«5tated that it could not. Structural coverage is a total site figure, so he’d be over the allowed coverage no matter where the house is positioned on the lot. White stated that the lot was the worst one on Casco Point. He stated there are City- owned lots adjacent to the Kail’s that are used for dumping garbage. White suggested allowing the Kail’s to buy one of the lots and clean it up, increasing their lot size to allow a larger structure on the site. He also stated that the alley next to the lot would never be used as a road, but the Kail’s couldn’t count it in their lot size, giving them a disadvantage. Kail stated that he could not reduce the size of his house without totally redesigning it. The alley is his only hardship. Mayor Peterson stated that he has a substandard lot with a larger house. Kail responded that his house is 1,999 s.f. without the garage. The garage brings the house to 2,856 s.f Murphy stated that the best solution would be to sell him the adjacent lot to the south. Bottenberg stated that the Planning Commission discussed the alley, and decided that the City would not be likely to vacate it. Barrett added that Kail therefore requires a variance. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10.2003 9. §02-2863 Richard KaUt 3753 Casco Avenue—Variances—Continued White stated that the lot slopes with a steep drop-off, and therefore the house can’t shift around at all. Kail stated that he paid $98,000 in cash for the lot and on his current budget will need to build the house himself Sansevere asked if Kail knew the variance would be denied and was okay with that, since the item had been put on the Consent Agenda. Bottenberg stated that he did. She suggested he redesign the house to get it under 1S% lot coverage and remove the need for a variance. Kail brought her a design without the porch roof, but the hardcover remained at 17.7% Sansevere asked Bottenberg if she could find a hardship for the applicant. She stated she could not, and neither could the Planning Commission. They want to be consistent in requiring new construction to be under 15% lot coverage. White stated that the vacant lot could not he developed because it is wetland, but if sold to the Kail’s, it would be cleaned up and give him the necessary lot size to keep his house as designed. Gappa stated the lots were tax forfeited years ago. Bottenberg stated that the Planning Commission only discussed vacating the alley, but not the lots. Gappa stated they could consider keeping easements in the alleyway. Nygard asked if adjacent land owners had first right of refusal when the City sells property. Gappa stated the alley was not of future value and the City could retain casements, but he hated to give up a lot because of the potential use for stormwater management. Bottenberg stated that if they vacated the alley, he would be at 15.3% lot cov erage, without the porch as a structure, or 66 s.f over the allowed. Gappa stated Kail would likely only get half the alley, and his neighbor would get the other half Bottenberg stated that with half the alley, he would be over his coverage by 254 s.f Kail suggested he could reduce the garage from a 3-stal! to a 2-stall. Bottenberg stated that with that reduction in the garage and half the alley, he would be within 15%. She stated that the alley couldn’t be vacated until it went t^fore the Planning Commission at the March meeting. . i J ii ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10,2003 9. U02-2863 Richard Kail, 3753 Casco Avenue —Variances —Continued Gappa stated the City would need an extension of the 60-day rule requirement. Kail said he would grant it. Mayor Peterson stated the City would not consider vacating the adjacent lot at this time because of the stormwater issue. She told Mr. Kail to work with Bottenberg on the numbers. White moved, and Murphy seconded, to table Item 9. Vote; Ayes 5, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Sansevere stated that the City of Plymouth mandates establishments card anyone who appears to be under 40 and suggested Orono do the same. Moorse stated it was a “best practice” policy that was encouraged, but could not be enforced with a penalty. Barrett stated that as such, there would be no problem implementing the practice in Orono. White asked about removal of hazardous old wood from playground equipment on public property. Gappa stated that he only knew of Bederwood Park needing things removed, Murphy asked if the problem was legitimate. Deb Halvorson, Park Commission member, indicated a recent newspaper article described the potential effects of the hazardous materials in the wooden playground equipment. Nygard stated that arsenic is released when people bum old wood items like picnic tables. The only safe disposal was to bury the item in a clay soil, or to bum it at the Hennepin County waste facility, which has the ability to contain the pollutants. Nygard stated that he spoke to Mr. Weiss regarding his letter in the newspaper about Navarre Fire Service. Weiss was concerned that Orono wanted to move away from Mound regarding fire service. Nygard assured him that the City was happy with Mound’s ser\’ice, but needed the new station for other reasons. Mayor Peterson asked who would attend the Elected Official Conference in St. Louis Park at the end of February. Mayor Peterson, White, and Murphy expressed interest Moorse stated that the Long Lake Fire Department moved to their new station last Saturday. They held a nice ceremony with a parade of the trucks and gave ours of the new facility. They had a flag raising ceremony and a blessing of the station. 1 ORONO CITY COUNCII. MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10,2003 public; SERVICE DIRECTOR’S REPORT *10. Request for Final Payment —Hackberry Park Improvements Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to approve Request for Final Payment, Hackberry Park Playground Equipment Project to ODESA Construction, Inc. in the amount of $13,156.27. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *11. Purchase of Bobcat Skid Steer Loader Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to approve purchase of a Bobcat Skid Steer Loader with attachments from Lano Equipment, Chaska, Minnesota for $37,800 to be funded from the 2003 Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund Budget Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. il2. Navarre Fire Station Project Development Costs Gappa stated that wetland mitigation was recommended to be done on-site in order to facilitate approval by the MCWD in an expedient manner. He stated that the Navarre Fire Station project is on the MCWD agenda for February 27*\ with the Highway 12 and Dahlstrom issues. Bonestroo engineers were working on a new mitigation plan that shows 15,000 s.f. of new wetlands and uses Public Value Credits for the remaining 5,000 s.f. of wetland mitigation to be submitted to MCWD on February 11'**. Nygard asked about the installation of a helipad. Murphy stated it could not go on the station roof because of the required structural supports. White stated that there was a helipad for the water patrol in case of a boating disaster. Mayor Peterson stated they should find out where area helipads are. Moorse questioned how much space is required to land a helicopter. Wliite stated it would require 120 s.f. Moorse stated that the on-site mitigation of the wetlands would use a large amount of park area, but not the most desirable areas. The installation of a skating rink would depend on what sort of rink is desired—whether it would consist of a flooded area or a full size rink with hockey boards. White stated that the rink at Casco Point would be only 1 '/i blocks away from tlic fire station. He felt the new rink would result in a high investment and a low return. Murphy stated that the first priority is the permit from the MCWD for the fire station, but that they should remain open to the possibility of a skating rink later. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10,2003 12. Navarre Fire Station Project Development Costs —Continued Nygard moved, and Sansevere seconded, to approve completion of soil borings for the Navarre Fire Station site by STS Consultants, Maple Grove, Minnesota at a cost of $3,100 with approval of a budget adjustment for the Navarre Fire Station Construction Fund to reflect this expenditure. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Nygard moved, and Sansevere seconded, to approve completion of a wetland mitigation plan for the Navarre Fire Station site by Bonestroo Engineers, Roseville, Minnesota at a cost of $6,410 with approval of a budget adjustment for the Navarre Fire Station Construction Fund to reflect this expenditure. V'ote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT *13. Long Lake Fire Station Certificate of Substantial Completion Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to authorize the Cit>* Administrator to sign the Certificate of Substantial Completion on the Long Lake Fire Station. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *14. Change of Funding Source for the Change Order Number 4 Portion of Application and Certificate for Payment Number 9 for the Long Lake Fire Station Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to approve payment of the costs related to change Order Number 4, in the amount of $16,210, from the Sewer Fund, rather than from the Joint Fire Station Account, and to amend the Sewer Fund budget to reflect the expenditure. Vole: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *15. Lease with North Memorial Medical Center for Space for Ambulance Crew in the Long Lake Fire Station Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to authorize the Cit>’ Adminstrator to sign the lease to provide space for the North Memorial ambulance crew in the Long Lake Fire Department. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 8 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10,2003 *16. Establish 2003 Navarre Fire Station Capital Project Fund and Interfund Loan Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to establish the Navarre Fire Station Construction Fund, and authorize the transfer of $20,000 from the General Fund to the Navarre Fire Station Construction Fund for the payment of expenses incurred prior to the sale of bonds, at which time the loan will be repaid. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *17. Purchase of Unmarked Police Vehicle Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to approve trade-in of older model Acura for a newer used car, not to exceed $2,800, and to approve budget adjustment from forfeiture fund. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *18. 2003 Police Officer Contract Settiement Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to approve the proposed 2003 Police Officer contract settlement, reflecting a 3.0% pay adjustment, and increase in the City ’s cafeteria benefit plan contribution to $500.00 per month, and an increase to eight premium holidays. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *19. Automated Pawn System (APS) Service Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to approve acquisition of the Automated Pawn System at an initial cost of $500, and a recurring cost of $864/year. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT None. *20. LICENSES Kennel License 1. Carol Brooks 980 West Femdale Road 3.Colleen Jabbour 98S Tonkawa Road 2.Kevin Garnett 450 Orono Orchard Road South 4.Jayne Paasch 2150 Kenwood Way . 'f ■mm ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10,2003 m, LICENSES—ConHnued 5.David & LuAnn Runkle 2684 Casco Point Road Special Event 1. Applicant: Event: Location: Date: Time: Charles Cudd Company 2003 Parade of Homes—Spring Preview 1140 Garden Court February 15-March 23,2003, Thursdays through Sundays 12:00 noon - 6:00 p.m. 2.Applicant: Event: Location: Wells Fargo Bank—Wayzata Wells Fargo Half Marathon Begin: Wells Fargo Bank Wayzata. Lake Street to Femdatle Road to County Road 156 to Orono Orchard Road to Fox Street to Old Crystal Bay Road to County Road 51 to County Road 19 to Crystal Bay road to Northview Road to Lake Road to County Road 15 to Old Beach Road to County Road 19 to Beehrle Avenue to the Southwest LRT Trail to Water Street. Finish: Wells Fargo Bank Excelsior. Date: Time: May 4,2003 8:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. Tobacco License 1. James Anderst Narrows Saloon 3380 Shoreline Drive 3. 2.John O'Sullivan O’Sullivans 1 (Convenience Store) 2420 Shadywood Road John O’Sullivan O’Sullivans 11 (Convenience Store-Culvers) 3340 Shoreline Drive Timothy Ivory Spring Hill Golf Club 725 Sixth Avenue North Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to approve the above listed licenses. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *21. BILLS White moved, and Murphy seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10,2003 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Re-Opened Muiphy stated that Long Lake will move its City Offices to the new facilities on Thui^ay, with their first City Council meeting in the new building on Tuesday, February 18“*. He ^.uggested Mayor Peterson visit or send flowers from the Council to congratulate them. Mayor Peterson agreed. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:10 p.m. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara Peterson, Mayor * ___ C 3600 D 3200 E 2800 F 2400 G 2000 H III! I 800 K 400 Lp -1200 AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, FEBRUARY 24,20f ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MIN (•) Asterisk item arc considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by til under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items .ire j Public Packet - 'ocated on the counter near the sign in sheet. ROLL CALL CONSENT agenda I. Approvc/Amend COt t FEB 2 4 2003 CITY OF ORONO APPROVAL OF MINUTES • 2. Regular Council Meeting of February 10,2003 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Andrew McDermott PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - J. Marc Fritzler PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMIMSTR/\TOR’S REPORT #03-2872 Terry & Christy Morse, 2080 Spates Avenue - Variance - Rcsolutior #03-2866 Judy & David Zoschke, 2040 Shad>'wood Road - Variances - Rcsolu #03-2868 John E. Whitman, 1580 Sixth Avenue N. - Variance - R^olution #03-2873 City of Orono - Comp Plan Amendment (MUSA) MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR'S REPORT 7. Schedule an Assessment Hearing for North Arm Lane Paving Project 8. Renew Park Mowing Contract 9. Purchase Replacement Utility Truck 10. North Long Lake E. - Sewer Project 11. Bid Award • Equipment & Materials Bid 2003 12. West Femdale Road Bridge Replacement - Resolution CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 13. Payment of Maple Plain Fire Service Costs 14. WeCan Request for Support of CDBG Funding 15. Pay Request for Long Lake Fire Station 16. Purchase Three New Squad Cars 17. Bid Award for Equipment Certificates - Resolution 18. 2002/2003/2004 Police Sergeant Contract CITV ATTORNEY’S REPORT 19. LICENSES Kennel Licei v Renewals Special Event • 20. BILLS UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 2003 03/03 - Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p.m. 03/10 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 03/17 • Planning Commission, 6:30 p.m. • - r>/» .. r. Application Deadline: 1/24/03 60 Day Deadline: 3/25/03 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: Name: Jennifer Chaput Title: City Planner COi FEB 2 4 2003 CITY OF ORONO DATE: Fcbniai>'20.2003 ITEM NO. 3 Agenda Section; /Zoning Item Description:#03-2872 Terry and Christy Morse 2080 Spates Avenue Variance Exhibits: A Resolution B Staff Report and exhibits of 2/19/03 Pertinent Code Sections: 1. Section 10.23, Subd. 6 (B): Lot area, width and setbacks; The following minimum requirements shall be observed in the LR-IA One Family Lakeshore Residential District; side yard adjacent to street setback of 50 feet. Application Summary: The applicants request a variance to add a second story for closet space on the most southwesterly portion of the existing principal structure, 20.6" from the side lot line adjacent to a street where 50 ’is required. PLANNING COMMISSION: Planning Commission recommended by a 6 to 0 vote to: Approve application as presented with the following condition: I) application for combination of lots 1.2, and 3 with the existing homestead (lots 4.5. and 21) be made prior to issuance of a building pemiit. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1 o approve the enclo.sed resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed re.solution. ■i A R'^SOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE NO. 03-2872 WHEREAS, Terry and Christy Morse, husband and wife, (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 2080 Spates Avenue, within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lots 1 ,2,3,4,S and 21, Ora Park on Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereinafter “the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance from Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to add a second story on the most southwesterly portion of the existing principal structure, 20.6' from the side street lot line where 50'is required, in the LR-1 A zoning district; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 19, 2003, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1 . This application was reviewed as Zoning File #03-2872. 2.The property is located in the LR-1A Zoning District, where 2 acres is the minimum required lot area. The property consists of approximately 1.16 acres. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 19, 2003 and recommended approval by a vote of 6 to 0. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: Page I of 5 ! A. The structure within the 50' setback has been in existence since 1971; B. The proposed addition does not increase the footprint of the existing building nor further encroach into the SO' setback; C. Although Railroad Avenue is a platted street, it is not in use as a street at this point. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is neccssaiy to prcser\ e a substantial property right of the applicants; and w ould be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application, including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to add a second stor>' on the most southwesterly portion of the existing principal structure, 20.6' from the side street lot line where 50'is required. Approval is subject to the following conditions: I.Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicant as attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the plans may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2.Approval is subject to the following condition: a) application for combination of lots 1,2, and 3 with the existing homestead (lots 4, 5, and 21) must be made prior to issuance of a building permit. Page 2 of 5 3.Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or these variances will expire on that date (February 24,2(X)4). 4.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 24th day of February, 2003. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner (s) Page 3 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24th day of February, 2003 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of February, 2003 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of ,2003,personally appeared before me, ____ who is personally known to me ____whose identity 1 proved on the basis of whose identity 1 proved on the oath/affirmation of credible witness ..a and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notaiy Public Page 4 of S I STATE OF MINNESO FA COUT4TY OF HENNEPIN On this __day of appeared before me, .2003,personally vdio is personally known to me whose identity 1 proved on the basis of \idiose identity 1 proved on the oath/aflirmation of credible witness ..a and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public Pages ofS > / TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Jennifer Chaput, City Planner DATE:February 3,2003 SUBJECT:#03-2872 Terry & Christy Morse 2080 Spates Avenue Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-1A One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 acres) 1.16 acres (50,472 s.f.) Exhibits: A Analysis Worksheet Application Survey Addition Plan Plat Map Location Map Property Owner’s List Permit Record Photos of Property B C D E F G H 1 Pertinent Code Sections: I. Section 10.23, Subd. 6 (B): Lot area, width and setbacks: The following minimum requirements shall be observed in the LR-1 A One Family Lakeshore Residential District: side yard adjacent to street setback of 50 feet. Application Summary: The applicants request a variance to add a second stoiy for closet space on the most southwesterly portion of the existing principal structure, 20.6* from the side lot line adjacent to a street where 50’is required. The applicants submitted an application for a building permit for interior/exterior renovations on their existing home. Staff realized that the request included an addition of second story living space within the substandard setback, requiring the applicant to go through the variance process. The property is located on the comer of two platted streets: Spates Avenue and Railroad Avenue, Although Railroad Avenue is not in use as a street at this point, the Zoning Ordinance requires »Oi-2S'^2 Terry & Christy Morse 2^I2-20VJ Page I of 3 / ■aaiai side yard setbacks of 50 ’ from both streets. The applicant is proposing the following renovations to the existing structure: 1) Change the structure of the roof above the “Great Room" (the most southwesterly part of the structure) to a higher pitch; and 2) Add a second floor area of 162.4 s.f. for two closets (above the northern portion of the “Great Room”). The existing structure dates back to 1910 and has had a number of renovations since that time. The part of the structure in question was added to the home in 1971 and is in need of repair. The contractor, JLM Design Build, has stated that foundation under this part of the home is 12 ” block and will support the addition. Proof of this information will be required at the time of building permit application. There are no zoning applications on file for this property. Hardship: The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit B. Issues for Consideration: 1. Railroad Avenue is a platted street but is not in use as a street. Should the structure be required to meet the same setback from Railroad Avenue as it does from Spates Avenue, an active street? 2. The proposed addition does not increase the footprint of the existing building or further encroach into the SO’ setback; 3. The structure within the 50 ’ setback has been in existence since 1971; 4. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of a variance to add a second story on the most southwesterly pottion of the existing principal structure, 20.6 ’ from the side lot line adjacent to a street where 50 ’is required. W3‘2872 Terrv A Christy Morse 2/13/2003 Page 2 of 3 ANALYSIS WORKSHEET LR-1A Zoning District Setbacks: m-2872 Terry A Christ}'Morse 2/12 2003 Pa^e 3 of 3 /V Setbacks Required Existing Proposed Front Yard 30’54’54’ No Change Rear Yard 30’222.6 ’222.6 ’ No Change Side Yard 10’58’58’ No Change Side Yard Street 30’20.6’20.6’ No Change 1/(2. Applkadon U Date Received"\J3^!^^ Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - VARI^NgE^PLICATION Initial Application Fee ^^(Too^ (SSO.OO per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee SI50.00 . . (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures S2S0.00 Afler-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION __ , ^ Site Address _______ _________ Property Identific^iori Number (P.I.D.) ^P •* ^ Attach legal description to arolication if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired •__________________________ I (do) <M»^otLj^ own the adjacent parcels of land. (month/year) Present use of property: V Zoning District: | p residential other (specify) APPLICANT Name Address: ‘“XOf^O Phone (home) __ Phone (work) ^ PirSi. Cilv: eA-aJP Zip: IY'()lg-<^- OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home). Phone (work)_ .\ddress:City..Zip: DESCRIPTION OF WEQUlgl^^,^^Estimated Construction Cost S (Pi\ I • Describe request in detail:CM u:i'n<\wl ap »pe. ■srBfP.-r < Retail luiiife fcnreafJT) (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Ix^etback: ___ Lot Width Front '’^^ide Hardcover Rear Lot Cover.' Average Lakesht Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual pi^erty conditionsicuity or unusual property conditions preyi enting (attach additional sheets if necess^) #23 'J .*■U . /& ‘Xta • • - m j: J REQUIRED SUB^^TTALS All of the following ioformatlon must be submitted bv the apnlication deadline date in order for vour appHcation to be considered complete! Completed Application Form __ Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150’, labels and; plat • niap (you must obtaurtHTs list, labeU and map-'frbift-^Hennepin' Cdunfy'Department of Finance, A-603;-Govt Center, 348-5910). —• 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and^include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8/j" x 11" for . reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/r x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8'/i" x 11"). ---- List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current o\vner(s). ---- As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. __ Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour variaPCe application i» not complete if the above information has not been Included. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) Md/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is tnjp^d correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature ^Date Owner’s Signature Date f/Z¥'/0 3 OWTS'ER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposespPt^vestigaiion and verification of this request L 'll Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Buildins & Zomr.z Office of this change prior to the meeting. 1 ) »' J • *•* ' * J / 1 *» f •J t> Terry D. Morse 2080 Spates Ave. Wayzata, MN SS391 To: Planning Commission Attn: Jennifer City ofOroDO 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN S53S6 Date: January 24,2003 RE: Variance Application/Hardship Statement Dear Jennifer, This home, the original homestead, was built in 1910. We purchased the property in 1980 after it had been on the market for a considerably long time. The home had holes in the original cedar shingle roof, which was able to welcome wind blown seeds, rain and sunshine...the result being plants growing in the attic and ceiling water damage. In addition, the main floor had about a 2" sag to the center of the house, and there was virtually no insulation in the walls. Over the years we have done considerable renovations and additions to not only make this property habitable, but also an attractive home site in Orono, while enhancing the character of the original farmhouse. The part of the home we desire to renovate and improve was added to the site in the mid 1970's. In as much, the room is 2X4 construction and insulated with minimal efficiency based on today's standard. This proposed project, while not tearing down the original structure, plans to address the following: * Improve the insulation efficiency * Add closet space to the small bedrooms on the second level Keep in context of original home (woodwork, roof pitch,...etc.) The proposed building project would not expand beyond the existing structure. Ahhough you may have never seen this section of "Railroad Ave", it is not an improved road. I have neighbors who say one property owner, who then lived in a home which is now accessed by Heritage Dr., used this section of Railroad Ave. to access his property until it was vacated (this section of Railroad Ave.) in the 1970's. In any case, in the 23 years we have resided here, the section of Railroad Ave. has never been touched by the blade of a snow plow. For these reasons, I don't understand the necessit}' of a setback variance because the structyrc7| within 50' of this "Side/Street". Sincerely, / / Terry D^orse (Phpjlo ’s Attached) - - S n \ .» ri.' *%.c i r T ’> 3*Wi U' 5i ' '' * ■. * i\«r' M ?/(2^ PfSim \ < — k _• '!■ . 'i-i 4| 'JgS^r:: it - . v" It^ 1C ^^Pv* •T V - ■ ~lk. hu'e, ^ r»!^ ^ /irlreJ^/ht. ^i^Vaswf-yt ilm^ i n ti - mmS' fi#r B> 6/\Z ^ \T •-■ •> •. r? jt vss-'n: Ff?•« • » »»•» •••• ••. "^ • ^ ••' .••-• * .* • • • * ___»— r . “I * «•• . * • • .. -*^t“ *-•"^3?^- >'*— «^ * ** , •------ . \)iex^ ^ UiotxJt IhC ^^. ^ Sf^ie^Aue. ^ \ j/ieej j— T^u, h%i4Me. ^ ^(rbAJ iH(. Mike Us^en U^. -Z^ ji -fie <,wvaj<^^ il6ad- in fhJM-c •n n , , 'O b^>*^ iic^ i 'mef. tMY~ pU' ^ iUsfX) paf€^\^ 0 '3 Vl^fr* V # m? • ? " I ’H K\\ '^.'. •» .. < t' I J* •' ,.'l ■^.v _______ 'm ■fSS »* ./JBC-iri*:- “fi/hln>^A»C AC \}'ieo€j.-fr^-^ Iije^eci. OrdV> ‘ik'' ____ ,.Mlk ti- \ iWi ISis # ■ I ••• \‘/A l/U',- ^Xi :r>x /V'.’** A •.uL x . i ‘Ic • ’'■ • m 7 fij ?A'E>e/(^ I . '^V V I 'i' '1 • .<iv r. r mm 'M •• -f-. ••^'' •' ^il I r e-' ',5{- - .-<r. •. >> . -•v 1 •• . . 'i ’> *} ><*W1 W ' /5i- c i? ' ■-.. jt’ ■' §S*^!^rrv-ISO ■ r: '^5 X 5 V // . (apa ^^c! liKc Jti\/iA'ii^ ^J^S 2> ^J> ^ of . iir&itaitttfiaiMUiiMMfti irmiriifaiirii "■ --_ F’l! i. -1 1 4 1 Mftiy A db StiosoB 2040 Spates Avc. Wayata, MN SS391 January 23,2003 Planning Commission City ofOrono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 RE: Application for a variance @ 2080 Spates Ave. Dear Planning Commission, I am aware of the remodeling (building) project planned by Terry and Christy Morse, at 2080 Spates Ave. I have seen the project drawii^plan and believe this will be an attractive improvement to the property and to our neighbortiood. The Morse's have always strived to keep their propeity in excellent repair and q>pearancc. I have no issues with their remodeling plan, and would recommend the approval of the necessary variance(s). Sincerely, Mary Mtti Stinson b 10/(2. Michael J. Lasher 1360 Railroad Ave. Crystal Bay, MN 5S323 January 23,2003 I il •Planning Con City ofOrono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono.MN 55356 RE: Ai^Ucation for a variance @ 2080 Spates Ave. Dear Planning Coiranission, I am aware of the remodeling (building) i»oject planned by Terry and Christy Morse, at 2080 Spates Ave. I have seen the project drawings/plan and believe this will be an attractive in^rovement to the property and to our neighborhood. The Morse's have always strived to keep their property in excellent repair and appearance. I have no issues with their remodeling plan, and would recommend the approval of the necessary variance(s). Sincerely, Michael J. Lasher r r •J 1 •• «V w t •J ^ • % I r- .. t> I l/l'2' Marietta Andcnoa 20SS Spates Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 January 23,2003 Planning Cbmmission ChyofOrono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN SS3S6 RE: Application for a variance @2080 Spates Ave. Dear Planning Commissbn, I am aware of the remodeling (building) project planned by Teny and Christy Morse, at 2080 Spates Ave. I have seen the project drawings/plan and believe this will be an attractive in^rovement to the property and to our neighborhood. The Morse's have always strived to keep their property in excellent repair and appearance. I have no issues with their remodeling plan, and would recommend the approval of the necessary variance(s). Sincerely, Marietta H. Anderson * Js • c ' / S Mr. Art J. Tovningcaa 2060 Spates Avc. Ciystal Bay, MN 55323 Januaiy 23,2003 Planning Commission CityofOrono 2750 Kelley Parkway Qrono.MN SS3S6 * ! RE; Application for a variance @ 2080 Spates Ave. Dear Planning Commission, I am aware of the remodeling (building) project planned by Terry and Christy Morse, at 2080 Spates Ave. I have seen the project drawings/plan and believe this will be an attractive inq)rovement to the property and to our neighboiiiood. The Morse's have always strived to keep their property in excellent repair and appearance. I have no issues with their remodeling plan, and would recommend the approval of the necessary variance(s). Sincerely, ( Kt- Art J. Tourangeau ■t.: K J si V . 7 t lL OLOOL I V« w -f.'.•• * - —r. —-----• ••••• , .>».-• • •.« *» MEH SECOND STORf.. . :losets...match •■ SXIST1N6 ROO^ PirCH... .'• . Vi ;• • •*;, : •.' v.i*. >. •y I. NEM CABLE END SIDINC TOBE-SHAKERTOWN* SHAKE PANELS * . V .* • . • • •. • • • • • I ' -T •■ - - vj^ * • f’. \ • .-•• r» ;•. • '••*!• • •■ : I EXISTIHC FAMILY ROOM . } INALLSTO REMAIN AS IS I ON THE EXTERIOR 11 *;.•* ^ *. . *' ___2. J ' - ... ■ • •* ‘ if^ f* . . « ,• • , _ ’• .•*. / •. ’y . ’• ^ V V« •*<"/,V^.»>>vVvi:2 ^ •• ,m __________________L.;_______ • V ...........V- >..>•» .. .^ * « ; '"■■■ ■"■^E^?NlOR’;PERSPE<^pi?Eg^ /" ’■■■■■ ■■•' ■ v'■ ■ j: V. ,;v* Ulf ‘vW ?i •'■ - • • • V • ■/* • • • 7/ • • •• I V*. • • • • • • ■ •’ •* ■' • • • ■ j *•.* •<f. *• * •.••• •’.*•* I *'5 ■; *v* *• : .•.». y.:. V.'V • •■ .. . ' iC .Vvi. l’. •.-•.'V.‘ • • -7-- • • •■ • • j •>■/’••-•.'. •’■• J • *i* . ' • T.V .» Plfilliiiiilf o L * r Mil m '"••'fm , \ '■'i >V 't ■'iS t«5. • » I*! ........... Ml • . . •j M v\ * > ; . ^ ** V.it ’ I* •. • ' • * ‘ •*’ *•• * fy ■• ■ ■ •.................... ■■-■k y>' • ’ •' .*^ *M ' * • ■ »•• .•■*^***» •■ .• .. . . • *v -*• . • H ' .• » • • ^ •.V- .- • • • . , « . .• __________________________________________•««»««^,.- • . • •-, ■ • • * * ..*••.• . • ' • •• . •..* -V » I.*I*-'■ • . *. r ♦'<. •*•■*•. • • ; • *;• ■ • • • •• * • • 1" • ' •:• • *'•* I ^ • I • • j ! ^ OAK FRENCH DOORS I >/in;odscure6lass...\ '. • • ly,^ - -r • . : 5‘ TAO-L KWlt..,eiZOR TRUSS ABOVE. 1 1 . i 1I . • »• ____^ 1 1 • • •• »••1*^ 'I 1 1 i f t •• s •i i «'j j t 1 b ••• ••* 1 *1 O ••• 1 . ^ [ •»i « • • ••• , 1 1 X ; 1 . ?ex•• b-f • 4tcusoriyws , — £ j;i--------------------^---------------ff •. _ 1 s 9 . — .. 1^4 9^4* -----------------------------------------.:«P y«lO t/y •‘•J'41/2*'.. WX 24 FIXED INIDOtN ■>N/6RID IN THE VAULT. SECOND FLOOR PLAN ^\T5 <r i t** t •#r' -•wi——.4. i'» ^,1 r-' I- i| ,i:l .'-• .,-7 i. ^.' . : V:'?» *.., '.*• • \i '.i* *.w •t • "T~t~t rsr-^s^ 11-: n"r>?r I -f ^;r^7r:ir-::nr.Lvrr: ^ ,• 1 Jj “1 . * I I r i‘ •^lr:llr; t ■ r*<i< A > r . ^ -^ - .'*. r'i'- -L .» *V * • ■ c —rTTTT^ A w-V:; ;: A: * •*: -I. r*'/;* • .V • |ooMm*eiw MU fim MmO«AM>CiOtinf MOlMCtS « NiauMie TofMi 1HI Aoe&ncvo n«tf H IMOf tlACHi M l*AiMCAfMOCIItTM|1VOMAr¥IOU*‘ * ' / • ■. • V ;--^r ■■• -^;/-vv... ;.. v.:‘-' '* . • i .•*, • *. .‘.Vf7* //•. i> ' .-tv • A*? .* : •* ■ ‘ • /A;:’ A;- *•* . *;• *. . ;.«’ • »J '*•/'•• , «•. 7i * I •' •* ' * *••** '• ■ »i '**..•-•-•'f •**’• w*v «•;'. ____!_J . ——»*a«~-L- '•!•' '{■••?* -•'v.'*->. “1 ■ • '5. •.. ;Mwu£ifBc:i6^‘^ •• '■" •••■*■• ' *v.s, Vr 5.-J. i‘ .. •. . ^*'•,**. V. ^ . • ^. ^ .,, • •. # . • Jv» • . ^• • *••*•,:,/• :: ; .y. ' •' -.W *i v>;>v '-V; \;.i> V./ :*s •♦V. * I •*■ *4%' • %•! V •<•*.»»» • • . ..^11 IP tv»yr^. t TTisss»rtsBr^^ __, ________ df w%l» 1* »i* 'i I.N t lurrru^——: •i. •»v .tMitf Mi ^dnMr^ m: , f INTERIOR PERSPECtiVE &0BRT Rem, *' • v. -c - • • ' ; . • - Ji.yV-'N/x^y dpp^,TI\/P '• • • ■; '•'< •■ ■■ •• '• ’-•• • '••'•• '» •■•.- <5\ /• KOOV v#m* m» needed 29ye«r«ip9tfi artn^ldmeUh > . ’ #«.'*• MUIng>«pif i/rC5d$heMn§ *: ' .Hiui tngtwg#r»d tdstor IruMH 24^06. * * ‘ \rctdeA .. : • lB«4iB«nfc-»’^ ■ » > 4m»po(gy.B. •*.'! *• . •hMirock ! • iMAHaUrralKM* ‘..>; |h« hMted ptil« ;■ :a’ ..... t=:-:=r* r,*r » ' * * . •. *? ...1. . / H4ui(2)11 WawinbitHL /_ V^tidilingpbU : 2 ar. astg *a «;*v«.g . xjrxars\ • V . ••,... ,• • .•* .• ;»• • UtangtluduMislo r«m*i .Jkr 4U 2 K 4 tludt b 5 V 9f^ tsmu uMga«ni*H IniiMbn * InfuUBofi 4mn^y.B. 1/2* theflroek ^ . / « < i V f • .• . 11 V .1 1 /• F II V li - 3j:^r=:=:r.->rr.:jJ \ -rrc : ■ ■■ ■___I ______ • * • • r f 1 1 1 •. |il!"1 1 .> • 1 ■! ••; 1 4 |l f 'Jr £.*■ K*".'. I ' •■ ■ i V ii'Jt 1^=^HL-■ i':...iH (ULiiLiu '^yi =] U..,—»—>«,»♦» il I rl-:; i.*ir-.i -----^ 1 ------- ___n~rxa;iS n-fiC? ?7T>3V=K .Jl.L 1 N«u*11«2* O«kPl0er CMtollria^ lortmjlhiilt I ’ • • • . • .• • I• • •* . •* * • *. * •.. . , t'V.; interior SECTION 1/2"«V-0 ” . • »• . •• • • . i. .’V •. •• ■' * • • “*■. Hen nepin County Taxpayer Services Departmente^^^ .ti!• • a:* / "f £3 y ^ ■'—*•'C) \ p^rcJl Information Parcel ID 101172331009S Housa Numbar 2080 Straat Nama SPATES AVE •• ',.v- . • • - , V This is not»legany ncordtd map. H taprasanls a compHaition o! MotmaOdn and data horn City. County, and SWa toad auttKridas and othar sources. 'wi Sunrise Point Gideon Bay Solberg Point i ! I.U?d Bay C- c- t e: i liTic-am. kvv:^' / V RUN DATE tl/ES/fS iATtll 508 irCNNEPXN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR S8 10-117-25 11 0002 00058 ADDRESS UNASSX6NED HENNEPIN CO REGIONAL RR AUTH HENNEPIN CO REGIONAL RR AUTH 817 5TH ST N 8520 NINNEAPOLIS HN 55801 PROP ADOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/AODR 58 10-117-25 51 0079 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED TERRY D 8 CHRISTINE N HORSE TERRY D 8 CHRISTINE H HORSE 2080 SPATES AVE WAVZATA HN 55581 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 58 10-117-25 51 0088 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED TERRY D 8 CHRISTINE H HORSE TERRY D 8 CHRISriNE H HORSE 2080 SPATES AVE WAVZATA HN 55591 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 58 10-117-25 51 0090 02000 SPATES AVE HARRIET SPATES TOURAHGEAU HARRIET SPATES TORANGEAU 2000 SPATES AVE WAVZATA HN 55591 REPORT NO. PX855801 PACE 57 58 10-117-25 51 0007 01500 RAILROAD AVE HICHAEL J LASI«R HICHAEL J LASHER 1500 RAILROAD AVE CRYSTAL DAY HN 55525 58 10-117-25 51 0008 02055 SPATES AVE HARIETTA H ANDERSON ET AL HARIEUA H ANDERSON 2055 SPATES AVE WAVZATA HN 55591 38 10-117-25 51 0080 00058 ADDRESS UNASSXCNED TERRY D 8 CHRISTINE H HORSE TERRY D 8 CHRISTINE H HORSE 2080 SPATES AVE WAVZATA HN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0081 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED TERRY D 8 CHRISTINE H HORSE TERRY D 8 CHRISTINE H HORSE 2080 SPATES AVE WAVZATA HN 55591 58 10-117-25 31 0090 02080 SPATES AVE NARY A STINSON HARY A STINSON 2080 SPATES AVE WAVZATA HN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0095 02080 SPATES AVE T 8 C HORSE TERRY D HORSE 2080 SPATES AVE WAVZATA HN 55591 TOTAL BATCH 508 00010 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THD BEST OF NY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. Z r-*u u JtV U i/z. PERMIT RECORD Permit No.Date Type of Permit _____ ______ jSLiJhJI .BHOxnJiiL _____ ____^SSS^CRg-^RU— ______________________________ jLittiXQ---------------------------ricift»flUATe. _________________________ J^.U__________ s'saS' 520 S2n._____ Lid-^______ ____kz^Sz^______________^Pu^fe________ -------Lb.3L*_lf^.-------------------------DafifiJi_______ __________L4r2rM_______rP r.(VgfeL»___ -0.--2£:ir3 ’5>... tSfiC-_____ __________ _____^4^____ cS^o! 3-^4 lU-H ^1'J^I t!r, 9ii(i Vs^.? ___ _______________ JH7.8 ______ ______pJh / ^ V r* f.0 V:________________________ % V2=iX.rii.. 6-2-qq Assja:)___ ^o<r7-io 3 ^7- cz Plumb»n0 ♦ 3-pJctures Total Fee: Entered By: Date Received: I Permit#: CITY OF ORONO - BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION All Information must be submitted in fuU before plan review will be started. • {please print all information) THE APPLICANT IS: {circle one) OWNER OR fXTfjfgATTQn^ JOB SITE ADDRESS: ^ ZIP; NAME OF OWNER: ^nf AI^/tAe_ PHONE: (home) flvp ' / - (work) ZIP:MAILING ADDRESS: ^ CONTRACTOR: /J/J( _________PHONE: CONTACT PERSON: (y i t ' MOBILE/PAGER: MAILING ADDRESSr^/^^r^Wrjy CITY: f^iu^ ZIP: STATE LICENSE: # ^ ARCHTTECT/ENGINEER: MAILING ADDRESS:___ NAME: PHONE: CITY:________ REGISTRATION # ZIP: TYPE OF WORK: New Move Addition___ Accessory Structure Romodel/Alteration Land Alteration PROPOSED WORK {describe in detail): STORIES NO. OF BElEI^^MS: V SQ. FEET OF EACH FLOOR: GARAGE STALLS: ATT.DET. ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION VALUATION (excluding land): $ j I hereby apply for a building permit and I acknowledge that the information above is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City and with the Slate Building Code; that I understand this is mt a permit and work is not to start without a permit; and that the work will be in accordanc^i^diL^i^oved plan. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: DATE: NOTE! Parade of Homes evetus require^ serrate permit approval by Police Department and City Council 60 days prior to mejytnif Non-permitted events will not be allowed. i] X'/s O-h'5/O-oCrb V ? - /V/ \VW ■/;■fe •■ I -** ..Ai' I 1 Miew 1% w V -'v- ^ «>r. ^ ^ I I 'I ’\tM f^ 9P<"fie5 sT|2e^ ±3/5 'ti 1 I I™ ' i| • ^ Nf f V? W\mWmt L If F *\tS S ^ fif i/ i M \ ^ » .- * 8 S- s’ fm^'M//, ’• :^M . .4’iS .M i^'. ^ [ •Hi* ' ' h -^ 0S r*T I > 1rs!; I !fi:fn wi. J^I • $ UL ^lew mifiofo Avewuu fleo/A / Co^ ^ FEB 2 4 2003 Application Deadline: 1/28/03 60 Day Deadline: 3/29/03 CITY OF OHONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: Name: Jennifer Chaput Title: City Planner DATE: Fcbruaiy20,2003 ITEM NO. V Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#03-2866 Judy and David Zoschke 2040 Shady'^\'ood Road Variances Exhibits: A Resolution b Staff Report and exhibits of 2/19/03 Pertinent Code Sections: 1. Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (B) and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (C)(6): Average Lakeshore Setback: The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. 2. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L)(2/. Hardcover within 75’ to 250 ’: Between 75 feet and 250 feet of the OHWL there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. 3. Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C): Lot Coverage By Structure: For all lots of 0-1.99 acres in total area, the total combined footprint areas of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 15% of the lot area. Application Summary: T he applicant requests the following variances to replace an existing 507.6 s.f. (42.3 ’ x 12’) lakeside deck, enclosing 151 s.f as patio area: 1) Lot coverage by structure: 2.848 s.f. (16.3%) where 2,620 s.f. (15%) is permitted; 2) Hardcover within the 75’to 250’ lakeshore setback zone: 6,442 s.f. (5 7.08%) where 2.821.5 s.f. (25%) is permitted; 3) Average lakeshore setback: encroaching 21*. PL.ANMNG COMMISSION: Planning Commission recommended by a 6 to 0 vote to: Approve the requested variances with the following conditions: 1) 1.506 s.f of e.xisting landscape plastic hardcover must be removed on the property; and 2) in the 0-75’ hardcover zone, the 681 s.f concrete patio must be removed to reduce the hardcover from 1,341 s.f (24.86%) to 660 s.f (12.23%). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the enclosed resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution. __ A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 14(C); SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 (B); SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2; SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C)(6); AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L)(2) FILE NO. 03-2866 WHEREAS, Judy and David Zoschke, husband and wife, (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 2040 Shadywood Road, within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lot 6 and the Northwesterly half, front and rear, of Lot 7, “Gust S. Johnson ’s Addition”, Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 14(C); Section 10.22, Subdivision I (B); Section 10.22. Subdivision 2; and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C)(6) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L)(2) to replace an existing 507.6 s.f. lakeside deck, enclosing 151 s.f as patio area, with 2,848 s.f. (16.3%) of structure where 2,620 s.f. (15%) is permitted; 6,442 s.f (57.08%) of hardcover where 2,821.5 s.f (25%) is permitted in the 75 ’-250' hardcover zone; and a 21 ’ encroachment into the average lakeshore setback in the LR-IC zoning district; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 19, 2003, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #03-2866. 2. The property is located in the LR-IC Zoning District, where 0.5 acres is the Page 1 of6 1 3. 5. 6. (*T' ^ minimum required lot area. The property consists of approximately 0.4 acres. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 19, 2003 and rccomniended approval by a vote of 6 to 0. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. The deck has existed for many years in the location of the proposed deck; B. Replacement of the deck as it currently exists and enclosing a small area will not increase the lot coverage by structure, hardcover in the 75 ’-250' hardcover zone or change the average lakeshore setback; C. The deck will continue to provide a landing for two sliding glass doors located op the lakeside of the house; D. The neighbors' views of the lake are not greatly affected by the location of the deck or the proposed patio enclosure; E. There exists 1,506 s.f. of non-conforming plastic hardcover on the property ‘hat must be removed; and F. E,xcessive existing hardcover in the 0-75 ’ zone can be substantially reduced by removing a portion of the concrete patio near the lake. The City Council fnuls that the co;iditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances will not adversely affect trafTic conditions, light, air. nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or d'^iculty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be In keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application, including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the efl'cct of the propo.sed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the communitv. Page 2 of 6 1 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 14(C); Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B); Section 10.22, Subdivision 2; and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C)(6) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L)(2) to replace an existing 507.6 s.f. lakeside deck, enclosing 151 s.f as patio area, with 2,848 s.f. (16,3%) of structure where 2,620 s.f. (15%) is permitted; 6,442 s.f. (57.08%) of hardcover where 2,821.5 s.f. (25%) is permitted in the 75’-250 ’ hardcover zone; and a 21’ encroachment into the average lakeshore setback. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicant attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Any further amendments to the site plan may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. Approval is subject to the following: a) 1,506 s.f. of existing landscape plastic hardcover must be removed on the property; and b) in the 0-75’ hardcover zone, the 681 s.f. concrete patio must be removed to reduce the hardcover from 1,341 s.f. (24,86%) to 660 s.f. (12.23%). Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or these variances will expire on that date (February 24, 2004). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and oii behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Page 3 of 6 i Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 24th day of February, 2003. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner (s) Page 4 of 6 f \ ; i» 1 I STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24th day of February, 2003 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of February, 2003 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Miimesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of .,2003,.personally appeared before me, ____who is personally known to me ____ whose identity I proved on the basis of whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation of credible witness .,a and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 i STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this__day of appeared before me. ,2003,personally who is personally known to me whose identity 1 proved on the basis of whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation of credible witness ..a and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public m Page 6 of 6 r I CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR LEISURE ROOMS, INC. IN LOTS 6 AND 7. GUST S. JOHNSON' S ADDITION HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LAKE MINNETONKA CRYSTAL BAY t2t4 CONTOUR UC LCCAj OCSCPlPTlQN pf PRCMISCS t Lot 6 ond too NorihwoBitfly holf, Irool ond rtor, of Lot 7, "Cott S. Johnson' t Addition*** i ftftrrihd to -thf Nor tlmtster I y holf, front ond roor of Lot 7 IS o vQ9ut dtscriptioh in thot tho Nor thtoslor ly lino of Lot 7 it the iolits»«oro. O'* •^•^€honqin9 liro. Ihortforo. th# clitnt is odvisod Ihot it nnoy bo nocossory to judicioHy dotormmo tho Southoostor ly I mi jl tho obovo doscribod proporty. o : donotos iron morktr Boorinqs shown orf boscd upon on osstmtd dolun. n>is *urv«v intends to show tho boundoriot of the obovo described property, tho locol ion of On esi'lmq houSff, ond iho locotion of oil visible *’hordcovor** thoroon. It dots not purport to show ony other irrpro«omtnts or oneroochmonls. 02-JI7 •dtpeitM eGRONBERG Sc ASSOCIATES. INC. CON5ULTWO CNOWNSw LAND SUNVCYOPt. 9TC f\AM«flS 449 NMTN «UO« OlVt. LONG LAIC. Mi 9939« • IX-479-4l4t I vtrrrR'Rw tm «i«>o«i •*f Mietfit or K CO lOOfo m Mcr uefvwm mo i«*t I m • CU.V iCi«nso eoortit—H mo uoo M (*n m oc sue w iciciti* 7./V-MT M iCfROC |••20* •••I 7-24-OJ 01-317 TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Jennifer Chaput, City Planner DATE:January 31,2003 SUBJECT:#03*2866 Judy and David Zoschke 2040 Shadywood Road Variances -- Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IC One Family Lakeshore Residential District (0.5 acre) 0.4 acres (17,467 s.f.) Exhibits: A Analysis Worksheet Application Hardcover Calculations Sur\ey Deck Plan Average I^akeshore Map Plat Map Location Map Topography Map Property Owner’s List Permit Record Permit for 1993 2"*^ Story Addition Photos of the property Photos of the property by applicant (1993) D C D E F G II I J K L M N Pertinent Code Sections: 1. Section 10.22. Subd. 1 (B) and Section 10.56. Subd. 16 (C)(6): Average Lakeshore Setback; Tlie average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lukeward protrusions of the resilience buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. 2. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L)(2): Hardcover within 75 ’ to 250’: Between 75 feet and 250 feet of the OHWL there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. 3. Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C): Lot Coverage By Structure: For all lots of 0-1.99 acres in total area, the total combined footprint areas of all principal and accessory structiTvS shall not exceed 15% of the lot area. H0i-2iS66 Jiuh- and David Zoschke 2 20 2003 Page I of 3 Application Summary: The applicant requests the following variances to replace an existing 507.6 s.f. (42.3 ’ x 12 ’) lakeside deck, enclosing ISI s.f as patio area: 1) Lot coverage by structure: 2,848 s.f. (16.3%) where 2,620 s.f. (15%) is permitted; 2) Hardcover within the 75 ’to 250’ lakeshore setback zone: 6,442 s.f. (57.08%) where 2,821.5 s.f. (25%) is permitted; 3) Average lakeshore setback: encroaching 21 ’. In 1993, the applicants added a second story onto their home. The remodeling and expansion resulted in the removal of the roof of the existing deck as well as the original railing system. The building permit did not identify a new deck as part of the approval nor did it question the amount of structure or hardcover on the property at that time. It is the City’s policy that a second story may be added to a home w hen the foot print area of the building is not increasing, regardless of hardcover excesses. There have been no zoning applications on this property in the past. The applicants wish to replace the existing deck for safety reasons, due to the deterioration of the floor boards. The proposed patio enclosure does not increase the size of the existing deck but may impact the lake views of neighbors. The lot area .md lot width of this property are less than required by the zoning district. 1) Lot coverage by structure The existing amount of structure on the property exceeds the maximum permitted by 228 s.f. Structure on the property includes the house (with deck) and a shed in the rear yard. This application does not propose to increase or decrease the amount of structure on the property. The proposed deck will replace the existing deck within the same square footage. There is no building permit on file for the existing shed. A review of aerial photographs shows that the shed was in existence prior to 1970. At that time, a building permit may not have been required since the building code allows structure up to 1 20 s.f. to be built w ithout a permit (although the City has required permits for all such structures since 1996). To reduce the amount of structure on the lot and bring the property closer to conformity, the shed (128 s.f.) could be removed or relocated under the deck. The removal of the shed w ould reduce the amount of structure to 2,720 s.f. (15.57%). 2) Hardcover There is significant hardcover located within the 0-75’ and 75 ’-250’ hardcover zones, none of which has had building permit approval but has existed since before 1970 (as shown on aerial photographs). Even though the proposed deck replacement is located in the 75 ’-250’ hardcover zone, it has been the City’s practice to request removal of hardcover in the 0-75' zone when excesses exist. U03-2866 Jiuh' and David Zoschke 2/20/2003 Page 2 of 5 r 0-75’ Hardcover Zone: The City’s policy is to allow one 4’ wide stairway with landings, and retaining walls (via Ct JP/variance) within this zone. This property has both wood and stone retaining walls and two sets of stairways, vaiying from 4’ to 7 ’ in width, accessing the lake. Since there are two sets of steps to the lake, one set (49 s.f) could potentially be removed to reduce the total hardcover to 1,292 s.f (23.95%) from 1,341 s.f (24.86%). The retaining walls are necessaiy for the applicants’ use of the property. There is a significant amount of concrete patio and walkway (821 s.f) within this zone. In the future, if repair of the concrete patio and walkway become necessary, they should be removed. 75 ’-250 ’ Hardcover Zone: There is 3,621 s.f of hardcover in this zone beyond the 25% permitted. Although this is excessive, there arc few areas of hardcover that are unnecessary for the use of house as it exists today. Doors on either side of the home use the concrete walks for access; and the concrete steps and flat stones on either side of the home provide access to the back of the lot. Potential hardcover reduction in this zone could be accomplished through reduction of the driveway closest to the southern property line. If the drivew ay was reduced by 264 s.f (44’ X 6’), the hardcover would be reduced from 6,442 s.f (57.08%) to 6,178 s.f (54.74%). Additionally, if the shed (128 s.f) and patio blocks surrounding the shed (116 s.f) were removed in the future, the hardcover would be reduced from 6,178 s.f (54.74%) to 5,934 s.f (52.58%). I'xisting Landscape Areas with Plastic: There is a significant amount of rock on plastic throughout the property, which is considered non-conforming hardcover. All plastic and fabric must be removed on the property before a building permit will be issued. This includes: 70 s.f in the 0-75’ hardcover zone; 1,267 s.f in the 75*-250' hardcover zone; and 169 s.f in the 250'-500' hardcover zone. Since plastic is not a permitted form of hardcover, these numbers are not included in the total amount of hardcover reported for each zone. 3) Average Lakeshore Setback In 2002, a certificate of occupancy was issued for the adjacent new home at 2060 Shadywood Road. The new home was built farther back on the lot than the previous home, changing the average lakeshore setback of the applicant’s home. The property to the north, 2032 Shad>Avood Road, is closer to the applicant's property than the new home to the south. The proposed enclosed patio area is also located within their view of the la.ke. A letter is included in the packet from this neighbor, stating that their views w ill not be impacted by the 21 ’ encroachment due to the higher elevation of their home and the dense vegetation between the properties. H03-2866 Jvdy and Dtnid Zoschkj 2/20/2003 Page 3 of 5 \L^ Hardship: The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit B. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Issues for Consideration: 1. The deck has existed for many years in the location of the proposed deck; 2. Replacement of the deck as it currently exists and enclosing a small area will not increase the lot coverage by structure, hardcover in the 75 ’-250 ’ hardcover zone or change the average lakeshore setback; 3. A building oermit was issued in 1993 for a second story addition to the home without addressing hardcover or structure issues on the property since the addition did not expand the existing footprint. The deck was not included in the permit; 4. 1'he deck would continue to provide a landing for two sliding glass doors located on the lakeside of the house; 5. The neighbors' views of the lake are not greatly affected by the location of the deck or the proposed patio enclosure; 6. The plastic hardcover is not permitted by the City an>^vhere on the property; 7. It is the City’s practice to recommend removal of hardcover within the 0-75' zone wlien an application is under review; and 8. Other i.ssues raised by the Planning Commission. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the requested variances with the condition that 1,506 s.f. of plastic hardcover on the property be removed prior to building permit approval. If the Planning Commission concludes that the structural coverage should be reduced, the shed (128 s.f.) may be potentially removed, reducing the structural coverage from 2,848 s.f. (16.3%) to 2,72" (15.57%). If the Planning Commission concludes that hardcover should be removed on the property, the following may be potential removals: a) In the 0-75 ’ hardcover zone, the following could be considered: 1) The concrete steps on the north side of the “grass area” could potentially be removed to reduce the hardco\er from 1.341 s.f. (24.86 %) to 1.292 s.f (23.95%); and 2) In the future, if repair of the concrete patio and walkway (821 s.f.) become necessary, they should be removed, further reducing hardcover to 471 s.f (8.73%). b) In the 75 ‘-250 ' hardcover zone, the following could be considered. 1) Removing a portion of the driveway (264 s.f or 44 ’ x 6') closest to the southern property line, reducing hardcover from 6,442 s.f (57.08%) to 6,178 s.f 54.74%); and 2) If the shed (128 s.f) and patio blocks surrounding the shed (116 s.f) were removed in the future, the hardcover would be further reduced to 5,934 s.f (52.58%). t(03 ’2866 Juih’ and Da\iJ Zoschke 2.20/2003 Pujie 4 of 5 'f: J } i I ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Lot Area & Width: Hardcover Calculations: Lot Coverage By Structure: tt03-2Sd6 Jud)' and Ckn'id Zoschke 2/20/2003 Page 5 of 5 A LR-IC Required Actual Lot Area 43,560 s.f. (01 acre)0.4 acres (17,467 s.f.) Lot Width 100 ’75’ Distance from shoreline Total nrea in setback Allowed hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover 0-75 ’5,395 s.f None 1,341 s.f (24.86%) 1,341 s.f (24.86%) No Change 75-250 ’11,286 s.f 2,821.5 s.f (25%) 16,442 s.f (57.08%) 16,442 s.f (57.08%) No Change 250-500’786 s.f 235.8 s.f (30%) 192 s.f (24.42%) 192 s.f (24.42%) No Change Total Lot Area Allowed Lot Coverage Existing Lot Proposed Lot Coverage Coverage 17,467 s.f 2,620 s.f 2,848 s.f 2,848 s.f (15%)(16.3%)(16.3%) No Change ■/_, CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 (SSO.OO per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee SI50.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address AppUcation# 05 - Date Received / •f'7 -dS Amount Paid Qt) pQ lonod. ^oazi ification Number (P.l.P.)Property Identiflcation Number (P.I ________ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired_______________________________ I (do) ftio noia also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: V residential ___pother (specify). Zoning District: Lk I'-C^_____________ .(month/year) Name APPLICANT, . „ Dffifia 7^0 5cfin Address: Sin VO ^ HJOOd HA OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) ?5Ji- ___ Phone (work) 9i>S ~ ~ y ^ City: OnOkjd Address: Phone (home). Phone (work)_ City:Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 000 Describe request in detaih EKisflhK dtttx iook , Rt1 iUHc. finJC Sfpj Ki to t\p 10 sokfy cad^ . PJet kof tA Niklo riU dJcA ^ ' (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear X Lot Covera X Average Lakeshc Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: ______________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) M A O 6 rr \tciJ 'K'. ■ If 4^ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted bv the application deadline date in order for vour application to be considered complete; 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Completed ^plication Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center T48-5910). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8/2" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8*/2" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8'/2" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of appl cant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour variance application Is not complete If the above Information has not been included. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. DateApplicant's Signature /OWNER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agen Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s Signature Date ^ >.3 Applicant must have all siibnfitta'.s into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make anangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Oflice of this change prior to the meeting. Jrh '■.. ;•) ) . 1 MINNEAPOLIS lof'. T4- Li/iii. ^e.4- imuclt kaclc s*n e. 4~ketV Katat- is g*c4-r>\i^cL ou/-c A 4*<t ll S4*dac I li/iCiCA III (1^ ^fe- Pru/»\ 0urc. “D\t^ a\z6 r^Ui'etoc^ r>i.%^ /'cpn.'r' Anericaa College of Rheinatology P lft/1 <1 ktnit I <^U^pc.^4- ]4-. Iv/c Ocktlot^ a liOrti Ct\/e^ p.kit I Wc io me ! r\ r^.\t ex,sU . LA u'^ulJ 'Qpci' oP- </. X’r^ UJ^ kiiiz-c, ren7Ct/CfJ a S/^niA'CA^^ drkioL.^'f fle^hftr /jfi J^'lS~OX^ A/^c/ L/oilli'r%^ 4x /Ack, a4~ /s4~J>f C«?/n f/'<lc/~<;.4-. <.’*-i -p^i.s 4^ •pLt/'-j ’kff- f'C.cluet^ kr.^J Ceti'^ 0 / n Arthritis and Rheumatology Consultants, RA. Jean C GorT.ar. M D. JcxJy K Hafy^jve. M D Archioa'd A SJ^emp. M.D Paul H Waytz. M D Jeffrey L Wilson. D 0 Kurt F. Zirrmerman. fJ.D David C Zosenke. M.D., Ph D. A Clinic of Board Certified Rheumatologists V/a.ter H Dorman M D Phnne (612) 333-6245 FAX (612) 333-7976 Vernon W Berglyna. M 0. Phone (763)551-9.104 FAX (763)551-9406 Phore: (952)893-1959 FAX* (952)693-1954 December 15, 2002 A E^uLE.-Weinberger City Planning/Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 • I . .. . ^I on Y Or OnO.- RE:Repair of d^k at 2040 Shadywood Residence Dear Mti-iSTginberger: I am writing to request a building permit to repair my existing deck. My general contractor, Scott Cooper, has already reviewed the pljuis with voiL-Apparentlv there are some issues that need to be resolved. Some historical information is important here. When we bought the house in 1993, the whole 50 foot deck was enclosed with a roof and an extensive railing system. This was removed in order to remodel and expand the structure upward. We actually reduced the total building coverage by 350 square feet by removing a glassed in patio area and a sky port. Not unexpectedly, the deck floor (carpet and plywood) had deteriorated with its new exposure to the elements. It has been unsafe to walk on for the past year. I have to replace the total deck flooring. I need to replace the railing system and reroute the stairs to satisfy safety codes. I am requesting to re-enclose a small portion of the deck (12 feet) to protect us from the elements. No additional building coverage is in these repair plans. Several issues need to be discussed: 1 • Sight line restrictions: Because our home is on an excavated hill there never was any interference with the neighbors’ lake view with the old covered strucnire nor will there be with the repaired deck. My neighbors agree with this (see enclosed letters). Additionally my neighbors have a privacy fence between our properties and I have grown a dense arborvitae hedge also to block any view of the deck. 2. Lot coverage bv structure: By your calculations wc are over by 228 square feet. Note that we have never added a single square foot to this coverage with our remodeled structure and in fact reduced it by over 350 square feet (see paragraph one). This repair project does not add any covered structure square feet. Our original approved remodeling plans (1993) allow for another 108 feet of covered structure but this was never completed for lack of funds at the time. ’«£0 France Avenue Ee na, MN 55435 (953)693-1953 3030 Harbor Lara P!ymcu9i. 55447 (763)551-9404 805 Medica) Ar's BuilCin; Mirmeaooiis. MN 55-'-C2 (612) 333-6245 Page 2 3. hart^pvCT' This has always been a concern with this property, J have never added any hardcover and in fact have tried to reduce it. In 19941 took out 96 square feet of cement walk in the 0-75 foot zone and replaced it with flower gardens and lawn. In 1998 I re-configured our damaged asphalt driveway to reduce the hardcover by another 1,240 square feet. I am continuing to seek ways to reduce hardcover on this propert>'. In consideration for the above deck rebuilding project I am willing to remove the following; -over 400 square feet of cement patio in the 0-75 foot zone replacing it with lawa -the plastic under 650 square feet of graveled area on the north side of the house. Sony for this letter’s length but I want to set the record clear on these repair plans. My background training before medicine was in ecology. When we bought this property in 1993 it was not only an eyesore but also an ecological failure. With some money, but mainly just hard work, we have immensely improved its visual appearance and made it much more environmentally friendly. I would hope to avoid the additional time and expense of a variance application since this is just a repair project. We have already paid over 51,300 for the hardcover survey and had to hire a second contractor when the first one. Leisure Rooms, Inc., bailed out after meeting with you. Ag^ir , thanks for you consideration. I will call you soon to set up a meeting to discuss these plans further if you desire. Sincerely, *mdy and David ZoKhke DCZ/STS/lak Enclosures (letters) rT I i f Ir* . To Whom It May Concern: We have reviewed the Zoschke’s plans for repairing their deck and for adding a smaU covered porch We are m agreement with these plans. Because of the significant difference in elevation between the two houses as well as a privacy fence and an arborvitae hedge, there has been and will not be any interference with our view of the lake. [y. Sincerely, 505:2 . xr •:Vy- O 1/5 , ., 0 0 • 0 W •. • / SETBACK ZONE! (CIRCLE ONE) EXI^glO HARPCOVER IN ZONE Ltn|th , HARDCOVE^LC^LCULATION WORKSHEET CLE ONE) r0.7S^ 7S.1S0’ 2S0.S00*7S-2S0'2S0-S00'500-1000' • •••. 5"- 3g7t.f.x/.ni \r<9P ^ Width X 9^ 21x0.67=14^ X X B. Oarafe C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E Patio/Deck •«•••• • X X F. Landscape Underiain ByPtastio Or Fabric X X X O. Ocher TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE + B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE* A. House Ltfiglh X X X B. Oarage C. Driveway X X D« Sidewalk X X E Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X 0. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ _ _ ♦ B ML^ S F 'vwo «Enu»j| *»au5 >»MO S.F.- aaaosAS S.F. ©V RCWso.r. ST. S.F. S.F. COHCRCTE. S.F.-WAtlV<TC S.F.-CPHd.5TFP; m a A&l COHCgflt S.F. - PATIO S.F. • ffrj If! S.F. S.F. jyf xlOO - 'IFf: A ST. B ST. Widdi S B S.F. SF. ST. S.F. • • ST. S.P.- • ST. ST. S.F. S.F. B a S.F. ST. ST. ST. ST. -A ST. B % r< L'* idwayk r i- V. V / y-i*f^o2.C^t> i SETBACK ZONES (CIRCLE ONE) EXISTING HARDCOVER IN rONF A. House HARDCOVER CALCULATHHiVVORKSHEET 0-75'2S0-S00<500-1000' Ltfifth Width X X X ft B. Ovage • «» » • C. Driv*eway X X D. Sidewalk X X E Patio/Deck X X F. LandKape Underlain ByPlutie Or Fabric X X X 0. Othera'-31i4&£iZiLli2*'* x - TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A_ _ ___ _ _ + B X 100 PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE' A House _____________ X Ltfl|lh Width X X X B. Cange C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X 0. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE total property area in zone A ___________ + B X 100 S.F.-HGtr5 e 43 I7Am S.F.- _ r?aTit> nu>c S.F. Z24I Q FSr. OfflvgtKAy 74-7 £22 s.F.-coNc««TCwe • 10 H9.u$£ SF.-DE^< S.F.-PA'^'D f COV.• ST|r _________ S.F. waao ReMf S.F. B % ss. S.F. SJ. SI. SI. SI. S.F: S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SI. S.F. , S.F. S.F. S.F. A S.F. B K •Oo •». # J ACfgAtjT EXISTING hardcover IN ZONB A. House ____________ X 75-250'250-500:SOO-1000' Ltauh Width S.F. X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. B. Oartge C. Drivewiy S.F. X X 164 - _ BUtacTifi I J Ol?»v^cW4 D. Sidewilk X X E. Peiio/Deck S.F. S.F. • mmm # • • # F. Landscape Underlain ByPlutic Or Fabric S.F. S.F. • X X X m m op BCCKOMt SF. S.F. 0. Other S*'-43L.r.^g,»2: X ^'*-l?.4y.6?rig»P 2a TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ __ _ _ _ + B vVWO SETHtidi. g P ,\«4u.5/etfffc xlOO idA PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN 7.0NT. • A. House _________ X Lenfth Width X X X B. Oarage C. Driveway >•■••• * • X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X S.F. A S.F. B % ^40. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.P. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SF. S.F. 0. Other S.F. • t total hardcover IN ZONE total property area in ZONE A - B ^ XlOO S.F. A SF. B % 7 •? / - ^ e .w> ., !f * ,% % > • •* •••• .4 a » A IP\xk 7i'^ r h I. . r\V 0. ■.' m-m K., •■ i.7\^ ^** ■ -r t% ••• ik'*'^>rJ,. "r !«•'•, 1 Ci > U) Q^ Oa) CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR LEISURE ROOMS, INC. IN LOTS 6 AND 7. GUST S. JOHNSON'S ADDITION HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA LAKE MINNETONKA CRYSTAL BAY 929 4 CONTOIM L»€ i ^ LCCAL DESCPtPTiON pr PfftMiSCS : Lol 6 ond tht Nor ihvcster Iy hoM, Ironl ond r«or, of lol 7. "Cult S. Johnson* l Addilion*** NOTC The port of the description referring to **lhf No*thwcsterIy holf, front ond reor of Lot 7** it Q vogue description m thol the Northeosterly line of Lot 7 is the lokeshore on everchonging line Therefore, the client is oovised Ihot it moy be necessory to judiciolly detcrrvtme the Southeoster t y line of the obovt dticribtd property. 0 : denotes iron marker Beorings shown ore bosed upon on ossimed dotim. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the obove described property, the iocolion of on eai'lmg house, ond the locotion of oil visible **hordcover thereon. II does not purport to show ony other irt^rovements or encroochmenis. M<«C« MM 02-317 •mn mumtarn GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES. INC. COMULTf« OOCOUw fUtVCYONS. 9Tt PiMHOn 440 NOOTN WUOW QM, LONG LA«. 101 00390 •12-473-4141 I icicev crat#* nwt t*«t verror w«t aafaters •« «c e* laMa m omci » i«*f I am a Suk« iCCuMO aaeris e»ut i«Mia OM«ei mat at i««i • vc %un a wacta«4 ea acaeat mm 1*20^ a*H 7-24-02 lai icruK la __ mm «w 02-317 /•j •i Ei/EVA-ncws e 4! .•• 7/- . .. 'Ht- ■ Hennepin County Taxpayer Services pepartl^nt|;^^ ^ Ch /Tb 17- V, •• •' "Parcel Information ••/«** •• P«re«l ID 1711723310013 : Houm Numb«r 2040 8tra«t Nam« SHAOYWOOD RO This Is not»itgaMy nconitd map. ItnpnsartaacompaationofMonnaSoh tnd data from City, County, and Stata mad authontias and otttar aounaa. i I -H 200 II M ^Jf I *0'* Northr'jm c«U£SI Maxwell Bay '’a,!'. \- I* *" \ORONO s \. Arm Shad^ood Point DBERING ISLAND Fagerness Point t-DaOTnOMIr-t /'WiiA W *V» wavuemm Spring QS Cn>Stol Bch^,Pci» Bay \24CCI^v5' llu)^' w-i.'it »-Vi ^■nsnai'miK ISLAND -tak^ Howards Point .*, ^ •«'% i t'»\ 4?rj j \J ‘sJu r * If-^ V f J *4«w i! :-:,^'/A-i mm DATE Al/lT/iS iATCN SIS NCNNCrXN COUNTY PffOfEDTV INFOtNATION SYSTEM PROfEDTY ONNEDS LIST REPOffT NO. PIASS^n PACE SB POOP AOCMI OMNED NAME TANPAYED NANE/AODD 17 17-117-23 31 Mtl •37AA SUNSET DP DESTAUITANTS NO UNIT INC DESTAUtANTS NO LlNir INC 43tA DAEEP PD NINNETONKA HN 55343 17 17-117-23 31 6545 63761 SUNSET DP SPEEDNAY SUPEPANEPXCA UC SPEEDWAY SUPEPANEPXCA LLC C/0 PPOPEPTY TAX PECOPDS 534 SOUTH HAXN ST rXNDLAY ON 45046 30 17-117-23 31 6661 62666 SHADYWOOD PD P 0 PIPCNNEP t L N KIPCNNEP P 0 KXPCNNEP K L N KXPCHNEP 2666 SHADYWOOD PD WAYZATA HN 55341 PPOP ADDP OWNEP NAHE TAXPAYEP NAHE/ADDP 30 17-117-23 31 6662 62610 SHADYWOOD PD P W A C H KOZXCKY PICNAPD W KOZXCKY 2610 SHADYWOOD PD WAYZATA HN 55341 30 17-117-23 31 6611 62624 SHADYWOOD PD PAMELA J WXLLETTE PAN WXLLETTE 2624 SHADYWOOD PD OPONO MN 55341 30 17-117-23 31 6612 62632 SHADYWOOD PD JANES N OUPGESS JANES M OUPGESS 2632 SHADYWOOD PD WAYZATA NN 55341 PPOP ADDP OWNEP NANE TAXPAYEP NANE/ADDP 30 17-117-23 31 661S 62646 SHADYWOOD PD D I J ZOSCHKE DAVID 1 JUDY K ZOSCHKE 2646 SHADYWOOD PO WAYZATA NN 55341 30 17-117-23 31 6614 62650 SHADYmO PD JACOUELYlOMt/KELLY JACQUELYNN^MELLY 2650 SHADY)^>D WAYZATA MN 55341 30 17-117-23 31 6615 62604 SHADYWOOD PO J KLEIN 9^ N KELLY J M KLEIN/r-^ N KELLY 2650 SHADYWOOD PO WAYZATA MN 55341 7 PPOP ADOP OWNEP NANE TAXPAYEP NANE/ADDP 30 17-117-23 31 6610 62606 SHADYWOOD PD JOAN L CAPLSON JOAN L CAPLSON 2606 SHADYWOOD PO WAYZATA NN 55341 30 17-117-23 31 6652 62606 SHADYWOOD PD JACOUELYNN N KELLY JACQUELYNN N KELLY J N KLEIN 2650 SHADYWOOD PD WAYZATA MN 55341 TOTAL BATCH 513 66611 X CEPTIFY THAT THE FACTS PEPPESENTEO APE AN ACCUPATE AND TPUE PEPPESENTATION OF INFOPNATXON AS XT APPEAPS THXS DATE ON THE PECOPDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPAPTMENT Of PPOPEPTY TAXATION« TO THE BEST OF NY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE BY O /•• f*.M-YY* t kk.' H ** A . •! •Iy Permit No. /SSS" PERMIT RECORD Date • Tvpe of Perm^ _ 3-^96^/Z/?4 /5fc5 3-«39'63’/IfiOiTt W tini /0-/3 ^6 HOOu ;97y «■<<; i7 __ -S'7- 4JT (S’Vi o»9 P fcnCH 3Jsl lO lH 75" _ /0-/V79"H^icT^TC ■/w^s'.. '7-9-p 0-/S-9^>O.Mdti)K^ v576>///-JU-9 3 fU-A^ S8/L /o?/V-t?3 '^I5<l 7'/-^7 ■Pe 5 /y S' -- - - -L. CHECK OFF LIST FOR ISSOAKCB OF PERMITS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY M>DRB8S OR T.HCAT.* SMAOWtOOOi) PIP:_________________ ' _______ DESCRIPTION OF WORKt 'g.rjrfl -AJO d'f ZONING REVIEW BY» BUILDING REVIEW BYt - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - FEES TO BE CHARGED: DATE APPROVED: ^ DATE APPROVED: ^'0^3 Mlsc. Fees Calculated By: PERMIT Yes • No^ PLAN REVIEW Yes No. STATE SURCHARGE Yes_ INVESTIGATION FEE Yes, SAC Y®s Number of SAC Units _ _ SEWER CONNECTION WATER CONNECTION PARK FEE SITE INSPECTION OTHER (specify) ZONING CHECK LIST Zoning District: L^^tC._ _ _ _ _ Fire Department: Post Office: tAiAi^-^ryv School District: Lot Area: Width: AO<. Depth: *2S3«*1 Av< Survey Submitted: Yes K No_ _ Date of Survey: Sr-(T-*:3_ _ _ _ _ _ __ Proposed Setbaclcs: , Front (Lake): ±_ _ _ _ Right Side: (Q.l Rew (Street): f._ _ _ _ Left Side: M»j. <3^ Adjacent Structures: _ _ _ _ _ _ _Wetland: [A B01U}IN6 HBVIBH DBC* M: I :{•< V Basement 1st Floor 2nd Floor Garage £q Footage LIST CONSTROCTION TYPeP^S $. Per Sq Ftg X X X X X TOTAL qO Estimated Construction Values $ 6*7^000 Inspections Requireds Site ffOrk Requiring Separate Permits s ^Footing AFraming Insulation IPlumbing Mechanical Septic Grading/Filling Fire k Wall Board ^inal 7)TFireplace (Masonry) Hater Connection 'Sewer Connection Other ^(Mfg.) Lawn Irrigation Other t/Well (State Permit) ni Electrical (State Permit) rb»r!ks (in house): REVIBN BY OTHERS:DATE: Access: Existing 1 Mew By:Access Approval * Date__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _• _ _ _ __ __ _ REMARKS (TO BE NOTED ON PERMIT) t AVO <^F gV I^^0 0*7~ tA/ltA-lTf (yJ COT- i* • • L.-w^ 1-nrai -iiaiSl jSfib.fA ’lan i®■ ■ ^/:W'^’‘'’ V/ ■'‘V • V lleyev^ p.6J. p-»r iJffW JLKlX p^T* iMbVLATiiO _ ._•; ^ _\. __ _ _ _:'. y ! .••• .., |- «• .1.. ,, • «**..--*«--**l* •• / •- • • • *«•«.•• • •«* ■ f * ' •■*■ ■ •»•••.• 1^ . ,• • • «».•••• I • . *• S5SW5? • «» *-4 «fP «sp<^‘^ — ::_L 1! . .. »• •.* . — >■! im ir [ir—'I 4 ■•.•>% ...» .' *. . • V *. ' !- -- - T ■■ ■ I , ,- - - -y V— . ■ .. -I— ... ■■■ -^——. . . . .. ... * 11 I .- •.. . • i-/-- - - - wx-eevscx-mto^,wtw^ownoN . . . . . .- lyfiST VS^Of ^ V«p^ nlf a —Astb IftAVlUU •I Cru»is.T I — —— - ( '■IP'i! ._..=—=;t • *. XT® ^"i&»vrru felJO.vX"T«OtU I; * I I i! • t -». • r V3=‘ blh -wyy p.*m«r'iMc*a«»'ttT*.* *•" -4rf ,»aBsaRaRJ5S? CuDse wx-ee WXiOti ty»iST fBoor Vnf-y iitfatfMwvC Aftin* l^viMu En«)&7 Umtr^ ■VA.Ti^ r •. ■'■ -1 c< . ' ■' I ' / - - w-C . ^ ■ - Hr' , “•r'r,Tj••I 0 ^*j^m iarJt 2?E3L^ ¥ - — ^ Vt.' r > • \1 -- rnii 0lL£^t l'»/4 "Ti T vi'^w (:2.o4o s'^orMoc^ \>N i«* vit/'i \ ^Aua'NY W^SKt?^ SHCXK j O; O'^Zl^iUhV F€WAr 2-^P PU/;^ Kcma-J • J“4^* _; f - ^ 4.r ^ .<4^ ’ Id ur) I > UJi ^ ^ " '^' jwi'- \'. ■ Id i.‘ s ' '•. 'W . >. '•1^ !■,"‘*,.11 " • V- ^' ‘S ^ fu '-:.,Vi'-fei:l i » ’-'■ i-' ' '■- •.•;■>: v'C'Cc-Cl 1 %!4 •A • • • ^ ''ir % ■* . , n? y •« '■ V *‘,’ jr 'r-': \ « 1 C-’CC f, '1 Tn *w4..-- V * r c ► .•r r ' .- ■ \ A:"- .$ . >^T_l ./,-:K: . ’ - ;>»-. •T'fo»y'‘'':^ mw -4k ^ '■-<,»■.. .# X * ■ ■■i<Sl|^'' ' '’">MI|iWf ||i»»iiij ■ |i ? ■• • ►1' * ►• \, ^ ^WM'b v- \‘ /•« mru-.- ■4C< !<?<» - . iV^ .i? r'^1 W^sn ► «• f, '..: , --N N. ' c )^'- -C. l:-'l \^€: - * • »;■. N ^ - V //■ } r ' V,. fmrn : *.. I < - r««IV ‘ V .5>’V'/>- / '3 c> -5 1 . J^r'' "...>.'r--^ L'^ ^ <sp * ^ 1^1? ' K‘^^rrT4nTi'l^^ ■*'5^ 1 *'f . f5SS55f5^p:f B M'^MM •f ' . • • • 9 • * V V)- « t * »•*- ,♦ / <•* ‘ •^* I '* i»^: 1' n ‘ » •‘ -■ «’A’ *VT..- • A ■V' S.,:i IH ti-; ^ci‘.-iV. Si^.h-OYi^ccO'' ViSi'Vi \^V‘5 ' • v; , '‘’V-l . ' - ^ y h/>• * * - * <>' • y • •> * U'^ vsj CX- ■■ uxK^^ce- c‘ ' // V ;**%1 IJ_:Jd> HgIPI ■Hi^^ K IP?' '|v:'' m t."J ne?«i ji * *• H-r IT t.- ** K. f." ^'5Xi,.. ■. Uc?iA5e ^fciHCr s^^eeT W^T N2/5- r*;p • r-i r ^ ^ t •vv.”-H '^1 ^ r I ^ r rr ‘.?o^ f V ,»•• * ’ ’ ■ /i \* \ • »*.-%^! l^ftp.li iE . "■J4r<4i?^fU 1 1 ’' ’i^Ve$toe CP H"a)se i iu.- ^ r kv' . ''si'- Wfc 4 - N^’/S 1 \’r '"'I 'y »^ewovMioN %;‘4 K ;•' o?; If ^ M; • \ '•■' 't,vi- . I -1^ ..- . V ■- \ »l - *» tSl-*?I it*‘ ^[>? . . 4» _ -3 -'“‘aiiflOBBt*; naancM:ri ■• LAt^lPC ^rT,r-r' r. f f* •* ♦- ■♦• . fl ■ -1 S • . r I-* r ii i.r'^ A !i i:.i" : •• 'mMIi ♦ • \ \ \ ’TV .•» X i ^\, V \ '\ 'n. \ ’v •fi^M 5TbNES (50UT>V $ii^ppHeW\^) «• t;i‘ W&J.sift T^rjf^ •■> '^s^p Hb • ^ <P^;wy-- -' ■. ’ ‘\J^L '• X • H-. ■; ^ • s.. • ••. !■ '-^ ^ “-V.- v; 4-?*• * X V -;;,. ' 1 . •- l.^_h;!|_lfLl • i'^ *' ,'* . Ffmo co-^'i4A^eD,:e\/Ei2.-^cfva) V .1 I) ' I iii'- i !'>: \ ' X ^ V. \ \ - X fel'V'v \f\B) 1 ^.■>rrrvt Wi ‘1 i ^•** tot^) iM .'. :;»sri iiv'- \i '■v^'V '■^5; X IL) ■:) f 4 # Application Deadline: 1/27/03 60 Day Deadline: 3/28/03 ••'■rTtNQ FEB 2 4 2003 CITY OF ORONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: Name: Jennifer Chaput Title: City Planner DAD*: Febmao ’20,2003 ITEM NO. is Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:i/03-2868 John E. Whitman 1580 Sixth Ave. N Variances Exhibits: A B Resolution Staff Report and exhibits of 2/19/03 Pertinent Code Sections: 1. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56. Subd. 16(E)(1): Hardcover nithin 75*: No hardcover or impervious surface shall be placed, located or constructed within 75 feet of the Ordinary High Water Level of any lake or tributaiy. 2. Section 10.56. Subd. 16 (J)(2): Grading/filling of more than 10 cubic yards within 75’: Grading, filling or excavating of more than 10 cubic yards is prohibited within 75 ’ of the Ordinary High Water Level of public waters. 3.Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (J)(3): Driveways within 75*: Drivewa\s shall not be constructed within 75 ’ of the Ordinary High Water Level of public waters. Application Summary: The applicant requests variances to construct a 125 s.f. driveway and pad, located 50' south of the centerline of Long l,ake Creek where no hardcover is permitted, and grading, filling or excavating of more than 10 cubic yards within 75 ’ of the Creek, to serv e as the access to a future home. PLANNING COMMISSION: Planning Commission recommended by a 6 to 0 vote to: Approve application as pre.sented with the following conditions: 1. A 15” culvert must be located underneath the driveway pad; 2. A grading pennit application shall be made with the City for no more than the grading and filling necessary to construct a 25’ x 25’ driveway pad; 3. Erosion control measures should be installed, inspected and approved by the City prior to any construction activity; 4. fhe applicant is advised that future driveway construction within 75 ’ of the Creek will require additional future approvals. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To appro\ e the enclosed resolution, COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2; SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L)(l); SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (JK2); AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (JK3) FILE NO. 03-2868 WHEREAS, the Whitman Real Estate Partnership, (hereinatter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1580 Sixth Avenue N, within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Tract D, Registered Land Survey No. 1418, files of Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2; Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L)(l); Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (JX2) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (J)(3) to construct a 125 s.f driveway and pad, located 50’ south of the centerline of Long Lake Creek where no hardcover is permitted, and grading, filling or excavating of more than 10 cubic yards within 75’ of the Creek where none is permitted, to serve as the access to a future home in the RR-1B zoning district; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Platming Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 19,2003, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota; FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #03-2868. 2. ITte property is located in the RR-1B Zoning District, w here 2 acres is the minimum required lot area. The property consists of approximately 4.21 acres. Page 1 of 5 f r 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 19, 2003 and recommended approval by a vote of 6 to 0. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: 5. 6. A. The lot was created in 1976 and is permitted to have one access; B. The minimal amount of frontage on Tract E requires that the access be located close to the tributary on Sixth Avenue N; C. The safest location for access to the lot is as far away from Sixth Avenue N as possible; and D. The construction of the access will create minimal disruption of the land and should not negatively impact the tributary. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserv e a substantial property right of the applieants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City, The City Council has considered this application, including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2; Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (LX 1); Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (JX2) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (JK3) to construct a 125 s.f. driveway and pad, located 50' south of the centerline of Long Lake Creek where no hardcover is permitted, and grading, filling or excavating of more than 10 cubic yards within 75* of the Creek where none is permitted, to serve as the access to a future home. Approval is subject to the following Page 2 of 5 • } conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4 . 5. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicant attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. Approval is subject to the following: a) A 15 ” culvert must be located underneath the driveway pad; b) A grading permit application shall be made with the City for no more than the grading and filling necessary to construct a 25' x 25' driveway pad; c) Erosion control measures should be installed, inspected and approved by the City prior to any construction activity; d) The applicant is advised that future driveway construction within 75 ’ of the Creek will require additional future approvals. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or these variances will expire on that date (Februaiy 24,2004). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 24th day of I'cbruaiy, 2003. AITEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Ouiter (s) Page 3 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged hefof? me on this 24th day of February, 2003 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Manesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of February', 2003 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of ,2003, appeared before me, ____ who is personally knou'n to me ____whose identity I proved on the basis of j>ersonally whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation of, credible witness .-a and w ho executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that hc/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 I STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this__day of appeared before me, , 2003,j)ersonally A who is personally known to me whose identity I proved on the basis of whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation of. credible witness ..a and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public Pages of5 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JOHN WHITMAN OF TRACT D, R.L.S. NO. 1418 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LEGAL OESCRPTION OF PREMISES: Tfocl 0, Registered Lond Survey No. 1418, fBe* of Regittror of Titles. Hennepin County. Mirv>esoto This survey shows the boundaries of the above described property. It does not purport to show ony other improvements or ecKroochments. o Iron o^orker • Hennepin County right~of-woy monument Bearings shown ore bosed upon on ossumed dotien LOT AMUt nCLUOMO Oa ML lA SM.21^ ACMES Wvewey M • 12S4- Sa ft, - aS21l hvdcever 7S-280 sMSeeh nm -1140104-Sa FT. 2S0>50S mmock tene-4fMS4-Sa FT. _________________wiiMpwiliMlf MifTlricIiCSOilBSIG I iSSOCUTDl 0IC.I •< M I« « «|r M M Stray* Ikt ta» State ol MwMte "T?rr 1--100* WIUWWC IMUftW ■Mn-tMt lli>Nr I?7j5 OATC 1/24/03 f; JOB TO |tf« ^ 03-031 lO ^ TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Jennifer Chaput, City. Planner DATE:February 6,2003 SUBJECT:m3-2m John E. Whitman 1580 Sixth Avenue N Variance — Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: Exhibits: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential (2 acres) 4.21 acres (183,387 s.f.) A B D E F G H I Analysis Worksheet Application Correspondence from City staff Survey Subdivision Plat RLS 1418 & Resolution Plat Map Location Map Topography Map Property Owner’s List Pertinent Code Sections: 1. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L)(l): Hardcover within 75’: No hardcover or impervious surface shall be placed, located or constructed within 75 feet of the Ordinary High Water Level of any lake or tributary'. 2. Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (J)(2): Grading/filling of more than 10 cubic yards within 75’: Grading, filling or excavating of more than 10 cubic yards is prohibited within 75’ of the Ordinary High Water Level of public waters. 3. Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (J)(3): Driveways within 75’: Driveways shall not be constructed within 75’ of the Ordinary High Water Level of public waters. If no alternatives exist, such improvements are subject to the variance review procedure, taking into account the following: a) Such improvements shall be designed to take advantage of natural vegetation and topography to achieve maximum screening from view from public waters; b) All roads and parking areas shall be designed and constructed to minimize and control erosion to public waters. m-2868JohnE. Whitman 2,20/2003 Page I of 5 Application Summary: The applicant requests variances to construct a 125 s.f. driveway and pad, SO’ from Long Lake Creek (a tributary stream) where no hardcover within 75’ is permitted or grading, filling or excavating of more than 10 cubic yards is permitted, to serve as the access to a future home. The applicant proposes a driveway pad of 125 s.f., located 15’ south of the comer property stake on the north property line and 50’ from the centerline of Long Lake Creek. Approximately 20,120 s.f. of the lot is located within 75’ of tlie center line of Long Lake Creek. The proposed driveway pad constitutes 0.62% of hardcover where none is allowed. The driveway pad will require a 15’ culvert running beneath it, draining towards the creek. Creation of the driveway will require grading and filling of land, exceeding 10 cubic yards. At this time, the applicant has not determined the amount of land that will require grading or filling. The applicant expects that there will be minimal disturbance to the land, using existing earth to the west of the proposed driveway pad to fill. However, to create a 25’ x 25’ driveway pad. more than 10 cubic yards would be required. Discussion: The applicant is in the process of trying to sell the property and felt that he would have greater success if the potential buyers knew how the property could be accessed off of the existing driveway (Tract E), accessing Sixth Avenue N. The applicant has an easement over Tract E. permitting the construction of a driveway within it. The Public Works Director met with the applicant to detemiine the best location for a driveway, given the short amount of frontage on Tract E. It was determined that, given the short distance to Sixth Avenue N, the access should be located as far north as possible, no closer than 26’ south of the corner property stake on the north property line. For safety reasons, access to a property should not be created too close to an intersection. Also, since Sixth Avenue N does not ha\e a right turn lane at Tract E, traffic may be moving at higher speeds when turning, creating dangerous situations for other movements close to the intersection. The location of the driveway on the property (to a potential building site) can not be determined until the applicant has properly identified locations for primary and secondary septic sites on the property. It is presumed that the septic sites will be located in the southeast portion site, since this is the flattest area. Therefore, the likely location of a drivew ay would run along the tree line on the northern portion of the property, moving to the south the farther west it is located. Other Comments: City Engineer The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed plan and agrees to the proposed access placement to the property. Prior to construction, erosion control measures should be installed, inspected and approved by the City. (103-2868 John £. Whilman 2Q0/2003 Page 2 of S Hennepin Countv Transportation Planning Hennepin County has reviewed the proposal and supports the proposed location of the access to the property. The County states that there is a sight distance problem westbound on County Road 6 (Sixth Avenue N) so it is most desirable to have the access to the property located as far away from the County road as possible. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District The application has been reviewed by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. They note that an erosion control permit will be required and that a site plan showing contour elevation lines will be required as part of their submittal. Board of Managers Approval will be required before a permit is issued. History: The property in question was created in 1976 (Registered Land Survey #1418) as part of a five lot subdivision, accessed through a drivew'ay (Tract E). All of the lots have been developed to date, with the exception of 1580 Sixth Avenue N. The resolution of the subdivision docs not identify any development stipulations on the land. The subdivision allowed for Tract E to cross Long Lake Creek and did not identify any designated wetlands at that time. In 1994, the owners of the property to the north, 1570 Sixth Street N (Lot A), were granted variances and a CUP (Zoning File # 1881) to permit construction of a private driveway to cross a protected tributaiy' to access the back of the owners ’ property. The variances included: filling and grading within 26’ of the flood plain and wetland conservation area; grading and filling w ithin 75’ of a tributary; and placing hardcover w ithin 75’ of a tributary. The CUP w as granted for grading and filling in excess of 500 cubic yards in a shoreland district. Hardship: The applicant has included their statement of hardship in Exhibit B. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Issues for Consideration: 1 . The lot was created in 1976 and is permitted to have one access; 2. The minimal amount of frontage on Tract E requires that the access be located close to the tributary on Sixth Avenue N; 3. City staff have determined that the safest location for access to the lot is as far away from Sixth Avenue N as possible; 4. Driveways can not be located closer than 5' to any (side) lot line and grading may not occur w ithin this area; 5. The construction of the access will create minimal disruption of the land and should not negatively impact the tributary; 6. Testing has not been completed to date to determine the location of the primary and secondarv septic sites on *he property for when it develops. The location of the septic sites will affect where the driveway is located on the property in the future; 7. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. U0i-2H68 John E. Whitman 2/20200} Page 3 of 5 StafT Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of variances to construct a 125 s.f. driveway and pad, located 50 ’ south of the centerline of Long Lake Creek where no hardcover is permitted, and grading, filling or excavating of more than 10 cubic yards within 75 ’ of the Creek, to serve as the access to a future home, with the following conditions: 1. A 15’ culvert must be located underneath the driveway pad; A grading permit application shall be made with the City for no more than the grading and filling necessary to construct a 25’ x 25’ driveway pad; Erosion control measures should be installed, inspected and approved by the City prior to any construction activity; Application and approval of the appropriate permits from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District is required prior to City permit approval; and The applicant is advised that fiiture driveway construction within 75 ’ of the Creek will require additional future approvals. 2. 3. 4. 5. ^ i M3-2868 John E. Hhilman 2/20/2003 Page 4 of 5 ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Lot Area: RR-IB Required Actual Lot Area 2 acres (87,120 s.f.)4.21 acres (183,387 s.f.) Hardcover Calculations: Hardcover & Grading Setbacks: U03’2868John E. Whitman 2/mm Page 5 of i A Distance from tributary Total area in setback Allowed hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover 0-75’20,120 s.f.None None 125 s.f. (0.62%) Setback required from tributary Proposed setback 75’50’ CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) Application# Date Received If^/m Amount Paid PO PROPERTY INFORMATION . ^ Site Address J^SO Property Identification Nuinber fP.I.D.i >12^ //^ <33 "B OooC. Attach legal description to implication if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired /U ZT lifdoj fdo not) also own the adiacent narcels^f land '(do not) also own the adjacent parcels ^f land. Pr^nt use of property: ___presidential ____other (specifV) \/A 02f .(month/year) Zoning District: y APPLICANT ' / ,jL Name Address: ^ aJ OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) Name Phone (work) AddressT^ ^ ' 'citv! Phone (home) Tfra) Phone (work) _______ Zip: <7. Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ /O^n Describe request in detail: .. (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Setback:Front Side ^ Hardcover Rear Lot Covers Average Lakeshc Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code retirements: T~n//c^^/ A ^ nCr>:irU4/&j. eff CJy rZ^A K, /?/ c ^ ^ /-f 14tr\ i _ V * * (»n»ch aAAiti(attach additional sheets if necessary) o fy o -•v\)0 «■ r REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the followlpg information must be submitted bv the application deadline date in order for vour appHcatlon to be conildered complete: 1. 2. Completed Application Form Certified Proper^ Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you 3. must obtain this list, labels .^d map ^om Hemiepin County Department of !r“i48-5910). 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Finance, A-603, Govt Center^348-5910), Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and"^ include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 814" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 814" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 814" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this 'lication, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour variance applicati on Is not complete If the above information has not been includgd. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant ’s Signat Date OWTVER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of inve stigati on and verification of this request. Owner ’s Signature ^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 7 fr %•• ■ "■ * _ ^a rAcu-^ / t (XA/Ctf^ A/ Au^ /^^^/-) ^^f^^Kcri A> y9 /^CeA/^ /$-g^o P^c/? /^cr>r/Z / /^</' I # 4 mfm Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik& Associates Engineers & Architects Bonestroo, Bostne. Anderllk ond AiiociJttt. Ine. it iin Affirmative Action/Cquol Opporiuni ond employee Owned Principefs: 0»!o G Bonettfoo PC • M.rrvm L Sorv.'i*. PC • Glorvr B Cook. PC • Poberf G Schunicr^r. Pf • Jfrtry A Bourdon. PC • A PC Febniaiy 4,2003 Senior Consulienlir Robert W Roienr. PC • Joseph C Amlrrlifc;, PC • Ricn,<fd f Turner PC • Sus.tn M Eberlm CPA Aftociele Principetf Kr«th A Gordon, PC • Robrrt R Pfeiferfr PC • R.ch.ud W Covier PC • 0<«wd O Lotkot<«. PC • M»ch.«el T R.iufm.uin PC • Ted K Fieiri PC • Kennpth P AntJt rvon. PC • Vrffc R Roif; PC • D>rvfd A BoncitfOd, MBA • Sidney P Willi.vmon. PC . L S • Ayr>et M Rmg. MBA* All.m Rick Schmidt. PC • Thom,it W Petenon. PE • J.imei R M.ii.tnd PC • Milet B ienien PC • L Ph»tiip Gr.*vc( III. PE • D«rriei J Edgenon. PE • limjcl PE • JhomM A Syfko. PE • Sheidon J Johnson • D rie A Grove. PE • Thomas A Roovnar. PC • Robert J Uevery. PE Offices: St Paul. St Cloud. Rochester and Wiiimar. V_N • Miivv.iukce. Wl • Chic*igo. IL ^bsfte: v/ww bonestroo com Jennifer Chaput Planner City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 \ .* •-J r*% iV L'.' C.-.C. JO Re: IS80 6'*' Avenue North File No. 139-03-000 Plat No. 03-2868 Dear Jennifer We have reviewed the certificate of survey D/id proposed gravel driveway plan for the property located at 15*'<0 6* Avenue North. The plan proposer, to construct 625 square feet of gravel driveway access to the propeiiy from an existing private dnve. We .have the follo wing com.-nents with regards to engineering matters: The proposed driveway is shown as far away from C.R. 6 as possible making it the mos: desirable location from an engineering perspective. Erosion conUol measures should be installed, inspected and approved by the City prior to any consiiudion activity. Pious should be submitted to Minnehaha Creek Wateished District for their review and coirment. Plans should be submitted to Hennepin County for their review and comment regarding C.R. 6 right of way needs. If you have any questions please call mo at (651) 604-4863. Yours very truly. BONESTROO. ROSHNE. ANT)ERUK & ASSOCLATFS. INC. Tom Kellogg Cc: Greg Cuppa, City of Orono 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 5SII3 • 651-636*4600 • Fax: 65t-636-l3|il % r Ninehaha Creek Watershed District Improving Quality of Water, Quality of Life Esutblished in 1967 Mall: 18202 Minnetonka Blvd., Deephaven, MN 55391 Phone; (952) 471-0590 Fax:(952)471-0682 EmaB: adminO(njnnehahacreek.ofg Web Site: www.niinnehahacraek.org Board of Managera Pamela G.Btixl James Calkins Lance Fisher Monica Gross Scott Thomas Richard MiBer Robert Schroeder Memorandum Date: February 10,2003 To: Jennifer Chaput, City of Orono and John Whitman From: Renae Schubert. Minnehaha Creek Watersned District RE: Proposed construction of a driveway pad at 1580 Sixth Avenue N. We have received the plan and project description for the above mentioned location In Orono. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) concerns are as follows: • Erosion control: Permit is required for the disturbance or excavation of 5,000 square feet of soil or 50 cubic yards or soil. The site plan must show silt fence around the disturbed area at the bottom on down hill slopes • Wetland determination must be made o If there is wetland on the property, a permit will be required for wetland protection, a wetland delineation will be required, and wetland buffers will be required • Site plan showing contour elevation lines o A Permit is required for any fill below the elevation of 931.5‘ and will require mitigation • A $10.00 application fee is required Permits for wetland protection and floodplain impacts will require Board of Managers Approval. Additionally in this case, mailing labels from Hennepin County for all properties within 600' of your property are required for public notification of the meeting in which your permit will be heard. These applications typically require 30-45 days prior to permits being issued. Please submit the items listed above as soon as possible for District Review. Please mail your submittals and permit application to: Attn: District Technician Minnehaha Creek Wate''shed District 18202 Minnetonka Blvd. Deephaven MN, 55391 cm GITYof ORONO Municipal Offices Stmt Address: 27S0 Kelley Parkway Ofono, MN 5S3S6 Mailing Addreu: P.O. Box 66 CrysUI Bay. MN 55323-0066 Mr. John Whitman 1570 Sixth Avenue North Long Lake, MN 5S3S6 Re: 1580 Sixth Avenue North (County Road 6); AKA Tract D of RLS1418 Dear Mr. Whitman: ____ 0 . The purpose of this letter is to provide you with the information necessary to develop the property for single family use at 1580 Sixth Avenue North. 1. Ut AreaAVidth This lot is zoned RR-IB wth a minimum lot area of 2 acres and minimum lot width of 200 feet. The front of this lot, determined by the shortest lot width along a street, is located along the outlot private road, referred to as Tract E. Given this, it is possible that the minimum lot width may not be met when measured at the rear of the front setback line. However, this lot was created after the City adopted the current 2-acre zoning standards in early 1975 and, therefore, will not require a variance for the lot width or area. The area of the lot conforms with the minimum requirements of the district. 2. Building Standards The maximum height permitted for a single family home is 30 feet or 2 '/j stories. The setbacks for a principal structure, measured from the property lines, in the RR-IB district are as follows: Front Yard (from the private road): 50* Rear Yard (opposite the front): 50’ Side Yard (along County Road 6): 50’ Side Yard (abutting property to the north): 100’ from OHWL Long Lake Creek and 30' from the side lot line 3. Acce *)iy Structures Detacned garages are considered accessor)' structures and require different setbacks than the principal structure. Accessory structures are not permitted in front of the primary structure. Depending on where a proposed house is situated on this lot, a detached garage would need a variance if positioned in front of (east oO the house. For the other yards, the following setbacks apply: Tdcpbooc (f52) 24M600 • Fax (952) 249-4616 wwwxlotono.an.itt Rear Yard (opposite the front): 10 ’ Side Yard (along County Road 6): 50’ Side Yard (abutting property to the north): 100 ’ from OHWL Long Lake Creek 4. Creek Setbacks Long Lake Creek, classified as a Tributary Stream, runs along the north side of this lot. All land within 300’ of a Tributary Stream is subject to shoreland district requirements. On an ?*’ primary structure must be located a minimum of 100 feet from the OHWL 75- of OlfwL of " P*nnitted within 5. Septic Systems The septic system must be located at least 75 feet from the OHWL of Long Lake Creek 20 feet from any hardcover and at least 20 feet from a lot line. The site is required to have a pnmary and secondary septic site and their sizes will vary depending on the number of bM^ms m the proposed structure. Orono code requires that sites with a capability to serve a 5-bedroom home must be identified. It would be advantageous to test the site in advance for two potential septic locations. Consideration should be given to where the drivewav be located on the site before determining septic sites. ^can 6. Access »f <h« comer property OHWLnf f'O”' •!>' vari^ce applicaUon wjd™ re"JrTIn^TfoT!.^”an"“ must prove a phpical hardship of the land. In this case, the hardship could include the necessity of having access to the site from the private road and if the applicant chose to meet Ae required setbacks and relocate the driveway father to the south, safety would be property, do not hesitate to contact me at (952) 249-4600. ^ ^ Sincerelv, ^nnifer Chapiit Planner cc: 1 580 Si.xth Ave N Street File niamrlsiiiMii f RESOLUTION NO. 667 "A RESOUJllON ATPRO\'ING THE RnCISTCRED lAMD SURIT-Y #1418" KIIEREAS, the City of Orono is a ntmicipal corporation organized and existing under tlie lows of the State of Minnesota, and KWREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted sub division regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the citv; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision plat for Registered Land Survey #1418 by A1 Whitman; NOW, TlEREroRE, BE IT RE550LVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat for Registered Land Survey #jaia Hennepin County, Minnesota, conditioned on the existing park dedication fees being paid. This resolution will exnirc on Sentember 1, 1976, if the aforesaid subdivision palt had not been filed with the Hennepin Couity Register of Deeds. In tliat event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision approval. Dated this day of March 1976. Robert L. Searles, Mayor ATIEST: Clerk/Administrator STATE OF mNNTiSOTA CnUNTY OF lENNEPIN cm OF ORONO The undersigned duly qualified and acting City Clerk/Administrator of the City of Orono hereby certifies that attached hereto is a true and correct copy of the original Resolution passed by the City Gowcil of the City of Orono on February 25, 1976, approving the Registered Land Survey * P^at on file in the office of tlic City Clcrk/Adbninistrator, Citv of Orono. falter ir. ^jjenson Clerk/Administrator Dated this 9 th day of , 1976. (Seal) §^•Els s M O CO e 83 g fi-o isS M (5 II Thies L'akc DEER NIU RO SEE MAP 48 lyvAif . i'jiEDINA j 2600 DEER KILL 1200 e Dickeys Lake eoo mmo mental sanmima.tMsai omno mocu tai WAYZATA cttmtik r'CKEV KELLEY SUGAR- WOODS OR I ILYD WIST MOUSTRM DANIELS j Long Lake WOODHAVEN DR NARRINGTON CIR WEAR cm COPPER- VIEW DR ^ WATERTOWN m f£ U O ELM MAP 3 S ►- xl YEALWOOO ___ PL ORCHARD S^.A^60p^t GRAND AVE NEIS?!' f RIRRIDT CO, "0 0 tmoroughired ,.>lT OR *Y SOMERSET C0uif<^tSIOE e ^0^^ OECR^^i^ •. - Luon Line 400 DEVIN U LONGVIEW cm g^^vw*-- ABINGDON WAY COLIN Biking Oono Golf Course ^0*R<OCf,o ,r\ r• r^ •' ] r \ V / '1 J • J 9 j r“ h. j-■■ .’.^5^;%-. ,^'■>V :'^ -■;>.!<i -r y - ■ . • ■ H PROP ADOR TAXPAYER RAn/ADDR PK)P AODR TAXPAYER NAHB/ADDR PI»)P ADOR OMISk MAMR TAXPAYER MANE/AOCm PROP ADOR ONIfER NAMI TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR kfe. '■^1-. .A ■ 1 *Y'* tm HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 3* 2i Ut 23 32 0003 isTo sirm AVI n J I NKITNAN AON WITMAM JOHN I NHITIWM ISTO «TH AVS M LOHO UU(B m S53SC coNom • 30 3C 110 23 32 OOOS 1S40 SIXTH AVB N ARTHtm r SCNLOBOHH ARTHUR P 8CML0H0HH 1S«0 SIXTH AVB N bONO UUCB Ml SS3S6 CONDMN • 30 20 110 23 32 0000 1S40 SIXTH AVB N MHITMAH RBAL BSTATB RTRSHP ADAIR COUNTRY INN 00 GUID8R lA BBTHL8HBM KH 03S74 COMDMN • 30 20 110 23 32 0007 ISSO SIXTH AVB H P H OROHAY & C 8 OROHAY PHILIP H/CA88AHDRA 8 OROHAY ISSO SIXTH AVB N bOMO UUCB Ml SS3S0 OOlffiNM i 38 30 110 33 33 0032 1000 bONO UUCB BbVD CAROb J CAJAC08 CAROL JBAH CAJACOB 1600 LOHO bAXB BbVO bONO LAKB Ml 5S3S0 30 20 1.10 23 33 0033 1S2S SIXTH AVB H S B 0 S 0 H0RR180N SCOTT B 0 SHBRYL 0 HORRISON 153S OTH AVB N bONO LAKB HN S53S0 CONDHH I 30 27 110 23 41 0000 30 AD0RB88 UHASSiaiBO 8TATB OP HINHB80TA OHR RBAb BSTATB MQMT ATTM DBSBIB OURTIN SOO LAPAYBTTB RD ST PAUL Ml SS1S5 COHfiHH • 30 37 110 33 44 0009 16S0 NORTH PARK RD ARDBbb N HACK AROBbb N HACK 16S0 NORTH PAStM RD ORONO Ml S5356 CONDMI 0 30 27 110 23 44 0010 KOO NORTH PARH RD T A BBBRT A M B BBBRT THOMAS BBBRT 1600 NORTH FARM RD bONO LAKB HH SS3S6 CONDHH I ft 0 / 0m, I CERTIFY THAT THE PACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OP INFORMATION AS IT APPERARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DErARTMENT OF PROPHITY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF NY KNONLEDOE AND BELIRP DAn /-a/ 4/3 0 / REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION FEB 2 4 2003 CITY OF ORONO Date: February 20,2003 Item No.L. Department Approval:Administrator Approval: Name: Michael P. GafTron Title: Planning Director Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: Proposed MUSA Amendment, Old Long Lake Road List of Exhibits A - Memo and Exhibits of 2-13-03 B - Draft Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Form Pursuant to published legal notice the Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 19 and subsequently on a vote of 6-0 recommended approval of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Amendment ^1 to 2000-2020 CMP) to add properties in the Old Long Lake Road area to the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) per the attached Memo and Exhibits of 2-13-03. At the hearing, one member of the public, Anand Gopin.ith of 705 Old Long Lake Road, spoke to the amendment, questioning whether the City was intending to force connection to the sewer and whether all properties would be assessed, and regarding whether construction of the sewer w ould have a negative impact on the natural character of Old Long Lake Road. Staff responded that I) the Council has not suggested that this project would force the sewer on those who do not want it. and in fact has suggested to the property owner who requested it (Alistair Jacques) that he pay all costs of the project unless he can find additional neighbors w ho would like to be served and are willing to share in the cost. Because any pipe that would serve Jacques would have the potential to serv e others abutting Old Long Lake Road, staff has included those potential properties in the MUSA amendment to avoid future such amendments, but there is no conclusion ^and there will be future hearings) as to actual construction of the pipe, who it will serv e, and how the costs will be distributed; and 2) because the pipe is expected to be a directionally bored pressurized line, the extent of disruption to the road surface or vegetation on the shoulders will be minimal. The next step in the process is for the Council to conditionally approve the proposed amendment subject to Mclropolitan Council review and comment, and direct staff to submit th ' amendment to the Metropolitan Council. A draft amendment submittal form is attached for City Council review. .Also see the estimate provided by the City Engineer regarding costs. Estimated total cost to provide the pressure line is just over $41,000, with each owner incurring an additional grinder station and connection cost estimated at $6500-510,000 per connection. If. 2000-2020 CMP Amendment #1 (MUSA) February 20,2002 Page 2 Mr. Jacques indicated he would be out of the country for the Planning Commission hearing and may not be back for the Febmary 24 Council meeting, but he remains keenly interested in the process moving forward. We have not approached any neighbors to find their interest level in the sewer; however, we have been contacted by the owner of the first property on RuAim Road who is rebuilding. That project has approved septic sites but the owner is potentially interested in coimecting to the sewer instead of installing a septic system if the timing worics out. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the following motion: Moved by__, seconded by__, to conditionally approve 2000-2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Ul adding certain properties along Old Long Lake Road to the defined Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) subject to review and comment by the Metropolitan Council, and direct staff to submit the amendment to Metropolitan Council. Vote:___ayes,___nays. To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Smith and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Michael P. GafTron, Planning Director February 13,2003 #03-2873 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment - MUSA Boundary List of Exhibits PC, A - Notice of Public Hearing ' ^ B - Map: Existing MUSA & Proposed MUSA Additions ^ C - Memo and Exhibits of January 9,2003 D - City Engineer Preliminary Cost Estimate E - City Council Minutes 1-13-03 ,o Background The City Council has directed that staff proceed to make an application to Met Council for expansion of the MUSA (Metropolitan Urban Service Area) to include a small number of properties along Old Long Lake Road situated just west of the Wayzata Country Club, between the Luce Line Trail and the Wood Rill Scientific & Natural Area. The MUSA defines those portions of the Metro Area where development is allowed to occur with municipal sewer rather than with septic systems. The initial intent was to provide the potential to serve the vacant parcel at 645 Old Long Lake Road and developed parcels adjacent to it. The area proposed to be included in the MUSA has now been slightly expanded by staff to include those properties abutting Old Long Lake Road which could potentially connect to the sewer line if one is constructed. Please review the staff memo of January 9 for more information on the property at 645 Old Long Lake Road. Also review the January 13 Council minutes for a stnse of the Council’s direction Process The public hearing is the first step in the process for completing a Comprehensive Plan amendment to revise the MUS.^. Once Planning Commission has completed the Public Hearing end recommended approval, a Resolution will be presented to the City Council for conditional adoption of the amendment subject to Met Council approval. The proposed amendment will be submitted to the Met Council on their standard forms with supporting information, and also submitted to adjacent municipalities for comment. Once Met Council has approved the amendment, the City can formally adopt it by resolution. Aller the amendment takes effect, actual construction of sewers and the assessments for same are topics primarily dealt with by the Council with no further Planning Commission action required. Preliminary discussions with Met Council staff indicate because the area of the amendment is less than 40 acres, and because there are no impacts to metro systems, the amendment will likely be considered as minor and timely approval would be expected. #03-2873 MUSA Amendment January 13,2003 Page 2 Basis for Amendment The primary intent of the amendment is to solve current and potential future sewer issues for a handful of existing developed substandard lots. The four lots along the south side of Old Long Lake Road range from 1.0 to 1,9 acres in area. Those on the north side are generally more conforming to the 2-acre standard. The 2000-2020 Community Management Plan made significant expansions of the MUSA to include developed or developing areas of the 2-acre zone surrounding Orono’s lakes. The City (purposely) has not revised the zoning in most areas where sewer has been provided during the past quarter century, and retrofitting of rural neighborhoods with sewer has in most cases not resulted in greater densities of development than if sewer had not been provided. This is also the case with the current proposal. The nine properties included in the MUSA amendment area are shown in the following table: Properties for Inclusion in 2003 MUSA Amendment PINS #Address Status Lot Area 36-118-23 31 0007 (Not assigned)Mostly wetland, not buildable, remnant outlot from WakeHeld Farms Addition, owned by owner of 375 Wakefield Road 0.87 ac. 36-118-23 31 0010 220 Wakefield Road Conforming lot with confonning septic systems, abuts Old Long Lake Road 2.34 ac. 36-118-23 32 0002 250 RuAnn Road Substandard lot, existing residence, is being rebuilt, plans to build a new conforming septic system this year 1.51 ac. 36-118-23 32 0003 625 Old Long Lake Rd.Substandard lot with existing residence, septic system is non^compliant and must be replaced by 2010 1.05 ac. 36-118-23 32 0004 645 Old Long Lake Rd.Substandard lot, existing residence was demolished by owner in 2001 1.02 ac. 36-118-23 32 0006 705 Old Long Lake Rd.Existing residence on slightly substandard lot, septic system is conforming mound 1.96 ac. 36-1 i 8-23 32 0007 685 Old Long Lake Rd.Existing residence, slightly substandard lot, conforming mound septic system 1.87 ac. 36-118-23 32 0009 360 RuAnn Road Existing residence, conforming lot, septic system is conforming 3.6 ac (2+ ac dry) 36-118-23 32 0010 350 RuAnn Road Existing residence, conforming lot, septic system is conforming 4.0 ac (2+ ac dry) 18.2 Ac kWirila ] #03-2873 MUSA Amendment January 13,2003 Page 3 StafT RccommeBdation Review the proposed amendment to the MUSA boundary, and hold the public hearing on the proposed amenttoent. Please advise staff of any issues that should be addressed prior to the public hearing. Staff recommends rq[>proval of the proposed MUSA amendment Options for Action 1. 2. 3. 4. Recommend approval. Recommend denial, stating reasons. Table for further information. Other. A 2. wi-oi CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Ciystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone ^952) 249-4600 Fax (952)249-4616 NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Wednesday. Febmary 19,2003 beginning at 8:30 p.m., or sometime thereafter, to ^nsider application #03-2873, City of Orono, 2750 Kelley Parkway, for an amendment to the Orono Community Management Plan (Comprehensive Plan). The amendment is to expand the Metropolitan Urbw Senrice Area (MUSA) boundary to incorporate certain properties along Old Long Lake Road, identified by the following Property Identification Numbers: 36-118-23 310007 36:118-23 32 0006 36-118-23 32 0010 36-118-23 32 0003 36-118-23 32 0007 36-118-23 32 0009 36-118-23 32 0004 36-118-23 32 0002 36-118-23 31 0010 The intent of the amendment is to allow for the potential future connection of the existing homes on these parcels to be connected to municipal sewer. All persons wishing to be h^d shall be present. Written comments'are due by February 12, 2003. The plans may be reviewed at City oftices by appointment. For further information call City Hall at 952-249-4600. City of Orono By: Planning Commission Planner To be published the week of February 8,2003. Posted at:Orono City Offices Crystal Bay Post Office Long Lake Post Office Navarre Post Office Orono Proposed Musa Expansion .1_____i Proposed Musa Area Luce Line Trail 7 Existing Musa # Compliant Septic System A Non-Compliant Septic System February 13.2003 • •• (P •rnmdBu- .1 H-Tll ■ c REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: January 9,2003 Item No.: ^ Department Approval: Name: Michael P. GafTron Title: Planning Director Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: Sewer Extension Request - 645 Old Long Lake Road List of Exhibits A - Location Map B - MUSA Map and Possible MUSA Amendment C - Demolition Permit Issued February 2001 D - Septic Inspector Correspondence with Mr. Jacques In 2000 Alistair Jacques purchased the residence at 645 Old Long Lake Road for aproximatcly $250,000. This was an existing residence on a substandard 1 -acre lot in the RR-1B 2-acre zone. The residence was served by a nonconforming septic system which would have required replacement by 2010. In February 2001 Mr. Jacques and his contractor, John Thomas Homes, applied for and were issued a permit to demolish the existing residence. It was subsequently demolished In March 2001 Mr. Jacques discussed his plans for construction of a new residence on the property with City staff He was advised of the need for a lot area variance, and of the required 2-acre zoning standards. He subsequently filed a variance application for lot area and side setback variances for a proposed .‘-bedroom home. Misapplication was immediately deemed incomplete because it lacked septic system design infomiation. After hiring a septic site evaluator/designer, applicant learned that the site w ould not support a septic system to scr\ e the size house he intended and in fact would only support a primary standard system for a 3-bcdroom house, with the alternate site requinng a non-standard system type. His request for septic system approval for the new residence was rejected by the On-Site Septic Manager based on the inadequacy of the site to support standard primary and alternate systems for the proposed house. The variance application has never proceeded. Mr. Jacques has requested that the City offer solutions to his dilemma. Staff has reviewed the possible options for septic system use, including the idea of allowing a 3-bedroom house with a standard s> stcm and allowing the alternate system to be ‘non-standard’. The nsks to the City are that { Old Long Lake Road Sewer January 9,2003 Page 2 construction of a new residence on a substandard lot without proof of conforming septic system capability, could create a demand for sewer outside the MUSA should the primary system fail. Such a demand could be avoided by merely disallowing the variances. Staff has reviewed the po^^sibilities for extension of sewer to the property. Tne site is located approximately 1/4 mile west of the existing sewer line in Old Long Lake Road that serves Wayzata Country Club and the “Summit Station ” subdivision (see Exhibit B). A pressure system with individual grinder stations could potentially be provided to serve 645 Old Long Lake Road, with capacity to serve the one house immediately east and two homes immediately west of the Jacques site. This area is outside the MUSA, but near enough to the existing system to suggest a MUSA expansion might be reasonable. Metropolitan Council staff have indicated such a MUSA expansion would be considered as a minor amendment because it is less than 40 acres in area and would have no impact on metro systems. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Determine wheiuer Council is interested in having staff pursue the provision of municipal sewer to 4 properties on Old Long Lake Road. If so, direct staff to initiate a Comprehensive Plan amendment request to the Metropolitan Council, including holding a public hearing for that amendment, and provide Council with additional information regarding costs, assessments, neighborhood interest, etc. CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Partway - PO Box 66 PERMIT C Ciystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 (952) 249-4600 Pennit Number: Permit Type: Date Issued: P03S48 Demolition /-I 2/22/2001 SITE ADDRESS:645 Old Long Lake Rd WAYZATA.MN 55391 PID: 36-II8-23-32-0004 DESCRIPTION: Proposed Use: Pennit Class: Pennit Type: Residential Building Demolition Census Code 645 Pennit Sub-type(s): Demo - Principal Structure DETAILS: Approved per resolution #: Separate permits required: NOTIC^S/REMARKS: r<iundations.'all demo debris to be removed from ground &. disposed of offsite per PCA regulations. Wells mjstbeabondoned. Inspection before backfilling. FEE SUMMARY:Permit Fee:S 50.00 Valuation: S 0.00 State Surcharge Fee: $ 0.50 TOTAL FEE:S 50.50 APPLICANT:. / .OWNER:Jacques Alistair 2585 Old Beach Rd Wayzata,MN 55391 TJ^UN MR|IGN Y |STSJ»EM^I^^W^TO ROV EM ENTS SPECIF lED STATE OF MI A BUILDINOCODE REQUIREMENTS. luaiunAi'RSOfeDBVSIfiNAfiJM: ^ies: City, Applicant, Assessor, Finance Page! J Fob-14-01 09: HR Oohn Thomas Homos, Inc.612 471 0946 P.02 CfystalB«y.MN S5323 ___ ~KIAI.COWOTim« Qdici^ IiutnictUios 1. 2. 3. ;etc Oceopinqr^* owiay* WAMEt^M^J^* ^ Mulim Ai Phon*-_ ^ cown>AcioK'8^»M«->^:j It^*^ MriOng Addrwi:^2;^Ji2L. Demolition if plwned toy means of.disasicnibly ^jj^beavy etpupment Th. «««»«(.) complete 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Demol specific prior apF< Foundations AaU be compleldy .removed ftom me ground. a*n. -» b. «»P.«d, di.p«.* of dr «u » -»d«« «.«. -i ippUcable PCA requirement! Water Xnspectien re quired when all d^ h“ '>«“ removed, before bacVfilling. . I i U F’ab-X4-dl 09: IIP John Thomas Homos* Inc. eiZ 471 094S P.03 7.WhhinSwoildqgdmofaupcntnirturiteniavilrafliiilta^MeAMidiaiiiif <j||0 lilt ihd be left deao ud deir of tn dMi| «4th ny CKCiwiticMi filed with Mrth Itvil iMhh the idjaceot muod fllevtilon («n^ when ludi cnmdoa is to be used u put of e new bididifv end tudi new bdldmg U acxudhr Older constnieli^ The undtrriamd ownar dud end heebby dote iadedniiy and hold haanltfs tte Chy of OrooOi iti egerti^ tnployecs tod ewjdi* ftoa and aD ^i*^*»*, ca peo ie%indudimaitotnayftattaftih>stftieCi^,itiagcnti^enqdoyteaandasdyaaiidi^ out of or lewItiqB ftom tilt deoKddoD dasedbed benin as parfbfi^ by the property owna. Ml enployeeik agesu, sdicenmeioif or assigDS. fCHMir TYFE AND IZE CALCClAIIOIf SSO.OO • Vrindpal Stnieoire ___ S30.00 - Aooeiioiy Stiuciurt 1. Subtotal of above pcmitiequeatcd S 2. State Sureharpa I , • . ^ J. TOTAL PERMIT lEE (add Kon 1-2 tbovt) t toO The uodanipied Imeby qqdiei to ftM City of Orooo ibr Uniaaea of a Demofidoa Ptnalt. agrees to do all work in strict acemianea wifti dw ordiaaaces of Aa City and the f^uIadOBS of tte StaM of MtooeiotA and certifies that aD statamenb pMda on this applieatioa are ooeapleta, tnia tad ooffcoL APPUCANT S SIGNATC OWNER'S SIGNATCREi____ X. f - •--------s Date: I DMe: •'.//I * APPROVED BY;Date: 2 o> GITYor ORONO Moaklpil Ofll^ti StmtAMnu: 2750 Mlty PMkway Orono. MN S5356 P.O. Bm 60 Ciystal Bar, MN 55323^ September 6,2002 Alistair Jacques 2585 OLD BEACH RO ORONO MN 55391 Dear Mr. Jacques: This letter is regarding your request for approval for a septic system for 645 Old Long Lake Rd. Orono requires 2 standard septic sites for new houses on vacant lots. Due to the fact that your lot does not have a house on it, it falls into this requirement. The sqitic design that you turned in has a standard mound site but the secondary site is an "other system". It does not fit the standard requirement because it is situated on fill soil. Standard systems must be put in on original undisturbed soil. Since there are not two standard septic sites on this lot, I am rejectmg your application in regards to the septic system. You have the option of iq>pealing tH!« Ob i^ion to the Orono City Council. If you choose to appeal this decisioh you can call either myself after September 22,2002, or you can call Mike Gaffran with any questions before this date. Sincerely, OVv«:cc:n^7t<^^ Matt Bolterman On*Site Septic Manager Wipfcoet(tBl)26»WB9 • lu(9S2)34M5M iBMr Memo Bontstfoo Rdstnt Andtrlic4 Atfodates TO: Greg G«ppa FROM: Tom Kellogg (651) 604^3 DATE OF REPORT: January 16,2003 RE: Old Long Lake Road Sewer Extension Cost Estimate: Attached is an itemized cost estimate for the sanitary sewer extension to serve the four properties on Old Long Lake Road. The cost estimate is for all work necessary to construct a pressure sewer and provide curb stops to each of the four properties. Keep in mind that each home will require an individual grinder pump and connection between the home and the curb stop. This work is not included in the cost estimate and will need to be completed by a licensed plumber. In addition, e.Nisting septic systems will need to be abandoned in accordance with City regulations. Costs on past projects for the grinder pump, connection to the home and abandonment of the septic system have ranged between $6,500 and $10,000. These costs should be added to the cost estimate to give the property owners an indication of what their total costs might be. Please let me know if you need anything else or have any questions. gen—treo, Hotarw, And9rtlk md AttocMf, Inc. 2335 WNt Highway 36 f St Paul. MN SS113> Phone; 651-6364600 4 Fax; 651-636-1311 CITY OF ORONO Old Long Lake Road Sanitary Sowar Extension Preliminary Cost Estimate BRA File No. 139-03-127 Preliminary Cost Estimate ITEM UNIT EST. QUANTITY UNIT PRICE EST. COST r HOPE SDR 11. directional bore Sanitary service, incl. curb stop Flushing station connection Connect to existing manhole Seeding incl. topsoil, mulch, fert. Estimated Construction Cost *5% Contingencies LF EA EA EA AC 2000 4 1 1 0.5 $14.00 1,500.00 3.000. 00 1.000. 00 3,000.00 PraNminsiy Cost Estimatf (1-16-(^)j^ $28,000 6,000 3.000 1.000 1,500 $39,500 1,975 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JANUARY 13,2003 PAR^OMMISSION COMMENTS^HEROKEE ILSE, REPRESENTA Tiyk— Contitt\ed The Had^erry ball fields were handled in the fall and are finally done prp^erly thanks to City staff. Moorse stated had to leave to attei for Item 3 as his mem^ was sufficient in explaining the that^lthough Mr. Anderst had not yet arrived. Police »atten^wother meeting. Council decided Offipw Eri lis menw was sufficient in explainins the case; ce Officer Kurt Erickson r Erickson was not needed PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS None. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. ZONING ADMINISTRATjOR^S REPORT *5. #02-2753 Wesley ^rne, 2817 Casco Point Road^Plan Revisions—Refer to PlannipK Commission Murphy moved,^d Sansevere seconded, to re-open appli^ioo #02-2753 and refer it to the Planning^ommission for further consideration. Vote: Ayes d^Nays 0. *6. Adoplioo of Stormwater Management Plan—Resolution No. ^11 Mui^y moved, and Sansevere seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 49n^adopting the Ci^»f Orono Surface Water Management Plan. iAyes 4, Nays 0. 7. Consideration of Old Long Lake Road Sewer Request Gaffron stated that they were looking for direction from Council. Mr. Jacques bought a substandard lot with a bad septic system. He tore down the home and made the necessary applications for variances to rebuild, then found that there would be problems with getting septic onto the site. The system he could use, would not meet the needs of the size house he plans to build. His request for septic system approval for the new residence was ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JANUARY 13,2003 7. Consideration of Oid Long Lake Road Se}ver Request—Continued rejected based on the inadequacy of the site to support standard primary and alternate systems for the proposed house. Staff reviewed possible solutions and determined that the an extension of sewer to the property may be possible. A pressure system with individual grinder stations could serve 645 Old l^ng Lake Road with capacity to serve the one house east and two houses west of Jacques site. The area is outside MUSA, but near enough to the existing system to suggest a MUSA expansion would be reasonable. Metropolitan Council indicated such a MUSA expansion would be a minor amendment because it is less than 40 acres in area and would have no impact on metro systems. Staff had not yet looked at the cost or proposed the plan to neighbors. White stated it would be a minor amendment in order to protect the lake. Gaffron stated that the area is totally boxed in and could not grow any larger than the proposed project. Sansevere stated that Jacques would burden most of the cost since he requires the project. Jacques stated that he was aware of that and though he did not yet know the cost of the project, he had requested it be done to service his property. Moorse stated the item was exploratory to see if Council was interested in pursuing the plan. Mayor Peterson asked if the City incurred expenses doing a feasibility study, and then Jacques backed out, who would shoulder the cost of the study. Moorse stated they could come up with a ballparic figure without incurring any significant cost. If the cost seems reasonable, then they could pursue it further. Gaffron stated that they would contact the neighbors and post a public hearing date, but first would need to establish an estimate of cost. Murphy stated he was in favor of the plan. White moved, and Mayor Peterson seconded, to direct staff to initiate a Comprehensive Plan amendment request to the Metropolitan Council, including holding a public hearing for that amendment, and provide Council with additional information regarding costs, assessments, neighborhood interest, etc. to provide a sewer extension to 645 Old Long Lake Road. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Metropolitan Council Building communities that work Local Planning Handbook Information Summary for Comprehensive Pian Amendments Submit this completed form and the following information for each Comprehensive Plan Amendment: Color Map<t) that show the following (8.5x11 or 11x17); ■ Location of the proposed change(s). • Current land use, indicating area(s) affected by the amendment. ■ Proposed land use, indicating area(s) affected by the amendment. • Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS), if available. Staff report to planning commission or governing body, if applicable. Other relevant information related to the amendment and proposed development. This form can found on the Metropolitan Council's Planning and Technical Assistance website at http://www.metrocouncil.orQ/olanninQ/assistance/resources.htm. Paper Submission Mail seven (7) copies of this form and relevant material, described above, to: Referrals Coordinator Planning and Technical Assistance Unit Metropolitan Council Mears Park Centre 230 E. Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101-1634 Electronic Submission The Metropolitan Council accepts electronic submission of Plan Amendments, in place of the 7 paper copies. Council staff will acknowledge receipt of the electronic submission; however, the review process will not begin until the Council receives a paper copy of the materials. In submitting an amendment electronically, please complete one of the following procedures; Email Process • Notify the city's sector representative of the coming electronic submittal. • Mail one (1) paper copy of the plan amendment, this form, maps, staff report(s), and all other relevant material to the Referrals Coordinator at the above address. • Council's receipt of the paper copy serves as the official date that begins the initial 10-day review period • Email this form and all relevant material to the community's Sector Representative. An updated list of Sector Representatives, their phone numbers and email addresses may be found at http://www.metrocouncil.orQ/olannina/assistance/sectorreDs.htm. November I9.2002 CD or Disk Process Mail one (1) CD or 3 V» floppy disk and one (1) paper copy of the plan amendment, this form, maps, r,dff report and all other relevant material to the Referrals Coordinator at the above address. Text Change Only Plan Amendments For Plan Amendments that are limited to text changes may only require the information in the Community Profile and Background section (questions 1-5) of this form. Please talk with your Sector Representative before submitting any such Plan Amendnients. Council staff may request further Information if it is determined that there may be potential impacts to regional systems, forecasts or policies. An updated list of Sector Representatives, their phone numbers and email addresses may be found at http://www.metrocouncil.orQ/DlanninQ/assistance/sectorreDS.htm . Metropolitan Council Review Council Staff revie\^ the Information submitted on this form within 10 working days to determine if the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is sufTiciently complete for Council review. In the completeness review process. Council staff evaluates if suffident information has been provided to determine the level of impact the amendment may have on regional systems or polides. In the case of electronic submission, receipt of the paper copy serves as the official date that begins the initial 10-day review period. Once found complete for review, the Count:; nas 60 days to review and take action on the amendment, with the option for extending the review period an additional 60 days, if necessary, after providing you with proper notification. The Council ’s review of Plan Amendments focuses ’ on compliance with the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, conformance with Regional System Plans, consistency with the Regional Blueprint and Council policies, and compatibility with adjacent jurisdictions. Waiver of Certain Plan Amendment Reviews In 2000, the Metropolitan Council re-authorized Council staff to waive Council review of “minor* Plan Amendments when the staff review indicates they are in conformance with regional system plans, consistent with the Blueprint and compatible with the plans of adjacent communities. Waivers rngy be granted for land use changes, MUSA expansions and other amendments under the following conditions: In cases where; □ Land use and MUSA changes are 40 acres or less; a There is no substantial departure from system plans or system impacts; 'j There is consistency with other Council policies including housing and density; □ There is compatibility with plans of adjacent local government jurisdictions; a There are no possible cumulative impacts; □ There is no major local opposition; and □ There is a commitment by the jurisdiction to adequately address any outstanding Comprehensive Plan review issues. Contact your Sector Representative to determine if a waiver is appropriate. Your Sector Rep will also assist you in determining how much of this form to complete. An updated list of Sector Representatives, their phone numbers and email ad.'resses may be found at httD://www.metrocouncil.orQ/DlanninQ/assistance/sectorreDs.htm . Novembef 19. 2002 COMMUNITY PROFILE AND BACKGROUND 1 . Provide the following community information. Local Governmental Unit City of Orono____________ Contact Name Mike Oaffron Contact Title Address Planning Director Telephone Number P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, MN 35323 952-249-4622 FAX Number 952-249-4616 Email Address Date of Preparation nKiaffronflicl.oronojnn.ue February 20,2003 2. Identify type of amendment; (check all that apply) Land use change, describe:________________ MUSA Expansion, in acres; 18.2 acres Text Change, describe: Other, describe: 3. Provide a description of the amendment. Name of Amendment 2000*2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendment #1 • Old Long Lake ____________ Road MUSA________________________________________ Old Long Lake Road at Luce Line Trail. 1/2 mile North of U.S.T.H. 12 General Location Brief Description Inclusion of 8 existing developed single family residences within MUSA to allow connection to sewer as an option for future ___________________replacement of nonconforming septic systems______________ Affected area, in acres 18.2 acres 4. Indicate official local status of the plan amendment. (Check all that apply.) Date of Action, if applicableAction Acted upon by planning commission Approved by governing body, contingent upon Metropolitan Council review Considered, but not approved by governing body Other (please describe) 5. Indicate if adjacent communities and other jurisdictions have been notified (M.S. 473,858, Subd. 2.) (Select one of the follow options) Plan amendment was sent to: (List adjacent local governments, school districts and other jurisdictions and the date the copies were sent): City of Wayzata Plan amendment will not impact adjacent local governments, school districts and other jurisdictions, based on community's judgement and completion of this form. Novembef 19,2002 IMPACT ON LAND USE 6. Describe land use changes in acres, applicable to this amendment site, using the following tables and filling in the community's specific land use categories: X Not Applicable Land Use Designation - Residential Ind. Res. component of Mixed Use (fill in specific tend use categories) Ave. Density Pre Amendment Post Amendment Acres « Units Acres «UniU Land Use Designation - Non Residential Uses (fill in specific land use categories) She Acres • Pre Amendment She Acres - Pont Amendment 7. To show whether this plan amendment increases or decreases the community's household, population or employment forecasts, complete the applicable lines of the following table. NA City-wide Forecasts Pre Annendment City-wide Forecasts Post Amendment 2010 2020 2010 2020 Households X Population X Employment X CONFORMANCE WITH REGIONAL SYSTEMS Transportation Traffic 8. To show whether this plan amendment increases or decreases trip generation from the planned land use and transportation element of the community's comp>rehensive plan, complete the following table using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 6*^ Edition. Trip Generation for the Site Based on Pianned Land Use Pre Amendment Trip Generation for the Site Based on Pianned Land Use Post Amendment November 19.2002 Est. average daily traffic Est. peak hour traffic 9. Will these changes require improvements to the existing local and regional road network or interchanges, beyond what is in the community's current transportation plan? Not appli cable, no changes in trip generation No Yes, describe Improvements and who will pay for them: Access 10. If the site has direct access to a principal or “A* minor arterial, is location and spacing consistent with applicable County guidelines or MnDOT's Access Management Guidelines (http://www.oim.dot.state.mn.us/access/index.htmn ? Not applicable, no direct access to a principal or "A* minor arterial. No, explain: Yes, describe: Transit and Other Modes of Transportation 11. Will this amerKicnent enhance access to transit services, increase or decrease the demand for transit services or warrant the extension of new transit service? Not applicable, currently not served by transit nor warrant extension of services. No, will not affect transit. Yes, list existing routes, describe changes and identify proposed/necessary transit facility improvements (e.g. shelters, park and rides): 12. Does the plan amendment Include Traffic Demand Management (TDM) strategies or land use and urban design measures, if applicable? Not applicable No, explain Yes, describe (e.g. car and van pooling, flexible work hours, mixed land uses that discourage vehicle trips and promote walking, biking, ridesharing, and transit): 13. Does the plan amendment include pedestrian and bike access and facilities, including crosswalks, bridges, trails, sidewalks, and bike racks, if applicable? Not applicable No, why not: Yes. describe: Wastewater Treatment 14. What type of wastewater treatment will be utilized to serve the proposed development? Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS). Skip to 18. Privately Owned/Community Treatment System. Skip to 18, Municipal Treatment. Answer questions 14 arut then Skip to 18. November 19. 2002 X Regional Wastewater Treatment, complete questions 15-17. 15. To show whether this plan amendment increases or decreases wastewater flow from currently planned land use and sewer flow projections, complete the following table. Not Applicable, no changes In flow. Skip to 18 Total Community Flow Pro Amendment (mod) 0.662 Total Community Flow Post Amendment (mgd) 0.664 2010 0.853 0.855 2020 0.942 0.944 16. Identify interceptor(s) that will be impacted by these changes and indicate if flows will be diverted from one interceptor service area to another? Thia will flow to Orono'a “Wayzata Direct” newer connection (See Orono 2000*2020 CMP Page 4C-51) and will not divert flows from one interceptor to another. 17. Does the plan amendment include any wastewater flow to an adjacent community? (Note: for new intercommunity agreements, the receiving community must also amend the sewer element of its plan) Yes, enclose a copy of the lnter*community agreement (Wayzata/Orono) Aviation 18. Does the plan amendment affect any airport functions? Not applicable, site not within airport influence area or search area, Skip to 19 No, Skip to 19 Yes, describe relationship to airport safety/noise zones, land use compatibility or other possible impacts; Recreation Open Space 19. Does the amendment include, or is it adjacent to or within a mile of an existing or planned regional park, reserve or trail, as identified in the Regional Parks and Open Space System Plan (http://www.metrocouncil.orQ/DlanninQ/Darks/Darks.htm 1? Yes, describe potential impacts and mitigation plans: Properties to be included in MUSA are within 1/4 mile of WoodRill SNA (MnDNR). There will be no impacts to the SNA. 20. Does the amendment include land identified as a valued regional natural resource in the Regional Parks and Open Space System Plan or the Regional Natural Resources Inventory/Assessment (data is available on the MetroGIS map DataFinder website at http://www .datafinder.orq/catalou.asD . Click on ‘Preliminary Regionally Significant Natural Resource Areas' under the Biology and Ecology heading) Yes, identify resource and describe plans and proposed funding sources to protect it: November 19.2002 6 CONSISTENCY WITH COUNCIL POLICY Environmental Resources 21 . Will or has an environmental review (Environmental Assessment Worksheet, Environmental Impact Statement or Alternative Urban Areawide Review) be completed for the site (check all that apply)? If proposed amendment is put into effect, it would eliminate the need for a mandatory environmental review. No. none required Yes, indicate type of review and approximate date of completion and include a summary of findings, if completed:_________________________________________________ Surface Water Management 22. Does the plan amendment propose any impacts to wetlands located on the site? Not applicable, no wetlands on the site No impacts to wetlands located on the site Yes, describe the type of wetland, potential impacts and mitigation plans: 23. Will stormwater runoff generated from proposed development be treated on-site? The Council ’s website contains resources on stormwater management techniques at httD://www.metrocouncil.org/DlanninQ/assistance/resources.htm . Not applicable, no development proposed No, check one of the following and describe: Runoff will receive no treatment: Runoff will be treated off-site, identify off-site treatment facility: Yes, describe type and level of on-site pollutant removal treatment/mitigation plans: 24. Have conservation oriented design principles, such as rural clustering, low impact development (LID) storm water management techniques and/or native vegetation buffers and landscape design been incorporated into the plan amendment? Not Applicable No, explain: Yes. describe: Water Supply 25. Will the proposed plan amendment increase or decrease projected water use from the community's current water supply plan? Not Applicable No Increase or decrease in projected water use from water supply plan. Yes, provide water supply plan amendment to describe necessary facilities improvements or changes: Novemtjer 19.2002 MNRRA/CriOcat Ana Plan 26. Does the plan aniendment indude any land within the designated Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (MNRRA) and Critical Area boundaries? Not Applicable, not a comnHinity within MNRRA or CA boundaries. No, site is not within MNRRA or CA boundaries. Yes, describe how Critical Area guidelines and voluntary MNRRA Comprehensive Management Plan policies are being addressed. Housing 27. Complete the following table to show if the amendment changes the amount of land available for new medium and high density residential development or redevelopment through 2010 that could accomnxxiate affordable and lifecycle housing. X Not Applicable, no sewered residential land use changes, Skip to 28 Undeveloped Acres Pre amendment Undeveloped Acres Post Amendment Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Other Land Uses with Res.* Implementation 28. Will the p'an amendment require changes In zoning or subdivision ordinances. Capital lmproveme.?» Program (CIP), or other official controls? Yes, describe propcaed changes and timeline: NovAmtMr 19,2003 ■'1^ o - •v I • A-) SPUll imwrt IfHZIEASt IbU is asds bstwsm ths City «f VsysAU sm4 tlia Citj •! Oto«o« tw coatifustts iacorporstad aiiaieipslitiss loeatsd ia C&t Cfyaij at ITwipti, Stau aC MiBBatatif sad VHHCAS» Vsyssts omis sad opsrstss a ssaltsry aaasr systaa for tho oso af Ha rosIdsaCit sad VHEttASf Oraaa has ao aidi fsailitiss avsilsblo far its rasidaats ia aa araa of Oraaa aaar isjssta dsscrlbsd as fallawai that part af tha Narthaast <>iartsr af tha Sauthaast Qusrtar sad tha tauthaast <^l«rt•r •( Ch« Southwast ^vur «r Stctlea M» Totmihtp ill, Kaa|« S3, d«Mtlb«4 •• l«|lMilM «e • poUt U« btt llM •( mU fowtb«««c quaruv 4lte«at 37 (««t Southwlp of •• Mamnd ae rlahc anglaa (ran tha eaaur ttM af tha Mia ttact at tha MlaBaapalla ladaatalai Katlaap Caapaap aa aaa lacatal aatf attabllthadt thaaca Saath alaap aaU laat tlaa ta a palat dtataat 313.0 (tat Saatfi af tha Marthaaat cacaar af aal4 faaihaaat Quartar af tha laathaaat (Mareari thaaca Saath 19 dapraaa 40 alautaa Waat a dlatMca af 13I.QS faatl thaaca Saath 27 dapraaa 40 alautac Haac ta tha caatar llaa af tha Saath Utaaaapatta aad Vaurtaaa Baad, alao callad tha Uaycau Uap LAa taadi thaaca Batthacataclp alaap aald caatar tlaa ta tu UUraaeUaa with a llaa dram pwUlal aCth aad 37 faac Saatbcrlp af, aa aaaaitad at right aaglaa frM, tha caatar tlaa af aald mala traeki thaaca Mertbaaatcrlp alaag aald paralia tlaa U tha patat af haglaalng. far purpaaac af thla daccrlptlaa the Bate tlaa af aald Sawthaatt Qiarcar la aacuMcd to ha a dua North and South llaa. tdilch la OMod bp H. Noraa" Hafacad, haioincftar callad Nafacad. UHBSSAS, Oraaa aaaha to coatraet with Vapaata for tha uaa af tha Hapaata to aaeva that araa In Orana, aad hp tha cenatruction af a aanltarp aauar actaaalaa In Orono and Vapaata to attach tha to tha wtaclng Vapaau aauar, hnraaftar callad tha laprevataat. THE fmiEs AcasE AS foaoust . ^ • * Is >rspsrsiioa of and Agprovst af flsnsa Hsfstsd disll prapsra iha plans isid spaclfUstlons for tha iBprovaratnt. atfors latting tha canstmetloo cantrsett Oroao shall spprava of said plans sod spae if lest Ions aad will subalt tha plans m4 spacificn* tiona to Wayasts far its approval# Approval aute ba givan or spacifie raasaas far disapproval sutaBictad to Orono within slaty (60) days af subaisslan af tha plana and spacifiestiansa 2a Constniationa Pafitad will construct all portions af tha inpravanant in hath Orono and Vaytats ta ha cosplaud to tha satisfaction af Orana# tha inprowant will ba loeatad subatantUlly as shown an fjihthtc '*A'* attachtd httfta and will ha . liJM ‘ —~ — —^ -5- «m4 ^ tba •ccupMti «f eh* laid 4aicrlbtd 4b**a and aa Curthar uaa mtf ka aada vicboyt «»pr«tt witUB «f VeyMU. ibUlISfBil* li^pvcvBiBBt «KU b« paid for bp HafiCid and m pafttfs •f taid IflffavaaRK nitt ba fmid far bp Omo. tiaii and Hatntawicaa Vapaata ahall concimiallp avpplp Cba Mwav aanrica MBtaaplatad bp this l§Ta —aafc, NaiataBaaea af tba ^atai fran tha prap^tp ta tba Vapaata lift atatiaB aiU ba tba raspaBtibllltp af Orana» aad Wapsata afcaaa that tbap vill «at uaa that portiaa af tba liaas tplaf la Vapaata far taivlclag prapartp vltbla Vapaata vltbaut tba appraval af Otobo. 3« farvica Cbarata* tba UataapalitaB Vatu Coatrol Casdatiaa praaaatlp pap tba aparaUbt tba aanrica apatvi aad ebargaa Orana far tbaaa ai^aBaaa ip rataa aad praeaduraa aatablldbad bp tba Vatropelitaa Vasta Oaaual OaHiaaiaB aad Oraaa ahall VataralBa idiat aacb raaldaBca aball ba ebargad far tba aaatr aarvlca* Sbaald Vapaata la tba bitiira ba ra^lrad ta pap tba aparatlna caat of tbia apataap Oraaa aball pap ta Vapaau a atalMai fuartarlp rau of aaa Mid ooa«baif <1 t/1) tiaaa tba aaoar rata ebargad to Vapaau raaidanu for tba aaaa aavor aanrica* tbo parcantaga rau map ba changed frao tloa ta tiaa bp Mitual agraaoaBt. ^11 Inatallt oalBtalOt aaraica and road all Mtara# bvt Vi^aau and tba Hatropoliun Vaata Caotral CocBltalon will bava accasa to oatara far iBapactioo and aarICIcatlan. 7* Mmlatian af Vaa > Orana agraaa to ragulau and control tba uaa of tbo ioproao* oant within Orana aa aa u prawaot ^a diaebarga af itaoa inu tba Vapaau aowor apataa that la In wiolation of Vapaau ardlnancaa* la cau of aop oaatlBaiag violatloaa af aucb ardinanua after raaaanabla oatiu« Vapuu aball bava tba aptloo to tailoata tbia dgraoBaat. •• itcardi * faeb party will keep prpper baeka and racorda to reflect all OBpaoaaa and receipta applicable ta the aebject natter af tbia Agraencat. Vapuu agraaa that ita baaka will reflact tba application af receipta ta capital and aparatiog atcaunta in accordance with aaund acuunting practica. Eacb party will bava accoaa ta all relevant baaka and raurda af tba atbar. ♦ #• ^ •V » • 9* Adviionr C^wllCft* tth imieipalit7 appaUt M mmhtM af its cayMil ca aa adviaary ccaaittaa abfch ahal’l saat apao raq^tst af aUhtr Villaga far kIm pyrpaaa af aaaaltela§ any 4iaputaa ar prablaaa vaUtlag ta tha laplaMatatiaa af tkia Aart«Mna* Svcli canaUtaa ahatl 4iUsaina thn faata aad lapart ca tha two Cattaaila# with Ita rteaaaaafatiaat. 10. Taiminatiaa* This Aftatsaat may ba taRlnatt4 by tha Hutual airavMat af tha paatUa* Eaaavar« Vayiata say aat umiaata thit AipaaBaat laiUat altaraatiaa aarviaaa ara avaiUbla ta Oraaa an a rtatanahla batit. Aay flaputa laiJar thia apraaBtat bhatl ba aatarvlMd hy biadlag arbitratian in aeearfanea wl^ tha tulaa af tha ABarican Arbitration Aaaoeiatian aad JudaPint vpan tha award Bay ha antarad in any Court hawing Juriadietlan thoraof. If thia AgraoBant bhewld ha tamiaatad by tha Joint action af tha partiaa« Vayaau ahall pnrchaaa and Orana ahall call all afaipBont fybjaat ta thia AgraoMnt and laaatad in Vayaau» at ita original coat laaa aamal dapraciatian and lata that portion of oaaoaaoonto oaoioat Uoyaata praporty applind againat auch original coat. Oatadi 4liilf^Afa ifm 1976* Atuati CITY OP OnONO by - ^Altar B. Maaaangala, Acting Mayor CITY Of HAYZATA a. Monua l$£fttodr~ • o* •••o 00 a a ••• •• • •• •• • REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION REVISED DATE: February 24,2003 ITEM NO: ^ Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Public Scr\ ice Director’s Report Title Director of Public Services Item Description: Schedule Assessment Hearing for North Arm Lane Paving Project This project began in 2002 and last fall quotations were solicited for this project, but the quotations came in high because it was near the end of the construction season. The quotes were not accepted with the intent to solicit quotations again for project completion early this summer. The deadline for contractor submission of quotations for this is project is scheduled for Monday, February 24th. Information on the quotations received will be provided at the Council meeting Acceptance of the quotation for this project will not occur until after the assessment hearing. The costs provided in this memo are estimates based on the feasibility study. Proposed assessment costs, based on the quotations received, will be provided for the meeting Amount of Assessment and Potential City Financial Contribution At the Public Hearing for this project, the neighborhood residents asked if the City would consider a financial contribution for this project and Council directed staff to research this issue and present possible funding options for this project at the assessment hearing. We have studied the possibility of a City financial contribution for this project and our staff recommendation is that a City contribution for some of the project costs may be warranted for sex eral reasons. The first rea.son is that having this road paved will reduce the City's maintenance costs for grading and crushed rock replacement on this road. This is the only gravel road in this area of the City, so it is incnicicnt to mobili/e the road grader to maintain this one road. A paved road would require less maintenance and will also reduce the amount of sediment in the storm water runoff from this road. .Another reason for City financial participation in this project is that the City currently pays for pavement overlays on other public strecis with no assessments to the neighborhood residents. These pavement overlays also include costs tor repair of poor areas in the pavement and shouldering of the road after the overlay is completed. The equivalent cost of a pavement overlay is $9,000 which is about 35% of the project cost. Page 1 of 2 Mm f 1 The estimated project assessment based on the feasibility study cost estimate, and a City contribution of $9,000, is $2,400 per property for seven properties. The proposed interest rate is 6.25% which is the same rate that has l^n used on sanitary sewer projects. The neighborhood residents have requested a ten-year time period for this assessment. However, options for earlier payment of the assessment are available with reduced interest costs. We are recommending Council approval of the attached resolutions declaring the costs to be assessed and scheduling an assessment hearing for 7:00 p.m. at the March 24th Council meeting COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve resolution declaring cost to be assessed and ordering preparation of proposed assessment for the North Arm Lane Paving Project. Motion to approve resolution for hearing on proposed assessment for the North Arm Lane Paving Project. Page 2 of 2 I A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR NORTH ARM LANE PAVING WHEREAS, costs have been determined for the improvement of North Arm Lane paving and the estimated contract price for such improvement is $ 19,548 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $6,152 so that the total estimated cost of the improvement will be $25,700. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO, MINNESOTA: I.The total cost to be assessed against benefitted property owners is declared to be $16,800. 2.Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2004, and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.25 per cent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3.The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against ever>’ assessable lot. piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the clerk's office for public inspection. 4.The Clerk shall upon completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof 2003 Adopted by the City Council of the City ofOrono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held February 24. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee. City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Page I of 1 Ad, 1 Assessment Roll for North Arm i4ine Project Dale: February 24,2003 Municipality: ORONO Levy Number: Total Project Asseismenf: SI6J00 Municipal Code: 38 Project Number: 2003-1 Levy Description: North Arm Lane Paving Project Interest Rale: 6.25% Number of Yean Payable: 10 PID#Addition Code Total Principal Lot Block Name Street Property Address Mailing Street Address Mailing City Address Units --------------------------- 06-117-23 24 0001 $2,400.00 Pa.ss Rxchang: LLC 215 North Arm Lane 2536 18th Ave.S 1 .....Minneapolis, MN 55404 06-117-23 24 0008 42750 $2,400.00 2 1 Harriet Smith 370 North Arm Lane 370 North Arm Lane 1 Mound, MN 55364 06-117-23 24 0011 42757 $2,400.00 1 I Mark & M. Larson 366 North Arm Lane 366 North Arm Lane I • m -m • mo (Mound, MN 55364 06-117-23 24 0012 42757 $2,400.00 2 I Ross Hawkins Jr.360 North Arm Lane 5455 E. Viiginia Ave.1 ......Phoenix, AZ 85008 06-117-23 24 0013 050^0 $2,400,00 I 1 James Neilson 340 North Arm Lane 340 North Arm Lane 1 Mound, MN 55364 06-117-23 24 0014 05050 $2,400.00 2 1 Jon Pendleton 350 North Arm I^ne 350 North Arm Lane Mound, MN 55364 I 06-117-23 24 0015 06887 $2,400.00 1 1 David & Carla Sipprell 345 North Arm Lane 345 North Arm Lane 1 Mound, MN 55364 $16,800.00 Page I of I ■A mu inliaaihioiiili A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT NORTH ARM LANE PAVING WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on February 24,2003 the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of the North Arm Lane paving, and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in the Clerk's office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 24* day of March 2003 in the Orono Council Chambers. 2780 Kelley Parkway, at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. The clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owTier of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. 3 The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the Ct.'Unty Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City, except that no interest may be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at anytime thereafter, pay to the City the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with the interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held February 24,2003 ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Pctereon, Mayor r REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: February 24,2003 ITEM NO.: % Department Approval: Nane Gregory A. Gappa Tllle Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: ^7 Agenda Section: Public Service ’s Director’s Report Item Description: Agreement for Year 20o3 Park Mowing Services In 2000, we solicited quotations for annual park mowing services from several area firms. Shaughnessy Lawn Services of Orono provided the lowest quote for this service. This firm has been doing an excellent job, and we have been renewing the agreement on an aimual basis for the past several years. This firm also provides park mowing services for the City of Long Lake. We are recommending adding the month of November to the agreement. The existing agreement currently runs from April through October. This will allow for continued mowing of the parks through November to mulch the fallen leaves. Long Lake currently does this, we tried this last year on a trial basis and it worked well for cleaning up the parks before winter. Shaughnessy Lawn Services is interested renewing their agreement for another year with a cost adjustment of $1,400 which includes adding the month of November to the agreement and also covers increased fuel and labor costs. This is a reasonable increase, and we are recommending acceptance of the quotation of $ 1 6,000 from Shaughnessy Lawn Service for year 2003 park mowing services COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED; Motion to accept quotation from Shaughnessy Lawn Ser\ ice, Orono Minnesota for the 2003 season, park mowing serv ices in the amount of $16,000. 0 m I REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: February 24,2003 ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Public Services Director’s Report Item Description: Request for Purchase of a Replacement Utility Truck The 1'' ’3 Sewer and Water Utility Funds Capital Equipment Budgets included $55,000 (Sewer Fund V35,OOT', Water Fund $20,000) for the replacement of the 1994 utility truck and access. >1165. This truck has 145,000 miles on it and is in poor mechanical condition. The utility truck is 1 a daily basis and also for emergency call outs for incidents such as lift station alarms. The truck will be purchased through the Cooperative Purchasing State Bid Contract from Hinckley Chevrolet and is a model K-3500, diesel,!-ton four wheel drive truck. The cost for the truck is $29,500. We are recommending the purchase of a Chevrolet Uiick because our other small trucks are all Chevrolet brand which allows for the standardization of repair and maintenance supplies. The existing truck box was purchased in 1994 with the truck, but the hoist is a 1988 model that was retained from the previous utility truck. The new box will have a built-in inverter that runs off of the truck engine to provide 120 volt electricity for the operation of small electric tools and the ventilation blower. Currently, we are using a separate gasoline-powered generator to operate the electric equipment. The inverter will eliminate the need to use the separate generator. The new box will also have more storage space and separated compartments for more organized storage of tools and supplies. The truck box and hoist will be purchased through the Cooperative Purchasing State Bid Contract from Crystecl Truck Equipment, Fridley Minnesota. The cost for this equipment including installation is $20,000. The existing utility truck with the ho\ and hoist will be sold as a complete unit at an upcoming Hennepin County u.sed vehicle auction. This will maximize the auction value of the truck and acces.sones. The total cost for the truck and accessories is $49,500 which is less than the budgeted amount of $55,000. We are recommending the purchase of this equipment from the listed vendors Page 1 of 2 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Approve purchase of a Chevrolet 1-ton utility truck from Hinckley Chevrolet, Hinckley, Minnesota for $29,500 to be frmded as follows; $19,000, Year 2003 Sewer Utility Fund Capital Equipment Budget, and $10,500, Year 2003 Water Utility Fund Capital Equipment Budget. Approve purchase of a utility truck box and hoist from Ciysteel Truck Equipment, Fridley Minnesota for $20,000 to be frmded as follows; $13,000, Year 2003 Sewer Utility Fund Capital Equipment Budget, and $7,000, Year 2003 Water Utility Fund Capital Equipment Budget. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION FEB 2 4 2003 CITY OF ORONO DATE: February 24,2003 ITEM NO.: fO Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Public Services Director's Reportm Item Description: North Long Lake East Server Extension Comprehensive Plan* MUSA Expansions The 2000 Comprehensive Plan MUSA area expansions included the lakeshore on the northeastern portion of Long Lake. This area is in the 2*acre zone and has larger lot sizes for which septic systems are generally a viable solution for treatment of sanitary waste. However, the replacement of existing nonconf rming septic systems on these properties could result in the loss of trees and yard space, and on a small number of lots it may be difficult to find adequate septic sites to allow for redevelopment of the property. The intent of adding these areas to the MUSA was to provide the option of having sanitary sewer installed if the property owners were willing to be assessed for all of the project costs. The.se are larger lots and the cost of gravity sewer and City owned lift stations becomes cost prohibitive with project assessments in the range of $30,000 to $40,000 per unit, and very expensive connections to the f’ravity sewer. The installation of a pressure sewer system is a more feasible and cost-effective option for this area. For this type of system, the property owners own and maintain their own individual residential grinder pump stations w hich is the same concept as private ownership of septic system pumps. This MUSA expansion area is adjacent to the 1997 North Long Lake Sewer Project. East North Long Lake Sewer Project 1 he 2000 MUSA expansion area, south of County Road 6, along the northeastern shore of Long Lake contains 10 homes betw een the east end of the existing North Long Lake sewer and East Long Lake Road. This area can logically be divided into two separate areas for possible sewer projects as there is a distance of 1,000 feet and a creek and a large wetland separating the areas labeled A and B on the attached aerial photograph. 1 he sew cr w ould have to be extended across area A before Area B could obtain sewer, but Area B should logically be considered a separate project with its own project cost and unit assessments or connection fees. Page 1 of 3 A preliminary cost estimate has been prepared for the installation of a pressure sewer system across area A. The estimated cost for this project is $16,000 per unit. At the January 27, 2003 Council meeting, the extension of sewer was approved for 1405 Sixth Avenue North, this is the westernmost property in Area A. The property agreed to pay a connection fee of $ 16,000 and provide an easement at no cost for the extension of pressure sewer system across his property. Request for Sewer Service We have now received a request for sewer from John Mackay 1145 Sixth Avenue North which is the easternmost property in Area A. Sewering of this property would require installation of sewer across the entire area A. The property has a nonconforming four bedroom septic system and does not have suitable replacement septic sites, because of steep topography and wetlands. Financing Options Mr. Mackay has contacted tlie owners of the three properties between his property and 1405 Sixth Avenue North, and these owners have agreed to grant a sewer easement across their property. At an estimated unit cost of $16,000, the cost to extend sewer to Mr. Mackay's property is $64,000. He has stated that he is willing to pay for the cost to extend sewer to his property with the understanding that any sewer connection fees collected by the City for the three properties are refunded to him as they are collected. At this time, two of these property owners have not expressed any interest in an immediate connection to the sewer. The third property owner is experiencing problems with the septic system and may be interested in connection to the sewer this summer. • .Another option may be for Mr. Mackay to pay a '116,000 connection fee and the City would then finance the remaining $48,000 in costs until the middle properties connect to sewer. This would eliminate the need to refund Mr. Mackay's cost in the future. City financing of these sewer costs w ould not be unprecedented as on several of the recent sewer expansion projects the City is holding these costs until future connection of properties with conforming septic systems. With the current low interest rate climate, the holding cost for these units is minimal and there is an adequate balance in the Sewer Utility Fund to cover these costs. There is no requir.”nent that these three properties have to connect to sewer, but it is likely that the owners will connect to sewer in the future because the replacement of their nonconforming septic systems will require the removal of many trees as these lots are all heavily wooded. The one property owner that is interested in possible connection to sewer this sewer has already stated that she does not want to lose trees for a new septic system. The plans for this project arc substantially complete, so bids can be obtained soon and the project constructed as soon as the weather allows this spring. Page 2 of 3 Li Staff Rccomncndatitii We are recommending approval of a pressure sewer extension project to serve the remaining four properties in East Long Lake Area A at an estimated cost of $ 16,000 per unit with the understanding that the necessary easements for this project will be provided to the City at no cost, and the property owner at 1 145 Sixth Avenue Noith pays the $64,000 cost for this project unless the City agrees to finance the $48,000 in costs for three of the units. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve a pressure sewer extension project to serve the remaining four properties in East Long Lake Area A at an estimated cost of $1 6,000 per unit with the understanding that the necessary easements for this project will be provided to the City at no cost, and the property owner at 1145 Sixth Avenue North pays the $64,000 cost for this project unless the City agrees to finance the $48,000 in costs for tluee of the units. Discus possible funding options for the completion of this sewer extension project. Page 3 of 3 1 ^ wa I A A4 -»CT| XW'l!WC^/ V ^ taoiiA u»i^v" law snvf^^ r*.ojecT p'^op J1 x4j AVt F3ov*ih " ITv^ PropCr-TV/ T(?^^ rf'7T*** *‘j'v*^*' f ^v■'• 5‘,t V'5 Jill / V* A s«w - -»5^ ^ ■^■’r“’\- . .r'-.-rv j.v-.'i’rrrTrtJT:-?;';* -/ mm mi mmm<* >; V- r*?T^' wv .'■ /J6 M#3l•fXh •• .' • *» ? •r, ‘i: vV. • ' t •r'# V *1 Z »-'v*iii?> >'^ ^w#... ,,xyehi.i -1., i{ x..vr>A)..-.;.v. r-!y .mm ‘r'ioh ;VJ ti e>.! » • .-'...I r'T mm I ^ ^WM K,: seujitL iKTFCJsicF m^m ^ii \!»W, *.*i ^ ^ am '■ J i!®’' prcpcnx, “ f • * ‘‘M V ,'iA- .1, M4h .f« . ,-i [M lioo' 0 i^mctue.- 1^ seiglic op^[cfir Cire {\rti\(^ by ia^t f^cr r February 18,2003 Mr. Gregory A. Gappa P.£. Director of Public Services City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkwuy Orono, MN 55356 Dear Greg; 1 have talked with all the owners of land to the West of 1145 County Road Six, who would need to grant a right of way for the sewer. And they have either in writing or verbally said that they would grant the right of way. They are: Maty Dayton (1305 County Road Six), John and Madonna Rotondo (1295 County Road Six) and Peter and Colleen Grant (1245 County Rixul Six). It is too soon to say when some or all of these properties would hook into the new sewer line. As soon as the new house at 1145 County Road Six is built, it will hodc into the line. And as 1 understand it, at least two of the other three properties have issues with their existing sewer system. As I indicated to you, I will pay to put the sewer line in across the four properties with the understanding that t^ money be refunded to me when a house hooks into the line. On the other hand if the City of Orono is willing to carry this cost, 1 would be very appreciative. As 1 understand it, the cost per property to put the sewer line in is approximately $16,1 m Thank you for your work on diis project and getting it on the Counsel agenda for next Monday. Most sincerely, CeU Phrvi; til--0061 Memo Bontsiroo Roscnt 1KH|\J| Associates TO: Greg Gappa FROM: Tom Kellogg (651) 604-4863 DATE OF REPORT: January 23,2003 RE: East Long Lake Sewer Extension Cost Estimate: Attached is an itemized cost estimate for the sanitary sewer extensioti ^erv’e the five properties east of-the Lund property along the north shore of Long Lake. The cost estimate is for all work necessary to construct a pressure sewer and provide curb stops to each of the five properties. The costs assume the project would be constructed in two parts. The first part would be the installation of approximately 600-feet of 2” HOPE to serve the former Flint property. The remaining 1200-feet would be installed sometime in the future. The cost estimate assumes an alignment on the lakeside of the Flint property and then north of (in back of) the four homes to the east. The final alignment will require a meeting with all property owners to determine conflicts and acquire the necessary easements. The estimated construction costs do not include any allowance for easement acquisition. Based on the estimated total construction cost the assessment to each of the five property owners would be about $15,900. For planning purposes you can assume the same assessment to serve the property immediately north of the Flint property. Keep in mind that each home will require an ind.vidual grinder pump and connection between the home and the curb stop. This work is not included in the cost estimate and will need to be completed by a licensed plumber. In addition, c.xisting septic systems will need to be abandoned in accordance with City regulations. Costs on past projects for the grinder pump, connection to the home and abandonment of the septic s>steni have ranged between $6,500 and $10,000. These costs should be added to the cost estimate to give the property ow ners an indication of what their total costs might be. Please let me know if you need anything else or have any questions. Bonsitroo, /?o«ww, Andrllk and A9Soel»t9S, Inc. 2335 West Highway 36 •»- St. Paul, MN 55113 Phone: 651-636-4600 + Fax; 651-636-1311 CITYOFORONO North tong Lake Sewer Extension Preliminary Cost Estimate BRA File No. 139-03-125 Preliminary Cost Estimate V Hi".; . '-'T5N9S?’ EST. _____________!IEM______________UNIT QUANTITY 2" HOPE SDR 11, directional bore Sanitary service, incl. curb stop Flushing station connection Air release manhole Connect to existing manhole Seeding incl. topsoil, mulch, fert. Estimated Construction Cost +5% Contingencies — A -if UNIT PRICE LF 1800 $17.00 EA 5 2,500.00 EA 2 2,500.00 EA 1 8,000.00 EA 1 1.000.00 AC 1 3,000.00 •>■20% Legal, Engineering and Administration +5% Capitalized Interest and Bonding Total Estimated Cost Ptdkrinui Cost Estimate (1-23-03)j(to EST. COST • III $30,600 12,500 5. 8. 1,000 3, III •II • $60,100 3,005 $63,105 12,621 $75,726 3.786 $79,512 •’'r REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION FEB 2 4 2003 CITY OF ORONO DATE: February 24,2003 ITEM NO.: / ( Department Approval: Name Greg Oappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: Item Description: Bid Award - Equipment & Materials Bid 2003 Agenda Section: Public Services Directors Report The City of Orono advertised for two successive weeks for street materials and equipment rental, with the bid opening at 1:00 PJV\. Friday, February 14,2003. The enclosed tabulation contains a complete accounting of all bids. The accepted low bids for materials are determined by availability and location of materials. Traveling distance to a supplier is considered a cost factor when determining a low bid. When renting equipment with an operator, we are guided by the type, size of equipment, and an hourly rate. It is possible to award the low bid to more than one contractor when considering materials and equipment. In order to stimulate enthusiasm for the following year's work, we make sure to divide the work .ccordingly among these low bidders. In the event the low bidder is not available, the City reserves the right to purchase from the next alternate. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the bids as presented for the calendar year 2003. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the year 2003 Materials and Equipment Bids. iiifmHftitrienMiiiiiL. i C: TO:Oreg Gappa, Public Services Director FROM: Jack Brinkhaus, Public Works Supervisor DATE:February 24,2003 SUEUECT: Bid Award - Equipment & Materials Bid 2003 The City of Orono advertised for two successive weeks for street materials and equipment rental, with bid opening at 1:00 PA1., Friday, February 14,2003. The enclosed tabulation contains a complete accounting of all bids. The accepted low bids for materials are determined by availability and location of materials. Traveling distance to a supplier is considered a cost factor when determining a low bid. When renting equipment with an operator, we are guided by the type, size of equipment, and an hourly rale. It is possible to award the low bid to more than one contractor when considering materials and equipment. In order to stimulate enthusiasm for the following year's work, we make sure to divide the work accordingly among these low bidders. In the event the low bidder is not available, the City reserves the right to purchase from the next alternate. I recommend that the City Council accept the bids as presented for the calendar year 2003. ' a:’"’.?:' ■ jAh-Vt •'-•• *i CITY OF ORONO 2003 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE ITEM III, til A, 112 & #3 #1 CLASS 5 GRAVEL TON PIT DFX. #1A CLASS 5 GRAVEL TON RECYCLED PIT DEL. #2 FA-2 CLASS C (SEAL COAT) TON PIT DEL. #3 FA-1 (WINTER SAND) TON PIT DEL. Barton Sand &, Gravel Co.7.40 10.86 7.40 10.86 *7.40 10.86 Buffalo Bituminous *6.00 *10.40 7.00 11.50 Midwest Asphalt Corp.*5.86 *9.85 SA-AG *6.76 « Denotes low bid :i^v' ' /i /.■. 7‘, : ' V CITY OF ORONO 2003 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE ITEM H M 11/2" CI.KAN C'ROSIIKD UMRSTONR TON H4 1 1/2" MINUS CRUSH Kl) LIMKSTONK TON 3/4" CLEAN CRUSHED LIMESTONE TON 84 3/4" MINUS CRUSHED LIMESTONE TON 1 PIT DKI..PIT l)KI..PIT DEL.PIT Bryan Rock Produrls *10.44 *14.86 *6.71 *11.13 *10.44 *14.86 *6.71 *11.13 • ITEM H5A, H6 85 MC 30,70, 250,800 CALLON PL/\NT DEL. & PLACED 85A CRS.1&2 GALLON PLANT DEI,. & PI.ACED 86 RC 250-800 GALI.ON 1 PLANT DEL. & PLACED Buffalo Biliiminniis *2.45 *3.00 MitlwcKl Asphalt .5.33 * Dcnotrs low bid r CITY OF ORONO 2003 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE ITEM HI & »7A m 2331 Type 31 AC Plant Mix «7 2331 Type 31 AC Plant Mix #7 2331 Type 31 AC Plant Mix #7A 2331 Type 31 MC Plant Mix «7A 2331 Type 31 MC Plant Mix #7A 1 2331 Type 31 I MC Plant Mix 1 PLANT DELIVERED PLACED PLANT DELIVERED PLACED Buffalo Bituminous *26.50 *31.00 *33.50 Commercial Asphalt 29.07 Midwest Asphalt 28.25 31.68 38.40 ITEM m & USA 2331 Type 41 AC Plant Mix PLANT ms 2331 Type 41 AC Plant Mix dkuvi :ri :d «8 2331 Type 41 AC Plant Mix PLACED 2331 Type 41 MC Plant Mix PLANT #8A 2331 Tvpe41 MC Plant Mix DELIVERED #8A 2331 Type 41 MC Plant Mix PLACED Buffalo Bituminous *26.50 *31.00 *33.50 Commercial Asphalt 29.07 Midwest Asphalt 28.49 31.95 41.80 * Denotes low bid CITY OF ORONO 2003 BID TABUI.ATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE DID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY R.VTE ITEM iiSB, #SC, mo «8lt MOD. FINK MIX 2X11 Type 41 AC/TON #8C MOD. FINE MIX 2331 Type 41 MC/TON «8D 1 MOD. FINE MIX SO • 50 2331 Type 41 AC/MC/TON I'l.ANT DKL.PI.ACEII I’l.ANT DEI„Pl.ACED PLANT DEL.PLACED Buffalo Bituminous *27.95 *31.45 *35.25 1----------------- Commercial Asphalt 10.35 . Midwest Asphalt 28.49 31.95 43.75 1 ITEM#9,«I0.#11 #9 FIII.L DEPTH HITCMINOIIS PAVEMENT RECLAMATION PRICE/CUBIC YARD 810 SALVAGE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PRICE/CUBIC YARD 811 SUB^RADE EXCAVATION 1 PRICE / CUBIC YARD Buffalo Bituminous 4.50 *15.00 *24.95 Midwest Asphalt *1.45 29.00 29.00 * Denotts low bid Cl IY OF OKONO 2003 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE ITEM # 12 ALI. PRICES TO BE DELIVERED 12" CMP 16 GAUGE 15" CMP 16 GAUGE 18" CMP 16 GAUGE 24" CMP 14 GAUGE 24" CMP 16 GAUGE 36" CMP 14 GAUGE 48" CMP 12 GAUGE 60" CMP 10 GAUGE All Steel Products 8.00 10.00 12.00 *20.00 16.00 30.00 55.00 86.00 Johnston Fareo *7.88 *9.69 *11.50 23.64 *15.02 *28.01 *51.12 *80.57 ITEM 812a (Apron) ALL PRIC ES TO BE DELIVERED 12" APRON 15" APRON 18" APRON 24" APRON 36" APRON 48" APRON * 60" APRON All Steel Produets *42.50 *54.00 *70.00 *104.50 *307.50 *700.00 *1200.00 Johnston Fareo 46.86 57.51 74.55 112.89 330.15 724.20 1278.00 1 ITEM m 2a (Band) 1 ALL PRIC ES TO 1 BE DELIVERED 12" BAND 15" BAND 18" BAND 24" BAND 36" BAND 48" BAND 60" B/\ND All Sled Products *10.00 15.00 18.00 24.(K)45.00 80.00 130.00 Johnson Fargo 11.82 *14.54 *17.25 *22.52 *42.01 *76.68 *120.77 * Drnotvs low bid ' -r'J? 1. ; II CITY OF ORONO 2003 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE ITEM #13 TRUCK RENTAL TRUCK RENTAL TRUCK RENTAL TRUCK RENTAL PER CY HOUR RATE PER CY HOUR RATE PER CY HOUR RATE PER CY HOUR RATE Allied Blacktop Schoenine Excavatlnf 12 *50.00 15 *55.00 • * Denotes low bid i CITY OF ORONO 2003 BID TABUI.ATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS - EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE ITEM ^14 RACKIIOi; pi:k hour cv raie BACKIlOK PER HOUR CY rate BACKIIOE PER HOUR CY RATE Schocnine Excavatine 3/4 *75.00 1 *100.00 * Denotes low bid ITEM til5 J/4 rON PICKUP W/8 PI.OW PER HOUR Schoening Excavating *60.00 ITEMtll6 WHEEL LOADER PER HOUR CY rate WHEEL LOADER PER HOUR CY RATE WHEEL LOADER PER HOUR CY RATE Schoening Excavating 3 *80.00 1 FEB 2 4 a003 CITY OF ORONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE; February 24,2003 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Public Service's Director's Repon Item Description: Replacement of West Fmdale Road/ Browns Bay Channel Bridge- Resolution The existing bridge at West Femdale Road and Browns Bay Channel needs to be replaced. This is a 1961 construction, single span steel girder bridge, with a timber deck that has been overlain with asphalt pavement. This bridge has been deteriorating for the past several years, but the condition was previously not bad enough to qualify for state bridge replacement funding. The recently completed bridge inspection revealed an accelerated rate of corrosion on the steel support beams. The recommendation from the bridge inspector and bridge engineers at Bonestreo Engineers is that this bridge needs to be posted for a 3-ton gross vehicle w eight limit, and that the steel beams at the abutments be encased in concrete. Weight limit signs will be installed at the bridge and advance warning signs will be installed at both ends of West Femdale Road. The east end of this road is in the City of Wayzaia, and they have been contacted about this bridge weight posting. We have contacted the school bus companies for both the Orono and Wayzata School Districts and, fortunately, neither district runs school buses on West Femdale Road. Public Works personnel will complete the concrete encasement work at the abutments. This is a relatively simple job, and the forming work will be done now' as there is sufficient ice to allow’ for completion of the work under the bridge. The concrete fill will be placed as soon as the temperature is warm enough. Access under the bridge is not required for the concrete work as this material can be placed through holes in the deck This bridge now is eligible for state bridge replacement Amding because of the posted weight limit on the bridge. Council approval of the attached resolution is recommended, so we can begin the application process for state bridge replacement funding. The estimated replacement cost for this bridge is $150,000. At this time, we are unsure of the schedule for replacement of this bridge. As more infomiation becomes avail ible. we will report back to the Council. Tlie ideal situation w ould be to replace the bridge this : ummer. as there is a lot of construction truck traffic on West Femdale Road because of lakeshore housing redevelopment projects. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve resolution requesting financial assistance from the State of Minnesota for replacement of the deficient bridge at West Femdale Road and Brow ns Bay Channel. A RESOLUTION PRIORITIZING REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE STRUCTURES WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature has provided funds for assistance in the rehabilitation or reconstruction of deficient bridges; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono has analyzed the deflcient bridges needing replacement on City streets; and WHEREAS, it is apparent that there is insufficient funding at the local level for completion of these bridge replacement projects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono Cit> Council does hereby request fiiumcial assistance in the replacement of the following bridge. APl/AMCf W^VUIM^ SI4M WMiM IM^ SiCh \/CB»CLP Ll KA\*T Ji k Co^ ^»^#« • FEB 2 4 2003 CtTY OF ORONO REQUEST FOR COUNat ACTION DATE: February 20,2003 ITEM NO: /J Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Ron Moorse U/)City Administrator's Title City Administrator __Kh___Report Item Description: Payment of Maple Plam Fire Service Costs Attached is a letter from the Maple Plain City Attorney regarding the payment ofeosts related to fire service provided by Maple Plain for the years 2000 through 2002. Also attached is a memo from the Orono Finance Director recommending payment of the amount requested by Maple Plain. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the payment in the amount of $99,096.30 to the City of Maple Plain for fire service provided in the years 2000 through 2002, and to amend the 2002 fire service budget to reflect the additional $7,580.00 expenditure beyond the budgeted amount. 1 JCrrRCY A. CARSON WILLIAM O. CLCLLANO CLLCN M. 8CHRCOCR DAVID K. ROSS ANNA KRAUSC CRABB CARSON. CLELLAND & SCHREDER ATTORNEYS AT LAW PROrCSSlONAL LIMITCD LIABILITY RARTNCRSNIP 6300 SHINOLC CRCCK PARKWAY, SUlTC 30S MINNCAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55430*2 190 TCLtPNONC I 763 I 561 2000 ^AX I 763 I56i 1943 February 4,2003 Ron Moorse Orono City Administrator 2750 Kelley parkway P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE: Fire Service Payments Dear Mr. Moorse: The City of Maple Plain has turned over to me the issue of past amounts due from the City of Orono for fire service. I enclose copies of information that you have received for the three year period that monies are owed. As you can see, the amount owed through 2002 of $99,096.30 is a considerable amount of money. The City of Maple Plain demands payment immediately. Under Minnesota law, municipalities are charged interest for all outstanding debts over 30 days. If the above amount is not paid by the end of February 2003,1 am going to recommend to the City Council that suit be brought to collect the amounts owed, plus interest. Your prompt attention to this matter will be appreciated. Thank you. Very truly yours, CARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDER Maple Plain City Attorney JAC:gn Enclosures cc: City of Maple Plain A 1 r. City of Maple Plain SttMtA4iMM ICVM^Avit MipUPUa,MN5S359 MulfagAadfMi P.O.Boii97 M^dcFhin.MN 55359 FiLe” Gor/ December 9,2002 CityofOrono P.O. Box 66 Ciyital Bay. MN SS323 STATEMENT FIRE SERVICE 2000 Actual FIRE SERVICE 2001 Actual FIRE SERVICE 2002 Estimated S27.251.68 $29,505.66 Sdzmsi $99,096.30 TalipliaBt 763-4794515 • Fax 7634794519 -iMfl dlylMlIi amafllaelaln.cQm • www.maBl«B>dn.eom 7 'A fli IfOM Wj0g:2t tOllZ -QE-utr ► 4 Memo To: Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Tom Kuehn, Finance^^ict(^^*^ Date: February 19,2003 Re: Payment of the Maple Plain Fire Ser\'ice Charges Attachments: (1) Summary of invoices to be authorized for payment by the City Council at the Februar)' 24,2003 City Council meeting. (2) Letter to Maple Plain city attorney Jeffrey A. Carson (to be sent with check for payment in full of all fire service costs). The total of the invoices from Maple Plain is $99,096.30, and covers the three year period 2000 through 2002. For this same time period we have accrued $91,518.00 in budgeted expense. Therefore, the Orono budget for the 2002 fire serv ice from Maple Plain needs to be increased by $7,580.00. As you know, we have had many problems and frustrations in dealing with the administrative aspects of the Maple Plain fire service contract. Our requests for information have usually been ignored, and that is why the billings have not been paid. 1 recommend that we pay the billings as presented so we can bring this issue to a conclusion. I also recommend that we send the check, along with a letter indicating that this is the final and complete payment for all amounts owing to the City of Maple Plain, to the Maple Plain city attorney. I have included a draft letter to Carson. Tooi'Waii Pitfcuiflicfoffia.kicaiaty^Ufit FU ua Fire Fuul Mpd 1 m 0) Payable to:CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN Summary of Invoices Presented for Payment 02/24/03 Invoice Number 11W*1| 2000 2001 2002 Total Invoices Invoice A $27,251.68 $29,505.66 $42,338.96 Description Fire Service Year 2000 Fire Service Year 2001 Fire Service Year 2002 $99,066.30 The attached invoices have been reviewed. The total of the 2000 and 2001 amounts are within the total amount budgeted for those two years. The 2002 amount is within the amended budget amount for the year 2002. The total of all invoices is recommended for approval of the Orono City Council. Thomas M. Kuehn, Finance Director 1 A city of MapI* Flain Flrt Dfpirtmant 2000 BXPBNSeS ^4 (I) ■.. ■■*: 2000 OMBURtEMENTS Coat of Houalng Bquipmant Coat of IquIpmanI Rtplaeamant Lata: Hann Parka Raeatpt Laaa: Inauranca Pram Tax $166,328.00 $16,000.00 $35,000.00 ($1,500.00) ($20,364.00) Coat to ba Olvidtd $107,444.00 City Tax Capacity %Coat tndapandanea $2,474,662.00 42.51%$63,040.77 Mapla Plain $1,670,257.00 34.00%$67,138.76 Madina $85,417.00 1.47%$2,897.45 Minnatriata $478,030.00 6.21%$16,216.36 Orono $603,362.00 13.60%$27,251.68 $^,820,668.00 100%$107,444.00 I 0) city of Mapio Plain FIra Dapartmant 2001BUDOIT 2001 ACTUAL EXPENSES Coat of Houaing Equipmant Coat of Equipmant Raplacamant Laaa: Hann Parka llaealpt Laaa: inauranea Prom Tax $100,743.00 $10,000.00 $35,000.00 ($1,000.00) ($10,229.00) Coat to ba OMdad ; $922,014.00 i 'A mifi'ON 'S City Tax Capacity •A Coat Indapandanet $2,070,500.00 49.10% $100,117.03 Mapla Plain $1,502,737.00 32.59%$72,346.36 Madina $07,370.00 1.46%$3,243.64 Minnatflata $340,000.00 7.57%$16,706.44 Orono $612,959.00 13.20%$29,509.72 $4,611,547.00 100%S222,014.o6 1/^ "#• ■ Hd0e:2l E002 CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN PROPOSED 2002 FIRE BUDGET Personnel Cost Firemen's Relief Assoc Other Costs * Subtotal Cost of Housing Equipment •Cost of Equipment Replacement • • S 63,646.00 59.257.00 134.850.00 5257,753.00 18,000.00 62.753.00 Cost of EquiptRe-it replacement is new truck end radio amortized for 15 years et 6% innuaJly. 0) Subtotal S 80,753.00 Total Department Budget . $338,506.00 Credits • » Hennepin Parks Contract State Aid 1% Ins. Tax S 1,500.00 20.382.00 Subtotal Credits S 21,882.00 Total for Distribution • S 316,624.00 City Percent • • Tex Caoeeitv AmountOrono Minnetrista Medina Independence Maple Plain 13.372 7.611 1.469 44.762 32.784 612,959.00- 348,886.00 67,375.00 2.051.770.00 1.502.737.00 S 42,338.96*^ 24,098.25 4,651.20 141,727.23 103.802.01 100%S4.583.727.00 $316,617.65 t ‘A lllfi’QN WdOS:Zl e002 -OC'U'f DRAFT'- February 25,2003 Carson, C lei land & Schreder, Attorneys at Law 6300 Shingle Creek Parkway, Suite 305 Minneapolis, MN 55430-2190 Attention: Jeffrey A. Carson, City Attorney for the City of Maple Plain RE: FIRE SERVICE PAYMENTS At the regular City Council meeting held on Monday, Februaiy 24,2003, the City Council of the City of Orono approved the payment of all outstanding unpaid claims for fire scr\ ice provided to the City of Orono by the fire department of the City of Maple Plain. With the deposit of the enclosed check, in the amount of $99,096.30. the City of Maple Plain stipulates and agrees that said check is payment in full of all claims for the service years 2000, 2001 and 2002; and also stipulates and agrees that said check represents payment in full for any and all other claims from the City of Maple Plain against the City o! Orono, in so far as all fire ser% ice and/or fire service related charges, ''laims or costs, whether past or present, up to and including the contract termination date of December 31, 2002, whether those charges, claims or costs be now known, or unknown. The City of Orono has previously made known, but again wishes to express its appreciation for the fire protection services provided by the fire department of Maple Plain, and wishes to thank the members of the fire department for the many years of fine sen ice. Trusting this now concludes all financial obligation on the part of the City of Orono to the city of Maple Plain with regards to the provision of fire protection. Sincerely, Thomas M. Kuehn Finance Director/Treasurer of the City of Orono end. UPTumimmOJO) MPfire-FMiai »pd REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION OO*■**'>» T|NO FEB 242003 CITY OF ORONO DATE: February 20,2003 ITEM NO: / H Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: Item Description: WeCAN Request for leflcr of Support for CDBG Funding Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Attached is a letter from Western Communities Action Network(WeCAN) requesting a letter from the City in support of their application for CDBG funds. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion regarding sending a letter of support from the City regarding »hc WeCAN request for CDBG funding. ' '' Western Communities Action Network Family Support Services ■ Meals on Wheels D Human Services D Job Development Placement 1155 C%»uiif\ R.»jJ 19 Mimwfri\t.t. MN 5S564 mZ) 471- 074: <9>:) 47:.55>'> (FAX) SERVICE AREA C.*eenJit!U f/curd inJcrtTviercd ReeV'erd Lotcr.o Si Cor^ JC US SpnngPjrk Mumct:f> i BeJC^ Tcnfci Bj/ f/irm s*j VVe*.:cfn Ororo OFFICERS Mjfk V/ifittr PidSiticnl VP CfCiV P .if Pjnk David Sultofi Vice Ffciidtnl Comn^n^fy Vohntur Iti Jcn;fn Sccrc*)ty /l5kV. J^fPjShKPjJkiew Co\f%in: >uf:h Mjfv'rt Johnson htiuty Vj, Cf of fr^ertnJt\e BOARD OF OIRECTORS Craig Anderson f,hnrtt’ts*j Ch.tl Vtrn Brandenburg Sharon Cool s.ommur,t^ JunUtr Mary OeVr-feg < Sn: f Oavf Carsick i' ' ;fit.Church len Harrell '..Vu r; wi* Cf'rt Helmar He:l«l / t'l <.’JCh. i*4.rC/ij/:h BayMcC:/ L^ ^yr v.".i s r % Oorolh/ M;Cu:«n Vd' Sata.1 Mfyett Mjrl|i HfiSw.i M' tl **: Chjflei Fu;h . . '.w - \V/* S)b tomalhj $«t V/iliiamt Wi February 3,2003 Mayer Barbara Peterson and City Council Members City of Orono PO Box ’64 Crystal Fjay, MN 55323 Dear Mayor Peterson and Council Members: On behalf of the WcCAN Board of Directors, I am again aski.” ’ the City of Orono to support our request for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. As a community-based human service orgar.ization dedicated to helping people achieve greater self-sufficiency and family stability we appreciate your continued support. WeCAN provides a variety of services to low- income residents in western Hennepin County. In most cases WeCAN is the only provider of these services in our communities. Our programs include; Emergency housing and utility assistance, Job Counseling, Meals on Wheels, Family Support serv ices, public assistance intake services, and access to family mental health couitseling. In 2002, we served 969 families in our service area. Of those served, 25 were Orono residents. Enclosed for your review is detailed information of the services provided in our 12 city service area. During these turbulent economic times, WeCAN has witnessed the increased burden on families .n financial and emotional crisis. Many of our clients are the working poor v^ho barely earn enough income to get by. Any financial setback can be devastating for the entire family. The requests for our services continues to grow every year. As you know, your cit>’s CDBG allocation is now part of a pool of funds from communities receiving less than $75,000 annually in CDBG funding. This year W'eCAN is again requesting S 15,000 from CDBG funds. If you have any questions or would like additional information, please r. ,«•:■ iii- ■ '■ :■•■•'■ . It > •< ■•.’• ..= ■'; . '•■ v 'y ' ,••••• . . •• I. ■^'v‘ •■t^,'.- ‘ -I ■. '1 -■• . ■ . • •-.'l - ■ ■"• -vriij - •- i *')X Western Communities Action Network WeCAN 1155 County Road 19 Minnetrista, MN 55364 952-472-0742 Phone 952-472-5589 Fax www.wecan-helo.ofQ Community Development Block Grant 2002 Statistics ITotal Numbers in Households Served by WeCAN 2002 ProKram Total # in Households Served EmerKency Assist 69 Jobs Proeram 69 Meals on Wheels 79 Family Support 126 Information/Referral 626 Total Served 969 IWeCAN Semces to Households by City* 2002 | Program CITY Emergency Service Jobs Program Meal on Wheels Family Support Referrals City Totals Cry stal Bay 0 0 1 0 2 1 Greenfield 5 0 Independence 9 0 Long Lake 1 l.S 16 Loretto 3 1 0 0 11 1.*; Maple Plain 5 2 16 9 30 62 Mtka. Beach 0 0 0 0 7 7 Minnetrista 0 2 2 1 28 3.3 Mound 37 41 32 69 125 304 Orono 1 2 1 0 21 25 Rockford 5 1 0 14 4.S 65 St. Bonifacius 5 3 2 12 43 65 Spring Park 9 6 22 8 3.S 80 Tonka Bay 0 1 5 10 16 Homeless 3 0 2 l.S 20 Other Cities 1 10 2 6 225 244 Program Totals 69 69 79 126 ^ 626 953 Other Cities includes; VVayzata, Long Lake, Annandale, BrooklyTi Park, Chanhassen New Germany, St. Paul, Waconia, Watertown, Excelsior, Minneapolis Metro Area > r FY 2002 income Guidelines Federal Guidelines# in Household <30%<30%-50%<50%-80% 1 Persons 16,100.00 26,850.00 38,100.00 8,860.00 2 Persons 18,400.00 30,700.00 43,500.00 11,940.00 3 Persons 20,700.00 34,500.00 48,950.00 15,020.00 4 Persons 38,350.00 54,400.00 18,100.00 5 Persons 24,850.00 41,400.00 58,750.00 21.180.00 6 Persons 26,700.00 44,500.00 63,100.00 24,260.00 7 Persons 28,550.00 47,550.00 67,450.00 27,340.00 8 Persons 30,350.00 50.600.J0 71,800.00 30,420.00 . t.'}-K‘ ‘’■.’T '■ “■ ’v^ ’ ’• IWcCAN;Emergency Assistance 2002 TV HHw/ Children Senior, Adult Children HH Adult OnlyHH Senior & I SemW Adult HHlOnly HH Female Head Household # of Total Households >8o-so%of SMSA <SO-30%of SMSA <30%of SMSA Federal PvrtyLvl Adults pntldren Servedl Served I .oretto 1 2 2 3 1 2 1 4 1 •laple Plain 4 1 5 5 1 4 3 5 12 .'tka. Beach 0 'innetrista 0 lound 21 15 1 22 37 1 _________Z 29 19 46 55 rono 1 1 1 1 1 1 :>ckford 4 1 3 5 1 4 1 8 5 .. Bonifadus r 3 1 3I 5 1 4 4 5 2 .pringPark 7 2 7 9 1 8 4___a 14 Tonka Bay 1 0 lomeless 1 2 1 3 3 1 3ther Cities 1 1 1 1 2 2 .Yogram Total::40 0 26 2 1 1 45l 69 2 13 54 34 80 91 J iher Cities: W aconia VVeCAN performed 98 units of Emergency Assistance. '• ’"■ \ '1- ■' "'*•' '-^V' ' ■■ ■•■...'■ r ' • • WeCAN; Jobs Program 2002 HHw/Senior, A^uit Adult Senior &Senior Female Head # of i'otal > 80-50% of <50-30%of <30%of Federal Adults Children cmr Children Children HH OnlyHH Adult HH OnlyHH Household Households SMSA SMSA SMSA Poverty Lvl Served Served Loretto 1 1 1 2 Maple Plain 2 1 2 2 1 3 .>Itka. B^ach 0 ' Minnetrista 2 1 2 2 1 Mound 17 22 2 10 41 9 32 28 54 29 Orono 2 2 2 2 2 'lockford 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3t. Bonifacit’s 2 1 1 3 3 2 4 3 jprinK Park 2 4 1 6 1 5 4 8 2 i'onka Bay 1 1 1 2 Homeless 0 Other cities 1 8 1 3 10 2 2 6 3 14 1 Profcram Totals 23 0 42 1 1 3 i6 69 2 13 54 42 90 37 Other Cities includes; Watertown, Wayzata, Champlin, Minnetonka, Shorewood, Montrose, Brooklyn Park, Crystal Bay, Excelsior, I WeCAN; Meals On Wheels 20021 Adult Senior &Senior Female Head # of Total No Income <50-80% 0^<50-30% 0/ SMSA <30% 0/ SMSA Federal Poverty Lvl Adl/Snr Served!T OnlyHH Adult HH Only HH Household Households Listed SMSA iple Plain 1 16 10 16 9 1 1 5 2 20 ;nnetrista 2 2 1 1 2 iound 2 30 18 3a 19 1 12 5 41 mKLake 1 1 2 i’>*stal Bay 1 1 1 1 1 'rono 1 1 1 1 2 -it. Bonifacius 2 ■> A 2 2 2 2 >rinK Park 1 21 12 22 17 1 4 1 24 2 2 2 1 1 2 i-ojcram Totals 1 2 76 45 79 48 2 3 26 11 96 ASf; IWeCAN; Family Support Services 2002 CITY HHw/ 'hildren Seniorf Adult Children HH Adult OnlyHH Senior & Adult HH Senior & Children Female Head Household # qf Total Households <8o-50%of SMSA <50-30%of SMSA <30%of\ Federal SMSA Adults Other Cities includes: Delano, Waconia, Wayzata, Winsted FEB 2 4 2005 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY OF ORONO DATE: February 20* 2003 ITEM NO; 15 Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Ron Moorse ____________ City Administrator's Title City Administrator Report Item Description: Payment Requests-L^g Lake Fire Station The City has received two invoices for payment for work related to the fire station. BKV Group, for architectural services in the amount of $1,263.41. Best Access Systems for access keys in the amount of $26.55. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the requests for payment as follows: BKV Group in the amount of $1.263.41, and Best access Systems in the amount of $26.55, to be funded from the Joint Fire Account. I w K V C ft 0 u ^ AfthittCKM ImarisrOMi^ . .••.• * • : ; \V ••••*• • ■oarmon •# ySS;- OriiM •.* •: • . ••• • », • • •• XnKiarih SacMfSttitr: 45401UvOm 6ru»vsifaninaii 4t2J4?42a wtvw.bkvffAup.cbm lOf ». •• . : # . *- . j .'x 166/200*4 HOT# ••*• V'. Invoice fiivoict Number. 204S0 Invoice Date Januety 25,2003 CitvofUoftLeke P.O.BOX406 Loot Lake. MN 55356 protect: IS15.01 City of Leag Lake ProCMsiooel Seaviecs Atouah 1/25/03 BlUiof Greup: Conmetf: flrtSiadOBFcc: AmbataaceScfvlee AliMvatt: TOTAL FEE; $222,600 S 2.S00 S22S.100 Coetnet Amotton Percent Complete: PeeEemed: Prior Fee Biillnis: CufiMt Fee Total: OUliog Group Total: BiUieg Groepi CoAvaciO: invr CNOl iO A1I3 S225.100.00 100.00% S225.100.00 S223.974.50 0 SU25.50 $1,125.50 2296 9Lf 296 2|:0I C002.i0*62l ..J CrMp MIMB Toait: I60/C00*i ItOTf Projcec lilS.Ol JaatiMV 25.2002 Plies oT2 Relmbursables Copy Papers 1/2 X11 Delivery Service E^^reH Mail Service! Fax Long Dlst Telephone Cbr|s Mileage/Travel Pottage Reimbunablei Total! 67.95 9.85 3.46 1.50 1J2 38.33 9.60 S137.91 Billing Oioup Tocil: Project Totals: S137.91 Invoice Total ***Sl,2d3.41 ,r ' ’ BilUeg SeaMMry Cuftieni Prior 0 Ian PreftstiefMl Service!S1.125J0 $212,319.47 $213,444.97 RtiniburtaOle expentet:S 137.91 SIS.305.60 S15.443J] Outtide Service!:S0.00 $11.65103 $11,655.03 Oher Sifviect and Peer.S0.00 $0.00 SOM Pinanee Charger S0.00 $0.00 SOM Taxer 80.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total:SI.263.41 S239J80.10 $240.543 J 8XV7 Oiidi JO xxio ZZ96 9L9 296 2P0I COOZ.XO'UJ Bumsvill*, MinnMOta 55337 (952) 894^830 Fax (952) 894>1990 Sfi»daithg In UtentnicU t atemnle AecMt Control Systems lUmitTe: B mIA mms 22071 CMcase,IL0 iMMstMtoim OUR ORDER NO.PAOiNO.ACCTNO.TAKEN BY OATBENTIREO INVOICE NO. 181639 1 LON009 JBS/01/20/03 MN-281472 INVOICfiDATB 01/22/03 A. . I SOLD TO UlTtttllUMS LONG LAKE FIRE 05FT 34U VILLOV DRIVE LONG LAKE MN 35356 cMotUoIrr moMB 612/473-9701 4 SHIR TO. ' •* -.'h . t LONG LAKE FIRE DEPT 340 WILLOW DRIVE LONG LACE MN 55356 ATTN: lERBY P.0.9 R6QJ MKPOR HOWTOBH# WILL CALL BHIBO a TI 01/20/03 TERMS: NET 30 PM WONTN CHMOeo ON PABTOUSACCOUNTO. PLEASE PAY ON THO PIVOICE. NO 07NSISTAIBMBNT WILL BE SENT. Ml^«t SSk feomalonumsm 35-1842918 THIS ORDER HAS MEN BNTSRIO ACCOROINGTO BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS TERMS It* 1 2 3 4 8 6 7 8 SOUACB STK STK STK STK STK STK STK STK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 1 2 26 10 onroNo 2 4 1 2 28 10 UNT aCTHMS PtBouPTieN Revwa 1C7L1-626 7 PIN UNCO KEYED 1A1L1-KS208-KS800 KEY BLANK KEYED KEYED A1 W/4 KEYS 1C7L1-626 7 PIN UNCO KEYED 1A1L1-KS20S-KS600 KEY BLANK KEYED KEYED A2 W/2 KEYS 1C7L1-626 7 PIN UNCO KEYED 1A1L1-KS208-KS600 KEY BLANK KEYED KEYED A3 W/10 KEYS 1A1L1-KS2084CS600 KEY BLANK KEYED CONTROL KEY 1E72-S2-RP-626 STANDARD R LESS CORE PERM CORES KENDELL«8199 2002 ACCD .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 16.93 OATG CUUMS FOR BNONTASE MUST BE BIAM WITMN 10 OAVB AFTER RECBPT OP 6000B. MMCNANOISC MUSTNOr URCTURNEO WITHOUT A RETURN GOODS iklPolXki NambilMimM.MwNalVPNGNMMOMipplaiBoninw«ieoniply »!»I iN BolNy BuMiig Cotm mrl OomStf A cbo m !■*•. 0 It Bn puitAMw iMponNbWy ib iNWpoBlWBIIIwJBliNoaURBPBmulllHNl^SMI)dMA dOAiiiQorn^ TintsfiififiT cm loinwiyicuav mmBcPMTsn !SUB TOTAL 16.93 t %TAX 1.62 SHiPPMOAND HANOUMQCHAmiS 6.00 2TM9 lOJUBD IfXTK M kMtnm An MtmD wmm 9B maionL TO’A. :26.S5 Of mnoBM cwm (HbOIMALMVOlCE V AMOUNT .00 .00 .90 .00 .00 .00 I .00 16S3 100/100*4 IlOIi 2)IVT ONOl iO All3 ZZ96 9Lf Z90 ZT^OX COOZ.lO'Sii ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ................ 24 2005 CITYOFOflowo Date; 02/18/03 Item No: f 6 Department Approval ; jAdministrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Name: Title: Kurt Erickson Sergeant r> Item Description: Purchase of 2003 squad cars Exhibits: DISCUSSION; Council authorized a letter of intent to be signed with Superior Ford last October for 3 new 2003 Ford Crown Victoria Squad cars. The ■*olice department has been notified that the cars are expected to be delivered on or about March 1 ,2003. The cost of each car is $23,386 (state bid pricing). In an effort to reduce maintenance cost an extended warrant was purchased for $1,800 per car. The strip down of the old cars and set up of the new cars will be $2,887.20 per car. This includes transferring of the radios, lights, computers, and security screen. The graphics for the exterior will cost $312 per car. The total expenditure will be $85,155.60 plus applicable tax and incidental charges. The current car being driven by the Chief of Police and two of the cars being stripped dow n w ill be sold through a public bidding process. This is the same process the police department has used the last several years. One of the cars being stripped w ill be set up to be used as an unmarked car for the Chief of Police. The cost to set this car up for unmarked operation is e.xpected to be about $2,200. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED; Motion to approve acceptance of the new cars from Superior Ford, offer and sell the old cars through competitive bidding, and set up the new cars. r REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: February 24,2003 ITEM NO: / 7 Department Approval: Name Tom Kuehn Title Finance Director Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Bid Award for Equipment CertiGcates Sale - Resolution The 2003 General Fund Budget includes expenditures for police vehicle replacements. Because the City’s property tax levy is at the levy limit, the source of a portion of funding for the equipment replacement was limited to either the use of General Fund reserves or the use of Equipment Certificates, which is a short term note. Because the City’s General Fund reserves are at a minimal level, equipment certificates are being used to fund the vehicle replacement expenditures. The City has requested bids from six local banks for a one-year equipment certificate note in the amount of $75,000. Since the bid deadline was set for Friday, February 21,2003 at 4:30 p.m., a bid tabulation and resolution to award the equipment certificate to the low bidder will be provided at the Council meeting. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt Resolution #A Resolution Awarding the Sale of $75,000 General Ooligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 2003, accepting the bid proposal of Anchor Bank, N.A., Wayzata, to purchase the certificates bearing an interest rate of 1.40% per annum at a bid price of par plus accrued interest, if any, to be dated March 17,2003. Woed PtffMrTo«M«na4.'4iuKil AoiaaM»'f4ui,C<i1 Me apd 4 BID TABULATION $7S,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 2001 City of Orono, MN Sale: February 24,2003 AWARD: Anchor Bank, N.A. NAME OF BIDDER RATE YEAR PRICE ; ANCHOR BANK, N.A. Wayzata, MN STATE BANK OF LONG LAKE Long Lake, MN FARMERS STATE BANK OF HAMEL Hamel, MN BANK OF MAPLE PLAIN Maple Plain, MN CROW RIVER BANK Delano, MN WeriMRtTinri60.C«.lnMi.^jBid_TahiUM »pd 1.40% 1.50% 2.00% FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF THE LAKES NO BID Navarre, MN NO BID NO BID 2004 2004 2004 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the City Council of the City of Orono Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall in the City, on Monday, Febniary 24, 2003 at 7:00 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: and the following were absent: A The Mayor announced that the meeting was convened for the purpose of considering a proposal for the purchase of $75,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 2003. Member moved its adoption: introduced the following written resolution and RESOLUTION AWARDING SALE OF $75,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION EQUIPMENT CERTinCATES OF INDEBTEDNESS, SERIES 2003, FIXING THE FORM AND SPECIFICATIONS THEREOF, PROVIDING FOR THEIR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY, AND LEVYING TAXES FOR THEIR PAYMENT follows: BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, as I. The proposal of Anchor Bank, N.A. to purchase the S75,000 General Obligation Equipment Certiflcates of Indebtedness, Series 2003 of the City is hereby found and determined to be a favorable proposal and shall be and is hereby accepted, said proposal being to purchase Certificates bearing interest at the rate of 1.40% and at a price of 575,000 plus accrued interest. 2. To provide funds for the purpose of purchasing public safety vehicles pursuant to the authority of Section 412.301 and Chapter 475, Minnesota Statutes, the City shall forthwith issue its negotiable General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 2003 (the “Certificates”) in the aggregate principal amount of $75,000, to be dated March 17, 2003, to mature on March 17,2004, to bear interest at the rate of 1.40% per annum, payable on September 17,2003 and at maturity on March 17,2004. All Certificates are without option of prior payment. 3. The Certificates, the Registrar ’s Authentication Certificate and the form of assignment and on the reverse side thereof shall be in substantially the following form: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO No. R-l S75,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATE OF INDEBTEDNESS, SERIES 2002 Interest Rate 1.40% Maturity March 17,2004 Date of Original Issue March 17,2003 Registered Owner: Anchor Bank, N.A. Principal Amount: Seventy-five Thousand Dollars The City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the Registered Owner specified above, or registered assigns, without option of prior payment, the Principal Amount specified above on the Maturity Date specified above, upon the presentation and surrender hereof, and to pay to the Registered Owner hereof interest on such principal sum at the interest rate specified above from March 17,2003 from the date hereof or the most recent interest payment date to which interest was provided to the date of maturity. Principal is payable in lawful money of the United States of America at the office of the Orono Finance Director, in Orono, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar or of its successor as Bond Registrar designated by the City upon 60 days’ notice to the registered owners at their registered addresses. Interest shall be paid on September 17,2003 and at maturity on March 17,2004 by check or draft mailed to the registered owners. This Certificate constitutes an issue of Certificates in the aggregate principal amount of $75,000, issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the Constitution and Laws of the State of Minne.sota, including Section 412.301 and Chapter 475, Minnesota Statutes, for the purpose of providing funds for purchasing certain equipment. This Certificate constitutes a general obligation of the City and to provide moneys for the prompt and full payment of said principal and interest as the same become due the full faith and credit of the City is hereby irrevocably pledged, and the City will levy ad valorem ta.xes, if required for such purpose, without limitation as to rate or amount. This Certificate is transferable, as provided by the Resolution of the City Council authorizing the issuance of the Certificates of this series adopted February 24,2003 (the “Bond Resolution”) only upon books of the City kept at the oftlce of the Bond Registrar by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner’s duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate for transfer at the office of the Bond Registrar, duly endorsed by, or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer in form satisfactory to the Bond Registrar duly executed by, the registered owner hereof or the owner’s duly authorized attorney, and, upon payment of any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer, one or more fully registered Certificates of the series of the same principal amount, maturity and interest rate will be issued to the designated transferee or transferees. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to happen and to be I* performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Certificate have been done, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form, time and manner a > required by law and that this Certificate, together with all other indebtedness of the City outstanding on the date of its issuance, does not exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation of indebtedness. This Certificate shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose until the Certificate of Authentication and Registration hereon shall have been signed by the Bond Registrar. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Orono, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Certificate to be executed in its behalf by the manual or facsimile signature of the Mayor and by the manual or facsimile signature of the City Clerk, all as of the Date of Original Issue specified above. Dated: March 17,2003 Mayor City Clerk Bond Registrar’s Certificate of Authentication and Registration This is one of the Certificates described in the within mentioned Bond Resolution, and this Certificate has been registered as to principal and interest in the name of the Registered Owner identified above on the registration books of the City of Orono, Minnesota. ORONO FINANCE DIRECTOR Bond Registrar Authorized Signature ..Mm f ASSIGNMENT unto FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers (Please Print or T>pewrite Name and Address of Transferee) the within Certificate and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints_______________to transfer the within Certificate on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: Please Insen Social Security Number or Other Identifying Number of Assignee Assignee Notice: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears on the face of this Certificate in every panicular, without alteration or any change whatever. Signature Guaranteed: Signatures must be guaranteed by a national bank or tnist company or by a brokerage firm having membership in one of the major stock exchanj^es. 4. The Certificates shall be payable upon presentation at the office of the Orono Finance Director, in Orono, Minnesota, as Registrar and Paying Agent, or at the offices of such other successor agents as the City may hereafter designate upon 60 days ’ mailed notice to the registered owners at their registered addresses. Interest shall be paid by check or draft of the Registrar mailed to the registered owners at their addresses shown on the registration books on each interest payment date unless other arrangements satisfactory to the Bond Registrar the City and the registered owners of Certificates are made. The City shall deposit funds w ith the Bond Registrar at the time and in the manner necessary to provide for the full and prompt payment of such principal and interest. j 5. The Certificates shall be prepared under the direction of the City Clerk and when so prepared shall be executed on behalf of the City by the manual or facsimile signature of the Mayor and by the manual or facsimile signature of the City Clerk. The Certificates shall not be valid for any purpose until authenticated by the Bond Registrar. The Bond Registrar is authorized and directed to register the Certificates initially issued hereunder in such names as the purchaser may direct. The Certificates initially issued hereunder shall be registered as of March 17.2003, and all Certificates issued in exchange therefor shall be registered as of such date. When the Certificates shall have been so prepared and executed, they shall be delivered by the City Clerk in exchange for the purchase price and upon receipt of the signed legal opinion of Facgre & Benson LLP, and the purchaser shall not be required to see to the proper application of the proceeds. The Certificates shall be in the denomination of SI,000 each or any multiple thereof 6. As long as any of the Certificates issued hereunder shall remain outstanding, the City shall maintain and keep at the office of the Bond Registrar an office or agency for the payment of the principal of and interest on such Certificates, os in this Resolution provided, and for the registration and transfer of such Certificates, and shall also keep at said office of the Bond Registrar books for such registration and transfer. 7. As to any Certificate, the City and the Bond Registrar and their respective successors, each in its discretion, may deem and treat the person in whose name the same for the time being shall be registered as the absolute owner thereof for all purposes and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar nor their respective successors shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. Payment of or on account of the principal or interest of any such Certificate shall be made only to or upon the order of the registered owner thereof, but such registration may be changed as above provided. All such payments shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon such Certificate to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. 8. There is hereby created a separate debt service fund for the Certificates, which shall be held by the Treasurer and used for no other purpose than to pay said Certificates, provided, that if any payment thereon shall become due when there is not sufficient money in said fund to pay the same, the Treasurer shall make such payment from the general fund of the City, and said general fund shall be reimbursed for such advances out of the proceeds of taxes levi^ pursuant hereto or other monej-s appropriated by the City Council for such purpose. Inio said debt ser\ ice fund shall be paid all proceeds of the taxes heretofore levied for this purpose and such other moneys as may be received by the City for the purpose of or appropriated to the pa>ment of the Certificates. r It is hereby found and determined that the taxes previously levied in the amount of $75,000, if collected in full, together with funds appropriated therefor, will produce at least five percent in excess of the amount needed to meet when due the payments on the Certificates. 9. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the purchaser and to the attorneys approving the Certificates, certified copies of all proceedings and records relating to the issuance of said General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 2003 and to the right, power and authority of the City and its officers to issue tlie same, and said certified copies and certificates shall be deemed the representations of the City as to all matters stated therein. 10. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Secretary of the Treasury a statement meeting the information reporting requirements of Section 149(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), by the 15th day of the second calendar month after the close of the calendar quarter in which the Certificates are issued. 11. The City shall not take or permit any action that would cause the Certificates to be “private activity bonds” within the meaning of Section 141 of the Code. The City shall comply with the rebate requirements imposed under Section 148(0 of the Code and regulations thereunder, including (if applicable) the requirement to make periodic calculations of the amount subject to rebate thereunder and the requirement to make all required rebates to the United States. The City Clerk of the City is hereby authorized to make on behalf of the City all elections that he may deed necessary and expedient under Section 148 of the Code. In addition, the City shall make no investment of funds that would cause the Certificates to be “arbitrage bonds” within the meaning of Section 148 of the Code and regulations thereunder. All terms used in this paragraph 11 shall have the meanings provided in the Code and regulations thereunder. 12. The City Clerk shall furnish a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, and obtp*n the County Auditor's certificate as required by law. 13. The Certificates are designated as “qualified tax exempt obligations” for purposes of Section 265(1))(3) of the Code. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member _________________upon vote being taken thereon the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. f f.f.- 4 r STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO SS. I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Orono, Minnesota, hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City held Februaiy 24,2003 with the original thereof on file and of record in my office and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to the issuance and sale of $75,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 2003 of said City. WITNESS My hand officially and the seal of the City this____of February, 2003. City Clerk City of Orono, Minnesota (Seal) Ml 96113} 02 Rcio<onl\btd atf^mrd for equip ceft.doc 8 f Crt#*•#•»* • ^TfSjO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION F£B 2 4100} CITYOFORONO DATE: February 20,2003 ITEM NO: // Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item Description: 2002/2003/2004 Police Sergeant Contract Settlement The Police Sergeant employee group had been a non-union group until they formed a bargaining unit in 2002. This required the negotiation of a new contract, which included a number of issues related to preserving the City’s management rights and authoi ity, as well as the economic issues such as pay and benefits. We have now reached a settlement which does provide the language necessary to preserve the City’s management rights and authority’, and also provides pay and l^nefit adjustments consistent with the City’s other employee groups, and with the market. The key elements of the settlement are as follows: £ay 2002: 3.75% increase/same as provided to other City employee groups) 2003: An increase sufficient to provide a 9% differential between the top Police Sergeant pay rate and the top Police Officer pay rate. The generally accepted differential in the market is 10%. The current differential is 7.75%. Because the Police Officers received a 3% pay increase for 2003, the Police Sergeant pay increase required to provide a 9% differential in 2003 is 4.25%. 2004: An increase sufficient to provide a 10% differential between the top Police Sergeant pay rate and the top Police Officer pay rate. Insurance Contribution 2002: Increase from $410 per month to $460.00 per month (same as other City employee groups) 2003: $500.00 per month (same as other City employee groups) 2004: Re-opener Premium Holidays (holidays for which time worked is paid at one and one-halftimes the regular pay rate) 2002: Five premium holiday s(same as Police Officers) 2003: Seven premium holidays 2004: Seven premium holidays Call Back Time. Court Standby Pav. and lniur\ on Duty Pav These are the same as received by the Police Officers(please see the attached language) Employer Authority The Employer Authority language is as follows: “The Employer retains the full and unrestricted right to operate and manage ail manpower, facilities, and equipment: to establish functions and programs; to set and amend budgets; to determine the utilization of technology; to establish and modify the organizational structure; to select, direct, and ! , I r detemiine the number of personnel; to establish work schedules, and to perform any inherent managerial function not specifically established or modified by this Agreement. Any term or condition of employment not specifically established or modified by this Agreement shall remain solely within the discretion of the Employer to modify, establish, or eliminate.” COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the 2002/2003/2004 Police Sergeant contract settlement as reflected above, and to authorize the City Administrator to prepare and sign a contract reflecting the settlement. iT % i .'ll r CALL BACK TIME An employee who is called to duty during his scheduled off-duty time shall receive a minimum of hvo (2) hours pay at one and one-half (1-1/2) times Jthe employee's base pay rate. An extension or early report to a regularly scheduled shift for duty does not qualify the employee for the hvo (2) hour mimmum. COURT STANDBY TIME If an officer is placed on standby for court during the officer's scheduled off-duty time, and if the court appearance is cancelled the day of the court date, the officer will receive standby pay in the amount of hvo (2) hours of pay at the officer's regular pay rate. If the employee owes time to the City the straight time standby will be subtracted from the balance owed. If the employee does not owe the City time, the employee will receive two (2) hours of pay at the regular rate. As an alternative, upon mutual agreement and if within the compensatory time accumulation maximum, the employee may receive two (2) hours of compensatory time at the straight time rate. INJURY ON DUTY Employees injured during the performance of their duties for the EMPLOYER and thereby rendered unable to work for the EMPLOYER will be paid the difference beUveen the employee's regular pay and Worker’s Compensation insurance payments for a period not to exceed ninety (90) working days per injury, not charged to the employee ’s vacation, sick leave, or other accumulated leave, or other accumulated paid benefits, after a three (3) working day initial waiting period per injury. The three (3) day working day waiting period shall be charged to the employee's sick leave account less Worker’s Compensation insurance. mi r REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION FEB 2 4 2005 CITYOFORONO DATE: February 20,2003 ITEM NO: I Dcpartraent Approval: Naaic RonMoorse Titk City Administrator ■ Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Designation of City Representative to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) The MCWD is going to be addressing matters of interest to Orono at its February 27 meeting, particularly the Mn/DOT permit application for the Highway 12 Project. Because the Orono City Council and staff will be participating in a housing workshop at the same time as the MCWD meeting, it is necessary to designate an official representative of the City to attend the MCWD meeting. Because Gabriel Jabbour has been working closely with both the MCWD and Mn/DOT regarding the Highway 12 Project permit, it is recommended that Gabriel be designated as the City’s official representative. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to designate Gabriel Jabbour as the City’s official representative to represent the City’s interests in relation to the Mn/DOT permit application for the Highway 12 Project, and regarding other issues of interest to the City that may be addressed at the February 27 MCWD meeting. I ifffiM imi iiinhni inraMatiUHriMmttittlilamiaiim ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date:02/21/03 Item No: FEB 2 4 2003 CITY OF ORONO Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name: Title: Kurt Erickson Sergeant Item Description: Upgrade and Moving of Oxygen System Exhibits: DISCUSSION! The police department has kept a cascade system to fill oxygen bottles for emergency medical response in the old Long Lake fire station. The system needs to be moved to the new Long Lake fire station. The current system is old and does not meet current OSIIA or FDA guidelines. I have spoken to Minneapolis Oxygen Company. They sent a representative out to look at the existing system and proposed an upgrade that will meet OSHA and FDA requirements for filling the oxygen bottles. This system is used jointly by Orono Police and Long Lake Fire. It has historically been maintained by the police as we arc the greater user’s of the system. The fire department has contributed the space. The cost to do the upgrade and make the system compliant is not expected to exceed $650. Minneapolis Oxygen Company is the provider of the bulk oxygen for the city and has provided good ser>'icc to us in the past. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: A motion to appro\ e the spending of not more than $650 to move and upgrade the oxygen cascade system from the old Long Lake fire station to the new Long Lake fire station by Minneapolis Oxygen Company and to amend the police department budget to reflect the expediturc. # REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION FEB 2 4 2003 cmr OF oflONo DATE: February 24,2003 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Lin Vee Title Ciy CleA Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Licenses Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval KENNEL LICENSE 1.Robin A. Kilbane 495 Oxford Road 4.Gayle Talbot 80 Luce Line Ridge 2.Dennis & Gail Wilder 1331 North Arm Drive 3.Chris & Erin Tully 1355 North Ann Drive SPECIAL EVENT 2.Applicant: Event: Location: Date: Time: Peter Erpenbach / Minnesota Distance Running Association Fred Kurz Memorial 10 Mile Run Wayzata Middle School to Luce Line Trail - Approximately 4.5 miles out and back Saturday, April 12,2003 8:30 a.m. -11:30 a.m. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve/deny the above listed licenses. ^NNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Owner;_ kiptO^ H l<J M/) Property Address; ft) JjCi/ liling Address (if differem): f hone; (home)^^^ *.•^7 RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Feej^^s.o^ (payment must accompany application)^ M95cx+nf?.'X oronD “ ^53 0( (work)_l^^ C AVr V? * . r * !7 *•■ >•7 V i'V/; MaximumNo. ofdogsto be kept at one time; 3 (over 6 months of age) -------- Principal Breed; LoOb_____ Purpose for more than 2 dogs; iiE:SOUPri . Dogs normally kept; ^l^inside kennel structure COMMERCIAL Kennel License Fee; $150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business;_ Business Activities; Notm.1 Business Hours';^'" After Hours Contact; (name) (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are;____inside___outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the O specified on this form; the undersiVned acknn^irrT Council for a Kennel License as does not grant any authority to violate anv nrovV* kenwl license is permissive only and license approval and at any other rilso^^^^ per^ssion to ^pecl the premises prior to agrees to abide by the requirements of Municinai^n?* hcense duration; and the undersigned condicions taposed by .h. City Council as par, of any kcLl £c ap“ Applicant l-]b-03 Date For City Il.tp nntv. Kennel inspected by Recommends: Appr^l ^ Denial Dat e D./S--07 cmroFORONO INSPECTION NOTICE PERMIT NO.______ CALUOIN SCHEOUIEO COMPLETED DATE TIME Q’ /T- i ADDRESS__Ov T.vr;» § DESCRIPTION 01 FOOTING 02 FRAMING 03 INSULATION 04 WAUBD. 05 FINAL 07 0EMO>S(TE 07 DEMO-FINAL 09 PLUMBING Rl 10 PLUMBING FINAL It mechanical Rl 13 mechanical FINAL 24/25 WOODBURNER/FIREPLACE 12 WATER HOOK-UP 14 SEWER HOOK-UP 27 SEPTIC MAINT. 15 SEPTIC INSTALL. 23 SEPTIC FINAL 18 EXCAV/GRADINO/FILLINO 1® IAKESHOREAIVETLANOS 34 TREE REMOVAL 17 SITE INSPECTION 06 PROGRESS 21 COMPLAINT 22 FOaOW-UP 35 HARO COVER REMOVAL 36 FOUNOATIONmEMOVALO'^NOWCONTRACTORTOIIEETVOO:__YES___NO ---------------------------------^'0. O WORK SATISFACTORY PROCEED a CORRECT WORK 6 PROCEED O project COMPLETE D ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY ---------- temporary ° ®°"S^Lii5!^®®^“TIONWITHlN,____HOURS INSPECTOR WILL RETURN -PERMANENT O STOP ORDER POSTED. CALL INSPECTOR Q inspection required . CAU to ARRANGE ACCESS. O PHOTO TAKEN □ CITATION ISSUED Call for the next lnsft^tl|!h 24 Owner/Contra ^ Inspector .mh White CopyAntptcl 952) 249-4600 C*n«ry C«py/SI|« NoIlM KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January 1,200_to December 31,200__ Owner: % ii~eJ /yC^/y/Aj'Z^ Property Address:SS^ (include city and zip) Mailing Address (if different): ______________________________ Phone: (home ) ^5 Z ?_____(work ) A/2 - ^ 75"^ RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Fee: $25.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time: ^_________ (over 6 mo^t^ of age) ^ ^ Principal Breedf^//jt^ ! Purpose for more than 2 dogs: _ (. Dogs normally kept:insiinside kennel smicmre COMMERCIAL Kennel License Fee: $150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business: Business Activities: (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours: _____________ __ After Hours Contact: (name) (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are: inside___^outside __both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigned hereby grants Ae City permission to inspect the premises prior to .license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. Applicant Date i r * cmroFORONo INSPECTION NOTICE PERMIT NO.______ DATE ADDRESS CAUEDIN SCHEDULED COMPLETED TIME 7 33/ M. flg. OWNEAriqiini S. rf Aa// UJi u: I 5 i TELEPHONE NO. C tCL iI DESCRIPTION __ 01 FOOTMO 03 PRAMMO 03 INSULATION 04 WAUBO. 05 FINAL 07 DEMO-SITE 07 DEMO-PINAL 00 PLUMBING n “^^iP-Msao ns&n 11 MECNAMCALM 13 MECHANICAL FINAL 24/25 WOOO BURNER/FIREPLACE 13 WATER HOOK-UP 14 SEWER HOOK-UP 27 SEPTIC MAINT. 15 SEPTIC INSTALL. 18 EXCAV/QRAOmO/FILlJNa 19 LAKESHORCWETLANOS 34 TREE REMOVAL 17 SITE INSPECTION 06 PROGRESS 21 COMPLAINT 22 FOUOW-UP 35 HARD COVER REMOVAL 36 FOUNDATIONIREMOVAL Is; 23 SEPTIC FINAL 10 PLUMBING FINAL OWNERICONTRACTORTO MEET YOU:__YES___NO COMMENTS: S^u rrinrk Hno I ) ci> !y ^j'TsL 4ian ? O-fvpiY ou-^. a WORK satisfactory ; proceed O correct WORKS PROCEED □ CORRECT WORK. CAU FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING O CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN INSPECTOR Wia RETURN HOURS. Q PROJECT COMPLETE □ BSUE CERTIFICATE OF occupancy ---------.temporary -------------- PERMANENT □ STOP ORDER POSTED. CALL INSPECTOR O IMSPECnON REQUIRED. CAU TO ARRANGE ACCESS. □ PHOTO TAKEN □ CITATION ISSUED Call for th« next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249>4600 Owner/Contra^oron site: Inspector wtili* CopyUntpwloiii Plla CmaryCepjrlSitt Nolle* ( KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January 1,200__ to December 31, 200__ Owner; ^l^yi cr <3^ i') PropertyA^ress: fj Atii'l fU^ /f)K\ (include city and zip) Mailing Address (if different):^________________________________ Phone: (home)_^^j^ if (work) RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Fee: $25.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time; . j (over 6 months of age) Principal Breed; Purpose for more than 2 dogs: U14- ^ Dogs normally kept: y inside____kennel structure (DaymentmiiSi(payment miiS^accp,mpany application) Name of Business: Business Activities: Normal Business Hours: (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, reuil, etc.) After Hours Contact: (name) (phone) N Dog runs/exercise areas are:____inside___^outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigned hereby grants the City permission to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. Applicant Date * ' For City Use Onlv Kennel inspected by Recommends: Appfdval >>< Denial Date (I ‘-<1 cmroFORONo inspection notice PERMIT wo. • CALLEOm SCNEOULEO OOMPLETEO DATE TIME ADDRESS OWNER <- TELEPHONE NO.______9*52. - U - (./ rNTR._ ii: {j; § DESCRIPTION 01 FOOTINO 02 FRAMING 03 INSULATION 04 WAUBO. 03 FINAL OT OEMO-SITE 07 DEMO-FINAL 09 PLUM8INQRI 10 PLUMBING FINAL . j crr> MECHANIC Pt ___________11 MECHANICAL Rl 13 MECHANICAL FINAL 24/25 WOOD burner /fireplace 12 WATER HOOK-UP 14 SEWER HOOK-UP 27 SEPTIC MAINT. 15 SEPTIC mSTALL. 23 SEPTIC FINAL ^ ------------- . 5 OWNEWCONTRACTORTOMEETVOU:__YES___NO g COMMENTS: ■^3/23 1« aCAV/ORAOINO/FILLINO ’> LAKESHOREAVETIANOS 34 TREE REMOVAL 17 SITE INSPECTION 06 PROGRESS 21 COMPLAINT 22 FOaOW-UP 35 HARO COVER REMOVAL 33 F0UNDATK)N«EM0VAL ^ □ WORK SATISFACTORT. PROCEED 14, □ CORRECT WORKS PROCEED a CORRECT UNSAFE CX)NOfTlONVWTHIN INSPECTOR Wia RETURN HOURS. □ STOP ORDER POSTED. CALL INSPECTOR O INSPECTION REOi^RED. CALL TO ARRANGE ^rCFSS. □ PROJECT complete □ ISSJE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY -------------^TEMPOR^nv ---------—PERMANi 4T D PHOTOTAKEN □ CITATION ISSUED o *** "*** ho^ln^dva^ (952) 249-4600 *•*••• cowiii»»p*etert Fa*CMowyCopy^toNedc* KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January 1,200__ to December 31,200_ Owner: VgAV-C^ Property Address: Lv->r ^ C v<Ng> ______________ (include city and zip) Mailing Address (if different):______________________________________——— C^\\i Phone: (home ) (wortc ) Cr^va. ♦ -OiVStVU. RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Fee: $25.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time:^_____ (over 6 months of age) Principal Breed: ^ V^gy-rt?vfC»‘\ Purpose for more than 2 dogs:__J^_________ . Dogs normally kept: \/^inside___tennel structure COMMERCIAL Kennel License Fee: $150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business:___________ Business Activities:____________________________________ (example: boarding, breeding, veterinaiy care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours:_________ _______________ After Hours Contact: (name) (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigned hereby grants the City permission to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by the City Council as pan of any kennel license approval. Date For City Use Onlv Kennel inspected by Recommends: Appro^l__Denial^ <Xr> C.Dale “J - o y 1 § 2 2 Ui J2 I I U jI OTYOFORONO INSPECTION NOTICE PERMIT NO. CAUEOIN SCHEDULED COMPLETED DATE TIME Bn Lute L<r>FADDRESS ___________________ OWNER ^a.cj|e lalhrtf ftftMTP TELEPHONEN q(h ^9 ^MlZ-SS(/>Z ( Lrl ^-599-01 DESCRiraOM I L_| CC-rvOX—. 2 Q 01 FOOTINQ 11 MECHANICALRI IS EXCAV/QRADING/FILLINQ 02 FRAMeiO 13 MECHANICAL FINAL 19 LAKESHOREWVETIANOS 03 INSULATION 24/25 WOOD BURNER/FIREPIACE 34 TREE REMOVAL 04 WAUBO.12 WATER HOOK-UP 17 SITE INSPECTION OS FINAL 14 SEWER HOOK-UP OS PROGRESS 07 OEMO-SITE 27 SEPTIC MAINT.21 COMPLAINT 07 DEMO-FINAL IS SEPTIC INSTAU.22 FOLLOW-UP 09 PLUMBING Rl 23 SEPTIC FINAL 39 HARO COVER REMOVAL 10 PLUMBING FINAL 30 FOUNOATIONAIEMOVAL OWNEWCOMTRACTORTOMEETyOU:__YU___NO COMMENTS: IP, i.iro t-iA^ W/vi /OV, ^/05 ^/OU □ WORKSAnSFACTOfTft PROCEED □ OOnflECTWORKAPHOCEED □ COfWECTMORK,CAU FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE OA^ERINO O CORRECT UNSAFE CONOfTION WITHIN_____HOUfS. INSPECTOR WILL RETURN O PROIECT COMPLETE O ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUWUiCY -------------TEMPORARY ________PERMANENT i Q STOP ORDER POSTED. CAU INSPECTOR □ INSPECTION REOUIREa CAU TO ARRANGE ACCESS. □ PHOTOTAKEN □ CITATION ISSUED Call for tho noxt inspection 24 hours in advsneo. (952) 249*4600 OwnBf/ContfacjOfon«H^^x«^ inspector: i ; Wtrtf CopyHwipMClof*! FMo CwMryCopyORtliotiM CITY OF ORONO SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT Date Issued: Date of Event: February 25,2003 Saturday, April 12,2003 Time:8:30 a.m. • 11:30 a.m. Name of Person(s) And/or Organization Sponsoring this Event: Peter Erpenbach Minnesota Distance Running Association 5701 Normandale Boulevard Edina, MN 55424 Phone:952-927-0983 Location of Event: Wayzata Middle School to Luce Line Trail - approximately 4.5 miles out and back Type of Event: Fred Kurz Memorial 10 Mile Run (approximately 75 participants) The following documents are required and on file at the City Administrative Offices: • Certific ite of General Liability Insurance • Permit from DNR for use of Luce Line Trail • Approv.ll from Orono Police Department The following conditions have been placed on this event: • This special event permit is subject to immediate revocation by the Orono Police Department upon violation of any City Ordinances or identification of hazards to safety of the public. • Applicant must provide enough volunteers to direct runners.'trafiic at intersection roads along the race route. • Applicant must provide first aid to the runners. Approved at City Council meeting on: February 24,2003 (City Seal) Ronald J. Moorse, City Administrator 2750 Kelley Parkway. P.O. Box 66. Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone: 952-249-4600 / Fax: 952-249-4616 / wrww.ci.orono.tnn.us EBSt ^ - j; Ch«ck HumlMf EmployM Itemt Pay Pariod 052422 DODGE. RACHEL M. 052423 LESKINEN. DENISE M. 052424 MOORSE.ROt4ALDJ. 052425 VEE. LINDAS. 052426 KUEHN. THOMAS M. 052443 VOID 052439 VOID 052434 VOID 052437 VOID 052438 VOID 052436 VOID 052435 VOID 052448 VOID 052447 VOID 052446 VOID 052427 OLSON. RONALD J. 052444 VOID 052442 VOID 052441 VOID 052440 VOID 052428 VOID 052429 VOID 052430 VOID 052431 VOID 052432 VOID 052433 VOID 052445 VOID 052449 PETTIT. SANDRA K. 052450 ANDERSON. BRUCE L 052451 BOB2IEN.SUEA. 052452 BORIS. SCOTT W. 052453 BUDIG. STACIE M. 052454 CARLSON. MICHAEL B 052455 CORNICK. JAMES L 052456 DEMBOUSKI. JAY C. 052457 ERICKSON. KURT R 052458 FARNIOK. CORREY L 052459 FISCHENICH.DANT. 052460 FISCHER. CHRISTOPHER K 052461 GOOD. STEPHANY R 052462 HENDRICKS. RONALD J. 052463 JOHNSON. JEFFREY 052464 MADSON. ADRIENNE M. 052465 MCNICHOLS. DAVID L 052466 MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES 052467 PERSELL. WILLIAM R. 052468 SCHOENHOFF. JOHN B 052469 TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F. 052470 TOMCZYK.MARKW. 052471 WITTKE. ANTHONY A. 052472 ARNESON. JOSHUA A. 052473 HERMAN. JOHN R 052474 LEE. JOSEPH P 052475 BOLTERMAN. MATTHEW A. 052476 BOTTENBERG. WENDY C. 052477 CHAPUT. JENNIFER L 052478 GAFFRON. MICHAEL P. 052479 GAPPA.GREGORYA. 052480 MEYER. WILLIAM C CITY OF ORONO chock ragistor 02/18/0311:40 AM Page 1 Chacic ChKk Amoufit Data Check Statin $1,020.13 2/19/03 Outstanding $851.88 2/19/03 Outstanding $12.18 2/19A)3 OuUUnding $1,229.96 2/19/03 Outstanding $1,014.46 2/19/03 Outetanding $0.00 2/19/03 Void $0.00 2/19/03 Void $0.00 2/19/03 Void $0.00 2/19/03 Void $0.00 2/19/03 Void $0 00 2/19A)3 Void $0.00 2/19/03 Void $0.00 2/19K)3Void $0.00 2/19/03 Void $0.00 2/19A)3 Void $126.32 2/19/03 Outstanding $0.00 2/19/03 Void $0.00 2/19/03 Void $0.00 2/19/03 Void $0.00 2/19A)3Void $0.00 2/19/03 Void $0.00 2/19A)3 Void $0.00 2/19/03 Void $0.00 2/19A)3 Void $0.00 2/19/03 Void $0.00 2/19/03 Void $0.00 2/19A)3 Void $47941 2/19/03 Outstanding $1,383.14 2/19A)3 Outetanding $86300 2/19/03 Outetanding $1,389.43 2/19/03 Outetanding $707 88 2/19/03 Outetanding $26346 2/19/03 Outetanding $1,371.45 2/19/03 Outetanding $1.465 33 2/19/03 Outstanding $1.528 42 2/19/03 Outetanding $1.559 46 2/19/03 Outstanding $1,424 18 2/19/03 Outstanding $94 62 2/19/03 Outstanding $1,877.33 2/19/03 Outetanding $1,182 94 2/19/03 Outstanding $1.448 68 2/19/03 Outetanding $584 63 2/19/03 Outstanding $57029 2/19/03 Outstanding $1.60167 2/19/03 Outetanding $224 49 2/19/03 Outetanding $1.462 62 2/19/03 Outetanding $44553 2/19/03 Outetanding $1.395 12 2/19/03 Outetanding $1,321.59 2/19/03 Outstanding $40642 2/19/03 Outetanding $845 58 2/19/03 Outetanding $28168 2/19/03 Outstanding $1.042 00 2/19/03 Outetandiog $1.36341 2/19/03 Outetanding $1.196 81 2/19/03 Outetanding $1.398 84 2/19/03 Outetanding $1,706.74 2/19/03 OutetarKfing $699.05 2/19/03 Outetanding 2 4 2m ciryoFofiog^ CITY OF ORONO 02/1M>311:40 AM Pag* 2 check regieter f • Chtcli Numbf Empioy—Nam# Pay PaHod Cfiack Amount 052461 052462 052463 052464 052465 052466 052467 0524li6 052469 052400 052491 052492 052493 052494 OMAN. LYIE E. VANO. BRUCE L BRINKHAUS. JOHN F. DEBAERE. DONALD L GREGORY. JAMES D. HANSEN. STEVEN 06ERAIGNER. SCOTT G. OBRIEN. RANDY L PALMER. GREGORY A. RATHBUN. BARRY J. SKREEN. DALES. JENSEN. RODNEY W. ROSS. JOHN A. STEFFENHAGEN. RONALD $197.74 $1,299.96 $1,372.67 $1,051.45 $1,040.64 $1,044.42 $660.76 $969.10 $750.94 $1.269.0J $1,092.60 $30.73 $74.41 $1,362.54 $50,097.54 Cfiack Data Chadc Stalua 2/19/03 Outstandkig 2/19/03 Outstanding 2/19m Outstandkig 2/19m Outstandkig 2/19m Outstanding 2/19/03 Outstandkig 2/19/03 OutstarKflng 2/19/03 Outstanding 2/19m Outstanding 2/19/03 Outstanding 2/19/03 Outstanding 2/19/03 Outstanding 2/19/03 Outstanding 2/19/03 OutstaiW 'H) i. ---- CITY OF ORONO Check Detail Register® 02/19/03 8 38 AM Page 1 FEBRUARY 2003 Check Amt Invoice Commefit 10100 Primary Ceeh Paid Chk# 075407 2/1 9A)3 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION G 101-21711 Credit Union Tout CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION $10,685 00 SAVINGS W/H & TRANSFERRED Paid Chk# 075408 2/19/03 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES G 101-21701 Federal Withholding $9.429 88 G 101-21703 FICA Tax Withholding $4.528 22 G 101-21703 FICA Tax Withholding ^5?8^2 Total FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES $18,486 32 FEDERAL W/H FICA & MEDICARE W/H FICA & MEDCR CITY SHARE Paid Chk# 075409 2/19/03 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST • 457 G 101-21705 Other Retirement $300.00 ToUl ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST • 457 $300 00 DEFERRED COMP Paid Chk# 075410 2/19/03 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE G 101-21707 Union Dues „^i®3.16 Total LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE $58316 UNION DUES Paid Chk# 075411 2/19/03 MN DEPT OF REVENUE G 101-21702 State Withholding Total MN DEPT OF REVENUE $3.82S05 $3.82805 STATE TAX W/H Paid Chk# 075412 2/19/03 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST G 101-21705 Other Retirement Total ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST $2.789 68 MN STATE RETIREMENT Paid Chk# 075413 2/19/03 PEBSCO/OBRA G 101-21705 Other Retirement Tout PEBSCO/OBRA $9 71 $9 71 Paid Chk# 075414 2/19/03 PEBSCOAJS CONF OF MAYORS G 101-21705 Other Retirement $2.289 00 Total PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS $2,289 00 Paid Chk# 075415 2/19/03 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT G 101-21704 PERA $6,562 92 G 101-21704 PERA $5.13045 Total PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT $11.693 37 Paid Chk# 075416 2/19/03 UNITED WAY G 101-21708 United Way Total UNITED WAY $6500 $6500 Paid Chk# 075417 2/19/03 WISCONSIN SCTF G 101 -21712 Other Deductions Tout WISCONSIN SCTF $18462 $18462 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 10100 PrimaryCash $50.913 91 10100 PnmaryCash $50,91391^ $50.913 91 OBRA DEFERRED COMP USCM. ENTITY 2339 PERA CITY SHARE PERA EMPLOYEE W/H CHARITY DONATIONS JOHNSON # 0002756898 CITY OF ORONO 02^1/03 9:20 AM Page 1 *Check Detail Register© FEBRUARY 2003 Check Anit Invoice Comment 10100 Primary Cash Paid Chk# 075418 2/24/2003 A.J. GALLAGHER A CO OF MN, INC E 61349830-370 E 101-42110-370 E 101-41900-370 E 602-49450-370 E 601-49400-370 ToUl A.J. Insurance Agent of Record Insurance Agent of Record Insurance Agent of Record Insurance Agent of Record Insurance Agent of Record GALLAGHER A CO OF MN, INC $75.00 $910.00 $550 00 $185 00 $80 00 22394 22394 22394 22394 22394 1st Qtr Ins Agent 1st Qtr Ins Agent 1st Qtr Ins Agent 1st Qtr Ins Agent 1st Qtr Ins Agent $1.800 00 PaidChkA 075419 2/24/2003 A.T.O.M. E 101-42110-437 Training A Development Total A.T.O.M. ^85 00 4331 $85 00 Emotional Survival-Erlckson Paid Chk# 075420 2/24/2003 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SERVICES E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $109 00 6013-301213 Coffee E 101-42110-201 Office supplies $54.50 6013-301214 Coffee E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $77.65 6013-301215 Coffee-PW Total ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SERVICES $24115 Paid Chk# 075421 2/24/2003 ARMOR HOLDINGS FORENSICS, INC E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $123 13 F03-045251 Fngrprnt Pwdr/Ftpmt Wax Tout ARMOR HOLDINGS FORENSICS, INC $123.13 Paid Chk#W5422 2/24/2003 BFI OF MINNESOTA, INC E 101-45200-319 Other Professional Services E 101-41900-489 Other Miscellaneous Charges E 613-49830-319 Other Professional Services Total BFI OF MINNESOTA, INC $78 90 1307115-0301 Solid Waste-Bedenvood $204.88 1307420-0301 Solid Waste-CH ^28 92 1307461-0301 Solid Waste-GC $31*2 71 Paid Chk# 075423 2/24/2003 BOLTERS \N. MATT E 101-42400-437 Training A Development E 101-42400-437 Training A Development ToUl BOLTERMAN, MATT $29.30 2/14/03 $95.00 2/14/03 $124 30 Mileage/Parking Erosion Workshop Paid Chk# 0/5424 2/24/2003 BROWNELLS. INC E 101-42110-228 Training Supplies ToUl BROWNELLS. INC $241.05 2665323 Cleaning/Range Supplies $241 05 Paid Chk# 075425 2/24/2003 BUSINESS FORMS A ACCOUNTING E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $41 54 30769 1099‘s ToUl BUSINESS FORMS A ACCOUNTING $41 54 Paid Chk# 075426 2/24/2003 CARGILL SALT E 101-43000-224 Street Maint Materia!s/Suppty E 101-43000-224 Street Maint Matenals/Supply $4.092 32 674675 $2.068 83 676206 Road Salt Road Salt Tout CARGILL SALT $6,161 15 Paid Chk# 075427 2/24/2003 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO E 101-42110-402 E 101-42110-402 E 101-42110-402 E 101-42110-402 E 101-42110-402 E 101-42110-402 E 101-42110-402 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip Repairs/Mamt-Auto Equip Repairs/Mamt-Auto Equip Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip Repairs/Mamt-Auto Equip Repairs/Mamt-Auto Equip Repairs/Mamt-Auto Equip Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $43 19 $140 00 $115 06 $1.329 82 $493 18 $135 62 $486 92 $30 23 23201 23245 23250 23253 23254 23254 23274 23283 Posi Additive # 187 Repair Winng #192 Wig Wag. Bulb #185 Head Gasket #192 Oil. Brakes #190 Battery #194 Oil. Shocks #191 Oil Change #193 4 F CITY OF ORONO Check Detail Register® 02/21/03 9 20 AM Page 2 FEBRUARY 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment . . E 101-421KM02Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $129 29 23284 Oil, BeK #167 E 101.4211(M02 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $35 00 23290 Electrical #190 E 101.42110.402Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $35.66 23312 Fuses #190 E 10M2110.402Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $165.72 23319 Battery #168 E 101.42110-402Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $3500 23335 Grin Lights #189 E 101.42110.402Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $21.00 23338 Pwr Connection #167 E 231-45650-402Repairs/Mamt-Auto Equip $161 21 23345 Oil, Electical - Acura E 101.42110.402Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $3023 23348 Oil Change #195 Tout CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO $3,387.13 Paid Chief 075426 2/24/2003 CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN G 101-20805 Due to govts-Local $26.308 04 2000 Fire Service - 2000 G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $943 64 2000 Fire Service • 20(X) G101-20200 Accounts Payable ($1,994.34) 2001 Fire Service - 2001 G 101-20805 Due to govts-Local $31.500 00 2001 Fire Service - 2001 G101-20200 Accounts Payable $42,338^2002 Fire Service - 2002 Tout CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN $^'096 30 Paid Chkf 075429 2/24/2003 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH E 101.42110-322Postage $17.68 2/2003 Postage E 101-41900-322PosUge $0.58 2/2003 PosUge Due E 101-41900-322Postage $1 06 2/2003 Postage Due E 101-42110-221Equipment Parts A Accessories $637 2/2003 MIC Clips - PO E 101-42400-439Meeting Expenses $9 60 2/2003 Cookies - PInng W/S E 101-41110-439Meeting Expenses $10.00 2/2003 Council W/S 2/10 E 101-41300-469Other Misceilaneous Charges $11.57 2/2003 Retirement • Johnson E 10M1300-469Other Miscellaneous Charges $1383 2/2003 Roses - Johnson E 101-41110439Meeting Expenses $20 00 2/2003 Pies-W/S 11/21 E 101-41300-469Other Miscellaneous Charges $37.23 2/2003 Holiday Luncheon E 101-42400-439Meeting Expenses $40 00 2/2003 Cake - Weinberger E 101-42400-439Meeting Expenses $2389 2/2003 Reception - Chaput ToUl CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH $191.81 Paid Chk« 075430 2/24/2003 CLASSIFIEDS G 231-20200 Accounts Payable $24 30 20545 1993 Harley G 231-20200 Accounts Payable $24.3020545 Trk Topper G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $243020545 1999 Crown Vic G 231-20200 Accounts Payable $243020545 1987 Caravelle ToUl CLASSIFIEDS $97 20 Paid Chk» 075431 2/24/2003 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN E 101-43000-224 Street Main! Materials/Suppty $54 60 2253110 E 101-43000-224 Street Maint Materials/Suppty S5A60 2256510 Tout CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN $109 20 Materiats/Equip Adv 2003 Matenala/E^uip Adv 2003 Paid Chk« 075432 2/24/2003 CROW RIVER SUSPENSION A ALIGN E 101-43000-402 Repairs/Matnt-Auto Equip $522 48 3033 Tout CROW RIVER SUSPENSION A ALIGN $522 48 Springs • Truck 431 Paid Chk« 075433 2/24/2003 CROWN MARKING INC. E 101 -41000-201 Office supplies ToUl CROWN MARKING INC. $19.70 105382 $19 70 Name Plates Paid Chk# 075434 2/24/2003 CRY8TEEL E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories E 101 -43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories $275 08 F109041 $116.35 F109352 Plow Supplies Snow Plow Control CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 02^1/03 9 20 AM Page 3 Total CRY8TEEL FEBRUARY 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment $391.43 Paid Chk# 075435 2/24/2003 DBB RMS G 602-20200 Accounts Payable G 601-20200 Accounts Payable ToUl D&BRMS $96.57 211220223-AF Arch Wireless - Pagers $96.^7 211220223-AF Arch Wireless • Pagers $193.14" Paid Chk# 075436 2/24/2003 DAHLOREN 8HARDLOW & UBAN E 101-43280-304 Engineering-Consulting $76.64 23752 E 101-43280-304 Engineering-Consulting ToUl DAHLOREN 8HARDLOW 8 UBAN $361 00 23821 App 02-2789/2840 App 02-2789/2840 $437.64 Paid Chki 075437 2/24/2003 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO. E 602-49450-406 Repairs/Maint-Sv^ tines/lifts ToUl DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO. $296^5 3155469 $296.15'’ GS #3 Repairs Paid Chk# 075438 2/24/2003 DCA - WIRE ONLY G 101-21719 DCA/Spending Accounts Tout DCA-WIRE ONLY $J35_00 2/18A)3 $135.00" Flex Spending 2/18 Paid Chk# 075439 2/24/2003 DE BAERE, DON E 602-49450-437 Training & Development Tout DE BAERE, DON $43.90 2/10/03 $43 90 Mileage - Sewer School Paid Chk* 075440 2/24/2003 DELTA DENTAL G 101-21709 Dental Insurance $1,347.80 0037220072 Oantal • 3/2003 G 101-15998 Non-Employee Health Ins $54.50 0037220072 Denial - 3/2003 G 101-21709 Dental Insurance ($0 21) 0037220072 Denut-3/2003 ToUl DELTA DENTAL $1,402.^ 2/24/2003 G 101-20200 Accounts Payable Tout DEPT OF ADM-INTERTECH GROUP $37.0^ DV02120314 PVC -12/2002 $37.00 Paid Chk# 075442 2/24/2003 DRIVERS UCENSE GUIDE CO. E 101-42110-433 Memberships 8 Subscriptions $25 95 400774 2003 ID Checking Guide Tout DRIVERS LICENSE GUIDE CO.$2595 Paid Chki 075443 2/24/2003 E-Z RECYCLING E 101-43270-316 Contract Recycling Pickup ToUl E-Z RECYCLING $6.409 20 4778 $6.409 20 Recycling 2/2003 Paid Chk# 075444 2/24/2003 EGAN-MCKAY ELECTRICAL CONTRCTR E 101-43000-408 Contracted Street Maint $228 15 JC3008985 Tout EGAN-MCKAY ELECTRICAL CONTRCTR $228 15 Traffic Light-TH12/CR6 Paid Chk# 075445 2/24/2003 ELECTRIC RESOURCE CONTRACTORS E 101-43000-408 Contracted Street Maint $106 73 21321 E 101-41900-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds $560 90 31179 Tout ELECTRIC RESOURCE CONTRACTORS $667.63 Check Semiphore Replace Heater - CC Paid Chk# 075446 2/24/2003 ELMER J. PETERSON CO. E 602-49450-406 Repairs^'Maint-Swr lines/lifts Tout ELMER J. PETERSON CO. $687 50 2/10/2003 $687.50 Sewer Break - Shoreline Paid Chk# 075447 2/24/2003 ERICKSON. KURT E 101-42110-437 Training & Development $61.03 021203 Mileage/Meals-Dnving School aTY OF ORONO 02/21/03 920 AM Page 4 *Check Detail Register® FEBRUARY 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment Total ERICKSON. KURT $61 03 Paid Chk# 075448 2/24/2003 EXPRESS MESSENGER E 10M1900>322 Postage Tout EXPRESS MESSENGER $17.16 8-315666 $17.16 Delivery • Hinshaw Paid Chk# 075449 2/24/2003 GSK SERVICES G 613-20200 Accounts Payable G 601-20200 Accounts Payable G 602-20200 Accounts Payable G 101-20200 Accounts Payable G 613-20200 Accounts Payable G 601-20200 Accounts Payable E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds E 101-41900-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds E 101-41900-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds E 101-43000-226 Clothing & peisonal equipment E 101 -43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 602-49450-226 Clothing & personal equipment E 613-49830-226 Clothing & personal equipment E 601-49400-226 Clothing & personal equipment E 101-43000-226 Clothing & personal equipment E 602-49450-226 Clothing & personal equipment E 613-49830-226 Clothing & personal equipment E 601 -49400-226 Clothing & personal equipment E 101 -43000-226 Clothing & personal equipment E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 602-49450-226 Clothing & personal equipment E 613-49830-226 Clothing & persona! equipment E 601 -49400-226 Clothing & personal equipment Tout GAKSERVICE8 Paid Chk# 075450 2/24/2003 GENUINE PARTS CO. G 101-20200 Accounts Payable E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 101 -43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 101 -43000-221 Equipment Pa.is & Accessories E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 101 -43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 101 -43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 601 -49400-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 101 -43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories G 101-20200 Accounts Payable G 101 -20200 Accounts Payable E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories G 101 -20200 Accounts Payable Total GENUINE PARTS CO. Paid Chk# 075451 2/24/2003 GERRJNG'S CAR WAiH G 101-20200 Accounts Payable E 101-42110-403 Repairs/Maint-Misc Equip E 101-42110-403 Repairs/Maint-Misc Equip $7.88 389644 Uniform - Steffenhagen $1443 389645 Uniform • Rathbun $26 09 438434 Uniforms $6087 438434 Uniforms $7.88 438435 Uniform • Steffenhagen $14.43 438436 Uniform - Rathbun $129 82 466434 Mat Service _ PO $50 66 466435 Mat Service - Adm $50 66 466436 Mat Service - CC $64 31 473465 Uniforms $51.76 473485 Uniforms $27.57 473485 Shop Towels $7 88 473486 Uniform - Steffenhagen $14.43 473487 Uniform - Rathbun $6087 480545 Uniforms $26 09 480545 Uniforms $7 88 480546 Uniform - Steffenhagen $1443 480547 Uniform • Rathbun $7078 487584 Uniforms $53 10 487584 Shop Towels $30 34 487584 Uniforms $7 88 487585 Uniforms • Steffhagen $1443 487586 Uniforms • Rathbun $814 47 $6 36 726616 Bars Leaks $10 19 727415 Fitter $4 36 727850 Wrench $14 19 728119 Carb Cleaner $34 30 728566 Cleaners. 0-Rings $8 28 728568 Switch $21.28 729004 Wiper Blades ($12 13)729221 Return $24 98 729564 Oil Fitters $20 44 729779 Air Filters $10 80 730356 Washer Fluid $850 730388 Hose End $33 35 730598 Wiper Blade. Switch $324 90 897656 Batteries/Smart Trailer $1060 898790 Misc Supplies $1796 899771 Wpr Blades. Wshr Fid $8 28 904210 Switch $546 64 $10 50 12/17/02 Wash Sqd 177 $7.00 266 Car Washes $8 00 306 Car Washes I CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 02/21/03 9:20 AM Pages FEBRUARY 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment E 10 M2110-403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip $7 00 317 Car Washes E 101-42110-403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip $7.00 337 Car Washes ToUl GERRING'S CAR WASH $39.50 Paid Chk« 075452 2/24/2003 QOPHER STATE ONE-CALL E 602-49450-489 Other Mitcellaneous Charges $3 68 3010611 January Locates E 601 -49400-489 Other Miscellaneous Charges $3.87 3010611 January Locates Total GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL $7.75 Paid Chk« 075453 2/24/2003 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE E 101-41900-223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies $57.45 36675 Ice Melt Total HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE $57.45 Paid ChkP 075454 2/24/2003 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TECH OPT 0 101-20200 Accounts Payable $2.948 30 2niOZ 2002 Radio Lease E 101-41900-329 Other Communications $88.33 23017181 Database Access -1/2003 Total HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TECH DPT $3,036.63 Paid Chk« 075455 2/24/2003 HINSHAW S CULBERTSON 0 101-20200 Accounts Payable $689 00 10282017 Prof Prop of Ofono G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $264.00 10282017 Rydell Easements G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $541.16 10282017 General Legal Dec 02 0 101-20200 Accounts Payable $1,30000 10282018 Council Mtgs Dec 2002 Total HINSHAW S CULBERTSON $2,7W.16 Paid Chk« 075456 2/24/2003 HINZE BUSINESS MACHINES E 101-42110-401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip $75.00 31564 Lasar Printer Cleaning E 101-41900-401 Repairs/Maint-OffIce Equip $150 00 31564 Laser Printer Cleaning Total HIN2E BUSINESS MACHINES $225.00 PaidChk* 075457 2/24/2003 HYDRO SUPPLY CO. E 601 -49400-227 UUlity System MalnL Supplies $378.56 22882 Meter Setters ToUl HYDRO SUPPLY CO.$378^56 PaidChk# 075458 2/24^003 IMAGINALITY E 613-49830-441 Licenses & Taxes $323 70^11051 Sates Tax - Golf Signs Total IMAGINALITY $323y0 Paid Chk» 075459 2/24/2003 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS E 101-42110-240 Small Tools and Minor Equip $51120 36483 Desk Chairs Tout INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS $511.20 PaidChk# 075460 2/24/2003 INTERSTATE BATTERIES E 101-43000-222 Vehicle Equipment & Parts $222 48 20017154 Batteries Totol INTERSTATE BATTERIES $22248 Pii6 Chki 075461 2/24/2003 KEEPERS E 101-42110-226 Clothing & personal equipment $350 85 9767 Uniform Supplies - Johnson E 101-42110-226 Clothing A personal equipment ($143 90) 9767-80 Uniform Supplies - Johnson Total KEEPERS $206 95 Paid Chki 075462 2/24/2003 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC E 101 -42110-403 Repairs/Maint-Misc Equip $212 92 150652 Radar Repair Total KUSTOM SIGNALS INC $212S2 2/24/2003 E 101-41110^33 Membership* & Subscriptions S10.376.14 1/3/2003 1st Qtr 2003 LMCD Levy CITY OF ORONO 02/21/03 9:20 AM Pag* 6 *Check Detail Register® FEBRUARY 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment ToUl LAKE BITKA CONSERVATION DI8T.$10,376.14 ?>aidChM 075464 2/24/2003 UTTLE FALLS MACHINE, INC E 101-43000-221 Equiptnant Parts & Accettories S107.95 29505 Parts f426 Total LITTLE FALLS MACHINE, INC S107.95 Paid Chk« 075465 2/24/2003 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT E 101-43000-403 RepairsMaint-Misc. Equip $1.60 42972 E 101-43000-403 Repairs/Maint-Misc Equip Total LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT $76 43 43182 Gasket Repair • Stilh Saw $7803 Paid Chk« 075466 2/24/2003 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI & CO E 101-41900-301 Auditing and AccTg Services $1.907.00 10569 Total MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI S CO Audit RFP i1 $1,907.00 Paid Chki 075467 2/24/2003 MEDICA G 10;-21706 HospHalization/Medical Ins G 101 -15998 Non-Employee Health Ins G 101 -21706 Hospitalization/Medical Ins G 101-15998 Non-Employee Health Ins O 101-21706 Hospitalization/Medical Ins Total MEDICA $9,937.20 $1,693 92 $2,191 74 $64347 $7,069.53 103060102552 Medica High 3/2003 103060102552 Medica High 3/2003 103060122585 Medica Low • 3/2003 103060125488 Medica Elect 3/2003 103060125488 Medica Elect 3/2003 $21.535 86 Paid Chk« 075468 2/24/2003 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS E 602-49450-383 MWCC-Current Charges $35.^67 750973 Total MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS ! Wastewater Service 3/2003 $35.16067 Paid Chk« 075469 2/24/2003 MIDWEST FUELS E 101-43000-212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants G 101-14101 Gasoline Inventory Total MIDWEST FUELS $378 71 4551 $3,288.36 4551 $3,667.07 300 8 Gals Diesel 2454 Gals Unleaded Paid Chki 075470 2/24/2003 MILE E 101-42110-437 Training & Development E 101-42110-437 Training & Development Total MILE $225 00 21629 $225 00 21660 $450 00 Use of Force - EncKson OWI Update - Hendricks I Paid Chki 075471 2/24/2003 MINN COMM E 101-42110-321 Telephone E 601 -49400-489 Other Miscellaneous Charges E 602-49450-489 Other Miscellaneous Charges Total MINN COMM $38 04 20261002032 Pagers-PoHce $32 35 48300502035 Pagers-PW $32 35 48300502035 Pagers-PW $10274 Paid Chk# 075472 2/24/2003 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $52 54 741015 E 101-43000-415 Other Equipment Rentals $3169 RI01030884 E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $ 15 85 RI01030885 ToUl MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY $100 08 Medical Oxygen Oxygen. Acetylene Cylinders Oxygen Cylinder Paid Chki 075473 2/24/2003 MN COUNTIES INSURANCE TRUST E 101-41900-489 Other Miscellaneous Charges Total MN COUNTIES INSURANCE TRUST $125 00 2003 Drug & Alcohol Testing Paid Chk# 075474 2/24/2003 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Q 101-20806 Due to Oovts-State Sales Tax G 601-20806 Due to Govts-State Sales Tax R 101-34650 Police Reports $600 1/2003 $33700 1/2003 $6 00 1/2003 Sales Tax 1/2003 Sales Tax 1/2003 Sales Tax 1/2003 1 CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register<i) 02/21/03 9 20 AM Page 7 FEBRUARY 2003 Check Amt invoice Comment R 601-39610 Miscellaneous Revenue R101-34210 General Taxable Sales/Secvioe Total MN DEPT OF REVENUE $23 00 1/2003 $29.00 1/2003 Sales Tax 1/2003 Sales Tax 1/2003 $401.00 Paid Chk« 075475 2/24/2003 MN GOLF ASSOCIATION INC. E 613-49630-433 Memberships & Subscriptions $90.00 6080 Total MN GOLF ASSOCIATION INC.$90 00 2003 MGA Membership Paid Chk« 075476 2/24/2003 NAVARRE HARDWARE E 101-43000-221 E 601-49400-221 E 101-45200-223 E 101-43000-221 E 101-43000-224 E 101-43000-221 E 101-42110-201 E 101-42110-221 E 101-43000-221 E 101-41900-221 E 101-42110-201 E 101-43000-221 E 101-42110-221 E 101-41900-403 E 101-41900-403 E 602-49450-227 E 602-49450-227 E 101-42110-221 E 101-42110-221 E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories Equipment Parts & Accessories Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies Equipment Parts & Accessories Street Maint. Materials/Supply Equipment Parts & Accessories Orrice supplies Equipment Parts & Accessories Equipment Parts & Accessories Equipment Parts & Accessories Office supplies Equipment Parts & Accessories Equipment Parts & Accessories Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip Utility System Maint. Supplies Utility System Maint. Supplies Equipment Parts & Accessories Equipment Parts & Accessories Equipment Parts & Accessories Total NAVARRE HARDWARE $3.20 $638 $20.41 $11.05 $14.68 $19.16 $17.09 $5 50 $1 60 $12.31 $23.41 $11.03 $28 07 $669 $879 $74.42 $318 $15.09 ($4 31) $476 112681 112692 112700 112818 112821 112867 112968 113101 113138 113229 113244 113277 113380 113446 113453 113505 113524 113530 113644 113768 Pins Marking Paint Salt Pellets Rope. Bar Scrwrdriver. Lube Twine lock Supplies Mousetrap Misc Hardware Comer irons Trash Can 100W Bulbs Batteries Stain Touch Up Mouse Traps GS #6 Repairs Propane Cylinder Misc Hardware Returns Elec Tape $282.51 Paid Chk# 075477 2/24/2003 OFFICE DEPOT E 101-41900-201 Office supplies E 101-42110-201 OfTtce supplies E 101-41900-201 Office supplies E 101-41900-201 Office supplies E 101-42110-201 Office supplies E 101-41900-201 Office supplies E 101-42110-201 Office supplies ToUl OFFICE DEPOT $50831 $41589 $439 $269 91 $220 84 $6 86 $5 62 $1,431 82 193780225-00 193780225-00 193780225-00 194681329-00 194681329-00 194681329-00 194681329-00 Office Supplies Office Supplies Office Supplies Office Supplies Office Supplies Office Supplies Office Supplies Paid Chk# 075478 2/24/2003 ONYX FCR LANDFILL. INC E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds ToUl ONYX FCR LANDFILL. INC $66 88 $66 88 3392 RR Tie Disposal - Sohns Paid Chk# 075479 2/24/20d3 PERRY'S TRUCK REPAIR E 101-43000-402 Repairs/Mamt-Auto Equip $1.410 52 ToUl PERRrSTRUCKREPAlR $1.410 52 7197 Body Work #710 Paid Chk# 075480 2/24/2003 QWEST E 601-49400 321 Telephone Tout QWEST $103 00 $103 00 612E44(X)16 Phone Service Paid Chk# 075481 2/24/2003 RDO FINANCIAL SERVICES E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts S Accessories $99 29 128035 Tout RDO FINANCIAL SERVICES $99 29 Positioner. C-Hook JU CITY OF ORONO Check Detail Register® 02/21/03 920 AM Pages FEBRUARY 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment hk« 0754B2 2/24/2003 REED VENDINO E 613^9900^3 Concessions For Resale-Txtoi Tout REED VENDINO $105 00 $105.00 4188 Concessions • Sledding Paid Chk« 075483 2/24/2003 RESOURCE ONE E 101-41900-201 Office supplies Tout RESOURCE ONE $284.70 2/20/03 Labor Law Posters $284.70 Paid Chk# 075484 2/24/2003 S H BARTLETT COMPANY E 101-41900-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories Total 8 H BARTLETT COMPANY $1547 $15 47 10667 Sink Repair Kit Paid Chk# 075485 2/24/2003 SA-AO INC. E 101-43000-224 Street Maint Materials/Suppiy E 101-43000-224 E 101-43000-224 E 101-43000-224 E 101-43000-224 Street Maint Materials/Suppiy Street Maint. Materlats/Suppty Street Maint. Materials/Supply Street Maint. Materials/Supply ToUl 8A-AOINC. $18647 $153.52 $2.69356 $2.049 21 $1,467.56 $6.55032 27951 27952 27969 27987 27997 Road Sand Road Sand Road Sand Road Sand Road Sand 2/24/2003Paid Chk# 075486 E 101-41800-490 Contributions to Civic Org's Total SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES $4,025 OO^ 2/6/03 $4,025.00 1 St Qtr 2003 Sr Services Paid Chk# 075487 2/24/2003 SIRCHIE FINGER PRINT LABS E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 302788 Total SIRCHIE FINGER PRINT LABS Crime Scene Supplies $6256 Paid Chk# 075488 2/24/2003 STA-SAFE LOCKSMITH E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds Total STA-SAFE LOCKSMITH $18324 $18324 ’ 14401 Lock • Nortti Wlr Pint Paid Chk# 075489 2/24/2003 STANTON GROUP E 101-41900-489 Other Miscellaneous Charges E 101-41900-489 Other Miscellaneous Charges E 101-41900-489 Other Miscellaneous Charges Total STANTON GROUP $5250 $497.50 $137 75 $^775 333039 333040 333040 COBRA Adm-1/2003 FSA Renewal 2003 FSA - Account Paid Chk# 075490 2/24/2003 STAR TRIBUNE E 101-42110-340 General Advertising Total STAR TRIBUNE $397.80 $397 80 012757006 Adv for Employment-Police 'paid Chk# 075491 2/24/2003 STAR TRIBUNE • SERVICE E 101 -42110-433 Memberships & Subscriptions Tout STAR TRIBUNE • SERVICE Sill 80 Sill 60 1069427 Star Tnbune Subscription Paid Chk« 075492 2/24/2003 SUN NEWSPAPERS E 101-42110-340 General Advertising S210 85 569350 Adv for Emp - PD E 101-41900-352 Printing & Publishing ToUl SUN NEWSPAPERS Si 97 80 $408 65 573568 Adv for Emp • Cust Service Paid Chkf 075493 2/24/2003 TALLEN AND BAERTSCHI E 101-41600-306 Legal-Prosecut on Total TALLEN AND BAERTSCHI $7206 $72 06 1/2003 Conflict Prosecutions 1/2003 E 101-42110-437 Training A Development $195 00 1007679 M26 Instructor • J Johnson CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 02/21/03 920 AM Page 9 Total TASER INTERNATIONAL FEBRUARY 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment $195 00 Paid Chki 075495 2/24/2003 TOXALERT E 101*43000*404 Repairs/Maint*Bldgs/Grounds ToUl TOXALERT $697 50 6963 $69>.50' C02 Sensor Repair Paid Chk« 07M96 2/24/2003 UNitu R^ENTALS E 601 *49400*415 Other Equipment Rentals E 602*49450*415 Other Equipment Rentals Total UNITED RENTALS $36 32 598070 $36 31 598070 57263 Barricades Barricades Paid Chk# 075497 2/24/2003 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE E 101-41900-322 Postaga Tout UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE $1.800 00 89549067 $1.800 00 Postage for Meter Paid Chk# 075498 2/24/2003 UNIV OF MINNESOTA E ^ 01 *4 2400*437 Training & Development Total UNIV OF MINNESOTA $48 00 0008 003 $48 00 Municipals • Chaput Paid Chk# 075501 2/24/2003 VILLAGE CHEVROLET G 101-20200 Accounts Payable E 101-42400-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip Total VILLAGE CHEVROLET $38 44 381195 $1,004 W CTCS312137 $1.043 40 Truck Parts Injectors-Truck 210 Paid Chk# 075502 2/24/2003 WAGERS E 101*42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories Total WAGERS $240 05 ARIN009217 $240 05 Toner/Ofum Kit-PD Fax Paid Chk# 075503 2^24/2003 WIDMEH INC E 602*49450-406 Repairs/Maint*Swr lines/lifts E 601*49400*405 Repairs/Maint*Watermains/plant Total WIDMERINC $2.560 50 5843 $2.379 00 5348 $4,939 50 Repair Sewer Line Curbstop - 3630 Livingston E 101 -41300*319 Other Professional Services Total WINTERNHEIMER. ALISSA S13500 $135 00 Council Minutes - 2/10/03 PaidChk# 075505 2/24 2003 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER E 602-49450-223 Clothing & personal equipment E 602*49450*221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 601 *49400*221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 101 *43000*221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 601 *^9400*221 Equipment Parts & Accessories Total VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER $44 07 $19 02 $19 03 $43 41 $64 51 $190 04 117273 117273 117273 117273 117273 Safety Harness Batteries Batteries Marking Tape. Ear Plugs Eyewash Nozzle 10100 Primary Cash $232,725 26 ♦ CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 02/21/03 9 20 AM Page 10 FEBRUARY 2003 CtMckAml Invoke Coimiiem Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUf4D 231 ORUO/FELONY FORFEITURE FUND 601 WATER OPFRATINO FUND 602 SEWER or ERATINO FUND 613 GOLF COURSE 10100 Primary Caah $186,640.09 $234.11 $3,835.42 $39.35361 $662.03 $232,725.26 1! * = r CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail RegistertD 02/21/03 9:20 AM Pagel 1 FEBRUARY 2003 Amt Invoice Comment 10100 PrimeyyCeeh TiB75i33r5?wo6“*3T52oo3 plyi«outh creek center E 101-42110-489 Other Miscetleneoue Charges Total PLYMOUTH CREEK CENTER $159.75 2/11/03 Field House Rental • Testing $159.75 10100 Primary Cash $159.75 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 10100 Primary Cash $159.75 $159.75