HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-06-2004 Truth in Taxation Hearing Packet\
Mimms OP THB TRUTH IN TAXATION HHARZNG
HELD AT 5:30 P.M. ON MONDAY, DBCBMBBR 6, 2004
IN THE ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MftMbftra Praaanti Mayor Peterson and Council Members McMillan,
Sansevere and White.
Staff Praaant: City Administrator Ron Moorse and Finance
Director Tom Kuehn.
Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order and opened the hearing
at 5:34 p.m. There were no members of the public present.
Moorse outlined the proposed budget and tax levy increases, and
summarized the reasons for the increases.
There being no public comments. Mayor Peterson closed the
hearing.
Council Maabar Sanaavara novad. Council Meabar White aacondad tha
announcaaant that tha 2005 budget and tax levy will be adopted at
a hearing to be held at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, Dacaabar 6, 2005.
Vote: 4 Ayaa, 0 Maya.
ADJOURl
Council MaMhar SauSavara moved. Council Maabar White aacondad,
that tha meeting be adjourned at 5:37 p.m. Vote: 4 Ayaa, 0
Naya.
ATTBST:
J I
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor
^ * e fr* ^ ^
C t Td r y I
(3
i
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: December 3,2004
ITEM NO:
Department Approval:
Name Ronald J. Mootse
Title City Administrator
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
City Administrator ’s Report
Item Description: Truth in Taxation Heaftng-2005 Budget and Tax Levy
Attachments: 1. Tax Levies—Actual 2004 vs. proposed 2005
2. Tax Capacity, Local Levy, and Tax Capacity Rates
3. Effect of 2005 Tax Levy on Property owners
Truth in Taxation Hearing
The Truth in Taxation hearing is an opportunity for the public to ask questions and provide
comments regarding the proposed 2005 budget and tax levy.
Proposed 2005 Budget
The proposed 2005 budget reflects an effort to address a number of deferred needs, as well as to
fund a number of special projects, while managing the impact of the tax levy on property owners.
Goals of the 2005 Budget
The following is an outline of the goals of the 2005 budget
• To improve service delivery and customer service
• To provide a sustained drug enforcement effort
• To increase the City's capacity to use information technology
• To improve the maintenance of the City's infrastructure
• To take advantage of the opportunity to re-think the design and function of current
Highway 12, in preparation for the turnback of this roadway from the State to the County.
• To begin to address long term public improvement needs
Onnortunitv To Address Deterred Needs
Over the past 10 years, the tax levy has been increasing at an average rate of 3.98% per year.
This has been an important factor in enabling the city's tax rate to remain one of the lowest in the
County. Over the past several years, a number of priority needs have been identified. Howc\ er.
the impacts of the State’s budget problems, including State .^id cuts and levy limits, have caused
these needs to be deferred.
The 2005 budget is the first opportuniU ’ the City has had to address the deferred needs, in order
to have a substantial impact on the level and quality of services provided in the areas of Police.
F
►k >
Fire, Streets, Stormwater Management, Sewer, and Water, as well as substantially strengthening
the City’s ability to use and manage technology to improve productivity and customer service.
Tax Capacity Rate Reduction Results in Minimal Property Tax Impact on Property Owners
Based on the proposed budget and tax levy, and the substantial increase in the City’s tax capacity
(tax base), the City’s share of the property tax bill for Orono property owners will increase by
1.1%. Tlie City's tax capacity has increased by approximately 17.9%. Applying the proposed
tax levy to the estimated tax capacity results in a tax rate of 16.22%, which is a substantial
reduction from the 2004 level of 17.641 %. Using this tax rate, the City's share of the property
tax bill on a home valued at $300,000, assuming a 10% value increase, will increase by $6.03, or
1.1%. For a home valued at $800,000, the City’s share of the property tax bill will increase bv
$37.86, or 2.5%.
Tax Lew
The total tax levy required to fund the proposed 2005 budget is $3,461,670. This is an iiicrcasc
of $263,740, or 8.25 % over the 2004 levy. The breakout of the use of tax levy revenues by fund
is shown on the attached chart titled Tax Levies. The General Fund expenditures have the
greatest impact on the proposed tax levy. In addition, the Infrastructure levy in the PIR Fund
(for street rehabilitation) has been increased from $35,450 to $69,950.
The tax le\7 required to fund the propo.sed 2005 General Fund budget is $3,005,470. This is an
increase of $354,240, or 13.36% over the 2004 levy amount. Of this amount, $80,000 is not a
levy increase, but rather is a shifting of tax levy from the Improvement and Equipment Outlay
Fund to the General Fund. Excluding the $80,000 of expenditures shifted to the General Fund,
the lew inciease is $274,240. or 10.3%.
General Fund Budget Expenditures
The proposed expenditures in the General Fund arc having the greatest impact on the tax le\y.
The proposed 2005 General Fund expenditures are $5,132,950. This is an increase of $431,460,
or 9.18% over the 2004 budget. The largest expenditure increase is the transfer of S80.000 of
vehicle replacement expenditures from the Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund to the
General Fund. The other main items causing the General Fund expenditure increase include the
addition of a police investigator and a narcotics investigator, the addition of a part-time Finance
Clerk, annual compensation adjustments. Navarre Fire Station operating costs, and funding for
consultant assistance related to the turnback of current Hiehwav 12 from the State to the Countv.
Adoption of Final Budget and Tax Lew
The City will hold a levy adoption hearing at 7:00 p.m. on December 13. 2004. at which tlic final
budget and tax lew will be adopted.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Motion to announce that the final 2005 budget and tax lew will be adopted at the lew adoption
hearing, which will be held at 7:00 p in. on Monday. December 13.2004.
y
TAX i.i-vins
CcncrnI Fund
General I.evy
General Add Back W^/a of aids reduction
General Fund - PERA Rate Increases
General Fund - COPS Grant Decrease
Cieneral Fund - Capital Equipment Cert,
Total <^neral Fund Levy
CITY OF ORONO
TAX LEVIES
Actual 2004 vs Proposed 2005
Proposed 2005
Increase (Decrease)
Infrastructure (PIR)
Park Land Acquisition and Development
Imp & Equip Outlay - Capital Equip Cert
1997 Improvement Bond Debt Service
1999 Improvement Bond Debt Service
2003 Imp Refunding Bond Debt Service
1998 I IRA Refunding Bond Debt Service
2003 Fire Facility and Equipment Bond Debt Service
Total All Other Levies
TOTAL, TAX LEVIES FOR ALL PLIRPOSF.S
Actual Proposed From Actual 2004^ _
2004_2005 Amount_Percent _
$2,509,684 (a)$3,005,470
38,216 (a)—
5,540 —
14,790 —
83,000 —
—• ------------------—---------------... — ——
J2,65 1,230 $3,tM)5,470 $354,240 13.36%
35,450 (a)69,950 34,500 97.32%
5,000 (a)5,000 0 0.00%
125,000 —(125,000)-100.00%
18,000 18,000 0 0.00%
5,000 5,000 0 0.00%
35,000 35,000 0 0.00%
250.000 250,000 0 0.00%
73,250 73,250 _ - —O._ 0 00%
$546,700 $456,200 ($90,500)-16.55%
$3,197,930 $3,461,670
X——^ •
$263,740
Total "levy limif--2,588,350 (a)-0-
rL f MI}3
'• ' . ■
' • . '
« ^ . ■. «.
City of Orono
Tax Capacity, I-ocal Levy, & Tax Capacity Rates
TAX CALACniY
R<*al Rstate
Personal Property
Deduct Tax Increments
Deduct Contrib Fiscal Disp
Add Distribution Fiscal Disp
Net Tax Capacity (To calculate rate)
mCALUlVY
Total levy all funds
TAX CAPACITY RAT_t-_S
General Revenue
PIR Infrastucture-Storm Sewer / Roads
Parks - Land Acquisition & Development
Improve & liquip - Capital Lquipment
Debt Service
I IRA Building Bonds
Fire Facility & Lquipment Bonds Debt
Total I^rcal Tax Capacity Rate
milKinMOBSTAXCAri. 12 J
2005 Over (Under) 2004 _
Actual Estimated
2004 2005 Amount Percent
$18,108,033 $21,341,620 $3,233,587 17.86%
120,534 132,587 12,053 10,00%
(60,625)(66,688)(6,063)10.00%
(279,146)(307,061)(27,915)10.00%
219,720 _ 241,692 21,972 10.00%
$ 18,108,5 16_____$21,342,I^L $3,233,635 I7.86%_
_$3,197,930.$3,461,670^_______$263,740^8.25%
14.624%14.012%-0.612%-4.19%
0.196%0398%0.202%103.20%
0.028%0.023%-0.005%-16.33%
0.690%0.000%-0.690%•
0.320%‘ 0.272%-0.048%-15.07%
1.379%1.171%-0.208%-15.06%
0.404%0.343%-0.061%—
IT64l%_ 16.220%•1.421%-8.06%
i
rfAaiik
Effect of 2005 Tax Levy & Budget on Homes
2004 Tax Capacity (net) = I % of Orst $500,000 market value, plus ! .25% of all value over $500,000
2005 Tax Capacity (net) = 1% of lirsi $500,000 market value, plus 1.25% of all value o\cr $500,000
.Sk«f#iliDCnuafiS\Tau(b<.III
M»rktiJ^lHfJan:ZOMJj!iPS $300,000 $800,000
2QQ1 200i
5% incr
2005
10% incr
2004 2005
5% incr
2005
10% incr
y^tlffiated Markct yalue $300.000 $315.000 $330,000 $800,000 $84QJ)Q0 $380.000
Tax Capacity (Net) *3,000 3,150 3,300 8,750 9,250 9,750
l ax Capacity Rate 17.641%16.220%16.220%17.641%16.220%16.220%
Net fax $529.23 $510.93 \ $535.26 $1,543.59 $1,500.35 $1,581.45
$ Inticasc (Decrease) from 2001 mm ($18.30)$6.03 ($43.24)$37.86
% Increase (Decrease) from 2004 --3.5%1.1%-2.8%2.5%