The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05-10-2004 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, MAY 10, 2004, 7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items arc considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet. ROLL CALI.Co,fr>„ CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approve/Amend H4y Of RECOGNITION 2. Mike Brown and Jim Cox, Long Lake Firefighters - Resolution APPROVAL OF MINUTES • 3. Regular Council Meeting of April 26, 2004 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Paul Pcsek, Representative PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Ralph Kempf, Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 4. #04-3003 Bruce & Kristine Paddock with George W. Stickney, 3250 Fox Street - Preliminary Plat - Resolution * 5. Joint Use Dock License - Resolution 6. Interim Ordinance - Moratorium Revised Language - Ordinance MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR’S REPORT 7. Request for Payment #1 Brown Road North (Homestead) Sewer Project 8. Accept Resignation of Pauline Bouchard from the Park Commission 9. Navarre Municipal Parking Lot - 2 Hour Limit 10. Wetland Buffer Declaration for Big Island Access Lane CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 11. Appoint Planning Commission Alternates 12. Appoint Official City Representative for Big Island Veteran’s Camp Issues 13. Long Lake Fire Department Budget Amendment 14. Long Lake Fire Relief Association Pension 15. Request to Hire Part-Time Police Officer - Resolution 16. Authorization of Utility Easement Acquisition by Eminent Domain - Resolution 17. Police Serv ice Agreement with Spring Park 18. Recognition of Sandra Smith’s Dedicated Service on the Planning Commission 19. Recognition of Elizabeth Hawn’s Dedicated Service on the Planning Commission .^1 k: f, AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, MAY 10,2004,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT 20. LICENSES Kennel License Special Event Permits • 21. BILLS UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS im 05/17 05/18 05/20 05/21 05/22 05/24 05/28 05/29 05/31 Planning Commission Meeting, 6:00 p.m. (Council Liaison - Afayor Peterson) Council Work Session, Tuesday, 5:30 p.m. Highway 12 Workshop (Residents), Thursday, 7:00 p.m.-9:00 p.m.. The Church of St. George in Long Lake Leaf and Grass Disposal, Friday, Noon - 3:00 p.m. Leaf and Grass Disposal, Saturday, 9:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m. Couneil Meeting, 7:00 p.m. Leaf and Grass Disposal, Friday, Noon - 3:00 p.m. Leaf and Grass Disposal, Saturday, 9:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m. HOLIDAY, Observance of Memorial Day 06/02 06/04 06/05 06/07 06/10 06/14 06/21 06/28 Planning Commission Work Session, iVednesday, 5:30 p.m. Leaf and Grass Disposal, Friday, Noon - 3:00 p.m. Leaf and Grass Disposal, Saturday, 9:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m. Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p.m. (Council Liaison - Mayor Peterson) Council Work Session, Thursday, 5:30 p.m. Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. Planning Commission Meeting, 6:00 p.m. (Council Liaison - Lili McMillan) Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. C0> »^CPJ(|y|Q MAY 1 0 2004 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY OF ORONO DATE: May 7,2004 ITEM NO: ^ Department Approval: Name Ron Moorsc Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Recognition of Mike Brown and Jim Cox for their 40 years of Service on the Long Lake Fire Department Mike Brown and Jim Cox have reached the incredible milestone of 40 years of service as volunteer firefighters on the Long Lake Fire Department. They are being invited to the May 10 meeting to be recognized for their dedication to serving the community. As this memo was written, their availability to attend the meeting had not been confirmed. If they arc not available for the May 10 meeting, they will be recognized at the May 24 meeting. Resolutions of appreciation will be provided at the Council meeting COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the resolutions of appreciation for Mike Brown and Jim Cox to recognize their 40 years of dedicated service on the Long Lake Fire Department. J A RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING MIKE BROWN FOR HIS 40 YEARS OF DEDICATED SERV ICE AS A MEMBER OF THE LONG LAKE FIRE DEPAR I MENT RESOLUTION NO.5167 W'HEREAS, the City of Orono receives fire and rescue service from three volunteer Fire Departments; and and WHEREAS, the Long Lake Fire Department serves the largest portion of Orono; WHEREAS, the City of Orono and its citizens rely on the local volunteer Fire Departments for protection and assistance in emergency fire and rescue situations; and WHEREAS, the local Fire Departments are stalled by volunteers who contribute many hours of their time to ensure they are properly trained, and to respond to emergency situations; and WHEREAS, as the amount of time required for both training and emergency response continues to grow, along with the demands of work and family life, it is becoming more diffieult to rccru;t and retain volunteer firefighters; and WHEREAS, fortunately, there are those unique and special individuals who are driven to make volunteer firefighting a lifelong vocation; and WHEREAS, Mike Brown is one of those special persons who has devoted 40 years of his life to serving the community as a volunteer firefighter; and WHEREAS, Mike Brown has served in an officer capacity for at least 20 of his 40 years of service on the Long Lake Fire Department, including five years of distinguished service as Fire Chief. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono City Council does hereby recognize, and express its sincere appreciation to. Mike Brown for his 40 years of dedicated service to the community as a volunteer firefighter, including five years as Fire Chief, with the Long Lake Fire Department. Adopted by the Orono City Council this ICth day of May. 2004. ATIEST: Linda S. Vcc, Citv Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ♦ f A RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING JIM COX FOR HIS 40 YEARS OF DEDICATED SFRMCE AS A MEMBER OF THE LONG LAKE FIRE DEPARTMENT ^SOLUTION NO.5168 WHEREAS, the City of Orono receives fire and rescue service from three volunteer Fire Departments; and and WHEREAS, the Long Lake I'lrc Department serves the largest portion of Orono; WHEREAS, the City of Orono and its citizens rely on the local volunteer Fire Departments for protection and assistance in emergency fire and rescue situations; and WHEREAS, the local Fire Departments arc staffed by volunteers who contribute many hours of their time to ensure they arc properly trained, and to respond to emergency situations; and WHEREAS, as the amount of tiiite required for both training and emergency response continues to grow, along with the demands of work and family life, it is becoming more difficult to recruit and retain volunteer firefighters; and WHEREAS, fortunately, there arc those unique and special individuals who arc driven to make volunteer firefighting a lifelong %'ocation; and W'HEREAS, Jim Co.x is one of those special persons who has devoted 40 years of his life to serving the community as a volunteer firefighter; and WHEREAS, Jim Cox has served in an officer capacity for at least 20 of his 40 years of service on the Long Lake Fire Department. NOW, THEREFORE, BE I T RESOLVED that the Orono City Council does hereby recognize, and e.xprcss its sincere appreciation to, Jim Co.x for his 40 years of dedicated service to the community as a volunteer firefighter and officer with the Long Lake Fire Department. Adopted by the Orono City Council this lOth day of May, 2004. AITLST; Linda S. Vcc, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mavor a MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, April 26, 2004 7:00 o ’clock p.m. »4PrriNG MAY 1 0 2004 CITY OF ORONO ROLL The Council met on the above mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Barbara Peterson; Council members Jim White, Jim Murphy, Lili McMillan, and Bob Sanseverc; City Attorney Thomas Barrett; Representing staff were City Administrator Ron Moorsc, Planning Director Mike Gaffron, Planners Melanie Curtis and Janice Gundlach, City Engineer Tom Kellogg. Public Service Director Greg Gappa, and Recorder Kristi Anderson. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:01 P.M CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approvc/Amend While Item #5 was removed from Consent, items #13, 14,16, 17, and 19 were added to the Consent Agenda IVIurphy moved. White seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Vote: Ayes 5, Navs 0. RECOGNITION 2. Elizabeth Hawn - Planning Commission - Resolution 3. Sandra Smith - Planning Commission - Resolution 4. .Stephanie Zugschwert - Planning Commission - Resolution Mayor Peterson moved. White seconded, to table the three Recognition items #2-4. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. FIRE CHIEF’S REPORT E.xtelsior Fire Chief Mark DiiCliarmc reported that the Navarre Fire Station should be ready for operation by May I*', once the Hennepin County Dispatch has completed the programming for the paging system. He stated that 3-4 more recruits have come forward for scheduled training in July. DuCharme indicated that the ne.\t step will be further discussion regarding the utility vehicle, once the financials are in place over the next couple of weeks Long Lake Fire Administrative Officer Tony Roc added that he had begun talking to several truck suppliers. White a.sked whether he had seen the Long l ake F'irc Department at a fire call in Minnetonka Beach Roc stated tliat they had received the call first, and provided mutual aid to Mound who actually covers the area. Moorsc complimented the Long Lake Fire Department on a successful pancake breakjast the previous weekend. PAGE 1 of 12 i MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, April 26, 2004 7:00 o’clock p.m. FIRE CHIEF’S REPORT, Continued Roc stated that 700 people attended the breakfast. On another matter, he reported that resident Sam Marficid donated a 2001 pickup truck with only 7,000 miles to the department, which was greatly appreciated. Murphy stated that, as always, he is impressed by the relationship forged between these three communities and thanked the two for their commitment. He asked how the new firefighters were doing. DuCharme stated that the firefighters had completed their testing and the department is in a holding pattern awaiting the results. He was confident the outcome would be successful. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 5. Regular Council Meeting of April 12, 2004 Page 8, paragraph 2, the last line was amended to read, “He stated that in the past there was a lack of coordination efibrts from Long Lake.” While moved. Mayor Peterson seconded, to approve the Minutes of April 12, 2004, as amended. VOTE: Ayes 5, .Nays 0. PARK CO.M.MISSION COMMENTS - Debora llalvorson Halvorson thanked the Council for their support for increased use of Bederwood Park ball fields. She stated that the Commission would be meeting ne.xt week and continues to focus their efforts on prioritizing park needs and establishing long range park plans. With the likelihood that the conversion of the Dakota line will take place, Murphy suggested the Park Commission begin strategic planning for this trail. llalvorson staled that the Commission has started to identify areas for potential rest stops along the trail, including Old Crystal Bay Park and the planned park area north of the Navarre Fire Station. When available, Murphy suggested the Council and Commission hold a joint meeting to discuss these options. PLANNING CO>L%USSION COMMENTS - Jim LesUe Although he had nothing to report, Leslie stated that he would be available for questions. LMCD REPORT - Debora Halvorson Due to the imminent threat of zebra mussels contaminating Lake Minnetonka, Halvorson stated that an exotics subcommittee has determined w ith the DNR that increased inspections will take place over the summer months at many landings, including Gray’s Bay, Maxwell Bay, North Arm Bay, and Wayzata Bay landings. The inspections will begin May IS"" and run through September PAGE 2 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, April 26,2004 7:00 o’clock p.m. LMCD REPORT, Continued 19* during weekends. Halverson explained that the subcommittee has prepared a power point presentation to present to the 14 City Councils of the Lake area, which will educate and inform them of proposed action plans and ask for their support. White urged the LMCD and DNR to be proactive in this initiative. He was concerned that little enforcement accompanied the inspections and suggested that further signage be posted to educate the public. Sansevere commented that, although sad, he could foresee zebra mussels in the lake's future. Halvorson stated that efforts are being made to lobby for more money to further programs, create more education, and get the word out. McMillan stated that this is the best program that has been undertaken by the LMCD and DKR and will target high visibility weekends and traffic times. Although not 100% preventative, she was hopeful that the public would cooperate with the inspection process. Murphy suggested that further publicity be sought to educate the public about the threat posed by zebra mussels in our lakes. He felt that local television stations would be interested in broadcasting this message. McMillan added that, at a recent mayor’s meeting she ’d attended, the subject of milfoil har\ csting was broached by Deephaven, who'd like to see the Watershed District take o\ cr the har\ esting effort. She continued, noting that John Barton, of Hennepin Parks, was currently examining phosphorous levels. She commented that, in addition to City funding, it would be nice if the Watershed would contribute financially to the harvesting effort. McMillan reported that, at the mayor’s meeting, Deephaven also expressed concern about boat density on the lake. Halvorson stated that a new committee is studying the boat density study performed in the 1970’s, and will compile a new density study based on counts during lly-ovcrs at peak times this summer Murphy suggested that the City develop some type of action plan to address the numbers of trailers parking at launch sites during the .Memorial Day weekend, before the police department is bogged down writing traffic tickets over the holiday. PUBLIC CO.MMENTS Charles and Gerry Timm, 2KS5 6* Avenue North. Mr. Timm stated that his lawyer had recently received a letter from his neighbor about an Ordinance that would be in effect in the near future prohibiting him from keeping his commercial vehicle in his driveway. He asked the Council for an explanation, stating that he was merely trying to make a living as he ’d always done. Moorse explained that the City had adopted this Ordinance, and given Mr. Timm a 6 month stay, w hich will soon expire and compliance w ill be expected. He stated that he had not received any requests to reconsider the Ordinance. PAGE 3 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, April 26, 2004 7:00 o’clock p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS, Continued Sanscvere expressed his concern that this Ordinance was put into place very quickly without consideration of how it might impact this resident’s right »o make a living. While he felt keeping a commercial vehicle in a tightly packed neighborhood was inappropriate. White suggested amending the Ordinance with an acreage minimum, acknowledging that Timm has several acres. Timm stated that 5 years ago his wife contacted the City and was told that they were in compliance and allowed to keep their dump truck on their property. Now the Ordinance has suddenly changed and they have been told they are out of compliance. Moorse stated that a 5 acre minimum was applied. Gaffron stated that staff had discussed 2-5 acre minimums. He added that cither w ay, the City may not be able to resolve the issues between the two neighbors. He suggested the dump truck be kept less visible. Timm stated that the neighbor’s views are not obstructed by the truck, nor can he hardly see it. It is only when Timm drives past the neighbor’s home via an easement that it is noticed. He maintained that he had been granted a 30’ easement for a dnveway across the neighbor’s property, which the neighbor has been increasingly narrowing to 10' in order to prohibit his access via the dump truck. Sanscvere asked whether there was a potential to move the driveway. Mrs. Timm stated that the garages and dnveway are .set up to face the current access. She pointed out that they have 2 '/i acres of land and this has caused them quite a hardship. McMillan asked if others had complained about the Ordinance. Gaffron stated that, while only one has come forw ard to date, he would not be surprised that others come forward due to the recent change in the Ordinance. He acknowledged that, in the past, people w'erc told they could have these vehicles on their property, and now the new Ordinance prohibits this. White noted that the resident had been granted an easement and is not being allowed to use it to the alloned allowance. White suggested that the Council consider an Ordinance appeal until they have had adequate time to address this issue. Sansevere indicated that it seems the neighbor is taunting the Timm’s, and their attorney, with the City ’s Ordinance. Murphy asked Timm what he wished the Council to do. Timm stated that he would just like to keep his livelihood in tact. PAGE 4 of 12 ...ii MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, April 26,2004 7:00 o ’clock p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS, Continued Since there is an apparent easement issue, Murphy asked staff what it would take to get a new driveway access solely on their property. Although the expense might be too much for them, Mrs. Timm stated that the Department of Transportation would also have to accept the request. Murphy stated that the Timm's need to take a hard look at how to get off the neighbor ’s land, taking away his leverage, and the City needs to reconsider the Ordinance. Sansevere suggested the Timm’s run their driveway along the length of the easement and work with staff to figure out the details. Mayor Peterson asked staff to assemble the Ordinance information and try to obtain comment from the DOT regarding a new access to discuss at the next work session. McMillan suggested getting the two parties together to air their differences. Moorse agreed, stating that the two parties view the situation completely differently, and it would behoove them to try to mediate the problems. Sansevere pointed out that a formal action must be taken prior to May 25, when the Ordinance takes effect, to extend the grace period while they discuss the Ordinance. Mayor Peterson asked that staff keep the Timm’s pasted of extensions, meetings, and moratoriums. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT *6. #04-2968 Cl’STO.M STRUCTURES LTD., 440 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH - FINAL PLAT - RESOLUTION NO. 5159 Murphy moved, White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5159, a Resolution approving a 2-lot subdivision in the RR-IB zoning district for the property located at 440 Stubbs Bay Road North. VOTE; Aye* 5, Nays 0. 7. #04-2993 CHRIS VALERIUS AND PHIL FISK, 2377 SHADYWOOD ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REMEW, VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO, 5160 Gundlach reported that the applicants request the following to convert the existing reside.nce into a coffee shop/bakery/rcstaurant: 1. Commercial site plan review m order to obtain a building permit to construct an addition to uic existing building and to convert it from a residential use to a commercial use. 2. Parking setback variance to allow a drive through lane and parking spaces to be located within the required 30’ rear yard and within the required 20’ front yard. PAGE 5 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, April 26, 2004 7:00 o’clock p.m. 7. #04-2993 CHRIS VALERIUS AND PHIL FISK, 2377 SHADYWOOD ROAD - Continued 3. Building setback variance to allow a north side setback of 24’ when 35’ is required and 24’ currently exists. 4. Hardcover variance to permit 56% hardcover in the 500 ’-1000 ’ zone when 35% is normally allowed. 5. Conditional use penn't in order to operate a coffee shop/bakery/restaurant. While much of the Planning Commission discussion of March 15"’ centered on whether the applicant should be granted the variance needed to incorporate a drive-through, ultimately, the Commission approved the alternate site plan, which didn’t include a drive-through. For clarification, Sanscvcrc asked what the hardcover would be with and without the proposed drive-through. Gundlach pointed out that with the drive-through the hardcover is 56%; whereas, without the proposed drive-through the hardcover is 35% and a variance is unnecessary. Valcnus stated that their current drive-through plan uses pavers instead of blacktop, since they arc permeable, requires no curb and gutter, and is therefotc narrower than the ongmal dnve-through plan. She indicated that this plan would rcllect 45% hardcover, thus allowing them to retain more grcenspace and making the drive-through less conspicuous. Sansevere asked the applicant w hat heir hardship was to justify a hardcover variance. Valerius insisted that the site was a peculiar property, and the neighbor was allowed 50% hardcover. Sansevere asked w hat the hardship to their land w as. versus that of the neighbor. Valerius refened to other properties across the street which were granted greater hardcovers. Mayor Peterson stated that she did not support the neighbor’s hardcover requests, nor would she support theirs. Fisk stated that the hardship to their property is that they do not have parking close to their business, and in fact, have an easement and pay to use thr shared parking behind the residence. Since they only have two spots adjacent to their site, Fisk staled that they would like to give customers better access. Attorney Barrett concluded that in a conversion from residential to commercial, the City can require that all requirements be met. He pointed out that the property may have worked as a single family residence, but may not be appropnate as a business. Gaffron inteijcctcd, stating that it w'ould be a hardship if adequate parking was not available; however, they do have the ability to use the shared parking lot. PAGE 6 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, April 26, 2004 7:00 o ’clock p.m. 7. #04-2993 CHRIS VALERIUS AND PHIL FISK, 2377 SHADYWOOD ROAD - Comhtued Mayor Peterson confirmed among the Council that request 3, the north side setback request was not a problem. She continued, acknowledging that item 4, the hardcover request, would be unnecessary since the dnve-through was moot. Finally, item 5, although some of the Council members questioned the City’s responsibility to other businesses versus free enterpnse, seemed acceptable. Cox agreed that everyone deserves a chance to have a business; however, objected to granting the potential business owners variances to do so. Based on 19 years experience in the business, Fisk stated that they were well aware of what it takes to succeed and were not concerned about the level of risk or the economy. McMillan reiterated her concern about adequate parking. Fisk suggested signage be incorjwrated at a later date which encourages the park and ride users to park along the back row. Mayor Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt Resolution No. ^160 approving the Commercial Site Plan Review in order to obtain a building permit to construct an addition to the existing building and to convert it from residential use to commercial use: to approve the CUP to operate a coffee shop/bakery/restaurant; to deny the hardcover variance for 56% hardcover; to approve the building setback variance of 24'; and to deny the parking setback variance to allow the drive-through lane and parking spaces to be located within the required 30' rear yard and within the required 20’ front yard for the properly at 2377 Shadywood Road. NOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 2. 8. #04-2977 MIKE KEAVENY ON BEHALF OF RICHARD .M. KEAN ENY REV. TRl ST, 3425 SHORELINE DRIVE - CONDITIONAL l^SE PERMIT, CO.MMERCTAL SITE PLAN REVIEW, VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 5161 Although the applicant could not be present, Moorse relayed his wish for action on the item. White moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5161, a Resolution denying the request for a CUP approval fur a Class II restaurant, commercial site plan review, and associated variances. N’OTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Murphy stated that .Mr. Keaveny had asked the Planning Commission to provide him with a list of businesses he eould put in his building, which the Planning Commission supplied him with based on /oning code. *9. #04-2999 (iEOKt.E AND MARll.Y MILEUSNIC, 3243 CASCO CIRCLE - VAR1.\NCES - RESOLUTION NO. 5162 Murphy moved, White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5162, a Resolution granting a hardcover variance in order to rebuild their 483 s.f. deck which is rotted and to add a screened porch beneath the new deck at 3243 Casco Circle. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PAGE Soft 2 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, April 26, 2004 7:00 o’clock p.m. *10. #04-3000 WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB, 200 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW - RESOLUTION NO. 5163 Murphy moved, White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5163, a Resolution amending the original conditional use permit and subsequent site plan review to allow two minor additions to the existing building, all in conjunction with a complete renovation of the main structure located at 200 Wayzata Boulevard West. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *11. #04-3001 STEVAN AND .MARCIA TIFFANY, 1325 REST POLNT LANE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 5164 Murphy moved. White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5164, a Resolution granting lot area, lot width, and side street setback from an alley right-of-way in order to build a new single family residence at 1325 Rest Point Lane on a lot 15,425 s.f. (.35 acre) in area where 43,560 s.f. (1 acre) is required, 75' in width where 140’ is required and setback of 29’ from the alley where 35’ is required. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 12. #04-3002 G&L LAND INVESTMENT, LLC, 740 NORTH ARM DRIVE - VARIANCES Gundlach explained that the applicant requests a variance to allow an existing non-conforming accessory structure, referred to as the boathouse, to remain on the lot in conjunction with a rebuild of the principal structure. She pointed out that the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the boathouse be removed as the applicant provided no valid hardships to justify the granting of a variance. Sansevere voiced his concern that the City feels it must remove every boathouse from the lake. He argued that it is many of these boathouses that add to the charm and allure of the lake; therefore, should not all be removed. White concurred, urging staff to create an inventory of the boathouses that remain in the City in order to evaluate what is left, what is historically significant or part of our heritage, and should remain. He indicated that he was pleased that other Council members felt the same inclinations. Muiqihy agreed, though acknowledged that this particular boathouse had no significant character worth preserving. On the other hand, he stated that the son of the previous owner came to the Planning Commission Meeting and gave an impassioned plea as to why the boathouse should remain, u hich was attributed to the tact that his parents had contributed a great deal to the community of Orono. Murphy emphasized the importance of being particularly sensitive to mandating that all boathou.scs be removed or retained. (iaffron concurred, stating that the Planning Commission, too. would like to get a handle on what is out there with regard to boathouses, and begin to evaluate standards to determine which should be retained. Gaffron stated that an inventory could be accomplished relatively easily with little staff input. Sansevere suggested that the Park Commjssion be urged to mventop/ boathouses that remain. PAGE9ofI2 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, April 26, 2004 7:00 o ’clock p.m. *13. #04-3005 SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, SECTION 78-1466 - ORDINANCE NO. 6,3'‘‘ SERIES Murphy moved. White seconded, to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6,3'’* Series, a Sign Ordinance Amendment, Section 78-1466, which defines pylon and monument signs, and amends language regarding the signs allowed within Business and Industrial Districts. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *14. #04-2997 CITY OF ORONO - BIG ISLAND ACCESS - VARIANCES/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 5165 Murphy moved. White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5165, a Resolution approving the necessary variances and CUP for the proposed wetland alteration to improve Big Island access between Lots 38 and 39, Morse Island Park. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *15. ACCESSORY STRUCTURE RETENTION AGREEMENT - 25 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD NORTH Murphy moved. White seconded, to authorize the execution of an agreement that would allow the garage to remain at 25 Orono Orchard Road North. V’OTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. MAYOR/CTTY COl NCIL REPORT Mayor Peterson stated that she’d received a letter from Representative Barb Sykora ’s office offering a briefing. She asked if the Council would be interested. White stated that he would like to hear from her office, especially on issues related to education, etc. Sansevere rejwrted that the pow er squadron had inquired about removing metal from the property adjacent to theirs, which he believed was Hennepin Parks land. McMillan invited the Council members to attend a workshop Thursday evening at St. George regarding the turn back of Highway 12. Moorse indicated that he had also e.xtendcd the invitation to both Park and Planning Commissions. White questioned the apparent clear cutting along the Luce Line by the DNR. Murphy stated that he’d met with a representative from Xccl Energy about the tree ‘trimming’, and left Sieving that he made little den* in their philosophy. Essentially, they have been and will be clear cutting under and near their power lines to eradicate e.xotics and reclaiming an area 15 ’ from the power lines. McMillan added that it is the DNR’s opinion that .Xcel is doing them a favor by removing exotics, but many other varieties are being impacted as well. She stated that she was tembly concerned about the cedar and spruce along the Luce Line. PAGE 10 of 12 iteuiluiui lUyuliili^l^iaii MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, April 26,2004 7:00 o’clock p.m. MAYOR/Cn'Y COUNCIL REPORT, Continued White suggested that the newspapers get out to the trail and take before and after pictures of the clear cutting. He asked whether the cities had any control over this. Murphy stated that the clear cutting began in Wayzata and the City Hall fielded many calls regarding this issue. While the paper reported that tree trimming would ensue, no one picnired the level of clear cutting which would be the result. PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR’S REPORT - There was none. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT *16. ORONO WOODS NON-PROFIT SUBSTITUTION - RESOLUTION NO. 5166 .Murphy moved. White seconded, to adopt RESOLl'TION NO. 5166 authorizing the substitution of owner, and authorizing the .Mayor and City Clerk to sign the required documents. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *17. MHFA REFUND Murphy moved. White seconded, to approve the refund of $8,400 of unused grant funds to MHFA. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 18. CREDIT CARD POLICY Murphy expressed his concern with regard to credit card deals that go astray. He suggested that the City finance department review the policy and set certain limits. Moorsc stated that the credit card will be used for background checks mostly and should never really have to leave the office. He indicated that a limit would be set and that the fmance department would be responsible for any reviews. Murphy moved, White seconded, to approve and adopt the Credit Card Policy, as presented. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT Attorney Barrett reported on pending litigation to the Council in a closed S minute session 19. LICENSES SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT 1.Applicant: Gear West Ski & Bike Event: Run/Bike/Run Location: Orono School Grounds and Surrounding Areas as designated on map Date: Sunday, May 23, 2004 Time: 7:00 a.m. - 1 1 :30 a.m. Murphy moved. White seconded, to approve all licenses. VOTE: Ayes 5. .Nays 0. PACiF. It nft? J r ju MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday. April 26,2004 7:00 o’clock p.m. *20. BILLS Murphy moved, White seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adjourn the Orono City Council Meeting of April 26, 2004 at 9:38 P.M. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ATTEST: Linda S. Vce, City Clerk Barbara Peterson, Mayor PAOF 12 of 12 COliii'lLL 04-3003 3250 Fox Street N S J V Memorandum Date: To: From: RE: May 6,2004 City Administrator, Mayor and Council Janice Gundlach, City Planner Preliminary Plat of 3250 Fox Street - File /^04>3003 Attached is an engineering report from Schoell & Madson, Inc. conducted for David Maass, eastern adjacent neighbor of 32S0 Fox Street. Mr. Maass has some concerns regarding runoff from the development of proposed Lot 3. City Engineer, Tom Kellogg, in reviewing the Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan, has visited the Maass property to familiarize himself with the drainage problems within the area. The comments contained in the attached letter have been incorporated into the attached revised Resolution, under #2 of conditions, for preliminary plat approval. The applicants have been mailed a copy of this revised Resolution. rv 06 04 09:52«952-546-9065 P-2 Schoell & Madson, Inc. Engineering • Surveying • Planning Soil Testing • Environmental Services WWW. schoellmadson. com April 3, 2004 Mr. Mike Gaffron Director of Planning and Zoning City of Orono 2750 Kelly Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Subject:Plan Review Comments for Maxwell Bay Estates Project Orono, MN Dear Mr. Gaffron: On behalf of Dave Maass, I am forwarding my comments to you regarding the Maxwell Bay Estates project. On April 27,2004,1 visited the Dave Maass residence, observed the drainage way on his property and looked at the proposed house site on Lot 3 of the Maxwell Bay Estates project. Based on that site visit, the following comments were prepared. Comments listed are from a civil engineering viewpoint. Erosion on the Maass property caused by additional runoff from a new house on Lot 3 is a concern. The existing drainage way through the Maass property is susceptible to increased erosion from additional runoff, as is the forest “floor” that does not have good vegetative ground cover. The new roof, patios, lawn areas, and driveway of a large house will generate significant amounts of runoff. The woods surrounding the house are especially sensitive to these changes in runoff quantities and volumes. My recommendations to prevent runoff damage to the Maass property from runoff generated by this project are: 1. 2. 3. Direct ail the runoff from the new driveway around to the west, around the new house as shown on the Gronberg grading plan dated 4/14/04. Gutter drain the roof and direct the drainage to the west and to the proposed dry pond. Route new front yard lawn, sidewalk and side and back yard drainage in a new swale along the east side of the property. aysssa? Opportuoit, Enwtw 10560 Wiyzia BoulMard, Suite 1 • Miivweporie, MN SS305-158S 06 04 09tS2a 652-546-9065 p.3 Sdioell & IS/ladson. Inc. Mr. Mike Gaffron Page 2 May 3. 2004 These are not major Items, however, the woods In this area are part of a fragile environment and deserve to be treated as such. I appreciate your attention to this matter. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to give me a call. Very truly yours. SCHOELL & MADSON. INC. John Karwacki JRK/cj oc: Dave Maass FACAROLEJVwor«Jahn04VOfeno. Otjr or.903.dog A, . A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A CLASS 111 SUBDIVISION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3250 FOX STREET FILE NO. 04-3003 f WHEREAS, Bruce Paddock and Kristine Paddock, husband and wife, with George W. Stickney (hereinafter the “subdividers ”) on March 17, 2004, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a three lot residential plat of property legally described as: Tract E, R.L.S. NO. 1358, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter “the property”); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono’s Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 19, 2004, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on May 10, 2004, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of the subdivider noting the following findings of fact: 1.The property is located within the LR - lA One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2.The property contains a total of approximately 14.830 acres of land; 0.13 acres of which is delineated wetland. 3.The proposed plat consists of three residential lots each meeting the minimum lot standard requirements of the LR - lA, One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District, each meeting the minimum 2 acre lot area requirements and each having over 200 ’ in defined width at the shoreline and 75’ lake setback. A single family residence currently exists within proposed lot 2, served by a septic system straddling the boundary between lots 1 and 2. Page 1 of 6 6.The average lakeshore setback line shown on the preliminary plat shall be the line used to define the average lakeshore setback for all 3 lots. 7.If the existing mound on lots 1 and 3 is proposed to remain in use during the interim period, a temporary easement, expiring at the time of site grading for proposed lot 1, may be permitted but only by approval of the City. 8.The subdivider shall implement all currently provided or forthcoming recommendations of the City Engineer regarding grading, drainage, stormwater management and site improvcmens. 9.The developer shall comply with all requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 10.Subdivider is hereby advised that preliminary subdivision approval will expire within one year of the date of City Council approval. May 10,2005. Should the subdivider fail to complete the filing of the final plat application within the year deadline, it shall be necessary for the subdivider to file a new preliminary subdivision application with the City. Final Plat Submittab: The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled City Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. These submittals are as follows: 1.Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies (one copy for the City’s records and one for filing with Hennepin County) and one (1) copy reduced to 1” = 200 ’. Drawings to include: a.Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Mark Gronberg of Gronberg & Associates, Inc., dated March 1,2004 and revised 4-12-04 and 4-14-04. b. Dedication of drainage and utility easements 10’ wide along the exterior boundaries of property and S’ along the internal lot lines. c. The naming of plat. Page 3 of 6 2. Legal documents required: 4. a. Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b. The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded casements currently affecting the property. c. Signed and executed Developer ’s Agreement and letter of credit required for site improvements. d. Signed and executed Drainage Easements to be taken over drainage way and detention areas within plat. Fees n be paid: Total due: $530.00 a. Final plat fee = $250.00 b. Legal review and filing fees for subdivison and associated documents = $280.00 c. *Park Dedication Fee: amount shall be determined as soon as City Assessor has placed a fair market value on the undeveloped land at the time of preliminary plat approval. The subdivider shall be advised as soon as Assessor’s report has been filed with '^itv. d. Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fee = $ 32,400 [12.0 acres (maximum of 4.00 chargable acres per lot @ $2,700/acrc] Stormwater plan approval/permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Page 4 of6 fU 1 A Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 10“ day of May, 2004. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ^ The^ foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10“ day of September,y004 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota '' mt^cipal ^rporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of _______, 2004 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page S of S Date Application Received: 3-17-04 Date Application Considered as Complete: 4-14-04 60-Day Review Period Expires: 8-12-U4 MAY 1 0 2004 City of OHOfvo REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: Mav 2. 2004 Item No.: Department Approval: Name: Janice Gundlacli^ Title: City Planner Administrator Approvai:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #04-3003, Bruce and Kris Paddock & George W. Stickncy, 3250 Fox Street - Preliminary Plat Resolution Zoning District: Lot Area: Lot Width: LR - 1 A, One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 acre minimum) 14.830 acres (645,995 s.f.) Approximately 834 feet List of Exhibits A - Resolution per Planning Commission Recommendation B - PC Action Notice 4-21-04 C - PC Memo and Exhibits of 4-15-04 Application Summary: Applicant requests preliminary plat approval to create 3 lots on one block at 3250 Fox Street to be known as Maxwell Bay Estates. Sta/f Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following stipulations: 1. Only two new driveways are proposed on the private section of Fox Street and proposed lot 3 must use the existing driveway that exists outside the Fox Street gates. 2. Proposed lots 1 and 2 should utilize the septic sites on the street side of the proposed house pads rather than the lake side sites. 3. The average lakeshore setback line shown on the preliminary plat shall be the line used to determine the average lakeshore setback for all 3 lots, not an average setback that is determined by when which lots construct houses. 4. If the existing mound is proposed to stay during the interim period, a temporary easement, expiring at the time of site grading for proposed lot 1. may be permitted but only by approval of the City. 5. Implementation of the recommendations of the City Engineer. 6. Compliance with the requirements of the Minneha^ Creek Watershed District. 7. Submission and approval of the final plat. 8. Payment of standard fees and dedication of required easements. 9. Review by the Park Commission prior to City Council review. L. fl- Planniog Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission voted 7*0 at their meeting held April 19,2004 to approve the preliminary plat consistent with the staff recommendation noted above. Staff Recommendation Approval per the attached Resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached Resolution granting preliminary plat approval for 3250 Fox Street. A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A CLASS Ili SUBDIVISION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3250 FOX STREET FILE NO. 04-3003 WHEREAS, Bruce Paddock and Kristine Paddock, husband and wife, with George W. Stickney (hereinafter the “subdividers”) on March 17, 2004, filed a fonnal subdivision application with the City for approval of a three lot residential plat of property legally described as: Tract E, R.L.S. NO. 1358, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter “the property”); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono’s Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 19, 2004, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on May 10, 2004, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of the subdivider noting the following findings of fact: 1. The property is located within the LR - lA One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2. The property contains a total of approximately 14.830 acres of land; 0.13 acres of which is delineated wetland. 3. The proposed plat consists of three residential lots each meeting the minimum lot standard requirements of the LR - lA, One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District, each meeting the minimum 2 acre lot area requirements and each having over 200’ in defined width at the shoreline and 75’ lake setback. A single family residence currently exists within proposed lot 2, serv'ed by a septic system straddling the boundary between lots 1 and 2. Page 1 of 5 4. All lots will be served with septic systems and private wells. 5.Lot 3 will be served off the existing drive access from the public portion of Fox Street. 6.Lots 1 and 2 will be served off private driveways accessed from the private portion of Fox Street. 7.Several primary and alternate septic sites meeting all pertinent standards have been identified for each of proposed Lots 1,2, and 8.It would be appropriate to establish a single average setback line for all 3 lots to avoid having an average setback line that changes each time one of the lots is built on. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat application of Bruce and Kristine Paddock and George W. Stickney at 3250 Fox Street per preliminary plat drawings by Mark Gronberg of Gronberg & Associates, Inc., dated March 1, 2004 and revised 4-12-04 and 4-14-04, subject to the following conditions: 1.The developer shall grant to the City 10 foot drainage and utility easements along perimeter property boundaries and S foot drainage and utility easements along all interior property boundaries. 2. Payment of standard Park Dedication Fee for Lots 1 and 3. 3. 4. Payment of standard storm water and drainage trunk fee for the property. For proposed lots 1 and 2, the developer is encouraged to utilize the septic sites on the street side of the proposed house pads rather than the lake side sites, to reduce the potential for negative lake impacts. 5.The average lakeshore setback line shown on the preliminary plat shall be the line used to define the average lakeshore setback for all 3 lots. 6.If the existing mound on lots 1 and 3 is proposed to remain in use during the interim period, a temporary easement, expiring at the time of site Page 2 of 5 i grading for proposed lot 1, may be permitted but only by approval of the City. 7.The subdivider shall implement all currently provided or forthcoming recommendations of the City Engineer regarding grading, drainage, stormwater management and site improvemens. 8.The developer shall comply with all requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 9.Subdivider is hereby advised that preliminary subdivision approval will expire within one year of the date of City Council approval. May 10,2005. Should the subdivider fail to complete the filing of the final plat application within the year deadline, it shall be necessary for the subdivider to file a new preliminary subdivision application with the City. Final Plat Submittals: The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled City Council meeting on the recond and fourth Mondays of the month. These submittals are as follows; 1.Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies (one copy for the City’s records and one for filing with Hennepin County) and one (1) copy reduced to 1” = 200 ’. Drawings to include: a. Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Mark Gronberg of Gronberg & Associates, Inc., dated March 1,2004 and revised 4-12-04 and 4-14-04. b. Dedication of drainage and utility easements 10’ wide along the exterior boundaries of property and 5’ along the internal lot lines. c. The naming of plat. 2. Legal documents required: Page 3 of 5 i 4. a. Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b. The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c. Signed and executed Developer’s Agreement and letter of credit required for site improvements. d. Signed and executed Drainage Easements to be taken over drainage way and detention areas within plat. 3. Fees to be paid:Total due: $530.00 a. Final plat fee = $250.00 b. Legal review and filing fees for subdivison and associated documents = $280.00 c. *Park Dedication Fee: amount shall be determined as soon as City Assessor has placed a fair market value on the undeveloped land at the time of preliminary plat approval. The subdivider shall be advised as soon as Assessor’s report has been filed with City. d. Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fee = $ 32,400 [12.0 acres (maximum of 4.00 chargable acres per lot @ $2,700/acre] Stormwater plan approval/permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Page 4 of 5 I Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 10‘" day of May, 2004. ATTEST: Linda S. Vce, City Clerk Barbara Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10'*’ day of September, 2004 by Barbena A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENT4EPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of , 2004 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of S CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 (952) 249-4600 ZONING FILE: 04-3003 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: April 21, 2004 TO:Bruce & Kris Paddock 2700 E Medicine Lake Pkwy Plymouth, MN 55441 COPIES:George W. Stickney 2590 Countryside Drive Orono, MN 55356 TYPE OF APPUCATION:..........Jjat DATE OF MEETING: April 19. 2004 Planning Commission recommended as follows: To approve the following staff recommendation with the noted minor wording revisions: 1. Only two new driveways are proposed on the private section of Fox Street and proposed lot 3 must use the existing driveway that exists outside the Fox Street gates. 2. Proposed lots 1 and 2 should (not must) utilize the septic sites on the street side of the proposed house pads rather than the lake side sites. 3. The average lakeshore setback line shown on the preliminary plat shall be the line used to determine the average lakeshore setback for all 3 lots, not an average setback that is determined by when which lots construct houses. 4. If the existing mound is proposed to stay during the interim period, a temporary easement, expiring at the time of site grading for proposed lot I. may be permitted but only by approval of the City. 5. Implementation of the recommendations of the City Engineer. 6. Implementation of the recommendations of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 7. Submission and approval of the final plat. 8. Payment of standard fees and dedication of required easements. 9. Review by the Park Commission prior to City Council review. VOTE:FOR 0 AGAINST Applicant’s next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council - Monday, May 10,2004; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission or Council minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission or Council. If you have questions, please call City Planner Janice Gundlach at 952-249-4623. J M4-3003 April 19, 2004 Page 1 of 6 Date Application Received: 3>17-04 Date Appiication Conildered as Compicte: 4-14-04 120-Day Review Period Expires: 8-12-04 To:Chair Mabusth and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Janice Gundlach, City PlannerJ^ Date:April 15.2004 Subject:04-3003, Bruce and Kris Paddock and George W. Stickney, 3250 Fox St. - Preliminary Plat ■ Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: LR - I A, One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 acre min.) 14.830 acres (645,995 s.f.) Application Summary: Applicant requests preliminary plat approval to create 3 lots on one block at 3250 Fox Street to be known as Maxwell Bay Estates. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following stipulations: 1. Only two new driveways arc proposed on the private section of Fox Street and proposed lot 3 must use the existing driveway that exists outside the Fox Street gates. 2. Proposed lots I and 2 must utilize the septic sites on the street side of the proposed house pads rather than the lake side sites. 3. The average lakeshore setback line shown on the preliminary plat shall be the line used to determine the average lakeshore setback for all 3 lots, not an average setback that is determined by when which lots construct houses. 4. If the existing mound is proposed to stay during the interim period, a temporary easement, expiring at the time of site grading for proposed lot I, may be permitted but only by approval of the City. 5. Implementation of the recommendations of the City Engineer. 6. Implementation of the recommendations of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 7. Submission and approval of the final plat. 8. Payment of standard fees and dedication of required easements. 9. Review by the Park Commission prior to City Council review. Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections Sec. 78-305. Area, height, lot width and yard requirements. (a) Height. No structure or building in the LR-1A district shall exceed 21/2 stories or 30 feet in height except as provided in section 78-1366. (b) Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed: k 3 \i uiilliil W04-3003 April 19,2004 Pige 2 of 6 Lot Area (acre)Ut Width (feet)Front Yard (feet)Side Yard (feet)Side Yard Adjacent to Street (feet) 2 200 50 30 50 Rear Yard (feet) List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Proposed Site Plan Exhibit C - Proposed Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control and Septic Plan Exhibit D — Drainage Areas Pre and Post Development Exhibit E - Memo from Septic Inspector Matt Bolterman dated 3-25-04 Exhibit F - Wetland Boundary Map Exhibit G - National Wetland Inventory Exhibit H - Hennepin County Soil Survey Exhibit I - MCWD Comments dated 1-22-04 Exhibit J - Resolution Denying the Request to Conduct an EAW Exhibit K - Aerial Photograph Exhibit L - Neighbor Comments Exhibit M - Property Owner’s List Exhibit N - Plat Msqi Background This site was given preliminary approval by the Planning Commission on November 17, 2003. The plat preliminarily included 6 lots with a private roadway meeting all Zoning Ordinance regulations. As part of the Planning Commission's recommendation final engineering approval would ^ required prior to City Council review. During that period in between Planning Commission’s approval and City Council review the neighborhood petitioned the City to require preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (known as an EAW). The applicants then withdrew their application for a 6 lot plan due to the neighborhood resistance and, in turn, the neighborhood’s petitioner withdrew the EAW petition. As a formality the City denied the request to conduct an EAW based on the findings included in the resolution attached as Exhibit J, including withdrawals by both parties. The applicants are now proposing a 3 lot plan with private driveways instead of a roadway. The application has been given a new number and is considered a new application because the applicants officially withdrew their 6 lot plan. PRELIMINARY PLAT ANALYSIS Introduction and Conformance with Comprehensive Plan Bruce and Kris Paddock along with George W. Stickney are requesting preliminary plat approval for a 3 lot subdivision at 3250 Fox Street. The property is located at the southwest corner of Fox Street and Leaf Street. The current zoning on the property is LR - 1 A, One Family Lakeshore Residential District which requires two acre minimum lot si2es. The property is guided for Rural Residential in 2000 - 2020 Land Use Plan requiring a minimum lot size of two acres. Conformance with Zoning Ordinance The proposed lots meet all Zoning Ordinance regulations with respect to area, width, and i. i i I i i ^ i i «^04-3003 April 19,2004 Page 3 of6 setbacks. The following table outlines setbacks from the proposed building pad locations (future buyers will not be required to use the exact building pad locations shown on the plans, but rather the City just wanted confirmation that reasonable sized homes could fit on the lots): LR-IA Lot Area Lot Width (at road) Lot Width (at shoreline) Street Setback Lake Setback Required 2.0 aces N/A 200 ’ 50’ 75’ Lot 1 (building pad: 45x100) 5.00 acres (all dry)* 209 ’ 217 ’ 585’ 500’ Lot 2 (building pad: 50x100) 5.34 acres (all dry)* 224 ’ 217 ’ 170 ’ 365’ Lot 3 (building pad: 50x100) 4.13 acres (.13 wet, 4.00 dry)* 261’ 200* 780 ’ 215’ *the dry vs. wet acreage will have to be amended so that the area in the dry pond below the outlet level is considered wet. This will not affect whether the lots are conforming in area as they are twice as large as the Zoning District requires. Surrounding Development The preliminary plat to be known as Maxwell Day Estates is surrounded by residential property in all directions with Maxwell Bay of Lake Minnetonka to the direct south. Two acre minimum lot sizes with LR - 1A zoning are to the west, east and northwest with two acre minimum lot sizes with RR - ID zoning to the northeast. A church is located two parcels to the north. The applicants’ property is located off a private section of Fox Street with lots larger than two acres, although existing two acre lots can be found to the northwest and northeast. Lot Layout and Standards The plan in Exhibit C shows driveway locations in relation to the proposed property line layout. Three lots are proposed to be served off individual private driveways. Proposed Lot 3 will use the existing driveway that exits just outside the entrance monuments to the private section of Fox Street and proposed lots 1 and 2 will be served off the private section inside the gates. The driveways for proposed lots I and 2 are located within 40 ’ of each other due to site distance issues. Due to the low volume of traffic on this portion of Fox Street staff does not find that this will be of issue. The future buyers will not be required to use the exact driveway locations for proposed lots 1 and 2, although the 20’ setback for septic sites to driveways and the topography of the lots, the driveway locations will be very close to those shown on the preliminary plat plans. Proposed lot 3 will be required to keep the existing driveway cut that accesses onto the public portion of Fox Street Although, ideally the driveway would be best served inside the private gates, the topography, drainage of the lot, and existing wetland make the existing location most suitable. Future buyers should make attempts to locate the driveways in a manner that minimally disturbs the existing trees. 1 « r •. **•...111 t K Iiiii li M t /; #04-3003 April t9,2004 Page 4 of6 The plan in Exhibit C also shows building pad locations in relation to the required setbacks and primary and alternate septic locations. The applicants have shown that an adequate house can be placed on these lots and staff is satisfied with the lot layouts as proposed. These lots meet all required lot standards as shown in the table above and actually far exceed the required standards. The plan in Exhibit C also shows the average lakeshore setback line. Due to the location of the existing houses on both sides of the lot, the three proposed lots will be subject to a strict average lakeshore setback. The average lakeshore setback ranges from over 400 ’ on proposed lot 1 to 135 ’ on proposed lot 3. The building pad locations have been determined in relation to this setback line. Staff recommends that this line be adopted as the average setback for ail 3 lots and that the issue of which home gets built first will not affect the average setback for the rest. City Engineer Tom Kellogg has not submitted written comments regarding the proposed plans at this time. The City Engineer has been in contact with the surveyor regarding the methods of rate control of stormwater pre and post development and the methods the applicants are proposing to collect stormwater horn the site and ha.<; preliminarily approved the concept. However, the applicant will be required to meet all recommendations of the City Engineer prior to City Council review. Required Easements The applicant must dedicate the following easements: - Conservation and Flowage Easements over all delineated wetlands. - Drainage Easements over all proposed storm water ponds and stormwater collection areas (including the dry ponds proposed). - Standard drainage and utility easements around all lot boundaries. This consists of 10 ’ around the plat boundary lot lines and 5’ on the interior lot lines. Storm Water, Drainage, and Erosion Control The applicant is proposing a dry pond with a small berm and draintile approximately 80 feet from the lake on both interior lot lines. All lots will meet the required 2.0 acres of dry with these collection areas. All storm water will be routed to these areas through the method of swale construction along the property lines. The neighbor to the east submitted a letter expressing concerns regarding drainage (see Exhibit K). Also, attached are per and post drainage area maps showing the distribution of stormwater (Exhibit D). The City Engineer has not submitted written comments regarding the storm water and drainage plan at this time however, the applicant will be required to implement all recommendations of the City . ngineer prior to City Council review. The applicant has also proposed temporary and permanent erosion control measures which must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. At a minimum, silt fence will be required. The subdivision is subject to the Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fee established by ♦ • •* 1 »’ J 3 f 1 I ii I 1^04.3003 April 19,2004 Pages of6 City Ordinance. The fee is established at $2,700 per acre, with a cap of 4.0 acres to be charged per lot. For this property, 3 4-acre+ lots are being created. Each would be charged a fee of (4.0 acres x $2,700 = $10,800 x 3 lots = $32,400 for a total fee). Tree Preservation The applicant has not submitted a tree preservation plan but has indicated that a private tree preservation covenant will be established under the title of all three lots. The Zoning Ordinance doesn ’t regulate tree preservation thus staff is satisfied with the applicants willingness to establish covenants privately. Archaeological Impacts The only historically significant features on the property, known to staff, are the entrance monuments, gates, and wall located at the read frontage. The applicants are proposing to preserve these features. If the applicant has not already done so, the State Historical Preservation Office (SHPO) should be contacted to inquire as to the need for an archaeological review to determine the possibility of American Indian burial mounds. Sewage Treatment Copies of the proposed septic plans were submitted with the preliminary plat. Septic inspector Matt Bolterman has reviewed the proposed septic plans and his comments can be found in the attached memorandum dated, March 25, 2004 (Exhibit E). He is recommending approval of the proposed septic systems, although proposed lots 1 and 2 should make every effort to utilize the septic sites on the street side of the proposed home rather than the lake side. Proposed lot 3 will be forced to use the septic sites on the lake side of the proposed home location due to the topography not yielding any other acceptable sites. It should be noted that all the sites shown on the plan meet both city and state requirements. The property is within the MUSA and staff is exploring the potential of providing sewer to the property. Elimination of septic systems would provide greater site flexibility. Park Dedication The property does not abut any public roads except at the very NE comer and does not abut any of the existing or proposed public trails shown on the City’s Comprehensive Trail Plan. A future trail is planned along the public portion of Fox Street. This subdivision proposal will be submitted to the Park Conunission for their review in early May, to determine whether land dedication is required or merely a park fee for the two new lots (Park Fee would be $5,550 per lot). Interim Period Plaiming Department staff have spoken to a potential buyer of proposed lots 2 and 3. This potential buyer has indicated that the existing house will be lived in for a period of time until a new house on lot 2 is constructed (lot 3 will remain vacant). Because the current mound (new in 1996) for the septic system overlaps onto lot 1. and because the potential buyer doesn ’t want to be forced to remove that system until a new house is built, the Planning Commission should consider allowing a temporary easement over the 4. M-;J- ? I. V - I I 1 i I 1 1 1 I i I i I m4.3003 April 19,2004 Pagc6«f6 mound system that overlaps onto lot I until lot 2 constructs a new home. This would have to include willingness of the future owner of lot 1. Staff does not find this to be problematic assuming the easement automatically expires at a defined time ^proved by the City. It should be noted however, the driveway locations for lots 1 and 2 may force removd of the mound earlier than construction of a home on lot 1. The Planning Commission should discuss if they are comfortable allowing a temporary easement, approved by the City, until any site grading occurs (including a driveway for lot 1). Issues for Consideration 1. Should the applicants be required to use the septic site located on the street side of the proposed house pads rather than the sites on the lake side even though they meet state standards? 2. Should proposed lot 3 be required to use the existing driveway that exists outside the private gates of Fox Street? 3. Should a temporary easement, during the interim period, be permitted for the cunent mound overlapping onto proposed lot 1? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following stipulations: 1. Only two new driveways are proposed on the private section of Fox Street and proposed lot 3 must use the existing driveway that exists outside the Fox Street gates. 2. Proposed lots 1 and 2 iftliHlt^utilize the septic sites on the street side of the proposed house pads rather than the lake side sites. 3. The average lakeshore setback line shown on the preliminary plat shall be the line used to determine the average lakeshore setback for all 3 lots, not an average setback that is determined by when which lots construct houses. 4. If the existing mound is proposed to stay during the interim period, a temporary easement, expiring at the time of site grading for proposed lot 1, may be permitted but only by approval of the City. 5. Implementation of the recommendations of the City Engineer. 6. Implementation of the recommendations of the Miwehaha Creek Watershed District. 7. Submission and approval of the fmal plat. 8. Payment of standard fees and dedication of required easements. 9. Review by the Park Commission prior to City Council review. . • : lAU i-la* i ilMiiiii ».i a !l.| i j • j.. i ifiiiiiinfirAaV aiT 'A City of Orono Subdivision Application EXHIBIT A Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Main: 952-249-4600 fax: 952-249-4616 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 This application form must be completed in full. Application # 0 Date Received: ?t ~X Amount Paid: P.-u . Staff : -Tj. r. I .-,1^ _______ Fee: Renewal: 'v.-'f PROPERTY INFORMATION: - J Site Address: _______3'7-S'O io>'- sJrr._______c Property Identification Number (PIN); _______________________________________________ (Attach legal description to application if not included on the sun/ey.) Date Property Acquired (month/year); ________ □ Abstract or □ Torrens, please check, one Present use of property: □ Residential □ Other Zoning District: _________ ~ ' " APPLICANT INFORMATION:, (Complex,! Name; q Phone (home): Address: ________________________ Email: I. (Cotnplete,leMl narnfes and marital s^s rMuired for each^intecested party) /fV* M’ fo^r}h ' y _____ ________Phone { - -fk):L^ "q - ^ Q %-Ji < ^ ________________________________________<*:o Va-//•., r-. ,./j Fax; S'2^ V JWNER INFORMATION: (Complete legal names and marital status required for each interested party) ^ Name: py me (home): Address; __ Email: Phone (work); EXISTING LAND USE: Number of Tax Parcels: Development Size; Fax: / / ^ Acres Dry Land . 3 Acres Wet Land /W. Acres TOTAL, all parcels Present Use (check one) Present Zoning District 'S' Residential: Number of Units: / 4iot^ *2^ □ Othe’’: (Specify) /-A - / ------------------------ Proposal: □ Division for Tax Purposes □ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) S Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites / Existing Units __New Units __Total Units Units per lj4.rS AcresProposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check)'Q Residential □ Other (specify) -10- Square Feet Dry Buildable Land i i ikJ i ^ MINIMUM MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (refer to '‘application fees" listed below). 2. Completed application form. 3. Preliminary plat information on Certificate of Survey. ^ Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department o Finance, Government Center, A-603 300 South e ”' Street, Minneapolis, telephone 612-348-5910). g As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. MINIMUM MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE FINAL APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (refer to Preliminary Subdivision Approval resolution and park fees if applicable). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. APPLICATION FEES (Zoning Administrator to check (X) those which apply) A. Application Base Fees: ___ Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) J350 00 ___ Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement $600.00 Subdivision Application (Class 1 & II) $600.00 _ i« • m ^ ^ ^ ^_________ TOTALS 21 Preliminary Subdivision Application $750 00 + $30 00/lot (Class III & all non-residential) __ Final Plat Application (Class III) $250.00 __ Legal Review and Filing; Subdivision only $140.00 Subdivision w/easements and covenants; minimum $280.00 + any additional costs Park Fees (to be determined per Section 82-227) Legal and Engineering Review Pees (as incurred) Renewal of Class I, II, & III Subdivision and of a Lot Line Rearrangement Application $300.00 B. Special Improvement Fees: ___ Proposed Private Roads $650.00 + $ 50 per lineal foot; ___ Proposed Public Roads $950.00 ♦ $.50 per lineal foot; Jin. ft. X .50 = $. lin. ft. X .50 * $ Request for City to Accept Existing Private Road $950.00 Proposed Sanitary Sewer Main Extension $275.00 + $25/stub Proposed Watermain Extension $275.00 $25/stub Proposed Storm Sewer System (excluding culverts) $250.00 On-Site System, Site Evaluabon Review (applicable to rural subdivisions) $60/per lot x new lots C. Flexible Application Fees/Miscellaneous Fees ___Variance $600.00 ------Vacation of Public Road $75 per benefiting property ($600 minimum per application) ___ Easement Vacation Associated with a Subdivision $100.00 ___ PRD Application with Subdivision $35.00 per dwelling unit pie applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by Planning Department Staff, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process ‘his application and further agree^ pay m additional fees established,by ordinance. ^ aUAApplicant's Signature: ^ Owner's Signature: 'M 07-. Applicant must have all submittals into the City Office 25 days before the Planning Commission meeting. Planning Commission meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized to ^ m^tin^ advise the City Planner assigned to your project of this change prir -11-rJ i //. ,> C ; V'. . •4 • • 1^. ^ jw: eoE^ SsQ OZ COCl, ^ CO . l§2®iz w^M§ o<S6b-^ i£oSh: lOD ^ w l«Ci5fc,zrmfeg EXHIBIT B • f. m * ^ tn . ?Z‘/’ S SSwiS OujO . ^ oujOo^vnaoow^o %i 'H(t:i5^i?. .iV^-;) it- ® ta ‘ON 0Mtat •8L9»>I>—--------^~~~-4 V \ / '7 'Ta Sii - \ ' ^'’) Vt I ■\~--/~J iTn'iTi—r~ s fm f / \ . kM «M a^s I i i A I jiii-ii iiiiiili 21- ill I EXHIBIT D .. CO -J < I»— -J «J ^ CO Oujuj >zr^ >-cro y I z o -j OUJOo^i/'ooooj^cn CO X TT^ / XZ^$mtf0 ^ ^6JD9j^^Q0%MXr]?•* 1 I ^ * "fI _ u ■ _ ' " ^ ^ ^ f N ;\ V * y>^ ---------Tr“ ----". '>'^-'-~--V-“-V ~7'^----------------_-r_---------y ^ ■ — — —-----^-----------I .1 ^ W/yy^'Z ~fte:i^?vT77^Trr —■ — — ^ fe ■<N7''X:-Kf"'-r-' y ^ / m^m W iSip ' \\' r ^ \ \ \ \« r \ w V,' /_ \ / /"/ ..S^Pb- V' "r* -^. - ^ I \ ^-T^^ \'' i i '4 c AiA^. iii.iJ. \W s •V S,'I ' \ / // cJS s?? /J “• 2 1 =3gaS^ cJi2£ ^ S“ ::o ssS ^“-“cJ, O >. 03 C_5 u 7 Q- .5 iZ 'm mi V- ft ^15 5 «S Ui W ^ ►- <1^ I nil } EXHIBIT E t • % CITY of ORONO Municipal Ofllces Strati Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN SS356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 TO: FROM: Janice Gundlach Matt Bolterman, On-Site Systems Manager/ DATE:March 25,2004 SUBJECT: Septic Review for Maxwell Bay Estates (3 lots) The property is proposed to be split into three lots. One of the lots has an existing house on it and the other two lots are vacant. The lot with the existing house currently has a code septic system that will be half on lot I and lot 2. If the current house will be continued to be lived in they will have to put in a new septic system that is on their property. The new septic system can be reused if they rebuild the house a future time. I recommend getting the septic sites as far from Lake Minnetonka as possible. Lot 1 The two septic sites by the lake should not be used. There is a site located on the north end of the property and testing should be done to find another site either just south of the building setback line or fmd another site north of where the house will go. Both sites north of the building setback line would be preferred. Lot 2 The two septic sites by the lake should not be used. There are 2 septic sites located north of the existing house that should be used. The septic site located furdiest from the house must be centered on the knob. Lot 3 The only septic locations on this lot are the two near Lake Mirmetonka. Septic code requires septic to be at least 75 feet from Lake Minnetonka. Both septic sites meet this requirement. Tdepb (952) 24M600 • Fax (952) 2494614 , w«w,cLoroiKuiin.u , | I I« • I • •*iii 4I li iiuiaiia jcai 23-0066 i MIIIU I i XT' ^ » r <r \ •**• Ht* ‘ < m err ■ x 1^ it ^ jJ s^' - ■ :^: i/ i •, / V I > ■ .‘i •r^V* ■ if/'t ■ ••m iS ’firr'tm vci,■t • 4* * - A*.•1.*:•A^?v'-‘' ui<‘- '^’ .-c .. V-- V, .4 nd lat to icy ika the ine line ‘ 'u '*•”■’ ‘ • . ' ‘ r.* ir .» '.• VV'.- - V;'., Itil ••'•■' / v.,-.>. V .'\* •’■•< I.* •■■ t s' 1 . >''•■'* ■• ^ <)■;•* A .. . ■• 4 \V''V35^'"i■-*•’: ’;,Vv ^V-.v . ■ ^Vr-' :•' •;:: •■■;iX ■ . V-‘.’ >. "VoV ‘ -' V' tJiTr ■■ ■ ,;,:> . f . <»■ - * ■ •; ■’ -•‘I't' ■ . "} :.^-^rV■• ;.•■■■ V • / H’ 9 • i^. I ■•* 4 ^ f :• Al* r « r.r— V Pk "^'j fe'iia -J ■A j ‘the axd sptic I V ^ ’4 i f ^ ^\\ 1 i ,K''liSVOBODA Approximate Wetland Boundary Ovorlayed on 1991 Aerial Plioto V . ^ . * , V » . A: ; r."X VVr-* .a I V. S.jf-’-p’u po nt LcC4;t\/p t'rf=. Iw: '•- . r;/ ’ ••L->^v>. A\;‘Jl- :.>4:.." «r 'V. -^:,.■ ■, •'* A‘>• •* r - \ •S.^ -.' > •: ' V . V ^ ^ A.v--‘. u ■r k if .kJ undary Photo , f-!! - \r ^ ■ V : •-■ . ^ r'*;«A.:..>? I ■:’-«4; s -mm. i§ii ■.?' > ■ ■ ■d_j»>'A >Vt^, . 1^ r.W;. I?1 [wmM W^i >? •• > Ni • *Vn.^3?jp 'V *>v^ ; ^ *• -jj 3 I -<3K7^ Ml '4f >fVs • ^ /' -' ^ t ^ i ^’v r>^^ j,. ..,=#, : ;y5i? .- ■•'s< ; W:a hA : W'-yM!SM^W \n.-C •' v'?- ifi It^KItltl •81 iU •v«S c P'c< rt-ce: Figj'e 2 ' -t s CK r:-ce: f k9^*e I ‘ = * -i !*#*•*•*•*• «s Lli &>Xs t‘.>'3c?St*iI mf m ipPi MTirml ~ ~mrxm Bl ku'M ' ■ i- ; .??!■'*,:■,■ p*^ is ■ ^i; -i '. ' ■-•■ ..:l .* • '.i; "fJv • ' IIV' ? -t-%- • ■' " <■ V*.: ^ .. j . .• .,-■> /< . * ■^^fc ;v*l2:'<: ■ V ; A'y'?'i -.'. ■ fc ■ . t.^is ■ • -fc,.;!:* '( ipm mmm::- :■ * •v-:s.ss -^f fK’ IM 4'* Janice Gundlach - 3250 Fox Sti From: "R To: "’N <MGAFFRON@ci.O Date: 1/: Subject: 3< Melanie and Mike, The City of Orono s mentioned property MCWD staff review found it acceptable * Rule B; Erosi must be proposed • Rule D: Wetl proposed around tl • Rule N; Stori quality, and best nr Thanks for the opf Renae Clark District Techniciai 18202 Minnetonk Deephavon, MN Ph. 952-471-059I EXHIBIT J CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. R 1 ? A RESOLUTION DETERMINING THAT THE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL BY BRUCE AND iCRlSTINE PADDOCK AND GEORGE STICKNEY HAS NO POTENTIAL FOR SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, AND DENYING THE CITIZEN PETITION FOR PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (EAW) -FILE #03-2964 WHEREAS, the City of Orono (‘‘City*’) is a mur'cipil corporation organized and exi.sting under tlic laws of the State of Mhmesoti; and WHEREAS, the Miru'.csota Envirorunental Quality Board (EQB) has officially notified the City of a petition by a group of citizens represented by Jack Y. Perry of Briggs and Morgan requesting the completion of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the proposed development (“The Development”) by Bruce and Kristine Paddock and George Stickney (ihe “proposers”), City of Orono planning and zoning application File #04-2964; and WHEREAS, under EQB Rules 4410.0500, the City has been designated as the appropriate Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) to determine whether an EAW is required. 1. 2. 0: I .. . FINDINGS OF FACT The City Council finds that the Development does not meet or exceed anv of the thresholds of EQB Rules Part 4410.4300, Subpart 2 through 37, and does not meet or exceed any of the thresholds of EQB Rules Pa:t 4410.4400, Subparts 2 through 24. Therefore, neither aa Environmental Assessment Worksheet nor an Environmental Impact Statement are mandatory for the Development under EQB Rules. The City Council finds that the Development falls within Part 4410.4600 Subpart 2(B) in that all governmental decisloiis have not been made, and falls within Part 4410.4600 Subpart 12 because, while 3 lot development does noi exceed the threshold of 20 dwelling units for a fouxth class city, the Development is within a Snoreland Area as defined in EQB Rules 4410.O2C0. llierefore, the City council fjxther finds that the Devcloment is not specifically exempt fron EQB Rules 4410.0200 to 4410.6500. | ■ » 4 ‘ Page I of 3 -H Uii 1 i I CITY of ORONO 3. 4. 3. 6. 7. 8. 9. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ^ ^ EQB Rules 4410.1100 Subpart 6 provide that the RGU shall order the preparation of an EAW if the evidence presented by the petitioners, proposers and otlier persons or otherwise known to the RGU demonstrates that, because of the nature or location of the proposed project, the project may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The RGU shall deny the petition if the evidence presented fails to demonstrate the project may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The City Council hu: reviewed the evidence presented by the petitioners, proposers and other persons as well as other mfoimation of record pertaining to the development. The Citizen Petition for an EAW has been formally withdrawn by the petitioners and due to the petition beirrg active for one year the City has determined that a decision shall be made regarding whether an EAW shall be required of the applicants. The Citizen’s Petition was reacting to a 6 lot proposal and such proposal has been withdrawn and a 3 lot proposal has been submitted which is looked at favorably by the petitioners. The proposal for a 3 lot subdivision significantly reduces the potential for significant environmental impacts. The environmental issues raised by the petitioners do not pose the potential for significant environmental effects, as discussed in the City Council memorandum dated March 4,2004. The City Council finds that the concerns raised in the Citizen Petition have been and will continually be addressed as the applicants continue through the subdivision process and preliminary and final approval will not be given until all issues are settled throu^ the Planning Commission ard City Council approvals. 'Tlakiiii I ii i«t<au Si h A.CITY of OROXO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI L NO.K ? <S V NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Orono, Miiinesota that the Citizen Petition to the EQB by Jack Y. Peny of Briggs and Morgan, is hereby denied, and notification of such denial shall be forwarded to EQB staff, to the proposer, and to the petitioners’ representative within S days per EQB Rules 4410.1100 Subpart 8. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota this 8*’’ day of March, 2004. ATTuST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor • « n ii .1 1 > : i . it , \ i Pages of 3 1 . . ,1 r. . .. i i I I K ii 2 fl ‘Vr.n.wii feA™Hw?v'<*iv'Si«^ ■ .<tfc^v.^ '-t.:-i.*'-aia^ ifm •Z 'T.'tjf i »•' V kSS1^if., ' .-^.-C.m •:/, :jc ir <' ■ 'f ■ u.''^ L-'.i.'fc* 'i- BP^'- - V-v’"^ ' '.' ^t - '^'JdjKK^nnXrgna r.S.. > V Vm ilittS' _1? - • *•• * 1* ' •i 1% ii« v: » > 0 f , i- if yv, * lA^- ^>-^ <‘ *ii . • .. •; ' ‘'.‘■a’v ;'. .. . ' • • ■ •• if 44$ s£^^‘ •CT4JU?.9u*^ ^ M^.\ * ‘L «^- -1 I** .** «/5 m::it mm. mm ■ V- ^ V ‘ ij /O y • *.. ..* •» ••y -r,' ; • "'^t ' •'^ . • • •■ \ f ’jVi.';.;' i . ■ ■ : i • 1:a a EXHIBIT L t3 ic A MAASS, LLC r<». luix I'l’ t.o.Nc. I AKi:. minni;s<»Ta November 13, 2003 Mike Gaffron Director of Planning and Zoning 2750 Kelley Parkway Ofono. MN 55356 Dear Mr. Gaffron: My *5 David Maass. and my wife and I live at 3175 Fox Street in Orono (Lot 001 Blo-k 00 1 ‘^® directly to our west has S^^slx lote. ^ P^^chased by Bruce and Chris Paddock, and is in the process of being subdivided rf“rrs-n inlnf ^ northwest corner of our property which collects Our second major concern relates to the impact upon our trees The exi«.tmn i., .k developing property very closely parallels our lot line, starting arPox ^r^et a^ feet before veering off to the west. We have^ been informed by Se developer reir LmT'^7 7 Oor lot is heavily wooded, and we have a variety of hardvJSjd trees, some quite large, that are very close to this drivewav We am mnrc>rn^7,Zt . to bo^, '’“'"“'r <=“ »>* »' tees dee 1 i Uii 1 iiiUiiill -2-Notembcr 13,2003 I: w* are aware that the City of Orono and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District impose stringent regulations to protect city land and Lake Minnetonka. We appreciate those efforts but would like to state our personal concerns with ref ard to this particular development. Thank you for your attention to this matter. ’ Sincerely, David A. Maass a ’ 1 . . .t l.J . . ;kull t kill i r K f RUN DATE: ‘*‘ 38 04117:3110011 *“*ROf ADDR 52S SUSSEX CIR “IWHBRHAMB KJFASOLAATOFASOIA fAXTAYER KENNETH! A Tia^l-tYOFASOlA r.4AME/ADDR 535 SUSSEX CIR long LAKE MN 55)56 38 04117231)0011 >|U)rADDR 3125 FOX ST DWNBR NAME B F SULLIVAN A M SULLIVAN TAXPAYER BRIAN F A MARIA SULLIVAN ^ SAME/ADUR ^ LONOLAKEMN 55)56 38 05II7214I002! PROPAODR 380 OXFORD RD OWNER NAME SHELLY SANDUbRO STORCH taxpayer SHEIi-Y SANDBERG STORCH NAME/ADDR HIOHCROF T RO WAY/ATA MN 55191 38 0511723440004 PROPAOOR 3250 fox ST OWNER NAME BRUCE O PADDOCK y^^^^j^YER DRUCEO PADDOCK •* NAME/AODR 3250 FOX ST long LAKE MN 55356 31 0511721440008 PROPAIXIR 3)50 POX ST OWNER NAME MARNA W FULLERTON “'taxpayer MARNA W FUU.TR I ON ® 'NAMB/ADDR J)*® ^ - LONG LAKE MN 55356 WHff HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPI ' INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY O' S LIST PAUL: I 38 0411723320013 PROP ADDR 573 SUSSEX CIR OWNER NAME HANS C KJLUNCJSTAD liT AL TAXPAYER IIANSCAANAKILLINGSTAD NAME/ADDR 575 SUSSEX CIR LONOLAKEMN 55156 )B 0511723410020 PROPAODR 525 LEAF ST OWNER NAME NEW THOUGHT CH Rfcl. SCIENCE taxpayer new THOUGHT CHURCH of NAME/ADDR RELIGIOUS SOENCE 525 LEAF LONOLAKEMN 55)56 IS 0511723410028 PROP ADDR 565 LEAF ST OWNER NAME M R KOSIERADZKIA J M K FOX TAXPAYER M R KOSU.RAOZK1 A J M K FOX NAME/AUUR 565 leaf ST LONGIAKEMN 55T56 38 0511/21440006 PROP ADDR 3295 TOXST OWNER NAME KYU FAMILY ITDPTRNSHP TAXPAYER KYLEFAMILYLTOPTRNSHP NAME/ADDR 1 140 TONKA RD UJNGLAKliMN 55356 18 051172)440009 PROP ADDR 3)10 FOX Sr OWNER NAME PNA(iORSKEALANACORSKE FAMI la a L5/NN A NAGORSKE NAME/ADDR 42)7 PINEVIEW LAN PLYMOiniIMN 55442 38 041172)1)0010 PROPAOOR )l7)FOXS) OWNER NAME D A MAASS * A H MAASS TAXPAYER D/'VID A ANN MAASS NAME/ADOR P O BOX 192 LONGLAKLMN 55)56 38 0511723410026 PROP ADDR 550 OXFORD RD OWNER NAME D 2 KNUDSON A M F KNUDSON TAypAYFR DOUGLAS I KNUDSON LONGUKLMN 55356 38 051172)44000) PROP ADDR ) 300 FOX ST OWNER NAM E W I. TRUEECK A J W TRUBECK TAXPAYER WILLIAM LA JUDITH WTRUlILK NAME/ADDR 3)00 FOX ST LONIiLAKEMN 55)56 )8 051172)440007 PROPAODR 3)45 FOX ST OWNER NAME JOU£Y EULIXRTON WHITE TAXPAYER JOLUY FULLERTON WHITE NAME/ADDR 21 7 CXILDEN GATE AVB BELVEDERE CA 94920 ■ ?3 38 0511723440010 PRC. ADDR 38 ADDRESSUNASSIGNED OWNER NAME JOUEY FULLERTON WHITE ET AL TAXPAYLR JOUEYWIIIIE N/LME/ADDR 212 OOLOEN GATE AVE BELVEDERE CA 94920 1 * - A irumniiiTriRfdli—nw MM RUNDAIVtSaZWI V m* 1.^.. - A 'ii • y#'c?>* 45?t^ IP.' %r‘ H3WEP1N COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYS iT.M PROPERTY OWNERS LIST I CERTIFY THATTHE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACXXIRATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF IM*ORMATION AS IT APPEARSTHIS DATE ONI 10; RECORDS OPTHE HEPWEPIN COUNTY TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPARTM WTVTO THE BEST ^ OFMYKNOWLEDOEANDBEUEF. DATE PAGE: I ' ^) V. • J •i t EXHIBIT N ••y' »■':'.1 ■ !nnepin Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Department ■ \ . • ••• .*. >i- *•; ’' Vv^r*' ni S « / MAX/i/BU, wEsr EC * • ~ -«... ^3 /•/ , fi$tcl^/l,ofpiniatlon '■i:::iPar£i(:4bMl|r23440004 3•,, .g lrno(tit|sg 5; and datiimm C feiiS This fe , / ..Cv, .)/ , m .^250 te/iiS »coinpiiationx}f,in guthorttles and o^qj^c ITT *, J H i -J REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COi iM^ii ^^PPJING MAY 1 0 2004 CITY OF ORONO DATE: May 6,2004 ITEM NO.: 5" Department Approval: ^ ,* Name Michael P. Gafiron Title Planning Director f" Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: 2004 Joint Use Dock License (Renewal); Minnetonka Power Squadron List of Exhibits A - City Map of Joint Dock Locations B • Resolution C - 2004 Application We are in receipt of a renewal joint use dock license application for the Minnetonka Power Squadron. The application exhibits no changes from previous licenses. Within the past year there have been no complaints regarding any of this joint use dock. Staff recommends approval of 2004 joint use dock licenses for Minnetonka Power Squadron. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution granting a joint use dock license for 2004 to Minnetonka Power Squadron. Proposed Motion: Moved by __. seconded by __, to adopt Resolution No., directing staff to issue a joint use dock license to Minnetonka Pow er Squadron for the period January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004. It ■■A-. VICTOKIA ESTATIW J Al iik; isi,ani>, inc.cm’OFonoNo PRIVATIi JOINT USF, DOCK I.OCATIONS RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO ISSUE A JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE TO MINNETONKA POWER SQUADRON SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2004 TO DECEMBER 31, 2004 WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City" is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota and has the authority and responsibility under Minnesota Statutes. State Statute 412, et. seq. and State Statute 462, et. scq., to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City and other members of the public within the City; and WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the primary harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and the Department of Natural Resources of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, .he regulation of the navigable waters involves an exercise of police power of the State, LMCD, and the City of Orono, all of which have a >pted rules to ensure to all equal cnjo>Tnent of the public rights and equal protection from activity on or near the puolic waters and on the land within the City which, if unregulated, may be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare; and WHEREAS, the regulations of the DNR, LMCD, and the City of Orono regulate the property rights of the riparian owners both as to residential owneis and the commercial marina owners to the extent prohibiting any interference with the public waters adjoining their property. The LMCD, DNR and City of Orono must fulfill their trusteeship over the public waters by protecting against interference by anyone, including those who assert the commonlaw rights of riparian owners, whethei or not they be commercial marinas or residential owners; WHEREAS, as to Lake Miiuictonka, a mutual right of enjoyimcnt exists between and is shared by riparian owners and the public generally, no one riparian owner has exclusive privileges over Lake Minnetonka. The only additional private right that any riparian owner may have over the public generally is to construct one dock to the navigable depth of the public waters. There can be no dispute but that the public generally and each npanan ow'ncr to Lake Minnetonka has the right to use the entire surface area of Lake Minnetonka for all suitable purposes in common with all other riparian owners This right is a right not only to members of the public but the right to each riparian owner. This mutual right of cnjo>'ment which is shared by riparian owmers and the public generally includes the recreational benefits of the lake such as boating and fishing therein; the riparian owner has no exclusive privileges to these nghts; and Page 1 of 2 WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial beneficial public use only as long as all riparian users of the lake are regulated in such a way as to ensure there is no abuse of the limited riparian rights; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted reasonable regulations regarding the construction and use of lakeshore and dock facilities when such facilities are used and maintained by three or more families, which regulations include the annual licensing of Joint Use Docks pursuant to Section 94-37 of the Orono Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the above noted general conditions and concerns and the following special conditions as they relate to an application for an annual Joint Use Dock License described on Exhibit A attached. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby directs the Staff to issue a Joint Use Dock License according to tlic facts and conditions noted on Exhibit A attached. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono at their meeting on the 10'” day of May, 2004. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of ., 2004 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minne.sota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of ., 2004 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Miimesota muracipal corporation and said instrament was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of 2 Exhibit A Resolution No. Page 2 Exceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject to revocation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 94-37 of the Orono Municipal Code. m. DOCK LAYOUT The dock structure or layout authorized by this license shall be as shown on attached Exhibits B and C. Any changes in this layout shall be subject to prior review and approval of the City Council. IV. SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinance of the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to full compliance with these conditions. Failure to comply with these conditions is cause for license revocation and/or prosecution by the City. Compliance with conditions of CUP Resolution No. 3416. V. Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the premises in a manner pemiitted by this resolution, but the use of Lake Minnetonka and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations and ordinances as the City and other competent regulatory authorities shall deem necessary from time to time in the public interest. CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 LICENSE YEAR 2004 Crystal Bay, Mn 55325 ^ 952-249-4600 ..wgfUrtl CITY USE ONLY Date Form Mailed to Licensee / PQe Application Returned to Cit>________ Fee F>e Received S By Employee ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE APPLICATION Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 94-37 Section 94-37(a). LICFNSF. RKQlllRED - "It is unlawful for any (group or association of persons or families, more than two in number, whether incorporated or not) to engage or participate in... Joint use (of any lakcshore property) without First ^avin^o^ained_^n_8nnuaMlcense_f^mJhC:Cit^/|:^^^^^_^__^^_^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Please complete all items and submit signed application, required attachments, and license application fee to the City Clerk by March 1 of the license year. I. ASSOCIATION INFORMATION I. Association title or name (if any) Lake (At __________ Bay_________________2. 3.Person responsible for this applicatioiv*^'^’ Name Phone U)o. •7(g ‘3> ♦ ^hMsL S334£» 4. Relationship to association Association is (check applicable items); ___ unincorporated homeowner’s group. X unincorporated club or recrestion group. ___ incorporated Homeow'ner's Association. ___incorporated club or rccreatnn group. 5.Principal purpose of joint use dock is (check applicable items); ____provide boat mooring and lake access for residential property. ____ provide swimming access, beach, or offshore dock. 6. ^ provide a club or association gathering place for activities. Dock is located on (check applicable item); ___one member’s private property. ___property leased by the group/at sociaticn. ___casement or outlot owned in common. property osvned by the group'association. Page I of 4 7. 8. r.ist Dock location and ownership information: Street address SlD P~)i4 Legal property description Kl/y ft^cnvT^ lT)f- PID# 22-\n-2\ 14QDP7__________________ Listed property owner(s) Pf\A)f. f ^^AX/x d ^t)<r \ Names/addresses of abutting lakeshore property owners: fNonh/West^ fSouth/EasO Names/addresses of other affected property owners (attach sheet if necessary): 9.Insurance Coverage - The jointly used dock is insured by one of the following: __property owner ’s homeowner ’s policy. separate group/association owned policy. Name of insured MiNKkgT<gMUA. Powgg SrpviAQgQKA____________ Name of insurance carrier KiOKTU CigiLD t|k.\cq^lgAKlrJ? m. Name of insurance agency IKIC agQQKLW>tO Policy No. Cp _____ Effective date of coverage T* 30»04 Amount of coverage: Public liability, per person, per occurrence $ 1, OOP i OOP Public liability, per occurrence S ij/w^.rvTp Security and policing of the jointly used dock and property is provided by (check applicable items): ____ fencing ____ security lighting property owner ’s presence ____ contract security service ____ other (specify)_________________ II. DOCK INFOILMATION 11. 12. List Dock Use Area Specifications: Width of shoreline; _________ft. Length of main dock from shore: ______ft. ________ft. and _______ ft.Dock setbacks from side property lines at shore; Dock Construction (check applicable items): X seasonal dock (relocated or replaced each year) -------permanent piling with seasonal deck _____permanent piling and decking ____wooden decking _____ metal decking Page 2 of 4 . 13. List Dock Accessori es: Number of fire extinguishers available at the dock K///1 14. 15. Number of life preservers available at the dock V/A List number of slips in each category ("slips" includes boat lifts): Transient (day use only) slips Transient (day use) off-shore buoys ^ Permanent moorage slips 0" Permanent moorage off-shore buoys ^ Dry storage (rack) slips_Maximum number of boats at the dock List number of off-street parking spaces available for users of the joint use dock. Parking, if provided must not be separated from the dock by any public road. -Q- spaces. III. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTRO! 16. Shoreline is protected by (check applicable items): Xl stone rip rap ___wood seawall ____metal seawall ____concrete seawall grass and vegetation only other (specify) 17. Depth of water at shoreline:ft; at 50 ft. out;; at 100 ft. out: REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: A. POCK PLAN - Al.L APPLICATIONS A dock plan, draw n to scale, showing the shoreline width of this property, the side property lines and the location, layout and dimensions of all docks, slips and buoys. If off-strcct parking, dry storage or other on-land functions are intended, these also should be shown on the plan. B. UNINCORPORATED GROUPS OR ASSOCIATIONS 1. A list of the names and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip users. 2. A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Note: This copy u not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement: "This is a renewal appbeatton and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same by-laws or agreement origuially made in (state yeai) and on file with the City." Applicant's initials Page 3 of 4 c.INCORPORATED CLUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS I. A list of the names, mailing addresses and titles of all corporation officets. 2. A statement as to the total number of members in the club or association, members 3.A certified copy of the articles of incorporation and by-laws of the corporation. Note: These copies are not reouaed if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement; "This is a renewal application and our jointuse dock is to be operated under the same articles of incorporation and/or by-laws as originally made or last amended in_______(sute ycir) and on file with the City." yinlL _____Applicant's initials D.ANNUAL LICENSE FEE - ALL APPLICATIONS Joint Use Dock License Application Fee according to the current City Fee Schedule INITIAL APPLICATION FEE (S50.00) RENEWAL JOINT USE FEE. per year PLUS SLIP FEE for each permanent moorage slip, lift, dry stack, or buoy._____slips @ 2.00 each S S 20,00 LATE FEE (S25.00) if application returned after 3/1/04 TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION S s LATE FEE - Renewals Application for renewal of licenses shall be made no later than March 1 of the license year. The City shall not accept renewal license applications received after March 1 unless the application i«^ accompanied bv a late fee of S25.Q0. REVIEW PROCEDURE When a complete application is received, the application will be reviewed by the City Council and, in the case of new or unusual applications, or applications proposing substantial changes from prior licenses, also by the Planning Commission and/or a specially appointed Marina Committee. The Council will take action on the application after complete review. THE SUBJECT DOCK MAY BE INSTALLED AND/OR OPENED FOR USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Sections 94-36 through 94-38 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Joint Use Dock License Application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City’s employees and agents to enter upon the property at any reasonable time to perform safety and code compliance inspections. Date EXHIBIT -..-..tlTTOH • • I 4r ^ Minnetonka Power Squadron 510 Big Island Orono, MN PID# 22-117-23-140002 Lot #5 \ /ieB IS \c« ^ • E:) ^ mi-is^^s's I ecu cT^ r »<rPTING MAY 1 0 2004 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION cn Y OF OHONO Dale: May 7, 2004 Item No.: ^ Department Approval: Name: Michael P. GalTion Title: Planning Ditectot Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: Interim Ordinance - Moratorium - Revised Language List of Exhibits A - Moratorium Ordinance as Adopted 4-12-04 B - Revisions Option I (Revises the Moratorium Area) C - Revisions Option 2 - (Same as Option 1 plus eliminates moratorium on CUP.'VAR approvals) D - Option 2 in Adoption Format The Interim Ordinance adopted Apiil 12 eslablislicd a moratorium area that included areas cf the City having “allowed densities of 2 residential dwelling units per acre or greater". This language inadvertently included all of Orono ’s '/j-acre zoning districts (Navarre area, primarily) which was not intended by slafT. The language prohibits the granting of preliminary subdivision approval, zoning (cup/variance) approval, rezoning, or PUD approval. Exhibit B (Revisions Option I) would change llie above language by redefining the Moratorium Area as all property in Orono "which is currently guided in the Orono 2000- 2020 Community Management Plan to allow residential densities in excess of two dwelling units per acre" except for Stonebay. This language functionally eliminates the R-IB, I.R-IC, and LR-lC-1 !4 acre districts from the moratorium. Exhibit C (Revisions Option 2) goes one step further ’"n refining the impacts of the moratorium, by also changing the language to now allow CUP and variance approvals during the moratorium, while still prohibiting approvals of preliminary subdivisions, rezonings, and PUD'S. This change will allow existing developed properties within the Moratorium area to gain approvals for CUP’s and variances, since it is not the intent of the moratorium to hinder improvements of existing developed properties. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends adoption of Option No. 2 per the ordinance attached as Exhibit D. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the revised language per Option 2 and adopt Ordinance No. 8, 3'** Series, anieiiding Ordinance No. 7, 3''^ Series, the Interim Ordinance adopted April 1 2, 2004. ORDINANCE NO. 7,3RD SERIES INIHRIM ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTION 462.355, SUI3DIVISION 4. TO ESTABLISH A MORATORIUM PROHIBITING THE GRANTING OF PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL. ZONING (CUP/VARIANCE) Al’PROVAL, REZONING. OR PUD APPROVAL WITHIN HIE MORATORIUM AREA AS DEFINED HEREIN. 1 HE CITY OF ORONO ORDAINS: The Municipal Code of ihc City of Orono is amended by adding Ordinance No. 7, 3rd Series. SECTION 1. SM«ncnL.oX.JiQlici[, The City Council finds that the City i.s presently faced with the potential of applications for .subdivision, re/oning, zoning (CUP/Variance), or PUD approvals for property within the Moratorium Area as defined in .Section 2. It appears to the Council that the consequences of allowing such applications to be appiovcd may be uiulcsirable because the cuneni ordinances may not be consistent with the City’s zoning and development goals. I he Council, Iheicfoie, finds th.it it is necessaiy to study the impact of development under current oidinanccs to dctemiine whether they lullill the underlying purjmses of the City's land use and zoning provisions. I he Council further Inuls th.it if, as a result of this study, the land use controls and zoning provisions contained in the City code need to be revised, such revision is a process th.u cannot be accomplished until a .study has been completed and a hearing held. Du^i g tlu.s period, it ts desit.iblc that the Council establish guidelines for the benefit of those who wish to develop property tn order to bring about savings of public and private expciuhtures and to provide the pubhe guides to future City action. Since enactment of an amendment to the code would undoubtedly modify c.xistmg reguLitions conceniing permitted laiul use .iiul zoning perloiinancc standards, the granting of preliminary ’ approval of subdivision applications, zoning (CUlWariance) applications, rezoning applications, or PUD for pioperty within; tlie Mor.itornim Area would be contrary to the punmsc of the zoning enabling act, Minne.sota .Statutes Section 462.351. et seq. The Council further finds that it would be unwise, improper and uii|ust to .allow individual development to occur during this study. SECTION 2. MorsltorhilU.Ar-€4 As used in the Ordinance. Moraturiuni Aiea sliall lie defined as all real property within the City of Orono which has allowed densities of two residential dwelling units per acre or gie.itcr, with the exception of the property within the plat of StoneBay. 12109JI4A1 rM.'4« SECTION 3. Study. The City Council requires its staff to initiate a study regarding the impact of development within the Moratorium Area under current ordinances to determine whether they fulfill the underlying purposes of the City’s land use and zoning provisions, and regarding the implications of the potential need for amendments to the City code to implement the results of that study. SECITON 4. Restrictions on the Granting of Preliminary Subdivision Approval, Zoning fCUPA^ariance) Approval. Rezoning, or PUD approvals No preliminary subdivision approval, Zoning (CUPA^ariance) approval. Rezoning, or PUD approval, shall be given by the Council for any pioperty within the Moratorium Area. SECTION 5. Duration. This Ordinance shall expire within six months of the passage of this Ordinance by the City Council, without Council action, or it may be repealed earlier if the Council deteniiines that the requisite studies have been completed and adopted and that appropriate evaluation and action, including any necessary revisions of the zoning code, have been finalized. The duration of this Ordinance may be extended by adoption of a subsequent Ordinance for a total of not to exceed the statutory limits in Minn. Stat. 462.355, .subdivision 4. SECTION 6. Variances. 'I'hc Council may grant a variance to this Ordinance if the Council finds after careful review of all the facts that a proposal is not contrary to the intent of the Comprehensive Community Management Plan, that it is compatible with the zoning and official control amendments being considered by the City, that it does not adversely impact the health, safety or welfare of the citizens and that it otherwise meets the requirements of the Oroiio City Code and state law. SEC TION 7. Separability. Every section, provision, or part of this Ordinance is declared separable from every other section, provision or part; and if any section, provision, or part thereof or action taken hereunder shall be held invalid, it shall nut affect any other section, provision, or part. SECTION 8. Publication. This Ordinance shall be published in THE PIONEER and THE LAKER and shall be effective immediately. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this IZ'** day of April, 2004, by a vole of 4 ayes and 0 nays. AlTi:ST: y nda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara Peterson, Mayor 8 Rev. 4-14-04 MPG/^4a Proposed Revs. ORDINANCE # ___, 3RD SERIES INTERIM ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTION 462.355, SUBDIVISION 4, TO ESTABLISH A MORATORRB4 PROHIBITING THE GRANTING OF PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL. ZONING (CUPA^ARIANCE) APPROVAL, REZONING, OR PUD APPROVAL WITHIN THE MORATORIUM AREA AS DEFINED HEREIN. THE CITY OF ORONO ORDAINS: The Municipal Code of the City of Orono is amended by adding Ordinance No.__, 3rd Scries. SECTION 1. Statement of Policy. The City Council finds that the City is presently faced with the potential of applications for subdivision, rezoning, zoning (CUPA^ariance), or PUD approvals for property within the Moratorium Area as defined in Section 2. It appears to the Council that the consequences of allowing such applications to be approved may be undesirable because the current ordinances may not be consistent with the City's zoning and development goals. The Council, therefore, finds that it is necessary to study the impact of development under current ordinances to detcnninc whether they fulfill the underlying purposes of the City ’s land use and zoning provisions. The Council further finds that if, as a result of this study, the land use controls and zoning provisions contained in the City code need to be revised, such revision is a process that cannot be accomplished until a study has been completed and a hearing held. During this period, it is desirable that the Council establish guidelines for the benefit of those who wish to develop property in order to bnng about savings of public and private c.xpcnditures and to provide the public guides to future City action Since enactment of an amendment to the code would undoubtedly modify existing regulations concerning pemiitted land use and zoning perfonnance standards, the granting of preliminary approval of subdivision applications, zoning (CUP/Variance) applications, rezoning applications, or PUD for property within; the Moratorium Area would be contrary to the puipose of the zoning enabling act, Miiuiesota Statutes Section 462.351, et seq. The Council further finds that it would be unwise, improper and unjust to allow individual development to occur during this study. SECTION 2. Moratorium Area. As used in the Ordinance, Moratorium Area shall be defined as all real property within the City of Orono which has-aHewed-^leBSrties of-two-residential dwelling units per acre or greater is cur rently guided in the Orono 2000-2020 Community Management Plan to allow residential densities in excess of two dwelling un its per acre, with the exception of the property within the plat of StoncBay. 121002142V1 7M748 I SECTION 3. Study. The City Council requires its staff to initiate a study regarding the impact of development within the Moratorium Area under current ordinances to determine whether they fulfill the underlying purposes of the City ’s land use and zoning provisions, and regarding the implications of the potential need for amendments to the City code to implement the results of that study. SECTION 4. Restrictions on the Granting of Preliminary Subdivision Approval. Zoning fCUPA^ariancel Approval. Rezonine. or PUD approvals No preliminary subdivision approval, Zoning (CUP/Variance) approval. Rezoning, or PUD approval, shall be given by the Council for any property within the Moratorium Area. SECTION 5. Duration. This Ordinance shall expire within six months of the passage of this Ordinance by the City Council, without Council action, or it may be repealed earlier if the Council determines that the requisite studies have been completed and adopted and that appropriate evaluation and action, including any necessary revisions of the zoning code, have been finalized. The duration of this Ordinance may be extended by adoption of a subsequent Ordinance for a total of not to exceed the statutory limits in Minn. Stat. 462.355, subdivision 4. SECTION 6. Variances. The Council may grant a variance to this Ordinance if the Council finds after careful review of all the facts that a proposal is not contrary to the intent of the Comprehensive Community Management Plan, that it is compatible with the zoning and official control amendments being considered by the City, that it does not adversely impact the health, safety or welfare of the citizens and that it otherwise meets the requirements of the Orono City Code and state law. SECTION 7. Separability. Every section, provision, or part of this Ordinance is declared separable from every other section, provision or part; and if any section, provision, or part thereof or action taken hereunder shall be held invalid, it shall not affect any other section, provision, or part. SECTION 8. Publication. This Ordinance shall be published in THE PIONEER and THE LAKER and shall be effective immediately. i2iosau2vi mf40 ‘ 1 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 2004, by a vote of__ayes and ____ nays. day of April, ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara Peterson, Mayor 12l082142v1 786746 Rev, 4-14-04 MPG^4b Proposed Revs. ORDINANCE U ___, 3RD SERIES rNTRRIM ORDINANCE PURSUANT 10 MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTION 462.355, SUBDIVISION 4, TO ESTABLISH A MORATORIUM PROHIBITING THE GRANTING OF PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL, ZONING (€y|WARiANOE>-ARPROVAL. REZONING, OR PUD APPROVAL WITHIN THE MORATORIUM AREA AS DEFINED HEREIN. THE CITY OF ORONO ORDALNS; The Municipal Code of the City of Orono is amended by adding Ordinance No.__, 3rd Scries. SECTION 1. Statement of Policy. The City Council finds that the City is presently faced with the potential of applications for subdivision, rezoning, zoning (CUP/Variattco), or PUD approva's for property within the Moratorium Area as defined in Section 2. It appears to the Council that the consequences of allowing such applications to be approved may be undesirable because the current ordinances may not be consistent with the City's zoning and development goals. The Council, therefore, finds that it is necessary to study the impact of development under current ordinances to determine whether they fulfill the underlying purposes of the Citys land use and zoning provisions. The Council further finds that if, as a result of this study, the land use controls and zoning provisions contained in the City code need to be revised, such revision is a process that cannot be accomplished until a study has been completed and a hearing held. During this period, it is desirable that the Council establish guidelines for the benefit of those who wish to develop property in order to bring about savings of public and private c.xpcnditures and to provide the public guides to future City action. Since enactment of an amendment to the code would undoubtedly modify c.xisting regulations concerning pemiitted land use and zoning perlonnance standards, the granting of preliminary approval of subdivision applications, zoniHg-(CLT**VariaiKe>-apphcat»ons-, rezomng applications, or PUD for property within; the Moratorium Area would be contrary to the purpose of the zoning enabling act, Minnesota Statutes Section 462.351, et seq. I he Council further finds th,at it would be unwise, improper and unjust to allow individual development to occur during this study. SECTION 2. Moratorium Area. As used in the Ordinance, Moratorium Area shall he dc filled as all real property within the City of Orono w hich lw»s-aIlow«Hl-d<fHM4H»s of-two -residential -dwelling-nnits-pief acre-of-greater is currently r.uitlcd in the Orono 2000-202 0 Community Miinauement Plan to allow residential densities in excess of two dwelling units per acre, with the exception of the property within the plat of StoneUay. 12109214^(1 M74S SECTION 3. Study. The City Council requires its staff to initiate a study regarding the impact of development within the Moratorium Area under current ordinances to determine whether they fulfill the underlying purposes of the City's land use and zoning provisions, and regarding the implications of the potential need for amendments to the City code to implement the results of that study. SECTION 4. Restrictions on the Granting of Preliminary Subdivision Approval. Zoning (CUP/Variano«> -Appreval. Rezonine. or PUD approvals No preliminary subdivision approval, Zoning (CUPA^orkmoo)-approval, Rezoning, or PUD approval, shall be given by the Council for any property within the Moratorium Area. SECTION 5. Duration. This Ordinance shall expire within six months of the passage of this Ordinance by the City Council, without Council action, or it may be repealed earlier if the Council determines that the requisite studies have been completed and adopted and that appropriate evaluation and action, including any necessary revisions of the zoning code, have been finalized. The duration of this Ordinance may be extended by adoption of a subsequent Ordinance for a total of not to exceed the statutory limits in Minn. Stat. 462.3SS, subdivision 4. SECTION 6. Variances. The Council may grant a variance to this Ordinance if the Council finds after careful review of all the facts that a proposal is not contrary to the intent of the Comprehensive Community Management Plan, that it is compatible with the zoning and official control amendments being considered by the City, that it does not adversely impact the health, safety or we’lare of the citizens and that it otherwise meets the requirements of the Orono City Code and state law. SECTION 7. Separability. Every section, provision, or part of this Ordinance is declared separable from every other section, provision or part; and if any section, provision, or part thereof or action taken hereunder shall be held invalid, it shall not affect any other section, provision, or part. SECTION 8. Publication. This Ordinance shall be published in THE PIONEER and THE LAKER and shall be effective immediately. i2^o«2i42«i Ttara Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 2004, by a vote of__ayes and ____ nays. day of April, ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara Peterson, Mayor 121092MJM 7WT4a ■D ORDINANCE NO. 8,3RD SERIES AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND ORDINANCE NO. 7, 3RD SERIES, INTERIM ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTION 462.355, SUBDIVISION 4, TO ESTABLISH A MORATORIUM PROHIBITING THE GRANTING OF PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL, ZONING (CUP/VARIANCE) APPROVAL, REZONING, OR PUD APPROVAL WITHIN THE MORATORIU.VI AREA AS DEFINED HEREIN. THE CITY OF ORONO ORDAINS: The Municipal Code of the City of Orono is amended by amending Ordinance No. 7, 3rd Series, as follows: SECTION I. The title of Ordinance No. 7,3'** Series, is amended as follows: “ORDINANCE NO. 7, 3RD SERIES, INTERLM ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTION 462.355, SUBDIVISION 4, TO ESTABLISH A MORATORIUM PROHIBITING THE GRANTING OF PRELIMINARY SU'BDfVISION APPROVAL. ZONING (CUPAfARIANCE) APPROVAL, REZONING. OR PUD APPROVAL WITHIN THE MORATORIUM AREA AS DEFINED HEREIN.” SECTION 2. Section 1 of Ordinance No. 7, 3''* Scries, is amended as follows: “Section 1. Statement of Policy. The City Council finds that the City is presently faced with the potential of applications for subdivision, rezoning, zoning (CUP/Variance), or PUD approvals for property within the Moratorium Area as defined in Section 2. It appears to the Council that the consequences of allowing such applications to be approved may be undesirable because the current ordinances may not be consistent with the City ’s zoning and development goals. The Council, therefore, finds that it is necessary to study the impact of development under current ordinances to detemiinc whether they fulfill the underlying purposes of the City ’s land use and zoning provisions. The Council further finds that if. as a result of this study, the land use controls and zoning provisions contained in the City code need to be revised, such revision is a process that cannot be accomplished until a study has been completed and a hearing held. During this period, it is desirable that the Council establish guidelines for the benefit of those who wish to develop property in order to bring about savings of public and private expenditures and to provide the public guides to future City action. Since enactment of an amendment to the code would undoubtedly modify existing regulations concerning permitted land use and 121O02142V1 78674S zoning perfonnance standards, the granting of preliminary approval of subdivision applications, zoning (CUPA^ariance) applications, rezoning applications, or PUD for property within; the Moratorium Area would be contrary to the purpose of the zoning enabling act, Minnesota Statutes Section 462.351, et seq. The Council further finds that it would be unwise, improper and unjust to allow individual development to occur during this study.” SECTION 3. Section 2 of Ordinance No. 7,3^** Series, is amended as follows: “Section 2. Moratorium Area. As used in the Ordinance, Moratorium Area shall be defined as all real property within the City of Orono which has allow ed denaitieo of -two residwrtial-dwelling units per acre or g reater is currently guided in the Orono 2000-2020 Community Management Plan to allow residential densities in excess of two dwelling units per acre, with the exception of the property within the plat of StoneBay.” SECTION 4. Section 4 of Ordinance No. 7, 3^** Series, is amended as follows; “Restrictions on the Grantine of Preliminary Subdivision Approval. Zonine fCUPA^oriono e) Approval. Rezonine. or PUD approvals No preliminary subdivision approval. Zoning (CUP/Voriono e) approval. Rezoning, or PUD approval, shall be given by the Council for any property within the Moratorium Area.” SECTION 5. Publication. Tliis Ordinance shall be published in THE PIONEER and THE LAJCER and shall be effective immediately. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this lO'** day of May, 2004, by a vote of ___ayes and__nays. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor 121092142V1 7SB748 >mcctinG MAY 1 0 2004 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: May 10,2004 ITEM NO.: 7 Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Public Services Director’s ReportmItem Description: Request for Payment Number 1 Homestead Road Sanitary Sewer Project We have reviewed the information submitted by the City's engineering firm and recommend approval of this Request for Payment. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Request for Payment Number 1, North Brown Road (Homestead) Sanitary Sewer Project to Red Pederson Utilities Inc. in the amount of $31,744.87 & 04 2004 7:88 BOMESTROO ROSENE RNDERLIK 6516361311 l/MBonestfoo £SRosene v8AndErflk& |\|| Assodites bifliMfi i AirNlMti Ownr. CWv of Ofpno. t>.Q. Box 66. Orono. MIM 5S323-CX)66 ForParkxi: 3^83/2004 to S/3/2004___________________ Dale: Request No: Conlraotor: Red Pedetaon UtBiWes. Ino.. 100 Interlaohen Rosd. Hopkins. MN 66343 CONTRACTOR'S REQUEST FOR PAYMENT HOMESTEAD ROAD SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS BRA FILE NO. 139-03-141 SUMMARY 1 2 3 4 9 6 7 5 B 10 11 12 OrlQlnal Contract Amount Change Order • Adomon Change Order- Deduction Revised Contract Amount Value Completad to Date MaterWon Hand Amount Earned Leaa Ratalnage 6% Subtotal Leaa Amount PaW Pravloualy Liquidated damages - AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. i $ 0.00 0.00 $ $. $ Recommended tor Approval by: SONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERUK A ASSOCIATES. INC. Approved by Coni HED PEDERSON UTILITIES INC Approved by Owner; CITY or ORONO Specified Contract Compledon Dele: ________________July 31.2004 Data: r»l;i I P- 1 May 3. 2004 1 34S14^ 34S1450 33.415.65 0.00 33.415.6S 1,670.76 31.744 67 0.00 0.00 31.744.67 tm eSittiltaei 04 2004 7:58 BONESTROO ROSENE RNDERLIK 6516361311 P*2 Mmii 1 2 3 4 8 6 r 8 8 10 11 12 13 14 PARTI 1-1/2' HOPE, son 11 DIRECTIONAL DRILLED 2* HOPE son 11 DIRECTIONAL ORILLEO 1- 1/4* HOPE, SERVICE PIPE SDR 11 DIRECTIONAL DRILLE M/4 ” OURE STOP AND BOX 2- ISOLATION VALVE CONNECT TO EXSTINQ FORCL MAIN BITUMINOUS TRAIL PATCH T6RMINATK3N FLUSHING CONNECTION FLU8HMG CONNECTION CLEAR AND GRUB SILT FENCE. REGULAR SOOOmO, LAWN TYPE MNDOT SEED MIX SOA VTOOO FIBER BLANKET Total PART 1 • BASE BO: Unit Contract Unit CUianlfty Amovnt QwonIHy Prlc«loDate toOito LF 410 10.45 410 $4,204.80 LF 1400 10.4S 1400 $14,430.00 IF 300 11.43 267 $3,266.15 EA 7 8504)0 6 $7,600.00 EA 1 765.00 1 $766.00 EA . 1 650.00 1 $650.00 «Y SO 10.00 $0.00 EA 1 1175.00 1 $1,175.00 LS 1 576.00 1 $676.00 EA 1 250.00 1 $250.00 LF aoo 2.00 $0.00 SY 500 1.00 $0.00 AC 0.5 soaoo $0.00 SY 300 1.50 10 00 $33,415 05 Total PART 1 - BABE BIO: Total WortcComptatad To Data $33,415.66 $33,415.65 04 2004 7t88 BONESTROO ROSEflE RMOERLIK 6516361311 p. 3 ! % J PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS OWNER CITY OF ORONO BRA FILE NO. 1384»-141 CONTRACTOR RED PEDERSON UTIUTIES INC CHANOEOROeRS Total Changa Ordaro PAYMENT BUMMARY No. From Pawmont Ratalnaoa Complatad I 83.415.05 II oa«3/2004 I (W03W4 3^744.87 1.670.78 Maftsrtal on Hand Total Pavmant to Data $31,744.87 Original Contract $34,014.60 RalainaQa Pav No. 1 1.670.78 Changa Orders Total Amount Earned S33.419.es Revised Contract $34,914.50 iMpsi4ineol.aa nt.’i I • REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: May 10,2004 ITEM NO.: S fjOtiMr'ii «*crPTING MAY 1 0 2004 CITY OF ORONO Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Public Services Director's Report Item Description: Accept Resignation of PauliiK Bouchard from Park Commission Park Commissioner Pauline Bouchard has submitted her resignation from the Park Commission effective after the May Commission meeting as her family will be moving to Colorado. Pauline has been on the Park Commission since March 2000. The staff recommendation is for Council acceptance of the resignation and to authorize initiating a process to fill the vacancy on the Park Commission COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to accept resignation of Pauline Bouchard from the Park Commission. Motion to authorize initiating a process to fill the Park Commission vacancy iL. % ^ si ?! li II 1 I 1860 Shoreline Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 May 5, 2004 KAV 0 ■; CITYOFOflo/Vo Dear Mayor and Council Members: It is with deep sadness that I hereby submit my resignation from the Orono Parks, Trails and Open Spaces Commission. Starting in June. I will be spending a majority of my time in Colorado and will no longer reside in Orono. I have appreciated the opportunity to serve the community and to help shape your decisions regarding Parks’ planning and funding. I trust that the Commission will continue to provide helpful advice to you and encourage you to work more closely with them. I wish you continuing success in pushirig forward the City's outdoor recreation opportunities’ agenda. I am encouraging my neighbor, Steve Charrier to apply to fill the Commission seat being vacating. Mr. Charrier is a young, energetic father of two small boys, both of whom are already enjoying Orono’s parks and playgrounds. I think Mr. Charrier* interests in the outdoors and status as a parent would contribute greatly to the Commission’s discussions and the Council would benefit from his advice. I urge you to consider him seriously when he appears before you. Thank you for allowing me to serve Orono and its residents. Our City is well endowed with features filled with natural beauty, making it a highly desirable community in which to live. I am sorry to have to leave it. Siriberelyf I / x/kaUiu .%ii Pauline M. Bouchard r. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MPFTING MAY 1 0 2004 CITYOKOHONO DATE: May 10. 2004 ITEM NO. Depurtment Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa THIe Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Public Services Director's Reportm Item Description: Navarre Municipal Parking Lot- 2 Hour I.imil The City owns, operates, and maintains the Navarre Municipal Parking Lot to provide public parking to serve the area business establishments, Navarre Playground Park, and Park and Ride parking for commuters. The Park and Ride commuters generally park in the lot. for long periods of time on workdays, and the majority of these people park in the areas of the lot furthest fn>m the business establishments and the Navarre Playground to allow use of the ct)nvenient parking places for short time parking by business and park users. However, recently there has been more long term parking in the parking spots closest to the Navarre Playground which diminishes the use of these parking spots by park visitors. The Orono Parks Commission discu.s.scd this is.suc at their May 3. 2004 meeting and approved a recommendation that the Orono City Council consider the installation “2 Hour Parking ” signs in the Navarre Municipal Parking Lot for the 3 parking spaces on the north side of the lot adjacent to the Lyric Avenue parking lot entrance. Staff Recommendation The staff recomtuendatitm is for approval of the attached resolution designating "2 Hour Parking ” in the Navarre Municipal Parking lx)t for the 3 parking spaces on the north side of the loi adjacent to the Lyric Avenue parking lot entrance. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of resolution to authorize and direct the Orono Public Works Department to install signs indicating "2 Hour Parking ” in the Navarre Municipal Parking 1 ,ot for the 3 parking spaces on the north side of the lot adjacent to the Lyric Avenue parking lot entrance. pi A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE INSTALLATION 2 HOUR PARKING SIGNS NAVERRE MUNICIPAL LOT WHEREAS, the City ol'Orono is a municipal organization under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Uie City owns, operates, and maintains the Navarre Municipal Parking Lot to provide publie parking to serve the area business establishments, Navarre Playground Park, and Park and Ride parking for eommuters. WHEREAS, the Park and Ride commuters generally park in the lot for long periods of time on workdays and the majority of these people park in the areas of the lot furthest from the business establishments and the Navarre Playground to allow use of the convenient parking places for short time parking by business and park users. WHEREAS, recently there has been more long term parking in the parking spots closest to the Navarre Playground which diminishes the use of these parking spots by park visitors. WHEREAS, The Orono Parks Commission discussed this issue at their May 3, 2004 meeting and approved a recommendation that the Orono City Council consider the installation "21 lour Parking” signs in the Navarre Municipal Parking Lot for the 3 parking spaces on the north side of the lot adjacent to the Lyric Avenue parking lot entrance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono City Council does hereby authorize and direct the Orono Public Works Department to install signs indicating "21 lour Parking” in the Navarre Municipal Parking Lot for the 3 parking spaces on the north side of the lot adjacent to the Lyric Avenue parking lot entrance. Approved by the Orono City Council at a regular Council meeting held on May 10, 2004. ATIliST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ■ 5 V \ 200 FM CO* mcpTING REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MAY 1 0 2004 DATE: ITEM NO.: lO Department Approval: Name Gregoiy A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administntor Reviewed: Agenda Section: Public Services Director’s Report Item Description: Big Island Access LanA Watershed District Wetland Buffer Declaration On April 26**, the Council adopted a resolution approving Zoning Application File #04-2997 granting a Variance and Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a 10' wide gravel access lane on a 90’ wide platted Right of Way on Big Island. On April 22"^, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approved a permit for the construction of this Big Island access lane contingent upon the City of Orono approving and recording with Hennepin County a Wetland Buffer Declaration. The declaration requires the City to maintain the buffer area in an unmowed natural state. The buffer location is shown on Attachment A. This Right of Way area has historically remained in a natural unmowed state, and the City has no plans to further develop or increase the maintenance of the vegetation on this site. The staff recommendation is for Council approval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Wetland Buffer Declaration I DECLARATION THIS DECLARATION ("Declaration") is made this lOtli day of May, 2004, by City of Orono, ("Declarant"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of real property within the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, platted and let»ally describeil as; Platted public road rip,ht of way in the Morse Island Park addition named "STREET" located between lots 38 and 39 Morse Island Park addition. (the " I'roperty") and no one other than Declarant, lias any right, title or interest ir the Property; and WHEREAS, the Property constitutes the entirety of the land to which Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Permit # 04-123 applies; and WHEREAS, Declarant desires to subject the Property to certain conditions and restrictions imposed by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District as a condition to issuance of their Permit # 04-123 for the mutual benefit of the owners of the Property. NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant makes this Declaration and herebv declares that this Declaration shall constitute covenants to run with the Property, and further declares that the Property shall be owned, used , occupied, and conveyed subject to the covenants, restrictions, easements, charges and liens set forth in this Declaration, all of which shall be binding on all persoas owning or acquiring any right, title or interest in the Property, and their heirs, successors, personal representatives, and assigns. Page 1 of 4 i 1. Wetland Buffer. TTie wetland buffer, measuring varying feet in width at all points surrounding the wetlands as delineated on the site plan for the Property attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachment A, shall be maintained by Declarant in perpetuity free from mowing or other vegetative disturbance, fertilizer appliu^ion, yard or other waste disposal, the placement of structures or any other alterition that impedes the function of the buffer in protecting the quality o; water in the wet and or buffering flows into the wetland. 2. The recitals set forth above are expressly incorporated herein. TN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned executed this instrument the day and year first set forth. DECLARANT: By: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk by: Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) 88. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____day of _________, 2004, by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minne.sota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of 4 F7 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of j 2004, by Linda S. Vee, Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public This Instrument Was Drafted By: City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay MN 55323 Page 3 of 4 o IS)o IS) ORONO. MINNESOTA BIG ISLAND ACCESS ROAD «riAN9 0fTt WCTiiMO •imin M. p»vi omc« tmawiMi » •1 «k mil ui «M *»m *M1llMtO tSnCAt QH 4* oi ^ h REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION m \ 0 2004 CITY OF ORONO DATE: May 7,2004 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name RonMoorse Title City Administratur Administrator Reviewed: Report Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Item Description: Appointment of Planning Commission Alternates Liz Hawn and Sandra Smith, both of whom recently retired as regular members of the Planning Commission, have indicated they are willing to serve as alternate members of the Commission. The Council can make these appointments at this time. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to appoint Liz Hawn and Sandra Smith as alternate members of the Planning Commission. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION --=T,NG I 0 2004 ^'^''ohoho^o DATE: May 7,2004 ITEM NO: / Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Designation of OfHcial City Representative for Issues Related to the Big Island Vets* Camp I’he State Veterans ’ Affairs Department has recently made a major change in longstanding policy regarding the Big Island Vets’ Camp. It is staffs understanding that the decision has been made that the Camp will no longer be operated in the manner it has operated for tlie past three decades, and that the Camp property is to be sold. Tliis change in policy rai.scs a number of serious concerns, including the on-going maintenance and supervision of the property, and the potential change in use of the property under a new owner. I he City needs to be involved in working with the Veterans ’ Affairs Department, as welt as witli other agencies with whom the City has developed partnership relationships, such as Three Rivers Park District, and I lennepin (^lunty, toward an outcome that can tneet the goals of the Veterans ’ AITairs Department, as well as address the concerns of the City. Gabriel Jabbour has indicated a strung interest in repre.senting the City on this issue. He is very familiar with the history and operation of the Vets’ Camp, and has substantial experience working with both Hennepin County and the Three Rivers Park District on major issues and projects. It is recommended that Gabriel Jabbour be designated as an official representative of the City concerning the Vets’ Camp issues. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to designate (labriel Jabbour as an official representative of the City concerning the Big Island Vets’ Camp issues. r I COi lAir'n REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^ 0 2004 CITY OF ClTONo DATE: May 7« 2004 ITEM NO; / 3 Department Approval: Nimc Ron Moorse Title Cily Administrator Administrator Reviewed: Report Agenda Section: City Administrator's Item Description: Long Lake Fire Department Budget Amendment The 2004 Long Lake Fire Department budget initially reflected the reallocation of $ 15.000 from the Pension Contribution budget item to the Training Pay budget item. Through discussions with the nrefighters, the Fire Advisory Commission determined the $15,000 should be plaeed back into the Pension Contribution budget item rather than the I'raining Pay budget item, fhis budget amendment needs to be approved by the City. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the amendment to the 2004 I.ong Lake Fire Department budget to reallocate $15,000 from the I'raining Pay budget item to the Pension Contribution budget item. wtitaUki IMi| DATE: April 22,2004 ITEM NO: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION f(^0 2004 cn Y Oh OHONO Dcparimcnt Approval: Name Ronald J. Moorsc Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: Us Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Long Term Plan and Policy for Long Lake Fire Department Pension 'Ilic Long Lake Fire Commission has developed a recommendation regarding a plan and policy for on-going adjustments to the pension benefit for the Long Lake Firefighters, nic pension benefit has not been increased for several years. The current benefit level is in the lower portion of the range of pension benefits provided by other area Fire Departments. I'hc recommendation is based on the pension benefit framework described below. Recommendation 'llie recommendation calls for the pension benefit to be increa.sed from $2,282 per year of serv’icc to $2,375 per year of service for 2003. and to be increased by 3% per year going forward. As indicated in the pension benefit framework below, the proposed level of increases does not require any contribution by the Cities. Pension Bene fit Framework The Long Lake Fire Commission has met with the City's Auditor and with Kelly Shaughnessy, repre.senting the Long L.ake Fire Relief As.sociation, to determine the current status of the pension fund, and to discuss the elements of a framework for determining pension benefit increa.ses. These discussions have provided the basis for developing a policy to guide pension benefit increases over the long term. Tlie following is an outline of the key elements of the framework for determining pension benefit increases. 1 . I'hcrc arc five variables in the pension funding equation A. I hc rate of return on the assets in the pension fund (determined by the investment strategy of the Relief Association) n. The level of pension benefit paid to each firefighter at retirement (determined by tlie Cities) C. The amount of 2% State Aid D. The contribution to the pension fund by tlic Cities (determined by the Cities) E. The level at which the pension liabilities arc funded (determined by the Cities ba.scd on generally accepted pension funding principles) I L 2. Tlie Long Lake Auditor has prepared a funding projection for pension benefit increases bused on the following parameters: A. The projections assume a 5% rate of return on the pension assets B. 'ITic projections provide for 100% funding of the pension liabilities C. The projections reflect the recent higher 2% State Aid due to higher insurance premiums, and due to the addition of the northwest comer of Orono to the Long Lake fire service area. They also reflect higher 2% State Aid in 2007, based on adding the Navarre area to the Long Lake fire service area. D. The Auditor has prepared a funding projection that assumes an annual pension benefit incrca.se of 3%. This level of increase is related to the average annual pay increases provided by the Cities to their various employee groups. These pay increases have averaged about 3% for a number of years. B. The funding projection is ba.sed on increasing the pension benefit from the current level of $2,282 per year of service to $2,375 per year of service in 2003, and provides for 3% benefit increases in the following years. 3. Hie funding projection indicates the benefit scenario rcticctcd in points 2D and 2i:i above can Iw accomplished with no eoniribulion needed by the Cities. COUNCIL ACTION KKQULSTED Motion to approve the recommended plan and policy for adjusting the Long Lake Fire Relief As.sociatioii {lension benefit level, which calls for the pension benefit to be increa.sed from $2,282 per year of service to $2,375 per year of .service for 200.3. and to be increased by 3% per year going forward. ► 1 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION t 0 2004 DATE: S/IO/04 ^^°'"Of?o/vo /ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name: Stephany Good Title: Chief of Police ^ Administrator Reviewed: fi Agenda Section: Item Description: Hire Part Time Police Officer DISCUSSION: There are currently two part time police officer positions open in the police department. The police department recently conducted an open hiring process which included advertising, a written test, an interview process, a physical agility test, and a thorough background. The police department made a conditional offer of employment to Anthony (Tony) Jeffrey White, pending his successful completion of psychological and medical testing. Tony has successfully completed all phases of the Orono Police Department hiring process. The OPD recommends hiring Tony as a fully licensed police officer working part time hours. Tony graduated from LeSueur-Hcnderson High School in 1999. He graduated from police skills school at the Alexandria Technical College in July 2003, and received a B.A. in Criminal Justice from St. Mary ’s University in December 2003. Tony completed an internship with the Wright County Sheriff’s Department which included visiting hundreds of businesses to update contact information. He has been described by citizens and supervisors as mature, helpful, and polite, responsible, and honest. Tony enjoys running, lifting weights, fishing, hunting and all sports. He currently resides in Buffalo. COUNCIL Acri ION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the hiring of Anthony Jeffrey White as a licensed police officer to work part time for the Orono Police Department with a starting salary of $14.42, beginning 5/11/04. Motion to pass resolution approving Anthony J. White as police officer in the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. \ A RESOLUTION TO DECLARE THAT THE PART-TIME POSITION HELD BY ANTHONY J. WHITE IS THAT OF A POLICE OFFICER WHEREAS, that Public Employees Retirement Association Police and Fire Fund excludes part-time police officers unless a resolution is adopted by the governing body to authorize eligibility for coverage in the Police and Fire Fund. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota that effective May 11, 2004, the position Anthony J. White holds is that of a police officer as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 353.64, pursuant to which said employee shall become a member of the Public Employees Retirement Association Police and Fire Fund. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held May 10, 2004. ATTEST:Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Linda S. Vee, City Clerk II lirdlliitiifl^ II »*cptING MAY 1 0 2004 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY OF ORONO DATE: May 7,2004 ITEM NO: Dcpartmciit Approval: Name RonMoorse 1’itle City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: (l‘'^Report Agenda Section: City AdminisQ^tor ’s Item Description: Acquisition of Utility Easement by Eminent Domain>Resolution In the 1980’s, the city vacated the former Oak Place public right-of-way. Subsequently, the City discovered this right-of-way was needed to enable access to homes along the roadway. The Council recently approved the acquisition of a roadway easement along this roadway, by eminent domain, to resolve the access problem. In reviewing the resolution in preparation for filing the eminent domain action, the City Engineer suggested the easement should provide for drainage and utilities, as well as a roadway. The attached resolution provides for a drainage and utilities easement. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the attached resolution authorizing the acquisition of a drainage and utilities easement by eminent domain. I I Ml 11 ril m r— n i n i i ■ -■ --nr r RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PERMANENT TAKING OF LAND BY EMINENT DOMAIN FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITIES WHEREAS, the City Council has detennined that it is necessary and in the public interest that the City acquire by eminent domain a permanent drainage and utilities casement for public purposes at the location hcrcinaner specified. WHEREAS, the City Council has ordered preparation of a resolution authorizing the taking of such easement by eminei.' domain, and authorizing the City Attorney to commence condemnation proceedings. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Orono: 1. That it is hereby detennined that the taking of a pennanent drainage and utilities casement for public purposes over the parcel of land set forth in paragraph 4 hereof is neces.sary and in the public interest. 2. That the City shall acquire by eminent domain a pennanent drainage and utilities casement for public purposes over the parcel of land set forth in paragraph 4 hereof, and that the City Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to commence condemnation proceedings, including a motion for “quick-take” transfer of tide and possession in the District Court of Hennepin County and for appointment of Commissioners to determine the damages, if any, sustained by those persons with interests in the property as a result of such taking. 3. That the City Attorney is hereby further authorized to acquire such permanent casement through settlemen.t with those persons with interests in the property, if such permanent easement can be acquired through settlement in conjunction with obtaining the easement provided for in City of Orono, Rc.solution of the City Council No. 5097. 4. That the land referred to above is more particularly described as follows: The Easterly one-half (1/2) of the alley formerly known as Oak Place laying adjacent to the Westerly 30 feet of I ot 1, Block 7, Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin County, Minnesota j Page 1 of 2 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on May 10,2004. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Page 2 of 2 121093172 vl 754868 ft-!. e t A < i( A RRSOl.UTION AUTHORIZING THE PERMANENT TAKINC; OE LAND BY EMINENT DOMAIN FOR DRAINA(;E AND UTIUI lES WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is necessary and in the public interest that the City acquire by eminent domain a pennanent drainage and utilities easement for public purp<^ses at the location hereinafter speeified. WHEREAS, the City Council has ordered preparation of a resolution authorizing the taking of such casement by eminent domain, and authorizing the City Attorney to commence condemnation proceedings. 1HEREKORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Cou . il of Orono: I.That it is hereby determined that the taking of a permanent drainage and utilities casement for public purposes over the parcel of land set forth in paragraph 4 hereof is necessary and in the public interest, in addition to the ingress and egress casement previously authorized and as a part of those eminent domain proceedings. I hat the City shall acquire by eminent domain a permanent drainage and utilities easement for public pur|ioses over the parcel of land set forth in paragraph 4 hereof, and that the C'ity Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to commence condemnation prt)ceedings, includim; a motion for “quick-take ” transfer of title and posse.ssion in the District Court of Hennepin ('ounty and for appointment of (’onunissioners to iletennine the damages, if any, stislained by those persons with interests in the property as a result of such taking. That the City Attorney is hereby further authorized to acquire such pennanent ca.sement through settlement with those persons with interests in the property, if such permanent easement can be acquired through settlement in conjunction with obtaining the easement provided for in Cits of Orono, Kesolution of the City ('ouncil No. 5(W7. 4. That the land referred to above is more particularly described as follows: The Easterly one-half (12) of the alley fonnerly known js Oak IMace laying ad'acent to the Westerly 30 feet of Li , Block 7, .Saga Hill Revised. Hennepin County. Minnesota Page 1 of 2 Ulu«3l7}«l 75IS65 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COr»M^„ may I 0 2004 ^‘Tyoh-oROf^o DATE; May 7,2004 ITEM NO: H Department Approval: Name RonMoorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: Report Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Item Description: Five-Year Police Service Agreement With Spring Park In recent months, the Council authorized staff to negotiate a five-year rolling police service agreement with the City of Spring Park, Staff has worked closely and cooperatively with the Spring Park City Administrator, City Attorney, and Police Commission to develop a five-year agreement within the parameters set by the Council, This agreement has been approved by the City of Spring Park. The agreement now needs to be formally approved by the Council. The five-year rolling agreement is very beneficial to both Cities. The agreement provides stability and continuity of service, and enables long term budget planning. It also provides stability in terms of the police officer staffing level, which is important to the success of the Police Department in recruiting new officers. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the five-year rolling police service agreement with Spring Park for the years 2005-2009. . AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT FOR LAW ENFORCEMEIST THIS AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT made and entered into this day of May, 2004, by and between the CITY OF ORONO, Minnesota and the CITY OF SPRING PARK, Minnesota, is made under and by virtue of Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59. WITNESSETH; WHEREAS, the City of Spring Park is desirous of contracting with the City of Orono for the performance of law enforcement services within the City of Spring Park, and WHEREAS, the City of Orono is agreeable to render law enforcement services on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, and WHEREAS, a contract such as this is authorized under and by virtue of the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Orono agrees that it will provide law enforcement services for the City of Spring Park on the following terms and conditions and the City of Spring Park agrees as follows; 1.Deflnition of terms. For the purpose of this Agreement, the terms in this Agreement shall have the meanings given to them in this section. A."Contract year" means a 12 month period during which law enforcement services are to be rendered or were rendered to the Contract Cities by the City of Orono. The contract year shall commence on January 1 and terminate on the ne.xt December 31. B."Contract Cities" means any city which is a party to this contract or a similar contract which by its terms is interrelated with this contract for the purposes of allocating the total cost for law enforcement services. The Contract Cities are Orono, Long Lake, Minnetonka Beach, and Spring Park. C."City of Orono Police Budget" shall include all preliminary estimated and actual costs of operating the Police Department of the City of Orono for a given contract year, including but not limited to: 1. All insurance costs including Workers Compensation, Liability, and property insurance. 2. All Salaries, benefits, and overtime. Page 1 3. All costs of equipment and apparatus acquisition and maintenance. 4. All non-prosecution consulting fees. 5. Holiday and severance pay. 6. Unemployment benefits paid. 7. Utilities. 8. Telephone Serv ice. 9. Gasoline and oil for police cars. 10 Books and periodicals. 11 . Wearing apparel. 12. Officer equipment. 13. Building operation, maintenance, and repair costs. 14. All other expenses normally and reasonably incidental to the operation of a nine full-time officer, Chief included, police department. 15. Administrative overhead charge of 10% of the City of Orono Base Police Budget to reflect the support provided to the Police Department by the City’s Administrative and Finance Departments. D. “Annual Budget Package” means a five-year budget projection that provides a not-to-exceed cost for each year of the five-year term of the agreement. The Annual Budget Package is updated each year based on updated costs and updated cost allocation formula results. The not-to-exceed costs cannot be increased without the consent of the Contract Cities, except if due to the cost allocation formula. (The Spring Park population and market value information used in the cost allocation formula will be frozen at the levels used for the 2004 cost allocation calculation for the duration of the initial five-year term of this agreement.) Public Image. The designation "Orono-Long Lake-Minnetonka Beach-Spring Park Police Department" shall be affixed to all marked police cars used by the Orono Police Department under the terms of this agreement and the City of Orono shall cause the listing for the Police Department for each Contract City to be inserted in the appropriate k Page 2 3. 4. telephone directories as may be distributed in the contracting cities. If another city contracts with the City of Orono for service, its name may also be added to the above. Level of Services. The quality and level of services rendered to the Contract Cities shall be the same as the services rendered to the City of Orono, except as hereinafter stated. A. C. There shall be one officer assigned to, and stationed in, the City of Spring Park 24 hours per day, seven days per week. The officers assigned to provide such service will be physically within the city limits of Spring Park at all times save for the following: 1.Responding to Necessary Calls which are defined as calls created by immediate necessity for police service, such as responding to a medical emergency, a crime in progress, an officer requiring immediate assistance, etc. These calls are similar to “mutual aid ” calls in which an officer in one police department assists an officer in another police department. Such calls will always be a part of the communications log of the Orono Police Department and the officer responding will have been directed by official communication to respond to the Necessary Call. Scheduled travel to and from the Orono Police Department Offices at the beginning or end of shifts, including the fueling of squad cars or emergency vehicle repairs. 3.Looping through Orono, using the streets that connect Spring Park and Navarre, west of County Road 19, as a part of regular patrol patterns for the City of Spring Park. The loops that are permitted will have been agreed upon in advance by Spring Park. 4.Transporting prisoners or intoxicated persons from Spring Park to the Orono Police Department, Hennepin County Jail, Juvenile Detention Center, Detox Center, or other locations as necessary. B. The City of Orono will schedule those officers requested by the City of Spring Park at all times, except when not possible due to scheduling problems. The City of Orono will provide a monthly tabulation indicating the reasons why officers stationed in Spring Park were called out of the City. Administrative Responsibility. The law enforcement services rendered to the Contract Cities shall be under the sole direction of the City of Orono, subject to the requirements of this contract; the degree of services rendered, the standards of performance, the hiring and discipline of the officers assigned, and other matters relating to regulations and Page 3 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. policies, shall remain in the control of the City of Orono. Any disputes between the parties to this agreement as to the extent of functions and duties to be rendered hereunder, or the level or manner of performance of such service, shall be resolved by the City Administrator of the City of Orono. If a Contract City disagrees with the resolution, the Contract City may appeal within thirty days of receipt of written notice of the resolution, by giving written notice to the City of Orono asking for arbitration, as provided in paragraph 17. The City Administrator of the City of Orono, through the Chief of Police, shall submit to the Contract Cities a monthly report of services rendered to the Contract Cities, as well as suggestions regarding any efforts or initiatives that may be helpful. Joint Advisory Committee. Each Contract City may appoint two volunteer members to a joint advisory committee and the name of such appointees shall be furnished to the City of Orono Administration. The Joint Advisory Committee shall meet not less than on an annual basis, to discuss and make recommendations regarding concerns or problems identified regarding the provision of police service, and to review and provide input regarding the proposed Police Department budget. Any Contract City may request a meeting of the Joint Advisory Committee. Upon such request, Orono will promptly schedule a meeting. Officers, Employees of the City of Orono. Officers assigned to duty in the Contract Cities shall be police officers of the City of Orono. The City of Orono shall assume all obligations with regard to workers compensation, PERA, withholding tax, insurance, etc. arising from the employment of such officers. The Contract Cities shall not be required to furnish any fringe benefits or assume any other liability of employment to any officer assigned to duty within the Contract Cities unless a Contract City employs officers directly, independent of this agreement, to provide special law enforcement services in the Contract City. In such event, all obligations and liabilities with respect to employment of special law enforcement officers shall be the complete responsibility of the Contract City. No such direct employment shall be entered into by the Contract City without first obtaining written approval of the City Administrator of the City of Orono which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Enforcement Policies. Enforcement policies within the City of Orono shall prevail as the enforcement policies within the Contract Cities. The enforcement philosophy and general enforcement polices of the City of Orono shall be provided in wTiting to the Contract Cities upon request. Enforcement of Ordinances of the Contract Cities, 'fhe City of Orono officers assigned to duty within the Contract Cities shall enforce the Ordinances of the Contract Cities, or equivalent state statutes, including without limitation liquor ordinances. All Officers to be Officers of the Contract Cities. The officers assigned duty within the Contract Cities shall be provided authority to enforce the several laws of the Cities by proper action to be taken by the governing councils of the Contract Cities. The Chief of Page 4 Police of the City of Orono shall furnish the names of all Orono police officers to the Clerks of the Contract Cities. 10. Offenses. All offenses shall be charged in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota or the laws of the Federal Government, or in accordance with the ordinances of tlie Contract City in which the offense occurred 11. Communications, Equipment and Supplies. The City of Orono shall furnish communication equipment necessary to perform the services which are to be rendered. The City of Orono shall provide the necessary equipment and vehicles and the Contract Cities shall provide any necessary supplies which must be specifically printed for the Contract Cities. 12. Cooperation and Assistance from the Contract Cities. With respect to the performance of this Agreement, and the services to be rendered under the Agreement, the City of Orono and the Contract Cities shall have full cooperation and assistance from each other ’s officers, agents, and employees. 13. Headquarters. Headquarters for the services rendered to the Contract Cities under the agreement shall be located at offices owned or leased by the City of Orono, and the citizens of the Contract Cities shall notify headquarters, or radio dispatch for services requested either in person or by some other means of communication. Services shall be rendered to the Contract Cities on a 24 hour basis. 14. Cost to the Contract Cities. A. Cost Sharing Formula for the Total Base Cost. For and in consideration of rendition of Law Enforcement services under this agreement, the Contract Cities shall pay a pro-rated share of the total base costs (net of town aid) determined by a two-factor cost-sharing formula for each contract year. The factors of the formula, which shall be weighed equally, shall be defined as follows: Population of Each Contract City: The population of each Contract City computed as of April 1, prior to each contract year from the then most recent Metropolitan Council estimate, except in a census year when therb is a new census figure available by August 1st, then that figure shall be used. Market Value of Each Contract City: The market value of each Contract City is the valuation related to the total real estate taxes due and payable for the year immediately preceding the contract year. The source of the market value data shall be the official figures of the Hennepin County Assessor ’s Department. The City of Spring Park agrees to participate with all Contract Cities that have signed a police service agreement with Orono in a pro rata share of all the Pages c. operating costs of the department's total base cost based upon a nine full-time officer, and four part-time officer department. It is understood that the formula for the allocation and distribution of costs is as set out above. *• The foregoing notwithstanding, the Spring Park population and market value information used in the cost allocation formula will be frozen at the levels used for the 2004 calculation for the duration of the initial five-year term of this agreement. B. Cost Sharing Among The Contract Cities As of January 1, 2004, the Orono Police Department had an authorized staffing level of eighteen full-time officers, including the Police Chief, and four part-time officers. The police costs that are allocated to the Contract Cities are limited to the cost of nine full-time officers, including the Police Chief, and up to four part-time officers. The 2004 cost allocation formula allocates these costs among the Contract Cities as follows; Mirmetonka Beach: Spring Park: Long Lake: Orono: 6.52% 10.57% 12.19% 70.74% In addition. Spring Park and Long Lake have requested additional officers, specifically stationed in their Cities, to provide the level of police service necessary to meet the needs of the Cities. The two cities pay 100% of the costs of the pay and benefits for these officers. Also, over the years, three additional full-time police officers have been added to the Orono Police Department to keep up with increased demand for police services throughout the Police Departmer.t ’s service area. Orono pays 100% of the costs of the pay and benefits for these officers. Cost to Spring Park - Additional Officers. The cost of additional officers above the base contract cost to the City of Spring Park, shall be determined as follows: A salary figure for the prevision of one officer assigiied to and stationed in Spring Park 24 hours per day, seven days per week shall be computed by calculating the average of all patrol officers’ salaries, and multiplying the average salary by four to obtain the salary figure. To this salary figure will be added that percentage of the total overtime budget for all officers calculated by dividing the number of officers assigned to the City of Spring Park by the numbe- of all officers, 88 hours holiday pay at the hourly rate, wearing apparel, hospuaiization, life insurance. Page 6 L Contract City, and the third to be appointed by the two so selected. The name of each arbitrator shall be submitted in writing to the other party. In the event that the two arbitrators do not appoint the third arbitrator within 15 days after receipt of written notice of appointment of either of the first two arbitrators, the Chief Judge of the District Court of Hennepin County shall have jurisdiction to appoint, upon application of either the City of Orono or the appealing Contract City, the third arbitrator to the Board. The third arbitrator selected shall not be a resident of either Contract City, and shall be a city manager or administrator. The arbitrators' expenses and fees, together with tlie other expenses, not including counsel fees, incurred in tlie conduct of the arbitration, shall be divided equally between the parties to the arbitration. Each party to the arbitration will pay its own attorney fees. Arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the Uniform Arbitration Act, Chapter 572 of the Minnesota Statutes, and any decision shall be rendered within 60 days of appointment of the third arbitrator. Said arbitration shall be binding on both parties. 18. Annual Audit of Actual Costs. The Contract Cities understand and agree that it is impossible to project with complete accuracy the actual costs for labor and equipment as well as the service to be required by each Contract City for the forthcoming contract year, and therefore, agree to a yearly audit to adjust the prior year's estimated contract charge as set forth above to the actual contract charge based upon the actual costs for that contract year. The most obvious example is a natural disaster or other major catastrophic event that requires police service in Spring Park at a level well beyond the normal level, and results in police costs well beyond the level reflected in the budget package. On or about April 1 of each year, the City of Orono will tabulate the actual cost of providing law enforcement services for the prior contract year and will submit to the Contract Cities a summary of said costs. The actual costs set forth for the prior contract year may result in either a credit or a debit applied to the estimated police service costs charged to the Contract Cities. The determination of a credit is ba.sed on the final actual police expenditures and final actual police revenues. The credit is calculated by pro rating the amount of the budget surplus according to the cost allocation formula. If the Contract Cities are still participating in this agreement, and if a credit is due, the credit shall be applied in the third and fourth quarters, on a pro-rated basis, in each month of the third and fourth quarters, from the estimated police service cost payments required of the Contract Cities for the current year of service; and if a debit, the Contract City shall pay the additional sum to the City of Orono together with the estimated contract charge for the current year by applying the debit in the third and fourth quarters, on a pro-rated basis, to the monthly payments in both the third and fourth quarters. The allocation of the credit or debit shall be made pursuant to the same formula set forth above. If the a Contract City is not still participating in this agreement at the time the credit or debit amount is determined as set forth above, the Contract City shall receive from (in the case of a credit) or shall make to (in the case of a debit) the City of Orono a cash payment Page 8 19. 20. 21. in the amount of such credit or debit, one-half on the date that the September estimated police service cost payment would be due if this agreement was still in force and one-half on the date that the December estimated police service cost payment would be due if this agreement was still in force. Unforccasted Expenditures. Not withstanding any of the above, the Contract Cities shall have the right to approve any proposed capital expenditures and/or increase in number of officers not otherwise included in the armual budget. Notice of such proposed and non-budgeted capital expenditures and/or increase in the number of officers shall be given in writing to the Contract Cities prior to actual expenditure for such items and the Contract Cities shall thereafter have ur.til the later of their next Council meeting or 30 days after receipt of said written notice in which to approve and/or disapprove the same in writing or else it is agreed that such proposed expenditures may be made and the cost thereof shall be included in that year’s budget. In the event tlie Contract Cities shall disapprove such non-budgeted capital expenditure and/or increase in the number of officers, it shall not be liable to the City of Orono for any costs incurred by the City of Orono should the non-budgeted capital expenditure and/or increase in number of officers be made despite such disapproval. Furthermore, the cost of such disapproved capital expenditures and/or increase in number of officers shall not be computed in determining the "Base Cost" herein above set forth for each Contract City for the years in which the disapproved expenditure(s) is/are made. Proceeds from Forfeitures Handled by the Spring Park City Attorney. If a vehicle or other property is forfeited through a police action in the City of Spring Park, and the type of forfeiture requires the Spring Park City Attorney to handle the legal work involved in folio..ing through on the forfeiture; the City of Spring Park shall retain the portion of the proceeds from the disposal of the forfeited vehicle or property as prescribed by law, for use subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 169A.63,609.5311, or other applicable law. Hold Harmless and Indemnification. As part of the Police Budget for each contract year, the City of Orono shall purchase liability insurance to insure the City of Orono against liability incurred in the rendering of law enforcement services to the City of Spring Park. The City of Orono shall maintain insurance covering its law enforcement services with limits of not less than $1,000,000 for general liability coverage and $2 million for excess liability coverage. The City of Spring Park shall maintain equivalent insurance coverage. Each policy procured by the City of Orono shall name the City of Spring Park as an additional covered party for claims arising out of or related to the provision of law enforcement services. Except to the extent the same arc the result of the negligent or wrongful intentional acts of the City of Spring Park, the City of Orono agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Spring Park from claims, suits, damages, losses, liabilities and costs however denominated arising out of or related to the provision of law Page 9 L 22. enforcement services by the City of Orono, its officers, agents, employees and contractors. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as any waiver by cither City of any statutory or common law immunities, defenses, or limits on liability. In no event shall this agreement be construed to fix upon the City of Orono any responsibility or liability to Spring Park which is greater or different in kind than the responsibilities and liabilities borne by Spring Park if it was providing law enforcement services through its own police .lepartment. It shall not be a violation of this agreement if the City of Orono, in the exercise of reasonable judgment, is unable to respond promptly or to respond with only limited officers and equipment, or is delayed in responding to a call. Prior Contract. Notwithstanding any language herein to the contrary, or in prior contracts between the parlies, any credit or debit due to the Contract Cities or to the City of Orono on account of prior agreements and contracts for law enforcement between the parties shall be payable in 2005 as provided herein for credit or debit payments payable in 2005 and thereafter. 23. Police Contract Service Explanation. The City of Orono will deliver 24 hour patrol and response throughout Orono, Minnetonka Beach, Spring Park and Long Lake; will conduct routine patrol throughout the cities as needed, will conduct periodic security checks of businesses, and will conduct such duties as requested by the Contract City's councils. The City of Orono will submit regular reports to the Contract City officials and appear at council meetings or any other special meetings as required by the council. This can be the Chief or any other member of the department as required by the council. One officer assigned to and stationed in Spring Park 24 hours per day, seven days per week, as set out in section 3A above, was requested by Spring Park and will be assigned to Spring Park by mutual agreement between the City of Orono Police Department and the Spring Park City Council. 24. Duration of Contract. 1 he initial term of this agreement is five years. In each year of this agreement that the Annual Budget Package is ratified by November 1 by the City of Spring Park, this Agreement will be renewed for a total term of five years beginning with the contract year following the year in which the Annual Budget Package is ratified, fhe elements of the Annual Budget Package so ratified will replace the elements of the previously ratified Annual Budget Package In the event that, in any contract year, the Annual Budget Package is not ratified by the City of Spring Park by November 1, then the amount previously ratified for the next year ’s budget, as part of the most recently ratified Armual Page 10 j Budget Package, shall become the Annual Operating Budget for that year, the term of this agreement will not be renewed, and the agreement will continue in force for the balance of the most recently ratified five-year term. If, in each of the five /cars of any five year term, the Annual Budget Package is not ratified by November 1, the agreement will terminate at the end of the most recently ratified five-year term. 25. Termination of Contract This Agreement may be terminated by the metho^. detailed in section 24, by mutual agreement of all Contract Cities, or for cause. In addition, if any one of the Contract Cities terminates their police services agreement with Orono, the City of Spring Park may renegotiate or terminate this Agreement, unless the cost to the City of Spring Park remains within the approved budget package amounts. In the event that the City of Spring Park terminates this agreement, the City of Spring Park agrees to pay to the City of Orono any of the reasonable extraordinary costs i curred by or within the Police Department of the City of Orono on account of such termination unless the termination is for cause. Tlie extraordinary costs include but are not limited to unemployment benefits paid because of the need to lay off existing police department personnel and severance pay as required by union contract. Termination for cause is defined as a material breach of the contract directly related to the provision of police services. The Contract City will provide a written notice of the alleged material breach to the Orono City Administrator identifying the specific breach, and providing a reasonable time for the City to cure the breach. If the breach is not cured in a timely manner, the termination process will proceed. The determination of whether the reason for the termination is a material breaeh will be made upon mutual agreement by the parties to this agreement. If the parties are unable to reach agreement, the matter will be submitted to arbitration in the manner provided by- paragraph 17 of this agreement. No termination costs shall be imposed unless and until authorized representatives of the parties hereto have met and such termination costs have been mutually agreed upon. In the event the parties are unable to reach agreement, the maiter shall be submitted to arbitration as provided in paragraph 17 of this agreement. Termination of this contract by either party shall not affect the obligation of either party to perform the contract prior to the time that such termination becomes effective. 26. No Discrimination. The City of Orono agrees that during the period of this contract, it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, sex, national origin, or ancestry and will include a similar provision in all subcontracts entered into for the performance hereof. This paragraph is inserted in the contract to comply with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 181.59. Page 1 1 CITY OF ORONO CONTRACTING CITY City Administrator Clerk City of Spring Park Mayor Mayor The above agreement was reviewed and approved by the City Council of the City of __________ by Resolution No._______dated_________________—> 20----. The above agreement was reviewed and approved by the City Council of the City of _________________by Resolution No._________dated___________________20—. 1 Page 12 r.r.»rtog| 2005-2009 BUDGET PACKAGE TOTAL AMOUNT ORONO AMOUNT LONG LAKE AMOUNT MTKA BEACH AMOUNT SPRING PARK AMOUNT 200S Annual Contract Cost S2,220^66 200S City Cost Share Using 2005 Cost Allocation Numbers SUSS,504 $332,067 $98,175 $434,520 2006* Projected Cost $2,352349 Two Year City Cost Share using ‘04 Cost Allocation Numbers $1,423,279 $348,671 $103,084 $450,815 2006-Projected Cost Three Year Contract $2,436,505 Three Year City Cost Share using •04 Cost Allocation Numbers $1,494,443 $366,104 $108330 $467,720 2007-Projected Cost Four Year Contract $2,552,483 Four Year City Cost Share Using *04 Cost Allocation Numbers 2008-Projccted Cost Five Year Contract $U69.16S $2,674,040 Five Year City Cost Share Using ‘04 Cost Allocation Numbers $1,647,623 $384,409 $403,629 $113,649 $485360 S119J31 $503,457 Page 13 L.^iiMwLa. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION »j<cptinG MAY 1 0 2004 DATE: May OHONQ ITEM NO: /g Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:m Report Agenda Section: City Administrator's Item Description: Commission Recognition of Sandra Smith's Dedicated Service on the Planning A resolution recognizing Sandra Smith for her dedicated service on the Planning Commission is attached for Council action. Sandra is not able io attend a Council meeting, due to a conflict with her professional schedule. It is recommended the resolution be adopted and forwarded to Sandra with a letter of appreciation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the attached resolution of appreciation recognizing Sandra Smith ’s dedicated service on the Planning Commission. ¥ A RESOl.UTION OF APPRECIATION TO SANDRA SMITH FOR DEDICATED SERVICE ro THE ( ITY OF ORONO RESOl.UTION NO. WHEREAS, Sandra Smith has scr\ cd this community with distinction during her eleven years as a member of the Pl uming Commission; and WHEREAS, she provided outstanding leadership to the Commission as Chair from February 9, 1998 to April 1, 1999. and again from May 28. 2002 to March 3 1, 2004; and WHEREAS, her years of service have been marked by exemplary dedication to the best interests of the community; and WHEREAS, she has earned the admiration and high regard of those with whom she has worked; and WHEREAS, the perfomiancc of her duties and responsibilities as a member of the Planning Commission has been cbaratteri/cd by excellent and constructive contributions to the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED HI A I' the City Council of the City of Orono tlocs hereby express its sincere appreciation and thanks to Sandra Smith for her distinguished service to the community and does also highly commend her for the manner in which she has carried out her duties and rcsponsibilii.es. BE I T FliR I'IIER RESOLVED, that the City Council extends to her best wishes for eonlimied success in her fiilnre endeavors. Adopietl by the City Council of Orono, Mimiesota at a regular meeting held this loth day of May, 2004. A'lTFST: Linda S. Vec, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson. Mayor —.aifcM J McpjifgQ MAY 1 0 2004 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY OF ORONO DATE: May 7,2004 Department Approval: Name RonMoorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: ITEM NO: / ^ Agenda Section: Item Description: Recognition of Elizabeth Hawn’s Dedicated Service on the Planning Commission A resolution recognizing Liz Hawn for her dedicated service on the Planning Commission is attached for Council action. Liz is not able to attend the Council meeting. It is recommended the resolution be adopted and forwarded to Liz with a letter of appreciation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the attached resolution of appreciation recognizing Liz Hawn’s dedicated service on the Planning Commission. Miiit ..... A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO ELIZABETH HAWN FOR DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, Elizabeth Hawn has served this community with distinction during her nine years as a member of the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, she provided outstanding leadership to the Commission as Chair from April I, 1999 to May 28, 2002; and WHEREAS, her years of ser\'ice have been marked by exemplary dedication to the best interests of the community; and WHEREAS, she has earned the admiration and high regard of those vvith whom she has worked; and WHEREAS, the performance of her duties and responsibilities as a member of the Planning Commission has been characterized by excellent and constructive contributions to the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Orono docs hereby express its sincere appreciation and thanks to Elizabeth I lawn for her distinguished service to the community and docs also highly commend her for the manner in which she has carried out her duties and responsibilities. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council extends to her best wishes for continued success in her future endeavors. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 10th day of May, 2004. ATTEST: Linda 5. Vcc, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor y\ jk r REQUKST FOR COUNCIL ACTION rnuM-^ii McrjifgQ MAY 1 0 2004 CITY OF ORONO DATE: May 6, 2004 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Lin Vee Tllle City Clerk Administrator Reviewed: ^ Name Ronald J. Moutsc ^ Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval / RESIDENTIAL KENNEL LICENSE 1. Tim Lembke 4445 Forest Lake Landing 2. Jim & Jennifer Mutasovsky 1290 I .oma Linda Lane Agenda Section: Licenses 3. Robert Sanscverc 745 Orchard Pari' Road SPECIAL EVENT 1. Applicant: Lvent: Location; Dale: Time: 2. Applicant: nvent: Location: Date: rime: Dennis Nelson Bass Fishing Tournament Way/ala Marine - Maxwell Bay. June 16, July 7, July 14, August 4, August 11, September 8, and September 1 5, 2004 3:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m., Wednesdays Lundgren Brothers 2004 Luxury Home Tour 210 North Shore Drive West June 11-13, 18-20, and 25-27, 2004 1:00 p.m. 7:00 p.m., Fridays Noon - 6:00 p.m., Saturdays and Sundays COUNCIL ACTION REQUES FED: Motion to approvc/deny the above listed licenses. I# KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January 1, 200_to December 31. 200__ Owner:Lt M3 Property Address: /y/9 7^0 ^ /) (include city and zip) /l'^ ^ C» Mailing Address (if different):____________________________________________ Phone: (home) ^6'^^ H'J'Z (work) ^ ^ VS 'J *? 0 RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Fee: $25.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time: (over 6 oooibs of age) Principal Breed; C/eT/C Purpose for more than 2 dogs: /) L'Ac ^ (r/^ ^_______ Dogs normally kept: ^ inside ^ kennel structure c^t^tcpi: 3 i COMMERCIAL Kennel License Fee; $150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business: Business Activities: (example: boarding, breediag, veterinary' care, teuil. eu.) Normal Business Hours; After Hours Contact: (name) (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside boUi The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orooo City Council for a Kennel License as speciHed on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate ary provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigned hereby grams the City permission to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. '72,- Applicant Date For dry Use Only Kennel inspected by Recommends; Approval Da,, KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January 1, 200_to December 31, 200__ Owner: (V\tL\ txS o ^ 2005 '="'^‘^'-o«o/vo OEC I Property Address: I2.to Lr■^^^v L-, Lr-> j 0<*r r%c>. 3>3(cM (include city and zip) Mailing Address (if different):___________________________________ Phone: (home) ^S2 - H~7 L- ^g>6 o RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Fee: $25.00 (payment must accompany application} Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time: ^ (over 6 months of age) (work) 7 - 2/D 30(o(o Principal Breed: 1 • 5e/-Ac.rA 9- Cor^t'. ^U ________________ Purpose for more than 2 dogs: U)p lr%te Dogs normally kept: inside____^kennel structure CO\IMERCIAL Kennel License Fee: $150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business: Business Activities: (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours: _________________ After Hours Contact: (name) (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigned hereby grants the City permission to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chap"*r 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. i2//r/zojj Date For dry Use Onlv Kennel inspected by\_ ______ Recomme^s: ApproVal Deni^ 1 Owner: KENNFL LICENSE APPLICATION J Effective January 1, 200^ to December 31, 200 Pronertv Address: 7^5" Q/Lc,4:^.Ui (include city and zip)rr4'‘'CliMailing Address (if different): Phone: fhome) ^(work). r If RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Fee: $25.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time: H (over 6 months of age) ^ Principal Breed: O ^ ^ _________ Purpose for more than 2 dogs: / _____ Dogs normally kept: inside____^kennel structure COMMERCIAL Kennel License Fee: $150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business:_________________ Business Activities: (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours:____________________________________ After Hours Contact: (name) (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are:____inside___outside__^both The undersigned hereby makes application to tie Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is pemussive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigned hereby grants the City permission to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. / ' ^ Applicant Date For City Use Onlv Kennel inspected by Recommends: Approval Denial *-5--oC/ J ORONO NT PERMIT ember 8, and / *ali%'c Offices: Lake Minnetonka Conscr\’alion i> the DNR at the Maxwell Bay □Idcr, on behalf of any and all e under the special event pennil. Tom all claims arising from said ms exercising authority under this rono. Its officers or employees for se of privileges granted by this mployees and offieers from any Ted to revoke this special event r.ediately resolved by the permit :ation shall cause the immediate lit. p CITY OF ORONO SPKCIAL EVENT PERIViH Hale Issucii: Dale of Kveiil: Time: May 10, 2004 June 11-14, 18-20, and 25-27, 2004 1:00 p.in. - 7:00 p.in., Fridays Noon - 6:00 p.m., SaHird.iys and Sundays Name of Pvrson(s) And/or OrKani/alion Sponsuriii}; IliU KvenI: Kori Mcewes l.undgrcn Hrolhers 545 Indian Mound Ulvd li VVay/^ta,MN 55391 IMioiie: 952-473-0993 Location of Kvcnl: 210 North Shutc Drive West Type of Kveiit: Luxury Home Tour Thr fiillowitii; dfic iiinciils arc rc(|iiirccl ami on file at the <*ity Adiiiinistrativc Otllccs: C citirifutc f)f(icncial I labilily Insiitancc (*4»py <»r Ncigli!)t»r Nolitkation Appioval ftoin Omiio lUilicc Dcpailmcnt Appioval fioin Oroiui HuiMing cV /onmp, ncpailnicnl The follii%vhi|» ronditioiu ha\e heeii placed on t\m event: • Pciinil lu)lilci miisl post ('ounly Riiad 1*^ tioiii Ntinh Aim Diivc to 100 Noitli Slunc l)ii\c W est Noith with ‘‘No Paiking" signs Both sides or the loa^l aie to be ptisted uith signs spaced at alnuit 100 loot intetvals. I iiinaiound at the hoiiK* must be laige enough tti accommodate latge SI'Vs without having to back up. 1 uinaiound and one side ol the diiveway must be pt>sted “No Parking*’ about every ^0 to 7S feet Notily nciglilnus tiltlie event dales and time I his notice slumld also include the name and phone num!)cr of a peison tliat has authoiity to lesolve neiglibor concerns I his sluiiiM be to a live person during tlie time of the event and not to a voice null. • Peimit holder is to provide da»ly clean up of the area from all debris caused by the event and to icmove all signs at the end of the event. • By acceptance of tins special event permit, the permit holdei. on behalf of any and all oigani/atums and pnvate persons, grants authority to opetate under the special event pcimil. agices to, mdciiuufy and hold hatiiiless the (*ity of Oropo from all claims arising tiom said c' cut The pciinit lioldei. all oigani/alions and piivale persons exercising anthorily under this pemut. do waive and iclease all daims agaiasi the ('ily of Oiono. us olTiceis or employees hu anv danuige to person or property arising fiom the exeicise of privileges gianlcJ by this pciinit and agrees to hf»M haimless the I'lty of Onuio. its emphnecs and ofUceis fioiii any such claim • 1 he (>iono Police Depaitmcn! and its officeis aic cmpoweicd to icv4»ke this special event p**imit at anv time foi any safety CfUK crns that ate not immediately resolved by the pciiiul boMei oi a lepiesentative of the peimit holder, fhis leviH atifui shall cause the immediate cancellation of the event originally authoii/cd by this permit. Approval at I'll) C'ouncil meeting on: May 10. 2004 (Cily Seal) Ronald J. Moorsc. Citv Admimstratoi :tso Kelley I’.iikway, F O Hox 66. ('lystal Hay. MN 55323 Plioiie: ‘J52-249-46(H) Fax: 95.L24‘> 4616 / ww-xv.a orono.mn.us Check Number Employee Name DODGE. RACHEL M. HERMAN. JOHN R. LESKtNEN. DENISE M. SILUS. BARBARA G ANDERSON. BRUCE L. BOBZIEN. SUF A BORIS. SCOTT W DEMBOUSKI. JAY C. ERICKSON. KURT R FARNIOK. CORREY L. FISCHENICH. DAN T MADSON. ADRIENNE M. MCNICHOLS. DAVID L. MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES PERSELL. WILLIAM R TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F. TOMCZYK. MARK W WITTKE, ANTHONY A. GAFFRON. MICHAEL P MEYER. WILLIAM C OMAN. LYLE E VANG.BRUCE L GREGORY. JAMES D HANSEN.STEVEN OBRIEN. RANDY L. PALM! GREGORY A RATHBUN. BARRY J SKREEN. DALE S ABRAHAMSON. FREDW JENSEN. RODNEY W ROSS. JOHN A SMYTH. KATHERINE R. STEFFENHAGEN. RONALD MOORSE. RONALD J VEE. LINDAS KUEHN, THOMAS M. OLSON. RONALD J PETTIT. TANDRA K ANDERSON. BRUCE L BOBZIEN. SUE A BORIS. SCOTT W BUDIG. STACIE M CORNICK. JAMFS L DAY SUSANJ FISCHER. CHRISTOPHER K GOOD. STEPHANY R. JOHNSON. JEFFREY MCNICHOLS. DAVID L. RUSSFTH. KYLE M. SCHOLNHOFF. JOHN B TOMCHFCK. LAWRENCE F. LEE.JOSEPHP PHARO. CHRISTOPHER M BOLTERMAN. MATTHEW A. CURTIS. MELANIE GAFFRON. MICITAEL P. OAPPA GREGORY A GUNDLACH. JANICE J OMAN. LYLE E. 054003 054038 054004 054005 054006 054007 054008 054009 054010 054011 054012 054013 054014 054015 054016 054017 054018 054019 054020 054021 054022 054023 054024 054025 054026 054027 Cu4028 054029 054030 054031 054032 054033 054034 003316 003317 003318 003319 003320 003321 003322 003323 003324 003325 003320 003327 003328 003329 003330 003331 003332 003333 003334 003335 003336 003337 003338 003339 003340 003341 CITY OF ORONO check register Pay Check Check Period Amount Date Check Status 8 $1,042 63 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 1 $4921 4/19/2004 Outstanding 8 $887 98 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $51221 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $380.35 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $47 02 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $1,431 35 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $1.553 74 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $1,579 66 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $1.604 49 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $1,508.20 4/14/2J04 Outstanding 6 $621 42 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $591 82 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $1,691 05 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $819 69 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $37925 4/14/2004 Outstanding 6 $1,370 49 4/14/2004 Outstanding 6 $1.399 23 4/14/2004 OutSianding 8 $1.428 50 4/14/2004 Outstanding 6 $549 87 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $64 72 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $1.32353 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $758 00 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $36644 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $450 38 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $909 16 4/14/2004 Outstanding a $1.12971 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $1,070.35 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $16840 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $206.99 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $15071 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $99 54 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $1,343 17 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $2,336.49 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $1,266 69 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $1,328 20 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $1,161 81 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $1,116.38 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $1,135 00 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $83000 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $20 00 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $83? 32 4/14/2004 Outstanding 3 $1,564 23 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $1,092 59 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $1,604 39 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $2,04945 4/14-'2004 Outstanding 8 $1,532 12 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $1.100 00 4/14/2004 Outstanding B $1,269 40 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $1.51467 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $900 00 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $315 19 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $845 01 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $33.23 4/14/2004 Outstanding 6 $1,058 36 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $125.00 4/14/2004 Outstanding 6 $1,810.50 4/14/2004 Outatanding 6 ;i.155.07 4/14/2004 Outstanding 8 $1.400 00 4/14/2004 Outstanding 04/27/04 11:29 AM Page 1 *”"’=riNG f 0 !004 city OF OftO/Vo CITY OF ORONO 04/27/04 11:29 AM Pags2 check register Check Pay Check Check Number Employee Name Period Amount Date Check Statue 003342 OEBAERE. DONALD L.8 $1,184.25 4/14/2004 Outstanding 003343 HANSEN. STEVEN 8 $77500 4/14/2004 Outstanding 003344 OBERAIGNER. SCOTT G.8 $1,252.53 4/14/2004 Outstanding 003345 OBRIEN. RANDY L.8 $500 00 4/14/2004 Outstanding 003346 PALMER. GREGORY A.8 $350 00 4/14/2004 Outotanding 003347 RATHBUN. BARRY J.8 $200 00 $61,144 14 4/14/2004 Outstanding 4 CITY OF ORONO 05/06/04 8 16 AM Pago < check register Chock Pay Chock Chock Numbor Employoo Name Poriod Amount Data Chock Status 054075 PETERSON. BARBARA 5 $32322 5/10/2004 Outstanding 054076 MCMILLAN. ELIZABETH T.5 $269.36 5/10/2004 Outstanding 054077 MOORSE. RONALD J.5 $369.40 5/10/2004 Outstanding 054076 SANSEVERE. ROBERT K.5 $269.36 5/10/2004 OuUtanding 054079 MURPHY. JAMES L.6 $269.36 5/10/2004 Outstanding 054080 WHITE. JAMES M.5 $269 36 $1,770 06 5/10/2004 Outstanding I CITY OF ORONO Check Detail Register® 05/07/04 12 16 PM Page 1 MAY 2004 Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 Primary Cash '^PaiiiThk# 075606 5/10/2004 BCA • FORENSIC SCIENCE LAB E 101-42110-437 Training 4 Development ($40.00) 23613 Total BCA • FOKcNSIC SCIENCE LAB ($40 00) Void Check 75506 ■paid Chk# 078082 5/1/2004 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 6101-42110-311 Data Processing Communication ($510 00) MN027150041 Void Check #78082 E 101-42110-550 Automotive Equipment ($36 00) Plates ToUl DEPT 0*= PUBLIC SAFETY ($546 00) Void Check #78082 'PaTd Chk#~078172 ' 5/6/To’04 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS E 101-41900-413 Office Equi'-'ont Rental ($1.939 32) 20629267 Void Check #78172 ($1,93932)Total ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS Paid Chk# 078245 5/1/2004 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY E 101-42110-311 Data Processing Communication __ $510 00 MN027150041 CJDN-lst Qtr 2004 Total DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY $510 00 Paid'Chk# 078246 5Tf/20dr SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA POLICE E 101-42110-437 Training & Development $40.00 5/5/2004 Field Sobriety/Seatbelt Tming Total SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA POLICE $40 00 Paid Chkr07824f 5/1/2004 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY E 101-42110-550 Aulorrotive Equipment $36 00 Plates Total DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY $36 00 License Plates • New Squads Paid Chk# 078248 5/10/2004 ACCLAIM BENEFITS E 101-41900-489 Other Miscellaneous Charges E 101 -41900-489 Other Miscellaneous Charges Total ACCLAIM BENEFITS $99 00 342650 $100 00 342651 COBRA - 4/2004 FSA Admin 4/2004 $199 00 Paid Chk1^T78^249 5/^0/2004 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS E 101-41900-413 Office Equipment Rental $841 22 20629267 Total ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS $841 22 Copier Lease - 4/1S-5/15 'p¥:d'Chk#'d78250 5/10/2004 ANDERSON. KRISTI E 101-45200-319 Other Professional Services E 101-41300-319 Other Professional Services Total ANDERSON. KRISTI $165 00 $205.00 5/3/04 $370 00^ Pk Minitues • 5/3 CC Minutes - 4/26 PaTd Chi5T67W51 5/10/2004 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SERVICES E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $115 40 6013-388226 Coffee • PW E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $114 00 6013-3«‘'227 Coffee-PD E 101-41900-201 Office supplies ___Coffee - PW Total ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SERVICES $343 40 Paid Chk# 07R252 5/10/2004 E 101-42110-437 Training & Development Total BCA - FORENSIC SCIENCE LAB BCA • FORENSIC SCIENCE LAB $40 00 23613 Intox Recert - Fischer $40 00 PaicTChk# 078253 5/10/2004 BCA/FORENSIC SCIENCE LAB E 101-42110-437 Training & Devclopmenl $45 00 4044940 E 101 -42110-437 Training & Development $45 00 4045590 ToUl BCA/FORENSIC SCIENCE LAB $90 OC Intox Rocort • Famiok Intox Recert - Wittke Pa>d Chk# 078254 5/10/2004 BEAUCHENE MAILING E 101-41900-352 Printing & Publishing $367 68 352 Mailing • Spring Newsietlar CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 05A)7/04 12:16 PM Page 2 MAY 2004 Ch#cl( Amt Invoica Comment Total BEAUCHENE MAILING $367.68 PaidChki 078255 5/10/2004 BERGERSON-CASWELL INC. E 601-49400>405 Repairs/Maint-Watermains/plant $129 00 124100000 Repair Valve -#3 Weil To* .1 BERGERSON-CASWELL INC.$129 00 Pa dChk# 078256 5/10/2004 BFI OF MINNESOTA, INC E 101-42260-404 Repaifs/Maint-Bldgt/Grounds Total BFI OF MINNESOTA, INC $190.95 1347632 Solid Waste/Nav Fire $190.95 Paid Chk# 078257 5/10/2004 BOBZIEN, SUE E 101-42110-437 Training & Development ToUl BOBZIEN. SUE $159 37 4/23/04 Mileage/Reg MN Worn Police $159.37 Paid Chk# 078258 5/10/2004 BUDGET PRINTING E 101-41900-201 Office supplies Total BUDGET PRINTING $117.13 30666 Plaques $11715 Paid Chk# 078259 5/10/2004 CARVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE E 101-42110-437 Training & Development $10 00 4/30/04 Adv Field Sob - McNichc's Total CARVER COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE $1000 Paid ChlUP 078260 5/10/2004 CECE*S SIGNS E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint-Btdgs/Grounds Total CECE'S SIGNS $8946 1658 Signs $8946 Paid Chk# 078261 5/10/2004 CENTERPOINT ENERGY E 602-49450-381 Gas & Electric E 601-49400-381 Gas & Electric E 601-49400-381 Gas & Electric E 10".-42260-381 Gas & Electric E101-42110-: ' Gas&Eiectnc E 101-41900-3b. Gas & Etectnc E 101-41900-381 Gas A Etectnc E 602-49450-381 Gas & Electric E 613-49630-381 Gas & Electric Total CENTERPOINT ENERGY $727.10 060006750600 Gas Service %7S 70 060006750600 Gas Service $914 75 060006750600 Gas Service $364 08 060006750600 Gas Service $174 37 060006750600 Gas Service $21311 060006750600 Gas Service $454.22 060006750600 Gas Service $18 17 060006750600 Gas Service $87.03 060006750600 Gas Service $2,528 53 Paid Chk# 078262 5/10/2004 CHICAGO TITLE E 225-45223-319 Other Professional Services ToUl CHICAGO TITLE $2,908 33 5/7/2004 $2,90833 Saga Hill Land Exchange Paid Chk# 078263 S/10/2004 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO E 101-42110.402 Repairs/N'aint-Auto Equip $108 00 2S282 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $31.69 2S313 E 101-42110-402 RepalrB/Mdint-Akito Equip $457 72 25318 E 101 -42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $30 69 25323 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $159.44 25333 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $261 98 25333 E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $32.92 25407 Total CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO $1.082 44 Light Bar Mamt - #196 Oil Change -191 Brakes • 193 Brakes -192 Battery #194 Ori.Trent^UIgn #197 Oil. «196 Paid Chk# 078264 5/10/2004 E 234-45680-412 Building RenUlt Total COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION $1.200 00 213L277254J Lease - Lurton 5/2004 $1.200 00 'PaidChk# .'78265 5/10/2004 CORCORAN, CITY OF r CITY OF ORONO 05/07/04 12.16 PM Page 3 Check Detail Register© MAY 2004 Check Amt Invoice Comment HI G 101-20805 Due to govts-Locat Total CORCORAN. CITY OF $305 76 Safe/Sober Corcoran Share Inv #2 $305 76 ‘PaidChk#’ 070266 ”" 5/10/2004 COUNTRY CAKE CUPBOARD E 101-42110*439 Meeting Expenses _____$42 00 5/10/04 Cake - Officer Reception Total COUNTRY CAKE CUPBOARD *"^5/’l0?2004 $42 00 PaidChk# 078267 5/10/2004 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES E 101-42260-407 Janitorial Services $166 38 84390 E 101-42260*407 Janitorial Services $186 38 85239 Total COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES Janitorial • Nav Fire Janitor;al - Nav Fire $372.76 Paid Chk# 078260 5/10/2004 CRAOUN'S RESORT AND CONF CENTR E 101-41300-437 Training & Development $309 87 Moorse Total CRAGUN'S RESORT AND CONF CENTR $309 87 Lodging-MCMA/MACA - Moorse PaidChk# 078269 5/10/2004 CROWN MARKING INC. E 101-41900-201 Office supplies Total CROWN MARKING INC. $42 07 120030 Name Plates - PC $4207 Paid Chk# 078270 5/10/2004 DCA • WIRE ONLY G 101-21719 DCA/Spending Accounts Total OCA-WIRE ONLY $802 24 4/28.'04 Flex Spending - 4/2004 $802 24 ^aldChki"*070271 * 5/10/2004 DE BAER eVd ON E 101 43000-437 Training & Development $48 00 4/29/04 Mileage - St eet School ToUl DEBAERE.DON $4600 PaiiTChka 070272 5/10/2004 DEPT OF ADM • INTERTECH GROUP E 101-42110-311 Data Processing Communication E 101 42110^321 Tetophone E 101-41900-321 Telephone E 602*49450-321 Telephone E 601-49400-321 Telephone ToUl DEPT OF ADM - INTERTECH GROUP $37 00 $40.14 $8025 $22 94 $11 47 DV0403C306 W04030603 W04030603 W04030603 W04030603 PVC Connections Phone Service 3/2004 Phone Service 3/2004 Phone Service 3/2004 Phone Service 3/2004 $200 80 PaidChki 0782/3 5/10/2004 DEPUTY REGISTRAR E 101 -42110-441 Licenses & Taxes Total DEPUTY REGISTRAR $9 50 LAC152 Registration - ilSB $9 50 PaidChk# 078274 5/10/2004 DIVERSIFIED SECURITY INC G 425-48945-520 Buildings and Slruclures $1.538 20 1779 L 425-48945-520 Buildings and Structures ToUl DIVERSIFIED SECURITY INC $1 536 80 1803 Nav Fire Access Sys - 2nd Half Security System Add On $3,075 00 PartChke 078275 5/10/2004 DOBO'S E 101-41110-439 Meeting Expenses ToUl DOBO S $196 76 5639 Meal$ • Work Sessiuts $196 76 l»aij C^kr078276 5/10/2004 E-2 RECYCLING E 101-43270-316 Conlrac! Recycling Pickup $6,518 20 6579 Recycling - 5/2004 Tout E-ZRECYCUNG $6,518 20 ’Pa3*dhk# 0/82/7 5/10/2004 ELLIS. JOAN E E 101-41300-319 Other Professional Services E 101-42400-319 Other Professional Services D 101-41300-319 Other Professional Services $165 00 April 2004 $340 00 April 2004 $165 00 Apnl2004 Board of Review - 4/21 PC Minutes-4/19 CC Minutes - 4/12 n ' ^ • CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® C5/07/04 12 16 PM Page 4 MAY 2004 Cheek Amt Invoice Comment Total ELUS. JOAN E $670 00 Paid chEI*^ i alt B‘ '''TC mT o/zom enoT nee^o'^ E 101-41900-201 Office supplies Total ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS $131 53 67457 Scan./Coples $131.53 Paid Chki 0' «279 5/16/2C'.;4 ESS BROTHERS & SONS E 602-49450-227 Utility Svstem Maint. Supplies $109 57 GG1231 Riser Rings ToUl ESS BROTHERS S SONS $189.57 Paid Chk# 076280 S/10/2004 FORTIS BENEFITS G 101-21713 LTD Insurance $630.36 4019625-1 LTD Insurance - 5/2004 Total FORTIS BENEFITS $830.36 Paid Ch«(i 078261 5/KV2004 0 S K SERVICES E 101-42260-404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Qrouncjs $124 51 1006865069 Mat Service - Nav Fire E 602-49450-226 Clothing & personal equipment $34.95 1006876731 Uniforms E 613-49630-226 Clothing & personal equipment $575 1006876731 Uniforms E 101-43000-226 Clothing & personal equipment $6989 1006876731 Uniforms E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $42 81 1006876731 Shop Towels E 601 -40400-226 Clothing & personal equipment $11.65 1006876731 Uniforms Total 0&KSERV1CES $289.56 Paid ChK« 078262 5/10/2004 GALL'S INC. E 10M2110-226 Clotliing & paraonal equipment $174.98 570232960 Boots Total GALL'S INC.$174.98 Paid Chl^ 078283 5/10/2004 GERRING'S CAR WASH E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $6 00 5/3A)4 Car Wash E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $16 50 5/4/04 Car Wash E 101 -42110-403 Repairs/Maint-Misc Equip $11 00 5/4/04 Car Wash Total GERRING'S CAR WASH $35 50 PaidChk# 078284 5/10/2004 GOPHER CASH REGISTER CO £ 613-49830-201 Office supplies $5 59 23641 Kay Total GOPHER CASH REGISTER CO $5 59 PaidChk# 078285 5/10/2004 GRE(K)RY, J/UNES E 101-43000-437 Training A Development $48 00 4/29/04 Mileage - Street School Total GREGORY. JAMES $48 00 PaidChk# 078286 5/10/2004 HANSEN, STEVEN C. E 101-43000-437 Training & Development $48 00 4/29/04 Mileage • Street School E 101-43000-226 Clothing A personal equipment $86 35 4/29/04 Steel Toe Boots Total HANSEN. STEVEN C.$134 35 Paid Chki 078287 5/10/2004 HENNEPIN COUNTY tNFOR TECH OPT E 101-42110-414 EDP/Communications Equip Rent $1.541 89 24048026 Radio Lease 4/2004 Tout HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TECH DPT $1,541 89 Paid Chki 078288 5/10/2004 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF E 101-41600-309 Jail Charges $397.96 128 Booking Fees -1-3/2004 E 101-41600-309 Jail Charges $282 68 164 Booking Fees - April 2004 Total HENNEPINCOUNTY8HERIFF $680 64 si E 65Mg91(M41 UcsnsM&TwM $3522 S/ISAM 3411623440034 Ryde« CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 05/07/04 12.16 PM Page 5 MAY 2004 Check Amt Invoice Comment E 254-45660*441 Liceniet & Taxes Total HENNEPIN COUNTY TR PROP TAXES $847 71 5/15/04 Lurton ParH Pe:s Prop Tax S8d293 PaidChW 078290 5/10/2004 HENNEPIN COUNTY TR-TAX PYR SRV E 101-41410-322 Postage $5B M_4/13rt)4 ToUl HENNEPIN COUNTY TR-TAX PYR SRV $58 80 Postal Verifications PaidChK# 078291 ' S7TO«664 “ HENNEPIN COUNTY fREASURER^AIL E 101-41600-309 Jail Charges ___$102J30 447 ToUl HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-JAIL $102.00 TSfid th1iy07M92 SrrdSoM HUEBSCH RENTAL SERVICE E 613-49830-404 Repalrs4Vaint-8ldgs/Orout^dS . 978052 Total HUEBSCH RENTAL SERVICE $26 76 Room and Board 3/20C4 Mat Service - GC ^aidChki 078293 5/10/2004 HUMANE SO cTe W OF WR'tGHf*c6 E 101-42110-317 Animal Care $953 80 4/21.'04 1st Qtr 2004 Impound Tout HUMANE SOCIETY OF WRIOHT CO $95380 PaidChk# 078294 5/10/2004 INTOXIMETERS E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $205 01 142602 Mouthpieces Total INTOXIMETERS $2~0501 Paid Chke 076295 5/10/2004 JOHNSON. RICK E 101 -42110-319 Other Professional Services $82 50 5/2/04 Deer Removal Total JOHNSONs RICK $62 50 PaidChk* 078296 5/10/2004 JOHNSTON FARGO CULVERT, INC. E 651-49910-227 Utility System Mamt. Supplies $6,251.55 130724 Culverts E 651-49910-227 Utility System Maint Supplies $4.575_24_ 130724 Culverts Total JOHNSTON FARGO CULVERT. INC.$10,82079 PaidChka 078297 V10/2004 JORSTAD ft REUTHER COM E 101-41900-352 Printing ft Publishing $560 00 2186 Design/Prod - Spring Newsfetta Total JORSTAO ft REUTHER COM $560 00 PaidChk# 078298 5/10/2004 KEEPERS C 101-42110-226 Clothing & personal equipment $152 65 24235 Shirts - Boris Total KEEPERS $152 85 Paid Chk* 078299 5/10/2004 KENNEDY ft GRAVEN, CHARTERED E 234-45660-307 egal-Consultmg $126 00 61201 MNDOT/Lurton Matter E 101-43290-800 Speaal Pro|ects, Contingency $162 00 61201 MNDOT/Borgert Matter ToUl KENNEDY A GRAVEN. CHARTERED $268 00 7»ttidChk# 078300 5/10/2004 KENNETH N. POTTS. PA E 101-41600-306 Legal-Prosecution $2 500 00 S/4/2004 Prosecutions 4/2004 Total KENNETH N. POTTS. PA $2500 00 C 613-49830-201 Ofhea supplies Total LAKE BUSINESS SUPPLY $22 M_ 76240 $22 94~ Appoinimen Book -GC 1®’(ihk#"o78302' W10/2004 LOGIS E 101-42110-310 LOGIS-Appltcations E 101-42110-329 Other Communicetk>ns E 101 -41900-329 Other Communications $1.676 00 24017 $196 50 24017 $196 50 24017 Police Records 5/2004 Internet 5/2004 Internet 3/2004 CITY OF ORONO Check Detail Register© 05/07/04 12; 16 PM Page 6 MAY 2004 Check Amt Invoice Comment E 101-41900-311 E 101-41900-401 E 101-4^900-401 E 101-42110-401 E 227-45500-570 E 101-42110-401 E 101-41900-401 E 101-42110-401 Data Processing Communication $30 00 24017 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip $176 00 24076 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip $44.00 24076 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip $176.00 24076 Office Equip and Fum'jhings $6,651 50 24076 Repairs/Maint-OfTice Equip $125 00 24076 Repairs/Maint-OfTice Equip $125 00 24076 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip $44 00 24076 Total LOGIS $9.640 50 Henn Cty Connct 3/2004 Virus Defn Updates GW Remote Access Virus Defn Updates Server 2003 Conversion Web Site Issues Web Site Issues GW Remote Access Paid Chk# 076303 5/10/2004 MCLEOD USA - PHONE BILLS E 601-49400-321 Telephone E 602-49450-321 Telephor>e E 101-42110-321 Telephone E 101-41900-321 Telephone E 602-49450-321 Telephone E 601-49400-321 Telephone Tout MCLEOD USA-PHONE BILLS $42.95 4584787 $51.75 4584787 $199 59 4584787 $465 72 4584787 $39.45 4584787 $22.18 4584787 Phone Service Phone Service Phone Service Phc.^.e Service Phone Service Pf4)ne Service $821.64 Paid Chk# 078304 5/10/2004 MEDIA COM E 613-49830-415 Other Equipment Rentals $5 58 39831 Equip Rental Total MEDIA COM $558 Paid Chk# 078305 5/10/2004 MEDINA. CITY OF G 101 -20805 Due to govts-Local Tout MEDINA. CITY OF $494.00 Safe/Sober Medina Share - Inv #2 $494 00 nm-rnm-rnm Paid Chk# 078306 5/10/2004 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER G 101-20809 SAC Charges due to MWee $1.350 00 4/2004 R 101-39610 Miscellaneous Revenue ($135 00) 4/2004 Total MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER ~ $T215 00 Sac Fees - 4/2004 Sac Fees • 4/2004 Paid Chk# 078307 5/10/2004 MIDWEST FUELS E 613-49830-212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants Tout MIDWEST FUELS $869 72 15741 $P6972 Unleaded/Diesel - OC Pa d Chk# 078308 5/10/2004 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $16 29 RI04040864 Cylinder Rental Total MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY $1629 Paid Chk# 078309 5/10/2004 F 101 -43000-489 Other Miscellaneous Charges Total MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED OIST MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DIST $8 30 04-123 B g Island Access - Permit $8 30 Pvd SliitT078310 5/10/2004 MINNETONKA BEACH, afv OF R 101-32240 Dog Licenses ^otal MINNETONKA BEACH, CITY OF $55 00 4/20/04 Dog Impound - Spencer $55 00 Paid Chk# 078311 5/10/2004 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY E 601-49400-441 Licensat & Taxes E 601-49400-441 Licenses & Taxes E 101-43000-441 Licenses & Taxes Tout MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY $100.00 271700C0303 $100 00 27170000403 $25.00 27170000603 Right-to-Know Right-to-Know Right-lo-Know $225.00 Paid Chk# oysaiT 5/10/2004 MN/SCIA E 101 -42110-433 Memberships & Subscriptions E101-42110-433 Membenhips & Subscriptions $16.00 04-11 $18.00 04-337 2004MNSCIA-Erickson 2004 MNSCiA-Comick CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® CS/CZ.W 12 16 PM Page? Total MN/SCIA MAY 2004 Check Amt Invoice Comment $36.00 PaldChki 0783T3* * 57l0/2004 MTD COMMUNICATIONS, INC E 613-49830*340 General Advertising $225 00 4^6/04 ToUl MTD COMMUNICATIONS. INC $225 00 Print Adv • Amencmn Pald’Chk# 078314 5/10/2004 MTIDIST CO. E 613-49830-403 Ropairs/Maint-Misc Equip E 613-49630-403 Repairs/Maint-Misc Equip E613-49830-403 Repairs/Maint-Misc Equip E 613-49830-403 Repairs/Maint-Misc Equip E 613-49830-223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies ToUl MTI GIST CO. $519 11 399319 $96 78 400768 $3 96 400771 $390 79 401277 $28 76 402719-00 Foot Valve irrigation Parts Irrigation Parts Open Irrigation System Course Supplies $1.039 40 TaidChkil)78315 5/10/2004 NAVARRE HARDWARE E 101-43000-224 Street Maint. Matrnals/Supply E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 601-49400-223 Bidg/Grounds Maint Supplies E 602 49450-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 602-49450-222 Vehicle Equipment & Paits E 602-49450-222 Vehicle Equipment & Parts E 101-42110^221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 101-43000-224 Street Maint Materials/Supply E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 101 -42110-201 Office supplies E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 601-49400-240 Small Tools and Minor Equip E 602-49450-227 Utility System Maint Supplies E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $14 04 132297 $27 67 132298 $11 99 132308 $4 57 132325 $1276 132407 $6 57 132413 $1816 132420 $1029 132436 $2 20 132665 $17.35 132908 $7 18 132941 $3 18 133160 $3 82 133232 $41 50 133236 $2 65 133260 Ontl Oit Phone Charger Cieaing Supplies Batteries Light Bulbs Misc Hardware Keys. Cleaning Supplies Letters Misc Hardware Cleaning S'lppties Bungee Cords Knee Pads Light Buibs Phone chargor Drain Pan E 60M9400-201 Office supplies $2 65 133261 Soap E 601-49400-227 Utility System Mamt Supplies $24 41 133461 MiSC Hardware E 613-49830-223 Bldg/Grounds Maint Supplies $14 22 133553 Numbers E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $1 69 133719 Key E 101-45200-404Repairs/Maint* Bldgs/Grounds $9 20 133748 Misc Hardware E 101-45200-223 Bldg/Orounds Maint Supplies $44 32 133865 Deadbolt E 602-49450-227 Utility System Mamt Supplies $1661 134041 Marking Pamt E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $12 76 1 34097 Flour Bulb E 601-49400-727Utility System Mamt Supplies $1 07 134456 Bull Anchors E 613-49830-223 Bldg/Grounds Mamt Supplies $32 48 134460 Building Suppftes E 613-49830-223 BkJg/Grounds Maint Supplies $10 20 134461 Misc Supplies E 613-49830-223 Bldg/Grounds Maint Supplies ($10 52) 134470 Return E 10M5200-223 Bldg/Grounds Mamt Supplies $21 44 134482 Battery, Suppl es E 101-45200 223 Bldg/Grounds Mamt Supplies $53 19 1 34496 Primer, Finish E 601 49400 227 Utility System Mamt Supplies $1702 134505 Galv Brace t 101-43000-224 Street Mamt Materials/Suoply $29 79 1 34527 Lathe. Brush E 101-45200-223 Btdg/Grounds Maint Supplies $9 55 134609 Basketball Net 1 E 613-49830-223 Bldg/Grounds Maint Supplies $26 60 134646 Stain. Wood Finish E 601-49400-227 Utility System Mamt Supplies $3 83 134656 Misc Hardware r. 601-49400-227 Utility System Mamt Supplies $18.48 134G57 Enamel, Primer E 10145200-223 Bkjg/Grounds Mamt Supplies $26 55 134073 Trash Bags, paint E 101-41900-201Office supplies _$8 47 1 34945 Keys I f ToUl NAVARRE HARDWARE $559.04 6/10/2004 G 101-21710 Life Insurance $304.00 6732504 PERAUf9 5a0Q4 CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 05/07/04 12:16 PM Pages MAY 2004 Check Amt Invoice Comment Total NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS $304 00 Paid Chk# 078317 5/10/2004 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS E 101 <42110-321 Telephone $606 57 506573311-02Police Cell Phones Total NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS $806.57 Paid Chk# 078318 ^10/2004 OBRIEN. RANDY E 101-43000-437 Training & Development $48 00 4/27/04 Mileage • Street School ToUl OBRIEN, RANDY $46.00 PaidChk* 078319 ^10/2004 ODE, PAUL R 101-32110 Beer & Liquor Licenses $2,600.004/28A>4 Liquor License Refund Total ODE, PAUL $2,600.00 PaMChM 078320 5/10/2004 OFFICE DEPOT E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $161 49 242638309 Office Supplies E 101-41900-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $212 99 242638309 Shredder E 101-42110-201 Office supplies $161.50242638309 Office Supplies E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $118.17242638309 Ext CD Rom Drive E 101-42110-201 Office supplies $205.86 243136257-00Office Supplies E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $205 86 243136257-00Office Supplies E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $26.52 243138452-00Office Supplies E 101-42110-201 Office supplies $2652 243138452-00Office Supplies E 101-42110-201 Office supplies $9262 243841827-00Office Supplies E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $92 62 243841827-00Office Supplies E 101-42110-201 Office supplies $141.96 243943576-00Office Supplies E 101-41900-201 Office supplies $141 98 243943576-00Office Supplies ToUl OFFICE DEPOT $1,588.11 Paid Chk# 078321 5/10/2004 PHARO, CHRIS E 101-42110-201 Office supplies $11.87 4/26/04 Lens Cloth Total PHARO. CHRIS $11 87 Paid Chk#'078322' 5/10/2004 PIONEER E 101 -42400-340 General Advertising $8955 976 Applications E 101-41900-352 Printing & Publishing $31.84 984 Board Of Appeals E 601-49400-352 Printing & Publishing $284.57 989 Drinking Water Rpt Tout PIONEER $405.96 Patd Chk# 078323 5/10/2004 POWEKCLEAN COMPANY INC. E 101-41900-407 Janitorial Services $931 34 10310 Janitorial 1/2C04 E 101-42110-407 Janitorial Services $76201 10310 Janitorial 1/2004 E 101-41900-407 Janitorial Services $931.34 10311 Janitorial 2/2004 E 101-42110-407 Janitortal Services $76201 10311 Janitorial 2/2004 Tout POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC.$3,386.70 Paid Chk# 078324 5/10/2004 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS E 101-41900401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip $156 00 76349 Maint Contact • Oicta.>ticn -Otal PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS $156.00 Paid Chk* 078325 5/10/2004 PRESS ft NEWS PUBLICATIONS E 613-49830-340 General Advertising $297 00 4/23A)4 Print Adv-GC Total PRESS A NEWS PUBLICATIONS $297.00 PaidChki 078326 5/10/2004 QWEST E 61349830-321 Telephone $61.28 9524739904 PhonflServIcB CITY OF ORONO 'Check Detail Register® 05/07/04 12 16 PM Page d MAY 2004 Check Amt Invoice Comment Total QWEST $61.28 PaidChk* 07B327 S/10/2004 RED PEDERSON UTILITIES. INC G 602-20600 Contracts PayabI* ($1.67078) RFP1 G 602-16500 FIxeti Asset-Const in progress __________ Tout RED PEDERSON UTILITIES, INC $31.744 87 $33.415 65 RFP1 RFP#1 - Homestead Rd San Swr RFP#1 - Homestead Rd San Swr PaidChk# 076326 5/10/2004 REED VENDING E 613-49900-093 Concessions For Resale-Txbl E 613-49900-092 Soft Drinks Per Resale ToUl REED VENDING S60 70 4541 $105 00 4541 Concessions for Resale Soda for Resale $165 70 Paid Chk# 076329 5/10/2004 SAFE ASSURE E 601 -49400-437 Training & Development E 101-43000-437 Training & Development E 602-49450-437 Training 6 Development Total SAFE ASSURE $1.165 00 1 $1,165.00 1 $1.16500 1 2004 Safety Training 2004 Safety Training 2004 Safety Training $3,495.00 Paid Chk« 078330 5/10/2004 SBC PAGING E 101-42110-321 Telephone Total SBC PAGING $30 58 20261005043 Pagers • PD $30 58 Paid Chk# 078331 5/10/2004 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES E 101-41800-490 Contnbut’ons to Civic Org’s $4.145 00 5/3/04 Tout SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES $4,145 00 2nd Qtr 2004 - Sr Services Paid Chk# 078332 5/10/2004 SIMPLOT PATNERS-NATIONAL SEED E 613-49830-223 Bldg/Grounds Mainl. Supplies $553 80 383288SI Fertilizer Total SIMPLOT PATNERS-NATIONAL SEED $553.80 Paid Chk# 076333 5/10/2004 STAR TRIBUNE E 101-42110-433 Memberships & Subscriptions E 101-41900-201 Office supplies Total STAR TRIBUNE $27 95 1069427 $27 95 3009532 Newspaper • 6/4-9/3/04 • PD Subscription 5/13-8/12/04 $55 90 Paid Chk# 078334 5/10/2004 THORPE DIST CO. E 613-49900-091 Beer For Resale Total THORPE DIST CO. $143 00 332586 Beer for Resale $143 00 P^ai¥ehk#T78335 S/io72004 TW-c Wn IyTa W^ENF^^^ E 101-42110-433 Memberships & Subscriptions $60 00 2004 2004 Membership Total TRI-COUNTY LAW ENFORC ASSOC $60 00 r - Paid Chk# 078336 5/10/2004 VEE» LIN E 101-41110-439 Meeting Expenses $73 97 5/6/04 Food for Workshops Total VEE, LIN $7397 Paid Chk# 078337 5/10/2004 VERIZON DIRECTORIES E 613-49830-340 General Advertising ToUl VERIZON DIRECTORIES $18 20 380007594501 Directory Adv $18.20 Paid Chk# 078338 5/10/2004 VERIZON WIRELESS E 101-41900-321 Telephone Total VERIZON WIRELESS $184 66 3534647626 Cell Phones $184 66 Paid Chk# 078339 8710/2004 XCEL ENERGY E 101-42260*381 Gas 8 Electric $361 78 118154914711 Electncity - Navarre Fire CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 05A)7/04 12 16 PM Page 10 MAY 2004 CHecte Amt Invoice Comment Total XCEL ENERGY 10100 Primary Cash S361.76 1107.95184 Fund Summary 10100 Primary Cash 101 GENERAL FUND $42,042.25 225 PARK FUND $2,906.33 227 IMPR/EQUIP CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND $6,651.50 234 LURTON PARK $2,173.71 425 NAVARRE FIRE STATION PROJ FUND $3,075.00 601 WATER OPERATING FUND $3.032 01 602 SEWER OPERATING FUND $33.60930 613 GOLF COURSE $3.59973 651 STORM WATER UTILITY OP FUND $10,862.01 $107,953.84 U 1^,, 1 0 2004 ' r Uh UHO^o • \ •information • • items COUNCIL MEETING »»PRT1NG i:.V;' 1 0 2004 OF CnvOFORONO udkitu —rrri—.roi 1‘v* r*’ f 'V' Orono (BoarcC of 'Education myites f - ^ you to a ceCeBratUm for ^ . * 1' >-• r... »• ■. ■* you to a ceCeBrationfi 1 V Vr. Thomas 3. Micfi • ' :N.'. =' -r' Superintendent of Orono 'PuBCic Schoois •.*. • -n-):- •'/ * for the past i8 years. . ; . ;r ■■ ' siso —ysop.m. ■■ [ : ^ • 'Program at 4:30 p.nu ; ; ; . = • . • 'Wednesday, May 26, 2004 . I / . ► 'i . Schoofs 'District Office .AssemBCy 'PjoOm'^ ^^ I •», r t •■» •< , - •in acknowCee^enieht of Tom ’s dedication to quaCity , _ . education and to the students at Orono Schoois, ♦ • \ \ ^ ^istrict 2^S Orono S\diance EcBicationaCTund ■. r •:r -^ v; V-;■V has Been estaBhshedin his name.• f / .1 V.•> i r 1-«•\ ‘ Tyr. Thomas Orono MUmce EducatiohaCfvmt. tl' - ■•; • •ArV-vJ* > $5.00 Donation : $25.00 Donation ; \ $15.00 Donation- Other_______r . V'-; send your check payaBCe to Orono Schoois, • V' % i ^ • •. '' ^ ' '• * District Office, 685 OCdCrystaCBay (RoadMorth ; , ; £on0 Lake, MM 55356 :► i A • * •» I A ^ ‘ v> -^ ^ \ hope you can share in.this occasidfL's ‘ f * '< V't* . ' • ^ * ■ , *• I I * Jf»