HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-03-2004 Council Work Sessionc
c
c
TO: Mayor Peterson and Council Members
FROM: Ron Moorse, City Administrator ^/r
DATE; July 30,2004
SUBJECT: Budget Workscssion Agenda
The Council will meet at 5:30 p.m. on August 3, 2004, to review the 2005 preliminary budget
overview. The purpose of the preliminary budget overview is to provide the Council with an outline of
the proposed budget, including the main items affecting expenditures and revenues, key issues involved
in balancing expenditures and revenues, and the major short-term and long-term financial issues facing
the City, and the impact of the proposed budget on the tax levy. The budget overview focuses on t: le
General Fund, because it has the greatest impact on the tax levy.
Proposed Worksession Agenda
1. Staff presents an overview of the General Fund Budget, including the main goals of the budget,
the key initiatives in the budget, significant expenditure items and significant revenue changes,
and the impact of the proposed budget on the tax levy.
2. Department Heads provide information on the initiatives specific to their departments.
3. The Council discusses the proposed budget goals and initiatives, and obtains additional
information, if desired.
4. The Council determines whether the proposed goals and initiatives match their priorities, and
whether the proposed tax levy is acceptable.
n
c
TO:
FROM;
DATE:
Mayor Peterson and Council Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
July 30,2004
SUB.IECT: 2005 Budget Preliminaty Overv iew
The proposed 2005 budget reflects an effort to address a number of deferred needs, as well as to fund a
number of special projects, while managing the impact of the tax levy on property owners.
Go.ils of the 2005 Biidp.ct
Tlie following is an outline of the goals of the 2005 budget
m
m
m
m
m
To improve ser\'ice delivery and customer ser\’ice
To increase the City ’s capacity to use information technology
To improve the maintenance of the City ’s infrastructure
To provide funding for identified priority projects
To begin to address long term public improvement needs
Onnortunity To Address Deferred Needs
for at least the past ten years, the focus of the budget development process has been to minimize tlie tax
levy. Over the past 10 years, the tax levy has been increasing at an average rate of 3.98% per year.
I his has been an important element in enabling the city ’s tax rate to remain one of the lowest in the
County. Over the past several years, a number of needs have been identified, and budget projections
demonstrating the City ’s ability to address those needs within reasonable property tax impacts have
been prepared. 1 lowcvcr, conservative caution regarding potential State budget problems, and then the
octual impacts of the State budget problems, including levy limits, have caused the needs to be deferred.
1 he 2005 budget is the ftrst opportunity the City has had to address the deferred needs, in order to have
a substantial impact i»ii the level and quality of services provided in Uie areas of Police. Fire. Streets,
Parks, Stormwater Managetnent. Sewer, and Water, as well as substantially strengthening the City ’s
ability to use and manage technology to improve productivity and customer service. The proposed
2005 budget includes a stibstantial increase in the tax levy to enable a number of these high priority,
deferred needs to be met.
Although it would be possible to further defer a fK>rtion of the needs to a future year, the budget
includes the proposed level of funding for a number of reasons. First, these needs are not going aw ay.
Tliey will need to be funded at some point.
Second, the proposed budget docs not fully address all of the deferred needs. Additional long term
fimtling of necessary public improvements, such as mrijor street rehabilitation, stormwater drainage
I!
(
(
c
improvements, and park improvements, as well as additional police staffing needs, will need to be
addressed in future budgets. It is important that the City takes a substantial step toward increased
funding at this time, both to address a substantial portion of the deferred needs, and to put itself into a
position to be able to continue to address the remainder of the deferred needs in future budgets.
Tliird, the expiration of levy limits provides the flexibility to provide the necessary ftinding. It is
uncertain whether this flexibility will be available in future years.
General Fund Budget Expenditures
lire proposed expenditures in the General Fund are having the greatest impact on the tax lev>'. The
proposed 2005 General Fund expenditures are $5,114,190. This is an increase of $413,540, or 8.8%
over the 2004 budget. A summary of the major items causing the General Fund expenditure increase is
as follows:
• AlUlual pay adjustments. (The proposed budget reflects a 3%
increase in pay schedules).
$53,000
• Cafeteria Benefit Plan contribution increase. 1 he proposed
expenditures reflect an increase in the City's contribution toward
employee health insurance and other benefit options in the cafeteria
benefit plan from $500.00 per month to $540.00 per month.
$21,000
• The addition of a second Police Investigator.$60,000
■ The addition of a part-time Finance Clerk to enable the I.T.
Coordinator/Assistant Finance Director to spend more time on I.T.
activities.
$33,417
• The addition of a seasonal Park Maintenance position.$10,165
■ Navarre Fire Station operating costs.$30,000
• Providing increased training opportunities focused on enhancing the
use of technology.
$5,500
• Initiating a tuition reimbursement program in the Police
Department to encourage and enable continuing education and
professional development.
$6,000
• Providing initial or partial funding for the Navane strectscaping
project.
$20,000
• Funding for a consultant to assist in planning related to the turnback
of Highway 12.
$20,000
(Jcncral Fund Revenue HiohliEhts
Most General Fund revenues arc relatively stable. 1 he most significant increases arc in the tax le\7 and
tiic police service re\ emies. A tabic showing the re\ enues proposed to fund the General Fund budget is
c.attached.
C
Tax Levy
The total tax levy required to ftind the proposed 2005 budget is $3,461,670. I his is an increase of
$263,740, or 8.25 % over the 2004 levy. Tlie breakout of the use of tax levy revenues by fund is shown
on the attached chart titled Tax Levies. Tlie General Fund expenditures have the greatest impact on the
proposed tax levy. In addition, the Infrastructure levy in the PIR Fund (for street rehabilitation) has
been increased from $35,940 to $85,950.
The tax levy required to fund the proposed 2005 General Fund budget is $2,990,470. This is an
increase of $339,240, or 12.8% over the 2004 levy amount. Of this amount, $125,000 is not a levy
increase, but rather is a shifting of tax levy from the Improv ement and Equipment Outlay Fund to the
General Fund. Excluding the $125,000 of expenditures shifted to the General Fund, the levy increase
is $214,240, or 8.1%.
Although the General Fund tax levy is proposed to increase substantially, the funding will address a
number of high priority needs, which will provide substantial benefits in terms of increased service
levels, productivity, customer service, consultant assistance regarding tlie Highway 12 turnback, and a
jump start to the Navarre streetscaping project.
Tax Capacity Rate and Impact ol the Tax Levy on Property Owners
Although the County has not yet prov ided an estimate of the City’s tax capacity, based on the annual
property revaluation conducted by the County Assessor, it is estimated that the City's tax capacity (or
tax base) has increased by approximately 10%. Applying the proposed tax levy- to the estimated tax
capacity results in a tax rate of 17.378“/i, which is a slight reduction from the 2004 level of 17.599 %.
Using this tax rate, the City’s share of the property tax bill on a home valued at $300,000, assuming a
5% value increase, will increase by $$ 18.18, or 3.4%. For a home valued at $800,000, the City's share
of the property tax bill will increase by $$48.47, or 3.4%.
Police Stalling
The Police Department has identitled the need for three additional officers. These include a second
investigator, a narcotics investigator, and a patrol olTicer. I hc proposed 2005 budget reflects the
addition of the investigator position.
The Department’s current investigative caseload is too large for one officer. Other Departments of
Orono’s si/e (and smaller) have two investigators, (i.e.Mound, Excelsior). The Depanment’s greatest
criticism from citizens during the past three y ears has been about poor follow-up on case reports. T he
investigator is much more effective when he has a partner who can back him up on .stime interv iews and
investigations When the School Liaison Officer was available during the summer to assist in
investigations, the clearance rate increased and many more cases received inv esligativv attention. The
c
V
c
addition of the Investigator position is the best way to substantially improve responsiveness and
customer service.
The joint drug task force with Hennepin County, Medina, Mound, and West Hennepin Public Safety
requires a full-time narcotics investigator. A current full time patrol officer has been assigned to the
narcotics investigator position. Initially, the patrol position will be back-filled by a pan-time officer. A
private fundraising effort is planned to provide transition funding for the narcotics investigator for one
year. Tlie City will tlien need to fund this position. Tliis funding will need to be included in the 2006
budget.
The Department is currently staffed with two officers during the night shift. Whenever a night shift
officer calls in sick, filling the shift requires overtime. In many cases, the shift can only be filled by
someone who has already worked eight hours that day. Asking otticers to work Ibr 16 hours, especially
if there is no break between shifts, raises both officer safety and public safety concerns. Also, when
there are only two officers on the street, neither of them can do proactive enforcement (i.c. follow-up on
cases, DWI’s, etc,) because those activities can take them off the street for e.\tended periods of time.
The Department is receiving increased requests for ser\ice in Long Lake, especially related to the
Highway 12 construction project. The Department does not Itavc enough officers to respond to these
additional serv ice requests. The daytime service problem could be corrected by adding an officer for
traffic enforcement Monday to Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Finance/Information Technology (1..T.) staffing
As the City has expanded its information technology capabilities, both in terms of the number of
computers available and the number of applications available, the workload related to maintaining the
computers and the applications has increased. As we continue to expand our information technology
capabilities, this need will continue to increase. Also, we need to ensure the expansion of our l.f.
capabilities occurs in a wel.-planned manner. This requires a coordinated effort to develop a multi-year
I.T. plan.
The City currently has one staff person who is responsible for the bulk of the I.T. responsibilities. This
is the Assistant Finance Director/I.T. Coordinator. As the title indicates, a substantial portion of this
position ’s time is spent on finance-related tasks. There is not sufficient time to adequately address all
of the I.T. needs. It is proposed that a part-time finance clerk be hired to take on a significant portion of
the Assistant Finance Director/I.T.Coordinator ’s finance-related workload. Tlie Assistant Finance
Director would continue to carry out the higher level finance tasks, but would have a substantial amount
of additional time to handle I.T. tasks.
Sea.sonal Park Maintenance Position
Currently, the Public Works maintenance staff provides limited park maintenance. Particularly in a wet
year like the current year, parks maintenance is a lower priority than addressing drainage problems and
street maintenance problems. In addition, as \vc have transitioned away from the Public Works
c
c
Superintendent position, a number of new priorities in the water and sewer areas have been identified.
If we want to make day-to-day park maintenance a higher priority. \ e need to assign that responsibility
to a specific person. Since park maintenance is largely a seasonal need, it is most cost-effective to
address this need with a seasonal maintenance position.
New Public Works Staffing
With the elimination of the Public Works Superintendent position, the Public Works Department has
been operating with a Public Works Director and two interim working foremen. This structure has
facilitated much discussion about priority public works maintenance needs. It has also facilitated
substantially increased productivity. The needs in the areas of stormwater drainage, improved
maintenance of the water system (i.e. initiating a regular program of hydrant flushing and repairs of
water shut-off valves) and improved maintenance ot the sewer system (i.e. increased monitoring of lilt
stations, and increased cleaning and televising of sewer lines) arc well beyond the capacity of the
current staffing level. At minimum, an additional full-time maintenance position is needed.
The cost of a full-time maintenance position, and of the additional pay level of the two working
foreman positions, is equivalent to the cost of the former Public Works Superintendent position. The
additional maintenance position can be added without increasing costs.
I.T. Training
As the management team has met to develop priorities, tlic number one identified need is to strengthen
our information tecimology capabilities. As indicated above, one key to this is to provide more time for
the I.T. Coordinator to deal with I.T. needs. Another key is to provide training to increase staff's I.T.
capabilities. Several years ago, the City purchased a software system to provide a broadly integrated
information system based on a property data base. The system has been very effective in automating a
number of manual infonnation systems. However, we are cunently using only a small portion of the
system’s capabilities. In order to expand our use of the system’s capabilities, we need to obtain
additional training regarding how the data base is structured and how the data screens are formatted.
This will allow us to customize the system to our needs without paying a consultant.
In addition, the City’s applications all run in a network environment. Currently, wc rely on LOGIS to
troubleshoot network problems. Although LOGIS charges a reasonable rate for this service, the costs
do add up. It would be more cost-effective and more timely to have this capability in-house. The
proposed budget includes network training for the I.T. Coordinator to broaden his network
administration capabilities.
Highway 12 Turnback Consultant
The Cities of Long Lake and Orono ar. w orking through a joint task force to develop a plan for the
design of current highway 12 when it is turned back from Mn/DOT to Hennepin County. The turnback
is an opportunity to re-thirik the function and design of the roadway. The task force has detennined that
it needs the assistance of both a transportation planning consultant and a landscape dcsiga'urban
planning consultant. These consultants will first assist the task force in addressing the key issues
c
I
c
1
fi
regarding the design of the roadway, and secondly, will assist the cities in working with Hennepin
County to get as close to the desired design as possible.
Fundins for Street Rehabilitation
In order to balance the 2004 budget within the levy limit, the amount budgeted for street
rehabilitation was reduced from $97,000 to $30,000. The 2005 budget restores $49,500 of this
reduction. This is reflected in the increase in the Infrastructure levy from $35,450 to $85,950. The
City has a number of local roads, that are rot eligible for State funding, that will need to have major
rehabilitation in the coming years. Two examples are Casco Point Road and Orono Orchard Road.
We need to begin to set aside funding for these needs.
MltiB
City of Orono
General Fund Revenues
For 2005
^ venue Source
I'ropcriy Tuifi
Deer & Liquor Licenses
Cigarette Licenses
Commercial Dock Licenses
Septic Licenses
Garbage Hauler Licenses
Dog Licenses
Other Business Licenses
TfilMl RMsIarcs Uernsrs
Building Permits
General Permits
Other Permits
Total Permits
Federal Grant-Emerg. Prep
IIACA Aid/MVC
Local Goveiiunent Aid - LGA
Payroll Aid
Police Training Reimbursement
Police State Aid
PER A State Aid
Stale Grants/Aids • Other
Federal Grant-COPS-Oilwr
MSA • Streets
County Grnnt-Recveling
Aids / Grants from Other Govts
Total Intrrgmrcrnmrntal Revenue
Plan Check & Site Exam Fees
Conditional Use, Variance, A Subdivision
On*Silc Septic Program Fees
c>x'ling Program Fees
infracted Public Works Services
Interdepartmental Services-Public Works
Administrative Charges for Services
General Taxable Sales
Assessment Searches
Building Permit Mail-in Fees
'I otal Gen Govt .Servirc ( Hrgs Rev
Contracted Police Services
Contracted Animal Control Services
Police Special Services
Contracted Inspection Services
false Alarm Fees
Police Kcpttrls
Police Rcscfvc/DARF Program Receipts
Total Public Safety Scrv C hrg Rev
Court fines
Dog Impttund Fees
Total Finei and Forfritv Revenue
Interest on ImcstiTKnts
NOW Interest
Total liivfsimcat Resrnur
Pa>mcnts In Lieu of Taxes
Miscellaneous Revenue
Rent Income
Cuntribufions & Dmulions
Sale of bquipment A taind
Iransfer In
Total Miscrilaneout Revenue
Total Rrvrnurt anil Transfers In
2002
Actual
2,411.043
2003
Amal
2,541.519
6.700
1.200
0
0
685
2.058
L^3
12.146
7.100
1.100
0
0
620
5.858
17.116^
323.204
40/'HI
25.^3
■389,858
375.897
44.140
21.151
441,188
0
63.069
9.283
0
8,909
99.327
7.219
2.0K0
40,715
101.622
17,427
__3,305
35W6“
I79,94.r
53.058
52.483
67.540
2.970
10.674
63.610
3.393
360
3.S5
434 J88
765.783
31,381
55.105
20.918
10.320
1,103
0
884^610
'97.983
1.325
W308
49.336
1.517
50353
6.365
0
0
0
13,889
102.145
7J!I9
3,987
0
95.227
13,698
0
242330
186.157*
53.581
51.794
67.418
954
5 253
72.520
2.745
150
362
"440.9W
794.36 r
32.223
33.162
20.306
11,667
i;»oo
250
893,169
r06.89T
960
I0735I
26.008
834
0
4.648
5.400
0
11,343
0
2IJ9I'
2WM2
9.157
5.400
4.000
470.520
0
489,077
1-
. Mai Expenditures
i e of Fund Balance
Total Revenues Over (I’lidcf) Total Fxprndmirrs
<656353 5,200.226
2004
Dollar Percentage
2004 2005 Increase Increase
thru June Oudsia Budcel (Decrease)(Decreased
0 2.596.820 2,990,470 393.650 15.2%
3.050 4.080 6,000 1.920 47.1%
1,100 1,200 1.200 0 0.0%
0 0
0 0
700 520 650 130 25.0%
648 2,800 4.650 1,850 66.1%
584 2,500 2,500 0 0.0%
6.082 11.100 15.000 3,900 35.1%
119 034 288.000 300.(X)0 li'ooo 4.2%
15,333 52.000 46.000 (6,000)-11.5%
9.295 16.500 20.000 3300 21.2%
143.662 156300 3^,000 9300*2.7H4
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 ••
0 0 0 0 ••
0 0 0 0 —
0 7,000 13.000 6.000 85.7%
0 91.800 102.000 10.200 11.1%
0 7.220 7.000 (220)-3.0%
4.757 0 0 0
780 0 0 0
48.005 100,000 95.000 (5,000).5.0%
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 ••
53342 206.020*2l?.0fl0 10,980 5.3%
69.836*155,000 160.000 5.060*3.2%
30,155 63,000 70.000 7,000 11.1%
0 53.000 52,000 (1.000)-1.9%
29 67.600 67.300 (300)41.4%
455 2.500 1,500 (1,000)-40.0%
0 7.000 5.000 (2.06UI -286%
37.300 74.600 72.500 (2.100)-2.8%
1,652 2,500 2.500 0 0.0%
135 100 100 0 0.0%
154 500 500 0 0.0%
139.716“425300 431,400 5,600 1.3%
2.745"833.000*850.000 17,000 2.6V
11,225 32.890 33.000 110 0.3%
311,091 45.000 35.000 (10,000)-22.2%
7.646 10.000 15,000 .5.000 50.0%
1.750 10.000 10,000 0 0.0%
145 1,500 1.500 0 0.0%
0 0 0 0
334.602"932390 ■944360 12.110 1.3%
7.616 95,0(X)98.420"3,420 3.6%
1.050 _ 1,500 1.000 (500)-33 3%
......8,666 __ 96^500 99,420 2,920 3.0%
0 40.000 30.666 (10,000)-25.0%
105 l.(XK)1.000 0 0.0%
105 41.000 31.000 (10.000)-24.4%
0 l.'300*6 (IJOO)-100.0%
1.324 4.960 5.000 40 0.8%
2.250 5.400 5,400 0 00%
0 0 0 0 ••
0 8.000 9.000 1.000 12.5%
0 0 0 __ 0
3.574 ........ i"9M8 I9,464T (260)-1.3%
689.949 4,685,790
ga.*fCTl,-K,—____5.114,190 428,400
4,701,490
(15.700)
5.114.190
0
' -ji-
..•V>0iWr^P*|i
mm F'w,
F»
o Ci*- *>rOrono
2005 Geneiv^ und Expenditure
Budget Summaiy
2002
AClllAI.
2003
ACIKAL
2004
Budget
2005
Budget
Dollar
Increase
fDccrcasel
%
Increase
(Decrease)
Personal Services 2,765,579 2,755,748 2,973,700 3,162,510 188,810 6.35%
Supplies & Maintenance 470,155 390,430 372.460 396,860 24,400 6.55%
Professional Services 750,366 744,342 803,630 854,940 51,310 6.38%
Insurances 72,340 74,520 78,250 79,790 1,540 1.97%
Other Expenses 293,149 291,962 317,610 379,090 61,480 19.36%
Capital Outlay 83,988 104,177 110,000 116,000 6,000 5.45%
Transfers to Other Funds __J16,065 105^000 45,000 125,000 80,000 177.78%
Total 4,55^642 4,466.180 4,700,650 5,114,190 413,540 8.80%
A-2
m
TueracT -TV., x
■■
&'1f^
L
TAX LEVIF.S
General Fund
General l.evy
General Add Back 60*/o of airls reduction
General Fund - FtRA Rale Increases
General Fund - COPS Grant IX*crea.sc
General Fund - Capital l-iquipment Cert.
Total General Fund Ixvy
CIFYOiNiKONO
TAX LEVIFS
Actual 2004 vs Proposed 2005
Infrastructure (PIR)
Park 1-and Acquisition and Development
Imp & Equip Outlay - Capital Eiquip Cert
1997 Improvement Bond IXbt Service
1999 Improvement liond IXbl Service
2003 Imp Refunding Bond IXbt Service
1998 HRA Refunding Bond Debt Service
2003 Fire Facility and Equipment Bond IXbt Service
Total All Otker Levies
lOTAL TAX I.F.VIFS FOR ALL RJRPOSFii
Total "levy limit"
fnMrAu^rviOM'.IaaMvO' lU
Actual I’roposcd
Proposed 2005
Increase (Decrease)
I rom Actual 2004
2004 2005 _Amount Percent
$2,509,684 (a)
38.216 (a)
5.540
14.790
83,000
$2,990,470
S2,6S1,23U S2.9W.470 $339,240 12.80%
35,450 (a)84.950 49,500 139.63%
5,000 (a)5.000 0 0.00%
125,000 —(125.000) -100.00%
18,000 18,000 0 0.00%
5,000 5,000 0 0.00%
35,000 35,000 0 0.00%
250.000 250,000 0 0.00%
___73,250 73,250 0 _ 0.00%
$546,700 $471,200 ($75,500)-13.81%
$3,197,930 $3,461,670 $263,740 ^ J.25%
2,588^50 (a)_____-0-.
A-3
j • ;
7 _ ,
c c
City of Orono
Tax Capacity, IxKal Levy, & Tax Capacity Rates
■I iM;fcrvMMMAX( xri lit
__ _ JOOS OvcMUndcr) 2004 _ __
TAX CAPACITY
Actual
2m
Estimated
2005 Amount Percent
Real Estate $18,108,033 $19,918,836 $1,810,803 10.00®/.
Personal lYoperty 120,534 132..587 12,053 10.00®/.
Deduct 'lax Increments (60,625)(66,688)(6,063)0.00®/.
Deduct Contrib Fiscal Disp (279,146)(307,061)(27.915)10.00®/.
Add Distributiun Fiscal Disp 219,720 ____ 241,692 21,972 10.00®/.
Net Tax Capacity (To calculate rate)$18,108,516 $19,919,368.... —$1,810,852 10.00®/.
LOCAL LEVY
Total levy all ruiuls $3,1^7,930^$3.461,670 ^ $263,740 _ 8.2_5%
TAX CAPACITY RAULS
Ocncral Revenue 14.624%15.013%0.389®/.2.66®/.
PIR Infrastucturc-Stomi Sewer / Roads 0.196%0.427®/o 0.231®/.117.71®/.
Parks - Land Acquisition & r>cvelopment 0.028%0.02.S®/o .4).003®/.-10.35®/.
Improve & liquip - Capital Fxpiipmcnt 0.690%0.000"/o -0.690“/.—
Debt Service 0.320%0.291®/.-0.029®/.-9.01®/.
lIRA Building Bonds 1.379%1.255®/.-0.124®/.-8.99®/.
I'ire l-acilily & Equipment Bonds Debt 0.404®/.___ 0.368®/.__ _ -0.(D6®/.---- ___
'rotal liocal Fax Capacity Kate ^ 17.641 I7.378®/.-0.263*/.-f.49%
A-4
L L
liIVcct of 2005 Tax Levy & Budget on Homes
Market Valwe foe.2004Jtixes $800,000
* 2004 Tax ('apatiiy (net) *» 1 % t»f first $500,000 market value, plus 1 .25% of all value over $500,000
2005 lax Capacity (net) - I % of first $500,000 market value, plus 1.25% of all value over $500,000
A-5
2004;2m
5% incr
2Q05
10% incr
20M 2iM)§
5% incr
2iKJ5
10% incr
EatiwiMted^lwrkct yjlue %mmi $330,000 $800,000 $840,000 $880J0Q
Tax ('apacity (Net) ♦3.000 3,150 3,300 8,000 8,400 8,800
Tax Capacity Rate 17.641%17.378%17.378%17.641%17.378%17.378%
Net Tax $529.23 $547.41 $573.47 $1,411.28 $1.4.59.75 $1,529.26
$ Increase (Decrease) from 2004 -$18.18 $44.24 $48.47 $117.98
% Increase (IX’crease) from 2001 mm 3.4%8.4%3.4%84%
City o'* ■'••ono
2005 Oper^ g Budget
FUND: (;i:ni :ralkiini )
DEPARTMENT: C ITY COUNCIL
2002
AtaJJAL
2003
ALIUAI.
2004
lUUKJIT
Y-T-I)
06/3(l/2(KH
2(K)5
DI-PI
Rl:OULSr
2(M)5
M(iK
Rl COMMI)
2005
zUM)lltl»
IK)LLAR
INCREASE
%
INCREASE
1DECREASE3
Personal Sciviecs
Other Expenses
19.358
52.005 _
I8.2VI
5M30
19,070
53.080
9.H36
24.277
1'J.670
55.700
19,670
_ 55.700
0
0
0
2.620^
O.OO*#
494*0
TOTAI. CITY COUNCIL 71.363 ^69J21 72,750
..ar-
34.113 75.371)75.370 Jl 2.620 3 60%
:rsLr
l>K«MiRAMI)l S(’KIIMI(»NA:()HJi;rTIVrS: _
I he City Council ovciscc-i ihc politics and procedures that nm ern the til) ill pionioting the healtli, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Orono.
Ori RAMNG COS! ACl IVl I IliS:
liitIudeJ in "Other IXpcnses* arc the costs associated with city-wide organizational memherships including the l.«ke Minnetonka C onscrsatitui Districi.
the league of Minnesota Cities, and Association of McUopulitaii Municipalities. Ihcse organizations provide sers ices that ensure the City's hcsi interests
arc hemg represented at various levels ol govemmcni.
Tersonal Scis ices’ include the wages and employment taxa for City Council Rcprcscniatis cs.
L City o*’ 1M10
2005 Oii«ri<_ Budget
2002
ACniAL
2003
AsrruAL
2004 Y-M)
BUDGEr 0600/2(KM
2(M)5
DIPT
Kiguol
2(H)5
MGR 2005
DOLLAR
FNCRFASE
%
INCREASi:
RLLOMML) ADOP TIB (DHCREASLy (DI CRI:asi:i
FUND: GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
PciTumul Services
Supplies & Maintenance
ProfcssicMial Sciviccs
Othci I Xpcnscs
228.127
3f>0
5.471
10,098
236.642
0
4.085
0,893
249.890
2(K>
4.700
10.950
126.792
0
1,875
6,081
262.530
200
4,700
12.250
262.530
200
8,700
15.350
0
0
0
0
12,640
0
4.000
4,400
5.06%
0.00%
85.11%
40.18%
rolAL ADMINISI KA I ION 244,059 250,620 _ 265,740 134,751 279/)80 ____286.780 21,040 7.92%-•. :-rv-
VHi M iR AM I )l S( RIP 11( )N A (OIJI C ‘ 1 1VI S:
I he Ailtnifiisiiation 1 K*partmciil inciuJes the Ciiy Adininislralor who pro\iiics ihc overall rnanagcmcnl directi(m for ihc city through inlormation and
anal)sis to Uic Council, and response to citi/cn inquiries. In addition, tltc City AdmlnisUalui is responsible for u\ crsccing the human re.simrci function
in a way that enuhlc.s the city to attract and retain well qualified personnel. 13tc Administrative Staff provides support to the City Administraif^r and in
ollici areas.
i )PI R A1 IN( i ( < )S I A( 11\1 1 IKS:
Included in ‘Personal Service.s‘ are the wages and emplo>ment taxes Iim the City Administrator and Administration Stall. A budgeted increase is included
to provide the StaU with a cost of living Increase comparable to the national and kKal average
'Pnifessional Services' includes nionic.s for outside con.sulling on emploxmcnt and wotkplacc compliance issues
-
■'i'■V-u-/'-
L '*onoCity»
2005 OpciV-^g Budget
2005 2005 DOLLAR %
2002 2003 2004 Y-T-D DEPT MGR 2005 INCREASE INCREASE
FUND: GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT: ELECTIONS
ACTUAL ACrUAL BUIX jET 06/30/2004 Rl.OUESr KECOMMD ADOPTED IDECREASE) (DECREASE)
PciT.onal Services 9.574 0 9,420 0 0 0 0 (9.420)-100.00%
Supplies & Maintenance 1.757 0 1,700 512 0 0 0 (1.700)-100.00%
Other Expenses _ 1.856 241 2,090 178 ^0 250 0 (1.840)-88.04%
TOTAL ELECTIONS 13.187 _ 241 _13.210 690 250 250 0 -98.11%
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES:
The Elections Department administers all federal, state, county, and municipal elections held in the city. Temporary elections judges are hired to provide
the necessary staffing at polling locations, and for the operation of voting machines. The Administrative Staff provides supers ision to the election judges
as needed.
OPI RAl ING COST ACl IVITIES:
* Included in 'Personal Services* are the wages for the tcmporar> elections judges.
^ ‘Other Expenses* include the building rental expenses for v ariuus polling locations u ilhin the city.
.'3
vJ.1*' «•
c city r' '^rono
2005 Opei^ .g Budget #
2002
ACIUAL
2003
AiXUAL
2004 Y-T-D
QUDCiFI 06^Q{H
2005 2005 DOLLAR %
DLPT MGR 2005 INCREASE INCREASE
REQUEST RECQMMD ACfiCtEO (DECREASE) (DECREASE)
EUND; GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT: ASSESSING
OthCT Expenses 11 LI 17 II3.W3 _UT.oqo II 5,000 0 (2,000)-1.71%
• •L.II7 _113,903 117,000^9,167 115.000 _ 115,000 _0_____(2,000J -1.71%
PRCXiRAM DliSCRIFlION & OBJIiCTIVliS:___
The City maintains a renewable contract agreement wiili Hennepin County n> provide Assessing scrv ices.
OPERA TING COST A("l IVI rii;S:
• Included in ’Other 1-xpenses ’ ore the costs associated with the cunlruciuul ugreement w ith I Icnncpiii County to prov idc assessing sen ices.
L Cily ^rooo
2005 OpeK^ «ig Budget
2005 2005 IX)I.LAR %
2002 2003 2004 V-T-D DEPT MGR 2005 INCREASE INCREASE
ACIUAL ACTUAL BUDGET Q40Q/2QQ4 REQUEST RECQMMD (DECREASE) (DECREASE)
FUND: GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT: FINANCE
Personal Services 177,799 183,111 191,910 93,896 231,980 231,980 0 40,070 20.88%
Professional Services 4.400 4,581 4,170 0 4,600 4,600 0 430 10.31%
Other Expenses ______\M7_1,809 1,280 __ 260^____ 2,160 4,160 0 ______2,880 225.00%
TOTAL FINANCE I83J46 189.501 J97,3f)0_94,156 238,740 __ 240.740 43,380 21.98%
PROGRAM DHSCRIPTION & OBJtCTI VKS
The Finance Department oversees the Cit/s financial operations, insurances, and emploj^ec benefits. It is responsible for preparing the budget document
and annual report in accordance with generally accepted financial principles. The Cily maintains a nrnewablc contract agreement with a local audit firm
to provide auditing services.
OPERATING COST ACTIVmES:
Included in Tcrsonal Scr\ ices* arc the wages and employment ta.\es fur the Finance Department Staff. A budgeted increase is included to provide
Staff with a cost of living increase comparable to the national and lixral average.
Trofcssional Scr\ tees' includes a portion of the costs associated with the contractual agreement with the auditors to provide audit services.
X>ther Expenses' includes training and development, and memberships in professional organizations for the Finance Staff
C
FUND: GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT: LEGAL
2002
ACTUAL
• ; •
i*'
y^'w
City ^rono
2005 Opel g Budget
2003
AdliAL
2004
BUDGET
Y-T-D
06GQ/2004
2005
DEPT
REQUEST
2005
NfGR
RECOMMD
DOLLAR %
2005 INCREASE fNCREASE
ADOPTED (DECREASE) IDECREASEl
Professional Services 69,005
TO!AL LEGAL 69,005
85,846
85,846
81,000
81,000
26,663
26,663
81,000
81,000
8L0(K)
81,000
0
0
0
0
0.00%
0.00%
PROGRAM DESCRIP nON & OBJECTIVES:
The City maintains a renewable contract agreement with a local legal firm to provide all legal services. The Legal Department provides professional
representation and opinion on city sert iccs and operations. l.egal Department expenditures include cooperative agreements with local governments
ill surrounding communities to share resources for the confinement and prosecution of individuals suspected or charged of/with wrongdoing.
OPERATING COST AC'l IVITIES:
• Included in 'Professional Scniccs* arc the costs associated with the contractual agreement w ith the legal staff, the City's share of prosecution charges,
and the City's share of jail charges.
C City f*'*^rono
2005 Opciy^ .g Budget
2005 2005 DOLI.AR •/.
2002 2003 2004 Y-T-D DEPT MGR 2005 INCREASli INCREASE
ACTUAL ACTUAL aUCQET 06/30/2004 REQUEST RECOMMD ADOPTED (DRCRKASEl (DECREASE!
GENERAL FUND
RTMENT: CENTRAL SERVICES
Supplies & Maintenance 80,158 82,397 69,100 31,647 86,200 87,600 0 I8,5(K)26,77%
Professional Services 13,656 14,417 13,290 4,742 14,700 14,700 0 1,410 10.61*/.
Insurance 44.950 46,310 48,630 24,315 50,120 50,120 0 1,490 3.06%
Other Expenses 69,374 80,365 77.060 40.60(1 79,260 79.260 0 2,200 2.85%
Capital Outlay & Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 _____0_0 0 N/A
TO IALCI N I RAL SI KVICi:S 208,138 __ 223.4HO ___ 208,080 101,310 230,280 231,680 0 23,600 11.34%
PROGRAM DRSCRIPTION & OBiRCTIVES:
ITic Ccntrul Services Deparlmenl provides fur those operating exf^-** e.s that encompass all city departments. By consolidating these expenditures, the city
can more accurately determine the cneclivcncss of the costs and benefits provided. I he City maintains a renewable contract agicement vsitli an outside
janitorial service for gcnciu! cleaning and upkeep of city facilities. I he Central Sen ices Department also pays for a portion of the costs associated
with the annual audit.
OPI RATIN(iCnST A(‘HVIHhS:
Included in 'Supplies & Maintenance' and 'Other Ilxpcnses’ arc the operating supplies and charges, and maintenance expenses On city equipment and facilities.
• 'Insurance* expense includes a portion of the Cii/s general and liability insurance costs.
L ¥lb,
-m.
::i • - •
c City' ''rono
2005 Opel jg Budget
2(K)2
AdUAL
2003
ACTUAL
2004
BUDGET
Y-T-D
06GO/20 04
2005 2005 DOLLAR %
Di;i»r MGR 2005 INCREASE INCREASE
aEOUESI RECQMMD ADOCEED (DECREASE) (DECREASE)
FUND: GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT: HUMAN SERVICES
Other Expenses
TOTAL HUMAN SERVICES
16,430 J6,90^__18.010 _8.290 18.600 18.600 0 590 3.28%
!^43(L l_6,900__I8.0J0 _8,290 18.600 18,600 _0 _590 3.28%
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES:
The Human Services Department is eomprised ol several area organl7ations that provide equal opportunity in employment, housing, public sen ices, and education.
The City maintains an afTiliatinn with these organizations to ensure a strong reiationship with area communities and their citizens
OPERAITNG CO^T ACT! Vgil^:______
* Included in 'Other Expenses' ore the contributions made to i luman Sen ice Organizations in the Orono area.
L City o' “ono
2005 Opci^^ . .g Budget
2005 2005 DOLLAR %
2002 2003 2004 Y-T-I)Di;PT MGR 2005 INCRLASE INCRKASL
ACTUAL ACTUAL WHQM Q^30'2 oo4 RHOUESl RECONIMD ADOFfED LD£CREASL) (DLCREASLl
i; GENERAL FUND
RTMENT: POLICE
Personal Services 1,491,480 1.-192.721 1,635,690 737.840 1,679,240 1,741,730 0 106,040 6.48%
Supplies 8i Maintenance 171,467 158,076 139,260 51,158 153,100 152.160 0 12,900 9.26%
Professional Services 41,831 53.471 55,020 34,086 56.140 57,640 0 2,620 4.76%
Insurance 27,.190 28.210 29.620 14,810 29,670 29.670 0 50 0.17%
Other Expenses 60,976 71.599 78,590 29,153 76,720 82,720 0 4,130 5.26%
Capital Outlay 83,9^104.177 1 10,(KK). _73,207 I12,(MH)116.000 0 6,000 5.45%
TOTAL POLICE 1,877,132 1,908,254---- ---2.048.180 940.254 2.106,870 2,179,920 0 I3L740 6.43%
PROGRAM nnsCRimON Sl OnJLCTI vi:s:
The Police Department prc»vides for ihc public safely within Orono and sc\ cral surrounding cominurulics. I his is acct>mplishcd through preventive patrol,
traHic enforcement, education, criminal investigation and prosecution. Through renewable contract agrcentcnls. the city pro\ ides police sen ices to the
communities of Spring Park, Umg Lake, and Minnetonka Heach. Due to the nature of these cooperative agreements, the Police Department operates, and
is budgeted for as a ‘cost center'. This enables the C ity to accurately determine the portion of operating costs that pertain to each contract city.
UPtRA IING COS r ACTIVI TILS:
• Included in 'Personal Scr\ ices' arc the wages and cmphninenl taxes for the Police Department Staff A budgeted increase is included Co prov idc
StafT with a cost of living increase cumpaiabic to (he national and local a\eiagc.
♦ 'Supplies & Maintenance' and 'Other l-xpenscs' includes operating supplies and charges, and maintenance expenses on police equipment and facilities.
'Insurance' expense includes a portion of the City's general and liability insurance costs.
tj/au
. V.‘. I
!'.r -'i '• •■.'■
L City r" "^rono
2005 Ope«^_ ig Budget
2002
ACIUAL
2003
ACTUAL
2004
BUDGET
Y-T-D
06/30/2004
2005
DEPT
2005
MGR
REQUEST B£CQMMD
DOLLAR %
2005 INCRrj\SE INCREASE
ADQfTEP CD.ECREASE1 LDELREASE)
FUND: GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT: FIRE
Supplies & Maintenance 0 0 0 2.734 0 0 0
Profcssinnal Services _ 329,172 314.884 380.000 176.807 431.000 420,000 0 40,000 10.53%
rOIALFlRE 329,172 314,884 _380,000 176.807 431.000 420.000 0 lOiPOO 10.53%
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AODJECTIVIiS:
The Fire Dcpartmeiil is comprised of renewable contract agreements with the surrounding communities of Long Lake. Excelsior, and
Way/iUa. lor fire suppression services.
OPERATING COST ACTIVJTIL;S^: _________
^ Included in 'Professional Scrv ices' Ore the costs associated with the contract agreements w ith surrounding communities.
mmm ■■
V-. -• ..>■',.“A
■M':¥r'.'' =*^1* ^j !'
m -
. . •/ •: ‘
"**»•-■' u' . V . .
<*■■■,■ r ■*'«¥'■ ;-r"
L City ^ ^rono
2005 Opek^ jg Budget
2005 2005 DOLLAR %
2002 2(K)3 2004 V-T-D DEPT MGR 2005 INCREASE INCREASE
ACJUAL ACTUAI. BUDGET 06f3onm REQUEST RECOMMD ADOPTED (DECREASE) (DECREASE)
i: GENERAL FUND
RTMENT: PLANNING & ZONING
Personal Sen'ices 443.773 466,660 490,960 235,059 500,960 511,350 0 20,390 4.15%
Supplies & Maintenance 2,623 6,514 4,700 266 4,500 4,500 0 (200)-4.26%
Professional Services 6,431 3,296 5,000 1,960 5,000 5,000 0 0 0.00%
Other Expenses 7,511 5,497 7,300 _____l,9j;5 8,450 8,450 0 l,IS0 I5J5%
TOTAI. PLANNING & ZONING 460,338■’."isssrr ■481,967 507,960 _ 239^0 ____5JL8,9I0 _ 529,300 0 21,340 4.20%
PRCKiRAM Di:SCRIPHON & OBJI-CTIVES*
The Planning & Zoning Departmem oversees (he development and redevelopment vvitinn the City in accordance with established polici«:s and guidelines.
The policies and guidelines have been created md arc cnlorced to maintain the health, safety, and w elf are of the public, and the aesthetics of the community.
OPERATING COST ACnVITIES:
^ Included in ’Personal Serv ices' ate the wages and emplo) ment taxes for the Planning & Zoning Department StaiT. A budgetc^d increase is included to provide
Staf f w ith a cost of living increase comparable to the national and local average.
• 'Other Expenses' includes training and dc\ elopmenl, and memberships in professional organizations for tlie Planning &, Zoning Siafl*.
c City ' * ''rono
2005 Ope^^ jg Budget
2002
ACCUAL
2003
ACTUAL
2004
BliIXfEl
Y-T-D
06/30/2004
2005
DHPT
knoiJRST
2005
MGR
RECOMMD
DOLLAR %
2005 INCREASE INCREASE
ADOPTED fDECREASEI (DECREASE)
FUND: GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT: ENGINEERING
Professional Service
TOTAL ENGINEERING
23^59 _10,557 10.570 5j9l0 _ 11.300 11,300 0 730 6.91%
23,659 10,557 ...10.570 11.300 11,3(H)0 730 6.91%
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES;
The City mainuins a renewable conlracl with a local firm to provide all engineering services. The Engineering Depanment provides professional rcprcsentalion
and opinion on city services and operations.
OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES:
* Included in 'Prorcssional Services' arc the costs associated with the contract agreement with the engineering rum
Kcr:l L_.
. 'A
c city r'‘'^rono
2005 Ope^^ 4g Budget
2005 2005 DOLLAR %
2002 2003 20C4 YT-D DEPT MGR 2005 INCREASE INCREASE
h GENERAL FUND
RTMENT: STREET MAINTENANCE
AOUAL ACTUAL BUIXiET 06/30/2004 RtOUEST KbCCMMD ADOPTED (DECREASE!(DECREASE!
Personal Service 314,487 283,516 329,990 137,620 330,«8()344,200 0 14,210 4.31%
Supplies & Maintenance 180,728 115,916 126,000 40.286 153,600 122,600 0 (3.400)-2.70%
Other Profcsional Services 0 165 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
Other Expenses __ _25,4^_ 25.278 29,500_ 11,142 29,650 29,150 0 (350)-1.19%
TO l Al. STREin MAIN l ENANCE _ 520,680 424.875 485,490 189,048 ___514,130 495,950 ___Ct 10.460 2.15®/^
PROGRAM DKSCRIPI ION & OBJIXmVHS:
The Street L>et>artment provides for the muintainancc of uli city staxMs (o ertsure a safe and driveable condition. Standard maintenance includes seal coating,
patching, snow plowing, and sweeping. Due to its excess storage capacity, the City maintains coopaalivc agrcemenls with surrounding communities tor the
stor e and sale of salt’sand supplies
OPKRATING COST ACniVII lES:
Included in Personal Serv ices' are the wages and cmplo>Tnent taxes for the Street Department Staff. A budgeted increase is included to prov idc
Staff with a cost of living increase comparable to the national and local average.
'Supplies & Maintenance' include general operating supplies for street repair / maintenance, «td vehicle aid equipment raainlcnance.
'Other Expenses' include co.sts to maintain adequate street lighting, and to provide for large scale snow disposal as needed.*■
i
^ I
^ . 'f -
" # ■
%
ISM
C Cilyr 'rono
2005 Opel «g Budget
MIND: Gl> NK RAL hVSU
DEPAR1MENT: PARKS
2002
AOLIAL
2003
ACIUAL
2004
liiJUiitl
Y-r-D
2005
RtQLUiSl
2005
MGR
RECOmjD
2005
ADOPTED
DOLLAR %
INCREASE INCREASE
(DECREASt) (DtCREASE)
Personal Scrv ices
Supplies & Maintenance
Pnifcssional Services
Other Expenses
31,318
33.062
2,768
__ 7,n2
44,084
27,522
7,845
24,020
30,500
2,000
7.250
11.965
6.6K4
3,915
1,239
18,230
10.100
2,000
7,950
23,960
29,800
2.000
7,950
0
0
0
0
(60)
(700)
0
700
.0.25%
•2.30%
0.00%
‘>.66%
1OTAL PARKS & RHCRLATION „ 94.310 81,.160 63,770 23,803 58,480 63,710 p (60)_____j4U>9%
mXiKAM DI SCKIPI ION & OHJI-CriVI-S:
I he Parks & Kccrcation Dcparlmcnt provides lor the mamtaimincc of the City ’s parks In addition, the city participates in a joint recreation program with area
urganizatiuns to ensure a community-wide eflurt in providing adequate rceiealional lacililies.
()pi RAI INCi (<)s I AC' I IVI nr:s:
Included in 'Personal Services' arc the wages and employment taxes lor the Parks K Recreation Department Staf !. A budgeted increase is included to provide
Stall w ith a cost of living increase comparable to the national and local average.
'Supi lies & Maintenance' includes the operating supplies and maintenance for all park facilities.
XHher Expenses* includes the costs associated w uh the C ity's participation in the Joint Recreation Program, and miscdlaiicuus equipment rental.
'Ii%;3
V
•V-
c I City 'rono
2005 OpcK. .ag Budget
2005 2005 DOLLAR %
2002 2003 2004 Y-T-D DEPr MGR 2005 INCRI-A.SK INCREASE
ACTUAL ACIIIAL BUIKiET 06/30/2004 l<miiJMMD ADOPTED lDIiCR£ASEJ tPECRLASE)
FUND: GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT; REC:YCLING
Personal Services 0 2,675 0 U 2,300 2,300 0 2,300 N/A
Supplies & Maintenance 0 5 1,000 0 0 0 0 (1.000)-lOO.OO^i
Professional Services »2,129 76,910 86,880 39,109 86,000 0 (880)-1.01%
Ollier Expenses ____y 04 ___908 2,500 3,367 2,500 2,5(^j_0 0 0.00*/i
101 AL RECYCLING 84,633 8(),49X 90.3H0_42.476 ‘>0^800 90,81)0 9 420 0.46%
PROGRAM Dl-SCRJP I ION & OBJLCI IVES:
The city participates in a joint rcc>x*lin£ program with area c«)mmunilics to prm idc cui hsidc recycling service. In addition, the city also provides spring
and/or full cleanup da)s for residents who have materials unsuitable lur curbside rec>cling pickup.
1
Ol'I-RA UNO cos t ACnVn iliS;
• Included in 'Personal Scr\ ices\ and 'Other I Apenses' arc the overtime wages for City Stall whom participate in the spring and/or fall cleanup, and
for the disposal of additional materials collected during the cleanup.
♦ 'Professional Services* includes the costs associated with the Joint Recycling Program
1
a - iiwmirttt
\i
■ y--- ^ -
. . ; ■,; > :
^ V'ii
L City f' ''rono
2005 Opc.^ ig Budget
2002
ACTUAL
2003
ACTUAL
2004
DUDGtr
YT-D
06/300004
2005 2005 IX)LLAR %
DK»T MGR 2005 INCREASE INCREASE
ECQUI^ RECOMMD ADOPTED (DECREASE) (DECREASE)
PUND: GENERAL EUND
DEPARTMENT: SPECUL SERVICES
Personal Services 29,663 28,048 22.150 5,339 27,790 24,790 0 2,640 11.92%
F*rofcssional Services 60,672 60,318 44,000 25,155 52,000 49,000 0 5,000 11.36%
Other Expenses 0 0 0 0 0_0 0 0 N/A
rOTAL SPECIAL SERVICES _90.335 88,366 66.150 30.494 79,790 73,790 0 7,640 11.55%
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJIXl IVES;
The Special Services Department provides a separate 'cost center* for trucking city-provided consulting und Police special service detail. Orono residents who
apply for land use variations arc subject to be billed for any additional stall, legal, and engineering time that is spent review ing their application. These charges
are recorded in this departmental budget, and the applicants ate subsevjuently billed fur this additional time. The rev enucs rccciv ed offset the auJitional
charges incurred. Orono businesses or residents who wish to contract with the city for Police security or traff.c control arc billed for their time. The City ’s costs
are recorded in (his departmental budget, aiul are offset by (he revenues received from the requesting parties.
OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES (Reintbursed):
• *Pci unal Services' include Police OlTiccr overtime WTtges for security work and/or iralTic control.
• 'Professional Serv ices' include legal and engineering review expense for land use applications.
\ .I
J'i^. *f.4 ‘ii»‘ **' ‘ K.i.: ,
i^x i !t’:-^'^:yy:‘^'-:i<:. : V-:■■••••>■ ^T- -■ ' •■ .‘f ^
Kisi
..........................»;i*.’>^
■'■Ji
. t -
e City ‘roBo
2005 Opei^. .ig Budget
2002 2m 2004 Y-T-D
2005
Dl PT
2005
MGR 2005
DOLLAR
INCREASE
%
INCRl-ASE
ACQIAL ACIUAL BUDOEI 06/30/2001 REOUEST RECOMMD ADOPTED (DECREASE)(DECREASE)
>: GENERAL FU.ND
RTMENT: SPECIAL PROJECTS A CONTINGENCIES
Personal Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
Professional Services 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
Olher Expenses 475 525 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
Transfers 116.065 105.000 45,000 0 145,000 125,000 0 80,000 177.78%
Contingency Items _37.586 19,672 30.000 5,658 40,000 75.000 ____0 45.000 150.00%
TOTAL SPECIAL PROJECIS AND CONT. ^-
_ I54j238 m.l97 _____75,000 5.658 _ I85JKK)200,000 125,000 166 67%
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECH VE^ _
TTic Special Projects & Contingencies Department includes funds allocated for planned projects or events that heneni the entire city, and for any iinforsccn
riicumslanccs that produces additional openses. This department also provides for an operatii.3 transfer to the Equipment Outlay Fund to maintain
continual funding for the replacement of equipment and vehicles.
OPI-RA riNG COST ACTlVjj IMS:
* Special projects as assigned.
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 4,551,642 4.466,180 4,700,650 2,062,829 5,035.20(» 5,114,190 413.540 8.80%
CITY OF ORONO
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
Notice is hereby given that the Orono City Council will meet in a work session at 5:30 p.m. on
Tuesday, August 3,2004, in the Orono City Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono,
Minnesota. The purpose of the work session is to review the proposed budget for 2005, and to
discuss other issues of current interest.
This meeting is open to the public.
/ /
Lin Vee, City Clerk
Posted at:
City Hall
Navarre Post Office
Long Lake Post Office
Crystal Bay Post Office