Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-15-1992 Planning Packetmmmwm Ri ia'•,;:-:«l «1 r* mm ii®| v.,::,7:;r^^;:-';-.v::.v*;- Mil IfeM fittHil fe'--■' ’'''-a ■V ♦ vi rai/‘■ :.r =.y j^ i««Pi ”i: f^TASHUiG OOMHISSIOH MEETING Momuirr JUNE 15, 1992, 7; 00 P"^. 1275 BROIW »QW> SOOTH - C30DNCEL Si COUNCIL RBPSBSENT2kTIVB - Mary ButlCfr f ATTENDANCE :-?lr ^S« ^liKi x:i:o •ULED PUBLIC HEARING 1. 7:00 p.m. #1743 Albert Hanser, 1685 Fox Street Preliminary Subdivision ■P': sjjs-a«p lULED PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING vliA;:^:'1-^ ■ ' m liii 2. 8:00 p.m. i?limm’::m #1738 Orono Area Sports Facility, Inc., 2675 Sixth Avenue North - Sketch Plan Review for Proposed Subdivision and Conditional Use Permit li ACTIOH ITEMS - Review of these items will cotoMnce scheduled public hearings. . *PP““»^e/frthe ^i^i the chambers when their application is announced by the Chairman. V .*, #1739 Albin J. Nelson, 500 Oxford Road - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing #1740 Steven M. Harris, 3850 Watertown Read - Renewal Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing V.'* 5. #1741 mmm Rodney J. and Shanon K. Batslaff. 1115 Brown Road S. - Variance - Public Hearing 'mmm ■Mmm #1742 James and Amy Laing, 500 Crono Orchard Road Variance - Public Hearing m.^aSi;ysim:m ■>7l'mm #1744 Donald Helgager, 3265 Sixth Aveiiuo North - Variance ~ Public Hearing U.> •til iffl #1745 °?!i!n!'22-U?-23 “”o02!>"-'v«-iances - Public Hearing m Charles Cudd Company, 2110 Sugaivooi Drive, request to revise driveway alignment m planning commission c 10. Im Reoort by Planning Commission Representatit^e to Council Meeting of June 8, 1992 (Stephen Peterson). i I- Wm Status Report by Lake Use Committee Representatives. Status Report by Facilities Committee Representatives! 13. Other issues ■"i "■ -i 'y: :■> J • :' . ! f.- •'<j aring SiW t to Ip im Nfek;,;. t * ■! p»iiff|M :'\- •'.V-V-SVV- 18Si?ii K»p« lUDDXtIOHAL ITEMS 14. Planning Commission approval of minutes of May 18, meeting. 15. Planning Commission to select a representative t wm ':■ ■ V ;;, .’ '*-r-i the July 13, 1992 Council Meeting. >I«K mmm. ■ Q‘'-:m7' mp ' - ]ym:;’wmm : -a'.. J mm 'ii ■ ;v fe.;'-':Hi ' v'sN' r, ■■•^3 ip WS^rpwi'p^'-■■■ K'^.i^'-,' >V'--4Si!^„'' ' ■■ ■ ■ ■ 2:^ ::''':.*■pMmsMm 7-Py‘Wlk.uP liW« v;io>: "fi mm W ■ ■>.; . '•■■■• . ■ Wm^'^iMUP 2:i £: :^. 2;;; -■ 'P----':''PP:: '-MrP'iPr »:rX.. : -:1> : ‘i-; " ' ''" *’ '"' ~ " pi»®»S3's»gg|fc* mmiwmmm t- r,-' * /'SM jp.;:pp r va:^ v;: ;v:\^ p m»smm jipjK lssiipiii#fflKi«is«ii wm ei Wm^m<mwWpp0^ ■"** yZm BPmlM mimppppmmpi-mrnmypMyMmmpm •• v./.r-v' '.:ji\ ■\Pr- v'; ■ ^.•>f/‘ fcv -'P'^ zp^PPWm m::l ‘wiy'PlP lliSiSJiSSfew^^j Biii i. V ' ' V. ‘ • ^> . v-;- -^ P:i;yyH<^4 . tP'P'P--. > '.i-i-;i ;l«v s43»'«iiisp ■■Oi ''-p.r- :: ■ -I : . *fcsa ;•: „• - '..•. .J- . . V * .‘ PMm . t pppmm^pmpm R ls:ips-s(i|iiiiil^ w zzPr!;^mPyiippfZ:P;p^'Pz^^^^hfm-^PmppPmpzz:P:A^^ >;. . ': ■' 5^ PPzPmzPPPPT^ Ppmppmmimpmmip f ■- ” ■ 2 ■ ^ "1■ A-m- . 'rlPPPilfe'^*i^AppmpmmppAMApypppzptzmp-^^^ ::^Pv:r fm¥psass psiiaip.' V:>: •>'•■•>. ; :a-;w i:*PA:--- '. •■; :. .:'■ •!■•• •■ r mpmp' m ^ppAPpp:PAP(A^:ppy:P m^i:pppp:\:'pppp:p:p^mippyyy yppzA-mm^'y aaavf . a ■••!;•.-va pai:yy’-x:-zimiM mm^ • ‘ymsyik m^':M m ‘A i'-- • » .:. •• :.'t.r V' . . •>K1mm • . -^ vV ’ mm:^:I'liliis ip«illiilii ••=■■’"■• : .-’- \>-v'=v /■"- A- ?■ • •. . .: .r'.- ■ iiV-:.;' ;,.v.r . .='ii:; P,#?v --v-i Planning Cci?jnT mA . ' " Council mm i Hil ilH mmm t PUBLIC ATTENDANCE •••^ CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS.,. J /v. r.L ' NAME (please print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1. A|fel«U A/£T/LXof^* \Mi jyu'i UU- ii V '^4^- Soo OyFO/gp ^i)0K6iX.i A. 3. AMk 4. DA^ /r-L V"IV h^t'v 1 CI'.r/:/,^ f ^AfMA ^ -TAK- ' ^'i / •------- nyoo Lt- \)Jtu UA^/! Jc /f~ a /7V7 9/j ///S' 60iCt ^ ^ jC c AT^ iJiA ’L / ^ ^ 77^/ VA/l//fM:i^. r 1^ il.------J5 5 13.*5^ *’.■ ' 19. f« 20. agenda) ■.a ■h Z i ■ gr • •■•!■•' t.'* '. ■'' -fr'.-'„’«-V m >■■': • : J‘ fciiiaiim Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator June 8, 1992 #1743 Albert Hanser, 1685 Fox Street - Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-IB, Rural residential, 2 acre minimum Total Area = 29.14 acres exclusive of road right-of-way (15.76 wet, 13.38 dry) Loti 1 7*3 acros (4.02 dry^ 3.28 w©t) Lot 2 « 10.43 acres (4.8 dry, 5.63 wet) Lot 3 = 12.10 acres (5.25 dry, 6.85 wet) Pertinent Ordinances (All ordinances reviewed under Application #1721, 5-lot plat) Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B). RR-IB Rural Residential Lot Standards. 2. it Section 10.56, Shoreland Regulations. A. PS« 5S'#!>;«2 *aiH Recreational Development Lake - Tanager Lake. Structural setback *=* 100' Septic setback » 75* Setback from wetland. Browns Bay watershed (Section 10.55, Subdivision 8) Structural setback = 26' Septic setback = 75' Chapter 11, Subdivision Regulations. List of Exhibits t;pAr^:P:PP.P mm mn A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map ^ j r 1 \D-.X-4 - Hardcover Fact Sheets (Proposed Lot l) E - Hardcover Map P - DNR Letter 4/23/92 G - Revised Preliminary Plan Review of Current Application. Applicant has resubmitted a subdivision of a 3“lot plat. Proposed Lot 1 remains the same as in the original 5-lot All original hardcover calculations submitted are valid for current review (Review Exhibits D-1-4 and E). exceeds the lot standards of the RR-IB zoning district an Shoreland Regulations. Previous septic testing remains valid for .^1 A * > «■ .-‘iV ?; i® : ,v 111" • Pill mi Mi F*-Ti t ' ■J’ ■’ i r • f' - C ■r Zoning Pile #1743 June 8, 1992 Page 2 the proposed 3—lot subdivision* The City still has concern that septic test sites be protected prior to developement of Lots 2 and 3. The City must receive written confirmation that there is adequate area to serve guest house use as it is still the intention of the applicant to maintain guest house. The Planning Commission may decide that septic test confirmation* can be provided at the time of a conditional use permit review. The original review by the Park Commission will remain still in effect. The decision of the Park Commission at their March 2nd meeting was to obtain cash in lieu of land. The current 3-lot application involves a request to use a ^jfiveway to serve Lots 2 and 3 rather than being required to install a private road. The access off the driveway serving Lot 1 is a secondary access facilitating access to tennis court and detached garage structure. In consideration of the DNR's review comments for the 5-lot plat (review Exhibit F) and the preliminary comments of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed^ Districtf staff will ask for detailed road plans for private drive if the City approves applicant's requests for a driveway versus a private road installation. * As of this writing, the City has not received applicant's request to use drive rather than private road. Some of the findings noted by applicant's consultant at an earlier meeting are as follows: mA 1. Minimize impact on sensitive area. Based on proposed house locations, single driveways minimize visual impact on adjacent residence on Fox Street. Secondary access off driveway serving Lot 1 is a secondary or accessory access where majority of visitors to property use principal access drive located to west side of property. Staff RecooBiaiidatioii m L- To recommend approval of the 3—lot plat subdivision application of Albert Hanser for the property located at 1685 Fox Street finding all standards of the RR-IB, Shoreland Regulations and On-Site Septic Code have been satisfied. This approval is subject to the following conditions: m1.Applicant Street. to dedicate 33* of right-of-way for Fox li> V. ■, ;::v . .-n*; i>'A ^0': ■u,?. fa# wmi m ^imm m» m-.: h'-'<y-::y;\-}^^' y\'''^- 7-' V - •”S\^‘.y^‘^'■'-’V;' d wmm^:,y 'W 1^1 ^ ^I5T2 &^ferfiw:4aliiwiiaiw^mmmmmmm^MCi!mmm.mmmrnm»f W'MM ii®f i'? ppfw jI ii«y Wte feB:'-;: 7 . •-:‘-B- iSBBBK bi I ::: -v.A"mm Wm P ■ isWjWSftv-:: •:y4';.!i 743 Licant to grant Flowage and Conservation Eaaement • all designated wetlands within the plat. Wetlands :he north and east of the property to be designated he 932.3 elevation. This shall also include area ,ned as low wooded area within proposed Lot 2. tic test sites within Lots 2 and 3 shall be staked or to required land alterations for road and .nage improvements . ucture located within Lot 2 close to west lot l^je 11 be removed prior to final plat approval. On-site tic Manager shall be advised of time of removal to ire there is no damage done to the septic test site Lot 2. licant shall file a separate conditional use guest house use as structure will continue to be a for non-rental residential use. following improvements or structures are recognized non-conforming based on either their substandard back to the shore of Tanager Lake ^ ignated wetland. All structural repairs to these -conforming structures shall require approval of the y of Orono. The non-conforming structures are as lows: Guest house on Lot 1. Detached garage on Lot 1. Tennis court on Lot 1. ed on the Planning Commission's resolve of the :ess issue, the City will accept the °f^ ms submitted for private road construction ^ at or if a driveway is to be permitted, the City wil : for plans for the driveway to ensure positive linage is maintained per DNR and M^WD standards The tv Enqineer will be asked to review and approve the Lveway plans prior to installation of road to ensure tdllines are satisfied. Applicant's J^^^ultant has ked for a refund of the private road th 5-lot plat. The City will wait gineer has completed his review of the 3-lot plat fore a refund is determined. 4’4if-v: v. ■ - ' 1 •jBJ : • -i 4 •• . nii :C>mm « 1^ M liiit LV^ l^-;->. vr •: ,»»/ i^. • •-CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION » ^ i}— - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - -flijfeSir-c-w—7“* / .■»’ =-^“.; •*. - . -. ■m. PROP^TY LOCATION Site Address /^^S‘ ffA^€T Property Identification Nxunber (P.I.D.) Please check one - Property >C abstract or Attach legal description to application. ^ ± § '“X'S-S' torrens? ^0£>0 APPLICANT ' ■-»- • Phone (home) Name A Phone (work) il'-T Address: /<T<P5‘ A"^X ’■OWNER (if different than applicant)* Name - € City t £c/Jr7AtA Phone (home ) Zip; SsS^t m % Phone (work)V'.’, Address:City;Zip; Liir U! dR&IQ‘‘ (attach list if more than one) ,uFFl'"'^ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size JS, 7 6 30. OZ Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels 01 6£V 40^- C'rVim li 400.fiLLUPr-THA^K XpLmjolo cool Roi n /ii:/'v»-*/ % Present Use (check)X Residential; no. of units Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ / Present Zoning District A/C^/S Nuinber of Building Sites; Division for Tax Purposes i ^ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) X Subdivision for New Building Sites / 2 T Proposed Gross Density; Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Existing Units New Units Total Units Units perAcres - - - frAfcr ^7j^Z0 Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land X Residential Other (specify) ■j- . msw ■'1 ■-’/fvu *liP '• *' .m' :•» c l rr ' K' * 4INIMDM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Completed Application Form •• Preliminary Plat informar.ion on Certificate of Survey, 3. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain i;/, this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center * 348-3271). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 1. [fW. . rertification by Zoning Departm€‘.nt that Preliminary Plat Application is :omplete. oning Official's Signature_ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date ' ** ** •• •• •• •• •• mm mm m^mm mm mm mm mm mm mm- tm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm ^m mm mm mm mm mmm mm mm mm mm ^m ^m ^m ^m __ , _ . Payment of fees (park fees,, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). . Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. . Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. ertification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete, oning Official's Signature _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ Date BBS M Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & ill) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement « * ■* Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) Final Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) $150.00 250.00 250.00 300.00 + 20.00/Lot 150.00* le applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or squested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, .anning Commission and Council necessary to ^process this application and '.rther agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Date Date .r-22- plicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the anning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the ird Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled view meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, if an applicant is able to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an thorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building fi Zoning fice of this change prior to the meeting. V TaFrl'. i-fr^^ai _ ^ . n m iil iii ill i^ 'm //y • m mim m Mtmmrnfj B«f mtmmmmmmi K '-'';. wm 11 Pinp- :mmm ^r:; ;-vj mmiiaaiKaie^ •^-:v^^:^^:^p||M■|^■R^ "', i:: .fc ..S:::'AailBili^iSsia0m^'A-.V.;Va-:;-^a '^^SKiii»-Ansj ml ^jfevaci w« im wm *Kta iJA? «W -fe:>1f-:::V ; i, Wm life:-' . "'^1■^ifeaaAaaa P^jSF'--?.'-:'-h-;;:;A=^ niira ■ ' ■■‘A :•• ‘‘lyVWr% ^S1 wm rCvfe e m :000m mmm mh!*^:hu ^ -a:s;v:;^ •: ' ^ = .a k 00i0MiLi:.- .::J ii IlKi'm0:0^00 iiiifmimfe:ii Mi -'mg mmmm^ mmmww ■' :^1 00^mm l?S;‘-il m m m00 mmBm ■00 i^il 0M u- 7-9Z •i. Bl^SitpVJJp « . * • ’y'f • . # • • jp^r.:' *^*' '--.j -'4 0- > ■' ^ J ' > • »V ^<?7- /^/iAJf<^/i HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET ^_ _ _ SETBACK zm'E: (ciRC'-E ONE) 0-75' 75-250' Qspjgo^ 500-1000 Existing H ardcover in Zone m&m »ii A. ■ H ouse /Z5 0 S.F. LENGTH WIDTH • • • • S.F. "rV.-: • ;VV S.F. .k^S.F. S.F. * ■ » %• • »,• B. G arage ____^30 S.F. c. Driveway ssz o S.F. :>A. 3 SO o S.F. mmm.D.. Sidewalk i S.F. S.F. E' E. Patio / Jeck S.F. S.F. t Z:.t V •F. Landscape areas UNDERLAIN BY ■ .. . i '- S.F. •.:H fe; v';^ S.F. PLASTIC -------------- SHEETING 0f * •« . r S.F. : ^«Sa!p«V >1 fe%,n r^A^UtT COiAKT G. Other __ S.F. S9.S s 70 9Z S.F. k Total H ardcover in Zone /7. S.F. ’y Total Property A rea m Zone /z 99Z ' [T] X100 •/<. f9 • • ^J/. /OO t S.F. Ll ‘Y ‘ ■■ % 4 .*• * -.'J ■;j« »» - »* • •• 0^ »*%r .<■ w • • •♦• 1 • ••• 7- wm WMimmmrnmte* P?B<v:/f| Hliii fcl m-^wi :v •:= . ^ :•■•: v:-? V,: .:.: . :•] iimm P^SHi [• ; ■■ mM mmm f‘m mm m ^ i;% m ^ ;>5^; "v * ^-■. ;^^SHH| B wIb JE rnm&mm-mi P •t':' -y;; ^■^v..~^^^.;: mmmMfil l:HM M Emm mmm^m mBfrnti' Am »T«- ., ^^,^■ ' ^.:-r -.i:^ ■. mAimiA llr^ ■'S' '-'ir "t.'l! I rT-"-w pj-' >1.. K^. f • r .' PHONE NO. Mm STATS OF (?^[N][lS©Tr^ ^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES METRO WATERS - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL 772-7910 ri; MN C r 1-S i=ii RLE NO.m-- u ^-. - Pi£? ■;•■ -••> ;v...T . "viM-5Si ...v v£ mmm April 23, 1992 mmAmm Mark Gronberg Coffin & Gronberg, Inc. 482 Tamarack Avenue Long Lake, MN 55356 Km CM APR Z 4 1S92 Wsws Pi',- .'i; ■ ^‘,T- JIE: AL MANSER SUBDIVISION, WETLAND 27-859W,OF ORC Si*-? V.-. \: £ v mm my-___x^mcmc ^K- HENNEPIN COUNTY (SE 1/4, SE 1/4, S.3, T.117N, R.23W) Dear Mr. Gronberg: I have reviewed the sketch plan (4/6/92 revision) and proposed i design (dated 3/7/92) for the above-referenced project propos The proposed road will not involve any filling in basins under jurisdiction. We have no objection to the city approving the r and subdivision as long as the proposed culvert under the x would not change the hydraulic capacity of the ditch between ”low wooded area" and the wetland to the northeast. No DNR per is needed for the current proposal, however, if any other culve or activities are proposed below the ordinary high water elevat this office should be consulted. « Please contact me at 772-7910 should you have further quest! regarding this matter. Sincerely, Ceil Strauss Area Hydrologist >Tii cc: Piiifi Jeanne Mabusth, City of Orono Ron Quanbeck, Minnehaha Creek WSD Tanager Lake (27-141P) file Orono shoreland file *• ' . 'vv;: ■ ||»|:;:pv££’^ mm mm Allfli m limm m r#ii9fi«i r«ifOi i^ R& ro«¥«i »ikkfi« •TVJilTfnT illm wm mm ili« fe: '■ ■ :i;v;n;;5^faipissii *•'• • ■' - . -■ . '' . • ■ - .:.:•* * *. »♦ : ■•: V. 1 1^ ♦. • .* :•*. •-pra.1 [sn r?I573 uK m p.,mm i- ;.- • ::--'.K%i^.-:^m -- - '-m liM F'i^Fs;,, . ,' ;4; m mmi 113 ■■pi-^3Sm ismm mm. m‘V :-5 •; ^ :Sff^TSP?^ • V r;;r .Smmm lKe:~:,-.ii0(mm B- -Mip®l mm-mm -: -:; ;• > m.:. mm i?asg ^117 nil ;v::'v?'*.#^;» t »•>]'■:-.m.m-mi:r. m Hi. li RS ii^i' ^::4; ^v;.f?. Kfi4 i?v iS iiiliiiai ■mm iii mm M»)li Bi ivlOfC* mil Ka 'ik f '9‘ki lip®® m ik^ 3i^:!i'Sl mmess:* ^W| ®|| '^:;M Wmkk:^ fy Wm mm ' : H ■ •!* pi'v:- :^> mm'ir Zoning File #1738 June 11, 1992 Page 5 The facility will require the extension of municipal sewer and water. The City Engineer recommends the force mam be extended from the manhole 800' south of entrance road to Orono school expansion plat (review Exhibit K) and then through the property via the outlot to the hockey arena building. Water c be extended from Old Crystal Bay Road or via the south from the City's new water tower and water lines. These are matters that must be worked out with the school district, the owner of the property. It is most important that if this use is approved and for this location that applicants' site plan specifically address buffering and shielding the residential properties to north and east. Lighting should also be designed to address the me concern in additioj'’ to all planned outcoor activities. Review of Issues Related to Orono School Expansion Subdivision Please review Exhibits K and L. The plat was created as a means to facilitate the purchasing of land by the school district from the former owner. The school district cannot purchase via contract and had to purchase under a fee title. The fou parcels were specifically divided and the school district was to acquire fee title over a 10-year period of time. The the school district entered into an agreement whereby the City would agree upon the acquisition of all four parcels by the school district to va'^ate the road outlot and all public easements as shown on the plat. It is the City's understanding that the school district is in the process of complecing final acquisition of the fourth parcel. It was then the intention cf the school to legally combine all four parcels and Outlot A into one parcel for future school use. The issue for the City now is how does the current subdivision impact the original agreements for the Orono school expansion. The subject parcel will no longer be owned by the school district. In order to meet the intent of th Comprehensive Plan access to site must be from interior roads. Can the City vacate Outlot A? How can City provide utilities to the eastern portions of corridor as well as the Orono Sports Facility if all easement are to be vacated? As all utilities are located either within Old Crystal Bay Road or to the south within Ciyt property, it is neccessary to expand utilities from west to east through this property, especially if we are ever to realize looped systems to the existing lines at the southeast corner o this corridor (at Willow and Highway 12 intersection). Review of Issues to be Resolved for Applicant 1. Is the ice hockey arena similar to the uses already listed in the conditional use permit or is a code amendment required or is the use not compatible with existing residential zoning? ■ J nt ol he he Is. to ts ire lin to ze of ;edl nt ng V Zoning File #1738 June 11, 1992 Page 6 2. .if-v >'. . •* . ' =■' :'. V ■i. ■-• rC- / • • MMl What are your concerns with the location of the proposed use? Absent relocating front facility to Old Crystal Bay Road, how can impact of this use be minimized on surrounding residential developments? In light of the agreement executed by both school district and City, how can municipal sewer and water lines be legally installed and maintained by the City? How can we plan utilities for ice hockey arena without also planning for future school? Now that the future use of the school prop02Tty has been determinadf are interior roa ways necessary to provide access to ballparks, school, hockey arena and residential neighborhoods to east based on intent of Comprehensive Plan Amendment? Review of issues that must be addressed with the planning for a formal site plan review. Relocate building as close to east and north side of property line and relocate parking and all outdoor activities to south and west side of structure. Lighting must be shielded downward and not directed towards residential lot lines. Applicant must provide information on type of lighting to be used. Parking shall be based on the standard for auditoriums, 1 parking stall fc'* * Redesign plan so tnat. a 50' wide road is shown running along east lot line to south boundary. Provide interior driving lanes from road within site plan providing access to parking areas ar.d rink. d. Signage is limited to 12 s.f. with a conditional ^se permitted use. Illumination of sign raust be review by City. e. Engineering plans for municipal sewer and water expansion. f. Develop plans with school district for stormwater detention pond designed for both storage capactiy and phosphorus removal for the stormwater runoff ^ from sperts facility and future school. Ponding and k drainage easements will be provided to the City with r the subdivision. g. Landscaping plans showing berming and landscaping to shield impact of structure along north and east boundaries . h. Provide fire lanes adjacent to structure. * L *■ I ts A--- 'i-.\ •^’>>v ' V-.^i ,• • - V r V f.' ej A 1 .Mm. >T--T;AlA s>,;::;'-V':;-f» ,aS|^ *; ■ y/’k fS- «v-' ; i:. tS-. •■ ,fcv;p :;"i \‘ Z\- I S.L ETJ WiMir&i »'*■' r ^ 'V -1.- w. f'..'-n^-JS ,v'- ::• ^ - -V- ;.i lAi ■.it i:-^\ R ^■»5^ri'.'A ^ t fiT Zoning File #1738 June 11, 1992 Building and Fire code review. (1) Building classified as an A-2.1 occupancy. (2) Minimum type of construction, Type V, 1 hour. (3) Automatic fire sprinkler system and fire hydrants required. (4) Building must be accessible to handicapped persons. (5) Elevator required for mezzanine level by State Building Code and Federal Americans with Disabilities Act. (6) Other issues raised by Planning Commission. (7) Pertinent issues raised by neighboring property owners. Issues to be Addressed with a Pomal Subdivision Application 1. Future access road to be shown along northeast side of property and to be dedicated and designated along east boundary to provide further loop road access to future residential developments to east and possibly to west. School to file in conjunctuion with subdivision application a vacation application for Outlot A of Orono School Expansion and all other drainage and utility easements deemed unnecessary by City of Orono. 3, The redesignation of access and utility easements through school property to provide for expansion of municipal services to east and north. 4, Per Park Commission recommendation of June 2, 1992 meeting (review Exhibit F), school to grant bike easements along Old Crystal Bay Road and County Road 6 and in lieu of additional park dedication lands to encourage leasing of lands from school district for baseball field use. 5, Should the applicant be advised to work with the School District on filing a PUD for the entire property? The proposed uses and impact of those uses suggest a need for more comprehensive planning. Review of issues raised by neighboring property owners in attendance. 7. Other issues raised by Planning Commission. It is the intention of the staff to present the Planning Commission's complete review comments to the Council for their final comment and direction. jsf ir wf Isv ,523-^ CITTY of ORONO ~ SUBDIVISION APPLICATION mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm tmm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm « PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address _ _ _ _ _ _ __ *: "Y Cv C^CNO Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) _____ Please check one - Property _ _ abstract or t««- 2 T 1992 torrens? mm Attach legal description to application APPLICANT Name C)j ^<11 k Address : 3 \CLO ^ / > Phone (home)_^13_l__S£3L3-lZ_—. ^Phone (work) G>^3C^ City; 0/<s—^/\/^ Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Ofe ^cL^rool X!!!!)’ Phone fhct i) Phone (work) Add3T0SS • (attach list if more than one) City:Zip: EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total/ all CITY OF OROf^O parcels rr/^AVrf OFFICE 1350200000 ^ Present Use (check)Residential? no. ether (specify) of units 01 i'tiV £:'00,00 CHECR-----JI 200-00 !<tuil^l-IYOU Present Zoning District a244i60 COOi ROl T0^‘^'Vwr* A 06/09/9. « PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Mfs Number of Building Sites:Existing Units New Units Total Units ■ Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Units per Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) iii . ' VI :,:.Aj .^:>i^-.“ •* •» < *■ MIMIMOM MATERIAL NBCBSSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION . < t il’^l^^TAtn^rSlZirion on Certificate of Su^ey 3. Certified Property Owners List of owners wj^thxn 350 (y°^u must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 4. As an addendtom to this application, please attach a separate list of any otherTpersons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ uace^- - - - - - - 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. ^Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_____ _ _ _ __j-- f-l-j r OF OFiOHO OFFICE 200,00 700,00 P. II '-iHriiui YOU :001 m T05:l' 06/09/9. es)m . i FEES ^5' Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class T *!I & all non-residential) * ; Final Plat Review (Class III) ~ *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application $200.00 300.00 300.00 325.00 + 25.00/Lot 175.00 150.00 100.00 mi orThe applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required requested by chi,^oning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission^tn^Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay Applicant's Signature itional fees established by ordinance Date .-■v ■u Land tm ■ 4 V < i?. ■V 4 .DateOwner's Signature ______________________________ « _ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scneduiea review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. * •’■ ! ain ter ■*4 of ■ *' ^ *1 (te 'iii i«i; pil* Pi >■- '■.i.iA'-..-,’ i^iS or ley, and .4^, the the lied t is e an ning m i-sai•V“v:-i:i- <,: • "r wm V'^': f:::M;;:«a m-^ri O SCHOOLS 5 Old Crystal Bay Road P.O. Box 46 ^ke, Minnesota 55356-0046 (612) 473-7313 Fax (612) 473-1477 r^ f < r* RtTHH* Neal J. Lawson Ass’t. to the Superintendent foiMi Ki mMmmi ®:^v.. vii June 3, 1992 ■^1 tor riTiT:!:^ mmm -.imkm leltl# m on this morning in regard to the Subdivision Orono Area Sports Facilities Inc., the ised by our legal counsel that we should not he District has approved the sketch plan. the option to purchase agreement for the ore we sign the application. ntion to delay the Orono Area Sports g the process required. The District would ono reviewing the sketch plan submitted by ■.:■ i' .w -V^yv questions 4#‘- ^ -W-' :. f . • • > 4- f > .> ■■■.J. •■■■i- y;^ ■■■. ■> jf:. ••• • v ‘■ •:• :■ ~^ ■:■ • ■ ■:";-.t f * ■fl . i < :•'n. • ^ », • iT ■ • iv-- . ■ ■ •' >»*• •.\V. teliwISlw '■ -iyfH ■'•j •■•••; ; jit'' >:'-t >.^-:•=•••=••• .-.'ImwfesiMmry HllP'iiii «' V., spsi ~* IX --vH jng Lake-Maple Plain —Mcdina-Minnetonka Beach-Orono a - f* r*_____m ndent 2 , ■ I :v._, ’"■i = ■■ p/1. I W'‘ i;-'H »V\ •S’ V ■»■*;; ■; Vi-, ■ : . ••.•••• • •. * •. :v =- V .>• •:■ CITY OF ORONO - NOTICE >v The Planning Commission of the City of Orono will hold a Public Inf oration meeting on June 15, 1992 at 8:00 p.m. for the ^ ?nc^ IhereinaftM plan f43°/3°-/f:|oo^"° and 'o\«ooV\^ce ^hrchiy^^renV on property owned by the Orono School District, 'f]'® ®“*’^°*^|'?P®erLctiln“of Of 40 plus acres located at the southeast quadrant 6th AvLue North and Old Crystal Bay Road - refer to location map on of this page. The parcel to be acquired by O.A.S.F.I. is approximately 5 acres in area and is located at the northeast corner of the property with direct access proposed at 6th Avenue North. The indoor rink is shown at 140'x240* and the outdoor rink at «5 ‘x20^0 ’. Detailed site plans are available at the City offices for review. The City offices are open 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.r Monday through Friday. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time, comments are encouraged. If residents have any questions, please contact Jeanne Mabusth (473-7357). WSSlfiflSas*»l ISETSaf? m '^ym mm i-j Wr^y I’>- wm Wm wmm- :V'--'VV . •- ;:.i -■• , mmUm mmm Bit;--.a:’ aili ;■ ■ MmM fmyy^y-y-yy:yyy^^^^^ ®iissaf«npwpp0%a y' Vr-:X '■ ' m'MMgymyyy&myygiKiisiiii ■iism i" ■" 'm ^ pj.;:. .■ ■■'m^/m ■f ■ ' ' .p" ■ area ccess c200’. t City itten >ntact ■ W mm P;pi SRfsSmmmi mKII * f ^' '. * -.vT^ © r^- D -■•» "I ■'M4? 5) ii mmMmSmrn m »roperty Owners list for the proposed Ice Arena located on Sixth Ave if, ^ 1^ - 28-118-23 32 0013 ' Henn Co Park Reserve Dist 3800 Co Rd No 24 Maple Plain, MN 55359 2 - 28-118- 23 32 0003 Francis M Johnson ||, 3060 6th Ave N " Long Lake, MN 55356 3 - 28-118-23 32 0001 F E Buschbom 1150 Homestead Trail Long Lake, MN 55356 i&m dX*' 'U '■‘K< :!i 4 - 28-118-23 32 0002 Floyd E Buschbom 1150 Homestead Trail Long Lake, MN 55356 5 - 28-118-23 31 0001 Louise M Otten P.O. Box 117 Long Lake, MN 55356 6 - 28-118-23 42 0002 John Lein 2700 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 7 - 2d-118-23 42 0003 Thomas P Carroll 2600 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 Ki mm 8 - 28-118-23 41 .0005 Thomas P Carroll 2600 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 mMm iMilim 4- ; r 9 - 28-118-23 41 0004 Diane M Erichsen 2500 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 0 - 28-118- 23 41 0003 Steven J Bouley 2450 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 1 - 12 - h: 28-118-23 41 0002 Michael J Schwarz 1125 Willow Drive N Long Lake, MN 55356 28-118-23 32 0006 Henry & Nancy Brantingham 3185 6th Ave N 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 28-118-23 32 0007 Benedict & Denise Young 3105 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 28-118-23 32 0008 John & Barbara Ryder 3045 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 28-118-23 32 0009 Jeffrey Eccles 3025 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 28-118-23 31 0004 James Swanson 2995 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 28-118-23 31 0008 Gary Larson 3085 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 i- 28-118-23 31 0005 Michael & Jo Ellen Wahlig 2945 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 *, / \ 19 - >a 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 28-118-23 31 0006 Roger Zeeb 2905 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 28-118-23 31 0007 H Robert Glavas Jr 2885 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 28-118-23 31 0002 School Dist #278 685 Old Crystal Bay Road N Long Lake, MN 55356 28-118-23 42 0005 Albin Thies 1442 Homestead Trail Long Lake, MN 55356 28-118-23 42 0006 School Dist #278 685 Old Crystal Bay Rd N Long Lake, MN 55356 28-118-23 44 0001 Orono Center Properties c/o Reiersgord Law Firm _ ft ^ ,1* : J.. m. ill • ■ ■ •■ =^-:- A -^>:i bi-v: -Ai ■m Kl bs ? m - '■ * 'fiWmm 'mml#::di mw.mmmm m§a '/ * *4S mm mmm mm mimm Immt vA^:m ;»s;. Mgnm:3 M-1 WM^rnKm - :r- -,v s:, ■ •'•'■'■■• -i- •'■••\ Pih sm RSiV-'"'V :.;■?■ m^m lA’i K ■ •.< - •? -J iisippHfUr^^ PiSi Ki t' - ■- ■ >. ' •*..■ ;v'V: r1-. • >vJ 3- I § I.T% _ • y»*»» fr: • •7‘T^ T»»- »•..h-i' ••; ^■’0- •' y' z Moating on the sale or lease of School District land for an Ice Arena and/or Little Baseball Fields 8:00 a.m., Monday, March 30, 1992 Persons present: $1 f^•■■ /'.'Jr k ■Ron Moorse - Orono City Manager John Cerhardson - Orono Public Works Director Mark Johnson - Athletic Association Tom Mich - Supt, Orono Schools Neal Lawson - Asst. Supt. Orono Schools /j' -V7 The meeting was called by Dr. Mich to informally explain the school's position on the possible sale of land to the Athletic Association for an j[c4i Q]7iina and the possible lease of land to the City of Orono for baseball fields. Dr. Mich explained that the District had a comprehensive plan developed for the approximately 50 acres of land being purchased by the District immediately across the street from the High School* The plan provides for an elementary school, related parking and necessary outside facilities. The plan also indicates approximately 10 acres of land in the north east corner of the property that would not be required for the development of this site. The District's current intention is to offer for sale the north east most 5-6 acres of land to the Athletic Association for the future site of an ice arena. An option to purchase agreement is currently being drawn up by the District's legal counsel for this intent. The District is also willing to discuss the potential of a long term lease with the City of Orono for the east adjacent 4-5 acres of land for baseball fields. It is anticipated that the City will approach the District with its intent to lease the land in the near future. ♦; *1. ■ Dr. Mich indicated that the paramount use of the property indicated above is for the purpose of housing Orono school District students and the proposed elementary school, however the District is willing to ••XX/laase the property as indicated above, provided this did not in any way adversely impact the District's intended use of the property. It was also indicated that the land has been and is intended to be rented for farming and any restrictions on the use of the land for this farming season should be presented to the District immediately by the City of Orono or the Athletic Association, by NJL 3/31/92 ■iji V, A ^‘■5; hi # :' ,'t- ."ilS . . . . . . . . t':' & wm iwrai p;^igKS3EMhHB g ;'... mmHiSiii Ww PM wmm :. -5/V‘. • ='. • :;-^ '/•^:-l-rfryl mmi^ ■fmm^ .‘J ip4 PSK®'-;-'fe;^:J :.-;-:^v:; ' •■•- t';-. >■ ■ * - 0%-:00 mmm RilPiifeMil ■.v> Rlil* raSIi rsii^ r.Mi' PFIi ram gni ^lil* ^rx* RFT* PK&J \S,::-i':S-^miM mm mmm': K pf Hilk^v.': v^ 'V'' m:t i#“V;,-/ RPW ' .':pisimbm% d^PP ■'.1 ptt: 5F15 PITT* mM^mmmmi^y-mmf-x wm r«ifi« rsf^w*Fi*j ^ b ^ i \'- >:vv^---^y..:-^. r; . V...; ..■,^'- ■■ ;v;.. ■•:•> ::»Ky....,mrv- Mil* :^.. m m- v-/m '.-i-.v ■ ■. i m p i-%^ m y iEii II m 'Wm tv -ir P::l||| £^HBHR k s. V. ; 'ii1»1 : ■ 4- -^ 'i . r ': •» >* ■ '^UJ v:V-X;^wm ■mm liiiAlwmMmmtv;:'.. '. :' fe:^: Siliiil hmmm ^!cm fiihm fisiKi mm m afeiS itfi Wmm Pll [•M#] •lilili P;lKi Mil*MiHi MfIK* L«K*R [•Hi rail# [i^OC nCOi RiFTi R;T*ri r*i^ r*Hti«] PI5K Mil* •lil#]i IMII ;WK« ! .• _? ■!. -.iL.! vi-a. a ■H p::, ^ ■.h: - 1. •. 1, ■■ mmm mm ■ f mm mmm mmim mmwm> mm mm -m jiftili^Ms»i mm H mm1“ ••■..?' •'■- •• mmm«iimppig ISMiltli»« mm SlKi^iBlE ^T» mmmmmm:-nSSItFU^RliK #T«i«r:j ri^«r#iP r«H« iilE,f RrnH* ,3 . ' '''fl ?'C-»; '-^ m " • •' •;/ ••. iilii* K:':;::lttiiiid rif^t SiiSii ^xsEiir*{ .3 '■ .. :m^:3 ttlifiimmm BiSap«m 'V-;?.-- T-r 'm '.'I the any :hat :key was the the • r. •. V ' • ught rai I ^ r ■■■■.: d be H I to may bike ►ckey Llong isl ve »s an ather \ the i the ■^Bsr HE:NN CTY PUBLIC WORKS TEL No .612-*930-2513 M % m vj ^ HENNEPIN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WO 320 Washington Avenue So' Hopkins, Minnesota 55343- PHONE: (6121930-2500 FAX (6121930-2513 TDD: (6121930*2696 ‘L ' "^1 i^L_ Jeanne Mebueth Planning and Zoning Dept. City of Orono p. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Proposed Athletic Site, Southeast Quadrant CSAH 6 at Old Crystal Bay Road Jeanne: As we discussed during our on-site review, Honni that all access to the above site be via Old Cr, if thT^recommendatlon Is deemed entrance onto Cotnty State Aid Highway (CSAH) t subject to the follcwlng conditions In preferen — A clty-“Street-typ8 entrance with full au I' ■ ■ - A parking lot driveway similar westbound bypass lane^located within 300 property line. Anv access to CSAH 6 should be between 40- and feat into the site. Careful attention should a circulation, parking, and drop-off service area Our Initial contact was Del Erickson, architect Me all should maintain close contact to ensure site and the motoring public. Please call with any further questions or discu Sincerely, V* Oavid K. Zetterstrom Entrance Permit Coordinator OKZ:nvr cc: Del Erickson, Archltsct eliltlfl. [§■ leSAii Pi KM 1^ If ...f aldel* • m ^K> ■ *• wm^ ■<: .'r: •f T# mmm mmsr mm mm. mm.m:mMMid m, ,.;#:immT:,:|i| -;--v:-i:.-:V:^ ••■■'•,••.*•' 5. * :" . . m WMWmmm mMmrnM liiilil mmi^ •Sl^jt’*;''rVi,:. :Vr: ■ ^ I&iil . \ -. istifc mil jfcV i..^-.,. I & Zoning Administrator .anning & Zoning Administrator mB . ■-:l ■'*,m.. cility i iHa i^til OThmI r«m«i r«rs««i WA9T-^ comments are offered: ndicates single family uses for chase of the large tract, while I Comp Plan since school's are a II results in uses not really Amendment No. 2 was formulated. I creating what essentially is a ility generating traffic at all the night, is probably not what led to believe would happen with .ndary and therefore can be served ehensive Plan surmised that tnis dential density, the high water •ea south of County Road 6 between icluded within the MUSA for future regarding the need to extend the lis development have any impact in truct the sewer interceptor that existing Long Lake mains? wetlands, and is not within the WM piSi»l f> :>.3 iiiaH fciiff ':4 wmsfmmm. 1.-;:- <•■;■■ fv-mMmmMmm : m 'm - ^ '. JkV- :" k- '■ /-■• :1:•': ’.. • •••* r • '.* *' V^3 at he t. ■ :-^ .. .'7n-. •. V«-i •:—77W'*;-«|p— “k.A . \ .■^A \*'.»'• ->*'-"»'V, -'Vl 7- ■A.^»fi\v: 7 . qi^^L t',-15 ... .(• /• •'■ U-. Joanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Lyle Oman, Building Official June 10, 1992 Orono Hockey Area 'ij t.-'j I? .- I have completed a preliminary building and fire code review of the proposed Orono Hockey Area. The following items should be noted: s i • .V'.. * r-'t m-mmr:-.. vf 5l^, V'C'*T^ rm Building would be cl.assified as an A-2,1 occupancy. Min. type of construction - Type V one hour. Allowable area - O.K, Preliminary exiting review reveals some fine tuning is needed. Automatic fire sprinkler system and fire hydrants required. Fire apparatus access O.K. Building must be provided with City sewer and water - approximately 20 SAC units. Building must be fully accessible to handicap persons. Elevator required for mezzanine level by State Building Code and Federal Americans with Disabilities Act. m w%jy I * ' ■ \tj V ■ w:m Wimm r-W ■ -M y,.iSZ W *., -.3 : V mmmm ■ w. ‘; ■ "«• .. y.^ y WUr/y-iii.i'tiiiii .•1^ A H--""iLa ¥* - * •••• '^Vi- - -x r ■ -u!^-/xyu:r " K; '■ ' '. |jr'.V^V.,. ■;■/ ''^li m hi ?V 7;- r ' ;■ •1 -si--, -.v ./ .--7. • > >: . :y {X >s: 'Px 'M-y ry\.--...iy A, X • mm ■ '..>•. ^';<v-. •V . • '' ' t. >v'- .;V ■ * "'•■: ■■ ■. ‘f; A K./ . ■ ' ■ -'. • ' 'v'' . '“A 4- u KT ^fcly'mmm p;a» •^-='3 •)h.;:- ,: ':v--, >.'iT".. .^1. \!-; • — V •::> /V'^> ■ V'X-:’'M.!l 9 P’^tea’- 35TT lixSw r*wi rui*:! . :• Yy.T-- ", V •■/*’5^V'. v'^"' W' 1 rtKfsi WMtIfj ■§;1^ PPS ‘ WlJ iia««a :'|Hpf: ,vdkm mnnsttssi pro fv''.' .r ^='i/'-. •';• # . Kfv.-v;' : i d e d d T h g e le It [c r» a. 'c :d )e v]- ^ Ilf mw-- mm- -l l - ^1 lisSiiI ».V>* 4‘ *• n S^:Wl WiM ■ yir. ;' II •lii *1*^ WtltTi rtliiu ^yriiw iiiisiii Wf-mm-m iicUon of a westbound bypass lane and an eastbound nght turn lane on CSAH 6 to ite adequate traffic patterns. The access street should be constructed adjacent to or ■ed on the east property line of the site. The sports facility should be required to provide:s.%“jrs’S,‘SS s ete curb and gutter. This width wUl aUow a left turn lane onto CSAH 6. '^e road could rrowed to 32 feet wide, south of the left turn lane. The access road should be comtructed : south line of the facility site with a 50 foot radius cul-de-sac at the end. When the school rty develops, they should be required to construct School Drive to the e^t and connect I access road, providing a through street for the area. The driveway from the sporto facihty ng lot to the access road should be a minimum of 100 feet south of the proposed nght turn 3n CSAH 6. drainage for the site runs northwesterly to the intersection of Old Crystal Bay Road and H 6 by means of an existing ravine that traverses the site. The dramage eventually reaches na Lake which is within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. A stormwater detention should be designed uoth for storage capacity and phosphorus removal for the stormwater if of the sports facility and future school. Ponding and drainage easements shouu e ided to the City. property north and east of the proposed sports facility is zoned for residential development, ing areas for public recreation areas such as the proposed sports facility and adjacent ields and ball fields are known to create numerous inconveniences to such residenbal erties. With issues such as noise and aesthetics in liiind, we recommend that the parKing be located to the west and south of the sports facility. The sports facility would be moved 1 ana east of the proposed location to accommodate this pa^ king lot shift. The parkmg lots d then be located in a more coiivenient area for the people using the playfielus and ball 5. The residential property could be buffered from the sports facility by installing berms landscaping along the north and east property lines. hope this engineering overview will be of use to the City Council and City Planning imission with their review of the proposed development. We would be pleased to meet with City Staff at their convenience, to discuss the above review and recommendations. se contact me or Glerm Cook at this office it you have any questions. rs veiy truly, •TESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. .vn D. Gustafson, P.E. }:dh AH 6 to ent to or □ provide :d on the owner of it-of-way. i of B618 Dad could instructed he school d connect Its facility right turn Road and ly reaches detention :ormwater should be elopment. 1 adjacent residential le parking be moved arking lots !s and ball ling berms f Planning I meet with )ns. t ' . m m' W- R- O V: ij «*v • 'i .v-• iy'li p- V. > # V' • y* )£25 ni 5486394 BIT!. 0» »««nt Itt IMUC «ca«* TRANSFER ENTERED oEc u as mbni^n ^ L .r}i»iiTY ^ / / DEVELOPER’S AGREEMENT FOR THE PLAT OF ORONO SCHOOL EXPANSION (Name of Development)V independent school district no. 278 (ORONO) (Name of Developer) CITJ OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA THIS AGREEMENT, Hade and entered into this _28th day November ^ 1988, by and between the City of Orono, a ’''Sa8B 'M isM m st\Mm of, - municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter called -City), and Independent School District Ho. 278 (Orono), an independent school district and political subdivision of the State of Minnescta, {hereinafter called -Developer"), its agents, successors and assigns. WITNESSETH: WHSRZAS, the Developer Is the buyer of the Property ' hereinafter defined pursuant to that certain purchase.agreement • dated June 2, 1988, as aawnded by that csrtalnjfltst Amendment ^ a ' 1 I. i* * • "» ' VI-*-- - ■ ■■■w 1 Ifn 1 f, :. |l«EIUEAS,.,Albin Thles aruft Arlene Thies,' eke, Albln f. ' Thies and Arlene L. Thles, respectively, husband and wife, end Sidney S. Phillips and Ruth L. Phillips, formerly known as Ruth 1.4 L. Thies, '■eapertlvsly, husband and wife {collectively* th* «r» r; *• , f • ♦ ^ page 1 of 18 ..jvcfejy • *.m- s/r" it** a I m \ % V*- • »• ^.-4 ib^rfiJUlU .......?• • '4. - ’r •• ' ,T' v.-i. V 'f'l K .I *' *5 ^"vr A* i^'r-^- • • 0 ' ’ *Thies ind Phillips"), sre the sellers pursuant to the Purchase Agreement and ore the present owners In fee simple absolute of the Property. WHEREAS, upon the closing of the transaction contemplated In, end subject to the terms and conditions of, the Purchase Agreetaent, Thles and Phillips shall grant end warrant to the Developer (a) fee simple absolute title In and to that portion of the Property which will be legally described as Lot 2, Bloch 2, and Outlet A, Orono School Expansion, according to the plat thereof to be recorded In the office of the County Recorder In and for Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "Plat") and (b) a loasehold Interest In ^ot 1, Bloch 2, and Locs 1 and 2, Bloch 1, of the Plat, together with an option to purchase fee simple absolute title In and to said Lot 1, Bloch 2, and Lots 1 and 2, B)ock 1. WHEREAS, the City Council has granted approval for the Plat on the condition that the Developer, with the consent of % the Thles and Phli’ips. enter Into thle Agreement to provlde^for thm utriBS and conditions upon ithlch th#'Dsvslopsr*shall! _____ _ _ ________ ‘C 4^'^ » « r r ^ mm Mobllgeted/to lnutslliCertaln5«bllc*roedwey •end^utlllty^ Oft Bfid COndli^rSvi^ts^irolnsfter^es^ V-'1 , Li;* f JdbiT I •*' . ’ *' *.^*^A,. * - 4J ».' • '^ • * •*•« * «.• >’ ar «r ♦ - i.'•4- iv »• •n •••cflMnt ("EasarMnt”) in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A Cor public roadway and utility purpoaea over, under and across said Outlot A. NOW, THEREFORE, in Consideration of the Property and the ■aitual proaises and conditions hereinafter contained, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1. Property beacrlotion: The resl property ("Property") is located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, and is presently described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, CRYSTAL CREST, according to the recorded plat thereof; and that part of Lot 2, lying east of the west 642.00 feet thereof. Block 1, CRYSTAL CREST, according to the recorded plat thereof. 2. Condition Precedent to CnnHtrupfeian of m s/.V 2.1 The City shall not permit or require the use of Outlot A for public or private roadway or utility purposes without the prior written consent of the Developer, which consent shall be at Developer's sole .•*v •• discrstiona and shall not hava tha right to oonatruct , , ^ J >.{•< _ _ _ _install or to raquira tha Davalopar or any^othar*parson to construct ^or install any .Isprovnants /oripubiie i' ^ &prlvute ‘toadway^r' utility purposes'(collectively *; i "Xavrovements") over, under snd sctois ssid Outlet A, unless (a) the Developer fails to acquire fee Page 3 of 16 > '"r!»2 r*:'v TO. ' •" • M 1^ > . •1 PTJUraiBS OOMHISSION MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 15, 1992, 7:00 P.M. 1275 BRONN ROAD SOOTH ~ OOONCIL COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - Mary Butler ATTENDANCE •* m:ko niED PUBLIC HEARING 1. 7:00 p.m, #1743 Albert Hanser, 1685 Fox Street - Preliminary Subdivision B ULBD PUBLIC INFORMATION MBETINC K\-■m ’i. 2. 8:00 p.m, #1738 Orono Area Sports Facility, Inc., 2675 Sixth Avenue North - Sketch Plan Review for Proposed Subdivision and Conditional Use Permit t'w' 'to.. i*'- V f’- 'r m ACTION ITEMS - Review of these items will commence prior to or between scheduled public hearings. Applicants presenting variance requests before the Commission are asked to move to the podium at the front of the chambers when their application is announced by the Chairman. 3. #1739 >1 J ■■■ V.l i.-'* > " Albin J. Nelson, 500 Oxford Road - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing tel 4. #1740 Steven M. Harris, 3850 Watertown Road - Renewal Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing 5. #1741 Rodney J. and Shanon K, Batslaff, 1115 Brown Road S. Variance - Public Hearing 6. #1742 James and Amy Laing, 500 Orono Orchard Road Variance ~ Public Hearing 7. #1744 Donald Helgager, 3265 Sixth Avenue North - Variance - Public Bearing M 8. #1745 J. 'f David R. Carlson, 620 Big Island (P.I.N. 22-117-23 31 0025) - Vari.ancas - Public Hearing 9.Charles Cudd Company, 2110 Sugarvooi Drive, request to revise driveway alignment PLANNING COWaSSION COi 10.Report by Planning Commission Representative to Council Meeting of June 8, 1992 (Stephen Peterson). 11. 12. Status Report by Lake Use Committee Representatives. Status Report by Facilities Committee Representati'*es, 13. Other issues r- f — r iki fifiiAMriim ADDITIOHAL ITENS :4m ■W ‘fc 14. Planning Commission approval of minutes of May 18, 1992 meeting. 4. 0M' Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the July 13, 1992 Council Meeting. ■ • ■>: ■■ ■ ■ 4. vitA!; ^jr ^ • 13 • V ^Wm: ff’^' ■■ ■'. - ‘••pSc^ * mmm.. ■; wmm t^:; > ww ■:- ••»t,'..r. ■ : , 0 • -V" ; .-A ■ ^ir^' - ■ ■■ .fe iilf4 ■r>- k'a;.'.' > •••r • ■ "-M. />. . ^ , #.;4- '..'v ' • .V.! • . .-.r-‘ ■■ : '• • j* *•• •rJL-^y- ■ *ii;2 ' ;?i53 ■ 1 ■. 4. ■ - =v. ■vA; » . ,■ JH> i -^ --'•> »-ri .•• : iw mmm 0si^Ss^‘'■m-ssMism^ mmi r ■ >-,.. ; : •T-f X y i'.'^v lanning Ccrnmis^jxlJl Council .■iiimii ::m "d' r UT PUBLIC ATTENDANCE WF^ CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE t ,> h^b..Ol 4 PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. ' \t NAME (please print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER ^ PRESENT FOR (from agenda)^ !;> 1. AlfaiKj T< a/£t/l^q/^' {■[^ U(t:AVlj£i=3:^/rC /i, ^ L 3 . /hwk ^ ^‘/J'f ry,/l^iT U /7V? 4. ^ v^.<?xSr>vJ “2.^400 ^«3(-^ .V .WW7 rV-*' • y /. 'v •'t Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator N ifmmte:3 Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator June 8, 1992 #1743 Albert Hanser, 1685 Fox Street - Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing Zoning Districts RR-lBf Rural residential, 2 acre minimum Total Area *= 29.14 acres exclusive of road right-of-way (15.76 wet, 13.38 dry) Lot 1-7.3 acres (4.02 dry, 3.28 wet) Lot 2 - 10.43 acres (4.8 dry, 5,63 wet) Lot 3 - 12.10 acres (5.25 dry, 6.85 wet) Pertinent Ordinances (All ordinances reviewed under Application #1721, 5-lot plat) Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B). RR-IB Rural Residential Lot Standards. Section 10.56, Shoreland Regulations. A.Recreational Development Lake - Tanager Lake. Structural setback - 100' Septic setback - 75' • I V Setback from wetland. Browns Bay watershed (Section 10.55, Subdivision 8) Structural setback - 26* Septic setback = 75' Chapter 11, Subdivision Regulations List of Exhibits ■t. A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D-1-4 - Hardcover Fact Sheets (Proposed Lot 1) E - Hardcover Map ? - DNR Letter 4/23/92 G - Revised Preliminary Plan . J Review of Current Application. Applicant has resubmitted a subdivision of a 3-lot plat. Proposed Lot 1 remains the same as in the original 5-lot review. All original hardcover calculations submitted are still valid for current review (Review Exhibits D-1-4 and E). Each lot well exceeds the lot standards of the RR-IB zoning district- and Shoreland Regulations. Previous septic testing remains valid for 1 •• *4.: C-rin^ • -•^►•*' Zoning File #1743 June 8, 1992 Page 2 the proposed 3-lot subdivision. The City still has concern that septic test sites be protected prior to developement of Lots 2 and 3. The City must receive written confirmation that there is adequate area to serve guest house use as it is still the intention of the applicant to maintain guest house. The Planning Commission may decide that septic test confirmatior can be provided at the time of a conditional use permit review. The original review by the Park Commission will remain still in effect. The decision of the Park Commission at their March 2nd meeting was to obtain cash in lieu of land. The current 3-lot application involves a request to use a driveway to serve Lots 2 and 3 rather than being required to install a private road. The access off the driveway serving Lot 1 is a secondary access facilitating access to tennis court and detached garage structure. In consideration of the DNR's review comments for the 5-lot plat (review Exhibit F) and the preliminary comments of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District# staff will ask for detailed road plans for private drive if the City approves applicant's requests for a driveway versus a private road installation. As of this writing, the City has not received applicant's request to use drive rather than private road. Some of the findings noted by applicant's consultant at an earlier meeting are as follows: Minimize impact on sensitive area. Based on proposed house locations, single driveways minimize visual impact on adjacent residence on Fox Street. Secondary access off driveway serving Lot 1 is a secondary or accessory access where majority of visitors to property use principal access drive located to west side of property. Staff Reo sndation To recommend approval of the 3-lot plat subdivision application of Albert Hanser for the property located at 1685 Fox Street finding all standards of the RR-IB, Shoreland Regulations and On-Site Septic Code have been satisfied. This approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant to dedicate 33' of right-of-way for • Fox street. mm- * ----^ 1 1 '-V.' IKIMW >h ^ f. W V ' .■ 'ri ‘'-^i ^im Zoning File #1743 June 8, 1992 Page 3 2. 4. is ■KAi; ■ .r-"! it- : ' Applicant to grant Flowage and Conservation Eaaement over all designated wetlands within the plat. Wetlands to the north and east of the property to be designated at the 932.3 elevation. This shall also include area defined as low wooded area within proposed Lot 2. Septic test sites within Lots 2 and 3 shall be staked prior to required land alterations for road and drainage improvements. Structure located within Lot 2 close to west lot line shall be removed prior to final plat approval. On-site Septic Manager shall be advised of time of removal to ensure there is no damage done to the septic test sites on Lot 2. Applicant shall file a separate conditional use permit for guest house use as structure will continue to be used for non-rental residential use. The following Improvements or structures are recognized as non-conforming based on either their substandard setback to the shore of Tanager Lake or to the designated wetland. All structural repairs to these non-conforming structures shall require approval of the City of Orono. The non-conforming structures are as follows: a. b. c. Guest house on Lot 1. .Detached garage on Lot 1. lt '-"' Tennis court on Lot 1. Based on the Planning Commission's resolve of the access issue# the City will accept the original road plans submitted for private road construction for 5-lot plat or if a driveway is to be permitted, the City will ask for plans for the driveway to ensure positive drainage is maintained per DNR and MCWD standards. The City Engineer will be asked to review and approve the driveway plans prior to installation of road to ensure guidelines are satisfied. Applicant's consultant has asked for a refund of the private road fees submitted with 5-lot plat. The City will wait until the City Engineer has completed his review of the 3-lot plat before a refund is determined. ••vri »" y. ■ CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Z/^^jT fTAe^T , 1in ;) -5^>—^-Z' :,1 nrj-r’-- ’•] M ft.'usT'-jr-'i* -p, Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Please check one - Property abstract or Attach legal description to application. torrens? APPLICANT Neune /f. Phone (home) Phone (work) Address: A'rrA^^T OWNER (if different than applicant)^ Name - Z’ ' - - - - City: £c^Jr7ATA I mam «m 1 • mm mam mm mmm mm mm mm mm mm Phone (home) Zip: SsS^t Phone (work) Address: (attach list if more than one) City:Zip: V / k t I Ul Lft EXISTING LAND USB Number of Tax Parcels .rji. r Development Size irii ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ U50200000 01 400.00 OitCK TL 4QO.OO , f<2CLIPl-lVAm )W /y> Acres Dry Land H2420i0 COOl ROl llOj- Js, -76 Acres Wet Land 05/Zl/i Acres Total, all parcels"lO. <T2 Present Use (check)X Residential? no. of units Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ / Present Zoning District PROPOSAL X Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) ^7./Z0 Units per Acres > - - frAfer . Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land X . it.'f.. Residential Other (specify) I • ‘ • ^1 f. _ 1fi * ) Ww iM . ■ * • 3. I. MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION L. Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat informar.ion on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Canter 348-3271). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. iertification by Zoning Departmc^nt that Preliminary Plat Application is :omplete. oning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ In ­ payment of fees (park feesy filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. ertification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete, oning Official's Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ EES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III)$150.00 Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement m • • Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) 250.00 250.00 .Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential ) h 300.00 + 20.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) ’^(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* le applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or •quested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, .anning Commission and Council necessary to ^process this application and irther agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. plicant's Signature^ ner's Signature Date S-ZZr TZ Date S-ZZ-9Z. 0 plicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the anning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the ird Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled view meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is able to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an thorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building fi Zoning fice of this change prior to the meeting. .* ,ijk ii -...n f..': ' ■ V.-;: £&feiniiliiiis' i . ‘ # • Iu '/ ► •*ll • ••. . » ■ • • ■ • I /'A» v.-:i *• ^ i« •. • A -., •, . . •* . * .. ‘ ». »*> • ♦ • . , •« ■ • * ^ • • .«' • * • * • - •*; % , \ \ i•. I . i • ... » • * -V -•.** .V ' .* ' V *. • X * •* * * ■ * I •«^. *' . * **‘■^1*; ' /• •. . • •' • • :• • • • S5§iis I ill:; ., - isii ■■>«, iliiris;-vv;.: -.ris H / • • i--' . •• • .• *. t. .•*• V* •..» » .f*. -V t ■*■ • . •* * • . • •. r ^ TB n H H o w N. S X M 0» O O ni ni C/> ____N _ - V- ;’ ■ • 'S-- -■ Km. ••• .*. * * ‘‘ j2 ' c -- ^ X -»1 •»! *n M U4 H M M Q ^ U1 o m m X IO C r- r- ro aatASM o m 3 O o X m X X •‘V h: ..V . V. • -V *• ••X • ^ * ,s. • •• •. • • % • .• - •; • ■»* * *.*• .. ' ^ oo ■ '■'■’• m'®a*V t’ ii" - •• ^ ,. ^* • ■4 • •■ * •* • .• • » • ■ * •» A '' TTy- A'-f ' • ssgs H *!5 </> CO o > > M r- r* r- r- ® < < Ui 0» a o =c ac 2 § Inin 1/4 vO >- m m X X (/)H O I/I I M M Irs> \M aoo M 3 Sr- > •HnX -< ^ H in a o -5 -n X X !</>§§ “ss Jinm:s - . • sg ‘ 2!wg I M •n M§r rv» c/> IH “■-j: O jO oooM A * .-A* •• “ * ■ • ^ t* •, ••- ,.V: 2 * *■ ' . '4 . v ‘- I M A • i:. ‘ . *•' • • *• u *: X X_ - s q;5”>> m z a O X > o a XX I » z o n X m > X _ > m z a o ^ X XX W - •• N H J* . ilii 11 nl > X _\ -< >> m z 2 o X > 2 *o ^ X X m • oo M 3 • 3 > > O V4 X O' c ^ ® ®___X oo m m U4 X X 0» o / 3 M H H l» Z o___• • »^ cn o o : - M ^ M P O e ^ m O' Q N m X H 2 O -SI *'a * m > > o I s jq2 M A ^ fN» ___________Ui_ m m m p rs» X X X 0) I/I %M In in IM > hO .M X O 1/4 O' p o IV> IM ■n Msrrv» P IH ^ w I/I X X ooo rj X M ^ o ^ ^> in S > f-* ®-< fo -H H in ^ N o X X M •. •C >>oo • . . H *n X X :§S53iA>^ A Z!q«,wSr : • • - u, SSJJ5'- • •. . S is ^ • • '•;s kI}S o • -• ; O . • • • • • ' ^ c t w *!• J.• f . •• • r» ’. • - '* •*•• 3w > > 5i®si H in o X >3 o w M G» M S P* _ O' r* r- r* o X IP p o m m X X 2 M H H * 5 a o O I/I o p o i/I CD o M X M C t. o M I jS .MP o a p m 5 o m rn m fs» X X X M > M O M O I X rs> m 1/4 P p ui H -n > O N> p r- • 7 o p o p o P i/4 Msmo p p p vO H !is rv» c. P P "^w ooo p •A W • • * . A ♦ ' V * .5 X n o X ^ 2 S S i i P o P P o m m X X M H H O P o P o pP o IN) I M > M O «A| O I X M m p o ni ni m P M X X X P poo n 2 znu o rs»^goo 4. 3 Z 2 X M • *i3,-DSVmm p p .8 Si"*" ooo p oo • t—'.... 1 '■< A •• • • <■ #•«' M «• 2» 'i. -. • 4.,. .r* ■ I* * 8 9S P P oooM «. 8IH ./ A » « A*' ^ . • • •m ^ ■ *> • • # . ■ 4 ♦ V •• O .f . * • ' I'wJt.i/ » .. . *• AP^--'. *.' .• ♦ >i4 • • 1 . •*^- ■ r* r _ek» MW .;.•. . P vr*Pi; V. V- '' • - « ^ •• •• .* •• * • »*. •• ,••. •■ >r < • • • •> • " ■ f ■•' ^V-’ ’ T’' ■ ‘ • .♦ , •; - .. • ' • ‘.C .• • • . o M * • • • ^ •..'ivv. . 'j • • • V.- . # • *4 • •/• * •■ ''*• * •- -s •* *y. . •'.y Vi*.*n.’' • ^ f ‘.‘J-- *w. • j K^/U^ ' ^ -j ; V.- -r; ^ • r* ... A-^. . • t -* :.v * . y aIa/* . *. V A ’ • •v^ r*» ' ‘ • A \ •. U , .i. f'.V- •• *■ . 9*• ("•^,r.V'V-Vij - 0 ■■ c AU V ■ '■'Wv • i HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET l«- . ♦v' • -' , ‘wf L:SETBACK zone: (circle-ONE) C0-75>» 75-250' 250-500’ 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone •' * ■ ■•• mfm. \ • ■ House S.F. LENGTH WIDTH • • • • . X - S.F. S.F. r- • —T . •Sfs" -Wm X 1 ___S.F. ♦ - • B. Garage • • •»• • • c. D riveway .. X teasiv .sfc- HH. D.. S idewalk 1 ■■■ E. Patio / D eck ♦ •• • V’ F.Landscape AREAS underlain BY , plastic ---------- SHEETING •• t »m Total Hardcover in Zone - Total Property Area in Zone B 2<Z, SOO X 100 - ___^ • * • r. '» • • » • • •• • *4 4^ • mm S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ZO^i^QO lt S.F.B •• mmmmm .«•••■ • • • 141 ^J*r m : ■ ■■■yf Ki -■*•' • / "'■m m 1.0 T HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE' ONE) 0-75" 250-500" 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone m^> r*j ♦A. ■ House m length • • t Ci4€xr /^ouse 3l . z if • «. * Garage •• • • • Driveway D.. Sidewalk l • 4 <li:' E. Patio/ Deck m:- V :'V ^ m F.Landscape _ areas UNDERLAIN BY ■ , _ _ _ _ PLASTIC- - -’'•• SHEETING • -*0 • «• G. Other ^ • ssso WIDTH 3c8 X V • • •• • <^yo • • • • « ♦♦ Total Harocover ih Zone /2 s. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. f'--Total P roperty A rea ik Zone S.F. S'^^Soo t S.F.B /2.S9^ -L B 5~<C 3 oo X 100 -22.SS ' IM*. . •' 8. ifi tur Tt • • • • • am •»- »••• f ’•* •<»« • • Mm. t ^ jv »> • . •>T- fM • * “*• i*i.-fl . • 8 •• • ■, %• \ ■Ml ’C ■r. A. ■ House H/iK/rc/t HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK zoi'E: (ciRCi-E-ONE) 0-75’ 75-250' C2^-500') SOQ-IQOO' Existing Hardcover in Zone % • /Z.5 0 LENGTH WIDTH X . • • •• • ^ JO c. Driveway SSZ o €ATT 3SOO • «• #9 D.. Sidewalk * ^ATIO/ Deck • •• F. Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY ■ . PLASTIC- ' SHEETING • , TVX/^/ S con 4 T G. Other __ X ______ X SJ.S a •« % • S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F, _ S.F, S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F, S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F, Total Hardcover in Zone S.F. Total Property A rea m Zone y//, /oa t S.F. B /Z9?2_‘ ■— m ///.JOO X 100 - '"f -V . : W-.• . *ip« **%' ' :t-0 • M «#.••• 00^ •00000 • iL.- i-i-tz ■ V'*-m ■J'i . *» i: I- ■r -■ - ■; -1<( t . • • 7 ■;?* HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET . • __ _^ SETBACK zone: (cmcLE-one) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' (fOO-1000.: Existing Hardcover in Zone B. Garage - X I • §r» c. Driveway D,. Sidewalk •. X • . • ' u' ■av^‘- >' J-/ -.. e.^Patio/Deck m .; ^Tv' V t F.Landscape _ areas UNDERLAIN BY ■ , _ _ _ _ PLASTIC- - - - SHEETING • •• • G. Other •« \ • WIDTH • • • • f • •• • /o?o \ .. ; Total Hardcover in Zone yy*/6 Total Property A rea in Zone yi./oa t S.F. S,F. S.F, S.F, S.F, S.F, S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. -I * ' « , ■ i ■ .*fV^ *-1 my VTflytn B r.131 ? / J ~B 3?. /oo X 100 t/^07 • ( *M» • % » • • • • M •*.••• iiiiiaPii’ihiirnffirt Jlr^ ■ '■ ■■.'••.•. ■•. ' ■=v‘ h-r: . . y - r. mmM. i • ♦ I r=.* 'r..Ki \: *V mmmm mmmi ?i?psr ^ r ^■1uWl STATE OF iM[f50iis<o>Tr.^ hk department PHONE NO. OF NATURAL RESOURCES METRO WATERS - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL 772-7910 ‘..vVf >^MN-u ■ .5 5106 0;l_c U'uLsl^L.u c April 23, 1992 ia F 4-APR 2 4 1 mm:mrtM Hark Gronberg Coffin & Gronberg, Inc 482 Tamarack Avenue Long Lake, MN 55356 “• is„S!;rcoS”74”*, .7, Dear Mr. Gronberg: •sm V mm I have r^i^wed the sketch plan (4/6/92 revision) and propose* design (dated 3/7/92) for the above-referenced project pri. iSrildiction Involve any filling in basins Sndi ^ ob3ection to the city approving th< and subdivision as long as the proposed culvert under^ the would not change the hydraulic capacity of the ditch betwec wetland to the northeast. No DNR p o® current proposal, however, if any other cu5 tM« ordinary high water ele^uhls office should be consulted• mmyM me at 772-7910 should you have further ques regarding this matter. ^ Sincerely, mrn\ Ceil Strauss Area Hydrologist t.' |^.4i cc; rT» ‘ • ■mmmimmymmmm Jeanne Mabusth, City of Orono Ron Quanbeck, Minnehaha Creek WSD Tanager Lake (27-141P) file Orono shoreland file Ml ;v.yM:=i ■ i-y m •Me wmi ui a'- iii'f' f ji .i,' Tif. • ' ,5:; mm AN FO'iAt. ODPORTUNITY EMOLOVFR m m mm Ki ft r*V^Til m • ■ :. -fl %mmm t'-i.-e': X. _x- irnm tsw^ Kiifl :^v; rj.i.v A'v.', -■:■■ V •■•v-.-. ^'m Hi mm• • X- :• ' * mmmK--PPIE ilK■■^if;; ; A; : mm m Wm:■ m:mm-mmm 'i-UKvys.' fea*K-'AS ■ Effi-A j-i - -V- ' :-AA '_>i ' .-.. ._. • *. ... iiii? 11 iWiplis:sa^Al - > mnr ^1.^4.?? *;.cv4i1^52 i” i»-^' I^;v Zoning File #1738 June 11, 1992 Page 2 List of Exhibits A - Application A-1 - Orono School District Letter B-1-2 Notice/Map Sent to Adjacent Property Owners C D E F G H I F'’ lap:':'' i ?■ y^' Property Owners List Notification Map . . ^ Memo on Meeting with Orono Staffs School District Personnel and Athletic Association Park Commission Minutes 6/2/92 Hennepin DOT Letter 4/27/92 Gaffron Memo 5/29/92 Oman Memo 6/10/92 J - Gustafson Report 6/10/92 K Plat of Orono School Expansion L - Developer's Agreement for Orono School Expansion Plat M - Easement Agreement N - Conceptual Site Development Plan for Orono School District 10/1/90 , O - Packet of Exhibits and Information Prepared & Submitted by Del Erickson, Architect for Applicant. (Please refer to this packet for elevations, site plan, site topography, review of alternate sites, and cost analysis.) mm.•A.--, Review of Sketch Plan Application t- * • ' ‘ij The applicants were advised to apply under a sketch plan review as part of the comprehensive proposal Involves a future subdivision. A major issue for both applicant and City is the issue of proposed use and the fact that the use is not specifically listed under the specific conditional use permit section but references other similar uses. The City is asked to consider the ice hockey arena as a similar use to those listed as permitted via the conditional u^e permit. In the late 1980's, the City completed a comprehensive plan of the Highway 12 area. This property was specifically approved for single family residential use. The property had been included within the MUSA boundary line and with Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 2, the eastern portion of the property bounded by Willow Drive was to be included within the MUSA. The saturated soils will necessitate sewer as septic use is not feasible. If ■ r John Shardlow, the consultant planner for the City, has been asked to review proposed use in relation to the ordinance section under consideration. As of this writing, staff has heard nothing but will report at your meeting. mm .A 1 * ■idiUteU li .sl^/ i •♦= ■•■ ' ■ '^i % ' 'C ' p. ■ *« t' ■-•: ■', ^ 1il. v: 7 ;f > !• . ». 7: V-; .; ,•-.r yf^:- Zoning File #1738 June 11, 1992 Page 3 Neighboring property owners to the north, during the time of the comprehensive plan review, were aware of the more intense uses proposed within southern portions of the corridor^ but were promised a residential buffer along the north lot line. The current RR~1B zoning does permit certain quasi~commercia1 uses found to be compatible with single family residential zoning. In early discussions with the Planning Commission Chair, it was decided that it would be beneficial for the City to receive early input from adjacent property owners. The City staff advised the applicant of their concern for the proposed location in the northeast portion of the school property and questioned if they had asked for access and a site off of Old Crystal Bay Road. The applicant advised that the school district, based on their comprehensive development plan for the property. Exhibit N, noted the only suitable area available for sale would be the northeast portion of the property. The reviewing staff was also advised that members of the City Park Commission had discussions with the Orono School District about the leasing of lands for ballpark use. Ballpark use is not a formal part of this application. The applicant has provided an information packet that should answer many of your questions and provide background information on the applicant. Applicant has met with both staff and the Chair of the Park Commission and Planning Commission and was given guidelines as to the types of information that would be needed to complete at least this very preliminary stage in review. In the information packet submitted by applicants’ architect, note various other parcels of land were considered within the corridor and it was determined this site to be the most economical and suitable for their purpose. The a^olicant is a non-profit corporation and, based on a recent bill .^^^proved by the State, will be exempt from payment of real estate t ...e*". The very first objective for the Planning Commission is to determine the compatibility of use and to decide if it is similar enough to be considered under the conditional use permit section of the code. If the use is found acceptable but not specifically addressed in the code, would the Planning Commission recommend an amendment of the code to include this specific use? Staff has reviewed approximately 7-8 cities that have similar ice hockey arenas. The majority of them are on City-owned property within a municipal PUD with underlying residential zoning. Although owned by the cities, many are operated by private sports organizations. In reviewing the commercial sections of our code, there is no specific ice hockey arena use nor is there a section that deals with similar spoits-type arena uses. The majority of recreational uses in the Orono code are permitted under conditional use permits within residential zones. ■i •i 7^ r- ^n\ Zoning File #1738 June Ilf 1992 Page 4 It will be important for Planning Commission members to listen to the concerns of the residences most impacted by the proposal* If the use and proposed location of use are approvedf many of the concerns raised by the residents should be addressed in developing a conditional use permit and approved site plan for the formal conditional use permit application. Some of these issues have been addressed in the City Engineer's report r Exhibit J. He recommends buffering with berms and landscaping along the east and north side of propertyr relocating structure so that parking and outdoor activities requiring lighting are relocated to the west and south side of building (i«e* building can be used as the buffer to many of those activities). If members feel a zoning amendment is necessaryf provide staff with direction as to appropriate setbacks, special It.ndscaping needs, parking, lighting, signage, etc. It is unfortunate that the only available site on the school property is the proposed location at the northeast corner providing the most impact or existing and future residential development. It would be the hope of the City to work with both < the school district and the applicant to determine if the use could be relocated along Old Crystal Bay Road (review Exhibit^ N, specifically area of soccer field) in an attempt to minimize impact on residential use. General Comments Concerning Site Plan Structure is shown at approximately 240' x 140' at an approximate area of 33,600 s.f. In the earlier review of parking needs, staff reviewed the formula for community centers, stadium and auditorium parking. Applicant has provided parking for the most restricted at 250 with the potential for future expansion. It is the intent of the applicant to provide parking for the baseball users during off-season. The two curb cuts are shown directly off of County Road 6 and in an early meeting with Hennepin County DOT, it was determined that access along the west side of the property is unsafe and that access to the site must be at the most eastern edge. It is recommended that an interior road be planned along the east side of the property. Applicant would be responsible for installing road per standards set forth in City Engineer's report. In that report the City Engineer recommends that the road be installed to the south side of the proposed lot with a temporary cul-de-sac and that a through road be developed at the time of further development. Staff will address this issue later. The building is shown at a maximum height of 32' and will require variance approval, as 30' is maximum allowed for the zoning district. Review Exhibit I, Oman has listed all the pertinent items that will need to be addressed by applicant, i.e. sprinkling of building, payment of approximately 20 sac and sewer and water units. His report also noted the need for an elevator to mezzanine area. f . • 4<- W n' mr-4( Zoning File #1738 June 11, 1992 Page 5 The facility will require the extension of municipal sewer and water. The City Engineer recommends the force main be extended from the manhole 800' south of entrance road to Orono school expansion plat (review Exhibit K) and then through the property via the outlot to the hockey arena building. Water can be extended from Old Crystal Bay Road or via the south from the City's new water tower and water lines. These are matters that must be worked out with the school district, the owner of the property. It is most important that if this use is approved and for this location that applicants' site plan specifically address buffering and shielding the residential properties to north and east. Lighting should also be designed to address the w-iiie concern in additioj^ to all planned outt ’oor activities. Keview of Issues Related to Orono School Expansion Subdivision Please review Exhibits K and L. The plat was created as a means to facilitate the purchasing of land by the school district from the former owner. The school district cannot purchase land via contract and had to purchase under a fee title. The four parcels were specifically divided and the school district was to acquire fee title over a 10-year period of time. The City and the school district entered into an agreement whereby the City would agree upon the acquisition of all four parcels by the school district to va'^ate the road outlot and all public easements as shown on the plat. It is the City's understanding that the school district is in the process of completing final acquisition of the fourth parcel. It was then the intention cf the school to legally combine all four parcels and Outlot A into one parcel for future school use. The issue for the City now is how does the current subdivision impact the original agreements for the Orono school expansion. The subject parcel will no longer be owned by the school district. In order to meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan access to site must be from interior roads. Can the City vacate Outlot A? How can City provide utilities to the eastern portions of corridor as well as the Orono Sports Facility if all easement are to be vacated? As all utilities are located either within Old Crystal Bay Road or to the south within Ciyt property, it is neccessary to expand utilities from west to east through this property, especially if we are ever to realize looped systems to the existing lines at the southeast corner of this corridor (at Willow and Highway 12 intersection). Review of Issues to be Resolved for Applicauit 1.Is the ice hockey arena similar to the uses already listed in the conditional use permit or is a code amendment required or is the use not compatible with existing residential zoning? w 1 m mi iiil'"' -i Zoning File #1738 June 11, 1992 Page 6 What are your concerns with the location of the proposed use? Absent relocating front facility to Old Crystal Bay Road, how can impact of this use be minimized on surrounding residential developments? In light of the agreement executed by both school district and City, how can municipal sewer and water lines be legally installed and maintained by the City? How can we plan utilities for ice hockey arena without also planning for future school? Now that the future use of the school property has been determined, are interior roadways necessary to provide access to ballparks, school, hockey arena and residential neighborhoods to east based on intent of Comprehensive Plan Amendment? Review of issues that must be addressed with the planning for a formal site plan review. a.Relocate building as close to east and north side of property line and relocate parking and all outdoor activities to south and west side of structure. 1-b.Lighting must be shielded downward and not directed towards residential lot lines, ,'pplicant must provide information on type of lighting to be used. Parking shall be based on the standard for auditoriums, 1 parking stall f(*>*> '-p. c.Redesign plan so thac a 50' wide road is shown running along east lot line to south boundary. Provide interior driving lanes from road within site plan providing access to parking areas and rink. ...TTRaaBBo d.Signage is limited to 12 s.f. with a conditional use permitted use. Illumination of sign must be review by City. Engineering plans for municipal sewer and water expansion. Develop plans with school district for stormwater detention pond designed for both storage capactiy and phosphorus removal for the stormwater runoff from the sperts facility and future school. Ponding and drainage easements will be provided to the City with the subdivision. Landscaping plans showing berming and landscaping to shield impact of structure along north and east boundaries. Provide fire lanes adjacent to structure. jum. 4 m CtTt OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION mm mm mm ^m ^m ^m ^m ^m tmm mm mm mm mm mm mm mtm ov mm mm mm mm mm 4 PROPERTY LOCATION -# n^L VI -* r. t:’YCr C'CNO .ItilEClO'^Ill Site Address Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) _ _ __ Please check one - Property _ _ abstract or 2 7 1992 torrens? Attach legal description to application APPLICANT Name C^f ^Cih Phone (home) I ^^*3*7 Phone (work)3H2- G?^3C> Address ;3\Q-0 />_ _ _ City: Q/c!)-O ^/V^ Zips.:£52^LL OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone ^ncr.’i) Phone (work) Address:City;.Zips (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size :‘r, ted Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land . * Mym: m Present Use (check) cm OF oRomAcres Total, all parcels ncpiQC 13502000^^ ^ ^ Residential; no. of units OJ OtH 2Qi-,w ether (specify) LHEiR TL 200,00 f. YOU r\l % Present Zoning District H244160 cool m T05:i' 06/09/9. PROPOSAL lik Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Ntimber of Building Sites: •> •. ■■ irffl Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Units per Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) > nr TifilWitiOiI ^ -- »>>> MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PR^IMINARY APPLICATION . , 1, Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A—603 Govt Center 348-3271). As an addendum to this applicationr please attach a separate list of any other*Tpersons you wish notified of this application. 2. 3. 4. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete• Zoning Official's Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Payment of fees (park feesr filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FEES f.y Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class Til & all non-residential) $200.00 300.00 300.00 325.00 + 25.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering chargis) 175.00 Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application 150.00 100.00 The applicant hereby agrees to provide all Information required or requested by the..„Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning CommissionlmjLCoiincil necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay a/ll'addi.tional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature Date Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ■ 7*. ______“1' r.: ” • 'ifU : IX' i' •' i;; i m la P^W ^;v■•v:v";•^^Vi.^':^^^^mm-msmmMm 'sisl mmm ■||M Kii ira KK-: :■ tt'iW: V*.;.vJil > .-•las fciTilWn O R O N O SCHOOL 685 Old Crystal Bay Road P.O. Box 46 Long Lake, Minnesota 55356-0046 (612) 473-7313 Fax (612) 473-1477 ct 278 June 3, 1992 U ■ •*v*’n ;r f Neal J. Lawson Ass’t. to the Superintendent ii ii srar ig Administrator 55323-0066 .;■ * • mir' ■■ ■ ‘•■‘f ■■'■ m mm. 'r;!;/. ry.^;: mW liS mm le conversation this morning in regard to the Subdivision iated by the Orono Area Sports Facilities Inc., the has been advised by our legal counsel that we should not ition until the District has approved the sketch plan, opinion that the option to purchase agreement for the lompleted before we sign the application. not our intention to delay the Orono Area Sports in completing the process required. The District would e City of Orono reviewing the sketch plan submitted by :;vv ^• here are any questions. iS ■: j l»w nip^ wmm'■X'r'. Wiis mymM n m • V fe-,4 V -J i.V'* rnmmm I- i ^ - A.s^m '•:f> -;v.i 4 ', ■:■ 5 mm % wmmim . Independence —Long Lake—Maple Plain—Medina —Minnetonka Beach—Orono An Equal Opportunity Employer Recyclable Paper m r‘ • • >v. ^ •••■♦ '■ «;)V*m li-.rA: CITT OF ORONO - NOTICE ¥ Lr. The Planning Commission of the City of Orono will hold a Public Information meeting on June 15, 1992 at 8:00 p.m. for the purpose of reviewing a sketch plan submitted by the Orono Area Sports Facilities, Inc. (hereinafter O.A.S.F.I.) that proposes an indoor and outdoor ice hockey arena on pjfoperty owned by the Orono School District. The subject property consists of 40 plus acres located at the southeast quadrant of the intersection of 6th Avenue North and Old Crystal Bay Road — refer to location map on rear of this page. m The parcel to be acquired by O.A.S.F.I. is approximately 5 acres in area and is located at the northeast corner of the property with direct access proposed at 6th Avenue North. The indoor rink is shown at 140'x240' and the outdoor rink at 85'x200*. Detailed site plans are available at the City offices for review. The City offices are open 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. Your written comments are encouraged. If residents have any questions, please contact Jeanne Mabusth (473-7357). l'-f«’iJi JeanjJe A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Adminrstrator : % : ry'. . j , *7 • A . . . . . Property Owners list for the proposed mi 1 • 28-118-23 32 0013 Henn Co Park Reserve Dist 3800 Co Rd No 24 fe Maple Plain, MN 55359 1: M, 1'3 ^ - 28-118- 23 32 0003 Francis M Johnson 3060 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356P- F E Buschbom 1150 Homestead Trail Long Lake, MN 55356 4 -28-118-23 32 0002 Floyd E Buschbom 1150 Homestead Trail Long Lake, MN 55356 5 - kV " ■ V I: 28-118-23 31 0001 Louise M Otten P.O. Box 117 Long Lake, MN 55356 w 6 - U 28-118-23 42 0002 John Lein 2700 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 7 - t" i’-'f' 28-118-23 42 0003 Thomas P Carroll 2600 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 8 -28-118-23 41.0005 Thomas P Carroll 2600 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 9 - u- 28-118-23 41 0004 Diane M Erichsen 2500 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 10 J2L:'«P < 28-118- 23 41 0003 Steven J Bouley 2450 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 I 11 - 28-118-23 41 0002 Michael J Schwarz 1125 Willow Drive N Long Lake, MN 55356 M 28-118-23 32 0006 Henry & Nancy Brantingham 3185 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 mm Ice Arena located on Sixth Ave N'. 13 ■28-118-23 32 0007 Benedict & Denise Young 3105 6th Ave N Lona Lake, MN 55356 14 -28-118-23 32 0008 John & Barbara Ryder 3045 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 15 -28-118-23 32 0009 Jeffrey Eccles 3025 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 ^L.waaAi 16 -28-118-23 31 0004 James Swanson 2995 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 17 -28-118-23 31 0008 Gary Larson 3085 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 18 -28-118-23 31 0005 Michael & Jo Ellen Wahlig 2945 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 19 -28-118-23 31 0006 Roger Zeeb 2905 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 20 -28-118-23 31 0007 H Robert Glavas Jr 2885 6th Ave N Long Lake, MN 55356 21 -28-118-23 31 0002 School Dist #278 685 Old Crystal Bay Road N Long Lake, MN 55356 22 -28-118-23 42 0005 Albin Thies 1442 Homestead Trail Long Lake, MN 55356 23 -28-118-23 42 0006 School Dist #278 685 Old Crystal Bay Rd N Long Lake, MN 55356 24 -28-118-23 44 0001 Orono Center Properties c/o Reiersgord Law Firm 4945 Halifax Ave S Suite 7 Edina, MN 55424 I ^i J ft r7^ Property Owners list for the proposed Ice Arena located on Sixth Ave N 36 - /'J 25 - 28-118-23 33 0014 Michael & Laurel Awes 3175 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 26 - 28-118 23 33 0015 James & Penelope Grabek 3050 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 28-118-23 33 0012 Stanley Stroup 3155 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 28-118-23 33 0017 James & Cynthia Kinney 3145 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 28-118-23 33 0016 Willicun Lurton 3135 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 . \ '. 28-118-23 33 0010 Gary Larson 3085 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 31 -28-118-23 33 0008 John & Susanne Koob 3065 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 32 -28-118-23 33 0003 School Dist #278 685 Old Crystal Bay Road N Long Lake, MN S5356 33 - 34 - 28-118-23 33 0001 School Dist #278 685 Old Crystal Bay Road N Long Lake, MN 55356 28-118- 23 34 0002 James & Penelope Grabek 3050 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 35 -28-118-23 34 0001 School Dist #278 685 Old Crystal Bay Road N Long Lake, MN 55356 28-118-23 43 0006 Albin Thies 1442 Homestead Trail Long Lake, MN 55356 37 -28-118-23 43 0007 School Dist #278 685 Old Crystal Bay Road N Long Lake, MN 55356 38 -28-118-23 43 0008 School Dist #278 685 Old Crystal Bay Road N Long Lake, MN 55356 39 -28-118-23 43 0005 Orono Community Church 770 Old Crystal Bay Road N Long Lake, MN 55356 40 - 28-118-23 42 0004 Lou & Jean Beasley 1265 Maplewood Dr Long Lake, MN 55356 I ■trjrw > • • L Meeting on the sale or lease of School District land for an Ice Arena and/or Little Baseball Fields 8:00 a.m., Monday, March 30, 1992 Persons present: Ron Moorse - Orono City Manager John Gerhardson - Orono Public Works Director Mark Johnson - Athletic Association Ton Mich - Supt, Orono Schools Neal Lawson • Asst. Supt. Orono Schools The meeting was called by Dr. Mich to informally explain the school's position on the possible sale of land to the Athletic Association for ai ice arena and the possible lease of land to the City of Orono for baseball fields. Dr. Mich explained that the District had a compreh*’" ::lve plan developed for the approximately 50 acres of land being purchased by the District immediately across the street from the High School. The plan provides for an elementary school, related parking and necessary outside facilities. The plan also indicates approximately 10 acres of land in the north east corner of the property that would not be required for the development of this site. The District's current Intention is to offer for sale the north east most 5-6 acres of land to the Athletic Association for the future site of an ice arena. An option to purchase agreement is currently being drawn up by the District's legal counsel for this intent. The District is also willing to discuss the potential of a long term lease with the City of Orono for the east adjacent 4-5 acres of land for baseball fields. It is anticipated that the City will approach the District with its intent to lease the land in the near future. Dr. Mich indicated that the paramount use of the property indicated above is for the purpose of housing Orono school District students and the proposed elementary school, however the District is willing to sell/lease the property as indicated above, provided this did not in any way adversely impact the District's intended use of the property. It was also indicated that the land has been and is intended to be rented for farming and any restrictions on the use of the land for this farming season should be presented to the District immediately by the City of Orono or the Athletic Association, by NJL 3/31/92 i ■ yTisi 3 ' ,■.'■* MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 2, 1992 3750 BAYSIDE RD -- CONT. i '4 I i ■" -I‘"3 I ■.Kr Mabusth stated that the Burger property Is very flat along roadway, but further east the property gets very steep. the was moved by Vongries, seconded by Wilson, to recommend Incorporating a bike easement with the drainage and easement and to request cash payment for Park Dedication for th i subdivis or at 3750 Bayside Road. Ayes 6, nays 0. Mabusth suggested that the Commission review subdivision applications prior to the Planning Commission review. Gerhardson suggested a Park Commission representative attend the Planning Commission meetings at which a subdivision request Is reviewed. He noted he would send the Commission a copy of the Planning Commission agendas. (#8D) ORONO SPORTS ARENA Mabusth explained that the project is being proposed by the "Sports Recreational Facility Inc. Group". The Group Is 1° acquire at least a 5 acre parcel from the Orono School Distrct at the northeast corner of the property. There Is an '"9 P' road that goes through the middle of the property. She noted that Park Dedication of land or funds was net taken at the t me the property was divided to allow the School District ‘ I*® property. She stated the School District has asked that the Hockey Association pay for any dedication of land or funds for th s subdivision application She explained that sewer and water would need to be extended to the property. There are two accesses proposed to the site from County Road 6, but the City intends to approve only one access because of safety reasons. Che noted they are proposing both an Indoor and outdoor rink. Mabusth noted that it is the Park Commission’s duty to determine if land or money should be requested for Park Dedication. She noted that because of a rece..t bill, the Hockey Association will be exempt of taxes on the land. Wilson reminded them of their desire to extend a bike/hike trail along County Road 6. Chair Flint reported that the Commission could recommend the faking of approximately 4 acres of land for park dedication because of the acreage of the overall parcel. He stated that tral Iways County Road 6 and Old Crystal Bay Road would rrobably be under that a I lowed 4 acres. Mabusth reminded them that with the Shadowood plat, the bike trail was Incorporated within the drainage and utility easement. , ■ vV m ■M i % WTT '^'*r'r ' .■V --■»'w~' I*-' mm •X'i W^mWm liJ ' ri / y.. •"Sis________'i:-f^^<' •>,'.* /i' ‘.-' ' • ' * I'ft? MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 2, 1992 ORONO SPORTS ARENA - CONT. Ferhardson stated that the City will receive a 10’ wide drainage -and utility easement along the perimeters of the property, which could be used also for the bike trail. Mabusth reviewed that the ball fields are shown to the west of the proposed hockey arena site. Chair Flint reiterated that the bail fields were o/lginally proposed to bo under a joint powers agreement. He felt that following the drainage and utility easement alorg County Road 6 may not be the most Idea location. Mabusth said that the bike path could be along the interior platted roadway. She noted that the Commission should determlne what they wish to do with the land In terms of open space and park to development. She reviewed that the School District hao determined a location within the parcel for a lUture elementary school and Informal ball fields. Use asked about the proposed timing for the development of the property. Mabusth understood that the Group wished to start building the Spring of 1993 to be completed by Fall of 1993. Gerhardson reviewed the plan submitted by tho County for the bike trail along Old Crystal Bay Road. He noted that In some areas a 30’ wide easement Is requested for the trail In order to allow separation between the roadway and the trail. Wilson felt that It is more appealing to separate the tralI from the roadway and felt they should request the additional easement. Chair Flint noted that In some areas along County Road 6 the utility easement goes through a wooded area. Gerhardson noted that the feasibility study for the tralI along 01d Crystal Bay Road will address the issues related to both options proposed. Chair Flint noted that there are very deep ditches along County Road 6 and felt the trail may need to be further In on the property to avoid these areas. Bradley asked If they would be dealing with both the School District and the Hockey Association for land dedication. fmmmm I ■ / .-'i ife-o W>V ■ '••^7 -p ■ - ^ MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 2, 19S2 ORONO SPORTS ARENA - CONT. Mabusth explained that they would be dealing with the School District as the owner of the land, but the Hockey Association would file the conditional use permit for the proposed hockey arena and would be required by the School District to pay for any land or money dedication. -•■‘t McMillan asked if there would be additional lots parceled off with the subdivision application. m Mabusth explained that an existing platted Interior roadway creates land divisions. She Is aware of three different parcels that would be created with the subdivision. ' - Chair Flint explained that they have decided to request easements for bike trails In lieu of land dedication to allow the owner of the property to use tne easement area for required land area and required setbacks. 1 Bradley asked if the Ordinance permits the acquisition of land through an easement and still require payment for park dedication. V’'m Chair Flint clarified that the Ordinance refers to the acquisition of land as “an interest in the land". Mabusth explained that In previous subdivisions, the City has required an additional 10’ wide easement for future bike trails. Chair Flint stated the reason for not requiring the total 4 acres for park land Is the nature of the development. He noted he would like to see the proposed trails drawn on the plans. Mabusth said the developer should stake the location of the proposed trail along County Road 6 at the different setbacks to allow the Commission to review the area. Chair Flint stated there are four aspects of the recommendation: 1. North/south trail following County Road Option A; 2. East/west trail south of the County Road 6 utility easement; 3. Bike trail to follow the Interior roadway; and 4. Joint powers agreement regarding the baseball field west of the proposed hockey arena. l' , :■ 11 m w •>-. .1 v<;" ti«£:' W‘VV^,. ^•.. '.'.• .'3- ■■-%U wif ^ ■■ . ■ si»<- j ’. • ■ V*.: MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 2, 1992 ORONO SPORTS ARENA - CONT. Vongries felt that a bike path along both County Road 6 and the ^ Interior roadway may not be necessary and may destroy any possibility of future development of the property. He felt that everyone was being very conciliatory towards the Hockey Assoc I at I on. Mabusth disagreed and stated that the City did not feel that was the most desireable location for the hockey arena and even the Hockey Ascoclatlon felt that way. Wilson asked If the Interior roadway will continue through the property to the east when developed. Chair Flint said that If there is an Interior roadway there ought to be a trail easement along it as it Is a safer place for a trail than along the County Road. Bradley asked If the easement along the Interior roadway would be an additional 10’ width. He stated that It would be logical to assume the Interior roadway would be a low-speed road and 11 may be possible for It to exist with an extended shoulder for a bike trail. He asked if the access road off County Road 6 to the hockey site would be considered for extension to the frontage road along Highway 12. Mabusth felt that probably would not happen because of extensive wetlands, but explained that the Comprehensive Plan encourages an east/west road linking Old Crystal Bay Road to Willow Drive. Wilson stated that It was hard to determine at this point whether both trails would be necessary, but felt they should retain the option. Vongries felt that emphasis should be placed on the ball fields. It was moved by Bradley, seconded by Wilson, to recommend the following: „ ^ *1. North/south trail following County Road Option A; f ' •t..‘.r\-*V .mms:rmsr 2. East/west trail south of the County Road 6 utility easement; 'V mmmr 3. BiKe trail to follow the Interior roadway; and 4. Joint powers agreement regarding the basebal I field west of the proposed hockey arena. Vi Ayes 6, nays 0. w f , ‘ * r*- • ■ I* 1 , ^ w-'IW - HENN CTY PUBl.TC WORKS TEL No .612-930-2513 Mcu 28.92 15:43 No .007 P.02 (S '0%i ' m ?i'-.f. HENNEPIN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 PHONE: (612)930-2500 FAX (612)930-2513 TDD: (612) 930-2696 ,A.. April 27, 1992 ■ - •.*■^-4 Jftarns Mabuith Piinning and Zoning Dept. City of Orono P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 5.'J323 Pe: proposed Athletic Site, Southeast Quadrant CSAH 6 at Old Crystal Bay Road Jeanne: IPr AS we discussed during our on«s1te review. Hennepin County would prefer tMt .11 iccM. to thS aoov. .n. b. V1. Old Cry.t.1 Bay Road. Howavar If this recommendatlan Is deemed Impractical by the City, then one entrance onto Co:nty State Aid Highway (CSAH) 6 would be permitted, subject to the follnwlng conditions In preferential order: '.i ,vV si’' imym '■ "«# - A clty-street-type entrance with full auxiliary lanes (westbound bypass, eastbound right turn), serving Internal street system, located at the east property line. - A parking lot driveway similar to the above, with a westbound bypass lane^located within 300 feet of the east property line. Anv access to CSAH 6 should be between 40- and 52-feet wide, at least 100 feet mto the site, careful attention should also be paid to internal circulation, parking, and drop-off service areas. Our Initial contact was Del Erickson, architect for the Ice arena group. We all should maintain close contact to ensure the best product for the site and the rooterIng public. Please call with any further questions or discussion. ' -I David K. Zetterstroro Entrance Permit Coordinator DKZ:mvr cc: Del Erickson. Architect HENNEPIN COUNTY ir>fK/ 1' i‘T' V'U •J-. TO:Jeanne A. Mabusti / Building & Zoning Administrator FROM:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE: SUBJECT: May 29, 1992 #1738, Orono Arena Sports Facility Per your May 27th memo, the following comments are offered: 1.The Orono Comprehensive Plan indicates single family uses for this property. The School's purchase of the large tract, while not in total conflict with the Comp Plan since school's are a conditional use in RR-IB, still results in uses not really contemplated when the Comp Plan Amendment No. 2 was formulated. Now, going one step further and creating what essentially is a commercial appearing sports facility generating traffic at all hours of the day and late into the night, is probably not what the neighbors to the north were led to believe would happen with this property. This area is within the MUSA boundary and therefore can be served with sewer. Although the Comprehensive Plan surmised that this would develop at a 2 acre residential density, the high water tables resulted in the entire area south of County Road 6 between Old Crystal Bay and Willow be included within the MUSA for future sewer. w ■ -*■ X ‘ r Glenn Cook will have to advise regarding the need to extend the municipal sewer system. Will this development have any Impact in forcing an early need to construct the sewer interceptor that eventually is needed to bypass existing Long Lake mains? 4. •V ^ This site has no designated wetlands, and is not within the Shoreland Overlay District. F M chr m t. jf. Ml Id WJ: mm - o '-: Z ■ < h m 'N ,T> "fctirrw ■■ ^' n r?! &-i V . r. i--v4- ' * {a.'^:P&- ■^t. ■4- TO: PROM: DATE: RE: Jeanne A. Mabu.sth, Building & Zoning Administrator Lyle Oman, Building Official June 10, 1992 Orono Hockey Area I have completed a preliminary building and fire code review of the proposed Orono Hockey Area. The following items should be noted: ;-r' Building would foe classified as an A-2,1 occupancy. Min. type of construction - Type V one hour. Allowable area - O.K. Preliminary exiting review reveals some fine tuning is needed. Automatic fire sprinkler system and fire hydrants required. Fire apparatus access O.K. BuiJrling must be provided with City sewer and water - approximately 20 SAC units. Building must be fully accessible to handicap persons. Elevator required for mezzanine level by State Building Code and Federal Americans with Disabilities Act. II H r’ .mm '^r:w.:r^riTTTi 'v-'. >1 -r. '' "S ■'M' ".if i-Sli- iM0 'N ' - "i ■■■. . -V . i %r ^ N V m.K mmim ; V j •\.K; .7 ; A-/ ^ .. - *» * :z7i lAi rttfti inma r ?i I , ■ nnnnirifTi lirinh i ifnii ii TT •t. M '<^m WW-- t':Ai ^■iMm m M Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Cto G BonesL'OO P£ JtoOert W ®E * Joseph C Aroe^ iL PE Mjrvin L Sofvjia. P£. £ -uf^. ?£ Gienn * Coc«. PE Thomas E No>«. PE RoOen G Schun<^ PE. Sos^ M Ebeflex C P^ •5emof C0hS4j*»nc Engineers & Architects June 10, 1992 Howard A SjnfQfd PE Wn A Go'Oon PE flbcen P PV^Yfie. PE Pcna«3 W ?cs»f. PE Dawtd O Loswa. PE Rooen C Pusse< A lA Jerry A Bourdon. PE KMt% A Hanson PE ^scnaei T Rauimann PE Ted K FiHd. PE Thorrias ff AndfflOh A lA Oonaid C BurgaPX. PE Thomas E Angus. PE Gary f Pytandef PE ;smae! Maroner. PE. Mcnae* P Rau. PE /•gres M Pmg. A fC P Thomas W Petenon. PE VchjcJ C Lynch PE Janes *. Maiand. PE. Jeny 0 Pmxn, PE. Kenneth P Anderson. FE Mart R Rofs. PE A Sect PE' Gary W. Monen PE. Oarwei i Edgerroa FE. PhifcpJ Carvven PE Mart O vva%s. PE Maes a Jensen PE. L Phiinp Gravel «. PE Karen L Wiemfft, FE. f Todd Foster. PE. Keen R vapp PE. Shawn O Gustahoa PE CecAo Oirvief PE. Chariei A Enctson Leo M Paweisky Harlan M Olion iames F Engefsardt Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator Cit> of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 J Re: Orono Arena Sports Facility Sketch Plan Review #1738 Our File No. 139-1738 , jUN 11 1992 Dear Jeanne: We have reviewed the sketch plan and supporting documents submitted for the Orono Arena Sports Facility. Our brief overview of the facility was concentrated on the engineering issues related to sewer and water service, access roads, stormwater drainage and aesthetic issues due to the adjacent residential zoned property. The sanitary sewer can only be served by connecting to the existing sanitary sewer manhole and 8" VCP sewer, along the east side of Old Crystal Bay Road, approximately 800 feet south of the future School Drive. Due to the minimal elevation differential between the proposed site and the existing sanitary sewer, a grinder pump station will be required to service the sports facility. (The future school may be served by a gravity sewer). A forcemain would then be constructed from tl.e grinder pump station to the existing sanitary sewer manhole. The number of sewer units and the «ewci and water utility connection charges will need to be determined for both the sports facility and the future school. The sports facility site is 5.35 acres and the remaining school property is approximately 44 acres. The water service can be pi :vidf ’ by connecting to the existing* 8" CIP water main along the west side of Old Crystal Bay Road or to the recently con.stnicted 16" DIP water man near the City elevated water reservoir site. It should be noted that both connections will be required at some time to create a water main loop that will provide adequate fire protection flows/ceverage and a more reliabie system for the area. In the future, the City shoul.i extend the watei main to the east and north where a connection can be made to the City of Medina’s water syitem. This connection would be a tremendous improvement in the water systems of both cities. Wc would recommend that both the sanitary sewer forcemain and the water main be constructed to follow the proposed School Drive alignment. The forcemain and water main should then be extended north to the sports facility at right angles to this alignment. The Hennepin County Department of Public Works has required that only one street access be permitted onto County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 6. ITie street access would require the 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 Kki&a .. V,. ■ ■ rr- f,' ; I yy&rTsiti *■ ^f.• • ■" ' %■ IP'^‘m,'!S-,r v: v !\ti ’f 'V'■!;,■m m fi . / :.ir;'i V ' !v Jt: .f • r \ I-' ■ L ;i - -4mm1 construction of a westbound bypass lane and an eastbound right turn lane on CSAH 6 to facilitate adequate trafGc patterns. The access street should be constructed adjacent to or centered on the east property line of the site. The sports facility should be required to provide a 60 foot wide right-of-way along the east property line. If the road is to be centered on the east property line, 30 feet of property should be purchased by the sports facility from owner of the adjacent property, together with 30 feet of the sports facility site, to be used as right-of-way. We recommend that the access road be constructed 42 feet wide, from face to face of B618 concrete curb and gutter. This width will allow a left turn lane onto CSAH 6. The road could be narrowed to 32 feet wide, south of the left turn lane. The access road should be constructed to the south line of the facility site v/ith a 50 foot radius cul-de-sac at the end. When the school property devel.jps, they should be required to construct School Drive to the east and connect to the access road, providing a through street for the area. TTie driveway from the sports facility parking lot to the access road should be a minimum of 100 feet south of the proposed right turn lane on CSAH 6. The drainage for the site runs northwesterly to the intersection of Old Crystal Bay Road and CSAH 6, by means of an existing ravine that traverses the site. The drainage eventually reaches Katrina Lake which is within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. A stormwater detention pond should be designed uoth for storage capacity and phosphorus removal for the stormwater runoff of the sports facility and future school. Ponding and drainage easements should be provided to the City. The property north and east of the proposed sports facility is zoned for residential development. Parking areas for public recreation areas such as the proposed sports facility and adjacent playfields and ball fields are known to create numerous inconveniences to such residential properties. With issues such as noise and aesthetics in mind, we recommend that the parking areas be located to the west and south of the sports facility. The sports facility would be moved north ana east of the proposed location to accommodate this pa^ king lot shift. The parking lots would then be located in a more convenient area for the people using the playfields and ball fields. The residential property could be buffered from the sports facility by installing berms and landscaping along the north and east property lines. We hope this engineering overview will be of use to the City Council and City Planning Commission with their review of the proposed development. We would be pleased to meet with the City Staff at their convemence, to discuss the above review and recommendations. Please contact me or Glenn Cook at this ofBce it you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, LNC Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. SDG:dh ■I d 5. h. V% V*^ V .4-1# k:'?- W* AND PRIOR TAXES PAID 5486394 ten. OF wramr us ft neuc Kfiotos TRANSFER ENTERED ^.. V 0£C It DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FOR THE HOtNCMN C:^ T~^Wty PLAT or ORONO SCHOOL EXPANSION (Name of Development) ;v INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278 (ORONO) (Name of Developer) CITJ OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Of, THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered Into thia day November , 1988, by and between the City of Orono, a (nI.v k> a ^ • municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter called "City"), and Independent School District Ho. 278 (Orono), an independent sc.'iool district and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, {hereinafter called "Developer”), ita agents, successors and assigns. WITNESSETH: e WHEREAS, the Developer ie the buyer of the Property • -i *•><* 't # hereinafter defined pursuant to that certain purchaae^agreetsen dated June 2, 1988, as asMndad by that certain .First Amendment I irchsse/Agreement;;dated .September ^2S,#1988|<eo 1 leetieely»| 'Purcbaae;_Agreement-). \ WHEREAS, .Albin Tbiea arud Arlene Thies,' aha, Albin F. *’a4 ^ ■ • ■*r Thies and Arlene L. Tbiea, respectively, husband and wife, anf Sidney B. Pbillipa and Ruth L. Phillipa, formerly known as Rut L. Tbiea, "espertively, hurband and wife (collectively, th< 5^1 . Page 1 of 18 m * M ^ *V e « e »>> ♦ «# ; .X ':;pi-.. ^ V.^V V.LS 'SSPijr k-: -t- L-l-' <* ^■'- V.a-; •Thiea and PbllUps-), are the sallera pursuant to tha Purchaaa Agreement and are the present owners in fee simple absolute of the Property. WHEREAS, upon the closing of the transaction contemplated in« and subject to the terms and conditions of, the Purchase Agreement, Thles and Phillips shall grant and warrant to the Developer (a) fee simple absolute title in and to that portion of the Property which will be legally described a» Lot 2, Block 2, and Outlet A, Orono School Expansion, according to the plat thereof to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "Plat**) and (b) a leasehold interest in i-ot 1, Block 2, and Locs 1 and 2, Block 1, of the Plat, together with an option to purchase fee simple absolute title in and to said Lot 1, Block 2, and Lots 1 and 2, B)ock 1. WHEREAS, the City Council has granted approval for the Plat on the condition that the Developer, with the consent of , ^ -.}?. • j % - < the Thiea and Phil’'ps, enter into this Agreement^to^pw the terms and conditions upon^which theOeveloper'shall :^MobligatedVto install cettainlpublic^roadway-and .utlliti^ improveawnts' hereinafter described on the tem and con< fj , -r .-v ; r liiprov hereinafter set forth. , a vOiEXEAS, the City Council has granted approval of the Plat on the condition that the Developer will grantto the City Page 2 of 16 m mrn»m - 4=^ -^V .* i { i ( tji \*^ *' ’ *• >✓» ^ •«/•■«• , *t ' ’»XrV^- V . *rft»» ■•..1 IC'; !>. # •n eascnant ("Easement") in the form attached hereto as Exhibit JWor public roadway and utility purposes over, under and across said Outlot A. NOW, THEREFORE, In consideration of the Property and the mutual proalaas and conditions hereinafter contained. It is hereby agreed as follows; ^J^PPRfty PgacriptipfiL The real property ("Property") is located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, and is presently described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, CRYSTAL CREST, according to the recorded plat thereof; and that part of Lot 2. lying east of the west 642.00 feet thereof. Block 1, CRYSTAL CREST, according to the recorded plat thereof. a • Condition Preced^nh ^p Conatrii^Hnn ahall not permit or require the use of Outlot A for public or private roadway or utility purposes without the prior written consent of the Developer, which consent shall be at Developer’s sole discretion, and ahall not have the right to construct 'Pi ■C' - - iSi : \ i-War" ‘ ♦ ♦ - ln.t.n or to to construct or install soy iaq^rovements /or^pubiio^ ^Pj^^rlvute-toadway or utility purposes (colle^aJl?;^- • \ -Xi^rovemeMts-) over, under and serosa said Outlot A, unless (a) the Developer fails to acquire fee ^ "mlX -h rt ' Page 3 of 16 s». V. ) \ - * >• a ^ me rmm >• .. ^ it- * i ' - , . r • -.n VI I ‘ *A I ^ ' ♦ ' r‘ limpla absolut* title to Lot I, Block 3, and Lota 1 and 2, Block I, of the Plat on or prior to the eleventh (11th) anniveraary date of the day and year flrat above written and to make a request for combination pursuant to Section 2.5; or (b) the Developer or the Thiee and Phillips or their heirs, representatives or assiqns. Develops, as such term is hereinafter specifically defined, all or portions of the Property within such eleven (ll)-year period. The terms and conditions of this Section 2.1 shall control and the location of said Outlet A. as shown on the Plot, shall not be changed or otherwise affected notwithstanding any future development of the land located east of the Property. The Developer shall not be obligated to change or otherwise affect the location Of said Outlot A or to construct or Install any Improvements, except upon the occurrence of the contingencies set forth in Section 2.1(a) or (b), notwithstanding any request or demand by any developer ■,1 \X\ •i.. «». Ot p,„o„ h.,ln, , I,,.1 or .«uU.bU the lani located east of the Property. v'; ,.ii * •videncs that Develoeer ■haii »...__ _ _. . . ’4^>i ' ' . • ui> r/i. «id.iic. that Dovolopor .h.U h.v. .equltad f.o ,l»pU - .b.0lut. tltl. to Lot 1, .uck I. ,„a lot. I ,„d 2, „oob ‘ 1. o« tlo M.t. th. Oo..lop.f. toeordln, .( , dMd(.> to •oet lot. fro. to. TW., ,nd Phillip, or th.lr holr., »pro..ot.tlv.. or ...1,.., .. ,r.ntor. to th. O..olop.t. as grantee, shall be conclusive evidence that the Pege 4 of li 1^, *'7**;* % % r..!*1SP ' 'W: ^Hr '.r .a ■ mc- il . '--i j - - : . f A . .P1*I»I . • » I* ■•«•*«•!• iLi-^ M r ^L . • ’Tj ti., c;*&-v. • 5iB^ V * ^ V. . > * • I Mh > r< ^ • 5 V •: »*“ • L'Zr‘ 1*1 ««VA -ll« *' ' i i i ‘^V fcv. ^•=r ‘ < ^ * " • --V ' . ♦ ^r; :■ -*t S^tkLXj^^-. - *-VT^'.;-;,.'W: ■ •J2* ^ X • *- V :*>2 ■ ■'^’V.- ' ,ZMm -;:I, ' »4 r-.'W? l•l•l€•k i -ill - i;.- • ■-.f#*' *\ •- k:. •■ IfllfH*.1^ . [‘■■ViM ■ ■■■^ m •.'/»-7-■ • V v;’ \ ’ ’ •*' i't ’|8pp»i-i ■t-'' 'fe-i ■ '•• M ■ ■ •■^' • ■-V:- .^.-v ' ■ • i ■ '■ i- :' ’'■'•< ,..■ ''^^r, ■ ■ ' ^ >; >^i V • ^ ^ Mi \ i- • * ••* 4 * %K *t I./P /AV-. rr"'’* > > M / ;V‘ /:.c r.. if- coaplvtion of tb« ZmprovtMnts. Th« l«tt«r of crodit shall •xpiro no soonor thsn six nontha aftor tho Complatioo Dato« or a dato roasonably agroad upon by tho City and tho Oovalopor« whichovor In latoi. Upon ptrformanco by tho Oovolopor of tho toras of this Agrooaent, tho City will reloaac to the Oovolopor ouch lottor of crodit aa and whon roquirod to ao do by tho torma of this Agroofliont* 6 a FmmB and g^panaiigi ? a 6.1 Tho City horoby waivos tho park foos and road ^•oa rolatod to tho Plat and tho Proporty until such 0 ^ tlno. If and whan, all or portions of tha Piopacty is t Dovolopad. 0 # % • t 6.2 If construction and inatanation of any Inprovamants ara raquirad undor this Agraanant, than tho Davelopar agrees to pay all City fees required per the 1 then current City Pee Schedule and further agrees conpletely to raimbursa tha City for all the variable additional ezpensea It reasonably incurs in regard to tho . . id review and approval of tho Improvoraonta, including without linitation, roasonablo’diroct City pVyroVl^^ond? ^***®®ablo overhead, coats sndifaas paid,to.consultonts*^^^' - • r 9HJQ •Vi- >: Vvr - - - - - - - - ^ ’’EtJOlutiQoa Qg City; Developer agcaas to bo bound by .'a*i tho provisions sot forth In all resolutions of tho City Council approving tho Plat. i> ;r* f S‘ - ; ■ i. P.Q. 10 oC 16 a ^ • _____* •• ^4. - • , ••••*• ‘ ^ '*• - '^ij ^ 6 I I.. ' r.* \ t # •. * XaprovMMiita furniabad purauant to thia Apraaaaot ahal horeby ara mada a part of this Agraamant by rafaranca •a if aat out berain in full. Placlalnwr hr CUyt it ia undaratood and ag tha City, the City Council, and tba aganta and aaploya< City shall not ba paraonally liabla or raaponsibla in i to tha Davalopar or Davalopar'a contractors, subcontra< ostarialMn, laborars, or any othar parson for any dabi damand, danagas, actions, or cauaaa of action of any kl charactar, arising out of or by reason of tha aaacutior Agraanant or tha parfornunca and coaplation of tha Impt unlasa caused by tha breach by the City of any of its obligations haraundar. MQ-td HarBlesa and Tndnmn4#4,-.^|^„. Tl,, Daval »hall indemnify and hold harmless the City, the City Co and tha aganta and amployaaa of tha City from and again claims, damages, losses or espansas, including attorney N Ik i 1 -• t ♦which the City, city Council nnC ngnnt end xvloy... oj ••y cufCni or lor which It uy bo hold llohlo^orloii^J r - / * , 'r* 'rM. fWi • WVo^ ‘ oubeontroetoro, ucopt to tlw oxtont ctuiod by thl b»t «• «‘»li««tiona haraundar or tortious »c • oaission of tha City, r>: 0 * • ^ %. y ' . ot 4 Faga 12 of 16 f •.»s' * %• ?*Vv3 9 IJXiTmi p < oi» ‘• V* J < iiO - r 1^9 '■-.■■i •. 0. . ■ W t '-4" y >,? • •/>i ■ ^ -mad. » -St ■*A «« r A EASEMENT AGREEMENT 0«ceab«r TSai f* *"** antered Into this 2nd day of an independent school district and political and*thi*ci?v°«#^* Minnesota (the "School DistricfK Ki Minnesota (^SS? A"!: “annepln County, grant to thJ^CitJ'bJ^iJ?T* ‘«quired that the School District forth. ^ ••••"•nt hereinafter set Dollar (tl**oo( ■consideration of One and no/lOOths .V access, road and utility purpose rmm A ^ k**r ' ^ sLw4:.w- wt usa on^ ov^r, undtr and aewhich eassMnt shall Include a full and free rlohi 'did .OatXotsA toJcoi>.tr5et.^Jill “d":5;i:s.“u ‘4^^'I^rovflMnt?' "d^dddddnc., operation and rapalr of tho •-ur'llr* W' f ■ ♦ ► ♦ >1 y a \ •»« .^ f - * • - t». r ^ * I shall be sttbjec?^^thi! iSitltiSM granted herein ‘ yr^ the plat of Orono School Expansion, dated Nweeber inSisf V - V ■adarULOs _ i ••■ • -riU''- '55-‘J •a d^a J . a * IL- Vl—r - 'dfv i^.’l 'V,5 «U ' ’•a • 4 ai.-rk*. * • • . ■a ‘mi. W -r r ' o^.rT.«» - ^ •l'#V*C:r»i r»v*f«ifff« L*«*€*i«r*i • •r- •I H •> 9 •!• » i\iZ •9kwmm\ i^v;: iT • ,ir. . 1* = i-ii F- ■► rxoirrr h IV-- y V I I’ 3 >r 'i ! r :a--. • >• -■ • >' * >>- y9l« t * • -■ * 'V- ^ ' rm- /vl V '.s * ••*’• “*"* '*” '“'*' .. . -----------" _ . ■ • " \ * *, ’ L » ■' ‘ Ti'oj-— • _ • » »J5* " > M.. •• • ' •,' ••• \'• ^ _.V_-!?- — 1 T~ --*—**^*‘"*^~^ ^-- *■!—■ * ***«. •.*. •_.,'1'«J’^ ' *. '• / * tt^j : >^-;-- .._ / ;i , ^ • v • . '•. .. . •; y.-; . ••45-. • . V •' '• '* * mm •.0%mt %» t-•s . • r j V \ ► > t* ’.' « .y X-' ^0 V \ :JT- ..TF ...V a N. .. s ». V > l’ V Ey V M. »r« if' lil||!il V. y.'j '• / / cnr?^ iSi if ^: •; viL -y^N / •5- ‘ •7r'^ ■ < > V \ / V V 4T ^ >|e I * \ I I../ _ si'/ Y ■:s ■-•i* rr . y i 9 U. r ■ 1 onofio Mue tcNocit t^«T»ct N». trt cnopfOi. I9HUPU *V*OOAt«.% ' .-■.'fr ' **" .*^1; - *-, •v •«• # •■ ^:yr-• I 1 •• :•’ VV t..7'4v '■ * - > T* • • f W I r^- 6 7 8 9 0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 04/15/92 IREVISOR J JMR/KJ CC^HF2940 W- (20) Real and personal property, including leasehold or other personal property interests, owned and operated by a corporation if more than 50 percent of the total voting power of the stock of the corporation is owned collectively by: (i) the board of regents of the University of Minnesota, (ii) the University of Minnesota Foundation, an organization exempt from federal income taxation under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended through December 31, 1990, and (iii) a corporation organized under chapter 317A, which by its articles of incorporation is prohibited from providing pecuniar] gain to any person or entity other than the regents of the University of Minnesota; which property is used primarily to manage or provide goods, services, or facilities utilizing or relating to large-scale advanced scientific computing resources to the regents of the University of Minnesota and others. (21) Wind energy conversion systems, as defined in section 216C.06, subdivision 12, installed after January 1, 1991, and used as an electric power source. (22) Containment tanks, cache basins, and that portion of the structure needed for the containment facility used.to confine agricultural chemicals as defined in section 18D,_qi^ subdivision 3. as required by the^ommissioner of agriculture under ch^pt0f 18B or 18C^ ^■<1 PhotovoU.lg d.vlc.a, as d.iin.d in article 8, section 1. InEClle.- i.n„.rv 1. 1992, and used to produc. or .tor. electric twwer. (24) Real and personal property owned and operated bv_a private, nonprofit corporation exempt from federal income ^ taxation pursuant to United States Code_,—tit_le_2£i_s Dri..».rllv used (or an ice .reno or ice rinl.. and tl..rUv for-Voutn .nd hi^^ <rhoal programs sec. 10. Hlnneiot. Statutes 1990, section 272.115, Is amended to read: 272.115 [CERTIFICATE OF VALUE; FILING.) subdivision 1. rveeot ss provided in subdivision whenever any teal estate is sold .„-or-efter-den=try-lt-i999T i.-■M m HF 4 , * ■ * 'A i:! ' •! i '■V r- . / • ■ , 1 - :■\ . V''V ^ r '.9 |L::: ■k l 'a-a' :» WF # 04/13/92 (REVISOR ) RJS/S? CCRHr2121 learning readiness aid for school districts. The formula shall • take inta consideration the number of oarticipatina eligible children in school districts, provide incentives to districts to conduct outreach activities, encourage all eligible children to participate> and provide adequate services to individual children based on each child*s needs. Sec. 26. (ICE ARENA LEVY.) (a) Each year, an independent school district ocerating and maintaining an ice arena, may Itw for the net operational costs of the ice arena. The lew may not exceed the net actual costs of operation of the arena for the previous year. Net actual costs are defined as operating costs less any operating revenues. (b) Any school district operating and maintaining an ice arena must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the office of monitoring in the department of education that the district will offer egual sports opportunities for male and female students to use its ice arena, particularly in areas of access to prime practice time, team support, and providing iur.ior varsxty and vounoer level teams for girls* ice sports and ice sports. offerings. 21 Sec. 27. [DEPARTMENT STUDY.] Subdivision 1. (WORK WITH DISTRICTS.] The department of education shall work with school districts to determine the required educational services and costs of the services needed to establish the allowances in sections 5 to 3._The department mav establish a representative sample of districts to include in the research. The department shall evaluate the inclu3iqn_qf revenue provided under Minnesota Statutes, sections 124.311,. 124.32, 124.332, 124.S73. and 124.574, in the allowance^;—T^ 30 31 deparement shall report to the education committees of legislature on the progress of the study on February 1 of 32 33 year Subd. 2. (INDEX.J The department shall evaluate and develop a cost differential index for each school district.—The index shall distinguish the prices and costs of resources needed to piovide Instructional services over which a local board may 112 « « mmmm mJl ✓ ff r mi ...V BL. ”'- •• '‘w • •- /, ’.V 'i 1 t it\I^ -* ■ CONTENTS AROIITECTS REPCHT TO ORONO AREA SPORTS FACILITY INC. FEASIBILITY STUDY for ORONO AREA SPORTS FACILITY , .V., ■ , •3 m A..''. •■ ,V! s-T M'y April 29, 1992 Comn. No. 9201 1 ' :'« ■' ■ r' I ' • • V . .. . i 4; -. ‘4 « . Is Table of Contents In troduc t ion Usage Projection m • Cost and Operations Siminary Program Summary 'K.y, i >v Construction Cost Estimate/Alternates « • Building Design Perspective View Site Plan y * • Floor Plans, Section, & Elevation School Property Aerial Photo School Property Plat Overall Site Layout/Master Plan Alternative Sites and Site Issues I Appendix Cost Estimate Breakdown Site Development Cost Alternatives Alternative Site Plans & Studies Memorandisns Soil Report ♦ Hennepin County Highway Access Page 5-8 Page 9-11 .y--' • '•••• '■4? Vr : • . Sheet 1 Page 12 Sheet 2 Page 13 Sheet 3 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Sheet 4 Page 17 ml^ Page 18 Included in Master Copy IBlI flllHlIflK:. m % ORONO ICE ARENA Comm. No. 9201 April 29, 1992 V.-^1 vr,- INTRODiJCTION i^^.. The enclosed report constitutes our analysis of a nulti-use.sports facility for the Orono area. This project is a follow-up to the 1990 s^dy for a multi-purpose recreation center on Old Crystal Bay Road. The .initial objective was to develop a ice skating facility on the northeast comer of school property they indicated could be available. A site area was determined .and negotiated with the school. Unresolved requirements are the sewer and water service. *'4 Over the past few months the project T<ras progressed thru site studies and meetings with the hockey boosters and sports facility committee to develop the enclosed program and design on the proposed site. Consideration and analysis of accornnodating park desires, little league fields, alternative sites, sewer and water, etc. has resulted in a number of site pl^s and site development cost estimates which are included in the appendix (master copies only).[9 Soil tests have been taken to determine the suitobility of the site for this use as well as site development costs. Discussions have been held with city and county officials regarding requirements for construction, parkii^, county road access and approval process. Some of the foregoing is included in the appendix (master copies only). The resultant concept and cost projections are presented.herewith for use as a basis of fund raising and negotiations and/or approval of the Orono area community. % Respectfully submitted DELANO ERICKSON ARCHITECTS Del Erickson, AIA Registration No. 7137 IWiSr-w . - ' DDE/se ismavi- HR i r - wmmm '■.v;.csimwmm F- i. -■ . '"Or*" 1*fj- V ■. ‘ -sVv • -.v-. - .-itS , 1. i;*;.» ;I--, i, „■ , . u USAGE PROJECTIONS OR(M) AREA SPORTS FACILipf Market Analysis & Potential Ice Usage Comm. No. 9201 •"V ' ■ ;>'■ ■ I''' ■•: The following sunmarizes our proje^'- 'rr'' regarding ice usage and potential markets we have investigated: • • Prime Ice Demands are during 24 weeks from mid October to end of March. On a daily schedule of 7 AM .to midnight there would be approximately 2^350 hours available.- Assuming an 80% efficiency of rental yields approximately 1,800 - 1,900 hours of marketable ice. ^ « • The breakdown of ice time by category for the above season is as follower 984 hrs ■■ ■ ■ r'-'^S ■%.' l&iii j-'* ’ »1.. Prime time 6PM to lUW weekdays - 430 7AM to 11PM Saturday - 312 Noon to 10 Ri Sunday - 192 10 game llig^ School schedule Net Prime Time .. High School Hockey afternoon School AM/RI phy ed (24 wks) Noon hour recreation/fitness Early morning/figure Early evening/hockey Sunday AM recreation/leagues Late hour leagues m (24) r r ; i 1 960 hrs 160 hrs 360 hrs 120 hrs 240 hrs 120 hrs 70 hrs 170 hrs 2,200 hrs V-..' m- ■y^ Rule of thumb for break even usage is lOhrs/day x 7 x 24 weeks - 1,680 hrs. . * - » i •• W'-Wly^ j-\ »v. _ r-=' 1. 1'* « t ‘“5,:t# mr USAGE PROJECTIONS (cont.) >, v' mz■y-^z4 The following list identifies potential users and projects amount of time; fOrono H.S. hockey High School hockey games Middle School Phy Ed Orono Hockey Associaticn Assume marketing of Pond Ice to others Wayzata Hockey Association . . figure Skating Club (needs program) Noon hour, open skating Mens leagues (5/wk @ 1 1/4) ice ¥‘TMli-' 150 hrs 25 hrs 200 hrs 525 hrs 525 hrs 125 hrs 120 hrs 150 hrs 1 ^ A '■ s • .. ' -V. X Total Potential Usage 1,820 hrs ‘ . .... • •■ The foregoing projections need to be confirmed.and commitments obtained where possible. .Impacts of other arenas in development stages must be considered, however, marketing of prime time hours is usually not a problem. Competition for ice time in the northwest suburban area exists v^th the following arenas and their respective distance (straight line) from the Orono School site; .n i i 1. Pond Arena, Mound 'ijHil 2. Delano Arena, Delano 3. Wayzata High School, Wayzata • • • 4. Minnetonka Arena, Minnetonka 5. Buffalo Arena, Buffalo 6. Osseo Arena, Buffalo 7. New Hope Arena, New Hope 8. Hopkins Arena, Hopkins Investigation and confirmation of above projections must be assigned and developed to finalize schedule and usage. .. iJMi I J.'. V. ^ K*. : V yfm m :.iS ■Hii .M •>--y u'*‘ Jfii wm . -.vV ••■■■.• -V- :. ■:i nmm 11 iKliii bM •hkfsAKt MM m PSP-:*:^':j| wS3i^ Hi: 4^ •lilil R:TiCil riii^ IM rir^i ••;:::':' •; ;^r‘V riTH^4-4^';'-rXr' .-, AV- Pmmrnm |MH»X:v :X: ^:..: ggK P‘5 ^ :, .•.; ' :•:. / ■•; •; v: •/■• ■ ••••V X-- ■<■> '••• '..• v-.'- V V V ; , :0 -X. E>v,. Eli^■tiftv^ ->l ixiA TIDOTk, .•^n»'f«L.- . •*.J F^r'-V-;:vt’’ • mmiiim ;m^ mm ^ : :;-^V 1 ...' ^■.::- ; fm. ppyi'mN }y''r X-'.A.> • V, X .; - ; V- .^*2 •4. W. -v s;^..V-cf'-': -X ym m • t-.' ’ I..; 4 ' m:--PROGRAM ORONO ICE AREWA Comm. No. 9201 Lf;T ■“f'fe • Program for design development based on input from committee and goals of the Hockey Association.I ■ ‘ .The following information will form the basis of the building design, understanding that some of the development may be future to allow phasing to fit the available budget based on fund raising. OBJECTIVE Hie primary charge is to provide an enclosed facility with an artificial skating rink which has space for future development of support facilities’, seating, and mprovements. Basic to the first phase is a durable, economical shell which is structurally capable :® of future additions, meets building code requirements and provides ^ as many amenities as budget will allcw. ' $ if' SITE ISSUES .. ■ ■ The site’orientation and configuration warrants access from the north on County Road 6. Constraints of setbacks, utility lines^ • • and required parking affects use of propierty for building location. a •* •' . '4^ Set backs on site are 100 feet front yard and yards abutting residential. The yards may be used for parking with minimum of 20 feet setback.1- city ordinance requires one parking space per four to six occupants ^depending on classification. Occupancy to be based on number of seats and/or floor usage per code. The west portion of site has a drainage swale and hill which could be leveled for ballfields. The east portion of site has proper elevation, however, the upper 3 to 4 feet of soil is composed of black dirt and silt which must be removed and backfilled for proper base under building. The subgrade has frost susceptible soil and therefore some protection must be utilized in design of ice rink base (ie sub floor heat). .t' t, • '?r I- Alternative plans will address concept of an arena building with shared parking and drive for little league ballfields. A fjture outdoor rink should be sited to a Ilev for interaction with arena (both Zamboni and people) and best orientation. -'Mm L;/ ' - ^ . ; ■ -rv' :'tr PROGRAM (cont.) Conm. No. 9201 BUILDING PROGRAM The following functions and their respective requirements are to be accommodated in the master plan for the arena: Flinction 200' X 30 meter Olympic rink surface with 24' radius comers with dasher boards and protective screen (preferably glass). Double gate for Zamboni, preferably in straight section. Players boxes and timer/ p)enalty boxes opposite from seating. Ice surface and ice making equipment should be based on 6 month operation and allow for other uses during down time. Spectator Area Approximately 1,000 seats in bleacher type stands which could be over dressing rooms or storage. Elevated seating at dasher boards for good visiblity. Team/Dressing Rooms Four rooms of capacity for 20 players (approximately 12' x 24’) with easy access to ice. Toilet and shower should be planned for joint use two rooms, although first phase may not include. Toilet/Shower (future) 2 at 150' sq ft m I Officials/First Aid Small room for game officials storage and changing with storage for first aid supplies. Zamboni Room Heated area for storage of machine, ice making and grooming equipment, nets, work bench, hot water heater, and snow melting if necessary. Room to have overhead door access to ice surface, outdoors, and future outside rink. Refrigeration/Mechanical Room Room near rink to house ice making equipment and building mechanical systems (ie heat reclaim). 19,000 sq ft PROGEIAM (cone.) Cornn. No. 9201 i 1'mw t.I BUILDING PROGRAM (cont.) Public Toilets Net Area 400 sq ft Men and women facilities to meet state code requirements for fixtures (30 s.f. per occupant for rinks = approx. 1,000 occupants) Women - 4 wc, 3 lavatories Men - 2 wc, 2 urinals, 3 lavatories r-. *v ' ■ ■i ■A 1 i'. . *5^ m 1 ■■n . i rS Concession Area 250 sq ft Space for preparation and selling of typical menu such as pop, popcorn, hot dogs, etc. provide approximately 20' of seeing counter, adjacent lockable storage room is desirable. Office and Control Area Central location with good visiblity and control of entrance and ice surface. Components should be arranged so one person can manage facility. Space for manager office, ticket sales, skate rental/ sharpening, pro shop, and general office. 200 sq ft v"* 4 Lobby 800 to 1, Area large enough for crowd control and heated lounge space with access to concessions, toilets and entrance. Club Room/Offices 1,400 to 3, Total Net Area Plan for future heated club/game room with vision of ice. Comfortable place for parents and spectators as well as offices/ storage for figure skating club, hockey association, etc. S torage General building storage as required for maintenance, team equipment, an«_ building furnishings. Using a 15% net to gross conversion factor for walk space and biilding construction 200 to 500 sq ft 30,650 to'32,750 sq ft 4,600 to 4,950 sq ft TOTAL GROSS AREA 35,250 to 37,700 ft (COTit.) Ccxnm. No. 9201 5 ^% FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIPS The uses in the building should be arranged to separate public from participant during games. The control area should be convenient to maintenance area^ however, does not have to be adjacent. A clear separation (ie barricade) between occupants and the Zamboni machine is desirable. Zamboni should be located to also serve outdoor rink (needs clean pathway "• could be combined with ice dumping area). • The entrance/lobby/seating relationship should be reasonably direct and under control of office area. An upper level, enclosed space with an overview of the skating rink is desirable and should be at least planned for future. The seating for spectators along side of rink is preferable to ends. Skaters access for team rooms, lounge, rink, toilets, and concessions requires skate tile flooring and concentration of these areas minimizes amount. The configuration and dimensions of the building to minimize construction costs may impact on the foregoing.relationships, however, long .term planning should take precedence over short term economics. .Analysis of a large shell to accommodate future interior development versus minimum building with future add on capabilities should be done. ■ ^ i • — aV ' '« ■ * *• r>>- d r ^ mT:\ a'^'^~ % W -X*' ^ >: a ' ■' X v' 'Vv.'. X V'v -'••*^ ^.......................................r’>^ V -^ARKINp^,—rtfSPACEB ,' • * )^V ^;IT~Ft~----!sf7 rf-. A. ■""T...........M' ^ / ^ 0 \ ^y''' -'y ♦TTB^ fy^^i \ jc^jkntorEKTy' 1 MliMOtMCMOHMICMlttCn ■COMM.0«T| »iv 4 tin ••n * ■'•-Jli m. «*ill_ ORONO ICE ARENA t; /• *■<« 4 *• • 'i! *11• # V/ Vt » •- I*. » 0T J<3 -I Ji r A y •iA* * •^v ^•* '.#» •uL- V* cr-. f- e- I* A •■x:.* •' i •Mkii -------- ppiW .vW-l-i r= ’■:ymwmM imi » --i H "v^xVv-. 1 m m ^mmm -V.^ ■■- : 'y--M m C’*V:; ^yki -K ’-yife El mM ‘ i •'••-A .- •.» / » f ‘ V . ‘Lf . ... •/, ; T.‘>«:liL^ ^S^’';fj'? i**-' :•' v; :•■;•■: I . fern i-f^ t .r-::^:;.v::: ♦•v.v " ‘V'f.- ^ ./•,* •• • : *i-li Wlif■ 'j«I.'’: i':' ;‘il ••’ w*;-:»* ' * :r •^' aliii^Ma J ■* .■ . vt:- ..;, ■*■.•^3 : ■' » i’ 1? ? ■ *w ni'^v'-'w . * . •- - f2V • '. ■ •**■.'*# ■■>'.• - ■|. : 1En^ * ^ ^ " • ^ I ' ' V * ' I: ;.Vi'v-.^. -c ^ r t T - Krair'., ■ > .1 . V. •P35;..‘.4S ••,••”'-.7 ■• n c'• • >7^1^ Iif* II : ■; ■ >v-! ,; ■';:/ V-. :' ■ /I.3v:rm umm iPRfl' :■.. -:vsif> - a a&ASJr-yi-:- - ■ f'-- -J. m.ISiHi yssi^iSsisiSi! ¥M ^UmI Mi mi i v^3J3^!^^rm m 'sm ra j:. • :•! • '^f. .■■■^.^ mm mm 4 (5)n- mt? -V' « l»v ' ■. * . • »' •• . iw hr^s . ... . /.v/v -v e ^ silifflS 0 ioiiiiiiiMPg g\ /• |j iteHi ••■r \v ■'• ^ \ :-': V ¥/Ni^.-ons. ^ ^ //'• N // y,'V v1 V ^ X \ . iAaEMEM^^ "1 *..v. V >.'■ 1 . V • m V0 >T^ '* *• .I \ V'S m V ^ „..' I ■ ^ N >• ;i \ \ y ’m^:m t;-'^;00;JB 1 fcv ’ •'KL'® ^ ^ • ' ii;'’^ ' \ '’ V \ \fM r" iSil mii kmn l^=: . • T; ‘.v'.'..*H'^':i r . - "^'0 • > - \ TO L4«. Wm!§?M t ar>«io »*CJHBW ^new^CTi C^ihA)LO “issui^rs »n.l:aUi2.«rc. « iHX K:"- •::v -.•v.veU.Vk'IJi ■■ "-iS V , . •• •.' « • • < .'^ i-S(fl?1?^ i^' ^■^'..^..7,- A- : •:, :v -n (NO ICE ARENA Conm. No. 9201 • * ALTERNATIVE SITES ti m-m A nuinbor of sitfis locatod between Highway 12 and County Road 6 and east of Old Crystal Bay Road were investigated as follcws: Northeast comer of school property (selected site) 5.35 acres - satisfies prograri - needs sewer & water Northwest comer of school propert>. (park proposal) Access problem, increased site development, school disfavor. * • Commercial site at Highway 12 & Old Crystal Bay Road 4.6 acre, 2 party, small site, high land cost. East of City Hall site 5.67 acre, road cost, poor soils, close sewer & water, high development costs. Southeast of City Hall site 5.17 acre on Highway 12,^ high land cost?, close sewer & water, low development cost, needs further investigation. a f ■viij ' \v, North of City Hall site . - Sg 3.0 acre, small site needs joint use of parking areas at school, church, and city. Close sewer & water, soil ?, needs approval of city. _he foregoing sites 1 and 6 are the most attractive. Site 1 has.high sa^^er and water cost. Site 6 is small and contingent on city approval. jt -m vV i •'* ..rV. • - m■ v • • • VZ' .'n:- i' .i - r%:- : A > •: :=v:'7 mi ritrtlmite.li nil r^-.e ----^ 12)05-0127 ITYROADB EVILLE.MN 55113 JiV ’mmV:'; “• * • •T-'V-J I • * V * V * *t;, ■ ^ . ■ j.-"'•■ '5!fe„ ^ ‘•oT /■; •. \ ^ m •• • *7 ■fi- -V: g|Ei*5i^^/a*»*;---»J ^'v..‘“>'- #• .si frp. . ^ S‘l'- .. •r,, ^,|ig A* »- ^^4*- / -4-' •ii* ____ V <►-•*- .... I' >■■ . ■ •>s‘ ■■“'i ■. ■ ■■. ./ mmm^M I i ■ .-. -;n. }-ix^ ‘•\ ■■ -i^x'.: ^fml ^p;,; I m , . V « V ‘.rr.-.>. ^-.^;..—J r.i.oi ■ „;. ^ ^-7- /2t.- Vf K’- .i'Ls? f'i; 3k r.: >n>T»- Pr. ^ W- “t s ' “* iS-.saK' - s " ry -v ; .-*9^- » m ^. V’ 'i''. vj »b ✓ if ‘r f i:>T>r! W.-/1 1*.^ •i-'A-.^'^.v' Srf./ < j», .1.^ 11 ti^ m>> rr-^-qmmd I r'Mw, 1 3lv''*T v-j(M3?r; rv:, • • Tr'/' ^ r-^ •- i’-*N P^l^mm V ‘ 5r r." V" ’i !V t^»f -*r.. , »* •iv ' ■■331^*’**L “ ,r WV . Y >7% a;;:;*''- te^i« >'{V»ji' ■ :’3-5 ’ 3 -H ' . ■ ■ \1 _f. c i • •"^;>?rJjp=:'.\‘ ___ 'A ' : > - i?'■;5.„«.Mr3-.. ^;l :. :: • ■'.'^l-^ejrJ 4 ^1 T?:<^ <• , * A •' ?:’*>M V-' / I fe ,* s*. •! f'.,• r • -U I I - ?••'? mmi-:miMsa=3 ’'^ ■, *• N, y \'i r ', f ppgf^S -v>i"' cie)^T O^E>l^ ko^ -S|S?i2t^ ■^AiCHurTt|’ ,# • $(D Oforr / ScG 6fet,TD/ f f .-p 5i . !.MimpmI ‘fc—jaifeci^ .W®4^5®C!^ 1.^Yni2^t Mii ■==p>tJl WJfetjL/ iti£hW I: Li.id.:t ! I Ife&a I a “m .i?ilis&2. •* < 4.?: jqsBf^a^jtoanA i^jiffoiiia Wa-^a?i224<Z laidlMli »0^ isjlisA^ iUZii.iJtL,.^^ 6teii/i6.tys __ e»is^-__ •Mexti-.. \Vw\ .. ^ uo^ . ilkiea^ ;R' i i "v^ ■• ^, w 4 k.i CC7 S2t? yiswV- i .%■' 91oeio I ' 23)as3 111 ? ; i * •“!------------------------- r —T 53a? fSQQS 4;^;a3. ♦ -:------- ! I I i i ! l0^-_ • . i i ~ T I • nil I f i t ^;:p 13^ iO&lZfT ■R>5T0X ^OOO M%6 I ■ r; -I- -— r ) , > I -1-1 tfc>8^ ; » » I ' i 1» 1 f 1 i (I i 1 ii ’ t ^ ^’ ^! * ''B^p\ SBSlpp^' lee t I mi^. l i r ifn 1' ■A'k'M r ■ X 'X/j2^i-ii^ - l‘/5 r 6cwA i‘ ■ --; . •• @16 loZi.- .,.-• \ \| U\ ..^.. / /. IllfdmK ------ > x^ -r^TTTTT —.—T0^^.A C i 'Dr:-TT^rrrrTj^3-]^ ‘ i .{ 4»\\y \. ■< / L. xAaO.i.v .» \ s '-w "••- i-j|WnV \ •—X—i____• X ' V ^ 'v . *'VI:fe-.\ A'. >k ^-.^ fc 1V*V ' V \ « ‘ ' rO * Vw — >;|-WV '“.' s’:y f f|,T V\ \ \ .sJ• v,.'\ v\\,x'X A • :t •"iif: V. VX;; >'v.Vi ^ V '■ .-^ 14''" • > ■ M \ \ N \ ' '* ^ I# ‘ V y r : 1 ;i«'l '.. I M iti1^, . \ \f cj T • • 4 I • • » t ’•*t§ .« - - y"ri- i+ >; -*‘ ’i:' ; ’■».. •: II,V:4 » 4X • I*-’ ; ■' ’ ' =■ ■ ':V. rS :• . - .. »■ ■'.’ *« • ■ V'' . *.-X ■\lJ ;X.>4 A ifcv4 4ii .r piX Bi" s;,-..t--sii * <i : ^ !• 'i \X S X =-Jf > • * * •« *4 «•.«•% ■ «p^- iJ' ......flS' * * j? * * »»f , r MOAO NOA’ >.. . . V '■• * .*. > f' Ir^ x x?na ... ■: ■' 200 <••« ••■ m ••• ». ■♦•••«•• lIHliPI I. iittk ... rV Mv% ■ •!; .:■' ■ »’''?.V’-V: •y* • ?T ;fT r ^ , <(/'*' '•{ ■ .»•' >*. ' ^>,tv /t^ .y '1 ^:\t. HIGH PROFILE RIGID FRAME V 4 12 Roof Slopa t >• -■ •••■•’ . • ; ; ^ • <-.-7 r'%, , ' *. WOTM ; .. NOTE: PURLIN AND GIRT DEPTHS DEPENDENT ON DESIGN REQUIREMENTS. :• f K ■ I'; -. ::l 1 3 •IIPS^U^HAMC Oim«f»»ioos §hot»n .v« rof 25 b«#s SO* jnd 30 l>4i»» »Jw Jv«<i4tiltf COMport«f>IS 4f>d f»Hmn rrw K«^«Ci fO CNv«0« 'Su* 1 ZT -. «c ui *S 5 • « -••-• ■ ■< * . ' * • . ■ .7' •’ |»Sf Lt v ’ ‘ 1 ' ^ >. •0 ,p8fVl ■' • y •>vr^-So .|B %S • * ■.»’• •- -: a w v;d E f t*.0^ Z « :. J v .'-. -'A.vV;■V*’ ** D ■\: .Vt~. E A ^E rr-«Tr 0‘y-i(T 2r- r 14**10-r r*0-* 1T-6-25-11-14--10-10-8*-4“lT-3-25*-r 14*-10“r-r 8-3-i3*-r ir-io“28*-ir 16**10-r io*-8-15-6-25-11-16*-10-10-10*-4"15 *r •25*-r 16*-10-r-r 10-3-i5*-r tj-io-26**ir ir-io-r 12*8-ir-6-25-11 ir*io-10-ir-4-17 *3“25**r ir-io-r-r 12-3“17*-0“ y-1(T 3C-3-16*-6-r 8-5-i5 ‘-<r 34*-r 16*6'r-r r-ir ■ 14-6-‘34--1-;, lT-6-1**6 “r-a-14-3- !t*M(r 3r-3"ie*-r r io**r ir-o-34-r ir-6-r-r 9*-ir ir-T 34*-r' i8;-6-1*-8“9*-8-18*-3- 13*-1(T 3T-r 2<r-6-r ir-5-i9*-o-34*-r 2o*-r r-r ir-io-18-6-34*-r 2(r-6-r-r n*-r ir-3- i5'-i(r 3r-r 2T6-r 14**5-2i*-<r 34*-r 2T-T r*r iT*ir 20*-6-: i*-r 22*-r••r-r 1T-8V 20--3- i9'*i(r 36--3-26**6'r i8*-r 2T0-34*-r 2T-r .-r ir-ir 24*-r 34'-r 2T-6-1*6-ir-8-24*-r 2T*t(r 36**r 30*-6-r 2T5-29*-0-34*-r 30*-6-r-r 21*10-28*6*“* 34*-r 3o*-r r-r 21-8“28*-r ■*^i »r-iO'45*5-20**2-r-r io'*r 18'*4-44*0-20*-r r-5-9*-r 18**0-4T-6-20*-2-1-6 “9'-r ir-ir 1T-UT 4y-5*2r*2-i**r ir*r 20**4-44*-0-2r-r r-5-ir-r 2o*-r 43-6"2z-r r-r 11-8-i9*-irs * i 15-10-45'-5-24*-r ri-14-r 22*-4-44-0-24*r r*5-1T8-2T-T 4T-6-24*-r r-r 1T-6-2r-ir ly-iO"45*S “26**r r*r 18*2-26-4-44--0-28* r r-5-ir-8’26*-r 4T r 28-r r-6 “iT-e**. .25-11 “ 23‘f(r 45*'5-3r*2*v-r 2r r 30*4-44-0-3r 2-v-5-21-r 30--0-4T-r 32*-r 1*-6 “21-6 “29-10' ir-io*5T*r 21‘.»a-r*r 9**10-20**0-5T-6-21-10-r-r 9*-r i9*r 53-4“2V-1C'r-r 9*-5 “19*-6- is S •V* t3*-10-54*r 23**10"r*i-ir*i(T 2r*o-53-6-2T10-r-r ir-r 2r*6"53 4-2T-10 r-r ir-5-21-6 “ 15-10-54 ’-7-25*10-r-r 13-10-24-0-53*6-25*10-r-r 13-r 2T*r 53-4-25-10-r-r 1T-5-23-6- ir-io-$4*7-25^*10"r-r irio-28 0-53*6-29**10-r-r ir-6-2r*r 53-4-29*-10"r-r ir-5 “2r-5- 23*10-54 ‘-r 33*-10-r-r 21*10-32-0-53 6-3T*10-r-r 21-6-3r*6-53 4“3T-10"vr 21-5-31-5“ ir*io-54*3'23*-r r*r 9**r 21'-2-6T-10-2T*6-r*io-9*-r 20-10“62* *6 “2T-6-r-r 9-r 2(T-11' b N 13‘‘10'64*3-25*-6-i**r ir-9-232"er-io-25*6-r-10-11-3-22-ir 62*-6-25*-r r-r ir-r 22*11- IS'-IO"64 r 27**6-r-r 13'-9“25*2-6r*io-2r 6-r-10-iT-r 24*-ir 62*r 2rr r-r iT-r 24*-11“ 19^*10-64*r 31*6-r-r ir*r 2T*2-62*-10-31-6-r-10*ir-r 28-10“6T-6-31-6-r-r ir-r 28-ir Cr:-2T-10-64*r 35*6-r-7"21-9-33 2-6T10-35*6 “r*ir 21-r 34.*-9“6T 6 “35*-6-r-9'21-r 32*-ir % ‘13*10-77 r 2r*r r-4-ir-6-25 ^71-r 2r*r r-ir 10**9“24*-5-71-r 2r-2*r-ir KT-r 24 5 “ O 1 13-10-77 r 29**2-r-4-1T6 ’2^-^71-6-29**r i*-ir 12*9-26*-5-71* r ^9^r r-ir i2*-r 26-5 “ CO 19-'10“73-6"33*2'^r 4-ir-6'31 -f“71-6-3T-r r-ir 16*-9-30'-5"71-r 33-2“r-ir ir-r 3<r 5 “ ?3‘*i(r-73'-6-37*-r 1 ■4**21**6-35-r 71-6"3r-2“r*ir 20**9-34-5“71'0“37-r r-ir 20-r 34-5“ §13-10-or-o"30 6*r-5-ir*2-2T4-91-r 30* *r r-r 10-7“27-11“90-r 30-6“7-r 10-3"zrr lyio-or r »^*6"r*5-IT 2-30**4-9 r 3T-6-r-r 12‘*r 29**11“90**r 32-6*zr 12*-3“29*r 19*10 or*8-36*^-r*5-ir-r 34-4-si'-r 3T-6-r-r IS'-T":t-h“9a-r 36^-6“2*-r 16-3“3T-r 23*10-or 0'4<r-6-r*5-2r*r 38-4-or-r 4a-6“r-9**20* r 37 *11“90-1“40''8-2*-r 20 r 3r-7“ oec Ijlj-nr 6 “OOIO"r*r ir r 31 6"110*4-wicr r-r 10' 4“30*11“109*-6 “33-10“r 2““-r 30* 10“ 15*10"nr-6-35 10-r*r iT*r 33-r ii(r-4-35-10'r-r 12*4-32-vr 109-6"35-ir 2-2“i2*-r 32*‘10" 19* ID-iir 6-39-10-1-6-ir-r 3r-6"110-4“39 10"2 1-16*4-36**11“109-6 “39-10“2 2“16*-0 ’38 10* 23 10"nr 6-4310-r 6-21 r 41 6"110-4-43'-10'r r 20*4“40 -ir 109 6"43-ir 2-2“20 0*40-10' ^4^ 11 t * T 1 { '■ .m :r-:?: til h. GME CONSULTANTS, INC.^ • Geotichnical * Matsriais * Environmental 14000 21st Avenue Na Mirmeapolis. MN 55447 (6191553^099 Rw 1619)559.0790 •n. - — • • ‘?rrrv^tr3r>.;rT ^'.•aT**^ ii •.c.’i—tor-* JOB NO. 3 H SHEET___(- OF ^ JOB NAME '~‘6/U)/OZ> ^ f* DATE ^ ^BY CHECKED BY DATE 7^.- ,pe^<l. e/l*c{L^c>^ : -S'/i-o ^u/Msn ‘r P^<3^.:<2<^>0 A / T7<^ p f=b/^ TM t ^ OAjti 4)"^ I ’/*! S^^dto (i /iocffo's r-te ^^y/i0<p "TVPGo/L i03 Poo^O C/i^ B/U^oa J^ (S/Ut^ S/tK)0fy ‘ /0^a;77 j ^ /C dA^ ha^ (1^ rb /aj a y ’ *^e Z ;q/«" / .■’V' '.L^ ST/J^P ^ Co /7T /N>iSp</i^ J3^dup • • ’.' * -V CL/fy 1t% S>7j-/t.>r7-o 6 ^sT Re'c-^ ?><? T^U«/c. flxf-i- ^ ^Pie>o7i4^S0 you ^ LO-^ f^tjLAJl> Sop-T" oP /f'RouP ^^ poiTT. Sh^u^ Ahur?-- /4j TV^r c.Ct^ A4jhg^t7f^ ^Tit^c^r^ /%^#K AiifiP)^ TO T'dt^ry /hcAtij Tke jc^ f^TTORi^jUr. m Psxrr. un/prvt^ A~ DepyTfT cx^ 'TVlJ /-/ C^^S^ST^t " CO I 77^ UJ U'thX~' iO ^ 040 TVB^ J un^ YO T>t^ /P Th-^4 7^4^PC U WU3 f dOB pc^dic;^ rjU 3 • t fO id P^ hi C^u t A S Xc Y2/tr (C^ cJ/o JiAAryta Pz}irn/u6C R / u,/■Tk/tnu^ SdbAcfi I <u>.Tr7*ic o^ni<£' S(,rt T fv ^ L ■\ ': I) .uJ^teSSLMm^ •iik r. ■ t 'v.i i-i w r. ■«grg^><l»T- 6iito‘ru ri0 GME CuMSUi. I HI i'i S iH'- 4, *-t^torvLrt ..rnsinjivi r f* ■“C'Oii Hr*-.' £^'J r*w aD* H ( ^ SHEET - OF_______- to GME CONSULTANTS, INC. GftOtBctY^ • Materisls • Environmantsl 14000 21st Avenue No. Minneapolis. MN 55447 1612) S5&S1959 F«xCei9J 559^720 JOB NO. JOB M.ur /Ce fhteiuA^ - k) • l^cV)f€f^DATE CHECKED BY.DATE fy^/s:ncit^ T^T ( s] < /y^fs/ii/i^ Fzrun^ CS I ht)rt>/L pi^U^ CO i'TH Cl(y^^Cp^ RaTT"^ c3 pb777Ai(^. i • ^/UtOui,A/^ Sc I'Ll T<^ ^ HJUSVB' %/j ^ piHi S 7\cyt^ / CL'S ^<^7t0 P*^P 0 ^ 0 >0 Cy^iO y m ui-n I 3. v\ n r: p^ Ay ^i/0JuA/g^ A)e^ ^ fcoBcoc? Pet 7 Sg)^ ^AypO co ^ trV). S- 6^^^ ^2-^/7 1 i:,;t fSV' ;’: > /aJ Uc.30 Tihij -A k-" i .'T? ijiyrrsL, O' T^ (f^sytn^oc !)u^rr yt^Ob^ 7V^ /-YVarr T* ^c~ ^'^hLcrp^U'C 0ic^Lm< ' u 1 y-Skih ^TJ /a ^/A</ ifP^-c: Shi^ S/ '7~* I |V A PUYlc/Lfi/t^cG^I P/hfJtfT ^ /d£pfGK^ '■HV i “ I A m pc =^r*^s C'^ f £ ire Cc( f/k /ftcA^tPQ '— i^iA) C %y\X'/o/h PLA cS eG~opiS^Cic Q0cy~ juhCjil^i00'=’^^(Ji3>^ lyiHh S’si'BZS' AiH'ifTJtipiOL- Su^y^P /k/>^/pop 2fi3J.'^c iv/77/ AL/r^/SiiyT' Li ft>. 17~cf^P P- 3 ■/f ■:r. --i -1^• ■ - ^ -.rr»‘ 7r x: - '-Y/‘fv ■■ ^i.-- .*>■ (^i2i53^ V‘4iU w lt£ CC*! o'ji-i t Tb ii v. I «■ t -trrrrf!^- v»-» *» wjrnr»«i=tMrrt»aiM^ ' •n^mVxauOii.JXntBr -rrsn I *0 A ••• I “*v*^*-»* ^ ' w!-*»— 1. — K2»:.r ».*: ♦ S«». • ? r aexx.ag^.cn;tft. jcr*. nx ^ll GME CONSULTANTS, INC. Gsotechnicai • Materials • Environmsntsl 14000 21 St Avenue No Mimeepolis. MN 55447 (612) ss&ieso taclBi a 559-0720 JOB NO . 3 V4 SHFET___2.7 JOB NAMF. -aAd^ - BY CHECKED BY. DATE DATE. u^oeKScai‘t- P‘>-T PUiyit sfi/fOiAi cr-r <D~ ‘ C Pt,<aoe P/Ps^ s97=rr r* tj^xr'2) * (jsdi^^yu Pfiv ti^K 0^ ^ ici ^ C C XI / J aI PfirOe^M.^TJ i. /(J^atty/A} Cj 7~t> S/(^ • 4 * •i: iStii ^ v-j- V W': -f. f*. "4^/: l» :v.|^ P> .7^ • V'. • • ■, ■■ i '-• /IiLk.UL ■,ii ■ o. --; tinAitihiito'Sh*',\^iBiaitiiiiiBTt I ^-y.' '' > f1 jt/’" vi: ; *-Gf •^wu • m»' I • . • « . i-oCj v>r i>^r%<i^io • fr PROJECT Proposed Ice Arena OWNER ^ ,. ... 1Orono Area Sports Facility, Inc. SITE County Road G - Orono. Minnesota Ui Uu X !ba a: UIayS isSf: 1SS 2SS -j UJ > Ui I—Ui UJu. Uio CC Ui < $ I-.' 5SS ess i Xa < § I- (/) i.a 4.0 7.5 8.0 r-/' 11.5 .'-'Vv 1 5^': 1 i:' ■'• description of material SURFACE ELEVATION —^ Black CLAY WITH ORGANICS, traco . ^ m. m S and - stiff - (OU (topsoil) Gray brown SANDY CLAY, trace gravel - firm - (CU Brown SANDY CLAY, trace gravel - firm to stiff - (CL) \ - - * Brown SILTY CLAY, trace sand - stiff - \(CL)_______________________ Gray brown SANDY CLAY, trace gravel - stiff to very stiff - (CL) y / • End of boring at 11.5 feet Hand auger used full depth Borehole backfilled with cuttings Blow counts obtained from an 89 pound hammer falling 11 Inches corrdated to 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches (/) h- Z) O) LU X f-in UI h- itUI Q. ^ </l O 0.75 t.O 1.25 ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Delano Erickson Architects_____ UNCONnwCO COMPRESSIVE STRCNGTU TONS/FT.* . . .Q. - - ! 2 3H VE V)? O UJzy < > Iz 6 6 4 -t- WATER CONTENT % STANDARD PENETRATION (BLOWS/FOOTJ --<8^ - 10 20 30 40 60 (2) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS W.lTE 1.8 feet while drilling W.L. T 1 foot 4 hours after drilling W.L. Boring caved at 10 feet after auger removal Em EfIO OME CONSULTANTS. INC. OMUcfv^al • MaUnU*. tnviroAiwemel 14000 21at Avemic No. M«%n«e|>oUs, MN SS447 I<n?} 669 1869 (g) 28 < .-,r BORING started 4/24/92 borino completfo 4/24/92 wo Hand Auger ORIUER DW D*%AvyN JLH APPROVECWCK JOBS 3464 sheet 1 of 1 The stratification line:^ represent approximjtt; uuumuomc between soil types; insitu the transiton may be gradual. '4 ji I 1 ■ > '» f/.r-'v:mm, 6 ^ ^'11 >■' ••* f'.; : ^~Ti j. % \r ' ’ ' u\JKj or owntnio o* ^ PROJECT Proposed Ice Arena OWNER Orono Area Sports Facility, Inc. SITE County Road 6 - Orono, Minnesota ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Delano Erickson Architects H* Hi tiiu* fC liimSz> o 1SS mI Ui 5 5 2SS 3SS •jSS im 6S5 *. , •'ili * H ■ 4 i: ti I 7SS ii*: I ‘-’4 ■ '»VJ r; K UI Ui Ll. Ui O X0 <1 h* VI -XL5. 4.0 I 12JQ. 15.0 DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL SURFACE ELEVATION > Black CLAY WITH SAND. ORGANICS. \trace silt - (QL) (topsoil)7 Brown and gray SANDY CLAY, trace gravel • stiff to firm • (CL) Brown SANDY CLAY, trace gravel • very stiff to stiff - (CL) -.v,' , * i-. y 1 . ’ vV ' ;> r Gray SANDY CLAY, trace gravel - Stiff - (CL) t r»’ End of boring at 15 feet Hand auger used full depth Borehole backfilled with cuttings Blow counts obtained from an 39 pound hammer falling 11 inches correlated to a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches Dw> UiX >- (/) UJ ~ m O cn O o •Jm Ui D < > 1.25 1.1 1.0 8 UNCCW^r^*CO compressive STRENGTH TCNS/FT.*•--o--- 12 3 4 6 ------------» I-----------------1----------------1----------------1----------- WATER CONTENT % STANDARD PENETRATION (BLOWS/FOOT) 10 TO 30 40 60 ; 1 !» WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS W.L.jM 2.4 feet while dri'.img W.L. W.L. Boring caved at 12.5 feet after auger removal ___________________ CME CONSULTANTS. INC. 04Ct«chiYieal • Mat^fiaU - tn^\torm*9nUA 14000 21 at Avanua No. ilirwveepclb, K4N 65447 (617) 560-1859 a;-. BORINO STARTED 4/24/92 BORING COMPIETEO 4/24/92 RIG Hand Auger DRILLER DW DRAWN JLH APPROVE CA/VCK JOR* 34 C4 SHEET 1 of 1 The stratilication lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types: insitu the iraiisiton may be gradual. .» • -llw r-4^:... DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 PHONE: {612)930-2500 (612) 930-2513 (612) 930-2696 ■- = •.April 27, 1992 *1.- •av'i . P Jeanne Mabusth Planning and Zoning Dept. City of Orono P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <r i ■> Re: Proposed Athletic Site, Southeast Quadrant ■r ,-V- CSAH 6 at Old Crystal Bay Road Jeanne: As we discussed during our on-sits review, Hennepin County would prefer that all access to the above site be via Old Crystal Bay Road. However, If this recomfflendation 1s deemed Impractical by the City, then one entrance onto County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 6 would be permitted, subject to the following conditions In preferential order: y - A city-street-type entrance with full auxiliary lanes (westbound bypass, eastbound right turn), serving an Internal street system, located at the east property line. - A parking lot driveway similar to the above, w1th\a westbound bypass lane^located within 300 feet cf .the east property line. • ‘i Any access to CSAH 6 should be between 40- and 52-feet wide, at least 100 feet Into the site. Careful attention should also be paid to internal circulation, parking, and drop-off service areas. Our initial contact was Del Erickson, architect for the.Ice arena group. We all should maintain close contact to ensure the best product for the site and the motoring public. Please call with any further questions or discussion. Sincerely, V '1 ■ ■■'a’JS''?' isii David K. Zetterstrom Entrance Permit Coordinator 0K2:mvr cc: Del Erickson, Architect jRf. ."V ’ •*' rS: HENNEPIN COUNTY • •an equal opportuniTy employer :v:i ?-* • . it v‘r .■■.■iri. >. 'JcL’Xr.'. ij-W, ; •*W 7»W^^ V •« • • • Nk;' * ;. ‘ V-; • 'yl' !/' ^'1/- ■ -I.A \V ■.•*'. Iy*-- r:"l' :i w .>4it»:',v: Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator June 8r 1992 #1739 Albin J. Nelson, 500 Oxford Road Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.03, Subd. 19 - Applicant proposes land alterations in excess of 100 cubic yards. The alterations involve the removal of tiered retaining walls and the replacement with fill at 2.5 to 1 slopes. List of Exhibits A - Gustafson Report dated 6/5/92 B - Application C - Plat Map D - Property Owners List E - Topographic Survey ■ V' :‘5f. >- •• Description of Request The applicant proposes the removal of tiered retaining walls within the street yard. The retaining walls were installed at the time of the installation of the pool and patio area and are now in a serious state of disrepair. The purpose of the application is to install fill at elevations that can be planted with ground cover that will not require regular maintenance. Fill to be placed in the areas where there are several mature trees shall be protected with 50 lineal ft. 3-4' high retaining wall to be placed at the base of the northern portion of the fill area. Refer to your topographic plan. Exhibit E. W, The City Engineer's office has completed the review of this conditional use permit application. Please refer to Shawn Gustafson's report of June 5th, Exhibit A. The report notes the following issues to be addressed by applicant: 1. ipsiil Existing timber retaining walls should be removed and disposed at an approved disposal site. Ground cover at 2.5 to 1 slopes must be of a type of vegetation that will not require maintenance. /A ■■ -;.i Granular material and drain tile to be installed behind 3-4' high retention wall to minimize hydrostatic pressure at the base of the wall. <nfiiiT>riiiinNri -m'-. irtiiiBii Til ir ill I 3 ■■•4 •;v ■ :vj , f X-------------- W » .■.: '■ ,•'>, Zoning File #1739 June 8r 1992 Page 2 ki ■ l; \X ■ r*^' h--' >1^ Slopes should be graded to allow a small drainage swale running along the top of the wall. Such swale would divert surface runoff to the sides and minimize amounts of runoff flowing over wall. p.'Wall should be constructed of a modular block system such as "Keystone." '■M Options of Action To deny current proposal ormmm 'IWI Vi Approve subject to conditions set forth in the City Engineer's review memo or Other. iiW I i- i ‘ ■ V : X. . ii V* ■ #- ■ -'V'' i. '1c: > i .* iailil^msrnm ' 1 'Wimmm mm jig :i;pl>:"B.aM p ■fv f • ■'B 5®4-;' 'S'B' ‘V. wm^■ f-" ‘f ;siSi«P SiS b1<t m mm . • :.... ^it;;If ■ ■r K ^ ■: •;::- ^ 0:' - ■■■ P. ' J. ^1. ■ ■ •, • --%p -.=f .: ‘ VJ;^V "M iwiiiiili g&OT "'mt. ■. r'p:' »■’f .a ' ii ^ -'i ■, *'i •: .; ; •■* t itspffl ' ', g V fM; -*:i' Sf-;- ■ mM m ■ ■ X , 'X ■. -ig ' ■p#*' CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USB APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION (^CcLh ^ 1‘ Site Addres.3 SCO O K FCRJ>’73'44 1 r '-fi Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) QS*—*j / ‘ Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. £C^C^J APPLICANT Name Address ^OQ Q % A £tit hj o I M PI Phone (home) H^3 3*3 77 _Phone (work) 3 3Gp City 0 g 0 A,’0 Zip5£l£6 9NER (if different than applicant) Name ^cx*^c. cxs App(i(ia,hi Phone (home) Phone W: 4:Address City Date Property Acquired _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) I (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USB PEPJIITS - •I -V 1M-: .• ■ w ' ' ' HP piifi $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $175.00 Ins+-it.utional (church, school, etc.) ___ $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments __ $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _ _ _ $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration cirr OF uRDHO F}^RA^<C£ OFFICE 1350200000 Oi CEH 200.00 urrk' T] /'i/»Liiuin iL i-Vv.vv j RECEIFl-THM YOU U242590 cool ROl T04:i. y5/?o/c Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more ^ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore ■ ; “ • . PRD/PID - see fee schedule Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 75.00 $300.00 $300.00 $100.00 COTimercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Appeals , ' • Other - see fee schedule ■ I irf - ^ - *»f„ PRESENT OSB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District 1- R- lA Present Use of Property _ _ Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST REQUIRED SUBMITTALS j.irrxun ue xu^ucioj. rv i Describe request in detail; K.£fh01/g r*~ la / Ki (^ J lO (1 /1 cx r c o r\ cl s I nr^ m » ki<« ft <s “ /i n fj -Pill ^ <7 ^ c* Q . S' .* _/—_____________ P O_________________ Ki//^ Vr’ ho rW t o u<± r lx/ iff h<2 u COfT r. Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtaii this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governmer-f Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan# if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this applicatioUf please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 'VW'i ^ *jm YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete Initials of Clerical Staff:Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses Incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of Mister knowledge. Applicant * s signature OWNERS SIGNATURE . The owner hereby acknowledge§/and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification o^/]bhi^ request. Owner's signature i y f ■ r ~ —- Applicant must have^^llsubmll^als into the City offices 2^ days before the Date Planning Commission Meeting. yi>lanning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. V.i I a .rfr. ‘ ('vA »tf7-r, r<,^ S UP“ — *■ ^ .. .y***?^ tr< e^y^ocI no K •'•’n.. _ ^ Ua #T .^..i .vi I .^<»f , ^ - II V yj HO 9 0 in /I 'tff'U' *ri p It «!» » Lli' ii*-' ' Li ;v.? > r^ ■1.^ •, . .?*te.'- -— (*m MAXWE v‘7 .u-'s . »i ,» -* A •sn|!:m:m % w-i- . L\ . ^. . * , ,, r^- ■ '.V?,T. . . . ■ . V • . *■*.... -“ ^. . . . ^ .- ^ .♦ . • • . ■ . ' • - ■ * *. # t ■-•«:’> |‘ -> v/Av- I t • ” •-. , i > .11'.-^ -f \v - . •:.> % . *: • t.% -- -. 1 . . r -A-•■ ■ ^^ **5.-*r^r' ‘V,'s . • *-‘t. *. *'.♦ _ ! — - • '. - -- - * -j r» -n -I O -a H O -a ‘ ; _ H Q ^ ' H S 2 i< ^ \ ,. ».«»• ■ • H Q U2 > 2 »«s/* ^ X T3 m *o * - :X X m m > :o m > X \ -< >\ •< > m X 0 >• m X 0 X > 0 ^0 X > 0 XX J :^ 0 2X. S _: :•X m ,,... '- '^ '''■ • -: * ■■ ■ ‘v?;..--r-.■•:-■• *-■ •' ■ ', ^v >■- :'* ,•: •■■♦“'■ *■■ • “•"rV--- *■• '* \ • • .• * * - ‘ ’ '•* • .••• -‘* • y • •■-• • HkVl. . '•■ ' , * - • :A • 5l »•' * ■ 'a .- ■ • - .M. _5-*>,. • * "^**^' *.'■'"l. ■';'** . ' J •'• ••''* ••*' »*' .... f. 4jS»v i, ‘‘v^T‘ •■••••'. - ' .",• '".'• -.*'■» >'■ '> ’•*.'•.* ' *’ - .v^-’ V { >■* ^ 4-,v' ‘■‘"■'•ifc"*' yv/.‘ fSif-:» ‘t »••. * ... v V .v.- *../j\'-A ,v •*.• * .••• ■ . - ■■ - 'v *M . , '*■ .' > ■• A4 .» V ■ ■■>«• ••■“.*», -A ••-, •••.,. • ••■;•■; •■' C*.'^-;.' ^.r*; •. ■ **- • 0^'* * *• ~. .* •* . ‘ * V. V '4 ' ■ .• * i ^'■* .- y .V • ■ ■ •► V. ■V -• *t ♦. .•i* «: **'. V r* ui o o o w- o------- 73 I wi ^ _ - Q U1 3 O O 0» in in o in ’■k 'i > .-4 M I X Q > ► _ Mm 55 ;*» r. _ O O O S ->1 2 -n I2 » ^ oc c § - - . . •• ,-*kl V ♦ - ^ .. . -Inin 5jj5^xM ^ X X > I o > > ti r» 5P-« 2r* r* M (/) o o m >4 M X O > M *o -o w m m m i/> tn > J5 S ' ' a s s K > A oo M V S ... ' - .-A- O-n A.p > . . "r--."' ’■S'.'8 ‘'T* '.; .- • . . • •xA.v^i -r.-.. *'. . y ’.- . ■ . - ^ .'• ,-. '• . - . ^- t -A. - . A ‘ . . • :z P o *• •a*' u*? ? S5 .-o . # • •. f%->4 - • . 4 *1 V *• ■ tirf ^ *s ' .r i* *• ■•'*•.' ”' ‘ ^ ^ . -r-.-' -r ‘ .. ".tN ■*■-'•• ^ M A •• •■. A •,: ■-.-. - • 'f. ,• •.,. A;.. .4^.^«;\ .i V-V.^ -.' s • V '' '-A ..' -1 . A-•■■•.- . ■ -. '•'•'•■-~r:-,* M. ■?■- # , - • • • * . ,?T *• -• >/• « ;. f .:> - W 5 ^ .................................................. ■ /. >!L'^4vvr.» ^ K-:: :ccr*r.<^u v ' •'*•*••.’•'— « , «. * . . , ^ -,*. • ■ • CEP jOIs w-;; ’ - I - •'V-, i.‘^ ■»* -t*'’ • ‘,’f^’,‘ S«v^r -•• J *-*■* '•.'Uv«‘,w;i*» ...~ ‘*V' • IT a* -iT*. ^ O ' > H ^W . <, • .* & .’ ,^V ,** r" «• ^', ** ,V*v -•'»v •'• *•'■ >.*' • - ;• ♦ •. >. •♦.' •./ /.*4-; • • *. ..t<*. . ,*. % . *• ♦. '■ .• • •-*< . ' ‘r. , . ;*■'- w'**»*‘ rV '*>;••' '*v. ^ ■» I , • • • • »V ••^ 4*T S •••^.** • •. ’»'#-».• » ^ ^ * ’• •-■•Mairf **■»<. , • • O . * . i .. -4 ,^..r *♦ * ^ ^- ••-.**>•. , •«. «•. 4* ■ V-;. •;.' :• • . ■ ; :• .• ^ .;^‘ T^- • *> *: -v •,- •*'-.*' • * .. - ’ •• "/*/ . .. ; ■■.*••. . 0 •' . i *• • . • • • . .-* , .■ .' V. . *• S ’ ^ • ■* * • "*'•* * '. ’’T ^ ^ ■ ' “ I* •„• ,»'.•*•« ,-. A* 5 * • *V ^ ^ ' . * ^ • • • • ‘^v, *.. a • %. ■ * ‘ ^ r>r •'*•. r». • \* ^ .-• « '. * • -v • •ix 19 ■ S,.:V4 5 S 3 ^ ’ ./J' **• ^ 'V^ ■ ‘ ^•* ;^'—‘■**'.’ fs. ■.' .: .• •. ■ . •■■...• 'w. *',:■ Z Z ^ j ’.’ . ::.* * *<■...' *. .. • •, •*..■•' • * , •: . :•'* t■ ' ■ . t • - V fc* j.» ■ V* r « ^7’ *1 •- * ' • • t-'. •*; . - • ' ^ -^r.* •• -^. *' ■- ‘\ ... -V... .• ^•. *.,'■■.■.* V ,. 4- ■ i '• • . ■ n ■! .. -.. '. .it -V I,-. ... . '<1*». •*:>• m o -o Q Mm z •■ > 'F- .**■.■ •• ■ • ■ *»■•':;■■» ‘t ."' \ H • . • 9 ■ ■ ■' . * . • I, . ; • • _ . # •..... .*■ >; ;.-viV..r. .' rj:r ■•‘■‘.V. ,f .. .... T ■• •/« «, ‘ Vw ■ *. .. •. y , • . 1. . . • V * ••'i '’'■ .' *•'**' 5 09m M Z “n X» O O ■ . - ...»- (. t «4 ' '* * ' ? A->ri -4. ••. • • i '.., i *• i . ..4 ■ • . • ■ . , • • f. •., .... - ^. . Q2 ’-•; ..J' ‘i - " At‘- A* 1m i .* ,« .« t ' • ’ * ♦ ' * m.V tl- -v^ /’■"'i: '■ ■- i‘. 1hl M Om m V ^ TJ H > M m t • • • s > _</) mffl . • . * • • ^ •* * •* .>b .^ »•cl'* • '(/> S-§ . .. ■s • .* • •*‘ - . . 7 .. !2,- .« .. ^ 3''- >4 * ■ «.. fvi v ’'.• • 5 j i-- <U .'BB wb '^'' *' •“ ' '^ -•...• ' . v\-. * - • ■ * • * * . V 1 .'A V ’ : t • . ; ■' . ■ Is - * t'•’.. 4 .•% «.*« * '. 4-> • »A4*’ ,.. 4.--. A»Vv •*<* V", t p- • , di . » . 1 ^ 4 ^ • ...-•U*. - • . ..•« . • . 4 • •'^ ■ # •■«,*/. • ■ • • . • ■ ■ . ^ • - ' • *^4 --v^ • .r._ ... •. | 4 ■ * • . , * . . • ■ • *^ , ■ • a - .• •■-.< ' '4 _• .“ * - ' * . ■ ', • .. 'V.. ^ •; . .-t x-N V .. >'.% *• ^ 4 „ .4 ^ ^ V - '. -• • i * *■ •■ v' '■ . ' .c* : ‘%.r ■ •-. j-; X «- s ' ><y ' • V.' • ^V* .4 - . 4^4. ^ ------^ -4 ■•^ ■ w . - •*.•_.. . ,...»-. _ *• » •-. *.*-._ ••. ••'» ..4 ^(*.. *. . ■ •.*•» .*f '•• . . ^ . Vt .** • '«■ ..' . „■ r-..^ ■ “ 4 -4. -,..<■ . * ■ » . ■"• •x4r. *.■•- ' * .= • -.X. - .4 • • ' , « f - ■ i,.'. . • #;.-x-. • ,t % •• V r-.. • V ^V.4.-----ii...J.a», ----■ r.rfcifc na«ifc a*<iirT ■ '1.-' # '. ■') 1 jrt. Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator 4('’- ^Sy- /•S'--4 Front Date: Subjects Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator June 8, 1992 #1740 Steven M, Harris - 3850 Watertown Road - Renewal Conditional Use Permit/Public bearing .a Pertinent Ordinance |P^ Section 10.03, Subd, 19 - Conditional use permit required for alterations involving land alterations in excess of 100 cubic yards. Applicant proposes excavation of a pond 100' in diameter at 4' depth. Original conditional use permit approved May 8, 1989. ,v List of Exhibits A - Application B - Applicant's Original Addendum Submitted with Application #1367 C - Property Owners List D - Certificate of Mailing E - Plat Map P - Original Staff Memo for Application #1367 G - Survey H - Grading Plan I - Planning Commission Minutes and Council Minutes Preview of Application #1367 J - Glenn Cook Report 4/12/89 K - Resolution #2629 V - Bevietr of Current Application Applicant proposes no changes from the original conditional use permit that would seek permission to install a 100' diameter pond at a 4' depth located approximately 100' from the closest lot line. The pond is not located within a designated wetland. The purpose of the pond ie both decorative and functional. The pond is not designed to encourage a wildlife habitat. The mail, purpose is to provide additional retention area for surface runoff and ground water buildup. The banks that are to be installed are 3 to 1 slope to encourage the return of vegetation and fencing is to be installed adjacent to pond area to prevent horses from interfering with principal function of pond. Staff recommends approval based on the findings and conditions set forth in Resolution #2629, Exhibit K. • .CIT*i. OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND USB APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION ftiM ■ I' A i Site Address ^ [Property Identification Number (P«I«D.) mm- * Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Address . Phone (home) JPhone (work) _ _ _ City <^>nc>^^o_ _ _ Zip OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone Address City Zip Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land FEES - CONDITIONAL USB PERMITS - $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg ( $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration ChtCK TL 100.00 RECtlFT-TH^^^K yOO ^2600 coot ROi T04i. 2Z- Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more , Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule 0 .^Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee ~ Double Current Application Fee X APP1.ICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 75.00 $300.00 $300.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezonlng (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Appeals Other ~ see fee schedule f If; If-’ a PRESENT USB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District __ _ _ _ _ _ _ - Present Use of Property _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Residential _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Other (specify)___ _ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST - . “ Describe request in detail: ^s:>—Cits— _ _ _ _<3-^ N <^\--«-•»*-A ' b/^ - -- - - - - - - -' REQUIRED SUBMITTALS ‘1. Completed Application Form. .»-«•/ U4.«4-2 Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350 (you can obtai. this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governmen- Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map. j % 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). ,^ 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list any other persons you wish notified of this application. ■{' YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED._____ The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date_ __ _ _ _ _ _^ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staft time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best o£_Jiis/her knowledge. Applicant's signature _ _ _ Date —^ "7*^- - The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and furth^er authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes or investigation and verification of this request. Owner' s signature Date ------ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held cm tne third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building fi zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 1 r A ' \m "-rry ■!>> .~.0»Sfl r ■ r,™K- I- P». K- I * • ^ } • V •. v' RNd r;^ MAR-6S89 :: VoOOT* cV O^ r • ^•-V^ V^aV ^oV V^«r Ao N d « 4T^C.iVW CK-V C rfL \ S CK % S'^'Xo « V vk ^ A OO \" — V S^O •A.V- -V ^ ^ ^Vc^vv«s*i \c •.,i-r>»C ' .,-^1 . -JW* ' * r. 'I»*J- * *• *iW .V “-ft '• .yV'-ir^*; v."'- . .t ' ’ti'.’-V'-f*- * •■■•rv.'B ..:! ■‘•iS'‘5 * f '--^di . .** • * ^ r * ‘ ^JS IT . ;’ -• i-'5fS/>W.-;< > t .* • _r^ .ri • •« < ‘ ^ ^ j v5 Vid - ^ **»• - v*:,T ' ■ * ;. • . -- A.«i, . X V—olX ■<— O ^ V » >- . .. r • • •4 » ,■ » - f . 4 • t. '■•r.P***:' Vf, W‘-\ . ‘■*‘ JL . • ’. >'^ »*- '1.^ V^>«* r^/i- V f 2.]^ “To Vs<»-VfK^ H -VVjt -X Alt ■\W •i* i K«k. ^ • w. •f ■•■i t *r' >i^t. >- '■--■• *V,v »1'^‘', r •! m # 1 w o o w w 00 cnr- o X 3C cn m ^ *;^ ^ w WC X 70 ^ f>J 3 t/> W CJ ^ GO —4 00 OO -o ui m 3 ^ Ui; ro O 3^ • r-? m m n ^ — 30 X 00 O »N> rn —I m Q»cz : -ox ^ ^ 25x^5®53^ rii I o O X w X X z ooo cn cn wcr 1/1 M W t/» X fV i^^sss % #• » 2 ^ S^5^5ni XJ3 o ^ T 8s ii^ll= S 8 <:m :! y !#• sS iSJg? r-S!'' te«s p il ^.; 7 -7'J^ 8::S5 •-^o-5 O ^ X ^v7-;:e §=: o ► 9 -4 ^m •< o Co|a -o -H » u * 5o? ^ 2** 5^5 o ^ oo o o o w i»^ o w ■ - j -.■ ^^ ^7.' IM \ » •« » —A«S"* 5359 3 5 “•»*’. 3 <^ > -,55i:sc- CoS^ ► -4cKV m 3 LJ O > X T3 Cl -H r- o :rm >sc X -rj 5> 3> •r- -« z z -^ •— rn m •-• X 00 O OJ X oo -H CJv X o5> u> X X r\j m m X !!S O *4 i*s I ilh ^ ^ M ► 9 ^;SxSo o s is;:;:ss |aSS2-••S-- Z esisssat -13 -I ^ • 8e 8 s- 8| .«4 .-, 5 3 9 r* f- e ^ '# * ■ 3 «l 9 m ^ Z 12 5 f* n§ m *n fv •' m V4 *1 9 Mm g5SS 1 iagl.j ^ ^ M -1 > 9 ? 2 ^X 2 VI m ni 1 9 9 m n# 9 VI W4 V/l W\n M M «4 m y VI r- r- 2 VI o O Z ^ o 9 O O O • :7-V- ffl Vf I/I w ,5^^ T m 9 C8 Jf g 94 30 33 3P Z 2 9 9 g ^ J / V -Klalk f m m G SM8si"i* 9 9 8* tfi ^ I/I VI I -< O 9 S O VI ISiiis 9 O VI -I r# *4 -4 W 91 39 •< -< > 01 -oggsi 39O in VI in o 9 Oo o 2 Vi O O o VI ^ 39 9 VI Qi •90100^ r- O X X Oi m ^ ^ o VI X 9 9 ni9 S o o t ^ n *j 9 X Ml 30 > > ^ C9 w O O SC Ul 9 2-z Z X X Z o ± ^ X X 5 X Ui 9 9 vn O Ml O o o in inMcnoovn*M*incno4i UJ o vn o 10 cn ^ -4 ► 9 Q VISSl!! . r / '-it'- ;pt^- «i # /■ -10 9 ^I aI ??22 Oi 9-1n>11 A > 9 N. ^ > 9 m 3 ^3 V 5 9 > M 2 o o O 9-1 Mi9 l’|S 1*|3 o M M Ssilfs O m m ^ Q 9 9 O VI f- *** -I -I ^ 5 X C. U ^ V4 m 9 Oai-'-S? 2 r* r* X M ^ 9 O O 5 -il “99 fHQvi 2^2®f2 i2isi —► 2 vn ^ 9 ^ — m Sm 9 9 9 0gs ri n Z Z 3 VI O >09 9 • O r- O X ffl i» > fti 9 M 9 ► * S 2 3®is r- o VI *-• O Oicn O f VI ffl o VI < • M V« O 9 VI 9 O Oi m o » 9 9 VI 3 m VI S VI in iiii~ -ism <n o -< in 9 M *8 -.'4<v, 5! i . ^4 9r*f a? VI VI / i P CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OP MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OP ORONO ) SS. ) I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1740, was mailed to the attached list of property owners . In Witnff^s Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 1st day of Tune, 1992. SK. V K;’V- - • tr.lsf ■ ■ Sf. . - ’I-. Pf.v> . ;■ ‘f' -i ,e':. ;,v. mm rih'lki ' 'A "ri'lmfm‘ - mm f:.t .::t . ‘1 - .'■ >}k b ? j 1 "I <i ..' ••'Vv !■••. . ■m- •’i! ' . 4^f& . -mmc > ' ■ iis: .a - ■v^ :vW- ;f *f/r rfi-' It * ■ V. CITY OF ORONO notice The Planning Commission will 1^92^on^°the matter of reviewing S^e following land use applicatxons: 1. #1739 Albin J. j^°^^®°Jterations^TnvoiVin^ th^e** removal of niailin^waris ird^lL^plaling of fill in excess of 100 cubxo yards adjacent to an existing swimming pool. ^ M tra-i-r--ic: of 3850 Watettown Road, has applied ^2. #1740 Steven M. Harrxs „ould allow the installation of a ponerenewal conditional use permit which would allow tne within his residential property. j cv «« w na+-7laff of 1115 Brown Road South, see} 3. #1741 Rodney J. r-onosed detacLd garage measuring 24'x22 approval of variances for a P P , variance that would allow the requiring a side setback front of th®detached structure to be installed in rronr principal structure. \ _ T • •*!*^no O!pon.o Orchsird Ro3.df 500k sppirovsl o* ^treet'seV?crand"r'lTr^"arI “variances for a proposed family room an< garagej addition.^ ^ V .. —-----------------------— 5. #1744 Donald Helgager of 32«5 Sixth Avenue^ North,^ loc’'a\erwithin“lh‘- setback variance for a "^®® ^J®^structures from a natural environmen- 150* required setback area for all strucrurei, lake. i e. #1745 David R. “°ithL^thro-75““and“ 7^S-°250^ iftback^arei r. setback and hardcover ito a seasonal cabin. Proposec for remodeling and a deck existinc on-site sewage treatmen improvements will required stan^dards. Applicant has als facility and conformance to , seasonal code seeking approval o for containment of a gray water. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time are Elicited. Plans are available for review in the City offices .o review by appointment. City of Orono By: Planning Commission .f Jeann^A. Mabusth il^nqBulling & Zoning Administrator To be published the week of June 1, 1992. jCy . -i • « » •• ••■ • 4% » . * . ' m » *' ••••''• ■ **.•*’■ ^ • . * - . ■ ■ — . • •• •. V •' ,* jfcLiSeA. m WB :f3 '■¥'> ■QH :■ i.-l .i : •11 1^ ip:^! SSK-i** ,>• :•■*••Mil mm mm Hi •,;;g'-^. sV-''- ’ v.'.; ^-/' LT’ CiZ r..-- ‘ - ■!• i” Ji\‘ II ^3 i*i A 1 Toi Mayor Crab«k 4 Orono Council M«mb«trs Planning Commission Chairman Kall«y Orono Planning Commission Mombors City Administrator Btornhardson Joann*. A. Habuath, Building 4 Zoning Administrator April 11, 1989 #1367 StttVon Harris, 3850 Wat*.rtown Road - Conditional Ua*». Portnit — Public Httaring Partinant Ordinanca - Saction 10.03, Subdivision 19 - A conditional usa permit is required for the alteration of land in excess of 100 cubic yards. Applicant proposes excavation of a pond 100' in diameter at a depth of 4'. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Extiibit B — Applicant's Addendum Exhibit C - Property Owners List - Plat Map - Planning Commission Minutes of 2/21/89 • Lot Survey - Topographic Survey Exhibit ExMbit Lxhibit Exhibit D E F G Saview of Application - A> 1 proposes the installation of a 100’ diameter -ond at a Jond‘‘il closest lot line The tha if tfl^dllfe'hVbrtei‘‘* functional. It is not planned for the encouragsMnt «,*,,« Vo* *5 face of application would suggest. Applicant's (Exhibit D) advises that the main purpose of the pond is to rid thr fiJld*" BanV’ “iVi «°ntent found in the low area ofof installed at a 3:1 slope to encourage the return K« K Jr - TA .^P?^icant proposes the fencing of the pond to prevent any y horses interference with the desired functioning of the pond. '•*# wz^ Iv . t iStN '(£4.;- . X f;n . t: Wr ' f X;V -* ' ' k.- •t- r:*r > •- *r^ -s - can bebt bu rcsolvtsd by neighbors. The City cannot deny an applicant's request based on concerns of this nature. The applicant has clearly satisfied the standards of Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 and seeks no variances to the standards. r». U -A% * '_• > i* . > |V -'*.'4. -f/. If Planning Conunission consiii<-.rs approval, staff would recommend that a condition of the approval be that the banks of the pond be installed at 3:1 slopes and that vegetation be restored upon completion of the final land alteration. 7^-. • .* r*.' r-,.- -4 >'■ » X HKMf*' ■r •*« ;^V,' 4 , f ■<' -f~.Vv.lv. hii, ..if;,v.v r-■■ *•* h‘ 4 r-7- r • v;1 fry.-- % * l •. * ■: . • ■ L, \r .‘ Vo-'i * •■ i’-' 5i;ft V -~'i.'’j=‘-: ” '^'n li !" rf Zoning Pile #1367 MLdltional CotsBenta and Planning yay 3, 1989 Reocmendutlon ** ^ Neighbors of the Harris property (Mr. Taylor to the wjunediate west and Mr. s Mrs. Butterfield to the immediate south) appeared before the Planning Commission to voice their concern, teth Mr. Taylor and Mr. Butterfield advised that there were old farm drainage tiles installed within the field that eventually drained under Watertown Road through the Butterfield property then finally to the Luce Line. Unfortunately^ no one was able to locate the placement of the existing underground tile system. The applicant has advised that if indeed in the prococs of installing the pond^ the underground tile system is discovered, he would agree to Incorporate the existing drainage system with the final design and functioning of the pond. Staff would suggest that if the underground tile system is discovered by Mr. Harris, that the City staff be called immediately to give appropriate direction. Based on the City Engineer's original comments that noted the minimal size of the watershed and that pond will increase retention. Staff did not feel it was necessary to acquire a drainage easement over the pond area. The Planning Commission disagreed in consideration of the Information from the neighbors concerning the underground tile system and recommended that a drainage easement be ta)cen over the pond and that if underground tiles were discovered during construction, that the City Engineer ma)ce a recommendation regarding an appropriate drainage easement be taken from the pond to Watertown Road. Mr. Harris agreed to these conditions. Mrs. Butterfield also voiced concern with the fact that a pond would now be located 50* from their property line. Staff note that the proposed pond location will be approximately 130 ^ from the road right-of-way with an additional 66* of right- of-way providing 200*-»- of separation before the Butterfield property line on the south side of Watercown Road. Please note your ordinances have no setback requirements for ponds. Remember the prime purpose of this pond is to provide a means to alleviate the moisture content within the soils of the low area of the property. The secondary purpose is a decorative pond. The pond will not be designed to attract wildlife. The applicant plans to fence off the pond even to his own horses. Tile Planning Comiiiission adopted the approval recosunendation subject to the applicant providing a drainage easement over the pond and depending upon the location of the underground tiles in relation to the location of the pond, that the appropriate drainage casement to the southern boundary be provided by applicant. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission's approval recoiiimendation• r ; ► t 1 ■f mm mK |k s V • .*' *.< ^ ft:- m.- *•—It iW t <iil I ~ I flil* “I i I ~t , ‘m.. ^ _JLL_1’A II 1 ' S ' i ■’ < ♦ V- » .11 II j|** . - • T* * * . t#' . • • «i ^ , M^V> ' •!^-J ri- ___ I n ,'.■ 4 r. . 1. P'; vXv |r. . ^ W‘> ' rv^- '■■■>•■■• -. 'T , ' -* ••'^'. *. ">1f‘ f- ''-rivnfe • ;> v-t f ‘■.C»-f,.s [:;'■ 'c: ?j"'" ‘'* lO; ^ r': -- -\n ♦▼♦•. - i -»• J - - V ,V --'..■,rv.. 1. V' '^V.'-v * ^•* • ^ • • - * ' * ‘ ' • *.'7’ ‘ .^. . ^\f! UlsefBB or m ruuniBG conmissioh kbbtzbg apul 17* 1989 xoazaG rzLS ii32S-^tzata coosm clob ovn«r. Tb«r« w«r« no furthar coanants from tha public ragarding this aattar and tha public haarlng van eloaad. It waa Bovad by Chalraan Kallay, aacondad by Planning Coaalaalonar Cohan* to tabla thla Itaa until tha approprlata grading plana ara aubalttad along with tha plana for tha ratantlon pond. Planning Coamlaalonar Johnaon Indlcatad that ainco thla aattar had coaa bcfora tha Planning Coaalaalon thraa tlaaa* ha did not wlah to aaa It again. Ha fait that th« Maysata Country Club ahould partlclpata in this mattar. Hotlon, Ayaa*5* Johnaon* Nay* Motion paaaad #1387 8TBVBI BAfaBIS 38S0 MATBiraCini BOAO COHOXTIOHAL 08B PBBMZT COHXXBOATKni OP POBUC HRARIIIG 8il0 P.M. TO 8t25 P.M. Mr. Harris w.ta preaant for thia mattar. Zoning Adjainlatrator Mabuath axplalnod that Mr. Harris was aaaklng a Conditional Use Parait to install a pond 100' in diaaotar and 4' daap. Tha pond could be claaalfiad as a decorative pond with a secondary purpoaa of providing drainage of jBolsture content of aolls surrounding tha pond araa. Mr. Harris pj^oposes putting a fanca around the pond to pravant his horsaa from Interfering with tha function of the pond. He intends to inaediately seed the banks. The pond will not change the existing drainage, but rather will provide greater retention. Chairman Kelley inquired as to where tha spoils would be placed? Mabuath was not certain* but the applicant indicated that he Intended to keep thaa on his property. Chairman Kelley asked if It would *oe necessary for the City to take a drainage and flowage easement for the pond? Mabusth stated that the pond was such a local retention area that such an easement may not be necessary. Kelley said that should tha property over be subdivided, the City may wish to have the uasesient. Be also suggested that the City be consistent with its easement policy. Planning Commissioner Johnson questioned the City's possible Bialntenance liability that may result from taking a drainage easement:. Mr. Robert Taylor informed the Planning Commission that in the beat of his knowledge, there was an underlying draintlla in tr.o area of Mr. Harris' proposed pond. Be questioned whether a pond was the proper approach to a drainage problem and expressed concern over the area reverting into a swamp that would back up his propsrtiye Mr. Lorsn Buttsr/lald intsrjsc^sd ^hs drslntils ran under his property all the vay to the Luce Line. Mr. Harris noted that if tha draintlla was there and functioning the grass in that area would not be consistently wat 'V- twwearap nwaf iu mm ' ■- j •a> ;• • ' t a«^. I {/■ -5 I’-. rr* if- ■ f \’ ' r*lii*>V j _'• • "#&< .• f^.V i»4 Vv '■•■’ . , •» v»‘ -r <v> » MnOSB OW THB FUUOII9G COMMISSZOIf NBETIMG APRIL 17, 1989 KMZRO PZLB «13<7 BASRZS<COamDBO that vould not bo a probloa. ' **f*/ ®*^y Buttorflold sold tb*t Mr. Barrla'a pond would cono within 50* of tholr proporty lino. 6ho aald that what would bo an attractivo addition for Mr. Harrla but would bo an unattractlva nulaance for hor. thi« *1V/*.K® co"i»«nto froo the public regardingthia matter and the public hoarlng waa closed. ^ ni »ov^ by Planning Commlaaloner Johnaon, aecondod by auggoatod that the flowage and conaervatlon eaaoBont takra aa far as the draintilo rune on the appllcanta proporty If that can be determined. Johnaon amended hia motion to includo ^ondltlon, Cohen seconded. Motion« Ayea>*6, Maya^O, Motion • 1C75 DAVID PRICB 2914 CASCO POIMT ROAD VARTAMCB COMmOATIOM or PUBLIC BBARZSG 8i2S P.M. TO 8i30 P.M. Mr. Price waa proaent for thia matter. Aasistanc Planning and Zoning Admlnlatrator Caffron eaid that the applicants were originally seeking an average lakoshore aet^ca Variance as well as a variance to slightly incroa«o nardcover. The applicants have since revised their proposal so that thu proposed addition would remain the same, but the patio area would be decreased. This would result in a decrease in h.rdcov.r 1„ Uh. 75-250- .on. to 27.34». Anoth.r .rpr....d m ■I 3 mm mmm «** ; • ii rV*‘. •' . • /. I 4H» jTm r M >«**# «r fH*! I If • I f|fP^l*H«I<»V^«*C T«WJ : ♦: • I' I 4 A • r : • A ^ tL* 1- !• M • ipv: Mat.i.H. > •7 rot^r#^ iV ’f ,/nV |i « * 1 Tr !'■ A l^ifW T*-^. , »Vf .fV- : 5J^ f • ^ •. • ^ Bohestroo ^Itoiene... Aixtefllk & Associates ,• f%#* SZVSZ,*^ -• " ^r. i^cdSTn tjn^wTT** 'X, •• •••*Sl'ii”* ■~o3•A^^pS^^•^'^S(1 • :■ y.c>1^a«a ~g?;tSrrAoT"*»***^'* iSVviSrs** r- H^irS. W 'i 'V__“r**" -'^v V i'-v’-r'J-'-i--- • . • ^ 4 • * « / n. "^ra. JSrViTjr*'*' ~ ^ ■>' -** :.%:^^r* - t'** *A»;aK f' '.t 4>^»< m !■:-■ ;■ r-r:-.4g^r-%^^ ... * ^ ., ift^^gS^ajAprU-.urXMt *•’ ■.‘••r^-* ** • ;or ;'*:: .• - "■ - -Bo* «« •••.. •>.; .:: ' .Crjr.t*l i«y, 101 * 53323 . ^ . ' ■ J—ma Itobutli' ►' mj. •J 5 - *''r’ -'■/ y. . f.;^T ^*1 '■- ' ;■*'w' •* > • •• r ♦ - *t -■^1 "T^Iii '■Od 1S9«1367e^sJji',::X,»«ri.-- • •* < V V.’^ •* 'A ^ • rj^ •.'iT-L v'e ^-1 . - .‘Sh^ V, hS>3 t • .1 •. • X - • ^ ^ w^ • ». • </ 4.i/i'lfen .4 % ^ * Tf W7(S O mt j««n«;V.. v» ' -<«•*-w V. .* • ^ •.. • ... .. , tj^ -^.E*:'^*^* •^•^^•••^ thA'poodlag art* propofad for tli^ ■ 7 Tv". ..C’ r.. ;- '. .*»«■ *Ppro«JjMt*ly 10 acrtt. * * * pr<rrld« vator aterat# tot 41. V. • rf* . . . .f’ • ^ *v ••*** •u .Vv.'kP. • •' V\ • »««»• f- — , . - .» J. •A ► • «i’.'t ______ r\ , •••-•M i • it! • • ^ • ^tha 'proi ir tba araa ' •■“ * ■'•.e* *S.** »- - / •U. >^\y^ry * ■ ■' . •. ________ - •«...■ I .•" ^•r-r 1^... _____ ^ ^ A ^ ao7 qBaatldna,-W..V-■ ..... « »f A.> ^ • v>nr-*^; .... *«Wt^*v9HJip WM'jecJi AmiLXX i -ASsbcUTIt, V* ‘-7^ JR • «» wo f rr'-?-> -vU' ,i MCiU jBook *wr f .'Cir^^ w M • N-. .-. *n^-S4 • .* f* :?S^J ♦ *» r.f ••% 4r*t V 4 KrH: ’<4 WS ~ w < .^( . La- a . a: c:fe^«.> :»• M.*» > * «I>-4Mn|«qo , 'CK t' • . *. .. .' • ^ • ' • ' - 'f' • .^<<-' ^ . »^J ^ ->«^ — jf^tgL » , ' »• .•" ! M ' *' • - 1* '♦ * •* '^*' ■"'*•■*.• V‘ . • - V •'* * •V' -■ ’ * , ": ’i »'»4 -. * 'h •* ' ‘ ‘mV ^‘ *' “ . •i\‘K-’V . .' . . ■ • • • • ' E^ r •.'■ WM /V CITY OF ORQNO •l.w« *> ' H • .'• I h • ^m.f*j f*i •f ^•1«1 - r^T^TTT.Blifi |fcv ^ •- I 0. ^1 * • :# .^ *^ rZi1 m''&: fL- l•9«•l•I«■ V-T*l • I l*I»l I* h \ w ‘ ><■ m r* El¥.i mil *••■ “ • ■ , • *i ” • i »- V» * * '' - 4 * • * . • » f. 4#-^ :rf; fj. ■ . .NtTi - .• ,_... , ■ '■-'■■.■•’».•*.'i '• A City of ORONO crrv OP ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ___2629 4 , .• City Council has conaidared this aoDllcatlon oV tss*.ss?*«5 proposed use on the health, safety,and welfare of the communitye 5. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use Tk*^ will its use depreciate surrounding property w?li K that the proposed level of use of the property Jeeeping with the intent and objectiv-sa of th^ zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Tay COKCLDSIONS, ORDER AMD CONDITIONS -V' ¥ iC\:: ■*• Citv ronn,.?! I findings, the Orono Zoning r i hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to*^ oernilt the^Jirvei^bv^’L^i^^' * *' i^pth as shown on subject te'thJ fc AVvi„"c,'d7t?o“.1 fleliiJlJ? pond are to be installed at % 3:1 slope tofacilitate the regrowth of vegetation. aitcMtionsf^” restored upon completion of the final land !• Applicant to provide a drainage easement over the retention pond and upon the final recommendation of the City nginecr, hereby agrees to grant the City additional drainage easements over existing underground tiles that drains to the southern boundaries of the property. V 1 f./ . k-‘ '>■ I Page 2 of 4 > .. ,r - .>♦•* 'v Mk l-'i K »2 ‘'>1 f .MM* ■ H ‘ m- .t.v j: ... M- kt Mf mmimmmBSimmsfsmm i ?! 'I A• . ^ V 1 JI . OF I I GRONO I City of ORONO t-.• •• RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ___2629 Authority groAtod horaln and tomlnato anyoiadmmmMaor, and .hall ba punl.hablo a. a < L tiixBflcXfa hi^A ®®olution And on botiAXf of tha recording of thiTr^JSlutlo"niV^^tho proparty. roaolutlon In tho chain of tit la of May, 1989. ATTttSTs Adopted by tha Orono City Council on this 8th day of >rothy PropartyC/0wner(.)— —*------- lyor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OP HENNEPIN )• 0. thl. eth diy b.for. M oo H.m„, M.y'r ; CitV c ArV .?; ;.*.*• <="'>•1' ‘ Dorothy M. Bunlcipal corporation and ^id Orono, a Minnaaotaof tho City. ^ instrument waa axacuted on bahalf Cv !£,««« K. SCH£fFl£R . »yu€ - «M«sot4 hinnuim countt My CoiBBia.ion Ei^lreS®^"".... ' ' Page 3 of 4 "P .ikl: mm •' 4 ^'•v. 5: chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator June 9, 1992 #1741 Rodney J. and Shannon K. Batzlaff - 1115 Brown Road South - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-IB, Rural residential, 2 acre minimum Pertinent Ordinances 1. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) - Variance required for placement of accessory structure in front of front line of principal structure. Accessory structure to be located 22’ in front of principal structure. Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (F) - Side yard setback for accessory structure. Required = 10' Proposed » 8' Variance = 2' or 20% A- 10' setback is allowed for structures less than 750 s.f. in area. Total area of accessory structure is 440 s.f. Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (D) - Front street setback. Required =50' Proposed = 2o' (edge of 33' of right-of-way) 43' (from traveled road) Variance =30* or 60% Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Review of lot coverage. Note hardcover standards are not pertinent to this review as property is not located within 1,000' of the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka or French Lake. 1^-‘If?;:Total lot area » 14,824.25 s.f. (approximately) Allowed « 2,223.6 s.f. or 15% Proposed = 1,802.4 s.f, or 12.15% No lot coverage variance is required. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List - Plat Map - Adjacent Property Owners Acknowledgement Form - Work Sketch/Site Plan - Spec Sheet - Section - Proposed Site Plan - Existing Survey C D E F G H I ‘1 m'r il%rw ' • .:'j ,. ' , ■, Ti r' ' ;<* Zoning File #1741 June 9, 19^2 Page 2 of 2 Description of Request Applicant proposes the installation of a 20' x 22' detached garage within the street yard of the residential property requiring setback variances and a variance to the section that would require placement of a detached garage to be placed either at or behind front line of principal residence. The garage is placed 20' from the actual County Road right-of-way and 44* from the traveled road. Doors face away from the street with turnaround provided on site. The proposed structure is to be located in between the two mature trees. Lot coverage is maintained at 12%. The City has received no negative comments from the two adjacent neighbors who have signed off on the Neighbors Acknowledgement Form. Hardship Statement Please review Exhibit: A# Applicant’s Addendum# The shape of the lot prevents structure from being placed adjacent to principal structure nor is there sufficient area to allow an access drive to rear of property without the removal of mature tree. The garage shall be placed on site so that trees will not be threate'^'. 1 by construction. Garage is consistnet with variances oppro- >d for adjacent neighbor for detached garage in street yard at property located at 1135 South Brown Road, ■■tr Options of Action : : Approval as proposedr OR i M wm Approval as emiendedr OR "'■■i Denial.■i If this application is approved, the City must ask that the proposed 20' x 22' detached garage be designated on a legal survey of the property prior to scheduling the application before the Council. m.Am :v;r v;'am ■¥ y V- ililfa ; i-. A-t .'V -*■:.rmrn .- A .r?. . x»' , rWT^ i .k «>1 •5 \ aXY OP OROHO - VARIANCE APPMCATIOH I“^tr.rJ;:crPe:rK?: -PPUcatlon .ee. 4 JL CITY OF OKuHQ FmHCB OFFICE 135u^iiod^^ property ihformation //5' f?r?AK/M ftcAQ 05/22/9. Site Address KsS'i4iruu.r."/-"* included f*» Date Prsjpecty Acquired— '^ .7^ ^ parcels of land. I (do )“pro°perTy: ’^ residential ____^other(specify)---------------------- Present use of P^oP^^Y* ^------- ^Zonin^ District■ r\ —■ 33—— —--------—— — ~ f V, O ^ H *7 (/5 ““ (d 3 3 I (month/year)i I I ■ V ' ‘ ■'■ Phone (home) *** (d 33_L applicant ^ i ^ C ^ 0 _ and K« ufitTZ-LA^^one (work) ^(f)Q*“^'2.CX3 ----- Name ISODNfeT -------------------------—----------- ■^<h-^ -g). South city:^dM^!^X^__2ip^/•J i -ry OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home)/! Name Phone (work)_•1 Address:City:Zip: '”' , , ,7 '-«■■■■ ’> per»cH£|) a^Siae VARIANCES REQUIRED Estimated Construction Cost $_ C>0OO eOQ Lot Area ____ Lot Width ■<.Setbac)c; ^ Front Side Other (specify) Hardco'ver Rear _ Lot Coverage j^verage Lakeshore S conditions — ^ M gm —m;i-S4--{r.ns oreventing compliance wirn ^ _____4. r>r•.Uy^V‘h^/i/klfnnP fMir t- .i >. ■ required SDBMITTA1,s““’°^ additional sheets if necessary) \, f^—~s—followincr informa tion must be submitted bv thi» inline date 1b order lor year appiictic to be c^siSlref ^ Completed Application Form Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of p-fnanr^o a isn-j ^ a. 348-3271). ^ Finance A-603 Govt Center property owners list). ‘rS'°.s'r, sn:^'““ssj"?,«.«V in 63cleV4T3fT ----cwiu pjroposeo elevations) if fi V cV grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll") AS an :dd:ndSn to this^t™^ ^ <=°Py 8%»xll»).7. —anv“/>fapplication, please attach a separate'list of 8 ^ this application*■ Itional items as may be requested by city staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this aoDlicatlnn mremember that your variance anoH«n-i«« -^gn rnis application. Please jjtfomation has not been incH^Q^--------~ ^^__above applicant•S SIGNATURE The applicant agrees to provide all information required or time not covered hi ® '/A"' *=o pay additional fees (stafft!re“no*t cLe«d°by"or^tinif7e*e°"' .ees .srarr Incurred in review of this aooilLt,' consultant expenses • true and^o“^%t%^i\=be‘^.;s; o^^ Applicant's Signatur^tV>lVii-n'^ ^ ^ ^yL supplied is 'mm OWNERS SIGNATURE Date ■ 2.1 2-/n 2- Owner's Signature v.v.r.!r.L%’*x “,i"'suvr £-“.v.a”" ^'"^InTc^tssll^ M«t^na"^\^‘^* i”‘° *=*'« officesirdl^rbe^ore'the mrd Monday of each month.- ission and Council. If an applicant isreview meetings of the Planning O e^orlz^d \VeTt attend*ln^yl«^’%lii^^^ a"a“9e“ents*to have— _xf x-,_j _ . y ur place and to advise the Building & Zoningan Office of this change prior to the meeting. ,• >• ■ . ^ ■■ :1s®’?' . 4"' '.A ■ ■* ■ ■ f- ■vi •■■ rittijA'A ,c j I' . ... -w V Kj..eUa Ii. • i' ■* ■ • ■ . V - ^ • i V y.' -I■•<«■■ ■:% i' • >. V V... li,. B;* .'•, .'•■■’^'.‘S- ■ .jli"K H Q "O55l§3 *0 m -o m > » |*§S H Q *TJ ► 2 » ? m 9 H Q "o 2 > r 30 fn > » N. -< > > m 2 o o ;d > o a 2» SI m 5 ^ S S m > SI \ •< _ > > m 2 o o SI > o § m ^ ill > 30 \ > Cl> n g m 2 o o 9 o SI o o O' o ’ v- . ^/.•':w . .V . . • . .-r . ■ ?r,;- ■;■:■■' • V ‘ •• ' ..-/■’s;-. •:: * . , ♦ ■ ■ 3 •• *. <■ , •- . •V - .- • ^ - •>>.■. -*.«•• *" i-* **!*•*••''** ► % *. ' *^ . • W- , • A;/* » •* ' ■>i 4 . ........................... t 1 * *’ • -. •f ‘ 0 M </> (/I o w SI M Z M 0» •< U4 M p» M (/> O » W H r- o o M > 2 m o r- M -< J I r" o M 01 r- 0* X X M > Q M M x4 -< X O r- r- I O r* p- ro 2 o X M Q M 2 X n > X (/I ^ ^ o 01 X ^ o 01 n (/) o M X 04 is» M 04 oi r“ X M O O O 04 > M > M 01 -< .r* < OB MfSI O M . > _ a r- o M H X M > M OI m 0 1 So-^25I > •• r- M ox Q OI in X r- o X01 > M 04 C/I X o ^ 'll X X M no r- M 01 o Mm o X M X X O 04 > M O M 01 -< M O •• M Sil^SwK- H O •< O > X O I Q > M XX H OP 2 2 cn N X ^ X r- Q I X > > X r^» o X -n 2 04 Ol on 01 C/I 2 X r» 04 O 4N >0 09 M >1/10s p r V- in ^ M C. C- O 04 m •>!2 1 s i ®04 m m O > 0 01 i j. C/l C/l O M X O *V.^% „ ri > > .1 . ,^;u ; :a, 5 § 1615 af^lia r”W;■.•>; O X X n ss • . -. ■■.-V*^ >*V . .V'-^ • %•’. • j. . ’ » . * •*.%•_ -,*.•'• X » T- .* • , . • ► n n 04 M o . ’ ' ■■ '• ' ^ (O •* ' '---A ' vS<ia>W4^x,y • • Jg . •->; ^ •. ^ c. * tfcSKKfXi’.'--‘tv- . : >• AVy»- . ^ a o X »-• .-fi n m X o X H X m ^ X m X m c/l H m MS53 13- X M C O O 04 > M > M 01► M > M < M 2 > MSI o m M X K* O O O 04 > M C M 09 H X _ C O> M m -1 ■ ■ «i *.'-?-"v _ 0* r- I S. r- r> o o c. Q 04 01 X > X C. ®m X mm o X X Q I > X X na H 2 IH V > >•/- y..-» , X n09 H n > m -< o o ». ■ • .r • - ’if -K ■V ■• „■...••• ■ *-M *r.^ ’ ■*, . *'. - V f -S •‘ ■'‘>V > -X. • * I • 1 ■ • '• ‘tr* ' .4 1.- ■ ••-♦ * 4. '•v,««*r *'• » •*T *«,'4 .*- *• :.r< ...... .“ sr*:. ■•'". .■ . T.'r"'-—'■ . • -V^V.' • ■ i n M c/l c/l O 04 X M X M 09 •< 04 M > M C/l o X ro H r- o o M > X ni ^ o r- M -< X I f- o M 25“*25t: •< X o r- P- * I O r- r- ro o M X X O 04 X M X z M 09 -< 01 < •< M c/l 01 r- r- 01 H r- f- 01 M> 09 M M o r- X c/l c/l I Q M 09 X W ►-•> 2 -< X vj -< X •< O M M M fsi 01 m m o > 01 M H c/l C. C. O > I09 n O M X X X X 09 M 2 Q X X X >1 X M M Q I 2 c/> C/l X 119H -H 2 04 01 X m m 01 O ± Z X 04 ^ cn o ^ 'll « —.M 2 2 c/l oo m o H ^ 4'if -.»• ■ v,--.,t>i t^r- >• • . •• ■••■* '.^vL- ’■. — t* : •, • . «/•• . * ’ *-.*^.* * . .;V ‘ .• -.,■ ■■ . • ■ ;y. : - .' r> ,■■v‘. ' ♦ ■ • : . ’ -. .;• ■... ■ ^ ' '■ 1 *te-^ ' *,. . . T * ■■■ ■■fV\ ' rts • ■ • • •* * , * * A'-*,"* 'A • . * '. * .- '. r . ■».’.•*. -,v' ■ . , a 2s ■A 0 2«m 3*2**2*2- • IT 2-2 ^•A » • 4 ••••• !••••*U L y»SOi SB 3B 3B Adjacent'property Owners- Acknowledgement Form I (we) V^HA^a C (^j-<°^^ [print name(s)J Cf // ^ v-A^ [print address] u * have reviewed the pla ns refetred*" to as Land Use property located at Application Nocatiuii . — ^ 4-u,*. in ^Axecuting this acknowledgement, I (we) am . I (we) understand disapproval of the property or use (are) not asked to declare pp council that I (we) am (are) aware of but merely to confirm tL proposed neighbor's project or use the improvement plans and that tne p y requires Council approval. v/^y.yL<L ..L vv y Property Owner Date Date ^Property 'U I (we)fe. ^ m is4ervson of [print name(s)] have reviewed the plans^f^r^h^rc^o^ed^^^o^veme^ nave - ... property located at lj_l Application No. X (we) understand that in tf%”rTpertV- (are) not asked councii that I (we) am (are) but merely to ’'^Lt tL proposed neighbor's project or use i, the improvement plans and that tne p e requires Council approval. Property Owner r.\- • '■ ■ i Property Owner If you have any f “Lmlt yout’L^Lw''to tht Bu\7diL “s LL^fnro«- a\^'>l“?t^lrda^y^-"rtrtU scheduled meeting date. t ■ ■ 1 of the and Use (we) am or use i^are of or use ^-S of the ind Use I (we) am or use /are of or use riew of .ding & h ’ ■: v:/ m SUSSELGARA iSES “';|*ORK OBliEH I- 1852 COMO AVENUE ST. PAUL. MN 55108 Ptrmit flhfAr^ * Ltgal Description_________ Lot _ _____________ Blit ______________ Add'n._ Value________________ Type Const. SLAB: By Owner Approx.□ !n 2-starting *»oints only S.P.L. _________________ S.S.P.L. R.P.L. Alley JOB ADDRESS^//5^ ^A-^ruTY^ HOME phone .’ ¥/ NAME BUS. PHONE:. BLOG CODE AREA_Z2a. SALESMAN^^’^’*^_ CONTRACT DATE, FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Blocks Sod Removal Sand Fill___ House^SZ BIki. Oallvary Waterproof_ Back Fill ___ Other _____ Re-b«r F. Street_______ Other dF C/ TOTAL •A- *. D Square With _ OSod Rem. • 8v□a.b.u___: Dfl Grade Point -£l.Can<ill,it _____ D Blocks: QBy Owner'QBy Sussei OWtr.proof: QBv Own. OSy Su$. ^Backfill; OSy Own. OBy Susset □ Maintain 8' Total Wall height Including Blocks OR □ Maintain 8' Wall Height on Top of Blocks Block Si^e (Top course) G 8" □B'j__G4”_ Wall Height olherlhan'S'□ •• »•' k . .Vt < V*r -.14 # *. A ■ ■ ^ . I k -j i .. ,i . * 3l5- » ..........j „ ; I,. ■ . *» 1 I . ■ ■-----—..i_; - - ♦ • %-. * , f .-. i ^ L __; : I : . « - - I f H ■; ■ : ■ f I »-i •--S' »• . i t-i. ^r;'! . A. r Existing garage: No □ J Detached □ Attached Yes 0 5i^e of existing: Existing garage will be: D Left as is E Converted to L.S. * By owner J Removed By: Owner Q Sussei □ unk Must Be Removed By Owner -duliz/tr. ...i . J * •I- ■« «>. k *• , k.-. 4.-4- , : ‘ r i-- - ♦ ■•**^**' takes visible • □ Yes ® No irvey available • DYes u No Special instructions from Owi'ier; ACCESS fC Good O Fair □ Poo: ArfMrmAT£Ly - .. «... V « AT C/jCTSESt- pj/N' ' ... ^ I^MTt Af |t ' Hi i] —P.9 ?.: i .• ♦ , r i‘fi { i I* 1 H. il* V. ^ v»> I2I • u. GAftAGE ESTIMATE FORM .MN661C8 MMri' f • .'If IWLi -! ( I • ';i' ll'iilif! lAQ^' it^A- 8./ i .1^ i^fi'n.■ 1 ‘>* *'’i’i ' ! ■ 'ff••^<J^:.•!^^v■ ■ ^‘i i- I. m [j; ;{;:■} ’j.u.i '•} :• iiS kiJfi;. . 4 1 f : !•tt iV t. 1 • * * i .i "j ! 1*1’•' if:' SIrcie U; .. ,: D;14 x22 □ 16x22 [; 9! €'l 1 9n$/on ts width 0 rjb'" L: 10 x22 - c; 20 x22 :L 22 x22 r 24 x22 Other •;i r I , □ •‘Ntar-BIH* . Framed by SUSSEL ^ "All-Bntr ;t Bullt by SUSSEL Detached if | v □ Attached 'M.- • )! •’ 1 ! • • f } I* if U f.if •I I f j» pv^hang (Circle One)*j t'I.□ REVERSE GABLE!'i !^JJ I'S 18" e Overhang 24." »• Eave Overhang (Circle One)! ij. 12'10' !! . }• ■1 ; > ir □ HIP ' Eave Overhang (Circle One) • 18':. I 24" ^ • r * ' *5,- , e.r,, 1 f» , i .1 M f 1; lerglas^hingles w th exterior graie roof sheathing.‘1 H i [; i' M- I J r I,I I .1; I •• <i.t ‘•, ! * * I « I e #. T ,!#• * |. i;hi D 2x6 ’s Convention =' ^taming ^ Manufactured Truases I V • i 2x4 ’s a Wall Height 8' ’ ;• Or i t i HII^Q ^ i/;!!"Cirayi ‘te •1 25/32'Bildrite □ 1/2'Plywood •’ a-.□'1/2'Wafer Board □ None' T4 '/3* fi#:#R:' lep i'iiai ime iJ . - r ' u i'i -I Wood Panel t , (fj.Kif O Glass, L' NoGI"' f ■:, I.' i I4 riii * ! •! f* (I •'■S' I ! O Raised Panel i !!□! : i! ;• i' °i ■■is: U Raised Redwood i 'it Flush -• iTexturedl1 - - 1. .': • i . H . i‘ .•; t 1 I 1 .1 1 \ • •i> • t '.r^r Steel □ Rihbed ■ "i I'.* i JUl M .. . • I {{ ! f Of Yes . V-iG No ;'v- ■' rid^ Windows:’i ;i . j.« I : ii i[J ■* □ Wood ^ Steel xfa’Si ; m j; SI Included']* 12. BLOCKS: ] ;By Purchaser - ' "fwojh)'^'' '''■ fitj'l' -ij Sussel • '“1 !; ^rchaser I ?□ iD Id Owner t .t i pi*-!. I?::! *____________ - t ual Monthly Installments i m .'•jytrx ^ I ' ' F! »TOfaC^COST *7 "' ' '' ?:'iT.yjL' r f . i w mmv>m.’Ta^^W'’r SlISSELGARAGES ROOF: t^GABLE^ REVERSE GABLE tf HIP 7mm “i:!,vu , • HAVE OVERHANG: J3L RAKE OVERHANG SEAL DOWN SHINGLES WITH PLYWOOD OR WAFERBOARD ROOF SHEATHING AND 15 LB. NOTE; 1) Roof approved by Minn. State Building Dept, as meeting Mmn. State Code Requirements of 30# snow load. 2) Hip roofs consist of 2" x 6" rafters, 2 " x 6" cross ties 48 ' O.C.. 2 ’ x 8" hip rafters and no pfywood gussets are used. RAFTERS: Trusses STUDS: T x 4" iLL SHEATHING:--------------------^ )1NG: /? ^ 24 ’* O.C. m 7m7..... F * V ^ ERHEAD DOOR HEADER; Double 2" x 12" or 2 ♦ Micro Lams----- Slao on grade construction approved per Minnesota State Code. Bator to State Building Code Letter Number 11. SLAB. 4" WITH MESH 6” x 6‘ #10 Gauge 2" X 4" Studs SU‘ •? ■) ..r'iL't^.rSiklt, ■.• ■'T' t ' rfik'Jr . ■ . ‘ .V mm 1 /2" X 7" Anchor Bolt 2" X 4” Treated Bottom Plate 1 ^ 0 ^ Grsds —j : r t ■•'it Ji... ... . ,.y .;*4^»-. -1 v3 I 6 r Tot •iLV - Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator ■ U,-' From; Datet Subject t Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator June 10, 1992 #1742 James and Amy Laing, 500 Orono Orchard Road Variance - Public Hearing lr-W'<Pertinent Ordinance 1. Section 10.28, Subd. 5. A. t V VP;* •» Front/ ‘reet setback (Orono Orchard Road) Required = 50'. Existing = 36'8". Proposed ** 4 3'7 ". Variance » 6'3" m- It fc.***./*. B, ■ ' .w.’ '.i v^'-r.Vv; Side/street setback (Dickinson Street) Required « 50'. Existing = minus 2.1". Proposed »= 19'1". Variance * 30'9" or 62%. >Vi -'is ■c.Rear setback (12* alley not considered street) Required « 50'. Existing »= 43'6". Proposed = 10'6" (18'6" to traveled portion of alley). Variance » 39'6" or 79.2%. Review of lot coverage. A.Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C). Total area * 19,185 s.f. Allowed “ 2,877.75 s.f. or 15%. Proposed « 2,722.07 s.f. or 14.1%. Total lor area =» 38,377 s.f. if 6 lots are legally combined. Allowed » 5,755.5 s.f. or 15% Proposed * 2,722.07 s.f. or 7.09%. Property is not located within 1,000' of Lake Minnetonka and not subject to the Shoreland Regulations of the City. j ^ •••S' mm I ^V ’ ^-’ni Cr'-" ■ it-V'-* ' * •■;• Zoning Pile #1742 June lOr 1992 Page 2 List of Exhibits A - Application Bl-2 - Applicant's Addendum C D El-2 P Gl-2 Property Owner's List Plat Map Survey Floor Plan Building Elevation Description of Request Applicants propose a family/room garage addition to the east side Of the existing residence and a 16'x28' bedroom addition to the south side requiring the approval of multiple setback variances. Applicants own 6 I'^ts. Lots 22 through 24 and 1 through 3 have been legally combined binder two separate PID's but because of the 12' alley separatioUf applicants have been unable to legally combine all parcels. The City will attempt to file the legal combination at the City offices. If County refuses the legal combination, the City will ask applicants to execute a special lot combination as a condition of the multiple variance approval. Though applicants' addendum Exhibit B, suggests that a rear setback variance would not be required upon the legal combination, staff would hold that the rear setback for a principal structure would still be required because of the 12' alley. In previous applications dealing with setback from unpaved alleys where oroperties are legally combined on both sides of alley, the 10' setback was still required. The legal combination^ 11 have an impact on lot coverage. In reviewing Exhibit D, it 'i noted that the County has approved previous legal combinations - i ^.-operties divided IF by the 12' alley so it appears that the County has already approved similar legal combinations. The applicants also propose the removal of the existing detached garage that encroaches 2' within the Dickinson Street right-of-way and the temporary garden shed. ' The City cannot consider the vacation of the 12' alley as it is currently used by property owners to the south for access. Current proposal shows the detached garage with doors facing towards alley. Applicants will also achieve access from 12' alley. Although actual setback to alley is shown at 10'6", the garage will be 18'6" from the portion of the traveled or developed alley right-of-way. A new curb cut onto public right-of-way must be approved by the Public Works Department. It appears that the limited setback distance will necessitate portions of the turn around to be located on the public right-of-way and should also be approved by the Public Works Department. J r- . '«*■ .■ j;.• '• '."i-.' V.. ' < ritf .• '^‘ •v^. >. N- Zoning File #1742 June 10, 1992 Page 3 - •‘•:.w . •• •• . v*‘ -•■ kmHardship Statement Please review Exhibit B, applicants have provided a detailed hardship statement for the City's consideration. Hardships are reviewed as follows: 1,PR-IB, 2 acres standards are to be applied to the building site that is less than a 1/2 acre in area. VLocation of house on property it • - • ^IPIp;J0 Current detached garage encroaches Dickinson Street right- of-way and creates hazards for users of Dickinson Street and adjacent alley because structure impacts siting distance and is a potential hazard for users of public road. Location of garage in relation to crest of the hill and adjacent accesses. Location of mature trees to the south.-W;.M: m Persistent surface runnoff/drainage problems necessita^.e the retention of a low depression or retention area within the south yard of the property. Options of Action A. Approval as proposed or as eunended or Denial. Any approval of this application must include the following conditions: Applicants to either legally combine all 6 parcels or execute a special lot combination recognizing the property as one unit. Removal of existing detached garage and garden shed located adjacent to Dickinson Street. Applicant to obtain driveway permit for new curb cut onto alley off Dickinson Street and to provide a detailed plan of driveway to be installed as portions of backout apron will be located in 12' alley. Vi' ':faaia Wi > - :- V.' ‘ :v ‘X^.A »» Zoning File #1742 June 10, 1992 Page 4 4. '41 Based on historic drainage problems on the property, applicants shall provide a grading and drainage plan with building permit application which would address new drainage needs as a result of these improvements. I,:- ~ tesilSiKi? . ^.:■f-hi'riie/ri ■tei a ‘n ., ■ t m-:?- '' i 4, . :^5P; V .■ ■•■ A IrJ ■ ^ * ■• •■• •■ •• Sj-’--' '■m,.U .XMmmm4i is-'-gyal , f-v •- j.; - ; T. .' ii-pnn CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION . V Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100 00 (no change from original application Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) #1 *7 A A PROPERTY INFORMATION <» Site S~Og <>tiO>UO oo\-z, ■ : *V'- Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) 3ft M*1 •* *2.3 “Si Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Dat^ Property Acquired ~ I»^** oC^_ _ _(month/year) l((dob(do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Preset use of property: X residential -other (specify) Zoning District: cm CF OROh^Q Fm RCE OFFICE 1350200000 01 QER CHECK TL 250.00 RECElRI-lHm YOU ^242650 cool ROl T06: OtTA Afi fi C-i^/ 1%-i- APPLICANT Name TTA-IM^^/itny / A-iA^/(n i<bO £d City:i^lA^^:^4i5^b_ zip: Phone (home) _ _ _ _ _ Phone (worlc) ^7 Z» Address ir"OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address: __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $~ — Describe request in detail H^TTACi^'h Afjy : / r7xW 6P f^liy tPOQA^ ^ (FL^AJS, AT77^H^1>^ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Y Setback: A Front X Side Rear_ _Average Lakeshore 1^— ^ T \ Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DBSCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: ArTA^trxsro (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered completes 1. 2. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. 4. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include "hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll" for reproduction). 5._ _^Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%'*xll''). 6. __Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll''). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and coi^rer^P to the best/^f his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signatur CHMERS SIGMATOKS Date *4. The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agent J, Commission members, and Council for purposes of investiga­ tion and verificationcQf^his requ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month.* Applicants must be present at all ncheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is iinable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building fi Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. • V i ti .1.T ' ■111 'L -■■■/ft'.r.‘--. i • . -'I '/ 'm* • .f *• « •■?. •■'i "‘-ft# Variance Application Supplement .^■■1 ■■■ ■ ■•\ '>:< DATE: May 21, 1991 TO: Planning Commission and City Council Members FROM: James and Amy Laing RE: VARIANCE APPLICAION ON P.I.D. #38 02-117-23 31 0012 A review of our property survey and proposed additions has identified the need for three setback variances if we are to proceed with our plans. The underlying issue arises from the fact that we are living in a RR-IB single family residential zoning district, requiring a minimum lot size of 2 acres. Whereas, the lot we are proposing to develop on (Minnetonka Bluffs Block 13, lots 22, 23, 24) is less than one-half acre in size. I will address each Variance separately and explain the circumstances unique to the property and request. The proposed family room and attached garage addition on the enclosed plans would require two variances. I would like to address the set-back along the north side of the property (Dickenson St.) first. The current garage is set so close to the street that cars parked in the driveway stick out into the road. As a result, cars driving by are required to steer around these obstacles. This is further-complicated by our garage being situated on the crest of a hill and an alley and neighboring driveway entering Dickenson at approximately this same location. In addition to the congestion, the garage and cars obscure the vision of drivers leaving the alley. There was an accident at precisely this location two years ago. By placing the garage back an additional 20 feet and changing our entrance to the garage to enter and exit from the atiey, all of these safety concerns could be eliminated. Finally, although the proposal places the new family room and garage 20 feet from the property line, in reality it would be approximately 35 feet back from the edge of the Dickenson St. v'l . , . - : -t ■ . 1 The second variance issue relates to the proper'.:/ line to the east along the alley. What is unique to thi tuation is that we also own the property (lots 1,2,3) to tra e.iost. It has been recommended we begin proceedings to legally combine all 6 lots for tax purposes (if allo%^ed). If we are successful there will not be a need for a variance. ■m . V,.‘r- ¥-■ r,; y . *“W ' V ,. ‘ ■ ■ - ftv 1 ■ hlA •i .s .,1^^.. .. V' v-J- ■i ^f- Ml May 21, 1992 Page 2 Variance Appllaction f ti u;- «.^,7 •• • 1 A ii / O ,-• . 1 Jy i V,, * ^-.p If we are not permitted to combine the lots, we are very willing to take the necessary steps to legally "bind" lots 1,2,3 to lots 22,23,24 so that they may never be sold independently. As a final note, I do not believe this addition could be added anywhere on the property without a set-back variance unless it was built to the south which would require us to cut down several very mature trees. ■ The third variance issue involves the 50 foot setback requirement from Orono Orchard Road on the front (west) of our property. The rationale for the location of the bedroom addition to the south is primarily based on the contour of the property. Our property is located in a depression, receiving considerable run-off from rain and snow from the north and south. To minimize the effect from the north, the city installed drain pipes to redirect the flow. However, to the south the problem persists and we have installed drain tile to keep our basement dry. If we were to attempt to satisfy the setback requirements and locate the addition to the east of the proposed location, it would place it in a depression where standing water results from run-off. Finally, the the new addition would be 43.7 feet from the west property line and approximately 54 feet from Orono Orchard Road. I appreciate everyone's time and consideration in this matter Please let me know if I can provide any additional information. . t % .: •. j teiHm ■ ■■ ^ ':v. /I v^ :'■- mm imimM 1 v;V ■*-s« •• . .'y- • r ••• ^ ' - A •-^* '0 0 O' - ,. - ' ■ I. • ■ . - I • - - •* . '. ' » • . ' . . :. •• ‘ . / . . . . • . . • •. H Q ^ « O 0 . O O . <!> .. C V.. ‘ .: J V.'! to #: i 1111 -; ^ V-) ' ' .-';K , • . •■ . • o U> O ■•• V V-.'>>•■ ;■ '■ , • . ,. - . V^2 ‘ •* •*• CA -• 4 r . • ' ,^* ., . • '>■ - * • “ * v* ^ . • * ... *^'• .* 2 ‘ . • •' • . ... . • '* *■*•.■ t . ' • ' ^\ • * ^ ■• • . •*. * • .^ • . •* ni 8 M 5 g- t . * * 5 A .. ••>r>' « ■ ^ m rtt p ^ a S X:°iis 5S==§S 1/1 > (A XI ;d o o C H a o I>I ^ -o X X M ii§r? M r. ^ '*■♦'; ■ • ’•S .' -t . V-/ ^W*0R|'h... .-J. . •• * C.-.. . . ^ i'i. ■:'■•. ' • ..•■*■. 5 H X X S 5 m (A vn H M Ora m > > P I "®32SCJ o» M O X O>?X O >1 .. • 4? • P^«:i XXX O m m — : ' -1 - ^ • t . - ■«i'»». * '. • Xa * ^ ^3 P O M Z «• •• X ^o a *X X X 2 IN’o a wvn X o o ^ S X X X X M X rn m > oa X X oX X o ui (A > > giS^ .«■ . •> .fT.. o VI . • . I* . ? •.T. ^ >• * . ’ t r .• •* * ■ M. 1 •»( • 9 , :. r^• »v ,. t*-' "••• ‘ •? 1. ' i4.‘A. >*■».• CA rvf ni o iMH o o o O 01 » X X £-o > > o _> (A X X vn oC H o a M £«CC38 .A/ .„,; ... cVx:^_^ ^*. =-..• • ^ o 53!ixS5m lAm -< :s > > OiliH^ O m m o o ffi fli rv> I M X O Q MZ rvi rrt 9 <«4 O Q IX Z Z S r*o nl fTl in I f- f w ' ^ 5: 2 2 2fM ' V4 X O O M O ■ X/ ■ . .n . ■ . .v« • * 1 , • .. ► . “. -» * .s £X #-2 • .•* *.*5. • 4, .■■’V. , ■* A .5. "' v < mamywm^nr^- ' . ■-.'V ’■,•*»' •<'. : •* * • • ‘ : • --r • V*:- ' -. ^'1-' ' X •*^* 0#Kf .’ *■ - V* i .' , • 1 •. • • »• .r ^ ^-V^t'i v.-v y v2r t!^ A4 r *,' 1 . - j • .'.t# «'».* '•.’■■“ '■ *• *'• • «* '“J;/.* .' .*-'.,'x' - ^ ' Aa kCm Jf • ^ iA. W ^ ^ _* >1..^ - ^: ■*:. •-i'lsxv t'A-. fe< i?v?Tv^4li / »a X u«r £ ^ <—«» Si tt S'’Ss TT i* ••••., Pm b f«bPst :a • • • V S 9 X.y .<—X ✓./ cJb *5 5 -o 5**s •*»4 •lb — #b* X •••••*•i' mtm ^ V 20 !0 Jfi.JL JB. HANLON '•> . • • -* •*'■ X ' ■ ‘ * 1 ■ •• ' >. \v -V \ lob •Vd TT ol - rvj — “IT y z • "W zij\ ^ TT »—X . . 4:, 1 1 -1-- * • • • • « nUr .9^. . ' b d r» >» _ .117 S',(3r \✓.y \\ M a*•4 ^-x r j 09 Ol X u • Jt 5- 'W« _S & \ >< >•m •..«*« w •/S b,-' J* y iL:mm wm. k. yyryw»^'^ PI t :;•: i •* ..•^' I. --vniic sf*i wmK:,m:-. UkAifl imM m —» 1 \ / 0 a*1) :r 0 -n » • •♦*'■ ?^1 O')r:. c: * 1 il'^■• IV ir r .^ z: —• « « 1 ..' ri> 0; V . -i ^ ‘ !\ wv- r •t r“- c [ \ *“t A G r- :^- ! p /•. W m la fc:#"-J 'Mm iC: Cl r-f ^ r^* Q' »-•- ■■me- : 'm\^v--m v5^|fc.« ■: ?^;vT- em.:iil mm b IT ^ -3 '-T UJ CO -r O o <~D) ^ =; mm m'•'3 MM [^‘rf ik^.* ‘ & '^m)-yimymm wsm V’S’ f«ip '^^y;--'- "1 rt;,.; Vr-' -y K3 mM:::mmM s <aa> H3 Cl m f> , r^0^ S: <~T 0 0 *■ \ • a-u.-n —■CD a; u 0 <c • ■ 'i ■ \. meem m' jh-*^ iym M •i^ : •.•• .:, my - ymmm ili&ssysgsii m lT? : '• •■ tU vVv/ v>- 1^;.; / *? ' i"i ' y . f. ; I ■* . # A?-j. iV:'.-'^«r- 1$. iP'^ sSa^lPfc- ::.e-*^siiwi •■i.' * *. ■1^mrn^mm mM ■v‘V- & WF-P''\^:i :v!Z\^; ^1 ^li'iPiii sa ^^mmm • ■ : •• r; ; ■'••■ . ■ - '--‘it:-. fe ■ ,|j| I rnmm^ mmm mm fcil w r > Wfm. ..: ■' :ffc jS^I B myyfm y m V ii ■i •»-^ 'V--. '(■•«, ?r-Vr r/vi • By-» .Mj ■::.':. ••:-;®l • 4. ^/^2V C ‘-■^r--’ -.^•' C) »*—..r;sti;:,H. f.. y ■®Trrr»t5f iiV ■‘•t k ■/ V :\ II to urn a XX® 0 2 mo TlZ o O Xo zo o R2 O22 ^ Xo >x2 X >SS= 5§ 3 g S S « « ^S. T? CO O »*2-^s go ^ S ? oS S b saa fO 2O' o» bi H O •o 39 O Tm 30 rzm *v •1 t**] LiT* mm MS' i4M r^-,- *'r. r-' f.rV • i 1#’ . t •> ■; --'‘lx«^i • “*W mm '' •''.’t .^‘' -f ' V ' ' ■■; V pPH . .;: iS'V;.:' ’.' WJ: t-‘ r\t 'n ~u_,JBK' ■ '"■t m 1 'V ■(iKlVilfeJj Wtf* ‘•'V'-" • ’ '■-- -'‘*^’-^;'2f V. r '- f ’ 1^':im !> •' Kr- : ' .-'‘l rv, uT"/%-v . I- , / SU'**^*^ ^ It '' ^ ' t'" > ■ / J;.,,^. ■ •4.; i1 'r «■ W-i V •r . mm < •s o •''v Pv;. u V •■• ■,• • * sv“:^:;... r (/) P 8 1#V'.yk^ m " '>j r-' ■- ...W srl#;< ■. 'i?; • %..w:-v ^^.7- '.‘i ■ i-*.^--W-w ^ ?’i '■ .* ■ 'Vi J|i’ :' . ‘ *•'*. ^ > <f’. .vj - ■ . "■-■ -t '. ■ V •' i»T'j <fA\ ‘ -'hr ^ ' ■ . - ■ •^ , ,T ■ • T.1 V i< - Ki 1*1 ITi : : M- :*fi v."''t -V : -.-‘.ft'?5 ■■ ?: ■^;:V;. i ■ iiiii i.:.mmrnsi? * ■V'.t'1 i 4 • S • ^ - vf Jll^, % .y E I'4" z \. '-'M- o 33 O X > 33 Q 30 <S a m o ^O •n 33 33 O O Z S O O O 33 33oo Z zo >za 33o 1 I.;i'S*4» Ps ‘" >2^' E:.;^5 Vi. -............. b m ;: :-m:< •• V V •' -'>••■- y ■ '• ; il ■ a -1 , —-1 r . . ' . ?.v. f «vi*liLlJET"7 Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator June 8, 1992 #1744 Donald Helgager, 3265 Sixth Avenue North - Variance - Public Hearing l^v Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.56, Subd. 7 - Lake Classen is classified as a natural environment lake. Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (C-1) - Structural setback from natural environment lakes in unsewered areas Required = 150' Proposed = 75' Variance =75' or 50% sli List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Applicant's Addendum C - Plat Map D - Property Owners List E - Site Plan P - Cross Section G - Septic Inventory Map jiaik k'SA '1 ft‘■Si- ■! yj. $•'..f Description of Reqnest ;Applicant proposes the installation of a woven wire 4' high fence supported by steel and wood posts. The fence will be installed along the east lot line starting at street side of detached garage along the lower tier or bank along lakeshore or south yard and then west connecting to existing 6' plus privacy fence (review Exhibit E). lakeside or south and then run along the west side of the house attaching to the existing black painted wood privacy fence. Staff has inspected this site. The On-Site Septic Manager confirms no conflict with the existing tiered septic system. Because of the topography and location of dense woods and plantings, the fence will not be seen by adjacent lind owners or other riparian lot owners to Classen Lake. Bardshlp Statement Please review Exhibit B, applicant's statement of hardship and unusual property conditions. Reviewed as follows; Unusual shape of property; most of usuable yard space is to rear of house now located within the 150' setback from natural environment lake, Lake Classen. ■ m !■*! mmssja f 21^ Zoning File #1744 June 8, 1992 Page 2 *■ •Property is located on a busy County road. 3. m: Front yard is small and unattractive with noises of public road. Rear yard is the only suitable place for young growing family to enjoy the outdoors. m steep topography to rear makes it very unsafe for the play of young children. Desire to keep children away from lake. 1^' ■ -i ', . , v 'I-' ,T., y 'll " -- • k- y e: ' mm m ffiW lisiiP V- m^i mm ^ 'A mmm H-i mm- m-^ #e!fe^|ye- ..,V-^i*>' ■> TV' y m •*'«- .» wwa.-^ j ^ . 'V k-..^ *w MviV tn; \«mmsaiss; '3 :a.;v^ - - F la :yA£xl:eAa^UBiff fe- m ■ V .,;fv.'v S-'-^ :fe:^ye--iv^¥;y; X ; ■•, VfflAne-iY ------- - ...-.,< #«^ '.at*.—.... J.»A »n-~A«iin~iiii^i 7 /y- --r— CIT^ OP ORONO — VJ^RXMJCE APPLICATION i*?j7 f: I '■••"*• w"77 J' i f v^; -'a? ^ _ «k • »., ^ _ _ _ ;• f * ** * .V ^ % •• Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original Variance for non conforming use • j^ter-the-Pact Fees (Double application / Lx_1 / f OF 0,&3 Fm^CE OFFICE 1350200000 , 01 QEH 17^ ^rurrvW< IkbA 11 property information RECEIPT-THAt^K YOU if242r00 cool ROl TO 05/2. Site —it Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.)- -OOO'^ i-rcpeiti j. _ _ _ _ =.rsr>i >1 (-3^-1011 if not 1 AtSS legal description to application if not,14 - -- - - - - -«. included on required survey. Date Pr^erty Acquired----a /BOi-------(month/year)j Zoning District_ _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I applicant Phone (home) <4-7S~ ~(Ot^'Z-— .:■•< •;- Name r AJ iJbc/cag,Phone (work) Address: 3o6^*T____ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name 5v4>70g,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ __ ritv: pgh/Jo Phone (home) Zip: ST35'C Phone (work) Address City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $.. <-^£. Describe request in detail: y/r;n^ ^ Pn ^ 7?y^ /??; ' f^ACic- Pk&.y\ LAt^^—_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _■—_ _ _ _ _ _ VARIANCES REQUIREIT' infills Lot Area Lot Width Lot Coverage k: ■Tl Setback s Front Side Hardcover _ y Rear _ _ Average Lakeshore Other (specify) i^MIP^BS^raON Or^SOaL PROPERTY CONDITIOHS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and i conditions preventing con»pliance with Zoning Code requxrement .--------- .j ^ _____________________________________ ' —■ ' ■'■ "' —- '•■ v"' 0 (attach additional sheets if necessary) ^Pfonnatiop nmat be^submitted by the applicati^qn deadline date in order for your application to^ conside^ 2!’^Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271), 3, Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). . , Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) hardcover calculations as required (provide one reproduction). (1) copy 8%''xll" for ^ Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes ^ ___ _ _- nne CODV 8Jl"xll"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list or any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour variance application is not complete if the above information has not been inc? uded. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE . “ The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (start tim» not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses Incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Icnowledge. Applicant's Signature Date ONNEPS SIGNATURE j « 4-k The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of this request. Owner ' s Signature Date h J. Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held °h _ _jfc'ianning - -- - - -^ - - - - - - third Monday of each month.* Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant.r,%.‘%r’r:Snr Office of this change prior to the meeting. 4 i A 1 ^ ^ ft t -trt-m ftl ft m^a . , A . > V ■ ■ t .. ^ —■* -IJ 3 « HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Beca'.se of the unusual shape of the property (Attachment i) most of the usable yard space is to the rear of the house is ..ithin the 150’ setbacl; from Lake Classen. I'Jith Cc. Rd. t> within 100’ ■*'rcm the house, utilization of the yard between the house a.nd she lake is more desirable. Both from a safety standpoint and noise. U-ith the sharp topography near tie lake it would be unwise for us to allow our three year old to venture down there (Attachment 2). ..rr- We do not wish to put a fence close to the lake. The proposed fence WOUId be between 75’ ■> 100* from the nigh water line (Attachment 1). The fence will follcw the property line or. tne east side - continue down the hill to appreo-imatoly the cerne r post then proceec west t following the edge of t!'.e old lake shiore a.'.d end at tne s:<;isting ■ black fence (Attacliment 1). The fence will be constructed with woven wire suported oy steel and wood posts. ■m 1 r."' ii'.i-. ‘ i, a We have no neighbors to the west of us, south is t‘>e north is the road, and east is a vacant house. (It .has boe.T i apossessec by the lending institution.) .■ Wiien standing where the fei'ce ii to be. you cannot see the one house to the east of because of ail of tne trees.T- We do not intend to do anything to the rest of the property from the fence to the lake. It is home to Woodchucks, Raccoons, Geese, Ducks, Beavers, and assorted birds. mm jfBf. ' -rd 1^3 :riji : f . mmm ‘ i.'* • «:3 IP r JT ♦ 1 #. V .. %" « !*' ;; v ’:^Vrv .V mud -’..^.-A-^ ■ :r ■■■ ■rv-’ 4#' ':^i-, ‘: ■ ,.^.- v\;v ’-cVv-: • . •':%'vv -^ . ' ’ ‘ ^ . ., ***f - •»* ‘ ■ ti*- • I*. ^ ** . ^ ^ I . t'-.-- .••. ■•-■.••i. i.v* ../• •. ' .'/■• ' ■ ■■ » r- tii: - v-A--/ •- . . L * . ■• •• • . .. .• ... • . -• Cr ^ C« C, o U4isiis* corns'" i ■ . 'V w •• '■• ■• • -' . ■ V-"^ ■ 1 ■■ - ’■ I* /■ • ■ • - * ■ • *• .• • * ..-■V- V. •■:' • .V. ' \' :. ■' .•• •;■■■. •• .■■'• . -'■•- I-' ^ " .^v:* ■ • vO I M2 * ^ ^ Him 9 V w mm ^ ^ ,;#n ^ — 5 ^ V %. • ' V J,. f . s ininuAn OH ^ ^ ■ • ■*' • t oo ’ . V.. ';■ rj * ‘ •' *'v. *v. >: ooo M S»::s8 ®®lls2 5 o nj M A _ X I • ^*<rv. sc£2C! . ;;,u S5liss .;> S ^*1,. • ri g m -I ••• . •*. •■m ■ % •, ' . n |S8”ssSS"S o»35® <'» o”S f 2 * 25 ^ ft o « r 2 » ^ w M Z 2 5 *^ s « i5 C ^ ^ 5 J5 *S^_ 5-S2SSTlm fz§ wm lIMa • mS 3 » 1 • •- '-<s - ; . > • >^ ) ' ■ • • •» . -» , • ^• *3• .. ,• % •^ • 0 .'■... ^ . a V . H 'i-'. •• •' 4 >• ■•:* -V •..:. .v/'' ^<A-.-^-''':'r-9 mmmTm -• ',■'•• '' V ••.. iiik. -Wi-r..^;;: ^‘4 V;^■;^^; ,;4^\'*•='■-’ - 'J' ^ie*^-*7 ‘^ ' * ’■,•••• **-.:7*V-'fiiAi *x‘'. ■■ aB|B4i:- -v:. :s','IHL_ -i J 7 // #■ f-;- t" , -\-- . » . I ’ ‘ '-■ .V,’ >1 .:•' V-! c* . ./' u^i^r rCJ 1 sz^Jb.! v^’j-.'iWi', WilRisaSv;- " ■•; r: v. ■ >*■•'• ' ■ • • ■ 'S f - : .- -- - ' --;; - ;. , •■• •;-:y:-;' ■ >- *'• #: '■ . • - ‘•'. : ^ ; *:•,* • WMM ■ ... ■ 4 -W'-'^-‘- '•^■V'- :’7' ’^■•' '■• • ^ ..A, '• -, . ;v;..;f\/v' : ''.:^ v, ■ -♦■ -vj:'■• •V'vV/.•>:. '’4' .4 m *■ ^Jt2si£S^ i«;:: ^#? ■••:■ ■'.••.‘..•ai.i-.n 'tti •'-' i.^MM .1 'J^i'- ‘ S ■■ 1 .r,v • ^ V':' ■ .’ '■'44^4'?; ,^.: >*i - . i:;K:<^- ■^m-. t.- t'tevSsSfc r'yj^:ir Ei L^'^ea-K;■ 'S'* •'" ■“' ^•'"Vi 4VS & '■^2-' i..’.' ■ 4r ^ I o (S 9c CT' 1> tO V. P'S E's'"4S4: ^4::'4 . .^^■•■ >■4-IIm s, •:♦ v-:i >.4 ‘^4^4- 7: ^v, lli '.. : .•s.l’’ . i liAaiIWIP f >; ■ . ‘ '■) ■ V ’S S:CS >?^^^y-n'^''S;;v-',:^:mmmirn'i ■- 4^:S-''- /'s;.’." 4-Vi; ;m: ** 4 ' Wf ■'■ ^ 'JliiC-- ispi tSv-hiv ^vtV ;.s . * , mi ' .rr. r;^"j i • ‘'>!i '■*'«fc„ Jf^,n>* mmm-'-^ Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Adiainistrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administiator June 10, 1992 #1745 David Carlson, 620 Big Island Variances - Public Hearing m^' Pertinent Ordinances 1. i^y-. Section 10,22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Lakeshore setback variance approvals required as entire seasonal dwelling is located within the 0-75' setback area and applicant proposes major structural modifications and intensifications of structure. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover variance required within the 0-75' setback area. mm: 0-75' setback area « 38,430 s.f. Allowed = 0 s.f. Existing * 1,240.92 s.f. or 3.22% Proposed * 1,491.52 s.f. or 3.88% Additional hardcover * 250.6 s.f. or 0.66% ■» • > ' Am.:-- Review of hardcover within the 75-250* setback area: ♦ , '•V Klk-*'Hsi.: r -.S’! --- - #1; I "• 75-250' setback area » 4,797 .s.f. Allowed ” 1,199.25 s.f. or 25% Existing » 243.4 s.f. or 5.07% Proposed = 777.52 s.f. or 16.2% Section 10.55, Subdivision 26 (B) - Non-conforming uses. - m.' Vr_ . . -v.^ structural alteration or additions. Improvement of a non- conforming structure cannot exceed 50% of the value of the structure at the time of its being classified as non­ conforming. Applicant proposes major repairs that well exceed original value of structure. Section 10.31, Seasonal Recreational Code. Section 10.31, Subdivision 11 (A) - Based on proposed improvements of the structure, the code will require permanent frost depth, solid masonry or treated wood foundation that completely encloses the entire perimeter of building. m Section 10.31, Subdivision 11 (D) - New roof must meet standards of RS code and be at a minimum 3:12 pitch. V » i . '.A't ■> ‘’WiM' VV^' .-J •Zoning File #1745 June 10, 1992 Page 2 ^^Km- ■■m Section 10.31, Subdivision 11 (E) - Minimum plumbing requirements of RS code not valid as structure (seasonal dwelling) is less than 800 s.£. in area. Applicant is required to address existing plumbing needs, sink in kitchen area. Section 10.31, Subdivision 11 (F) - Smoke detectors and fire extinguishers required. Section 10.31, Subdivision 18 (F) - Non-conforming substandard buildings or structures. There shall be no setback exceptions permitted for any horizontal building addition or hardcover increase of any kind within 75' of the shoreline or within 26' of any wetland. Applicant's proposed improvements do not fall within the exception set forth in Subdivision 18 and requires variance approvals even for improvements within existing building envelope. Please review Exhibit E, Gaffron's memo that reviews pertinent ordinances that govern requirements of septic capabilities for property based on existing and proposed improvements• Section 10.56, Subdivision 7 (C) - Part of Shoreland Ordinance: Section 12.30, Subdivision 7 - On-site sewage treatment code; Section 10.31, Subdivision 12 - Recreational seasonal district and MPCA 7080 code specifically Chapter 7080.0210, Subpart 6 (F). Mat of Exhibits / or i rmm y' A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Neighboring Property Owners Acknowledgement Form E - Gaffron Memo 6/5/92 F - Hardcover Fact Sheet 0-75', Existing & Proposed G - Hardcover Fact Sheet 75-250', Existing & Proposed H - Detail - Existing Seasonal Dwelling I - Detail - Proposed Seasonal Dwelling J - Survey - Floor Plan - Elevation - Septic Report 10/31/90 - Photo of Seasonal Dwelling - Resolution No. 1998 Approving the Lot Area Variance for Record Lot 28 . i&i. J . V' - ■ i- ^ t. . i ' ' i V-^ it L5 * - -vv - ■: ■rmy^ •ij' ipsilinm- .V Zoning File #1745 June 10, 1992 Page 3 Description of Request la: The applicant proposes major alterations of existing cabin I consisting of an attic expansion for storage purposes, new siding and windows and alterations/remodeling of interior layout. Review Exhibit H and I, the existing deck on the south side will remain as shown at 8' x 22*. Applicant will reinstall a new overhang over the existing grade level patio measuring approximately 7' x 17' to the west side. Note overhang is now part of the gabled roof design and has been relocated slightly to the south so that it no longer blocks view windows along west side of structure. Review Exhibit I, the new additions to the cottage consist of grade level deck and proposed screened porch. 250.6 s.f. of the grade level deck is located within the 0-75' setback area and 630.52 s.f. of the improvement is located within the 75-250' setback area. 'a V - J. f-K-- Variances are required for all improvements to structure located within 0-75' setback area and for portion of grade level deck also located within 0-75' setback area. Per Gaffron's memo variances will also be required for treatment of grey—water from existing single sink in kitchen area of dwelling. There is no way that an on-site septic system can be developed within the limited area within the 75-250' setback area. The only option available to applicant if sink is to remain is to approve a variance for the use of a holding tank. Review Exhibit E, note the specific conditions set forth for any use of a holding tank on a Big Island property. As Gaffron's memo also notes, there has not been a request for a holding tank on Big Island since the 1978 septic codes were adopted. It is the practice of the City whenever a property owner seeks approval for the use of a holding tank that Council approval is required. There are several physical limitations that will create problems for the installation of a holding tank on this property and if approved will require special design features. The RS district requires foundations, at permanent frost depth, solid masonry or treated wood foundation that completely encloses the entire perimeter of the building. Staff has no knowledge as to the type of foundation that exists today. Review Exhibit N. The Assessor's record notes cabin was constructed in 1963 with footings only. There is no record of any additional improvements to the foundation since 1963. Applicant has been asked to arrange for an inspection by the Building Inspector, hopefully, prior to our meeting of Monday evening, so that they can report on the status of the current foundation and what applicant will be expected to provide. If structure is to be raised and a new foundation installed, applicant may be asked to move structure within the limited building envelope within the 75-250' setback area. (Review Exhibit J.) AS Mpmm *• C- • I mm Zoning File #1745 June 10, 1992 Page 4 Issues for Consideration Applicant proposes the removal of approximately 20 s.f. of patio block in exchange for some 250 s.f. of additional hardcover within the 0-75’ setback area. a. • ■ * Can the new deck structure be modified so to minimize additional hardcover in lakeshore protected area? b. mm Are there other existing improvements within the 0-75' setback area that can be removed? ; .Is the existing porch area to the west side of the house a concrete patio or deck as current plans propose? Is applicant proposing construction of a deck where existing patio is now shown? Review Exhibit K. Note storage loft area now proposed within the proposed attic area. ' 'HH a.Is it to remain exclusively for storage? b.How does the expanded roof design impact new foundation needs? c. te:"-#: Refer to Exhibits L and N, new overhang is now tied into gable rocf design. This is a more intense, permanent structural improvement than current flat overhead structure. d.Pending receipt of a report on the status of the existing foundation, the RS district requires major upgrading of foundation, would applicant be best advised to move structure out of the lakeshore protected area and into the 75-250' building envelope? Statement of Hardships Please refer to Exhibit A. Staff would add the following; 1.Property is a peninsula and limited by 0-75' lakeshore setback area. 2.The majority of the one acre lot is located within the 0-75' setback area at 38,430 s.f. 3. Structure was installed prior to lakeshore standards in 1963. 4. Entire structure is located within the 0-75' lakeshore protected zone. V. -.4 fe;v , I ■! j >■t --iOBSA Zoning File #1745 Ju^e !o; 1992 m t iia Page 5 Options of Acti< Denial, mm V -" OR -t.- iilllilHlill v"7! .. . •• • '^:r§§'if' Approval es proposed cn Approval subject to the following conditions: A. m “WK ■'■“‘fem-. ■ ***■ h^n Applicant must hold hardcover at present 3.22% within the 0-75’ setback area. This can be realized by either reducing proposed new structure and removal of existing hardcover improvements within lakeshore protected area Recommendation to approve holding tank subject to the conditions set forth in Gaffron's memo or removal of existing sink within kitchen area. i:- 1 :’sSRi^ K< ■ ■ Per Section 10.31, Subdivision 12, applicant will be allowed an alternate waste treatment system as current outhouse does not meet code standards of both Orono and MPCA. Others.:c' Planning C^nission Rec lendation ’ ,• • r.Based on the report of the Building Inspectors, applicant may wish to table the' application to determine the feasibility of relocating structure within 75-250 ’ setback area. nvmm Hiim i® m Wy' m wmmm. y V ■ ia iwW' -JeJc.i- mfe>mm PwwW . ■ fe: -5^ ■ wm ■mi . ^4 ■M*.. ..c-ys-J V , ■ '. *■; ■ / t'’-- -k , -J, mW . I m- •I'* " ’ . Iv'. iifsii •v;. •.:; * V — .nfc .- ,-*.» 'Alt^ :1TI OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATIO #1X 'H^gSS^ 4 /Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 ter-the-Fact Fees (Doiible application fee) 4. - j m ■i 1 rrrv nr WA ) I Ul property information Site Address (o20 fe^Tslarw?i UKUtAJ F inance office 1350200000 01 QEH 225.00 CHECK TL 225.00 heceiht -thakk you M242780 cool ROl JOSH . 05/26/': -.Ik,— Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) 4" ;k. .i; trv * Attach legal description to application if not included on required surv^. Date Property Acquired 199/ (month/year) I HW(do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: _ _residential _ _other (specify) ' Zoning District: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ APPLICANT Name /^AVJD C/^RLS0N_ Phone (home ) _ Phcne (wor)c ) ^3 SiS A)A)fFlOUie.R CLtV. .VKM»,L*IMifA OWYESL (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name SA/n€.Phone (work) Address:________________________City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: VARIANCES REQUIRED ... Lot Area Setback: _ Lot Width X Hardcover _ _^Lot Coverage Front Side _ _ Rear _ _ Average Lakeshore ' ''.(Sv-'. ,r-,other (specify)y ■ j; HARDSHIP/DBSCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements- - - - /-Q pi ^ .feg£------------------ — * * I f —1 ii" _____________ a S44y7<» ^ (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for yonr application to be considered complete; Completed Application Form - - - - t " /j 1. < < 2. _Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. _Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%”xll'* for reproduction). 5. _ _^Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8*j"xll"). 6. _Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8*5"xll''). 7. _^As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8'.___^Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that, yonr variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and corr4p^V>o best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date ONNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of this requ< Owner's Signature 5/9 mE *Date S/Z2.hx. Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Plannirg Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month.' Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Ccannission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. '•«r U. - •:1 S :W T- 7X«l|p. IP 4 ..I I "s - «>, . t‘—.. •* ' ?.: jfe : :;■ ■f';".r’--v..-. j - . «?... r •■ »i • ! V- 9s e oovn ^ .■•. * • ju”-. - PriTr -. *«•.’ V;'- \^-;^-■ ■ ? _ • ♦n • • - •- « t «v V •• • !'■; ;■ •' . • A ’- tt i‘.V 252|^§S2 M 2 o ui m ^ S M a|n,}S 7 ^gjR^sr 5^^r«K. s 10 M n r> p v< r- M X X o o < fV> > > ^ H* X X Min r- f- o fv» rrr m m ^ </) </> i -1 f- r* X M I IM •t “v \ •? .‘ f ■. # 7 > ;> ,St .. • ^ . M O O O Mg g o oM Z Z vn tn /v> ^ X X O fv» j r- m m iij X M (/) (n e v/i M M X X O Q» > m 9 M 2 ^ < M ^ z X X o I r" m m rv> • ]> X X M jn Z $ W 9 9 m S o -4 o ► M §§ 4. 9 m m 9 M ■ > X X M ^ in f- 9 9 Q I vn r- Q Q fs» ^ rn z z M v^ o 9\M > m r- v/4 > 3 o r- o o • IM M m m rj X X o o •< -< o M M - ? 8 » » w ■*sSSs? X z -4 H Z > > M ?gSfSS<>-« r* 9 ^X vn r- X 9Q M -< o IM C ^ ^ ^H M X Q IX 2 * ^ M 2 m •• M ^ **3 o»c IM IM i * •- V. V H >009 n f- IM Xvn m S o 9 9. • o ^ X 9 9 o VM .9 . o •_ H IM Iff m M VM r* IM > > o o - • »* -v^; . f S ^ 9 5 V •- »• IM O M Oo $ ^ • » ‘ ■ * <-. * 1 . •^•'•4 . ft!.' ■ .' »*•> > • ' '.v'V m. f a'-:-. V •; >.’ ■.*•1 r;;>s .N X IM 9 X O M H IM > > O 9 »/ •**v.;: Xt ^ Vyiy'i'i:' / X M n n p 9 r* IM X X o___________9 IM > > 9 M X X M in f* r- o IMfti nt ^ >99 fvn ^ M H r- r- 9 M 2 X M ^ Z X X o I > m m . IM < Q 9 M 9 M p n p 9 IM X X o 9p- IM > > 9 9 M X X Mvn r* r- o fM 2 I IMZ > 9 w> • f- f- 9 M __ m M -M Vn X X o I X sO c. o o v^ w m Q p 9w m Q o vn X c 9 X o V/l vn > m O IM y < Q -< *r? w z X r* o IM > m > fM X •< 9 I9 • M o > m 9 M 2 X M -M Z X X o I , r* m m im > X X M Vf« n IM 2 2 O V/4 z > M M o 9 M O O O *M n 9 2 X M > _ > > o IM 8SP? r 9 MM H C. t- 9 M M %| ’S2*§S r- M M M 9 m X 9p f*ut ^ 5 M ss 2 ^ X o o » «B 9 9 o 9 XIEM Xs*^ 55 o 9 X «4 0S ;;,.,;|i ”§ - 2 r . ♦*-*'. ‘I . ^ *»^ :- ' V ■^.■!K.>S. •■,. • vt';..V • -v.^*;v.'a/ •>->•i , .- • . . • . • . * . . K*'/ ’ ' '* * ‘ •» ^ r^.; V'^ •0^ \n r:\' -'■« • ^ ' . •• .. • J ^ ^ -H ^ . * • . .■••-. r.^ ■* '•# •r*': '.• ^r.'.sv .•. M ' •« .t - ; - -v*' • * 4 ’• f- f ■ * ' ■ . • • — /■•** , .. , .. .#•• _ , v.-‘‘'V ;-' ;* -i’.r • »*'’•■•• ‘. - iV' . . •/ .♦•#'• ' 4 *i-- *■ - / • 1 ^ •• • *• i -^ • <•'*. ■■.•■;■»'•-? • , , / . . ^ .. ■ r . ' •. ■ • r-> ** ■ • V r- i.'-v *;^. • - : T. •T“'V - • . : * * *■•*. ;.' * r—V.JL* .. ' ' ' . -.. •’ • *. ‘ * . •' '^ .T* ■*■■'.,•■• ■ ,^ ■ , f ' . 1 T' ■ ■ ‘ , ■, »♦.♦,■ 4 • ... t. ■ * m > » \ •< > > m Z o o z > a o 2 99 » . m m > 99 \ > > m z o a 91 > os C9 ?n X I" oo Ul I--'b- >•-'■; **• . ^ M o n p w .•.'■I:-';- ® f- r- o »r* M M M ^' I/) w Z Z £ •%.* H H O CMrs» 2 c- C. o ^ ?§||gS (/9 o m m 5 >» \ ' 4 » ■ ' « . ^ > A* •V' i?'• •■••,1?: : ' ^ • . r . ■ T'-,; ^ • • a JL' ' : ,-. j ’••. .< « • •■ .1-. »•■, 4.^ r: .»;•■. • . t • • -* * v^\ ir : r. . . ■ ■ ’b '*- ” • • • .’ft ,'i, .v*» - - '•■' ' 4;'-•.: OO X M ^ -n m _ n ■ ■■*' - ■ r f 4 igss_ m (/» HI • .A ■: ^ .V. *;.: /•: X Uf c. C O irt HI M > OPz M 2 o 52 m ^ l/) p o i XI c. c, o m ..V, i .>•.'• k *•• ’ • r*^"^ ^ -I: * • ■. *“ ■ L » v^ . . ; W •• 44*A . '* • >‘*-• •• Wt.' V / .. • /-r4 r-r - • ■ :* 'jk* ‘* fs.A a>F- ^ ^ .".-V **. ■f‘jr ^ * o c. . 4 • - . c; ‘ • • .• ... * • * *»i ■ Y%V> ..-• *•. '«'f A "i't ■ -i • * ■:. / * ’;A-■.' * V- r. -• *. » ‘ \ M r» I M X P M > O M HI -S> m -n o I2 -< O M rv» Z m m M w X X O Pa m f- w » 6 M ui zvn o oo ^ w Ul M c;°5S5* P (/)(/) O Mii.« r H«M 91 X O Min M H Ul IM C W C9 t Ul ^ O p ru ^ U4 2 S ^ v<c; ■*fc •. f ' • ^ .••f*,. -•■'•, - ^ • ? * •, -'J*- . . . . • ». V ■ • •■••..', ■ • • ,. <“ • -Ml • ' ».- , »v -.'■ .. ’■)■■•• ' ''■ x»‘ ,•■ ■ 4-. '. ♦ - •..* ;V* V-' ^ ^ 5 ... • : ^ • .■ \ ^ , V " > ^ ’• ** .* - *; I* . 'A ;, »■ ^ ' •''''••".v. A* -:•. /-N. ■•■viffr {•• • ?'. ■•;■‘'•."'.•4.. •*-•//->•..■;*■; Af* '*., *X '^- ■ «4*. • -V . - -.. .,/. ..»• .. .• .. ••,.■• • .^ .-. *. • . . . . ' ’v H .• ..V.. r ^4„ *' .* •• .' . • - 'A-.. A.r:^A „ • V ... .^-v>r:: ..^'V.A A -- - a. .v* J'3 : .'•'V .•,' ;V-. 4 t •■ .4r'- -. • • .. ^ |B'i; K '!>:ir: V 4M^' Iw7» V‘lfc^ <o i.:¥ ■':?« 4 i •4JV •tW *•» eC rexuon roiNT •. .lake '*|iihneto ()Ika • (VAC“.2W’My(ISC ^,»21' . •. - '* »Y V ...-’* • -m. . N> . '‘’ ; i" ; ' ;■ • ■ . X ijt'x ^ ii'.' v_'■ ■, J: ,;v • - - isr .. « ......................... ••• * '*•*•'*% , 1 t * »^9, |..v.. • 1 ^ • t **'V 1 \, . \ 1 •r-VV-- •. •(0) :. 'Y1'• ( 7(»o) !• .. •• *J "KITCNEL'S SUBOIVXSIOJ COVERMUENT LOTS 5 AND IN SECTION 22 TOHNSH: 117 NANCE 25- cm OF ONCNO /•-... V .srr—r* s.ii-.'i; 19» • V ■'■Un^.S'3 : . .^:»T• ■ : : ; J!C: ',• % ■'■t' iS- S£^iSr«. t-, ‘•.V MDiCTQMU UN€ FA« FKiT or NQRTI€^ f€SeM •' v: $ $U®VISlflN OF/WI, I f jkrx’^^ yi5C T91< K-j) OF lonc^s jBWWv I6-rtLAW cSr «f#CT0M(* .'.>k ^1 ^ fc. ih^'■■a ^—jr Jeanne Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator June 5, 1992 Subjects #1745 David Carlson, 620 Big Island - Septic Issues It is my understanding that applicant is requesting a variance and building permit for additions to his existing cabin on Big Island. The property is therefore subject to both Shoreland Regulations and On-Site Sewage Treatment Codes. Section 10.56, Subdivision 17 (C) is the section of the Shoreland Ordinance which deals with non-conforming sewage treatment systems. Any non-conforming sewage treatment system must be upgraded and made conforming, at a minimum, at any time a permit or variance of any type is required for any improvement » cn, or use of, the property. us;' The On-Site Sewage Treatment Code, Section 12.30, defines non-conforming system as "a prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year flood plain; any system which may or may not meet all the location, design or construction standards of the current City codes and which is failing for any reason; and any system with less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics". That section also defines sewage as "any water-carried domestic waste, exclusive of footing and roof drainage, from any dwelling or other structure. Domestic waste includes liquid waste produced by toilets, bathing, culinary operations, and the floor drains associated with these sources...". Subdivision 4 of that section requires that "all sewage generated within the City shall be disposed of by connection to the City sewer system or shall be treated ana disposed of in an on-site system according to the provisions of this section". Section 12.30, Subd. 7, defines speci:.l provisions for Lake Minnetonka Islands. Subsection D indicates that "a complete on­ site sewage treatment system including plumbing fixtures, is required for all structures containing a principal dwelling, for all properties containing two or more dwellings, and for all seasonal dwellings over 800 square feet in floor area. It further notes that a complete on-site system is required for all buildings containing a water-activated toilet regardless of the type or duration of use or occupancy. . 'V:/ i ‘ mmm ■ •• - ■: r». vV>' . . SiLiL' •V<-M'Vt t§ Zoning File #1745 620 Big Island-Septic Issues Page 2 Further, any dwelling, building or structure having running water plumbed inside to any sink, lavatory, tub, shower, or any other plumbing fixture, but not a toilet, shall have a conforming grey—water disposal system including a septic tank and drainfield connected to such fixture drains. ■l , r 1 ■ i Further, Subdivision 7 (D) (4) requires that any existing building required to be connected to an on-site system but which is not connected as of the effective date of this ordinance (February 10, 1992) within one year of notification that a non­ conformity exists, but in any case not later than 2 years after the effective date of this ordinance, shall have a new conforming on-site system installed. I^dsting Situation Staff is advised that there currently is a sink on the property which discharges to some unknown system. Whatever system this is, it is most assuredly non-conforming. Based on the code Lections noted above, in order for this sink and any other plumbing in the building to continue to exist or be expanded, a conforming septic system must be provided. Testing has indicated that there is no viable site in which to locate a conforming septic system on the property. The entire property is too near lake level and ground water levels to be considered for even a mound-type sewage treatment system, much less an outhouse which might have been an allowable alternative based on Section 12.30, Subdivision 7 (B) if conditions were adequate. There appear, then, to be two alternatives to consider: ■.■mi.Elimination of all plumbing from the structure, and use of an alternative waste treatment device such as an Incinerating toilet, composting toilet or small portable holding tank toilet which is carried to the mainland for disposal in a sanitary sewer system. Such devices are allowed per Section 12.30, Subdivision 7 (C). Granting of a variance to allow construction of a holding tank for grey-water and/or toilet wastes. The reasons that a holding tank situation requires a variance are as follows: Section 10.31, Subdivision 12 (B) (4) states "sealed vault-type outhouses shall not be permitted because pump-out and sanitary disposal is unfeasible." Staff considers holding tanks as similar if not identical to sealed vau).t-type outhouses in use characteristics. .0^ .K:’ : . r-j IS ?-:'; ,‘r •y Zoning File #1745 620 Big Island-Septic Issues Page 3 The standards for holding tanks contained in Chapter 7080.0210, Subpart 6 (F), indicate that holding tanks shall be located "in an area readily accessible to the pump truck under all weather conditions...". It has long been staff's contention that Big Island is non- accessible to a pump truck under normal conditions. t . "V Research into current and past codes, has not yielded a specific code section which says, "holding tanks are prohibited on Big Island". However, the issue of installation of a holding tank on the island in the past rarely, if ever, was brought forth, because the obvious infeasibility of pump truck access was a clear violation of the On-Site Sewage Treatment System Design Manual, Resolution No. 894, which was adopted by the City on February 15, 1978. Part V, Section 7 of that Design Manual in Item F indicated virtual identical wording to that contained in the current MPCA 7080 codes, i.e. "holding tanks shall be located in an area readily accessible to the pump truck under all weather conditions". Conclusion is-Based on the above information, a holding tank would not be allowed on Big Island unless the City grants specific approval. It has been City staff's policy under previous septic ordinances to request Council approval of all holding tank installations on the mainland, and to my knowledge there has not been a request for a holding tank on Big Island since the 1978 septic codes were adopted. One additional concern about the idea of placing a holding tank on the Carlson property is that the proximity to water table and groundwater would tend to cause serious flotation problems with a sealed septic tank every time it was pumped out. That tank would be sitting in water virtually all the time, given that normal lake elevation is 929.4 feet, and spot elevations on applicant's survey indicate a significant percentage of the property is less than 2' above the OHWL and most of the property is likely below flood plain level. Additionally, the use of a holding tank for grey-water and/or toilet wastes in a location where pump truck accessibility is severely limited, provides a great incentive for a property owner to find alternative methods to empty the holding tank; the City should not encourage a situation which would tempt a property owner to break the law. ..w • ’'C:v- - ‘ * -. Y, Zoning File #1745 620 Big Island-Septic Issues Page 4 If, in fact, the previously proposed septic easement situation could come to fruition, that would be the best of all ^ worlds in many respects for both Pegelow and Carlson. They would share in the cost of a system that is used on a minimal basis (I am presuming that Mr. Pegelow does not spend the full year at his cabin, although I note it is homesteaded property). If the Council was to grant approval for Mr. Carlson to have holding tank, the following conditions of approval should be considered: Holding tank must be protected from flotation. The cabin may never be granted a conditional use permit for greater than 180 day residence per year. A current pumping contract must be maintained and kept on file at the City. Yearly inspections should be required, property owner to provide transportation for City Inspector. Any single confirmed incident of holding tank overflow or unlawful discharge will result in the immediate revocation of further approval for use of that system, and the system would have to be eliminated and plumbing removed from the building. Outhouses and sewage treatment systems using soil disposal units (drainfields) should continue to be acceptable sewage treatment devices for the seasonal type use historically found on Big Island. These systems under such minimal usage require almost no maintenance. A holding tank on the other hand requires diligent monitoring and maintenance, at an usually high expense, and has a high potential for becoming a nuisance. Isv .1*: ■ ■ ■ -mm *. s' I. •t;/.-*. 'v ;■■■; Ife . . ll^ii tv ; ‘V -v3 • ^ '3 "a i -.V ■'r ■I ■ .0 «•• ':’?!(*»■ •^V'T’y'•**■!.•'■ 1 ^ ■VS I'-ri-':y: *y ~f ~y^ ~y> - y >r<*F £: HiSi - C-^nncJ I r-*t-^' :^4v. " • HARDCOV& CALCULATION WORKSHEET ;k ZONE: (circle one) (j“75^ 75-! Existing Hardcover in Zone il A. (^TjoUSs)? - 1 Zg <!p*~7>4~2 s• Ft LENGTH WIDTH |# v • • • Lr S.F. ^ y . .\ •. ■■ 7w-gmmr^ .--4 , - ’^5 P • - -. y .,... ■ ’'v ..kw¥ r * 'A'\ S.F. S.F. -■ • > ■iii^- *S.F. B. Garage S.F. 1La W- c. D riveway • _ S.F. S.F. OT:^ 'W F*. y- -.* ■ "*1 D.. Sidewalk J.S.F. 'i 'V y%>:i * 'ib i 1 - X 1*7-^1211'S.F. W&iM P.i-'%2£i!i5Sil^^ z) ■*■ z(j^r^= -<•-;'-A::'" e 2.3 3>. 2. S.F . ■ £ f • ' U I r5'!..^r=' - '.MV MlLx •2.4’•/44-S.F. p.Landscape AREAS underlain BY , . PLASTIC SHEETING S.F. S.F. • i.'- S.F. 6. Other 5 X U ^ X 4=l 2jO S.F. . CoHL. ?a Jp\d • - • ' •* • l.‘. H* Total 'Hardcover in Zone - t •» \ ^4q.9^_ S.F. r Total Property Area in Zone • • *.T 1.• <'i!p. *.•w» I • •♦ • **-r? ’ -f rn \ X loo'«' itSiifs ■'M HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE)(^-7^ 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000'. Existing Hardcover in Zone S3 •. S.Fi LENGTH WIDTH ••• ■ S.F. S.F. — X S.F. ■ '•V' • C.- *S.F.i . B. Garage S.F.4 ' -f.—.. . i i c. Driveway S.F. \ lA ■/ •It'’S • F« D.. Sidewalk .S.F. ;V..h \ i .Au ...> ^>MsVtoc( V^.F^CicoO€T2..•«• V 12^D.q2 S.F. f^crAovS Fio crio H>u?cXs S x4i___ Datta/ t^t—I ________ — zo £. ^: >XXP/(OE^ S.F. ; 1 s . ~4-* 'S.F. F. Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY , , PLASTIC SHEETING S.Ft S.F. :• •—>S.F. -T.S.F. ssPTic MecH G. Other « I Ai X 0 m m m S.F. •i#« «U-. I,'I Total " Hangover in Zone *• • '•' ••VA^h^s.F, A Total Property "Area in Zone *. . • ' S.F.B >■- ;Z • I 1 ' 4 (TLSHi^ jTlOO =■ .TST^-S » ■■ ■ ■ ■«* " —* • ________ _Pl=L»». - . . - >1- * _ ' ' ' * •rZ^:r 4.'Z.t?/ £ ■';•^g| • w • * V W'.' - :: >PiS *ff| -:••■ . ' * e - -. -• A. ‘ House •7 LENGTH WIDTH m . j-r. m|9r". m - X •HI >Lfc,-4 B. Garage M c. Driveway MMyt:mm « ^ • • ‘ D.. Sidewalk . ■• .a< E. Patio/ Deck ‘Ip X d- l” ' •i *>:■ i^- • ^ F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY , . PLASTIC SHEETING 13 m • •i'*r G. Other .* «* «■ f HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' (j^25^ 250-500' 500 Existing Hardcover in Zone 2T>JSr. -1000' • • • X •*- IV.-Total 'Hardcover in Zone • • m t. k • •• "> V ' ^ ---- .*•^1 I S.F. S.F S.F. S.F. V. <■ ' .*- S.F .k. S.F.^S2'H S.F. S.F S.F. S.F. S.F .\ S.F. S.F. S.F. *.«........ \rw S.F. S.F ■» ■ (AnS.F. S.F. A > ’ • • '-’ji.:! f.-n Total Property A rea in Zone - _An^m S.F.B *•-. « K-ikC • •• •^ -f m -4n-^i- - rioo ' kz ?3 t IP" ■aw HARDCOVER CALCULATION W0RKSHEE]___^^^^. s^ACK 20.E: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75^ (TS^ 250-500; 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone A. ■ House S.Fi LENGTH WIDTH S.F. V/ a; ^ ■ S.F, Jr mmm X __ S.F. . S.F. B. Garage S.F. c. Driveway S.F. S.F. D.. Sidewalk _S.F. .-f-. *P®rt-CVX S.F. E. Patio/ Deck ji. X *2 2^4>50,^2 S.F. S.F. •;;- ;fe kS^m Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY , . PLASTIC SHEETING - S.F, S.F. .W: ''»'V S.F. v: * j S.F. G. Other — •• V*' 'T.> • I ^X ^ • —t—-1 ~4-’T S.F. • .. • »*•.Total'Hardcover in Zcnf. U*4 n-pists.f. Fa • ■’ Total Property 'A rea in Zone '•Mv..• * • f j ^ai_S.F.B « 11 - 77’>.^iz ' i " X 100 —rrA-Z /% «^ajr»vOC.'^Ae^ittJ \ f inii:» ills: —ra^ ,.' ■•t '.»«i', jik ip4 ‘" J ;>:v";:'■ f-;-“< i: .:4'-Si& <r.4r: Vir-L’v-V '• rj^ , /Vr Corner o/* do/ /7 «^1 ■* ,j r':^% V < fit.,.- f'. i . l[i^- ' I if * * w. 0 tXi- V ■ ''v,-.':|i mm m. .r Jv >'«l' *f ^«• tfj /,*» ^ V/ ■ r ••■ -T^r ■ M V '-S' ■W^ »V / #s I detail i,* * sBiii&li»'-. /" = 4n* \i\ IT A k: 'V::..vW' -10 V ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT INSPECTION REPORT On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka CITY OF ORONO POST OFFICE BOX 66 1335 S. Brown Rd. Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 B wner lAr^prhyoA.ADDRESS Lri^ PERMIT NO.'S.DATES CONTRACTORS iitU aty Ordln«>c* No. 210 rwjulrw that each oiMita lawaga treatment tyttem in Orono be inepected on a regular baii*. The on-slta uwage trwtment lystem at the above addren has been inspected and appears to fall into the cateflory checked below. (This is an existing system □ new construction) -W LA/TTAS^ W % 7 JA r—I - or exceeds current City standards in ail respects relating to design, construction, and location. Appears to be operating *—I ' properly. n o Poes not meet ail current City standards for r»ew construction (1078 Code) but in most respec*s appears to be designed. I—I ^ located, and constructed gerterally In accordance with previous codes. System appears to be functioning properly; no major upgrading of the system is required et this time. rn -j Does not meet current City standards in many respects relating to design, construction, or location. Appears to be operating L_l adequately at this time, but has a relatively high potential for future problems. No major upgrading of system it required at this time. \r A System may or may not meet current City standards for design, construction or location, but is failing to properly treat and Uii ^ dispose of the current input, and is endangering a water supply, or is a source o» pollution to surface or groundwaters, or is creating a safety hazard, or is otherwise creating a public nuisance. Pleese contact the City inspector to discuss system repair/ replacement procedures. If drainfield replacement is necessary, soil testing will usually be required, and a design and site plan must be submitted for review. Your contractor must obtain a permit before vwrk is started. SYSTEM CONDITION ( P! Checked items may require your action) r Tank intpaction indicatat: □ Pumpout not naadad at tnis tima. □ Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should ba pump* ad out this year to help prevent future problems, □ Solids accumulation In tanks is at a critical level. Tanks should ba pumped out as soon as possible. □ System is discharging to surface. Tanks must ba pumped VYithin 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. □ Inspection risers mlulng-tanks could not be Inspected. Inspection risers (4" die. pipe) must ba installed in each tarik at next pumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out iR^lthln the lest three years, they should be pumped out now. Q Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle. (Does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation.) If tanks have not been pumped out within the last thiee years, they should ba pumped out now. Drainfield inspection indicates: D Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. D Some evidwnce of surfacing, not critical yet. □ Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. This condition may require replace­ ment or addition^ to drainfield. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repairs must ba completed within 90 days. □ Drainfield extent and condition unknown. SITE CHARACTERISTICS; Limiting Site Factors □ Slope □ Soil High water table ^Lot slae Sr Lake, wetland, or stream □ Drainage Potential for System Failure (depends on soil types, water table, and system condition) □ Low Q Medium d&High O System is causing visible surface disch^^rge. Site Capabilities for Future Expansion □ Adequate impair Q Poor □ Inadequate COMMENTS suriscv i . J7)^€rf' mjy))fn\/rr\ arJ Lr ypjJahfrss: (uJ>&r. Oat* of Icupaction /^Sapiic Systam Inapactur Not*: In tfi* tvtnt th« thi, in»p«:tion report it used to «titly th. requirertwott for • mortgag. or other transfw of tfiil nqorx does not guarant** or certify that an existing tyitem will continue to function properly, but it merely an opinion of the aOWltMCV ol the fystem under current conditions based on the available .ritormation. This ressort must be kept on the prenilses with system location and pumping records. WHITE COPY / Inspector's File • GOLD COPY / Homeowner * ^ -1. . Aviar t■ ■■■■ •'•r—-; !. . .•^ ■ ^ < ’ ^ ;a'> * •\ .^' i 's N '-5■ , .' ■< r ' • >->Jt'"'r ^ - V«: •TT'^ *“• ■ -'M ^ d . r X / • Of( *^'*5- . * . V ***» ’-TT ’ *■ * 4krJB& pyj'r'p?-:;-i • iyfc' ■ ^ r >M- w ;.7','^s-:':'. -\y:i ♦a r ' '• * ij.;>'' :k' ■* 7:i-7r,P^ l^ '. ■- ■?I-..- nPV: ' :WiP=k ^-4iM k ♦» ■:ddm II': S3if ■.,^: O*' .V f d.[ ; A. ' ■■ /• .:vk:.;:- P-;■ :k ’-'sil k ' '' ■ -VI- V ■ k V ■j'^^i’-'i,' -..o ■ ,k «^.v- 'U- ’ A% ^ ~ »—^ iitrilT iitf-- - -- .>>5 k «wl-.-l-i. , A. ♦. ^i. k 3IG ISLAND PHOTOS * v Date Jc'iVS by A.P. Olson - M.P. Gaffron P.I.D. Owner ;7^> 3/ - oo;i^ #2 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ #3 MAIN BLDG Bit. /y/3 Excel. Good Fair Poor Sleeping Only Kitchen Winterized No Foundation ^ Crawl C | /K Footings Only Bsmt Toilet Drainfield None Cesspoc >r Out House /4/. - Well No Water Lake Pum? From Neighbor Accessory Bldgs Excel. )»C Good _ _ Fair Poor ^ t f. City of OROIXO c./ li:Ka RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1998__________ APPROVIHG A LOT AREA V^IANCE FOR RECORD LOT NO PURSUANT TO ORDINMICE NO. 246, MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.31 % be IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Hennepin County, FINDINGS 1.* That John W. & Paulina Vanderhoof is (are) the owner(s)/tax-'XXiaU uonn W. et rcm-LJ-HC --------- - ---..X4-U4mpayer(s) of record of the following described property located within the RS Seasonal Recreational Zoning District of the City: ••Reserve** Lot, Pleasant View Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota That in adoption of Ordinance No. 246, the City Council reviewed ownership, development and use patterns on the islands and has deter­ mined that all the above described property combined is and shall hax-einafter and henceforth be one "RECORD LOT" as defined in Sectxon 10.31 of said ordinance. That all the above described property when combined as one RECORD LOT is still less than the minimum lot size required for new lots in the RS District, but that this RECORD LOT is being used and/or may be used in the future for any permitted use in the RS District without adverse affect upcn public health, safety, or welfare. » • • CONCLUSION The City Council of Orono hereby grants a lot area variance to above described RECORD LOT based on the above findings and subject to following conditions: 1.Jhis RECORD LOT including all the above described property combined ^shall henceforth be continued in common ownership by the same person or persons even if recorded as separate lots or tax parcels, and it shall not be subdivided, sold in parts, reduced in area separated without application for and approval of a subdivision by the City. This condition shall not preclude future sale or transfer or the complete "RECORD LOT" as a single unit. 2. treatment and other performance standards for development in tne District. .■ v' •• •V- Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Subjects Jeanne A. Mabusthr Building & Zoning Administrator June 9, 1992 2110 Sugarwood Drive - Request to Realign Entrance Drive y4< J >' List of Exhibits A ~ Applicant's Addendum B - Gustafson's Report Dated 6/5/92 C - Site Plan Approved with Building Permit D - Hardcover Proposed with Building Permit IpE - Hardcover Proposed with Driveway Realignment P - Realigned Driveway Proposal G - Topographic Mapping of Sugarwoods Plat Description of Request ■ ^ I I Applicant seeks to vary from standards adopted at the time of the conditional use permit approval for the planned residential development of Sugarwoods. Resolution #2652 required "each lot to be served by a single driveway or one curb cut at a 20' maximum allowed width. Driveway width is to be measured parallel to the loop road, Sugarwood Drive. The portion of the drive located within the front street setback shall be placed in a straight alignment from the loop road and shall not exceed a width of 20' within the front street setback area." '•i- At the time of the issuance of the building permit, the issue of a realigned drive was discussed and applicant was advised of the need to apply for special permission of the City for any change to the standards approved for the Sugarwoods plat. The applicant also noted .^^‘^that the house was planned for the fail parade of homes and that it was imperative for a building permit to be issued as soon as possible. The building staff was advised that the only way a building permit could be issued was for the applicant to provide a site plan that met the standards of the PRD. Staff accepted the site plan with the building permit (Exhibit C). Unfo-.ru-auely, during this review staff noted that the proposed paved drive exceeds the 20' alJowed width through the 50* street setback. If applicant does not receive approval of the realigned drive, it will be necessary for the applicant to realign the portion of the drive that exceeds the 20' required width. ■if & i Please review Exhibit A. - Mr. Bonner has reviewed many of the physical conditions unique to the property suggesting a need for special consideration. Staff has also enclosed the original topographic map done for the Sugarwoods plat. Exhibit G, note the severe drop in topography to the south of lot. ... mm ■:: ’ . 'I• '.v|j Y ; • T-h f h: fm m-m-:t- ■ ■ =•/ - '/= ■■ ■' * ' V -V •1: Zoning Pile - 2110 Sugarwood June 9, 1992 Page 2 m As with all Sugarwoods special requestsr the City does not charge for these special reviews and it is the obligation of the applicant to present the information to the Planning Commission. It is staff's understanding that William Bonner t;;il] present this request to the Planning Commission. If there is a lot that needs special attention, it is clearly Lot 6, Block 4. It is the desire of the developer of Sugarwoods to retain the original retaining wall and preserve the mature basswood tree. The temporary accesses created on the east and west side of the property lines were developed first to provide a corridor for the utilities and secondly, the most extreme west access provides desired siting distance for trucks entering and exiting the property. The most eastern access that provided the corridor for the utilities required the removal of three mature trees that are to be replaced with the final grading and landscaping. The most western access corridor required removal of underbrush. .4 3-1 Options of Action ■r*' ‘Wa';#. Approve applicant's proposal for a curved, realigned drive or ^ ^ V V'- Approve site plan submitted with building permit or li .r.;." Require drive to be altered to meet 20' width throughout entire depth of 50* street setback area. • t'-l 'f '■/t s/.. . . ■ ' ■ -■............................... P -jU \ ■V k' \ -,i ■' ' ,. , -w .» I ' - ■ t'i> r • . • ; ^ ■r 1 41 yy:^\^ a" y ■■ V ' • ■ ■ • ■ ’ T-' V; : I®«v- '■SS' :jv yH L.. i '■'/ ^ ^ I E2’ I Ps;' ,^;iS^^i|P ■ -iJafe - :' ■■■ ■ > v u-:.-^:^i^y: if/- fl--"’! fSR- Variance request m,i’^ ^i»-|;ii.:-. *.-* ; - • ^? -.- V . .•■ W C - - . iM •. -•■Vv-. 'H V '.^.-^*'v''': '' >' '■■■'''WHiff'-^ • m.-' ■■ '.■'■'^^^arf.-;,; We request your permission to reorient the driveway more westerly on^the lot in order to preserve sane existing snvaller natural vegetation, an existing 2-5' high boulder retaining wall and prinarily to retain a 5' diameter Marican Linden (Basswood), probably the largest tree in the area. The redesigned driveway would curve slightly ai'ount,: {.he basswood and enter the street at a more natural elevation rather than p.**; straight from the ^jif'fectly to the street. In light of the s - u d age of the Basswood, the more natural entry elevation at the street w»-., .rt =jny disruption to the existing boulder wall, we believe this request to n the best interests of aVl concerned and we ask your approval. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Respect ful1y submitted .m' , AjTv u pa william R. Bonner M' ’-r h: r-' ■ >";>f kt\ lira A *Av- V. :■■■-•■■= 7 ir-;.. . •. - '•<,* :=v^- ■ ■ mmi.m- •«' > |S9HW' yY^WmxM iiSi# m' 'i| ■iW'-; •- Wm,II m SJf • ■fr’'. ’ -.'tS. . .. . ‘im : i ' PI ’ m ; ,'VPv;^ i-"- ' -^V ■ ■ -.V It.. y\. ■■■':. . .v;- :^vp:^vv-;v. V , x pv#:#: v: .;• 4: m V‘ : "i! " -;: W' . WSKm^^^ .I®'"’ - ■'4':-V''• .:, mt: =:a3'V* . '• ■"■■■ ■ ^V'- ^ •■■■. : • Y{^>Y0 Y•- A V.‘ ,V4v^vi4v ii ■ :XJ&YYY’YffYY 1-^ •imi;," 'S®»' Ji'® V •.ii:,':V ■K1 li-- -'Ik, :®vi! mM ^ " ' 1 r ;.1 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik& ^1 Associates Engineers & Architects June 5, 1992 Otto G Bonestroa P£. Rdbe^ W Itosene. PE • joiepn C Andcftit PE Mjrvm L SorvM. PE Ricnjfd E Turner. PE Glenn R Cooic. PE Thomas E. Noyei PE Rooert G. SchunichL PE. Susan M Edenm. C P-A •Senior Consulunc HoMraid A. Sanioid P.E. Keen A Gordoa PE Rooert R PSe'^ertc. PE. Richafd W Foster. PE David O Loskoca. PE Robert C. Russek, AJ.A Jerry A. Boundorx PE Mark A Hanson. PE Michael T Rautmana PE. Tied K Firtd. PE Thomas R. Andcrsoa A.I.A Donald C. Buigaidt. PE Thomas E Angm PE. Gary F Ryiandcr. PE Ismael Martmez. PE. Mcnaei P Raa PE. Agnes M Rmg. AiCP Thomas W Pptersoa PE ^^chaei C Lynch. PE James R MaiandL PE. Jerry D Percnch. PE. Kenneth P Anderson. PE Mark R. Roth. <*E. Mark A Seipi PE. Gary W. Monen. PE Dan«l J Edgertoa PE Phe^j / Caswef. PE. Mark D. PE Maes B Jensen. PE L Phkip Gravel 0. PE Kaien L Wiemea PE r Ihdd Foster. PE Keith R. PE. Shawn O Gustafson. PE Ceciko CMMer. PE. Charles A Enckson Leo M Paweisky Harlan M. Cison James F. Engemaidt M'^1 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Cudd Construction Driveway Alignment Request Our File No. 139-1334 c.; ■ ’JLi ^ Dear Jeanne:‘4? We have reviewed the request by Cudd Construction to construct a curved driveway at 2110 Sugarwood Drive. The proposed driveway alignment is different than that allowed by the required standards set forth for Sugarwood’s PRD. The standards require a straight alignment which is at right angles to the street. The proposed alignment begins at right angles to the street, but then curves around an immense Basswood tree and angles to the residence currently under construction. > • •.’.♦a •r:. Due to the topography of the property, the vertical alignment of Sugarwood Drive and the existing boulder wall along the property frontage, the proposed driveway location is the most feasible. The proposed alignment and location will minimize disruption and should be easily constructed. We recommend that the requested driveway alignment be approved. However, there are several issues related to constructing the driveway that need to be resolved. There is an existing catchbasin at the proposed driveway location. The frame and casting on the catchbasin is the City standard R3067V with a B618 concrete curb transition into the surmountable curb, typical of the rest of Sugarwood Drive. The existing frame and casting and approximately 20 feet of concrete curb and gutter must be removed to facilitate the driveway construction. The frame and casting should be replaced with a Neenah Foundry Company R- 3290, with a Type V grate. The concrete curb should be replaced with the typical surmountable curb and gutter. Please contact me at this office it you have any questions. Yours very truly. .'•.Sii BOJ^TESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. :4l ■-••I mm 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 ♦ 612-636-4600 1 m - I mniMi.*- “* *~**^' ^ r-. • pi“': ^ It f^6;^isep .1^; T'*W HAHDCOVER OVLCULATIOK WORKSHBBT Proposed Hardcover ■“ Attachment A • •fi a • House length width X X X b. Garage X M34JS£ X c. Driveway mmi- jfeP (Include area within front setback area) d * Sidewalk ^tJ'O Ln!':'' '- : X X Patio/ Deck/PooIZ Pond Landscape areas underlain with pervious or impervious > heating/ x _________ fabric ^___ X S<re* g« Other X X X S.f . B.f . s.£. s.f. xtya B.f. 76.2. s.f. s.f. s.f. B.f. S.f. S.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. S a f . s.f. TOTAL HARDCOVER 9zia i.f* ll,.- } T*/ 3<^X»eLot Area iSjl w Building Pad Area s.f. - Building Setback Area s.f. s.f. Allowed Hardcover t. -i'm Building Pad Area s.f. x 801 ■ _ s.f. ■■> .. t alb- ait •’•t-v M- 5v i- \t ■'■T. . E..':I VO 'U»- K.V. «jye' #1743 Albart Banaar, lets »ox Straat - rralladnary Subdlalaion BtanouD pimuc mosinnoB mtnw 3. tiOO p.B Subdivialon and Conditional Oaa Porslt ^7“"!w th«M Itmmm will oommmncm prior to or botwora i^hodu ^hwingo, A^licaata proaoatiag ▼arlanco raqaaata tafora tha Coviaaioa ara aakad to aoaa to tha podion at tha fmt tho ebaabara wbaa tbair appUcatloa la aaooaacad^tha ChalJw^ Albla J. Ralaon, SOO Oxford Road - Conditional Oaa Parmit - Poblle Baarln? Staxan M. Barrls, ?J50 Batartown Road - Ranewal Conditional ^Ota Pamlt - Public Baarlnf 'j:L'--"2b?jrs:aJin^“^*"' - Ja»e« and Aay Lain?, SOO Orono Orchard Road - Variance - Public Baarlng Donald Baloaoar, 3205 Sixth Avanua north - Varlanca - Public r* Varlaneaa - Public Baarlas raxlaa dclvaway HJuniw! coiMisaiaa Charlaa Cudd Coavany, 2110 Suoarmod Orlva, raquaat to allonaant Vr: 10. Report by Plannlnp Coulaalon Reprateotatlva Maatins of June 0, 1»»2 (Stephan Pataraonl. 11. Statua Raport by Lake Oaa Coaaattac Rapraaaatatlvaa. Shntua Raport by Ftcllltlea Coaalttta Rapraaantatlvaa. 13. other iaauea. lOr'~^ r ... IH1 c~.«* £:m^, .-ft-.,. - •' -tf ■ ■ V' -•:> • ■■■ ■':;' •*■ l:-^ .. -- ■',j :;-;■ ■ 'S ■J: 'Sr ^i;S’ "iP s.-lk'* m:: k 4 -"'"Pi Ium h. 1 ’!4 1I Ipvi’i ?ll' ■.............—a -,:•'■--------0Pg6 "—g<*.<7s r»* «oU 4. — 4^ — o ^ ^ t f/i — O 0# >H M ^ C C; 4-* C > *o c •— I. CO o Z .^c :: . o u >% ^ C ^ O C (/) c "2 -o ^ CO VO O '-’ «o *J c - >>2 a rlrl SS|S \^uU * 5t» -^\:7 •'^■v"' 0 d I +J 4-» 0>a>t04^ ai</)o>o)c •O <0 • 01 <o c I. o 4-» to (4. Q> — o —• •O4-»t0 XI4-»E<0 m _j to q; o> 4-» u CM 0l*<«U93a> »>> -0 3 . O — 4-> — O’-'^ L.tOcO4.0»^ 0» »0 0» O •- 01 Of C (O u < IQ c Of o£ti.a;t.4JC0fCM u • 01 Of Of Of -O w £ U 4-f C Of CM L. : Of u • o i £1 ext X Of fC •o *o — c > 3— o ■o X) '"■'SI 0^0 fs. Of 4-» *j Of m •-C*« -to jCOJOf ^ ^ 4-» ••■*-> U ^ O Of "O M- C a. Of Of CO *• o Of — *-» 1-1*- -o 4-f jr x: to Of c • Of Of lOOiTCMtOOOfU CUJ4-ff^ ZM>C>* S • £ <o to O Of I- CO >M *o cn 4-> M* H-J= OfCO—« 'OtTt to*- • 4-> C CM 3 o • Cf> • I- QC fv. -O • C o c: o t*- —• M* o — «*ouoof>t faze — -M 4- c C<M4^ Of — C O 10*0 — OCtOOfOS OI^OO .^.MroC(.OOf-«-fOOf tfl — 4->O0f<a<3OU3CCX) u U Q.^ -t-» Q. CC to — S £ to JO to o J3 4-f > *0 3 • 4-»z toof—•tr)34-» tD«0 tOl.C'O^OC Of -O — o — 4J C3>£ • — -• >. ii u si C3>J C •!-> Of Of C C i- Of Q — Of c o c c 4-f C O O <0 a 3 Of c w Of 0)J= <Q Of Of — S0f<MtO u— I-— o CCOOfOZ OfO 4-» U OUI<MOf— Ofi. Of t/f —xr — "oofOf > *0 3 -M <0 +J C o • • —• uo>c — COioOffOCSforoOf — 3 Of to o O CL U 4. o 4- — i. 4- U o— 04J4--0 O Of Of —• CM 4-» U — JC +-* •«->00 Qf>|fO0f4-fC U 4- . to to — to — Of «a u)Oft»(- cnou Q, to (M — Of Of C7» C 4-» >4^ 4-> C c to o • — ttfO-M<0 — »0 —.CtOlO ^OfC OflOtOtOtO 4-) xa fo 4-» c ^ Of —. 4J J= <0 4-* >»4J — 4^ —. u to cn u — 4. to — O —i — o O to -4 — Of 4-> L. U >9 <9 Of U> c o Of Of £Z ^ >^ Of 4- «9 J= O E 4J U I. <9 «9 *9 EEC c c o o o x: L. 1. Of L. CO <9 Of Of Of u 4J Of Ot.OfU«9 OCOf 2 Of — O— Z 4-» JD u to — — ^ CM oro V£> O <T» >1 CM CO s CM C7» to is III dv d, .;•■ Tfr 5*ii 1 I P ■ : t&t' ' ■ \\ MS •:, :!rl P';-■' M‘,':l l^*'- ''■’ ,5 -. V. ‘a- ,„..“v■"rnmm i y’'■ ''.-v>!,>v^; _ V ■ ■« \ ■§^- 4 f d ..t ,.-r SO ht ^aent5 /. i. A" ''^/.#' /Vr.\ / '^^^ /■/^ ?' ii£- ■ i - ..j-------------- . . - 'A^. -^“-Tj'v '•^'“'./ <- fSl izM¥A%-\A. rj*/ fi^of s£^*f A >%»ffn»..9’ttf tS hf // /y /. .^, tv :S'si5>’4:;_, r !>1 \\^w.•dii '•'f _____-V) //? tnS'<^‘S^sVffr-i,’ £m^ hm ct af if4^ th*- ^:at* half of ■ »-i»h.asf v'»^rt»r «if ttw Houth**#ii« West 1*4 rhrr4»ofy m I, th , *<ntf il Ih ir ol ttu 5th piiiK-if«il Tow»« »h 11. Town^l.l, Mrri i ALK., Th«t fiar» r-f (h.vvi r>»H»nr i,..» 4, ;-. »ofh. Mnot il |»c«* of tu. 'rh ...................... il»«.ri^ *' .• rh.' »o’, r tirii^Hr ",'■, rn«» c. f ..id r.,v..rhl»m. U.r 4; -h.t..:.- g.-r ,l..m the Nor h liM of ..Id I.)t . dl.r.ne. Ill 4.4 f.-et: th,.„ee », u»h..r K, d. fl.rt.n, rr. I h. r.dhr «« dei,tee. . ,ti,,,nce of 45. » f.et; ,h,„... d.., !....,„, ,he l..t, M de,re., 0*. PI flute. . ,)n««i.,;.. ,1 1^1.j f,,., ihenue fcoutrmriy, deflctiM -o the ,,,ht •• d-dre.. <15 p.n.t.. . dl.f«ic- of ^1.4 fee., the, .. »ou.h»-..e, I , . deflftinq t„ the rinht ------------------- ■' -•■ ...................................- feet, t!e-n,-. •f* 4ft rfcoire*-* M »inut*f« ine Iff ♦ h«* fir. %* , *hent'f> ■n*y* f »M> i.n** *», • *>p. s«p.,in Iin.- • 4; M.t«t .riomi •.»icl jm>u h un. tu th. »e,t line of -tid 'AiuetfiPent l.ot 4i then., north MlorMV «4id n •«t lirw* »i,. *hi» iioint of uv^ianin^. < t , <, , t4»‘ ♦« ►hr- t Railway fM'W Rft'Hr* «• H*. f ly il f.<i «4f ’>! tidr*. v: SflKTl.* itaiii.f « I 4»i?^/3fRV imAWN iY oercMO^Bv nVNON DAn ncsciomoN .'p i4 *•' g_■t „ h .- .. , .... .- , 4 : •:4?r, .€9^ V n»4.’4V ^ * f .»*■ «»-- " «!-< — ---------- IM S (iiiifcm MRwwwii Lmvw lV% \ \ ( ilv- '\ I - t\l PRELIMI^iAHV f^LAj FOR At F OAiir ALBERT D. HANSER i -mj I0.|.=»l Zfc3 m SECTIONS 2 4 3-117-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA stiff t Ntt re:.-!: