Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09-21-1992 Planning Packet
Plar.r.ir.c Ccirnissicr.Council PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF CRONO MEETING DATEE ^1^1 / PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) ■Z7S y.’/i 1 ^‘/7^ r_ ri rAU //f 6. >^■\^f 1 4t> MvXjI. 1^-%^(1 7. fxX^ —j^//f\A. 8. 9. 0. 1. 2. 3. 4. • 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. • 0. i 4 > 4: PLANNIKG COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 1992, 7:00 P.N. 1275 EROHN ROAD SOOTH - COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - Mayor Barbara Peterson ATTENDANCE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS 1, 7:00 p.m. #1762 Paul W. Boyke, 793 North Ferndale Road Preliminary Subdivision 2. 7:30 p.m. #1764 Austin Evans, 255 Landmark Drive - Preliminary Subdivision ACTION ITEMS - Review of these items will commence prior to or between scheduled public hearings. Applicants presenting variance requests before the Commission are asked to move to the podium at the front of the chambers when their application is announced by the Chairman. 3. #1621 Terry and Jonell Johnson, 1045 Linden Lane Variances - Continuation of Public Hearing 4. #1755 Leonard Niska, 2304 Shadywood Road - After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit/Variances Public Hearing 5. #1761 Mark A. Hunsley, 3464 Eastlake Street - After-the-Fact Variance - Public Hearing 6. #1763 Woodhill Country Club, 200 Woodhill Road Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing 7. #1765 John E. Moore, 801 Tonkawa Road - Variances - Public Hearing PLANNING COMMISSION O ITS 8, Report by Planning Commission Representative to Council Meeting of September 14, 1992 (Chairman Charles Kelley), 9. Status Report by Lake Use Committee Representatives 10. Other Issues ADDITIONAL ITEMS 11. Planning Commission approval of minutes of August 17, 1992 meeting. 12. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the October 12, 1992 Council Meeting. ADJOURNMENT J To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorser City Administrator From: Date: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning 6 Zoning Administrator September 18, 1992 Subject: #1762 Paul W. Boyke, 793 North Ferndale Road Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing Soiling District: RR-IB, Single family rural residential, 2 acres. Application: Request to create an additional 2 acre residential lot from existing residence parcel. Note: As of this date applicant has not provided septic testing information. Staff has been advised that testing has not been commenced. Staff will request tabling of this application for review of septic Information once it is submitted. However, this is a public hearing and has generated significant neighbor interest. Planning Commission should treat this as a sketch plan review, hear from the public and advise applicant of any potential problems with the proposal. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Letter from Neighbors at 265 Hollander Road Letter from Neighbors at 275 Hollander Road Pacts and Dimensions * ■ Variance Reqd. I.Lot Area (Dry Contiguous) Lot 1(Existing House) 2.12 Ac. Lot 2 2.57 Ac. Reguired 2.0 Ac. (Wetland Below OHW)0.25 Ac.1.36 Ac.— (Total 2757 Ac.3.93 Ac.2.0 Ac. II.Lot Width - At Shoreline (OHW)165* *342* +200* - At 150* Setback 12* *350* +200* III.Setbacks Structures to OHW 350' +150* +150*Min. Septic to OHW 290' +(150*+)150*Min. L. Side Setback (S)135*210*30* R. Side Setback (N)45*30*30* Rear Setback (E)54*52*50* 75*Driveway/HC to OHW 390*85* Septic to Lot Lines 20*20*20' a. Zoning File #1762 September 18, 1992 Page 2 IV. Abuts Public or Private Road Lot 1 NO * Lot 2 Yes Required Yes Y.Hardcover 0-75* 75-250' 0% 0% 250-500'20% As Proposed 0% +20% As Proposed 40%+ 0% 25% 30% iry Applicant proposes to split off a 2 acre building site from his existing residence parcel containing 4.69 acres of dry buildable land above the 970.9 ordinary high water level of Lydiard Lake. Issues for Consideration 1.The surveyor has defined two potential drainfield sites, each 40'x90' in area meeting the required setbacks from the proposed lot lines and house, and the 150' lakeshore setback. It remains to be seen whether testing will confirm the adequacy of these sites. The system serving the existing residence was inspected on September 3rd and found to be in compliance. The alternate site for the existing residence has yet to be reviewed. 2.Lot width. Because both lots are proposed as lakeshore lots on Lydiard lake, the lot width is measured ^ the shoreline and at the 150' setback, measured as a straight line between points at which the side lot lines meet the ordinary high water elevation, and similarly at the 150* setback. Lot 1 does not meet the 200* width standard at either of these locations, and in fact even if the proposed division line was moved eastward to increase Lot I's shoreline width to 200', the 200’ requiri^ment at the 150' setback line could never be met. This begs the question as to whether a lot width variance will be granted for this lot configuration (which was obviously contrived to give the existing house lakeshore access as well as necessary dry buildable area). Note that east of the 10' corridor. Lot 1 contains approximately 1.5 acres. 3.As it currently appears on the plat map, Boyke does not own the 30'xl63.78' strip adjacent to his driveway, and until he does own this, the proposed subdivision would leave Lot 1 not abutting a public or private roadway. If he acquires this strip, then both Lots 1 and 2 will legally abut Outlet A (private road) or the adjacent parcel considered by Hennepin County as dedicated City right-of-way. If he does not acquire the strip, the 30' corridor of Lot 2 should be platted as an outlet. I - -r-ir-lgj Zoning File #1762 September 18, 1992 Page 3 4.Because both lots are proposed as lakeshore lots, there is no lot width requirement at the road and therefore the flag lot nature of the proposal would not technically require a lot width variance* In similar circumstances with a non-lakeshore lot, the City has consistently required that the narrow driveway corridor from a flag lot be platted as an outlot to avoid a lot width variance. 5.It should be noted that the City currently has a drainage easement (Conservation and Flowage Easement) extending landward to the survey line shown on the proposed subdivision. The surveyor is apparently proposing a new drainage easement merely over the wetland, which suggests a revision to the existing C & F Easement description. Staff would note that quite often for the surveyor's convenience, drainage easements are plotted by metes and bounds description which does not necessarily follow the edge of the wetland, and setbacks are measured from the wetland not from the easement. Similarly, the dry land between the edge of the wetland and the easement boundary is considered as dry buildable land. 6.Under the current configuration, the new residence technically requires an average lakeshore setback variance. Beriuse average setback as a matter of policy is defined by a line between the adjacent residence structures on either side of the subject property, the average setback for Lot 2 would be a line drawn between the house on Lot 1 and the residence to the south which is even further east than the existing house on Lot 1. Further, if Lot 1 was not a lakeshore lot and the northwesterly boundary of Lot 2 was at the northwest boundary of the property, the next adjacent lakeshore residence would be 445 Spring Hill Road and the average setback for Lot 2 would be barely lakeward of the proposed house. 7.Because there is no full cul —de—sac within 1,000' of the house, the driveway serving Lot 2 should be looped or adequate turnaround provided for emergency vehicles. Additional Pactors/Reqaireaents of Af^roval 1. r The Park Commission has requested a park dedication fee in lieu of land for this subdivision. 2.If the driveway becomes a shared outlot, its ownership must be shared. If not, appropriate easements must be granted. Staff RecoBSiendation Please advise applicant whether the noted lot width, average setback and 250-500' hardcover variances are acceptable. The application should be tabled until septic data is submitted and reviewed. 1 .A. L r i' Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk & Associates Om 0 PE Robert a Roicrvf. P£ • joieph C Andefi-k PB Marvffi L Scyvjrj p£ RicriATtS E Turner PE GJ^nn R Cook. PE Tromas £ No>ri P£ Rdo<^ G yhorxr l Pt Suun M C PA Engineers & Architects Mo^van A San^yii PE A Ccrjcn. P£ Rcc^ R Preffef>c. PE R<*Mnj w Fo«ef. PE DJv<3 O LCSkCM. PE RicOefT C Russcir A • A Je'ry A Bounccvi. PE M^rk A H^soo. PE Mtcrt3ei 7 Rautnijnn. PE Ted K Piekl. PE Thcrryi R Andprion, A I A Donj<j C BurgarUL PE Thomas E An^s. PE Ga7 P Ry^ar'Opf PE ii-raet Ma/t .-e/. P£ Vxhaci P Rau PE Agres M Rog. AiC P Thomas W Pptffson PE M<haei C Lytxh. PE Jjm-i R. Vj jnj PE Jerry D Ppnzscn. PE Kenneth P Anoenon PE Mark R Hdtfv PE Mark A Sep PE Gi7 W Monen. PE Dao<i J Eagenon. PE Ph$.ip J Catwen PE Mdft^ D VIJ i4v PE M *es 0 Jensen. PE L PhiTip G/avei n PE Kaien L W^'emen PE F Todd Fosier PE ketn R rapp PE Shawn O Gusufiors. PE Ceobo Oinnef. PE Charles A Enckson Leo M Paws^sk) Harlan M Otson James F EngeR*ardi September 17,1992 Mr. Mike Gaffron City of Crono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55J23 Re: #1762 Paul Bcykc Subdivision File No. 139-1762 Dear Mike; We have reviewed the proposed subdivision of Lot 1, Block 1, Lauranne Woods Addition on the Paul Boyke property, located to the east of Lydiard Lake. Subsequent to our site inspection, there are several engineering issues that should be noted. Lydiard Lake is a DNR protected water, identified as Basin No. 27-159P. The accepted ordinary high water elevation (OHWL) of the lake is 970.9. For setback purposes this elevation contour should be considered the shoreline of Lydiard Lake. The City’s municipal code requires certain setbacks to shorelines and these have been shown appropriately on the site plan. The code also requires a 200 foot shoreline for each lot to have lake access. If Lot 1 is planned to have lake access, the westerly lot line of Lot 2 should be realigned to provide 25 feet of additional shoreline to Lot 1. If Lot 1 is indeed planned to have lake access by means of the 10 foot wide strip of land along the north property line, a grading plan should be provided to show any planned improvements in that area. We understand that the bituminous access road from North Ferndale Road is a private drive which is planted as an outlot with joint resident ownership. To eliminate an undesirable "flag" lot with driveway easements, we recommend that the 30* by 407’ "flag pole" also be platted as an outlot with joint ownership by both lots. This would be in accordance with the code requirements for a minimum lot footage of 200 feet. Drainage and utility easements should be provided five feet wide along both sides of the proposed lot di’/ision line. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly. BONESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson. P.E. SDG:lk 2335 OMst Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 1 A K /:' / / u y CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLI PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address_^' O'ZS // ri b j - - - - - cm OF cm) Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ))K--/X-^J/ 3 FINANCE OFFICE Please check one - Property 150200000 abstract or torrens? QEN 325.(k ,.4.4. V 1 ^ ^Attach legal description to application. RECEIP' 'YOU moor T/*K«iin —-NESOiFY'C-APPLICANT Phone (home) 03/23/ Name P/\uL (jtJ> /Sn / Phone (work ) - f31 / Address/J . ZfaUUl^ City; //cy/iV 2^/i7A Zip; TX39 / ONNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone *! home) Phone (work) Address; __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (attach list it more than one]City;Zip; i EXISTING LAND USB Nvtmber of Tax Parcels / Development Size y.o ii</ Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check)X Residential; no. of units Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ / Present Zoning District /fA /S PROPOSAL >< Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sitejo) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites;/ / Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density; Minimum Lot Size: Units per Acres ^7,/Zg Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use; (check)X Residential Other (specify) Tr i j M .V :KININDM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Cwnpleted Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). As an addendum to this appllcationr please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 2. 3. 4. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature__________________________Date 1 • 2. 3. 4. 5. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Pinal Plat Application is complete Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement $200.00 300.00 X Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class III & all non-residential) 300.00 325.00 + 25.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 175.00 Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application 150.00 Renewal of Final Subdivision Application 100.00 The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional feesastablished by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date / Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held m ^ third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant Is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Build..ng 6 Zoning Office of this chamge prior to the meeting. i , ■ : jMi • nUN DATE 08/21/92 . ' ■ ' ' ' « ♦ \ • ■• . BATCH OOS HEMCPIN COUNTY PROPI RTY XNFORHATXON SYSTEM PROPERTY IPtCRS LIST r PROP AOOR 0»tCR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR SB 25-11B-2S S4 OOOS 00495 SPRXNB HXLL RO R J NXeON SHE NX60N ' RXCHARD J A fURY E NXOON 445 SPRING HXLL RO NAYZATA MN 55S91 PROP AOOR . ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR SO 25-118-25 45 0014 00515 HOLLANOER RO TAP HARBERTS THOMAS A PATRXCXA HARBERTS S15 HOLLANOER RO NAYZATA MN 55591 PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR SO 25-110-25 45 0024 00525 HOLLANOER RO J A C eOLXNVAUX JEROME A CHARLOTTE 60LXNVAUX S25 HOLLANOER RO NAYZATA »M 55591 PROP AOOR CMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR SO 54-110-25 11 0010 00445 FERNOALE RO N RXCHARO E STRANO ETAL RICHARD E A JOAN M STRANO 445 NO FERNOALE RO NAYZATA m 55591 I . ■ ^ _ PROP AOOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR SO 54-118-25 11 0020 00050 AOORESS UNASSXGNEO P N BOYKE A V L BOYKE PAUL N BOYKE 795 NO FERNOALE OR NAYZATA m 55591 ‘4 ■ . t, fe-- iHi^ PROP AOOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR SO 54-110-25 12 0007 00745 FERNOALE RO N JOHN A BER6 A NANCY C BERG JOHN A A NANCY C BERG 745 FERNOALE RO N 0 m 55591 < • t ^ (.■i-k.y;} \ V 50 25-118-25 45 0004 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED J A C GOLXNVAUX JEROME A CHARLOTTE GOLXNVAUX 525 HOLLANOER RO NAYZATA m 55591 58 25-110-25 45 0014 00245 HOLLANOER RO J H HUNOER A J A HUNOER JAMES H I JUDITH A HUNOER 245 HOLLANOER RO NAYZATA MN 55591 58 25-118-25 45 0025 00275 HOLLANOER RO P F BRUER A L J MILLER PAUL F BRUER LINDA J HILLER 275 HOLLANOER RO NAYZATA MN 55591 50 56-118-23 11 0012 00785 FERNOALE RO N ALLE6RA N PARKER PAUL L A ALLEGRA N PARKER 785 FERNOALE RO N NAYZATA MN 55591 58 56-118-25 12 0001 00050 ADDRESS UNASSXGNEO J A C GOLXNVAUX J A C GOLXNVAUX 525 HOLLANDER RO NAYZATA MN 55591 50 56-118-25 12 0008 00755 FERNOALE RO N MARGARET 0 PITTMAN ET AL E E A MARGARET 0 STRICKLAND 755 FERNOALE RO N NAYZATA rtl 55591 • I ! i ,REPORT NO. PI455401 PAGE 14 58 25-118-25 45 0015 00260 HOLLANOER RO LAD GILPIN LARRY A DARYL GILPIN 260 HOLLANDER ROAD NAYZATA MN . 55591 50 25-118-25 45 0017 00259 HOLLANOER RO J C HIGGINS A 0 C HIGGINS PHH US MORTGAGE CORP 55 HAODONFIELO RO CHERRY HILL NJ 08002 ') ■* ‘ .1*. 58 25-118-25 4S 0026 00255 HOLLANDER RO K N MARINE.A K X MARINE KONRAD M A KAY X MARINE 255 HOLLANDER RO NAYZATA m 55591 50 56-118-23 11 0017 00715 FERNOALE RO N RICHARD J LYMAN RICHARD J LYMAN 715 NO FERNOALE RO NAYZATA rt4 55391 30 36-110-23 12 0002 00725 FERNOALE RO N R A R MACLEOD RONALD C MACLEOD 725 N FERNOALE RO NAYZATA HN 55391 svl 38 36-118-25 12 0009 00058 ADDRESS UNASSXGNEO JOHN A BERG A NANCY C BERG JOHN A A NANCY C BERG 745 FERNOALE RO N ORONO MN 55591 >. i , I I 1 I ■iliittiiirfiftiiitiiiiitiitiiA iiiiHiiiiiv 'iteiiiii I V-' run 'OATi oe/21/n :noob:; ’ ’v '-!i BATCH 005 ; Mi ■ . } . . 'Irl' '■ i I ‘ «* J f • 1 • cv * HErtCPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEN )' . .50 5A>118-Z5 12 0015 PROP AOOR 00705 FCRNOALC RO N •N; I > • (■ . OMCR NAHI.;i- PAUL N A VIRGINIA L BOYKE TAXPAYER PAUL N A VIRGINIA L BOYKE NAME/AOOR.;! .795 FERNDALE RO N >i‘ NAYZATA Ml 55591 > • ‘ tV \ I f » % . .‘:f - 56 u •I i . • \ PROP AOOR 00755 LONG LAKE RO E 5A-11B-25 22 0005 . OM«R NAME . P NINSTON A E C NINSTON TAXPAYER : FREOERICK NINSTON NAHE/AODRK 755 SPRING MILL RO .f) NAYZATA Ml 155591 'x:. : ■ •f. ‘ .V: •V», ' 1 F L ‘ ^ I - ! ’i! - f j’ M:/ ,1 • •i!;'’• :;t- , /■ ^ ‘ i • I 4 t- ■ '->5-; >'' • \ I <. ♦ : . Jv. ' V \ 5. f I 0 I •I i ■■ ..ii -V'i • 1; -if ,.} i ■’! *r' ‘ ‘ t I - J ' \ i ’ ‘f!.♦ j.V'* y‘\ Jv VV'. - i:. ;! ‘ ?;■ '•.j; J » • ' ly jiv j it M* ♦.5^' I . N'■' rii V 3 M I ■ « v !rr*'! • I.-. r«*. }■ . . ..-vn •• ■ ll- i.)f V 4 %• A r* y{i « I 4 . .. .9* i * ■ . : i I *. »Ivl * I. I I I ; ♦ r '}M' i 1; •. - m: i' f • • •I' • ‘ J r: /p;-:^., i !*; ; ^ » ** K PROPERTY ONNERS LIST .* A Vl I < •1 * ^ •REPORT NO. PAGE PI435401 15 38 36-118-23 12 0014 007Y5 FERNDALE RO N D R i D J FLATZ DOUGLAS R I DIANE J FUTZ 795 FERNDALE RO N NAYZATA MN 55391* f ^ 56 5A-116-25 12 0015 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO PAUL N A VIRGINIA BOYKE CITY OP ORONO P 0 BOX 6« CRYSTAL BAY Ml 55525 t • < I ‘ J : V • • »* 11 •i; •* t • ' •• •'f. : 111 • |! TOTAL BATCH ; . 005 00022 * L » • I .1 . . I i \ *. ♦* ♦ ' I* I. • •v! J si- I I .• t ’ * . •! i • I I /• , I • f • ••* .n,; •il- I I . . * t 9 • •\ ♦ I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAXAHON* TO THE BEST OF HY KNONLEDGE AND BELIEF 'ki i % (\ I ♦ • I I I i;:- X I . \ » » i % .H’ |!i ^ • 6^ 0? . I ■ w J iin'ifn'il Bill I tj • <(Ml c;TY C- September 11, 1992 > _ _/ iif• j u ;_'rc ‘wt:.-. iLi *j w Li."'"' Mr. Mike Gaffron Asst. Planning and Zoning Admin. Village of Orono Orono, MN SEP 14 «53B Re; #1762 - Paul W. Boyke Subdivision Dear Mr. Gaffron; We are neighbors of Paul Boyke*s living at 265 Hollander Rd. When we purchased our house, our understanc.j.nq was that the lot behind us was long and narrow with a house on the street, but otherwise unbuildable. We considered the lot Mr. Boyke bought to be one of the most beautiful lots in the Orono area with many old oaks, wetland, a lake and many species of wildlife including a fisher, an animal not usually seen in this area. Upon buying the lot, Mr. Boyke immediately subdivided, putting a driveway through the existing property and selling off the house on t.he street and building a house behind. His present proposal would be to add a driveway onto the existing driveway and to build another house, making the houses "three-deep" on the lot. Then to add a little foot path(road?) to allow access to a forth lot to the back or lake side. i We have been involved in comprehensive planning on the village level and have, as the owners of a small office building been involved in development and met with Plymouth's planning Commission on several occasions. Our experience ha-i taught us that the two most important elements in determin.lng whether a property de velopment plan fits into comprehensive planning is consistancy and appropriateness. That is, is it consistant with the development in the village in plan anl layout? Does Orono consistently allow developers to subdivide lots four deep without direct access tc a thoroughfare or would this be the planning of 75 to 100 years ago? If Mr. Boyke had proposed such a development when he originally bought the lot would it have been approved as it is now, as a development ? Is this development appropriate to this area? Does it set back with other homes on the lake? 1 L Page 376-4 of the Shoreland Management Amendment to the Zoning Code speaks to "sensitive resource management". The topographical maps show this house will be located several feet below the land on three sides. With hard-cover what does this mean in terms of run-off from the top house and surrounding drainage? Will this substantially increase pollutant drainage into the wetlands and ultimately the lake? Will this house have serious basement water problems - can it have a basement? Will it need a pumping system to the drainfield. Is this within the code for this area: (Page376-15 speaks to similar issues). Page 376-21 item "B" states "Each lot shall meet the minimum lot size and dimensional requirements set forth) elsewhere"... Does Mr. Boyke have a 2 acre lot without the fourth lot on the lake. These are only some of the issues here, but we feel they are certainly sufficient to deny this request. As stated earlier, we researched that land before we bought this house and found it had no access and was low with poor drainage. This was not a legitimate 2 house lot. It is certainly not a 3 house lot. Thank you for your consideration Jery tru^y ^burs. / James H. Hunder y Judith A. Hunder li September 12,1992 D CITY 0= CRCNC Mr. Michael Gaffron Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Orono, Minnesota SEP 1 7 i992 Re: Proposal #1762- Paul W. Boyke Subdivision Dear Mr. Gaffron: My wife, Linda Miller, and I have resided at 275 Hollander Road for slightly more than one year. Our property abuts the northwestern edge of the land proposed for subdivision. I have lived in the western suburbs of Minneapolis for forty years, and am quite familiar the beautiful wild areas which remain in and around the City of Orono. Lydiard Lake is a prime example of one of these few remaining areas. Obviously, the City of Orono, and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources appreciate Lydiard Lake's uniqueness, and have thus designated it a "Natural Environment", in its Shoreland Management Ordinance, and Shoreland Overlay District Standards. One of the thrusts of the new legislation is to preserve and protect the fragile wetland environments. The natural beauty of Lydiard Lake, and the rural character of Orono were two of the r.iain reasons we moved tc 275 Hollander Road. We have reviewed the materials available concerning Proposal # 1762, and have many reservations about what we have seen. Our first concern is the concept itself. The mandate of the State of Minnesota through the DNR is to preserve and protect the existing "Natural Environments" by limiting future development. Proposal # 17 62 runs counter to the idea of protection and preservation by proposing new construction on the very edge of this uniqiie wetland area. Our second concern was one of appropriateness. The existing level and character of development surrounding Lydiard Lake is not consistent with the proximity proposed in Mr. Boyke's plan. We also have concerns related to the actual suitability of the site itself for the proposed development. The bluff area to the north of the proposed building site is currently covered with many mature trees. What v/ould happen to them? If the are removed, wouldn't the wonderfully varied bird population which currently uses the area be gone as well? Hov/ v/ould the introduction of .tore hardcover effect the run-off and drainage ecosystem alreaay in place? What is the environmental impact of over 600 feet of graded driveway, 500 feet of which borders the edge of the wetlands? Is the soil appropriate for a septic system? VJhat would be the consequence of septic system problems on Lake Lydiard. Our questions and concerns are too numerous to pursue in this letter. i •— r M ir^lrv The resources of the City of Orono Planning Commission and those of its staff will undoubtedly be used to address fully, not only our questions, but those of others, concerning this proposal. We feel strongly, that the proposed subdivision for new residential development on the edge of designated "Natural Environment", runs counter to the concept and intent of protection and preservation of the unique Lydiard Lake area, and that it poses many questions concerning its appropriateness and feasibility. Paul F. Bruer Linda J. Miller 275 Hollander Road Orono, Minnesota I i\ To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:September 18, 1991 Subject:#1764 Austin Evans, 255 Landmark Drive *■ Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing Application: Request to split off a 2 acre building site from Lot 1, Block 1, Bayside Landing. Zoning District: LR-IA, 2 acre minimum. Pertinent Facts Lot 1 (House) Lot 2 (Mew) Lot Area: Dry Wetland Total 2.06 Ac. 2.24 Ac. 1.20 Ac. 0.95 Ac. 4.30 Ac.2.15 Ac. Lot Width:250' +520‘ + List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Comments from City Engineer Copy of Section 10.55, Subd. 15(A-’3) and Flood Fringe/Floodway Definitions Issues 1.Section 10.55, Subd. 15(A-3) allows (for unsewered property) a density credit for "flood fringe" lands equivalent to the amount of dry land, to meet the acreage requirement. Applicant proposes to credit .95 acres of flood fringe with 1.20 acres of dry buildable land to meet the 2 acre requirement for Lot 2. 2.Few subdivisions in staff's recollection have made use of this code section since its adoption in 1979. In perhaps two or three cases, existing lots of record have used the wetland credit for sewered property. Staff has initiated discussions with the applicant's engineer, the City Engineer, and the DNR in attempting to determine whether all of the proposed wetland area to be credited falls within the definition of "flood fringe". Flood Fringe is defined as the area between the floodway elevation (not strictly defined for this wetland as of this I1 .MAduaii.L/.rri(BlBA4da.. Zoning File #1764 September 18, 1992 Page 2 3. 4. r 5. 6. 7. 8. writing) and the flood plain elevation (established at elevation 931.5 based on the culvert contiguity with Stubbs Bay). If the floodway is defined at an elevation near 930.0 or higher, the flood fringe credit may not be available. Under the assumption that enough flood fringe area is available to meet the 2 acre lot area requirement, the proposed lot boundaries allow for adequate area and width for this to be a legitimate building site, although it at first viewing would be perceived as relatively low land. There is a liJcely buildable envelope approximately 120' deep and 130' wide. One other unresolved concern is, if the 929.4 contour continues from Stubbs Bay through the culvert and up the creelc, whether a 75' setback must be required. If so, this would reduce the building envelope width to perhaps 115', still leaving substantial area to develop a residence. The property abuts municipal sewer, and is within the MUSA boundary as recently amended. Only one sewer unit was assessed to the property, intending to serve Lot 1. A stub can easily be provided to serve Lot 2. City policy is to collect the second sewer unit at the time a building permit is issued for the second residence on the property, regardless of which lot the second house is built on. The Orono Park Commission has requested that, in addition to the standard park dedication fee, a 10' bike trail easement be granted over the 10' drainage and utility easement adjacent to Bayside Road. The park fee would be adjusted to compensate for the easement. A copy of the proposed plat has been forward to Hennepin County Department of Transportation for review of a driveway location for Lot 2. We have no response as of this writing. The City Engineer notes a potential concern on driveway location and sight distance, hence any recommendation for approval must be contingent on driveway location approval from Hennepin County. The City has requested an easement through Lot 1 for municipal sewer lines extending northwestward to serve the house at 185 Landmark Drive. The originally proposed easement location was down the old driveway corridor through the center of the lot. Applicant has discussed with Public Works a relocation of that easement to reduce the impact on Lot I's building site. Since Bayside Road is considered a scenic parkway but not an arterial road within the Comprehensive Plan, there is no requirement that access to Lot 2 be provided by an interior roadway system. Zoning File #1764 September 18, 1992 Page 3 9.Regarding lake access, recall that this property was one of two lots gaining access to Stubbs Bay via Outlot A of Bayside Landing, based on the shoreline width. Under the new Shoreland Regulations, the definition of lot width would be a straight line and only one of the Bayside Landing lots would have gained riparian access. For this reason, it is staff's recommendation that no additional lots can gain lake access over Outlot A, but Mr. Evans should be given the choice as to whether Lot 1 or Lot 2 is assigned the existing access rights. E staff Recomaendatii Given the unresolved issues of the creditable flood fringe area, the location of •'•he 929.4 as it continues through the culvert, and the question regarding dri;eway location, staff would recommend tabling of this request. Since this is a public hearing, public comments should be heard and any additional issues found by the Planning Commission should be brought to the attention of the applicant. i \ ; ' »• ^ in C-''- CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION*.^'* »•! I i . • *1»• • *» PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 1 •* « ‘ • /<{ •.^^A V.; 4 y: \\ V ^ • -» • ; •X 1-*“V*J* *.*39 . / V. CITY OF ormo FimnCE OFFICEProperty Identification Number (P.I.D.) OS “//7'^23^003^ H50200000 ZtcrrensT swm%i,oPlease check one - Property abstract or Attach legal description to application A DDT Phone (home) U-7S ' 3f f 3AlrlrljX WUN X Name f^KjS'F ^\Z/?A/_T Phone (work)344-/5 77 Address: lU^O^City:PLiMOUTH Zips ONNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Nimber of Tax Parcels / Develooment Size S»2 f _Acres Dry Land • J./f Acres Wet Land e Acres Total, all parcels ’ Present Use (check) "X Residential; no. of other (soecifv) units Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line rearrangement Only (no new building sites)' _ Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: _ _ _/Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Units per Acres y/, JW Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land X Residential Other (specify) jiaa. 2. 3. MININDM MATERIAL NBCBSSARy FOR COMPLETE PR^IMIMARY APPLICATION 1, Completed Application. Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Suxrvey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). . -V*. As an addendum to this applicatioiTr * pl'ease* attach a separate list of any other p^-ron^, wish ..notified of this application. 4. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easementsr Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III)$200.00 Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subd*ivision) 300.00 300.00 X Preliminary Review (Class III & airn .non-residential) • * *> 'X . 325.00 + 25.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 175.00 Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application 150.00 100.00 The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Auf i9i^ Applicant must have all submittals^ into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 2 \gf *4 •» 10 :si uo 1 V!) 1 ?% • EILEEN ^ ■anr ^ (3*» 'I* C'l K ^ - SL^Jl '««i • »i (20)(20 (12) ^ V^(23) (24» ^ • • A 7^ ^ a . (25) ^ • - ' /ni _R • st ^ • i\r' 1 . "J* .» j?»i « . //I * » ••' 2t) *R r»ij0l f »^i-V . U ' f ^ ^ 7TI »R \ -. fL i ff)<•«’iC ^ :;■ > -.: 1 , «tn: '» •♦/ R R » 12) % R» M If i it tr 1 u i R ■ntl »r .Y F • 1 •5) • i>« « f? / IT •» / •' «•) • «%-|!!.••/ jii •M • ^4§ t ®‘-/ "^iczaiir tf n « • • r ^^^DBjzgOT'gA^ •# ■. »• •. / • 1 n)'Ci/^f'-T (•• • ' ••ft ’ • I M; ••• • » 0U^VQ) IL0l^\ i . * • ! .»• 0 , * RUN DATE Oa/25/92 BATCH 002 HEftCPIN COIMTV PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY ONNERS LIST PROP AOOR ONNER NAME taxpayer NAME/ADOR PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR PROP ADOR OIMER NAME TAXPAYER NAt«/AOOR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR Pi»f' AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER . NAHE/AOOR « . SO 05-117-23 21 0005 03700 BAYSIDE RO HAZEL ANDERSON HAZEL ANDERSON 3700 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55354 30 05-117-23 22 0007 03940 BAYSIDE RO MICHAEL 6 FILBRANOT MICHAEL FILBRANOT 3940 BAYSIDE RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 / i 30 05-117-23 22 0011 00175 LANDMARK OR L C HARREN A J M HARREN LEE C A JULIE M HARREN 175 LANDMARK DR L0FI6 LAKE MN 55354 30 05-117-23 23 0004 03945 BAYSIDE RD FRED BLANCH JR FRED BLANCH JR 3945 BAYSIDE RO LONO LAKE FM 55354 » I, • f| : « . » I . 30 05-117-23 23 0000 03045 BAYSIDE RO OAK DIANIS DAVID DIANIS 579 N E PLANTATION RO t410N STUART FL 34994 30 05-117-23 23 0011 00324 HESTLAKE ST C E MILLER ETAL BLAKE M BICHANICH 324 NESTLAKE ST LONO LAKE MN 55354 V • ii I • 30 05-117-23 21 0015 03750 BAYSIDE RO JOHN BURGER ETAL JOHN BURGER 3750 BAYSIOE RO LONG LAKE MN 55354 30 05-117-23 22 0000 00105 LANDMARK DR BETTY MINER ET AL RICHARD F A KATHLEEN A KYLE 105 LANDMARK DR LONG LAKE MN 55354 30 05-117-23 22 0012 00040 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED BETTY L MINER PAUL SNANSON ADDRESS UNKNONN 30 05-117-23 23 0004 03045 BAYSIDE RD J B THIESSE ASA THIESSE JOHN B A SHERRI A THIESSE 3045 BAYSIDE RO LONG LAKE MN 55354 30 05-117-23 23 0009 03095 BA :•tf RO C J MEZZENGA A j? K MEZZENGA CHRISTOPHER/EU>LNiA MEZZENGA 3095 BAYSIOE RUU> LONG LAKE MN 30 05-117-23 23 0012 00332 NESTLAKE ST F E LONRY ETAL BLAKE M BICHANICH 332 NESTLAKE ST LONG LAKE 55354 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 3 • I* » 30 05-117-23 22 0004 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO M 6 A S R FILBRANOT MICHAEL FILBRANOT 3960 BAYSIDE RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 30 05-117-23 22 0010 00055 LANDMARK DR VICKIE J ROSS VICKIE J ROSS 55 LANDMARK DR LONG LAKE MN 55354 ’ ‘: '• • •' < . • i ) • • *3 I . * t > * « •# * . ; 1 • • 30 05-117-23 22 0013 00040 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO GARY N A VICKIE J ROSS GARY N A VICKIE J ROSS 40 SMITH AVE HAYZATA MN 55391 . * * ; ^ * f « i i t * 30 05-117-23 23 0007 03055 BAYSIOE RO PEGGY PETERSON PEGGY PETERSON >: 3055 BAYSIDE RO LONG LAKE MN 55354 * J * * • 4 , i •r-.Vv • I * t! » 30 05-117-23 23 0010 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO OAK DIANIS DAVID DIANIS 579 NE PLANTATION RD 0410N STUART FL 34994 * • . I V’ ‘ '^1 ■ -v» 1 :: J ■$' I • •J. -,., • , ^i > i • *T A 1 I 30 05-117-23 23 0013 00340 HESTLAKE ST C STENOERSON A C HARRER CARL STENOERSON 3112 NOOOLAHN AVE HAYZATA MN 55391 . A *f ' ' f ‘it t . • • 0 1 1* t ) . • J 1 4 - '•'i* ’ ‘I * • * ^ J. * - • ! •■•"I IN ; •, . • . • * 1 i • 4' ' * >• A * I. . ) \ ^ I*' f• «*: j {. I * ■i <,: ’ • < i i•..7 - I f 1 1 . RUN DATE Oa/25/92 BATCH 002 PROP AOOR OltCR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR 0»tCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR . I PROP AOOR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER , NAME/AOOR I ’ONNER MME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR ( HENNEPIN COWTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OltlERS LIST I SO 05-117-2S 2S OOIA 005A6 HESTLAKE ST R B MARSH I P A MARSH ROOERIC B MARSH A • PATRICIA A MARSH SAB MESTLAKE ST lont; lake m ssssa SB 05-117-2S 2S 002S OOOSO ADDRESS UNASSIONEO RAD OLSEN RONALD 6 OLSEN SAl NEST LAKE ST LONG LAKE 55S5A SB 05-II7-2S 2S OOSA 00255 LANDMARK OR A H EVANS A 0 EVANS AUSTIN H A DIANE EVANS IA05 KIN6SVIEN LA PLYMOUTH MN 55AA7 SB 05-I17-2S 2A 0100 OOOSB AOORESS UNASSIGNEO SAC Gfci'OINER STEVE GARDlNtK 5770 BAYSIOE RD LONG LAKE fPI 55S5A ' : .(♦ • ■I •I SB 05-117-25 2A 0105 OOOSB AOORESS UNASSIGNED SAC GARDINER STEVE GARDINER 5770 BAYSIOE RO LOIC LAKE MN 5555A ♦ iI < I i I i E I I. {• !• * I SB 05-117-23 2S 0021 0OS09 HESTLAKE ST 6 S PERL A B J PERL GREGG S A BETTE J PERL S09 N LAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55S5B SB 05-117-2S 2S 0029 00S91 HESTLAKE ST RONALD G A DEBBIE K OLSEN RONALD OLSEN 1905 KINGSVIEH LA PLYMOUTH m 55997 ' SB 05-117-25 23 00S5 A- OOOSO ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO A H EVANS A 0 EVANS AUSTIN H A DIANE EVANS 1905 KINGSVIEH LA PLYMOUTH m 55997 SB 05-117-2S 29 0101 0S770 ftVSIOE RD SAC GARDINER STEVE GARDINER 3770 B .YSIDE RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 SB 05-117-23 29 Dili 03775 BAYSIDS RO G R A CE RQHLETTE GERALD L ROHLETTE 3775 BAYSIOE RO LONG LAKE MN 5SS56 . • . .• I. REPORT NO. P19S5901 SB 05-117-23 23 0022 00S25 HESTLAKE ST RAO OLSEN RONALD G OLSEN . < 391 ICST LAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 *' SO 05-117-23 2S OOSS OOOSB AOORESS UNASSIGNEO MICHAEL G FILBRANOT . MICHAEL FILBRANOT 3960 BAYSIOE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 30 05-117-23 2S 0036 OOOSB AOORESS UNASSIGNEO EST OF ANOREN MINER CITY OF ORONO PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY m 55359 !»■ TOTAL BATCH 30 05-117-23 29 0102 OOOSB AOORESS UNASSIGH* • SAC GARDINER STEVE GARDINER 3770 BAYSIOE RO . ■ LONG LAKE MN 55356 < • • * i f Scale o Denotes For purpotts of hot on ottumeC Lake Minneton HIghttI known w( N.6.V.0.I929.C Btnchmork It o CItvollon It 952 DRAINAGE a I * <l Eotl lint ond lit Sly ’’tiltntionof Lot IST, OllovllltonLoItt Mika Btlnf 5XX>fttlii thettn, ond btiny •he«n on Hit plo obondontd rir* ..Eotl lint efVokt Sirtti at dtdicoltd In plijl ofOlloidllt on Ldko MInntlonko South lint of NE 1/4 of SW1/4 of NWI/4 of Stc. 5 CC 0_ Ctnftrllnt of Co. currtnily occupied SEE DETAIL A r p Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Otto 6 Pon^^tfoo PE PLcn w *»£ • Joirpn C AnOffMi. P£ Marv;n L Scrva'J. PE E PE C^cnn R Coc^i. PE IhofTM £ Noytv PE ltet)cn G Scf>un<rtf. PR Suwn M E&f'tin. C PA CcnsiiUnt Engineers & Architects A Sjf'fc'd PE 1*^ ^ ^E RoOen R P^cftrr^ PE R<hafd W Fester. PE O Lcsiiow. PE Pcfcert C Russes A i A Jerry A Bou'Con. PE MjOt A Hanson PE M*chjei T Rautmano, PE Tee K Fr'j PE Thomas R Ance^vx* AiA Donaie c Burgaret. PE Thomas E Argul PE Ga’>* f Ry-ra'xier PE PE KUhac; P Pau PE Agnes M Ring AiC P Thomas W PprerjOT' PE M<hacl C L>hCh. PE James R Maiarsd. Pf Jerry O Ptnneh. PE Kenneth P ArvJerson PE Mark P RdifV PE Mar» A Se^ PE Gary W Mor»en. PE Dan^ J Eegerton. PE Phrf*p j CasweM PE .^t.uk D VV*ar».s PE M es 0 Jensen. PE L Pr^iibp Gravei «i PE Karen l Wiemen. PE F ToJd Foster. PE <e-!h R Yapp PE Shawn D GusUfson. P£ Ceciiio Owvier. PE Charts A EfKkSOn Lro M Pawe sky Ha/tan M Oison James F Efsgeiharot September 17. 1992 Mr. Mike Gaffron City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: #1764 Austin Evans Subdivision File No. 139-1764 Dear Mike: We have reviewed the proposed subdivision of Lot 1, Block 1, Bayside Landing addition on the Austin Evans property, located along the north side of Bayside Road (Co. Rd. No. 84). Subsequent to our site inspection, there are several engineering issues that should be noted. The buildable property is located on the fringe of a large Type 2 wetland, or "Inland Fresh Meadow". This type of wetland usually has some standing water in the spring, but rarely in the summer except following heavy rains. The wetland is regulated by *he \f my Corps of Engineers (COE) and falls under the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991. 1 • .jjso located within the floodplain of Lake Minnetonka (HWL 931.5). Minnehaha Creek Vvauii^ntd, COE, and Wetland Conservation Act permits will be required if any hll is to be placed within the floodplain and wetland. The driveway locations should be determined at this time. The Hennepin County Public Works Department should review these locations as an access permit will eventually be required. The locations will be subject to poor vehicle sight distance due to the vertical and horizontal curvature of Bayside Road. Sanitaiy sewer is proposed to be constructed within the next month to serve this prop' riy and one adjacent lot to the north and west. The sewer manhole and a stub outside of Bayside Road are already constructed. The stub is located at the existing gravel driveway that runs through Lot 1. A twenty foot wide utility easement and a fifty foot wide construction easement should be provided along the center of the existing driveway, extending to the north property line. Lot 1 will be serviced off this lateral line. Lot 2 can be serviced off of the trunk line located aIo;.g the north side of Bayside Road. The existing 24 inch culvert should be shown on the site plan and the 930 contour should be continued. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly. BO^STROO. ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Shawn D. Gustafson. P.E. SDG:lk TS5 Wiest Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 i Lv facilities. § 10.55 Subd. 13. City Determination. Based upon the technical evaluation of the designated engineer or expert, and based upon the factors listed above, the City shall determine whether the proposed use is in the floodway or flood fringe and the regulatory flood protection elevation at the site. Subd. 14. Conditions Attached to Conditional Use Permits. Upon consideration of the factors listed above and the purposes of this Section, the City may attach such conditions to the granting of a conditional use permit as it deems necessary to fulfill the purposes of this Section. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, the following: A. Modification of waste disposal and water supply B. Limitations on period of use, occupancy and operation. imposition of operational controls, sureties, and deed restrictions. . - iD. Requirements for construction of channel modifications, dikes, levees, and other protective measures. E. Flood proofing measures, in accordance with tne State Building Code. The applicant shall submit a plan or document certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the flood proofing measures are consistent with the regulatory flood protection elevation and associated flood factors for the particular area. Subd. 15. Land Development and Platting. No part of any lot within the Flood Plain and Wetlands Conservation Area shall be platted for residential occupancy or for other uses which will increase the danger to health, life, property or the public welfare. All lots containing land within the flood plain districts shall contain a building site above the regulatory flood Protection elevation. All subdivisions shall have water and sewage dispose facilities that comply with the provisions of this Section and have road access no lower than two feet below the regulatory flood protection elevation. Whenever a portion of the Flood Plain and Wetlands Conservation Area is located within or adpoins a ^rea. that is being subdivided, the subdivider shall dedicate to the City an adequate %rpetual easement over the land within the protected area and along each side of such area for the purpose of improving or protecting the area for drainage or other purposes expressed in this Section and other recreational uses, as determined by Council. Public or private streets, driveways, drainage openings and culverts shall not be constructed unless the design been approved by the City, and such structures ® shall as not to restrict the flow of water. Subdivision provide all certified engineering data, s^jieys, site plan , flowage calculations and other information as-^he City in order to determine the effects o^such development otK^^the affected land and water areas. ' ' ORONO CC 370 (4-1-34) r * § 10.55 A. Minimum Lot Area Requirements. The minimum lot area reauirements of this Chapter shall be interpreted to mean that of the reciuired land area for each building site shall be in one contiguous parcel undivided by Floodway or Flood Fringe and no land within the protected area shall be included in determination of minimum lot area, except as specifically provided for herein: 1. For properties not served by municipal sanitary sewer, the minimum lot area may be divided by Flood Fringe lands provided at least 2.0 acres of land not within the protected area is included in one contiguous parcel and legal access is available to that building site without encroachment on the protected area. 2. For properties served by municipal sanitary provi'ae/^N o! landthf p^coteo?ed area is included in one contiguous parcel and both municipal sewer and legal access is available to that building site without encroachment on the protected area. 3 For residential properties served by municipal sanitary sewer, a limited density credit may be allowed for inclusion of Flood Fringe lands as part of the required minimum sTa=V,“ blul?n^“^f to°”"la"nd " r\^ioror^ othe"r ^ s'imfg rwrei'irde‘veloyr'’^f^^"chpr;VeT;^U of his land within the Flood Fringe equal to, but not exceeding, the amount of his adjacent land which otherwise qualified for development under this Chapter. Such credit shall be upon dedication of perpetual open space and flowage the City over all protected areas so utilized for density credit. ^ Subd. 16. Special Assessments. The land area in the Flood Plain and Wetlands Conservation Area which is not to be developed and is not used for credit as in Subparagraph A, Item 3 of Subdivision 15, and which is dedicated as an easement shall not be subject to special assessmenis to defray municipal improvement projects, including but not limited to trunk sanitary sewer and water mains and storm sewer improvements. consbcuctfon^’^or L’ufi^?irob=s\iuct\7n o'l\V;Vloo*a“p\iy;ah"d obstruction has been obtained in the manner provided herein. A Removal of Artificial Obstruction. If an ORONO CC 371 (4-1-34) § 10.55 12. "Regional Flood" - A flood which is representative of large floods known to have occurred generally in Minnesota and reasonably characteristic of what can be expected to occur on an average-frequency in the magnitude of the 100-year recurrence interval. Regional flood is synonymous with the term "base flood" used in the Flood Insurance Study. 13. "Structure" - Anything, or part thereof, which is built, constructed or erected, an edifice or building of any kind, or any piece of work artificially built up or composed of parts joined together in some definite manner, which requires a location on, below, or above the ground, land, or water. 14. "Wetlands or Marshland" - Lowlands covered with shallow and sometimes temporary or intermittent waters and also identifiable by wetlands vegetation and soil types. 15. "Wetlands Vegetation Types" - Including, but not limited to, bulrushes, cattails, arrowhead, sedges, marsh grasses as identified by the Hennepin Soil and Water Conservation District and/or Circular"39 of the United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 16. "Wetlands Soil Types" - Including, but not limited to. Marsh (Ma), Peat and Peaty Muck fPa, Pm) Lake Beaches (Lc, Ld), Hamel (Ha), and Glencoe (Gc) as identified and classified by the Hennepin Soil and Water Conservation District and/or Circular 39 of the United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. Subd. 4. Definition and Establishment of Protected Areas. The "Flood Plain and Wetlands Conservation Area", hereinafter referred to as the protected area, is defined and established to be the low areas* and flood plain adjoining and including any watercourse or drainage way or body of water subject to periodic flooding or overflow. These areas are divided into the following three protected area districts: A. Floodway District (FW) - The Floodway District shall include those areas designated as floodway in the Flood Insurance Study, including without limitation the surf ace and shoreline of Lake Minnetonka below elevation 929.4 MSL, the surface and shoreline of other lakes, ponds and wetlands below the ordinary highwater elevation, and the designated floodway of all streams and flowago areas. B. Flood Fringe District (FFD) - The Flood Fringe district shall include those areas designated as floodway fringe in the Flood Insurance Study, including without limitation the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka between elevations 929.4 MSL and 931.5 MSL, the area between the floodway and the edge of the 100 —year flood on all other lakes, ponds and streams, all designated sheet ORONO CC 363 (4-1-84) S 10.55 r*' flow areas, all intermittent streams, and ponding areas and all lands containing soil types classified as wetlands soils (defined herein), whether or not there is water standing on those soils at any given time. C. General Flood Plain District (GFP) - The General &«!!!" iiSllf'Pfi Itopographic data (at contour intervals 9>^eater than two feet) and/or other engineering analysis sufficient ^he City to determine the actual extent of the Flood Way Fringe. Upon such determination, the restrictions of the FW and FFD Districts shall apply. Subd 5 Official Flood Protection Maps. The boundaries maps: A. Those areas designated and shown as stream, lake, marsh, wooded marsh, submerged marsh, intermittent lake or intermittent streams by the United States department of the Interior, through the Geological Survey on map^ and supporting data designated as Mound Quadrangle, Minnesota NW/4 Lake Minnetonka (1958)] and Excelsior Quadrangle, Minnesota (NW/4 Lake Minnetonka (1958)]. B. Those areas designated and shown as wetlands soil types on the Wetlands Inventory and Classification aerial Plet mlp overlays prepared by the Hennepin Soil and Water Conservation District (June, 1975) . C. Those areas designated and shown as General Flood Plain, Floodway or Flood Fringe by the .Federal Administration on the Flood Boundary and Floodway Maps, O^ono, Minnesota, and Flood Insurance Rate Maps, Orono, October 17, 1978. Specifically included herein is the explanatory material and tabular information contained in the Administration Flood Insurance Study for. Orono, Minnesota, dated April, 1978. D '’'’he above maps and studies are hereby adopted by reference as the official maps for the ®stablishment of the Flood ?LVkMd«inlsttat«Vnd^\all‘’be Tailible £or public review during all normal office hours. ORONO Ci 364 (4-1-84) • • • • PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR • • ■ AUSTIN EVANS F U>T t BtOCK \ MirSlOE lANDINQ HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA w * N W* J5'Vw < \ •« lESAL ?EimStS; lot I. HockT. MTilBl USOIM i!‘do«"not tSJJSJi M SSS i!y ____ JL__nfi n riF n n m-rm-fii niiiMi iTMTi'tilTinrtnrrfl jr To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Michael P. Gaffron^ Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:September 17, 1992 Subject: #1621 Terry and Jonell Johnson, 1045 Linden Lane Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing Application: Hardcover and setback remodeling of residence variances for major List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Revised Survey with Grading Plan Plan "D" Floor Plan and East Elevation Notice of Planning Commission Action 3/21/91 Planning Commission Minutes 2/19/91 & 3/18/91 Memo and Exhibits 3/11/91 Note: The property owners list has been renotified. Discussion The applicants have again revised their plans, which were last reviewed by the Planning Commission in March 1991 and tabled for revision. A grading plan was also required. A grading plan has been submitted and appears to provide a swale and driveway apron slopes which are intended to intercept runoff coming down the driveway and move it around the garage, while maintaining the general runoff pattern as previously existed. Since the last floor plan review, the following revisions have been made (compare this with the Plan C changes on the March 11, 1991 memo): 1. Bumpout addition at northeast corner has been reduced. 2.The upper story decks on the lake side have been eliminated. 3.The garage and recreation area above it have been shortened slightly and pulled back to meet the required 10* side setback. Hardcover in the 0-75* zone appears to be identical to the 7.2% proposed with Plan C. In the 75-250' zone, the reductions in the garage and room additions amount to approximately 117 s.f., or 39.7%. The 250-500' zone still proposes significant removals leaving 23.3%. The table below summarizes the hit.tory of revisions to these plans. > i ' Zoning File #1621 September 17, 1992 Page 2 Existing Plan A plan B Plan C Plan D A1lowed 0-75'8.9%8.1%7.0%7.2%7.2%0% 75-250*22.1%38.9%38.9%40.6%39.7%25%250-500'76.1%61.7%61.7%23.3%23.3%30%Entire Lot 21.9%28.4%28.0%25.2%24.8%15.2% Issues 1. Is the porch/portico with roof and pillars in the 0-75' zone necessary for aesthetic purposes.and does that justify the granting of a variance? 2.Should some of the proposed deck areas along the lake side in the 0-75' zone be eliminated? How necessary is the deck on the second level behind the garage? 3.Is removal of the detached garage and parking area near the road a reasonable tradeoff for the hardcover additions in the 75-250' zone? Action Requested 1. Make a recommendation regarding the hardcover increases. 2.Make a recommendation regarding the additional structure (decks/porch/second story) in 0-75' zone. 3.If the current plan is not acceptable, give applicant specific direction as to necessary revisions to gain a recommendation for approval. Isv 1 1 fl CITY OF ORONO ZONING FILE #1621 p O Box S6 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ TOs Terry 6 Jonell Johnson COPIES TO: 1045 Linden Lane Mound, MN 55364 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ^TB^OrilEETING: 3-18/20 91 VOTE: 4 For 0 Against Plamiiiig CoBOsission recouHiiends the followxng • Tabled for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1*. Applicant to provide grading/drainage plan to ccT'firm that runoff can be^directed so as to not affect applicants proposed improvements nor neighboring properties. 2. Mixed direction regarding additional deck and portico in 0-75'j recommended to move bulk of deck additions to 75-250 zone. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon additional information. Deadline for the April 15 meeting is April 5, 1991. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. Isv i t i ii ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 19, 1991 (#3)ZONING FILE 11609-BROCK CONTINUED Hanson asked Ms. Brock if she would Planning Commission table her application. prefer to have the Ms. Brock stated that this problem has been causing her grief since it began and she wanted to resolve it. ^^0j»0 rjo public comments on this application* with the exception of a letter dated November 17, 1990, fron Ken Roelofs, and Kelley closed the Public Hearing at 8:30 p.m. It was moved bv Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to recommend aoDroval of the aker-the-fact hardcover Variance, provided hardcover within the 75-250* zone does not exceed the existing hardcover percentage of 30.4%. This applies only to the deck. It is further recommend«2d that Council deny^ the Variance requested for the catwalk, based on a lack of hardship. Motion, Ayes-4, Rowlette and Moos. Nay. Moos and Rowlette did not believe that the catwalk would interfere with runo - and that it complies with the intent of the Hardcover Ordir:*nce. Kelley added that if the applicant wishes to propose a i>lan showing a stairway exiting the rear area of the second f-oor, that she would need to bring that back for Planning Commission’s consideration. (#4)ZONING FILE #1621-TERRY & JONELL JOHNSON 1045 LINDEN LANE PUBLIC HEARING-VARIANCES Terry Johnson was present. Kelley opened the Public Hearing at 8:38 p.m. and asked Gaffron to make his opening comments. Gaffron summarized the issues pertaining to this application stated in his February 13, 1991 memo to the Planningas stat Commission. Bellows stated that, in her opinion, the applicants' plan is overly ambitious for the property. She also stated that the lake is low and makes it difficult to tell how far the lake normally comes on the property. Gaffron said, "Thsre is no question that the lake is farther out. The 75' setback line is measured from the riprap." Bellows said, "If the applicants wish to undertake a remodeling project, it must occur within the existing confines or extend out in another location. I cannot allow this house to creep any closer to the lake than it does currently." Terry Johnson stated that he had explored other options, but due to the interior layout of the house, and other setack - 11 -I ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 19, 1991 (i4)ZONING FILE #1621-TERRY JOHNSON CONTINUED ^ ^ ilVroTcZenls. tL plan proposed represented added that the distance between the houoe and approximately) posed a hardship. He sai , it is raining my wife to luc groceries that far, especially if 9^ or really cold." Cohen stated that he concurred with Bellows. He added that he may give the applicants some consideration about the garage situation, but that there has to be a reduction in hardcover. Johnson stated that he would be willing to remove some of the gravel and the detached garage. Bellows noted that the detached garage and gravel area is out.side of the 75-250' setback area. Hanson said, "I would consider that to be an improvement to the property as a whole." favorabVj^oran^additii'n "to "tl'e"®existing house if°those^two items iLf-fe; trtrirti^rh-s-^^a^s7„en^i"gr"Txte"^?s^ the addition toward the lake is something else. Cohen asked Mr. Johnson if he would like the application tabled. Johnson stated that he would like an opportunity to revise his plan. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Moos, to table this application as requested by the applicant. (#5)PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING-CODE AMENDMENTS , It was agreed by the Planning Commission to schedule a Public Hearing regarding Code A-nenaaents for M-^^ch 4, 1991 a 7:00 p.m. Rowlette indicated that she would be unable to attend. (#6)WORK Commission agreed to review the Code Amendments in conjunction with the March 4, 1991 Public Hearing. (7)APPROVAL OF MINUTES . It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Moos' ^o ^ minutes of the Planning Commission meeting held January 22, 19^1. Motion, Ayes-6, Nays-0. Motion passed. PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE It was agreed that Sara Moos would attend the March 11, 1991 Council meeting as the Planning Commission Representative. - 12 - 4 I 1 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 18» 1991 (#3)ZONING FILE #1621-TERRY & JONELL JOHNSON 1045 LINDEN LANE VARIANCES-CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING Terry Johnson was present. re—convened the Public Hearing on this matter at 7.40 p.m Gaffron briefly reviewed the Johnson's revised p.lan, as noted in his memo dated March 11» 1991. Terry Johnson noted that it was not his intention to encroach into the side yard setback area, and that tne deck behind the garage would meet that setback. possible for t.he applicants to request additional J? the 250-500' at some later date. Hardcover the 2j0-500 setback area would only be 23%, and 30% is allowed. Gaffron suggested that the resolution could state that hardcover on the entire lot cannot exceed 25.2%. Kelley asked Johnson if he would be amenable to entirely removing the deck on the back of garage. Johnson replied, "If we could keep the deck along the front of the house, we would not mind excluding the deck on the ac o the garage." s. “S'" f road down to the house." Johnson stated that the previous owners had devised a method for diverting water around the side of the garage.fjmwMmmmbeing prepared that will channel all that water around the house and dump it in the 0-75' setback area. Johnson stated that he would provide more information in accordance with Bellows' concerns. - 6 - Jk r PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 18, 1991 (#3)ZONING FILE #1621-TERRY JOHNSON CONTINUED Kelley asked Bellows for her opinion of the rest of .he propose if the water channelization can be aacressed. Bellows replied, "I normallydo not like to see decks proposed for the front of the house. th&r-e is a small boathouse structure on the p°op«v *^:oei%h%%\«u7plre"^n excfan^e for the decKs end overhangs. Bellows and Kelley stated that it may be necessary for the boathouse structure to be removed without any trade-off. Hanson indicated that he such “’f limited a?eli! anr the potential water problem compounds that situation.” ,, M’* Johnson come back before the Planning Comm's^on with' end drainage on the property. f® “e llvllopment of the Maureen still ^avejome g^u«ti_^^^ or'’th'^^' garkgl and the newly discovered shed/boathou.e is removed.” Bellows said, "I would r^’^the'^hoSsr”''*’®remain, in lieu of the deck on the fron- of the hou . Hanson agreed that he preferred the garage deck to the front deck on the house. The Public Hearing was continued. (#4)ZONING FILE #1622-JOHN F. HARDIN 1496 PARK DRIVE VARIANCE-PUBLIC HEARING John Hardin was present Kelley opened the Public Hearing at 7:50 p.m., and asked Gaffron to make his opening presentation daffron' reviewed Mr. He"Vhowed where lSe-'"o"he“''house\ ii Mr! Hard'in's neighborhood are located in relation to the front yard setback. Kelley asked H.ircin to state his hardship for the Variance he is requesting. - 7 - f I — -J I n In e . -•i" - '4- I pC^l^sAtS ^As ' ' -// 2-7/sS =: /o X/'S - ‘^/z. /So > 2. 5rT. -)S--2CT5 It. Art<^o a4 pi^A^C-O^f T)^ “3^*7" — 60 - r*> 1 £>•'■^5'' C l4-?-fJCi^ jv/oc^ /’Caaj 2^SZ> - TOO *1 To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date March 11, 1991 Subject: #1621 Terry & Jonell Johnson, 1045 Linden Lane Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Revised Site Plan Revised Hardcover Review & Summary Plan "C" Floor Plans & Elevations Planning Commission Action Notice 2/22/91 Memo & Exhibits of 2/13/91 Discussion - The applicants have revised their plan, and have provided a new plan, "Plan C". This plan exhibits the following changes from earlier plans A & B: 1. No new enclosed space in 0-75' zone (but there is a proposed roofed portico extending lakeward from the house). 2. First story deck extended to full length of house. 3. Second story decks added 4. Deck added behind garage (NEEDS SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE OF 2'). 5. Room additions to east of existing house wall, two stories high. 6. Driveway plan same as staff had indicated previously. 7. Remove detached garage and gravel parking area in 250 500' zone. The new plan provides a slightly smaller decrease in 0-75' hardcover, and a slight increase in 75-250' hardcover over previous plans, but removes the detached garage and parking area in the 250-500' zone. Overall, the hardcover increases from an existing 21.9% of the entire lot to 25.2% of the entire lot. Hardcover percentages are summarized below (also see Exhibit B, which indicates the structural/non-structural breakdown): E: Zoning File #1621 March 11, 1991 Page 2 of 2 0-75' 75-250’ 250-500' Entire Lot Existing 8.9% 22.1% 76.1% 21.9% Plan A Plan B Plan C Allowed 8.1% 38.9% 61.7% 28.4% 7.0% 38.9% 61,7% 28.0% 7.1% 40.6% 23.3% 25.2% 0% 25% 30% 15.2% In the 0-75' zone, the applicants are extending the 8' wide deck the entire length of the house, and, to break up the lakeshore wall of the house, proposing to install a 10'x8' portico roofed at the second story (see elevation views). While applicants would likely agree to resolution language that prohibits enclosure of this portico/porch, its intent and function is still to be as structural detail in the 0-75' zone. The additional deck behind the garage and the room expansions eastward from the existing house both yield an increase in 75-250' hardcover. Applicants have stated to staff that if the attached garage addition is approved, they could remove the existing detached garage and gravel parking area, yielding a significant hardcover decrease in the 250-500' zone. The new plan exhibits no change in the previously proposed driveway or sidewalk layout. In reviewing this application. Planning Commission may wish to consider the following issues: - Is the portico with roof and pillars in the 0-75' zone necessary for aesthetic purposes, and does that justify granting of a variance? - Can some of the deck area in the 0-75' zone be eliminated? - How necessary is the 75-250' deck behind the garage? - Is there any hardship to grant a 2' side setback variance for that deck? - Is the removal of the detached garage and parking areas a reasonable tradeoff for the hardcover additions in the 250- 500' zone? Staff RecosDBendation - If Planning Commission finds that sufficient justification exists to recommend approval of Plan C, then a recommendation for approval would be appropriate. If Planning Commission so desires, approval could be conditioned on elimination of specific aspects of Plan C, If Planning Commission feels that Plan C is not appropriate and can't be easily revised to meet Planning Commission's goals for this property, then a recommendation for denial or a tabling of the application would be in order. If the request is tabled. Planning Commission should give applicants direction for revising their plan. • ^o ^ /7.--rn / "3:> 1 "t>-J c> ? ^. ^ sj IS s K ^ %; i; *4▼ IT* ••*«• i{ * . . 1 h-.s'oi-n / ej r' /■■ ,a<t'' \\ •*-«• »•*.3..., X’ \ T \ 1'' V V ^ 1 * Si| • ^ |5^nir ::^ ^\ 1 |U' t' 1 u fr■ '• i?\l o—B ^-|Li___ «>. * .'<1 O ^ 'J^l ^ (K> '.V K ^1 1 ^ J - l^.eT'Ao^e fe5?<;sT7^^ Ae/^\j^ 6^ve C—*/3,2. idC.'^ C—s^sa. sx.^ -♦- d,2o a t>ao *^2,2 ‘ •^/Oo 5^-ne.u c. h -C f^/i-o<^ostf^ ~ ^ U M. (>tc //o-s.*^.") ^?</5r7AJC a ^ou^ci. '"'7 5r-ti« c Uoh 1%H 0 ”“75' :'r«i<c 3»fe /2.0 1 2.0 .1 to . ^-75' TZ>rAu (p.*?(a»v,) I^H C~?>o */-*)r-?./ v.''^ o (^ <0 VC. 7^'2^ s*Tt «c ZSio t^io 75’''ZS0 A>tfw-:TKwc./fc&V *E">2.r z^zr 00<r7 r' 2.50 fVTfi'i--T^ii 5^sr siir 5-y6<i 3ZC,& (22./ *4 (39.1 1 (3a.«>v.‘) (t/o,(,/C^ 9 2^S0^Sl?O Stkmc .V3Z.Vsz.V2^<:> 2rD'5^ r> /n -um '^«a*c . IS^"^/^o&1 20 &U10 ZJD'^o’ 7»r6c ZoxH K'^O !U yo c^zo 7^a (■>t..iy.>(il.T ‘/.^'('233/0 ^ iSi-* ^7 ^Teu c :oTf^\^3S2.U Z^OCp 326:»| Z'/aN''.tmc lyTAL.M2.sE V253 3(^V'o .• TPTArU Uoo3^•7771 76^(^701 V/&C. OF t-oT Cu.‘iy,'^(^8>,oT4'^C2S:2%^6s,2 7d’) .>1 ^____^ tiflrillhkM'I J -toVe*.: .I •• • \...ii_____«i-^ii|. ■ rr-rn— j~j: r-^—■ * . • ii • * •! ’ 1 • I —**" • N I ’ i’-' V ii •• ! ‘I • ! • • >.. 'i-i! !• , *1 : r.ii r ;(>ii‘ii!i » I • J * !* I .VI r- •• I . rl ii • I I • !• I .1 ■ I I BgL:|-.rsT_^=:s-|z=rr^ ; t • I t ■i ii 'I li'i I — - — % • I S>K*~ "4 • ♦ . { I iMAtjn6tt ^re- I • :' { V ' • • I I ' * ' ; Ml i lii| • : ! I I t I * ' ij — r—^---- l! 'l2»4|»ttWiotJ ■ ' « i I ‘ :CI» ; l» I » ill ■ \ ar jc f • «• ^jctycpn •’ ,. MllHS£tS»e?li ■f !i ' !ti I. it*i .1 • i j ** II . •} III ■“ ! I •'&>6Pg<auM i ’ 7^“'unu- 'fc'T.V.l I. ! J\ Kl 'I W r • • •I M I - .f* "t ll It I ( ; I 1 1 1 » < • . 'h ■III1 1 1r\• {j •1 • 4 • * ..5ih > I i \ * . { I ; N • I r I \ .< !- t • • .' . ^ k \ * - — --------^ ^ ^ ---------- , I , - - •* • . it . *»• *ft, • • • • t ( • • < • ••• » • ■ -■ - • . ^' . . . r % ••. » . • .» t «• *' • */• . • *-i •♦ • 9" •!«•-.. • • *.*»*k *«~ * » * • • • i* •• ; • %•— n-*.f IIIIIIIU t ^k •••• •••••- •• • • • • <* • ••• •• • • • ;•* * •• • • • • # • • • • m 0 9 ■ % • • ' J • -•>' I iiiiiiiiiii liiiMIriiiiiiiiiniiiittiii 9*9 9 1 • f Bl« « I r ' I 4 S J c I I .• •• • • % • • ^ , . *. . . •. ^ -..I-. M #. I ^ •* . •#• *' i V . ’• • »■■••• ». • • • • • t ►•V* *•%«''**• «*^*% 0-^ ——4 — 0 •«/.««% r . lAm . 0“» ..». .■ f • • • .^v* •**• t • «.-•. • . * • .„sJ • • •* >* • -^* ... «* .a .*«> ■ 1«» Ji» , . w ^ .• ^ . - ... * ; . ^ • •• y • > •. , >• — • • 1* • vr r^j. * » • ^ --i-Vv.' •: r'^ :*:..«u'Z-'\. yT.r"s ♦j'- .:.- *» « w V— * .^T. 4. .^• -r*2: ••*■-'• *'— • «••* .'..^fc-‘ •: • - . T • • • •r* ••• » «. ■%. M • t i# •* *‘ * •■'•^ -'T* •** - f**i ; . M«iiiifp9pfrappBiiiiaiia5iSSSSS&SSri^^'^''^."^*^ ... ... ■ .-A ••••-»•.» ^.Vll/’ ' ' • ‘:.W ''- ■ii'-J-i}i'% i ^ - * V ^'* ri> • • ■.I' 'V • ?j». • I »• •. ••• «.■ .4 * J»**»'*»^ •• • i * *•-- V- • : i-.:! - -M •••- .-V. ^ ^<1 ,••••• V • • •* ••£*••' *fc ^ f • • . • * • . •* k*« • . 4 ^ • - ^ . • ••• • • ••• «••••••—■ *•• • *' - I . •• • ■• -- • •'• • j^.•.,j------ -------• - jcrzs •=*';k;":'vi:-^T-.t;^':;*;. '-.r- ? • 4..»»« .* • -•• • *• •»••• • • • -* • nwvjt; .* ■- •f 'NsS* • , %'•*»J»z^ 4*rx«r 44 . «* •V^ *^i5"*i ‘r #*• I «v*.*».%.% . • t < ••* * •*.*• » - .. . V *• ••» .»••••. • « -1»\ •- «i - I .. • * • • • • • • • •i • • •• •• ♦• • ■ -W9 it?fUmu r -.'. .* :•;. l":. .■:■ »i • . • • . :;l‘: • ilft * • 2t •. .• ' • . • . W •:• • • •. • •'. .. .. ►•• • • • — MW ■•• ». —> -»•»« - J » » • •. *■ < • ' . « • • •iliiilHi I- itiiti •«# ^ «»• •• • -• ••••• r * .*' ,44 •*»' . •• '• • ' • - •«••»••• •-— •• • •. •• - ■,:^■".WA.:'.,v»r: r•..- .v ..•; .;vl.’-v.; .v'v',;.‘.'.'. ’.. •. ^ :■• - ■ • ■- . . V A •• • • • •• .................................. *'• , ^ - . •. . % ^ i ‘ ..>^»> ».*•• .............1' . r.-*^ j .....•’■ '♦’••V-;:''-''./.- -. ’*’. . T.' * .'’•J" ?'"A'^.i-'.. - '.V • *• .-V. y.'V-'- 'ii ••••••.• ■•• ='«• i.'i* .• . • . • ______ . . -—............ . , . : . 4C-. . Tf ft.« •..<■• -.>. » J,..' . .*• a.-*’' ..................a*-^**./ • V . • >v *'.*.■ I ** • •% ^ f •' -•*<■»• - . t —* .♦ < •• ^ -♦ . « • • •• •• %• • » • >*-4* ••• .^. # •• ■■ ■.......— i, - '...rr ' ■r~'r “f i *»-** •-•?*-• -• ^ ' r.Z"r^— ^ 4-M * V *» V• < . -. ^ *rj - • A.. . •*• .- . —'f -•f»SV*-S #-'»• CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN ZONING FILE NO. 1621 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 2/22/91 TO:Terry 6 Jonell Johnson 1045 Linden Lane Mound, MN 5S364 COPIES TO: TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance mm mm mm mm tm ^m mm i DATE OF MEETING: 2/19/91 VOTE: 6 For 0 Against Planning CosBiasion reco —ends the following Tabled for reasons noted below VOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Planning Commission advised applicants to submit a revised proposal excluding any additions in the 0-75* zone which are not above the existing house footprint, and to minimize hardcover to the greatest extent possible. Applicants' next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the March 18th meeting is March 8, 1991. If '^ou desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. Mm i .1 w Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members Prom: Date: Michael P. Gaffronr Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator February 13, 1991 Subject: #1621 Terry and Jonell Johnson - 1045 Linden Lane — Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR**1B, Single family lakeshore residential, 1 acre, sewered Application - Requesting hardcover and lakeshore setback variances for proposed structural additions and driveway relocation. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Preferred Site Plan and Building Plans (Plan A) Alternate Sice Plan and Building Plans (Plan B) Staff Sketch, Lot Coverage/Driveway Concept Hardcover Calculations, Existing & Proposed Average Setback Sketch Pertinent Pacts - 1.Applicants propose the following additions to the existing residence: a. b. Add second story over entire house. Extend room additions toward lake (two proposals submitted). c.Construct a two-stall attached garage with living space above. 2.A portion of the second story addition and all of the extension towards the lake will be located in the 0-75' setback zone. A portion of the existing house and all of the existing 8’ wide deck is in the 0-“5' zone. Setback information for this property is summarized below: /• f i f 1 \ Zoning File #1621 February 13, 1991 Page 2 Lot area = 27,350 =* 0.63 acres Setbacks: Existing Proposed Required Variance N. Side S. Side Lake HS:70* 13* 26' Deck:61* Street E. Corner Avg. Lkshr. Stbk. 200* 36* No Encroachment 13* 10.5’ (A) : 56' (B) : 61* 170* 10.0' * 10* 10* 75* 35* 10* * (A) 19' (B) 14* * See Item 4 below 3.Existing lot coverage by structures is 8.6%. In either proposed Plans A or B, lot coverage will be less than 13%, meeting City requirements. 4.Because this property is on a concave shoreline, the average lakeshore setback works favorably for the proposed additions. Also, because the Prass property to the immediate south has no existing residence, staff estimated the probable location of that future house meeting the 75* l*J^®®bore setback, and that location yielded no need for an average setback variance for Johnson. 5. Hardcover on the property is summarized in the following table: HARDCOVER SUMMARY Zone Zone Area Existing HC Proposed HC Allowed 0-75' 75-250* 11,220 996 s.f./8.9%(A) 904 s.f./8.1% (B) 784 s.f./7.0% 0 s.f./0% I 13,470 2983 s.f./22.1%5235 s.f./38.9%3368 s.f./25% 250-500*2,660 2024 S.f./76.1%1640 s.f./61.7%798 \ s.f./30% ' Entire Lot 27,350 600:S.f./21.9%(A) 7779 s.f./28.4%4166 s.f./15.2% i f Please refer to Exhibits H-4, H-5 and H-6 regarding the breakdown between structural and non-structural hardcover. Planning Commission and applicant are advised that on February 11, 1991, the City Council unanimously adopted a ication of policy regarding hardcover. The Council's intent is to no longer consider rock/plastic landscape ar«;as in the 0-75' zone as "tradeable" hardcover in the 0-75' Zoning File #1621 February 13, 1991 Page 3 zone. Their intent is that all such hardcover be eliminated, and not considered during variance reviews. It is not clear whether Council also intends that other 0-75' non-structural items (concrete or block patios, sidewalks, etc.) are to be included in this policy. 6. A summary of the requested variances: a. Lakeshore setback variance of 19' (Plan A). b. Lakeshore setback variance or 14' (Plan B). c. Hardcover variances in 0-75', 75'250', and 250-500' zones. Discussion The applicants purchased this property last fall, and are proposing major renovation and additions to the existing one- story house. Also, they propose to construct an attached garage, necessitating construction of a new driveway to the residence. A.Setbacks Because a portion of the existing residence is in the 0-75' zone, any additions upward or lakeward from the existing house cannot be allowed unless a setback variance is granted. The proposed garage addition and the existing house both meet street and side setback requirements. Because there is no residence on the Prass property, staff estimated the possible future location for that house. The concavity of the shoreline and the location of the house to the north, indicate that Johnson's proposed additions could be behind a future average setback line. The neighboring residence to the north was built in 1983, replacing a house formerly in the 0-75' zone. This residence was constructed with an angled wall to meet the 75' lakeshore setback requirement. To the south, the Prass residence, when it is built, will have to meet the minimum 75' setback requirement. Immediately south of Prass, a new residence constructed in 1989 was required to meet the 75' setback requirement. The only difference between Johnson's proposal and those projects is that Johnson apparently intends to build on the existing structure rather than removing it and starting over. (Applicant should verify this). i Zoning File #1621 February 13, 1991 Page 4 B.Hardcover Although applicant did ^ot submit a specific driveway proposal, he had discussed wxt.h staff the intent for a single driveway and backup apron to seive the proposed two-stall attached garage. Staff has sketched and determined the area driveway which could feasibly serve the property. (See Exhibit G). Both Planning Commission and Council in the last few years have discussed the issue of structural hardcover versus non- structural hardcover. While the current Code definition of hardcover does not differentiate between structural and non- structural hardcover, the City Council clearly is heading in the direction that non-structural hardcover in the 0-75' zone is not a reasonable trade-off for increasing structural hardcover in that zone. While both of applicants proposals yield a slight hardcover decrease in the 0-75* zone, both proposals would result in a significant increase in the 75-250* zone. Overall, even if the existing detached garage and its apron are removed, it appears questionable whether the driveway could be narrowed and other surface-functional hardcover decreased to yield no net increase in hardcover on the entire property. There is absolutely no way to meet the Code hardcover allowances if an attached garage is proposed. Lot area is approximately 0.63 acre in a 1.0 acre zone. C. Option A vs. Option B Regarding the two options presented, applicant initially proposed Plan A in discussions with staff. After those discussions, applicant chose to submit a plan which showed room additions extending no further lakeward than the existing 8* wide upper level deck in the 0-75' zone. If Planning Commission cannot accept Plan A, applicant would request consideration of Plan B. Staff Recomaendatii If Planning Commission feels that there is sufficient hardship and justification to allow Plan A or Plan B, a recommendation for approval would be appropriate. If Planning Commission feels that the structural additions in the 0-75* zone are too extensive, or that the hardcover increase in one or more zones is unacceptable. Planning Commission's options are to recommend denial or to table the request. If the application is tabled in order to allow the applicant to revise his proposal. Planning Commission should give applicant specific direction as to what magnitude of additions and hardcover percentages might be acceptable under specific conditions. Isv Lt r CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) JJ. ”3 'c* Cl ry OF oRCi^} PROPERTY LOCATION u r.rrtrr- - .... V'wv**/ Site Address i/\y Mn Ti •/ *CAi V X t.*LJ t y vc: v» X f u»#VV rLtri.-* L. I %7i ji 7C Vt V».f u / ixoperty Identification Number (P.I.D.) C Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. tii.UL.Xf 'mi f t ttif*ltl\ fVU •X*.V»V^ 1 »•’» f’fVii u/)i T i'"yy Ql/rKio tLhlJ / APPLICANT Name ~7^r »-v/ a 1o h v // "7c I if i, ^r^ Address;/L>-/.r~ _ _ Phone (home) _ _ _ Phone (worltT-'^Tc City; ' ^p: OWNER (if different than applicant) N2une Phone (home) \ ■Mci Phone (work) 1/5^ Address:City;Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) ^J^o^notJ^lso own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY ^ Present Zoning District ^ / /*> Present Use of Property Residential 1 Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ /r> r, 0J\) Describe request in detail; VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) Other Aar/i' HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: j / * DESCRIPTION OF UHUSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: r, < ■*/ <fV L/ih,- At bv Lm\\^ a¥ LaL» REQOIRm SDBMI^i^ - - < ^i,ju<axuu^ Completed Application Form1. 2. \JU^ 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained wi;h property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8*j"xll'' for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are propose^ (provide one ccpy 8H'’xll’*). Slcetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8Ji”xll'’). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above infontitlon has not been included* APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses Incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to thebest of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date /-or-9/ ONNBRS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investxga- tion and verification of this reqi^est. Applicant must hava^ll submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all schedule review sMetings of the Planning Cowmission and Council* If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 6 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ^ v:> ■**1 * V “■-«i 5f» :5 ( '9) LAKE 01 J4 r *••......... .r;-/r*i* if b • - • W • • • . .••' »•.. »•• ••• •.---------^ • •• '• # ■ 1 •• • •* ^ ^ ft • • «1 • • ♦ < » • *4 _ ( *3) - / * i^i ••• '9 <5 f7 •• *:t (20) • V:;. >> ( 19) (-a) Hi »(5d)r;‘i • ^»c r-'»-4f L?cn Lk LINCEN LA (2H C5) ikC 4-A-tS sT^ry ^gyMy^A ' .M)) ^ /. i’i) ;.v /• 21: » )/ •. •‘ ( /ft / I ,**-ft / / "•"A / / \ ir) t)\ Ml I :« v-4^ r<f !51 (2)\"! “ • : (23) *^ v4 iii '• ^^i57''iS ' 'il J' >5| 111 c i* lii< S Hart •^41 ’*^ in r' t« ^ CAM. %n <3? ra 9 'CsizA?* :n ^(27} ' *(29) -nr *94 N twii «I •j« ’I »»1 iS n J .-I •» t55 V'J -^ iT:i ^ ^ "............... 12 f ( 64) f <5 I- :a^-a^€4_CT¥* -. .j»- »5 ^ (T5) ^«5jr (60) a ir s i»*) TJ Til^i ru 3* 1 MTT^ § ssw Cls ■I m ft *1U o <9 » *1 I ft H* 9l •<ae r« H- yK m ft•« 2f; H« H* « M ft • Itn c » Mc *w ;33 *< » 0 t| *1 <1 a c F "I ft y 0• n »- c ai 9 •1o •< ft 9T a • K- >1 fi* ft C£.1 •n X < 9 m 9 Hr. c If. 9on ftf a • 7 •< ft»*• m|h ft o < <9 K» ft •< *8 ? It C M fto< . _ ft a ii 7 ft ft • M * « ►- M o oo » ft» ft M. o ft aac ftso MrtH«aaHarrf** a79ian:rai»o f- H^ttrtaftoiaaft'gf-^ a A o ft • o A T|ft»M o« Ot* Awai^ M9 OAOA S < rvc eitf%n>Mftrt»rt a 7rtft7000rt ftftgt a* 99 *<7A« OO rtrr • Alt fta* Md.077 AAOrtft9 AA O n 7 7 A f^f-OAA *<f-CZ 9 ft A A A O O aZM79nA^ 9AK*O0O«AAftft rti a«0 ft ^ A 7 0 »-«* tr s* X ^ — f-r»»ft (aft 9M- A00f-*AAC7C9 n H* A A A A A O ftaftOA«AO f1A7AA»17f«tiO A 9 *1 f- 9 Of* O f- a*9 f*»*< A C A 9 ft A f*^ 9A7 99A£< II 9 ft A - A A ^ a A A K An A ft ft f«* **• %2a •D? ft ►*• O f- *2 ^ »«* ft 9 ft lO•< w• A f« 9 ft a a < o f* A A A H 7 9 »-*o ft •— w *t n A A 7 OOftAAUA* nc f—9A r- o 9 ft a a ft •— c f. n ft 7 A 9 na*< o r* o c. 9 9 w O ft A f*- C Kl O < f* o a** 9 A «0 9 »*• «0 ft It O 9 A 9 ft 7 OAAC. *Q7A A*9aftft( A aAAAft9*-* o f% aatn^Of- f4AA9 ftt-f-7r*A( f- O A A f- A A on 9 n *9 A WO cnaraA *t O O f» *t 3 -* C 9 9 O ft 0 ft A O« r* n f- 9 > 9 -» T 7 0 A *1 O X A 5" -.7p *Cc ft.1•• ^ •f ft < ft n •• 0 • O " C n A i A n 9 O A — »t Ka o *- H r f*» 9 A A »* «0 ft JT 9 AA A A cr ft ft ►*. A *0 9 a ft O A A ft! ft t-« >r O O • ft? s.» A no i A 9 ►*• m ft n •• 7 r. f. A O f- ft U **» — X r* A 9 rt *- r. 9^793 O’ ft 9 A iKotE C - .>O 3 «r.r*• f-fw 9 0 «•• r 0 » r 0 r^.Ao?ft 1 G An•£ 9 tr 1 ^ r. 1 1 rt —r-»> t • • —*■••**♦*-* » •♦ *‘ —-.......................— ... .. ., •••- »« imM • ^ •• »»»«»••«« • * »•• ■•*■ ■ «.«».•« «. . • * . «» . *^C«« mm ^ m • ^mmm • ••*•*«*••• « « •♦••• *-w« ^ —r -^-— » - »*• • i. ‘S' ill' * »< • • ' ” % i : .1 r ' itl'v. i.i . mm- » «• > ms •« i2l3( • . • \ . .► # • •';ii^»l 4 * A ••V; ■)X«.l w S» •.til •t • • 14. •< :■»>•• • • • •• • • • t Z?• •• • . ^• • • • • • • • »>f • «»• • i4'V ,' .r.' • •• •• *••• •( • • ^ • • •• • •• «4i •• ' >1 *■ .« ,*. ;^%*- S !•.;• .* • . • « .• * •• • w >•#•• -<• «.|* • . • . ^ »*^l * aiV** •«•* •■ • mmmmrn4 i« • • •<••• ■ ••• • ••« •••K«4| t ' ,•«»••*«» • ^ w Widk. rnmm^ • • «. (■ ^ i>«*. . V ■•••’•Ml *••• JL-•«*. . • -• k • • ^ • -^ > • • •» •••• m-m •* .«•• «•»*•••. •• » •••» •• • •• •• m * •■• •••••••■••••^ ••-■ i • • • • • •«• • »«<»» . •« • • '••«•• • # •• • ., (|A)6ST^ gUgs^ATloM PM AS • I 1 • J ‘r; ;•. ► , ^----------------g — ■»-ig « ,v .^P^*^**-***»—— • ................. r---- ^ ''‘ffiifiHf!|Ws| lil It ii. t ifc.i f\^.' f I •] )t • t 1.11 M .. I 0 > :i;i.l .♦l.l n *• ««*. I*I :r-:i • I ~raa.z :::;rr -*»***« __-t-____1^ __ _____ •*« ^1 ------------------------ .- t * t“I„i—, ,, ^2_.^----^ ■*-»^ rf i j-| ' - ' ■ ' "* ^V*f • . ;•••. :.. ;•>•,. » .If ij^ * • • * 1 \ ti t fJ ’V' • 4-it '-• ' ?• If J|j|i: 1 ! « i .V- • • -----------< - -• ♦• • • • «• • ^ n&fpli ij: i.-r .•'{Jf 3l ' .’! »'!}r?s i *• •I,'j; ;\‘-l tif.i» k 1 ■ |||i ;''J Mi: ;:• « • •;|iil-i^’ 'ii-'• If* ! • »• ••• • ^ .sh..IJJ- I;!i:'. . /‘^ii ♦* • • •> #• • ■ f • -^.' ... .«.«• .. .«,.. a. »*l ; ■ ii '• ■ ........... • .••-.• «..I • • «■■ ■ ■ I ■ «•.••.•... • ‘I* •-♦• • • ............................................. «- —• ..•.... ... .... •• ■• .............I— -.. ... , ...^ .^.... ..— ________ • * • > • •' ■■ 4m*» ^ '•P«» ««•••...#•. . • IHL -...................................................- ..............-.-^..•w-,.,■«•• • • . I «. X. i. av^ATT r',A J A ** • ••.■.•,. • • * * ••«1 ► • f, ,t .1• 1'• • # • •.>h • U « «♦*^«. . • • * ► • • #ILL '•‘. V : . [.. • .r>' • * 1 ■ # • ,^- 9 yT|• V - v" EEHin 1 IS fMSVO'^i C^v^€. (loe^-n) izs^wp- gU€v^AT toi^/JOT- TO SC4^ ^ t .J^s P4AA3 '.'8 1=1;L f ^ • •• • j r... ■ ■—■—^•F“>1 E4 ■•V. L A«%> ' ; • *' •[* ' •* ^ j.’ .i; ■ 1\.' i: 11: . • I 11 h' • #1621 *,!>. IE ^JBS/AT' IOM 'PlAAi B> : i •- .jj.i ^ .1 ♦ : jii w IV. i . I f : n. :• • • •«« »■ * « •■^arsT * •*•.« .» :m •-• • ^ •. ^ *•»» * ^ ♦ . ♦ •i!5 r '■'13?#M !^,r< j^' 4 !•: , -v <|}i(^ , i> M i:■;■■■’ '3 ini' rSiS ;.:. I V •;*. . • #•• • ^0 i »•* # % •• A ..^.. .^T-i.-. xxiz-i_ik. i *1 trr ’• i"' • i : £Vw"*r.- T":: j •:r-rr.~-:„ , • • ;■ i-;•:?* ’, % :’••■-- • ............. ........v^yg:t:tte;Siw^»ir4 ^ ' i »JUr ----!_:—^----i_j:--------------------------•:cr:rrr:t^t-=a:r4KI -? • •Sj" ^-----------•yimn«i ^rl; ‘ • • ,'* ■Mii- ■'4^-;* * M-V!' ,ii ii.i:!i.'fr ; . tJ .;•*• ^'iU! •• *• •:; 3 , ^ i-'v' tJ j- «««tmmr ___r** * • ................^1 • • • *» ••• 4 Vi • I % I », t t.:"* Ml t‘j?'.vt U 14! i i,): if ’ r ! J.viiJ , :■ ■ '-'‘f f. •* ‘ '• *4* * » t : i-l i » • *1 •€• i ' i‘'i',:i- l» * I: ii^' . iS* -.v! ,!ll'i. \< . >1 • . |!^f.’^i.'|^ •• r :»■ )'.,. ii? ,. ‘ • «•*«•••• (iV* •>••*••* I • • i I.:', !;;'l;” *;: I :■! •••^‘!• f *'*“■** • • • - - - •-.1. 1^ * ••..• - .will I I ■■■■■>> ^ -4 -i;*. ^ . •» ‘ ....................................... i ..........................._____ •* ...............................-.4.14 ,1-------------------------------. ____________ , . ..... -"^'•••-7 . !- • .............-.............................. ...... ^ ....................^ • •f—--»4* I • f* ......... ......................: ^.... _1 ,T • *; , --........-..j.-.. ,.■ ,. , .•.;!«•.•• nir-rJ-i ’ ’ • '. j'] I’- :•. .I?M ii! • ' i-»• f f<*. •): .1 r I. * fMAi S •1 •Au: ::"i-H •- •’ ! v‘i; •}{ I*;?,*!, j. HARDCOVE?. CALCULATIC:; 'n’ORKSHEET SETBACK IONS: (ciF.CLS ONc) ^/Si) ?Sa2iC' Existi :i5 Ha :^dc:v £.^ in Zone 1! /\ •HovSi b 1 y X _ -/92 W*.- «...<% B . r . LENGTH V.-.0TH X S.F.i HARDCCVEi^ CALCULATICN KORKSMEEl SETBACK 2CNE: (CISCLE CNa) 0-/5' Existing Hap .dcove?. m Zone H . •• .' ' . >1. ■■■■ « fs •House Zl*. V H* wARAGE <- r. nfTivsvitL'RIVEWAY ^ UStIGTH /f.f # % , X VflDTH % 9 • X •• X • • X V s #% # V . X • !'3t2. / S.r, /7?. 2 A »•o • • ~/92 «• I I I /299.i f ' 9 J, — / ^ * ‘ ^ w • iT • •• ^ % T % C* C M» \/ I I I nso S.F. « « A S.F, D., S idewalk _ l/JjtKK _ X 5 • r • :< 5Z „ . —•} i r . £. Patio/ 1}£CK X y. y • I < V#«S • r • TI€S F. Landscape aseas uiiDERLAlfl 3Y •fO It O.s »3.S <i . c SHEETING » X C5 ^ ^ ^M • • 1 9S •X1• xs S _S»Fi <L Si )c a* s 2T. S* = _ - £.F. Pdt/« - Orvceo* v/*r*w«»X /3S s..«. t c*. /’A' i*/*^-** Total Hafoccver i.n Zc.te Total F?.o?s =’.ty A-fiEA in Zone 29/J.3 s.r. [Ai n. •iTo s.p. 1 .1 1 1J • «1 i>1 nn •2’£3ii_ 13] fi.v7o_ X100 t —T 2J./5- % V F*r Ml*'.' : ; t tv- .4 ■..••* tt ■ Vi't T€AiU^'C^ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK 2CMS; (CIRCLE ONS) Existing Hardcover in Zone '•4 f1 ^ 'J'- » A n 0 ^ ^ ^ •ff X •; >' 1 t: ... S.F. * t LENGTH WIDTH •• • X cs #S • r • • X mmm • • s.F. • •• • • X • S.F. • X m »• * S.F. Zt.S / 2^.3 ss yj2.yS.F. ca*^€i~ r ^;t7*V?WAY • y ------ fS5?S.F. Y a • • S.F. •* « Y S.F. X ------s •S.F. V ts • S • r. E. Patio/ D eck • Y «• • • • S.F. • . *••• 1 ^*n^r AO P •Y =Sir# AREAS UNCERLAIM Y * s.F. 5 Y PLASTIC SHEETING Y • S.F. 44TCC 2r i Y O . S /2. ^S.F. CiMu. G, Other »• !• ^X -------------=2^?.S.F. Total Harccovcr in Zone Total PrcpcRty Area in Zone « n z^co Z^ZS.? 5.F. 2 CC0 s.F. An aL T^OZi.E X IQO - _7^*/o H~'~l ItjRV. . ■« 1^ — ■ --------- > f\ t'*‘ ^;c/srjM6^ : ff^/Dt?0<y^fferD s S.^%> ViAvKu^t^^:iJfi£^nci •29>2>c.-t.' b,s 4 ?LArn^ (9 li-T. ‘ ^rj.t'-^c. on^r.'^ fo^tJC* i/n^(ca. fV^cv^- •■'!=' /-Otttr O A ‘r^ A Pla^ nz./‘i'Z- /V> 2 jO o-«- ^ytZ^ ^S>0 2.7 ^_ 8W/^P<5<><T" !i / s *74,VC. d>/V )\'U T lO-L. f^Ot*\ y '5.-^PS»/>VX Vil /i.*r '7%'Z^&>>2- /^u3 C.<S>t/U4^^ O?^ Hs.... — *i Y 'i.o / 2-a»/2^ B>s:2~-7S e Sz.S*2 . ... .. ..... . .. ^s.-c.78 <4 -S' //,2Z^O S^.'^8.1 */. ' • 7.0 % M \ If i L <|.. ViJ|1A4AMAJRJu/-Jtikil j«f^.fA^CwiSa/i ) K"> ...../^ti ^S.'7 “?7/. iff-jimn >^)>./e> S73f©P /JQt^ , 1/ja-lKZ ' „ ^:^ir> ....... ^ V - . /^,. .•.■•vya,(r' TO /J. ^AvJfc> 4T-T . y C^o » 2.9 '^i'- zHo 2?.^ ___ 2!^ s-C.2,.°! ^/c |«»». • ••__t?yi.Mn AJ<S. ___________ 1^ ___Sr^f(fT^ 'O |2.1J W /■"'i^.i" liiJ <0 C* / /^eT7 UJ<ruU2 ________________________________________ _.|2-3»o ._ ” 7'/ /o ............. 2^^ 8>3 “22-/ / yk jc^l%r<t:^..<> ............. ______ . . / jUkte i ^ 1 A. ■ - ^ ■^... ^ ..‘w^. liiiifiiii I ] : '/i-'" M,f *^-/ V/ 1 / rTW-\ j /.... ^4 #*«• . •« #4 imrn*4 J* # /<»4«/ • « * #'•■ • * . 'V'** 4 A.# /4^t/27/t'AT7oAJ Tos Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Froflis Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: September 16, 1992 Subject: #1755 Leonard Niska, 2304 Shadywood Road - Variances/CUP Application: Request (now after-the-fact) for variances and "through lot CUP to construct a 140 s.f. storage shed. Zoning District: LR-IC, 1/2 acre. Variances Required: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Side Street Setback Front (Co.Rd.l9) Rear (Through Lot) Hardcover (500-1000*) Lot Coverage (609+140) 2409 Structure-to-Structure Proposed 5' 20* 24* 41.1% 25.8% Allowed/ Required 15* 30* 30* 35% 15%* Code Section 10.25 Subd.6(B) 10.02, 10.42 10.22, 10.56 10.03 Subd.14(C) 10.03 Subd.12 *Shed may not fall within interpretation of the "garage" structure allowed as an exception to Subd. 14(C). Note: Lot area is 0.055 acre (1/20 acre). List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - AppXlegations (Variance/CUP) Plat Propertv Owners List Survey Letter of Request Hardcover Calculations Neighbor Acknowledgment Construction Plans Chronology Please review the chronology provided by Jeanne Mabusth, Exhibit I. Briefly, the applicant initially proposed to his existing garage. After the survey work was completed, it was clear that the existing garage was located only partially within the property, partially on the neighl^ring property, and partially on City right-of-way. Applicant revised his application to include removal of the garage and construction of the shed. Applicant was advised of the need for building permits to construct the shed, as well as the need for demolition permit to remove the existing garage. r" Zoning File #1755 September 16r 1992 Page 2 Applicant then proceeded to remove the garage without obtaining a demolition permit, and constructed the shed without a building permit. Please review his letter of request. Issues to Address 1.Is there some other more appropriate location for the shed than the constructed location? 2.Is there sufficient hardship/justification for granting the setback variances and hardcover variances for the shed? 3.Does this shed fall into the definition of a "garage" that would be allowed under the lot coverage ordinance? (Recall that up to 1,500 s.f. lot coverage is allowed for any property for the house and garage.) 4.Given that gravel around the old garage will be removed leaving a gravel parking area, is there any additional hardcover that could be removed? 5.Knowing that a tag is being issued to the applicant for doing work without permits after being told those permits were necessary, is there any reason to not require afte*- "the-fact fees for the building and demolition permits as well *xs the zoning application? 6.The Building Department notes that a 10'xl4' shed is subject to building code requirements to be attached to the ground in a manner acceptable to the Building Inspector. Discussion Only the applicant can explain his reasons for proceeding without the necessary approvals. The issue before Planning Commission is whether the proposed shed is in an appropriate location, or if there is a better location, or if no shed should be allowed. Certainly, removal of the non- conforming garage could be considered an improvement to the property and to the neighborhood. The location of the new shed and its incongruity with the code requirements for placement of such structures begs the question of finding a better location. Such location may not exist on the property, which is only about 65' deep and averaging 45' wide. Few smaller developed building sites exist in the City. Zoning File #1755 September 16, 1992 Page 3 If the 140 s.f. building is allowed to remain on the property, it will need to meet all building code requirements, which would include ground attachment acceptable to the Building Inspector.^ Also, if the structure remains on the property, does the Planning Commission wish to consider aesthetic issues associated with its location, i.e. screening or at least structural/color compatibility with the existing house? These might be factors that could reduce the visual impact of the structure due to its location. Requested Action 1. Make recommendation as to granting setback, hardcover and lot coverage variances. 2. Recommend any actions to mitigate visual impact of the structure if it is allowed to remain. 3. Make recommendation regarding after-the-fact penalty fees. CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) JL ^ 1^ ^ if oo PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address ^HAOVl^JoaP / /*7-//7-23 Vy 007/ Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.)/7-*//7~A3 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. r,c r..:>r.un Date Property Acquired /tVY (nionth/year) rcrj/'r I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. ^"-OijOCCOO Present use of property: V residential _ _ _other (sped —i 75i Zoning District: UZ.’^LC, _ _ _ _ _ _ rccrK ji 175.00 APPLICANT Name X</ Phone (home) V*7/~r/v>j j /*()5;^ Phone (worlc) ^ 2t/~ 7/joCa — » i:rriTn /uw ! Address: S}ft(^jDy6.aa>o ^ CXtw. lArTA _ Zip: ^39_/ • T ^ OWNER (if different than applicant;Phone (home) Name Phone (worlc) Address:City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail; VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage i Setbaclc:Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIPA>BSCRIPTI0N OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements- - - -- (attach additional sheets If necessary) REQUIRED SUBHITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete: 1. 2. Completed Application Form _Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. _Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. _Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%''xll'' for reproduction). 5. _ _^Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll"). 6. S)cetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8*s"xll'*). 7. _^As an addendum to this applicationr please attach a separate list of 8. any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICAHT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Date ONNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of_ this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month.* Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Plannin g Ccsmtlssion and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ' CITY OF ORONu - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION Vjj)0PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Smajo Wlkj Roacj Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) /"7—//*7 OO 7/ V/ Oo?/ Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT , Name A ^ 'SO t K Phone (home) ^7 / “- Phone (worJc) ^ 7 / ^ ^ Address -2.^Citv Zip OffNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) Phone Address Citv Zip Date Prooertv Acauired ^*977 (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - COI^TIONAL USE PERMITS - \y $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration I Grading and filling ~ designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTB Et APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 75.00 $300.00 $300.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultamt fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obta this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A>>603 Governme Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if lane alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE A flORKING COPY (11* X 17” OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOO ITS OR ITS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required oi requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the Information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signatur Date g^//v-A7 ONNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have ar authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building 6 Zoninc Office of this change prior to the meeting. m CITY OF ORONO - BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Total Fee: $Date Received: Date Approved: Entered By: ‘Permit #: ar.T. information MUST BE SUBMITTED IN FULL BEFORE PLAN REVIEW WILL BE STARTED (See Check-off List Enclosed) THE APPLICANT IS: (circle one) ^^‘-^^OWNEg^r CONTRACTOR JOB SITE ADDRESS;ZIP: (work )Q3./-7/64 ________________ PHONE; (home) MAILING ADDRESSs 0^0/7 ClTY:^V/{yZ^______ ZIP; SS'^^------ NAME OF OWNER £.OajAJ^A/fSJSA CONTRACTOR;PHONE !iAZLING ADDRESS:CITY ZIP: STATE LICENSE: # ARCHITECT/ENGINEER MAILING ADDRESS:_ NAME: PHONE: CITY:ZIP: REGISTRATION :TPE of WORK: New V Demo V Addition Remodel/Alteration Accessory Structure ^ Move^ Renovate_ _ _ Land Alteration_«I TORIES:SQ. FEET OF EACH FLOOR: ;0« OF BEDROOMS:GARAGE STALLS: ATT.DET. 'STIMATED CONSTRUCTION VALUATION (excluding land) : $ A rCoo :rdinances and codes of the City and with the State Buxlding Code; that I :nderstand this is not a permit and work is not uo start wxthout a permxt; ana hat the work will be in accordance with the approved plan. PPLICANT * S DATE: t vr-r* * _ L. .*1^ J r K P>m Jo.SJ .<‘d <•11 1 ^ 1 m ••s3 4*Zi-.a r»A • 5 7?•=5?5 (r75 (21)a L/%(M)(to)C»)(4) (!•) /.• /(~*^{;« y HP y V If V V !0 10 y 19 A g P liJ >g g ,'.V It li"la"'*3 a i*a<12 n»II*»^g (171 CI4«)(40)(41)(42)(It)0 /•< >9 .*•/ iJS.V ►••••• Hf •v^ 10 LIVINGSTON AVE 4S * i«» («M uu iO id^u ib iCW^J&n 2&r TT fc^jOWt SOn Ip «2 •2 s2 4?1-iC I* y.. > • • • • • • n 01 ir 01 10 “ 0( i-t 73 Of t“ Of 5“45 5> • ktJ? (4«)2 (4?)(4S)(44)2 O)1 A 1 X (70),2 (t»)(U)(141)(tt)(t4)(tl)(ti)•w 1 (U) ••r V y V ✓.to •r oror 10 y y IP ^ •' 19 ••/ 10 y y JL ^io /.y ••/! «l ^ ^ . ^ 9 “1?•C li * .0 2 t\«c n?M? > 2 •1^1^ X ^ -ir X It".72 If iC Jtor 0( 22“ Of 21- ¥1 Of 24“ Of 2i“^4 (U)(«)2 (S7)5 (ti)(9)(71)(71)(71)(74)0 (7S)X (7t)(77)(7t)2 (7i)(60)f*= ►1//.►f •r 1 • • • • •✓.••/ff J y Y J3t-IP Hf y y y 10 y 10 10 10 y IP 10 1 1 f 1 LYRIC AVE Trrsn * -r * 2 <€$> V ' V ./it* - « MMBik 'rfiB .1 .UTferr^k-^ Hi .d>uVril MM DftTt os/ei/n 9 BATCH 002 PMO AOOR ONNEH NAME TAXOAVCR NMC/AOfW TROT AOOR OMCR NMC TAHMVIR NAHii^ADOR PROR AOOR TAXRAVIR NMC/AOOR PROP AOOR ONNiR NAME TAXPAYtR NAMI/AOeR OWCR NAHi TAXPAYER NAIC/AOOR PROP AOOR OltCR NAME TAXPAYER • NAME/AOOR : n- i I SO X7>117-2S AS 0001 02190 BAYVZEN PL C T ROOD A L 0 R( CLAIR A LYNN R( 2210 RENNOOO NAY NAYZATA m 5SS91 SO 17-117-25 AS 002S . OSAIA LXV1N6ST0N AVE ROSEMARY P BURMASTER ROSEMARY P BURNASTER SAIA LXVIN65TQN AVE MAYZATA HN 55S91 SO 17-117-2S AA 0025 02205 BAYVIEN PL CLEMENT P BIRCH JR ET AL CLEMENT F BIRCH JR AND BARBARA J SIPPRELL-BIRCH 2205 BAYVIEN PL NAYZATA Ml 55591 SB 17-117-2S AA COAT 02S1A OLIVE AVE LOUISE B OAY LOUISE B OAY 2S1A OLIVE AVE NAYZATA m 55S91 « SB 17-11/-2S AA 0071 02S0A SHAOYNOOO RO LEONARD 0 IQSKA LEONARD 0 NISKA 2S0A SHAOYNOOO RO NAYZATA MN 55591 HEM«PIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY ONNERS LIST •t 9 ♦ • *0 • 't ,1 ’f • ••1 if **' • d « ( I 2 '' t SO 17-117-2S AA 007A 02S2A SHAOYNOOO RO vj R J HAEFNER A C F HAEFNER • RICHARD J/COLLEEN F HAEFNER ‘ 252A SHAOYNOOO RO ^ NAYZATA HN 55591 t • *•. , • t i!I • « ■ T SO 17-117-2S AS 0002 0229A ■ SHAOYNOOO RD AON OF VETS AFFAIRS A N OTTEN AMP FRANZEN 229A SHAOYNOOO RD NAYZATA HN 55591 SO 17>117-2S AS OOAO 05A05 LIVINGSTON AVE FRED A FARR FREO A FARR 2A27 BANTAS PT LA NAYZATA Ml 55591 SO 17-117-25 AA 0065 02520 OLIVE AVE J T JACOBSON A L 0 JACOBSON J T JACOBSON A L D JACOBSON 2520 OLIVE AVE NAYZATA Ml 55S91 38 17-117-2S AA 0060 02S06 OLIVE AVE GLADYS NINOINGSTAO GLADYS NIND1N6STAD 2506 OLIVE AVE NAYZATA Ml 55591 SO 17-117-25 AA'0072 02S0O SHAOYNOOO RO PHYLLIS HENDERSON PATRICK BRICKLEY 2SOO SHAOYNOOO ROAD NAYZATA HN 55391 SO 17-117-23 AA 0079 02SA1 SHAOYNOOO RD N R GROETSCH A C J GROETSCH LOUISE A 6ANGELH0FF 2SA1 SHAOYNOOO RO NAYZATA HN 55391 ' t: tEPORT NO. PAGE PZ4SM01 $ t: 5S 17-117-23 « 0022 03422 LIVINGSTON AVE R A SERNA ADA SERNA RAHON A SERNA 3422 LIVINGSTON AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 ■ • I , ■ f* 1 so 17-117-2S AS 0061 OOOSB ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO FRED A FARR FREO A FARR 1A301 BRANOBURY NALK NTKA Ml 55SA5 •• r<f' r •* * SB 17-117-2S AA 0066 02S1B OLIVE AVE HIRAN B JACOBSON HIRAH B JACOBSON 2310 OLIVE AVE NAYZATA HN 55S91 : i • 30 17-117-23 44 0069 02300 OLIVE AVE MARGARET A NOOO MARGARET A NOOO 2300 OLIVE AVE •. NAYZATA HN 55391 > • ^ s •.T ■ > \ I \ i ‘ j’-? !• » LiT iV i ♦ SB 17-117-2S AA DOTS 02S1A SHAOYNOOO RO E A KU6LIN ET AL N/L EST EDNIN A MABEL KUGLIN 2S1A SHAOYNOOO ROAD . NAYZATA Ml 55S91 • • / i i , • .5 > • •*: /• 4 » ! • SO 17-117-2S AA'OOai 02S0A SHAOYNOOO RD LEONARD 0 NISKA LEONARD 0 NISKA 2S0A SHAOYNOOO RD ' ' NAYZATA HN 55391 •! m ; 4 • •r i i •i... -I- :'r'l f t* i I* * . f •i .l r • i',:' I ' •1 *t! r i ‘ • #• A*'. ! * 1 '■ A ' J. '..'iV-.. l'-•*< i • ' i •••/ • • • •w-^ '/•!?* i- r J i Leonard Niska 2304 Shadywood Road Wayzata, MN 55391 CfiYCF ORCNO i'QdEdO^1 September 11, 1392 City Council City of Orono Crystal Bay, MN SEP 1 5 1992 To the Council: Last May, I began my attempts to get a building permit to remove my existing garage and build a replacement. The garage I wanted to replace was sitting on the road right-a-way and part on my neighbor's property. It was also built without any foundation and being held up only because it was leaning against a tree. The city office informed me that I would need a survey and probably a variance. Coffin and Gronberg took three weeks to do the survey. They finshed the survey on the date of the June deadline date for the July meeting. This survey showed lot line problems that caused problems with my initial plans. This item was tabled at the July meeting because of the lot line problem. I had a two week business trip from June 27 to July 1**. Because the survey was so slow and my trip came at an inopportune time, I had no time to change anything before the July meeting. I looked into moving the lot lines, but this was too expensive and too much of a hassle. I decided to put up just a shed on the other side of the house. I was unable to get the survey drawing updated to make the July deadline for the August meeting. Again the Survey company took three weeks to do a 30-minute job. I work full time and take college classes parttime. I took the summer off from my classes so I could get the shed built and mv house cleaned up. I am planning to sell my house and wanted to clean it up a little. I needed the storage to put some things from the house. My classes begin again at the end of September. 1 was finally able to get the finalized plan in to the city to make the August deadline for the September meeting. If I would have waited until after September 21 to start the shed, I would have a much more difficult time to get done before starting class and before winter. The shed is a Menards building. The city has a copy of the building plans. The shed is setting on a couple inches of crushed limestone.(3/4's and smaller) The building is moveable. (If it has to be moved for setback variance.) I decided to go ahead and build and complete the permit paper work as the city's schedule permitted. Si^erely, Leonard 0. Niska irininr iiBiimi fim IIIii>m < iiitHi III iiy .. I mill ^tlAlll • % \ •; r.'; HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET _ _ __ SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE'ONE) 0-75' 75-250'' 250-500' (TOO-IOO^ Existing Hardcover in Zone A. ■ House 20:^/ LENGTH S'. 3" B. Garage _ jKf /»/<WAry c. D riveviay Itj 7. S % ► «r* • • totru D.. Sidewalk iL- X /y. 2. E. Patio/ D eck • •• F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY ■ . . - X PLASTIC ------------- SHEETING c/rr xr^fsr G. Other ___. X 22. y WIDTH 2./ 7. C Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone • •• • 53 V3 0 S.F. S.F. S.F. roTAL ( mm /€ ys 57 •• • S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F S.F. S • F • COUjJ^ Sf cout^rea Ai Ifst ftivcf fr /J A^or 4Lt. 4 ^ (20 4/0 7* ^7 fy/S //AK'OCO/f/i^ ro r4 c ; ^2o ? S.F. /Z 'o2 • 4- B 2 y X 100 - 290Y S.F. 9/.^ B % A* 4ti'*oiAAt. C fAAAS-fj S S"S Sa.X’r. 4AA/>fAry) tC^^AUfC') - zoo " " C/a A Art) “ ^90 SA.^r. iZofA/9o -./sj “79^7--------- = y/. /s * •*• • ••• Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form [pri/t name(sH-^^j„ ^ ^ have reviewed the property located _ Application No. I 7 5^ « •AP also referred to as Land Use I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am / t ^ declare approval or disapproval of the property or use (are) not aske ritv Council that I (we) am (are) aware ofbut merely to confirm for the City council tnat ^ „,-o-ieet or use the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or requires Council approval. Date Property Owner Date I (we)(print address][print name(s)] 1. • Thi;,ns for the proposed improvement or proposed use of thehave reviewed the plans for tne prop . referred to as Land Use property located at _ ___ _ _ _ _ _—- - --— Application No. _ _ _. I (we) understand that in executing this (are) not as)ced am (a«) aware of ^Sri:rro^verent°;VaTs^°na\\Vt^tL^;ro;o^^ neighbor;s p^ect or use requires Council approval. ^ ^ it ‘IX -I ^ <•» f j O .1 •4 Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have youi“co^ent“ to "ht Bu^ri^g'’* xon^^roffice ^^leasrirda^ys prior to the scheduled meeting date. 1 JLI t. * i MENARDS i.rx* t • ft IrM L ^.* . f OW(P ICO^l^Z m 1. GENERAL Prior to beginning construction, the area selected for the shed location must be leveled and cleared of obstructions. Z. INVENTORY Separate all lumber, hardware, etc. into individual stacks of like items. 3. FRAME PREPARATION Unfold each frame, setting aside two frames to be used as end walls. From l"x4” Pine boards, cut Gusset plates 6" long.20 for a 10' building. 24 for a 12' building or 28 for a 14' building. Apply gusset plates on each side of the top and bottom fold locations. Frames to be used as end walls require only one gusset plate at top and bottom on the side opposite of the metal plates. Use four 8d nails on each gusset plate. See Figure 1. iFt^uftfe i: x*i/a»; 6id« Wan Fi M«a I”x4 Traatad x"m4’* Bottom Fraaa at bottaai laid i ISKI EZ BUILD SHED FRAME i TO:Michael P. Gaffronr Asst. Planning i Zoning Administrator FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:September 16^ 19^2 ¥'■SUBJECT: #1755 Leonard Niskar 2304 Shad>i«ood Road - Chronology of Events 6/26/92 Niska filed a variance application to reconstruct detached garage loca<-ed in street yard. Upon receipt of survey dated 6/26/92, we discovered that major portions of garage are located within City right-of-way and in adjacent private property. Miska was unable to revise plan for the July meeting because of out of town business commitments. 8/15/92 Niska filed an amended proposal and submitted a revised site plan locating a detached accessory structure within the street yard. Staff republished legal notice as conditional use permit as property is a through lot. Proposed location of detached structure would require multiple setback variances. 8/31/92+The Building Staff noted the new accessory structure had been installed on Niska's property. Mabusth contacted Niska to advise him of the obvious violation and the impact on his current land use application. In addition, Niska was advised to submit a written addendum that may provide some clarification as to his action. The Building Staff was advised to issue a citation. cc: Lyle Oman •> • % : ..t f • •* V** ?V i *<• . 'r-•* * **• • • * • *' * »iC 4St7 (Ml) UNIFORM CITATION NO. .* . : 392-041966 tTATf OF MINNItOTA COUNTY O'* NCNNIFtM OlSTfItCT COUMT . - *. , •••: Th# iMuing officof 'uiAt^U^ lh« *^rton**lT namAd b#low commn.^ tha olfanta dtscrtbad In violation or lha taction Indlcalad. * ' - • —. - •• •• •• •• • .M 1 omvfRt LICf NSt NUMiCR 1 STATE 1 % .••-• •■»• * » a 1 NAMELAST. FMST. MOOtCAIAlOCN *.• 1 S K"A L •' •0 N A r?0 D.• • • • ♦ • ••• •-• • • ■ 1 AOoncsE A ctrv 2.3 o 5 H_A o V uj !o o ^19 0 w A N *2.A T A V ••• • STATE ZiRCOOf 1 fWlAl s s 3 f 1 1 OATf OF BIRTH EYES HEIGHT 1 WE!QMT 1 SEX I uo.1 OAV 1 YEAR 1 1 M V. tT- 'F. • • V « . • a • •• a* a«#a*a*a • —................>.♦. •••..« • VIOLAnON INFOnyATlON ;r «• ••-* ' • • • • V. :*W.. .•‘•..i.v • W t *. t •»«4 «a a • « iin GATE OF OfFENSfi ■ time 1 METER NUMBER a •a i':; ok 1 1 9 2 /Z 0 0 *« - 1 -a • 1 VEHtai LICENSE PLATE STATE j YEAR 1 MAKE 1 MODEL ! 1 1 ■ color LOCATION S CJTY ♦ • 1 A >D 5 H A A '1 U)O o cfii o A JQ 01Rl O mIo 1^A)s 3 L 1 STATUTE OR OROOUNCE NO.OCSCRimON il G_M D l •• (d,o 1 « fi.ia.6^u o * • V r-[q_ ias.0 k e £_i?m 1 T f .*•- .a ••F : a •• • • • #■.1 ««•,ComCoatl CTonc 1|/«TIVfTY : 11 SaatAoevI ;T. M 0 a .S □s?v,"o?r,r DMoo. □^nTcTT'*'" □a:s,'Sj“!. 1 1 # 1 BADGE NUMBER j ORl NUMBER 1 ...--- .*j-M N 0 1 Z 1'l-s c o 1 •< • < a • • ' «Rd « WBffMni may 6# I§au0d for your srroBt, If o warrant la laauad, a ponalty of $30.00 will bo addad to Iho flno» • A fVJ 1 %A Cu A 5 ■1 N r O cla .c .s 0 A u A R.1 A AJ de p u \ I C p i A-T-f O a L>r e U (r 1-K a I o (>tT P A o VJ 1 t-<u ^a ; • V.*.* • I ■ *■^ ^ • ••. •• COURT CODY • DO NOT WRITE ON REVERSE oo\ MfiC M GlTYofORONO Miuiiri|MU Offices Post Office Bok 66 Cr}^ B^jTi MlnncsoU 5S32J-0066 July 14, 1992 Mr. Leonard Niska 2304 Shadywood Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Dear Mr. Niska: I have received a copy of your recent survey drafted by Mark Gronberg. In light of the new information, I would advise you to schedule a meeting with me at your earliest convenience so that we may decide what your best approach will be in relocating a garage on your property. It may be that you would attempt a lot line rearrangement with an adjacent property owner or proceed with a new location for the garage on your property. In any event, please contact my office at your earliest convenience so that we may decide on how you wish to proceed with the original variance application filed with the City. Sincerely, Jeanne h. Mabusth ^ Building 6 Zoning Administrator JAM/ch Enc. TCLEiniONE - 473-73S7 • FAX • 4734)510 hi 1 - i5-_ n-_ .CjD|'‘^ .. _oI._ Jihit .L^ ¥ f?P(pOS6i9 <9 <+cl3 - .......ITl.<^__J\)ei^K^ rrU^Ify^- ,-T::H^__^So^i-rH ^ UUJWi- -b>. _ar>H<_.S\Q^ Pid<jI A<^e<- K» Put-4:So --OH _-Fs<Z- , H€-..^tfee __Cf^ fiKfb l-fMfe'' -^4^ U»*<- ■jaL£test_ 10<;. - JhS,. ft-. __ KK<l U> W-/v S-US'-v T^(/Jk j^9diwt'-.'fH:/5 [-jiCU _._ p • •II ! f . 4ll --Xl-istv^) ..— i 1III.1.WI - —-............ •* « . I^V # ^ _________ ” ‘ j f \r _____ ^ ^ -------------i------------------- [i ^ .. — - ------------ -------- ----------------- ^ i .r i’r ... 1 . : :j ^---------iUJ. 3 0 1892 r:r_: L j.___^n MiMlJfti P * \ Tos Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Date: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator September 16, 1992 Subject: #1761 Mark Hunsley, 3464 Eastlake Street Variance (After-the-Fact) - Public Hearing Application: Request for after-the-fact variance to construct storage shed on Outlot B, Bayside Beach. Variances Requested: 1. Accessory structure on property with no principal structure. (Section 10.03, Subd. 9 (A)) 2.Setback from side street lot line: 5.9 feet proposed, 50 feet required (using LR-IA standard, although no specific standards are given for out lots...} List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Letter of Request Letter of Agreement from Association Members Original Plat Resolution Covenants/Restrictions on Outlot Use Copy of Plat Stubbs Bay Sewer Plans - Lift Station Easement In April 1992 it came to the attention of the Building Department that a 12' x 16' storage shed had been constructed near the right-of-way and without permits. Mr. Huns ley was advised of the need for a permit and potential problems with the shed location. Late in June he was further advised to make the appropriate variance application, which is now before you. Based on the survey, the shed is located within the outlot and 5.9 feet from the street property line, 48 feet from the west lot line, and 28 feet from the north lot line. While the shed is fairly near the graywater mound sewage treatment system, municipal sewer will soon make that system unnecessary, hence the setback from it is of little consequence. The shed encroaches 4.1' into a 10' drainage and utility easement along the lot line, however, its location has not and will not affect the sewer project. ! \ \ 'i Zoning File #1761 September 16, 1992 Page 2 Status of Outlet Outlet B was created for the specific purpose of providing access and a site for the graywater mound system to serve the residences at 3424, 3444 and 3464 Eastlake Street. The main driveway serving all three residences is partially within the outlet. Mo specific references to construction of accessory buildings was placed in either the approval resolution for the plat nor within the covenants regarding the outlet. While the outlet appears to be owned by Dean and Nancy Monge at 3444, the covenants require that the owners of all three benefitted lots control the outlet as tenants in common. In allowing this subdivision to occur in 1981 under relaxed standards to the f’oning area requirement of the two acre zone, the City clearly intended that the outlet serve not only as a private access road but for sewage system purposes. This lot could not be used for a principal residence. Discussion Please review the letter of request. Section 10.03, Subd. 9 (A), which states "no accessory building or structure shall be constructed on any lot prior to the time of construction of the principal building to which it is accessory", was intended to avoid situations where there is no tenant on the property to control the use of an accessory structure. Clearly, that is not the case with the Hunsley situation, since the three abutting property owners all control the outlot. It would therefore seem reasonable, in this case, to grant a variance to allow the accessory structure at some location on the outlot which will have little visual impact and not conflict with utilities, easements, etc. The code does not give specific setbacks for structures on outlots. If Outlot B is treated as the street yard of a lakeshore lot, the setback from the street for an accessory storage building would be 50*. A location 50' from the street would place the structure in the middle of the outlot where it would be highly visible. As constructed, it is hidden from view by fencing and a large willow tree. Also be advised that the property owners have granted to the City an easement for the lift station to be contained within the outlot, as part of the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project. This easement was granted to the City at no cost, and is located at the southeast corner of the property. Hardcover would appear to be a non—issue. While each of the three building lots is at or slightly above the hardevoer limits as a result of past approvals, the outlot hardcover including driveway and shed appears to be minimal, approximately 5%. i 4 5 I • f Zoning File #1761 September 16, 1992 Page 3 Issues to Address 1. Should the shed be allowed within this outlot? 2. Is it located where it has little visual imprct, or is there a better location on the outlot for the shed? 3.Has the applicant provided sufficient justification for construction without the required permits so as to not be required to pay after~the—fact fees for the building permit and zoning application? Re 1. tested Action Make recommendation as to granting of setback and hardcover variances, and shed location.^ 2.Make recommendation regarding placement of an accessory structure on the property without a principal structure. ’4» 'i r .V < •• iXI:: 'AU G ^ IS?? -I • • CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPL0 Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address East Lake Street_ _ _ _ _ _ Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) Bayside addition_sub. # Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. - - -t-• Date Property Acquired August 1983 (month/year) I (do)(^XiH£lO also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: X residential X other(specify) Outlot Zoning District: Residential (?) j CW OF QROm 135&m 0^3/i APPLICANT Name Mark A. Kunsley Phone (home) 47S-4Q'56 Phone (worJc) 541-7247 Address:3464 East Lake St. city: mm m mm mm ^m mm mm ^m mm mm mm mm m • mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm ^ mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm ^ m mm mm m OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)_ Zip:55556 Name Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 500*00 Describe request in details utility shed on outlot (see attached lette VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore ^ Other (specify) Utility shed on outlot HARDSHIP/DBSCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements*?_ _ _ _ Needed storage of equipment to maintain property/outlot. I'lO storage ' available on prioiary lots. No restriction was placed conce^nin/?: sheds (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following informati o n must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for yonr application to be considered completes 1. 2. Completed Application Form _ _^Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3._-Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). I •/. 4. _[__Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll" for reproduction). 5. ___Topographic survey (existing and propos ■* elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide ? copy 8^”xll''). 6. _S)cetches or plans of floor & elevation /itves (provide 1 copy 8%"xll"). 7. _^As an addendum to this application^ please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. __Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above Infomation has not been Included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all Information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Icnow .edge. Applicant's Signature Date OfiNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature ^ Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Ccaad.sslon and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ..u t V J 3) .^(41) a (91 US 9 / / U7) ■5?5J1 vkt :"» .»•* 33a J—-" V 73a 21 *69 t?S !6f i;S % Wrf :3i73 /- s i (M) l<if 111) (U) "I r ^ k 4 in) H 1 7 JiM) n - Httt m» U2ja CTTsrRTK** ^ UN 17 ^ P (41) 5 i>! J (■JO) n n ** ar^ 141) "as ’ V* f "•• nt)i* r ^ 9 4* M r» SI fc i»y > J (TJ) 7 j twi 9 / i : • T»; i Cl iwn \ \ \ '5^*’ / '.37/ InsijfVJlj ^ I 'b H C ■■ ; g t ; ifv« \ f m » » mw9 r i.....vf^Trvv*;-Al> 1% ^ \ aTT3 * I* tl. ■ r r r r r RUN DATE OVOA/92 MTCN 005 PROO AOOR ONNCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR 0»MER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/^OOR BROP AOOR 0»MER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR • . ■ < . PROP AOOR OHNER NAtC TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR r r M 05-117-25 15 0012 05A20 BAYSIOE RO RAN ANDERSON ROBERT F A NENOY 5 ANDERSON 5A20 BAYSIOE RD LONG LAKE IM 55556 5B 05-117-25 15 0021 0005B ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO V H LARSai ETAL VINCENT H LARSON 1025 COLFAX AVE S MPLS MN 55605 50 05-117-25 15 0045 05444 EASTLAKE ST 0 A M0N6E ANA MONGE DEAN A A NANCY A MONGE 5444 EAST LAKE ST S LONG LAKE MN 555S*> f • SB 05-117-25 15 0046 00050 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO 0 A MONGE ANA MONGE DEAN A A NANCY A MONGE 5444 E LAKE ST S < LONG LAKE fW 55556 1' ii i' TOTAL BATCH 005 00012 r :i HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OlOIERS LIST 1 t SB 05-117-25 15 0015 05440 BAYSIOE RD T M 2 _3MER AMT ZIESMER TODD M A MARIE T ZIES»IER 3440 BAYSIOE RO L«IG LAKE m 55556 ' 58 05-117-25 15 0050 05400 BAYSIOE RO DAS ESTERS DANIEL A SANDRA ESTERS ^ 5400 BAYSIOE RO LONG LAKE rtl 55556 58 05-117-25 15 0044 05424 EASTLAKE ST T E RAOKE AHA RADKE THOMAS E A MARGARET A RAOKE 5424 EASTLAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55556 50 05-117-25 14 0059 00540 TONKA AVE KENNETH M BOLLUH BRAD 0 PETERSON 540 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE »t4 55556 REPORT NO. P14S5401 PAGE 15 50 05-117-25 15 0014 05470 BAYSIOE RO MATTHEH E HANLEY HATTIIEN E HANLEY 5470 BAYSIOE RD LONG LAKE m 55556 ,7<.i :. ' I -t ' 58 05-117-25 15 0042 05464 EASTLAKE ST MAN HUNSLEY NARK A HUNSLEY 5464 E LAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55556 ■ • i 58 05-117-25 15 0045 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO MATTHEH E MANLEY MATTHEH E MANLEY 5470 BAYSIOE RO LONG LAKE MN 55556 *• ; I < ^ V. W., .? ■ « « .4' ' 58 05-117-25 14 0052 05590 BAYSIOE RO ROOT H A BARBARA HUBER ET ROBERT A BARBARA HUBER 5590 BAYSIOE RO LONG LAKE MN 55556 AL f i. «• I < • l' 9 . % *i t i 1 • < i i' I iV:- 'i« •. * 4 f i 4. % 4l ♦‘ i ■ a I \*6.h.- .t-- • i t •/ • » l.i f ■r- • ;*•t s- : ?• ; ^ i J ■ J 1 t •4 n V.'m ■m •i IT July 30, 1992 'AUG 3 1852 Dear Planning Commission and Council Members, The purpose of this letter is to seek permission to locate a utility storage shed on the joint outlot shared by the three properties at 3464, 3424 and 3444 East Lake Street. The utility shed would be 12' x 16', cedar siding and properly shingled. It would be located on ground without a foundation or poured slab. No other improvements to the shed or surrounding area are requested or planned. The location was surveyed by Coffin & Gronberg, Inc. to determine the exact easement locations and was reviewed with John Gerh«rdson of Orono Public Works during our on site discussions on construction easements for the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project. When this property was subdivided in 1981, no restrictions were placed on this property preventing such a utility storage shed as per the attached covenants and property documents. The shed will be used to store riding lawnmower, lawnmower, snowblowers, garden tools, wheelbarrows, etc. used to maintain these grounds. The planned location off County Road 84, is not near any other buildings or residence, is shielded from traffic by trees and a privacy fence. All three owners are in agreement and support of this request. The city is planning to request an easement to construct a lift station for the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project on one corner of this outlot. They must have determined this location offers minimal disruption and has acceptable separation to prevent problems with noise or smell. A shed has far less negative effect.. Sincerely, Mark A. Hunsley 1 <r -:- ^• ‘•1 ¥ % y\ Vi N A 4 We are in total support and agreement with the placing of a utility storage shed on this outlot as per the variance request* We agree with the need to have storage space to store the equipment used to maintain this outlot and the adjacent primary lots. The location selected is virtually out of sight and has no negative impact on any of the surrounding properties. It is our desire to maintain these properties to a high standard. Proper equipment and a place to store it is essential to accomplish this goal. / Tom and Marg^ Radke .. .•. .. i/-.v - V, . -9^ jf^ • •*'.’v^ -'.'.Vm'* ^ • . ' '• ‘:4' ■- V 7 * '*1 - *" • ••’‘*'* yJm^ • • • • - • • ^ a;;:* n:.ri .«•• . % . • • f . •• JW * T • •*. ’. «. r.- m iV-’.. - . t.,:l-iin^v*T £Tt?«c ► - cv r» •1*-i'. .A PESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF .'• DAYS IDE DEAC)»•-V WHEREAS, chti C^of Orctiw *" >< tnunicipal co.'porobXc organizud und oxxstin<j unuor thi.* lawij of tho Stjce of MinnctfO mmm *4» >f U 1-W4 «• 7- rb WHEREAS, the City Co*incil of the City of Orono has Adopi subdivision regulations for ci.o orderly, ocononjc and safe dsveldplM^ of land within the City; and .1 r» WHEREAS, tho city Councx.l has considered the applXeiijE a subdivision plat by James McClcary huruinafter referred to .Ad' subdivider: and * >4• «.vv« ,.-p ' ^ ji ^ >-V WHEREAS, on June 27, 1980, the City of Orono togethAr^Wjt tne subdivider entered into an agreement in which one of the agr upon conditions granteu the following variancea to the standard the LK'IA zoning district, such variances are valid through Juc 1990; •A.' V4^ . - •. iC:r -/-i.r -•n-'-« SSTr^^M i-I i 1)Lot Area; The LR-lA ,:on acres or 87,120 sf u: »r jt. anted a:, •'.'..•rag*: i:;: r.•.:• iC.: 1<". cj; the ^ 1 1 I • • • ^ « 'ji.strict rv;UA;r*i7i 2 _ 1..^ .-Tir ‘ acre or . suteivi.ier iia> ; 2i i\\, 4-.Lot .-...: : ; *•** *• • ’.* * •*.'•, qrafitv : .i rniniinun Jtreut ijet^uCK: : a 00 . '■/• j ^ .*1 c* L La c .*; • •’ I or. •• #•«••• A i • 1 * ^ ft • • w • • • • ft • . •: ros a .. •.. : i . :l : -as :i;« t • A. ‘V ,, X 4 ' . ^ 00^, • ft • #5;. 'T-h -A*- - # ■. ? • “S *' hu ...-i/% .'irn;;.,* requires a* .i. . ill: uJt-r.ju; t-ic Ji:wtiviGcr.*™^.'rr.- -'t .sp#.**5***» i/; a». . •-» *,•• •. • ♦ • • « *1 a i :o jt i. jtr.;ctures; • • i*Ji****ir^»i .si't ha c )c 0 • was f;ra:;tud a 20 f»''#r :.» : i;uf •••. . 4) Sidcyuivi St;tLacv.: T?u* LK-i/. aor.;;u: .ustrut rcqulresyrvl?^?"?^^^ a 20 toot sctba'.’.< lo subaiviJer wa;i %irunrca t V;!IEHCA3, Liitj a<ib*iivi«:c: :;a.. the il! ..-.• vr^**—K.V.J-* * -4 C'jul.jtions o:tl;i.; Cl!• • ; 0 r.. • ; •..: i: 1)D<.e icat ion on t ::*•pi.it o:or .1 ir.kio.j easements. 2)Led ie.it ion or.tn%*P 1 a ?cr k • -• *• pe:. 11 : .’•oan • ft* • 4 » «iA^:i 1 . * 'J ■.'*.*• • • • . t' 3)Dedication to the C11 y or kin open It. S a •/ ; .'I •. ;u I reinents^of .a •.«,■. l 1 • ,,\ •• . : •*. •' m " ^ ’ •* ». k ;• ^ ^ -a -A , ••* * a <• •« :*'• i.r 11 icy ■•• • * • ■.•■• '■-'.•••••? ...»•■• ^ • 1 over OutloL A, a subi,iandard lot lucated in the ' vm...:• LR-IA ,:oni.nq district to be combineu with a • buildable parcel ot land witliin 2,COO :*.ec, said •' "h~> l.•ascmenc. limits the? u:ic lil the riiuirian outloc to Lhc construction ot oi*.o sinult.* lan-.ilv rcsiili?nrlai •s.v-w-.—• docK only it a rcsiileneo e;>ii«tu <>n tne builJable lot described abovi;. • , -*5“ - '• i- r-. T .. .•**. *t•. • ...k . .<r^.aw ^-."T V - - V. • . 1 V y -. > r .v'r-A...r .. »...«* - .11'-.- ' ■ • • \ V "'•r mam f-47<rf>^»^.*-,-.t — ' • .* •'..'-W’-^ r^'.^ * - :«• ,.,*v;.,'», .. % . ....... • ' ^ !-. • v->. . i.-. • .' ' • •• * ■ •../>*.• /: T* *^‘.‘* * ‘ . V. ... . .. : .................................................................. . In": n= sSown oncne plot as Outlot'srSJiro^tlot'';!?!*"^^?,■" the follovinrj inprove-TJonts: ^ v.ontain aj A separate sand/r^euna bor.-n tor the treat- irSlocri ‘"-JiviJual lots 1, 2 and *” s-.i.’.'irs'? ''■'’^ttuctod toJv.r.G Ua.1 t..ri;e resi.der.ces; j juiqlc, n.-w euro cut will be created on Kaatlako Street. Concurrent with the creation of this shared cof^ns area, the suhdividcr has created a non mJni^ privsite sewaqc troat.’nent system ease- * mont ov.’r anu acro-ss Cuclot Q for the mutual - benefit of Lots 1. 2 and 3. Block I inclSdiio ' a doclaracicn of ccrtiin - - - ^ •* 1,'r- » •>>/» :. V. i i.r' . >v - .*v- -d4K«W<a a declaration of co^tiin 0^ and"e?eerw°'.'-“.—‘OvewntJ^j w*. .y ...... i . j.r.r.!?': i:m d:i*» ►»^in , ^reva* k^- r w: .'’ f^^rof noTo.^'^’' -=•■vAm^m: rnmn m ■> •■ ••^W4^X1 WC»JVi/L#V w 4J County approves the plat or n,w^iDt: nE.\CI{, unty, Minnesota; subject to t.no followir..; condit.ons: . . . ' ••v>nr<NOW, THEREFIFE BE IT RESOLVED tnac t.ne citv rin.inr.il iw*.- proper-y^ill^r^K”” described issCjnc^ o' ”h “'■- ***•-■"* sealed prior to theIssuance o. the rirat PuilJinM per.mit. ... • V.-* . • *'.Vf/** ••. • • •• • JW^ in Outlot^p"^'*''" *'‘’*' "'' ■" ;r;-.vwa/ .located • » f ... ^ *1 . ..*.-w»*^ r*'-f .a •*. ♦« V .*.-**n.s. •" •>*’. , V . »r» .» y 14 u;• iM; f.inc IV. f..^c :;jf lin?, .my «;/ic ot the .. n-. •t ••••. in.Uvi.iual ;:ew...i.. .u.p.v.... i a: utJ.:.'.:n Outlot u '’“i'-ire.J lit.iu.iur Js ur t.ho la^u ..44./c.i hul.iiriij ' • .4 • 4 I-. Ho*.** W»' ... . ., - «... . rUdk.-e r P' *-7 »iW«i • ^ - • -• • I 4) The mlnimun floor level of any buildlnu on tJtia ^ ”2.5 feet Msras reHu??ed i; Ordinance and th^ ^ and^f proposed structuresand additional improvenonts must meet the 75* setback from the Lakeshoru. The aforesaid plat ihall be filea bv t*'e Citv or Orono with the Hennepin Countv Uecordcr*J Resolution anti oxecuted copies o£ the*' additional documents noted above. Adopted by the Cif council o£ the city of Orono, wibl • ^ 19ol. '’^''‘'S^SSOSSBSBSSSSSmk •%-rrewr: rr-* r^-_-~-e-,a- J2^. ^-f t. mm^ e?j5 .J-.!e> • ‘ ^ > r > f ;^ry<^ S>*Pt7>V • «> f; f- «► tl *^7*’ •!---- »• e .. ^ , ^•- • -.*''J?2 : *M •♦ M iNr'-V^ ^ 4 kiilijm u. Van .‘.‘ost, .Mayor c. ^ #V.W .• '•• *->;• ^ WiVi4r*i;»a»sL^d> :>;':a:3Sr-2 e . v ••.'^•* *•';.*. •:.a r-;!V^:xV**lA«i^?fc-?T5 •• ■-•••:y • .^i:•.•7.. fe • fr. ^ *». •.••«*.*i V^ ..*. f ' ■.<•• • • e «» . e«S»»« «.• ' _ •■ 4 " .. • - *ir^ •. % - . * • •. « *•'•• . is* ** ‘ .'ll***"’^» « .• .• »*^ • . •• . • - r, \ ♦W.V .;.-v-v >. / •. ^ . •. * -< ' *•' • * *i*^ -3 -1 * V*'I ^ ^ *'-4“ *■ e^’ **"'\^ w'liPr^ ^ ■''^l • ♦ 4_ # ^'^•-* '•’■^:?'; j<S‘i': "? -r > ;:: ' ■h"‘\''^ 7 . “ >-*^i‘ ^ » ^ V »■ L ‘ ‘* ^e *' S ’ - ' ' » « • * . A « *> J -r*‘J>» _ _»‘ -.1 _fv ' MsmvirjgNiM ----------- ------------------1* ... . -*\^;»'Vv^A/^^•ir'** »*><• • *, vOV i; !;*i{*?>'-^i f ^>‘• •:•• •- a ^-r'\~-}'^i^H:f-^:. ^:'.:::";^: v‘'■Tv;'.*•::•>*’-'"'Ti HH ••: •• .•! .\»\*'.^. A ♦ ^. *.. . • ^ * .T* :,* ■'/ , . • •• ••,.. *• , > ’■ t'ri-'^'-i' - • t'^i^* *r* ► w " ••*. . ’•»•'•••,* *i ^** . . '•••• '’* ^ • •* "•*rr ••'j.»‘ *'. * • . •< • f-*.. •. i -'.r—• ; •« ,*v.*- . «^•. •- • • • • • ^ • . •♦ * • ••»*.» -• - • •5‘ '*%•••.♦ .V. . .• V ‘ ••» .*%. • ’ v:'•• * .. . /V.* -1 , \ OECLXRATXOJf OF COVENANTS FOR MAINTENANCE OP SAMB'v^^^^;?? . . '•* . —.r ; '. .*.*• ’ I • • * .. . ■ • . r «« * ^ .. ..., ■% • -*^ XNOir ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS t -5: WHEREAS r Jane* MeCleary and ' ~ ■ ■'• hvsband and wife, (hereinafter "the subdivider") are the tee owim that certain parcel of real estate located in the City of Orone.x.4 of Hennepin. State of .Minnesota, legally described as follows* ® • — - .p . . V j ^ » L —~according to the plat of chat na.Tte on file and oz record xn tha o of the County Recorder, in and tor Hennepin County; and r>*« ^ *V/ 1 \ .. •» [•'si ' .V -*v;create a non-.^WHEREAS, the Subdividera now desire to_ _ __ _ _ _ exclusive private sewage treat.nent ays ten easenent over and.acrow Outlet B. (hereinafter "tha easenent^'] 3, Block 1. _________________ for the r.utual 'benefit of Lots .>* *v ..* • . NOW, THE.REFORE, in addition to any easenenta createdv' any other Declaration of Covenants. Conditions. Restrictions-and Easenents. the Subdividera do by this Declaration for themselves,.' their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby create a non*exclttsly< easement for sewage treatment purposes over and across ths easenei as described above for the mutual benefit of l^ts 1. 2 and-'3* -BlOi (hereinafter •benefited lots") - •-•■’ ; ana .••.i'1.0 WHEREAS, the Subdividers are the sole owner of'OutloE and all the benefited lots; and • > WHEREAS, the Subdividera intend that Cutlot B wlll^be conveyed to the owners of the benefited lots as tenants in comson subject to this Declaration: . /„: NSW. THEREFORE, the above owners, t.helr heirs, asalgi successors (hereinafter referred to as owners or owner). hereb^^._ v.covenant. and agree as foUows* :- .. •.. r ' 1. The-owners of aach benefited lot ahall.eonstin»ct*«miag^3^^ Outlet B a separate Graywator Mound System in the tespective mate locations shown on the diagram attached hereto as Exhloit A jk^ js» • -m., t *».V .V* V P.'*,2. Each lot owner shall bo responsible for the cost* ,7v.-*7.ji .V and operation.* • 5_* • - > rv-*- tT* • •• • . ■ -‘t' '*''** -. V •••’ V'J Ein¥iSdt.HV m , ^ ^ .*v, .• • r V •>. V. • • M*.... • : r-- ^ •..'•••-.r* . *.*< ••• •*• •''■“? , .‘.V.. • *■ *.'•' A*w ^ *-'■.• .* -•.. .• *. ..‘v.. •* *. • ^ ^ m * • ^ ^ * A. A 1 Creywatar MouAd P«rinittod on thaMound Systoma that might damagu thu syatemo. Prohibited " actlvltlas Include, but are not limited to the following: • Vehicular traffic, Digging or excavating except in connecticn with construction, maintenance and repair*.'vKv Gardening, Construction and naintenance of improvem’ente^S or buildings of any kind. ; ^;*r**-r*« . ..*. . S' •. « • .’".V ‘ ««*. owners may use Oatlot B for and other purpbaea^ not prohibited by or inconsiatent with this Declaration or loSil*-'- county. State or Federal law. nation or iocai^,._^. a) b) c) d) e) Parking. wm • i- 'J’ - v* VI S9G i f .'.v'.cai w-/ f.'.-i ■ .m « 5. No improvements may bo constructed or made on Ou^O B without t.na consent of all of the owners. The coats of construct maintenance and repair of any improvement will be paid 1/3 bv th* o Of each of the benefited lota. ^ ^ iS oavahle on owner's share of such coats shall be due'a^^ on the date such costs for construction, mainton.inca or reoi P*'“" “■• “"'“I- rend.T^^;S !n i«oSSt® share of such costa shall bear interest afe oavSent percent per annum from such duo date to the date^l may oring action, on behalf of the non-defeSltli * defaulting Owner's share of ouch costs whieb^ **“®' ‘*1?'^ shall be entitled to recover such reasonebic ^‘^® *^y allow, tcgather with all nenMaxycosts and disbursements incurred in connection t.herowlth. • * •• A No Owner may exempt himself from the liatillw^£^ rAll/AT- itaas ws« __________ ^ ^ f Wig T ^ a ■ e . f • , -i Z* OwncT may exempt himself from the llaLillw*^^^^ herein iaii U nirnJJJnrrS^alJ'o/JSp^Ijr ’rnrcJJriaS,* as provided for herein, it is agreed by all parties that the CltV^ ^s%"?.rej e“f "i“Se5%rr ws --^.^era.>.,^ f’ * _ _ a wfc vwwsi W» snail become a lien upon each Lot at the proportion provided torjgis r^-S^ '1 ► • -.' /'j *1;' a '* * ’ -'i• .‘J ^ _____ r F . .1 - *. I . \ •• v' • — . -i* — * -*•••.<•* *-r» »•"••,r*. .-•-*! J • **'J DV • ' or ropl«cen«n by th« total costs of ****J5*JK^ Mchmnsr shall bucomo llsbla;SpS?3S.:«'':h«?*J2Ji‘.“'S««r th. -«.»««i. *,«« covsnsnts with 5 a^t dascrlbod haraln. by acca harsin. and aach it shall bo so cxpraaaad Idacd thsraforo, wlia^ar or M ^jecmad to covenant wit eonvsyanca. .hall ba dJscJibed herein, that ha Ownars of all their proportionate s shall pay Pr^P^ly p^iagraph. Thu costs decosts described in^e pteceaing p obligation of the preceding paragraph such Lot at tr.e tix.e whe;; person. w!» ,re ‘»c owner, of e2pr...ly »»<«<“• >=1^ i“io T.lUTl^'rV.lll Si’.'tSJ! ?o u. Thl. eowonant .h.U i:. Thor. n.y be no pcin‘«*’t o, thl. ..n«n.nt tf‘o"^^Of the City council or the Citj III WIWESS WHERTOy, P'"( ■ ...«.nt and covenant tne day and year frr.t Jane:*MccT^ary V *• ^ V’ McOleax .r . . i *l ..r..' •• • STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ^ C»Uim OF HENNEPIN ) me foregoing in.tru«ont^wa.^ac^wljjdg^^ ', nuaband and wife.day of Notary Puoilc mm r^. --v AV -b^ ^3fcai?s A r •> • ’ \ p w 1 fr*> - • :fr V.'X I SSKaita^^ta; i iv^r ^ >»arwi-.r^ r—-^>a •- ^ '-T >o^»v •«a IP^e><>l^'w<>4asjr4t.aV n ‘fJL ^e>•^ ■ • >^.w-lbr.- . * ' ^ ir 1 *‘w . j M , »U ave... b I wt'V 4 V . j .n.-W ‘•f?: ■ a • cl ' I ly f V « * 1 . • r 1 -----M I 10 . mgiROAO QCpjjNTY ROAD Ra‘ o TTiS ‘\ -■•■•"---------- A &«Sb^ \ T.13t05 R»280 0t L-2Sa.14 ^Z0AU2 / / ■ ( / ‘ i-/ miliaiiMciM** SfO” <»q>............... : 1 p 1 ty • ‘ij e-TT-^ i 1 ♦ ••• f BASTlJJ<P|ST iEE|P t •‘O' ♦•♦•••4 i • h „• •« •: : (37)0.)6 i (Mp (♦0)(38)(3-;(32)(33) i \ _______ "X i X • _.fi___________iir<-------i.——— ------------------ 1/----------i\ o •./ f.. UFT STATION NO. 2 SITE PLAN setoei^ P^AAIS I j j //o o\,v^ -■'‘v i >CITYofORONO i-* Wj ■■•i A ll Mtinkipid OfTkcs Tost Offict Box 66 Crytud Day, Minne^ou 55J2J-0066 June 29 f 1992 Mr. Mark Husley 3464 Eastlake Street Long Laker Minnesota 55356 Re: Storage Shed Dear Mr. llusley: On April 13r 1992, this office notified you of permit requirements and zoning violations regarding a shed constructed on your property. As of this date a building permit or variance application has not been received. This letter is to inform you that if an application is not received by July 13, 1992, the City will issue citations and refer the matter to the City Attorney for further legal action. If you have any questions or if I can assist you in any way, please feel free to contact me at my office. Sincerely, L^^ Oman Building Official LO/ch cc:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator Bruce Vang, Field Inspector IT^LFTHONF. - 473-7J57 • FAX • 47M510 r CITYof ORONO MimkipaJ ORIccs PostOflktBoi66 Co’Stal Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066 April 13, 1992 Mr. Mark Husley 3464 East Lake Street Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Re: Storage Shed Dear Mr. Husley; It has come to the attention of this department that a storage shed has been constructed or placed on your property. This letter is to inform you that a building permit is required for storage shed construction in the City of Orono. This shed’s placement causes several problems. The shed does not appear to meet the required property line and septic system setbacks. A) 10' side lot line setback B) 5' rear lot line setback C) 20' mound septic system setback. Addition of shed causes property to exceed hardcover limitations. Records show property was at 25% hardeever maximum when house was built in 1984. TELErilONE-473-7357 • F,\X -4734)510 Mr. Mirk Husley April 13, 1992 Page 2 , Therefore the City must require you to remove the shed or call this department and discuss other options before April 27, 1992. If you have any questions or if I can be of assistance, please contact me at my office. Sincerely, Lyle Oman Building Official LO/ch Enc. - Permit Application CCS Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Adm Bruce Vang, Field Inspector Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager ./ i Tos Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Pron:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:September 18, 1992 Subject: #1763 Woodhill Country Club - Conditional Use Permit (Now After-the Pact) - Public Hearing Application: Conditional use permit for land alterations (approximately 10,000 cubic yards) for safety improvement to driving range area of golf course. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey/Grading Plan Air Photo Overlay Letter of Request City Engineer's Comments Stop WorJc Order Letter dated 9/18/92 After the Fact Status of Applicati( Please review the stop wor)c order letter dated September 18th. Briefly, the applicant began working with Mark Gronberg earlier this year to develop a grading plan to protect golfers from the driving range. Late in the process it was determined that the project was likely located in both the cities of Wayzata and Orono. A Wayzata permit was obtained and the Orono conditional use permit was applied for in late August. During the site inspection as part of the application review on September 15th, staff found that work was in progress. A stop work order was issued on September 16th when staff determined via air photo overlay maps that almost the entire project was in Orono. However, no survey work has been provided to establish the City .. oundary nor the portion of work which actually will occur in Orono. Please see the attached air photo overlay. Merits of Laud Alteration Permit Request Please review the City Engineer's comments. Exhibit G. His recommendation includes the following points: 1. The 2.5 to 1 slopes need protection from erosion until sod has been established. 2.Slopes will be difficult to maintain, although the applicant indicates such slopes are regularly maintained on the golf course today. Zoning File #1763 September 18, 1992 Page 2 3.Silt fence needs to immediately be installed along the southwest perimeter. 4. Existing utility lines should be shown on the survey. Staff conceptually agrees with the intent and nature of the proposed grading. Applicant has advised that the steeper slopes are necessary to control the distance golf balls will roll as they reach the perimeter of the driving range. The berms will provide a safety factor as well as function to confine the driving range activity. Staff Rern—cindation Based on the above information, staff recommends as follows: 1. Approval of the conditional use permit for 9,300 cubic yards of earth movement, plus an additional 1,000 yards of imported top 2. 3. 4. 5. soil. Adherence to City Engineer's recommendation. Payment of after-the-fact investigation fee for the CUP application in the amount of $200.00, plus double fee on the actual land alteration permit. Prior to Council approval, surveyor to define on the site and in the drawing the City boundary between Orono and Wayzata within the project area. This application will be presented for Council action at their September 28th meeting in order to avoid potential sod reestablishment problems due to impending cold weather. _______J j i ' Cl'2'i OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND PROPERTY LOCATION ^ \ ^ / f:j 100 CUOd^tULL ID U6B APPLICAAPPLICATION / - —-- - - - -OROMSE ^ ; ; •' t ! M A I Site Address ‘i I.-.V O re;,;?y •A l3502i)00C0 101 CEH 200.00 •zv^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 2r//7<-23 ^^90 cm foi JOlh• 0S/*^3/Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Naune /^O^OdJ/L*. CCt>ie Address 20^ ^0^0 Phone (home) Phone (work)97J-7SJ3 City O^Ari4T4 Zip S'SJJ/ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name C_ _ _ _ _ _ __ Phone (home) Phone Address City Zip_ Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USB PERMITS - $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling — designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTE APPLICATIONS $200.00 - - - $250.00 $175.00 $ 75.00 $300.00 $300.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezonlng (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Appeals Other “ see fee schedule J L PRESENT OSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District i6 Present Use of Property _ _ Residential Other (specify) coutS€ DBSCRIPTIOH OF REQUEST ^ ^ ^ ^ Describe request in detail: jtJffj ^ _S^f^rr ■- - - - - REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. ^ 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obta. this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governme: Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map. ^ % 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). » i a 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if lana ^ alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). ■ 6. Construction plan^ if applicable (see staff for requirements). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list or any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A flORKING COPY (ll* X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED._____ The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ Date^- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that rhe information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature ^ ^ . Date The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation amd verification of this request. Owner' s signature jH ^ ^ __n Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission , third Monday of each month. Applicants must be review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building- g Office of this change prior to the meeting. J \ mM MTC 09/Z7/n iATCN OOS HErtCPXN CQimV PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OMIERS LIST PROP AOOR SS 02-117-2S 12 0001 JD0200 NOOOHILL RD ?Z5:«T, SSSSSS SSTitu. ' HAFC/AOOR 200 NOOOHILL RO nayzata nn ssm I .. PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 50 02-117-25 lA 0001 00H5 ED6EN000 HILLS RO T A A C A CUSICK THOHAS CUSICK »A5 EOGEHOOO HILLS RONayzata iti sssti 5S 02-117-25 A1 0009 V 00050 ADORESS UNASSIGNEO!25s,sr iss: jsr ;s? 25 AOANS ST N HUTCHINSON ttl 55550 CD •• •r *- . 1 1 !' I ‘ REPORT NO. PIA55401 PAGE 5 50 02-117-25 15 OOOA 00522 NOOOHILL RO J BARTELS A R BARTELS JUERGEN A RACHEL BARTELS 520 NOOOHILL ROAO NAYZATA HN 55591 50 02-117-25 15 0005 00520 NOOOHILL RO J BARTELS A R BARTELS JUERGEN A RACHEL BARTELS 320 NOOOHILL ROAO NAYZATA HN 55591 • * » I M* • -I- • •• . 30 02-117 25 91 0002 00905 EOGENOOO HILLS RO P B HARRIS ETAL HR PHILLIP B HARRIS 905 EOGENOOO HILLS ROAO NAYZATA m 55591 30 02-117-23 91 0003 01095 EOGENOOO HILLS RD FREOA C KEITH * FREDA C KEITH P 0 BOX 296 , i NAYZATA MN S5SV1 M V i i 50 02-117-25 92 0005 00525 NOOOHILL RO J BARTELS A R BARTELS JUERGEN A RACHEL BARTELS 320 NOOOHILL ROAD NAYZATA HN 55391 TOTAL 9ATCH 005 00000 • . « DAT , • • i •'-i i I It * i. • •• '* ■ - ' COFFIN Sl GRONBERG. INC. SURVIYINQ. IHOINtmiNO AND LAND PLANNING 4G1.A TAMAAACIC AVINUI LONG LAKC. MINN. ••3BG 473-4141 8-28-92 ./ • V -i S i* -. "s 3 ••-V; 1 • / ‘.V ; r*: y;?i •!• City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Jeanne or Mike We are submitting a proposed grading plan for Woodhill Country Club. They want to lower the main part of the driving range and construct berms on the east and south sides to prevent balls from reaching the adjoining green and fairway. The overall drain age pattern will remain the same. The portion in Wayzata is being reviewed by their staff and has been verbally approved. Since this is a fairly simple request and Woodhill would like to sod the disturbed areas as soon as poss ible* this fall, we wotild like to appear on the September 28’*h council meeting immediately after the September 21st planning commision meeting. Sincerely, Mark S. Gronberg ♦ iahpAi i m i A r Bonestroo Rosene Anderifk & Associates Ono G PE Rcc«fi W Ifoic^ PE • JOieph C Anccfiik. P£ Mjrvm L Sorva»j. P0 E TyfTff PE G^rnn R Cook. PE 1Thomas E N»cyri. PE Rocen G ScrHiOcht. PE Susjn M EOe^t^n C PA •Se^'Of Coosuit^nt Engineers & Architects Hcv^artl A S^rfcn: PE ^cth A Gcfdcrx PE Roceri R P'frehc. PE RicnarO W Fo«cr PE D^vkJ O Loskota PE Rotert C RuiS^k. A I A Jr'ry A BCu'Oon PE .Mark A Hanson. PE M<ha<i T RautTiann. PE Tm *c PE Trxx*'as R Ano^r%on A IA DonakJ C Bu^yaniL PE Thomas E Angui PE Gary P Rv'a-rr PE ismae Klj-. -?/ P£ M<^act P Pa- ®£ Agnes M ? n,j A IC P Thomas *y:e'son P£ W<na«i C l>r^n. PE James R Ma and p£ Jrry D PrLSCh PE kennefh P Arjerson. PE Mark R Ro-*v PE Mark A SeCL PE Gary 'JL' ‘/c'en pe Oan<e^ J Ec^eTcn P£ Ph *c J Casvsert PE Ma:« 0 %ka.s PE V es 8 -er*;**r P£ L Phnliy G'avtl lU. PE Kartn L W^emen PE F Toca Fdsxer PE Ke<fh R Vaco PE Shawvn D Gustafson. PE Cec4« C:^v^. PE Chafes A Er<kson Leo M Pk'Ae sky Martan M O’son Jarres F Eng?:harO! September 17, 1992 Mr. Mike Gaffron City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: #1763 Woodhill Country Club File No. 139-1763 Pear Mike: We have reviewed the topographic detail plan submitted with the conditional use permit application for land alterations at the Woodhill Country Club. The two engineering issues to be noted are the proposed steep slopes and erosion control to protect a DNR protected water, identified as Basin No. 27-852P. The protected water is located at the downstream end of an existing 36" CMPA culvert. The side slopes of ib£ proposed safety berms are <:hown at 2.5 to 1 (horizontal to vertical). These slopes will be difficult to maintain and will be prone to excessive erosion until the proposed sodding has had an adequate time to establish a strong root base. This may not be established until well into the spring season. The entire grading area covers approximately 3 acres and an erosion control plan should be submitted for our review. Specifically, silt fence should be installed along the southwestern perimeter of the grading area that has direct runofi to the protected water. This perimeter is several hundred feet in length. Existing utility lines should be shown from the catch basin and manholes. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Shawn D Gustafson, P.E. SDG:Ik 233S West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota SSI 13 • 612-636-4600 I -r //I/O ll .V.V,U h 'v-V\ • i . t • • • ^ CITYof ORONO MunkifMlOfficfS PlDSI Office Bok 66 Cnstal Bav. MinncsoU 553234)066 HAND DELIVERED September 16, 1992 Rick Fredrickson Grounds Superintenden Woodhill Country Club 200 Woodhill Road Wayzata, MN 55391 RE: Land Alteration Conditional Use Permit ■* File #1763 Work Without Appropriate Permits Dear Mr. Fredrickson: This letter is to follow-up our conversations of September 15 and 16. A review of City air photo overlay maps indicates that the majority of the intended driving range grading project is within the City of Orono. It is my understanding from your engineer, Mark Gronberg, that you have obtained a permit for the grading work from the City of Wayzata. Unfortunately, it appears that only a small portion of the project is in the City of Wayzata. I am enclosing copies of Orono Muncipal Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19, 20 and 21, which govern land alterations. Subdivision 19 clearly indicates that it is unlawful to grade existing land so as to elevate or alter the existing natural grade without a conditional use permit issued by the Council (which you applied for two weeks before commencing work). The exemption for grading associated with a building project as noted in Subdivision 21, clearly does not pertain to your project. As we discussed on the site, all work on the project must cease immediately, and may not continue until the project is approved by the City Council. In the interim, you must provide silt fencing and sediment control at the inlet of the culvert within 48 hours to eliminate any potential sediment discharges to the wetland at its outlet. I have discussed this briefly with Mark Gronberg. ItLEPHON'E-473-7357 • F\X 473-0510 4 ^------^ * * Rick Fredrickson September 16, 1992 Page 2 Regarding the stockpiling of approximately 1,000 cubic yards of topsoil on the site for restoration, because this would appear to be a necessary part of restoration regardless of the outcome of the CUP application, such stockpiling Ccn continue. Please have your engineer indicate on a copy of the site diagram where the stockpiling will take place. Please provide a Certificate of Survey verifying the location of the City boundary within or adjacent to the project area. This will be needed in order for final approval to be granted. Given the unfortunate circumstances of the situation, the time of year and the need to revegetate the 3 acres of bare ground as soon as possible, after recommendation by the Planning Commission or September 21, the application will be presented directly to the Council at their September 28 meeting for final action. An after-the-fact investigation fee equal to the land alteration permit and conditional use permit application fees will be assessed, since this project is now being reviewed as an after-the-fact situation, and because work commenced without permits even though you and your engineer were fully aware of the need for permits from Orono. Please contact me at 473-7357 if you have any questions. A copy of the staff memc and recommendation to Planning Commission will be forwarded to you prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Sincerely, Michael P. Gaffron Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Enclosures cc:Mark Gronberg, Coffin & Gronberg Charles Kelley, Planning Commission Chairman Glenn Cook, City Engineer Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Allan Orsen, City of Wayzata MPG/lsv m i-r To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Fron: £>ate: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator September 17, 1992 Subject: #1765 John E. Moore/James B. Cradit & Associates, 801 Tonkawa Road - Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB, Single feunily lakeshore residential, 1 acre minimum lot size Application: Request for hardcover and setback variances to construct additions to existing residence Variances Requested: 1.Hardcover variance in 0-75* zone to increase from 10.0% to 10.3%. 2.0-75* setback variance to allow construction of second story over existing master bedroom and 90 s.f. room addition over existing ground. Existing Proposed Required OR Allowed Variance Required 0-75* hardcover 10.0%10.3%0%10.3% 75-250* hardcover 15.7%16.1%25%— 250-500* hardcover 21 i 5%21.5%30%— Lake Setbacks: Dinette area 541 49*75*26* Adj. existing 2nd 44' +(no change)75*— story bedrooms New 2nd story 60*60*75*15* above MBR List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Application Letter of Request Photos Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Site Plan Construction Plans Hardcover Worksheets i V. . .gt. Zoning File 11765 September 17, 1992 Page 2 Summary AOApplicant proposes to construct a number of small addition to the existing residence. A portion of the existing residence is in the 0-75' zone, and two of the additions are less than 75' from the shoreline. The room addition labeled A on the site plan is a 5* x 14' dinette addition with 4* x 5* stoop, all on the main floor level. This bumpout is approximately 49' from the shoreline, although it is further from the shoreline than the adjacent second story overhanging bedrooms. Additionally, a second story excercise/office addition of approximately 16' x 24' is proposed above the footprint of the existing main floor master.bedroom. This addition is 60* from the shoreline. Issues 1.Is there sufficient hardship/justification for the granting of hardcover and setback variances as requested? 2.Is there additional hardcover area in the 0-75' zone that could be reduced or removed to yield a net hardcover reduction or no net increase in the 0-75' zone? 3.Are there other locations in which the proposed additions could be accomplished outside the 0-75' zone? =^V74- i CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application utt .•- -5/ o o fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) 03 )l‘7 OOP I Attach legal description to application if not . included on required survey. ) Date Property Acquired . '83______(month/year) I (41) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FIHAtiCE OFFICE Present use of property: X residential ____other(specifotj^p?^^/)________ Zoning District:________(_A ____________ Oi CSV 225.00 APPLICANT ------------------------------------------------------------ Phone (home) YOU Ncune C4U^OIJ tAS^C. U250S0d COdi ROi r08:3i Phone (work) 03''23/9I Address: ^*7 Aoft. M.®*City: Zip: S:T*f/3 OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) 7feE. I Name E. t^OoftC.Phone (work) V7 /^78 2./ Address. *7<^**<^*^A i1 Zip:_^535C DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $. Describe request in detail :~IO A *To f Sif- e>4ac.iO oWg'MnU t gp (A A<IMA __________________ VARIANCES RBQOIR] Lot Area Lot Width X Hardcover Lot Coverage y Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (cpecify) HARDSHIP/DBSCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:_______ ** 5frrrAcM 0O ‘SAHSis ___________________________________ 1 4-^-t' ik'.k 1^.I.... i--. (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of -the followincr information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete; 1. ^ Cornpleted Application Form 2. ^ Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. V Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. ^ Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8Jj"xll" for reproduction). ufMra 5. Topographic survey -(existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll"). 6. X S)cetches or plans.of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8J5"xll"). 7. _^As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of ‘any' other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the_ inforaati^n has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her. knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date ONNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further Authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members,' and Council • members for^purposes of investigar tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature E _ _ _ _ _ _ Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 6 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. iyi - 7 ^ •» f' •Tr-*** V.. •^1w i .!■'' ) 1 y t>ve. vtoRostf-i'p or t-Mis PRoju -t is t«e. pft«s*«T ubia-ivo^ o'r Aff (2o>t( r»»<^rfcy ^0*/C UooSC Ofec4c- f»J tMC- 0-7^'-5ETf>neic. A*J® '*"AC. % op 4-looS£^ 6^4<<k.€ i 5’CcvA^M/AiC TUAT *5 L^CA-r^ |ij “752' AlLfeA ^ U^niCi4. ALX^ ljoCA~^t^ N»^ THE SE- ©F the. -The. Mouse- <5» f^e,Tuje^ 3«-<ad yvfto<.* fAo$ SSuCK4K^ AOOf7?Q*^^ Af^o /2E^O j OEC5, /V^AtC4AtCm 'Tf4'£- pO^i^A0»rf AETTAi^ L//Efev VtFF^^tj>T * 7V€. ^Um/(6^ < 0€i^6*jg^ U a *J^ MAiC$U9 0^7ieMj^fO€CY OfF Ois/ TA/T ^>93T- -2. V/CA^^ TO B4U»0ifSC i ry)t aj itZ^£^ A aj Y fiLO0irfO»IAC^ ^ua»LE FooTo^e-. XAJTti£ ^>6rr^Acic. we HAuie aoo«o okjl V ^<s> ^ as shoujm A«*4 X XV) THE ^CrftA«A u»e HAOt Aooto oiuty *256 «J5, WITH 72 liJ 1*1 Z A eaa “c " a ^o Z2.tfi ti A(mA '*D r 4 AOPIT.00*., Uo.KJt, Arix-. WA^ p>y fftAtoa^vc. t^o ib0,L^,uc A 2->^ sr.itY ou«« TMt. Itwir.^c. ^Ar/e^ 0€A/Uar^ A^o S.)cfS-r,^C. &a >laa 6. A c-o^c. L^,rA (Ui^ooAMAt. -r^tC £fe^-r^AA ^ C-# ^/I Ait o^/fi *ti4^ $ff,T(-5AO^ O-TS' o<^ ^0■^^^9.■ AttA AOO.TIO^ ,,4 5^, <2.0 fir' , •$t > . -I .■W» r4•; w -j ‘‘.L. mj "A • asuai ' *»al • .>»JLJU^ * K« • i I .* 11 •i«» 3l , r t i fl^ M* ‘MV • •. *«i^4. ^---«* ■%IS C* .^' ^ r P '■t/^ P .X • U* • * ' ■ i^’»« |»\ y :tA.^■|k' 'I <. s: . ••'.•'".4.V,' *Tv»^ ' V ■ >^ - . -. / S > !> ': i < »•■ -i . .*» «9> ' ' , * • _ ■» li /.M > •'*• <■ '■,■ * i .! M ‘‘ ‘‘^ > ! t 'I 1 J! 44* r mv jn If 3'(l;7'a3- •••* I^IKII^EinDKiKA 70PJH ARM ti K1 u VJ> «J? '02'H7'a3'@) RUN DATE Oa/2A/92 BATCH 004 PROP ADDR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/AODR SO 05-117-2S S3 0003 00755 TONKAHA RD J A L ROGERS JOHN E A LOIS A ROGERS 755 TONKAHA RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 PROP AOOR QNNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/AODR 30 05-117-23 34 0007 00760 TONKAHA RD CHARLES A BERTELSON CHARLES A BERTELSON 760 TONKAHA RD LONG LAKE m 55356 PROP AOOR OltCR NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR SO 05-117-23 34 0010 00700 TONKAHA RO T R A T J HAUGAN TOOD R A TERESA J HAUGAN 700 TONKAHA RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 PROP AOOR OUHtn NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 30 00-117-23 21 0002 00045 TONKAHA RD H AOELSHEIH JR ETAL H ADELSHEIH JR 025 TOTiCAHA RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 * I f •. I •« * . < r - / ! • ’ 4 r % I I '■• • y. ■ • * ■; i . * : •1 t% » ^ , •< J. r • f *>.. ■‘i7 •• i ■t ir ■* 1 HEFt^PIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY (SOBERS LIST I* t- '■f • I i i •* : r 4 n- * 1 I REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 9 30 05-117-23 34 0005 00746 TONKAHA RO E A CALDHELL AMT CALDHELL EOHARD A A MARY T CALDHELL 746 TONKAHA RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 30 05-117-23 34 0006 00750 TONKAHA RD HENRY E BENSON ETAL HENRY E BENSON 750 TONKAHA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 : * » 4 30 05-117-23 34 0000 00770 TONKAHA RD MAUREEN LOUISE LAJOY MAUREEN LOUISE LAJOY 770 TONKAHA RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 30 05-117-23 34 0009 00774 TONKAHA RD C FISHER Aft4 C FISHER 774 TOMCAHA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 ‘ Nl: u* it { . \r V: i.1 ;;; i . V ,t <• ■, ^ V t 30 05-117-23 34 0013 00075 PARTENKOOD LA J B MCELHANEY/J B MCELHANEY JACK B A JUDY B MCELHANEY 075 PARTENHOOD LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 30 00-117-23 21 0001 00801 TONKAHA RO J E A L B MOORE JOHN E A LOURDES B MOORE BOl TONKAHA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 30 00-117-23 21 0003 00047 TONKAHA RD G A C COLLINS III GEORGE/CHARLOTTE COLLINS III 847 TONKAHA RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 4 ■ * ' I TOTAL BATCH f. \ I •A • i* 4 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION^ TO THE BEST OF MY KNONLEOGE AND BELIEF. DATl 004 00011 • • i I. V. ) =i'..t' f «*' ■i •# * # 4 •. ■i- (•' M V ^ Vlltfjv ; • I < * . k ' I * »• . . ; 1J • ' )n i ■'•I 'li:» II ■J-- / •i 1. t * ♦ s K 'i!. .7 :v •} # 4 /»C fc4vj ---^- - ,-5rW:W^ b. ■• mm 1 ! _ f»*io*4r gte^yArxTKj !!*• I- e> -^ s,.* ri-**-T* - -— • rwur •i-evA.T'OrvT wr«i o f.*^ •• A^t •*■ -• -w.»» »!»»>. .V,». ; V *J 11^ a:* I I y I M ^ »^*uepr &t-gvmTie>j ^r> I* ........................----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- iw>»/xrig>i4 «/•!*• t. 1^ ■i ■ '*--- ’-. ’1 ■' 'i. <i >.-.ii'lv mm ■ ' —~i - ^ ^ P^-Jfi l!! ■ ~ txStsiJn ta»i* «'*=! !F^!au!u:s lllllllllill J n • • T**-*l ! ••• i.4“^^ 4 rl^<ygP- PufkNl •••. f -r; tsL hardcover CALCUUTIOfniORKSHEET SETBACK zone: (cipcle one) 75-250 Existing Hardcover in Zone 250-500' 5GC-1GQ0' A. House _ LENGTH B, . c. Driveway 0. Sidewalk F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY , . PLASTIC SHEETING G, Other - K X — X — X X WIDTH Total Hardcover in Zone 0 - S.F. S.F. S.F. .F. S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. _ S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S • F • ■IMJ.S.F Total Property A rea in Zone T] ?.6n 0^^---- S.F /o B X 100 -% tfAiiJL- HARDCOVER CALC’JLATICM WORKSHCT SETBACK zone : (circle ome ) 0^75' (^isoy 250-500' 500-1000' E xisting Hardcover J‘‘<_2one V ____________ « ‘ZoOO _ S.F.A. House LENGTH WIDTH /74 /60 _ X B. Garage c. Driveway D. Sidewalk e. P atio/ Deck X p.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY I . PLASTIC SHEETING 6. 9^R S.P. S.F. S.F. S.F S.F, ^ 3^7 S.F. S.P. S.F. S.F S.F. S.F. S.F S.F S.F S.F, ___iJ. Total Hardcover in Zone S.F. Total Property Area in Zone S.F,B /O,^^ , X 100 f/% 1 rtOTlHflhrilffrTUrriiTr ■^CTiaatl HARDCOVER CALCOLATICM WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ome) 0-75' 75-250 ( ^500-1000 Existing Hardcover in Zone • • A .3k''., X 2-{i^ __S.F. w\ • LENGTH WIDTH 7>, . A/y/- y* ./X /20 S.F. /^^7/y/> Ci / - X .= ^ • • . S.F. t m • X .9 • ,. S.F. X -S.F. a RAOAfiP Z4 X 30 a 72.0 S.F. O f VJMnMwC a. /• Hotv/C^AV X a 7.0 39 S.F. V» • I • X S • • sip. n. * • • Sidewalk r/.'T X /'). ?3ic S*r t u • /4 X /<?-. S.F. z X .Zc>,. S.F. E. '^0/ .X .S.F. p.Laiidscape • X a •, S*r# AREAS UNDERLAIN BY X ri s.r. O 1 1 M PLASTIC «• • SHEETING•X .S.F. 1 X .S.F. G. 1Other X ..75 S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone n.ic-A j /e>0 O S.F S.F • • A B a ]B X 100 »'?-\5 ^ / < L____iL iiillti r iU[lELyu^^Ll :P ann'i O/'cL rva SEP 2 1 1992 Wd. Qfe c>3r» 3u-ioci» u\vS/£>o ^I cjLi-*^v fi^oy bx. ae. L/oabU "b bc.+he/^ -fK‘<a e^>cA 7V^ recaCA’ci "TD Tf^U- j0A>jO0Sec! t>0 (jOx bua/c«r- t2DU-:M\ cS/cia.. dec^eicpS-o-^tfA-/-L*^(L bi-tx- Po oi^e.c4^orxi JotcV UUisU ~fe ■6^'^Couf^ 6CT^ic3^ra,4icxN fYtecL^ Of- \L uXUj ii; cbn«- 4 d builci i/v, pc.ec«j>s rooci «2o -"Kz. ci/6b^na^>^'^cioc2^ lo'hyfe/ii- uopk CVr Onci- dfQi S'it lJr^\elr\ fun Q. jvlor-Hn> s<(i^ fVl “flv brvu. O'-v fd^v(eA'b %se.^ as \jJaAjJ^Je, Trs oil y«i. do no Dr^ Cmt prX|32^Oo 0>-V piX2^>2£:^ d^l^lcpGci u3€LA_ ^ CcxI-cL-^c-/ "HW" iiii. Ixul-fz b^n"" C/^kdc'-S^c- "4 d bte- Gop^pltv-itfjd ■ Oo-^ ne^qVxbocs \xiu<. Q.1 l 00-^^ h>^ej-> Cxx^'fax^ Oj^^ 'teL^ft-ci- Vvoi>a Tn and 0^ 0^ ~H\l, Pei‘^kfci-(\co ci ePpiCJeprf^. "SfiCQjui^ b^iJla- 4^uLc-b Inoix- bee/N bCicJl ja CUr p^v5t^^/^^i^ deA, (je/'iis, ijl X 0-rc Ce^ici-A-l- 4k^ -}i<. Ctd-cL-^c. U aW \3£(?tA^ 4^ tl-b (5» COc 6,OGC.CCO<:« Ui. hnc^.rrV^tA cmc\\\L crp 0^ ne;^kbcrKc>D il/skaci T^ nob CVxj.n^ biv. ^-bbi/skaci' p:^'bu-N03 b\/_s • It- *HfYhL LPh "ft)/" <:^lb(xy-) U-L~^ Ob\c>-Cxx^ CoASic!Verbcns ( y ^Oirvi 0-4* ScumL dsovi- <2.ypf<i^ o^r Conftckncii^ rr^ 4k. 6D>yl^s Mr. Michael Gaffron Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Orono, Minnesota W____ClTYO« onoNC J SEP 2 1 1992 September 17, 1992 Re: Proposal *1762 - Paul W. Boyke Subdivision Dear Mr. Gaffron: My husband ^Jim and I are concerned about Paul W. Boyke's proposed subdivision. We have lived at 259 Hollander Road for two and a half years and our property borders Mr. Boyke’s lot. Our property and Mr. Boyke’s are beautiful examples of the natural wild environment areas that Orono has worked hard to preserve and protect. Lydiard Lake and its surrounding wetlands, located in the proposed subdivision area, is home to many types of birds, wildlife, trees, and plantlife which my family and I enjoy observing and protecting. One concern we have about Proposal *1762 is that the proposed subdivision is quite close in proximity to Lydiard Lake and its surrounding wetland area. Does the City of Orono consider this proximity appropriate in meeting the standards set forth in the Shoreland Management Ordinance document? Will the subdivision proximity be appropriate in preserving this natural wetland/lake area suid protecting it from decay? The building site, as proposed, appears to be placed on a sloping area of land or bluff with the house sitting below land on three sides. What effect will drainage or land erosion, resulting from removal of large mature trees from the building site, have on Lydiard Lake? What effect will a sewer/septic system, placed on a bluff impact area, have on the wetland area below, especially considering storm water runoff? h laW-B tkMtLiz -------------------- We feel that the proposed new construction will have a negative impact on this beautiful natural shoreland area and that the proposed subdivision is not appropriate for the Lydiard Lake area. Thank you for your attention. Sincerely, ^ Derorah C. Higgins «James C. Higgins 259 Hollander Road Orono, Minnesota