Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-20-1992 Planning PacketP\-Tr::\ mm vr*. r PIANHING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, JULY 20, 1992, 7:00 P»M, 1275 BROUN ROAD SOOTH - OOONCIL CHAMBERS NCIL RBPRESENTATI^ - Edward Callahan ATTBHDANCB SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING 1. 7:00 p.m. m''/ #1749 Janes F. Lawrence, 1550 Sixth Avenue North - Preliminary Subdivision 2. 8:00 p.m, ■■ Sfcr.v Zoning Code Amendment Standards for Commercial and Residential Docks that Employ Styrofoam for Flotation Purposes Wi ■'■d ACTION ITEMS - Review of these items will commence prior to or between scheduled public hearings. Applicants presenting variance requests before the CoBsy.s8ion are asked to move to the podium at the front of chambers when their application is announced by the Chairman. #1746 Thomas and Margaret Lowe, 2630 West Lafayette Road — Variances - Public Hearing #1747 '' ' 5 #1748 John O'Sullivan, 2420 Shadywood Road - Renewal Variance - Public Hearing . ''t; - 4_r ; Bob Hovland, 1245 North Arm Drive - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing 6. #1750 Charles and Shirley Pyle, 3548 Ivy Place Variance - Public Hearing 7. -^#1752 - ••• George W. Kalweit, 4265 Forest Lake Drive - Variance - Public Hearing #1753 Skip Madge, 875 Forest Arms Lane ~ Variance - Public Hearing #1754 E. Leo Bullock, 2940 Casco Point Road “ Variance ~ Public Bearing Leonard Niska, 2304 Shadywood Road - " Variance - Public Hearing - To be Continued at Later Date #1756 Robert E. Wilson - 4156 Highwood Road - Variance - Public Hearing #1757 Albert D. Hanser, 1685 Fox Street - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing r ,..:>i| ■t.i- ',. • •• • i.. PLAMNING COMNISSIOH <-.✓ Report by Planning Commission Representative to Council Meeting of July 13, 1992 (Candace Rowlette). Status Report by Lake Use Committee Representatives. a." Status Report - Municipal Facilities Other issues. Planning Commission approval of minutes of June 15, 1992 meeting. is. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the August 10, 1992 Council Meeting. i.ih:» l** ■ I V - ■ '"-'yi mrnM- m-am - v -.vUl sm'-M yrn ■fm ■yjV>A S.-v'.V;.> V. >>.v; • liPi mm ilKr:0S'}> F- •to: Pi.?-; fc;;:....: Ml isi Wm:.mmmms: Vi - ;fr" i"V'": ■ ; ■?■■' r.;,V • --\i Planning Coinnission JUmt, in :, A' r-.1 CITY OF ORONO , . ■ O Council m PUBLIC ATTENDANCE J MEETING DATE 71'^^j^SL f f«, '! , ■ i PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)wK\ ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1. ^^i/l/ocJ^ •ag y;<>L Cnic^ f’ikt L f^i'c,htx!CvA. *8^ D,'’2xtlT^ C Ox^tc .! 9. y i si ^/tJi£^ ^ I 7SL> /1 r 3 m !V-':"^'-v • ^ “*(/ -1- ’:Mat 1^ i * \a ' ' •■•*( ../ r , • » :« ' fvV V M-S Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator . .' ■. ...v- ■ V r?-^ * ..-.•••-■* «.Vf. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator July 16, 1992 ^ #1749 James F. Lawrence, 1550 Sixth Avenue North - Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing t inent Ordinances -1* rSi^- yh: ^i3 Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C-1) - Setbacks from protected tributaries. A. Structural (unsewered) Required «* 100' Note all structures on developed Lot 1 meet the required structural setback I Sepuic Required “75' On-site Septic Manager confirms existing septic system meets the required 75' setback from the protected tributary Section 10.56, Subdivision 8 (B) and Subdivision 16 (L) - Review Exhibit G. Protected area adjacent to the tributary has been it-v. designated and the hardcover areas defined. Chapter 11 - subdivision is a Class III. List of Bxhiblts A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Weekman Memo - 1-2 Septic Site Plans P - Preliminary Plan G “ Protected Tributary Setback and Hardcover Standard H - RLS #1418 I - Resolution #866 Preliminary Plat for Tanglewood J - Resolution #896 Pinal Plat for Tanglewood K - Road Section - Tanglewood L - Tanglewood Plat M - 1967 Zoning Code fv N - Building Permit #1940 "^*^^^ 3 u' •> .• V' : . U." -V • • • • 1 ;• ^ V • ■ :v^ ■■■ ■ rv • •,• • ;v' ' ^ . ' ,.r-' 't: ; r'^y.x- V ; v- . ■; Si. [•V 'm:'■y ' r^'. t :,4‘; ^ ■ .*• ..*1 ■^i : ■ Zoning File #1749 July 16, 1992 Page 2 m- "K«- ;• fe*''-' SRSf ■ifeu,. W- Dettcnriptlon of Request ■-i, r-- vijf ' H ^ The applicant proposes the division of Lot 4, Tanglewood into two —--..parcels. Lot 1, the developed lot shall continue to achieve access ISP'Via Tract E of RLS #1418. The owner of Lot 4 has never developed an access off of Tanglewood Road. Lot 1 will remain a through lot.^ All RR-IB area and setback standards have been «’»-*-isfied for the existing structures on proposed Lot 1. All exi - structures and septic drainfield area meet the required setbac/c jf the shore land dis^i<^. Each of the lots meet the required width of 200' at the rear of the L front street setback of 50'. As already noted above. Lot 2 will achieve access via Tanglewood and will be subject to all the private covenants currently in effect. The new curb cut or access at Tanglewood will require approval of the Public Works Director. ■:« Review Exhibits D and E 1-2. Weckraan's memo confirms that each site has adequate area for development of conforming on-site septic systems.,^ % Staff has included the road section for Tanglewood and the preliminary and final subdivision resolutions granting approval of the plat (Exhibits I, J and K). Note that in 1978 the paving of private roads was not required. Portions of the road have been paved by individual property owners. As the enclosed resolutions note, there are private covenants for maintenance purposes in place and the City had obtained the necessary access and utility easements over the road outlet. b!i-■ ,f, . '■■■■ -.*.r Lot 1 will meet the area requirements for a guest house use as Lot 1 is shown at 4.42 acre. The guest house is currently served by the existing septic system that serves the residence and alternate septic testing confirms that the guest house will continue to be served by a shared system. In reviewing the records (Exhibits M ^Dd N), staff notes that the guest house was constructed in 1967 and the current residence in 1960. The code at that time would have required a conditional use permit for a guest house. Staff is not clear as to the relevance of the information written out on building permit for guest house as RLS #1418 was not approved until 1976. At any rate, no subdivision would have had an impact on the guest house use because of its proximity to the principal structure. Staff should have required a conditional use permit. The Planning Commission must make a recommendation concerning the need for applicant to file a current conditional use permit for the guest house. The pond on Lot 1 has existed on the property for many years and was probably installed by the original owner. In the past, the City has always asked for a drainage easement over the defined or existing retention areas. Staff would recommend that the City obtain a drainage easement over the pond area. ' V. K. T-.: ■■ W X-^m^> - ' '■*''Vi.a -Upri|WP« I', ■ J#;, :■•, »••• ■ >r .: Soning File July 16, 19 '^iiv,.page 3 % .v;/. v^“:'-■•; Ko'. ■ - 0 . i * •. .V rvv ■;:.. . ,vv ■ : .,:> ¥ . m :5.W :K' ^Mm: ;rm:: staff Reconendation * ■. • *•' IT’ '■■■. ■■ ■m «BH f To^ recommeud approval of the two lot subdivision of Lot 4, Tan^lewood# finding all standards of the RR—IB zoning districtr Shoreland Regulations and subdivision regulations of the City have been met by the subdivider. Approval is subject to the following conditions; 1. / •:••■•'): •• 'V. *f9 i i\. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for new construction on Lot 2, the alternate drainfield site must be staked and protected prior to any land alterations on the property. I!?' • 2. '■ City to acquire a drainage easement over the pond on Lot 1. 3. >5" Subdivider to dedicate 10' wide drainage and utility easement along the perimeter boundaries of the properties if^ not already dedicated within the Tanglewood Plat and a 5 wide drainage easement along the newly defined interior lot line between Lots 1 and 2. i J ^ A Access to Lot 1 shall remain via Tract E of. RLS #1418 and access to Lot 2 shall be via Tanglewood Road. The future owner of Lot 2 roust obtain a permit from the Public Works Director for the installation of a curb cut onto private road.wpmn m mmm:-- . S'"' a,j 6. Prior to firiST plat approval, subdivider shall provide written documentation that Lot 2 will be governed by all current covenants and agreements involving road maintenance, etc. for the Tanglewood Plat. Lot 1 is classified as a through lot. Owner is advised that a conditional use permit is required for the construction of all accessory structures. 7.Planning Comndssion should make a recommendation concerning the need for a current conditional use permit for gues^ house use. ^ Im- * ' ' • -.1/ j • • • t -i; • ■r. = ' *■ wm V.i»B ■■M 'ppj m :mmR#.mm. U:A ^5SS1 hT^ #4-?-^ H H SMiMtTTTTT? m mmm mm *f'» .: "0 - SOBDIVISION APPLICATION D t / ✓ (►! ^ J WON ^ Mi _JtU 0 JL. /.5*??o Ao ^aI) LdiA/=9 ^ biflcation Number (P.I.D.) ^O “ 11S ^ Z3 5 ”2. H^(3 one - Property ____ abstract or % 4 i| iV;;.;; ' torrens? description to application.V. ■*«■> «i> MB W «M «W M M •« M «W ««««■ «M «*«»«» Cerent than applicant) Phone (home) ___ Phone (work) Phone (home) Phone (work) list ii more than one) USE . Tax Parcels '' City:Zip:-•••:. •?4 '■'s' !nt Size W'avt OF oiwm ^se (check) oning District Acres Dry Land FlHAivCE OFFICE Acres Wet Land U50200000 Acres Total, all parcels 01 OEIi 375.00 CHECK Jl 275.00 Residential; no. of unit^ECEjf-T-lHm' YOU Other (specify) 4245'JiO uOOt h OJ 704:2 — 06/24/9 Division for Tax Purposes ® Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites i: r of Building Sites:( MeT# sed Gross Density: urn Lot Size: * H sed Use: (check) Existing Units New Units Total Units i||jp Units per ^ Acres Jfil'Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) \y •-y ■•-'■•-''i .'. ; 'j^j pi V'-y; -A ■ ryr >milXHOM MATERIAL HBCBSSARY FOR ^ X • Comple'ted Application Form ?LBTE PRELIMIMARY APPLICATIOM 2Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. ^ 3 certified Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you must obtain3. certitiea rropetty * _ _ _n-<?n3 r:nv<- r^n^-orthis list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 4.& As”an*^ad^ to this application, please attach a separate list of348-3271). uny other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is Dateeonplete• ;oning Official’s Signature 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date- - - - - FEES S)cetch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I & ZI Subdivision) $200.00 300.00 300.00 Preliminary Review (Class III & all non-residential)325.00 + 25.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 175.00 Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Pinal Subdivision Application The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees, established by ordinance. Applicant's Signatu Omar's Signature Date Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all schedii^lea review meetings of the Planning Ccanmission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorised agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. I li ■ - I 1?* ’ • 'i . * v': i^C^;- /.'^' " • , ,.r^W ’■ »":"•■ (. A.. f ; —■* ■ •?%!-‘;^' ■ ................*• :,- .■ ..■■...' ....................................■-■.■■ r:':, • -4^ ■ • «*v ■*T* . , ^ »i .’#»> • ‘I •.»^" .-. ...... r- ‘ V.- *. *^'. V ^ 3Wm»*' i*i. • •• » ••-• •*• • ■ ■ • ■»• '•■ 1^' *'*“ •■■.'• ' *'i V .^J <*. ''-.s ^'Xif' . . i T ' • r ■^. ^.;* • - M * = . f '5./ • .-i»n' * '••'*:**, ' ' *' .'.^ ■ ‘ , . V. ‘ v*; • . . ^ ; ' -A*5-V# • ;. . I. • JU - > . . - ^ • ‘' . ; ._ »---«i. - ■-.*• *> r- ■ '^ - •• J ' ' -■■ <L ^ •*''t 4f ■•• . ;. ■I ii l\ . :'■ ..’.‘"lil- 5;^' ri m V- -■ ^- ; .. *:v.’ ' • ■ ■ ■'■--• ' ■-■* • f\.:. -r f :. - _ ^ •4!:. -V 4 A4j . . 7y ‘ ■ • 'Wi^: ■■ r-‘. ^ 1^ ■ ■' . ,us-‘- • »“• • XT.-',4. •*%: -f' '' . V. S 5..J y C.d% tiLii.,. : V S'"v 4-V'.vlsi'fe,.:i C TO; FROM; DATS: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Stephen Weckman, On-Site System Manager July 14, 1992 SUBJECT: Subdivision #1749, Jim Lawerence - Septic Review ^ I have reviewed the proposed septic system testing and " design for this property and would make the following coiiunents. iv LOT 1 -I f £:A This lot has an existing residence with an on-site sewage treatment system. The system is listed as a substandard system which includes two 800 gallon concrete block septic tanks and approximately 300 s.f. of drain field trenches. The septic system was installed in 1960 and no problems have been noted to date. Soil testing has been provided indicating alternate drainfield site suitable for a four bedroom and a one bedroom guest house. Specific septic system details are included below: - Depth of seasonal saturation (mottling) is 1', requiring a mound. Slope is 0%. The percolation rate averages 8.1 minutes per inch at 12 inches. Topographic location and site drainage is adequate. All setbacks meet city code. '1 Soil testing and septic design have been approved for a five bedroom home including primary and alternate drainfield sites. Both sites meet MPCA rules Chapter 7080 as well as Orono City Code Section 12.30 requirements. Specific septic system details are included below: Depth of seasonal saturation (mottling) is 1' to 2' for both primary and alternate drainfield sites. Slope at the primary and alternate drainfield sites is 3% and 3% respectively. Percolation rates average 8.5 minutes per inch at 12 inches. ‘ ■ . ‘ :;h r.-:\ ' , . •: '• ••■•;•■. i -r- :•,'Mi..' aiJ i Septic Review - #1749 July 14, 1992 Page 2 of 2 % \J • K ■■ ■r-M lAf *.i / I Both sites require mound drainfields. Toi^raphic location and site drainage Is adequate. All set backs meet city code. mX; mM-'l ***Note that the alternate drainfield site lies directly between the access road and the primary drainfield site. Snow fencing must be placed around the alternate drainfield site prior to issuance of a buidling permit to assure that construction activities for both the house and the primary drainfield do not compact this site. wmm ■i-T' ^ mmrn m w^w “ ^ w • t !• . '^.VXf- . ■ ■ * - iv" '■! '.yf- '■• • * • • 1 . t • - .X' r.-. V • i :Tv-' ■ . ^ mm: * i • ' t "i**,:. ^ ’-If*#? rpmsmk m ^'lii •• • ■ ■ ■•■ ^^/:,v. -V-'.r.’T ■ • pin^i.i: :^s : -K-m y':.m.wuia1i» MM .V...,-..v ,, . ■»x.l mmmK: j. * mi'f.i i . -- .. y X/ - \ .r ' XI.-: m .;•=•■■ ■■■ lifer' ^4|8|c ; ■' •. /I .•t.., :i mm i V.r ■;S;* ■ -'■ . : ■ ‘ ' ' ■*:?.-3!^wE;.g£«y -•■A"-C-.>■■■-.">a :..vi-*-a * : . ' ' . ’ * • * . * ^ 1 .’’i Ha-; ::■•■•. a ■<> ; v^tWJic ■ . ■•.t.'«^fc.__iftiH/iiHiiAni i . .. _____..^... ---------------------.:1.^. mmm fe-.Z-V' . * .:vt: ' V '■ ••• -4:::^‘liiv:7sg; "i-'V. . ■:•->• • ^ :.v: .•^- ■sf-: mm 7;.7v;7:7*fi4 I. iti " sIks-'' fi ,-.v, ^. mm ’•'■'VS t l^'thk‘CltS^* Cmin^4 h*ii AV ' r • >^ 1 # Uiiirf: • ' /-^ •' ffl J? » V •*•<• wv-y/:,.- -. ^v<r >* - • ^ 4. :>' . . 'V.^T/ ^ **- -•. ^ «• *^- • 1 ■ • **• Llvuloa «n4 0iiptie syttoi regulationa ;£dr« •*x« d«v«Iopto«at o£ land idLthla ;iai*Xlty;i «r^ ' .rmsnnV.? ^L'^i- ■''■^■ '-^■^ L'^ P t ^wow. THEREFORE. BEnT HESOLVED. < Informtlon prMratad bj the epplleent end reports ewiate^ end the PlennlnE^Coianleelon, the.City;COTncui< - City of Or^ hereby epprovee the prellalnery plet for Jeaie Lawrence with the following ehengee end requlr«ente end™ le^Dralnege plena, eesementa, cul-de-aae location, erosion control and street gradients shall be approved by the City Engineer. plans and erosion control measures shell ' ' approved by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. J.v'Access shall be by a private road developed within a 50 ft. wide right-of-way with an underlying access easement dedicated to-the ;Clty . and wit SKSy f\ii*b the location approved by^thevHennepln^County.; -f5f -royi 4.i^^ DougUs Dayton .^subdlylslon^ishalliflrstiibe approved and ‘a ‘r^elptfr* - ' •• ^•' • * .-*4 • > e»Mia *y 'V.^ ^tk < I- t ’ , • % * • ' i *.' ^ -f r 2W ^:vj; tu • • *V-. t* 3WP -♦t rv' •f»«-. , ».► *4 * ^ ^ ' •« '* • a'l • .ro.the City.'o f^r eeor ding '^delivered -' •A <> S^^The new division shall consist of 6 lots (l^ts 1,' 2, 3 and 4 combined, 5 and 6 combined, 7 and 8 as shown on the revised 11-30-77 proposal). 0^ Further combination of Lots 1 and 2 shall be required if the applicant fails to satisfy the City Engineer with satisfactory septic system site evaluation for said lots. The applicant shall execute a 30 ft. wide flowege and conservation easement along the existing Holy Name Cr'^k. Qt.^% The applicant shal^execute and deliver a road and 'Utilities easement, a developora ^ ^meowner's association agreement, articles of v* Incorporation and/or by-laws. ^ •» !liia. - >.i t 7. 8. «% •- ai 1 i I M ^m I MM t ■ -*■ *1- *•'.,... -. . * • _ - , •. * ^- I S?vfcW' ::’•' -V.. >' 5*ii:ijr4>i li. •- '‘*’ " r' /* ' 2^ ' riy i tlui pl«r:of JA9Cl£K(X)DV^>B0Oi«9ia;kCo i^i•etx.to <thc- folloirlng ^ , -.V rjs , u 7,1. <^^xedstloi^f * s 7>gre«awnt^’fotv zbadjiiif Tb« a£ores«id plat•shAir^b* filed with the.B«nepixi*:C - • /l-Offlce-on^or befoTe7.Septcnber.:13, 1978;vtogetber vltb^AVc^.^;;^^ .-.' •4^original4»Dpy.,of ^thienBeeolutlen, ^sad execuCed-ooplM^tt^imv^^ *g>^ '";r- -“»v:; * -.■ >, i-tf-utilities erne t/document, open space sand.,flflwsgeaeonsm«tto !gniii|^'t .<■ vvjsesseaienc ,-.laoo proceccxve covomui xncxwuag^a.clause^assiglW^ :''. 1^ malnteoaiMe responsibilities for the. private road* fr~ **fi't£'^?- . v> > • ria .-. i r*. .V.5 ■' a / !^/v'3. VTha privatr^'road, Outlot A, shall be hereafte r‘^ ' « • r •. 1 • r - v Road. Iff* V* . • • V — ■ • /r • > '/•♦• u. ; jThe/apprbvalj grantedLLh7«?thi's|R^ ' the*^date,Spe^f led tab application with Che CityTof Orono^or^suW! mw • I i \ * •' ->Vi • • > e • ' ♦ - • ‘ ^ '.yjrv9’fT'^ ■ ,. l;./ V-r^ ■* ’ '1 0. ::r^r.y'is rs_:s. *<<'*•'ae«a.j^^^’'5<1978 •V r* William B. Van Nest ATTEST; • * , ■■-»••';#** ^ . ; * V - - 1* ♦ * • #•• pp * • . ! " - J V*V»V*<. • •, -7 ^ -w r i ^ - j V' * \ A - ' I#*'* ^ '. * ■ * • h* ■ > 1 m >t . % ' ^ _ • *.* • . . - , ^ .,^ - a - r • «~ i--' . * IV ^r # ^ m m % I • ._ ^ .* <.»3L ^ < -mTJT. a ^1 xum # %* *•• • >y w* • , •« • • - *» • V r« « . — <• • • . — ««• • ' • «. v' - • ... ^ r-f» .' ^ V ,.^- •'IIM I k *•>* . i' -«. * % * > ^ • • ► •#- _•- * . # —-» '* V • ;■■■.. "• ;■ "•■ --U . ». - •• • ^ . •'-.,.••<» '*'# • • -• ^ f • •'*- *•■ ‘ • C ■I • --•• ¥T r • *' , J».-^ • . «• • . .•% *;.*►•.: • ^ ^ -|^.,T ■> • ~ ■ * '.,. • *, • >»^«''\...«< 4#'. • ■ ■• • - . . _. . . *k ' 1^ • ^mm . : ' -**. • 'iv *r-• -'A :•• '' >'’■;■ -•■'fcL' , -V - ^ -;. ^•'■••..;47--‘- ' • j **r ■'/.• *‘'S i ? ^ *"r .; : v. v'- - j,*' . * 7 2(.^ ..• J. • 3*^ r ‘4*. % ■ Tt?’ ''•“"’■ '^■' •'•'*'■' • • ' ' z^>:l.i * ': - f * A •.•'. '.H ~*. 4'*••*•-■ ' •4». « •M • . . ' ' >• I * • «Mt./ » • • • ‘i • ' » • -- ■ ^ •■'V '*'^.*< » • "\.•* # ;. 'V •'di • ■ ♦-• «■ V» • • i #-• ' ♦ % V i; ^ i; ► «~r J i ' *«: ^ V »: r •"' ’ %■• * -r*ri ■jc7. *.^wrt'y eat-*'- -i; w 34.024 MUiNlCIPAL CODE OF OROXO h" 34.031. rcblic. smi« ,!tii?nh'onTfxchaS^c static eluding but "“t lutiona, wells, and pumping stations skticns and eleetnca^ no building shall be !“f"'‘fbe found lot in an ■•R" Distnet. Pnor to compatible to the netgVboXo^ hfS located and thus will promote the gen- eral welfare. qj O-’t Grecnliouscs. Commercial greenhouses provided all outside <itn''R noerrutiem Areas. Private gun clubs, archcri' ranges, nd- in. s^aw«; si!; provided the area is fcr.eed and no part of the pnn- cipal use is less than one hundred feet from anj lou line. 34.027. Guest Houses. Guest houses, uses other than those listed as permitted. accessory structures and 34.02J5. rianued Ilcsideiitial .development. Limited to detached single family dwellings only. - - - .' -f* .>.- 31.020. Community Sto.«-cs. 31 030 K-IA: Acccssorv Uses. \Vithiu any R-IA Use District, no acccssoiy stnicturc or use of land shall be permitted ex­ cept for one or more of the following uses: S-1.031. Garages. Private garages and parking space. i docks. 32-10 S4.032. Pools, etc. Private sv.dmming pool, tennis courts, and pad- 1-1-68 1 f • r • -? • ‘ r. r'i /5TO 4^>' Ukr-wv • K*J V A * -‘ .'•A-.;*:*'; ViJ.’i^ . . vlUAM or eRONO iuwow i«u«r ‘" ■V-^v:: := '•:v Vi^ t.pucroii or MpaoMO atUrf •w#« AOOtfSf r/n d»tA a/- rwoNtwo. ‘ f * *.. y V19A0 Jr i (■ Mock AddJfton or Svbdhrtilon Pi.•• ^ ;. rj;-'- , ( . •* ■ • ■ V UMMiHPt. Bovorton K. MMIOtNO IOCAHON DIa. From Rood Dta. SMm Dia. lode DroliKigo VINmAflON AND UOHT foreo«Mo90 of floor Aroo Vonf. PoroofMooo of Ught le Floor AfM X A V/ 0 ' .♦•r.d • • •-“ .• V* COtOTtUenOM UNTRS 91x0 <4 /“V-^ location a'’- Src^c Span .r• ' 0 / -j* Fs* ■rickr Mid Brick Voooor Comont Block Wnt TYPI ConairwcHon Location 4 '*♦•» ^ POOHNOS " Ooprti ^ Wlddi l//o/t,n ^ Uoat Dopth ' POUNDAIIQN.Conatnidlon c-Q ttim tone T«NK* e« mumotai SIto Olaaonoo From WoU Contfrwetton • • <UP □l¥ “ v'l * • T ■ . ■ » • .*•/.< V. • • or. dr K.6 • Twi Floor Bteo Spodnp B>xo Spon OIAIMPIRO Ooplh Width Length V : ^ • HJfjf > :*-rV» NO. OP nupucis Typo '%v-AA^ PUMMIINO PDOIfin Garhogo Dfapoaol SInka t Both Toby JAaa.f td>0^ y* v ■' Jit •i^^v M Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator July 15, 1992 Proposed Zoning Code Amendment - Styrofoam Dock Flotation # '* >m-m As a result of complaints by lakeshore property owners and at the request of the Lake Use Committee, staff has drafted an ordinance providing for the elimination of non-encased bead type styrofoam used for dock flotation purposes. The problem with such material is that the styrofoam beads break off in chunks or individually from the styrofoam blocks, and float around the lake typically accumulating on the windward shorelines. This creates an aesthetic nuisance^ although the MPCA doesn't seem to think this creates any degradation of water quality. The proposed ordinance provides for a 3 year phase-out of unencased styrofoam used for docks. mIdst of Exhibits A - Proposed Ordinance Draft B - Letter from MPCA 4/10/92 , C - Product Literature on One Possible Alternative (This is not an endorsement) D'lscmssion The impetu ' for the proposed ordinance is the styrofoam bead accumulations wiwhich a number of lakeshore property owners have had to contend. Tb'. most visible sources have been fro Minnetonka Boat Works and Lakesid- Marina, with lesser amounts apparently coming from Windward Marina. The bead accumulations resulting in complaints have been mainly in Tanager Lake and the south shore of Maxwell Bay. There are likely a number of private docks also using styrofoam. h There are foam products on the market that are not formed from expanded polystyrene beads. Generally, these homogenous foams as urethane foam or isocyanurate foam, do not break down into individual beads or chunks of beads, and have not become apparent as a problem. Logic, then, suggests that styrofoam bead products either need to be eliminated from use or altered/encased to eliminate the litter problem. mm ■'M I* . ..f -rV . 4; 'v. .'.•t;>c- '"V '• ’W' .M, m '•■ f •.•.■■•' ' :v V- ';. «?IS ■■ >+'Memo July 15, 1992 Page 2 7^ 1^ The breakdown of the foam into individual beads apparently occurs either through ice action in the spring or wildlife activities such as geese, ducks and muskrats which like to chew on the styrofoam. The MPCA end the DNR have not concluded that ingestion of the beads a'^d subsequent elimination causes any problems for the wildlife. To remedy the problem, a number of choices might include: Replace the bead styrofoam with some other form of flotation. Coat or encase the styrofoam blocks in a protective covering which eliminates their introduction to the water. This might include some sort of protective spray coating, placement of the blocks within some type of bin or barrel structure, or even reuse of the existing styrofoam in bead or chunk form within some watertight barrel or case. The following comments from various parties, including Orono marina operators, are offered for Planning Commission's consideration; There are various grades of bead styrofoam, and use of the higher grades might reduce the magnitude of the problem. Replacement of an entire marina dockage system is an expensive proposition, and the January 1995 ".imeframe proposed is not realistic for the two marinas (Lakeside and Minnetonka Boat Works) which have recently constructed new docks supported by bead styrofoam. The 3 year phase-out is unrealistic, in that at the time a dock owner chooses to replace the flotation, entire dock sections must be done at once due to the high probability that any replacement product will have different flotation characteristics (the docks will have hills and valleys) As currently drafted, all private and commercial docks would be subject to the ordinance. Various parties have suggested that in addition to docks, the ban should also include any other floating structures such as swim platforms, walkways, etc. * •-k The 3 year phase—out language was constructed such that^ the City does not need to do an inventory up front. Rather, at any time after each incremental deadline a dock was found to exceed the maximum allowable proportion of styrofoam bead flotation, such dock would not be in compliance. In the event that a dock had multiple fingers or slips, for instance say 6 fingers, it would be reasonable to expect that 2 of the 6 fingers would be replaced each year, rather than 1/3 of each finger each year. (This question came up at a Lake Use Committee meeting.) Wm zjsm* ,v m >' Memo July 15, 1992 Page 3 | Issues for Discussion The Planning Commission should answer the following questions in determining whether the proposed ordinance as drafted is necessary and ^appropriate: 1. Should all future use of non-encased styrofoam for dock flotation be banned? Should existing users of such product be required to eliminate non-encased styrofoam? If so, what is an appropriate and reasonable time table for removal to occur? Should there be one final deadline date, or is the incremental reduction appropriate? Should the ordinance apply to private as well as commercial docks throughout the entire City? Does Planning Commission have any recommendation as to the degree of enforcement this subject deserves? i.e. Is an annual survey of docks needed (extremely time consuming), or would this be enforced only or a complaint or "catch—as— catch can" basis? Staff RecoBOnendation Planning Commission is advised to review the proposed ordinance and, if the ordinance is determined to be appropriate, recommend any changes which you feel might make it more appropriate, reasonable, and fair to both those who must ultimately replace docks and those who must put up with their litter. my. V..- Ufa ■ : -.I*, V; , ■ -m.Vm •• mmm -:*i Y- >• :“ '! ' 'via ORDINANCE f SECOND SERIES i*<DA.:».'-ii 1^1, •iJJ AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE ^ SECTION 10.56, BY ADDING SECTION 10.56,_SDB^ISION 17 (T) H’Vi V • .HiilVi'I r l||! . The City Council of Orono ordains as follows: ii PROHIBITING THE USE OP NON-BNCASBD STYROFOAM AS A DOCK FLOTATION DEVICE The Municipal Code of the City of Orono is amended by adding 4, Ordinance #______, Second Series: Section 1. Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subdivision 17 is amended by adding Subsection (T) to read as follows: (T): Floating docks as platforms. Because the disintegration of styrofoam dock flotation blocks leads to floating styrofoam beads washing up onto the shoreline, causing a visual blight on the shoreland landscape, and thereby creating a public nuisance, the use of non—encased styrofoam blocks or sheets for dock and platform flotation is prohibited subject to the following regulations: 1."Non-encased styrofoam" means any brand of expanded polystyrene beads molded into a block, sheet or other shape that does not have a permanent casing, covering or coating which would eliminate disintegration of the molded block or shee^ in ‘ndividual beads or chunks as a result of ice act -i : <':"'imals or normal activity by dock users. This ordinance applies to all new, private and commercial dock construction, regardless whether such dock is permanent or seasonal in nature, occurring after the date of adoption of this ordinance. The owners of any existing permanent or seasonal dock constructed with non-encased stY£of.£a.S! shall discontinue use of the non-encased styrofoam as a flotation device per the following compliance schedule: No more than 2/3 of the length of a given dock may be supported by non-encased styrofoam after January 1, 1993. No more than 1/3 of the length of a given dock may ^ be supported by non-encased styrofoam after January 1, 1994. No portion of any dock may be supported by non- encased styrofoam after January 1, 1995. a 1 The use of urethane foams, isocyanurate foams, or other types of foam flotation blocks which are homogeneous and which will not normally break down into individual beads, is specifically not prohibited. Molded or nonmolded expanded polystyrene beads in bulk may be used as a dock flotation device only when completely enclosed in a sealed container capable of withstanding ice action, animals or normal activity by dock users. ■■ ri; Section 2. Adoption and publication. This ordinance shall take ^ effect and shall be enforced from and after the date of its .4 passage and publication. Adopted by the City Council of Orono on this 1992, by a vote of _______ ayes and _______ nays day of fete"V ..... •4,- W,.-^ >••1 SQRO?' Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-3898 Telephone (612) 296-6300 .' 4 / ■‘L •;*■v< Ai* April 10» 1992 mn M«. Rach«l Thibolt Ulca Minnetonka ConeetVAtion District 900 East Vayzaca Boulevard Day2ata» Minnesota 55391 Dear Ms. Thiboltt You have requested the Agency position O" styrofoam. Me not aware of any water quality resultsStyrofoam. There Is esthetic pollution, especially on beaches, which results from the physical breakup of the styrofoam. In an Ideal situation the Agency would work towards a environment. However, in reality we have not pursued at the level of this particular situation. There are a number of reasons this.;■ i '• * dep\af uinnJon'vWchr? :^1urt^o“«e'm™!”bas defeated. 3 We have limited resources and staff and therefore have Issues with the greatest environmental impact. For ®*J“P ® septic tanks on lakes is considerable but virtually all reg carried out by the counties. V" ;-'s ■ In .uimary, while we favor local efforts to deal with this situation, we do not have the regulatory tools to support your efforts. Sincerely,> •’ (4*.aai4^ Harold J. Wiegner, Biologist AssesamfiHt and Planning Section Water Quality Division 1 V j ■"A t'-.I- - HJWijae^ fm '.M _________, . -sVae »• . .. i ‘Li I 7.^ v: c 7 % X w X .v: 4MM ^ ^ 5,a V5 5 — 9r ET y: w H S- cc 2, *— X 5. 2. r. X. o I/I O acao c ££. SJv:5. :jnc r; C X o Ml 3TT 3* A * ^ %c-n X MM ••5 54 w ^X^•w2 X MM • X X 75 i»^c X*2 0 0mm X 3*/5 X 3-k MM •3* <»■» n. oc X 2 fr «k • X cr X X «• « 5 K • # rf-* X « A /"i U. X •■M 4 “C c.ET c = o =: 7T z O ^ c: c - X =. -cr o ^ X“ •< or:; c X X- MM • Xv: c ^ X :£••« ^ • * ri — —. ^ i: iZ' ^ ttr* 025 c *< C ^ C 'X* 3 C ^ ^ ~~x-=r. x= “-G* =!c = — v: '/■• ^ "^ P -^ —. I—. n' n P - • — C. ^ n O — ^ SO Ml Oo ^ >• o > =; X— ^ X X ^ 5 5 < A T 7* ;5. —• ^ ^ 3 cr SJ XJ c; o C-cn 7T X r <c c X c < c c X r: 3 - C-r °d ^ ^ i . ^ w ^ ^ o o* ? ~ ^ S’ u C w ^c X X ^O c 3_ o X c dv: - c n =3 mi On rx C -r: £ =rt w “• Xw d 75 3 3 V E: C 3* <n?T •n C 3 ^ r 3 2 ^ ^ 53 r 1 i 54 X Xi»■* 3* X 3 C• X w 3 ?, 3 3 cr v; 3. illir 1 pM '•■'v \ \\ i:>™ i l\' 'Y.'Si * (■ v'Sa^ • • . ^ a. tf. a *5 or csi^ o o> o b ^-1 rf ^ ■> f 3 rjg ^ =*• s3 £- 3?* SfL i£- O ritfi S’ ^ 1. -S c ^ • ^ ^ iZ. ^ 2 32 C t?oo?r 2, s: i. s' (/> n < rb 3 cr. tinno 3 H3 crq t I ^5- SJ. 3•n <3n 3 rt> t/> •3 Oo c 3O 3- O\t. 3 35. ^ O 3: G 3E. 3 a 3 C/i (A. 9 c/5 li O 3n C/)c c CL- r> r& p o a. p 3s. o ^ 3 3 3 o 3 3 fD O 0 3 ==; CL -t 1 ^§ -rin o 3 o 3 3o 3 O 3 3 3- i *i 3 < S' 3 o 3o 3 if|f ^ <5. ^ pr < Oi w §. ^ ? S’ S. t/5 ‘ a • sy s'» In * S S|l:g.-I-:?i 3:1. a."^ i.'afijoSrsr s- 9*^ ? a § =ro 5 rc X O “ \ r- f - •.■ ..i o 3oCLe if uia '8 8 2 s 7b 1 ? ^ ~V» s s 1 Si?Ti: o S 2.G-Oq S’??ts^l-nso ^ n n Ul MM •2: a o* i/i •• • r V m i#i Si : ' . 4'}“r fi , - •\-)i V^: • ,.6^ ■t- ->."1 3 Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator July 9, 1992 '1^ #1746 Thomas and Margaret Lower 2630 West Lafayette Rd. - Variances - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances ~ 1.Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Lakeshore setback variance required for proposed addition to existing residence. Allowed =0 Existing =» 16' Proposed =38' Variance = 37* or 49.3% ; Hk i ■I Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover variances within 0-75' and 75-250' setback areas. 22,300 s.f.0-75' setback area = Allowed « 0 Existing per applicants' consultant = 3,993 s.f. or 17.9%. Existing as adjusted per staff's review = 4,387 s.f. or 19.6%* Proposed * 4,037.8 s.f. or 18.9% (addition of 566.8 s.f. or 2.5% of new structural hardcover with removal of 176 s.f. or .08% existing structural hardcover and 740 s.f. or 3.3% of non-structural hardcover) ♦Deck and patio shown at total area of 785 s.f., revised per staff review found at 1,179 s.f. Refer to Exhibit I. r 75-250' setback area = 31,900 s.f.i Allowed * 7, 975 s.f. or 25% Existing = 11,813 s.f. or 37% Proposed = 11,989 s.f. or 37.5% (if gazebo relocated in 75- 250' area) i'V List of Exhibits - A - Application Al- Applicants' Addendum B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Neighbors' Acknowledgment Forms E - Hardcover Fact Sheets P - Survey G - Elevations H - Proposed Site Plan I - Staff Sketch » . ! V. "J. ..A - I, ; % Vi . 3 ■ . . [ tit i i- - 0 IWT T • mm Zoning File #1746 July 9, 1992 Page 2 IV') ■ ■1 K»Description o£ Request Applicants propose a 26'x21'8" addition to the west and south side of the existing residence. Review Exhibits G and H. The addition will be a single story additionr continuing along existing roof line. Three-fourths of the house is located within the 75 setback area. Any grade level addition would involve lakeshore setback and hardcover variances. The only portion of the existing residence located out of the 75—250' setback area is the attached garage. Applicants claim if house is to be expanded and is to meet functional and aesthetic design goals# expansion must be at grade level. Vertical expansion would have a negative impact on the architectual design of home. i. In order to compensate for the 566.8 s.f. structural hardcover with the proposed improvement# remove 740 s.f. of lar ‘ ' ' ' _i_ a gazebo structure w area. To relocate tl also require approve factual findings. of additional applicants will Hardship Statement Please review Ex reviewed as follows: The only po are located Proposed in hardcover of Based on ex the structu east to the grassed lawi Existing st Shoreland R major struc except for i liirolal [•Hal .41% of the setback arcs laltfalal w wm k'' '■: iMs. Zoning File #1746 July 9, 1992 Page 3 li^^es for Consideration Applicants propose .05% reduction in 0-75* setback area. Review Exhibits E and I. Are there other areas of existing improvements that can be removed? 37% hardcover exists and 37.5% is proposed within the 75 250' setback area. Are there areas of existing hardcover within the 75-250' setback area that can also be reduced? a) Removal of non-essential portions of paved drive? b) 640 s.f. of landscape area underlain with plastic, c) Paved v/alkways or other accessory improvements d) Others. Any condition of appeal must include the request that hardcover improvements scheduled for removal be completed prior to t e 3^ " )■. -.'U p.: vVyff *'4d ’• '** y ' '^CP- f'- : -r ' -T•ft- I'lLfC? CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Pee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Pact Fees (Double application fee) #17 ROPBRTY INFORMATION Site Address L*J .A.A-F=>a.'/^ pT^ Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.)•2./. I in . 3-'^ ^-2-^ oo <h*f' ■ »■, Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired ^ _(month/year) r-T nc -oriiin Ul WMLflTU* jrkJ.Vvrz r>ccTrct jLitnifi^u vt I ikru i V^/VT'/'VV iiV)X V Vy/if i f‘L\i t^iicri' TiA t uL.1 icur •‘v^ AA• v.'V• • «• • • « wI Cf3^(do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. . . Present use of property: X residential _ _ _other(specif’y" ryc4'w‘C'iZ?v urv\'X ixVAZoning District:I V' VW.V fl ■* -APPLICMiT Ncune Phone (home) »• Nsune ______T'Mq/via*^ i- gT~_____ Phone (work) oS i'J/ Address: pJb City: O Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Naune Phone (home) Phone (work) '..r\ Address:City:Zip: t DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ O C \ Describe request in detail: ^ / y- 7^ ^ Cs^ s - c>Pf=ic. ~ A-^Oji-iCyp r'. ^ VARIANCES REQUIRED _____ Lot Area Setback: If Lot Width X Hardcover Lot Coverage Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore i??'-X Other (specify)_ _ _ BARDSHIP/DBSCRIFTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS ■SPWr^Jvtc Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:_ _ _ _ _ A TrA^^kL/V)£=A^T "_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -riiiir ' -- . *• (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of follo%H.nq information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for yoor application t:o be considered ccmplete; ompleted Application Form /ii\^^rtlfied Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain C.l_^hi s ■-" his list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 48-3271). lat Map (obtained with property owners list). jertificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include rdcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%’'xll" for reproduction ). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8V"xll") 6. \X^Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll"). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. jffll 8. __^Addi*-ional items as may be requested by City staff. ®i The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above Information has not been Included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. D O I Applicant's Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date C* 6 - f'a- OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of this request. X %■ Owner's Signature Date - 3- Applicant must have all siabmlttals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building fi Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. '4 ■t :• -A- t ’*/• T-'v N ..(• r» --' I,V ■• ‘ <irmwm (Jii^ / /4 ‘Cl)-. aJIy ^ V ••;:;■''^lil.^-*' ^r^ir^n%hfsw"fornr/ore^istlng^«si^^^^^^^^^ £?! an^removrand delicate outside of hardcover zone a screened * . ^ err fi" This would TSinovB 916 sq. . t. from tho harScover zone thus there would be a net reduction of hardcover usage of 34? ft. in the 0-75 hardcover zone. Our topography indicates that much Srainag4 takes a somewhat circuitous route to the SW and then Easterly to the lake. Existing struct,^e was built in was in effect. There have been no ^ kitchen remodel in 1985 Sich°did iToV'?ncroach beyond the existing building envelope.. -1. I .\J.,U7y%> / - I-V..nJt'' rV ;.|£; ‘/VJ)-, L- r • ■' * * ^ , j ^ • ,«t - . "-#♦ ^ '» 1^’-* ‘v: .*' • Jr.'T''v,/*rf»,f ^ f . ' .»•► - - •^ .. . .' -. t t v''^7^ o' <; (WU y7j ># •I '^f ■ -•..'O' *.': *.**'* V*. * • 'V .*•**• •^ • k* K 01 -t::.;., ^ .......... ^1^ •••*•*••*•. *..‘r - ••«TTTTtWf ■••*>*. IT* O .* ''-.^'1 "7 , • , ^ - -Or. ■• •*. it* ' V. N IHU (tS) ; tl 101 « u /15. V, ! jr-r.-V ^ m /1 1 1 /'>oV) / •> /" §• //^5 J 1 **m f A 11 / ^f f »*’1 v>V * •■5 II 5«r C ^ 0 " Iv. r« ^5 0. i**' %f 01 I ^ t , J <» £i \ \ (IS) -v . 'S. ■ •* \%K - ' I « \ wrt- .‘*ii>S 9^. .1.\.. -' l»»''/ ■ A-** A/ SfV- * ■f -C-v-.- '•-• 4 \ t ^ t , , ■^; A’ ,r v,"< \01 101 » li \C \ rrO-v'^^ “!\-v-.',t i;.-,'I-*' .r ^x**^*-^vv' \ ■■ r.i •! . : ■■ 1. •.■/.'■.■':• • - V- ■ ' ■ ' ■ , * * '-■ ' . ' > ^7 r #.• • _ ✓/ \ «>^ - .■ '♦jair' Kift-.^] / ?4-^-';>r.vt*»!?is’<j¥ Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form I (we) [print name(s)] Cl c Gy Ov^Ayfc /Tie [print address] -. Lou / /ic-S H , 4-Vio nronosed improvement or proposed use of the P have reviewed the Pl^ns^ fo^ ^ also referred to as Land Use _ ^ property located at ^ —-------- ------------ Application No. a. j *.Ka+. <1 Ti Avecuting this acknowledgement, I (we) am I (we) understand t)iat in exe disapproval of the property or use (are) not asked to declare ®PP'°'' council^that I (we) am (are) aware of but merely to confirm proposed neighbor's project or use the improvement plans and that the prop v requires Council approval. E6^operty Owner Date > i ^(TTf/fdJL S'' ^^-9 Date roperty Owner Z.Oir' (print address] ■ have reviewed the plans for the P”P°-^i“P-J,^rr\fL«??o ^as" Land Use . nropertv located at I (we) understand that in ^the property or use (are) not asked I (we) am (are) aware of . fhri:rro^rent;\^^^^^ requires Council approval. ‘•‘i I H(mc r^LTzrZrirTT /Veir ' L - OlcM,lA ar'M property Owner U . prop^ty Owner -‘xf lou have any “rut^Lrents^^to th^Bu^lliV* d afleast 10 da% prior to the scheduled meeting date. ^ > > . : i3 " / t •/ ' ^ ii m P’J kJ i \ r:*v W rr MJac?Prop«t:y Owners' Actoowleagement Form I (we) L '-fAA A / [print name(s)] of [print address] L.O-T / “7 4« ___ ___!r. ». vs “v(sSv■R^.r,^;:rrr.r.\.1... property located at ----------------■ “ Applicati®^ No. _cation wo.-------- ^x^rr 4-Vii^ ackrow XBdQfixnsntr I (W0J I (we) understand that ^ disapproval of the property or use (are) not as)ced City Council that I (we) am °g but merely t^fthe proposed neighbor's project or the improvement plans an requires Council approval. 1 (we)tV/vlAA>^ 7. te«3C [print name(s)l ~ [print address] ' 3K. iprj.no have reviewed the ®" property located at -------------------------- Appli ation No «■ I (we) understand that in ®='®®“'^^^i approval"of^the property or use iare) not asked to <3®®l“®'®Pf/°?t^^ I (we) am but merely to confirm proposed neighbor's proDect or use the improvement plans and that tne p p , requires Council approval. property Owner property Xf you have any ^^bmft yout^comten'ifs “^^ " jdik. :t ■ I;‘ .«C# 17“^ mu '■''-?5SI^Hr^7 V-^vY?C.-^ Mr. Ralph D. Burgess, 204 Inland Road Plymouth, MN 55447 Jr. Deeu: Ralph, ■’•r. r-f‘'.'y' 7:*‘ I proposing a bedroom^storage addition to my house at 2630 West Lafayette Road which will require a hardcover variance. I am enclosing a copy of the plan and plat showing proposed addition together with Orono*s "Adjacent Property Acknowledgment Form". I would appreciate your signature on the enclosed form and return ([tome. In the enclosed envelope. Your signature does not imply aSp^val or disapproval but merely that you received the notice. sir LY»iiijae • .* .7, 'i y ■ "■*. ‘^1 ’I ‘^.PL: js M,:i§ r my"'; \ '¥ ' &M. fine ncmoma^jr: ^ Mi m4:«; 1 fc-V m-- ■ ''i '■’^‘4 »,';A m Wmmmm '*c , ...: fF -;?' •• * v ' ^ my , , ■ 7.^' 'IR-V''- .rt* ■ T>tKt _____ p.oi»«y »=u.«i.as-«« fp™ t 1 (we) (<^>VUK H>— 1.--------—[print adc^res.s] - (print name(s)] have reviewed the plans £or the erred^ to as Land Ose property located at -------—------------^ Application No. -k'W .X - ' Z V*OW.JLwa4 I ~ . this acknowledgement, I (we) am . I (we) understand or disapproval of the property or use (are) not asked -ity Council that I (we) am (are) but mere’y to confirm I"^e proposed neighbor's progect or use the improvement plans and that the p p requires Council approval. 2<Property Owner R 6 u r * * •» Property Owner *********^ tjO^otuy^) ’i (we) M of m (print name(s)l (print address] property located at --------------------— ^pplication No ................— I (we) understand that in gapp*otal"of^the property or use DUt merely to confirm proposed neighbor's project or use the improvement plans and that the p^op ^ requires Council approval. •*- « .-sb* n i Property Owner It:jiiii property owner ifLi 2 a. ^>iA pttv in the review of If you have any information that ^y to the Building s itif ■■} ^ C 1^ M..-'. HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (ciPXLE ome)Q3~75J^^ 75-250' 250-d00' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone ’ ------------------------ ■-♦pjwm ' • *1r: 1 /.Sri1 Ui- *‘t'. >•■ .,f ..• 1/70 'A ^ S.F. LENGTH WIDTH ■j ‘ • V,' . S.F. X _I- S.F. \i 'f* V S.F. *.«« • •• • JC/f //; / y. ?S.F. Mi- Garags V __S^F. c. D rivev /ay '■/o Ask S.F. S.F. D. Sidewalk _S.F. ■M; A S.F. r : iibc ^ATIC/ 3ec:< z 6 X y r /■ 1- 5' • ■•• •S.F. ■■.. i'/ 6 6 0 S.F. ■ 4s F .'Landscape areas UNDERLAIN 3Y , . PLASTIC • SHEETING' 79^S.F. -S.F. G. Other V. 7 . S.F. m.1 /^.y 6. s. V. r__ X ■X S.F. V X ? 7.1 5V /J .S.F. "Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone S.F. soot S.F. I! ? ^ ~B 2Z yoo X 100 /7.?0 t.'f;t i t- .........., i^A». .-. . . . *< • - i‘ - • “'• .y,'^ SETBACK zotis: (ciscLE otiB)75-250' 250-500' 500-1000 cXiSTillG Hardcoves ui ZotiE ■wrr.... HARDCOVER CALCULATIOM WORKSHEET r~ LENGTH WIDTH /y. 3 - X /23 Pali E. Garage X . D riveway D. S I DEWAL.K ^ P» :iPl-- k £. gATIO/ z. c y. r crv ' W L« «%Ji ■ m .ja l!!Zr> ^ V . v-4^ » fIDSCAPE AREAS UNDERLAIN ?^AST,C-. • SHEETING*• • • frr^j // /O’. / '/. s. y. .r X "X V X s.z 1 x-1 v-’-’-'-v;. Total Hardcover in Zone CTAL Property Area in Zone ati 1/70 S.F. . ^■■ S.F. ♦.*S.F. S.F. / ^ S.F. ___S.-F. 'yo S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F, / Z- 5 ........S.F. 6 60 S.F. 7^6 S.F. -•S.F, S.F. S.F. 5V /3 /S S.F. yyyf S.F. ^2*, 300 i S.F. 4 [~B~1 2Z ?00 X 100 • 'it • ••« ••«* .• . -Ml •- ■;• ♦ • *^ i r-rir A. ■ House- ........ S¥lf: '■ HARDCOVER CALCULATIOH WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' Existing Hardcover in Zone w • # ^ 250-500' SCO-ICQO' 7/0 S.F. LENGTH WIDTH S.F. S.F. t; I fCMBt S.F. S.F. 30. Z ZV. 2.7 7/S.F. Driveway » • »r«S.F. S.F. Sidewalk _ • i S.F. 1 r 3 20. t ■ t'L ^ATIO/3eck aC'0<. - - F.Landscape 1 AREAS UNDERLAIN BY ... PLASTIC SHEETIN.Q.. X K \ X <r. y A"(r S.F, 2. •5 •f ?. ? • ro ■ /a^S.F. //7 S.F. ■ 2Z S • F • „ S t ? c&uttf m 9o S.F. raAj 7^ X‘ ^ • 7a V a. s V o . S' V/ 5 2 S.F. /Of '/O - // V V ^ ' A ._'■•<■,I i ■ Li 1 ! tr.,..*, j ■Mr WJ ■ T 'fir ! •^ 1 *..■' 1 ' : ■ K . j I tU-: ■,.J r'^^TSSW Wm!5v5vi:c * .%1^ i-: ■^ ■' i ' '•7. ■- - ..mi icti»ric*i !^ A »« mt IS ^fti. ^r»m «ii4 *‘#ir i«l '** n:»i5*. >9f tSast «’<4* •'• Av4 M ja> *' -•* ■ t • < jyri 5 ^ ^ "'W'■ ■■ ! ■ i- , * t:^ •^»• 4^|.*, mnn*\ ra*ir» *n4 h»f« Ca-»a* ii X ••I r«*t«"t *.» %'»»• «•/ •l*‘4*‘ i ar tacmeAPtatl. • : Iroa :‘-ar*ar fawad ;; '.jil '4;r- ■ y I • V '.', [y. .i,j.'/. r ;-.7'. r'''-‘ -'. V % f. t ',-'• *7t‘ ■ • »»•»•1 •••a I I 1 ! 1 MM r* ! ■■ •^'1t1 1 « Ui t i Xjs8^::'«^liwiiBclu A>^ > •*ta niy'JL'^yA; •' k:’»' ;*•!. 6U^f?4MU >i ‘k.* IM U«r* «• Mar •••tm ** fcfc —^ ■ •tl • - • # 'm^- :^:ii r **' I i^- m' ..:. -‘.si fpw uv> '.t-' '■ V V":^i m .*• ii*—i . ».•. ij - '> ¥os V- "*^'.' > .- From: ’ *uA . Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator - /i< /V. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator July 9, 1992 m ^ W'% #1747 John O’Sullivan, 2420 Shadywood Road (O'Sullivan's)- Renewal Variance/Commercial Site Plan - Public Hearing The application was originally approved by Council on May 13, 1991. Applicant proposes no change from the original application and still seeks approval of the following variance: Section 10.40, Subdivision 6 (E) - Side setback variance. Required Existing Propot-^'^. Variance 15' (adjacent to B-4 lot line see Exhibit A) 18' V or 46.6% ■ :>. Section 10.40, Subdivision 6 (P) - Review of fence/wall standards for B-1 district. Fencing reouired shall be no less than 6' in height or evergreen hedges required adjacent to residential lot lines. No specific standards or limitations for fences or walls adjacent to commercial lot lines are addressed in the current code. Planning Commission members in the original review were asked to make a recommendation concerning the need for additional plantings along the west lot line to minimize impact of structural encroachment. Based upon the higher elevations to the west and the combination fencing of retaining wall and fence will already minimize impact. The current and proposed fencing is reviewed as follows: r,‘M %Existing setback * 7' Proposed setback * 5* Existing height » 11' Proposed height <■ 11* (consists of 4 1/2 to 5' retaining Ww walls that support adjacent cut into bank with approx. 6'high fencing placed on higher elevations contiguous with FWBI property to the west) '■'yy m»f Exhibits - L - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners Iiist D - Floor Plan E ** Elevations F - Site Plan G • Gustafson Report H “ Gustafson Sketch of Required Drainage Improvement nr ■ > ■ . V-1 W i ■-iS^..MI»; I:':. Zoning File #17 July 9, 1992 ci* Page 2 yV' yo,-M;;* '•-;•• :v;vy. ,^.., ^ - * ■ ,J p . -*'?r li I - Survey J - Zoning K - Resolu L - Planni M - Counci ■4^ %. ■m •iHhi ■■» -VliH Reviefir of Renewal Af^licationl1^' As already noted above^ the applicant proposes no change from the ..v&^fPtirigina 1 application reviewed in 1991. Review Exhibit K, Resolution % 1* #2964 that sets forth the special findings and conditions of Council's approval* The original staff memo of 7/9/91 has also been enclosed for your information. The building staff has been in contact with the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and they have advised that they want to review the specs and plans for the new car wash to determine if additional SAC units will be required. In 1987, at the time of the major expansion of the original Navarre Auco, applicant was charged seven SAC units. Applicant should also be fidvised that the City is in the process of reviewing the current sewer unit charges against the property to determine if an adjustment shall be necessary as a result of the intensification in water use. ■ -^*4 fe- ".M: m. • - ‘jiC m fr. ■ ‘ c . . •m:m mfi: fjp .. - V j ft 'c^ 1/ mm mmmmm ■■ 'iiiiiW- H • VV-^ ^ y- Vv! WW-mtm wi* ‘•1^ : ^ .' ■:' V i'. • * -* - m: mt 7 .-V • -f-..kf A. mm h-yJi ^ aiJ ^ V;=: V II I'ltiB r. ^ 9 . ■J’. - . r y;.7XT-^-W^^ jW\7Ti :<, . ■ •• •> ■ ' .••' ■ ’-I ^ Mayor Peterson 6 Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley ^ Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson !•- :■••. ■ Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator April 8, 1991 ■ ^%P»^rtlxient Ordinances - “rm #1635 John O’Sullivan (O'Sullivan’s at lIa^^rre), 2420 Shadywood Road *“ Commercial Site Plan/Variance Public Bearing m Section 10.40, Subdivision 2 - All applications for building permits within B—1 Retail Sales District are su review and approval of the Planning Commission and Council. Applicant seeks approval of a 10'x25 ’ concrete block equis:»ment room and storage area to be constructed along east wall of car wash structure. pi Section 10.4C , Subdivision 6 (E) - Structural setbacks.n >■'1^ -i- >. Required » 15* (adjacent to B-4 lot line see Exhibit J) Existing * 18' * Proposed • 8* Variance ■ 7’ or 46.6%.r Section 10.40, Subdivision 6 (F) ^Review of fence/wall or walls adjacent to commercial lot lines. ■m- #WI Existing Setback » 7' ; * ^ Setback = 5' Existing Height • 11' fwr:^- . , jyym Proposed Height - 11* (consists of Ah to 5' retaining ' 4t 0-- ^ * Vf&v. List of Sshibits walls that support adjacent cut into bank with approx. 6* high fencing placed on raised grade adjacent to PWBI property) !► .tJf. h L ■ w.m-v M. ' ■ Vr^-‘ Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Floor Plan Exhibit E - Elevations Exhibit P - Site Plan Exhibit G - Gustafson Report Exhibit H - Engineer's Sketch Exhibit I - Site Plan/Survey Existing Facility Exhibit J - Zoning Boundary :ij- :-'Vi ' A Zoning File #1635 April 8, 1991 Page 2 of 3 • ■ ^ '^Vjt ft Review of Connnercial Site Plan - i ‘■1 The 10'x25‘ storage facility is needed to provide additional area for equipment needed to upgrade car wash. Mr. O’Sullivan has advised that the new system will allow the r^°val of the cleaning brushes and the installation of a w^h ^igh pressure chemical cleaning system. "needed to^servioe ?^iV^??p“'or«r%rs^':“‘TSe%^t^^^^^^^ win also serve as idditionn storage area for the entire facility (not storage of additional goods but maintenance type equipment;. Review of Application #958 - prope?t"y “tT\^^^n?/n\eicrli:^e/?u\onlr3i ^“pe"rt*y ha^v^ ef"l^ive"lV."" Th\r\^"^^^^^^ been - accidents as a result of the applicant being to maintain th^two curb cuts close to the intersection °f C°“"ty “ and 19. As a patron of O'Sullivans and ®taff member, I never noted a problem with parking at the facility has the City received complaints (parking stall variance gr #958). ^ Rl^iew of Current Application - nothing in the permit file that provides the current staff with anv background on why the car wash was not MouirSl sprinkler system. The building departr.ent will ask that th^concrete blo^^ Lructure be sprinkled and at the same time install a system within the car wash. The Building advises that the cost to include car wash is minimum because lines have to be extended from auto repair through car wash. The applicant seeks setback variances for the addition. This setback is sought from the north lot line of the FWBl The Institute is located 100+’ from theInl/.djaUnt structure is a sarage which was installed by^.e review. W structure appears to be 25-30 as it There is no other suitable area to install the facility as ir must be adjacent to the car wash structure. The existing grade ai«na the east lot line minimizes the structural impact as the elevations at the FWBI lot line are higher than ®^ 2l2v2tion. Fencing will minimize the impact of the 12 high structure. jw . '•Ml ^ ' i .AlJ r^ ■ •V,'^4v i! Zoning File #1635 April 8. 1991 P2ge 3 of 3 The existing cotton trees will be removed as a result of these improvements. Applicant may be asked to provide some evergreen plantings within the east side yard where fencing and retaining wall have been located closer to lot line. ^ Will existing gra e and privacy fencing structure be enough to minimize visual impact of the encroachment of addition? The roof and exterior proposed concrete masonry block will - -* - -j. Theeie 9 A ^MP AM ww iv m 9 be consistent with exterior of car wash on east side.0t3 WUU2>JLS> L.CA1U W J. WAA ^ wv w -ft. -fc. w*. - -- - -- - - - - - -, - existing east wall is 18* from the side lot Irne. The proposed storage addition will be 8'. C01 Please review Exhibits G & H for the Engineer's review ents. His recommendations have been included in the staff option for approval. options of Action - - Denial, l^f variance setback application is to be denied, what other options can you recommend to applicant? Can upgraded equipment be placed above car wash structure? % Approval. To approve John O'Sullivan's request for a building permit to construct a 10*x25' storage/equipment structure on the east side of the existing car wash to be located 8* from the side lot line instead of the required 15', subject to the, following conditions: ^ Applicant to install a minimum 3' wide bituminous swale providing positive drainage to north from south parking lot. Swale to be sloped away from building at a 1/2 foot slope. I • jf-f. .1 2. Options on request for evergreen plantings along east side of new addition: required or not required? 3. Upon application for a building permit, applicant to provide building department with more detail on retaining wall installation (i.e. cross profile, type of support, etc.). 4. Addition shall be constructed of similar exterior jBiaterials used with car wash structure. 5. The new addition and car wash are to be serviced by an approved sprinkler system. . :■ ' V 'm. L ' ^^ ^ ’'-am:m ■c«HS^,‘■'., v4ii ■' '■ 4.r ’ "iH;m ,vu ^^;-:<;;vVyy--v:, IP®..'■!SfiS,:7 . - vvi i. • ■•'IP*: :<■■- . . • :»■ Wil •:Vs ' - <>m P*^** ' ■I ; • ■■ .••■ 'i * ' ’i>uv-.*; ii Wm-: ^ m Zoning File April 30r 1991 Page 4 : ■ I'if ; y . ;^;: ;v ^ -V- Adi^tional Cooments and Planning Coomission RecoaniMidation - John O'Sullivan was asked to explain why the additional area on the top. In addition to being an eyesore, it would impact the integrity of the design of the structure. If the was to be placed within the car wash there was always the <3anger that the sensitive computerized equipment could be damaged ny water. The high water table and ease of access restricts ^®® ° lower areas. Placing the structure to the east side of the building would minimize the visual impact from both roadways and from adjacent Fresh Water Institute. In consideration of the condition that would recyiire landscape/plantings along south side lot line water Biological Institute, the Planning Commission determined no need based on the placement of a privacy fence and the higher elevations of the Institute's property. The Planning Commission rec • JMM» ‘the bIs: 'y5?^“co.!:^iAo2^ addition and approved the commercial site plan for O Sullivans. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the Planning Conunission*s approval recommendation. m fa^’’;sV.'k i’ ,v a M -'W W"'-! ^■m ■ y- ■ly. ■ * piiq, ^.5 :./ ir- ■:’:.KU '7. • # CITY OF ORONO - VMllAHCB APPLICATION m m gaA*->fc^ r-V" /# /# • • / r? ^ y )ii^ • i ^ ■! .*■ : :‘A. • Initial Application Fee $175,00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) r x y y * r ^I f u*f I ^irr-MUi- i/# i luu < 7^ /*! ?•#*^ ww VW'VVV T "ry A akif 'ft • • • • « 111« I «I fVCTi* »• .’A.1.A Jl i/V'« VW Tf < /*•} AAf U AVV#VV• • vu*^. , 'kv . - 4 •-*• f ? • • • f *V» f f • » ?V •'fTi:-rw-u‘V' u wvi PROPERTY INFORMATION .••V” ^ T'C'/C-. l/bV 4./ / < ~ > Site Address ADV6<^*^c?/> /ft> Property Identif, Number (P.I.D.) ^0 - //7 2 3- ' > ' ^ •> 1 Attach legal description to application if not li '• included on required survey. Date Property Accuired (month/year) ■ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of *:> • Present use of property; Zoning District; il~ { i-'V:: APPLICANT H~LC 3">'i j:''■t';;-Name G '.5:t-C u t- t U H -v^ Phone (home)_ _ _ _ Phone (work) ^ Address: L^/^iT OWNER (if different than applicant) City; Zip: ^ Phone (home) P Name Phone (work)m Address: __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ City;Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail ; (X^p^iJPVTt^ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area » v/^ Setbac)c; Lot Width _ / Side Lot Coverage Front Hardcover _ _ Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify).',S -"'i1 BARDSHIP/DBSCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS ■t* .V Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements; pru^..rT^Tiv-^ -» T^- .U 4 '' ,l^;.^'.ss<3^'4TV<:v; (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of •>•**€ follovincr information must be submitted by the application date in order for yotur application to be considered ccjipleteg Completed Application Form ___^Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%”xll" for • reproduction ). >5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8Ji'’xll"). 6. __S)cetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%’’xll'*). 7. ___^As an addendtmi to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 'kl 'r-M iA 8.___^Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above infomation has not been included. I* A/; APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature 01/Date <r / ONMERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga ­ tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature 1 Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month.* Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Ccnmission and Council. If an applicant is tinable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building fi Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. *1 ■ 1 f,m I it^ '' \V i}^: pip :*>■.m.-' r'• V ,-vJi' 'i - ‘-1 '■• %; ■ -:> V-A-* • *•' •• « f-i TZ ry ^ o i* O ao C3»-< X c ^Ni -3 r- wt »• ^ >• %/% ^9 -4 o C 3 o ► r- f rr ^ 9<m "■> f I:..:W.^-; . » •V.. W'm ■ juia Bsr >• r^ r- > •2 3 S cr f j« c% 2 -< w V C c5*-\^c/i^rna*- ^ -4 d O O O » M •41 -n n H . ■ ' ' ;■ t- i.\ ■ ■ ■■ ••' . V - -'-'V .-‘Vt • ^ ■: ■ !7/ f dii&i.i'' '. toy ./■. ••»v.> 1 3 ■a o 3 o w •3 O C trf CP r- O arj -3 -4 tn *p n ri 30 r- w4 rj S C 3 o2 X►<> •^ > t/l M ^ n r* m (/I •« ^ C o :r ^ i/« o -4 m o I V.-I ► -3 30 IM -> X 1/) ^ Oi -- O f O 0 0"3*-«*- m aj m 21 ^ •3 n 30 m -4 v/> -4 o •< O o M as A««i' m C/1 r--< V‘**< t^;v-v.:;: ;.c, -. V i s ■ -^ • J .'.■ , ■vS5S• O m n 1^^ r 3 ^ 9 9 «4 o u« *0 0 0 3 f J 9 f O Q #•! m U1^ 5 ^ ^ o O O 33 o rs* f:: t iffik. 2 3 CA O rv O=ssis in o 2 c/i »« 3 3 «4 2 «4 Vt Q 2 OI > • V? ^ 2 ^ 6 ^X« «4 XI -4 O ^ M Cl o «ff c VI OI r* 31 3 ai*m r* % «4 5 *• • :.y'-L» -a “'t «,f*„ -if C‘^’ :'^v I } I / L-flUi -ri V •:^ - ■ i:;r- -4 O -? 2 >• :: -JX :f o ^ fn a • 31 X -4 >• ^^20 O 30 C3 2 33 S3 m 2 O < »P o ui O O O f4 9 < X' r» 33 !N >o o o o ^XI n m o "^Si 1 H »• VI c/l 2 tj n m ^ I O ^ 2 M • ^ 71n o c5 •-m ffi g M n n o r» i-i XI o 2 2 0 0 -4-4 Mm m X? XI VI VI •>,«.' ■ ^ n •- »- o c4 O (/I C/l rsj CP < -4 -H ► XJ X^ » O 2 2 VI f'a 2 7* ^ ► O m Q «4 «4 I 3 ^ VI M 2 VI O O 2 ^ '"sesSOiVI n n VI o o o p •« M *4 *n Q ••o a ___5 — ^ ^ ^02 f*i m 2 O c. c. o Vi > O >• >» CP< X a a ^ W M M VIa o e o VI ppa e o o o w I MM m0 5 fi«S5 S S M -4 Vi '■i '■%., ; j--=:(^ •' o T: *\> r-« o M > M a a ^ o ^ o i: a: ViM — i--» X^ > 2 2 O -4 »• M > >• cr t „____VI*-2 ^ 2n* a a o I •4 M -4 M «H M n Vi VI rn 2 2 1“VI •-• x^ Vi a M 2 ^ 41 O m•- 2 _ o ^ a om in ?inaa< o m fp g o w in a cn c 5 n 2 > > m-* Wmy^i • .' .T ,.f -to ..V- ,*• ,n' mm / / c k&^i r ■ ’ / ii \K; i«ns;.:,;aJ 37 pi. y ■-> • ,> i ***^-W'- IL'V.'I m m-. ■V' : ■ .•*»«• i‘- ,. t » •■’>-,. - * - r . i iSXi'sr^. ^^i<SL E<j^> 3-t?r S :W^,>;.mF I ’ ■*’ *s«!:;v ’^4' .: ■$l V t * r^r/>N|'f : .<i./ » • jftiAtifej A r / / / ^4: ;77;- v:;y ■'V?:*:tl^ r7- '■■■•. V ,'' r £XISTW<S- WAUU <• •• • V a /^LU '?!i 3* •^**<k b>~h. ^aW ‘4; V - _ p'I. -; ..• f ■i|< f m ^ 5* ; ' - • ' . k/‘ ■ • ••' •.w. *•' ^ - v/i- -• ! , ••-r-:••--.iv •■ f V * ' //. . .. /-v ' V:;7 • • :v7 •.. *..:• •>••; ' /.•• ♦• - *..•:/ *••*.• ; ' % Z • • r-v • ■r' "•X b o ;^ ■ V- r X ^f •jfc:-V^r- ^ ;\>i .'\\t^_%7> /■//• H «t CITY of OKONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITV COUNCIL NO. 2964_ _ _ _ _ A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO municipal ZONING CODE SECTION 10.40, SUBDIVISION 6 (E) FILE #1635 - »v Shadywood Road^within the^City^^f^o attached (hereinafter theonaujfwwwv.4 ^ legally described as property"); a-^d WHEREAS, the applicants have applied^to hhe^Ci^y^for a variance to Municipal - 10'x25' concrete block 7e) tS permit the =°h=“uction^ of car vash and addition to house equipm side of "existing structure to "Itfef 8n°S/O? th^rVurred 15' from the side lot l.ne. y -+ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Otono, Minnesota; FINDINGS 1. ■ This application was reviewed as Zoning File *1635 ja • n«-l Sstl^S BilSinssS 2. The property is located in th District. I 3. 'fheorono Planing =°^|^^^d"pproval“l"^ sSdf st^a^ variance based upon the following findings. A) Additional bectuse*"of ^ aoce” and water%able problems. CAAiWfc --------------------- C) The =°“P"herized equipment to moisture if it “””trbe“loc“a?ld caTwIsh structure. Page 1 of 4 j:- / \ *■'/ Iv'. r.N- fr- • */ •••,•*♦•••* ' ^ * • . , •• •• .• . - '..-^ • ■• >v '‘ -N■ .V • • ■• .?3 *«■' ‘ -V'-* v:.,-; V *■. :• . •*/'•-.\vV ‘'. "'‘a * • .* •• • • ♦ •» . :r\ r ‘ \ . •V. Hi .1 V*. i/ .7: •• ‘■- ••••^. V. • • i , • ^ /• « ». 'fe, \ «• r* it r » .T^f T"* »* " * ■ ■' • * 1 * V-A.v}'?’-'• ►■ if' :mm • * i^? < '/• - CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2964 _ rLdw^y" Ife^usrcf of structure on property. 4 The Citv Council finds that the conditions existing on tks property are peculiar to it and do not apply tS IthM property in this zoning district; that granting the variance woLd not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to viK/^r»-inrr nrooeiTtv* would iiot merdy S6rve b. Soi?enieicl to the aPPli«"ts, but is.necessary to Sec^7strrto%«s«vra “substJn\iV''p”P^^^^ ?Sle^\="SrihrL:?ng'co^%\"nd“"mprehensive Plan of the City . 5. The City Council has considered this the^Planning including the findings and recommendations of the Plann g Jommissfon, reports by City thi h/alth!applicants and the effect of the variance on the healtn, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findin^gs 10'x25» addition to the east side structure, subject to the following condition . ^ia l*e'’'’p\^"“d\%f pot it^vV “ra\^ parking ”t. sSale to be sloped away from building at 1/2 slope. wall installation. 3. Addition shall be constructed of similar exterior materials used with car wash structure. I 4. The new addition and car wash are to be serviced by an aporcved sprinkler system. Page 2 of 4 ‘i.'If? *■: -rt •rrM " *fHQr ' . . ‘ ■ -r '■ t • li CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2^6^- - - - - 5. Authorities granted are permissive only and must be Council approval, or this within one year of the date 13, 1992). variance will expire on that datr _ . i+.v> anv of ■*’he terms and rrlnreS^rerrit'af/siarbrpunishable as a „isde.eancr. . 3 ^ ^ ^ Xm ^ ^ ^ 1 -Jii 7. The of this resolution and on behalfhereby agree to the terms of assigns, hereby of themselves, this resolution in the chain ofagree to the recording of this resux title of the property. i. 'Sullivan ss.STA^ OP MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The f°/egoing instx^ent vas^ac)^^^^^^ m" this 13th day of May, 1991, by Orono, a Minnesota of the City. • ■j :| -":4^ f- ■' 5cir- mw'-'^SLc- ,V- ■ fota^"”P^2bTic Page 3 of 4 ‘-Hr*- . V - r —^«-<«7«Fv-=- - -' AL». ijv= Ai-f^V.:- - ’ .T- r t- ORONO PLANNING CCr-lMlSSION MEETING HELD APRIL 15, 1991 i ‘ :; '4',^W .aiiA (#5)ZONING FILE #1634-i-lAUS CONTINUED ^ a-,« ^ There were no public ccrrjnencs regarcinc rr._s , a— Kelley*closed the Public Kearinc at 7:40 o.m. k-, I. «as moved by, ^fol^Iveri^'^TeTe^hoU-'^eSec" ,,, ZiUTcis blsefon th'e six hardships -.d^noced in Macusrh's April 9, 1991 raemo. Ail votec aye. MOwior. ca- -e-. (#6)ZONING FILE #1635-JOHN O'SULLIVAN i ERWIN SMITH VARIANC^^^rS^ SITE PLAN REVIEW-PUBLIC HEARING John O'Sullivan was present. Kelley opened the Public Haaring at 7:08 p..m. ."-r Mflhus'-h reviewed the issues involved with John O'Sullivan's request for a ^^5'_ concrete^ Mabus-h'^'^Aoril Mabusth asked Mr. 0‘Sullivan if he wo7ld explain why additional storage could not be provided on top or below the existing building. ■ ■■ ,'V< ■"a- i-r ”•“? E|S be more cost effective'to add onto the exterior^ of ^he^ “uilding, m:is?ure"*’rf thl* comp^te^ied eguipment is stored within the car wash bay." '■■ '■■■„•There were no comments from the public on this matter, and Kelley closed the Public Hearing at 7:15 p.m •i' r Kelley asked Mabusth if the City had received any comments from the Freshwater Biological Institute. Mabusth replied, "No, t.he City has heard nothing from them for screening. ,, . "At the most, we will be removing one oluc^ our air conditioning and heating systems, two or three (Jr ■ a ^ • / 1' -• ■ - 8 - tmm. J j e' - - ORONO PLAJI^IING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 15, 1991 (J6,ZONING FILE nS35-0'S0LLIVAi. ? ERWIN SMpH CONTINUED ' ' Tlie other trees wixi -e..iain.tines a year Mah.is-I acd»d that the City Sncinear has recotrjr,endec removal or- thrcr^cn^cortrees because of the new construction. . It was moved by Johnson seconded by_Cohen to re=or^.end rIttff :;t;o::;;;dtti^-u .3. t. and .s. All voted aye. Motion carriea. (#7)ZOmNG FILE *1636-STEVE TIBBETTS u 1810 SHADYWOOD ROAD «a,,r,ria/~'im aj4sr-the-fact variances-public hearing Steve Tibbetts was present. ':r At 7:26 p.ra., Kelley opened the Public Hearing. Mabusth outlined the issues noted in her April 15, 1991 memo relative to Mr. Tibbetts' application. Johnson asked Mabusth what the total hardcover is for the 'V entire lot. Mabusth stated that the coverage for the entire lot is ^.^l^pproximateiy 28% ■""C ^ ^ ^ Acrr*=‘^d that: there were The Planning Z tle prooirtv that could be removed. They iL^ound space and eliminate the need toremain to provide turn-arouao sp<i- back onto Shadywood Rcjad. , 1- ^ «« hhe runoff from the property draihfrwn"t.^rd%Very 0“^ Sh^dy^^^o^o/Road. rather than toward the lake. Kelley closed the Public „'’-r'935 “wh.en"^the that he was a Planning reviewed. He said, application involving the P’’^° .^epi-ieex that t.he pavers would ’•The Planning Commission was skeptical work/ and they have not." It was moved by Kelle_y, "^ii^oUr? anT^tSe approval of t.he after-th. p„„„ended t.hat the resolution of setback Variances. delude language restricting any approval/ if adopted by r»-ooercv All voted aye. Motionadditional hardcover on this propercy. ali carried. M - 9 - -u / ^ %im ■7 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 13, 1991 (#7)ZOt«NG FILE #1631-HOHHEIER CONTIOTED originally granted November 2.1, 1987. All voted aye passed. Motion (J8)Z0N1NG FILE #1633-ANDREW MCDERMOTT 2702 WALTERS PORT LANE VARIANCE-RESOLUTION #2963 Andrew McDermott was present. noT-nhardson r*^viewed the i!.;sues involved w’th Mr. M n outlined in Jeanne Mabusth*s _ AprH 10, 1991 memo. He noted that the Planning Commission ® recommended approval of this applicatxon. - Goetten stated that hardcover i.n the 75-250 foot setback ar-a exceeds what is allowed. She indicated that to s-e the 5.57% of landscaping plastic removed in light McDermott's request to add hardcover to the property. ofr^ilahan stated that excess hardcover, in the form landscape areas with underlying plastic, is not allowed and is o be automatically removed. # Goetten aareed with Callahan, and noted that the Planning commission had not included removal of the landscaping plastic v.heir recommendation for this application. McDermo^.t stated that his improvement plans do nof include any improvements within the 75-250 foot setback area. Goetten indicated to Mr. McDermott, that ^ _ _ _ _ _ 'From t"he 7*^—Z3U LOOuGoetten foot- request to remove 54 e.tcess h.irdcover from 7 ^the ■ sMbl-k area w.as not asking too much, ard would bring the setod.-fw a-L..a _ _ j for that area.hardcover percent closer, to the 25% allowed for that area. Jabbour concurred with Goetten. • ■ ti’ , :v -t was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to aoopt Resolution #2963, as amended, to applicant t.n remove 5.57% hardcover from area. Jabbour requested Staff to bring back fo "rf^astic that information depicting alternatives All 'vot^d aye.may be acceptable from a hardcover standpoint. All voc-a y Motion passed. (#9)ZONING FILE #1635-JOHN O*SULLIVAN/ERWIN SMIT 2420 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE-COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN-RESOLUTION #2964 John O'Sullivan was present. Bernhardson provided a brief explanation °/v recuesw 'place an addition onto O'Sullivan's Service Station. - 3 - ■. (V II !-r: >*'. ■>; r"- ■ f , ■Vv.' 7 ■ Ayr ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 13, 1991 i • <r--it:.\ •'vOT adopt resolution 42964, an addition ?r t1fe"%a\ «'‘,Vf”cil?ty \°ocatsd at 2420 Shadywood Road. All voted aye. Motion passed. (#10) ZONING FILE #1638-CITY OF ORONO 1385 BROWN ROAD SCcJTH ''"'“?t“«as moved by dabbour, -=-<^ad by Mayor Peterson, to table this application. All voted aye. Motion passed. (#11) ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS SECTION 10.02-FACILITIES OF OTHER PUBLIC ENTITIES °«“^~a*s';ofe“”by®'ca\Tahan. seconded by Butler, to adopt OrdinLce 494,' Second Series amending Section 1^0- SHiiliSgi o^? cfli^i s. ‘’Ll'vft^I aye.- Motion passed. "„“as";3T%abbo1.r , seconded by Mayor Peterson, to S-: refer this item back to the Planning Commission for their review. ^jLl voted aye. Motion passed. ENGINEER’S REPORT (#12*)NAVARRE HEIGHTS STORM SEWER-ACCEPT BIDS RESOLUTION 42965 -oetten seconded b- Butler, to adopt Resoi;tio“n“42965r ac/ept" ng bids for the Navarre Heights storm sewer project. All voted aye. Motion passed. (#13)REQ0EST FOR PAYMENT #7-P0MPH0^^^^^ _ Peterson, to It was Construction, in t.he amount of ■ $15f?.35.15, for the Pumphouse #3 project. A Motion passed. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT: (#14) JOINT COONCIL/PLANNING COmiSSION^^^ awarded a Mayor Peterson statad that her son going ju joint i5chola.rship on the Sw^me ®3s also noted* that May Council/Planning Commission meeting. «uch the meeting 21 wns a School Board Election f 7' ""y‘’p%\“„®ra%rogized fol cou..d not start until 8.' f• ' asked Planning Commission the inconvenience of rescheduling. -—^se-io- members regardingrhai' KeU«y to poll thi- Planning Commission memoe-s i y cnaii fve-i-y , a-uad- che would then contact him.another meeting date, and that sne wo - 4 - irK'i* M:r ..V'# -'‘<w T'* >; y -- .• ^-r >r7» ,cv /\r ' r T - ' " yi • , > - • ^ :. • V A Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Pen Moorre/ City Administrator I From •'.^C Date Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator July 9, 1992 Subject: #1748 Bob Hovland, 1245 North Arm Drive - Conditional Use PermitAariances - Public Hearing . r i ^ jiA . Pertinent Ordinances ’^r n 1 Section 10.03, Subdivision 10 - Conditional use permit required for all accessory structures to be placed on through lots. « Section 10.75, Subdivision 4 (A) - All structures must meet front yard setback on all through lots. ,‘4 Required Proposed = 35' (Although shown at 30', applicant will 5 relocate to 35' setback. Site inspection confirms no topographic restraints to restrict a 5' movement to the east.) sea ■* ■. ? Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (E) - Accessory structure is shown at a 990 s.f. in area. Requires a 15' side setback. Required = 15' Proposed = 10’ ili|P^ Variance = 5* or 33.3%. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Lot coverage requirements. Total lot area = 11,767 s.f. Allowed lot coverage = 1,765 s.f. or 15% Proposed *= 1,827 s.f. or 15.5% Variance = 62 s.f. or .5%. I?.'. ■ ■' r- Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover within 250-500' area. Area “ 11,767 s.f. aiiowoH sa 3.530 s.f. or 30% s.f. or 17.6% s.f. or 28.4% setback mlmm required.V “1 -■ .V • <1* MM mm■■mn Kiss k mm Vii'V'' '.Vmmm rf '• <dt Zoning File #1748 July 9, 1992 Page 2 i: P! -Vt List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Survey E - Elevations F - Section G - Floor Plan H - Hardcover Fact Sheets Description of Request Applicant proposes the installation of a 30'x33* detached garage to be installed at the west/street side of the lot. The proposed garage will replace an existing garage in severe disrepair setback 6' from Elnwood right-of-way (referenced as Summit Drive per old plat). The existing structure is functionally useless as garage doors open to south side of structure. Based on the age of the existing vegetation# it appears it has not been used as a garage for many years. • * / L The proposed garage will require a side setback variance and lot coverage variance. The need for variances was not known at the^ time of preliminary discussions with applicant and therefore a variance application was not filed with the conditional use permit. Issues for Consideration How does the 62 s.f. of excess of structural lot coverage affect your considerations? What unique findings or hardships can be made to support a recommendation of approval. Review Exhibit D. If structure is relocated closer to area where lot meets 60* width# the garage would not meet the required 10* separation. Can structure be reduced to 750 s.f. (25*x30*)? \ • I ■ • v:": xr,' * ' '■••X ^4 CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 1245 North Arm Drive Orono Mi Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 0711723410014 Please attach legal description to applicatioii if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Bob Hovft>land Phone (home) 559-5355 Phone (work) 559-4737 Address 12400 46th Ave. No.City Plymouth Phone (home) Zip 55442 OWNER (if different than applicant) Ncune Bob Hovftland Phone lease mail toAddress 12950 Hiway #55 City Plymouth Zip 55441 Date Frop^riy-Acquired I (do)(fdonptV 7/87 (month/year) also^ own the adjacent parcels of land J : ■FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application % $125.00 Residential accessory Use $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration (•••TTV !':C‘ ."ftir.WiT Li I I u*i u-Mv/ifi./ F OFFICE i IC0200000 Ul CEH 125.00 '‘'-'A iL 125.00j^iJCrr U-l ICi/l r. k. I L t YOU }{24^B90 cool ROl T0i>:i 06/ISa Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule Si--' iKi^ Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD — refer to fee schedule) Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule $ 75.00 $300.00 $300.00 • 7 PRESENT OSE OF PROPERTY I • Present Zoning District ^ Present Use of Property LRIB Re<;-i dpnt -’^l Residential Other (specify) DESCnaPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail:Conditional Use Permit to install accessory structure 30'x33 on a through lot REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. _ Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350 (you can obtax. this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governmen Center 348-3271). 1, Plat Mao. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). I. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. ,, •V. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR_ _ A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCTO'SNTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete Initials of Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _c_ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information requxred or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred review of this application, and certifxes that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Icnowledge. Applicant's signature '/-/ y'Date 6/12/92 OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ac>;nowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized rec.«?onable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this ^quest. Owner's signature Y_ _/_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. mm:- wuamEsmm we ^fseoossMoasMtosseii\ Vv. F; SaBBBHW BMlaMMBd W//MyyfiOi\ ^r/ Wi^*:WHHWaiW~'** »l b*^1m S^tnEflBfZiawaiSBMMSKt m^. ■M m IW—wBWHIlEEgMgl TO 3;:m m. ti I l^^9H m1 f * ^<a ’iia ;^t:ri''' ?. -.fviv-SC/j:; .y>-::;yy ::•■ ■ ■ v%^ 'i.'. •, ! '■ •■■ ■ ■ -jOTlV-vvy ■•;> ■; •• ■ .” :-•, .... CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO ) SS. I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1748, was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 30th day of June, 1992. So:.' 1 Vi : mmm Jamie Bosma a \ y -■ *■ , -ai .. v; r '■ ■ - ^ V.>‘■•M ‘.m^. v'". '' 'h vvif t: '-i. . Hi ■vvf:- V i v:-:£ 5-’ ^r -| iP'- WM Hffla5£S#iSI W& .' ■ ’r • ■^fe % 2t ■ ■* -■•••■ -i-M . ^* - ■ J&y^ ‘ :4- ■• ■ ■ :WA ; V-:r -, ■^%v- -. . -fc’' J , . ■ ■ ■ ■: ' ■ .i m :,:'44- 5- .. ^t- Uv ,' -r:V Jix, %:: yyymm^yy^^ |f?.<! : . ' ■ ■ ,.'f ^ V ?«.' •- • ’■ ^ :;■.; -J. 1 ■ v,,* •. »y'' :5. .«i,..-'/• -i-'«;tf-;'5vv ymm^S-' 5. y-'d ........... •v.rP-.->'":.f ..■♦i I, ^■■fe t.V;JL i. OA.* WAVS^4«V> The Planning Commission will hold Public Hearings at 1275 South Brown Road on Monday, Juiy /u, reviewing the following land use applications: in the Council Chambers 1992 on the matter of 1. 2. 3. 9. 11. #1746 Thomas and Margaret Lowe of 2630 West approval of lakeshore setback and hardcover variances within 0 75 letbLk area for a proposed addition to the street side of the existing residence.'i #1747 John O'Sullivan of O'Sullivan’s located at 2420 Shad^ood load has applied for a renewal variance seeking approval of ® side setback vtlitnce for a proposed addition to the existing carwash. '1I #1748 Bob Hovland of 1245 North Arm Drive has applied for a conditional use permit to construct a detached garage on a through lot. iT7*;n rh;,rlefi and Shirley Pyle of 3548 Ivy Place seek approval of a llardcover%"lktnce w\th?n the 75-250’ setback area for a proposed addition to the existing residence and the installation of a detached garage within the street yard of the lakeshore property. •i #1751 James Brooks of 3785 Watertown Road seeks approval ® setback variance for the proposed construction of a detached garage. #1752 George W. Kalweit of 4265 Forest Lake Drive seeks approval of an after-the-fact variance for structural improvements of a deck located within 75* of the shoreline of Forest Lake. #1753 Skip Madge of 875 Forest Arms Lane seeks approval of lakeshore setback variance for a proposed swimming pool and patio area within the lakeshore yard of his property. #1754 E. Leo Bullock of 2940 Casco Point Road seeks approval of an after-the-fact variance for structural repairs and alterations of an existing deck that requires cipproval of hardcover ^gges located within the 75-250* setback area where hardcover excesses exist. #1755 Leonard Niska of 2304 Shadywood Road seeks approval of side and street setback variances for a proposed detached garage. #1756 Robert E. Wilson of 4156 Highwood seeks approval of a sid^ setback and hardcover variance within the 75-250 setback allow structural repairs of an existing screened porch. #1757 Albert D. Hanser of 1685 Fox Street seeks approval of a conditional use permit for the continued use of a guest house located on his residential property currently being considered subdivision by the City. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this meeting. Written comments are solicited. Plans are available for review in the City offices, by appointment. City of Orono By: Planning Commission i.'yVyUL ^ ^f " ^ . _ • « « • _ rV_ _ _ __ 1 mm. mmm ^Jeanhe A. Mabusth, Building S Zoning Administrator nr»oi i«5>>or^ ♦►ho wooV: of Julv 6. 1992. ■ __________________________- - - ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________.. ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * K ir f ."7J —r ^ r--^5 •>« . ■'i'. '*■» 'V v^t r*"* Wi •Afev \*’ •r .;, ’nz *% X * .* *rr^r -«■*^! A* • ' i s . of^. X X - ^ .? ®F3 ■mn • * ' 1 ■n Ii o CD 1 n ' *p ' 4 f » ju X 1 rj.•1 iH I r - » , r I ll' l!\ -1 I*'" :r . iif,>;?s ssm» •• -•■ . ■; ■•- ■! V- r.-~ •■■ . •■: Oi^ im mmn's'-iiiiii * i CO>fO r:o >073oicm ^ z I i I '.?k il mmm tj' *.imi^:.- . ,-. t •.■,•*!,• . ' ■ »i ••■^CD r tr-1ii * • ■ . »4 ^ S I* m^mm |^';v^j||| fc. Wri ,/i m -!• mmm I1S4 ■'fe* "f- 'i'* * « V • .t> k-. m X • t-H* k;-_ •• *A- ;S r^-DBL,x"w # A • -x ’ CP -1 ~ c:—! o O CP 73 05 73 ■r CD >•H O m « o• CP \ » • ■ '' / 'v .>■ y, y. •Nioa-H :iim = r>cix — X* -h5 73(0 C8^S5 cfzo 2 i O CD CPoo >X! 3)rri! OO; 73 - CJ > V \ •A tCM ■> • k-is:. »,’:■** -..-V . - j • •• V *' j;«' •: iim. •I:m •■ iPlii ‘.V ^ ':V..;- '.. ■ ■.,.... ■ ' ............................. m0 ‘.: M -T -...W: K 30-0 '/•r* ■■•■# . • I ■ if’- 5.COURSES OF BLOCK ON SLAB i % . '.,v ■>^ : .s . ♦ ■- 5^ - : i -i m ■3 COURSES OF BLOCK ON SLAB . I COURSE OF BLOCK ON SLAB-- - - - - - t .‘j t*;: ■d:-'X i. 6" BLOCK 4 concrete slab ; i ! i 1! • ! 8/1 ■ STL. flush 0. H. .iF WHITE ■*,-■;. , . l6'X7'iSTL. FLUSH ! 0. H. DR. WHITE •• ^ • > • ^•;4 DBL S^XIZ" HDR. ' W/F OXBRD.----- .•. DBL. is'xia'' HDR. w/x/ OXBKD-- wtf vipmv aX3Q ’APRON 8-0 ’ I **• ____________ 16-0 ’ i *.... 4?^. V 30'-C" SCALE: \‘-0 u£i_<iLj *, Existing Hardcover in Zone House LENGTH •iTT- y. im: ' ■ ' #" i- : * )f-75' 715-230' » • ! t • 1 width rr 1 t 1 J 1 r 3. Garage 33 c. Driveway 30 ^rSPf Cctt'cD. Sidewalk_ _ _ _ _ _x E. Patio/ Deck F. Landscape areas UNDERU^IN ?L.3T.C- • SHEETING .. X P- G. Other Total Hardcover in ![one Total Property A rea in A I Zone Bl ■ ~74- L 9r S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. g?< S.F, S. ^. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. *' ■f *1 ‘. S.F. S' V- ■ • ■■'' 33^'i ’ ■_ S.F. lif2JaIL S.F.B X IGO . 25.4 •% Mf''hj:y-'> ifm 1/ To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Date: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator July 16f 1992 Subject: #1750 Charles and Shirley Pyle, 3548 Ivy Place - . Variances - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Review of hardcover A. 0-75' setback area = 4,075 s.f. Existing hardcover = 948 s.f. Proposed hardcover = 948 s.f. B. '■m . '■ "='i p 75-250' setback area = 8,150 s.f. Allowed = 2,037.5 s.f. or 25% Existing = 5,870 s.f. or 72% Proposed = 4,425 s.f. or 54% Existing variance = 3,832.5 s.f. or 47% ProDosed variance = 2,387.5 s.f. or 29.2% n i- V mm- Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Review of lot coverage Total area * 12,225 s.f. Allowed lot coverage *= 1,833.7 s.f. or 15% Existing = 1,810.2 s.f. or 14.8% Proposed “ 2,929 s.f. or 23.9%* Variance = 1,095.3 s.f. or 8.95% *Adjusted amount if it is determined that roofed patio and walkway not credited against lot coverage. Adjusted amount *= 2,266 s.f. or 18.5% Variance = 432.3 s.f. or 3.5% ,v Ti- List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Plat Map C -- Property Owners List D - Survey E - Proposed Site Plan - Elevations Southeast and Southwest P - 1-2 Hardcover Fact Sheets ♦ ■. f Description of Recpiest Applicant proposes the removal of the existing garage within the street yard and the installation of a new detached garage closer to residence structure. The comprehensive improvement project also includes a family room addition to the southeast side of the residence located out of the 75' setback area and behind the average lakeshore setback line. The garage structure at 612 s.f. in area meets the required 10' side setback. Applicant proposes 663 s.f. of roof V. 1 .an- ■y'm-X ' .:-*. •• '•’ ■ Zoning Memo #1750 July 16, 1992 Page 2 structure over a walkway and patio area to be installed between the detached garage and residence structure. The roof structure meets the required 10' setback from the side lot line. f. Planning Commission members are asked to consider the lot coverage ordinance specifically the section that reads as follows: "All roof structures which extend more than 6’ above grade level." In reviewing the lot coverage facts for the improvement project, the 663 s.f. of roofed area was included with structural inventory. Lot coverage is shown at 23.9% where 15% is allowed. The improvement does result in a reduction in overall hardcover of approximately 18%. Structural coverage increases from 14.8% to 23.9%. m Review Exhibit E. Note break in drainage. Runoff from the majority of the proposed new improvements shall drain to street and eventually northwest to Casco Cove along Ivy Place. Hardship Statement Please review Exhibit A.nIssues for Consideration 1.The improvement shows a 9.1% increase in structural hardcover on the property. ''an non-essential structural improvements be reduced ! " How essential is o63 s.f. of roof structure? Lie Exhibit E, the southeast elevation depicts impact of proposed structure. Hardcover has been reduced almost 18% and is now proposed at 54%, Are there other non-essential areas of hardcover that can be removed? The majority of landscape areas underlain with plastic are to be removed with the proposed improvement. What of proposed improvements? Can paved or walkway areas be reduced? 3.Improvement project will result in the loss of two mature maple trees. Is it appropriate to ask for replantings with variance approval? Any condition of approval should contain the following conditions: 1. t .• Grading and drainage plan must be submitted with building permit for new improvements? 2.All hardcover scheduled for removal must be completed at the time rf the footing inspection for the new garage. 'i Zoning Memo #1750 July 16, 1992 -m :••. ^. Page 3 3.Applicant to obtain a demolition permit for removal detached garage. of 4.Planting schedule to be submitted with building permit as a result of the loss of two mature maple trees within street yard? Y<r^ U j ^ ' . y>:V- ■ . I»l .i’ • .vV uy '^3 ' - T'^'- •I'S I:: ■ ■ . 4 . 1 , .fj. *,v. ;, C-»W- • my-:wy ' , mm JUL. CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) #1750 rrTV I'lC ncnkin LI t I Wl z.' V ‘ A»r c r rc jfPI jutr-iTu-u wi » itu• : t/rvv»/v».) /X W w'V*-V'V W'V » PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address /if rrAj vJi euM TiI u •ivfV .'urrir' ‘■''oLvrT?jT_-,u^;.v vnu \ l^wwull » ' • ^ -1 • ,4 V* — rS f*f*H I f f ^ w^L*Vi-UVV'A MWJk IV'UPw (>5/'‘25/ Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) ^ Attach legal description to application if not Date Proper^ Arauired''^l>)I^^W^_ _ _(month/year) I (do)cgo^^ also own the adjacent parcels of land Present use of property: X residential other(specify) Zoning District: ^ APPLICANT Phone (home ) ^ZO ' Ncime fi:. . P^rilTIggrPhone (work)_Wj_62^ Address •■ -TVteM^?0 f\] <£). City: , lAPU?. ------- OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Address: -^4-g> _ City: Phone (home) ^*1 \ ~~ Phone (wor)c) ^ \ 1 ^ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail; [^4^ VARIANCES REQUIRED _ _ Lot Area Setbac)c: Lot Width y_ Hardcover Lot Coverage T-*- Front Side Rear Average La)ceshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS .. Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliant 0 (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS , . All of the following information must be submitted bjy __the—apj^lrcatign deadline date in order for your application to be considered c<jgl>lgte ^ ,-T’’ .. ir 1. Completed Application Form 2. y Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. y Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy BJi^xll" for reproduction). 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll"). 6. %/^S)cetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8is''xll"). 7. As an addendum to this application^ please.attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. _Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that variance application is not complete if t.he above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administratorf agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and co: u/i^M OWNERS SIGNATURE ^ The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorises reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga- Applicant's Signature \J Date tion and verification of this reauest. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all stflbmtttals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month.* Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ■i I V ^ ^ ■ ■. Sc. ft?' 4 n //'/.^j£-^^ -•’ ‘ ‘ / * I’T > • ^ •n^jy';:-j:^y ^ ^ >{n> '. i -.r ^srnm: ‘ • .-’. ■ ■' *• ■ ' ■ ^ .♦• *ti «i «4 t,S(V) . / ^ • cV ‘-i •Aj:ri>- •i-yV.'T •. .* SiV'Mv\ (M) 7 >. ??? (64 ^ j^. *-7^v A- - ’ Lir./ - «► *V • * —iST'^V^^ * V --Am - - -^'. - ■ W-yr' ^“j jiAi . \ 1 I CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR CHARLES PYLE OF LOT 174. TAYLOR’S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA bu LCCAL OtSCfiJ^Tlon Of FtfMSCS SU»vCtCD! Lot IM. .f..OP*t SuMifision of Spring lolt. Tnii twrt^jr lAttndi to ihow iht Oound«rtti of lf»f «bOft dticn&ed pro; frtjr. md i»vt loc«uon of i« titstmd f»ou4t. iod fisitle fura- covff iR#»’ten, li uoti not purpori lo ina« 4njr oi^tr loprovooenit or tncroic''«f«lt. 0 Iron s««'Atr 0t4riii9t tAo«n 4rt b4ttd upon 4n 4ssuntd 44tufl. i t « -r*40 .NfZ> »«(t*n ■ji'Tfcvv lAANN ft •• >> n .• f ■•* O'lMiitinc I I'v'iiiOf'' l*Vki N<r;\TAY-. ^5[S5^ 482 faniarock A\cmM* • U«ng LdU.*, M\ M «« ift »« tni . 612*4734141 •It rr-.-:-v 1 H, To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date;July 9, 1992 Subject #1752 George W. Kalweit, 4265 Forest Lake Drive - After the Fact Variance - Public Hearing Fi Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Lakeshore setback variance required for major structural Improvements of existing deck located within 75' setback area. Allowed = 0 ^ Existing = 69' riance *® 6' or 8% Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 A. 0-75' setback area ® 13,725 s.f. Allowed = 0 Existing = 105 s.f. Proposed *= 105 s.f. *#r* ■ f. I B.75-250' setback area * 24,075 s.f. Allowed = 6,019 s.f. or 25% '^ Existing * 5,458.3 s.f. or 22.6% No hardcover variances required for approval of structural repair within 75-250' setback area. List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Plat Map C - J*roperty Owners List D - Plan E - Building Permit for Screening in of Porch P - Building Permit for Residence 12/29/69 G - Topographic/Grading and Drainage Improvements for Forest Arms Plat E - Forest Arms Plat I - Survey lOescription of Request Applicant's contractor was stopped in the process of completing structural repair of an existing 8'x60' deck at the lake side of the existing residence. Based upon the inspector's observations at the site, it appeared the structure couId be located within the 75' setback area. Applicant was asked to provide a survey on file for the necessary building permit. Applicant filed a variance application as Zoning File #1752 July 9, 1992 Page 2 30on as it was realized that portions of the deck were located within the 0-75* setback area. There is a 6' encroachment of the lakeshore protected zone and 105 s.f. of structural hardcover located within the 0~75' setback area. Applicant has just recently purchased the property in April of this year and p^ to complete other rennovations within the interior of the structure Upon a site inspection, members will note remnants of a former gravel drive that was located within the street yard. Mr. Kalweit plans to complete the restoration of the grassed yard as soon as the interior improvements are completed. Based on staff's review of the hardcover within the 75—250' setback area, it appears that no hardcover variances are necessary for the structural repairs of the deck outside of the 75' setback area. Review Exhibit B, technically applicant is also required to seek approval of an average lakeshore setback variance as entire structure is located in front of the average setback line of the adjacent flag lot to the immediately north. A commons out lot abuts the lot to the Immediate south. Deck structure has no impact on the lakeshore views of the flag lot nor on the house to the immediate south of the Commons lot. Staff has enclosed copies of the grading and drainage plans and plat for North Arm, Exhibits G and H. It is staff's understanding that the applicant wants the City to address their concern regarding a drainage problem along the south side lot line. An underground PVC pipe outlets within the lakeshore yard of the applicant. The plat. Exhibit H, shows the City did not obtain the necessary drainage ana utility easements along the oouth side of the lot. Staff inspected the site and can confirm that theie is no rip rap at the outlet nor was there any sign of any improvement to minimize erosion. Exhibits have been included as merely information for Planning Commission as staff has not received a written statement regarding applicant s concerns Hardship Statement Please review Exhibit A. tfiiini iiMiai If hiiiifciii a. Vij fi ■-’j CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) #1 / Jim . .. PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) ^^60 /C=> Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired ^ _ _ _ _ _(month/year) I (do)Cfdo not)) also own the adjacent parcels of land. f"7TV i‘-r / C i/ITw •( C i v»A.*A1 ww*\/«:.v,'vvv V ii I PresenclTs^ of property: Zoning District;_ _ _ _ _ residential other (specif ,*< Tv va J4-<i riA wru V • V / APPLICANT Name V' V' i ! » V ^ J V W • Phone (home) jh ^ ^E/^l7c|P Ilf. l^frCujei4-‘Phone (worlc) ^9^3 Address; 42/^Fs>Rc<T Ldku City: ORDa/Q Zip;^ OITNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (wor)c) Address;City;Zip; DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail; Estimated Construction Cost $ '1^00 ♦ QQ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Setbac3c;Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requi^jments; sX^Ae ^ J-t. Jy ^ ^ - - - --- •>- taiAri iVrfa'ri • 4* >.'-x »s t ‘: * '•' iki 9 n. II 100.04 *9'trt I : - ■ ** M^ f ■ —■ V* ' -»• X-.m • • • V V•\* •V i' ■*' -^. -’** r- : v;*^.-.-..7? i>,-' Aim I".’ > / •«0 ?'SI r^jy= \(92) 217.73 / A a * *• • * [2‘ « • •- 8] r > \ ^ 1 • ''f • Ui 1 1 •\ ^•_\ cu «/ V ^ c____j:__A \r^i-» / ^ 1• 1 ,* i-% 1 . _n.\ \ < ^1 ••;A ...—1-1 r (!0 ’)\ \ K / V "T 1 r • • • & »...2\ .•V ^ J>3^» L. !K 1.. *y ■±\ /*. \ / V C1 SI 1 •• iir V % . a • 'f'•tr V m* M k ” » • *>« • • (20<)' ------—\— >» 1 '^'i1-°' La‘H>5" z*’ r' W (211 >' \ V !0 :; df^lo l.(54)t 0 Vi'5 •—L^JUAIS s \(83) / _r ** • i \ / (Zl*?) ' J —j—V / 1- ’1 ’% ' ■ ;-■■ V ■ ^ .un. !< S V4C 4 r,€^//y///7 (r. 3 —4>- fti k t ^I^'ifr k^Ti.r n^».i .kM-fet*. .a I^i-t .r T r ii , i a IUbPi .*■ r4^ll^^n -h.Li w wi <^a^UA>. -. tr . ka.il . .r- ':V- ■ ;■ ”'*.*--------------------------- •V^^ li >.<'•>> y?/.2 * ' ^ "•’ ^'. Vli ^ ; ... 4 ._ •:j> •TiJ OMfCTI I^ACn NtMMMVO t TMNg .} HMT tl VIUIO M MfOMt .'*§••«? It lauto OH*— P’<t» f T|»»l '’""‘Hhn 9^ j( I .tlOA*.^Knrffm Y7~ / L^if7^0.1. nATinMHH ---£/<L<^„ li? 2942 TOTAl f If /ONiNQ DisrMicr 2 OATI lu AHOMTtCt iTti m i 1 tUtLOCR INifiiti {r^^. m.i Aid/yhu^ 1. TTMO^«W** S'^LK jUl•. mi 0*1 tT^ocnwi «W*^I 10^' %. WMTttTION 0*T| M TTPt or CONbTttUCnON IT, PWONT TA«» t NO or JTori &uiA II. P^^IHTYOlMCNSlOMi If fAO^fMTY AMCA to fT ___ It. MAH YAMO TO. irriM^TiQCOiTh.0 O 12, NO. Of f AMiLIf i in A#»4»<«biil riAf /ONf AOOMQAri fCOOH AAIA flOOA AAf A AAtiO lAATIRlAt fiLf with Of ^STAif T AAMINQ CtSNSTmjCTlON fOOTM___ It. LOST AACA P(f fAMILY 30 fT^_________________ It. Slot YAHOO < ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND SIGNATURE: TT*» tftdmignrd H«r#by vpon rll of th* po«»Hiot of ftw, for tho purpoto of iodocif^g tho VILLAGE OE OflOElO to lokt tho octloA horoirt roqMOitfd. th#' iM ototomoMi htrtin oro truo fRAMHNQ fINAL CIRTtf tCAYl Of OCCUTAMCY ond thot ill ffOft htrtm moMioriod frill b# dono in occordonco with Pw ordinonco of tho VILLAGE OE OEONOt tho Stoto of Minnototo, Slid nilinpo of tho Buildif>9 Ooporlmont. OATf ID. 771^ m Ai ■ »' ♦-.! •* 4. •fJ ; ** V i m i:-:i J -,v ■•W-:. -V . .» I 'ii;- ■;* i7 t %-« V' f."*y \ 7 ; S'. ati__ 1%/ , VIULAGI or ORONO BUILDINO ?IRM jT 7 omm. AOMfSS mONI NO. u, ijfci. ,7)i PUtfOfI Of lU lUftOBt AOOtfSS fHONI NO If y iT, fo'cai No. Sj ^ «MMT N2 2335 Block A^ltlon Of SwMIvItJoo i S%Bo I \ tAMb MfcnmoN SUo of Lot Land Sq. Ft. Elovotlen i •UILOINO LOCATION Olt. From Rood OIr. S(do« DIt. Bock Drolnogo CONSTRUCTION Fiomo ftwc.;'* Slono FOOT1NOS Ooplh r width Brick, Solid Brick Vonoor Comoni BlockTJXT^^ircr-^ L msI D«pth ± 7~*^low Crodo FOUNDATION . Conrtrvctlon SI so ■AfttHHT y lerl/ Oreund Drolnogo 0 ^ Floor ^f* " C Booring Foots Sizo Spodng Slip SpanJ;^' CHIMNIYS No. Fow.*tdotloA Holght Abevo Roof Smoko Flpo DUtonco From Joists NO. OF FIlEl___________ Typo VhM /UcC FLOORS // Swb Flooring /v Joists Bpoeing /(.*'— l> Booring f'fircCH Siio^ */Spon \(c' ” Bridging ____________^LLI SSTUOOINOS ruo Spadng Ho FloCos RAFmS SIso ^ Spacing Spon BrocJng DUNO JOtm, SUo ■ *yyl'rr OOTS I — No. \ ^S4oirwoy Stoirwoy r1' 1st Floor — No. INMMATION — Colllnj^f*' ^ WoUs^ /^. ^ VINTILATVON AND UOHT Ptrc^ntoQ# of Floor Aroo Vonf. P^rcantag# of Light to Floor A/#a UNTIU SIto ^ Spon I O Locotlon Xvi / • t / /^ ri WIU TYPi Conifrvction locotlon • ( > SIPTIC TANICf OR MUNIOPAL HOOKUP □ Slio DUtnnco Prom Walt . • Conttrualon DRAINPIOD Dapth Width langth Dlitonco From Wall Olitanco From Lot Llnoa PiUMAINO PIXTURIS Garbaga Dispoaal / Sinka /•/ Loundry ^ Both Tub / Dlah Woihaf / Showof// TolUt // / iovotory lift /^on /fj'rue't re^ -hA^'y-24- tOrof tlAu tiJ ^>4^’ ‘U LjmiWMtt ' f^'Tji ■'_g :i jrA- Doto.jy- Bldg, t/^7^ 0 ^Flwmb. $. SUo tnomlnorioo t Woll t.Tolol 1 FlUMBRIL AOORBSSu WELL DRILLER ADDRESS SSWlt CONTRACTOR. ADDRESS___________ Approvod.At owm oiatfTMO 2 \ im. . <1^ ‘ *• . ,sV -V* * --* ' '■'■•' *• 'v"v'* ^ .fLa r ■ ’ - * ^ i • ♦ _ #RB n ^ r ^ ■ - •S- • ■ - ' ^ ^ ^ ,1- ■ V - -i-- * , t" 1. ^ ‘ ^ ^ • i K-.- . * A-;:. ...... . , ■: *■ ., ■ .' «r.-- Jl- \ ‘‘ A * 3 F%.- . ■'*• V . . •% • ■ ! 'i iHI IT «▼» m > 9 \ _ > rn z o S > o :r ;o n ts 53 O TJ O "3^ 53 > Oo 53 > X 2 o z *3 ^5 "□ m > 53 \ -< > > m 2 o O » > O O 2 »;s m a >S o oo - ^ % O ro 2 2 O W > 04 Q Cl f- 04 X »• M > ^ > C9 C3 :s 2 ui o— -n4 I M c/>» m-fiM ,-ac 3 1/1 O ^ •n ♦ S ;k » I > VI 5c •< m f» IK -o ^ O 2 o o n o w S in . o Cl a -n n o vn o g § > o %' 2 » > M(/I r* 50 -n 1-4 -i m I- O * ni VI 50 I » O ^ A ^^559n m >50 O n»- BM •< 04 O M VI 04 -i M f- M JE o m o 1-4 o 9^ 2 ui >» 2 a nin 2 2 W 04 04 2 O23 > ^ 50 > ^ -n -n -3 o >-* »-* 59 o t3 v> r* ►-» o o m 2 2 X m m < 2 2 > •-• I- in o o r“ o m m m -1 < < -< 2 m m f- 1“ 2 W O O 2 H 2 2 O 04O o o 0 o •V h* •M I IS* 04 ^9m 2 dIS 3 2m m oo 2mw VI ►4 04 inin 33is o o SS-^-SSgo?«7«® 5 VI o o o2 3J2 ^ ^ ^ r- O 3 50 I S 2 m ^ 5 v4 ^ V% > M M O \ M O^N«o V* w o i -2 •» » *r ^ ■ W - IS* n o o o > VI VI oooin V -. ^ V-.- I I M M mo • v--f ■• •i* IB'?** ••r o O 2 M 2 « 2 O^ ^ ai m 4^ >•( __ ni 2 m VI -5 5^ m M -55hm m M X a 2 Q > <n M 2 H m 2 HO•H>r- o > z 54 ^ o O 04 IS ^ X» O CB* c in 2 H CD Z r“a 2 Q 2 in o o 2 >3 59 a I2 m z o *-VI > rn 2 M -10 o o 0* 2 I Ui > ni m fs> in 2 r- VI 04 04 2 -1Cl > O O Cl Q 20m g in o 9 8 o CD a m o 22 232 2 X 5^ i VI O Q > IS* r- 2 m 2 O Cl VI o m M 01 2 2 o% O O O •< -<m m -n O 2 m VI M M «,>55 vn 2 2 2 04 2 o n I/I O o ^ -4-4 (Ti m I O 04 0 01 01 o o I 2 Mo ^ 2 I m rs» V> 04 -1 M > M 2 O o o r* O' > o o o o o w » ^ 2 ®g o c» u (D Z >Do 2 2 2 o o o > > ^3222 I 2 m r- r* m - ■ VI m m 2 M -4 «< *< O <>4 SS VIOi 5 ..m. Ill m H M n o > • ' * ■■ j <r- f V ^ !20 ’9 75 -:S . I i il' »r ff • 26 ooc <c { iC< ) 9S t3La____ 1 -<• « • • 4 • * « « 4 -4 hkii: •i 7 7 5 i»i$ ,27:h 1 t • * • • • /92} ,”T 75 -93! ro 5 ✓r ••^^... ^ (ZOp (Jake ; •1 — 1 te 7 ts i?>-i_______?i«l ........... lot ! I !4 • • • • • rf'j>A I9» S / ■?a '■95* ■~-v:H ^.. k-. U*1 •*4 •t >* rr\ C \ E—i -------!— »' "v3kg:*«>^ *• I 1——..■• I X Vh >^4 ;<_ - ‘^y. ■'w- ♦, ; Adjacent Property Owners' Ac3cnowledgement Form ^ t '-vp^ 1 (we) P . Avwcl^ C (?k ct-V Pay)^-K------------- ---------- [print nanie(s)] of (=''f<\- X// [print address] <-h#» nlans for th^ proposed improvement or proposed use of the 5"', .1- “ •• "" Application No (are) not asked ritv Council that I (we) am (are) aware of thrirpfoLrent tL proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. -AAi -IA Property Owner Date 6 ; rs'-£i Date -:W. itHirtHtit******************************** ■TilPn/' •‘ '’Sr _ ^ • I (we) R-lf/ /g !'< ^ ----------------- [print namejts)] of (print address] ^ nlans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the XerV/Tolafed i^' Application No fe I (we) understand that xn ®^®^^^^?^^^®Q^^^"Qf^the^propeWy or use (are) not asked C^ I ^we) am (are) aware of th^ rm^roL-nTp^^Ts^^^^^^ tL proposed neighbor's project or use re<julr6S Council approval* operty Owner V^ CrJJzM. £1# 4 -»* .V Jf » ‘ ■ • I • Date 1 ■r ,1 >r. a • I J Q 3 -i) Property Owner Date Xf you have any inf°-ation that^.ay TotLTotfic: TL\Z Xl prior to the scheduled .eating date. 1 •;- ii~ / / A 'i« / MIIUIMEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 fOMO OF MANAGERS: Janm R. Spensien Pres. • John E. Thomas • Thomas W LjBcunty Miert 0. Eficksofl • C. Wbodrow Love • Clarkson Unctey • Thomas Maple. Jr. Um MINN(TONKA June 24, 1992Permit Application No. 92-llQ Applicant: D. T. Madge 875 Forest Arms Lane Mound, MN 55364 Location: City of Orono, Sec. TAB, Forest Like. Lake Minnetonka Purpose: Alteration of the floodplain to modity an existing drainageway. Dear Mr. Madge: At the regularly scheduled June 18. 1992 meeting of the Board of Managers, the subject permit application was reviewed. Action was taken allowing the District staff to issue your permit only alter receipt and staff approval of the following: Revised site plan specifying a minimum size of Class 3 rip rap for the approximately 160 lineal feet of drainage swale at a 5 percent slope. . , , . , Revised site plan specifying length of rip rap, erosion comrol placed across the swale, including an erosion control installation detail and identifying all areas of fill and excavation below the projected lOO-year frequency flood elevation of Lake Minnetonka of 931.^ including existing and proposed elevations. . ^ ■ Volume calculations for all fill and excavation below elevauon 931.5 demonstraung no net decrease in flood storage capacity. j • Cross sections of the existing channel including locations of proposed rip rap demonstrating that the project will not encroach on the navigational capacity of the chimnel. Written permission from the applicant's neighbor for work to be performed off the applicant ’s property. Please be advised that the project is not authorized until the above has been submitted to me and you have been notified of permit issuance from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed Distnct. All requited exhibits must be submitted on or before July 15.1992. If these items are not received before July 15, 1992 this permit application will be tabled. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 473-4224. i-d Sincerely, JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC. Engineers for the District f ■ ■ cc: Ronald S. Quanbeck, P.E. bt 'IS* Board file City of Orono JUN 251' r-vr’' r.f- r^- mm 1^ifS >s»PlF- ■’’’'ST r.' HARDCOVER CALCULATIOfCALCUUTIOOflftiSHEEi SOLE ONE) C^Z5>^75-2S0' «M«» / 250-500' 5G0-1G00'#■ E xisting Hardcover in Zone A. House LENGTH '0mm m m. ...X-:.. ~^ir j. : 4 I sp** 'Si c. Driveway M m^- -i': ■-: .J;. v;:v Unsafe- s' b. Sidewalk .,. ./A A. E. Patio / )eck ftii r': 'W'' . AREAS ¥i F.Landscape 7^ AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING 3» G. Other -mM width t s Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone / V« !^r-o SiF. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. i' - S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ,. S.F. ^A^-7-Jg.S.F.B X 100 i“.*? 7 % .‘•iV’ i m-t;., f, ■W’:K-):-v- 'i;, ■ ■^■- -■"'"i -rV;, . . f.-r ^HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEEIL-^^ cKo^.,^,N ■% SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75^^^-250^ 250-500' 500-1000' Si Existing Hardcover in Zone a--'- f! i , » 1 . V «A. H cuse LENGTH lili: B. iSmrsstt-/S mim 1^ '• ■-n c. D riveway D. Sidewalk • Wi.V W m^.. jr t • ‘ •..JL “ . .*>?» E. Patio / )eck F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY , . PLASTIC SHEETING ^vupb K u/euu^ G. ^2. 3gg- poo Total Hardcover in Zone X ss . % WIDTH X t. » • # X X •1 X • ( X /3 X a ■?v J X • s X a •s iL S •i 235 s <^ a .•s c a •s r a s. » • # s. /.A' *.Z2.3 s. DpAU/f^fA9 *■ • •• •• s.• A f 5 ‘ 'X ■/ S.F. ! 6Co •Va. Total Property A rea in Zone ^S.q;l6 2,&(^0 4|n i?5;Oa£» X 100 - /O. ?• ■'"V'' v'-i v»v>« ^ -' • * «M •,•• • • V* HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250C 250-500O 5C0-1QQ0' :xI STING Hardcover in Zone ' ■ -p-y^-' :.' .'P-- ■.''■*■ -^V-: :';v:'-. ‘o'imySm l*-Cir F.Landscape AREAS ^ UNDERLAIN _ BY PLASTIC SHEETING s i. V- * ^ X y*- y xi? X -tig.. ijt y T otal Hardcover in Z one - 2.4 fc r. r;/. T g S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.■* ' t ' S.F,T S.F. S.F. -**\ /r~^. S.F. I ^ S.F. S.F. S.F. S'4-0 X /r-ss ;r 4 S't^K X s i m X X X O------------a ----------------- S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ■ ■ t •-Total Property Area in Zone S.F. B ^ 0 -cA i-T> 4|J / f' P. X 100 K ^ .'7 • / lifiglill>;’M r. Pi mmmu trtf. • • ■ ■ .■■■■•■■ j?' ■;* '-i' v--'^ '• : - , V - UiW' wV . .;-■ .vJv ‘-‘•'■■■■KSi -‘^nl< P / v' Vtit'cr t.1^. >>!!-■•' ' 4^ > ■dfe-:■ *■■• rv r ; t •• ‘^» ■. f .J- VVAT^-p-^U-« M T liGT-Al t- *»• * ^Vm m%'■ 'I r.. T> %r d'. ’• V,' ■• ■>■> «■ V :v ^ i.>-, ; ■: • '.’i.'' ■'• "•'Vi u ‘'A V* ^ i-. - •’*. *€1 .V.-; ' V.. ,'vv ? a; * 'a ^.1..' -r-ri: ^ *. * '»1W' 4 ^S*i€te=TV V.11mMM m »4 f *. i i -■■ y- ft. :■ > '! : ri;"c '_-’ 4 ^ I • ■-, .ii' i.:. »s • ‘ft,- sei C^Aitfr^e- A^P5^V '. Q Wifn^r S^ie^H B;^i.H I"'- •*'1 ' ‘ --^ ••. -..=1 * 0A/0^B.s-7-i4 ^y/ '^rLAiv^'r iV\Artf * 2; . ■ •V*'v. ■>'S ] 1>v/aa.p HcOSfc '' > A' jM||^_,.,^^ i5^ LA'ICGt I A/Aj crT"4^/v/ A m !'.^r: ff ^ . -it * ■■ J- :>:4' tei'- ■ * t, 7/10/1992 rv! n-^HW«»=^r ( V- ,w - :#’■ >■ TOS ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION WE ARE WRITING TO TPPOSE THE AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK VARIANCE #1753 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 875 FOREST ARMS LANE, REQUESTED BY SKIP MADGE. ^ "v 1> SEVERAL ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGING ALTERATIONS HAVE ALREADY BEEN MADE AT THIS PROPERTY; A) NEARLY ALL OF THE TREES BETWEEN THE HOUSE AND THE SHORE­ LINE HAVE BEEN CUT. THIS INCLUDES TREES THAT WERE WELL WITHIN THE 75» SETBACK. THE SHORELINE HAS BEEN MODIFIED EXTENSIVELY WITH GRAVEL HARDCOVER AND RIP-RAP TO ACCOMMODATE A UNREASONABLE NUMBE-: OF WATERCRAFT. THE MAIN CHANNEL INTO THIS AREA HAS BEEN SIGNIFICANTLY WIDENED WITH A POWER DREDGER. POWER PLANT HAS BEEN INSTALLED TO PULL. LAKE WATER FOR LAWN IRRIGATION. «PUMP HOUSE HAS BEEN ADDED) :i 2) ALL THE ABOVE HAS ALREADY BEEN DONE WITHIN THE PROTECTED 75' ' LAKESHORE SETBACK ^ r*') D) *v • 3> WHEN FOREST ARMS LAME WAS EXTENDED FROM THE AREA OF 915/920 FOREST ARMS LANE EAST, AND THE DIRT TRAIL WAS BLACKTOPPED, NATURAL DRAINAGE FROM THE ROAD TO LAKE MINNETONKA WAS PROVIDED FOR. THIS NATURAL DRAI­ NAGE WAS TO PROVIDE FILTRATION FOR RUNOFF GOING TO THE LAKE. THIS NATURAL WATER WAY ALLOWED FOP FILTRATION, AND REPLENISHMENT OF THE SUBTERRiANEAN AQUIFER, WHICH HAS NOW BEEN LINED WITH CEMENT CONVERTING THE WATERWAY TO'* MINI "LOS ANGELES RIVER". THIS UNNATURAL CEMENT WATERWAY WILL ACCELERATE THE WATER IT CARRIES, AND ADD TO THE RUNuFF AND SILTATION PROBLEM FOR LAKE MINNETONKA.. ALL THE NATURAL FILTRATION HAS BEEN DONE AWAY WITH. 4) EXTENSIVE HARD COVER HAS ALREADY BEEN ADDED TO THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION WITH THE ADDITION OF EXTRA CONCRETE PARKING SPACES. THE HARD COVER INCREASE REQUESTED BY THE ADDITION OF A SWIMMING POOL AND PATIO ONLY ADDS FURTHER INJURY TO THE DAMAGE THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN DONE TO THE SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENT OF THE AREA. PLEASE PROTECT THE 75' SETBACK AREA OF LAKE MINNETONKA. Bogor L, Mwiklaa 920 Forest Araie Lane Mound, Minnesota 65864 ‘. J MU \J •. . /ft/Lah /nou^hn^ S'bZ-Ly JUL 1 4 1992 ifv:. % m ■-k', j,'-V n V imwm j-i < ■ f §■ 4"'-- * "Vi imm i^,^ v„; Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator July 15, 1992 #1754 E. Leo Bullock, 2940 Casco Point Road - After the Fact Variances - Public Hearing l^ertineiit Ordinances Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Deck encroaches 1'3" in front of average lakeshore setback line at east corner of deck. ‘eview of hardcover. l^m Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 0-75' = 6,375 s.f. Hardcover = 0 s.f. 75-250* area = 11,050 s.f. Allowed “ 2,656 s.f. or 25% Existing ~ 5,046 s.f. or 45.6% (Refer to Exhibits G and IT. Please note staff has adjusted area within 75—250* setback area) Proposed = 5,046 s.f. or 45.6% Variance = 2,390 s.f. or 29.6% Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) - Side setback variance. Required = 10* f '1 Existing Proposed Variance 9* 9* 1* or 10% . ■ t. r. ;* • • # ■ V*. •• • List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Construction Plan E - Real Estate Listing/Floor Plan F - Survey G - Hardcover Fact Sheets H - Hardcover Site Plan I - Menth Lettei J - 1-2 Photos of Deck (View Impact) Description of Request Applicant*s contractor proceeded with major structural repairs of existing deck without obtaining required building permit. Deck was completed by the time the new construction was observed by the building inspector. The building inspector was completing a site inspection at the adjacent property when the newly constructed deck was noted. Mr. Bullock immediately contacted the zoning staff and Jl' —•'.'if -> i5 A.Zoning File #1754 July 15, 1992 Page 2 iJiS r-'jTVU *I filed the variance application as soon as the updated survey was completed. The deck slightly encroaches the average lakeshore setback lijie. Note Mr. Menth, the neighbor most impacted by the encroachment, has submitted a letter reaffirming his support of Mr. Bullock s variance requ'-'t. Note also that at the east lot line the deck is located 9 instead of the required 10 *. Ploase review Exhibit E. Applicant has provided the original real estate listing information that shows the portion of the second level deck that was recently reconstructed. The inspectors have confirmed that the deck was not expanded. Hardship Statement Please review Exhibit A. As Mr. Bullock's statement notes the shape of the lots and the fact that all lots are located on a curve or cove of the lake a slight encroachment of the average setback line has no real impact on the views of the adjacent residences. Issues for Consideration 75-250' setback area consists of 45.6% hardcover. 744 s.f. or 6.7% is landscape area underlain with plastic. Applicant has advised that because of the sloping topography landscape areas underlain with plastic have been installed along the sides of the house to prevent drainage problem. Are there other areas of non-essential hardcover that can be considered for removal? Any recommendation of approval must contain the condition that applicant obtain a penalty building permit for construction of decV, pm V V- ? ■ • ' . . / ; i.■mxm *7 ■> ' ' C‘ - % ‘Vi. 'W- • AI Iter - TV- t M: y "w '•) i1 V- *- -j' m K' ■ ■ -v" •te » ^ v I KT‘ %■ ^-.1- ■i*% CITY OP OROHO - VARIANCE APPLICATION n !i Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional vari^ce) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 J (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) ». t. •• t i i s=:wi3 ■ Sr. ^ FROPBRTX INFORMATION Site Address Z^¥d 71 /^aJ~ Or<ryti>^/ , 'V3 Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) -//7 ——^^3'^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required sur^^. Date Property Acquired_ _ _.i / j ^ _(month/year) L'lry ^'C*w 7i C* I (357(do not) also own the adjas;»nt parcels of land. I jltfllU-*- C/l I -IWi- 'U ^£7^ J50’.t>C) V . w Present use of property; \fA tJimI Xm t .UU’I » ^ ^ residential other(specify ’* w*/*‘L VO r.. 7 UAki.V’ VTjII it^rnvi I wu n.;i^'^wrwfc-‘wvv'.i av»a # wn/*“ Zoning District_______________________ Oc/i'd/! APPLICANT Phone (home) C [ X ~ ^ 1 f ^ ^ Name ^ t.AAT^.ss-.‘2/9 ‘/o G^SCr. H>/U Orollo. Zip: V OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) u:‘,Name Phone (work) Address:City;Zio; DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST - - - - ^ Estimated Construction Cost $ J r Describe request in detail: VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback; Lot Width Lot Coverage Front _ _ flardcover Side Rear _ _ Average Lakeshore Other (specify) .V Phone (work) ** ^ i \ •iHARDSHIP/DBSCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical .difficulty and unusual property , ints:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _^ ^.AAru.<i^ _ conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code re^quiremen • U/X-^ c>vt<^ Ui^ uSoyri ------ ] J (attach additional sheets if necessary) inforwation must be submitted by the application ao.aune Hate la order for your application to be considered_c^letet \ thlV uVt from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center ^'348-3271). Completed Application Form ■certified Property Owners List of owners within 150- (you must obtain 1T0O1T odl 11 dm on) • • % ^ ^ 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 6. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8% xll ). 7. -As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list o£ any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff, The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour variance application is not complete if the abo^ •in’Pomation has not been included. .R.V' APPLICANT•S SIGNATURE . The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (star time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correc^ to t^ his/her knowledge. Date /ffi^Applicant's Signature OWNERS SIGNATURE . ^ ^ jt 4-v, v The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and furtner authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification qiS-j^his ^j^equest. Owner's Signature c. ^ f- - - Date ^5 lllkL Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 <3ays before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held ^ third Monday of each month.* Applicants mast be present at all scbedu^iea review meetings of the Planning Cooinission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building S Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. V - • ■i » -• s ■ y ft*. i.-'••. •-» jr.-,-. .., 1^ * T - » - f ' . ^ *• •• .• y:.'- ■ - : i .a5 u - ■ . • ■ ' ■ 'r> - v' .- •»••.• • • 4: * 1 .* ■» • • • • fi*' V^^""'*'''^'-n 1 i .' •. •-- « . r - .T^. . y >-r ' • • * *i'r C^yy ••. ^J s \ •1 \ tAn I'l .rt'ir - — —~ - - -- iv* ■ r0- mm H O TJ z > S »> X 2 on TJ m ^ m > » \ -< > > m Z o o ;o > o o 3» 73 m -^S5e^$§ZZ ^ ny T3 m > 30 - 2 > m z o o » > a a z pa » m H O -DZ > S » > X 2 o z ri ^ m > » \ -c > > m z o o s > oo 3» :o rn H gZ > 2 a 5 X 2 oZ a m *o m > 73 V. -< >> m z o o » > oo 5 aXI m '.V a: rs> X z o w s: sO rv> Q» >* •< X X >o S!!I5g5isH O »H o o > > r-a I 3 5^ g Z o M •DO# O fs> o r- O iM Ul M X iN> -n o w > >o a o>-< isj C- m so rg N4 o rv > X a roH o m M o>g;<0 . X a a o M > nO -<> n O Q Q OB 9 @ >o J is> C. C- O W M OB m ni> a. a 08 r> H O H H o ^ > .1 J O •• O M 0 O O M 2 0 n •-• ^ > M Q» < fvj Z Z »0rsi o m m M > (/j {/y o HO O > > X X • C/> H* ui ^ o 3 a w X o ^ a X o M O > Z O V4 01 >H . O H» m»‘"3So 3^§'^ uri 2 a X a w w H a m o M •< ►» O »-• O w Z ^ ^ a w H a o M m H o "'C ' * 'f 's- ^‘^4^3 % 2°5C5ra a a o rs> o M »-t o M In »-* 01IH . . , _sO M M M H a 2 0 O > -i O o S a ^ x° M am 2 n a a o M O > B> > H X X o Ia r* r- o n» H o \M Ui m in a H a o* oi o o M so > M M O Z O H O 04 a VI o f ■\i f Efci: 1*1 -.’vi' W-Wm. Kw ku;. . X rs> c. C. o VI > so a rvj <9 -< H a 0# so N o a _ H > •< a o fs» HO O > > 0# Z 1 </)>•-• ZOoaoM 2 o Q H > H S M to I a 2 2 o iv> O »-« 0 O VI 2 X X o w > sO M M -< X^ r- I- rs» 0> X rj X 2 o VI > sO CM OB N M r" r- ^ > M M M fNB H o > > O > > Z Z IV> M Z o X X O M2 o HX X C b I a m m o fo . O Z Z O VI in 2 m rn a VI VI -1 -< -< o M H VI m m so No VI > X X O fNBH o m rn o > > Z Z Iin H H _ M 2 o X X o M2 O > H0# ff# in Ia o fNB o m m o VI in »-fvn Z m a VI VI H O H» >0 3 2 M _H* a a m z o O Z 2 H o H H VI X X a o •>qi? K \j^7 <-v' V. X M o o o w p <• ■A'’•V. »'. ^ , fNB OB H OB X X ^NO OB> X X O fN> H O > O > > > > • tn O Q M X O ?C Jk O M 2 o R ^•• 0# 0 Ia o fN>o a a o VI in M ^ __ rs# -< iM a^ so N VI VI > O O VI IN» .'W.• *i i*K'? f» ♦ ■». ■v>- ____O H_ r- r- M H a r- r- 2 o o m m H o X X _ 0^a M X X o > > > H O > > O > > f r“ I 0 r- r* H a O M M o M a a m n fNB H r- r- o V4 inin a c. a VI VI o a o M !2 So mS®2 X N m (A e M > %0 fNB 01 •< ^ f- > ^ NO ^> CD O O fNB H O C > O > > r- 2 Iin r* HI M 2 o Q m o M 2 O o r- ► N o c .y :.'LI# *1 S»« , V a a o VI X X fNB (D »-4 l-« sO X o C. 0# rrt 3 % I 2 X o VI HI fNB OBo o ^ X H* > 09 N fNB m > o n a I » ^O a o H» =>g' 0# O VI 3 3 ■ -..I V-. S V V G C W ~ ' <1 ^ ;■ 1. • h'^.'. 1 1n X V V'^T- > ;/ '^ .. » . . . • ;■ , ' -^* u Oo0» o 5 ffl o \ ►- —- ■ ^ . 4 V« »• - ’ ^ '•-* 'T A, 1 » ^ i ^ t .r.i • ■ t r I . 4» . .di . . «n t'. »■ >.'« . - ^ »/ • ■•'.-*•,■' » ■ = .■'^ • • *’ . ^ ' * »' ' * * v'jf I--■ * •• 1* »•* - •’ *•' * • ■ . *• • V •■' A a * * * ■■ >.'..................•. • 4 ^ '•'.V-v*' . ?' .• • • -r'-r ‘ •..«—44^ - r.;', V-’ ' ' ' ■ . .•. V- -i.-,l“V ■ ' ■ . ■'■•• ■ ■- . -. • ,, - tT.'i-.iidls*' - ■. % • . . . ;i ' 0m * • » *1 •* t _ • ., '1#^ » • 1 • •yOVA'* t ■ 4 ■■ ' 14. s*.' 4 ■ , * •.•■ * '• *.-.v • . • , , •■ -.-W ., ■ ,| a *. * iT ^ -'.I 4 . • .. .A. - • -.;1 V -■'V.. > •■v.- -V ^‘..■..':afc', -: ■ , %. 'i. • ■ ,.*■•. 4 . • -«“ ** .*. * ^ - 4 • />V ’. V ♦■ .i%0 «« ' * * 4^ . r in "O M X n o O X M *T| *n m ^ •o o f. ^ H » m X m » m -4m M -I|3 • 1^'r. 4^/' 4 V*! 4 . V ■• .'• . ■ * 5 5 H m in M X o tJ Q O M 2 fTd Cf. *;f/o m tj X X:3°Xm :. '.V 4^^'A.v /' .. \ . ■■• * ‘"3•?5 .'f. *re?rtw ‘ ii:2;-'.r-■',.r ' 0^3 X:3 m -2 X AV-- -T1 r- O KS o > W ^ X > m -< o O V ■ M O p . yri- m m ^ -n X -4 X ' *.^i' 4.- ' \ . ':v V. V. -^5 M • 4: , ' V . 'V . «• . > M m -V-A '*<• • _ - *' ;'* ■'•t: ■i •. 4 •■•#•. ■ '' •• *” •• ‘v . •* 'f-‘ ■ f- iA-< rt '* '»*i(i‘^4 «/> —i * V V ■ •• '4 ‘ 4 ^• . I 44' 4 t'.- V ■• :•'V- -A * # ’ll. • V -. • r .. -r - y "•*«.>« •• ••» — . . «.. . . ‘ « " -W '»♦• ^ 9 > • , •• • > •■..• : 4 . . •• - ■ *f* » • ^ r;'»4 *4... i ,.^ ■ tT "V. . • •.• 4. » / V . - • - >>• * . '* ^ V- • • *•' ; .. JJi.. .Jr *• ... *n\ *#7^ 1c 4 .'W4. •■ ** .. ' c** ..ii,/ ... • ^ ; c. - -4 ‘ -> . . . . i.-. • r /*. 4^ »•* 4^-*. . w . -• ft. V-t* •• . ; N . .-d*.’ . .' * -4 ••. • “?•' -' 4.-- -4~ - ' .f* ’ f ■ ■■ .'• *■ I* .•-■“* • • • ' , fm, .■•’••■ -1. ..' ■• / - •'.**»■' ^ ; ' ■*’ '• ■■ •'-. -v/ ■■* J. •4 • ./* . . ■ *• * ' '' --T :. -f. •:. ‘ --i ‘ .* M- ' ^ ^ ^ . • Vv , k . ir ->•; ■, .. *• • 4.<-,. . <*,-.-►y/A ^ - 4 • ^ • .4 *' . .% **.'■< * •• , • ..A • ” . ■ V • >• V-* ' : • ' ‘ . * '. ■ • , * '' . - • t" —■ • - ■ ‘ • - . 4- *i . .. , ■ • . - • • .•.>*• ' ■' ',■ ..i'v / .-• • • •, • . . ■ . '■ .• ■,=■/* ' A* * ’ ,' •.•4 . •' 4 -m *■'••• ..4*. ./ . . r. *■ 4*-* ■t - — U-1 I. ...... .•*i 4 . >* t» ^ ‘. V-,. f ^4 ■ '» ^ ■ t *^5 , . • » ^ * • **. t .« t. , ■ ' ■>! 1 fd . - A. • '-i ••.. • * -. - 'iCIt i ^ /# .. ir .;'. f. 'w.r.* ' • * . .3:.,. v '•■■• ' - • :• • • V Se.;.' A' A’ - n A /r4 Vo.' ■ ‘w V C G .*•» w */. • ‘'O'v>C;. •.- A AT, » *"-■ *■« '■WW^" - y,"- • I ^ t •** ^ - * : l//;y^c^ ^ S^rjHAZ /^A-b^sh' /3f n' -r v;h n 1 i• t 1 »• 1 i 1• i i , •t 1 1 ft i . ‘ •A -. V'' ' ,•■ '> ■• ■ ;: :M', ^V V 4 t ! I ; I P^^;V -;' — • — I t J ! 1 1 I 1 i ft• i 1 ! i : ^! i t ( ! * ! ! ! iI—r—* : * » » L ^ 71 \. i ! __u i I : ‘ :: 0\ • i !: i • i :"~0 ! i . I . * » ——4-*»—»»• » i ■?' ' ' ■' ' ' ' .1 - . • .-. • 1 f 4 t . 1 1« 1 1i : .!_= i { 1 k y/ ^•i-» V •/J, " • I ! I ; • I I i h ■: I •TV ■M-.’;■^1 I 'X- \ Vv • • t..' :.. ^.-.v;■-1 Hi w ^ 0 A f • HARDCOV'R CALCUWTIOII S'ORKSHEE « •- •.# « f -* .|S5-iV''\'-'.;i sEfsACK zo;ie: (circle o:ie) 0-75' -^5-250;; 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone. 4-V • ‘ --v- Oi ' " ■ I mm B. Garage 2-2 c. Driveway Sidewalk hjcxL 3atio/Deck ^ I 0 F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN PLASTIC SHEETING (o Other X > WIDTH • / . '$ ZU Zo < -■ 22 ‘7C J2 ^0 Total Hardcover in Zone Total ^Property Area ' in 2!cne VC /-S- ' ^ r T - ! 0^ r2.5 }2 0O 6^8 ui^ WT^ J or, 20^0 33^ 2li i^o S.F. S.F.'■•\ • V» • ;/ S.F. • r I . . w : A ‘ •.r'© = S.F. S.F.w S.F' S.F. > II S.F. Sc ^(9 S.F. iir : S'J/- S.F. B r -|T| X 100 = ,y C.53 Vo ’l. ' ■ i . .1 ,*. - -^*-r -Vi « %r./ C? t ^ r ^ ^ r- ♦ *•- C3 / ^/I c*o^ i I 1^ ^v*as^sv-:. # ■> :- ■WyT ■• »i.-1' *■ ■> >^- rpi , f '• ♦ ~- ;—/i'—i >^2 a TliiL, II' ^ r •'• I.-’^^-PaA; A^V > - :—^J- -«*S£ i4c)u jg, (P I [p'l 5^ 4 r'- k ^ ^ J osL. ‘ i :_■ ^ •■* fe L. . • /• *-i■m ■^Am^ .Lj I ■ ■ ••li: J T!r^‘i4f 3^- 1' J^^iriii^im<r. £^-fe .1: •. A ^;; ■ s * . V ; .■'f * /t •■“>-./ •< iiU’^rr^v ?a§•./ aw■■ -»* 'wt'' ji. is s-^*i‘ns*c::•?. ' : ■ June 25, 1992 ‘ ’ h^Jc i-'-vf-;'!, \f imM -=,..i/'-■# -t ■} ::r^-■ r. r- ............. •f KpK Xv-V.l /■ ORONO CITY COUNCIL 1335 South Brown Road " Orono, MN. k i M I'* %:m jM m 3.ISv 4' vV.v-rftKMIjM*',.m♦' : -5? Orono City Council Member/ To Whom It May Concern j;. ilS^H ’ ^ V-?;' Vsv -V immm f. %;■% My name is Marvin Menth and I live at 2930 Casco Point Road, Orono, Minnestca. My next door neighbor, Mr. E. Leo Bullock, who lives at 2940 Casco Point Road, Orono, MN. has applied for a Set-Back Variance. Please let this letter serve as acknowledgement that 1 have no objections to the variance. ■‘ !>« .• Sincerely,s^m- Marvin E. Menth 2930 Casco Point Road Orono, MN mm les-.V-r r■ pf:^ Vv BP i||p y WyM ^ , rj TTv^.»ik.-rf *t-J^*%- -V =2i|®N v»V •>£; AM ■■ • -4/' , .^-..V v<> » «.'«■>—J .‘-fjj r^' S-V%' 3 % /. ^ ; ■ ' • ' --^1* ‘ ' ^-v • >» -aif^: I -•■■ yv^-: V •' ^ V>>y. •: W. > & MV #;' '4pr \ W : .• < > 5^ '• \i r^i-vi V- ®-'^‘§if ■! -7 * mm •...,>- .A—'.w^ ir 1 1 'jjM-i- .•r •*; I ■"'■M*-.'': - V -y f • .* ' » »♦ ^ • * ^T* ■, > •'• ' " - *^i i , • .*■ ' '“* J - .v.'ll V/y:;'i ■ 1- -vj ■fH’*■Ifb ,W*• . ^ >:ii / 7;g ... -A,*'..- . ^ ; y .. V t> T *■ - >> >$ s % £■ * IP%,.. • . ■■ * ’ * i * '::.: ^-A:,•*■-■v:.v: ll^i ^ -A AvvvJS m ^rv~- -’ »VT — mm:f^rni f ./*« „ ... ; . . ^ V ,V\ ;v >v .'. ■ .'-^A44. *.. X Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator :.;mWm .... .. .■ ■ -'f y , •.•:;•.■ ;.:' 'mm .1 Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator July 14, 1992 . i ‘ t/ V / ■ . -V :.••• r- .^V-Vr/ #1755 Leonard Niska, 2304 Shadywood Road - Variances ~ Public Hearing ■?-'••’:.jjjiji^■tf^. w '\ ^ The applicant has been out of town for the 1-st .-^^-^J^e^as unable to attend the that the public hearing hasbeen sent to -11 -«-^ted property e>a ^l30 been««ci* o^aaw ww —7. i”V 1 =4-o‘t- rfa--e” Property owners have also been advised*that they will receive written notice when the public hearxng Is ^fbe rescheduled before the Planning Conunission. . ■ A! , y 'I'' ■ ., 'Tr m --.> : rT\.-vTs»5-" ani 7-^r 7 -i''^ Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members __ Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator ^:£TJC=36 Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator July 14, 1992 #1756 Robert E. Wilson, 4156 Highwood Road - Variance - Public Rearing Pertinent Ordinances El' -K '. ii':.$m Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) required. Required “ 10* Existing *» 2* 9" Proposed « 2* 9" Variance =» 7'1" or 71% Side yard setback variance r. ^ r- *' ':V.i; ^■'Ml Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - 0-75' setback area = 3,855 s.f. Existing hardcover = 0 75-250' setback area * 7,680 s.f. Existing hardcover = 3,040 s.f. or 39.58% Proposed hardcover * 3,040 s.f. or 39.58% ilList of Exhibits - A - Application : Proper?? owners List 3 Hardcover Fact Sheets ii|^E - Survey Description of Request ^ '4 Applicant proposes the replacement of a screened porch structure. The structure is in a severe state of disrepair. Applicant does not propose an expansion but just rebuilding within existing envelope. No changes in hardcover are proposed nor is the side setback to be altered. V- 'W • Hardship Statement Please refer to Exhibit A. The applicant notes the unsafe and unsightly condition of the structure in its present state. The residence purchased sometime in the 1940's was constructed prior to gras required setback standards and any additions since were completed prior to the City's Shoreland Regulations were developed in 1973 ■ through 1975. V , : . r ■ , V- I rag.-/ • .mi H:... mm ^ V-' -■ ■ ■ V V' A ■ . » i . ''iHw •f>f*-ii /t CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION H ' ' *' Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Pact Fees (Double application fee) 0• * 1K\ •* m • • • t / r-J •• ^7 ^■1 . •• 'do 1 rrrv nr rzniin VrX I I U** rry-MTC rrrrrc ••m. J Cl IIvArii"!/* w'UVC. VV'w V 1 ni rryuu#tV A UUI rvcry nli. frr/*>• w 17* ,*)») i t w i.v V. :• h:,. > ; PROPERTY INFORMATION 4KO RofiA- rLTCrOT^TUMiy nc.u4.Ai I ii/nnA i i.*u #2-j575(? iOOi m:2 Site Address 06/26/9 Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) 07//^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired U^. /vt /_ _(month/year) (90/7 I (do) (do not), also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: V residential _ _ _other(specify) Zoning District: ^^ i ^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ .t. I V; APPLICANT Ncune Phone (home) ^ IP. ^ ^ ^ Phone (worlc) M 1 ^ ^ Address: 41 S'Cg* M City: r/ld-U^;4 ' Zip; Phone (home) # OWNER (if different than applicant) Name U)»ic,<0KJ Address; 4/gr^ A/it'hfJrAj fel City;t^W<X/A________ZiP= 5.S - Phone (work) m v;-DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ct> Describe request in « detail: fi^Ji VARIANCES RBQOIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Inside Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DBSCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:...conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Cod< rpo*LiiP=H' y 7^ pA ^ 1% f h- OP'^CY'f'*! f it?' V-iL^ ^KA '' <p/^!//AjA br-z^A . r’liP J. 'A>\A • *2- C fAy ^ c ,■ \/ <2 A'( C /''^ ^n^yk. fp/' ,1 /f V/'/}/-------- :v w v -* 'T— , i,. (attach additional sheets if necessary) ^OIRCT information must be submitted by_the—appli^tign deadline date in order for your applicaMoP_to be considered complete 2l~^Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center ^ 348—327X) • .a,' 3-Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). r ^.r 4. V' Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8% xll for reproduction). ^ u 57 Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy Sh^xll ). 6, Slcetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy xll ). 7. Siteucnes ui. pa.axio v^x- - -- - - - - - - -- - - - j. -i As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8,_ _^Additional items as may be requested by City staff. \-<T The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not __ccmplete—if—the-------ove xnf on has not: been included. > APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ^ The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (sta time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. y Applicant's Signature Date Z ^ OWNERS SIGNATURE , _ The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and ® authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultant , agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of this request. Owner • s Signature .rr.rtr’"::s;.r Office of this change prior to the meeting. -7:;^ 'J .- A..' *1 -i :4 1 i A i •V -‘ N . A ■ • : '' -.i^v - m '\y*Wr' ,i^J^ >‘rm Vt f-)m ' . / ■. -- ’ " >- ,if«uK i>.'■■ ■ k.'«'.-' iT’.'' K-4'/ * 'mm -0y ’■:m \L Mm& 'ORCHARD PL g oJ - I - li »SA -.c ?^RK ^ /y ^ ^ s ^ I ■JfTs k1 r\ t »i: H > ■D » O TJ N •< ill > » \ < > isi •o 73o T> m Tl S3£S o S S o i o 9 > » ^ \ -< > > m z o O 3D > O O Z 30 a m H Q a 2 ?* S ^ > X z 0 i^ii w> X a m am > a V •< > Z a m a m > a \ -c ^ ► 0 X > m 2 0 0 a ^ 0 > m 2 0 0 a > 0 0 M 0 X a a m 0 XXa - m 0 O N ■■■• . , H. ■:*. . : . : • V .^. •■ _ V. .^;- . % t. . . OD ^ a Tj o ui M X Z ^ 0» X> M M Mo r- r- ^ * r- r* o o X M M ^ X M *0 TJ I2o__^m M ■M 2tJS*SS o> a •• M o CD o^ vn m f o H 30 ^ - .'•'. V *•• -V ' ■♦ • V .» V* •* ; ' v' ■•V -/ r • *■.» . • ■.-.‘V ■ r- 1^.. Q O O O I 5 o ^ H z S t XM O O O' a 4> O Q C/> H o i5Si..5xS >2 o z____i: a a M in r- r- 74 _ M M in o X Z 2 ^ I 3 ~ o 2 o a Off- f X X M •. « ^• ^ . ^.» » 0 o - . . “V- -K ? 1. • a o o o ui o in in \M 4N IM a m Q > > Q) 1 in 0 f f at ^in in 0 < < 31 ^in IN 71 m c IN O' a a a ci ^O' 0 0 0 c7 ^X^ o It! < a o o o M I’r. a o o o fV' M C• J: V-V.».*•■ ■ ■ - *.• '.-t •M' •-'••"^'^■ ■■.^^ *:,-;V' itf- .. . SNC', ' -••'■•■•■ ■ * .■ .: •^* •. : 4“' f > *• ^ «* ■ 0 .' .^ * . .'w 'C • *- •* y 0 ■ • . ‘ • • JP • •'■•• • *' *• # t- ' :. §ft • -• - .ft ... . ' V • .->5 'ft* * ,.• , # ..4- M '' ' ' • <4, * - •^\ * 0 • * ♦ • . ^ 4 • * 1 • ' • 4 • . ’ * ♦ * -• i w ■■ ' ■ft ,. • ■ ,• vj' ir;<* • .• r \v.. /V .. ... -v>-'X ' ' ^ ^ O U40» U4 O O M X ^ 2 »H O O I 2 ^ M D* 0« X M M *>4 0001> > X ro M4 -.4* •t 4> a a o w M Q Q X^ CD in o O H*o i/> (/) ino o X z 2 ^ in O in o IN O' a ^ o m m M ^ IN §$ X X o w M > X' 0» «x a > M in ^ no -n in o X •• M >1 S o cn § M > m X M?-<sv •• X rs> •n X IN a o o o ro '.V:‘t *'■: .:■ l. ■■ ■ > -T ■ •“ ' •...*• • ■ if,.-.S'* o c c o ^ a M o o x» OD IN>XXH» in 2 2 r3 ^ in o X X Z *'4 M I O •» t* M X H> a a M ^ Q Q C) I Q o ^ r» IN x^ c. c. o ^ M ^ > X^ Od x^ in o m m IN a a O' a H H o > > :* Ikm ... .. , , ^ v*^ . -. t ‘ 7- . :^r V vv»: . ■■ r J*" yIfi:4-* iS'l.-1. . Vs':jr^ 1 4 . ■• * ■ •rMt:-. ^.4 • 1. / .*■ . * 2 O' a CD M 2 O CD Mm in ni a ^ oHam H -s 2 55 ^ _ r- O I 2 o •• X P4 2 o a X IN a ni f g M H 5 < H m 5 4> in m >in o a o IN a m o o ^ m < fs>- II X ^ X X O w K M m m ^ OD 2 in r- r- O' _ o M M H or2|r-r-^j- X X X M H 8 > > o I ^ o C C 5 M^ ® :S £ S ^IN m m QO' a a 30 o > 4- *» « , *• kl: . *•4'.•,•;■ V/' .., *-'. . w. .'^*..- ■ I : ^— V - ft i- . -• *• ' • r i *■* •'A? i'u» * ' .m 4 . . \ V-. ;!->v< ; •i>*'•i!' -^5 iV6iirwr <!i3.'I tl. ■ ■ '■:, l : v .,4 i F -. ••v.'^- 'vf ^r.m, fc ^ -< ■■^r im -'3. /k o > H O X 4 r i. O o o S j * o« \r^ O' N l>» ►V - »-' •»,.'» i*"' . : %v'. ■ • ^v.r , 'y.i • ‘ •' . ■•/O’ ■• * ■■ - - V ' • , ■'V=^ .''sliiSi:, - ■ -V ■ i '. * , ‘ 9 -# A ^ ’*4 H . .V >,/V tm V ■')"' ■ ’•r • • ' •“ >> ./.T-Jje A ■ M< .* r?*;" 1 » V- « • ■‘a * . ■' > 0 0»M TP fl •1.^V V ■:-' '^i-U '■•i # • ? m *D 3i #^-‘V m JO 3 *‘t^'» M (A Z Mm M 55 H M :52 lA ’H'im -A '■.p' ■ . U'- r ! 1: ■ • , .-ju? • ,* -• 'J.r . ^ ^ ^ ••>■ ,f^- • - • .• f-:;. r •' ■ *f»^» ■ , »^ . ' v*; •• :v ■ ,'. :.»-A H . • •• • ‘ 0 t ..i' V -■• . - - " :■ f^x . -- • -• . '». J “v:-' >^-'- ./i i-. *'.': 1 S^'.' 'V'^:>.? ■ ';.,i• .'*L' rfnrth I i ------ - vv ■/. HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK zone : (CIRCLE'OHE) ^5-25( Existing Hardcover • ' 9* •• A. ' House LENGTH WIDTH « • 1'^ • ^« • • •* • B. Garage • • •. -4 4 • • it-* • DrIVEV/AY •• •* vs><^ D.. Sidewalk 1, \yAh.. _ X X t^v V’.> e. Patio/ Deck '''. ..• •• p.Landscape __ areas R. UNDERLAIN BY ■ T _______ PLASTIC-........... SHEETING » •• * • •V.-A > 'll .Other ■ - T+-* wmi. . • # •»' Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone S.F, S.F. . S.F. « S.F. S.F. S.F. - S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. _ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ';4',D-( m i ir V ^ ;vj S^SS t S.r. d pt^v ■' ■ c^/^.saA^ p/ HARDCOVER CALCULATIOH WORKSHEET ______ SETBACK zone: (C.RCLE 0»6) 0-75' 75-250' (^0-500j) 500-1C0O' Existing Hardcover in Zone WIDTH • • • • 0^ X 1 X mMm I* »•> D.. S idewalk i >rk-. ■js.; • s • •# ■fV F.Landscape AREAS underlain BY ^1- PLASTIC------------- SHEETING _ X m » • •• • - X • i :l- r ■ -. G. Other . X S.F. S • r • S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. . S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 'A S.F. D V- •5^.,'■;• ir'3^ = •t * •./ <ES.V t;m. S.F. 7'. . • • * Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone 2S S.F. S.F.B ■ ■■rsK-io^- ■-i ' •T «». *4 •%! B 2S X 100 v..r m-:aMw m» m-m #••• f*%i^ - - - %-m ■ m-‘^r V *■ y. M ”<vV ’” V V , .\>m Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator “•i Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator July 16, 1992 #1757 Albert D. Hanser, 1685 Fox Street Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Pexrtijsent Ordinance ir> >. •v.,n;.- -/"fe '■W' .■■ % \;te« Section 10.28, Subdivision 3 (A) - Conditional use permit required for continued guest house use of secondary residential structure on proposed Lot 1 within the A. Hanser Subdivision. A condition of preliminary subdivision approval required that applicant file a conditional use permit for the continued use of a guest house structure on the property. The City's files reveal no formal conditional use permit had ever been issued for the use of the structure as a guest house. All regular lot requirements must be met by guest house: .'I'„-v;. Area Required Proposed 4 acres dry buildable 4.02 i Setback from "existing" side lot line Required « 30* Existing = 10' Variance *» 20' structural setback from recreational developme^'t lake Required = 100' Existing = 75'+ or - Variance = 30'+ or - required 75' setback area) liist of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map |D “ Survey of Proposed Lot 1 E - Weckman Memo P “ Septic Map m .-JaoJ r'i -V- pi®S'.' •’ ,it-' mm m 'W V* ,^.‘i:'v^r T •t ';■ i • ^iW ^r- • Zoning File #1757 July 16, 1992 Page 2 ■ .* :v Description of Request. . t r^ ■; .V r. Ir- |jb|; The subject guest house will be formally recognized as a non~ conforming structure in the approval resolution of the final plat for the applicant* Based on the information submitted with preliminary survey, the guest house appears to be completely located within the 100' setback. Any major structural repa5.rs for any expansions located within the protected area will require variance approvals. It should be noted that the non~conforming setbacks did not result from the lot lines created with this three lot subdivision. The guest house shall continue to be used by applicant, guests or hired help. i* r?‘ :vi ■ During the preliminary review of the subdivision, applicant's saptic consultant provided additional information confirming that there is adequate area for alternate septic sites for both residence and guest house. It is the intention of the City to require the installation of a new septic system if guest house use is to be continued. The City has also asked for confirmation of additional areas suitable for septic expansion. Mark Gronberg has advised that the original test site can be used for the installation of the primary system and that the area can be expanded as an alternate site to serve both residence and guest house at a future date. The issue as to when the new system was to be installed was never specified during the preliminary subdivision review. The staff memo suggested a deadline of one year from the date of final plat approval. Review Exhibit E, Weckman's memo requests ninety days from the date of Council's approval of the conditional use permit to be consistent with requirements of septic code. Staff Recommendation CuT.- To approve the conditional use permit for the continued guest house use of the secondary residential structure on the property located at 1685 Fox Street finding that all area requirements for the guest house use have been met. This approval is subject to the following conditions; Guest house structure is considered a non-conforming structure. Based on its substandard side setback at 10 and substandard lakeshore setback at approximately 70 , any major structural repair of this structure or expansion of this structure will require variance approval of the city or Orono. The guest house guests or hired purposes. is for the exclusive use of applicant, help and may never be used for rental i y?.•1 anikt ife CITY OP OROHO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATIOiy # jp I'*7 ' •i PROPERTY LOCATION ;v* 5.Site Address iA Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 03-//7-'l3 -W -^00/ ^ Ot-//7^Z3 ‘3J ^0^7 Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name I A/He/tr i. Phone (home) Phone (work)• t- K ‘'Address /iTA>S fTXfCr City ri-<r±---- OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ fV/*^ ^_ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone mam Address City % Date Property Acquired __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _^ (month/year) I (do) ^(do notT^also own the adjacent parcels of land. f ‘ t YY (jp r>r,r:k}n iv^'. -V.- -.-tS' K-. • • fees ~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more ... . - - Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakesh f L r;f%^;?rr npcjrc f 7vr »X v\/vvv 01 CEH 150,00 CiEiii TL lC/0,00 i RECEiPT-THm YOU 112^^60 coot ROl 706!: p- «'' I Iwm PRD/PID - see fee schedule Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS . n ^ 4.$200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant reesj $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule fi mm. PPM mm iiMii i. . ‘ PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY ti Present Zoning District Present Use of Property /f/e '-/<?WimM f CResidentiaT) Other Tspecify) ^DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obta this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governme Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan^ if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17■ OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses Incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an luthorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning )ffice of this change prior to the meeting. '.W,■> •" il 1tr 2 2 "o j . • / ;. m > » ^ . ► m 2 S ' • g 50 > 3, ' ^ ‘ s ni 5SS®SS -< O •• f y o r- ui o -H nn rv* • * • •> O O * *_ X O ► • *• • i -.;•■ '•■■■■.'■•;■■■:. I .• .-'.li .-.. ■..-.g --; '.' ■ .■: ■•.••■ •■■.•..■.i.v . ^ • • t . *. • • • • r • ' ^ •. . •, E • .» • ’• 3 = V • • ••**' .. •-1: .•! ® • / -r • ' • • • *.* *• j . *•. • • . • ^ g,.♦>. i'-l: V^ ■••*•.•■.»•*••■. ’• ‘ .■•■.'a K^: «. . • - . •••..••••. • . .. . 5 j WSl. . •* * * . • ••*•'• # ^ .HUs^s sssssg s I • .’— - o ' t/l U1 M ^205 -M •: - • ^ i2 •• X V - • C/» Ml ^ S . 2 . •• ui >• M . X S'* . • ® • • •.. - 2 S HS2S . 7 gp m in 5 M • v.**2w1/7 Q •*.•• *H l/> W X ^ ;* ^ -4 H (A ill w "»1*1in ► ► VH 30 30«x> c/> (/> ^M. mm o• o.- • o • IS> T3 M O O O U4 C C O 0» S 90 O r* r* CM M M 9 .55 T -1-4 •-ssst: O I 2 Z 30 ^O O m M 90 9 </> -1 -H t/> IN> S 2 ^ r* m m C X M O g O W 5 09 r- f-5J^55Sp —1 *n >000 IH I M SSI® ^. in U4 m rn t/) 1^ 90 » H ^ •sE5S?=>SS{^ ^ SN O 90 >SI rn 30 o oH (/) o 30 IV* >2 ^ I 2 5 P t/) M 2 m M 2 2 ^ r- Z 01 Ml cS •• 90 IV» 2 ;a m V4 m Ml M r- in o w IH to f- 2 W4 2 V4 > ► p w ^ _ r- r- O 09 f— O CO 03 Oj/j o m rn w jo 2 O O 2 M H H 2 o Ii/> o a ^ M wf;?iiS7 2 rv» m U4VI Mb.M___o m m m m fs> 2 90 2 c/3 M ^ o to o 2 2 to vO ^ S. e oo o so » r- H» _ m 2 o 2 > o o >22^ 2 2 O 2 ►-» Ml lAto 2 iM 5 oS o CO o (O IM Ml O m o 2 “ m O 0 • f- H O > HO • * > >• •o .0 g: M to c/i o w ► ^ C C p -< ► IPrsi in o o^ mo H *n 2 2 M4 > O « X > > »-• 3 M NI 22 t/3 s: — o ^ T r» »S H m M4 in .- • g « fi> ^ 2 n p o w o 30 2 M» 09 r- > ► -Nj CO 09 ^ o 00000 5 X o 09 Ipl <n§>*>§v g i/> CO rs> 2 U« > > o IM •o IT* f“ r“ O CD r— o o o otn o m m tM 2 2 0 0 2 Ml -1 -1 fV> 2 o I000^ M» to to to m 0 2 2 0-^ in m > > o I T rr X ^I a m \M O m O O T9 Ml ►- m m CD to t/9 ooo l#4 • •* • •• • • , •••, *'4*V o oo M 'f ** • •« • ^ * *• • \% -Z « % t • - • •* , XT . . ^ J** S=?C5 .o m m m v>IN, ;a » JO w w ’■■ ■•■ i®. P O . to oCO x» R. - c • fn • o 2 M 2 2 O P Ml Ml M* III •< O O 0 X' M m 2 = f5 _> > > m o H -n 2 2 ro > o O o I X ^2 X Xz to g ^ TJ 2 X Imm fs» g 2 CO m m X -1cn ‘ • Ml Ml in S 55 ^ ^ S “ o . 9- 2m 2 o '•5 2 r — ^0 0^ i '•"•;.■ o5 .m • T'': ,. •- -1.-.-*' * ' ' *- •••. i . *• • * * * *^ .•**'» - - - - . • .*. ■' •••.* • ••• * I"* • "1 . iZ- ••-!■ ^'••• •*. * * • t ‘ •* - ^ • *. w- .*2 .. M • ,,V * X ** r,> «. - • • • s» • 9 ^ •• ^ • *- "iTT “^’^• * * •.• s %■ / * .:•.-* *.• *.• ✓*, . •» •• • •.—*• . • • • •• M £■ •:*. — •".. • •J’ »* S - ’ 2 • • • *•» . “ • • • •, • •• • • » • • ^ •* . V. ••. Vi: ' *•* *r • - • •• " .• •• ; «. •. •* •' r„. ••>» • «• • • « • ♦ • • • (•I ••; •' *• » Jilt r * •- •.• • • •t- mm-if x'' Jeanne A. Mabusth, BuilJ^ng & Zoning Adninistrator Stephen Weclcnan, On-Site System Manager July 15r 1992 SUBJECT: #1757 CUP - A. Hanser - Septic Review alternlte^sitVs® for^bo4 the“gSlst hoLe^'^nd thrmain'’residence! ^rcr^ched Within 75- of the existing gues^^ se|t^c%7s\er n?n-conlor ”fn\ based on the shoreland regualt^ and reviLd spetic code requirements. f 1992 review for the subdivision request that additional testing as rhrata!.^=n\“ ort\"i^%^^st\^^g f^tlc s^tem^with the^inst^^^^^^^ i^*"'°i!ft!c“sL" r.rtt:tiT3o t^% «rt!=^%"t"eV^or ?h°rguest house must be replaced within 90 days of the approval of a CUP. Mark Gronberg has been <=°atacted regarding this issue and soil testing information already provided and previous inspections of the property in q"®stion, the drainfiel^^ should have no problem in treating septic effluent affective y a ''m. ■ ■• •:s ► -' t m s4,';,’‘>-■:WSm : i •r'l : >. ‘ •is »i ■ .yi.f ^ 1 i % 'i*T: f''^%‘ -- ■'<4;.'■■■''" ^<r j?- -1 ■1 mm U't ••> 'i:i j:v»f.. .vV/ '. 'l*B^y '■{<•<. TOS FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Stephen Weckman, On-Site System Manager July 15, 1992 #1757 CUP - A. Hanser - Septic Review m <:U A Septic testing is required for this parcel indicating alterp^^te sites for both the guest house and the main residence. During the review of this subdivision by Jean Mabusth, it was determined that the ordinary high water level of Lake Minnetonka encroached within 75' of the existing guest house as well as the septic system for the residence. This encroachment makes the septic system non-conforming based on the shoreland regualtioxis dnd xr©visGd sp©tic cod© rGcjunroinGnts# J©©n not©d xn licir Mfixch X2f 1992 review for the subdivision request that additional testing T'U3t be submitted indicating a second alternate drainfield site for the guest house as well as the abandonment of the existing septic system with the installation of the replacement system using one of the alternate site, fox year of the final subdivision. In order to be consistent with Orono Septic Code Section 12.30 however, the septic system for this guest house must be replaced within 90 days of the approval of a CUP. mm • . ' Mark Gronberg has been contacted regarding rhis issue and indicated that the two alternate drainfield sites for the 9“®st house as well as the alternate site for the main residence should be feasible and will submit an addendum identifying these sites on the property survey. As per our discussion, best way to acheive adequate sites for sewage treatment would be to have one alternate site for the guest house while extending the other alternate site already designated to make it large enough for both the main residen - as well as the guest house. Based on the soil testing information already provided and previous inspections of the property in question, the drainfield sites should have no problem in treating septic effluent affectively. ■ . ’ Vv • • •• * •S' '■■'i .W •r mm: wm U • M SIS' |174f JaMS r. Lawranea, ISSO llxtli Avaaoa «orth - Pxalialiiary tubdlvlaloa 2. liOO p.B. loain« Coda Aaandaant Itandarda forBaaldaatial Boeka tfcat Caploy Styrofoaa for Flotatlo ^rpos«9 Acnoa xwai - Aavlao of thaaa itaaa ulIl eeaMim Pfto' 5? ” aebadulad pubUe haarinya. Applleaata praaaatiap oarlaaeo rayaaats bafora tba CoaaUaloa axa aakad to aw ta ^,0 IB ^ jObrUif Ml ft~> •;V4-fci In f0 dlT-aJ/i W tba cbaab a ra 3. IU4« 4, 11747 I174< *1730 U7S2 IITSJ I17S4 I171S •17SC •17S7 tba padiM a* tba froat of ' bp tba Cbairaaa. S. *. 7. I. t. 1*. U. 12.?iSS?i2iaI^*f.ii!t ^“?»bur»alrii.y Tboaaa and Maryarat tcaa. 2430 Want lafayatta Boad Variancaa - Poblie Poarlny John O'SolllTaa, 2420 Shadyaood load - Aanawal Varianca - Public laarlny lob lovland. 1243 north Ara Brlva - Conditional Baa Parait - PubUo Baariay Charlaa and (hirlay Pyla, 3340 lay PUea - varianca - Public Baariay Caorya ». Balwait, 4243 Poraat taka Briaa - Varianca - Poblie Baariay Skip aadya, 075 Paraat Ana Lana - Varlaaea - Public Baariay I. too Bullock. 2540 Cameo Point Bead - Varianca - PubUe Baariay taeaard Blaka. 2304 Bkadyuood Band - Varianca - Public Baariay - *a ba Contianad at tatar Data Bobart B. miaao - 4154 Biybaoed Boad - Varianca - PufeUe Baariay p c. 9 CL, j»/ , ^/7</f L5GAL i)£SC»IPnO»: Lot 4. 3lock I. rANGLEUOOO This survty intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of an existing house and garage thereon. :t does not purport Show any other i-eproveaents or encroachnents. j Inn n.ipser Dataa: Mean sea level Scaring*. sm«n are Oased upon^ _sn a?_siine'l d-iji;.*! PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR JIM LAWRENCE OF LOT 4. BLOCK 1, TANGLEWOOD HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA ■T m;- .''■■..mm mmm p.C. fvrt^ # I _ ♦ rlL.fl// \ ';.v;/i,^ \\' \ \ LJ5AL atSCaiPHOS: Lot «. aiock I. rANGLgUOOO to show the boundarfes of the above descrioed ono-rtv 3 tnn n-irker Di'us: Mean sea level 3ear 1 na ■: sf, 1 ,n a,■ a pa>:«J_upoo n aizn-^el _<U♦ un PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR JIM LAWRENCE OF LOT 4, BLOCK 1. TANGLEWOOD HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA m V “|ls|l-jt;!i JirLiJ ■,-=='J5:i:|6-iiJ;iD j^j9rfz9 f-T— Sli j|ljsfiiiii«t|i5f, Kiiipytos j !® y»* V>» Of €09 m lilt V ^^:ir,*^''v'lli *4 0»9/ x-.c; \\ • iafs:c:^:i- \4mili€i^ fmmMsm 'J- f i I I "■■■ ■: , ■ ', ..i^ .:- - " • -iji. •1 r‘‘ W . .. ; - ■•■■■--^’^ “ ivK'jifeg *wm 5l \ 1 I ',• I i 7*^0 -fj. 7- •* ns^ <'- X ■-VX<"!V-'-'';^^f, '-,\'y'\.\ ''X ' -Xi \ '■■••' , ■m>< \i?x. >drainage ditch I2‘ WIDE. 3‘ DEEP.3 I SIOESLOPES PLACE RIPRAP ACROSS DITCH TO MAINTAIN 3' DEPTH FOR STORAGE CAPACITY AND FILTRA'^ION. EASEMENT TO BE 5'MORE ON EACH LOT ^ CONS-^RC'CT ’i'W\ CIRCLE ‘TO \ MISS LKfTSTA.- NG storm seres .-ONSTR.CT C3. ON R£\- •> T -EXISTING C.3. F0R£ST AftMS L AFE a d. mm 1 41 ‘ 1-^0 fjl- #7- *ns^ m a ir«n m0nu0**>vt Bror^jt s/>»-^ •rrom*J StM of mnn^ioXA/ County of HaBMpla) •aid eeuafty and atata, pa Mho a*a«itad tha forapol* ,31W .‘i^ X kara^ aartlfjr tkat I • la a aairaat Hf»«■■*•* a faati tkat •U,**" riaa ara aarraatty fcair =:• Staia af Itiaaa^ :~v Caaakf af iwBaplB) ft for aald aaaaty aad atat :fV fti- ?*-*tsr2S.tkaraof kald thl hO 'p.c. 4t q. ^ o a* 4-» t. t. v» o o o x: o. •o u c a; w 3 *0 O 0 c *° c VI 01 lo a> £ c ♦-» Qj -o o oii i= £ M • o» W» 0 C OJ 4-» 4-» M (/> U XJ-* 0> CKO. 0) 01 O •M i. c c o> — « o» >*0- c 01 ii il liif ll: fi? "S VI <0 Xku 01 01 t» « 6 e c o ox; > c »-« 3 0 0 M •• I 4-> T3 M « « ]c o c o #N •f •