The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05-18-1992 Planning PacketJ » - •«v, ' 'j*'^JiT :t' u. V : V > PLANNING OOHMISSION MEETING MONDAY, MAY 18, 1992, 7:00 P.M 1275 BROUN ROAD SOOTH - COONdL KV'f COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - J. Diann Goetten ATTENDANCE ULBD PUBLIC HEARING ^ 1. 7:00 p.m. mm i, #1732 Joan Sweetser, 845 Old Long Lake Road Preliminary Subdivision 2. 7:30 p.m.#1734 John Burger, 3750 Bayside Road - Preliminary Subdivision ACTION ITEMS - Review of these items will commence prior to or ''f. ^ c- ^between scheduled public hearings. Applicants presenting variance requests before the Commission are asked to move to the podium at the front of the Chambers when their application is announced by the Chairman. #1679 William Miller, 2691 Casco Point Road - Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing . V f. #1724 .%■ Tammy L. Woodis, 2818 Casco Point Road - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing ;#1729 Clair Rood, 3280 Navarre Lane - Residential Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Continuation of Public Hearing #1731 Clair Rood, 2215 Kenwood Way - Variance - Public Hearing #1733 If- ^mr ■ Temple Israel (Camp Teko), 645 Tonkawa Road - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Th-. IPmm Pwi 8. #1736 Gregory C. Peterson, 1920 Shoreline Drive - Renewal Variance - Public Hearing #1737 Richard Hollander, 680 North Arm Drive Variances - Public Hearing ■ 9J m -rt. A >A AiWA ^■■ ■^ PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, MAY 18, 1992, 7:00 P.M, PLANNIH6 CONMISSlOH COMMENTS 10.Report by Planning Commission Representative to Council Meeting of May 11, 1992 (Ed Cohen & Stephen Peterson). 11. Status Report by Lake Use Committee Representatives. 12. Status Report by Facilities Committee Representatives. Other issues. ADDITIONAL ITEMS 14. 13. Planning Commission approval of minutes of April 20, 1992 meeting. .5..^pS'l &:j| 15. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the June 8, 1992 Council Meeting. ADJOURN 'V f..- m tmmm 5 ' 1^; mm /:■,_:v:.v^..yyV r'-' 'A'l -X. m - - ' , 'i il * > \ ^ S' '' •’Sr?aKisMiife:-. mm -a. ^ Mm w^mm '' ■' ' ^ ^ &r4 mm 'M\V *7 :'i .■m -.m ■' -Vi, jfi ■•*. . *1 ;■) i ^mr >■. Planning Coirjnission Council !W ■:>'■ -■k:4 CITY OF ORONO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) ^ 1. D<x\ri^l(>j U ^r2.dta i) fp/M I 2. f^A,)r-^s:. 2, JoH<vi r>{ f^\?> ^ 4. 5 ^4-uJ.u (M ^.y7o X «r» fv>-i :V" ■• . . •■•■* , - --'•7. --*-.• - '. -k 7n. \ t •■■i = ,c.,.^ •V, ♦rr ■ I?:/'r mi L To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Prom: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator May 11, 199T #1732 Joan Sweetser - 845 Old Long Lake Road - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Class 2 - Public Hearing •</ Pertinent Ordinance ifr- I® -sc Section 10.28 - RR-IB, Rural Residential Zoning District Required area *= 2 acres Total area of subject property = 9 acres Proposed Lot 1 = 2.6 acres dry Proposed Lot 2=7 acres (5.5 dry, 1.5 wet) Chapter 11 - Class 2 Subdivision I ♦•rf ^ -iSft. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Map of Ownership of Adjacent Properties E - 1 and 2 Septic Mapping for 1987 Subdivision Application and Septic Report F - Gaffron Letter 6/21/90 G - Abandoned Well Record 4/14/92 H - 1987 Subdivision Application I - Current 2 lot Subdivision Application r- .-'i ' - Review of Current Application r' In 1987 the applicant had applied for a 3 lot subdivision that received a recommendation of preliminary approval from the Planning Commission in May of 1987. The applicant did not proceed any further with the review of the 3 lot proposal. Applicant has now filed a subdivision application proposing a 2 lot split. Original septic test information provided for the 1987 review has been accepted for the current review. (Review Exhibits E-1 and E-2.) Since the plat was filed, the applicant has advised that an adjacent property owner, Bruce Dayton, will combine Lot 2 with his contiguous properties to the east. (Review Exhibit D.) Staff has advised the applicant that she has two options for preliminary subdivision to either proceed with a 2 lot plat or as a lot line rearrangement. Both surveyor and staff concur that the subdivision must proceed as a plat because of the need for dedication of road for Old Long Lake Road at a 33' width. The applicant should consult with the prospective buyer to determine if the buyer wishes the lot to be an independent lot for future sale or shall the lot be included as part of the comprehensive Dayton land jiilii - --- -i. »- -• - • ■ .X •j ■’ r^: ■ k: Zoning Memo #1732 May 11, 1992 Page 2 holdings for future development. (Review Exhibits J and I.) There is a dry contiguous corridor at a 70' width where a future road can be installed providing access at Old Long Lake Road and a 100' corridor along the east side of the property providing a dry land base for a connecting road to the eastern properties. If applicant proposes a two 2 lot plat, the City must ask for drainage and utility easements 10' along the exterior of all lot lines and 5' along the interior lot lines. Staff would require that the wetlands be designated at a specific elevation on the plat w.ith the City obtaining conservation of flowage easements over the wetland areas. If the subdivision is to be a lot line rearrangement. Lot 2 is to be redesignated as an out lot. Drainage and utility easements at 10' width must be designated along the lot lines of Lot 1. As for Out lot A, drainage and utility easements are to be designated 10* along the street and west lot line. The City shall not take drainage and utility easements along the east lot line at this time but shall wait for a future subdivision. This will eliminate need to vacate interior easements at time of future subdivision. The wetlands can also be located and designated at the time of a comprehensive subdivision of the properties. Both Lots 1 and 2 meet the required lot width at 200' plus at the 50' street setback. All existing structures meet the required setback for the two acre zoning district. Former guest house at 718 s.f. has been abandoned and has not been used for habitation for over three years. (Review Exhibits F and G.) The well has been abandoned per the well record information from the State Health Department. In our recent inspection, staff noted that the well pit has not been filled in nor has the existing septic system to the south side of the residence. It will no longer be necessary to require the plumbing to be removed as long as both well pit and septic system have been appropriately abandoned. The following are conditions that must be included in your approval recommendation: Dedication of 33' of right-of-way for Old Long Lake Road. Former guest house structure on Lot 1 can never be used for residential habitation as lot only contains 2.6 acres. Prior to final plat approval the well pit and septic system that served the former guest house must be appropriately abandoned. Depending upon applicant's resolve concerning whether the plat shall be a 2 lot plat or a lot line rearrangement, the following conditions will apply: ■m-' - .. ••■^ Zoning File #1732 May 11, 1992 Page 3 a)If a lot line rearrangement: i. Mp;'‘ .1^: Lot 2 to be designated as Outlet A and must be legally combined with future owner's properties to the east. : m ii.Drainage and utility easements shall be designated as follows: Let 1 ” 10' along all property lines Outlet A - 10* along street and west lot lines 2 lot plat; «1.Surveyor must designate wetland at a specific elevation. ftH'V ii. City to require conservation of flowage easement over designated wetland. iii. Drainage and utility easements to be designated as follows: .. V„ !5. 10' along the perimeter of all property lines to be excluded along the sides adjacent to wetlands and 5' along the interior lot line. WP".'- W'-MJ im ■■■•..«%■ ■■ V--«^ 4# / I- -'■■ 3.1^18k>;'. ’ , ».=v/ .1 >> I'V- 7 - K •>: •«. -liis*r•V*. w^m.r-:.:r Uhl i . r J r-. r;.CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION AIPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 3? r-^ZT./ r 7^. I.D. / *? —2 Property Identification Number (P.Y.D.) v5-^-///'^ Please check one ^ Property _ _ abstract or _ _ torrens? 0^3 f/ Attach legal description to application APPLICANT Name Phone (home) "7 - *J~0 4^ _ _ Phone (work) 4^7 3 ^ : y City; Zip^^ licant) Phone (^ome) Addr^s OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (work) Address: _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ (attach list if more than one) City:Zip: EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels / Development Size 1. CITY OF CROtiO .... ■ H 7 Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land i3S<mmF%M i uCt^h 111. I fL.t.n .• w w - - -u u...,, , ..W.v'.#. VAcres Total, all parcels tw Present Use (check)t/ ^^40110 cool Residential; no. of units- Other (specify)____________ I Present Zoning District L. -- ! fi PROPOSAL s/ Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:I I Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use; (check) JL Units per 3A(Acres ^ *7 / oL 0 Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land 4- Residential Other (specify) r^-y 'I m MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARYr FOR COMPLETE P^^^SiI^SSy^ '7%'f ^Od PLICATION 1. & 4. Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A~603^Govt Center 348-3271). fhOS (Ui:^ Ks an atidendum to this applicationr please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date_ __ FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III)$200.00 t:Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement 4 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) 300.00 300.00 Preliminary Review (Class III & all non-residential ) 325.00 "+• 25.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 175.00 -9 Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Pinal Subdivision Application 150.00 100.00 ■’3 The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning COTtmission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. 1 ■.V' •• V : :i': •V. : ‘i .11 Ci 1 Applicant's Signature A _ _ _ Date ^ 3 , ^ ^ Owner's Signature Date 4. ^3, Applicant must havy^all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commissio(n Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. /i?'*■ •. ^j2go,ow» o o» r- ^ > c o V) o 9 n uim m 03 w 5|5cp T X o O > Mm Q > a o» Ui (/> 3 -< o IIn H ^ H » fs> 2^ > o m M mm 1v<4' Ooro |v. ors m ymM ■ • • r. , -< in ?9 s >pm •< ^„ in w H fn in *§111? > in d w n ;2g -< S m g IH > ^ d ^ r* o < o Ci M X .* ' V. g > > o -M ■• ft ?4^'*S M r* r" o fs»•< in "n H O a in > X tSc.c.^M S N d d $ S !> 2 » < * in ^ 9 ^u, d m m > <» w r- _ > vo < m d MO H r- o ► < o r- o o [r> o S ^ S m m in w iggd ? X o O O Mnl Q > r- dH 3 -C o I m. in 5 O ISJ d “O H O m |S IN> \M M m ;d P- o ^2 m d o ?2S5§S ^ > c d (/) o d o p m m in 04 555c ? ? O O O Mm Q > r- d in d 3 -< o I H TJ H M o o IN> m is d d »o 2 > m > o » o ;d 9s* m TJ o-o > o o ;o 55-< in 5- O H r* > o C. C O U4 o o o d in \M H vn ”8U4 so rn M d O m m H H d d m m 50 3J I M O M r- d o I rs> VH is i O O o H s do in o #1'7 e^'v’ «!» .. i . ■ ■ ■■ ■ ^ A- fs> O o o > > S3 H >5 f O o >o Min w d > ^ — in d w r* < M O m m o > > o O m m X X d C-)i U4 in I M M d I ro KM 4^ M r- o S§m in H m X o 6 S S m m o ^d r* d tM d o o o KM in I M M d trv> o fs> |S5“ d o o o m M X o Xo s • •% d > H Oz if O o o > O rs>oN rs> |5 ' X M d KM •*. ^ Vjt ■ ' > ■ ■.■*•"» ^ ,. ?*'.'•■ . ■ '■ * „ ■ ' ■ '■bl+ .--..'V <• . ■>• © ■ ■ «*• >. - @ - # ■ © -i. . ,. ■'i ?S^//f-P3- -m-mrt .'t'^ i ;•: I ‘V j.-ir* ......LSfi , r , ■ •• • : .• ,,*‘; ^ m . r» ^ t - ’Ti^ ^ 1; .. : ' "t *’ * if: ; "'■* *.l- ^ ......................... ' " f <il;::__ / /'*, Su-^ *■'*■• j/j». .' ,tt,d.’^ V . •■->4 '<'.■ >j -- I £>y(rtr : 5*//*/7 /•jci ' r <*.€>/: ^AC. A^t € i ^ / .. • , j-».- .• V .. ■ .4.^ . *« 1 :» • ' . * . ■ I ..»• . /• • > V.. . • 1 * * ♦ . 4 ' .V-sC- - i • •I ^ , V :vt . w',' .:- ‘ t. Nr. , . *.4, ^Vi ^ ** • . . • •*.^ ^ ■. «S|/’ * >v - •." .. . *•-• .•■*»* • • • • t I /* 'T ■'/■ Hr’*>. V ' *> ■ ■ ' v* .* •f. • • ' t S > . 'f 4 L * i • . '4 i f^K.rrf ' *’•■■•, ,.v4.^;jJ V-' •'. • #4 -> V.'.: • r ■• ■■ ’. ru » j * * • • *. ‘ ^ j • C*- • ^ ’* ‘. V'j¥^f • r . ^ > •, V ■V- ^c- ■ t.N'. M • i-Tc# ■ *«- , ■ wSg» 3'-^''—7# ^ ' 'I*. ••' * '••••* irV*. •.> ‘Ww•- •-# (. ** ’?-■•;"• *'• •- 'll. uL»’:-f,-.#/N;.|^» :•/ % ' «4 m ■ ' ^ k« *.' i?< ^ -f"-'!5r: ./•... . . . ^ . 1 I "j * ’■■^1 ■ ‘••. ■%. *•.*’<» 'T. r.w y v-' •j’f f • V '.i*vV^<?V;.: sl^- .- - , >-,,i I «r • fi* - v,*^ J. , ■■;*>-* ,M •.'•••: .'. . S* • ' SITE EVALUATION REFORT FOR JOAN SUEETSER ORONO, MINNESOTA V, !(■'S-Il-8/ >- 'IV » • 3 y ‘ ". *«r, > ..'J-. V.vV-'-- y.^-.W . • V ' ' * • On lUy a-11, 1987 Iw ne« loti, 2 4iul 3, woru tciU-U for Ujlh 4 pnnury «n8 an altcrnatt drainficid sitt;, and the cAiitinj house on Lot 1 ms tested for an alternate site. lot 1 had vory good soils on the alternate site with an avcragu purcol* alien rale of 3.4 minutes per inch which along with the lack of a high water table would allow a standard system should this site ever bo ncidcd. tot 2 had an average percolation rate of 7.1 minulus per inch (holiit t.4) nuuded. Iha altarnale site (tales 5-6) had an average ralo of i.S minulws per inch but also a high possible water table requiring a mound systnm. . . ^ ‘’'“'■•a* P«rcolallon rate of U-9 minutes per inch (tales UA)but with a high possible wator table would require a mound system. Thu alter nate sue had an avciage rate of 14.4 minutes per Inch (holes 5-6) but would also require a mound system because cf the possible high water table . 'I i'"* ^or the lots, a specific system design willbe heeded for each lot. If there are any other questions, please contact mo. Sincerely, FEHCOH. INC. Hark S. Gronberg PCA certified ^ ,' 4* M. ■ vn .^v - v?<r-; 1 V r * - •; . • ■ 1 ■'s ■ S’. I w*« m • , -f i T * I w V ^V4t* • - - vt; : . 4'. " ?> V5 . ♦ - a * • •’ . . ■ -'4 V ‘ •• * V U^k* ' A a [ Iv'V“' '• l .i—‘-vyeA { ,*.•••'■«*. fA# >I»'S . Ve ' ^ »>- » 4 ' *. • -Jt,;;. ••• s V a» J-. . . - i* ^ V ^ ^ ■■ 4' .i' . ir •f.- V * *# •. tv f> af^Vs .»•v' f <■/ .!«aw. ; » » • • -I- I •a *•# «''T* *' I ., *•*#. ./ f I . f U ^ I . ./ t.' \ . ;s » a - • # : * k »• ♦ i • . J. • • • V . • •1 it.’ ' « k.-- Wt.a#4 ^444'." '•' '•■ -*V • . * .. eer» I * ^ S**'^4»4| 4* ^ A • ■ S :1 3'- ............- " » < a ,V .» V . ^ . i . V’, ■ >5». »• - ,. •- ^ -m • . I * “ a *!' ;a I >.v SRtWMPP . •• w . *4 Vi SITE EVALUATION REPORT FOR JOAN SWEETSER ORONO, MINNESOTA i*4 •.^ V V S-11-8/ On M4y 8*11. 1987 two nww loU, 2 and 3. wore to&ted Tor Doth « priMry «nd An AiternAtA drAinfield site. And the existing house on Lot 1 was tested Tor an AlteroAte site. Lot t had vory good soils on the Alternate site with an average percoi* Alton rate of 3.4 alnutes per Inch which along with the lack or a high watur taOle would allow a standard system should this site ever bv needed. Lot 2 had an average percolation rate of 7.1 minutus per inch (holes t«4) but with a high possible water table a mound system would be nuuded. Iha alter' nate site (holes 5*b) had an average rale of ti.!> minutes per Inch but also a high possible water table requiring a mound system. Lot 3 had an average percolation rate or 0>9 minutes per Inch (holes 1*4) but with a high possible wator table would require a mound system. The alter* Hate site had an avciage rate of 14.4 minutes per Inch (holes S*6) but would also require a mound system because oT the possible high water table. Once the houses are proposed Tor the luis, a specific system design will be needed Tor each lot. If there are any other questions, please contact mo. Sincerely, PERCOR, INC. Mark S. Gronberg PCA certified •-f 4 ‘r-‘'. Jilt' . i.. rr* ■? . 'P- y '• • ■' .. •V, h- I- • c:' I f 'Vv - TT<.: m ^■:-5 !■'>'< ^\‘-y;-; *; W ^ ..:>V .':-:rv ^0 ■,'■ <►':.lC*-<■-rA ■n ;c*' •• -. •:• • t •. , J-. ■-. -'■'i fj';-'.- .. • ;i • • •■ • * • '■.*'' • CITYof IJ!{I oroi C I r y oROfvad 1:--! - ^ On th* North Shore of iMhe Mmnetonka Post umc« llM fM*Cr)r«yil Bay, MUiimmu aaW8*MiiiBBitOHhii0^ ’•■•.•JteV.v-•> ' *^■r.. Jttn« 21, 1990 V M vA ' tX Av • "i ^ ■ ■■ .•••“•. V,>'^'»»lrsi4'' ' »'.. • .*• ■ • A ■■ -A' : ■ .:•■ ■ :■ > V '• • *. y V^, ■ : ■ Mr. « Mrs. Allen Sw«etser 94S Old Long Lake Road Wayrata* MM 55391 ■■■■■ ^ 4 *4 ■, •irf- ' V -• • • • A'V ■ • .: .. ;. )': REt 835 Old Long I^ke Road - Septic Program Billing Dear Hr. « Mrs. Sweetsert The City of Orono la Ir receipt of your returned bill for ■ ;•• ■■ ■ •> • A J. ■ A-V.V: 'V. ■ ■: '/> * -s: -* *.1 •. i * 4 ■’• • -:" ,'•* •: ^r'.' V »'»V.^S- ' ■■A the gJ»'est''houte located on your property. It la my i"«presslon ^^ AIMS ^ ^ as S» »• w ^ •• — » ^ : your note that the structure is not currently being lived in ’ ■ f v’fe ^ nn«j the well is not functional. W*» will be pleased to remove thin building from the septic billing upon a site inspection that verifies the following: 1. All plumbing and plumbing fixtures hnvo been removed from the structure. At ', > ' ‘ ?.Septic tanks have been pt’.mpod out and filled with dirt.^ , V*4^' 'mm- I would also note that if thin build inti has a separate well that is no longer in use, ycu ar»' responsible for havinn a well cIrillBr propti*riy crout th^ well to prov*ont •i<iuif<>r oontanitnation* ? .;>v;. .-: V ‘Va;,v:' \ t m •y *r* % '.■■••<v:-..- ^.. V.Please C«m1 free ‘.c '•cntac'.; at 4?3“7.»5‘: if you wish to set up an inspection to verify that rh.' above items h.ive been completed. ‘ .W > gj S'->^ sincerely. <) . : V A. ' ,Z' Michael P. Gotfptn Assistant Planning « Zoning Administrator .. .4, m-r ^ . V- • - ' ■■ :•. - j ..... .. -I.-*' '■m ■■’* : i i -U eZ.0A i'-Z ■'*4 W'i. ■ '...Um«ei J..... H.btt.th» aulldjn. 4 Sonin. Adninlntrator ;-v^ r/ ^ Brue* Vsng, Field tnspeeter . 4 ‘ Charlotte MFO/lsv' V f ■ m .,,. ';v-. •' ^ A- *rA ;: -4* Jfp^.. < . - M. » . t.»* 1 , A STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ABANDONED HELL RECORD ■. . . (3 U lOCATtO* Of fCLL CotiAty «•»• To^sntp ««•€ MINNESOTA unique well NO. (Ita«t blank If not known) iennepin Towntntp N Long Lake ■© 117 or S lanot Ryaotr C 22 Stction Mo. 6 fractloM % % of H 4. UCLL OCPTH (coapltlto) ft.115 OaCt italtO 4/14/92 Htll LoetHon or Olsunc* fro. to*« 845 Old Long Lake Road, Wayzata, MN 55391 Rwatrtcal Strttt Addrtti and City of tntfrttction Show taact location of wtll (In tedtiofi fHd with ’i*) N Uj SktUN M9 «f «•<) locttia* S. OtUING WTMOO (tf knoiM) IQ C«b1# tool 40Uv#rfo TQOrtvtii IcQ 0«9 ;Q Hollow Hod SQAlr b Q Sor*d llQ------- iQUotiry (Q Jolttd Cl 1 0 a •1 1 9 •a a * • «« 4» • ••.• ••a a • m • • •B « « 0 a 4 I 0 •* •• ••aw 1 0 •• I -kU 6. OBSTRUCTIOMS Vtll obatniclfd Q Toi Ro Obitniclicni rwowtd Q Yts □ R® If Obstnictlons cannot bf rt«0«fd. contact KOH be^orf leal(np. 2. PR0P£»n 0«ICR*S HA«£ Joan Sweetser Mailing Addrtii if difftrtne man proptfty addrtfi indicattd aoevt HARONCSS or 3, rORMATlON t06 COLOR FORMATlOli If not kno%m, inoicatt foriMtion log fro« nt- wpll or ntarpy wtll. •’‘sH ut -'S i . atWRtS. tUVOllON. sounck'of CAT* - CASIHtS «EW»tO. CASIKSS mfOAATW. ETC I Im mmm fe. 1.2 * . v^’'- . ■'{ 0 •• ^nCUl AiAMDOKlO VUl tfC0«0 (May bt w»tO for rroptrly Tra«»far) 7. use l^Oo-fftic C3 «o«<tor(ng BQ :□ Irrigation SQ FubllC O 3Q Tfst Util 60 Hunic'loal IcQ Coointrcial TQ Air Conditioning UQ , ___ a. CASINC(S) iQ Black 4Q Thnadfd O rj^alv. SQWoIdtd iQ Flattie {QStainlttt Stftl 2 115la. to In. to /t. ft. 9. SCRCCR )QJ Scrotnod wall fro* n Open Wolf ft. W ft. to ft. ft. (If known) 10. STATIC WATER UVCL 63 ft. f^oolow □ »0OY« / /I / /QO land lurfact Cata htisurfd 4/ U. weiLHCAO CCmplCTICM iQ Fitleti Adaptor 2Q Basoi«tnt offltt SS3-*" Found Burlod G------------- 12. CA0UTIN6 iNFOAMTIOH JjJJ) N««t Ct<MOt 20 »«"toi*ltt Q Grout •atonal Portland froM 0_toll5ft. cu. ydi^ 13. MEAfltST SOURCES OF CON TAM I RAT IQJI 2Q ftti south diroction sewer typt Util dlslnftcttd bofort toiltng? X3 14. FW# □ R o«>h #4 Rdt Froatnt Typo: O Subiwrflblt Q ^-5- C «tc1procatlng Jot QCantrlfugal fiQ ----------------------------------- IS. EXISTING WELLS (Fltaio laotcn locatloni of iPandontd ano •ctivo wolli In roourks faction or on back.) Omor «miitd waU(i) on proparty? jJJ&at □ "• Abandoaod: □ Famanoat □ Tawrary )Qj Rot kaaltd 17. WATER WELL CORTRAaORS CERTIFICATICR Thii wall wai taalad wndar ay Jurisdiction and tMf raport n trua to ma boat of wf knowladga and ballaf. Bergerson-"Casvell t Inc> >27058 Liconsoa luitnais RAO* LicoMa Mo. Addrotf >ins Industrial btree^------- ............. M«wa of Ori11 or V T • : c- -t ' s. To aiP Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A, Mabusth/ Building & Zoning Administrator May 13, 1992 #1734 John and Mary Jane Burger, 3750 Bayside Road Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing Zoning Districts - LR-lA and RR-IA Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.27, Lot Width Required Proposed Variance Subdivision 5 (B). Variance required for Lot 1 - 300' 210' 90' "i f'-:. Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (B), "Combination of separated parcels prohibited. No lot or parcel of land which is divided by a public, private or platted road or road easement which results in any segment thereof being less than the minimum acreage required for that zoning district, shall be allowed to be combined with any separated parcel of land across the road for purposes of qualifying under the minimum acreage, open space, required yard, s<*tback or sanitary or septic system requirements, nor shall building or density credits be credited or transferred between such parcels under any provisions of this chapter. Each separate parcel must individually conform to the provisions of this chapter in connection with construction of improvements thereon." 1% 'fh t Applicants propose combining or connecting Lot 1 and Outlot A as a single residential unit located in a RR-IA, 5 acre minimum zone. Variance to this section shall be required. Lot 1 « 2 acres dry contiguous Outlot A = 4.26 acres Total area « 6.26 acres dry and .33 acres wet Section 11.03. Definition 24. Lot area minimum in rural zones not served by sanitary sewer. Each lot must contain a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land exclusive of wetlands, public and private rights-of-way, vehicular or pedestrian easements. mi Proposed Lot 1 consists of 2 acres of dry buildable land. Applicants' consultant confirms suitable areas for both principal and alternate on-site septic systems. Outlot A is proposed as merely area credit for 5 acres zoning requirements. Chapter 11 - Class III Subdivision. ■. r - I '. - wrv. vfir^V ^ ^ - rv-'^ k- Zoning Memo #1734 May 13, 1992 Page 2 c ■ List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Sketch Plan E - Planning Commission Minutes 9/16/91 P G H I J K L M b : -iAt N O Staff Letter to Barrett Ordinance #601, Subdivision 2 Barrett Letter 5/12/92 Plan of Access to Lot 1 Weckman Memo/SP Testing Report Septic Location Sketch Lot 2 Septic Map Lot 1 Ordinance #33, 2nd Series, Definition of LR-IA and I.li Zoning Boundaries Zoning Boundary Map Preliminary Plat /■ •*: -:.A Review of Subdivision Application The applicants propose a two lot subdivision. The most northern parcel. Lots 1 and Outlet A, located within the RR-lA zoning district and Lot 2 located within the LR-IA zoning district. Review Exhibits M and N, the actual zoning boundary line is located further north than the line shown on preliminary plat. Actual zoning boundary line is approximately 30' south of proposed division line. Applicants no longer propose the division of their homestead portion of the property as in the sketch plan review. Mr. Burger asks that Outlot A be set aside as an area credit for Lot 1 on the south side of trail. As already noted in the sketch plan review, Mr. Burger has attempted to achieve access for proposed Outlot A via easements from private adjacent property owners, the City of Orono and the DNR. He has been unsuccessful in each attempt. During the sketch plan review, the Planning Commission conceptually approved the applicants' proposal to set aside Outlot A as an area credit for Lot 1 requiring a special lot combination being filed against chain of title of both parcels. The special lot combination will insure that upon a future sale, they will be sold as one unit and that Outlot A may never be sold off for development as a separate residential unit. Access was a major concern because the Planning Commission wanted to deter any further encroachment of the wetland that divided the northern parcel from the southern parcel. Applicants have achieved access via the Bayside Landing properties. Outlot B to the south side of County Road 84 completes the Burger's land holdings. Outlot B has provided riparian access to the Burger property for many years. A 66' right-of-way takes up most of the area of Outlot B. Applicants' surveyor has shown the 929.4 elevation. The mim i 1 '•*«3 ; ' Zoning Pile #1734 May 13, 1992 Page 3 limited dry land area is located predominately in the west portion of Outlot B. County Road 84 is classified as a Scenic Parking in the CMP and is approved at maximum width of 50' to 66'. The Hennepin DOT has been asked to review the plat. Staff will report on their concerns at your meeting. Lot Configuration As in the sketch plan review, applicants propose a lot width variance for proposed Lot 1 shown at a 210' width where a 300' width is required. Planning Commission members conceptually approved the width variance along with the buildability of the lot by seeking area credit of Outlot A. Lot 2 satisfies all LR-IA zoning standards. Lot 2 ... Required Proposed 2 acres dry Total 4.51 acres 2.9 ares dry Access Access for Lot 2 shall remain as is via County Road 84. Access to Lot 1, Review Exhibit I, shall be via Landmark Drive under the authorization of the public underlying easements granted to the City at the time of the Bayside Landing platting and, finally, via a private access easement granted in favor of proposed Lot 1 over Let 1, Block 2, Bayside Landing. The City Attorney has been asked for his written opinion concerning the issue of legal access to lots outside of original Bayside Landing properties via the public easements granted to the City over Landmark Drive. Review Exhibits G and H. Barrett has provided a written opinion reaffirming the directives and intent of Ordinance 6.01, Subdivision 2 and other applicable law. Staff has been in contact with the attorney for Mr. Burger and he confirms that Burger has met with the authorized representative of the homeowner's association. Burger has agreed to a share in the original cost of the road and in the execution of an agreement confirming future owner of Lot I's share in the cost of maintenance and upkeep of Landmark Drive. As of this writing, staff has received no written confirmation of these agreements but it appears that Burger has solved the issue of access via Landmark Drive and the Bayside Landing properties. Staff will ask applicants' attorney to comment further at our meeting. Septic Review Review Exhibits J, K, and L. Weekman confirms in his memo of May 6, 1992 that Lot 1 has been found to have adequate, suitable soils for principal and alternate on-site septic systems that meet all required setbacks. Staff did not require additional septic testing for Lot 2 as this property will receive sewer if ordered for the area. Weekman also advised that staff had done a review of all properties within the i ■* ■• TKuy.'^ '' ; .■ ■ ■ .’■ •; ;■ Zoning File #1734 May 13, 1992 Page 4 proposed Stubbs Bay sewer district and that this site was found to have adequate area for an alternate septic site. Outlets A and B As already noted above, the City shall require a special lot combination for Outlot A with Lot 1 and will also require a special lot combination for Outlot B with Lot 2. Outlot B shall be limited to providing riparian access or use for solely Lot 2. Because of the limited land area, the property should be limited to one dock and no permanent or temporary parking of vehicles allowed because of the limited land base. W Staff will also recommend thac the special lot combination for Outlot A prohibits all residential construction. This is based on the findings that emergency vehicles could not achieve immediate access to the property. staff Reconmeiidation To approve the preliminary subdivision application of John Burger for the property located at 3750 BaysidCi Road, finding that all standards of the LR-IA zoning district and on-site septic code have been satisfied and grants a variance to Section 10.27, Subdivision 5 (B) granting a width variance for proposed Lot 1 based on the following findings; 1. 2. There is no available dry buildable area adjacent to Lot 1, The property was originally platted in the current configuration in 1977 when the RR-IA zoning standards were in effect. Applicant has demonstrated that a residence can be installed meeting all other standards of the RR-IA zoning district. A variance to Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (B) that would allow the area credit of Outlot A with 4.26 acre dry buildable parcel divided from proposed Lot 1 by the Luce Line based on the following findings; -m a) iifc Outlot A is land locked and cannot achieve legal access. b) Outlot A as an independent unit does not meet the required area standard of RR-IA zone. ■ ,■ . •■.* ‘ ... ■ ■' y.' - v^ff -i*'.r Zoning Pile #1734 May 13, 1992 Page 5 ;:^- ' V.' ::m.'■'i .# All reFidential improvements shall be allowed only on the contiguous 2 acre dry buildable area of proposed Lot 1. The approval of this two lot subdivision shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. iMi Applicants to provide written confirmation that Lot 1 will share in the cost of maintenance and upkeep of Landmark Drive. 2. Applicants to provide copy of access easement granted in favor of Lot 1 over Lot 1, Block 2, Bayside Landing. : v.;.4 Applicants to execute special lot combination recognizing the relationship of Outlet A with proposed Lot 1 that they are to be considered as one residential unit and sold as one. No residential accessory structures shall be allowed to be built on Out lot A. Applicants to execute special lot combination recognizing Outlet B and Lot 2 as one unit. The agreement shall reflect Outlet B provides riparian use and access exclusively for Lot 2 and that there shall be no parking either temporary or permanent of vehicles on this limited site and that Outlet B shall be limited to one residential dock. Drainage and utility easements along the perimeters of all property lines and 5' along the shared lot line and can be omitted wherever there are designated wetlands. Appl, -ants must provide proof that the flowage and conser'v ttion easement was filed over the designated wetland area at :ne time of the platting of the Burger property in 1977. l£ 1,’•is was not completed, the City will ask Mr. Burger to execute a new flowage and conversation easement over the wetland area. 7.Payment of $50.00 for septic review per fee schedule to complete filing of preliminary subdivision. rttii —-------- '--A if.' » '‘ v Si 7^ it^firi'ii^ itnhiiht Lr^ I t U’» U-MU'lTt-* 1350200000 '^rrr-. •:c CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPSRTY LOCATION Site Address 3-7i^n goAr> Dtu^hJo Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 2/ i>ooZ a *jo os-ni'-^ ooifS Please check one - Property >< abstract or _ _ torrens? Attach legal description to application. WTZ34 ' z2 QAxjy/y/avx/ kEC2IPr-iHM YOU ii240250 coot POl 70S:- 04/24/' APPLICANT Name J pwki Ajsjo danig ^jAC a ‘g/>AC>_________ City: Cxjptin__________Zip: Phone (home) Tin*,, ____ Phone (work) ujt>< Address s..32SC2_J£^fe^'m OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Kijh. _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone (work) kpetim^:^ Address: (attach list if more than one) City:Zips— B3CCSTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Sise • n ■WPresent Use (check) Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels 4-. Residential; no. of units A other (specify) L^siD '7: Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites •■i Number of Building Sites: I Existing Units New Units Total Units _ i Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: /Units per Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check)X Residential Other (specify) I t'ii ' *'V ■ iF 2. HINIlfCDI MAT!!RIAL HECESSARY FOR COMPLSfe PRELIMIHARY APPLICATION Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 3.■ 4. ertification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete . Zoning Official's Signature_ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III)$200.00 Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement 4 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) 300.00 300.00 •f * Preliminary Review (Class III s all non-residential) 325.00 + 25.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 175.00 Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application 150.00 r'-Renewal of Final Subdivision Application 100.00 The applicant hereby agrees to provide ail information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature • V.tt' ' Owner's Signature Date Date Applicant must have all /ii^mittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Ccmunission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend In your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this charge prior to the meeting. m Sic: L..M I'-..» - *. ^ ■ . /.»•• ■rtf^;--'-*'***-.. ■ w, ^ i»^' T ‘ -, ^' t \ •' ’■ -1«•!t^-- & ^• ,.* J. ,*v--'- - H O -O =2 > S 2> X z o ac "0 m m M o -0 2 > s: » > X z o qi > ;o ^ -o m -%p V - -'■ :%i 5 II ? 2 *• ^‘..v .‘^ ^ , - '* • . ‘ '4 ■ ?' • •“•22 ?' "2“^*<St5 siis: . SIS ma* «r«M nv in o X 2 < :*• 01 *S*lr.i MO o iv> m M O Z 04z > > Sir-SSSS ^ 2 ^ S o ^ Ufg ^ .< f ‘"'t- ^ r* ut c c.« ‘""'’IP' S o 30 o S o m _ o 09 3 0» O f O _ > W ^ < 5 Mm O) M g M *:;r i :■ ■;'^.!> m m X 3 m CA . ?5S*-§S< o u> X o 3 U1 -4 04Q M m o o £ X z < 01 -4 M *S3 0> «• OSc X o I MO X Mm M o m oi X > </>in z m o> fv> ^ m 3 S< o» ^•r^^' ,1;f:^X , X:'- ■f w ■X»,fv .»>■» r* OI c t- «> w — ■ ^ t> o O C» C«l n *0 n m o g 0> 3 CI» e > iS^c§rl> X O M 0) O *< M M O 09 O «< 04 HO O 0» O > X o -n in r- n I 9 O ^ S X O I !► "« 04z m o» m M 09 3 09 IN» M OI ..v-' .. . ■«^ ^ ■' -‘ .-•• . .. . ■■■>■ ■■■ ^- ■■•- ' .'.HK« '*•■ • .' > ^ ■•* ■ • ,V<. ■:-JjMB ■ • y-^> . «p« A--. ■‘\ • ; ' ■ fl ■ a ' '^‘ ' ■’ * •• T. it-'-,f .'V H O.X 3 X m X m > X \ > > ni Z o a X > o a 3 X X m -I o X z > c X> X z o 3 X ni X m > X \ -< > > m Z O §*5S X m r" M f- r- o w Q -H m o o» 3 in m o M o Mr- n X in o r- ► ► in > 3 9 X • X 3 X Mm 3 c m r* M> c z > ^ S S M 9 g ro m 3 04 9 c. > X 3 X M in 3 X fg in X04 ? X o o in X > X o O' XX Mm X M, *5 09 0) O 04 r- H H o 0» c > > O ?9 H -4 04 m m m 09 o in f- O o «M X X M Z > M fTI 3 3 O ^ M M O I H Z Z X rv> X z z m 04 .* ■ —• > X 9 o > m O C -4 O X P H ^ m <90 09 09 in 09 X f I cSzjjM 3 09 M OX o z o •3 3 m X O X m 04 r* M X 9 o 04 Q 9 M m O 9 z in o H M 3 X H 9f > -< in o f- > X ^ in > Z O X • X 0 M Mm 3 X r r- M > m 3> X m a > •H . X H X fV> X > X IN> ,:v X ^ C9 C9 O 04 > O > > O 9 < X X 9 M 09 < < ^ >3 ^90 -4 M Z 3 in ► < •ZOO M S X < o C M M O I m o n X iN> X X m 04 in M M 09 in m m 091\> rv> r* in c CD o 04 0 9p in M > Z OX O r- X X IV -4 O X Z > 2: X > X z o 3 X m X m > X _ > m z S -4 a X 2 > c 2X 2 o g*5S >____3 X m X m > X \ -< > > m z g2 * 5 So z X X m 3 04 O O o M > O > 01 9X 01 < X 9 r* O M 04 m o w o p m f in X M 9 09 I r- r* m M> m 09 m M M m z 9 M Z Z nt r- IX 09 m rvj 3 09 O m 04 2 H X I- zm m M 09 M r- H in M 09 o in r- m 0 04 09 M mm 04 vO 09 '•<. *'"5551C9 O____ _____o o r* 9 9 9 Iff M m m > ^ 3 C9 X X m M o# X -4 a O 9 m M in r- in X _ 04 00 in oorv ■•1.' = !d%%SS .. iivno o r* 9 9 9 in > > C C 4 X < X X Mm 09 O O 9 M M m m > -V 3 a X X •< » 5!d555S 2 9 M IS| ^ O o m m 9 r- r- o o f- 9 in > > > > • X<33^>-m 09 9 O 9 M M m m > 3 o X X is*- fX i rf* •f*ry f- 01 c. ® SSO > 04 9 5 ® i ®00m o 09 3 e o > in > > 9 C • X < v5 M m 09 9 9 M M 9 > 9 M OI X 3 m o O m fv> in m 3 _ M in 9 X01 3 C O o in > 09 o - 5 S in o €9 in 3 C9 ISr-3X_M fi 2 2 2 z o 0 r- I C > m m IV 3 M r- o m Oi X r* m z Z in p M o X' r- o X M 04 > rtf m IV/-ss ' V"?' ■-V . =» ’’ 77/» - * -• > 'V,' ^ » X *■, "1 • .,r*. i' •». • • V' i. '«*' > ' ■.*^; •- • *■ V d Vt;.,.<j \ n--. - ni T-l ..'^v* ^ 'T-J- — ^*4* J- .- ^ m.'* 1. ^iL. $.- ^ ^ ^ ♦ * *.. . - • >*V • >1— - ■ m ^4 ^ --•‘' •f.•.«. m^ • i . , ^ ^ ^ ^ ^** • -•• ^ « /; ; .<#7-;^,;. -^ . .**.-/, . ■.•, , 'v- ■ !^ . /. v- r‘*' .; * V'^-•' V* ‘ •*';'' *■' .*’ - V- . I ■ A*c*-*f^ .'!‘tV* v7/:V-4'*^;>v4 i . Vf >:-^^ \ •• .S '•* J ,C. ’••r • K/.*- ^ * •• '• V‘*-V5s^-^f :. ■■ ‘ ' ■ ‘ V ■ ‘ ' ‘ ■ ________•■•'’' • ^ 2 • •' “ '-lo-lf H O -V X____•D m -o > JO m X o 9 -H O -«2: > £ 2> X X oX nj m i» m > XI ^ S> m X ao X > a o XXX - m '■cVV-^‘V aswp '» 4^0 A'i ' •, . j T. V . •» ' ‘V^‘- *' XuionoM ► > W OP|2 2 -H <H X V' • <*.' « » *- •-». H ■ , •• V- >' . • . .• I • ■ . .• ' ^u. Vf Ci fV» ___M ►«« I H» 5* m rsp n n X Mii ui ifi- w ^ in Xo SSE|Ui M ::.,J »•■ \ V .V W - ■ •V.. .•*-■ 1^ X ^ . ■ ■ • • « . . .. i ■-W-,-..:. X X O 01 . m m m OP ^00^ r- inm _ f r- w ui X rv’X > o Xr* -4 c c M> m H H X M M X -4 H > X 2 -H m m -H I O X X m rv> X X *n -n X w*2ss? X r- fo o o•" »s O M fS» i» ino«in lat oi r* 0) o ui> > m gi 0 X X X ^r“ in X o ^ m «< > in VI X fs> -4 Mm n X X M M X p m > ii 55 “ » O M VI ^ xn v»V > M H O S5^5SN.m p o ^ u. c/» H l>^PPM Ommo M in p in V4 o O P • Z P X IN)O m m V4 X in H in fv> is in in p M i p •V X P c C o P ^ <s > > P ^X P X X f- p m m p fti p p p p X r\*X > X X • r- H _ H» > m p p X M ^ * HI m M . X P p p ^ ^ V!p * H i P ss H O X. Z > X X > X z o X X W X m . V. <m z5 Clo X ^ ^ P XX X m p p P o ^ H m p -4 < pm n P o I- p P p O I fnpx__- M o p oP M M P I m ^ z X Xm m p p p p p p p P M isp o p p M P P O P O P • X M H O P M > -4 > PP a < H P ^• z m P p 40 > o P o o X r" Im > M p O z > M H X X P P H O P I o n z a X rv> m o O X m p m z X P OP H P M M < H > P H P M Si r- p o O o mz ^ X X o P > H o X z > X X ? X z o X X m X m ► X -< > > m z p o X > P P XX X m r- I r- p P P o pH OPH m X o ^ m n S o f p p> > p p IX -< > > Mm p X X > M M p o p H p p p p p r* p p p o p 0^-4 P P z m p 'H 8 o < ^ ^_ m O o o r- P _ ^ p> > p o X < ► > Mm P X X o M M O P > -^4 Z P M M >00 • X < > ► H*m p X X > M M p o p H J P M M P • p p p p p m z z X M m m m p X X X P p p^ is P O im -f o X z > X X> X z o Z X m X m > XV -c > > m Z P P X ► P P Z X X m ?SSis» |xo»iSlo 5S0 m p > M m p P p z r- p P M c a M H 1- P M Stz 0 P z 05 M p 0 p s p 0 P M I >• I p % ... • • *■ •. P #* » *■ r ■ • ' • Z p O o“iiS p o r- p p p p 5 5 X X Mm P o o > H M m m 0 ^ z P X X P IS m X Mm m p X HP O PM p > fp p p p < . »> -'V.t issss. X H S S Mm p o o ► MM m m o H Z P X X P I2 m X Mm m p . -> ;i p p p p p - j 5 i IPm • ■ •; . C/- X M IM O•J ■r- '*• • X' mm^- . J:'-i-0'-0X-, o. :;0 -O S ,v3 ;.,/J S5 ^ . rl .'. .* • '• >ici. ' ii*-. “■^i?“.'- . - •- •' / 1-^-* ■ . .* . - 4*.-* ^ >* . ilfe_/ * '* «*’ • * . * ’ .' ^ A*^ > ^ C: '.?■,- ;-v..‘, !-a .’K‘:v^*->.•^- i:.‘.‘^. - ■,':^^:;s^.Fr^a■"i:^ . - .-.c-.'•■.**>•’<“x- ■' ----- ■•■ ^i .,:--;;ty>:-rv.*'. .•. : ■ ; rifr'-.-;v.:;.i yy-\-■ /• - •' - v.: , .: - ,:. ■ ^ ■ f ',*v- .'.V.-.U* •> -.: ;v \'-... ■ :>*. '.-’r : '• ‘ ••' V * ‘i. ^ . ^ •• /. ' • \r'\ nz oo O ?m N. V%o M :/v 4 . • • . - ^ .Vi- ^: ‘ - • ^ —V' ^ ^ ’•*.'* . -t. ^ ^ * *. * • ■■’■’-;•' •*■ '..• ■.'•■'•. ■”*. ■* ''■>v'- . *• r *. ■ Ji •- />- •*■... •.*>►'■•;•.:?'-• //.v', . . ^*V/‘ ■'•- ■••* - 'V... •i*.y ' *,.... •*■ - V * .’ • . •;■. ^ .:^-' -4(4 • . . •^ .’a f ^ • • • t‘**V ir-V -1•T. ’.i ' ”* • • ’ k- ‘ >*» '' • •'• ■ * * V ; ;»• v< .. »•' . • •; , . ^ ■ 4. myr^vvvm -•Aiisr V- - ••• •• • ■•*- • f'‘' ' ', • .,' • fc ■ V . ' ' ■ • • •" • - . »> '-•IvV-; ' . '• ^^.. ,* •* *■ •■ • "■ -^ • ■ i%' •• v» •V ;. -» - :«. ■ .V ■ •% •* • •-.. i ................... y-afi^AW-r ■■•-•' " 'f. .. ‘‘V ..'■■■ ••' ■ O O Z M-ti ‘Ti m • "V nz -4 30 m •< z m » _ m </> H3^ m M 'A’' ;t_- :.,, -:4':\ ]^ * • r 1 . • MM ill ills:si » '4 j* -<*: • .- .V ■•V'' ‘ % . * V- mmr -m-mr *yy m-} CD -4 -n _ ni < o O mm'y- yyyyM ■ •'V • •, l\ 4* l.:-M •• » i * . i . y ■ ■ •-‘.jii’'-’;■v.; :-. -r. - * • ■ ., • r-:i y-‘ y-^'- ■ ->. .••*;*->• • •■‘V-i. - . , - : •■ * .'‘i-V,.-: .«y<" . ..,. ------- :y ‘ •' A"-V » ••. -1'M. * -. ■ :t\ ';. ^ it' ./to '. ■■'’V'- AV-tt ■ •,‘Ci ... •. * ‘r ■^r. :..-■ .V ■,i • >• .f i;s•n • M-.' ' T-' 1 . , V • '•*-. ‘ - » ^ ■* . • 4 > ■? *•* ti’ '• .. . i. ,; . » *_A. r V • • ■».* I ♦ •• ’Av ^ • * ' • ■• . . . .<. X •O M M ^ M Of S K ; -V— '‘ ‘ ' * ■ ~ ■ • - t '»■ A - \ V . ., X- ■ • ' • » -..». -* r "'■;:.»> ’•■ ■■ BCV .> •'•■•' ••.' r-| • ,•..■■•.«*>' 4, <* , .. 4 4,^ ; k r y.--V f . .'t".' - _______1I_ r; ■' 1(n / »If»t h T^) • > '^ •• 0 i ■'■ ‘ •■■ . i''-' !?!?.*'>■ ^ '.•:i' „•■■.,• lltw /. ■«»» •. . rV*. ' I .-, •'. V'V •*« ;*^ .■ ' fl," ’ t' ■• " '■.' *• -, ■. - lun WM'irt (II) (It) (N) « (S) • j »>-— m.m----- P 5^- 2; (II) •n ri (15) ^ » — I (5) ! '■, v.l ■ * II £-4III) ini (#4) ^ Ty r-y »y l?5) ,______ 1 iPi ML3L ••rirt J3UL «» *• 4 f >t) tl C »4> »»4 1^ 9 « t* \ K“' 1 «ii»r >U:n t L ^ t t ■ . lYL t#» .n=. • IMt iflirr-Ti (II) JML l»«5) ♦ •P • J »t • / • thf.lT 4 .'' it t • f {}^ foaioi ■'A^r '111 T'.: • kv. ^'v.v^-r-r- %->:■ J'-V • SlAf'.- V • ■ 1 h' F'‘ 5^ ^ .J 1.’^ v :^ ■. .■ -' *■ ■'* *>'f •- ‘ V . *■ 'i ‘\- ‘ • viVi:'.';.; •*► • * ■ ■ '•<•4 ^ ' • .. • •:^*i ’ ^ K.te k-,-,.,fe ‘ b »»•' i •b •-> V ■^%yr^ iv, IV. >\ * . i\ vaa «ov«o oy scnroaaor. soconaad by Hoo&v ■to'^f'ai:^ approval of • appMcatton pioa*. Eotaar-j r. Bair«r, fer*''prapgi tocatod at 3050 farvlaw Lana, /or nardcovor ana satbacktva^tani to raconatruct dock aroa anti 3*.alr-ay. Ayog 5, raya 0* •■* .‘* <^^ (il3) tl88S JOHN eUNGEN 3750 BAYSIDE ROAO SKETCH PLAN REVIEW • 7: ’ Jonn Burgtr ana Dar Jonn-on of num«i»T »»n.i*ty worp "''firasj for this application. v:*>r\;L<tj Habusth axplalnoa that Mr. flurgor propcsoa ’thraa^,‘Tl subdivision. Lots A and B ara kUMo tho LR-lA. 2 acra vionf district and Lots C plus c: arc vitnin »no mr-ia, 5 acrp ^^ont' district. Lot C Is located on tha north 3Ida of tha'l.ucd'^i^'ip' Lot Cl Is proposad as tha building site, using Lot C-for^^rBif to fleet the 3 acre roquironant. Lot Cl Is 2 .acres-*, ahtfif^^a^ the 3 acre contiguous standard for rural lots. Mr, Qur9erfWoii^< execute a aiedat lot comninatlon to combine bnth 1otsJ«..LoE;v4!^ the north side eoulo never l*e built upon. within several years. Hr. Burger has triad tu gain acceos.«.;;t^j^li ;V, f.' Mr. Burger has triad northern lot, but to no avail. Lot Cl el 11 nead s wtdtn^* as tho lot only neasuroo 210*. She went on to explain tnat the subdivision as‘'progiit presented as if it ware a sewered property. Hr. . B«ip| saeking credit or the wetland area. She asked the Cowfllfi they would consider the subdivision based on density credit a sawnred property, and condition the pralimnary tuBdl approval subject to availability of sewer In the futures noted that this property has always boon Included In tno-'pi sewored district. asked '*kn '-Y- I l-^s^r'74r • s.* :• -*■ i Rowlette ■oratorluffl. If this property Is i ■■ •-■*•/<■ 's'l.UrIncluded -'<1( 0 - fl , * •* ?* AnrA/irt fhA 1 p K.s r»r> nA**%iini% a# tssmA AA«e# mmmK»ti »yr IV,*’i- •1 eAeI»l • he« I H «• N V **M»r*^ A „ '•*, ' *7 • **•;•••. -1 •lelel*l*l - ■ v' :-- liBAMeai^wxii f, *iw-4kt L. . a» J^«.vaw - • i, fV' -.7': i r • ■• ti '^' • **' * ‘ ' ■/r* m ^..-.u^ Lot 'C .approvod prior to final plat approval, and Li building piv/aiopa with no accass avaflabla to Lot C.' :« 5/,^ / ' • *. •» y*’ ! .•1 k •w \(iX u' I s i ( i '\ • «w , «r. H •/*> .'*1''* •• “• ^ k ••>! jrf # * ^ <a '-‘Dan Johnson fait that It would ot tha futura ownart Ct ond C*8 raaponsibt llty to datormine prior to purchasi^.^'^^i abllltlos to gain accoso ovor the Luco Lino. . .-; .V..T'>' .- V- • >• * Conor, had a p.-obion approving tno uao of Lot for Lot Cl as you could navor uso that portion of anything. Johnson askod .ibout ro::3nlnq lot Cl. proport/^l^ # #■ • Mabusth noted that thoy originally did not portion bocauso thoy did not vant to croata higror this area. Schroodor suggostod that Lot Cl bo roronod to 2 acr.tr!f0rt\ with tho provision that Lot C bo givon to tho park. C has vory little valuo to anyone buying tno property. roaont ,y ■■ *'■.-* •**. i.* H« • fbit-vtoy, Burger noted that tho marKot valuo on that piece Is •Sl®**®Dt!|r' and ho pays about S800 per year in taxes. Mo noted that,(:hj|" originally bought tho property with tho Intont of a PUD, how'i'v4r^E^«5 that never nator 1 a 11 cod. Ho also naa thought Lot C may fco .^ for tha soptic systom for Lot Cl If the OMH would P**dht;,.::«’;?4i^3J?t^^ toraporary building oasonont ovor t.no Luco Lin®. Burger that ho could dodlcato Lot C for park uso. but ho would rathar^'flOi^MSSSi sorothing olso. . ,, Maoustn nolod thjt tho accoc*; o.irio’non*: fron t^o Bciysido ' ending would bo tf'irough tho ho:rioown«rs prtv^tii j ulinincito tha nood for o drlv^ across th« Vdt1^A<td£iihfch wc« Cohen notod that ho would fr* ^not apprnvo cc.-.lingont upon the availability of sewar- ■•■■■■^■:^ ya- - -. .* • • « ** .v-^: Burger noted that If he cannot go ahead and piirChaW access caseaent which Is now available to hla, h* would biv build a drive across the wetland In rather not do that. ■ • • • •.• * Johnson for Lot C. a tho future, felt that density credit should be given to^f a> > ‘V * V.'' . • ■• '• .. ,a 1--4 Mabusth asked variance for Lot Cl If the Coamlsslon would If approved. approva r;i ■ tV' ■ :• .'i 1 • \Cohen noted that ho would grant such a verlance, noted that two neriDers of the Commission were absent* , i • v-k'» »*ra>* . .. 1 • - - •. .".i' ' .. .% • *• « ®» Ik* ^ * - • jtJ .. \l/«> ' ' ^ ’*» * • •* Vy'-y / Sc CITYof OBONO . '*■? . , v^ H ‘ > iX. Munidpal Offices Port Office Box 66 CrTrtal Bay, Minnesota S5323-< May 1, 1992 1 • Tom Barrett Popham, Haik & Associates 3300 Piper Jaffray Tower 222 Ninth Street South Minneapolis, MN 55402 r;::;REi Application #1734 - John and burger 3750 Bayside Road - Preliminary Subdivxsion Application Dear Tom: ■ i .■ ■ During the preliminary discussions with the the oroDosed two-lot subdivision, the issue of access to the proplrty^ was of great concern because of the that divided the southern portion of the P^°P®^^^ created oarcel to the north. Staff reconraiended that rather achfevinTaccess via a long and lengthy * designated wetland that applicant achieve access via the ^ subdivision to the inm,ediate west. ordinance amendment that would allow /to all underlying public easements to not only provi lot./ hoLs Jithin the subdivision but the adjacent properties to achieve reasonable access via the public easement. Please pT/vatf drlfe^ ?"°ugh Srt?o\’c"an“t"l B\ock 2, B^ayside Landing. Staff has been sfiT7n f-hAt: the cuTrent owner of Lot 1 will 9^r appropriate private access ®?P^^Landmark Drivethit the CitC Attorney reaffirm in writing that Landmark uri can be used as access to proposed Lot 1. Please contact my office if you °®®'J tiol°^thti'r May than May 13th. Sincerelyr Jeanne A. Mabusth• • • • * w ^ ' — — Building 6 Zoning Administrator TLI.M’HONK-473-7.^57 • FVX-4734>510 JAM/lSV ./ •■,V •. ■ • 4 •'.... ■Ji ,*. * i t.k * • • ^ o OraiHAJtCS NO- 77, 2nd genes ■fcpt? *1^’ - BY*”co°“Sf fraLic%S;3 BY CDMi'-i-i-J. ^ BHiVaTS KOAD k:>'t-‘‘- 'i ■ the city council op the city op OHONO OEDAINS: section 1. Section 6.Ol,' subdivision 2 of the Municipal cod. of Orono is .hereby amended by adding the addendum sentence described below: ,*-. •* r ' ** * W^- >'. ,|VL i ' *‘l All private taei'*invitees*and*to^airpeople r*coS;d“l«oSably be th^"“nv<leeI?"' “to their private residences and thei. -nv.-ee •U section 2. This ordinance shall be published in The Laker ■ , <ew-sTi Ho o^'*sc**7ve uoon oublicstion#fe®' ar.d Tise Pioneer and shall be e-.ec —ve . T’ •«■ ^ ^jf\ hho tv Of Orono, Minnesota at a . ^L^tfng"K"t.h; ?th any Of-January, 1H90. / >[V • f ^ • . '.V? ■1^ ,' :,-rH'WV 1^1' Grab ~y)n. illin/City Clerk V.:ir^X'.. ' 2TJB80 pr t '1^ W >. . •■ . a- miM ‘•d. ,K .i-'V- < ■ ms fei^r-;- ..f • .:' ■ YVyu; ■'I-t V‘7 - g--':■ •' \e: '• it X‘ * •»■' . . "J r£r-^'V ;■ ■ ' ;9'-, V- .' ( POPHAM HAIK SCHNOBRICH a KAUFMAN. LTD OtNVCK. COi^RA&O TtL 903*BB3-1200 Miami . Fv^ioa in' Suite 3300 222 SOUTH NINTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA S5402 TEL 6 1 2-333-4800 FAX 6 1 2-334-0888 iNTCflNATIOMAL OWWICW.%: LftIPZtG. GCAMANV TKL OI 137-41 -49 19471 til 909>B30-OOJO • . ; ■ . WAiHINaTPW. O.C. J TIL 202-962-9700 vj THOMAS J. BARRETT, ESQ. DIRECT DIAL (812) 334-2878 STUTTOAHT. OIRMANY til 01149-711-296303 i\-:' May 12, 1992 n:f :j I r;*Y c.- »'•••?i: r'w— 1 . i "A VIA FACSIMILE ORIGIHAL TO FOLLOW BT 1 kill MAY 1 3 B92 m Jeanne A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Municipal Offices P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-006 Re: Application No. 1734 - John and Mary Burger 3750 Bayside Road - Preliminary Subdivision Application f.Dear Jeanne: In response to your letter of May 1, 1992 with respect to the application noted above, I point out that Orono Ordinance 601 subd. 2 specifically allows the City to regulate private roads by allowing access over them to other persons who could reasonably be expected to use the road to get to their home and to their invitees. As I understand it the potential intensification of the use is probably limited to one or two homes which may use the private road in question in order to achieve access. The alternative access which has been discussed with respect to subdivision would require, as you point out in your letter, a long and lengthy roadway through a designated wetland. ■'Yf'I also understand that we can look forward to the new users agreements to share in their prorata costs of the maintenance of the road. Thus, I conclude that the proposed use of Landmark Drive is reasonable under the circumstances and consistent with both our ordinance and other applicable law. Ifr> B/j ao/s4rrjB r:. ^ - q He-RB- -4 JLI4 '-4/^ on ■>« fi «*irii*i 11«4 ys/Se %t- Tf JiTS\ A- iarrwiFiiT ij S'*•1 1—^ i M'lAri J j THERESA i"'I ■ s m 5^ Li iM.vr fC ffi■c::? PARK Ff TIT—-im ii 1** / V s .■u. 5J^ 7 5 im tt HtlM. €P . \ 1 f s TiiTTr ifcr GTUOOG mu-aiV-ffnrRfr f - ItlV "soEnisinir c*8 iji.ii *\ K'i'* wr mmm .'j '•V % V m ;iS3rw« FROM: DATE: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator Stephen Weckman, On Site System Manager May 6, 1992 SUBJECT: Subdivision #1734, John Burger - Septic Review I have reviews^ che proposed septic system testing and design for this property aud would make the following comments. Parcel .!■ . Depth of seasonal saturation (mottling) is 1' 2" to 2’ for both primary and alternate drainfield sites. 0: Slope at both sites 1 to 3%. Percolation rates average 13.8 minutes per inch at 12 inches due to shallow seasonal saturation. .X Both sites require mound drainfields. Topographic location and site drainage is adequate. All setbacks meet city code. ,v;-v “W Based on the above soil testing information and site inspection, both drainfield sites are adequate to serve 5 bedroom home meeting all code and setback requirements. Soil testing and septic system design have been approved as submitted with the following note; snow fencing must be placed around the alternate drainfield site to assure that construction activies for both the house and the primary drainfield site do not compact this site. Snow fencing must be placed around the alternate drainfield site prior to the issuance of a building permit. Parcel A/B This lot has an existing residence with an on-site sewage treatment system. The system is listed as code conforming in compliance and the system appears to be functioning adequately at this time. A municipal sewer system has been proposed for the Stubbs Bay area and if approved would require that residence be hooked up to the sewer system within 16 months of availability. If the proposed sewer project is rejected, the septic evaluation made by City of Orono staff indi?ates that an alternate drainfield site is likely available for this residence. ''-mmsm i / i ♦ ■ % d , t.- r.•‘ S-P TESTING, INC.Steven B. Schirmers — MPCA Cert. No. 627 VI£} tVW' ■951 Katydid Lane NE • St. Michael, MN 55376 • (612) 497-3566 P'‘-- -' ■ '''m wmmmmm m:^ I.: ^ ■ =April 14, 1992 John Burger 3750 Bayside Parcel C Orono, Henn. Co., MN / / ;>■ //£ § This On-Site Sewage Treatment System is Designed for a Type l,Five bedroom home in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Chapter 7080 and local ordinances. -4M The soils on this sits are SCS soils mapped - LmB - Lerdal loam. A seasonally high water table was located at 14" to 24", (mottled soil). Due to the seasonally high water table, a Pressurized mound System will need to be installed. The bottom of the roclc bed must be located at least 3' above the seasonally high water table. The soils at a depth of 12" have a percolation rate averaging 13.8 min/inch and are adequate for treating septic effluent. -•ii A pumping chamber will need to be i.nstalled to lift the effluent to the treatment area. The manifold and supply line pipe must have back drainage to the pumping chamber. The distribution pipes shall have their ends capped. Be sure the rock and sand fill material are clean. The sod layer below the entire mounded area must be turned over, just break up the sod, be sure not to over work. The power supply and switches must be located outside the manhole and pumping chamber in a weather proof enclosure. A warning device must be installed with a light and sound device, this is in case of a pump failure. (Mercury floats are a good method). All neighboring wells are located greater than 100' away from th*^ roposed treatment area. -i; mmrn CONT* D mmmkmmm .:'y m ■4\. i . . . -i ■''n- ■'V V"' </ '.■^.-si.va John Burger 3750 Bayside Parcel C 'Orono ■t m c- ^ :• (2) ..■Hi, Keep all heavy equipment off of the proposed treatment area before and after construction. The treatment area should be marked off before construction. This Design is not valid & the System will need to be relocated if failure to protect the areas proposed for On-Site Sewage Treatment occurs. With proper installation and maintenance, this system should have no problem in treating septic effluent effectively. Nothing other than gray water, ( laundry, showers, etc.) human waste & toilet tissue should be disposed of into the septic tanks.' ^ Garbage disposals are not recommended. Additives must not be used, they may cause harmful damage to your septic system. Recommend to pump your tank every year if you have 1 tank & every 2 years if there are 2 tanks. .--'i V.•T - ■ iHKii ,J~.' : - A %S£m rV* Steven B. Schirmers •vH' 5? kT • t V- ' li I Kji l/Vi C2 'ri r- m. Ir' 1-) '\ — z s S o So 2 « R* 5^ ? r. r = y-rSD ,r • ■ }' /'■' “ * . . - ' • . • • * • • - • .-V .- •* V'.- rJ-Xf i I - ♦ . • *. ^ , '^ * - «.. . , • •, ^* • . % * ^i - \...# - ,-. - •; *•• o-M t f• •" . •• *“ . V'.. >•*.' * 4<.. ^ '.rr:-' '‘'ry--::^- ‘■'■■y.'\ •"• v'>;-nV.v.^; ^'./^v^^. - ^ //■•'• ,V’'9';'~ -.•. w'%*->*.>':‘ ^* • • — •*• * • ■/• .*•'••. V •.^.' . ■• ^ . • .#-^ • .• . . • • * : • . ... T ; ,'••• * , • . . #•'- • • » • , . , • , * ' -: ; ' • V ■■- .*•**••.; **• .•''*■ * - . • ■ ' • • • ‘ ' ;/• . V.' M •-r‘ ORDINANCE NO. SECOND SERIES redescribing ^e TegaT descriptions^ ofwithin the RR-IA and LR-IA Zoning Districts of the City. The City Council of the City of Orono Ordains: The Municipal Code of the City of Orono is amended by adding Ordinance No. 2J l* Second Series: ■m -i ■ V ■r -Jr ■. y. . mmwm amlndi"g^the''o«i”cTa\“zoni^ Use district B°""daries Districts as follows: RR-IA - uonunenciny au unc: - ------------ -- --- 4_v,_ th"e Easterly along the North line of the Corporate Limits to the interaction of the N line and the center line of Wayzata Boulevard; thence Southeasterly along the center y Boulevard to the center line of Wayzata Boulevard Stubbs s Bay Road; thence Southwesterly along the center to its intersection with the center line of the Luce Line Trail, thence Northwesterly along the center line of the at^ the Westerly line of the Riedel1 Company Stubbs Bay Addition plat^ thence Southerly along said line 283.68 feet; thence Westerly 1 - feet parallel with the Northerly line of Section 5; thence Soutnerly parelltl wllh the best line of Section 5 to the center line of Bayside Road; thence Westerly and Southerly along the Road to the Corporate Limits of the City of Orono; thence Northerly along said Corporate Limits to the point of beginning. Commencing at the Northwest corner of the City of O^ono; Township 118r Range 23: All of the South 1/2 of Section 2 lying southerly of the Burling Northern Railroad EXCEPT that which is within the City of Wayzata. That part of the South 1/2 of Section 4 lying Westerly and Southerly of County Road No. 84. All that cart of the south 1/2 of Section 5, Township 117, Range 22 lying easterly of Stubbs Bay, Northerly of Ni^rtheasterly of the channel between Stubbs Bay and Maxwell Bay. That part of North 1/2 of Section 5, Township 117, 23 consisting !f A'. ^32,^3i^3/^'s,^V6,^V2,“57,^Vs,^U,^“6b, = il,%^2, l3, a^*d that portion of Lots 37, and 40 and the South 550 feet of Lot 5 3 of Auditir's Subdivision No. 203 lying Southerly of the Luce Line Trail m 1 o A s 6 and 8 of Bayside Addition- al3- of Bayviev, Burger's Bayside Addition. Wmm Jl • * \-’ ■ *^-. • - 1 •'•■wr*> .; . 7 .• ■ ■•’ ■ pA '■'r ' '■•>#;■ ■ 'V V , . i - • -i-’'•V ‘'' ■.V‘- i,#f>.-, . r ~ Section 2. This Ordinance shall be published in the Laker & Pioneer Newspapers and shall be effective upon publication. vote of Passed by the City Council this 30th day of March, 1987, by a 5 ayes and _2_ nays. I***. ATTBS James R. Grabek, Mayor rV i • Published in the Laker & Pioneer April_____, 1987. Newspapers on the 13th day of * .-iV .. fi.:. . AM'-'- ’■ .K' ' . : 5*- . ,• 9 'r f [ ' . W'h'A i:.,.; :'>'fSv ' :*V"' .‘-='.-" y . V KrW'Ml ■ % ■:4 |K;ill!. :'i.1^*: -i' ■^'. it ii.'-^:..0; wv« .’,i ? 7>T-‘ A‘ ^ '■3 ; i p^- iHBr*'"" t. ; o^*aLT/ r ,' V»- . *■'' : m.T<*.'.i :?■Ai'i aM t / •. v> " r»* ‘"v ■*. • * ■* •1' . » ; ^>A - -n j5vi ..>v> 'IfcH*. •'■. .-r • j. Chairman Kelley and Planning Coiranission Members Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator May 11, 1992 Subject: #1679 William Miller, 2691 Casco Point Road Variance ~ Continuation of Public Hearing Status of Application --.■mx. l' , / ^ .r*' f-'X- -"V- r • "I*.. ;*• ■ Application #1679 involved an after-the-fact variance dealing with unauthorized structural improvements and expansion of a gazebo/bathhouse located within the 0-75' setback area of the property and a hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback area for the proposed construction of a 22' x 26' detached garage to replace the existing 14' x 22' garage. At the September 16, 1991 meeting of the Planning Commission, the application was divided into two parts. The Planning Commission voted to approve the variance for the improvement of the gazebo/bathhouse structure and advised applicant the detached garage portion of the application would be tabled pending applicant's submittal of a revised plan that further reduces hardcover in the 75-250' zone. At the October 14, 1991 meeting of the Council, Council unanimously voted to table all action of the gazebo portion of the application until the Planning Commission had completed the review of the proposed garage improvement so cnat Council would be able to review the comprehensive improvement of the project and then determine the impact upon the ordinances. Mr. Miller has resubmitted an updated survey, hardcover inventory by the surveyor and an amended plan for Planning Commission's review. List of Exhibits X'X'i^X X A - Council Minutes ol0/14/91 B-1-3 Hardcover Inventory C - Survey 1/27/92 D - Amended Plan E - Original Plan Review of Revised Hardcover Pacts 0-75' setback area « 4,500 s.f. Existing = 344 s.f. or 7.64% (original estimate 5.5%) 'V mi- 75-250' setback area* « 10,500 s.f. Existing - 4,544 s.f. or 43.28% (original estimate 37%) Proposed with amended plan « 3,438,95 s.f. or 32,75%* 250-500' setback area * 1,933 s.f. Existing = 104 s.f. or 5.38% (original estimate 4.4%) * 'W. X' hi ^7 Zoning File #1679 May 11, 1992 Page 2 “Vf -' ’'. .-v- x^v:v House = 1,033 s.£. Chimney = 11 s.f. A/C pad = 9 s.f. New driveway = 923.7 s.f. Existing driveway = 362.25 s.f. New garage *= 572 s.f. Sidewalk = 453 s.f. Stone wall = 53 s.f. Wood wall = 22 s.f. TOTAL = 3,438.95 s.f. or 32.75% "Review of Current Proposal Applicant proposes construction of a 22* x 26' garage that meets all required setbacks, doors face street and an adequate area has been provided for turn around on-site. Applicant proposes removal of existing gravel drive areas and dog run to reduce hardcover from 43.28% to 32.75%. Please note by placing garage within existing graveled area, the new construction will have no impact on sloping topographies to the south as did the original proposal (review Exhibits C and E). Ci Issues for Consideration 1. *•Are pxoposed hardcover remova].s sufficient to support new structural hardcover within the 75-250' setback area? Additional structural hardcover = 260.39 s.f. Are there existing improvements that can be further reduced? Any recommendation of approval must include the condition that hardcover improvements scheduled for removal must be completed at the time of the final inspection for the new construction. Isv Mm V . . ,w'i ■■■■■■■ im m A •* t --------------------------------------■. .■ ■ ^ r; WP-- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - OCTOBER U, i§§4 •i-t,'.(#5) #1629 DUNCAN MACMILLAN 1700 FOX STREET VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3026 Jim McNulty was present to represent the applicant. Moorse explained this Is a request to construct an open carport In lieu of the previously approved garage. p?“:c;. *Sr!"’ML^n^an“:weS'’?hrt“::rt^ria:? r^^ues^’h^woufd have concerning this property. McNulty explained that the project went overbudget and the owners realized they would prefer a carport to meat their needs. Mayor Peterson asked how wo would handle the situation when In a year they come back and want the garage. ;jGaffron noted that the resolution addresses this potential. concerns. Gaffron noted there were no,other concerns. jabbour asked If covenants were ever ^J" °%afJ^onrestricting further development of the p. operty. confirmed they had been filed. ;;.nr “o;* ,r;; (#6) #1679 WILLIAM MILLER 2691 CASCO POINT ROAD VARIANCE - PARTIAL REVIEW William Miller was present for this applicatio'^ Konrse explained that this portion mSlnte^^nce’^Sf arLls^Inriazebo/bathhouse In the 0-75' zone. Goatten felt she could not m'ake a decision without reviewing the entire property and the proposed garage Improvemen... * /, n M 'm 1’ • "V :.ii- f - ^ 1^; C '-aj:^ 1 liftf* a ------ ^ —-fllrfi MINUTES OF THE REOULAfi ORONO COUNCIU MEETINO - OCTOBER 14, 19S1 • ^ , / #1679 - CONT. Miner noted that at the Planning Commission meeting, Jabbour noted that the application could be split and this portion sent on to the Council for review. He noted that Gaffron also suggested at the time of filing the applicat-*on that they be put together, to be reviewed as a compreher, jive plan for the property. He noted that the garage portion of the application was going to be denied at the Planning Commission so they tabled instead to allow the applicant time to submit revised plans. Jabbour noted that they choose to separate tho application because this part spearheaded the entire application and because of the urgency to finish the bathhouse. m Jabbour noted that one issue is the structure cannot be improved more than 50% of the 1975 valuation, which must be determined. Gaffron stated that this structure was never valued or recorded by the assessor. even It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to table application #1679 for William Miller of 2691 Casco Point Road, requesting approval of after—the—fact variance request for maint /’lance to an existing bathhouse/gazebo. Ayes 4, nays 0. Miller noted ha has a problem with tabling the application, also noted that he would withdraw the garage portion of application right now if it would allow them to vote on bathhouse portion of the application. He noted that he has Intention to build Just a two car garage as suggested by Planning Commission. He the the no the Mabusth noted that to date revised plans have not been received by staff. • Mayor Peterson noted that if the applicafit withdraws the application —and then later reapplies, he will have to pay the application fee again and will probably be charged an after-the- fact fee because work was continued after notification. Miller explained that the siding was put on after Jhe stop work order but only for preservation raasons because of high winds. Mayor Peterson reminded Council that the first issue to is whether the repairs to the structure are over 50% of the total valuation of the structure.‘‘ Goetten understood that normal maintenance has always^been allowed by Counci 1such as painting, but footings are considered structural. * Mayor Peterson noted it is Orono's hope to soma day remove alT of these non-conforming structures through this process. ■ 1^^.. •^5 '.I ■ 'j W^r'i- ’wr^ MINUTES OF THE RE8ULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINQ - OCTOBER 14, 1991 JaSbL; askid 1f the back of the bathhouse Is the retalhihg wall. i'i M 4-H ^e He stated that only two new footings wI^l*^nl?2^1ed ahd felt this did not exceed 50» of the value as the entire structure should be considered as a whole. Goetten asked who makes the determination on the 50%. jabbour noted the Council is responsible for making that determination. Callahan felt the enclosure should be treated as a new structure. Miller noted the ;j^%/“fatrly°ne2 hoSeowner In Orono Ir°w:rC^Iwar^or?he'?uteS. He would not have risked losing the bathhouse. removed. Jabbour asked if this were would have to be removed or just the bathhouse. S,.;r.lt indicated whatever portion the Council deemed appropriate. felt he was treated unfairly. MOOS noted she did not feel he was treated unfairly or unjustly by the Planning Commission. Goetten advised that each application Is looked at Individually br^hrcommlsslon as each has different circumstances. (#7) #168^ DAVID & ANNE GRAHAM 2745 SHADYWOOU ROAD VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3027 ^oolicatlonDavid Graham was present for this application. existing patio/deck area. Mabusth concurred iS^the^m1d-sect1on°of^^the *house!°"thea second story addition In the mid section or removal of an existing patio «rea and three season po replacing It * ":at?o‘’sLn b; reJiLeS w!?h a trellis andthree-season porch ai.d a- _,q hardcover."natural ground cover rostored resulting In no hardcover. 8 A c J'/CC /'i/CLtf^ $ •%# • i« •• - if HARDCOVPR.CALCULATION WORKSHEET. SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE' ONE) Co-75^ 75-250' 25f^-. ^n' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone ^"vV A* House 2 LENGTH • 5^ % * ^WIDTH mi tt”**' /BgfM / •• -t-: r.-; ‘Mu ■• • •• • fhc^ B. Garage c. Driveway ' D.. S idewalk ' Brl ^7 • • • •.« «• •#*«»* • < ■% * E. Patio / 3eck • • • »■ • • •*< /g7 F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN »-™ 8Y ■ . ,W4 plastic # sheeting ^IS V‘ t ■/• ¥ V- • • • - #r» itS* ^ i : •<•* *1*-*.G. Other Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone 4600 S.F, • • • • S.F, S.F, S.F, S.F, S.F. S.F, S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F. _ S.F. , S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F 1%'i ..V % *> B 244 B X IQO 7.4,4 % »• • • M • . •• • • . •• #••• P*l^ •• • .•••• • * W, :-A< 1 m m m Pfeu-:. Kiiii mmmi wm mm Wl ^W-> i pK3 mm »vm Si |«lii Si ^ -.*rr 1 .' rsWj^T7. '^mmtmimm Bi '••■ffiM K lil■'>■•-• u-' ^MPHm t.'. ,-',%s iMifl m »KcS/ ;r ’ \ -7 ■ -9 ••»»« HARDCOVPil.CALCULATIOM WORKSHEET ScTBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE'ONE) 0-75' 75-250' /?B0-500'J) 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone Hou^e mtA S,F. LENGTH WIDTH • • • • S.F. i » . •*.»S.F, :.v ■•" \ * ' . --.V/ -^A S.F. • • I* • •V S.F. B. Garage «• •* #\ « S.F. c. Driveway _ //104.S.F, :v t f S.F. D.. Sidewalk J_± ?a4' . % ••• E. Patio/ Deck r—' - • f.U ndscape areas UNDERLAIN BY ■ , , PLASTIC SHEETING S.F. •\ • S.Fi S.F. • • S.F. S,F, S.F. S • F • * • . •• • ir*i’StF. . SiFi •Total Hardcover in Zone . S.F. Total Property Area in Zone H33 S.F . 2- /f-f^ ^ B n • • /z>4> • *r r1 X 100 • ^^3S>__.% r. • • • ••« -• ••• a a a* «a a a. • «>• #,»• r • *• • • • ** a... •■•ir Vi. af/> 'a \ SkfST-Jc- y^s /hu./^T /?^p fl S-->) Haifj //*,. Y. hat/i *>(vi ? T^ k ••••< vll\ A2 ?. '^ • 1K “ii\ X .. *7S'^ - / /o 9 ■Ato ^ To /Co T~o r-\ ^ — ^-^Oosss' IS - J^S’O '=Cj 7 y 'x £^f ^U7SA(oO^ yo^oo^ ^ ^ ^{/o X'CoO = ^ - /iOp .fir" >7 J^O£> ^ <gC<o r/Vi^ g , o- 7-^"!g /3^75J^ y^:t*xScr == C'j'^y/0 - /yj ^ (/y^A 3 0 r: y^. --O' •3.y9 -g- 7rix<rb ^ ^ ^<=>ct5e" (Tac.^xyj^i) /^r/o ViO Aeo/icxix 7o JO- 74T6 JoS J?- ^^72^ » 3 C ^<K y y ^( X /A r4jeo bittjs'iMT C'o.sks'rO == yy?4> iS‘(> j S*¥? ^ ■TmHmm AJb L^ g /^co bAiUCiUy ^ TOfS" A,/o) 3. y ?o S&- >m:m /o^ y^jT i5- PP /oT^^ sxfsyk/4^/iMj^cou^ /,z vyjff- ^OWc^< K c^'Sr/J6---As /^u.tLT' j^r-o/fe-AT^^ /7»taOyxyj?> 1^ — 7 /4/C mmI ^\%^> Vv.. V >, . k ^ riA * f .f»-. J PMIw j^. Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Fr<^ Date: Si^jects Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator May 11, 1992 * V #1724 Tammy L. Woodis, 28880 Casco Point Road - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing The applicant has advised that she will be able to attend the May 18th meeting of the Planning Commission, The application has been rescheduled for continuation of the public hearing. The original packet has been recopied for Planning Commission's review. Isv •i' »?>*; myimnA m- ...mm.-:- 111 ■•• ' ' . ■ - * -Vi • -V vmmmi ’''C' ''r,f HMMMM i'/-',. ■• r<’ mm .f,-. csaii sMSfilig^ w;-,..:;:r.-'v- ' 'V, 3 ’ *‘vOv.V .- p.'•: #^ * N tSt-a' ■ * ' » a !■:-■ ^FTT* .• ^ m r ' t ■'*' ’ * '• • Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator April 14, 1992 #1724 Teurany L. Woodis, 2818 Casco Point Road - Conditional Use PermitAariance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.03, Subdivision 10 - A conditional use permit is required for in ground pool/patio to be located on a through lot in a residential district. Section 10.75, Subdivision 4 (A) - Setback front and rear required for accessory structures on through lots. Required = 30' Proposed front = 108* Proposed rear = 194' Ordinance requirements are satisfied. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Lot coverage. Total lot area * 24,700 s.f. Lot coverage =» 3,705 s.f. or 15% Proposed *= 3,592.7 s.f. or 14.5% [Review Exhibit G] Ordinance requirements are satisfied. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover variance within the 250-500' setback area. Total area «• 17,800 s.f. Allowed = 5,340 s.f. or 30% Proposed « 5,552 s.f. or 31% Variance * 212 s.f. or 1% 500-1,000' area * 6,900 s.f. Allowed * 2,415 s.f. or 35% Existing » 0 Proposed = 0 Total lot area = 24,700 s.f. Allowed 7,410 s.f. * 30% of the total lot area Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (E) - Accessory structures in excess of 750 s.f. footprint area but not exceeding 1,000 s.f. Footprint area shall be located at least 15' from any lot line. Pool basin meets required 15' setback from all side and rear lot lines. ■ . • ^ ■ V. wy..,mm IIt: t:- ' ^ i;-. 4 i 'J * >ii ■A Zoning Memo #1724 April 14, 1992 Page 2 List of Exhibits A - Application B - Applicant's Addendum C - Property Owners List D - Plat Map E - Legal Combination P - Hardcover Facts G - Staff's Inventory of Hardcover and Lot Coverage Information H - Staff's Sketch I - Survey of Proposed Improvements I>e8criptioii of RcKjaest L'*^, ^ i -- V*’ Applicant seeks approval of a conditional use permit for the installation of a pool to the north or rear of the residence on a through lot. As already noted, a conditional use permit is required for all accessory structures on through lots. It was the original intent of the applicant to legally combine the parcels so that a variance would not be required. Upon review of the hardcover facts, it was determined that a hardcover variance within the 250-500' setback area at 1% would be needed to approve the proposal as presented. Applicant may be advised to reduce 212 s.f. of hardcover or members may be asked to consider the remaining portions of the property within the 500—1,000' setback area. 6,900 s.f. does not contain any hardcover improvements. With total lot area at 24,700 s.f., applicant would be allowed a total of 7,410 s.f. or 30% hardcover. If applicant was to attempt to relocate pool in the northern areas of the property, the application as proposed would require a setback variance because of the limited 50' width. Note the required 10' separation has been maintained from pool basin to 2nd story deck structure shown at 12 1/2'. As already noted above, the applicant has satisifed all standards for the conditional use permit as structure meets the required 30' setback from both front and rear Ic; lines. As for hardships for the variances phase of the application, staff would note the following: a) Shape of lot. b) There is no hardcover within the 500-1,000' setback area. Such area consists of total of 6,900 s.f. c) All pertinent standards for the conditional use permit for accessory structures on the through lot have been satisifed. Options of Action Approval as proposed, or Approval subject to the following conditions: Removal of reduction in proposed hardcover. s.f. of existing hardcover or i ii .'lllfckll . ‘ >*. ^■V;- ■ , ,1. 'M-i fj O A // CITO OP ORONO - n-,nmir. LMID use ___^____ jA JL. PROPERTY LOCATION C''Site Address 3N ^ -'!'< r/-i-v c Property Identification Nurober (P.I.D.) t Please attach legal description to application if not includedg|K irxeaoG ------ p on required survey. ______________________________________ ^ -------- mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm <mm mm — ^ ^ ^ ^ / f / ^ _ _ - APPLICANT ..— tiMA^V i- LLWOplS _ Address j ^ C. H S( (._ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ ___ _ _ ___ ___ _ _ _ _ _ V «^ -t. Address Phone ^vnrk)^/J-7 /_^ City ^'i^(T» t^L^' Zip__^S-l-ii^ Phone (home)- - - -- - - - Phone _ _ ___ _ _ ___ _ _ _ ___ _-— City_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __Zip, r (Lf (^rn^tf ^^srown the adiacent_p_arcg^f_land. (month/year) ■0^i fees - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - Rianewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee Wter-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee m\'ti^ $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application i .'i % % $125.00 Residential accessory Use _ _ $150.00 Institutional (c.hurch, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _ $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration CITY Of OTiOHd C'FrJwu 1350200000 01 t'tTV i'yc: . 4. C. tJ m V in.f4 4m VH£CK TL ll£C£IPT-I'iiiit ’i< you tT4m*/iJ^Q^■^^230 cool ROl Tl' ■X o3/o: Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain a”diS^/sta«ill\'"ret’aining wall; within 75' of laXeshore PRD/PID “ see fee schedule M OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $100.00 commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation . j j Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning <PUD - refer to fee schedule) Appeals 1 i^r ^1^ m mm- ^ 9m Other - see fee schedule PRESENT OSS OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District .VX Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify)_. DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: 2. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS List of owners within 350- (you can obtain thH list f^^rHen'nepin county Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. » Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed land Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). ?onstructiln plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). L an addendmn to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. vnn ARE RROUIRED TO SDPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCDMKHTS SDBMl-PTTO. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this applicatio^ Please rS^em'bl^rnhSt Vur%;;nca\7on ir;o^ complete if the above information has not been included. _ _ _ _ _ __ Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: - - - - - - - - - - - - -- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _rc ^Sf^^HcanrJJ^by agrees to provide all information required by the zoning Administrator, _agpe_s^ to^pay ^additio^^ tTme^not^covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred Jfre^!L orthis application, and'^ certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. or (staff Applicant's signature 6>-/ :.n Date ^ - -gf I? ?^n“'^'^y acknowledges and agrees to this app 1 icatio„ and f urther r%«;UTe “ thi property by Ci^y staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members fo p p investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature / p nA'SA.u h Y LU ' /f-r.dn Date •3- ‘-yj AppIIcan7must have all submittals fabo bhe *:!^!- offices 25 the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commis|sion Meeti g ocheduled third Monday of each month. Applicants must be aoolicant is review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an appl “tr ;ttVnd''‘a ''^ch^d-ulea meeting, authorized agent attend in your place and advise the BuL..iing s ^ Office of this change prior to the meeting. tit- ‘'A .<T ■ U:: m *T# in nt il isr_ 'Ui •J: f£SWiXSi i • ry ■- ' ■ ZXS l !66?4 rS6 (2!) ^ C .''A «^n;«t ?’6.i? '•'5^/'" ? 1 ^OIN'T ^Oi'CiiOi^.^Oi *0i« 1 K o I e ;^-»^•. . .9! . ^ TXT i.i iSC"®)' »5i*,4 !/ •4.H !:“. "VS) I 40'40/ .:••••■ -(3) if/W//WyyM^ a? 3f TTTTTT'/'Jt^A^ o ^ '<♦ «i /& v«0 j/t A5}JW/ k?%! ...... . (Z5) -7 . '■"^ /i.' s-;< (33)jp. (3^1. i \ k/- I 9)':: f .»/> »» -y / ^h. /?/V /, Vyitt-'f. '•■jM -/(a’,^‘V ^y's7z^./ '>^XJ(<^,, -X (56 ) K "i ^ >'A%' (20UV1-O 3 /4r (22) :i^) USI . C9) 5'k4- x\ (2S) r-3 bUHti. •V-i-.'i. i >««V H o nuissss3 H m *19m > » V -< >> m z o o » > o o 3 ^ ;d m ...i.- * W g * O W V -< O' o •• -^ 6!'"5<.S;mn ;o C M 90 » O 01 > ^ Q rs» 01^ z c. N ^> n <n ^ rs9H n a z o ^ 5 c z Mz o aoMz o o m > ^ z m (/) I ^ C Z Q W HZ O 0« in B 09ih z m z NT meoww o %o M M Z o S Z 0^ c o ►• ■ 4 mm :•- z rs) e e o w > H rv9 OiH ^ e e H N Ilf ^ > z z III n>H o C c o> > z z •woo M3 o V X O Mz o e e > Hw • z r* r- n fs> o o w In M N Nin ^ m hi z row H z z o w sO z z M M Z M M m m z H z z o I I z z o o iz M m m o gi> ^ r- r- M •< > ► H V z z W IM -4 o m m m > >w m m M 3 o r- o M z z w n M H O O WIn m z in z z z M w o M o w vo n M^ » 5s M 3 - ;*-v^ ii-..,' . -^'v •■••:•. ■>. '^vr- .■ « . •.. . V • ^ • «' . , <• , . « • . . ■ «• •(.<»• ' . ■♦. 4t mm H O Z > Z Z X Z O _ z m z m > z N. -< >> m z o o z > o O 3 Z z m Z M 3 3 O W > H > > M 5 H ^ Z Z H H o m m > > 3 o % % n M z w w n fsi o o o o w in M z ~ In z W HvO •'-S Z M O W M Z o H o M Z fS> Z Z O 01 > O NO-< o ec o MM O > X X M H O > > O> > c c • WWW Mj o m m n Mo z z > M W I z §• •• o rsi H o oin z z «n z z N OI O 3 3 O Oi ii5| W Z m X o z > 5mz X N X z e Oi > H > > N Oi H >0 Z Z H M >o m m ^ > _ Z Z ^ IM HO m > X X I Mo o n M Z Z > M H H W •g m m n N ii u-SSS®*- ^ O O M -s 5S gw. (( .( V ar^ ' * 9 H O Z lil-- {T|>Z -<mo z - _ O 3 Z z m H Z > 3 Z m > V. H > m O z o z mz zzoz .v.^. 3m >ooz ^ z V > M Z Oi X V M o w M H H < O z w H o o om ml O IsoZ o z O m m z w H W N Oi IM 0 1 M M M Iro 04 •< M M in O' H in ro o M > in < in M HO® > > W Wis;; z > w,-*5 in z Oi o oz M m M O O Oi N Oi W H in «i in IM C0zm M I I M O M S'!* O IM O Oi Z N O Oi § mz 3 ’-X ^ z n w o OI V. > M -4 O Oi M Z H > O Oi X H H Oi m Oi IM §r- ? ZOOM O O t Z O Z IM O m m Oi z w N M%o X IM H H O W > Oi >• > N O b=II5. HO O i3 iS Ommo H W IM Oi Min O' 325 O W t z X o n N o g M o Oi in M 5 w in z o z IM Oi H M O Oi Hin w M w M M W M Zo M Z O H O o Z Oi O X IM Z Z O W > M O O IM OI •< M r* r- H M O' m m H > Z Z O' IM HO O > > > >w g O Z Z O M Z Z > H M M W I in M 55*o^ s Z O O O No m m o Oi m z IM HOW SSe X' z o w o w M > M -4 o Oi M Z H >- O W X •< H W V m Oi IM MO o >o z r- I > M o Z > M W ZOOMH g o ( Z O Z IMO o m m wm z w m H W IM M IM M in O' M t c «yr : V •r,n* . ■* ■ ‘-..r f'S^y n\ V.M #in m \ >ooz H g zsisz m z > z •< > m z O z > o z z m Ho c o > fM O' >o M o >woo X o m X 2^ > o w IM Oi O' M IM ow N. IM z o in M in Z W H M Zo X > I M M M I IMw ■tr: vv‘ 3 IMw zo e o o X' . f- ■ 4W ■, V\ . r # >•0. , . • *. • A» . . - • X IM H H O w > M m fM Oi < M Z X M N in Z M > H O in IM H O> > m • w 5 ^ M O X X o M O M > Ms S3 w • O IMo w in Z H W H z SD H M Zo r* 35 Mz mz H o o z In o X N W W O W > M M IM Oi •< 4> m Z M M in < ^ > m z in fM H o z m O > > H Iw z m M 3 0 Z O M Z O Z W > Mm g w I Z H Z QIM O m O w in M 4 . V*. - ••• -jrr-’i-* - •*'•. •. < V • • v’ *• .; V.-.-*’ fL-: '** ' '''V. r r» - / I* -»► TV. ' .■:» # i*.*' • • , . » !»■ r *^■*5*.* •i.. s', \ -4# .% .vVf. ‘ : — . • ' • f ...•^ . * . t— a ^ Atf V' Ijyn -4 o -n xi3 § -XI m -0 m > 79 g m z a_ »•> a a 3» 90 m z o o o M > Oi m rs9 9 *. ;• X ro f“ r- o w > oi m M 9 -< M O n 0» C'^laSfo H n 90 o 3 n i* o o M So S > ^ 3 S 9 • -5 > m o M O 90 v> O 9 9 M <9 z 2 w 9 H > o rvj 'O Z a H> 90 2 z 0 ?;1m (/» o H O H» 90 r\>o 'I'Vri , ti iP «.' ■*'fi <'4 X M -4 -4 O W > 01 X z rv9 Oi^si|s > > O M H n 9 o» o > > IVI Oi 9 ^ M 30 n M M M 9 } 3S3S0! In M X M o o o m > 9 X X fvj 09 •< M m m 9 N M Z Z H* > a fV9 H n r- o o > > r- 9 X -< M in Z w H >o 'Ml',-' :r,"vv : ,: > ■ ;■ * ' 'll • ^3 3 538*”^ 3 in M*«5iM >0 M X O 9 O 9 • O fO X O 9 O 9 2 ^9 O M M 5S S’- •• 4.V /V - i', • H O X m > X gm2 _ X > o D Z X X m X ro o o o 9 > 9 > > M 9 -< fV9 < < 9 M in M M fV) > o o in lU H o > > c. c. 9 0 1 M3 n < -< o H* S o o o > X X 9 I X X X n fo 0 9 9 0 9 in M in z 9 H "•3 3 9X9o rsi X M M z OX -I o m o X 9o X M X X O 9 >90 r^9 9 «< ro z m 9 M M > M > r- o H» r\j H n o m 0 > > 3 •999 M z n ZOJ-* Z O 3 > > -s> X 9 • XX o ro 0 0 9 0 9 In M > in z X 3 X 9 9 H m o M >0 H 3 M MX Z O O O O H o mm o 9 o - X X M X X O 9 > 9 m m iN> 9 •< M 9 9 9fM *^4 r- f- M > m m -*4 M H O •< -< o > > _ •9 0 0 M 30 OM 2 O 9 Oi > *^-< -< 9 • X X X O M O Z Z O 9in M m m X 9in Z 9 H sO M X C -4 0 X • H 0 X 9 ^Si.3 i^l 3 > H S55*" ...... V << > ' z X ni m > X s. •< X ► 0 Z 3S^S > m Z a X > 0 0 e S S*• 0 3 X m X 9 H W X M H H 0 9 > 9 > 9 rvi 9 : -< M 3 3 N 9 2 3 9 M ■ > -< 5 9 fS> H 0 0 9 -< O O I M O 9 IX X o n ro o o M o 9 in M o 9 in z o X 9 9 -4 M o rv» 'O 9 M MX Z o a Hoo X in o 4. •- • X ro > >0 9 > 9 r-fS) 9 -< 9 X ••9 N in X 9 > m X in iN> -4 0 0 0 > > M 1 9 > <M 3 0 m 0 M z 0 9 X 9 9 •X X m 0 X 0 0 Z 0 9 in M 9 in Z m X 9 9-4 3 0 M >0 >M M X X 0 -<H 0 in M S'*m X9•/ f - s •1 .• o 9 V* M N* fS» r ■ . • I .> -«9 • ^ X fJ CO 9 o 9 > 9 m m IN} 9 << rv) < < 9 C90099 ^ m m rvi X 4^ fN>o >>-<-< * 9 MZ O X X O M So > HM -4 9 I X X X n Mo m m o 9In M m m In Z O o X 9 9 -i << -< o M vO M MX Z O a HOo go> , m m -< ^ N ^ ^ o X > Hz z ^ rsi ,00 M Z O X X O M2 O m m > ^ M M 9 I 9 < M ^ m M O 9 O ,r - - > r« X rs9 z 9 9 o 9 > 9 > X rvi 9 -< M X •< m 9 fM >0 -< O IM > m X rvi H o X m o > ► > m -4 • ^ -4 m M sX IN> H H O > 9 > > rvi^sii? > > r- r- I 9 -< M Z O X X o M2 o X m 9 > -^ m -4 o 9 i X -4 m z o rv> O m X 0 9 In M X 9 9 in z 9 O _ X 9 ^ Z M 5"Mb? X X O O M O O M O 9 ‘ V 4 • • t • r '» 4 ■ *. 7 *^ « • : JL ^ *v t *<•. -t.,:f.r ^ V ^ . 4- . . *.*.■ » V ‘V I* 14 ■•••*■ ••• ■V’H".-. % ’ - I t- ' -V • . ' , • ■ * »•• ’% .* • ' ■< . di. C . .-5,' ■- '1..:.'«, .'r KF%.; ,. T-i^ o */j.-.. 4 .•/ r*^- y,%', • -i ■". > '• .$ .— - . %; • ; - f 4* ■• . •? * <»..•,., 4 • V ' ' I - ?•• ^**4 ■}-. -■•»: .NO '• -• *>-.)^.. i •*-1 »*.' * “ V " ;>r»■ *V'. *•**■•’• • •’‘mwsHe ■' • s ■•' • ■' ■ . r- 2 HM o 3 (/>iTi^ - m m > 04 -fi -T9 H 90 •' *V .■ *• -i-W' • r w * *' 0**« . • ' » • ' • . 1 * r^/ ' • *w*' * • i • M• » • •* » * ' * •.: V '0sS . V -.•.V , J - * •.* ..•••-• • 4 • V • '4' ^^. ;A.y;'t,•.«sf • , ; S I. O > £ . : •... I* • • V * , *« e nI o f\9 ‘ • - T’ . w: '■ 'V i-’ . *:! ' V ■ >>/* *• • ■.?;• ■4 o. .•.■ * ..s- Y; •■ ''*•■ .' >-.11 .} ‘ r> f • 1 . .. i • f. *. . ■« •fc **.^•fV ” ^ .. / '. XC^' m •V H *3O -om -n :sD » H O -< •« m •>,••• /• < m » M r- o M 9 i35 HM w': ■. •. '-"■r. * • -• * VVT f \ .. >1, ^.iv^^.. . . :/. -A ft' gm «* *rvt M - • ?• ■ s g - ..: r T ■• ■ .• '^;. -. - V- •■ * .t'v‘ •■ V': X-1X • CITY of ORONO MunkifMl OfBces Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MinnesoU 5532W1066 i- •* I . ■!■ :/ ■ V-l iWl Date:0'9o K t V- Hennepin County Government Center Department of Property Tax & Public Reco,rds Attn: Don Deutschr ID Controller A 607 Minneapolisr MN 55487 Dear Mr. Deutsch: I (we) hereby make request for a combined assessment on the following described land: 'H Legal Descriptions Lot 26, Block 4, Casco Heights 2818 Casco Point Road - 20-117-23 32 0004 mi-m ► •; Lot 21, Block 4, Casco Heights - 20-117-23 32 0005 Lot 16, Block 4, Casco Heights - 20-117-23 23 0008 Address: 2818 Casco Point Road Municipal Code: 38 For 1992 Tax Year signature oj Fee Owner(s)Signature off Tax Pay«Payer( . “I-,. •. y. V . .4 • •' < ; • f . •• V I 4v»V I ■ I*^ ;» ' ** C(%CO Tax Payer's Address mil TEI-EPHOSE - 473-7357 • FAX • 47341510 ■%, 't, ‘ .______ TU,-.., : Liifu:.- ■ ■..■-V:-:'^-'":"’HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEEl SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0“75' 75-2^' (^50-500^ 5C0-1Q00' Existing Hardcover in Zone 1 LENGTH I'S oli/\ fiu lA_2i§. mn 1*mm&M ¥T:V^' B. Garage c. Driveway y < -. 3; ■tm:D. Sidewalk » u. m§m fei'-v II i inmm V - ‘ ■ S '■ -y^. E. Patio/ Deck 3 ‘-i F.Landscape AREAS underlain BY plastic SHEETING €• Other WIDTH I i 0-2 h u i :i j % !I Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone B S.F. ■ ■.TL*r 'tiL: S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F / • v^yL S.F. * '2 ^• / S.F. S.F. ixa S.F. <» /' S.F. IM S.F. I/C S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.B X 100 % =fc i r * ****** w 1 ■ • iiftiir jtM S**^ - :**.*■ Ifew^SMiu- i:.v-■;< -mm V:: P»;f- EXHIBIT "G" Staff Inventory of Lot Coverage and Hardcover Facts m .■'mij Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) 78.7 s.f. shed 1568 s.f. house 380 s.f. three-season porch 800 s.f. pool basin 766 s.f. patio area Total *» 3,592.7 s.f. or 14.5% Coverage Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover improvements within 250-500' setback area Area « 17,800 s.f. 20.5 X 58 » 1,189 s.f. driveway 24.5 X 64 « 1,568 s.f. house 12 X 5.5 « 66 s.f. stoop [40 X 10 “ 400] [30 X 6 - 180] Total 580 s.f. = deck/three-season porch [2nd floor] 47.5 s.f. landscape timbers 25 X 3 ** 75 s.f. cement walk 6.05 X 1.75 “ 10.5 s.f. chimney 9.6 X 8.2 = 78.7 s.f. shed 18 X 25 = 450 minus 78.7 of shed area » 371.3 s.f., cement slab 40 X 20 = 800 s.f. pool basin 54 X 29 * 1,566 s.f. minus pool * 766 s.f. patio pimmi Total 5,552 s.f. or 31% 'WM ¥m% Vz rmm i. ■■ h' <* *•> ■ .‘t;■ ■m- m- /•••I- . m Wlit I ■■ f nH ■>» - K.I .‘i . V’ • •a -.V ••-'I. .- "li-t *,\ .‘V;, : ,• ■A > ’. • y': ■ -/r.. ii‘*» 'ir-r .- .• )■ r .* • • 'aO.’ To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator May 11, 1992 #1729 Clair Rood, 3280 Navarre Lane - Residential Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Continuation of a Public Hearing Zoning Districts LR-IC, Lakeshore residential requiring a 1/2 acre dry contiguous land Status of Application At the April 20th meeting of the Planning Commission, the application was tabled providing the applicant additional time to submit to the City a revised survey confirming that proposed Parcel A contains a half acre of dry contiguous land. The City staff has received confirmation from the attorney's office that the original conservation and flowage easement taken over the wetland area as shown on the attached survey and the 15' drainage easements was filed with the Torrens Office (Document #2237882). List of Exhibits - A - Revised Survey B - Staff's Sketch C - Staff's Memo dated April 16, 1992 . >%• ■:ir. ■tf--’k'V, U' i Review of Amended Survey • ri '■'i'Si-i Parcel A - Total lot area => 2.64 acres Area east of 15' drainage easement *X .5 acres Combined Parcels B and C Total area « .58 acres .52 acres dry contiguous The revised survey confirms that each proposed building site meet or exceed the LR-IC lot standard. As already noted in the staff memo. Exhibit C, the properties have been assessed a total of two water units and lineal footage for sewer. Access to both building sites shall be via Navarre Lane. Applicant and future builder is advised that because both proposed building sites are the recipient of major amounts of fill from the recently approved land alteration, that applicant must provide soil testing information with each building permit for residential construction. mm--mmm m ■• J ifi iTT -niA j-CTM iTt«i m IT Jr ~ II f.-tOai ■ i^,is3iLA.tikaiA '.T ’—-'T Zoning Memo #1729 May 11, 1992 Page 2 'The approval of this subdivision formerly recognizes the independence of the two parcels from Mr. Rood's homestead property to the immediate east and will have an impact in the review of variance Application #1731 Staff Recommendation •U W • To approve the subdivision application of a residential lot line ^'rearrangement as proposed by Clair Rood for the property located at 3280 Navarre Lane based on the findings that each lot meets or exceeds the standards of the LR-IC Zoning District, each lot shall achieve access from an approved public road and that each of the properties has been assessed a water unit and sewer assessment. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Kliii Applicant shall apply for the legal combination of Parcels B and C upon the approval of the subdivision application by the Council. 2. aa M'-av. The application shall not be scheduled before the City Council until subdivision/survey has been drafted in a form acceptable to the City and as shown in staff's sketch (Exhibit B). Please note the survey must also include legal description for all three parcels and signature lines for all persons with an interest in the property, the Mayor, City Clerk and a date line for the approval of the application by the Council. The survey must be signed by all property owners with an interest before the City's Mayor and Clerk can execute. '■-h . 3. Sic Upon application for a building permit for Parcel A or combined Parcels B and C. The applicant shall make payment to the City as follows: f* 'fi $225.00 sewer unit fee and a SAC fee payment (current '92 fee at $700.00) Provide soil testing information for proposed construction.i A «<««> :1 . ^ i •..'i t» .. ' •■'i . ■ j,. - nr ■*1.To: ^_ •V ,v>^^:^eViV0 Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse^ City Administrator im r. r- 'IP From: Date: Subject Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator April 16, 1992 m j- ■ri' #1729 Clair Rood, 3280 Navarre Lane - Residential Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Public Hearing mm Zoning District: LR-IC, Lakeshore Residential requiring 1/2 acre in area '!vr“4 Pertinent Ordinances 1.Section 11.03, Definition 65 (A) - Subdivision application is required as lot line realignment involves properties that will not meet requirements of the Zoning Chapter. City will also ask for Drainage and Utility Easements along shared lot lines of new building site. Section 11.03, Definition 66 (A) - Subdivision shall be classified as Class I subdivision. It can be permitted via a metes and bounds description described by a registered land surveyor. Section 10.25 - Standards for LR-IC Zoning District requixing one-half acre in area. ■V>«* . M; • . V Proposed Building Site Required ** .5 acre or 21,780 s.f. Proposed « .5 acre (3,320 s.f. wet area) Area Variance = 3,320 s.f. or .15 acre Remainder of Lot 56 Required = .5 or 21,780 s.f. Proposed = 20,425 s.f. dry contiguous area Variance “ 1,355 s.f. or .06 acre Section 10.55, Subdivision 15 (A) (2) - For property served by municipal sanitary sewer, the minimum lot area may be divided by flood fringe lands provided at least one-half acre of land not within the protected area is included in one contiguous parce1 and both municipalsewer and legal access is available to that building site without encroachment on the protected area. lajiatK ■: ; 1 - '4 n ■rri. J 1 1 i-J , 0 I ^, •>! s#. cS' ■ Zoning Pile #1729 April 16, 1992 Page 2 ■ ■ 1' ^ ■^ir ■•■'.' ■-!• V List: of Bxhibitis A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Survey of Lot Line Rearrangement E - Resolution #2989 F - Conservation and Flowage Easement (wetland 931.5' 15' drainage easement to south of property) G - Council Minutes 7/22/91 H - Rood Letter 7/15/91 I - Sewer "As-builts" J - Sketch of Properties Owned by Rood K - Staff Sketch-Impact Proposed Subdivision and Description of Lot Line Rearrangement mr Mr. Rood proposes a lot line rearrangement that would take additional lands from Lot 56 to be combined with Lots 54 and 55 that must meet the 1/2 acre dry contiguous minimum lot area. As survey notes, the lot is shown at .5 acres. Section 10.55, Subdivision 15 (A) (2) requires a minimum 1/2 acre of dry contiguous area for each building envelope. The approximate 3,320 s.f. of wetland area has not been considered. Applicant has option to either realign lot line along the north or east side to acquire the additional dry area. Lots 54 and 55 have each been assessed a half water unit. As a result the City will require no additional fees for the connection to municipal water, merely the connection permit and meter fee. Lots 54, 55 and 56 have all paid lateral sewer charges. The only fee to be paid against the sewer is a $225.00 unit fee with the building permit. As with the connection to municipal water, the connection to municipal sewer will require a connection permit and payment of SAC currently at $700.00.A- Review of Application #1604 i/.inHY T K.'. A *• ' r ■ - v-r: Review Exhibits D, G, H and J. Some members will remember their participation in the review of Application #1604 that involved a conditional use permit and variance review for the installation of a retention pond and retaining walls at approximately a 3 1/2' height running 100+ lineal feet at the northwest and southwest corners cf the property. During that review, pillars that were currently under construction at approximate 5' height were required to be altered so that a 3 1/2* height would be maintained. Much of the proposed improvements have yet to be completed because of our winter that arrived at the end of October. The City has on file a Developer's Agreement and Letter of Credit to ensure that required land alterations will be completed if applicant is unable to complete within reasonable timeline. ! ’''r. •7? =; ii ■i ■■ r; A :M'-m mMmm wm mm m.tm iii ii® m .M 4 ■i >:i«i IBPEii • C' iS :rt^vA Lrmm mm tt;i ■'- ''"M m iV K----- mm-:& U. L ■ '■•■ i# /■ ^1 . ‘ • -^» >Vi ^4: Zoning File #1729 April 16, 1992 Page 3 One of the recommended conditions of approval was that the properties would all be legally combined as it was the staff opinion that the alterations involved all four parcels owned by Mr. Rood and that the pillars being constructed on Lots 54, 55 and 56 and Rood's homestead parcel were accessory structures and needed the credit of the residence on the homestead parcel. It was also noted that there may be difficulties in the filing of the Conservation and Flowage Easement over the protected wetland area if the properties were not to be legally combined at that point. As the Council minutes note. Exhibit G, Council did not require the legal combination based on the finding that if the pillars were to meet 3 1/2' height, there would not be an encroachment and therefore not considered an accessory structure based on the intent of the code. In staff's review of the current files, it is not clear whether the Conservation and Flowage Easement was ever filed in its original fo^^mat. Based on the final resolve of this subdivision, the City will ask that Mr. Rood be required to work with staff to complete the appropriate amendment of the Conservation and Flowage Easement so that documents can be filed against the Chain of Title of the properties. The original resolution approving variances and condtional use permit was not filed against the Chain of Title because it was torrens property. In light of a recent problem involving torrens property and a lot line rearrangement that the City was asked to help resolve, applicant will be responsible for preparing the appropriate Certificates of Title and deeds for the newly created parcels so that both the subdivision resolution and the Conservation and Flowage Easement can be filed against these properties. Impact of Proposed Subdivision on Total Properties Review Exhibits H and K. Mr. Rood’s letter provides his plan for the comprehensive development of his property. Rood proposes the development of Lots 54 and 55 as one building site and the remaining parcel. Lot 56, as a future building site. Based on staff's approximations of the areas as already noted, the proposed lot line rearrangement must be adjusted to provide additional dry land area to Lots 54 and 55 to compensate for the wetlands within the building envelope. The dry contiguous parcel of Lot 56 to the immediate east of the proposed building site does not appear to contain 1/2 acre dry contiguous area. The area has been approximated at 21,700 s.f. and with the exclusion of the 15' wide drainage area at approximately 1,275 s.f. results in 20,425 s.f. of dry contiguous area. The applicant would have to apply for a lot area variance to build on the property. . /'L * ..i?'4 4a -3 .i A i ■I iTTir Iiriliririiiii . ■ -' t* ^ ..-V ■ »”V- ‘ " 'V^.‘ r*t.'-' Zoning Pile #1729 April 16, 1992 Page 4 t ^ .11 /••• It is recommended that the applicant at this time have a surveyor confirm the dry buildable envelope of the remaining contiguous property within Lot 56. If the surveyor provides this certification in area, applicant need not combine remaining Lot 56 with his homestead parcel. As currently proposed, the City must reguire the legal combination with Rood's homestead parcel. The applicant should also consider the impact of the separation of Lot 56 from the homestead parcel. If Lot 56 is to be developed as a building site, the homestead parcel will lose control over the majority of the now shared improvements. Staff strongly recommends that Mr. Rood consider the impact of current subdivision and his comprehensive plan for the development of this property. Rood may be well advised to alter this application to a two or three lot plat. Options Available to Applicant hi.'Mr. Rood has the following options concerning the proposed lot line rearrangement subdivision application: 1.Proceed with the current mSjIrs and bounds lot line m • .A ^ ^ ^ W ):}iwm :r“- •,/PS-:-'Vciv-B— Wif rearrangement and amend the current alignment so that there is 1/2 acre dry buildable land within the proposed building site. ife:-:. feii ;• If applicant provides confirmation that remaining Lot 56 has 1/2 acre of dry contiguous land to the immediate east of the proposed building site, applicant need not legally combine with homestead parcel. Based on the facts currently presented for the City's review, remaining parcel 56 would have to be combinad with Rood's homestead. OR To refile a Class II subdivision of a replat of two or three lots with the inclusion of the homestead parcel. Platting of this property will also simplify the problems with filing the Conservation and Flowage Easement required in Application #1604. Staff Recoomendatioii if?-'- staff would recommend that the subdivision application be tabled until applicant has determined how he wishes to proceed with the comprehensive development of the properry and to provide the City with the necessary information to complete that subdivision. Any condition of approval will require that applicant prepare the appropriate Certificates of Title and deeds SO thst th6 rsquirod documentation can be filed against the Chain of Titles of the properties. mm.rvmf’". TTV’' m-5*^*if ■■6, Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Date Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusthr Building & Zoning Administrator May 12, 1992 #1731 Clair Rood, 3280 Navarre Lane - Variance - Public Hearing ertinent Ordinances - Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (C) - 3 1/2' high fences/walls are l-’vf 9 * nonencroachments within any yard area. (Review Exhibit G.) M Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (E) - 6' high fences/walls allowed in rear yards of properties. (Review Exhibit G.) :'v?i Section 10.03, Subdivison 15 (F) - 6' high fences/walls allowed within side yards. (Review Exhibit G.) ■ 'i. Section 10.03, Subdivision 16 - Traffic Visibility - Plantings and structures limited to 3' height within 30’ protection zone (Review Exhibit E). Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 - LR-lC District required setbacks: Front/street = 30' Rear « 30' Side -= 10' Side/street “ 15* Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - setback from wetland: Required ■* 26' wm Applicant seeks height variance for pillars (fencing) installed in proposed front and side street yards of two future building sites (Review Exhibit I), Front Allowed 3 1/2' Proposed 4 1/2' Variance = 1 or 33.3% Side HIMefecrrs Allowed “ 6' per Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (F). During the preliminary discussions with staff in the preparation of the land alteration application, applicant sought advice as to an allowed height for a wall like structure. Based on the property owned by applicant (Review Exhibit H), staff advised that it iiii Sil:I iiiBt I t J ■•aJ ■rv*.' rm Ti •» • ■f isli Zoning Memo #1731 JF May 12, 1992 If Page 2 •* •*■i^Ki: would appear a 6' high fence would be allowed in the side and rear yard, since the code did not distinguish between side and rear yards adjacent to a street. Applicant did not provide a survey of the property at that time nor a plan locating the proposed fencing. Allowed » 3 1/2' per Planning Commission's interpretation of ordinance 6/91. Based on staff memos and minutes of meeting, it is not clear what Planning Commission based their opinion. I?. List of Exhibits - A - Application A 1 - Applicant's Addendum B - Plat Map - Property Owner's List - Pillar/Hedge Fencing Elevation - Landscape Plan - Council Minutes 7/22/91 “ Section 10.03, Subd. 15 (C), (D), (E) and (F) - Yard Designations for Property as One Building Site - Yard Designations of Properties as Three Independent Units C D E F G H I Description of Request fri: During the review of Application #1604, the applicant was given the opportunity to file an add on variance application. The applicant seeks a variance to the allowed height for a pillar or monument to be spaced every 20' between sections of natural planting. Based on the Planning Commission's preliminary interpretation at their June, 1991, meeting, yard areas adjacent to streets were allowed only a 3 1/2' high fence. Staff's preliminary discussions with applicant were based on the comprehensive land holdings of the owner. Rood did not advise of the eventual separation of the properties into three separate residential units. The variance application must relate to the newly defined residential lot lines. Review Exhibit I. Description of Hardship ■■-1 TJ Please review applicant ’s addendum Exhibit A-1. Staff would add that the unimproved right-of-way (Hillside Place) shown at a 25' width would never meet the required width for development of a public or private road and that based on current zoning, the roadway will only serve a maximum of two residential units. mm mm 1 V '•‘4^ .. r . •♦ ;*’ r . '#■ . . '.'■‘I ■.•>■■ Zoning File #1731 May 12, 1992 Page 3 Options of Action To approve as proposed or To approve 4 1/2' high pillars in side yard and to require 3 1/2* high pillars in front/street yard or ^ If the height variance within front and side yards for the prbposed fencing is denied, applicant must reduce height of structures by 1' maintaining a 3 1/2' height. These alterations must be completed no later than _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Staff must ask that all pillars and hedges be immediately altered and maintained at no greater height than 3' within the traffic , visibility triangle as shown on Exhibit E at the intersection of -^viNavarre Lane and the 25' unimproved right-of-way. t l <‘v c -V. R;-, 1 t'tlS ia :■ • • V. ■m rhdd 6"/^ u- • >/'7a/ ' CITY OF ORONO - VftRIANCB APPLICATION Hh^H- “ ($50^0 O^per^acradaLioMl variance) ““rchI^gt “"m"rriginai°appUcat^ ^ppUcation fee_,________ i 77 n 7 tjt.-r illr property ihpormation Site Address A/Ai/.^/Z/ft' 9 Prooerty Identif. Number (P.I.D.)- -^- --- - --- - - - Attach legal doacriptlon to application il not Pat. sip»t*? wn^a^iSiSi —-r"?!*.. I (do) KISS’ °'S. PC^iesraen^ial othe;(specify)Present use of proper-^:__^residenti ------- Zoning District »*• "■. • Zoning_Disrrirti_^ca^^f_________--------------------------------- Phone f h nme) ^ 7/““<7*77 applicant ^ rs. Name *phone (wor)c) ,, oust dtCK ST/} ^ ^0%/\/9 ^1,^------------llL/ar ~ ^ OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) Phone (work)_____ City:_________ _____2 ip: description op request ------------------------- . ^ 4. eEstimated Construction Cost ---------------- Describe request in detail: lAvuaf«.^-----^/yr< ^ >•— ; ‘-ti •VC >« « •f>- la '' '•1- i-VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area II Setback: Lot Width _ Front Side Hardcover _2^ Rear _ Lot Coverage Average liSkeshore Other (specify) m HARDSHIP/DBSCRIPTION op UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS . 4.4/~s>i ^i-?f£icultv and unusUal propert Describe ““due _h_ard_ship_^_oj^ p«^c requirements:---------- r '’V- (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIBED SUBMITTALS All of the followincr information must be submitted by the application deadl<"e date •»" order for your application to be considered conplete; 1. 2. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center • 348-3271). 3. _^Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8Jj"xll" for 5. reproduction). _Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any chamges in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll"). 6. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll"). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. __^Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included.r.l APPLICAHT'S SIGNATDRB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date ONNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorises reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date -A' ^ ] Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Coomission and Council* If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. • s V'-. ^ • ■ ’ ■ -linr I- pf#;-4 / CLAIR T. RCX)D / 2215 KENWOOD WAY / WAYZATA, MN 55391 / 471-8548 May 11, 1992 !^'To The City of Orono - - !K:;.Aa@r3^ I am requesting a variance for my brick pillars along Hillside Place. It was originally indicated to me to be my backyard and that to build brick piers 6' high would be acceptable. However it has since been decided that perhaps some time in the future Hillside Place may become an alleyway. Hillside Place is currently a 25' wide right-of-way. The reason I am asking for the variance along Hillside Place is as follows: .y.1 S^. I wish to plant a hedge or arborvitae trees between the brick pillars. If the pillars are 3h ft. high and the hedge is 6 ft. high, this would not be aesthetically pleasing. il:' By having brick pillars the same height or higher than a hedge would give the hedge a much more balanced appearance. My understanding is that there is no variance required to plant trees, shrubs or a hedge along that property line to a height of 6 feet. I am also planning to build a new house on the southwest corner of my property. Directly across from the future alleyway there currently are junk cars# motor homes# debris everywhere# plus the rental house usually has 9 cars parked there each day. I would very much like to block out from my site this unsightly^ area so as to maintain my own property value# with the intention of having every angle as much as possible# aesthetically acceptable & ■ .. mmalm■£ilP'V I am an:'ious to complete and make these improvements which would be of benefit to all and not a hindrance to anyone. Not only is there a time and cost factor which I am prepared to make, but I am at a loss to do so until I receive the necessary go-aheads. Thanking you for your consideration. 9*\y cjL..A ^ Clair T. Rood a ■ r ^t. •;,; e '. - -wv..• n^.-.. .X 1 B O . * • <»■ —-*--------------------------- 1. O. . 59 0 'V>‘J) I ii ' " H O "3 3: no m XI m > » ^ \ -< ^ > ^ m Z O o » > Ho Z ^ 30 • m r- M r* r* o ui •sj > > O 03 <N> > M Ul in o o .: .M' '> m mtJ) 4^ s *5 H > in in OB KM P“ >o < M O H i > \ ■< > m o 30 o 9 Kj n ^ X ro m m 2 < ^ m r* si S) n s§ O XI o m “o 30 > z o > C3 2 » m n Xm •<m O KM KM OB ro in M i I r* M r- > «*g > I X > IM o -< m n H O H ^ m o X o M >x> O M Q m n H 5&« *1 *5fI? ■- I— M r- r* o w O <sj > X> O OB ^ o -n ^ o c5 >0 3> ^ •< OB M r- Z m m vj 5 ^ Mm > m m > H» x« tJ -4 3 3 X-X-o I 2 M M X rvB X O’O.m KM S2|g m m (/> so i/> inM inV>4 in <n i in in i^ sO H l>i ro in >•n >•<m •H Hm X M o Qm o H o o > < -n►H O g •n M Oo (/) p* cn c« p* (A 5 CO XMCO X M oo o Q t". O KM KM 0) ro in M ■>4 IM |— M > -nI-Tl I > ro -< w m •H JN H m o X o M sO c? ro Q m O -I H O X z > :: X > X z o 3 X m X m > X \ -< > > m z o 6 X > o D 3 X X m z > < N > H > inin KM sO M V4 ro M in >•n $ m o Xm •< m m 3 X M Oa o m sMcn p* f“ g gS m o o° o H Om in in O KM KM OB r-> l-i# in M •o IM r* M > •%! m I > ro < w m •H ^ Hm o X o M OB O OB Q m n H ;x w c. > ro O -< ro X N in X H r- H > > ^ p* 3 5mS *< OB m m in m m U4 X c. ^ M o r- o > m X in 5S COM M OB po ro ro X in M •sJ r- I > M X r- M in > M O "n I 3 > fo •< KM m H-H ^ m o X o M 0> O ^ O m n-i 51 H > in inM M U4ro GBin n > 5 m XM o in tn > > -< < c c o o > > OB 00 m m o M M O ro OB in M >4 I M r* M > -g •n I > ro -< KM m iJi:m o X o M so O O O m o H H O X 3 > Z 2 > X o 3 X m X m > X V -c _)» m z C3 o X > o O 3 X X m ‘‘•U z > > X 3 X m > \ -<> m O X o X m X 2 m X XoX > a o X 5 •<N > H > inin M vO M >-• X X vO O >-* O CD O M) m z X > W H X m o co > Z X i-l X r- H X ^28 M o m -n M H O W U4 OB ro ro O M I M Z M < V> ro X M m r- > o o in OB •< N > H > 2 ro ro o o 00 > -< <M m Z C3 O > > r* r- m m 3 > Hino in in KM > sO o M m X H r* > tn Z m Hi> r* O M ro 03 roo O M -nI I M CD M 5V < ro M M m X r- o o OB ro Z M n > po r- -< I-* > r?>- 2 o O r- o -< in Z 5 in >M -c o M X 8 now O OB H O/ w X CD M 8 V O > M P# C3 -vl -O I X ro k m w a in. :a‘U 88^ C3 >tn in M 52 ptI O oincr ro ro O f- N in w > X O O ro •H ro w QB in M I> 8 -»-52 ^ M OO *n ^ Z in > w < sOM o X _ ^ 8^0 o -< o in Hz > y» X 3 X m > \ •< > m o X o X O X ^ om X X > z oO 3 X m O ro o o X -Vi 3 Z ro c c > ro > >• -<0^0 0 >!T-§ •<iS§3m Z in X in r- KM > sO O M m o w O OB o w OB M I M > M a -Ni C3 I s c. X ro O’W Xs Z X' m X m ^ n 5- r* in M in M m o o o x^ OB .•% ID >»» O X o o o ni m o KM \ W O N sD ro Xm Xo X X o 5 m • X M M X^ <,0 W O M fp.rr'^ O-Q ■ ..0 •.! ’ •• '" / ■ ft • ••*'•;■ t I , ' * • ■ * ■ - * *.• • •* • t .» -;‘Vv‘V • ■;•■*.: « •■.t •* . , • -4 • : ’ * • ft • • '-~T»<yTtr"»T.rv- ^<) ~y w* J « « ■ Iv v ■ I ' . H O -o z > 5 ^ > X 2 o 3 *T3 m *uJL U »M m > » \ •< _ >> m z o o » > c*o 9 Z )> > X 3 -O m > \ -c m O 70 O » o -o 2 om -□ »' z 5 §sm >r- X w "o > »-* m -< vn H N NO ni i> 9 05 > ri X o o oo o O' iM > >-n 55-m m H r- H M 01 m oi U4 70 sO M•-- o o m > 70 a a: m -O O CD 04 rvj' »• M OI m n4» M On „ I M M I- r- M r- > -n4 m -n I X > ro < ui m m o X o M O O ON Qm m X 5 -< Si Oi >-« -< Ol OI H > 07 05 >» X D* 5 c/> o a^ w rv> :r: Ol 01 04 NO M > T1 > -<m -i •Hm X M a om > -n X -n m X ni m o m 3 o > X Z >•Z 01 Ol M ON Xo M r- M > *>4 ■ri I > ro -< 04m "i ^H 04mo X o M Osom / •/ j {<■ *'■ ‘r^J X> X 3 X m > \ X > m o X o X o 5 m X X Xo X > >oo X xoin > M ->i C. H» -< N > H >> 3 -n 55°m o :15 Ol m 01 04 NO M P- > X X M no® 04 rs> C. M O M Ms r r- M ^ r- M X > *n4 X f 0» > r<» < 04m H 04 H 04 C3 Qm 2 2 Xo > X m o X o M O O 04om Xo 3 Oi M M S ^ 2 ^ m H r- Q > t5 > > -< m ® H m -H > m o 3 X Ma5S X X 8 > m X DC >="r* X 1> T| c > r 2fT| X m X Ol 04 On M Xo e ® 04 |N» M ON •nJ M On I M r* M > >J X I> rs> -< 04 m H 04 H 04 m o X o M o o ^ Q m X Cl 3 04 ® )-f l-» «H On m m rS H n 3 X X M > 3 ® o ® 04 fS> »* M On O 04 M I M M 01 01 04 On Xo M O O 01om Xo H Oillm > X > m 3 o X a X X Xo X >oo X 'V, X 3 IM Ci. C. > rv>-< ov-r>‘ ofv-o o;o > _ H C O 04 ro ® fa On o M -fs® y m •Nj - 5:^-5 i 5 ^ ^ ' M 04m Xr* o |Mo 04 n ,2 X Xo •< Xm X m X^t. 01 X r4 Ol r* 04 n4> X m Q ^15m X X O) 3 Xr- o 5i H 1-4 m H s ■y m tn X1 1 fi 52® X o i2 > ro c ®m X M jE < 04 3 rn > X > .m1 ■01 X X z X S 04 04 M IT n4> X X3amOM Oz o _X o s 2,T# ■ • iTi:^ ,.# «D- ^\\v k } \I >• t 59-« > m 2 O o ;o F o?o 25^1^ m > \ -< > m o 9 o :» P m 7? TJ ;oo-o 2 5 Fn > oo PO w,mmiiciil H O "O > X 2 O 2 *0 m TJ m > »\ -< >> m 2 o o ;o > o o 2 » » m -•rj H O T3 > S ^ 2 o T>2 *o m m > 3J _ o :o o o 2 ;o JO m -c N > H > U4 O' U1 c. c. aj x; o J3 -<c/> H > o o •n T1 » aj > I U1 CO Kn > w < M JO O m H © W CM © Ul 01 M I M n M » >1 •» H U4 > o -< o M 70 © O U4 U4 O' vO 5 K H O >5 5i5 > X O T3 X > r- -O 2 > > CO 2 O U Ul © Ul vO M i/1 CD in > Ul -< vO M aJ o p* X > o > 2 5 M O M aj VI H Ul >r- ^ ts> o -< o M » vj O Wr> m oo JO H O X §T3 m >» T3 PO O TJ > O O X \ZL\# H O *0 > X 2 O 2 T3 m TJ m > X\ •< _ s>!■ m 2 O o X > CJ O 2 X X m CD J- -Hn X S o ? o 5m X Ul55 po •< M ^4 O > H 2 > > < z >2 X X m m o © r- © > M © > m X X m O m M m © r- o X ► X X m 2 O XM Ul © ro M O M v4 I M I?J> X Ul X ^ m 4> M r*► o o fv> vJ O Ul o N. fs» ■-i .-• ■• ’-•^> • r -rTT^, ' r.--7 . !>■'• •'•1 r;» w ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 22, 1991 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORTi K\ . ^7 ♦ •I, ^v.(#5)ZONING FILE fl604-CLAIR ROOD VARIANCE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-RESOLUTION #2989 Clair Rood was present. Betnhardson provided a brief statement explaining the basis for Mr Rood’s application, noting that the Planning Commission h!d reco^ended 'Approval. He informed Council th^ Pla""ing Commission also recommended that ^ . the existinq pillars on his property to 31; feet, or that he apply for a seoarate height Variance. Bernhardson added that another issue for Council's consideration involves the legal combination of the parcels owned by Mr. Rood. Gaffron explained that the pillars, retaining walls and consti?u;ran accessory use and are located on lots that have no principal structure. Goetten indicated that, in her opinion, the requiring a principal structure with an accessory structu oe^tains more to structures such as docks, barns, garages, etc. She did not see the need to require a lot combination in Mr. Rood's case. ^ Jabbour agreed with Goetten that a lot combination is not necessary. Mr. Rood stated that at some point in the future, he ^^ovld like to build a house on lots 54 and 55, but that he is not y prepared to submit a subdivision application. owned by the applicant. All voted aye. Mctio.* poosev^. (#6) ZONING FILE #1646**TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH I' 2060 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-RESOLUTION #2990 Trinity Jerry Jones, an authorized representative for Trinity Lutheran Church was present. construction of a detached garage. He informed Council that t Planning Commission had recommended approval. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution #2990. granting a Conditional Use Permit for the - 6 - iV' 4^ ■ . j ■ '-k,^V' m ■< 'O j WM 4» § 10.03 EXCEPTION, Regardless of lot area, every developed lot shall be allowed at least 1,500 square feet of lot coverage by principal residence and garage structures. D. Tennis courts, pools and paddocks or arenas, when such accessory structures exceed 1,000 s.f. footprint area, shall be subject to the following special setback restrictions: Front “ 30' minimum and not within the required front yard nor between the front lot line and the principal structure on the property Side - 30' minimum and not within the required side yard area Rear — 30' minimum and not within the required rear yard area Source: Ordinance 72, 2nd Series Adopted: 8-14-89 Subd. 15. Non-Encroachments. The following shall not be considered to be encroachments on yard requirements: * *r . .. • ,t t A. Chimneys, flues, belt courses, leaders, sills, pilasters, lintels, ornamental features,^ mechanical devices, cornices, eaves, gutters and the like, provided rhey do not exten more than 1-1/2 feet, off-street parking except as hereinafter regulated. , ., ^ .B. Name plate signs for one family dwellings? lights for illuminating parking areas, loading areas or safety and security purposes, provided the direct source of l^^ht is not visible from the public right-of-way or adjacent residential property may be^located to within five feet of the front lot line. yj C. Fences which do not exceed 3-1/2 feet in height, fences not over 6 feet in heigh^ along the street lot line of lake frontage lots which front i *jor thoroughfare, if fill is required, the total combinea of both fence and fill snail not exceed 6 feet above the height of the crown of the road, terraces, steps, uncovered porches, stoops or similar structures, which do not extend above the height of the ground floor level or the principal building and extend to a distance of not less than 2 feet from any lot line. j D. In side or rear yards only, bays not to exceed a depth of 2 feet nor to contain an area of more than 20 square feet, fire escapes not to exceed a width of 3 feet, fences and walls to exceed a height of 6 feet aoove original grade and open off- scree t parking except for lakeshore lots, no fenc3 or wall oyer 4^ inches but not in excess of 72 inches in height above original grade may be located closer to the shoreline than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots, such fences shall not be constructed within 75 feet of the shoreline. „ ^ ^ ^Source: Ordinance 9, 2nd Series Adopted:1-28-85 ORONO CC 256-1 (4-1-84) r- - r. (S- ■- tj 4 S 10.03 > ' - V. • ; • E. Rear yard only? balconies, breezeways, detached outdoor picnic shelters and recreationnl equipment except as regulated hereinafter? no accessory structure shall be closer than 5 feet from a rear lot line nor shall a fence or wall constructed within a rear yard exceed a height of 6 feet above original grade. F. Side yards only? no accessory structure shall be closer than 10 feet from any side lot line nor shall a fence or wall constructed within a side yard exceed a height of 6 feet above original grade. Source: Ordinance 9, 2nd Series Adopted: 1-28-85 M^ A. Subd. 16. Traffic Visibility. No fences, structures or triangular area defined as follows: "Beginning at the intersection of the projected curb lines of two intersecting streets, thence thirty feet along one curb line thence diagonally to a point thirty feet from the point of beginning on the other curb line, thence to the point of beginning. y.Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 ■^{>x Subd. 17. Essential Services. This Zoning Chapter shall require a permit for all structures including utility poles, and right**of-ways which are an integral part of a system for public transportation, as for transmitting power, water, heat, conmunica- tions, gas or sewage by any public utility. The Council shall grant a conditional use permit only after a showing that the public safety, health and welfare will not be harmed by the essential services. is Subd. 18. Farming. 1975 shall be permitted to followina conditions: All farms in existence on January 1, continue operation subject to the A. No new "stock farms" shall be created or existing stock farms en.Mrged more than twenty-five percent (25%J over the total number of animals that existed on the farm as of January 1, 1975 with animals over one year old except under tne provisions of a conditional use permit. In considering any such permit, the maximum number and type of animals to be kept shall be determined by the Council. The site design and method of operation shall bo reviewed and the Council shall find that the propose or existing "stock farm" will not in its opinion be detrimental to the public safety and the general welfare. ORONO CC 257 (4-^l-84) ': ■■ ■ ... .V I•^1^. •9Vr '■> '!! ‘ *T '^r-r\ * ’ rF:?hf& * ■'f ’■• I, •, ■. f To; ‘•:-vsr Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator fslife- .From: Date: Subjects Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator May 13, 1992 #1733 Camp Teko, 645 Tonkawa Road Variance ~ Public Hearing - Conditional Use Permit/ Pertinent Ordinances ■''JbBS€Lm Section 10.03, Subdivision 19. Proposed land alterations involve earth movements in excess of 100 cubic yards. Section 10.55, Subdivision 8. Maintenance of drainage improvements involve land alterations within the 0-75' lakeshore protected area where no alterations are allowed. til List of Exhibits - A - Engineer's Report 5/8/92 B - Application C - Plat Map D - Anthony J. Gleekel's Letter 5/6/92 E - Property Owners List P - Drainage Plan Plus Addendum G - Survey H - Cross Section - Drainage Ditch I - Cross Section Rip Rap Spillway Description of Request Fa. The applicant proposes maintenance alterations of an existing drainage way and vehicular gravel path that provides access to the lakeshore. The maintenance improvements involve the installation of four spillways and a rip rap drainage ditch. The City Engineer has contacted the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to determine if a permit review would be required. The applicant has already submitted the necessary information for the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board to determine if a permit will be necessary. Staff has also submitted the application information to Ceil Strauss of the DNR who has been asked to also determine if a permit review will be necessary. The DNR will then advise if the Corps of Engineers will require a permit. Staff should be able to confirm by our meeting date whether these agencies will require formal permit review by the applicant. Erosion is severe within the drainage area. The adjacent gravel vehicular path is also eroding away wherever the trail abuts the drainage area. The final sections of the trail and drainage ditch are located within the 0-75' setback area. If the path is to provide safe access to the lakeshore for vehicles that transport handicapped persons and for the pedestrian users, drainage improvements are JimM r. i I®*;. I'. /mi :*v Zoning File #1733 May 13, 1992 Page 2 necessary and, hopefully, will be installed before the camp opens the summer season. Please review Exhibit A, the City Engineer s report reviews the project, methods proposed by applicant's contractor and, finally, makes recommendation to insure the success of the drainage improvements. Hardship Statement 1. Steeped topographies. Severe erosion problems.2. 3.Original drainage improvements are inadequate to deal with the watershed and heavy velocities of runoff. 4.Need to maintain safe level of access for the public who use the camp facilities. Rec ■V#) M • H lendation ■ *' Any recommendation of approval must include the following conditions: Remove PVC culvert and save sections to install at ditch block and pathway that crosses ditch leading to steps at west bank. Class III rip rap at an average si/.e of 9" must be used. Filter fabric must be non-woven fabric per Mn/DOT Spec. 3733, Type IV. r:'.. Minimal slope with fabric and rip rap required is 3 to 1 slope. Trail must be either removed or bank to west must be altered. If applicant is to attempt to save oak trees, retaining walls must be constructed. If the applicant is to maintain 3 to 1 slopes and also maintain the vehicular trail to lakeside, certain large oak trees may have to be removed. Applicant must decide which option is to be followed and to provide detailed grading plan if sections of the bank are to be significantly altered. Rip rap drainage ways should be extended all the way to the water's edge (929.4 elevation). ■« S3l i, r>rm ‘0/ mi PSE ,V^.v' if I Bonestroo MLM Rosene •55 Anderlik& ^1 Associates Engineers & Architects Ofto G. Bonwwxx PE Robert W toiene. PE * Joseph C Andcrt*. PE Marvm L. Sorvaii. PE. Richard E Turner. PE Oenn R Coo*l PE Thomas E No^i PE Robert G ScnunchL PE Susan M. Ebedm. C PA. •Seniof ConsuHant Howard A SantorU PE Ktfitn A Gordoa P5. Rooert R PWterte. PE. Richard W Foster. PE. David O ijoskota PE Roocn C Russek. aja Jerry A. Boudon. P£. Mark A Hanson. PE Mchad T Raucmanrt PE. TM K. F«W. PE Thomas R AnOenon. A i A Donald C Bu/gsfOL PE Thomas E Angui PE. Gary F. Rylandcr. PE Ismael Mamncz- PE Mchae P Rau. PE Agnes M. Ring. AiC P Thomas W Peterson. PE Michael C Lynch. PE James R Mivmd. PE Jerry 0 Permch PE Kenrseth P Anderson. PE Mark R RbRs. PE Mark A Seip. PE Cary W Monert. PE Daniel J. Edgertca PE PhUp i Casv^. PE Mark O VMaka PE. Miles a Jensen, PE. L Ph«p Gravel ML PE. ICaren L W«emefi. PE. F Todd Foster. PE. Keen R vapa PE Shawn D Gusahca PE Ceclio Okvief. PE. Charles A Enckson Leo M Pavi^y Harlan M Olson James F Engetsardt A V May 8, 1992 .. •• •. »■ .1 p : 5| fc.-. ■ Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth BuDding & Zoning Administrator City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 19'ii - - * Re: Camp Teko Property Conditional Use Permit Appl. #1733 Our File No. 139-1733 Dear Jeanne: We have reviewed the application and supporting documents submitted for a conditional use permit on the Camp Teko property. There are several significant engineering issues related to the constructability of the improvements. Directly to the north of the existing steps and proposed start of the nprap is a ditch block. The ditch block directs the runoff into a PVC culvert which outlets m the ditc approximately 200 feet to the south, the culvert exists with little or no cover and will create a problem when constructing the proposed ditch. Also, the pathway leading from the mam trail to the existing steps crosses the ditch at grade and is in poor condition. T^e existing culvert should be removed and a portion should be salvaged to be reinstalled at the proposed ditch grade. The culvert could be used at the ditch block and at the pathway. TOs wav the pathwav could be buUt up above the ditch bottom and impriwed with gravel. The proposed Class II riprap may not be suitable for the high velocities expected along the ditch bottom. Also, the 6" average size is too easily displaced by the numer^ pedestnans in the area. We recommend Class III riprap which has a 9" average size, m filter fabnc should be a non-woven fabric in accordance with Mn/DOT specification 3733, type 1 . The area identified as the last 120 feet of drainage ditch is of the greatest concern. The main trail and ditch are confined in a very small corridor between a large oak tree, a picnic canopy and the steep bank to the west. If this trail is to be used for any purpose other than pedestrian traffic, it should be widened, realigned, and improved. It appears as though it iT presently used for vehicle access to the lake. The steep bank to the approximate slope of 1:1 (horizontal to vertical). The minimum acceptable slope, with fabnc and riprap, b 3:1. To construct this slope, the trail must be removed, or the bank must be excavated significantly, resulting in the loss of several of the large oak trees m the area. ■ Jij iii (>■•- ■ - ' r-y^-ci> •.,_• ar --^ ^ ' Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth City of Orono Page 2 May 8, 1992 il We would recommend that a retaining wall be constructed along the steep bank to save the oak trees and to provide a wider corridor for the ditch and trail. The riprap should be extended all the way down to the water ’s edge, as the lake is presently at or near the Ordinary Normal High Water Level (ONHWL). We have been infomied by the Nflinnehaha Creek Watershed that a permit may be necessary ■ to construct the improvements below the 100-year High Water Level of the lake. The Minnesota Department of Natural Reserves and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers should ■i also be contacted for their comments on the improvements. Please contact me at this office if you ha> e any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLTiC & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson SDG:lk ■f' a" • ;r If:- ^tl << w -vV ‘k. w ; f t '.it f'A • -r ^ • -. w f 'if-:,V V>.M ’•X' V ^-v-' *' r V.'v. ,V' ■.1 ■f ■; ' "'.V V \ ■'• V •Wi . H ' wm .1 Pv ' ‘ ■ v"•rf,; mh:m ‘ -wU.'. i-»?/...CITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND DSE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 645 Tonkawa Road 1 >7 OQ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 0511723330001 i 1 I Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. __ APPLICANT Name Phone (home) 377-6029 Canp Teko Address 645 Tonkawa Road Phone (work) 339-7131 OiTcno zip f.'!- a (if different than applicant) Name Tenple Israel___________ Phone (home) 377-6029 Phone 339-7131_____ Address 2424 Hnerson Avenue S.City MdIs.Zip 55402. Date Property Acquired 1965 (?) -- - - - - - -- - (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. .V T.' 'Ik’A •. V- .-J fees - CONDITIONAL DSE PERMITS - $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration •4 ■■ nrrv nc nunyaiWA I I *jt Cm\WITU/rriL-Ykh\A,rc ncrTrcI xnntnx^u Ut t i 7WIV/W 1 W*W‘VC. WWV* ”sVVJi tri-i TL 17P '■ i I w'iw* . V 175..CHECK EECEIPT^HM YOU Grading and filling - designated wetland or^ZfOidddjyi'i&ii fj* Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more X (?) Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule Renewal Pee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _ Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule $300.00 $300.00 ^ jtfi klir PRESENT USB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify)_Ccnis. I detail = of drainage way and I grade to Lake Minnetonka REQUIRED SUBMITTALSssiraa,.fe.:- 2.this’list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governmen Center 348-3171). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed land Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). A3 an addendiSi to this application, Please any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17" OR SMALLER) POR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMItT^.______ The” aoDlicant and Property Owner must sign this application. rLember that your application is not complete if the above information not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. DHXI0Initials of Clerical Staff: "fs'^Icant^I^by agrees to provide all revlL ol "is Ipplilation, and certifies that the information supplied is true and co^'*ect to the best of his/her knowledge. jj , Applicant's Biqn3t\ireC,'iy^^^Yr^l i 1 ^ rk a x'nowledges S?y“s\\ff? c\ntu?ta"^^^^^^ third Monday of each month. Applicants must be review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If «" *PP “®*"^ “ unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make no s zonlna^horired agent attend in your place and advise the Building » Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. iVr-* > • TW ^ r = : : 2 :\ - K 1 'V m --- ..“'v. * LAW orncKS SIEGEL, BRILL, GREUPNER S DUFFY, P.A. rORMCRLY GROSSMAN. KARLINS. SICGCL S BRILL RICHARD 81CGCL J08IAH C. BRILL. JR. JAMCS R. GRLURNCR GCRALO 3. ourrY WOOD R rOSTKR. JR. Thomas m. Goodman K. CRAIG WIlOiI’ANG JOHN S. WATSON WM. CHRISTORHCR PCNWKLL SUSAN M. VOIGT 1300 WASHINGTON SQUARE lOO WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55AOI TCLC^HONC I«I2* 339-7131 telecopier 16121 339-6591 ANTHONY j, GlEEKEU SHERRI L. ROhl E JOEL H uENSEN BRIAN E. WSISBERO ROSEMARY TUOHY ANNE K WEINI-IAROT* JORDAN M LEWIS RETIRED M L GROSSMAN SHELDON D KARLINS May 6,1992 *ALS0 AOHITTEO in CALirORNIA iK : . 15605AG Ms. Jean Mabusth CITY OF ORONO Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 » V,.; Re: Temple Israel - Camp Teko Conditional Use Permit Application Dear Ms. Mabusth; Due to the need to complete the work requested in Camp Teko’s Conditional Use Permit application, I hereby request that this matter be placed on the City Council’s agenda tor May 26,1992. If you have any questions please contact me at the number listed above. Very tmly yours. feAp'- te’s'A^ wmM AJG/ss Anthony J. Gle^el ^ »ru • ‘ - r •.V 1 ;j - . \ ‘ MAY * • • • 0 ' A. /■il” '^^SPKV ■ ♦ V hi .jM .■ r 1 le r >4* « *«fc- "I'. •» • ' 52'" ggv'^ S 3! S " S S “:J i'--:->J.r :'■ S S « O 5 . :.:r-X,4 M n S 9B >1# » S, :,;S-5«a ° r- - a S ••ii"^ ■'-‘ t'-^.V. V- ' * > ■*>?* Jf *t'V V’, -r^' 2 • > c*> ■«• ui •» o V>i' - ‘ < Z, Vi■ * V _ CJ k s!lii “ ‘"Sr?-*'' o d _ ♦ 2gi**' T M -. “- • R * X a? . M 5 ■ f r- ■ • ;r^' . *■ ■ >•* • f- f»l ffl .Q W|ss»rS-°S Q M b O o O H m m o in m > N N H M 2 M M Q W 4*> r- > a o r- o ♦i • .■^■ • r"' . i*, ■••■' •'*■ •’' Ti. ' ^ , • •#>« V- fr w <- o w O CP f . .•V? s ;:rr- *:. *.i • IJ ^ V », *» f- Ih 2 X O W o M o 0»Z O O (P O XH > 09 O Om » in f- p» I a M in > c/) r- M ( INI %i O 0* > Wl °5°®a M X »> a o 09 O X » H» p» rv} CP o r- 0^ CP C0 p g §~li .«• : > 'x:. fif>o ’-'i ■* » ■ • • :• s • ;r ijit i> O 01 CP P>r - P O I. w« • ... V ' fp 6 E E ^^ S r- O' o o o ^ O •'J ni m o 09Z O O O O'» 2 ^ H O Cl o o mm in '"Inngt: X o o z I *xSS|C5o m m Xf- f- > w WM 7»CP o om o H 'O O Oi <h m r- r- H M m m Q m m Z I r» § 3 V X m rr» P . ui ^ M M M ii|?m m X i\> f- f- m w UI ^ o Q i!) w■n *n > > Q o S wf- f- M M (P CP r- N <- t. o M Q in o 0 9 r^ 3 m ^ ^ S m >X r- m g ^ i^25i^gw Cw r- 9 m -P p g o m S ^— •"*» I «■ m o Hiss'" .. -• •*.' »» •. ^ 5 H > 5 o 9 CP _ 2 r- X r>> r- o CP — CP » m in o o in ______ I UI 5 2 W ;S M^ m m Q *'4in H» o > » Z Iin in m r* < ^ n*^ 'O -P _ ^ ^i/f H m n X ^ (P m «> M4 I H IVIP > n »M H O o o\r> m » oQ 9 on in O V H H p MC 2 CP m IP m ^ M M M > IPm o P"P m 8aa®§ II s M M CP CP <* v » •xV'"'‘'•55.1^:^:. ■ f??. ■ v>. ■rU-'-.‘--.. “I. • d 1 t ..... ». .•.■•Wr -u., .■ ------------------ '•»■;■*■ - .,^..1 I;. . I ‘\ -'V '*■•■' {, -. ., v; .nv • .' •_■ A v-->*‘>-‘ -t ' ••■' *• '<: v'..^ .^;>- • ■ V...... ^ - ■•^‘, •» - - ^ 9 z > 2> X .'Ti ■> .7\vV- s ■ .. ..V rn P9 ': ^ ;• JH* .: S, -<' - *'*^' «. •#' )> fti 2 o ' o 30 > o * •' ’. *. .' - -i - O 2 39 . .k. -. 39 W |ii • / s 5 j» 2 z 2 '• •' •'•■ ' 2 3* ‘ -*39 m . ^ m > » ii®'"• ^ S g g OC.C.J4 -:, >*V--. .s .. ^ * '»•< ^ •» . .4..i . .j*. A -. i . i V- A $1! o ■>'A'viv E£'Kfx 4Ir-"'■■' ‘; m •* I |v -..■V-. . • '”*"•* ■■ Ir •■' - ’A:• - • ♦•* '• » -•*5..'>,?- c=A--/• '."• ■ *• A'i • ■ ;■'■% O O 30 M -n -ji m _n n5H»m. . •* •■ •::-»i..,. «• '. • •* ■ : *V»t •. •• ■ •«. X* * f «■ >-*. I •* • . • ‘ • • ^ ; • •.*■■'' . . • ' I '. * • *. '• ■ -♦•'r'-AA'AA'Arr- '• •:' ■':^. %'' rr ' . ••'■ , igS? gssls* H o n ^ o r* d ui>2^-0 I ^ ^ M M M m 3 r- N4 X X o w VI m rn o 0»i°is^Q 3 9 ui V) (/) H HI X X Q -M m fti 2 > » » ^ ISi -4 -< -< O O r- Q 01 > 2 ^ ^ *X 3 Mm > CO CD H M m nn Q *»4 3r!, fO u A *'* ggggw in > w m ^inm-I X 01 U4 3^ 0 0 V4 vno>f- 0 0 g ■V V >- 't .,. .,«- .*> : i"* t • .» . ■ V • .- • • 1 ««>■. Vi .1 ■ #Am f A V .! ••=. ‘ .1 ^ »_.5BS # --' r -*»4l*#r- ‘ •■■ - •■*•• - .- .-*. . ; ,.■ r ;, V-.i : .. .^, Vr-t . *^.. vJ#^*..VAV,v*.v r. ••♦■■•••vj -. • • \ „-v; iv' ' 9 '0- ‘ ,;^.-j •■-v-*2 ; . Vs y. . * ••- •.^»j '• '#.« •»«*? *. . ' Va:,- :'.n , “• t.^-4 i f- Ni O O O W Q O^ X X O 01 2 O > > *^1 X X O^•H r- r* o o Q m m 01 . - i^ . . « ■ .A - - # .- -• :•■* ' A* M. } ^ 2 S ^ ^ xxx»^m 4 $ r* > > o M Q ^ r- f o Oi i°55|o Sisi"•525j5zz X . .*; •• ••'V'' * • <' ^ - -., . •^,r> V.11* . *4*. j -V „ • k V-« ii 11 .*' . . ■ ■> A ^ : »,*• » - '• -H ■ •■ 9 s 2 ISI 3 r* • .^•t.«'• ' i'.’^ ■ rv:i^ ... •A ■••-«. <% -~,-:-V‘ '-4 -*#•.■ ;>-.; 4. • •-.- jr■.•%'•■.,**-»5%'*-^ : , * fT’t* *.«, :• , ,»■»•■■■* ■‘•T- V»« * W»< . • »; U*‘-' ; '■.■ ^ ■ “>: • V,' • ^ *1..! »**J •fA! A* ,. ■'■ ■■ • i*.''. ;■; •Mv-'i.-l'^ A. f -f.-.V.-^ . : l.V^ .,. >1 A#*. - • * *•■,.. '- -Jffc.;-; * t r • .,..... .u"' ...i, ^. ■ ., - .• , .......... .. ^ • V- y«.. «t ». • . . i'. * * • '•*' ( ••*'* • ■r ,.•»!* r#/^. 4. *• > *>y -yr"'“:' *«»»'■ *’■??,«*.-•* * r^, .gg*^‘*<"•»■•**•.. .V-^ r~ -!♦ V< * * '•’ ■ « •*• * ■/• .• •.'*' ''/•■ ■•., . •■ ». --f ' - - • - » . ,*••.. *■ .•.. * • • ,- • • « • ••*■• • • • .■*■ ',. >•-■ ■: , .-fc,.*.»». ...ISni ■•• .* #». •7., %..'r'<*. ?■■'.■*... » • '-<(» A..kA^^-. ■ i ’■• - ■'■. rZ- -Vr . ■ ■■ i Xl;«b «T-.'lr^>' ♦ 4- • A.te.**’Ti■<!£•«' 9^X«r«>9r«t^' **7 '4m3| *• • >* -gB • •• »*,*©*j|r i»ii'. -• .*v VS'; m • A M :.. 7 , , . .*« •. MT < • V . • .• - ♦^ •. . - « ■r4». ■ • • ^ V . *^t " ■ ‘ *•*■• -• »*•“ ' ' « *..’.• ^4 «S . .4 • •■■ :t»» .■.' 10* ■-• -«"■ '.•^44 «> .# . . • A^^' '" a.4^ ‘ ,.• a '. ".• •'••“.••*•" A * — • * *— .A «w.» . ..^ : M* ,. ' '• II •*•««- ■*»< 4>- ■" •' •• ■ ' r ■'•.'• A • '■•*■. A ‘ .•"*'■■ ■ ‘ ' .' f.- *’ • * . ' : * ^ .3! ♦ .. 4.^ »►.. ;. % J-..'^'-> •/».* *.’4» ". iii(K ■ ■. - • •4-' Vfv-^ ..-■.•• -r *>M • ' .*•■• »■* V , ’..^r A. -.■4. ^ «r t • rib4» k; •». ■'t- - ■a. ; . 4. 1* ,.;*^# •.■* :- :r" ■ muiwtx* <*mi Hifci-y*- «f ' ■»• !U.«iyyy wifc *>i. •. ^-Vr— <MicWki 44 • -.»4K«« «. .. •• • . -• 1.- •kt- -■.4' • l>i «4 • : . I 4 *.<4. .-li-W- . ••• * ■— •. - ■ - • ^ »«• *»4»- — 4» fw> HiT» - #»* • ■** ’A •tM*/ . r ■ •. ; # II itifrgif iftirtltfMil ■f V toanatit :) j fcy,D J O ^• ? ». - ;;/- ■ :s:■^ - ^ a:W< -"r" X C&zsLe- f.M. FMTTHOHt aMVMING i 6RM1N6 3066 Spruce Street ST PAUL, MN 55117 (612) 484 0448 SHEET NO (;/U.CULATEO BV. CHECKED BY---- SCALE M/l-±k^ i i J.____.4 , 1 1 r\ r' j -. .C „]---\ Prfrv — ^ i : i i • ‘ : i i.^ ♦ ^ i—i 4-^ •■t I. -i——' - \ I" ' - ’ ’ ' *Pat Wua V 4—T 4-^4'* •__--j— •T r-4-1 ___ ^ . i. i.r - v.> - • *•■-4 • 4.r .. i -+—-t --4' I- ._..-i..-4 _ - -4' I i 44 4 ^ ■• •;■ 4-i -t '4 ' ■•!'-" *4.— "*4 - V" ••' ..^ \ , .. '■Ur-n- ••• «• t *"' 4.' •. *, 4- ,4^ ^ ------- f* ••■ I V *.*4.«-**« -t' I 4 , ■/ 0 i--: ,..4--;k. - \ - ^ t •*•T ' t" 4 I 4 -4 -^ - t -4. — \—i—t"'"r - f’1 • f • ,.4:4- I ■+ 44-4'"^— ► 4—• -f i 1 ^4- ,-44-4- i--V 4-- 1 ■1 -'1 T ■ f r 1' B r n' -,' * ?«■Ca/^/o TbKO EM. FRAHALONE EXCAVATING A GRADING 3066 Spruce Street ST. PAUL, MN 55117 (612) 484-0448 SHEET NQ 2- /LA^4/za hz. Ki/^._ R/i/“,Sft //uiAy 0B7~Ai L - - t— I J— -1 *1-------- Tle^o ! ? T ■.......r -«c--------------------V/W/7I7ff/\------------L. J0[ pP-C^Ccss J27T <i*•• r 4 -------f-- *-t-------t L...0t4Ay t'».......... —- i •f- '■■ ---- -i , .. ^ . • *—»*■ «r« ^ # — • • ^VI fi* K>o. i . "T*.:r -•- i ; ir - ir 1 h 1 — \ . i i ...i! ; V i ••[ t-...t....i-'-t...4 'i—{■ 4.. .—+------ .... h*'' ■ Cl 1~'1...T t f.? R ap .i----------- ........ f ........•.■ -1 — eift, /•J__ ••• -f-- .... f.a-4 —^— i—I— r¥ r •i- i-- r --------— -4 —- t'-'t -- t t-** ... --t -i----- i- •r....- _j —.. . . *.. ... .-4 ---- j----------V/fitj Side i .. . .. . , I ... ->.- V, -.. . IM-. •»■ >w. ..»»• .. ♦.>«» • ••' -4- Pi .-.-4- _.i -4 T-+H r -r --1- +— ,ij t ! ....r -----------1....... ^ - 4- - ••*• -i. ... 4 ——-.f - |... t- -------.:M •t . 1 I -•- nOQUEf »«>! 9mN Ml 1 (fiM MmaIU/I liteM»TSUf«ll8»2a4lil w ■, . x?f- A f;;* f ■ '*•■At Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator May 13, 1992 Subject: #1736 Gregory C. Peterson, 1920 Shoreline Drive - Renewal Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IA, Single Family Lakeshore residential, unsewered, 2 acre minimum requirement mm Pertinent Ordinance ~ Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B). Request for rv ^ renewal of lot width variance granted in 1989 and 1990. '¥M Required » 200' at the 50' front street setback line Existing * 30' Variance = 170' or 85% List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List , D - Survey E - Resolution #2829mm "Description of Request The original owners of 1920 Shoreline Drive, Ronald and Julia Prineas. have sold the property to the applicant, Gregory C. Peterson. The applicant has applied for a renewal lot width variance and proposes no change from the original application. Applicc.nt plans to build or. the undeveloped lot within the next year. The conditions of the approval resolution. Exhibit E, included no other variances to required LR-IA standards, a specific location for the approved building envelope on the property, and no variance to hardcover requirements. The lot was approved for access via a separate driveway to County Road 15. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the second renewal lot with variance application for Gregory C. Peterson per the findings and conditions outlined within Resolution #2829, Exhibit E. -f- ■ > i iK:i *'t » ' -r' ''» 'w. CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION t0^i'Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional varian Renewal Variance Fee $'*00.00 jjj (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) e 3^ PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address mo W ■rk- I r.■V-. CITY OF ORDY^O FI nAiiCE OFf" 1S50200000 01 QEH KM CHECK TL 100,(K} RECEIP/-THAHK YOU J1240290 cool ROi ril:(04/24/: Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) H^CX)iig Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date ^ooerty Acquired KJoO. _ _ _(month/year) I (do)^o nS^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. ^ ^ other (specify) Hcvccxar^Present use of property: Zoning District: 'I CkCjOv'^\oi:^^ APPLICANT Name CJ Phone (home) ~~ 1_ _ _ Phone (wor3^) K^Sl pr-Address: \ .City Zip; ) OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address:City:zip: DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ mm ■* ■' VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area y Lot Width Setback:T-Front Side Hardcover___Lot Coverage Rear _ Average Lakeshore 1 Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Iflii Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements ;^ Q.. ,3 A ^1..^ ^ , mi K'A7^ \y\% \f V-rvwCj([______^ > V A7^i4(o 1 T ‘W .c •" St. V t (attach additional sheets if necessary) SBQOISED SUBMITTALS All of the following* information must be submitted by^the application V?-. date in order for vonr application to be considered completej^ 1. JCompleted Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). ©_ _^Plat Map (obtained with property owners list).irxciu nap wx uaa 4. y/ Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy S^s^xll" for reproduction). 5. ^ Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8Ji"xll"). 6. _^Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll”). 7. V As an addendum to this applicatioUf please attach a separate list of - any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. y Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application Is not complete if the abov^ jjnformatlon haa not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to th^best of his/her knowledge. Date ONHERS SIGNATURE Applicant's Signature Date / The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature <x.S Date Applicant must have all sutmittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ■i i < • •.V I • 11 4 i a "•5 ^ 4 •j ■ .. .1,A. * % ~‘- c - ■ -• . . . • • -•. * ■ . . i .. . ( , ( VI • ' '■ ' ' V ‘ r — tii- c:K. I V/'3?-_ ■• . • _ V, , »V _ ;* • •.■A'-. V■ v.v :; .• V,- •• . n •V r* H ^111 * -« j • - VV : ^ ■** »• It*, 4 k.; • ^ ^ #* ♦ tlM -5 •. 9 •W*>- ,/ ,* - *•* - m > » \ •< > > m z o o s > a S m * m > ;o \ > > m z o o s > a o z ;o ;o m • ^••• • • • -- -<*• -.*•» •- .... • •■. .<.»*. • • • ''te. ■« •* •-« *. - • a •V'pr.TV.' >— * ■»: :;..* •- •* ' » • v . * .>'4»4 4 *•■ * T V *%-. V .4 .' ». n».v . • '• • *»% - r- i* ■ - i- 7 ■':.. . ^ ’ , V'i )» - ' » > ;^v,.vv. ................................................. »• . ’ * '. -< o ;o ^A., g o g _ o t •*> •,; ; r\ r, ^ , i •*> / .i- ■s • * * Vv . - • T* ..»> • 4>*' ' . V' •... I.' ‘ . •>,'- - i 5 n-- ■»..-• •:• r 7*;^"r ♦ :. : r : ■' ^7 '^7 ■ ’ ■■•■\ .i A*’ • i.f .* ‘ m* . '• V v*"7 7 ^ - 7 * * • • •■V *' t ‘ .* Tr jl: . 5<»i;js®s X r- I °Sis5m M n 99 I M •»-. ► .«- i • > y. ♦ S S c- ? Uf Of M ^ W O f" > Z M -’la* ll 0o o r- » H» 01 Z M > > O Ul > r- M ®sis;* H W Z S ® O> X m «-# I Z S ^ r- jg M Z HI f- m X Ni f- m (/> o I M c/> » fv»z •» m u< ui n? •• r- > M kP o I«s5|s siS§»s vn \M o ^ X M ■ ,*y- -:•• .v=>:,7- ■ -..■ ' : li X o 4 * 4- . 4*'. S'^-v •■'*’■ • - • . • *'i * * ♦ V. 'i;,** CO 1^ .,. ... 5* "*• \* 4 *v;- • . . r• •* .. • *y • *\ • .*7.r '• - V <• • f. 7 ■■••■■: ■-V’ ‘V •% O O X O U4 H» Q» 3j H X m X m X fn</) Hm M ?5< vn o o ^ N o X X in ^ m m o M si§i 2 3 M K -< X M ^SonSr 01 > > > 01 O X 04 X O Z M o O O M > OI X 9 < 01 HI n 5!'"8-oSm H > 38 HI O X O 04 ^ ® o ^ 04 X (H O Mo rj 04 i8- W c 8;^ H- c u o o X X X o M 'O 01 0104 sO h* -1 r- I M HI 04 isK 045JO g o HI M ^’*■11? M •• r- > M .P fn X oo o X X X M mm 9 X X n MX X M . 5 > ■• HI 04 M &1 _ 3 “o a MOM 2•« » n » m 'I i M O > 09 O O -1X0 09 M vn -» m Mm ;. . •-: ■,-;1i y ‘ a • m V 4.>' 3 ?■r- Z M Z X o 04 > ^ O . 0 9 X X O Z M C. C. O 04 ^ 'O ^ ^ M 9 X N o X ^ 04 X M z 9 M H 9 09 m O > X f- I zS^8>!^ 2 m c. z o *s r- j> o I M o 0* X rsj Z O m 04 Oi m C (. 09 Oi m 09 ^ r* >M > ^ 09 09 O M mt 1 ■:■ ^siixcZ H r- f- m ^ ^ ^ ^ HI o o -4 04 SsiilS^« MM j‘.4 >■■' m ♦ ■ ■ '.V • S3 •I • - V. y....; ;, i«| r V-. * ‘1 7 V • • . ■- ■ • • ® ^ *4 7*X'. . .; ^ ^4 V * r. *.... -.»c -•» •-. .. F* ’*^7 7* . v^;r * ' . •■»•* .4^-— • V. .Jf,, *1 *, 4- *#7i » 4' . - L. >•.«»»..•*# 4 .• .1. . . . i . ... « ; >.^, -7,7*-.r7. . ., .. -.^4 - . .. --7*;- ^ .. 7- • - -i:-V r* f . • * V •. . ' J - ->V, r ;;* • *..• ■V ,.,7 •*• ‘^••4 •« 1«»•- •...... »i. ■ ,^'i • . ____ — ^. - ■________________________- -- ■ —.-____________ ._____ .. , k.'k& - ^. .«v4^ ______ ..^ 'p ____ .7 I ST c Otf(9l —2L«0 ^ UJ SS*" V 5 70 d *7‘.oi * Uk •' '* 4 (97)— rcn * .*30 I \l £ 0-^ k»- 1 » |0 Xi t?^30 M30 30 30 30 io »• . a-2: *>►5;^ ^ • O'.'fta ..••• ..•*'* xi r^.j 00 1 > 20 r;: t 'u & LI 'S -> S-S O ** ARBOR is 20 30 w 30 30 30 n4 A r CARSAACLUC 4 ASSOCXATU, THC. 1-3031 Land Sunr«yors Edan Pralria* m 55344 •> Certificate 0f ^urtiei’ Survay For_JnJ.ic_^£ijQg^4 Oool 1980 Hesrltnge l/riv« Orono .*•/ j"/ -J V« 1 ,-t irf ^Uhl :#■ 5cok I * 100 m ■y-d >yyr\ DETAIL i>coU / A ^ # /*/ / ‘ Tl'' ■. ^alUNe (\ 0< UHt -X ^ ---------------------------------------- 5fv.p^ 5ilt I I—iT -« I '•/V 7' « l|l J i "t,.'II..5D0 £r--T 2.0- at,R6: ^Svi’W liAt <rf Le*6 ■k i i= PciacriD^iont « Tract* A and D, R/^^isternd Land Survey Mo. 96, Pi lea of Registrar o£ Tit I**, County of Mofmopin, and that psrt of Let Six (6) lying Southwesterly of a line drawn across said lot psrallal to and 105 foot Northaaaterly from the Southweaterly line of saicl lot. Auditor's Subdlvisioti Number 356, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the map or plot thereof on file gnd of record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County, Hlnnesota. Together with nn eososNant for road purposes over the Hestorly 20 feet of Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision fhmiimt 356, Hennepin Ccunty, Minnesota. ‘V, ■m: of the bounderle’t of above doacrlbed property . . ';4'-m Hennepin County# Minnesota, and of the location of all buildings ttwreon, and all visible encroachments. If any, from or cwTinild landJ^^Surveyed by me tMs_2Zth__«J.>y of__Horch 19f2- I ] CAHR.%fir.LLG $. ASnOCTATr.*!, 1»C. by. ^ Plropcj (612) .911-3031 StotC! Itpg. No. C. <r<D FL c'* V V !, ■i i iSliifvii 11 r--r*» ; ;r« r. - -- • .- - ' • • i:I a. I ^”'TY 1 OF 1 ORONO City of OROrS RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCl NO. 2829__________ A RESOLUTION GRANTING A RENEWAL VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) PILE #1540 WHEREAS, Ronald and Julie Prineas (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1920 Shoreline Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: #1. *. t ,-^rr Per Exhibit "A", attached (hereinafter "the property") and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a renewal of variances granted in 1989 per Resolution #2650 to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a single family residence on a lot of defined^ width 30' where a defined lot width of 200' is normally required. iWm tOrono, Minnesota; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of * j*--. /.Si FINDINGS '■M- 1, This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1540. h}.^wm ■MiMi 2. The property is located in the LR-IA Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission originally reviewed this application #1410 on May 15, 1989, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings; mmm M' A) The lot area exceeds the minimum 2.0 dry buildable acre requirement. • ^ f B) A feasible building envelope exists in addition to primary and alternate drainfield sites which have been tested and approved for use. mmmm C) The hardship to the property lies in its extreme narrowness at the point where the defined lot width is measured. Furthermore, there is no adjacent land available for purchase that would inciease the defined lot width to the 200' minimum standard. ■imM Page 1 of 5 ilMi....,, ... It I ■ V { -■* >- •■ ■ “ ■W-*- ■ V■£r CITY , OF ORONO City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2829 _________ ^0-4. . 4. The Hennepin County Department of Public Works has verified that the County will approve a private driveway access onto County Road 15. 5. Although the property contains a feasible building site, that site is limited by narrowness of the lot and by the designated drainfield sites, hence careful site planning will be required in developing the property. Therefore, it is appropriate that a diagram of the building envelope and drainfield sites be filed with this resolution to make future potential buyers of the property aware of the site limitations. 6. The City Council originally granted this variance in 1989 per Resolution #2650 and finds no changes from the or"! ginal findings and conditions of that resolution. 7. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. y %. V?.jJ LV--: i!. . -ij-.; 8. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district? that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighbo-ing property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of ti.e City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Base«^ upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a renewal variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a single family residence on this lot of defined width 30’ .^here a 200’ defined lot width is normally required for construction of a single family residence, subject to the follov*im conditions; Page 2 of 5 •A ■vj ^ V ;■ .'i' V ■.x,' V j-ys f" _ i. » 'u*- • » »fe:';#:V'V.' ir> ■arv?’: irA City of OROINO CITY -w ■• fcii OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2829 __________ SfT*'" .. - :..V“ ^ •■ 1-y^r- - . .V j^'i' V f ^ J xf Any proposed residence must meet the required minimum setbacks established for the LR-IA zoning district, and must further meet the required setbacks from drainfield sites. 2. A diagram of the building envelope and approved drainfield" sites shall be attached to this resolution as Exhibit ”b", to advise future potential buyers of the property of the building site limitations. 3. Any proposed residence or development of the property shall meet the hardcover requirements of the LR-IA zoning district. 4. No other zoning variances for development of this property will be granted. 5. The approved access for the property is a single drive way at County Road 15. 6. The standard park fee shall be collected by the City at the time a building permit is issued. 7. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive on 1 y and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire cn that date (July 9, 1991). 8, Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 9. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of ,the property. Page 3 of 5 Vi I wwm ^ ¥'tv • I fi • •i’; • • CITY OF ORONO ■ t m ; ,' 5 City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2829__________ Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, ^Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 9th day of July, 1990 ■r >n> allin. City Clerk erty Owner(s) S^TE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY r.f HENNEPIN ) JiC3^ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 9th day of July, 1990, by James R. Grabek & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. THERESA L. NAAB t NOTARY PUBUC - MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY my convmMton «xp4rM 9-6-B2 Page 4 of 5 , *5 ♦ •#- disS^;a- r fe: r* •■ m ,.,.L CITY :0F ORONOi City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2329___________ STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE ) ss. On this day of -^1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, 199(b, county, personaiTy hown to me to be the before me a Notary Public within and ftor sa appeared Ronald James Prineas, joint owner. person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC notary public stater FLORIDAMY COWISSIOH EXP. AUG.31.rjS3 bonded thru GEKERAL ins . UNO. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE )ss. ) On this >-vr='~day of 199 L> , before me a Notary Public within and foV sai^County, personally appeared Julienne (Julie) Prineas, joint owner known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. £V-<. NOTARY PUBLIC NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA HY COMMISSION EXP. AUG.31.1993 BONOeO THRU GENERAL INS. UNO. rKSfiT . Wm Page 5 of 5 . i-r JUW i/j iSiM ■ *■ ; AJ^' f ^ ^ rMi- mmm ii;?.ril'?.:-:>'TiS>miM h-'S: Mm V . m-•■■• :t'al ■r.---:V..< :. • J. * » ^ ,' - V‘; ;-■ *521 iiiii / •■i. * j ■': Z a 11 z a 3 o c 3 n 3 3 a 0 c* a a p a *0 a Cj n p- a 3 3 P* u> a 3 m O 3 O' 0 ft c 3 t-n a rr 0 a M O 3 %Hv 3 n IT* a 2 0 P-IOp. 3j 0 P* y a H 3 3 n o M <T rr o 3* a ui ai ft > a a ~ ft n au cr z C3 0 0' II i-h ft P a ao 3 ffl o-H- ffl TJ o n ft M ft a c o 2 ^ O O II C ft X n fT'O ft 3 H* ®- ^ ^ ^ Q,a 0 a a a 3* ft‘< a •-< O' ^ 5, n y a 2 0 3 o vD I- 3 ‘< 3i a a 3 ft ^ w n ft a 3‘'ij 3 fi a a H (TOO w <3* in ft w o a a a 0 c O' c ft fT 3* 2 3- a: 0a: a • a aa ft vfl 2 a 3 a 1-3 O rr I* O a rr 0in H-' n ft a r' a cu a n ' i< (0 H- in M2 (_,t< nn M O ^ ^ ^ O rt» o M rr M !-n a rt> E 0 a a a 3 3 a 3 ft a o rr 3 3* I-* ffl O O -O 'O tn 3 3a a a tO a a >- H- n a a <J> ft h* 3 0 na n a Ml m f 3 3 ffl fT O Oc n ui 3 ' fT'O - *< H* ft a> ^ a ' o c rt* ^ 5a 2 >0P» H* ft c a rr 3 3* aa o 3 a H* rt a rt ft a • a a o a o o o «i rr m - flj' O »-• O 3 W O O ^ C ft C pi: i3M* O' 3- p. a-o M H- a K ® 13 «p* a. 0 3* a a f m 3 P- ^ Qi o a 2 s ~ o p* ft p*a cn ac •o* CL «i _ r^i£]a a p> fto 3 a ri c i g p* M» a 3^ n p* a 3 ft 3o a •o UJ UI O' 3 % •-■ •’ flixli. ■ — *•- •- rrr ca Q H-[b rr H*o :j •• gs tn = O H 0* to C H H 1-3 PIo > z zo to 00 KJ VO V r -I A .*> ! • j-rr ^ •• • * ,1 •V- sp^r- y.f mm^SM J-'^. ..:-'kM-" fix p?^ 1 * • ’.j fe' ‘ , ; , ’ • i \V*‘ • • •v-i£ '.' A Vx •^.'VV :'v.^':-V •■■■;;tSi /, . i .;!■ *■ : w ■ (/^ o•n F r C7 r c: r- O -&*n > C7 "11 mr* V r) ~p vn o :r 5 ^ 0 ^ 00 ^ ■ 0 no ODro VD T .' .-»'• « • • • * • • 7 •► • . iL*'’- ’■>;• ■ W-' . * w • • • .♦• •• * a »y» % 5 n r rorr C7 (A cQ I t7 ^4 f CP r fn 8 • . . t W •• - • 0 — ft)..:,— •.';iiiMhgn^iii^<^'h-iirii wm: RESOLUTION H2&29 ^ .1 «if- r.< STATE OF HIHHESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO ) ) ) ) ) I Dorothy H. Hallln. City Cleric of the City of Orono, Hennepin county Hinneeota, do hereby certify that I have conpared the foregoing copy of a reaolutlon of the City Council of the City of 0'‘0'jo with the original record of such resolution in the Minutes of the proceedlnga of aaid'City Council at a meeting Qjj July 9 I 19 90 . and that the saoe is a t. ue • ^ ^ w* > V and"'correct copy of said resolution was duly adopted by said City Council at said meeting. In Witness Whereof. I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 8th • , day of _ _ _ _ _August_ _ _ _;_ _ _ _ _ _. 192iL- - -• ’\yh\ML rilin. City Clerk 1.P (SEAL) , — A fcvi W« . • •/■it-.... 4» * • • :v^.‘y '*1 • ,t. Vi "//v/V‘,#‘--/:>S iVr i* ^ fii ilhMiiintfi* V* POPHAM, Haik , Schnodrich & K aufman , Ltd . 3300 PIPER JAFFRAY TOWER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 i'*• WAYNC a POPHAM RAYMOND A. HA(K ROOCR W. SCHNOBRICH OCNVCR KAUPMAN RO0CRT A. MINISH ROLFC A. WOROCN O. MARC WHITCHCAO BRUCC O. WILLIS O. ROBCRT JOHNSON GARY R. MACOMSCR ROSCRT 8. SURK HUOH V. PLUNKCTT. Ill FRCOCRICK C. BROWN THOMAS K. BCRO JAMCS B. ORUCK JCFPRCV S. MALPCRN BRUCC O- MALKCRSON JAMCS R. 5TCILCN JAMCS a LOCKHART ^ ALLCN W. MINOCRAKCR CLIFFORD M. GRCCNC O, WILLIAM KAUFMAN PAUL H TICT2 MICHACL O. FRCCMAN HOWARD SAM MYCRS, III LARRY O. CSPCL JANIC S. HAYCRON THOMAS J. BARRCTT JAMCS A. PAYNC DAVID A. JONC8 LCC C. SHCCHY ALAIN FRCCON LCSLIC OILLCTTC MICHACL T. NILAN THOMAS M. SIPKINS ROBCR*^ C. moiuancn THOMAS F. f'CLSON THOMAS J. RADIO DAVID L. HASHMALL kathlccn m. martin JOHN O. CHILDS DOUGLAS P. SCATON THOMAS C. SANNCR RICHARD A. KAPLAN BRUCC a McPHCCTCRS SCOTT C. RICHTCR PAUL J. LINSTROTH SCOTT A. SMITH BRIAN N. JOHNSON BRADLCY A. FULLCR DONALD M. LCWIS KCNNCTH ROSS- DAVID R. STRAND SCOTT K. GOLDSMITH GIRARD P. MILLER CLI2ABCTH A. THOMPSON kcith j. HALLCLANO MARK B. PCTCRSON TCLCPHONC 612 •333*<A0OO TCLCCOPICR 1331 6I2-33A-27I3 1321 612-33-4-2701 1311 612-334..2503 SUITC 2400 .200 SCVCNTCCNTH 9TRCCT 0':n VCR, COLORADO 00202 TCLCPHONC 303-a®3-i200 TCLCCOPICR 303-B03-2IB4 SUITC 300 SOUTH 1800 M STRECT, N. W WASHINGTON, D. C. 20038 telephone 202-820-5300 TCLCCOPICR 202-820-8310 DIRECT DIAL NUMBER 334-2549 TIMOTHY W. KUCK 0RUCE A. PCTCRSON RUTH A. MICKELSCN JANNA severance THOMAS C. MIELCNHAUSCN MICHAEL O. CHRISTENSON J. MICHAEL SCHWARTZ JEFFREY P CAIRNS ELLEN L. MAAS LCWIS J. ROTMAN TODD M. JOHNSON LOUIS P. SMITH BRUCC H. LITTLC MARK F PALMA RussruL a poncssa BRYAN L. CRAWFORD MATTHEW C. DAMON «;OHN W, PROVO JILL I. FRICOCRS PAUL 0. JONES WILLIAM D. HITTlCR ELLEN SUE PARKER GREGORY G. BROOKCR BRIAN W. OHM GREGORY G. SCOTT ROSANNC G. ZAIOCNWCBCR CCCILIA M. MICHEL ROBCRT C. CASTLC THCRCSC M. HANKCL JULIC FL5.MINO-WOLFC DEBORAH A- DYSON BCNSON K. WHITNEY KATHRYN M. WAuKCR GCORQC J. SOCHA SHANC R. KCLLCY MARK F. TEN CYCK DUANC R. NOCCKCR oec Rowc GARY P. OCNGCUn JOHN M, BAKER KAREN M. HANSCN SUCSAN PACC-SMAPIRO STEVEN M. PHILLIPS LINDA S. KRICONCR ANDREW D. PARKER JOY M. WALOERA PATRICIA A O LEARY KAREN R COLE OF COUNSEL FRED L. MORRISON JUDITH YOUNGER • AOMirrco IN CAuroi»«tA a «o Mittouai INCfJDINO THE FORMER LAW FIRM OF HAUPERN «. ORUCK August 24, 1990 D CITY OP ORCNO JildEsn^ii Mr. Mike Gaffron CITY OF ORONO P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 AUG 2 7 1990 Re: Torrens Certificate for Resolution No, 2825 Dear Mike: We have been informed by Metro Legal Services that the above-referenced resolution relates to Torrens property. In order to file this resolution, we will need the Torrens Certificate. Please contact the holder of the Certificate, as listed below, and have him bring the Certificate to our office. #2825/Ruce Cert. #740958 Steven J. Ruce 4625 West Branch Road Mound, MN 55364 (sent 3/28/90)It ' Original Resolution Nos. 2829/Prineas, 2830/Thompson, 2832/Prochnow, and 2843/Reed are being returned to you as they are variances and relate to Torrens property. Variances cannot be filed on Torrens property. .y Mi f ■ Resolutions sent for filing are: 2827/Calvin Presbyterian Church 2828/Filkins 2841/Stubbs ■3” # r Mr. Mike Gaffron August 24, 1990 Page 2 ft. -. V i ’ 4 i Please also note that Resolution No. 2842/Born (a ^ variance) is both abstract and Torrens property and as such is being filed on the abstract property only.V. ■’mmsb> r ; ■Sincerely, mmmm- I. • ;^ .=j {/ii.ryujy^ Carolyn X./Sommers Secretary Lo Nancy E. Husnik Legal Assistant 1100ZNEH(32) piii-ii ’rngmi/ ' :; ■• -- m |-/v d t 5, 41 “■»ll *4 ft' ’^■ Jik f^.’ - *■<?|c<-im Im r^-jfi-Ti ■■fr*nfii^-- ■‘ii wT Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator 9. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Rv;^| Date: Subject; May 14, 1992 #1737 Richard Hollander, 680 North Arm Drive - Variance - Public Hearing . I Pertinent Ordinance 1.Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (A). Lakeshore setback variance required for proposed decking and gazebo structure. Required « 75 ’ Proposed * 14' Variance “61' or 81% a " i-% 2. WWM Section 10.22, Subdivision 2. Average lakeshore setback variance required for installation of lakeshore deck and gazebo. Entire structure located in front of the average lakeshore setback line. Refer to Exhibit O. * ? Section 10.22, Subdivision 2. Hardcover variances within 0- 75' setback area and 75-250' setback area. ii:a) m 0-75' setback area = 15,000 s.f. Allowed = 0% Existing = 3,550 s.f. or 23.7% Proposed “ 4,285 s.f. or 28.6% Additional hardcover = 735 s.f, or 4,9% [area of wood decking and gazebo] 75-250' setback area Allowed “ 1,025 s.f. Existing « 1,986 s.f = 4,100 or 25% or 48.4% s.f. - Application - Plat Map - Property Owners List - 0-75' Hardcover Inventory - 75-250' Hardcover Inventory - Planning Commission Minutes 5/20/74 - Council Minutes 5/28/74 - Zoning Administrator's Memo 5/20/74 - Site Plan - 1982 Building Permit H(l-3) - Lakeside Elevations for 1982 Building Permit H(4) - West Elevation 1982 Building Permit H(5) - Building Inspector's Certification I - Building Permit Applicatxon 7/87 Storm Damage Repairs J - Building Permit for Storm Damage Repairs '9 m III aaimil ■ -- --- Zoning Memo #1737 May 14, 1992 Page 2 ii K(l-3) L(l-2) y, V .I?M N O 1987 Approved Repairs 1987 Unimproved Structural Repairs Not Covered or Shown in 1982 Building Permit Inspection Notice 6/4/91 Staff Letter 6/21/91 Survey ^hl>escrlpt:ion of Request > ■' * > x^■ In the back-to-back one hundred year storms of July, 1987, this property sustained major storm damage. The lakeside bank was undermined with the heavy rains and the rear decks on the property were washed down the hill. Applicant applied under the emergency storm damage ordinance, review Exhibits I, J and K(l-3). The approved repairs consisted of the rebuilding of the lakeshore bank with a boulder wall at the base and all structural repairs were to be done in accordance with the original permit irsued in 1982, Permit #4747, Exhibit G. Unfortunately, the storm damage damage repairs did not follow the guidelines set ^orth in the directions in the building permit. The original snown on Exhibit K-3 became an enclosed structure with the hot tub. Applicant claims that an original lakeside deck and gazebo were destroyed with the erosion and landslide from the storms. The City has no record of ever issuing permits tor lakeside deck or gazebo in lakeshore yard. The total structure consists of 735 s.f. or 4.9% hardcover added to a yard that has excessive hardcover. Review Exhibits F(l-4). In the 1974 variance review, the garage addition was approved with an add on deck to the lakeside. Based on the minutes, it appears a lakeside deck did not have to meet the 75' lakeshore setback. Note the existing screen house that is located in the lakeshore yard was not shown on the survey of 1974 as was the detached garage that was to be removed as a condition of that variance approval. Review Exhibits G through H. In 1982 the original decking on the lakeside of the house was enclosed. In 1982 Intensification of structures located within substandard setbacks or where excessive hardcover existed did not require variance approvals. The issue for this review is the after-the-fact variances for the decking and gazebo structure within the lakeshore yard installed sometime in 1987 with other storm damage repairs. ^ Wfcr- 1 Zoning Memo #1737 May 14, 1992 Page 3 j •v.y Issues for Consideration 1.Are ti.are existing hardcover improvements that can be removed in exchange for the 735 s.f. of decking and gazebo hardcover. Screenhouse and attached deck within lakeshore yard * 308 s.f. or 2% located within the 0-75’ setback area. 248 s.f. of gravel drive or 6% located within the 75- 250' setback area. Landscape areas underlaying with plastic 81 s.f. or .5% within the 0-75' lakeshore protected area and 258 s.f. or 6% within the 75-250' setback area. mi Options of Action Approval as proposed or Approval as amended requiring areas of existing hardcover improvements removed and establish a reasonable deadline date for the removal of the hardcover or Denial requiring the immediate removal of the wood decking and gazebo within the 0-75' setback area and once again establish the 2,required removal date. if M ,-i>. . t V’-r/ • .! ■?T'T 110/ CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCT APPLICATION O) w 35V:-^ I ■> Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200,00 After~the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) i if 1 PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address 680 North Arm Drive, Orono Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) 06-117-23-43-0002 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired 1972______________(month/year) CITY OF OROt^O F ih'ARC 1350200000 Fli^ME OFFICE nj ' Fti rUCrk‘ U I /Ukiv V} ?*v2v I i. v-c: ik«L.w* • VI (uo)(do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: x residential ____other(speciihF^IFT ’‘THnHK YOU Zoning District; LR-1B 4 » j ^ »I f i it I I i .‘V t I (r j. i J - APPLICANT Phone (home) 472-4353 Name Richard Hollander Phone (work) 827-4247 Address: 680 North Arm Drive City; Mound Zip: 55364 OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail; Approval of variance application for grand- fathered deck. _________________ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width X Hardcover Lot Coverage .* ■’* X Setback:Front Side Rear X A»50«#>})a( Lakeshore Other (specify) BARDSHIPA>BSCRIPTI0N of unusual property CONDITIONS ¥ Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual propert conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements;\ .... I wi 1 . .4 .-> €)i . W Vc^ •/ «.>•1 11 V -«g -o' j-t g -i ‘ ^ V '-u*. * * *• - « „ - ■•- 5C^2^* *^v... ' • '. V * ./*•.. ■. • . - .* . - .'I •.- . vT *P -*V.- 41 ■. V • »X - *,:i> ;,.. : i-''r’*--:'r4'.., '.’v'^,^ . .., .-V. >«•-,*• •• -‘J*’>!• —;*fr-•<•. » ■• , . * •" ■ ‘4. .>'V-*'- • •-4 •■**-• . -V •< Jttirt • * T « fc -. , - t * <'». V •« , /' • >». * >v • ‘ .>/■«- ^ #; • •^ *- ^ . i-r « / . -y 4.V %•.*;. * ?o> X 2 o » V- •• / •‘if .- y Vlt*’’-> -2 - • .•• :, -.i*- v.V'.'^ '* ^ ^ '- '^«:*^** • ’'^V* '■**-* * ■ . < » t :. .•.'■. ■“■ •■•■••■ -' • ■ r ■■'•'• ■•• V . •, •• ••.>.■, .• wv^iv-,. •: ^;:V, ■ . .. • •%-»- «a ' ^ f *• • •• • . * ♦ ^**' ‘*. - ■ ■ • •.'jX • •■••*' ji. • ■ • -'». • :V . n ■ » •./ 4 . HV’*' ' ‘•rr '•' •' ■ . '•'=^ ' • o o s M -n Ti rri TP n r-. > •*f Vjt.v , K I OD ea^ • it. '' * •' ^ -0 m nj X 2 o T> m -o > ;a V -< > > m z oO 73 > O O Z 9 33 m m > 33 \ < > / > m 2 o' O 33 > os S* C3>HO X - #• V ^ ■ oo M o nl vi o o o m o X X O OB o m m -»4 - o o o X < - X X X I U1 X > > H In X X X X M m m o X < < in om M Mo m m I M $s issi? si in f- r- H fsB in r* ti Ti X U4 o o•n -n o o o X o w U4 M > > o o o X o sS ^ C C o M rs> O OB O (/)(/) -‘j M m c. c. o M in r* m o Ob o M ^ O W *n X in 2 P- r- o oO rn m O'2 X m m I 2 H o o M*=*= = gtj > 0* §• X I in X H M in X < < X iH w(T* o m m ► X 1^ r- n X > ► o M M a o cn in X ^ r- r- m m m m n o X X X W X r- 2 n m o > X X XI in X Q X p» H rs> in 3E Q > ^ X w IM X C ^o O o > ^ X m X oo o X oM I 3 M X X O ^ ^ M M o Ob r- o o r> (/) X X OB 3» > O O X X X X 9^ 2 g O O I i®"!?in t- X X X I in O O O H fv* ^ -1 r- r- X w llii«mm o C/> X X r3 o X o oosin oUi XM X ftl X m X :3 X M in X r- Q M X (A X•"S -i •'ift..I £5s? X .9 M in i„•■• i«-. * ♦» « 4, •U . *> •• .* ' ■■» '*K. f ■ ' f.hiu------------ ‘**^*«'**>"^*^*-‘^ —^Tfkw i>li 't-V \ .. . ♦ HARDCOVER .CALCULATION WORKSHEET . ScTBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) (jQ-75^ 75-2/C/ Existing Hardcover in Zone */^l ■,v: fi :^'4i 1 1 Iwn &■! ■It r:r-m. I mM m0rm A. ■ H ouse _•« ^ LENGTH WIDTH ' /S.J /2.3 B, Garage •» • !*• c. Driveway X _____'' fcpff-^soo-rf // • uyfjr r/p>f 0. Sidewalkr-v/y r/t^fu .n.ic 7z y C^AtL ^ X rT4/PS (u/f?r S /fip) 7,7 o.s 3. ^ E. Patio / ' Deck F. Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY .. ____________ PLASTIC sheeting ^£?CtC4f£ Uf,*LL ***) /2 O U£4T(£*^ALi: ' ■ -• X X X G. Other Total Hardcover *in Zone ':■ ! >Total Property Area in Zone • /slo S.F. t • • • S.F. S.F. /^P S.F . • •« • S.F. S.F. ^o3 S.F. '73 f S.F. /-LO “777 y4 S.F, S.F. sp •S.F. • •• • S.F. S^7 S.F. S.F. _ S.F. 3€0 3oo S.F. S.F. ^2 PS S.F, 47 9'S -LfT] /sooa X 100 - m':K r''l « •« /X s. p. B -« . .. • • . ■ • » • V* X'/> ‘ y*>':v^ wm. n . -ivT ■ M Vi, '■' ■ Wh'* \Mr -ilfi ► «T I?*’ -T 1- --TT'TTTI/W rf ’ !..•••• * HARDCOVER .CALCULATION WORKSH^ SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' Existing Hardcover in Zone House length 3. Garage • M « • a«|i» c. Driveway ^>/fl. x SlA<‘KTC/P X iii D.. Sidewalk _l A iv;- ? /IP •*' ^ < E. Patio/ )eck ' i-X F. Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN 3Y : , PLASTIC SHEETING 7^ -h G. Other ^ 250-- I o 3^0 WIDTH • • • • Z^S' ^75 S3 / € /25 ZO / 33 Total Hardcoveh in Zone /9S'^ Total Property A rea in Zone (2 0 S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F, S,F, S.F. S.F. S.F. /<T f S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. B 2f./(20 X 100 4^. ^ ■A. I P| * -■-•■ ' .. ■w >♦ / B % f.' :'------ ---- - •• V, - • A »• « • t A .y;3 iij 4)4] \< fi 1' 4<: I. , *'■ i^!cnofiUi£0 Minute* of tho ri»oular Plannina Cox^ilsulon Quoting, itonday, .lay 20. 12/4. • • #P- Page 4 to where the bust location might be for Tho lor lino. Kullberg moved, Curtis seconded, that o Public Hoarlng be sched uled for June 17, 1974. Ayes (0) Nays (0). i4r. Hollander, at tfe» present time, has a garago right oo the rood right-of-way, Mr. Mol lander has subm ttod plans to relocate a new oa?oge 22» from the North Arm The plan Indicates an Irregular shaped structure which ^Id In fringe on the 75' setback requirement from the lake. It that tS. ^r,g. 1, . dSck, th.n no vnr.onc. I. n.c.,«ry, but If It Is part of tne garage, a variance would have f° granted from that portion of the ordinance. VanNest twved, Kull berg seconded, that a variance be approved as It would bo on Im- provetaent In the existing conditions with the stipulation that no portion of the structure be located closer than 75 to lake and that the existing garage be removed within W days after the completion of the new garage. Ayes (0) Nays (0). The Zoning Administrator Informed the Planning Commission thay the Gagne project was placed on tho agenda as an informational lt«n and that no action should be taken until the comprehensive plan, or more specifically, the Plan Study Area for tho property Involved, Is completed. Chairman Vanl4est Informed the petition er that tho extension of the Hackberry sewer line had been de leted from tho present sewer project, and, therefore, tho only possibility for their proposal Is to run their sewage through The existing sewer line through Long Lake. The Zoning Adminis trator was Instructed to find out If capacity was available In ;he sewer line, and If so, how many uni Is could be handled on tho existing line. Hr. Nielson and Mr. Gagne suggested to the Plan ning CawsIssJon that they consider allowing approval of this project In stages so that they could get started as soon a> pos sible. Present plan* call for starting the residential portion of the projjict first which would Include npartments and townhouses across from the school complex. Curtis moved, Guthrie seconded, that this application be lobled until the Planning Commission can determine If sower Is availeble and until the comprehensive plan Is completed. Ayes (8) Nays (0). Hr. Straley was Informed that Orono Is In the .process of re-wrltlng Its B-2 portion of the ordinance relating to lakeshore-oommerclal activities. In addition, the L.M.C.O. has placed a moratorium on the issuance of multiple dock licenses, and, therefore, the City cannot process the application at this time. Ge-.xh moved, Guthrie seconded; to table the Straley application for a I4arlno License. (Ayes (8) Nays (0). /-/ •/ f ^ / bJ'V-' / RI chard \kiUsn(l9r~r Variance Ul 11 la.m Gagrni Shopping Cantor Stan Straley Marina License App! r.,v.- I vr I r‘' * I* i • -'Vi m ,:-v.r: •: /•» < :.m f- 3 THIS ITEM HAS BEEH MICROFIIMED TO : FAOH: DATE: Pldnoinj Co(nmlss>lon Oextor MjTjton, Zoniruj AdmInI strutor Mjy 20, 1974 SUBJECT; Vdfijnco PETITIONER: Richjrd Hoi lander LtX^ATION: 600 lUirln Arm Drivo STAFF REPORT: Mr. Hollendor has requootod a v.irlanco for the construction of a now garufjo locatod 22' from tho County rood ri'jht-of-woy at ono corner of thw structure. Tho ordinance requires a 35' sot*back from the road right-of-way. The petitioner plans on removinj jn existing garage which Is currently lo cated right on the property line and replacing ix with tho new garage. STAFF PE'CCI-f-'EllOATlON: A variance bo granted because of the following factors: I. The petitioner plans on removing the existing garage and constructing the now garage further away from tho road right-of-way. 2. Tho lot is narrow and Mr. Hollander cannot (nova the structure further from the road without infringing on the 75' lake setback requirement. This reconr'.ondation applies to the portion of tho structure which is 20*x25'. The petitioner has not defined what the additional area will be used for, and since it Infringes on the 75' set-back requirement, this will have to be defined before a variance could bo granted to that portion of tho structure. Approval for this variance should bo condltic>nod on Mr. Hollander removing the existing garage. , 'O'---'’ i-' f »*rSr 1 IliU i 4 teili Uimmrn0^ iWROFilMED tsi«.Tl+ uh<* ( r^4fH ■■44* plAH - l"-^‘ U^U^-rscTeg, t&rA06rAC^ >(• t (4 •r«> > V- M* F; «■ 4 - - ....- ■'^ I •« i; St -4 --.i ■ ■ V Fti:'7\’> •,- . ^ -r'r.,w . •,*■’> ■* » 1. , •<iu^ > .f . t ^ CITYofOROXO Building Permit -NO APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY PERMIT N? 47471?* • DATE ISSUED = 0. BOX 66, CRYSTAL BAY. MN 55323 473-735^ ZONING DISTRICT P IRE ZONE VAR. OATE CONO. USE OATE lot area WIDTH DEPTH PROPOSED SETBACKS FRONT R.SlOE REAR LSlOE lake , WETLANDS ACCcSS NEW EXISTING AGENCY APPROV. OATE ci"rY / COUNTY ^ STATE '' i-H. EASEMENT J . EXPIRE! BLOCK .SUBDIVISION (Addmtl m \ M M ^ M M K A m M ^ ^ —————— ARCHITECT/ENGINEEP - Must Certify Multi Femily. Commercial 4 Industrial Construction Plans (Firm)(Address)(Phone) BUILDER t (Firm) (AdOrew /'AitA l/^j^ ¥ 6 TYPE OF WORK ^.^^S^ion^ ^nernodel^ IAddm$}(Phono) Ranovate -3al/_y, '/7^ /)fKj CONST TVPE PI nr. si7F >* GST. CONST. VABLOG. SIZE « 3^ r :ONST. VALUATION ^7&Md RCSIOENTIALI STORIES B 80RMS/FLR NON PESIO SEPTIC APP. OATE OOCK PROPOSEOUSE STORIES COUNCIL APP DATE % PERMIT FEES BLDG. PERMIT 3/3. Oc STATE FEE PLAN REVIEW PENALTY PARK FEE SAC CHARGE /7/.60 TOTAL D REMARKS:Mu£t ^ qn^2/2£/^ Lj I INSPECTION REQUIRED footing baler* pour FRAMING rough-ln INSULATION (NALLBOARO Belor* Tapinq FINAL bate** oecuoancv fSKW BEVONO OR WtTMOUT A RE f ^ JL'IREO INSPECTION WILL BE SUB- ' CT TO penalty INSPECTION HOURS 473-73S7 CALLS • 17 A M INSP. I • 4 P.M 'ALL I • 4 P.M. INSP NEXT DAY WORK REQUIRING SEPARATE PERMITS PLUMBING MECHANICAL WELL ______ SEPTIC _____ SEWER_____ water CRAPING a FILLING ELECTRICAL i»o»n Si.va ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THE UNOERSIGNEO HEREBY REQUESTS PERMISSION TO MAKE THE REAL IMPROVEMENTS SPECIFIED, ANO DECLARES UNDER penalty OF LAW ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ANO ACCEPT* ANCE OF ALL INFORMATION. CONOITIONS ANO REQUIRE* MENTS represented on THIS DOCUMENT, THE UNOER SIGNEO FURTHER AGREES TO 00 ALL WORKS IN STRICT COM PLIANCE WITH ALU CrrY OF ORONO ORDINANCES ANO STATE OF MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS. Sianatur* r f-i - h- I p •.' .1 ■I 1 ji m a~ R 5 * , • _t •y' %.r ' ^i ' . - T . • *I • r ^ ^ • . 1 • • .* '^ • • • •• V-' . C-r. 1 *•#*"• u ^ (ti o /6 iiiEi t| )■ ■ " A'" V . "^..s' ' *S, V-^ ^ * r- ! •- :•' ■'rl %- •c i4i6b >«=■ r. g ivifijp .1. g* B it i.iU:. pi nr Viplil 1^:1 K > liV *• • Tw ' * .• ' ^ *• "V * » ^ .s *' % - ?itnii , • |lll2&fiiB| t Ti ■Mit _ A '.2• *v t / »»t:T» , » V * ' V < \ i • * •• t. # %• V *». «f • » 1 t ** 1 .4 '«« » 1 f. * #■ N ■« -' • ^ A H • 6 A %• -4 t «• X • ^* -w X o . o • r/ in viu U -. T ^ f> « I r . ^ F'.:. i j ,« • ( i •• iijiiii «/. t• 1 1 [ ». h • ♦ •%• / rr MR ■MM “Mtm 1 **1 . • * t • • • ft.ft 1 1 f 1 1 • 1 « 1 » 1 i •ft 1 • «#•i #• * 9 1 , rii. f A • V “ 1 ► #' ^S } • \1 \, '• • »• /f' "» ra V fV 1 mm y-T J vtft] kJ. t f %••>'# 4«* •f.•. - ft m.■ • ’• ••> • 4 •»# • •V.' . 4 M # A ft mf %kr *,} • N '•f *#•J.- ’VV fift ■ •'y - 1 . r X %• -•' *.V; V r«V - » '"‘is • ♦ ^ ^ - • ■ V . I •«f .♦ • V • •* > '-.w''* *- -*» * ^ ---i . n\ - - • . . ♦ - .. V •* C:*/• % ,• /*> V .i . / VI • .; ’• • •• • *# * t-. - r i . 1 . t mf • - . > •* • 0‘> V m tu rn m i ■ f ■ I .V ^ .i ' > »• •'•.»• • . HBIM m .ml nEini • r.f. ' * . » t' ^ J: '•ST m; i V » •/ • • 'kir. • » r • 3 •^V • • ... -f • ‘ •-« 'f »r*% • ♦ % t .* • • • r« ♦ ^ ■.-f 1^ i)'' c> . rt -s O •M op • • ; i-tMiAUu-I 11 ■ ~ * w y \ { i T T A [ I - •, ^ •• ■ • V4'’* ^ . i j:. . \ m # ,4 ’#• VI r^'«> ■ I • *1 ' ‘v;l V l**'^ r*’*■I • 111 "'t- >.’•' •• *. ,r “.■<•«•■ tt * ■I'.V'I^ •' >t I - r TMi' «, * • s *9 ^ I 'aViM,ii. r- yi -“H■.. • . I •> • j -.I'1 i? • * ^ ‘^1 ^ *1 ' I ‘ * I ■ ^ • 1 « < ♦ • > > •».« B* 7^1 Y •Jv"’^4 ' * vrt^' ■ i . » >w. r ? 4 • iv«fl ‘■‘-I ;'^V* »f V/nr.^Hh’' 4/r X.'"' #T-;*-r- » • i * • • . . * ‘ , * --• . - - • ’ I ' ' * • *“• ... ^ ^ .r . ^ m •. • t: <%i USE aoaa li- F, ^ess u rfc “Si* ll jli ll Bvf-t. acai «JA8 i.yM **i ■•I TT .* .♦ .■*'••'j w • . *0 4*.,y • • v^J i l#/l ..»v Ik 9^ ^ • . . wl****' " ^ %y-i ^ ' .' 'r - ♦ ^1 4 r' ♦' : ’ll -kmi '*■4 ^<•<1 |\'T-». oa «J&B II .V r3B >«l«IV; .'3 S|! U r-5 Hi* *> ■ '* .-'. X 4 *.. '•y- y** t : **, '•' Y*'^ V * * .r . . . - i#f»'"•, •’w' f ra , • • • • * 11111 Sa iVS wnTlI^lw J :• t' 5; *• m. iti'J lia-ir L V . 4 ' •' * ■■■ *'■’ ■.•' ''■ '‘'"^r*^ L • r iV-* 1 • ‘ w ^*L - 7 V .*'•35 V* * - V.# ^•’,^.+*'v 1 f *t "7Uo--i-^'V •' ^;S|K^ <' - 1 -i'-O ":fc?'Pillmm ,Kiu®BaB5S5 SpBa^s»Ra®|8 #• *1 r > it.^v i'Mi* l-|j lifc' l'L;i-,?^^':'.M|ll ikW^iil ^mi ? > V .1 lllilpliHylil -refill •A :■•■i :J. \ L C! 4.'* ' ( ^SiP'i?fS4 I A/ ^0C .pp:5 0) r O' : ‘ f'^, <'• ^ VV-' - r" .•^, • , .. . . ‘ • - ■>. »- ‘ .:; ■. ..•* .•■-’•'■ • ' t -i* - '••• • *. -V* * _*d;*:* A*/'. • ■* •■;;i • ■* ♦.. , ‘ ‘ .. ’ .*m •’'V/' : *;-•■■:** ^ ’’ ■■ > c ‘-‘’n-* *f; »*;i; ’ ■;• .V . T. ■•.•'; • ••'- ' ' •• ** ..•. *: •.'*’•>• *• **• ‘ ^ '* •.«> . \ : ■»/• .««••. ^ * • * ^. ^ . • • • 'I ' «l>*t ^ i »* 4 • •* ' .‘Vr .■’ ; * . ^ . . '» ■ ■. *.•, -* ■ • . • '. . .' - • -, . - ________• ^ -r _ • -. ^ K- ■ -r.^ I- i *• ? i‘4? ■:•-.i ■^1% %\ ft—A T *. 1 >1L^l 1 1 • 1 » 1 1 1 •:r l/^ V&'J j' k. iJ -.< A. m ,.'i-^• « •• •t it • : t 1 ' *n i^i> I.* *• • • «.t I. • Ck^*'j i t *f i F^= I I • I • ♦ I ••’I \ m I ’• f W *-*4 « / ll. > t 4 * I t;i A - • * t I# 4 I I » . I » j ••* « i - - • - ii •*/‘j 4 f* i \ • • • •Z/Ls^-v /ueif,/ -^ri>.T^ !l T’;^* ’|r^=>x^ ,r; I ' ^ V Fm -------------- .J-~ i • I •^'• hO-c:- .I J. r-' K/ *-/K^- j ife»- - L’i*, ■y: '- • - ■■I■'■s*.- • ' ,i ••• ' '*» .'‘ •^' '• .•. V' *• •■" ■ ■ ■ • * '•* ■*• v''^'•**■•-■"’ V • , - \ •* - V - " ■ . • "‘ * ' . • . " V- ' *W • - ' • . V •- * • ^ .• f , •-S' •■ ^ ^ fc - • • •• •.% - »* t I r . • *! ' '.I.--- *r. . . ^ oate i -me {.' % .V7* ..; “ *.w ; . •;. / . -* ' •*» J- . *.• - ^ * -^ r* • • • •. t 4 . .*• ' • • . -•■••.•- ^ ^ * ' * • ■ .' * •••’♦.", . I • '» ■'*■-• . • ^ .• *.v'•Cv .•-• ' . ' , ^ •' ‘ *• * *. •..#.• . ;: -.--.-5 • A.- V.-'V.-*:*. • ■ • . • •. * ' •■ . • 4 >. • *. • * • ♦' ' . ■ • ' • . . ^ • • . *. *. • f •»• • V» •* •'•.•’V '* ** /■* * *'-n, ' ♦ . •■ •! -•%"••• .** -C - • r» •'V. •.* •• .:'7i • • •- • -• >..* • -J-V- V'^;;.-';-. , vvv • .. * .«. •*•»' * '• *•:•<; / * ‘*.?^ # ri , ^* • • >« 1*4 * • .■^4 .r ;V - CITYOFORONO INSPECTION NOTICE PERMIT NO________ CALLED IN SCHEDULED COMPLETED 6-9-9/ 6- <5-’o o 9:00 ADDRESS AJO _________ OWNER_____/L->(fAAJQ<"/^^ CONTR. TELEPHONE NO. Q 2a: □ FOOTING u FRAMING G INSULATION C WALL BD. G FINAL G DEMO — SITE C DEMO —FINAL G PLUMBING RI G PLUMBING FINAL □ MECHANICAL RI □ MECHANICAL FINAL G SITE WELL G WELL TEST PUMP □ FIREPLACEAVOOD BURNER □ EXCAV/QRADING/nLUNG □ WATER HOOK-UP C METER SET/TURN ON G SEWER HOOK UP □ SEPTIC MAINT. □ SEPTIC INSTALL □ SEPTIC FINAL C LAKESHOREAVETLANOS □ TREE REMOVAL ^SITE INSPECTION □ PROGRESS □ COMPLAINT C FOLLOW-UP COMMENTS:I ° UAtje.^y^/^ O(fct<-»ro< <Q>A)£^Co 0: Uj CL § O 6A-iJ2-Go r * , . . k • ^. j CCo Ui Ct Uj 5 Uj q: ST~0^2A-y->, /L\orL.'A-tt V>J^Q______ » •. • . * AT*oiyy Jt ,..j ••«..>••• '• ' .n;* *•>**'-• P^ibu^iT-s At^^/UjAI •• •*' T\'.'*l. - * j.*-. 2- A A^((Af<rC^ __n. 'ri (qjt> /^GL> (/Za/7 BoT~ >-0/* LoQU (c^ Qt^^, . -..;! a Ujoc Uj Q O CJ r /IXyJ/h^hr*^.-•■‘r. '-V ■■:•■•'•:•-‘-v .'■■-.-V-'-r' ><;:G WORK SATISFACTORY: PROCEED G CORRECT WORK 4 PROCEED C CORRECT WORK, CALL FOR RBNSPECTION BEFORE COVERING □ CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN____ INSPECTOR WILL RETURN HOURS. □ STOP ORDER POSTED. CALL INSPECTOR a INSPECTION REOUIRED. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. C PHOTO TAKEN □ CITATION ISSUED □ PROJECT COMPLETE G ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY _________TEMPORARY _________PERMANENT Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. 473*7357 4 Owner/Contractor cm site: -------------------------------------------------------— Qi7 £ ^/Z<yCjf _______Inspector / Whit« Copy/lnsp«ctor*s Fll«Ctiiiry Copy/SUt Notice (.. *: V * •• ^ • •. ::7- • •• •• ♦ • ':^’Kyrj i-j '•••A. . *.• * • . ' • . : ^4 .. ^ 'f ‘s • ^^». ^» » »• YW*«'"V . ■* -* •«* '•"’.- * - • • • • . -V ,*• # *< m « i • *• . •. •: -s 5'. »mn i ^^iii y^-tV; :'>v ^ ------ “fea:^'•'■■■•-■:■•• \"- ■i:fe/:':'-av4' t, mi w, IIW. T»M ».«. urn • t. Dima omttai 1. Tilt p.>. niU Jam »>mtMr, MJ OW Umh Uka «aa4 - IraUaiurTfabdlalaioa I. 'iM #.■I. |ITJ« Jaka aaraar, nJI laiaiaa laad - rraUalaarT (aMlTltlaa acrtea TIBM - ta»la» ot thaaa It feataaaa ackadalad pablie haarla«a- I fciar ta at apalleaata ptaaaatlap tatlaaea tayaata *M J~ii;i2;tVmM*?m!r “wirc.tlar1i aa.«i.eaa hr tha Chall Mlltaa alllar, «*l Caaea lalnt Paad - Vatiaaca - CoBtlaaatiaa at Pahllc taatlap Taaai 1. Poadia, lili Coaditlaaat Oaa Patadt/va« fahUc laatiap *. Caace Polat laad - ratlaaca - CootlapaUaB af elali aaad. 32te Uaarra Lana - Clalt aaaa. n( a la« Uaa haatta a al Pahllc laatinf Clati aaad, taaidantlal _ Cantlaaatlaa cult aaad, im aaaanad hap Tatlaaea - Pahlle Baatia* flTII tlTM ss.s.TU'sjrt'Lin.’sss.— ■ Esn sleetlis : ssr aiehacd aallaadat, »M »atlh Bta »tlaa Tatlaaeaa - Pahlta laatiaf \ ' inrnmmtm p^fIm f ,M w» S3 « S' o s ♦J -5cni>.S4i$ £ 2i3*c <*. azL.«-*rM^Q>*>M4^fp>cC wb-ocow .a'^§^2.‘-foS'fe°a^|^S 5 .i S ? >, £ i: a s a 2 ~R I ^ s 2 ^ 4,^ o fi 0J04»'t'Cyysoi. —4-* Q.H- ^ ^ wet/) w w o<incceH*o^ c--«o owowm • fo w*r *'3 ^ W if) to : .2 » o u tw ‘^ - S'^ SS^6 ^ e c cn w «w X Oir i*^'^5°5 ’s£^-°>s'^£ 0> wa'tlwciwt. C </) w--«>«w 0»0t £ r °*7Si=°5£'S £'°5£2at!5 ’S§ £X 4<9W Oiw 0>T3 ^UJ .«.*0^ A<vcNjecwu o^wa<tk.ia«« *9t/> d»<ofc.w -^0)t^cww^2d/ Ufo— 'oc o •«->L. a^uw^*oi/tt/>a> *•4(0ti<0OWCUJW5lirt».(^ «<q^.mUOe3c«/t-«« iaujI 09w o» <Oi/t fc-io£ - t B F = - O^ c j c^ "I a,^5g ^I -« 2 a< 33 -^ >•‘'5^1^ p c. ^/ - ■^/7-JU. .-1 I .N r=ii c3:3 ^ -S ^ o» u i. Ot c£552 l-^:- n£3 K'li -f? f ? ,;.^V -'i; '.Vil»': v,.' i 0? CO ! h »-< 11 1ll=fe. '*Vi-J > « o •I If* K g C 1-?:r5 /y/ 0^£ ^ e CT ir» ! 00 e >H *H ro> - a o X 8 C 00 S S <w _i4 4JV4<0X«C0*Jo^nc3 x:w >.*0 0 o 4JiJ VHC«n<«ooQ o**^u»k4Ujeie"4 /I Vj .8 Mae|^H>n<Mao 0“kiU9iK<ueiC'W «S'l4S§0'MC'SiS^82t:8 ’°SS°o"u fNbUOVC £ OIC (7>'W ‘CO «l U V 0 wc uu *J«<<w3<;«ig u*i«u co ■«noui:<c c.r- g « u -H I tr 0 >« coo « U«*«(N «MU £4^0)^>x:c:-'OOafoo4J«)C>,gt4j 0) c « «U »«dC«4J««C. r^(ni:^OC«£U« £ 4J 0)^ V « c I >H *H *H c O 4J <0 «M u; H « 0 V tJ C 4J H «M Q%4 <n a)o)crv04;*-4 9^40 C a C m -s;: (B4J4J0Jfc4<Crni: u 0 « 0) u n 44 •H H 0/ OJ d *"• **J (C — ^ u V c >•w 01 n -M ucr c < V « er 3 C O <0 c $ cn W C U*. C ^ *4 0? 0) -C £«tt*044 3O«4J0)C«O «4JUU44 4> OM3l$C0IVC>MCC*O r-H%4ZaO 3<MC£ c 4J o a)«wa}Ooi44c c ^c «o«*4u *j Vi m jz Vi E OrSkMM IQMO) a-HHCCOC 4J 44C<M ocx:xn(/)ki x: ^u -h 'qoj oicu owvn 4i or c*04JUc«44CQ*Hx:cu-'4a) «cro)44-^ *^*04J-H ftic;a;«caiB4.*ocQ> ^ 4J c V c t m •<nc<Q'M^c*C4J tt o;a.Q uu« H —uorowo'Mic^ifi'o r-ujc c ««K «or««-o«o a)<u^-H-H«Mvc4Jor C.5 c acM * tr t3 « •=.*c « 0 hh *w £« *4^rJSo, .-5-ro5^-5c;3-H.« iev*j^£Oi:Q fC-HC 8.; S :i ///j if/ /? A If JiXv ^ r— ll p ;•# ^5" 11 OiSO te C “ • C .-4 r40iO Z0)|^«OC4>C^n44*HVl0 4J4*' 1 o; a-H «w ^ o c ^ M • w 14JC9* cro)«a4J.w ^ooor IOrUC«$^«C3Q44ie<MZC'C ■ OOC J3 VHCO.IQW -HO)•wO^O 0^3CH A«tn >,.-4 4J C4<>«mCCU£iQK CLf^ C -H0 *H -w 3 J U C 644trca*ocr«s V r c 0 V Q 'H c or 4J X « £ (J V \ • ••• ^ V r \ 4 •-. V' IP. C ^/- ^/73^ e (r E •H C « ^ > o VMM tUf 3 * -H H - B * s N 0 IP V’^ 4v 1734 VC. m m i /-- ••*#f --\ «» v> « ! 5 5 k * 7...7 feCf0 - P ‘d '&M 1 h S i f: m ts i‘* ■^^■ |S'^ ^ ©iiili % '" » • ■ .' "v' .;■...•.• • - m/ ■ '■ ;i>, -t It S:; "V ■1^— > \ b-■■ >'■.. ./-•"'; ":-~^imr.wiiiinft' :'■- '•w., •• •'" ■MWM w >-^ i I-;/ ’■ V 4-' |Mjjjgpj|gMiiiiiijiiiii.... II.... Irr- ' - : -p,C. S /i- 90^ I ; _ _ _ _ _ _ •’il ' ^CL'NTr I Y 3 Y '1. R«9rad« roadway to laVa ao watar ahada off to adjacant drainaga ditch. Raaurfaca road with graval to natch aaiating natarial. a. Put In (4) rip rap apillwaya in dUch to alow down warar flow. Dndar rip rap wa will furnish and install filtar fabric to halp with aroaion and waad.infiltration. • 3. Last 120' of drainaga ditch wa willi 1) RanoVa soma small ovargrowth of traas. 2) Bxcavata ditch to provlda positiva drainaga.- 3) Placa filtar fabric and rip rap in ditch. 4) RagMda pathway with graval. i I . ' "I^lska