The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04-20-1992 Planning PacketW- •••^ ♦/■** t'V. ' , V'- --v'Erf- ir- -'Ar •>■ : ■ . «.■ '■ ■&*■'.■ ’> ,‘K tL't-m§ "^...c-'^r.J:i ■ ‘ •' f- 5.i^- mmffei MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 20, 1992 ROLL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Planning Commission Chair Charlie Kelley and Planning Commission Members Maureen Bellows, Charles Schroeder, Candace Rowlette, Stephen Peterson and Ed Cohen. Jeff Johnson was absent. The following represented me City Staff: Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth and City Recorder Teri Naab. Mayor Barbara Peterson, Edward Callahan, Gabriel Jabbour and J. Dlann Goetten were present to represent the City Council. Chair Kelley called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. («1) «1729 CLAIR ROOD, 3280 NAVARRE LANE - RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - PUBLIC HEARING 7:02 - 7:03 P.M. The Af f j dav 11 of Pub I I cat ion and Cert I f I cate of Mai I i ng were noted. It was moved by Chair Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to table Application #1729 for Clair Rood for a residential subdivision of a lot line rearrangement for 3280 Navarre Lane, at the applicant’s request. Ayes 6, nays 0. Rowlette asked where all the dirt on the property was going. Mabusth explained It would be used as fill in designated areas and any excess would be removed from the site. (#2) #1730 GREG MALIK, 3060 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION ~ PUBLIC HEARING 7:42 - 7:58 P.M. The Affidavit of Pub! Ication and Certificate of Mai I ing were noted. Greg Malik was present. Mabusth :^xpialned this is a proposed two lot division. Both lots meet the required 50’ width at the fror* setback line. A private drive will be located within Out lot A to iOrve both properties, and at the time of installation of the shared drive, the existing drive will be removed. She stated that the existing house on Lot 2 does not meet the required 30’ setback from the side lot line, and she encouraged them to approve the out lot as proposed to allow enough room to locate the drive close to the west lot line of the out lot. She stated that with the Installation of the private drive, the existing septic system serving the residence on Lot 2 wii! be destroyed, therefore the house would need to convert to the alternate site which does not meet the required separation setback from the well. The well would need to be abandoned if the alternate septic site is to be used. She noted the second well site is to be abandoned at the time of the sale of the property. She asked Malik his Intentions for the existing residence. 1 '% I- . .J mm .%i Pv': ;Ufa mmM:'- %'M is4 ‘VV V. ■ C\ f-imm, W’lii n. ->.iP ’ j,m w MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 20, 1992 ZONING FILE #1730 - CONT. Malik stated he Intended to live in the existing house until his new house on Lot 1 was completed, at which time he intended to sell Lot 2 as vacant property unless someone wished to restore the existing house. Mabusth explained the applicant plans to use the existing drive during construction. Bellows felt they were creating a problem by allowing a residence to remain without a well and functioning drainfieid. Chair Kelley felt there was a possibility that the house might be vacated and left for many years unoccupied and in disrepair. Bellows asked if a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy could be conditioned upon the removal of the existing residence. Mabusth stated that the Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit required with final subdivision approval would cover the Installation of the shared drive, and abandonment of the septic system. The required improvements could also include demolition of the house and abandonment of the well. Malik requested a 90 day period in which to remove the house. He also requested an additional period of time to occupy the existing residence during the construction of the private drive. Mabusth noted the applicant would be allowed to occupy the new residence during an interim period of time under the Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. Peterson noted the County is requesting a dedication of a 60’ right-of-way. He asked whether the garage would also be removed at the time of the removal of the house. Malik noted that all improvements on the property will be removed. It was moved by Chair Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to recommend approval for Application #1730 for Grog Malik of 3060 Sixth Avenue North for prolIminary subdivision, subject to conditIons #1 through 6, excluding #5 and modification of #4, of the staff memo to Planning Commission dated April 15, 1992, and to the issuance of a Temporary Ce»'t i f I cate of Occupancy allowing the appi I cant 10 days to complete the construction of the shared drive, and within 90 days of the Certificate of Occupancy the existing house and out lot buiIdings wi11 be removed, and the existIng septic system and weii will be abandoned per current ordinances. Ayes 6, nays 0. ' ■‘i -. ' 'iMmmM r*: ifiia ’ ’I '<'f- i - ^ ^^v ‘‘ --.y. • mm^ -"Wr MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 20, 1992 ev: »>c-- ZONING FILE *1730 - CONT. Chair Kelley requested that the Letter of Credit be written to Include the removal of the ex IstIng res Idence and out lot buI 1dIngs, the abandonment of the existing septic system and well, and the construction of the shared drive. Malik asked about the Fiowage and Conservation Easement. Mabusth explained that the Easement will be taken over the designated wetland and shall be designated as a drainage easement on the plat. mmmmm (*3) *1698 JIM RIVERS, 1442 SHORELINE DRIVE - VARIANCE - CONTINUATION OF A PUBLIC HEARING 7:27 7:30 P.M ■j- r,,. ' ' fe;::Mr. and Mrs. Jim Rivers were present.§mrnm^ Mabusth explained that the application involves a three season porch on the lakeside of the house. She noted it consists of approximately 317 square feet of hardcover. The applicants’ amended appl I cat ion proposes approximately 240 square feet of green area adjacent to the roadway to offset hardcover In the 0-75’ setback area. Rivers commented that the total green space proposed for both lots is approximately 570 square feet, and he felt that the Commission should consider all the marina property as one as it all works together. Chair Kelley asked If the house to the north was currently occupied, and if not, would the applicants consider removing the house in trade for the deck. Rivers did not think that was feasible. Cohen reviewed that the building permit issued in 1976 noted no improvements for a deck. Mabusth explained that the applicant was granted a variance for the 1976 addition to the lakeside of his home, and the permit and butiding plans specif leally stated that only steps for access would be allowed as additional hardcover. Rivers noted that the deck was added at the time of the addition and plead ignorance as to why the deck was not approved at that time. .'b Mr1 / Mi . .A? i-’-c;4a|^,: ,v V;, .;;‘;«^;v^^j? 3%^ ... S^?' ■ '•^%f . ^ ■ ■’ -> f-’>*■'*»J ^v‘ *• r*‘ aiSiSi:, V .. : 'j ■') SJ?.v rfSil»! =■ '• j.w”^ij^-'’v; •' I»cj,. .. .iiU ■m'-^L«r'^ ■ •t.-'TTOa ♦ :iii, .1 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 20, 1992 ZONING FILE «1698 » CONT. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Cohen, to recommend denial of Application #1698 for Jim Rivers of 1442 Shoreline Drive, for the after-the-fact variance for the enclosed deck as the permit Issued in 1976 specifically stated that approval was only for access stairs, and only those access stairs can remain as indicated on that permit. Ayes 6, nays 0. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Bellows, to recommend that the enclosed deck be removed by July 1, 1992. Ayes 6, nays 0. (#4) *1700 DALE MCCURDY, 4041 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCE - REFERRED BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION FOR ADDITIONAL REVIEW Mrs. McCurdy was present for this application. Mabusth explained the applicants seek approval of the intensification of hardcover where excesses already exist. The applicants propose the construction of an 8*x17* second story deck over an existing patio. She noted the application was originally brought before the Planning Commission absent an updated survey and hardcover inventory as the applicants had asked for special consideration to use an earlier survey and inventory review from a 1986 appiI cat ion. The appiicants have provided an updated survey of the property since Council concurred with the Planning Commission that an updated survey was necessary. She stated the current proposal does not propose an increase in hardcover. McCurdy noted that the original survey was done by staff for the 1976 review, and the current submittal was done by Coffin and Qronberg. She noted the deck was intended to be included with the 1986 addition. Rowlette noted that with the 1986 review, staff indicated Ox hardcover In the 0-75* zone. She asked of what the additional hardcover consisted. Mabusth explained that the staff Inventory of 1986 was incomplete, and the hardcover listed on the current hardcover Inventory is not new hardcover. The percentage for the 0-75’ zone includes lakeshore decking, access stairs, and part of the house. Chair Kelley asked about further hardcover reductions. K 'l, ,, ^ r>'4 .. i:-V W: i * ' MM ■i: '.; '\ K ' .1 'f. . ‘V/- ; /' ' ■ ' MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 20, 1992 :m ZONING FILE »1700 ~ CONT. r. v>;?.K>-V:>*C wK^mn McCurdy explained they did reduce hardcover with the 1986 review on the west side of house but felt there wasn’t anywhere else they could remove hardcover. (yk'iA'i Schroeder asked 4oout the two garages. McCurdy explained they use the garage near the road during the winter because of the steep slope of the drive. -if It was moved by Chair Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to recommend denial of Application #1700 for Dale McCurdy, 4041 North Shore Drive, because of the intensification of excessive hardcover on the property. Ayes 4, nays 2. Rowlette and Schroeder voted nay. McCurdy noted that with the exception of the addition in 1986, all improvements on the property have been in place since 1976. i. ■Rowlette stated she would like to see the hardcover percentage reduced, however the deck Is being placed over existing hardcover. Be!lows asked about plans from the 1976 project. in the City files and theMabusth noted they were never located applicant did not have copies. mi Schroeder agreed with Rowlette and felt they could put the applicants on notice that no additional hardcover on the property would be a I lowed. (#6) THOMAS LYTLE, 1935 CONCORDIA STREET - VARIANCE CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:16 - 7:22 P.M. Thomas Lytle was present. Mabusth reminded the Commission that this application was originally tabled to allow applicant time to reconsider the relocation of the lakeside deck, which he has done. The deck now encroaches 3’ Into the 0-75’ setback zone resulting In 56 square feet of hardcover or IX within that zone. It also Increaw^s hardcover In the 75-250’ zone by approximately 190 square feet or IX as the majority of the deck has been located behind the 75* setback line. She reviewed the location of the mature trees in the lakeshore yard. j."' , y.i n—^TiTT^ T* ‘,' 'r'\^ i^if-k'''! ' • i? Jk^'j- i ''’a |k^3| • = ;»1. j»'. .■>. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 20, 1992 J i;s .. r-- .*» vvt?£^r\ 'fj.i-' my}- n3 4 '■ ' ^' *’* *'^1 L*'')fe:^ wp^MM mM '}~}W T, '.V ''' , i.y ■^W0^/ ' f ■ ZONING FILE #1714 - CONT. Lytle reminded the Commission that his iakeshore lot line decreased by 11* after having an updated survey done. Chair Keliey asked which way the drainage flows on the property in the front yard and the dimensions of the garage. Mabusth noted that drainage flows towards the house. She stated that the proposed garage is 22’x22* and staff has added a backup apron for safety purposes. Cohen asked about removals of existing hardcover. Lytle stated there was nothing on the property to remove. It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Cohen, to recommend approval of Application #1714 for Thomas Lytle of 1936 Concordia Street, for a street setback and side setback variance to construct a detached garage, a iakeshore setback variance and average iakeshore setback variance to construct a deck, and hardcover variances to increase hardcover in both the 0-75’ and 75-250’ zone by 1* in each zone, approval based upon hardships stated by applicant and the fact that the applicant has shown a good faith effort. Ayes 6, nays 0. (#6) #1724 TAMMY L. IfOODIS, 2818 CASCO POINT ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 8:11 - 8:12 P.M. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Rowlette, to table Application #1724 Tammy L. Woodis of 2818 Casco Point Road until such time that the applicant or a representative can be present. Ayes 6, nays 0. (#7) #1726 DAVIS FANSLER, 4180 BAYSIDE ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING 7:26 - 7:27 P.M The Af f i dav 11 of Pub I i cation and Cert I f I cate of Mai i I ng were noted. Davis Fansier was present for this application. Mabusth reviewed that the City recently approved a street setback variance for this property and during that review the applicant informed the City that he would be seeking approval for a non rental guest apartment. She noted the apartment meets all pertinent standards. 6 . .fill \ ' m w rr#v ^'v -4*- v^jyV-* ■:.7:r- ,r-:^ ‘.a,'*. * . » •, mm MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 20, 1992 •fmrm. ' ■ZONING FILE #1725 - CONT. • - _' Pansier explained this apartment will be for his mother-ln-Iaw.'I v-Ui m h ^■ ''Tiv^ mm r * a '■mmi -. I •■ It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Bellows, to recommend approval of Application #1725 for Davis Fansler of 4180 Bayside Road for a conditional use permit for a non-rentai guest apartment, subject to the apartment never having a separate entrance from the principal residence and that the apartment may never be uused for rental purposes. Ayes 6, nays 0. WME'mm (#8) *1726 BARBARA AND JAMES OLEXA, 996 WILDHURST TRAIL - VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING - 7:34 - 7:36 P.M. Whm The Affidavit of Pub I I cat I on and Certificate of Mailing wore noted. Barbara and James Oiexa were present. mJ-- •Mabusth explained that the applicants propose a 20*x30* addition to the east of the existing residence and the removal of an existing garage. The proposed addition consists of a garage and a covered patio area. Staff has amended hardcover within the 75- 250* zone to include landscape area underlain with plastic discovered on site by staff. Mr. Oiexa stated that they were unaware of the plastic and were willing to remove It. m Cohen stated that should take care of the excess of hardcover. Mabusth stated that would actually reduce the overall hardcover percentages for the property. Chair Kelley asked about the neighbor to the east. Mabusth stated that all neighbors have approved of the proposed plans. Rowiette felt that the addition was too close to the side lot Iine. Mrs. Oiexa pointed out that the lot line angles and the addition is only close at the rear lot line. Mabusth stated that their comprehensive plan includes an expansion of the second story over the existing garage. ■K^v: a ■ V* ; Pi® Aijai r m « 'l 4mi. m V > •VV' ■■■ '** ■• ,- ■'*•1 -r;>- '■' : *»' ^'m atnl^'a •?;ii ' J* ; ■ ^ fif ;.;-2^4ia P S-.vAiX':',m ‘V mM ■i , • -iC' ;V-_ ^ .r. Lr< m MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 20, 1992 ZONING FILE #1726 - CONT. It was moved by Schroeder, seconded by Peterson, to recommend approval of Application #1726 for Barbara and James Oiexa of 995 WiIdhurst Trail, for side setback and hardcover variances to construct an addition to the existing residence, subject to the removal of the existing detached garage and all plastic under rock be removed on the property. Ayes 6, nays 0. (#9) #1728 MOLLY AND DRAPER JAFFRAY, 540 BARRETT AVENUE - VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 8:00 - 8:10 P.M. The Affidavit of Pub 11 cat I on and Certificate of MallIng were noted. Molly and Draper Jaffray were present. Mabusth explained that the applicants are proposing a three story addition which requires a street setback variance of 25’. The existing residence is 12’ from the right-of-way. The proposed addition will be 25’ from the right-of-way where a 50’ setback is required. She noted the garage to be located at the lower level, the family room on the first floor, and a bedroom on the second floor. Access to the garage will be gained through the alley to the east, and the applicants will still maintain access onto Barrett Avenue. Rowlette asked the intentions for the existing garage and felt It could be in a hazardous condition. Mr. Jaffray stated that they would like to leave the garage for storage, and In the future they may either repair It or remove it. Cohen asked if the City has ordinances requiring the maintenance of such structures. Mabusth stated that there is not specific standards for maintenance of structures, but if a building is found to be hazardous, then the City can proceed with legal action. She stated the rear wail of the garage Is pushed out because of pressure from the hill. She noted that If the building were removed, the owner would need to install some type of retaining wall. If the structure were to be rebuilt, it would require variance approval. Jaffray understood staff recommendation to remove the existing garage and felt that would be reasonable. Peterson asked If the garage could be aliowed to remain until completion of the new garage. 8 i t* 11 iitifft re- ^ ' *1 * ■ ■ X ^p ^iv; -:3 ' -y,' :'.■ r -t iB,m^ *A ’/ wm MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 20, 1992 ZONING FILE *1728 - CONT. ’JA ^ • Vkim. Mabusth pointed out that the applicants own six conti&wious lots, but only three of them are combined. Jaffray explained that one of the lots is torrens and the others abstract, making the procedure very difficult. !■' ■ • . > S !§i It was moved by Schroeder, seconded by Bellows, to recommend approval of Application #1728 for Molly and Draper Jaffray of 540 Barrett Avenue, for a front street setback variance to construct an addition ^o the existing residence, subject to the removal of the existing garage 30 days after completion of the proposed addition. Ayes 6, nays 0. =•«!Rowlette noted that staff Is requesting detailed grading and drainage plans with the building permit application. ' . , ^ ■ * m • |ti|t. Mabusth stated that because of the steep topography and the need to alter existing grades, applicant must provide detailed grading plans. '.f-m ; r- • . , a ; :''v (#10) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE Rowlette noted she was happy with all the decisions made by the Counci I. (#11) REPORT BY THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVE Chair Kelley noted the Committee would meet Wednesday, April 22, 1992 at 7:45 a.m. at the Council Chambers. (#12) REPORT BY THE FACILITIES COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVE ' : ^r V -1iA>'.vr ■ .. i ■ 'i? Chair Kelley noted the Committee would meet on Tuesday, April 1992 at 5:00 p.m. at the Orono Link. (#13) OTHER ISSUES 'WP.;r There were no other issues. (#14) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Chair Kelley, to approve the minutes of the March 16, 1992 Planning Commission meeting. Ayes 6, nays 0. mm- mrmm:: MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 20, 1992 (#15) REPRESENTATIVE TO THE MAY 11, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING Cohen and Peterson volunteered to attend the May 11, 1992 Council meeting. ADJOURNMENT Chair Kelley adjourned the regular Plannl/«g Ion' meeting at 8:14 p.m. mssSi li; Char Ies cKalr Person .• 91 w •S:1.;' \X. k MX' '* yy i*Wf ir-L'. W:: iSife“ to.; ••' .y '■•' K •', .h:y-r I ■\ ■i‘ ■ ‘ "'M— .^^*v)-'. % ^ • Miiil ,>'f 1 feSWSP* ', :'r.' ;■h4 ■:V illM ■ ■ '.'. '''■;•• ^>:.- :.••• -\*T >8'r "• ^*1 mrnmfmdil^^l '-te'sraiSikWi \r=p^v;' ^'^;.;v,S t-k • '^lT * -.1 •■'■’ fv,"' - V.- • A 7} isSi »i-i m mM }.r --W. v>‘ PISPm PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, APRIL 20, 1992, 7s 00 P.M. 1275 BR0NN ROAD SOOTH - CODNdL CHAMBERS mM -<m NCIL REPRESENTATIVE - Barbara Peterson ENDANCE V • .>:\ ' %■, SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING 1. 7:00 p.m. #1729 Clair Rood, 3230 Navarre Lane - Residential Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement 2. 7:30 p.m. #1730 Greg Malik, 3060 Sixth Avenue North - Preliminary Subdivision ACTION ITEMS 3. #1698 feiui'a-*; - Jim Rivers, 1442 Shoreline Drive - Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing 4.f #1700 ■T r Dale McCurdy, 4041 North Shore Drive - Variance - Referred back to Planning Commission for additional review 5. #1714 Thomas Lytle, 1935 Concordia Street - Variance ~ Continuation of Public Hearing #1724 Tammy L. Woodis, 2818 Casco Point Road - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing #1725 Davis Pansier, 4180 Bayside Read - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing #1726 Barbara and James Olexa, 995 Wildhurst Trail - Variance - Public Hearing % #1728 p ’T/. Molly and Draper Jaffray, 540 Barrett Avenue - Variance - Public Hearing W0X Ml ■ V PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS 10. Report by Planning Commission Representative to Council Meeting of April 13, 1992 (Candace Rowlette). 11. Status Report by Lake Use Committee Representatives. 12. Status Report by Facilities Committee Representatives. 13. Other issues. ■ % 4 ■; I T-x % jr ADDITIONAL ITEMS , ^ ^14. Planning Commission approval of minutes of March lor 1992 meeting« ^15. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend ^ the May 11, 1992 Council Meeting. ADJOURNMENT : M ''Vmr L>m k- ♦Ti ' Rlflp mm aswilwig ’iikilll - ■j r-mit iUa^ iM Mi wmm i'lmwm '■\'-mww. mmm WmM ■ :>ikki-vi SI m t ty ' • '» •- * •• * •w ■'V -t V' Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Fr< Date Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator April 16, 1992 .i • #1729 Clair Rood, 3280 Navarre Lane - Residential Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Public Hearing mm Zoning District: LR-IC, Lakeshore Residential requiring 1/2 acre in area jPertinent Ordinances Section 11.03, Definition 65 (A) - Subdivision application is required as lot line realignment involves properties that will not meet requirements of the Zoning Chapter. City will also ask for Drainage and Utility Easements along shared lot lines of new building site. Section 11.03, Definition 66 (A) - Subdivision shall be classified as Class I subdivision. It can be permitted via a meteg and bounds description described by a registered land surveyor. Section 10.25 - Standards for LR-IC Zoning District requiring one-half acre in area. Proposed Building Site Required = .5 acre or 21,780 s.f. Proposed » .5 acre (3,320 s.f. wet area) Area Variance * 3,320 s.f. or .15 acre Remainder of Lot 56 » .5 or 21,780 s.f. « 20,425 s.f. dry contiguous area » 1,355 s.f. or .06 acre Required Proposed Variance % Section 10.55, Subdivision 15 (A) (2) - For property served by municipal sanitary sewer, the minimum lot area may be divided by flood fringe lands provided at least one-h alf acre of land not within the protected area is included in one contiguous parce1 and both municipal sewer and legal access is available to that building site without encroachment on the protected area. ■’-‘‘r ' -4- nv- m SSSMii^ ‘‘k’ : J.>W i .1 0 '1 • '• .1'; • * * --11 "AC ; • a• •• V V Zoning File #1729 April 16, 1992 Page 2 y.h i ^a#ifci..- Zrii. m List: of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Survey of Lot Line Rearrangement E - Resolution #2989 P - Conservation and Flowage Easement (wetland 931.5' and 15' drainage easement to south of property) G - Council Minutes 7/22/91 H - Rood Letter 7/15/91 I - Sewer "As~builts" J - Sketch of Properties Owned by Rood K - Staff Sketch-Impact Proposed Subdivision Description of Lot Line Rearrangement mw im'. Mr. Rood proposes a lot line rearrangement that would take additional lands from Lot 56 to be combined with Lots 54 and 55 that must meet the 1/2 acre dry contiguous minimum lot area. As survey notes, the lot is shown at .5 acres. Section 10.55, Subdivision 15 (A) (2) requires a minimum 1/2 acre of dry contiguous area for each building envelope. The approximate 3,320 s.f. of wetland area has not been considered. Applicant has option to either realign lot line along the north or east side to acquire the additional dry area. Lots 54 and 55 have each'been assessed a half water unit. As a result the City will require no additional fees for the connection to municipal water, merely the connection permit and meter fee. Lots 54, 55 and 56 have all paid lateral sewer charges. The only fee to be paid against the sewer is a $225.00 unit fee with the building permit. As with the connection to municipal water, the connection to municipal sewer will require a connection permit and payment of SAC currently at $700.00. Review of Application #1604 'm Review Exhibits D, G, H and J. Some members will remember their participation in the review of Application #1604 that involved a conditional use permit and variance review for the installation of a retention pond and retaining walls at approximately a 3 1/2' height running 100+ lineal feet at the northwest and southwest corners of the property. During that review, pillars that were currently under construction at approximate 5* height were required to be altered so that a 3 1/2* height would be maintained. Much of the proposed improvements have yet to be completed because of our winter that arrived at the end of October. The City has on file a Developer's Agreement and Letter of Credit to ensure that required land alterations will be completed if applicant is unable to complete within reasonable timeline. .m "‘M L. * 1V-- . i':- ;'V’i-.‘: it.'-: '■ v;;,: Zoning File #1729 April 16, 1992 Page 3 One of the recommended conditions of approval was that the properties would all be legally combined as it was the staff opinion that the alterations involved all four parcels owned by Mr. Rood and that the pillars being constructed or Lots 54, 55 and 56 and Rood's homestead parcel were accessory structures and needed the credit of the residence on the homestead parcel. It was also noted that there may be difficulties in the filing of the Conservation and Flowage Easement over the protected wetland area if the properties were not to be legally combined at that point. As the Council minutes note. Exhibit G, Council did not reguire the legal combination based on the finding that if the pillars were to meet 3 1/2* height, there would not be an encroachment and therefore not considered an accessory structure based on the intent of the code. In staff's review of the current files, it is not clear whether the Conservation and Flowage Easement was ever filed in its original format. Based on the final resolve of this subdivision, the City will ask that Mr. Rood be required to work with staff to complete the appropriate amendment of the Conservation and Flowage Easement so that documents can be filed against the Chain of Title of the properties. The original resolution approving variances and condtional use permit was not filed against the Chain of Title because it was torrens property. In light of a recent problem involving torrens property and a lot line rearrangement that the City was asked to help resolve, applicant will be responsible for preparing the appropriate Certificates of Title and deeds for the newly created parcels so that both the subdivision resolution and the Conservation and Flowage Easement can be filed against these properties. Impact of Proposed Subdivision on Total Properties Review Exhibits H and K. Mr. Rood's letter provides his plan for the comprehensive development of his property. Rood proposes the development of Lots 54 and 55 as one building site and the remaining parcel, Lot 56, as a future building site. Based on staff's approximations of the areas as already noted, the proposed lot line rearrangement must be adjusted to provide additional dry land area to Lots 54 and 55 to compensate for the wetlands within the building envelope. The dry contiguous parcel of Lot 56 to the immediate east of the proposed building site does not appear to contain 1/2 acre dry contiguous area. The area has been approximated at 21,700 s.f. and with the exclusion of the 15' wide drainage area at approximately 1,275 s.f. results in 20,425 s.f. of dry contiguous area. The applicant would have to apply for a lot area variance to build on the property. .7 4 -viv:>;• • ■TrttrfrfMiiir ’ J. Zoning File #1729 April 16, 1992 Page 4 m r> It is recommended th?ti the applicant at this time have a surveyor confirm the dry buildable envelope of the remaining contiguous property within Lot 56. If the surveyor provides this certification in area, applicant need not combine remaining Lot 56 with his homestead parcel. As currently proposed, the City must require the legal combination with Rood's homestead parcel. The applicant should also consider the impact of the separation of Lot 56 from the homestead parcel. If Lot 56 is to be developed as a building site, the homestead parcel will lose control over the majority of the now shared improvements. Staff strongly recommends that Mr. Rood consider the impact of current subdivision and his comprehensive plan for the development of this property. Rood may be well advised to alter this application to a two or three lot plat. Options Available to Applicant Mr. Rood has the following options concerning the proposed lot line rearrangement subdivision application; 1. pi Proceed with the current meets and bounds lot line rearrangement and amend the current alignment so that there is 1/2 acre dry buildable land within the proposed building site. ill r If applicant provides confirmation that remaining Lot 56 has 1/2 acre of dry contiguous land to the immediate east of the proposed building site, applicant need not legally coml^ne presented^foif\he^ City's review, remaining parcel 56 would have to be combined with Rood's homestead. OR To refile a Class II subdivision of a replat of two or three lots with the inclusion of the homestead parcej. Platting of this property will also simplify the problems with filing the Conservation and Flowage Easement required in Application #1604. Staff Rec<♦' IM t • i#latlon staff would recommend that the subdivision application be tabled until applicant has determined how he wishes to proceed with the comprehensive development of the property and to provide the City with the necessary information to complete that subdivision. Any condition of approval will require that applicant prepare the appropriate Certificates of Title and deeds so that the required documentation can be filed against the Chaxn of Titles of the properties. r*,.•’I- • ^'V s . ; '• -;vr •j- t/':CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address h/Ai'Al^f ’t Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) / 2_3 • *4 M OQ S^ ^OoSS’|^^®S(^ Please* check one - Property_ _abstract or torrens?It i' e Attach legal description to application APPLICANT k. 'f ■I Phone (home) 4^7/-^S'v^-t Name dLA/ifL._____^«ryo<r/Phone (work) ^P/'‘ if S~*f^ Address: City: _ _ _ _ _ _ Zip: ^ OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Neune ^/Aa*v/Phone (work) Address: _ _ _ _ ____ (attach list if more than one) City;_Zip: S3EISTIH6 LAND USE Nximber of Tax Parcels rrry ,'r non-ijr,i/i I f \ji ut\%jnu L V).ir\Ajrc nccrruf AIVr.<Ti.l» Uf f JLWU Development Size "t-Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all 1350200000 ni rcU 7nA /‘i7t VA l^L.11 wfVV»(/V CHtCK TL 300.00 parcels i<tCEIPr-rHA^K YOU ^ ii23B070 cool ROl T03:C Present Use (check)Residential; no. Other (specify) of units ,i7 yr>7 /c yjxj/ L. I • / Present Zoning District PROPOSAL “A"- *.. im Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: / Existing Units New Units Total Units 1 ^ It:.;*a ‘L* Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) /Units per Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) V. i;v ■K. , -f :K-y '¥ V_m^irnwm •V 1 - >. '7'.. . > .I. ;•••‘i SfS ' • min 1. ^ 2. ^ 3. • u.i.•i:i PLETB PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 4. MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR O Completed Application Form ^ ^ ^ this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). ^ 4. t»4. ^As an addendum to this application^ please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ Date 1. Payment of fees (park fees, f-i :g fee, sewer and water assessments). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date- - - - - - - -- FEES £>n JC ' AW- : ' ■ l'. ■ Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II 6 III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement « Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class III & all non-residential) $200.00 300.00 300.00 325.00 + 25.00/Lot Pinal Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 175.00 Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application 150.00 100.00 The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature Date Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the h^Plannlng Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the ^hird Monday of each month* Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, p.lease make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. '‘apPI wm iWiir 'T-S-nrr' t X I r-v' ,-i V i. v: ♦ .•■, '/ SSi *« P-."Si$23s fe-gw ^ M ~ Ul S •< w r- r- w g^SSlSM ?< M M M i ii Di s:: ill > C) fo r“ ♦ KM < _ M 09 M XI > Oo -< o ra x> o o S l/l > > M Q» rsi ill M M M W O O U1 M HO H 5 M3 I/) tA C/> o M 2 H H H ?0 H ? S 5 C/> r!>r- r- H Wm 09 m in > in m^3 m0 v“ ' '* '* ' 5«-COM , IH Q > Ul 01 -< IH Z H lAl N ^ F XI IM > r* M >o M H n O Q H > Z ^ I < C ^ M Z (/> O O M iv -.• ■'“' H -C 1 > rj o ri •f-t/> IM r- O - (/> MH IN H *n H IN 09 in 9 X r- > ^ in > m > r- ^5 5"'«0 5 09 3 > O M XI O > o K O C9 fe •< O S in M ^ S S5 S n c w Si^lwSMH O » M v4 > 9D O > I-< X M3 </) C m o M2 H r- XI H> •• HI r- •• (/) MO H W in 09 m o >in > V r- ^WH 6 o _ M\0 XI 09M XI > (/I > OoX M -< O o ^ ;d S f' ^ Y’- , «. * fc- -/ • •. '>.i^ii it^ISS-< in m m X w > ^ O IN > IN r- r* IN 01 K 4> M M IN C S S in M x! S :x V < Mijqggs- z IN o o e IN 04 M IN 01 H M X r- IN N ^o H > m z M HO rn H> X r- m I -c m X M Z I/) m i/i o M 2 H XI H > X •• -< If- m I/I M m c H IN in 09 Xasscg^s w S$S ^ C- I- 01 _M » M H > OG Z N •< o M Z to *1 ij; Sr', • '<*m SSI ;'*• ■'•v XI M 0 M X O^ X X ^ m in M i/i M n o H H ImtONN^M »H>WOM z > > 2 < V 2 < S X (/> Mrti •-• M H IN g!m^ > o1 -=2 X IN O r- o (/) ro in 09 S ? >in > m r* ^ Z IN X XI O IN S IN Q IN 09< O 9 •• INN 'O m o > X TJ ^ M H O H _ H > » -< ' JSS". Cl H 9 H > m > > O 09 _ sO C C O r- O' r- r- IN ^ M 09 M V X Z H Z ro c. X o IN > M > 09 ^ g 3 S rv9 m m m m IN so X X 09 Z O ID </l INH m V.' -o M Tl "D O IN Q *s| > > O 09 C 09 C C O r- 09 r- r- IN W M 09 M Q X9 Z H O N9 I f- r- o H 5^1/1 3 3x1^fS m m tTMN S Z Q S IN MH m 3 O Of » » ,'s.‘ ■;■' 'V V:- > . ^'v - v'i m 19 .. . 1 -'F.. I»7 ’ P| *i) . Si) . V. "1I •o 50 O-o N < ^ > > rti z o 6 z S os «* w m o5 M r- r- -< M W > »Norn > » m ^ < O m ®i*°m m jf) {J^ ^ m H » % 13 m ;!r- O U4 03 fv» M O M I MI? > M 9 30 ^ m ^ H r- *"§rs» •^4 . .»5 m n fS fi? n M "s O M 1 .1 , .V^ r-' 0 j:m .- -* --" ■> i , •■>■'■--•;>■ -n o ? S M is^s...iiis-^ Q ^ i^3r: m > m m > M 2 3 9 ;o S V 2 M M 9 rs> s Q p m ui m m ill in \M 5P "K-fi • ■■' ■ iVk '■ ■ ■'•'■■ ■•• y\Pr'. ■}■*>•• • '.a‘‘ •< < 0» M p- Z m N|S-ni:l m > m m > M » o N| 5 po p o I M M XIisir In a C®SS§M5275 r ^S^-Scs«w "o m N a ^ac»§sj >n. 0 .0 *7 A ;,. ' 0 > m 2 o o XI o o 90 . ^-^22- •< in ro m m m NO -< •< O' ► o -i m m in M N ► o H m m in H ii *S*CCS7 H O Z Z ^> > O O •» > 04 0» I ^ < m N in M _ J^ o 09 In M rir 50 N > m M 3^ ^ B* 3§ I M M , N m I 8* > f>» < 04 P? M r- f p g Nl > o o m m o %o > 04 •< 5 ?5 " " 2 •< •• 2 04 C C. O M > fN» O 04 p ^ rs> 2 B» M 5 jw 2* H r- H Sm N »•** C 4.m ^ 2 > 2r-M 2 -< o P >» N m m Q -n I H -H 2 > MH - -< 04 In m m M c. m P P 2 C. Mo P o O P 2 2 O m 2 M M sO nS88'^H o w m "li . qi m 3^m o 2 O M p >o 2 04 P P O 04 > > > 04 p • -< - > > rv> p ni m m m S^p p P 2 'O M fH O-I a* 2 O ♦ I ^ o I* A 6 0 Z M 2 ^^8 H P H > m 2 2 2 M H 2 O P P P o r» 2 N > O M 2 >4 O I M St: p p p >o M > O 2 2 M m I 2 2m I N p -n M l: O o S P 2 p r- p >o H» m ^ fo > rv> > ■« ^ -o 3 5^ P P P n4> M o 2 O P ro p rv> p O •-- N I M P M > N4 M P m ?o o p p R r;r'"^- Ti M ^ ■ 0 ••»' t-. H 9» X O > -< > m 2 O 2 > Os 2 2 2 O 2 O 2 > O o 2 o 1^ I n o p 2 **4 2 OP Q 2 2 O 0 ^ P '^1 S M O >• N 2 !• r* I O > 1 O NJ 2 O I P 2 P B9 2 N 01 H > m PVI 2 P P ^0 2 ^ P ^ MO w _ ^ >25 n > > 2 m M 2 O ? N m 5 o f- >o r- 1/) M p p M 5 m O ■J •'»s'*‘ i P > FSz I ^ .-in o o > -1m o p i o X >o N m 2 j • >i i ’ ■*'Cw •- ‘t i -' \ * 9 tm4. ^ r • • .1 ■M •t- ;a%T. r...*\ ' d • V ■' ■ N'* >jur m: ^ . • “ ' -V • .f \ • ‘ V '■* ■ ‘ ■ ” ’? i%. * •- -if.ill o 3D > a) C3 3 S ;d m >r- s X A Os o o o 9^ \M liiKteii -- V . V K'^ •iwr •■■'■■ ,...... r^.^-- ■ • 7:^V.‘ :•■ = • >■ <?)?!*«^ • .4 • • % \ ' ¥) z s g ^ rn S >30 N -< _ > > m z o O 70 o X I 9 ' f ' «' V* > o 70 ^ H O 13 u m u > X ^ ^ > m z 9 o » > os S* z > § S m > 30 V < _ > > m Z o O X > o o XX X m X M T3 13 O 0> > M m U41>» -< U1 H > M N ^ m U1 > 30 m vO M Hr* D^ > > Z X tt1 M M X > »• r- r M Z •< I- > ^m m m -n I H r- » > fo- M M4 X «D z M n o o o>> M U4 fS> •< %l C. C. M N M _ %4 > •• O M M Hr- C 9* Z ro C. C. O M > rv> > > U4 S < O^ O O 01 N O H o m m ^ > > r- r- I i5°5CS5 m s •< Ui m H Oi - Ol m o 70 O M O O 0^ mo -»» IUS-5K in m r- X m in > _ \H 70 13 o \D M m "*8 ?»§ m 2 M Sg§5 ^ ^ r- r- I •< < K M m < I*.c.g^ •H M H 04 in X cn ^ X ^ 88cM m m > 04 l: X X > X m X X o r 3 S t > •' X 04 o O O 03 ^ M > 04 r» •< in X > M N in X in > < 03 in M H r-> > > m I X X M x>mmr-M Z -< X m > N4 if» m in04 X M M Oom m m o Ti I m X > fv» < 04 04 04 X o o X o M O S X 04 X X O 01 M M Q 04 r» 2 Ch 09 > M Z >4 m OH m X > N4 M H r* H a* > ^ M f r* M > •< -n > ^ m > m m I 09 H C > >m H r* c -< 04 > m 3? r- m o Z 5 -1X X m Z H 04 M X "1 r Zf0C.COM > fo > > ra 01< OH O O |H4 6I°2€S m H 01 m %j i8 X _ o in X in r- 04 h49M 58ig MiM? < n» M 04 X at In o in 8m S5{ 9m f o r- M r* oM 04 04 OH M 3 > r* * 5 ’'" X X r- r- o 03 3 O > > o r«4 X X o > > 0»< < rv> M mm Oh m ” -4 I > 4> ^ - M o M m m > M o -Hi ^ M C/i o o»M M H 04 ro o* m i» M 04 < Oh m o 04 M H r- Z OH Q > 03 I 2 X X M M > X r- M > •<> X > ^ m cn X I 9 H o Q > f* m H M 2 •< 04 R^5 3^X ra H 04 M mnz sir ■-,«A • i V •-.4». .u'! ■ - ■ •« » ■ ' 03 5 X i O 8 Hrn o 04 V04 Os hO r» * *3 •V • f“ H * .■ C ,v ’ ■ ^ ... 0 ' '^S.- :rf (c2--- (41) dT^r^i K— (54) f f . f \ \ t..r jcfl: “• i • * w*^V-■■ T^r'_ (la)"*"l'* ^- I bM I?) 9(13) « 42* ^ I* 5 •fa?i* = ^ . ’ •Jf- cwr P^«SP:, M iiri • • AIMMM • I. 4« tALlMl ♦ III W JMII 9 ji^ u It • n irioi ft r>« •UMIAM «J04 » */i.^ ii miim;# Ufi ♦ V* (5^ It ' \*)l *4 Afitl V^1N> At. •a; (9») 1 f s .A 0(»r 1^—M_ wr/r/A'>yr/r/j •: S ♦ cut 4 H 1 « <51)'^ 4 H Xf. .V uvyn AS) •i(/« l“‘ I <M» («l) .'V/.*^5) ttaif c (14) ;**♦•. Ca \m < r 1 A (1) ' Iff ji iAa \ \ ^ f t (4) 1 \ *<‘W-r 14t M 1 \s 1 (5 If a j i /i)f,5: g)^ f \1 (7) •mitf t *.»•• •’ ^•. * 1 If K *> • 9 * (l«) - t a__ ^.„., OLD COUNTY RO « i 3 fUFVi^; (to } )1< Tf (I5t«s d:. (»») a (17) /71 • lit If 4k twfitr I r— *\ 1 ^ 5»U 1 (11) l\ ^ *I « h.A ^ (O) A i ‘at H 1 /^' T#» 4 9L f (70) 144 ir ^ !;U, :; coo ‘/!! ^‘^ an m 1/7 no) H4^ff ^rTTf UB) vvr : ’I. "t' S!.■‘.4fflK'- ■ -rS wK^ ■ ’ ■■ :■■ :‘vk> ••M- -’n- vt. / ~/ -'i:' '' •*'- . f.- ■ ■ ■• ■;. fo, o mM-CITYof ORONO :«RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2989_________ V'i 'v%5loif fcte-,,, ■■, i;2afe&. cJ•;^ • "f“ I >r./-.. "7vr' -■ '^V-.-.T^' • V I A RESOLUTION GRANTING A V201IANCB TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT PER SECTIONS 10.55 SDBDIVISIONS 10 - 12 AND SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 FILE #1604 WHEREAS • at*'Kenwood Cily*^Sl orotl^and legally described as follows: •;^ k7 r'm ■v: T * c;a qt; t^6 61 62 and 63, "Wallaces Addition tc the Village of Minnetonka Beach", Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has subdiv^i °ion°8^to a variance to Municipal f where no such excavationallow excavation of a ‘^^signated wetland^a^^ Sections 10.55, is normally allowed# and a cor^f-ion "*0 03 Subdivision 19 forSubdivisions 10 - 12 per Section .0 03, ^Subd^^^^i_^Subdivisions 10 - 12 ana per y..-, excavation, grading and filling in excess or within a wetland/flood fringe district. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS m 1. *} This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1604 ■ : - .'in-; m» m The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. kM The Orono Planning Commission ^^20 ^19 91 ^and°June November 19, 1990, ^as requested 17, 1991. After receiving additional Planning frim the applicant T^gainst to Commission on June 17, 1991 votea . .-^3 conditional Sir^mlt'fo^'eVca^VticroY^half acre pond within a 1.5excavation Page 1 of 6m m i ' m I ‘ . .i H ■ s nr-Hi ' CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _______- rT5|!«K7.> . . • s* ■ ..••, ^ r Mr ¥P: -;v, *• V •• V,m 5. T feii ■■,, W-' ■■iV;, acre designated wetland, with spoils disP°sal >bove the Hood plain elevation on the site, based on the following findings: The area of the wetland has b n used a| over many years. Applicant: s remove the accumulated debris ^ oeneral Sites This clean-up is considered a general improvement to the area of this wetlana The City Engineer has reviewed the project and has advifed that all stormwater and flood enoiLerinq requirements have been met so that there will be no anticipated adverse impact on bake Minnetonka. a park-like setting, and the applicant has provided suitable revegetation plan and planting schedule. The Council finds that the proposed pond ^^^the ^Lakl”asld pSnd'"and^?etentiSn''of^the natural S!!^rife‘S"itrt\“irirthe "stated of the City^^^ than revert to a manicured park like The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this rd"r.Vb!.'^%:s5!.‘,ro; Page 2 of 6 •«»f3 II fi imitth '. ■• - ■ fM-.- >i r. 'it CITY of OKONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2989 ^ nreserve a substantial pro^perty ^^^f^the^Zoning would be in keeplng with the spirit a^nd intent of the Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. StLr danger to neighboring P'°P®^H\®4t"°he proposid Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or n.ore of Council hereby grants a i^nal^use permit per Sections 10.55, Subdivision 8 and 9«nts a f f Subdivision 19, to ?ians a\\"a1:hedTs"Erhibirl ^subject to the following conditions: . I At : 1. S*!.- • . . .;• Applicant shall conform to all «"/^«“=^\^°Eng?ne^r'tnd ^rmry"b°e%rgu'ir"^^^^^^^^^ ks'trict, the DNR, and the Corps of Engineers. 2.Silt fencing and other required o ° exca\^ation andmaintained in place during the period of exca until revegetation is accomplished. 3. 4. Applicant shall adhere to the revegetation plan as proposed. Applicant shall grant a £lo«®9® ~Tl7va\^ion «\®?oSrover the entire wetland area defined by elevation ln.5, plus a 15- rd^slfr^pt^^^"^^^at Navarre Lane. The legal aescrip surveyor. No land shall be provided >?y £*'®. *PP “ea"to the applicant until alteration “xecuted by the applicant,such easement has-been properly execurea it' Page 3 of 6 L : : - 1l • *♦ * ■ ' ■ in T: ■ ^ ''J • /Ta t. • • iiati.' m S5';-J^-' K'- . CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2989_________ "i-.•j ■• fe,.’-': ■ , 5. iii* The applicant shall obtain a land alteration permit ($75.00 per current fee schedule) prior to commencement of the project. Such permit shall not be issued until the appropriate permits of other agencies are submitted to the City. Construction/excavation must be done in the winter and the outlet culvert must be sealed off during the entire construction time. Applicant shall work with the appropriate agencies (City/Minnegasco ) in restoring grades around the culvert and exposed gasline at the south end of the property Chemicals for the control of algae and aquatic vegetation within the pond shall not be allowed. Areas designated on the plan as remaining undisturbed shall be fenced off prior to grading to prevent their destruction. Applicant to execute a Developer's Agreement with the City including: a. Completion at approved time periods. Posting of security so City can step in and complete work if necessary. Payment of fees for any excessive inspections needed during the construction period, and payment of any excessive engineer review fees accumulated during the review process. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (July 22, 1992). Page 4 of 6 ♦ -5 j . ^ 4, mm ^ _ m u-' "' -•■♦ . ' ^-- •-> -rr-^•4 ' 'V* \i- CITY «rf ORONO .^-: 4 .* '>*f u:-** RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2989_________ .•>’ V'•.^- ..•, ■• - ' ■ , .-'V'.lAv •. • ‘ '■■' ■ '■ y' ■ --v' ; |W|V;.'v;:. mSiwsas RW®3:s^' Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any Authority gra’nted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 13. wm. . The undersigned applicant has read, understood a^d hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of hLse'lf, his heirs, successors and hereby o the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 22nd day of July, ATTSST: #■ ipT . • *•, Dorothy M.r iallir City Clerk 7 f^if Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner Is) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss . . COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) 'M i-: f'. ^■i ■3 J The foregoing instrument was „TlU ^iytr^"^a‘’c^t?'lier”Vf\^he City of 0 ”“?< = Sit^^corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. NOTAI^P^<^- M^mCaOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY My oomrr'lsslcn •atpim 8-12-^ IJZ^ Notary Public " -Km ■ Page 5 of 6 '.L; mi ► I— •« -r. H/•"if . ?•-. • • y' • . • • I ♦ * 0 «# * 'f. V:' - -• CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 298_9 STATEOFTiiNNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. ) on this and'^fAa^d county, ^^onailf •- r 1 the foregoing tbe oerson(s) describe ^ oviami'ted the same as r . ‘____a. af'knowle ?hr“«son(s) des^r^ the same as his (their) free act and deed. . . - -- ' -i'y V . 1 ^;^■ :5 ‘ J’: ■ :V*^P'V- ■ pm"-- -■ NOTA My commission WJirss 8-12-W ,»;■ ■».' my commission expires >• L' STATE OF MINNESOTA ) :'i COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this _1^ ) ss. O. «i. _ d„ o< a Notary^i'UDxxv, -.-wa.-.- --- known to me tuthe foregoing instrument/ pefson(s) descril^ea' in and j executed the same as his and acknowledged that he itney; (their) free act and deed. /V rTA^T PDBLI^ mM ’^i HOT«^5!S{K?-2S5»»'*tWOTAht oniiiaTY ? r.- k»*g^ MY CO] Page 6 of 6 i -wmm •F ,c 1Wli aBORML) V -, > "i-d A kt wmrnm •s j|i||j||^g||j^ •;. -1 1 1 1 > -. ■ ♦ ■ i ■ ’ -*^t • < ' • '■; __^ -1,-m * V t ' « .fc 3^> S2ri.. •* r-.'.'.j iiii m ">■ i 'y /fes ^>^• '-•■■: *:v;v^: r.s * .Q> »> V o'^V C r; ..ff: M!I* 'f rfflln sif^»:• Mj * f 5«f ] r mm m^u-f [*>/^, ^ «‘’r-'. m •U I© ■^•7. ! »>_ ^ l\ i.^ X \ ^ \ 1 • j V :»TqTMX3 6863 NoiimosaH <1.r v^" *f=— •^n* X RESOLUTION #2989 '• > V*/•. •/ fesSS STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO ) ) ) ) ) > i ■4- I Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk of the City of Orono, Hennepin ‘ County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Orono with the original record of such resolution in the Minutes of the proceedings of said City Council at a meeting of sa\ '-ty Council held on ________July 22. _________. 19^2____. and tV.'. u*.-* same is a true and correct copy of said resolution was duly wl<.j?ttd by said City Council at said meeting. .'■t '4 ••rv: In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this v"* , day of August 19 91 T ■ yfiSaru/SafS ‘ % >» ■. . . • . xl akrf^-r ■; ■ 'KSEAD m •X allin. City Clerk ..•it '■i • ■:y^. * :-u mM ■A- \ ■ . «»« <««■• •» '.r.: -4 X- Sp f‘ >.n/ y ...u, •• t --* * • ri • >- ^ f ■ f «• • • » f ff- ^ •0 - ft * H M • mlt • • :A • VM j a#--;' ,:w 'nr'^' ¥CiW|{|f» t FLOHAGB AND COHSBRVATION BASEMENT AND WAIVER OP DAMAGES THIS INDENTURE, made and entered into this 2nd day of December_ _ 19 91# by and between Lynn D. Rood & Clair T. Rood, husband and its heirs# asilgns# and successors [hereinafter collectively i-^f^rred to as the Grantor(s)] and the City of Orono, its successors and assigns# a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the Grantee). WITNESSETH, Grantor(s)# for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1#00) and other valuable consideration# hereby covenant, grant# gift# quit claim and convey to grantee the right to restrict and grantor(s) agree to limit and preclude the use# improvement and development# under the conditions and covenants herein contained# the following described Land in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota. A flowage and conservation easement over those parts of Lots 54# 55 and 56# "Wallaces Addition to the Village of Minnetonka Beach" described as follows: Ppfp Commencing at the most easterly corner of said Lot 56; thence on an assumed bearing of North 39 degrees 11 minutes 30 seconds West along the Northeasterly line of said Lot 56 a distance of 212 feet to the point of beginning of the easement being described; thence South 13 degrees West 67 feet; thence South 38 degrees East 70 feet; thence South 17 degrees West 96 feet to "Point A"; thence South 43 degrees West 30 feet; thence South 88 degrees West 110 feet; thence North 52 degrees West 97 feet; thence North 36 degrees West 125 feet; thence North 8 degrees West 65 feet; thence North 12 degrees East to the Northwesterly line of said Lot 56; thence Northeasterly along said Northwesterly line to the most Northerly corner of said Lot 56; thence South 39 degrees 11 minutes 30 seconds East along said Northeasterly line to the point of beginning. iSI Also# over a strip of land 15 feet wide lying 7.5 feet on each side of a line drawn from said "Point A" to a point on the southeasterly line of said Lot 56 distant 120 feet Southwesterly from said most Easterly corner of Lot 56. as follows: 1. Grantor(s) hereby covenant and agree(s): A. NO structures shall be constructed# erected# or placed upon, above# or beneath the Land including without limitation# fences# fireplaces# steps# docks# oiers# hardcover or roads of any nature whatsoever# or any other structure or improvement inconsistent with the natural state of the Land. B. No trees# shrubs or other vegetation shall be destroyed# cut or removed from the Land except as authorized by written consent of Grantee. mm. ' f Jt !J>» ' ^^|pS C. No earth, loam, peat, gravel, soil or any other natural material or substance shall be moved or removed from the Land and there shall be no dredging or excavation of any nature whatsoever or any change of the topography of the Land without the written consent of Grantee. D. No soil, sand, gravel or other substance or material as landfill shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Land and no waste, trash or garbage shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Land. E. No use shall be made of the Land except uses, if any, which will not change or alter the natural condition of the Land, and no use which would tend to change the drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion control, soil conservation, fish and wildlife habitat characteristics shall be made of the Land or the water situated thereon. liili r-l; 4 F. Grantee may enter upon the Land for the purposes of inspection and enforcement of the covenants contained herein and to cause to be removed from the Land without any liability any structures, uses, materials, substances, or unnatural matter inconsistent with the covenants contained herein and the natural state of the Land. 2. Grantor(s) hereby grant, gift, quit claim and convey to Grantee a perpetual flowage easement and right and privilege to trespass with water over and upon any or all of the Land. 3. Grantor(s) herein do hereby remiss, release, acquit and forever discharge, forever, the Grantee and any and all of its officers and employees of and from any and all claims, demands or causes of action of any kind or nature whatsoever which may arise or accrue by virtue of any flowage or trespass with water within terms of these agree ments . In addition to any other remedy the Grantee may have, the covenants and restrictions contained herein may be enforced by injunction. Grantor(s) do not intend that the public should have any interest in the above land by virtue of this indenture or otherwise, except as hereinabove set forth. I- • b'The Grantor(s) herein certify that the land herein described are free and clear of all encumbrances except: . • •' ■•vis All provisions hereof shall run with the land and shall extend to and bind the heirs, successors, representatives, grantees or assigns of the respective parties hereto. - rW '■■y-. ■ , - mmmm . V r lia 1 .. r*'" \ -' * \ 'MM L*#- ill STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS. f'-' '*.V- • ■ ■•■ • • .)ai< Dece^^btr . 19^, before me personallyOn this gay oz^]f-----J. * u=;f^ to me known to appeared ^V"" ^ f^ed in and signed the foregoing iLt5^Int!°2nd\cknowledge that they executed same as their free ••eV act and deed. S. VEE u^i.A'SSSk?-. m5»^a^hb ^nwin county My oomnStitofl «ip*r«» 8-12-90 NOTARY PUBLIC r ** '.r/'mm V r. STATE DEED TAX DUE .”EREON:V, - I This Instrument was drafted by: 4^ POPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH & KAUFMAN, LTD. 3300 Finer Jaffray Tower Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 333-4800 Mmi ;v sfc- ■ V-:. msm- 3:Ai ZPLV783(2) . •/' • A4....T' \ Wm-•^. ■ liMil »:*! '■ V t.' * v;' ^.•;' - ■ .* ;1 T ,'; mm W-^m ii9 ^ ^; *M’Ss- ?. .V. ■ ""mi-: vliiSiSB I* sv mmm j4>J. u‘. . r\ ^ • m •? '• :V ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 22r 1991 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: (#5)ZONING FILE #1604-CXAIR ROOD nni tz iteNWOOD wax VARIANCE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-RESOLUTION #2989 Clair Rood was present. Bernhardson provided a brief statement explaining the basis for Rood's application, noting that the Planning Comission had «co^tnded '^'^pproval. He informed Council /la""xng commission also recommended that '«• the existing pillars on his property to 3*5 for a separate height Variance. Bernhardson f issue for Council's consideration involves the legal combination of the parcels owned by Mr. Rood. Gaffron explained that the pillars, retaining walls and constLute an accessory use and are located on lots that have no principal structure. Goetten indicated that, in her opinion, the Ordinance requiring a principal structure with an accessory st.uctur pertains more to structures such as docks, barns, garages, etc. She did not see the need to require a lot combination in Mr. Rood's case. Jabbour agreed with Goetten that a lot combination is not necessary. Mr. Rood stated that at some point in the future, he would like to build a house on lots 54 and 55, but that he is nor yet prepared to submit a subdivision appl-"nation. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2989, approving a Variance and Permit for excavation within a wetland area, as amenaed to omit Condition #11 pertaining to legal combination of the rour parce s owned by the applicant. All voted aye. Motion passed. m. mmB for Trinity kmm (#6)ZONING FILE #1646-TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH 2060 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-RESOLUTION #2990 Jerry Jones, an authorized representative Lutheran Church was present. i Bernhardson advised thit the applicant Ha Conditional Use Permit for a church use in conjunction with the construction of a detached garage. He informed Council th Planning Commission had recommended approval. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution #2990. granting a Conditional Use Permit for t e - 6 - .-.-./I'v . ,■ a :.f . f . \ m i' %?■ 1 pa mil: . ■ ••'Vt' ‘ -ii. Ar- rnWInf ^*1**™!**”^'^ t'*r-' " *1.f- ;iJ^-'^^•■''*" ■.*■■• I r .'.,'V-*-.^ ■■ ■ v«->', l»? • V.-'' - ,7 . ■ 77 " \\:', ;•; .--7 *v'! V 'J^'. " CLAIR T, ROOD / 2215 mn-^OOD WAY / WAYZATA, MN_55391-9700 ’'.-'I*:##; ■■■^' ..• ,V July 15, 1991 city of Orono P. O. Box 66 Cr^ptal Bay, MN Dear Zoning Administrator; mm in regards to your letter dated July 2, 1991, zoning file #1604. I am perfectly willing to follow staff recommendations 1 tnrough 5. However I have a problem with #6 where it says applicant shall legally combine the four tax parcels upon which the project will take place. m MS -rn'm tT'-i ■ .:s The project as I see it only takes place on lots 54, 55 & 56. "iLT^iia\:YvricL°Jot!“f^ouS ITnTllTioTle to toi-.a on which is 2-1/2 acres. I certainly would object to combining my current homestead (which is on lots 66, 67 & 68) with these other lots. I see no need for that type of action. My clean-up work and ponding is to be entirely with-in the boundaries of lots 54, 55 & 56. •T >■mm Once again I would reiterate my concerns for the current state of this wetland. '•,r f’,'A' V. ' ■V-Av;:''S 'M wm. •i'iY P'Yi'fevi Yi 1. ^'-2. The gas line is still exposed on the south end of this property Tires, car body parts, tin cans and litter still remain within the boundaries of this wetland. 3.Brush and creosote soaked railroad ties continue to appear on the north end of the property as it appears to be an idea dumping site for passersby and the railroad. ^ * 4. 5. which has overgrown the entire wetland. I am also concerned about erosion on the south erui of the property Without retaining walls and proper grading, the bank continues to wash into the wetland. \ .’J • •• -” r -■ • 4 ., I . Jk- :-4 • rr.- •• .'•Page Two July 15, 1991 aBfc-:■■ I have no problem waiting until winter to excavate the pond, however I would deem it necessary to build the retaining wal s as soon as the council approves this permit.mgsm- ;. . ‘ .s ^ i r* t. Thanking you, A- r--^^ Clair T. Rood I V /■ r*-./M i’M' . pifiwaw*sii * • ^ »•> • >■ '■ •. »■ n W.'. i i,-. . y^.v* - ■5^.« * v-V^' '‘ ’ i 'r^ '1 ■•>^■: ttfi-: • a L* ^ liiiifeitt. fSfT E tV*^J »■. <'Tl1U w. mv’v-■ . l’.'.. ■■ rniMmm •'•tv; ■h Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator April 15, 1992 #1730 Greg Malik, 3060 Sixth Avenue North - Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-IB, Rural Residential Zoning District, 2 acre minimum » Pertinent Ordinances -* Section 11.03, Definition 66 (B) - Class II Subdivision. Application involves two buildable lots, dedication of drainage and utility easements and dedication of County right-of-way. Class II subdivision shall be in the form of a plat. Section 10.28 - RR-IB, Single family rural residential district standards. Total lot area = 6.04 acres Lot 1 =» 3.46 acres (.62 wet, 2.84 dry) Lot 2=2 acres dry Outlet A to serve as shared drive for Lots 1 and 2. Xiis't of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Weekman Memo E - Septic Plan - Lot 2 P - Septic Plan - Lot 1 G - Preliminary Plan Description of Request mm Xf.c!The applicant proposes a two-lot division of the former Johnson homestead property. The existing access shall be removed and a shared driveway installed along the east lot line of Lot 2. The steep topography and stand of mature evergreen trees along the west side of lot restrict driveway construction. It is the desire of the applicant to provide as much privacy or natural screening as possible to the County property immediately to the west. The County stores trees and cuts these trees on site for firewood. Both lots will achieve access via Outlet A. Each lot meets the required width of 200' at the 50* setback line. i '■ ' I # m . s:' -1 ?■: r . AV-isklUfeiii ' .-' ‘.>1 < Zoning File #1730 April 15, 1992 Page 2 rv >,;■■'•'••I ■■•■ ''''J Hennepin County Department of Transportation has been asked to review the proposed subdivision. Their written report has not been received as of this writing but staff has been in contact with the inspection staff to confirm that they have approved the relocation of the shared drive and ask that the existing drive be removed at the time of the installation of the shared drive. The County will not approve two curb cuts to this property. ,4* Septic Review '>^1 r*'' i^r; Please review Exhibits D, E, and F. Both staff and the on site evaluator were advised that the existing house on Lot 2 was to be removed upon final plat approval. Septic testing has been based on the removal of the existing wells on the site. Staff has since been advised by applicant that he plans to live in the existing residence during the construction of a new residence on Lot 1. Review Exhibit E, the shared drive, Outlot A, encroaches the existing septic system that serves the residence on Lot 2. Malik has advised staff that he would extend the existing drive serving Lot 2 to the north lot line providing temporary access to the building site. If it is the applicant's intent to sell the existing house with Lot 2, at the time of the construction of the shared drive applicant must abandon the existing septic system and advise how future buyer is to be advised of need for new septic system and well. Applicant must provide direction to the City concerning his future plans for the existing residence on Lot 2. His options are as follows: A.Prior to final plat approval, remove existing residence and abandon two wells on property and sell as undeveloped lot. B. V.:'. ,4m, Temporary use of existing residence during construction of new residence on Lot 1 or if existing residence to remain on Lot 2 and to be sold as is. The City will require a Developer's Agreement and Letter of Credit ensuring installation of shared drive and abandonment of two wells on Lot 2 at the time of the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the new construction. Applicant must provide written documentation to be filed on Chain of Title advising future buyer of Lot 2 that existing structure is not legally habitable and of the need to either remove said structure or provide new well and septic system to serve existing residence. •'•V mm l^p Hjr mm M- ■ -3^ % i ■ /A: >1. '4 j ' i —V. r/ •••m • i->- '. '-•f^. ,v-,.. j* =v ^ ^ .Vy *i^'- aV ;^3 m: p'', ,kS!MP5‘ Zoning File #1730 April 15, 1992 Page 3 I .. *■It should also be noted that the existing residence does not meet required 30' setback from east lot line and is shown at 25'. Any future expansion to the north side of existing residence would require City approval. As the City has no standards foi private driveway outlets, outlet could be redesignated to a 25' width and structure would meet the required side yard setback of 30'. 'X ■ • ■ staff Recommendation To approve the Class II subdivision application of Greg Malik for the property located at 3060 Sixth Avenue North finding that all standards of the RR-IB zoning district and on site septic code have been satisfied, subject to the following conditions: 1. 1 Applicant to execute a Flowage and Conservation Easement over designated wetland within northern portions of Lot 1. M Dedication of drainage and utility easements 10' wide along the perimeter property line and 5' along shared lot line. Dedication of right-of-way for County Road 6. The City to limit dedication to 40'. The County will ask for a 50' dedication. '■■ ■ -V'. ■ * -li , f . . Based on applicant's determinations regarding status of existing "'esidence structure on Lot 2, the City will ask for a Developer's Agreement and Letter of Credit to ensure that required improvements are completed. 5.Although the City has no setback standards for driveways adjacent to lot lines, the City will ask that the actual traveled drive stay as close to the western boundaries of the road outlot. y-'ij 6. ’Tim;:: ■ viSWiei Applicant to resolve location of pipe and spigot placed to west side of east lot line of Outlot A. If east property owner is responsible, then owner should be allowed to relocate within his property. The outlet pipe is located within road outlot and may create problems during construction of private drive. mi ■ .. -V-’f.' yy ■ Vmf*'' ’-Vn l-^lt i::'.: m mm'-: Psl <«..* • ■ L- ■4 " • m r iL 1 1 • ^ 'L- ... . 1 I . H I r ^ —;r~ m|X **^ /BBTi^PLICATIOH- [,■■ CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIYIS^CSgi^PPLI PROPERTY LOCATION ^ ^ ““ •* / V - i j- tS ■ L-r^-' r- '-1••^ « ‘ 3L /7 i •If. site Address j^/y^ % Z3lZ&iA3^^jCCO 3 Please check one - Property abstract or _ _ torrens? Attach legal descripticn to application / APPLICANT Name ( Address Phone (home) ^ ^ _ _ _ Phone (work) ,’^4/S \ X ^JJ^ZAS ^£fJt City P^aJ OWNER (if different than applicant) ■ ^, Name Phone (home) Phone (work)/i4v^ 'W 'tv-;.' Address: at ir more than one} Zip: (attach XTst EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels / Development Size <,:is Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land CITY Of OROHO flRAt^CE OFFICE 1350200000 Acres Total, all parcels jOiAL 01 CEt^/vT'C: A/‘ A?:*A'?*-* fyti Present Use (check) ACUResidential; no. of unit.^y... Other (specify)___________irinnvu c,)n iV iJV^V/ • vv 7*: <VI vT • vv im-YOU Present Zoning District 1^233130 cool l<Vl lOc- 03/30, PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) YS& Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites;/ / .'■r mm Existing Units New Units Total Units ■V i’.- \ . mmfeSV Proposed Gross Density; Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use; (check) /Units per Acres •• .V\ yes Residential Other (specify) o * V-nj ^ikr' " • • 4» • tx. MIHIMPM MATERIAL MBCBSSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMIHARY APPLICATION 1. Completed Application Form ^ ^ ^ Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Suirvey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). ^ ^ ^ XAs an addendum to this applicationr please attach a separate list or any other persons you wish notified of this application. 3. 4. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ __Date 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ *_ _ _ _ Date- - - - - - - - - - FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement $200.00 300.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision)300.00 E>-' ^Preliminary Review (Class III & all non-residential) 325.00 + 25.00/Lot ^inal Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 175.00 Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Pinal Subdivision Application 150.00 100.00 The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information reguired or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals ..'ito the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Plan^ 7 Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. AppI^ -i; is must be present at all scheauled review meetings of the Planning Coiiwij ^ on and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ■ r.I 111 Jr ^ •; L ,Ija • . •■ r I •.-I .’IV' ..••>• ./-*:-J I •• •«» ^ 5 S ^ iHU t ^ s za Si s iMiiliii|[!|i i =|Sid ifg 22S •••••5f»555-rr= J??5?siiiiiii“?|j=||a3S53p5i5a IIISii8!|gi;;ig3||;i fi!*a5Sis*3ICoZSv. Sccr 55S ^ *4 ■ • -4 ^ • • • •» *5I3il!Slii|fg^----‘ * • #•. >«. •--‘Ir *• - • / JHIIII h Ihi I III ?!p|lHf|fc^iiiiiiii§i|||i:||i: |: |: i§9!i§S§§ 5555a*255as556g||||a||£fgf£||i|^ 2ji5|s iiiii iiifilil I ||f||s BisiS iS5|f=*““ lliiiiilitllii • * *»" 3mM » at M * • 31 ^ SIS s {S s r* ,.,.1. .l!'T'T"T''4 ‘®T“4 ‘'-f'-lJl-iilJ«.lwlHlJilhta^ li^iisillfi Ijsifil*■ •• •* A.A ;»o, -Si **• } * • . w •*’. -i*.- • »• •'• *; ’r.s »* *1m '' ^ 1k^-* % J . ^ ^'V "t -i* •. -.5^, ■* mi m iB<4i§a§^.gfHArs n?»;si rau 2fc«ag*5«gi5|53r*g5^|BSf IJB s * ■ ■ * sjs X X z X *****j*»3 X a z *•« a» 3B ;b a««.«i. ii||55 sj5n«il|Sii?^i55;i(i55;d5i|| t»S IS5 If §1 8 i ss §§ jdsss -'i •* w» -•M W»M \ fe|S|ri|f|iJgB8gsIS 8 8 tt s|c s 8 r as s s ^ 888 ■■StassiiagiigSaaSsi 5; i I slis^ i I22SI Jiiiiii Ifij •... ' : . A*. /Ann 3- - • - n ■ . ••. aSLiwS: S5'i55r.“. Fv*^.7 ( / ■ . . :•'% . s gDttf tf kr . S: «..• * 'VK ;-V Jl^lg ■ g^ji§§- iiiPlIIr«?li Mtifnj I9§| fifilIssss Iflllllll“ naaaae ? 3 tJ I8f| riatia i!5i?8 t i: llili s s s s •■ aaaaa iillBaaa Hi ill i I S ? I«2i § I ssssaaaa aauat; 5 t •fiSidlgll 88aa -• •• V. ;a a a a ; kj I ifti — «s» 8 SB 3 tf i i il 2 m CM ill i|i|i|ii|iiliili|l r liiliiifiii|i| li Sis I: aaaj t: aaa. fc-faaaq'iaaat^i-jat;.- aaSSaaa5535aaS§M . 1 - Vi t--!ii!fid!fij|iiSlii||g|||l||li|r|||I 8 S I f Hip I’ ^ w « 8888a8S illli fill :»»»S g 8 382 yaaavaaaaaaaaat^a: aSuSaaSaM^IS^nS?2S2isisi22i5p{5aai\U:5i ------- ^ - - - « - ^ ;V t t i M t t^8 l3 iC M ^8 # X ^ __ lllfpl 5n 5 s ^ IIS a 8 8 r« Jl!l? 5:j iUl ■.rrfrr^- '• -V- V -m mM Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager April 14, 1992 Subject: Subdivision #1730, Gregg D. Malik - Septic Review I have reviewed the existing and proposed septic system information for this property and would make the following comments. LOT 1 Soil testing and design has been completed for a five bedroom home. Both primary and alternate drainfield sites are mounds and meet all setbacks. The alternate mound site, however, is on a 7% slope which requies a variance from the septic code and an interceptor drain is recommended to divert up-slope drainage. The soil testing and system design have been app.roved for both sites. LOT 2 The existing septic system consists of two septic tanks with unknown volume and a small drainfield also of unknown size. The septic system was inspected on April 13, 1992 with the septic report indicating that the drainfield was saturated and discharging slightly to the surface and the septic tanks required pumping. The system is not considered to be failing at this time, however it has a high potential for future failure. Soil testing and septic design have been completed for this lot indicating primary and alternate drainfield sites for a new five bedroom residence. Both septic sites for Lot 2 have been conditionally approved if the two existing wells in this parcel are abandoned. An old well currently not in use must be properly abandoned now and the well serving the existing residence must be abandoned prior to the issuance of a building permit. Access to Lot 1 via Outlot A encroaches over a large portion of the existing drainfield. When the access road is constructed through Outlot A, the existing septic system must be abandoned. The existing residence may be occupied if soil testing is approved indicating two available septic sites for the existing Residence. SUMMARY Based on the above information, I would recommend approval of the proposed subdivision provided that the existing septic system in Lot 2 be abandoned when the access road Outlot A is constructed and that both existing wells in Lot 2 be abandoned prior to the issuance of a building permit for Lot 2. m /?■ b'v ' 'gaiM i.’ ■ ^P^y- - ; .'.bir; )»• fH ■ ■■ 4.‘i»' - • ^7-'J- - •s;r f i, - -•■'■••‘S \ y\ i^- jiAj >:j /' u(4^ t ? ' ‘■r f -i'. ■4-4 ■■ . -.mmm I .y V,-; f i*li®i*=-j SM.r4>^4,--i^;.'-■.■■••;i''4 •.•■■. -'r ■ ,- 8o s. X y y 7F h / s . •*> 1*r") fS js (/ 0^ ^itr / V' 3<?_S. ’■> f y ■ V-i -; ®-y - W' 'M:. I * ft ■®'- lilyar;>* 5ti-: 1^.; iililfii M ■••: ■ '., i§5 ■4r-y O -C3 y ;prt» s. 0» a» j* *D ?; «• V t?v 1^? > ♦ r,: O V S’\\ " :,v^ ■- 7-- mm 3. ■tv;->■ %mmmmmM r "M wm Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator if J’ From Dates Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth^ Building & Zoning Administrator April 10, 1992 #1698 Jim Rivers, 1442 Shoreline Drive - After the Fact Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing > > V m “i List of Exhibits A - Staff Memo 4/11/91 Meeting B - Planning Commission Action Notice C - Applicant's Original Statement D - Applicant's Addendum E - Floor Plan of Addition - 1976 F - Staff Sketch G - Amended Proposal H - Planning Commission Minutes of 11/18/91 Meeting . ^ '. • ; . Status of Application m i b . - At the November 18, 1991 meeting of the Planning Commission, applicant requested the tabling of his application providing him additional time to develop an amended plan which would provide for a reduction in hardcover to offset 318 s.f. of hardcover within the 0- 75'. Planning Commission members asked that the amended plan designate the final approved right-of-way for County Ro<?.d 15 as it impacts the residential property. Review Exhibit G. Right-of-way adjacent to residential is at 55' and right-of-way adjacent to commercial is at 47'. Review of After-the-Fact Application The multiple variance application involves hardcover and setback variances with the 0—75' setback for a three season porch that was added to the principal structure sometime after 1976. The applicant's addendum Exhibit C advises that the three season porch was originally constructed as a deck and converted in later days. As already noted in the earlier packets, the building permit in 1976 and the floor plan Exhibit E specifically noted no approvals for a deck as the original 1976 applicition limited the improvements to tiie addition to the house. - ■ 1 liliiiiiAiiiit'Vii** pf' . " ' -^♦'*'7 -.yn- ■; ■ >; tv Zoning File #1698 April 10, 1992 Page 2 . /i Review of Amended Proposal Review Exhibit G. Applicant proposes the installation of a 6' wide grassed area adjacent to the County Road to offset the additional 318 s.f. of hardcover within the 0-75' setback area. The majority of the 75-250' setback area of this property is occupied by a gravel parking lot. The City has approved a conditional use permit for this use with the marina license reviews each year to allow for overflow parking during the summer months. Although applicant's addendum. Exhibit D, suggests credit for a 570 s.f. grassed area, in reality there is only 240 s.f. of grassed area on the subject property. Note lot line has been shown as it intersects the County Road at the shared curb cut to both residential properties. Hardship Statement s®0 Please review applicant's hardship statement found in applicant’s original comments, Exhibit C. Options of Action Approval. To approve as proposed or as amended by the Planning Commission subject to the findings and hardships set forth by applicant or Hi ■»' • ^ Denial. The Planning Commission's recommendation should include a deadline for removal of structure, will it be a complete removal or partial removal? If it is to be a complete removal, applicant shall be allowed at a minimum a stairs as approved in 1976 permit. »r. v A tLA ' .A ’ i ‘ :: , «t, iJLAfelta. "*^«H I 1.^ ■J ■ ^ Tl^ Chairman Kelley and Planning Conunission Members Mayor Peterson ^nd City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator November 12, 1991 r -i’-'. ^m-- : ':#1698 Jim Rivers, 1442 Shoreline Drive - After-the-Fact Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances ^ 1. tv Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (B) - Lakeshore setback variance. Required * 75* V, vj. •;<! •C- -1'.’ Existing » 22* Variance setback * Proposed * 9* Variance * 66* or 88% 53* or 70.6%■ 'i *-l . Section 10.2, Subd. 2 - Hardcover variance within 0-75' lakeshore setback area. 0-75* lakeshore area *= 3,750 s.f. *-l Allowed « 0 s.f. Approved or existing = 1,439.01 s.f. Additional hardcover = 318 s.f. (21.6 x 15.6) or 8.48% Total hardcover within 0-75' setback area * 1,757.01 s.f. or 46.8% Note 0-75' setback area has not been included oh Brown's Bay side as this portion of the property was rezoned to B-2 in 1983 and contains B-2 commercial improvements. In addition, the majority of the 0-75' setback area from Brown's Bay is occupied by County roadbed. Section 10.23, Subd. 6 (B) - Side setback variance required ^2. Required « 30* Proposed right side “14' Variance setback * 16' or 53% Proposed left side “20' Variance « 10* or 33% In 1976 the property was zoned B-2. Side setback at that time was only 10*. The property was rezoned in 1983 to LR-IA. Side setback for new construction is 30*. i Zoning File #1698 November 12, 1991 Page 2 mrnm^Sii I*..!/ List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Applicant's Addendum C - Plat Map D - Property Owners List E - Hardcover Fact Sheet Submitted by Applicant F - Survey Submitted by Applicant G - Staff Sketch H - Building Permit Application 11/22/76 I - Site Plan Submitted with Building Permit Application J - Council Minutes 10/25/76 K - Floor Plan for Addition L - Inspection Notice 9/16/91 ■■ ;r.' Description of Request Please refer to Exhibit B, The applicant advises that in 1976 with the issuance of a building permit, a wood deck was also included with the new construction- In addition, Mr. Rivers notes that in the mid-80's the City was involved with the re roofing of the structure and never noted the deck addition. Rivers notes the deck has existed on the property for approximately 15 years. The Building Inspector has advised that it would not be part of the normal review procedure in issuing re-roofing permits to review for a legal addition to a structure. Mr. Oman advised that he remembers the re-roofing very well as it was being done without the benefit of a building permit. Staff would ask Planning Commission members to review Exhibits F, H and K. Note Exhibit F, survey submitted by applicant dated December 1980, does not show the 3-season porch addition. Review Exhibit H, building permit application for approved lakeside construction. Note application specifically says no deck approved. Review Exhibit K, note the Inspector has specifically noted need for access stairs where existing deck is located. Applicant should advise if the original construction involved a deck area. The current structure is classified now as a 3-season porch. Was the structure originally a deck converted to a 3- season porch? Hardship Statement ^ The only additional comments of applicant are found in Exhibit B which reads as follows: "My hardship is in being asked to remove something that has existed and I have used for 15 years." It should be noted that the Building Inspection Department was asked to comment on the new construction on the Rivers' residential property by a nearby property owner who is -ilso dealing with similar lakeshore controls. In reviewing the files, the Inspectors noted no official approvals for construction of lakeside 3-season porch. j V . ♦. %r. " i •.' :^-, '*' •V--. CITY OF OROHO P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1698 55323 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice: 11/26/91 ■*, fy-TO:Jim Rivers 1442 Shoreline Drive Orono, MN 55391 COPIES TO TYPE OF APPLICATION: After-the-Fact Variance DATE OF MEETING: 11/18/91 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against Planning Ccmlssion recommends the following: The Planning Commission recommended tabling the application providing applicant with additional time to submit an amended plan showing a hardcover reduction on the property. In addition, the Planning Commission asked to see the current right-of-way allowance for County Road 15 as it Impacts this property. The amended plan should show all existing improvements and proposed areas for removal. Please contact staff if you wish to schedule a meeting prior to developing your amended improvement plan. .-'■.Ss The next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, January 21, 1992. All applications scheduled for review at that meeting have a deadline for submittals of Thursday, January 2, 1992. The deadline for the February 18, 1992 meeting of the Planning Commission is Monday, February 3, 1992. iCB IsvKi:. .»• S; > ■<. V.'. v; y,: : , ‘ ■•; ■'/. 'v’' , m-'-. CM I mmmm- m »f m '■i .. wmm m ... r.--vr-.:r;v r - •- ^ • ‘, * 'i&s ■ ' ' ' III I rtn ifTi '^1 .T9^ ' 4 • mm 7/tl *• ^ , jv u ?n ../• James P. Rivers 1442 Shoreline Drive Wayzata. MN 55391 O (S •' v*r- . ‘V ^*1 ** J/'*'•', ’i. ,i* ' i V ■• I**.'4 ' W*1 September 30.1991 ; ■ . V *» I *• *• ••••> > - ■v'*^'' - — ' .'a: City of Orono RE: Variance Application for Existing Wood Decks at 1440 and 1442 Shoreline Drive: ■ -•p •.-. -V- ;' :.-' ■•> 00-■1 • ■fj In 1975, I purchased the property at 1440 and 1442 Shoreline Drive In the City of Orono from James D. McMahan. I applied for and received from the City of Orono a permit to remove an existing restaurant building and to add an addition to foe house at 1442 Shoreline Drive. During the construction of the addition, a wood deck was also constructed. As far as I know, the city inspected this addition and deck. During the mid 80’s, the city Inspected this house when a new roof was put on. Up to now, nothing has ever been said about the addition or deck on this house and so therefore for the last 15 years, I was not aware there was a problem. • *f . . H }■ The house at 1440 Shoreline Drive had an existing stone patio behind it. During 1978, this existing stone patio was taken up and replaced wltf^i a wood deck. I do not know when this stone patio was built, but do know it was there in 1 972 when I first came to this property. wm My hardship Is in being asked to remove something that has existed and I have used for 15 years. Sini erely 1 ■V f • <9 % * »• . M- %V • • ■ *• #, ‘••■A-.;.**/: .-r . < ■ •s* * *^ mm % • - , :• ■ r r.:K0^ - *><■' < A- »v * * •' V'• N A. I’ .• ?• 'A V . , *• • .r »' # . t Inf • :- ‘’ ■ .. . -1 • . , . • .«.''' ■ V.'.'’v^.■: •, ■ «»V i I *v , ,y'U - . - ; •‘a>- ■ ^.-: ;^*-4 .. ' • . A-' ^ . ■ * ■ i p > V - •i . • •'->'■••■• . ’■■ ‘ '. ••• ‘A.-. t .'■"T. .i^ Jim Rivers 1442 Shoreline Drive Wayzata. MN 55391 r r. e>^ » k - ^ :MafCh 31,1992 :,' v?4'®i£SW'^ '* » ■ : ’' ■ ■ -■ • ' 4# Ms. Jeanne Mabusth CityofOrono . I mar 31 1932 *'i 'Jl trf. P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 f'i- »■; K;'.:: Dear Jeanne: ’’■’v3ji .A ifcii ' /■ I .* .**'■ / I would like to make a proposal to Orono that will allow me to keep the deck on my , v house. I wi‘‘plant a grass strip across the front of the property. This grass strip will be .'v ■■ a continuation of the grass in front of the marina. The width will be six feet and be constructed of treated timbers on the front and back edge. The access to County 15 is twenty feet wide. The existing wood deck Is four hundred and forty-seven square feet. The grass strip will equal about five hundred and seventy square feet This will give a reduction of the existing hard cover. ■ :Sinberely,■vJ'- r. ♦*. :'4' River^ 0 * •vP ■ r ■ - r' r:ff 4 i: , . A^. ■ f -«* . . . V A' * , •* u • . s ;- r r:-' * •» ■■. # ■ rr • t »!■< i,» / ■ m ^Jk*- r^'vx-i ■-••*•••■ • '■ ■ > r ■»• • V • ;v ' ; ,V’ ^ ■.J . H- . -.t. ’i' ■■‘.•• , . ’ ,r . >>>••. . •.' t* •'•• ^ ’y ■>"•* ' 'tfvV . ‘ ••* : •» . ** I f - • «>. V- " • • . / ■--.Ai . . r - •' * : . '* • • •“• ' ^ '••.-.:V-'’ MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER IS* 1991 "v V (#3) #1697 JIM RIVERS, 1440 SHORELINE DRIVE - AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 8:15-8:27 P.M. A' - The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Jim and Mary Rivers were present for this application. ^ .• fi't Mabusth explained this application Involves the after-the-fact construction of a deck placed over existing stone patio in 1978. She noted that permits were Issueo for the construction of the addition and the shed at the same time as the deck was constructed. Rivers noted the stone patio was there directly below the current deck He didn't realize the permit had been issued for the addition and shod. He Indicated there used to be a concrete boat road to the residence which has been removed. Mabusth noted that all three parcels owned by the applicants were used commercially In the past. Chair Kelley asked the owners why they felt the application was before the Commission at this time. Rivers noted that his neighbor had done extensive remodeling and then wanted a deck which was denied, so the neighbor indicated that the Rivers had been allowed their deck, which triggered th app1ication. Johnson asked If a condition of approval be that no Intensification or replacement of the deck be allowed. Mabusth noted that had been done in the past. to remain, subject to no Intensification or replacement of the structure be allowed. Ayes 5, nays 0. ■ ■I : : ■ L (#4) #1698 JIM RIVERS, 1440 SHORELINE DRIVE - /^PTEr-XHE-FACT VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 8:28-8:32 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Jim and Mary Rivers were present for this application. Mabusth noted that a variance was granted In |;976 for an addition to the existing residence which did not include the addition of a deck. ■'•'j • ;♦ ■ MINUTES OF THE ORONO I'^LANNINQ COMMISSION MEETINO OF NOVEM8IR 48f 4ifi #1698 - CONT. i* \ \ Rowlett© noted that the plans specifically stated that they do not include approval of a deck. Bellows clarified that the structure Is actually a three season porch. Rivers reviewed that the deck was added when the a-JdItlon was built. He stated that Jacobs, the Inspector, reviewed the addition and noted the dock but felt that because of the exit through the patio doors, some sort of access would have to be allowed to remain. Rowlette confirmed that pc'tio doors were approved on the plan leading to an approved staircase. Johnson reviewed that the d^ck was added then late.* became a three season porch. Rivers noted there Is a big cottonwood near the deck. He stated that the porch Is not heated and Is actually portable as the screen panels can be removed. Bellows reiterated that the plans state "no lakeside deck shown". Rowlette concurred and noted that the deck Is sitting right on top of the water. Rivers asked if they returned with a plan to reduce hardcover on the property, would the Commission consider allowing the deck to remain? Mabusth reminded the Commission that the applicants are obliged to maintain parking area within the street yards per a prev.ous condition of approval. Chair Kelley stated the applicants should return with a plan and he noted that he would also like to see a plat of the current right-of-way allowances for that area. It was moved by Chair Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to table Application #1698 for Jim Rivers of 1440 Shoreline Drive, to allow applicant time to submit a plan for hardcover reduction on the property. Ayes 5, nays 0. J m •tv -> •-* ■ V. . . .1' f • wmmm m: 4 * I.*-/ Sf ■r^K- - ■ JjSt fr.. - ilfr'iM- 4iii^i.,rifaiei' 8 ’(S'.-It-. ■ i ■ ** -1^:. •' •. «r^,f ^ryu: -Il??’ - i -i;':. « : n Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator April 14, 1992 Subject:#1700 Dale McCurdy, 4041 North Shore Drive - Variance - Referred back to Planning Commission for Additional Review Status of Application At the April 13th meeting of the Council, Council referred Mr. McCurdy's application back to the Planning Commission for additional review as applicant has submitted an updated survey and hardcover inventory. At the February 10th meeting, members voted to deny Mr. McCurdy's request for Council to act on the current application without an updated survey and was given 60 days to provide an updated survey in order to complete the variance and building permit review (April 10, 1992). Mr. McCurdy submitted to the City an updated survey and hardcover inventory on March 31, 1992. Pertlnont Ordinance Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover excess exists within 75-250' setback area where additional structural hardcover is proposed. No increase in hardcover will result with this proposed construction. Review of Hardcover Facts Recommended survey 0-75' setback area = 7,600 s.f. Allowed “ 0 s.f. Existing « 1,022 s.f. or 13.45% (In 1986 review, staff reported no hardcover within the 0—75* setback area.) 75-250' setback area * 18,110 s.f. Allowed » 4,528 s.f. or 25% Existing = 6,990 s.f. or 38.6% (1986 staff hardcover inventory reported at 5,907 s.f. or 28.6%.) List of Exhibits A - Staff Memo 11/14/91 B - Council Action Notice 2/14/92 C - Hardcover Inventory D - Current Survey Dated 3/11/92 E - Resolution #2102 . •^V W. :r- ;1W ' iii'liiliriili' TXaHBP" >. ■» ,^i^: !l-f .•' vr Zoning File #1700 April 14, 1992 Page 2 of 2 r;':^Brief Review of Application > / V- ■«|H i' Mr. McCurdy seeks approval for the construction of a second _tory 7’ X 18' deck to the street side of his residence to be placed over an existing patio resulting in 119 s.f. of additional structural hardcover. McCurdy completed the required removal of some 250 s.f. of excessive hardcover in the 1986 review. It was determined in that earlier review that the excess of paved areas on the property was needed to provide safe access from the site based on the topography and the location of access onto County road. Many of the same findings and hardships sited in Resolution #2102, Exhibit E, can be made for the current review. ■V. V U:'ri I m-- ‘ -T w.♦y ^ m W: 'i I li I ' ♦♦bnV j V , .4 1-4 ' w ' •'•-'-ifc'V-i- • 1 i •■vv: Ml •> :1 .•W> iS. ♦ iWiM • ;■ ' . * 'y*- • 1 ■'•^V 4".i <;i'h Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Moorse t^S-Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator November 14, 1991 #1700 Dale McCurdy, 4041 North Shore Drive - Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.22, Subdivision 2- - Hardcover excess exists within 75-250' setback area. iv‘. Hardcover variance approved December 8, 1986 (Resolution #2102), Exhibit J for a detached garage. Hardcover facts were developed by staff for that review. They were as follows: 75-250' setback area « 20,625 s.f. Existing hardcover « 5,907 s.f. or 28.6%* ♦Refer to Exhibits 1(1) & (2). Applicant has submitted the same hardcover facts developed by staff in 1986. Current application proposes = 119 s.f. of structural hardcover to be installed over existing hardcover (patio). No net increase in hardcover.mS). Section 10.03, Subdivision 14(c) - Lot coverage allowed = 3,094 s.f, or 15% Existing = 2,180 s.f. or 10.5% Proposed « 2,299 s.f. or 11.4% No lot coverage variance required. julst of Exhibits 1^5: Exhibit A - Application Exhibit A(l) - Applicant's Addendum Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat hap Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Adjacent Property Owners Acknowledgment Form Exhibit F - Survey for Addition 1976 Exhibit G - Average Lakeshore Setback Line Exhibit H - Sewer As Built Exhibit 1(1) - Hardcover Fact Sheet Prepared by Staff for '86 Application Exhibit 1(2) - Applicants Hardcover Fact Sheet Exhibit J '• Resolution #2102 Exhibit K - Building Permit #6318/4-6-87 Exhibit L - Building Permit Application 1091 Exhibit M - Floor Plan for Deck Addition 10-17-91 etch-North/Street Elevation mmi m 9m ft ■ i.*- nt !■ ■ » * ^ '. -.n* f•-' C: -;- ^ w: r- • A, .»»:•■fK Zoning Pile #1700 November 14, 1991 Page 2 Description of Request Applicant seeks approval of a 7'xl8' second story deck to be Installed to the north or street side of the existing residence. The deck will be located over an existing patio resulting in no net increase of hardcover. Improvement will result in a 119 s.f. of additional structural hardcover on the property. Lot coverage with the proposed deck will be at 11.4%. Review Exhibit F. Applicant claimed that the deck was originally proposed at the time of the construction of the addition to the west side of the residence in 1976. The patio doors were proposed at the second story level. Staff can find no record of the original plans that would show the proposed second story deck. Applicant has been asked ♦■o provide a copy of the those plans for our review. Applicant commenced construction of the second story deck believing that the deck was already covered in the 1976 building permit. Applicant was asked to stop construction and to file for the necessary building permit. In reviewing the existing property and the hardcover facts submitted for the 1986 review, staff has noted errors in those original calculations involving the 0-75' setback area. In addition, the current hardcover facts do not reflect the driveway in its current configuration that were installed at the time of the •instruction of the detached garage. Staff has asked that Mr. McCurdy provide updated survey and hardcover facts for the current review, Mr, McCurdy has advised that the updated survey and hardcover review will cost more than the second story deck. Review Exhibit A-1. Applicant has filed the application submitting the former hardcover facts asking for special consideration as the proposed Improvements will not result in an increase in hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. If it is the intention of the Planning Commission to recommend approval of the application that results in 119 s.f, of additional structural hardcover, your options are as follows: To recommend approval of second story deck addition and to advise applicant that if other improvements are proposed at some future date, applicant will be responsible for providing an updated survey and hardcover inventory for the property. / w-■ ' < • V * /. ■r 2oning File #1700 November 14, 1991 Page 3 K-XV ‘/\ To recommend approval of the deck addition only upon receipt of an updated survey and hardcover inventory. In the original 1986 variance application, the approval was conditioned upon applicant providing an access and utility easement over the sewer lines that intersect the property. Review Exhibits G and H. Applicant is asked to advise if an executed access and utility easement has ever been submitted to the City for recording. Staff can confirm the removal of 250 s.f. of landscape hardcover along west side of house. "Hardship Statement Please view Exhibit A » !* ■-11;^: mmiim 'mm •» - .•/'•:■•* wVV,- 1 ■ •, ,‘P MM ' \ :* '.'■ly te'f: ^ Zoning File #1700 February 5, 1992 Page 4 Additional Exhibits Exhibit O - Planning Commission Action Notice 1/28/92 'L* . ► il^ Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendation Please review the Planning Commission Minutes of January 21st for more detail on the review of this application. The Planning Commission advised the applicant that the application was Incomplete as an updated survey and hardcover ■"^^"^^Inventoiy had not been provided with submittals. The earlier ^discrepancies in the hardcover calculations on the property from the earlier review were discussed. The applicant advised the Planning Commission that the improvements proposed are not located within the 0-75' setback area. Planning Commission noted that there are questions or discrepancies concerning hardcover within the 75-250' setback area where the improvement is located. ^ Members voted unanimously to deny Mr. McCurdy's variance application finding it incomplete and further directed that since this application involves after-the-fact construction, the partially constructed deck be immediately removed and that patio doors be installed with appropriate protective barriers. I Mr. McCurdy advised the rianning Commission that he would not continue with this application before the Council and that both partially constructed deck and patio doors shall remain in its present hazardous condition. Staff has advised Mr. McCurdy that all after- the-fact applications must go before the Council (refer to Exhibit 0). ions of Action Available to Council To approve the application as requested by applicant and to not require an updated survey and hardcover Inventory until applicant proposes additional improvements at a future date or ■ V.?"' yam -.. To indefinitely table all action on the variance application until applicant has submitted an updated survey and hardcover inventory and to direct staff to require the immediate removal of the partially constructed deck and to require the installation of temporary protective barriers for existing patio doors. K,.mm.1 1 ■ k. .'ft ' ' ‘'’r ' 'r" *“ ' , ’ v^ ' wrr~. ■ 'W-^-r-‘ 1^ ft-f.APPLICATION NO. 1700 CITY OP OROHO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 473-7357 55323 NOTICE OP COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: 2/14/92 TO* Dale McCurdy ^ y 4041 North Shore Drive Mound, MN 55364 TYPE OP APPLICATION: After-the-Fact Variance DATE OP MEETING: February 10, 1992 VOTE: 4 For 0 Against COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION I*. *msmeMmappropriate legal action is necessary to require the partially constructed deck and to provide a safety barrier for the second story patio doors. Please contact my office if you have any questions pertaining to the directives of the Council..Tb •* V ■ cc; Tom Barrett, City Attorney ■ Vm-.Lyle Oman, Building Official Bruce Vang, Field Inspector ch ■•V’-'S. .. •. • I.:- wm m •T,e;:/ 'v:; r- -ly.rt* li'* MMM mf . ; 'Jitf -y ■ mQ: v< mmmm ■ ■'■'V ■ ■ w. 5'^ rnwym 4| i i y ' A c C^/< O Y HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET ScTBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE' ONE) 0“75* ^5-‘25Q^ 250-500 500-1000 i. w- v;v : V U'ky . Existing Hardcover in Zone 'ite- "a. House . i ■'............. t. wn ■ .'■• .-y. ••: a^.'c LENGTH r. ? Z2. 2. wmmm W^y ■ ■ Ai /r. Y il^life -:* ♦, B, Garage 2 X I •• $r* Driveway D.. Sidewalk _______21. C<5'-C. E. Patio / )eck fe»,j' Y9tjc. F. Landscape AREAS underlain BY ■ , _ plastic- ■ SHEETING ^,A. tl^S Other -3’ -"tt v» ; ^ a- 7y. 2 WIDTH 7.2 /2. <3 <r. 7 /. 5 27. • • •• • 77. J /Y2 (-5) = 7? J* 2<T2 JIJO 7? •t /^2 202 iTLt __ s.F. S.F. /Y2. 7 S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2sy ■ s.F. s.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. / '7o_ s.F. S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone ^970 t S.F. . i pi-:■ *i -Total Property Area in Zone / t s.F. 1 ■ .: V, ;■ • -' ■■ ■ ■'■ ■. i A B X 100 ^cr X*^Y AOCK /OCQ B 32-^0 % if ^ 4.* 4 Ji-V-L.' , V I • 'G y/-: .f ■•- ' i- ■ i.j' ,.^ I*-- '■■• i -4'" ---^ .y-i. : ,‘ *' rz’rr-' -.-a.'-rr — v .*^-.|, ■ .-t' ■'•fK/F, ■>!,V /^c CCf/^o T HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) (J-7^ Existing Hardcover in Zone 250-500' 500-1000' A. ■ H ouse y2L LENGTH WIDTH • • • • CUC^Ojf mm y/7, <r mAi /i? Garage fa-rVEWAY ■ /y.y X _ ^2^Z. /KCK 2 0 6 D.. S idewalk 2. o J 6 0 /<2 Zo ^atio/ 3eck Zs / F.Landscape rT*-r AREAS underlain Lr-r.:. : ' BY * i PLASTIC”............ SHEETING •• • # i t* COAlL^^3 mm S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F, _ S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone /02Z i S.F. ■• '^--F ;; . Vv'<^ Total P roperty A rea m Zone V6c^o -j S.F. mmmm-r.: ‘\>fi. A - ?-if-‘fZ k: .•''■t.-i. iH" . ^iy:% iV ' ' ^ - '.'[m /02Z • •B ^7600 X 100 - •.. ' • • • A/O *oc!C /A^ccctfi^a . • ••• .• •« « • M • • •• • •••• p • w* 4i^ .M*« • * * •JJ/* -A i:'-/ '■■ ' • *r T./ *V a 'S'./-'.’/ .• r- • ^ • / -t ^ . City of ORO jXO i d' \ -'ifc •*-.‘ •' RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2102 :#i / --♦•r '.,• .*. :,V' a;. h RBSO&OTXON CRAMTXIIO »| A VABXAMCB TO . ( ,*i . ‘-i •<> :-J ■♦.•‘.v*'1^'•• • -• - r* . •• within th. tot. 7 and 8, and that .®* ^’i5 ®?Vi “lwaY ctS5ianci^I^*at "’ tl» * L<* • (h«r«in«£t«r *th« property")> and MHBRBASa th« applicant ha* applied to the City jMvKf in th* 75-250* Imkeshm eetback *one in exceae o£ t ;.T-; • hardcover linit normally allowod. • ' ,It • »kv f f4* ;»■ I I \ d taV •- .* • / " fv * > BOW, THBRBPOilB# BB XT RB80LVB0 by the City Council o£ Orono, ^ ' * . _ a • . ••■*'••■• •'.‘.da I K «‘V' ■*’ . "f«. •* * ',4 .% ^<8 . . '"^4 • *< a. -* *• *1.« Hinneeota t PXH>XN68 ■ • . ■ t. » ' ' . • 1. This application waa reviewed as toning Pile 11088. 0 >*•■; 4 -a /• . V * W.* d .•» V a T,*V* • • *"4‘ !; — 2. The property is located in the LR-IB Single Pamily Lakeshor* Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed , November 17, 1986, and recowended approval o£ the proposed A'ii . variance based upon the following findings! • ...' A) The steep slopes on the property make it unfeasible to Xocate a detached garage <ols*where on the property. B) The existing 1-car detached garage the right-of-way of North Shore Drive. feasibly be expanded but is necessary for the • winter ^shiole ^rking when the driveway is Impessable. ' Page 1 of 4 V U'r ^V '■ .■■ 1. .li • I! • e, 0%. t ^ . I. -*• 1 ' a»* irfV f ■'i**■fk ♦ -jj I < s Y 4 i’l **'*>>** a . .■•••'♦ V *e - • * Iv J ■J / ■- » « :*! Sv>'«'» - . *•• • ,v -4r#»*. '4t. .rr* '• t mmtm m- ****.•.•. RESOLUTION uF THE CITY WUNCIL NO. '2102 * * . V ■ ♦ - * * ** r ^ ,. ■ S' •’ '• f V I »v - ll • ‘ .*«9# \ . .• - •• »*. ’^ •• ’>> « »v ■\*^'9 '- V ■• v .V;. AA WRONO' J-;; NO. _2102-------------; ; •;_;;, -...^ .. . i ' _-v, .- :■ • '.;•; ■ ■ « r H •\ I* ‘ 'S V • r* i'/'-r: fe' A- . ■ » . \ ,tA, **••■■ * r . .f ^ V|"* ; y .- . . f 0» 'DU* to the steep slope up to ‘J*f ^^SK5^4.‘^3Th« City Council ha* conuiderod'this ap|>;.lcatlon j.^conuBandatiooa of tho Planning . , ,,^ •!:•££#‘'coBUB^nti*'by th® applicant and ^ha S"'^of*Wa>ropoaed variance on the heal^p rsafety and welfare : 5. The City Council finds that the conditions ©» this oiooertv are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other . . pwMrty ” tSis sonin, district, that jtsntinp the v.risnce _ would not adversely affect traffic conditions# light# air nor,^-„^<^ pose a fire hazard or other danger propertyi not merely serve as a convenience to *5 “^/T* ^ ^ necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or Jf ;^; necessary to preserve a substantial property ri^t W**csnt, end would be In keeping with the spirit and intent, of the Soning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. • *.'• j • ’‘ V • ««■; ■i./ . • • . * • i' •- .j-» X-, t- “■'•*1 ,14. • • ■• -v • • . V ,. ’I COMCLOSZOHS# OBDBR AMD COBDITIOBS '** 0S-'^ •;v m :Si u:i : r Based upon the above findings# the Orono grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Xode Section ljL22^ ^.; %' t’ •.-'1= 'a--V *. 4 / '• : grants a variance to the Municxpax sonxn^ lubdivision 2 to permit the construction of a detached garage which will increase the hardcover in the 75*250* lakeshore ••^hack zone to-j^^,.^ 28.6% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed# subject to the,^^;v^ following conditionst le Applicant shall remove the approximately 250 s.f. of sheeting west of the house. Hardcover allowed on the as follows! • » #« « • 'C'' ' •;■, '.t'.“•■• ' '• i-"' 0-75* Lakeshore Setback Zonet None •y .y.y .' .•J,.. W'* • -« J,y\‘ ■k r-* • e ' I. 75-250* Lakeshore Setback Zonet O -• t > Rouse West Sidewalk Front Patio Driveway Existing Garage Bast Sidewalk Proposed Garage .t.. 1#068 s.f. 50 S s f e . 144 S.f. 3*308 s.f.^ 280 s.f. 215 s.f. 832 s.f. #• • •• . ^ , i •k. - - J *4 «# *,. ' , •'f' » /; v<v: •*. >v -4*%L f^. 'l'.* • .* . .' ‘y.*< ... * . •4r. i 4 - r“i *• V • *. •. i t •; ^ j; # y, . * ?•> V •: V' J-W 1 t HH< * ^.v'.M . ■ . . .-V Jr • ^*.. . li- . »ir ' ^ Uf < ' •'•►> . . •• -> ■. ' • ' • ^9*^ ***•♦<■• .*, • ^* V* - *" ■•',•. • ,' ' ' • » • *1 ■ k - V RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 2102 • Ky^i ■. • .V.. .• ^ y-frV‘ ' >'■ ■- ** .> .. V ^ r .^- '• * i. iV r; OF THE CITY COUNCIL T . • / -.r:' N IS ®Sl?Appl4c*nt‘tl«'‘«dvii«d that^any^'futureTproposal's resulting in ;H^uXii;"«dditional hardcover on the property will not be approved* and ,v.';’;. f * i -'i^j^VM^alght /bei^approved only ;wlth'r.coneurrent removals of existing ^■*'t<Shardcover jresultlng'In,no■^netvlhardcover Increase. ' r. :. •■ nvi' r ,. ‘-f- S ,, .. .•;< , J. ^'V' V 2. Applicant shall grant the appropriate utility and aeceBm.^-'*''^ *' easements for existing se«#er lines on the property. ''r X - *■•*■'• '4 »’ ‘ 3. The existing 1-car garage located partially within the right-r i I of-way of North Shore Drive is a non-confonaing structure and Is .* *. * subject to the pertinent ordinances governing such structures. ‘ ^ < 4. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property .: .^,, .. I % • . anot with the applicant* but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of' the date of Council approval* or this variance will expire on;:-.:K'.fV 4. that date (December 8* 1987). .yk. > • :* V* -1. ■/ <^1-. ,r.# ^ 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and t conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code* shall autraatically terminate any authority granted herein* and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. ' v > *, 1. : 7^- . ** ■ • <fhS i. 6. The undersigned applicant has read* understood and hereby ■ j- !; agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself * his heirs* successors and assigns* hereby agrees to the recording '^ ,[ of this resolution In the chain of title of the property. . - •» Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of ^ 4 . 7- m ir* 1988. e.-’4 * . f . . . -• ATTBBTl » > * fir * 1 • ■ ' m 4k>rothy iW'Hallin* City CJ ./ * '♦ > V* k• • ^ .. w/ >’ ^ V. ' f- . ... . . • I • Mary C.^fimtler* Mayof\• *. \ A,' .. m I \ r. ' * fcr;. • ->•% • • •« L;*.-f ' 4^ u: |4*>' .Ik -»>♦. .. ' v ^ ^ W V ,. r . Jw* . ^^eV;**v >-v., 7*4 . . **» •■ ' ’.V.•■.*>■>•.■;.7;■ Page 3 of^,4 ,'77•■ *.^:.V 41 7 r-. *f ♦h.-r- V s *•0-4' i V V * *»Li / c • I wm 'flpip r ^.jf»-.-, *To: "■.... ■ > Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse r City Administrator i»r- -^'f' Froms Date: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator April 10, 1992 J‘f r- ii subject: #1714 Thomas W. Lytle, 1935 Concordia Street - Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing Revlev of Application Mijsit At the February 18th meeting of the Planning Commission, Application #1714 was tabled to provide the applicant additional time to consider a revised proposal that would attempt to relocate deck out of the 0-75' setback. Review Exhibit D. Note street yard improvements are still as originally proposed. Pertinent Ordinances - 1. L1&Tr .‘J-.tL. ■■ •' ',-'4 ’ i > ' . tji Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) - Street setback variance required for detached garage to be constructed in street yard of lakeshore lot. Required = 10' Existing «= 8'8" Proposed =» 8'8" Variance * 1'2" or 12% 2. m fPlS,: . ■■ Section 10.25, Subdivision 6(B) - A side setback variance required for detached garage. Required =*10' , Existing = 3'9" Proposed « 3'9" Variance * 6'1" or 61% '5' Section 10.22, Subdivision 1(A) - Lakeshore setback variance required for amended deck proposal. Required * 75' Proposed » 72' Variance » 3' or 4% Section 10.22, Subdivision 1(B) - Average lakeshore setback - Current proposal does not propose encroachment of the average lakeshore setback line refer to Exhibit D. wmMmmw:^mmm ■v«.V. . A, _.Vv' '•ij V. jf" V'. ir>i‘ V^' *r' r>-^- r^T-, ■r-” ^- • 4-.'T.,.V’ Zoning Pile #1714 April 10, 1992 Page 2 laiiM 5. c:mm fe. . . '.^i-v^-' v ■■ - B. mi :. ! ;„<iL (■ V ••#:mmmmm Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 A. Hardcover within the 0—75' setback area *= 5,625 s.f. Allowed = 0 Existing =» 0 Proposed *» 56.2 s.f. or 1% Hardcover within the '’5-250' setback area = 8,737.5 s.f Allowed * 2,184.3 s.f. or 25% Existing 2,205.7 s.f. or 25.2% Proposed per original plan = 2712.34 s.f. cr 31% [this includes expanded paved area to provide backing out capabilities in street yard at 172 s.f.] ■ Proposed per amended plan * 2,799.34 s.f. or 32%* *Review Exhibit C hardcover facts have been amended by staff, 0-75' hardcover is at 56.2 s.f. not 60 s.f., 75- ^ V 250' setback area hardcover for lakeside deck is 195 s.f. rather than 207 s.f. as shown by applicant ^ List of Exhibits - A - Planning Commission Action Notice ® “ Original Proposal C - Hardcover Fact Sheet 75-250' D - Amended Proposal E - Floor Floor Rerview of Amended Application The amended proposal shows a reduction in hardcover within the 0- 75' (originally 129 s.f., amended 56.2 s.f) and the setback reduced from 65' to 72'. The majority of the lakeside deck has now been located in the 75-250' setback area resulting in a 1% increase in hardcover within the 75-250' area [original 31%, amended proposal « 32%]. Garage and driveway expansion as shown in the original application has not been altered with the amended proposal. Review of the Hardships and Findings The severely steeped lakeside banks shield proposed deck expansion from the views at lakeshore. Proposed detached garage shall encroach no closer within substandard street cr side setbacks of current garage. The lakeside deck will not encroach the average lakeshore setback determined by the closest projections of the decks on the adjacent properties. Location of mature trees within the southwest side yard. M •j'® «'i V, -i:-: ■ — — — ■ ‘ *‘ ^*- • Zoning Pile #1714 April 10, 1992 Page 3 ' ■ ■ >; : / • -. . ■ oT Issues for Consideration 1, Are there adequate hardships to support addition of some 56 s.f. of hardcover within 0-75* setback area? I.f ^ -.‘/-•fa 2. m. What is an acceptable level of hardcover within the 75-250' setback area now that the majority of deck has been located behind the 75' setback line? 3,Are there existing improvements that can be removed to minimize increase in hardcover? >^^^ptlons *>f Action Denial. Please refer to the pertinent sections of your code for the necessary findings H Kii or Approval as proposed or amended by Planning Commission based on hardships and findings noted above. Wi ' ':5i ik mem W" mi m:‘ P'S -'.Vi ;^'7 'v'f mW >■•■ .7-^ ■ ■ 7^ - ‘?>» ' ■ ■ ->/• ■ .P'S ■ 'i'i ■ v' % ' I »v. 'f: i. '4:'! S ■V s. •f' 4>! . . r *;V. '.<.Wr»7) 1^ --r ” -".‘'S' !# , r.\ V5' ■' V • t ■ ■>’, '*v CITY OP ORONO P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bayr MN 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1714 55323 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice: February 20, 1992 TOs Thomas W. Lytle 1935 Concordia Street Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES TO TYPE OP APPLICATION: Variance DATE OP MEETING: February 18, 1992 VOTE; 4 For 0 Against Planning Conmlssion recoomends the following: To table the application providing applicant additional time to develop a revised proposal that would consider realigning the lakeside deck on the property. Applicant is encouraged to contact the zoning staff to develop a revised proposal. Staff has enclosed a copy of the original proposal, a site plan where original proposed deck has been removed, a staff plan showing proposed hardcover within the 75-250' setback area but excluding a proposed deck and the proposed hardcover fact sheet submitted with application, it would be helpful on a v»ork sketch for applicant to locate mature trees in south side yard and approximate location of bay windows along west side or lakeside of house. i^lease arrange to meet with staff within the next two weeks so that there is adequate time to prepare for presentation before the Planning Commission at their March 16, 1992, meeting. Deadline for resubmittals would be Friday, March 6, 1992. Please contact Jeanne Mabusth (473-7357) if you have any questions concerning the above request. Wm' ^ / • wmBmim !;?■ # I - la Stci - A W*. ' ‘ •. 'S ' -. .i ^......fe.i—.X*. II in • r ji;'"'; --imm fkc^ ?o5£t> HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORK^ L'/n /‘7 ISC. fmM SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE OME) 0*7575-^ Existing Hardcover i^Zone ^9:7 X 250-500' 500-1000'O ' . A. ’ House ^ WWi LENGTH WIDTH ></.r y f>l = >^V.O S.F. WMmmmm S.F. Wifciia S.F. X S.F. 5r---.Ws Bt Garage S-V S.F. D riveway S.F. LL */S.F, D.. Sidewalk >jT/s' ^,'■1 S.F. mmrn^mmm /?>. S'‘/y. r ■i. .j S.F. 3s#Sf’■ SIs.s;S; -'^sll ^ATIO/ D eck S.F. } smy-i /ar f-'-ymm Kimmmm mmmsm s.R. fX>3^>o7. F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY t . PLASTIC SHEETING S.F. A ^ 7 - S.F / S.F. S.F. U)OQt>G. Other __>-7 S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone >5-/---3/,.p. "-Y :J Total Property Area in Zone %« ■?r3T. r S.F.B >s'Xo,3/-^ri X 100 ^ % •."W 4T Ki/ V - Y’-'V:- <i\-,i - -I. -i*. . . ■' -»> '■»• >*“' • '-j # ■1. K - . Ai ,f ./• ■m E %$:■ ■- f o THOHAS ^•.E -f*-- |i^EE-v:-:-:Sr:' '/ .'Si-:If- ■/f‘i - t'»V- vv3«i;f 5;.:,;p»^ t:: ;mmi-ioV )■’ ■ v.-,Eir.r7*ir^^iip^ P". "i k- 4 ■*E::rr -V- S*< ;i'v-'.;'id»V iitiiwm kV'^ '** ‘T^.R ^mir W^-kL Iw! - .E mm K- *5? -^->■?®&;prnmmmL: V • v-^v;-?; i -iN-:. ••<.• Ak-:i--;:'-ii f,- -»^yV.- ... '.1 ■-m;€yEvy-:Elii Ll...4n[. Y. : .. ' .,WV»5»r'rt feS0li ii-f« »>;• -■•v'^^ kMm ^rr:':?.^,'-‘V> Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator April 14, 1992 Subjects •'.mr ■■■ m #1724 Taunmy L, Woodis, 2818 Casco Point Road - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing •4V i^ertlnent Ordinance Section 10.03, Subdivision 10 - A conditional use permit is required for in ground pool/patio to be located on a through lot in a residential district. Section 10.75, Subdivision 4 (A) - Setback front and rear required for accessory structures on through lets. '. Required = 30' Proposed front = 108* Proposed rear *= 194' .-W Ordinance requirements are satisfied. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Lot coverage. Total lot area = 24,700 s.f. Lot coverage = 3,705 s.f. or 15% Proposed = 3,592.7 s-f. or 14.5% [Review Exhibit G] Ordinance requirements are satisfied. wm mm on 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover variance within the 250-500' setback area. Total area = 17,800 s.f. Allowed = 5,340 s.f. or 30% Proposed = 5,552 s.f. or 31% Variance « 212 s.f. or 1% 500-1,000* area ■ 6,900 s.f. Allowed = 2,415 s.f, or 35% Existing = 0 Proposed = 0 Total lot area = 24,700 s.f. Allowed 7,410 s.f. » 30% of the total lot area liH Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (E) - Accessory structures in excess of nt area but not exceeding 1,000 s.f. Footprint cated at least 15' from any lot line. Pool basin 5' setback from all side and rear lot lines. IT-:- i .. .0 mr:- S;'-/ f I iv': ~ - ivrrTiiTt V * ^J^gr=i - Zoning Memo #1724 April 14, 1992 Page 2 Llst of Exhibits A - Application B - Applicant's Addendum C - Property Owners List D - Plat Map E - Legal Combination P - Hardcover Facts G ~ Staff's Inventory of Hardcover and Lot Coverage Information H - Staff's Sketch I - Survey of Proposed Improvements Description of Request "V Applicant seeks approval of a conditional use permit for the installation of a pool to the north or rear of the residence on a through lot. As already noted, a conditional use permit is required for all accessory structures on through lots. It was the original intent of the applicant to legally combine the parcels so that a variance would not be required. Upon review of the hardcover facts, it was determined that a hardcover variance within the 250-500' setback area at 1% would be needed to approve the proposal as presented. Applicant may be advised to reduce 212 s.f. of hardcover or members may be asked to consider the remaining portions of the property within the 500-1,000' setback area. 6,900 s.f. does not contain any hardcover improvements. With total lot area at 24,700 s.f., applicant would be allowed a total of 7,410 s.f. or 30% ^hardcover. If applicant was to attempt to relocate pool in the W^northern areas of the property, the application as proposed would ■r require a setback variance because of the limited 50* width. Note the required 10' separation has been maintained from pool basin to 2nd story deck structure shown at 12 1/2'. vi; mm ’A: ? Options of Action Approval as proposed, or Approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Removal of _ _ _ _ _ s.f. of existing hardcover or reduction in proposed hardcover. t _ _ _ ■'r 1 I msm. VI* T •• ■'} • -wi As already noted above, the applicant has satisifed all standards for the conditional use permit as structure meets the required 30' setback from both front and rear lot lines. As for hardships for the variances phase of the application, staff would note the following; a) Shape of lot. , b) There is no hardcover within the 500-1,000' setback area. Such area consists of total of 6,900 s.f. ^ c) All pertinent standards for the conditional use permit for accessory structures on the through lot have been satisifed. / CITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND USB APPLICATIO i fJ 3 ./ /•fit y1 -'H: PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ""1 \ C/\S( Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) .rU Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT C - ’• I “ • " . .KV'Name ti\(\mw u loocx O iSmm .•#Address } (-! V c rVS( '■ _ _ OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- - - - - City _ _ _ O'.>7 7 Zio Kp Address Zip Date Property Acquired _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _- - (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels or lana. PEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS ~ Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee , After~the—Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee ■n: 'Nf 'f $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use _ _ $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _ _ $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _ _ $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _ _ $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use _ _ $200.00 Land Alteration CITY OF DROHQ '• ^ FIRARCE OFFICE 1350200001 01 CEil 125.00 CHECK TL 125.00 RECEIHT-THM YOU ^1236280 cool F<01 T1 : i -r /A^ • i03/01 Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Gradino and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore PRD/PID ~ see fee schedule I APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Appeals } i other - see fee schedule i '■’^•i'/.'<4ip ?c PRSSBMT USB OP PROPERT^f Present Zoning District I Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify)^ DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail; R 1. 2. >•11 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. riRBD SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form. j Certified Property Owners Lf :• • owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County i;^ijartment of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction planr if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Bvyifc'V 'y.Vr‘S Li-YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll*^^ X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - Date- - - - - - --— APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature IS SIGNATURE Date The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes or investigation and verification of this request. ^^bwnar's signature ^CU Date ____ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Cw.mmission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are hold on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. . ;s y- fe-"i ■ V.• i 'v S*' »T*^&V ; <jtr • I M.- -• -X J * ;•'*'% i> •^. *«**^;*\ «» fc ;t:V'-i'^*i‘ 'V?V SPBSl m ■?.t^ ■23f?T ‘..•I'v ^•Ix-^*,.."; "5 A X' 4 *' *■» •i. fr\» -• »■'., . •■'.•■ ■■' «*?! '- - r:-.’* > ' ■* Uvn‘'j|»7 ;i ■’--s -«i ..■'-s' . *-'5 * '*» ■ "*>•‘*jj 7 , # ..y -?'V ;;;;^.>v J ' i/ ■ .v:'-.*t,*-:v. '* ’, i'* “-'. • 'X , ■ r>.j » -. -: V * •#17 /• fY\ftfii^<rV A-H-CiiuWo i/J BuoLaspJ Q.iO'-g’. 4-K-^ PO<5JVt-S /I ^)d rn/J -<A--f-€.tf-A^. ig^esi<£.6l -Vo c:)(o-m.C(fc^ -fh.e, L^A<g.(/Wjr<25 p ^ CJrJ {nt-€d. do lt-‘ ^4-0 SuzuyvMi-iy-S r\AW (A0fYvgs4^c^g^•f _CAS<: o 4k (S pr.rxC ppr>pO S SC^^lO ^ oc^r__.io; ><r<r ww#*- .4k^ I7qp-t Arv<JC--g_S „.(k£a^L^A f*pp PjOU f^-L. ,C> _..^^JVl<oiM L<^^ Co '•* -4 ^ryvsco z-^-^/4i(-fe aoHi7_-j5’::ija3o oo s ■:1 j ;3<£, 0^c3o(<'-l C(R<;Oo ti-'^LPik.is 2o -lln-o.^-P- ^ " ~ .. ' " OOOM -■';A'x-; V.-' r.’.-x : - ‘4- "H —k>' ' > • \ " «fc v ■kS . • i* '■’.■■■ **'jv * ■-» *' '■ i-'-/ * ‘ x» Co4- ^"1 f^LcxJ<.^ C) <!5dS •MiP __ SviooO>.&Cv ^ (T^ ^Ccw< ■•■4 *▼' :• r‘ - - ■•V’ I . ■ 'W ■•:■■ I >■ «*■ *•■«>• -V s. •< S3*®o79 O X M » XI O M N > M IN> 9 <909*^ N ^ X 9> > c. vn M C M 39 » O Ul > %4 Q rv> 9 -< ^ Z C. Nl N _ 'O> f- O ^ W H O D Z O > > C >9 C. Z _ M 3 o SriH*5 o o m > 39 n 9 I•« c z o to HZ O 04 vn z m -9 fvr 9 O m C* O 9 H '•i ii^/;vVi. _____rsay.S3 9 Hvn ■ * * y^ /^' * •' -n *9 I > H m m M F o o O O M e m m 9 X X < < m MM o z ro c. c. o 9 > H M 9 H O O H N 9 >0 > z X 9 rv»H n c c o> > z z • _900_M X o X n M Z O C. <. > H 9 •z r- r- n M O 0 9 9 M N N9 z m m z r\» 9 H X X O 9 Z Z M M Z M M Z 9 m m z H z z o • I iS 3S X M m m o 9 fN3 9^ Hf-r- -C H > > HN 9 M M H > Z Z 9 IM«H o m m o ^ 5 m fit Mj o r* n M O r- o m r- z Z 9 m M 9 « H I fS»H g O 99 m 9 Z Z 9 O Ms Z IM O 9 M •. \ \ rv-' . ' f 1 ••. ‘V> ^ .’* j I '.I. 'v'.UH-r H oMgo Mxaojji > H > > IM -< Z Z H N ^ ^ > ^ fM H o m m I 1 9 I Z C> 9 O IM 0 0 0 0 9 9 M Z 9 Z 9 H M s Z IM O 9 M Z o M Z 9 O X fM Z Z O 9 >9 IM 9 -< O U C. 9 N M o 5o55»-'^ > > C 9 9 i MJ o m m n Mo z z > H 9 • Z 9 9 O IM _ 9 9 Z Z 9 Z Z fM 9 M X 9 Z O 5 9 •< ® Z m X o’Imz “ji X IM z 9 O 9 > H > > IM 9 H ^Z Z HN ^ m m ^> X X ^ to HO o > > X X M X O O O O M Z O Z Z > H 3 Z Z O 9 9 M 9 9 9 Z r- r- Z IM 9 H 9 > O O M H H 9 I m m O IM M Ze g>0 9 5"o MgWf .yM. *> J* •.■ »V H O Z > X S O X z m z m > z X -< X> m z o o z > o a X z z m Xk z n 9 o 9 X > M H O 9 M Z H O 9 K < H 9 m 9 IM O Oz r- • M X Z O O O 9 > H > IM 9 X H O Z > M 3 O H -C9 < 9 H IM 9 M 9 > ^ O •• 9 IM HO o >- > 9 C. I 9 M Omm o o at Z O Z IM X O 9 9 O M Z O Z > H O m m 9 z 9 H 9 IM 9 M 9 9 •M 9 m z M O 9 c. m 9 I Z > M O fO H Z H O 9 9 “ 9 _ 9 O 9 Z Z M M m Z O M Ho H O Z Z Nm oz • %4 •- ^ Z O 9 O 9 X > M H O 9 M Z H > O 9 Z -< H 9 m 9 IM O Oz r" I M X M H H o ^ X •M 9 H ®*6t5 Ozmo z o _ o a • Z 9 Z M O m m 9 Z 9 H 9 IM 9 H S > 9 > > IM N«ii"> H H 9 HO O > > r- r- I 9 -< M iSiSg:: O 9 I Z X O O IM O O M O 9 9 M O 9 9 Z O 9 H M 9 Z O Z IM O 9 M 5-o o S* •y X ro z z o g > H O O IM -< -M f" I- -M fM 9 ni Z H > Z Z 9 IM O • M X •M M M 9 • Z O O O IMo m m o 9 9 M9 z m z 9 H H O 9 sO > M '"3 X» Z O 9 o 9 X > M H o 9 M Z H > O 9 X H H 9 m 9 IM Z f ? Z O O H O I O Z M m m 9 z 9 H 9 IM 9 mma 3 o M IM 9 9 •M 9 9 f- ,>k. ■ . m •JK r . .Vi* « •#17 X w > 9 O 9 , , fS> 9 •< O r- 9 9 N H > M> ► X O H IM H O Z _ ^ > > m X I9 Z > ^ M X O O Z O M2 o m m > H - 9 1 *v , - H ^ Z Xo > 9 M Z 9 z m 9 H >o M Zo • V X IM H H o^ H m IM S •< M Z 9 H IM 9 Z M > < a 9 IM HO O > > 9 m I 9 Z M X O 9 X O M So M > H -------9 1 O IM O 9 i z So z 9 M O 9 Z H 9 H Z ^ H M Z Of is X IM 9 9 9 M H H IM 9 H ^ m Z H N 9 < J>> m Z 9 IMH o z m « > > H I9 z #n ^ M O Z O M 4’ O Z 9 m o 9 ■ Z H Z o fM O m 0 9 9 M z 9 9 Z 9 "*3 3S Ss •>. Z 9 Hmz I o c ffl • ." *r -i’ • ar ® ••' • ,. . w *■ M .5 : ?, ,V-/v r • *»k. ., .' ii ' . «f * X- .V - •i ' ••U-. ^ ■tr. fcAanx.V "'''' ^ : ■ - ',» ■t.’ -.^ ‘T '44 . ■ ^............................ , ..,. #An' mUiII ' ^r . -4 , , ,* ..a"er •• 0 vl €? ■WS*3?- ■ ^ I > - • I I f-’ ^/ > V :v' ■^♦•'•'•>-’» ^- •■ s’ -^r^- .- • ■V #‘.. ; •-4 O -«l^iS R > 3 "* V -< > SS|Ss s» -f Q -al^is5 m -nm > » > m z o S*5Sz m L ■^SS^Sfg Z M W O M > ^ S 2 9< in 2 c N ^ o o ui > m m ^ M HO o ^ ^ 0 C3 I M58i|g? In 04 _ so m M > o o o rsi < m m o 01 In m z Z >01 m < M H m > o V. Z Of 0 O O ^ _ <M m m o -< H > > o IM «o z z ^ > _ Oi fs» I O O M Z Z > M5 b in rti g N M M • ■ ■ ■-* ■ ''>> -'■fr*:. V. • :' •,. ' ♦ -< -sj z -V S ^ f- o c/> V 01 M M > H > H •• M M H O Z O VgMHO > «< H M • f- m o M sl?jg5 •n n ^3IIn M *n .. M ffl O 04 in m 04 M z M S3m M m O o •n tr I > M !§§£: Q O Iz o z rs> O m m 04z o> H o> 01 M 8 in Ch S’ .V':; ^ -■ -:S' • ^ .■• ■• .•'.^ V. ‘ ' . .. ..■ ■ -• f /.'.V- * • ^:. . I ^ •’ • ‘^^ ,. . .;W ■•;• . ■•• . -i ■♦ If *•. V *' H Q Z > z z Z Z O^ z m z 5:5*>> m z oi*5Sz m Z 04 > H -< ^ N %% iS O o a O 04 CM o» N4 >0 NO ro m m X X > > > in m in 04 nO H* O § I M S? o r:> O 04 m m z > M < ^ m o on 04 z fva > H < M M O >H m > -4 X m iS IS) fo S in in 04 nO M > < ** ^m H -< O m Mo I M M I fVJ 04 -< O m 52m r- ffl m H X s o m H Z 04 Z Z O M M 04 0> H In n z H 04 z in > o 04 ro H o z _ o > > o X I 0l>H»j o z M no _ r- In m _ in r- !o X H > M I fV>04 > 04 < H» ffl e nO # * ’.4 '•/ > . •»>* **• •r t ■•••■• :-'v*«’ ^ iV ' h/'-X-t :.y .■ _ I :k' ■ if*" ‘ './.fcV, ^=.* ■ »' V*.-•• ..V ■ V :-- ! - ■•V: • . ■/ » ■• •<■... , •• ^'.■ ' fj*' 4-*^ • 1^1 •'*■•■ tttu ■ H O Zz > z z > X z o SJS"* Cl z > a 0 z z z m Z M 0 O O 04 > *S > > M 0 •< in f- r- H h4 o m m In > o fv> > > ^ ^ ? in n o M 2SiiS^ M M 01 • z 01 o) n iM O H H^ . . o 01In M m m 1333332 ko m m m M z z Z Z o HZ ffl H O fS> z o 0 > m n •M cM Z O -4 Mn o) > 0) X n o z O O 04 M 0 X H Mz o rs> z 0 o > in M z in Z 0 04 H > sO z M Z > o 0 M c n M z 5 > O M f- O 04 m z fvj z o o»M z > s om 35 z rv> 0 0 o 04 > H > IS) 0 H O Z Z H > m 0 o M -4 o r- c 0> > m • in 0 01 M Z n c M nZ o m z > H</) z M S ri 0 M o ^ z o 0 0 z r* z M 0 -J f- o S so M z M ^SSzhS z 0 ^ C 1-4is •A, .•V^v ** • 0 > 2 0 < H 0 m z so z m I- 2 z m z o ■ •. •» • «. . . *• ' r . • •' -- •■• * ••4-*? •-♦ / ‘yi, *Vs^.’ z m > H •< ON ^ 0 H m _ _ > H 0 m CO o 0c M 0 0 %4 > 0 |0M m o X ffl M r- H H Z 0 z i > z m M < Z > f 0 0 ffl m z 0 < m > ro 0 > z < ^ so m M f o o Z M M 0 r- c rv» c. c. o 0 > H 0 < fs> X Z H N 0 ni z M > 0 0 0 IM H ffl o > -4 > > I X MX m z z ffl M Z r* M M -4 H I- r- X I > r* r* m M < M M r* 0 0 m > > 0 NOM I •* • . • > Z M O 0 O 0 > H > > M 0 < 0 f- f- Hfsi o m m 0 > o m -4 n > > o Z M fn !!! o ^ 0 o n M X Q X X n MX o z z > H M M 0 I z 0 0 Q M O «4 H O 00 M m m _ H Z Z fNJ •< > M M HN 0 n o ^ > 0 MH ffl ffl m m > -4 > > IX z z M j| m r- P III M 53333^^ m m M ^8*^3S m M Z sO > M M ffl M < ffl m r* 0 0 ffl r- r* 0 0 0 > M 0 mm: NO z Z mM ■ :t. M Z m • **•- IM 0 > * !-•r * - - ' ‘ ^ ..■;■- , 'ft' , I— r * » ft': Jp V *' * . • .'• .r ■*« * * A V ' # I K * • • .. .t :»#• ♦* vVc. . ■y -C- '.' f I'- ”■•■..• ' 1^’ : • ' • .»• ."i »•'*'• > V - ;. ', •*1'^ • (jfV n/r V.;♦ "! • •;(?a ^ ' ■ ' O ■ •^w*- ■• • y - *■*' I P‘/-''- • i • y;•^■■y bv■ ^ - ■ - - - -— ■ I 4, '-•»t * ;.. . ‘*}i,, >“W «■._• fy- . _ -4 O -0 > ^ S S 3 -0 m -0 m > 90 V -< > gS5^^ S CgJ3ou. rv> Oi < o H 3 Oi N -H n X O ^ M Home O ^ O 90 M O X 3 O Ui 01 M < 01 X m X Of Of H m ON ^ 3 M M X 3 o X e O O O H o O C H C M X 4> M X o X mm > \-V X N X X O M : o N 01 < o o o o N 01 m m o o > > X X I </» H 3 o m t| O M X O X X ^ H O P 0> I X 3 3 O N H 3 3 O 04 01 mm 01 X f- r- X Of Of a H H o N M X X O H O X M M X 01 S® <9 N X N H H O M > 01 X X N S < o o Q Oi 5j. H O ► > — * in m w M 18 X K S M M M M I SiSSC! 01 X WO IS> M M X o^ ••,;■■-:■ •■ v.‘ *-1 — • • ■■ • ;.. , ,'V ; •■. ■•'»?” ■ * ,•„.. .. >JV» ‘..: .•. «**V :u^, ■iv r i“> r*-*v‘ •^ * - pp':- ■#■: '-■ f*!# ■ o;-■ ••■**•• .1 ’ V .r*;.• 1,H>',•••:*'r; V: » f 1 vrr H O X X ^ O _ X m X m > X _— 5 m X aS x*> aa X X N O O O M > Oi m N Oi H M X X Ci fS4 01 m _ M > O 01 IM H n X ^ o > > 0) I 01 o n M n > > o M O H X > H X p 0» I X m o o rv> 01 M M 04 sO M X (Oo n ? s M 4< • X N r- r- o 04 > Oi m N Oi H M O X 0» N Of z ^> > 3 OI N H O X o > > O O I 0» > Mg n X o o M 3 X 0» I X > m o fvi O X 0> O Of 01 M < 01 _ 04 H > X S X 04 O (N) S p H O M gN m Oi ;X N O O o ^ !> U X X N •< M m m 9 N M in H o r* _ 3 o 3 X o M X o ^ ^ H Oi n o» • 1=10 I X 01 M ^3 3 O f0 O 04 Of S0 i- X O 01 X 04 01 O 10 M k * C‘ • • *5 -. * r*. H O X tS o X m > X V -< > ► m X o O X > o a 3 X X m H o X > X X X 3-0 X m X m > X V •< >a .vr. ss a 3 X X m * H p X 3 X m X m > X > m X S o X > P a 3 X X m X f0 a p o Of > Oi > > N Ci -< N < O O 01 N HO _ O • M3 n -< •-< n M 2 o o o > H X N H H O > Oi > > 10 ^Sii? > > r- f- I Oi < M X X Oi I X X X O f0 gg|«OM O > H O Oi I X X O O 10 X N > > O 04 > 9 m f0 9 -< 04 X it 9 rsi 01 X Of > m X 01 N HOP o M • M m n M it X > H Oi Oi I X X m o 10 04 10 Nk »4i 10 iS O P O P P O P O Q M o P o o P M P M o P P M p X P P X P X P P X P X P P X m o rg PH O 10 P H M o f0 P H 3 M O X M P M O P s M X O X H O m o §• M X P 5 gS M X X P < —• - ■ -- ■ r-r%»*• smss X 04 O M M Z o H o 01 X H P ■ *^,*- ; ' * C* * X f0 X X o M f0 9 iS:< > 9 -< ro X m 9 N M > f0 > f- P H N cy K3 m o > > 3 I Oi ot ^ M O M _ > H > X Oi I XX n f0 O G) it O M 01 M > 01 X X 3 X U 04 H m o 10 %0 H 3 HI MX X e O P P H o mm o X N P P O 04 > 9 m m r0 9 H f0 < < 9ts4 ^ m m f0 > X X (0H o r* r- o >>-<- H H H Oi I X X X o r0 O m m o 04 01 M m m 01 X P P X Oi 04 H K H O (0 X OI P P > H m m 04 9 < N4 > > XI^ z X H _ 10 H n < < o I Oi P O M J O X X O M O m m > H M M Oi I a'^51 O 04 vO M X p M 3 04 pM < Mm Oi P X X X 9a 9 9 fS V* •J* m m f0 9 < M Oi Oi 9 N H r* r- M > m m H f0 H O H •< O Oi n o M 3 0 OM 2 O P P > H -< -< Oi t g X X O 10 o 04 10 p < 10 X H m p IM -< n f0 > m X 10 H o X m o > > > m H I Oi H m M 3 0 X X O M2 o X m Oi > x| m H O Oi i X 10 H H -< N 9 9 > > 10 Si3? H O < ;• • V ' *« V « 4 s ‘"y • o ‘h* .•»- *•>- . • • 4* • ' -.1^ • ^ ^ 't V' ■‘- * ^At;/:-.-V >••<. ♦><f * •. C * • >2 - ^ ^ -vr ‘V-, k*r > , v-< < f '■' V4»- >r^‘ »- • ♦#<i' . * niilt' VTwiiiititiFri .%•• ,J| I \ .•» '.'V. ___•'! ; ^ ^ ^ ■ •- ■ ■•.*• .,-•■■ ... / Sv: • :>-«•* -•;.' V: ■*'••>’ v-f';- ■.••.••••i/ • •.; •-^••. ...w f. ♦... ' * .••.■.• ;• ^ •«;.■•.. ' ■••'' .'• -i.. . • .^. • . . ; ’••'*, .r'' ' ' ' '* ■ ' 4 * ■. ', * ■-.■••■••...•• - ... •- • . . '• .♦ - ,. , ..:'• .... .. .» ^ - •,■■.••• ■- ■ . • ; ... • , .. .. < . ... . • ...3 .jl . ■ ■f’V - -> -I.-' V” ■. * •' •''.. ..• y n '•• = ■ ..y i r . 0 ■—» ■ ■ .■'j$.'f < 'i** ■* » * ,♦"• "T r • *»>• . .*- A0 .■ .. o o g •* ■■ . *• *••«■.' ^ f •• -Vi ‘ • ‘t •• ■ ' 'i'.A ’.'.*^T , •* • . "^ •- '■ ■ . ."to' ■•*'•- ■ ' •’ ' • .. . ♦.*••* ■•• • .^'-.*.rr • . f^- • »*:> . \r- ■ •■■ .\Vr v. T''V .'•.. ^ ;/V^, r'- ^ ^v: ; ■. ■./. . ’ .-■ V i. , '-r^'V.^ -V • ■ ' • *'’4", ■:•... .• . . ■■■.:■ :- "vv :y :'V-- v •-•■"■■:.O'-V A- ;• j o* N INI' .yiS-'*-..• •• 'i;' . . - V. ■•■? : * . ■• .■ '■' *r ' rT' w'. ■ _ :•. -• ■ •' - -V''. f -’ . •. * * • •>■ t » « -. V •» ."'■■• *' . . - :! * , : ■ .y^ • . • ■ .. • . f A . ,*..' • s • » . ... ; ^ * •;■' • ■'*■•{.'-’’ **:■?- ' tz'-' * ‘ /* *' • ' ' * /. '■ ■• . ‘ ' ' ‘ ’ • “ ■’'”■ '' ' ‘ '•' *' •/.' ■*. •...*■■ ■:/■ :: •■-.■:■ ■ . ■ : ■■ V ■ *■ ■•;' ■< / •. ■‘n-. '■W. .,:-. V‘-J' ■' -yfMi'-- ;ycv.: V,• t' J."’--.-'- .' . ^ ■ . ;-v.'.- .■■■■>■, : - : : ..■• 'n . -.■ ;'V ......r'•••?■: ■’. ■y"‘/7;-;:^ .n;,'-.I/V- -v’ ' .. . •..- ■ .■■■ • ‘ " .\ ■. ■•. i-. • ■ ^ .. : •^='.:.' '■--■■■' *..••■■■* . j- .'. - - •,. ^■ . «■ .■*■■-> ■• ■ 4;- .•'^ ^ :■••: -;•■ V.?: • V. ■: :»-1- t' '• '»•• ••••.♦*.•♦ tesi® {4: yym.; ,i ■' ■*-*■'«•'.. ■ '■■'■ ■•> 'Vjyi:^ 3 .\. ••. -. . . .*.: i - i • ■ A r .v-W- •h <%••♦• ■. ■ -V ’ .'... : . ;■*•■■".. ■."■.. . • -\^ . •• ..,..■ • '. . ,.••■• 'V. •, V-t." • ■ ■'.r- •>..*■ <iR^ . '• •• ■ . . ■ • . , ‘iL ■r .-.- -s*--••' ' •• . f '■ .-'j®4si.-' • .V ..'■•. A.. -k- ■ ^'- imHlnTtTillrii ... ■ .b.i -a_:. .^...’.<1.1.V-vx:-4:t'.- ^ ,• vt- V'■-“..■. .. .■.> ^ X0-4"' ^' 4'-% "X. 0 Xv(% : V- - .'Iv- ft':'-""'-'. ..1 N */^ /•'/■ :>t ,'T '. • !.W*^ ■w: »•. i4e- ^ • 4.' *T ' * /> / a A'Sa - » <* ai » * Pli ✓ ®ci?.4! -ac^ ■-^\?*' * • «■ ...if-*.■ ■;:,y fi/T A% fife.:-/ /* ; V-.** '•V Jri ^ 2 A > -4- b/^mw / / 2 •A s a/ /n T ^Am ^ /^ Sih V/ f a f'-#41 *n ■>• >» A ^r.g: ->^ 3 m-■^r '• ; .-AVV'V j*.:] . .:' • : -f r..- .' ■*. v; o fc'v y^/ <<j = >V < / «’> siL-/ ■ " t ••■'"v- '^V! k2 -r S\N ' % ^ I-./ *li- • « t /n r'^ # « ^ I .* / .* \ :^'}-''%y-/:s\ ’k.'J'.y ^_«-5 » ■*^ **^ ’ X t* \ \X i*W/ ■■:W I* S 4 7'^ T 41^ n k«-3 • -T76P3 »'«t:w’ ’ j A-J*.V* ., i ..kJ M. 4 * . .k V**a..^4> --I ^7 iJ- |.;: »i j* / a 1 ^ r»<^'1 -z. . ^ • i fc - - {•» 7* ’;;«•ffi ^ t*' *: ^ • <:'\ V y ^ i •? 4 ,ir^- TT' *____ ipwm ■;Vk. M - ^ -7 ' ■ -■-j--1'• - ~ f --^ .1 ’■:-^-^T—7-;; t • CITY of ORONO Mimkiptl Offices Post Office Box 66 Crystml Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066 -a•f'; ;i' X “ y Date:90 .;■ - Hennepin County Government Center Department of Property Tax & Public Recqrds Attn: Don Deutsche ID Controller A 607 Minneapolis, JOJ 55487 > .Dear Mr. Deutsch: I (we) hereby make request for a combined assessment on the following described land: Legal Descriptions: Lot 26, Block 4, Casco Heights - 20-117-23 32 0004 2818 Casco Point Road Lot 27, Block 4, Casco Heights - 20-117-23 32 0005 Lot 16, Block 4, Casco Heights - 20-117-23 23 0008 Address: 2818 Casco Point Road ■ M Municipal Code: 38 For 1992 Tax Year I Sign e oj ]Fee Owner (si signature o& Ta'x Pay(ignature Payer(s mm.t •V mrnrm-Mf A'*,v uymM-mm S7K c('%co .bfLO/-P '■ Tax Payer's Address ft ‘ ■ -i m -M:TELEPHONE - 473-7357 ♦ E\X • 473-0510 .1 i'..' HARDCOVER CALCULATIOH WORKSHEET ^SC3 SETBACK zone : (CIRCLE ONE) 0-73' 75-250' (|50-50o 3 500-1Q00 Existing Hardcover in Zone mm oZyi /./UiA If r’' '• S' ■ :.T?» k B. Garage c. Driveway jTife. D. S idewalk mA • V ^ i *vr,. '5-^ S>'--•• r'‘ ■' e. Patio / Deck %■, 1?. Landscape AREAS BY plastic SHEETING G. O ther j ■ ^ A ^t/ I - / / X . - X m S.F, WIDTH I I Cl 6 Cl H Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone jZ73 . S.r. .. S.F. S.F. S.F. 0-^O /S.F. » If m '1 S.F. S.F, OA S.F. 3'O / C) S.F. / :X (.S.F. \ILS.F. . S.F. S.F. S.F. - S.F. S.F S.F. •..S.F. ■■"■•.'li'siv'* ry-^mm A-^m X 100 SRrffT- 'W' r', •'■’ ( • >w^_» * 4**'" \t '■■■W' fc:-;" C" EXHIBIT "G" Staff Inventory of Lot Coverage and Hardcover Facts iri- . «r<:Ate Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Lot Coverage 78.7 s.f. shed 1568 s.f. house 380 s.f. three-season porch 800 s.f. pool basin 766 s.f. patio area Total * 3,592.7 s.f. or 14.5% ■ itt: pi i- n- : • r ; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .; ■ Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover improvements within 250-500* setback area Area * 17,800 s.f. 20.5 X 58 - 1,189 s.f. driveway 24.5 X 64 * 1,568 s.f. house 12 X 5.5 « 66 s.f. stoop [40 X 10 » 400] [30 X 6 « 180] Total 580 s.f. = deck/three-season porch [2nd floor] ■ ./■47.5 f. landscape timbers 25 X >5- 7:’; s.f. cement walk 6.05 X 1.75 = 10.5 s.f. chimney 9.6 X 8.2 * 78.7 s.f. shed 18 X 25 «= 450 minus 78.7 of shed area = 371.3 s.f., cement slab 40 X 20 a' 800 s.f. pool basin 54 X 29 *= 1,566 s.f. minus pool = 766 s.f. patio lllSl Total 5,552 s.f. or 31% mm \ m,y- ■V'; P';v--ZigM ■■ ■ •.? nSRp-SlTjKSfe i'" v''-a5fofetr^ r ' '“■V, L iS5d«a??4SiM '■•TV' ‘ ; ’■ '?afcaf;a*a r*w V. jriS! •• . '.^■;■ 'rv'i;'. ♦. - * A*'? '0^:: ■ ■*.■; . ;. Pa. .•r-'Z ’a;'- ' ■Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator April 10, 1992 #1725 Davis Pansier, 4180 Bayside Road Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing m-'. PeirtiAent OrdiJiance ~ Section 10.27, Subdivision 3 (A). Conditional use permit required for non-rental guest apartment proposed for residence currently under construction. List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Survey E - Floor Plan - Apartment F - Floor Plans - 1st and 2nd Floors G - Elevation - East 4^;‘^lteview of Application yp' Mr. Pansier recently received approval of a street setback Variance for the new residence currently under construction. At the time of the variance review, Mr. Pansier was advised of the need to file a separate conditional use permit for the proposed non-rental guest apartment in the lower level of the structure. Review Exhibits E and F. There are three accesses to the apartment. The principal access is via the principal structure either from the main entrance on the first floor level or via an access stairs from the garage. A patio door at the east provides a secondary access at grade level. There is adequate parking area on this 7 plus acre dry buildable property. In your review of the variance application, the septic design was reviewed by the on-site manager and confirms adequate area for septic treatment facility for a five bedroom home. The conditional use permit would be conditioned on the apartment not being metered separately from the principal residence nor shall the City assign a separate street address. Staff Becoonendiation To approve the guest house conditional use permit for Davis Pansier for the property located at 4180 Bayside Road finding all standards of the conditional use permit for guest house has been ■: -C satisfied. o'! V. ^ ■■ ■■ > -•'t; 1 OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USB APPLICATION ^ »PROPERTY LOCATION ^ ^° / <5o ^ i Site Address '-Uio a/■‘lA^vsi-g^ >e^a Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) “B/- H^-2.3- V^-gAg<y ' ^7 •Vl Please attach legal descripticr' to application if not included on required survey. . APPLICANT Phone (home) H')L “ Name T)/M/l^ ^ H. (^Ai56P>e Phone (work)(^/fv/^ Address ^*5^ U^lucStn^ 1)^-City LoA-s'2- f^T/9 Zip SS^^} r.l' I/- =OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone Address City Zip w-i :Vi ill Date Property Acquired __ _ _ _ _(n*orith/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. ^1 FEES - CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT'S - fi;im k :. •> :- - |K-m > -urA; V»:a- - E., ' '. -'‘vi*' • ‘ 't i '.V:'v; $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration CITY OF 0R0h ‘0 Fmr^CE OFFICE 1350200000 01 CES 150.00 , check Tl 150.00 ^ HECEIFT-lHM YOU \ a mm .f- IT' ■- H236960 cool fiOl 109:2 \ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more ^ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee I APPLICATIONS $200.00 ;a:;-::: ■ mwm . V'-BT • ' K $250.00 $175.00 $ 75.00 $300.00 $300.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Appeals Other - see fee schedule fulfill PRESENT tJSE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District R.H- lA Present use of Property Residential _ _ _ _ _ other (specify) 5/H«n DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: ^Ojt/\.A'y^*Ar / REQUIRED STiBMITTALS r-r,-;:;- Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 3b0' (you can obtair this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governmen-t Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. T'YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11* X 17” OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete Initials of Clerical Staff: Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to Jthe. best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date ^ //3/f / OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. /z /?2^Owner's signature Date 3 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. r' r W • r ■. •'?^w ^1 ■T' t? - ill I " v:-,.^S5 ^S5 9 Oa » m > XI N. -< _ > ni Z o o XI > a o 2 XI m > XI ^ - fi:> ni Z oo XI > a o 2 XI 9 m !gi:isBgigSg ? > M iSSSSS9 o f r* ui m ^ M M S uir C W ^ s? M 5 5 •Z o 2 2 •»n z 2 (/I2 F 9 M o« 2 XI 9 9 o o 9 9 m ^ Wis ^ </>(/> o gr- -4 H oc > > o O H H m m m 9 M j;op r Ui 99 o m 9 M 5 9 m T inin %/i in ss K{ ^ ^ ^ ' »■'' i r‘'.': #A.** .<*' '' / " , jg in in\M in sO nt r»> » u* 5SSS *S*onl » o s®? / -f - .: ...,■-. •>»'*. ■ '. it ' . ■ , ’ 's\ V>" ' *' «• -r- s;isSa C5J«’'"»C M 9 9 9 O J I-* iSS^SS9 in < MM O M O 9o M H o X in M I n» m Vi h9/10 M o in n M m iSSS 9 p r- r- K®CCSu. •o255 V C iS 9 -n 9 M MM 0 9 Z O X 9 O I m X X 79Jail;;;'-3 9 9 5> A Vi in o(/) s Vi M •y'. >■ • - * • ?a :3:. r t 9999PM H -♦ O 9 3 i *m«ai Ixi> gg m 9 ni nt 9 Vi 9 > M 2 M 9iss ■oogo o Vi 9 Vi MO M9 • ir ■”g o 9 ri iig-l? \- ■ i' OM 9 ?s 9 m m m Vi 2558 M .V, « ‘V.***^ •••< W, .^t. % y i'=--i -.-•' # • '’ • >' V.' r ■* •♦;;• p^i Vi' >.••': • *■< • --• ^ ■'V.. 4 •‘t V 4 A- -.s jiM ■ -r-r-'": ... '•*• ' •'-' ■ ■ • v'. . • r * v4 A ■ •■!. ^■'ac^:':'.' *, • , r ■ ',*■ -•»■•- ^ *, ._.r, . .. * -M i ^ f: r i ' i *•« •'; £ ' .' . t ^ - 'u ‘ ■ ' V- » 5*' ‘iS222»9 ^ O O M r in X X M m _ > > in ViX rn m m 9 > r- f- I C nt 9 9 Z M M 9 >9Z 9 M IQ m rs> 5ii5§'" 9 9 Q ^ 9 -< -< X Mo zmm o 9 o 9 9 O M M inin In>o S5i;|sr- 9 m ^ ^ m ^ 9 9 in Vi 0 9 0 M 9X9 I issss? X 9 Z 9 m invn Viin Z r- 9M C®o o ./. • v^' - - * * ’ *■ ' -V- • A. - - :. ♦ ^ z'. -w n•'X'^rv - • ^ -li ^ * y^ -.. i»/«.*' ••' -*T. ^ ■ ■ '■-^ »' Z M M Vi ® 2 y’6 o n in r X > >o99 5 IX VI M M M m ^ H 9 9 M M M M Vi M 9O O O in in Vi in 9- 9 rv» 9 in^O r- in Q (V m 2 9 In 9 5 ViMI M 9 > > P*aSss4 il5 n 9 Vim *5 in n vn m Vi in o |£ o 9 O O O ro V His M 9 Z 9 in Vi MIMisS 'mm 9 Vi InIn Vi in ?|£ O 9 O o o Vi JE M M rv "Snnito 9 Vi M M r- r- 9 IC/l M M M M Vi in in Vi in p ?5?j® j:.v A'J ?S5®® J r -< r 2 r* r- M Vi 2 9 f- oo m M inin Vi in 1nl ' *2 • 3 r^' iliSIss;°a28a p P V) 9 9 > ••< •• 9 _ MCp**PM H M m m 9 ^ Z o r* f- 9 I m M M (/) rs>3sp§: mm M K 33Sg Vi In f- o m m 9 II m >:>; ., •.** '>•••. ,.i - • ' ■ ' '■' .“P . t\ - r*^ n y' - iT'cV’* >• - ..' • •7 -A :* ■••-.. • • ■ • 9M 9'I- ■ *'j ’ • •* • • -».*• .. •*■ 4. ^ ... ..; .‘.r-- .,•. V . .: '.^ - A. fV.,. • ■. ■*. ' -f ;■, .». > . •\ X*' .V • P iV. .., Or 4- -‘'v- , -■_________■ G G G -'?■ C f > V- - •* V• . i- •.•« »* - - . ■•- • l-V.-'- ...., • • <jB rr> iti I ■" ”1 •. .. . * ,‘ . •..-,• ■ 5*'' -•■■•' ■■ v'.v-sv.-'.. f . ^: v-.' >•. 4... •-< ft ,' - / r. ■ 3^^ '.V.: . r V."!^y"--':y. :>• .v/v:; t. I j ^ ^ t * *»V »• \ p . <M ft. • H *" >1^ ; * * -.' '- - -I.. • *^v ^-r ** ’ :' . *•* 4 ' ■ :. j:- .1' * 4. • ' \ ^ • ' ‘ #i • - . •’ * *%• * '1 v ' ifi.t - .>•,-. ■••'"*. -r . * • .* - ' . •.:■• • *• ■ ; ■ . . • . . ,- - - , . " * r^'- ;•• ,. ■;>•■■ -.4.* ■■''■• -‘ ■ ‘ ■■ ■■"*". ^ - • ■T» >•-ft ’ *'■ V- . i . • "r\ L ' * ti m t ■.■'*• • - - -V ^ •■ ‘ -I. • .' * •i'. t • ^•v . vlH-* ^ . .■ 00»M r ^ i,‘ 4 7 i’-.-V’-.’ ft ^ i'- ;v ’- V . ««.y-' 'V/ : V »»» i'"' •n -o H »> M m ^-4. “.'i' ■ ■ ■' • *- y .• •" »• • . •• w • *♦■;■'••'— ft v< - ' y . .22 * ' . .:\ : f : : ’4^^' '•' ‘k* r-'V/.V-: '■ * ft . ft ^.ft •* .,'2v.- . ■*. T ' * * * *' ‘ ■* . '■’■-' '71/ yJlV' .• • .-*.*■ •I , :4^V- • ft r-- r. », -V -..ft • " •• ft • V « . • ^ *i ft*. V ft.'.* ■■.: fn ' ^ .. . . ^ ................................................................................ . ft«ft .. • •. . . ..„ V ft'., •». *■•.K.*^v '‘•ft;--i-.4.ftft.4 ¥• i <."'•■,: e- . '•■' : ■• ' • V -■ . ■• ■ ■■ ■•■ ■■••'• y'yyy-v:^^ -•* ' ft . * ■/r-t "L* ^ ftft* .. , ‘ k . *4, *» "-■■ •'• ~'^K-[ ■ ■ ‘ '’ * . j^.^* .^ft>'. •■ * r. .*S .’ :V4^ fty- • fti W . » » i ■•• •• ^ft •- -• • . • ■ .ft r- . «• . »-‘ #» . •'ft * s .' . ft V*- ..' ’ ’ * • \ . • ft . • y* ': » \t y ' y ^ . * v- ■ - . ■ ft* • ft '. * .ft. ..*. ft* *.:,•• ^ . wJ ■ ft.^ 4 /VVft •.. *,i. y< -» /7-., ■- - • iV^' 'fn Jim '<• ’■■ i..i ■. I. ifli'rtaiwiifa From: * ;»* *^J . ' .' ■ -^4 'IfW' /1\- ■i. ,T •. Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Dates April 14, 1991 Subject: #1726 Barbara and James Olexa, 995 Wildhurst Trail - Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-lB, Lakeshore residential, 1 acre minimum Fertlnent Ordinances 1. Section 10.22, Subdivision 5 (B). Side Setback. Required *» 10' Existing * 25.6" Proposed = 5' 6" Variance *» 4' 4" or 44% ■' 4t'' w Section 10.22, Subdivision 2. Hardcover. '0-75' setback area = 9,375 s.f. Allowed « 0 s.f. Proposed = 0 s.f. :A\ '•TitMi'' i- .r.-isM-i m 75-250' setback area * 13,835 s.f. Existing = 4,991 s.f. or 36.1% Adjusted Existing = 5,201 s.f. or 37.5%* Proposed « 5,292.58 s.f. or 38.2% Increased hardcover = 91.58 s.f. or .7% 1 * 210 s.f. of landscape area underlain with plastic has been included in hardcover calculation. Review Exhibit G. Section 10.03, i^ubdivision 14 (C). Lot Coverage. *4 Allowed “ 3,481.5 j.I:. or 15% Existing * 2,434 s.f. or 10.5% Proposed = 2,696 s.f. or 11.6% No variance required s • •• V-;i;SlSSf-' Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B). Average Lakeshore Setback. Please note proposed addition does not encroach average lakeshore setback line nor does area of structure proposed for second floor expansion. (Review Exhibit K.) ■ • - : -^1 ' V ; H • V iir. m .-i . i ' 5^'Vr- • .■? - '^0^^ '■■■'i,- P5 V; Zoning File #1726 April 14, 1^92 Page 2 ■ ^'S • ■- List of Exhibits A - Application B - Applicants Petition & Statement of Hardships & Findings B-1 - Addendum Correcting Findings C - Property Owners List D - Plat Map E - Neighbors' Acknowledgement Forms F - Survey of Existing Improvements G - Staff Sketch of Proposed Improvements H - Elevation I ~ Floor Plan J - Site Plan K - Sketch of Average Lakeshore Setback Line & Proposed Improvements Description of Request The applicants seek approval of a two-phased improvement project. The first phase involves the removal of the detached garage in the street yard and an addition to the east side of the existing structure consisting of a garage and covered patio. The * ^ A ^ . A m m m m ogarage is 20* x 23* and the covered patio is 8' x 20 The addition will require a side setback variance located 5' 6" at the northeast corner and as it extends southward, the addition is located 16* 4" at the southeast corner to the side lot line. There is excessive hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. Staff has made an adjustment by adding the 210 s.f. of hardcover resulting from landscape area underlain with plastic #»long the south and west side of the residence. Actual increase in hardcover is 91.58 s.f. or .7%. The following removals and additions are involved; 11' V m- Removal Detached garage * 358 s.f. Sidewalk/side « 93 s.f. Sidewalk adjacent garage ■* Former drive - 1,736 s.f. VTotal * 2,219.4 s.f. 32.4 s.f. Additions New drive * 1,562.18 s.f. New sidewalk = 110.8 s.f. Curb cut angles = 18 s.f. Garage addition =* 460 s.f. Covered patio * 160 s.f. Total « 2,310.98 s.f Net increase in hardcover « 91.58 s.f. or .7% staff has confirmed the hardcover of both the existing and proposed drives and confirms the hardcover areas as presented. The second phase of the application involves a project three years hence. Applicants propose a second story master bedroom , and enclosed porch addition over the existing garage area, h it Because of the excesses of hardcover within the 75-250' setback f ^1^^^ area, the ordinance will require approval of a hardcover variance because of the intensification of structure where a substandard condition exists.t;.s^ r?;. s ■. >- i ^ - ^■! m-- '1 1 - \*y: i '■ vt* ■ _ ■P;. — fc :V V «»••. • T’- - 5^v=^jr^ ^=P*T ■ t' fi % ■'V Zoning Pile #17?6 April 14r 1992 Page 3 Statement of Hardships and Unique Findings il Please refer to Exhibits A, B and B-1. They are noted as follows: 1.Existing garage does not meet the street setback standard of 10'. Detached garage in this area does not conform to current development pattern for homes within this neighborhood. ■1 'i f There is no hardcover within the 0-75' setback area. f ■'t The proposed addition and second story bedroom expansxon will not encroach the average lakeshore setback line.i The neighbor most immediately impacted by proposed substandard side setback has approved of the application. Isdiles for Consideration mm 2. Are there existing hardcover improvements that could be removed that would result in either no increase in hardcover or reductions In existing hardcover? Note hardcover is currently at 37.5%. 3. Can proposed addition be reduced in size? Are all improvements essential, necessity? »r Options of Action Denial ot variances as proposed, OR Approval of variances as proposed, OR Approval as amended by the Planning Commission. Any recommendation of approval must require that applicant provide a single survey with all proposed improvements prior to Council's review. Isv . iXIUHQfl 1 mm ^' Zoning File #1776 April 14, 1992 Page 3 Statement of Hardships and Unique Findings Please refer to Exhibits A, B and B-1, They are noted as follows: >i^ ■ -ft 1. * . ! r jvVfT • .-'f .• ■ ’ J Existing garage does not meet the street setback standard of 10'. Sp' ■2.Detached garage in this area does not conform to current development pattern for homes within this neighborhood. i < t-fe ^ . ^m mmm 3. 4. There is no hardcover within the 0-75' setback area. The proposed addition and second story bedroom expansion will not encroach the average lakeshore setback line. 5.The neighbor most immediately impacted by proposed substandard side setback has approved of the application. Issues for Consideration 1.Are there existing hardcover improvements that could be removed that would result in either no increase in hardcover or reductions in existing hardcover? Note hardcover is currently at 37.5%. 2. 3. Can proposed addition be reduced in size? Are all improvements essential, necessity? Options of Action Denial ot variances as proposed. OR Approval of variances as proposed. Approval as eunended by the Planning Commission. Any recommendation of approval must require that applicant provide a single survey with all proposed improvements prior to Council's review. Isv i n I'- -..'J • - ' • -'V •. . r-i^. ---------^ 4 "'y4 ^4 N'.. ift ■*<¥• > CItfy OP OROHO - VARIANCE APPLICATION /f Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) ■f ^ 1 CITY OF vUOnQ Fir^AHCE OFFICE U50200000 01 C9i 175.00 HECK TL 175.00L/f iUi^J PROPERTY RMATION Site Address Q^*f^ \^\vwE.^T* RECElFT-THAKK YOU H237S50 cool HOI TOSl Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) 03/25/9 Attach legal description to application if not included on required sgrvey Date Property Acquired ^(month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. ^ Present use of property: V residential _ _ _^other(specify) Zoning District:_ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ __— Phone (home) 'x.- - \ <rcv tL«=^,r^txe.-g. Ag A. rXJti Q.\0- Phone (work)~^ve.a.KC,^4 Address; ^>AJ^vXVvxwc,^ "Tft.- . City --------- Zip: 1 OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address:Ci t/;Zip: DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: K<^& ~^qV,Vo»^> \\vn.<v OcCator.% yo_____________-- r' .'r -I VARIANCES REQUIRED _ Lot Area Setback:I Lot Width Front Side N/ Hardcover Lot Coverage Rear Average Lakeshore Wf other (specif V)^\^ of^ Ga?>^a.«v^ mm mm Mi mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mmm ^m HARDSHIP/DBSCRIPTION of unusual property CONDITIONSm ill Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property ^conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirement^,—V|w----- Jas XL#:«i-rvo^rv>. ^^0 Kawk V . *N CA,^ r>r^ kltXn.fl (attach additional sheets if necessary) HEQUISED SUBMITTALS All of the following information moat be swhm-ttited bv the application deadline date in order for yoor application to be considered complete: 1. 2. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center • 348-3271). 3._ _Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4*_ _Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll'' for 5. reproduction). _Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll"). 6*___Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll''). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above informa-tion has not been included. A pplicant • s signature The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature'^'^f^. \JU.Date la'sh onners signature The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable ertry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Ccxnmission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner * s Si gna tur e*^i^■A ^Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. :''M- % ,Wv ■'?♦.' .1 -• •< •:- -'■ V* ■' . J •.-^]kv ipi #1 ry i '111 immm mm. ie*«:iss MU 1%. '■jMmi'k smM James and Barbara Olexa have applied for a variance for their property at 995 Wildhurst Trail, Orono. To remove the detached garage which does not meet set back requirements and replace this building with an attached 20 X 31 foot garage addition to our home. This addition will be increasing our hard cover by 136.A feet; current hardcover area being 36.1% . n .'c The removal of the detached garage will make our lot and wmmmmmm home more conforming to the flow with the homes all set back about the same, plus it will open up the exposure Ms m for 993 and 100 Wildhurst Trail. At the same time we are asking for the variance to include adding a master suite over the existing attached garage. The removal of detached garage and addition of attached garage is a 1 year plan; the master suite addition is a 3 year plan. We would like this document to represent our neighbors approval and support through their signatures. IWiii i* m-993 Wildhurst 997 Wildhurst 999 Wildhurst 1001 Wildhurst 996 Wildhurst 1000 Wildhurst tnj\y mmm mmm wimM ' ■ X •jv ‘2 i m \ <:! *!■ ti Iff ■' .-■■ ■'.Av'.li .C‘? ;• r I-®s?a^ ■" »p S’iiift* Ml a?"’:'»?;* mmmmMr James and Barbara Olexa have applied for a variance for their property at 995 Wildhurst Trail, Orono. To remove the detached garage which does not meet set back requirements and replace this building with an attached 20 X 31 foot garage addition to our home. This addition will be increasing our hard cover by 136.A feet; current hardcover area being 36.1% . The removal of the detached garage will make our lot and home more conforming to the flow with the homes all set back about the same, plus it will open up the exposure for 993 and 100 Wildhurst Trail. At the same time we are asking for the variance to include adding a master suite over the existing attached garage. The removal of detached garage and addition of attached garage is a 1 year plan; the master suite addition is a 3 year plan. K.*-* • M:i 14-; We would like this document to represent our neighbors approval and support through their signatures. i--' h-?\: ^ V .' .^-5 •..'■• •ei >.i- r *• • * p . % V- 993 Wildhurst 997 Wildhurst Wildhurst 1001 Wildhurst 99f Wildhurst 1000 Wildhurst — ~ y 0-Ci. iUnJ 1%;./ . - ■ : CTIPmmS-:v ' ■■ f- warn mmmm r*-; ?v'.- ,’v wmmfey.-" ?i’- ^.y.a ;*.! 6^'J iv>>".-’.‘--:-p^55 995 Wildhurst Trail ’.y The change in the hardcover '■iM ■; /’. Sidewalk removed (side of house)3 X 31 '* i-ttT :a' m:^ wmmm ^ ^': ...l : ■ i..'-v' ■■i<lL«rr................ Detached Garage Apron of Garage Driveway Change New garage 20 x 31 (93) (358) (32.AO) (45.02) 620. .; •'V ■>i^. .■■'m• V? Increase 91.58 Sq Ft. mm I. M I A, •V i&«li ., . jg#iil ^11 .-■ ■ V,: .\ ■«v ■ * - ; -..V - : '■; V <•' ■■: WikSimM ^^■mm - '^§M '■»>r\ = ;y .y-'Xi- >’ ,y ■t - '• ■ V ‘ ^. • -^v, :• . •* .' y'a'^ «vV..v:. •.y '»'/ ;vv, ■-•"v -. •Tr-' : - '•-''-i '- -•'•.•' ■-•• ;•■■ .- ,*•• ••■.,■- . ■ - . - ■' ' > ' % ■ ■■-f.. *> '• *v. I T* . • • •/. * -•II * <^; >**? .* ^ • , t**' ■ :> v^- 7 ■' <T>.. ^*T. • . - ' i‘v <*• ;•■: • *' V. ' ,■ ••-•• Ttf^^ v^-. • . <"; ■ *i :|-v ’M ; -H -n > •< o oa m . _ > r- 30 H H M o 3 (/>fit m m > r w ^ H 30 vj^ • > M m 30 O -O :• •.• «.. --■! *. •*■ • ■ '» •■■ •; 9 ■ .• *:•»•.’• «/• •»«;*-.. , . ■ ■ > ■ ■7.^ '• ~ ■, Jt' • ; . H O -o Z > 3C :o > X Z O 3 TJ m -0 m > 30 -< > > m z o O 30 > Oo z z z m vO Z Z O M O 0 9 nO 03 Z 4> m vO Z Z 9 ^ 9 M H 3 r- > I X * >• Z M CO M Z > O c •VJ1 (/> < > O M vn H > < X oi Oi z > C0^-4 Z z rv) ^ z . </» M >M H -4 Z z zZ U Z Z 9 O M M 9 O z m m ^ X M H H •Z r- M O C. C- > HI o ^SSS,L^ z_______VJ1 (/> Z Z m 4/4 iH H O O c/) ^ > > (/> ro Z H H C > o00 O 00 o^ Ml o C. C. o 9 9 in in o z m m 3 ni • S 9 K Z M H f f Z M M M m -M 9 Z Z 9 • in z m m H rs> in > 9$1 z rvj > M M Z oilo *•; '. ^ ■ '■ \ •■ ^ ■■; .-•: 1 .r.-* -r • ‘ . H 0 Z M 0 Z 9 Z > Z Z ^ ^ s ^>* > X z 0 > X z 0X z m z X z m z Qm > z m > z zV. -< > H m z 0 0 0 z > 0 a z > p 0s s*s g*9 %0 Z Z O 9 %0 9 9 9 9 9 M M 9 9* Z O O 9 M o gissSX H H Z M. C M %4 Z O O c ^in 9 -n -n o rs3 in H X 9 9 9 9 C9 H r- I- z M ^ Z M M H rv» Z X Z M O O 9 -f H O O 9 C » 9 9 9 > 9 9 in X C 9 m 9 Z 9 9 in 9 M M X 9 O Z M Cz w o r* Iin 9 > r- o ui H z m X 9 9 9 X C 9 H > > 3* w ^ z z c. o 9 M H o M o Z o 9 m X > jg9m . / z •d a > Hm W.V *i’- w\*» •• i- : 726 V M»» » • >■• •* -3 . .. . . ^ A 3 ^ 9 9 59999 B z f r- in 9 S? rv> 9rs>•41 X f 9 9 • Z 0 O O _ M ^ O P Z M <..V m m M z z z r- I 9 9 X X 9 M in H > > X 9 z M 9 rv>%z > M r--4 9 Z O ro iSSS X M M z C Z Z M » 9 9 r- I in 9 O M in H 9 9 X 9 9 C9 H O O Z M 9 z 9 rv> > Z Z H P g g jJ 9 ss .-Jt ■ .S ^ 090099 z 0 m 0 9 9 0 9 9 Z 0 *n o 9 in 9 O m o ^SmgS ^ 9 O Q "n M Z O Z II in > Q 9 rn n> in z Z _ 9 9 V w • V.' ■> -. J T»"-n*/^*srv .«"r 'TVil' '■5SS5- Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form 'y 1 (we) [prinx name (s )* ] • * mo r S V1 [print address] sp* i F-*- •*•*** ----- 4-v,o T^rnnnsed improvement or proposed use of the have reviewed the plans for ^ also referred to as Land Use property located at v^. M2JL.pplication w^. ,^, fasu~’ j 4.U 4- -in lavecutinq this acknowledgement, I (we) am i; I (we) understand that in disanoroval of the property or use (are) not asked to declare Council that I (we) am (are) aware of iut merely to "L propoLd neighbor's project or usethe improvement plans and that tne p e requires Council approval. .‘c jf' ;j Properi(y Owner -to,/99-,i Date Prooertv Owner Date ,...*.***.***•«******•*****•********* \ ^' f '/\\ of ^■^-1 I (we) ----1:----; ' ------------------ [print address] [print name(s)J reviewed the plans^for -e proposed ^provement^or^pr^^^^^^^^^^ the property located at . --------- Application No. _Vl2k-.caTlloa ^ — I (we) understand that in ®*®°“ting this^acknowledg use (are) not asked to declare-^pprova^ ^ Lt “o\”use but merely to confirm the c y neighbor's progect or use the improvement plans and that tne p e requires Council approval. ' (^- Property Owner Date V Date • M • • • • • • * > • - , • a. ■*.>,« r-f-hv in the review of If you have any f“"“comments to the Building S this Land Ose *PP^^°*taon, p scheduled meeting date.zoning Office at least 10 days prior t i:- ■- Ktili iftltWifflas W'" ^ Af?' (O',a- a * / gw 77 i «/ a I I /■ “■ Wr. >.r, * ^‘ Adjacent Property Owners* Ac3cnowledgement Form y ' • * • T (uet'^Ajin 7- C-K«?,.\ of 9flL)a~S/^T l/lA/L^ [print name (s)V ^ ^ aadressl ■ V iv:.; ■.' h,TTe reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at <?9i-t>^'^r'nzAlU also referred to as Land Use Application No. V"\‘"kW< I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) noraskerto declare approval or disapproval of U-.e property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council t'*or the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s pro:ect requires Council approval. Property 0 Date * v" _ ,4j Prop^^ety owner Date A. have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or pproperty 'located at 7>^ . also referred to as Land Use Application No. IH-Xd- • « (we) understand that in executing this Lt merely to confirm for the City Council that « the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s progec- or requires Council approval. Property Owner Date 3- ^9 Tuap^JPty Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the 6 this Land use Application, please submit your "T®"'’-® zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting da . - . a o' & i • 1 / 3 ' '-^ Adjacent Property Owners* Aclcnowledgeinent Form [ print nafne (s) ][print address] m.■^f- : have reviewed the plani for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Application No. \’l ^ I understand that in executing rnis r Cak) noVasked to declare approval or disapproval or the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the movement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use ^ requires Council approval. Property Owner Property Owner Date I (we)'A U\av,a of [print namazs)] aadress] have reviewed the Pl«n= ^ the proposed improv^ property located at n—. * Application No. ¥ *; r 4l mm I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we. am (are) not asked to declare-approval or disapproval or tne “ lut merely to confirm for the City Council ^hat I (we) am (are) aware » the i^proLment plans and that the proposed neighbor's pro^ec- o- use requires Council approval. I > Property Owner Date 7/2^/ ■ > ••<: property Owner Date |F If you have any information that may assist the Jilting j ?this Lnd Dse Application, please submit your co^ents thejuildtng zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meet..ng • - ^ ll H # X I b jj ’ii ■ ►,•••■> -j; .i ^ ■ ':: - ’'-'<■ tt^ *-* ; ^ _ • • a. ‘ - i'■I I (we)«' Adjacent "property Owners* Acknowledgement Form v'^ /I La-m rtv-'V of 1 co^ AoWv^ [print n2Line(s)j \ [print address have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at . .referred to as Land Use Application No. V~t^. ^ T fwe) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) an # * \ a. vaa/1 4-0 declare approval or disapproval of the property or use (are) not ask £q_ the Ci^y Council "that I (we) am (are) aware of 'Ts rm^rovem^nt "p'l\™ and that ;L proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner^ ^ ■■. - Date Property Owner Date •t**************************'^'*‘****^**** \ v3 A C» \ V.of ^ ^ [print name(s)][print address] s- nlans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the have reviewed the plans for tne pro. . referred to as Land Use property located at ■vCv\)i\..vi7-V>r - -iso re-e--e Application No. - I (we) understand that in executing this use (are) not as)ced CounVA"thlfl (wel am (areVaware of i thri^rroveren^plaTs ^nd'that iL proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date 3hXo Property Owner a 3(zS'/<?Z Date ^ If you have any information that may assist the ^* ”ia2ng°* this Land use Application, please Zoning Office at least 10 days prior -'A % • • ■'.?.*jS Mffrfh Une ifi* ^£. '4- •’’ \ MU •/If. fff: Sec. 7, 7T //: ■ ■', ■■ ■ ■ •' .-V , ■■- -mr/jL. mzM “. • .' ri: ■v'« WM f ■■'' '■ ■T ■ <i. ^-..-J-. h- ■ ■r#54*^'' i !• • V ■ ,M WILDHURST ■••‘5 gg**Qfa‘ ///,nr> TRAIli Re.\/iseJ ■ ^ SouHf Une ffr* S.t.k. ^ MW. 0f^ Sec. 7, TJr7, R. 2s Sfrccrf, Uh'liiy onW 0/oino^e DEMARS . GABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC i iMraoy cartHy that tfie is a trua »td corract rvpraoantatior of • suvay ol UM boundariM of ttw auova daseribad UnO and of »«o loeaUon of al bufcinga, if any. thwaoa and af viaiM afcroacnmaqia. if am*. *ftwn or on saai land. na Na 7m -3 PtymouttV MN 5S447 Phon« fei2) 55»-OdOa rad by m ns «//Ta____(Jay of A/pf/erioer . 10 ££. Mmn. Bag. f*o. 90u>i:^ 257-(ij // ^= -5^' %1L • 'i inTTiii S£ av r „ ii '-.VVV. •’! ■w « \ I V •tl It •■f ^ ■ -V ■>*-» .*. -• ■'i >Si '■■*Py ; ;.t- >r ir •v.^- :-i... ■7#■ ••. '.7"V ~ ktik • * '• » I . •• ••*ftf -•: .riV fj — ;f V ■;.!spi • t - • ■• ■- A ImsM** .- ....1 •« r ’ ^:‘ ■ ■ • ’n— U= m%fO- ’ ' -i' r^|l *»im¥nSf ‘ r''— f 3 ’’^ .:: ' V*-< % ■'V >..?;■ ■ii. y-Or ,*• - nT '?> . ft y ^ ^IU.5 '■!<0S^' V 1 iMi^: ■:'\-or-<,.:Q fe;. *)l C *^^; . " „r;r- (5f * •■ :. •• '■•"V • : ., m *;; ■■ ■ - ^'.r^H f ;.j;v-:. . '•p* ±=i / •| I—.1 '•»** i:.’*«r. r 1 •. -^-11 '?i-i ; V S. M B S n E!. A R P-: o L E X A R: I- ^ I Vir^i Iffc^. rr.j •••*•*• ••^ •■w. , mm — ■■■II rn^m 1 h ..... . rr, • c i:- r )^ It ST /Ow (? « ? f: T j- R % sf ■'■ ■k * ih^- ■I ^ P; it'-e I? ^ !■ >’tr 6: ,4:.^:.-r.^. \ \ t;v'l;I j?:^ f f .'>V V---- 4 / \/u >1..- Il I ■ -< ■ ■ ■ K :; ■ -V ;r''rly ‘;rf? -'f; vl -^-^hrllSitor^n / .;»• I . .•J •i •v3 vr. > 1.:.4 ..■ ' .1 A^' •:^ir «&=-To Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator April 15, 1992 #1728 Draper and Molly Jaffray, 540 Barrett Avenue - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-IB Required = 2 acres Existing = 38,700 s.f. or .88 acres Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) - Front street setback variance required for proposed addition to principal structure. Required » 50' Existing « 14* 5" Proposed « 25' Variance =25* or 50% I I.>iW 7 MfmK Lot Coverage Facts Total lot area = 38,700 s.f.* Allowed = 5,805 s.f. or 15% Proposed = 1,667.69 s.f. or 4.3% Applicant has legally combined Lots 19, 20 and 21. Lots 16, 17 and 18 have not been combined with homestead parcel. Lot coverage standards have been based on legal combination of all six lots as one homestead. Lot Coverage Facts Based On Existing Homestead Area = 19,350 s.f. Allowed = 2,902.5 s.f. or 15% I m r.• -c ^ IJ.8t of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Designation of Shoreland Area E “ Sewer As-built Plan F - Existing Floor Plan G - Neighbors' Acknowledgement Form oposed Site Plan evation/North . ■‘i.: wmW'W r IdA; wm:. V W. 5?^ ','V ■A ■ Zoning File #1728 April 15, 1992 Page 2 Description of Request Applicants propose a 20' x 22' addition to the north side of the existing residence. The addition will be two and one-half stories. The first level will be a two-stall garage. As of this writing the City has not received revised floor plans for addition. Applicants had originally proposed a detached garage and vacation of Barrett Avenue. With the filing of the application, applicants have withdrawn the vacation and have oroceeded with an addition to the existing residence (review ^Exhibit I). Applicants have been asked to submit floor plans for amended proposal. The plan will be included in your final packet or presented by applicant at your meeting. As already noted above, lot coverage standards have been based on the six lot area totaling 38,700 s.f. This is an RR-lB zoning district requiring two acres in area for each residential unit. The property is served with sewer. Major access to the property will remain via barrett Avenue but access to the proposed garage will be via the 12’ alley to the east side, review Exhibit H. Because of the steep topographic limitation to immediate north of residence, the City will ask for detailed grading and drainage plans with the formal submission of building plans for addition. Applicants have not advised as to the future status of the existing garage adjacent to alley. This structure is in serious disrepair and applicants should be questioned as to whether it shall be removed with this proposed construction. It appears to currently be used for storage. Note structure does not have doors. Although Barrett Avenue and alley function as private driveways, the City does maintain both Barrett Avenue and alley. It is staff's understanding that the alley is maintained at least up to the existing garage on the Jaffray property. i'. Review Exhibit E. The sewer "as-built" shows a sewer line running along the south lot line of Lot 16. The City Attorney's office has been asked to determine if the City has received an easement for this area of the project. If an easement has not been granted, the applicants will be asked to grant access and utility easement along the southern lot line of Lot 16. F-:Eardship Statement Please review Exhibit A. 'I?*' rA y,- Mi ■v"; • V ’V J .A..' • A \ 1 -• •• ■« • ■ «M«. ■ ■ ■' fc-r.^5 # April 15, 1992 Page 3 mn'- V-' • Zoning File #1728 i :;, ■ .; •- -c Staff Comments . • .< * . • ■• ■ !s iii«staff must ask that any condition of approval include the following conditions: f'jspp^.,1.Legal combination of the three separate parcels with the homestead parcel. Provide grading and drainage plans with construction plans at time of application for building permit. Upon resolve of sewer easementissue, applicants may be asked to grant access and utility easement over sewer line adjacent to southern lot line of Lot 16. Removal of existing garage and based on final determination of staff, possible need for masonry wall along west side to remain because of need to support adjacent bank. ■A, ie ■* - ■>■. j mw^: --V V'. toggle;’-'^':, .r h,^ i .1 'i '■■.to pIP’ . ■. »■' MMi 1^:': -t ; .. V ^ ’ 1 n''’ : (r r 1 iVV'5 V - (rJ wmmmmM plipsi r: ■ ^ rr:;. m i * ;v ’ BPSV:.,v - :.{hr:, f jf. ;, ■-1 ■• %; V-.. , ** -ia*. ^-h 0‘:.-V-1^? . Br-'v fi ■ -J rii ■ f. ■ -S*., V' -/ "lA > = » - ■- t.-. m'WSmm ."' 'n'=;i' • ;-v.’ j ■;r'- ■■■>. ■•: IS ■«» ■;'^7.:^>.*;-,V;.- f'.; » •; I: fi CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION ~ •Z.C' pm Initial Application Fee $1J5«.0.Q.. {$50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) 1)y- Oi ^.v. .3 t PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address A\yt 0fcY\6 Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) //*7~^3• 3/ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Datfif>Property Acquired_ _ _ _/O/_ _ _ _(month/year) 1 ^o|(''^^&) also own the adjacent parcels of land./(/'<^/ Preset u^eof property; X residential _ _ _other (specif y) Zoning District; R-l_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1350200000 01 CEH CHECK TL ___RECEIFT-Wm YOUmsooo coot Roi Ton: 03/27/9 175.00 ^50.00 APPLICANT t-' r I WiM ^ Name Dtt>pp^"nrv^ \SAi\J C5^\ppfq\^______ Address;04r> •______ _ City; O kct ^o Phone (home) Phone (work) 's33'*' Zip:55d22 — rf b /' OWNER (if different than applicant) Name £(Lm^ . nUmV ._ _ _ Address; _ _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone (work) h-city;Zip: DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estiiu id Construction Cost $ ^ Describe request in detail: ■1 c/Cl X ^ t Esi. r h VARIANCES REQUIRED ^fc^fcrS^^Lot Area __ _ _Setback; Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Front Side Rear _ _ Average Lakes^^ Other (specify iZ? ' . * IMtDSBIP/DBSC3UPTI0N OF OHUSUAL FROPERTY >.X)IIDITIOHS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unu.siial property conditiqns preventina compliance with Zoning Code requxrements_ _ _ _ (r\0»^nV^'.>prCr d . h>VV| f>s Or^t MiVlC^^ .___________ k^r.. "T^FlrTit: “^*AsarniiiT' rfriiea —I < Jl . V. - T.^«st^ SiAv-"kifc< 'V L»"- R] (attach additional sheets if necessary) IRED SUBMITTALS All of the followincr information must be submitted by the application deadline date 't" order for your application to be considered complete; 1. 2. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance^A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. -^Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. X Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy S^j^xll" for reproduction). 5. _ _^Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8Ji"xll"). a;-: • 6. 7. \S)cetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8J5"xll") _ _^As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8*_ _^Additional items as may be r-*quested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance applicat-'.on is not complete if the above information has not becui inclnded. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. . ^ Applicant's Signature Date 3' OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges c>^d agrees to this application and further City Staff, consultants, agents. Commission rjembers, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature 0 Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Ccmmisslon Meetings are held on the iflfteidti^onday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled ann-tng Ccmmi1 ■» If an applicant is unable to attfehS^^Scheduled meeting, pleas^Sfake arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ■ mm ■•Sr.: ' t - I-..- - 4 ■t 1 r«' .» t : . -■ k -.^l ^V 5^. 4-V4J i* A •• • .•••. 6 " .* • Y' <» (I) ' ** ?» • N ll M 1^iflOZ) t ^ kVi 'i •A'« , iw) ,' *^’ • n ^ i *4t) - »i ® flSCJ tl ® *f « : » /./ i/if—-|5 < '* 1 x’tiK.^ i H ‘^/’sft ‘1"’ H h ..w.' 1l\ « 'bI >0i M r fi Ttn if 7K \ idD«.a.«ii. ^ • \ i Sl» “TTTTT” t‘ «^y\“ i6i j; - ri ^ Toi) ^ (ih ^ fi ^ « (^^) - Al ® 8 A “Tcrr: tl *' ^ S 9 L^! * =‘V > 9 f ^ . ^ r S '»{>"'u » < 1 (cn »/(9i')„ ft wi n 1 A 1 KFk .i < f \ i *. / M i/I W / « N N0SN3>lDia ■w Sign's rwiWiiB ^l JOO'B (I iq; ril J 'MM I Hi ^,Vf i> ( Ki V '*< §1 i .,-•■ (I > _ ^ . f # ..^ i^r;V«^9|gH f***-''-^* *if%* . .. V mmmMim I . ' • V. T i-U.JiWWW'l' I ills lii > s i^’a 9 ill TlI ^5*> > m z o o z > o o Z ^ » m T> I -i 2III N < > m o z o 9 Oo;o > » _a 9 >a oPO jjt 9 9 O ^m m M o» gs332o S3cu r Oi >A ' : s M 9 H H g ^M M s I \H >oM M (/> U4 ^ ^4 iSiii illi”? jissi' ;;lS§i ss< o O Q» N-«-SV z m •» o oH > r* _ rs>> Z 9 I (/) ^ m m o VM is,‘-it: m . (/> 9 Po o o C H a a r>» ^ z z M s Ml inU4 M r- Z I ► m f F rj < M m Q inin m c/> M zin n w inin z n > M>o M ^3= oo M in in 9 in HMo M ir fV»9 in in M o oM O . V ::a. ^ g C- c. g in z oQ Q •» a I 9 »o o» > m in M Z in X in > > ^23n> O < ni 5 Mz 9 !• V ^' ■>: ' $ $ » O 9 ^ M 22 ui o o e ^ tn ?« s » o M f? - - M M g 9 z 9 KMjjoginN 9 99 m » Z Z MOH 5 < 9 9 rs) 3* iZ Q m M M z M 2 Z f- r- > M 9 r- r- Z I> H ni m r* fs» < o z o in 9 m z z o g ^ g z z o o H 3S M c. (. I ^ m z z g in S^ig5:» ^ -® ;^o- 3 ?r*f-mz o M ^ ^ ^ M n M M o in in X Z zin > 9 9 g in 50 g g z M^ o z z g _ M z o So H Z M > O M Zo is®*^§sgozxj ipi ”Z H H _ M **iii5 01 o in 5 z z S M 2°88So Z m m > o0 9 9 9 0z z o in zo i '■ i.#-*r T ,,f.•r^< e»Sm Z in z z o in SSk^-SS mm iiiii- O 9 S ' 4 -*• IX o $ in \MinN IS» -V -•t * . * m z .;; **v. A ^ 'f* * ■ .* 4.^, * V, '-.-/ •» \ ^ '• f'> .... ,. .-•••.. '.Ivc ■*■■■ *•- , ( V ' ■ r ' ^ # ■" c * ■.f- ■ ,. f • i‘ ■ ‘ , ( I V,vv "k.» 1 V- V ;'r2 jw« • i -V r Iff® ^m mo Vi o:siii</) 9 g o o H O fr-l§ ■r ;t; JM^ ::-'^^:',;3...; • * ■- r- (/) >ig!;l Sa Ko ^■'v- it"'r tv ;(,^' ^ V *' m < q» o o M fii^SSSo ifi** 7. R u _ M 2 (A OOP- H a » 1-4 > M CP ^ S M S C3 M m 9 m M “ m r" n I » I- ?< M m pr VI Z \ji o o o Vi> ^ » o o V P m c. o oH > s » l» » -. I» Z •»! M 2 m XI p M2 H :. > > -M H > ^ P f ■f •<' -tt p rv > P P Vi S iS > z ^ Vi Vi •< _ M M Os 5; p ? TV p -J H O W OX OP Vi m > o ^6 Vi 9 p p o no rv Q S ^ * 2 ^ X > M m p a ^ p P o Ip n o ^ ^p p p p m p P POP ^ p H I P w p p p _ M P -H -1 O P OX op P P > o O Vi _ P P P O Op roisl« P P ^ o p n o M p ^ p p p p p p Vi POP 9^ P H X P P ^ r- p p M §1* p pM s p - P P X o P > P M Op -< O P P P N P P W X r- o o H > P fV iSSS|5 _ • r |n m X p ►- p p p M O o p S4 #17 V .' o r. r V. •. r- M r* M P ^ o o X X > > p X p > >r-o o si IM >•;S p p X X M M:k 7k p p p p o p o p p v« 0 IN* 1 X M P ^ P I ^ P P M OO rs» P P C. C. O P fs> > > O P P Q O O P P O no IV -< o S 2 p ^ *15^ > p p *< >a *1 coo > M p IP M X P M > > -V •< X IX P »• P P ^ P M ciS^o > rv p rv pI iS •< N o o o o p > X X p H H i** P c o X > p 3 P P P X P P P P vO M C > > > -< X P X p p p ..I > p p X 0 p 1 M M P I P P P M O O P P .* S!55gSc > » o > H H P n p prri 5 P o p I I X I Hs? O I O O X P p p p p X X X (/I P H W P .> . O '^.• X O pp ^ '•WV P X ■ u • '.»■ » .i V- • ■^. • V s s ■i ■••a i. .., /.. «i i. » * •; *’ * - .•• V, ■* * f ' ' ‘!»V.‘’ '-t . , . .* • *.- ••■i - • •• ■ -^ I ’ V •- •* ; ::***- r . i - ■' # ►. «~ % • ■«>. • •*■ .r .’# 11,1 fir? ...- • 11 f - fe«iit V ■ .^': V 'trfr-.v.i^S.. -IL • VkiM i f ■ ■ * b , r-'. , V .• • t::a: ■ :.€¥© ■ ■ ■ VC •V ’, V .'■ m ^0»M^ m •D O 5 X * ^ •*-..aw^£ivf^^ ^•". •55 i't :.:v3 f ■'.•V •••\N--5-v ..... rmrnm L'.' mmM j!;':;'^^'. ■ v-v. r, ‘ '• •. ■'.«: . ft. •-' ■ ■ 2i 3**="=ss m •»lS H nt ■ V ^ 9 -4" « - 4» • • « •...r ■ K •V. ii > -i' ' '.'Tt. , .V: ''4 r" V* '. - ■» \ % • - '!■ - • •• * ♦ >' > ’.•;«W.1^ •• % . ..’ r .\ ^3V .- - i "T •>V, ^ ' L • .- ' •i-f .f * / • ■? V *!V- ■' I ;j‘7^ "• •* * f-V . ■ 4 •* • ', . wl ,:g£ ..: . ' . W ■ . -. ./: . •’. >; — .^ ■ . 4.' :v i-;- ■’" •.■ 7- -:v^- |."r . ,f? ::v ■ . .,.; • ' . K. 'I;.-“^IF • 4^. . .‘4 -'^V •'•’■ . * ■ ■:. » ■. ■“, , 4 ; - - 4- .;>^r ■ ■ / *v* **■ '•»V . r • t A- . .♦ •>. • ♦ ' 4. >••4S. ■' ►- / • ■ #;#■ V :.i. ^ .^1 •» "i T-' i?.Jj?.”5f .. . i. • • • •>.'i -.f ^*A • . •, .fe;- • .fi*.■My:- * .i- 'J?JH^' % ♦. . ' .V «v «w ♦ ■ ■ ■■ M'y ^ >•'. ?»^ -1.*. • i • «-ft ' r*» # -k i*. - 3. ^ , ■ Hf- .Jk '. < .• , 'I• T -1^ . - ..'• mm ■f li tllniii^^iililil^illilfifli r- ' r.f.-*ORCHARD ROAD 1^ .',wtf.rf;.^''‘ i 3 1r~ 1 J w-5 oiaoLJg IT D* • 0P~^ 1 ra-fv)o-r ♦ ro ' rol f\3 ro OJ^ -^•-Kir\>. -4 .'oTj^ O) ' ^ac5il 6?hsot.ra-l E: ■ 3_ ~|_LTr^ 'S' ■ -fro o> r\ji f\)Iro OJ‘ 4^ # 1 I'® sr; ^ o^' NLONi 1~:AVF at ' oTT-fc l 01 NE : AVE. CO j~r 00 ^£ —rv) > 5 i^^• » • ■ PV •«> BDS;- t / f ------1me|E1•» ^ ■•'.'V • t« SOUTH \ \ \ A 0 ’W?,. •^4;*■■z.. »■( •• - - - - 1.- • » • • . ^ ^ L. -i^ — - '^^oo«i • ' OecK "-lii;f I S«4««^ I ifct-crt i'^‘ f{.-‘-v ‘- ■ :" ■' '»'"v.-' 'C . ;• ' i-t "'^' ■ '■ ■■“V, _____ .. i»* 4». :: -’I- •■ 1 l?kwl 1'''« aSTH Uouii^ 0«&«eoM Pad'll 6 3^ ;s.u.istv . *^>LU Ecii^dvr ..$i \tT picoR.^LacI ^/coR- • -®?;V '•> 'I- ,;■ "fjf" H * 0 ii . ':mt-':Wks^-.i sW*^. Ji' Plat Map \ n z7^ Sia^^iUM •• >J ^>r-^. ;• -^4 IM* ^ 14 ! *»«i ^ V‘ “ *1*) ■•S. 1 ^. ■ •' J-f\ * -*o ^ •(5V It S\‘ ■ • ^\% A-’• OV , • i ■ '•! If * i/i 1 ;?.M« DICKENSON - iO^Y t - • w •• (jft 44 • 'd ^ - Adjacent Property Oiraers* AcJcnowledgement Form [print name(s) 1 j ^ *h» olans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property Tocated at hU-------- referred to as Land Use Application No. . . „a.r...nd .».t 1» •”»«« «“ (are) not asked I (we> am (are) aware of ^e rmr-verenrp^rs ^°n'd\^%f tL proposed nei.hhor-s project or use requires Council approval. V '■ Property _ _ _ _^ Date 05 ^2. property Owner JluU ^ Date ************************************** 1 (we)of [print name(s)] "i ‘[print address] Lve reviewed the plans for the proposed property located at ■ Application No V j *-^-nA ♦■Viai* in executing this acknowledgement» I (we) am I (we) understand that in execuT^j. y ^ r%T-nntfirtv or use (are) not asked -o Lars of but merely to ^ ,L ^^nnosed neichbor's project or useDUC merexy uw ‘'r. .^at the proposed neighbor's project or usethe improvement plans and that ~ - - — requires Council approval. p I! ■ ■ 'Vi?. ii v\ i V' ;i property Owner Date m.- Property Owner Date If you have yout*co^tnt“ to^"th\‘‘*Buirlng°f Zon^"ng‘offi=e* *^1^^" 10 da"ys prior to the scheduled meeting date. ’ ' ■- V'‘m i .... Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Pom G 4 pf; ,ZUrSrN l/KAkJ^ iHAgri ^ ^ ‘ [print address][print name(s) J j 4.V, slants for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the l\. 5YO -------------- also referred to as Land Ose Application No j e a. J -in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am . I (we) understand that disapproval of the property or use (are) not asked to declare Council that I (we) am (are) aware of but merely to ^ that^the proposed neighbor's project or usethe improvement plans and that me p p requires Council approval* —-— ■■ ity Owner Date Property Owne Date ^,^,1,^********************************** i7>g I (we)of [print address] p.... 1..». p“ .“*..1, property located at--------------------—^--------— Application No j V ^ -i-'rtaj- in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am i I (we) understand tnat in of the property or use , (are) not asked Council that I (we) am (are) aware of but merely to confirm ^ proposed neighbor’s project or usethe improvement plans ana that the proposea requires Council approval. .. :■ ir Ji- ^ __ __ property Owner Date '•r ' < AT.-Lls- - -- Hi-•f li: Property Owner Date If you have yout'cc^entV to Bu”rd!n^ fonrng*0«ice 10 days prior to the acheduled meeting date. ^ ^ r* ; Adjacent Property 0-ners* Aclcnowledgenent Form I (we) [print name{s)J of <n ^ [print address] fh» nroDosed improvement or proposed use of the Application No.CaUJLWAl , .,— . I,.., .... 1. (are) not as)ced to declare ®PP" Council^that I (we) am (are) aware of but merely to proposed neighbor's project or use the improvement plans and that the p P ^ requires Council approval. § / ^ J 'O U (k-J' ' Owner \\ Date Property Owner Date I (we) Ajt/P_ ^ [print name(s)] [print address] ^ ^ +-hf» oroDOsed improvement or proposed use of the Save reviewed the plans for JL- also referred to as Land Use property located at - - - - Application No I (we) understand that in ®*®‘=“‘^^|53p„®ovax”of ^the ^property or use (are) not asited to declare-approval ^ I (we) am (are) aware of iut merely to confirm proposed neighbor's project or use the improvement plans and that tne p v requires Council approval. irty(^Propert Vv gwa.Date ner . «■ / . - ’gffipAiafcIP Property Owner Date IJ you have any information that^may =“\fth\%u"rdtng"l ^onrn^Offi^* a*ri<fa'sV lo"da"ys prior to the scheduled meeting date. ' ' Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form W’ I (we) /■ '/yyl m • AIP [print ■ X-» a 1 o the oroposed improvement or proposed use of the have reviewed the plans for also referred to as Land Use property located at -----------0f\\ ( —C------- Application No r.w, I i=M nq ot nem.'.n r,iS^-i4A£0 tJ. ■'.rs-. -1 I sxw. .. .1-^ j 4.1,^x4. in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am . I (we) understand that in ex disapproval of the property or use (are) not asked to declare council^that I (we) am (are) aware of but merely to confirm tL'^proposed neighbor's project or use the improvement plans and that the propo requires Council approval. / /) Properr^OWhe^~ Property ✓7 fc»‘ Owner . Date **.«*•♦*»»*»•••*•***••**** I (we) - - - - - - - [print name(s)J of % . *■have reviewed the plans for the proposed i"P-/--,\r,//erto as“ Land Ose property located at ------■■ ------- ' Application No but merely to confirm ^ prooosed neighbor's project or use the improvement plans and that the propos requires Council approval. :1 ■•r- #•< ffu i property Owner r * ^4. Date r'*; Wi Property Owner If you have any “"t'cc^en'^'^o "th\'‘BuUdtngl I ‘onrng*0«rce ^^leasl lo"da"ys prior to the scheduled meeting date. 4^: 7^ jtM mmm Adjacent Property Owners • Ack^l^genent Form ' \L.'A ’ A of A^^rr\^(^r^4 V^'>. ^ I (we) 'Xn A^A\ —-— . ^ ~ y\lA^\ [print address] [print name(s)] Application No *'■ A 4.k«4- ^n executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am ^ I (we) understand that in e^ disapproval of the property or use (are) not asked to declare ^PPJ^° Council^hat I (we) am (are) aware of but merely to confirm proposed neighbor's project or usethe improvement plans and that the proposea requires Council approval. \•• \ \ \ Aig Property Owner « Datje Property Owner Dat !•* A' • - I (we 1 "1 T-^£aCa\____ [print name (s) ] ******...*»»*****************^******* n rVgs^C!:: [print address] ^ ^ - fr,r the oroposed improvement or proposed use of -he have reviewed the also referred to as Land Ose property located aty _.--------- Application No m- I (we) understand that in (are) not asked to Councii 'that I (we) am (are) aware of but merely to ’'that tL proposed neighbor.'s-project or use the improvement plans and that the p P .. .. ^ .. requires Council approval. ^ ' J J *' /i Property Owner property Owner '.V- I qo Date * .Ti...*p“»»• i 1. i.-AildaftL. .^4- ■ «^'-' I (we) Mjacent Property Owners- Acknowledgeaent Form LTi of STO Ofo /)izx I-IAAJ K 0— [print address] Hi [print name{s)l properV/Toceted referred to as Land Ose mApplication Nowauxwii — j i.u»4. in **5cecutinq this acknowledgement, I (we) am I (we) understand that in _ disaoproval of the property or use (are) not asked to declare Council that I (we) am (are) aware of but merely to confirm project or use the improvement plans and tnat tne p f requires Council approval. Property Owner ^^^*********************************** ->•! cstiL ,riC I (we) _------------------T-Pf[print name(s)j (print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed as“" nd vTe property located at Application No (ace) not nskad '= Council'that I («a) “t ,*”oc*uU but merely to confirm ^proposed neighbor's progeot or use the improvement plans and that tne p p requires Council approval. ^ ^ ^ -^ 1 ^ O Q h i • .f <t '-■4 Date P, ■ ■ ■ . Property Owner Date ■li you hat. any ““0“. «“ n?V ”w"«°^ S“!nrom‘' ari“aVt'tr;a',:"“.r to t.a aon«u..d ~.ttn, data. liMII ■ ■■■Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement Form 1 (we) HciO^tZf' '(■ f=Ki'.iPkAjPlv-'' of /y'il l-l flfJI G [print name(s)][print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at ____________________ also referred to as Land Use Application No. _____. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor’s project or use requires Council approval. F t*'.. Property Owner ?-^v - <=^&- Date 3-3-^-93- Property Owner Date ******************************** mmm (we)A rVl irhpi of s?37 (print name(s)] [print address] . • ’' I ^ ■* have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the | IV property located at Application No. ____ also referred to as Land Use I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare-approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval.,/ Cf cr"xu»-:sr hTf !*.* .y /•/ Ki-« . ^ / U J^ * •' V*, . ^ V - <0 a Property Owner Date 3-34-°13— Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. wmrn i VC V ii .•;fi Ji ^-tiu .a 9 • s ^ ;s*i5 - ?jS-. 2*5;i; t--4:’a S i lir ifniijlllnnK iiii!; ■“ I i •1 n I] jlB> liit”i iliniFiiji !if!;iiilj|jii1il ! • J iil!i i»s j? li?; '! -} Jill] •- rlt:3 j .255L 1< jxt -Q.2B 3W 928^ W 92aos 315- 8* • ot 0.96% izz*.:: p C — 4-Jci0- *t "/7Ji , \ WALLACES (52) ^0 the (45) MH 22K_ (44) t*S$' <*» iJr, ' VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA • ^ BEACH E5{5i^f:i^HEesaz;S£EHEEEl-: Hlttgl0Ei3E£EPItAGr :J ,.- -t'. ^■;- V O -- Tit*' '■_ 'S- ’ r -■ tif ~ t rt 226 mnSSSfeM .1 t 2 « 0 0 ) north star realty CO. I I t 7'fir fi ^/f r PC 5U O ♦ rns,a u *J ■ ^/*f/li ; . r ■ ■ ;:J^ ,0^ V*. . *y<?»rt ^0 ri*ly ;.,r.': I L^^al(ki*',5^WtjJ5 I *rvf'it " “.''r.-r- • . «J» ■, • f - -,i ./■.■j/* iT 9^ *■*** W0 *'\^’ > V"* ' -0 '■. ''f.#/-i .*• *■ ^ ‘'V*.-'•' -:'■■■ ’‘^“•i'fv€i' ■i^. f'rtty 3V0 m .^0- ".'i V . '*‘*f ,-^ \'Aa V inw 4.1 •'*i'’ 3 .V.r V ^ . \ • • ‘* , 01 : %* llVlM(» I,’ I- nargHg^J > 'i fiaf •uie^ ^li < > e# MH»yp^ •f •■ .-• ■ ..i ;i f I -I I 1 m ^-^.^Jttrn 'f ^ ,j^ m S«5S£f ’ ■-.jai'.” I ccS ;5»- cil l^S -csr'V ;r.r-r V •%iaM <0 W-3* V -w- v/ ^j*>(,ti '■A ___s » ;1| *Mli |r:i?Iss-e? - ;«fell ■1 i ^1* jjiri tli!^i5 . l lluliiU'iiliK fJ <*.••«•_ IPW L - . -C.” 'H,MM 'M^£>SX m I I 1' -stiaaiB ks ii, ■ ikI! w Ir.ii K»imi r.it !^j!SSI !i! }i =Ji| ii^ii?ijii|in jlll-‘lllllil I iniMIJHilll im ^ ^ t ^ ’T' ^ m, ------ I 1“ mm. 1 ■ ^ S \ ^ 1. S;f< -■■ ' ■ m. ''sdK ✓tr* • I — ■■ :• ■r^I ¥^ 9> *7 - -— , ^ v_j I'-^f I »•WBWII«kfe-v' Hw^..v... • % T ^ V ir% :»r-; ; .21 sr “.c - . .„.’ .Jl” p-Sv"-“2 Sfe: WSrTTTSSTrTS^Sr^TTr-?^ S Mml 5# ##*#«■•>, ^ ^ V'-»i7 V> *-^- »/7-»<. MC Itt fi •f tteN , rr J SSSf J sss■ wmmr t ^ mh 117. to l« cte Smitoto* mi Tltto Bi. »JMC to • mt cto_______ Qtortor aC Cto 7. •C to Kto ■>111 tto I iMlW £srr..p?nM M af IMBCWDI MKA: (Uaatli) (WMl) WKIM '^&Rcr«t« Mils wi stato CoacraU Maak k<1« Hack ratalaliif mII Sara«a NaaM Maalaatar llrtka* Sravaf BrfwSv to ttoatl a LSHfl ratal «3:S:' '■ *3:S: - _ V -j__, Hat ITM to. ft.V t Araa 4N1 •«• rt. I. r. ^ aat - > ir aS*la kMa toaoa^ tssa* ilaal SA B & 9-n*-P ^’ • l n . tto*/9.Ma ,4m toy ^ tto • «r ---------%----------1 ---■----X 4-n-»? ukNDiummBac: a« « .iiacMtOL.-•• <L_ LD aa* M« •» 7m-» trr-i,3 PREPARED FOR JAMES a BARBARA O'LEXA I I 23 5 *^1 ■/ 1- •• ■» ..;■ '".i"; V'- ■:.";^ ' , ■ ■ ■'^'' • '-'Ml ,» »^ O 1 p.tf. /»»y^ A %i’‘' w ■■ llmij i-^P' T - ’\ p. ^ ' ■■■■■(■ ■’.i €1 P- "■' V'^> ::pr*ioe-TiSElo» fSSipEjr^ Kc’ijjf J&efpay --■-'------ ~z::— gc^t^ '/-»" •