The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03-16-1992 Planning Packet-i V V feV^ ?j';' kfr:i'.'; i'V^‘ ■ f ■ ■?ppr«^| ijiiUJiiiiiui . JiiJi!wnUMMPP'"i.'!'^11 PLAimiliG COMH1SSIC3N MEBTHIG MONDAT, MARCH 16, 1992, 7:00 P.M. 1275 BRCNN ROAD SOOTH - COUNCIL CHAMBERS '■" / • .<>v. '•'*'. ■'J- COOHCIL REPRESENTATIVE - Gabriel Jabbour ATTENDANCE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING "0 : ;;i 1. 7:00 p.m. #1716 Clifford L. Otten/Timothy W. Otten, 3740/3800 W. Wayzata Blvd. - Preliminary Subdivision 2. 7:45 p,m. #172.1 Albert Hanser, 1685 Fox Street - Preliminary •* rr • • _• Subdivision 3/?8:00 p.m. An Ordinance to Repeal Ordinance #96 Second Series "An Ordinance establishing an interim mcrc^.torium on the granting of land subdivisions that have rot received preliminary approval from the City.” ACTION ITEMS - Review of these items will commence prior to or ^ between scheduled public hearings. ■mmi: V'V -r;-/ Applicants presenting variance requests before the Commission are ashed to move to the podium at the front of the Chambers when their application is announced by the Chairman* 4. #1717 Lawrence W. and Arliss A. Gadbaw, 699 Minnetonka Highland ^ Lane - Variance - Public Hearing 5. #1718 Davis Pansier, 4180 Bayside Road - Variance - Public Hearing #1719 Henry Brantingham, 3185 Sixth Avenue North - Variances - Public Hearing #1720 City of Orono • Pox Street - Conditional Use Permit/ Variance - Public Hearing #1722 Howard Eisinger, 3245 Wayzata Blvd. - Renewal Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing '1- #1723 Patricia & William Dickey, 2645 Watertown Road - Conditional Use Permits/Variances - Public Hearing m Rlaiixiijig Commission Cbsments ~ 10. Report by Planning Commission Representative to Council Meeting of March 9, 1992. (Chairman Charles Kelley) Status Report by Lake Use Committee Representatives. k- r ~-i f iitiiitiiyiliTii I PC Agenda March 16r 1992 Page 2 1.;, ■■ ■ ■>. ->■•- -:m f ^n • :;v i \' /, r' •:.v,:--^i^'tif;-.;v?^ •» :.f £: - M Status Report by Facilities Committee Representatives. Other Issues. 12. 13. ADDITIONAL ITEMS ■tW>C MlmXmmm 14. Planning Commission Approval of Minutes of the February 18, 1992 Meeting. HWi' ' ' ^ ' II5. Planning Commission to Select a Representative to Attend April 13, 1992 Council Meeting X ' y , . !; •: r m WiM ; ■"' Jt 'Vi P!-S * •'. ^ * • mm: ' ..■■>• ', ■''''•.■■••••• V' ■. "y"''-■'■■*' V"'' ‘, ■’ '* mii- >=:- TKr:^ ? :v ;‘)«1 ' ■'■ ') ■ Py--*'P;y - ,. . ‘ i; tr P *• i ‘ i, • i • r-' ,j f v .v - iilS; V- • .r a mmsm. ilfcf ‘■: ^ ■ ■'-‘-'■A.-C V : ^y; ..:-y:.y y- K -t* • ly ’N- ■Psie|y®y: .f t;' wmt lytM'yy:; m iiS^y yi^iH^yy '. -A-' V ■« -y-■1.'- yyyy-:V'*4fe.'.,;yy :. ■»|y .'/■ iii mm Mwir^>- .. , .'!Vj Iiitoiny;i^Hyy--;y i»A:.y.J -5 1 '‘w:' Planning Commission ^ ..'x u;j Council l«fi V ■ '•■=■ >■'!■ ■:• ' • 'i: U. ..•■• T'.''i ■ \ '. .».*•.♦ ‘ , PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO V,. MEETING DATE s//!,h ^^LEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. ' aK". NAME (please print)■■V ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1. 2 . /-—X hTKh /(yJL L^j i'lin •/-» •>> -> id■ 2.pfi^h/^Rfl C^rF..LK % C^;)rf- 5.I Vi 6. mffUtn 7. ^i:>iL£ %ihC.lAk>>9 i'bfk.fy-Hn ,\ 1,11-.ten C ’ M (C'v> \g l^i«»SC4T* ^ \M mm Froms I M:- ■|r>;., ■ — ^ . ■ - •m-r- - ^ « ^ ►•• iAW-', ,- ■' ^ - A ' * ’-^‘ ■' ’ •. Nk*. Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorser City Administrator / wm Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator March 10, 1992 Subjects #1716 Clifford L. and Timothy W. Otten, 3740/3800 ^ V? West Wayzata Blvd. - Preliminary Subdivision - Public %. MP Hearing Parcel A: :■:>; . • , ■ I- Existing Proposed Parcel B: Required Proposed RR-•IB, total area 8 801,068 s.f 71,617 s.f.or 1.64 acres 65,340 s.f.or 1.05 acres 87,120 s.f.or 2 acres 97,059 s- f .or 2.23 acres pateel C - 698,669 s.f. or 16.04 acres , Pertinent Ordinance Chapter 11 - Applicant proposes a formal plat including a lot ^ :i rearrangement between proposed Parcels A and B and the creation ^??Wof two residential lots. Parcels B and C. Section 10.28 - RR-IB Rural Residential Standards. ® List of Bxhlbits - A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owner's List D - 1-2 Resolution of County Board and Certification E - Quit Claim Deed of Vacated Right-of-Way P - Heckman Memo 2/26/92 G - Cook Report 3/6/92 H - Mn/DOT Letter 3/9/90 I - Hennepin/DOT Letter 2/27/90 J - Former Two Lot Plat K - Septic Inventory Map Parcel A L - Current Septic Testing Parcel B M - Former Septic Test Site Parcel B N - Staff Sketch Proposed Division Lines O - Staff Sketch of Proposed Septic P - Prelimirary Plan la«?■ ,;r ' V?.: ' * ■ _ V.'i' .^■4, tel." / -v- ■. V y^: v ' V- .; ^ \y.s -\. •. ' ■■;■. : Vv . .. V. :• I- 1 l . : •■■XV ‘ .• ■ *■ . ■r. ■, ■ ^ . -.r. ' 1 - • .■- '■'■i ■ - ’ ■ 'yyKm^ m W^^rryA-^rK-'-i-.WM \i:y;■ 't ,' •MMDK.nn mm • .V !• ■ HA i'Jpw ■■■ f ' •■ J . 4. ‘••t: ■-■ -i" • , ''*■ V‘. •" 'A 'mm ^ ^ - .if> .-4., .. ► . .' m: Zoning File #1716 March 10f 1992 Page 2 Description of Request *--,i •■. The applicant proposes a lot line rearrangement between Parcels A and B. Parcel A is the site of a former market, a nonconforming commercial use of residential zoned property for many years. The retail use has been discontinued for over a year and must revert back to a legal residential use. Parcel B, the residentially developed site, is to be divided off of the original 18 acre parcel owned by Cliif Otten. Review Exhibit J, in 1990 the 18 acre parcel was the subject of a two lot subdivision approved by the City in April of 1990 but preliminary approval expired in April of 1991. Review Exhibits D and E, title difficulties arose when it was discovered that the vacated old county road had not been formally approved by resolution of the County Board. Since the 1990 plat application. Cliff Otten and his brother have purchased the former market site and now include the property with the current application as part of the lot line rearrangement. Review Cosments of Current Subdivision ■T' . ■C: Lot Configuration - i 'mmmsmmmmim Parcels B and C obviously meet the required rural standards of the RR-IB zone. Parcel A has been reduced in area from 1.64 to 1.5. Please review Exhibit O, note area of the former roadbed. It is an area unsuitable for septic use or expansion. The vacated roadbed may qualify for additional ig^area but not as dry buildable needed for septic use. In addition the existing improvements on Parcel B also limit the opportunity of the City to increase the lot size of Parcel A. Parcel A shall be discussed in more detail under the septic review. Parcel B shall be recognized as a through lot. All future accessory structures shall require conditional use permits. ' -■ ’ ■S' <*-• It is staff ’s understanding that the purpose for the lot line rearrangement is to relocate the driveway exiting off County Road 6 within the new lot lines of Parcel B. Refer to staff's sketch Exhibit N. After your site inspection, it will be apparent that many of the existing improvements tied to the residence on Parcel B will be intersected by the proposed division line (look along the line of the power poles that defines the existing division line). The area to be added to Parcel A is useless for septic needs. Parcel A must retain the dry land area to the northeast (adjacent to former roadbed) for future septic expansion. Staff recommends a division line as shown on Exhibit N, Parcel B retains the access drive from County Road 6. 5:'V, ■ ■ ■ '■ iVi-v ■r-mm 1 A *^T.« l.*- Zoning File #1716 March lOr 1992 Page 3 ^ Access and Road Dedication ^ m-im wm ■M.' - ■ _ 'i '* f X I ^ mm m As in the original 1390 two lot subdivision, the City will grant only 7' of additional right-of-way for County Road 6. Review Exhibit I. Hennepin/DOT asked for an additional 17'. The City will hold County Road 6 at the 80' maximum right- of-way width which is consistent with all previous reviews. Note MN/Dot, Exhibit H, does not seek additional right-of- way but asks that all new future accesses to the properties be via County Road 6 (further subdivision of Parcel C). Cook in his report. Exhibit G, asks that all paved parking improvements located within the right-of-way on Parcel A be removed as a condition of subdivision approval. Septic - X y. 'V?I Please review Weckman's memo, Exhibit F. Weckman has not accepted the alternate septic test site provided for Parcel ^ B. Review Exhibit L, the site is located within a low wet y^etention area unsuitable for septic development. Review ^Exhibits M and O. It was first thought by staff that the former septic test site for an alternate system of the two lot plat could still be used by applicant but upon a site inspection it was discovered that trucks that serve the adjacent nursery had driven over the test site making the area unsuitable for future septic expansion. Note area selected by staff as suitable for septic testing, if kept to the immediate southeast of Parcel B, will have a negligible impact on existing nursery stock on Parcel C. The adjustment of the lot line between Parcels B and C must allow for adequate area for both alternate septic test site and a 20' setback from the proposed lot line. The City must ask for septic testing for Parcel A. Please refer to Exhibit O. Note the only available area for septic expansion on the limited site. In addition, Weckman asks that the trees growing on existing mound system on Parcel A be removed. Great care must be given in the removal of these trees because mound system could be severely damaged requiring expensive repair. All septic evaluators have been advised of the new septic code amendment. Testing for all principal and alternate sites must now provide testing for a five bedroom residence. Alternate sites for Parcels A and B must provide for five bedroom septic system. I t'. 'i-' 1;^. ' V i f ^ ■ .'ii ,<*»•*• - A ■''h': --■v"’- ..•i . •• •> V •VI i I 1 1 if*^ ,• • t «i»r Zoning Pile #1716 March 10r 1992 Page 4 :v:iv K ill .' ■•, • •:’A' - is Park Commission Rev The applican'ts and their consultant have been advised of the need for additional septic testing. As of this writing the septic testing has not provided to the City but it is hoped that Mr. Weckman will be able to provide either written or oral comments concerning septic testing for alternate sites on Parcels A and B by your meeting. ■■■* ■: *:k . m Staff Reconniendation The Park Commission conceptually reviewed the Otten proposal at their March 2nd meeting. The Park Commission is to determine if a park dedication fee will be sought for current proposed Parcel C# or wait for a future more Intense development. In the original two lot proposal^ Parcel B with the residence was not charged a park dedication fee. Based on the area of Parcel C a $100.00 fee was charged against Parcel C. The Park Commission will make a final determination at their April meeting. If it is determined that Pared C is to be charged a park fee now, the fee will be based on the value of 8% of the total land at an undeveloped state. The City Assessor shall make the determination after preliminary approval of the Council. If the City is in receipt of additional septic testing by the meeting nighty staff would recommend approval of the preliminary subdivision consisting of a lot line rearrangement and the creation of two rural residential lots finding all required standards of the RR”1B and septic code have been met. Based on the location of a former roadbed and existing improvements on the immediate adjacent property, the City has not required that proposed Parcel A meet the required 2 acre requirement but is satisfied that additional septic testing has confirmed that there is adequate septic area on the property for septic expansion. This approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. rJfylr; t Subdivision is classified as a plat. All parcels created shall be designated as lots with block designations. Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated 10' along all perimeter property lines and 5' along the shared lot lines of the proposed three lots. Based on the final division line between Parcels A and B drainage and utility easements must include the power lines that are located within the vacated right-of-way. Dedication of 7' of additional right-of-way for County Road 6. !;S V; •I ' ^ mm rj 7/ ’ t" • /t7 n ■-L* t ‘(\»^-V% i'. % •J: V d <' ■: ■AS ing Plli #1716 ch 10, 1992 ‘ e 5 iV •-.• '' • • < •'» ‘‘•- .t ’ • ^ 1 k.;■■. '.."''il »‘IF«r. ■'* r 1 iAn (HBL- 5. k- p ■■fell®' t'-. Park fee for proposed Parcel C shall be resolved by Park Commission at their April meeting prior to scheduling preliminary subdivision application before the City Council. Mi.. 6.If Parcel C is to be developed in the future, all access to the site shall be via County Road 6, mmm'.. 1 ^ 7 •Trees shall be removed from existing mound system on Parcel A prior to final plat approval. Applicant's contractor shall work with on-site septic manager to assure safe removal. Mi"'m Prior to final plat approval all existing paved areas within right-of-way of County Road 6 and State Aid Hwy. 12 shall be removed on proposed Parcel A, 9. other recommendations of Planning Commission..Jmai ■jj'' T ' --u >* j Ml m mm»mm -• V - S.*'4 ■ r JS &.1/? -, -.' r-mmWs^ m p ffj- _■ 'ti'- - • . 7 n»' . l?’ '■'' - -r ■m V- . -wm ■m / '' ' m -d'-: . i ’ tiVTtW ■ :■■. :■■ ■ :■ t-Tsi-M;. •••4'ms^ i®i|ipiSi : , : m Sil %Ar kk&M -■ *- • M«S»m.k^mI ■ca-a '- ii r.m. ' •rK ,v- I'.CITY OF OROHO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION 7r-s!fUf u'‘ --• SS'dd U/jt^ PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address J7¥C ^ -_ _;- --- - - Property Identification Kumber (P.I.D.) ^^^ Please check one ~ Property /^^^bstract torrens? V ^ ^ OOC^ Attach legal description to application Jc** VV'V APPLICANT Name Phone (home) -------------------------------- -> ^'0\ GEH 300.00 i , u> €.&.^n 300.00 :Phone (work) ^7-^ WcHih-fim YOU ji /V’. yivf__________ City:/^r^fr A^e.M.fc_____________________________________------------- Phone (home)_____ f<oiTWzip: -S3 3 JO _ 02/04/ ONNER (if different than applicant) Name ^ ^Ayyn/- m- // Address: __ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _,(attach list it more tnan one) City: Phone (work) '—_ _ _^Zip; EXISTING LAND USB Number of Tax Parcels 3 • WL Development Size v» ■;:V Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land > we' Present Use (check) Present Zoning District cm OF DFOh'O Fim^^CE OFFICE 1350200000 01 0Eh> Acres Total, all P«celsJ||,^^.^.^ Residential? no. of units Other (specify) —(LJsir PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) ’^y|jj|k _ _ _ Subdivision for New Building Sites 2. Existing Units ,2* Number of Building Sites: U/.'A’jr New Units Total Units oAf f 3^i Proposed Gross Density:/J/L Minimum Lot Size: Units per Jo Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) ^ *- ■ ‘ 'V-.V ■Saisi ■ "Y * ' ymiiiwi ■'•X- MmXMDM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Completed Application Form 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 4. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date FEES _ . y. Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) $200.00 300.00 300.00 Preliminary Review (Class III & all non-residential) 325.00 + 25.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 175.00 Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application 150.00 100.00 The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees ^tahJ^ished by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature Date ^/j/9 ^ / Date Applicant must have al"!" submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning of this change prior to the meeting. »■ six' . . ..a ■. • mm N •< > m o s o 99 Q T3S ^ 2 om u 99 Z O o ;3 'mmMdm i \M 0> IS>in ^ -n 70 90m m o a £€h HZ > <m §§ r- r* 5 S) O \M CDro in tM 0» l/> M M IV I M m m in in U4in c. c. CD Irv i/4 m H > > TV < rv m Z os i■ ->t -t•:; :.r.•• V \ V?- ,*. .«rar L't"Z W O r- O W S O Z M O CDT> o o in o r* o z r* iMm > m 09 w Z z ^ IV X > o ;k o 0)2 -< 3 m o I» IV m vM inin ro Z 93 „ o ;V;V; • 'a:?. ^ ?.■•• =--i- •_•; ••■ w; ■ O Wmm-^mmd r- in •« Q CD z 2 rv HiS5 in o z >Hn X f- C' z > H O ^ X r* m > > in3 < m 2 m 3c •n o Z in m » O IV in U4 09 s g inm \Min Ch cz c*>n M 7c -5 c* \*4 ro I M >-* CD Irv> w fV IV >r* oo o IV gm sS <n HX X CD o m \M 2 X OJ 09 D* »• in U4 CD <m ininwin P4 vO I'-555 ^S525rS 3iS = ‘" M Z > ^ Z X w5 z m ? o - ®So X O o o H \^n -‘7- 4 m- W H Z >> X X X m > \ -<> m o Z o z 94 m Z Z z O X aaz m IV Q 5S 2 5o o z m cn •< M 03 o Q ^Z C M r- Z 3 a -i 2 m z z in z in M v>t o «/4 O M m o M Z in X M O U4 iM 09 CD oo rv n D I Ms s -< > I fV U4 iX 4> OZ ooo NO 5SX o r- o m n X o > X X -H m m ^2 = o n X X o M > z »-i o 5§ X;«: > o z oX 3^ rv in in in nO m r- z r- m M in 3 m2 * > m X X > O VM iN 09 O'o rv I M <n V-- »-4 C9 X » -H ro X i^ O M in -i > ^ < fvmo S o o <n i W in O' in ik C X Z > (7^ -4 X X m m > X in Mm o iMin O'in KM 09 ilSe H Mrn m •<in ♦H 2 H M m < X X IV n O I M l-« CD Irv \M mm I > -D* zSo KM l-T rifw^ JF^- "■% ^. A H O X 3 > S> X 2 o 2 X m X m > z \ -< ^ >> m 2 Oo w > o O X 31z m i X X m m <r> nin o m SSKiSS > <m 3 ^ X NO r- KM in ^ <rn z O X X \ > > z rv >D M o o n *n r > <rr o w o (D o 09 rv sO I M > M o O I Z t V m u4 tn in KM i£55r- 4> in _ X z X >-< 2 n in m U1 H 4^ O 2 M > X X z m O z X 2 m z in -4 -4 *< > o nDa>o V4 09 in M .V n T I M > X m <n 09 Irv i^ 2 o ^ o in o in -s4 M o am X -i X Q rrl Z > M < SM m o 2 O o n rv o m a § rv rv O' in n n 2 > M ozo -1 r- f- N> m in X 2 in r- w < in a O' O KM KM a> *T» X' -»i o ro O so z I O M 5 S - KM H > W Xr* o §s X oH X X o U4 C C o X z z o r* r~ VN M M X IV EE f ■H -4 Mssss 5§SK IPsrn m c z z o o o X I /6T# C? CH- X >-4 o X i o o 04 o 5m IV V vO o 1 m X M C? i I i-\L-i •'f V -W^%r; 0048 2V T? D RESOLUnCN NO. 91-4-304 '1:t U .9icarjrrjha tr - .1-.* • —> Ifr-'-.y . / '•?•JJL fi' ■ry The following resolution was offered the Public Services Committee; BE XT RESOLVED, That the Coun^ of Hennepin abandon ri^t of way for Old County Road 6 (Sixth Avenue North) in the City of Orono, described as follows: All that part of the County Road as shown in Minnetonka Garden Acres, which lies viesterly of the easterly line of said plat and northeasterly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 83 feet northeasterly of the southwesterly line of said plat and southerly of the southerly line of County State Aid Highway No. 6 as shown in Hennepin County Highway Plat No. 5. BE IT njRTHER RESOLVED, That the Chairman of the Board be authorized to sign said Oiit Claim Deeds to the underlying fee owners on behalf of Hennepin County. The question was on the adoption of the resolution and there were ..Seven TEhS and No NM(S, as follows: COUNIY OF HENNEPIN BOARD or OCXJNTY COMMISSIONERS YEA NAY* " McLaughlin ; JQ^^f e TadiJ!^ • « Denis, Chairman »,V . ■ ^• . . V. « , • 1 i^QWjbN ADOPTED. ATTEST Clefk^f the County BoaiBoard ■% IBiaW'y rmm U'. , ^ •• f V ■ ‘ R 0 9 I99J nffil‘iiinir-ri''dy5 State of Minnesota, »-‘i ^.. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN. -'9^- CLERK OF THE BOARD I, KAY MITCHELL. Clerk of the Board of the above County, do hereby certify that I have compared the papers writing, to which this certificate is attached, with the original J.®?.9.I.4.U9.fl...N9.;,..9lT.4r.M4..adpptg(^...l>x.ihfi..tt9.nnsw.n...CAunJy...to^ ^ Iv .0iJL.ApriX..9.,..199I.................................................................................................. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... as the same appears of record and on file in the Said Clerk of the Board's office, at the Government Centerin • • • * said Hennepin Count>, Minnesota, and find the same to be true and correct copy thereof. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF. I have hereunto set my hand and afHxed the seal of said County, at the City of Minneapolis, this .. ....... April A n 91 Wt^:i-m day of ..... .vr... I..................A.D. 19 .. .t........ KAY MITCHELL V I- •■V:v': vmm * v; Clerk of the Board I I (1 \ C Deputy ^ yj • J *7.*‘ V Li'f wmm "ii '.v;^ , ■--♦I*'-'‘ V'; -.'V #171 K'.,. W''Me HC 29(3/89)iP :./;V •■'ri ^'4, , ■ ■I 1 Xy/:'- between. Whis Hlnb^nttttt* Made thU------------ ien.-^.thfi..CaMn.tyjafJienne^^ 15th Apri 1 and corpora 91 .»•»««•«•«• •■•••••*««»*^ mA *»«*a»*«»*>*f7fl 3JL Cr «»••«« . ?'i dfJtdk^pejftMUn xmdsr the lawe of Hie State o/..~..llln.n.f.sp.$J. X.Uf.ford.J.^ttetL- ., party of the first part, and of the County of ....HfiflIliB{lilL part..^.^......ef the eeeand part, Hftd Stats Minn0sotsi .-.V-'J u'i;' 9BHtatMttl)» That the said party of the first part, in consideration of the sum of .................................................................................... toUin hand paid by the said partly.____.of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby aokncno^ted, does hereby Grant, Sar^cdn, Qaitbiaim, and Convey unto Hhe said part.y..........of the second .... heirs and assigns. Forever, all the tract....^ or parcel—land lying and being in the County of ilfinnepita...................................and state of Minnesota, described as follows, to-wit: All that part of the County Road lying southerly of the centerline of said County Road as shown in Minnetonka Garden Acres, according to the duly recorded plat thereof, which lies westerly of the easterly line of said plat, northeasterly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 83 feet northeasterly of the southwesterly line of said plat and southerly of the southerly line of County State Aid Highway No. 6 as shown in Hennepin County Highway Plat No. 5, according to the duly recorded plat thereof. < «0 «* to »0l4 «fit %>ame. Tat,tlur wUh all th, h,r«utament, and appurlmanoM thm- nywlse appertaining, to the said part..^------of the second part,....jh.lS._. ver. #1 a;;:4 -41 .'■:<■ r 31n tc^monp IBhettOf, The said first party has eaxised these Resents to be execuM in iU corporate name by i/#....Chai.nn.an__ ^KWM^J5C5^ ...............................••-•a»**a,aaaa„,.CLTtCL lt$ CGTj)Gl^Cit^ $S(Xlf be hereunto affixed the day and year first above written. In Frewnee of nnfipiR. / h/irtnan of the County Board .........................F^^amu „ _ . ^23MJjC^.Clerk oi7 the County Board I ts...... M.... I. j^taeasm 1:.: ■Tr-ti* j..,. ^>;v. r', z TO: ^M.. FROM Jaanne A. Masbusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE: i Stephen Weckmanr On-Site Systems Manager m February 26, 1992 IP SUBJECT: 'Subdivision #1716, Otten Brothers - Septic Beview I have reviewed the existing and proposed septic system information for this property and would make the following comments: ei'ci PARCEL A I# The existing system is a mound complete with new tanks andSsH V. -.r. “4:,5-JiVKvr.;3 must be removed to help prevent future problems. Soil testing must be performed to identify a site for this parcel. Please note that the lot line ^arrangement adds acreage in Parcel A just south drainfield site, however, this area will not be suitable for a drainfield site as it was formerly a roadbed. PARCEL B Ik k The existing system consists of two tanks and 900 s.f. of drainfield. Se have n^reLrd of any problems with this system since it was upgraded in 1982. :;:a jr.".'.*. ‘.'s.u clav soils to 48". Percolation testing indicates surrounding area will likely^ collect. - sii-e required to identify a more suitable alternate drainfield s SDMMARY Based on the above information, I would recommend j5® proposed subdivision until additional soil ;:Sbu ■ JSk. s&: ch 5W. ■iMak 1 f:-. • \ >.W - •' Jl • ’ \ jlrm. <j' t* ’ ■>. -V';' • . • V ' *1 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects Otto G Bonestfoo. P6. Joseph C. AnOcfik. PE. Marvin L Sorvaia. PE. Picna/d E Turner. PE Gem R Cocm. PE Thomas E. Noyei PE toben G- Schwnicht. PE. Susan M Ebernn. C PA. Keith A Gordon. PE Richard W Foster. PE Jerry A BouiOon. PE Mart A Hanson. PE Oavio O LosKota. P£ Robert C. Russelt A lA K >vard A Santord. PE D^naXJ C Burgafdt. PE T.d K. Fietd, PE. Mcnaei T Rautmann. PE. Robert R PfWiene. PE James R MaOno, PE Rene C PlumarL AIA l^mneih P Anderson, PE Agrscs M. «r>g. AlCP Thomas W PetefsorfPE. ' MWs8 Jensen. P£^ Mart R. Roifl PE. Thomas E Angus. PE Oamei J. EcJgerton. PE Mart A Se«o. PE. Phiiip i Caswel PE. Ismaei Mamncz. PE Mart O PE. Thomas R. Anderson, AJA Leo M. PaMvefsKy Gary F. Rylander. PE. Hartan M Olson Jerry Q Pertzsch. PE. Cec«0 Cih'^er. PE Gary w MoT'en. PE. Karen L W«merf. PE KcKh R Ytw PE. Mchael P Rau. PE. Charles A Ehctton Michael C. lyrtch, PjE. March 6, 1992 L Phillip Gavel ffl. RE. ‘ ■ ■' ' .i MAR .8 1£S2 m City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 a Attn; Jeanne Mabusth Re: Otten Subdivision Our File No. 139-1716 Dear Jeanne: ilwpf a . ' r.: -.r We have reviewed the Preliminary Subdivision on the Otten property at TH 12 and v^uunijr Road 6. H K ' 5 r- ■; ’■•■•H-r'.'Drainage and utility easements should be provided along all lot lines. The City should require removal of the parking lot area on parcel "A" that is on county right of way. The future right of way requirements for Highway 12 are undetermined and camiot be considered at this time. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK Sc ASSOCIATES, INC. - VV7 > Glenn R. Cook GRC:dh •-^1 v-3 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota SSI 13 • 612-636-4600 ■*JI * •> • ‘'. ./*i ; ;^*i* . . ■; '■•'fe'- ■ . OPTt^ IliiiMtota DtparttiMirt of Transportation % - Metropolitan District mg Transportation Building ^ St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Mini^ota Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, ‘ March 9, 1990 w'--" Reply to Telephone No. t 693-8405 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth >1- Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P. O. Box 66 I Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Municipal OlKices M ■ ■■ ^.1 J ,.••••;; : . ‘Af,i f- ‘ In Reply Refer To; 315 it?"' C.S. 2713 (TH 12) Orono NE Quadrant TH 12 & CSAH 6 Section 29 & 32, Twp 118N, Range 23 W Proposed Lot Subdivision e Dear Jeanne: T,- 'r •’If.,'0. ■ ;vi*oSfa.:f^. ■A 1 ’ aiL^Z« J -t We cure in receipt of the above referenced plat for our review in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and Surveys. We find the plat acceptable for further development with consideration of the following comments : -v1mmmm This is a high accident area, one of the worst in our district. We would prefer that any new access to this property be off CSAH 6. W9P Current drainage patterns and rate of runoff should be maintained. The development plat should be reviewed by Minnehaha Creek Watershed .ft;:-;* iicms ‘ Sincerely, TH 12 upgrade in this area is uncertain at this point and a decision as to location change is minimum 2-3 years from now. i ^ -i - V : A. If you have any questions in regard to this review, please contact Rick Dalton at 593-8523. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.X’ '•vf-.' • /, ■ mm ■A •■ \m ■'v . ^ VI' m.'' r-; . • • •' •. . .T. Povich Assistant District Engineer i-r '. ■.? Steve Keefe - Metro Council Kenneth Felger - Hennepin Co. Surveyor Les Weigelt - Hennepin Co. V' '-v'M,-: ■m ymm y.-- ‘I.V I ■ • . Vi: • • • r.* . ■ > V • .% ■ ■■ ft- . t > r V-,1^: MINNESOTA * " Va>« ^ *^ An Equal Opportunity Employer mik. mmm"mm ^r^'^c- <r\ - ■'V H-i7. V • Bi4TVV*^* ;:%■?« HENNEPIN DEPARTMENfr OF PUBUC WORKS Engineering Division 320 Washington Ave. South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 Phone:(612)935-3381 February 27, 1990 mm A/.'. > Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Dear Ms. Mabusth: RE: Proposed Subdivision - Rodney Johnson CSAH 6, North side, approximately 750 feet east of TH 12 Section 29/32, Township 118, Range 23 Hennepin County No. 1811 Review and Recommendations .1 We reviewed the above subdivision and make the following comments: r :• - For future Improvements to CSAH 6 the developer should dedicate an additional 17 feet of right of way along CSAH 6 making the right of way 50 feet from the center of CSAH 6. - Any access from this parcel to CSAH 6 will require an approved Hennepin County entrance permit before beginning any construction. Contact our Operations Division for entrance permit forms.to m - All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved utility permit prior to beginning construction. This Includes, but Is not limited to, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. Contact our Operations Division for utility permit forms. - The developer must restore all areas disturbed during construction within County Ms ■mkM 1^ right of way Please direct any response or questions to Les Weigelt. Sincerely, ^ ^ Dennis L. Hansen, P.E. Transportation Planning Engineer 8mmmmm LH/L0W:lw hm ■:r ■ wmmmM i '-Jv i».-VV;3!:-'2 T- • "V . HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer h-m ' >-■ T>fv #1495 mt-iK : -r :-’',Si*** j;m ^ r V .<»• niutVi'Vi. V ;•■ v^'-V':^;-’' jii' •■ ' ■ ii; '.• , ^Vv ‘ '. ■ '• ' * * L* ' ‘" ' ' • ' 'm. • . vy V -%;■ ■■ .►l,-. r f...'.;•V^V^ If yr U • > '..Mill ;r« '""r.‘Vi*K #> r *1' -*r* ft .AJ --•ji ,\-i r- ♦?.* -•" u::.«\ •.. -• k*;'•n>v t:_, — w i ■'-*!//, _v,/-r >^T fit io-1 ■»l£r ‘_£i_l:iUt!^''L.. ,V />* i<f€ 7/fH 'i7'f7; ^ H r/-#. nV / r. »i v'v V ■* // .1-ft: y V f/' s V 'M v'-.'«l s. r\./: 7-- {)V t/ r• • • •• • • • • ^ •* mI .‘*4 t: w-is \ X v-'^ ■ .>*-A*if; *>v: \ - ' ■ •- x^ st9W3rw ■; — /7/ t,o 1 - X ., V# • >.-. .• • » I f»‘ • • • •*• a. V..,...‘U;,.. ..•• I x.>, V. • -H. ;• i ^ 4 ; * * V* ? * • “ *v l» r '•, • ‘:r" • . . C • ‘- .r ' • ; •• • - /v ; t 4 7y Va’-* "l ’*'1 ^ 4 •'? ’ K *, ‘»., . ‘(r • • V. ' r >jfe> ■ .•, “ * v- *'^ ' -• y::".-'''-r -.[^' w .V • ''t'y ■„ r v/Afr. h’*' f*Il ?*”***?• V* ft»» tMftftifti n«t '# U4 Wi»iiftr ■•. •, ria« I. « •». It f»4 tMtf an* Ills. r««« ftiv. K«a t« la* llttl «• HafMft* tlva* u*a u%«. Ml iifM •%« uiii «f>»mt !• Mftwra ftrir^. ■• II \ \ n-! 'x \ V* mBkM f mt umm M If ^1 NN >S: <T^5SJ?' :x «• Ilk* I * v; ,,., .vI. ,-1 v;.r4^ ; ^ •. ».A^‘ *- r*,. V- • *-»^. r-’=^ '.: ' 1 •v'^rX-C •*'f*-' •-^* !i:'*?*i•. J ^ “■ * ■ • ^ *•• <”' ^ ■ •*■" •**. • . ** *'*^ *^*. , »• m/ ^ •*.**#-! • . • . J**‘ , ' ' H j: ! * i r :,-. • /* • ',* ‘ *' • • ■• • • . . *v ■•• •• * •* . * • *••• '•....*’ •. ■ v'. • r' -'-r i•.->..^%;-;. .v; •• •• *.m di«^t ’.. rjl-' \... > ;* -♦• • • a s t----------| IlHff-- --•••• • -• • ' V*. •/ ’ • A ■*'••• V-..; ^ '■.• '• • •••:.•■- '— - •*■'■- -. ’. . •'••-J. T» .***'t ‘^^ ^ •* •• » .-^ r /n^-v- • * . -':r *.— • •: *v«*- ^ -‘•’i ., ^ ’• *.r -s' ■'•. vC • -V • • •u- •••*. ‘ *V ■• .L- *^ . ; ‘ ' * . ‘ «*' .•«...« »• • •• ^.. _ V * • - ^ "."*. / -• .. • * .1* • • K •« • .*. • *•■ *• •.•*. Vf.« • .- -I............................* J’ * • '•*• * ' • •** * • .. • . ..^. . ^i.*.-. . ‘ • */ - -? r*. .. .^ • * • • ». V*. *••. ^ ; .• »« ••* •*■■ • _. - ■t .^ ■*■’■■ iiwiL . . '..■ *» * ' ■•» *> ■•■*'. • •* * C * •■ I, * ,*' * * ■ »-*'\ ■•■•# .* ''■■■* *v • ! 't'V ^7T T T";..r -.YT V^'^rr-t^ «i. • L f ' : : • .’ * • * • * ; • t t 1 i-..L.A l i »« 1•r 1 1 :i 1‘ • J—.•i 'r —•*• - • # • »^ • • • • •■». • . • *1^ 1 Ji ^... f Ik.. .-.Mt \ ::JriL ■ v*'*' •• ’' ■ Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator ■■V. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator March 12, 1992 Subject t #1721 Albert Hanser, 1685 Fox Street - Preliminary Subdivision -Public Hearing Zoning Districts RR-IB, Rural residentialr 2 acre minimum Total Area * 29.14 acres 15.76 acres wet i; — ,. . 13.38 acres dry ■ Applicant proposes a rural subdivision of 5 residential m •i Hi- lots. All lots meet or exceed required 2 acre minimum area. Pertinent Ordinances ’: Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) - RR-IB, Rural residential lot standard. Rural residential standards require that lot widths be measured to the rear of the street/front setback line. Lot 4 does not meet the required 200' width. Per Shoreland Regulations, Page 28, Section 4 (Exhibit P), lakeshore lots do not have to meet the required width to the rear of the front setback line. All five lots are classified as lakeshore lots. Chapter 11, Subdivision Regulations. i Shoreland Regulatic’.iS - Amendment, Exhibit P.* New shoreland regulations classify the property as lakeshore or shoreland properties on a Recreational Development lake. Based on new regulations, the required lot width is measured in a straight line at the shoreline and at the 100' structural setback. Lot 1 does not meet the required 200' width measured in a straight line at the shoreline. Refer again to Section 4 of Shoreland Amendment. Please save this copy for the temporary inclusion in your Zoning Code. Recreationrl Development Lake Structural Setback = 100' Septic Setback ** 75' Setback from Wetland, Browns Bay Structural Setback » 26' Septic Setback * 75' yj ■it ■m Wi - l.l.-lli t '!. .• ■* Zoning File #1721 March 12, 1992 Page 2 List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D-1-4 - Hardcover Fact Sheets iiifef;1 •T. E - F “ G ■* H - V — J - K - L - M - N - O - P - Q - Hardcover Map Weckman Memo 3/12/92 Cook Report 3/6/92 Section - Culvert Under Dakota Rail Gronberg Report 3/9/92 Baffle Weir Design DNR - Protected Waters Map Watershed Map (Tanager Lake/Browns Bay) Road Profile Road Section Road Plan (Urban Section) Shoreland Regulations/Shoreland Overlay Map Preliminary Plan ;Brie£ Description of Application The applicant proposes the division of his 29.14 acre homestead property into 5 lakeshore residential lots. All lots shall be served by a private road. Each proposed new residence lot will be served by an on-site septic and well. Based on the new shoreland regulations, the existing guest house does not meet required 100' setback from the 929.4 or OHWL (Ordinary High Water Level) of Tanager Lake and is considered a non-conforming structure. Additional septic testing has been submitted for the guest house. Upon a site inspection of the property and additional information from caretaker, it appears the existing septic system is located to the south side of the guest house and may encroach the required 75' setback from the OHW of Tanager Lake. Applicant has option to either confirm existing location of system or install a new system within 1 year of final plat approval (per Section 12.30, Subdivision 5 (C). If applicant plans to install a new system, additional septic testing must be provided for another alternate septic site. If feasible, guest house may be served by existing system that serves principal structure. Applicant must decide how this matter is to be resolved. Each lot meets the required 2-acre dry contiguous standard. The southern wetlands are part of the Tanager Lake watershed and are now classified as part of Tanager Lake based on the location of 929.4. Refer to your preliminary plan. Exhibit g. The watlands to the north and east are part of the Browns Bay watershed. All setbacks shall be measured from the agreed upon OHWL of the wetland (932.3). The wetland within Lot 1 located between the driveways cn Lot 1 is not a designated wetland nor is the low retention area .mwji Zoning Pile #1721 March 12, 1992 Page 3 t'ri '.-■■■.■ JtiVv . within Lots 2 and 3. Both wetland areas have been impacted by the recent high waters of the Browns Bay wetland. This condition will be discussed in more detail further on in the memo. In your earlier sketch plan review, it was decided that future access to the undeveloped western properties is not practical based on the expansive wetlands to the south and west, steep topographies to the west and impact on dense wooded areas. Review of 5-Lot Subdivision Lot Configuration The structural setback from the Tanager Bay side along the south is 100* for all existing and proposed structures and has been met except for the guest house on Lot 1, located approximately 75* from the shoreline. The septic system appears to be located approximately 65-75* where a 75* setback is required from the OHWL. Both are non-conforming and must be recorded as such in the final subdivision resolution. All other existing accessory structures on Lot 1 r ^et the required setbacks from proposed lot lines. Lot 1 is now classified as a lakeshore lot, accessory structures can be placed within the street yard. It should be noted that the tennis court is also non-conforming because of the substandard setback from the wetland area. Even though the wetland is not designated as a protected wetland, the City will ask that the area be designated as a wetland at the 932.3 elevation. Lot 1 does not meet the required lot width measured in a straight line the points at which the side lot lines intersect the C,' - i ofer to Exhibit P, Page 28). Line can be adjusted to satisfy code requirement. Please review Exhibits D and E. The applicant*s consultant has confirmed that there is no excessive hardcover within the setback zones on Lot 1. Note guest house structure does not conflict with hardcover standard. All lots meet the required dry contiguous area requirement of the RR-IB zone. As already noted during the sketch plan review, proposed Lot 2*s building envelope is severly restricted although the lot meets all standards of shoreland and the RR-IB zoning district. Development of this building site will have a major aesthetic/view impact on Lot 1. fcl ■ ■■rmimsm ■ VX., -xX -- rx'v--. 4.V.. r •. - f. Vfr. ^yA :« Zoning Pile #1721 March 12, 1992 Page 4 Septic m Please review Exhibit F. Weckman confirms that all septic systems meet the required setback from Tanager Lake (100' structure, 75* septic) and Browns Bay wetland (26* structure and 75' septic). Septic systems all test out for mound design. The 20' setback from proposed lot lines can be met by each of the sites. The City will require that the septic areas on Lots 3, 4 and 5 be staked prior to any lot grading or road construction activities. It shall be necessary to provide permanent staking and fencing for the septic areas on Lots 2 and 5. The private drives to each of the proposed residence sites will travel close to the septic areas. Because there is no other suitable area for septic sites on these lots, it will be necessary to protect the proposed test sites. . ^ _ The City will also ask that a swale be installed along the shared lot lines of 3 and 4 takes drainage to Tanager Lake. The swale will drain low seasonal retention area very close to the septic test site on Lot 3. r’. Gradinq/Drainaqe/Wetland •13, ^ V ■ All wetland areas shall be designated as drainage easements on the plat; Tanager Lake at 929.4, Browns Day wetland at 932.3, wetland to the north of Lot 1 ac the 932.3 and wetlands within Lots 2 and 3 at the 933.3. Drainage easement shall be taken over drainageway that extends from low retention area to Browns Bay wetland under proposed private roadbed. It is this wetland that shall retain the majority of run-off from developed lots and road hardcover. m ■ "■» ' ■■ -4! U‘ In early discussions with Ron Quanbeck of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, based on the hydraulic information and elevations taken on March 9th (since Cook report of 3/6/92), we have concurred that the 932.3 elevation is acceptable as the OHWL for the Browns Bay wetland. Review Exhibit H, the culvert under the railroad track, the outlet at the south side was found to be at 926.95. The invert at the north side was not detected but it is assumed there is no more than a foot of difference at approximately 927.94. The culvert is lower than the elevation of Lake Minnetonka at a 929.4 OHWL. Browns Bay wetland is directly Influenced by the lake level of Lake Minnetonka. Quanbeck says that the Lake level right now is at 930 and that the OHWL of the wetland would be approximated at 1' above tne lake level of Lake Minnetonka so the 932.3 is a very generous calling on the part of the applicant's engineer. It should also be noted that the original 933.8 elevation of the tracks of the railroad would not be the control elevation because the surveyor has also located a ditch that drains along the north side of the railroad to the west (Tanager Lake) at the 933 elevation. The Public Works Department has partially • I m kni. i '•m •■r .U ¥ ■' . vw-’^.sv -•■)■- .. »^'- Zoning Pile #1721 March 13» 1992 Page 5 m unplugged the culvert under the railroad track. Applicant's surveyor has' already recorded the effects on the Browns Bay wetland. (Review Exhibit H, on 3-9-92, surveyor confirmed 932.1 on north side of track, 930.8 at south side of track.) Access/Road The City shall ask for a 33' dedication of right-of-way for Pox Street. The private road shall be designated as an outlet Review Exhibits M, N and 0. Private road construction will not 1 reguire a separate conditional use permit or variance as the road will not encroach the wetlands shown on both sides of the roadway at the 932.3 elevation. The road is shown as an urban section with a 28' width measured from the Inside of the curb. The road has been laid out to take advantage of the gentler slopes and has attempted to minimize the removal of several mature trees. A 5' boulevard is shown on either side. It is the policy of the City to require all lots to be served by one single curb cut via a private road. Staff would add that there is adequate sight distance at both private road and driveway at west. It is staff's understanding that the applicant will seek special consideration and ask that the western drive be allowed to remain. Applicant's representative should be asked to conjuent on this as City has received nothing in writing requesting the use of the most western access. As no wetland area is proposed to be encroached by the construction of the private road, the DNR nor the MCWD will require special permitting. The MCWD review of this subdivision will deal solely with surface water management issues as a result of this development. -v‘.” Issues for Consideration It would appear the only variance sought by the applicant is the required 200' of lot width at the shoreline. Lot 2 with adequate lot width can be adjusted to provide the additional width for Lot 1. Planning Commission should include this as a condition of subdivision approval. mm I Applicant must also provide direction on issue of guest house. If septic cannot be located and the existing system defined, applicant has one year to either connect to existing principal system (if adequate to sustain additional use)^or ii^stall ^ewrir . . . . . . . • -I.-system and pro^de additional testing for alternate septic system. Applicant may decide to discontinue use of structure as guest house and proceed with required removal of inside plumbing. Should applicant be asked to file a separate Conditional Dse Permit for guest house that has existed on propoerty for 40+ years as the City required in recent application of another resident? '.‘(i 1 1 i i ,U«rJ ; '• ■3 m f. t ^ Zoning File #1721 March 13r 1992 Page 6 r/,. V i.'r' Park Dedication ..dd The Park Commission conceptualy reviewed this subdivision at their March 2, meeting and recommended a fee on lieu of lands. City Assessor will determine value of undeveloped land for jjark fee determination upon Council's preliminary approval of subdivision. mendatlon of Approval The preliminary subidivision application of Albert Hanser Involving the property located at 1685 Fox Street has been found to meet all pertenant standards of the RR-IB zoning district, shore land regulations, subdivision regulations and on~site septic code. Your approval recommendation should contain the following conditions: 1:^Applicant to grant a flowage and conservation easement over all designated wetlands within the plat. Wetland and retention areas are to be shown as drainage easements on the plat. v-'.V ’X- •■'i -.-.i, Access via private road. Planning Commission must make recommendation concerning the continued use of Lot 1 of the most western access drive. 3. Applicant to dedicate 33' of right-of-way for Fox Street Drainage and utility easements 10' around the perimeter of all lots and 5' each side of internal lot lines. Easements may be omitted at lakeshore and edge of wetlands. Maintenance covenants shall be created for purposes of maintenance and upkeep of private road. In addition applicant shall be asked to grant road and utility easements over private road. Park fee shall be determined by City Assessor upon preliminary approval of the subdivision by the City Council. Septic areas on Lots 3, 4 and 5 shall be staked prior to required land alterations. The septic system on Lots 2 and 5 shall be permanently staked and fenced in order to protect sites from future development of building sites with residential and driveway construction. rmm 4 »T^' ?.'. ^rr >s<.t fimmm Zoning File #1721 March 13, 1992 Page 7Ji.. '.A mmm «■' r.‘ f 9. '»' % Applicant shall install a swale between Lots 3 and 4 to drain low retention area adjacent to septic sites. h.mm If; ^ •r-' ■•.: P-fi The City formally recognizes the guest house and septic system on Lot 1 as non-conforming based on new shore land regulations that classify southern wetlands as Lake Minnetonka. m i®i Based on resolve of guest house, shall applicant be asked to fill Conditional Use permit? In addition the tennis court is also recognized as a non —conforming structure because of the substandard setback from the adjacent wetland . Shared lot line between Lots 1 and 2 to be realigned so that 201' width can be met by Lot 1. Applicant to provide permanent boundary markers along lot lines of elongated shore land lots so that future owners easily know the boundaries of their property and prevent future mishaps by either building sites or septic sites being destroyed on adjacent properties. In regard to issue of riparian access and rights, the City's position is set forth in Section 10.56, Subdivision 20 (Exhibit P, page 26) which states as follows: I ’ ; ,•W mm I. • < C: Riparian Access and Rights. For properties which as a result of the designation of the OHWL are found to abut the boundary of a lake, steam, or tributary, no section of this Code shall be constucted as obligating the City of Orono to approve variances to provisions of the Code prohibiting physical improvements, structures or land alteration within protected wetlands, flood plain areas or shorelands. Nothing in the Code shall be considered as establishing or increasing riparian rights. This section of the Code is intended to regulate land use and establish building and zoning restrictions only. i i 4 V ''mm:■ ■ ■ d-'!: ; ^ "V'^" 'i'V- - ^ ’ , .' V-■/.mumJfe-:--yVy-';.r '■ r- ;--V V.-■; ^ '.(1 ■'' ■ ■ mM:• -■r': ''' ' 'rg ■j •a' J'; < • V>r* y »*-. 'iW ■ kti-1 ■■■ N ITY OF OROTO - SDBDIVISIOH boferty location rrvtl ^2 -//7J -i/ •’0<ha) Identification NunU^er (P.I.D.) £i-//7-^-^-^£^4 torrens?lease^^iheck one - Property JX_ abstract or attach legal description to application.________________ Phone (home)__ IPFLICANT _ __ Phone (work)Name - " ------- y^»r. City: (^Jr7.AT4 ^ Zip: Address: tll--_ _ _---- - - - - - - - - (if different than applicant) Phone (home) r. Phone (work) Name -______J4/3i£-------------------------------—" ^tattach list ii more than oneT City:Zip: ZISTZB6 LAND USB Number of Tax Parcels Development Size?%/3 V ^ Acres Dry Land « 7 Acres Wet Land ■/V; 7- Acres Total, all parcels ^ Present Use (check)Y^r- Residential; no. of units Other (specify) — W jj*- ’ ^ Present Zoning District ROPOSU Division for Tax Purposes k Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) V subdivision for New Building Sites Number'of Buildi.ng nites:/Existing Units New Units -VI . •*’■7 I , .• • • Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Total Units Units per /J.*f Acres AO* Jc4fS Sq Feet Dry Bulldable Land pjjoposed Use: (check) __Residential “ Other (specify) liiM mNIMCIM MATERIAL NBCBSSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMlNARy APPLICATION !• Completed Appllca,tion"Fozm 2« . Preliminary Plat information" on Certificate of Survey. 3« Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center * 348-3271).* 4. • As an addendum to this applicationr please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. vi Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete• Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date 1. Payment of fees (park feesr filing fee^ sewer and water assessments). 3* Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 4. Eas^ents, Covenantsr etc. 5« Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ Date fSBS Sketch Pl2m Review (Class I, II & III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement. « .Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) •• ^ Preliminary Review (class III & all non-residential) $200.00 300.00 300.00 325.00 + 25.00/Lot Final Plat Review (class III) ^ *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) . • Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application 175.00 - • . • . *150.00 100.00 The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and foj^her agrees to pay all additional fees establisheu by ordinaiice. l^pplicant's Signature Date >imer's Sign^^ure . V. * ■ Date • • ^licant mt&st have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the ^Jannlng Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the :hird Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled »««tlngs of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an m^orlz^ agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning irzice of this change prior to the meeting.•VM ^ .‘A TJf.: ■ r '.c-i-' ^ ■ •■ -V ■» -V \ m ’ *. f ■ • •• ♦ • • , >* ; «* . % - .- . . • •-** # “• * ' • ■ • -•".*• • •- . : ' ^.C• • I. . ; ' • . • I • ‘ • J I ••i t * ■■‘■r -j :■ •. :. •%; ;• :/v-r . - •.•• .. • ,-. . • • ••• • ■<•-• ;vV .' V * ‘d s 2 • • ' - ■ S S ■ ~ • z > S S ' ^ 2 * §- 1 V. 1111 .: ■. - ;•■ 1111 ' 11 1« .. I • ! “• ^ ■| . 9D -<m s •§o7^ iso 99 O O 99 •5? •f*. * ■ f.* . V . . 5 ; 0^ - v«* ^ » •• •• .2i35SgSS 'i’QgSSg 5sc5i»•r .5^iio® • cPoSmg ^ . CoSSS rn m m m SUI > > O M >5 ow o ^ S S ® o « M O O o ^ p ^ m M 9 2 M 9^^ o > 171 > > M .* •< l>» H H IJI -1 H %• ;:? ft fi *5 M ?s.vv, - • •'_ b*^<> ^ m 9 iSpilao rn m m 0 tt u ».- |s|;s • |s||g X vj 2 :x pog J^: ^!iiiJ x=>i V:. ! i3*%*5<«9S|5J 91 99 90 M M • *• ••. ooo in S > I- . ac fO (/> IM ^ W V4 c i .. 8 n % 19 Oo IM SU4 H (AMS'!*. ’ - wr* • • j •» >* • r^r *^ I ‘ #• *'..i~ 1' • I ' §11 > *■' r- uf M 9 M '. I .» • X M 9 0 e M > > > M 09 < 0> f- f- ^ 2'"55So H “n w>goo ^ g )-' > > o w _ I- M 09 -< ►•* *n X ^ 2®f8SSoJWOg N ai-SwSZ m M 2 X N 5 w > > o w L e p- r- o 09 ^ o 07 X po m m ui X X X o 3 M -i H ro 8 o o M n X X 5 5 B* X M •Vv-"'^' ,. !*•-■ ■ ■/ . - ■. *f“ «W>L‘ XX m w4 171 m M V..'' r-------- V’Tr '• •!y:' ' .. • M Vn O MM MO r- Z M so X r- rn M X o X > o o > X X Mss ° 171 m > > o I o rn m m i/> rv9 X X X l/> M 5 o X o X M M C®*zSo 33**? 7 *Sg.8V C. X M •'W ^171 > M - " »- gs > Z oo >-V.';,.' V ip ^ ■ ■ ■: i ■•' ' . r*-;", .«« * • •*. 5!dJfiSSS’ •i. ^ 4^ > > ^ U1 O X 2 X n r> o M X O X X M 01 8 2 M Mxiss 5S??§S oo o M ^ O P P p ^ ^ ^ • XX n>M M P M SlLS'8 ® R R f!» X M M M O m m M X X P o X M H H *8»=.C n X X o p m » > a I Ui ^ Z Z X rv> £SSSSS ssis •1 . 0 fSI 1 M 3 2 2 ni M Z P m M ra X X X M M •- -y ^9 n$ ril p P P oo M oo I gg H X X 8 mm M gPM « , M M < ♦ ! § ;.' *• • t.*. ^ # • i*-. ^ •• r i ■ - V * . r •* - **• '- - * • ... :» • g s I •* 4. ' ^ ./ V - mi • - " .X - . • . >*- ^.gi •* ••• -A.y: -,• «*-•« : .» - I • ... . - ^ • •. .T' , . -i. • ., •# * .. . , ^ MM i'*• » * • * .* • -. ^ -• v'*'T /V.' — •.-5 • ■* •- • -•> • - ,’ , V. • V' — . : ..•* • r . ' ■• -7 -* % fc« * • *-# *•» % • ^4»' J . •»* . »» ’■•*?**^ ,♦*- ” * ■ '• ^ * '# » • ' i* ^ 'W.; * ' ifor ‘ ; U^jrij . ^ti..-.. . ■ -Mrlgfca. _____^W;.-. _______ .el-.- ... - - -^ ’ ...; ■ V:;' fc*;, •••■• . -• ; JU . .• . *• . •«» - *♦ *••••. .m^ ■ * *• t . •- .V 4 ^ V •>* • ■•• m ^ ^ -• ^ • X vI'-F-e-’"' fc '^0 . ^■ ’- vismW. *'>• • ^ *^V r, .> -V.- **." A .■ :-v n 0-' . i HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET 3-?'-<fz SETBACK ZONE! (CIRCLE ONE) C0-75J/> 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone %. * A. ■ H ouse S.F. LENGTH WIDTH • « • • S.F. S.F. f |6^7'v * X .S.F. •ari; • •- •• • S.F. *•• • », • B, Garage S.F. ; i;, c. D riveway •/vt J i S.F.if»--::,r:>, i-A.-LK .■..'-■vJi s.Fs^HK; D.. Sidewalk ‘ * . .'■:" • :,d - ■ y ‘' S^'i y' •'■«p- HARDCOVER CALCUUTION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) CO-TH? 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' E xisting Hardcover in Zone A. ■ HoUPE S.F. LENGTH WIDTH m S.F. r S.F. X .S.F. m f • S.F, # *»• • •. B. Garage _ S.F. . o' l'«p Driveway S.F, - '-y-D.. Sidewalk * S.F. S. P t S.F. ^ATIO/ Deck S.F. 4 s _S.F. F.Landscape AREAS underl<un BY ■ , PLASTIC" SHEETING S.F. r-Sr<f^f^ S.F. ^ » • m .■ y rr.x S.F. mmmmm ■i ••S.F. G. Other S.F. ^ - Total Hardcover in Zone S.F. To'fAL P roperty Area ik Zone f S.F. B •f Ib 2<e. __ X 100 - Q>xo t .. =: ;T-V:. . i: .. -■ k-. : ■m: /.or 'W SET3ACK zone : (CIRCLE-ONE) 0-75'<7?2^ 250-500' 500-1000' # Existing Hardcover in Zone A, ■ House % • LENGTH • • ♦ • ^ • , .............. jARAGE _____ « •* tr* • W:,:m . Driyev /ay D.. S idewalk 'X # F.Landscape areas underlain BY ■ , . PLASTIC------------ SHEETING t» '•* « 4» • . X s. Other . X \ » = S3SO WIDTH z?,z Jog •• X . Total Hardcover in Zone I Tqtpl Property Area ih Zone S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. s<r 3 00 X 100 - * 72. _ S.Pr S^.SOO t S.F. JJ.SS % • * « • •• .»*••• w.. »«. #••• F«WF • » • m ^ --^K-r' ^ • ■•HARDCOVER CALCUUTIOH WORKSHEET __ _ _ SETBACK ZONE! (CIRCLE- ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' (?00-logo^ t Existing Hardcover in Zone •• * •# L A. ■ House ^ • • X ■LENGTH WIDTH ;•■ '• -. Tr..; ; ;V - • ■; • • • • -M . X >V Garage Z^€ Drivev /ay /Opo D.. Sidewalk ' E. Patio / Deck F. Landscape .If' AREAS UNDERLAIN BY ■ , PLASTIC------------- SHEETING •• «• - 4 • • -• f« S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F, S,F.Ar ‘I u:A \m- > >•■ S.F. ■''‘■fflssg S.F, S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F. S,F. •Ijlif'' ■ S.F ^■i S.F.|i^ S.F.mi . S.F.mm S.F. .■'J'AA- • ■i :;■■:■■■:■ K: Total Hardcover in Zone OTAL Property Area in Zone 4 ,. . . . . . . UiksL... jiu iik^A-.w: EXHIBIT P •y,~ ■'"■""aiHH^T ' '■ Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager mm-DATE:March 12, 1992 SUBJECT: #1721 Albert D. Hanser - Subdivision - Septic Review Soil testing has been completed and a report submitted to the City for review. A five lot subdivision is proposed, including one existing residence and four new building sites. I would make the following comments: Lot 1 • > -* ■ Both the main residence and guest house have existing septic systems which appear to be functioning adequately. Slope at the tested sites 0-4%. Percolation rates avu -^ge 8.1 mpi at 16' depth. Depth to seasonal satuiition (mottling) is 2.3-2.5'. Due to shallow seasonal saturation, both sites require mound drainfields. Topographic location and site drainage is adequate. All setbacks meet Code. m-m .r.v. •■■j Lot 3 Slope at the tested sites 0-4%, Percolation rates average 8.8 mpi at 16" depth. Depth to season saturation (mottling) is 2.5-2.8'. Due vr> shallow seasonal saturation, both sites required mound drainfields. Topographic location and site drainage is adequate. All setbacks meet Code. Slope at the tested sites averages 3-9%. Percolation rates average 10.6 mpi and 2.3 mpi at 16" dep'^h for the primary and alternate drainfield sites respectively. Depth to seasonal saturation (mottling) is 1.7' in the primary site, but not observed in the alternate sil,e. Both sites are acceptable mound sites, however the alternate site may allow a standard trench upon further testing. Topography and drainage is adequate. All setbacks meet Code. .V,. tm ?""' ' ‘%- Meino March 12, 1992 Page 2 :¥■ Lot 4 'yrTW^^.•. -X' ■ '‘t Slope at the tested sites averages 0-6%. Percolation rates average 18.7 mpi at 16", Depth to seasonal saturation (mottling) is 1.5-1.8'. Due to shallow seasonal saturation, both sites require mound drainfields. Topographic location and site drainage is adequate. All setbacks meet Code. ir.-m .3.1 Slope at the tested sites averages 0-7%, Percolation rates average 12.9 mpi at 16" depth. Depth to seasonal saturation (mottling) is 1.8-2.3'. Topographic location and site drainage is adequate. All setbacks meet Code if wetland level is 932.3 (the culvert under the railroad may become plugged resulting in a g933 elevation based on ditch outlet that drains to Tanager ake wetlands along north side of railroad track). •; .i.; Summary Soil testing indicates that all five lots have acceptable primary and alternate drainfield sites. The existing septic systems on Lot 1 appear to be functioning adequately at this time and alternate sites are available for each, however the guest house system must be located to determine conformity. Also, all lot lines and drainfield sites [^aiust be clearly marked at the time of final plat approval. ■i e' PW' W ■M f dliTlM I I ' * i •d • ‘^ r piiiWii: rs-ioc. d > * »■ ' . ‘>5*- IP m wwmm .JiiA.* ^Cj Jl^^ Bonestroo mm Rosene Anderllk & Associates Engineers & Architects Octo G BoiwoDa P£ Joseph C Anoet«L PE Mjfwi L SorvaU. P£. tUch^ E Turner. P£ Glenn R Cooir, PE. Thomas £ Noyei PE. Rooert G Schuncht PE Susan M aertia CPA Keth A Gofdoa P£ Richard W. Poster. PE. Jerry A Bourdon. PE. Mark A Hanson PE. Oaihd O Loshoca. PE. Roden C Russek. AJA A SanM. PE Donald C BurgardL PE Rfd 1C Field. PE. James R Maiarkl PE. Kervieth P Anderson PE. Mark R Roil. P£ Thomas E. Angus PE Oan«l J. Edgenon PE. Mark A. Se<L PE PhAp j Casvwei. PE Ismael M.artna. PE Rene C. Pk^mart A t A Agnes M. Rng. AiC P. Jcry O Pertrsch. PE. Ceoko OBner. P£. Gary W Monen PE Karen L Piemen PE Keen R Yaop PE. Mchaei P Rau. PE. Charles A EncksonMark O. VkMki PE Mchaei T Raucmarw. PE. Thomas R. Anderson AI A. Leo M PjM«isfcy Roden R. Pfe flene . PE. Gary F Ryiander. PE. Hanan M Oson Thomas W Peterson PE. Miles B Jensen PE. L. PhAp Gnwel ■. PE J Michael C lynch. PE "*■ March 6, 1992 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 ■■w'" mar ^ 4I ».* • r Attn: Jeanne Mabusth V>', * Re: Abert Hanser Property Our File No. 139-1721 Dear Jeanne: tim 'm. ■IT-?';;' ■ A We have reviewed the proposed subdivision for the Abert Hanser property. The existing . water elevation north of the tracks is currently at 932.5 due to a culvert that is partially mi 7j ■ -----------------------------------------------------___ ^ _ :? plugged under the Dakota Railroad line. The water elevation is most likely controlled by the low track elevation of 933.8 rather than the partially plugged culvert. iii There appears to be two choices for determining the dry buildable land on the property. The first would be to accept things as they are and consider the normal water elevation to be 933.8. The second would be to try and control the normal water elevation at some lower elevation that most likely existed at one time. This option would require replacement of the culvert under the Dakota Railroad and possibly some ditching between Lake Minnetonka and the Railroad. m i im e will need to meet and review this issue further with John because the ultimate decisicn effects Fox Street. ■‘W Please contact this office if you have any questions. E. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC /, Glenn R. Cook GRC:dh . i.-'2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 I m •ss" l-li-^T—Jef=<=l-t^ o -f <Df20/O<3 ■¥• •• *5 z-un- 23 ■ H f. ,v~T, ir; - fV d %; • ■■■-■■ ■'> / m'K.r : i - ■ • . toUeV -^3^ 'ST^ PIP*^" -; -'I ■■ *■ ,—— U^rHrt . tsTJ 0 fJ^T c,^ et&^ > 3-S Vs^SxJ^ ^A.US^ 4..30 ■ lA J> .2«»6 ei^eV ;'i ^ \C\ 04 cc»c^gT2,T 1$ jTo^*<2A^r //z»aJ s yUi \4 l- ^41^30 - ujy^r&rz fJ , ^i PS ~~ ^ (e* 1 H - ^Sl/Z. M-»A-TH7t» S' Sf P^ ^ *^35.S P/Pe MVf^T^ l" T4(diC », rt *1 'H r 11? "5oo^ 9mm iU^>f ,4v r . •.•.j' • \ . •‘■•■■■vI wm ■•■ > riiJ'. ■ ,y ■"■' iKii ■Ljv --. - •■.!£&, ;:: ••;ii V. *>! .■;5ivlyyy ‘S; ;: *y ^ ■ jv ->■ .■';, ■, :;:V• '.,:i^m •.^ . -? ViV;.->1 I’"' ?.U »?• .:,•»• . . ?:-•; i V • V ■A . * V ^ w ^ *• ' mmm Lyy ' vApfl IPPy- y mmmisy- P" y . .•■ *■ V ‘wmKm ■. •'"•y'v 'V : .. '.V iiiMt^ Yi I [i ; -yi' yi-yiy'Tw-y''j 3-f •■ ■ :,!/ ' ^ ’ " Hm ' mm >■ 1/ -TiJfy.' >*u■': rr T9^a: COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. SUnVBViMO. BNOtNOnNO AMO LAND PtANNiNO 4«a-A TAMAMACK AVBMU* LONO LAiCe. MINN. OMM* 473-4141 ■£Av-;.4i-'•-. ■, City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Jeanne Mabusth 3-9-92 '• RE: AL HANSER SUBDIVISik iWB ¥i-•K f'Dear Jeanne: m-Mmm f-xi 4 U- J :i‘ t • , vr-' JKc'v ' '■km Last fall when the water level was quite high, we shot elev ations on the easterly Hanser wetlands and found that the water level was at 932.3. On February 21, 1992 when the culvert under m.iik the railroad tracks was being unplugged, the water level had S|:; ."liJ risen to 932.5 while the wetlands to the south of the tracksI xi. y fcr wa.s at 931.2. Today, the wetlands to the south has drained down to 930.8 while the Hanser wetlands is at 932.1. Thus, with the culvert currently working, the water level in the Hanser wet lands has dropped 0.4 feet and will continue to drop. The overflow, which could be lowered, is in the north ditch of the railroad tracks at 933.0 at which point water would flow west to the Tanager Lake wetlands. As shown on the enclosed road plan, even using the high 932.3 elevation (the 100 year Lake Mtka. flood plain elev. is at 931.5) allows more than enough room to construct a roadway along the present driveway and still meet the setback requirements. If you have any other questions, p‘ m; • iu MMIctt “.V li-’ ?•• v .A a w- s c luiKlsisiS MkA y M ' "'■'it- J pi p?r>4. '■• ■ i-si i p':®; 'A--::- ■k-m : . :»'.v ^■■■■ ' ■■ :r}t^ r - a; .rt'S-,'V ' ....4 , ' a VV,:;X;X;:.X'ywm. -y- 'O,.' a X A v.y^-^r m 1cr:ry^m ■ - - V - ^W^M i ■• ''Z 7 ' '4^ mmm 1'^ s ’®* ■■*i:v ' hW Kiv': i:'■■■'/ i s ■’- ■ it(~; -••r-v. ., y.<?7 flV-iii«l ■5:1^ 9j . V •• '. .3 ^ .'"- V^MBktVi.:;', -. '"i ?jvn^. >W. >3 — • • 1 CJ% m /yy>f^- r®: aT. ■ -S 'ii' X>mm ■l.. .:■■ iC•;4f^Jd^M^<i^3l'r.• •: .u* . y- y ^ - '^ k‘ /'v1 ■:'t •' . .y ^ “ / •« . nki>7^ 7wH A ,i .1 • V ;■ tne ------- — .^M.ww ujiwjf .tliU U'V/5 C ,S‘3t2 a* Minnesota. -----a *A * m. r. V . . * •‘a . • IJ * ‘ % BT « U-. r- v: •■ • ' :i %V • . , • •. f • • I* f 1 • I*: -r r. j<f ^ *. < . * jf-‘. ■'‘;V- «■ ^ # • - >>-1 -? ■ «^sb^ r ' • ^ N *** " > • • V * V . ‘'V •• •• '.^*. • . r *t-V • j* ' •*'• r ;.. .-I- : V I •‘•‘I i S . •'ii . ;J;.C •../. I - . > .A I m •i ( \ »« . '-• I * d • \ t • ♦ r » • . ^ «* Uv. < • - V :.'’•- *• •^1 £’«r; V ^ ' * •. .. >*• ‘ V J-'y-r • * ^ .' V* *■'. ■ • ■ ’ '"i v:z 4- i ; . . • ;.c* .. . A :^-;v - ,’ -.: if-.V '.' • •* ••• ’ .’ • ir.jtP --^'.V*'’>^^^1 * o*'fj 4* . . V ;• # ^ ' ''♦f *j 1«, V, •• . V r- J. . V •» - ^ - Sii-SiL : V ■ »*. • r.‘-* ** i?.*4 ^ •• i- ■■ : -■'■.r^f^ «1 JL i'■• (• ^ *C • ■ 3 ••#••••••«••■•*••••«•*••••••■ •••*•>•*• ,m ••• • 2*** • »«•••• •|#*4«V->«**I*** a«««>4*«*a>»»«***<a2««4*>«««42'****'***I<****a***ra***a*****«*** •»•«•••«••••«•«*•■•••••«••••«••••«*«* ••(••••••(aaJSaa'I** ********•••••••••••••••••■•••*•••■••••••••••*• «■»•*•• *>f* • ••••*•••*•«•••••••*•••«••«•« ■4««««t>***<>>4*«*44*Ka4»J •••>•*•■* • ••••••••?••♦*•*•••••»••»•*••?••»•••••§•»•*»*«♦». • a. •• •*•••« **•«• ••••••■••2***>«ta<a!**4«a>**«,«4«*«<««>2...•••»•, 4>J*a*«>Z<*4 ****4***4044*«4»4a«^at««*«4«4^*«»«4««t«^««4a44444 *• a«t ••*•*♦#••• •***4***»a««****a»<«**4*<4«*«4*4«a*««4*4«>a»4«441 ^ aCafa* ••* **** *«aa******aa***a*a«*k>**a»»4aaa«ataaasaaaa«a**aaaVAaaaaa»*a**a4 • •**a«*a**4«t4aa*af*a**»aaaaa*a«t4aaaaa*4aaak*a«aSraaaaaaa**a** • •aaaa*4a*aaaa«a»aa9aaaaaataa*.*aaa4aaa*^4iaaa*aa > . tX a*«****'* • •••••••*!aaaa*>*«*Sa*a.aaaaa2aa*»aaaa**aaaaaaa*» ■ ..m.aaaajaa* • •*aa*a*<faa*aaaata**aa*aataa,a«a*aa«a*,aa»*taaaa aaaaaa»*a*** •••****»***************aaa****aaa****a**i**************a*aaaaa**********a*a****aa*****aaa*****aa*****«***a**a»*«**4**aa***aaa«k******a*a**a**a**a******«a^aa*»***** • •a*.a«..aaaa*..a..,,,.• • • :.................................. a a •..............................................fTSI . / • •*••♦ ^•*99^9$99^%9§^m9%jf%Mm9^%*9*99 ^999 • alf 9 4t •••• » • • • •• •* • ••••••••• •••••••• 9 99 99 9%^ 9 99i% 9% 9^0 • *«*«••••••••#•••••••••••••••#•<••»»*•«•• 111 •••*«*• « I** * * * * A *• • • I « • • • • t « • W"t0% * • • • # «••#•••«•••••«««••♦«•*♦••»•«• k« III *^ • • • • » §«•••»# *9C t • * * • 999^999m%\999%%%9%9\^9999m. 9 9^^ |M| • • • f • •v» ■ V ♦5c "Sasieo ••••••♦444AA44A44444#* • • • •• • #••• •• •« • • • « • 9 * •■ \99999f99999999999999999999999099999999999*9999999990 oi cn UD HR w -c -t f-:;[%:.! i i •: a ~ , ■iJ.S' -' » ^*>4 j*"' » a '*1*1 .* '• ■' * ■'* P-v. ; ■ i Ur^ - V iS-P? i <mm•**4aa*a**«a**********aaaa****aak*«**«****aaa**aa»**a*aa*****«*as**aa****a**aa*aa*a*a : O ^ : •••••••AtSAttAA o i=* ^ N*; w o ?5 UJ f : ♦ Ci R : k i : ; Cl : ; f •i4*«««tAA4Att44t4*««4»A9«4««44<k* aala ^••••••••*************»*k***a***********»**«***********kakaaaaaaak*ka*a*a*a****aa*aaa***kka«***akaa**a««aaka***i I **9999%999m999999999999999999999i 9999999999999999999999999999m «*•••••*•#••••••••4«4444444A««*t«4A««Att#AA4«t4»4«4AttAtAttA*tAtA4«»44AA«A«»A»l /, I ^: *« i /.a: X r ; 1 J i ;; i ; : ; i : ; : s 1 »: i i i i ; i ! ! ; M I D WN *'t'*aaaak«al*a fi» ***J‘kaa*»ka,*.«! M!::•!!•!*••*!>-•€* *,• a«» kk*a. 2* »A • • ♦ a • a k . a k a a a !«<a/> ' '1 ' ■■•'a .;■ . aa-;^ , \V":J-V ■ : r %99999999i t99 9^99999999 999 9999* 999999 99^* 9900 i '• <r* r: • * :V*: [ • « « * • « '.Til I fla L .4, ♦ • •*^t***4A«4#^*t4*4tA4«A4A4#«A4AtAt«tt«tAAA4 •••*•«•••t #•#•* • ••»•««•••« - •#« •! ♦ •******9%m9^* ••• -• ^»A«»tA»t« 4 a*A»« « * 4 » t t A•t^ :h i.:.. ••: I ; i :::::: I I I i i :: i : i : i J i :: : *.^^‘^j^**'^^*********^|^*«^|p*^^j^^»'**^l^‘*]||^^ 1^ ^^«^**«****»**********»****#****k I k*W***#**a«*«**** a •••*•*#• *k|*a a •*••#•. .a.•«aaa*a« i I : i ’ i; * : ^ ::::: I 1 ;:::::::: I :::::: r : i I :: * •?•**♦*••! ****.aa.*.,a.a.a*.;..a................................................ ............ . a ...............................................‘.aa a.aa**..i **••*• •»*•*•♦*♦*••***■•• raaaaaaa'»*-*aXaa«*aaa*aa»»a****-*X*»» ;•**•*••••*».....................................................................l••aa.aaaa•.aaa*,a.aX,.. .aaaaaaaaaa aaaaSa .. *********J‘»»******fa* aaaa«»a**aa,,.,.,7,.:. ...................................................................................................................................................aaS-aa •♦•‘•‘••‘J*********** •**<** a*>*>aaaaaaiaaaaaaaaaf.ak>a.aaal.aa •******»*I*»»«aa-aa*aaa4a.*ak*aa aakaaaaJaa.aaaaa.*.aaa*aaaa*aaa .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5**‘‘'‘**‘t**'***’**8*********I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .a-aajaaa •♦•**‘*»** »‘*aa* aa*,,.,..».,;,,k. .. .a.a* ,,,.,,,.;.,,,a.a.alaa». ••••*********«*»*a*#aaa.aaaaaa»»a-**a*»I ‘aaa..aa...aaaaaaaaa*laa ••****«****«»*aa.aaikk.aa.aaa#.aa.a-a.a*aaaaaaaaa}.aaaaaaaaaaaa< *****■****»*• a •*aak*.a-aataaa*>. a. aaaaa*.aakaaaaa*aaaa*aa**iaaa ••***•'**;•••••••*»•. aaa»aaa.*.a..aaaa. a. #4, aaaa-aafaaa ::***!*l*5**‘*»-**«t*..........................................................a.J......................................................................5.aaaa.a.a2.»a...-ak*.a ‘••‘••‘••♦••*a»«««‘X-aa.a.aa.2a.aa,a.aa,aaaaaaaak5.a.aaiaaaJaa. ..........................................................t.................................................................................................... ....................................................................a,*,;......................................................................J.aaaaa.a S'»-___________ _ _ __ _ ^ ^ ^ ^ * 1 ■ ■-■ > V iS i •1 *******^**^****** A••t*44 AA4*AtttA««A4»AA4A4A«#AA«tAAA4«A«*A«tAt»AtAt««#tAt4tAAAt4444«A«< '4' ■•.• ' «■ K''S w>< ^ • “•V‘"t;.'*f SsSi* - . iMp • ■V: a ■-asa-^Sr':? ■ a: -ft-.. v.:,^ vv^.. .!, ;:.V,?rv4^ ft:,ft,'ftv*;j:;-^ pmmmmmm-': ''■■■ ■.■ X ■ • *•*•*/'• . J • ‘ • • * ■.•.*.■•»*..♦ :.*’^ .* • .•• •• ‘fa- ,:/* :i.- p ■:••--!/ ftv ft ft'-' "lY«:,i;; , m ■# ■‘ii :.^r yv:;.;-f;v.y/'y ‘;Vftft:;•■■>/■ ftftf >,JM *1 ftftp" • fta»ls® 'lis©ft: ft:: ■. mm Ms::::^v:.>:i^.>v:y-^•ft■^v;,;- ■; ft ;V..', V^<.'c4ft:, ;- ; _ 'ft ,,. ft ft-\-ftft--’r-vAft'#ft:ft : ■ ft' wmmmmiftE- ifewy' fti:;i»ft:ftfty.ft- !lSiS®fty,ft ftfft'ft -ft'ftft-ft ft'Mftft #:■ ft: vft V :ftft;::ft ft.-; ft:/ Jfifefv'ft '^■^' :ivm - ,,,4:^^ftft;.ft :• ftftftft..- ft .■.■'• ■•■. '•-A-- ;■•••': '' = mm ft -iii^ P^t.y>V;'-v' -'i . V ^:ftyi®::-ftfty'»:3 m. t>- gftS'ft :■««%} f: ft:--"”'ft ft'ft: ■: ft:; : :?T : : : t : : rr ; : : c ? i; 5 : : : ; : ri r I : P J': ? :i! :'-'.f ~? •■ :'J - ■ = • ’: i: :-: :T 4; ; : : : j iV;: i : ;, r ? : t V r: : :t :.:::: t • 4 ::: :i: ^JZT - • t;.>; : i:*; : ru..; ::;::: 4 • • 4 . ♦••>sl = • 14411 i i ? l p' i :pi||jlfiyymy »l ■■»***•;*^*« •i«*l»**«»*4V*^‘***l**VT**?^r**?**r^ - : • -4 , • :::::::: jx: o •< - : • - • : : 3« t : p :': : :;:::: :, : : :ro - i ^ ..................................................................... f« . * «i*» • • ♦ ^ • ^ ^ • ••• • ■• - *1• • . • • , «■<•. ,1(9 • ag^jk • • • • • • ••••••• • • •■•■I................8 i •;i^^ ’ r .............................. ^1* ,•••••,. •.•- ‘-vP* ».*• a, «••• a >•••••• •••*•*•»»••* I: i i : : : • ' • 'ft ;••****•• « 4 * • • 4 ■ -Tr^r ■i" ••: »••»»*«•••»•i**i*pi*.i*..j./*»«***i*** •••••••••••••• v*?*v-***’***r*v**“**^v**r**s*'.'**r*****r**?"“r*****r**v* ••**** ,a»*l»«***'«**S ‘-*******2^*’*** .♦» Jk i mm mm ORDINANCE NO. 101, SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OP SHORELANDS . 'Sf. The City Council of the City of Orono ordains as follows: The mi&icipal code of the City of Orono is amended by adding Ordinance Mo. lOlf Second Series; SECTION 10.56*^SHORELAND MANAGEMENT. A’-s.-: Section 1. Section 10.56 is hereby added to the Municipal Zoning Code as follows: Subd. i. statement of Purpose. The purpose of this fcof shorelands abutting public waters that exist within corporate boundaries. The City recognizes that the uncontrolled use and development of shorelands has a negative impact on not only the quality of surface waters, but on the economic, recreational, and natural environmental values of shorelands and the waters they 5U3fround. The specific intent of this section is to. A. Protect the water quality of Lake Minnetonka a^5^thei lakes within the City by allowing development of uses in the shoreland areas which are compatible with Orono's Comprehensive Land Use Management Plan. B. Provide appropriate standards for development which will minimize the impact of shoreland development on the ^water quality and the economic, aesthetic, and natural environmen values of Orono’s lakes. Subd. 2. Statutory Authorization. This shoreland ordinance is adopted pursuant to the authorization and policies Re^i\ations/parts"6120?2VoO-6\2o“3^^^ and the planning and zoning enabling legislation in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462. Subd. 3. Definitions. Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases used in this section shall be interpreted as defined elsewhere in this chapter. All other words or phrases shall be Interpreted so as to give them the same meaning as they have in common usage and so as to give this ordinance its mo reasonable application. For the purpose of this section, the words -must- and "shall" are mandatory and net distances, unless otherwise specified, shall be measure horizontally. 1. "Animal Peedlot- - A lot or building or fSSdi^g? bree^fng^^rLsT^^^ or^ho^d7ng anf^als^°a^id''specPca?ly designed as a confinement area in which manure may accumulate, or where the concentration of animals i? such that a vegetative cover cannot be maintained within the enclosure. For purpose of this iiffi m:. \ mm ■« mm 4‘^^t ■r%: ki'V- V.-;' . * » .■*• A. A' •K : . • ■ \ • / :% • • • V » *■ • *». ' Code, open lots used for the feeding and rearing of poultry (poultry ranges) shall be considered as animal feedlots. Pastures shall not be considered as animal feedlots when the area enclosed as pasture is equal to or greater than 1.0 acre per animal unit. % 2. "Bluff" - A topographic feature such as a hill, cliff, or embankment having the following characteristics (an area with an average slope of less than 18% over a distance of 50' or more shall not be considered part of the bluff): shoreland area; B Part or all of the feature is located in a The slope rises at least 25' above the Ordinary High Water Level of the water body C. The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25’ or more above the Ordinary High Water Level averages 30% or greater; and body The slope must drain toward the water f A't- fr "Toe of theoluf f" means the lower point of a 50' segment with an average slope exceeding 18%. "Top of the bluff" means the higher point of a 50* segment with an average slope exceeding 18%. 3. "Bluff Impact Zone within 20' from the top of a bluff. •iv Commercial Use A bluff and land located The principal use of the land and/or buildings for the sale, lease, rental or trade of products, goods, and services. ■ ■5. "Deck" - A horizontal, unenclosed platform with or without attached railings, seats, trellises, or other features, attached or functionally related to a principal use or site. 6. "Duplex, Triplex, Quad" ~ A dwelling structure on a single lot, having two, three, and four units, respectively, being attached by common walls and each unit equipped with separate sleeping, cooking, eating, living and sanitation facilities. ;# 7. "Dwelling Site, Transient" -* A designated location for temporary or transient residential use by one or more arsons using temporary or movable shelter, including camping and Irecreational vehicle sites. mM 9 8 Dwelling Site" - A designated location where a Iwelling tmit is intended to be constructed Uilding designed or 'Dwelling Unit" - A building or a portion of a intended to be occupied exclusively for esidential purposes', including provisions for sleeping, eating, ooking and sanitation for not more than one family, but" not .. --i •- 'i i • , f • • * •* »- . « . - .■ .* . • ■ \ . 1 * . ’/A .I ■'Cl ■ ?. rooms» '’ ■ # 10 "Extractive Use" - The use of land for surface Statutes Sections 93.44 - 93.51. * 11. "Forest Land conversion” - The clear outt^^^^ forested lands to establishment of a subsequent forest stand. in "Tnriii^-fc'^-ial Use" - The use of land or buildings for the •production, manufacture, J^arehousing^^^ trans er of goods, products, commodities, or otner wnox IV i' 13. "Intensive Vegetation ^row!’^or removal of trees or shrubs in a contiguous patch, s...ip, block. g. * 14. "Ordinary High Water ®^ ”^e’lVatio^ bo-,:ndary of p^lic ««\ers and w«t\ands^^ and maintained for a delineating ^ \eave evidence upon the landscape, sufficient period of . natural vecetation changes from commonly that point where . For predominantly aquatic ^ level ±s the elevation of the watercourses, the ordinary high wat • 3 ^^d flowages, the top of the bank of the channel. ^fe^^tion of the normal ordinary high water has determined by the summer pool. The designated OKWL has fo- certain water bodies Minnesota Department of as shown in Subdivision 7 of this section. 15. "Planned Unit Development “ nu^eJ of develooment characterized by a i^l^^^tes on a parcel, residential dwelling units ^ units®or^sites\®o VusL°^ TwTwes^o/PU^are ^provi^structure types and land uses. Two types for in the zoning code: ■* A. "Pianned Residential P?7eV°T"^nJ’lSding The nature of allow^ W ^ B. "Planned Unit Pe^‘^I-'=’P?®"f,J!°E’ Ij^till^ 12 corridor" - The nature of commercial, institutional, P“b“= “ is limi to in Orono's Comprehensive defined in said amendment, areas within the Highway 12 ns« housing types and ?he Highway 12 POD offers « the densities. Note: ^o properties ^ Highway 12 PUD are within the Shoreiana wveia.«xjr : -4-? •• • •• - ' . . ' • •' v- -' V r . ••■: ' • -• • • . * . .* . .• . ..*.* ^ . ‘ • . 4 • e * V *. • •* • • V . : V " i uS*wv- ! m •:■■■' •* * 'isedi' Vil:i V , m • 4 16, "Public Use" - The use of land by the general public or by a public agency on behalf of the general public, for any purpose. : -3 V e. 17. "Public Waters" - Any waters as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 105.37, Subdivisions 14 and 15.^ Oh 18'. "Semi-public Use" - The use of land by a private, nonprofit organization to provide a public service that is ordinarily open to some persons outside their regular constituency of the organization. I b 19. "Sensitive Resource Management" - The preservation and management of areas unsuitzible for development in their natural state due to constraints such as shallow soils over groundwater or bedrock, highly erosive or expansive soils, steep slopes, susceptibility to flooding, or occurence of flora or fauna in need of special protection. 20. "Sewage Treatment System" - Septic tanks and a soil absorption system or other type of on-site sewage treatment system as described in Section 12.30 of the municipal code. * 21. "Sewer System" - Pipelines or conduits, pumping stations and force main, and all other construction, devices, appliances, or appurtenances used for conducting sewage or industrial waste or other wastes to a point of ultimate disposal. 22. "Shore Impact Zone" - Land located between the Ordinary Eigh Water level of a public water and a line parallel to it at a setback of 50% of the structure setback. 23. "Shore Setback Zone" - Land located between the Ordinary High Water Level of a Public Water and a line parallel to it at the structure setback. 24. "Shoreland" - Land located within the following distances from public waters: 1,000' from the Ordinary High Water level of a laike, pond, or flowage; euid 300* from a river or stream, or the landward extent of a flood plain designated by ordinance on a river or stream, whichever is greater. Where topographic divides occur at lesser distances from the involved water, the limits of shoreland have been modified per the official map entitled Shoreland Overlay District on file at the C_ty offices. 25. "Significant Historic Site" — Any archaeological site, standing structure, or other property that meets the criteria for eligibility to the National Register of Historic Places or is listed in the State Register of Historic Sites, or is determined to be an unplatted cemetery that falls under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 307.08. A historic site meets these criteria if it is presently listed on either register or if it is determined to meet the qualifications for listing after review by the Minnesota State Archaeologist or the Director of the Minnesota •v • •• ‘f- • V.'* * * : L: ■&JL pi.-, :i A •• .r. r IN# m;VK • • ; . «: V -.. :v * . . • •- . • y ^. #■ ' * ‘ ' * • W yx:-! ^ i V» • ■* .>k $ • -tf Historical Society.' All unplatted cemeteries are automatically considered to be significant historic sites. - 5fl "Va-iance" - Variance shall mean the same as .... ..„ 1. i. 462. OA "Water-Oriented Accessory Structure or Facility" -.A do°oTS, ""and" r”e\aTnin^“^ reasonably needs to >=« of such structures and ?fcTliti2SYncluII boaShSu'Ses, "gazeb^os, screen houses, fish houses, pump houses, and detached decJcs- 25. "Wetland" - Shall have the same meaning as defined in Section 10.55 of the zoning code. Subd. 4. Jurisdiction, °„'ater%odle ”s*"n l5:Lsiflea /n subdivision 7 of this ordinance. subd. 5. compliance. The use |ny shoreland of Public waters; the size ®hape_ of^^lots^^ the^^^_^ location of structures 'systems, the grading and filling of any shoreland areas; \*1®, =\\^Yn^full comoliance with the terms t.he subdivision of land of this section and other applicable r g subd. 6. station * an^ "e"/f orfemeit“o"f ° this responsible "f"Vhe |ro"^^^<’“= for the administration ordinance or ordinance. *°y anv^ of'’its requirements (includingcomply with any of its connection^;riure to =°”Piy yih\any Of Its connection violations of conditions and saleg „ses) shall constitute a wito grants of variances or =°""V°“^defin^ by law. violations misdemeanor and shall be ^sa of whether or not a peraitn iS" W V«~... » 1. « •this section, -n ■ « 7fi -Steen Slope" - Lands having average slopes of 18% or greater^; m^^su^rel o"ver horizontal distances of 50 or more^ that are not bluffs, of business- tj u •I • ♦ fj •*.► ■'a j ’ f'. i *■ • e ' :"S -' > « y f •. . ■ ■ % . . o • • “ ' ■ •. I ••.vyf’t;', -f. •» . . . -^•* a..* • * . • * f. •• r - i i . . / Jfefi ifmiy#iT »■ * ‘^1 I # , . 4-f>Minnesota: A* Natural Environment (NE) Lakes Protected Waters :j» Lake Classen Dickey Lake French Lake North Basin: Sewage Lagoon: South Basin: ‘i^ Lydiard Lake Lake Katrina Wolsfeld Lake (Medina) >• V. B. % -v: Recreational Development (RD) Lakes Long Lake " Mooney Lake Tanager Lake Hadley Lake (Plymouth) •t - C.General Development (GD) Lakes I'orestTSDce Lake Minnetonka cf.' ...Mrmm OHWL Inventory I.D. # 974.5'162-P 985.5'161-W 930.5* 140-P 934.3' 930.0'« 970.9 159-P —154-? 1S7-P OHWL Protected Waters Inventory I.D. # 944.3'160-P 988.0*134-P 929.4*141-P 961.4*109-P OHWL Protected Waters Inventory I.D. # 929.4*139-P 929.4*133-P • •V‘‘> __^ D. ’■ ■■•■■• . Tributary Streams Painters Creek Stubbs Bay Creek Long Lake Creek Wolsfeld Creek Dickey Lake Creek -S'-7!SlT Subd. 8. Establishment of Shoreland Overlay District. The Shoreland Overlay District is hereby defined and established to Include the following lands within the City of Orono: A. All lands within 1000' of the Ordinary High Water level of the lakes classified Natural Environment# Recreational Development, and General Development in Subdivision 7 of this section. The Shoreland Overlay District includes lands vithin Orono that are located within 1000' of lakes located in adjacent cities, namely Hadley Lake in the city of Plymouth and Wolsfeld Lake in the city of Medina. B. All lands within 300' of the Ordinary High Water level of the watercourses classified as tributary stress in Subdivision 7 of this section. Where the flood plain of said tributary streams as defined in Section 10.55 or as defined elsewhere in the Orono Zoning Code extends further than 300 the Ordinary High Water level, the boundary of the Shoreiana Overlay District shall be extended to include those areas designated as flood plain. ‘ S Subd. 9. Interpretation of District Boundaries. In thelt Interpretation and application# the provisions of tnrs • iffiiiMrlli ..I I* '. i . 'fi *. • ■ f* r •i W section shall be held to >=® “ liberally construed in favor f granted by !A“ll^®belimitation or repeal of any otne p District shall be The boundaries of the Shoreian official map. Whe-e determined by scaling «-jract location of the boundaries Interpretation is needed as official mapr the City of t?e district as shown on on the Ordinary High e tiny aiiv* ------- j •an/i Building Permits Require •k Subd, 10. land J^lteration and^ Build ^ s°y^st^4^ Jririn"/f=?^"ies?""4d. other activities as reflated e Ihe City of Orono Municipal Code.y of Orono ------- „ 4nfr ^ subd. 11. =«^i^"“Vrtffica4"o/T44.T ”o»^^^^^ 4-hia section. This cerriix^a'- this ordinance. Any Conforms to the ”<5"i^®“®\Vvtrian^e%ith that author^^^^^^ 4«it shall be de^ed a ^^“Ijtion ^ section, punishable an provided in Subaivisi ^ ___mav only D subd. 12. variances. r Ts 2°"and a® o?her > £7,5“;;ir,-.i.«.. .......the issuance ux ui*«------ overlay District: A. Bvaluation Criwria. and soils possible pollution of public construction; ............ .,„.„otures and other 2- "‘’tj4«^\«ns\ViVe"df """ •acuities as viewed from public wat V. n'- f r. •-’f y' . ■• ,1-* •*. *■. • f • •< * 'H 4 IP 4 % I .. *. .*•» - 4 k , I'' . i?'il.. '::' :■. : U >-<r•'^V- .1 3. The site is adequate for water supply and on~site sewage treatment; and 4. The types, uses and numbers of watercraft that the project will generate are compatible in relation to the suitability of public waters to safely accomodate these watercraft. 1: r---% 5 -■ B. Conditions Attached to Conditional Use Permits. The City Council upon consideration of the criteria listed above and the purposes of this ordinance, shall attach such conditions to the issuance of the conditional use permits as it deems necessary ^ to fulfill the purposes of this ordinance. Such conditions may include but are not limited to the following: Water Level; 1.Increased setbanhs from the Ordinary High 2. Limitations on the natural vegetation to be removed or the requirement that additional vegetation be planted ; 3. Special provisions for the locations, design, and use of structures, sewage treatment systems, watercraft launching and docking areas, and vehicle parking areas. Subd. 14. Notifications to the Department of Natural Resources. Copies of all notices of any public hearings to consider variances, amendments, or conditional uses under this section must be sent to the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources and postmarked at least 10 days before the hearings. Notices of hearing to consider proposed subdivisions/plats must include copies of the subdivision/plat. Upon final action by the City Council, a copy of approved amendments and subdivisions/plats, and final decisions granting variances or conditional uses under this section must be sent to the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources and postmarked within 10 days of final action. Subd. 15. Zoning District Compliance with Minimum Requirements. The zoning district standards of Chapter 10 of the Orono Municipal Code currently comply with the lot size, lot width, permitted use and conditional use standards set forth by the Department of Natural Resources Shoreland Management Regulations, MR 6120.2500 - 6120.3900. The following City of Orono zoning districts are partially or fully located within the Shoreland Overlay District: LR-IA LR-IB LR-IC LR-lC-1 RR-IA RR-IB RR-lB-1 RS H . . B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 B~5 4 >■ • 'r;-' . ^ - ‘ I 'A ■V V •••-•• ► V' ♦ r V The following Orono zoning districts are also potentially <. 8 • *V * *• M * .*•^ .• • ,• » * • • ^ ^ » * ♦- \r • c »- - ‘.V5 •LT. # •IMP' I . 5. ■ Covenants or other equally effective legal tnatruments must be developed that specify which lot owners have uthority to use the access lot and what activities are allowed, he activities may include watercraft launching, loading, storage, aaching, mooring, or docking. They can also^ include other outdoor acreational activities that do not significantly conflict with general public use of the public water or the enjoyment of normal [property rights by adjacent property owners. Examples of the non- ' ignificant conflict activities include swimming, sunbathing, or icnicing. The covenants must limit the total number of vehicles |«i lowed to be parked and the total number of watercraft allowed to pe continuously moored, docked, or stored over water, siid must •ecuire centralization of all common facilities and activities in -be most suitable locations on the lot to minimize topographic and vegetation alterations. They must also require all parking areas, storage buildings, and other facilities to be screened by vegetation or topography as much as practical from view from the public water, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions. Such covenants are subject to City approval. C. Placement of Structures on Lots. When more chan one setback applies to a site, structures and facilities must be located to meet all setbacks. Structures shall be located as fellows: 1, Structure and On —site Sewage System Setbacks (in feet) from Ordinary High Water Level: 4-V public Water Classification Setbacks Structures Unsewered Sewered Sewage Treatment Svstem yr-4'- -.‘-'vf NE RD GD Tributary r ■n 150 100 75 100 150 75 75 75 150 75 75 75 'm' . ^ fii 2. Additional structure setbacks. The following additional structure setbacks apply, regardless of the classification of the water body; Setback from; ms mi : r - Top of bluff - Unplatted cemetery - Right-of-way line of federal, state or county highway and local public and private roads Setback (in feet) 30 50 30* Except for detached garages on lakeshore lots as reorulated in Section 10.03, Subd. 9 (D) and except for structures subject to less restrictive "side yard adjacent to street" setbacks as regulated in the various zoning districts. 3. Bluff impact zones. Structures-'and .•» • »• » • • * .viVv;’ • • • ■ ■ .. •• ;; - . - •* ■»• • : i' ' * ■'I ■Ki'^r:.:':;:?/-^;-:/ •1, n' '*'55^^=Kr» r. ■I 1 HH r ^ <y*"mj,;. ■„!M^ .: available for use within the shoreland areas U- B-6 PUD R-IB R-IA Any future changes within the zoning districts listed ' above shall meet the ONR regulations effective 7-3-89. Subd. 16. Shoreland Overlay District Standards. The Shoreland Overlay District Standards are in addition to the requirements set forth in Chapter 10 for the various zoning districts. In case of conflict, the most restrictive provision applies. ‘ ' • A. Minimum Lot Area/Lot Width Standards. Minimum lot area and lot width standards of rhe underlying zoning district shall apply, with the following exceptions; 1. No lot within 1000 feet of a General Dcvelooment Lake and approved for duplex use per Section 10.20, Subd. 3" (5) shall be less than 135 feet in width nor less than 26,000 square feet in area if riparian, nor less than 17,500 square feet in area if non-riparian. 2. No lot within 300' of a tributary and approved for duplex use per Section 10.20, Subd. 3 (I) shall be less than 150 feet in width when no sewer is available, nor less than 115 feet in width when sewer is available. B. Lakeshore Access Lots. Lots intended as ^’ccesses to public waters or as recreation areas for use by owners of non—riparian lots within subdivisions are permissible and must meet the following minimum standards: 1. Any such lakeshore access lot shall be designated as an outlot, and shall not be considered as a buildable residential lot. . 2. Such an outlot shall not be subject to minimumi lot area or width standards, except that the number of inland non-riparian lots which may gain access via such outlot shall not exceed the number obtained by dividing the outlot width C measured a the shoreline by the required zoning district lot width, rounued down to the nearest whole number. 3. Such outlot shall be jointly owned by all owners of non—riparian lots in the subdivision who are provided riparian access rights on the access outlot. 4.. No such access outlot shall be created as part of a subdivision plat except when the building lots within the subdivision are separated by an existing public or private roadway from the lakeshore, and the land on either side of the roadway was in common ownership as of the effective date of this ordinance.^ ^ I -fHiiir " m ' i . • r-.. .■ ^ accessory facilitiesr except stairways, landings, must not be placed within bluff impact zones. and lock boxes 4. Uses without water-oriented needs. Uses without water-oriented needs must be located on lots or parcels i without public waters frontage, or, if located on lots or parcels with public waters frontage, must either be set back double the normal Ordinary High Water level setback or be substantially screened from view from the water by vegetation or topography, assxifiiing summer, leaf-on conditions. 5. Fences, docks, retaining walls. No fence shall he placed within the shore setback zone. Portions of dock locatf ’ landward of the OHWL shall be considered as a landing, subject the regulations for landings per Subdivision 16 (F) of this section. Retaining walls shall not be placed within the shore setback zone. ^4 6. Average lakeshore setback. No principal or accessory structure shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots, except that this does not apply to stairways, lifts, landings, and lockboxes. Further, the average lakeshore setback shall apply only to classified lakes, and shall not apply to tributaries. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. D. Minimum Lowest Floor Elevations. All structures located within the Shoreland Overlay District which are subject to the flood plain regulations of Section 10.55 of this ordinance shall be placed at an elevation consistent with the requirements of that section. The regulatory flood protection l#levation shall be established as set forth in Section 10.55, Subd. 7 of this code. All structures constructed within the Shoreland Overlay District shall have their lowest floor, including basement, placed at an elevation no lower than the regulatory flood protection elevation. Where the regulatory flood plain elevation cannot reasonably be determined, the minimum elevation at which^ the lowest floor, including basement, may be placed shall be determined as follows; ^ 1. For lakes, by placing the lowest floor at a level at least 3 feet above the highest known water level, or 3 feet above the Ordinary High Water Level, whichever is higher. 2. For rivers and streams, by placing the lowest floor at least 3 feet above the flood of record. E. Water-oriented Accessory Structures. The only water-oriented accessory structure allowed to be located nearer the Ordinary High Water Level than the normal structure setback as^ specified in this section shall be a lock box no greater than 20 square feet in area and no higher than 48 inches in height. Such a structure requires a building permit from the City. *• * •' . #• • •* / a* • * . "V . '; .*/: * . . . ,1, ^* > m % * %■ ■ '.■i<-• . i : <-r'- ■ k F. Stairways, Lifts and Landings. Stairways and lifts are the preferred alternative to major topographic alterations for achieving access up and down bluffs and steep slopes to shore areas. Stairways, lifts and landings shall be allowed in the shore setback zone and must meet the following design requirements: ^ ;1. Stairwavs and lifts must not exceed 4 feet in width. 2. Landings for stairways and lifts shall not esd^ed 32 square feet in area. ^ 3, Canopies or roofs are not allowed on stairways, lifts, or landings. 4. Stairways, lifts and landings may be either constructed above the ground on posts or pilings or placed into tile ground, provided they are designed and built in a manner that ensures control of soil erosion. 5. Stairways, lifts and landings must be located in the most visually inconspicuous portions of lots, as viewed from the surface of the public water assuming summer, leaf- on cianditions, whenever practical. 6. Facilities necessary to provide shore area access to physically handicapped persons shall be allowed provided ■chat the dimensional and performance standards of subitems 1-5 are completed in addition to the requirements of the Minnesota Regulations, Chapter 1340. 7. A building permit shall be obtained for construction of stairways, lifts and landings regardless of whether such improvements are constructed aibove, at or below grade. G. Steep Slopes. Any applicant requesting a permit for construction of sewage treatment systems, roads, driveways, structures, or other improvements on steep slopes, shall provide adequate information to allow the City to evaluate possible soil erosion impacts and development of visibility from public waters before such permit may be issued. When determined necessary, conditions shall be attached tc issued permits to prevent erosion and preserve existing vegetation screening of structures, vehicles, and other facilities as viewed from the surface of public waters, assuming summer, leaf-on vegetation. H. Height of Structures. No structure within the Shoreland Overlay District shall exceed the height limitations set forth in the standards for the underlying zoning district. Vegetation Alterations. No live tree within 75 feet of'the .•fc viV--. ^ , TN/-- ;— t .hor.ll.. .!« . «^^^ -iilFs 'oV-.s;=i‘.'A sm sL”r^%"t^:qiire%^;ermi^ but such trees must be inspected by City staff prior to their removal. i the shorel/ne an^d^^s\7ep’7l\^e\" witt^n“4"/ ^??::in^“V£ "4res^l\ny Sire is conditions, is not substantially reduced. j'4 , -J.Topographic Alterations/Grading and Filling grading and filling permit. ^of sewage tlettment^lysT^m'^s/a^^'dlive'';^ adhere to the grading and filling standards of this section. „„hi«.L .»hl» ii' o,“.”.“o”'inU;“lU public wattrs enumerated in Subdivision 7 of this section. b^con^rruc^ d Ifthln Trnot be construcrec x . . cnVi/i^ vlsic3n 7 of this sectxon. Ifthe public waters enumerated xn Subdivlsxon / or ,.„hnect to the take into account the following consxderatxons: #- a. Such improvements shall be I, take advantage of natural,n«v4innm screening from view from public waters. rti?y'^“tirteirwTtt jurisdiction. -*•* ■i. •'.li" A i • * • . •/ O'.,v. • • XSr. ‘4 •A I J , .i" iii o: 4. Except for those projects requiring permits for construction of structuresr sewage treatment systems, and driveways, a land alteration permit will be required as follows; a. For movement of 1-10 0 cubic yards of material anywhere within the Shoreland Overlay District, a staff issued lamd alteration permit shall be required. b. For movement of more than 100 cubic yards of material anywhere within the Shoreland Overlay District, conditional use permit approval by the City Council is required in addition to the rsquired land alteration permit. 5, The following considerations and conditions must be adhered to during the issuance of construction permits, grading and filling permits, conditional use permits, variances and subdivision approvals: a. Grading or filling in any Type 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8 wetland must be evaluated to determine how extensively the proposed activity would affect the following functional qualities of the wetland: (1) and retention; (2) prevent ^or reduce flood damage; Sediment and pollutant trapping Storage of surface run-off to (3) (4) (5) (6) Fish and wildlife habitat; Recreational use; Shoreline or bank stabilization; Noteworthiness, including spe cial qualities such as historic significance, critical habitat for endangered plants and animals, or others. This evaluation must also Include a determination of whether the wetland alteration being proposed requires permits, reviews, or approvals by other local State or Federal agencies including but not limited to watershed districts, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, or the United States Army Corps of Engineers. b. Alterations must be designed and conducted in a manner that ensures only the smallest amount of bare ground is exposed for the shortest tJ^e possible; c. Mulches or similar materials must be used, where necessary, for temporary bare soil coverage, and a permanent vegetation cover must be established as soon as possxble; d. Methods to minimize soil erosion and to trap sediments before they reach any surface water feature must be used;• t i'.L -‘f ■Sj.- m •-1 A S ’ ' .. . . XH \ ; ... • » . • »• • •• ' * • • *1 ••!•**.* * • • * *►..*. /..*•, • -. • •* •* ** *'' • • : •• • '♦ V.‘.» ■ *' :»-• ’ ■ ..’V; • ••• ■ •' •“ ;•> ‘-‘i: T’ f “ f >• l> ■/ ^ -rl ,nj>r i.' ill ife. . 'T-r '' y-^•T' .e • Altered areas must be stabilized to acceptable local soil and water conservation |fs«!=t\“=^?d“he ^tVd ftate\" S^ofl Conservation Service; f Fill or excavated material must not be placed in a manner that'creates an unstable slope; a Plans to place fill or excavated 5^ 1 «« he reviewed by the City Engineer for conSnu\d°“sloprstability and must not create finished slopes of 30% or greater; he Fill or excavated material must not be placed in bluff impact rones; mi i. Any alterations below the Co^isSioLr^f^^^^^^ Statutesf Seciton 105.42; V, . 1= ... °.”.U and^do °no®t adversely affect adjacent or nearby property; k. Placement of natural rock rip rap, including associated sloc^^ filter blanket, extent of the 3 feet horizontal to 1 ' Hich Water Level, and the rip rap is within 10 ^° ® Ordinary H-’’ ch Water Level does not height of the rip rap above ^ obtained per the leq^rrVentVoi Secti'o^n lofof, Subdivisions 22, 23 and 24 of this zoning code. „here the intended p^!:;.°r'tlV’n-t l*'atra\^ -sot-s %“n^r=o\her i^.encies with concurrent jurisdiction. K. Storm Water tb° th^“ stln^ Orono Municipal Code: ^SnieTTto're?i“\Vr discharge to public waters. 2 A development must be Pl®"f®^,_t2d Srefsf^5fn-ofl v2lSliti«? er“Ln^po?entia^,® “J^duce and delay ■'f* l ■ M • , *«■ • %. • i .. , ^ ■ • ^ .• ♦ , 'V “ -41 • •• » • • •• . ' » ' ••.., I*. / ■•*•.••*•’ ’■♦ '*’*..‘** ■ ;%**•*« •. .V* / •••.'••. •■ *. •* •■ • :r^'.;r v • - ’ . •• ; . • .•■ - T:. .;s-. ^ # e .*. % . • ^ « I >1* *«>.Va1^ >■ ..^.,1 A'jj iAMmA, w run-off volumes. Disturbed areas must be stabilized and protected as soon as possible and facilities or methods used to retain sediment on the site. 3. When development density, topographic features, £md soil and vegetation conditions are not sufficient to adequately handle storm water run-off using natural features and vegetation, various types of constructed facilities such as diversions, settling basins, skimming devices, dikes, waterways, and ponds may be used. Preference must be given to designs using surface drainage, vegetation, and infiltration rather than buried pipes and manmade materials £ind facilities. 4. When constructed facilities are used to perform-, water management, documentation must be provided by a registered professional civil engineer that they are designed and installed consistent with the field office technical guide of the local soil and water conservation district. 5. New constructed storm water outfalls to public waters must provide for filtering or settling of suspended solids and skimming of surface debris before discharge. L.Hardcover Limitations. 1. No hardcover or impervious surface shall be placed, located, or constructed within 75 feet of the Ordinary High Water Level of any lake or tributary, except for stairways, lifts, landings, and lockboxes as regulated elsewhere in the Municipal Code. 2. Between 75 feet and 250 feet of the OHWL there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. Between 250 feet and 500 feet of the OHWL there shall be no greater than 30% hardcover. Between 500 feet and 1000 feet of the OHWL there shall be no greater them 35% hardcover. Public Uses. M. Standards for Commercial, Public, and Semi- 1. Surface water-oriented commercial uses and public or semi-public uses with similar needs to have access to and ase of public waters may be located on parcels or lots with frontage on public waters, if permitted by the underlying zoning listrict standards. Those uses with water-oriented needs must meet Idle following standards: a. In addition to meeting impervious (overage (hardcover) limits, setbacks, and other zoning standards n this ordinance, the uses must be designed to incorporate opographic and vegetative screening of parking areas and tructures. b. Uses that require short-term stercraUft mooring for patrons must centralize these facilities, and. • ./ My ■Ji i-H I •• • _ •• •••• , • • .. • . •' . . ■ .'V .♦ i- • • ‘ S’ . .j /.•,» • • I-?;. r. p . J ■m m:m < A r - ■ A ' : '.>i.t' C*'./ ..d.sign them to avoid obstructions o| navigation and to be the I Tninimum size necessary to meet the C. Uses that depend on patrons arriving the following general standards. (1) No advertising signs or supporting Ca°ilibies.for sig^ may be place^^^ P“ waters. Signs a public authority or under aplaced in or on public waters ny a pu permit issued by the County Sheriff. fa& (2) Signs may be placedr lecessa'ry, within the abore setoack zone if they are^^^^^ size to be the \°„d na ”® ^he establishment They must only convey bhe locatxo . available. The signs and the general t^es ^oods “^/^^^^ion such as product brands anf pri\e”” must not be ^gher ^iriullnated ryTrtifTciaTlightsTVhe l^fs must .e shielded or directed to prevent illumination out across public wate.s. (3) The aggregate square footage of u T 1 ssvceed the limitations on sign .> (4) Non-sign related outside lighting may be ^u^\d^ primarfl^^^ ilt’4fnate ”%tLtrflpublic «3bers only if it IS used p^ otherwise directed to prevent llitll iYl“m\®naSfon out across public waters. This does not preclude use of navigational lights. *»7-: located on lots or Ordinary High Water Level setback or topography/ assuming summer, iear >.E N. ^7? Agricultural Use Standards. 1 When permitted in the underlyirg zoning district, general cultivation far “ing^ bi SrilieVrn”the^'sl=o^re^%«e^^^ activity shall occur within slopes/ shore setback zone and standards: 2.Animal feedlots must meet the following • •• -rrnpKK..- ■ . . . • . . v. v .njA.-ii.Jb,i raaintli Iill^iifiML :* ?■ ’ Itm.'-’ ' ■ T*v4- ■ -'jd?' •vjf a. New feed lots, if permitted, must not tie located in the shoreland of watercourses or in bluff impact zones and must meet a minxmum setback of 300 feet from the Ordinary High Water Level of all public waters basins? and b. Modifications or expansions to existing feedlots that are located within 300 feet of the Ordinary High Water Level or within a bluff impact zone are allowed if they do not further encroach into the existi^ : ,-r.‘inary High Water Level setback or encroach on bluff impact zon^ 0, Forest Management Standards. The harvesting of timber and associated reforestation must be conducted consistent with the provisions of the Minnesota Non—Point Source Pollution Assessment—Forestry and the provisions of ^Water Quality in Forest Mamagement "Best Management Practices in Minnesota". P. Extractive Hse Standards. 1. Site Development and Restoration Plan. An extractive use site development and restoration plan must be developed, approved, and followed over the course of operation o£ the site. The plan must address dust, noise, possible pollutant discharges, hours and duration of operation, and anticipate Jivegetation and topographic alterations. It must also identify 'actions to be taken during operation to mitigate adverse environmental impacts, particularly erosion, and must clearly explain how the site will be rehabilitated after extractive activities end. 2. Setbacks for Processing Machinery. Processing machinery must be located consistent with setback standards for structures from Ordinary High Water Levels of public waters and from bluffs. Q. Water Supply. Any public or private supply of water for domestic purposes must meet or exceed standards for water quality of the Minnesota Department of Health and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. R. Sewage Treatment. Any premises used for human occupancy must be provided with an adequate method of sewage treatment per Municipal Code Section 12.30. On-site sewage treatment systems must be setback from the Ordinary High Water Level in accordance with the setbacks contained in Section Subdivision 16 (C). Non-conforming sewage treatment systems shall be regulated and upgraded in accordance with Subd. 17 of this ordinance. S. Significant historic sites. No structure may be placed on a significant historic site in a manner that affects the values of the site unless adequate information about the site has been removed and documented in a public repository. ■••j . > ■V m ^v: # ■> -'V m . ‘ .' •* • * * *• • . . ’ • **.*•.. ... . V**” I / •- * * ♦ .. C' • . *■ * ■ * - i . ■ -.r ■ ; ■W-’ sub.. 17. r.r.'X^‘uVv»i.*^^ nonconformities Statutes and as regulated elsewhere insubject to applicable State Statutes a followxng the Orono Municipal Code. m snor« standards shall also apply: r 1-. *■ 1 bV;.Xi'«ri \3dV V.St«u.ur... .11 Si,“ % ‘it- |j^r.iv.rura;‘u»ius ..»s..b. C. Nonconforming n* Section ^12.30 nonconforming otsiricM must be upgradedand located within the Shoreland Overlay variance ^prlv^^i^ns orL\\Yo'n ^l^flO^Thrif a°pT^y"Vll^shcreland areas. Subd, 13. Subdivision/Platting Provisions. ■' A. Land Suitability. Each lot =re^ pilSnId subdivision, including JL^^^lsewher^ the Zoning and Residential Developments a“th°“|®f„®^|rn2tural state f°r the Platting Codes, must be suitaoi analvzinc the suitabili'-y proposed use with minimal a city shall consider susceptibility of land for a specific 3®"?1 and rock formations with to flooding, exist^ce o . ^ seve7*e erosion potential, steep severe limitations for sewage treatment topography, "ati” olnd^tions unsuitable for water- capabilities, near-shore ^ii^life habitat, presence of rirnlA “cYn%“"hi°s;oS"cniyes, or a^^^ lu“Ee"feli^lenVs ^o1 ^h%"”p^rUored^^bd ‘rvi^aLA or of L.e conm.unity. •v « . • • ■Tfi . %1 h .b.7b b„,b„> Subdivision will not would be needed to use the more standards in the ®°"^'°„eas not served by publicly lots for their intended J^idivision will not be «PP5°^*^ owned sower and water sy/*=^f;„®„a^r supply and sewage unless adequate and confora J ^ lot in conformance with Section systems can be provided for e . , .1. shall meet the minimum lot 12.30 of the Municipal elsewhere in the Codesize and dimensional req^rements set including at least a minj^um oonti^o . of two standard limiting factors ®“*^^®^®"^ts°that would require use of holding soil treatment systems. Lots that wouxu m ’’ ■ ;.^r* . • • . e' '* •#* V \ ‘ • S e • S • - . * *.: .. - •* • • •> • > ■■ i tanks must not be approved. ■< C, Xn£ormat£on Requirements. Sufficient information must be submitted by the applicant for the City to m^e a determination of land suitability. In addition to information required by other provisions of the Zoning and Platting Codesr tne following information shall also be submitted: ^ * 1, Topographic contours at 2 foot intervals showing limiting site characteristics. 2. The surface water features required in Minnesota Statutes Section 505.02/ Subdivision If to be shown on platSf obtained from United States Geological Survey quadrangle topographic maps or more accxirate sources. 3. Adequate soils information to detemine suitability for building and on-site sewage treatment capabilities Cor every lot from the most current existing sources or from field Investigations such as soil borings, percolation tests, or other nethods. 4. Information regarding adequacy of domestic #ater supply; extent of anticipated vegetation and topographic liberations; near-shore aquatic conditions, including depths, jf bottom sediments, and aquatic vegetation; ^d proposed methods for controlling storm water run-off and erosion, both during and ifter construction activities. 5. Location of 100 year flood plain areas and locdway districts from existing adopted maps or data. 6. A line or contour representing the Irdinary High Water Level, the toe and the top of bluffs, and the linimum building setback distances from the top of the bluff and he lake or stream. D. Dedications. When a land or easement edication is a condition of subdivision approval, the approval ust provide easements over natural drainage or ponding areas for anagement of storm water and significant wetlands, as regulated in action 10.55 of the zoning code. E. Lakeshore Access Lots. Lots intended as ccesses to public waters or as recreational areas for use by wners of non-riparian lots within a subdivisican ®ust xceed the minimum standards set forth in Subdivision 16 of this action. Subd. 19. PRD/PUD Standards. A. Types of Allowed Planned Developments. Bsidential Planned Unit Developments ("Planned Residential svelopments" or "PRDs") are allowed in the Shoreland Overlay Lstrict for new projects on undeveloped land, redevelopmen^t or •1' I}? '' ■ * :.*« •• • • .1 • V • ^ 1* ' • • * • * I •» . .‘k •* ,*.. * * . . . •». * • ••4 . * •••. •• • • ^ * 1 f* **.'** 1 . * •* •: rrv ;• ? .^v;.vt-^ V" • j*' '• \'V- *•'.*. ' • 'V/'\-v ’V-'. */*’'■ •••7 • ■ - ■ V •' -Aj-r ‘ • • ... “ I f : V . • f A M W:■ 11 ■ •T-:,.r^- -n—.T-rr Wiously built ilenkfied in tht individual zoning district descriptions in the zoning chapter. The following exclusion applies: m m 1. Rezoning to M-6 and development via the M- •6 PRD Shall not be allowed within the Shoreland Overlay District. J . llVt^Y 23? isel The follow^Jng further restriction shall ilv:apply --5:=3!LSm”£consistency with DNR requirements for shoreland areas. individual zoning district standards. D. Application for a Planned ResJ.dential doIuments?^in ^dd^tio^n^^^^^ 10.32, prior to final action being taken on tne app request; 1. A site plan and/or plat for showing locations of property t^g5®|aeil\*tie^s^^ land :ftrrttIon%"‘^ 3"el?g°e \Var/eft""d rater°%\%l^"%\^--'(where piblic systlis will not be provided), and topographic contours at 2 ^ foot intervals. this ordinance. 3, Deed restrictions, covenants, permanent easements or other instruments that; and beaching of watercraft; 4.Those additional documents as requested, by Hh-' > ■-vi' -.V'.; .V ' y:^ j ■ ■ Jibat: ■P'.f p: 'f the City of Orono that are necessary to explain how the PRD will be designed and will function. E. Site "Suitable Area" Evaluation. Proposed new or .xpansions to existing PRDs must be evaluated using the 1. The project parcel must be divided into tiers bv locating one or more lines approximately parallel to a line that identifies the Ordinary High Water Level at the following intervals, proceeding landward: Shoreland Tier Dimensions •eA Unsewered Sewered (feet)(feet) 200 200 267 200 267 267 400 320 300 300 t ■ General development lakes- first tier General development laJces- second and additional tiers Recreational development lakes Natural environment lakes :Tributaries , 2. The suitable area within calculated bl excluding from the tier area all wetlands, bluffs or land below the Ordinary High Water Level of ^^e suitable area and the proposed project are then sub^ec . PRD density evaluation steps to arrive at an allowable number of dwelling units or sites. ^ F. PRD 'Allowable Density' Evaluation. The procedures for determining the allowable density of a PRD is as follows: 1. The suitable area within each tier is divided by the single residential 1°^ underlying zoning district, yielding the allowable . . dwlling lilts or%ites for each tier (Fractions f down to the nearest whole number, but may be transferred as noted below). 2. Allowable densities or numbers of units or excess fractions of units may be transferred from any tier to any other tier further from the water body, but must not b transferred to any other trer closer. 3. No density increases based on increased s^Backs or other factors will be allowed.t A Maintenance and Administration Requirements. 1. Before final approval of a PRD, adequate , a. y ’ • .. .. • ^ • • . • * ^ i . w.jK-ia _ l^visions must be °for 'Sci“st®“crand fc 2* °P«“ ta“'®u41I^Vearcatiorand restrictions, ff^^lertive and pemanent means must beacceptance or other equally effect^ maintenance of open 5ra"='-%"henns%%rer^^^^^ following protections: f Commercial uses prohibited. vegetation and topographic alterations other than routine maintenance prohibited. . jm ^ • A- JC Construction of additional buildings S storage of vehicles and other materials prohibits . I • d. oncontrolled beaching of watercraft prohibited Vf tive^all“^nativ“'^^^^^ 2^t^”isUr“wh^"n"^licablc,^ -st use an owners association with the following feature . ^ a. Membership must be mandatory for eacn swelling unit^or site purchaser and any successive purchase.s- c ..4a . » _ ____________ 4* Of .rfff b Each member must pay a pro ”ha share If'^he Association;s expenses, and unpaid assessments can liens on units or sites. c. Assessments must be adjustable to iccomodate changing conditions. A The Association must be responsibled. The ASSOC commonly owned cor insurance, .taxes, and maintenance pji^opsrty SLud facilities • H open space Requirements. PRO'S must contain ,pen space meeting all of the following criteria: 1 At least 50% of the total project area mst be preserved as open space .v: 2. The following items shall not be included n the computation of‘minimum onen space: mw Dwelling units or sites. •Road rightS “Of —way. Land covered by road surfaces. 1 .■ , 23 .. •**- » • . . - • provxsions must be developed for preservation and maintenance in perpetuity of open spaces and for the continued existence and fimcticning of the development. 2. Open Space Preservation. Deed restrictions/ covenants/ permanent easements/ public dedication and acceptance or other equally effective and permanent means must be provided to ensure long-term preservation and maintenance of open space. The instruments must include all of the following protections: a. Commercial uses prohibited. b. Vegetation and topographic alterations other than routine maintenance prohibited. 1'^' c. Construction of additional buildings or storage of vehicles and other materials prohibited. t d. Uncontrolled beaching of watercraft prohibited. 3. Development, organization and functioning. Unless an equally effective alternative community framework is established/ when applicable/ all PRD's must use an owners association with the following features: a. Membership must be mandatory for each dwelling unit or site purchaser and any successive purchasers. :4-b. Each member must pay a pro rata share of the Association’s expenses, and unpaid assessments can become L liens on units or sites. ■ ^ c. Assessments must be adjustable to accomodate changing conditions. d. for insurance, taxes, and property and facilities. The Association must be responsible maintenance of all commonly owned H. Open Space Requirements. PRD’s must contain open space meeting all of the following criteria:■V 1^' S’ 1. At least 50% of the total project area must be preserved as open space. 2* The following items shall not be included in the computation of minlmian open space: Dwelling units or sites. b. - Road rights-of-way. Land covered by road surfaces. -r % •. .-.v ■IPP^St: /•• • allowance in tiers near the lake may be used in tiers further from the lake • Centraliration aAd desl^'oVL\mties“ atd°llActu«^ multdone according to the following standards: 1 PRD's must be connected to publicly owned slwage treatment ^t^®^nd“ s^f f icient^ Umiting fictols^m«t leTotilll lor a\eplace«ent soil treatment system for each sewage system. ^ 2. Dwelling units or sites must be <r»4-o ott€ or more groups and located on suitable areas of the development. They must be ^®si^ed and located to meet o^^^ the following dimensional standards for the reievanu classification; Setback from the Ordinary High Water Level• r.-j^ % features. Elevation above the surface water "Sfi-n mi W-Maximum height V 3 Shore recreation facilities including but n* limited to swimming areas, docks and ?llLa\\oH"oriuYtalfiliry L°sVlltluL lTonlld%%ltTol"lf land slope requirements in Chapter 5 of the Orono Municipal Code. 4. Structures. Parking areas ^Sb"L^^^wa\%rs"\^nd\d^^^^^^^^^ shoreltSrs b'/vVgetgo{, ^ screening must be preserved, if exxsting, or may be requxrea .. ' T ' ■ ■- 4' ■■ am A: m t,.-- I ■ “f ■>.. rV: ; ""'iliiiiinirt ~iftir Ai 1 ?JV'.■ \A'. * ' >“^ . provided • d '* rincnn°?tructrrYVelblck ■'and^m^ tfose pedestr^n access and equipment Storage structures allowed elsewhere in this code. ^X1 of the following standards are met. development and these standards must be identifie . -2S 3. Shore setback zone and bluff impact zone «..<^-l.ncles must be evaluated and reasonable improvements be made is^part of the conversion. These improvements must inc-ude where Ipplicable the following: a. Removal of extraneous buildings, locks, or other facilities that no longer need to be located i shore setback zone or bluff impact zone. b. Remedial measures to correct erosion sites and improve vegetative cover and screening of ui mgs )ther facilities as viewed from the water. c. If existing dwelling units are .ocated in the shore setback zone ihall be attached to /i. Existing dwelling unit or anaities that exceed the ^ ^o^be lu^reased, either S^tilinV a”al“il°“use, 7^3\\\^Yng\°ew“sewa|eantralizing shore recreation facilities, installing new reatment systems, or other means. .. .=s=v.";, €■ t’-; . ■ • . '-?v t •-%. :3 • *uiU •'fir IHV -'.-7 . ^ f ^ 7%^ - -Miances to o°^land altJration^within |ro\ected e:?r.nl ”?"lf;o/pTain areas or she eXands Noth^^^^^^^^^^ aatablish building and zoning restrictions only. ^ Subd. 21. Amendments. All amendments to thi^e^^ including amendments to °^1 Resources prior to Commissioner of the Department of . „ zoning district adoption. Farther, amendments to underlyin^^^^ Department of Katural llesources. prior to adoption. % % ! ' Section 2. Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.02, Definitions, is hereby revised as follows: A,. jst?“r-=“a; w'a" follows; ■iW 13. "Building Height" " "Fhe Jf®rtical^d ^t between the highest adjoining ground leve i^^er and the top feet above the l»«eat ground level, whichever^« ^ of che cornice of a flat roo^, o _ther arch type roof, or the or the uppermost point on a roun Ditched or hipped roof, average height of the hig es^ gn adjoining ground level above Topographic changes ”^1=^ «levate t “’ngidered in determining the existing terrain shall not be oonsicer building height. ♦ B. Definition 43, "lot Width", is hereby repealed and the following definition inserted in its place. p, 43. "Lot Width" - The horizontal distance between side lot lines measured at the following locations. a For lots which do not abut a « «. V..r r.,.l..b f,o». " parallel to the front lot line. t For lots which abut a lake or at the shoreline measured in a atraight l^e between «>e Shich the side lot !«Lu?^' in a strai/ht line S:?S^^rt\e-rolnfs oTi“nt"e^rse°c“tfok ortre'sfdl“ot lines with the structure setback line. liij • r * \ ' ; if - ■ I . • *. . ,e *■ a*. , • * Sfe:- • ’ • * -w . •%* ... #"*. » iv . : *. I * .V f. '■ P’ • •• •'••V • / V.-V-’*-^ .. ..-k:. .. .'-f;- .. - ,...b : . JljUt..!-., -V . ■ . .ti.lii&Al.. . ■fflk'*,,. ...... F' t'' ^ '-s Definition 69, "Structure", is hereby repealed and the following definition inserted in its place: 69. "Structure" - Anything, or part thereof, which attached to something having a location on the groun , r water. V.'. Li'#- Section 3. Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.55, and Wetlands Management, is hereby amended as follows: Flood Plain A Section 10.55, Subdivision 3, Definition 10. High Water Mark", is hereby repealed and the following de ini inserted in its place: .ounaarv o. that point where the natural wftS? ordikWttgh°wat«® llv%Tll ‘the' ^fpetlll^rel'evation of the normal ^?Te%d°ttparrett^:i\^rt\V/l °^four^Vs ttrce^Ja^pL “rinlicated in Section 10.56 of the Orono Muncxpal Code. Section 4. Section 11.03, Subdivision Regulation Definitions, is hereby revised as follows: - A Section 11.03, Definition 28 "Lot, Width" is hereby deleted and ttt ISllowing definition inserted in its place: 28. "Lot Width" - The horizontal distance between side lot lines measured at the following locations: .. bb. v.„ '.V r -/."bV .^*.‘.*-5 parallel to the front lot line. between the points of intersection of the side lot lines wiun structure setback line.• • e .- ■: t-'i ------ i..<> .fi**:-***.' ‘ / 1., >>■' ■/ •J' 1^- ; *. • I ■i: VwmlmM iiil^ HI ii feff:;;J m. B fmSMmmm mmi Kiih m-mt: MM wm 'mm m fell mm •llli*!*m- KSi Ka- •':f3 wm& tess fci»g>i>r-^.:.vlV ■•r''>^:'TgWaft:-s| k. • ■.- \ - -rimMamM. mM-,m r-:=v;\,i;a5a ‘’ai ;v:;;=a P-'iiifrF-^mMmrnm ■pp .^- • Sr-";i flam.MmmI*. > .:.‘*.J' ■ ; m iii SKI -a i?i felil mmmwMmmMmm- wsiiiiipK^fciiii^^^^^:-:>/v;/r.=^-:' •; //•^■r'/V^ .-a- avr-^v-y . d't '■■''. \v- '•-• . •..*: . : ., ^m^rnmFk wm: ••••.rj>'v. r-v^ ■,f;-i '.., •i. -f- ! ■ % i^v V': ml:, ^■■: r ' --^. F •■ V ; .' , ■‘■•4. ••■;... . . • k *■ :■>• ■» • . • • • * V_^. «k ** , » » ‘ •• •*• % * V. \ _«_• -:«- 4 7» ’ * • . *** > ^**^’* •« A »cr^ a,rrvrvr;','r::. • :S ‘k'-'-V" /-M >*r*>*'*"v ; -I ■ .. :• 3^.—,v. ' f • ^3 M >. ■ •-. V Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorser City Administrator Pros Date:A- Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator March 10, 1992 Subject: Repeal of Ordinance No. 96, 2nd Series, Interim Moratorium on Granting of Land Subdivisions within Shoreland Areas Council adopted the ordinance for new Shoreland Regulations within the City at their February 24th meeting. Council directed that an ordinance repealing the current interim ordinance be scheduled before the Planning Commission at their March 16, 1992 meeting for formal accion and recommendation to Council. It is Council's plan to act on thi^ repeal of the interim ordinance at their March 23, 1992 meeting. ^lie Planning Commission may formally review and make a recommendation on all subdivision applications but preliminary subdivision approval cannot be granted by the Council until they have acted on the repeal of the interim ordinance on March 23rd. The enclosed ordinance has recommendation. been drafted for your review and . -. • I«li ‘ 1V-•fc ■i =MuJj( msMm ,ViM lud i ‘■sWIliil mm it ilHii / ■ n'S-. *5-*1®! --■y ^ ' a i -v.g¥ J:.;a Mmm L¥3mS!.-”%•mmm i. f •'.i* • sd ikii m 'lil •>rfiMi mm lii ■ V • . -:-\afS.'. r\r..-.V .• * yi ■:V /V' >■/<'.ri^: ORDINAHCS «SBCOHD SERIES r#i V35TT i • AH ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA, i REPEALING ORDINANCE #96, 2ND SERIES ADOPTING AN INTERIM MORATORIUM ON THE GRANTING OP LAND SUBDIVISIONS ••.. >. The City Council of the City of Orono ordains: The Municipal Code of the City of Orono is amended by repealing Ordinance #96, Second Series, an ordinance establishing an interim moratorium on the granting of land subdivisions that have not received preliminary approval from the City, adopted by the City ? vl on the 26th day of August, 1991, and to be effective through Au-^i »6, 1992. . .-.V This Ordinance becomes effective from and after its ^ .asage and publication in accordance with law. Passed by the City Council this 23rd day of March, 1992 by a vote of ayes and _ _ _nays. ^ r Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor -y'' ‘♦■V Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk kiU & < r : - ^• ■ jt- a'. . Vv.K. Published; Week of March 30, 1992 ddkii ■• -o "V v'' X mMi. ':'SM : ' ^ * * * ♦ • wV • . V'■ f‘': ■&, V. ?C:',; ■ ■" :.v ‘ V- ■. /> 1.^ ite"'■S^'w i - ,‘v -t#'- --- fv5’- •y''?5'.‘v' ■ ^ ■ S •■ C;v::v’'v^ ■ ■ ■ ..■ ■ . •, if!/ V ■ .i K..V >v ’ ^ y ' mM m --"'■ > . • 'f. -y ) ‘■a ' ' V . . ■•'. » ■Mifciii s V::v t'. ■. -■ ■ :.■■■ ^ * '' 5' ORDINANCE NO. 96.2nd S«iM QRANTINQ OF LAND SUBDIVISIONS THAT HAVE NOT RECEWED PHELIMtIARY APPROVAL FROM THE CfTY THE Cmr OF OflONO ORDAINS: Th» MunicipM Cod# of th« Ciy olOiOM IsiinondMtby addbigOrdinanoota. 92:2nd SECTION 1. g»t*fn«nt pf Poitv. T^ CIlvOOMncil Indi itwt m* City is pfMondy «id 300 idM or th* «ood ploto of coi^ Kftuttri— wiitin ttio Cliy limiu. Tho City it in «w proottt of studying and P«P^9 oowpftAtnsNo amondflioot of l» Nwolino ;Z3tMT^oOtyCouneilMstfM9wrolt an otorwholming probabUiiy that th^ino roguladont will nood to^ “JJSSSirTlw aiy Coonei alto Inito tf« turt Mwndmon» cannot bo accompllt^ wtll furtftor aludy hat botn compoiod and a '^"jBnco onacBntnt of toeh amandtnontt wB undoubWdly modify oaitiino raguiaiK^ omaminQ tubdMaion of land, tfw pro^^ itf^ppB^faMA^iHalniwImDarlod would K-SiSiSS.5Mitta sM aai. m tao^.Tha CItj; Council ftatwr linda dwi it would ba unwita. imoiDpar. giaeiMnaion and urtfatr advantagi^ a f^ M M davimant of 6«a tntoa Qiy. Tharaiora. 6ta City Council finds it naoattary and Bnaopnata to adopt an jn^m O^nanoa Burtuant to Mlnnatota Slaiutat 462.3S5. SiAdL 4 SECTION 2. Pftrleiiona on tha at siihriivi^ Aooitcaimn^ i^ •uOdlwItMin applieaaont, aioopt lor mota that alraady hava raoalvad praliminaiy approval»d lor a tubdivition tppllcadon of a proparty govtniad by a saolarnant agraarnant bawi^ 5a CWat ol Long Laba and Orono. t»^ ^ graniad lor any purpota *at would ^ SiooMi^t wim *ia appileadont at of tha daw of adoption of tltit Ordinanoa and to any ---^----- of Orono mat tnall tw _______ - _______AtMM. ^Tha portion of tha aty of Orono OwTshan tww tiw raatnctiont of tf«t Ordbwnca It ai tha Iwtd containad wllhin tha araa datoribadaafoiiawt:leapaamnat: _ Ati proparttaa wlWn tha Cty of Orono Id wtWn 1.000 faat of tha Ordinaiy HighiOGWli WiMWi i 9WW% w ii»w wMbwr Marti of tfw tonewlng Mat: LahaKama OiekaytLaka Wottlald LaJia LongLaka rdLabaLMirdl Moonay . > HadltyLaba TanagarLaka Franco Ltka ForattLaka Lana Mnnaionka and atsooatad bays and An propartiat within tha City of Orono locawd within 300 foot or tha flood plain of tha following tribuianaa: Paintara Craak (Sactions 30. 3i TiiBN R23W1 *Stubbt Bay Craak* (Sactions 32. 33 T118N R23W and Sactiont 4. 5 T117N *^^^'^^tickay Laka Craak* (Sactions 27. 34 T118N R23W) ■WoltlaldfHoly Nama Crtak"{Sacoons 26.27.35T118N ffejW) * . Long LMa Craak (Sactions 34 35 T118N R23WWW Sactions 3,10 T117N R23W) •Foratt Laka Craak* (Sactiont 6.7 T17N ^’^^ECTION 4. Puration. This ordinanca shall ba affactiva for a parlod of ona yaar, uitiatt tiia City Council dawrminat that it IS no longar raquirad bacauta tfw raqUaiw sar^ hava baan oomplatad and adopwd ai^ mat appropriaia avaluatfon and action, Indi^g any nacassanr raviaiont of-ma Zoning Coda, hava baan nn^ad.:Tha durat^ of dytOrdinanoa may ba asiandad by aitoptiwi of a subaaquant ontinanoa. lor a total additional parlod of alghtsan montfia. ^ ^SECTION 5.3asi«M»..ThaOtyCounol may graid a varltnoa w ihi# Ordinanca if ma aty «wici lindt afiar eaialUl rawaw of aO M .facts that a proposal it not oonirary to ma ■ inttnt of tha Comprshantlva Plan, mat it it oompatiWa wim ma zoning and official oonvol amandmanta baing oontidartd by mtJ^iT* ttwi It prornowt tfw haaim. aalaiy, and walfara of tiw dtizant. and that a failura to grant a '/arianeo would craata a hardship for tha SECTION 0. ftuMjhllitv. Evary taction, provision, or part of mw Ordiramoa ts dadaradtaparabla from ovary omar taction, proviswn. or part and, if any taction, provision.« part maroof or action takan haraundar shall ba hold invalid, it shall not affaet any oihar taction.jxovlaion. or paa SWTir^CTION V FWaetiw Data. This Ordinanca is aftticsva upon adoption by ma Qiy Council.Adopwd by ma Oty Counci of tha City of Orono on tha 26m day of August 1991, by a vowofSayassndOnaya. : nATTESTDorothy M. Hsilln. Oty Ctark Barbara A, Patarson. Mayor STATE OFISNNESOTA) . ’ ) ts. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) Tha foragoing instrumant wastragoin. __ acknowladgad batara ma on this day August. 1991. by Barbara A. Patarton and Dorotiiy M. Hatfn. Mayor a City Clark of tha City of Orona a tiAtmaaoia mumopal corporwipn and said bismrmani was oaacuwd on bahall of ma CrY • Notary Public (PubHthod in Tha Lakar and Plonaar SspL 2. •19911 '' * » . a*'*w‘* « r;- ' Vr-s*-* 1 — ■■ 3^ J vJL LmS3 Li I 11 • I i J SEP 4 1991 Affidavit of Publication State cf Minnesota. County of Hennepin. Bill Holm, being duly sworn, on oath says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER. Mound. Min nesota. and has full knowledge of the tacts which are stated below: A.) The newspaper has complied with all the require ments constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02. 331A.07. and other applicable laws, as amended. B.) The printed.A which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and w^ printed and published once each week for______/ ________successive weeks: It was first published Monday. ^ the J^iay ol (iimpkp] 19I/. and was thereafter printed and published every Monday, to and including Monday. the day of 19_; I Authi rized Agent Subscribed and sworn to me on this ■3jd dav cijUiMhl —. Notary Public Rate Information (1) Lowaat clasalllod rala paid by commarcial usar* for compara- Ma tipaca: *10.40 par inch. (3) Maaknum ma atiowad by law lor abava maim: P«r men. (3) Rdt9 actuary chafQ®^ lot abovo nfiallan $5 48 p€f incite Each additional successive week: $3.66 par incfi }»-:■ /!■ . s*Srn.m - »■;¥>. /: ^ S Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator March 9, 1992 #1717 Lawrence W. & Arliss A. Gadbaw, 699 Minnetonka Highland Lane - Variance - Public Hearing District: LR-IB, Lakeshore residential, 1 acre minimum Pertinent Ordinance 1, Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 ” Hardcover variance required. i: -'iliH rfV'.;, I A&•' mAmMMM Review of Hardcover 0-75' setback area = 11,127 s.f. Existing hardcover = 8 s.f. or .07% No additional hardcover proposed in this area 75-250' setback area » 24,208 s.f. Allowed hardcover = 6,052 s.f. or 25% Existing hardcover = 7,144 s.f. or 29.51% Proposed hardcover per applicants survey « 7,750 s.f. or 32% Proposed hardcover per staff *= 7,794 s.f. or 32.1%* Total hardcover variance = 1,742 s.f. or 7.1% Additional hardcover proposed with current application = 650 s.f. or 2.6% Applicants hardcover facts show an increase of 606 s.f. Additional hardcover proposed on face of application is at 650 s.f. (560 s.f. garage addition, 90 s.f. additional blacktop). 250-500' setback area = 7,751 s.f. Allowed * 2,325.3 s.f. or 30% Existing « 596 s.f. or 7.69% No additional hardcover proposed within this area Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Lot coverage. Total area *» 43,086 s.f. or .99 acres Allowed structural coverage * 6,462.9 s.f. or 15% Proposed = 3,168 s.f. or 7.3% No variance required m. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Survey/Hardcover Inventory E-1-3 - Hardcover Fact Sheets P - Front Elevation G - Floor Plan H - Slope Detail w «/ , ■’< Zoning Pile #1717 March 9, 1992 Page 2 Description of Request (;•* ,; ; t ,'f .. ;• r ? ■ -'i t • . r - „i’ - ■ The applicant proposes a 20' x 28' portico/carport addition to southeast side of existing residence. The additional space will serve for storage of a boat and other items. Approximately 90 s.f. of additional paving is proposed along the north side of the structure expanding additional paved area. The improvement meets all required setbacks of the lakeshore residential district. The improvement does resulc in approximately 650 s.f. of additional hardcover in the 75-250* setback area where there already exists excessive amounts of hardcover found to be at 29.5%. Please note hardcover is proposed at an additional 650 s.f. and not 606 s.f. as shown in applicants hardcover facts. As a result of this improvement, hardcover in zone will be at 1,742 s.f. or 7.17%, over the allowed 25%. Review Exhibit D. Note topography adjacent to proposed addition, building permit must show how positive drainage is to be maintained. Based on 1' contours it would appear retaining walls will not be necessary. Structural coverage on this property that contains a little less than 1 acre is proposed at 7,3%. 5 .. ; • s' Bardship Statement m m ■Vmmmm Please review Exhibit A, applicants statment on application ^“^rm. Applicant notes the following; Existing 10% slope of driveway requires maintaining driveway area for accessibility of getting in and out. Review Exhibit H. Location of house on lot. Additional 2.6% increase is insignificant in consici*-'Ing the lesser amount of hardcover within the 250-500' '.atback area at 7.69%. The area within uhe 75-500' setback area is 31,959 s.f., total hardcover within the area is proposed at 8,390 s.f. or 26.2% (existing * 7,740 s.f. or 24.2%). .V Commission members may wish to consider existing paved area for backing out purposes when visiting site. If owners' cars were parked within garages, the 27' to 28' backout area from , y' \* garage could serve visitors. If paved area along northwest side 8 removed, vehicles will be forced to east side where elevations are steeper. There is no doubt that paving is excessive on the property and the paving improvements appear to be the only improvement that may be considered for removal. ii P&iliJ 1 T “ ■ seiAJM 1.^^ V ’V* . Zoning Pile #1717 March 9, 1992 Page 3 wm-• a Issues for Consideration m :■ Shall hardcover be maintained at a specific percentage or level on this property? Is 32,1 acceptable when existing was at 29.5? Are the hardships acceptable? j5j*nv''s|Would we create an unsafe condition by reducing hardcover along the west sides of the paved area? (Should a minimum of 90 s.f. of existing paved hardcover be removed to match the proposed 90 s.f. along the east side, maintaining a total hardcover increase of 2.3% with total hardcover at 31,8% within 75-250' setback area?) Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Isv far; j ► ;;'v r i • :• ,, ' '•• '• i. •'. -- *■ wm t ■*' . M mm S:in. m-.;^'V'l;•j-.as ■£i i / * ''. i'NV '. *■ ,' ■ mM m i:m :mjk.:rn m r • ..-v? "i ' ^rnmwmmf &■• - -m- * A ; i:>;.....:: •■: .-r r .mrV . . - '■'.v" ,’v l>:- ■ 'SisaW Oi\v •: ••/* -•r- m m Mia: mrkis iw m: d.A ’K; "-s:.B nil. hmimrnmmm m.. m-r:am-:mm i ■a*-, ••v^ •■V - . J ■•:•■> :mi k«' j4:i l.V r: .••••. •..•\ ^■^mSrnM m^i ';:r i® m m:WW^m fm T. % i? ^'v:-W mm: t^mmyif-.■»:■"•••-, P:. iN-.;: yrnmm!^ ■>:r ' ' tr . W- • ^ ■,7?vrw.^' CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATI Initial Application Fee $175.00 #1717 fter^ 0 0 -e- each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) CITY OF ORT^O FirmF OFFICE 13502000QO 01 CEH 175.00 CHECK TL 175.00 PROPERTY LOCATION 6Tte A^idress 6?^ !>hcAjuC7d^Jiul RECEIPT-THAHK YOU H235440 cool ROl I jiJ* 'i 0Z '19y ) Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) 0(^1 /7"* Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name (5. QtA<7>T ASSac- T/mG Address: _______ Phone (home) ___ Phone (work) 7 City: ^^aJ• Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)-------------------- /4‘ c# / CO /“k *f_I*' f iO. Phone (work) ““ ooCgfeName ( CfL)tJO) Address: 6*f9 City. Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (4|iW (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY _ Present Zoning District '■J Present Use of Property \Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 75bo DBscrlbe reouest in ^3o'xW ftOnco Aeo,r-o^ ro ■&& £>P Tb /U-Low t^oO- fboar AuO n-nUiA. -S-ToCAc f. A-oi avoiuC. 70 SOFT, pfr VARIANCES REOUIRED ±Lot Area Lot Width Setback Variances ( Other Front Hardcover Side __ _ _ Rear) • « ' • HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting ;from strict . ___•_________1 ^ .-rr/r ^/r\n£, iJ^a Vi*JL XJJc; LtUiiau^ iioj. vu v« w ^ ^ —^ —^ —------------------^ -----------------------— , enfprcement of zoning regulations £y/Sr<^A^ /Q% ofi P/2yc/tu//>y (2.&Quitt^S ^jmpinb TXUuthjt/A>i AlUEA piA. Accessfggrr<'/<>6 /vU toOT*_________________________ DESCRIPTION OP ONUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements \€vSTfK)C> cx>t^0t7Ki^5 a/: ^ lcrh fAe(M4rrS cg^^uAU^ f APP/mu/gc. At.4<t^/o rdJUAMC. /3 \JJZ4^ rM€ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS -S/nAci-cn- 7-<»f % caoeA^,^€^ ItJt ‘Zfy0'‘*^OO A4Le^. 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' {you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8Ji"xll" for rporoduction). 1 pgraphic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8J5"xll"). Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 6. 7. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above ^,nfomation has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OMHERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this applxcation and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ■I •T - i* i.v‘;-' I 1 ’*'^ - - » . *- -4 2 -» •nm^v m z a ; .go » / • ^. ...... * '• '■^ V- •- - " * ;?-ti'. ■■ • ’c; i < • » ... ■% .". f - • « O M O___V V OP *>4 C m m M f” j5 5 H '* S 5 J5 •» * Mmm ai 3 MM as*ii* 04 UV % ♦ • ■>. f m m a I fi fe' iia O O Z M •n ti m _-0 o z H z ni 5 X m z m </> H S3 13->m M zS3ii •< ^,v.-. « , " -I BKc:-V.’: >:£-'V-; .-:j^. oo N f. > , ..*■ -m i* » k''*- 'V ■ ^■1^' ■■ . wE - -a.' .-• V-vi.* -rf. •V ■••S'- v.^'*'' r V-V* s V * <« » o s ^5-5m m ~ “ i m HI a 3 M H C W M ^ O > X • o X z rs9 > rn 04 X U1 X > U1 M X iM «)III Xr 3S 5 r- ^ « o os s^ HI m ^X X o X nO •r- M H H SixxHI HI Hi HI-4 a Q M J ^ HI Vi HI HI Q > lit X ^ < X ^ in M IH Hi XX ^ o HI Z M ; 0 r-a ut O IH Xr f > <■" ^ ^ X Sr- r- Oi • HI HI HI in HI M M M In O > > a I in Z HI HI X M ^ r* r- m w > v>in < o o <H OfHi -n HI VI i*lSS”SSHI ^ X r- ti o • r- M HI r- 0^ 5i*^3HI HI X M X M H X M ^ ^ e ^ H 8J5m-| wornui X m ii^s m <_ S r* M 2 r-5S*S{g > «k ____X ^ • r- #-f -I 3 m |S r- Si . — m ^ S X X M •4 X 33 M ^ Mi"ls > HI ■• HS*"SS <D»?5 ^ ; A-. .«* * . t T- i? • '• • M 1 »i \D \ iattii jE'-'i..,. iLii .*:#‘r'^<*?^’ ' ' .ri ^9 9. >. P/4uao Ihi >HL4jt ^ C.oHSiil^^tf <*:•;« f .'^.- J -»*JT.'*' tlis;> - -..*»i/ . • f^-'r \ '■•■ I * k' •. ifer-Sl'';, I > kvSj:5 ’* %'\\'k < VWA'.Vj ■' kV- -i. \ HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS 0-75 in Zoom exist. Harctov«r Mit. Ferantagt Allavsbis 1U127 sq 0 sq. .07X C» 78 - 250 '■k PPopwty la Zona &i»t. Ku'doover Cxlat. Puoenta^a l*’’*T***J Me» HarOcovar Mw ParcHitaga AllMfaJbla 24.200 aq. ft. 7.144 aq. ft. 29.51X *06 aq. ft. 32X (1690 aq. ft. ovar) i r«* i. T 7^ -- s'' « o ^50 - 500 Ptoperty la Zons ^cist. Kirdoowr Exist, fmramtngm AIlcRmbls ^^ropom^d Nffv Hartkmsr 25* (6052 tq. ft.) 7#751 sq. ft. 596 aq. ft, 7.69* 50* 0 sq. ft. HARDCOVER CALCULATIOH WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE oNE^^^0-75^75“250^ 250-500 500-1000, Existing Hardcover in Zone . .—sIF. S.F. S • F • A fiOCH CH/tS G. Other S.F.- Total Hardcover in Zone »>> f M&i* Total Property Area in Zone /4/-Z7 S.F. S.F. 4 ■PU' ’i /-27__ X 100 -Cf, 0 7 i ■^1 g ••• f: )•- K cxrvai) mwi " - Mi *.' B • •M4« ••• w. ^ f-wr • • *M». • • A. ‘ House ..vacTvi C^K/^T oA^AU'' X'‘ «••* t »•• »•«’•• • HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ome) 0-75'CZ^250^ 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone LENGTH IO.*7 ‘ WIDTH /6 /o 3 coMc. CKfr, B. iJTtiltACt- _ UXtA:. Jin I vc^y » •I'•Z.Ctf x>w\/e D.. SlDEVMLK*^* 8ft>. R^\c,C.'A VICU^* fV\Tl* •__________ X ________ • h' *;■• {Louc U/AlXSa. - ^ % E. Patio/ Deck Z\h' ' f;I-andscape • r areas UNDERPIN -• • -yi • • •«♦.•. PLASTIC*"- SHEETING ••. «* ;•«9HV^ O.'HER ' ■ 'fe ■ v^pfer', ^ ' ‘ *' 1^ ;- r-p“^ ^ ^ • Total Hardcover in Zone Wm •Total Property Area in Zone 2€0 ^ s.F. • • S3C s.F. 72 s.F. /CO S.F. /iz S.F. 2C s.F. ? //s.F, = 3720 € = • /3 * »• • _ s.F. S.F. . C : ’ s.F. /7Z s.r. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. » % ,*■ »» •« * i • S.F. - S.F. ^7/^4 S.F. 2 4. -v-S.F. • ^T- \ a «• I. B 7/^4 ^B 24^102 X 100 2J. 5/ — CT,. GT"N». /J L^r' o. » • »r* •ris ^ . • • •• •*.»•• • - ♦••• f • *•' ilii . ir-ffliiifl ■ eVii 1^. 'I <li . r »• • * '• • #r» ■ ■ I " ' * ' « - ♦ f •• ••*. HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET __ __ ' " • SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE' ONE) 0-75^ 75“250i^ 250-500^5QQ-XQ00' Existing H5^rdcover in Zone . ... ^ ' /O - ^ -'} ALj*^y*^A^L,n. r * 'V'-'r* ^ -.A.' ‘ House LENGTH .« • ♦ • •••»•'» • ••4- s *** V ISi^ ;••.* . '..JI. :■ • ■' ■•'•■ E, -^sSi* i ry.’iM »• • *. B« *6arag £** V- * * I •* ir* •;:/E.*;v 0.. Sidewalk .-! * % • €. Patio / • D eck * ;' - i F.Landscape AREAS underlain BY '■ , PLASTIC------------- SHEETING • '* 1 » §¥* ‘B5- 'BouJO^rV' ‘ G. OTHeff-v, -/.s S.F. WIDTH S.F. S.F. S.F. V!-.r* __S.F. . L c. D riveway x _i . . . ■ ' .______________. X Sfo S.F. S.F, S.F, S.F.1 S.F. S.F. % ;• S.F. ..S.F S.F. •a$ ^ I S.F. . ^S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone S9^ Total Property Area in Zone "77s /B ‘t'mm ■I V • • ■: >3 .r* •S9'^ ' m «B 77S/X 100 71 (T? ^ ■ ■i:i m.T.. .’TTi ^ * *• K‘'4’k ■ • ^ 4. " E - - fc- '' -r . % -• ••« #t '■' 'E ■ I X-" \‘ f - s. wmife*-: = - V ':nxv : ■ ,:my^:Q ::t:mmxmiiitos,ie :«*;v:!®'scs'ssw vr". '.^ - .s m •' > f 3r* ' : rv’.’?.:' j :•4i 7m,T m W IPP^ ..jp-;.^'; .r'.Ay{>vv ’ M :^:k. Mii-y >,r» 2I'-0* 'A*-<r #1/4*—OT ^ f /J i;^ •^1- rn SB 'V-. '•WLFii* • mi ■■; Ft '-.V. ■ *' •'::^T - ^ ;P ^•; . • *i^-. ^ y ; vfe ‘: ^ ^ ='• -.V'r- t’: ■‘Si ,!*r ;",:t^s -v ,*• V. ■* V .. : -v^^^yi '^si- Mx- . f-'I‘rnsw ;f; - X i' • rl ej#'m mi m i2' ‘ ■■ ■; l' ^■m r. ••L%.;.v. I iilkMfIrtftiTfirtfg amty •. ^ ■•w ■K"' --i-tHEv- ^•• "r Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse» City Administrator Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager March 9, 1992 #1718 Davis Pansier, 4180 Bayside road - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-IA, Rural Residential, 5 acre minimum Pertinent Ordinance im mmi Section 2.7, Subdivision 5 (B). Front/street variance for the principal dwelling is required. ■ >j^- . '.jmmrnrn Required => 100* ^Proposed = 75* Variance * 25* or 25% r., • ■ ^idst of Bschibits A - Application B - Survey 6 Topographic Detail at 100* Setback C - Survey & Topographic Detail at 75* Setback ^ D - Walkout Floor Plan E - First Floor Plan F - Soil Testing, Septic System Design G - Property Owners List H - Plat Map V .nt Description of Request The applicant proposes to construct a new residence approximately 75* from the front lot line requiring a setback variance. If Planning Commission recalls, this is the lot to the immediate east of the Knapp property. Access is granted via Outlet D of the Knapp 3-unit PRD. The applicant requests a 25* front yard setback variance from the required 100' setback. The survey of this property indicates that a majority of this property is wetland area with the remainder being steeply sloping eastward towards the wetland. In 1990 a variance application was granted to Sam McCloud for a front setback variance at the very same setback. ^^ VS; 'j.. ^ ^ Ti Enclosed is a copy of soil testing and system design (Exhibit F) approved in 1990. This soil testing information was submitted for an 8-bedroom home and will be satisfactory for the applicant's 5-bedroom home. t/f ■ it..:'"-,. The home plans submitted by the applicant indicate a guest or non-rental apartment in the walkout level (Exhibit D). The homeowner will apply for a separate conditional use permit-for the non-rental apartment. te'^i Zoning Pile #1718 March 9, 1992 Page 2 Due to the steep sloping terrain, the applicant will be expected to file detailed grading and drainage plans wi"-h the building permit application. •=f •? Hardship Statement '1 Due to steeply sloping topography, the house has been placed at the edge of the ridge in order to minimize erosion and the major cutting into more steeper elevations. Severe slopes to the east and north required placement at the *:op of the ridge in order to minimize the impact on extre/me dense vegetation. ■JDS'J Isv W' - WV :v. r- - ■ ^ t •■='■;Vis' ' vuSJC : •" »£y:C , , VSv P Li'--:*r •">- :^v "1 ■ m/ 'ai ■Vv“ -/• ^ • :v-"- r-.;' V -, *,/•; • • ,•■ r-..' „ ■:i **•» / •'; % • * f«a.Jft •H| '■ 4- ‘.^V . mm■ : V,.' j-.■ V-- o J'tlrJi. '■I •■ ri'-'.'A'' ~IP * }. feSiSfeiflfe* . ...... r: ■ • . ^v< > - • ,i » J ; < • 1. V- imi. R' ■'■Kl ; -•- * >■■ < -^ V'*aS‘.v ■- - ' ' ;^-rV ■ fe'SS ^ ;'i . - Wy'" ; ’ ^■ f*< ^"VhI -.-* - -»^■^ TV. ' V,^■7^^; *, •. M >1^* ’jc- --■ -.. ." 'A \ CITY OP ORONO - VARIAHCB APPLICATION•"'ii ■/ i'>1 ■jmi- Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional varlanc Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) #i7ia ORDh’OL I m«*,i u nccrrc r U'l f Al/i- 175.00 EROPBRTY INFORMATION Site Address Mi 1350200000 01 GES CHECK TL 175.00 HECSIPT-THM YOU ii235730 COOl HOI TlH. Vi-/ oLoJ/ . Property Identlf. Number (P.I.D.) fl^' COdl Attach legal description tc application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) I (do)(do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: _ _residential _ _^other(specify) Zoning District;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ m APPLICANT Phone (home) ^ 7 O ~ /8 Name Uf>c £)f^n _ Phone (work) Address; \ cl cOa. ci City:LC)cL^^ kJ~^.Zip; / f-- ■ ■ ONNER (if different than applicant) Name i rn'^ 5^ I Phone (home) ) 7b>7 Phone (work) Address; S^6 4-^ ■ I iSi^r~ City; liJh _ _ _Zip;^S'^'^ j •’ i' u ^ DBSOaPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: V --r^: VARIANCES REQUIRED Ir'. - ^te----: _ _ Lot Area y Setback Lot Width Lot Coverage : Front Other (specify)_ _ Side Hardcover _ Rear _ Average Lakeshore m ■RARDSBIP/DESCRIFTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements; — C'—•- ^ :^ ‘ v'.' . W' (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of - »>»e .. following infor™*t:lon mast be submitted by the application date in order for yonr application to be considered complete; Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. _Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8*j"xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll'*). 6. _Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8*j'*xll'*). 7. ___As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application, 8. __^Additional Items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above Infomation has not been Inclnded. APPLICANT * S SIGNATURE I The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff ^i^^^time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct/to the best/of his/her knowledge. if.i'Applicant's Signature Date OmiBRS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. ijiiw;.; Owner's Signature Dare Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants mast be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Ccnission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 6 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ...... :r; ■■■■' . 'vv •: . '!» .- '^:i t--:* ^ Mmmm w A »*'^ ii?.;,..' ■• ■' Rights of subjects of DAT A PRIVACY ADVISORY"Hp.. ’ ' In accordance with M«S. 13.04f Subd. 2r —a—- -- - data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. ^ou are notified that: 1. The Information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that ^ the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license re<^ires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. • I'*’ ■ V '-i ' ■ "1 - '*5? ■S' i Y :: : .r,; m 1First y‘0 ^ >r^y\_ _ _ __ Middle" L aT o^ Last v>. f . City State Zip 5>* Phone I understand my rights as stated above.7 /ImmM ■i''liMRv-;;-r. mm mmJ m. ■>^ - .Jhv;"smm 1 : • ' V I, • • - • " :' r .V;'' J ’ . * - •T*\ ♦ . Uj MZ. Irfr "■^i- -.jaiRsJWsi; ■ I! •-Vi. *«Tll CQsfail: l"»30’ ii^.^ ■■ tf^ ' J ■ .V=-^ >« ;. - .- ' ■ ■ ' ' -t (fr*>j/ :»T : -. - ^ >=■:>' ■ • • ’" vvP • ■ ■. ■.■',;.'e,'.;>.K ,.5r*' V'i> :: v; M ■> (Tr<f. s) (9?t. Mm • ^ ■■■'..v:;i . >>v wm T*,!/ r.,. 'w^rwi-_s '.j-'.. t. .-i I ..■ - ■ V mm -: ■iM.M- su#a ■■ : Si '. i‘ “ • ? . ■ • * L.- V •■ ' •• . ■• ' K' ■ '' I, '"*• fk t!-, v->:': rrhArnl/^J v</l^h Wc5A ///le , C .' *f 4 f V •■ x-m t!». SCALE r=ioo' DATE 2-20-9Z B NO 92*^45 :«• • • ■ :■} //vsrr cofr ; ’ -i ••-■-> CITy OF OHOHO SSFTIC SYSTEM APPROVai.Pee $ Bo'bered By dP-^n ^0;^—--------------------- s/oXTW^dngf± iocanoH tai COHTRACTOR SSXnC COKTRACTOR □WKER^ PHONE: f-n:/ 2- ~ ^ -Q—= »o.e Pg?2-r? J.^'7" C“i^ A*L» M,WSire Cc^±<nf_^‘ fiAVvAP ; 75^. S' A-T ^ — -------------------— v> -^u(Kir.of^ eu^FFlPlve<^fO'^J ^ “"■j ' ^ ^ A 4 ^I advance.iisSS SfasSiEiS-I?'" Dai:e Appr ) V- ‘.-t j»^A ^. • - - -A.- - - - - P.-(fffi.a»ir' I iii-.*' -2j:«')'.i.'. ■■;' ■• ^•'l ?#So:^'MiB SYSTEM DESIGN FOR MLR CONSTRUCTION McCLOUD RESIDENCE in the SE 1/4 of SECTION 31-118-23 ORONO, MINNESOTA Bt;^: ’-* r 10-9-90 > * ■i< Additional information follows for the installation of a pr©ssure mound system. In addition to those requirements/ two septic tanks of 2000 gallon capacity each are recommended along with a 1000 gallon pumping tank. All construction traffic must be kept off both the primary and the alternate septic sites. Grading, must be done to divert (Tir- some small drainageways around the mound area and to keep other runoff water away. All construction and materials must adhere ' ^ to the provisions of the City of Orono. If any other information is needed, please contact me. riV-" fe.- Sincerely, PERCOR. INC " ^Mark S. Gronberg, if ied ■• . ■ •- V* •• :r' h m WIKtAja:pap*' KitaHBfe.L: ““S«mmm§vwmm iH ‘ a' :" ■ &A. !<"■ it43r4'\ : V .. W.l •7# <4 u^i- ’f’ :», ' .V-:Ife# ^•r, \ ^V' \ m w ,<r-'. '-3*. V \ 75- ¥ -?-n::. LA I % / \' / mA - • t' ■ ■"■ 1* i '■ ‘■ Al-A \ \ \ Cx''V'XX’'_A \ Vv\A W \ \\uA\\ \ Ai ,X>v' / \ ww X m \ k \ \ 1^- X, \ \ \ \ \ \ WW'WxW \. i^^Mm':m 'iL \ \ \ \ a \\\'Y iW'.''V' v;a \ \.\' V \ Wl * • II \\\\V\\ A \'‘ ■ ' M ' \ \ M \ ' '' ' A ' ‘i ' ■ L^.-------- I |v ■■r !? ' - ’(1 ^is.y E-2 Chan 5 minutes pev inch. The allowable percolacion races also depend upon the slope of Che original ground surface. A table of these relationships is presented on page E-8. It should be noted that mound construction be- gi.ns with Che 12-inch layer of clean sand upon which the rock is placed. The design material presented in section E of this Manual suggests a possible "cookbook" approach and is intended to deal primarily with mounds or "berms" for single family residences, or daily sewage flow rates of no more than 1,200 gallons. A flow of 1,200 gallor.s per day can be treated with a rock bed 10 feet wide by 100 feet long in a properly constructed mound or "berm." however, the proper hydraulic operation of a mound depends upon lateral as well as vertical seepage. I>fhile there is little doubt that rock-beds wider than 10 feet will operate satisfactorily on some soils as far as flow hydraulics is concerned, a careful analysis must be made of the ground slope and soil permeability underlying the clean sand xayer of the mound. A vertical separation of at least 3 feet is required between the bottom of the rock bed and any restricting layer in order to maintain aerobic condi tions in the clean sand under the rock layer. (\^men consolidated impermeable bedrock is present the vertical separation distance is 7 feet.) When aerobic conditions exist in the clean sand, the long-term acceptance rate will be 1.2 gallons per day per square foot. If the depth to the restricting layer is inadequate or the rock bed is too wide, anaerobic conditions may exist and cause a much slower acceptance rate. To evaluate the possibility cf anaerobic conditions and the subsequent hydraulic failure is the major design proolem when sizing mounds larger than those required fcr single family residences. Thus, the design criteria of section E cannot be simply multiplied by a scale factor and expected to properly treat larger flows. The hydraulics of lateral and vertical movement in the clean sand layer and the soil under the elevated rock bed must be carefully analyzed to ascertain that anaerobic conditions will not exist. Thus, both lateral and horizontal permeabilities of the.under lying soil layers must be utilized to analyze the flow regime to estimate the height of the saturated zone. Where heavy clay soils with slow permeabilities and high seasonal saturated conditions generally exist over an area, it is far better to utilize mounds for one or two single family residences than to collect the effluent from many residences than attempt to dispose and treat it at a single location. The flow hydraulics in clay soils will require either large depths of fill, or underdrainage, or both, in order to design a proper sewage treatment system to prevent anaerobic conditions under the rock layer. As an example, a mound designed to treat A50 gallons per day may function very well under certain clay soil conditions, while a single mound serving 5 or 10 residences will fail hydraulically if constructed according to the same vertical separation specifications. Proper construction practices for mounds are extremely important but when carefully followed will produce a sewage treatment system that will function effectively on a long-term basis. There arc an estimated 5,000 single fam y mounds successfully treating sewage in Minnesota. Many Minnesota counties have found that properly designed and constructed mounds or berms are an effective method of sewage treatment and accept them as a standard system. 'I rX: --■' - 4: vr <r Cc aUiJ ^ eT/^f^/i^C € MOUND. DESIGil PROCEDUTIE (For Flows up to 1200 gpd) E-19 <• • • A. Sewage Flow Rate See D-7 or 1-3, 4, or 5, or use metwred value; Flow Rate ■ /200 gpd /iAY, B. Septic Tank Liquid Volume (see C-3 or C-5) 2oaO gallons C. Soil Characteristics 1. Depth to restricting layer such as seasonally saturated soli, bedrock, coarse soil, etc. ; So inches 2. Depth of percolation tests; /S inches • > 3. Number of percolation test holes; ______Wholes 4. Ave. percolation rate; /_____rapi 5. Landslope » S* ~ ^ Z . Rock Layer Dimensions' “ ''' j*l. Multiply gpd by 0.83 to obtain required area of rock layer; /2:^:7 gpd X 0.83 »/^TrQsq ft ^ v» ■stm 2. Select width of rock la'"».x (10 feet or less) • Iq fee^ pi ^ 3. Length of rock layer ■ Area - Wid th t OiTO sq ft - iO it. ' ■ il>0 ft « S. Rock Volume 1. Multiply rork area by rock depth to get cubic feet of rock; ft x fi,7S ft - 7JVcu ft 2. Divide cu ft by 27 cu ft/cu yd to get cubic yards; S 3. Multiply cubic yards by 1.4 to get weignr cf rock in tons; 2.7. S cu yda x 1.4 » *9 tons F. Pressure Distribution System 1. Select number of perforated laterals ^ 2. Select perforation spacing " -? ft 3. Select perforated lateral length; Note if manifold is at end of rock layer, lateral length is rock layer length less half a perforation spacing. If manifold is in center of rock layer, lateral length is one-half rock layer length less half a perforation spacing. Perforated lateral length - (-/S.S ft. Divide lateral length by perfor ation spacing to get number of perforations per lateral 5^0 feet f S feet » /'7 perfs Note: last perforation must be in end cap, (see page E-14) 5. Multiply perforations per lateral by number of laterals to get total number of perforations; /7 perfs/lat x C lats « /^2. 6. Determine ’•equired flow race by multiplying number of perforations by flow per perforation (see page E-17) /^Z perfs X .7Vgpm/perf -/il5gpm 7\- Select minimum required lateral diameter from table on Page E-17; enter Cable with perforation spacing, perforation diameter, and number of perforations per lateral. Select minimum diameter for perforated lateral ■ / inches ^ G. Basal Width 1. Percolation rate in cop 12 inches of soil is 7. / mpi ^ USk M-?. -»'• •■ ■ ■. •.= ... 2. Select: allowable soil ^loading rcte from table on page E-16; 0*60 : . f 'y >•;' • ''■'J r**- ' •' -• _,' - • • c V ■iSf^' '• n, ■••e' E-20 MOUND DESTGN PROCEDURE (ConClnued) (For Flows up to 1200 gpd) hi.' ‘fe.-;- >• ' ftiili p ♦ • -fT. > ^\av- ^•,!r •K -'x iM Calculate basal width ratio by dividing rock layer loading rate of 1.20 gpd/ft^ by allowable soil loading rate; 1.20 gpd/fc2 «^,^pd/ft2 - Z Check this value on page E-16. isii 4, Multiply basal width ratio by rock layer width to get required basal width; Z‘0 /O ft 20 ft H. Dovnslope Dike Width ■‘I 1. If landslope is 3% or more, subtract rock layer width from basal width to obtain minimum downslope dike toe width 20 fc - /a tt • /o ft y-H-2.1 ,’ulculate mound height at edge ~i6f rock layer on downslope side; a. Determine depth of clean sand fill at upslope edge of rock ^ ir /er: A ^ feet v<r--.if V.-- Multiply rock layer width by landslope to determine drop in elevation; /c? X o % - 100 - 5 f t Add drop in elevation to depth of clean sand at upslope edge of rock layer to get depth of clean sand at downslope edge i of reck layer. , O* i ft + /.Qft • /# O f t d. Add depth of clean sand at down- slope edge to depth of rock layer to depth of soil backfill to get mound height at downslope edge of rock layer; /.6 ft +d?.'75ft +/.2Sft « 7. ^ft •r rn Enter table on page E-18 with landslope and downslope dike ratio. Select dike multiplier of S'. 26 . H.2.f. Multiply dike multiplier by downslope mound height to get downslope dike width; 5:2^ «/7. ?ft 8 Compare the .values of step H.l and step H.2.f. Select the greater of the two values as the downslope dike width; 9 feet h. Calculate upslope dike width using upslope mound height ; and upslope dike multiplier i> y f, i. ToCal mound width is cho sum of upslope dike width plus rock layer width plus downslope dike wid th; y.7ft + /o ft +//9fc 3. If landslope is 2.9 percent or less, basal width includes both the upslope and downslope dike widths. a. Calculate doxnislope dike width using steps H.2..a. through H.2.f; feet b. Calculate upslope dike widtl using upslope mound height ; diki multiplier from Page E7I8; X ft - ft miMm Add downslope dike width to upslope dike width to rock layer, width to get total mound wid th; ft + ft + ft ft * X d. Compare total mound width to required -basal width from step G-4. If total mound width is greater than required basal width, use calculated dike widths. If required basal width is greater than total mound width, Incroasc downslopo dike width. t .. I IhAin-r'ft f’ •. ‘ ■ < 'i-. • .r> i :%■ ^ ' : .... • • ■ ■ ■■• • .,-= ■ ■■ - ■■ ■ f f'j-* ^ ^ /f* 6*r//)^/y c E ^ O/'Oi2/'>^ C F-15 / K V' .' • ■ • • ••as. PUMP SELECTION PROCEDURE A. Deceralne pump capacity: lamm<••»■• ■• ■ ?.v,,vV' if^-’ f. • u ^' V.- ■ •' • . •-•• -#'.-' j wv ^^•^^.^c.:- 1. Mlnlmiin suggested is 600 gallons per hour (10 gpm) - to stay ahead of water use rate 2. Maximum suggested for delivery to a drop box of a home system is 2700 gallons per hour (<5 gpra) to prevent buildup of pressure in drop box • Use value from design of pressure distribution system3. Efcap«;. „ , Wm SELECTED PUMP CAPACITY • • •gpm v-^w U '-Vf' I . 2. .7' ^ ’' ■* - tu^yyyyy 11 , * V*'*' ' '•'• ' '■ At‘v . ■.: Determine head requirements: \l ^ E'evation differ nee between pump and point of discharge If pumping to a pressure distribution system, add 5 feet for pressure required at manifold ....................................... Friction loss a. Enter friction loss table with gpm and pipe diameter. 3. iw -^v ■• '• 2..; ' ' ir :.^.- ‘■2. S'>,' "i' Read friction loss in feet per 100 feet from page F-18. L. - Se ft/100 ft b. Determine total pipe length from pump to discharge point. Add 25 percent to pipe length for fitting loss, or use a fitting loss chart. Equivalent pipe length » 1. 25 times pipe length *1.25 x /0 O ■ _____ c. Calculate total friction loss by multiplying friction loss In ft/iOO ft by equivalent pine length. Total friction loss - ^.Sd / /2S » __ /Z5 feet 7 .feet jcil- c. Total head required is the sum of elevation difference, special head requirements, and total friction loss. 3*+ -T * /a.1 • •• • 'tm-iMA D. iy-m TOTAL HEAD Pump selection 1. A pump must be selected to deliver at least yS. S • •y feet with at least 7 feet of total head. gpm m To maximize pump life select sump size for 4 to 5 pump operations per day. CalcuLatc drainback .«• I , . - -X''. 1. Determine tot.al pipe length, _ _/^ feet. 2. Determine liquid volume of pipe, /7. ^2 gallons per 100 feet. (See page p-18) Multiply length by volume: Drainback quantity ■ ^^O feet x / 7» */3 gallons/lOO ft • /7 ^3 gallons Suggested drainback quantity is 10 percent of pumped quantity. A larger drainback percentage will decrease pump station efficiency slightly but pumping energy costs are usually a relatively small part of the total household energy costs. . ,*: • ■ *lli ••V n i--3’ M 'r * ' ' t . ^ 't > • ■ • •#• ♦ POMP STATION REQOIHEMENTS isr DIFFERENCE (J-1 minus J-2) MANIFOLD DISCHARGE ELEVATION ELEVATION AT POMP FT J-1 J-2 I S FT (ELEV. HEAD)(v) DISCHARGE LINE LENGTH (POMP-TC-MANIFOLD) I^ DISCHARGE L£tlB‘‘=af^ ± 2- tvo\ meter (BETWEEN POMP ( 1.5" of 2" typ\)AND MANIFOLD)Z- INCH “i fCi •': ‘ ■ u FRICTION LOSS PER 100 FT OF PIPE: (FRICTION LOSS IN FT/100 FT, PVC): BR’S GPM 1.5" PVC 2" ?VC ****** ********** 3 26.6 4.21 1.25 3-i-10% 28.8 4.87 1.44 A)CZ^ zi.ir^2^8.01 '2.37 • • ^ * 4+10% 40.0 8.91 2.64 5 44.4 10.81 3.20 ; 5+10% 53.3 —4.50 , p^/4 FT/100 FT @ 1.25 x@x@/ 100 * HEAD LOSS DDE TO PIPE FRICTION :4^: : - 1.25 X loo X g.r / 100 = rtoi {ft 0 ADD 5.0 FT BY DEFINITION FOR LOSSES IN LA'r ^lALS/MANIFOLD TOTAL HEAD REQOIREMENT = 5.0 0 + 0 5-0 + ^ + 10 “ ^^*^^FT"HEajD REC2 ■■ ******** MINIMUM REQUIRED POMP RATING . . ■ .t .• ; >■ ' t ^ GPM AT ******** FT TOTAL HEAD ******** A A ■ SIDE 2 ■►• ■: .■• ;•. f*. • >■ - ?■ ^ • - r . ■1 ' ' ’, ■’■' : :■ * wT-^s !f^~ ' -■^‘tk-- I m «* «^iriny of Pump Station . Betermine Surface Area Rectangle = Area = L x W X____SB______square feet Widtli I Length 1 Cirde * Area = ic x (Radius)* 3.14X____x_____=_____squarefeet Oth^ = Get Surface Area from Manufacturer luarefeet ^ P“ therefore you m,^t m^tiply the conversiort factor and divide by 12 inches per foot to calculate gallons per inch Area X 8.34-*• 12 X 834+12 a_____gaUons/inch 3 Calculate Gallons to Cover Pump (with 2 inches of water covering pump) (Height (in) + 2 inches) x gallons/inch (_____+_____)x_____»_____gallons ____ 4. Calculate Total Pumpout Volume (Section D on page f-15) ______gallons Calculate Volume for Alarm (typically 2 3 inches) Deoth (in) x gallons/inch * X_____=*_____gallons ^ - ti,: Cdcilate Reserve Capadty (75% the daily floiv) pally flow (see page D-7) x .75 « ^____x.75*.^_____gallons Resale Capacity Aiann if Pump On PompOff . Pump Height§i rij •vi To ai PumtJOttt \blumc 7, Calculate total gallons gallons over pump + gallons pumpout +gallons aiarm + gauo 1+4+5+6 + ____4‘_____+_____»___^.gallons ns reserve s.Total Depth (Total gallon divided by gallon per indi) Total Gallon+ gallon/inch ^ m inches Boat Separation Distance (equal total pumpout volume) Total pumpout voluIne^ gallons/inch * =3 inches 'V. , ’ >•,» '.'’tj* ,; t.'.- . • - - * * ’ ■ J , , '.*>V Locaclon .or Projp.cc of Soil Borinr.s '/l C L/3 u.€l i ■; ftrtHi'': •*Dace 7 —‘ / 2 *" y 1;^ ; Dorinps made by /? ^ ^ }) £R . Classification System: AASHO _ _ _; USDA-SCS —J Unified - - - -; other used (check two): Hand or Power ; Flipht _ _, or Bucket a : oth: r I s* . ^ V^;. Depth, •. .. •■ -tr. ; in feet -m-- ■'•'A-/6 — 7 — ' :<■- 8 - f. Dorinr, numher;; Surface elevation SdACK COAr\ AAf, SAOCt^ C.Ci*t c6Afv\ ., . " r . : ■*'' -ylu^ ’ • - ' V' • \ " •r>V- i,v-’ • v'f •vV* • • r^' r. ■’••••- ■>•{; f ■ • .• ■ '. ■. .V J ' •'*’ >■ . ‘ /y^i' ■ :»•, .?■. m^-m.End of borinp at 0 feet. ' ^ .I, ■sid',A’K Standing water cable: Present at _ _ _ _ feet of depth, i; hours after borinp I: •' '=r’' _ Hot present In boring hole € • ‘ ’’ Mottled soil: , Observed at 3. ^ . feet of depth. ’ Hot present in boring hole- - - -- Observations and comments:^ I .A' —. .. Depth, in feet Borina number Surface elevation I 3 — U BI jc ^ SA*>'aY L6A/^ BA 6Ct^^ C.O/ A^ End of borinp at 3^ S feet. A Standing water table: . Present at _ _ _ _ feet of-depth, _ _ _ _ _ __ hours after boring. Not present In-boring hole Mottled soil: Observed at ^^ . feet of depth. Hoc present in boring hole Observations and cemmonto: ■f ■ il • • ••• • * *« * - a-..Jr. t V •* ;• '.':‘-^ f- %'v .. * V Lop.s of Sol?. Dorlnrs ;V . Locnclon .or Pro|ect L^ Oj /2. n-io ’ Borinfts made by ^ (^P^ - - - - - - - • Classiflcacion SvsceniJ AASHO I USDA-SCS * Unified y.‘Au;ter used (check cwo): Hand ^ , or Power V • ^ .V, Depth, Date 7-/2 - 9^ ; ocher ; Fliphe Borinp, number: Surface elcvacion «<?y#Av GfiCU/'/j Cl^r 4^/1 Ai if;:: v ’r;, „• . ' ’ ' ‘■■1 ■' . f V''■: ■> • • .;5% c; •'.‘t ■ >% End of boring ac *7^-0 fccc. <_.• Scandlng water cable: IVesenc at _______ feet of depth, *- hours after boring. Hoc prcsenc in boring hole ^ Moccied soil: '4*.. Observed ac J*. ^ face of depth, • .’ Hoc present in boring, hole f;!?' ’ Obsccvattons and coimcnts: : b^-. If. t-mmmi W- , or Bucket : ocher Depth, in feet n —- K.:;iiv;* r .;n \f. y -vr End of boring aC feet. Standing water table: . Present at _ __ feet’of-depth, hours after boring; Not prcsenc In boring hole Moccied soil: Observed at _£ceC oC depth. Hoc present In boring hole Observocions and comments: V* --I ' >v ' :t 4-.. ,v-. -■'■■'#«i,i r.'-, i • X.: ^^:7r7ry —j *%. ' •• • ' •-‘^; ir\-: ’^P PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET Percolation test readings made by—f) Q£J.—Ji ^fP, Ci 7> ;3"9T) iJtUCt starting at A Test hole location —C L '/ }Q-„ Hole number , /_______ Date hole was prepared 7t/-\—f ^ Depth of hole bottom / inches, Diamt cr of hole ----------------inches ■•U., Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches .. Soil texture m'a-T r-n :rf-'J96AC/C /aAi^ t j rjA^gy laj/vt /I-r.T/cry Method of scratching sidewall.A?aTA /f ^ Depth of gravel in bottom of hole.'X Date and hour of initial water finmo7"*/2 **v /) Depth of initial water filling------UK.----inches above hole bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours —f? ii Ej.— ■■vMXy.,.............. ••■- . "•..■'t**’ ■ ■ ' ••• •••■•': f' n \- ‘ ■'.>; -■.» V J ’ -. . -V - ■rr '•.x;-Vv.;^- H- ' - PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET 4 '■!-'■'S'- Percolation test readings made by Test bole location _ D/)Ai P/) A/J) f: f Depth of hole bottom.y •r' _________ , Hole number- inches, Diameter of hole ------^-------inches -7-n-^ 0 (tiutei P starting at /, •s , Date hole was prcpi-mcL-,7^;p- Soil data from test hole: i ■ ; ; -.<" c' *fi-\ »v*:> \ i \ Depth, inches Soil texture r V ■SOiCfc iaj/r\ 'lx Pj/jU’/jy /L-/S ■K /^Afao^/u ■M' L'lc^v' Method of scratching sidewall __ Depth of gravel in bottom of hole Sc A L inches 4‘,20P,h> - Date and hour of initial water filling 7“*^ Depth of initial water filling. i S? Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours —J^.K—1 L-L.—Zs inches above hole bottom -'ii „ Maximum water depth above hole bottom during test IK' Wi, i'* : ‘ ■'*1^ p«# Time Time interval, minutes Measurement, inches Drop in water level, inches Percolation rate, minutes per inch Remarks i •f!c-F'U fft/i •/./■P.___ /..?/0 2 t'N ho n • •i1^ G Ft L L 2^0 it i •94^ - r¥/L ^S' \1 > ? oo / / M L 9r / • ^.20 •tryf----------...—t-j.. i/7..$-____, ( —^----1 —r-------------------------------/ «p. ♦ • • >-.1. percolation rale «__-------------minutes per inch...•T II illlliilliiiiliii III mil Jim «. •• •• • ^. - ■ \:v m M'Mt •i Mr • VA-, PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET • •• • • ♦ -? / 1 Percolation test readings made by,,. •/?. h -----o n ^.3^^ 9 ^.. .starting at __ ^ i _____________ j number.———^-——-. Date hole was prepared ^ inches, Diameter of hole------^------inches ^- rv ^ Test bole location_1. d V ^ 9 gp-Depth of hole bottom—JL^ {Soil data from test bole: « "•ii> Depth, inches Soil texture 'i. /iZACt . " ’V ■^A mm %~. ■V -i'' ZffiZ ZUa y Z Z)J rW • •• Method of scratching sidewall__SC /? /^'T'ch..M-IL .^ Depth of gravel in bottom of hole------2za ----ucpm oi gruvci m oauom ui auic_——s—i------- i $2 S r, I I Ddtc and hour of initial water ?) , Depth of initial water fillin g , /,3 ». ■„ ,.inches above Iiolc bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 liours —^ ^ ^ L L*‘--------------- 7 V7_________________ Maximum water depth above hole bottom during test----Z /-^ s. r , • J '■■M -■•■ 'i'' V''' Time 'i: 1331 \ -r Lia -130 JL2JLz,so..23 Time interval, minutes GM) hJ I \ ♦ I Measurement, inches <9 fr - /1 11 t \ \ I 9 %- 13 IS u Drop in water level, inches '-1 'hU i V:■4- ■? yrk. Percolation rate, minutes per inch Remarks m ':cvi F,'L i 'Th ti — / / c r'^-:a 33T EJ3 Rr.p] LL I I v'J I / Pc "‘olation rate » ^ .-minutes per inch. Pivmi S : . n '•■ fc.* ^ ' ■’ .: ^ %i^'J •' :^ '- ■ / ■^,1. V ... - ^1, /■■ ^: ‘ ir- '■ ‘k‘ • S.vf^PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET MM w Percolation test readings made by. [?^lSl ^ (zz-------on ..^.^starting at — Test hole local ioa /ui a.m. p.m ,u i I /5 tj Depth of hole bottom—/ n_______________ Hole number. inches. Diameter of hole---------— 7 .inches ______ Date hole was prepared __7 **./ 2 ~* ^^ Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches Soil texture -.rw'0- ? r-n ry^^r / ^a/w /1-/S <qy,v\ Method of scratching sidewall ---S C ^ fiSfc- Depth of gravel in bottom of hol<----inches^ Date and hour of initial water filling]jZr/2L:i.^, Depth of Initial water filling -----L3------inches above hole bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours.j?j=/=,'!- I. ., Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tcsi 7%,incl.\ Time Time interval, minutes I.2H f'LJI. AJIS. SS’ 7 ?g Measurement,•- . inches 2OM! At 9 \ I • / ^/ I Drop in water level, inches Percolation rate, minutes per inch ‘S Remarks I^rTpli f T"4 >0 ^ li Lo tIQ^lUi IT .<• % MM < H <- J'.JA -L-LA ^>^Fi) L / I Percolation rate » ,‘fi 32x —minutes per inch -•■ ,v •*“ ;. : 1- - -v-'V ■ :?■ -V ■ >>. r V • ' • * • * .rr ^ ^ yr^' r ‘ ! >.v • » I ..♦?■' PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET RPw" ! Percolation test readings made hy../^.£/il —h ^ ^ —o n - ^ Test hole location hfL P'J\ D----------------------- Hole number — * (Jatrl starting aL / V ^ , Date hole was prepared _’D.H.JZ n.^ d Depth of hole bottom » Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches Jnches, Diameter of hole---------------inches ,./S '•'Si':- ;r,;. Soil texture "V.X ZaA/^ 'sfr •' «' ; Method of scratching sidewall —Sc,/^, ^ / C J’}. Iz L-. O Depth of gravel in bottom of hole——-----inches,^S,3dp,M.'■ '-h Date and hour of initial wnn-r fillin g 7-/*? Depth of initial water filling-----iL-i------inches above hole bottom J?'T‘ ^ )Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours—■•V *** ■*' ***—— - j -y // I , Maximum water depth above hole bottom during test-----lXJ2.—inchV„.>^ r rjtv.- .-V . ♦ • ■'• : - V ,oa-2rAlr£2 f^ri PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET Pcrcolation icsi readings made by. f) O^J h frP. fs“.----- Test hole lortitinn /yr L* K)---------------------- Hole number. Depth of hole bottom__Z3Z__Jnches, Diameter of hole---------------inches His Soil data from test hole: starling XiP7 Cs._____ Date hole was prepared_*? "“ / ^ 0 Depth, inches •V. Soil texture ■ C? - /2 V ir.'CdA/^ m--'/?. -/-T tOAr^■ii : , tr. Method of scratching sidewall S. C. j (H G" K.# Depth of gravel in bottom of hole.inche:es 0 r.M- ^Pm^ate and hour of initial waf<»r filtino p / 7 “ Depth of initial water filling^-----LJl. *yX. jnches above hole bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours B Fl-x •7 Maximum water depth above hole bottom during test—^ / .J ..incl' ■,i#W mm isili^i» ■ Bi '■*H»Aaa m aiMS »jBB»||lBpi^ff~ -;:■ A: .iS: --i- ^R:-;’;<Mai^m&m e1 mm ^p' ^'-n' jJ: t > 1v ^ ^ '0 (f'^)^1-*; Vi/Vc/ •€.' . ,;6 Y;’v w'V ■« •••' •< ->•' *Y?i 'i. : '1- %. ' y- W B"'- ..vasK/^Y-'V’''Y / r.v«isv’- - «V.' ■' .*' ; Y:Y Y' t\ .. f "w - . '.;■ -;. V ‘'’•/' ' * " V */• t' •■:•■•• ■ '.rf%',•!•• '..v .r' •* ^•v‘-' • • •‘•' ’b' 1 ^ .)J Y.-; >. Y ' :>--”-A./ . •*. ilip -7 Y •- ■ v/.'V^ ■:% wm A G» ■ # rV . .» 'I: ¥:• \- • • r. • •...•■ • .‘- ■» >.<', f. P«Sifv- . .S-,.x*,j| m •.’" -:. :'' ■■'j ■ ; . -/ ^!,' ■'. Vjtj- jyfe? ,mm 4-KV'-' %?■* ‘ .'•V'c ‘. Y. 53 wm- ■ml ■m- irs. mi m V • ‘ ' '■^*> .‘-^*T'\-(<' ' V«t i ' •*>5as ■ * - XiI* vS^' • »l^ - ' ■T . \ .V '• ''■ iA ./■ ..'r* .V • ! ■M. . KJ y =?a5 ■>r'Y ' ■ ■:■ i/: V ■X .' ;..v : V C' *■ ■,.> .f • ‘ %, .Y'*' \ -;V- mil '. ....................,1 ' ^. • V : '*'• ’ Y : :• : ;/- . ■ ■ " • '■" -■*•••■• r 4.1 ■ . v*j/ ■■■rt ':^K iVVj !*: I ,v ';;:i:, \\- ■>. • S; * .t’- ' ' ■•f.-'ll .'t] i.< r- -' ;v £;• J ! - . -. • '>k. a .•■ •" W>v,f.-Vk.. ■''.•■•• Mfi- ,'Wy til.' ¥0$^WL V;' m < Al . mmm: mill mrnm :'ii m m *^0 m PI m imm m M 1 iw ii r ■ ■ ■ ' ."■ ■;-V^^ Sql> ject: .. • • .■.■• , #>.'•<-■'V- “J^ T -'-Xil, ■ ,^jV' . i Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse# City Administrator . 'Jt^ Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager March 9r 1992 #1719 Henry Brantingham, 3185 County Road 6 Public Hearing Variance - Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.28r Subdivision 5 (B). variance is required. A rear lot line setback W'Required ■ 50* Existing = 44.6* Proposed * 40* Variance =® 10* or 20% R.' -r? ’ _ * ■•'■; r^?Srv' List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Survey C - Remodel Plan D - Property Owners List E - Plat Map P - Septic Inventory Map G - Existing Floor Plan '1^. 'X ^m •V Description of Request .n .> i Y ■ I v;t- The applicant proposes an addition to the principal structure to the east and southr encroaching further into the required rear setback. The existing structure is currently 44.6* from the rear lot line and the proposed addition would bring this home approximately 40' from the lot line (Exhibit B). The proposed addition will extend the house foundation over an existing well pit. This well should be properly abandoned and inspected by the Minnesota Department of Healthr if it hasn't been already, before construction begins. The well currently used for this dwelling is approximately 15' west of the well pit. The existing septic system consists of two 650 gal. concrete block tanks, one 500 gal. precast concrete pumping chamber, and 1,320 s.f. of drainfield. The pumping chamber and new drainfield were added in 1983 with no septic problems noted since. The proposed expansion will not impact the septic system./ ^'V- . ■ • 'f -r ..0' Wk'-r "" J V.*: i -.**•••• V-. •J r, '■-i ' *«. '.-4^ J- • V ‘I 'v. A .i'v- " > Av - ' ■rr. . h .1 ■ -I::: rT-r'*,-i v‘•: -■~v -- - ■^. - ;s>' Zoning Pile #1719 March B, 1992 Page 2 '■'W':-7%>.-WfcV < A.":-,. f Review of Hardships Please review Exhibit A.The applicant's information indicates that the existing house does not meet the required 50' rear lot line setback and no other add on space is available for this structure. '■.Kyki Staff would add the following comments: Expansion is limited to the north by the septic system and limited to the east and west by mature vegetation. The existing water supply well limits expansion to the west also. ... - -■•V ‘ T. . • •*C ' ; f-V.: 'T -V'-f ' •. '/ •> v: T.< 6*‘ V»v- ■■ ■ t -*1. ..—few m ■ ■'■ u ..V .isf —■ .•A/ - • r T * '.'It‘ ‘' •■:. ry.p-r¥my^f^' ■ ^^1“' • * h,: ••:s { . v;..# 'V•-» • w: •V '.-I'T "r w’wm .«■»" f •* t •• ■••■' . » ■• •'•• • .•■'■ • ,'f‘ V ,, r ■:■■'. Uk ‘ .' I.'1' ■ 'J** f • '.^' -■'5 ' •■.s’. : '■•■}“ .fg ■'nurwiAis ;..v ■■...• ,:7 .'V ’ N'' • • .-a«K.4fei jii > »' • ;s. }c. '• ■% •, •.il..“- V ’ ' ■ • ' '■ '> - ■ ■. ■. ■.V- ■ ■.•/ -is...: “« f *.s' 1 1 •:r s^*; . ,t--; r% ::-\vyt ■■ t-’ F'^v.tV' ■ i-;. s 1 '-..y r' -•■ 'r'- ■^y''y^'':=k’4 V:A,' / -rr., ’ > 1 . 4.' 4. ■ -"•a; fe&i^4S:ai .';f ---------------------------------■^'-: ;,..■ ''y. <>•' • ■■••■»■■ ■• “ '■''^*‘ ^■■.■‘ '*■' il4 “I - • *< .7V ' ? .'V- mm^^,. v-» .If*d^/nn A CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Pact Fees (Double application fee) #1719 PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address ORmO fmnce office 135020Q000 ^ 01 CEH 175,00 ^ CHECK R 175.00 RECEIPT-THM YOU ft23S560 cool ROl 709:1 02/21/9 Property Identif • Number (P.I.D.) 2*^- 1 Attach legal description to application if not included on required^urvey. ^ Date Pi^rrty *&S (month/year) I (dcrTTdo Present use of property; ^ residential _ _ _other (specify) Zoning District:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ /4s Phone (home) ! <2.An> ItrtoGiil^AM Phone (work) Address; City;= d ^ OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address:City: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: Estimated Construction Cost _ Jr-Ar^oidno^ f hsrtTi^J^i^d^ Zip: 4 ■i• MjHKi * ' * VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ■ A'SI X Setback: Lot Width ___ Hardcover ___Lot Coverage Front V Side x Rear Average Lakeshore •v®*c ----- Other (specify) m >t'! HARDSHIPA^ESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property ipliance with Zoning Coda requiiconditions preventing compliance with Zonii^ Coda requirements: w Alldt < H ,i \ •’ IfvtJz? liYA> t/A I'i I \c. O U r-" . '"..vv. ■ ww«; (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application date order for your application to be considered complete; Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within ISO* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center • 348-3271). 3. X Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. X Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy S^^xll" for I reproduction). 5. wAropographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8Ji"xll"). 6. y Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%’'xll’*). 7. N/jVAs an addendum to this application^ please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. _Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application.. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if '^che above info:tion has not been included. - r t: APPLICANT'S SIGTkTJRE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administratorr agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses Incurred in review of this applicatlonr and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best pf j?ls/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date ; amasRS signature H?The owner hereby ackowledges and a^Se^^to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staffr consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification pf Owner's Signature Date t.-,* Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Plaijnlng Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Ap^loants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning cbnassion and Connell. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. t' m •r- •.-V >Stl ffiliilitlMVfAfrtlf'f 'i .rt IS ■'j ■; '* f^'-.r^-~^ :—'r ■ T • n: M .Ifr. V '.; ............ ■J -i ^ •H •»** :• -•.7 fl ^^= ■ IWII l^^^■^t .;.Vr L*V*-. '^-■. ‘ ■ J-V;-' , \t^.-) DATA PRIVACY ADVI SPRY :'j-v yf^ S ■ In accordance with M.S. 13.04, 4bd. 2, -Rights data", we would like to inform you tiiat your request for a permit or Itctn'se from the City of Orono or any of ^ you to furnish certain private or confidential information. .•V -You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. '« f __ _license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve# some information may become public. r-*4^ LvV'*; 5. You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. *'•1vWTv,.aj=u *c . sii- ‘ •"n-.? -T ' 4.; ^ ■ ' ■LV V4v"-- “Middle Last > ‘4: ■'4 4JM O City jUr^State 3 i'V Ph </y/^ idne I understand my rights as stated above. ■ t»..'1= I ■ K-, 'i ^v#,..... :-<rvv-‘........................... mmm 4: 'V. 5^m-• '• r*' w-y *«. ' '■ Mm^m_ _ _ jV^i* - « V!»•: IV HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSH SETBACK ZONE! (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' Existing Hardcover in Zone 3 X frni} 75-250' 250-500 '(^0-100^^ '"V 'I Js A. H ouse •/. • V. > . LENGTH /? ■ K., r. ‘ ■ ■•• •■ ' ’•,. j;* ' '' :,V. •/', S.V'i ■♦‘'jV't* ,‘v l5 B. Garage 2^2^3iO '• D riveway i,'- V■‘'?*, i M.M) D. Sidewalk { - . 'r.f. €, Patio/6«t«iJO . tco p.Landscape AREAS underukin plastic ’ SHEETING X__ Other i*}»l • .'*A-*;v . S.F, S.F S.F. S.F. S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. .'I.' »■ •f. ... V/ ; .v ' 2. '•/,y'*' ';K-- t ' . i-'1-.-5 . j-.-i*’ ■V- '• ■'■I- : *'■ - . % * ■• ■■ -r4%-' ■' •vJS?..";:..- TV':' ■ rv ' Total H ardcover in Zone Total Prop iRiV A rea in Zone - ^ s. S.F.S V B •V. V^.V'f ■7. :■> ■• r‘ r-? ' ■■ ■;■■ (A i: ’iji, . B nl jTIOO -.-5£L_% * f-. . -if \SSH *' * * ♦* . B;'-mm ^.2. : V-:^2^V'^yf?ry^ V' V PiftS^ ^x-ir tiJ •,J -.j ^ ‘'"V:Ji*a.\., _ V- ♦ '•“■*■ “*•;.■ :.-A?< ' ■ ;• ' * ■ * * • •. . ' Ik *t • y\‘- i'lr'w 'i . . 4 • fir:-'}y~-.-'!\ > :’% •.'i Ity :■--'mmm. l'’Vv.?-|ite^^v: ■:'>Wi I -y \L*> . ', ^: •■ :':V; ■; fv.r. mm •D O ^ H » m X m 39 m (/> H m M Mu -I' - .'^.v.;'''^ ^1 u ''K \ „■, 'vu^wovwwrAm• '‘7- ■ - ■ '• i #■ ;r'i:s us^mmmmm w>y'^ mU-mmm W: V-- !S?^'"':-' •• -; ;• rl^\ -. ■ • \ 'k ( V J ;' Wk\ % UU;-U,4 > ■ iWsSSmy$m irm I tesi i,*. w. .-.- i O O S M Ti -ti m - \ ”1 W «III?5»*> m z O O X > oo 3 X m jw^xxowm m U4 o> m m o rs» O o n "O ^'D O X o M I i: M ■D l/> M > n M o» O > X M o z tP S 3 5m2 ^50 tn 1/1w in fNj r* m 5 > ^ ^ M o ^ < N S 3 o o > m (/) oS -< »« r- VI ^ ^ Q rv> > >I kS5 r- U4 c- C- o w IH o» M ro o n vn ra f* ^ m m %o > H I^ X r- r- M m </) M > CD CD M OBj < m m Xm X Ii3« as ?c X > o Z o o M oo M ooo 0 01 :* - kxj ' r- w (/> Hisi f“r* c. m m m 0) (/>3 H cn *11 171 X in o ui in9% (/) o M U4 (9-s m in M o> in I H , M I rs> lA U4 IIIw %M a 70 O O M IS> §1233°'^IH (9«sj o n H* in X X >4 in fs> c. m m c» I H* O -g o S'"? ^m«.>C.M H r- m 5 ? in Q > (A fn M in rn q ih <h g r- f- X wm Q .•■Ci O $ X X o m m o M CA r- Z ft X H r- Q w in mg I o X o P m > O M CD in mX X X Hr > !c^ \ 5 ^ ►> m z oo X > o o XX X m CD 3 X £ oo M o 5m M ininU4 in «o lAm U4 rsi 5 5-.® o o M M lA <A H H »ii f»'so> mI iim • X M M IM » O M --•; ' '-'V I 3 r- w O ® C. C. > O IH IM 0» X M X X O > 0» m m M S < >is 3*Oin X o 2 Z r- o 2 2 o»r-P Q m onon X o o o f s5?525 Ob J] 1 lA X *6 ^ X 1 M <« M > 0» w I M M (9 \ A X m ••3/>1 A rfiUlitii 1 1^* aWJ; ■ . tr.- - 3^' wm . ^,;v-' •'’ird , . .^ m » . . .-■ . ^ « ^ . 1 .,' .v ; -■ ■ *• ~i "nvI-*- J* - SiV#? * - ^ ' ' • •• *i-* *•.'•** ., V ?• .• 'v«f/ i:-.; i: -/;•.; eA;/r:.;-.--^;; --■,■> -: '*5^ C •;r ;•;>’• Y,''^ ./. V . ; O , ^U%4 » '•* ..r^'• V- :‘ \y.' >.*' I; i * • • : • . v-' . n - v-'r * ’ ■. . -<t:*^ vjl * V ^'*:n ^v_. I _-;•';•>r;:’:' ■!.•»■.'.'•il *^- ./'• | % . W r . •* »*.—-- .' r*i .:_n*: ; ->. . g». A"'* -. .•*. initial' -TV-.... V ‘ •. :rjmi iId:/’> :j |; •• I V •* CITYOFORONO ADDRESS CODE ___ Oats Crvinected to SEPTIC SYSTEM INVENTORY CARD Municipal Sawar I h { {. ■H- (i - < ! ■“< *i ‘’n I .! > a* f« 1 ; < /; .'a 4 rik AAt«« 3/A.S~ 6-^ At/g- /t/.__________Preparty I.D. Z&~\(&-23 37^ C^gCX^ ^iCstandard tranch □ Mound , . Syitem lypt □ Othor _____________________________ Legal Dticriptlon i^ /OOC> Permit Date of permit ^ **"*/d;*"" Installer HtCOS ^ No. Bedrooms Building type ^igxt f^wpcK^ or GPD Laundry Dishwasher Garbage Disposal SEPTIC TANKS: Matarlal CTor^c (icockr S-Q 2>^^^S~CD p^ccAsr cever^,5ouit> Ocr. ‘ Propar outiat and Inlat BaMlea r")kl - ajex^ r^: C. Liquid depth to RO lovel ^ ~ ^T»»>ac Haight of tank bottom above water tabla OUtanca to neareit building 1 yAlNFIELD: Total length of llnat ^^ Number of llnaa Trench width ■yotal treatment waa (sq. ft.) ______Height of drainfleld above water table -S Se^'ic'A-'A L '/ypa of filter material**^ "^3^ Soil type j Parc rataDittanea from nearest bldg. ^C? ^ Tiia size ^ Depth of fill over drainfleld ^ "~/2. Depth of rock over tile ^ ik\/U •se.v ,mln/in .under tile Cy~ fP- WELL DATA 2 0> c I 9 3° bx: \ 5 «) Eo Is QC *c Q I :n c I 8 w ^ *c Q •I s a S Eo 5 \r ao t,I 8 C 0 MMa» O I ? rw i!c: c tJ8 3O.I ar- ». i \ I I t t. f-1 JtJS/ 1 ■■ INSPECTION RECORD PUMPOUT RECORD LOCATION SKETCH DATE COMPLIANCE DATE GALLONS /Az9-»2- SKiej=v^^A-»(L AJe»d.^ r«.t>. C»/^OO \k *■^1, /V ir/,. 1 V /A)STACLATTOM Qf^ I32£> tjP. JZ ^-8'^ ' Ho Su,^P/Kci\iC> NoTE^ 2. g-/B-g7 /id S oy ^ocl La I' 1^---------------»--------- aM------------ »-------- V#>6r c - CONFORMING S - SUBSTANDARD N - NONCONFORMING Include: 1) Well location Co. |CIX 4 2) Distance from house to seotic tanks, diit. box, and drainfleld 21 North arrow and road ’A.'*’.i ■■-A ... I -r imilffilini'' II'1111111111111 ' •''i I’li'iitr • 'I i' I'lilhiiTiiifirrii ’’ I'ln i . '...... V? * . ?* ; */ .V, at. ‘VV . ••- . i2^- ■■■■Hi'H; y--^M ■ - •■ V 'r^ _. vl'3^ V v:V ■ '•: 'V; mH0mft,’’: .' '%',: |£><\sm Kl Ccr» • ^ '.J,. ;-r •. .... '- • '*. ;■- ir?S’5«wall \ .HH V • A»- • ^H.-vPf -,l . ^• ‘.'• ^ /> • 1-: : . i •> . ■ ■■i-'.i.'^^-' j. : . ~ I ■■■Tjgi;u H:: ■■$■ V : ;• .♦ ^-r ■-■;>:ui P r=>.^ ■•■■' V. . va* ^ ■•-,>*J-'v. s-.. ■ Urn ^ • '^■■9 ■ : . , ,^:'-..;t.-a . ' - '' 1-: TSv w*,—• ^'. ■ ’ ^ V -------------« it-v" Hiiil V”. pMiliSiM b;- J5' ■ nv.!:i:?A-r--:-rnrj ’»:iGahr irr?r!^SSS ..Pv ,v .>:-v .-V.- ?. ■■;■- j: *■- r,yi.Ct \H» ■ ,.VK *.-•§ •••% •? ■ " r; -'■•■V- •«•'• '» T"’' «•■'•■’ ' ■♦■H4 ,•* *...*♦'. ^*; -»r.-V 4 S-’ '■■' * .T.,".'t'. , ^ ■ ':.. •. ■p.:*-*.*' ^. •'•'** ••• '• »-*->.., ■ ;x‘v % V s ■•■'>• ',■ jf: f ;• » ■■•. ,-?.V -M. •-■ ■,' «. ;•> ■* •<»J5 •■,.,■•. ' Sy. ~ ' ■•. .WlB •:■■- , V*T I ..v« ■••V ., . ■• :..' ■»•■ .-•■ ... ... > •'ii-V - . r^-r-. . »>.'r , ■ ^, • '. .'. ^ ’ V.;. #>•. V , . *•• ■ -a. » ■ '■ • .-.■ >■ ■''■ ■: ■.:■■■ *X i V - ; j - ■ ••'*«' - . ^.• •< -.. i' ^St*-' J.^ . V.W' ATV To: fiw.- ^S'o--:. Chainnan Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator 7, Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator March 10, 1992 ^ W—■ * i '■ #1720 City of Orono, Section of Fox Street Located Between Orono Orchard Road & South Brown Road Conditional Use PermitA’ariance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 - City proposes filling and grading activities in excess of 100 cubic yards. Total proposed project involves the filling of 700 cubic yards of fill to expand shoulder area of Fox Street. Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - Filling will take place within a portion of a protected DNR wetland and City designated wetland where no filling activities are allowed. Filling of a DNR protected wetlands will require review and approval of both DNR and MCWD before project can begin. List of Exhibits A - Harlan Olson Report of March 9, 1992 R B - Certificate of Mailing & List of Affected Property Owners C - Profile of Existing Roadbed & Area To Be Filled f D - Location Map Eeview of Application V. - ■ '•:'v ' ■ :'P: Please refer to enclosed Exhibit A, Mr. Olson reviews the need for the proposed improvement project. Staff must ask that the permit not be scheduled for review and action by the Council until the DNR and MCWD have had adequate time to review the proposal. V*.- Qv-Vi ■tiV- . ^ The project is to be completed by Public Works personnel. All work shall follow the guidelines set forth in the City Engineer's report and performed per final approved plans for the expansion of the roadbed. Erosion control shall be maintained through the entire project until disturbed area is restored to natural state. The Planning Commission may wish to add other conditions to the approval. I J*.-V ryt _ _ _ _ ••■V: -i ...i % % f-- Si /■ vv: 'Mift ferf'''::-*'i:rvfsS ■:>f '. ■ ♦"Ti ■tM • ;'<y*4' • »r ■- -7 T^y’ < --^ ' J'A's 'v_;::::f: r*'Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk& |\ I Associates Engineers & Architects Orto G Boncstroa PE Joseph C. Anoeffik. PE, Marvin L. Sorvaia. PE Pichaid E TUmer. PE Gienn R Cook. r.E Thomas E Noyei PE RObett G. SchurKht PE. Susan M EOerfen. CPA Keitn A. GoflOon. P£ Richard W. Foster PE. Jerry A Bourdon. PE Mark A Hansoa PE. Oavid O Loskoca. PE HOOert C. Russek. AIA. Howard A. San<drd. PE. Donald C, BurgaidL PE. TW K. Fiew. PE. Michael T Rauemann. PE fiooert R PJWfene. PE. Thomas W Peterson. PE Mchad C. Lynch. PX James R. MaUnd. PE Ker>neth P Anoenon. PE. Mark R RORV P£ Thomas E Angui PE. Damef J. Edgenon. PE. Mark A Se<x PE Phl^) I Caswell. PE Ismael Mamr^ PE Mark D WMo. PE. Thomas R Anderson. AIA Ga-7 F. Ryiander PI. Miles B Jensen. PE L Phsup Grawet «. PE. Rene C Pluman AJA Agnes M Ring. AlCP Jerry D Pertnch. PE Ceciko Olivier PE. Gary W Monen. PE Karen u. Wiemen, PE Keith R. vapo PE Mchaef P Rau. PE Charles A Enckson Leo M. Paw«fsky Harlan M Olson March 9, 1992 tarn-City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 / Attn: Jeanne Mabusth Re: City of Orono’s Application #1720 BRA File No. 139-1720 Dear Jeanne: V f-li Enclosed please find a location plan and proposed cross-section of the shoulder area being filled on Fox Street. The fill area is located approximately 400 feet west of Orono Orchard Road on Fox Street and will extend westerly for 1,100 feet. The existing roadway section is 20-22 feet bituminous and narrow shoulders. The proposed fill area is to provide an 8 foot shoulder on both sides of the roadway. The estimated amount of fill required to complete this work is 700 cubic yards. Erosion control fence should be installed along the toe of the slope on both sides of the roadway. ■■.•.'VVi -y The proposed fill area will protect the in place roadway. Water level near the edge of the roadway has and will continue to cause damage to the subgrade and bituminous surfacing. A wider shoulder area will protect the motoring traffic by increasing the reaction zone and keeping cars away from the edge of the wet land. If I may be of any further assistance, please contact me at 636-4600. . 5 Yours very truly, ■■ -r- BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC Harlan M. Olson ■xtgmM^y HMO:pah:enc 139-GEN\139.COR ^'4. 'y . fV» / ■ 1- • . A f'-y r: V' iV 4: I -V i<-- •/ **•? 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 • J.' . ■■ ’ >:;y «^i. M-^ .•-.w CERTIFICATE OF IILING STATE OF MINNESOTA )•'• j ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss ) CITY OF ORONO ) :!ih I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1720, was mailed to the attached list of property owners ■i In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 3rd day of March, 1992. .J V- ■’ ■ Jamie/Bosma -mm p' "$C '• p’ r i?.:. ':p, ,* ’ •f :^‘-. i >.- ' I • ‘-i *• ■ .1 ->r ■ .A > < .^v' >• mi ■ _.- ~ -•..V' ll, . 'P;-!:'A.':;: :lhU , ^ W‘' . , ■«-p. ■., r>. t .•; • •'' ‘V. - ■ K'}%''i^-:-^ f-' '. 'i>/. ‘.'.Vv\-; . . mm P*''': ■ •.; .■ • kk^i ^ :m- -li.;.,. ;, :• *. :i^-- .%7i: *> m.. r;' ♦; . vi; •V':.vr^ ,. ■ V.-J I'h^ >i'*' /': ■'^\ ■; ■miia .tv « •• . ■ fc : , ■ / . Jk‘vr, Vt**‘ <A::- . gF,j|;^' >•,;. ^:,Tk;V %Jr . .. ' ■ Property Owners List for City of Orono #1720. -y Iv-/' ' >> 'S' -N -. -A- Edward Hamm 485 Orono Orchard Road South Wayzata, MN 55391 T> ‘'^i- ■ ..:;V-:t> . >-/r> ..! ^ ,•'•- • '.A '■« *' Richard Perkins 1485 Fox Street Wayzata, MN 55391 •V- .o*'.' '^h - ' . ‘=V •:-■ '•* 1 /.t- ■ ■ ‘ . ;• : j-.- ^ .-.i ,;^-'f. w"* * -s? *s Katharine Tearse 1520 Fox Street Wayzata, MN 55391 ■V . *'. i. John & Joan Nolan 1540 Fox Street Jfayzata, MN 55391 yr. VrA/ ■• -■V \=. . •• , *-. " • • •* -•» > if-: .> Mrs. Cargill MacMillan 1620 Fox Street ;-y "N :y,S"S4^;y'S;Vv S W^- Wayzata, MN 55391 .. ' - ■"* ■■ '■■■■ ■ ■ ■■ ■-'- ■■-- ■“■ ,,: >,•'■■ ' M ■ /f • •*. 'A. f''V i-■«: A"'.‘. y- •V*’ Albert Hanser .::y-:;4.A; 1685 Fox Street ■ ■■'- Wayzata, MN 55391 \ ■y i r* ? ^ ■■ ■. ■ 4- •• •? •■ " i ^’■»:■■ •\ •v\’.y.. 4>. • * * .’ . h . • / • '^4. ^ ... t .-?v ■. /•“ ; ■ J .•j*■.:4y: ' ^4'■:y-A.vy 1vyyy:aa#ai A:.y:-¥y,-<-.: T : .. -I .■■■y -y. : ■■ '4 ; •• V. . • •■ . - .f- 'yy’^.y:; ’• •• :■ ymti ^^ymy: ymgj^ . ■ •■»> o ’ -s--- . ,i.... . • -'. ■ . ■ ■/ ^'■■- •^•'\'. • ,jv •■ ‘ : ■ ■ ■' •^' •. .. -, y ;•'■ " ■' •' ’ ’•, - , . ... ..............................................................................................................................................................•■• •; ■ .:;'-.'o •• •• ■•■•■•fo ■•':■■ •■:• •"••..■ y,-:±'A 1.} ■■ ' 4^" ’ - . ■ ■ *-. ’ .• • • :1 -J ,. . WAy^^"y'y-)y-r ... ■.■'t ■/••.. ;. ■ -4 • A. . t4.. .'v .v.y; ^ . .4 •''4 ■■: > i- .?■' ■ -"v ,.' ’. .Ay;' yy y:. v:y ■yo..^..^:. - • i • 4 ' ” y-y-yOiS'y- . • . • • .. .••, ^.. . . ■ • ■' ■ . >': ..? ■•: "■ »*•\ ykM .A’• *L»'•* - • •.• ••■'I- 4*pyy y4y4i"yy'y:--y ^4«:yyy4vy:-^:yy;y ’'^^^ ' i*4y'^#«sy"'yy"S4yy mmy-m &mmyyy . -A '• *■ ■'' f-y ... . •;■■ '4^.44 y '•■ • '"Vv:- V y'/y ‘•.•••T-’/*’■*>' 'S' siy.-S• ^ • •- .. V* i •» :•- ■',..y av-.-••*•■■ Mm ■y v^•. '• yyyyy.- lyy":--- ' ■ ' -s '. ■5,; ysfe?r.,•-,» .- *v ; ■■ ^ ;.-"y*5?r.' y-.y« :,'4' V,^^. ; 4^';4 : .■ ■ -vr :^y :-4- •. ' . ' •- . yyy--:. yy y^.-4,-^y. yy ^y4y',y‘^^ yA^AA. yyy—.A ?y.y.'■i^yy. mmmMiMMM : . :r y.A^wyy-.,^= •i ; ^MT »:. av . ' ..v '-y . -y. -4 v y- ' ' .y •' *». y V-Vip.' •l^.v ■ :’K- 4yy^-' . , • -./iu, ■:'4,. V :vA -#■*.y ym^yym ■. - • L- .f *. i.-rf ■ 11 ..t-. r 5? - • :.-S r ♦ yy-4 /Af ■ iSti^yOyy:—^4^^y wm Hjti ■< K-.. ..'SP wmmmm 'r ■ te?;- ^''t; v:' 1^ J Bonestroo ^y* Rosene m^n Anderllk & Associates Client: ^yC^A^c/.Page Proiect: ^0c.c3?T^Proj. No./Jf Calculations For Acc.Prepared Dote: 2. C?A STTtfiTT Reviewed By:Dote: »/ !.■ :>?’X-'' --------J--------^ r 1.-------r— ^ 1 »1 ^ ! ' «; I ,1 : i »i ; ; '•V- ?j i • ■: '. i ’ •1 . *. 1 —1 i i - *i ' i11'1 s 1. ^ i }f » a i 1 * *?. ' ’ 1 # *i • J ■ ii tmy: m§ ;r;i. . .?* ''*;^,r- -- Oi' ” fi^- f. ■ . ; ' ,._y -.^-'JL'", ' L\ -rV-; • '•'• |y’ ... ” '• i ii • j W \[ ' i' !/• ’k II _t . «.• :«» v«» •« • A% 4 . . ..« .#«» I ; / 4-.^:------- I- i ■ : ; uL' L^i ' i ^ i 1 I i ' :. ; i J__. ■" ' i ^ M ^ j^ )> * 1 ^;' . 1 ^ ; 1 i k 1 ‘ L 1 \ ? i 1 1 J ____i____L____1 1 ,i f \i . 1 i _ i i____1 * ■ ! 1 {! I ’ !. ! ; i i ^• ! ! f i • ’ 1 ' It; I » • : ! ; }1 1 ^ : ! : : ! I- 1 !... . J . 1 i ‘ ; • \ • . L • ^ __i___ !» » 1i i ; ! ! r 'j1 1 ; ! J_1L-----J L j ,l f I 4 l J 'i i-y'- ■■>:■■■ '■'sw -.•i'v.:: . 1 ■:i 0R 6NQ -ORCnAnD R [ aBT T5"TDT TP"nr tt ■jr" > >y **»••• j o ^S r ^5 c-£ '^...V FM ifis nssz fete... ,r -,' 47. . ♦ ■ ‘ y» c.-- • -I,,. H- ▼j*T. sEPiep!' Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator fw From: Date: Subject Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator March 10, 1992 #1722 Howard Eisinyer, *^245 Wayzata Boulevard - Renewal Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing ■4^ Zoning District: RR-IB, Rural residential, 2 acre minimum Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19 and 20 - Conditional use permit required for filling and grading activities in excess of 100 cubic yards. Applicant has filed for a second renewal conditional use permit application for the filling of 100,000 cubic yards in a 12-acre area, the location of a former dump site. The original conditional use permit (Application #1103) was approved on June 8, 1987. The first renewal conditional use permit was approved on October 24, 1988. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owner List D - Staff Memo to Planning Commission, Council for Application »:310 E - Cook Sketch of Typical Section F - Braun Engineering Letter of 5/28/87 G - Proposed Fill Site H — Cross Section North/South View I - Cross Section East/West View J - Resolution #2526 Approving Application #1310 K - Harlan Olson Review 3/10/92 L - Planning Commission Minutes 8/15/92 M - Council Minutes 10/24/88 N - Cook Report 8/31/88 Revi^ of Applications #1103 and #1310 m V:' As already noted, the applicant has appli*“d for a renewal conditional use permit to permit 100,000 cubic yards of fill to be placed on the 12-acre site. Review Exhibits E, G, H and I. Fill is to be placed at an average 5' depth. Side slopes to be held at a 5:1 ratio. A minimum 35' setback shall be maintained from the surrounding wetlands located at the 972 elevtion. The Braun Engineering letter of May 1987, Exhibit F, confirms no risk of sharing as a result of placing the additional surcharge load. Silt fencing shall be installed on all sides of the fill site at a width of 30-35'. Staked hay bales shall be placed when deemed necessary by inspection personnel. Review Exhibit E. In order to address the City's concerns for the duration of time 'v', •. ■n i ■f: ■4 '^11 T7':’r . ^-TT- T-rn. ■ pr f.;»: IP ■•';" 7 ^ ^ ' V{ V IXi ••'■•. • ■S.M' ,’ V.- . f t - soils may remain in an undisturbed state, the engineer recommends seeding to be completed on or about the 15th day of the month of May, June, September, October and November. Unfinished side slopes to be graded and seeded periodically during those periods but the top of the fill area would remain unseeded until finished elevation is reached. The process of seeding the disturbed side slopes would also prevent erosion during the period of filling. Review Resolution #2526, Exhibit J. The resolution sets forth special procedures developed by the Planning Commission in the 1988 review. Filling activiti#>s were not to be conducted during 6:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Prior to the fill project an Crono Police representative was to be present at a pre~construction meeting. Review of Current Application Mr. Eisinger has filed a renewal application so that he may receive approximately 3,000 to 5,000 cubic yards of fill from the City facility site on the north side of Highway 12, To staff's knowledge, Mr. Eisinger has no other prospect for the receipt of free fill, although he has noted that the State Highway Department will have additional fill (approximately 2 to 3 thousand cubic yards) sometime in 1992-1993 as a result of planned improvements within the immediate area. Once again,^ the amounts are noted at a few thousand, no where near the original 100.000 cubic yards proposed in the former conditional use permit. Applicant may be best advised to amend the conditional use permit to 10,000 cubic yards (1,000 dump truck loads) to be completed over a two year period of time. The City should not be asked to approve maximum of a 100,000 cubic yards when the applicant himself acknowledges that there is no apparent supply of free fill. Mr. Eisinger is aware of only two projects where fill may become available within the next two years. But once again there is no guarantee that the MnDot project will provide free fill if there is an available buyer. This is what happened with the original proposals of 1987 and 1988. The City of Orono has guaranteed Mr. Eisinger the 3,000 to 5,000 cubic yards of fill. The permit may be written to allow a total receipt of 10.000 cubic yards to cover potential receipt of fill from MnDot. As in the earlier conditional use permits, the applicant will be responsible for executing a Developer's Agreement and providing a Letter of Credit to ensure completion of project and grading and seeding during fill process (if fill remains in an undisturbed state for over 60 days). In the current application Mr. Eisinger is the sole applicant and is not joined by a construction company as before. As a result, Mr. Eisigner will be responsible for obtaining necessary permit approvals from the MCWD and updating all previous permits issued by the DNR, MPCA and Hennepin County Department of Environment and Engineering. Please review Exhibit K, Olson has recommended that fill first be placed in low areas to minimize undermining of surface drainage and that remaining fill be placed uniformly over the entire fill area. Seeding was to be completed immediately to ^7; -V'' - ■ i •• ■ ' ■ i ' 'i 'V*- -' 'iHiSB;l'>.;:‘V ';■ Vi:' ■■.»<?.„• . ,. . y prevent erosion.•4t: Options of Action To approve renewal conditional use permit for Howard Eisinger that would approve a total of 100,000 cubic yards of fill to be placed on the 12-acre site subject to all the conditions set forth in the original permit. p!M&. 'fWm &*«■ OR iM Deny applicant's renewal conditional use permit as proposed and recommend that the current conditional use permit be limited tc 10,000 cubic yards to be completed over a 2-year period based on upcoming improvement projects of the City of Orono and the State Department of Transportation. This approval is based on conditions of approval set forth in Resolution #2526 of the City that set forth guidelines and procedures for the filling of the site. Upon applying for a land alteration permit with the City, applicant shall provide an amended plan for the review of the City Engineer. Permit shall not be issued until the City Engineer has approved the amended filling project. Isv ‘Jt W m fePP: ' X*-• I \ ^ yM m HINA'S*,,-: mMmmmyiyiss v;' ■ •./«? Lr-.-’V»'4 iftf'- -a'Vi:x-■■•:>■* 'M • - M S»TO.'i , ... V : - Ji-S Jv''#»• <<,>•• r y.' v; , .. ■ 'J'" • ri' Ti'4 "u- • VjV;. xkiiSi ** mm&M ' '■ ■ -h '■ ••'. . , ‘ a*mm v>, iWiii V* mteK'. :; • ■ U' K:'^ : ■■• ■ ...f;•■ . j . V-*,, i** ^ 'L'±', %V' t ■■S.' ‘S*'- . . m£m ^ '• - A- • : c ^ -v."VX-'-A , N- i-;--•■■■.V t*’ ,' v'.» •* '•••’ ‘ OP OROHO - GENERAL LAND USB APPLl PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 3 '2. 4 4'' g? '{ ■; ? Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) :?r.-//r- ^ ^'4 Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. E'.APPLICANT : .. ;Name Phone (home) ^ 3 "yx.<7(9 Phone (work) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ■- #.• Address —? gv<^y , ^^_ _ _ City Zip ^ -? .y ^7* ■^r OWNER (if different than applicant) Name --------------------------------- Phone (home) .. • ■ 'I Phone .;;P ' ^ S38/ ■ Address City Zip Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PEES - CONDITIONAL DSE PERMITS - Wm u $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $1J0.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration CITY OF OROHO FIH^CE OFFICE 1350200000 01 CEH lOOM CHECK TL 100,00 RECEIPT-THAHK YOU H235670 cool f<0t T10:i 02/24/: Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more ^ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore PRD/PID ~ see fee schedule Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 f'; M-' " i. .J . Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $300.00 Resoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule .^1 >' v'' M o _ _ * tit'., • p?-T***’ \ ■ ■F I. PRBSENT OSS OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District % i':t Present Use of Property Residential >0^ other (specify) r.DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST it-Describe request in detail:L ^ A,.. /c'^ 2. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS *1. Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtair this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan» if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. mm YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11* X 17” OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:Date ■ iim APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred In review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date i’- OWNERS SIGNATURE The cwner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorised reasoned^le entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of Investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date J^plicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Conmission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. mm ■ Ik •i5 'Xti ■‘='1 -1* i,; > •*. f ■ ''• V msmSil ife zt^ta 1^ €sp •V V; ««5»^ S3^§ r* ^ ^ 0S3 t5“’o? V*m M Bis- §sS^ \.f *»8ii^a <1^ .'v ■z vfi o — a ® ^V« 2 X r- O A. ..• •V, »«- * . JJ. • < ^.. »^S i. •- Z ■ f' • 1V/’;- / gi ' y’'> V *5llP jsa^^s-vtf •< o r- «0 o M“ A X3 O s «®3Sf QH n o w Q A A «s» S M ^ • A A n ^• M o M n v»© r» •- n cn w f- ^ ►-< o A O (T* 8 S z O Ma-9,s* CS*»5 ? m ^ 2 ^__ > « P ► A3 VI M - ViZ r» -i P -4 ► ip n ^ #• A r- C9 f» O) ? ‘..f.•J'r •'iv^^> **:j;''>'t- ,»* i -.- i/i ,4^.vK ig3SS« ^ mm v» ip ?5**SSr o r r VI 4/1 •« M M 0> r- r- o Oi 3 p r- f- m Z D ^ (n ► ► _ r r- f •< • V» Cl CM A ' n S & ^ Vi r« «4-sss^soA r* O s ^ v« O C9 A W Q \n 9o 9 •» VI ^ A O •-I n w w«v "CS|55 i > g A fS.% _ ^ ^ Vi A t «.ni ■* j C I 4 .•fc*. (I 1 . '/f.' V ,• r _ . ,♦ » • ^ ;v^ ii-" 4 y -' r p^../ I .»* * *V*' J ‘i i’< V ^ Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Proa: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator August 8, 1988 #131C Howard F. £isinger, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard - Renewal Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning Distrlcc - RR-lG Pertinent Sections of the Code - Section 10.03, Subdivision 19, 2C - Conditional use permit for fill and grading in excess of 100 cubic yards. Section 10.Ov - Conditional use peinit procedure. Review of Application - Renewal of conditional use ps^riiit - Apelication #1103 approved by the Council on June 8, 1987. Applicaticr. mvcives -.;.ie filling of approximately 100,000 cubic yards of clean fill with..n *» 12.5 acre propei y - former dump site. Applicant proposes no chanc-.!S irv,m tne original application^approved by the Council. Fill to be placed such that, the r be maintained at 5*. All land alterations shall adjacent wetland areas. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Staff Memos to Council Reviewing Exhibit E - Cook's Sketch of a Typical Cross Exhibit F - Braun Engineering Letter Dated 5/ Exhibit G “ Propo.sed Pill Site - Plan Exhibit H - Cross Section East/West Exhibit I - Cross Section North/South Exhibit J - Resolution 12192 Approving Origin Review of Current Application - The applicant appeared before the Council a requesting an extension of the original condit advised the Council chat an extension could be g to 60 days but asked the applicant to define th Mr. Eisinger confirmed that nothing had begun a could ho conceive that the project could be comp for that fact, by the end of M'>vembe.. Staff i applicant's best option would be to file a ren original conditional use permit, providing no c application, as it was clear, Mr. Eisinger woul complete total fill project of 100,300 cubic yardi application 11310, a renewal conditional use pe from the oriqinal application submitted over a ye r • • ‘v V -> •• K f* • ' ^ •‘'*31 / % . ' r*..|4 W ' • \ V r , 4 . . • {'V • .< '» • *" I .*«• , C 4» *!' •!VV •• ' . ■ i /Lk -« fe' K. *i*'* " \ iif * mm 'JT-»' V** * V • r, «• %« ^‘. »»v>- m*y,v->z »*’V' Pm. *^H:-m ja-'V-spp k v1^; ht.«» »i*\ t B,';: t rif.'.-tr'-’y y w" ■-'* V V * *'' V' r‘* -- '/. s-r-'-i-- K?l* Cfi .ffli ? ;V V i:s;. : - ^ ^f*« V ■ Zoning Pile 11310 August 8, 1988 Page 2 of 2 Renewal of Application #1103 - The original conditional use permit approved the filling of the former dump site on ^he Eisinger property, totalling 12 acres in area, to a maximum of 100,000 cubic yards of clean fill from the 1-394 improvement project (review Exhibits E, G, H, and 1). Council accepted the Planning Commission and staff recom,..endation to limit fill to a maximum of 100,000 cubic yards resulting in no more than a 5* overall increase in height from the existing elevations at the dump site. As proposed, all filling would take place approximately 35’ from the designated wetland area that surrounds the dump site on both the east and west sides. ^*®®olution 12192 reviews the limits of the land alterations approved with the application and also sets forth the gj^delines by which the fill project will be maintained by the applicant, under the supervision of the City staff's inspections. Staff has reviewed those original conditions. It is not clear how long the City will allow exposed earth to remain on the property prior to the final grading and seeding. Consider the application that involved the filling of a 11* high berm on County Road 6 in the western part of the City. The filling began over a year ago and the berm has remained in a disturbed condition for over a year. Staff is concerned that once this filling project begins, there may be lapses in time where exposed sections of eart^ remain at the site for long periods of time. There will of course be adequate erosion control provided throughout the project. The resolutiwn should provide clear guidelines for the staff responsible for supervising this project, when areas remain with fill e ------------ --- ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ m e A ^ ^unattended for over 30-60 day periods of time, staff should either be directed to bring the application before the Council for further direction or to immediately require applicant to complete the final grading of the area and seed immediately. It may be that these concerns are not valid, as once the filling begins on a project this size, there may be no delays in the hauling of the materials. The applicant and the representative from Park Construction, Mr. Gannon, should provide more background on this phase of the application. If any of the new members on the Planning Commission seek additional information or imput on the part of staff, please contact my office prior to the meeting. >>t-aff Recommendation - To approve the renewal conditional use permit application of Howard Eisinger for the property located at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard, subject to the findings and conditions set forth in the approval Resolution 12192 and based on the additional information from the applicant's contractor, that the following guideline be added to the new approval resolution, as follows: That at no time shall any section of fill be- 1 lowed to remain in an unattended state at greater than 5:1 slopes .d not seeded for over ____ days. ■ **. ■' •*vl 1. • ' -I'i*: --AniAm ‘ y . ■ / - 'fi t 4: i: i.m !:v. V'*4^ *■■■ I i‘v V> • ■p Date: Planning Commission Chaintian Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Dernhardson »l®snne A. Mabusth/ Duilding i> Zoning Administrator September i, 1988 • r % ,.; mm 5^ ;s'. fl. Subject: #1310 Howard P. Eisinger, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard - ■ Conditional Use Permit - Second Review Actif p August Planning Coramisio? ren^i«nV.4.4« Eisinger have an authorized fo- contracting firm that will be responsible to*, doing the filling under the MNDOT contract for 394 improvements. Some of the questions raised by the Planning S??nnf*^ r" outlined for Mr. Eisinger in that notice!Planning Commission may wish to aJter or add others. The Cicy Engineer has made a recommendation regarding the allowed duration of time disturbed earth should be allowed to remain on site before it must be seeded. Review his lewter of August 31, 1988. Cook recommends periodic seeding of suggesting that the side slopes be graded and seeded by approximately the 15th day of the month of .lay, June, August, September, October, and November when deemed Inspecting staff. Note t.hat he would suggest remain in an undisturbed atate until the finish elevation is achieved. Maintaining the aide slopes in a seeded atate will prevent further eroalcn of the site during the long installation. Staff RocomMiidatloii - approval subject to adding the following conditions already set forth in the original approval resolution enclosed in your August packets. Exhibit J: « T*'® require periodic seeding and grading of aide slopes during the time the property is receiving fill. Appxicant/owner will be asked to grade and seed the side slopes at cpproxlreatoly the 15th day of the months of May, June, August, September, October, and November if deened necessary by the inspecting staff. ..u ••tlafaction of the answers to the qveatlons posed by Commiaalon to the applicanfa contractor, the Planning Commiaalon may wish to add other conditions found yerporiate under the authorization of a conditiona l use permit by the City of Orono. ~ ----------- — -V- ‘ , M •-r m-mm V ''i \ '-•.* .isssg; iv:j^ m 'T- fi":x.v‘tii'^ m ’it (f. . .,,,. -S-' '••.■•> ?rv--.-i «y r V '•* • « « r; •:' /'.H >.- •V‘* ^ •■ * 1' ' *• ‘•*:^ .A D Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth# Building & Zoning Administrator Date: October 19, 1988 Subject: 11310 Howard F. Eisinger, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard - Renewal Conditional Use Permit “ Resolution List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit 0 E P G H 1 J K L Exhibit M - Staff Memo of 8/8/88 Staff Memo of 9/1/88 Application Plat Hap Property Owners List Staff Memos to Council Reviewing Application #1103 Cook's Sketch of a Typical Cross Section Braun Engineering Letter Dated 5/28/87 Propoeed Fill Site - Plan Cross Section East/West Cross Section North/South Resolution #2192 Approving Original Conditional Use Permit Planning Commission Notice of Action 8/23/88 Cook Letter Dated 8/31/88 Park Construction Letter Dated 9/29/88 Review of Application - The renewal application of Howard Eisinger was reviewed at two P«teAnnin9 Commission meetings. Once dg&in^ the mejor concern of the Planning Commission was the duration of the filling, traffic/safety concerns during the hauling process and how to deal with the disturbed earth during the filling process. It should be noted that Mr. Eisinger has application from the original permit apollcatlon. We are still dealing with the filling of approximately 100,000 cubic yards of from the upgrading of the 394 project. Pleaae review Exhibits X, L and M, that provide more detail on the major issues raised during the current review. In Park Construction's letter of n.’tptember 29, 1983, Gannon responds to the Planning Commisiaon's concern regarding duration of time required to complete the project, as applicant has given no definite time period of the duration of t.he filling project, he advises if the fill Is available, it could bo completed within five weeks, and if it is scarce, it could span a period of 6 months to a year. Review Exhibit L, Cook recommends that unfinished side slopes be grades* snd seeded periodicaIxy during the course of ^e project, noting that the • op of the fill areas should be graded and seeded v/hen the finished elevai .‘s reached. It would be the Inspection staff s responsibility v.o ord-' '' seeding per the recosunended planting schedule provided by Cook. Th i. fr-,i of site maintenance will also prevent erosion during the tJjao of the fl;.lii.g operations. ,v:v 2 ' “*W . .• V* I ■< Vi.' • f. V*. ’‘i-A f ' 5 / . A •j »• - ’ . “'.S f/y . V 4 ,1 '£jVo •*. m Wm f V 1 IJ ‘ ■4 I f ■( nr-:.; ♦■yv- i V v"^Vt • ^ <1 *■ .'?•%• ‘-.-..v'vl Zoning Pile 11310 October 19, 1988 Page 2 o£ 2 > 2'-',7-'';.'. '’•' **' *» •# t ..• i J\ <\ . • . • ' - ■• -I ■ *iV:\'r,.;-v wv.y ;v •U' V-») V V A ' Wv 1 J- r * ;>w In addition, the Planning Commission dealt with traffic/HAPA«>v controls to be established during the time of hauling. trafflc/safoty Planning Commission recommended approval of the renewal’..^ eendltlon.l u.e permit appUc.tlon o£ Howard'^ EiainVr aa«Pt”S Thi C? •■i'lition. aaxec tha Council 'to 1 J.-', • ■* J'f V jv;X»''*v f a V" w [T • -» - - i I V*• ,‘A w.v*_•. Hr !-• •••'• 'r^> y'"' '■ , ’ ’ ‘ a’n ^to?flV^a activities between the rush hours of 6i30 'XlieQe to 8i30 asOi* and 4:00 p.m* to 6:00 PaCia - ^ 2. To ask the Orono Police Department to be represented at the " construction conference with the city Engineer and City staff*^ a representative of the Police OepartLnt worid have more Infl^^^ pertaining to questions of trafficAafety. insight ■' '>'V-'vs'"' ^ '''•a •■ g: t* V a' reeoaSnd«Im”'“ resolution ha. been drafted per the Planning Commle.lon*. M 1 ■•I •e 1; i 1 . -j »l * ie^'a' -;v tiea is -* i.I «?»•■- .’’'e ■ *• HI - 'a •iv^Ji: vO* *r/% jmr> ^ : G LJ 1 i ?•-p-4 1 I ^ * f -I 1 ;■ 1 ! 9 !—■»— 1r -f—^^5 j 1 t 1 i 1 < i T“1 1-—1 : . i . •i. j—1 * . 11 I 1 : • t • 1 $ M i !• 1 1 f •. »«• • •i .1 • * *i i 1 •• •• -4 i :< *• » • •• ••f« ‘ ;1 1 » » ' »•1 • H mm •»»Q jjl *9 00^IA0yj ~lP/^/fi. 0440 ••H"♦ff/ mo k 1 ^• • * T^P’'™rw '^P •i#0| »•»»•»( ‘SM*T}OSSV 1 16TSD8NV *3i3B0l WmcaMf^ V ,■* -/* • .*^ /• iPf imm-s j.'k! ‘.ft ?:^35 .V >.• % ■ v"'VK:*••■•«-'Tr'*‘'’4W ''■■V:i! ^'-'‘ *' ' •'^ ?•”.* >' '. rm ‘V • - ■• Oiiv • . ^ v4^ ■"f * ■ ■ ■■• ' ^ f •J^*lr-« f •■, if xrz'^' " .7- V *"■*>€>0,^*^ •- r* ^ ^' y ^ ^ i, ' • ■ ? ' »k « ^ X *,' t i-_ V*; -r «^*^ • .sT^’*r~:! • » fc « ' ,s ■ ;' t .' / » . kk' 15 iV ^ •. ■i'l t ■»*. 'm -;^'’• / -j ,.'f • *'l ;C' ■ ,4-j •-./■ L • { msssm y-'*y m'M WttB«Mr^R»m4aT S..u.ss CNCINSEniNC «5JH ^1,5^ ,kl uMur ^ #c ^♦P«r To: 5^/1 Kay 28, 19C7 P.O. Box 35X08 Mpla., MN 55435 (612) 941-5600 '... •V/?' • T-fc 5a«v :S;^ - >w, . , : >• %^:> rarh Construction Attn: Ht, John Cannon ?500 Booch Street Minneapolis, MN 55432 •j*’% .'• RE: E^•^ >.■ ■■ '"t-^ li •;ss^v. :-m. iiri Mr. Cannon: 73-157 ENCINSSRING OPINION Addition of ?ill to Existing r,andfill South of Tn-12 at Classen Lake Orono, Minnesota i y-ir f*7^V U:.- ■ ■ s. Oianijara ?»netr.ii:'on teat ■'o-’-ea-nioraatlon »roji three 1073, with retiree- -o von- ''t P<^*Ported in April, placenent that is "o-oDo-ed * ^«rhn * additional fill Council K3 wheti.er'tha add*<t‘op members of the City ' 'ill area win because ^or‘?;«-.?fM a"-*" existing land! ■:h« undorly:.r.^ o^ganirsoils: Possible failure into . •^* ^ ••>. % •« dopthfl ranoino from 5-» "-e.*-.«"-® the surface todopthfl ranging from 22 feet "to* 35"f!Sr ”* w ”® surface to landfill wen not extended easrov^p fr* understand that the depicted on the a *-^0?°^ sJ!rrS e K Pf®PO»®^ landfill area as the area of the "exiatlno landVn conditions int)#CAU!i« ^ha Aran 5 l^indfill have been assumed similar o£ the or'9.nic »oUs uVo'V1ra°ry.“ wci^ndi «lthou?h depths t“ ists'lJSO A’’\h? p“ «nt *ti4’ '‘r**: filled In ; 7 ’^ «l,tlh, ..rf.ee ,lev.tl°en. !.*?S p^l K’ S', 7 -V 4»* «•- ^ . .^.S ‘..e • TyV • v.:p: • • ■ • P ■ r- • . y. 0ON«u,T.wo,>da^K>>s,^^-— , ::;v^7r: y comBnitBpoi»mCTiAc«-.>.ww.>^^T---------■ — - • • .' . T' v7- -E.' ; - . W •...............t»rg*«cofm^^ _. 6,»m> Cr».Ko«m«w tju»omo>m. ."'^•. r V ‘7 ?4^' I ^r f. ■ ^ V j - - ,V' 1 y *; -3 .* •%! ir' - • -N - ■ ^ V1 y*;Ji v^r>4rT^Vv ^ I - t V—■•* 3f» .* »'*,*^^ . .< . *t '^. rV*'''- » / * »; V 73-157 ParX Construction -2-yjiy 23» 153 i of tne existing landfill saterxal the undisturbed wetland area is at about elevation This 4-£oot difference in elevation probao-y represents wnat . Jould eSect to be the aaount of settlement that has result^ f?Sm the weight of the existing landfill material compressing the or^nlc subsoils below. You indicated that the existing tand...* matafial i* about 14 feet thicic. Judging from the length of tire that the MtJrill has been in place, and your indication that t..o.e have bee" nV-revious stability problems, it is our opinion that the proposed 'addition the^^tep^ o.^the Sii^tln; TaVdfVli'gradeV-presents a very ’tailure. Our experience with projects wnere additions* .1** .s placed above existing lar.dfi** naterialjala above swaxrp deposits has rasuited"'ln' addTtional sett I'^^onU Jeh"" - hat * 11 composition of the existing landfill ard a orobablv possesses a rather high .nternal angle o. ra?hSr hffh sLar strength. The settlement tnat has cccurr^ over the past 50 years has also increaseo the shear strength ot the uppo? zone oi organic soils which a^essens t.*e or pulcoirg i.iluro .. » r=»uU or p'.acrn, od oocr-.ror.o- ourchorce louc. Thus# bnsed wh X r»i orr^*ut «o*« #it: xc our cpi- nion that tno addition of 5 Met of fill over the area presents vbfy ftllght risi< ou o.'nbin/c3\eht f^^^urc* ; l r«V ■T ss;ij?!i!"rir: “s-n: placing any fill, s-veral sett.onrnt rcniwor.nv _ inntalled in various areas, pref-^rnoly «-c-nd the existing landfill limits, ana that the ‘t.,., placed in two atages of 2 1/2 feet per stage. Se.-een .i.-s. th monitoring plates should be referenced to aid rats of sottlcmsnt caussd by the addit.on o. e-w a-aceU a period of one to four weeXs should be set aside fiU applications to allow nor- tir* for monitoring the plates. 4 cantly higher and a much m b« appropriate. V ' •'' 'I -V' ■■■■ >5>ViJ >■/.m '•If*'* 9< , 'r4:^'^yr-:C £.>fS.?Yw,ie.-‘‘•V - ’ -h. V A 1 * 'T^ ' * w t*- V • ;v .: H • . % V * ;alSy-T.-V.« .>• '4.. . •> '!r. '»*n ■;. *t' ' > '5i 3 > ri im ’ilrti i fft fiin'i irri^'^i n'-ilHff r*‘'ti'45-' *. ■ •«*'ifi^-.p^»'<■ -- J !' 7J-157 ^«rk Construction 'mk- S«rvlc«>s perform*id by the <j»ot **-*•'•*•' s;;; .^d^"u «at«u; “;;;.U;,_ sn;:u^.r^“ wir"rU"y.*i ‘4r::::.'.: ♦-m • * ^ •‘•’ff ' *y It ia n pleasure per£or.Bln«j ♦^#*« •• * • hav»* any questions regardin'? ud your convenience* .'5 %.% '■ mm A-?V. WXC/JJC:gac Attachment: -;' liiii ti&i‘^;^:V,'' iV. •-■ ■■. a?*.’-. / B§f^wmmm T -•» vlf'?:•;. :'^ V \-' , ‘'•i *'■*;•• ■ •• ■;,W f. <»• V iS§': '£tW-,. ■V'-- V'^.. .* >i<. „vj,rryOW^»> {. Wii^ 937 ;OCt . Ot ;ion time you tact M % 4 ;‘f > -f 4, - ' v.rH , *► ♦ V' j1 'r’T V* / »,/ 1 V . •-.W»^?vv •- . ‘V*.>‘i:i:' - ‘ '3 r^.‘ : V • .Jf ■ ill. -.* il >*'— L - i J’*'*-'' • ‘ -■.. * .•» . Yv * ‘ v'- •V • *> . J» • .‘^1 ■•1 •'- . . ■ ‘.< ■% 41 ■*f.. ■>x•%* Kr*5u:^^ ^^^ vv- ■' •'/*>: t.’.* c [•■-.‘n.*^ .-i. "W mii i . mp'*':2 ? V -. r w^'7^2:-: /"■ '.<'>'-4 •* ' *i ^ -'• \ , •li^ V w»v*4,. it. * / : t.' I i > , . * py '/.V '1 M-^ri q K #-////:/V-*.\ ^ J'* *'m^- 4. y '"O ^ ‘•' lii‘ * ^V 15 •!!t ■•.v ‘• \- - ■^ - >-ii 1.1?« . .m . y / ' >.•>- -. .ri. : * *, * - I 'T 1^ * ♦. ■'■;fe'.' - "'&H\/• ^ 'rt ■ **-■ »n :...ii|l»ig-‘.?i . .. * ;i I\ * n]i ^ r * rrn ^ '‘*:: '• ^.:y - > •• to. ''■‘ !l!.\V"' •■;, M* ,ll- •'•;• . vi^ i' '* . * ’ . f- * V* * ' ' ' t ‘.L-^;,;,:\ , -j‘ '■>- «.-:a- " :, ^ ;a'»‘:• ’ . • !••- ;V.S # A. ■I’: ^« k; ■*■.« %. I \ 1 /p-"-\ .-p V/ .'■- 'f; 5&“'" /V^‘. • ^ •, •-< «! U '. . .^ 'ir-.. '■^’5 A r«i .•■ w;I/' C.tNI • » A, ^ ' . :'y2' ♦ * • •." ■ .• •a ^ - • ► .-•'ri* ' :. • •■ V-; •;:• .:•. ■■i-v;--''-' '"f*:.... fciV• ♦ */>•■• A. 4,'.V*7 0 -i-'-A *; •4T> U^«y ■ :- B fMi t^‘w im ft' v*>- A' # ■ ^*. ■r v/r^ ■ ‘^:- -iW •■ t-'M^ ■ at \'Y^S>* ■-!'* -afe: ..■■■ p r^j*.' W-'%r.- ir^- V-»'‘ •-O'-*-. ;/V'«•••? ? ! 6 -7,:^..: ■Jf.' ..'IV.-*'- ■•'♦-^••V.- .:..i. ■ -. .v^.- : . ; ■ . ..* •; ’■:^- t W ■ M:-SSSS r/.\; j A m mmy ^mm l*p-' I^ikl ■ ?•■' / 'V'- ■■' ^:y^Ty Xx.■/' ''s'*’..c '-^■;0'v.' •;/ , vf' :'o';«■^«•■' p- r '?t*«^rro •f ♦ « • S^sS^.r^v''..'": 'i - .!iSe ;r ^.'4 .’S.. .u -* f WM ji-RM m 'S .\4*V% I53!:*i!^ & f=rr *, > ■ ** ■ . . .-•rR,' - ..*• i • ^ • ' ^y • Sr ^ • .Ur- *•■ .-, •/ ' Wo«l ■• . ■*“ ./ -*i y - r ^•*a^t*^' A -•^ • 1'fWe • • fi r% . • •• y , ‘ 't- , , ; ■ • •*/,. '■■S! i/* r*r> • -r' T‘/- V w cn i ■-■ •; " • < • . ♦» 1>A» j. j4K»li’... I A • a •• I >• • •■ > 4 ‘ .*■ • f ! i.. ‘ r i ■■ -'M^iv-i"' •'/ • •» I •* *«4 f/ .. , iM". -t-V\ . ' f/.'ki.-* •. » a • . • > A -.V •> • >,TT' •ri**; •,4s»vy ' 4'?^. 9) > "■*-., '■■■ 4 •’ ‘ a' ••'. ' ■6#i ■'■<.•>.,V'.v' • • •J <Tm <'•I-s V'-^'': *' "’ii. f rf.-^. &• ■• " ■*■’i>*,>^ 'IT V —'A^'l'>> yl»^tV1 «5* *.*•/>.3^*1#.5.-«!*/•» — • ^ ^ ' .», • t *9.'^ t4^:-Kr:v . ^ •** ^E#ii •.!» -J mm - *.y^‘ ’*>/ V. r*^ss'i /r w «, •:. V,'., , • v'^t! ’ r *^\-V< -^ '■*»■ »i y fcitiC City of OROrVO /^7- ^y-S-y -r , W-* '■-*T^:nTv* ;b?i RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2526 iisX'iifd '.vy',-:.-,x i&W';.** i i- > V^:^.-?V;-.r- A R2S0L0TI0H GRANTING RENEWAL CONDITIONAL DSE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 & PILE #1310 5 388 M>nn *V» ysUffSSfia. ccpurr i^- L •■ "!»? Zitl m • . L'. - - WHEREAS, Howard F. Eisinger (hereinafter "the applicant”) is the o%mer of the property located at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as .follows: rv‘>.' '( PID: 32-118-23 14 0002 Section 32, Township 118, Range 23, commencing at a point in the East line of Government Lot 1 distance 393.24 feet South along said line from the South line of State Highway No. 12 thence at right angles West from said East line 418 feet thence at right angles North 393.02 feet to South line of highway thence West along said highv»ay line to Vest line of said Lot 1 thence South along said west line to Northerly mm %_^ • line of Great Northern Railroad right-of-way thence Southeasterly vi/Vmm along said right-of-way line to East line of Lot 1 thence North to beginning (hereinafter "property"); and h ■vj.r;m ■ •V .'w ^ WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a renewal conditional use permit to permit the filling of 100,000 cubic yards of clean fill over a former dut«p site of approximately 12 acres in area per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 and 20. The fill materials shall be placed such that the average height is maintained at 5’. Pilling shall take place 35* in from the adjacent wetlands at the 972 elevation. NOW, THEREPORB, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, •Jr. Minnesota: FINDINGS .. 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning Pile 11310.li :jtv 2. Tho property is located in the RR-lB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. 3. On June 8, 1937, the Omno Council approved application 11103 granting a permit to tho applicant to allow the filling project per the conditions set forth in Kesoluuion #2197. 4. The applicant proposes no charges from the original application with the renewal application (#1310) currently under consideration by tha Council. it* I Page 1 of 5 ♦.»' r . f Li.1^ t- . /* ^ m • P-*mm ‘'tfi **^\^ mmm **^ XM ■ ^ •JC pp ^ «r • • .1t'?vH,'vi tipm City of OJlOrVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2526_________ 5. On August 15, 1988 and October 3, 1988, the Orono Planning Commiaaion reviewed the application as proposed and recommended unanimous approval of the application based on the following findingsx / i *li j y W- A) The current proposal will have no negative impact on the surrouding wetlands or intersecting drainageway. yrr^-:M B) Once again, the adjacent property owners have been advised of the applicant's proposal and none have voiced objection or submitted written opposition to the City. •> i % »'**• c •V-: ;. < ’ C) The application as modified by the Planning Commir.sion will not bo detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or vacinity. improvemen ts in the miB '•sm D) Braun Engineering, in a letter dated May 28, 1987, has opined as follows regarding the placement of approximately 10n,000 cubic yards of fill over a former dump site: the .it IS our opinion that the addition of 5' of fill area presents a very slight risk of embankment failure." ■ H ■■ 6. The City Council has considered this renewal application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the community. l : ■ r:i : 1. The City Council finds that granting a renewal conditional use permit to allow ;.he filling of 100,000 cubic yards of clean fill within the area as defined by the Orono staff# will not be detrimental to the health# safety or general welfare of the public# would not adversely affect light# air nor pose a fire haxard or other danger to neighboring properties# nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of tdie City. COMCLBSIOHS, ORD83t AND CONDITIONS ArV Based upon one or moro of the above findings, th^o Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use pennit per Municipal Zoning C^e Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19 s 20 to permit the placing of 100,000 cubic yards of fill within an area approved by the Orono staff, subject to tne folloiring conditlcnsx > .T.' aV r 4 RaslKISr. wm w f- r jwmmm mm. i \^4 A-rJ *• * ' %.-v: n^y msn ,^,-i V 1 ■/I I 1 i ,<» ^’>. * iM44''i UJ*. i?%j •I- .«^:i iVrz: [br « ; -v:i . ’ - •«: V’-'-\;>' ,„RjgS'' ’•-^ .''■•.•>>= y»>f«■:.'. ■ y»>f« '•\8At ’i?' .. v'?.^*‘.';N:» '•■■Vv^|f. 4..... ‘v; it?. fS City of OROrVO Y'i;-^ l.'j ‘ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 2526NO. ft;. • 1. Prior to the hauling of fill to the site, applicant's agent must submit the following;the applicant or ■'tv-: A) B) Six cross sections of existing topography. Pinal grading and erosion plan designaten«; t''- followingj i. Side slopes 5:1 ratio; ii. 1% slope to be maintained within inner fill area; ^ -t.:£m jtr iti. Silt fence installed 30-35' from wetland at 972 elevation - no land alterations allowed within 26' of wetland; mmavji C) Executed developer's agreement and aoprooriate security to ensure final grading and seeding if 'fill oroject is not completed. ^ - I a 2. Pill shall not exceed allowed amount of ICO^OCO cubic yards. Average height of fill to be maintained at 5'. Side slopes to be graded and seeded periodically during the course of the project. The Orono staff is to advise applicant or applicant's agent when seedinc is to be conducted. :.-y-ri : 3» Park Construction shall be responsible for i.uvislng the City of the monthly schedule of hauling activities so that staff can arrange an inspection schedule for the month. Prior to hauling any fill to the site. Park Construction must arrange for a pre-construction meeting with the Orono staff to review all final submittals and tentative hauling schedule. The City will ask that a representative of its Police Department be present at the pre-construction meeting to advise of any special traffic/safety concerns during the hauling process M ^ >7< r'- •Mr 4. Bauling activities shall not be conducted during the following time periods: 6:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. 4v00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. :->w^ f- 3.' 'f* ;V Iv.- City of OHOi^’O RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. NO. 2526_________ it' .\nm li»-' 5. Park Construction shall cease all hauling to the site upon Qvidence of shearing and/or o*her signs of Instability created by filling over the former dump site. Applicant shall not proceed with haulino until the City Engineer has had adequate time to review the evidcrice and O'ub.mit a written report to the Council for their review and action. If Council determines that it is in the public interest to cease all hauling to the site, this conditional use peirmlt shall be terminated immediately and the applicant shall complete the final ^fading and seeding of the entire disturbed area. 6. Apolicant is responsible for up-dating all previous permits Issued by the' Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Hennepin County Department cf Environment and Ihigineerlng, and M.C.W'.D. 7. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owner, but are permissive only and the filling of the site must have commenced within one year of the date of Council approval or the special conditi'~ns of f-is resolution will expire on that date (October 24, -’v 8. Violation of or non-conpliancc with a: y of the terms and condi tions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 9. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 24th day of October 1988 m ATTEST: V.-. C.lty Clerk W>..\ 1.) V- James R. Grabek, Mayor Vv p> ./ jjf/j .c .t v.v^ 7 .JM A \i r- f 4 • t » ,v^ iM>'v ’I Vr i' - * y*J " • ,:v V, M R — 1 O — P 2 T LI E 1 Cl : -4 3 B O N E Sr T R O O ^ S: S: O C: I A T E S: L F' . Gi. '; i/|j Bonestroc rm Rosene And&rllk& |\^| Assodates Srtgfnttrs & Architects :v- Oa 0. te^a.-ac, ».f. C i/VX*u», *f *<j(*r<n L. iasm. #x licnifl i. Hir.-m »,f, cmvi I. C m m. T>»T4» I. MC)«t, «. Doom c SsrHiVStn. »j. feun M. tMm. CX a feife March JO, 3992 Xet'A 3M«t Hi, *ru/3 U'. A»ow. )»,i. Jro' A. ttvaan. >i. Mw» 4 Ktnun. *S O l*a»* Pt. %«rtC tUUM.Af.A Hb-v «j a . lavac HI. C. lur^aw. A|. Vf *. l-w. U r iMmavr flf. ^ Ptsfvnf, Al. lAarji w h'.tftax hi. C P.: « ■« I. n /ir-TiVCi • .A/iarw». A| ^ I. ««<, Hf. Trsri) 7 A^VI HI OWfT i ISiTAar. HI A(|.'» A. Stq rg X C*r-«t »| HI » Xnottm Kia tn m H^.^y C*<v H *T4nar* Hi. . .. ' Hijrurt A (A. 'V’^1 Iru^ A<CH ••'y 0 Hrsxr. Hg Cr»»0 CWfA HI. Otry w Ma.<r\ Hg <»«n i vtMvt Hf n»Hi H A a H| CH.AM A iiiiidn *AWi» jmm. »| C H^*^Cl»^rl|l HI AjiCinM Ction Qiy of Orono Box 66 Cr>-stal Bfiy, MN 55323 % -^>iv A' -V'-- -.>^, y \\ " .-■ ■>.•^1 Attn: Jeanne Mafausth vV • . ■ • • ■^•4 ■’ ; a : . ' Howard Eisingcr CondilionaJ Use Permit Application il^V22 Our File a V o. 139-1722 r- ■• ■ r.. Dear Jeanne, isssfij"," r. ».leveJ the site area. The additionc' matertEj 'un m ^^ to unifcntily instaUsd over the entire fill area Seed reVArli?'^ ^ Imaediatdy to help prevent erosion. ““ rei.oration ci the site should be completed 11 If we may be of any further assistance, please ccntaci me. Yours very truly, ANDERLJK & ASSOCIATES,r/M'v^u'X V^' Harlan M. Olson HMO.'ii •A'. i-f 1^- -4,t : Ai pipli m.m . ■-■A ' V •* i. - t'tJElUd 4'‘.. •y * lir; y.- V1: r>-: ^.^59.cor I^■^v -rtlifl AV iifiiiiiiiiiiJlfciiiftiliittyi ;.i> r ‘maiiii i y.:. A . /V t 11310 HOWARD P. BISINGER 3245 WAYZA^IA OOHUSVARO RENEWAL CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT \ PUBLIC HEARING 7:25 P.M. - 7:42 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were ^ noted. - ■ T. i -^v The—applicant was present for this matter. Kelley stated that he was not in favor of recommending approval of this matter. He was "concerned with the increased traffic on Highway 12 due to the trucks hauling the fill to Mr. Eisinger's property, especially during school hours. If approved, he would like time restrictions placed on the hauling to correspond with peak school traffic. Kelley's other concern was the dirt left behind by these trucks. Cohen inquired as to the length of time the hauling would take. Kelley stated that it seemed as though Mr. Eisinger had already had a significant amount of time to complete this project. Mabusth explained that the permit was issued in June, 1987 and expired in June, 1980. Mr. Eisinger had appeared before the City Council to get an extension of the permit until October, but then discovered that he would need to renew the permit because the October deadline would not be sufficient. Brown asked what had caused the delay in the project. Mabusth explained that Mr. Eisinger had difficulty in obtaining the fill. Bellows asked whether Mr. Eisinger had j guarantee that he would be supplied with the quantity of fill he had requested. Sne wanted to see the establishment of guidelines for staff on limitations that deposited soil can remain in an un listurbed state. Mabusth stated that a determination would ^'ave to be made as to how long it would take to haul 100,000 cubic yards of fill. Kelley suggested tabling the matter until more information could be provided. Johnson disagreed, stating that this matter had been before the City for nearly two years. He would like to see it t "olved so the work can begin. The benefits of having the dumpsite capped-off and the drainage directed away from it have already bee.n shown. Johnson stated that the Watershed District would be issuing a grading permit and would specify some guidelines as to erosion control and seeding. Mabusth stated that her real concern involved the issue of ho*» long the fill could remain ungraded and unseeaed. Kelley asked if they could delay making a recommendation for another month. Mabusth asked Mr. Eisinger for his opinion on this. Mr. Eisinger stated that he would like to see this matter resolved as soon as possible. Mabus:h stated that staff and the Planning Commission need to know the length of time the fill can reamin unseeded and how steady the supply of fill will be. Cohen asked when applicant anticipated beginning this project. Mr. Eisinger stated that he anticipated starting in October. Kelley stated that the Police Department should be notified that 4,000 tandem trucks would be hauling fill prior to the L k - •* V . ' ^Aj L*' * I I •* * ......... .'V** ./ j v ♦H Ifc'i::. \V/!1 '' ’/■! ''•5 ^ .*■='■ '.VV . V *' V .. Hi •‘v'*‘ ;-r ;v- fk'f i •> fr >■ '1 ■*v ■:.V m -.n::*v m i.i &.■ rn-.L- 't. A f, \ : ^ •;.: HINDTES OP THE PIANNIKG COMMISSION MKETINC HELD ACCOST 15, 1988 ZONING PILE #1310 CONTIHDBD project beginning. Mr. Eisinger stated that he did not think traffic would be a problem. Kelley stated that there should be additional signage on Highway 12, and/or perhops an additional passing lane installed. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to table #1310. .Motion, Ayes»5, Johnson»Nay. Motion passed. #1321 TOM HAISLET 950 OLD CRySTAL BAY ROAD NORTH CLASS III PRELIMINARY SOBDIVISION PODLIC HEAP.IKG 7:45 P.M. - fl;00 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of .Mailing were noted. Applicant was present fcr this matter. Applicant explained that the School District could not do anything further with regard to purchasing the parcel as a whole. In order for the School District to acquire this property, it was necessary to break the parcel into four lots which could be acquir-'d one lot at a time. It is their intention to purchase Lot A this year and purchase the remaining Lots before the contract expired. Other municipalities have done "an administrative split", which means the parcel is not really subdivided in l.ig!/t of it eventually being purchased as a whole. Kelley aaked why applicant did not proceed in this manner. Mabuath explained that the Schcol District could not create any kind of a lease or contract to transfer land unless it was done through a division, per Oronc subdivision regulations. Haisiot noted the School District could not enter into a longterm investment, which would be required if the parcel was purchased as a whole, but rather must be able to liquidate the property quic.kly should the School District r'-quire any additional funds. Cohen asked applica.nt what would happen should the School District not purchase the property. Bellows stated that she would be leary to grant the School District this type of a subdivision, when they had recently failed to follow through on a similar matter. Mr. Haislet said that the School District would he in default of the contract as statetd if tney should fail to fully comply. Cohen asked whether the purchase agreement pertained to the entire parcel. Mr. Haislet said that the purchase agreement required that the first lot be sold to the School District, and the remaining Lots be leased at a set price and acquired at a time when the School District had the funding available. Cohen wanted to see the purchase agreement. Applicant stated that the purchase agreement Is being negotiated between the attorneys for the sellers and the School District. Mi, 4. 5 L. > ' ' I.'V/ Vt* .*• . t4 M ? -V I m' tel V li. k' i m >,r i Vv v‘- 'i A ■y< ■ S-. i-* .{ i ®3SfS- P^V>5 i f ••’^* «sfii r.' ^•:'I^P :.. ^^isium :.^V«A''-''V' SS'^>;1:V te-, ;r»>'-1: - ’ iCniDTSS 05 RECUIAJl OSO!JO COOIiCIL nZSTIHG OC70VSR 24,I9S8 ZCWIHC ADSUaiSTSATOR’S RJSPORT: I9'«0 NARO rSSSZLL 3411 NATZSTQWII RGAO VARIAOCS MAyor Grab«)c explained that dua to an illness, the applicant had ce<raestcd that this itea be tabled. It vas aoved by Mayor Crabek, seconded by Councilaeaber Callunan, to table this item until the applicant can be present to address the Council. Motion, Ayes-S, Nays«0, Motion passed. f 11309 CS3ALD MBLS0!f 1C29 Bomi'S Pox:rr roao A?TS3l-T2n-?ACT CCMDITIOMAL DSB PKR.HITAAR1AHC2 2ESCiCmC3 92534 Hr. and .Mrs. Nelson wcro present for this matter It was explained by City Adainiatrator Sernhardson that this application involved a conditional use permit and variance for a pond that had been constrvicted within the 0-75* tone of the Nelson property. The pond has been underlain with plastic, and the swale and landscaping that was done around the pend are underlain with fabric. The purpose of the pond is to resolve an ongoing drainage problem. The Planning Conmission had recomnended that tho plastic under the pond and t!>c crushed rock/wood chips with underlying fabric remain. The fabric under tho landscaping in the lakeshore yard should be removed. Mr. snd .Mrs. Nelson had no questions ccacorning this application and stated that they were In full agreement with the roccranendations and conditions of the Planning Concnissicn. It was moved Counci looaber Nettles, seconded by Councllmember Callaiiat. to adopt Resolution 12534. Motion, Ayea-5, Naya-0, Motion passed. 4131? . B7BI3IGS& 3245 .70Z2;VXR SOULZVARO coaemoFM. os* psrmit iuBoicnoa 47526 . City Adainifltrat cr Bernhardson infor:red the Mayor and CounciImombers that Mr. Eisinger was seeking a renewal of * conditional use permit to place 100,000 cubic yards of fill on his property. This had been reviewed twice by the Planning Coanission. It was their recommendation that three issues be coniiidered with the approval ol‘ this application, the first Involves the amount of time the fill will be allowed to resiaiB in a disturbed state? the aeconc involves tine llmitatlono pertaining to tho actual hauling of tho fill; and the third isaoc involves working with the orom? Police Department on safety end traffic precautions. TBjaSBBM 4- M vr h WSt? 'h*:im m mm. m »*r. 'm i - ■'t bS^ ismsm K^-i i 4 3PI PW fr'/.,%’>-**» k-'-Lm,-'.;...d m i-y:-Y^ ;.• V.' .--- ■,r:. m:-. ■i^‘ ‘K.f X? i>- V-,-. ' \ . ‘S-i^rnM^km MIH0T2S O? R2CCLAR CH0»0 COtTOCIL M22TINC OCTOaKR 24,1988 ZOSISG TILS 41310-EISIMCZR CONTIHU2D Councilaeober Goercen auked if a tine Unit vould be specified as to how long the project can take to coaplete. Zoning Administrator Mabusth replied that a tine liait will not be placed on this project because the availability of the fill will vary. Goetten asked whether the City Staff would be monitoring the project froa beginning to end. Mabusth assured her that they would. The City Engineer had set out recomaended tiaei. for seeding the fill and the City would be contacting Hr. Sisinger at those tines. This would prevent the fill from staying in a disturbed state for an undetermined amount of time. Counciiraember Goetten asked Mr. Eisinger when he anticipated beginning the project. Mr. Eisinger said that he could not determine that at this point. It was moved by Counci liaember Goetten, secondeo by CounciImember Nettles, to adop* Resolution 52526. Motion, Ayos«5, Nays«0, Motion passed. 51311 JOHH 8 SDSA3 PtTPhY 1975 PAC2IUISS3 POINT i vW5 VAaXAHCES nEso.wrno!i 92527 Mr. and Mrs. Purdy were prjsent for this matter. City Administrator Sernhardsoa explained that the PurdVi. were requesting variances to put an addition on their home. They had been before the Planning Commission and City Council back in 1935 with an application and more recently were asking approval for a revision to their 1986 plan. The revision included a 3~season porch that encroached into the 0-75* zone and the application was denied. T.te Purdys have since revised that plan and were now proposing to add on to the "outh side off the house. This addition would encroach no closer to the lakeshore than the existing house. The hardcover percentages for the 0-75* and 75-250' zones are in line with the application that was approved back in 1385. The only issue that had not been addressed was a potential garage addition which was included in the 1985 plan. The Planning Commission has recoBusended approval of this application. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Caffron clarified that the haracover calculations did include the addition of the garage. However, a side setback variance would be required if the Purdys decided to add the garage. CounciImember Goetten asked tne Purdys if they had any caediate plans to build a garage. .Hr. Purdy indicated that they d no such* plans within the next year. It was moved by CounciImember Gostten, seconded by :unciImember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2527, approving the kyi>-fr-yy: *'m s- f .... pat <>#%—»» <, ^ «>A .JhA, -' *:5 mu >_i: t-; V Bones troo Rosene Anderllk & Associates Englneen & A/chJtects OnJ G iwrtriiiou |ruwr«i Vi •u»0^>* M*y>^ C A/o#»«i« •rjuivtf A r| I f*( j^r»i*i C C*tun ^1 • Cuu* I ^1 irr^#* A |r«fV^a Vi ^««« ^1 C a ^wkU C fu»4^«*«a ^1 J»«'f A ItA^OufV VAM* A Marw^ '♦U • *fni f I «.vCir*t i ^1 £;#•«) O ^1 w f f C ^1 n0»^ t ia «m»^ n W«A A tAhrAann. ft U a « f •Oi'V A0M«1 w A I A nVOP^M f A/«gMi. ^f Hu»4r« A UnlOML A| C*WAVk A twnMA !»,> M fTAAlAMy MAUA M OlMM Wm»« III (fetvaA VlAt A Sr« /V August 31• 1968 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay. HU 35323 Attni Ms* Joanns Habusth Rsi Fils Mo. 139-1310 Hovard Eisingsr Doer Jsanns, Tbs propossd fila^jig on the Howard Eisingsr propvrty at 3245 Vayzata Boulevard will be conplsted over a one year time period. Restoration of the site is a concern because of the length of tine over which the work will be done. Ve would recocHieod that unfinished side slopes be graded and seeded periodi cally during the course of the project. The top of the fill area should be graded and leaded when the finish elevation is reached. The feeding should be conpleted on or about the 15th day of the month of Miy» June, September, October and Movenber. if any filling work has been done. This will help prevent erosion of the site during the construction operations. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BOKESTROO, ROSCME, /JirLuLlX & ASSdClAfiS, IHC. r'^G1.& R. Cook CRCiU 'm r • 'fai >■ m . . . -Tf •rl^; '•’■'I '•All ■" . Wl ' *4 .. 0> ' V] -i: -V 2335 Wen mgfMoy 36 • St. Pwf. Mlrmesou SS!t3 • 612-636-4600 r.-*. ^v/:» *■'w*WV!^. p. ‘ V - -'f- ^ f' f. ^;‘:4f*!-^.V J,'/' ■ >• ‘fiid •A :.v « J»t *^'Vt-‘ ■ . ■f«' Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator 9-V. ♦ ♦ f * Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator March 6, 1992 i ■i #1723 Patricia C. and William Dickey, 2645 Watertown Rd Conditional Use Permit/Variances - Public Hearing L*?.'4 Zoning District:: RR-IB, Rural residential Total area = 65.9 acres Pertinent Ordinances 1. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C) (2) - Variance to total allowed area for accessory structures. a,:,Properties = 9+ acres Allowed = 6,000 s.f. Existing »= 14,978 s.f. Proposed « 15,462 s.f. (additional 484 s.f. of structure for open-ended addition to existing garage — review Exhibit J) Variance *=» 9,462 s.f. Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 - Height variance required for privacy fence in front/street yard. PM mMs. fe:. Allowed « 3' 6” Existing » 6* to 8' Variance » 4' 6” Section 10.28, Subdivision 3 (A) a.Wm"-m -.'-is Conditional use permit required for temporary greenhouse installed during summer months of the year. b.Conditional use permit required for guest house/non rental residential unit .> 4l» Required as a result of legal combina ion of properties applied for on February 24, 1992. List of Exhibits A-1-2 - Application B - Applicants Addendum C - Property Owners List D - Plat Map E - Legal Combination F - Guenthner Addendum G - Brochure H - Site Plan - Crop Area/Temporary Greenhouse I - Greenhouse Specs J - Survey of Property K • Site Plan - Location of Fence L - Letter to Applicant % ■ ' U'a vn rfirgk 1 1 dm \- /T. t - mt w :Z§ m. .^: „:;V . P'S'- Zoning File # 1723 March 6, 1992 Page 2 Description of Request for Variances The first part of the variance application deals with a need for a variance co the allowed total area for accessory structures on this property that contains over 65 acres in area. Refer to the facts noted above. The 22' x 22' addition to the existing garage that serves the residence structure was constructed without the benefit of a permit review. As structure is open- ended and refered to as lean-to by applicant, Mr. Dickey assumed that a building permit was not necessary for this type of structure. If the property was not legally combined, a setback variance would have been required. Review Exhibit J. Note structure intersects west lot line of Tract A, RLS 1089. With the legal combination the setback variance is no longer required but a variance to the total allowed area for accessory structures is required. The increase in height referenced in Mrs. Dickey's letter occured during the time of the Golden View Drive construction and soon followed by the residential construction. The Dickey's have provided photos of the fence as it existed on the property in earlier years and will be presented for Planning Commission's review. Mrs. Dickey's addendum notes the history of the fencing, the need for the alteration for an increase in height and the hardships. For members who will ask the customary question, "Why is the City dealing with the issue of the fence height at this time?", staff would refer you to the earlier letters sent to the applicant. Exhibit L, and also that this matter was first noted to the staff by at least two members of the Commission. If the variance for the addition to the detached garage is approved, staff would ask that you condition approval on applicants obtaining a penalty building permit for the unauthorized construction. At this time applicant may consider adding doors to the 3-sided structure. Non-Rental/Gaest House Unit Applicant was asked to file a conditional use permit for the second residential unit when the legal combination was applied for on February 24th. The structure is older and was probably part of the former farm homestead. The structure has been maintained by the Dickey's. T'c is staff's understanding that their daughter resides in the residence. Applicants understand completely that the structure can never be rented in its current status. If the applicants plan to either rent or sell this structure in the future, there is adequate area to support the 2- acre required area standard. Your approval of this conditional use permit must be conditioned on the structure never being offered for rent. ! A hi '■'i • : -i VTWTT'*' .■V -rr-y ZoniruT File # 1723 March 6, 1992 Page 3 Tenqporary Greenhouse l-r. """t ■.J-- ■.' Please review Exhibits F, G, H and I. Mr. Guenthner proposes the leasing of approximately 5 acres of land from the Dickey's for the raising of organic fresh vegetables to be sold to a variety of outlets including individual households (estimated at 120), natural food co-op, and restaurants. Note the conditional use permit is required for only the temporary greenhouse structure. The crop use at 5 acres does not require a conditional use permit. The temporary greenhouse is proposed at M X 100' in area at a 10' maximum height and will be used from A M A M A. « A % # . March 15 through June 15. Applicant notes in his addendum that he seeks approval for a one year conditional use permit. Staff would suggest that a conditional use permit be granted for the temporary greenhouse without the need for applicant to reapply each year. Applicant need only apply for a conditional use permit if changes in the operation are proposed. A conditional use permit would approve the proposed level of use, size and location of greenhouse and should also specify that crops will not be sold on site. Options of Action 1.Variances for height of fence and total area of accessory structures. If denied, please refer to the appropriate sections of the code for the necessary finding. If approved, refer to applicants addendum for findings and hardships. Exhibit B, and additional comments of applicant. Pi Conditional use permits for non-rental residential unit and temporary greenhouse. r i. p. If denied, please refer once again to the appropriate sections of the code for the necessary findings. ^7 OR 7-If approved, applicant must be advised that second residential unit may never be rented and conditional use permit for temporary greenhouse is based on proposed level of use. Any change will necessitate the filing of a new conditional use permit. This conditional use permit will run indefinitely until the proposed use at current level is no longer in use- Isv •r • • ^ ■ m 7:7- * \ »i CITY. OF ORONO ~ GENERAL PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,\ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) (5A-- iO • *\t. 00*2- Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT j! ■Name t; Address Phone (home) _Phone (work) -cgaSL"^ CityV-C^ Uice Zip I JP OWNER (if different than applicant) /I Name VV-Address Phone (home) Phone _ _ _ _ City _ _ _ Zip. f-.rH Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commerclal/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration m 150.0 CITY OF ORO^Q FiRAiiCE OFFICE 135020000Q 01 OEH r350200000 ! 01 QEHvom 1350200000 01 QEH 1350200000 .50 K»\m. Grading and filling - designated wetland or flo^^ainl?r/^^. Grading and filling - 101 cu, yd. or more 250.00 Grading, seawall, retaining walls within PRD/PID - see fee schedule 02/24A Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT DSE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application I’orm. Certified Property Oviers List of owners wivh^n '>50‘ (you can obtali this list from HennopA.i County Department of Finance A-603 Governmen* Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete Initials of Clerical Staff: Date_______________ APPLICANT * S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. -V V I ^V'j J l\V' iiri CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION L'V Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance Renewal Variance Pee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) #17 it-'-. PROPERTY INPORHATION Site Address Vc^Ur .V' Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) CA- IH *'2,^ -\~2. Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired ^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _(month/year) I (fd^(do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: y* residential _ _other(specify) Zoning District;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT Phone (home) mi K . Name AKT'Z.ve.lA C.Phone (work) 4"!'^-CC^Z>^ Address; “2.!=A^ kXAt^'gXQcjovjT"^^._ _ City; VA.CG_ _ _ Zip; OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name ^Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: 1 \ 1 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: OM — '"Th’ht P 4-c^eijQiL^ OTTS-u ti.f'u Y»—— VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear _ _ Average Lakeshore Pi,.- • . ", BAk DSHIP/DBSCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS L'. Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements;_ _ _ _ _ J j*,jp ^•,.1^ lA,. rj-u. TV —^V :*■ € .»• • (attach additional sheets if necessary) RlQUXRED SUBMITTALS ' AJ *■. of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date i" order for your application to be considered completes 1. 2. Completed Application Form .■J - _ _^Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center • 348-3271). 3. _Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. _Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8Jj"xll" for reproduction). 5. _ _Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8>f"xll"). 6. _Skecches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8J5"xll”). 7. _Afj an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. _Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that yonr variamce application is not cooiplete if the above infoxnatlon has not been Included. APPLICAHT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and poTTe^t to,^-th^ best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verifica;feloir-^ this ^r^quest. Owner's signaturl _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review eeetings of the Planning ConodLsslon and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. r *•. .3 .’2 1^;. ^ j -'ll. i ’ -4 •liT* ...f- .^-y-—tt- .. ,»• ' ■•'T fe\ ^ •'i'* ' ■■ r* ■ £'■* i^1 .. ..M- •i'>- I?V w- ._ y-r ■ ' ' Patricia Dickey 2645 Watertovm Road Long Lake, MN. 55356 jj ^7 L ® ry ^ i dZi s s 1 i 4 •' >- ‘ V " f Ef'Wje^V;'mm !^#Feb. 24, 1992 Orono city Council m To Whom it may concern, The property that I own at 2645 Watertown Road has a privacy fence on a portion of it that is directly in front of our house and barn. This property was originally purchased by my family in 1957. There was and always has been a fence in the existing location as far back as the Heffelfinger ownership in the late eighteen hundreds along with the next owners the George Case family, the Hollasic family and us. Over the years we have maintained and repaired it on a regular basis to maintain it's integrity and appearance. We have always been a working farm here, and there are machines etc. that have a potential impact on anyone just wandering into our property. The fence has always been to not only maintain privacy but as a safeguard. '' » f:- K- ;'r R-- In the summer of 1987 a housing development was nlaced directly across from our property. If I had been aware of the iiupact that would occur to my residence I most surely would have attended the meetings and stated my objections. The prevailing wind pattern that comes into our home and property comes directly across the line that the homes were built on. As a result of these wind patterns during the contruction all the debries, dust and noise came directly into our home. The road was placed so that as the people turned out of it, the lights rack across our entire home and in all our front windows. The swimming pool, our yard, and windows were covered directly with dirt for the first year of construction. ST i V -i ‘ - . >■« mmm -1 till IIA glfrr 1 vlf .1 '■'.1 K ''irwT. ’ c'« ••ft «» V ■r 'J J • • • ^ ‘ \ *'r • ^ / O’ f) ■2(J-y7 l' : We also discovered, to our dismay, that the smoke and chimmney smell coming from the homes in a storm or any high winds, again came directly into our home and still does. In an to effort to deflect the impact, we constructed a higher fence addition to the existing one that was here to divert the wind and debris much like the truck deflectors you see on large semis. The fence did work. t-,.m We were contacted by the city of Orono and told our fence did not comply with city regulations. In an effort to be good neighbors we took the addition we made to the existing fence down which in turn returned the old fence to it's original form and size. We are now being told that we need a variance for the old fence which has again been on this property in some form since the late eighteen hundreds. I sincerely wish that we jould hav^e left the deflictor portion up as it did help with the nusiance we now have to live with. I felt that I did not want to cause any trouble for anyone. The fence is stained to match the bark of trees and fits directly into the landscape with the existing trees which have grown up around it for over 100 years. mi I respectively request that the varience be granted. ■ 'f Yours truly, 'f ■ ’ - . . -- - - - r* ui 9 o o w ^ o > 0 9K5*|3^ sss- ! fvi m ^ ^ O M 99 r"2 H o n o I 2 Q O O at ^ -n n w 2 *»iM M -< M C9 jin » z z ^ ^ ® ^ z! ^U4 ^ > Ovn 99 r- o -»-%<•. ..- i . ._•'« -•.' » • 'ii.. •-••:■ V-'- .99 ;;l^m 9 90o r- >. * 'r -v V .-;iK;.,:;. ■ • .i. -T* ’ . t • *•ri . ■■> .4 :T > ■ •;.••. -*1 vV C in 90 c. e ui Q M M O 9Z n z o R X X in _cSi^^a 5 9 ? M in fti C- JX X M ^ X m > 9 ^99 n.-< »• 2 C. 9 Ui 99 m app^-l^ in X in >_ w O 9 •• O 0 9 9o 9 in ui 9 9 '"='%l85 55?E5^-------> ftl Wm . Z ^ in o in 9 in 9 4^ < W M m o ZO O M 9 9^995 5 z in 95c M m m SM ^^iri5 fO f- m M in > X 99 m 9 X ^ 9 > • 9 9 9 rv> X M M M inin U4in 9 9 9 0 X m m M ui 0 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Oo ii a X X M M 9 9 7» • z M X (- o 9 P M M 0 9 < fv> 9 O O N o rn v4 > •• 9 Ui H m X _ Ui > _ M X I zS5o»E: 2 -< o 0 9 ji rj 9 o I pig§»cJ o _ o . cs$m o Ui Ui 9 ni 9 M 9 fy H Z < O Ui ■—. , '■'V. ' /.' .. .»■ ’* 4* » \ in 9 in o Uiin9 §® 9^ * ' ft ^ V if - V ir" •. •,- » -■ . *jr- ' J ♦>♦••„• ..■' V ■ ■': ,■ > ... ^ . ■• ■•• ■ .■. '/ ' i "W--4 *1 V ’-• i? •• . . :r a. *. • ' •. , - » • ■%-!.; i »• ‘ i ■* •. »-•■. ■ ,■ i ■ ■ *> ' f - 'K ' •'-c .If* • w- ••> • •.% : ' - - *" • 'Z. \ Q > 9 9 Ui o M ► ••■- -t . m ♦•■ - -'i . r"* ■ - ■■ %t..; y iir'iiiifttiiii'iiiii^'”*^-^-~^ '-~asgs ^2 g q» .,■•>• '•*■ss«? ^|232s *s9a^ i!s ' .- -• in 9 > > in o Ui in9 9 M 3-*M > 5?^ O O Ui r- 9 H H o g §in X X o m m o ?®®8oO C- C. 9 I 9 ?l! ^ O M -<-<-< r- 9 o m o I H 9 9 in 9 in ► Ui -<in n Ui m 9 H -< rsi > 9 M r- H > o r* o 9 ? r- IM 9 9 o ^ Q rvi m m o 9 2 in > 9 ^ 9 9 IMO r* r- in Q Jc mm M m n 2 Z O M5l5sr5u;m o Ui ^ — in 9 Ui »in < ^ 9 a 3^J599 r- o 9 S < 3 9 '!:• w»»-'' t' *> -, . • i - ’V. . A ^ * .:• m 9 < <£ 1 'i 'ii ■; ;;; jki • , • ^ ^ A •• .r-^- -y .j. .... ■ . .1 • r .... ■ v.yJ.•wj ' ;•'”.‘il•.^.■ ■ ■’.'; •'■' ' V-'' • ■ " ■ .•^•c." * ■»> •• fc - j., ^ -•.. . * .»»•_, •-fc.- .■.'.« V v>—- * V -- . h' ■ ‘ ' rj-:^ ir?C.r. - * r .■ « ' f • .^ • ^», »^* 1-x. . t»* .. ^ . «• i O C ! ^•■’• .vr O rf-f -*PV9 ss " '•’* ’• *, ^ “r-' •'''V •k. ♦ •• 1 ♦ - # ^ ^ ^...,.- .. >» i ... «^. ir..» 1^ .. .v,.:.‘ *4'•v.g^r.v. r* Z Z o Vi ' . - r^ Ji < <’o vi ^ -.or BS h ^a S ^ C ^A ;■ r - ^ , 2 2 * 2 « P ^ a ..,-U '-....V- CS I ' •■ ■ £ ?? H H I ■ •.- ' 0^' ''•’ *■. '-r.' k /1'^ • ’ * .,4'.. ..^" ', 8 S 8 ■'^,U '•^■■ *■ . . . • ♦ • >fv ... J' ^ • *" ■ ♦.» ' • ^ :. S, •<■•.-. r‘- -s,.' V V.-- . .'.-i < t * ■•» ' ' ' * ■ y " ■ - - :;*■>/ ■ ■«^'' Z.'.- • r- Z Z o w Q VI M M rv> (» JE C5 r* r- VI C) o r- f- » M M o Vi Sj sS$5 M'i- m fn g m gc M 7S VI '.^.I n -o > Si ■- n . * -<.r• /• ■ •. 'i' ‘ ^ •# •,» ^.. .i: .V. - W.* ■ -•^r'^Msh- • r* fo Z 0) o VIVI M >Q VI R > o Oi JE 0 r- -< o iip.i ‘ r »I*’ ^ A ■8 >•I > r- w H X b ^ S M 3 C 3n ® H W O w r* rj C C O VI m m r» 9 o X X O VI m m Vi •< - > > 0 Z H X X H I 2 Q H H m M X M M X VISitVt X ►in o c ^ -4 H O Vi M 00Q ►- M O M VI r- f- X VI > r- < ► I mSc-r-jg 0 r* I n r- f# w •< ^ SS3*§S H X X ^ S > > m fM Vi r* n m X VI 5g"-| i ffi m c. ► X M X > 0S in H g ^ p»t si: 515*§s I^ H r- M m < n r* Z M X m M > 0 0 H Im M X w .4.*.' 1 r: ‘4 > «■ ' • 1 ;r -^4 *■. • - V»» * wA» ,v> ♦*« .. • . • >• •■<•■**• - i ■vr'. *•-«». v^"- V. ’ *• 1^ • .X A ■ ^ ft. .• : V ’ * tv . .* 0 •.' . *1V' i • •♦- V •. ... * -». . ^« ■ . i»'i» • .4 V•' . • V* ■•’•^ ■.s'. .• .-■.-■.•■<-> r-.H* ‘ •'• • V . “ ^ \ -V •'.■ .r -i* • •.^ • #. • =«- • ,.<J« '. •• .- ' * ’ 4 ■ '; ■' •,. • • -• * " V ^ •. . Jfck •■*»«l»l ^*• * , *• . ' 1 1 . V*.. i'*• ■ •. A . y*'• ■ ^ ; >. y " . .•• * •1.* * •'. ^5% • ^ • ' ♦ ■ : •'. :* , • • 0 ^ ■• • K ' • . ♦ • ^ « • 4* It U ’ • ; <-» •t • • ** “V •• '*- • ' . • . ' - ^ . V : ■ ■ f' \ ■ .* - ‘ •- - V. - **^ V*• • #•* -f. • ■’ • • • 4* • A 1 • «»"i""- ,.*■*.*.• . ** u." • • ^' ■ • ': •• '-.- ■ • ■ • —L * *m *• . . • ^ « • •n •*. ^ w:;. ■. € . ' » - 4 - 1. .. « > • ,. .. ■. 0> • %•*. • -fc - . <•I' *. . > V • ^• , »' ’ jr^. . ..V., -^>4: --f . . nw»'- r • ‘*'1 ' ' '• i"P. ■ ^ V *iN3* :-^' T' r:- , ^'7*'.i^ V-# ' . I -, •■-.* *■. - - -i ^ 1 li% . »».. ^ . v-v% . -n,VJ^:v f- '.. V. V. /••*.■...■*’ . o s <•v,-..‘•v SSiS r* ^ o ui ^ m ^ 2> 92 ^5Sr? ..T'>,4^.■'>\ ** *‘•y*. 'A"’.?''-; -e M m m S S • - '.’iv- S ^ ^ SgMg;.:^^^22l, S ^ ^ X M o n S> •4 •. : . :o f * • r- w • w>V . 4 %r : '.. ■ ■ ^ ‘ ' m r e o o ui Q ► fV9 Oi o (/> in o q O S VS> K* X o -n ;o N?-"S« r* X S S 1^ §2Ss:^ ► o m q ^ o </> H VI M ► 5s»»®s 2 m ni M VI S VI VI S§>^« im 2 f X o M23</>lflsr*3 m m » O O **-.v V'> - V *^- '• . •:v ‘- , V V"., '?■•, •'•'■ • '. 'f . . -•; V4* 4 . r V. «.^-* 1. X-<> m (A H M X X o m -< M in m X (/)(/> M in MM a c/) X o o VIX ►mo^ X f- M ► MOO r* M XM ► H f- IV X X o wQ ^ ► ► M Oi O VI X ^ !S r* fs> MMVI J HOW oK* r-Ow5^? ^ 5 * ft ^m2 o M 2 ► Q H in X m m c/> M in 5 "Hn * -4 - ... ^ . w, ^ ^.y to- ■ ■ A’-'*'- -^4 i ^ ^. - w;.. V r* n» c. c. o w rs> Oi in§eS .,-o"5 ’"S 2X00 ► ►mo M X X O W \M m o o o M X M isissi^ X g H X W f m o o o w Q IM rs» 92 N ► ► W X X in o r- o w► moo m M X X o Mx^iisr2 r* m m M M r n»► M aS o M r- fo r- r» o w ► Q ni m I X 2 H Mm 2 o o Q Miiiii:;cn z z H wM XO ► ► H M in m i/I M in (/) (n M wo o o in X o o m o V* ogP4> m m r- V r- rv O 0) o W T^/’ V Q ^ ? S in 5 ** H '»• i/I in o r- o I'i y •. .*• . > '■:V *SIg18 ■■ , -ypi n?3 in X X w o m m • i , Zfv * • ‘ A ■X 5 . ':jin'-i I t* II f f ^8^ r- r> o o o w Q w ► ra o2 9 X •• w Box 9m r- o o ii"? im H X ► o M 2 ~ OB fi < T*2 r" f" » M r>» ’*■*. I ’’ ■ .... ■■r' 1 r • • S-: •t >x V.- '-“! ■ ■ •Af mm.• . •. »« iK; *,• ,*• *. * • .* ‘ff.. .•V 'sn:-* ••- ^ ---------------n----------------------------------------- - - -»l .—1 Lm f m9* «f —wr"—I Vj I ^ ' i: 1- ■ ""ir » I -t' »• \ !• t i: N I- \. I ^ I- i* /vV » •« • • 40mmm * '*v J, '4 rk 't immm _ _ __% \ » «• \ ''\ \\ I* ^ s'Vi » I- 1* ■ww •■»a*-wV^ i '• ! sn Miiistm rsnns •* ^ \ ;i 2 \:> -V §• i \ ^ K •• < Cr • LaJ **1 >r ’l^i*ni->4- 1 ri^ •I' • 1 wi ■|L;» i • 1 "tI—■tl!*;1 i ■ 1 • t i fOi 1 * L M«U ■■’ 1. I. 3- ! I a-$ i* • 1 l-«r III I t ==r:<i; Millf* - i- t| \ V « « « • «> 1 :a A‘ • W9 V ' •• ./V- !♦ T \ ti • i i -■ilW-- J (^.y.‘'^-.3i i'M >•• * <7v- I t:> *’• iUlWvtHfl * •" .■‘.V>'*^,?'g W%S;S^i p m ' ( « . &-t:’ ^ .*.. j ^ ?♦.•• V''• i*. . .*. <'«*• • :• »• v-/*: •• • •'•••-■••■' /> . :# ./ .. •. .1 *v . • V:'v*r. ■•♦.'' • *VV* '* .Tv-.’*^.;jr. ..• •■v:5’‘>':“-*’"'.v* ^ .••• V .-*r •<. - A>. ‘ #. ^ V* ,•/ -'• 't-:•,..•..■u-*-= -r-V ■ •t'.-'A';. ••. • ‘ ^ ■ ••,*• >»/ *#•••. \* •. * » • .. •■' is . . . - • '•• ••- •. k.*. £ ' i' ' > *. rt<. «A«k %v « . '. ■ ■ *. “ '.r-.-w •'* is . . ^ *. rt* *AIV • • %fi * ■ ■ • ■» •. •^ «' ^- -A4-.rv':- • • • < 4** ■; * . .^ v*-« w * '< ' ■•' :;»■ -n. \ • I ^ ••1 • *, • ' » ' * • H •• « ’^' . •* •. ♦ r • ,* •A./^y^n^lr^r^ x\ V '"mi <^'-^ W*T?r' 4 ; ‘ i-'.'; i’>.t*i!v"?:k»:>-;. '• *^3;. .'V PiM 7 .7 <s^ «/ IN » -. \y:.-V ' / f % TMftM-i V, D i -if. I ‘y"& M CITY of ORONO (y - ^ ^. jsl Munkipai Offices PMt Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota SS3i ^,v ■ . . ■ i: ■)'Date; ■fr Hennepin County Government Center Department of Property Tax & Public Records Attn; Don Deutsch, ID Controller A 607 MinneapollSr MN 55487 Dear Mr. Deutsch; 14, •-■^ % ‘I (we) hereby make request for a combined assessment on the following described land; Legal Descriptions; Outlet A, Countryside Manor - 04-117-23 12 0005 2705 Watertown Road RLS 1089r Tract A - 04-117-23-12 0002 2645 Watertown Road irV 'f.y ■ii Address: 2645 Watertown Road Municipal Code: 38 For 1992 Tax Year F-^ V ' • .1 . I •Sr! Signature Of./j c>n Signature of Tax Payer(s) Ai/¥< Tax Payer duress ^<r: ■ .i :i-s;M ■:r'0M id - ■f-'Vtv -■ 3. !>' J!I» '-A, ir_,1 TELEPHONE-473-7357 ♦ FAX-47341510 '■41 ,^7 /J k L' i 4 j i 1 i-; - -=’^ COMMON HARVEST COMMUNITY FARM 2406 31s» A vwhm South MimMapoKs^ MN 55406 ■U/ . February 18, 1992 #172 ;A\ Orono Buiiding and Zoning Carmission Orono City Hall 1335 South Brown Road Orono, Minnesota. *Ail ) Dear Caimission; My name is Dan R. Guenthner and I am leasing a parcel of land from Orono resident Pat Dickey of 2645 Watertown Road for the purpose of raising organic, fresh vegetables. I will have approximately five acres mder cultivation in ^ixed vegetables (see enclosed map for details on specific location.) Tliere will be no on-farm sMes. The produce will be sold to a variety of outlets. I will continue to sell approximately 80^ of the food through a European marketing style refered to as ’’Coniiimity Supported Agriculture . In such an arrangement individual households contract directly with me for a given volume of fr<^«h produce for the growing season. I have enclosed a broctiure that futther explains the concept. Most of our households are in Wayzata and Minneapolis, although this season we will start our first group here in the Long Lake/Orono area. There will be 120 households altogether. I also sell directly to Lakewind’s Natural foods co-op in Minnetonka and to several restaurants throughout the Cities. Central to vegetable production in our nothem short-season climate is a Greenhouse. I have a 14’ by 100' standard hoop cold frame greenhouse. This is a temporary structure used primarily for starting the seedlings. I have enclosed a complete discription of the structure and how it is used on the next page. I would like to apply for a one year Conditional Use permit for this Green house structure. Please keep me informed of the necessary steps involved for this process. k Thank You for your support for this unique farming venture. It is my belief that we all benefit directly by suppporting a healthy, diverse, local food system. Sustainably, ' t . Dan R. Guenthner • • Feel free to contact me directly at 729-8695 wilh any questions. 4 fi • jy i ■ 2I?’^ 9 3 > ocn 3 */>r^ . *;v^ 3a JT= i =ro tr> ^ a OQ Ijssr - <8s. •a n H s c :;^ g-“^•8o C £ c 5«S'S TW* . .V. I 3 §r» ^ =p iT S. 2 = i ■ a CT 5^?ro ^ cl 5. o n ^ i*? a 5* 3 E. c • -3 ;»r. /■'•■ ai 5 V . . ‘ nc. 3 !* I I ^-| 8 3- I 2 O "" S - 5 2 v5 1i|i|li 5-§||=!i.5:|c'i II ?i- ‘[ ilii ^ ^ 8 a *“ a * i. ^ ii 3 S|«is - S'!. a o o g- o o 9 S 8 ^ , s = § =3 ; ; 5^ 0 ^ o 5 ^i d a - o ^ a u a = 5- MiB.'S I-57 a ar S o 3 S'O 1sc 5 2> I *5aa oo & & 3 o “ - ■I? ;5- Oi oo a b5?^ aa > o ^ 2 Os: s 5 s i li l!i"> ST oli i I- ? - 5-3 ^ m=5 C/5 ^:3 2.~^- § I 0*5 « ? Fc/i n a I. ii? ^ 3 n ST o n =? s* b i 2 S go ^ aa S) 5 5 I a p 3 Q^ aI Oa S* iiirQ > •8 ^i'5'? ^ DlO 5> ^q rt 5 S s- |.^2 'y1 3 3 _ ? 5- =^* S’ = g- = S ” £3 3 ::? « o. 2 5 5. P 3 3 3 K c 3 c- 2 — C 3 X “ O = ?g‘Er^ •R ^ 3 i . £ s 2,1 o S* a 5- S 3 E* o 00 I ^ -1 M '5 o > s 2 ^ q 3 m C. cr C. 3 i' & a* ••5 o 3 a O s OQa |l!sf llftiI'll'H iHil = lif- S » : s g =.ifi»la. o ^ 3 or 2 - 2 gOQ ^ 3 O C I Is II “ «* 0, « f pL a OQ I i =:o 3 5<Q.C« 5 S'. o « S §■ gll ■=11 s|3'r|9 a - S 3 o I 1 § ” ^ I i.^ s s i'<ipi-s IP° ?* i^a a » I ? Ie s I sk * £ a'a ^Htk C o a c.>3'o wva OQ ?5s a « " Q* K B a n • CD 5§ i i g I 0" • ^ 5 - —’ DC S'*sr s' n B5 * S'- 3 ®l|li 03 a §-'§■ o 03t| §'l 51 r§’c>Q s: ^ S 7 s: ,f: 1 - ••'ir r- S-V'-V* ■•• ■• :• *i K • ./; . -*. it:, ^•- ■ ' ■. •■ •- 1 ‘ ■ . - ■ • ,*lljf“|4fSif S' B. £ «• «i f sar* ClS 2 ^5*1 jqo £^.3 J«8 ?■ 3 i§ R tj B-- 5 S V^' ;'::- ■V,v^.-.;-*V * N fr O • . , r • .ilfsl?^§iljril •a 541 £lilt giS|s>l? 2 S 3 J s;l. 8|f|ff|l 1 “ 111'^a, I ^ i-f I i ili’ill = ^ -2 “g 5 ® ^ a- £ 3q.8B^2Q. 3 2,S?J ? « 2 |- R- c CT o fij •< Ji D a 2!'5f5 jifs f?!il?|i 5 & 5 8 a 5 -? J S' & i i 2, g_ c/> Co2T- C 5* 5 ^ ^ l£S|. i?i| ryj? o^’sg.DgX* CD 3 a Ig 3 ^ £-2 J S’B 3 C = 3y 3- £} S’ ^o * 3 £ ow ft, 3. 3 Sr c3 3 5 * S ^ n £ = £ 3 o = 2 5'^S?S-n rj ej =1 *. *< a . n 3- p- 0, R ? g £L I g- tt |. i T3 « 5 1 ¥ 3 o R«lor *3 £ ft S- - Is. ^O « g w'S ;rp ftJ ^ 'Mi 3</» ► if 1 *• n =r sr 5 K i do o 3r&•m m^' n ji- ^ 3X 2 r»« Sc. 5 OQ £ o ^ i- 2ac£js3n> §-S'^i'g5fc.3’3aE£«2 -2-5S^ =*'»rt"0"S“3'P®* = 5 11 ^ * sera 7Tn 7T(A w 3^'sf^l7 a S «-' f bj S'lf i i 11'! 5 IN I i Q i § i I li®^-gf Ior ff* g- o R 3 tA G0 HI II III D =1 3 ~ 3' 3 o I O g * I M'M'll I 3 •2 r ST. « 5 5. —1 « 8 a a - E ^ ii« a; S' 2 * 5 3 ® pi I Ij&l — K«8 g t ■2. S i sr c g 2 s 8 3 0 8 ^ fi "sL 21 Slip!* — Q. ^ l',g 11 s f3 Q 3^.0 3 If i nil ill ”3 *? a 2 fill!ft ' d K ‘ 3* P 3 *< iCl P, c o?&gp|j “Ijai *1^ •t 2? ? 5 Ipil ^ S ~ =1 =•II & fV 3oK 3 a - o S 3-0 S2 a i.l eIc. n =r •5' 3 § O 3 X- H o Cos Sto b5 to ■i 3^ ; J' -r : ' « .% ■ . I 4:* ^L :■; 0rr i'! Jl it^ ■' u V; :.A'- GREEtfflOUSE PLA^^S Dimensions: 14* vn.de by 100’ Icrr by 10 high. Structural design; Standard 22’ long iV arched steel tubing on 4 centers. 52 stakes anchored 2% in the ground vn.th 3 perlons (horizontal ties) for support. Exterior is a 6nm poly sifi. tacked to the wooden perlons on either side. r.. i,V ■ :v::i5 tfc V :.-M Heat source; ^8||^ A 125,000 BTU forced air furnace, fueled with propane. A temp orary 500 gallon tank is delivered by a local propane company. All state and local codes are observed in placing the the tank the proper distance from the structure and using the proper size copper tubing for the fuel hook up. lectricity:Used for the fan on the forced air furnace. A standard 14/2 wire is run from the closest outlet. ;vt:>Time used: The greenhouse will be needed from t^rch 15, 1992 to June 15, 1992 at wliich time it vn.ll be taken down. C-'-'’'? ■ '.‘V'v mm -ViiV 'T-fr .•7 mmm m /V’ - i.- /■■ V- ■ .. •> ■ y 4 ^^' >. • .. •‘.K • • ' ‘ ^ 'V* • *■ ^ . **. • -1 'f * i f-^' ’ ^ s ^ < y ^ ^ ^ - - __ ^—-I——i—*— ««■ z . ■ / ■: ’■'ifi' yr .'V, .-v- - ► .»• rx-t ■ ':'3 , «l ;;t‘. . ' \ '. • ' ‘.'o *7 : • ^-Ji . “ < i * 1 -V-fi \ I I F5^ - 7 * z. CITY of ORONO ^m-4''m4 ibi CITY OF ORONO Ik: Post Offiw Box 66•Crystal Bay. Minnesota 5K23• Municipal OfBcee On the North Shore of Lake Minnetotuia 11 May If 1991 m william Dickey 2645 Watertown Road Maple Plain, MN 55356 I#:. Re: Fence and Greenhouse Construction Dear Mr. Dickey: V * T ■ ;• im on 1/18/91 you where first notified of zoning !/rs%r^ni E/E?- slaf?t “he ferce^r^s^heer^Vowered to B'. A9ain the fence in this location is allowed to be 3 - max ir tn^e len met a 50' setback from the front lot line it coul e rbii^“lin°/P^r;l?-appUc%%“i^-or removal' of ‘the Structure has not been met. This letter is to notify you that if these tg® ^he resolved bv 5/20/91, the City will issue citations and -efer the matter to the City Attorney for further legal actions. If you have any questions or if you have this deadline please feel free to call anyone in the Building Zoning Department at 473-7357. ■" LO/jlb Bruce Vang, Field Inspector 1^: 7K I lUItNC & 7.0M N'C - 47>7357 assessing administration i nVANCE - 4T.*-735y FAX -47M'5U' PEtLir WORKS - 47?-735'> -j^: L ;j mTA "dW - • QF QRONCi CITY of ORON Post Office Box 66 • Crystal ^y, MinnMota .Munidpai pCBces__ On the North Shore of Lake MinnetorJta 'ixM March 5, 1991 William Dickey 2645 Watertcwn Road Long Lake^ MN 55356 Re: Fence Construction Dear Mr. Dickey; On January 18, 1991 this office notified you of a problem with a fence that was constructed on your property. You were given the option of lowering the fence to 3*5* or less or applying for a variance. A deadline of February 25, 1991 was given. As of this date the fence has not been altered and a variance application has not been submitted. This letter is to notify you that if the fence is not lowered to meet the Municipal Zoning Code or if a variance application has not been received by March 25, 1991, citations will be issued and the matter will be referred to the City Attorney for further legal action. If you have any questions or if X can assist you in any way please feel free to contact me at my office. sincerely. Building Official LO/tln cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Bruce Vang, Building Inspector wm ■9'^-r : - ' V / BUILDING Sl zoning - 473-7357 ASSESSING __________ ADMI.MSTRATION A FIN.\NCE - 473-7358 FAX-473-0510 PUBLIC WORKS -473-7359 I L. CITTof ORONO Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323• Municipal Offices QF QRa(^ia^On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka ■isgi^ m April 16, 1991 BxXX DXclc0y r^{}^ -0^7^ Watertown Road MapXe PXain, MN 55359 Re; Greenhouse Permit :;SslS Dear Mr. Dickey: We recentXy discussed the need for a buiXding permit for a greenhouse on your property. Since your property is cXassified agricuXturaX for tax Xand. Therefore setbacks from property Xines, size Ximitations and so forth must be met. Checking with Jeanne ’tabusth and the Orono City Code, a commerciaX greenhouse on your property wouXd not be a permittea use but a conditionaX use, requiring a conditionaX use permit. If the greenhouse is not put to commerciaX use, it wouXd be cXassified as an accessory structure and subject to orainances reXating to accessory uses on residentiaX property. PXease m with zoning staff to discuss this use as soon as possible or remove the greenhouse structure by May X, 1991- iif If you have any questions, contact Jeanne Mabusth at 473- 7357. SincereXy Bruce Vang, Inspector LyXe Oman, BuiXding OfficiaX St/II.DING a ZONING-473-7J57 ASSESSING At)MlNISTRAT10N 1 nX\NCE - 473-7358 FAX-4734)510 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 ' • a irJifi inaai'tii