Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-21-1992 Planning PacketPLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, JANUARY 21, 1992, 7:00 P.M. 1275 BROWN ROAD SOOTH - COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - J. Diann Goetten ATTENDANCE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING 1. 7:00 p.m. #1706 William F. S Evelyn S. Knapp, 4300 Bayside Rd. Preliminary Subdivision and Conditional Use "ermit for PRD ACTION ITEMS - Review of these items will commence prior to or between scheduled public hearings. Applicants presenting variance requests before the Commission are asked to move to the podium at the front of the Chambers when their application is announced by the Chairman. 2. #1700 Dale McCurdy, 4041 North Shore Drive - Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing 3. #1704 C. Arnold Carlson - Darlow Madge, 855/875 Forest Arms Lane Conditional Use i^ermit/Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing 4, #1705 Christopher Smith, 3650 Casco Avenue - Variance - Public Hearing 5, #1707 Jack Rhode, 1690 Shadywood Road - Renewal Variance - Public Hearing 6.#1708 Judson Dayton, 825 Old Crystal Bay Road South -- & Variance/Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing #1709 7.#1710 Richard Bloomquist, 3333 Shoreline Drive - Variance - Public Hearing 8.#1551 Robert Wade, Wildhurst Estate - A. Council Seeks Direction from Planning Commission Concerning Placement and Height of Entrance Monuments B. Recommendation - Plan for Entrance Monuments for Wildhurst Estates Planning Commission Comments - 9. Report by Planning Commission Representative to Council Meeting of December 9, 1991. 10. Status Report by Lake Use Committee Representatives lAafii w PC Agenda January 21, 1992 Page 2 11, Status Report by Facilities Committee Representatives 12. Other Issues. ADDITIOHAL ITEMS 13. Planning Commission Approval of Minutes of the November 18, 1991 Meeting. 14. Planning Commission to Select a Representative to Attend Februc.ry 10, 1992 Council Meeting. AOJOUR] i i To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:January 15, 1992 Subject:#1706 William & Evelyn Knapp, 4300 Bayside Road - Conditional Use Permit for Planned Residential Development (Preliminary Subdivision Application #1470 Conceptually Approved by Council November 1990) Zoning District: RR-IA Pertinent Ordinances 1. Section 10,32, Planned Residential Subdivision, At the November 13, 1990 meeting of the Council, Council conceptually approved the Planned Residential Development of the subject property in conjunction with the current subdivision application. Applicant was advised to file the necessary conditional use permit to complete the comprehensive application (review Exhibit D and E). Total area of property = 17.06 acres Lot 1, Block 1 * 3.3 acres Lot 1, Block 2 = 3.0 acres Lot 1, Block 3 = 2.7 acres Open Space Outlets A & B = 6.1 acres Private Road Outlet C ■» 1.2 acres Driveway Outlet D = .8 acres 2. Section 10.27, RR-IA Zoning District Standards List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Planning Commission Minutes 10/15/90 E - Council Minutes 11/13/90 P - Preliminary Plan - Topography, Existing & Proposed Improvements G - Building Pads/Lots I - Prel’.minary Plat Submitted with Current Application Status of Application At the November 13, 1990 meeting of the Council, the applicant was given conceptual approval of a Planned Residential Development of the subject property based on the design and layout shown in current survey. Exhibit I. All action on the preliminary subdivision application (#1470) has been tabled by the Council until the conditional use permit for PRD is presented to the Council. The following issues were resolved by Council at that earlier review for subdivision; %1 Zoning File #1706 January 15, 1992 Page 2 1.Council concurred that a road corridor to the Luce Line need not be provided with this subdivision along the eastern boundary lines. 2.It would not be necessary to extend a private road or private driveway to the Asao and Deters property to the northwest, although access could be provided at a later date through Outlot B if necessary. 3.A private road shall be constructed through Outlot C ending with a loop configuration as opposed to a cul- de-sac in an ai L jmpt tc save as many trees and minimize impact on the steeper elevations. m 4.The private drivev/ay within Outlot D was to serve three residences, two within the subdivision - Lot 1, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 3, and the property to the immediate east (property was recently sold by former owner S. McCloud). Mr. Knapp has been asked by the new owner to provide an access easement north of the original 60' access corridor platted along the south edge of the property. Staff will ask for confirmation that the easement is located within the expanded portion of Outlot D as it abutts the eastern boundary line. 5.Applicant to grant an access easement to the Nature Conservancy property. Based cn the configuration of Lot 1, Block 1, access may have to be provided via Outlot A. This access must be defined prior to final plat approval. It will be necessary to protect the alternate septic site within Lot 1, Block 1 during road construction and at the time a drive is installed to Conservancy lands. 6.Drainage easements shall be taken over portion of Outlot B that separates Lots 1, Block 1 and 2 and over the drainageway running from the south to the north within Lot 1, Block 1. Review of Planned Residential Develofxnent Conceptually the City granted approval for the development of the property under a Planned Residential Development based on the topographic constraints and the unusual configuration of the property. Applicant has failed to ask for special setback consideration in the filing of the PRD. Review Exhibit G. The building pads at 2 to 3 acre areas will require special setback consideration. Staff would recommend that 2 acre zoning standards (50' front and rear and 30' side) be considered rather than the current RR-IA (100' front and rear and 50' side). The building sites are limited by steep topographies, location of dralnageways requiring special setbacks, configuration of L -- - « ’ Zoning File #1706 January 15, 1992 Page 3 building pads/lots (specifically on Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2). Outlet D is classified as a private driveway and the code has no specific setback standards for structures adjacent to driveways. The City will ask that the 50' setback for all construction be maintained from Outlet D. As all pads/lots appear to be over 1.99 acres, are lot coverage constraints necessary? Applicant has noted at an earlier meeting that these covenants will attempt to minimize ‘ree removal and disturbance of the steeper sloped areas. Peview Exhibit H, the map that designates the arecs in excess of 18% slope. Should we restrict construction v’ithin these areas? If so, consider the impact on Lot 1, Block 1 - would you allow accessory structures to be constructed in front of the front line of the principal structure on Lot 1, Block 1? This would prohibit all additions to the west, north and east side of the existing structure. Certainly the open space areas (Outlets A and B) can be prohibited from any improvements involving land alterations. If prohibiting construction within areas in excess of 18% slopes is too restrictive, what other methods or controls are realistic? In your approval recommendation the following items should be addressed: 1. Special setbacks. 2.Restrictions on tree removal and land alterations within steep sloped areas. Options: A. Prohibit all land alterations/construction within areas found to be in excess of 18% slope. B. Create additional buffer areas within each building pad similar to Sugar Woods. C. Hardcover controls. D. Others deemed appropriate by Planning Commission. 3.Require open space easement over Outlets A and B. Easement to include future access drive to Nature Conservancy property. 4.The staking of alternate septic site within Lot 1, Block 1 and primary and alternate site in Lot 1, Block 2 prior to private road and private drive construction. 5.Because of special topographic constraints on Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2, would Planning Commission consider allowing accessory structures to be constructed in front of the front line of the principal structures? 6.Applicant to confirm that easement serving property to immediate east is located within private driveway outlet. Outlet D. » u* 1 } -----y"- • • « CITY OP ORONO #4, - GENERJtL'LANDnJSB •'•V 1 // ifappLicatiU'O rjt)^ PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Property Identification Numb‘=^r (P.I.D.) _3/-’// “P- 4'^ —OOO^^ 3>! • ooor /f/V-2L3 / '^-000-2^ Please attach legal description to application if not included APPLICANT Name Vf ILL/A/^ F fx£^\J£L.yAj -S’ Phone ihomB) ^4"^~ S/^ Phone (worJc) S'^'7^4~7C)'2-- - - JJjAVpr-- Address ^3<S><D City (^/?0/vo Zip OWNER (if different than applicant) Neune Phone (home) Phone Address Citv Zio Date Prooertv Acauired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL DSE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150,00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Conunercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration riTT cr unm criiAiiiiT nccTrcr ^tjnnLL, ui i iu4» U50200000 01 CEti 1215.00 CHECK Ji 1215.00 HECEiPT-rnm you M231320 cool ROl T10:( f O/Oi /c Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore OTE PRD/PID - see fee schedule ^ f APPLICATIONS ^ Sue>C>. Pt-e" Lcnr $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $250.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule ^ j iifa PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Othe^ (spcioify DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST fv Describe request in detail: * 1^-^ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS JK Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. K 7. TOO ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll** X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete Initials of Clerical Staff: Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Jcnowledge. Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ac)cnowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. 1 Date ‘j/ \ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. J r? UfWw»SS> ^ RUN DATE 09/08/89 HemEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OJWERS LIST DATCH 003 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER »<AHE/ADOR 38 06-117-23 11 0003 092A6 BAYSIDE RO VCI CAPITAL INC VCl CAPITAL INC PO BOX 375 LONG LAKE MN 55356 PROP ADOR OFMER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP ADOR OFMER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR 38 06-117-23 12 0003/ 04355 BAYSIDE RC VCl CAPITAL INC VCI CAPITAL INC PO BOX 375 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 31-118-23 41 8089- 04115 WATERTOWN RD M R A N E PLANK MICHAEL R A MARY E PLANK 4145 WATERTOWN RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 J38 31-118-23 42 0005 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED WINNIFREO M BRYANT HINNIFREO M BRYANT C/0 MERLE STILES 1801 LAKEVIEW TER LONG LAKE 55356 / PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER t4AME/ADDR 38 31-118-23 43 0007 00038 AOORESS Ur4ASSIGT4ED P ASAO A J ASAO PHILLIP ASAO 125 TURNHAM ROAD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 PROP ADDR OWTJER NAME TAXPAY' < NAME/..* R 38 31-118-23 43 0011V 00145 TURNHAM RO KEITH L HOWELL ET AL DAVID A DETERS 145 TURNHAM RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-117-23 12 0001*/ 04360 BAYSIDE RO J A OLSON APE OLSON JAMES A OLSON 4360 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN m 55359 38 06-117-23 21 0001*^ 04465 BAYSIDE RD MAP JOHNSON mWK-0 A- 4465 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 kAY:>iue. Nu INSON -PATRieW P -JOIIN80W- 38 31-118-23 42 0001 04245 CHIPPEWA LA R L SORENSEN ETAL ROBERT L SORENSEN 4245 CHIPPEWA LAME MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 y y38 31-118-23 43 0003 00038 ADDRESS UfJASSIGMEP WimiFRBD M/JRYANT kliJAfP WimiFREby BRYANT ^ C/0 MERL^TII.ES UleO -1801 LAI^VfEH TER - LONG LAKE Wr 55556 ^ y38 31-118-23 43 0008 04300 BAYSIDE RD sciiutz -6s!n ^ll corporation SCHOTZ-O^ILL 1015 TONKANA RD LONG LAKE MR 55356 CORPORATION> V*' J38 31-118-23 44 0001 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO STATE OF MIIA4 STATE OF MlNtJ REPORT NO. P1435401 PAGE 4 y38 06-117-23 12 0002 * 04300 BAYSIDE RD ^ sciiutz -ikneill corporation SCHUTZ-0'NEILL CORPORATION 1015 TOm/wA RO LONG LANE MN^ 55356 38 06-117-23 21 0002 04455 BAYSIDE RD MSP JOHNSON MARK S S PATRICIA P JOHNSON 4455 BAYSIDE RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 o%s*. /38 31-118-23 42 0003 04355 CHIPPEWA LA FREDERICK E SHEMANEK JR ETAL FRED E SHEMANEK RT 2 BOX 16 MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 31-118-23 43 0006 00125 TURNHAM RO / P R ASAO A J A ASAO PHILIP R A JOY A ASAO 125 TURNHAM RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 / <1 V y38 31-118-23 43 0009 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO NATURE CONSERVANCY NATURE CONSERVANCY 1313 5TH ST S E SUITE 314 MPLS MN 55414 f y38 31-118-23 44 0004 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO THOMAS 1L REltRSGORO ETAL THOMAS E>6jflERSG0RD 4500 W MPLS A-P MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD OCTOBER 15, 1990 ATTENDANCE 7:00 P.M. The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date v;ith the following members present: Planning Commission Chair Charlie Kelley and Planning Commission Member Ed Cohen, Jim Hanson, and Candace Rowlette. The following represented the City Staff: Building and Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Scheffler. PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT #3 It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that reviev/ of this item be delayed due to the absence of three Planning Commission members. #1470 BILL KNAPP/DAN PARTEN 4300 BAYSIDE ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION REFERRAL FROM COUNCIL 7:00 P.M. TO 7:20 P.M. Mr. Knapp was present. Gaffron stated that Mr. Knapp has purchased this property from Mr. Parten. He said, "Mr. Knapp intends to develop the property as a three-lot PRD. as previously suggested b> staff and the Planning Commission." Gaffron showed a sketch of the pj^operty and the planned development. He said. One of the concerns expressed in previous reviews involved access for parcels north of this property. Currently these properties achieve access by crossing the Luce Line and the owners prefer it that way. Is it necessary to consider a future alternate access via Mr. Knapp’s property? Another issue is a possible north/south connecting corridor. Again, the residents in the were opposed to such a proposal. With regard to tha Nature Conservancy, the Public Works Director has asked that an easement be provided with this PRD to access that property." Gaffron reviewed the other issues relating to this development (see Michael Gaffron's memo dated September 18, 1990). Kelley asked Gaffron to comment on the proposed alternate septic site proposed for Lot 1, Block 1. Gaffron replied, "It is the only option available.” Kelley asked, "It may be the only alternative, but does it make sense and will it work?" Gaffron replied, "From a technical standpoint, it is possible to pump over to the alternate site. It is a long distance and will require a large pump. Due to the steep slopes of the property, that is the only possible location for an alternate site." - 1 - D-i iLi'. ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 15, 1990 ZONING FILE #1470-KNAPP CONTINUED Kelley asked when the existing house was constructed and where the alternate septic site was established at that time. Mr. Knapp stated that the house was constructed in 1983. Gaffron added, "Sites were tested just down the hill from the house. That site could have been used for a trench system, but was questionable. Because the property had ten acres, there were other areas that could have been used. In my opinion, the present proposal is improving the situation." Kelley asked whether it would be feasible to restrict any expansion of the existing house. Mr. Knapp commented, "I do not believe that the existing house fits in with the other houses in the area. It is a fairly small, four bedroom rambler. I believe the owner has plans to remodel the house and double its size, but intends to have only three bedrooms." Mabusth asked how many bedrooms the house could have if the alternate septic site were used. Gaffron replied, "The alternate site can support a five bedroom house. There is no ability to expand the present septic site." Kelley asked how many bedrooms the houses on the other lots may have in relation to septic capacity. Gaffron replied, "I believe the other sites have been tested and will support five bedroom homes." Kelley asked Gaffron whether he would recommend limiting the number of bedrooms for the existing house. Gaffron replied, "If the Planning Commission wishes to include such a recommendaticn, that is fine. The house could be expanded without increasing the number of bedrooms." Ksilsy asked the Planning Commission whether in their opinion a PRD is a suitable method for developing this parcel. Hanson said, "I have strong reservations about this development because of the topography and my position on roads. It appears that gerrymandering is occurring here. I am also concerned about the long term viability of the septic system for Lot 1, Block 1." Rowlette stated that developed using a PRU. she would prefer to have the property - 2 - ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 15, 1990 ZONING FILE #1470-KNAPP CONTINUED Cohen preferred to see a straight subdivision. Kelley said, "I believe that a PRD is suitable. This is a unigue parcel because of the land characteristics. With regard to the proposed cul-de-sac and private driveway configuration, Mr. Knapp asked how many driveways can access off of a cul-de-sac. Kelley replied, "There is really no limitation as long as other safety and lot width standards are met. Mr. Knapp suggested that the three driveways could access dirGCtly from the cul-de-sac. Hanson asked Mr. Knapp if he had explored the possibility of acquiring additional land. Mr. Knapp replied, "The Nature Conservancy is to the west, the property to the east is wetland. I have talked wxth Mr. White regarding the road. I had suggested a more direct approach to the cul-de-sac. Mr. vmite indicated that he has no plans to further develop his property and that my suggestions would devalue his property." Kelley believed that the present proposal, one driveway off of the cul-de-sac, made more sense from a planning point of view. Mr. Knapp said, "I am trying very hard to minimize any impact to the trees. The trees are the value and beauty of the property. I purchased the property with the intent to construct a home for myself. However, it is an expensive piece of property. I am not a developer, but I do intend to establish some limitations that will protect the land and trees as much as possible." It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Hanson, to recommend approval of the proposed three-lot PRD with a single driveway access from the cul-de-sac. The driveway shall form a T to serve one lot to the east and two lots to the north. The hardship for this configuration is the inability to locate the cul-de-sac further east due to the topography. It is further recommended that an easement be provided for access to the Nature Conservancy, and that Outlot D not continue west or north. Gaffron asked if the loo^ was acceptable in lieu of a cul-de-sac. The Planning Commission agreed a loop is acceptable. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion carried. - 3 - D-3 I. ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT #1470 KNAPP/PARTEN 4300 BAYSIDE ROAD PRELIMINARY PLAT Mr. Knapp was present Bernhardson reviewed the specific Planning Commission recommendations and explained that this preliminary subdivision proposal does meet the PRD criteria. He said, Planning Commission did approve the PRD approach to subdividing this parcel. It will be necessary for Mr. Knapp to file a Conditional Use Permit application to be reviewed by the Planning Commission at their January meeting." Gaffron said, "I believe that the applicant is requesting conceptual approval of this plan so that he can submit a Conditional Use Permit application." Goetten noted that the Planning Commission had previously considered the provision of future connecting roads from this parcel. She questioned why that was no longer a consideration. Gaffron replied, "The Planning Commission reviewed tv;o or three possibilities. The first was to provide an access for the two houses just south of the Luce Line. Both of those property owners adamantly opposed such a plan, stating that their easement from the DNR to cross the Luce Line was sufficient. The Planning Commission felt that the City does not have an obligation to provide an alternate access. However, should it be necessary in the future, there is an outlet that could be used. The second consideration is whether or not there should be a continuation across the Luce Line to Watertown Road. Again, the Planning Commission believed that there was no obvious need that at this time. The third consideration involved the inclusion of Mr. White's property to the south and a continuation of a road to Bayside. That opportunity is still there, should Mr. White decide to further develop his property." It was moved by Nettles, seconded by Goetten, to give conceptual approval of the P.RD concept plan as recommended by the Planning Commission, and direct Mr. Knapp to make the appropriate PRD Conditional Use Permit application. Motion. Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion passed. #1497 TOBERMAN PROPERTY 1960 SHORELINE DRIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DENIAL RESOLUTION :t was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Peterson, to table this matter until the November 26, 1990 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes~4, Nays-0. Motion passed. - 7 - 1 ■•J I l~<1 I ■ J r a 7 > • To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Moorse Prom:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator i>ate: Subject January 1, 1992 #1700 Dale McCurdy, 4041 North Shore Drive Variances - Continuation of Public Hearing Mr. McCurdy has advised staff that he will be able to attend the Tuesday, January 21, 1992 meeting of the Planning Commission. All affected property owners have been renotified. Please note the public hearing has been continued from the November 18, 1991 meeting of the Planning Commission. The original packet has been recopied for Planning Commission's review. i.riM^hlUi kf Ml* -OnXC^tl-fkhMil v^r'k.^TS kdliriUiB'Y* ^ /I r« flTi Ml To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Moorse From Jeanne A, Mabusth» Building & Zoning Administrator Date:November 14, 1991 Subject #1700 Dale McCurdy, 4041 North Shore Drive Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover excess exists within 75-250' setback area. Hardcover variance approved December 8, 1986 (Resolution #2102), Exhibit J for a detached garage. Hardcover facts were developed by staff for that review. They were as follows : 75-250’ setback area = 20,625 s.f. Existing hardcover = 5,907 s.f. or 28.6%* ♦Refer to Exhibits 1(1) & (2). Applicant has submitted the same hardcover facts developed by staff in 1986. Current application proposes *= 119 s.f. of structural hard-over to be installed over existing hardcover (patio). No net increase in hardcover. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14(c) - Lot coverage allowed ■= 3,094 s.f. Exlfting = 2,180 s.f. or 10.5% Proposed = 2,299 s.f. or 11.4% No lot coverage variance required. or 15% List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit Ad) Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit 1(1) Exhibit 1(2) Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit L Exhibit M Exhibit N - Application - Applicant's Addendum - Property Owners List - Plat Map - Survey - Adjacent Property Owners Acknowledgment Form - Survey for Addition 1976 - Average Lakeshore Setback Line - Sewer As Built - Hardcover Fact Sheet Prepared by Staff for '86 Application - Applicants Hardcover Fact Sheet - Resolution #2102 - Building Permit #6318/4-6-87 - Building Permit Application 1091 - Floor Plan for Deck Addition 10-17-91 - Sketch-North/Street Elevation ■ ;* /' ' 'V>1 .*0 L. r Zoning File #1700 November 14, 1991 Page 2 Description of Request Applicant seeks approval of a 7'xl8' second story deck to be Installed to the north or street side of the existing residence. The deck will be located over an existing patio resulting in no net increase of hardcover. Improvement will result in a 119 s.f. of additional structural hardcover on the property. Lot coverage with the proposed deck will be at 11.4%. Review Exhibit F. Applicant claimed that the deck was originally proposed at the time of the construction of the addition to the west side of the residence in 1976. The patio doors were proposed at the second story level. Staff can find no record of the original plans that would show the proposed second story deck. Applicant has been asked to provide a copy of the those plans for our review. Applicant commenced construction of the second story deck believing that the deck was already covered in the 1976 building permit. Applicant was asked to stop construction and to file for the necessary building permit. In reviewing the existing property and the hardcover facts submitted for the 1986 review, staff has noted errors in those original calculations involving the 0-75' setback area. In addition, the current hardcover facts do not reflect the driveway in its current configuration that were installed at the time of the construction of the detached garage. Staff has asked that Mr. McCurdy provide upoated survey and hardcover facts for the current review. Mr. McCurdy has advised that the updated survey and hardcover review will cost more than the second story deck. Review Exhibit A-1. Applicant has filed the application submitting the former hardcover facts asking for special consideration as the proposed improvements will not result in an increase in hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. If it is the intention of the Planning Commission to recommend approval of the application that results in 119 s.f. of additional structural hardcover, your options are as follows: A.To recommend approval of second story deck addition and to advise applicant that if other improvements are proposed at some future date, applicant will be responsible for providing an updated survey and hardcover inventory for the property. /iMiirlt ■ e:/ Zoning File #1700 November 14r 1991 Page 3 B.To recommend approval of the deck addition only upon receipt of an updated survey and hardcover inventory. In the original 1986 variance application, the approval was conditioned upon applicant providing an access and utility easement over the sewer lines that intersect the property. Review Exhibits G and H. Applicant is asked to advise if an executed access and utility easement has ever been submitted to the City for recording. Staff can confirm the removal of 250 s.f. of landscape hardcover along wer ^ '■ -i•» of house. Hardship Statement Please view Exhibit A. : 'v'.'sf: ■ ■ [IS ' r H- CITY OP ORONO - VARXANCB APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 u -11 n% ft i ^<^ = 0,00 car aach additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change froip original appxicarion) After—the—Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Cl! f OF OROsO ri'.v^.vrf OFFICE 1350200000 01 OEtl 175. OC n. 175.0C RECEIPT-THiUm YOU ^227090 cool ROi 70S: 10/24/ Site Address 4^ 1 K/ 0 g- l H—-----------—- __ required survey. TtA^.T' fe ^ (Ve.Cr. _____________ APPLICANT N^une D A t—^ • Phone (home) ■4’'“) ~Z. - 4-6 ^3 1^ ^ (J A D V Phone (worJc) -4-~7‘2, - ft / iJofcTU $Hofc.e.^fe-'ty= — gjp= OWNER (if different than applicant) ^ Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:U i u •Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. present OSE op PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) OBSCRIPTIOH OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ "7^Q- 5^C-0/s30 5T0<-'C' Describe request in detail : To_< L.T Ayy, ^ 5li^c.E rcL«ie.<ioiJCtere PAx«0. ZpJO ?rafe-V P*iTia— ----------------------------------------T’T'^Tb ■£VioVt"^‘vrc.T7'5 ’«^» K/g hJew VARIANCES REQUIRED - - - - - - - - - - -— Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other_ _ _ _ __ Lot Width Front Hardcover Side _ _ _ Rear)' “®®”Lribe undue hardship or practical diffi=J.lhy ► enforcement of zoning regulations; f — i k/0X4 / g.a<- -m fl' hfaP. 7pg.c < xVA< Tt> &£ iM n.lLA BSCRIPTION OP DNUSDAL VrOPERTY CONDITIONS ^ ^ ________________________ A t^At0 6-gX Tt? R.gS'tOeNJT ^^ (QOIBEDTnBMITTALS fruJESTS Completed Application Forties j je^ pgg^ obtain SToft-V PATiO Oo0(^---- ________________________ ^ ^ __ - - .J^ ^ <K Completed Application Form^'>y|T»>J^ +. • a. •sn*;;:; rrEJ..'?“»^?S::;z: ;.“k;.s'Je -n 348-3271). ,. “rtifrtr:r:ur“v “‘' r;K^rrU^:fs’ed su^eyor, t^lnclude hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8% xll for Topographi^survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 81 xll ). Sketches or plans of floor s elevation views (provide 1 copy Sij xll ). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate lis any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. le Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. member that your variance application is not complete if the above ornM*<-i nn has not been included. IT’^a'^ical.t'^^y agrees to provide all ^c^ov\*'r\l°bro ",1"af ?nl%ri?n;uT a\t expenses ,cur in review oi this application, and certifies that the information ipplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. )plicant’s Signature RS SI6HATDRB Date Ai/aJ. !he owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further Llthorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, ' gents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga ion and verification of this request imer • s Signature J. ” A ‘/^ rrr bplicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Kiminrcommission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings ^eld on the bird Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at =5?'®^“^® .view meetings of the Planning Commission and Co^cil. If “ nable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make “”"5®”?"^? , Zoning uthorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Buildi g ffice of this change prior to the meeting. 1 : ii'i I it^ M Tk ifMf 11 -------- i. I*- *1 ^if J 1 ^ / u DAue. .4p.^L ,^r.H 5 rfo.?:i_^ ^ I v/(^„_ // 'J -/ • I IRP^ :C05X :•! ._.____i-. ..# 7 Bo » |j ij # 1 5o1 ! ro _. 3 uj UD___T_H_ 1.5.__ C-O-i'. A “_.l/MA”TT.d<A?J A __^_K) o..„.i—A 6»o^ ______________A H . .. 'JrP ‘ ^ W \T\\.. H ^ _____ _________0 F. M y. „<*0 u s I _________ ...M AT e:|i. \ A _U _0.^— y o~ t Nj /\ TD Jt^GSTo^ E_._.HOUS& Xo ND iT'jo/J- . I # n.5 p A.0 /Oo„. VA A (U loo o f o s s )C>l-E. /n JEW sU/^-V'^Y *“• i! ._>o 0 l.i M I M I MUK__L.Q.S'T _.W.o/^\C _X3 K£._J!Tr^ •M&ET With Mo__P.liLOf_UC______ —X I E A__fvJ.^.W .- 5U/2-v/eY .. .<^£Q.Uve-£^D. . \. .WlLU I' ' t ,ROX__P Uf?L5„ XAA ^ cI-on JST(^eXlP/0__0Fr_T^V\\ $ ___S&-^o ^JO „ PL. ArJhJ I ___Com M i____ |U 0 V e.H e>£f^_. J.6 ^ _.i ^ 5.1 — ■ . uiAfiir itiiii RUN DATE 10/21/91 BATCH 002 '7‘ PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TWAYER NAME/ADOR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR QNNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR • PROP ADDR QNNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OltCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR I ■ '. ■ lU. r m« 1 . V V V .HENNEPIN ./ * 38 07-117-25 44 0004 04009 NORTH SHORE DR JANICE F SEGNER JANICE F SEGNER 4009 NORTH SHORE DR HOUND MN 55364 I 38 07-117-23 44 0010 04079 HIGHNOOD RD JOHN T SANBORN ETAL J T SANBORN 4079 HIGHNOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0063 04044 NORTH SHORE DR GREGORY N PRICE GREGORY N PRICE 4040 NORTH SHORE OR HAYZATA MN 55391 38 07-117-23 44 0066 04000 NORTH SHORE OR R J BREZA AKA JOHNSON R J BREZA I K A JOHNSON 4000 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 TOTAL BATCH 002 00012 t • I COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWERS LIST 38 07-117-23 44 0005 04017 NORTH SHORE OR JOHN F THEOBALD ETAL JOHN F THEOBALD 4017 NORTH SHORE OR HOUND MN 55364 I * • 38 07-117-23 44 0035 04104 HIGHNOOD RD GAB SAUER GLEN A BEVERLY SAUER 4104 HIGHNOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0064 04040 NORTH SHORE DR GREGORY N PRICE GREGORY N PRICE 4040 NORTH SHORE DR HAYZATA MN 55391 38 07-117-23 44 0076 04051 HIGHNOOD RD A A E VONGRIES ALEXANDER A EDITH VONGRIES 4051 HIGHNOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0035 BRADLEY P JOHNSON BRADLEY P JOHNSON PO BOX 96 NAVARRE MN 55392 I m riiminii iiUMflriliiii ' 1 . Vi- .». • I'v < 4 .** i-;» ■*'■ f V 'h-A ■ • : REPORT HO. PI43S401 - PACE,- S' . 38 07-117-23 44 0009 04075 HIGHNOOD RD R S PROCHNOH A S B PROCHNON ' ROBERT S A SARAH B PROCHNOH ( 4075 HIGHNOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 . • ^ ** V. 38 07-117-23 44 0062 04056 NORTH SHORE OR MARILYN J RENO MARILYN J RENO 4056 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0065 04044 NORTH SHORE DR GREGORY N PRICE GREGORY N PRICE 4040 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0077 04041 NORTH SHORE DR DAS MCCURDY DALE J MCCURDY 4041 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 \ ^1* V % ♦ * * . * • /* ^ •> *■ t 4 ; I \ — 4 >. 'Hi i* i . ■« “ y .w-. ; , «• it ‘ . f Hi »« ,. * - i , I t »* * •>V M. V < . * • • t 0 ‘» • •■ i ' .* • t * ♦ . . *». f t ■* t • ! - ‘f ■ f * ./# ** * 1 ••’ ■J’’ >♦... • 1 . A. -. f * .» I . ^ > * * ’if % J ’• < ,;4 ‘i" , *. • « RUN DATE 10/21/91 4 •• BATCH 002 •.: ‘ \'v . HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATXON SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST 'V ! V •' t ♦^ y- • > •Kit ».«/>< 7 ' I' ^ I ' ' . i'r'..'.,, ,• • » ri’ • j1 - - .# I'l . • V-’r. J • 1 * •*■ • • •i ; > ♦ r ‘I V ■' ^ • i. • A •*% r ; •■ ■. ; '"V''4 a i • ■ ■ ; V- • ,•■ \l, i \uU^ ;.* • I' V * ''•i ' \ 'VS': p -s* % • . ' • II J . ‘ ♦ ♦ ' -»*'• • ^. V.o . I ■ REPORT NO. PI<f55<»01 PAGE 6 I . I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HErt4EPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY^TAXATION. TO THt BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATI . > k ■ 1 . V 4 I •J ■» t:’ .i V ' I •'N ♦ ’ I . k 4. l » V I . .• % » ' i •i /* ; ' I * • 1 m ■ ■ •■ •: « : ^.i ■,■ v ^ |>':;I ■' ■ ; .1/ . . '•-e. ; ->.u-ViV*' ^ »-:. • .V ...J55i.'.v t*k. .’\I. . • , 14.i-*JA * •.*» .*■* s >«T or ytu Htu rim (27) (H) 'i (25) ct>I 'j> t _ (1) a CO A y' (^S 1 .**:o. 6 wm (81), '(82 ’a/» * • >‘no J > S' V ‘il * 2^1______1 1 M'/d » n(-»r1 --in ./.J >00 \ ( 7 * ' n 1 ^95 J M (70) .5/60 -S/6i 5/6-j s. * f«» (u) (7) iV. '( 52 Wm.' (69) 91 .'C8) ^(37 ■?/to .«/ :»A-u y X8^)y (n) 3< 9/si ^M77ri%' 41 JTi f(Tl), '(27 ( ’0)‘,-y ^ :9i<x2ii (76) (77)O'" ±^dusL ( ( s U" ! ^ o A nr *A •W’ ■?'' & nn\ •V, 3' C6 9tS r u Flat of Surroy for Dale J. l‘.cCurdy in Lota 7, 8, and 9, t’i^hyced Lako Minnetonka Ksrjnepin County, Minnesota , . ;7 U • vj 7/■ T’a " • w.‘r -1^-zro 7 _ zo, t . ■! i f rv • ^ « •* Certificate of Sxrrvay:- I hereby certify that this is a true and correct repre­ sentation of a surrey of the boxndaries of Lots 7 and 8, and that part of the Easterly 11 feet of Lot 9 lying Northerly of a lino described as follovs: Coa- mencing at the iutersectioh. of the Westerly line of said • Easterly 11 feet vith. the Northerly line of said Lot 9j - thence Southerly along said Westerly line a distance of 157.25 feet to, the point of beginning of the line being described? thence deflecting left to a point on the East ■ line of said Lot 9 distant 217.3 feet Southerly froa the North — east corner of said Lot 9> and there ending, Highwcod Lake Minne­ tonka, and of the location of all buildings thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, fron ’or on said lend. For purposes of this survey, the vaterlino as of 10-14-75 has been assiuned to.be the Southerly line of said lots i • • . • 1" = 40* 10-14-75 Iron carker found Iron narkor set Cordon R. Coffin Rog. >vT6064 Land Surveyor and Planner Long Lako, Minnesota »v>r#iViv Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form I (we) ToKkI ^k:Ag.E/J TK£gBALb of 4i?\n /Jd/L-tH 5Hog.E. D(L. [print name(s)J [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed ise of the property located at 1 kJ. DC. also referred to as Land Use Application No. ______. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use [uires Council approval. Date (Vu/U Property Owner I (we) ALEX. ^ SO \/OKiof ‘4t? i \A \ \aJ0 b [print name(s)J [print address I have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the ;;-rperty located at 4o4-l nJ • 5>HolLE D/^. also referred to as Land Use Application No. _____. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare “approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the orooosed neighbor.'s project or use r.quires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have £my information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. .1. ' 7 ■ 4 \ ?C"7 ! Plat of Survey for Dale J. McCurdy in Lota 7, 8, and 9, Highwood Lake Minnetonka Hennepin County, Minnesota Cq ■ > ■ % i y .. .•• /f ••: 4 **-r Scale ; Date : 1" = 40' 10-14-75 Iron !=arker found Iron narker set Certificate of Survey: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct repre­ sentation of a survey of the boundaries of lots 7 and 8, and that part of the Easterly H feet of Lot 9 lying Kortherlj' of a line described as follows: Co2>- mencing at the intersection o'’ the Westerly line of said Easterl;>’ 11 feet with the O Northerly line of said Lot 9j thence Southerly along said Westerly line a distance of 157.25 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence deflecting left to a point on the East line of said Lot 9 distant 217.3 feet Southerly from the North ­ east corner of said Lot 9, and there ending, Highwood Lake Minne­ tonka, and of the location of all buildings thereon, and all visible encroachments, if aro ’’, fron or on said land. For purposes of this survey, the waterline as of 10—14—75 has been assumed to be the Southerly line of said lots Cordon R. Coffin Reg. i^/i 6064 Land Surveyor and Planner Long lake, Minnesota • ■ . < 7 l*f 3 ^r> •V4I: ^1 mjm/f V -t 0 » r4i» •#( / L-v-^O.41 /^►-l 10V ■»' //O V -/V"'w;-. Lv ^ WvV / KauSt. itk 4 '' > / /ic. •*7^r ‘'v^- ■’^>1 / V -.♦’ r7-•?./ X V -S E^ I ^*^.74 SU^ A / wT*#* a 4tre* 7,74^ M 7r i%f70fy. t;•nr-I...... ,;i.7 .'■Wv . .L'*^ V. ^z;/. from or on said laiiu. • r Le: k f : "■• •S’V c»rttfr •* y round. Cordon R. CoH Land £ur\*’eyor I hereby certify tl correct represental boundaries of that Westerly of a line the Northerly 11 ne Westerly from the I the Southwest cornt 5 and 6, Highwood I existing house, gai It does not purport or encroachments, the "Southwesterly been assumed to be of said lot distant the Northwesterly c point <'*?m$ to fit and old Iron marker *T'* “ T-ITI I, , ____________ ""' " ' ' ' •'*' '"^- • ■*^^•:;■ r-zvih-r.-’*, .!>••': V '■■ ’{::y‘^"-^TT_ .... \ • :i:~ • : \ .••• ,,*:r‘ \ —— I * ••. *fi' I •, •• - ' tr * : • • • *: v ;. V I • ' » • t . *t • . 'i .♦ ’ >. ) • • • «l ,.' r ••• *-;W\* ft * .•. ^*‘ »t**. ^ *• m3 lALOMO ^"*1 ^ 12 ft ft MHo 338/o foot BRIDGE / / / '‘'‘e y/ .••». cone. •TCM 0»65 5* LONG 7 DP •♦6 5 •V^ONG 5 DP • iV /r If 16 I3’L0NG 3‘OP ^337 ft • 1 COK^' 8T£^8 f»ieP8.. '33/ / 8Q-OAKf . f ^ I. J.-' k\I<^ 9°: oak . • mh^ 330.6-o^>.. ’ V / • ' •■'• •■ I 'iILM I Vv;: .' ';U A’^ rv ‘ y:, m. •• • ' •• •r.•. •^ Zft ® f / M . %l •*•♦ t: ‘ -’ '■ *> * ■ \* * *• » * ' .• y^- ' • • yy:-' *♦ ••-‘•■' ■' ; -t •iv'x-*-. • -.<• ^ •■ •' * •'.■ , J ■ •r ^ . . .,: • I«> •• )(m » . •« * • r’Xv;r* • f: •• ♦ : S . f - F-. ;• - f . • *»• • V •«• • ! •. >•* •-FV/PI I ^ • •• • L|^n^aiinim r * ‘ 9 %• »♦- hardcover review 4041 North Shore Drive 0-75': No existing hardcover No proposed hardcover 75-250*: Lot Area ■ 20»625 s.f. Existing Hardcover - ,House (16x27)+(18x28)+(6x22) West Sidewalk (2x30) Front Patio (12x12) Driveway (30x60)+(22xl4)+(95xl0)+ (20x25/2.) Garage (14x20) East Sidewalk (3x60)+(5x7) (Assumes removal of plastic under west side yard area - 250 s.f. +/-) 1,068 s.f 60 s.f 144 s.f 3,308 s.f 280 s.f 215 s.f Existing ■ 24.6% Proposed Garage » 5,075 s.f + 832 s.f TOTAL PROPOSED 5,907 S.f 5,907/20,625 - 28.6% Proposed r' . ': ^ k . * -r •*.... . ^ ...•• *%• *‘4 94m >.fcftrin<rVif ...iJliiii 1 w f «»• i L %# O LJl i iwil II O • »I\W» »L»« 3cT3A c:< ZONE: (circle one ) G-75' 7;_7rr.' U r- 1Kl ' W ^ 'W W 500 ■ r>nn / Existing Hardcover in Zone (l4 ^2.~0 VQS X2 sj+(fc ^ A, House lo^ 8) S.F. LENGTH WIDTH ^ S • r • S.F. S;F. 3. c-h ^hoe, Z (o >2^8^Z-S.F. B. Garage 14-X 2.0 280 S.F. fcoWCza-y. 14-3+G^i»Xl0^ « c. Driveway ___x-----------------= >P9.A— s .f. S.F. ^ werr D. Sidewalk _____^3o 6 o S.F. (c o I So S.F, e/v5v e. Patio /-Deex- . «Fe.»4T Tc. 3 S S.F. (2- X S.F. F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY , . PLASTIC SHEETING S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. G. O ther S.F. =^* 1 rj Total Hardcover in Zone Total P roperty Area in Zone 5^o7_ S.F. jT 2LO 6 2^ S.F. rS a J_5_3.2I2_*f T| <2.0^ A2 ^ X 1C3 » ■ <2.3. 4 ----/o No UAfLt>oo\/^^ NOv/. 12., \/A(2-V Ars/C^ I ' '•-• f--'-!?»• V^'*- ,-.V-•.■ "■■I'-i'.'w r ; / V * , J r * . City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 210_2_ _ _ _ _ A RBSOLUnON GRANTING A VARZANCB TO . .. MUNICIPAL XONIBG CODE , SECTION 10.22# SUBOIVXSION 2 FILE #1088 'i ^ • S ‘ V. :f Si.s ; F3 '' ■ ■'r ' •'^^r&^B^vfwHBIUBAS/Dale'j^^^^ "the applicant*) is itihe^owner of the property located at 4041 North Shore Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: ..-I '•1 ii i. 1 l-J * > Lots 7 and 8, and that part of the Easterly 11 feet of Lot 9 lying Northerly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the Westerly lino of said Easterly 11 feet with the Northerly line of said Lot 9; thence Southerly along said Westerly line a distance of 157.25 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence deflecting left to a point on the East line of said Lot 9 distant 217.3 feet Southerly from the Northeast corner of said Lot 9# and there ending, Highwood Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property*); and - * * .“1 •* S , ' *, , V- ^ ’ l' <4 'r .w V . t |t s. ■ *• '■ NBBRBAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the construction of a detached garage which will increase hardcover in the 75-250 ’ lakeshore setback zone in excess of the 25% hardcover limit normally allowed. ■ 'f • " - 'i .1 L fc . • * > \ “ ■ ’Vs , i*3 ' • ;*■ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, * i' » Minnesota t FiNDnKi;s 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning Pile #1066 •' i >■ ■ *> . '* * * ^ t-#. • - *. TtA * • • "w * v’ 2 2. The property is located in the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. : ,:vrW • • ■> t V I ,.,.4 * 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on November 17, 1966, and recommended approval of the proposed variance baaed upon the following findings: - - ■ i * • f • t -V* • . •'.■s.. A) The eteep slopes on the property make it unfeasible to locate a detached garage elsewhere on the property. *4 .A B) The existing 1-car detached garage is partially within the right-of-way of North Shore Drive. This garage cannot feasibly be expanded but is necessary for the applicant's winter vehicle parking when the driveway is impassable.•i r::;- ■'-C'-f* -. Page 1 of 4 ■*.. V •# * ' r 4V 4 ‘ I ; »• ■ 4 - *«•?• ■ •• - •>■• * • - • • . ***(•*■ I •♦ ;'.:•■•/ • VK. V ,1., . •*-V» f. '- •41 U»* •• • •» ^ VORONO/ City of OjROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2102________•»» Cl Existing municipal sewer lines on the property limit the potential locations for a detached garage. -» » J. t 4V,. V ■ .‘Z** * VvV'.C-ri.^v,* •.! r->D) Due to the steep slope up to the roadway and the limited sight distance, it is necessary to provide a backup apron iJ.near the house so that vehicles can travel forward up the hiii.:^;:V., -v- ' . : f ‘ • «. ■ •*V.. ■ ' ■ r * V ► .Vf fell -•\<v W I ^ 4» :The City Council has considered this application including . ^^**^^**9* ‘ ***4I recommendations of the Planning Commission^ * reports by City staffs comments by the applicant and the effect ■ of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. >c-r 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this soning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor-~ pose a fire harard or other danger to neighboring property; %rould' not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant,'but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is \ necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the' ' applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. !V ' k • i." I f* ; • •» -r,. ^ \V* • V«* » ^ COHCLOSXOilSp ORDER AMD COSDZTZOKS s Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the construction of a detached garage which will increase the hardcover in the 75-250* lakeshore setback tone to 28.6% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, subject to the following conditions! 1. Applicant shall remove the approximately 250 s.f. of plastic •heating west of the house. Hardcover allowed on the property is as follows I 0-75* Lakeshore Setback Zonet None 7S-250* Lakeshore Setback Zone; V .r;- % .'r, m ■ ; * • -wi •> -» •>» , f ■ . ■. r .. ,4 . ' -.T’* • • • V* • w i • ... Rousw West Sidewalk Front Patio Driveway Existing Garage East Sidewalk froposed Garage « • ♦ ' A .4* , >/#. • f Page 2 of 4 1,068 s.f. 60 s.f. 144 s.f. 3,308 s.f. 280 s.f. 215 s.f. 832 s.f. 5,907 s.f.:or 28.6% - T . >. % g * • 0* •V •• •• » . •* a:') .*• 4W, 9 J t, 7 > ' ♦ * * f ') i • • -------—^—"— ■ ^ • v:,' . I' (f t-;. ■ . , •_• •• •- .. ....... • — \ A 1 4 i •• • City of ORONO »*' •’■'. «. ?• ’■ 'A« * RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2^02______ I r-lr/ f.'f • • L» V, '**• w?.; • ^ ^625 • • f • iij»Vv:V*' • >*•■ 4‘ f. . »^ 75-250* Lot Area ,1a 20,»• il > ISSK^%%\VV.rVcVvVr%n^^^^^ ►'. iVf<^ Sy ’>Sh«tdeo*«r ,t' r- 9- AmIIcj *ii 2. AMU«nt .h.ll grant th. appropriate utility and acee.a ^•r eaaemMts for oxlsting lewor lines on the property. W' af'r /Sv *Vf 3 Tha existing 1-car garage located partially within the right- oi-wI5 o1 Norrt Shore Drive’ ia a ‘S*subject to the pertinent ordinances governing such structures. At 01 d &n«-Knr44-i(ka Granted by this variance run with the property J;t with the appuSaSt^b^^^^^ permiaalve only and meat be exercised by application for a building permit within ®"® ® the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire that date (December 8, 1987). « « .• r. IM t 5 Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and ":£ conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the r .# • 6. The underalgned applicant .V hiMll,*^agraea to the tenae of thle reaolotion and onhis hsirs# successors and assigns# hereby agrees to the recordi g of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. rI i.. i •• u December, 1986 ATTBiTt Adopted by the Orono City Council on thle 8th day ot ’ 8 A •% ■•> ■ a . ... •0 ‘ ^fothy IW'Haii.in, City Cleric Mary C. ^I^tler, Mayor\ •• % V-. • V r . %. *w. W ^ *. ► a V ! • ’ ■T?" K' • ei . I*- a* Page 3 of 4 f 4.% • is. li 4 fCITYof ^fBuilding Pennit * •hi -'i AND APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY j^fp,0. BOX 66. CRYSTAL BAY. MN 55323 473-7357 PERMIT NO. 6318' i*7DATE ISSUED jt «4' 1 t.-: r.. i X-;s*r ZONING DISTRICT L*K I'B. FIRE OERT*ENT ROST OFFICE VAR. DATE lOTARfA ■. -.v-^ ' 'fii /MOPOSEO SETBACKS R SIDti REAR L SIDE I CAKE WETLANDS jMo: ACCESS NEW AOCNCV^ XISTII atY COUNTY STATE PRIVATE EASEMENT ^40^/Site ADPRgSS ______________________________ PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NO IPIOI O'? ^ ^ lot______________BLOCK__________________ SUBDIVISION--------------------------- K%. ARCHITE^/ENOINF.ER -Mutt C#fl4^uM»-FGmilv. Commercail A lot (Phone) hr- >/7ji ^ • - ’ t (FIffW) i* S' • *‘‘7'■Jv.-'-l <r7'H'!•.T T V , *»7x* ,‘«Ty h* f 14 ' ^ ^ uMI*FemilY. Commeroel A Industrial Construction Plans (Ad^fetfi f. \ (Phone) BUILDER |Finn»lAdd'siti iPhonm TYPE OF WORK CONST. TYPE Addition V----- BUILDING SIZE L. 3 ^ W -2^ OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION DWELL UNITS OAR. STALLS ATT. DET. STORIES B 1 NUMBER OF BEDROOMS SEPTIC APP date PROPOSED USE COUNCIL APP DATE at 4JtnjiS^ ^ Estimated Construction Valuation PERMIT FEES BLOa PERMIT ^(ff ‘^0- STATE FEE PLAN REVIEW SAC CHARGE SEWER UNIT 3 ^£> PARK FEE penalty other TOTAL DUE 3^,^ 7v^^5liSMmfilJSS-D£SiGfiiSJCO-CiI^ “>* BEFORE FRAMING INSPECTION • a' ! r r ^ f'. A * I- ' • I INSPCCnON REQUIRED □ . . U . . FOOTINQ M«or* OM O ...... FRAMINO □ .^.... INSULATION □ .. . • . WAILSOAHO bMo>« IMMQ D..'... final bata* □ sni MSPEcnoN OUMBO INSPECTION VWU BE SUB­ JECT TO FENALTY. MSFECnONS MUST BE CALLEO-IN t« NOUNS IN ADVANCE. COPY WNITI Wit CANAMT4NSPCCT0N WOKK REOUIPINQ SEPARATE PERMITS FLUM0INQ..........................□ MECHANICAL ......................□ WELL....................................□ 8CFTIC.................................□ •EWER...................................□ WATER....................................□ CMUOINQAFfUtNa................ □ nut....................................□ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THE UNOERSM3HLO HEPFBV REQOCSTS PERMISSION TO MAKE THE REAL ■MPNOVEMENTS SREOriEO AND DECLARES UNDER PENALTY OF LAW ACKNOWIEDOEUENT AND ACCEPT­ ANCE OF ALL information conditions AND REQUIRE­ MENTS represented on this document the under - 8IONEO further AQREES TO DO ALL WORK IN STRICT COM- PLIANCE WITH ALL CITY OF ORONO ORDINANCES AND STATE OF MINNESOTA REMENTS iL OMtCN-FHHANCe OOtDFtCClFT .ae.iaie»MUi i:' ,C«W oi 0»c*«o % . CITY 0? ORONO ~ BDILDING PERMIT APPLICATION A- 5tal Fee; S Date Received: ii^ClwC Jm V cr• itered By;Permit ^: ‘JL INPORMATION MUST BE SOBMITTED IN FULL BEFORE PLAN REVIEW WILL BE STARTED (See Check-off List Enclosed) !B APPLICANT IS: (circle one) Ol'TOER orCCONTRACTO^ }B SITE ADDRESS: AoA 1 Mr>-V\s SKcr<t.___------------------- ZIP: (work) ^73- JIB OP OWNER:PHONE; (home) 4l 7 - LILJNG ADDRESS: 4D bAorVU CITY:----Q)rofNo Dr ut ^ ZIP: >NTRACT0R ^__________________PHONE; 4-14-11 n _ LILING ADDRESS; S Vc>Uer Orcl<L CITY; H><ceV%vc>r -------- ZIP; H PE OF WORK: NewRemodel/Alterati'^nDemo Addition_ _ Accessory Structure_ _ Move Renovate_ _ Land Alteration_ 3POSED WORK (describe in detail):~7 3RIES SQ. FEET OF EACH FLOOR: OF BEDROOMS:GARAGE STALLS: ATT.DET. LVBD CONSTRCCnON VALUATION (excluding land): $ 7$Q oreby apply for a building permit and I acknowledge that the information VL ll co^lete and accurate; that the work will be in inances and codes of the City and with the State Building Coue, that I erstand this is not a permit and work is not to start without a perm , a t the work will be in accordance with the approved plan- PLZCAHT'S SIGNATURE —-- DATE im ::i ‘I t>At—^ M <1-V lo/n/‘^t M • I -----------J------------------ ‘>1 ' ; n i: | ‘=\ 'l 4 AOPiTior^. j n 1 >'_ £X-V^lt-3^ ..- ----- ............... - ■ •" ■-—■r* ^ ii ii I 1 ' !‘ 1 1 Eiy:)5Tj*J6- ' ) 1» h / rn 1 i V 1 ^ t>»0<^ 1 f !! II >0 ' T ■ M*' ' __________.............................- \ _a— “® ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------■ ::i• dO 4^ ft •SToisr 6 "jc .^__._^4lS.. .p>e^WQ.o_o___ 2. )C ,G . ?^_es>A?- PEClCiNJCrL^fS IP _ f>)hA _^R.)P_:r^T0 HR-on)T'_ oF •t H.y>V^TlNJ6- dCK]ci(i,^T^ PATjo NisvP t> ec.K.-=—---------------— 11 :i PP^o _ -rp ft?u ) J-T___-I ___________g^TC J Cr^—-Jr f^o T —t£__ _P AT > 0,------------ _______:;L_„Xt1 15. _. 0 ^ ^ W A S Pa ^‘Jl^Pf^ _0^^) P.lPA Lr__B^Mi L o.lnJ^._. P.ua.>J I- , r '•II TT I! _w rtBrO _ AOauJO^J .WAi^__pa„i __—Ijvi VfiXJ'----------- \-r WA^ kJ^V^/C. Put P ____ftAlii= 0^rMAH- n \ r> vPo l nJ i __/Ooiaj P t^l"V j /sJ_(^r:i_JXX ^ 4t ♦.- I • • -r i: »■ >.u ■ - rr — lit ._...il lAjMa »» iHfcAU*irtiitJilurinrt^ / 4 L i- ■ I / u ^ SKETCH OfvJ PAG-'i -2^ 7 I 4 > l^“76 . ^ G ‘ c£fr^ ^ ic:^^ CAjvXi*^etA^ . • 2. f ”}4-0 .^"x XAJ^ CLy> CZ ti ^,5L_-C CTU^ <2-^1 14 ' »c 1 '^■ ^ ^i/r^ JiiucJ:^ fv^ '-k A jl^ j2oJuuXJiy^ , 14^ |i-^X (4-^ -------- . ___ aycrXlS JtlJJJ^ yZ?6t^ 7 ^X /4-* ____-£-yv^c<Ay xjj^^ ^4:<w <3^^2<i,...^c-r'_x-<^ ____ JU-<.^/L'. . Oi^>s^ ,-^SL.c-*^ ,X-iJ->r^ yj<n<C^ </w/^,£yJL,d/^ (T^^J-^ LuyClxS-’ (^/^y0-?O yC-yly*^>^''^^2^Ay ___ . ../Sr^^. ^<yr^^-j>Ayti^^VrN-^ ^ZZmJL' Jf .. 7yTO/W^ iy^/^iX-A JX ' /^-fyyyZZZpy-^i -------- - __CUd^Ai/->J^__ yC-Z.A'Z^A^ x A a -X - ^"ZX-CIA x T^ ^ytr^ ^ XJ'^ ^ ( ^ ^ / yr?1</l C’^i/C<<C4y^y' A~~. y?^<j^ ^WVy^MJc,. y<^C^«y^<-^ 4t,C.P v U7\JL9 ..A a Z^ cPy^’ 0 cZZA'^-X^ I u\fX, XZ^xXZj^ 'j^yyZZXu^ caa ^a A x 4SL.X^ C^yi^yvtf^' iifailiil <=Ui^ ;2>6^ m I _' C<_' — ^-“i^c/iMj'-i.Ay^ * C^ c\TlX^ __.. .»n.Jt^ / D 0 D cj’w^ ^ "7 i?> . I »• • 9 • • • #•• ^ ''C^<-' „^-c,<,xt,A,^-*-^ ^ jl-fx/ __ ... () . ^Wlf _________.-^o 4-1 yy-r^jU^ D> no o L.AKES1 oe ' ^ep.^P- p e<s»s , c^^P>-^ ^ P^TiO t>ooR- I «n fa APPtTlOPi • r- • • • • 6' fXT»« poO^ —«—I-----3 ' " ■ fi(*»OL/K)D L-6\^EU tcoM «!.«.€ re PATiO 1^"! fa 2.KIP STCR.'i CEPAR* PE<VC. F<i^P^JT oF . H 0 (-/ SE - WAUKCUT 5TvP.i-S-^^ --------iftiiMUdiJMl k r To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorser City Administrator 3 Fron:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:January 15r 1992 Subject:#1704 C. Arnold Carlson/Darlow Madge, 855/875 Forest Arms Lane - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Continuation Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB Pertinent Ordinances 1.Section 10.03, Subd. 19 - A conditional use permit is required for land alterations involving changes of grade within the shoreline of lakeshore property and for major alterations of a public drainageway. 2.Section 10.55, Subd. 8 - All land alterations within the lakeshore protected area are specifically prohibited. Applicant proposes alterations to a drainage ditch located within the 0-75’ setback area. The alterations involve the placement of riprap in the channel located within the 0-75' setback area. List of A B C D E F G H I J K Exhibits Application Property Owners List/Certificate of Mailing Plat Map Adjacent Property Owners Acknowledgement Hardcover Fact Sheets Map of Properties Located Along Forest Arms Channel Cook Report Survey of 855 & 875 Forest Arms Lane Existing/Proposed Site Plan for 875 Forest Arms Lane Drainage Easement Detail/Spec Sheet/Planting Schedule Topographic Survey of Drainage Easement by Mark Gronberg 10/30/91 Review of implication The Forest Arms plat was approved and filed in March of 1970. The drainage easement shown in the various exhibits was created at the time of the platting. This dr~.‘nageway takes the majority of run-off that collects at the lowest point of the road and along the east side of plat via a catch basin at the east side of Forest Arms Lane via a culvert under road ditch to Forest Arms Channel. Review Exhibit K. The City created the easement but failed to make the developer responsible for installing appropriate controls or facilities to !r-?intain drainage. Mr. Carlson has resided at his residence I r some 10 years. He Zoning Application #1704 January 15, 1992 Page 2 advised that prior to the construction of the new residence currently owned by Mr. Madge, there appeared to be erosion problems but they were minor based on the gentler slopes adjacent to the immediate spillway from the road. With the construction of the residence, major changes were made in the area of the drainageway resulting in severe erosion whenever it rained. Both owners report the velocity of run-off is intense during an average to major rainfall. Mr. Madge contacted the City seeking assistance in an attempt to resolve the erosion problems and was advised that if the Ci^ y was to make any improvements to the drainage swale that it weald involve a storm sewer improvement project. Mr. Madge was then advised that he could make the necessary drainage Improvements as long as they met the City's standards. Mr. Madge proceeded with a riprapping project Involving filter fabric and large rocks that were soon washed down into the channel after the first few heavy storms of last year. Mr. Madge's contractor returned to try again and now installed riprap with grout that extended approximately 100' from the culvert on the west side of Forest Arms Lane. This facility appears to be withstanding the heavy velocities of run-off. Unfortunately, this was not a method approved nor recommended by the City staff. The Zoning staff met with Mr. Madge and he advised that he wanted to proceed with the comprehensive improvement oi the channel area because erosion was still playing havoc with the remainder of the drainageway. Mr. Madge has filed a comprehensive application with his immediate neighbor, Mr. Carlson, that will involve the complete improvement of the drainageway. The current plan requests that the current riprap grout area be allowed to remain and that the remainder of the channel be altered to an 8' width at a 2' depth with riprap and filter fabric to be placed along the center portion carrying the majority of run-off. Review Glenn Ccok's report. Exhibit G, for his review comments and recommendation. Cook recommends the following: 1.Channel or drainageway should be constructed with Class 2 riprap (MnDot 3601) and filter fabric. 2.Work shall be completed in accordance with MnDot's Specification 2511. 3.Riprap shall not be grouted because of the potential for movement and Increase in hardcover within the lakeshore protected area. .ft' 4.Silt fence will be required between the lakeshore and construction area until vegetation is re-established. '■si Zoning Application #1704 January 15, 1992 Page 3 The applicant has filed the necessary permit application with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Prior to the City issuing a land alteration permit to complete the project, the City must be in receipt of the permit from the Watershed District. Hardship Statement Please review the application. Exhibit A. noted as follows: Hardships are 1.There were never any plans or improvements made to the drainage channel at the time the formal drainage easement was created with the approval of the plat in 1970. 2.Current drainageway cannot handle large rainfalls causing flooding in the back yards. Dead trees pose a hazard in windstorms and create hours of clean-up after 15 m.p.h. winds. As the drainage improvement already installed by Mr. Madge involves hardcover, the applicant was asked to provide a hardcover inventory of the property. Staff has briefly reviewed those hardcover facts and notes that the hardcover areas have been designated appropriately but staff cannot confirm upon a site inspection whether all hardcover has been designated because of snow cover. Hardcover is reported as follows: 0-75' setback area = 75-250* setback area 250-500' setback area 5.93% (this may be area of riprap) 4.66% 33.64% There is a 20* wide utility easement that intersects the lakeshore yards of the subject properties. The easement is not a sewer easement as the sev/er lines are located within Forest Arms Lane. The City must ask for documentation confirming that the appropriate utility company or agency has been advised of the proposed land alterations and that said land alterations will have no impact. Options of Action If application is to be denied, please refer to the necessary findings in the variance and conditional use permit sections of your code. If denial includes the removal of riprap/grout area adjacent to roadway, please provide a suggested deadline date for the removal of the facility. Zoning Application #1704 January 15, 1992 Page 3 If approved, your approval must contain the following conditions: 1. 2. Permit from the MCWD. All conditions noted by engineer in his report and as noted above. 3.Written confirmation that appropriate utility company/agent has reviewed plans and approves the proposed land alteration. 4. Any others deemed appropriate by Planning Commission. Isv . .(kT.; h II > d ■ ^ Am ^ .-tel I «r T> 11 ■ U a 1^ Ala A « ■ A a a n.r‘^ -vi.a-aB ^Biia fl-n« Ami'A'Tatffennra «#* hAk.« .. ■ CITY OP ORONO — VARIANCE APPLICATION , Initial Application Fee/$175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) fi PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 875 Fbrest Arms lane Orono, MN 55364 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)SRJcqj tW OF ORONO FINANCE OFFICE 1350200000 01 QEN 175.00 CHECK TL 175.00 RECEIPT-THANK YOU N227330 COOl kOi T16:2 10/25/9 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLIC2VNT Name Phone (home) 472-0459 D. T. Madge Phone (worlc) Same Address: Anrsi^City; Orono zip; 55364 OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City;Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property / X! ■ / Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 3800.00 Describe request in detail; Renpve dead trees on shoreline, fill holes, and srri rmor Rip rap 110 feet of drainage easennait with 6" to 8" clear bryant red limestcx^ ccancrete brushed over f-hp rrp nf rin mp. VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear) Other r' ' ■! - V-*. ISHIP .U -fj 0 L 7 I 'V »1-i!v\ >tliir 9 a 'U : V .;t3 Describe undue hardship or pracfical"^iJficulty re»iKLting^^om strict enforcement of zoning regulations; Drair^ge sasaiEnt not drainiriQ prccerly and urable to h andle rainfalls causirx? yard flooding. Dead trees pose a hazard in wind stjorms and create hcxirs of cleanup after 15 nph \aixir /i-1 ■ <.'ra IBSCRIPTION OF DNDSDAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements ; Eidsting drainage easemant poorly (iasiqned to Ivindle large rainfalls thus causiiig flcxximg in bade yard. ______________________________________________________________ -- IQUIREO SOBMITTALS Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application^ please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED, Phe Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the ^d30ve Jiformatlon has not been included. :ertification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete nitialed by Clerical Staff: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ kPPLICANT'S SIGNATURE Plie applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff cime not covered by original fee payment) and/or cOiisultant expenses Incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the in£ormati<^ supplied is/Ttrue and corxect to the be^ of his/her knowledge. CPtUky. Applicant's Signature OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and Agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga ­ tion and verificatiop^f this reque^ "4aDwner's Signature 'Q Date Applicant must have all sub^itt^^s into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meetings Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. I' « CERTIFICATE OP MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS. ) CITY OF ORONO ) It Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a renotification of a Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1704, was mailed to the attached list of property owners . In Witn*=''’s Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 15th day of January, 1S92. ‘m Jamie^Eosma i f 1 i i *: i F •* .' -5 if -j ;.fv;V RUN DATE 10/16/91 BATCH 009 f' PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR i» . I »• k \ PROP ADDR OltlER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR i A, • •?PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR J .PROP ADDR .O^tlER HMm TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR i V I ..'-i'• i ( I •r‘^- ? I I 4^ Lia a I * il ' HENNEPIN 38 07-117-23 12 0005 , 00830 FOREST ARHS LA i T K SAHUEL A A SAMUEL T K A A SAHUEL ' 830 FOREST ARMS LANE MOUND MN 65364 4 'i 38 07-117-23 12 0008 00038 AODRESS UNASSIGNEO FISCHER DEVELOPMENT CO - X ^ FISCHER DEVELOPMENT CO - I• 6801 N 150TH ST . APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 ; \ • <\ * t/ - < '• 'r A 38 07-117-23 12 0013 00855 FOREST ARMS LA C A C CARLSON C A CHARLEEN CARLSON 855 FOREST ARMS LANE MOUND MN 55364 $ • ♦ 11 « 36 07-117-23 12 0016 04265 FOREST LAKE DR HIM OLESKY HOHARD A MAXINE OLESKY 23346 PARK SORRENTO CALABASAS PARK CA I t 91302 * I r • i.' r < I : ) * • < k• • I * •• I ,* ' ’ U •f 6 » • COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY ONTCRS LIST 30 07-117-23 12 0006 00860 FOREST ARMS LA ROYETTA I MARCOTTE ROYETTA I MARCOTTE-SNOH 860 FOREST ARMS LA HOU4D MN 55364 38 07-117-23 12 0009 00805 FOREST ARMS LA G B BORROW AHA vJLPE GEORGE BORKOW/MARILYN VOLPE 805 FOREST ARHS LA ORONO MN 55364 38 07-117-23 12 0014 00875 FOREST ARMS LA 0 T MADGE ALA LEGER DARLOH MADGE 875 FOREST ARMS LA MOUND MN 55364 TOTAL BATCH 009 00010 ..'Y>5V* j kOT Mfl •REPORT NO. P1435401 PAGE 26 t j rA. 38 07-117-23 12 0007 00890 FOREST ARMS LA D J FARLEY A E C FARLEY D J FA aEY A E C FARLEY 690 FOREST ARMS U ORONO MN 55364 : \■ y. ■ i. » S” S--'-V. :■,! .V, 38 07-117-23 12 0012 ^ 00835 FOREST ARMS LA P E SCHNEBELE A V SCHNEBELE P E SCHNEBELE A V SCHNEBELE . 835 FOREST ARMS LA HOUND MN 55364 V ' 4.t P • ;V 'J '^1 38 07-117-23 12 0015 00895 FOREST ARMS LA F BROGHAM4ER A P BROGHAFtiER F BROGHAMHER A P BR06HAMMER 895 FOREST ARMS LANE MOUND MN 55364 ^ .4 * * >4 4 f ** 4 V ■V << I I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAX/kT;(ON» ID THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. ' ■ :* •■•Y/ ! ,'fcr>V , L ‘ '■ . ,'V'-••• ^ • ■ • •; ’ J ■ ; ' ’. -'f PARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAF^TION* ID THE BEST . ‘ i ||Jr. DATE • A I *. 4 .. •• . v> 7N • %»\*4^ \ « S • .aA • ^ ■ * « ’ * '*6' ' i t ' • *' • . * • V ■■-,1 m ■ii' ZO’9 75 »ES iy iT • ■ >•••■ !•••• ,.| I f • ooniD .„.LAKE :••«> fMT i >\ ^ (;ci )1 *. \ Li •• \ VU—>• \P—F r ■T (fO'•)\ LL..Lj&r Si- • • • ( & * • • «...A \ *iiit*it******‘*:****itit*ii*-**-*******it*ieit**** I (we) Smie and Qarleen Carlson flSS FTnnpgf» AyrriR T/^rva (print naxne(s)][print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 875 Porest Arms Lane_________• also referred to as Land Use Application No. _____. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare “approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date /V / ■»/ m HARDCOVER CALCULATIOf SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCL Existing Hardcover in Zone E one) 75-2b0*250-500' 500-1000' Total Hardcover in Zone A.Hniif^p X s __ S • r 1 LENGTH • • X WIDTH s S • t X . S.F. X S.F. X a S.F. B. r, \ (lARAGr X s S.F. RPI VPWAY X a . S.F, X S.F. • • n. ^IfnPWAi K X S.F. A# • . X S.F. X _S.F. E.’atio / )eck X .S.F. p.lANn5;rAPP 7*2-X 3 .S • F • AREAS UNDERLAIN RY 7 *X V a />^S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING _1 A X _/ c 3r-o S • F • X .S.F. G. Other X _a S.F. ill Total Property Area in Zone S.F. > 7 2 r"S.F.B B f o 'niA X 100 r ?% 1 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORK^. ^ SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75f 75-250"/ 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone — V Kt' I. I’ ’ k. ¥ . Xt A a <w/i ^ / A.House • X S.F. • • LENGTH X width S.F. X _____ S.F. m « X S.F. X s S.F. B. D riveway i ^X /3 S.F. C.X S.F. X S.F. 0.Sidewalk X S.F. X S.F. X . S.F. E.Jatio / D eck X 3 .S.F. F.Landscape ♦ X //C S.F. AREAS underlain BY /^.r*X s.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X . s.F. X S.F. G. Other 3o X *=?/ S.F. 9 y 312-/ • Total Hardcover A IN Zone / . 2_d S.F.A Total Property Area IN Zone «r-» s.F.B A,47^6^ .^ C 4 B X inn =. V. /j ^ % ,■»'-------»<»->. r. - mT.I H>II* ■>- i ..4":HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250^ 250-500'^ 5C0-1C00' Existing Hardcover in Zone A. House B. Garage *\_ _ _ _- c. Driveway — length X X tf Li WIDTH 9- ? ___( 9 — 4“/ *D 2-L X /Y 3 J fir X n A-AM III ^ /V/ A X / d S ? a___' ------------- X y- 7 ur 2—X / 7-^ < X / 3 JF.ir IL 70 .___ D. Sidewalk / - X E. Patio/ Deck 7 X V- yc ^ X /^ /r2^ J9o F.Landscape areas ^X _ y 6 r ZiTl o iliT y sri underlain - BY PLASTIC SHEETING ‘"3uo X _j2_ y jr X _3I- i *»'• *** *c li. X ? i±Xl3Zi yr- G. Other y ji. y jl2s X y jJtJt •7 JU TotaC Hardcover in Zone - 2-t fc r, r/f. s* Total Property Area in Zone S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. . S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F S.F. S.F. S.F S.F.B F ✓// . -rD -r i^P.ur X 100 = i i V w To I tillriri^iinJiff iiriiiitiiiiiAifnftfiii "ATTACHMENT A" PEFUIT *92-6007 DARLOW MADGE FOREST arms LAhii CMAHKEL roF Y.lEV/ lay ou '-|- SCALE: 1" “ 100' PRESENT WATER LEVEL 927.^1' AS OF A/16/91 • (MCWD) PROPOSED BOLLOM ELEV. » OF CHANNEL - 923.6' I \ PROPOSED BOTTOM ELEV. \ \ OF boat SLIPS - 92A.6' N A & !«4 B ARNOLD CARLSON PRESENT WATER LEVEL ORDINARY HIGH WATER LEVEI^V^ \s '--V^N’3'-'' NATURAL SHORELINE PRESENT WATER LEVEL LEGEND ORDINARY HIGH WATER LEVEL - PRESENT WATER 1 FVPI PROPOSED AREA TO BE DREDGED - - rv,'-' JUMttll....^ "ROCaVED ■ Rr:6K>M VI •f^.V/ATERS PROPOSED BOTTOM WIDTH OF CHANNEL IS 15' WITH 5'/I' SIDE SLOPE UIORZ./VERT.) 923.6' T^Or^EST" t\cco AcecV^.cN^-'3. I I. ^ i Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & |\J| Associates Engineers & Architects OQO G lonestM tedet W. toier& JdMOh C A «llh. H. Mifvfn I SorvM. f Vhff. n Gw t. ceoA n. ThC.-'tt I N0>tt FX ccoen G Scnwr.<ni ft M. EbcfUn CFA ICcJtn A. Gmsoa Ibew w fom. fj C FE. Jn A. Bouftm FI Mim A. Njnson. FI TW iC. F^4 Ft Micnjcf T, HiutmiftA, f| tehCft F. FWtrtC. FI. Giv 4 C UP«U. FI T^om#J w Feetfjofi FI, MlChK! C FX Jimtl I Mjuna F8. Kwcm F. Anoefioa Ff. Mjrk t Ml Ft Meit C FttM A ia r^omul AnguL Ff Hcw|.<c A SirMl Ft DK hci Jl Wgrtoa Ft Ma#t A seG F| FFUp A CiJwtil Ft Martina Ft MlA a WilFi Ft Thorrm t -.nomon A lA Gory F ffywr. Fl Mm I •§. I Fninp Cfdvti rfli Ft Me C AIA AgneiM ling. AiCF Jtr^ 0 Fe/«n f f Cfcino O^Mfc Ft Mrt t 0!t^QM At GJ<y w Vontn. Ft Kaftn I Wiemcn. Ft t nm Ft C^4nM A tfintsoA Uo V fswettiry Ninon M OW January 14,1992 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Re: File No. 139 • 1704 Darlow Madge 875 Forest Arms Lane Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the proposed plan for upgrading the drainage swale off Forest Arms Lane. There is a concrete swale constructed from the culvert outlet for approximately KK) feet. The plan would be to construct a rip-rap drainage channel from where the concrete ends to Lake Minnetonka. The proposed channel cross section is 8 feet wide and 2 feet deep. The channel should be constructed with Qass II Rip-rap (Mn/DOT 3601) and filter fabric. The work shall be completed in accordance with Mn/DOT Specification 2511. The rip-rap should not be grouted because of the potential for movement and increase in hardcover. Silt fence will be required between the Iake.shore and construction area until vegemtion is re­ established. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:li 139.cor r I . « fr •? » 4 <.1 4 II r » • 4 ' / •» ‘ f frt 1 ** » " -• ‘ • i t >. .. i- 1 ♦ •• ir.1 4 i i-{*,i f i 1 , » 1..'*.’ I . :<t '. * ‘ it 4 »* • > 4 *, ( M-,, • . v» • I ^ r * .*' »•. 1,^ .1 5 * 4 '1 » »f |.r I^ •• I *I. f ■ ^t*/ i-.- !• -V a* /u.id - /-.jr > > -< „• TSfcl£> t4 1?| t> - La-h:-.gr^ wum I'6'■ <r^i t-at/ of- - rfij/.*'/-.?—1 r i ; ' t J^Tt\ Lt-i- 1^ __ A > ♦ iC-r^'^-y i\t .I i4 —. '/ L l I m Vi _~^^S-ELi2^1LJbLix f.-r . ..j cv ■.£cji.i.^i;-:.„. La_________________ • vf M; m »AfiLE A -To l?c. / .. „ ------ --------^^»TH j^CiS—XKau(rHoO-r^ A-gt=^ -p ....... " «!■ I f_ •f i I nmi/i—iiiUi—e.o£f^ r,.r^gi t, ^/ ^^ /L,.. J -r* ^ »N. a . V% . . . 8 h ^ j,-jr. .,/vinT■<- <h ■Pgtaif^r (^u.UT'ri Tn 7Brilia J_.£B.^ai^ *i ^ i %(?c; Dc __^EiA li 1 kr o ri' '7 ._A__-----’E±\LLi\'-\ .......... .. li T2ij i- ' vii- v< = ' \o •1/D fA A 1 Ci u 1 ir E XA'J/ 1/ i7^ 1 r (?"2tv?-tiA O’l.-'A* 1 2jo H X ------A."__________A .-. 1 2.h O' If 1 — ■ —^,V/a>a^^ d M ■_■/ ^ i'*U\ 1 ^1 L 19 M h- ^T^ty/IJ,\ t’ i. ^ J J> /“V V ^/l :i.- 1 , j N ---------^l-p//jp fi? A »s/'l 1 Vr-i'O A <'''uK_ A^/\^-i_ti "i (•*P 1 p ^ M ^;V A Vlio *.tf j f"f* 1 n -A.-----Sr^tEltnCU Ail. a 1 -A'5 ------:rr-^Ct4?c.T C 0 _.. AT, ,-ip i -, m rJ V'i ^ | -r•_C2),\-r (^'i/A..., 1 U--,.,Pv;as‘ »■ .irT'j.: u - £ y.-,,, ,,, ^ Tl 5* . !— ■ ■ T^.lT 1 "j '■! J!1 V I I- 1’^ »i» >t I J' •’I i •‘f ♦ I ‘4 ! H'' H *1 I ih . yi£» ■ ,/-4; '■:?'4 4fc • . j '.[SL:.’ i' > : L. Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Froos Date: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator January 10, 1992 Subject: #1705 Christopher Smith, 3650 Casco Avenue Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (B) — Entire residence structure shall be located in front of the average lakeshore setback line (review Exhibit H). List of Exhibits A - Application B - Neighbors' Acknowledgement Forms plus Approval Letters C - Property Owners' List D - Plat Map E - Certificate of Survey P - Hardcover Fact Sheets G - Building Elevations/Floor Plan H - Sketch of Average Lakeshore Setback Line Description of Request During the preparation for the filing of the building permit application, it was determined that an average lakeshore setback variance would be required. Because of the delays presented by the limited holiday meeting schedule, the applicant/owner made a formal request of the Council that would allow staff to issue a foundation permit for the new construction. Applicant had already filed the variance application for the January meeting. Council denied the special request because of the issue of negative precedence setting and that the application would be scheduled for Council's action at their January 27th meeting involving merely a two week delay for owner. Review Exhibits C and H. Because of the configuration of the adjacent lots, an average lakeshore setback variance would be required for any plan to reconstruct a residence cn the subject pj^operty and meet all other required setbacks. Please review Exhibits F and G. No other variances are required. Note that excessive hardcover within the 250-500' setback area already ®3cists. The hardcover within the 0-75' :sone is an existing sidewalk and stairs. No changes ar^ proposed. Applicant should be advised that any plans to alter existing improvements within the 0 — 75' setback area will require building permit and such improvements will be limited to the approved standards for lakeshore access stairs. • — •JT' •J » AH. r-- Zoning File #1705 January 10, 1992 Page 2 Hardship Statement Please review Exhibit A. Applicant notes the following hardships: 1. Configuration of adjacent lots - lot to immediate south has a platted corridor and is classified as a riparian lot subject to average lakeshore setback standards. 2. If average lakeshore setback line standard was to be upheld, the lot would be technically unbuildable. 3. Proposed construction will have no impact on the viewing windows of the residence to the immediate south. 4. The adjacent neighbors have submitted letters approving the proposed construction. Please note in your approval recommendation to include the notice to the applicant concerning improvements within the 0~75' setback area and that such improvements require building permits from the City of Orono. Isv ■4 . ■ < L NOV— IS — Tue 16:2<4 SCHUU TIES A >1105^ CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION n Jk ^ .V# TA'Vt,initial RpoUeatlon , , ~, i ($50,20 par each additicnal variance) / / Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) ;^ftor-the-ract Pees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Attach^legal description to application if n(j*t included on required survey. Identification Number (P.I.D.) JUM.R . O 135Wm£E^\Of£i^^.OO j /■rkj O 11 115, *-'•LhuLh i im i / W* • V if Lir CTuT^TUAkik’ Vm Inuci-ai I iiimtn /t.'c/ 4 V* *■ C' 4 v-'*i f*i*»^*r f yr*» f r M • 11/26A applicant Name Phone (home) 4^C-lb2^ phone (work) ~S79-^T^O . Address! City; ^A,;ve-^»\\CQ, Zipt— OWNER (if different than applicant) K(f£'V^ l*fT57v\x2.‘S Name Address:^41 City; Date Property Acquired \ PhonJ (home) ^ pjhcne (work) * Zip: ^v‘~)4x3 4^ __ (inonth/year) I (do) ((^do^no^) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT OSB OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District LR-1 C. Present Use of Property Other DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST j^esidentia^ (specify) Describe request in detail: C-T-sse_Ll^sxii.* Estimated Construction Cost $ h2^,C>c>0 VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width frontSetback Variances (_____ Other AtV/c^ __ Hardcover Side ______ Rear) NOU IB *91 15:20 B1270S ‘S155 p43E.00S I NOV— 1® — 91 TUE SCHU, l_T IJE S _ r' 4 i» V. I BARDSBIP or practical diffic o? zoning r=,ula.ion^=^^^ OEScapTioN ^ _ conditions t_ B C IIS^ R - d T l TJ . vj ■ii,.;. ^ ^alty resulting rrcni s^-ic- t> K>W rt-<ezlj------------------ IPTION OP UNDSDAL 4^.005 prevfs Oescrlba unusual Cod« Requirements^ ~ ,iwer-i» I I I ^'i ‘ ‘ I ' ' ' HEQUIRPU sdbmittals 1/ Completed Application Form ^ ^ „ 9 ^ Ji T5 v»r^*^JeT*4" V ting conplla^cG with Zoning . ".ttv iV>.nn uccsss (nf- jM 1 I 1^ ■ I * |ii i I’l ^ I REfi SDBMITTALS ttaNdC-rs Completed Application - owne-s Wlthrn 15ff' (you must obtain certified Property Department o'< Finanee A-603 Govt Center this list from Hennepin County Departme ..ji,w »v»»rtiiAr’'tv owners li:>t). t«vt4,{^erec 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Information has not he.«n includ^^_ _ __ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE nrovide all information required or The applicant hereby ^^rees to pro additional foes (staff this application. Please -----if tlto abw Applicant’s Signature irrect to the be SintnerTe’r”^y eoKowledges crt^VtVfi:" connult.nt,, authorizes council member! for purposes of Investiga-aaentSr Commission members» ana tion and verification of ^que9t> owner's signature __ Date is application and further Date ((“^ /? -?/-------— 'y'Vffices 25 days before the ;;;ii«;7mu's"hpv «ii •“j”^«*.^’„j^fcoi^issi^ .rVh.id on Planning Comnleslon "»etlng. present at all scheduled third Monday of each . **’?j;^.jlon and bomcll. H e" appUueet isrenin* Beetlnga of the planning Cazni.sion m „ts to have an unable to ettend a acheduled nee n^ Building a lor.ing tiirch^n^rprlor^'to th^ meeting. N'OM'18 '91 15:23 S1279541BB =»P3E.007 aAjVciee;! Ic-h <iu4.tU VtV ?<. Plat Map (obtained with '.sed surveyor) to include in^xisting grade are X copy 8W-xll-). Sketches or plans of ® A ^niease'attach a separate list of As an addendum to this ®PP -a-ipied of thli application, any other persons you wish a?a£f. Additional items as may be requested oy uxi-y • >«<v cx 'si u.0.c£i_L u OitLD jifM* • * ||j CVono 45^ • •• I • . • 1 ^e- p. «N-^ ^ 4X.n -w^ 'Hin ^ ouinaT" tfi Pl^ti/^ locachs^;'. o^ l«u^ i|, ifoe> , 4^«cV, p^'.aiX =^ Koi^ I '■\ a^<^.tA/^V Aw ■Hv«, [oc ^^c M-aA- ios’o 6. !:;^l«A4fce. \<5* <^‘Ce>Axt '‘HlA'h ^ CLUC<. iiU-OC^/'^ “PtriCUw ‘Hte, ft,U dn "VK a ^ fATC-ti TKtt, ao€jt^e„ ‘‘I •i* I « M i:i ^ Kast ^ 4i^O0«A-ACJC. loO.Vt^i' <5t4“CLfljfcc© ^0€-nu^, t>\~>AvkoT^ AS H- r€ia^lr:. •{» ^hof.6«i^ fe,a.-A'»7 ^ ^ 4^,^^ <*f 3C»^0 d,i,^ 4ufi/?i(e.. •• :.i ^VieA** •.» !.{ lit i'*111 •• •. 4«( * *' »jl •«• • « »• • ii; »*•##%# • *g :i •••«••«•• • I# :• li* • • • • • I * ;!. ,.» * • L 2C0’30yd £i:3Sina« INBUiiSSriKI WOdJ P T : i; I I G , gl? CON •v! ■ ilOV ci 'ii IxioS D.C.EELL WOFLD I <W« Mjacont Pr^arty JA/yt^<: vL!W P.3 ■ e>- [ptlnt ] hav® rivicwt^ tb® plan^^^ tha propo* prcpfSty iocattd at Application Ko« -« 7n r j^Xc. 0 acicaavi^igesmt 7ora A-OFi print KidreaaJ $ sd laprolsmont or propoaed usa of tha *; »o referred to aa Land use X (wa) uadaratand that In axacutiay thia (ato) not askad to dtclara approval oi but oaxaly to confire for tha City C tha iaprovettont plana and that tha rebuffta council Mproval diaapprtval of tha property or use jnncil that I (ve) am (are) aware of propoaef neighbor's project or use Proper ti* owner »fi«**«*»*«eee*ee*eee Z (we) aeJcaowledgenant, l (we) am I Qt to - {print na»e(a)]. have raviewad tha plans for tba propos property located at ..... Application Mo. _« 1 (we) underataad that in areevtin^ this acJcnowladgement, I (wa) am (art) not ae)ced to daolara-approval o but atrely to confirm for the City C the improvement plana and that tha raquixas Council approval. Property Owner [print ‘addraea ] sd improyoment or proposed us« of tho ____■* a'lso referred to ae Land Use dleapptoval of the property or use mneil that I (wc) an (are) aware of proposed neighbor's project or use p]at Property Owner If you have any information that nay as^Lat the City in tha review of thle land Oee Application, plaaae euk nlfe youG eenmenta to tha Building * toning Office at leaat 10 days prior t|> the eyheduled nooting date. NOV 18**91 iSiSd } 6127854186 PASg.aiw ' CO0 • S'oyj J '>r e • V.’ D J 20 November 1991 'm. z 2 1991 Mr. Mike Gaffron Assistant Zoning Administrator City of Oono Box 66 Crystal Bay Road Orono, Minnesota 55323 Re: Varijmee for Building Permit for Christopher and Mary Smith at 3650 Casco Avenue Dear Sirs: We are the owners of the property at 3630 Casco Avenue, the property adjacent to the referenced property on the south and west sides. We have reviewed the proposed location of the house to be built on this site. The house is proposed to be located approximately twenty feet from the north property line (aligning with the north wall of the existing house) and a minimum of twenty-two feet from the southwest property line. This location is five to six feet northeast of the location originally shown on the site plan. A sketch of the proposed location is enclosed. We feel that this proposed location will not adversely affect our property or views of Lake Minnetonka, and that it will minimize damage to the large trees existing on the site. We have no objection to this location. We encourage you to grant an average lake setback variance to the Smiths for the house at this location and allow them to proceed immediately with construction. Building during the winter months will lessen the impact of construction on the trees. Sincerely, :: nlzclv Kerry Graffunder Date: cc: Christopher J. Smith l-.c.cc-uL WOrLD Prop«rty owners I (ve;^ P.3 AcJencwiedgeaent 7ora • e>- fprint aame<t)] h&7e reviewed thm plans^^for the propos property located at *^bSb _ Application Ko. Z (we) understand that in exeeutfin? this {are) not asked to deelare approval oi hat Barely to confirm for the City C the laprovemant plans and that the req^ulres council ^proval. td inprov a; /loFt print address} sment or proposed use cf the so referred to as Land use aeknovledpenent, X (we) ant disapprbval of the property or use uncil that I (we) am (are) aware of neighbor's project or usepropose|l Property owner • • Z (we) (print name(s)] have reviewed the plans for the propos prop-rty located at Application Mo. . (print ‘address} I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, x (we) am (are) not eeked to deelere’*approvsl oj disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City c mncil that Z (wo) an (are) svare of the improvement plane and that the (^repoeof neighbor's project os use d' improyement or proposed use of the ___'‘a'lso referred to as Land fse requires Council approval. Property Owner Property Owner Mto I Zf you have any information that nay assist the City in the review of this Lead Oee Application# pleese sutmit your eemaente to the Suilding sZoning Office at leeet 10 days prior t Nbu‘i8 »9i isies rt?0 • 3!)y-j > the agheduled meeting date- 6i2?85ait5 Pfl3£.ai4 r RUN DATE 11/22/91 BATCH 001 r'--V *• m- I f r*. . 1^... i * a • \ * h * k \ * *• •« i {• • ,1* i \ \ \ HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST ' I I « # i AiAmhA • ♦; t. ^1 I t ’I i f ** *i* REPORT NO. P14S5401 PAGE Z ,1 ■> I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOMLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE I i|35|'1| „,^0 SMu> i I ' * » ^ - #« .* A t * i itf I O.N I V (■' . O' V 'V- •: * /*“ * .y 'ii •« ^ I ■ -■« ,v 1 #:. RUN DATE 11/22/91 •i Vr -** BATCH 001 PROP ADDR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR t • PROP ADDR 0»#4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR • - I • ! PROP ADDR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAI«/A00R '.1 PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR / • • •» 4 ' * 1 » • 4. i. • ' * ♦r ' p ; » i # f I • r I- HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST 38 20-117-23 31 0002 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ROY SCHRADER ETAL ROY SCHRADER 3704 CASCO AVE HAYZATA m 55391 41. I i ’7 t, :’>v-38 20-117-23 31 0021 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF ORONO park . 4/13/79 ST DEED 156754• »' ■■ 38 20-117-23 31 0031 S 02914 CASCO POINT RD ' * * DIM PRICE DAVID H I MARY J PRICE 2914 CASCO POINT RO * MAYZATA MN 55391 c 38 20-117-23 31 0041 03630 CASCO AVE P GRAFFUIIOER I K GRAFFUNOER PETER I KERRY GRAFFUNOER 3630 CASCO AV HAYZATA HN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0062 02740 CAROLINE AVE D F KETCHER IDA KETCHER DONALD F KETCHER 2740.CAROLINE AVE HAYZATA MN 55391 I > 4 ■ » ? ;; I .44, > ^ I • % . " ' * . • I 4 f • • V 5 *' MJb/WII I IlMurM- --------- . f 38 20-117-23 31 0004 03703 CASCO AVE CARLOTTA F GABLES CARLOTTA F GABLES 3703 CASCO AVE HAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0027 00038 ADDRESS UTiASSICNEO STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF ORONO PARK 4/13/79 ST DEED 156754 38 20-117-23 31 0039 03704 CASCO AVE ROY SCHRADER ETAL ROY SCHRADER 3704 CASCO AVE HAYZATA MN v5391 38 20-117-23 31 0042 03600 CASCO AVE RICHARC J HAEFELE I HIFE RICHARD HAEFELE 3600 CASCO AVENUE HAYZATA MN 55391 TOTAL BATCH 001 00013 38 20-117-23 31 0030 02918 CASCO POINT RD RAYMOND J FRANKENFIELD RAYMOT4D J FRANKENFIELD 2916 CASCO POINT ROAD NAVARRE MN 55391 '•J' .* • 58 20-117-25 51 0040 05700 CASCO AVE J H OONGOSKE/P A OONGOSKE JAHES H > PATRICIA OONGOSKE 5700 CASCO AVE HAYZATA MN 55591 58 20-117-25 51 0045 . 05650 CASCO AVE CHRISTOPHER J SMITH ET AL CHRISTOPHER J SMITH 5650 CASCO AVE HAYZATA »tl 55591 . . • % 4. r • « #. ^ ? • If *♦ I ' • 4 . i- t. r\ ^ 4 d t I • ‘ #=' • 4 ‘ ■ i‘ Ui. ^ \ * 1 • • • K: %^ * • * *^* * • « A REPORT NO* PI4354Q1 * ' . f V f . PAGE 1 , •■-4r . ^ 58 20-117-25510005 05709 CASCO AVE f ‘h *% *« ft' ■ ■ . ■ 't * , * ROBERT PRESLER . J * i ROBERT PRESLER • .^ r ' 4 , , 5709 CASCO AVE *4' ^ -4 .-tHAYZATA MN 55591 * ‘ • • ‘fy , • .4 . ■ 1 • • k V. € •k • i * ; • . \ i.k -t n« • • zr// HARDCOV^a .CALCUUTIOM WORKSHEET SEV3ACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 75"2I Existing Hardcover in Zone 250-500' 5G0-1000' A. ■ House J. B. Garage c. Driveway E.^ATIO/Deck F,Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY ■ . . PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other length ............ • mm ^ m * • » »• • « . D.. Sidewalk _- X • • • • ir* X X X X WIDTH X _ Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone 2<P5 2^S 4-«B 79«P<? X 100 - .. • •• S.F. S.F. • • S.F.0 S.F.-s • J S.F. •1 • • *n S.F. . -m ■ S.F. 0• ............)• •. .i -* S.F. • •.7 ^ L-5• s.'f. • S.F. • S.F. . S.F. • S.F. . S.F. • S • F • •• S.F.• • S.F.• . S.F.A 1 S.F.B S. -S’/ % meta tiiiilliBiittnriiiii ■ f>ii I 4 i • ••* -T/V/f// . HARDCOVER .CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE OiNE) 0”75' (^q-25Q^ 250-500 Existing Hardcover in Zone 500-1000' £tHTiK>0- Tfi SrAffiJ E. Patio/ Deck F.Landscape x AREAS underlain BY . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ X plastic SHEETING _ _ _ _ _ X • • • • c. Other • HniKP 'y 29^0 S.F. LENGTH •• width » • ♦ • X s • • • • _ S.F. . # • • * ♦•X . • • . . _ S.F. • ••• • • •• •X =S.F. • Pon. CM X • 320 s.p. B. (lARAf;? • • X ... S.F. , • • mm • m - • m • • • • • .*•**•• r. Drivfway # X • • 3020 S.F. * •* ' ••X • • S.F. • • • n. SinFWALK lMoeowo\X rr • /33 S.F.' / J2.S.F. S.F. 27^ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone - _ Total Property Area in Zone - - 2 7. X 100<ry V / -r B __££4Vs.f. 2.7.7 aa S.F. . 29.70 Aft/ f' •• f'' 1 B % M • . •• • *•1 » . • A ffb- —II f nr I i ». • • CN^/S SA\/TH V. ^ 1 Vtf % 4 ^ VIlf iiiw^v' • •r*'’ fi' ^ SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) Jll IlW \»\vJi*WU.I 0-75' 75-250'(250-500^ 500-■1000'P' Existing H ardcover ih Zone ♦ • At HniisE • S3 S.F. LENGTH «• WIDTH • • Y S3 • • • • •S.F. • . # • • • X • S.F.• . . • •• •• • • • X S • S.F. 1 • X • SS • •• • S.F. ilH-ni • B. Garage • X ____ • S.F.kr.-rzTiti g • • mm m m * 9 9 •««»• m • . • • «• r «\ « c. D rivev /ay • X • • • /S^O S.F. it rvr* • ( . ■* • # ' .-j•• • • •X m • • S.F. • • • D. Sidewalk ’X • • •• S.F.p......\ «> ^ • • m • • • 9k • X S3 •S.F. i ./ t • . / ?v • Vl\ " J A • • • X mmm • • S.F. ■ E.Jatio/ . Deck ...• • • * X 9 SS . • S.F. • p.Iandscapp • X • • • S.F. # areas underlain RY • X . • • S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING • X • S.F. , —•—-------------------------- • • 1 • #r* ‘ » • X SS • . S.F. • • • G. Other X S3 S.F.• • • Total H ardcover IN Zone /s^o . S.F.A Total Property Area ih Zone n- fs&o .4 2 3 to S • F •B B 2 X 100 - ^ • •• . . M .,•••• To;Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Frcmz Date: Subject Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator January 13, 1992 #1707 Jack F. Rhode, 1690 Shadywood Road Renewal Variance - Public Hearing List of Exhibits A B C D E P G Application Plat Map Property Owners List Planning Commission Minutes 1/22/91 Council Minutes 1/28/91 Resolution #2921 Approving Application #1614 Partial Packet Application #1381 Review of Current Request Mr, Rhode has applied for a third renewal variance; the original variance application was approved in 1989 (File #1381). The applicant proposes no change from the original application. Resolution #2921 expires January 28, 1992. Briefly, the application involves the construction of a new residence using the foundation of the former residence. The existing principal structure is located 55' from the lakeshore. The new principal structure shall be 61* resulting from the removal of grade level cement understructure. The improvement does involve expansion of the building envelope approximately 15* northward within the 75* setback area resulting in 177 s.f. of new principal structure or hardcover and 35 s.f. of upper balcony area. With concurrent removals of existing hardcover, there is an overall reduction within the 0-75* setback area of 114 s.f. or 1,9%. Hardcover within the 75-250' setback area is proposed at 24.85% (Increase from 2,290 s.f. or 19.7%). For more detailed Information on the original review, please review Exhibit G, the partial packet prepared for the first renewal variance in 1989. Both the staff memo for Application #1381 in Exhibit G and the approval resolution. Exhibit F, lists the required variances for the current application. The resolution sites the necessary findings and conditions for approval. Isv 1 CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 peir eacn Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 #" CITY DF CROmcniMirc nzrjrc I lltmturi. i/f I SUU aARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting rrcr: srrict enforcement of zoning regulations:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:- - - - --- - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - 2. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1, Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8*5"xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8J;"xll"). Slcetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8, The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above ■information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies t.hat the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga ­ tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date /9/_ _ _ _ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Plamning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is u.-.able to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. • I •DR ***••-. O S * ^-W No.51) '^ -X /^« 2 _____ OSoo) jpy^ ^fp 01 (o) 5 ■i f4iU Z1 I t I (»♦) I i, (?D MAPLEGATE iivsi i?i‘ ■'■"f^T ir.ofc i~nriTcr i^rv't J;t I INLEr («\ A'^'J ‘ u.. r \\ii ;>’*' -1- : RD ^ Cw itte 12 '* /T - O >i / ! 1*0 "^^g4otf,l[yV\ . \f-;'L7 ??:; r-^—IV i<<* !A. \ -J.’' / Nt' , ‘ -r Njl .'■ X<> N' V y -I'* ^o\ (^1 v\^ -v-T.r7 ^ ^ 21 1 L-P ■» 0*) -k°Qfl -r—-sNi-tr T J V-, ; «7 V3>*^ //•., «r 1 4-«# ,^- \ \ i * v RUN DATE 11/10/66 BATCH 002 PROP ADDR OUNER MAHE TAXPAYcR HAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OUNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADUR PROP ADDR 0I6IER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR i_ 38 17-117-23 21 OOD*! 01679 SIIADYUOOD RD RICHARD 0 HORUH i UIFE RICHARD IIORUM 1675 SHAOVIIOOD ROAD HAYZATA 55391 38 17-117-23 21 0015 01670 SHADYHOOD RO THOHAS R SAREHPA ETAL THOtlAS R SAREHPA 1670 SHADYHOOD ROAD HAYZATA ICI 55391 38 17-117-23 21 00»8 01710 SHADYHOOD RD HARRY L HEYER ETAL DALE C PALM 1710 SHADYHOOD RO HAYZATA MN 55391 HEmEPIH COUtITY PROPERTY IHFOPMATIOH SYSTEM PROPERTY 0UHER5 LIST 38 17-117-23 21 0005 01719 TAGERHESS POIHT RD LAUREEH E DARLIHG LAUREEH E DARLIHG 1719 EAGERHESS POIHT RD OROHQ HH 55391 38 17-117-25 21 0016 01680 SHADYHOOD RD JOHH G DOLEHAH ETAL JOHN G DOLEHAH 1680 StlAOrllOOO ROAD HAYZATA TUI 55391 38 17-117-23 21 0019 01720 SHADYHOOD RD H A J KEEHE HILLIAM H & JAHICE H KEENE 1720 SHADYHOOD RO OROHO HH 55391 REPORT HO. PI635<i01 PAGE 9 38 17-117-23 21 0019 01650 SHADYHOOD RD K H ROELOFS ETAL K H ROELOFS 1650 SHADYHOOD RO HAYZATA HH 55391 30 17-P7-23 21 0017 01690 SHADYHOOD RD JACK F RHODE JACK F RHODE 3155 NORTH SHORE DR HAYZATA HH 55391 TOTAL DATCH 002 00C08 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESEITTED ARE AH ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRFSEHTATIOH OF IHFORMATIOH AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE OH THE RECORDS OF THE HETBltPlH COUNTY DEPARTHEMT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO TTTE BEST OF MY KHOHUOGE AMO BELIEF DATE ,;;v,Ci?x;... ■•- .. • I • ' * ,: ^ ' 'tjx0.i.-: "- • *. *'■ ' •. ORONO ! '-(iSii' ■"• -' •% -* •1613 OEMSEN ROMES, ZHC. 315 TO^KAWA ROAD CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT/- Mr. Jim Jensen was •. •; -.i- .-r • '.^ • V--. Jf^ \ I ■■ ■ ■■: v / . ■; .,. ■ •• • '*■» .rf ^ • •**■'.. v r * Kelley opened the Public Hearing at 7:29 pim Staff to make a brief presentation. Mabusth provided a synopsis of the issues involved with this application, as sot forth in her January 14, 1991 memo. ' She’I-TX'.f • • *■ 7m*— • I ► • -• •.' *■ .•wV' «r. • > •** •' i-. # f 4 • • s « * . *>• .•*; •f .*>‘ " • *4 ^ 1 -*:V.. -s A .^9^ . •*% • V-/ ' -c‘ - ^ It * • • * * ‘ stated that the On-site Septic Evaluator has confirmed that it is .. possible to add on to the mound system to provide capacity for '■'* -r ^iv seven bedroons. There is also sddirional area available to provide an alternate site wit.h equal capacity.. C •-* ' Cohen questioned whether it is a require^tient to have two exits wnen dealing with an apartnient unit. •- Mabusth stated that the Builcing Code does address the issue of exits, but bedroom secondary egress. •■ ‘ "t': ‘'iX'i! is grade level and windows provide '•r*' There were no comments from the public and Kelley closed the Publiu Hearing at 7:30 p.m. Cohen asked for assurance that the chain reflect the fact that this is a non-cental unit. of title will Mabusth stated that the resolution granting the Conditional Use Permit would be filed in the chain of title. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Cohen, ..to^reeomand approval of the Conditional Use Permit for,/Ca ».-,'non-reati^ apartment, based on the findings that it is potsibla- to!expand the mound system to accommodate the number of bedrooaa-withini-tho i: * ' . ■/ * . ta.tnu.iv . ..vr.- -■'•u house, that the house is ^located .on .a.,large. parenlioCAland'^and apartment.^Motionthere is a demonstrated reed ..for ;the Nays-0. Motion passed. #1614 JACK KBOOE 1690 SHAOYWOOO Ri RENEWAL VARIANCE Mr. Rhode Wi HyV/.',:;. S»!|vW., ' Kelleyopened ,the!(Publie .Rearing .at 7 tS6 p.n: .TThere(..wnrn ne comments from-the public regarding this matter and'Kelley eloaed the Public Hearing at 7tS7 p.m. ,t"' '■‘-U \ . 4 IIt was moved by Cohen,‘ seconded by Moos, to recommend - approval of the renewal Variance to increase hardcover In the 75-250* setback area. Motion, Ayes-6, Nays-0, Motion carried, '-y . . • ' . * - V - •Vr ‘‘v; .’ - 13 - I >*•* • n » < • ;V A ' V < ,*■. •^ . V * * ' ^ I w ^ ^ '1^*WM I > • r L‘W ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 PUBLIC COMMENTS CONTINUED atmosphere. I have been told that Tad Jude, Gen Olson, Smith and other elecw .-d offici^als will be present. Steve ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT: #1614 JACK RHODE, 1690 SHADYWOOD ROAD RENEWAL VARIANCE RESOLOTIO^^ #2^21 by Goetten. seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution #2921, granting renewal of hardcover Variances approved in Resolution #2769. Motion, Ayes--!, Nays-0. Motion passed. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT: PARK COMMISSION APPLICATIONS • Bernhardson asked Council if - • wished to interview the Park Commissioners that are re-t-i^; .mg, Richard Flint, Susan Wilson, and Jim Gilbert. Mayor Peterson stated that there is no need to interview the persons currently serving, only the new applicants. ^ Jabbour asked if it may be appropriate for Council to have a copy of attendance records when considering the re-appointment of individuals. Council agreed that would be helpful. Mayor Peterson stated that would apply to the Planning Commission as well as the Park Commission. OTHER Callahan stated that it has come to his attention that surrounding communities are having new wetland inventories taken. He suggested that Orono do the same. Callahan stated that the City should re-examine the issue of landscaping plastic and how it is being used as a bargaining tool to gain structural hardcover. Goetten agreed and suggested that the issue should also be discussed with the Planning Commission. Jabbour suggested scheduling a work session Council and the Planning Commission so that Council could discuss their position on some of the City's major issues. Ha said, "We should try to explain to the Planning Commission what role we belxeve they should play. Triere may be some individuals that may not wish to take on that role." Mayor Paterson asked Charlie Kelley if he could suggest a - 14 - I - - d-TVi- OF aRQNcrr ^ City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.Q 1 ^ ^ ^ X A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 fi 2 FILE NO. 1614 WHEREAS, Jack Rhode (hereinafter “the applicant") '^e property located at 16 90 Shadywood Road within the City of (hereinafter "City ”) and legally described as follows. Lot 10 and that part of Lot 11 described as ^= f^^inning at t^ Northwest corner of said Lot 11; thence southerly “l^ i^e"nc:‘’s7uth* dX^e^T‘’aT^ln'uter East ^ then" W«f aVong" sa\d' ToHit: ),°ffte°'”ttt"t«pt?;y ”ttShadywood, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the property ), and WHEREAS, the Jj^22^°sVbd'^ivisio^ oe^^mi t ^the Municipal Zoning Code st‘r^uJture Ling the existing foundation, ;5. "S.'.,". .......... Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This renewal application was reviewed as Zoning File' #1614 property consists of 17,700 s.f. or .41 acres. 3. The Orono Planning Conunission reviewed this renewal application on January 22, 1991, and recommended approval of the requested variances based upon the following findings: A) Major upgrading of the property will result in the following changes to existing substandard conditions: Pace 1 of 5 . G«:vc..:j QF j ORON<y City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2921 Lakeshcre Required Existing Existing Proposed Proposed Variance: Existing Proposed Existing Proposed setback: - 75' Principal Structure = Accessory Structure = Principal Structure « Accessory Structure = 55 10 61' 59' (second level deck extends 2' beyond lakefront of principal residence) Principal Structure « 20' Principal Structure = 14' Accessory Structure = 65' Accessory Structure = 16' or 26% or 18.6% or 86% or 21% (second story upper level deck) 2) Hardcover within the 0-75' Setbac.k Area: Allowed = 0 s.f. Existing * 926 s.f. or 15.8% Proposed = 812 s.f. or 13.5% Total Reduction ® 2.5% B) The application involves no need for a hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback area as applicant proposes removal of major portions of existing hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. C) The use of the existing foundation will provide less of an impact on the lakeshore property. D) The original structure was placed on the property prior to current standards for lakeshore development. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Cc.de and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 City of ORONO «► - GH^- OF ORONa , X RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2921 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 to permit the construction of a new residence structure using the existing foundation subject to the following conditions: 1. All hardcover scheduled for removal must be completed prior to the final inspection by the Building staff for the new construction. Please refer to Exhibit A of this resolution for hardcover areas designated for removal. 2. Applicant to provide a Highway Department permit for the relocated curb cut to the site. 3. Applicant or applicant's architect shall provide the Building staff with the engineering data or findings that confirm the existing foundation can sustain the proposed 2-story structure at the time of application for a building permit. Applicant is hereby advised that, if for any reason unknown at this time, the existing foundation cannot be used, variance application #1614 shall be scheduled for further consideration before both the Planning Commission and the Council. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this resolution will expire on that date (January 28, 1992). 5, Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 5 I r 1 OTV- ■ OF I ORONaX City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2921 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 28thday of January, //Z'^7- llin. City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 28th dav of January, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson, & Dorothy M. Halim, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the 1 THERESA L NAAS NOTARV mSUO . MINNESOTA h ^nepin county My cmmMon •xpm* 9-^92 Notary Public Owner(s) Page 4 of 5 L t' \ ^ I City of OROrVO OF QHaNCT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2921 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of LiCL 199I before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally aopeared c» iC. k^l\rrt' n i <\\: - - - - - --—. known to me to be the person!s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (v,hey) executec the same as his (their) free act and deed. <_i ^<2<n L NnTAR Y PUBLIC THERESA L. NAAB notary PUBUO • MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY My BunMnniWN aupna hY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this dav of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) execu.,ed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Pace 5 of 5 i i ?iia T TSLrs \a*TJ^ —I* »%«r. •,*. . K-'. <No CM . V ♦. .* • •• • »•• • (•. 17 '„7i£il 'JJ-i—r • ^ '*■ r * “•• — ** w! ^ t»;.«.- ■ ^ >»,.,_ * /r* ■ . • ■ ^■^**^*’ V».« • ^*.**^*VT7**^ _____• -- ■.^.•*r ——------— .-. •—----------------- -- ^ "T, %:T^ - 1^. . ... . ““.7 ."aiT^-t .-«:-O 2 O M H P InJ O I/? U o: • .••••>.« ;.*r • .•... » .•* . >«»•• •• 4 • : £.-?cr_' £-:£;t*‘v:;-:---’ir77 -~.:7rVJ I i '"'I \v.w. •• "'yb/ \ \ 1 \u, ian *n 6 ^ £s iU .•:-^ • • • rx V • S *P\0 >•. - :2il \ « ' • I I m\yj D x \VL -\i ___ C Vw K 1. t, ^ s. •*, R<- ; V V ■ * t^\’ \ • * *j bdnr^ fl ''S l|\L\yjkLU 7^ ' \ i - • - . 5.-. ^ i„ .A .r^- '• •■■•■d ^ <•“ ^»c»;*.-ry livti ..-_ '■-.'^•''W M \1.tVU>jtc . CCt~ OP-' fctSMt -r® *.»(.>Ttr^o-^iJv^. t.ivTtM®. ■•' fe£%“tirMrxa tkjbiCi r^.'i LitVliMi j JQ rrn\iun Pk->«au-t:iiULlL I ajy f-^zz Pije» ri.su • H — \ I. ?■ iL..»^A I I c&iUSanc.'»\/«nraBi ■iHirik r G *--p i r tf J 3 2-/ fhI* ^ ^ I » M - ' > •. «M*. •-«■ 4 r,OM« -I 1« r //ic-luJt.-4 ; - ------- _____ ------------- • «t *• • €P* II h 1 -4^ ^ - •►.*• - uLd Tos Planning Commission Chairman Kellsy Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:February 15r 1989 Subject: #1381 Jack F. Rhode, 1690 Shadywood Road Variances ” Public Hearxng Pertinent Pacts/Ordinances - .Ur Total Area: Required » 21,780 s.f. Existing *= 17,700 s.f. or Lot Width: Required « 100' At Lakeshore = 02.9' or 82% At Building Line =80' or 80% acres Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 - Lakeshore Setback Variance. Required for new construction outside of defined building envelope (beyond existing foundation). existing Required = 75' Existing Principal Structure * 55' Existing Accessory * 10' Proposed Principal » 61' ^ j m proposed Accessory - 59' (Second level deck extends 2 beyond lake front of principal residence, steps at lowGi level extend 14") Variance: Principal Structure - 14' or 18.6% Accessory Structure » 16' or 21% proposed, r.!e City must address the need for the variance for the construction, consistent with previous reviews. iiiiM'ihrtlllillllliff .J r Zoning File #1381 February 15, 1989 Page 2 of 4 Area within 0-75' » 6,100 s.f. Allowed = 0 s.f. Existing = 926 s.f. or 15.8% Proposed = 812 s.f. or 13.3%* (review Exhibits E, F, I & L) New Construction Within 0-75' = 177 s.f. of new principal structure 35 s.f. of upper balcony (note hardcover of grade level stairs not included because of second story balcony hardcover) Review of hardcover within 75-250', note there is no need for variance approval. Area ** 11,600 s.f. Allowed - 2,900 s.f. or 25% Existing 2,290 s.f. or 19.7% Proposed “ 2,883 s.f. or 24.85% Increase of hardcover = 593 s.f. or 5.1% List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - Exhibit K - Exhibit L - Exhibit M - Exhibit N - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Applicant's Addendum Existing Hardcover Inventory Proposed Hardcover Inventory Elevations Floor Plans Staff's Sketch Designating New Construction Within 0-75' Setback Area Palm Variance Application - Staff Sketch Palm Survey Site Plan Proposed Hardcover 6 Removals Average Lakeshore Setback Line Existing Survey 1 Zoning File #1381 February 15, 1989 Page 4 of 4 A. Denial. If denied, please refer to Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A) for the necessary findings for denial. B. Table. The Planning Commission may determine that the applicant has not explored all options for the expansion/improvement of the property. C. Approval. Based on the factual findings noted by applicant and staff and conclusions from discussions of issues based on the following conditions: 1) All hardcover scheduled for removal must be completed prior to the final inspection by the Building Staff for the new construction. 2) Applicant to provide a Highway Department Permit for the relocated curb cut to the site. 3) Applicant or applicant's architect should- provide the Building Staff with the engineering data or findings that confirm the existing foundation can sustain a 2-story structure (2-story structure is already supported by existing foundation). I r Zoning File #1381 Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendation - March 3, 1989 The Planning Commission unanimously approved Mr. Rhode's variance application that would allow the total reconstruction of a residence using the existing foundation. The new residence structure would be located 61' (second level deck extends 2* beyond lake front of principal residence at 59') resulting in an improved lakeshore setback from the existing at 55'. The Planning Commission's approval was based on the following hardships and findings: 1. Use of existing foundation will result in less of an impact on the lakeshore property. 2, The house was constructed prior to lakeshore setback regulations and standards. 3. The improvement will result in reductions in hardcover in the 0- 75' setback zone and improved lakeshore setbacks. 4. The proposed improvement of the property will not require an additional variances but will result in the reductions of the intensity of existing variances on the property. Approval was subject to the following conditions: 1. All hardcover scheduled for removal must be completed prior to the final inspection by the Building staff for new construction. 2. Applicant to provide a Highway Department permit for the relocated curb cut to the site. 3. Applicant or applicant's architect shall provide the Building staff with the engineering data or findings that confirm that the existing foundation can sustain a 2-story structure. If at any time it is revealed that the existing foundation cannot sustain the proposed residential structure, applicant will be required to return to the Planning Commission and Council for further consideration. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission's unanimous recommendation. i The applicant proposes complete reconstruction of residence structure on the site using only the existing foundation located approximately 61' from the lakeshore setback area. In order to meet the hardcover allowance of 25% within the 75-250' setback area, the applicant proposes the removal of the existing detached garage and a re-location of a trimmed back access drive with backout strip. Approximately 212 s.f. of new structure is proposed within the 0-75' setback area. Applicant proposes the removal of 326 s.f. in order to offset the excess of hardcover at 15.18% existing. The applicant proposes a total reduction of 114 s.f. of hardcover within the 0-75' setback area. The reconstructed residence will now be totally located behind the 61' setback area with a 2' upper story deck extending another 2' into the lakeshore protected area at 59'. The previous principal structure was set at 55' with an accessory staircase located 10' from the lakeshore. Issues for Consideration - 1.Is the proposal consistent with similar improvement variance applications (review Exhibit J & K)? In consideration of the Palm application at similar lot area and width standards, the Rhode application has less hardcover than approved in the Palm application. Palms: 0-75' = 17.5% Rhode : 0-75' = 13.3% 75-250'29% 75-250'24.8% 2. 3. Are there specific features or functions of the improvement plan that could be improved upon or amended? Have the improvements in structural setbacks from the lake and hardcover reductions offset the 212 s.f. of new structural hardcover within the 0-75' setback area? Based on the conclusions drawn from the discussions above and the factual findings presented by applicant and staff in the review, following options of action are available to the Planning Commission: c>€//^77a>Jo£_ r/J3 t» « r") iJL^j " '“^ O J*. • D-, O-VS / ----------J'^ ■■ . yj ... / y.. ___??y^.£31- ,j£?Sr=!£t^ z' .rr^-=r^^2^. CiAO..yZA:^. ______________________________ ^yA~y/7J^ ~~y7iy€<L- ^=:s:iy^L-y^yk^^^^ ya^ ^Xj€iiyC7 .^yl.yy £^?rr!=?l^ £-t^ ^y^^'^TrT/yl. dLMr I t'j i:5- fO~ -XT ^ y . ~:p^ ^ d^y^ ^ u —___________ .'A rv l^'-| III nfii ' • HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' (^-25^ 250-300' 5GQ-1CC0' Existing Hardcover in Zone • • A. House o X o a S.F. 7^f length WIDTH X _9. A =AS S.F. S'. 2 X . _ S-.7S ^CJArP^S7Z:CJ^7.;:X a '(s/.AO s.F.'^*'^ X a S.F. B.Garage X ^0.3 ^^S7. TA S.F. C.Driveway ^7.r . X 9C’7,S ‘0 S.F. X _ _ S f F • D.Sidewalk Cj . X /A. o ”7^ S.F. X /9S- s.p. X S.F. E.^atio/3eck X S.F. F.Landscape X . S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY X S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X • • . S.F. /.5 X So,o S9 S.F. '€-9 G. Other X =S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone S.F. Total Property Area in Zone S.F.B B // X 100 /<5’. 7 % A { ii HARDCOVER CALCUUTIOH WORKSHgT/ NE; (circle ohe) 'iSSO-SOfi^ ■■SGO^CCCb' , —^ / / JL. SETBACK ZONE E:<is7Ing Hardcover in Zone A. House F//t^uacs^ St/id ✓ sy?c//es . COA/Cjf£y^ Cu^CL B. Garage c. D riveway D,. Sidewalk e. Patio/ D eck F. Landscape AREAS UNDERUIN BY RUSTIC SHEETING 6. Other LENGTH ^.7 /. 3 -7V /.3 X X X X WIDTH ^A7 7.3 SIS' ^3.0 ' 6^cro Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone .F. /C-2. /O^y^-C,______ S.F. ^Co. ^S S.F. 'S3, o> C> s • F. ^ Ss /S'-// S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ^/OCi S.F.u T1 4 fTI Cl/'PC X 100 - % 4/ r HKft.nCftVttl. <^AUULFNTlOMt. ‘Zone*.O' WFT.(O . W V\i.h SE.t> // W KAPKOV C. FoTURt. (L.J^ I. p\ HOObt M.z X - 'liO P3^ HOubE Z. 0 V S'.©16 n -iTtP l.*! P4 ‘blE't’ ^5 a R. (V OrTL 6» O l.VN^ IftKlO icAPE. UNAiit'^l.AlKJ e>V PLA6UC.bWEtriNo T 11,8 =i 12> 11' c = 13 KJ 0 w KaC N \L K1 0 S)t- T OTAl_ ToTKL r UxatiC^MtLpL \U '^jOKIe! ft IO. 6a Ft A v Rat»E.ft.Tiy A^EA U s) '2A)JE 6>1 C)0 ^Tt ft H aixi^a T t 4 (d\0C =:- |'5.3 ^ Pfe(19ER.Ty' IkCeA. tU-zAt8C- TKKEN >=R.IiM 'jUR'IUV BV tWIH <iRtNt.ER/i ! ii-ii- Eb 1 I'UROGav/E^ CP^LCULRTlOklb ^£rBACi<^ "l-O ^4 tL O FT* PR.0?Otb£.?^ Uk-\^'DCL(k\/E\?—A ' X ' * i i \ :i Woobe pr Ib.^' >< Sb'to - <1Sl.O ; ttoobe VL T.o )c -7.0 ^ ^<1.0 A PI i1 i — ti^RAGffe.PI 'xAn y 1.5.0 .=1 3*0 ^ ^5 -0 “ *75.0 i DR\'lE.\l4fty n \^.0 :»< ^C> 0 :=. g70.0 'j w ) PIO 1.|| 10.() - ------------------------- 5 P'A 0.0 ^ 11, c 5lL —------- i UM406C.API. U mDE-iX c A iKJ It ,CA 1 iiOWE' 1 , ................. ■ ,. _____— , .., .,. --------------------------------------------------------------- t « 1 { XOIAL HAt'.DCOV/tTV \Kl ^On IEL 2853 A ^ ^ ""***—*" - --- ■ ' ' 1 ^ T0T(kL hRtft U4 Z,0)>J<c WLdOO^mI'^ 6 1 A.1063 ^Tt-r \\ leOO 6tVT ^ l^‘8S‘’/e ] —H _________________________— 1 • 1i i > * { ‘ ^ ( ! • i 5> • ■ 11 < ?RaPtiLTy kfeEA \M iOVJt Tk\^tu FROlt dOFFlM AROKlBtlR^rt' ” ll v'b\ -^U . V ••*•..1/ ••' *\ • mmm •w*.' ;•■ •..• -•"••,■ • .,.;..;-;V: O- •., ' . - '- 'V ■;•;■. ';.• •••••; *> ■ ' :'. : . '. <:. '■ >■.' 'v''• ■ ? ''vv^^’. fosH?* • '-.v -- M§MMM ' .• / .. •■‘.r ■•..•;• .1 •: . •• ‘ •* m f V JWiiLr i ••• •if *• >••■• .'••;. • urTOTin .>>'54 iff I 'i-;V}si :■ ^ ff-ff: :-: . ff- v.----^ ff’ff •. ■•• ■•■... -• r-':-'Wfy - ■ . •: .•?■ ■•' 5 -■. ^ ■ • Vi .: , •. :.vw ■i-MVi iiil - •r....rjv r-!S:?r-:V• . -H. -Sf :.• Av • ■ ‘ x =;.v- :^:x- - • . Kx ;. ■••■» '• tV ’ i fS=:i. t*V ..VV.|V-V...':ff, ‘. l;> .v:. •• . > • • • iiaWX.,:r«:« ^-Vvv ' :■ ■ ■■;■■ •:^‘ -ff ' ■ -V-'":'-'-■ ■ :'i4»'*’-u'.•■■■■.. • •■^■’v'' ' ** ■ ■■'' -yL ir ft: 1 y y\ ':'.:V;"- -f*. ' .. .. / » i » * • « I * Vff •' ✓' v v; -' yy' y m y y y .* ';My y? , - '; ■ • ;•; >, ■ . it*P- %#Ky: v;#w I : t . • H • • ^ ^ 4; t il1 • ..JjTTiT^Txft'iVVi:, "•rii's;:-•• I * v» i - rtV: 'S ^ v! • •• ■•. . •; -'.v . L.. •' -i '■• •♦•! 1 ^ *."'T' J •jC^. >:r..ff.r'VM *!:••> bmlIa -V: ..'ff- • :■ .V £1 (i> 1 ;t» Sn\ rn <■ r r*rr*r 'H'li lib V «iHii I iH'Mjtr' rrrr;hi';H 4 f \ B I i‘:ih\W? Ti *l: rT '^1«I . lli.' 1m I ; fc 1"^Ih id» w*; CD A Ui / w * « * «■- . ^ . t • . -4 iff^-=-------1 ?•-!**•.•'*1 -f—.-4J r^is. =jr r - ! r- b • '2^'A ' ir. JT'T ! _ i 1•1r• r V. h ----------- ■ m ■^.• _^-_T- L L. t Y f^.i: \ 0 '0 NJ os.S^ / -S J D-«- •% • .Awi^ur-nT-y... •>».'iM^»-i»«t»v»> nriiiiii,ir»“'»«‘»'>»-'^««>»»»«a"»-****^«^"«*'v ilfcirhiii II J - • . CAKixaXif fr-*r ^^ A-k. M A - f1 1' 1 I n r’n. ;;*V". i'- •' *T £xyvT)vlAr•»«. .5 .. •»5- / >oin>m(^«s ..... 7 '’^ \vih ‘lX»^^^^.T0•V4D^‘l^o\J RtU*Dfc* ,, iyi»riM(i f0yi)D(Kl)QUVlKLL> „ Id'- ^\.»J w T i i5^ -. i. /.. •• Cv.* I F~/oof^ * • * •*» . « .'} VI •»• ^ j {! V. (b>I V ! V .fr '"t I I * *1 : 5.^ ‘ \ •>* < ‘ •.t 4 I, •» * • I/ I .*■ - r'' 4 > * ••.» - * 9 * f• » f? I ^ >•» •.I 1 ( ». , f •f ".•» ' r •' . t'y,‘i ■ - '? * i:vr'i- Tt 'r t. •1 s *;•. •> ^ • ^ 4 .y^ i 4:*•• 5: 1 * X • ■ *rC i\ 1 rV * ., X .^;] •/• • ' \ ^ ,f- 4 .’• ••<>. I-* * ••- :>A • ' ■'-♦\ >* ' *• * *». »»•ij • a s ^ ; 5 =^ "i ^ HIHDTES op THB PLAHNIIIG COMMISSION MEETING FEBROART 21, 1989 ZONING PILE »1378-0STR0M COOTIN^ closeness of theWith respeot to Kelley s oono^^^^ neighboring residence, Mr. the addition from view. Mr. dense vegetation the addition in another Ogurbil an existing porch or with Jh%°^a\°u”ra7 4innes^^^^^^ farm-character” architecture which was a main reason he purchased the house. The Planning Commission, ^ ^ jf views that the Planning Commissioner Brown There were no comments from the public ^garSing this matter and the public hearing was closed (Planning Commissioner Bellows departed at this time). It was moved by Chairman ^®.^^®J'jQ®®^^g^sfdeyard ^setback Commissioner Cohen, to Nays=0, Motion passed,for #1378, Curtis Ostrom. Motion, Ayes 5, y #1379 WAYZATA COONTRY CLUB 200 WAYZATA BLVD. CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT ^ ”10 o m '■““ThfJf™daviror?ubIicI?iora;d Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. The applicant was present for this matter, It was -ved by Planning C-amissioner ^Cohen^ “jucaJion"" Mo%\°or Aye” 5. Nays=0 .Motion passed. ,#1381 JACK RHODE 1690 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCES a AK n u !™“5hfJ?f?davifof-pubUcluo^a;d Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. The applicant was present for this matter. zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that this_^a_ppli^cati|n involved a setback for "®" i^cVfor new'construction. Evenarea, as well as a hardcover variance £or^ though there is a teductio reguired. The proposed variance approval for ”|Se second story.Structure Will be 61 from tne/a^ lakeshore. The 2-foot wide, deck, will oe ay n-75* area will be 3%.overall reduction of hardcover in the 0 75 area wii struoturVTu id%“ ^m^ved^^atu^^rre/1 i\” tha^y^ if wou OF THB FLAHNIHG COHMISSIOH MEETING FEBROART 21, 1989 T-CTXNG FILE n381-MODE She recommended that be, with the iiwed with similar considerations as the this North Arm Drive, in that approval be ^:^dftTon?d'’ipon\he existing foundation being used. t*hp Planning Cominission was that: The general ® ° oged house not extending as close they were in favor house. They were also in to the lakeshore as the the 0-75' setback area from of the reduction in hardco the average 15.8% to 13.3%. f®. Ind will have an attached garage. Thelakeshore setback line, and wiix n detached garage will be removed. It was moved by =°7^//^o°'^®end'’^rpprovri° Planning Commissioner ° ® ^ setback variance required for applioation 9ranting the lakeshore setback shall new construction on the existing upper story deck Sr allowed at 59' the'^ main part of the extending into the 1®''®®*}°'^®Edition, aoproval is reoommended for house shall be at “ ' “ or 8 i2 s.f., within the 0-75- 'e\%a^%^ «eirwIt\“no"rddlli-;i Motion, A^esis, Nays=0, Motion passed. #1382 JOHN ROGERS 755 TONKAWA ROAD ^^^“davirof-F^bUoition-aAd Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. oresent for this matter, however.The applicants were n ^ P „as present on their Mr. Mark Lumry of Artexa uoiiH behalf.j* • Assistant Planning .^"^^“"^"^here^had Veen°a revision informed the Commission t^ hardcover in the to this proposal. There wii ^ existing storage shed. Mr. 0-75* zone due f^^,^®w°Z%here would not be any additional Lumrv also explained that tnere wu terrJee area as originally proposed.CB --------- - • 1 Chairman :^iLg%"“lakeIh%%“°s"etbac\“v\=riance. Gaffron agreed. f ^ . ge w -------- Planning Commissioner Brown explained" that %he the average lakeshore set '—‘.telv 200' away would not be house to the fo^^h, approximate lyJ^O^O affected, to the north, ^xiating guest house and main Lumry mentioned the fact ®^® addition. There is an existing Sncfr^'alnfJg wairiJilh wSuld minimize the visual impact the addition from the lake. f. Ltv m minutes op regular orono council meeting march 13, 1989 / N .#1381 JACK RHODE / 1690 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCES RESOLUTION #2593 r. Rhode was present for this matter. citv Administrator Gerhardson explained that Mr. -\°b\c.^'zon‘^e?Vote\"e^ Approval is required because of the new construction. There were no questions or comments on behalf of Mr. Rhode or the Council. It was moved by CounciImember Goetten, seconded by CounciJmember Peterson; to adopt f lakeshore setback and hardcover variances. Motion, flyes Nays=0, Motion passed. #1382 JOHN ROGERS 755 TONKAWA ROAD ^®®^?®Rogers was present, as was his Landscape Architect, Mark Lumry. was exBlained by Acting City Administrator Gerhardson, ^S:m!fsfoi?\^°th%\r"F^b\\%rr21, meeting, approved this application on a 3 to 2 vote variourdr'kTn^ge'plan^^'uggeJt^^^^ a steep slope. Other options would be to end ^ _ ^Sut*e\r pTpenc^o^s^^fhrprorert^ s°o TtM" l%ischarge behind the 75* line. Mr. Lumry explained that ‘he current drainage patte^^ brings water down across The runoff is currently being Stairway in the 0 75 he if the pipe brought it todischarged in the same are calculated that there would ?ubic feef o/ wat«'pe\""second running through the pipe in the event of the 100-year storm. counci imember Goetten questioned the hardship involved with n—rtilf i. y • ;»» f 7?A.(r ■ /uy / f / ;/ il • * f ^ r r lo™#0. 'I '•ii!i“[ 'ifi£ s Jf:,Ifkii 'J' • •■ '! h't.. ^m: . .i. ' r • » i;v? I ■i, »I •■. |‘j’- IV: Ili !i; , t I I !'*.!• •> • V 1:. U ■5 i^'"’ I'i ^ \ \ i 1 i‘-' /yyyy y j '■ y/y y ’if V :fir H-/ iy -,i 'k I’.!in:m-'i ;.'.r ■• __________________ I ] » N <• 1 ’. \* f J - i ; - I ,-i - 'I’ r r”' ^L=> To: From: Date: Subject: Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator January 10, 1992 #17uo & #1709 Judson Dayton, 825 Old Crystal Bay Rd South Variance/Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearings Zoning District: LR-IA Total Area = 23+ acres Pertinent Ordinances 1.Section 10.03, Subd. 9 (C) Arco restrictions for accessory structures. Applicant proposes a 32' x 23' addition to an oversized accessory structure that already exceeds the allowed area for the residential property. Allowed = 3,000 s.f. Existing = 4,432 s.f. Proposed = 5,168 s.f. Variance *= 2,168 s.f.or 72% 2. Section 10.23, Subd. 4 (A) - Guest houses/guest apartment. Applicant has applied for a conditional use permit in order to renovate/restore a former caretaker apartment within oversized accessory structure. Many of the standards for a guest apartment are not applicable in this case as apartment is not located within principal structure. Guest house standards may be applicable for this review. List of Exhibits - A - Application #1708 B - Application #1709 C - Property Owners List D - Plat Map E - Certificate of Survey P - Existing Floor Plan G - First Floor Plan H-1-2 - Elevations 1-1-2 - Septic Maps J -1-3 - Elevatiuns/Guest Apartment K-1-2 - Second Floor Plan/Guest Apartment f. Zoning Application #1708 & #1709 January 10, 1992 Page 2 Application #1708 - Description of Request Applicant proposes a 23' x 32’ addition to the east side of the existing oversized accessory structure to be used for the storage of farm equipment. As the applijant's addendum notes, the property is to be farmed and horses are to be stabled for the first time since 1918. It will be necessary to provide additional area for the storage of farm equipment that applicant now stores off-site. The structure meets the required 30' setback from all lot lines. As property is a lakeshore lot, the street yard is now the rear yard and an accessory structure can be placed in front of the principal structure. The accessory structure does not exceed the allowed 30' in height shown at highest point at 23'. The total property consists of ov 23 acres. The current accessory structure code allows a maximum 3,000 s.f. in area with 9 acres or more. The code does not take into consideration properties that contain in excess of 9 acres. There are no other accessory structures on the property. The proposed structure at 5,168 s.f. in area would meet the total area allowed for all accessory structures on the property at 6,000 s.f. This variance application is similar to the variance application sought by Irwin Jacobs for his lakeshore property. Please note hardcover has not been addressed as there is clearly no hardcover problem. If approved, based on directives of Section 10.03, Subd. 9 (C), the applicant will be asked to execute a covenant to be filed in the Chain of Title dealing with the controls on this structure if the property is to be subdivided at a future date. Review Exhibit L. Hardship Statement Please review Exhibit A. The application lists the following hardships: 1. The existing oversized structure at 4,432 s.f. has existed on the property for over 50 years. 2. 3. The property consists of 23+ acres. The existing oversized structure meets all other required standards for an oversized accessory structure. 4.The proposed addition will not require any setback variances. i i r Zoning Application #1708 & #1709 January 10, 1992 Page 3 Application #1709 - Description of Request Applicant proposes the restoration of a former caretaker apartment. There is no record that the former caretaker apartment was ever approved via a required conditional use permit. The former caretaker apartment has not been in use for several years. It is the desire of the applicant to reinstall a non-rental guest apartment as part of the upgrading of the oversized accessory structure. No expansions to the oversized accessory structure are proposed as a result of the restoration of the guest apartment. Access to the apartment is via a grade level door to the south side of the structure. Entrance is through a maintenance garage area. Review the conditional use permit section of the code that deals with guest apartments and guest houses. Many of the standards for guest apartments are not applicable as apartment is not located in a principal residence. Staff would suggest that guest house standards are more appropriate for this review, although it is obvious that this structure will never function as a primary residence if subdivided in the future. There is adequate area to satisfy 3 residential units (principal residence, caretaker residence and apartment within the oversized accessory structure) for the 2 acre zone. Per code each unit requires 2 acres in area. Review Exhibit E, there is an 85' separation between the caretaker residence and the oversized accessory structure. The setback would meet the total side setback at 60' for the LR-IA zoning district (30' side yard for LR-IA zone). Review Exhibits K-1-2. Note not only the guest apartment will contain plumbing, but the lower level will continue to have plumbing. The City has no record of an on-site septic system that serves this structure. Review Exhibits 1-1-2, the map of the septic system that serves the caretaker residence. The mound system was installed within the last few years. As the septic map shows, this system is located to the immediate north of the caretaker house. This system was designed exclusively for the caretaker residence. There is no evidence that the system serves gray water or septic discharge from oversized accessory structure. Applicant will be asked to provide information as to an existing system that may serve the oversized accessory structure or provide septic testing and a design for an on ­ site septic system to serve septic needs of the oversized accessory structure with guest apartment. The proposed conditional use permit application requires no variances to the pertinent standards set forth in the current code. The above referenced covenant should be amended to include reference to the guest apartment and a potential impact of a future subdivision on a conditional use permit (i.e. special area needs for residential use in addition to additional acreage for oversized accessory structure). L Zoning Application #1708 & #1709 January 10, 1992 Page 4 Unique Findings Please review application. Exhibit B. Applicant notes the following findings: 1. Existing guest quarters were installed when structure was built in 1906. 2. Applicant proposes no additional expansion of oversized accessory structure with rennovation of apartment. Options of Action If denied, please refer to the necessary findings within the conditional use permit section of your code. 1. approved, the following conditions may be considered: Guest apartment within oversized accessory structure is for the non-rental use of the owner/occupant of principal residence on subject property. 2.If property is subdivided in the future, this conditional use permit will expire and a current owner of new lot must apply for a new conditional use permit for guest house/guest apartment use. 3. Execution of a covenant for oversized accessory structure to insure area needs if property is subdivided in the future. Applicant is advised that a review of the existing septic facility serving this structure is required as a part of the building permit review for upgrade and restoration of the oversized accessory structure. If conditional use permit for guest apartment is approved, septic upgrade must include septic needs for guest apartment. Isv ( iiiuk J CITY OF ORONC — VARIANCE APPLICATION 4 //Initial Application Fee $175.00 ^ ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) t . # »■, ■] \ PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ^L. required survey. APPLICANT Name Phone (home) /O- r)A'-/y~SA)Phone (work) 33V~3/V<^ Address : fu^A^yc City; OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City; ClTi OF ORO^O Zip; OFFICE i vv V w Date Property Acquired (month/year P" ^ 7tr MI wf . VV I (do) (2Slno^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present: Zoning District Present Use of Property (^sidentia^ Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Other ffA 'HOMa/iUX HARDSHIP • t Cl^L JbDescribe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from stric enforcement of zoning regulations; , t t , A >% it' ^ . r\ . ^ ^ ^ snrorcemenT: oz ^- -/- - -AswtAgAt-' Vi&ZS,"2^ , Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with .-oning cmaAAu 2. 3- 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS certif^d Property^Owners” List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). . , j certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8% xll_for reproduction) • . * . ^ ^ Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 81. xll ). S)tetches or plans of floor s elevation views (provide 1 copy 8i« xll ). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. ^nfoTnia^-inn has not been included. “e“a'^Icant®^^by agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay adcitional fees (staff nre not cLered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies t.hat the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Icnowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The^ner hereby aOtowledges and agrees to this application and father txon and verification of wHis request Owner's Signature _ _ _ _ _ _Date unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building Office of this change prior to the meeting. I ft ^ ’ ' ------ ------ ■ ■ ■ - ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ u I ■ ■ II I . * ‘ I jr -^1 • '. •' . . # i ' / U ?'v ^ •CITY CP CRCNC - GENERAL LAITO USE ________ PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address O/cfi Cry^u/IC Zfi'i ^v^-5'3’9/ Property Identification Nmnber (P.I.D.) 0^{[ /^OQ ^------ Please attach legal description to application if not incjuded on required survey. ^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ ~r”!I Phone (home) _ _ __—APPLICANT - Name -ntjvv,/.; />?. TY^'/nO- - - - - -Phone (work)., -- - Address //yr<- _ _ _ _ _ _ OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)- - - - --- - - - --- - Name '_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ - Address _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ Date Property Acquired - - --- - - --- I (do) tip noO) also own tne^ad^acent _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FEES “ CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS ~ Renewal Fee - l/^- Current Fee After-the-Fact Vee - Double Current Application Fe $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application I iJwfVil.VVVVV _ _ _ _ $125.00 Residential accessory Use aKi'pf J25!m $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments Sed&ffi 10^^ MB 12/21/': _ _ _ $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Conunercial/Industrial Use _ _ _ $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain — Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more ,;,keshore “■ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 of lakesh mam PPD/PID - see fee schedule OCBBR APPLICATIONS^ Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation _ , - - - - $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision “ $250.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedu ■ $100.00 Appeals _ _ _ _ Other - see fee schedule ■mill iiiiiiiii l,,.-.. .t-.w-iaiiierllriiuw ii \ ■ . -* .«• PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY . ^ Present Zoning Disrrict ffj Present Use of Property (Residential ^ ^ V* ^ ^ • f T DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST j{Af^ /C^AuftUAJL. fiuiljl/90C. 'YL> I m jiflT* detail:rjAlXt QiA^Atpu) 2, REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1, Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Deoartment that Land Use Application is complete Initials of Clerical Staff: ‘ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred ijj review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature CjuAhg/\ 'Tfl.Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this inquest. Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. * ----------4.4^a/Jr* „ r *« f RON DATE IZ/ZO/n BATCH 001 HEftEEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY C»tlERS LIST PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAfC/ADDR PROP ADOR OmER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER < NAME/ADDR I 38 04-117-23 33 0008 03059 FARVIEH LA E F BAKER I K J HYDE BAKER E F BAKER I K J HYDE BAKER 3059 FARVIEN LA LONG LAKE m 55356 38 04-117-23 34 0003 02811 FARVIEN LA E J TOTH 1 G V TOTH EONARD J A GERDA V TOTH 2811 FARVIEH LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 34 0010 02927 FARVIEH LA ROD SACHSE AMP SACHSE RICHARD A MARYLYNNE SACHSE 2927 FARVIEH LANE LONG LAKE m 55356 38 04-117-23 43 0012 02725 RAINEY RO H F KAHLER A E KAHLER H F KAHLER A E KAHLER 2725 RAINEY RO HAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 12 0002 00840 OLD CRYSTAL BAY A J ELLIS A J ELLIS 840 CRYSTAL BAY RC HAYZATA m 55391 RD S 38 09-117-23 21 0004 00038 ADDRESS UI4ASSI0NE0 LEONARD Q CARPENTER LEONARD 0 CARPENTER 15500 HAYZATA BLVO APT 1020 HAYZATA rti 55391 ‘ r - - ■ r' # 38 04-117-23 33 0009 03051 FARVIEH LA G D HILLIAMS I F B C HILLIAHS RONALD J BURGER 3051 FARVIEH LANE L0r4G LAKE m 55356 38 04-117-23 34 0008 02943 FARVIEH LA M N NICOLl A H K NICOLL MATTHEH N NICOLL 2943 FARVIEH LA LONG LAKE 55356 38 04-117-23 43 0007 00790 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD ARTHUR M BLAIR ETAL ARTHUR BLAIR 790 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23 43 0014 02770 RAINEY RD RICHARD K HYSOCKI ETAL RICHARD A APRIL HYSOCKI 2770 RAINEY RO HAYZATA MN 55391 58 09-117-23 12 0005 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO L 0 CARPENTER ETAL LEONARD 6 CARPENTER 15500 HAYZATA SlVb APT 1020 HAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 21 0005 00825 OLD CRYSTAL BAY PD S J M A E J DAYTON JUOSON M DAYTON TCF TONER SUITE 1860 MPLS m 55402 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 1 38 04-117-23 34 0002 02879 FARVIEH LA H A J HABERER NYHAN D A JANICE M HABERER 2879 FARVIEH LANE LONG LAKE MM 55356 38 04-117-23 34 0009 02935 FARVIEH LA SHIRLEY J BILLIGMEIER SHIRLEY BILLIGMEIER 2935 FARVIEH LANE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 43 0008 00820 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S GAB HUSr GEORGE A HOST 820 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD HAYZATA MN 55391 L- -a '■■J 38 09-117-23 12 0001 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED GAB IIUST GEORGE A HOST 820 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD HAYZATA MN 55391 ■ ■ ■ vX) 38 09-117-23 21 0001 00825 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD J M A E J DAYTON JUDSON M DAYTOr^ TCF TONER SUITE 1860 MPLS MN «?5402 38 09-117-23 21 0006 00905 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD i L G CARPENTER ET AL LEONARD G CARPENTER 15500 HAYZATA BLVO APT 1020 HAYZATA MN 55391 /*■ r i .t .1 -1 •V > RUN DATE It/tO/n BATCH 001 M. * ■ - HE»MEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OIMERS LIST REPORT NO. P14SB401 PAGE 2 ) « •f.V.i • * K . *• . ; . n v:;I- * -'V'i -I !• 1 N PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH ^ • / 001 00018 NAME/ADDR V I *v' i a » ^ ' ? ’fi • I 4 ' *' ''' w »i , ' “ • ............^ ' , 5 - »■ ' ./w r t' > > I » i V - . l> 4 * ♦ J * 7 • ' '"i . ‘I* ■ 1-' i ■. ‘f ’ • t ’‘'5. ; 'ji-'? ' ft ■•. 'X' . . ..I 1 T * » • %• . S ••Vtv. •• • ? vl*‘‘ - • f’ *•• . I ■»« f • i t' ^ * t :i 5 U ■ t '• » . I '.f. V i J * j - * * f . r,» • », h'>-t 9*0 tf . .• V. » •*. 1^: T I i .. • * ft t i * :•■ / 5 I ft' \ i.r ■' ft* J 4 • 1. .!i . r’ '^^7:.' I .* 1 • w X ■■ • I • • •i P‘ . » ,* • i . •. ; . .f A;, ' vrSfti. > .1 i» J V j::• i7*V* 7-- ■■ •' ■'' : ' ' ^ Man1 . . .»*I I «• }-V ; V ' :r •J. . •? •; ■ 1 i Vi. 1 ,,) »- I ; ?•< y... * . I :•• *IV?^ i ;Uv1 at:■■ ■( •■•, ■ : 1 . ' • v-- ■ • .• 7- ’ > ? * .'.-v• •«. -.*. -V •'•, J !i. i •’* 'i t- i . I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATlONi TO THE REST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF { ’ 1 *ft •** * w . {•■•■'. •.• ■ ;,• f » i/■ ;■ it• I 'r • t‘ - ‘< ; •[ j; • X; .■! ’' M\-■‘.••'iMv ■? t' V V ■4'i'* 1CORDS / I. i j DATE I ^ . < ■ftS; („’*.i■ ' I 'iiiJff M'. • • j S • 2 :? i' • , ; Y *• ■’• } •'. ;• •. •» t / : X'f i:|-1 f7 #'.jrt. i<ii>illMiiiil III II -ft I iriti Vi- CITY OF ORONO COVENANT FOR OVERSIZED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE THIS COVENANT, made and entered into this 19 , by day of HITHBSSBTH WHEREAS, Applicants have made application to the City for an accessory structure on property in Hennepin County, a e of Minnesota, legally described as: (hereinafter referred to as "Subject Property"); and L WHEREAS> City staff have reviewed Applicants application and have found that the structure requestec is MSniSi%^al"'-c\de%l"aS'o^"er^\-z^ A^cessor/structure (°OAS”h and if WHEREAS, Applicants are a^are that according to Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C)(3)(c), specific conditions exist for an allowable OAS; and WHEREAS, Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C)(3)(c) allows issu:ace of a permit for construction of the conditioned upon the execution of this Covenant and its filing i Applicant's chain of title; andss mmfssmms covenant. Page 1 of 4 5?' $L- 4 • TBE NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES TO THIS COVENANT AGREE TO FOLLOWING: « ■ t >' . !' -F 1. Applicants' request for one (1) Oversized Accessory londitionld ^uporihe°”exec^tiof orthi^^^ ^^he"" City and the Applicants.- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- ■- - - - - 2. The following conditions shall control the existence of the OAS; A) No future subdivision of the Subject Property will be approved that places the OAS within a lot that has no principal structure. B) Should Applicants wish to subdivide the Subject Property, the OAS may remain without a principal structure for a period to be determined by the Orono City Council. If no principal structure is fully constructed and completed on the property by the end of the determined period, the OAS must be removed. C) Should Applicants subdivide the Subject Property, the OAS and the principal structure shall be located within the same lot, ■’^hich meets the minimum lot area requirement based upon the size of the accessory building, which lot area requirement is detailed in Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C)(2) of the Orono Municipal Code. Setbac)c requirements as defined in Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C)(a) shall also apply. 3. This Covenant shall be binding upon current and future owners of Subject Property, and shall be filed within the chain of title of the Subject Property. 4. Fee owner(s) of the Subject Property, if not the Applicants, consent to the execution of this Covenant and to its terms, as shown by his/her/their signature(s) upon this document. Page 2 of 4 •% L 1 iiiiiiiJIiMiiy >111 Mtiii fr. 't/ytTWfl n"^ ^ ^yr«e«K>-.-*--^ ^—-— ^ -~'<v ^ ‘J . IV •: V liiwJlL pEM<OVfe pxiot Io ^✓INPC^^W------------ • * uee> g-xKJTihCi 65L/><D0 f'NL PTxC^HO <*• Hpwi» in H&.yN' PP/»-r-ibc. P-&MCWE; exic^rte- WlNCkPW- f*rt?Vlpfc N6»W. yViNOPv/ ---- } .•■ £c;cvNC> pL(r?(:?p-rL/-vN — A..:rh^^4-: V 1 i »;•■ . purvvpv& ■ FUs<s>r -n * TC> r/^TCH PKV v ^P& t-. f=ir.H* NbW vei^iP'Y I PlXTUpCr- 'TBv f-t V'/ll FHsI pJE-. ce. Ex'ieriNiSi » T<r> PA toH/ PlLi 4 r J* • i *•; r.C ' •.•?■**•';<» f ? . / ■ • M ■«»***' ~ lltMlI ■ 11 lll> tlllMlII J- .I.. ■ li- tL *it IcAL&.r p-M, c.u=>^er;;r, ; r • •• ♦.> • »#J\. • rf » • » < V • • V “» • • « • ,vm1 PJW»- iCUT 4 * / IN^uUc* &VlO«T. 9 » " -1^ \ "^Fy^O UJ-eh w /\ I'. I • •-V VV<7FK^ bSMOri *, * • »^ • . « oLce.. : *“• • ** .: . H -.*.*•■'• ........................................................... • . , * . ^•11 % f 4 •<.• *il >V • ^ - •• . - * * «.• M^lFf EXI STING' ^?^EH|NG> . J f k t » <r • # ' •• ‘ * # •' • -• 0 m 4*' . • :-• % * -.* i I ^ t. • ’ w • ____ • m - >* '. ' •' ' V • 1. ^**.. • ••.k -. . r »•*.. %k v» •• • *•- y I* ■• ■. • V * • . t*«; •% *• i 1* *• • ! I J '•. •• •, V • ’ , J.\ '. '« • • m - . 4 •• » .--*. •^0 • •• * ^ •■♦k ,• - m • •4 f ^ >‘* .* •• -. |V »•'CC-l ( •n , ,f^e.L^c»^T e c? ■ e?P•A^^E“p5? ^ I.- HfUff :. rzv.rt~7nn7rn|T|l~^' •'*y-.-►..-. > • . ‘ , 4 • • * • .• . ...... £/« v»dSeff^ * • • • •> " ^ ' .‘.V .• • , •1P/t^ 41. . .. • •♦•'•• ♦ ^ «,•! . ^ ..^4 -J| .» • -f -»4. - . «. • ♦. •! .<5 • • ••• 4 • • 4. ? ^ N .- <DI^ -)- V ito;i;iVIS xn HI TT II / \ y\llSrL u. \ // a'-£7/ e-'-<v" 3re>*C»^hO “f^P to I NO U L/^T B D Rr><s?F*o " OIZ.&S- K><v*w^ /^KEr p2?)^ Pi<^. c^eer g&T^I u^' /^FCrilTScTT 127 V&P-IF-r vT^I Finr^u AP c TWITECT tjp VeFlFY WINC^VV P-epL/^BMFNT c^C^^POlN/’^Tc: pecpicON Lcpct /^tkon •/SpcJHIT&CT TO» V&P-IFT ‘OHINCLG i typo /-np w| r-irp “. • 7 —f------ . • •• I ..t •.........v'te;>-' ■• I <• . *•' .'•«» ':• -v /V. S **fc f *** ^*'11 I 'rf * I ^ ;■. f .;: ‘ y;. . ';v*;v i ■ >: -|*. v: ■';(#■'S' i%!> •• t1 ■ \ kSte* |4*w .AAC. .1 .1 yI '( ;.j•;i ■■•j '•* .1 N •f'U(’/( 73 /»H Tj/DTI 7? 7® • /I 37' 56' 5?’ B 57' VO' 5-6'6 7?' «I : r XI To: From Date: Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator January 13, 1992 Subject: #1710 Richard Bloomquist - Super Valu - 3333 Shoreline Drive - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: B-3, Commercial Shopping Center District Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.03, Subd. 12 - Crowding Principal Building. No accessory building or structure unless an integral part of the principal building, shall be erected, altered or moved within 10' of the principal building, nor within 10* of another accessory structure. A wooden storage shed for storing salt is located approximately 1-2* from principal structure. The structure is 15' x 8' and measures 8' in height. Required = 10' Existing “ 1+' Variance = 8+ or 80% List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List/Certificate of Mailing C - Plat Map D - Survey/Site Plan Approved with Recent Addition E - Large Scale Copy of Site Plan - Partial Description of Request Review Exhibits D and E. In reviewing the comprehensive Improvement plans for the recent addition, a 15' x 8' storage shed was not designated. The storage shed has existed in the same location on the property for over 10 years. The shed is approximately 1 to 2 feet from the principal structure. The issue for staff is that if it is to remain, certain applicable fire code standards will require firewall construction on the side adjacent to the structure and the roof. Note the wooden overhang of the structure is directly above the 8' high shed. There is no record of a building permit being Issued for the structure. Applicant advises that it was an error that the salt storage shed was not placed on the current improvement plan. The applicant has asked that it be allowed to remain. • - -r—— - - - - -1- - Zoning File #1710 January 13, 1992 Page 2 Hardship Statement Please review Exhibit A. Applicant notes the following: 1. Structure has existed on the property for approximately 15 years. 2. Based upon the limited parking area and traffic/access plan approved for site, there is no other available area for salt shed. Options of Action If applicant's request is denied, relocated 10' from principal structure. struit must be If approved, applicant must upgrade the structure to meet State fire code standards. Isv 1 CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no cha.ige from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) # V ■\ r-TTV nr nu-rrAin UA I I vt PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address County Roads 15 & 121) :^33.3 Shorel ine -Dc — rv*M*/-r ,-ccTrc I Aftmtui. i/I f i Tw) v/V»/Vin {?i j?5.o^ TOT^L 175.00 ±Iavarii^ffijN 55392 i25.<?0 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 24 Attach legal description to application if no_ included CH£C}(vv required survey. Attachment RECEIPT-7hm YOU ^231330 CQOl ROl Wr , ii i-.^n T / : va.' \/^f . APPLICANT Name Richard Bloomauist Phone (home) Phone (work) 471-8473 Address: 3333 Shoreline Drive_________ City: ----------------Zip:_iS122, OWNER (if different than applicant) MGT Company Name Martin Ehlers/ President _____ Phone (home) Address: °~ Date Property Acquired Phone (work) »^n7-^?7-Q40Q__ Redwood Falls_____Zip t 56283 (month/year) 1 («W) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT OSE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Dse of Property Grocery Store Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $. Describe request in detail: Variance request for salt storage shed in^ of store wl VARIANCES BBQUIBBD Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) Othe’" Permission to leave salt storage shed in place ARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; This storage facility -.^s been on site----- for at least 15 vears> due to an error it was left off the aporoved plan.--------------- bscription op unusual property conditions . w , • Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning code Due to the retail opecar.ions of this business, there is no_ other appropriate area for this storage facility.- - - - ---- - - -- -- - - - - -- &QUIRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). . Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to inolnde hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy Sij xll for reproduction). . u Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes i' existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 0%"xll"). Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8-"r11"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate lis o any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. he Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please Member that vonr variance application is not complete if the abo^ wfrt-niMi-Hon has not been included. ►PLICANT'S SIGNATURE j .. te applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or ,quested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff pplied is true and cop^^ ^^^he b^^ of his/l)pr knowledge. plicant's Signature.Date mer' s Signature Not Available ____________________ Date Hfgnfi SIGNATURE ie owner herc-by ackowledges and agrees to this application and further thorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, ents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga on And vAirification of this rsquBSt. iplioant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the .anning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held onILAIinjLllM WWW -------------------------- ^ ^ ^ 1 bird Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all schedule Ewiew meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is lable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements have an ithorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & « ^ ffice of this change prior to the meeting. r • \i * •• 1 .1 I .i. : : i»‘1 RUN DATE 10/17/90 [ : 1'^ ; • ’ \ \ t • ‘BATCH 004 ’ • •* ■• * i; . »« *! PROP ADOR OHNER NAttE TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR HENNEPIN • ■ .•-•At: , . la'-'*-’ •• V.'- ••• :•••? ■.*. ‘58 17-117-25 45 0099 ■ 05400 ‘ <SHORELINE OR * D S JOHNSON ARE JOHNSON DALE S JOHNSON 5400 SHORELINE DR NAVARRE HN .55592 [' COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OTfTERS LIST • I .A 1 4 ^ V PROP ADD.l OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 20-117-23 11 0002 02420 8HADYHOOO RO %■ ;;‘\T i 38 17-117-23 44 0100 03382 SHORELINE DR ^ DONALD H ULRICK ETAL GLASS II PARTNERS 14600-28TH AVE N PLYMOUTH m 55441 B0YA6EUR'SERVICE CENTERS ‘ I VOYAGEUR.SERVICE CENTER^ CO RO 15 A 17 NAVARRE MN 55392 I ' TER5 ** I' 1 38 20-117-23 11 0015 02445 SHADYHOOD RO 1ST NATL BANK OF NAVARRE 1ST NATL BANK OF NAVARRE CO ROAD 15 A CO ROAD 19 NAVARRE MN 55392 I • ' ’ t i. •• PROP ADDR OltlER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 20-117-23 11 0018 ^ 02455 SHADYHOOD RO . PAUL H EN6LUND ETAL ' PAUL H A JEANNE M EN6LIM) PO BOX 448 * HOUND m 55364 •f / y V* * .i • ♦ I . • 38 20-117-23 11 0024 03333 SHORELINE OR MGT COMPANY SUPER VALU STORES INC CORPORATE TAX DEPT PO BOX 990 MPLS 55440 1 -■!' • . i < •1 > • • •38 20-117-23 11 0034 i •* • ' .i-38 20-117-23 12 0034 t PROP ADDR 02500 SHADYHOOD RD • •M ' 03423 SHORELINE DR • ♦OHNER NAME UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 4 4* 1 . ■ /RICHARD M KEAVENY ET. - • • •TAXPAYER UmV OF HINN-REAL EST OFF. 'T > 'RICHARD M KEAVENY 1 NAME/ADOR HORILL HALL RM 335 f ,4 • . ■ J P 0 BOX 59 1 100 CHURCH ST 'v •' ■ •i! •> ; NAVARRE MN 55392 f • •$MPLS MN 55455 ' • 1• f ■ ■ 38 20-117-23 12 0053 .1 38 20-117-23 12 0054 PROP ADDR 02501 KELLY AVE 02503 KELLY AVE• •OHI^R NAME JAMES K LINDSAY ‘•4* • • •JAMES K LINOSAY • • ft •‘ TAXPAYER DANIEL T LINOSAY . DANIEL T LINOSAY NAME/ADDR 2321 HUNTINGTON PT RD E HAYZATA MN 55391 .. I 2321 HUraiNGTON PT RD E HAYZATA Tt4 55391 'i I 1. I 9. I PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR « • TOTAL BATCH 004 00015 ^ • L t'. » ' 7 * • 4 I I •♦ I f • 4 • • I: REPORT NO. PI435401 8,, PAGE *7. ■. V •. •* . t . 56 17-117-25 44 0101 05560 SHORELINE DR Lie KOEHNEN LEROY t CAROL KOEWTEN 26020 VALLEYHOOO .EXCELSIOR HN 55551. • • * •. I • •• •4 ! Vt if •r 4 « •• • . r f58 20-117-25 11 0017 02455 SHADYHOOD RD ; JARIBO INC ' .*• f JARIBO INCORPORATED ' . 4545 ENCHANTED ‘ ‘, SHOREHOOD MN L. ’ A '• ' ■:y •ir •t V*4 «• f f « • •n 38 00038 .V 20-117-25 11 0052 ... ADDRESS UNASSIOIED * U • 1ST NATL BAMC OF NAVARRE- '• *.7.' r. i 9- /* • r*i • • 1ST NATL BANK OF NAVARRE P 0 BOX 125 NAVARRE HN 55592 m • » •“> * !•'• • % *, .'.i 38 20-117-23 12 0046. 02505 KELLY AVE PETER CHOH MARY MANAGT^KT PO 235 CHANHASSEN W 55317 •• %* »• \' \ • I. 38 20-117-23 12 0055 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED OARYLE L UPHOFF ET AL OARYLE L UPHOFF 2497 KELLY AYE EXCELSIOR m 55331 4 1 %*.. • i . . i A • .• •. 1 w • < ' *• * • • *.• '•iT* I, f.t : •• • • \ ; . j : I -J »* , \ u i ••• • '-w CERTIFICATE OP MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OP HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO ) ss. Ir Jamie Bosmar of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1710, wan mailed to the attached list of property owners . In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 7th day of January, 1992. tMu^ i/. ru/T g.M OROMO-33 CcC.f • GOVT LOT 3 GOVT lot 3 GOVT lot Z «— m*«in l« ^ m CM in • m 1 11 ! s ^ 1 in r / ./,.y./'///r ..Kl| ,.!i>k 4. ■ , I 0 1^ I .Jl. « • ' • l*U ft' •4rX">: 9«oBCiiNe -------*i4MM M>jyi fjii0f>CLiH6 --------- MM •> Ml GOVT lot 4 GOVT LOT 4 (13) COVT lOT I D CasRD. 15 XO. RO IS VUtlabU VTdnr lUOCTOf N unc tract d -----Ni?**>rsoi iiooo----- WITH tract D bJ2.Ut^-P> t|, , :ni •O.VT*■»» V-4.4.. '* " '* «»T ^rr IM ^ rScz ' ' -jCX.... .... A. ^. • . 4-«. ;:v7i>f ••-j:--. - I 5T0RT COUC tlOCtC ’ surcfi VALU FLOOR CL. 95*7.0 \fC. Nil I lit ^rj OflN 5FACC, CiNiCiVATlOM 4 HWNiCirAi UT1LIT1I5 E9KT. ^ ^iieTEimqN iK^ X i ■ilC 1-:# I*.’ - • ■trV* •• • /''/ rC■\\•^4SiTE or LAM50ON PAP.K CorniTk£ rcia ; i i ^ ^ ^ - -.___ - A ■ .. ST-^. • ;f?i LvS; - ' ** ' . o •• . Ij, lakr ‘5hor€Single Famliy ‘ *\ ‘ \i .» 1J r Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Prom Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:January 16, 1992 Subject: Entrance Monuments or Area Identification Signs Criteria/Standards Review of Pertinent Ordinances 1. 2. List Section 10.03, Subd. 16. Traffic visibility. No fences, structures or plantings more than 3' high in the residential district on corner lot shall be permitted to obstruct traffic visibility within a triangular area defined as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the projected curb lines of two intersecting streets, thence 30 feet along one curb line, thence diagonally to a point 30 feet from the point of beginning on the other curb line, thence to the point of beginning. Section 10.61, Subd. 2 - Signs in residential district. A. Neuneplates. 1) One nameplate sign for each dwelling and such sign shall not exceed 2 square feet in area per surface and no sign shall be so constructed as to have more than two surfaces. 2) One nameplate sign for each dwelling group of six or more units and such sign shall not exceed 6 square feet in area per surface and no sign shall be so constructed as to have more than two surfaces. C.Setbacks. Any sign over 1/2 square foot shall be set back at least 5' from ary property line. No sign shall exceed 8' in height above the average grade level. Signs may be illuminated but such lighting shall be diffused or indirect. of Exhibits A - Plymouth Sign Ordinance B - Wayzata Sign Ordinance C - Eden Prairie Sign Ordinance D “ Sketch of Driveway Entrance Monument - Impact of Current Code E - Sketch of Subdivision Entrance Monument - Impact of Current Code F -• Elevation - Wildhurst Estates Driveway Montunents G - Site Plan - Wildhurst Estates Driveway Monuments Entrance Monuments January 16, 1992 Page 2 of 6 Planning Coannission Assignment To review the current ordinance as it relates to entrance monuments (or area designation signage) for subdivisions and private driveways. If necessary to develop additional criteria/standards for the placement, height and size of such monuments and allowed area for associated signage. The Planning Commission shall make a recommendation regarding the need to amend the code and direct staff to call for a public hearing at the February meeting and to prepare a draft of an amendment based on Planning Commission's direction. Review Infonnation Staff has contacted six other cities to determine how their ordinances deal with entrance monuments. The Codes of the other cities list entrance monuments under the signage section of the code defining them as identification signs - similar to Orono's code. The City of Plymouth's ordinances. Exhibit A, allows identification signage 20' from the front property line and limited to a total of 32 s.f. Each sign would be limited to 16 8.f. There is no mention of the maximum footprint allowed or area for monument. Eden Prairie (Exhibit C) allows 32 s.f. of total signage 10' from the property line. Each signage area would be limited to 16 s.f. and the base or footprint of monument limited to 16 s.f. (1/2 size of signage allowed for zoning district). Wayzata (Exhibit B) limits subdivision entrance monuments to a total of 32 s.f. with no mention of a special setback. A conditional use permit is required for all monuments with elaborate standards set up for their review during preliminary subdivision review. The City of Orono's procedure has been to review them at final plat approval time along with road name approvals. The City of Eagan has no limit on total signage or on footprint of monument with a street setback of 10'. The height of the structure is limited to 7' with signage area of structure limited to 4*. The City of Minnetonka based their standards on the density of a subdivision, i.e. if a subdivision was a low density, total signage would be limited to 30 s.f. with a base of 75 s.f. The height would be limited to 6' and the setback 10*. The person also noted traffic visibility concerns as with Orono code for corner lots. The City of Minnetrista requires a Conditional Use Permit for entrance monuments for subdivisions. The standards for signage area is 24 s.f., at maximum 6' height at a 10* setback. The code did not deal with limits on footprint or base. Entrance Monuments January 16, 1992 Page 3 of 6 Orono code limits signage for subdivisions to 6 s.f. in area per surface, 5' from a property line at a maximum height of 8'. The code also appears to limit use of monuments to subdivisions of 6 or more lots. Review Exhibits D and E. Note that the setback for signage is also restricted by the location of drainage and utility easements and the traffic visibility standard for corner lots. The majority of cities contacted did not have separate standards for monuments adjacent to private driveway. In fact staff members advised that building permits would not be required even with the need to assure clearance for emergency vehicles. As for private driveway signage the Orono code would allow signs at maximum area of 2 s.f. per surface 5' from any lot line at an 8* maximum height. Issues for Consldera1d.on The cod'!; allows an 8* maximum height for all residential nameplates or area designation signs (monuments). 1.Should the height standard be amended? If so, should it be higher or lower? 2.Should there be different height standards for structures identifying private drives and subdivision roads? 3.What is an acceptable height for such structures —- driveways ---- subdivisions? 4.Should the maximum height be determined by surrounding zoning densities? Rural vs. Urban. 5.Should the height be determined by the allowed height of a fence or wall at a proposed or desired setback? If the sign was placed within the front yard setback area, it would be limited to 3-1/2' or 42". If the sign is placed at the front street setback line, a 3-1/2++' structure would be allowed (this would be consistent with previous Council action). The code allows 2 s.f. per surface for single family residential nameplate signs and 6 s.f. per surface for subdivision nameplate signs. 1. Are the current area allowances acceptable? 2.Should the area of a driveway or subdivision nameplate sign be determined by the surrounding zoning densities? 1^. Entrance Monuments January 16, 1992 Page 4 of 6 3.Should the signage portion of the total structure be limited to a specific height? The code requires a 5' setback from all property lines for signs in excess of 1/2 s.f. 1.Please review Exhibits D and E. Recently platted lots will have 10' drainage and utility easements platted adjacent to all street lot lines. The current code ere ‘ ^ conflict as structures cannot be placed wi' . arainage and utility easements. Note also struc-ures to be placed on either side of private or public roads entering subdivisions are also subject to traffic visibility standards for all corner lots. The Current 5' standard also conflicts with this section. The code does hold that more restrictive setbacks will apply. 2.Is the 5' standard realistic, applicable, practical, etc.? Should the setback standard of the code be amended to more clearly reflect current zoning practices, i.e. minimum of a 10' setback? The code does not address standards for the base or footprint of structures or monuments on which such signage is installed. 1.Should the code have standards for footprint areas of monuments? 2.Should there be separate standards for driveway and entrance road monuments? 3.Should the area of the footprint be determined from the surrounding zoning district densities? 4.Should the footprint area relate to area of signage allowed for driveway nameplate (current code 2 s.f.) or entrance sign to subdivision (current code 6 s.f.)? Are there other issues that should be considered in determining criteria/standards for entrance monuments? 1.Lighting. (Review Section 10.31, Subdivision 2 (C) noted above) 2.Need for special land use review, i.e. conditional use permit required for all entrance monuments except when such monuments are part of a subdivision review. 3.Minimum separation setback between driveway monuments - to insure emergency vehicle clearance. F Entrance Monuments January 16, 1992 Page 5 of 6 4. 5. Landscape requirements. Covenants to address maintenance for all subdivision monuments in addition to requirements for creation of outlots or easements. 6. Others suggested by Planning Commission members. Options of Action To recommend an amendment of the code providing new standards and amending current standards for entrance monuments at private driveways or entrance roads to subdivisions. Reaffirm current code and require Planning Commission and Council approval of all entrance monuments as part of the preliminary subdivision approval and to continue to require variance applications when proposed private driveway monuments do not meet the current standards. REVIBW OF WILDHURST ESTATES EMTRAHCE MONUMENTS The developer of Wildhurst Estates presented signage plans for review and approval before the Council as part of the final subdivision review process. Because of the configuration of the land, a single entrance monument to the plat is not feasible. The Subdivider proposes four separate entrance monuments to each of the driveways within wildhurst Estates. It is difficult for staff to determine the actual scale but it appears the monuments are set 3' from the street lot line. The current code requires 5'. The monuments are currently located within a drainage and utility easement and must be placed at a minimum of 10' from the street lot line. The monuments are proposed at a 7-1/2' height, the current code allows 8' for residential nameplate signage . The area of the signage appears tc be 3' by 3’ for a total of 9 s.f. The code allows 2 s.f. for each surface of a residential nameplate. The base of the entrance monuments are 3' by 3 The code does not address an allowed base area. Options of Action for the Planning Commission To table all action on the current proposal until the City has completed the review of a proposed amendment of the code. i rr: Entrance Monuments January 16, 1992 Page 6 of 6 To act on the current proposal and to apply the current standards now in effect ” relocate structure out of 10' drainage & utility easement, area of nameplate signage limited to 2 s.f. not 9 s.f. as proposed. Based on your discussions with subdivider, to recommend an amendment of the current plan suggesting a less intense structure. Isv -» - .1.1^11 ■■ ■ ■ I' rmt- ■■ h I<~1 'Ml le I rii ■iTiim 01-14-1992 10:46 612 5505060 ClTV OF PLVMOUTH PLYMOUTH ZONING ORDINANCE Section 10, Subdivision A P.Ol b. One off-site directional sign shall be pemitted for the tSuwIna. church, cehool.’hospital. .club. Horary or similar use provided that the lion is located on private property which abuts a collector or arterial road leading to the subject use. NimtoUto SUM. Hamoplite Signs are 2hJfi*ithrs1onname and/or address of the primary use on the property where tne sign is located. c. A Nawplata Sign shall be pemitted on each ProP*^y S*;***"*!! * orlnarv use. provided the surface area does not exceed P *Jr SKvldli that a ffeestandlno sign Is located « from^front property lines, but in no case is located in any side yard. One freestanding Nameplate Sign JP*’’P!'"’J*?2uSls*'clubs institutional uses such as churches, schools, hospitals, clubs, libraries, municipal and otherlike* orovided that the maximum surface area shall be 32 sq. tt., and provided that the sign 1$ locatedproperty lines, but in no case is located in any side yard. Area Identification Signs,. Area Identification Siflns are intended for the identification of residential !!!;.!??multi-residential complexes; and, are also referred to as entrance monument signs. ssniimjnii?nrs4]i2r.r‘i^;idS;t?:rirb5|vi}^M^^ of this Section, residential subdivisions shall include platted phases of approved staged developments. >• The Area Identification signage shall be located at the entrance ■ iion.to the project or subdivis wsr !!.'s s:Ta’sS ?? IIKlJlflon. An”ro» tdontlflejtlon Sign sh. 1 bo l^Jtod ot lust 20 ft. fro* the front property ’<»•». "J “»• **'•”it be located in any side yard. (Amended Ord. No. 85-07) PbaWt** brand fax transmittal rnamo 7871 ••fp»s««® 2- COb v4n3-g»Sfo . fii# 10-2 k PLYMOUTH ZONING ORDINANCE Section 10, Subdivision A (4) When such signs are proposed and constructed by an jndivi ' firm other than the individual or association who will be Individual or r.»ponsib1. for th.».1nt.n«nee, th.ro •h*’! subdivision, to be approved by the City Attorney,Scored on the property title(s) prior to of the Sign Permit. Further, appropriate approved signs on the P»*0P®**ty ®to be located; the easements shall be recorded pnor to the issuance of the Sign Permit. . d. Tnor«rv Sloin. Tnipor.ry $1»n» •$ »rov(d.d heroinannounce .nd pronot* dev»1op«ent» and .vontt, and to direct parson* to these activities which are of limited duration. One Temporary Sign announcing thelots and/or buildings, or one temporary ,architects, engineers, contractors, or suppliers, * total surface area of 96 sq. ft., not exceeding more than 16 ft. in height, and not less than 2 ft. above the ground shall be permitted on the property under developmer^. Such ^^jns shall be setback at least 20 ft. from front property ]ine». «nd shall not be located in any required side yard. Such signs shall be allowei for three years from the date of original i-issuance or until 85% Of the construction in the development is cSSplJud, Jii1?h m first, unless otherwise specifically provided in this Subdivision. (Amend. Ord. 90-30) One Temporary Sign related to^thejale, ;els and liparcels and Tots^ primary buildings of primary buildings, and of areas within shall be less than 8 sq. ft. in surface area, with a surface area not to exceed s Sign and tne owner of the land, sha r^ved _ihtO-th.cea. the'owner or manager of the halTbe equally responsible for thS proper location, «.1ntw.nco, and ultlMto »1gn.^tb.ck r.qu)r«iwnt* wy b. w.1..d for jueh frM»t.nding signs, provldod that th.y ar* located on Rfl*®** express consent of th. property ouner. andCOnSCflw Of who prOpOrXy own^r$ mnu jifWemwei V'f not Impede safety by obstructing vision of JT.?!.?*’vehicle operators.. No other temporary sign shall be permitted. (Amend. Ord. 90-38) One Temoorarv Real Estate Sign located off the site being Sveloped in^Plymouth shall not exceed 16 sq. ft. JJ*®®' shall not exceed 6 ft. In height, and shall not exce^ 8 ft. in width. Such signs shall be setback at least 20 ft. ^>*05 ff®]JJ property lines. Off-site Temporary Directional ‘ijn* jhal1 be located at least 200 ft. from any ot*^®** “J^®!! ?STJu?ficeother temporary directional signs, provided that the total surface aroa of all such grouped signs shall not exceed 32 sq. ft. iO-3 rc 1 Tiflrnniniiii ri rriii itfiiiitiiTii iiliiirtiiiinii'iiiflllllllli'ltilli j ni 1 • •!» » » vr 4 If! I wJ-! t 521.09-12. For ground/low profile and monument signs, the copy or graphic area shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of the potential maximum gross surface area, unless approved as a conditional use permit. 521.09-13. Where there are special approved design features on a building such as cupolas, steeples, domes, chimneys, etc., a wall sign may be erected on such an architectural feature subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit in accordance with all Conditional Use Permit procedures as set forth in this Section and this Ordinance. In no case shall the sign exceed the gross or total allowable sign area permitted. 521.09-14. Independent of the total allowable sign area for individual residences in the R-IA, R-1, R-2 and R-3 Zoning Districts, two (2) ground/low profile or monument project identification signs for residential areas with six (6) or more lots may be allowed by Conditional Use Permit for each entrance to a unified project area consistent with the following provisions; 521.09-14-1 New subdivisions; a. Each sign structure may not exceed a total of thirty-two (32) square feet in area. b. Signs are to be located on outlets of sufficient size and area to accoimnodate them or within a dedicated permanent sign easement. A homeowners or neighborhood association is required for the area identified by the signs which shall own and be responsible for the up)<eep, perpetual maintenance, taxes, insurance, utilities, and other costs associated with the sign(s) and their property. The association rules or by-laws shall specify how the aforementioned sign respon­ sibilities will be delegated and paid for. City staff shall review the proposed bylaws to ensure that they specify the aforementioned re.sponsibilities. c. Outlets or easements for signs are to be considered and planned for at the time of preliminary plat application and will be included in the final plat. The development contract between the City and the developer shall specify the designated use of the outlot or easements, its ownership and the respective home owners association responsibilities regarding the proposed improvements. / t. L u. ^ n. I A * tmm ’ _ A • • - • • M I • '^ • • 1 13 d. Project identificacion signs as herein, shall be limited to a definable project area. provided for unified and e. Lighting o£ signs may be allowed. The electric costs and maintenance of such lighting shall be the responsibility of the homeowners association or neighborhood association of the area identified by the sign(s) and shall be clearly noted in the association's rules or bylaws. f. The area around the sign is to be landscaped and maintained in such a manner as to accent and enhance the sign while remaining sensitive to the natural features of the site. Detailed landscape plans shall be included with each sign permit application and shall be subject to review by the Design Review Board. q. The design and construction of residential area identification signs shall be done with the highest quality materials and workmanship to keep maintenance and upkeep costs to a minimum and to minimize the potential for vandalism. Residential area identification signs are to be aesthetically Pleasing when designed and constructed. The signs shall be compatible with nearby or potential homes and other structures in the construction plans and a materials list shall be included with the Conditional Use Permit application. h. The City reserves the right to require the removal, at the owner's expanse, of any sign when the requirements of this Section .. Ordinance are not completelv followed and adhered to or if the sign is not properly maintained or falls into a state of disrepair. The City shall not have any obligation or liability to any sign or nearby landscaping when removed by the City. 521.09“14“2. Existing Subdivisions: A low profile identification sign may be allowed, subject to the procedures set forth in and regulated by this Section and other applicable City ordinances, for existing residential area plats. If no outlots or easements are designated for signs, the ft-hP«accordance with the minor subdivision section the Wayzata Subdivision Ordinance, to provide for such proposal and shall meet the same criteria and requirements'as set forth for new subdivisions. ,11 11 1 Iiwyiiy I|, J |» .iPfif 1^ "I- /m^7 CROUNDyLOW PROFILE FREE STANDING MONUMENT I; PYLON (REF SIGN TABLE 811.09)MAX AREA 35 SO FT MAX AREA 35 SO FT MAX AREA 75 SO FT ii ■'i' Illustration of Sign Types oi iMA 2.The Council shall base its decision upon these considerations and shall draft a resolution appioving or rejecting the application for a Family Care Home for Social Rehabilitation Programs for specified reasons. The resolution must be passed by a majority of the Council. W 6. Source: Ordinance No. 18*82 Effective Date: 9-17-82 (Sections 11.67 through 11.69, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.) SECTION 11.70. SIGN PERMITS. Subd. 1. Purpose and Intfwt- Tlie purpose of this Section is to protect and promote the general welfare, health, safety, and order within the City through the esUblishment of a comprehensive and impartial scries of standards, nfgiil.rinn. sod procedures governing the erection, use and/or display of devices, signs or symbols serving as visual cooununicative media to persons situated within or upon public right-of-way or private properties. The provisions of this Section are intended to encourage creativity, a reasooable degree of freedom of choice, an opportunity for effective romtniinirari on , and a seosc of coucem fof the visual amenities on the part of those designing, displaying or otherwise utilizing needed communicative media of the types regulated by this Section; while at the same time assuring that the public is not endangered, annoyed or distracted by the unsafe, disorderly, mdiscriminate or unnecessary use of such communicative facilities. Subd. 2. Definitions. The following terms, as used in this Section, shall have the meanings stated: 1. ‘Accessory Sign* - An identification sign relating in its subject matter to or which directs attention to, a business or profession, or to the commodity, service or entertainment sold or offered upon the premises where such sign is located, or to which it is attached. 2. "Address Sign* - PosUl identification numbers and/or name, whether written or in numeric form. 3. "Area Identification Sign* - A free-standing sign located at an entranceway to a residential development identifying such development having a common identity when said sign is located upon the premises which it identifies. 4. ’Banners and ’Pennants* - Attention-geUing devices which resemble flags. Source: City Code Effective Date: 9-17-82 5. ’Canopy and Marquee’ - A rooflike structure projecting over the entrance to a building. Source: Ordinance No. 18-91 Effective Date: 8-23-91 ’Directional Sign’ - A sign which is erected on private property by the owner of such property for the purpose of guiding vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Such signs bear no advertising mformation. Source: City Code Effective Date: 9-17-82 11-84 :i: ■|t I. , •• ‘wlw Ml , u* >u I * •* i';I i •! ' I « •i L 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. •Directional Signs for Churches, Schools, or Publicly Owned Land or Buildings ’ - A sign which bears the address and/or name of a church, school, or publicly owned land or building and a directional arrow pointing to said location. Source: Ordinance No. 37-83 Effective Date: 9-30-83 Tree-standing Sign* - A pylon or monument sign which is placed in the ground and not affixed to any part of any structure. Source: Ordinance No. 18-91 Effective Date: 8-23-91 •Height* - The distance between the uppermost portion of the sign and the average natural grade of the ground immediately below the sign. 'Illuminated Sign* - Any sign which is illuminated by an artificial light source. •Institutional Sign' - Any accessory sign which identifies the name and other characteristics of a public or private institution, such as convalescent, nursing, rest, boardmg care home or day care center. Source: City Code Effective Date: 9-17-82 •Menu Board Sign* - Any sign which has a message related to the site’s food service and the copy is manually changed. 13. *Motion Sign* - Any sign which revolves, rotates or has any moving parts or message, Source: Ordinance No. 18-91 Effective Date: 8-23-91 'Multi-tenant* - Structures containing two or more businesses, uses or occupants. 'Nameplace or Identification Sign* - An accessory sign which bears only a name and/or address. 'Neighborhood/Sector Sign* - A free standing sign which identifies by name, the section of the City designated on the official sector map. •Newspaper Receptacle' - A box or container intended for the temporary storage of newspapers or magazines prior to delivery. 'Newspaper Vending Machines* - A coin-operated machine from which newspapers are sold to the general public. •Non-Accessory Sign* or 'Advertising Sign* - A sign relating in its subject matter to, or which directs attention to, a business or profession, or to the commodity, service or entertainment not sold or offered upon the premises where such sign is located, or to which it is attached. 'Non-conforming Sign* - A sign which lawfully existed immediately prior to the adoption of this Section, but does not conform to the newly enacted requirements of this Section. 11-85 (^3 ■ 21.'Parapet Wall' - An architecturally, structurally and aesthetically integral wall extendmg above the roof level, continuously around the perimeter of the building which has the primary purpose of screening equipment. 22. 'Permanent Sign’ - Any sign which is not a temporary sign Source: City Code Effective Date: 9-17-82 23. U !; •Pliimed Unit Development Area Identification Sign" • A ftee-standing sign located at an eottance way lo a Planned Unit Development identifying a Planned Unit Development land development havmg a common identity when said sip is located upon the premises which it identifies. A PUD area identification sign may not identify a tenant or tenants. Source: Ordinance No. 18-91 Effective Date: 8-23-91 (Prev. Ordinance No. 261 Effective Date: 10-25-74 24.'Portable Sign' - A sign so designed as to be movable from one location to another which is not permanently attached to the ground or any structure. 25.'Projecting Sign' - Any sign attached to a building, all or part of which extends more than 12 mches over public '/foperty, easements, or private pedestrian space, or which extends more than 12 inches beyond the rjrfate of the portion of the building to which it is attached or beyond the building Ibe. Source: City Code Effective Date: 9-17-82 26. 'Rcaderboard Sign' - Any sign having a message not permanently affixed to the sign face, and the copy is manually changed. Source: Ordinance No. 18-91 Effective Date: 8-23-91 27. 'Religious Symbols' - Piettues, designs, sculpmres, or similar objects that stand for or suggest religious faith, ideas, or qualities. Source: Ordinance No. 37-83 Effective Date: 9-30-83 mm • 11-86 i; X 4V •ll ll t 1 il K I I r- L/..: ■ki^ 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. •Roof Sign* - Any sign erected upon or projecting above the roof of a strucmre to which it is affixed except signs erected below the top (the cap) of a pa*apet wall. Source: Ordinance Mo. 114-84 Effective Date: 11-1-84 •Shielded Ught Source* - Means that all Ught elements will be diffused or directed to eliminate glare and housed to prevent damage or danger. Direct illuminated signs must be shielded with a translui^t matenal of sufficient opacity to prevent the visibUity of the Ught source. Indirect light sources must be^uip^ with a housing and directional vanes. The Ughts must not be permitted to mterfere with traffic signalization. •Sign* - Any letter, word or symbol, device, poster, picture, stotuary, reading matter or represcnUtion m the nature of advertisement, announcement, message or visual communication, whether painted, posted, printed, affixed or constructed, including aU associated brackets, braces, supports, wires and structures which is displayed for infonnational or conunumcalivc purposes. "Sign Area" - That area which is included in the smallest rectangle which can be made to circumscribe the sign. The stipulated maximum sign area for a free-standing sign refers to a single facing and does not include vertied structural members below the sign face. Source: City Code Effective Date: 9-17-82 •Sign Base* - The sign base of a sign shall be any supportive structure below or surrounding the sign area which has location on the ground. The sign base shall not exceed one half the maximum sign size pemitted in the zoning district. Source: Ordinance No. 9-87 Effective Date: 5-7-87 •Signage Program* - Any application for approval of construction or display of one or more signs under this Section. 34, *Sitting Facility Sign* - A sign which is affixed to a seating facility or enclosure at a transit facility stop. Source: City Code Effective Date: 9-17-82 35. *Street FronUge* - The abutting of a parcel of land to one or more streets. An interior lot has one street frontage, and a comer lot has two such frontages. Each allowed sign must relate to the street frontage geoerating the allowance. Source: Ordinance No. 18-91 Effective Dale: 8-23-91 36. *Temporary Sign* - A sign which is erected or displayed for a limited period of time. 11-87 A. 1 37.’Traffic Sign' - A sign which is erected by a govemmenlal unit for the purpose of regulating, directing or guiding traffic. Source: City Code Effective Date: 9-. 7-82 38.'Wall Area* - Is computed by multiplying the distance from the floor to th(> roof times the visible continuous width including windows and doors of the space occupied by the «:gn owner. Source: Ordinance No. 114-84 Effective Date: 11-1-84 39. 'Wall Sign* *- Any sign which is affixed to a wall of any building. Subd. 3. General Ravisioiis Applicable to All Districts. A. B. C. D. Source: City Code Effective Date: 9-17-82 Prohibitions. 1.Non-accessory signs are prohibited in all districts, except in areas where Section 11.71 permits advertising signs, subject to the conditions imposed by Section 11.71 upon advertising signs, (and except as otherwise expressly permitted in this Section 11.70). Source: Ordinance No. 105-84 Effective Date: 9-20-84 2.Accessory signs are prohibited in all districts, except as authorized by this Section. All signs shall be constructed in such a manager and of such material that they shall be safe and substantial, provided that nothing in this Section shall be interpreted as authorizing the erection or construction of any sign not now permissible under the zoning or building provisions of the City Code. All signs must be maintained in a safe non-deteriorating manner. Cracked, broken or bent, glass, plastic, wood or metal and bumt-out light bulbs and peeling, faded, or cracked paint must be repaired, replaced, or removed. Source: City Code Effective Date: 9-17-82 No illuminated sign which changes in either color or intensity of light, flashes, scrolls, or is animated shall be permitted except one giving lime, dale, temperature, weather or similar public service information. The City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, in granting permits for such signs shall specify the hours during which same may be kept lighted when necessary to prevent the creation of a nuisance. Such signs shall have a shielded light source and concealed wiring and conduit and shall not interfere with traffic signals. Said signs shall not exceed SO square feet in size. Only one such sign shall be permitted per lot. Said signs shall conform to the district regulations contained herein. Source: Ordiiunce No. 1-90 Effective Date: 2-1-90 No sign other than governmental signs shall be erected or temporarily placed within any street right-of- way, or upon any public easement. 11-88 (5 ••M ii MI. I •"ii ! il :| i| :ii BB. Newspaper receptacles shall not display advertising legends or be obtrusive in color. Source: City Code Effective Date: 9-17-82 CC. A Planned Unit Development must be 15 or more acres and contain at least 3 contiguous lots to support an Area Identification Sign. DD. The sign base shall not exceed one half the maximum sign size permitted in the zoning district. Source: Ordinance No. 9-87 Effective Date: 5-7-87 EE. Temporary Help Wanted Sign. One temporary help wanted sign per lot for the purpose of hiring persons to woric on the property shall be permitted on the property provided such signs do not exceed 32 square feet and is removed within 14 days. Source: Ordinance No. 1-90 F.<Tectivc Date: 2-1-90 FF. GG. Readerboard Sign. Such signs may be used within a : ,r nitted sign area. Menu Board Sign. One menu board sign per restaurant use t’- :!rive-ihru facility. Such sign <hail not exceed 32 square feet in size nor greater than eight feet in height. Such sign is m addition to the free­ standing or wall sign in the District. Source: Ordinance No. 18-91 Effective Date: 8-23-91 Subd. 4. District Regulations. In addition to those signs permitted in all districts, the following signs are permitted in each specific district, and shall be regulated as to size, location and character according to the requirements herein set forth. Source: City Code Effective Date: 9-17-82 Residential Districts R, R-1, RM: Source: Ordinance No. 18-91 Effective Date: 8-23-91 (Prev. Ordinance No. 72-84 Effective Date: 4-05-84) 1.Identification Signs. One identification sign or symbol per building not greater than six square feet in area, provided such sign is atUched flat against a wall of a building. Source: City Code Effective Date: 9-17-82 11-92 ^.............. i • I m B. 2.Area Identification Signs. One area identification sign per development, per street entrance, providing such sign does not exceed 32 square feet ir. area. 3. Sign Setback. Signs shall be placed no closer than ten feet to any street right-of-way line. Source: Ordinance No. 18-91 Effective Date: 8-23-91 4. 5. 'f. Maximum Height of Free-Standing Signs; Six feet. Sign Base. (Refer to Subdivision 3, Subparagraph DD). ^ ^ Institutional Signs. One sign per street frontage identifying an institution or an institutional complex shall be permitted within a multiple residential district. Such sign shall not exceed 24 square feet in area. Source: City Code Effective Date: 9-17-82 7. 8. 9. Temporary Signs. Shall be permitted only as permitted in Subdivision 3, Directional Signs: (Refer to Subdivision 3). Review Process: The signage program will be reviewed and approved by the City Manager, or the City Manager’s designee. Source: Ordnance No. 9-87 Effective Dale: 5-7-87 (Prev. Ordinance No. 72-84 Effective Date: 4-5-84) Commercial Districts: N-Com, C-Com, C-Hwy, C-Reg-Ser, C-Reg. Source: Ordinance No. 72-84 Effective Date: 4-5-84 1.Free-standing Signs: a.A building site having one street frontage may have one free-standing sign not to exceed 80 square feet. b.Where a building site has two or more frontages, one free-standing 80 square foot sign shall be permitted along one frontage. Additional frontages may each be permitted a free-standing sign not to exceed 36 square feet. FurtheruKre, in no case shall any free­ standing sign be closer than 300 feet to any other free-standing sign upon a building site. The distance between signs is to be measured from the edge of a sign face via a straight line. Menuboards and directional signs are exempt from this requirement. TC. ~ “ A Planned Unit Development Area Identification Sign shall be permitted according to Subdivision 3, Paragraph CC. One sign per street frontage is allowed provided the total 11-93 mr r M ift;' 'n-r^’ I ^1 1 K UK -t fi ~ / oo Rl?-/fl r ro' L ^ i So' t So* LR-(B ^ 2>S' R - / 6 - 3o* Sioe /s' LH-tC =-30| 'Sitifis' f^TOf/*/* /sS~lh-e<^' <Lo7^ J-HiC- •-#----—---- i A^\u_v \» £. X 01 > -C) K ‘li OV f^-rot^ y a-rjLin*^ - /*'/ *SY-K't»c7t»«**rf /^ >4/ bvdir^»«^^ u ur.hty ea^^vt.e.'d' <T7 p-v . o trhc ^ ^ 'S* - ■ t" ■.^ I Til 'i#pi ^|||f 11 I js: m «1' - •J*'* • • ^ • • • !- • •»ii— iir». _*v tSILl. -4*1-^ "T^lrl gr i*=c> 1 > J •• I -j-f--i- i /9 -l:i i • — •- •• ■— -* •• i» •• • • ■>« 1 1 { 1 • t ( 1 • ) 1 1 I \ I < 1 --. •_• .- •-• —f- « • :x3f 1 ___ 1 t(V 1 •• 1 iA\T I" ■1 11 — ---------- — 1i ^ 1 1 \ 1 1 i» f- [ • • • - • - - _________________ I • • • •• • •L » rjT • ••«••• ••••| ’^'1 •* «* 1 ^jv --