Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-24-2005 Council PacketIa Public A ttendance Meeting Date /- :>V-/> C ouncil □ Planning C ommission n Park C ommission □ Other Please filloutthe information requested BELOW FOR OUR CITV RECORDS. I. 2. 3. 4.. 5. 6.. 7. 8-. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agendn) NAME OR NU.MBER UAL A ai QiN> W AA4«MMMr«U»t J i r • ^ AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JANUARY 24,2005,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCII. CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items arc considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items arc available in the Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet. ROLL CALI JAN d 4 i!00b CONSENT AGENDA I. Approvc/Amend Cl f Y Or ohunu APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 2. Regular Council Meeting of January 10, 2005 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - JeffSoderslrom, Representalive PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Dave Rahn, Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINIS'l'KATOR'S RKPORI 3. //04-3010 Wayvata Design and Development, 120 Brown Road South - Pinal Subdivision Approval - Resolution 4. W04-3022 Phil Skoog, 280 Tonka Avenue - Variance - Resolution 5. W04-.3052 liric Vogstrom, 2618 ('asco Point Road - Variances - Resolution 6. W05-3071 Anthony Thomas Homes, 400 Leaf Street - Variances - Resolution 7. «05-3076 Gregory and Jeanne Gustafson, 1280/1290 Spruce Place - Variance - Resolution MAYOR/C:OUNCIL REPORT PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR’S REPORT CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 8. Navarre Tire Station - Change Onler No 2 anil Request for Payment No. 9 (Final) 9. Dakota Rail Trail - Resolution CITY AITORNEY'S REPOR T 10. LICENSES Kennel License Renewals Liquor License Special Event Permit Tobacco License Renewals * II BILLS 4 i* r ii if AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JANUARY 24,2005,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 20QS 01/24 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 02/02 02/07 02/10 02/14 02/21 02/22 02/28 Planning Commission Work Session, Wednesday, 5:30p.m. Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p.m. Council Work Session, Thursday, 5:45 p.m. Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. HOLIDAY, Presidents ’ Day Planning Commission Meeting, Tuesday. 6:00 p.m. Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 03/02- 03/03- 03/07 03/14 03/17 03/21 03/28 03/31 Planning Commission Work Session, Wednesday. 5:30p.m. Council Work Session, Thursday, 5:45 p.m. - Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p.m. - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. - Council Work Session, Thursday, 5:45 p.m. - Planning Commission Meeting, 6:00 p.m. - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. - Council Work Session, Thursday, 5'45p.m. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, January 10,2005 7:00 o’clock p.m. -rcT.i^c -------------------------------------JAN H 4 2e05 ROLL Cl I Y Uh OHONO 'llie Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present; Mayor Barbara Peterson; Council Members Jim White, Bob Sansevere, and Lili McMillan; City Attorney Thomas Barrett. Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, Planning Director Mike Gaffron, Public Service Director Greg Gappa, Engineer Tom Kellogg, and Recorder Jackie Young. Council Member Jim Murphy was absent. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. OATH OF OFFICE The oath of ofHce was administered to Mayor Barbara Peterson, Council Member Lili McMillan,and Council Member Jim White. CONSENT AGENDA I.APPROVE/AMEND Items 7,8,9,11,14,15,16,17,18,19,20, and 21 were added to the Con.scnt Agenda and Item 3 was removed from the Consent Agenda. White moved, Sanicvere seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2. REGUI.AR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 McMillan requested Page 21 under Mayor/Council rcjwrt be corrected to read MN/DOT has made another offer. McMillan moved. White seconded, to approve the minutes of the regular Orono City Council meeting of December 13,2004, as amended. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. NAVARRE FIRE STATION 3.NAVARRE FIRE STATION RESCUE VEHICLE C:HANGE ORDER Tony Roe, I^ng T^ake Fire Administrative Officer, addressed the City Council regarding the changes to the fire rescue vehicle specifications. Roe noted the total net cost of the additions and deletions amounts to $2,510 over the original amount of the bid. PAGE 1 r MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, Jaanary 10,2005 7:00 o ’dock p.ni. (Navarre Fire Station Rescue Vehicle, Continued) Roe updated the Council on the status or the Navarre Fire Station, and noted the heating system in the administrative portion of the building is not functional and that parts arc on order to correct the problem. Roe indicated 14 new additional recruits would be starting training in the near future. White moved, McMiilan seconded, to approve the change order for the Navarre Fire Rescue Vehicle, in the amount of $2,510, and to approve a budget adjustment in the Improvement and Equipment Outiay Fund to reflect the additional expenditure. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - RICK RICE, REPRESENTATIVE Rick Rice addressed the Council regarding the Park Commi.ssion ’s January meeting. Rice stated the majority of the discussion was centered around the l.ydiard Beach right-of-way lane. Rice indicated agreement was reached to open the gates partially and to install posts at the beach with the idea to relocate the gate down to the beach area. Rice stated by partially opening the gates it would allow ATV’s and snowmobiles to access that area without traversing across the gra.ss, which had ignited some concerns in the neighborhood. Rice indicated Gappa and himself, along with Jan Berg, met at Lydiard Beach to determine the location of the posts delineating the beach and parking areas, which should be completed this spring. Rice indicated the Park Commission also di.scussed the access situation with I.owiy Woods. Rice noted this park currently does not have access and that the Park Commission is looking at options to gain access to this area. Rice indicated a definite solution was not arrived at and that the Park Commission would like to continue to work with the neighbors in this area to arrive at a solution. Rice stated the Park Commission also discussed the funds that have been set aside for the Lurton Park and whether any excess funds following improvement of this area could be used elsewhere. PLANNING COMMllSSION COMMENTS - No RepreseutaHve was present. None PUBLIC COMMENTS None ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 4. #04-3016 WAYZATA DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT, 120 BROWN ROAD SOUm FINAL SUBDI VISION REVIEW Henry Iji/niar/. and Tom Ooodrum were present. PAGE 2 MINUTES OF TIIE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, January 10,2005 7:00 o’clock p.m. (/104-3016 Wayzata Design and Development, Continued) GalBion Ftnted the epplicants received preliminary plat approval in July. Gaffron noted final plans responding to City Engineer’s recent comments have been submitted. The City has received letters from two neighboring property owners expressing concerns with this application. Gaffron stated the applicants are proposing a seven lot Planned Residential Development, with the applicant having made the appropriate revisions to the preliminary plat drawing to show the areas to be protected via a conservation easement. The side setbacks for all lots have also been revised to 30 feet to ensure a minimum of 60’ separation between principal structures. Existing trees within the conservation casement areas will be preserved, with the applicant having agreed to walk the site with staff prior to site grading to establish which, if any, trees within the grading area can lie .saved or transplanted. Gaffron stated the applicant is proposing to plant trees every 40 feet along tlic private road as required by City Code and is also proposing additional trees west of lots 1 and 2 in an attempt to begin rc-establishment of the vegetated buffer in this area. Gaffron stated Staff is also recommending pruning of trees and removal of dead wood and damaged branches within the Conservation Easement, with the Homeowners Association being in charge of this area following construction of the development. Gaffron requested the Council discuss tire need for establishing a fund or funding mechanism to help maintain this area in the future by the Homeowners Association. The casement will also include a wood chip path, with the existing bridge in need of replacement, subject to irermits by the appropriate agencies. Gaffron stated the private road accessing this development has been redesigned to be centered on the 40- foot northerly corridor. Gaffron stated the applicant lias concluded in order to achieve the desired water runoff to the NURP pond, curb and gutter is required along the entire length of the private road. In addition, the grading plan indicates that the building pads fur all seven lots will be graded in at the time the home is designed. Gaffron noted it is likely that the elevation of the seven homes will be lower than what was originally proposed given the proposed elevation of the cul-de-sac, which would help to reduce the visibility of the residences. Gaffron stated in regards to stormwater management, preliminary plat approval was granted for seven lots predicated on the applicants’ assertion that the site contains at least 14 acres of non-wetland area and that tire MCWD had accepted the wetland delineation bused on the provided delineation report and the findings of the TEP panel. Tlic final plat .submitted depicts a 40’ by 470’ corridor that was not shown as wetland on any preliminary plat drawings and also was not depicted on any wetland delineation report provided to the City. The app^licant has indicated they arc in the process of filing the required wetland/buffer easements with Hennepin County to meet MCWI) requirements. Gaffron noted no provisions have been specified in tire covenants for maintenance of the stormwater jxrnds. Gappa stated to his understanding in the City’s previous subdivisions the homeowners associations have Irecn icsjronsible for maintaining the NURP ironds. Gaffi on indicated that language would need to be added to the covenant agreements. Gaffron indicated there are a number of issues Staff has regarding the developers agreement. The applicant is piO|X)sing to begin construction of a new home on Lot 3, which replaces the existing hou.se. PAGE 3 r MINUTRS OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, Janaary 10,2005 7:00 o'clock p.m. (#04-3016 Wayzata Design and Dcvchpmcnt, Continncd) prior to completion of the road. Staff has concerns with regard to contamination of the road base by vehicular traffic during road construction, with the City ’s Code reading that “building permits will not be issued to any lot which lot has access only onto proposed public or private street unless such street has been improved to the point so that it is adequate for vehicular access by the prospective occupant and by police and fire department and emergency vehicles.” It is Staffs recommendation that no building permits be authorized or issued until the road base and initial bituminous layer have been installed, subject to approval by the City Engineer. McMillan inquired whether dirt would be stockpiled on the site where the existing house is located. Gaffron stated that is what they are proposing at the present time. McMillan inquired whether a make-shifl road would be constructed in order to remove the existing house. Lazniarz indicated they would comply with the City ’s existing codes concerning the road. Gaffron stated a second item of concern is the applicant’s desire to place a dollar limit on his obligation to pay for City expenses related to the subdivision. Staff docs not support the inclusion of such a limit wdthin the developer’s agreement unless the limit is .set so high as to cover all conceivable expenses. Gaffron stated the homeowmer association covenants have been provided and are included within Council ’s packets. Gaffron noted the applicant has proposed no temporary or pennanent subdivision identification or monument signage for this subdivision; although such signage is contemplated within the proposed covenants. Such signage would need City approval and permits and must conform to location and design standards. Gaffron noted no street lighting has been proposed, with t'lc neighboring property owners expressing opposition to any street lighting. Orono ’s City Code at the present time does not require street lighting. Lazniarz stated they are in agreement with Gaffron on removing Item 3 contained in the developer’s agreement and that they would comply with City Code as it relates to Item 2. Mayor Peterson inquired about Item #1 dealing with a fund or funding mechanism for the homeowners association. I.azniar/ staled he would leave that up to the Council. Wliitc inquired whether the City could require private homeowners to remove dead trees on their property. Gaffron stated the City can. PAGE 4 J MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, January 10,2005 7:00 o ’clock p.m. (MI4-3016 Wayzata Design and Development, Continued) White commented in his view some type of arrangcnKnl needs to be arrived at to maintain the conservation casement. Tom Goodrum stated the homeowners association would be responsible for maintaining that area. McMillan noted there is a fair amount of woods in that area and that the fjture owners of these lots should be informed prior to purchase that they will be assessed a fee to maintain the easement. Goodrum stated they would make the future homeowners aware that tlicir homeowner fees would need to include fees to maintain the conservation easement. McMillan recommended that the agreement also identify removal of toxic weeds. Gaffron suggested language concerning maintenance of the casement also be included in the covenants. Lazniarz stated he did supply his attorney with some language concerning maintenance of conservation areas and that he is surprised that was not included in the covenant. McMillan stated in her view the maintenance of tliis outlet should be specifically defined to prevent healthy trees &om being removed. E)ouglas Coleman, 140 South Brown Road, indicated he lives to the east of this proposed development. Coleman stated he has a concern relating to the height of the structures. Coleman stated due to the topography of this area, they would prefer the 30-foot limit be kept. Gaffron indicated the City Code limited building height to no more than 30 feet and no more than 2 '/i stories. Gaffron stated the City ’s definition of a half-story is that the sidewalls where it hits the roofline caimot exceed three feet in height and that no more than M percent of the third story can have head room greater than five feet. Gar&on indicated it is not uncommon for homes that arc constructed today to have a height of 4S feet from low side to peak, and that in his opinion these structures could possibly have peak heights that could be as high as 45 feet above the walkout floor elevation. Gaffron indicated he is not aware of any subdivision within the City where the height of the structure was limited to something less than what was allowed by Code. Lazniarz indicated there would probably be a mixture of different type housing constructed in this area but that he has never personally worked on a two and a half story house, which is the maximum height allowed by the City. Coleman indicated he also has a concern regarding point number one found on page eight of Staffs report. Coleman stated he would prefer the language be changed to reflect that further development be prohibited. McMillan inquired what Coleman means by development. PAGES MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, January 10,2005 7:00 o’clock p.io. (#04-3016 Wayzata Design and Development, Continued) Coleman indicated further houses. Gaffron pointed out both of those areas arc located within the conservation easement and would require rezoning of the site and action by the council, which would necessitate notice to the neighbors. Gaffron stated he is unsure whether there would be a way for this council to prohibit future councils from allowing development to occur within those areas but that in his view it is unlikely to happen given the City’s current ordinances. Barrett indicated tlie easement provides for a very foreseeable and assured reliance to the new owners and neighbors that additional development would not happen. Danett stated future development of those areas would be difficult, noting that the City’s easement would have to be yielded, which would probably not happen. Barrett stated one option is to dedicate that easement to a third party, which in his opinion is not necessary in this case. Dave McCuskey, 130 Brown Road, noted a lot of his concerns have already been addressed, but that he still has a concern regarding possible lighting. McCuskey indicated he would like the rural character of this area pre.served. Gaffron stated the City’s lighting code stales that the light shall not be visible from outside property boundaries. Gaffron stated he would not be opposed to including language in the development agreement restricting lighting. Gaffron stated it is likely that some lighting would be installed for safety reasons but that lighting in the cul-de-sac has not been discussed. White pointed out that whatever covenants are approved on this development would likely be requested on the rest of the area. White stated in his view the developer is attempting to construct a subdivision that is in keeping with the rural character of Orono. Gaffron stated any monuments in the future would need to be located within the outlot or easement, with the developer needing to meet certain requirements of the City. Gaffron noted no monuments arc being proposed at the present time. McMillan inquired whether this road would actually have a road sign. Gaffron staled there would be a road sign and that the applicants are proposing a name of Creekside Trail for the private road. Gaffron noted there more than likely would be a bank of mailboxes located out by Brown Road since the Post Office generally does not accept individual mailboxes on private roads. McMillan inquired whether the homeowners in this subdivision would be required to do their own snow plowing. Gaffron stated the homeowners would be responsible for maintenance of that road and that a sign could be erected designating this as a private road. McCuskey inquired whether the bank of mailboxes would be required because it is a private road. PAGE 6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, Jannary 10,2005 7:00 o’clock p.m. (1W4*3016 Wayanta Design and Development, Continued) Gaffron stated his experience with the post office is that they do not like individual mailboxes in front of each lot because it is a private road. McCuskey inquired about maintenance of the private road and how issues regarding maintenance would be handled. Barrett suggested the best option is to talk with the neighbors and to set up a joint agreement sharing the costs of the plowing. Barrett stated in his view an informal agreement might be the best option. Coleman requested clarification of Point 2 on page nine of Staffs report. Coleman inquired whether the grantee is considered the City. Gaffron stated the City is the grantee. Coleman inquired whether the homeowners association would need to get the approval of the City whenever they wanted to do something within the conservation easement Gaffron indicated the language “except as authorized by written consent of Grantee" does not require a public hearing, but that the City would review the item and detenninc whether approval should be given and whether any permits or public hearings are required. Gaffron stated in his view any modification to the agreement where it does not say “except as authorized by written con.sent of Grantee" would require a public hearing. Goodrum stated the nature trail is intended to be a natural trail and that they would prefer to construct whatever steps may be necessary out of timbers. White stated the City would prefer to keep the trail as natural as possible. McMillan inquired whether any other grading along the trail is currently planned. Goodrum stated they do not. Peterson inquired whether the bridge would be repaired. Goodrum indicated they would have to look at the bridge and find out what the DNR will allow them to do with the bridge as far as repairs. McMillan suggested the applicant consider clustering the boulevard trees rather than planting them every 40 feet in an effort to screen certain areas. McMillan .stated in her view the clustering of the trees would be more suitable for this neighborhood. McCuskey inquired whose responsibility it is to maintain the outlot. PAGE? MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, January 10,2005 7:00 o’clock p.m. (#04-3016 Wayzata Detlgn A Development, Continued) Galfion stated Tract G does need to be addressed in terms of maintenance. GafTron stated McCuskey may want to consider being an adjunct member or an associate member of the homeowners association. Gaffron noted that this is an unusual situation in that a property that is not located within the subdivision is being required to use the new private road. Peterson nmved, Sanscvcrc seconded, to direct Staff to -Iraft a resolution approving final plat for Application #04-3016, Henry Lazniarz/Wayzata Design A Development, 120 Brown Road South. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0 5. #04-3052 ERIC VOGSTROM, 2618 CASCO POINT ROAD-VARIANCES Eric Vogstrom, Applicant, was pre.sent. Sansevere indicated he is in support of the applicant’s revised plan, but that he would prefer the trees be replaced prior to any construction starting on this lot (Sansevere leaves at 8:10 p.m.) Gaf&on noted the applicant has rubmitted a revised plan to reflect a 1 ,499 square fool building footprint, removal of one parking stall, and a variance request to allow 31.7 percent hardcover within the 75’-250’ setback zone. Staff is recommending approval of the revised plan and the variance for 31.7 percent hardcover within the 75’-250’ setback zone. Gaflron stated the applicant has submitted a revised restoration plan, which is currently under review by Staff, noting that Staff is close to accepting it Gaf&on stated there may need to be some sort of development agreement that goes along with the restoration plan. Gaffron staled the Council has the option to direct Staff to draft a resolution reflecting Council’s action for adoption or to reject the current plan and again provide the applicant with guidance. McMillan inquired whether the garage is going to l)c a tuck-under garage. Vogstrom staled the room on the far right is not a bedroom and is actually a garage. Vogstrom indicated due to the program on his computer he was required to label that as a l>edroom rather than garage to arrive at the square footage. White noted this is a four-bedroom house. Peterson inquired whether the deck was counted twice in the hardcover calculation. Gaffron stated the deck consists of 150 square feet Peterson noted there are two decks depicted. Peterson inquired whether the City could delay issuing a building permit until the restoration plan has teen implemented and completed. s I « PAGE 8 i r * MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, January 10,2005 7:00 o ’clock p.m. (#04-3052 Eric Vogstrom, Continued) Barrett stated the issue is calculating the mnofT and that if the City is certain that the removal of the trees impacted runolT, the City could request the applicant provide or demonstrate to die City that he has enforceable agreements with the adjacent property owner requiring planting of the trees or an agreement with the City allowing them to obtain an injunction. Barrett stated that could be made a condition of the variance. Vogstrom noted he has already paid Essen for the trees that were removed. Gaflron staled the applicant is proposing to replace tlic trees and shrubs that were cut on the north side of the lagoon. GafTron stated the that were cut along the street side of the house consists of three rows of pine trees, with one row being totally within the property, one row being along the property line, and one row being within the right-of-way. Oafiron indicated that Staff would be reviewing Casco Point Road in the near future and that the road might need to be expanded slightly. GafEron stated it may make sense for all of the replacement trees to be located on the property rather than within the right-of-way. Gaflfron indicated Staff feels this is a reasonable plan and that Staff is close to accepting it. Gaftron stated the City Engineer would also be reviewing it. White inquired whether Mr. Essen is platming to replace the trees. Peterson inquired what type of trees are being proposed for along the road. Gaffron stated pine trees are being proposed in that area. Gaffron noted the trees located within the right-of-way that were removed were planted by a previous property owner. McMillan inquired whether the trees arc out of the 0-75’ zone. Gaffron stated they arc not located within the 0-75’ zone and that it is a reasonable request by the City to ask for replacement of the trees even though they are IcKatcd in the right-of-way. McMillan inquired whether homeowners are allowed to remove trees on their property. Gaffron stated property owners do have the right to remove trees on their property as long as they are not within the 0-75’ zone. Peterson inquired whether a drain tile system would be installed. Vogstrom staled a drain tile s) stem is part of the agreement he has vidth Essen and that gutters and .lownspouts would also be installed. Vogstrom indicated he is agreeable to putting something in writing if llic City requires it concerning the restoration plan but that he would prefer he be allowed to commence construction in the near future due to the interest he is incurring on his loan. PAGE 9 >i ■ MINUTES OF THE ORONO OTY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, January 10,2005 7:00 o’clock p.m. (1104-3052 Eric Vogstrum, Continued) White noted the trees cannot be planted during the wintertime and that if there is an enforceable agreement that the applicant will restore this property, he is in favor of the application. Peterson inquired whether the trees would need to be planted prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Gaffron stated that would be a logical and reasonable solution. Vogstrom stated he is willing to sign an agreement witli the city saying that tire pro|)crty would need to be restored prior to a certificate of occupancy being issued. Peterson inquired whether the City would require any guarantee on the longevity of the U^. Gaffron stated that could be included in a developer’s agreement. Barbara Essen, 20*8 Casco Point Road, inquired whether that would also encompass future property owners in the event the property is sold. Gaffron staled the agreement would encompass future property owners. Jeff Essen pointed out he received a citation from the city saying that he is subject to litigation if the trees are not replaced and that he has sent a letter to the City indicating he would replace the trees. lissen stated it was 90 days ago that the trees were cut down and that earlier this afternoon a settlement agreement was signed with VogsU^m and that the trees would be planted in the spring to replace the ones that were removed. Essen stated in their agreement gutters and downspouts are required, along with dram tile and a swale, but that there is no way for him to enforce that language. Essen requested that language be included in the development agreement to ensure that the City has the ability to enforce that agreement. Essen indicated this is the first time he has seer '.he revised plan and that one of his main areas of concerns is off-street parking. Essen slated he has always been in favor of granting additional hardcover to provide off-street parking and that he is .sup|)ortive of the two-car full-length driveway. Essen stated he is not supportive of the way the house has been twisted, noting that the deck looks down into their bedroom. lessen requested the deck be relocated to the other side to preserve their privacy. Peterson conunented it might be necessary to redesign the house if that change is made. Vogstrom stated he tried to take advantage of the best view of the lake in orienting the house on the lot. Peterson noted one of the decks is located off the master bedroom and one is located off tlie dining room. Peterson inquired which deck Essen would like re-oriented. PAGE 10 MINUTES OF THE ORONO aTY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, January 10,2005 7:00 o’clock p.in. (W4-30S2 Eric Vogttrom, Continned) Essen stated the upper deck would probably not be used for parties, but that in his view twisting the house has now given the applicant a clear view to his rcsidoicc. White inquired whether the house could be rotated slightly. Vogstrom stated he would prefer to look at the lake and not his neighbor’s house and that he will attempt to re-orient the house slightly to help preserve his neighbor’s privacy. Vogstrom stated he did locate the garage on that lot to take advantage of the best view of the lake. Vogstrom indicated he also would like to preserve his privacy. White inquired how far off the lot line the Essen residence is located. Jeff Essen stated their hou.se is located approximately 20 or 25 feet from the property line. Essen stated he also has been in favor of a variance on the hardcover, but the fact that the house is proposed IS feet closer to his property line and is larger than the current structure is the basis for his concerns regarding runoff. McMillan inquired whether the City has received a grading plan on this project. Gaflron stated the City has not received anything that could be considered a final grading plan and tliat it would be required at the time the building permit is applied for. Gaflron indicated the Council could require specific items relating to drainage. Vogstrom stated he did agree to the downspouts and gutters and that Essen has agreed to replace the shrubs and bushes in between the two homes to help with the privacy. Vogstrom indicated he would not be opposed to those two items being included in the development agreement. While moved to dircet Stall to prepare a resolution to accept the current revised plan submitted as part of Application #04-3052,2618 Casco Point Road, and to bring the resolution back for approval on January 24,2005, with the inclusion of a requirement for the installation of down spouts and grading plan. Moorse recommended at the time the Council approves the resolution on the 24"’, a signed agreement should be in place for the tree replacement. White amended his motion to include the condition that a signed agreement be submitted to the City concerning the tree replacement plan. McMillan seconded. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. PAGE 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, January 10,2005 7:00 o ’clock p.m. *6. WM-306S MARK AND BONNIE HECTOR, 3265 CARMAN ROAD - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 5274 White moved, Sanicvere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5274, a Resolution Granting Hardcover and Structural Coverage Variances for Mark and Bonnie Hector, 3265 Carman Road. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0 MAVOR/COUNCIL REPORT McMillan suggested the City have a process in place where a letter signed by the mayor and council members is sent to a resident that donates something to the City. Peterson stated the I^ng I.altc Fire Department and Orono Police Department did a great job on handling the fire at her neighbor ’s residence. PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR’S REPORT *7. REQUEST FOR PAYMENT til - CASCO COVE DRAINAfiE White moved, Sanscvcrc seconded, to approve Request for Payment No. 1, Casco Cove Storm Sewer Project to E.J. Mayers, Inc., In the amount of $18,040.50. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0 *8. REQUF^ST FOR FINAL PAYMENT - OLD LON<; LAKE ROAD SEWER White moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Request for Final Payment, Old I>ong Lake Road Sewer Project to E J. Mayers, Inc., in the amount of $2.517.60. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0 *9. HENNEPIN COUNTY EPDB CONDITIONAL USE LICENSE - RESOI .1JTION NO. 5275 White moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve RESOLUTION NO. 5275, a Resolution Authorizing the City of Orono to Extend an Agreement for the use of Hennepin County’s Electronic Proprietary Data Base. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0 * 10. CASCO POINT ROAD SURVEY White moved, Sansevere seconded, to authorize the surveying of Casco Point Road and Dunwoody Avenue for a future street reconstruction and drainage project, at a cost of $13,000, and to approve a budget adjustment in the Stormwater Fund to reBect this expenditure. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0 PAGE 12 f . MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, January 10,2005 7:00 o’clock p.m. *11. ACCEPT DONATION FOR LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS White moved, Sanicvcre seconded, to accept the donation of three decorative landscaping pots valued at $300 from NorUng Landscaping. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0 CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 12. ANNUAL APPOINTMENTS - RESOLUTION NO. 5276 Peterson moved. White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5276, a Resolution Designating Selected Appointments for the Year 2005. V01E: Ayes 3, Nays 0 13. SELECTION OP DATE FOR 2005 LOCAL BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION Moorse stated there is a new slate statute that requires at least one person on the local board to receive training on how the Board of Appeal operates. Moorse stated the training would have to be completed by December 2005, but that Staff is only aware of training being scheduled in February at this time. McMillan indicated she would be able to attend. McMillan moved, Peterson seconded, to establish Wednesday, April 20,2005, at 7:00 pjn. as the date and time for the 2005 Local Board of Appeal and Equalization meeting. VOTE: Ayes 3, NaysO *14. CITY RECORDER FEE ADJUSTMENT White moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the following fee schedule for 2005 for the City Recorder, effective January 1,2005. Length of Meeting 1 -2 hour meeting 2- 3 hour meeting 3- 4 hour meeting 4- 5 hour meeting 5- 6 hour meeting 6- 7 hour meeting 7- 8 hour meeting Proposed Fee Schedule $145.00 $170.00 $210.00 $275.00 $350.00 $455.00 $550.00 VOTE: Ayes4,NaysO PAGE 13 MINUTES OP THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Moaday, Jaaoary 10,2005 7:00 o’clock p.m. *15. PARK COMMISSION REAPPOINTMENT White laoved, Saasevere aecoaded, to rcappolat Ireae Silber to a tliree>year term on the Parks, Trails and Open Space Commission expiring on December 31,2007. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0 *16. RESIGNATION OF MATT BOLTERMAN, ON-SITE SEPTIC SYSTEM MANAGER White moved, Sansevcre seconded, to approve the resignation of Matt Bolterman effective January 18,2005. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0 *17. LIABILITY INSURANCE NON-WAIVER OP STATUTORY TORT LIMITS - RESOLUTION NO. 5277 White moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5277, a Resolntion Making a Selectioa not to Waive the Statutory Tort Limits for Liability Insurance Purposes. VOTE: Ayes 4 , NaysO *18. CITY INSURANCE AGENT FEE ADJUSTMENT White moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the insurance agent of record annual fee for service at S8,400, effective January 1,2005. VOTE: Ayes 4, NaysO *19. CONSULTANT ENGINEER 2005 FEE SCHEDULE White moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the rate schedule as proposed in a letter dated November 19,2004, from BRA for engineering services to be provided by BRA in 2005. VOTE; Ayes4,NaysO *20. ANIMAL CONTROL CONTRACT RENEWALS White moved, Saasevere seconded, to approve the renewal of the uBimul control contracts for 2005 with a 3 percent fee increase. VOTE: Ayes 4, NaysO CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT Barrett stated he had nothing to report. PAGE 14 i [ MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, Jannary 10,2005 7:00 o*clock p.m. *21. UCENSES ONE DAY GAMBLING - RESOLUTION NO. 5278 Girls Rugby Association of Minnesota/Orono Girls Rugby Team Rugby Field on Orono School Grounds Raffle with Home Game Fair and Family Day Fund Raiser May 11,2005,4:00 p.m. - 6:30 p.m. White anoved, Sansevcre seconded, to approve the above listed license. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0 *22. BILLS White moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve payment of the All Fnnds Account VOTE: Ayes 4, NaysO ADJOURNMENT Peterson moved, McMillan seconded, to adjonrn the Orono City Conncil meeting of Jannary 10,2005,at9:47p.m. VOTE: Ayes3,NaysO ATTEST: Lin S. Vce, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor PAGE 15 \ I" 8 C / !/ vv • .f- AGKNDA FOR COUNCII. MEKTING SET FOR MONDAY, J'^NUARY 24,2005,7:00 ORONO COUNCIE CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOPA (•) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion ‘ under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regnrdin.g each of the Agenda .terns are available m th. Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet. ROLL CALL ' CONSENT AGENDA I. Appiovc/Aiiicnd J A PPROVAI, OF MINUTES • 2. Regular Council Meeting of January 10. 2005 cniiM^n mcpting JAN 2 4 2005 CITY OP OHONO •M 3052 \ V /iy PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - JefTSoderstrom. Representative PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Dave Ralin, Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Pci Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT . c ua 3 W04-3016 Wayzata Design and Development, 120 Brown Road South - Final Subdivision Approval - Resolution , 4. #04-3022 pliil Skoog, 280 Tonka Avenue - Variance - Resolution 5. #04-3052 Eric Vogstrom. 2618 Casco Point Road-Variances-Resolution / 6. #05-3071 Anthony Thomas Homes, 400 Leaf Street - Variances-Resolution 7. #05-3076 Gregory and Jcaiuie Gustafson, 1280/1290 Spruce Place - Variance - Resolution MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR’S REPORT CITY ADMINISTRATORS REPORT v, on: n ^ 8. Navarre Fire Station - Change Order No. 2 and Request for Payment No. 9 (Final) 9. Dakota Rail Trail - Resolution X CITY AH ORNEY'S REPORT 10. LICENSES Kennel License Renewals Liipior License Special Event Pcmiit ' J Tobacco License Renewals V....> ♦ 11 BILLS l\ VJ O I J \ Frcliniiiiary Plat Approval Rcsol. No. 5204: 7-12-04 Prcniiiiiiary Plat Approval Expires: 7-12-05 S^CCTTIMQ JAN 2 4 2005 CITY OF OHU vO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Dale: January 21,2005 Item No. Department Approval: Name: MicliacI P GofTron Title: Planning Director Admiiilslralor Approval:Agenda Scclioii: Zoning Item Description: #04-3016 Henry LazniaivyWayzala Design & Development -120 Brown Road S. - Final Plat - Planned Residential Development (PRD) - RcsoKition Application Status: On January 10 Council reviewed various aspects of tlic final plat application, and reviewed the concerns expressed by the neigliboring property owners. Applicant provided revised plans on January 20 responding to the comments of the City Engineer as noted in his January 13 letter, and responding to the discussions of January 10. Staff lias reviewed tlie various legal documents with the applicant’s attorney and we are continuing to make minor revisions as this memo is being written. Presented for Council action is a Resolution for Final Plat Approval. Staff Recommendation: Approval of the attached Final Plat Approval Resolution, subject to satisfactoiy completion of all required submittals, plan.s, documents, payments, etc. prior to release of the plat and associated documents for filing. List of Exhibits A - Final Plat Resolution B - City Engineer Comments 1-13-05 C - Applicant’s Response 1-20-05 D - Private Road Request Fomi - “Creekside Trail E - Developers Agreement, Most Recent Drafi Engineering Plans Theappliciuit has submitted pUui revisions in res|X)iise to the comments and concerns of the City Engineer. We expect to have the City Engineer’s review and further comments for Monday’s meeting. It is staffs expectations that any additional engineering issues are relatively minor and can be worked out in a short time, such that staff is comfortable with Council approving the plat subject to staff and City Engineer approval of final plans before releasing the plat for filing. I»04-30I6 "Crccluidc in Oroiio** Januar)’ 21,2005 Page 2 Legal Documents SlafThas accepted tlie proposed language of llic various separate easement documents and the bylaws and incorporation documents of the homeowners association. Staff is still working with the applicant" attorney regarding the Developers Agreement and the Covenants. Noncofthc additional expected changes arc believed to require specific Council action or discussion. Road Name Tire applicant had proposed the road name “CrecksidcTrail". The Police Dqiartmcnt has pointed out that there is a Creekside Drive in Long Liikc, just north of Crecksidc In Orono, accessing off Watertown Road. The PD believes this could cause confusion and has rejected “Crecksidc Trail” or any other name with ‘creekside’. Tlic applicant has suggcstctl Creek Ritlge Trail which could be confused in an emergency with ourCreekwood frail in the N W corner of Orono. The PD would accept Creek Ridge if it’s not Trail or Drive (Road, Lane, Court, Path, Circle, etc. arc other options). While Creek-something has been used in many roads within the western suburbs, our goal is to create no more potential conflicting road names within Orono ’s emergency services)urisdiction, as we have enough ah eady (Kelly Avenue vs Kelley Parkway; Park Drive vs Park Lane vs Park Avenue; Crystal Bay Road vs Old Crystal Bay Road, etc.) As of this writing we arc awaiting word from the developer as to further road name options. Status of MCWD Permits The applicant has advised that the MCWD pemiits will be issued shortly. As of this writing I have not heard back from MCWD staff to confirm this, and have not received permits from the applicant. Resolution Tlic atfachetl resolution for Final Plat Approval incoqwratcs appropriate conditions ofqiproval, botli from the Preliminary Plat Approval resolution and from the prior Council discussions. Please review the Resolution to dctemiine whether any further revisions or additions arc necessar y. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolution for Final Plat Approval of CREEKSIDL IN ORONO, subject to satisfactory completion of all required submittals, plans, documents, payments, etc. prior to relea.scofthe plat and as.soeiatcd ilocuments for filing. Staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor, clerk and City stall" to execute the Developers Agreement once it has been approved by the City Attorney and Planning Director. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESI KD 1) Adopt or amend the attached lesolutiun. 2) Authorize the Mayor, clerk and City staff to execute the Developers Agi cement upon final language apjiroval by the City Attorney and Planning Director. I •/ A A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF CREEKSIDE IN ORONO .FILE«04-30I6 WHEREAS, the City ofOrono is a municipal conwration organized and ex isiing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hcreinancr “City Council”) has adopted subdivision and land development regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application by Creekside in Orono LLC (hcrcinaner the “Developer”) for subdivision ofproperty located at 120 Brown Road South and legally described as follows: Tract H, Registered Land Survey No. 352, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, on July 12,2004 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5204 granting Preliminary Plat Approval for the proposed development of a seven-lot Planned Residential Development (PRD) plat for single family residential purposes; and WHEREAS, the Developer has completed or has agreed to complete all other requirements of the platting regulations of the City including: 1. Completion of all platting requirements of Prcliminarj’ Plat Resolution No. 5204. 2. Submittal of a ‘record preliminary plat drawing’ incoqwrating all elements described in Conditions 1 and 2 of Resolution No. 5204. 3. Dedication on the plat of perimeter Drainage and Utility Easements and Drainage Easements as required in Resolution No. 5204. V Page 1 of 8 4. Designation and dedication on the plat of open water wetlands subject to City and other agency jurisdiction. 5. Provision to the City of a Flowagc and Conscrvalion Basement over all wetlands inOutlot A, incoiporating language for pre,servation of all uplands within Outlot A as well as witliin the west 50 feet of Lots I and 2, Creckside In Orono. 6. Submittal of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) pcmiit approving the grading, drainage and stomnvatcr management plan for development of the Property. 7. Provision to the City ofan underlying Road and Utilities Basement for the private road within Outlot B. 8. Provision to theCityofan underlying Road and Utilities E;isement for the private road witli Tract G. RLS 352. 9. Provision to the City of a Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, and Private Roadway Biisemcnt for the private road in Outlot B and Tract G, RLS 352, in lavor of Lots I through 7, Creeksitle In Orono. 1 0. Provision to the City of a signed and executed Developer's Agreement and letter of credit for approved site iniprovanaits including construction of the private road, .sewer ;uul water systems, .slonnwatcr and drainage systems and facilities, vegetation improvements, ete. 1 1 . Provision to the City of a title commitment as well as a title policy in the amount of $ 100,000 in (avor ol the City to ensure coverage ofall City interests as.sociated with filing ofthe subdivision and associated easements, etc., and certi (leil copies ofall reeoriled easements currently affecting the I'ropcrty. 1 2. Payment to the City of Stonnwater aiul Drainage Trunk Fc*c in the amount of $54,000.00 us established in Kesolulion No. 5204. 13. Payment to the City ofPark Dedication Fee in the amount of$33,300.00 as established in Re.solution No. 5204. 14. Pa>incnt to the City of final plat review fees and legal review and filing lees in the amount of $530.00 as established within Resolution No. 5204. Page 2 of 8 1 5. Pmvisioti to the City of final plans and specifications for impiovciucnts to the property inchuling construction of a private road, sanitary sewer system, water system and stormwater facilities, site grading, landscaping, etc. per the requirements of resolution No. 5204. 16. Provision to the City of a pemiit from 1 icnncpin('ounlyf(>rconstructionofthe private road access to Brown Road South. NOW/mKRKR)RK, BK IT RRSOCVRI) that based on the findingsol Resolution No. 5204, the City ('ouncil of the ('ity of Orono does hereby approve the Planticd Residential Development platoi CRhltKSlDP. IN ORONO, 1 lennepinC'ounly, Minnesota subject to the foIhrwingdcTlanitionsand conditions; I. 2. Sll«,>reland Status. In addition to the various development limitations cstahli.shal ha cin, I xits I through 7 arc within or pailially within thedesiguiited Shoreland Overlay District and subject to the C'ily of Orono .Shoreland regulations pertinent to tributaries. Lot Develop ment Standards. 1 ot development statulanls applicable to I .ots I through 7 are generally as shown on the appmved (Jnuling Drainage and Imsion Contix)! Plan. Sheet 4 of 6, by Schoell and Madson, Inc., revision dated 05-19-05 and attached hereto as P.XI IIMII__(which Plan shall be designated for reference purixoscs as the 'Record Preliminary Plat Drawing') and more .specifically as follows: All lots;Required Front Yard; 35' Required .Side Yard: 30' Required .Side .Street Yard: 35' Setback from Creek; 75' Setback from Delineated Wetlands: 35' Tliebank ofthe creek Ibrsetback purposes is cstahli.shal at thc936.5' elevation contour line. 5 “Required Yaid" designations shall he as depicteil on the ‘record preliminary plat tirawing' with the.standani ‘front yard abutting the piivate road, ‘si<lc yards' abutting .ulj.icent lots within the plat, 'rear yards' generally opposite the liont yards, but with the e.xceplions noted below Page 3 of 8 Tlic lot size for iidministcring accessory structure ordinances shall be Uic actual lot area and shall not credit any of the Conservation Outlet area. Additional Individual Lot Standards: Lot 1 : Tlie westerly 50' of Lot 1 is subject to a Conservation Easement allowing no structures or liardcovcr. The northerly yard of Lot 1 is designated as a side street yard. The rear yard 50' setback is coincident with the Conservation Easement boundary. Lot 2: Tlie westerly 50' of Lot 1 is subject to a Conservation Easement allowing no stnicturcs or hardcover. The westerly 50' yard of Lot 2 is designated asarcaryard for zoning purposes. Tlie westerly 50'setback is coincident with the Conservation Easement boundary. The southerly yard of Lot 2 shall also be treated as a rear yard, and shall be subject to a 50' rear yard setback and the *^5' creek setback. No accessory structures shall be placed within the 50' rear yards, nor within 75' of Uie creek. Lot 3: The existing house setback to Lot 3's northeasterly boundary shall be recognized as a legal nonconfomiity. However, any new construction within Lot 3 shall conform to the standards established herein. The southerly and southeasterly yards of Lot 3 shall be designated as rear yards, and shall be subject to a 50' rear yard setback and the 75' creek setback. No accessoiy stnicturcs shall be placed within the 50' rear yard, nor within 75' of the creek. 3. Lot 6: Tlicrc shall lx: no stnictural or hardcover encroachments of the stormwater pond casement or the 35' wetland buffers. Lot 7 : Tlicrc shall be no stnictural or hardcover encroachments of the stonnwater pond casement, of the 35' wetland buffers, nor of the 30' drainage and utility easement along the northwesterly boundary of Lot 7. Tree Preservation and Landscaping. The developer shall adhere to tlic approved tree preservation and landscaping plans. The developer shall walk the site witJi City staff prior to site grading to establish which, ifany, trees within the grading area can be saved or Page 4 of 8 Iransplantccl. 'I hc developer siiall confer with the property owner of 130 Brown Road South and withCitystaffto establish an alternate layout for spacing of boulevard trees along that adjoining property to provide a natural look rather than a regimented look. Developer shall follow the landscape plan general notes (upper lefi on Sheet 12 of 12), especially with regards to pmning and removal ofdead w(kxI and damaged branches within the Conservation Basement areas. 4. Conservation FuLsement Marking. Remiancnt markers of a design and material acceptable to the Planning Director shall be placed by the developer at all points where the Conservation linsement intersects a lot boundary or where the F.asemcnt boundary line changes direction, as stipulated in the Flowage and Conservation Basement. 5. Construction of Roads. I Itilitics and Site Improvements. Developershallconstnictthe private road within Outlet B and fract G, RIS 352, as well as sanitary sewer, water and stormsewer facilities in accordance with the Developers Agreement to be executed between the City and the Developer. 6. .Sa nitary Sewer and Water System s. All applicable City of l^ng Lake connection feesand charges associated with the sewer and water system serx'ing tlie development shall be paid to Long Lake by the Developer. Developer shall be responsible for any charges to theCity ofOrono from the City of Long I .ake in relation to the provision of municipal sewer Jind water from Long Lake. Upon completion by the Developer and acceptance by the City ofOrono, the sanitary sewer ami water facilities within Outlot B tutd within the 30' utility casement of Lot 7, shall btx'ome p.irt of the City ofOrono utility system, to Iw opr’rated and maintained by the City ofOrono. As part of the installation of sanitary sewer and water improvements per the approved pkms, r>evelo|K*r shall install two sewer and two water stubs for future service to the Dumi property and I sewer and I water stub for future serv • to the McCuskey properly. 7. Road Name. 1'he name of the private read shall be__________, Rage 5 of S' 8. Grading anti Drainajic Requirements. General site grading shall Ik; in eonfonnance with the approved Grading, Drainage and Erosion Conlrol Plan, subject to the recommendations of the City Engineer in his letter dated January 13,2005.. During development within individual lots, wherever feasible, individual driveways shall be graded to drain towai d the road stonn sewer system. Wherever feasible, individual yard areas shall be graded to drain toward the road stomi sewer system. Wherever feasible, roof gutter systems shall be installed to discharge roof runoff so that it will drain toward the road storm sewer system. 9. Siunaue and Lighting. No street lightingor development identification signage has been approved for Creekside In Orono. Any such proposed ligliting or signage shall be subject to prior City approval, which may require pubtie hearings. 10. City Engineer Approval. Approval of all improvanents is subject to recommendations of City Engineer Thomas Kellogg as noted in his comments dated January 13, 2005. 51 • Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Approval. Tliis subdivision approval is subject to MCWD approvals andpennits as required. The final plat shall not be released for filing until the Developer has provided evidence that all required MCWD pennits have been obtained. 12. Developcra Agreement. The plat shall not be released for filing until the Developer has exeeuted a Developer’s Agreement per the conditions of Resolution No. 5204, including a letter of credit written to 150% of the cost oftheproposc*dsite improvements, including any required landscaping. 13. Site Improvements: BuildimiPennit Issuance . No land alterations shall take place until erosion conlrol is establi.shed and the City Engineer has approved all final improvement plans. No buildingpcmiils will be issued until alldnunagc Hicilitiesiuid improvements have been installed and .satisfactory road base (including road base and the initial lift of bituminous) has been installed. 14. The City Clerk shall release the plat documents fur filing only u|X)n ceili fication by the City Attorney and Planning Director that all requirements of the platting regulations have been satisfied. Page Oof 8 15. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City ofOrono witli the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles Office on or before July 24,2005 together with a certified original copy of this resolution and executed copies of the easements and covenants pertinent thereto. '1 The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the conditions of this Resolution have not been met or the plat has not been filed by the date sped fied above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of Orono this 24th day of January, 2005. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Page 7 of 8 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this___day of .2005 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of ^2005 by Linda S. Ve., City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 8 of 8 ----- - --J CREEKSIDE IN ORONO RT DOC. NO. KMO» Ml ey IHtSl PWMHIS OMiM* in Oron*. UC. o Minn.i«lo l*na«<) linMIly compony. It* <wnw and Cdnabucllon H»l«o,d C.. . I«nn.»la e«.po..iion. nMyl9a4«t. dl lha M..in« daiffcoJ p.opd.ty .ilualad in Ih. County of HMOopin. SloU of Minnotolo. lo mV TrocI M, RCOSTtWO lAHO SUHt«T NO 3S7. Monnopin County. MinnoMlo HOM COMOda MM «»d «d bd ducMydd and pMlIdd dd CRtCdSOC m ORWO. »«1 do., nordb, dondit dod dMkCdld Id (hd mdlMc tar Mdidic dtd IdrdMT Ihd ddMmdnI. dt RMnn on Ihid ptal lor droMOMd dnd ulfcl, porpoMt only in taindt. -M.d.1 Mid CrdddMta in Orond. UC l.d. louMd lIMM pr..dnl. I. bd R«n*d b, lit P-opd, dll^dr Ihi. , - - doy of_____________—--------------------------- SJCMCO Oooktido in Orono. ICC ORONO. MMNCSOTA » „.«..«-- .......... =-~- •' - »> •' ■"rjrjT prowidod by Hbwooolo Stolwloo. Soction 50S 03. SubdWtion 2 OTV COUNOL Of n€ OVf or ONONO STAfC or IIPMtSOTA COUNTY or________ 20 _______fbo forogobio fc>*lrumont «M ocbnootodgod boloro mo lh»t----------------------<foy of--------------------- ____________________________of C/OOhtldo in Orono. LLC. O Ninnoooto limiltd lioblUY compony. on boNelf of Ibo compony Notory f*ubNc.____________Count^^ MinnoMlo My CommioMon tipWoo Jonuory 31. 200b In .tnd» —ddl Mid Cdn.lnKlldn Hd.l9<>«< '"•«•<>'• Cd. d U-n.Mlo to<pd.dlidn hot cduMd IddM prd.dnlt Id bd . by ilt proper offaor \hi%_________doy ol---------------- 20 ---- 90NC0: Conotuclion Moriqopo imioflofi Ca. By---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- STATC or mpincsota COUNTY or-------------- fho foropoin^ h*ot#umonl oot odmoolodgo boforo mo lhio---------------Boy of----------------------20»_ by------------------------------ ____________*1. ConvtnictSon Mortpopo ln«oilor» Co., o MrmtMlo corporoUon on boholf of Iho eorporolion By TAKPAVCR 5£«\«C£S OCPARIMCNT Monnoptn County. MinntOOtO ___Oor% I bMMy Cdrlil, Ihdl Id.., PdMbta In 20 ----------d-d P^dr yddr. -dM bdr. paid tar ta-d d.«r*,M «n IH. plol Odl«l tai. __________doy of____________________________^------------- PoUicii M. O'Connor. Horw»opin C«»#nty Auditor SURVCY DIVISION Honnopin County. INnnoftoto By________________________________________Oopoly Purou^t to Mbm STAI Soc. 3836 505 (»M9). Ihit piol ho* boon oppromd lh.f .. _____________________ 20 _______ Boy of IMUom P. Brom». Monnopin Cm-nty SurooiN^By--------------------- NotN^ PubBe,__________County. Mwnotolo My Commiooion Ciplrto Jonoory 31. 2005 t hor*y eofWly thol I hoo# ourooyod ond piottod Iho propofty doocfMod on thit plot e« CBttiCSttt IN ONONO; thol th»o plot lo o eorroct roprooonlotion of oefd turvoy thot ol Moloncoo oro corroctly thcHm on Iho plot in fool ond hundrodih. of o thot Ml monumontt htNO boon corrocUy plocod M Ih. pround Ot ohoon on Iho plot or o« bo p>ocod ot r«y,*od by Ibo locM pc^ommontM uMl; thot Iho ootiidt boundory Nnoo oro corrocUy dooipnotod on Iho plot; ond Ihot thoro oro no pubic hiM*«oyt to bo doMpnolod on Iho plot REGismAB or btus . Honnopm County. Mtanooolo I horoby eortify thot Iho Mlhin plot of CftC£KSOC M 060N0 ooo »od in IWt offieo Ihio __________________20 _________ ot_____________o'ctoel -------------M MkhoM N Cunntir. NopMIror of Titlot ___ Boy of Oopuly 0«*ioi C NicIMo. tond Sunroyor Unnoooto Uconto No. 19839 STATt or MPNCSOTA county or mcnncpw INo loropoo*p ourroyor'i corl»f»colt 000 oebnoModpod boforo mo lh*i 20 _______ by OoniM C NiebMt. Lond Surwyor By------------------------------------------------------------- Notory Pubic. Monnopin County Mtnooooto My Comnuoawn Cipiroo--------------------------- doy of SCHOELL 8 MADSON, INC. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS SOIL TESTING • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES SHEET 1 or 2 SHEETS Jan 13 2005 10:02 B0NE3TR00 ROSENE RNDERLiK 6516361311 p. 1 ^ i Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects ?r.v, WifSi HighWHy 36 - St P.iul. MN ‘jSlia Office: 65l-636-'>600 • Fax: 651*636*1311 wwwhonestroo.com January 13, 2005 Mike GafTron Planning Director City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Creeksidc File No. 1394)5-000 Plat No. 04-3016 Dear Mike: We have reviewed the revised utility, street, grading, drainage and erosion control plans dated 1-3-05 for the proposed seven tot Creeksidc subdivision. The site is located ea.st of South Brown Road, .soulli of Long Lake and north of the Luce Line trail in the northeast cjuarlcr of Section 3. We have the following comments in regards to engineering matters. 1. Acccss/SCreets: A geotechnical rcjxjrl, R-valuc recommendation and pavement design should be submitted for review and approval. The proposed trail between Lois 2 and 3 shows proposed grades in excess of 40%. These proposed grades are not only a safety concern but are likely to be an erosion concern. The proposed wood chip surfacing will likely end up in the creek after a rain event. Tlie trait plan should be revised to reduce the grades and implement permanent erosion control measures. 2. Grading and Erosion Control: The plans have been rcvi.scd so that all lots will be custom graded at the time the home is constructed. This will present a problem with respect to drainage and construction issues. It is likely that home construction will begin and be completed at different times on each of the lots. We previously recommended that the sites be graded with side yard swales centered on the lot lines to convey storm water to the rear of the lots to the extent possible. Tliis will be difficult to accomplish if each lot is graded independently from the others. We would strongly ircommcnd that the city encourage the applicant to grade all building sites now rather than in a piecemeal fashion. Thi.s will require submitting a revised grading plan for review and approval. We feel this will go a long way in minimizing drainage issues and reducing the inick iraffic during home construction. Once the site is graded the applicant should provide an overall as-built grading survey to the city for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits. Wc further recommend that an as-built grading survey for each lot be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of o certificate of occupancy. This would scrv'c as a check to verify that the drainage was not altered during the home construction or final lot grading. The survey should include contours that extend at least 50-fect beyond all lot lines. We recommend that the westerly portions of Lots 1 and 2 be graded to drain southerly to the creek. This grading should be done prior to the proposed tree installation. 3. Drainage: Please sec the attached comments from Lance Hoff regarding drainage issues. 4. Financial Guarantee: Wc hove estimated the cost for site improvements to be $307,465 and have attached a copy of the estimate to this report. The applicant should provide a financial guarantee for 150% of this amount or $461,198 to the city prior to any work on site. The financial guarantee can be reduced periodically as work is completed and accepted but should never be reduced below $20,000 uniil all work is completed and accepted. . f V • St. Pciul. St. Cloud, Rocheiler, Wlflmar. MN • Milwaukee. Wl • Chicago. **L Action/E^«i OMportunily Employer «nd rmplrty#*r Owvn^.1 Jan 13 200£i 10i03 BONESTROO ROSENE RNDERLIK 65163B1311 P-2 If you have any questions please call me at (651) 604-4863. Yours very truly, BONnSTROO, ROSEHO, ANDORLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. /<r^/ Tom Kellogg Cc; Greg Gappa, City of Orono ft ‘ ' i Jan 13 aOQS 10s03 BONESTRQO R03ENE fiNlOERLlK SS1S361311 p. 3 City of Orono Creekside In Orono Plat No. 04-3016 site Improvement Cost ^UfTiate Item Unit Est. Quantity Unit Price Eut. Cost Mobilization Site Grading Common Excavation Aggregate Base, Class 5 Aggregate Base, Class 4 Type 31 Bituminous Type 41 Bituminous Surmountable Curb and Gutter B018 Curb and Gutter Residential Concrete Driveway 6" DIP, Cl. 52 6” Gate Valve and Box Hydrant Curb stop and box 1 inch type K copper wator service Connect to Existing Watermain 12 ’ RCP 15" RCP 18" RCP 8" PVC Storm 8* FES w/ Trash Guard 12* FES 15* FES 18* FES w/Trash Guard Rip Rap w/ Filter Blanket Remove Existing 16* CMP Outlet Control Structure Storm Manhole w/ R-1642 Casting Catch Basin Manhole w/ R-3007 Casting Double Catch Basin Manhole w/ R-3067 Cast. 0" PVC, SDR 35 Sanitary Sanitary Manhole w/ R-1642 Casting ianllary Manhole Overdepth Connect to Existing Sanitary Sewer Restoration including trees Silt Fence Estimated Construction Cost r 50% Security Deposit Totml Seeurity Deposit Required LS LS CY TN TN TN TN LF LF SY LF EA EA EA LF EA LF LF LF LF EA EA EA EA CY LS EA EA EA EA LF EA LF EA LS LF 1 1 5,540 1,382 1,382 412 206 986 716 17 1,148 6 3 7 350 1 12 244 14 17 1 1 2 1 17 1 1 1 2 1 928 7 42 1 1 2,000 $5,000 40,000 5 12 12 40 45 10 11 36 2? 600 1.500 150 10 1,000 25 30 35 20 150 400 500 600 50 500 2.500 ‘,500 1.500 1,500 27 1,700 100 1,000 50,000 3 $5,000 40,000 27,700 16,579 16,579 16,480 9.274 9,860 7,876 612 25,256 3,600 4.500 1,060 3.500 1,000 300 7,320 400 340 150 400 1,000 600 830 500 2.500 1.500 3.000 1,500 25,064 11,900 4,200 1.000 50,000 6,000 $307,465 $153,733 $461,19B J Jan 13 SOOS 10:03 BOMESTRQO ROSENE RNDERLIK 6516361311 P.‘t Memo Pi'ojoct Name: Creekside in Orono To: Mike Gaffron, Tom Kellogg i^Bofiesiroo SM noMrur Asfocidtef ximnai Client: The City of Oiono File Mo: 139-04-000 From: Lance Hoff Data: 1-12-05 Re: Drainage Review fff.aiBa Development: Creekside in Orono Doveloper: Creekside in Orono, LLC Engineer: Schoell and Madson, MPLS Submittal: Plans, Response to Comments Plan Sheets; Grading and Drainage, Erosion Control, Standard Details, Utilities, SWPPP Date of Plans: 12-03-04, latest revision on 1-03-05 Date Received: 1-11-05 Summary of Recommendationa Based on our review of the Creeksido In Orono development, we offer the following comments. Details on each recommendation are included in the following section of this memo. For ease of reference, the numbers of the recommendations listed below match the numbers of their detailed explanations, listed In the following section. 1. All off-site drainage should be included in the drainage calculations. 2. The EOF from the road should bo dosignod to meet freeboard roquiremonts and clearly labeled on the plans. 3. The EOF from the road should be designed to avoid paralleling the storm sewer as much as feasible. 4. An EOF should be provided from the pond to the wetland. 5. The pond and infiltration basin berms should be raised to contain tho 100-yr storm. SoftMlroo, Rommnm, Andtrtlk and Aaaoclataa, tnc. OSLMutOmBa: 21M Wmi >«ghw«y M SI. Paul. MN sails Pinna: Bai.a3a-4aoo i-u eai4M 1311 a MNwauliM Offle«: 1816 Wo»t MM)uon RomI M»quon. Wt &3062 Phona 262-241-4406 l-M. 202 241-4901 □ RoQhMttr Offica: 112 7*5lfMtNE RochMltf. MN 65906 507-20? 2100 r»i. S07-282 3100 U WiiifviAr Offica: 208 501 8Um1 8W Wilrnar. MN 5020^ Phons 320-214-9657 f mu: 32O-214-O450 www.eonealPDo.cont U 8t Cluud Oino«: 3721 23** Btrw9t G SI Oovd. MN 66301 PhOTHi 320 251 4553 fmiL 320-251-6252 oarmymmkmorno^: 666 8#Nal f Road CkvyalMcs. it 00030 Phona 047-546-6774 Fm S47-S46-6079 SchoelE &. Madson, Inc Engineering • Surveying • Planning Soil Testing • Environmental Services WWW snhoeilmndson . com January 20,2005 Mr. Tom Kellogg Uoncstioo, Koscnc, Anclcrlik & Associates 2335 West Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 Subject:Response to Comments Hated January 13, 2005 Creckside in Orono, SMI Job No. 64096-001 Hear Mr. Kellogg: Following arc the re.sponscs to the comments given in the January 13, 2005 staff report: 1.The gcoteclinical repoil is included. The pavement .section is from the Orono Standard Details, City Plate No. STR-5. After di.scussions with the City Council the trail location is unchanged. The trail has been revised to be a natural base trail where erosion may occur. 2.The grading plan has been revised to show grading in all of the lots. We discussed with Mike (lalfron the grading of the westerly portions of I.ots 1 and 2 to drain southerly to the creek. He does nut want to mass grade this area but would rather grade the area to provide drainage to the creek with niininial disturbance. A note iias been added to the grading plan. 3. 'I'hc following arc the rcsponse.s to the comments from Lance Hoff: 1.The additional runoff has been added as recommended to the storm sewer and pond design and the storm .sewer and ponds have been revised. 2. 'I'lic HOF elevation of 950.4 from the road has been added to the plans. 3.The !•( )F from the road has been offset from the storm sewer 4.The HOF' elevation of 941.2 from the pond to the wetland has been added to the plans. 5.riic pond and infiltration berms have been raised to be 1 ’ above the lOO-yr .stonn. The pond berm has been lai.sed to an elevation of 942 2 and the inriltration berm has been niiseil to 939.3 AffirmatiM Aotion Equal Opportunity Employor irViflri Wiwntjx Ftniilnviirrl Ruito 1 • Minno.'ioolin MN fifinnS-l fiPfi L_ 6. The pond depth has been maximized with a bottom elevation of 932. 7.A pond access has been added along the north side with gradual slopes to the pond, lire pond is under a public drainage and utility easement. 4. The financial guarantee is the responsibility of the owner. Please call me at 952-847-9643 with any comments or questions. Sincerely, SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. C. 0iJUu^ Paul C. Wallick, P.E. CC:Henry Lazniarz, 1 117 Marquette Avenue S., Suite 2509, Minneapolis, MN 55403 • I ^ “j n ' jir Znf>V.HtMH tJ (iiunnuDun UT CUUi? CC‘.*jUit FfGi‘-'ilVi* Or O’C^IOw^W ciTV or oiuiiin y PRIVATE XfJAWAV RK'^UCST tjr/i4j*;,( ;.JJJ f C0*>/»« f-tu Cotilfsl 1(0, 0*-f " S^tf.. I A. X . % The .%’iljj**nt cf chlu rtqvicsb in: , an existf.nK private rand ’^ny. 0 prepoied private rcsOway whlr.li to bo created aa a crinOttlon nf panding aubiiivlaion approval. B. TM oVnat(v) of chi3 Ptivatt* Roadway and/or a ’I iSurfln^ ptoport7 win bo fart) chft cA.naov(a) of th« foLlnwirj; dwecclbr.d preptrty: C.tha obovo nvnat(s) heraby raqvjwac chat iMr Private Ruodwjy he Hnewn by etit following n.ifr.a; Choice Ho, 1 .Choice Mo. 2 LAKiF. Choice Ho. 3 gggil^/e/ig 2P/2.//>Hg t>, ■ (Lfee three choicna in order of preference, TKt City Covn-rll vin approve a netiQ provided no eonlltcc cxl^la with axUclnA OAne« or waevlng policy, 1.1 ill nomoe hovo a cont\lcC| y^xi will he ashed to naWa naw choices. Th« approved J3as»*i will hi usee! fot all inalling eddrasj and official idcnclficocloa purposea,) 7ha gbavt oamexfP) Hatoby ciqiioab the City of.Orono to install tha iollooflrg atanderd atreat and rrafflc lignj and ad id ownot(a) hoteby dgrpc tu fMnbufee the City foe all costs of aaid Inscallaiion, (Sich signing (uy ba required oa part oC a separata Deviloprr's agrecnenr and/or 0ubdlvlclof\ request.) atandsrd city axroet name ltj(3i(a) • niinbcc rtquliod ^ / __standard *'STOl»‘* aign(o) - nuodiar raqulrad / . atandard trafflo alRn(s) dtacrifiid below; . . . - number reqclrod Tha abova ownor(s) do hafehy mcVcnnylcdgc tha (lun»ta) e*lsttn(;fl of said pflvaca road, and that the City of Otono hot no oblif^atlnn to lialntaln or aervlce aoid private road, ond that the City of Ornno docs not intend to otqulra ov open said private told a a public ro^du.iy. Signatuyifa} of/tqwner(ajfi Dace D<it« ; r ^ in CITY OF ORONO IIKNNF.IMN COUNTY, MINNESOTA DEVELOPER’S AGREEMENT FOR CREEKSIDE IN ORONO BY CREEKSIDE IN ORONO, LLC THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of January, 2005, by and between the City of Orono, a municipal corporation orj^^ani/ed under the laws of the Stale of Minnesota (licreinaner called “City"), and Creekside In Orono, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, its heirs, organized under the laws of the successors aiul assigns, (hereinancr called “Developer"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer has made application to the City Council for approval of the final plat of Creekside in Orono. AND, WHEREAS, the (’ity Council has granted approval for such development on the condition that the Developer enter into this agreement to provide for the in.stallation of improvements hereinafter de.scribed on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual promises and conditions hereinafter contained, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1 • frotierty jjeseription: Lots 1 -7, Block I, Outlot A, Outlot B, Creekside in Orono, according to the recorded |)lat thereof. 2. Improvements: In accordance with the policies and ordinances of the City, the following describetl public or private improvements (hereinafter collectively called the “Improvements") .shall be constructed and installed on the terms and conditions hereinafter contained: See Exhibit A allached hereto and made a part hereof. Page I of 5 Initials of Developer Initials of (’ity (’lerk 3. Construction Plans: Tlie following described detailed plans and specifications for the complete installation of the Iniproven.cnts shall be submitted by the Developer for the approval of the City prior to the start of construction. The Plans and specifications shall conform to all current City standards for all applicable work. The detailed plans and specifications for complete installation are as follows: 4. Construction of Improvements: a.Commencement Date -The construction of Improvements shall begin no later than _____________________. No land alterations can lake place until erosion control is established and the City is in receipt of a final grading and road plan. In addition, no linpruvenicnls can begin until the City IZugincer of Orono has approved all Improvement plans. b. Completion Date - All Improvements shall be completed no later than Page 2 of 5 Initials of Developer Initials of City Clerk r c. Coiilractors -The Developer sliall select, retain anti supervise the Contractor(s) responsible for Improvement construction. The City reserves the right to require satisfactory proof of successful experience and adequate financial status of any such contractor. Where required by City ordinance, the contractor shall first obtain a liccn.se from the City. d. I’reConstruction Conference -Prior to the start of any construction, the Developer and the Developer ’s Contractor shall meet with the responsible City official to review construction plans and schedules. e. Permits -Prior to the start of any construction, the Developer ’s Contractor shall apply for and receive all necessary permits from the City and/or government agencies having juri.sdiction. No building pcmiits will be issued until all drainage facilities and drainage improvements have been installed and a satisfactory road base, including the first bituminous layer, has been installed. f. Construction -The construction, installation and materials shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City. g. Insurance -The Developer will cause each person who constructs and installs any Improvement to maintain complete insurance coverage including Worker ’s Compensation, I.iability and Property Damage. 5- l*erl’oniia nce Deposit : For the purposes of assuring to the City that the Improvements will be completed according to the terms of this agreement, and that the Developer will pay all claims for work done and materials and supplies furnished, the Developer has deposited with the City at the time of the execution of this agreement an irrevocable letter of credit in a fomi satisfactory to the City providing that the City is able to draw upon such letter of credit in its sole discretion to complete the Improvements if the Developer fails to satisfactorily complete the work prior to the completion date specified in Section 4 above. The amount of such deposit shall not be reduced before substantial completion of the Improvements, fhe letter of credit shall expire no .sooner than six months aP.er the completion date .specified in Section 4 above, or no sooner than_ ___________________whichever is later. b. Fees and Hxpenses: The Developer agrees to pay all City fees required per the current City Fee Schedule and further agrees to completely reimburse the City for all the variable additional expenses i; incurs in regard to the review and approval of the Improvements including, hut not limited to, direct City payroll and overhead, costs, and fees paid to consultants and other professionals. 7. Resolutions of City. Developer agrees to be bound by the provisions set forth in all re.solutions of the City Council approving the Development. 8. I^rminalion: This Agreement shall be terminated upon the completion of all Improvements set forth in this Agreement. Page 3 of 5 *1 Initials of Developer Initials of City Clerk j .1 9. Binding Rflcct: The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto and shall be binding deemed covenants running witli the land. References herein to Developer, if there be more than one, shall mean each and all of them. This agreement to be executed by the Developer, shall be placed of record so as to give notice hereof to subsequent purchasers and encumbrancers of ail or any part of the subdivision and all recording fees, if any, shall be paid by the Developer. 10. Notices: Whenever in this agreement it shall be required or permitted that notice or demand be given or served by cither party to this agreement to or on the other parly, such notice or demand shall be delivered personally or mailed by United States certified mail (return receipt requested) to the addresses set forth below. Such notice or demand shall be deemed timely given when delivered personally or when deposited in the mail in accordance with the above. Notice to City Notice to Developer City of Orono Clerk/Administrator P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Creekside in Orono, LLC Attn: Henry Lazniant 1 117 Marquette Avenue Suite 2509 Minneapolis, MN 55403 II. In corporation bv Reference : All plans, special provisions, proposals, specifications and contracts for the Improvements furnished and let pursuant to this agreement shall be and hereby are made a part of this agreement by reference as fully us if set out herein in full. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Subdivider have caused this agreement to be duly executed on the day and year first above written. CITY OF ORONO: By:By: (Mayor)(City Clerk) Page 4 of 5 Initials of Developer Initials of City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 2005 by_________________________ &________________ day of January, ____, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public DEVELOPER: CREEKSTDE OF ORONO, LLC By: Henry Lazniarz It.H: Chief Manager/President STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of January, 2005, before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared Henry Lazniarz, as Chief Manager/President of Creekside In Orono, LLC, and said instrument was executed on behalf of the Company. Notary Public Reviewed for Administration: Date:By:. (City Official) This document has been drafied by: Blustin & Associates, PLLC 5775 Wayzata Boulevard Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Page 5 of 5 Initials of Developer Initials of City Clerk L Dale Application Rcccivccl: 05-13-04 Dale Applicalioii Considered as Complete: 10-26-04 Review Period Expires: 02-25-05 COMMrii MrcTf^JG J^iiN ?. 4 2005 REQUEST FOR COUNOL ACTION ciiy OH ohono Date: January 20,2005 Ftem No. V Department Approval: Name: Melanie CurtiAMM Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: Title: City Planner Item Description: #04-3022 - Phil & Karen Skoog - 280 Tonka Avenue - Variance - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IA, One Family Lakcshorc Rcsiclcnlial, 2 acres/200 ’ width Lot Area: 0.54 acre (23,809 s.f.) List or Exhibits: A - Resolution per Planning Commission recommendation B - PC Action Notice dated 01-20-05 C - PC Memo & Exhibits ofOl-04-05 Application Summary: The applicants are requesting renewal of variances granted in 2000 for a rear yard setback variance in order to construct a dining room addition to the existing home 43.9’ from the rear lot line where 50 is required. The applicants have agreed to remove all plastic and fabric liners from landscape beds eliminating the need for a 500 ’- 1000 ’ zone hardcover variance. Planning Commission Recommendation On January 18,2005, Planning Commission voted 6-0 on the consent agenda to recommend approval of the rear yard setback variance. Planning Stall Recommendation Approval of the variances per the attached Resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt or amend the attached Resolution. ■ Ibwv i.Ma* A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-305 SUBDIVISION B FILE NO. 04-3022 WHEREAS, Philip A. Skoog and Karen S. Skoog, husband and wile (hereinafter “the applicants ”) are the owners of the property located at 280 Tonka Avenue within the City of Orono (hereinafter the “City”) and legally described as follows; Lots 9 and 10, Block 2, Lot 18, Block 5, BAYSIDE ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETONKA, and that part of Hill Street vacated which lies between the southerly extensions of the East and West lines of said Lot 9, Hennepin County, Miiuiesota (hereinafter the “property”); and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal 2^ning Code Section 78-305 Subdivision B to allow construction of a 13.5 ’ x 14’ dining room addition 43.9’ from the rear property line where a 50 ’ setback is normally required. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #04-3022. 2. The property is located in the LR-IA, One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District which requires a minimum lot area of 2 acres and a minimum lot width of 200’. 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on January 18, 2005 and recommended approval of tlv rear yard setback variance based on the following findings: a. The applicants ’ property is 0.54 acres in area and has 190’ of width at Tonka Avenue. Page 1 of5 b. The property is similar in size to the other lots in the immediate area. c. Tlie applicants ’ property is nearly conforming in width. With the amount of square footage (23,809 s.f.) the depth is disproportionate to the width making it difficult to meet the rear yard setback with a reasonably sized addition. d. There is no additional land available for acquisition by the applicants to make the property conforming. e. The proposal will not have a negative impact on light, air or open space within the neighborhood. f. The proposed addition is not out of character for the immediate neighborhood. 4. Tlie City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, .safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is neces.sary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, OKDKR AND CONDI I IONS Based upon one or moie of the above findings, the Orono C'ity Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305 Subdivision B to illow construction of a dining room addition 43.9 ’ lioin the rear property line where a 50 ’ setback is normally required, subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 5 1. Council approval is based on the situ plan submitted by the applicant and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan which are not in conformity with City codes will require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2. Hardcover in the 250 ’- 500 ’ zone shall not increase above the level of 4,090 s.f or 30%. Hardcover in the 500 ’-1000’ zone shall be limited to 3,561 s.f. or 35%. Applicants arc advised that any future requests to increase hardcover above tiie allowed limits or change the nature of cxisting/approved hardcover shall require City approval, and increases in hardcover will not likely be approved witiiout concurrent reduction in existing hardcover. 3. ApplicanLs shall remove all plastic or fabric liner material from the decorative landscape beds on the property to ensure their permeability as non-hardcover surfaces. 4. Required removals of structure and hardcover shall be completed by the footing inspection for the dining room addition. 5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (January 24, 2006). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. 'I’he undersigned applicants have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of the applicants and the ap|)licants’ heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 24"* day of January, 2005. Page 3 of 5 ATTEST: Linda S. Vec, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24'*’ day of January, 2005 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, u Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of _______, 2005 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Tliis instrument was acknowledged before me this__day of by Karen S. Skoog, wife of Philip A. Skoog. ,2005 Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUN TY OF HENNEPIN This instrument was acknowledged before me this__day of by Pliilip A. Skoog, husband of Karen S. Skoog. .2005 Notary Public Page 5 of 5 A WOOD BOROCR (TYP) • • •• • . ./'■iv-? GRAVEL DRIVEWAY EXISTING HOUSE y #280-'^ i POOL EOUPMCNT (-JI' I : iil.L.C'r) I ...500’ SETBACK LINE FROM CREEK 18 500’ SETBACK LIME FROM S’UBBS BAv i N asaBay ■ I I f;XKie>ir 0 CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway POB0X66 Crystal Bay, MIS 55323 952.249.4600 ZONING FILE 04<3022 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: January 20,2005 TO: P*’.il A Karen Skoog 280 Tonka Ave Long Lake, MN 55356 COPIES: TYPE OF REQUEST: Variance DATE OF MEETING: January 1 8,2005 Planning Commission recommended as follows: To approve rear yard setback variance for a kitchen addition with the condition that all the plastic and fabric liners are removed from all landscape areas. VOTE:6 FOR 0 AGAINST If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they arc available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. If you have questions, please call City Planner, Melanie Curtis at 952.249.4627. tixniuii u IIIV. W04 io;>? 4 .liinunry ?OOTj 1 of 4 Dull* Applicalioii HtH'Hvril: 05-I.1-04 n»(t i us C IO-26>U4 Rrvic'W IVriiMl K x|mios : 02-2S-0.S 1'o:Chair Ralm aiul IMannin^ Commission Members Ron Moorsc, C’ily Administratoi- I'rotti: Date: Subject: Melanie Curlis, (!ily Planner January 4, 2005 04-3022,1’hil A Karen Skooj;, 2X0 'I'onka Aveiuic, - Renewal Variances - public bearing /oiling Dislriel: Lot Area: I.K-I A, Single Family I.akesliorc Residential, 2 acres/200’ 0.54 acre (23,809 a.l.) Application Summary: Tbi.s applicalion wa.s bcibre you al your November meeling. Al tb.'il (inie llie applicants were unaware that the location shown on the survey was not tlie location that they Ikk I piopo.sed, as they did imt review the survey prior to submittal. Ihey have now .submitted a revised survey, which they have reviewed, and wi.sh to amend their November appioval to lellect the changes. H.s.scntially, the applicants are letpiesting renewal of variances granted in 2000 for a rear yard setback variance in order to construct a dining room addition to the e.xi.sting, home. Additionally, a 500 ’- 1000’ /.one haulcover variance is reipiired based on new inrormation, unless the plastic liner is removed from the huulscape beds. Staff Rccuinmcailation: IMamimg I )epaitmeiit Staff recommends approval of the rear yanl setback variance il the Planning (’ommission fee! i that the substandaid lot si/.c is a suflicicnt haidship. Pei liiit'iii /aiiiiiig Ordiiiiiiice Sections Sec. 78-305. Area, heigjit, lot width and yaid reipiiiements. 1 t»l Arni I til Wiilth hinnl Yard Siifr Y.iol Siilc Yaiil Aiijacciil lo Rciii Vuicllfccl) (aiir)Mrrl)(li’plj (frcl)Slice! ^fccl) 2 POO SO W SO SO Sec. 78 l.hSH Hard cover limitations. (h) Metween 75 feet and 250 feet ol the OIIWI,, there shall be no greater than 2.5 peicent hard cover. Between 25t) leet and 5t)t) feet of the OIIWI. thcie shall be no g.ieater than 30 pcicent hardcover. Between 500 li-et and 1,000 feet of the OIIWI, there shall be no greater than 35 percent h.inicover. FILE #04-3022 4 January 2005 Page 2 of 4 i) List of Exhibits A. Revised Survey B. Revised Hardcover Calculations by Surveyor C. Planning Conunission Report dated 1 1-8-04 D. 60-Day Extension Letter E. Planning Coiumission Action Notice dated 11-1 9-04 Background The applicants are requesting renewal of variances granted in 2000 for a rear yard setback variance in order to construct a dining room addition to the existing home. At the same time a variance to the front yard setback was granted in order for construction of a two- stall detached garage. Upon variance approval an atlaclwd garage was constructed and the rear yard setback variance was allowed to expire. In 2000, the applicant supplied hardcover numbers based on the premise that the entire lot was within the 500 ’ - 1000 ’ zone; however upon receiving an updated survey it has been determined that part of the property is within the 250 ’ - 500 ’ zone thus requiring the hardcover variance for the proposed addition. LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET Lot AreaAVidth: LR-IA l.«l Area 1 ot Width Required 2 acre (87.120 s.f.)"200 ’ Actual 0.54 acre (23,809 s.f.)189’ Setbacks: LR-lA Required Existine Proposed Front 50 ’33 ’33 ’ Rcir 50 ’ 57.5 ’ (house) 41.5 ’(deck) 17’ (pool & decking) 43.9 ’ (new addition) North Side 30*36.5 ’ (house) 9.3 ’ (shed) 38’ (new addition) South Side 30'70 ’No change Structural Coverauc: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 23.809 s.f (0.54 acre)Allowed; 3,57! s.f (15%) l’ropo.scd: 2,803 s.f (1 1 7%) o w Hardcover C'alcuialioiis: FILE «04.30i>2 4 January 2005 Page 3 of 4 Hardcover 7x)iiv Total Area in Tone Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover 250 - 500 13,633 s.f.4,090 s.f. (30%) 1,511 s.f.* (11%) 1,576 s.f. (11.5%) 500- 1000 4^ i* 1 n A ««««%.• « 10,176 s.f. A S a » I ^ M ^m, M ^ 1 ^ A m ^ 3,561 s.f. (357«) .3,404 s.f.* (33.5%) .3,418 s.f. (33.5 %) Rear Yard Setback Variance In 2000, llic Skoojjs received a front yard and rear yard setback variance in order to construct a garage and kitchen additions to their existing home. Upon approval of tlic variances the applicants constructed their garage addition, but were not able to construct their kitchen addition withiii ihe one-year time period and Mie rear yard setbac k variance expired. Hardcover Variance During the 2000 variance review the hardcover calculations were inconectly based on Ihe entire properly being located within the 500’- 1000’ /.one. With the renewal variance request stall' required an updated survey and revised Iwrdcover calculations to .show the newly constructed garage and the addition of a pool. Tho.se revisions were submitted by the applicants and reflected portions of the property within the 250’ - 500’ t'one. Currently the 250’ -500’ /.one is within hardcover limits but including rock lined with pla.slic the 500’ lOOO’ zone is exceeding the 35% limit. Hardship Statement Applicant has completed the Hardship Documentation Fonn attached as Exhibit B, and should be i'.sked for additional testimony regarding the application. Hardship Analysis lit considering applications for variance, (he Planning Commission sliaii consider the cjfeci of the pioposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, iight and air, danger of fire, risk to the pnbiic safety, and the effect on vatnes of property in the surrounding area. Ihe Ptanning Commission shall consider recommending approval for vaiiances from the literal provisions of the /oning Code In instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship hi’canse of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions wilt he in keeping with the Sfnn( anti iiuviii of ihe Oroiio /otiiny Coile. Stall finds that due to the size of tlic applicants ’ lot and the other lots in this neighborhood and the 2-acrc zoning district setback limitations there may be nardship to justity gianting the rear yard .seiback variance, however, the cx'stmg home is cuiiently conibrmmg with only the deck enc.'^oaching into the 50’ .setback. With respect to hardcover, upon removal of the plastic liners in the rock beds the property is within Ihe 35% limit for the 500’ 1000’ zone. 3 FILE #04-3022 4 January 2005 Page 4 of 4 Issues for Consideration Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Stair Recommendation If the Planning Commission feels that the size of the lot within a 2 acre zone is a si^ificant hardship then Planning Staff recommends approval of the rear yard setback variance for the kitchen addition. Additionally, the applicant should be required to remove all the plastic liners in the landscape beds to eliminate the need for a hardcover variance. t WIWI 5 I n»L- HARDCOVER CALCULATION VVORKSlI£iiT SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' <|50-5^ EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE ------ A. House X 500-1000' 6>59 SF. Length 0. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk X X X n. Patio/Dcck 13$"^ OEcK F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric 0. Other X X X X X X X X X TOT/X HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AIU£A IN ZONE A _____________ + B » PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE' A House X Length B. Oarage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Palio/Dcck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X X X X X X X X X X WidUl 464- Pool f pm, Of-cir ea ss a x= xt 8 8 a 1^67 ^33 X 100 IL5J. Widlh a IS, SF. SF. S.F. S.F. S.F. SF. ^7 *J F •/A'C P ‘ < PwtSF. S F.-oeciC7f 9c S F. - f^vO t CO. Sev»/ oiF nfi S.F. S.F. 5 <w Wk W50U5 A/^O ^ ■ iOROeH:^ S.F. A S.F. B % e p . PROpOSCO aOoitjom c^tti SF. SF. S.F. SF. S.F. SF. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F U Other TOTAL I lARDCO VER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A __ _ _ _ _ _ _ ♦ I)X 100 - SF S.F. % A D P" I ^ W |C t/ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* 75-250’ 250-500* EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A House X « Length •7.7 X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk E. Palio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G. Othern|fl()f^ 68 LT. ^cf3^ TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A __ _ _ _ _ + B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE* A House X Length X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio^cck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabno X X G. Other WidUi 7,r Sm ss s c: X 100 Width Rev. n-id-oV S.F. -uaosE JSl/ 130 2i?Z 374 3770 \o,t7€ ?7. /■? *• 1 I 3101TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 3770 EX 6T1H*, ^ 11 TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE • • A _____________ + B____________xlOO - ’ T7.i> 10. 176 S.F. -5weo S.F. S F -5**''*^ S.F. Q n Lo.i S.F. ^ S.F.-WX4V^?ro£> S.F. S.F.- ocac. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. * Ayi', _ wOffO S.F.- eoAoens S.F. A S.F. B % S.F. S.F. S.F.AJ^TCAM S.F. S.F. S.F.- • SF. SF. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 3.F. A S.F. B V« EXitIBiT C. Date Application Received: 05-13-04 Date Application Considered as Complete: 10-26-04 60-Day Review Period Ripires: 12-26-04 FILE #04-3022 6 November 2004 Page 1 of 3 To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Ralm and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc, City Administrator Melanie Curtis, City Planner November 8,2004 04-3022, Phil & Karen Skoog, 280 Tonka Avenue, - Renewal Variances - public hearing 2Uming District: Lot Area: LR-1 A, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 2 acrcs/200* 0.54 acre (23,809 s.f.) Applicatio'i Summary: The applicants are requesting renewal of variances granted in 2000 for e rear yard setback variance in order to construct a dining room addition to the existing home. Additionally, a 500’- 1000’ zone hardcover variance is requited based on new information, unless the plastic liner is removed from the landscape beds._________ Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the rear yard setback variance if the Planning Commission feels that the substandard lot size is a sufficient hardship. _________________ __ Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections Sec. 78-305. Area, height, lot width and yard requirements. (b) Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed: Lot Aren (octe) Lot Width (Tcci) FronI Yard (feet) Side Yard (feet) Side Yard Ac^acent to Street (feel) Rear Yard (feet) 2 200 50 30 50 50 Sec. 78-1288. Hard cover limitations. (b) Between 75 feet and 250 feet of the OHWL, there shall be no greater than 25 percent hard cover. Between 250 feet and 500 feet of the OHWL there shall be no greater than 30 percent hardcover. Between 500 feel and 1,000 feet of the OHWL there shall be no greater than 35 percent hardcover. List of Exhibits A. Application 13. 1 lardship Documentation Form C. lixisting & Proposed Survey/Site Plan D. I lardcovcr Calculations by Surveyor E. Resolution No. 4531 F. Survey & Hardcover Calculations from 2000 Variance Approval G. Property Owners List H. Plat Map FILE »04-3C22 8 November 2C04 Page 2 cf 3 Background Tlic tippliainis arc requesting renewal of variances granted in 2000 for a rear yard setback variance in order to construct a dining room addition to the existing home. At tlie same time a variance to the front yard setback was granted in order for construction of a two- stall detached garage. Upon variance approval an attached garage was constructed and tlie rear yard setback variance was allowed to expire. In 2000, the applicant supplied hardcover numbers based on the premise that the entire lot was within the 500 ’ - 1000 ’ zone; however upon receiving an updated .survey it iias been determined that part of the property is within the 250 ’ - 500 ’ zone Ihu.s requiring the hardcover variance for tl;e pioposed addition. LOT ANALYSIS WORSIIKET Lot Arca/Width: LR-IA lx)t Area Ixit Width Required 2 acre (87.120 s.f.)200 ’ Actual 0.54 acre (23,809 s.f.)189’ Setbacks; LR-IA Required Eiisting Proposed Front 50’33’33’ Rear 50’ 57.5’ (house) 41.5’(deck) 17’ (pool & decking) 46 5’ (new addition) Nortli Side 30’36.5’ (house) 9.3’ (shed)No change Smith Side 30’70 ’No change Structural Coverage: Total liOt Area ToUil sStruclural Coverage 23,809 s.f (0.54 acre)Allowed: 3,571 s.f (15%) Propo.sed: 2,803 s.f (11.7%) Hardcover Calculation.^; Hardcover Zone Total Area in Zone Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Propo.sed Hardcover 250 500 13,633 s.f 4,090 s.f (30%) 1,511 s.f* (1 1 %) 1,576 s.f (n.5*/o) 500- 1000 10,176 .s.f 3,561 s.f (35%) 3,404 s.f* (33.5%) 3,418 s.f (33.5 %) • After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds V. « 'i I ^ i. s FILE #04-3022 8 November 2004 Page 3 of 3 Rear Yard Setback Variance In 2000, the Skoogs received a front yard and rear yard setback variance in order to construct a garage and kitchen additions to their existing home. Upon approval of the variances the applicants constructed their garage addition, but were not able to construct their kitchen addition within the one-year time period and the rear yard setback variance expired. Hardcover Variance During the 2000 variance review the hardcover calculations were incorrectly based on the entire property being located within the 500*- 1000 ’ zone. With the renewal variance request stalT required an updated survey and revised hardcover calculations to sliow the newly constructed garage and the addition of a pool. Those revisions were submitted by the applicants and reflected portions of the property within the 250 ’ - 500 ’ zone. Currently the 250 ’ -500 ’ zone is within hardcover limits but including rock lined with plastic the 500 ’ - 1000 ’ zone is exceeding the 35% limit. Hardship StatemenI Applicant has completed the Hardship Documentation Form attached as Fxhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Hardship Analysis In cunsidering applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger offire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property In the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending cpproval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will he in keeping witn the spirit and Intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Staff finds that due to the size of the applicants’ lot and the other lots in this neighborhood and the 2-acre zoning district setback limitations there may be hardship to justify granting the rear yard setback variance, however, the existing home is currently conforming with only the deck encroaching into the 50 ’ setback. Witli respect to hardcover, upon removal of the plastic liners in »he rock beds the property is within the 35% limit for the 500 ’ - 1000 ’ zone. I.WUCS for Considerution Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Staff Kccoromcndation If the Planning Commission feels that the size of the lot within a 2 acre zone is a significant hardship then Planning Staff recommends approval of the rear yard setback variance for the kitchen addition. Additionally, the applicant should be required to remove all the plastic liners in the landscape beds to eliminate the need for a hardcover variance. / City of Orono Variance Application Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Main: 952-249^600 fax: 952-249-4616 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 I , Application# 0^^ ' Date Received. Amount Paid ^ Staff: Fee S600 Renewal: 5300 After-the-fact; S1.200 Double Fee This application form must be completed in full. Appicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application, incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas. PROPERTY INFORMATION: Site Address: _____rQSO Property Identification Number (PIN): (Attach legal description to application if not mcluded on the survey.) Date Property Acquired (mpn^/year): L\(A □ Yes, I own the adjacent parcels. Present use of property; J$|pe^identiaT' □ Other Zoning District: _ \Jl^\ HT APPLICANT INFORMATION: (Complete legal na.~es and marital status requ're J for each interested party) Name: ___I * i\ \ > • : . t. ■ ■____V. >\»•t(■?_ ^ o' 'tjv ~ • Phone (home): C- ^ Address: _ Email: ■> V, •-7"<r> »• J /•! 7 ( _ Phone (v;ork):f 7 7 • 1 hi»\-• o Fax: OWNER INFORMATION: (Complete legal names aid marital status '■equired for each interestec party) Name: j- /•! i;*.. :i: • ' I o,. jTU o Phone (home): ^ ji[ Address: Sx ? o "Tr>. < Email: '\'J Phone (work): . .r : •• I'ric f> r.C < 't*- Fax: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Estimated Project Cost: $ 7 yoo Describe the request in detail (attach additional sheets If necessary): — 6^1 id—ii Gltc.^______L8 f -----K o*r\si----------1-----Lu-.ci,t__ o ^ f i-i~i K t.fcf-t ^0 Vi ft cr 51;; -j f . -A • : • • • ■ ' i .'hi .V REQUIRED SUBMITTALS: All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for you application to be processed. □□ / □ . I ■a' Pre-Application Meeting Form, completed by a City Planner. Completed Application Form Completed Hardship Documentation Form Certified Property Owners List - owners within 150’ of the subject property, labels and plat map List, labels and map may be obtained from Hennepin County Department of Finance Government Center, A-603 300 South 6*’’ Street, Minneapolis, telephone 612-348-5910 Original Certificate of Sun/ey (signed by a licensed surveyor), meeting all the requirements listed within this packet, including hardcover calculations. Also provide one copy 8.5” x 11* or 11" X 17" for reproduction. Completed hardcover calculation worksheets (as provided within the variance packet). -Topfjgraphio-survey - including existing and proposed elevations. Provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or 11" X 17" for reproduction. "SlcefcTT55-or plans of floor and elevation views (provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or 11" x 17"). Additional items may be requested by City Staff depending on the scope of the project. * APPLICANT’S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses iricurred in review of this application and certifies that the information supplied is £>■06 and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that he/she is solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until It is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. Applicant's Signature: Applicant’s Signature; Date: Date: U'-/ -C)V OWNER’S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultant?, agents. Commission & Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s Signature: • Owner’s Signature: Date; Date: Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are normally held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. #30 i>' Htas/ Page 1 of3 HARDSHIP DOCUMENTATION FORM This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is complete and submitted to the City. Minnesota State Statue Section 394.27, Subdivision 7 requires that a hardship be demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The hardship must be unique to the property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considered valid hardships. In order for an application to be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council a hardship having merit must be demonstrated. HOW DO I PROVE A HARDSHIP? This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if a hardship exists and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove a hardship, address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered. Please address each of these hardship criteria as they relate to the request (some may not apply): 1."The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls." I ^ A A. \ I u o\- ^ ^ ^ Y 2."The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner." \r\ 1,-^ -------1 Q VVa cf!^ The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." _______Ll:_____^ A ^ I 1 1 » P I K-\ ^ Ly a Kc> f ^ r ^A u 5 P_ I I N____fv^1 r I r ^ 1 a LA- ^ T* ’fi /" rrciV "Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ II (On -4 f ' f w < U <• 1• \ *v • f • -,.v5 \ ••• Page 2 of3 5.“Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes. Section t16J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter." TX7 / /7^ 6.‘The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or Ui? Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this C*.spter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." Page 3 of 3 12.“The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty.” ^ So. >-•_____f)Ci t ■»*.. Hardship Statement Should you feel the hardship cannot fully be described m the above criteria, describe the unique hardship, practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance 1 EMie-irp I • • IJARDCOVKU CALCULA'I ION VVOUKSII£0 SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250’ <^5ol^ 500-1000' EXISTING HAKnCOVER IN ZONE A. House l^ngOi WidiJt X X X B. Gofage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X li. Palio/Dcck 1^7 ^X X 464 - paot f rtwc F. Landscope Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X 0. Other TOTAI. HAIIDCO VER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A + B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONF/ A. House Lenglh X X X D. Oorage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Potio/Deck X X !*\ LtuKlsca))c Uiidcrluin By Plastic Or Fobfic Q Other TOTAL MAiy^COVER IN ZONE total PKOHI-RTY area IN ZONE A _______ ♦ 0 I i • X 100 Width SZ >8 59 1969 itsL SF. SF. S.F. SF SF. S.F. SF. o p A g p 'fPt'rL sF.-ot<iKrf po S.F. - 9ftV0tco* 'jdOiH oiP Ufi S.F. S.F. S pyROCK OW PU«51 __ WAUi ano S.F. A S.F. B % + ^ //9 o c . 42]ELiLl_ST. AOotTiort S.F. S.F. SF. NCT C-Atti SF. SF. S F. ■ SF. SF. S.F. S.F. SF. S.F. S.F. - =ir#KlOO SF. SF. H A 0 n-o% ■ 1 •pTJTU — •. • 0 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZOWE: (CIRCLE ONE) EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House 0-75* X Length •7,7 X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E Palio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain Plastic Or Fabric 0.3 X X X G. 0(her|2|^^^(t TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A + B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A House Length B. Oarage X X X C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Paiio/Dcck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X 75.250*250-500* WidUi •7.ST X 100 Width 0. Other ft TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ + B X 100 - 1^30 S F. I SU 130 ZiPZ 174 3770 \o.l7€ 77. A? (H /^// wi^ i 'll - SF. -5w£0 SF. S p _ 5u/»w<, Zt€T SF. c r 6i?.««/C^L S.?.-WAuti/,roo S.F. S.F.- DF-^K S.F. • S.F. S.F. S.F. - ROCK Pm: uftkfO S.F.- fWrtoPRJ S.F. A S.F. B % S.F. gp fPofosefi S.F. S F (lAlAt S.F. S.F. S.F.- S.F. S.F. S.F SF. SF. SF. SF. S.F. S.F. % A B k i B>cHl6fr & 4.0^738562;.^ CITY of ORONO awsBoS'^ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _4 C • . /%•: A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.27. SUBDIVISION 5(B), - i, tnc. FILE NO. 2608 WHEREAS, Philip A. Skoog and Karen S. Skoog, (liereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 280 Tonka Avenue within llie City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as foiiows; Lots 9 and 10, Block 2, Lot 18. Block 5, “Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka", and that part of Hill Street vacated which lies between the Southerly extensions of the East and West lines of said Lot 9, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and t WHEREAS, the applicant.s have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.27, Subdivision 5(B) to allow a rear yard setback of 39 ’ where 50' is reejuired for a dining room addition to the rear of the residence and Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.27, Subdivision 5(B) to allow a front yard .setback of 43' where 50' is required to allow a two stall detached garage to the soutli side of the residence. WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Pianning Commission held a public hearing on September 18.2000, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. Minneseta: • » 1. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2608. The property is located in the LR-1 A, Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District, where 2 acres or 87,120 s.f. is the minimum lot area. I he propeit}’ consists of approximately .55 acres or 23,750 s.f. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 1 8,2000 TrAAl-:Sf=5v.R • I'T'r’Hirr.) Page I of 5 NOV ftO 2000 B'— oT o 1^ CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.4 i 5. and recommended approval by a vote of 7 to 0. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. The '/a acre lot is small compared to the LR-IA zoning district 2-acre standard. B. Hardcover in the 500-1000' zone will increase to 13.3%, remaining below ihe allowed 35%. C.Structural coverage on the property will increase to 9.9%, remaining below the allowed 15%. D. The residence was built prior to cuiTCnt zoning standards. n.The neighboring residence adjacent to the proposed setback encroacluncnts arc sufficiently distant so as to be not negatively impacted by the encroachment. The City Council finds that the conditions c.xisting on this properly are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or dilTiculty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive P!;’.:: of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safely and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 5 « am.CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ‘i’-' '' CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.27, Subdivision 5(B) to allow a rear yard setback of 39' where 50' is required for a dining room addition to the rear of the residence and Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.27, Subdivision 5(B) to allow a front yard setback of 43' where 50' is required to allow a two stall detached garage to the south .side of the residence. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicant attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are pennissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or these variances will expire on that date (October 9,2001). 3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of tliis variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopletl by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 9th day of October, 2000. Page 3 of 5 /oT o ^CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.4 Property Owner (s) / STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF I lENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument \va.s acknowledged before me on this 9th day of October, 2000 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) rST' HEW H. STUW^ ) .ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this !/ jh day of «. t . 2000, before me a Notaiy Public within and for said County, personally appeared i * • /known .... v—• “ —-------------j » I--------------------------------/ —ri — » *...................... .1 ■ ■ ■■■ to me to be the pcrson(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. _/K- O n / C( NotaiMmiM STATBOI'MINNI-SOTA ) ) SS. I % COUNTY OF I lENNEPIN ) £JlJL!ir__LL HNSON I NCSOTA I rn.*i.m I On this day of 2000, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appealed known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed tlic same as his (their) free act and deed. Notaiy Public Page 4 of 5 i .! <u I 4^' 5 C I • ••• ?. .• •*• *• frvrv^ 6^ouon or\ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET O, SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75'75-250'250-500''500-1000' A. House -wV^Vf w CtIK Jil /iVyivC# X • cs ' 1570-3^ s.F. •Xjeafth X Width rx S.F. X ■s S.F. X sa S.F. • B. •Gzrzge-• • ■ . • • , V ^ • - • . • * • a • • • • • 0• -S.F. * • ‘m ' •• • C. Driveway * . • • • • •• , M'S* • X • •• il "• • • •« ta • ■ ■ iSlO’ ■ S.F. X •S.F. D. Sidewalk X 9 CS • S.F. X eu S.F. E. Patio/Deck X ao. 1 cs S.F. X M S.F. F. Landscape ' • X • 9 ta S.F. Underlain X S.F. By Plastic X cx • S.F. Or Fabric G. Other •• X • 1 ^ S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A • AnOlo -5-. B xlOO .» S.F. S.F. • ■ .. (LJd____^ • PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONK i • *9 i‘^70. s.F.A> House X C3 Ltoiih i? X . Width t3M>cx iL^7..9 S.F. X m S.F. X «S.F. B. Garage C. Driveway M • X ri 6 s.F, n ? 10 S.F. X n S.F. D. Sidewalk X •• •. ' ' S.F. • • . . • X •* •S.F. E. Patio^cck X • • • M • * • ' * S.F. X «x S.F.’ 9 F. Landscape X »s.F. Underlain X S«P • By Plastic Or Fabric X 3«P • • • • s.F.G. 0±er X * TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE ■ 3ISSJ9 _s.p. s.F.TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ‘-• A 9 3.\6^A% + B X100 ft <1 0cfn6irp’' Q) I c 4f-Z602 L*' i Hill I (r^ot- •• TT/^/Wf^ ffAAi»>jAC4 r rA/CMf»^r~>^ ^ -•*.........{•••TO BE VACATED ..............^ I —- \ *.• % •. .• XI- o Str fravah fN CQ 5 • • • % USSE^SB \^AQ*\a/ IN89‘48'h'\25.25 •’ E'^IStinJ She/ sayVflf 125 2S Tf. I ■.■ .................-A..'.! *• *4< • Cxisf/n^ 4< ^ Garage-. B. II • • • •!**. : *..•S/l«c/ • • F^isfifv^ ••*5 owo £ D Ov/n RUN DATE :5/iy2004 38 0511723130028 PROPADDR 295 TONICAAVE OWNER NAME M M SCHMITZ A K SCHMITZ TAXPAYER MICHAEL & KATHERINE SCHMITZ NAME/ADDR 295 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 0511723130050 PROP ADDR 245 TONKA AVE |OWNEK NAME MARY KAY MCCARTY TAXPAYER MARY MCCARTY . NAMEyADDR 245 TONKA AVR I IjONGLAKEMN 55356 38 0511723140022 PROP ADDR 265 CRESTVIEW AVE OWNER NAME SUSAN MCCARTHY TAXPAYER SUSAN MCCARTHY NAME/ADDR 265 CRFiiTVIEW AVE LONGl^KEMN 55356 38 0511723140025 PROPADDR 285 CRESTVIEW AVE OWNER NAME SANDRA J NICCUM TAXPAYER SANDRA I NICCUM NAME/ADDR CRESTVIEW AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 0511723140030 PROP ADDR 315 CRESTVIEW AVE OWNER NAME R A EDDINGTON^- J EDDINGTON TAXPAYER ROBERT & TAMARA EDDINGTON NAME/ADDR 315 CRESTVIEW AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 0511723140061 PROPADDR 280 TONKA AVE OWNERNAME PAAKSSKOOG TAXPAYER PMIIJP it KAREN SKOOG NAME/ADDR 280 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 0511723130029 PROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED OWNERNAME ESTHER M ADDISON TAXPAYER ESTHER M ADDISON NAMF7ADDR 3382 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 0511723140020 PROP ADDR 245 CRESTVIEW AVE OWNERNAME GERRY J TRAINOR TAXPAYER GERRY J TRAINOR NAME/ADDR 245 CRESTVIEW AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05117231400^3 PROP ADDR 275 CRESTVIEW AVE OWNER NAME HAROLD R HANSON ETAL TAXPAYER HAROLD R HANSON NAME/ADDR 2 /5 CRESTVIEW AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 0511723140028 PROP ADDR 250 TONKA AVE OWNERNAME GERALDLBRK jCS/IRENE BRIGGS TAXPAYER GERALD A IRENE BRlCiGS NAME/ADDR 250 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 0511723140031 PROP ADDR 325 CRESIVIE W AVE OWNERNAME WILLIAM LSULUVAN TAXPAYER WILLL\M SULLIVAN NAME/ADDR Ml7 REGENT AVE N 8105 BROOKLYN PARK MN 55443 38 0511723140062 PROP ADDR 330 TONKA AVE OWNER NAME BRUCE SINGER A LINDA SINGER TAXPAYER BRUCE SINGER A UNDA SINGER NAME/ADDR 330 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 PAGE: 1 38 0511723130030 PROP ADDR 3400 BAYSIDE RD OWNERNAME DAS ESTERS TAXPAYER DANIEL A SANDRA ESTERS NAME/ADDR 3400 BAYSIDE RD LONGUKEMN 55356 38 0511723140021 PROP ADDR 255 CRESTVIEW AVE OWNERNAME STEPHANIE REIMAN TAXPAYER STEPHANIE REIMAN NAME/ADDR 255 CRESTVIEW AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 0511723140024 PROP ADDR 285 CRESTVIEW AVE OWNERNAME SANDRA J NICCUM TAXPAYER SANDRA J NICCUM NAME/ADDR 285 CRESTVIEW AVE LONGIAKEMN 55356 38 0511723140029 PROP ADDR 230 TONKA AVE OWNER NAME D MARCUSSEN A M MARCUSSEN TAXPAYER DANIEL A MARY MARCUSSEN NAME/ADDR 6697 OLSON MEMORIAL HWY GOIXIEN VALLEY MN 55427 38 051 1723140039 PROP ADDR 340 TONKA AVE OWNERNAME PATRKKJSKEIE TAXPAYER PATRICK JSKEIE NAME/ADDR 5710 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 55364 \9 "•s.:! • ■■ -J fO o \\ I % A* ' / V > 00t^iri> CITY of ORONO Municipal Ofllces Street Mdress; 2750 Kelley Parl«way Orono. MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 0C66 November 19,2004 Phil & Karen Skoog 280 Tonka Avc Long Lake, MN 55356 RE: 60-Day Review Period RxttMisiun Application # 04-3022 State law provides that Cities shall make decisions on zoning requests within 60 days from the date of application, and that this review period may be extended by notification to the applicant. Your application was received on May 15, 2004 and was considered to be complete on October 26, 2004, and the 60-day review period would end on December 26, 2004. However, based on conversations with you afier the Planning Commission meeting it appears that there are unresolved issues and you may wish to revise your request. Therefore, the 60-day review period is hereby extended an additional 60 days to February 25, 2005. Please contact me with any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, City of Orono ' uittfmiam Melanie Curtis City Planner TUepbone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249.4616 wwwxi.orono.mn.HS IRONO il (Mikes Maiiini Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 553230066 lUcsls within 60 days ixtcndcd by notification i and was considered to would end on December )nnnission meeting it Mse your request. iiionat 60 days to CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 952.249.4600 TO: Plhl & Karen Skoog 280 Tonka Ave Long Lake, MN 55356 ZONING FILE 04-3022 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: November 19,2004 COPIESi TYPE OF REQUEST: Variance DATE OF MEETING; November 1 5,2004 Planning Commission recommended as follows: To approve rear yard setback variance for a kitchen addition willi the condition that all llic plastic and fabric liners be removed fiom all landscape areas. VOTE:7 FOR 0 AGAINST If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Conunission. If you have questions, please call City Planner, Melanie Curtis at 952.249.4627. Dale Application Kiccivcd: OH-18-04 Dale Application C.'ompictc: 09-13-04 120-Day Review Period F.xicndcd: 03-10-05 m 2 4 2005 Cll r UH OHUMJ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION i:)ate:Jciiuiary 20, 2005 Item No. Department Approval: Name: Melanie Curtis Jyj|l^ Title: City Planner ’ Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: Item De.scription: //04-3G52 - Eric Vogslrom - 2618 Ca.sco Point Road - Variances Zoning District: Lot Area: Lot Width: LR-IC, One I'amily Lakeshore Residential, 0.5 acre/100’ 0.47 acre/20,561 s.f. 100’ parallel to the shore & 80’ @ 75 ’ .setback List of Exhibits: A. Resolution per Council Direction n. Vegetation Restoration Plan (VRP) C. Engineer C.’oniments to VRJ’ I). Stall Amendments to VRP E. VRP Agreement F. Council Memo of 01-04-05 Application .Summary: The most recent revision of this application was conceptually approved at your previous meeting based on reductions to the proposed building footprint and hardcover levels. That approved revision consisted of a 1,499 s.f. building footprint and associated hardcover totaling 31.7% for tlie 75 ’-250’ zone. A revi.scd Vegetation Restoration Plan (VRP) was al.so reviewed. The VRP has also been reviewed by the City F.ngineer, Planning Staff and the adjoining property owner. Further revisions based on the comments t)f the various reviewing parties have been incorporated into the version of the VRP whicli will be enforced by the Agreemetit attached as Exhibit E. Staff has received a copy of the private agreement between the applicants and the neighboring property owners which resolves the illegal tree removal issue by the applicants on the neighbor’s property. Planning Staff Recommendation Approve or amend the attached Resolution aiul VRP Agreement. Restoration Plan The ('ity l•ngineer has had an opportunity to review the applicant’s revised VRP and has provided comments. In addition to the Engineer comments Stall has al.so incorporated Staff comments with the adjoining neighbors’ concerns into an addendum to become part of Uie fmal approved VRP. Council Action Requested ApjMove or amend the attached Resolution and VRP Agreement. A RES0I.UT10N «RAN I ING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONINO CODE SECTION 78-1288 SUHniVISION B FILE NO. 04-3052 WHEREAS, Eric Joel Vogstrom and Idizabcth A. Vogstroin, husband and wife (hereinafter “the applicunt.s") are Ihc owners of die property located at 2618 Casco Point Road within Ihc City of Orono (hereinafter the “City") and legally described as follows: North 80 feet of Block 3, Winships Subdivision of Lot 1, Spring Park Second Addition, Hennepin County. Minnesota (hereinafter the “property”); .and WHEREAS, the applicants have made application to the City of Oroim fur a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code .Section 78-1288 Subdivision B to allow 31.7% hardcover within the 75 ’-250’ zone where 25% is normally allowed in conjunction with the construction of a new single ftimily residence. NOW, THEREFORE HE IT RE.SOLVEI) by the City Cmincil of Orono, Miiuie.sota: FINDINGS 1. 2. lliis application was reviewed ns Zoning File //O4-3052. The property is located in the I.R-IC One l•■amily l.akcshorc Residential Zoning District which rei|uires a inininuiin lot area of Yj acre and a minimum lot width of 100*. 3.Tire Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearings held on September 20. October 18, and November 15, 2004 and recommended approval of variances based on Uic following (mdings; a, Tlie applicants* properly is 20,561 s.f. or 0.47 acre in area and has 100’ in width at a line parallel to the .shore and 80' in width at the 75 ’ setback. Page I of 6 4. 5. 6. b. Tlic property is divided into two non-coutigiioiis portions by tlie lagoon. The applicants’ land access to the non-contiguous piece is walking access over the adjacent City right-of-way. c. The applicants’ existing driveway is located almost wholly on the adjacent City right-of-way. With the redevelopment of this property the applicants wilt abandon the existing driveway. The City Council reviewed this application on October 25. November 8 and 22, and December 15, 2004 and January 10 and 24, 2005 and makes the following additional findings: a.I'he proposed house footprint exclusive of decks at 1,499 s.f has been minimized to an appropriate level for the size of the property. The proposed 75 ’- 250 ’ zone hardcover level of 31.7% is the minimum hardcover necessary to support the proposed house while providing for adequate driveway and other site plan elements. b. The applicants have removed vegetation in violation of City Codes on their property and on the neighboring property. The restoration of the vegetation will be dealt with separately from the variance Resolution with an approved Vegetation Restoration Plan and Agreement with the City. c. 'I he applicants have reached an agreement with the adjacent |)roperty owner with respect to the tree removal and screening. d. Tlie grading and drainage plan shall include gutters, downspouts, swales, etc as determined necessary to guarantee the runoff from the applicants’ property does not negatively affect the adjacent properties. Tlie City Council has considered this application including the liiulings and lecommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by C'ity staff, comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, .safety and welfare ol tlie community. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property arc peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic Page 2 of 6 I conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, OKDKR AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the aliove findings, the Orono City Council lieieby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code .Section 78-1788 Subdivision B to allow 31.7% hardcover within the 75 ’-250 ’ zone where 25% is normally allowed in conjunction with construction of a new single family residence subject to the following conditions; 1.Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants and aimotatcd by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan which are not in conformity with City codes will require further Plamiing Commission and City Council review. 2. Hardcover in the 0-75 ’ zone shall not increase above the level of 0 s.f or 0%. Hardcover in the 75-250 ’ zone .shall be limited to 2,432 s.f. or 31.7% per the proposed plan and hardcover allowance simimary as depicted on Exhibit A. Applicants are advised that any future requests to increase hardcover or change the nature of cxisting/approved hardcover shall require City approval, and increases in hardcover will not likely be approved without concurrent reduction in existing hardcover. 3. Applicants shall remove all plastic or fabric liner material from the decorative land.seape beds on the property to ensure their permeability as non-hardeover surfaces. 4. Applicants shall remove all gravel hardcover on the adjacent right-of-way and establi.sh vegetation .suitable vegetative groundcover by .September 30, 7.005. 5. Rei|uired removals of structure and hardcover shall be completed prior to the footing inspection for the new residence. Page 3 ol 6 J 6. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicants shall enter into an Agreement with the City regarding their Vegetation Restoration Plan assuring it’s execution. 7. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (January 24,2006). 8. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this re.solution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 9. The provisions of this variance resolution shall not become effective until the Vegetation Restoration Plan has been executed to the City’s satisfaction. 10. The undersigned applicants have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of the applicants and the applicants’ heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 24*** day of January, 2005. AITEST: Linda S. Vcc, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owncr(s) Page 4 of 6 liL. i 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of , 2005 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of , 2005 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 L STATE OF MINNESO TA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN This instrument was acknowledged before me this__day of by Eric Joel Vogstrom, husband of Elizabeth A. Vogstrom. ,2005 Notary Public STATE OF MINNESO TA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN This instrument was acknowledged before me this__day of by Elizabeth A. Vogstrom, wife of Eric Joel Vogstrom. ,2005 Notary Public Page 6 of 6 ^arth /inf of L/tock ,S. Winships \Subd. of Lot /, Spfmg Park 2nd Addition i • m -?• FJrr, I Tree s I locKjtio as per not fit •4 »sroMr»N MU. d \! : / \ {.•W* ^rwM SHUi^.^ 5i -••«. \ \ f \ \5 dgh'oo \ —2{U0 {- \ y^lf SfifUC* khi Mr itu/np . , Stoiu s'r*’ :I.{5C0 . / mfof$fock iSubd, oj Lot ~ / <* .a M... Jh</ AMtidn $ -^3bSulr»’ — l>-Nizns* L L ^.... « 1.3‘nn P§o 9tutnp$ hcothn $hom 0g por dtont ^ not fkM rmrffMi t.5* Buckthorn Troo ttump hcothn ahown os por ethnt not thh ¥0f1M ,KoOd dii:cje>cuirii \of -2>^_ •ilOWHS —160 00— 5 397J'00“ £■ __________ I ■ 'f'H I» OvyvK/vj. S^Acft' 1 Hi //• /i Tree Preseh/atlon Notes: A€> r?rjLfS / /• ^ —r! ----- 1/ ¥* 5lun^»-!:?j 4* 7/* >rv«r 5fMTfV [/ / f I !§ '!• Aah Troo otuap hcothn ahom os por dhnt not Boh mUM I ^ / BeUkHUAMBfOBcrmoN / r / / V J I__y_/ / «I..•■'-.•■/ 5' I'nti Troo atump hcothn shown por chont not BoM Yori/!oB V w // /- 4 - 1. All information on this drawing provided to MarKell-Laberee by Vogue Design. 2. 26 Trees were removed within the 75* lakeshore setback and Road Right-Of-Way, counting each stem of dumps as Individuals. 3. 7 Trees were removed within the city right-of-way. 4. 5 Trees were removed on neighboring property. 5. The total number of trees to be replaced is 38. 6. City requires a minimum 3* restoration tree per tree removed. Contractor can opt to upsize trees over specified size. 7. Recommend planting trees outside of wetland delineation to higher elevations near removed tree location. Higher elevations will insure tree viability from standing In vrater. Do not plant within root zone of a removed tree to prevent bacteria from' decaying wood to effect restoration trees. 8. Recommend removal of Buckthorn (noxious weed) to allow desirable restoration trees to flourish. 9. During a walk-thru of the site, I observed numerous stumps with I beaver damage, internal dry rot, and elms trees still standing _______________I___ with signs of Dutch Elm Disease. 4* S(pneo Troo stump hcothn shown os por cHont not tkU soriM 'o 0 .r S97J'00" £ —9J15— :2“ .^pn/c« Boo atumpa hcothn shown as por dtont not Boh >roriBe4 V in i V / .(doti ©' •0HC W / 40 ’ mhn Grm 4 WtldHawtr MlHi fw Welir LvfSM nnvy M SIM Mm4m» Gfma Mli (4 h4/kotf • **»«*4 »«»a< »»•#••« M 4««a4<ee«4 . * 2 -M , , ......,..................Him . _ lACK ...................-.........1 0% 1 IgmtCmwaMfLtmah ... .......„ ^ - ......- ...........2 0% aaawo wtrmkain^ __________^___,, .13 0% ____4 0% 4 «t r adlinl ^....... 1 p% a vargwatm^.......___ ______3 0% - . 2 0% ____, -- -y___ 13% ^- ^,11------------------yitetfj——10% »•«« ♦*a.aaaa*»e<P»e»w»»*»»w*we 2 0^^ ....2 w »«e»4»«>»a»aa«e44w»^ • • *«*44 4«4iN»Mr • - 4*»w*a*»»e**r**»a»a»aa 0^^ .iikt.fLS .JmPLS MTfL MR CFl) ■ M144IMSI to^ Tfifivii g>«il hywop (^fiartocAf .......................2.0% PrairiB Ouoa MStiaw ......* Lftifp**** (Bsnrpho amractnt)^..........................— 5.0% OttOorfly BiHrNwad {Asekpha twkorooa).^...........—~ Smoolb Wue Mter LAahr laeoit).........—«*—-2.0% Amts asks {Atfar oohtmmghnstM)—----------------------------------- pmriiigiB pea {Cooaia fotkulBlo^..^..,^..................................................2.0% StifTtkkMd {CoroopoU pahaohf......-...................—..—...2.0% • Ptk pwpto oontfloim {Edhmrt a pattkh)..----------------------------5 05^ CreMny gwilltn (ContkstafioatBo).....................-...... 1.0% Conunofi ox-tyt (fMhpiit kotkauhokhs)............... 5i)% ^ RiMod iKided buill clov*r (Uapodeaa capMa)----------------------------3i>H Rott^ Mfitnt kss {JUooris asparo!) ........* ...hi.....................................-• 6i)% tXdtai btabai UK \ihlrU pumetaapf----------------------------------------- WtM liipiM tj[.¥pmmporamtii .....................................................,«.^.»4.0% Wild kKiMPOl (Mwwdb/bfidno).................—i-----------------««...2.0% Wksmy piMHaini (Pewahmm grmJ^flonn/.............................-..i.-..- 3 0% WliiK pnirit clow (Fetohatamum camMuot)-------------------- 12.0H hMpb priino clow {Faiahtitmum purpmwum)-----11.0% YeSow oooeflow {Mohbwh pmnata) ..................... 3 0% Blick «y«d Susan ikwdbrtim hrfa) ........10 0% Buff faldciifod {Sntwhgo rifidoV .............—....................... ...20% Sliewy gpldcnrod {Soluhgo tpattow)......................p ........................* 2 0% Fvaina ipidcnwl ( TVadeKOwno bntctnna)------- 2,0% Moa^y wfwn (IVc4«iio jUrif to) .. .,.h,....-m»*.~-m^....~..».5.0% |lcait4Q[if gpyoo alewidm (Zuh apicro)............................................iS!% S«i|gaotod nMa^crt----------------------------------------------------------------*****J’“,/‘ Ss^gKtod WWI.000 a^Mto ------------------------------------------------«• fAHt. MDC (YSl. Sadat Mf dro WUdltotofairB^ Mud plaaUio {^uma iu4cor«wtoK).....--.....v-^ lodlfo huah Cdaiotf|>^A*<Rlca*<l)»~— Swamp mittnaaed {Aactopku hcamoaa) New EofUad aaht {Astar mrroo mptha).— Fta(4op^ aiUr {Aiter mmkoUoha) y/kKhoaiMLiCkmmacutaio)----- Wliilt praiHa clovK {Daloa canBIAm)., Purido pmina tlow {Dalaa pmpwwmi) ....< .••...••MM ... ...MMMMMM.M I ..»».»•»«».•»»> •.M.M»..M» »«»•«• ..^•M.M M...M •«• ..MM.M ...............................................................................^ . M...M..M..M....M.M..M• • ■■.>•«iin-t—T-mi SuggmCfd f4utt¥o Gnoo A WfldfWwcr Mlt— For PyT.(^«flc) Sifet WBtre Vertical Teitime to DoakraB • e«e*««e«r Sbowy Uck tsttoA {DoManodium camsknao) iUnkfnaln maslK (Krtnghm yucct/dth).... Soepfo waud {Kapalorimw wuKuitmm) — Bonaaat (ffkpotaHiMf parfatiaium) .m....m.mm Snoeimwed (He/<tVi«Miii#i«wal») riii'K' et<5«i-fs ‘ ____53% ____2.9% -m-..5.3% MaxonUliaa lunllowcr (Hctianthm maHmOkmf^ Faiit aunnower (//»/wJ|p»i7 A«/lmi#fc®<dif)..— 1 1%aj(g-ff -—I .y Oh _______2.9H KeriM«rii:f4r'Tpifrr -rup’t^p MNL MIX (C2). Mi4-Kd|tl Xm4c rnirtc C 0i| btucsCem LA^tdropogtm geranii) Side oala poano {Bomtiotao ctotipendtUa),,^ Blue grama (Bouaetoua graciUa).^.... Piairio bcoow {Dromua kalwuQ^.,.^^ Canada wild rye (Efyorna canadansli} Little btucilciii (Sckaockjwimi aeaparfwm) Indian gran (SorghasMtm n$uau)........... Prairin dropa^ [SporoMm krtorottpit).., SeggaoUd nh/oero ’ • *•**•*«#•**•« a»e«M ••«••• o hi fasti 3*05^ -------------.MM------33.0% —........10 0% ■..MM........ 4-05^ -----------------------7.0% -----------------------39 0% o »»»e e— •» •»»»« • OftaC St John'i wort {Hypori Blue flag irit {tria atnkohr) Tall bladog itar {Uotria pycnostaachya)^ MBliaW).MM..M».MMM-M^»MM.M...M..M».0 1% Saggcftcd rMc^fOOff a^uare fctl. •MM.-MMM 3.05^ ..M..M..M* 1 .05^ ---------71ba. PLS —-----3at.PLS 11% -3.5% Gnat Wue lobeba {Lohoiio aiphiUtka)^ Monkey Bower (kimutua rthgona) M^m*oo**ws Wild bcrgaiaont {khnunh/iatukata) ^ Manh bcimy {FatBcularii caanadomit) Praine cuiquefotl {FotontiUa Mountain mifU Lfp^mawthtmam ftrgmimtm) Yellow concflowcr (Kafibida ptnnoh) ..m... Black-eyed luaan (Budhccka hirfa)..... Grccabeadad ermeflower (ffudbrclro heinhimO Giant Ooldemod {jSotkktgpgij^mlco)...........M...«... Pi44^U*f Goldcnrod {Sotkkago Stiff Gokkacod (SoLkhgo nguiii).*M..~.-.MM,MM..M..MM.M....MM.................- 3^% _________________0i% __________________0.1% M...MM.MM... MM.M—*-******** O' 2% 0 7% IM.M»»»«MM-M.M.».M..M 0.35^ ..m..72% ...m.5 5% 01% 05% 1.0% Pian'i Schedule Quanilyl Code Common Name ^*4 i • eI-•***••••••• •*••♦♦* *•* ' I 9 . ^ NKM >4 ^. Dolanical Name •Acer rutxvm ’htorthwoorf" Vtcff ssethofum Tall meadow naaiThottetrum daaycorpmt) Blue vervam (Verbeno hiuttata) -..m... Ifunwccd (Yarwmhfasctcwlaau) CuKui root iVeromtcatftvm sirginkwm) UoldcB Aiciandcrt {Ziito maroo)............ ►♦*•••# ea>aei4«ae«aaa 100% , *4. eaiaee* •12 6% 3 1 ABM ^P*f, Auiu»«« Bia/e ^ 8 RGB jBirch. R«ver Ctomp 4 SUA *Aah Summ4 1 SWO pak. Sv/ampWhiia _ I 8 BM5 j^BMS 'Spiuca. Black rw^ ^ ^uce. HW.li H4i _ ccr a tfoomoni ‘JoBotvetf fiotulo rugro_______________ *Fro%mua porwsyts'ontco 'SumnuT ^juertua baedht 3*1 .»! 4.44**«aM»**»4 •aae»e‘kee«*»»»»«»***e***^**** . .ea* •♦•a*, •^•••••eiee-a***13% 1.9% SurretUd rate/aert.. Mea«a««. M44 ••••*'♦ *#»-©•••••• ______________4»ba. bulk P.ra.1 gtouca^ns^j____________________ |rscaap/auca dansma_____________________ 3 1 0»^ S^Zce.^kckHiPt 41 HID jDogwood. R«d ------- 17 WKS ‘SnowbafiY. wnna ■....■•—ir. " • 'Picoogtanica doa^oto ^ iCo^s foncoo 'BohyT Symphonesfpoi attua «► >rvnM '’T’ l‘ % t5*flm •*>#« Hu ' Yf Cotton *fuwn 09 por €i jot not ttoM ^Utod ^11* I'I I I »^Wl II I I S 892J’00" C -----OT / <T----- 'T ' ---t-l—--X,___Li i y / 4/i> rM-< //. StHv^or fk»iierMc>rN-T?? (C^mcvr ? PcMA^*^ iAU^siiui^ ^ i Bonestroo gijj Rosene Anderlik & ^ I Associates Engineers & Architects "1 ! 7335 Wfsl Highwny 36 • St Pnul, MN 50113 Office. 651-636-4600 • Fax; 651-636-1311 wwwtioneitfoo com iswiisi'r O ' 0 ?005 c/ry OF ^^OA/o January 14,2005 Ms. Melanie Curlis Planner City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Re: 2618 Casco Point Road File No. 139-05-000 Plat No. 04-3052 Dear Melanie: Attached please find comments from Sherri Buss at our office regarding the restoration plan for 261 8 Casco Point Road. If you have any questions please call me at (651) 604-4863. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERUK & AS.SOCIATES, INC. Attachment Cc; Greg Oappa, City of Orono Mike GafVron, City of Orono • 5t. Paul. St. Cloud. Rochester, Willmar, MN • Milw.iukee. Wl • Chicago, IL Affirrri4«itvr Aclion/Fc|u^l Opf>uMun«iy rmjiloyer «incJ fmployrr Osarticil ^ i Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik& Associates Engineers & Architects Date: To: From: January 12, 20()5 Tom Kellogg Sherri Muss, M.L.A. Boncolroo, Ro«tn«, Anil«f1ili and Aaaoclataa, Inc. la an Affirmativa Acllon/I qual Opportunity t mployar and Cmployaa Oarnad Principala- OtIoO Itnnaatroo. P F •Marvlnl norvala. P F •(HarmH Cnoli. PF •Rntiorin Hcrumlr.M. P F • Jarry A fliNadan, PI • Marti A Manaon. P E Sanlor ConaullanIa: MobortW Roaarw. PE •JoaophC AndaHDi,PC • ncKarij C Turnar. P F • fVuaan M I iMirMn. 0 P A Aaaoclala Principala; HaiOiA (kKrton, PF • ftotjorl H Pfolfmln. PE •NlchaidW I cialnr. PI • David () I iialiula. F • Michaal T Hautniarwi. I* E • Imf K I Mild. PL •Kannirthp AiKlMaon. PE* Mark H MoKa, PL* Davtd A flonaalroo. M H A * Stdnny P WHIiamaon, P I . L !i • Agnea M Ming, M H A • Allan Hick Sclanidl, P L * Fhomaa W Polnraoii. PE* Jamaa M Maland. P F * MUaa B Janaan. P L * I fkavnl III, P E * Oaraal J I dgarinn, PC* lamaal Martmar, P E *ThnmaaA SyBio. PE *Sha(donJ Johnaon *Oaln A rWova. PE * llnmaa A Mouahar. P E * Mnbart J ()avfi;y. P L Officaa; SI Paul. Rt Cknid, Mtichnalnf and Witlmar. MN * MlhiraulUHi. Wl • CNcago. tt. Mraballa: arww tjormalrna corn Subject: Review of Restoration Plan for 2618 Casco Point Road I have reviewed Ihe Restoration Plan for 2618 Casco PoiiU Road, and have Uic following comments: The species selection for plantings and seed mix arc OK. The plan docs not indicate the source for the “native seed mix". 'I he source and locution should be specified, to ensure that seed hardy to our area is selected and planted. Seed should have been grown within 200 miles of Ihe Twin Citie.s, and preferably within 50 miles. Maintenance of the native seeding is critical to success, and ensuring that the seeded area docs not become a weed patch. The MnDOT Seeding Mumial 2(M)3 provides a good schedule for maintenance of areas that are seednl with native mixes. The City should require a maintenance plan for the seeding from the landowner, and require that the owner or his/lier contractor provide this maintenance. I have attached the pages from the MnDO r Manual for reference. Tree planting should include protection from deer and beavers (see note on plan that indicates that beavers arc at work in Ihe area). A cover crop is a good idea for native seeding. The MnDO f Manual also de.scribes appropriate cover crops to he included in native seed mixes, depending on the season tliat the seed is applied. Sceiling and planting procedures should generally follow the MnDOT standards, including removal of any noxious weeds before seeding or planting. 2335 IVosf Highway 36 * St Paul, MN 55113 • 6S1-636-4600 * Fax: 651-636-1311 Inc I* an Af fir mail vt Acliofi/rqual lorvala. PI • C»ww> M Ccioli. P t • Kobaft O. L llanaon. P i: JotephC •larhafill: tianw. UtiMifiK liaffwia. PE -RlchafclW Foatiif. PI • lad K I laid. PE*Ke*wa»IHP. lona^ioo. M H A • Sidney P WnWamwwi. P fi. N, Pt • IhomaaW PaUMaon, P fc • iamai R aavfil III. PI • iJaiael J I duaftcxi. P C • Shaiilon J Ji>hnaon • Dale A liniva. P t • llniiit. MN I. Wl • Chuumo. It Roid nd have ihc following lix”. '1 he source and location selected and planted. Seed s. and preferably williin 50 <1 ensuring that the seeded Manual 200.1 provitics a good VC mixes, llic (’ity should ncr, and require that the /c attached the pages from the ivcrs (see note (ui plan that .) r Manual also describes I, depiMiding on the .season that tie MnDOT staiularils, planting. Mtt/DOT Sri'itinii Mumitil 2003 (Pay.f 34) Maintenance Hcniiireniciits (Jciieral Seed Mixtures 240,250 and 280 Year I Muinlcnaiicc after Spring or Karly Summer Seeding: 1) Mowing during early Fall may be necessary if weed inlcstation or .shading becomes a piohlem. 2) Weed (-’oiitiol mowing .should help eoiitrol annual weeds. Spot spray tlu.stlc.s etc. :\) If plants arc growing slowly, you can apply fertilizer {20-10-10 analysis) .is nece.ssary over the top to iinjirove growth. Maintenance after l'’all or Dormant .SeciIIng: 1) Mowing ill May or June may be necessary if weed infe.slalion becomes a problem. 2) Weed Control -- mowing should help control annual weeds. Spot spray tliislles etc. I .one Term Maintenance: 1) Can mow 3 times per year as dc.sircd. 2) Spot spray weeds ns needed. General Seed Mixture.s 260 and 270 Year I 1) Provide water if necessary to aid cstabli.slunctit 2) Alter turl’grasses reach a height of 6 mches, initially mow to a height ol 2 to 3 inches I ,oitit Term 1) l•■^•rlili/.e ami water as needed. 2) Mow a minimum of once every 2 weeks. iNalive (Jrasji and Korb Mixtures (310,330,340,350 and 5B throuRh 28B) Year I K.sluhli.shineiit (spring .xeetliiig): 1) Prepare site - bate April - May. 2) Seal - May I - July 1. Muinleniinre: 1) Mow (6-8 inches) every 30 days after planting until September 30. 2) Weed Ctintrol - mowing should help control annual wee«ls. Spot .spray lhi.sllc,s etc. Ksiulilisliniciit (full seeding): 1) Prepare .site -1 ate Augu.st - early Septernlicr. 2) Seed - late September to freeze-up. Muintenaiice (fnihming sea.Mtii): 1) Mow (6-8 inches) once m May. June ami July. 2) Wee«l Coiiliol - mowing .should keep amiual wee«ls down. Spot .spi iy thusllcs etc. F.valiiation: 1) Cover en>p gmwing within 2 weeks of planting (except dormant plantings). 2) Seedlings spaced 1-6 mehes apart in drill rows 4600 • Fmm: 65l-6J6*f3f f Mit/DOT Seeding Manual 2003 (Page 35) 3) Native grass seedlings may only be 4-6 inches tail. 4) If there is a flush of growth from foxtail etc., mow as necessary. Year 2 Maintenance: 1) Mow (6-8 inches) one time between June I - August 15 before weeds set seed. 2) Weed Control - mowing should keep annual weeds down. Spot spray thistles etc. 3) Some sites may not require much maintenance the second year. Evaluation: 1) Cover crop will be gone unless winter wheat was used in a fall planting. 2) Grasses forming clumps 1-6 inches apart in drill rows, but still short. 3) Some flowers should be blooming (black-eyed Susans, bergamot etc.). 4) If there is a Hush of growth from foxtail etc., mow .site. Year 3 Maintenance: i) Mow only if necessary. 3) Weed Control - Spot .spray thistles, etc. 4) Sites usually do not require much maintenance the third year. Evaluation: I) Planting should begin looking like a prairie - tall grasses, flowers etc. Long-term Maintenance: 1) Weed Control - Spot .spray thi.stles etc. 2) Burning (3-S year rotation) alternate spring and fall if possible. 3) Haying (3-5 year rotation) late summer or early fall. Alternate with burning (may .substitute for burning). 4) Burning two years in a row will really “dean up" rough-looking sites. I r i \ VIXHil AI ION RESTORA TION PLAN Al'I'ROVAL Reference the nitnclied plan by Markell Ijiberee T)csign Group dated December 22, 2004 for 2618 Casco Roiiit Road, Wayzata, MN The City of Orono hereby approved the above referenced plan subject to the following addilioniil conditions; 1. 2. 3. 4. 'Ilic Black Hills Spruce trees propose'.* for the property’s eastern “point" sliall be 12’ in height rather than 8 ’ ns proposed; and All of the attached City lutginecr recommendations shall be met; and No trees shall be replaced by the Vogstroms on the lissen’s property; and. The trees proposed on the City right-of-way shall be located further cast to be within the Vogstroms’ property or as close as feasible to the property line. THIS A(iKF.KIMKNT and KKliRASF. made and entered into tins day of . 2005 by and between the City ol (Jrono, a municipal coipoiatirm located in the (bounty of Hennepin, Stale o(‘ Minnesota (hereinalter relened to as ('ily of Orono) and liric and lilizalxrth Vogstrom, owners of the properly at 2618 Casco Point R(»ad, Way/ata, MN (hercinaner referred to as the Vogsiroms). In consideration of the covenants contained herein, and in consideration of the Vogstrom ’s agreement to restore vegetation, on their property and adjacent City ol’Orono pro|)erty, as shown on the Vegetation Kesloralion Plan attached as Hxhibil A to this document, to replace trees and undergrowth removed on the Vogstroms ’ properly in violation of City Codes and on adjacent properly within the City limits of the City of Orono, the parties agree as follows: I. I he legal description of the Vogsirom property is ns follows: North 80 lect of Itlock 3, Winships Subilivision of l.<U I, Spring Park Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hercinafler, the Property) 2. This AtiKPPlMPNT resolves Ihe dispute related to the unnuthori/ed removal of trees and vegetation from the Properly within 75 ’ of the shoreline of l ake Minnetonka and on adjacent City of Orono properly. 3. The (.'ily of Orono agrees to diseonliiiue pursuit of legal action against the Vogsiroms related to the unauthori/ed removal of trees and vegetation clear eulting within 75 ’ of Ihe .shoreline of Take Minnetonka, in e.xehange for Ihe Vogsiroms and/or their succe.ssors and assigns agreement to plant and maintain the trees, shrubs and groundcovers .set out in the Vegetation Kesloralion Plan which is attached as Pixliibit A to this document. The trees and other plantings shall be planted as .st)on as practicable, but in no ease shall a Certificate of Occupancy be issued until Ihe Vegetation Restoration Plan has been fully executed. d. The City of Orono may enter the Property to in.speel the planting, in order to determine that the trees, sbrubs and groundcovers are planted itt accordance with Ihe Vegetation Re.storation Plan. 5. I he Vog.stroms and their .succe.s.sors and n.s.sign.s shall allow an annual inspection by the (’ily of Orono to determine that the trees, shrubs and groundcovers arc growing,, anti the Vogstroms anti then succe.s.stirs anti assigns shall replant any trees, shrubs tn grounticoveis that are tleatl t>r tlying, and shall use best efforts to facilitate the life anti giowth t>l the tiees, shrults and grt)untlct)vers. Phis retpiirement shall ettniinue in effect until each of Ihe trees has reached a diameter t»f six inches, ta 19 inches in ciicianlerence, at a ptiint measuretl three feet abt)ve the ground. 6. I'hc Vogstroms and their successors and assigns shall not trim any of the parts of tlic trees or shrubs, or remove any of the trees or shrubs, without City of Orono approval. This AORRIiMliN T shall remain in elTcct until both parties agree to amend or terminate this AfiRHIiMRNT. This ACiRERMHN'f may be enforced by injunctive relief in the courts of the State of Minnesota. 8. riiis AORHHMItN'f may be filed against the Property, 'flic Vogstroms agree to obtain the con.sent of any other holders of interests in the Property in order to allow this ACiRERMHN'f and RI-I.EASE to be fded. I'or the City of Orono For the Vog.strom.s Ronald J. Moorse City Admini.strator Eric J. Vogstrom Idizabeth A. Vog.strom Exhibit F Dale Application Received: 08-IK-04 Dale Application Complete: 09-13-04 120-Day Review I'erlod Kxtended: 03-10-05 DEQUES 1 EOR COUNCIL ACTION Date:January 4, 2005 Item No. DcparlmenI Approval: Name: Melanie Curtis . Title: City Planner Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: Item Description: //04-3052 - Firic Vogstrom 2618 Ca.sco Point Road Variances /oning District: Lot Area: l.ot Width: I.K-IC, One F:imily Lakeshorc Residential, 0.5 acrc/100’ 0.47acrc/20.56l s.f. 100’ parallel to the shore & 80’ @ 75’ setback List of Exhibits: A. Rcvi.sc(l Survey dated 12-21 -04 U, Revised F'loor IMans and lilevations C. ('oiineil Memo from 12-07-04 D. Drall Council Minutes from 12-07-04 Application Summary: This application was tabled at your December 1.3“' meeting in order to provide the applicant a final opportunity to redesign the proposal to rellect a 1,500 s.f. maximum building footprint and mitiinial as.soeialcd hardcover. I'he applicant has submitted a revi.sed plan; the footprint was reduced, one parking stall removed from llie plan and now the applicant is proposing a variance for 31.7% hardcover within the 75’-250’ setback /.one. 'I'he new design is reilueed from 1,609 s.f to a 1,499 s.f building footprint (including a home, 2-car attached garage, and deck) with a total of 2,432 s.f or 31.7% hardcover in the 75’-250’ zone. 'I’he lloor plans and elevation views submitted appear to match the proposed footprint on the survey and staff feels that this recent proposal is responsive to the ('ouncil’s direction. Flaniiing (’ommission Kccommciidatioii On November 15, 2004, Planning C’ommission voted 5-2 (dissenting (.’ommissioners Fritzlcr and Jurgens felt additional hardeovci reductions were warranted) to recommend a|)proval of a variance within the 75’-250’ zone for 36.8% hardcover or 2,824 s.t. and an average lake setback variance to encroach 5’ into the average lake .setback in conjunction with laiulscape restoration plan to ire approveil. The I’lanning C’ommi.ssion has not reviewed the most recent submittal. Plaiiiiing .Slaff Kecoiiimemlaiioii Alih(»ugh the majority of the Planning Commi.ssion eonchuled that the large 0-75’ area and relatively small 75’- 250’ aiea is a hard.ship to the property. C'ouned should discuss the merits of this re(|iie.st and roach a conclusion as to what level ol hardcover is appropriate to the site. The applicant has proposed a 1,499 s.f. footprint with an attached 2-stall garage and staff feels that he has proposed a plan that meets the direction of the Council. Therefore, Planning Staff recommends approval of the hardcover variance request for 31.7% hardcover within the 75 ’-25()’ .setback as well as the average lakcshorc setback variance. Restoration Plan The applicant has provided a revised restoration plan which appears to addrc.ss a majority of staffs concerns. We will provide a full review for you at your next meeting. Council Action Requested Options include: 1. Accept the current plan and direct Staff to drafl a rc.solution reflecting Council ’s action for adoption at your January 24"' meeting; or 2. Reject the current plan and again provide the applicant with guidance. j /'I St h*r<t« Jt:) V. r '-v \5 89 ’^J’00"l E \ —2\1.W-- . / ................. Jsiorth Unf of Block ,<5. Winships \Subd. of Lot /, SpNng Park 2nd Addition 'f Spruce ^tump ; c'ore I .'«• ft^___^ ^ ■. Ij7 24'' Oak htump o • T-Msu>ni win / 12 “ f^cc : I 5.; ft il f2 “:0al 0^ m. 7 / ^ ^ . f Fa) i* '■ *» i ^ p A / / m7^' 4 “ Spruce Stump . •i5*,5p/'wce V / I* O) BENCHMARK .40P OF IRON 944.10 y I / 6“ Spruce Tree stump location shown as per client / not field verified \ ^ ^ O' / <■ © ^ . tv' ® , r^' / / rou*^n rPnjtimi'* ?/. re s! 8^j!oo" e >^7 / 14- EimYv'^pfX^ ^o± 2 “ Fin free s locatk os pet not fii • \i / A\ A /L t V W* |.» > W w - I SITBACX (C:~.CL2 0;Si) C-TF 75-;£-:’ ryrr>;r: =AA~cr->-?. r-' A. HcU22 L=r-Trie:!: ♦##% 3. C2.155 • • C CrWr-vay X X D. Sicr^iix X X c. Pstic/Dcck X X r. Lanicaps Underlain By Plastic X X X C. Other AtM.n»»u • TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA [N ZONE ♦ B ____X ICO PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ______________ * L sag^h VTuSh X X X B. Garage C. Drive\v*ay X X D. SIdr.vaik X X E PaticADeck X X r. Landscaae Underiaai By Plasrlc C. C*er TOTAL H-AROCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY ARS.A IN ZONE •*■ B ____X ICO -0* II //^A ->o 7l^7> 'llB> iX'i- im 'hir\ <5.. 5.7 c Tw«« a r S.?. SJ“. 5*^ • s -w«« • C s -•w»* • S.r. S.F. S.r. S.F. S ^ _ S.FT ! ~ % A B i451_i —s:?. s;f. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SJ. S.F. S.F. SJ^. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. • S.F. A S.F.B * 4 r i %■■■ im-i- 6TP4et eUX4KriOKl L, .^..,..<ifc iiMi HoM^n BueMMTfoM ..V5Y ms. WmKM i> p ji '4 tvji V VI $jr 43 tsrv: 5VU a iA Vi 4V u n *A! *»5t^ Vi v: VXV154 vvy^^ 4>5i:5 ^AviVvvi ^V*3(V mmmm Kvi Vi Si vivtw wv vi A v).sivns-^ii|j : ^ Si v: Vi !svr. vivi Vi vivi^vivi V s> 5i ^uuvivi: w vi^ viVlv^vi vivivi Si v^vi si v- v liviiiA'^ ssvivi sivlViv:^ Visi iV*SSVSViVvisisisisi-visisisivivivt IV si Vi Vi Vi li Si viviViVi:ijiviviviv^vlsi Vi viv Vi VI vrvivv-s Wt V*T« Vi Si A Vi VI Vi 5S .pviSi-iWVl V^SilSViSiWVtS? ViViViVlviV^ViVi Vtjp VlSiVlSl^ Vi'si Si S3^ vv^vivv sivivivicss Si visSViviv: V15S Ass A Vi^Si Si vaesiviilviviUrAviVivSvi w Si A - (^VTH eiSVATItlsl k>.Tr.-.w% ii*v. p«^f IW1-'»^».w»» ' ’. -. • . ■ V . ‘*- ■" -^ . ’ ‘' '-'l T. •> _ __: IAK( eij^AtloM ■ i;. BEDROOM s L-* ^ r _ — 1 a; -1 .....i------ SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1502 sqft ilUttUi FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1497 sqft EAHiE.it O Date Application Hcceived: 08-18-04 Date Application C.'oiiipictc: 09-13-04 120-Day Review Period Extended: 03-10-05 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: December 7,2004 Hem No. Department Approval: . Name: Melanie ('urtis 4 |j /\ Title: City Planner Admiiiislnitor Approval:Agenda Section: Item Description: #04-*052 - Eric Vog.strom - 2618 Ca.sco Point Road - Variances Zoning District: Lot Area: l.ot Width: I.R-IC, One Family Lakeshore Residential, 0.5 acre/100’ 0.47 acrc/20,561 s.f. 100’ parallel to the .shore & 80’ @ 75’ .setback last of Eihibifs: A - Revised Plans 12-05-04 B-Council Action Notice 12-02-04 C -- Council Memo 1 1-17-04 D - Review Period It.xtension 12-01-04 H - Restoration Plan .StatT Review Letter 12-08-04 Application Summary: This application was tabled at your November 22"*' meeting in order to provide the applicant with an opportunity to redesign the proposal lo reduce or eliminate the variances requested. At that time Council directed the applicant to redesign the proposal to include a 1,500 s.f. building footprint and the appropriate hardcover to support that home. Upon receipt of this requested plan the Council would determine the appropriate level of hardcover variance. The applicant has submitted a revised jilan; the home was slightly redesigned and the applicant is now proposing a sli}ihtly lesser variance than the 36.8% hardcover within the 75’-250* setback zone which was proposed previously. I he new design is reduced from 1,884 s.l. to a 1,669 s.f building footprint (including a home, .3-car attached garage, and deck) with a total of 36.0% hardcover in the 75’-250’ zone, fhe new design proposes only a 0.8% hardcover reduction from the previous proposal. Staff feels that the proposal is not responsive to the ('ouncil’s direction, and is resulting in excessive staff time being spent on the application. IManning Cummissiuii Rveoiiiiiiemiutiou On November 15, 2004, I’lannmg Commi.ssion voted 5-2 (dissenting Commissioners Fritzler and Jurgens felt additional hardcovei reductions were warranted) to recommend approval of a variance within the 75’-250' zone for 36.8% hardcover or 2,824 s.l. and an average lake setback variance to encroach 5 ’ into the average lake setback in conjunction with land.sca|K* restoration plan to be approved, flic Planning Commission hits net reviewed the most recent submittal. Plaoning Staff RecomnicndHtion Although the majority of the Planning Commission concluded that the large 0-75’ area and relatively small 75’- 250’ area is a hardship to tlie property; StalT is not convinced that the level of 36.8% or even 36% is warranted for this specific rebuild. Council should discuss the merits of this request and reach a conclusion as to what level of hardcover is appropriate to the site. Staff also feels that Council should review this proposal as a “footprint ” rather than a rambler or two-story, as either could be constructed on this property. Planning Department Staff continues to recommend approval of the average lakcshore setback variance. Staff believes that the size of the 75’-250 ’ zone (7,673 s.f.) which at 25% would allow only 1,918 s.f. of hardcover, is an inlicrcnt hards.hip. fhe city has generally established tliat for very small lots, the minimum reasonable garage/house footprint is 1,500 s.f.. It is likely impossible to construct a 1,500 s.f. house on this site within the 25% limit. I hcrefore staff will conceptually support a 1,500 s.f. home with the minimal decks, sidewalk and driveway needed to support it, but we think this can be done in the range of 30% hardcover, not 36%. We are not convinced that tlie 3'*’ garage stall is necessary. Council Action Requested Options include: 1. Accept the current plan and direct Staff to draft a re.solution reflecting Council ’s action for adoption at your January meeting; or 2. Reject the current plan and again provide the applicant with guidance; or 3. Other. ^jwl E • # ^ ■ >Vor//» of Block ,S. Winships ‘Subd. of Lot f. Sptini Park 2nd Addition > > : .»!•» ;• 11* ••• IDI.IMTI M Ktt.yiMid CO. • M Ml <!■■■ ■>! »r>**««» lout tioms ** ••• fulfil »—«MH a. *••••»»>»“• t*m m«M> «••> »m ■ ■■■■HwlWH »«•■ I»ti « »• m4*a >t If-f: ■ W>«II -JM*-r» itTTi U,a»W» *• »••* •k** « k< > ^tn ] ^ ■«»« » A<» * 4«««» l«—« MM ••• J ' ‘ IwMmI' Ji^M **•»*»«••••« M»t i« «k — Ii 1^1 '<*>«•»«• ^>« V Mfai- wUi. •>!»«<« •»« M«— r-» |ll\ ISi‘* l»i«f I t. •—• M— ■«« «» I V*« ^ *•-' • \M •«* •« m t *•» •• »• »•»•*» ••• «# •• *^ •» k»«' • !*• m»M«« |_2 »JW* •*• •'• ••«. »*-* • • '•»* r»M k»M •••'••a .« k«« w •*•««•• ..««« ••*«»>• M«M .« a-«4 • »«•«•«« M *•»••!••*• •*■«• •• !• I «>. mmt «••.»* .1 ««aMt mf'- —«•*••• ■•••»• ( ‘aaaf •«•••»•«»•• • »■#»*»■ *i « ••*<-«-.<•<•»• IM.ItWi Vr «M »«4 M *4 •« k. Mi« ^ •« m •• *• • w»4»«.« « » W4. ■ ••• » •»« 1 .*.• •c* ••••MM' .. aaaiw’^.M-** ^j,*.*.**^ | <•.*>» M W* M •• ... «r •• •»»—•. •. •• « •» ••• t« • .»• * .*«• •••» ••-• a* *M>*» »».*■• |»a*. k ..• ♦«• «ff». •■ r • • M* • .k »••••♦« .M -a* M M> •* iw ... •»*. ik.*. *«■.-*’ » •» ».»»■•» r*. .k I .• •• .^ •• «»•(.• IM* •MM.Mkkk*-.. 4kw !«•« «k k* •!«**■•%#•• *••«■■••• k* M* w k« *M wa.‘V.'r^ViT7ii.”( M w»| ♦Mal.’l «•—i « ^ M*.-* m>m I kk t — » I—k.k».». I'fM Ml > Ma IM •< Mi «HM «< M«MMMPRa'OSlD LLLVAVONS rv^ <9 /CUMMAOV • M/ 5<l OAMAcr nom • »5f /0 iow noa/t • 94J 90 _ _ mmitAm tat twtn 4S iw«w • #44 ................. ... _ .......................................................— —• “* — — — /nfy^yp — — — — — — --a.-. — J- — — -. — /¥Ur f34 i<2 motoat mAut tot M3 — manisio omvf tot M /£ Point \ ) / TlooT r%=i_ —-«=--- (UnifTiprovcd) ./ //. IteiV ' , 'I-*/ / " s ttiiw: iTiiJi Orw /Vo 04oeja > '-I ■■“mmm -SiWiSW'^■f yy^i^:('-.'y‘ i^ .if i- ■ •>-5-- rf^A i r'/v^ , Vogu« HoiiMs. Inc Vogstrom RMid«nce Casco Point Road : . rtf. -mm t'/ V.' :v m 1^ J k * '^^^ m SI It?-- tPA af ■:. iff • ^^^^^^^^^^^^K^^^0f0^0000l/000j^00A0000jy^00j00j'4^0* ^4^»00f *000^00000 00000000 0000000000 *00000 0000 **0**it^i**^*t i 1 1 B1 LAKE VIEW ■*r« . k r. 0. iK'Ji .JAl f. '‘iA '■ > . L. m S>i«V5V5i5l^ «WP«5ir¥«Wft»SR StfiKWfl s2» < L -V - • ^ . .^r- 7 ► U-.r.*x tSi < FIRST FLOOR PLAN 986 sq f1 ■< H6: m. SECOND FLOOR PLAN 891 sqft BCHIBIT MINUTES OK THE OKONO CITY COUNCIL MEE'I INC Monday, December 13, 2004 7:00 o'clock p.iii. 9. #04-3052 ERIC VOCSTROM, 2618 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARIANCES Eric Vogsirom, Applicant, and Todd Phelps, Attomey-at-Law, were present. Curtis noted this application was tabled at the November 22“* City Council meeting,, with the applicant being requested to redesign the proposal to reduce or eliminate the variances rccpiested. The applicant was directed to redesign the pro|M>sal to include a maximum 1,500 square fool building footprint and the appropriate hardcover to serve that home, riic applicant has submitted a rcviscrl design, with the home proposed to be two-story residence with a 1,699 building footprint, a tliree-car attached garage and deck. The applicant is now proposing .34.5 percent hardcover within the 75’-250* /one, which is a 2.3 percent trr 176 square foot hardcover reduction from the previous proposal. StalT feels the pruposid does not re.spond fully to Cr)uncirs direction. Although the majority of the Planning Commission concluded that the large 0-75’ /one and relatively small 75’-250’ /one is a hardship to the property. Stall'feels that the 34.5 percent hardcover is not warranted for this lot. Staff continues to recommend approval of the average lake.shore .setback variance. Staff believes that the si/e of the 75’-250’ zone, which, at 25 percent would allow only 1 ,918 square feet of hardcover, is an inherent hardship. The C’ity has geucially established that for very small lots the minimum reu.sunuble garage/housc footprint is 1,500 square feet, it is likely impossible to construct a 1,500 scpiare f»»ot house on this site within the 25 percent limit. Therefore, StalT will conceptually support a 1,500 square foot home with minimal decks, sidewalk and driveway needed to support it, but .Stafl'feels this can be done in the range of 30 percent hardcover, not 36 percent. Slaffis not convinced that the third garage stall is necessary. ('uilis stated a letter from received twlay from Timothy Keane, attorney for the applicant, and has been distributed to the Council. MINUTKS OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, December 13, 2004 7:00 o’clock p.m. Gaffron addressed (lie Ci'y Council concerning the size of the house and footprint. GalTron stated the lot is sloped towauis the lake and has approximately an 8-foot rlifferencc from the lakeside of the proposed house to the street side of the proposed hou.se, would ideally accommodate a walk ­ out and a two and a half story house without exceeding any height limit.s and without excess grading. Gaffron stated a footprint of 1,500 square feet with a two-.stall garage could be constructed. If the applicant would like to retain the three-car garage, the first story coidd be reduced by 200 square feet, for a final square footage of4,700 square feet. Gaffron indicated the shape of this lot lends itself to a home up to 55-60’ in width and also allows for a home to be angled so that it takes the best advantage of lake views. Additionally, the home could be placed with the garage at the 30 ’ minimum setback from the road to minimize driveway hardcover. The additional area of 0-75’ zone that is non-contiguous is a benefit to this property but cannot be considered as creating a hardship situation. No hardcover credit should be accrued to this excess lakcshore square footage. Sansevere inquired why the applicant is so reluctant to agree to 1,500. Sansevere noted he personally would not agree to anything above 1,500. Vogstrom stated he is unclear about some of the items in StalFs report. Vogstrom indicated page three of the memorandum lists a couple of properties that are smaller than his lot, both of which were granted a larger footprint. Vogstrom pointed out part of the basis for tlic approval on those two properties was the fact that they are located on a busy road. Vogstrom noted his property is al.so located on u very busy road. Vogstrom stated he nK*ets all required setbacks, with the house being located 85’ from the lake, and that he is requesting the additional hardcover to accommodate a third stall on the garage. Vogstrom indicated he has reduced the size of the proposed residence in order to liave a three-.stall garage. Vog.stroni stated he is not sure how the city planner arrived at the square fcMitage for the house. MINUTES OF rilE ORONO Cn Y COUNCIL MEKi'lNC; Monday, December 13, 2004 7:00 o*cl<Kk p.m. nol meeting the optimum shape should he allowed excess hardct)vei , which iianslalcs to .m automatic variance level Tor almost all existing lots. Galtron indicated Item .1A illustrates the loolprints that were allowed in the jtasl six years lor various pr«»perties given their lot aiea and the amount of the building pad located within the 75 ’- 250 ’ area and the approved hardcover. Ciailron staled based t)ii Irxhibils 3H and 3(’, in his opinion the Switz applieation is an anomaly and is nol consistent with llie building footprint. typically granted by the City. GalTron indicated he di.sagiees with the concept that the peninsula found on the Vogsirom lot should be a factor in determining the amount of hardcover Ilia*, should he allowed on this lot. Gal Iron indicated the Switz lot is located t)n a much busier road than the Vogsirom properly and that hardships two and four do nol apply to the Vogs • )m property. Galtron elated approval of hardcover at 34.5 percent would nol be consi.sleni with past approvals by the Couiuvl. Oaffron pointed out :l:e hardcover rcdiicliotis being projiused by the iipplicant are primarily being reduced within the city right-of-way, whicit is where the majority of the exi.sting driveway ;* located. CialTr«)ti n«)led 270 srpiare feel of hardcover is located within the right -of-way and not on the properly. Gaffron .staled |{xhihil 3A provide.'- information for the last six years for lot area, existing and approved 75 ’-250 ’ zones, and lot coverage. Galtron staled properties tliai are sli^.I.’ly bigger have received n slightly biggei footpiinl but nol as much hardcover. (iafiVon sialeil an average is 30 peiceni aiul that I5(X) sipiare feel in his opinion is appropriate for this lot. .Sansevere inquired whether the City is iKiiig consi.slent with the l,5(M) sqn.ire feet KHpiiienieni (ialli ’*. ..lilted the applicant feels two applications were treated tiiflerently in the past year Uiat were nol consistent with the City's past piactice. (i.ilVion slat :.! the «|ue.siion is wfiethei tlui.se ■ihoiild be looked at as a precedent or whelher they should be eonsulereil .inomalics. 4 MINUTES OF TIIK ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, December 13,2004 7:00 o’clock p.m. Murphy Gaffron stated in his perspective the Switz application was an anomaly, with the I,offler application having an issue with location of the house toward the street reducing lake views and causing a tunnel effect. Gaffron indicated the (|ucslion is what si/e footprint is appropriate for any given lot and that tiie hardcover should not be based upon the 1,500 square feet. Vogstrom stated with his first proposal at 57.8 percent hardcover, he was at the 15 percent structural coverage. Vogstrom commented the houses on Shadywood arc large and look out of place with the neighborhood and that the hou.se he is proposing i. not out of character with the rest of this neightx)rhoo<i. Vog.sirom sfatetl he is asking for the additional hardcover to allow foi a third stall on the garage. .Sansevere inquired what type of house the applicant is considering constructing on this lot and what the actual square footage of the proposed residence would bo. Sansevere noted the applicant could build living space above the garage. Vogstrom indicated there would be 1000 square feet on the first level, 1000 square feet for the basement, and 1000 for *hc second level, which amounts to 3,500 square feet. Vogstrom indicated he has reduced the si/e of the house by 185 square feet but would still like to maintain the fhrce cai garage. •Sanseveie noted the applicant was dialled to reduce the f(M>tprinl to 1,500 square feet. Sansevere c*mimenled he stdl is puz/lcd by the applicant ’s reluctance to reduce the size of ilie house to 1,500 square feet, especially if space is added above the garage. Vogsiro:u staled a 1,000 square fool house is not extravagant and that the extra square footage is for a three-stall garage. Vog.sUom slated he iU»es not feel the hou.se can k* reduced any further. San.severe requested Staff recap what the applicant is entitled to on this lot. MINUTES OF TIIK ORONO CI'I'Y COUNCIL MKKTINC; Monday, December 13, 2004 7:00 o'clock p.m. GiinVoii Klnlcd lol coverage as defined hy City Code is 15 percenl, which is 2,100 s(|iiarc fed for Ihis lol. (Jaffron slated from a hardcover perspective the applicant is allowed 1,918 .square feel of hardcover. Ajiproxiiiialely 600 srpiare feet is re(|iiired for a rlriveway, sidewalk, and deck, which would bring the hardcover to approximately 32 percent with a 1,500 square Idol fiKilprinl. Vogstroin indicated it is his underslanding he is allowed a 1,500 .sipiare ftM)t footprint for a lol of record. Vogstroin .staled in his opinion Casco I'oint Road is a busier road and that his lol does constitute a hardship. Harrctt staled the 1,500 .square feel is the amount that the Council will vary up to but it docs not mean that the applicant is allowed to exceed the 1,500 scpinre feel. Moorsc stated 25 percent hardcover is what the ordinance allows, which is approximately 1,900 square feet. M(Hir.sc .staled if the applicant is allowed 600 .square fed for a driveway, 100 square feel for a sidewalk, and 100 square feet for a deck, the remaining hardcover would be approximately 1,100 square fool. Moor.se staled a variance would be required to allow the additional hardcover. VoR.slrom indicated it is his un'lcrstanding that most people gel a 1,500 squaie fool fooiin inl. (iaITroii noted there is a significant number ofluiuses that have been built that arc less than 1,500 scpiare feel. Saiiseveie staled at the last meeting the Council felt the applicant should be allowed |,5(.K) s<|uarc feel rather than the I,IKK) sipiare feel. Sanscvcrc indicated the 1,500 square feel is fair and that the applicant should not be held to the 25 peicent hardcover. 1 odd Phelps, I eonard, Siieel aiul Dcinard. slated there appears to be some precedent where the City has approved at least two other ca.ses that aie similar to this aiqilicalioii which meri fuilhcr MINiriKS OI<' IIIIO OKONO ciTY roiJNrii, MF.F/riNr; Mondiiy, IK'ci'nihcr 1.1, 2004 7:00 o’clock exploration <»n the applicant's part. PIicIps stated lie would like the opportunity to do n further detailed nnniysi.s of the two cn.sc.s citcrl in the mcmoiandnin as well as some other properties. Sansevere in<|iiired whether the applicant is askinj' for his application to be tabled. Phelps indicated he would like the applicant'.s application be approvetl tonipjit, hot in liijhl of (SanVon's comment.s, if the (’ooncil plans to deny the application, he would like to do further research. Peterson iiupiired whether the applicant would like to table the application. Phelps stated the applicant would like to h.ive hi.s application apjnoved fonipht, hut in the alternative, to table the application to allow the applicant to resjiond tr* the comments by the C'lty Planner. Phelps stated one ksue that has not been di.sciisse*l tonipht is the merits of this particular application. Phelps stated the letter from Timothy Keane responds to each of ttu* hardship re(|uirements set forth itl the Orono City (!<ule. Phelps statcil the discu.ssion should center on the harilship crileiia outlined in M..S. 462.1.S5 and the Orono (’ity (‘ode. Phelps indicated in his opinion this is a unique lot and that there are circumstances that merit the ^raiitiiif' of a variance. Phelp.s indicated the applicant has lieen attempting to woik with i ic City on rievelopinp, this lot and is not eircumventinp the direction of the Council. Sansevere stated at the Inst meeting a c.oorl point was marie concerning haidcover in that the likelihood for riinoil has been increased wit'i dit* removal of the trees. Phelps mdicaterl the applicant is aprccahle to re.stoie the Vvp.ctalion on this lot. lint that in his opinion it should he consuleietl as a .sepaiate issue. .Sansrwere stated the lemoval ofthc trees does impact the nnudf S.in.scveic noted Council rlirl not have nn o|)poituiiity to leview the letter liom the itlomey piior to tmiipht's meeting. Vogstrrtm stateil he would like to get the issues resolved. Peterson inquired whether the applicant would like his application tahlerl. MINUTKS OF THE ORONO CI'I'Y COUNCIL MEETING Monday, December 13,20U4 7:00 o’clock |t.ni. Vogsiroin amimciUed il appears Ihc Council is set on a maximum 1,500 square fool footprint. which he is not happy with. Sansevere iiulicated he is not willing to approve anything in excess of 1,500 square feet. I'etcrson indicolcd she ul.so is in support of a inaxiimim 1,500 square foot foolprinl. While staled he is not going lo lake two extreme ca.ses and say that is the norm but that the City needs to look at the overall picture. White slated the City has lo he consistent as much as possible when dealing with this type of application and that he would not support any deviation from what the City has consistently approved in the pa.sl. Vogsirom staled in his view he is not con.strueling an enormous hou.se and that the 1,500 square foot is the minimum the City allows. Vogstrom stated his lot consists of 20,500 square feel and that in his ojiinion the ma jority of Ihc 1,500 square fool footprints arc on lots that arc only 10,000 .square feel. Sansevere noted StalThas not been convinccil that there is a hard.ship and that he relies heavily on St.iir.s recommendations in ca.ses like this. .Sansevere slated Ihc applicant docs have the right to continue to pursue this application if that is his desire. Vogstrom noted that (ialTron was o|iposed lo the Swii/. application. .Sansevere staled he docs not recall the Switz situation. I'elcr.son si...ed the .Switz hou.se is localetl on .ShailywiHKl. Fr ierson staled she would prefer construction not be commenced on this lot until the trees are replaced and growing. Vogstiom noted he has submitted a re.sloralion plan. Vogsirom iiulicated a majority of the trees were located m the 75’-2.5()’ zone. Vogstrom stated a mistake was made and that he is attempting to re.sloie the ptojicily. Murjiliy si.iied he .sug{*esied at the last meeting that this application be tabled to allow a plan to be arrived at that meets SlalVs approval, which has not Iven ilone. Murphy noletl be is not in i MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, December 13, 2004 7:00 o ’clock p.m. support of the 1,500 square foot footprint. Murphy stated in his view a great deal of research has been done by the applicant and a great amount of effort has been put forth by Staff. Murphy indicated in light of the research and work that has been done on this matter, the application should move forward. Peterson inquired whether the applicant would like his application be tabled. Vogslrom .stated he could live with the 1,500 square feet. Barbara IZsscn, 2648 Casco Point Road, stated the removal of the trees ha.*: not enhanced the view of the neighborhood, noting that the trees that were removed on their lot were very mature trees and cannot be replaced in their lifetime. Sansevere inijuired how many trees the E.sscns lost. Essen indicated they lost two mature trees. Peterson inquired whether the applicant would like his application table. Vogstrom indicated he does not want his application to be tabled. McMillan stated she would like some calculations for hardcover on the 1,500 square foot footprint, with the decision being up to the applicant on what size house he would like and whether he would like a two-stall or a three-stall garage. Gaffron noted a resolution was adopted by the City listing the minimum standards for a driveway. Barrett staled if the Council is going to deny the application, a denial re.solution would need to be draded. Peter.son noted if the application is denied, the applicant cannot submit a new application for six months. GalTron stated the ap|ilicant still needs some variances at 1,500 square feet. Gaffron stated the denial resolution would deny the request as presently proposed and tliat if the applicant submits a t > MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, December 13,2004 7:00 o'clock p.m. plan that is difTcrent from what was previously proposed, that could be treated as a separate application prior to the six months. Gaffron stated the denial resolution would come before the Council at their January lO"' meeting. Murphy inquired if the application is denied tonight, whether Vogstrom would be able to come back with another application or whether he would need to wait six months. Barrett stated if a majority of the Council agreed to reconsider in January, u new application could be heard at that time. Murphy conunented that the applicant and Council could now be rushing on this application given the fact that the exact hardcover numbers have not yet been determined. Gannn stated the Council docs have the option to table the application and give clear direction to the applicant on what hardcover numbers they would like the applicant to adhere to. Gaffron stated that would give the Council the opportunity to see the exact plan the applicant is proposing. Vogstrom requested the Council act on the first resolution. Vogstrom stated he is willing to continue to work with staff and reduce the garage down to two stalls. Jefflisscn, 2648 Casco Point Road, stated it was his understanding the recommendation of the Planning Commission for 36 percent was conditioned upon t!ie tree restoration plan being approved by the City, lissen stated there docs not appear to be clear approval of a restoration plan. Gaffron stated Staff has reviewed the restoration plan submitted by the applicant and sent a letter, which is lixhibit li, listing some additional items that Staff feels are iiece.ssuiy to make the plan acceptable. GaiTron stated the letter went out last week but no response has been received. Vogstrom stated he received the letter last Friday and that he plans to have the revi.sed plan to Staff by the 22™ MINUTKSOFTIIE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, December 13,2004 7:00 o’clock p.m. Murphy staled in his view this application should be denied tonight and that the applicant be given specific direction on what the 1,500 square feet means. Gnffron stated if the applicant comes in with a request for a different footprint and hardcover variance, the Council could determine that it is a new application and the applicant woidd not need to wait the six months. Gaffron noted the new application would need to go back before the Planning Commission. Peterson inquired whether the building permit would be held until the restoration plan is implemented. Barrett slated those are two separate issues. Vogstrom slated he would be willing to sign an agreement sayi.ig that a certificate of occupancy would not be issued until the restoration plan is approved. Murphy inquired what steps the applicant is taking to address the lost trees on the F.ssen property. Vogstrom indicated he has spoken with the fissens a number of times and that it is his understanding they arc agreeable with the restoration plan. Murphy moved, White .seconded, to deny Application #.3052, Eric Vogstrom, 2018 Casco Point Road, with the understanding that the applicant can submit a new application prior to six months provided he is requesting a different hardcover variance. NO VOTE TAKEN. Barrett inquired whether a 1,500 square foot plan woidd be considered a new application. Gaffron slate-J if the applicant comes in with a revised plan before December 22"^, it would be brought back before the Council in January. McMillan inquired why tabling is not an option. Peterson stated the application could be tabled if the applicant requests it. Murphy staled tlie applicjinl has indicated three times that he docs not wish to table it. V MINUTES OF THE OKONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, December 13,2004 7:00 o'clock p.m. Vogstrom requested his Application be tabled. Peterson moved, Sansevere .econded, to table Application #3052,3052 Eric Vugstrom, 2918 Casco Point R-iad. Murphy withdrew his motion to deny the application. Moorsc stated if the motion is to table the application, prior to the next Council meeting the Applicant should submit a revised plan depicting a 1,500 square fmn footprint. Moor.se suggested a deadline be given for submittal of that plan to StafT. Gaffron recommended two weeks prior to the Council meeting for receipt of the plan. Barrett stated the motion to table would take precedence. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays I, Murphy opposed. k- Dale Application Received: 12-13-04 Date Application Considered as Complete: 12-13-04 60-Day Review Period Expires: 2-13-05 JAN ^ 4 2005 Ciiy ui- uHO.\o REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: Jaiuuiiy 20, 2005 Item No.: ^ Department Approval:Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: Name: Janice GundlachV-^ Title: City Planner /oiling Item Dc.scription: //05-3071, Anthony Thomas Homes, 400 Leaf Street - Variance - Resolution Zoning District: Lot Area: Lot Width: RR - IB, One Family Rural Rcsidcnt’al District (2 acre mininiiun) 0.835 acres (36,373 s.f.) 217.8 feet List of Exhibits A Resolution per Planning ('ommission Recommendation U - PC Action Notice 1-19-05 C - PC Memo and F.xhihits of 1-13-05 Application Summary: Applicant rei|uests a lot area variance to permit construction of a new residence on a lot 0.835 acres in size when 2.0 acres is required (administrative approval could be granted if the lot were 1.0 acre). 'I‘he property meets the 200 ’ lot width requirement. IManning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to apjirove the request in conjunction with the staff rcconuiiendation of City Engineer approval prior to issuance of a building permit. Staff Recommendation Approval per the attached Re.solution. COUNCIL ACTION RE(,?UESTEI) Adopt the attached Re.solution granting a lot area variance for 400 Leaf Street, w A KKSOUJTION CKANHN(; A VARIANC K TO MUNICIPAL ZONINC; CODE SKCriON 78-420 (H) HLK NO. 05-3071 WIILKEAS, Anthony Thomas Homes, Inc., (hcreinuftcr “the applicant ”) is the owner of the property located at 400 Leaf Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter the “City”) and legally de.seribed as follows: hot 30, AUDffOKS SUBDIVISION No. 230, Hennepin County, Minnesota {hereinalter the “property”); and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to tht City ol’Orono for a lot area variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-420 (B) to allow con.struetion of a new residence on an existing lot 0.835 acres in si /.c when 2.0 acres is normally required. NOW, I IIEREEORE BE IT P'' SOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minne.sota; FINI)IN<;S 1. Hiis application was reviewed sis Zoning rile f/05-3071. 2. fhe properly is locsilcd in (he RR - IB, One l-'simily Rursd Residential District, which requires a minimum lot area of 2.0 acres. 3. Tire Planning Commission reviewed this application at a pubhe hearing held on Jsinusiry 18, 2005 and recommended sipprovsil of the varismee based on the following findings: a. 'I he lot is an c.xisting lot ol record created prior to adoption of the current /.oning regulations. b. A hou.se hsis existing on the lot since prior to the eaily 1960’s. Page I of 5 c. The proposed house will he hrcaled in a eonroniiifig location, where the current house is non-conrorming with respect to setbac ks. d. The proposed house will meet nil other zoning requirements relating to setbacks, lot coverage tind building height. The ('ity ('ouncil has considered this application including the llndings and recommendation of the IManning t’ominissi(tn, reports by City stalf, comments by the applicant and the public, and the elTect of the pro|ioscd variaiice on the health, safety and welfare of the conununity. fhe City (’ouncil finds that the condition.s existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not ripply generally to other propety in this /oning district; that granting the variance would not adversely alfect traffic conditions, light, air nor po.se a fire ha/.ard or other danger to neighboring properly; would not merely serve as a convenience lo the applicant, luii is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is nece.ssary to prc.servc u substantial properly right of the applicant; and would be i*. keeping with the .spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Coinprehensive rian of the City. CONCLUSIONS, OUDKU AND CONDIHONS Hased upon one or more ol the above findings, the Orono City ('ouncil hereby grants a lot area variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 7X - 420 (11) to allow con.struction of a new residence on an exi.sting lot O.KIS acres in size when 2.0 acres is noiinally ic(|uired, subject to the lidlowing conditions: I (’ouncil approval is based on the site plan snbiniltcd l>y the applic.inl and annotated by City stall, attached to this Resolution as Lxhibii A. Any aincndinents to the site plan which are not in conibrinity with (’ity codes will rciiuirc further I’lanning Commission and ( ity Council review. 2. Required removals of structure shall be cmnpleted by the first inspection for the piopo.sed new home. 3. Ilie City luigineei shall approve the proposal grading plan prioi lo issuance of a buihling perinit. Page 2 of 5 4.Authorities granted by this resolution run with tlie property not with tlic applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (January 24,2006). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of the applicant and the applicant’s heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to tlie recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 24**' day of January, 2005. ArriiST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ProDcrt.. Ownci(s) Page 3 of 5 ] State of Minnesota ) ) ss, County of I Icmicpin ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this by Tony T.idcn, owner of Anthony rhotnas Homes, Inc. day of , 2005 Notary Public Page 5 of 5 CtiabllilMd ta IMS LOT oUKVEYS COMPANY, INC. UND SURVKYOKS nBuimniio innm ti« uw or orm or >woni«wtnwi ••• tM «• Mi 1M4 EXHIBIT A INVOICX NO .OflOyL. F.u.NO____yy-i •XALF; 1” O0l_ VMI VtKl it—w VwUl filin'I'tjors (flrrltfiretlr _AMTI1QH1 TU0MAa_U0MK3 |*rnp«riy Imiiilsd In liecUuti ^ 4. Tu«nilil|i 117. Ri«n**i iiri. IIfljifi«f*ln Cfiiinty, Mlim^'wntn Noli»; CArnf* droppml 3 caiirafii ^ Umntm nilfilliiK c:cMilfNir Dmritrfi |iro|Mm««l r.cNilmir a fir—w Mwd O Oiflutii t»o»i II Danotii Wood Mi«b **tl fo« fiirovcHkin orir «ooor) oonoiM iiMonoo (0U0'if)U9noi— l‘fo|K>Md ItevotMin - IMinolt* ^vurluti NOfC fVof»uM(l QftMfaa ofi «oli|«cl lo liiuHi of mmI ImU PropoMd buMIno Infofmolion rmi''.! Im chacliid iMh o|ifiifnr«d iMiAding pto« oml dMokipmanl o# gtudlny pkio hmUtim rirov<»i«or) (jfid r.n«>ttlrticl«on _- Mro|Mi«wf fiifi III fltocii fVop«iMd (Htfogi Mo« ;Pli PropoMd floof of llmbftng ftttl Ihnemmttl WMuut 9ft f m trrm* r m T™ iS^\»• a o»—w mrni dM Mm OlM 9/Mf l,oi :i0. AUDITOICI SUDDIVISION No 230 M onli aoMtfiwifi ilMion «• lium p4ala «l '••tud u# f»r < lionl 9h I •iflfy IImI thli ii • lni« ood cmrt^ •# o Mil MV of Iho b—imlaili# 90 Wm oImm dMinbod Unit «od Om ImulNwi of o« inifldlngi mh4 wMbf •wrmo«-hr*i#oti. d mtf. f»om ar on mmI bind *i4iivayail f > «*» IN* Hlh doy ul l>Uol»«» AI04 A*» f|f /f 04 I9mm**t9 «ool, *4^ t_ Wflif \Q 10 04 OTTfal (Vnoii Bf f ■■ Miwoa I Ar»Mi»Mi. iWrm fl«f NoChoriM I Arolaiado. IMbrm fl«f No II/M or fiiofory fl f**«o*h, Mi— don Mo 74091 I CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Crystal Ray, MN 55325 (952) 249-4600 ZONING WLE: 05-3071 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: January 19,2005 TO: Antliony Thomas Homes COPIES: 4100 Berkshire Lane Plymouth, MN 55446 TYPE OF APPLICATION:Lot Area Variance DATE OF MEETING: January 18,2005 Planning Commission recommended as follows: To approve the plans as submitted and revised stipulating City Engineer approval prior to building permit issuance. VOTE:FOR AGAINST Applicant’s next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council - Monday, January 24,2005; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission or Council minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Plamiing Commission or Council. If you have questions, please call City Planner Janice Gundlach at 952-249-4623. ¥ ir05v107l Jtiiiinir)* IK, 200S Tiiuc I of 3 Dale A|i|iliratioii Reedved: 12-13-04 Dale A|iplii'ation C*uii»icleretl us Coiiiplclc: 60-Duy Review PericMl Kipires: lo:Chair Kahn and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc, Cily Administrator From: Date: Subject: Janice Gimdlach, City Planner^ January 13,2005 05-3071, Anthony riiomas Homes Inc, 400 Ixaf Street - I.ot Area Variance - Public Hearing ZoniuR District: l.ot Area: Lot Width: KK IB, One Family Rural Residential District (2 acre minimum) 0.835 acrc.s (36,373 .s.f.) 217.8 feel AppHcaUon Summary: A|)plicant requests a lot area variance to permit construction of a new residence on a lot 0.835 acres in size when 2.0 acres is required (administrative approval could be granted if the lot were 1.0 acre). The propeily meets the 200' lot width requirement. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the request. The applicant will he required lo receive City Hngineer approval prior lo building permit issuance. Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections Sec. 78-420. Area, height, lot width and yard rc(|uiremcnts. (h) i'he following minimum re(|uirements shall be observed: l ot Arrs (arm)Ltil Widlli (rcTl)l-ront Ynfd (feet)Side Ynrd (fcrl)Sulc Ynrd Adjacent lo Slice! (feel) Rear Yaid (fee!) 2 2(K) _SO 30 50 50 List of Kxhibits Mxhihit A Applications P!xInbit B Hardship Documentation Fonn Fxhibil C Fxistiiig and Propo.sed Survey lixhibit I) Propo.sed Plcvatioius/Scclions Fxinhit ii Propo.sed Floor Plans Fxhibil F Aerial Photograph Fxhibit (i Properly Owneis l.i.st hxhibitll Plat Map /V05..107I JMiiiiMiy 18. 200S 2 of 3 llacktjrouiMl The iippliciinl orif'innily Kuhmiticd for n building pcmiit for construclion of a new rcsidciicu on October 29, 2004. 'I'iiu applicant wa.s Kub.sc(|ucntly sent a letter regarding the need for a lot urea variance as the lot wa.s under the required 2.0 acres and also less than the adtnini.strativc approval requirenient of 1.0 aeic. 'flic .i|iplieant has been working with stuff since that time preparing the necessary submittal materials for variance review. l,OT ANAI.YSIS WOKSIIKKT l.ot Arca/Width KK III l.ol Area l,ol Widlh Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acrc.s)200’ Actual 36,.173 s.f. (0.835 acrc.s)217.8’ Sclbacks KK IB Required Kxistiitg Rropo.<icd Front 50’23.5’50’ hoit.se Rear 50’ 110’ hoir.se 12’ detached garage 26’shed 50’ hortse l,cll Side (rrorth)30 ’ 155’ hrru.se 168 ’ detached grrrrrgc 126’shed 87’ house Right Side (sotrih).30 ’ 31 ’ hoir.se 24’ detached garage 74 ’ .shed ____ 54 ’ Slriirtural (’overage Total l.ot Area Total Structural (’overage .16,373 s.f. (0.8.15 acres)Allowed: .5,456 s.f. (1.5%) Froprr.scrl: 3,417 s. f. (9.4%) l.ut Area Variaiirc The applieaut i.s ie(|iiiied to obtain a l«)t area vaiiaiu e as the pmpcity di*e.s not meet the .’ <) lot area requirement ol the KK lU. One b'aiuily Rural Residential /oning di.strict of which the property he.s wilhirr. This property is s.f in area or 0 8.I.S acres when 87,120 s i. ol ruca or 2.0 acres is required artd adrnini.stralivc approval rrtay only be grattled when the lot is at least 41.500 s.f or 1.0 acre. K #05-3071 Jaimary 18,2005 of 3 Hardship Statement Applicant has provided a brief hardship statement in Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Hardship Analysis /m c0MtUeriMg applications/or variance, the Hanning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, Mgfety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger ^flre, rish to the public safety, and the effect on values of property In the surrounding area. The Hanning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code In Instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances nnlgue to the Individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when It Is demonstrated that such actions will be In keeping with the spirit and Intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Staff finds a hardship exists in order to grant a lot area variance. A residence has existed on this lot prior to adoption of the current Zoning Ordinance, similar to many otlier properties in the City. It has been the City ’s policy to approve lot area variance requests whoi lots arc not more intcn.scly develops, when a home has existed in the past, and all other Zoning Ordinance requirements can be met. The applicant has provided plans that will not require approval of any other variances and the new residence will be placed in a conforming location as oppos^ to the existing structures on the lot. The City Engineer has reviewed the preliminary grading plan but final approval will be a stipulation of building pennit issuance. Staff therefore finds tliat tlic applicant has demonstrated a hardship and should be granted approval of a tot area variance. iMuea for Consideration 1 . Arc there any other issues or concerns with this application? Staff Recommendation Approval of the lot area variance to permit construction of a new residence on an existing 0.835 acre lot when 2.0 acres is normally required. EXHIBIT A City of Orono Variance Application .‘.7/I/If/ Ailtitoss /'/fiO Kollt/y Parkw^iy Orono. MN Main; 'JUV fax; ^1:^740 4(i1(i Mtiilinq Aihhtj,*is. F* () hox IH’i Ciyf.tal Hay, MN OOiKi Ap[)lif;ali()n // 0(J I/ Dali* Rncoivnd Arnoiinl I’aid fUi'0( ^ ^ Sfaff ; C Too $l»00 Hi.‘lu/Will $!l()b Alli/rdluj fiicl: $ 1 7()() f)onhUi I tjo Tlii5 nppliralinn fnim miisl ho comfilitlod in full Appliciiiit will hn nolifind wilhin If) days as lo tho st.itua of Ifio .........'"“I Incomplolo applicntlons will nol Im plncoU on Planning Commission Agcncl.is. ('I'll' •ll'l 'Ji, t'l'lf' PROPERTY INFORMATION; Jjilu Addrosu } I'ropofly Idnniiliciilion Numlxu (PIN) ^ (Attach lu(|iil dt!:i(:iit)lion lo iipplicolion if nol indiidod on liio sutvoy ) Oalo Piopoily Ac<|iiin)d (tnonlli/yn.ir): □ Yor,, I own Iho adjnccnl |)nrcclri. PfofiMtil nso of properly: KosidonlinI □ Other _____ _ _ /onintj DisIricI: APPLICANT INFORMA flON; {Coiiiiilutu luititl n.imir. muJ iiuiiil.il iiii|itjii!cl (ill (tm;li iiiIiimviUmI (liiily) N-'inio: ... hAil'lCni) liu'^do, ...... ,. _________ Phono (homo); Phono(woik); 'f/;/* (*}>>[Phono (homo); Addroua; IInil ill;U',r'«\i:wkw/»/.iU''.:x'rYl ____a......._ rnx:i;v OWNER INFORMATION; (Cnm,.i.,i.»i<i<|i.hi N;""o l*hono (homo) Adilrer.s; Ini.iil i iwimos •mil iiiiiiil.il sl.iliis ioi|iiii(iil toi «m<:Ii iiili'ii'stinl iiiiity) i{}(\ i': fiVV \ ’.......................... Fax; l Phono (work): 7i'7'..llk7iV*'* tii'' '’ LS*'7j I I ••'ll ■9- = • ^ Svi;? /.4 \ii: / DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: I )os<;nho llio ioi|oo^t in dot.ill Estim.ilod Projocl Cost: itl.'ieh •idditional sheets il necessary):IIM7 II UT M M pi»T-^i ll'.l'/ (.WHP/l ()1 [\ la Mv. iViui • iii'tiK 'V';’ i.'ii’ t.fif iHi . ................ , .... .. .a_, (’I /IfC \a:f vl'fV ,iSj-i'(' U’L ll]| IP. /.•' /[((.'•' p' i'*'! .Cuun;l iv.AvbiiYr'!t.iil/,d:\v' p,U-\ prlr, iviii-/, rditr'/l iv/li-; /!/;•' V'lilbY/, IrV, fl(h(,n.l UP.i)Ai\'^ inNii j;<(!(r* >7' ' 'IlV |I'. tCSi’!'' 7' Ast'sHi t!'.iTa\.Uiar.dh iMr.’'. d. (iiv tlM.‘HTa'vj.U-i ir»: <kyp(/'.7(r ‘’■Yivudi. iMi* iwi: (ri Vvpy n'.h ,Oj-|'(' U’L 1|]| b'-il'.'ii' \\\) r.i'HiutiUi ’ii'-' IV »'i n»i . T. t V vn F / • I III.AI ’ *1L !'. U'. i ■lKrA(VdVln'!:;r t.- r;mkl l/ f/iiMhi Ci"i !hr. 1(1 \'.A\ Vvl’iuL .. 11'U'f (fuiiijii |nd*/^n/iir di.i!.ii| ('/•;/Hi I/uj- jimi i'\t uiiwi/i ij a't»v: pa/('-.V'v). i7l''.r’Wh7 v*uiPi Uibi..'’'- A- i/ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS: All of II in fnllowlnn Informallon musi ho 5iJl)millod by Iho appllcalion dondlinn d.ito in ofdnr for your • ippliciilion lo Im) pmciKisiul. K1 Hrn-A|»plu;.ilion Mnnlinrj I orm, r.omplnlod by a Cily Planner. U1 Compliilnd Applicalion I'orin □ Coinplntnd llaidv.liip Doc;uinnnl;ilion rorm IJ Corlifiod l*ropoily Ownorr. lisi ■ ownoro wilhin 1b0‘ of Ifio r.ubjor,l properly, labnlii and plal map. Usl, labohi and map may bn oblainnd from llonnn|)in Counly Dnpailmnnl of i inancn, Oovnrnim ’Ml ('•nninr, A (iO.'l MOO .Soiilh O'*' Jilrnnt, MiniUMpoiis, li;lr.>phonn Oi:^ :HM .‘>010 CJ Orioinal Cr.'tlificalo of ourvoy (sinned by a Ijcon-sed surveyor), mrielinn all Iho riifiuireiiKinls lisled within this packnl, innludini) hardcover calculations. Also provide one copy H V x 11” or . y 1 r X 1 /" for reproduction Cornplelod tiardcovor cnlculation workr.heets (as provitJt ’il wilhin the vari.inco packet). L'J' Topoiiraphic r.urvey - incliidirui exislino and proposed (>levations Provide orn; cofiy 8 b” x 11“ or II" X I/" for reproduction r1 .Sketr:lies or plans of door and elirvation views (provide one (,«)py H J)" x 11" or 1 1" x 1/"). LI ArJdiflonal ilerns may be reriucssted by City .Staff defiendinQ on the scope of the project * APPLICANT’S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Iho afiplicanl hereby ajjroos lo provide alt information rerjuired or rerjuer.led by Itur Planninp DeparlmenI, aprees to pay additional liiiis (staff lime not covered in the oriitin.il fee payment) .ind/or r.onrailtant expeii!;e!i inciir.i.'d in review of this, applicalion and iterlifies that the information sii|)plied is true and correct to Iho lie!;t of his/her knowledpr' Tlio applicant rccocjnizos tliat fio/sho Is solely rosponsiblo for submitting a comploto application boing awaro that upon (alluro to <lo so, the staff has no altern.itivc} hut to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the ro(|uest for denial of the rerpiest rr’gardless^f It^^potential p^ei^ Apfillcanfn f'arjnaturn;, //• ^'P'/________ Applir-.aiilsJiinii.ilurl^:-'',./^^/J^^,^/^ •____ ’ ZI OWNER’S ACKNOWLEDGCMCNT: Iho owner lioieliy acknowledges and aproes to this application and further .iiilhori/e;. reas.onablo entry onto the properly by City Slalf, coiisnil.ints, agents, (.Commission 8, Council Mornbors for purposos of investlpallon nnti j/fTifir^ffon of tins tftffuo'it nwnei's SMin.iinio; ^ (Jwners SIrinalufn-Dale: Applu ant most h.ive all sohmitl^. into Uie ('.ily oflices d.iys helori* the I’l.iniiing Commission Mc’(?tinp I’lanninri Commission Meolings are normally held on tho third ^''ond.ly of isicli month. Applicants must he piesont at ail scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If .III .ipplic.int i;. iin.ihle lo .ilti>nd .i r.r hediiled meeting, please in.ike .iii.ingiMiicnts to have an aulhoii/od lepresuntativo attend in placo of tfie applicant and .ulvi:.e the ('ily Pl.inner nsfiigned to your project City of Orono Pre-Application Meeting Form (This form is lo be completed by a City Planner during your pre-appllcatlon mGetlng.*) Stmot Addmss 2750 Kulluy (\iikwny Orono. MN 5535G Main: 952-249-4(>00 f ox 952-249-461G Mniling Addmss: P.O. Box GG Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 ror Offtco Use Only: City fMannor; C/Afll// ________ Meeling Dalo/Timo: Ip/* t PC Date; JJn What Is the purpose of a pro-application meeting? Pre-application mcutingr, aid the applicant in proparinq a complofc proposal, inform thorn of Iho procedures and requirements of the city code, and identify policies or regulations that create opportunities or ptchioms for the proposal. PROPERTY INFORMATION: Site Address: •/-(’() li At Property Identification Number (PIN): pf - il'| •’’/ *•• -~()( I Zoning District; l>p _ Size of Property:_______________ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST; D Average Sollrack □ Side Yard Srjlback □ Roar Yard Setback □ Hardcover □ Lot Ctm:rarjo Area □ Othnr: □ FforU Yarri Seiliack □ 1 ot Width Applicant's HARDSHIP: Applicant fias received the Hardship Documerttation rortn. Initials:__' 'jy understarKis it as it fins freon explained to them, and is ^lwnre that it must bo completed and submitted in conjunction witti tfieir formal variance application. OTHER INFORMATION: •Ploaso note: Your varinnfco application will NOT bo accepted without a pre-application mooting during which thi}; (orm wiji bo cornpleted by City staff. Applicant Signature:mhnt Date: \i.\1^Mf It r'’-:. fs I.I* EXHIBIT B I’iii'c I <in HARDSHIP DOCUMENTATION FORM This form Is a rcqulrod submittal for ALL varianco applications. An .ipplicnimti will nol 1)0 consldorinJ (;om()lolo or pl.icod on ;iny moolinrj ;i(jond.is nnlil lhi<; fomr is coinploto and Mibmillod lo Iho Cily. Minnosola Illalo .Slnliio Si.'clion SWA 'Jf, .Sulidivision / ro(|ujros that ii hnrd:.lii|) la; domocslialod in ordor for a varianco lo hr» (jraiitral Tlin hardship miisl hr? ufmjno lo Iho piopoily as vati.int.os run wilh Hit) l.ind .ind nol Iho land ownttr rorsonnl and vutiiumic mliialinns am not conmdnmd valid hanh.hip;; lti ordor lor an application to ho lio.ird tty tilt) I’lannintj Commission .ind City (^niincil a hardship havinp morit mnsl ho (lomon;;tralod HOW DO I PROVE A HARDSHIP? This loim has I? pomi;; niithninn Ihtr basis Cily stall uses lo dolormino il ,i haitb.liip t'xisis and how Iho varianco will allof;l Iho surrounding r.otnmiinlly. To piovo a haids.liip. ;i(l(lioss all Ihi! lolov.inl poinir. It;,lot) Imlow and answer them as cloatly as potir.lhlo Cinia? you am ro(|ooslitit| Iho corJo oxcr ’ptlon, you have Iho burden of proving that the varianco is Justified. I ho informalion Iho City receives is what is used in deloiminiiui a iloiiial 1)1 appmval mcnmmt;ndalion. II you leave something oul il will nol l)o considoiotl r*loa!.e address each o( those hardship criteria .is they relate to the iec|i)e;,l (tiumo may nol apply) 1.“Iho propoity in (jueslion cannot bo pul to a re.ison.ilile use if used under condiliomi allowed by Iho ofbciql control:)," o’lK Wftb ur. lvrtr'(\ wi'am t’i'iHi. if't.i ' /' "the plight t)l Ihe l.indowiioi i;; duo lo ciictimsl.inces unitiiie lo his |)iopetly nol created liy the l.indownei." / (hit 'v'iio ij.)'4i{lUjt trf^r.v.(Vi!fxT}i:3i!i)ii.| tVi^i'i: tu/i/ 3, ‘Tlio Viin.inctO, if cjr.ifitmJ, will not ; if Ih' VL'.fC’iii/.' ,i/' t'l '1 i/ii* .. f'-.liliV.iil /TUlrlii'l/:'. m Wy rtji'hf !'• Her ho os5cnll.nl character of Ihe lot.alily " ^ 'Inlhfilij Inniiri? vydnif, ,I'.f'ii'L' /'.vr^fl.lf.t' U’c LiifVTru y»ii.v;({'(i\J njl' :Ui, ii^dT': iri|^ ilii. (/‘ii;'(;i:iji.| •v/'t’iVd// Icondmic t:ohsitloriilionn alone sh.ill nol conslilnie .in undue h.iidship if reastjnablo usis lot the (iiopi.Mly exi;.l;; under the lenns ol Ihe /oning Cha(il<'r Jrlhit\:^ ■Ihi-m.i? i.yvicvjYiinl */ I' vii.' 'i<j rd'i/i/.i.: ji Y. '•ir./ut: f] ir; ti'i: L4r i^‘ I'li'i"* t I'lIllJ. llO''/ '’ill/jic //ji)!i(i1 lUihl ncirt Iir;| ViTv l,.’iUlj_ 0 0, I’iii'C 7. of 3 "Undiin Imtdnltip nino iiw.liidnr.. but is not limited to. inndncui.ilu ncctrss to diroci miiiIkjI iI fot sol.ir fmiftjjy !.y!,U>ms V.itl.incns fjo griinlod for c.irlli sliollercd (oif.tmdion .i;. dofiiiod in MiiuiksoI.i ol;iliil(>n, Ib'clion 1 HU.OO. otibd. when in fi.'itmony willi this " . i.i 1<? i;i. H''b Ah Y viUir;/). a\. |!,v, r.^vv ^'ir.nk f'llVAT t vilr'; jlJnli ^.1 r/ VI ’ t/ 7'3 r>j' y * v/J'l :*,Vi’ _li n * lt»A'!.v '/vhr.':'- ii\y\\\(: 'nUL r/i'*’.', t'i!iII: “Iho Ru.ird of Appo.iln and Adjiistmoiits ot fho Coiincit may not |M>niut a*, a vnriati(.u any u;.o th.il is 0(»t poimittod one for ttiis Ctiaptor for pio|)i.Mly in ilio /ono wtioni ttio affoctod poison's land is l/HSifod (It iVJ'ir -lUdj' ('.if'i. lliat !'• ltd VMt lit •!'•'.ivtfl' Mil (Hllf f 1 •*'' ir. !'i ir.iif'/J.'dt 'v*'. t'f!i Xm'wm “Tlio noani or Connal may poimit nr; a varianco Ifio tumporary uso of a ono-faniily dwollin;) as a two family dwollinij " d' I'f 1,1'j'(/ I'’ 1'i ‘j li.i: iM ir dut/'hc’t' uA''''* I :l(: il»d\ tKl i" trv: r/'Wf/ •]lii. •*( :!/' lo r/ iiv'.iM |/,- v uinorrryrr' '*Ilu! spiM.ial cniidilinns iipplyiru) to Ihn slmcliiMt or loiuj in ()UHv.tion nio pnciilinr to TiUch pmpuity or IrniiUMlinloly .idjoinir <} pio )(f»!y ** !r/. AdlivUUrl. At VMimI •\t/ Hi i>'; i/'<rv'! «m tJ/ /'v /iV'li'/! ... "Ilio rondiiions do not npply ponnmlly lo olhor l.irui or m |fir» dislrict In which !»oid I. nd is loc.itod, if (At j/!/' \MiJl>'A't'" Hi'tyyr;! in it: n;*'fjidii-1 m ' A':l \Ki "Ifill piantint) of lliii a|ipliration is norossary foi tho prosorvation and oiijuyniiinl ot a raifislanfial |)to|)oily ii<|til of Iho applic.anf.' IK’ Mill Mill » M IIIU II. j . K-'.Vir.f( V'Y \'ii|uvti/f: Atlh'nM \i&0' Vi t,iiU it •iif/i Mfinv- i( i:y''-hrd] v,r..;iltv aiMiUi titifl riii \\\\ Aiv j't*«ttf;Hi) V»: I'M “Itil? pniiilinr) of Ihff propilsod v.in.itico will no! in nny w.iy impoir hisillh, ?Milfdy, coiiifod. moiols, Ml in nny olhoi n»spi?cl ho conti.iiy lo Iho intisil of lln? /oniii(| Cpdo” ii did il l TilM ir AIM' ir .tl'l) tfj’ |i:d II;l' di.'tnliKA (’<i:fld'cVf ■/•/.'inr’.Lt Vviii At! ini Hi't ^ f u ifhici n ,irp’d vv av.liiif^j j.j iiY. li ji7, ;vi:d:f) nJt . • yyi/Mi <. • i i of 3 1?. Tho (ifi'iMtlnfj of such vorlonco will not fooroly sorvo ns n cofjvonionco to Iho nnplicnnt, l)Ul Is nocossory to allevlalo domonslrnhlo hnnlfihip or difficulty.** Hardship Statomont Should you fool the hnrdship cnruiot fully bo described In tho abovo criturin. doscribo tho uni(|un hnrdsliip, practical difficulty or unusual property conditions prevontiny compliance with /onimj Ordinanco rnquirfjmonts in tho following lines (attach additional shoots if nocos?inry): \\ 4, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota lote: Garage dropped 3 courses Denotes existing contour !)enotes proposed contour ^%.o 982.2 979.7 973.5 building plan and devel grading plan before ex and construction. Proposed Top of Block Proposed Garage Floor Proposed Lowest Floor Type of Building Full Basement Wol 971.7 9/K7 'pmmm ■n-r’ u vini-iv, TiiiBiLD 0 ll. v3C!^F?5 "''TT^T^ ’T^t '<‘*1- ! '.1 i t H i|ii'JI 1 '■ ’ ty»i.Mi.. l?ii-'4l-! I I ^ttfS'itt.'iuU) * i K. ft 1 f 1% • »1(M A K^S . ^*c» . TAA« (Mm. ■— »A*«Mr H6kj ric^Dei. 1* ■ * J » . .-• 1 . .* ' '-•> V ,..r. ... i,'-,?-. n z X H 4 ^oc»l f ^ -^»vl* (t ^iO »•# rt•y. ni f. .% t 1 •L Wtff 1^ 0^tt K ni! , 'l\m!>■»• «4 4 V h I r..u . A**-- { [t \l , \r * r»»» ^ #»• »<«v* t* ifn 4 ,/ ^ WI* V "''T — ill 1.iU!f ■ ! rv X— » \ ^ If. »4 . Ai», t I \ VATu>f4 >t. • I ifuT ^r-*. —i»-i^ i: 1 1 . i4 . A'^ iU n) V i ; ^ /. T - ••!« '**•* I P 4SS»®JiUf •■• »« I • I « ^ 1 »«•!« I 'iini fSnaSf'gj '•* ■' 'Tft *•♦••••»•» • •-4 |«*W m |irr.rto /^r\i f \ 1 \ l'"j ^r\i f r ^ I \ » y// 1 1 (■ ' •*' /ilV^.■,k.;.j.;;..^.rj..':;\i » -V'T •*' • •%0>** \» e *> I T r • p u /•> r -j • ^ M M> t\ k % ',1 f';.\ ti .\rSn ' ' I*,» B!i iM' .k.uiff g mk^» • • i % * * It •-1 U'^Z - « M •»■«•• r«# u 1. . . » »>/. I' c’ r-i 7^ j^r I. ».1 A** . At (• > IT % t* \<>*v V [ Av' tA * • 4 t #«r| ►;^r/ (A H U t > - «*riA i%j. C«<*1 Ik;*' w-tf ir ^Hiy \rwiiJ^iuf wi«rkA\r%)"^ ;».t A.^« r«» »A .r| « A4#M •> M»>U f*Tv IV1 n» V • 4f (^ lo.* r*.t *^* 1 »k»V*» A* (P «j «•. VS* fc\r r*^Ai«A» l*Jt Aiir • 4p4i f Ai |4 i-V-i^ Ck^:.u!L v: f ^_________MP«nAr»l 1^4 r «.4 T I V* tfu-A-ve^vy >***»^ e *.r. 4'Ai f •*-»•< I* •»» c; 44 ck V(^" Aktf*. j»4f. A'** P'‘n ^ <k.| t‘«»^Au f* t*CJ f . ,rwi‘ 0tt «««« r^- H» f rm0tf Atn «kr - 4* • fl fv* A« ^V'****® * r“'i IdJ I r i*r I #* *»*• l.» .4U ft-f t'-Tt rArntiv ^ L.I ^ll' i r'^7\f t. ^ ■':::AiOfmAt •• r • r- «■■•• M ANAt>r (4 -• ^ ■•A iTn^rr . M* I f I i«.*t«A ‘I kA'** /»»!», ■"' T.y /T\ i; ’M 11 '.*1H *^t..>:T I 3l]i'iU..^ ^ I * ^ »-4.«|A«t i1 ♦ ^ >;f 4 »*4 JT * i f ^ ‘I Jj .11 rtkH I- ,^. U V*t»AA. V*k*» k»»i* l|vU, !f.... ■ ZT'Xir,::3L rj::jUSS^. PNA \^>»u a-— ;>i» - / ✓ */4* *»»' ♦» A.f*m 0 «** 4 • rm ’V»iik % kv fA»TC •»<ww VAA » Af^ ^♦H Il.‘«*k*t V<7 «»€X.'•>•».»- -r- '' V^*t» T-1 r.:? - •»..^ ut k|k. »I c-** —7¥-.TT’Trr- Tr^~- ' t*1 X X 5 H PI rtgVMC^-'ATir»s4 *,4*, |-t3* K-«r 6 ^ »»■ #‘ ni''r-.-. ■‘»-*.w; ;v. '*;5> t r . ,. ■-1, \ u > r I^V^FLoc^i^F-L -.^Vv^ *4‘ • I.C*' |4^^4,< 4r^p^v<n% A'r*-*^^4 o* Av«w^v rH n ^*^»4|ft*»4 **».c>* Cl *0 f» -V t> mm ms n M. S|- V: m. dfll ■ .-.* % •■ .1 mm. ^1 £Tlj ’t-^'+ v^.: ................................. - V.- ^4 * ■ . < ^ t# !?rf :'- a,'^7 W’i^MSt''' r* V 1 *x'^ M^: V*' 1 g p ^lli€ ■;*«» mm^: '.:mr ^WM -r-.v ,i V |^*ri^ V '--*^>^ J'Uv^.v £ J*. ‘‘-■A 3?-5'.V J ‘. «► IIliff..5. <,.3: t •• ■Nf;^ > •- S»/5 ‘iSk:- .4^1 li_. h^immi^k 'i «iiW v», ▼• 'M^: • 'Th » ar. 'C • * i. ?'• ■ # 'M: • •■* l^v'^ * i . ■wl *1^9® id *4 > - t4r /i. 1, * V W- -h '•■ >\. ,..^.:.:i’^<y£:,. ^ VJ^liE: I • i i-a ‘ ^::;A‘lfy’ S - ^ - -‘ l'i*-V ■ ^ RUN DATE : IIAIA>a)4 38 0411723230004 »ROPADDR 370 LEAF ST 2WNERNAME KENNANKKROLL TAXPAYER KENNAN K KROa ^AME/ADDR 370 LEAF ST LONG LAKE MN S5356 38 0411723230007 ’ROPADOR 398 LEAF ST 3WNERNAME KATHRYN A ANDERSON TAXPAYER KATHRYN A ANDERSON ^AME/ADOR 398 LEAF ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 0411723320007 *ROP ADDR 3190 SUSSEX RO )WNER NAME J D KENNEY R M J KENNEY TAXPAYER JOHN D KENNEY/MARY J KENNEY MME/ADDR 3190 SUSSEX RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 0511723140059 •ROPADOR 375 LEAF ST 3WNERNAME D H CROWTHER R S J CROWTHER AXPAYER 0 H CROWTHER R S i CROWTHER MME/ADDR 375 LEAF ST LONGUKEMN 55356 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMA. iON SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PAGE: 1 38 0411723230005 PROPAODR 370 LEAF ST OWNER NAME KENNANKKROLL TAXPAYER KENNAN K KROLL NAME/ADDR 370 LEAF ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 0411723230006 PROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED OWNER NAME KENNAN K KROLL TAXPAYER KENNAN K KROLL NAME/ADDR 370 LEAF ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 0411723230009 PROP ADDR 360 LEAF ST OWNER NAME ELAINE C FURCHNER TAXPAYER ELAINE C FURCHNER NAME/ADDR 360 LEAF ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 0411723230010 PROP ADDR 400 LEAF ST OWNER NAME ANTHONY THOMAS HOMES INC TAXPAYER ANTHONY THOMAS HOMES INC NAME/ADDR 4100 BERKSHIRE LA N PLYMOUTH MN 55446 38 0411723320008 PROP ADDR 3160 SUSSEX RD OWNER NAME T A FORSYTHE «: K K FORSYTHE TAXPAYER THOMAS A KELU FORSYTHE NAME/ADDR 3160 SUSSEX RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05II723U0007 PROP ADDR 3200 BAYSIDE RD OWNER NAME TRENT ALERY REZABEK TAXPAYER TRENT A REZABEK NAME/ADDR 3200 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 0511723410018 PROP ADDR 3211 BAYSIDE RD OWNER NAME J A & T J F LUNDELL TAXPAYER JAMES & TRACEY LUNDELL NAME/ADDR 3211 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 wIs H o 1CERTIR' THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS 4 ‘T.. V ^ % .• . . 4 V* F.XHmiT H Hennepin Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Department l^roperty locatea in section 4. Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota fiiu&i ue wuii u building plan and develo grading plan before exc* and construction. >te: Garage dropped 3 courses snotes existing contour enotes proposed contour Proposed Top of Block • Proposed Garage Floor Proposed Lowest Floor Type of Building Full Basement Walh |^VMf IfjV*971.7 Gravel Road I I I ^ 975,29 976 f Date Application Kccdvcd: 12-22-04 Date Application C.'onsidercil as Complete: 12-22-04 60-l>ay Keview Period Kxpircs: 2-l‘t-05 RKQIIEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Ocpartmi'nl Approval: Name: Janice (JundlaclL^^ Title: City I’lanner Administrator Approval: JAN 'I 4 2005 Cl I r uh OHONO Date: January 20,2005 Item No.: ^ Ai>c-n<la Section: Zoning Item Description: #05-3076, Gregory & Jeanne Gustafson, 1280/1290 Spruce Plane, Variances, Conditional Use Permit, Resolution Zoning District: fyot Area: Lot Width: LR ■ IIJ, One Family Lakeshure Residential District (1 acre miiiiimim) 0.42 acrc.s (18,490 s.f.) 100.58 feet shoreline; 100 feet (cd 75 foot setback List of Exhibits A Resolution per Planning Commission Recommendation B - PC Action Notice 1-19-05 C - PC Memo and Kxhibits of 2-12-05 Application Summary: ApplieanI requests the following variances in order to construct a new residence on an existing lot: 1. Lot area variance to permit construction of a new residence on a loi 0.42 acies in si/.e when 2.0 acres is normally required. 2. Lot width variance to permit construction of a new residence on a lot approximately 100 ’ in width al the shoreline and 75’ setback when 140 ’ is normally required. 3. Conditional u.se permit to allow’ grading within the 0-75’ setback /one consisting of removal of the e.xi.sting house imd restoration of the grade. Planning C’uinmi.s.sion Recoinineiululion I'he Planning ('ommission voted 5-1 to approve the reque.si ms submitted stipulating the folhiwing staff recoinmeiidalion; 1. Dedication of 10 ’ drainage and utility ca.senients along the side lot lines and street lot line. 2. Implementation of the recommendations of the (’ily Lugincer letter dated January 4, 2005 3. hurmal combination ol lioO and 1290 .Spruce Place prior to building permit issuance. Staff Recommendation Approval per the attached Resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached Rcsolulion granting a lot area variance, lot width variance and conditional use permit for 1280/1290 Spruce Place. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 78-330 (B) AND 78-1250 FILE NO. 05-3076 WHEREAS, Gregory D. Gustafson and Jeanne S. Gustafson, husband and wife (hcrcinaAcr “the applicants”) are tlie owners of tlie property located at 1280 and 1290 Spruce Plan within the City of Orono (hereinafter the “City ”) and legally described as follows: Lot 3, Block 10, SAGA HILL RHVISED, Hennepin County, Minnesolu I-ot 4, Block 10, SAGA HlLl. REVISED, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinaOer the “property”); and WHEREAS, the applicants have made application to the City of Orono for variances and a conditional use permit to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78- 330 (B) and 78-12S0 to allow construction of a new residence on an existing lot 0.42 acres in size when 1.0 acres is normally required, 100 feet in width at the shoreline and 75 foot setback when 140’ is normally required, and a conditional use permit to allow grading within 75 feet of the lake in order to remove the existing home and restore the site to match the existing grades and to remove the existing retaining walls. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. 2. Tliis application was reviewed as Zoning Pile /f05-3076. The property is located in the LR - 1B, One Eamily Lakcshorc Residential District, which requires a minimum lot area of 1.0 acres. 3.The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on January 18, 2U05 and recommended approval of the variances and conditional use permit based on the following findings; Page 1 of 6 m 4. 5. a. The two lots arc existing lots of record created prior to adoption ol'the current zoning regulations. b. A house has existed on Lot 3 since prior to tlic I950 ’s. c. The existing home, which will be removed, is non-conlbrming with respect to the 75 ’ setback from the lake and also hardcover within 75' of the lake. d. I'hc conditional use permit request is merely to remove the existing residence Ikiiiic and restore the site. c. The proposed home will meet all setbacks, lot coverage, hardcover and building height regulations. f. I he two lots will be legally combined in order to be considered as a single parcel for zoning purposes. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City stalT, comments by tlic applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance and conditional use permit on the health, .safety and welfare of the community. 'fhe City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance and conditional use permit would not adver.sely afiect tralfic cmiditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other •langcr to neighboring property; would not merely .serve as a coinenience to the applicant, but is nece.s.sary to alleviate a demon.strable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to pre.servc a substantial property right of the applicant; and would Ik* in keeping with the .spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 6 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Omno City Council licrcby grants variances and a conditional use permit to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-330 (B) and 78-1250 to allow construction of a new residence on an existing lot 0.42 acres in size when 1.0 acres in normally required, 100 feet in width at the shoreline and 75 foot setback when 140 ’ is normally required, and lastly a conditional use permit to allow grading within 75 feet of the lake in order to remove the existing home and restore the site to match the existing grades and to remove the existing retaining walls, subject to the following conditions; 1. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicant and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan which are not in conformity with City codes will require further Planning Commission and City Council review 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, legal combination of Lots 3 and 4 shall be filed with the Department of Property Tax and Public Records af Hennepin County. 3. Five (5) foot drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated along the street and north and south side lot lines of the property. 4. The City Engineer must approve a final grading plan prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. Hardcover in the 0-75’ zone shall not increase above the level of 0%. Hardcover in the 75-250’ zone shall be limited to 2,737 s.f or 25% per the proposed plan and hardcover allowance summary as depicted on Exhibit A. Applicant is advised that any future requests to increase hardcover will not likely be approved without concurrent reduction in existing hardcover. 6. Applicant shall remove all plastic or fabric liner material from the decorative land.scape beds on the property to ensure their permeability as non-hardcover surfiices. 7. Required removals of structure and hardcover sliall be completed by the first inspection for the proposed new residence. Page 3 of 6 8. Authorities granted by this resolution run with tlie property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variances and conditional use permit will expire on that date (January 24,2006). 9. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 10. The undersigned applicants have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of the applicants and the applicants ’ heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 24*** day of January, 2005. AITEST: Linda S. Vcc, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 4 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of 2005 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of 2005 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation aud said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 i md liu * State or Minnesota ) ) ss. County of Hennepin ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this__day of by Gregory D. Gustafson, husband of Jeanne S. Gustafson. ,2005 Notary Public State of Minnesota ) )ss. County of I lennepin ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this by Jeanne S. Gustafson, wife of Gregory D. Gustafson. day of .2005 Notary Public 1 Page 6 of 6 EXHIBIT A 75+ =• 10950SF X25X-2737 PROPOSED HC HOUSE « 2050 DECK - 20 DRIVE » 580 WALK = 70 PERG FTG = 8 SF RET.WALL - 9 SF total - 2757 25.055 / -/------plant slope surface ¥»ith non mawienance crounocovlr ;;^ 0-75 7540SF EXISTING HC HOUSE - 470 WALK ■ 100 RET WALL ■ 80 TOTAL « 6S0SF PROPOSED 0 SF walk AND^TA^V WAlLS^w CXISTHC HOUSE .w !1 L^E=93B 8\v \ * A,'EXIST IMG , HdlSE y \ -j V': / \ WT^y&hxd ISTKTi N ■\ ' n-\ ■#^vA ';\y.\WJ> N cj ^qljou-a •^?s s s SCALE FEET e'D'O* PROPOSED ELEVATIONS GARAGE FLOOR-948 0 TOP OF FOUNDATION -956 8 . LOWEST FL00R«946.75 BENCHMARK TOI’ IRON PPE CLEV = 953 0 «4*' - EXISING SPOT aEVATIOn 2 X(99fl 0) . PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATK3N S’ “ DIRECTION SURFACE ORAWAGC t legal DESCRIPTION: S lot 3 ic 4. BLOCK 10. SAGL NLL REVISED. ~ SFI^CE PLACE PiOill 08-117-23-32-0014 address - 1290 SPRUCE PLACE PID# 08 -117-23-32-0015 LOT AREA-13110SF/0.30 AC.X 25X- 3277SF ALLOWABLE HC PROPOSED drainage AND UTILITY EASEMENTS northwesterly 5 FEET OF LOT 3 and Jh E SOUTHEASTERLY 5 FEET OF LOT 4 I CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box M Crystal Bay, MN 55323 (952) 249-4600 ZONING FILE: 05-3076 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: January 19,2005 TO: Gregory & Jeanne Gustafson 370 Golfview Road N. Palm Beach, FL 33408 COPIES:Alexander Design Group 401 E Lake Street Wayzata, MN 55391 ................................................ DATE OF MEETING: January 18,2005 Planning Commission recommended as follows: To approve the request as submitted with the following stipulations: 1. Dedication of 10’ drainage and utility easements along the side lot lines and street lot line. 2. Implementation of the recommendations of the City Engineer letter dated January 4,2005. 3. Formal combination of 1280 and 1290 Spruce Place prior to building permit issuance. VOI'E:FOR AGAINST Applicant’s next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council - Monday, January 24,2005; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission or Council minutes, they arc available from tlie City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission or Council. If you have questions, plea.se call City Planner Janice Gundlach at 952-249-4623. Dilic A|>plic»tluii Kcccivi'il: 12-22-04 Dale Applicalloii CoiiiMcrcd as C'oiiipleic: 12-22-04 60-Uay Review Period Kipircs: 2-19-05 ffOS.1076 January IN, 2005 Pat>c I ul 5 To; From: Suhjerl: Chair Rahn and Planning Commission Members Roil Moorsc, City Administrator Janice Cinndlucti, City Planner^ January 12,2005 05-3076, Alexander Design Group on bthalfol (Jreg & Jeanne Gustafson, 1280/1290 Spruce Place, Lot Area and Lot Width Variance and 0-75’ Conditional U.SC Permit Public I learing Zoning District: Lot Area: l.ot Width: LR lU, One I'amily Lakcshorc Residential District (I acre min.) 0.42 acres (18,490 s.f.) 100.58’ r«) Shoreline; 100’ (a) 75’ Setback Application Summary: Applicant requests the following variances in order to constrnet a new residence on an cxi.sting lol: 1. Lot area variance to permit construction of a new residence on a lot 0.42 acres in size when 2.0 acres is normally required. 2. l^t width variance to permil construction of a new residence on a lot approximately 100’ in width at the shoreline and 75’ setback when 140’ is normally required. 3. C.’onditional use pennit to allow grading within the 0-75’ setback zone consisting ol removal of the existing hou.se and restoration of the grade. Staff Recommendation: StalT recommends apjiroval .subject to the following conditions: 1. Dedication of 10’ drainage and utility ca.scmcnts along the side lot lines and street lot line. 2. Implcmenlation of the recommendations of the City l•;ngincer letter dated January 4, 2005. 3. I’ormal combination of 1280 and 1290 Spnice Place prior to building permit i.ssuance. Prrtincnl Zoning Ordinance Sections See. 78-330. Area, height, lol wiilih and yard re(|uircmcnts. (b) Luts. 1 he following minimum requirements shall be observed l.ul Aim (4iir)l.a« Wliilh (IrrI)I’Mml Ynul (Icrl)Side Yard Adjacciil lu Amilhri Lol (feel) Rear Yaid (feel)Side Yuid Ad)aceiil lo Slice! (feel) 351140351030 fOS-3076 January 18,2005 Page 2 of 5 List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Applications Exhibit B - Hardship Documentation Form Exhibit C Existing and Proposed Survey w/Hardcover Calculations Exhibit D Proposed Elevations Exhibit E - Proposed Floor Plans Exhibit F - City Engineer Comments Exliibit G - Aerial Photograph Exhibit 11 - Property Owners List Exhibit 1 Plat Map Background This property underwent the variance process in June of 2003 under a previous owner. That request included a lot area variance, lot width variance, 0-75 ’ and 75 ’-250 ’ zone hardcover variances and also a conditional u.se permit for the 0-75 ’ zone. A resolution approving a lot area, lot width, and 0-75 hardcover variances and also a conditional use permit for the 0-75 ’ zone is attached. The 75 ’-250 ’ zone hardcover variance request was denied. This resolution was allowed to expire without renewal. New owners have acquired the property and are requesting similar variances, however none hardcover, in order to construct a new residence. Their request will also include combination of 1280 and 1 290 Spruce. I>OT ANALYSIS WORSIIEET Lot Area/Width LK-IB l^ot Area Lot Width Required 43,560 s.f. (1.0 acre)140 ’ Actual 1 8,490 s.f. (0.42 acres)100.58 ’ Setbacks LR-IB Required Existing Proposed Front N/A N/A N/A Rear 30’95’35’ Left Side (.south)10 ’61 ’34’ hou.se 20 ’ pergola Right Side (noilh)10 ’10 ’18 ’ Lakeshore 75 ’51 ’104 ’ Average Lakeshore 83’28’ encroachment confonuing /^05-1076 Jiiitiiury IK, 20(KS .1 of 5 'I'olal lad Area Total Structural <'overage 18,490 s.f. (0.42 acres)Allowed: 2.7T3.5 .s.f. (15%) Propo.sed: 2,364 s.f (12.8%) Hardcover C!alculations Hardcover /one 0 75 75 250 'I'ohil Area in '/Ante 7540 s.f. 10,05 0 s.r. Allowed IJanlc«»yer 0 s>' (0%) _ 2,737.5 .s.r. (25%J * Ha.scdon I’C report from 2003 application Kxistiii}' Hardcover 650 .s.r (8.6%) 2,538 s.r ” (23.05%)* Proposed Hardcover o.s.r (0%) 2,737 .s.r (25'J^ l.ot Area/I.ot Widlli Variance (’urrcntly there are two 50 ’ wide lakcshorc lots containing Ic.ss than 10,000 s.f. of area. riic.se 10,000 s.f. lots were legally plaited prior to adoption of ilic current /.oiiing Ordinance. The applicants have propo.sed to comhine these lots in an effort to gain more area and width to allow construction of a single family residential home. In combining thc.se lots a net lot area of 18,490 s.f. is piopo.sed when 43,560 s.f. is retpiired; and a lot width ol 100.58 ’ at the shoreline and 75 ’ .setback is propo.sed when 140 ’ is normally reriuircd. 'Hie propo.sed lot area and lot width, when 1280 and 1290 are combined, do not meet the standards for adminislralive approval and llierefore rc(|uire Ibrnial approval of lot area and lot width variances. Hardship Statcmciil Apjjlieant has provided a brief hard.ship statcnicnt in lixhibit H, and should be asked (dr additional te.stimony regarding the application. Hard.ship Analysis _ /« fuiisiilt ’rinf! upplicalioiis fur vurianrt, the Planniuf’ r 'ummhsion shall cunsiJrr the rjfcct of the in u/>0M ‘J vai ianve upon the health, safety atul u-eljare of the eommiiaity, existio)’ anil anticipate J trajj/le eoiuHlIons, llphf amt air, danger of fire, risk to the piihlic safety, aail the effect on values of property in the surrounJInff area, I he Plaitniiiff I’oniinission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoninf; i 'ode in instances where their strict enforcement would canse undue hardship because of circumstances uniifue to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will he in keepinp with the spirit and intent of the Orono /.oninu Code. •Stall fmds that the liaidsliip lies in the timeframe under which lhe.se lots were (Ir.st platted I he e.si.sting hou.se was coii.stmi te*l .solely on I2S0 prior to mid 19S0 ’s as well as single family residences on 12 /0 and I2(.0 .Spruce IMace, all of which aie 50 ’ wide lakeshore lots. 1290 Spruce IMace remains entirely vacant cum iitly. Stall tbeielore finds that combination ol 1280 and 1290, while still non conlonmiig m aica and width, provides a more coiilbrnmig situation than the remaining 50 ’ wide lots to the norlli. I he proposed plans coiilbriil to the height and story re.strictions ol the /.oiiing Ordinance and 005-3076 January m, 2005 l*a|>e 4 of 5 stafT therefore finds no basis to prevent construction of one new residence on two lots (to be combined) when one residence ciinently exists based on simitar past requests and approvals. Conditional Use Permit Analysis A conditional u.sc permit is required for this project due to the existing home’s location and demolition of that structure. Mere restoration of the demolition site requires u conditional use pennit as the structure is within 75 ’ of the lake. The applicants have also proposed to remove all the retaining walls and match the existing grades on cither side. The City Engineer has provided written comments, contained in Exhibit F. Staff would olTer the following comments required for cofiditional use permit approval: Evaluation criteria, A thorough evaluation of the water body and the topographic, vegetation and soils conditions on the site must be made to ensure: a. riic prevention of soil erosion or the po.ssiblc pollution of |)ublic waters, both during and after construction; The City Eiif^inecr has required silt fence during demolition of the existing hou.se site as well as during con.struetion of the new home in an effort to prevent erosion into the lake. This silt fence must remain in place until the site is fully .sodded following construction completion. b. 'fhc visibility of .structures and other facilities as viewed from public waters is limited; The site sits somewhat higher than the elevation at the shoreline. This shall prevent gro.ss negative view impacts from the lake. c. 'fhe site is adequate for water supply and on-site sewage treatment; and A grading plan has been approved by the City Engineer and the site is provided with City sewer. d. fhc types, uses atid numbeis of watercraft that the project will generate are compatible in relation to the suitability of public waters to safely accommodate the.se watercraft. The property, when combined, will be allowed one dock access which shall also act as the sole acce.ss to the shoreline. Staff anticipates all con.struetion vehicles to enter the site from Spruce Place. Ihcrcforc, stall llnds approval of a conditional use permit for grading within 75 ’ of the lake to be acceptable as the demolition site is being restored to match the existing grades on site. l-i iL #05.3076 January IS, 2005 Page 5 of 5 Issues for Consideration 1. Is an approval for a lot area and lot width variance justified based on past approvals? 2. Is the grading proposed within 75* of the lake acceptable? 3. Is the dedication of 10 ’ drainage and utility easements on the side and street lot lines justified? 3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Staff Recommendation Approval of the lot area and lot width variances and a conditional use permit for grading within 75* of the lake subject to the following: 1. Dedication of 10* drainage and utility easements along the side lot lines and street lot line. 2. Implementation of the recommendations of the City Engineer letter dated January 4,2005. 3. Formal combination of 1280 and 1290 Spruce Place prior to building pemiit issuance. Cityorbrono Variance Application SIroot AddroHS 2750 Kciloy Parkwjy Orono, MN 55350 Application# OS ' _ __ Date Received lifiyoy 'JftOO. Main: 952 249 4600 fax: 952-249 4610 Mailing AddiQr,s: P.O. Box CO Cryr.tal Day. MN 5532:-0066 Amount Paid. Staff. Fee: , SOOO ' Renewal: $300 After-the-fact: $1,200 Double f-ee This application form must be completed in full. App .cant will be notified within 15 days ar. to thr> status of the application Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas. PROPERTY INFORMATION:'tSite Address: f^<z> t A _____ Property Identification Number (PIN): 0.ilG ) r t . I*!__( v (Attach legal description to application if not included on the survey.) Date Property Acquired (month/year): ~1 [o<4 □ Yes. I own the adjacent parcels. Present use of property: ^2^esidential □ Other ___________________________ Zoning District; __________________ 0WNl:(L •APPLIC'AN'T INFORMATION: (Complete leqal nares and marital status required for each intorusted parly) Name; V__stcaoajc _H ♦ uj )_____________ ____ Phone (home):f X - - / ys~o Phone (work); - / 3iTo Address: >7p aj. t*aA >?*/• <5 V Email:Fax; APPlUAA/r T wwiJ UP-INFORMATIQN: (Complete legal names £"d ma/jtal staluj required for each inleitjsUid pady) Name: Cfi€t5vjtV—♦—■iTCA*A-jg‘ Phono __ Address: ^Oi ' Email;lail: a l ev n t: orp names c“a mnritai srnius required lor cecn inierr-'su?d P^ny) ________ Phono (work): O _____ 7/VTTC , MNJ ' . Fax:'U... $DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Estimated Project Cost;__________ Describo the request in detail (attach additional sheets if necessary):_____________________________ _. /^V’t- ( -A ; A| ’pl-f lt--jc~ l \rj>l ‘ V/>'U ZlX\J.. ,r: (-; / .Xp’Af-' >___ -ckJtJU-o\i_.L^XpiricTJ..'. ________ Lc4~ ^ >t Lx:^ K-)U3T^-\ > ^.c>tiy:q/vtOOA^:0 | _______________________________________________________________________ \/::2 -ar-'Y': -^<^4--------------------------------------,__-----------------------------------------i____I,L^tia'VtOcr-x._c7 K:« Jic.) q. rr.______ ______________ ___ ______ Lr:/^r:->.. i k1 uiii>(-. kJ<l2JJcd. r fc-’EMov.>cr\o . fif?.- 'i.v * • 1 4. Z''/• - V.. f t •%> « REQUIRED SUBMITTALS: ^ , All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to bo processed. ^ Pre-Application Meeting Form, completed by a City Planner. Completed Application Form Completed Hardship Documentation Foim Certified Property Owners List - owners within 150’ of the subject property, labels and plat map ^ List, labels and map may be obtained from Hennepin County Department of Finance, Government Center. A 603 300 South 6*'’ Street. Minneapolis, telephone 612-348-5910 Original Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor), meeting all the requirements ^ listed within this packet, including hardcover calculations. Also provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or 11" X 17 ” for reproduction. ^ Completed hardcover calculation worksheets (as provided within the variance packet). Topographic sun/cy -- including existing and proposed elevations. Provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or 11" X 17" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views (provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or 11" x 17"). 'n Additional items may be requested by City Staff depending on the scope of the project. * APPLICANT ’S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/oi consultant expenses incurred in review of this application and certifies that the information supplied i? true and correct to the best of his/lter knowledge. The applicant recognizes that he/she is sololjr responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it untUr it is complete or to recommend the request foi denial of the request regardlr^s of its potemial merit. Applicant's Signature: Applicant’s Signature: V J.7:rr=.\Date: Date: 12-lH'O^ OWNER’S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes roasonabli entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents. Commission & Council Members fc purposes of investigation am verification of'this request. X. Dale;Owner ’s Siqnaturo:^.<. Owner ’s Signature: ''Date: Applicant must havd4ll submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commissio Meeting Planning Commission Meetings are normally hold on the third Monday of each monti Applicants must bo present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission an Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements i liave an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant and advise the City Plannr assigned to your project. fi n City of Orono Pre-Application Meeting Form ( This form is to be completed by a City Planner during your pre application meeting.*) Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55366 Main: 952-249-4600 Fax; 952-249 4616 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Dny, MN 55323-0066 For Office Use Only: City Planner:___ _______________ Mooting Onto/Itmo 7«yZ HO AM PC Date _ JM__ ^ . What is the purpose of a pre-appUcation meeting? Pre-application meetings aid the applicant in preparing a complete proposal, inform them of the procedures and requirements of the city code, and identify policies or regulations that croalo opportunities or problems for the proposal. PROPERTY INFORMATION: Site Address:___WbOMo __£ 1\'/ —'})6 :v j col nProperty Identification Nunibor (PIN); r i\~/__ Zoning District: ____________Size oTProperty: ____I -tA\< ' r/; .■ - ,t r- \q '>)-( DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: □ Average Setback □ Side Yard Setback ^^D^Roar Yard Setback Lot Area□^Hardcover £ /fi V □ Lot Coverage tatplher: £.tt J^rr tvj n »• □ Front Yard Setback •^Lot Width Applicant’s Initials: HARDSHIP: Applicant has received the Hardship Documentation Form, understands it as it has been explained to them, and is aware that it must be completed and submitted in conjunction with their formal variance application. OTHER INFORMATION: *Ploaso note: Your variance aoplication will NOT be accepted without a pre-application meeting during which this foriywill be compiyted by City staff. Applicant Signature:^Date: /a-/ tt J ^ EXHIBIT B HARDSHIP DOCUMENTATION FORM 1 of 3 This form is a required submittal for ALL varianco applications. An applicatiCi. Will not b<? considered complete or placed on any rnoelinn agof>das until this form is complete and submitted to the City. Minnesota Stale Statue Section 394.27, Subdivision 7 requites that a liardstup Ije demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted The hardship must be unique to tiio property as variances run with the land and not the land owner PorsonnI nnd economic r.ilwilionr, am nol conHidomd valid hardships In order lor an application to be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council a hardship having merit must bo demonstrated. HOW DO I PROVE A HARDSHIP? This form has 12 points outlinir.g the basis City staff uses to detrvmine if a tia clr.hrp exists and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. 1 o prove a fiardship. address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clear'y as possible. Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the varianco is justified. I ho informalion the City receives is what is used in dclormining a denial or approval recommondalion If you leave something out it will not b*? considered Please address each of these hardship criteria as they relate to the request (some may not apply): 1."The property in question cannot bo put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official coiitieKs :i iJ J_Lvt \' IC.-'/y. i J____________ 2 "The plight of the landowner is duo to circumstances unique to his preporty nol created by the landowner." r^K3|i:"L;L.A.'-.civ lu. l-V.i. . I t..... i t.' - A. t^ c' . /s. I iiu:vL. . An ____________ 'The varianco. if granted, will not niter the essential character of the locality " LO| .‘'.SiV lw A..iMlL_At"' AA3I ‘/td ’ E>lc Vit f . KJl^\rlUU'n;f -lh.k:T r______ _ ............................ ......... "Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship f reasonable use tor the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. lit', '»' I.' •• ^ j M Page 2 of 3 "Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes. Section 116J.06. Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter." nizk "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 7. 8 "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." !-V-- "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." , A_ LxTi^:p__ . I' I/Vj? lU "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located." vC LO ___VWfllU fC IVJ/ctJ AV^HTA. _ r^'xKj.o A't: ' .MAvLLCnf?-'T^.^V ‘O A- v:7i Fplrr<r K\T“-\>s(Aa_LCii.i ’ F:,..Tp aj a* v:7ir-r^» 'The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant" r^WlwjL.U__ir/JtU.i£_i tJ. __L rv/o ri. AJ/c. ,__n _Lkroi:-__ekEp __________________________ "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code " ._i^. .tOtkV- __Ac_,________________________ c _ "t c> ikJ7Ti5o -r c,p ntTr - " of>AJc» Page 3 of 3 12."The granting of such vai.ance will not meroly serve as a convenience to tho applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty." u^r ------— / Utrptiirr AiT'^tg k /'gglr:TE'V::::> yQ LAt^(3 / fvJ__C2S2f^ ---------- Hardship Statement Should you feel the hardship cannot fully be described in tho above criteria, describe the unique hardship, practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if necessary): Ij t -y [ . fi rV- . r- M. : .■*1 ii WALK = 100 RET WALL = 80 TOTAL = 650SF EXISTING HOUSE ...... ).0% ^0/ /%•* l-A •r> V' V CP, LWE=938.8 'o^c ^XlS^ING etDECK- EXI HO 1 IIIG USE ^c-j % /#'' ._ ..^,>-rto > m \\i 1:7b ' ■._ \ \. • \ V .*'1 L/'V V i» • \ '• ' ' ' vv -:± '' \ '• V ‘ ^ PR0'POSEff 'b^h. ^o> ■ ■?, GUSMFSON A.0 o Is.'J ■^S;. \' -, g. \\\W\V i Wffi'.''.\' '\'.1 5. V.Xv,\\.'\\» A"\ W'A'WWl , -' f \ ''. ' > , \ \ V ^ \ i \ A;.>y\\\\4 V \ » N O' C3> VU' ■Eb \ ,A,\\,\ ' \1> N T& . \ V-'^A \ A*'■ \ ' PERGOIA^ \ ^V . :-•• f ' 0 ,.c. - owf-''*' \^ ' '8° ^ ^ V - ~ . BENCHMARK . -V " ' --TOP IRON PIPE ELEV = 953.0 SCALE IN ^ ' fN - X •a'A'' ■ -.-69 '04;' e \ existing HOUSE \ PROPOSED ELEVATIONS GARAGE FLOOR=948.0 = EXISTING SPOT ELEVA X(998 0) = PROPOSED SPOT ELEV ^ = DIRECTION SURFACE Df LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 3 & 4. BLOCK 10. SAGE HILL REVISED HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN. ADDRESS - 1280 SPRUCE PLACE PID# 08-117-23-32-0014 A nnoroo ioor\ onoi ir^r ni a/>r r .- - -'--* v?*.,ur4 • EXHIBIT D /^ilft.liiv^s. '||■:II■■ in^\~ ^0 tt«-JIIM JitkVitia Ilia itta '^\ mC ------------------------ ■—- ^ \ ta ,i,«T3,i, a U4B^canria IBR8B■ na maniiB na ■ iL«a irta lut ii« laniia uia ni tm Mia lira >i>a t la Ilia iiia irta laa a Ilia DIB Dll I,I ta Dia iria in ■ ii Ilia iiiannan ••• a la tiiBiiit'>^Bi St::: BBIBB BIlBSIBB la iia iiiai'iB'tia III! iMB Ilia iiia>ri I III aBiianitariitaii -^r«ainifiiu*. IBDIB Ilia f II8LII HBBi rrt»4i 1 -IB-I-* M1 J , IB mai I iia till Kiami I liia II la Ilia' liB nil . Ilia iti aTiKtyasKHsasi 1 a 0-Wgff.l A^dutt • iia III BB IIHII BB■ ■■■■ iia jiia.iiia iiia'iiia:iiia'fi«a 111! ‘='•"*¥8 98 fifcf^ i I I I I I I I .... ■ ■H ■ ■ r;v.7af lua I ----------------------------------------------ilia iia %rZ I'liia/iia'jiia.iiia iiia'iiia:iiia'fi«a Ilia jiiB n la Ilia uiBiuiamia Mia iiia iiian.ia Jiiamai iia iiiiJiia liia.iiia jiia ina niajiia lua rii I'-v [BjiBlIBl■ MaiHniiaii^ ■ mil' am ■•'IliaI ■■ null BB BH (• x* ■ I I iMiliiiiii liji - 9iia Ilia Ilia jtia nia.iiia majiita iua itia iii ■" I MiB Ilia iiiajija' --------^T^itaiiiianiiaikiiani • » Biuiawl® Bj,., B I II a ^ ^ " lama^uainaniianiaani I IB >118 DIB in'- IbRbb iiSii iiifli■iiiii »i»a iu« ii>« MiaatiiaTiii ifiiiuitaipita f Uf« llt« Ilivnctft U9«M IB II »a-4c«a liAa ti«a it«a laaoMaf la'i'ta i«««‘V'ra'Yr«arfTi«^r«sm9a*ina'inanrta •tianiiamia iita’ina uia i ia iiianiia.iiiaiiii • ->■■ ■ Jif W I ITB->n nr.« 18 Ilia ma nia iiibmanna iiiami ma>i II a in anna Ilia no a Ilia mam S! SB BB BB ■iiii ini iiiaiiii I Ilia l:l a Ilia I ia II a ina nia itia.nia ifianiiamanna «.v« la-nia ina inannaiinaufia iiianii luiia >MarktiB.iMainia:m nrta iia iiiB Ilia uia ma.ma ina niatii BiiiianiiBnnaMnamiBiti ■ ml miamaniia'iiia ma ma nia jiibi na itia nta Jitsmiamian i.::as nasiliillililili Ii i.ui< kiiiii inaajia ntaiitia.ii«aina mar ibiub iitawna jjianiana >a u amaiiiia iiia ma tnantaannamia ma matwiajaa titaans ifi »■" *-»Y* Mil Ilia < L Va III Ktf 4<ia>^iia Ilia n I iia Ilia iitf Ilia naI •laaifa uia ma h«i inta ®-«5 ^v.^l'.; ii«» *««prt • a • t a« « a^ «a»» »«« '«• a#k«a«a • %« ««4 *a«aaM EXHIBIT E r • to I AM mm < • • r««f • •• i«#« fV«» »«t "%i •«• •»:« 1 I r 1 © r □ □ sS^J _ I t. M«M«u«r rtmt9i • <*•«>• M> •••4 '•I >••••« li i I ► Mn 0 s C»TV OF ORON( KXHIUITF Mf M BonCStrOO Highway 36 • Si. Paul. MN S5II3 MM IfQscne Office: 65P636-4600 • Fax 6SI'636'I3II WT]|| Anddiik & www bonestroo com ^ I Associates Engineeri & ArcMtects January 4,2005 Ms. Janice Gundlach Planner Cily ofOrono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN SS323 Re: 1280/1290 Spruce Place File No. 139-05-000 Plat No. 05-3076 Dear Janice: We have reviewed the proposed grading plan for the property located at 1280/1290 Spruce Place. The plans propose to remove an existing house and the associated hard cover and construct a new home on the site. The proposed plans include the necessary grading to construct the house and remove the existing structures. We have the following comments with regards to engineering matters: • Retaining walls that exceed 4-fcet in height require a separate engineering design and detail for review and approval. • Tlie left home elevation docs not agree with the proposed grading plan. Elevations shown on the grading plan along the north (left) side of the home range from 946 to 947.5. The left home elevation shows a proposed berm or fill area adjacent to the home. The house elevation should be revised to agree with the grading plan. • The grading plan should include a detailed erosion and sediment control plan. The erosion and sediment control plan should be submitted for review and approval prior to the final grading plan approval. • All erosion control measures should be installed, inspected and approved by city staff prior to any work on site. If you have any questions plca.se call me at (651) 604-4863. Youra very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENR, ANDF.RLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Cc: Cleg Gappa, City of Orono Bruce Vang, City of Orono • Sr. Paul. Sr. Cloud. Rochester, Willmar. MN • Milwaukee. Wl • Chicago. IL AfftPfiMllw Arhon/Equ«l OpporturMi|r EmpJoyet m%d Employ** Own*d Tijy L.^ rra. V.'. '-Cv T‘^ • ‘ \ • ^ m.i V" - I -"‘‘rf ■!••:' “■ ■ T ' ■■>, * .f f.\ l^v'. • ,' '>■... •. i: - ; iW'i’ 1=5L- - ' ' •. • ' •. ' iiT: .u r : « ■ ’i ■ -^ •. > vW'-'- \'m • “ '» ^?7' . ;■ ' ■ ■ ^ . V*^- < , '■"»' \’,'M,iri HiS I',' *^A^V A \ '€ •?! r ->-1 JTVf; •'r< s V .*• 2S.,?S*\. ' ';• < -?v yS^r-tfV'v- -r- ‘I-r ’ V :y^ r ’^:W'. '•v ^bkVm. V I \-m ■ 3 T' —'■w -*‘. •r ■ ■ '-■ *' ;^VA-■ ••-<<'■. .' ^'r»,i^ , > . v .'sT^- ; -?-4 •'-r ■V*??:--- ■ ■-.' i'ijf*'-.'; -“-^>'.v , ■ • ■ ., -*vi * —r~!.^1 • ■ * • *' ' I,. • *•* . ✓, -> V. ' r A- , ; 4?V 1 ■' ■ '* ■ ■ • *'-i*if f 1 ** mmi ■ •:,N'r-rT*4i|® >• • ’ • - 4 • N ' » .*> V-l V- i '• - - vMj- ^M^ii^BPIRflfiPi^* Oi;IQ RUN DATE: 12^6(2004 38 071172341 PROPADDR 1305 SPRUCE OWNER NAME CLAYTON R I TAXPAYER CLAYTON R I NAME/ADDR 1305 SPRUCE MOUND MN 38 071172341 PROPADDR 1295 SPRUCE OWNER NAME HENNEPIN FC TAXPAYER CITYOFORO NAME/ADDR POBOX 66 CRYSTAL BA PROPADDR 38 081172332 1270 SPRUCE OWNER NAME ELAINE E ERt TAXPAYER ELAINE EERl NAME/ADDR 1270 SPRUCE MOUND MN PROP ADDR 38 081172332 1300 SPRUCE OWNER NAME WATER STRE TAXPAYER WATER STRE NAME/ADDR 4M 2ND ST 81 EXCELSIOR ^ ^7 5 ¥ ‘jz'jr:. .Vf r RUN DATE: \y\(JtM 38 07II7234IOOSI PROPADDR 1303 SPRUCE PL OWNER NAME CLAYTON R FUCHS TAXPAYER CLAYTON R FUCHS NAME/ADOR 1305 SPRUCE PL MOUND MN 35364 31 0711723410078 PROPADDR 1295 SPRUCE PL OWNER NAME HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND TAXPAYER CITY OF ORONO NAME/ADDR POBOX66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 0811723320013 PROPADDR 1270 SPRUCE PL OWNER NAME ELAINE E ERICKSON TRUSTEE TAXPAYER ELAINE E ERICKSON NAME/ADDR 1270 SPRUCE PL MOUND MN 53364 38 0811723320016 PROPADDR 1300 SPRUCE PL OWNER NAME WATER STREET HOMES LLC TAXPAY FR WATER STREET HOMES LLC NAME/ADDR 464 2NDST«I05 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 a * • • • / ' EXHIBIT H HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 0711723410076 PROPADDR 1254 LOMAUNDAAVE OWNER NAME K L HOFFMANN & LS HOFFMANN TAXPAYER KENNETH L&LINDAS HOFFMANN N/VME/ADDR 13*4 LOMA LINDA AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 07II7234I0077 PROPADDR 1254 LOMA LINDA AVE OWNER NAME K L HOFFMANN & L S HOFFMANN TAXPAYER KENNETH L & LINDA S HOFFMANN NAME/ADDR 1254 LOMA LINDA AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 Oil 1723320008 PROPADDR 1250 SPRUCE PL OWNER NAME J B EASLEY & M 3 EASLEY TAXPAYER JAMES B & MEUSSA J EASLEY NAME/ADDR 1250 SPRUCE PL MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723320012 PROP AODR 1260 SPRUCE PL OWNER NAME E A ANDERSON ET AL TRUSTEES TAXPAYER tVAN A ANDtRSON NAME/ADDR 1260 SPRUCE PL MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723320014 PROPADDR 1280 SPRUCE PL OWNER NAME G D CUSTAFSON/J S GUSTAFSON TAXPAYER GREGORY D/JEANNE S GUS1AFSON NAME/ADDR 7723 GLEASON RD EDINA MN 55439 38 O8II7233200I5 PROPADDR 1290 SPRUCE PL OWNER NAME G D CUSTAFSON/J S GUSTAFSON TAXPAYER GREGORY D/JEANNE S GUSTAFSON NAME/ADDR 7723 GLEASON RO EDINA MN 5543'? 38 0811723320017 PROPADDR I3I0 SPRUCE PL OWNER NAME TERRI LJENSTAD TAXPAYER TERRI LJENSTAD NAME/ADDR 18315 8TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55447 3P 0811723320018 PROPADDR IJI8 SPRUCE PL OWNER NAME PATRICIA A GROETKEN T/OCPAYER PATRICIA A WALKER NAME/ADDR HI* SPRUCE PLACE MOUND MN 55364 I CERTIFY THAI THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORD OFTHE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAXPAYER SER OF MY KNOWuEIXiE AND BELIEF. j DATE UIN AD 11 Al rf-AKD 1 MID UAi r. I nc wn SERViaiS DtPARlMENT. lOIHi: •. • *r EXHIBIT I Hennepin Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Department TOO f, (91 p .1 I# # # * * * ****** ^ * m • - • - - - ' /r/ARK \ \o 4 V-\r92;, s07-117-23-41 8 ^ 75/ J . ^Parcel Information Piirc*l ID 0811723320015 Houm Number 1290 Street Name SPRUCE PL JNs la nol a legally racofdad map. It representa a compilation of Information erxl data from Oty, County, and Stale road authoritna and other aoutcea. F . *; k DATR: January 21,200S ITRM NO: KKQIJRST FOR COUNCIL ACTION JAN 2 4 200S 8 CIlYOh OHONU Department Approval: Name Ronald J. Moomo Tiite City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Rc|>oi1 Item Description Navarre Fire Statidn Change Order No. 2, and Request for Payment No. 9 (Final) ‘Hie construction of Uie Navarre l<irc Station is now fully complete, and llic (Senurul Contractor is requesting ilnol payment. Along with the final payment request, tlicre is u final ctiange order (No. 2) in the amount of $12,460. The change order rclulus to a number of items tliat were identifted as necc.ssury during the construction process. Ihcse include an eyewash station, adding cican-outs to overflow roof drains, ini.scellancous electrical chtuigcs, and furnishing and installing a shop air compressor. It is recommended change order No. 2 be approved. Final Payment and SCDA Air Compressor The request for final payment is in the amount of $41,181.00. Altliough the fire .station is complete and operational, there is an outstanding i.ssue regarding the payment of the supplier of the SCMA Air Compre.ssor. The SCHA uir compressor was supplied to the mechunicul sulicontructor, who has received payment for the work related to the compres.sor. However, the mechanical subcontractor has filed for bankruptcy, and has not paid the supplier of the comprc.s.sor. Until this i.ssue is resolved in a way that ensures the City will not have tuiy involvement in making payment to the supplier, it is rccoimncndcd tliat $21,181.00 of the final payment request amount be withheld. COUNCIL ACIiON RKQURSTRD Motion to approve chmige order No. 2, and request for payment No. 9, for the Navarre Fire Station, with the condition that $21,181.00 of the payment rc(|ucst omoimt l)c witldield until tlic S('HA uir coinpre.s.sor |uiymcut issue is re.solved to the sjitisfaction of the City. h ' Constructive Ideas t’lanninp, /k Prrrnnslruclion Services • Project Cost Analysis • CPM Sc't>diilinp, Scjitciiibcr 29,2004 ocr 1 2004 cnyojoiio/y(Q Mr. Hon Moorsc, City A(lmiiiistrat«»r (’ily ofOrono 2750 Kelly Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55.12.1 Kc: Navarre Pirc Slalioii Cliaii};e Order No. 2 Rc(|ucst for Payment No. 9 Dear Ron: Attached is the documentation for Cliany.c ()r«lcr N;>. 2, tind Kc(]ucst for Payment No. 9 on the Navalic Fire .Station. Thcfic Ih.,c been reviewcil and signed by both the architect uiul the contractor on tlic project, Plcn.se have the chanp.c orilcr signed and return one copy to the nchitix t and contractor for their lilrs. Payment rctiucst No. 9 is lor Ihiul payment on th ^ p.njcct. I assume that the project is functioning satisfactorily and that tiu re arc no known problcnu.. If thi.? is the ca.se, I think (inal payment is in order. It you have any qucstioiw, please contact me. .Sinccicly, CONSTRUrriVP IDIiA.S. INC. William A. Wolters Pi csidcnl /oww P.iK’losure '<<1! irlfmoii Avenue..Suilo »«/• St I’mil. MN ,VSin2 • ^ftM) 72.S 4/4.). |.nx (ojI) 12'> 17.11 WWW cofi\iM.ri(vciilrAMrH' run m •• 0 • mm i ORDER \ ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR FIELD OTHER AIA DOCUMENT 0701 THIO IXX:UMENT HAS IMI*ORTANT LLOAl.CONnrOUrNCrn; CONSUITAIION WIIH AN At lOMNt-Y IS t-NCOimAr.Ht WIIM NllJ'il'LCr TO ITS COMPi LTION on MOOIFICATION. AUTHENTICATION Of THIS ELl'CmONICAl.I.Y OnAI TH) AIA tHKIUMI NT MAY lit-: MADI IIY lir.INC. AIA I)TK:UMI NT 1)401. PROJECT: Navarro FIro Station 37/0 Shor«llnfi Orlva Orono, Minnesota SS3S6 CHANGE ORDER NO.TWO (2) DATE:Soplembor 1,2004 TO CONTRACTOR: DEW Corporation 2125 Conlury Avonuo North SI. 1'aul.MN 6510? ARCHDECT’S PROJECT $: 1124.10 CONTRACT DATE: CONTRACT FOR:Gonorot Construction Dio conliiM.I In dmnuitd iin follovYs; I. PR /A(l( I oynvYosh slaflon, cliaruio vont ilzo $2255.00 ^ 1. PRO |OC COK#22 )ITovldo connocflons to Rollol Ilooci (Rll I) and Intake I toed (IIII) $ .T22.(X) i. PR N (GC CORH20 )Add colllnn Ian.%352.00 / 1. PR 15 (GC COR42I) Cluiiifin conliol'i loi TF 3. ». AShl Cloilllcolion til ii<n pi|>inu< 1. ASI /(Tciiily Npecilic.olioM on nIio|» air «ov.of. G(' GORIM.5 Adil PVf! jncknliiia |o piolnrl Jilpn lnMil<ilif)H I, (;C (■;( )R« 17. liiinWi A Imloll S( ;itA Syviom («(: C( iRif IV Ai If 1 < Ini inouh lo ovoillow roof drains $ $ $ % % % 3. GC COHUV S LIncIfIcal chann^s 4. GC CUI\ffi^4 ronofrallon and diicf woik lor dryf?r vc?iil !». GC COKII j’.*) (?) (idditionol uwnoi r(H)iir\lmi Inno looK A. G(! COR#?A hiiiiKh As Imn I(iII shop nir (omprmsoi $ % I I 911.00 No ('ml. Ni) t'osl. 0,00 0.00 4.55^(X). I 2/3.(X) 429.00. OCX). 2J62.IX).' >lul of Homs # I * # 14 of C.o. #2 12460(0 \! f 74« I ca Ihi ^V T )/^inift I k x; i 4 • «IW WMIM Net changn by prevtously auihofizod Change Orders The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order was The Contract Sum will be increased by this change order In the amount of rhe new Contract Sum Including this Change Order will be a l,IOO,UUU.UU $ 10,857.00 $ 1,148,857.00 $ 12,460.00 $ 1,161,317.00 The Contract time will be unchanged by this Change Order. rhe date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore Is December IS, 2003 >IOTE: This summary does not reflect changes In the Contract Sum, Contract Time or Guaranteed Maximum Price which lave been authorized by Construction Change Directive.___________________ Xuthorized: ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR loarman Kroos Vogel Group, Inc. VddfMS !22 N. 2nd Street dim OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE rationDEWCk Address 2125 Century Avenue North St.Pqp^f^55 BY City of Orono Address 2750 Kelly Parkway Orono, Minnesota 553S6 BY DSTF lA DOCUMENT Ortll * CHANGE OROEIt • 1SS7 EDITION * AIA - COPYRIGHT 1087 * ------------- ^AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ^CtfreCT^, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON. D.C. 20006-5292 '*’®®***** pbolooopyInQ vtolain U.S. oopyrtglil law and Is aul^act lo legal proeacuUon. TWs documont was electronically produced wllh permission fihe AIA and cannot be reprorkioedwIthomvtolallonunBllhedste or expirallon noted below.___________________________ r-'•<r—♦- %• '• PAYMENT APPLICATION TO; CHyolOrono 2790KaaeyPartnny Orano. MN 66336 Alin; Aooounia Payabi* FROM: DawCorpofMon 212SCanturyAvanue North St F^ul. MN 85109 FOR; CONTRACTOR'S SUMMARY OF WORK Appicaton la mada for paymant aa ahonwi balow. ConVnuaUon Paga la atlachad. 1. CONTRACT AMOUNT 2. SUM OF AL4. CHANGE ORDERS 3. CURRENT CONTRACT AMOUNT 4. TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED (Coiumi G on Continuation Page) S RETAINAOE: 8. 0.00% ofCompleled Work (Coiumna O ^ b on ContliHiation Page) —— b. 0.00% o( Matartal Slotad (Column F on ConflnuaDon Page) Total Retalnage (Line Sa ♦ 9b or Column I on Continuation Page) 6. TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED LESS RETAINAOE (Una 4 mlnua Line 9 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENT APPUCATIONS (Ut» 6 from prior Applcatlon) 8. PAYMENT DUE 9 BALANCE TO COMPLETION (Une 3 mlnua Una 6) 30.00 (Una 1 2) PROJECT 03005 name AND LOCATION: 3770'S700 Shoreline Drive Oronr>. MN 89330 ARCHITECT: BKV Group, Inc. 222N.2ndSL MlnnaapoHa, MN SS401 Page 1 APPLICATION i PERIOD THRU; PROJECT ia: DATE OF CONTRACT: 9 DisMiutlon to: 0»23«004 (2 OWNER B architect 07/C1/2003 E contractor □□ 31.136.000,00 323.317.00 31.161.317.00 31.161.317.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 31.161.31700 31.120.136 00 341,161.00 SUMMARY OF CHANGE ORDERS'_____ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS 1Total changes approved In i pravlaus months 323,317.00 $0.00 Totftf ipproYBd this month $6.00 $0.00 TOTALS 323.317.00 t6.db NET CHANGES 323.317.00 PAYMENT APPLICATION CONTRACTOR: By;Date: Robert S. Dew, Ptaaldenl State of: Minnesota County of: Ramsey Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9th day of July 2004 Notary Public; Tammy Nelson My Commission Expires: January 31.2005 07/09/2004 TAMMY J NELSON NOTARY PUBLIC • MMNESOTA My Cianbawljpaii Jan. 31.2005 \ ARCHITECrS CERTiFICAT CERTFIEO AMOUNT.------ ••••••♦•••••••••••••••••• negottabMT Payment ^ udice to any righia of Owner or Contractor under OSS. INC. DOCUMENT CONTINUATION PAGE Page 2 of 3 PROJECT: Paymenl Application oontainlno Coniniclof'a algnalura Is ailachad. 03005 Naraire Fire Station ITEM « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 25 27 25 29 B WORK DESCRIPTION General CandKk)ra Bonds Earttnvorfc StteUttlSes Asphalt Paving Site Concrete Landscaping Concrete Masonry Precast Concrete Arch Precast Steel Fabricalion Steel ErecOon Rough Carpentry Mitiwork Waterproofing Rrwfing Caulking HM/Doors/Hardwaro Overhead Doors Al. Clad Wood WlndoM Al. Glass & Glazing Ceramic Tie AcousUcel CeRIng Tile Epoxy Flooring Carpel/Reellionl Pain5r)g Tolel Partmons ToM Aooessortes SUB-TOTALS SCHEDULED AMOUNT $126,667.50 $9,004.00 $25,645.00 $11,900.00 $16,857.00 $4,050.00 $17.55Z00 $41,200.00 $241,700.00 $9,283.00 $11,715.00 $35,696.00 $8,700.00 $35.323 00 $13,102.00 $6.400 00 $40,040.00 $3,657.00 $9,345.00 $5,919.00 $9,052.00 $11,400.00 $7,130.00 $2,640.00 $11,500.00 $6,339.00 $11,176 00 $711.00 $2,140.00 $747,404.50 APPLICATION #: DATE OF APPLICATION; PERIOD THRU: PROJECT as: 0 06/23/2004 06/23/2004 D I E COMPLETED WORK AMOUNT PREVIOUS PERIODS $126,657.50 $0,004.00 $25,645.00 $11,900.00 $16,657.00 $4.950 00 $17,582.00 $41,200.00 $241,700.00 $9,283.00 $11,715.00 $35,696.00 $8,700.00 $35,323.00 $V 1,102.00 $6,400.00 $46,840.00 $3,657.00 $9,345.00 $5,019.00 $9,052.00 $11,400.00 $7,130.00 $2,640.00 $11,500.00 $6,330.00 $11,178.00 $711.00 $2 .00 $747,494.50 AMOUNT THIS PERIOD $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 $0.00 $0 00 $0 00 $0.00 $0 00 $0 00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 so.oo CONTINUATION PAGE FOR PAYMENT APPLICATION STORED’ MATERIALS (NOT IN 0 OR E) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 $0.00 TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED (D ♦ E ♦ F) $126,687.50 $9,994 00 $25,645.00 $11,900.00 $16.857 00 $4,950.00 $17,582.00 $41,200.00 $241,700.00 $9,283.00 $11,715.00 $35,696.00 $8.700 00 $35.323 00 $13,102.00 $6.400 00 $46.84000 $3,657.00 $9.34500 $5.919 00 $9,952.00 $11,409.00 $7,130.00 $2,640.00 $11,500.00 $6,339.00 $11,178.00 $711.00 $2,140.00 $747,494.50 PERCENT COMPLETE (O/C) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1001$ 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% BALANCE TO COMPLETION (C-G) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $000 $0.00 $0 00 $0 00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 RETAINAGE OF VARIABLE) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 $0 00 $0.00 $0 00 $0 00 $0.00 $0 00 $0 00 $0 00 $0 00 $0 00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 OSS. INC. DOCUMENT CONTINUATfON PAGE Page 3 of 3 PROJECT: Piymeni ApfilicMon containing Conttadofa algnahra fai attached. 03005 Navane Rre Station ITEM 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 36 30 40 41 42 43 44 WORK DESCRIPTION Lockera Louver* VlaualOtaptay Boards FIra Estlneulshara MItc. Spadalltas Floor Mato IdanUfytno Oavtce* Raaldantial Appliance* Cran* Window Bilnda ' • Machanical PIra Protocllori ■ Electilcal COffi CO«2 SCHEDULED AMOUNT 174160.00 1244.00 $812.00 1350.00 1060.00 11.015.00 17.554.00 $4,486.00 $6.700 50 $1,655.00 $236,000.00 $12,560.00 $110,000.00 $10,857.00 $12,460.00 i application n DATE OF APPLICATION PERIOD THRU PROJECTS 06/23/2004 06/23/2004 COMPLETED WORK AMOUNT PREVIOUS PERIODS $7,260.00 $244.00 $812.00 $350.00 $060.00 $1,015.00 $7,554.00 $4,466.00 $6,700.50 $1,655.06 $236,000.00 $12,560.00 $110,000.00 $10,867.00 $0.00 AMOUNT THIS PERIOD STORED MATERIALS (NOT INDORE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $12,460.00 CONTINUATION PAGE FOR PAYMENT APPLICATION $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 $0 00 $0.00 $000 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 $0.00 TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED P*E-»F) $7,260.00 $244.00 $812.00 $350.00 $960.00 $1,015.00 $7,554.00 $4,466 00 $6,709.50 $1,655.00 $236,000.00 $12.560 00 $110,000.00 •10.857.00 $12,460.00 PERCENT COMPLETE (G/C) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% BALANCE TO COMPLETION «>G) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $000 $0 00 $0 00 $0.00 $0 00 $0 00 $0.00 I RETAINAGE (IF VARIABLE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 $0 00 $0.00 $0 00 $o.u) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 OSS. INC. DOCUMENT DATE: January 21,2005 ITEM NO: g REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION r'O****^** • riiMQ JAN I 4 2005 ciir ur OM'j.NU Department Approval: Name Ronald J. Moone THIe City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: ___________________________________________________^ Item Description Dakota Rail Trail-Resolution Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report The Dakota Rail Corridor is tiow under the ownership of the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority. The rails and ties have been removed from the ct>rridor. The attached resolution encourages the IICRRA to ex{>cdite the development of a regional recreational trail on tlic corridor COUNCIL ACTION REQUES TED Motion to adopt the attached resolution encouraging the I ICRRA to expedite the development of a regional recreational trail on the Dakota Rail corridor. b ■ ^ i A KKSOIAJTION KNCX)URAC;iNC; THK HENNEPIN COUNTY RRCIONAI. RAII.ROAH AU rilORI'I'Y ro EXPEDITE THE DEVEI.OPIVIEN r OK A RECREATIONAI. I'RAIC ON THE DAKOTA RAIL CORRIDOR WHEREAS, (he lloniicpin County Rcp.ionat Riiilrond Authority now has ownership of (he Dakota Kail (’orridor; and WHEREAS, (he rails and tics have been removed from (he coiridor; and WHEREAS, (he cuncut condition of the corridor creates confusion about public use of the corridor; and WHEREAS, the expedited development of a rep.ional recreational trail on (he corridor would clarify (he use of (he corridor, would discoiii a^'c further encroachments milo the (rail, and would provide (ho unique aitd valuable recreational and traiisportalioii hcncfits that only (his corridor can provide (o this area. NOW, THERKKORE, HE IT RESOLVED, (hat the Orouo City Council docs hereby strongly encourage (he I leiuicpin (’ounty Regional Railroad Authority to expedite (he development of a regional rcct cational trail on (he Dakota Kail Corridor. Adopted by the City Council o( the (,‘ity of Orouo, Minnc.sota at a regular meeting held on January 24, 2005. AITHS'I': Linda S. Vcc, City Clerk Itaibaia A. Rcicison, Mayor Page I of I i i REQUEST FOR COUNf.'ll. ACI ION jAfi Z A 200S t.iir oi- OMONO DA’I'K: Jiiimaiy 21,2005 ITKM NO: 10 Dcpnrlmcnt Approval: Name I.ln Vee TIHa (.ilyCIcik 7 Adminiirfrator Reviewed:m Agenda Scelion: I.icCllilCA Hem Deacriptlon: Ust of licenses forCjMncil Approval C:OMIV1ERriAI, KENNEL LICENSE I. I). Mriaii I'lilmcr 3505 Way/ulu lioulcvord West KRSIDRNTIAI. KRNNKI. I.ICRNSR 2. Koboccu Field 1729 North F’anii Roud 7. Kohin Kdbaiic 495 Oxford Rtrail 3. Kevin Garnett 450 Oroim Ordnud Road S<MltIi K. Jane Klinc/Steve Hell 4455 West Mraiicb Road 4. Jim and Judy I lutclictt K4U North Shoio Drive 9. Jim and Jennifer Matiisovsky 1290 l^)inn l.imla Avenue 5. I )avid/ir, licidi I Inst 45 Smith Avenue lO, l.uAnn and David Runklo 20K4 ('a:eo Point Roail 6. Colleen Jabhunr 9H5 '1‘otikawa Roud ANNUAL LIQUOR I.ICRNSRS 11. Club On Sale tuui Sunday I .i(|uoi- SprinKlIilKiolfClub Tom Daliiin 725 Sixth Avenue Nortii SPECIAL EVEN I 12. Appli(‘anl; Hvent: I x)eu(iun: Dale: Time: Wells F’juko Hank Way/ata Wells l•■alp,o Half Maiaihon Hcnin: Wells I miiko Hank Wayzata. I Jikc Sticct to Fcindalc Road to (^mnly Road 15 t<» Orono On hard Road to Fox Street to Old Ciystal Hay Roatl to ( ■ounly Road 51 to County Road 19 to ('lystal Hay Road to Nm thview Road to hike Roud to County Roud 15 to Old Heach Road to t:uunly Roatl 19 to Hcehilo Avenue to the Soutliwest I.RT frail to Water Street. Finish: Wells F'arKo Honk I'.xeelsioi Sunday, May 1,2005 8:00 a.m. 11 ;(H) a.m. {i 1 JAst of Licenses for Council Approval January 21, 2005 Paf>c 2 TOBACCO IJCKNSK 13. I Jikeviow Golf of Oroiio, Inc. Grant WenkNturn 405 Nortli Ann Drive 14. Narrows Saloon Jiuncs Anderst 3380 Slioielino Drive 15. Navarre Cilgo l«Koy Kochiicn 3360 Stiurcline Drive 16. Navarro Liquors Inc. Steven Corl 3421 Shoreline Drive 17. O'SullivaoN Holiday Jolui O’Sullivan 2420 Shadywood Road COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approvc/deny the above listed liccii.sc.H. 18. O’Sullivans Holiday John O’Sulliviui 3340 Shoreline Drive 19. Kick’s Market Von Margin 3333 Shoreline Drive 2u. Spring Hill Golf Club Toni Daluin 725 Sixth Avenue North 21. Way/ala Country i3ub Richard Kohn 200 Way/ala Houlevard West 22. Western Convenience Store Mohaincd Hainoiidc 2160 Way/ala lluulevnrd Wexst ^...........I I //so tirltry I'jilwav 14 /iT-' /■# Oy'ullUy.MN^Mn roH < Kcnm l ImiWTicd llv Dale liiipfUfil Krroniinfndi Aj*j»M»vj| IVilijtlJ Q ORONO KKNNKM.irKNSK AITI .ICATION I’dcxiivc Jamiaty I, ?0()5 to December 31, 2005 Ownri: ___________ ________________ ___ Pioi)rHyA(Mirv. g<3Ng Ihl♦ \M (indiidc city nnd /tp) Mailiiiji Ad(lir..',5 (ildiffcicnl): _________________ riiuiic; (lu)ine) (w‘»k) - ^CW2Ul^>___________ RKSIDKNTIAl.Kriinill.Irnisr Per: S2f>.0f) - »^/V- (piiyinnil mir.t tircompmiy iipplinitKv*)) Mnxmmin W of lioRS to hr krpt nt one hinr:____ MAxirrium of cats to be kept at one time: Piint:ipal nierd(x): ^ ______________„„ Piiipo ir foi nioic lluiii 7. ilo[»s/cals:__________________ Dnp.s noitiiiilly kept: iiiMtlc____kennel Ktructuro C!atj» iiomuilly kept: _ iiiKitlc kennel slinctinc rOMMKUnAI. Keiiiirl Merine i re: Slf>rMH) (payment mnnt nccoinpnny npplic iition) Name ol nu*jinc!»s: '^^t£jDOCr>H PC- lln!;inr.ss Activities; (o'^er 6 months of np^r) _ (over 6 months ofap.c) : ^^-CWk£c>l*:3C^^ G:«'rON\»Oro, 31. (cxiimplc* l>oai((inf*, larcdinp., vrteimaiy caie, »rtail, etc ' ^ NoiitiBl Uiismcns llnmv (^Aci4 «" 'C:iVVV^ A Itri 11(11115 C'ontmd; (iimnc) Ari (plionr) I)op, Iiiri.'Jcxcici:.o mch.s me:inside outsiile IhUIi llie ninlei sipjird Itnrby makes npphc:atmn to the ()iono (?ily (!ouiu:il lot a Kennel 1 .in nne an niHT.iiird on Otis lofin, the iiinieiMp.ned m knnwlrilprn Hint a kennel license is pet missive only and does not piaul any millumly to violate any pioviraoii of any ( aty Oidmancc oi olhra law oi irp.ulatmn. the nndeiMp.ncd lieicliy plants the ( ity |)rinasMtiii to iiisprct the. p. -iiases ptiot to license nppioval and at any othri irasonahle tune diiiinp the In rnsr dotniioii, nnd tlir nndetsignrd npiees to alndr by the iripnieinenln o| Mnincuwl Code ('haptci 62 Alin le 111, Division inciuding any S|X!Cial conditions imposed by Uic City Council as pait of any krimrl hi raise a| mi ovalc a| mi oval Apphenn!Date Co TiC-- -^ry\r FRtll : FltLD PHONE NO. : 612 4752244 J.m. 06 2005 03:17H1 PI Rk(’.wa?x r/»XrfMfPwt™«y ll /fV<3lr^^ C»52)J4V4«W FOR %mnm\ Imp—Uy! DuMlfiipwitd: lUeowwt nJ* A pd »o^M^-------OSSSlGL ORONO KENNEL UCENSE APPLICATION Effective Januaiy 1,2005 toDccorobor 31,2003 o««r _R e^bf^fxk 3. ____________----------:; (include city and zip) Mailing Audnraa (if diflatant): Phone: (bome)^S^^.Z£:i-? Vii,(work) REWUBNTlALKwiielMceeaePe*: S2S.00 (paynmtt must acoomiMny application) Maximum # of dogs to bo kept at one time; „ Maximum <1 of cats to bo kept ■* 00® - (over <5 months of ngo) (ovw 6 months of ago) Principal HrcodC); Putposo fbr mom than 2 doga/cota:---- ' — Duipi iHMiiMdly kept: kon»«l atmotum Cats normally kept: . . Inside___ konnol atnicture rOMMEBCIAL Kami** IJrmwm P«a: $150.00 (payment must accompany appUontion) NomeorBinlncm: ---------- -------------------------------------------------- Uusinesi AotIviUos:(oxampicr Iwarding, broediug. veteriniay care, i^i. dc.) Nutrnal Rusinnn 1 lutnS' --------------- Alter Hour? Contad: (nmne)_____ (phona)____ tnitAido boll?I X>g r?«nr»/oxorclBO aioa.s are; ___inside__ to vioWo^if division of any City Ontlnance or other law or re8?datl««; rnrtpTnr ft J Article HI. Divi.sion 1: Including any specal condUions imposed by tie Uty t ounul as pai u •f\y ki*tinol liceiiNe tpproval. -----------------------------AppHoant ^oT Clly of Orono po"no« Mi }1S0 Kclify HaiVwfcv C fy^Ul llpy, MN 553'3 (gs7)34y ir/K) ^ s m4 K<)H m\MUSKjlJ^I^ ^RC A/0. KcfMii;! Injpcued n,n_ Oilc Inipft trit Hecnmmcnfl^: ............ Aiyim^ai O* ___ __Denial QJ Q) ORONO KENNEL I U F.NSE APPMCAI ION ItiTrctivc January 1,2003 to December 31 2003 Owner: ___—------------------------------------r-----------------------' j - ! I’lopcrty Adtlrcss; ___Ql^^O .^'0 __^ -—t - ^ ‘i (include city iind /ip) i MnilniR Address (if dillncnt); C / __j *'> f Phone: (home) (n(1 %^.UlL____(work) -------- (^\X- 7rH- KKSIDKNTIAL Kennel License IVo- S2f*.00 (piiymonl must accompany application) ^ Maximum U ofdoKS to Ijc kept at one time: __\ _ (over 6 months of age) Muxinnim U of cals to be kepi at one lime: ________(over 6 nionihs oi age) Principal Hierd(s):. if ..jl s'kiVX lif -----------------—------------------ Purpose for more than 2 dogs/cals: ------------------------------------—■-'■ — Dogs normally kept; _,)^insidn____ kennel slructuic ('at..‘'oritmlly kept: ___ inside__kennel structure CrOMMICKCI AI. Kennel License Fee: SISO.UU (jmyior.nl must uccompniiy upplication) Nr.mo of Ilusiiiess: _______ ____ llusinesH Aclivilicn; _ ____ (example: boarding, breeding, vcicrinmy care, retail, etc ) Normal Busiticss IIouis: .... Al\ci limns Contact: (mime) ___ (phone)___ l>og luns/cxcrcisp. atclis are:insitle outside both Tire uiuleiiiiguerl hriehy makes application to the ()rono City (.'oiincil lor a Kennel l..iccnsc ,rs siwcificd on tliis form, »lic imdci Nignod ncknowlodgcH that a kcnnol liocuse is permissive only ami tU*cs not j^mnl any aulhoitly to vioi.'O.o any provision ot any ('ily Ordiniurce or rrthcr law or regulation: the undcisigiicd hereby gnurts the City peiimssion to tnspcol the premises prior to license approval ami at any other reasonable time during the license duialion; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the rcquiicmcnts of Municipal Code Chapter 62 Article 111, Division 3; including any special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. / i^ ... ^nlr)^.. U2M4idl ___,__ Z'lx*- Applicnit J Date CityorOnmo 'oT *0'‘ •’/oT o\ V4 i'VJ'" n lO''»"i«y. Ml V/:'{9M)M0 1600 ?/\nKrllry I'aikwiiv Cr)-\lalHiiy.MN.S5??l FOR CITV USE ONI.Y Krimel tni|inicd By;................. Dilc (nspfcied. Rfcommfmh Appfovat l)rnlilQ Owner: OPONO KKNNKI, I JCENSE Al’FLICATION Uficc.livc Januai7 I, 2005 to December 31, 2005 rf-■Ji'dLy r'_____ Puipcily Addicsn;. Dr A:f. (include city mid zip; MailitiK Address (irdirTciciit);___ _______ ______________ PIroite: (huinc) ^____ (work)_^ ____________________________ KESIDKN'riAI. Kamel l.icciiNC Pec: $25.00 (pnymnni must neeninpnny nppliciilion) ^ Mnxiimitn W of dogs to be kept nt one time:__3 __(over 6 motiiiis of nj»,c) Maximum # of cuts to be kept at line time: —(over 6 months of orc ) Prinuipal l)rced(.H): ____________ . I*iir))osn for more tlimi 2 dogs/cals; ____ ____ ___ Hogs notiiiully kept; ^ insitlc ^ kennel structure " j/1 <UfT(.’a(H normally kept:inside kennel stnictuie rOMMKKClAI, Kennel l.leeiisc Fee: $150.00 (pn'y.nent must accompany application) Name oJ Unaincr.3: ___________ » Husincbs Activilica: «eT»< (example: troarding, Irreeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Noniial Uusincss Hours: After Hours Contoct: (name) ____ (phone)... l)oK imus/cxciciHO atcii.s uic: inside ouLsidc both The iitideinignctl hci chy mtikos application to the Orono (!ity C.'ouncil tor a Kennel l.icrnsc ns specified on tliis form; Uic undersigred acknowtcdgcii that a kennel liccnso is permis.sive only mid docs not grunt utiy uuthoiity to violate tiny provision of any (*ily Oidiinince or other law or reguiiitiuii, the iiiideusignctl hereby grants tho (.’ity pel mission to inspect the premises piior to license uppioval utui nl any other reasonuldo time during the licnuso duiation; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the rct|uireincnts of Municipal Code Chapter 62 Ailicle til. Division .1; iiichidiiig iiiiy special conditions impo.scd by the City (Council as part of any kennel ticeiyg;^appro/iil Ap/lit/nf ", Dote royal. 'oT\ni> of Oroiio l»o‘»o%60 ;7>0Krllrv I'aikw^y (fy*fat Hjiv.MN.VP3 (9>1) M9 4/.00 f one/r y t \^\ ‘iiy ii^.jIL \ _ jjiMjo'£1___ Krnnfi Iniprc le«l Hf t)4lr litf,»ril«4l. KmitiiiiiciitU ^ A|i|Mu^4l 1^1^^Denial f J ORONO KFNNEL I JCENSE APPMCATION I-ITcctivc Jaiuiaiy 1,200.S lo December 31,2005 Ownri I’lopcrly Addicss: L t\s,~C..___( 'O RECEIVED DEC 0 9 2004 CITY OF ORONO (include city and zip) Mailing Addicss (if difTcicnl): _____________ IMiunc: (liome)^ / VpV./A\\_____ (wuik)__ KKSIDKNTIAI. Kvnnrl I.icnixe Fee: $25.00 (paynicnl must iicconipHny applicHlion) Maxiiniitii tt of dogs lo be kepi :a one lime: -3>__(over 6 months of oge) Maximum (f of cats lo be kept at one time:________ (over 6 montlis of age) CrOMMKKCIAI, Kriincl l.kcnsr Fee; $150.00 (payment most nccompnny application) Nsmoof ituoincss;____________ liusincss Activities: (cximi|)ic; boiiiding, bleeding, vetciioaiy care, retail, elo.) Noitnnl liusincss Hours: After llouis rontuci; (name) _______ (phone)______ Dog runs/excrcise areas are: inside outside boili 'I he undeiKigned hcieby iiuikeH application lo the (hono City Council for a Kennel I .uTnsc as scicnficd on this foiin, the under nigned acknowledges that a kennel hccn.se is p'^’missive only and does nut pant any authority— • to violate any provision of any (.'ity Ordinance oi other law or rcguiaiion; Ihc undersigned hereby grants Iho {'ily permission to ins|tcct the picmises prior to license approval and at any other rcruionahic litnc ituring the liceii.se dniution; and the undrr.signcd agrees to abide by ihe tc<imtpuicnts of Municipal Code Chapter 62 Arliclo III, Diviston l^including any special conditions innioscd by iho City Council as part of any kennel \ license flmr^qvah Applannr iS\' f !lfy of Of Olio 1*0 llo»6rt 7/no Ktiky Nfk^viy luy. MN S5U.1 (V^7)740 4A00 M)RC Krnn#!l Impeded lly: _ I )ile littpedfd: Keumimnidf.A|i|)iiival (S' ..I?®’! UKONO KKNNEL LICENSE ArPIJCATION Effective JHiiuniy 1, 2005 to ncccniljcr 31,2005 Owner ........ Property Address: S (includo city and zip) ! Miiiling Address (if difTrir;il): ^ Phone: (homo) III fiiurinii;: _ ^umiMEd (w»M nRSIORNTIAL Krniirl IJcnuic Fee: $2S.flO (payment must iiccompany applicmtion) Maximum of c Iors to be kept at one time; Maxiiiuiin of cats to.be kcut at one lime: Piincipal lhec(l(H); j[j3-|y i ___ Pm pose foi moir than 2 dogH/cjils: _ D y/ D orm not niMlIy kept: ..^ inside_____krnnet Ktiuctuie (!nta noiinnlly kept: _ imiidc _ kennel sliuctuic (over 6 months of nRe) (over 6 montlis of age) COMMKKCIAI, Kriinrl Mernse Fee: a$15CMJ0 (payment must accompany application) Name of I luainens: IhiKincss Activities: (example: Imniding, brrrding, veininsiiy cure, ictail, etc.) Nonnal liusincss Hours; _ Alla 1 lours Contact: (name) (phone)____ Dog iniifi/cxctcisr airtis me:insiilo oni.sidc both Tlie nfidersigncd licreby m Jets application to the ()rono c;ny ('oimcil lot n Kennel I .icense as .sj>ralird on Uits Ibrtn; tlie undetriigned ackho.vlcilges that a kennel license is pci missive only and docs not grant any authority to violate any piovisioii o( ary ( ity Otdimincc ot other law or legulalion; the ututcisigned hcicby grants the C?ity pel mission to inspect the pinnisrs piior to lirensr apptoval and ul any ofhri leasonahlc tune during thn license duration; and the unf^^rsigned agitcs to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 62 Aitu leyirr,. DivisiiUi 1; including any s|>caal coiutitums imiTosc d by the (hty (\)unul us pmt of any keiuiel licenyfi ap)ji<j|val. Applicant Date DtC 0 1 2004 :. "V»r"“ CITYOFORONO 7/M) KtUry I'mliwiy ( ‘ty^lil niiy.MN (0.S7) 249 «lfiOO FOH ( Kennel Inipertni iijr Ditr Intpectril; Krumtinnuti:^ A|»jMnviil OS DaiMl LJ OKONO KKNNKI, l.irKNSK AITIJl.’ATION liHcctivc Jatuiaiy 1,2005 lo Drrcinbci .'il, 2005 Owner:Poben Pioiicily Aitilirwi: 0)^ fCY CX^Q\T)no MN (lul-.Uide city aiu> zip) MallliuAclilicss(ildillmiil): PO OCODO Mfl ,;,o„r. (home) 059i.T|5.‘)<]S3' _______ KKNIHKN I'IAI. Kennel l.tccnsc Fee: $25.00 (piiyinciit imiM nccoiiipatiy iip|)Iication) Mnximtiin # ofdoRs lo hr. kept nl one lime: 3 (over 6 monilis ol np.'!) Muxonom ft of ciils lo fir kri»l nl one lime: -—^ (over 6 iiuiiilhH of age) ujiix acioi' Hetrio/er Mixriinripnl Uirnl(ii): Piirpor.c for mure than 2 doHrAnig; f^/^CJJl'OL Dogs normnlly krpt! ^ injiidr krnnrl sliiu tuic ('nfw nminnlly kr|)l: **'****^® _krnnrl slnuiuir rOMMKKnAI* Krnnrl Mmur Keo: SISU.OU (piiyinrnt nm.sl m.roinpany nppliriilion) Nnmr nt Hnrtinrnn; Uusmrnn A* hvilir^it (example: bonnling, Inrrdmg, vrlrnniuy oiir, irlnil, dc ) Noiinnl nnsinrsH Ilium; Altrt lliMm(!on(m.l. (nan:c) (phonf.) Dog luna/cxrrelrie arrnn ;nn:inniilr oiifsiild both *1 hr ninlnnigiiril liridiy makr% iipplu alion to Ihr ()iono ('ity Council lor a Kennel I irnrr ns sivnliril on this foiin, llir uinlriHtgiiril lu knnwInlgrH tlmt a krnnrl lirrnso la p^llni.H^iva only uiul does not gtanl any authoiity to violnir nny pmvision nl nny (*ily C Intmniu r oi otliri hiw oi irgnlnlton, Ihr undrisigiinl hcirhy p.iants the C'lly pfiinisMoii to iiisprct the picmises prior lo license oppin%al mnl nl nny oihn imsonablr lime cluiing ihr liiTiixc ihiiation, and the undrisignrd agiera lo almlc hy Ihr iruuiicmenls ul Muiucii)al Code (liaptcr t)2 AiIh Ir III, I livtNion V; inrhidmg any S|>rrial conditions nn{H>srd hy the Chty (*ouncil an pait of any kennel licemr approval. Date ncensr approval. ^4£u£l^^lljajLiL2 Appluant y w. Li. rily Ilf OniMO r 0 Mo' )/>0 Kfilrv f'tiiLiWtiv Oytliil lUy, MN SU} \ (g53)3i9 -1600 H)l< i Kcmict fnipcUcil Uy /, „ , ----- Ofilf ImpprfrfI; RffominfMih I - jl,0 O*^ y — Dfiitji QAjigfoviil OKONO ki<:nni <:i. mcknsk ai 'I’MC ’ation lillcctivc Januoiy 1,200b to December 31,2005 Ownrr;(i .ry- i/ir Piopnly Aililicu: ^ uyt(T fiA A>^c H po/iO__ Mtiiling Addicss (if diifaciit); I’hoiic: (home)___(work) KKSIDFNTIAIi KriinrI l.lieiHC Vrv: $25.00 (puyinnnl l^ll^l accoiiipiiiiy npphcalion) Maxiimnn tt of dogn to be kepi at one lime:-7 (over 6 moiilhs of age) Maximum # of enti to be kept ol one time; __ T— .. (over 6 numilis of age) I’linoipal Hieed(a); ... / I'oipoKn for nioic Ilian 2 «Iogs/cal»: 7 C __ Doga notmally kepi; inxido _____kennel KtiucUiro (’ata nutmally kept: inside ___kennel structure COMMF.KfiAI. Kniiiel l lr cnae Fee; $150.00 (pnymrnt ninxt accomp.nty appln ation) Nome ol UuslnoQo;» r« • Huaineiui Activities: (example: iMiaiditiM, lircciling, vctcilnuiy cniC, retail, etc.) Nonnal Ihjxinc't ’r Hours: __ Ann noins Contael: (name) ____ (piiono) 1 )og nui.'i/oxcrciso arcus are:inside outside both ( Applioinl Date Tim ondeiNlgnrd Imirliy makes appliration In lire Oiono City (aHiiu'iI foi'it Kcnnell .icriisc as .simoiricd on tlii.s lorin; the undersigned acKmiwIedgra that a kennel license is peimissive oniynnd lines not grant any authonly— • to viotata any inoviaiuti of any ('ily Oidinancc or olhn law ot irgolalion; the uiuiet.signrd liciclty grunts the ('ily primission to inspect the piemisrs pi mi to license apptoval and at any ulhei leaMuialite time during tho license diiialion; and the iiiuleislgned agiees to almtc by llie leqmicmcnts of Municipal ('ode Chapter (>2 Article III, Division 3; including ayy special condilions imposed by the City Council as port of any kennel liconae approval. {mf A" J CHy ofOniiio n o. Don 66 r/M) Kelley Peik^vey Oyitit ney.MN \sm (0)2) 249 4600 FOK I I Kennel Iniiwrlrd Ily: Dete Inipff leil; Kcxommfitils; Mj.-o?' _ A[);m)Vil fa***^***^ l)e«ii«l Cl ORONO KKNNF.I. MCENSE AITMCATION I'flcctive Jumiiiiy I, 2005 to Dccnnbcr 31.2005 Owner; Jijrrv- OqA_ vkoAitciL __fA CXV OJSqV.sK ITopeity Addicss: , ^^KJ. _C>.03UH (inr.liide city iind zip) MnihiiR Address {tl dillcrcnl): I'honr: (home) ''H T:ftSfT____(work)./]5Z : 210_i3Q^b HEitlUEN 1 lAl. Kennel UceiiM* I'ee: $25.00 (|)uyiiicnl must nccoinpitiiy nppliciiliuii) Mhxiiiuiiii H of dogs to lie kept iil one tiiiio:__^_____(over 6 months ot'ngr) Mttxiiiuiin II o( cals to be kept at one tunc: _ , (over 6 montlis of age) I'lincipal Hicrd(«): ^ ^ ) /.iy, » I’uipose lor more tliim 2 doKs/cnIs; .rmr^xwynrtv ,. y>Vujo>alEi _ D ors normally kept: . nrsidc kcimci stiuctiiio Cats nnitnally kept:inside kennel strucluro C.*C)MIVIKKCIAI« KciiiiH IJcnixi* Kre, SISO.OO (jiayiiiriit iiaiM ai.coinpany nppln atioii) Niiinn ol Miisinnns: __ Musiiiens Activities: (cxain|ilc: boaidiiiK, bleeding, vrtriinaiy rare, retail, etc.) Noitnal IbiMiirsH Ilonis; _ Aftr.r lloiiis (!oiilact. (luiinr) (pliniin) ^ D or nms/cxrrcisc areas arc:___insido______outside _ hoili I he undci.'iiRiu'.d linchy iiiakcN iipplu atioii to the Oioiiot 'ily C !oiiiird for a Kriinel I .icense OS specified on tltis litim, llin imdnNiRtind arktiowledRcs that a krnnri iKtrnso is permissive only and docs not giant any uutlioiity to violate any provision ol any (,‘ity (hdmunce oi other law or it Rulalioii, the uiulnsiRiird hnrhy granl.s the (.’tty paniiMSion to inspect the pieinisrs piioi to lii ense approval iiiul at any othn irastaiahic time dunnR the liceiwc thiiation; and the undrixiRiud agirrs to ahutc hy the irijmrcincnls of Municipal t'udc (.liaplrt 62 Aitidn III, Division \, inchiditiR any uprcial conditions liniioscd hy the Dity Doimcil ns pint of any kennel heensp^pprovaf ■ Api/icmit ll-.H-OH Date i f L JtL 3 0 » f. City of Orona KO. Hox 66 2750 Kelley Paiku^ay Ctys\a\ Day, MN 55323 (952) 249.4600 CITY OF ORONO Kennel Inspected By Dale Inspected; Recommends: Appro\ai FOR cm'' 4 By __^ f______ Denial D ORONO KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January 1,2005 to December 31,2005 Owner: J^Avid ^ _____________________________ Property Address: 2Jal^4 (Ia SCO JTO/V' 355*% I (include city and zip)* Mailing Address (if diflerent): ________ Phone: (home) • 8(^' *-j7 (work) *]7 RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Fee: S2S.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum U of dogs to be kept at one time: Maximum # of cats to be kept at one time:_____ Principal Brccd(s): Qoldmn (over 6 months of age) (over 6 months of age) Purpose for more than 2 dogs/cats: Dogs normally kept:/U^^ inside kennel structure Cats normally kept: j—' i.-----1—inside kennel structure COMMERCIAL Kennel License Fee: $150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business: _______________ Business Activities: (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Nonnal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name) (phone) Dog runs/exercise aret at e:inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provmon of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigned hereby grants the City permission to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by tlie requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 62 Ai licle HI, Division 3; including any special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. Applicant -t&e,__<POrxl Date * MinneioUi Dcpiutmciit uf Public Safety Alcohol mihI Gumblliife Eiirorccniciil 444 Cednr Stircl, Suite 133 St. Paul. MN 5.5I0I-5I13 fiM ?.% 697‘3 • n Y 6JSI 282-65.S5 • b*nx 6!SI 297 ViV; KKNEWAL OK LIQUOR, WINE, OR CIAJB LICENSE No licenw will lie apf>riived or leleaiecJ iiniil llie $20 Kclaiirr IIJ Card fee is received by MN [.iqiinf Cniilrol LiccilSSfi: Please verify your license iiifonnollon contained below. Make coircctions if nccc.ssary and siKn. City CIcik/Counly Auditor should submit this sicned lenewol with completed license mid licensee licjuor liability for the new license |>eiioil. City Clerk/County Auditor arc also m|iiircd by M.S. 340A.4(M S. 3 lu report miy Hmise CHPccllalion. _____________________License Period nndin>» (!lly/County where license uppiovcd. ’^ ***^'’ License Code ."•p..-* I Licensee Name TVnde Name Licensed Location address City, State, Zip Code Business Plionc rir.rriifi Hill Oi»l f Plnh T»*r'. ^nrimi Mill Hn | f Di.iS 7pr. r.+ h M llmnn. t.|M LlCENSOEESoff Sale $i vi. m»i On Sale $ |7|»^ Sunday $ \^\7i By si(*nliiK this renewal upplkatluiu U|i|iliniiil i'erlilles that there lia.s Irern mi rhiin{*e in ownership on the siliovr named llceitsee. For elian|»rs In ownership* the licensee named alrovc* or fur new licensees, full appliculioiis should lie used. »Sec back of this application for further infoniintioti iieefled to rompletr this renewal. 1. Licciuscc confiiins it has no interest whutsocvci. dii^lly or indiicclly in any other iMpior rMablishinniIs in Minnesota. II so, give details on back uf this application. 2. I .icciiscc coiifiims that it has never had a li(|uoi license irjecfed by any cify/fownship/rminty in the stale of Minnesota. If ever rejected, plca.se give details on tire hack of this renewal, llicii sign Ixrlow. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five yeais it has not luid a Iii|uor liccn.se icvokcd foi any liquor law violation (.siiiic or local). If a revocation has occnnctl. please give details on Ihc back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Liccn.scc confums that dining the past five yeais it or its employees have not liecn cited for any civil nr criminal liquor law violuliuiis. If viulatiucis have occuiicd, please give details on back of this lencwul, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the pn.st license year, a simuiions has not been issued under llic Liquor ’ Liability I.41W (Drum ,Sbop) MS 340A.802 If yes. attach a copy of tlic summon.s. then sign liclow 6. Licensee cuiifirms that Workers Cumpcusaliun insuiuncc is in elfcct for the full license (>eiiod. Liccii.srt! has uthiclicHl ii liipior Ihilillity iiisiirunct* cei tinrati* that cortYspmids with the license perind In clfy/county wlwn* Uceiisf b issued. $100,000 hi cash ur .u*curUies or $100,000 surely bond may Ire siiiiiiiitted in lieu of licptor llahillfy. . 1 14CCIISCC Signature ^ (Signnim« ccnifies all nlwivc information to be correct and license has been approved by city/counly.) City Clak/Coiint y Auditew Signat uie __ Date (Signntuir ccififies that r.:ncwal of a liquor, wine or club license has been upptovcJ by the city/couniy aa stated alnive.) County Attorney Signature pate C'ounly Bomd issued licenses only (Signatuie ccitifies licensee is eligible for liccn.se). |-olicc/^>hcrifl Signatu re (Sigiuituic ccitifics licensee ui assc^^tes have nut Irccii cited dining tfic |ml five years for any statc/local liquor law vtolntions (crirninal/civil). Report violations on back, then sign here. PS 9093 9H Jlate Dale Indicate below changca of corporate le addrcaws or tdcphonc numbers; Indicate bdow any Intereit whatiocTOr. directhr or Indlrectte In other liquor eatabllghmcnte:•Ilfll Report bdow detfllh of liquor law violationg fdvil or griminnl) that h^vc occurred fines or other penaltiea. incluciinf Liquor Control Peniiltiesl! Report bdow detalh t ly aM¥ llwjiMc irfectiona or CUy/Countv Commentai! ______"TVxaiml/ L^qLvs,>oi\ v^>vy oivoK^ ^ 10/04 Directions APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF ANNUAL INTOXICATING LIQUOR, WINE, 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIQUOR, AND SETUP LICENSES City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone: (952)249-4600 This form must be filled out with typewriter or by printing In ink. If the application is by an Individual person, by such person; If by a corporation, by an officer thereof ; if by a partnership, by one of the partners; if by an association or corporation, by tho manager or managing officer. License type: (check all that apply) I] On Sale Intoxicating Liquor ($5,000.00) □ Wine ($2000.00) Sunday Liquor ($200.00) S Club ($200.00) Setup ($100.00) 3.2% On Sale ($100.00) 3.2% Off Sale ($50.00)HI Off Sale Intoxicating ($150.00) License year _______2005_______(January 1 - December 31) 1. Name of appilcant/licensee (name of individual, partnership, association or corporation): Business Trade Name Business Address "11^ AuwW S u Qn)r\0 (City) Mailing Address (if different) (SSr“ (Ctly) Licensee's Minnesota Tax Identification Number Phone (2p) (W Licensee's Federal Tax Identification Number ^1* 2. If the above named licensee is an individual, complete the following: a. Individual Name (First)(Middle)(Last)Date of Birth HoSiAddfSi (StSii) (cityj j2-j------------------ If the above named licensee is a partnership, association, or corporation, complete the followina for each partner/officen ^ ______________a. Partnw/Pffl Home Address M. MOnM '(SoM«)JkcT (Middle) , Uftf tAtlJ Partr HotneAddfM fop? (Jity) (MM (Last) PartnertOfflgpfName . (First) \ Pf (zw (Last) .is t i i. uI i ilifITTj., (Middle). . iSSi.i (Last)isii I Oats or Birth 3. 4. Complete the following for the manager of the above-named business: ______1Vuw»s___________________a. IndWIdual Name Home Addreu (StfMl)(Zip)Home Phone Have there been any changes in ownership or control of the licensee or enlargement or alteration of ion? (This includes any transfer of Yes. the licensed premises since the date of the last renewal appH^on'i stock or change of officers or directors of a corporation.) _ No; If yes, describe the changes and the date of City Council approval of these changes? S. Has there been a change of manager, operating officer or agent in charge of the licensed premises since the date of the last renewal application^This is defined as the person responsible for day-to- day operating decisions of the premises.) X No; ____Yes. If yes, describe the change and Ihe date of City Council approval of the change? 6. Have there been any other changes to tho Information centred in the original or previous renewal applications which have not been submitted to the City? X No; ____Yes. If yes, describe these changes and/or include floor plan. 7. Are any real estate taxes, personal property taxes, special assess^ments or other financial claims of the City of Orono delinquent or unpaid for tho premises licensed? X No; __Yes. If yes, give dolails. 8. Have you received any summons during the past yoar under M.S. 340.95J?^his is a claim for injury resulting from the sale of liquor filed under your dram shop insurance.) -A No;__Yes. If yes, attach a copy of each summons received. 9. Applicant and his associates In this application will strictly comply with all the laws of the State of Minnesota governing the taxation and the sale of Intoxicating liquor, wine, or 3.2 percent malt liquor or beer and the Orono City Code, and I hereby certify that I have read the foregoing questions and that the answers to said questions are true of my own knowlodge. • 9 1 10.As the person executing this application for this license. I acknowledge that an investigation will be conducted for use in determining my qualifications. I hereby expressly authorize release of any and all Informatiori which any organization, company or person may have, including Information of a confidential or privileged nature. I hereby release the City and any organization, company or person furnishing Information to the City, as expressly authorized above, from any liability for damage which may result from furnishing the Information requested. 10. The information requested on this form will be used by the City of Orono in the issuance of your license or processing of your renewal application. The information that you supply on this form will become public information when received by the City of Orono. Under Minnesota law (M.S. 270.72), the City may be required to provide the business tax identification number and social security number of each applicant to the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue. ANY FALSIFICATION OF ANSWERS TO THE ABOVE QUESTIONS WILL RESULT IN DENIAL OF THE APPLICATION. fklo (Title) (notary stamp) Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of t . 200^. UNOA S. VEE notary pvauc • Ill C0B«lW» W* (Notafy Pubiic/City Clerk) SEE ATTACHMENT FOR ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION. CITY USE: Date Fee Paid: i^LfoS Amount: ^0 ^ Date Council Approved:. Receipt No.: License No.: i m CITY OF ORONO At> aSmy SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT t Date iMued: Date of Rvent: Time: January 24, 2005 May 1.2005 8:00 a.m. - ll;00a.ri. Name of PerMin(*) And/or Organi/ation Sponitoring ihii Kvcnl; l..orctla Docken Wells Fargo Hank Wayzata 900 Ea.st Way/alu Hoiilcvard Wayzata, MN 55391 Phone: 612-3 16-1441 Type of Kvent: Location of Event: Wells Fargo Half Marathon Hegin: Wells Fargo Hank Wayzata. lake Street to ^■c^ulalc Road to County Road 15 to Orono Orchard Road to I’ox Street to Old Crystal Hay Road to County Road 51 to County Rrrad 19 to North view Road to Lake Road to County Road 15 to Old Hcach Road to County Road 19 to Hcchrle Avenue to the SouUiwcsl I.R'I’ I’rail to Water Street. Fiiii.sh; Wells Fargo Uaitk Flxeelsior 1'he following docuinvnU arc required and on Hie at the City Administrative Offices: • ('eiiif'icate of (icncral Liability insurance • Route of Race Hvent • Approval from Orono Police Department The following conditions have been placed on this eveiil: • Police .stairing will be ic(|uiied at the following intersections: - County Road 15 and West i'crndale Road - County Road 15 and Orono Orchard Road “ Orono Orchard Rtrad and I'ox Street - County Road 146 and Fox .Street - Willow Diive at F’ox Street County Road 84 and inix Street — County Road 15 at County Road 51 (Noith Shoie Diive) - (anility Road 84 and (anility Roar! 51 (two s(|uuds/iour oliicers) - (anility Road 51 and County Road 19 ” Lake Road and (^ounty Road 15 (two s(|iiud.s/four on’icers) - County Roatl 15 and County Road 19 “ (bounty Road 19 and Old Heach Road (Some squads trom the tirst part ol tire race will move fioin tlieir positions aRei tire racers pass to as.sist at later crossings.) 27.50 Kelley Parlowiy, P.O. Dox 66. CrysUl Hay, MN 55323 Phone: 952 249-4600/ Fax: 952-249 4616 / www.ci.oioiio.iiui.iM CotUUHomB • Continued A meeting is to be held with the Orono Police Department two weeks before the race to review with the police the stalling that the volunteers will provide and at what locations. The police will confirm what staffing they will contribute. Contact should be made with Sgt. Kurt Erickson at 9S2-249-4731. Citizen helpers for traffic control will need to wear traffic control vests. Wells Fargo must notify St. Martin’s Church and lafayette Club in writing at least TWO months in advance with the date and time of the race. Wells Fargo will notify Minnetonka Beach and all other cities the race goes through at least I’WO month in advance of die race. Wells Fargo must contact lleiuiepin County Department of Transportation to advise of the race and road closures that local police expect to make and request permission to allow for roads to be closed as needed to allow the race to progress, noting the event has been held for twenty years. (Contact; Milch Wiebe, Hennepin County DOT Permit Office, 1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, MN 55340,763-745-7601 ) Wells Fargo should conUwrt North Memorial Ambulance to advise of the event and ask if they can schedule extra people for that morning. (Contact: Mike Oliverius at North Memorial, 763-520-5789) Race staff shall remove all race-related garbage and debris, including signs, after completion of the race. By acceptance of this special event permit, the permit holder, on behalf of any and all organizations and private persons, is granted authority to operate under the special event permit, and agrees to indemnify md hold harmless the City of Orono from all claims arising from said event. The permit holder, all organizations and private persons exercising authority under this permit, do waive and release all claims against the City of Orono, its officers or employees for any damage to person or property arising from the exercise of privileges granted by this permit and agrees to hold harmless the City of Orono, its enqrloyees and officers from any such claim. llte Orono Police Department and its officers are empowered to revoke this special event permit at any time for any safety concerns that are not immediately resolved by the permit holder or a representative of the permit bolder, lliis revocation shall cause the immediate cancellation of the event originally authorized by this permit. Approved at City Council meeting on: January 24,2005 (City Seal) Ronald J. Moorse, City Administrator 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66, Qystal Bay, MN 55323 PhOMr 952-249-4600/Fax: 952-249-4616/www.ci.orono.mn.u8 ^ • 1. 2. 3. 4. APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES /y\ (Ordinance No. 164, Second Series - Adopted 12/06/97) m Make check payable to: City of Orono Mailing address:P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FEE: $100.00 (February 1-January 31)h 10-OS' DATE Applicant's Full Name _____firo.A'V______1 FIRST MIDDLE LAST Applicant's Home Address ____^/O a). SKftfc (Sr • ‘_____ HOUSE NUMBER STREET HOME PHONE CITY STATE Applicant's Business Go/Z Coatic. i)F BUSINESS >3V^9 TYPE OF Bl /vCiKe(/itto GoIL rf, 0ro>'O^ ^Cnc. BUSINESS NAME *TI O a). Skoft, Dr • W • rv\(iu^ij mrJ _____ MAILING ^DRESS BUSINESS PHONE HoS t\)\ Pfm • STREET ADDRESS Oron'i ^ CITY Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the customer and the licensee or employee takes pi ace. Oushmer ajfCj -Jo 4i)feacco J>ru«iiu4'• Cuiiont/* _ iQir-^. jiyA, Sr. IKcX-|9 U)‘H Cijlc. Xb 0(/^ vcixicto pixctiic^^ 'Fki^ i* ^ irctirttC olratJ*'V Vfio \ ■/r^fow\ Sfra rt^L __ \ ^ ■> <■ i HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO. TOBACCO >? J PRODUCTS, OR TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT j V • •• Tn TLJC I A lA/o r\c ’rue ota rc r\e kJikiKieor\rA Akir\ "^ue r\Dr\ikiAki/^ec* rue r^ir\/ • V. i ♦ 1. 2. APPLICATION FOR LI c}i~ i\rji lY ISELL TOBACCO PR >'■’ , L ,n V‘2i: H' l. ITOBACCO RELATED (Ordinaries No. 164, Second Seriat Make check payable to: City of Orono I /<>/ Malting address: FEE: $100.00 (February 1 -January 31) Applicant’s Full Name J.mcs DUf^ine FIRST Applicant’s Home Address 20 Clay Cliffo Drivo HOUSE NUMBER M'OOLE P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 _JanuarY_13, 2005 OAfE LAST ciTY STREET Minnosota__ STATE 952-470-9951 HOME PHONE 55331 ^IP 3. Applicant’s Business Par/Restaurant_ TYPE OF BUSINESS 952-471-3352 Narrows Salcxm BUSINESS NAME Sane BUSINESS PHONE 3380 Shoreline Drive MAILINO ADDRESS STREET ADDRESS Orono, Minnesota clfY ■ ~ 55392 Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the customer and the licensee or employee takes place. Cigarettes arc kept bchiixl b.ir. Patrons must purchase fion either Uirtondar or waitress ~~ I HtKtBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO. TOBACCO PRODUCTS, OR TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT TO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF/ORONO. Slgnalura Dale imiOn& d § Kcmm under INa ordkiance ahek be conakhned a prMhge and not an abeoMa dgMofthb ^f^lcant and ahan not entitle the bolder to an mjdomatkiwmwal of the Ucenaa, t m la 1. 2. APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICI^“'^'’ (Ordlnanct No. 164, Second S«rlts-Adopt«M2n«^^ q ^ Make check payable to: CityofOrono CITYOFORONO Mailing address: FEE; $100.00 (February 1-January 31) Applicant's Full Name FIRST T P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 MIDDLE Applicant's Home Address o« f2ci HOUSE NUMBER STREET HOME PHONE jr^ifciLf nJ IS CITY ^ wMaJ STATE 3. Applicant's Business __^THTf O A/ TYre OF BUSINESS BUSINESS NAME ^^^^DRESS ___CxT°!D 9^^ BUSINESS PHONE A/ti. STREET ADDRESS CITY Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or customer and the licensee or employee takes / HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO. TOBACCO PRODUCTS, OR TOBAP^ RELA TED DEVICES A T THE ABOVE LOCA TION SUBJECT MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITYOF 0RON(* ^ ) Date ^ 4 \ Th9l$mmc§ai9gcmmund9rihl9ordk}anc9shaKbecon9kimBdapri^4hg9mfnoimtab9oh^rfaMofffie^^ 9nd 8hM not snffUo tho tfOk^ to on wHonwHc fono¥ifal of iho Uconao. 1. 2. 4. (P APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordinanct No. 164, Sacond Sortot • Adopted 12/08/97) Make check payable to: City of Orono q ^ Mailing address: P.O. Box 66 Op ^004 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 0/VO FEE: $100.00 (February 1-January 31) Applicant's Full Name DATE ^ \ V HRST ~ ■ MIDDLE Applicant's Home Address C-^r\ LAST’ Appiicmt 8 Home Address . HOUSK NUMBER v blKttl V\vo CITY X ^ STATE ^ STREET HOME PHONE ZIP 3. i^plicant's Businessmess ^ T i-L. wr DVidiixcoo - ^^ DuoimcDa rnuiMC ^ BUSINESS NAME STREET ADDRESS . VCl__________ VsV CITY V ZIPMAIl INQ ADORF-SS Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobac ............................................ place. tobacc o related di ■<>^X33eYisSL^ I HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO. TOBACCO PRODUCTS. OR TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCAL ION SUBJECT TO THE MWS OF THE STATE OF. MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OPORdNO: Stgnakira \^-l ■^o oH DbIb~i V 1 he laatmHXolatcmm under this onUnancm that be contkitnd a ptMhgm and not an ^iokjfit light (i/maafipitrah f ’ and ahaK not entitle the holder to an automatic renewal of the Ikenae. 2. 3. APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AN TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES , 4 (Ofdln^inc# No. 164, Socond 8#rkii - Adopted 12A>8/97) Make check payable to: City of Orono Mailing address:P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 o\“^/ FEE: $100.00 (February 1-January 31) DATE .1iluh 1. Applicant's Full Name Thtf/J IIHST MIPDIF. ^ 'Sm.i LAST Applicant's Home Address HOUSE NUMHKH Mnc6'^(/c CITY CTREET HOME PHONE 2^. SIATi: JT:r.JLL _ Applicant's Business Qjf ni i/L-/o hu /Oc . iT S\ <7^ l'" TYPE 01 BUSINESS......... 11 nojjM IS NAME Vrp.- rC HUSINKSS PHONE fiOjj oOX.BUSINESS NAME MAIL INO ADDRESS.......... StiAh'^UftO p_dp STTTEET ADDRESS - ........................5ii 3fZ- CITY Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the customer and the licensee or employee takes place. (\a^H u 'R /yiwr HA/Jo __LLLAA__~ e _______7 fo H________________________________ I HCRHUY MAKF. APPLICATION FOP LICLNSE TO SELL TOBACCO. TOBACCO PRODUCTS, OR TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT TO THE MIfVS OF Tl IE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ORONO. Date f/ty Ifm inmirnym of a It^nm t/ndpr thl$ ortlfnmm ^nlt b$ Ginikfemd a ptMhgo at}dnoi an abaoluh Hifht ofiha and ahaff noi anfHia tha hokhr to an aufomaUc mnaami of lha Uoanaa. n ir^Ti^rinTTViv^ iii^rfirriiniTfiirifh ri ■ ^ 11 nibiiri MwmiBUt HjinmiiM r 5IIWHO APPLtCATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordiruinco No. 164, Sacond Sarlos • Adoplad 12/08/07) c® Make chock payable to: City of Orono \o ‘) \ 'V Mailing address:P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FEE: $100.00 (Fobninry l-J/jnuury 31) 1. Applicant's Full Name .. ........... /?11 f"-///) 11 fiioi Minnie: 2. Applicant's Home Address —jJihI< OAIC 0 ,Sm/ IASI Mouse : Nl IMI It H SI Ml I r _ '/U S f* - s vn UOMLI'IIONE /H/IPu' 6'a‘ov'l'" OIIY A/ji/ OfATU 5 5* .31 I Zll* Applicant's Business A/l/l AiiC/0C\j^ ^ 7YPI . OF BU31NI OS ^'tV((e« u v/,v V /{eL \(y/\x HUSINI SSNAMl MAii iNOAnnierss .C’ ilUSINI SSI'UONI: fy !>U0 SVt»/<fC. t e iv^ t"' J)r t c»t' siMi-e I AunRi'ss /\/6 5 Vin'I- CIIY ' /ll» Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the customer and the licensee or employee takes place._____LIAI*<• \v'Rv H/Mfbi Ci<*;'i'r»n«,g r io/a a'i^> ____ JliZ.....•/1 y _ / ill Rim MAM APPUCATION FOR ilClNSp lO Sill lOLiACCO, TOBACCO PRODUC1S. OR TOBACCORPLATLODlrVICt SAI IHLAliOVCLOCATIONSUBJtCT 10 WLLAWSOrTlir-.SIAlPOF MINNI SOTAANn TUP: ORniNANCI SOF THFCIIY or ORONO Cilgnnhrrn /k Dutii or Mm /amMWN V < 1/« Ai wim iHKtat lhi» iwiAianc* than ha conOifafad a piMlena and not an adau/utt m^kant and that nol antida lha hohJar lu an autnmaik lanawal nt dta Ucmnaa. It* Mriwoaaf ttWEiWig ivn-.c^aT.:ur»::a ’...-aggtrA a a>>;ia5vWusvT.Ki »«o » ^CEIVS d APPLICATION FOR LICENSE »2 ms SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS "an6'^°'^° TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ofdliiiinca No. 164, Socoiid Sorlnt - Adoptad 12/06/97) Make chock payable to: City of Orono ' Mailing address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 1. FEE: $100.00 (February 1-January 31) Applicant's Fuli Name _Von HMsr Piml MinOLL 2. Applicant's Home Address -^425 CuunLy Kaiul l^iU____ HOUaU NUMlil H niKFiI j;iiaoka CITY MM »IAII! 55318. /IP .Innunry 7, 2005 i)Air. Martin LA!U 952-/|/ia-5‘7‘Ki___ HOMI- I’HONI 3. Applicant's Business Krtdll Crot't’iy IVIM: (H (UnilNIrSii Uiukxi Hurkct UUUINLOS NAMt ou:jiNir.r.i*iioNJ- . 3311 aiitii I'.riMl! Drlvn _ tiiMi I I ADDin sn Nnviirn* CIIY 55192 211* 3‘M:i Went 50tli Strcut Sullo H-102 MAJUNOAnoREns Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device botwoon the customer and the licensee or employee takes place. A want li>(^ to purclwmu tohiuTu ^>rjj«liu'l n imiHt miiioHt tlio i>r*>— tluft from an fiiiployt«n. tIiw fitn>Utycc tluMi K«to prmlm^T~Toi t lu* cuHtirnior LU- pUfLlm.-m..____ / ni miiY MAKt- AirucArioN roR ucensh to sru iouacco touacco / ‘liODUaiS, OH IOHACCO HI IA IN) 01 VICTS A T TIIL ABOW. I OCA TION HUBJ£CT lO mriAWSOT IHL aiAlt-OhMINNTSOIAANn TUT OHOINANCLSOf TffTCITY Of OHONO. Jamiary 7| yPOj DataGiyiiiiiuio Voii !’• Martin •Saillor Vico ProNldont, (*AO TTw (TkMionLO ut« iM wHhf IhiM iWiMfmth • lUm/l tm ciWMtJ&imt • prf\4hg9 mx! not an abaoMa of ttm OppSQm^t 9htU! not anm (ba ho/iiaf to an autonrnm ranawai of tha Hcanaa, t avniiw.. i.r«.v?'r7’r.u«v 2a ir«;tiL4 w, < i c.tw 1. 2. 3. 4. APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Otdinanc* No. 1«4. Sacutid Sarlo* • Adoplail 12/0«m7) Make chock payable to: City of Orono uV Mailing address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FEE: $100.00 (Pobiuuiy 1-January 31)17 H OAII: A^llcant's Full Name I Iaoimaa iiu.sr MIOULn “ Oalviviv- iA;;t Applicant's Homo Address IKHI.M NUMIII l<OTRCI r aiv lilAII n^stl /II • HOMCI'HONI Applicant's Business piidAlr 0#||- >'1*15 oi mmiNi :i;i ' . HilJ 6*U Jac/‘ ifllNI ;i!INAM foui^lv (fUb i in UU’JINLSHPHONI: mi niMH I AODMi ;::i MAII INn AIMlId .Mi O^vnb Cl IV irV/H /If* Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the customer and the Iconsoe or employee takes place. hysaP >v» |ty w«lK JIm. ^At ama, nOtvihM ^IkL . I HUH HY MAKf ArmCAIION fOH UCHNSI TO SUI JOnACCO, lOHACCO f'nonUCHi, OH IOHACCi>Ht lAIhl'tHtVICLSAI I HtAtiOVn OCA I ION SUHJr.CV Hf: rOAH. Of MINNI SOIAANI) ffft OHDINANCt SOf- IHl. CIIY lUyiitiliitfi ^Dot!! I/H. ,^0 IH-nnm miff tN$ orJmiCi ifiatN> 0 mnimtf 0,, 0h0,*,H> rtuMitw i^pttmn 0iHf 0h0K iHtI mtttah th0 tH>ht0i At m M/ftvrianit nin#Wi/C>7(D« AcnVo. <<0: ^.!!XW>3: rvli:riiK/t.V^axf:rMXnr4 KTi «t l n 4. -«!S •% '■% APPLICATION FOR SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS /CN{g TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ofdlimnco No. 164, SocuiuJ Sorlot • Adoplud 12/08/97) 3 ^ li' Make chock payable to: City of Orono ^ I Mailing nddross:P.O. Box CC Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FEE: $100.00 (Koliruary 1-Jnnunry 31) OAII 1. Applicant's Full Name \ lutll fh MIUULK _____ IASI 2. Applicant's Homo Addross MOUNL NUMUrU CjrRLLI M()MI IMIONI t:i!Y QTAId ?ll» Applicrint's Biislnoss TYPConui.siNnia AMY>#H4 mi!UNI imNAMI 9xa nuoiNdsumoNir*' ......... " lilKI I I AlUmt.MS (Pd', /!/ MAH INUADDMI M!l U fit y *rf fA /hj C.IIV ;:h' Doscribn how tho actual physical oxchango of tho tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco rolatod duvicn butwoun tho customor and tho liconsoe or employoo takes placo.___^ __tkj. —......................................... / HI HHiY MAKI AIVLUyUlON I'CR HCllNi^f' 10 Sl lL 10lh\CCO, TOllACCO riionm:i:i, ok ioiiaccoki u\udduvicl-sai ihi-ahovi locaiion suiotcr lO II It IAWS Of- 11IL S TAW Of- MINNLSOIA ANU 11 It: OHUINANCES Of- IHU Cl IY Of imONO. Dll to Th9 iMUiUHJi a/o undot thfi arilfi4hti:o du^ bo cxnidJoiod o t}iMo]fo ond trof on oboiJuto tigM of ffw ofipScanl otHi ohoH !hM onttbo Itm htOiku to ait muhxnmtic mtowai o/ tfto Hconm <AiiBl4Kir'lti3i*iS)N?^:?7sa Rri!rv rrt niuiSd r»vM«i n«v mNx5121 • 1. 2. 3. 4. APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICESm(Ordinaries No. 164. Sneond Sorios • Adoptsd 1»ii)ft/97) Make cheek payable to; City of Orono Mailing address:P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FEE: $100.00 (FehruMfy 1-JtinUary 31) DATE c I r Applicant's Full Name ________/’I _ MIDDIE LASr Applicant's Home Address . Shy y •{ jtL h|pusc NUMQEU nrRiiLT ^)y jkiJL:^yyy£L HOME PHONE /'hvL. MAIL ZIP ^piicant's Business -----------YPi A* mir.iNEss gr\^. nUSINrsS NAMF ^ mv ciM &A MAJLlNOAOUHL^a (J^ ^ 7^'2.- 7y>\z. ____ UUrilNrSS PHONE yy d* L* _____ SI^LLI AODHESS 4:iiY n /' ZIP Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related devii^o between the customer and the licensee or employee takes place, c ______________________ I Hn<LHY MAKE APPIICATION FOP LICHNSE TO SELL TOnACCO, TOBACCO PRODUCTS, OR TOBACCORFIAIEDDEVICBSAT THF. ABOVE I OCATION SUBJECT TO THE LAVYS OF THF STA TC OF MINNFSO TA AND THE ORDINANCES OF Tl IE CITY or ORONQT A hlgnantfif y7/^xrl.x^L- DahT Uw Innimncm of a tlconum uniht ttUn onUnm^cn Bhotl Ps conaiilofmi a prfvffsga ami not mi nhnoiutn right of thn opf>ttCi»nt mid itmB not mW§ ttm hotdm to mi mitomauc fi/Kiira/ of (f»# ficf/us. ------------^IPH r »» CITY OF ORONO check register 11 0I/1W0S t2 33 PM Pofle I Choch Pay Number PmployM Name Period 003«91 MOOHSi:. RONALD J. 2 0()3n02 !ill.U.S. IIAMIIARA O. 2 003003 Vtr. LINDA 5. 2 003UU4 KUi HN, riK)MAS M 2 003005 OLSON, RONAt D J 2 003000 PETflT, SANDRA K 2 003007 ANDLROON, RRUCL L. 2 003000 IWm/ll N, SIILA 2 003000 liOHIS. JiCOirW. 2 004000 VOID 2 004001 HUDIU, SIACIEM. 2 004002 r.ORNICK, JAMES L. 2 004003 DAY. MISAN J 2 004004 DLMnOUSKI, JAY C 2 004000 MSCMI R, CHRISIOPMLHK 2 004000 OOOO, StmiANY R 2 (KM007 MCNICHOLS, DAVID L. 2 004000 RDSiii m. KYLL M 2 004000 SCIWJI NMOIL. JOMND 2 004010 SILNSMDD. CIIADR 2 004011 lorWL. KIMIM RLYD 2 004012 lOMUII CK. lAWRI NC:l I-. 2 004013 lOMC/YK.MAHKW 2 Chech Chech Amount Dale Chock Slnliie $2.320 40 1/1IV2005 Oiilnlnnillna $544 00 1/19/2005 Outslandino $1,110 33 1/10/2005 Oulslanrflng $1,400 00 1/10/2005 OutMundlnfl $1,231.03 1/1(1/2005 Oiitatamllng $1,005 80 1/10^005 Outslandino $1,045 32 1/1072005 Oiilntnndlno $030 00 1/10/2005 Oulsiandinn $20 (X) 1/10T2005 Outslandino $0 00 1/10/2005 Void V 213 /2 1/1072005 Outslandino $1,/(NI40 1/10/2005 OiilsIaiMlIno $1,120 00 1/1072005 Outslandino $1.0:i0 50 1/1072005 Oulsiandino $ 1.041 60 1/10/2005 Oulsiandino $2,020 12 1/1072(M)S Oulstandmg $1,100 00 1/10/2005 Uulslundlim $1,3/3 50 1/10/2005 Oulsianding $1,75000 1/10/2005 Oulsiandino $1,231 no 1/10/2005 Outslandino $1,210 35 1/1072005 UulslaiMlIiifi $000 00 1/10/2005 (lulslundlno $I,4A0 00 1/10/2003 Uiilslandlnu (XMOM WlllfL, ANIMONYJ 2 $1.704 41 1/10/2005 OutstufKiing 004015 W1I TKI .ANIMUNYA 2 $1.AtU3t 1/1U72005 OiitiitiirMlIng 004010 KIIH/C/, DAV1DA.2 $.10 3 74 1/19/2005 OuUlandlfjg 004017 I’llAMO, CliniGTOPIILRM.2 $mm (lo 1/19/2(K)fi Oulstnmllny 004010 VOID 2 $0 00 1/19/2005 VokJ 004010 CUR IIS. MEUVNIE 2 $1,107115 1/r.l/2(K)5 OtilfilnmDng (M)4070 OAI I RON. MICIIAI I P 2 $175 00 1/10/2005 Oulalufuitiig 004021 (VM’PA. ORf OORY A 2 $1./(I4 10 1/19/2(K)5 Oiilfilnridlng (N)4022 OIINDIAr.il. ,1/VNICi J 2 $1.307 47 1/19/2005 Outftliimliiui 004023 OMAN. l YII 1 2 $1,40(1 (X)1/t!)/2(M)5 OtilMandlng (NM024 1)1 DAI RL. IMINAIDl 2 $1,075 0/1/19/2(H)5 OutsliifHflng 004025 IIANSIN, Ml VI N 2 $//M)0 1/19/2005 OuttUindIng 0040/0 OI1I RAIONI R. scon 0.2 $1,37/07 1/19/2005 OiilMnmlliig 00402/OllMII N. RANDY 1.2 $550 00 1/19/2005 Oulttlttiidlng 004025 PAI MI R, ORI OORYA 2 $4IM) (N)1/1li/2(X)5 OtiUlarvINiy (K)402U RAIIillDN, lUMIRY J 2 $7(M)00 1/19/2005 OuUtundiMg (M)40:i0 DOI II RMAN, MA1IIILWA.2 $501)04 1/19/2(X)5 Otilfiliinding OM/ll/IKIIMII . RACIII 1 M 2 $1,009 /»1/19/2005 Outalanding 054/98 II SKINI N. DI NISt M 2 $930 no 1/19/21H)5 OutfitiirMling 054 /UU IIOD/II N. Sill A 2 $03 7/1/19/2005 OulsklaiHlmg 054500 DORIS, SCOT 1 W 2 $1.!iO0 .14 1/19/2(N)5 OifUtanding 054501 1 HICKSON, KDRI R 2 $1,073 30 1/19/2(X)5 OuUlMiMlIiig 054802 lARNlOK, (.ORRI Yl 2 $7,110 /3 1/19/200S (lutataiHlIng 054501 I ISCIII NICII, DAN 1 2 $1.00/ 03 1/1*.</2(K)5 Oiilnlandliig 054004 MAD.SON, ADRII NM M 2 $/33 /«1/19/2005 OiitnUridlfig 054500 MCNK'.IKMS, DAVID 1 2 $/3l 03 1/1UT2005 Outstanding 054B00 MOROWC/YNSKI. .IAMI.S 2 $1,903 05 1/1Ur2005 OulBtandifHI 0!.-150/It RSI I L.WIILIAM R 2 $390 09 1/19/2005 OiilBtanding 054505 lOMCIII CK, lAWRI NCI 1 2 $54/ 50 1/19CIOOS Oulstandinu 054500 OAI1 RON. MICHALL P 2 $1,440 0/1/t977(K)» Outstanding 054510 Ml YIR.WIILIAMC 2 $030 89 t/tO/7005 OulsIaiMlkig 054811 OMAN. LYI r V.2 $.350 00 1/1977(105 (HitsInndM g 054512 VANO, IIRUCI 1 2 $1,304 00 l/ID/TOUS Oulsiandhig 054813 ORLOORY, JAMLS D.2 $977.02 1/1077000 Outstanding 054514 IIANSI N. DILVLN n«$400 03 1/18^005 Outstanding 054816 OORILN, RANDY L.2 $4/0 to i/in77gu» Outstanding JAN ^ 4 2005 OIY Of UHONU L CITY OF ORONO check regieter 01/1B/0S12 33PM Pbq(b2 ChMli NumlMr EmpktyM Nmm Pay PaHod ClMCk Amount Check Dale Check Statue 054816 PALMER, GREGORY A.2 $1,00442 1/10/2005 Outstanding 054817 RATHBUN, BARRY J.2 11,163.74 1/10/2005 Outstandlno 054818 SKREEN, DALE S.2 $1,132.10 1/10/2005 Outstanding 054610 STEFFENHAGEN, RONALD 2 $1,400.13 $67,407.08 1/10/2005 Outstanding r CITY OF ORONO check register 01/21/05 7:04 AM P«S0l ChMA Pay CKech Check NumtMf Employee Name Period Amount Data Chocli Statue 054821 BOLTERMAN, MATTHEW A.22 11.709.72 1/21/2005 Outetanding 054620 BOLTERMAN, MATTHEW A.2.1 $372.94 $2,062.66 1/20/2005 Outstanding CITY OF ORONO 'Check Detail Register© 01/21/051:34 PM Paga 1 JANUARY 200S Checli Amt Involca Comnwnt 10100 PrtwtyCaah PaM Chki 1/10/2006 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES 0 10121701 Federal WNhholdIng O 101-21703 FICA Tax WHhholdlno 0101 21703 FICA Tax WmiboMIng Total FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES $9,754.77 $4,740.03 $4,745 93 $10,246.03 Paid iU# 08dd43 1/10/2005 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 467 0 101-21705 Olhar ReHcemenl $051.62 Total ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST • 467 $951.62 Pakl ChM 06^44 1/11V2006 LAW EfiFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE 0101-21707 Union Duet $561.20 Total LAW/ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE $561.20 PaklChk* 080045 1/10/2009 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 0 101-21702 Stale Wllhholdlng $4,204 00 Total MN DEPT OF REVENUE $4,204 09 PaWChhf 080046 1/10/2005 MN STAtE RETIREMENt SYSTEM 0 101-21718 Pott EmploynienI HeaRh $304.51 Total MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM SSOa.sf PaMChkf 080047 1/10/2005 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 0 101 21705 Ollwr Retirement $2,022.00 0 101-21709 Other Nnlliement $0 00 Total NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION $2.022 00 PaMChW 080048 1/10/2006 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEPCUSf 0 101-21705 (Jther Retirement $3,332 68 Total ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST $3,332 68 PaWChM 080040 1/10/2005 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETTRFMFNT 0 10121704 PLKA $7.40887 0 101-21704 PERA $5722 77 Total PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT $13.13164 Paid ^hk«iT.TriTxfi 1/10/2006 UNITED WAY 0 101-21708 UnilmlWay Total UNITED WAY $88 00 $86.00 10100 Primary Caeh $43.80133 Piind Summury 101 GENERAL LUND tOt(M) PnmaryCath $43,861 33 $43,001 33 FEDERAL W/H PICAS MEDICARE W/H FICA S MEDCR CITY SHARE DEFERRED COMP 302030 UNION DUES MOSntOO STATE TAX W/H post reliremonl USCM. ENTITY 2339 ODRA #2343 1. MN STATE RETIREMFNT i PCRACUY StiAHE PCRA CMPLOYEEW/H CHARITY DONATIONS CITY OF ORONO Check Detail Register® 01/21/05 7.33 AM Pago 1 JANUARY 2005 Chack Amt Invoica Commant lOIOOPrtmaiy Caah l>aidChfc#^ mat EMK oyees retirement 0101-21704 PERA $20 05 G 101-21704 PERA <10 Total PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT $39 69 PERA CITY SHARE PERA EMPLOYEE W/H 10100 PrImwYCaah $39.60 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 10100 PfimaiyCaah $39 69 $39.69 ■ CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 01/21/051:32 PM Page 1 JANUARY 2005 Checic Amt Invoice Comment 10100PfjfjjryC«h^^^ Pah^Chk# 0800S2 1/24^2065 OEWC •TTTiT*RATION 0 425-20600 Conirects Payable Total DEW CORPORATION $21,161.00 RFPiOF RFPfdF Navarra Fire $21,181.00 Paw CSW^)80053 1/24/2005 ACCLAIM BENEFITS G101-20200 Accounts Payable 0101-20200 Accounts Payable Total ACCLAIM BENEFITS $71.00 347679 $100.00 347680 COBRA Administration 12/04 FSAAdm 12/2004 $171.00 f^aW Chk* oA6A^ 1/24^A6^ accurint 0101-20200 Accotinis Payable $30.00 129729120041 December 2004 f^aldChldl Total ACCURINT $30.00 10055 ^/24/200S ADVANCED IMAOINO SOLUTIONS E 101-41900-413 Office Equipment Rental $566.95 32806994 Copier Lease 1/15-2/15/05 Total ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS $588.95 Paid Chki 060056 1/24/2005 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TEST, INC 0651-20200 Accounts PayaMe $107.50 28818 Total AMERICAN ENGINEERING TEST. INC $107.50 Conoete Test-Birch Ln St Swr Paid Chkf 1^4/2005 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SERVICES E 101-42110-201 Office supplies $169.95 6013-443788 Coffee-PD E 101-41900-201 Office supplies Total ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SERVICES $59 95 613-443789 Coffee-CH $229.90 Paid C^ 080058 1/24/2005 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO. 0 602-20200 Accounts Payabie G 601-20200 Accounts Payabie 1345.20 16168 $345-20 16168 SCADA Maintenance SCADA Maintenance Total AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO.$690.40 Paii^^ihkl 080059 1/240005 BETTER ROADS E 101-43000-433 Memberships & Subscriptions Total BETTER ROADS $24 00 36142 2005 Subscription $24.00 PaidChIc# 080060 G 101-20200 G 101-20200 O 101-20200 G 613-20200 G 101-20200 1/24/2005 BFI Of MINNESOTA. INC Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Total BR OF MINNESOTA, INC $90.39 $75.49 $285 68 $32.49 $56.^ $540 23 1307115 1307214 1307420 1307461 1347632 Solid Waste - Bedeiwood SoNd Waste - Summit Beadi Solid Waste - CH Solid Waste - GC Solid Waste - Nav Fire Paid Chk« 080061 G 101-20200 1/24/2005 BIFFS INC. Accounts Payable Total BIFFS INC. $62.41 $6^41 W244512 Portable - Bedeneood Paid Chk« 080062 1/24/2005 BOLTERMAN. MATT G 101-20200 Accounts Payable E 101-42400-331 Travel Expenses Total BOLTERMAN. MATT $25.50 $37.67 1/13/05 11305 Mileage - Inspectlona Mileage • Inspections $63 17 Paid ChkS 060063 1/24/2005 BONESTROO ROSENE S AS80C. O 101-20200 Accounts Payabie $129.00 0 101-20200 Accounts PayM>M $333.16 O 602-20200 Accounts Payable $396.00 11450QA 115043 115043 1145 6th Ave Piet 05-3056 Wildman Plat 03-2961 MCES loan 18 Ceil CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® JANUARY 2005 Check Amt Invoice Comment O101-20200 O 101-20200 O 101-20200 G 101-20200 O 101-20200 Q 101-20200 O 101-20200 G 101-20200 G 101-20200 G 101-20200 G 101-20200 G 402-20200 G 406 20200 O 406-20200 Q 402-20200 G 402-20200 G 651-20200 G 602-20200 G 602-20200 Total Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts P yable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable $99 00 $99 00 $113.10 $116.00 $129.00 $100.00 $429 00 $129.00 $129.00 $930.47 $129.00 $918.92 $582 50 $9,798.53 $695 50 $8.288 00 $3.638 35 $1,987 98 •1,134.00 115043 115043 115043 115043 115043 115043 115043 115043 115043 115043 115043 115045 115046 115047 115048 115049 115050 115051 115052 1489 Shoreline De Plat 04-2953 1145 6th Ave plat 05-3086 DIroct Project Exp Nov Stonebay 02-2789 1220 Tonkawa Rd Plat 04-3060 Council Mtgs Nov 2004 Morrfes Auro Plat 04-3063 2665 Maplerldge Ln Plat 043069 1354 Rest Pr Circle plat 07-30 4475 Forest Lake Landing 04-30 Maxwell Bay Estates Plat 03-29 Lee Carlson C3ailfield Tr Femdale Rd Bridge Replace 11/ Femdale Rd Bridge Plans/Specs Fox St Bridge Replace 11/04 Fox St Bridge Ptans/Specs BIrcha Lane Storm Sm Garden Lane San Swr Ext Hwy 12 San Swr Rehab I/I BONESTRCX) ROSENE & ASSOC. $30,304 51 Paid Chkf 080064 1/24/2005 BOYER FORD S TRUCK E 101-43000 222 Vehicie Equipment & Parts Total BOYER FORD STRUCK $146 92 34057R $14692 Pulley Assemble #426 Paid Chki 080065 1^^005 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 0101-20200 Accounts Payable $906.66 14267 Total BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. $906.66 3/4 Minus Rock Paid Chk# 080066 f/24/2005 BUDGET PRINTING E 101-42110-201 Office supplies E 101-42110201 Omcesupplles E 101-42110-201 Offlco supplies Total BUDGET PRINTING $20 77 $3228 $49^3 $102 28 2075 2247 2433 Stamp ID Tags 3 part Forms #atdChki 06006/1^4/2005 CECE‘8 SIGNS G 602-20200 Accounts Payable Total CECrS SIGNS $29 82 2028 Sower Decal $29 82 ^aUchki 080068 1^4/2005 CITYVIEWPLUMBINGS HEATING O 601 -20200 Accounts Payable _ _$116 00_ 25745 Total CITYVIEW PLUMBING a HEATING Heater Maint - Nav Water $11600 01/21/091:32 PM Page 2 Paid Chk# 080069 f/24/2005 COLLISION CORNER O 101 20200 Accounts Payable ToUl COLLISION CORNER $6.41615 $6,416.15 6886-2 Repairs - Squad 198 Paid Chk# 080070 1^4/2005 CORNERHOUSE E 101 42110-319 Other Professional Services Total CORNERHOUSE $1.282 86 $1.282 86 2005 2005 Interview Services Paid Chk# 080071 1/24/2005 COUNTRY CAKE CUPBOARD G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $24 00 Pies • Council Work Session Total COUNTRY CAKE CUPBOARD $24.00 COVERALL 6f THE TWIN CITIES----------------- L IOt.41000-404 Hnpalta/Mjiinl-HIdgt/OrQumit $1,574.40 02294 Janitorial-1/2005 CITY OF ORONO Check Detail Register® 01/21/05 1:32 PM Page 3 JANUARY 2008 Check Amt E 101-42110-404 Repalra/Malnl-Bldgs/Grounds Total COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES Immlco Comment $1.070 00 92294 Janitorial • 1/2005 $2,644.40 Paw Chki 000073 1/24/2005 OCA-WIRE ONLY 0101-21719 OC/VSpendIng Accounla 0101-21719 DCA/SpeiMling Accounla 0101-21719 OCA/SpendIng Accounts Total OCA-WIRE ONLY $30551 1/10/05 $1,325.58 1/10/05 $772.10 1/19A)5 $2,403 19 FSA -1/10/05 FSA -1/10/05 FSA -1/19/05 PaM Chki ®074 1/24/200$ DELL 0 227-20200 Accounts Payable O 227-20200 Accounts Payablo 0 227-20200 Accounts Payable O 227-20200 Accounts Payable Total DELL $1,284.80 C68992716 $1,284.80 C68902716 $1,284.80 C6S902716 $1,284 80 C689927IG $5,139.20 Optiplex HNSYF61 OpIiplHX 7HSYI-r.1 OpIlpteK 5PSYF61 Opilpio* 1PSYF61 Paid Chki 0800r:1&4/2005 DELTA DENTAL O 101-21709 G 101-15090 Dental Insurance Non Employee Ilealih tns Total DELTA DENTAL $1,472 90 37220072 $56 70 37220072 $1,52960 Dental Insurance -2/2005 Dentol Insurance -2/2005 0 101-20200 Accounts Payable ToUl DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY $510 00 MN02715005F 4th Oil 2004 CJDN $51000 PaMChki 080077 1/24/2005 DEW CORPORATION O 425-20200 Accounts Payable U 425-20600 Contiacis Payable Total DEW CORPORATION 112,460 00 RFP89 $7,540 00 RFP#9 $20.000 00 RTP #9 Navorio Fire RFP 09 Navarro Fire PaMChkf 080076 1/24/2005 OEX MEOIQ EAST LLC 1:613-49830-340 Oonoral/Vdveitlsing Total OEX MEOIQ EAST LLC $306 30 24150349000 $306 30 Directory Advertising Paid Chk# 080079 ir24/2005 OPMS U 101-20200 Accounts Payable Total OPMS $25772 149895 $257 72 Magazines, Punch r^ald Chki 080080 1/24/2005 E-Z RECYCLINQ 1:101-43270 310 Contract Recycling Pickup Total E Z RECYCLINQ $6.784 96 7556 $6,784 96 Rocydtng -1/2005 Paid Chk#0081 1/24/2005 EARL F. ANDERSON A ASSOC. O 101-20200 Accounts Payable $467 30 63951 Total EARL F. ANDERSON A ASSOC. $467 30 Struut Signs PiiHjChki 060062 li^4/200& EGAN MCKAY CLLCrRICAL CON rKCTK G002 70200 Accounts Payable $/42 1/ JC10000130 Total FGAN MCKAY ELECTRICAL CONTRCIR $742 17 Powei Repair - IS PaklC hKJ 080003 1/24/200b EHLER3 AND ASSOCIATES INC. (1415 20200 Accounts Payable $7500 23428 ToUl EHl-ERS AND ASSOCIATES INC. $75 00 TIF Tax Payment #2 Paid Chki 080064 1/24/2005 EMBEDDED SYSTEMS O 101-20200 A ccounti Payable $3,727.50 31024 Decocder Boards • Sirens _______j CITY OF ORONO 01/21/051:32 PM Page 4 Check Detail Register® JANUARY 2005 Check Amt Invoice Comment t-t r. ToUl EMBEDDED 8Y8TfMS $3,727.60 Paid Chki 050065 1/24/2005 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC E 101-43000 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $139.78 BC010605-1 Strobe Light 0602-20200 Accounts Payable Total EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC $44 30 ST081904-5 Bulb $184.08 Paid Chki 060086 1/24/2005 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS 0 602-20200 Accounts Payable $46 78 82962 0601-20200 Accounts Payable 0101-20200 Accounts Payable Total ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS $46.78 62962 $198.63 83106 Plan Copies Plan Copies Copies $292.19 Paid Chki 080087 1/24/2005^ ERICKSON. KURT O 101-20200 Accounts Payable Total ERICKSON. KURT Paid Chki 080088 $13.00 12/2/04 $1300 Henn Chiefs Meeting 1/24/2005 FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT E 101-42110-201 Office supplies $874.32 73-79-84-92 Total FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT $874.32 2005 CKalions Paid Chki (T;ViT;9 1^4/:FRESHWATER SOCIETY G 101-20200 Accounts Payable Total FRESHWATER SOCIETY $735.00 11377 Rm Rental-Elections $735.00 Paid £M(i 1/24/2005 Q S K SERVICES 0 602-20200 Accounts Payable $40.00 1006329690 Uniforms G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $80.73 1006329890 Uniforms 0 613 20200 Accounts Payable $6.02 1006329890 Uniforms 0 601-20200 Accounts Payable $1341 1006329890 Uniforms 0 101-20200 Accounts Payable $98.961006329690 Mat Service - PW E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts 8 Accessories $60.60 1006336358 Shop Toweis E 101-43000-226 Clothing & personal equipment $77 28 1006336358 Uniforms E 601 49400-226 Clothing & personal equipment $1303 1006336358 Uniforms E 613-49830-226Clothing & personal equipment $602 1006336358 Uniforms E 602-49450-226 Clothing A personal equipment $40 00 1006336358 Uniforms E 601-49400-226 Clothing A personal equipment $12.43 1006342656 Uniforms E 613-49830-226Clothing A personal equipment $6 02 1006342856 Uniforms E 101-43000-226 Clothing A personal equipment $7453 1006342856 Uniforms E 602-49450-226 Clothing A personal equipment $37 29 1006342856 Uniforms Total OAKSERVtCES $566 32 Paid Chki 080091 GENUINE PARTS CO. G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $6 36 815265 Carb-Chok G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $7 35 615480 O-Rings G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $10 54 815793 Bulb G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $1382 616312 Hilch Pin G 613-20200 Accounts Payable $1007 816335 Bypass. Clamps G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $8.18 816335 Thomostat, Gasket G 101-20200 /Vccounts Payable $2981 816389 Misc Supplies G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $55 89 817094 Shop Supplies Q 101 20200 Accounts Payable $10.84 817676 Bulb 0 101-20200 Accounts Payable $4 78 818334 Tap O 101-20200 Accounts Payable $38 28 616358 Floor Dry Total GENUINE PARTS CO.$195.92 j CITY OF ORONO Check Detail Register© 01/21/05 1 32 PM Page 5 JANUARY 2005 )2 1/24/2005 GEO ANALYTICS E 101-41000^01 RepairB/Malnt-Offk:e Equip Total GEO ANALYTICS Chec k Amt Invoice Comment $3.642.50 2955 2005 Govern Support $3,842.50 PaUrbiikil ^^80093 1/24/2065 OERRINO'8 CAR WASH E 101-42110-402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $6 00 1/6/05 Car Wash Total GERRING*8 CAR WASH $6.00 Paw ChM 060094 1/24/2005 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL G 601-20200 Accounts Payablo O 602*20200 Accounts Payable ToUl GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL $60.95 4120649 $60 95 4120649 Locates - Oecomber 2004 Locates - December 2004 $121.90 PaW ChlUP 060095 1/24/2005 GRAFIX SHOPPE G 101-20200 Accounts Payable Total GRAFIX SHOPPE $244.95 38894 Graphics - Sqd 198 $244 95 PaW Chk# 060096 1/24/2005 HENN CO CHIEFS OF POL. ASSOC. G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $30.00 6923 Total HENN CO CHIEFS OF POL. ASSOC. Legal Update $30.00 Paw Chk# 080097 1/24/2005 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $62.22 89777 Total HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE $82.22 "PalTCHTTl Ice Mett 0098 1/24/2005 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TECH DPT G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $65.98 24127175 G 602-20200 Accounts Payable $52.35 24126064 Total HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TECH DPT $138T3 >ald Ct)kjn Database Accoss PW Radio Rental 12AM 109 1/24/2005 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $536.54 426 Total HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF Booking Fees -12/2004 $536 54 Paid Chki 080100 1/24/2005 HENNEPIN COUNTY TR-TAX PYR SRV G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $616 42 TNT Total HENNEPIN COUNTY TR-TAX PYR SRV 2005 TNT Notices $61642 PakJ Chki 060101 1/24/2005 HIN8HAW A CULBERTSON G 101-20200 Accounts Payable G 101-20200 Accounts Payable G 101-20200 Accounts Payable G 601-20200 Accounts Payablo G 101-20200 /\ccounts Payablo Total HINSHAW& CULBERTSON $775.76 $125 60 $132 00 $7600 $1,300.00 $2,411 36 10439719 10439720 10439720 10439/20 10439721 Applications • 11/2004 Nelson/Cartson Vacated Oak PI Pogonis Boat Dock-2740 ShadyMW Water Tower Lease AT&T Council Mtgs - 11/2004 l^ald ChM 080102 1/24/200!> INT’L ASSOC OF PLUM.MECH OFFIC E 101-42400-433 MembflttMpt & Subscfipllont $150.00 27898 Total INTX ASSOC OF PLUM.MECH OFFIC $150 m ‘ 2005 lAPMO Membership-Oman i Paid Chki 080103 1/24/2005 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL ' E 101-42400-433 Membarshipt & SubtcnpUont $100.00 04-0424000 2005 Membership ToUl INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL $100 00 PeW Chki 080104 1/24/2005 KENNETH N. POTTS, PA 0101-20200 Aooounta Payable $2,500.00 1/3A)S Prosecutions -12^004 CITY OF ORONO 01/21/05 1:32 PM Page 6 Check Detail Register© JANUARY 2005 Check Amt Invoice Comment Total KENNETH N. POTTS. PA $2.500 00 PaloChki 000105 1/24/2005 LEAGUE OFMN CITIES G 101-20200 Accounts Payable Total LEAGUE OF MN CITIES $315 00 1-000016857 LMC Conference-Moorse $315.00 PaldChk# 080106 O 101-20200 O 101-20200 O 101-20200 G 101-20200 G 101-20200 0101-20200 1/24/2005 LOGIS Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Total LOGIS $286 00 $1,676.00 $196.50 $286.00 $30 00 $196.50 $2.87V.'00 24694 24694 24694 24694 24694 24694 VB Scripts. SSL Security PoHce Records 11/2004 Internet 11/2004 VB Scripts. SSL Security Henn Cty Connect 11/2004 Internet 11/2004 Paid Chki 080107 1/244K)05 LONG LAKE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE E 101-42110-433 Memberships & Subscriptions $55 00 1/5/05 E 101-41300-433 Membersh^ & Subscriptions Total LONG LAKE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE $55.00 1/5/05 $110.00 2005 LL Chamber Mbrshp 2005 LL Chamber Mbrshp Paid Chk# 080108 1/24/2005 LONG LAKE GLASS INC. E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts & Accessories $116.92 36211 WlndoMr«423 Total LONG LAKE GLASS INC.$116.92 Paid Chki 1109 1/24/2005 MEDICA E 101-42110-135 City Benefit Contribution O 101-15998 Non-Employee Health Ins G 101-21706 HospkallzatlonA/ledIcai Ins O 101-15998 Non-Employee Health Ins 0101-21706 HospitallzatlonAlledk:al Ins G 101-21706 Hospitarization/Medical Ins G101-21706 Hospitalization/Medical Ins Total MEDICA $374.75 105032102552 Medica High-2/2005 $1,175 12 105032102552 Modica High - 2/2005 $11,611.52 105032102552 Medica High-2/2005 $731.11 10503212548 Medica Elect - 2/2005 $11.211 00 10503212548 Medica Eloct - 2/2005 $731.11 105032134225 Medica Essentials - 2/2005 $1,760.70 10532122585 Medica Low - 2/2005 $27,595.31 (>ald C\nik 08bl 10 1/24/2005 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS E 602^945^383 MWCC-Current Charges Total MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS $25,338.15 787511 $25,338.15 Wastewater Charges -12/04 Paid Chki 080111 1/24/2005 MOCSA E 613-49830-433 Memberships A Subscriptions Total MOCSA $100.00 Steffenhagon 2005 MGCSA • Steflbnhagen $100.00 Paid Chki 080112 1/24/2005 MIDWEST ASPHALT 0 101-20200 Accounts Payable ToUl MIDWEST ASPHALT $442.64 58956MB Asphalt $44264 Paid Chki 080113 1/24/2005 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 0101-20200 Accounts Payable $33.68 RI12040843 G 101-20200 Accounts Payable Total MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY $22.45 RI12040844 Cylinder Rental Cylinder Invoice $56.13 Paid Chki 080114 1/24AKX>5 MINNESOTA UC FUND G 101-20200 /Kccounts Payable Total MINNESOTA UC FUND $701.67 7989288 Unemployment - Hendricks $701.67 i^aid Chk# Oilbl 1S 1/24Q005 MINNETONKA SPORTSMEN INC. E 101-42110-433 Membenh^ & Subscriptions $35.00 2005 2005 Memberslup 1 u \CITY OF ORONO Check Detail Register© 01/21/06 1:32 PM Pago 7 Total MINNETONKA SPORTSMEN INC. JANUARY2006 Check Amt Invoice Comment $35.00 Paid Chki OeOffS 1/24/2005 MJOA E 101 -42110 437 Training & Development Total MJOA $105.00 WUlke $195 00 MJOA Conference - WWIke PaldCKki 060117 1/24/2005 mk CHAPTER OF APMO E 101-42400^33 Memberthlps & Subsalptlons Total MN CHAPTER OF APMO ^aldChki I $50. K) Orono $50.1^ 2005 MNAPMO Membership OTTi 1/24/2005 MN DEPT Of AGRICULTURE E 613-49830-441 Licenses A Taxes $10.00 20020574 Total MN DEPT OF AGRICULTURE ilO.OO 2005 Appflcalor License PaWChk# 060119 1/24/2005 MN DEPT OF HEALTH - CON FEE 0601-20602 Due to govts-Stoto $1,176.00 1270041 Total MNDEPTOFHEALTH-CONFEE $lj7S00^ 4th Qtr 2004 Connection Fee Paw Chk# 060120 1/24/2005 MN GOVT FIN. OFFICER'S ASSN E 101-41600-433 Membershi| s & Subscrlptlorui $40 00 Kuehn E 101-41500-433 Memberships A Subscriptions Total MN GOVT FIN. OFFICER'S ASSN $40 00 Olson $8000 2005 MGFOA Membership 2005 MGFOA Membership PaWChk# 080121 1/24/2005 MN STATE TREASURER O 101-20200 Accounts Payable 0101-20200 Accounts Payable Total MN STATE TREASURER f’aU Chki ($315.16) 1260 $7.87^^ 1280 $7,563.79 Surcharge - 4th Qtr 2004 Surcharge - 4th Qtr 2004 3122 1/24/2005 MUNICIPALS E 101-41300-433 Memberships A Subscriptions Total MUNICIPALS $20.00 2005 $20 00 2005 Munipals Membership PaW Chki 080123 1/24/2005 NAVARRE HARDWARE 0 602-20200Accounts Payable $8.07 144523 Morlor Mix 0 601-20200Accounts Payable $1302145683 Marking Paint. Key O 101-20200Accounts Payable $4.25 145714 Torpedo Level O 101-20200Accounts Payable $32.29145752 Paint, Primer G 101-20200Accounts Payable $477 145806 Pipe Cleaner. Glue 0 101-20200Accounts Payable $1601 145916 Urinal Block. Sponges 0 101-20200Accounts Payable $20 19 146031 Batteries. Brackets 0 101-20200Accounts Payable K76 146091 Rope. Dishwasher Refill Q 101 20200 Accounts Payable $17.10146147 Volcro G 101-20200Accounts Payabki $1 36 146166 Nuta/Bolts G 602-20200Accounts Poyabto $1480146175 Foam Sealant O 101-20200Accounts Payable $6 34 146227 Bulk Chain 0 101-20200Accounts Payable $3 7?146265 Denature Alchohol 0 101-20200Accounts Payable $5.52 146505 Galv Collar. Bleach O 101 20200 Accounts Payable $6 58 146647 Galv Coupling. Nipple O 101-20200Accounts Payable $102.00146745 Batteries G 101-20200Accounts Payable $8.29 146757 Primer. Enamel O 601-20200Accounts Payable $3.18 146759 Cap O 602-20200Accounts Payabto $1328146795 Fibow. Rope, Insert Total NAVARRE HARDWARE $287 60 PaW Chki 080124 1^472005 NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE O 101-20200 Accounts Payable $60.00 161256 1st Responder Refresher CITY OF ORONO *Check Detail Register® 01/21/05 1:32 PM Page 8 Total NORTH MIEMORIAL HEALTH CARE JANUARY 2005 Check Amt Invoice Comment $60.00 PaidChk# 080125 1/24/2005 OSULUVANS • HOLIDAY sH G 101-20200 Acoounti Payable 111.72 12/31/04 Car Washes • 12/2004 Total O'SULLIVANS-HOLIDAY 646 $11.72 Paid chki mom mmm o'sullivans holiday 547 0101-20200 Accounts Payable $166.08 12^1/04 Total O'SULLIVANS HOUDAY 647 $166 08 Car Washes 12/2004 l^aid 060i27 m4f2005 OBRIEN, RANDY E 101-43000-226 Cloth' v & personal equipment Total OBRIEN. RANDY $100.00 1/14/05 $100^ 2005 Safety Hoots PaidChk# 080128 1/24/2005 PIONEER G 101-20200 Accounts Payable __ Total PIONEER $1.0M 52 122504 Ordinance 22 Paid Chk#PLUNKETTS 0101-20200 Accounts Payable Total PLUNKETTS %207BS $207 68 516291 Pest Control 12/2004 PaidChk# 080130 1/24/2005 PRAIRIE OFFSET E 101-41900-201 Office supplies Total PRAIRIE OFFSET J50805 121218 $508.05 Envelopes, D Cards Gappa paMChii# vi4i^6os rumpcaco .inc G 101-20200 Accounts Payable ToUl RUMPCACO.INC $6000 $60.00 12/16/04 Brush Disposal PaidChk# 080132 1 /24/2005 SAFETY SIGNS G 602-20200Accounts Payable $181.58 42963 Barricades 0 602 20200 Accounts Payable $214 60 42964 Barricades Total SAFETY SIGNS $396 16 1/24/2005 SAMARiraM TIRF m IMH E 101-42110 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip $571^217610 Tires ToUl SAMARITAN TIRE CO INC $571 56 PaidChk# 080134 1/24/^6oi SBC PAGING 0 101-20200Accounts Payable $57.80 600009202610 Ponce Pagers Total SBC PAGING $57 80 PaidChkii 6A6h5 1/24/2005 SCHARBER S SONS 0 613-20200Accounts Payable $199.11 2045262 Air Cleaner Assembly Total SCHARBER & SONS $199 11 PaidChkJl 6lioii6 1/24/200is SECURINT • ACCOUNT 5742 0 101-20200Accounts Payable $22.50 5742-2004123 Credit Reporta • 12/04 Total SECURINT-ACCOUNT 6742 $22 50 PaidChk# 080137 I/24/260S SEW LIKE NEW 0 101-20200Accounta Payable $68 69 2004 Scale Hoods 0 101-20200Accounts Payable $273.12 2004 Alterations. Patches Total SEWUKENEW $341 81 PaidChk# 060138 1/24/2009 8TREICHERS CITY OF ORONO Check Detail Register® 01/21/05 1:32 PM Page 9 JANUARY 2005 Check Amt O 101-20200 G 101-20200 O 101-20200 O101-20200 G 101-20200 G 101-20200 G 101-20200 Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Total STREICHER8 $459.50 $59.95 $14.38 $13.90 $85.90 $14367 $77995 1228948 1228969 1229200 1231366 1232046 1233628 1235475 Shirts, Pants • Fischer Pants - Russeth Lithium Battery Name Tag -Toewe Shirt - Fischer Holster. FlashNght - Wittke Ballistic Vest-Toem $1,557.25 ^aidchk* 080139 1/24/2005 SUBUR^ TIRE. ROCKFORD G 101-20200 Accounts Payable ($204.96) O 101-20200 Accounts Payable Total SUBURBAN TIRE-ROCKFORD $269.15 10030851 10030851 Tires #431 Tires #431 $64 19 PaW Chk# 080140 1/24/2005 T.L STEVENS 0101-20200 Accounts Payable ToUl T.L STEVENS $226.22 4014 Repair Pump • ilackberry $226.22 l^aldChK# 080141 1/24/i0O5 THE BERRY COMPANY E613-49630>340 General Advertising Total THE BERRY COMPANY $135 00 9524739904 $135^00 ' Directory Advertising ¥ald thkk 080142 lii4/2005 TOLL GAS A WELDING SUPPLY Q 101-20200 Accounts Payable $50.80 336069 E 101-43000-221 Equipment Parts A Accessories 0101-20200 Accounts Payable Total TOU OA8 A WELDING SUPPLY $31 18 338182 $6.24 464617 Welding Supplies Welding Supplies Cylinders $88.22 Paid Chlcr 1/24i^005 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED G 101-20200 O 101-20200 O 101-20200 G 101-20200 G 101-20200 G 101-20200 G 101-20200 G 101-20200 G 101-20200 G 101-20200 Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Total UNIFORMS UNUMITED $28 92 $1529 $32.95 $695.95 $511.10 $1379 $21407 $755 34 $51 07 $426.51 249456 249972 250182 250657 250666 250960 251195 251391 251393 251471 Patch - Fischer Bar Commondation - Ski TurtlonocK - Persoll Ballistic Vest - Stensrud Uniform - Stensrud Bar Commendation Srgt Badges - Fischer Uniform - Stensrud Mace. Mag Holder - Stensrud Uniform - Cornick $2.744 99 Paid Chk# 080144 1/24/2005 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE E 101-42110-322 Postage $66 00 Box 86 Total UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE $66 00 Annual PO Box - PD Paid Chk# 080145 1/24/2005 VERIZON DIRECTORIES E 613-49830-340 General Advertising Total VERIZON DIRECTORIES $36.40 390009561059 Directory Adv - GC $36 40 Paid Chk# 080146 1/24/2005 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 0 602-20200 Accounts Payable $106.33 150586 Total VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER Boot Covers. Liners $10633 Paid Chk# 080147 1/24/2005 WAYZATA, CITY OF G 602-20200 Accounts Payable G 601-20200 Accounts Payable $592.97 1/13A)5 $2,322.74 1/13^5 Water/Sower 4th Qtr 2004 Water/Sewer 4th Qtr 2004 CITY OF ORONO 01/21/05 1:32 PM Page 10 Check Detail Register© JANUARY 2006 Ch*cti Amt hmtle* Comnwnl ToM WAYZATA,CITYOF $2,916.71 PMbhkf m WESTSIOeEQUIPMEirr 0101-20200 Accounts Payable Tout WE8TSI0E EQUIPMENT $26.02 27032 Rotor, Vane 126.02 PaU ChUP 0N140 1/24/2O05 ZARMOtM MUSH VVORkS G 101-20200 Accounts Payable $460.10 06786 Sweeper Broom Total 2:ARN0TH BRUSH WORKS $460.10 10100 Primary Cash $200,353.80 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 227 IMPR/EQUIP CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 402 MUNICIPAL ST AID ST CONSTUCT 406 PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT REVOLVE 415 2001 SENIOR HSG TIF CONST FUND 425 NAVARRE FIRE STATION PROJ FUND 601 WATER OPERATING FUND 602 SEWER OPERATING FUND 613 GOLF COURSE 601 STORMWATER UTILITY OP FUND 10100 Primary Cash $93,651.52 $5.139 20 $9.902 42 $10,381.03 $7500 $41,181 00 $4.203 64 $31.426 71 $647.43 $3.745 05 $200.553 80 '■. a,, fR */>• • t JAN Z 4 2005 .ClIYUHOIVJ^O INFORMATION ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING KccTifsJG JAN 4 2005 OF Oil Y ur uriUr^u •» L«W A The West Hennepin Recycling Commission (WHRC) A Report on the Year 2004 for Orono ’s Council and Director of Public Works 12 January 2005 In the Year 2004; • fhe City of Orono collected rccyclabics totaling PRCXiRAM TONS Curbside Collection 1,047.55 Clean-up day recyclabics 25.86 Total tons abated from the waste stream 1,073.41 JAN I 4 2005 Gl IY Ol- OHONU • 61.82% of your residents participated in the curbside collection program. • Hosted two Salvation Army collection events for all Wl IRC cities that collected a total of 36.5 tons. • Continued the two sort co-mingled curbside collection process. • Resupplied cities with curbside recycling bins. • Provided city with a select can and bottle recycling container. • Renewed Joint Powers Agreement and curbside contract with E-Z Recycling (Ijotli e.\pirc 12/31/07). • The cost to Orono for all WHRC ser\'iccs in 2004 was $9,310. Ohiectives for the Year 2005 include: Retain a WHRC annual budget of no more than $24,500 by scheduling only one mobile Salvation Army collection. Add soA cover books to curbside recycling paper collection. Upcom ing Event Saturday May 7 9 am - I pm Salvation Anny collection at Ort)iu> Intermediate School Parking Lot Respectfully submitted. Anu'Ua Krocficr, Recycling Coordinator RecyclopediNf Waste Reductioa Guide, is on*iine at: http://nieiiil)ers.aol.coin/ackruegcr/recycle.htiiil - printed on high post-consumer recycled paper - CONDENSIilD MINUTES OF THE HEGUIAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278 .---r-TiMn HELD ON DECEMBER 7, 2004 JAN 1 4 2005 The regular meeting of the Board of Education of Orono Indb^<?i^enL^^'^ School District No. 278 was held on Tuesday, December 07, 2004. Preoent:Michele Kuni'. Dick Lewis Neal Lawson Jack Veach John Malone Martha Van de Ven Karen Orcutt Absent:Mike Basil UPON MOTION by Micliele Kun/, seconded by Dick Lewis, tlie consenl agencia was approved as to] lows: approved the minutes oi November 0, 2004; - ap|)ioved tiie CommuniLy Education Director Conti act for 2004-06; « approved tiie M«*ntorinfj/Family Outreacli Coordinator Contract tor 2004-06; • approveii the Community Education Program Assistant Contract tor 2004-06; a|)proved the Aquatics Coordinator Contiact for 2004-06; approved the Discovery Center Ciiild Care Site Supervisci Contract lor 2004-06; approved tiie Early Chi Idliood/Discovery Center Site .Supervisor Contract tor 2004-06; .ipproved the Manager of Early Cliildliood 6 Discovery Center Cont I'act for 2003-06; - approved tiie School Age Care Site Supervisor Contract tor 2004-06; - approved the Asoi.vUant to Community Education Director Contract for 2004-06; accepted tiie resignation of Adrienne Gil by, Orono High Scliool teacljei, effective January 21, 2006; - accepted the r esignat i or. of Tammy Dresser-Snyder, Software Support Specialist tor the District, effective November 22, 2004; approved office checks 7244 through 7251; ap[u oved the bills as covered by vouchers 138795 through 139168; Motion carried. ORONO ALL!ANai PRESEN'm^ Tlie Orono Alliance is a volunteer group that works to raise funds feu Orono Scfiools, .insisting with v.ii louji financiiil needs oi Orono. Rt-pr es«*ntat ives Sus.in Bieon ami Allison I.uedke of the Alliance presented a grant check for $430,000 to the District. Dr. Orcutt mid J.ick Veacfi expressed their thanks tor ail the hard work and the generosity of the Alliance. L r ORONO HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING UPDATE: Principal, Dr. Carl Shutts reported it has been an exciting year so far. In this first year of service goals, the National Honor Society will present- a $22,000 check to the Florida school they assisted througn the "hurricane relief" fund raising campaign. He reported Orono High School is promoting "sober prom", sobriety expectations are being shared with the students and parents. Dr. Shutts introduced Jill Brudigan a counselor at the high school. Ms. Brudigan reported on the online -’Discover" Career Planning program. She reported tlie goal of the program is to help students find the college that is the best fit for them. ORONO SIGN: The Boaid received a recommendation regarding a new Orono electronic sign. Dr. Shutts reported on the steps taken in exploring possibilities of updating tlie Orono school signboard. Dr. Shutts stated we are looking to get more messages out, more tim<?ly, and efficiently. UPON MOTION by Martha Van de Ven, seconded by Dick Lewis, the Board of Education appioved t.iking tlie next steps to replace the existing sign. Motion Carried. ANNUAL FINANCIAL AUDIT REPORT:The Board received a jecommerulat ion to accept the 2003-04 fitumcial audit report as snbmitteci l>y Malloy, Montague?, Karnowski, Radosevich t, Co., P.A. Mr. Lawson introduced Ken Malloy wl»o gave a brief overview of the audit lesults. After completing tlieir lUidit, their financial opinion is that t lie financial data is accuiate. MEMBER Dick Lewis introduced tiie following Annual Financial Audit Report as suimutted by Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A., and moved its acceptance: ANNUAL FINANCIAL AUDIT REPORT ON FILE IN THE DISTRICT OFFICE. Tlie motion for the acceptance of tlie foregoing report was duly st^conded l>y Martlia Van de Ven and upon vote taken theieon tfie following vot <*d in favor theieof: VEACH, KUNZ, VAN DE VEN, LEWIS, MALONE AB.SENT: BA.SH And the following voted against the same: NONE Whereupon said report was declared duly accepted. j