Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08-19-1991 Planning Packet
jrr- Planning Commissions^Council 1 PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. CITY OP ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, AOGOST 19, 1991 - 7:00 P.M. 1275 BRONN ROAD SOUTH - COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - Edward Callahan ATTENDANCE - ULED PUBLIC HEARINGS - 7:00 p.iB.1. #1668 City of Orono, 700 Old Crystal Bay Rd North Preliminary Subdivision, Class III 2. #1676 City of Orono, 700 Old Crystal Bay Rd North Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing - City Engineer to Present 7:30 p.m.3. #1670 Jeunes & Penelope Grabek, 3050 Jamestown Rd & 3105 Sixth Ave N Subdivision for Septic Easement 8:00 p.m.4. #1675 Nina Wlldman, 560 Sussex Circle S 3045 Sussex Road - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement, Class I ACTION ITEMS -> Review of these items will commence prior to or between scheduled public hearings. Applicants presenting variance requests before the Commission are asked to move to the podium at the front of the Chambers when their application is announced by the Chairman. 5.#1608 James R. Hartzell, 2987 Casco Point Road - Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing 6.#16^3 Mark Johnson, 4465 Bayside Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Continuation of Public Hearing 7.#1669 John Walker, 1310 Spruce Place - Variance - Public Hearing 8.#1671 Bruce Turner, 3800 Wayzata Blvd ■ Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing #1672 Konrad & Kay Marine, 235 Hollander Road *■ Variances - Public Hearing #1673 Daniel J. Kluth, 2601 Fox Street - Variance - Public Hearing #1674 Thomas & Alice Stuck, 4365 North Shore Drive Variances - Public Hearing !. 'ji. ■m 1’ • • •. CITY OP ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, AUGUST 19, 1991 - 7:00 P.M. 12. #1665 Thomas McCarthy, 1424 Baldur Park Road - Variances - Referred back to Planning Commission by Council Planning Coaimission Comnents - 13. Report by Planning Commission representative to Council meeting of August 12, 1991. 14, Status report by Lake Use Committee representatives. 15. Status report by Facilities Committee representatives 16. Other Issues. Additional It^s - 17. Pianning Commission approval of minutes of the May 6, 1991, Facilities Recommendation meeting. 18. Planning Commission approval of minutes of July 15, 1991 meeting. 19. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend September 9, 1991 Council meeting. Adjonznaent - k -!':T ill M i k . fs To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson » L From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:August 16, 1991 Subject:#1668 City of Orono, 700 Old Crystal Bay Road North Preliminary Subdivision (Class III) - Public Hearing Xoning District: RR-^IB Pertinent Ordinances A.Chapter 11, Class III - Subdivision of two lots. Lot 1, Block 1 * 14.11 total acres Wet = 2.2 acres Total Dry = 11.83 acres Lot 1, Block 2 = 2.56 acres dry List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Application Property Owners List and Certificate of Mailing Plat Map Preliminary Plat Wetlands Plat Map Exit Drainage Plan Preliminary Review Comments of MCWD Review of implication Zoning The property is located within the area designated for change as a result of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2. Current zoning is RR-IB. Each lot clearly satisfies standards of 2 acre rural residential zoning as property will receive sewer and water. The following zoning districts were approved: B-6, PRD, PUD, R-IA (1 acre minimum lot size), R-IB (1/2 acre minimum lot size), and M-6 (6 units per acre) zoning. Lot 1, Block 1 is proposed as the future site for the comprehensive municipal facility. Lot 1, Block 2 may be developed under B-6 zoning reaulring 2 acres in area and 100' minimum width. Current PUD ordinance Section 10.53 for Highway 12 corridor would not allow development of Lot 1, Block 2 as a PUD. The required area for PUD development is 5 acres. As property to the Immediate west is no longer proposed as Hennepin County library site, properties may be joined for a future PUD development. :V 1 L. Zoning File #1668 August 16, 1991 Page 2 of 4 Access/Road Outlet A shall be designated and dedicated as a public road. The eastern portion of Outlet A, although under current private ownership, shall now be reclassified as a public road. The City will provide maintenance once roadway is constructed to City standards. The roadway will be Installed at a 28“32' width with a 10' wide bike trail path along north side consistent with Park Commission plans for bike trail extending from east to school. As roadway will not be fully extended to Willow Drive, the City will ask for a temporary cul-de-sac. The owners of both Lots 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 will provide temporary access and utility easements over portion of cul-de-sac not included within 60' wide outlot. All access to Lot 1, Block 2 shall be via outlot. No direct access onto Highway 12 will be allowed, consistent with original Comprehensive Plan Amendment Number 2 for Highway 12 area. Based on the lineal footage adjacent to Old Crystal Bay Road for Lot 1, Block 1 at 1250 feet, one additional access may be allowed but that access must align directly with a curb cut to the west side of the road serving school property and preferably to the north so as not to conflict with major traffic exiting and entering from Outlot A. fletlands/Dralnage The 2.3 acre wetland located within Lot 1, Block 1 is predominantly a Type 2 wetland consisting of grass areas interspersed with willow trees and pockets of cattails. The owner shall grant a flowage and conservation easement over the designated wetland. City wetlands maps do not show wetland extending through the north lot line of Lot 1, Block 1. Review Exhibit D. The preliminary plat shows the wetlands extending to the property to the north; this has been confirmed on field inspections. Please review Exhibit F, the exit drainage plan. The major jjxalnage from this site commences at the designated wetland area that drains to the northeast through the property to the north and east and eventually under Highway 12 to a drainage ditch that drains between the Washington Scientific property and the Long Lake Industrial Park, then extends eastward along the railroad track and eventually to the drainageway that finally drains to Long Lake between Burger King and the shopping center. This is the drainage ditch that is most sensitive to 100 year storms and creates major drainage problems for substandard storm sewers of the City of Long Lake. Adequate retention on the site will be a key for receiving approval from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District.i J- - Zoning File #1668 August 16, 1991 Page 3 of 4 Staff has enclosed a preliminary report by the Watershed District of an original drainage plan submitted by the engineering department. This plan would have involved the excavation of portions adjacent to the wetland involving excavations to the 1016 elevation. As the MCWD report notes, all forms of retention must be above the 1018 elevation that will require berming of areas above the 1018 to approximately 1019 to 1019.5. The City is at the stage of preliminary discussions with the MCWD in order to determine the best means to provide adequate retention on-site and yet satisfy water quality concerns. The City's interest will, of course, be to minimize the impact on dry buildable land needed for development purposes. In any case, if excavations are proposed within the desginated wetland area or within 26' of the designated wetland, a separate conditional use permit and variance will be filed by the City of Orono once development plans are finalized. Once again, review Exhibit D. Note the retention area to the northwest of the property and the invert along the west lot line of Lot 1, Block 1. Drainage comes from major portions of the school at the west. Drainage from the north comes along the road from a small watershed on the east side of Old Crystal Bay Road. Drainage at the northwest seems to be retained in the lov/, wet area. Drainage from the school appears to fan out until it finally reaches the lower elevations of the designated wetland at 1018. These drainageways will be addressed with the final drainage and grading plans for the municipal facility. dation To approve the preliminary 2-lot plat of the City of Orono of Lot 2, Block 1, Willow Properties Addition finding all standards of the RR-IB zoning district have been satisfied. This approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.Current owner to provide a public road to the east lot line. The temporary cul-de-sac to be installed at the east end per approved plans. 2.Owner to grant temporary access and utility easements over portions of temporary cul-de-sac not located within 60' road outlot. 3.Owner to grant flowage and conservation easement over wetlands designated at 1018 elevation. 4.Proposed Outlot A and Outlot A, willow Properites Addition to be now designated as a public road. The City of Orono to maintain once construction is complete A Zoning File 11668 August 16r 1991 Page 4 of 4 5. 6. 7. and approved by the City. The City to formally reclassify Outlot A, Willow Properties Addition as a future public road. Access to Lot Block 1 shall be provided from Outlot A. This property shall be limited to one other additional curb cut along Old Crystal Bay Road based on length of frontage adjacent to roadway. Lot 1, Block 2 shall achieve access only from Outlot A» the future public roadway. No direct access onto U.S. Highway 12 shall be allowed. Notice to applicant and owner that any alterations of the existing wetland designated at the 1018 el^^vation or within 26 ’ of that wetland shall require a separate conditional use permit and variance application with the City. Any others deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission. CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION “y c O C> I r> CL ■v>vo?‘7^/ ^ a, y. I I /* Site Address R, lJ-3 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Please check one - Property t^^abstract or •5 3 - ^0 oo 3 torrens? Attach legal description to application APPLICANT NATna 1 / sj ^ V" (0 Phone (home ) Phone (work) Address : P C> ftj-ir/. ^Citv:(^Zip: .^^323 OWNER (if different than appl^-cant) MJITHA 11 n J7 Phone (home) Phone (work) Citv:Zip: (attach list if more than one)0 EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size / Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total/ all parcels Present Use (check)Residential; no. of units i/Other (specify) .... PROPOSAL Present Zoning District R ~~ I ^_ _ __ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) S”.bdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:I / Existing Units ‘ New Units Total Units proposed Gross Densxty: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Units per _ _ Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) # • . I* IZNIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION L* Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Cercificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of.owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). ^ ^ As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 2. I. :ertification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is somplete. ioning Official's Signature^_ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date k •Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments), t. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. I. Title opinion. I. Easements, Covenants, etc. I. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. |«rtification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete Ioning Official's Signature _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date- - - - - - - - - «BS Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III)$150.00 Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement 250.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) 250.00 300.00 + 20.00/Lot - Final Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* he applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or •quested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, lenning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and iirther agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. >plicant's Signature a fi Date 7 - 9/ 0 mer's Signature 1/f/^4^ is i Date ipllcant must have all submittafs into the City offices 25 days before the .annlng Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the ilrd Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is leble to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an ithorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning flee of this change prior to the meeting. CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OP MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO ) SS. I, Linda Vee, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1668, was mailed to the attached list of property owners . In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 30th day of July, 1991, mm V . . j • .r•• ; O r-‘ ' 'W-.t*'*.v4>- V .C'vi' - ‘ i- f i j I - ' 28-U8-23 34 0001 28-118-23 43 0005 Orono ‘School District #278 ORONO COMMUNITY CHURCH 795 Old Crystal Bay Rd N 770 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N Long Lake, MN 55356 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 28-118-23 43 0006 ALBIN THIES 1442 HOMESTEAD TR LONG LAKE, MN 55356 33-118-23 24 0001 ROBERT WAGNER RT 1, BOX 305 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 33-118-23 24 0002 JOANN R FROST TRUSTEE 521 WILLOW DR N LONG LAKE, MN 55356 ^ 33-118-23 12 0002 \ HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY « RIDGEDALE DR & PLYMOUTH RD MINNETONKA, MN 55343 33-118-23 12 0003 WILLOW PROPERTIES EDINA PROFESSIONAL BLDG 4945 HALIFAX AVE S, ST 7 33-118-23 13 0011 VEDA INC P.O. BOX 375 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 j 33-118-23 13 0009 iWASHINGTON SCIENTIFIC iP.O. BOX 340 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 August 9, 1991permit Annlicntion No. 91»1L4: Applicant: CityofOrono P.O. Box 66 Ciystal Bay, MN 55323 Location: City of Orono, Sec. 33AB . Purpose: Stormwater management plan for construction of a municipal ottice complex on a 14.1 acre site north of US Hwy. 12 and east of Old Crystal Bay Road. * • • . • Anniicable Rules; Rule B - Stormwater Management Plan for Individual Projects Rule D - Welland Alteration F.Yhihits Reviewed: 1. Permit Application 91-114 received August 5,1991 2. Drainage plan dated August 5,1991. 3. Hydrologic calculations dated August 5,1991. 4. Preliminary plat dated July 26, 1991. .^tnff Review Summarvt The proieci involves construction of a municipal office complex including a public works building, police station, city offices, city meeting hall and associated^>^ways and parking areas on a 14.1 acre site located north of U.S. Hwy 12 and east of Old Crystal Bay Road in the City of Orono. T ; existing site contains a 2.3 acre wetland which ^ains to the north off the propeny. The drainage path then bends to the south crossing Hwy. 12 through a 24-inch culvert into the City of Long Lake where it ^ains along a (htch f ro^gh the downtown area across Hwy. 12 and into Long Lake. This ditch has been the subject of review on several previous occasions with concern expressed about erosion problems along its banks. The wetland is generally grass and willow interspersed with some pt^kets of catt^ails. Cattails are an indication that portions of the wetland may be considered Type 3 with the remainder likely to be considered Type 2. The District regulates Type 3,4 and 5 wetlands greater than 0.5 acre in size. The existing outlet of the wetland is elevation 1017.9. The applicant proposes excavating an area including a portion of ^e w^land, which would discharge through a 15-inch culvert with an outlet elevation of 1016. The pond is designed to address District rate control and water quality treatment requirements. The connguraaon as proposed would drain the weUand 1.9 feel lower Ihim the existing outflow eievaiion Staff recommends that a configuration be designed which maintains the 1017.9 outlet elevation for the wetland. The applicant notes that construction of a public works building is to pr(xeed this fall with the other proposed buildings projected for 1992. Grading and construction plans have not been submitted for the proposed construction. Rpcommendation: Table pending receipt of: 1. Construction plans for the portions of the project proposed under this peimt. 2. Revised drainage plan providing an outlet elevation for the wetland of lOl/.y.\ \ 9 of 12 . AM ph . & Permit Application 91-114 Page Two 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Hydrologic calculations demonstrating conformance with District rate control and water quality treatment standards for a plan providing a wetland outlet at elevation 1017.9. Determination of the type of the on-site wetland. Qarification of the area and storage volume of elevation 1018. Erosion control plan prepared by a qualified individual which shows proposed methods for retaining waterborne sediments on site during the period of construction and how the site will be restored, recovered or revegetated after construction. Revised plan including the proposed baffled weir structure detail. « '' •• . V \ - Sim *;:5 s Mr ■/ • u /I ■.r' -r-fL Mi, mm 'A ri - i To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members Acting City Administrator Gerhardson From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:August 13r 1991 Subject: #1676 City of Orono - 700 Old Crystal Bay Road North Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Soiling District: RR-IB Pertinent Ordinances A. Section 10.27, Subdivision 3 (A) - Public Service Structure In order to complete the municipal water improvement project planned for the Hwy 12 area, a water tower site has been selected at the the north side of Hwy 12, within the future site of the proposed municipal facility. A conidtional use permit and .publi*: hearing is required for the water tower, a public servcie struct?.fA, as the location of the tower was not specified at the time ot ^-he public hearing for the improvement project. Setbacks: Required Proposed 50' 50' List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit A1 Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit S - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Application - Cook's Report Plat Maps Certificate of Mailing Property Owners List Staff Letter to Cook Municipal Water Plan fcr Hwy 12 Improvements Site Plan Elevations of Proposed Water Towers Staff Comments Glenn Cook has been asked to complete the review and present the conditional use permit application before the Planning Commission at their upcoming meeting. Cook's review comments have been enclosed (review Exhibit A-1). The reference to filling the wetland which requires a separate conditional use permit and variance# will be covered under a separate and comprehensive conditional use permit application for the municipal facility improvements. Cook's report also notes a 25' setback from the tower to wetland. The setback will be changed to 26 id I ^ I Bonestroo Rosene Anderlfk & |\|| Associates Engineers 9i Architects Ctte (3. kf.cr^ PI flottt W. ^1. JOSCSA C. AA^It ^f. M5W L Scrvjia. Pi 1 ^|. Or!h ff. Cm. ^|. TTom^i I. Noyci ^1. fmcn a ScN/fKn F„1 M. I5c??n CJ a. A. So«0o^ PI. W. hw, PM. CorH0 c PI mVr/ K 9CUfC0f\» Pi VjfliA.HlfW,P.|. TkCHP^Pi. V C.*3C« T. tewCWfl. PI. •occf? I. PWftrfc, PM Cl/^ O PI W PKMOA. Pi V^atr C. P£ jms £ Mgcina Pi. ICP.-/W1 P Ahctnoo. PI V|/n P. Pf l0£ef! C. luiVN. At A TP«m« I AAgvi). Pf Hdwa« A Pi X lc;r»n. PI MiflA. k\APi. PJ^«Oj;ClJv%flPI urrjd Mi/er.a PL VJrt 0. WdSL PI L AnmcA AfA opiy P. P>4jn0r. PL MDU L >n«A PL 1. P^ Gnyp li. Pi Cr^f C PWT»^ A/A A^i M A'CP Jrr/ 0 Ptmcn. pi Csioa 03V41 Pi iczeft I. P|. 9 j7 w Mow PL ClW L Wf.TW. P|. Xrthl vua Pi Cfin« A frctson Uc M PfAfflV WIfljnM Cien August 14,1991 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Gty of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: 13954 Elevated Water Reservoir Conditional Use Permit • #1676 Dear Jeanne: The Qty of Orono is proposing to construct an Elevated Water Reservoir east of Old Crystal Road on the north end of the Oty property. The reservoir is necessary to provide adequate fire protection for the Orono School and indusuies along TH 12. The reservoir will be located 470 feet east of Old Qystal Bay Road and 50 feet south of the north line on the Gty property. The reservoir will be 155 feet high and provide 400,000 gallons of storage. The reservoir will be located 25 feet from the edge of the wetland and filling will be required adjacent the wetland. The access road to the reservoir will require filling of approximately 0.2 feet over 640 sq. ft of the wetland. The reservoir will be approximately 360 feet from the church building located on property to the north. The tower w^ be approximately 600 feet from the Orono Elementary School located west of Old Crystal Bay Road. There are cunently no structures located on property to the east of the Gty properly. We have enclosed a plan of the water reservoir types that will be considered for construction, llie Gty currently favors hydropillar design, 'ne second plan indicates existing and future water main construction and locates si^tificant buildings adjacent to reservoir site. I^ease contact this office if; ou have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ^NDERUK A ASSOCIATES, INC OlennR.Cook OROlk Enclosure fi- CITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION . Site Address ____Old Property Identification Humber (P.I.D.) Ple^ise attach le^al description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name (Zth V<m r\ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address P/^ £,6,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Clty^-^ zip ■y-g-3;^ OHNER (if different than applicant) Neune rm l^<trseL_ Phone (home)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone ^ 73 3 O P— Address J ^/*40 City (iJft y 7_/aY>4< - 3 .^ Date Property Acquired _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _(month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTE ■ APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review {+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Appeals Other - see fee schedule ■i kOliJli PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY ^ Present Zoning District ^ ^ Present Use of Property __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Residential o otner (specify)_ hLS. DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST i t U. Describe request in detail: e tTr a lu aTTv_ _ _ _ _ _ _ 466,000 fcX.AJ'g__aj^__ ^a<e. Z/ai/V* /'^—-______________________________ 2. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete Initials of Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred r6vi.0W of tihis applicatio’'^^ and C0rtifi6s tihati th© information supplied is true and correct to the be.«t of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signaturejf Ol,Date 'I’-3.4 OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Ccincil members for purposes of investigation and verification of.this request. Owner 's signature erizicarion or cnis requeat. Date f/z/fZ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building fi Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. { i oisi m IT3 (I) ::i. \x • *1? H /»<»f " i*'r lilt'** i • • \ H i S. » 'E ty» 4$ m . .’?TTyOy_«<^%4 J —--------________________________/ • H ""“••“““■••-a. . . . _ _ vt' •« ^ ep X ^ . j . (£^ • ^ (JW ? Kl? ^ •« «c €tV{ f ■; ■ »■ i;l “rnr^nrsT- t - ‘ fl # #« ••/ " r»;' t / ■------auuu L- Ife ■ar '-V L CERTIFICATE OF MAILIRG STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO ) SS. I, Linda Vee» of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1676, was mailed to the attached list of property owners . In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 30th day of July, 1991. '■m ' -'i '«■: "' Vi I-' % • r ..-• V I "'S: --. »■ :TT#»ir"'’V.•!»a 1 0 28-118-23 34 0001 28-118-23 43 0005 Orono School District #278 ORONO COMMUNITY CHURCH 795 Old Crystal Bay Rd N 770 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N Long Lake, MN 55356 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 28-118-23 43 0006 ALBINTHIES 1442 HOMESTEAD TR LONG LAKE, MN 55356 J3-118-23 24 0001 . ROBERT WAGNER XT 1, BOX 305 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 33-118-23 24 0002 JOANN R FROST TRUSTEE 521 WILLOW DR N LONG LAKE, MN 55356 .33-118-23 12 0002 HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY RIDGEDALE DR & PLYMOUTH RE •MINNETONKA, MN 55343 J3-118-23 12 0003 ... fILLOW PROPERTIES 5DINA PROFESSIONAL BLDG 1945 HALIFAX AVE S, ST 7 lINNEAPOLIS, MN 55424 33-118-23 13 0011 . VEDA INC P.O. BOX 375 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 33-118-23 13 0009 WASHINGTON SCIENTIFIC P.O. BOX 340 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 ♦ •• . . • *. / vr »• . *-*■ % .* *t • • .. . • — r- r * • • - .* • , r • . w • «h:* •• 1 1 r.T : • K • • . l*.'** .*.l — -t ,- -. . - • • -• *— 1 i ^ • f «» •f. *1 %■■■ ki “j; t %1^ I *■ -iif^.V o o/. • \ *V;*x \ - * i. A'/ CITY of ORONO Municipal Offlccs Post Office Box 66 Cr}5tal Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066 August 2, 1991 Glenn Cook Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik 6 Associates 2335 West Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 Re: Applications #1668 - City of Orono Preliminary Subdivision #1676 - Conditional Use Permit for Proposed Watertower Involving Property Located at 700 Old Crystal Bay Road Dear Glenn: I shall ask that you complete the review of application #1676 as the Zoning staff has very little involvement with this phase of the improvement project on Highway 12. Exhibits should consist of some of the following items: — Site plan/survey locating watertower, setbacks from wetland and north lot line, and setback of nearest structure on adjacent properties. - Elevations, specs, etc. of watertower — Plan of existing water system within Highway 12 area and location of proposed lines resulting with installation of watertower. Please Include any other additional information that you feel will be helpful for the Planning Commission's review. It is imperative that the application not be tabled or delayed another month at the Planning Commission. The same can be said of application #1668, the subdivision application for the City facility property. Please continue to work along with Mark Gronberg on the application before the Watershed District. Your main responsibility for the subdivision review will be the discussion of the drainage. telephone - 473-7357 • FAX • 4734B10 m Glenn Cook Re: Review of Applications #1668 & 1676 August 2, 1991,. . Page 2 of 2 We ask that either you or a representative of your firm be present at the Planning Commission meeting of August 19th so that questions posed by the Planning Commission need not result xn a tabling because of the Inability to answer questions pertaining to drainage, etc. The two applications have been placed at the fjpQUt of the agenda commencing at 7:00 p.m. Your attendance time at the meeting may total less than 1 hour just In case you have a tight schedule that evening. I have enclosed a scaled-down copy of the survey of the preliminary subdivision. We understand through Mark Gronberg's office that you have received large-scale copies of both the subdivision and the topo. Please see that the City receives a copy of the watertower site plan no later than August 9th.^ This plan will be used for the members of the public who wish to review the plan at the City offices. Please contact my office if you have any questions or if the request to have you attend the Planning Commission meeting xs a problem. Sin -rerely. -■^anne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator JAM/tln Enclosure ir r — -- -— f. -vl r I'v To:Orono Planning Ccrnission John R. Gerhardson, Acting City Administraici From:Michael F. Gaffrcn/ Aspt Flaming & Zoning Adn^iniatrat.oi Date:August 9, 1993 Subject:#1670 James & Penelope Grabek/Ben & Denise Young 3050 Jamestown Road/3105 Sixth Avenue North - Subdivision for Easement Purposes - Public Hearing Zoning District: - RR-IA, Single family rural residential, 2 acre, unsewered Application: ~ Subdivision for creation of easement between property owners to accomodate septic system encroaching across property boundaries. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Staff Letters of April 9 & 19, 1991 Pertinent Code Section Subdivision Code Section 11.03.66 (A)(3) defines a Class I subdivision to include creation of a private easement for any purpose. Discussion The Grabek residence was constructed in 1987-88. The septic system started to experience seepage shortly after the Grabek*s moved in. Subsequent investigations into the reasons for failure eventually lead to reconstruction of that system, including an extension to the north and east. As part of the reconstruction, the uphill toe of the mound was approved at a distance of 4* from the north lot line due to limited site conditions based on the slope orientation and house location. The reconstruction and additions were completed apparently per the plan, and the system was accepted as conforming. More than a year later, when the Young's were having lot lines surveyed in conjunction with replacement of falling septic system, it was found that the fence apparently presumed by all parties during construction as the lot line, was actually 10-12* north of the lot line, left a portion of the uphill dike and toe of Grabek's over the property line. their their line being This mound k r Zoning File #1670 August 13, 1991 Page 2 In letters dated April 9 and 19, 1991, City staff advised the property owners that if they wished to resolve this encroachment, their options would include a lot line rearrangement or the creation of an easement. It was staff's recommendation that the mound not be reworked to place i\. within the property boundaries, because such work would have high potential for damaging the entire system from construction traffic and site compaction (see staff letters of April 9 and 19). It was also determined that removal of portions of the toe of the mound without a major revision to the rock bed and downhill slope, could potentially result in seepage towards the property line. The two property owners were able to work out an agreement for the creation of an easement within the Young property. The Young's will still get credit for this area for zoning purposes, and this will avoid the problem of the complex reconfiguration of lot lines which would be necessary to result in no lot area revise CMS, since Grabek's lot is just 2.0 acres. Staff Recoamendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed easement as the most reasonable solution for this septic system encroachment. (This situation anti one o< In-i on Si] vet Keadow Drive have prompted the Inspections Department to require additional lot line staking for all new septic system installations and repairs, so that the potential for future similar situations will be reduced.} Isv X r #10;CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATI property location Sits Address 3105 6th Avo. N., Long Lake, MN 55356_ _ _ _ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 28-118-23-320007 Please check one - Property X abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application CITY OF DRW !35im 01 QEH 250.00 CHECK. JL 250.00 RECEIPT^THm YOU ^219210 cool ROl TOB: 07/24/ APPLICANT Name James and Penelope Grabek Phone (home)476-J444 Phone (’*'ork) 555-4000 Address: 3050 Jamestown Rd.City: Long Lake zio: 55356 OfiNER (if different than applicant) Name Ben and Denise Young Phone (home)473-6820 Phone (work) Addrssss 3105 6th Av0* N.City; Long Lake Zio: 55356 (attach list if more than one) A EXISTING LAND USB Number of Tax Parcels Development Size n/A 2 Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total# all parcels r:Present Use (check)Residential; no. of units _2 Other (specify)_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ Present Zoning District RR-13 PROPOSAL _ _ _ _ _ _ __Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites OTHER Subdivision for septic easement Number of Building Sites: __________ Existing Units N/A New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: N/A Minimum Lot Size: N/A Proposed Use: (check) N/A Units per Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) 1^. * * L RUN 0ATE*07/lVn ■ A: , 'i V 'S'{. ‘ ' HE»«£PIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM •A* -V »-1 ' u RATCH 001 J • PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR i, i- • •• -VA' b ^ S I* *• L bi o* • «i ■; •1^ «■ :••. j fr;.. ^ jJ , EO-118-tS Zt 0001 i;,j; : f PROPERTY OltCRS LIST ' A •! 0X150 \ HOHESTEAD FLOYD E BUSCNBOH F E BUSCmOH 1150 HOMESTEAD TRAIL L0N6 LAKE m 4 4. i ^ * % u) tr • ••■« :. ' j 1 ETAt,! j! t*' < ■ - - -^ . M* * • • \ PROP AODR ^ OWCR NAME TAXPAYER 38 28-118-23 32 0002 03020 SIXTH AVE N F A M BUSCHBOM FLOYD E BUSCHBOM 1150 HOMESTEAD TRAIL LONG LAKE MN 55356 i \ 4 4 HENRY A NANCY BRANnNGHAM NAME/AODR >3185 CO RD NO A> •f* ii V -Ijriil '.W.V. .■ i’’'. ■ i- .;i \ ' .u_L iA 5vri ■ i ■ : . 1 ‘ ■ ‘ ; , ■ HEW CO PARK RESERV ' ‘ * ' < ' ^ ‘ 1 ‘ . ueku frt ttaoif DcePDl/ 38 28-118-23 32 0007 03105 SIXTH AVE N BAD YOUNG BENEDICT E A OENISE E YOWG i 3105 6TH AVE NO LONG LAKE W 55356 tl U :■ < ,r >i ••f 38 28-118-23 32 0013 0 bROP AODR r ^03025 > .■ SIXTH AVE t OWER NAME :>JEFFREY S ECCLES , TAXPAYER .^JEFFREY s’ECCLES •:}»*• Vui v NAME/AOOR • 'V30E5 ATH AVE N • T 4'' ^ i Tv . /' M'd ■ ' iK • i ■ :> LONB LAKE MN .. 5335A j j- j» t f i . ) • "i *4 , i ; -5-1; f!.38VEb-lU-23 33 0009 - MOP UHM 'IMM38.'.' ADDRESS UNASSXGNED A: v . RESERVE OIST HEW CO PARK RESERVE OIST 3800 CO RO NO 24 MAPLE PLAIN W 55359 U A. • PROP AODR 00036 V.OWER NAME ji'JAMES R 6RABEK ST AU ADDRESS UNASSIGNED t V. • . . ■ ■ ! '^1. >f-‘K■i TAXPAYER . JAMES R 'ORABEKl'-;. ;| l-t.i- 'A - ijpMByAnn* ;• 3,5050 JAMESTOW RD G * * .^i^LONB LAKE W >i‘5535A 38 28-118-23 33 0010 03065 JAMESTOW RO GAB LARSON I |i * i ■ i. h *'.;{ • ?■ ' M85 JAMESTOW RO' i . I j ’ I . . t v.i. ' : ._______ _______________ ‘ * -1 ^ i \. % PROP AODR !1 » |S8] 28-118-23 33 0014 \ 'JiOWER NAME <t TAXPAYER '; :^ii;HICHAEL . A > LAUREL' AMES !03l75r JAMESTOW RO .MICHAEL ANES.A LAUREL 'ANEStr <t. J 38 28-118-23 33 0015 03050 JAMESTOW RO * R GRABEK A P J GRABEK JAMES R A PENELOPE J GRABEK 3050 JAMESTOW RO REPORT NO. P1435401 PAGE 38 28-116-23 32 0003 03060 SIXTH AVE N FRANCES H JOHNSON FRANCES M JOHNSON , 3060 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE MN 55356 ..i- i Ui-::[■ • 1 ‘I * •* H j' ;f :.1< 1' j % ^ t3 j S • f ^ b ‘ kJi ( 38 28-118-23 32 0008 03045 SIXTH AVE N JAB RYDER JOHN D A BARBARA Y RYDER 3045 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE W 55356 <’ ‘S ' ■ ' 5 * v( V I. ■’>' i 38 28-118-23 33 0008 03065 JAMESTOW RD J P A S K KOOB ' JOW P A SUSANNE K KOOB 3065 JAMESTOW RO LONG LAKE W 55356 ' » » 38 28-118-23 33 0012 03155 JAMESTOW RO S A S STROUP STANLEY S STROUP 3155 JAMESTOW RO LONG LAKE W .55356 r '» i i • 4 >. ) ■ - r. ■ •',Jc r. % .»1 • • I ■•! 1 : 1' i TOTAL BATCH . -I 001 00014 ‘l J • ' .V » M •» ■ J % • ,.s xf I rail, ] i!; jUi.4 i,)''vj'»8 | ' Ria" j]-* I r'» •* ’’j' T; i ?!^ 'J ^ ' • ‘’V- i ' * •r- k • ■ . ^^f;kh -IkI I, ' t;.!i; !•; ■ ;i '''"'A i’ -M ■li , ii- •: ' • r? !!|i J'r > !■ '* :.. ii ‘ r i ~ I »■! ■ |ll■rill■ iPBRiM mihbp■ —\ CITY of OROX Post OffiCe Box 66 •Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323 • Municipal Offices QF - QRQIUO^On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka Apiii 19, 1991 Ben Young 3105 Sixth Avenue North Long Lake, MN 55356 James Grabek 3050 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Re: Options for Resolving Septic System Encroaclunent Gentlemen: Per our discussion on April 12th, this letter is to define the encroachment of Grabek's septic system into Young's property and offer possible methods for the property owners to resolve this. The new lot 12' south of the rockbed ended up in the plan, the concerns, appear if the fence was line as staked appears to be approximately 10- fence line adjacent to the mound. Althovcrh the 16' from the fence line rather than 22’ as ni'own sandbed and mound toe in relation to drainage to meet the standards approved for this system the lot line. Based on the newly staked correct lot line, the rockbed at its closest point is about 7' from the line. The sandbed extends at its furthest point, 3' across the line into Young's property. The toe of the mound (the limits of drainage deflection) is approximately 5' over the line at its greatest encroachment. The proximity of the rockbed 7' from the actual lot line precludes the possibility of accommodating the uphill dike and drainage within Grabek's property. construct a retaining wall between the rockbed and the lot line while still leaving an adequate drainageway. Given the circumstances, moving the mound system is not a reasonable alternative. This system has already been added onto once, and additional traffic around it to make changes to it to the east. The following options might be considered as reasonable solutions, for the property owners to consj ‘*** ■UILOING 4 ZONING - 473-7357 ASSESSING administration 4 HNANCE - 473-T35* FAX-4734SW PL BLIC WORKS - 473-7359 ---— Ben Young, 3105 Sixth Avenue North James Grabek, 3050 Jamestown Road April 19, 1991 Page 2 of 3 1. Grabek acquires an easement of approximately 10'-12' wide and 80'-100' long, the north line of such easement coinciding with the old fence line (see Diagram 1). This would involve a surveyor describing the easement and an attorney drawing up a fairly simple easement document for City approval. Young would retain ownership of the easement area. The easement would be for "drainage and septic system" purposes. Such an easement between property owners would leave Young as owner of the easement area. Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth confirms that the area of the easement would still count towards Young's dry buildable area for zoning purposes. 2. The property owners could do a lot line rearrangement subdivision which would cover exactly the same strip of ground as would the easement, except that Grabek would acquire the strip of land and his lot area would increase slightly while Young's lot area would decrease slightly. 3. A third option is a lot line rearrangement subdivision by trading equal areas. In this case, per the attached diagram, property owners would trade equal sized parcels,^ so that each lot would gain acreage in one location while losing an equal amount in another location. The diagram indicates one of many possible equal trade lot line rearrangements, but it is noted that Grabek should not trade away area next to his alternate site, so that the availability of that site for future use is not diminished. Based on the Orono subdivision code, any one cf these three options, including the easement, is considered a Class I subdivision that requires City approval. The subdivision application fee is $250.00 plus a $75.00 filing fee collected at the end of the process. The property owners' cost of survey work to create the easement might be slightly less than those costs for the subdivision. With either a subdivision or an easement, the application would go to the Planning Commission for a recommendation and directly to Council for final approval. I see no reason why the City would disapprove any of the three options noted . mk • • • » Ben Young, 3105 Sixth Avenue North James Grabek, 305C Jamestown Read April 19, 1991 Page 3 of 3 Please feel -'free to contact me at 473-7357 if you have further questions or comments. Sincerely, y/VL'./ ^ •/ - / C* / A Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/tln Enclosures - Option Diagrams Subdivision Code Excerpts cc:Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Steve Schirmers, S-P Testing Jim Stewart, Quickway Excavating V; 1 / i: : « : {\ . ••ill i. i: ’1 1 • ^ i' f •» ^ ■mm - - ^ —*rcW/--rrr/--r// /^- .■■ V^/-/ //■■'/■/^ I •• \ » • I '■ •. L2..!.-J^I<^l'-yO^ (ui^eSMAp :Jl£-^e-*seiig^^ <*nup_ . _______ Pg&?g(2T/ J$T}WS TT^ SP<^^ ■ •• • W . - J • ♦ * • ••_ • . • :r.-* »: .A • • . N^aj/ oivns^ ^uA<^ ^rgAC>€5 t^MT'!i > m.• .. ...Fhe-,:.euT^^ use . . • i #1 I • I .1 t• ••••.«• •»•••••• »^ / ^\:3 I ■• !i' 4Imh • •• •« .*•#•••• • •••. m « • « * • - L I . • I t * ——•1-T-- *• *1 * ,!| : 'I t * • »• ■ • •I I • ••f•* —: I •; I .I« • • «w m m »• *•• ♦• ••- I i «• «» •«•• • • •• • • r I <«• ^ J.- • J J sell, lease, or develop any interest, ^ot, pa.-s-, u..i., plot in a subdivision. /L“n^d^^J^let°";i.n:ifowSrln?o°^^^^^ parcel, or tract lona-cerrr. leasehold interests where -ne parcels, tracts, j interest necessitates the creation of creation of the lease for'" residential, coranercial, industria-., streets, roads, or J^groof , except those separations;or other use or any combination tne.- , a Where all the resulting parcels, a. ^11 Ha 70 ac’’e<= or larger in size and 500 fe-tlots, or interests will be 20 larger in size for in width for residential uses commercial and cenatery lots; . Llulting ? =m court orders, or the adjust s' ehi riiocaticn or a common boundary as long Tealh o%'lh% tTo rLulting- lets meets the recuirements oe the zoning Chapter o£ the City Code. 66e Su..division, Classification". "Class T Subdivision ” - A Class I subdivision Shall >=e'exempt from platting ^:tc??be^\by rie1u\1re^Land Vu°rle7or i£ it criteria: 1 The subdivision results in than two buildable Un^^'and e^°ch ToV has" at least lorfferof'^fJontagl^on a Pf^roaSway Spen'^tf travel or and opened by the City o easement between persons or between vehicular “®® ?“citr and where no flexible zoning application or, irt«sion"of "m!nfiipal Ttllilties is involved: 2. The subdivision is a division o property previously combined for j?“/f°?|®'consists °f ‘U® oteation or alteration^ a public or private easement any DQ]T]pOS0« « yt b. "Class II Subdivis^^on* |“ro«VuVe%?ttblithed ^'n‘th?s ?hap?rr if it meets all of the following criteria; 1. The subdivision results in no ”o« than two buildable lots, °"® ""i^nfo^^onrir both of which have tils'%h'aV"«^“°f/e\“of%ro1.t^^^^^^ a public roadway which has been (4-1-34) jvi ' orono cc V f • CITY of ORON •. . <• op-rr QROMO^ Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323• Munidpai Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka April 19, 1991 Ben Young 3105 Sixth Avenue North Long Lake, MN 55356 James Grabek 3050 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Re: Options for Resolving Septic System Encroachment Gentlemen: Per our discussion on April 12th, this letter is to define the encroachment of Grabek's septic system into Young's property and offer possible methods for the property owners to resolve this. The new lot 12* south of the rockbed ended up in the plan, the concerns, appear if the fence was line as staked appears to be approximately 10- fence line adjacent to the mound. Although the 16* from the fence line rather than 22* as shown sandbed and mound toe in relation to drainage to meet the standards approved for this system the lot line. Based on the newly staked correct lot line, the rockbed at its closest point is about 7* from the line. The sandbed extends at its furthest point, 3* across the line into Young's property. The toe of the mound (the limits of drainage deflection) is approximately 5' over the line at its greatest encroachment. The proximity of the rockbed 7* from the actual lot line precludes the possibility of accommodating the uphill dike and drainage within Grabek's property. It is not feasible to construct a retaining wall between the rockbed and the lot line while still leaving an adequate drainageway. Given the circumstances, moving the mound system is not a reasonable alternative. This system has already been added onto once, and additional traffic around it to make changes to it would not only risk damaging the mound but would potentially do additional compaction to the alternate drainfield site directly to the east. The following options might be considered as reasonable solutions, for the property owners to consider: BUILOiNG & ZONING - 473-7357 assessing administration 4 n\ANCE - 471-7358 FAX-4734)510 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 Ben Young/Jcunes Grabek April 9, 1991 Page 2 One option that comes to mind is reworking the uphill dikes of the mound to pull them back from the actual lot line. I would recommend against that option, because the dike is there to physically support the sand and rock bed, is required to have a 3:1 or flatter slope for ease of maintenance and erosion protection, and helps to divert drainage around the mound. Any additional construction activity around the mound is not recommended, and could damage the mound. The best option in my opinion, is to revise the lot line or create an easement to accomodate whatever mound encroachment is determined. Your revised lot lines should maintain a minimum of 4* to the toe of the mound as determined by Steve Schirmers (designer of the system). I suggest the following course of action: 1.Both property owners and their surveyors should come to an agreement as to the actual current location of the property line. Enough stakes should be placed by the surveyors along that line so that its location can be readily observed. 2.Schirmers should verify on the site the location of the^ toe of the mound. Presuming that this point encroaches into Young's property, a new proposed lot line or easement should be at least 4' north of the toe. 3.Schirmers should verify that the newly proposed lot line or easement boundary is at least 10' north ot the "soil treatment area", ie. the area of possible influence by the mound. City inspection staff will be pleased to meet with the property owners and Schirmers once the surveyors have agreed to and properly staked the correct lot line. At that time, any questions you may have regarding procedures for lot line rearrangement versus easement can be discussed. Be advised that the City is not taking the position that a lot line rearrangement or easement must occur; the determination to do this is up to the property owners. Please contact me at 473-7357 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Michael P. Gaffron Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Enclosures: Mound Cross-Section Sketch 1988 Approved Plan cc: Jeanne Mabusth Mark Bernhardson Steve Schirmers MPG/lsv aiWlil 11 i. 1 ^ 1 1 •7^*’* ’'.O coff ?^.PuT5"' - ~ idi dU.K u«- iii{::c. I .itv * .....jtit -•♦yJiyt.V**-* *rrJiT -TTTVV' ■ - ^ V -.i^TT To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members Acting City Administrator Gerhardson From:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planhing & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: August 13, 1991 #1675 Nina W. Wildman, 560 Sussex Circle/3045 Sussex Road - Lot Line Rearrangement - Public Hearing Xoning District ~ RR-IB, Single family rural residential, 2 acre, unsewered implication - Lot Line Rearrangement List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey/Site Plan Pertinent Facts ~ 1.Applicant is proposing a lot line rearrangement between Lots 3 and 6, Block 2, Fox Bend. Lot 6, 3045 Sussex Road, has an existing residence. Lot 3 is vacant. 2.The intent of the lot line rearrangement is to place the entire area of the wetland located in Lot 3, into the currently developed lot. 3.Acreages before and after this lot line rearrangement are as follows: Lot 3 Lot 6 Before:Dry Wet Total 3.59 Ac. .37 Ac. 2.05 Ac. .22 Ac. 3.96 Ac.2.27 Ac. After:Dry Wet Total 3.18 Ac. .26 Ac. 2.46 Ac. .33 Ac. 37T4 Ac.2.79 Ac. 4.The proposed subdivision does not significantly affect the useable building envelope for either lot, and has no impact on drainfield sites. Sim itftoiiT II •• «. Zoning Pile #1675 August 13, 1991 Page 2 Discussion The proposed subdivision leaves substantial area in Lot 3 for development of a residence structure without forcing encroachment of the drainfield sites. Lot 6 gains area around the pond, making that lot slightly larger and perhaps more attractive to a buyer. In reviewing the location of existing drainage and utility easements, there may be no specific need to vacate the easement along the pre-existing south line of Lot 6, and it could be argued that that easement should stay in place to allow drainage from Lots 3, 4 and 5 to reach the wetland. The dry kuildable acreage in that existing easement totals approximately .02 acre, not of consequence. Staff would recommend that a drainage and utility easement be granted by the applicant on either side of the new lot line, legal description to be provided by applicant's surveyor. Legal descriptions and labeling of the survey tracts as Parcels A, B, and C will have to be done by the surveyor per our standard format. Staff Re endation Staff recommends approval as proposed, subject to granting a new drainage and utility easement 5' either side of the new lot line. Isv I % ■ • - (ii)‘ CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION // laSM ---------------------------------------------- / I r/^' ’ y PROPERTY LOCATION / // ® Site Address 6^0 <K$!>>yy Property Identification Numbe Please check cne - Property 7r (P.I.D.) '32 f'//V'?7-72 -0^/7 abstract or ____ torrens?ClTi Cf DRC^O FWmE OFFICEf 7“,VV*/WWVViX Wt^V^WVVV Attach legal description to application. _____________ CEh' 250 ,00 Phone (home)■ ..... ^219650 cool m 715:: Phone (work) ‘/7S-^?2/2 £<./ 07/26/9 APPLICANT Name a//jI/j Cl/. u//2 City: ----------- Zip; OWNER (if different than applicant) Name S/f^^__________ Phone (heme) Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size 5~. gy O, 5*9 Acres Jry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total/* all parcels Present Use (check)Residential; no. of units Other (specify)________ PROPOSAL Present Zoninc? nisrrict ^6__________ ____________________ mm mm mm^m mm mm mm • m mm mm ^mm mmrn Division foir Tax Purposss Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no^new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites ^ 2. X Number of Building Sites:Existing Units New Units Total Units Units per dC AcresProposed Gross Density; _ Minimum Del: Size: Feet Dry Euildable Land proposed Use; (check) ---------tl.------ other^"speLfy)^ a . • • » • ••* OT*• • a • • a • \ '■** MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Completed Application Form 2 ^ Center 348-3:71). ^ 4. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list, of . obtain any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature^_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II S III)$150.00 .A'Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) 250.00 250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non—residential)300.00 ■► 20.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicnt's Signature 2z . ) A yd__ Date Owner's Signature Date Anplicant must have all submittals into the City offices .25 days, before the planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ij fii 111%-fliiiilii OUT-Ot * ( Ir ' r/ SM - • - • IX|1 \ \S 1 -It s 1 lifn <1U •* 1 s1 ^it 11(1 r1 M•3mn 1. - V* 1. RUN DATE 07/2<«/9l DATCH 001 PROP AOOR OHMER NAME TAXPAYER NAttE/AODR PROP ADDR OiHER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP ADDR OI«4bR NAME TAXPAYER t4AME/AD0R PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NiUtE/AOOR PROP ADDR D»4ER NAr^ TAXPAYER NAME/AODR HENTiCPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFOPMATIOf4 SYSTEM PROPERTY OW4ER5 LIST 58 09-117-25 31 0015 00960 SUSSEX LA N H A D C HILDMAN NINA H i DCR4ALD C HILDMAN 795 SPRING MILL RO 0R0f40 MN .55591 30 09-117-25 32 0002 05060 FOX ST J CHADHICK A K L CHADHICK JOSEPH A KAREN CHADHICK 3060 FOX ST L044G LAKE m 55556 36 09-117-23 32 0009 03120 SUSSEX RD N H A 0 C HILDMAN rilNA H A DONALD C HILDMAN 795 SPRir4G HILL RD (.R0f40 m 55591 30 09-117-25 32 0012 03175 SUSSEX RD N H A 0 C HILDMAN NINA H A D0I4ALD C HILDMAN 795 SPRING HILL RD ORONO MT4 55591 36 09-117-23 52 0015 03115 SUSSEX RD N H A 0 C HiLDMAN NINA H A DONALD C HILDMAN 795 SPRING HILL RD 0R0T40 Hr4 55391 PROP ADDR 0I A4ER NA4tE TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 09-117-25 32 0010 03011 SUSSEX RD N H A D C HILDMAt4 NINA H A DOr4ALO C HILDMAN 795 SPRir4G HILL RD 0R0I40 Ft4 55391 e PROP ADDR UHr4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 30 09-117-23 35 0010 03175 FOX ST DAVID A MAASS DAVID A MAASS P 0 BOX 592 LONG LAKE M4 55556 I PROP AOOR 0Ft4£R NAFS 38 09-117-23 31 0019 02990 SUSSEX RD N H A D C HILDMAN NINA H A DONALD C HILDMAN 795 SPRING !ULL RD ORONO MI4 55591 56 09-117-25 52 0007 05190 SUSSEX RD N H A D C HILDMAN NINA H A DONALD C HILDMAN 795 SPRING HILL RD 0R0f40 MT4 55591 58 09-117-23 32 0010 03050 SUSSEX RD N H A D C HILDMAN NINA H A D044ALD C HILDMAN 795 SPRING HILL RD ORONO MT4 55591 50 09-117-25 52 0015 00575 SUSSEX CIR N H A D C HILUMAI4 GERALD R A MARY JO ARf4ES0N 180 SPUR CIR MEDI44A MT4 55591 56 09-117-25 52 0016 03077 SUSSEX RD N H A 0 C HILDMAt4 JEFFREY S A KARE44 HETMERELL 11995 ORCHARD AVE H MI^J^^ETONKA MN 55593 38 09-117-23 33 0005 05099 FARVIEH LA A E HEFt4ir4G5EN JR ET AL ARTHUR E HEr4r4ir4GSEN JR 5099 FARVIEH LA LONG LAKE Ft4 55556 50 09-117-23 53 0011 03125 FOX ST A G CARLS0f4 A S J CARLSON ALAI4 CARLSON A SUSA14 CARLSON 3125 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55556 * REPORT NO. PI935901 PAGE 1 J 30 09-117-23 31 0015 02900 SUSSEX RO N H A D C HILDMAr4 NINA H A D044ALD C HILDMAN 795 SPRir4G MILL RD 0R0f40 M44 55391 J 30 09-117-23 52 0008 05160 SUSSEX 90 14 H A D C HILDMAN NINA H A D0r4ALD C HILDMAN 795 SPRING HILL RO ORONO MN 55391 38 09-117-23 32 0011 00955 SUSSEX LA N H A D C HILDMAF4 NINA H A OOrJALD C HILDMAr4 795 SPRiriG HILL RD 0R0e4D HT4 55591 50 09-117-25 52 0019 00560 SUSSEX CIR N H A D C HILDMAr4 NINA H A DONALD C HILDMAN 795 SPRIf4G MILL RO 0R0440 m 55391 58 09-117-23 32 0017 05095 SUSSEX RO 44 H A D C HILDMA44 NINA H A D0F4ALD C HILDMAN 795 SPRING HILL RD ORONO MN 55591 4^* 58 0<«-117-25 3$ 000<» 05091 FARVIEH LA J A S OUOZIAK JOSEPH OUOZIAK 5091 FARVIEH LANE LONG LAKE HN 55556 58 09-117-25 35 0012 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO A G CARLSON t S J CARLSON ALAN CARLS0T4 I SUSAN CAKLSON 3125 FOX ST LONG LAKE HN 55556 J ^.J J / \\rv//A j '' * // V -----------T"-* Hsrs^yr Jtaa^of 3.0' SemAa^ui/^^X^lc /f^i^JDft>st^ L^’T Uaj^ 1 To: From Date: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members Acting City Administrator Gerhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator August 8, 1991 Subject: #1608 James Hartzellf 2987 Casco Point Road — Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IC, Single family lakeshore residential, 1/2 acre, sewered Description of Request: Requesting lot coverage and average setback variances (hardcover variance also required) to construct swimming pool and patio. Pertinent Ordinances 1. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 Existing = 23.8% Proposed = 35.9% Allowed = 25% - Hardcover. (75-250' zone) 2.Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Average lakeshore setback - Proposing 25' encroachment past average setback line where no encroachment is normally allowed. 3.Section 10.03, Existing * Proposed « Allowed * Subdivision 8.3% 15.7% 15% 14 (C) - Lot coverage. Applicant's Statement of Hardship and Unusual Property Conditions 1. Pool area encroaches average setback line because neighboring homes are sited far from lakeshore. 2. All homes along shore are set far off lakeshore and distanced considerably from where pool would sit. Pool would not have negative visual impact on these neighbors. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - Exhibit K - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Neighboring Property Owner's Letter of Support Survey Site Plan, Existing Site Plan, Proposed Applicant's Hardcover and Lot Coverage Calculations Staff Review of Hardcover and Lot Coverage Plan View, Proposed PooZ and Patio/Landscape Areas Sketch, Average Setback Zoning File #1608 August 8, 1991 Page 2 of 3 Discussion The survey indicates that applicants own the adjacent residence to the south (3005 Casco Point Road), on a separate riparian lakeshore tax parcel. They also own the non-riparian lot upon which the tennis court sits. These two extraneous lots, because they are separate tax parcels, have not been included in the hardcover calculations. The hardcover review and site inspection by staff determined that applicants submitted hardcover worksheet had omitted significant areas of driveway, sidewalk, and the water surface area of the pool (this application was submitted in January, prior to the pool hardcover policy revision by Council). Existing 75-25C hardcover is 23.8%. Proposed hardcover without removals is 35.9%. The existing driveway serving applicant's property is fairly large, however, that driveway serves both of applicant's residences, and is mostly located in the 250-500' zone. Other than driveway areas, there is very little nonstructural hardcover which can be removed to compensate for the hardcover excesses. The average setback encroachment of 25' is defined by the neighboring adjacent houses, one of which is owned by applicant. The top of the fence surrounding the pool will be approximately 7' above existing grade at a distance approximately 40' lakeward of the existing deck. The neighboring residence to the north is offset approximately 140' from the proposed pool and is relatively high in elevation compared to the pool. The applicant's house at 3005 Casco Point Road, has some lakeviews across the pool area already partially screened by existing trees and vegetation. Lot coverage will be slightly over the 15% limit when the pool is included in the calculation. Issues to Consider 1.Will any neighboring properties have their existing views of the lake negatively impacted by construction of this pool/patio/retaining wall system? Is there sufficient hardship shown to justify approval of the proposed 25' average setback encroachment? (The pool will be 105' from the shoreline at its closest point). 2.Are there any potential structural removals or reductions which could keep this property within the 15% limit? Is there sufficient hardship to grant a variance for lot coverage? idaaaatfi 't Zoning File #1608 August 12, 1991 Page 3 of 3 3.Are there existing hardcover areas on the property which can be reduced or eliminated to compensate for the proposed hardcover excess? Is the fact that a single driveway and parking area serves two properties, with most of the hardcover on the lot with proposed pool, a potential justification for granting a variance? Are there other justifications for granting a hardcover variance, or a partial 'i^^rdcover variance? Recoannendation Options 1. Recommend approval as proposed. 2.Partial approval, specify limitations, or table for review of revised plan. Send on to Council, 3. Denial. 4.Other. iW taunt tmk I ( CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fe<^175.00^ ($50.00 per each addi^onal“"variance Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 /i' (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 2- f ^7 P^/aj /_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Q-l «.1 i >.I iV ; • t .•r V. rTT r nC * r* * * ^* «i * r* * w * ? 1- i . U‘< I AWk. ^ 7-- -.A-..-..i.n aww V ww vv L'-Cik 01 Tl * / I h.1 I ^ c W f -^r A » • VV r..r-r-0T_7u^>, I\W L 4. il f Vnli i/U T < j *r Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) - Hi U'l'i /Ti'i Hi*. 7-:? 3 1 0 0 2,^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Phone (home) * ~ ^ ry /?. ^A/L Tierce. Address: _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (work) ^ VC -y ;2 7 aj City: 5‘T' _ _ Zip: ^ ^ OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address:City;Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) • T7V rrI f Ul W'mWHO I(^do7) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. __‘Jt-FnE —— — — —— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ^ ——— —— — — — — — »> PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY ^ Present Zoning District _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Use of Property __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ i 7-i"iwwLwV vv vv kWM . * / V VV ,L khjt Vis Crt •* 7 awv r,- ,v^ fc/V • w (Resid-entia^ijVA tlv Other (specify) r;vv?-'C ’ CivJ ifOl ____________LZ.-'i J/ DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ ^^joci pjol ’iU»<iJP Describe request in detail; -tr/nn 6o il\~^tcZtAt^ 1^1 s:ide.'g ’^ ---------------jbcol /iFdir IntKxs^ Uie s^icf^ ---------rrzT VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other _ Lot Width Front Hardcover Side 1 HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning requlations "tot*--ry-on ^‘Slir.rt^ . DESCRIPTION OP DNDSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning. Code Requirements; <<!! liaufA ^'Konf. rfr/ 4^' 4^rr-fT 4W /rivi-l CorS^jilt.'rA^ ^f>c] uretdA^if. Too\ :n)cU1<;1 n^:i ngijriTm'^ ViVi^l *2. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. .8. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A NORRING COPY (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included, Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete Initialed by Clerical Staff_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. yApplicant's Signature ^ Z j / i Date Vcir. /99c__ IBRS SIGNATURE J ^ The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of J:his request. ■>» Owner' s Signature -ZZ Date /C / 9 9C Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. J, IH. f RUN DAU ! )■ -Vi. • . iSe Z0-117-2S SI 00S8 f ; ,11 ' Vi t ~ OOIMT RO ^ f HEMCB'IN county property inforhation system PROPERTY ONNERS LIST >< PROP ADDR ‘^. 02990 CASCO POINT RO ■ 'i < 0»t«£R NAHE ' TAXPAYER !i D I J NORRIS BRADLEY C BAKKE i NAHE/AOOR 1, 2990 CASCO POINT Ro'. i' ‘ » •<’ 'I 'i t , ;;;^HAYZATA m . ss39i •;: [ • ' A, ■ :jr.;. : • ., ^ • ' ; ■ ■; T 38 20-117-23 31 00^5 02975 CASCO POINT RD STFNART R PERRY STEHART R PERRY 2975 CASCO POINT ROAD ‘ HAY2ATA MN 55391 . f I. 4 • A 20-117-23 SI 00*4:i. , tl PROP AOOR ?■' 02947 • CA-TO POINT RO r ► ' * i ONNER NAME LT< A 0 ROZEBOJH t • t 'i (TAXPAYER '(^iTNEOOORE A DEBORAH ROZEBOQM • NAME/ADDR i^2967 CASCO PT RO . ,j . , -- -- - - .- - - - - 3» 4 f •4 ♦ f I i HAYZATA MN 'SS391 •» f li i ■ • i n I ■ --r 4 ' * ■■ ■ , ~ so 20-117-2S S9 0020 PROP AOOR ' 0S020 CASCO POINT RO .ONNER NAME ;JOSEPH E.BRAUN ET AL • TAXPAYER » CAROL J KELLY [) •: NAME/AOOR S020 CASCO POINT RD ^ ‘ .i t HAYZATA m 4 55S91. ■A* - 4 . . . 1 . . /, ifc rl > .f 38 20-117-23 3r 0070 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED JAMES R A CATHERINE HARTZELL JAMES R S CATHERINE HARTZELL 127 NOOOLAHN AVE ST PAUL MN 55105 I - ' .if ..! . / ■fi Hil •A f t,i I« I ‘i V 001 00009 ;i'j i;’ ‘ 'll ' i' I » ; d'f .'"i? v' £•*• -;V : I:?: f t TAXPAYER , TOTAL BATCH V T- NAME/AOOR V . u L : i • r> .1! . .’i, , 4^ 38 20-117-23 34 0023 02987 CASCO POINT RD JAMES R A CATHERINE HARTZELL JAMES R A CATHERINE HARTZELL « 127 NOOOLANN AVE ST PAUL MN 55105 ‘ \ I 4 v'l:■« • 1 J or MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE f ‘ I . REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 1 38 20-117-23 31 0061 02980 CASCO POINT RO C H HAACK 4 P MULLEN NAACK C N HAACK A P MULLEN HAACK 2980 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA MN 55391 ‘ .. •• f i t )• •h» 1 I 38 20-117-23 34 0003 03015 CASCO POINT RD R G LAURIE ETAL R G LAURIE 3015 CASCO PT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 4 'I ^ ‘t •» •» * V«1 38 20-117-23 34 0024 03005 CASCO POINT RO JAMES R A CATHERINE HARTZELL JAMES R A CATHERINE HARTZELL 127 NOODLAIM AVE ST PAUL MN 55105 .■) i i'.•V > ■ U (5 •’ • I ■t ♦ « < i* • * I • ;• r ; ,1 '• tL .) .9 I . I I . i ti • « ; ' • . 4 j* • < 5# - I 4 ^ r I \ ■■n•1 t 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE ANO TRUE ' REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST ■ « »• 41 UxL^i •I* r :r ‘•I *.4, • .1 • • f' ■•« 3’.: V i 1 . !’ ; »} ‘j;’W I* * •i •’H .1 >. f- • f .‘Ir .,1 9 j.: » 5- ■ ipr; J ui- 'f* •i :< ii•f.*l « - 4 » , J ^ ^ V 4 1 , 4 ‘ t » I ^ I ♦ .A*f 1 t *i I . . . I • > . f 1 I ■, r* •! 5 1 * 4. * . I I • ■i : T TO'•ffX Perry , Perry & Perry A ttorneys at Law Stewart It Perry Shaw ?4 M. Perry Shane C. Perry Norwest Bank Bitlding 900 East Wayzata Blvd ., Sitte IIO Wayzata , Minnesota 55391 Telephone : (612) 473*0130 FAX: (612)473-0184 uit September 22, 1990 Mr. Jim Hartzell 2987 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 JJ.’ .N .7 • ik % \ \O' Dear Jim; You explained to me that the City requires a letter from your abutting neighbors giving permission to build a swimming pool off of your back deck. I understand that the pool will extend beyond the line of my house towards the lake and that is why the letter is necessary. You stated it was to be a ground level pool. You have my permission to proceed as you wish. You may use this lett-^r in any way as you see fit. If this is not sufficient, please let me know. I will certainly cooperate in anvr'vav I can. Si: ttfWart Perl^ t, i«usi iiHifA / V^’ i ' •• ^«v. .. |f.,;f *' > ^x<sr/A><» i 75-'^St? ■•■■<.•/■'•■ O J. r- .•••f•r L iff- 'To\'J tlj ‘i. •/ • P(^oPOiet^ i 1..L' . F \ HARDCOVER CALCULATION HORKSfiEE SETBACK 20N6: (ctscLE otis) 0-75.^ 75-2E()'j 25.0 aSGO' EGO-IGOO' t-J •-• r E xisting Hardcover in Zone VTf •i I * • *1-1. • • A. Hniis? ■ X .s - - .. S.F. LENGTH WIDTH X 3 S.F. ^-^10 ^^ S.F. Tov^^’r ^^_.. S.F. X :.F. R. (lARARc X S.F. <*, P rI VPWAY X 1^ S.F. X S . S.F. n. ‘NfnpwAi X X Sir# X _S.F. X S.F. E. P atio/ UECK f y ^ • 1 1 i/ ' S.F. m P.lANnSCAPP X S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN RY . X .S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X . „ S.F. X S.F. R. Othpr *"! X ~7^ S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone Total P roperty A rea in Zone A .-f ' B ....... ^ . S.F. ' 0 1 0 S.F. P X IQQ = :. i >' f « \ '■k B % <1 • (kT . 1'^ r r' ■ m HARDCOVER CA! CULATIOH WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE cne) 0-75' 75-250' ^50-500' Existing Hardcover in Zone ' ^ 5C0-1CG0' A. House '.SNGTH 3. Garage c. Driveway i_ X X D. Sidewalk x E. Patio/ Deck F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN ?UST.C' - SHEETING G. Other WIDTH Total Hardcover in Zone — • • Total Property Area in Zone C:>0 S.F. S • f* • S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 7.0 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 'IlOo S.F. B X 100 21£L% ^ *I n i f l^.J^ A}, &a -Ff ■ /^oo/- Ob ‘f‘^ f(J \^^.L - n SI p ^jJ - 1(oO p y I •<m i V J J 1 -N ‘1 • N P ^ID ^ 57*^7 —:j7?oo - /v-77' « ( ^0 \ J' 1/, dt/1* Y' J /y/^/cDgoveg. *2-^&7 CA‘^<^ f’n yg-c>. 7^' 2.^A«,:3=? £yyj: 7 fMAC:> dci/e«g- .................................. MouL-€Z . .•si', ' 2.«e^... SM?r£i. * /S'Ojf, , _ _ ^re<n/»'i- tv^ ('g ,.40,- /r» •• ?ip. s/. .. .9^0 _. 7?i*/i..-«,. «Aie ^ ......................^O U-jCiM'-:: O ■*•;? ____ s "71Q_ I?(?CK ’ioy/L, _ , /3oc/4J r^ric..2 J'iV ._ .. ■■ yy2,o -r/ft,“22.2* iiC,7 2 -r.'6;,r©2 - 2S.^ /*<oPoSet> /^. SerAAcic ,‘^A»c,cA/3c.t4i^\.«siT r <2 S /__ __Lot Ct>}/SJ*:^^ - /!^^/«rv>j ____ ____________ €*^A-TH0'-'Se‘ 5Mv£i - ___ ‘ 'V .-I,.,i^ ,.''.1|' • p(2x»fccfe'ii /4A ‘tD>6oyf ’-’£-'. . . /• ^/S77/^Gr . ....^20 ........ • » ■ ')■[!■, :poo^_ f^x3C, . .:4*5 V 4.4. . ...• • f CoAiC, f%>ot. fATlO ..................................... . . • • ■n> i 1 (s7 xs-C,y (ty y/cj) -68V jnB ^.i.; ■ 4 •Z3U (f, X. r J1 ^ v.-C.................« • •• •.,»• . : ;.|. .. srnn=» */>v . ! (ty T,-^.i AiiXiTC I^L lKUJt(^/ ,(^y(,„6 J ”/ . •• f. .......-...........BO - / - I ....... ZOZZ-.f i ta.ui^ _ /SO _.^.2'0 o2-■»6.3% i>rC4C. .(^A f^Ti><;.0___^90 .S_____ . i^/o=>pose^ J.____P?ot-.c:«)r-ete2<.4 ‘//'.'/t ...........l •—•5'<s.'^o-af. '/^5:7% i . * • •' ,i; . s/. . -.- >/2-5- 5.C, • « • oMUatti ■Bfliii iritfittttiki KfiM ^r/OL J r/A'/ H/ ^ y y r »• - -Mip^^w ^»* ■ • »<U TV»- - ? Tos Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members Acting City Administrator Gerhardson From:Jeanne Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:August 12, 1991 Subject: #1663 Mark Johnson Preliminary Subdivision 4465 Bayside Road Continuation of Public Hearing Continuation it of Exhibits Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Planning Commission Action Notice of 7/24/91 Sketch of Basement Living Area Weckman Memo of 8/8/91 Septic Plan/Borings/Perk Tests Discussion The subdivision application was tabled at your j>revious meeting pending resolve of the illegal duplex issue and a need for additional septic testing for proposed Lot 1. The existing septic system serving the house on Lot 1/ was found to be failing and leaching directly into the wetland to the south of the structure. 7 lease review Exhibit J. Mr. Weckman is in receipt of additional septic testing for an alternate and a principal site. Review Exhibit K, Weckman advises that the existing system will be altered and closely monitored to determine if the proposed repairs will save the existing system. If the existing system cannot be saved, a mound system will be installed to northeast of the residence. Review Exhibit I, the building staff was asked to sketch a plan of the lower level basement area that was rented by the current owner, Brent Johnson. The inspection staff has confirmed that there is no longer a renter of the lower area. Section 10.28, Subd. 3(a) does not allow a duplex within the Rural Residential zone. The lower level cannot be used for bedroom use as the windows do not meet egress requirements for a sleeping room. The existing improvements can remain as an accessory recreation area use for the current owners. A condition of this approval must include a notice to the public that duplex use of this structure is in violation of the code and a disclaimer that the lower level does not qualify as a legal sleeping room. Issues Yet To Be Addressed By Planning Commission Accessory Structure Planning Commission must make a recommendation concerning oversized accessory structure at 1,648 s.f. located within Lot 2. Zoning File #1663 August 12, 1991 Page 2 of 3 Options: 1.Removal prior to final plat approval 2. Allow structure to remain current code allows only a 1200 structure for a lot 2-3 acres residential construction has not current owner will be responsible for 1 year. (Please note s.f. oversized accessory in area.) If permit for been issued by that time/ for immediate removal. Access to Lot 2 Options: 1. Shared access via driveway serving applicant/owner's property to immediate south. Based on septic locations/ man-made pond within front yard and northern boundary of roperty located on curve create sighting problems/ these indings may dictate that access be shared. 2. New curb cut to be approved by Hennepin County off County Road 84. The County may deny request since a safer access can be provided off existing private drive to south. Drainage Easement over Man-made Pond Staff has reviewed the pond and drainage area. Based on the central location of the pond within Lot 2 and the current drainage pattern, there appears to be no public purpose in its current or future use and no drainage easements be taken over it. Staff Recommendation To approve the two-lot plat subdivision application of Mark Johnson for the property located at 4465 Bayside Road finding that all standards of the RR-IB Zoning Distrcjt and on-site septic codes have been satisfied. This approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Payment of a park fee based on 8% of the current market value of the property in an undeveloped state. This determination shall be made by the assessor. Payment of park fee shall be due upon the filing of the final plat. 2. Outlot A shall be designated as unbuildable and available for combination with adjacent residential properties on north side of County Road 84, 3. Planning Commission recommendation concerning accessory structure. i ^ I/- V 1 Zoning File #1663 August 12» 1991 Page 3 of 3 4. Planning Commission recommendation concerning access. 5. Future owner is placed on notice that existing residence on proposed Lot 1 does not qualify for duplex use per Orono Municipal Code Section 10.28, Subd. 3(a). The finished habitable area in the lower level of the residence does not qualify for sleeping room/bedroom use. '.‘I n- CITY OP ORONO P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1663 55323 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice: 7/24/91 TO:Mark Johnson COPIES TO: Brent & Shiann Johnson 4455 Bayside Road 4465 Bayside Road Maple Plain,MN 55359 Maple Plain, MN 55359 TYPE OF APPLICATION:Preliminary Subdivision DATE OF NEBTIMG: July 15, 1991 NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: VOTE: 7 For 0 Against The Planning Commission voted to table all action on your preliminary subdivision application of a two-lot plat pending resolve of the following: 1. Issue of duplex. Applicant must schedule an inspection by the Building Department to confirm that apartment no longer exists in lower level of residence structure on proposed lot. This inspection must be completed before application can be rescheduled before the Planning Commission. 2. Septic issue. Applicant has been advised of the need for additional septic testing for Lot 1 to confirm adequate and suitable area for both a principal and alternate system. Applicant should also provide a schedule for the installation of a new septic system to serve existing residence on proposed Lot 1. All of the above issues must be resolved by a deadline date of August 6, 1991 if you wish to be rescheduled before the Planning Commission meeting of August 19th. If you are unable to meet the deadline for the August 19th meeting, all information must be received by September 4, 1991 to meet the deadline for the September 16th Planning Commission meeting. Please contact my office if you have any questions concerning the matter discussed above. I J i • L To:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator From:Steve V7eckman/ Septic Inspector Date:August 8, 1991 Subject: Mark Johnson Subdivision, 4455 Bayside Road, Review of Septic System Information A. Proposed Lot 1 The existing house on proposed Lot 1 has a septic system that is failing as noted on the recent inspection. The system consists of one concrete tank of unknown size, two trenches of approximately 75' in length and an overflow tile that outlets into the wetland to the south of this property. Since this lot has a failing septic system, primary and alternate drainfield sites have been identified. These sites will be used in the event that the existing system cannot be repaired satisfactorily. The following repairs will be made to the existing septic system as soon as weather permits. Sections of drainfield tile that have been crushed will be replaced as well as any rock that was displaced during the excavation. The overflow pipe leading from the distribution box will be cemented shut and a section of that pipe approximately 10' away from the distribution box will be removed where the pipe will be plugged again to assure that septic effluent does not use the abandoned pipe as a conduit. Missing baffles from the septic tank will be replaced as well. B. Proposed Lot 2 Soil testing and design have been completed for proposed Lot 2. The results indicate that the lot is suitable for both primary and alternate mound-type drainfield sites adequate to serve a 4-bedroom home. The sites do have sufficient drainfield area for larger than a 4-bedroom home if necessary. These sites may be used at the time a home is built on the lot. cc: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Isv F *' t To;Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson 7. From:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:August 13, 1991 Subject; #1669 John W. Walker, 1310 Spruce Place - Variance Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IB, Single family lakeshore residential, 1 acre, sewered Application - Request for hardcover variances to construct 2- story addition and deck addition Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 & 2 - No hardcover or structure allowed in 0-75' zone, maximum 25% hardcover allowed in 75-250' zone. Variances Requested 1.75-250' hardcover. Existing •= 50.6% Allowed = 25% Proposed » 32% 2.0-75' hardcover. Existing = 18.75% Allowed =0% Proposed ■ 11.4% J^plicant's Stated Hardships See attached sheets submitted by applicant. Exhibit D List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Application Plat Map Property Owners List Applicant's Hardship Statement Existing Site Plan Proposed Site Plan Existing & Proposed Hardcover Calculations Submitted Staff Review of Hardcover Elevation Views Proposed Floor Plans Building Inspector's Chronology '4 Ate m Zoning File #1669 August 13/ 1991 Page 2 Discussion This application has become an after-the-fact request, because the applicant's builder starred the proposed construction without building permits. As soon as this was discovered, the Inspections Department issued a Stop Work Order. Please review the chronology supplied by the Buxlding Inspector. In effect, the applicant's builder contacted staff early in the process, and was advised of the permit requirements as well as the issues with hardcover. The builder then apparently decided that he could ultimately remove enough hardcover to meet City requirements, and proceeded to remove the rpof of the house and construct the second story without a building permit. Staff believes that work occurred for about 2 weeks between the initial contact early in July and the posting of the Stop Work Order on July 30. Between one-third and one-half of the hardcover on the entire property is in rock landscape beds. Except for the 700 s.f. rock bed west of the driveway, which is lined with plastic, all the other rock beds have a non-woven fabric liner. The proposed house addition includes a 95 s.f. "squaring off of the northwest corner of the house where previously there was an uncovered deck. This corner and the rest of the house is intended to have a second story added, the superstructure for this already having been completed as noted above. Because of the hardcover excess, and the change of this corner from a platform to a more intense form of hardcover, a hardcover variance is required. Further, the decks proposed to be rebuilt and added at the north and south ends also comprise a more intense hardcover than now exists. Since a portion of the existing deck extends into the 0-75' zone, applicant has been advised and has agreed to rebuild it totally out of the 0-75' zone. The brick patio and all the landscaping and retaining wails were constructed at some time in the past without any City review. We have no information as to when these improvements occurred. Average setback is not an issue on this property since these additions sit behind the line of the house to the north, and on the south side this property abuts an unimproved street right-of- way. i Zoning File #1669 August 13/ 1991 Page 3 The "proposed" hardcover worksheets were subn.’tted by the builder before the variance request was submitted. Th«. homeowner and builder feel that reducing 75-250' hardcover to 2.'% would mean losing the patio, the deck, and portions of the drivv The applicant would like to expand the decks, and is prepare, d to reduce the driveway if necessary but would prefer to not lose he patio. Hardcover Removal Options Any recommendation considered by Planning Commission should include removal of the 700 s.f. of plastic lined rock beds west of the driveway. Since the Council put on hold its determination whether non-woven fabric is non-hardcover. Planning Commission could also recommend that all other rock beds upon the property have the fabric underliner removed. This leaves 11.4% in the 0- 75' zone if none of the sidewalks, retaining walls, deck, patio or shed are removed. Certainly the patio is the next most expendable area in the 0-75' zone to accomodate further reductions in that zone. In the 75-250' zone, removal of all the landscaping hardcover and addition of the expanded deck and upper story as proposed, results in 32% in the 75-250' zone. Since 1% equals 141 s.f., about 1000 additional s.f. would have to be removed to get to the 25% level. Removal of the 420 s.f. parking area next to the garage would lower it to 29%. Not much more of the driveway could be removed and still leave it functional for backing out. If variances are denied, a building permit could not be issued until hardcover in the 75-250’ zone is reduced to 25% under a reasonable, functional scheme. This may not be possible. Planning Commission may also wish to consider whether, if applicant could reduce the 75-250' zone to 25%, should any portion of the 0-75' hardcover also be removed? The City Council has declared that all "illegal" hardcover in 0-75' zones must be removed. Issues to Consider 1.After-the-fact fee will be automatically charged for the building permit. Is there any justification to not charge an after-the-fact variance application fee? 2.If all plastic'fabric hardcover is removed, is there sufficient hardship to justify a variance for 32% hardcover in 75-250' zone? Zoning F<le #1669 August 13r 1991 Page 4 ^ «Arc there additional areas of excessive hardcover that can reasonably be removed to more closely meet the 25% allowance? 4.Can 0-75' hardcover areas be reduced to compensate for the 75-250' additions? 5.Since existing deck is in poor condition (not treated lumber) and needs replacement, should it be rebuxlt partially in 0-75' zone per existing dimensions and location? Recoamendation Options Planning Commission should consider the following recommendation options; 1.Approval as proposed, remove all plastic/fabric hardcover on entire property. 2.Same, plus removal of portions of existing patio or driveway. 3, Partial approval, with conditions (specify). 4. Denial. 5. 6. Other. Requirement of after-the-fact fee for zoning application (after-the-fact fee will be automatically charged for the building permit). Isv k ^ ■ I |^X|4: . A; OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 13 IQ Spruce cm cf DRom Fif^A^CE OFFICE A W W\/ 1VI Uk.l1 CHECK J 75.00 175.00 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) *7**8 “fe)^g-K /Q Attach legal description to application if not included on 07,lJ,' required survey. APPLICANT Name Zr^ViM IjSfi Phone (home) *4H -y I"! f Phone (work) CMoyjKit^ Address; t3 )0 City; Cpr^hJO OWNER (if different than applicant)II u/ . V Phone (home)M'' KLn « ^ Name^^T^fLk^ 3<l/i / <?^ Phone (work) Address: t£./r»m^ ( £!L, City: ________Zip Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT DSB OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District "Si -Twynliy Present Use of Property /tj Residentialbi^ Other (specify) OBSCRIFTION of request Estimated Construction Cost $ i.ci.j,uesu J.II ueuaj.j. VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Y Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) Other HARDSHXP Describe undue hardship cr practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:_ _ _ description op dnusdal property conditions Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with zoning Code Requirements :_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ __ 2. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). ■ Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll"). Sketches or plans of floor s elevation views (provide 1 copy 8J5"xll"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete_if—the—a]^ve Information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature LO.Date ONNERS SIGNATURE ^ ^ u The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to rhis application and furt authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City -w.ouitants, agents. Commission members, and Council purposes of investiga— tion and verification of v/wiier • s Signatv ^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Coimnission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ^9 3 (iU 19. 9 iril \ (I) •> « un •tf J3Ui • o;) 2^ » V (rj) (72) r-N—fOO ------ «(7t)5 , 69 s: x» - M (70) S — B X « s H» ------ lil s " (69)5 P »ote (nir j;m» •; —W nSip; *C »' f'i) / I ^ I It ' J(8)/(7)/(6)l jiAoo .«. * (H- oAJt 07/25/n ■ BATCH ods ')[ ].v ';: V * ■ ; !■» i ^ * * i HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST ♦ . REPORT NO. PIABS^Ol PAGE 11 ■r- !• ^rr ■}'' « I • « PROP ADDR 0130S' SPRUCE PL < SB 07-117-2S 41 0051 « V y ^ “B. o.l OHNER NAHE 1.. SANDRA L NUNEHAKER ■ -L-l . '-V . • • . » j , ' M • J i . . .• •TAXPAYER 4 ;BRETT A SUSAN LARSON ;If,. j t L NAHE/A00R.U-1S05 SPRUCE PL •' ‘V* •' ^ . V HOUND Ml S5S64 • • .••'.V;- .V|: • ! ' V ‘ » ' I. . . .... A* * -i;5 ‘ ‘ • H : :7 t ' ‘ • ■ , • ' 38 07-117-23 41 0052 01376 NORTH ARM DR HILLIAH E BOWEN WILLIAM E BOWEN 40 PARK LANE MPLS HN 55416 38 07-117-23 41 0078 01295 SPRUCE PL • STATE LAND DEPT ' CITY OF ORONO CONVEYED 2/8/82 ST DEED 161147 , i; U:.,;.’ I: U-V. t: ^ . .• ,38 08-117-23 32 0014 ’ PROP ADDR ' 01280 . SPRUCE PL , . OMCR NAME > P. J A S J SCHUELLER R - / TAXPAYER ;^:PAUL'J A SUSAN J SCHUELLER ; NAME/AODR = 1280 SPRUCE PL • > Y i>* , j. HOUND MN, ; 55364 X.. : 7 ‘ . . . t, v^r • f f • V F-f * ■ * ; • ^ , ' ■ ■ -i4. " ■ ‘';5 4,1 >■ 6 '5!; :i i' 58 08-117-23 32 0015 0X290 SPRUCE PL STATE LAND DEPT JEFFREY E PAGE 6951 1ST AVE S RICHFIELD MN 55<:»23 38 08-117-23 32 0016 01300 SPRUCE PL F L ROACH ASA ROACH FRANK A SHIRLEY ROACH 1300 SPRUCE PLACE HOUND HN 5536<» \ •i'=1*i I * > ».*'• > V • V »• li Vt '•J H* ! >, \ i •; M-J SB 08-117-23 32 4017 ' PROP-AOOR^ 01310 SPRUCE PL '.i > OMCR NAHE r JOHN M HALKER ‘ } TAXPAYER t' JOHN H HALKER NAHE/AODR 4 WW SPRUCE PUCE }' . J ’ ' i- ■ ... , 'SlHOUNO Ml.' 1. 55364 ! < :: * 1 ‘ . ’’ * 'ffT M i 'A: I > :5* 38 08-117-23 32 0018 01318 SPRUCE PL PATRICIA A GROETKEN PATRICIA A GROETKEN 1318 SPPVJCE PLACE MOUND MN 5536% % k- 38 08-117-23 32 0019 01330 CHERRY PL SUSAN M SUMEY SUSAN M SUMEY ' 1330 CHERRY PL 05 I r 9 V i I -‘J . 7 . A■.. I' ^ i •; ■ i . j; J. '• • 38 08-117-23 32 0020 - 2*5 V. . 01330 ‘CHERRY PL *PROP ADDR r ■hOMCR NAME . . SUSAN H SUMEY J TAXPAYER *•' . NAME/AOOR f 1330 CHERRY PL SUSAN M.SUMEY > • I / ‘‘M ■ ■ I : ■ 9. .’I 9 * ,-r‘ t*.' t .V * A , . t ii 38 08-117-23 32 002^ 01375 CHERRY PL DAVID CHADHICK LT AL SCOTT R A ELIZABETH 8 INGRAM 1375 CHERRY PL MOUND MN 5536^ t y . ^$ • k /r Vf * t» f» '• »4 * • • •1/J• • f • 4 1 • V ' p 1 i • ■ •' • 4 • 6' 1 ><^;; • 8 •• * • 1 , 4 4 1 4 1 *V* 4 ‘>4 t . 9 05 r ♦ \ i,. f • I tL • ' ! i. ■ 1 '■Ti / •\ J > . ♦ TOTAL BATCH V 005 00011 i ■ t r !l ;■ . • • 1 ^ I • • -1 f% I » I • f * • • • •r ■» f ^ 1'. a. ** -J *i‘• 'ti • 1 .' • -M 'i' .* •M ■ ‘ ' )i-A*r 1 CERTIFY THAT ”i*HE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE ' REPRESENTATION MF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TACTION, TO THE BEST «: ;|; j ‘ ; 'fi. f f i « t ; I t :l OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF DATE ‘ 'Ii ■ • if • «-. •«> A4 . I •• i •' ^ *•' . ' v: M % M ;i!’ji- ■ ■|iv" ■ i'! i'l:! ■ 4 1:'r ■ '■' rk i •«* V: 4 ■ ;'-f •' ■ I i .r ! ' ./•5 f ... 1 I 4 • S A 4 f . 1 « !( * $ • * • • 4 , • «. L" i- ■i Ml 't ‘ I Oik I i I " . Mill iinHiniriiilrilrii r mV V/-. - J* r-' •« t - •• :=^ 7'^V EP^^2J^ ' . # j i .4f t . • V V_ \:hi • • Addendum to land use application: John W. Walker, 1310 Spruce Place, Mound, MN 55364-9628 Hardship Unusual Property Conditions- This property consists of two platted lots which have been combined to create a single homesite. The lot is high bluff property abutting North Arm. The topography is steep slope down to the lake combined with gradual slope away from the lake. The property owner found that the bluff migrates toward the lake, evidenced by sur.’ace cracks in the sod. A number of retaining walls had previously been installed to halt surface migration. Removal of such landscaping devices, while reducing hardcover, would increase the rate of migration, erosion, and eventually, increase the surface water flow. The second issue is the saving of numerous 70-80 foot oak trees on the site which provide heavy shade and retard grass and vegetation growth which increases surface water erosion. The use of small size landscaping rock to cover bare areas under the oaks is designed to retard soil erosion. The third issue is the configuration of the combined lots in a modified wedge shape which constrains the location, shape and form of all improvements. Sidewalks, landscaping rock, patio brick and other landscape elements are designed to carry surface water to sump or low areas or create sump areas while retarding erosion The property abuts a 50 foot city street right-of-way (Grant Street for approximately 150 feet, which is not improved and ) W.I •f -J t?T7 provides a sump area for surface water for the property and the neighborhood. The property owner has installed a catchment system for all roof top surface water drainage. This catchment system connects all downspouts to a six inch diameter perforated tubing. The tubing is looped down several feet below the surface and then rises, creating a storage basin from which surface water migrates into and is absorbed by the soil in much the same way as a drainfield absorbs sewer effluent. There is presently installed on the property approximately 250-300 feet of six inch perforated tubing, creating a storage basin for a substantial portion of roof top drainage. The property owner will remove landscaping cloth and plastic from landscaped areas, as necessary to meet city specifications and reduce hardcover as defined by the ordinance. r-' / / r^- !0" &'* - * ^X/5r/AJ6 0-*5S- HARDCOVER CALCULATIQIT^ORKSHEET ET3ACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE^ 0-757 75-250' IxisTiMG Hardcover in Zone r>G^c^^u L>si»«»€rt2-Ar,e)Kj T" Urr 7+*, T^U.IO H1o.!> zev. 2S0-500' 500-10CQ' £A\,G>'-\ A. H ouse LENGTH /Z.l ■V * \ WIDTH ffO X T v‘i t- V A. •,^-CF/\. -r,A -'-X 3i Garage • • f 1“ Tcj -k- -PAri-s c. Br-f^-eway 'AtVA'I , f-CTAlKIiiNj. » X X /7€ C cpA. V*. ^ '* t n I f ^ ’0. .-S4-&erWrbiv S9 fir/Cf f '^if: ?r/.i ■ "4 -N X /6' V •US E. Hatio/ >SCK X op^ . ■OPC'V-^ F,Landscape ___ AREAS underlain BY PLASTIC" ■------ SHEETING p X X X G. Other Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone /i?/7 y^f. o //4 ___'sTfT) _ , rh 3S '3 80 'JO 2/0 = O^o) /J/7 J025 M / Y S.F. (-/'V-i XX ^ ' ' . <7^ : 4 #v i S.F. # * V S.F.'Xi3/ Cii/ " _ S.F. . .'is? CS?' > i J 's.F. fS. F') s-p* ^ Y 7t/- /ITf?)iKJI /sTf^ S.F. S.F. X S. F. > ^S.F.^ .'77 V ^ S.F. -S.F. B ■702 5 X 100. ____ S.F. _____ S.F. > • • /s, is A !<='• ^ B If 0^ r,' 9/30 qO^-- ■ q Sk. • *• • . 1 5 . w P<2-OPoSeC^ ^-75 ' HARDCO'/ER Ci.LCULATIGN WORKSHEi: Byu. G-2. STBAc:< ZONE; (ciRCiZ :ne C~Q-~i^w «i> Li w Existing Hardcover in Zone A. House LENGTH B. Garage c. D riveway D.:< . Patio/ -t F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY , . PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other - X WIDTH X iS/up'S _ _ _ X 3 - X Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone >97 /7c/ /o2 3 vfcO s < ^ • a • r t S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. -7 0-2.S S.F.B (5JZ^il_ 4 fTL2^2£_ X100 9.5-4 '■% ■ tl S/Ns.'mi5> /S A'1^7' pA<H- « « f r ' rv V, 1 ! \ *4 I i: k>» 17 * HARDCOVER CALCULATIOH SETBACK zone: (CIRCLE ome) O-JS^T^^ 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone iLONJCOfi-L^<W»fc#TTlOKl 7^--M U3T 7**-8, AlU* g»J .G -3> A.■ House .lo. O X 14.=1 4M ' /4? ' • •LENGTH V/IDTH • 2<-35 X 7_4. C-mi ■■ *i O', t—'0'+- .X 1 o ."I //y r ■• ■ -'y* X • • ?o. 0 - JS • «. • • • • • 2^Z 0(C\L •Xn -r •- ■ Cf %• f vB- « Garage _ . . • • . M ^4.^ X 7.4.3 S9 0 •• » $r* ••. C.Dr l VEV/AY ( r-IX •2ioo' " IC VAV.-^X D.. • •• X .■ /?S ■^Uuc y S’ X //. 5 yy *•\' • ___ X _ 1 E.^ATIO/ 3eck X •— F.Landscape 5o:ir/. >■/ ^"/// / ,X • •• • • /yy o AREAS underlain BY . Scc> Ot in X . • S3 • 7ao - PLASTIC".......... SHEETING ^ - - //r |>/<- X •» ^ - • 7y<p • X ••• G. Other ■ X ■3 ^/? • • Total Hardcover in Total Property Area in Zone Zone /4 MO ■ y S.F, . / S.F. S.F.^ rN S V S.F.y S.F.V S.F. / • y .f.n/ S.F. S.F. S.F.J S.F. S.F. S.F. y S.F. S.F.B 7/55-B __ X 100'So. CO % . V7>7 » .<»•• • • ♦••• f • V Di! • .! m HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET "7^^'ZSO* SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE cne ) Q~75' ^7q-250^ ^ru~;uQ 500-I0C0 E'<isting Hardcover in Zone =A. H ouse 3(.r 2^/S t FI LENGTH B. Garage c. Driveway D.. S idewalk E. Patio / Deck F.Landscape areas UNDERLAIN BY , . PLASTIC SHEETING 6. OthTr^'^^I^_l£. WIDTH S.P. S.F.=tt= S • F* • Si: Total H ardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone • S.F. S.F. = 0 o?t S.F.• • S.F, = ^39 S.F. S f r 1 3 S*r • =. t^o S.F. • s S.F, S.F. • S.F. « 3 S.F. = n S.F. 3926 S.F. S.F. A B H ♦ 3956 i m I I viD X iooX_^JZi2_ ^ ^ # iUfiuvvTTuCs e-t aA»^e-T?.j /<vjbicA-rcfi THev CA<^V 6«=rr |t Dcxc^oTO 2.r ' ,mm- • Hi» 7s-z^o' HjJ^!:> sX'T) 0 -75' . 7^2S- S.-P.'^___ ________ ex/rr/^c* /VC =/^,7-^^.yV^ s^&M'rn’C^, c^i-ea ^A/ST7/JGa //C »■ S'O.Ci, yL PeC. cy}i.cs. P<etoJe^ /fC ^ _____P^iPpst^^ (3^ Bejc. S«^tf r^iTT?rt> ‘y<3<*s/feBT s VJ»7^, s .1. - ______C \Per^\/^.OF SZO £^. .~~7~~~~ _________^^g»*OJe /g^A>»J/AJC. ^Aj,uC fSR ._ 2,*^___________________ " __P.f t>€ c'|c;_ 3 a i :C. ■ ^ ’ __________ ffefg. rnr §’^tlrX»/.^ P,iMfZ ; Cjj&^Sl^^J^Urz^ 4 ?7 c _5 .r __________ - (^_PeTQ,. Sudir-11_tr^ J 3*^2 6. . 1 P . ~ Z7.7 ^ ._ _ C^wre /^Jc<<«Ac« Fn£>r^ 757 t/ TD . .. Tay 3/2. Z-^,^ . .. ey.. /‘Z :Vr. ........... , . —. ........................................... __CfhVO ______ _____ v,^ . ^ __________ C^jrr. u/Ati-i: :n-A^5 ___________Cact/^aVajc, stay '^_______ ____________X f^/Vno_TT^S^Fef^ Sufir/.irTtCk piMJ^Wou^tjC, U.C. Pt^^ci/Acz -yiM s ,-lJL't>c-ot^_:s^r»^s 7 C^ /aj o-^rO . /5i7_- szo,A-(^ e>c>a /AV % fet/</^rAyC3 Z'i;>4AiS ' f^oT^ : /M- P.'?-^ ^ 2«Ajfir _____ ___________i^/AJt^_\AJiTH ^‘^f^ic.. , . r-J^{\AO{/^__ 7<70 v720 +/'220 s.*r, jScCM/Pt^inc^ 7 C^fe Cft* 770^ . Oi/t^ r //Or£^ __A/t?T"= 7/sT-7a?r7io.ri32.o.*''/o.- VSZS’ .zf. ......... -.............................. = 22.0% NCmS’LOF.. 2-7_yo_. i A’DO -i-ZA'-'Ci____ ____u7.u:^4_£l-; sPC- ^ 2<5VS_iiL_4//V*?i_.tv / rH ajom ~ coo\ji?^ __ ..P^<e-(C______________________________ iiMii iK • • • ^ I «?*••• lUiii V/^iO SoiATH VI ^ ^ S(t>^ %- H ' •• • • I ■& ■■ i Ml l> k-^V iiJUifc III I BTii fTi <yfcr i>i 1*^ I III11-^rt iurrnfmTT . I< — /3/0 ____[pfllc-. on psA^^rr «p^- 3'S.. 7-B V' o'-’>^_ r>iict^i? StATV^ __€^. s u!s7»/u I )f<S<L_ fu_.u .7r/51 o>^A (Vf . |p<i' ‘ f ^eoe^ \?|ux*<g. c^a0^c^(c>ia.S .. Srvtce/i&^ ji^ _ >i _d i_.t?4 trio**, 4_?. f<U/i i__.V A 1^(044. C^ „ ^1^ /- lUa^ X u^ karcL^yiJer feJu>0(^-JjSip^ Uit^ed' ^ /f^aJcL \Jt%iriacLc€^ ^ \ J- 'vV - .i*'.eX ':Cr_^6jcXl ______ 7-20. r li / ‘AJ V '1- Oc^ ^ £r'u»»eJ'uf Utt -f e/vu> w . - •• • . ^ ^ - ■ « ' • - ■' *- “ - 4 « • # »Mtm»^ •• • • •At-' - ii^-—•t. %MQp •#• r‘ .<--» • • - ■ . »-—^-- ---- ^A ' «-r "A' f Ji'A^..' *.: tn-% •. V*V ‘'^^r* "<>77 .» ., Y r.\. Vk^ K I'** f To:Planning Conunission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members Acting City Administrator Gerhardson From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building S Zoning Administrator Date:August 15, 1991 Subject:#1671 Bruce Turner, 3800 Wayzata Blvd - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-IB Pertinent Ordinances 1.Section 10.03, Subdivision 5 - Non-conforming uses require conditional use pennies. 2.Section 10.03, Subdivision 5 (A) - A non-conforming use may not be changed to another non-conforming use. Variance required as applicant proposes a plumbing and electrical showroom/sales shop that would replace a legal non- conforming commercial use, vegetable/grocery retail shop. 3.Section 10.03, Subdivision 5 (J) - "Apply to "Uses" only." The non-conforming use provisions of the Zoning Chapter apply only to the use to which land and buildings are put, and do not apply to situations where the location or height of structures, lot size or other factors not involving the use of the premises prevent strict conformance with the requirements of the Zoning Chapter. Where, however, such a situation existed legally under the prior applicable law, the Council will not unreasonably require strict compliance and will generally look with favor on granting of a variance under Section 10.08 of the Municipal Code. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I - Application •1 - Applicant's Addendum - Property Owners List - Plat Map - Staff Letter to Applicant - Floor Plan - Site Plan - Site Plan Approved for Grocery/Retail Use at Time of Acquisition of Additional Right-of-Way for County Road 6 - Floor Plan of Former Retail Use - Suesan Pace-Shapiro Opinion I r > 1A ^iX I jtc^j I" * Zoning File #1671 August 15/ 1991 Page 2 of 4 Review of Application Applicant has applied for a conditional use permit to continue a non-conforming use of the residential zoned property (RR-IB) for a plumbing/electrical store use. The plumbing store will have 3 full-time employees and will operate 5 days a week/ Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Please review Exhibits E and H. The actual retail use area remains at approximately 2400 s.f. of net useable area. Office/ utility/ bathrooms/ etc. have been excluded from the total 3/000 s.f. gross area. As the commercial code for a retail use would require 16 stalls/ staff would suggest that since the delivery vehicle and maintenance equipment will be stored inside the existing storage shed that 15 stalls are adequate. Former users have always used the storage shed for retail storage and the former retail use was approved at a 15 stall level. Based on applicant's comments/ it would appear the plumbing/electrical shop would have less traffic than the former vegetable/grocery shop use. It is staff's understanding that the majority of the clients to this business are contractors and not the general public/ although the general public may use the services. Mr. Turner may be able to provide more information on type of customers and frequency. Review Exhibits F and G. Exhibit G is the approved site plan for the former retail user of the property denoting the area acquired by the County with the upgrade of the intersection of Highways 6 and 12. Staff has sketched in the approximate location of that right-of-way and how it impacts the applicant's proposed parking plan (Exhibit G). Applicant would be best advised to use parking plan designated in Exhibit H. Applicant has not designated location of refuse container and concrete pad for recycling use. There is already a screened dumpster area to the northeast of structure that was approved for an earlier applicant. Signage and lighting needs appear to be minimal. Lighting would be subject to the standards set forth in commercial code and signage subject to standards of residential code. As for landscaping/ applicant proposes major clean-up and regular maintenance/ no plantings. Applicant also proposes a change to the colors of the exterior of the building which/ unfortunately/ the City has no control over but many of us will be happy to see the change. Please review Exhibit A-1/ applicant's description of the commercial operation proposed for the site. Please note Page 3 of the commentary in which applicant compares the proposed use with the former use. Note that the product distribution center will remain at its Maple Plain location. The hours of operation for the proposed commercial use will be trimmed back considerably as former retail use was open 7 days a week and hours of operation would extend into late evening hours. The proposed Zoning File #1671 August 15, 1991 Page 3 of 4 business does not need the high volume customer counts as did the former retail use. If this conditional use permit is approved, as in earlier approvals, the City will require strict controls on any growth, i.e. expansion of structure, expansion of employees, expansions in use. It should be noted that there is no longer any exterior storage planned by the applicant. On all previous retail site plans, the grocery/vegetable store use was approved with a 20' X 25' outside sales area to the east side of the structure which often became a problem with encroachment into the immediately adjacent State right-of-way. I have enclosed an opinion from Suesan Pace-Shapiro dealing with the property located at '*960 Shoieline Drive, Exhibit I, for this review. In that opinion, Shapiro advised the City that if it were to consider variances to non-conforming uses that the Attorney should be advised to proceed with research into Minnesota cases and cases from other jurisdictions to determine how courts have treated the questions of whether or not a variance can be granted to non-conforming use provisions of a Code. The City has yet to be challenged as to the granting of variances to this section although it has done so ir th#* past for 1960 Shoreline Drive, The Dog House on Highway li ap*.i + or rhe subject property. The current Code (Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (J)) would suggest that the City can consider granting variances to these performance standards. It would be staff's recommendation that before the City proceed with any formal action that the City Attorney be directed by the Council to provide an opinion as to the City's leoal right to grant variances to non-conforming use standards. Staff Recommenda' ion Options of Action If Planning Commission finds the application to be in conflict with the RR-IB zoning and that its use would present a hazard to the public health, safety and welfare, members may vote to deny the current application. If it is the opinion of members that there are many positive aspects to this application and that the proposed use would result in a less intensified commercial use of the residential property, members may conceptually approve the •'lication and ask that Council consider these findings and if they concur with the Planning Commission recommendation to direct the City Attorney to provide an opinion that would determine if the City has a right to grant variances to standards set forth for non- Zoning File #1671 .August 15/ 1991 Page 4 of 4 conforming uses of the property. Staff would then reschedule the application before the Planning Commission and applicant would be responsible for providing an amended si^e plan to include the following information; %• 1.Amend site plan to reflect actual lot lines relative to Quit Claim Deed of right-of-way to County and provide eunended parking plan for 15 stalls. 2.Does Planning Commission wish to see a landscape plan with the eunended application? 3.Detail on lighting. Locate existing lighting and proposed lighting on site plan. All proposed lighting must be shielded from adjacent lot lines. 4. Detail on signage and location of signs on site plan. 5. Refuse container/ recycling pad. Suggested Conditions with Conditional Use Permit 1. 2. No exterior storage to be allowed for current user. Product distribution center to remain off-site, is ever planned to be included at this site/ conditional use permit would be required. If it a new 3.The usual disclaimer that the City will approve no expansion in structure and any changes for the interior use are subject to the approval of the City by a new conditional usc' permit. 4.Commercial vehicle and equipment to be stored inside accessory structure. 5.Any changes in hours of operation or number of employees are subject to the approval of the City of Orono. 6,Any additional controls suggested by the Planning Commission. Isv : ■•r CITY OP OF.ONO - GENERAL LAND OSE APPLI PROPERTY LOCATION V*. ) ^ / 1 u Pite Addrt'P' wa'^^ata pnnT.FVAPr). npovr,. vT\tMFc^nTi 5535Q Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 2Q-llt^-23-37n-r)OQQ Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Phone (home) ^7Q-1Q7^ Name BRUCE TURNER Phone (v>ork) 47Q-6351 Address 5159 MAIN STREET city MAPLE PT.ATM Zip SS3S9 I OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name CLIFFORD L. OTTEN Phone 473-5425 Address pq.box249 long t.akf. mm.City T.ONO T,AKF Zip SS3SB Date Property Acquired 4-1-91 {month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PEES - CONDITIONAL OSE PERMITS ~ Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application i CITY OF orm S125.00 Residential accessory Use Flh'AHCE OFFICE 1350200000 $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) 01 QEH ^0.^CHECK • TL 200.00 $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg RECEIFT-JHANK YOU S219400 cool ROl T13: 07/25/9 $250.10 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of laiceshore PRD/PID “ see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS v/$200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning vPUD - refer to fee schedule) Appeals Other - see fee schedule p-IC ’TI CITY OP OPONO - GSSERAL LAND DSB APPLI mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm m m mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mmm mm ^m mm mam mm mm mm mmm mm mm ^m mm PROPERTY LOCATION 'cA, Li /S/ -f, i'i i^.'i • *-*. • •• fits Addres"^ _'~>pr).) way7ata POfTT pyapn. npnvn. VTVMP^nT^ 5515Q Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ?o_i^p-o?-?7n-nnnQ Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Phone (home) 47Q-1Q71 Name BRUCE TURNER Phone (v'ork) 479-6351 Address 5159 MAIN STREET City MAPLE PT,ATN Sip ER7EQ OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name CLIFFORD L. OTTEN Phone 473-5425 Address PO.BOX249 LONG LAKE. MN.City T.ONC T.AKE Zjp Date Property Acquired 4-1 -pi I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. (month/year) PEES - CONDITIONAL DSE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee $ 50.00 For each variance requesc with COP application S125.00 Residential accessory Use $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest Hcuse/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg CITY OF orm FmHCE OFFICE 1350200000 01 OEH 200.00 CHECK ■ 71 200.00 REcnHT-mm you H219400 cool ROl T13: 07/25/9 $250.30 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule r * 0TB R APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision P.ezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Appeals Other - see fee schedule irfanai ‘IS- (- CREATIVE PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL CO 5159 MAIN STREET MAPLE PLAIN, MINNESOTA 55359 August 4, 1991 CITY OF ORONO Jeanne A. Mabusth P.O.Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Jeanne; This letter is written response to your inquiries involving my application ID. no. 29-118-23-34-0009 . The following is a detailed description of the six points that you included in your letter that I received on July 28, 1991 Site Plan; The site plan sent to you shows the existing fifteen parking spaces that are now set up on the property. The property already possesses 15,000 square feet of existing bituminous, with a six inch class no. 5 gravel under base. The parking area has been measured and stripped to assure organized parking. In addition, the property contains a 24'x26' storage facility that will store our delivery vehicle and maintenance equipment that would be necessary for the maintenance of the property. The building, that is 3,000 square feet, will provide us with ample space to eliminate the need for outside storage. A refuse container and a concrete pad for recycling will be added to the northern adjacent side of the main building. Size of Company; Our company has been in existence for 18 months. We grossed sales of approximately $51,000 between Jan.31, 1990 through Jan.30, 1991. We have two employees which include myself and a business partner. Additionally, we employ a state licensed master electrician for consulting work involving new products and code requirements. Our company hoars are currently, 8;00 am. though to 6;00 pm. Monday though Friday. [•H»] ^nix« aw. City of Orono Jeanne Mabusth August 4, 1991 Page 3 of 3 The bonus of my proposal to this community would be the physical improvement of the property. In this particular business, high volume customer counts are not required to make a profit. In the past, many grocery stores and vegetable stands at this location have failed. The failure is due to the low customer counts required to the nature of those businesses. I would reaffirm that our Maple Plain location will be our product distribution center because of it's location and the large facility currently in place. We trust that the above is in order. However, should you have any questions please let us know. Bruce A. Turner Creative Plumbing co. Officer BAT/dt 385-4 r liy nnnni WHT ’<i;'I. ♦ ; ) ■) ) ) RUN DATE 07/11/91 BATCH 007 HEM4EPIN COUtnV PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PROP AODR OItTER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR SB Z9'118-23 32 0006 00038 AOORESS UNASSIGNt'O HErtI COUNTY PK RESERVE 015T HENN COUNTY PK RESERVE OIST » •t • •* PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 58 29-118-25 5^ 0006 05660 SIXTH AVE N PARK GUN CLUB INC PARK GUN CLUB C/0 RUBY GESCMWIND 4959 VERA CRUZ AVE MPLS MN 55429 PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 58 52-118-25 21 0005 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGT^EO S A CIRSPir^KI ETAL CLIFFORD L OTTEM 2265 H NAYZATA BLVD LONG LAKE m 55556 PROP ADDR OHNER NA^£ TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 58 52-118-25 24 0004 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED LISLE VICKERMAN JR ET AL ORCHARD PARK FARM INC 5^80 HATCRTOWN RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55559 Mm, *• * * 58 29-118-25 55 0001 05960 SIXTH AVE N NORTHERN STATES POWER CO NSP - PROPERTY TAX DEPT 414 NICOLLET MALL . MPLS MN 55401 . .. 58 29-118-25 54 0008 05740 NAYZATA BLVD H CLIFFORD L OTTEN CLIFFORD L OTTEN 2265 N NAYZATA BLVD LONG LAKE MN 55556 . 58 52-118-25 22 0002 03825 SIXTH AVE N FFED HOLASEK JR ETAL FRED HOLASEK JR 5625 6TH AVE N LUt4G LAKE MN 55556 TOTAL BATCH 007 00010 • ^ * » REPORT NO. P14S5401‘. I’v -.' K V. - • /. PAGE 17 . '• 38 29-118-23 33 0008 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED BURLINGTON NORTHERN RY BURLINGTON NORTHERN RY 38 29-118-23 3<T 0009 03800 NAYZATA BLVD H B H CURTIS ASA CIRSPINSKI BARBARA CURTIS ^ • 3907 JANET LA BROOKLYN PARK MN 55h30 . *' • I* • • ’• • « f % ■ V.- s V •.. **N > • !• • t •» L ■U . 38 32-118-23 22 0003 03825 SIXTH AVE N FRED HOLASEK JR ETAL FRED HOLASEK JR 3825 6TH AVE N LONG LAI.E MN 55356 Iv ■ ■ rfi' * «*7. i/ *? • | **Jk- -v-t • 4\•- V 4 •; \ • % i \ • • I I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESEfTTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEW4EPIN COUTTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. I • DATE fWut ) *: # •J ■urtali '.1 'J r )r ^- •* r.I. •! : in % -1L0& u (4i no u. a a ^ 671 i .<5) I i I ii imriTinr—itfffTiairnni ^gB~ir ifiii i imuft rm i; -Jf.' ^ .V\ ^ /♦. ; ^ • ' ’ V >N •://V o CITY of ORONO "Ik '"i W Municipal OfRces Post OffJct Box 66 Cosud Ea>, Minnesou 55323-0066 July 26, 1991 Bruce Turner 5159 Main Street Maple Plain, MN 55359 Dear Mr. Turner: This letter is written to confirm the nature of the application you have applied for, as you have noted to the clerical staff that you were not clear as to the type of application you were to submit. The subject property is residential zoned property. There exists on the property a legal non-conforming commercial use for a produce/grocery store use that was to be operated under approved guidelines on a limited basis. The commercial use of the property ceased some time in September of 1990. Your application seeks approval of a new commercial use, a plumbing and electrical retail store, to be operated from the existing building. As I previously noted to you, the commercial use of this property is a non-conforming use. A non-conforming use requires a conditional use permit and because the code specifically does not allow one non-conforming use to change to another non- conforming use, you have also been asked to file a variance application. The fees are as follows: Conditional Use Permit Variance TOTAL FEE $150.00 50.00 $200.00 In that same earlier discussion, I advised you of the difficulty of the City to approve new commercial uses for the residential property. You were advised that it is your responsibility to present your application and that additional supportive written documentation will be necessary. Please note that it is the City staff's responsibility to advise the Planning Commission and Council of the code requirements and the impact of your proposal in relation to pertinent sections of the non- conforming use code sections. TELEPHONE-473-7357 • FAX-473-0510 D j [ • Bruce Turner July 26, 1991 Page 2 of 2 In reviewing your application submittals, you have failed to submit a written addendxim or exhibits responding to the following issues: 1. Site plan. Confirm parking and parking of commercial vehicles associated with operation. How many, where they are to be parked on property, storage of any outside equipment, other changes proposed to exterior of property. 2. Written addendum should include the number of employees, provide data on size of company and operation, hours of opt-ration (any other information that defines scope and/or size of operation). 3. Signage needs. Code limits you to 12 square feet of signage area. If you need greater amount, this should be specified in the application. 4. Lighting needs 5. Proposed landscaping on site. 6. Proposed changes to exterior of building. The thrust of your application should be that your proposed use will be less intense than the legal non-conforming commercial use of a vegetable/grocery store. A site plan and written addendum should be received by this office no later than Tuesday, August 6, 1991. Please contact my office if you have any questions concerning the matters discussed above. Sincerely, Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator JAM/tln it.,,.. 1 tUtt ,v .«■ "tS r- f«w^ ' 1^ ■ ■•y _•!•r:: '' Tffr I :C|< ♦♦ * I- ' -• •.• , V ».-V A-.', j'-r: • • ;i ^ ^ T U i*l HENN. * 1 *-------------- • •/ 00. t!f : <J <o > rr - *Vc# srATf-:A'D ^ « u XVJ M Yc ^ ^VA C ' “i a'l?" ■ /O-' /' ■—/________^-7. ' “ . . /' a; r#.Mv« i> fV ct* r><fr -■] 1 ' nwY.NO. 6 X <Y ■ 4^//' 1 •,» i . / • ^cc^ •* f.’nc ; /x.x r?* " ?e^o Lj. X^V-C-;/ >7 5'"'- V‘-" .1 f r, •/•■ / S yV'/r V \ /!.-»Vs ..»fV / 'VV/7r/^' r.istoj r'«c» rc I c ^ ij-AK) _ k'i! <o.V*Vl« •* tAC>* AVo o'Ay/MrA V'.\ (’>:r-‘r • *0 *y ^ *1 fr i: ;: VI 2^Pr• •« \ . I • f •4 •■•V h r> - • .♦ •• ?!•:*' J >V,i ••• r-v % '4 •f .:*.*? •■.'li'.', J ■‘V ’■ \--‘\11 : r - w‘- *'■;V.| v,r,‘}.-> •j .* - K\ r • * .» y* \ ,.• « ► '•r '*e /Cali'S..;/. f:; > • • , ?i. "li - •, s-. vj r/ ViT} , j, p. '•• • •* I'-^l -ft ^ I) !“-j .'800 (^j.,j l'\'il'I ra • 3 R.3 '' tJ ' * /' ^j -V vS^ Pork,nc, >^Vk.i • »^* t!I, ''i f •/ V V I <—A 'N'io ‘4 //e u ty> <7 ,J: ~ l< • - .--------------— . .- • — i 1 i 1 L\ '.K /j,://j J !1 • ► ♦ - • • —J •• i ^ #w 1 1 1 V|i) 1 I *- -----1 Vrz I C S-P *^l' V c ^ .'^11, ^ i r Pi’/:/Tc'Y O'Vr^'t ^vC‘'—-L.:. • • • -• .. • , }.. IJ 33 1 •■? rvj ■\\' im-'fi i£ ^0 y * /I: HiMS- V. m- m ■ £ ■■ MEMORANDUM TO:Jeanne Mabusth Zoning Administrator FROM:Suesan Pace-Shapiro Assistant City Attorney DATE; RE: March 0, 1990 Preliminary Opinion Concerning the Conditional Use Permit - 1960 Shoreline Drive Our File No. 3643-047 for aYou have asked our office to comment on the regues>. conditional use permit for property located at 1960 Shoreline Drive. The factS/ as we understand them# are set forth below. FACTS On January 1, 1975 the City of Orono ("City") amended its land use regulations and zoning ordinance. The overall intent and purpose of the zoning ordinance is generally set forth in Orono Municipal Code Section 10.01, subd. 2. On November 14, 1978 Ordinance 214 was adopted rezoning the property located at 1960 Shoreline Drive to LR-IA, One-Family Lakeshore Resident-ia District ("LR-IA") from B-1. Orono Municipal Code Section *0.23 defines the permitted, conditional, and accessory uses allowed in an LR-IA District. Orono Municipal Code Section 10.23, subds. 4 and 5. At the time the LR-IA District was adopted, the property at 1960 Shoreline Drive was used to operate a transmission repair business. Prior to being zoned an LR-IA District, a portion of the property at 1960 Shoreline Drive was zoned B-1, Limited Neighborhood Business District. The property has been used as a gasoline station (including light repairs and service) since 1963. The B-1 District provides for gasoline service stations as a conditional use. Since the B-1 District permits gasoline stations as a conditional use and 1960 Shoreline Drive was used for a gasoline service station prior to the rezoning to the continued operation of the gasoline station was permitted as a lawful non-conforming uoe. Orono Municipal Code Section 10.03, suod. 5 provides that: * w Any land or buildings which were actually and legally de/oted to a non-conforming use on January 1, 1975, may be continued in said non-conforming use pursuant to conditional use permit granted as hereinafter specified. ooeration of a lawful non-conforming use o^ land located at 1960 Shoreline Drive ("1978 Conditional Use Permit"). The 1978 Conditional Use Permit was subject to ' a^ well as the general provisions governing conditional use permits provided in Orono Municipal Code Section 10.03, subd. 5, A-J. A question has arisen concerning the reason for, and the effect of a provision in the 1978 Conditional Use Permit which provides: permitted use. (Emphasis added.) I have discussed that provision with Bruce Malkerson of our office who was the City Attorney for Orono at that time He indicates that the intent of the Council then to let the property owner know that a variance may be applied for and considered under appropriate circumstances, to vary the provisions of Code Section 10.3, subd. 5A. v/Orono Municipal Code Section 10.3, subd. 5A pro%'ides that: The non-conforming use may not be changed to another non-conforming use. On June 8, 1987 the City Council Passed Resolution No. 2193, granting a second Conditional Use Permit was subject to various conditions: the conditions requires the applicant to apply for a V a year from the date the Council approved the permit or the permit will expire. Resolution No. 2193 perpetuated the same language of the Code and Section IV, Item in Resolution No. 961 set forth above. HA.«; THE iq«7 CQMDTTTQRAL USE PERMTT EXPIRED? raised: Based upon these facts, the following questions are -2- mm iMi (1,), Has the 1987 Conditional Use Permit expired? (2)May the City grant a new or an amended conditional use permit? It appears that the 1987 Conditional Use expired. Under Item 5/ Conclusions, Order and Resolution No. 2193 provides that: Permit has Conditions, Authorities granted by this conditional use permit run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a penniJ: within one year of the dale of Council approval, or this conditional use permit will expire on that date (June 8, 1988). (Emphasis added.) The property owner may argue that this language can be interpreted two ways: (1)That the applicant must apply building permit within twelve months; or (2) That the applicant must apply for a renewal of the conditional use permit by June 8, 1988. Regardless of the interpretation of the above, the effect appears to be the same. If one adopts the interpretation that the 1987 Conditional Use Permit remained effective since the applicant applied for a building permit, the pending conditional use permit application still requests a change from one non-conforming use to another which may be considered by the City if a variance is applied for and granted to Code Section 10.3, subd. 5A. If the conditional use permit remained in effect, because the applicant secured a building permit prior to June 8, 1988, variance to Section 10.3, subd. 5A should be granted. >fA«; THE iq«7 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BEEN ABAM nTRrOWTTNUED USE Notwithstanding the issue of whether the applicant s conditional use permit has expired or whether the applicant seeKs to change from one non-conforming use to another, and whether a variance to Section 10.3, subd. 5A should be granted, there is one -3- • •• • further consideration: Has the conditional use permit lapsed because the applicant discontinued use or the property for the purpose for which the conditional use permit was granted. Orono Municipal Code Section 10.3, subd. 5E provides: Whenever a lawful non-conforming use of a ^n^conforL^rw'ith^Vht ^ this Zoning Chapter. we understand trom staff that the iDfiO Shoreline Drive has not been used for sailboat sales and 1960 Shoreline uri within the last twelve nautical «'=“J.h“bv ope”t"on of law under the Code, the 1987 SH^of “blen^"a;^‘ndi:^ed^^- th“ ‘.H^ndSr^i^rinr ^iuric?paT^^SdJ c in subd 5E any prospective use of the property must District. If the 1987 Conditional Use Permit has lapsed. the aoDlicant may only use the property for purposes permitted in an LR^IA District. Since retail operations are not permitted in LR-IA D^istrict, the Council should not approve the application. Arguably, a variance to Code Section 10.3, subd. 5E may also be granted, although there is no Minnesota case on point. III..qUMMARY. part: J Minnesota Statute Section 463.357, subd. 6 provides The board of appeals and adjustments or the riearlv under usual circumstances, the City could not nrant a variance to allow this proposed use. However, the City grant a -rant variances to the “non-conforming use sections of the Code and perhaps still not violate stati?ory provision. A prelininary does not reveal any case on point. We have not rifv issue in other jurisdictions which should be done if the Ci y wishes to consider such variances. -4- Notwithstanding the fact that the property located at 1960 Shoreline Drive was entitled to a conditional use permit when the property was rezoned in 1975 from B-1 to LR-IA,^ it appears that several concessions have been made regarding this property. In 1987 the property was granted a second conditional use permit based, in part, because the sailboat sales and nautical shop retail operation (marina) was viewed as less non-conforming than a transmission reoair business. The property has not been used as a marina in more than twelve months and under Section 10.03, subd. 5E of the Code the 1987 Conditional Use Permit has lapsed. Any future use of the property should be for a permitted use in the LR-IA District unless a variance can legally be granted to Section 10.3, subd. 5E. The City Council appears to have three alternatives with regard to the pending application. 1. Thf- Council May Deny the Application The Council may deny the application based on the fact that the property has not been used for a marina within the last twelve months, therefore, the 1987 Conditional Use Permit has lapsed. If the Council finds the 1987 Conditional Use Permit has been, in essence, abandoned, then any future use of the property must be consistent with the zoning ordinance. The Council may deny the permit if it is found that the applicant failed to meet the condition in the 1987 Conditional Use Permit based on failure to secure a -permit" prior to June 8, 1988. Because of the issue relating to what type of permit the applicant was to secure, this is the most difficult argument to make. 2,The* Council Mnv Approve the Conditional—SZSLfi Permit. Since the existing conditional use permit has lapsed, the City may grant a conditional use permit only if a variance is first applied for and granted to Section 10.03, subd. 5E; however, if the Council wants to make sure such a variance can even be granted, then we should first complete our legal research of Minnesota cases and cases from other jurisdictions to see how courts have treated the question of whether or not a variance can be granted to non-conforming use provisions. 3.Alternative Findings if the Conditional USfi Permit/Variance is Denied. As part of any analysis of whether to grant the conditional use permit and variance, the City should determine what the property can be used for in the future if approvals are not granted for this or other commercial use. -5- mmmr 1 staff should show, for example, how the property could- be needed to allow such a residential use, the City Council should consider indicating a willingness to grant the reasonably needed variances, if any, so there remains an economic use of the property. If no economic use of the property would be possible, then a determination must be made if a "taking" of the property has occurred. i . ^ ir;. ^ 3 i: iji mm'-’'.. i •Jjm w ZSPS 72 T ( -6- —I ■'**Li 4P-~* -i .--fV - To;Planning Cominission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members Acting City Administrator Gerhardson From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: August 14, 1991 #1672 Konrad & Kay Marine, 235 Hollander Road Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: PH-IB Requii''^*d Area Existing Area 2 acres 2 acres List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit A-1 Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F-1 Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Application - Applicant's Addendum Property Owners List Plat Map Neighbor's Letter (Higgins/259 Hollander Road) Higgins Acknowledgement Form & P-2 - Survey of Property Photos-Views of Court Location Pictures of Sport Court Description of Request Applicant seeks a street setback variance for an accessory structure that is placed in front of the front line of the principal structure and a side setback variance for the sport court at 1500 s.f. Pertinent Ordinances 1.Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (D) accessory structure at 1500 s.f. Required = 30' Proposed ■ 5' Variance =25' or 83% - Setback for oversized 2.Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) - Detached accessory structure shall be located in front of the front line or the principal structure. Principal structure setback = 75' Accessory structure setback = 62' J^plicant's Hardship Statement Please review Exhibit A-1, applicant's addendum, that notes unique hardships. They are reviewed as follows: 1.The ability to make use of an unused area located between fences of adjacent neighbor and applicant. r » V *1.^^ - -4- .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. y*^»L# - Zoning File #1672 August 14, 1991 Page 2 2.Require removal of fencing which would destroy continuity of neighborhood's pattern of decorative fencing. 3.Written approval of neighbor receiving most impact of sport court. 4. 5. No grading or drainage changes with proposed location. Limited visual impact upon adjacent residence In reviewing this application members may consider the following issues: 1.Review Exhibits F-1 and F~2. Is there other suitable area on the property where the court can be placed meeting all required setbacks? Does the sport court require a north/south alignment? — as with tennis courts. 2.Has the applicant demonstrated sufficient hardship that would permit a 1500 s.f. structure to be placed 5' from lot line and in front of the front line of the principal structure? 3.Does the nature or use of a sport court suggest special consideration when locating permanently on a property? Please contact the Zoning staff if additional information is needed. Isv m CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION .1 Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) #1 . r » & J)... PROPERTY LOCATION I Site Address ^ 1 (g A Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ClTi OF omo FINANCE OFFICE 1350200000 .01 CEH 175,0C CHECK. 71 175.OC RECEIPT-THANK YOU m9440 cool ROl T15: 07/25/ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. • ^ $. APPLICANT Ncune \^nv^g A 00(1 T vt Phone (home) Phone (work) -^4:l( Address: City: mm •• OT •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ** OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)- - - - --- - -- i Name Phone (work) Address:__ City:Zip: .x' Date Property Acquired I (do) (month/year) ((dQ^n^l)also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT OSB OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property (3iA Residential Other (specify) ts^ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $_— in detail: X (e^C)Describe request in \ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) Other <7 c CoXxl lOe LCc^\A to ol(iCC. Cctu"^ 1'“^ . ^ Iw 4uU ayY(t:<'‘Kr4r (Lk.A COffU.UA tiA p'Wiccl tia.oC.4L. CouxT(Uc Ll HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting frprr strict enforcement of zoning regulations; tcr<-iA H a couAT •■''jcj'ifuL-U A c'U'AA'fgw. It.-uxlcjUUfi-U^A.V O'_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements ;-tVe lietu^L ftcUV -UclA ,4c*’s uj — ttut^ -|&w* ’t-txfl, cr<-»i'V._______________ - RETIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. ij . i 3i 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obti'.in this -list from Hennepin County Depa'-tment of Finance A-603 Govt Center '348-3271). Plat Map’ (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8*5’*xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any cha. g*^':' in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 65;'’xll"). Slcetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8J5"xll"'. As an addendum to this applicatioUf please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variamce application is not complete if the_above "^ormabion has not been included. APPLICANT*S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Icnowledge. Applicant's Signature dLLc Date "1 ONHERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acJcowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request Owner's Signature . i I.lI ■ q.LL^_ _ _ _ Date _ _ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Connission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please malce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. r r it'''. /h-( 95.mi e'A o(^ *2 oiaviac^ C.c>tu, vu-V^ S t C» U. #1 14 ’i tujr 4, Oaa.Xoa^ca "t* btct^A u ^ * K” 66' ^a-C^s 4< ‘ -U#^ ^Uvfi. Ut U u«. \0£T(0€£,«^ *Kui.aocuCV o ^ * ,|j2>Uj(U^ W \^A bJ^d. 0^^ ^ toSji. U^^ulcl Wajim um Uv, v^'XdSx &^^CcL dxi^to^. ^ lO* 0t c*^cjc OO0C4JI.A jUZ^Ujuuu AzU^^crtM. ^u\ 4^li ^C^k[ --^U.^ uO^cU oJjlr "tc (!jOu.Vvu'v'Uj \/\^l ^(/\,\^'T Vvooc^ . L0*£- <!?,4_Q- A.^ ^ ^ ^ ^,00) UA "to uo't'H^\{\ 5‘ 15 a.Vw«S tUc.CNUxX Kaxk. tec +tv^ 04a Aj2A 'VWt JiO-'^M ^6.L/| t»4 ^ ^ 6 U-ttr, (••*'' ^KJL\ 'T^ C^uXt lOfruJ.^ u. Mtvje- UacJL lA-AiU^Aait cAA4uLu-a tO^oJlcl. U,o\ Xi^Au-Ci JU2^^.AjUjL OAj^u^ ^ "fe> 0^ ..• K X+ 'Vfvfi. OKtA^Jl ioAojid^ , «L4" (Oouici p-t^AA.oW ,!^jtAM.iCt| (hmJl CiUw,i Wc>pc you lO*«(,( ro.l'C . jU)0»"CL(olL| ()V\ (50A. «A • CaJ^CcA 6isU__ I ./^ 'I . .«-.I/.. T m.,.'. . <;Q’ - i' RUN DATE 07/19/91 BATCH 008 19/91 i .f • ; :' -I .-:■ / HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST f V‘ PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR . 38 25-116-23 43 0013 , 00260 : HOLLANDER RO , L A DIGXLPXN ! LARRY A DARYL GILPIN 260 HOLLANDER ROAD ’ NAYZATA HN 55391 i'-i' ** '4 ' I ^ f 1. ( • : - < SB 25-I1S-2S AS 0027 •'' i • PROP AODR 002B0 . HOLLANDER RO ONNER NAME RICHARD 0 STEVENS . K;xpTAXPAYER! RICHARD 0 STEVENS NAME/AODR 250 HOLLANDER RO •NAYZATA HN 55S91 1 , • • ■; . ► » 4 . ^ }.‘!‘S\ • » »f:.38 25-118-23 44 0015 j ■ 1PROP AODR 00200 HOLLANDER RO .1 y • • ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR EST OF HILDUR P HOLLANDER EST OF HILDUR P HOLLANDER | PO BOX 9405 MPLS m 55440 I • ; ^ I r ’V. PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 36-118-23 12 0014 00795 FERNOALE RO N D R A D J FLATZ DOUGLAS R A DIANE J FLATZ 795 FERNOALE RO N NAYZATA MN 55391 *• * •« *■ ,♦ » . t % i * 4 I « .I I •1 /} *• ‘if,* i‘ I ’ vi;?; t, !:f • t' ■ , ' i. ; t- ■J »t ^4 . J A A ‘ f 4 ♦ • •: I' 4? . I > « ■'i '* •• •v.- .I ••'1-. i ♦-4- , I !\ •i;’ ' • 1 M :! :> i it :•»’ 1 % •; »■' I s| V *;r ! • v/sM'’ •’ .}• »:■ jfV. » nli'< ■/.. Mf 4 V t f ' < 1.JL i- • I r^. 4 ‘ 38 25-1X8-23 43 0017 00259 HOLLANDER RO J C HIGGINS ADC HIGGINS PHH US MORTGAGE CORP 55 HADDON'JELD RD CHERRY HILL NJ 08002 38 25-118-23 44 0007 00225 HOLLANDER RO R E A M P BROHN MARY PAGE DRONN 225 HOLLANDER RD NAYZATA MN 55391 ' 38 36-118-23 11 0012 00785 FERNOALE RO N ALLEGRA N PARKER PAUL L A ALLEGRA N PARKER 785 FERNOALE RO N , . NAYZATA MN 55391 i ♦ . i rt TOTAL BATCH 008 OOOlO 5'• « W - 'if-- i.-fi ■■.*>■■■ J: VfH I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE OF MY KN0NLED6E AND BELIEF. DATE .vQ1(lUc CORDS" S ; B‘:i' BEST.; i f t 1 4 ^ri ■<) 4 y-* ^ m - ; .f-,4 ; ;• , hr ir/i} v- ■ ■' O'; • f1, ^ M-‘(,'i ^ . h: I l! j - V USB k: i S \ ■ July 22, 1991 7 3 n /y ) ".^7 :-: city of Orono Zoning commission / 1 f •</ • , * i >'4 i To Whom It May Concern: RE:Marine Residence 235 Hollander Road Zoning Variance Both my wife and I have reviewed the Marine's plans for a xuulti~purpose sport court on the western part of their property, adjacent to our property line. We encourage the City of Orono to grant the Marines their requested variance. In fact, we support having the sport court adjacent to our property line at zero (0) feet, rather than the requested ten (10) foot variance. Overall, we believe that the sport court will add value to pj^operty, and to the neighborhood. ^ It certainly will promote family and neighborhood athletic activities, which was one of the major attractions of Oronc to our family. Thank you for your kind consideration Very Truly Yours, a y^^a/mes C. Higgiij • •Deborah C. Higgins Property Owners and Residing at: 59 Hollander Road Orono, MN 55391 '..V • . itisat «- . ) i . *■ 'sr Adjacent Property Owners- Actnovledges.ent Porn I (we'■iVr^? Lnelitl ■ ^ <^0- the proccsed improvement or proposed use of the have reviewed the ^la-.s ^o. , referred to as Land Use property located at Q^S ----- also re.e Application No . n ^ ^ +.inr,4. s’r, Avficut'nq this ackHOW 1 edgemeT.t , I (we) amI (we) understand thaw in nroDertv or use (are) not asked I (we) am‘(are) aware of the i:rrove«°ent plaTs and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Zl. !>f/ Property Owner \.ji^ kMJ ************************************** I (we) (print name(s)] of "j?/ [print address] . r, nians for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the have reviewed the J°5^ ^ also referred to as Land Use property located at ^\\c, u (44^, V-c-V_- - Application No . ^ a. ^ a-Haj- in executino this acknowledgement, I (we) amI (we) understand that in execuT:in^ r^T-ori#artv or use (are) aware of tSri:“ove^enT pY/ns tL proposed neighbor's project or use recjulres Council approval* Property Proper If you have My y““L™en'l“'i:o^"thi'Building s M^east 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting dMe. #1672 1 ■. .1 6 - ’nr. U S et\c^ OAof lUfc ^ \^OoWlu^ UO^fliV c*A“ Vbl-»-AA. J± H IP ■ u ) f| U A- r------:,# .f “! r* .<'•"•■>.7/ iL O ■'f 6 Code Wo jLleo<3cttoK c Ia ^uo ^^s looicl-A lac UM-oJi. C't?u-s!^ vO^Vj^ 'o<. 5 _Afto«-c Sr't^c liVVctC'.'^^ ^ mqcxu s <£- tVl .ulu^V r' er 'V *. -.J IVV 5H' V • ^ ** V %i •'/"• V**. ,vV * . • **• ^*V a uX\um ::^ c >u ®*r oa A Icol^luc^ Soc^Hv . Ui^U.c'^ - Mi U4 \\\Aji. . '«V\a<'\ut:'j 0u^\€UCa '/UcxA.t.r\ ''juc;. iVW'^\ E^tU< I I iLit* ^ I • U :l ^r" lA s U.CC. (fj- 0.l<3.r'v .\c's i -Lf u Cc ^okvu<^\i^(P^'V^ o-V (xil^'iu'5 ^6o-Jje Across ^ . UOW*'-'^ occlUua douxTr AC€C*.^ ^ C\ IC' , J24.V ItT^ .* u^ . V jOou -Ic ^ t> tvi C ^ ,^trHA iov ^ ^ ^^ t *t€ ucx ^0^ ^CK.(y<c^. ^9 LooUii-f SooMa . caMcu^ COCuC^ lo'V U C a A . lO^ I* '^«. «V<.C>-WL C&tU.T s' Uw:^<^iu'^ IbV l\iva "to i)0?$j:^0'<- ^t)( * V f(Xi*'; Xdw.C!_*. I i r ! S' f Co iCi* V 'A. 'a ^ Vv r> f '.i£.’i A ^ '•' r r Iv <- r A . / * f*\ - - ic^ir .**•(^•pg ■i rr— ■ ^ * 1 <’iskr . vV ••t^ V Y I i j&I-V--j r r--r^^-gl mi >.7.V < %yK iofe Plac* for Your Children to Pfa^ycAHIIV ■-W ■ .. - b. >./ r^aiiT k^r«t>a eA-r-O^-^-^ *»t^d r V c ^ 5 s \' 1 ; • I . ' S ? - u giu^ *.if ■ • ' m " ‘ r * .* r«_? c iJrr Zj-h»*'i.” "si* 1* ‘ I linear-Round* H^e Enter^inment & Family Fitness V . •] /: iraitr^ / if «-► nai^t.0tLa ttr-r*^ •*<>1 •? .' i ? *" /f/ i3 ■'.’i jLg^The Original Mini>Court" 1;^ k • V-:. s ft -* f< ,. 1^*. ; 4 L ■; :,® •■ ’^3 \ lL-‘ L ./ ILL P / 4 - A/'»count. To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commiss:c n Members Acting City Administrator Gerhardson lO. From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:August 14, 1991 Subject: #1673 Daniel J. Kluth, 2801 Fox Street - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IA, Property located within 500-1000' of lakeshore Area = 113,238 s.f. Allowed Hardcover = 39,633 s.f. or 35% Hardcover is not an issue for this review. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Application Applicant's Addendum Property Owners List Plat Map Site Plan Topographic Map Elevation/Cross Section-Floor Plan Adjacent Property Owners Acknowledgement Forms Photos of Before/After Views Description of Request Applicant proposes the installation of a 24' x 30' detached garage to be located in front of the front line o' the existing principal structure. Upon a site inspection, the stakes for the garage appear to be located behind the front line of the house. This is caused by the angle of the house in relation to front lot line. Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) - Location. Accessory structure located in front of front line of principal structure Street setback: Primary Structure Required = 50' Existing - 116' 6" Proposed accessory structure Proposed = 100' B.Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (F) - Side yard setback required for accessory structures less than 750 s.f. Required « 10' Proposed ■ 52'+ No variance required. Zoning File #1673 August 14, 1991 Page 2 C.Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (B) - Height restrictions. Accessory structure shall not exceed the height of the principal building nor shall it exceed a height of 30'. In reviewing the spec sheet submitted by applicant, the height of the structure cannot be determined. Applicant should provide this information at meeting. It would appear from proposed sketches that structure will not exceed the height of the principal structure and that structure is to be constructed of the same material as principal structure (timberline shingles/brick exterior). Applicant's Hardship Statement 2. Please review Exhibit B. 1. House has been placed to extreme rear of lot. House has been placed at an angle to the front street setback line. To locate garage either behind the street setback line of the house or to the south end of the driveway would require the removal of dense foliage and a mature black walnut tree. Location of garage is shielded by mature vegetation. 3. 4. Isv / '.if m mi A. tnrtii fill I CIW OF OROHO • VARIAWCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee 5175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the^Fact Fees (Double application icc) o cm CF cum FmHCE OFFICE i 7CVr ’>/VV?r ‘)?> PROPERTY LOCATION Sita Address ( m9470 cool ROl m. oim/\ Property Identification Number (P.l.D.) («7 <3-*^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APP]^XCANT Phone (hom'i) ^ ‘ Name I T» _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (wor)c) Address: Foa: St._ _ _ _ _City: CDro^<^ Sip:_ OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (wor)c) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT 08B OF PROPERTY Present Zoning Dictric Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Coat $ affaciy^ci >5 \ecFfs_______Describe request in detail: VAIIXAMCBS REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Setback Variances ( X Front _ _ Hardcover I Side Rear) Other U »7''^ ^ f^m sfrir^bMU)SBIPD«serlbe undue hardship or practical < ^ enforcement of ..toning raguiationsi- SSC8IPTIOH OF OHOSOtt o-,v.nting co,molian=e with ZoningDescribe unusual property condiuio^p-ev nt^nw code °^^»irs.n,Pnts: ------------------------------- XR2D SUBMITTALS cerlwied Km'ZferJ Li»t of ownort Js03 Goft Center this list from Hennepin County Depa^^inent of F-. . '(obtained with property cwnore U i„^i„ae Certificate of survey (signed by a licens y gu«vii" for hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 81. xll ^S^phirUrvey (existing and -8^411”' in easting grad, are proposed (provide one copy au xll ) Sketches or plans of floor t elevation "’i®"® AS an addendum to this application, please attach as P . 4*1"). list of any other persons you wish on. M^Uonal it;m. a^ may be requested by City staff. Please »>« .riics:;:n ^ afdMiMkfclon has not been included. PtlCAIW'S provide ail information required or e applicant hereby agrees to p additional fees (staff guested by 'he fon^g Administrator, P consultant expenses in“ «vi'.t tM^^p^puL^ior and certifies that the information pplied is true and correct to the best of his/her kno g /<'IM Date ■gc. /??/ ackowledge. and Agrees to this »PP,^^ 5:5t*?:--^«rorLV.”rr .“d%oltirmSs^^fo"r%urpose; of investiga- n and verification of this request. * ^ A >• () l\. ___________ Date ri7.;;Tu;;";7ve Miing Commission Meeting. present at all acheduled rd Monday of each month. “ a coi^cil If an applicant is .aating. of tha Planning Commission and have an lie to attend a scheduled meeting/ P^® advise the^Buildina & zoning lorixed agent attend in your place and to advise tne auix of this change prior to the meeting. ■cj Friday, July 26, 1991 Re: Variance Request 'V To City of Orono: .7 f Variance Request We are requesting a variance from the required street setback to build a detached, double-stall garage next to our house. The location we have chosen would place a portion of the garage closer to the road than the front of our house. Since this would violate the required street setback we are asking for this variance. Reasons for the Request We purchased our home ' 2801 Fox Street in Orono on September 28, 1990 from th iginal owner/builder. As shown on the attached survey of our . (see _he attached certified survey dated July 12, 1991), our ho. e is set about as far oack on the lot as possible. The building setback on the back (south side) of our lot is 50 feet and the closest point of the back part of our house is 64.6 feet from the lot line. The house is also placed at an unusual angle to Fox Street making the closest point of the front of the house to the road to be 116.6 feet (see survey). If the proposed garage were to be placed behind the street setback line it would cause undue hardship. The proposed garage must be placed on the existing driveway in the southwest part of the lot. To place the proposed garage behind the street setback line would destroy much of the natural foliage that shields the back of our house from tho adjacent lots (see the photographs of Figures 1-6). To place the garage at the south end of the driveway would require the removal of a large black walnut tree. The proposed location has the minimum impact on the natural vegetation. It would require the removal of some sumac brush and two small elm trees that appear to be dying. With the garage built at the proposed location, the garage will still remain at least 100 feet from Fox Street. As can be seen from the attached photos (see Figures 1 and 2), the summertime foliage around the garage location will shield most of the proposed garage from the road. The foliage along the road already shields most of our house and lot. Our plan is to preserve as much tree and foliage around the proposed garage as possible so that only the brick front is visible from the driveway. i I i u Conclusion The request for a variance for the required street setback is due to hardship is reasonable since the plan presented will cause a minimum impact on the existing trees and foliage. Undue hardship would result to comply with the existing required street setback. Granting of this variance from the required street setback is respectfully requested. Very truly yours, Daniel J. Kluth 2801 Fox Street Orono, MN 55356 449-0959 Date 1. 2. Complated Application Form. Certified Property Owner's List of Owner's Within 350 Feet. (Provided by Hennepin County Department of Finance) 3.Plat map of the area. (Provided by Hennepin County Department of Finance) 4.Certificate of Survey. No hardcover calculations needed since the property is over 1000' feet from the lake. (Survey Dated July 12, 1991) 5.Photocopy of Topographic Survey (Dated April 9, 1985) 6.Construction Plan (Blueprint plan number A91 06 07) (Omitted) Separate list of other persons to be notified. Photographs showing the existing layout of the property. (Figures 1-6) ••• I. RUN DATE BATCH -ly •^IV tTE 07/1 vn I, .••, »<enn •1 ' '. ■ f' !'•. * 'j ■ <’ ', *^' ■ ®«‘ d - - .V • .' «••*} >>*fi * I. ' . . • Xti ■, A&.11T-9T «1 nnniC. >4ENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST PROP AODR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR - * SO: 04-117-ES SI 0006 . . li . 00505 t OLD CRYSTAL OAY RO S iV't ' . PAUL N 0ERG6REN.A NIFE :';;REV PAUL N BERG6REN ;505 OLO CRYSTAL BAY RD LONB LAKE m 55S56 V : i-: ■' • -i . PROP ADDR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER V NAHE/AODR /I •; 1:^'I- . ; • ' r • : •«: ‘ • t . ‘ . • j so' 04-117-2S SI 0011 • 02000 FOX ST • * LESTER E THOMPSON ET AL ^ , LESTER E TWHPSON ; vrI 'I},! 2000 FOX ST ^ > t ; I «. f • RTil BOX S25T., J i;;:Kcse^^ I '«• t •i'V: ’-'r* .i ^',;LaM8 LAKE »tl r- 55S565. {t;' ^ ,1 i- V ii ',S0. 04-117-2S 56 0006 ' U ; . PROP AODR :'.;’02000 FARVXEN LA ! ^ ! OHNER NAME . F KEHP A L NOVOTNEY-KEHP * C •OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR y F KEHP A L NOVOTNEY-KEHP J C JEROME f!kEHP r 2000.FARVXEN U •; LONG LAKE ttt 55556 . r ■ !'5 V?,;;i : ‘ j • -. . ‘t.^CSO' 06-117-25 62 0005 »! 3 t * '• * PROP AOOR 02760 FOX ST ..OHNER NAME ', 0 E DRESSEL ETAL .-.r ■,>1: 'i: .]»* I t i • •* •/■}";m ; */■ .1 TAXPAYER « ORVILLE E DRESSEL . NAME/ADDR':, 2740 PCX ST r . r i , ^ HAYZATA m n 55391 / f 'tf« t 58 09-117-25 51 0008 02920 FOX ST CHERRY C STUBBS CHERRY C STUBBS 2920 FOX ST LONG LAKE HN 55556 38 09-117-25 59 0009 02801 FOX ST D J KLUTH a D J KLUTH DANIEL J a DONNA J KLUTH 2801 FOX ST LONG LAKE m 55556 38 09-117-23 39 0007 02905 FOX ST MARK F ENGEBRETSON ET AL HARK a CAROL ENGEBRETSON 2905 FOX ST LONG LAKE M4 55556 38 09-317-25 92 0006 02760 FOX ST MINNETONKA ALANO GROUP INC MINNETONKA ALANO GROUP 2760 FOX ST HAYZATA MN 55391 PROP ADDR 36 ^ 09-117-23 93 0002 '^.02765 FOX ST OHNER NAHE «kY D ROUX ALE ROUX ^ > < . f ‘ O ’ , - » .T M)2 ‘ ; . fi . . TAXPAYER' .J;*WES D RtJUX, , ''2765 FOX ST E RUWI , * •., r l ^ ■' ' '1 KKMl'- • »■ * r *•. ^55391 i V •. .11 i.-' .. ^.| NAHE/AODR J .V • •;.. . : \ . •. . »* V * * f .,»!i ‘ • ■ ' ■ "V . 'Fi 1 . » ’-i • •. 7 so 06-117-2S 6S 0016 • 02770 RAINEY RO RICHARD K HYSOCKI ETAL RICHARD A APRIL HYSOCKI 2770 RAINEY RO HAYZATA MN 55391 .i* •. J'"* 4 ' * i'l ^ K t'iw ili ' ^ ^ "* /f i' •{ 4 fi-r ' ' • Vvrifif t: • 1; 4 N *• ; / • iJ Ir * •3'22f'.4 ^ ^ • 'V i ‘ • >' » « * f t •>' • I. * • i? • i V' ' 'fw REPORT NO. PI935901 , PAGE 38 09-117-23 51 0010 00565 OLD CRYSTAL DAY RD S BRENT B a CYNTHIA A JOHNSON BRENT B a CYNTHIA A JOHNSON 565 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S LONG LAKE MN 55556 •t- ' '.V . • M , • t 38 09-117-23 39 0005 02820 FARVIEH LA T N HOHARD a C S HOHARD THOMAS N a CHERYL S HOHARD 2820 FAIRVIEH LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 < i 38 09-117-23 92 0009 02720 FOX ST G L ROLLER a C J ROLLER GARY L ROLLER 2720 FOX ST HAYZATA MN 55391 , J } I • 1 ■1 • I^ 1 r"4,. \' I• i • 0 •4 * . < !• : ♦« ’• ..* ’ • •• i. %»» » ; i. 38 09-117-23 92 0023 00590 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S G FUNK a J ROGOSHESKE GEORGE FUNK/JUDY ROGOSHESKE 590 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S ' LONG LAKE MN 553So . i J K 4 4 .V I I • V . I' • ♦ i . t* ! • .‘11’ ♦i i.i TOTAL BATCH W ‘ • r i 0D6 D0D16 1. V ; ' ' :•• • . S' . •1 ■ ’ I" (1* -* !i.' M ' l ‘ ■ •;r r** : V • . t • « > . tr t I< V 1 i ' 1 «• I • 1 9 . >v - :■ )sf ; 4' ;} 'I 'I • » » • * » iV- >• « ♦r • ♦ :f:r -tV' 3 .» u f 44i"K 4 I Ik ^ 3 IV/' -V I- ■ i ‘k i f «># ' \ » . I. • - ■. i 4‘: >: « *1 '{ 0- * ' i .*• % « ■ / I ’ 6 .. •■ f . 4 • I ! RUN DATE 07/19/n MICH OOA .vi «• f .‘i HiMCPXN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OHNERS LIST ■ % i • 4 > ^ t K- .i- if :. A' .. ■■ -i '■ f t'f, ’ifr.'*. . .. i* % ‘i *■» i ■ f J Ai . i«f ♦♦ ' U. • * OTi i'*i i . — I ■ f'I • ft' •*; H'■■ 1 i :! ••' ■ ••!• ■ ■ ■ i. t' A . f fli • / t I» .» f : < * *'?.,•• . • . k' • I. r , I v:;-‘ ii : ’ll I i V ■ L » •* (• ; \i •' ;V 4 .41 ^!:( :• s' I % ■ !i M ■ I?: '; ..'-It "1 ■■ ''■■-' ■ '.I ■ ! ir-^i I 1 .p : kw.; ■ ;•■■■.!: <r i- 1 i‘ •" I *k' 1. ■ ,S ; V' ( j'l' i (• -, ' • 1 ^ -I'i i . i ' • ? ^ •ji'{ ',’it ii^ ii ' r ■ '■ ffV’-i? .»< 1^* t \ •'•m • \ »*’ I ' i *. * * • i*• * 4|i • I . •• ' 'il.' . --!i 4..i|'.!..^lrvc "if-tly ^ .•> » • * • ■•> V.; : { Hi ^ •.til jiri ♦ REPORT NO. PI4S54Q1 PAGE I »' i* % i .f* y !♦:| IS \ 1 •' • * • *; * ■;■' t* 1 1 • \ \*: f 1 % « 4 . '/• * ^ /' •■U ♦ • ♦ •1 : <1 i I I« ' • I . •>.!* »: M % I .• 1 r ; } / ■ t i *• :‘i i 4 'i -i 4‘ •’ 4 • ' i .) r - :^^ I f i .». » I ‘ !•:■" r. . !< . • • i .1 3 »* I ( ^ 'M’iL 4^ M'. (•»( ' jt • Mi *4 fe I • ‘ \ >’l I’M <;• , . r '.'v..•; t i-rr ;i: . ofthek. 1 V - I CERriFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXAT^ON, TO THE BEST KNONLEDGE AND BELIEF DATE i ‘iv^ Vi •kak iii'l'ii: :’!• )• !;'.1 ’’'I*; V »•* I « * f I */“ ' F %i 0 f * i » * ' lit' ' • I I ! “ * ’ If *i ‘r • • . tt j ( k. J, 4 9 i * ; »• » At .1 > » • ^Ji'l -1 i‘ ‘ ti V •i'!,'•■.!« ' '.i 1 '..1. ■ *v i. ' # •‘"‘V .r •r-^- 'n ' » jj r» ‘ * » •Jfi ;*i '?.?..•■ if • • • H ^ -• f i- '-i »'•' » ' } n’- ■ • i-'i.l-'i' }. . i, ^__ ________Moiluu ■ *4 M* (,g) r? • • f .• :. .>/ ;i • • •« *. A. I»:;■ Uiv. % jiw *^ ■ 1 * # * f M fl* « * *. ., II. ' • *» • !•• • ’ ‘ V . • . '1% £ I *••A..............iiLiLi. .* • * f i ** . •! vl •• • t • oD “X) 0 VJ r I hereby certify that this Is a true and correct representa tion of a survey of the bound aries of Lot I, Clock 3, fARVIEW, and the location of all bulldiogs. If any, thereon, and the proposed location of a proposed building. It does not purport to show other Iraprovenicnts or encroachments. ^ COFFIN S G^ONBCRG. INC. Han; STbnrnoerg f!e^71775b Gordon R. *:offln Reg. No. 6064 Engineers 4 Land Surveyors Long lake, Minnesota CERTir ICAU OF SURVEY FOR NUTCRACKER HOMES LOT I . CLOCK 3. FARVIEW IIEflllEPIfl COUNTY, MIMHESOTA ccu/^ry /:cAO /\/r, sy V/ " Ay ey Date : 4-9*85 •- . ao' o : Iror iNo.... : ProTosed elevation : Exiting elevation Datum: 192S, K/j. . i.'0 'I * ' •« I .« > l» 1 w Z. Property Owners' Acknowle ent Form (AUG IPL-i^^s.—!^,g<iL.^. r r*^ ^ #. {print address] CPf^oNo_ _(print name(s)) have revie^-ed -.he referred -.o as hand ’--se property located at O I >~<=^—— Application No. /^73>_« , , , a. «j 4-u,f -1- ^vecu*-'‘ncr this a ckncwledcement, ± (we) amI (we) understand that -n execj-.n^ -& - „-coer^v or use /»ra^ nn^ asked to declare aporoval or disapproval . *• P ~y(are) not asked to g ^ council that I (we) am (are) aware of but inerely \ proposed neighbor's project or usethe improvement plans ana w.Tau -.i'? f r requires Council approval. jEkcME XProperty Owner Date X(P. / 9 ?/ If 7 have reviewed the plans for property located at _ Application No the proposed improvement or proposed use of the &lsc rc5€trrsc t.o as Land Lsc I (V.) understand that in («.) not aakad ty CounVu 4at I (!.“) .» (are) aware of but merely to confirm fo^ -he o-oocsed neighbor's project or usethe improvement plans and that the propcseG ne.gnoo- t> requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have youVco^aentV'to^"the‘Bu7ld*ns a a\"u»Vir;aVi%‘r”;'‘tc th/ scheduled ae.tin, date. wna Ai . •. >,e .OXJ.ft Tmiiiftne. ->“• •—.C /i-w ^ r-«• w /Ul 1 •MJaceot Proparty Owitrr- atrno-l«Ope»nt Por» JprO rAork-. Ero^/'^iTk^ have reviewed rhe plans for r.^e prc^^se- property located at t Fe-x b/rr^J__ Application Mo. /Gn'h. or* pr^opos^c us^ c.^r *. Vne aIs ^€:C wo ss Lsnd Us© I (we) uniSerstand tliat in *>=«'“or uae (are) not,aS)ced Cou-V’1 ehat*: do) am' (ar.) aware of but merely to con-rra proposed neiohbor's project or use the improvement plans and w.aftt tne p p requires Council approval. m» ^ Sae ______ O.OxB'^— •operty Property Owner orror ORONO ggewSi S 19^----- Date I (we)of [print name(s)3 [print address] have reviewed the plans for property located at — Application No -he proposed iaproveaent or proposed use of the .he p-opo W referred to as Land Cse • ^ 4-Ka- h Th execu®-*nc this acknowledcementr I (we) amI (we) unaerstand tha^ m exe ^ of -he property or use .41*) not asked declare-approval ^ DUt merely to ''th.-'^-L prooosed neighbor's project or usethe improvement plans anc tha- -ne p requires Council approval. ( property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any [‘'”bmit v"l*conmlntV to* thi'Bu'llding s J -A .fh ■ • -' r w ; ^ :7x * ^ • w ) • • R4^t:^D ^ Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgcnent Pora I tr.^dliCr/lA'SN. (Cf'iTpC^c f //Cti/v<JP [print name(s}] r—-CT [print addre^ Application No. /(o'l\.> I (we) understand that in executing this ackncwledgeAi^^t, JX \we/ u.juipj. *-« _ _ _ _ _ _^ 1 nf the Drooerty or-^ am (.r.)^or«ked\7"<reTl«T;pV;o;ri’«'7isapprov.l of tho property Wu.o but merely to confirm for the City council y-*; the improvement L'O.C<U^ i i? Property owner Date ClL(- \A^t ^ (ja.10 ^ f I Slsjll Propertyfowner Dare *♦**#****»*•*» «**#** I (we) [print name(s)][print address] have reviewed the plans for property located at -- Application No. the proposed improvement or proposed use of the also referred to as Land Use 1 (we) underst.na that in *=f (ere) net asked tlunc *1 t^^^ «««• tS:rm"4le;enrpV;:s'a “nd'-that tL proposed neighbor’s project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any Information that may ...ist the J*’ °s this Land use Application, please submit your =°"”'y'* Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. -vM : i I ^ 1 ».^ ^t'mmut '/ .;'ffv>Tl .,; •. .V V-/ ' : TJ :: m ■'■ » • :h. : :nmm r" • JO. V' —A.^ **" FIGURE 1: BEFORE /;-x^ 5 ? ' ••? >>.T--o . c.,'-:r;> /sT ?■•' • *< ♦ . «/sT •■•■ ,t< ' „ J^- it w. '•ft c^:. ' ^- •••'*•• .i- • -■ .'A . Tf , "T ^ j T**'^ ■ ^ ^ T • . vv*^ '■• -m -V^-V' 0 A *-"• Js,r » .V ^ -*'/- . -✓ •• ... > 'I F#tK..« i.-*'mmmms FIGURE 2: AFTER I a =1 1 $ * V . X• ■“ » . *.*•“ \: ’• *m.mm ♦ -r :rj t ;^-Ti.. • ''.nr'.,‘5B K- ' • ■ V. • - - C .'4^. . . rr^ * ■^*•"'*1 •-* •''' "■ . . »*W * • *.' * - •* • r A; -t -♦^ • ^ - t Vi-': • »■' ■'' 0^...:.:'Vrfcu ---- ' i «^* ■• • '• -« m m> ^ ~V -*^ |—r* V F- •. *' ar.. _'^- •' ^ -r. y\r; %* • %-W,»jf0 »..4 «#»,• •• S- ■■■••/>-;-'•:- X ,, *>-• -..-vr :;rAr:v«--?/-:V'vc---^'Ar'-?V'?;vA1. •■>-}^s^Ji»tc::^2ffsfarjtitmm : ii‘-.-. . :• 3S^- ■..■ '.‘!.'y'.;'.;^/'*'y'.i-’-: *f.'''.T.'-iy.Vi'- •# : V"' '-K '• aT. FIGURE 3: BEFORE •% •^*'___4*’. V fSi •f •'rf!♦ * 1^: r /-I '-< ,» x’," ^■** .. » ,<» . ^ « FIGURE 4: AFTER 6« ,y • •-■ ^ ■:’gs^^^..:-’i% ‘}.y>^^ir-!^ &.V. *^' ...I ^ •*>- : >• ••' irr's-?#I *K^ -if’*' / - ,V r, ' -VVV. V* '•» A»« 'J.V t.» t .4 ,»- . •■« Vfcsrrr** ' ’^:>^ ' V' ^-;^v ■ fevCT.'^C <^('^ FIGURE 5: BEFORE - «^a V. ■ • ^''f^ %:; I f * V V ^ ^ V -1 '•V • • '■ V T^.'»fA'-‘ J>~ ; . . -^- ^ ^ ' Jf n' *» t T •-/' •> • < • <AIv_/ .- 'r ; ^ P^*'*•?5s - ’ V. . ^A» '4>r ■ . ■: • >.''' * m FIGURE 6: AFTER £■' <.-0^c J t. t rr-^ if*m I ■;- Planning Commission Chairman Kelly Planning Commission Members John R. Gerhardson, Acting City Administrator From: Michael P. Gaffronr Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator Dates August 7, 1991 Subject: #1674 Thomas & Alice Stuck, 4365 North Shore Drive Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IB, single family lakeshore residential, 1 acre, sewered Description o£ Request *- Applicants are proposing to construct a two-story addition plus decks, on the lakeshore side of the existing residence. Requires hardcover, side setback and lot coverage variances. Pertinent Ordin2Uices - A. Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) - Side setback: Required = 10' Proposed = 6.5' B.Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover, 250-500': Allowed (including 75-250' credit) = 3,908 s.f. Proposed = 5,668 s.f. Net Excess Hardcover = 1,760 s.f. Hardcover Percentages: 0-75' = 0% existing and proposed 75-250' * 0% existing and proposed 250-500' “ 66.2% existing, 68.4% proposed C. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Lot coverage: Existing * 12.4% Proposed = 16.5% Applicants' Statement of Hardshlp/Onusual Property Conditions - 1. The existing house and hardcover areas are already over the limit which the City allows. 2.The shape of our lot is long and narrow, with existing house close to the street. The land narrows to 32' in the 75-250' zone with sloping land and we are unable to build in that area. 3. 4. The side of our house is 6' from one of the adjacent lots. Neighboring houses on both adjacent lots are relatively near the lake, existing house is near the street. Existing hardcover and structures make it difficult to build in any other location. // iiifciilr 1 j r Zoning File #1674 August 7, 1991 Page 2 of 3 List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Letter of Request C - Neighboring Property Owners Acknowledgements D - Plat Map E - Property Owners List F - Survey, 1"»50' G - Survey/Site Plan, 1"=20' H - Perspective View of Existing House and Addition I - First Floor Addition Plan J “ Second Floor Addition Plan K - Staff Review of Hardcover Calculations L •* Applicants' Hardcover Sketch M - Applicants' Hardcover Calculations Discassion -* The existing house is 6.5' from the side lot line and an existing porch encroaches into the platted County Road 19 right- of-way. The lot is 65' wide at the road, and narrows to 32.5' wide for two-thirds of the lot depth. An single driveway serves this property and the adjacent property to the east. Virtually all the hardcover on the property is concentrated in the 250-500' zone. A 12'x26' first floor level deck and 6'x26' second floor deck are proposed to be attached to the 24'x26' addition, and will also be 6,5' from the side lot line. Pertinent Issues - 1.Reviewing the hardcover site plan. Exhibit M, is there any landscape-type hardcover that can be removed to reduce the 1,760 s.f. hardcover excess? 2.Is there any possibility that the proposed additions can be offset by 3.5' or more to eliminate the need for a side setback variance? 3.Does the lot size of 0.38 acre justify granting a lot coverage variance? 4.Are there sufficient hardships shown to justify granting of the variances as requested? Zoning File #1674 August 1, 1991 Page 3 of 3 Options for Reconmendation ~ 1, Approval as submitted. 2. Partial approval^ specify limitations. Pass on to Council^ or table for review of revised plan. 3. Denial. 4. Other. i m VL . . _ • -y* . ■im 4.' *5 —---------afiiisa r ClT!f OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION gw. A Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) fx •-/V J. CIVf OF DfiQNO FItXE OFFICE 1 jrfVyflft/SAA PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ^3L5 Skol^^.DR. 01 OEf^ 175.00 CHECK. Tl. 175.00 RECEIFT-THAKK tuJ H219490 cool ROl 709:E07/26/9 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ^ -— Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name ^ R{t'c«. — y?om ShoK^ 00. City; Ql^orio --------- Zip; Phone (home) V 7«? ~ ^ ^ _ _ Phone (wor)c) owner (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Phone (home)h Phone (worlc) Address;City;Zip; Date Property Acquired Clu^ - /? 90 (month/year) I (do) (do no^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY ^ Present Zoning District rC " / <5 Present Use of Property family—hen*-.d^^sidential y Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost OfPlav. Describe request in detail; VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) Other HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning reaulations: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP UNOSDAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2, 3. 4. REQOIRED SUBMITTALS 1, Completed Application Form v.Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Gcvt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8J5"xll'* for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8J;"xll"). Sketches or plans of floor s elevation views (provide 1 copy 8*s"xll'’). As an addendum to this applicationr please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. ^ The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the /above Infomation has not been included. ^ 5. 6. 7. 8. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants. agents. Commission members, and Coa,’.».il members for purposes of in^estiga- tion and verification of/ this reque^ 1?,Owner's Signature moers ror purpo: Date 'P-JT-9/ Applicant must have all submit^.*Is into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting.ii .anning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month, ■ ’cants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planni}-g C—maission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 4 r c^/ tt ■■ Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgeaent Form twe])2^ji^ " A. U^trJetv of ^or-ejl^n: [print name(s)][print address] A 4-Ho r'ia»'s *or the proccsed inorovement or proposed use or the have reviewed the pla*.s .o . P referred to as Land Use property located at UR., — Application No 4.,^^ 4-v,at- in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am <are) \ot ”«K^1«“decla«^ appro" X or disapproval of the property or use (are) not asJcea to aeox Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the iM^rovement pl/n"s and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. operty Owner Dat6 / *5^- Prope ^ Date *************************************** _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _(we) (print name(s)] of 4:s 4MoA-ri-v [print address] A +.ho nlans for the proDOsed improvement or proposed use of have reviewed the -iso referred to as Land Use property located at V 5 6,^ —4/in^fI fln - Application No I (we) understand that in executing this ertVlr’ule (are) CouncTl'’that I (we) am (are) aware of thri:rr-erenr/l “n"s^°nd1hat tL proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Prop€rty Owner Dat'e Property Owner Date If you have your*«mmlnlls'’l:o^ th\‘‘Bu”llilg°* ™*Offl« a^least 10 dais prior to the scheduled meeting date. r \ . s K |v.A 4'. .4f .f *1 ♦ •. » . . RUN DAT!i., . >BATCHI oo*,;;v i j-;. rr COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OFMERS LIST I. '. . '• S : -’i .. -r- ’ I ■ *• .’■■, • i • . r H 58 07-117-21 42 0024 I f r « ,PROP AOOR. |>T 043S0 NORTH SHORE OR f* . {•> .ii i i. , QMCR NAME ^ 0.« H STRELON - TAXPAYER ' fi' DOUGLAS I MARLENE STRELOH i'«.1 • j •• Ft NAME/ADDR ^ 4530 NO SHORE OR » A > < MOUND MN . I 55344 P i • '-.'V i ^ ?'<:: f-* .. „v . j,.,. '4 ^ I ^ ■I ’ . •J}* 1 38 07-117-23 42 0039 04340 NORTH SHORE OR NARVIN E SEIBOLD TOD H SEIBOLD 4340 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 Sa 07-117-23 43 0016 PROP AODR K 04395 NORTH SNORE DR .I < OMCR NAME ? ' K 0 HARDEN A R A HARDEN TAXPAYER h KENT 0 HARDEN i'. 38 07-117-23 43 0019 04365 NORTH -^RE DR T E A A M STUC . THOMAS E A ALICE M STUCK 4365 NORTH SHORE OR i MOUND MN 55364 I- f rt • V“ f -T'• f •i.« I A r i • ’ . . ' I;*' ji| IfV'fl ‘i.'T. 1 i'j ■ ■;/;rj I* i • i r-'2 i *'* * ■’ r‘ -v' '< ♦ f ' • » » * : A *■ t , lU REPORT NO. PI435401 i PAGE 12 38 07-117-23 42 0040 04380 NORTH SHORE OR HILLIAM T SCHOENING NILLIAM T SCHOENING 4380 NORTH SHORE OR MOUND MN 55364 • I*i !♦ I f :* « I t Si ' 38 07-117-23 43 0020 04345 NORTH SHORE DR N R A L BENSON. JOHN M BAUER 4345 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 • f I *# • * i i • k \ ;)* ’ 'u.■rrl ♦L- I * V . :■» ‘=tl= •1 ♦ i \l s . ‘ * t I k. % I. I ;i i • - • • * II I' . I't ^ ♦ •» i t I 4 I i III" s u f . xB« • .li' fl » f f'I DATE PARTMENT OF PROPERTY TA)aTION, Tt Tfavlwi .y'^emlw ■. S'l , t* !#• L \ u:> ► .! i •• -•j!"'.'‘4 -iy ■ ; . CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TA)aTION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF.. A • I *.A‘' : ’ : f ' • . »• . p ' ••• >! \t J. at iv.J- j,,. ir-' ■ i:il •/ * ts-.siHT’S'r ' if ^ > § jt A J ^ 1 * i * J it I I ' I ^ . “I §•jfl'i';; 11]':l f' 'iff ii 'fl!i -•■. ■,i;:, ■ i -I ; >■ 1 I 11V H ; . ^ • A . 1 * • 4 i \ ^'i' I ) It ' I 1 •i w i ■ f : y Jr; ‘r ■ I i‘: 1 t »i t i- :i JJ'i i| <f •’'M •' • 4 .tf 1 . r • X < • NO VO -Sire Pi.AAj /I. H, 9B.OO ±l <*iUc mr .1. . HCJyji’3 rf^^S' C' r:V; ['j // e:.:--!s.j «1 *• ••.*« cPf /f J O ^ O O J u J v^ >./ •-/ ->> • ’ > ■•/ • ••- -.a. »>«a* *•I • *. . • • • ^ - *'- ■- i- -i -x -_________ ‘-•'■a ,-v:. ^'; i 4 •‘.-r -V . . ■ t *• i Tf y i' I 1LL-j \‘:{ : I ; » S' • • • • t •• • « • . . • ■ ..•••- ■ y'r • ♦ • /lyOQ/l / W i r I \ -,n_- '1 I i '> 3 t . N »•' ' \ •. ■) L i ;l Ik I _I • ir--) • n'l .j m jJ,-0 ^6‘>. 1----- -/ , ** i- l¥'0"-^'■T ^U>. -------------^ --*" - • '>'iC I 1^ . •. • • •., ^ (fcy//. /<- 1 ^ ^ />^OfZ.r-A ......>s A Ai^je^ 0-i<\.- ^Z'S ?-is - zv^s. ri-. j Ajo H/^Lt^\!e^. r'4^'A ^ 5Z.:;:5 >^ / , ZZ* - /yZZ- H-.4Aj>c:>i/^ Cigtf^rT- •=- S6s>3S StV. j HM^cc^tr/^ [ ,3' /4t^A. . 25T>- (^2.S 0^"^ >'2z.’7S^ “SzaS" s^. - SLLp^ Ocr-cAoOT^ki:^f=e-*T^ F. 0<C cs5 Z'=^os r JT.-C. SzB sz-a /. Z % /U4r7- /A/ 2'OAJ^ At^rtrS. CAet>.}T ^30 /^ ^ //yCAb c o i/t'>#a- »' ................ /VZ2.^Ci'^c^xr ^foSjL, s^. jZoT Cc?VfiriUrCrf'2>U(t^t> f f^C^ l “ ."/i# ^5 Z^.s«r;.WB... 5./.. .J!).___________________________ S Abt>\T7oM;(^2<^ jf A -7<y- SHct. ___fit£)^n:_pb'®'iHJ __Z^&__5^. . st£j^^ ■ i^ys r/-. py6'£Sw,>eg^. i 3>'2- s i —<aP- 2,7 If - /^. . . * • -tlirv :\»- * * f * . • • t CU0^^. ■•. :* . ‘ l t/dj.^q I .. / /.g] i iKocKf @ f^enf tloc(^ \ ». • ' /y ‘ ;”r -C? Afr/^y. 3jJ^3.oo ^I2o^ - Tiiqh^-^' c^ HC 5_A H a/o. n, '7/d^ 50 per i)oc- Aj j. /OSdfSZ ’/ f / / V — ^ w w-v—1 ^4 1 t; ^rm¥9 f <j *! */^89^JJ J7.yj 2 5'<?' .'•••. » i. /'. / N .* .* f 2>''^L - 27 r: 'jtxipk S— • .*^. I /■••:'• .fitil, .r.5<- .• :. r • Sai-' “itV. ♦*•’ \ y y .*•/ M-( oi/i^i/yL ipf-f ^ FO^/Y z 0 2^ ?<il 'Z6f ^ lli^lZ-^% = 72- £' 20 X >“ , TOlJfl, il V'/ ✓ 8 4 I ■• < V..«• < pi:V2^^ x!^y »,»• ‘ < .* .• ^ ,*11 >/ »• I • • - . 'L .• •cVi-.. ! mm HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE CUE) 0-75' 75-250' ij50-5C^ 5CC-1CC0' :isting 1|J\rdcover in Zone ^ . ---------------------- --1 ^ House ^ ^ x = -9-V^ -/6 s.f,A. LENGTH TI rnh 4 ficd< >1*aA ^ ^ 7 ^oraj «. _Ao(L^ SLdthlU— - W WIDTH X X 9^ 3L S.F. 934 S • f • /?oU< ^ 5Ktd _ B. Garage 0^ 231 V' S.F.cT'r* yi"= -/ Sc S.F. .59.^ X 4?3> V Si-... c. Driveway ^5^^X J3i — S.F. _ S.F,Ldn w C^etfc'5WI?utj /4V7 S.F. D. ‘Sidewalk i X 9^_ S.F. D Ai»ye. T/'inb f ^ock :Sa X /-To / S.F. E. ^W/ X if * ^S%LO '"s.F. )eck ST/ii’ili /4.S.F. F.Landscape AREAS underlain ?Iast.c- ■ SHEETING 3C S.F, //?S.F. :^y A S.F. ✓ S.F. otK /'‘/ioATTm —X Jn = _m S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone ‘•VDt *<oV s .f. •• Total P roperty Area in Zone fK3g.il.__S.F. bJ 3%'^.?? r- .. -f |TL2£3&4^ X 100 - /i3»2D '% >^7 Oi" ' ; • 2 ' 1 '".€1 1 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET ^cpA^:< ZONE: (circle one) 0-75' 75-250' ^"^0-5o5^ 5C0-ICC0' Hardcover in zone r-'v A. House ^X ALecy. adUtton LENGTH WIDTH X oA ,4__ ^ocJ<j^S/dthj/¥0' ^'S B. Garage ¥-£X j±Q. ^V. J V- c. D riveway o 0 X X D.Sidewalk /A i: 0 A'uc> Tth^h (1 /^Qt.^ ^ Q ; Cn^K*-Tt isbf ^0^^— Li :5V /*£■ F.Landscape areas UNDERLAIN IIast.c’ ■ sheeting 5 A av L G. Other Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone ?V5_ qi/J 'lj . '/= s.F. LiY S.F. Y3^s.F. 33r S.F. /C> • s.F. s.F. / -— S • f* • nuL s.F. 3A s.F. s.F. s.F. 3^ as s 3o jiV 5s 79. yy s.F. S.F. / S.F. vX S.F. \/F ,% 0 4 \ S.F.\ y • * s.F. S.F.• S.F. A ^57?.vy -/ ‘/:u,.is' S.F. B V/ £3. / f St't,i - * "79. X100 - /..S.3S' % '5'/ y r^t-FF y Y .^Fc S?S5-'/T u/-:.r =.(.T i '^"^ — fpv To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members Acting Administrator Gerhardson Prom;Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:July 16, 1991 Subject:#1665 Thomas McCarthy - 1424 Baldur Park Road - Variances - Referred Back to Planning Commission for Further Consideration Zoning District: LR-IC List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Site Plan/Existing Exhibit B - Site Plan Alternative A Excluding Overhang Exhibit C - Site Plan Alternative B Exhibit D - Site Plan Alternative C Exhibit E - Chart of Alternatives Exhibit F - Site Plan Alternative D Current Request Exhibits- Addendum Submitted for Orginial Review by Planning Commission Derrcription of Request: At the August 12th meeting of the Council, applicant prepared graphic sketches of the other options for improvements discussed at Planning Commission. Review Exhibits C r D. Council concurred with the majority opinion of Planning Commission and advised that it was the structural intensity of the improvement that presented the problem and advised applicant to revise improvment plans for additional review by Planning Commission. Please note as with the second review at the Planning Commission the overhang has no longer been included with the improvement project. The applicant has submitted a revised plan for Planning Commission consideration. Review Exhibit F, the current plan irvolves construction of a new construction of accessory structure and removal of former. The new garage is 24' x 23 ’ 4" . In addition to hardcover and street setback variances, the proposed garage will be 4' from the west lot line, requiring a side setback variance for new construction. The gravel area remaining will provide parking for at least one off site parking stall. Please review comparison chart submitted by applicant (Exhibit E), ;iote the following structural hardcover changes with each application. Existing - 344 s.f. Scheme A original proposal Scheme B *= 576 s.f. Scheme C ® 672 s.f. Scheme D (current request) 682 s.f 560 s.f. With the new alignment of the garage the sidewalk can nc’«» be placed in a straight alignment to the access door resulting in a decrease in hardcover. The tree can also be retained and the issue of access to the building is now reduced with the open corridor on the east side. 4 ■fv Zoning File #1665 August 16, 1991 Page 2 of 2 Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) - a. Street Setback Required = 30' Existing = 3' Proposed = 3+' Variance =27' or 90% b. Side Setback Required = 10' Existing = 1'6" Proposed = 4' Variance = 6' or 60% Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover Variance 75-250' Allowed = 2,223.5 s.f. or 25% Existing = 2,408 s.f. or 47% Proposed with Scheme D, Exhibit F = 1,866.6 s.f. or 36.4% total net reduction of 541.35 s.f. or 10.6% of hardcover. Applicants Hardships Statement Review Exhibit G, original addendum submitted at time of W first review. • • * • • . ~ •• 1 ^ - • «r * .* ■aMttwitina 't.------------- •'tr: » w V V. V.,;. '>■ r •s i < »» O)I I I I t I oo existing deck area existing house ir ~2 I ALI I-RNA nVtS DATA^\,^ •<• Ul 1wi Xo SCHEME’S* Ib 6 Uls UlXu VI tolpl Mertlcoirer Arm»1447 105;1305 too/ Oareg* *•••344 683 976 6/3 Parkin<j Area 193 364 144 Sidewalh A««a 182 365 261 luial Hardcover Reduction \/390 242 350 2(T'rrcc 'I'u Dc Removed X no yes no Demo iixisting Garage no yes f«Ml4 umIt existing parking (rock ) existing 0 Gr a g o \ ------------------------- . xy>\ V r-. i ORTI- 50.W Isle Boulevard L MML I I ■^1 CO C7* I ALTl-RNATIVI^ DA'rA^\^ t<»tM4C lr«» 1 5 • <• Ml 1 Ul Xo Ul •a• tti 2 Ml Xo Ul b• Ms Ul X O Ul tulel IlMUco-er Aiee I4A7 1007 120S 1097 Garage Area J44 C02 07G 072 Parking Area 049 193 3C4 144 aidewalli Area 294 102 3C5 201 luial llaidcovcr Kcilucliuii 390 242 3S0 20*Ticc ib Be KcmuvoJ no yes 110 Dciuo Cxi^liiii* Garauc /\no yes i.Ma NMir K£^^ove. MX'rtKus. X fAMCW*^ ting age RLS No . 6267 '''J — ORTH 1 7-4' Isle Boulevard IwiiHiMiiiirtfinaiiiii I I *«* oo I s I I I I I g m I A l_T E RIM AT I \/e "B ■^1 m :• I -5— EMOVE EXISTING 20* HARI •WOOD TF EE ft STUMP wetl o 0 1 io CO AU liUNA I IVi:.S liftlM. I.«f o 2, ¥* t •<• UJ 2 lU I O t/7 • • Mi 2 UJ Xout •u• Ml 2 Ul Zo Ml lulill liftfUCO»«r Aiuft M47 !U*j/1204 109/ Cat Ai •«344 GO 2 07G 072 Pftfkm\) Af««04<)193 364 144 SttlsMjth Ai«a 244 t02 2C6 2UI loLil llaidcuvci KcJiiUion 390 212 3M) 20^1 ICC III Uc KcmovoJ no yes no Dciiio G*ir»ir.c /\no yes liutl «M»ir REMOVE EXISTING WALK' jAND PARKING AREA AND REPLACE WIT^ NEW SOD 302 SQ ft REDUCtlON iN^ harocover HHIIH \\ RLS No. 6?67 • j. [REMOVE EXISTING GARAGE ANO| PARKING SURFACE AND REPLACE WITH NEW SOD 189 SQ.ft|||^^| REDUCTION IN HAROCOVER^^I Qii»inip»w» K l^j/ ORTI 28-0* 10-0* Isle Boulevard ___.V : ALTEFtlM/VTIV^ "O D I' L ' 0 8 ■' I 4 / I ? 5* 1 I I t * C r •. 0 n c ,\ /< C N •"•s'* j '•’ ‘j C D J S :: 0 e ; c 1 i M I C H I A L • MOL ARON { f ^\\t, /ASSOCIATES ALTERNATIVES DATA square feel Total Hardcover Area Garage Area Parking Area Sidewalk Area Fotal Hardcover Reduction 20'Tree To P'' Removed Demo Existing Garage oz Kco X UJ 1447 344 849 254 < t CG b m UJ 2 UJ Xo c/5 UJ 2 UJ I O </) UJ 2 U! X O 00 1057 1205 1097 682 576 672 193 364 144 182 265 281 390 242 350 no yes no no yes [.".’il S Q c UJ 2 UJ Xo 00 924 560 114 250 523 no yes A Additional Sideyard Variance Needed 8-14-91 M I C H I A L M U L A R O N ARCHITECTS &P 1 A N N 1 S' C c ONSOlTXNTS 7AS0 Currcll Blvd. • Suite 300 • Woodbury MN 55125 • (612)731 28J1 5 F- 1 iALTERIM/V-rivd: ”D” t r: ■• raa. M I C H I A I mnp ABONdl 4M U L A R O N I . . ’ A A s S () C I A T f S ___I June 19, 1991 0 It J ~ City Council Members Planning Commission Members City Staff of Orono Is 11 i". ‘4 RE: 1424 Baldur Park Road, Crystal Bay North Arm of Lake Minnetonka, VARIANCE REQUESTS Variance to Build Ga^aae within 30' Required Setback The hardship and description of unusual property conditions are due to the following: 1. 2. 3. 4. Extremely small lot and lot width of 50' requires door to face the road causing the need for 30' setback. Desire to add the ability to park two cars indoors. If we maintained a 30' setback and a 20' depth on the garage, we would require a setback var*iance from the house. A 20" hardwood tree is being protected and preserved by not sliding the garage back any further. Approximately 80% of the "root zone arention" is being maintained with this proposal. Hardcover Varience. 75' to 250' Zone The hardship and description of unusual property conditions are due to the following: 1.The existing lot is small. Even though the existing house and accessory buildings are very modest in size and no plastic sheeting or fabric has been used or proposed, the "Hardcover" is currently 47%. Tnis proposal will reduce that ration to 39.1% by removing and incorporating the existing "rock" parking surface and sidewalk. Approximately 405 sq. ft. of sidewalk and parking surface is being removed and landscaped. The remaining sidewalks west of the existing single car garage will be incorporated under the "new roof". The new drive will be bituminous. ♦ •• M 1 C H 1 A L • M U 1 A R O N 1 A R C H 1 T £ c T S &P 1 A \ N 1 N C C C) N S U 1 r A \ T s 7650 Cur r el! Blvd • Suite 300 • Woodbury M N 55125 •(612) 731 2831 G City Count!1 Members Planning Commission Members City Staff of Orono June 19, 1991 Page Two . . 4 ^ Tf 0n V* • %4 %.* Hardcover Variance. 0-75* Zone for Deck Reconstruction The hardship and practical difficulty and unusual property conditions for this hardcover variance are as follows: 1. The lot width does not allow for the deck to be relocated to one side or the other. 2. This existing amenity already totally lies within the 0-75' zone and there is nothing to be done to change this. 3. The request is to reconstruct a weed deck level with the finish floor over the exact existing deck area which is now one step beelow the finish floor of the house. The existing deck area is in disrepair and uneven. All of these above issues would result in undue hardship or practical difficulty if strict enforcement of the zoning regulations were imposed. Also, the unusual property conditions noted above prevent compliance with zoning code requirements. Thank you for consideration of these applications for variance. Michial Mularoni, Architect Tom McCarthy, O-vner ‘fi ■ " :a-\ ■ ciTT or oaoM ______ tUWM COMOMIOi HOnM iwr, Moaar it. im - ti— pm. am MM •urn - eoMcn aniMi «v«Tt. MMMMHmvi - Mwan Callahan 7it« !• lltM 0*7 of Ormm. TO* 01« Oryrtal 107 - trallalaary taMiaiataa. Clara ttX 1. »1*7« city mt Oroaa. 799 01« Cryata? Say M - Coaaitlonal Oaa tanlt - rablla Baarla* - City ■B«laaayCeMltlonal to fraaaat 7ilt r.a.1. 11979 JaaoB * raoalspa erabafe, 1919 Jaaaatowa >d * J199 tlath *»a ■ •aMlaialoa tor tactic BaatMat • tiO yji.4. 91971 Blaa miMaa. 199 taaaas Clrela 9 >941 taaaaa toMl/lalai of a Lot Llaa Baaira 9CT1OT 1T»9« - iaalao af thoaa Itaaa oill batwa.J. ach«Julad rablle baarlaya. at. Clasa I a yrloa to acm•rrlleanta proaaatlay oariaaoa r^oaata CoMlaaloa aro aakaT ta aoTO to tha po41aa at tba fr«* of tba CbMfeora okoa thoit arrlloatioa la mmmommoo* by tba 91999 JMoa 9. Barttall, IttY Cat Voriaaco - Coatlaoatlaa of rablle •aatibf 91911 Hart Jobaooa. 4491 tayoiao 9^ -yroUalaarT 9obai*lalao - Cootlnaatlaa of tablle Baoriaa 91999 JoMi Malkar, 1)19 ayroeo riaeo - Tarlaaco • tabllc Baariaa 91971 Braeo raraar, 1999 Hbyaata 91o9 - CoMltioaal Ooo tanlt - tabUo Baadaf 91971 Boaiaa 9 Boy HtrlM, 1» Bollaabar BoaB - taclaaaaa - toblle Baarlay 91971 Daalol J. Bloth, 1991 taa 9ttaat - Vatlaaea • tablte B'arlaa 91974 ttaaa 9 Bltca 9taab. 9M1 Matb Bbara ■rlaa - tartaaaaa - tabUa Baarla* - ^ fy tVHHMtf fYX>^I. i'f ■ ',i CITY or OHONO ADDITION NNILIMmANV PLAT PON THf CITY OP ONONO OP LOT I.BLOCK \ WH-ljOW PNOPCNTItt ADDITION b i ;■>-I I /r^ris.; J ' ; r1 /,r\ ! \ ) ■ f {• ' i I .» / ■■v\ iT)7:u I I I A i • I rs t)'r*.u«H€ ___ Vb p »//// t ntm /*.$» ttr mr- t < I LOT VBUK.1 (.►■•'' ; ;:. '' C- I •11 c , C I '■'t__^ ' ** •» I A.-' ‘¥ Y \ I I «'•/ *• / I/ / />» Oi.-fLor A ! t^ 97r OUTUOT A 0.ri tMut 1• • T j -y f« 's^» .1 r»% 1 **• ’-.1 •1 1 %1 - .:^s 1 1 • K A J*U0T1.BLX.2 1 . • 0 ! 1 a tttmtt s \ •4 * 4 1 1 1 I-________--------,_ 4----------. u* 2. neeh 1, wiUiN mwnrriiip AniiTi w U1, HIQHWAV NO H '->••--1 niiattnq CT»W-<j«« rkittai I NMin !tfw Ii0V9l iyV'.\ ii (.KUNHISi Iv.1 hrwH irrt»h tIm «urvry K mriir ufuirr my Ami «wf^- vwRfi jnd A«t 1 MR A Ally m^nArfrd (. i«l f ngtnerr athI 1 mvI ^^rvrrw imJrr r» ti<r« ti( tV Ut»t iM Mtnw» w<ji Mm* S I .mfliarft Mmnrvi4< 1 knw ^illl■^ ITTVt fMTt r^-i00 .*yas ;. /'<r 3 I. r.''4'p7/-' {ff^. 1^ •ic^SSfeeaes: , :-il >://^?' -A. ■^••( zf Ge • 'liC'Ti L ■• : IiJMI M ^V ' V-- '"'■' V"e^''‘'-.‘:*^ii. 'O'^- SI ^ ♦. *- . >oigy) WLiAW cm nuuD coimiiw llcvaion 1 I WATiltS«»»€>K«) W Pt DiSTAi y»»CltHQO HXMTiQN « ssr 111 111 i i| 1 ‘i fjMl 11 i T!1 JM» * KNNV OHMEK AN ■iMsnMM-w-n ■35^^ f * i f />t»*n) • f **• ** A«# #/«•*•#/ r#,.^»^4-i^‘^'^- ^'52« “* w«'-JL -.nN « iilf'iM: "Sis % imtiNt t^l cubiljll &imji ^t_»rt »f ^ ItortiMMt q«.,t.r of <—cTt>N< •• r«lloirai •««innifi9 «i , , !??!*!!**?? ®* •<Hitl»%»»«t qu»til# #o#%taM% c#fMr of ##I4 Northwai polNt In tN« NMit«rltNN of CMmt* Niah MATfUrsci «r?'**'* *•****• ‘••t ooNOwroi Nlemf Mi4 oootorliM %t •••» ••••t ot riolit ansu^j TSTs :‘4t:. «t:r:*.sr 0 tf; ‘ -V *v ^ . iu. ■*-. »vi. ?A:t'’■'■ *>* . y t.*:; ■ •::■/' ^ ■■ r ^V“r ---TV ,-fl-fSt n”!-' ‘ -.1 *ii.--..-—. .-^4^ :• *•■■' ■ ».■■■•*. -■« - - • - ■■■^ ■ ' ' JI-WNwwfxiwiii't , . . . ir V (mmm^ _y .^‘ - . i* -vr, [ faiJ ^ «Le V ■ ^64, -■ 'iM'*' ' ‘ -r • - —♦ :'W-'* ’» -••• TV '»_»</ ■ , ?3.4**'^>-..--.r^' VN5 • — » ■-*.- «>'« ■■ a: V ^ lir fc*-'',¥7^•*“?r'*■"■ '•'*■ ■' ' ‘“^-' ..; r';# ■■ t* ^-^ir* • '* j> ^ -■ ■ ■ V * * ♦* . '^•* . 'ifc- '*• ./ i' ■ -V : ., .. »r * , * » ■* » r V'« :r^. ’ -‘ \< ■•• rT“t-'^V -t.* - •-.•»,--rt’«'V ■ ■*' i y*''•I piebfbjeti ^t> raa^Kca rt V. I ■V ■*.' «r ♦i I) %^' iv^'. •■•C. l::^.:A:^ r - ;yw; • •- •'' fC-m !,:v-:^5- ;•• . - - ■*>> t/ -/rr.'^ . 'I#: ■ *^ m: I A p-' '.'FI ajs ciai KWlitiiO HOLLANDER *• til.i ----------------------------1 \ (\ \ -.........^<7ST^................................... A - \ ^ k I »- K^^sr ^^9** ffS 3fi otsif^o cory MMAKS • GAmCL LAND tLlVEYOM, INC. Mt>*«*«rU>««W *«r«i»»i« WK NMI »»*-« !«'r M»«*a« i •»••» «**I-I* !»!•» •>.♦ i« 1 Hu* (H4 COHtCI >*9)*f*H«MWn •« a •«>»•» •« ■< '•<• •*••• <KKnh*4 >•"< H'* •« IM •« *tt ku.Ht.n^ tn«. W««w>, M «tl »*IM* *nw«w<MWHw .* (h* Hwh •• •« m<« land r>l* Mo 42S^-<L ■<V>I| - t^^7/ .J..%tm / .? ' / !!"•i li ■ SS“® #1672 ^:r'; i-r W . ti i"» v^_.. ■*•»'» ' ’f/*V %i _ - i£t» L . __________ : -I • T -------------- - ->i--------------------1 •#>- y-'/' <r««i '»/<• • --■tjLi Qnr«»*f’ “U/• &«• •» nytv*M/e it: .r^~_“_r' S3C:^c:>^ ^39^ 33 "a/ 1'; t ;!l -i « ^ I S ^'i; « * •I - • ’ ' ■;.: t t; ; ' A 30* . af il l .1 I't' , «« i*m« M »• |«« tatMa •! ta .twtMiaan -t »*». h«n •> m wat itad r>KNe 4ZS£-C # i * «i» \%^ •ook * /^5-7/■ 1 ' ■ \ I I