Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-21-1991 Planning PacketI CouncilPlanning Cormission PUBLIC A'lTENDAMCS CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATS / PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY Rr.CORDS. r CITY OP ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, OCTOBER 21, 1991 - 7:00 P.M. 1275 BRONN ROAD SOOTH - COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - Mayor Barbara Peterson ATTENDANCE - SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS - 7:00 p.m.1. #1691 City of Long Lake, 130 Orono Orchard Road North A, Amendment of Community Management Plan B, Rezoning C, Preliminary Subdivision 8:00 p.m.2. #1695 Thomas & Alice Stuck and John M. Bauer, 4345/4365 North Shore Drive A. Subdivision of Lot Line Rearrangement B. Variance to Moratorixun Ordinance No. 96, Second Series ACTION ITEMS - Review of these items will commence prior to or between scheduled public hearings. Applicants presenting variance requests before the CoBBission are asked to move to the podium at the front of the Chambers when their application is announced by the Chairman. 3.#1626 Eric Wilson, 2683 North Shore Drive - Variance Revision - Referral from Council 4.#1682 Christine Brickley, 3262 North Shore Drive Variance ~ Continuation of Public Hearing 5.#1683 Robert F. Suess, 2590 Watertown Road - Preliminary Subdivision/Class III - Continuation of Public Hearing 6.#1687 Robert J. Bilger, 4005 North Shore Drive - Variances - Public Hearing 7.#1688 Jim Buranen, 1085 Brown Road South - Appeals - Public Hearing I .8.#1689 Terry Sadler, 1396 Baldur Park Road - Variances - Public Hearing 9.#1690 William Pogue, 1991 Eagerness Point Road Appeals - Public Hearing . |j*v>r CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAYr OCTOBER 21, 1991 - 7:00 P.M. 10. #1692 Bruce W. Engelsma, 990 Partenwcod Road - Variances - Public Hearing 11.#1693 Albert D. Hanser, 1685 Fox Street ~ A. Variance to Moratorium Ordinance No. 96, Second Series Public Hearing B. Sketch Plan Review - Not an Action Item 12. #1694 Douglas Merz, 3195 Watertown Road - Variance - Public Hearing 13. #1696 Stephen & Joanie Ward, 4695 North Shore Drive Variances - Public Hearing Planning CoonBisslon Cooiments - 14. Report by Planning Commission representative to Council meeting of October 14, 1991. 15. Status report by Lake Use Committee representatives. 16. Status report by Facilities Committee representatives. 17. Other issues. Additional Items 18. Planning Commission approval of minutes of the September 16, 1991 meeting. 19. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend November 12, 1991 Council meeting. AdjoaznBcmt - .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. nii ■ October 21/ 1991 Dear CounciImen, Pogues erected a very large skateboard ratnp five feet line directly obstructing our view of the lake , family room, and screened porch. It clearly is in violation of all set-back and ground cover ordinances. Besides the ^^^ossible an eyesore, the noise, when it is in use, would make it impossible for us to use our screened poarch or back yard for any . moments. Part of living on Lake Minnetonka is to enjoy the aesthetic beauty of the lake in close proximity. We believe neighbors have an obligation to treat each other and our lake property with respect. We would like to see the skateboard ramp removed. Sincerely, Mary and Pat McGovern 11 I ii , k«l*»i.«»^- <.»** ‘LU«»*v James A. Mitchell 2685 North Shore Drive Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 October 16,1991 tT err,' zr M •^ C^C'.O '0CT 1 8 1991 Orono City Council P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Council Members: Re: 2683 North Shore Drive At your October 28 meeting, you will consider a variance request from Eric Wilson to construct a new home on the property immediately east of ours. Pat and I have reviewed Eric's plans with him and his architect. We believe them to be appropriate and compatible with the residential nature of this area. We request that you grant the variance as Eric requests. Thanks for your consideration. Sii^rely, James A. Mitchell CC: ErieWUson i I lai* .« M I UAfc'.'l ^ M ^ ■« j kkX^AkAikilik.M.. I 1^ . liAi A II.' « 1 Am h. ‘ ^ I. m f ' To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:October 17, 1991 Subject:#1691 City of Long Lake, 130 Orono Orchard Road North Variances ~ Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. %- Section 10.06, Subd. 3 (B) (3) - Amendment of official map/rezoning. Applicant's comprehensive land use application proposes rezoning from current RR-IB rural residential 2 acre zoning to R-IA, 1 acre sewered residential. Section 10.20. R-IA. One family residential district. Pto-Tflitted, conditional and accessory uses plus lot standards for development purposes. Section 10.55, Subd. 8 - Development restricted. Except as hereinafter specifically permitted, no filling, grading, dredging, excavation, hardcover, temporary or permanent structures, obstruction, septic systems, well or other construction shall be allowed within the flood plain and wetlands area nor on any laads within 26' of a wetland......... Section 10.55, Subd. 15 (A) ^2) - For property served by municipal sanitary sewer, the minimum lot area may be divided by flood fringe lands provided at least 1/2 acre of land not within the protected area is included in one contiguous parcel and both municipal sewer and legal access is available to that building site without encroachment on the protected area. Chapter 11 - All ordinances pertinent to Class III subdivision. Class III subdivisions are defined as those subdivisions dealing with dedication of roads, utilities and drainage easements, drainage easements over wetland and flood plain areas. / j !%* Zoning File #1691 October 17, 1991 Page 2 List of Exhibits A - Application B “ Property Ovmers List C - Plat Map D - Joint Resolution of the Cities of Long Lake and Orono E - Settlement Agreement F - Declaration of Covenant - Sample G - Applicant's Addendum H - Subsurface Report for Proposed Residential and Street Construction I - Pace Laboratories Report on Pollutant Contamination J - McComas Report 10/08/91 (Bonestroo, Anderlik & Rosene) K - DNR Report 9/12/91 L - MCWD Report 9/30/91 M - Hydrographic Work Report - Long Lake - DNR N - Wetland Map 0 - Aerial Map P - Land Use/Zoning Map of Surrounding Long Lake and Orono Q - 1 - 2 - Conceptual Development Plans of Property - Prior to Application . 1" a 50' Scale Plan for Lot 1, Block 1 • Flood Plain Map • Long Lake Creek • Development Plan Packet Includes Location Map, Preliminary Plat and Grading, Drainage and Utility Plans R S T U A* Conprehenslve Plan Amendment Review Exhibits D, E, F and G. In order to implement the necessary land use steps to fulfill the agreement between the cities of Long Lake and Orono, the applicant and owner, the City of Long Lake, has filed a comprehensive land use application consisting of a comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning and preliminary subdivision application. Upon completion of the City of Orono's review and the formal acceptance of the findings of that review by the City of Long Lake, the subject property will be annexed by the City of Long Lake. All development of the property will be administered by the personnel of Long Lake per the standards set forth by Orono and controlled with the development standards set forth in covenants to be filed against the Chain of Title of the property. The City Attorney has advised that the sample covenant enclosed as Exhibit F shall be expanded to include both development controls desired by both the City of Long Lake and as required by the ordinances of the City of Orono. % f-- Zoning Pile #1691 October 11, 1991 Page 3 The Comprehensive Plan Amendment will be completed by the City of Orono. In fact, the realignment of the MUSA line will be incorporated in a recent Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Number 3) that has been deliberately delayed for filing with the Metro Council until the completion of this review. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment will consist of realigning the Metropolitan Urban Service Area line to include the now rural 25 acre parcel. Sewer and water service will come from the City of Long Lake and be credited against their allowed units. The extension of water and sewer lines are shown on the utility plans within Exhibit U (sheet 3). The current Comprehensive Plan Amendment is similar in many ways to the recent Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 2 that considered major land use changes for properties along Highway 12. As with Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 2 there was little in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment that provided direction for the 1988 amendment. The current proposal requires no major capital improvements as sewer and water lines are adjacent to the property. The proposed one acre sewered zoning will serve as a buffer between the railroad and the surrounding rural residential within Orono (one unit per 2 acre in Orono and the adjacent Long Lake densities from two units per acre to high density residential townhouse development on north side of Burlington Railroad). The 24 acre parcel could not be developed at a 13 unit density if sewer and water were not made available. In discussions with surrounding Orono property owners, concerns were raised as to the rezoning to 1 acre. If the City was to proceed with the current RR-IB, rural zoning, area variances would have to be granted - total area equals 25 acres, excluding road dedication and exception for MWCC lift station property, the area is 24 acres. Orono Code whether this is developed as a PRD or conventional plat requires a total acreage of 26 acres for 13 units. The findings noted by staff are an Interesting exercise and under normal conditions would never be accepted by the City with a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to realign the MUSA to include 24 acres of severely limited lands for development at higher densities. Under normal conditions these lands would have been developed as large lots incorporating all of the conservation lands. Members of the Planning Commission, this is anything but a usual land use application. The City of Long Lake is the applicant. An agreement entered into by both cities to resolve a long drawn out annexation dispute requires the City of Long Lake to file this application. The City of Orono has agreed to consider and act on a 13 lot subdivision and we, both staff and Planning Commission, are obligated to provide both Councils with planning advice and guidance in the development of this property. •^^****‘* infUiMi-rnifT -mt -mfi*i ------ Zoning File #1691 October 17r 1991 Page 4 It may be your first inclination to assume that you will recommend denial but we hope before motions to deny are raised we ask that you delay any form.al action until all information is presented by the applicant. David Squire, the planner for the project and an associate of McCombs Frank Roos Associates, the Orono staff and consultants have all worked very closely together this past month to prepare the preliminary submittals. Additional information has been called for by the various reviewing agencies and has yet to be submitted by applicant. (The delay for applicant's planner has been the inability to arrange for the necessary site inspections by these agencies within a reasonable time frame.) It has been the goal of both Mr. Squire and staff to provide the best possible subdivision application given conflict between the directives of our current code and the need to obtain 13 lots via a conventional plat. We look for your assistance, not your criticism. The subdivision will be presented to the Council we hope with the Planning Commission's input. B. Rezoning w If we were to achieve a 13 lot plat of the 24 acre property via a conventional plat, the plat had to be rezoned to 1 acre. All of the formal agreements dealing with the annexation failed to provide directions as to how the 13 units were to be implemented -— but it was to be accomplished per Orono Codes. At first it was thought through a Planned Residential Development similar to a Sugar Woods but the agreements did discuss lots and the applicant has pursued and filed for a conventional 13 lot plat. All R-IA standards will be applicable as already stated above. In reviewing Exhibit P, the 1 acre per unit appears to be a good buffer between the 2 acre densities within Orono and the surrounding LL densities of 2 units per acre. The R-IA standards are as follows: 1. 2. 1 acre in area as property is sewered. Conservation areas (wetlands/flood plain) may intersect the lot but each lot must have a minimum 1/2 acre dry contiguous building pad. 3.35' setback for front and rear and 10' setbacks to the side. 26' setback from all wetland areas and the Ordinary High Water Mark of the creek (determined at the top of the bank). The DNR is currently determining the Ordinary High Water Mark of the lagoon or former sewer pond and a 26' setback must be maintained from the Ordinary High Water Mark of the lagoon. Specific lot configuration issues shall be reviewed under the preliminary subdivision comment section. I !■ irn ‘ f nr r in^i ~i i nfcrili^ifli [: Zoning File #1691 October 17, 1991 Page 5 Preliminary Subdivision - 13 Lot Plat, Class ill The 13 lot subdivision is to be known as Fleming Trail Addition. The wastewater treatment facility that formerly occupied this property was abandoned some time in the early 80's. The original facility was installed some time in the very early 60's. Today the only thing that remains is the MWCC lift station property that appears as the exception on the plat drawings and an underground force main. The 16" force main runs from the lift station to Orono Orchard Road and is located within the actual travelled road that serves as access for MWCC service trucks and vehicles in addition to the Long Lake vehicles that use the current facility for exterior storage. There are many similarities between this property and the Orono sewer pond property. Refer to Exhibit N. Note the 1-1/2 acre wetland designated as Glenco soils to the south of the sewer pond. This area has been filled in at the time of the original installation of the sewer pond back in the early 60's. If you review Steve McComas' report. Exhibit J, specifically the last paragraph on Page 1, he notes that at this point in the 1990's there are no indicators that would characterize this area as a wetland area any longer based on the hydrology and vegetation. As a result this area is now classified as dry buildable. Once again refer to Exhibit N. The area to the north designated at 1/2 acre Glenco soils has been partially filled adjacent to the railroad tract, the applicant has shown the wetland area per the City's wetland maps on the plat and shall be protected with drainage easements. Please refer to Mr. McComas' report (Exhibit J) and Exhibit R. At a site inspection staff delineated the boundaries of the wetlands based on hydrology and vegetation. The proposed house on Lot 1, Block 1 has been shown encroaching the defined wetland. Later on in the memo we will review in more detail the issues of flood plain, surface run-off retention and drainage. The applicant has applied for density credit for Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1 and Lots 9 and 10, Block 2. Lot Configuration All of the lots but Lot 1, Block 1 meet the area requirements. Lot 1 has approximately 1/3 acre of dry contiguous land. Each lot meets the lot width at the 35' front street setback line. All proposed residential building sites meet the required setback standard except for Lot 1, Block 1. Review Exhibit U, Sheet 3. Note the proposed residence not only encroaches the defined or designated wetland area but in preliminary discussions with the Watershed District is more than likely located within a flood plain. There may be additional dry buildable land to the southeast side of the pond to provide a 1/2 ab.__ Zoning File #1691 October 17, 1991 Page 6 acre dry contiguous envelope for another residential lot. Proposed Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 should be combined as one. All lots meet the required 140' of width at the 35' setback. Note Lot 4, Block 2 although a flagged lot achieving access via the cul-de-sac has adequate width along the interior plat road along the west side lot line. Road and Utilities The plat road has been designed at a 50' width with 100' cul-de-sacs. The proposed cul-de-sac to the north side is not needed as total access for 13 lots is provided along the spur section of the cul-de-sac road that extends east and southward. The extension road starting at the southwest corner of Lot 10 shall be designated as a separate road outlot and should be developed at the time the roadway serves the development on the north side of the Burlington Northern Railroad. Note an access easement must be obtained from the MWCC if this is to be realized. David Squire will provide additional information on potential development of property on north side of railroad. The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed curb cut at Orono Orchard Road and finds no sighting problems. The only concern is for the residence in Orono as house is located Immediately opposite the intersection and will be impacted by the headlights from the cars that approach the intersection. Sewer will be extended from the MWCC lift station to all lots within Block 2 and Lot 3, Block 1. Sewer will come from Orchard Drive within the Orchard Meadows plat on the southwest side of Orono Orchard Road to serve Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. Water lines will be extended from the Orchard Meadow plat to serve all 13 lots. It should be noted that the City of Orono will not ask for engineering plans for the interior plat road or utilities as the improvements will be installed at the time the property is de-annexed by the City of Orono. It should also be noted that the Public Works Department has asked that any disruption of Orono Orchard Road by the expansion of municipal services must require the repair of the road to its original state. Drainage, Flood Plain, Wetlands As already noted above, staff has met on the site with the DNR in order to commence the process of determining an Ordinary High Water Mark for the DNR protected wetland. Ceil Strauss advised that once the Ordinary High Water Mark is determined the lands above the Ordinary High Water Mark elevation would be protected by the Corps of Engineers. The City of Long Lake will be required to file a permit with the DNR and the Corps to expand the plat road from the current 15' width to a 30' width. The applicant seeks to move westward with the road rather than encroach into the bank and the existing mature vegetation that lines the road along the east side. The DNR agent has apparently J Zoning File #1691 October 17, 1991 Page 7 accepted the position of the City and applicant. It should also be noted that the former sewer pond has now been restored to its original state of a wetland and for all intents and purposes looks like and acts like a wetland. The fence that surrounds the former pond will be removed upon completion of the subdivision. Review Exhibit L. The MCWD advises that an analysis will be required to determine the elevation of the flood plain also noting that storm water run-off from the developed site cannot be stored at or below the flood plain elevation and must be stored above. Review Exhibit S. The current flood plain map shows the entire area of the sewer pond within the flood plain. Based on the MCWD report storm water run-off from development could be directed to the pond. In preliminary discussions with Mr. Quanbeck, he advised that the flood plain would be probably 12' above the flowline of the creek at 938.5 putting the flood plain at approximately 950.5. This would confirm that the proposed building site within Lot 1, Block 1 is located within a flood plain requiring fill to bring it 1 foot above the flood plain at 951.5. In fact, all building sites must be 1' above the defined flood plain. It will be necessary for the City staff to meet with both applicant and the Watershed District to reach some compromise regarding use of pond for retention purposes. It would also appear that the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has voiced concern with the discharge of nutrients, specifically high phosphorus levels, into the creek and eventual watershed. Various options have been presented for the applicant's consideration. Certain ones appear most objectionable to the City, specifically the treatment with chemicals. If applicant must provide retention above a flood plain elevation, this may have an impact on the dry buildable area of the proposed 13 lots. In light of the concerns expressed by the Watershed District, staff would ask that you review once again Exhibit J, Steve McComas' report specifically on Page 2 of that report where he reviews the analysis of the soil borings of the former sewer pond. The report notes no problems with sediment contamination and that results are comparable if not better than what is found in some storm water detention basins. It also appears the MPCA does not require any further testing as a result of the proposed residential development and that in his opinion for a typical storm water detention pond or wastewater lagoon that the likelihood of serious sediment contamination is small and no additional sampling is needed at this time. These obvious conflicting views must be resolved before we can proceed with the review. Mr Squire has advised that the MCWD was not sent a copy of McComas' report. Zoning File #1691 October 17, 1991 Page 8 Staff Recoanendation Staff recommends tabling of the application until both applicant and the City can resolve the following Issues: i' 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. DNR to determine the OHW of the pond/wetland area and and at the same time establish jurisdiction line of the Corps of Engineers. Both applicant and City to work with MCVTO to determine flood plain elevation for property and to make any necessary change in preliminary plans providing retention above the flood plain elevation. Combine Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 as one building site and develop a new residential unit to south and east side of plat. Applicant may wish to reconsider use of PRD providing greater flexibiliti' in designing building sites. Upon determination of flood elevation, the first floor elevation of all residen..ss must be 1* above the flood plain elevation plan should be amended where necessary. 5. Provide additional surveying Information as follows: & • b. c. Provide culvert elevation and size at intersection of Long Lake Creek and Orono Orchard Road on the north side. Elevation of outlet from sewer pond. Specific elevation information requested by DNR upon site inspection wicnin the pond or lagoon area. Applicant to make a recommendation concerning desire of City to reduce impact of car lights on residence Immediately opposite intersection of plat road, i.e. relocation, plantings, grading? CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION PROPERTY LOCATION n i J 'V-*.'' site Address Former Long Lake Treatment! Facility Site 1^0 Orono OrcharcL Rd 35-118-23-32-0005 35-118-23-33-0001 Property Identification Humber (P.I.D. ) 35-118-23-32-0006_____ Please check one - Property abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application. See Preliminary Plat APPLICANT jgff Roos* City Engineer Name City of Long Lake Phone (home) Phone (work) 476-6010 c/o McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. Address; 15050 23rd Ave. North ________ City; Plymouth. Mn Zip; 55447 OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (hcmea) Name Phone (work) Address;City;Zip: (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size 20.0 s.o - 25.0 Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels CITY Cf ORONO rnance office Present Use (check)Residential; no. of uni f,fW) X Other (specify) City Storaa».-.^3^c^" (W '''RECEIPT-''Hm YOU Present Zoning District rr-IB_____________ . COOl ROl T08:3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- ~^y23/9 PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites; 13 Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density;Units per 1.92 Acres Minimum Lot Size; 1 Ac./ \ ac. nln. Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land * Proposed Use; (check)Residential Other (specify) * Refer to narrative regarding Lot 1, Block 1. RUN DATE Ot/Z^/n HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OI#IERS LIST •BATCH OOA # SB S4-11B-2S 44 OOOS \ *•.PROP AOOR 00135 ORONO ORCHARD OltCR NAHi EOMUNO M F RYDELL TAXPAYER EDMUND RYDELLt f '• NAME/ADDR 135 ORONO ORCHARD RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 RD N PROP AOOR OmER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR ^ / PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP ADDR 0»t«R NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR t . r- PROP AOOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR r; PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR ry- c Ml SO S5-116-2S S3 OOOS 00105 ORONO ORCHARD RO N GAD KELLENBER6ER 6RE6 S KELLEteERGER 105 ORONO ORCHARD RO LONG LAKE MN 55S56 SO S5-lia>2S SS OOOS 01565 ORONO OAKS DR 0 N FRANCHOT 111 ET AL 0 N FRANCHOT Ill/A T BARRALL 1565 ORONO OAKS OR LONG LAKE MN 55S56 SS 35-110-23 36 0005 00060 ORONO ORCHARD RO N DAB STRUYK 0 A A BARBARA A STRUYK 60 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD N NAY2ATA MN 55391 SS 35-110-23 36 OOOS 0003S ADDRESS UNASSIGNED C 0 NOLAN A E M NOLAN CHARLES D/ELIZABETH M NOLAN 635 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 36-11S-23 61 0051 001S5 ORCHARD CIR R A L HECOMOVICH R M A L T HECOMOVICH 105 ORCHAliD CIR LONG LAKE MN 55356 » ♦ ♦ A • . • 6. • . V . ’ % • » 3S 35-11S-23 32 0006 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED VIL OF LONG LAKE CITY OF LONG LAKE PO BOX L - 1966 PARK AVE LONG LAKE MN 5S3S6 38 35-118-23 33 0006 00025 ORONO ORCHARD GLORIA G GILMER GLORIA G GILMER 25 ORONO ORCHARD RD N LONG LAKE m 5S3S6 RO N 30 35-118-23 33 0009 00020 ORONO ORCHARD RO N CHEYENNE LAND COMPANY NOHELL F FREEMAN 20 ORONO ORCHARD RD HAYATA MN 55391 38 35-118-23 36 0006 01350 ORONO OAKS OR J J A S A PALMER JAMES A SHIRLEY PALMER 1350 ORONO OAKS DRIVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 35-118-23 36 0013 01335 ORONO OAKS OR CHEYEttlE LAND COMPANY SUZA^t4E K NELSON 1335 ORONO OAKS DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 36-118-23 61 0052 00187 ORCHARD CIR HESLEY S BENOICKSON ETAL HESLEY A JULIA BENOICKSON 187 ORCHARD CIR LONG LAKE MN 55356 •4 REPORT NO. PI635601 PAGE 16 i •'4 38 35-110-23 33 0001 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNCO VIL OF LONG LAKE CITY OF LONG LAKE PO BOX L - 1966 PARK AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 • . i 38 35-118-23 33 0007 01555 ORONO OAKS DR D H SHAN AMR SHAN DONALD H A MARLENE R SHAN 1555 ORONO OAKS OR LONG LAKE MN 55356 I ■ f 38 35-118-23 33 0010 00030 ORONO ORCHARD RD N J L MURPHY ASS SMITH JAMES MURPHY A SANDRA SMITH 30 ORONO ORCHARD RO N MAYZATA W 55391 38 35-118-23 36 0007 01320 ORONO OAKS OR . D D A A N CARLSON HILLIAM A BEVERLY JEttlEY JR 1320 ORONO OAKS DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 *. • A 72 36-118-23 61 0003 00260 ORONO ORCHARD RO RICHARD POOUETTE ETAL RICHARD POOUETTE 260 ORONO ORCHARD RD LONG LAKE MINN 55356 fn.’ .'-: V-? V '{ |«BmL • * ■i ■i 72 36-118-23 61 0053 00109 ORCHARD CIR C A J MORRISON CLINTON H MORRISON 189 ORCHARD CIR , LONG LAKE MN 55356 . i : ■« . . I .. •• ' • I ' i ^ • J ■ r ^ ■1 . % m f »( RUN DATE 06/24/n BATCH 004 PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP AOOR OtCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR ■■■>. t PROP ADDR ONNER NAME 5 I^AYER M^/AODR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 72 S4-118-23 n 0054 OOin ORCHARD CIR P B ELLINGBOE ET AL PAUL B ELLINGBOE 191 ORCHARD CIR LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 34-116-23 44 0014 00147 MEADON LA JOHN B NENMAN ^ JOHN B NE»f1AN 147 MEADON LANE LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 34-118-23 44 0017 00173 MEADON LA CAP ROSE CHARLES E ROSE 173 MEADON LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 . 72 34-118-23 44 0020 00179 MEADON LA N A A NC INTYRE NILLIAM E MC INTYRC 179 MEADON LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 35-116-23 31 0001 01325 NAYZATA BLVO N TAN NOLF THEODORE F HOLF 2622 COUNTY ROAD 24 LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 35-118-23 32 0001 01325 NAYZATA BLVD N THEODORE F HOLF THEODORE F NOLF 2622 COUNTY ROAD 24 LONG LAKE MN 55356 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY ONNERS LIST 72 34-116-23 41 0055 00195 ORCHARD CIR P M SCHOON A C F SCHOON PETER M A CARLA F SCHOON 195 ORCHARD CIR LONG LAKE m 55356 72 34-118-23 44 0015 00169 MEADON LA J H TODD APB TODD JAMES M TOOD AND PATRICIA D TODD 169 MEADON LA LONG LAKE MN 55447 72 34-118-23 44 0018 00175 MEADON LA M J DALTON A S J DALTON MICHAEL J DALTON 175 MEADON LANE LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 34-118-23 44 0021 00181 r^ADON LA D A A C A TRUOELL DAVID A CYNTHIA TRUOELL 181 MEADON LANE LONG LAKE m 55356 72 35-118-23 31 0029 00287 GLENMOOR LA M C FELLGER ETAL MERILL C FELLGER 287 GLENMOOR LANE LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 35-118-23 32 0004 00260 ORONO ORCHARD RICHARD POQUETTE ETAL RICHARD POQUETTE 260 ORONO ORCHARD RO LONG LAKE MINT4 55356 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 15 72 34-118-23 44 0013 00165 MEADON LA J K ANDERSON A J L ANDERSON JAMES K A JOAN L ANDERSON 165 MEADON LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 34-118-23 44 0016 00171 MEADON LA NANCY M SHAVER NANCY M SHAVER 171 MEADON LANE LONG LAKE MN 55356 IjissA, 72 34-118-23 44 0019 00177 MEADON LA T A I VETTEL THOMAS 6 VETTEL 177 MEADON LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 34-118-23 44 0022 00183 MEADON LA R E C NILSON ARE NILSON RICHARD A RHONDA NILSON 183 MEADON LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 35-118-23 31 0030 00275 GLENMOOR LA G A J EDNARDS GLENN E EDNARDS 275 GLENMOOR LANE LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 35-118-23 32 0005 00072 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO VIL OF LONG LAKE CITY OF LONG LAKE PO BOX L - 1964 PARK AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 * f * «• r J* • ► I rtiif firlil i F T7 I -■t.. RUN DATE Oa/tA/91 BATCH OM PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP AOOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR HEMCPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0»R«RS LIST 72 35-110-25 32 0007 00072 AOORESS UNASSIGNEO BURLIN810N NORTHERN RY BURLINGTON NORTHERN RY 72 35-110-23 32 002A OliOl HAYZATA BLVD H R C A J M BORDEN RICHARD r. BORDEN 0605 SALLY LANE EDINA MN 55435 72 35-110-23 32 0027 01001 HAYZATA BLVO N KEITH J OASNER KEITH J OASNER 1001 NAYZATA BLVD N APT F LONB LAKE MN 55350 72 35-110-23 32 0030 01595 NAYZATA BLVO H DARLIS NOROHACEN DARLIS J N0RDHA6EN 1595 N NAYZATA BLVD UNIT A LONO UU(E MN 55350 72 35-110-23 32 0033 01595 NAYZATA BLVO N M H HANSEN ET AL TRUSTEES MALCOLM H HANSEN CAi ROBERT FRENCH 5100 OAWLE DR SUITE 430 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55410 PROP AOOR 0»MER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 72 35-110-23 32 0030 01595 NAYZAIa SLVO H LORRAINE M NIICHEL LORRAINE M NIICHEL 1595 N HAYZATA BLVD UNIT G LONG LAKE MN 55304 • f 72 35-110-23 32 0022 01001 NAYZATA BLVO H JOHN A JOHNSON JOHN A JOHNSON BRIMSTONE HILL RD AMHERST NH 03031 72 35-110-23 32 0025 01001 NAYZATA BLVO N RICHARD C BORDEN DENNIS E MCGREEVY 1001 NAYZATA BLVD N UNIT 0 LONG LAKE MN 55350 72 35-118-23 32 0028 01001 NAYZATA BLVO N RICHARD C BORDEN JAMES M LYNCH 1601 HAYZATA BLVO N APT G LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 35-110-23 32 0031 01595 HAYZATA BLVD H M H HANSEN ET AL TRUSTEES MALCOLM H HANSEN C/0 ROBERT FRENCH 5100 GAMBLE OR SUITE 430 ST LOUIS PARK m 55410 B •" 35-118-23 32 0034 01 <*5 NAYZATA BLVO N M H HANSEN ET AL TRUSTEES MALCOLM H HANSEN C/0 ROBERT FRENCH 5100 GAMBLE OR SUITE 430 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 72 35-110-23 32 0037 01595 NAYZATA BLVD N CURTIS S GUSTAFSON ET AL CURTIS GUSTAFSON 5729 JUNEAU LA N PLYMOUTH MN 55440 REPORT NO. P1435401 PAGE 10 72 35-110-23 32 0023 01001 HAYZATA BLVD N R C S J M BORDEN RICHARD C BORDEN 0605 SALLY LANE EDINA MN 55435 B 72 35-110-23 32 0026 01601 NAYZATA BLVO N TARA MARIE LINOEEN TARA M LINDEEN 1601 NAYZATA BLVD N APT E LONG LAKE W 55350 E 72 35-110-23 32 0029 01601 NAYZATA BLVD H I S N MABUSTH AMP CALLAHAN STUART MABUSIH/MARY CALLAHAN 1601 HAYZATA BLVD APT H LONG LAKE rtl 55356 •I % 72 35-118-23 32 0032 01595 NAYZATA BLVD N M H HANSEN ET AL TRUSTEES MALCOLM H HANSEN C/O ROBERT FRENCH 5100 GAMBLE DR SUITE 430 ST LOUIS PARK W 55416 72 35-110-23 32 0035 01595 HAYZATA BLVO N M H HANSEN ET AL TRUSTEES MALCOM H HANSEN C/O ROBERT FRENCH 5100 GAMBLE OR SUITE 430 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 72 35-110-23 32 0030 01505 HAYZATA BLVO H BEVERLY A YOUNESS BEVERLY A YOUNESS 1505 A NEST NAYZATA BLVO LONO LAKE MN 55356 i 4* >y RUN DATE Oa/26/91 BATCH OOA PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OltCR NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP AODR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP AOOR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR fr. PROP AOOR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR t-- HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OHNERS LIST 72 S5-I16-2S S2 0039 01585 NAYZATA BLVO N C C KORTH I L H STEERE CALVIN C KORTH 1585B NEST NAYZATA BLVO LONG LAKE HN 55356 B 72 35-118-23 32 0062 01585 NAYZATA BLVO N E TRUSTEES OF SHEET HETAL HORKERS BAYSHORE TONNHOHES INC C/0 HAURICE J NAGENER 12520 NAYZATA BLVO HINNETGNKA HN 55S43 72 35-MB-23 32 0065 01575 NAYZATA BLVO N TRUSTEES OF SHEET HETAL BAYSHORE TONNHOHES INC C/0 HAURICE J NAGENER 12520 NAYZATA BLVO HINNETONKA m 55363 B :ers 72 35-118-23 32 0068 01575 NAYZATA BLVO N E TRUSTEES OF SHEET HETAL HORKERS BAYSHORE TONNHOHES INC C/Q HAURICE J NAGENER 12520 NAYZATA BLVO HIMCTONKA HN 55363 72 35-118-23 32 0051 01555 NAYZATA BLVO N B TRUSTEES OF SHEET HETAL NORKERS BAYSHORE TONNHOHES INC C/O HAURICE J NAGENER 12520 NAYZATA BLVO HINNETONKA HN 55363 72 35-118-23 32 0056 01555 NAYZATA BLVO N E TRUSTEES OF SHEET HETAL NORKERS BAYSHORE T0IM40HES INC C/O HAURICE J NAGENER 12520 NAYZATA BLVO HlNNETOTiU HN 55363 s » 72 35-118-23 32 0060 01585 NAYZATA BLVO H C TRUSTEES OF SHEET HETAL NORKERS BAYSHORE TONNHOHES INC C/O HAURICE J NAGENER 12520 NAYZATA BLVO HINNETONKA HN 55363 72 35-118-23 32 0063 01585 NAYZATA BLVO H F TRUSTEES OF SHEET HETAL NORKERS BAYSHORE TONNHOHES INC C/O HAURICE J NAGENER 12520 HAYZATA BLVO HINNETONKA »tl 65345 72 35-118-23 32 0046 01575 NAYZATA BLVO H C TRUSTEES OF SHEET HETAL HORKERS BAYSHORE TONNHOHES INC C/O HAURICE J NAGENER 12520 HAYZATA BLVO HirMETONKA HN 55343 72 35-118-23 32 0049 01575 HAYZATA BLVO H F TRUSTEES OF SHEET HETAL NORKERS BAYSHORE T0I«4H0HES INC C/O HAURICE J NAGENER 12520 HAYZATA BLVO HINNETONKA HN 55343 72 35-118-23 32 0052 01555 HAYZATA BLVU H C TRUSTEES OF SHEET HETAL HORKERS BAYSHORE TOHNHOHES INC C/O HAURICE J HAGENEH 12520 HAYZATA BLVO HirtlETONKA HN 55343 72 35-118-23 32 0055 01555 HAYZATA BLVO H F TRUSTEES OF SHEET HETAL HORKERS BAYSHORE TO»tlHOHES INC C/O HAURICE J NAGENER 12520 HAYZATA BLVO HINNETOriKA rtl 55343 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 17 72 35-118-23 32 0041 01585 HAYZATA BLVO H 0 TRUSTEES OF SHEET HETAL HORKERS BAYSHORE TONNHOHES INC C/O HAURICE J NAGENER 12520 HAYZATA BLVO HINNETOMKA m 55343 72 35-118-23 32 0044 01575 HAYZATA BLVO H A TRUSTEES OF SHEET HETAL HORKERS BAYSHORE TONNHOWS INC C/O HAURICE J NAGENER 12520 HAYZATA BLVO HINNETONKA W 55343 72 35-118-23 32 0047 01575 HAYZATA BLVO H 0 TRUSTEES OF SHEET HETAL NORKERS BAYSHORE TO»tlHOHES INC* C/O HAURICE J NAGENER 12520 HAYZATA BLVO HINNETOMKA M4 55343 '•'•5 fZ 35-118-2S 32 0050 01555 HAYZATA BLVD H A . TRUSTEES OF SHEET HETAL HORKERS BAYSHORE TONNHOHES INC C/O MAURICE J NAGENER 12520 NAYZATA BLVO MINNETONKA MN 55363 72 35-118-23 32 0053 01555 NAYZATA BLVD K D TRUSTEES OF SHEET METAL NORKERS BAYSHORE TOItIHOHES INC C/O MAURICE J NAGENER 12520 NAYZATA BLVO MINNETONKA MN 55363 72 35-118-23 32 0056 01565 NAYZATA BLVO H A TRUSTEES OF SHEET METAL NORKEI^ CHARLES J A VICKI A NAGENER tA 1565 NAYZATA BLVD N LONG LAKE ffi 55356 ■ ^ u - RUN DATE Oe/24/n ♦ • • f ■■ BATCN 004 PROP ADOR • • » I l ■ •. HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OFMERS LIST . 72 SB-110-2S S2 0057 01545 NAYZATA BLVD N B ONNER NAME TRUSTEES OF SHEET METAL NORKERS TAXPAYER BAYSHORE TQMMMES INC NAME/ADDR CA) MAURICE J NA6ENER 12520 NAYZATA BLVO MINNETOfACA IM SSS4S '' 72 S5-116-2S S2 0040 PROP AODR 01545 NAYZATA BLVD N E 0»tCR NAME TRUSTEES OF SHEET METAL HOf^RS TAXPAYER BAYSHORE TOMOMMES INC NAME/AOOR C/0 MAURICE J NA6ENER 12520 NAYZATA BLVO NINNETaraCA »M 5SS4S * I 72 55-11B-2S S2 004S 01595 NAYZATA BLVO N SOUTHNOOO SHORES T0HNH0U5E SOUTHHOOO SHORES TONNHOUSE NAME/ADDR C/0 DERRICK LAND CO 1450 SHEURO TONER ST LOUIS PARK »tl 55424 PROP ADOR 0»MER NAME TAXPAYER iA' ^ i f • V. : * •* • •••.. . C v - " • ii ‘ V ,r / , • A I • * ■■ . •:V .• • • .,%•? • ! . . ■ ••• i •. 1 i*, -5 I . ' . • • ..-r.V • > : . . . • ' . » *. •». • ..» •’. • i*'ri •'. . r., * !' • . > • •m.A' _• . \ 4 .-.V ' I f • ’ ;* :• « f' W . • • . . -if •, : ■. > •• » r» ■ ^ i’i I’* s'/ - *** ‘ ■1^ '# JMIL 72 35-118-23 32 0058 01545 NAYZATA 8LV0 N C TRUSTEES OF SHEET METAL NORKERS PATRICIA J BERNEY tC 1545 NAYZATA BLVO N LONG LAKE 494 55356 72 35-118-23 32 0061 01565 NAYZATA BLVO N F TRUSTEES OF SHEET METAL NORKERS BAYSHORE T0H4H0MES INC C/0 MAURICE J NAGENER 12520 NAYZATA BLVO MINNETOMCA MN 55343 72 35-118-23 32 0064 01585 NAYZATA BLVO N SOUTHHOOO SHORES TOF94HOUSE SOUTHNOOO SHORES TONNHOUSE C/0 OERRICK LANO CO 1650 SHELARO TONER ST LOUIS PARK 494 55426 » •REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 18 72 35-118-23 32 0059 01545 NAYZATA BLVO N 0 ■ TRUSTEES OF SHEET METAL NORKERS BAYSHORE TOF94HOMES INC C/0 MAURICE J NAGENER 12520 NAYZATA BLVO , ' MINNETONKA 494 55343 • • 72 35-118-23 32 0042 01601 44AYZATA BLVO N SOUTHHOOO SHORES TOF94HOUSE , , SOUTHNOOO SHORES T0494H0USE C/0 DERRICK LANO CO 1650 SHELARO TONER ST LOUIS PARK 494 55424 • '’i- i w • " TOTAL BATCH 006 00080 • ; .»«i. \. V.*■ i V.* > • I \V. . I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE . REPRESE44TATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEN44EPIN COUNTY DEPART^44T .OF PROPERTY TMtATION* TO THE/SEST OF 4IY KNONLEDGE AND BELIEF^/ /mm ?TC(Co -Oik i .• '1 DATE .* i »•* I. • I • ► A.'t i f *?: * 4 : ; ' .O' * ' •1 »F # .V ' # • • a' • i •• . <■ -.Vi^ ' . 1. J;. ’ v.,, r „W' K h r. \ Ki . JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITIES 0? LONG LAKE AND ORONO For the concurrent detachment and annexation of certain lands from the City of Orono and the annexation of the same to the City of Long Lake pursuant to Minn. Stat. S 414.061; and the stipulation of both municipalities t.hat neither will support future annexations by either municipality pursuant to Minn. Stat. S 414.061. RECIT.\LS WHEREAS, Long Lake has petitioned for the concurrent detachment and annexation of certain real property, described » in Exhibit A which incorporated herein by reference, into the City of Long Lake pursuant to Minn. Stat. S 414.061, Subd. 5, at saij.; and WHEREAS, Orono has opposed the petition of Long Lake; and WHEREAS, the matter is presG.ntly pending before the Minnesota Municipal Board, and currently scheduled to resume trial on November 25, 1991; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to amicably resolve the petition of Long Lake without further litigation allowing Long Lake to assume jurisdiction and Orono to enforce certain covenants after annexation; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Cities of Long Lake and Orono do hereby resolv'e as follows: 1. ■ That certain real property situated in the State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin, which is legally described in Exhibit A, and to which Long Lake holds title in fee should be detached from the City of Orono and annexation to the City of Long Lake. D I 2. That the City Council for the City of Orono finds that the above-described property now located within the City of Orono abuts the City of Long Lake and is subject to concurrent detachment and annexation by concurrent resolutions o£ the two council of the two municipalities pursuant to Minn. Stat. S 414.061. 3. That city council of the City of Orono agrees that the above-described property should be concurrently detached from the City of Orono and annexed to the City of Long Lake. 4, That the city council of the City of Long Lake agrees that the above-described property should be concurrently detached from the City of Orono and annexed to the City of Long Lake. 5.That this resolution is being adopted concurrently and jointly between the city council of the City of Orono and the city council of the City of Long Lake, Hennepin County, Minnesota^ approving such detachment and annexation as ^provided by law. 6. That both the city council for the City of Orono and the City of Long Lake requests the Minnesota Municipal Board to grant their request for the concurrent detachment and annexation of the above-described real property to be effective upon issuance of the Board's order or at such later data as provided by the Board in its order. 7. Tha- it la the desire of the City of Orono to covenant that it will oppose from this day forth the concurrent detachment pursuant to Minn. Stat. S 414.061 of any property 2. w r L 4 1' presently located within the City of Long Lake and annexation of said property into OrcnO/ and agrees that this covenant shall be specifically enforceable against Crcno by the City of Long Lake in any proceedings before the Minnesota Municipal Board, or any court of competent jurisdiction. 8. That it is the desire of the City of Long Lake to covenant that it will oppose from this day forth the concurrent detachment pursuant to Minn. Stat. S 414.061 of any property presently located within the City of Orono and annexation of said property into Long Lake, and agrees that this covenant ehall be specifically enforceable against Long Lake by the City of Orono in any proceedings before the Minnesota Municipal Board, or any court of competent jurisdiction. 9. That both the city council for the City of Orono and the City of Long Lake request that the Minnesota Municipal Board approve their covenants that neither will from this day forth support the concurrent detachment and annexation pursuant to Minn. Stat. S 414.061 of any property located within the jurisdiction of the municipality, and that said covenant shall be specifically enforceable by either municipality in any proceedings before the Minnesota Municipal Board and any court of competent jurisdiction to be effective upon issuance of the Board's order or by the court upon the issuance of its order. 3. ..A » Passed by "Che City of Orono this day of 1991. Barbara Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: , Clerk passed by the City Council of the City of Long Lake this __ day of __ _ _ _ _ _ _.( 1991. Betsy SwartwQod, Mayor ATTEST; LaVerne Hanson, City Clerk ’a'- CJD;QW8s 4 . if. ■ f SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Long Lake (Long Lake), a municipal corporation, located at 1964 Park Avenue, Long Lake, Minnesota 55356; and the City of Orono (Orono), a municipal corporation, located at P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323. RECITALS WHEREAS, on February 26, 1990, Long Lake filed with the Minnesota Municipal Board a petition for the concurrent detachment and annexation of certain real property, which is described in Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference, into the City of Long Lake pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 414.061, Subd. 5, sXl afiSJ*; and WHEREAS, on March 28, 1990, Orono filed its response in opposition to the petition of Long Lake; and WHEREAS, the matter is presently pending before the Minnesota Municipal Board, and currently scheduled to resume trial on November 25, 1991; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to amicably resolve the p©tition of Long Lake without further litigation. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows: 1. Long Lake shall forthwith file an application for rezoning and subdivision approval of the subject property with Orono for the development of thirteen (13) lots as described in » ■ iinaiif i«n’imaA ■■■ fTfll II .■k-.ia.UB.JlA.tekL, ¥ ¥ Exhibit B which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 2is part of the application for rezoniny of the subject property, Long Lake agrees to extend sewer and water to the subject property, which shall be chargeable against Long Lake's allocation for sewer and water units. 2.Upon filing of the application for rezoning and subdivision approval with Orono, Orono agrees that it will use its best efforts to expeditiously process the applications. Additionally, upon receiving all appropriate filings from Long Lake as an applicant property owner for subdivision, rezoning and comprehensive plan amendment, Orono shall commence its required procedure to file an application with the Metropolitan Council to amend the MUSA line and shall work with the Metropolitan Council to expeditiously process that application. Orono agrees to process all aspects of the rezoning and subdivision applications simultaneously with the processing of the application for amendment of the MUSA line with the Metropolitan Council. 3. This Agreement is expressly contingent upon the zoning approvals of Orono, and the approval of the amendments to the MUSA line by the Metropolitan Council, in a form that in thft Bolft judgment of Long Lake would permit the reasonable development of the thirteen (13) lots on the subject property Upon the granting of the zoning approvals of Orono, and the approval of the amendments to the MUSA line by the Metropolitan Council Orono shall contemporaneously complete and execute the Declaration of Covenants contained in Exhibit C and forward it 2. 'to:A r r:. r:\. t to Long Lake for execution along with copies of the zoning • • apprc”*!® ^r.ri 2pprcval of tho d...ciiaiiicac to the MUSA ixne. If Long Lake determines in its sole judgment, that the zoning approvals of Orono, the approval of the amendments to the MUSA line by the Metropolitan Council, and the completed Declaration of Covenants would permit the reasonable development of the thirteen (13) lots on the subject property. Long Lake shall execute tne Declaration of Covenants and cause the same to be recorded and proof thereof forwarded to Orono. 4. Upon satisfaction of all conditions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, supra/ and upcn filing of the final plat, the parties shall cause to be executed and delivered to the Minnesota Municipal Board a Joint Resolution in the form attached as Exhibit D providing for the concurrent detachment and annexation of the subject property from Orono into Long Lake pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 414.061, Subd. 5. 5. The parties agree that time is of the essence and "I ATTEST: L DECLARATION OF COVENANTS THIS DECLARATION OF COVENANTS is made this dav of , 1991, by and between THE CIT'/ OP ORONO, a municipal corporation ("Orono"), and THE CI*Y C.- -C.-.G i-AKr., a municipal corporation ("Long Lake"). RECITALS Long Lake is the fee owner of certain real property which is legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property"). The Property is currently within the city limits of Orono# It is the intent of Long Lake and Orono to bind the Property to certain zoning restrictions and conditions,^to allow the intended development of. the Property by Long i.ako. NOW, THEREFORE, In consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Long Lake and Orono agree as follows: 1, The Property has been rezoned by Orono to a classification of which allows the following uses: and is subject to the following conditions; 2. '’’he Property ha^s been replatted by Orono as . The Property shall be developed into no mere than. mmn (12) fllnole family lots, the configuration of which i set forth on Exhibit B attached hereto. 4. The foregoing restrictions shall apply to and bind each and every owner of any part of the Property and their respective personal representatives, successors and assigns, and ahall operate as a covenant passing with the title to the Property. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Long Lake and Orono have executed this Declaration on the above date. THE CITY OF ORONO i.tS Its ■ iMbfAk - -fwn ^^ A lA*. Ma a k A r '•a J ^ i t Maa.Ai A.i -* —ar F TH2 CITY OF LOMG LAKE Its Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this d»y of_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _1991- sy the and of The City of Long Lake# a e municipal corporation# on behalf of the corpcrationt Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA SS • COUNTY'OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before mo this dav of . 1991, by -- - - - - - - - - - - - -2 -- - - - - - and _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ of The City of Orono, a municipal corporation, bn behalf of the corporation. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED 3Y: LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGRSN, Ltd. 1500 Northwestern Financial Center 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 (RWL) RWLiCIOa 2. -- --a ^ ‘ *-'■ Wr^'rk'»> r. ^ *- - -- ^ J — ■* . i L EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property; All that part o£ the Southwest 1/4 or tH»e Southwest 1/*^ Section 35, Township 118, Range 23, described as follows; Comm«neln9 at a point 953 feat Nortii of the Southeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 35; thence North to the Northeast corner of said Southwest 1/4 o. th© SouthwQst 1/4; th^nc© West to the Nort44W0sc co-.ner of saio Southwest 1'4 of the Southwest 1/4; thence South to a point 13.30 chains North of the southwest corner of said Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4; thence southeasterly a..ong the center line of the Long Lake-Orono Road to a point 838 feet Northwesterly along said center line from its, intersection wi^n the south line of said Section 35; thence Northeasterly U11.8 feet to the place of beginning. All that part of Government Lot 2, Section 55, Township 110, Range 23, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the north line Oa. the right-of-way of the Great Northern Railroad (formerly st. Paul, Minneapolis and Manitoba Railroad) with the west line o- said Government Lot 2, thence southerly to a point chains north of the southwest corner of said Government Lot which point is the intersection of the south side of the right-of-way of the aforesaid railroad with the west line of said Goyornmenv. Lot 2; thence easterly along said right-of-way 7.52 cha-ns, thence south to a point on the south line of said Government Lot 2 and 7.27 chains east of the southwest corner thereof; thence east on said south line to the southeast corner thereon, thence north on the east line of said Government Lot 2, to its Intersection with the north line of said Great Northern Railroad, thence westerly along the north line of say- railroad to the point of beginning, excepting and reserving right-of-way of said Great Northern Railroad, all the foregoing land being subject to that certain highway easement in favor of the State of Minnesota described In Document No. 1588801, files of Register of Deeds, and that certain easement in favor of Great Northern Railway Ccmpany described in Document No. 2/4-QoO, Files of the Register of Deeds. That part of Government Lot 2, Section 35, Township 118, Range 23, lying East of the West 479.82 feet and southerly of the Burlington Northern Railway. RWL:Cl0a 3. £_ __ I j. f- s McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 15050 23rd Aven je N^rin. Plyrnoutn. Minnesota 55-147 Teiepr^one 612 476-5010 612 476-3532 FAX Engineers Planners Surveyors September 20, 1991 Staff, Planning Commission and City Council City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 C-l 1 •. .*1*L SUBJECT:City of Long Lake, Minnesota Orchard Pond Addition MFRA #7085 Ladies and Gentlemen: Included herewith are materials supporting a proposal for Rezoning and Preliminary Plat of the subject property, referred to as Orchard Pond Addition. Said proposal also requires a revision of the Comprehensive Plan and M.U.S.A. Line in Orono. The 25 acre parcel is currently zoned RR-IB (Rural Residential Single Family District - minimum 2 acres) and guided appropriately. The proposed zoning is R-IA (One Family Residential District 1 acre minimum). As is well known, the subject property is owned by the City of Long Lake and was formerly the site for the city’s waste water treatment facility. The treatme'-t facilities and pond were abandoned in the 1960's. Currently, the property has an MWCC Lift Station on the portion noted as "Exception" on the plan drawings. The balance of the site is unused except for a small part in the southwest corner which is used by the city for storage of various materials. A 16" force main runs from the lift station to Orono Orchard Road along the entrance road alignment. The City of Long Lake has wanted to annex and develop this oroperty for some time, and in July of this year, agreement was reached between the Cities of Long Lake and Orono which will result in this property becoming part of Long Lake. In their part of the agreement, the City of Oreno has agreed to review and approve this development prior to deannexation by Orono and annexation by Long Lake. Hence, this submission. The development calls for 13 one-acre lots, accessed primarily by a public street (designated Orchard Pond Trail) that will closely follow the current entrance drive in both grade and alignment. Orchard Pond Trail may eventually be extended north of the Burlington Northern Railroad. Two lots will orient toward Orono Orchard Road with building envelopes located on the high ground between the road and Long Lake Creek. An Eauai Opportunif/ Empiovcf Staff, Planning Commission and City Council September 20, 1991 Page Two i J -«b. The old sewage pond has been arained and currently resembles a naturally occurring wetlands area. In fact, it ‘.as been designated as DNH protected wetland #27-836W. With its open water, marsh grasses and wild life, it becomes the primary focal amenity to this proposed residential development. Most of the pond area would be contained in Outlot A, bordered on the west by Long Lake Creek and on the east by Orchard Pond Trail. It appears that minimal fill may be required along the western edge of the road but not to the extent that the wetland will be adversely impacted. The MPCA has been contacted as to any concerns they might have in this proposed development but, as of this writing, have not responded to this latest request. Previous testing and correspondence between MPCA and the City of Long Lake indicated they no longer had any concern or interest in the pond. The cul-de-sac (designated Orchard Pond Circle) is located in such a manner as to minimize disturbance of the slopes on the east central portion of the property. Such orientation also permits saving the large cedar trees whicn border the current entrance drive. Most of the lots (7) would be accessed from this cul-de-sac. Lot 4, Block 2 uses a "flag lot” arrangement from the cul-de-sac. The flag lot permits a more realistic access to the lot. even though it technically "fronts" onto Orchard Pond Trail. For this reason, we do not believe this lot will require a variance. The streets are planned to be bituminous with a concrete curb and gutter. They would be 30 feet wide back-to-back within a 50 foot right-of-way. Sanitary sewer would be routed to the MWCC lift station, except for Lots 1 aiid 2, Block 1 which would have their sewage conveyed west via sewage ejector pumps to an existing manhole. Water service would be provided from the City of Long Lake distribution system, from a point on Orchard Drive in the Orchard Meadow Subdivision. The watermain would be contained within public rights-of-way and utility easements and would eventually "loop" back toward Orono Orchard Road along the southern border of the Burlington Northern Railroad R.O.W. Drainage would be directed primarily from the potential building pads to the streets, and to the pond via a storm water collection system. Control of sediment rur..*f both during and after construction, from the development to the pond and from the pond to Long Leike Creek, would be provided in a manner acceptable to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed. Drainage to the east and south would not be increased, either in quantity or velocity, from the existing conditions. Standard, accepted erosion control techniques would be employed during construction until adequate vegetation is established. The only variance that appears necessary occurs on Lot 1, Block 1. The Orono City Ordinance requires 1/2 acre of dry, contiguous land for a building S 1 i ■ r* i I ■ r< I rnrrf' - rnrf - - ‘ ----------iM'JI r i iriri‘ iIfcni-- rrr.-i if « jmn.-r Jr -----rgifii I inTinri i i iPir i I Ate f I /AmAP ■6 Staff, Planning Commission and City Council September 20, 1991 Page Three ed' V ; u ^'•^.W I o;r* ••A--*—OUI 'L envelope. Without some alteration to this lot, only about 1/3 of ^^re is available above the wetland limits, as determined on September 13. 1991 by an on-site Inspection from Steve McComas, a limnologist from Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk and Associates. Jeanne Mabusth. Building and Zoning Administrator for the City of Orono and myself. We fee] this proposal rccurately represents the content and spirit of the above mentioned agreement. Further, we believe this development will not adversely affect the adjacent residential areas in Orono and Long Lake and in fact, be a positive addition to the neighborhood. We, therefore, request approval of the proposed Rezoning from RR-IB to R-IA, the Preliminary Plat for Orchard Pond Addition and Reguiding request. Please contact our office if you have further questions on this matter. Thank you. Sincerely, McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES. INC. David J. Squire 7 DJS.'pry Enclosures cc: LuVerne M. Hanson, Clerk/Treasurer, City of Long Lake Marv Wurzer, Public Works Director, City of Long Lake Christophfer J. Dietzen, Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. r February 13, 1985 GME COIUSULTANTS, IIUC. COMSULTIMG ENGINEERS 2083 East Center Circle / Mmneaooiis. MN 55441 / 612/559-1059 McCombs-Knutson Associates, Inc. 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 Attention: Mr, Fred Malueg GME Job No. 743 Preliminary subsurface exploration for proposed residential street and subdivision construction at the existing waste water treatment lagoons in Long Lake, Minnesota Gentlemen: In accordance with the authorization given to us by Mr. Fred Malueg, we have completed two soil borings for this project. Enclosed please find the soil boring logs and a report describing and interpreting these conditions. The borings were located in street areas based on the site plan submitted to us by MKA. The purpose of the borings was to obtain preliminary information on general soxl conditions within the lagoon. Because of the existing fence around the facility and the unknown depth of ice and water on the lagoons, we elected t-o drill the borings with manual equipment. Our original intention was to obtain split barrel samples with a modified Scunpling method, using a standard split barrel sampler and an 89 pound hammer. However, when we encountered deep organic soils, we proceeded- to advance the borings and obtain samples by the auger method in accordance with ASTM: D 1452. In the two borings drilled, we encountered 1.5 to 4 feet of ice and sludge at the surface, overlying frozen sludge and non-frozen sludge to depths of about 3,5 feet. Underlying the sludge in all the borings, we encountered black to dark brown amorphus and fibrous peat to depths on the order of 12 to 17 feec. At these depths we encountered a black silty sand. Because of the need to use the manual equipment, we could not advance the borings below this depth. Based on the soil conditions found in the borings, construction of residential units in the area will require excavation/replacement or the use of deep foundations, such as driven treated timber pil:.-s. As a preliminary estimate, the depth of excavation would have to be at least 16 feet and possibly deeper, depending on variations in the depth of the organic soils across the site. GEOTECHNICAL • MATERIALS • ENVIRONMENTAL SOILS WILLIAM C. KWASNY, P.E THOMAS P VENEMA, P E. WILLIAM E BLOEMENDAL. E I.T r. r Scale 100 200* Soil Boring Location Olagra® Proposed Subdivision Trtatwnt Hant Long Laae« Minnesota 6ME CONSULTANTS. INC. ms EAST Cf MTf R CinCLf AROUt. MNWffOTA tS44t KMH I WCK 2-12-aS _L«. .JkTAOI^tert-n.i ^ I •» t K k t Jni^ Vf GENERAL NOTES DRILLING & SAMPLING SYMBOLS SS ST PA OB AS J5 VS Split Spoon - 1 3/8** I D.. 2** 0 0.. unless othtfwist notfd Shtlby Tub# - 2” O.O., unless otherwise noted Power Auger Diemond Bit - NX: BX: AX Auger Semple Jer Semple Vene Sheer OS MS WS FT RB BS PM Osterberg Sempler — 3*' Shelby Tube Hollow Stem Auger Wash Sample Fish Trail Rock Bit Bulk Sample Pressurtmetif test - In siru Stenderd **N*' Penetration:Blows per foot of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches on a ? Lnch 00 split spoon, except where noted. WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENT SYMBOLS WL : WCI : OCI : WS : WO : BCR: ACR: AB : Water Level Wet Cave In Dry Cave In While Sampling While Drilling Before Casing Removal After Casing Removal After Boring Water levels indicated on the boring logs are f >e levels measured in the boring at the times irtdlcaftd. In pervious soils, the indicated elevations are considered reliable grpurui water levels. In impervious soils, the acairate determination of ground water elevetiont is not po»iblt in even aeve ai days observation, end edditional evidarKt of ground water elevations rmiit be aought. GRADATION DESCRIPTION & TERMINOLOGY: Coarse Grained or Granular Soils have more than 50% of their dry weight rareined on a ^200 sieve; they are described as; bouldefB, cobbles, gravel or sand. Fine Grained Soils have lass than 50% of their dry weight retained on a ^200 sieve; they ere described as: clays or clayey silts if they are cohesive, and sifts if they art non<ohesive. In addition to gradation, granular soils are defined on the basis of their relative in place density and fine grained soils on the basts of Chair strength or consistency, end 'hair plasticity. Major Component Of Semple Silt Range Descriptive Tarm(s) (Of Components Also Present in Sample) Percent of Dry Weight Boutdtrs Over 8 In. (200mm)Trace 1-9 Cobbtn 8 in. to 3 in. (2(X)mm to 75mm) Little 10- 19 Grwtl *3 In. to ]^4 slave (75mm to 2mm) Some 20-34 S«««d jtf4 to #200 sieve And 3S-50 I2mm to 074mm) Silt Passing 200 sieve 10.074mm to 0.005mm) City Smalltr then 0IX)Smm CONSISTENCY OF COHESIVE SOILS:RELATIVE DENSITY OF GRANULAR SOILS UfKonfined Comp. Strength, Qu^ tsf Consistency N - Blows/ft'Relative Density <0.25 0,25 - 0.49 0.50 - 0 1.00- 139 2.00 - 3.99 430-8.00 >830 Vary Soft Soft Medium (Firm) Stiff Vary Stiff Hard Vary Hard 0-3 4-9 10-29 30 - 4P 50-80 8CH Vary Loose Loose Medium Dame Danse Very Dense Extremely Dense - - i GME CONSULTANTS, INC. LOG OF BORING 2 PROJECT Proposed Subdivision OWNER K 1 SITE Treatment Plant Long Lake, Minnesota ARCHITECT-ENGINEER McCombs - Knutson Associates, Inc. ii C LU n5 < IHA IT 2Hi2 UJ s H < AHL 5HA HLU UJ U. uiOz < 5 s (O DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL r 2^ SURFACE ELEVATION, Ice and sludge Sandy sludge frozen to 2.5' Black peat, amorphous to fibrous - (Pt) Gray sandy silt and silty fine .sand - wet - (SM) End of boring at 12 feet Hand augered full depth WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS ^L.\/ 4 feet while samnlina WL WL ▼ 6 feet after boring CO UJ O 3 LU (/} Ql UJcn cc t $ O UJ D < > UNCONFINEO COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TCNS rr -o- 1+3 WATER CONTENT % STANDARD PENETRATION (BLOWS'FOOT) GME CONSULTANTS, INC. 2063 EAST CENTER CIRCLE MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA S5441 BORING STARTED BORING completed 2-12-85 RIG DRAWN KMH JOBA 743 DRILLER GM approved WCK SHEET 2 of 2 The stratification lines represerapproximate boundaries RMCr|pr.VIU LOG OF BORING 1 PROJECT Proposed Subdivision OWNER UJ s Ui I H UJlAJu. I < SITE Treatmeriv Plant Long Lake, Minnesota -I H ARCHITECT-ENGfNFER DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL McCombs - Knutson Associates, Inc, SURFACE ELEVATION, »- </)UJ K O D UJ (/)a ^ LO d u. $ C UJ D < >IZ UNCONPiNED COMPOESSIVE STRENGTH TONS F" -o- 1+ WATER CONTENT % STANDARD PENETRATION (BLOWS FOOT) to 20 30 ^0 50 - IAS r Ice and sludge 2AS 3AS 3’Gray sandy sludge - frozen to 2' 5AS 6AS 7AS ■ IIU 8AS 9AS calirw Black organic peat, amorphous to fibrous - wet - (Pt) 17' ■ Gray silty fine sand - wet \(drillers classification)y End cf boring at 17.5 feet Hand augered full depth WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS U 7 reet while sampling ^yTfppt aftpr hnring BORING STARTED ^^-85 GME CONSULTANTS. INC. 2083 EAST CENTER ORCLE MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55441 BORING COMPLETED 2-12-85 RIG DRAWN KMH JOB*M3 DRILLER GM APPROVED WCK SHEET 1 of 2 The stratification tines represent approximate boundaries between soil types: Insitu the transition may be fadual GME/tPC-1/84 .-AiA'.rLe* A. J CLT.'Vk. I ■.laAi. j i ■ y i UNIFIED SOIL CLA88IPICATION 8V8TBM Miiw«*WoM Oroop ■ymbolt Typical Wtll-gmM grw»l». prwikwid nriituTM. little or no tinea ?oorlv oreiM 9^'- unci ml«turea, little or no fJnaa Silty pravelt. prAwiMndeih rnlvTurtt Ctoyev grewelf, greaeNwrWev mixturtt Well^rtded aendt. •revelly aendh little or no finea 8 % P 1 I I mfi 8 PooHy gredMl aendi. grawelly I. little or no tinea Sltty andl. Mnd-tlH mlictucet Oeyey turea Inorgwiic alia and aery tine aendi. rock tioerr. alltv or day- •y fine aenda or dayey alia ewitn alipht pleadeity I Inorganic daya ot low to nw- dium plactidtv. growalty daya. aandy daya, ailty daya, lean daya Organic alia and organic dNy daya ot low piaatidty MH Inorganic ail8. mkaeaeiia or diaiomacaoua tine aaredy or ailty aoila, alaatie alia Inorganic daya ot Ngh piao" deity, let daya Organic daya ot medium to high plaaiicity, organic aiha Peat and other highly crginic aorh li |jiijiml nm ’oia®aa Not meeting all gndatlon fpqulmmana tdr OW Attartarg limiabaiow "A** line or PJ. tea dan 4 Atoao -Ar One aalth P.I. bataaaan 4 and 7 are Aon dPrt/na eaaaa repuirlng wa at dual aymboiaAttartarg llmltt atova **A** Una with PJ. graeta that 7 Dm fO»l^ Not meeting all gradation raqolramani* lor SW Attartarg Hmla below "A" line or P.l. lea than 4 Unda plotting In hatched sona aahh P.l, tatoaan 4 and 7 art eaaaa raquirinf om of dual tyfn* bolt.Attartarg llmiu aboae "A" Nna with P.l. graaw than 7 — for di I . ___Jficttion of f»i [22 froctlon of __gr«in«d tollt. Atttrbtrg Llffiltt plottlof lo* — hatchMJ ift* *rt bordiHIfii ~ftc»tiont rtquIHng u» of ^ ^ iyrnboit. — Equotloo of A-flnt: PI-0.73 (LL-20) I® I SI \—I- I ^ mmm••q if r LaidOL 7 OH mi mi 40 60 00 LIquIO Umll 00 r H t r '' \ I' • • L^-^LAul, MEMORANDUM ■ 7<^S5” TO: Long Lake City Council FROM: Jeff Roos, City Engineer DATE: August 1, 1989 Pace Laboratories has completed the analysis of the two soil samples taken from the abandoned lagoon at the Wastewater Treatment Plant site. The soils were tested for cyanide, the thirteen (13) metals on the "priority pollutant" list, thirty (30) "priority pollutant volatiles, fifty eight (58) "priority pollutant" semivolatiles, and twenty four (24) pestlcide/PCB materials. Of the 126 tests run, there were 118 in which no detections were registered. The eight which did register detections fell within the common range for these elements in normal soils. The only element which was noted to have an unusually high concentration was aluminum. It probably is the result of using alum in the treatment process. Aluminum is not a priority pollutant. ml limsia !!■ I Trank Roos Asaoclate6f Inc. M50 23rd Avenue Nortii LyBDUtb, Ml 55441 July 31, 1989 PACE Project HUnber: 890719511 its: Me. It mglake Barron ite Saiple(s) Collected: Its SaipXeCe) Received: 07/19/89 07/19/89 KCB Sanple MUnber: irweter gMSAMIC AMALYSIS (KVXOQAL PARAMETERS fanidtr Total m POLUTTANT LIST METALS-FAA BtiaoiV S V tamic As teylliwi?o Ci Gar . \ • .0* ^ f . 3. C • • 01 0 -i.i • VJ * • I O . N • ^.0 1*-^* - . V s ► • ■ A KBttQC ANALYSIS lain lOBitrlla rodifluoronethaneuiio ■name EOBOdichlorcBetbane 243510 243520 South North onita MDL Boring Boring L »j^ '4j lag/kg 0.50 ND ND ^ -ogAg 10 12 ♦12 # -ng/kg 1.3 1.6 #2.8 # /V /mg/kg 1.0 ND *ND « -k ag/kg 0.25 0,58 - cj'0.85 L. 5 ag/kg."2,5 8.0 y 8.5 aqAg 0.25 8.5 15 .7^ » :ngAg 2.5 15 # .13 4 - -> 0^ • %/agAg 0.02 ND ND ag/kg 1.3 14 .7 19 agAg 3.1 ND ND ^ .ag/kg 4.0 ND «ND # 0 agAg 10 to ND ■gAg 2.5 30 ' ^42 s ag/kg 6.2 ND ND agAg 3.1 ND ND agAg 1.2 ND MD a^g 0.6 ND ND agAg 0.6 ND HD . I Mot detected at or abofve the HDL. Method Detection Liait Data aubject to final review. ^ kk/kM : W-T *1. rk#-r-«. . . ii k fl Vkl^j k. Wtf i^Ol. .i '.1 -* tt • .'t .iJ A." .. ik. ai: V ni;> .Uti if >1 ---k -*--■- <■ Mr, Tom Barton page 2 July 31, 1989 pace Project Number: 890719511 PACE Sainple Number: Parameter organic analysis Units 243510 South MDL Boring 243520 North Boring PRIORITY POLUTTANT ORGANIC VOLATILES Bromoform Bromomethane Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane 2-Oiloroethylvinyl ether Chloroform Chloromethane Dibroroochloroinethane 1,l»Dichloroethane 1.2- Dichloroethane 1,l«Dichlotoethylene Trans-l 12‘-^ichloroethylene 1.2- Dichloropropane 1.3- Dichlotopropane E^l benzene Methylene chloride 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tttrachloroethylene Voluene 1.1.1- Trichloroetbane 1.1.2- Ttichloroetbane TrIchloroethylene Tt ichlorof luorcmethane Vinyl chloride PRIORITY POLLUTANT ORSANIC SEMIVDLATILES Benzidine bi 8 (chlor onethy 1) Ether 1.2- DiphenyIhydrazine mg/kg 0.6 ND ND rog/kg 1.2 ND ND mj/kg 0.5 ND ND mgAg 0.6 ND ND m^kg 1.2 ND ND rogAg 1.2 ND ND n»g/kg 0.6 ND ND m^kg 1.2 ND ND rog/kg 0,6 ND ND rogAg 0.6 ND ND roa/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND rog/kg 0.6 ND ND m^kg 0.6 ND ND rog/kg 1.2 ND ND rogAg 0.6 ND ND ing/kg 0.6 ND ND rogAg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mgAg 0.6 ND ND ro^kg 0.6 ND ND mi^g 0.6 ND ND mgAg 0.6 ND ND rogAg 1.2 ND ND rog/kg 1.2 ND ND ugAg 3200 ND ND ugAg 170 ND ND ug/kg 140 ND ND MD IfDL Not detected at or above the MDL. Method Detection Limit I, Ton Barron agt 3 July 31, 1989 PACE Pro"^vv” ’5ir»bor: 890719511 ACE S^U1ple Number; arameter Units ftGANIC ANALYSIS WORITY FOUJUIMH ORGANIC SEMIVOLATILES HUtrosodinethylamine 4 miio1 ds (2-chloroethyl)Ether Khlorophenol L f3-Dichloroben2ene L ,4^ichlotobenzene ,2-Dichlorobenzene )i8(2-chloroisopropyl )Ether Hiitroeodi-n-propylamine lexachloroethane lltrobenzene [sophorone l-Hitrpphenol 1.4-Diwethylpbenol >i B (2-chloroethoxy) Methane {^4*-DichIorophenol L,2,4-Trichlotobenzene i^thalene lexachlorobutadiene Khloro-3-methylphenol Itexachlorocyclopentad iene I, A, 6-Tr ichlor^henol ^<^oronaphthalene Dlnetl^l phthalate l^oeney^thylene 2# 6-Dinlt rotoluene Koenaphthene 2#4-01n1trophenol 4-Nitrophenol 2«4-^init£otoluene ND NDL Not detected at or above the MDL. jfethod Detection Lindt MDL 243510 South Boring 243520 North Borina ug/kg 74 ND HD ug/kg 68 ND ND ug/kg 91 ND ND ugAg 130 ND .ND u^kg 65 ND ND ug/kg 70 ND ND ug/kg 68 ND ND ug/kg 91 ND ND ug/kg 80 ND ND ug/kg 56 ND ND ug/kg 110 ND ND u^kg 120 ND ND ugAg 230 ND ND ug/kg 160 HD ND ug/kg 150 ND ND ug/kg 180 HD ND ug/kg 91 ND HD ug/kg 91 ND ND ug/kg 83 ND ND ugAg 160 HD ND ugAg 120 ND ND ug/kg 150 ND ND ugAg 91 ND ND ug/kg 65 ND ND ug/kg 75 ND ND ui'kg 91 ND ND ug/kg 81 ND ND ug/kg 50 ND ND ug/kg 51 ND ND ug/kg 75 HD ND J Mr. Tom Barron Page 4 July 31, 1989 PACE Projec± Number: 890719511 PACE Sample Number: Parameter Units ORGANIC ANALYSIS priority pqlhitant organic semivdlatiles Diethyl phthadate 4-Chlorppbenyl phenyl ether fIuor0n0 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol i^-Nitrosodlphenylamine 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Hexachlorobenzene Pentadilorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene Di-n-butyl phthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butyl benzyl phthalate 3,3-Dichloroben2idine Benzo(a)anthracene bis(2-^thylhexyl )Phthalate Chrysene Di*n-octyl phthalate 6enzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyi^ene lndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene Dibenzo(a,h}anthracene Benzo{g,b, Dpetylene OCHS SEMIVDLATILE ORGANICS PESTICIDE/PCB Aldrin a-BBC b-«BC MD HDL Not detected at or above the MDL. Method Detection Limit HDL 243510 South Boring 243520 North Boring ug/kg 120 ND ND u^kg 100 ND ND ug/kg 81 ND ND ug/kg leo ND ND ug/kg 120 ND ND u^kg 120 ND ND ugAg 120 ND ND ug/kg 930 ND ND ug/kg 100 MD ND ug/kg lOC^HD NO ug/kg 100 ND ND ug/kg 91 ND ND ug/kg 180 ND ND ugAg 180 ND KD ug/kg 180 ML ND ug/kg 160 ND ND ug/kq 300 ND ND ug/kg 200 ND ND ugAg 160 ND ND ug/kg 170 ND ND ug/kg 580 ND ND ug/kg 180 ND ND ug/kg 160 ND ND ug/kg 66 ND ND ugAg 160 MD ’ ND mg/kg 1.2 ND ND mg/kg 1,5 ND ND mgAg 2.0 ND ND • > LflBOKflTORIES. INC.TEL No.612 544 3974 Jul 3l,89 16:19 FT^/I Ir. Ttm Barron 'age 5 •July 31, 1989 PACE Project Number; 8907195H ^ Safac^le Number: irameter Units CANIC ANALYSIS JiS SEMIMDLATILE ORGANICS PESTICIDE/PCB ttC (Lindane) ilordau)e 4»-DDD 4»-nDE 4*-fiDT eldrin toeulfan I Sosulfan li tosulfan sulfate Irin >tachlor tachlor epoxide N1016 ^1221 *1232 -1242 -124a hl254 1260 NPbene mgAg ro^g rog/kg Not detected at or above the mdl. Method Detection Limit 243510 South MDL Boring 33 33 83 mg/kg 1.6 ND mg/kg 1.0 ND mgAg 33 ND mg/kg 1.0 ND mgAg 1.2 NDm^kg 2,0 ND mgAg 1.2 NDmg/kg 2.0 ND mgAg 6.6 NDm^kg 2.3 ND mgAg 1.0 NDmg/kg 1.3 ND mg/kg 1.0 NDmg/kg 33 ND mg/kg 33 ND ro^kg 33 ND mgAg 33 NDm^kg 33 ND ND ND ND 243520 North Boring ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND P "Lfl'iiOf ffTt)T^:l ^ rr IhZ 7 rabofoto TCC no T Client ___ 61^ ^44"o9r4 lul ~ri .89 16:^? P.(32 OtoriBS, he.Project Sub/det — Date. Sheet No. — Project No. \ A,.t tUILEd Ptmf<a B Be Be Br Cd Ce Q Co O 3 F Qe Qe HgU (ppm) 0.1-5.0 0.1-40A®-w1P0-.-J500 O.t-40 001-7.0 90-80 10-100 1.0-40 U Mn Mo Ml PO Be Rb 8b 8c 0.0-3000 0.3-2S 2.0-100 30-300 0.4—300 14)-80 801-OJ 18-5000 U_ enJuf !PHw 0.2-8.0 0.0-1000 2.0-200 10^-t^ »-800 0.8-10 10^25 0.1-zo 28- 60-1 0.1-12 0.0-9.0 20-500 10-800 10-300 00-8000 r-T.flrr - —ir. . . (Mice 'aboratories, nc REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Offices: Minneapolis, Minnesot Tampa. Florida Coralville, Iowa Novato. California Leawood. Kansas >s^ August 02. 1989 Mr. Tom Barron McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 15050 23rd Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 Dear Mr. Barron: Enclosed Is the report of laboratory inalyses ^cr samples received 07/19/89. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Susan D. Max Director, Sampling and Analytical Services Enclosures 1710 Douglas Drive Norih c Minneapolis. MN 55422 c Phone (612) 544*5543 an CQuBi opportunity employer 111 fan I ■ ^ . ooce. 'aboratories, nc REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS W • • • W r r : Minneapolis. Minnesota Tampa, Florida Coralville. Iowa McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 15050 23rd Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 August 02, 1989 PACE Project Number: Novato, California Leawood. Kansas 890719511 Attn: Mr. Tom Barron Longlake Date Sample(s) Collected: Date Sample(s) Received: 07/19/89 07/19/89 PACE Sample Number: Parameter lini TNORHANTr ANAI YCT<; INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS Cyanide, Total mg/kg PRIORITY POLLUTANT LIST METALS-FAA Antimony Arsenic Beryl Hum Cadmium Chromiurn Copper mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg Lead Mercury Nickel Selenium Silver Thai Hum mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg ND MDL Not detected at or above the MDL. Method Detection Limit J^DL 243510 South Rnr1ng 243520 North Rnr1ng 0.50 ND ND 10 1.3 1 .0 0.25 2.5 0.25 12 1.6 ND 0.58 8.0 8.5 12 2.8 ND 0.85 8.5 15 2.5 0.02 1.3 3.1 4.0 10 15 ND 14 ND ND ND 13 ND 19 ND ND ND Zinc flRHANTC ANAIY^T*; mg/kg 2.5 30 42 PRIORITY POLLUTANT ORGANIC VOLATILES Acrolein mg/kg 6.2 ND ND Acrylonitrile mg/kg 3.1 ND ND D1 chlorod1f1uoromethane mg/kg 1.2 ND ND Benzene mg/kg 0.6 ND ND Bromodichloromethane mg/kg 0.6 ND ND Bromoform mg/kg 0.6 ND ND 1710 Douglas Drive North - Minneapolis, MN 5S422 .. Phone (612) f>44-5543 an eouai ocpo'iunity employe' pocc. bboiotories, me REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Mr. Tom Barron Page L August 02, 1989 PACE Project Number: UltlCUb. Minneapolis, Minnesota Tampa, Florida Coralville. Iowa Novato. California Leawood, Kansas 890719511 PACE Sample Number: Paramptpr Uaiis ORryUmiANALYSlS PRIORITY POLLUTANT ORGANIC VOLATILES Bromomethane Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane 2-Chloroethylv1ny1 ether Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochlorcmethane 1.1- Dlchloroethane 1.2- DIchloroethane 1 ,l-Dlchloroethy1ene Trans-1,2-d1chloroethylene 1.2- D1ch1oropropane 1.3- Dkh1oropropane Ethyl benzene Methylene chloride 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethylene Toluene 1,1 ,l-Tr1chloroethane 1,1,2-Tr1chloroethane Trichloroethylene Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride PRIORITY POLLUTANT ORGANIC SEMIVOLATILES Benzidine b1s(chloromethy1)Ether 1,2-01 phenylhydrazine n-NItrosodimethy1 amine Phenol NO MOL Not detected at or above the MOL. Method Detection Limit MDi 243510 South Roring 243520 North Rnr1ng mg/kg 1.2 NO ND mg/kg 0.6 NO ND mg/kg 0.6 NO ND mg/kg 1.2 NO ND my/kg 1.2 NO ND mg/kg 0.6 NO ND mg/kg 1.2 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 NO ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 1.2 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 0.6 ND ND mg/kg 1.2 ND ND mg/kg 1.2 ND ND ug/kg 3200 ND ND ug/kg 170 ND ND ug/kg 140 ND ND ug/kg 74 ND ND ug/kg 68 ND ND 1710 Douglas Drive North c Minneapolis, MN 55422 - Phone (612) 544-5543 an eQu3t opportunity emptOirer eii s*..^ii ^ Mki .. t »*rrp , rv r* JW V iMVn S J At. -ft I M MMet.nn Mn r ■ pow. aboratories. rc REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Mr. Tom Barron Page 3 August 02, 1989 PACE Project Number: Minneapolis, Minnesota Tampa. Florida Coralville. Iowa Novato. California Leawood, Kansas 890719511 PACE Sample Number: Parampfor Units ORr.ANTr ANAIYATg; PRIORITY POLLUTANT ORGANIC SEMIVOLATILES b1s(2-chloroethyl>Ether 2-Chlorophenol 1.3- D1chlorobenzene 1.4- D1chlorobenzene 1,2-D1chlorobenzene b1s(2-chlorolsopropyl)Ether n-Nltrosodi-n-propy1 amine Hexachloroethane Nitrobenzene Isophorone 2-N1trophenol 2,4-D1methylpheno1 b1s(2-ch1oroethoxy)Methane 2.4- Dlchlorophenol 1.2.4- Trlchlorobenzene Naphthalene Hexachlorobutadlene 4-Chloro-3-methy1phenol Hexachlorocyclopentadlene 2.4.6- Trlchlorophenol 2-Chloronaphthalene Dimethyl phthalate Acenaphthylene 2.6- D1n1trotoluene Acenaphthene 2.4- 01nitrophenol 4-N1trophenol 2.4- D1n1trotoluene Diethyl phthalate 4-Chloropheny1 phenyl ether ND MDL Not detected at or above the MDL. Method Detection Limit MDL 243510 South Rnr1nq 243520 North Rnr1ng ug/kg 91 ND ND ug/kg 130 ND ND ug/kg 65 ND ND ug/kg 70 ND ND ug/kg 68 ND ND ug/kg 91 ND ND ug/kg 80 ND NO ug/kg 56 ND ND ug/kg no NO ND ug/kg 120 ND ND ug/kg 230 ND ND ug/kg 160 ND ND ug/kg 150 ND ND ug/kg 180 ND ND ug/kg 91 ND ND ug/kg 91 ND ND ug/kg 83 NO ND ug/kg 160 NO ND ug/kg 120 ND ND ug/kg 150 ND ND ug/kg 91 ND ND ug/kg 65 ND NO ug/kg 75 ND ND ug/kg 91 ND ND ug/kg 81 ND ND ug/kg 50 ND ND ug/kg 51 ND ND ug/kg 75 ND ND ug/kg 120 ND ND ug/kg 100 ND ND I I 1710 Douglas Drive North c Minneapolis, MN 55422 - Phone (612) 544-5543 an eo'jai opportunity employer L.: pocc hboratories. me REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Mr. Tom Barron Page 4 August 02, 1989 PACE Project Number: Minneapolis, Minnesota Tampa, Florida Coratville, Iowa Novato, California Leawood, Kansas 890719511 PACE Sample Number: Parampf'pr Unite nPHANTr ANAIY<;Tt; PRIORITY POLLUTANT ORGANIC SEMIVOLATILES Fluorene 2-Methyl-4,6-d1n1trophenol n-NItrosodiphenyl amine 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene Dl-n-butyl phthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene Butyl benzyl phthalate 3,3-D1chlorobenzid1ne Benzo(a)anthracene b1s(2-ethyl hexyl)Phthalate Chrysene Dl-n-octyl phthalate Benzo(b)f1uoranthene Benzo(k)f1uoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indenod ,2,3-c,d)pyrene D1benzo(a,h>anthracene Benzo(g,h,1)perylene GCMS SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS PESTICIDE/PCB Aldrln a-BHC b-BHC d-BHC g-BHC (Lindane) Chlordane ND MOL Not detected at or above the MDL. Method Detection Limit Mni 243510 South Rnr1ng 243520 North Rnr1ng ug/kg 81 ND ND ug/kg 180 ND ND ug/kg 120 ND ND ug/kg 120 ND ND ug/kg 120 ND ND ug/kg 930 ND ND ug/kg 100 ND ND ug/kg 100 ND ND ug/kg 100 ND ND ug/kg 91 ND ND ug/kg 180 ND ND ug/kg 180 ND ND ug/kg 180 ND ND ug/kg 180 ND ND ug/kg 300 ND ND ug/kg 200 ND ND ug/kg 160 ND ND ug/kg 170 ND ND ug/kg 580 ND ND ug/kg 180 ND ND ug/kg 160 ND ND ug/kg 66 ND ND ug/kg 160 ND ND mg/kg 1.2 ND ND mg/kg 1.5 ND ND mg/kg 2.0 ND ND mg/kg 1.6 ND ND mg/kg 1.0 ND ND mg/kg 33 ND ND 1710 Douglas Drive North - Minneapolis, MN 55422 " Phone (612) 544-5543 an eouai opportunity employer |>CI€C. aboratories. me REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Mr. Tom Barron Page 5 August 02. 1989 PACE Project Number: Minneapolis, Minnesota Tampa, Florida Coraiville, Iowa Novato, California Leawood, Kansas 890719511 PACE Sample Number: Parampfpr Units ORGANIC ANALYSIS GCMS SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS PESTICIDE/PCB 4,4'-DDD 4,4'-DDE 4,4*-DDT Dleldrln Endosulfan I Endosulfan II Endosulfan sulfate Endrln Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide PCB-1016 PCB-1221 PCB-1232 PCB-1242 PCB-1248 PLB-1254 PCB-1260 Toxaphene NO MDL Not detected at or above the MDL. Method Detection Limit MIL 243510 South Boring 243520 North Rnr1ng mg/kg 1.0 ND ND mg/kg 1.2 ND ND mg/kg 2.0 ND ND mg/kg 1.2 ND ND mg/kg 2.0 ND ND mg/kg 6.6 ND ND mg/kg 2.3 ND ND mg/kg 1.0 ND ND mg/kg 1.3 ND ND mg/kg 1.0 ND NO mg/kg 33 ND ND mg/kg 33 ND ND mg/kg 33 ND ND mg/kg 33 ND ND mg/kg 33 ND ND mg/kg 33 ND ND mg/kg 33 ND ND mg/kg 83 ND ND 1710 Douglas Drive North w Minneapolis. MN 55422 c Phone (612) 544-5543 an eQuJf opportunity emptover eciee. 'aboratories, nc REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS I • « W w < Mr. Tom Barron Page 6 August 02. 1989 PACE Project Number: Minneapolis, Minnesota Tampa, Florida Coralville, Iowa Novato. California Leawood. Kansas 890719511 The data contained In this report were obtained using EPA or other approved methodologies. All analyses were performed by me or under my direct supervision. Thomas L. Halverson Inorganic Chemistry Manager 7^ Dennis R. Seeger Organic Chemistry Manager 1710 Douglas Drive Nortr ~ Minneapolis. MN 55422 - Phone (612) 544*5543 an eQuai opportunity empfcyer II u I I iiflift r‘ aA. t 'A-iL ' e ?S5 • « • •• Ha 6052 olories,hc atom A^^Covslis Vt/ljjl: (l,^^„v CHAN-OF-CUSTOOY RECORD Anotytkoi Request Report To: Adtfrvss Bit! To: Pace CWem Mo. 0^3^ ^ ^ 1 Pace Protoct Manag er P PO # / Bining Refcn?fx:o Pace Prolect Mo Pfwne Sampled By (PHtNT): :ioV>J T>lcxsf.L\( Sampler Sign^ure lie Sampled (/)cc lijz Mf M \o zou u.o 64MPLE DESCRIPTION TIME MATBIX PACE NO.oz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ^of* tfjj * * • • • •%»»•% 120 0 »ioo S>.l \SA'i I Ptoicct Name/>to Lo^^Lu U-‘nwjipsted tXie Dnle PRESCnVATlVES Q 111vu i A tLLl if) UJ 1z # r- §<9 T D I X Qto. q \H *1 <1 ’inr COOtlRNOS •AllENS SHIPMENT MtIHOO inM OUT/OATI I RITURNtO/DATl NUMMR • «4 r| . • * • • * • • • • nELINQUISHEO BY / AF<IUAT10N . ACCEPTED BY / AFTILIATION AddHiortnj Comments As'U (ftv4 Tl f'pAA *f r • • -A •fl-.. . .r- TIME I . • • • •# # •••• I 1 ?i MitfaBlAl ■hum Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects Otto G BoofCOQ PE SCOf'T W PE Jcurph C PE V^rvtn L jcr.aa PE »<nanJ E Turner PE P Cocit PE Thcmjs E Nt?yrv PE PoOeT G ic^ur<r'!, PE Sovm M £^er/^ C PA KtxP A Gocjon PE PchjftJ W FojXff PE Dcy'JW C Bonjjnjt. PE A BcufOon PE Vj/k A Hamon PE T«3 K F^. PE r Rautmjr>n P? Pct-et P P'ffff'V PE D/vxj O icsuxXJ PE Th<XTVIS W P«PTC^ ®E Mchjet C L>T«cr> PE ft \Uana PE Kcnr'etfr p Andf^^on PE K*j'% P fio#! PE Pooeft C Puixk. AI % Thomai E An9ul PE Hc^artJ A Sjo^ PE j Edgtrrr PE K^jrk A 5fiO Pt PhiHp j Cjiwph PE ivna^ Marr/^;, PE Mi'k D PE Thomas P Arorrjcr' * Gary F P>iaroef. PE ft ,!«nseo, PE L Phillip Grjv^ ♦« PE Ppne C p'uT'aa A i A Agnei M AlC P Mry D fy<t«£n. PE Ceti^o OirviTf PE PPC^ P Ctooa PE Gan/ X' Vor^. PE njTn L W*r?nen. PE iCr'th R Yjpd PE Charges A E^oison Lpo M **/Ar i*y Harran M Qijn October 8, 1991 fL 1 OTYCF City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, KM r. c o O O ^ mJ Attention: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator Re: City of Long Lake Minnesota Orchard Pond Plat Wetland Delineation - Sept. 13., 1991 rocf ii 1991 Dear Jeanne: I would like to summarize the findings of our September 13, 1991 wetland delineation of the Orchard Pond site, and discuss the environmental status of the wastewater treatment lagoon on the site. The wetland outline was delineated, based on consideration of soil, hydrology, vegetation, and topography. The outline of the wetland/upland transition was staked by myself with input from Dave Squire, McCombs Frank Ross Associates, and Jeanne Mabusth, City of Orono, aru subsequently surveyed by a crew from McCombs, Frank Rons Associates. A map r,£ the wetland delineation is enclosed. The wetland soils are classified as a peaty muck (based on the Hennepin County Soil Survey (Pa - peaty muck)), and support vegetation that is dominated by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinscea). Reed canary grass seemed to delineate fe wetland area and .qeldeurod and ether aster species characterized upland areas. The transition from vocland to upland zreas was marked with a change in organic content of the soils. Wetland soils were peaty (highly organic) and upland soils had more mineral content, with Sv. "e sand found in the subsoil. In the wetland area, the water table was approximately 14 inches below the surface while in the upland area, it was greater than 18 inches. The map of the topography of the wetland shows a gradient with a high point of 944.95 near the Orono Orchard Road, sloping to 940.15 near the Long Lake stream. A potential building site to the south of the stabilization pond was also reviewed. This site, which formerly was a wetland area, was filled with borrow material around the time of the pond construction in the 1960's. There are no strong indicators now present that would characterize this area as a wetland area (based on hydrology and vegetation). The fill material at the site is a grey-brown sandy clay loam that is heavily mottled. This fill material probably was mottled when it was placed in this area. 210 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 • 35th Anniversary ■J Also located ot» this plat is an abandoned waste water treatment lagoon (sometimes lagoons are also referred to as stabilization ponds). The lagoon has not received wastewater since the Long Lake interceptor came on-line in the early 1980’s. Two soil borings were completed in the lagoon ia February, 1985 to depths of 12 and 17 feet and two sediment sam'^les from the lagoon were analyzed for organic and inorganic constituents in July, 1989. The soil boring results show black peat was the original bottom material in the lagoon, indicating the lagoon probably was constructed without a clay liner. Gray sandy silt lies underneath the peat. The peat permability is slow enough that the lagoon will be wet in years with average rainfall. The water elevation in the lagoon was 941.99 on September 9, 1991, which is above the elevation of the adjacent Long Lake Stream. On our visit of September 13, 1991, water level in the lagoon was below the surface outlet structure for the lagoon. If water in the lagoon ever rises above the invert of the outlet structure, water will discharge to the Long Lake Stream. The result of the chemical analysis for the two sediment samples from the lagoon do not indicate any problems with sediment contamination. Results are comparable if not better than what is found in some storm water detention basins. Results of testing for priority pollutant organic volatile, semivolatives, pesticides and RGBs showed all determinations were below detection levels. Inorganic analysis (which includes heavy metals) indicated sediment concentration typical for lake and pond sediments in urban areas. I made several contacts at the MPCA to ask about potential problems with property transfer Involving wastewater treatment lagoons. The contacts were; Mike Conley (297-1459), Property Transfer Group; John McQuire (296-8723), Municipal Permits Section; Doug Hall (297-1932), Industrial Permits Sections; and Dave Nelson (296-9274), Water Quality Group. This type of water body (a non-hazardous waste site, with no municipal, or industrial, or stormwater runoff entering, and a wastewater discharge permit that has been closed out) does not fit neatly into any single MPCA group. Basically, the MPCA does not require any further testing. It's my opinion, based on the non-industrial setting of the lagoon, and the fact that two soil samples do not show any unusual characteristics, (aluminum was elevated, but probably due to alum treatment) for typical stormwater detention ponds or wastewater lagoons chat the likelihood of serious sediment contamination is small and no additional sampling is needed at this time. Jeanne, if there are any questions or a need for additional information please contact me. Sincerely, BQNESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Steven R. McComas SRM:lk Glenn Cook, BRA David Squire, MFRA KJOKTW —-------------WETLAKJD L-lMlT^j (A* db TCRMIKIBO 9ji’^/90 © SPOT CL.E.VATIOKJS. Designed: I>Jt> Drawn:___P Dair. Wie/9> MfRA Na:«2QA&_ 29 90 lOO 200 PT. McCombs Frank Roos Assoclatas, Inc. 15050 JSretAveN Plymouth, MN 55447 6I2/47C-60I0 Engineers Pfanneci Surveyors W&TLAMD LIMITS ORCWARD POND ADD. 0C30NO, MIKJKJESOTA STATE OF u C.T; Jr CSC‘Ja b^HEdOW J ■3 DEPARTMENT OF N/^TURAL METRO WATERS, 1200 Warner Rd., St. Paul, PHONENO. 772-7910 Fi^E NO David Squire McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 15050 23rd Avenue North Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 September 12, 1991 RE: ORCHARD PONL PROPOSED PLAT, WETLAND 27-836W, CITIES OF ORONO AND LONG LAKE, HENNEPIN COUNTS Dear Mr. Squire; I have reviewed the proposed plat (and other documents attached to your August 26, 1991 letter) regarding the above-referenced project (SW i/4, Sect. 35, T118N, R23W) and have the following comments to offer: 1.The old sewage treatment site is DNR protected wetland #27-836W. (See attached copy of Protected Waters and Wetlands map). In addition, the creek from Long Lake is a DNR protected watercourse. Any activity below the ordinary high water (OHW) elevation, which alters the course, current or cross-section of protected waters or wetlands, is under the jurisdiction of the DNR and may require a DNR protected waters permit. It also appears that there are other wetlands on the site that would be subject to regulation by the U.S. Corps of Engineers (contact Joe Yanta at 220-0362) and the city. The OHW for the creek is defined as the "top of the bank." No official OHW has been established for wetland 27-836W. Please contact this office if there is any question about whether proposed activities will be within protected wetland 27-836W and we can make arrangement to estimate or officially determine, if necessary, the OHW. 2.Filling below the OHW (of DNR protected wet]ands/waters) for upland development is prohibited. Filling below the OHW for public roadways can be permitted only if: 1) the public need ru''.es out the no-build alternative, and 2) the alignment is the least impact alternative. It appears that the road proposed on the east side of (yr^ . - .the wetland will need toMj-elocated in order to avoid filling in wetland 27-836W. t 3.A significant portion of the site is within the ICO year floodplain district (a copy of the appropriate portion of the Flood Insurance Rate Map is enclosed). Any activity within the floodplain would have to be consistent with the floodplain regulations of both the City of Orono (contact Jeanne Mabusth at 473-7357) and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (contact Ron Quanbeck at 473-4224). For example, the lowest floors of the structures would have to meet the minimum flood protection elevation, and compensatory storage may be required for any filling within the floodplain. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER . -yik Mr. Squire September 12, 1991 Page Two (2) 4.The area within 300 feet of the creek or in the 100-year floodplain, whichever extends further, is subject to the City of Orono's shoreland management regulations. You should consult with the city regarding required setbacks, lot sizes, grading restrictions, etc. 5.As you've noted, there may be potential pollution from the abandoned sewage treatment facility. I would suggest contacting the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regarding the potential pollution. 6.If construction involves dewatering in excess of 10,000 gallons per day or 1 million gallons per year, the contractor will need to obtain a DNR appropriations permit. You are advised that it typically takes approximately 60 days to process the permit application. 7.Appropriate erosion control measures should be taken during the construction period. The Minnesota Construction Site Erosion and Sediment Control Planning Handbook (Board of Water & Soil Resources and Association of Metropolitan Soil and Water Conservation Districts) guidelines, or their equivalent, should be followed. 8.There should be some type of easement, covenant or deed restriction for the properties adjacent to the wetland areas. This would help to ensure that property owners are aware that the DNR and the Corps of Engineers have jurisdiction over the areas and that the wetlands cannot be altered without appropriate permits. 9.DNR protected wetland 27-836W should be labelled as such in future plans or plats and the OHW, if available, should be noted. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please contact me at 772-7910 should you have any questions regarding these comments. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please contact me at 772-7910 should you have questions. Sincerely, Ceil Strauss Area Hydrologist Enclosures cc:Jeanne Mabusth, City of Orono Ron Quanbeck, Minnehaha Creek WSD Wayne Barstad, Ecological Services MPCA City of Long Lake Joe Yanta, USCOE Orono shoreland file 4 1! ^fD O'- MINNEHAHA C^EEK WATERSHED DISTRICT P.O. Box 387, Wayzata. Minnesota 55391 BOARO of MHWWffI’ James fl. Soensieyi Pres. • John L Thomas • Picharo R. Miner Robsn 0. Ertckson • C. VAJoarw Love • Clarvson Unoiev • Thomas Maoie. Jr. err C-C ■» September 30. lls'U d E [k U Mr. David Squire McCombs Frank Roos Associates, In' 15050 - 23rd Ave. No. Plymouth, MN 55441 Re: rocr; 9 Development of Long Lake Wastewater Treatment Plant Site Dear Mr. Squire: As we discussed, the District is concerned that the development of the site which contains the abandoned Long Lake Wastewater Treatment Plant and discharge pond be developed in an environmentally sound manner and in accordance with District rules. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has several concerns regarding this site. District rules require that the rate of stormwater nmoff from the site shall not increase as a result of the proposed development. Please note Rule B3(h) specifies that all stormwater rate control facilities shall be located above the projected 100-year frequency flood elevation for the site. This criteria should be analyzed and met for runoff producing events of critical duration with return frequencies of 1, 10 and 100 years. The project shall cause no net decrease in flood storage compacity below the projected 100-year frequency flood elevation, .-^n analysis may be required to determine this elevation. In addition, alteration of any protected water requires a permit from the District under Rule D - Wetland Alteration. Information received from the DNR indicates that the on-site pond is a DNR Protected Wetland. An additional significant concern with this development is that the large on-site pond served as the discharge pond for the Long Lake Sewage Treatment Plant. Sediments in ponds of this type often contain materials detnmental to water quality. The District is concerned that discharge from this site not cause degradation of the waters of the DistricL Water quality information submitted for this project must include the effects of any proposed modifications to the site on Long Lake Creek incluaing the analysis of the affect of potential sediment, suspended solids, nutrients such as phosphorus as well as other chemicals, metals and compounds. As we discussed, the information you have submitted to the District does not fully address these concerns. Some options which you may wish to consider include: eliminate discharge from the on-site pond, removal of sediments from the on-site pond to prevent their discharge, or chemically or physically binding sediments to prevent detrimental affects of their discharge. r vv «• • I nroARTMFNiT 0(^ NA /t-C1 I^A:^ E SNNESOTA OEPARTMENT^t »^JI L' 'i'' '-^1 DIVISION OF WATER -—==- , .) 111 project ;— AT /XlWCXJftX------Lona_y^ Lone LrC. !jl\: WGZlISQl trW— ~27-150 Hennepin 87-115 PURPOSE : SURVEY nvestigation maintenance type; levels topography NOHW / OHW reconnaissance I I hydrographic work report Creek. On 6/26/87 the survey crew J°g"|;ations at the^outlet. downstream to investigation of the lake "i^^^|^°Sntrol fo^ the survey was from the Burlington Northern R.R. 9rade. = 972.508, NGVD 1929. use & GS B.M. "U 117" (located in NV.-SV, of Sec. tiev. Following are the elevations we found at the outlet: "At 6' X 8' concrete box culvert thru old Hwy. 12 Water surface, Long Lk. (no outflow) P?esent“KroSr(Uw°po1nt on rocks across upstream Lorpoirt^tTeMlns of possible old supporter the alleged metal plate across upstre-m end of culvert Upstream invert of culvert Upstream soffitt u^.A.:,n (B.M.) Top centerline of upstream headwall Centerline of old Hwy. 12 . . Top centerline of downstream headwall Downstream invert Downstream flowline Flowline at end of apron End of apron 943.24 943.48 944.0 943.9 943.29 949.21 951.15 952 .j 950.82 942.89 943.0 942 942.69 "At 4' X 6' concrete box culvert thru new Hwy. 12" Stain on upstream wingwall Stain on upstream wingwall Top centerline upstream headwall 7/13/87 n * T E John f-k/Senerek 943.9 944.7 950.08 S » C N c 3 Survey Cr0w T I T w C .MUbt Upstream soffitt Upstream invert End of upstream apron Top centerline of downstream headwall Downstream invert End of downstream apron rs * r> * ^9‘*o.hj 942.46 942.61 949.55 941.95 941.93 "At 72" CMP thru R.R. grade" Top upstream end (on bent lip) Upstream flowline Upstream invert Stain on upstream end of culvert Top downstream end of culvert Downstream flowline Downstream invert 944.82 939.1 938.80 941.1 944.18 938.5 938.28 We also obtained the following elevations on the staff gage on the left upstream winowall of the old Hwy. 12 culvert: Too of gage 945.53 Toe = 2.06 0^^ cf gage 943.47 During our OHW investigation we boated the entire shoreline of the lake and obtained the ground elevation at 8 trees (maple, ash, elm & oak). Based on the average reduced elevation of the 6 best trees, the OHW of Long Lk. would be 944.3. One of these trees, a 2.2' elm stump was 1<l0+ years old. recorded a recent beachline at 944.3 and distinct stains on the upstream wingwall of the outlet culvert at 944.1 and 945.3. . ■att. 11 m N,: 8^-: .>CJ -*■ " V 1 •.<pT,*. i V •! V w • « «. • «V-.r-> > V.f.’'*t- •> ■ t'rflb tA^'- .*• . . ^ r- ***cr**Vt^-*- 1 r-’v - .3. izzc qj: V:* *vH* ^ \ _■ * * L r !>i '*/ A 'crl \ w\ r •. ..J'•<r ■A_/ »•*.,AT'' r^i\7.^i ^' --<■». *»». .t7*«* ’•- ■.C>X -r«: SYZlS^^rp?l:>> *»■*■ <'- .*. •^y'*'-^ - f. rr -wTfck-. W.OC .-w . .'">• rX'-''V.-' -. O .T* ■ :v . - ^ • . ? ti • • >n*i=rr. ■• /c.r''■!/.' v rr:?7n'7~i:ii7.z"v^ —•;_. — Mo<?eLckt . ^»«^r_.■ - - — *- -» . V. .. t;*f^ " • -* ■'.:- -* . .-X- . —• «^v • - -f* '•••• * • rfjN- ^sr**''‘XV ^ ' ■* * '-** *"1 r •*' --*^ 2^ V •- -W • - 5 - ^ . i-• J '.'• A, % \ L'.. jw I i.. ' ^ ^ ^ -* % %3* « k r^3-' - -.V ^ • * ■*“ ' • — kj. 3^-T!*._r »T^ u£32^^^r;5Alj5r't*-'^' ■*. •ar^ " •'J"' *'■; ■ - • r •>' •- 1 fc.i^.:-c »\ *. •> %* • N ^1.- \ \ ■ - 'X> r-»X\0^ -.'^ »• *N» r*. "- • 1 — .r» J . i '• ^ r LONG LAKE T « ’ • I ^ • ' 't -rt ';- >..--':r ! _ •. '■\r' .•..•-■•'■• waHw/vlf 1? sMMMrcia L ^SfHutu ; HtGHbENSITV V 1,.^ residential >' WWlMin^^ nr \ RE$lbENriAL 3 UN-/AC. k 1. H«f ttu.M -/ INM PROTECTED WETLANDS CITY PROTECTED WETLANDS & SOILS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 1 UN. 2 AC. SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS ORONO, MN. Q LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 1UN./2AC. ' ------- i < MAABH -• _ L_ I 1. J'-. ••nt Nil .«».>**f CONCEPT PLAN CITY OF ORONO.MN. •OUTK,T« t V .r > li. ttmm»%A%4 nr<* am ■«rt»a> A «f t,*i« >•*••• « 0tm mr • « '^-•rTTT'^ U ■* - ■ ;*• \ y . . • -AU'i‘■I'M f i .--j ..'h- ‘v v*\ *. ./■•:/% * * • V<v t * ‘ - SUMMARY nASrO ON Lf GAL Df SCRIPTTON BASf D ON OAAW1NO S*3PPt«0 ST iOHZ LAi^P TOTAL LOT ARf,A T.083.296 SO FI (24 f AC )I^JS.aM AO. FT (237 AC) LIf T SIAflUN 25730 SO FT (6 AC )25730 AQ. FT.i-i AC ) OUTLOT 44 640 SO FT (1 AC )44 640 AO. FT.(1 AC) T’ONO 265.381 SO FT (6 1 AC)252,496 AO. FT.(5J AC ) no W 38.905 SO FT. (.0 AC )36.905 ta FT.( • AC ) LOTS T«T1 708 6B0 SO FT (16 3 AC )671.925 SOFT (15.4 AC ) • -•• */.* :*•• •* V. •:V ; :V ‘ ia '•.v<: v\*/■; 1Cv.\\V-^ .s »*»ic • JMi T*. t**r«r»ir<n^ , «* -r ■ -'. * --tnvl •—t •. T r-«-r^i-«i th K f •i . ■•• ■•■‘ ■. ■•;.■ i * * . . ‘ I X • •. . ' i. • • ■ - L ♦*•. • * • I ' ». » --f^r •. 1 ■■_i—Art'?”'"’*' 8 1* ■'• ' • ;-■=.' '•'..’.VvlVi " *■*'* ..1»* « V*t I **• ■ *•* f *:? - ■.... • • •! • * iC» *' ' '•, > »/ - .; •• .■)>’■ t •> I '. '■ ._ ^ w^-.1. . 't. caonriLnr-J sn r To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Otono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Moorse From:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: October 17, 1991 #1695, Thomas and Alice Stuck/John Bauer, 4345/4365 North Shore Drive - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Request for Variance to Moratorium Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IB, Single family lakeshore residential, 1 acre, sewered Application - Request for subdivision of a lot line rearrangement to increase the size of the Stuck property and place existing garage within property boundaries. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Subdivision Application Moratorium Variance Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Moratorium Ordinance Discussion Mr. and Mrs. Stuck recently were approved for hardcover and side setback variances for an addition to their existing residence. That variance limited them to the pre-existing percentage/square footage of hardcover in the 250-500' setback zone. Because of this, applicants were not able to do quite as extensive an addition as they wished. During the discussions with Planning Commission and Council, the question came up as to whether additional land could be purchased to increase the size of the property. At the time of the variance application, that was not feasible, but they now have arrangec with the adjacent property owner tc acquire additional land. The additional acreage would presumably accomplish two goals of the applicants: . . 1. Place the entire detached garage within their property boundaries, creating a 10' setback for that garage from the lot line while leaving a 10' setback from the lot line to the neighbor's garage. Increase the area of their 250-500' zone such that they can construct their entire proposed additions without exceeding the pre-existing hardcover percentage. 2. Zoning File #1695 October 17, 1991 Page 2 In order to accomplish their second goal, applicants technically also are requesting a revision of the previous variance approval to allow an additional increment of square footage for their addition, although the percentage of hardcover in the 250-500' zone actually decreases due to the gain in lot area. Applicant's original proposal was for 5668 s.f. (68.4%) hardcover. They were limited to the pre-existing 5488 s.f. (66.2%). With the added lot area and accounting for existing driveway and the 180 s.f. portion of the proposed declc addition which they again wish to have approved, the proposed final hardcover is 5794 s.f. or 58.0% of the new 9995 s.f. 75-250' zone. Variance to Moratorium By definition, this lot line rearrangement is a subdivision and technically requires a variance to the subdivision moratorium in order to proceed. The moratorium ordinance in Section 5 states that the City Council may grant a variance to the moratorium if a number of conditions are met; 1, Proposal must not be contrary to the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal must be compatible with the zoning and official control amendments being considered by the City. The proposal must promote the health, safety and welfare of the citizens. The failure to grant a variance would create a hardship for the applicant. 2. 3. 4. Unlilce a subdivision to create new lots which would potentially be subdivided under one set of regulations and then be subject to different regulations at the time they are built on, this lot line rearrangement involves two developed properties. Regardless of what new ordinances are adopted through the Shoreland Regulation review process, these two residences will still be here in a pre-existing developed state. The Shoreland Regulations proposed will not alter the issue of a side setbacl?, and while hardcover regulations may change, the lot line rearrangement only makes the hardcover situation better for the Stuck property and has little or no effect on the Bauer property. The Stuck property will become more conforming in lot width and area than it is today. The Bauer property will still meet the 140' width-1 acre area standards for the LR-IB zone. It would seem that there may be no purpose served by denying a variance to the moratorium. Zoning File #1695 October 17, 1991 Page 3 Reconnnendation Options The Planning Commission should consider the following options: 1. Recommend approval of the moratorium variance, approval of the lot line rearrangement, and approval of a revision to the previous variance approval allowing the extra 180 s.f. of deck to be constructed, resulting in a 250-500' hardcover decrease from 66.2% to 58.0%. 2. Recommend approval of moratorium variance and lot line rearrangment, table/modify/deny request for additional 180 s.f. of hardcover. 3. Recommend denial of moratorium variance. 4. Table for additional information (specify). 5. Other. CITY OP dRflNO --SfTBDf^ISlON'^SPPLICATIONv5''^'^'^rr/::;L‘:5;vTPcr:z)V5 7 7/7 - a 3-%m2^ PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address o P-t K_ _P ^■■- .i.D.) nn -H3 -Qo i ? .............. .. .. \in I I U'» Ui'UItUrr;i,';,rr !~ccjrc , wi > f 41 f r.'i »MOi»^ tafw/Vii.W'V V vv ,“»f rr*i T."ii*i A/) L/V TT ..mi aa-« Ml . Property Identification Nuraber (P.I.D.) G1 ^HJ ~ d - ^^2—LiS^/ i lU\/1 txUx AO /•“ 7/:v» / / »;. f / .Please check one - Property abstract or Attach legal description to application. torrens? Phone V ^ ST ~~ V 5~ V-S _ Phone f>^eS^) V*7(3~~^43^*7 applicant NameT'Ao r».tS 4* flt/ce. ------------ tJ-g-tk City: 0^0N' °_ _ _ OWNER (if different than applicant) 5a rf\<_ Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address:City:Zio: (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number-of Tax Parcels Development Size Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check)Residential; no. of units Other (specify)^____________ 2TK0 Present Zoning ni gi-rict 4 ^ 6> ■ROPOSAL X Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites 2-Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Units per Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land ___ Residential Other (specify) m If. m. .r..“Lrtr;=n^’Ywrt2Ja^T*.r-:rrz>f»t«i.-ilu»*^Aii-iAir «t m ••• •,1 I tf <1#^ vm W nr'M^CT-49!^ r MUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION Completed Application Form ^ must obtain Govt Center As^an^aVd ’endum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date IT pI^ent”of”fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal pxat. 3. Title opinion. 4, Easements, Covenants, etc. 5, Developers Agriement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Flat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature Date FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II s III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement $150.00 250.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision)250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential)300.00 + 20.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all inforriation required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, ^^Aty. _*ttor y. L'krUfs^Vo^°pa/"at l^r^llonarfeef e^Lb^^^ bl^lrd^^in^e^^- Applicant's Signature Date Owner's Signature X J ,ylu.Date / V .pplicant must have al'l submittals into the City offices 25 days before the ’lining Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the ihird Monday of e_ach ,_Appl_ica_nts_must Review meetinqs of the Planning Commission and Council unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Buildi g - g Office of this change prior to the meeting. Name H 9>lnr.k. OWNER Address . ^ (if different than applicant) Phone (home) Phone (work) 79s~y5*V-^_ Zip; ^ Name Phone (work) Address:City;rr 1 o •4hJ ^ U' • Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District LR~lA Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in Estimated Construction Cost $, VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Setback Variances (-------- Front Mr- 9^1 ___ Hardcover Side _____ Rear) Other / />^f / ¥ HARDSHIPDescribe undue hardship or pracrical cifficulp- resulrir.o frcr, srrrcr enforcement of zoning regulations 1 y P ' t r.-7 k.rnj! JVd <n .1t-^y\irr¥ i LH ~t Jir'ti / 1J H l~l LO. ----------------—— n^<;rwTPTTON OF UNCISDAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS describe unusual proper-.-/ conditions preventing conpiianoe with .oning Code Requirements: REQUIRED SOBMITTALS" 2- cer^ifl^d Xtrf/owners” List of owners within 150' (you must obtain thL list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). .. 3 Plat Map (obtained with property owners Irst.). 4! certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8. . 5. "o^fraphir ’survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8 . . , 6. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation of 7. AS an addendum to this application, please attach a any other persons you wish notified of tnis application. 8. .Additional items as may be requested by City The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this remember that vour variance application is not complete if the above inforTwat-ion has not been included. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ?^f™I=anr^^by agrees to provide all requested by Zoning Administrator ^nl^r^consiltant expenses In^”:rrerin°r7vYet o^ th^’a ”/puLMo'’n; and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best or his/her know.edge. {ZA Date ?Tfwnef:r^y ackowledges and agrees to this -vestiga. tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature /T.>'7/7 ^ - - --- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- AppIican7mus7h;7e'riTVuTm"t^^^^^^ into the City he\^d°on tile Planning Commission Meeting, present at all scheduled third council. If an applicant is review meetings ot tne j^ia^xuy mak-(» arranaements to have an unable to attend a scheduled meeting, P advise '-he Building & Zoningauthorized agent attend in your place and to advise .he Buiioing Office of this change prior to the meeting. X J ”U 4c- 8 •6 i ( I) f:\ ':• v'llil 'X W *> I ' 5 ^ , £^ 9 1 1 ( 3T\ I -^^..^Ta rv•s ?> (4) ; (•:) X r») 5 .s inr % •. 41M ei (*^5) c ?4^85 .1• \ ' -k ~\ \/ •* \ ., \'^ \\ JcO V* I \' L V*^-------- 2 '3 41 m y 1 y (31 \/ «*fS(37) (^ z' v> r 0 v_ V’V‘ (.V) < ' //< (I) ■j.-/^/f'^- ’vO' 9 (•«0) T% 5^ \ \ 1^ I \ o^\..^\..«^\..e^\..wa.l. yfl \iC,, I / • // V :/ \ \ \ \- \ w; - ^AAr OF SACA MIU ^ww s 23 ^ 5^/ ^ 1 ^ CMOil1 X (;i) I CJ o.50 1 »6 % ,-n ^ / /^ r RUN DATE 09/24/91 CATCH 001 .*•PROP ADOR 0V4NER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR r PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR r PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR r r PROP ADDR OHT4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP AODR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER riAHE/ADOR I • % r. 38 07-117-23 34 0001 04423 NORTH SHORE DR J A HILLER & E N MILLER JOHN A MILLER ELIZABETH N MILLER 4423 NORTH SHORE OR HOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 42 0023 04300 mRTH SHORE DR THEODORE 0 METZ & HIFE THEODORE I MARY J METZ 4300 NORTH SHORE DRIVE MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 42 0039 04340 NORTH SHORE OR MARVIN E SEIDOLD TOD M SEIDOLD 4340 NORTH SHORE OR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 43 0018 04395 NORTH SHORE DR K 0 HARDEN A R A HARDEN KENT D HARDEN 4395 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 43 0028 04315 NORTH SHORE DR RAM HILLIAMS RICHARD J HILLIAMS 4315 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 • \ •» HEWEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWr^ERS LIST 38 07-117-23 42 0007 01375 VINE PL DEf^NIS D LAMDON DEmiS D LAr4UOr4 1375 VINE PLACE Mourm m 55364 38 07-117-23 42 0024 04330 fKDRTH SHORE OR DAM STRELOH DOUGLAS A MAI LENE STRELOH 4330 NO SHORE DR rKXJNO m 55364 38 07-117-23 42 0040 04380 NORTH SHORE DR HILLIAM T SCHOEfiirJG HILLIAM T SCHOENIfK; 4300 NORTH SHORE DR MOUrm MN 55364 30 07-117-23 43 0019 04365 flORTH SHORE DR T E A 7 M STUCK THOMA f-: A ALICE M STUCK 4365 NU •H SHORE DR MOUND m 55364 TOTAL BATCH 001 00013 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 1 38 07-117-23 42 0008 01375 VINE PL DEriNIS D LANOON DEmiS 0 LANOON 1375 VINE PLACE MOUtJD rU^ 55364 38 07-117-23 42 0037 01360 VINE PL EARL B A GAILENE EARL 8 A GAILENE 1360 VINE PL J rK)RWOOD J NORHOOD Mourio m 55364 38 07-117-23 43 0017 04415 NORTH SHORE OR 5 N GETTERLUND ETAL MRS FRANCES D SETTERLUNO 4415 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 I 1 38 07-117-23 43 0020 04345 mRTH SHORE DR H R A L BENSOT4 JOHN M BAUER 4345 NORTH SHORE OR HOUND MN 55364 I • * . . OflDINAriCE NO. 96.2nd Series ■4. ' AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN . • INTERIM MORATORIUM ON THE GRANTING OF LAND SUBDIVISIONS THAT HAVE NOT RECEIVED PRELIMINARY r APPROVAL FROM THE CITY.• • • • • • • « I THE CITY OF ORONO ORDAINS; ' The KAinicipal Code of the CiN oI Orono it amended by adding Ordinance No. 92:2nd Series: - •• ■ SECTION 1. Statement of Policy The City CounciL finds that the City is presently faced with the potential of applications for subdivision of land within 1,000 feet of takes and 300 feet or the flood plain of certain tributaries within the City limits. The City is in the process of studying and preparing comprehensive amendment of its shoreline regulations. The City Council finds that there is an overwhelming probability that shoreline regulations will need to be updated and revised. The City CoundJ also finds that such amendments cannot be accomplished until further study has bean competed and a hearifM held. Since enactment of such amendments wiB ur)doubtedly modify existing regulations concerning subdivision of land, the processing of applicaoons during this interim period would be detrimental to the effectuation of proposed standard amendments and contraiy to the purpose of the zoning enabling act, Minnesota Statutes 4S2.3S1. et seo. The City Council further finds that it would be unwise, improper, and urriust to allow individual development to ir durino this studv oeriod and would allowoccur during this study period and would allow discrimination and unfair advantage to a lew to the detriment of the entire City. Therefore, the City Council finds it necessary and appropnate to adopt an Interim Ordinance pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 462.355, SuJbd. 4. SECTION 2. Restrictions on the Granting of Siihdivision Aoplirationn No land subdivision applicaoons, except tor those that already have received preliminaiv approval plication of a propertyand for a subdivision application Mvamed by a settlement agreement between ffte Cities of Lono Lake andCities of Long Lake and Orono, shall be granted for any purpose that would be inconsistent with the applications as of the date of adoption of this Ordinance and to any stA)sequent applications. SECTION 3. Restricted Area The oortion of the City of Orono that shall be S;A>ject to Ihe restrictions of this Ordinance is atf the land contained within the area deeaibed as follows: • AIT properties within the City of Orono located within i .000 feet of the Ordinary High Water Mark of the following lakes: take Minnetonka and associated bays and •w . > All properties within the City of Orono located within 300 feet or the flood plain of the foltowing tributaries: ■ ' •• Painters Creek (Sections 30, 31 Til8N R23W) "Stubbs Bay Creek* (Sections 32, 33 T118N R23W and Sectio.-'s 4, 5 Tll7N R23W) •Dickey Lake Creek* (Sections 27. 34 T118N R23W) ■WolsfeldfHoly Name Creek* (Sections ' 26.27.3ST118N R23W) ' ' ' Long Lake Creek (Sections 34 35 Tl 18N R23W and Sections 3.10 T117N R23W) •Forest Lake Creek* (Sections 6. 7 Tl7N R23V\^ ECTION 4. Duration. This ordinance shall be effective for a period nf one year, unless the City Coundl determines that it is no longer required because the requisite studies have been completed and adopted and that appropriate evaluation and action, including any necessary revisions of the Zoning Code, have been finalized..The duration of this Ordinance may t>j extended by adoption of a subsequent ordinance, for a total additional period of eighteen months. SECTKION 5. Variances. The City Counal may grant a variance to this Ordinance if the City Council finds after careful review of all the facts that a proposal is not contrary to the intent of the Comprehensive Plan, that it is compaoble with the zoning and offiaal control amendments being considered by the City, that it promotes the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens, and that a failure to gram a variance woul<^ create a hardship fcr the applicant. SECTION 6. froarablitv Every section, provision, or part of this Ordinance is declared separable from every o*her section, provision, or part: and, if any secDon, provision, or part thereof or action taken hereunder shall be held invalid, it shall not affect any other sect)on,^oyi»on, or part ION 7. Effective Date Thi.t Ordinance is effective upon adoption by the City Counal. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on the 26th day of August. 1991, a wrte of 4 ayes and 0 nays. . ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk : Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)” Lake Katnna Lake Classen Dickeys Lake Woisleld Lake Long Lake Lydiard Lake Mooney Lake Hadley Lake Tanager Lake French Lake Forest Lake V *, 1*.-. Th# foregoing insrrument was acknowledged before me on this day Aiigust. 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson and Dorotfiy M, HaJlin, f^yor & City Clerk of tfe Ciry of Orono, a Minnesota municipai corporation and said Instrument was executed on behalf of the City. •I. ., Noary Public (Published in The Laker and Pioneer Sept. 2. 1991) •r . L Affidavit of Puh State of Minnesota. County o( Bill Holm, being duly sworn, or an authorized agent and empic of the newspaper known as THE nesota, and has full kr.ovzledge Stated below: A.) The newspaper has compile ments constituting qualificati newspaper, as provided by 331A.02, 331A.07, and other amended. iJuB.) The printPfl f^LknUldf}. t'inhrio]I which is attached was cut from newspaper, and was printed anc week for____ / It was first published Mondi the _i2_i±r day of and was thereafter printe($l Monday, to and including M the day of KPJSTI HCL hotary pubuc - m HENNEPIN COl My oommlsston exp'tt Subscribed and sworn to me c day of By: 3. To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Moorse From:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:October 16, 1991 Subject:#1626 Eric and Kristal Wilson, 2683 North Shore Drive Variance Revision - Referral from the Council Disscussion This item was originally reviewed as a proposal by Tim Traff for lot width, lot area and side setback variances to construct a new residence to replace a pre-existing house. The City Council in Resolution No. 2960 granted the area and width variances and allowed a portion of the residence to be 24.5' from the side lot line. Traff sold the property to the Wilsons, who are proposing a somewhat different house than the Traffs. Staff determined this needed Council review because it was a significant change from the original Traff proposal. Council at their 9/23/91 meeting referred this to the Planning Commission for review. Since that meeting, applicants have slightly revised their proposal to decrease the area of structure that will encroach into the side setback. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D 10/14/91 Letter of Request Currently Proposed Site Plan, Construction Plans, Elevation Views Notice of Council .^ction 9/23/91 Memo and Exhibits of 9/18/91 Pertinent Facts - 1. In the Traff proposax approved by Council, a two-story portion of the house with a 150 s.f. footprint was allowed as close as 24.5' to the side lot line. 2. The original Wilson proposal to Council included 320 s.f. of footprint encroaching past the 30' setback line at a 24.5' setback. The majority of this was in the east wall of the attached garage. 3. In the revised Wilson plan now under consideration, the encroachment of house/garage footprint is reduced to 150 s.f., and the setback of both the house and garage appears to be 27' from the east side lot line. Zoning File #1626 October 16, 1991 Page 2 4. In this plan, the house has been reoriented at an angle irore consistent with the Mitchell residence to the west, with the garage angled to parallel the east lot line. The expanded site plan submitted suggests the spatial relationships between the houses in question. 5, A grade level patio is proposed to be located at the southeast corner of the house, and at grade level is not considered an encroachment on the side setback. Discussion The applicants have advised staff that they have discussed this proposal in some detail with both neighboring property owners, and the neighbors do not object to this revision. There is no encroachment of the average setback line as defined in Resolution No. 2960. ^ The applicants propose no hardcover in the 0-75' zone, and have designed the walkways, patios, driveway and house/garage to meet the 25% hardcover limitation. Lot coverage by structures is held to approximately 8% of lot area. In general, the new proposal does not exceed the square footage of encroachment allowed by Council with their original Traff approval. The layout of that encroaching square footage has been changed from a massed two-story encroachment to a more linear one-story encroachment. The Planning Commission perhaps should consider whether the apparent 3'x40' encroachment of the one-story garage is more or less intense than the two—story portion of house that encroached with Traff's original proposal. The applicants are aware that Planning Commission's recommendation on the Traff proposal was a vote of 3 to 1 in favor of approving the lot width and variances and denying the side setback variance. The Council determined that Planning Commision review of the revised proposal is appropriate, and suggested that the Planning Commission recommendation be brought forward immediately to the October 28th Council meeting for final action. Zoning File #1626 October 16, 1991 Page 3 Recommendation Options Planning Commission may wish to consider the following options for recommendation: 1. Recommend approval of the revised proposal as presented. 2. Recommend denial. 4. 3. Recommend partial approval, giving applicants specific direction as to what specific revisions are appropriate. Other, Ai r. Alanlu Vuiilar t ARCHITECTURE I ■■ • r \ I Cr I ••___c^cvo__ 14 October 1991 Mr. Mike Gaffron Orono Building Department 1335 South Brown Road Orono, Minnesota r^] i A 1S91 Dear Mike: Enclosed are the schematic plans , site plan and extended site plan for the Wilson Residence'The house has been adjusted so that there are just under 150 SF of area in the 5.5' setback area between 30’ and 24.5'. Unlike the Tratt proposal almost all of this pan of the house is one story. The house is also placed further back than die Traff proposal to reflect the change in the average setback the city council requested. The expanded site plan shows this average setback more accurately. The line of the average setback is located according to my understanding of the council's directions. If I am in error please notify me as it is not the intention of either the Wilson’s or myself to request a change. The expanded site plan demonstrates that by placing the mass of the garage to the east the three houses achieve a more equal spacing than when the garage is placed close to the Mitchell’s property. This change is welcomed by the Mitch­ ell's at. maintains the approval of the Lacey’s. I believe that this spatial rela­ tionship of the three residences is more in the spirit of Orono's zoning ordi­ nances and that it is more appropriate to this type of prime lakeshore property. If you have any questions or need any othw materials or documentation please notify me or Eric or Kristal Wilson. Thank vou. Sincerely, 57td nst Calhoun P^irlcvay Martha Yunker AIA Mmnuf'chs, AfinnefOU Telerhone ... 1 CITY OP ORONO P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 473-7357 APPLICATION NO. #1626 55323 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: September 25, 1991 Eric Wilson 2346 Vernon Circle Minnetonka, MN 55345 COPIES TO:Tim Traff 2683 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Martha Yunker 3766 W. Calhoun Parkway Minneapolis, MN 55410 TYPE OP APPLICATION: Variance (Revision) DATE OF MEETING: 9/23/91 VOTE: 4 For 0 Against COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION; Refer this to Planning Commission for review as a revision to previous approval (Resolution #2960). Planning Commission meeting will be held Monday, October 21, 1991, 7:00 p.m., Orono Council Chambers. Staff to re­ notify neighboring property owners. If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available frcn the City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. Isv tlif To:Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date September 18, 1991 Subject: #1626 Tim Traff/Eric Wilson - 2683 North Shore Dr. - Revised Site Plan - Review for Consistency with Resolution #2960 List of Exhibits Exnibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Letter of Request Proposed Site Plan Proposed Building Plan Resolution #2960 Comparative Site Plans Discussion Mr. Traff was granted lot width and lot area variances in May, 1991, in addition to a 5.5' side setback variance in order to construct a new residence. He has now sold the property to Eric and Kristal Wilson, who are proposing a slightly different house footprint. The changes were determined by staff to be significant enough to trigger Council review. The subtle differences between the Traff and Wilson site plans are as follows: 1. The Wilson plan slightly changes the angle of the residence in relation to lot lines. 2.The bulk of the house is slightly further away from the lake in the Wilson plan. 3.The Wilson's triple garage is located off the easterly wing of the house rather than the westerly wing. 4.The entire length of the Wilson garage is proposed to be 24.5' from the side lot line (totaling 200 s.f.), in addition to a 120 s.f. portion of house. In the Traff plan, only a portion of house encroached past the 30' setback line. In total, about 320 s.f. of building f'.'tprint will encroach past the 30' setback line with the Wilson plan. The Traff plan had 150 s.f, of encroachment. The proposed plan holds to the 25% hardcover limitation in the 75-250' zone. Zoning File #1626 September 18, 1991 Page 2 Issues to Consider 1.Remembering that the variance runs with the property, not with a specific applicant, the question to consider is whether the revised plan meets the spirit and intent of the Council in approving the variances for Traff's site plan. 2.Will the encroachment of the 3-car garage into the 30' side setback create visual density problems that are not inherent in the Traff proposal? 3.Is there any change in the impact on neighboring properties resulting from the revised plan? If so, would input from the adjacent property owners influence Council's final decision on this request? Note that the Planning Commission reviewed the request briefly and informally at their September 16 meeting, and generally agreed that the changes should be reviewed by Council, but did not discuss the specifics of the request. Staff Reccmmendation Council may wish to consider the following optional courses of action: 1. 2. Approve the revised site plan as proposed. Approve with revisions J •Conceptually approve, direct applicant to revise (give specific direction). 4.Refer to Planning Commission for formal recommendation (does Council wish that neighboring property owners be renotified?). 5.Conceptual denial based on increase area of encroaching footprint. 6.Other. Applicants wish to get started with construction as soon as possible. If this item was referred back to the Planning Commission for their October 21 meeting, it would be placed on the October 28 Council agenda. . ^ .. . . ________________Isv f r ' ’G r ~rr.GN “ ASS” >*'l.r't''JN I ^4l^ ZG*4iNS •'m i C'"*- FF.O^.i Eric !>.>. KRISTAL WiLSCW F£: SsES NCRTH SnGRE DRIVE - #1626 DATE: SEPTEMBER 9. 19“1 Thank ycu for <ne?=t:ing with as earlier today and diving us same guidancs in this arccess. As ws mentianec in our meeting, wa have entered into an agreement witn Tim and Beth Traft to purchase their home at 2683 f'^orth Shore Drive, iwo are scheduled to close the sale cn CctoSer 1, 1991 and wculd like to start cons true tier, o** our heme in early NevsmOer . As you know, the Traffs were intending to build a new home on this property themselves. In anticipation of that, they applied for side sstoack, lot area and lot width variances in Marcn 1991, Qn Nay 12, 1991 the Council granted "varaiances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 <B) to allow construction of a new residence on a lot IIS' in width where 200'in width is normally required, being 1.01 acrus in area where a 2.0 acre lot a-ea is normally required, and allowing a 24.5 east side lot line setback where a 30' side setback is normally required, subject to" several conditions. We have engaoed our own architect to design a heme to meet our particular family needs. As the heme is slightly different than that which was previously submitted to the Council for variance approvals, we are taking tne initiative and asking for the Council's continued support. Enclosed please find from our architect a site plan, ficcrplan, elevation, survey and hard cover calculation. As in the previous request, we are not locking far a hard cover variance. The enclosed hard cover calculation shows we are? wi'thin all limitations* □ur particular design not dn-ly _moves the orsoosed shrugty.rf», further back ( landward ) from the previous averaoe set.hack i,no. Hi>f moves the mass of the buildinc more towards the center nf the two adjacent orocertj.es. This snouid Drov.t.g^ additional protection of the Mitchell's lakeviews. and again more than meets minimum Cl tv requirements. It should be noted 'that the two proposed encroachments over the usual 30' side setbacks are only one-story structures .* and are within the previously approved 24.5' cast side lot line setback variance^ l: 5' -* I • r4'., ■>T' m»% * • 6 • • We are excited about our project and are particularly delighted about the prospects of living in Orono, I* > - . . ^ • *.V p 0 • • • ••• •• •»••*• * • ^ hi.' r \ \ / •V .t - :r* ;.* •• .’V: ' ^ . ’* \ :*. '•..*. .««••«■ # ••• •■••> “ ••».«■»« •» «• t*» •- • **' •• •••' • • k»* ^ _ * • » • _ . • • **- • % i '.* . . «-«* • • • • •' ' *' • ». • — ••. .1 • . • *• • c** “ '^<1 i;-’; H .'V t w>* ^ » i • - •* *•- - ' • -V ■•'•.I; '.•'i J * • '!*• '*• • •r. *;'* *\ t t ;'-i , » ’. ■ ^ •♦.• • -• ’i s • # • • ^ # - .. I ••:>•*:* 1 * • • i • . . .v;- * '* !** **1 .1 •• • .' ' : , J ♦ -• . •*•!«• , ^ ♦ ».,*•»> •< ' ■ ••« <• • • t ■• . • • • * # ‘ » ' *'• • * •••• . • • - • . .*• ■ •••• •» ♦«•*• «•• ••. -1 r * ei-EVATlOsJ • I -o* t r >15 pjCivM. .!.•* '• iS-' • i • •: -; • ■.4-* • • # • .»■ • f . i •^'y :f■fe-f : rv 4- »rL MliniffufliAi II O O •J-- .*'• • i CITY <>f ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2 ° ______— A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO municipal zoning code SF^ICN 10.23 r subdivision 6 (B) PILE #1626 WHEREAS, Tim and Beth aDolicants") are the owners of the property Shore Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter C-./ ) ana legally described as fellows; Tract 3, Reaistered Land Survey #1373, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property ); and WHEREAS, the applicants Je) to permit the construction of a 2.0 acre lot area is normally located 24.5’ from the east sioe lot line whe.e a 3 line setback is normally required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota; FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1626. 2. The property is located in the LR-IA Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Comm.ission approval of the lot width and lot area variances, and denial of the side setback variance, finding that. pronfr“^s\." 140 ’ in width. The house is believed its current locrtio.i since 1920, prior to the e-.ective date of current zoning regulations. B) The property is served with municipal sewer. Pace 1 of 5 O O '' %- V I ci* N CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CCUNClL NO.2960 C) When RLS #1372 was approved by the City in ^ variance for lot width at the lakeshore was granted by r^tv to the 140' lot width standard in effect at ^ne The prooerty was zoned for 1 acre minimum lot a-»a at that^tiine and the subdivision met the lot lot a-ea ^ width variance granted in fofs “fs«Tc" V to accom.-noda=e exisci:ig improvements aisoorated wi4'the residence at 2635 North Shore nrrve from which Tract B was createc, residence, which was prevrously a guest,-ca.etake. house for 2635 North Shore Drive, on a separate -ot. D) The existing residence 'isfrom the east side lot: lane. Whale thus resrdence as oroDosed to be demolashed and a new -esaoe ^ ‘a. a."“j f T oTT th<“ side lot line/ i>- isconstructea ^4.5 troir. on- axvat= rp«;idence techn'cally feasible to ccns-ruct ;lthou\ the need for a side setbac.k variance. A rph^ ritv Counc'T reviewed the application including_ the 4* The a . f Plannina Commission, reofr"rby"ct //rtaf f? Lle"nt “ by thl appli'cants ^and^.he effect of the ^vofed ^?-o” to" gran! cSnoeptuaTtppro-aal'of the lot jYnd\n\'^: setback variances, based on the fol ow^. ^ A) "’he ^’ndincs of the Planning Commission support approvaiof the lot area and width variances as proposed. B, .Although it as ^-»V°reo\lr::e"n=tr7r^^ SI“t7e"7ui?d!7g"!nv:Lp\^-d narrowing Of the la"Miu7^e7?n^ maximum advantage of the 1 property. C) Further, existing Ie7:?irierefif “t7 4Tne^ighb;}hlod ’.J providing increased conformity with City Codes. Pace 2 of 5 o o •J.. yi, -■ CITY of OSONO ''’%v <^/ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL '■^^ESH>i^-^The aDDlicanis have ir.dl'^§ted ”° ^=h'Ldcover variance and will ccnsrruct tne new res-oenc- to meet Orono's hardcover regulations. iLke’^h^rf” aetb"a“k ” line^'b^\he points on of rhe ?-cheil residence at 2685 North angleo nacure of g^.^rage lakeshore setback p"L“tectfo"n ''oV^he s' fake^v^eta'and^mo-re* than meeting minimum City requirements. • 1 ^ ^ th& conditions ©xisting on5. The City council finds that the concit generally this property are district; t.hat granting the to other traffic conditions, variances would not ad ©r other danger to light, air nor pose a ^;^ere 1 y serve as a neighboring propertv; but is necessary to convenience to h;q^dshio or difficulty; is alleviate a demonstrab ^ nrooertv right of the necessary to preserve a suDSt.t^ with*the soirit and ?S?L\^^oriheic:rn%^'cod%^rnd Comprehensive Plan of the city. CONCLDSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or pore of the “"f orono City Council hereby grants of i Code Section 10.23, Sr^divisi ^^^th where 200' in width is a?i;^;eguir:d. Un^ eal-? s-a: l^°t rint si ™ «hLrr3”'^side setback is normally required, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a building pem.it, applicants shall provide the following: A) certificate of Survey verifying the^location of^the neighboring residences proposed house location :iiiv indicated in Exhibit A. B) Site grading plan, ,ftv‘sScontours, to be reviewed by the City stc... a the normal building permit review process. O O ?1 f > ;'^. •'. >s CITY of OEONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.2960 llml that those in.provet.ents may be proposed. ., «;hal'’ not exceed the hardcoverj. Hardcover on .-he p..ope-uy ^ « 29 natie‘'v 0% maximumfh^r“;r-2^?-.^;'onr:ni 30. in the 250-500' zone. . V... 4-v^sc y*<?^f^ljt^on ru n w r c. n ..he 4. Authorities grantee by this res^ a-e‘oermissive only wi.tlii.ri ons V0S2T of tlis cl ^ _ qqo ^ variance will expire on that eate (May 1j, 199 ). w» th anv of the terms and londition;''o£ ?ks'vap.ance shall const^;ste a -Lira^hLri^n:hfd^L\ri“ri;ni “Li;Ts^ tisa 6. The undersigned an^^^ hereby agree to the terms o ‘ ^ assions, hereby llrfeTo^ihrre^Srdlnro^'thrsTesV’lution in the chain of title of the property. Adooted by the City ^ “fv T99I'. Minnesota a regular meeting held on the 13th day of May. ATTEST: 'allin. City Clerk i id Property Cw^r^s) Page 4 of 5 1/) O O w : I r CITY of ORONO 1*'*^ \*f ' ] » ^>A / VV - ■* ‘ **“ *RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing insfr;an,ent was acknowledged on • - - -^ ^ municipal corpo: of the City. 3si STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) befote L a_N^t?Y Fu^Uct^ P^onalXy appeared —f > r;^ ^K^^;l^risr''de^ribed in and who exgcutec SoYng"in%\rLfnt,"rnd°acknowled,ed than he (they, ekccuted the same as his (their) free act and deed. day of , 199/ THERESA L NAAB NOTARY PUBUC - MINNESOTA liV^XTJ HENNEPIN COUNTY t Uy cBmniitMi axpiTM M-Q2 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) } SS. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this _ __ day of 199 , before me a Notar“publii~ithin°fnd for said county, personally _________—----------------------7—;—c?o«!f"^Thed in and who executed the NOTARY PU3LIC Page 5 of 5 3s-t 1 V '^57' y? s^ t,.^4. ;i^S!'li''rrL \i k\ W'S^ / *« 7 5 • -f 5 O fioT" V. Oftt\ h ^DRmflL. AveiRA(5e /AJi^SHOi^ s*j^ack ■1: IX' A / n'»x^ » >-«p . >■••• ^ 3 .»• C'-'m ' 'J f 1 ns ]L%CXvrx-T^|‘ 21 i'- '*‘‘, I^■cn . , y k !».• '■“""“.SS? '"A ;ji < »■ > .-,7i.‘i^. '-^^9-..... ,-------------- O-7S/0*^ sc/Uci. A/i^ 2t90B^ — V* ' S^&A'tT y: A. ^ s V /A^ /-/ r '*-'* .1 / ^ wr# ' /f ^ j f'XHIfi’IT A (2tS6i.MT7o^i # / 2‘X^U -/\ioT‘ 7X? fTCA^-c: - ? .• To;Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Date: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator October 14, 1991 Subject #1682 Christine Brickley, 3262 North Shore Drive Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing List of Exhibits A B C D Revised Garage Plan Submitted Staff Sketch, Revised Site Plan Notice of Planning Commission Action 9/16/91 Memo and Exhibits of 10/6/91 Discussion Applicants have revised their garage p-oposal, reducing the size from 1056 s.f. to 768 s.f. (24* x 32'). The revised garage of 768 s.f. requires 15' setbacks from the west and south lot lines. Applicants propose to make use of the recently poured slab, hence the new proposal leaves a 10.5' setback to the south lot line and 3.3' to the west lot line. At your September mi?eting, applicant indicated that the garage and slab would not increase hardcover above the pre­ existing levels, because the previous garage and shed were positioned near the west lot line with gravelled parking area in front, hence the area covered by slab was already totally hardcovered. We have no photos or pre-existing survey to verify this, however, in this case hardcover in the 75-250' zone would remain at 50.6% with the current plan. Applicants propose to use the southerly 8' of the slab for boat and truck storage. Issues to Consider 1.Is there sufficient haruship or justification to grant a 4.5' south lot line setback variance and 11.7' side setback variance to allow the proposed garage? 2.Under the current proposal, lot coverage will stay at the pre-existing level of 17.5%. The 768 s.f. garage contains the equivalent enclosed space of the pre-existing shed, garage, and storage barn. Is there sufficient hardship or justification to grant a variance for 17.5% lot coverage? 3.If hardcover stays at its claimed pre-existing level of 50.6% in the 75-250' zone, is there hardcover in the 0-75' zone that could be removed to compensate? 1 Zoning File #1682 October 14, 1991 Page 2 Options for Reconmendation Planning Cominission could consider the following possible recommendations : 1. Approval as r.vised, with or without additional conditions. 2. 3. 4. 5. Isv Partial approval, subject to limitations on garage size, location and/or concurrent hardcover removals (specify those conditions). Denial . Table further, give applicant specific direction as to what further revisionsare necessary. Ocher. ly—fc-’ —la 1 fTY 1 a «t IT ff / 'l)* ^ I A -/V t j2 py • j>- k |ii>»' *7 Clxk}^& 1 ». . - %L=_______ ^ 1/ • «« •-# tav.™ <- ^ '^‘■•^ V'~' "' 4av£)I»U., i» «•<*), 4A-* « f -gv & xr 22- U)/ <^vr\*^ A/' ^/5rD freoPoiA-L /P '//- 9 / / K • % ^ • ■ . rv ' • f ■ • ‘VU • * t.. / •' '• 1 •At w. .rf. i ^ •• f N **T ■ \ -m : •»»7,» • : •. • * » : 4, *• *, » V p. • • %r / . • i • • • :■ ‘ • .•i* .. . • • •• • .• V*;* t • ’ • «I • I »> • • I • ■ • ' • . ^ ' . • I '• •\ • ■ $ ‘J I . • I • • .. • ( * * It '•*1 . 1 .1 . **■! •• •• / 4 r f • •f 5 • • , • .1 ••f ■ 4) « 0 Pi^oPose^^ HAAc^coVeK 453.3 W«.s/i, Q3.0O' \n /• CITY OP ORONO P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING PILE #1682 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice: 9/17/91 TO: Christine Brickley 3262 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES TO: TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance VOTEDATE OF MEETING: 9/16/91 Planning Commission recommends the following Tabled for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 5 For 0 Against Tabled pending submittal by applicant of a revised proposal that more closely meets the hardcover, lot coverage and setback requirements. Please contact Mike Gaffron at the City Offices (473-7357) if you wish to discuss your options. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the October 21 meeting is October 11, 1991. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. Isv To; !V i Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission iMembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator Prom: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: September 6, 1991 #1632 Christine Brickley, 3262 North Shore Drive Variance ~ Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-lC-1, Single family lakeshore residentialr 1/2 acre/ unsewered Application: Request for variances to construct oversized accessory structure (garage) Varicuices Required: 1. Accessory structure footprint area in excess of 1,000 s.f. on lot less than 2 acres in area (Section 10.03, Subdivision 8 (C) (2), Lot is 0.28 acres. 2. Proposed detached garage of 1056 s.f., if allowed, would require 30' setbacks from lot lines (Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C) (3) (A). Proposed "as poured" setbacks: Wost side: 3.33' South (rear): 2.56' V'.equired: 33' 3. 75-250' hardcover in excess of 25% allowance (Section 10.22, Subdivision 2) Pre existing hardcover: 46.5% Proposed hardcover: 50.6% Note: n-75' hardcover is 15.6% where none is allowed. 4. Lot coverage in excess of 15% allowance (Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C)). Pre-existing lot coverage: 17.5% Proposed: 19.8% Hardship Statement Please see applicant's Letter of Request. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Letter of Request Zoning File #1682 September 6, 1991 Page 2 of 3 Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Survey Staff Survey/Hardcover Review Before/After Hardcover Proposals Municipal Sewer Location Diagram Garage Plan Submitted Inspection Notice 8/22/91 Discussion Applicant demolished the pre-existing 20' x 24' garage and removed from the site a pre-existing 10' x 20' shed/barn structure without obtaining the necessary demolition permit. This came to the attention of City staff when applicant was found to be pouring a slab on the property August 22, 1991. The slab was half poured when discovered by the Building Inspector and a Stop Work Order was immediately posted. However, because concrete for the remainder of the slab was on the way and could not be returned, applicant was allowed to pour the remainder of the slab at applicant's risk. Applicant was advised that there is no guarantee that the slab and/or any garage proposed to be constructed on it, would meeu the Code requirements, and continuing work was entirely at the applicant's risk. Applicant immediately ordered survey work, and upon submittal of the survey, as anticipated by staff, the proposed work did not meet Code in many respects. Staff review of the survey and field measurements indicate that the existing house was not accurately plotted by the surveyor in relation to rhe normal shoreline. Staff has slightly redrawn the shoreline to reflect field conditions, as well as confirm and correct the insufficient hardcover data supplied by the applicant. The City has to date not required permits for sidewalks, surfacing of driveways, or other grade level concrete pours, although quite often such work places a property owner in violation of the hardcover ordinance. Since construction of the garage itself had not been started nor were there garage construction materials on the site, technically the work to date did not need a permit. In this respect, the application for garage construction is not after-the-fact. The Building Inspectors have indicated that it may be feasible to cut away portions of the slab and make use of the remainder using certain construction techniques. The Planning Commission should not therefore necessarily make the assiamption that the slab would have to be entirely redone if some portion of the proposed work is approved. ______________J Zoning File #1682 SeptemDer 6, 1991 Page 3 of 3 Issues t;o Consider 1.Is there any reasonable justification to allow a garage of any size to be located 2-3' from the rear and side lot lines? A garage 0-750 s.f. in area would normally require 10' setbacks from the side and rear lot lines for this lakeshore lot. A garage 751-1000 s.f. would require 15' setbacks. 2.Because the lot is only 0.28 acres in area, is there any justification to grant a variance to allow an accessory structure in excess of 1000 s.f. footprint? 3.Is there any justification to allow lot coverage by structures to increase from 17.5% pro-existing to 19.8%, when the Code only allows 15%? Does the intent to provide enclosed storage for collector cars, masonary construction equipment, and other items currently stored outside on the property, justify the size garage proposed? Is the single large garage structure more appropriate for the site than a number of smaller buildings, from a visual perspective? Note that the applicants propose to remove the tin shed remaining on the property. 4.Is there any justification for approval of a hardcover Increase from 46.5% (including the tin shed, old 20' x 24' garage, and old 10' x 20' barn) up to 50.6% in the 75-250' zone? Is there additional hardcover in the 0-75' or 75-250' zones that can be removed to mitigate the additions? Note that the driveway and parking area is part of a shared loop driveway serving two other residences. Options for Recoonnendation Planning Commission might wish to consider the following possible recommendations: 1. Denial. 2.Partial approval, subject to limitations on garage size, location and/or concurrent hardcover removals (specify those conditions). 3.Approval as proposed, with or without additional conditions. 4.Table, giving applicant direction as to what type of plan revisions might result in a positive recommendation. 5.Other.oc, -Wt-?<^-C5 Isv t /< . hi r. CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCS APPLICATION I" 5^' w. Initial Application Fee ($50.00 per each additional varranca) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 // (no change from original application) ^ After-the-Fact Fees (Double application tee) .ii • K .1 fI • j o, property LOCATION Site Oe-lc^ property Identification Nu^er (P. I. D • > Og-/'^-^41 - ooo8 r/TT OF mHQ h\.WCE OFFICE 1J502000QQ 01 CE)i 175.00AtSch legal description to application if not included on required survey. ___£6SH.--.lt___115.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Phone fhomel jjji, j-jj.-t n / OB/22/^ Phone (work) U"?-------- APPLICANT Neune Qr~ City: OrtfvXQ Zip: 5^35/----- Phone f home) — Address _ _ _ _ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name __ _ _ _ _ _ _—-Phone (worJc) Address:Citv: 3\e>'^ zip: Date Property Acquired _ _ _ _ _ _ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. (month/year) PRESENT OSB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) ^S^TOOH OP RBQOBST Estinated Construction Cost S Describe request in detail: variances required Lot Area 3^f . Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front Hardcover /sld^/i^eaj^ Other I flint .^at^■•fttAfi.'aauiatftfAmai etAAAt i4.mk/f.kA:aiiiKrn'a.ii*su.irt iorrLiic. .tti Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:_- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DESCRIPTION OP UNUSDAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing complia^nce with zc Code Requirements; ywjnTwm SDBMITCXfcS 1. /;)C ning $ Completed Application Form a. • Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). . Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8!< xll for reproduction). •^ u Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8i;"xli”). Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8J5"xll ). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list o any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional'items as may be requested by City staff. ?he Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour variance applica tion is not complete if the abg ^ ■iwfoTumtion has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (s a time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and corpe^t^^ the best^f his/her knowledge^ \pplicant's Signature 5. 6. 7. 8. Date OWNERS SIGNATURE ^ The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission member^and Council^giembers for purposes of investiga­ tion and verificatiop<o?^l(hiy request. ^ Owner's Signature in I Date Applicant must have all aubmittala into the City offices 25 days before the raview meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is agent attlfd**?/yturTA"cl' a^^'Vo* foni Office of this change prior to the meeting. an Zoning / i (■ / r- I // / $ * / (maxwell BAY) # CM •rr r*- h- O') o liJ •LO ^'V . 'U”! I .:• \ \ ' • t .• • . iv‘.' • i %, t *f . r •• :?ir^ T \ *. •. •’ f ■’ ‘k- *• ■•' • ■. VI:’-' •I , • • . •i ’■'V •’• i •• .* • •• ■ • . 4Vv . :,*••••'■• ;• •• ■• • - • • • v:.Ml?,'.•••• •) . ■••.•••=■• ■ • V ’ c'.•.V • I. TO • : • * . 'A!.;. • • • .•» •• t I • • *• * *' • ••t! • •» . «• • <y ?■. •..* I . «\k ,A. J • • • • J i. •K-'' 1 I yV‘- .f • • .•. •f • • • .'yV t.;- --J I ■IlMlil ■ilLiiuL.. . f i r \1 '• - ‘i \ . RUN DATE 08/23/91 BATCH 001 t PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR • ( PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 08-117-23 91 0005 03290 NORTH SHORE DR L H0I8C A 0 HORK LARRY HORK C/0 NORTH SHORE DR MARINA 3222 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 38 08-117-23 91 0008 03292 NORTH SHORE DR CHRISTINE M BRICKLEY CHRISTINE M BRICKLEY 3262 NORTH SHORE DR HAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 91 0011 03286 NORTH SHORE. DR RITA M STRALEY R M A S E STRALEY 5039 TUXEDO BLVD MOUND m 55369 v f. . 38 08-117-23 99 0009 03302 NORTH SHORE DR MirtCTONU PROPERTIES INC JAMES J DUm 3229 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 1 ‘ . I . J . • I : •’ . V. / /it ^ c: •'i- i; ■ ■ *. rJ HEM4EPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0I«4ERS LIST ) ■. ' ■) I • 1 • f 38 08-117-23 91 0006 03250 NORTH SHORE OR L HORK A 0 HORK LARRY HORK C/0 NORTH SHORE DR MARINA 3222 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 38 08-117-23 91 0009 03268 NORTH SHORE OR RONALD 0 STAUFFER RONALD 0 STAUFFER 3268 N SHORE OR HAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 91 0012 03329 NORTH SHORE DR MINNETONKA PROPERTIES INC JAMES J DUNN 3229 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO m 55391 38 08-117-23 99 0018 03280 NORTH SHORE OR RITA M STANLEY R M A S E STRALEY 5039 TUXEDO BLVD MOUND MN 55369 REPORT NO. PI935901 PAGE 38 08-117-23 91 0007 03260 NORTH SHORE DR VERA M MARTIN JAMES J DUNN 3229 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 38 08-117-23 91 0010 03290 NORTH SHORE DR RITA M STRALEY R M A S E STRALEY 5039 TUXEDO BLVD HOUND MN 55369 38 08-117-23 99 0001 03269 NORTH SHORE DR RICHARD 0 NORUM ET AL RUSSELL A NORUH 15500 HAYZATA BLVO UNIT 1003 HAYZATA MN 55391 . t 6 TOTAL BATCH ^ t*. * * II. • ■ \ ..<■ I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESEMTED ARE AN ACCURATE AM) TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION A» IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS ‘-''i'v; * • F, i t i . . f . . V .- • * * ♦ N 001 OOOII * . • . M . iV I • 4 I. ' ‘ • ■ •; •.} •••. •r* : ‘ 1 . i .4: ■.ViS -1 • M-'V . > ; .4'* i • T I . , A •. ^ - • •‘" 'V’» 1 li- ' *• * / ’J -i ►A**!"* * *. ^ ^ ■ \ .£)Ujul O«-^S toes fgjuyN^cbwvi _ c20 L__K - fV\A>djL U^&t3<£ .___is -._^0yviiyH'.^2A_ ?'_X'. ___ : tvM,_____________jg/^ ______________<vu: __ J s _b-u-Jbi^. LOg^ ^fUitueSL 4-£> Qi„J.<-A*ir:..Si __O^jjUL^__3pS^ ......................................____________----------------------------------------------- ^A j __<^^guc^u^><_ . tf - - ^ s C^Vvcb*'^'-<>-<^ ,. !^^~C,^^o-'^_ ^Qr/ut^^. _ . Jo^„U6 „S>€ __^ ________________________C^L^ rr - % «t<)U.-‘^. .'3:7__,fin-t^- _«<-a^. 1^ <U^ , <Ut*{ ,c >Ia ^ __lc«-.o*— 3'trx dJLC <v| (yu-^<^ ---- "*l.<rv^^ t _0\JL^ U->^ _ LA^ Ci— _? .. ___/Vci UJ^ _ Jrfcv_ fj;^a..^*>trua-^ i<v>LtA-> i>o-<_ lwjLC _^_B-._/£? Q<r\_<yVAA— vjUL4v«icXu<? _>VTcP___'dh^^‘^:‘'s*— l_• *f f f f I - -*• .. • L,„I ^ntfnitfaiall'iii fcniifr^ a HARDC3VE?. D.LCULATiOtIJJGSESnc;! SETBACK ZCB. (c:bczb c.e )(^ 75-250' 250-500' 500-10CO' E xisting Hardcove ?. in fn X___iLA. House ■Wo S.F LENGTH Bi Garage c. Driveway D., Sidewalk E. Patio/ deck F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN (o BY . ----U PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other X X __X _ X _ X WIDTH Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone nUi B S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. — S.F. — S.F. S.F. _ S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F S.F. r :'\ n I S.F. JI A S.F B X 100 /;>73 % ------ - ■«iM..i« ».">»*yw^'.T.g^.~-.»-^,iirii'niYfnnitriiiiiV)irrri-tr- - A. HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKShy ScTBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE CNE) 0-75' (7S-2S Existing Hardcover in Zone 250-300' 500-1000' A. House D. Sidewalk E. Patio/ Deck F.Landscape AREAS underlain ?Lst.c • sheeting G. Other LENGTH WIDTH Total Hardcover in Zone 7 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. a .S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F /s-n S.F. S.F.Total Property Area in Zone - - - - - - X 100 = %B r7-f i ■■..A.A.Att JkjnMMI. ^ HI m !■! Mi~M I f I V .‘JU MV-fl li.'Bk. Vi ■* —A ■ kk> Al H.M blkkA k t. X i .T h • * • • vV-; • 4 , . . ’ V-* •‘f. ••’••; • •• '•. •>■ - • ••• ny• ; •* * V • ? 4 -.. ^ - •• •» •» * I ' \ I • ' • }•. • • *». • t ’ .*•• . • % . •• i i *• •;v‘* I % . V • « • •• • • *, •J.-i • i , < •• ; I. • • : • . •» ' * • • .• • • •% - •. • .i# • *• .. •* * «• * V » * • 't * i . * • 4 L • h * . •• . ■Av<. • ,.f I . f. . V •;a V* • • *■• ^ t I •-. •'.• • » .• 'v-' •; ‘ivi..’!' *• •?-*/ ?• ’ • '• • ♦ .* *. • *.» /t’** » • . • « • • t';- , r, ’ •f*‘ 4 * « i i • ' . . * * • . f • . r * / • • ■ * i i . A « • t • • .*■’ .*» --i: •• V ‘ *::• \ ' • :> . ••• i • • •, •*• «k • } » % • ; • « \ > % -9 . f •* s ■ •. ' ;*.• ■ .*• »• •*r ► *. .ri ^9 « • • 4 • • (/ ffie- flA^o covae. ■^3S. 3 W^sH.Qa.oa' ---------- » . ^ ... - /• .. ^ ^l s' '' r : •; -• •'■•■• •• / • :::^ * • •■ <«•«*<* -.1 . r'. / • -•• - - '•r*^.' \V • ^ , P~:r7 f^mm. I ”0 -/ ^ •'/ —• ‘ ‘ ■ •, 1^ J . ,.■• / . • -.. X.-- • . ^ - /- I /"• ui rr-------J-----t ^;:- ■j.._ I--------------1- vr CITY of ORONO CITY OF QROnO Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323 •Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka January 17, 1990 Norman Carlson 3262 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Dear Mr. Caorlson: currently there is a sanita.p' sewer is owned and maintained by the Metropolitan has-e Con.-that Conunission. 1 a. S6WS2T construcricn in the a—ea by TLt‘°se°we- \in^e%'^a®n''s^that sewer line. That sewe- i 1 lation of the new 3200 North Shore Drive. c Acan lift station by Maxwell J Shore D‘rive. In ordereliminate the liic station at ^200 Nor .h S^hj^^re^ to accomplish this, we will need - -hat i^ is now flowing, will flow in the opposite allowing that There are permanent easements on order to sewer line and ^need temoorary easements fromplace a new sewer line, we will neec tcmuwi. 2 you A temporary easement allows us *° SfctThf p^o/e^T its original condition. needed ?o^\"on\^trt;t'’/he^;r;:e"=t.'' :r:^Vuid'U fo begin construction in February or March. Please call me upon receipt of this “® can schedule meetings with you. 1 can be reached a. 473 735,. Sincerely, John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director jRG/tln 1 BUILDING Sl zoning - 473-735^ assessing administration 1 FINANCE - 473-735H KAX -4734J5I0 PUBLIC \AORK.S - 473-7359 - ^ :■ j • t i-l-J ii. •. /• • ', • 1 • •• . • DATE TIME CITY OF ORONO INSPECTION NOTICE PERMIT NO CALLED IN SCHEDULED ADDRESS OWNER _ ____________________ COMPLETED ^/o 'ZPL:i a 1 - Ur lU/nr-^ CONTR. J TELEPHONE NO. ---------1 m JJ! % s .. I8«e cr DESCRIPTION. 01POOTING 02 FRAMING 03 INSULATION 04WAUBO. OS FINAL 07 OEMO-SITE 07 DEMO—FINAL 00 PLUMBING Rl 10 PLUMBING FINAL 11 MECHANICAL Rl 11 MECHANICAL FINAL 24/25 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 12 WATER HOOK UP 13METPRSeT/TURN ON 14 SEWER HOOK UP 27 SEPTIC MAINT. 15 SEPTIC INSTALL 23 SEPTIC FINAL 16 WEU TEST PUMP 18 EXCAV/GRAOING/FILUNG 19 LAKESHORE/WETLANDS 34 TREE REMOVAL 17 SITE INSPECTION 06 PROGRESS 21 COMPLAINT 22 FOLLOW-UP OWNERAJONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU; YES NO COMMENT o It ono Uj q: t2 % Uj Ui q: cra.0q<3' /c L/)/O / o Ui QC Ul § M fiy U)QjL, he. 1 OA O WORK SATISFACTORY^ PROCEED □ CORRECT WORK & PROCEED □ CORRECT WORK, CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING D CORRECT UNSAFE CONDTHON WITHIN___ INSPECTOR WIU RETURN c P roject COMPLETE □ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY ______temporary ______PERMANENT 1 stop order posted . CALL INSPECTOR INSPECTION REQUIRED. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. HOURS. Q photo TAKEN C CITATION ISSUED Call for the next Inspection 24 hours In advance. 473-7357 Owner/Contrafifor prfsite: Inspector antr^or errsite: — . 'p .\hiL4 VWill* Cop»rtntp*eio»'» Fll«Canary Copy/Sli# Notice / L • • • «.. ••••r • r.-•-i; • • a • ^ taakaao * ‘■ •rv.v •■'•*. • • 1. . • .* *• • -* • »i •;. V:v> r'. * - ...; . • •. .*•-r’ •^ * • A . A . • •■ v.i • T , •*. - • V . . . - * • • •' • • • • • % • 9*0 f • t« -/|K^:‘V'*ivv^-: • ■ t ^ 1 • *. * J • • • • #»• I • ••. . A V’ f -f- . • - • .* S .. .• .• -..I .• • • .M. , - '#•••. %• *• % «• • •;••• . ••• .* , •» .• - . ■*• » *• .* V, I**:.* .< «*. ••b < •• • • \ ; A • 4. * .«*»•«« . . • • • ’ • . . ‘K.iwwasT-g *1 « ■ , » « ■• « •M4> MillLL. /i . .' W''<f . . -j • - t • • ■lAifc ■ III i‘aTrtoiiinffif»ii rfin ■ To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Date: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator October 18, 1991 Subject: #1683 Robert F. Suess, 2590 Watertown Road Subdivision - Continuation of Public Hearing List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Topographical Survey Future Subdivision Concept Plan Notice of Planning Commission Action 9/17/91 Planning Commission Minutes 9/16/91 Petition fx'om Hackberry Neicihbors City Engineer's Letters 10/8/91, 9/12/91 Septic Layout Memo and Exhibits of 9/9/91 Discussion The applicant has submitted a concept plan for future subdivision of the property, and has submitted a topographical survey of the entire property. The City Engineer reviewed drainage on the site on October 17 and his verbal recommendations are summarized as follows (see 10/18/91 letter); - creation of a drainage swale along Watertown Road - regrading of existing drainage sv/ale along subdivision east boundary discharging to a detention pond to created at the northeast end of the property - upgrading of culverts and swales as necessary between 155 and 185 Hackberry Hill - drainage easements to be provided along all lot lines, and over existing pond north of house and new pond to be created - construction of paved road and cul-de-sac to City standards It was noted that the east boundary of the property contains a number of trees which would be destroyed if the existing swale, which needs to be upgraded, is kept v/ithin the standard 10' perimeter drainage easement. It is staff's recommendation that in order to save these trees, the easement along the east border be expanded to 25', allowing the swale to be upgraded within its current location. Because this is a perimeter easement, the area of the easement should not be excluded from dry buildable area. 1 . k -.A »^..i• 111 I a, pi I ~»F'r In mi i ■ t i i ^ 11 i t m mu i m M'l'iMirtl im n i < i p 1111 ■■ ru k j .J t IL Zoning File #1683 October 18» 1991 Page 2 of 2 The Engineer's further recommendation is that a private road paved to at least a 24' width with a temporary paved cul-de-sac be constructed now to serve this first phase of the subdivision. Basework should be wide enough to accommodate a future 28' wide paved width, in anticipation of a future 9 lot development of this property. Neighborhood Petition Referring to the neighborhood petition submitted at the September meeting: a. Per Exhibit G, septic drainfields are 60-70' from the east lot line, and mote than 100' from neighboring wells, j# TT j.* ^ Jimeeting all pertinent code standards. b. Drainage changes recommended by City Engineer will redirect all surface water runoff to eliminate existing drainage problems and concerns . c. The alleyway noted by petitioners is not a legal access of any sort. Applicant has sole discretion as to whether he wants to allow for continued use by neighbors. Issues to be Resolved Again please review the staff memo of September 9, 1991. The following issues need to be addressed in order to make a recommendation for preliminary plat approval; 1. Should the existing house be forced to relocate its driveway to Outlet A? 2.Should the applicant be required at this time to construct a 24' paved road with 100' diameter paved cul-de-sac? Staff Recommendation Please refer to the Staff Recommendation on Pages 4 and 5 of the September 9 memo. Any recommendation for approval should include Conditions 1 - 9 as indicated in that memo. Condition 2 on Page 4 should be revised to read "2. Standard drainage and utilities easements to be granted over entire plat, as well as drainage easements over ponding areas as noted in City Engineer's letter of 10/18/91. Preliminary site grading/drainage plan per City Engineer's recommendation to be submitted by applicant for approval prior to preliminary plat review by Council." Isv < « r-. • V** £ / -r i ^ J : 0'/v ■••. ••■ ;- . . ... .t* }-L r.7 y: : 7> « A*-• i \ \ K: V V\>. "x\ 4 / * ?•• I|3 / «t*« mm/ W >»» 1^ 'I N \ I I/ y _____I__________«c:i_________ ft LOT 2 jI 1 1 m ; n 1 ♦ ,i ; 1 4 _ ....^_____________ 1 ifm-U a« •«< / ____. ;a • —... . -fr #ViV r *. . / *1^ * *>L M •* . _. ..., ‘1 *•«•# ■* 0» M • • ** ^I — r?7^ /v^/ 4 1 / //^' / / / / . 6 / ?•-* •> ^ 7 / #*«< o <o CL .1. *».•' »•aUILQI_A r*« •*. ->- f*A*. 1 1 1 .1 0 t *• m. 9 f «f «c •t mm* I! ! <• •'*-* 1 ._. •• n - f; ■• — ^ i»y f- f“77'Tf'Z . M tt • f f V; '* <• • >o Hcr UJ. K- < C t •k ?♦ '*•V 4 POSSIBLE FUTURE SUBDIVISION PLAN jf.. • -- ^ V^T' \ .• m •*^‘» . . PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR ROBERT F. SUESS IN THE SE V4 OF THE SE V4 OF SECTION 33-118-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA t iiTini I ^ •. • • • • •V. .*•>• 1•r* f• • • • • * •• :r‘V: A T ' ^ :"*.v . 1 ri. •• i *.v •- ^ jV • • ^ . .*h *• ••Tw • /. . • v: • i Vt 4-" tdm^t£SiSMigimimma:aiatauat^tstimauaaimtdmst --- CITY OP ORONO P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1683 55323 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice; 9/17/91 Robert F. Suess 2590 Watertown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 COPIES TO: T. J. Haislet 2285 Daniels Street Long Lake, MN 55356 TYPE OP APPLICATION: Subdivision DATE OF MEETING: 9/16/91 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against Planning Commission recommends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Tabled pending receipt of topography and contours for the entire parcel. Planning Commission did not vote on whether a paved 24' road would be required, but did express concerns regarding drainage from the site. The issue of reserving an access easement along the east lot line for the Hackberry Hill residents was not addressed and is left to the applicants discretion; however, such an access easement by definition does not count towards dry buildable area. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the October 21 Planning Commission meeting is October 11, 1991. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. Enclosures; - Neighborhood Petition Submitted at 9/16/91 Meeting - City Engineer Recommendation Letter Isv rx ' J rt. rT- ^ . s minutes of the ORONO planning commission meeting - SEPTEMBER 15, 1991 SL iU tU ZONING FILE #1608 - CONT. It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Rowlctte, to recommend approval for application #1608 James Hartzoll of 2987 Casco Point Road, approving a hardcover variance to allow 27.3% hardcover in 75-250' zone, and an average setback variance of 25' for the proposed pool. Schroeder asked if the pool could be downsized. Swanson noted that by scaling down the pool, it would not be as usable. It would also change the feeling of openness that the property projects. He noted that the pool is proposed at 684 s.f. and an average pool is 700-800 s.f. Gaffron noted that the 27.3% hardcover does not include the water tower. Rowlette felt that the tower should remain for historical reasons. Johnson revised his motion to approval of 27.8% hardcover in the 75-250' zone. Ayes 4, nays 1. Cohen opposed the motion because he felt they should not approve hardcover above the 25% limitation. (#4) #1683 ROBERT F. SUESS 2590 WATERTOWN ROAD - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - PUBLIC HEARING 8:00 - 8: 15 P.M. ^ ^ The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. T.J. Haislet was present to represent-the applicant. Caffron explained this is a request for a subdivision of a parcel of 19.7 acres, which is currently two tax parcels, to create two new building sites. The subdivision creates lots next to the Hackberry neighborhood, and will create a 50' outlot along whe western edge of the new lots. The sites have been tested for septic systems. He noted that the applicants would prefer to consider the outlot as a private driveway. Gaffron asked how the Commission would intrepret this subdivision, as a two'or three lot subdivision. He noted the code requires a private road if it serves three residences. Ha explained the current residence .. accesses to .Watertown Road. He also noted that the outlot in ."^'placed so'it will accommodate future subdivision of ..the. remaining . ‘. property to the north. i V Haislet noted the applicant has no present plans to further subdivide. Gaffron noted the drainage concerns of the City Engineer Cook has requested topographic maps for the entire property. UuTES or TH. ORONO PEAN.X.3 COHHXSSIO. HEETXNO - SEPTEMBER XC. XOOX 5§NINQ FILE #1683 - CONT. h ittod by a group of neighboring Cohen read a no septic tank drainfiold be residents which requested . . g from each boundary of conitrCcted within ^o^o^on Hackborry have their the newly created lots the drainage from the propertr proposed'*?or deve 1 opment runs^across__the^ba^ ya^^ a^ong""thr'-aas?^rn’lor1lno'’t^ro«.a1n for uao by the HacKbarry neighbors. Dunwpeath Paasley. 98 ’ hiralstern lot line Sueas himsau and neighbors. He notadjhat ed as a cartway oy Uved t*^r?:arha/-i=red^?or rs lo^g^'j;,^ ?ne Hlc^be^^rnlirf 9^bor^£d^ Belaid he cdrrantly has 3'' o Standing water in his back yn ny .. . . . . . ^u^ii felt that Mr. Suess put Richard Wagner, 35 Hackberry ^ j^^g to develop his the carlwaj in for his own use by the neighboringiithodt -stric ions on that^cartw^y^^y^ 5^?^^;‘LTo^S=into^?hf Neighborhood. ,3va Pishar, XdX H^--Try^Hi 11. ,;--,rbrCp=?oNN “nN to remain it would be nice, but teis owners to sot up. ,0 hi- wells are far enough away from the proposed .obdi^iliN loNttlNa Should be no problem. The owner. 1X9 ’ibSwisiN^Nd^'eNlained'' that ?N%iNNdoN“^NNpNNNs baoK yard. water. Peasley noted that 30’ from his present well i= tanding Rowlatte noted that site grading and drainage plans have not been submitted.hut. «are NiiNL ^foNaNNoNlNirsiN’irthrcoNfsNonN^NcKets. notiTiuu -------- . three?°^rr sNNd^^N -tNf‘N" N Nivate drive.Hod She noted Rnwlette felt that more ikely be developed or cul-de-sao f ^^curNN Nner move his driveway, waste and expense to have the curr 0 t: I a;•d jtaifc. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - SEPTEMBER 16. ZONING FILE #1583 - CONT. Schroedor fel . the drainage concerns should be addressed. MOOS felt the outlet should be developed as a private drive. n'at1or#168r?or^^berriSeL ?:rpr:?i.?Lrr=ubdiv°s,ofof locftad :r259S"wa%oPtown RoaS to allow the applicant time to submit drainage plans for the property. Ayes S. nay. 0. (#6) #1669 JOHN WALKER VARIANCES^- CONtLuATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 8:22 - 8:27 P.M. Mr. & Mrs. John Walker and their representative, Dick Schieffer, were present. sohleffer explained that the applicants have reduced their -^eS -e harScoJe^^L^b^l^; ^h^pre 19^^^ ^^r^^^d^i^r'^^n til: however the 0-75' zone has been reduced to 7.^% from 14.1.^. Cohen asked staff how hardcover went from 30?& pre-1975 to 50%+ presently. Gaffron noted that most of that percentage is In plastic or fabric lined landscaping and patio blocks. both of which do no require permits. Schroeder felt the Increase was almost solely In landscaping. Cohen asked If the 0-75' zone could bo reduced to the 0% limitation. Gaffron felt that the stairway and retaining walls are needed Ho noted that there Is a pre-existing shed, and they ULld have to determine If they wish to require the removal of that shed. Cohen then asked If the 75-250* hardcover could further bo reduced. percentage In that zone. 8 1 *r • • f • • • • f *1 n ■ I -M- ■-!! If 1 I ii III, fctt ■ IT 'T iiT ira^-fTi <i gT— i ill i ~Hi rn~r Tr ^g-iiiniT K i _..J I date 9/11/91 TO; PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF ORONO SUBJECT: PLANNED SUBDIVISION OF PROPERTY AT 2590 WATERTOWN ROAD WE THE UNDERSIGNED, REQUEST THAT THE FOLLOWING BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION: THAT NO SEPTIC TANK DRAIN FIELDS BE WITHIN A REASONABLE DISTANCE OF THE EAST BOUNDARY OF THE NEW LOTS. REASON MOST HOMES HAVE THEIR WELLS ON THE WEST SIDE OF THEIR HOMES, AND THE DRAINAGE FROM THE ABOVE -PROPERTY RUNS ACROSS THEIR BACKYARD.THEREFORE, THE DANGER OF CONTAMINATION TO THE WELLS IS POSSIBLE.i IN THE PAST WE HAVE HAD ACCESS TO THE WEST END OF OUR PROPERTY BY A CARTWAY OR ALLEY-WAY. WE WOULD APPRECIATE IT IF IT WERE TO iI Bones troo QZia Rosene Anderlik & \[\ Associates Cz: Q Pa C •£ Vj'VA L So%'3J. I? C V»"r * Coc^. P5 •r:-4J 5. sr.ti SjU'’ XV £sj;^ C/A Engineers & Architects October 16, 1991 v.h A "erf/. J : P-7*‘3J 3:-/ A 9.;w*::r pi Vi:t A KA-JC' ^5 X r-c.^ .•! M-c-Jf' T »4 gj .'j 0 v:-;i 1.^’ *:::i;*. ^5 y. C •! V;n J &C *L ^:>f': C ^.u^t A: • T-5.-J1 £ A%.i, rr f-cv^J-S A »»: £(J;r'»'^ •**£ y:*« A $<3 l ?r; 3; Cif«'*r . lira* ?£ Mj't D V13M PS T-c^l * A'^cr-jcn A lA Csy R t/4'>cr. PC. v.f*. 8 jrrje.'V P£ L P-T^ V PS C Pc'^aA AiA y ^3 ^»c ^ *.***/ 0 •f-fl?*' pf Ce:’' s O^'-r* Pt PCSC'V R Dt20^ Pi C»7 W Mo'^ PC HjT't L ^•f'nch. P£ f VI*- pf C-a*cj A r-fca*' U3 y •aA- u/ Ni'vjA V t XfcOn City of Oronti Box 66 Cr>'stal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Ann: Mike Gaffron Re: Robert Suess Subdivision Our File No. 139 - 16S3 Dear Mike: We have reviewed the proposed subdivision for thr Roben Suess proper:>^ There arc several issues that need tc be addressed on the subdivisions. Drainage easements should be provided along all lot lines. Drainage casements should be provided for the existing pond on Lot 3 and a pond to be developed on Lot 3. The storm water runoff to the east should be controlled to that which existed in the undeveloped state. The pond in the northeast comer of Lot 3 should be adequate to store the lOw year storm. The construction of a berm will be necessar)' along the east line to pond the water. Drainage sw-ales should be constructed along property lines. The dramage swale aiong the east line could be moved 25'+ west to minimize tree removal. If the swale is moved additional dramage easements will be required. The e.xisiing ditch on Lots 1 & 2 Block 2 of Daniels Long Lake Heights Addition will have to be evaluated and possibly relocated. The ditch along Water Town Road should be constructed in accordance with City Standards. The new street should be constructed in accordance with City Standards. There should be a temporary cul-d-sac constructed at the end of Outlot "A". Easements should be provided for the cuUd-sac. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRCdh 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 5SII3 • 612-636-<600 • 35th Anniversary • ^ t .*■ - a> t vl vJ S < % * if•V V V ■,'i R5 -.-i . * • .* o 1 . rmwMin 11 I I ■ m Bonestroo Rosene Anoerllk & Associates Engineers & Architects Oro G Bo^^rjo PE ROOPrt W »roser>C P£ C Anoerwi PE L Strva:a PE R<ru:3 E V'nr PE 1 Coo«^ P£ Thomas E Noy-i PE Roc*??: G SchunchL Pf SuW'’ Er*^?tr» C PA A Gowi. P^ R ;harrf W RjtTf PP Donad C >fry A Bouryor P£ Ma'H A Mjmon PL Te^ K Pied PE M :ra^- T Ka^rmann PE Itooen R PE OavKJ O un*dLi PL Thomas Pmori P£ MuThae* C Lv?xn. PE jir^i P WaJhl PE P ^ncjefion. PE Vj'n P R;>'*v PE Rot»Cf: C Pusses Ai A Thomas £ Af^s PL HcMatJ A Sarrforfl PE Dj''-? J Eope'Ton PE K*^'n * Sc;: PE PhAp J Cai»vc^ PE hmaf< Mamnct P£ feta'll D Vl'a'tt. P£ Tromai R Anomon. A.iA Gary P Ry'-anOC' PE ^ti<es B >cnscn, PE L Pnanp Gravel K. PE firnc C PiumarL A1A aoocs M UPy; A iC p Jffy 0 Pf?lZSCh PE Ccc«o 0* v<' P£ ftoocn R DreCKMT P.E Ga'y W Monerv PE O'-n L Wiemea PE Ksv^ R Tape PE Cnahcs A Enc«oo Leo M PaN^vey Hanan M 0«son September 12, 1991 City of Orono Box 66 Ciy'stal Bay, MN 55323 Attention: Mike Gaffron Re: 139-1683 Suess Subdivision Dear Mike: We have reviewed the proposed subdi«sion for the Suess property. We have 'lufficlenrilrruation for'^ review and would recommend the developer prov.de the following: Topography and contours for entire parcel Prel. Plat for the entire parcel Please contact this office if you have any questions, Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC ^y' Glenn R. Cook GROlk 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul. Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 • 35th Anniversary J ? !. :^i 1 •« •* •«»• • • -H* •• •» •* #• «• I 4 • f TTryrr-**' .*• • • n a 5 h) mmrn^\in % Q »fr Kk 1 ttiM -r ■■ II liiiUMltfi'k To;Planning Cominission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Moorse From: Michael P. Gaffron/ Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject September 9, 1991 #1683 Robert Suess, 2590 Watertov;n Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing Zoning District ~ RR~lBf Single family rural residential* 2 acre* unsewered Application - Request for subdivision of 19.7 acre existing homestead to create two 2-acre building sites List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey* Proposed Plat Exhibit E - Staff Sketches; 1 - Existing Dedicated Road System 2 - Proposed Shared Driveway 3 - Future Cul-de-Sac (Conceptual) 4 - Future Connection to Golden V’iew (Conceptual) Exhibit F - Existing House Driveway Options Exhibit G - 1989 Air Photo Exhibit J - Pertinent Comp Plan/Subdivision Code Excerpts re: Road Development Pertinent Facts - 1. Total Area (Excl. Watertown Rd.)19.7 ac. Proposed Outlet A Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 (existing house) 0.6 ac. 2.0 ac. 2.0 ac. 15.1 ac. 2.Lots 1 and 2'have each been tested for drainfield sites. Both lots require mound systems* and each lot has a suitable building envelope to construct a single family residence. The land is open and relatively flat* hence the sites will need to be protected with fencing during driveway/road/house construction. The existing residence has a septic system that is currently functional* and because Lot 3 contains 15 acres* no alternate sites testing was required at this time. ? J-' Zoning File #1683 September 9, 1991 Page 4 The following conditions of approval should be included in your recommendation once all outstanding issues are resolved: 1. 2. 3A. OR 3B. Park fee to be determined per current fee schedule. Standard drainage and utility easements to be taken over entire plat. Drainage plan to be -fuMowetJ per recommendation of City Engineer.^ tTfjT Co^.^erc (If driveway only, with no requirement to move existing driveway): a. Outlot A to remain in ownership of developer (owner of Lot 3). b.Access easement shall be granted over Outlot A in favor of Lots 1 and 2. c.Developer shall execute covenants to define responsibility for want of driveway, and to define future financial obligation at such time that the driveway is upgraded to private or public road status. d.Condition of approval is stipulated that any future development of the property that creates additional residential lots including use of Outlot A for access will trigger upgrade of Outlot A to current road standards. e.Developer to grant City an underlying road and utility easement over Outlot A. If required to do road now, with requirement to relocate existing driveway to Outlot A: a. b. Standard developers agreement required. Outlot A to be shared ownership of homeowners' association, standard covenants required. c.Developer to grant standard underlying road and utility easement over Outlot A; shall be v;ritten to not preclude future connection to adjacent properties. 1 Zoning File #1683 September 9/ 1991 Page 5 d. 4. Temporary cul-de-sac to be platted and constructed (easement or outlot?). Q. PAy/*'er>JT ‘ OF CA7"/0^ Fete. Applicant shall satisfy any Watershed District requirements (applicant advised to contact Minnehaha Creek Watershed District at 473-4224). 5.Protection of drainfield sites via fencing to be in place during road/driveway construction and to remain in place until homes are completed. 6. Dedication of 33' right-of-way for Watertown Road. 7.Address assignments shall be north-south grid with a new road name even if this is a driveway. 8. 9. No building permits until driveway/road is completed No curb cut/access for Lots 1 and 2 onto V7atertown Road except via Outlot A. < I J Zoning File #1683 September S, 1991 Page 2 3.Although neither applicant nor his agent have submitted a letter of requestr staff was verbally advised that applicants propose contraction of a shared driveway in Outlet A to serve Lots 1 and 2, and request that the existing residence continue to access directly to Watertown Road. Discussion The proposed configuration is the logical first step in the future development of this property into as many as eight or nine 2 acre lots (see Exhibits E). The configuration would allow for future development of a cul-de-sac, or for a future connecting road to Golden View Drive if that was deemed necessary at the time of future subdivision. Driveway vs. Road To be consistent with Subdivision Code Section 11.33, fc’bd 4, this is technically a three-lot plat which would requi: , construction of a 24' wide paved private road and cul-de-sac within Outlot A, serving all three lots. It is staff's understanding that applicant wishes to continue using the existing driveway access to Watertown Road for Lot 3, and construct a shared driveway to serve Lots 1 and 2, rather than construct a fullfledged road and temporary cul-de-sac. In staff's opinion, this requires a variance to the Subdivision Code. If this driveway concept were approved, staff would recommend that Outlot A stay in the ownership of the applicant, with access easements granted to Lots 1 and 2. The City would take an underlying road and utility easement. Covenants would be needed to define the driveway maintenance responsibilities of Lots 1 and 2, and would have to further define what financial obligation would be incurred by each affected lot at such time that future development occurs. It would have to be stipulated that any new building lots created on the property in the future would trigger upgrade to private road standards. Exhibit F shows the existing driveway location and t\io possible alternate locations if existing house was required to access directly to Outlot A. From a safety standpoint, the existing driveway is not in a hazardous location. If a variance is granted to allow merely a shared driveway serving Lots 1 and 2, the City should require that any future development which would require upgrading of Outlot A to a private road, would trigger the relocation of the existing dx'iveway to Outlot A. r b ■ Zoning File #1683 September 9, 1991 Page 3 Other Issues Whether or not Outlot A is allowed to be constructed as merely a driveway/ staff would recommend that it be given a street name and lots be assigned addresses such that no address changes would be needed upon future subdivision of the property. Both Lots 1 and 2 would be subject to the Park Fee Ordinance. This subdivision has been submitted to the Public Works Director for review by the Park Commission/ and the City Engineer for comment. There are no designated wetlands on the property. No site grading or drainage plan has been presented/ nor has a topographic survey been submitted. There is a potential for drainage from this project affecting the Hackberry Hill 1/2 acre sewered development to the east. The City Engineer advises that a topographic survey should be required now in order to adequately address the drainage concerns as well as a concept plan for the ultimate development of the property. Issues to Resolve 1.Should the existing house be forced to relocate its driveway to Outlot A? 2.Should the applicant be required at this time to construct a 24 foot paved road with 100 foot diameter cul-de-sac? 3. Have drainage concerns been adequately addressed? Staff Recommendation Given that each lot has sufficient area, width along an Outlot/ and primary and alternate drain field sites tested/ the 2-acre lot standards appear to be met. The Planning Commission must determine whether sufficient justification exists to allow Outlot A to contain merely a private driveway serving two lots at this time/ and if so, should determine what threshold of future development would trigger upgrading of that driveway to private road standards. Staff recommends that full topography of the 20-acre parcel and a concept plan and drainage plan be submitted/ and the Planning Commission may wish to table pending receipt of that'^o information. ^ '1 ' CITY OF OROHO - SUBDIVISIOH PROPERTY LOCATION ' hO ll- i:"::)•••• Site Address 7.T?^ i^^,T(/:rfftc;y property Identification Nuiaoer (P.I.D. ) .<L^- - -^- - - - - - Please check one - Property __>< abstract or - - - torrens. , . ^ . (-7 TV nr nc-nvn Attach legal description^jto applicant Name ~7~* ^ Attach legal description__wu _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- - - - - - - - *” ”” Dhnno ^ho^ne) 4^77 -Phone (home) ^7") -/fisEOiLKKivO fii t L 1 * /• i'J. c-uif Phone (work) V 7J - Lj* I. f t. I Lf f iuLi ^ 'v.'-znivA yOi/f • • •• • Mi.Ci.ai I - . . r,-4-v- zix^2S?S(!yiS^ I^UWAddress: ^A/y'(=cj fr/ief' ______:rJT___1 ___________Jj2J2d/ OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)---- Name /^cp^CAT /T Sc/CSS____________ Phone (work)--------------------------- .. Address: 2 55^ city: ^IL-----Zip: S2SJS£_ (attach list if more than one) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development. Size 19. 9z :2^,2 Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total/’ all parcels 4 Present Use (check)Residential; no. 'of units rjry ^ nj^ Other CTA/Mrr nrrrrr i 1 ':i0200QOb Ql CEH 290.00 _______-fir—-2^. CO RECEIPT-rHA^ YOU a22!9S0 cool >'<01,J12:E Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) ViJ/^3/: Present Zoning nisfcrict _ _ _ _ PROPOSAL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Division for Tax Purposes Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:/Existing Units New Units Total Units > •.. •• • * I Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Units per __ Acres /2 O Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check)Residential Other (specify) MINIMDy MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete." Zoning" Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal ‘plat. Title ooinion.^ • Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III)$150.00 Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement 250.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & "I Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class III and alT’ non-residential) 250.00 300.00 + 20.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or' requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature *7 Date Owntr’s Signatured /^Date Applicant must have al.v submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meec. r. •. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each montn. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building s Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. keasijcij Li-. Mil If ils ■ iiiiiilleii i ■ ~ MirtnH - “r-n -ir n » III rifT^f rAn MrfmjDMi sin III 11 I ■ n I ■mini THH ■ il^ ijTitim ikifif ■ i « t •41 t-6) VIE* (•21 Ut il_ ' «l rtif JlDOa 1; ■ — '*O ' V i % •-/ •/ ^'9 trf ( *5) !(/>■, O' n 'f («4) tl - [ ’fJ • <n‘ I '.ft 1 SE'SUiia"” hWA •V *• *v » ( >0) «*•'«* «r*t «v M /ft • A 'M* ■«* (.VCOCMAVEN i'"DR) SCOOi t’6>( in_ THIM ’ • *1 ^0 / / ^ t 3 ■- I ^ •»»’«• V 1^ nt *"l ‘2 ;i y' .X / f y w*Pi f i *I *41; y,NJ ^\ ; : : N ««) 12SJ S..'.. I r ^ » ~te S ^ ”t2M » /I S • CO) f* It ^ -A.n • ^ u • (33) t tl ' 'ite L3-., . • (32) t nX t 'K •! • (3») -1 ;i « ^ I H •(.'^i i - ^ ^ • ^ U’9> te jJ ”* ; A' - 3 : (»:" 1 ••< .'i n .• ^ i , ^ / .J/..:» A3- t‘0 % ••!•• ‘I -* ;«i ti . I I n^ii ti ■ irt#ii ■ i'>a la J ft RUN DATE 06/06/91 BATCH 006 PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADOR ONNER NAME taxpayer KAME/AODR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER ^CA^€/ADDR PROP ADM ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OI««R NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 09-117-23 12 0002 02695 NATERTONN RD PATRICIA C DICKEY PATRICIA C DICKEY 2695 NATERTONN RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 91 0016 02525 NOOOHAVHN OR C J O'CONNOR I L S 0'C0rtK)R CHRISTOPHER J 0'C0NTK)R AND LYNETTE S O'COTJNOR 2525 NOODHAVEN LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 92 0019 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED D D PETERSON A K L PETERSON DONOVAN D I KAREN L PETERSON 2715 SILVER VIEN DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 93 0009 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGf4E0 J F A M C P VOGT ET AL MIKE HILDELiriC 1120 E NAYZATA DLVD NAY2ATA MN 55391 38 33-118-23 99 0002 02590 NATERTONN RD ROBERT F SUESS ETAL ROBERT F SUESS 2590 S NATERTONN RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 99 0010 00191 HACKBERRY HILL DAVID P FISCHER ETAL DAVID FISCHER 191 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE m 55369 iikdLml 58 0<V-117-25 12 0005 02595 COUNTRYSIDE DR PATRICIA C DICKEY PATRICIA C DICKEY 2695 HATERTOMN RD LONG LAKE HN 55556 58 55-118-23 <♦! 0017 02985 NOODHAVEN DR HARK N HOLF HARK H NOLF 2485 NOODHAVEN DR La« LAKE HN 55556 38 33-118-23 93 0009 02690 NATERTONN RD r P GORMAN ALT GORMAN T P A L T GORMAN 2690 NATERTONN RO S LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-25 93 0016 00038 ADDRESS UTMSSIGNED LILLIAN 8 PETERMAN ET AL LILLIAN 8 A ROGER PETERMAN 7820 LAKETOW RO NACONIA MN 55387 38 33-118-23 99 0008 00185 HACKBERRY HILL R N PERRY ETAL R H PERRY 185 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 99 0011 00125 HACKBERRY HILL P A A H L NELSON PHILLIP A NELSON 125 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE MN 55356 REPORT NO. PI935901 PAGE 18 38 33-118-23 91 0008 02565 NOODHAVEN OR NAM BASHORE NEAL K A MARY 0 BASHORE 2565 NOODHAVEN DRIVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 92 0012 02675 SILVER VIEN DR C A C M KIRKPATRICK GRAY A CHRISTINE. KIRKPATRICK 2675 SILVER VIEN OR LONG LAKE FN 55356 38 33-118-23 93 0005 00120 GOLDEN VIEN DR JOHN HALLSON JOHN T HALLSON 2056 GRAND AVE S LONG LAKE MN 55356 Sr Tf 38 33-118-23 99 0001 02590 NATERTONN RO ROBERT F SUESS ETAL ROBERT F SUESS 2590 S NATERTOFtl RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 • .* '•> ^ •• I i 4 38 33-118-23 99 0009 00155 HACKBERRY HILL PETER IRHIN FOSSEN ETAL MR PETER I FOSSEN 155 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE FM 55356 ^ e 38 33-118-23 99 0012 00109 HACKBERRY HILL KURT C SCHMID KURT C SCHMID 109 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE MN 55356 . ■ 1 ■ ( mAImM rtwittomnciiitiriwi iTi rii iIiu iImi J r RUN DATE 06/06/91 BATCH 006 PROP ADDR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP AODR OHCR NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP AOOR 0»tCR NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR iL. HEtMEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OFtlERS LIST 38 33-118-23 94 0013 00095 HACK8ERRY HILL D 0 PEASLEY ETAL OtMWEATH PEASLEY 95 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE »t4 55356 38 33-118-23 44 0016 00051 HACKBERRY HILL J H HIELKE A R J HIELKL RICHARD J A JANELLE H HIELKE 51 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 33-118-23 44 0019 02480 HATERT0»t4 RD R H HAGHAN A J 8 HAGHAN RICHARD H A JUNE 8 HAGHAN 35 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE HN 55356 33-118-23 41 0010 Johh & Patricia Harris 2445 Woodhaven Drive Long.Lake, MN 55356 33-118-23 41 0003 James Dillman 225 Willow Drive Long Lake, MN 55356 33-118-23 44 0005 Lawrence Gleason 140 Hackberry Hill Long Lake, MN 55356 33-118-23 44 0022 ‘ James & Dana Mock 80 Hackberry Hill LogntLake, MN 55356 33-118-23 44 0023 Donald Siford 96 Hackberry Hill Long Lake, MN 55356 38 33-118-23 44 0014 00081 HACKBERRY HILL DAD DALY DANIEL P OALY 61 HACKBERRY HILL LOf4G LAKE MN 55356 58 33-118-23 44 0017 00035 HACKBERRY HILL R H HAGHAN ETAL RICHARD H HAGHAN 35 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE HN 55356 TOTAL BATCH 006 00025 33-118-23 44 0024 Thomas Pierce 66 Hackberry Hill Long Lake, MN 55356 33-118-23 ‘1 0025 Char - ' 50 Hav:-. - ^ iill Long Lake, MN 55356 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 19 38 33-118-23 44 0015 00065 HACKBERRY HILL DONALD H DAHL ETAL DONALD H A KAREN S DAHL 65 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 33-118-23 44 0018 00035 HACKBERRY HILL R N HAGHAN ETAL RICHARD H HAGHAN 35 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE MN 55356 31 i]P-.23 44 0028 Ellis 2-. . Watertown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 33-118-23 44 0026 William Wear 36 Hackberry Hill Long Lake, MN 55356 33-118-23 44 0027 Mike Ernhart 22 Hackberry Hill Long Lake, MN 55356 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEWEPIN COUNTY DEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY T^TION» TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF.j | . /^Jli hlj liu I DAT EPARintNr Of HKOPtKIT L.. -•..L I, . 1..— f ■ V ^ . . 7 V,."J 1 •►I i8 I u irfTnatBitftfiA EX.STINO LEGAL DESCBIPT.ON, Th. W... Q..,U. ol 0.....r ollh.Sou.P.A.. Op-U, o. MClIOA 33. Towashio 1'8 No.tn. Ran,. !3 Waal ol Ih. 5IH Ptloolpal M-UHao. T*!:“p.r. Ol aald So..!..... ............... IP. SoolMaa. Oo.i... -okP 'La La.l o. «« «... Goa.... .1 .•«. S,p.’...l O..M.r o. Ih. Soulh.... Ooa.1.,. and R.. «... .. La.' » ac. 0. «.« So.........a. Quarter ol the Southeast Quarter This survey Intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location ol an existing house, garage, and barn thereon. It does not purport to show arty other Improvements or encroichments. rt'fiflhiinfitB I III I J Jj f. #. M rJ 1 «T'5y £-! .« Hi fv:>' 1 Cl)*••' >’i »*r^|^ ■ r- . * , t•' »» B 1# *»\ ¥,n ^ ^9 !. .. a - et;PbINSTC^t vn:3"-< »l\V^ ’ **!’1 ■PY- ^•r*.‘i *A»•— —<Ka UM — £9 • 9 S?SUC5< ^ Z* f'3J' -''d? '•» (0^ ■yi^ .tCCC^^VtM ■» «. f ^ I €5) c25) 2 7 k ? X uj»*fy TWl^O »■ ! 'll tvnrirt AW»< 6^...I' PEnXVAil r I '<1 (f*P ; 1 (l^ *szecxb' AOOJi da .'„ (jp * i. dP e 5 G^,;, €S) .v» ' ^ IL I il o^'J * ** t* a /^- • ’ fl, 151 « ■k li s : P«B ( >1 ^ *♦ ’ ':’v» ’ ^ ’rs ^ » ,;,“ : V. •", * ■ WU»» f •. 4 • I (uj ^ .J.I 7 ini * SlaC2>. S ^ '♦* “ © . 1 3 ..dS 5i '"/sj; ^ n<i • M k« 11 A (!«} A / f ©. U •• an»l; » • .5 « B p • »* -•• :fcs\-' »!5>^ asii ■n n ^ • a *r S t ■ • • t • ♦•! I»M ? a tfi-.. *.i.. w.w i.k,- M ••«4 a 1 •# i @ -5 .'fUMaii . ( ) /S33 % 4 — 44— -• •*‘*r ‘ • ‘'‘ » • • I : I . *#..*-• ♦CM* Ct •J-IX 1_.- # I ' • L ♦Xi—i-L.' . _ - - - STC‘»U SEn?^ ^IS^^ICT 5C'Jf4)APT ---------- S>COl. OlSTi^lCT SCUNCAi^T .............. •ATtn^jxo oisTflicr aCwSCAi^T ........... .... ♦•;l*Sfflrf».* r*. h£f#€P!N CC'^tT. ''lf*<50!’* a,p£*o cf puaic ifICE CfPtflTvtNt Cf »*0P£PJT r*» *.S0 fjatc «r css f. //(f exM^ a-Z \ (S3> • 1 f»t# •1 (lit • M. ■ (IP ! s 4 h t • OH • a a (5^ J a !(4i w OP ; _______U4L (£5> ' .•** t I ^U0« ‘ ui*;><®* S -5«‘ " ” mSm *• » 1^ tl4’"'l?‘i ■ If L0* li.* (j.i ini • L3 ..©, ■ — - ---------csr :;i ,/35 ^ 11*» ». ' ■^nar c* a -___i_t r 1 :•%« • i f : ( • j -- ^ •“>•7 » < r ' f • * • <•♦*''' 1 • i • • L ^-!_L~tJ (§)itiXU HI S33 asirs 5TCSU $£*5^ OISTflICT SXJ-C*«»'CKCi Jisraici ecwo*«T *A:£v,f<: oistsicT ac\,f<0AST •• rsci*r».» r-, «/%! Htv^PiN ccuNfY. yir/€SorA 3ijM£Au or ^>*jaic sr^vicE Cf^PAMUCNr OF PR0P£RTf TA jC av 3 i>'jaic ^ ‘S«JS --------------------■^'■* ■ -J .jj r.//#A) .-3 i'ui 1^ ns \ 0 1l 4^ 1 CM «k It 9 ^t*t ^ w«* m ■*• -b ' 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 i % •—" 1 -----------1 _________Llli_______ciiQt ,r.MrT.’^«i ___________ >i^:2Ti:cr*i• ItVT^ » • rn—r.rr-------------------------nj- - 1 M ^ ______ 5 —■■■ r\w jiy- * finsaAM ^ ' l’*! (^P , A • li • 1 * 1 «*uszcc;io «1t IB dEP, iooa f ** Ciil dP s lit m 1 • 1* no 1 dP ! tM m i. OP ; V \ ' I ^ - .O ^ \ t w -*• (0‘-. ■ UL. ^ 1 • j fe)* o V a(S»2 ’ i>* i z n 1 ij ^ f 1 !••©' C»l •V®' ui,©.*2 cii ‘rV rt ] • l«n [— I lii iri 1,'i,- t*t ■ »>t lt*» 1 **». u » 9 • £2 % 4 ini m %■■ 1 *- ' ** ” ^•, k<S>* J^ (ni • •t :i (S>. • in*t^* (i/i • •« 11ci^r * (MI-4 ./SJ . • mi ^ aJ i;n ‘.p.;" » n • Ssvr ■ ' •,» - 0 t%\\ M ns (4^ '•Tr / T M *• • " * >*^^•r|i»ii/ fii* S33 •cati«i J LL1 L L-* • ! < a. ! ^ 1.LXL, - ^ - STORM lEia^R DISTRICT 9CU«aRt --------- 5v»X DISTRICT 9Cu?<0*RT ............ i*T£Ri>-CD DISTRICT 30-*<OaRt .................... **;f«CK»T r 'i t ■* k *1 il ^1» S^f/CPIN CCLNfT. U|.'#<S0r BuMe*u cr Pua ic sfRrfiCE tf^pARTS^Nl Cf PRORERTt Ta ivo p*;aic ^ :rcs • m li i ni• 5'_i iW-f> tl • 3 k® ni2 ‘1 ii • (ir i *«<• 0<i t: In JXa* n ^ ft V LOT 2 I «••»««• ______V LOTI f •!••«»• I® ^ aa^M* U«*.1., QUTLQT A «•*«» kr^TJxrifAl, z 5o H-c Ui % I I <•/' *1* Maaraa. J> •• k ;p5i ^//S77AJ^ t>^\ve{x>Ni J' ••’i • ■'.t : Tf .: i’ /: a . ..a . ar r•i.rji fi : :*/ LOT 2 ______V LOT 1 I 4 I M««« l-Ua, iJuiLor^ •\^ VT $;I *a*a »» •* #1 ■) ttA-t<J^ 4 I nt i -t .0-1^ -ffr ^ « I r LOT 2 t »t»*’** ______V LOT I ‘.i. QUTLQT A ^ \ \ /i ■< «»/ fc« aftTb »> Ataa'.W «• a« > * * • » «•j’ll.UJ X\-/ t I ± t fotZ, c^AJAjec'T/A36 TO OurioT A "n mag ^tm M , ^ fi^*4». V £'3-S#5gi^S mm4^--'’ W N« >f Q- • y ^ ^ • f ■ / _‘ r>^ , •- --r W' . ’y®;*' ;«.•» --4: f-"' ; ~-'V / •*•*■ .■• - * - -FT'** ',S ? »«*r . U ««l • ; . -. • *i-w 4 ’ •% • •* ^ - .. * T b<.•.•.f.-*.^w^:ri cte' t?>^' :**‘t: :“T- .. ’*§ ; R>%. ••* •» L— •» • «H 4, •. *• ^ . -•' * . T' V!-; .. - -.^ 1^ .. :\;‘ ili A«A.— i i.» • 1 ► V Vil^ ■• ^ y;MM - I'•:z*yy' •jLfcaa ^ ^ _. , «*. • . ^ 1 • K *• t ,TO*------»“fe'V 2i^’•r*^ -■»If I""** ^^ <^ • t ’»•-rfmtTtnTmrr r\ r' •4->: V? !••• • V -r •*. — V *. ■at.— *' ^ ------------- - . *iT .• •>:V. .,• ' —« r. y- —•^— /I n u ^ s .IT Ji. f '.f' T R ANSPQRIAUM JUNE, 1980 THF transportation PLAH , 4-vo r,,>rimAter of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area ind cLmercia? centers, and for efficient commuter movement away frora congested, environmentally sensitive lakeshore. The principle components of Orono's Transportation Plan are as follows: 1.DEVELOPING THE RING ROUTE CONCEPT including designation of collectors and^minor arterials to direct traffic away from Lake Minnetonka. 2.DEVELOPING THE SCENIC PARKWAY CONCEPT including tonka parkways for slow-speed recreational access along the Lake Minnetonka shoreline and other scenically attractive routes. 3.DEVELOPING THE PRIVATE ROAD CONCEPT for access to low density rural residential properties. 4.PROMOTING REASONABLE LEVELS OP PUBLIC MTC^bus r»s*’“f!“at?:rrf"L::fnrtlv%"“uhLc :ranslt m^Bes for commuter travel to the center of the Twin Cities region. nPONO'.S ROAnWAY CLASSTFtCATION SYSTEB A commonly accepted way to describe is through a classification system which Plan follows Jhrcnss!fLfi"“system developed and adopted by the Minnesota Department oi Trinsp«i«!in as^pplled to the types of roadways serving Orono. MAP NO 14 INDICATES THE CLASSIFICATION PLAN FOR STREETS AND ROADS IN S^NO This plan Is consistent with the regional transportation plans °nd facilities of the Metropolitan Council, the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Hennepin County Department of litiss ?MS plan is consistent with the roadway systems Ji^^„7SescrtJ^lons and with orono's urban and rural land use plans provide detailed explanations of each of Orono s roa y CMP 7-14 t £11 i 1 h I i ‘ i XPfi|yJ.qPORTATIOrj.JUNE, 1980 principal arterial a Principal Arterial is a grade-separated, high^ canacity, controlled access highway designed to move vehicles through an a-ea not within a community. principal arterials have no local land use access. The only principal arterial near Orono is that portion of State Highway 12 that becomes limited-access east of Orono*s eastern b^ndary with Wayzata. / intermediate arterial An Intermediate Arterial is a controlled-access , moderately high cap-iFity highway designed to move vehicles between cities and in Orono's situation, between the free-standing growth centers and out-state cities west of Orono into the metropolitan area. Intersections are limited and controlled. Land use access is intended to be limited to major traffic generators without direct access to residential properties. State Highway 12 is an Intermediate Arterial through Orono although many access and intersection characteristics are typical of a minor arterial or collector. 7 JURISDICTION: STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH: MINIMUM 100 FEET FOR TWO LANE HIGHWAY MINOR arterial A Minor Arterial is a controlled access, moderate capacity street or highway designed to move vehicles within planning subregions and between adjacent subregions. The Lake Minnetonka Ring Route is a minor arterial functioning to move, principally commuters and truck traffic, from the western Lake Minnetonka communities into the urbanized areas of the Twin Cities. The minor arterial route channels traffic away from Lake Minnetonka to State Highways 12 and 55, and in the near future, to a direct intersection with Interstate 494 in Plymouth. Land use access is intended to be limited to major traffic generators and local str^t . ^ intersections without direct access to individual residences. JURISDICTION: HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH: MINIMUM 80 FEET FOR TWO LANE HIGHWAY COLLECTOR A Collector street functions to collect traffic from local streets and move it to neighborhood activity centers or to intersections with minor or intermediate arterials. Local land use access is permitted but is regulated as to location and number with direct access to be avoided whenever alternative loca1 street access * u a Vi* c j j ^ V- TvarTable ."“Tntersection wTth other collecTors"“are oTteTT confrolled with signals or with four-way stop signs. Traffic usage is moderate. JURISDICTION: COUNTY OR CITY J RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH: 60-66 FEET C.*4P 7-15 i i 'laAJk J • '------liimiiatilnlteita t i itiii uilUftti 7!^ANSPQRTATI0M JUNE, 1980 <;rPNTr PARKWAY scenic parkway is a designation and classification used mil ctt^of M^nLpolis and Saint Paul and applied by Orono to those by the Cities o£ Minneapu _ __ _ _ ^ ta 11 v sicnificantroaarwhici traCerir especially scenic and environmentally significant «e« Of the “ty. The scenic parkway is typically a narrow, cury, slow Kareh nrovides access to recreational areas and special vistas speed road . . volume through traffic and commercial traffic !!nti!ivitv s«nic parkways cannot be rebuilt into higher capacity couect^rr^r minor Ilterills without adversely affecting the nature Ilttll, Ihe scenic quality of the road and/or the Ptoperty righ‘s of abutting landowners. Because of the natural topography of the ar , scenic parkways also provide some of the traffic and local functions of both local and colleci-or streets. JURISDICTION: COUNTY OR CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH: 50-66 FEET LOCAL STREETS. Local streets public streetsJhatJunction^to^provi^ direct access to abutting properties. hnnflq In^er- neighborhoods rather than through traffic between millions with collector streets are controlled by stopping the local street traffic. JURISDICTION: CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH: 50-60 FEET DEAD-END: LENGTH WILL BE LIMITED BY PUBLIC SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS V iPRIVATE ROAD A private road is a privately owned and privately maintaine |fSt%f^d in ?he rural area or within a planned • 'Jelte functions as a local access street. The City will roads be constructed and maintained to City standards. The Cltv Uuire an easement for public ingress, egress ^nd access to all properties but the City will allow the property owners co limit normal use ot road to the^benefitting landowners and their invitees. Private roads Ihl 11 loIatlS “ plaited outlots intended for joint and several ownership by all the benefitted property owners. JURISDICTION: HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION WITH UNDERLYING EASEMENT TO CITY MAXIMUM SERVICE: APPROXIMATELY TEN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH: 30-50 FEET DEPENDING UPON NUMBER OF USERS DEAD-END: LENGTH WiLL BE LIMITED BY PUBLIC SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS CM? 7-16 E I E I I E E I I I E I [ \ \ r -f—fcHfifrn-r i . 1 TRANSPORTATION JUNE, 1980 PRIVATE DRIVEWAY A driveway is a privately owned and privately maintained#t^ne vehicle path between the street and private property. Private driveways shall be subject to access permits according to the classification of the abutting street. Private driveways will not be subject to any public easement or access right, but do require recorded private easements where driveways cross an intervening private lot between the residence served and the street. JURISDICTION: PROPERTY OWNER MAXIMUM SERVICE:1 RESIDENCE TYPICAL; JOINT DRIVEWAYS ALLOWED WITH MAXIMUM THREE RESIDENTS PER DRIVEWAY IN RURAL AREAS MORE USERS REQUIRE PRIVATE ROAD STA IDARDS DRIVEWAY WIDTH:WILL BE REGULATED WHERE MORE THAN ONE USSR IS INVOLVED OR FOR PUBLIC SAFETY PURPOSES WHERE THERE IS EXCESSIVE LENGTH BETWEEN THE RESIDENCE AND THE PUBLIC ROAD EXISTING ROADWAY MAINTENANCE JURISDIC1IONS ARE REASONABLE AS THEY RELATE TO THE CLASSIFICATION PLAN. The State of Minnesota has appropriate jurisdiction over the only Intermediate Arterial in the City. The Hennepin County Department of Transportation has jurisdiction over the only Minor Arterial designated in the Plan. It is anticipated that Hennepin County will assume jurisdiction in the future over the City- built ring route link between County Road 19 and County Road 6. Hennepin County has jurisdiction over most of the designated Scenic Parkways which is appropriate in that these roads serve as access to Lake Minnetonka and to County maintained landings for many County residents who do not reside in Orono. The City has jurisdiction over those Scenic Parkways that are away from the immediate lakeshore, including the access road to the Orono Golf Course. The City has appropriate jurisdiction of most of the Collector and all of the local streets which serve all Orono residents. Certain key street segments liave been designated for Municipal State Aid construction assistance, including: CLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD from County Road 6 to Fox Street, County Road 84 WILLOW DRIVE from County Road 6 to State Highway 12 and from the Long Lake border to Fox Street FOX STREET from Willow Drive to County Road 146 McCulley Road (Ring Route link) between County Road 6 and County Road 19 Finally, individual property owners have appropriate private jurisdiction over those Private Roaas serving only their individual properties. u. 5 11.33 stoppYnV^ea shllf be desjp-ed to provide a maximum grade of two (2)* percent. Where anv street intersection will involve .an.s or existing^ vegetaaoobanks or visibility, the subdivider create a traf-ic vea^tation (including trees) in shall cut such ground riaht-of-way to the extent connection with the grading ^ cicht distance. F The crown o£ all streets, including intersections, shall be three percent (3%) or leso. Subd. 4. Typical section sub\%ade°'(4-6 %"oii°Cla2su!cI- £!on)'"anl ^ly^b^sub^ct change. Soil borings may be required to be determined by the City. Private Street - Re^j^dential R.O.W.* 50 ' Units 3-6 M.P.W.** 24' Section 3" Class 5 100% crushed 3” 2341 Bituminous Surface Over 7 £ ;’1 »28'8" Class 5 100% crushed 3" 2341 Bituminous Surface Public Street - Residential Units 3-10 R.O.W.* M.P.W.** 50' 28' Sec 8" 3" Over lo A 50' 32'8" 3" Maximum Maximum cul-de-sac length - 1,000' number of units on cul-de-sac - 10 Public Street - Commercial or Industrial Units 1+ R.O.W.* 70' M.P.W.** 32' Section 8** CXflSS 4 8" Class 5 100% crushed 4" 2341 Bituminous surface * Right-of-way Width ** Minimum Paved Width ORONO CC 462 (4-1-84) 4 )'f i^IqajW § 11.33 Functional Class Subd. 5. Horizontal and Vertical v-or.-rol. Horizontal Control Minimun Radius _Design Soeed Vertical Control Maxinun Gradien Private Street (residential) 30 MPH Public Street- (residential) Public Street- (cora. & ind.) 30 MPH 40 MPH 12%275 ' 10%275 ' 8%400' Source: City Cede Effective Date: 4-1-3** . 1 1 Q irtr’liisive. reserved for future(Sections 11.34 through 11.39, inolusire, expansion.) ORONO CC 463 (4-1-04) To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator Date October 15r 1991 Subject: #1687 Robert Bilger, 4005 North Shore Drive Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB, Lakeshore residential, 1 acre minimum List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Applicant's Addendum C - Property Ovmers List D - Plat Map E - Adjacent Property Owner's Acknowledgement Form F - Elevation, South G - Floor Plan H - Applicant's Hardcover Fact Sheet, 0-75' Setback Area I - 1 & 2 - Applicant's Hardcover Fact Sheet, 75-250' Setback Area J - Survey K - Staff Sketch Pertinent Ordinances - A. Section 10.03, Subd. 9 (D) lakeshore lot. Allowed = 10' Proposed = 3' Variance « 7' or 70% - Detached garage, street yard of B.Section 10.03, Subd. 9 (E) - Proposed accessory structure at 834 s.f. must be set back 15' from side or rear lot lines. Required ■ 15' Proposed = 10' Variance = 5' or 33.3% Staff Recommendation = 8' (Review Exhibit K) Variance * 7' or 46.6% C.Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - 1. 0-75' setback area ■ 8,864 s.f. Existing per applicant's survey = 456 s.f. or 5.1 % Per site inspection « 576 s.f. or 6.49%* No removals proposed. * 120 s.f. of retaining wall located within 0-75* setback area. Review Exhibit J. Zoning File #1687 October 15.. 1991 Page 2 2.75-250' setback area = 8,380 s.f. Allowed = 2,095 s.f. or 25% Existing per applicant's hardcover facts = 4,093.7 s.f. or 48.9% Per site inspection = 4,165.7 s.f. or 49.7%* (72 s.f. for footpath) Proposed per applicant = 5,216.7 s.f. or 62.25%. Please note 72 s.f. of footpath area is to be removed because of swale to be installed within west side yard. Review Exhibits I, 1 and 2. Per staff recommendation = 5,336.7 s.f. or 63.7%. Applicant proposes no removals except for those improvements to be removed because of new construction. D.After-the-Fact Variance Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Applicants installed a 6' x 32' section of deck (refer to Exhibit J) resulting in 192 s.f. of additional hardcover within the 75-250' setback area or 2.29%. Applicant claims because of severely sloping topography this was an attempt to connect the front and side access deck to the rear deck and entrance to house. Description of Request Mr. Bilger proposes the installation of a detached garage and storage addition in the street yard of the lakeshore lot. Doors have been provided to the side with a turnaround or backout apron provided on the property. A garage structure is allowed 10* from the street lot line. The storage addition presents a soning issue as only garage structures are allowed 10'. Members may determine that that a mixed use structure would require a 35' setback. As structure exceeds 750 s.f., the accessory structure must be located 15' from side and rear lot lines. Structure is proposed at 10' from the west side lot line. Glenn Cook was asked to comment on the feasibility of the limited area for backing out from garage. Cook confirms that the backout apron will not work and recommends that the garage be moved 5' further north. Refer to Exhibit K. Structure would now be located 8* from the west side lot line. Note the improvement project results in 12.55% increase in hardcover. Applicant proposes the removal of portions of boulder wall (60 s.f.) and garage slab (28 s.f.) resulting from proposed construction. 72 s.f. of footpath will be removed as a result of the swale to be Installed along the west side lot line. Cook confirms swale can still be maintained within 8' side yard. L Zoning File #1687 October 156/ 1991 Page 3 It should also be noted that if Planning Commission members approve staff proposal that an additional 120 s.f. of drive will result by moving garage 5' north. Hardcover proposed with staff's recommendation would be at 5/336.7 s.f. or 63.7%. The following is a list of existing or proposed improvements/ the area of each and the hardcover percentage: 0-75' setback area Gravel drive « 392 s.f. or 4.*I% 75-250' setback area Portion of deck constructed without building permit = 192 s.f. or 2.29% Existing garage and storage building =» 319.5 s.f. or 3.8% Proposed storage/workshop addition = 258 s.f. or 3.07% Staff would ask Plannnig Commission members who are able to visit the sight to review the gravel area. Do members feel additional gravel area can be removed now that turnaround is provided in the rear yard? Should the 392 s.f. of gravel area be removed in the 0-75' setback area....will it create exiting problems? Hardship Stat:^aent Review both application form and applicant's addendum/ Exhibits A and B. Applicant notes the shape/ size and unique location of property. In addition the addendum notes the need for a garage to house the family cars during both the extreme cold winter months and summer months. Staff would also add the hardship that over 50% of the area of this property is located in the 0-75' setback area. The property was also developed long before the current lakeshore development standards established in 1975. Additional Staff Ccniients Any recommendation of approval must include either removals of existing hardcover or reduction in proposed improvements to be consistent with previous actions of the City in granting hardcover variances. Isv .Initial Application Fde^TS.OO ^ fscrn.no nor each addrt^S^^'-'variance ) -I /O a 'V' ” n /Hi L"£ > (no change fr 5.NT, After^the—Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 0 0^ ti SP o ^ r4ir /?£fW5 ™.f£ Of£Ji i£.V 22L<?^ i£?a ?t t^ECElPr-THAHK YOU ^223670 cool ■^4 r Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Q'7- // Z'J^^ ^4 CCcS Attach legrl description to application if not i .eluded or required survey. APPLICANT Phone (home) Phone (work) Address N C/y^/T>g> r/r - City; OWNER (if different than ap'licant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address;. City;Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT DSBvOP ,TROPERTY \^ \ Pres^l\zoning District \ \ \ •■''1'“* i ■ \Present Use of Property _____ '.v Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detai..; Estimated Construction Cost £ Bi'it-PlUt. OfiC- VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( ^ Lot Width X 'k Hardcover Side _ _ Rear) Other I HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or praci;ical difficulty resultingfrcm strict enforcement of zoning regulations; Z-tf r - - DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS • Describe unusual properry conditions preventing compliance with Zoning ^ Code Requirements: -* 't'/■ ** C. T"/P^ lOIRED SUBMITTALS ^^Completed Application Form •Certified Property Owners List of^owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County DepaVLTen^^^f^Finance A-a03,^Govt Center v348-3271). TJ-t^lat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4> Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8ij"xll" for reproduction ). TopographicVsuxyey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing ^grade are proposed (proyid^e ^ne copy 8-*<"xll ). 7^ Sketches"'or plans of floor & elevation views ,(provi:de -1' copy aJj-xll ”). "fT) As an^addendum ,to this application, please attach a separate list of —^ aiiy ^ther' persftis youvwish'Yiotified of ^this .application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your veuriance application is not __complete —if—the—above ^nfonllation has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE . The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct.^ the best of his/heroknowledge. ^ Dnte ^/ 9/Applicant's Signature / OWNERS SIGNATURE . ^ The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authoj^zes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agentS7»%Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tiofLend verification.of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submitrals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting.' ^Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. ■'Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant unable to attend a scheduled meeti^, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your pla'ce and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. kbttlii r m sfelson Quality Prxxluct6 RQ boPK:o^Ma)cr. Mn. t/53cO (612) 657-2525 - ihTT-i s J iJ .7 ^ 77-I 9 t"! i,'*. rn ' ) vi' ''vnr;5 /) K ‘7 « «i P VB-f^'i p FP^n'rr r<> P- oo/Z ^ ^ SV^U/J/r^ i ^;crTi&V-£■/-/ ILpi t9 i-'^y^r ff ^ C^^ • r> /f^si /h FPo 3 AFp tM ^ ^r4<^c4/. Fi-r f3 •SUAtn^P n^PFH o Uotej3i-i • ^r/fF. s<^/i pFFtP^ /F F> 7 - f U ‘ A RUN DATE 08/14/91 BATCH 001 PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER I NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 5 - 1 58 07-117-25 44 0005 04005 NORTH SHORE DR SUSAN H NALKER SUSAN DILGER 4005 N SHORE DRIVE MOUND MN 55564 58 07-117-25 44 0066 04000 NORTH SHORE DR R J BREZA a K A JOHNSON R J DREZA AKA JOHNSON 4000 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55591 58 08-117-25 55 0073 0x560 NORTH ARM DR PATRICIA M LANIESS PATRICIA LANLESS 1560 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 55564 58 17-117-25 22 0009 05995 NORTH SHORE DR CHARLES J MACIOSEK H RICHARD ZUCKMAN 1819 DUPONT AVE S MPLS MN 55403 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST j:-. J 38 07-117-25 44 0004 04009 NORTH SHORE OR JANICE F SE6NER JANICE F SE6NER 4009 NORTH SHORE DR M0U4D MN 55364 30 08-117-25 33 0069 03980 NORTH SHORE DR R H ANDERSON APS ANDERSON RICHARD H A PEGGY S ANDERSON 3900 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MT4 55364 38 08-117-23 33 0074 0155;NORTH ARM DR MARGARET PELTOLA MARGARET PELTOLA 1550 NORTH ARM OR MOUND MN 5S364 58 17-117-25 22 0040 DAVID H A HOLLY M EISS DAVID A HOLLY EISS 1635 CONCORDIA ST HAVZATI MT^ 55391 REPORT NO. PI455401 PAGE 1 58 07-117-23 44 0005 04017 NORTH SHORE DR JOHN F THEOBALD ETAL JOHN F THEOBALD 4017 NORTH SHORE OR MOUND MN 55364 30 00-117-23 33 0071 01570 NORTH ARM DR ALICE V NELSON GLORIA J HAGEN 1570 rX)RTH ARM DR MOUND m 55364 50 08-117-25 33 0075 01540 NORTH ARM DR KAREN M NEHSTROM KAREN M NEHSTROM 1540 NORTH ARM DR M0UT40 MN 55364 f f1 TOTAL BATCH 001 00011 1'^ 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE Mffl TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. . 0ATeS||S||^I by f TAXATIWif Miiila ff anfim I I I .. 1 74 ) •1 -4 ** ('2; ^ 'TO _1 if Ji*6d I »*,7'. 4r«' - 1 > ^ 95 J X» 1 W (70) A yjo 1 95 PI >« 1 B 'i HS3 B r30 J •1^ •!. 5 P fP A n ti « C») 2ft SET »* n *m rt I 1^ ”\ A*'’w^"^ (MW’ -: «i /(tzj p aB<i^ (76) «a» • ■*\'V c ^-cft • fc M. ^ 9 illLlZlLs;i<r 11 ^ar^;w \ p / 59 59 9D (M)(»f) ✓..."■r eA- / »<• IVf■» C s 1 i ” ^.> 1 t' •••■✓ “ 5D 80 R 7 {«)-•j *0D B 0 (50) (S^ to ^ iZi)B R II (IS)$ '80 R (54)$ *80 R rj (55)■w * :=7 »■?TJpr?J* S ’4g rs )/..-J J t(tn (45)(44)(O)(4;)(4 T4 s s 5i X «- r4 S 9 £ a:.... 8”S >8 3 *Nd -1 (4t) >9 8 2^ (48)i9)I9C 50 X X X J t*^ J rv *« 9 9 8 8 : (7) “ 1 (6f (397 (37 (2 »91 f ■■■LL,-2L ^ 6 8 7 1^ a. nuct * (^0) ^ > ./,ws K!(D 1@2@ \ ..................i...\ arr ^ \ « 2T1 T» ^ ^ 3) '\ - Y •*••■•••••••••■ Y ^PQ **W jT( • ••• •••«•••-••• • (21) <SS ^ '? ruin 2Si 9 (tn~. <;w = 9 WV <2^ i-tf-X*. m.m- -(^-m,^3g_S ^5 gg (28).......f ”’^.................n5 (27) .n -MS n*k^iC».VM —l^viii*wti •‘“h?—— -.Ti - I •-■•'■■ r-'.*- -. ■S»r*'afT^"*3P^'. ■----- mm Adjacent Property Owners' Acicnowledgenent Fozrm /L I (we)//^Ytr a__________ of / J\rm J) [print nanie(s)][prine aacarass ] have reviewed the plans for the proposed ir.prcver.ent or proposed use of the property located at </(?<?r ^ ’ also referred to as Lar.d Use ADolication No. I (we) understand that in executing this ackncwledger.ent, I (we) air* (are) not as)ced to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely +•0 confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Date Property Owner ************************************** I (we) [print name(s)][print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at _________________________ also referred to as Land Use Application No. _ _ _. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare-approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. t '7 Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE CNE) 75-250 Existing Hardcover in Zone 250-500' 50Q-10C0' A. House Bi Garage c. Driveway 0. Sidewalk E. Patio/ Deck F.Landscape AREAS underlain BY plastic sheeting 6. Other LENGTH _ X _ X _ X _ X _ X WIDTH 4 S . k. Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone 93^ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. _ _ _ __ S.F. 3 5 ^ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F S.F. S.F.B B X 100 =I % " I I . ‘ HARDCOVER CALCUL^TIOil WORKS.-jr^I— : (circle cme ) 0-75' (7:-l;0/ScTBACt'C ^ONE Existing Hardcover in Zone 250-500' 500-10CQ' A. House r. LENGTH ^.0 Bi Garage c. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. P atio/ Deck F.Landscape areas UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other ... ^ ,£ WIDTH X -7 ^ X X X X . Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone f093.1 4 B S.F. 7.S.F. S.F, - S.F S.F S.F. S.F S • F • 7 ^ S.F. S.F. S.F. ^ ____S.F. S.F. S.F S.F S.F I S.F 4d92.l S.F 933d__ S.F X 100 ^ A I /Q HARDCOVER CALCUUTION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE cne) 0-75' (^-250p 250-500' 500-1QC0' E;asTi?t6- Hardcover in Zone A. House LENGTH WIDTH S.F. ‘^^3,3 S.F. S.F, S.F. ’F'- B. Garage ^y-i^ c. Driveway y = f r 3)9, < X ■ O 7 9 • ^ q. i7<4)* 37 7 = e.r i«iri stAC D. Sidewalk 7.^/Z E. Patio/ Deck F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN ?Lvst.c- • SHEETING S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. = • ~7 S.F. = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ S.F. = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ S.F. = S.F. B I I To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Moorse From: Date: Jeanne A, Mabusthr Building & Zoning Administrator October 11, 1991 Subject: #1688 Jim Buranen, 1085 Brown Road South - Appeal - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances Section 540 Home Occupations. Subdivision 1 - License Required. It is unlawful for any person to engage in, or carry on, a home occupation, as that term is defined in the Zoning Chapter of the City Code, without first having obtained a license therefore from the City. Subdivision 2 - Regulation. Licenses will only be issued if the specific use is permitted or otherwise allowed by the Zoning Chapter, and if all conditions set forth in said chapter are fully complied with. Section 1020, Subdivision 4(C) - Home Occupations. Any gainful occupation meeting all of the following requirements when engaged in only by persons residing in their dwelling, when there is no employed assistant, when that occupation is conducted within the principal structure only, when evidence of the occupation is not visible from the street, no signs other than those permitted in "R" districts are present, no excessive stock in trade is stored on the premises, over the counter retail sales are not involved, the entrance to the home occupation is gained from within the structure, and the use does not adversely affect the character of the uses permitted in the district in which it is located. Section 10.06, Subdivision 3(B)(1)(a) - Zoning; Appeals and Adjustments. Appeals to the Planning Commission may be taken by any affected person upon compliance with any of the conditions imposed by the Zoning Chapter. The Planning Commission may hear and decide appeals where it is alleged that there is an error in any order, requirement, decision, or determination made by an administrative officer in the enforcement of the Zoning Chapter. n 1i 1 # Zoning Pile #1688 October 11, 1991 Page 2 The applicant has filed a home occupation license as required of City Ordinances. Staff has advised applicant that prior to staff providing a recommendation regarding the license application, further direction must be sought of the Planning Commision and Council because certain aspects or facts by the home occupation use were questionable although similar to other applications approved by the City. Some of the questionable aspects of the operation involves on site storage needs of the business (storage of four large limousines), drivers come to property to pick up limousines and general impact of this use on lot less than 1 acre in area located in established neighborhood. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit P Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Home Occupation License Application Applicant's Addendum Plat Map List of Property Owners Notified for Appeals Review Resolution #2883 Planning Commission Minutes 9/17/90 Council Minutes 10/8/90 Site Plan Application #1586 Proposed Improvement Plan for Expansion of Home Occupation Abbott Letter 10/8/91 Staff Letter 6/21/91 Description of Appeals Application On October 8, 1990, the City Council granted approval of a side setback variance for a rear expansion to an existing garage to allow the parking of two limousines. At that time applicant had a limo service operated from a Plymouth location and proposed the improvement of the garage to house two of the four limos. Since that time, applicant advises the economy has impacted the operation of his business and he has been forced to house the four limos at his residence. Review Exhibit J, Staff sent written notice advising Mr. Buranen that the storage of the limos and the excessive parking suggested an intensification in the commercial use of the residential property. Mr. Buranen was advised of the need to apply for a home occupation license at which time the City would determine if such a use was appropriate or legal. Mr. Buranen notes (Exhibit B) that the business is still operated from Plymouth and that the two limos originally stored on the Plymouth site could no longer be stored there and would now have to be stored at his residence property. Staff has since been advised by the Orono Police Department that the office referenced in Plymouth is in reality ■> ..Uh Zoning File #1688 October 11» 1991 Page 3 an answering service. Both the Zoning and Police Departments have received calls from residents since the intensification in parking on the property. Mr. Buranen contends that the drivers of the limousines are not actual employees but independent contractors who merely come to the site to pick up the limos. Their cars are now parked to the rear of the residential structure or inside the attached garage. His addendum goes on to note that no assistant is employed within his residence and that he operates his business solely from his residence. Mr. Buranen also advises certain physical disabilities that have made him incapable of regular employment in his former occupation or makes him a less attractive candidate for certain positions. Mr. Buranen has also asked for information on other home occupation licenses issued by the City. Staff reviewed some of the more unique licensee- i r^sued by the City advising of a disabled resident confined to a wheeli/'.air who has a small motor repair operation in northern rural Orono, The disabled individual had to have an employee on the site to assist him because he could only operate the business from a wheelchair. Staff also reviewed the various contractors who have home occupation licenses where equipment is stored in the interior of accessory structures and some of those businesses have employees come to the site to pick up equipment. Staff acknowledges the majority of these contractors are located in the rural areas of the City where large accessory structures have either been installed or were on the property at the time of the acquisition of the property. Review Exhibit H. Mr. Buranen proposes the installation of a garage to the rear of his property that would sustain the two additional limos. Based on current standards of the Code, this can be realized without the need of variances as follows: Total lot area = 34,944 s.f. Allowed lot coverage = 5,241.6 s.f. or 15% Proposed with accessory garage = 2,781.8 s.f. Note all required setbacks are met for an accessory structure over 750 s.f. Proposed at 840 s.f. [15' setback from all lot lines] Please note no hardcover ordinances apply for this property. Staff has reviewed the questionable areas of the home occupation licence application as proposed by applicant with the applicant and advised that staff could not issue or recommend approval as presented because of the many questions raised when reviewing the various standards. Staff would suggest that the Planning Commission review those standards: Zoning File #1688 October 11, 1991 Page 4 1. 2. 3. Is the home occupation conducted within the principal structure? Is the home occupation visible from the street? Note applicant is proposing all limousines be stored within interior of existing garage and proposed garage. Does the use adversely affect the character of the surrounding residential neighborhood? Description of Hardships review applicant's addendum Exhibit B. Staff would also call your attention to Exhibit I, a^ letter from a neighboring property owner notified for this review. Planning Commission Action To provide a recommendation of denial or approval of the Home Occupation License. JJ.ACITY OP ORONO gj P.O. Box 66f 13*0 So Brown Rd Crystal Bay^ MN 55323 '*• 0 ^ ^■^llcation Date; _bate License Approved;^ Date License Expires: ________ • . f «■ _____fCrystal Bay^ MN 55323 ___niLTLrrTmj TTnmSE In'*•■'■ al* Review Fee - $~0.0aSlICATION POR annual home occupation license Fee - $10.00 Type of Business to be Operated;\ I /'I \ > n U1 <2.c’ License -,y be revo.^ ^ ‘ Usnent « e“ ena “d “l:o^S (10: is requxred by City staff/ si4-!r»n with staff reconnnendation will be SSSn!ea^;re*Se the next re^lerly scheduled neeting held on the second and fourth Monday of eacA mont^ ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON HOME OCCUPAnONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 4 (C) ncMrc FitlANiE GFFIlE Prohibited Home Occupation Practices. 50.00 1. It is unlawful for any business operating as a engage in operation without proper licenses. m4000 COOl All persons engaged in the business must, reside in uhe dwe«l-ng. NO commercial signs permitted other than signs permitted in the residential zone. 4. 5. No-excessive stock in trade may be stereo on the premises. Over the counter retail sales is not allowed. 6. Entrance to the home occupation must be gained from within the Structure. ^ ________„__«-»=»=i=======»========*=»»“=‘®*'‘=“*' The undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions Orono Municipal Code and any additional conditions the C.Tty may . - • Signature of Applicant;Date; POR CITY USE ONLY; After review of application, sta recommends following; _____ Approval cf License ______ Den..al o- L.. — the Signature of Zoning Official; Signature of Fire Inspector Date: Date; Atski a J ;: O- August 22, 1991 • f *-• Dear Orono City Council Members: In June of 1990 we purchased property located at 1085 South Brown Road with the intention of storing two of our limousines at our residence. We applied for and were granted a variance to build an addition to our garage to house the limousines. Due to the poor economy, we have since been forced to cancel our off-site storage for our two additional limousines and have had to keep them at our residence. Business has not been what we had expected. We cannot afford to pay the storage fees, nor can we afford to decrease our fleet by selling the limousines. We would like to request your approval to build a two-car, 28' X 30’ garage in our back yard which will not be visible from the road. We expect to obtain financing to build the garage to match our house. You have informed us that we must apply for a Horae Occupations License. Your letter stated that we have five limousines and that the business is run entirely out of the residence. Actually, we have four limousines and have a separate office located in Plymouth. Our limousines are stored, cleaned and serviced at our residence and we do take calls at home when not at the office. Our phone lines are forwarded to the Plymouth location during the majority of the business hours. Our chauffeurs are not considered employees. They are independent contractors who simply come to the residence to pick up the limousines and go on the run. The drivers will park their personal vehicles in the same location where the limousine was parked. At no time would there be more than four cars as the individual driver's car replaces the limousine. We have instructed all drivers to park behind our house or in the garage. In addition, we have asked friends and family to do the same. We do, however, own two personal cars of our own. We sincerely pray that you approve our proposal to either obtain the Home Occupations License, if necessary, or continue to allow us to store the four limousines with the added garage. We have explored our options and have failed to arrive at any other feasible alternative. Jim made the decision to start a business of his own once it was apparent that he was not physically able to gain employment. Jim's career as a truck driver ended in 1986 when a teenager rear- ended him, causing a life long back injury. The accident put Jim in traction and caused three herniated discs and two crushed discs in his back. Physical therapy for an entire year has left him limited in his ability for physical labor. After the accident Jim disbursed over 100 resumes in a two year period. Once the prospective employer was informed of the back injury, Jim was denied employment. As you are aware, the Council has previously granted a variance for the Horae Occupations License to another Orono resident with a disability. We believe that if we are forced to sell two of our limousines, or if we are unable to remain in the limousine business, we will not have the ability to support our family. Lori is employed as a Paralegal, but her income is not sufficient to support two children and two adults as well as making the mortgage payment. Because Jim's ability to gain employment is limited by his handicap, one source of income would leave us destitute. We are very happy in our home in Orono and would like to stay here for many years. Our children are enrolled in the Orono Schools and we are extremely pleased with the quality of the school system. We are also planning to become members of a local church. We want to settle in Orono, however, the uncertainty of our future here has left us in limbo. As we are sure you have noticed, we have done extensive yard work since we purchased our home to improve the appearance. We would like to make more improvements to the property as well as some eventual remodeling of the interior if we are able to stay. We have spoken to several of our neighbors who have no complaints as to the limousines. We have not caused any traffic problems and we feel we have improved the appearance of our neighborhood. Please allow us to continue to raise our family in our present home. Our family's future depends upon your decision. Thank you. tyay yours,_ _ _ Jim Buranen & Lori Reineking 1085 South Brown Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 473-4119 ! ♦ • m ^ ,• X « .-^-y- ■ ;■ -■■•';■■;• • . . ..• .. . •.. J* ’ ■ • •*_____y * . '.;-.v*.’'V • ■« .: —r;^:r-v^ ::X'(X.X. . <x f • • 1 . • 7.»-=► r.«» • * 1 .. •. • ‘^'* ■ i ■ ■ ‘ =■ r > *- •. • . . •. !• ^ • • •. •. . V *..• . ♦t iHAr finr IQ iOf 10. a.« I. uTi4^ vict nuj v«offo SIMUr U4J HICT —1_ s ? LI II H) ^ MO 5| .• /•.• J--V. Jr • 1*0 X.' a l4Q *’ " .i, « / * I* a * 9 in» iiu4 f.L/: > 5 ^e?. f' TO. M U) .../i,<!hr T7- • •> Y***.»*«^'*^r*^v^ I * • T . ’ • * "T7V? * ,.. .. , — , . ;• • • • . *.----------- ---------- OullOl t (16) „ 5%/ ■ i4 * f “ (4) s (14) • •• \ (M) Property owners list for 1085 Brown Road South. 10-117-23 13 0001 James Abbott 1000 Brown Road South Wayzata/ MN 55391 10-117-23 24 0002 Steven VanDeVerie 1045 Brown Road South Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23 24 0004 Abe Christenson 1105 Brown Road South Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23 24 0005 Rod & Sharon Batzloff 1115 Brown Road South Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23 24 0011 Harold & Irmi Freund 1110 Willow Drive South Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23 24 0032/33 Shirley & Vera McWilliams P.O. Box 21 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 City of OROINO CITTV: OF ORQNa RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 2883NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING AN AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE #1586 follows: 111.54 feet to the point of beginning, (hereinafter uhe property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City the existing garage located 6'6" where the addition wilx be 64 instead of the required 30' setback. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1, This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1586. 2. The property is located in the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 17, 1990, and recommended approval of tne after-the-fact variance based upon the following findings: A) The proposed addition will encrjjach no closer into the substandard setback area than 2". B) The fee owner of the property located at 1045 South Brown Road has submitted a written statement noting that he has no objection to the proposed addition t the garage. Page 1 of 4 : 1 CITY OF ORONa3 City of OFtOIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 2883NO. to othe/property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of uhe Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5 The City Council has considered this application safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants an Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the construction of an addition to the existing garage that i be located 6'4" from the north side lot iiria instea required 30’, subject to the following conditions; Al°="n! 2. Applicant shall obtain a building permit the proposed addition to the existing attached garage. Such permit shall not be subject to penalty fees. 3 Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (October 8, 1991). JondIiL^%^^o%\°h^s%«L-nirs^^\"rcrnftiru^^^ gri.reS"rerfin:^ndih\?rrpurisL"breTs"r^^^^^^^ Page 2 of 4 1 •i —.-O -» 1 /V LL. CIXV I QF JoRONa City of OFIOINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 2883NO. 5. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf the property. Minnesota ’^at a*'rtguLr'’mee‘l\n^g held“n the 8th daV*" of October; 1990. ATTEST: Theres^ L. Naab, Deputy Clerk Edward J. Cari-lahan, Jr., >ctdhg Mayor nih i / / f^/u/TA •i^'Property Owner {s) ^ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on on behalf of the City. fim T Notary Public Page 3 of 4 UNDA & VEE NOrANr PUMJC • MMNOOrA HBINEPtN COUNTY Mlf i M, ^ i • •• • • * • * » u. CITY I QF I ORONO I k Stit. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 2883NO. STATE '^^mSNNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS. ) a-nd^r^sa^ro^nty7;^rsoi ”^ appeared ____□? , ■ --------------—^ „.rIon'ir?dlsViberf' rn and who^ eVecuted thi known to me to « ^l-vnnwl ^»daed that he (they) executedforegoing instrufmt, and acknowledged tnat ne y/ the same as his (their) free act and deed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this _ __ day of , 199 , before me a Notary%3bTiF;Jithin and for said Count— personally - to he the^_pe7^n(s) descrroe. rnme to be the Pe^^onCs) descrioea x» executed STATE OF MINNESOTA ) NOTARY PUBLIC )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ^ , 199__f before me a Hot«y%^bTI5-SitKn and for said Count ”personally ap^P^^red „e to be the person (s) described a" a"d foregoing instrument, and acicnowledged that he (they) erecut the same as his (the-r) free act and deed. notary public Page 4 of 4 r:4 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 17, 1990 ZONING FILE »1585-CARLSON be able Chat unless sonethinc was cone to s.op lu, to access the dock, vie constructec tne wal- -n t... 1..3. Bellows said, "There is an obvious need for the wall." Hanson concurred with Bellows. j u 1 oia/c; ssconGGci bv CohGii f to jTGConiniGnci It was moved fa'<.t conditional Use Per.mit for a approval ® A^ ^ndition that the appropriate frnes for wooden seawall, with the ooncici ,-plication are paid. Hanson the after-the-fact nature of ^^“^ttic fmpact of ?he lakeshore #1586 JAMES S. BORANEN 1085 BROWN ROAD SOUTH after-the-fact VARIANCE i-i p m PUBLIC HEARING 7:09 P.M. TO 7:13 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication ana Ce duly noted. irtificete of Msiling were Mr. Buranen was present. ciimmflrized the pertinent facts relating to this She asked Mr. Buranen how long he has reside inMabusth application. Orono. 7 • •'T lived here two months.Mr. Buranen replied, i nave iiveu j ..u,*. Mr- Rnranen ceased work inunediately Mabusth stated -„^®d “Sra oermit. She said, "The after being notified or tne neea provided us with a applicant applied a . ^ reviev/ of the application, survey of the Property* There are several staff determined that a ^ By the time a formal lot lines 4e cltv ^itorne^y will have provided 5!re=uras^U wl^ihn'ine relitive in this case." Bellows seated that she ia concerned^about^^th of Mr. Buranen backing the limous , .rnace I believe that itVe lpprove^flocatlon"to"h^ vehicled, we should also require that a turn-around be providea. „ "T have removed a considerable amount of brush^iromTnr fre^^-at^^Tend of t.he driveway to improve visibility. '• Bellows asked, "How do you feel about a requirement to pjfovide a turn-around? ■. - 4 - 7^ . ij r. ....... ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 17, 1990 B^lnen^ °on' t bal^ up'^'into^Le yird a\°d "position the'cL%o'^ I^arpull straight ahead. In the evening hours I have never had any problems. There were no public comments regarding this application and the Public Hearing was closed , ,.v,a4. ae lono as the appUcant has indicatedCohen stated th ^ turn-around. He that he has no problem, h 1 ane„ recognizes the potential gon:''^o f”aV afirremove tL brush from the enh of the driveway." around is needed. Bellows asked Kabusth whether City staff has reviewed the safety aspect of this. Mabusth replied, "No.” Bellows suggested that the Public Works Director be asked to look at irrslte^rior to Council's review of thus apolrcatron. Tf v/as moved by Cohen, seconded by Bellows, to recommend additxon to a prxn(--t' drivewav bv Citv stafr ^rTt^"rMr\^°"^hT^ffet^^«r-us of this condition. Motion, Ayes-6. Nays-0. Motion carriec. #1587 ROBY L. SIFORD 96 HACKBERRY HILL after-the-fact variance t, m PUBLIC HEARING 7:17 P.M. TO 7:25 P.M. -f- ^ Mailing wereTn« Affidavit of Publication anc Certificate oi wnxxx y duly noted. Mrs. Siford and her son. Bill Siford. were present. Mabusth suggested that Mrs. Siford be given an opportunity •to explain how this situation arose. Bill Siford said, "We were under contractor had applied for the 1 that the City inspectorStSp^^I braid ^Sfd-rthrde^rsf t : l % e t fr m the stig i\\re=VorTodry.-srr-r^ ^sirre^iid^or^^e?i“oSr ^ — c - 1#| m “ilMi, L ^ 'ih—nr— mvt^^ ntrt—— ■■ i ■ n si -i,- - .VCV-* i i» ■ » -« HV-Wk •. k#M AiJi^T®aik riwii^ 'w J •'•ORCNO aSGOLAH CSCSICTi .’ffiST-lG 33L3 CCTOB2R 3, 1990 SONEIG ?I13 #1579 - G3RB5 SVERSOH COBIEni™ « T wou’'^ b« i.-.clir.ed t= t-'--s= c=r.csp=-^al a?pr=va appLcltlcr. as var.ad by «e chancas they proposac. T ^ ex ftm W A* iM'AA'aW 1-1 w .to enoiiif’ he sent back to the Pianninc thayVava^mcra tima to devalop the tiaws on this and to consider the neighbors. Goetten asked if tiie Planning Conuaission initially denied this request and it had been. ai_ua,r» anr^'T r’a'ted that the natter of the .e«o/aro?%raTi^= "^nd^ir.a^tS^r^ro^dsattin, hatdootat is ot concern. It was moved by back to the CounciImember Nettles, to se -^ Planning I3 Nays-1. ‘ Councilmember Goetten votedproposal. Motion, Ayes-J, Nays 1. Nay. Motion passed. #1585 C. ARNOLD CARLSON CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BBSOLDTION #2882iDTion ».6ooA r-i’-^sc” were treseMr. and Mrs. C. Arnold Cito-sc.. - City Adminisv-ator Barnharts „ expl^a^ad t^^ Irns^tui^TrS^lB-: =cra^V^a“-inTcWssion has taco.s.andad approval Goetten stated that this seems like a fairly straight!or’ward application. hv Ac*ina Mayor Callahan, seconded by :ouncilm^ir “peterson; ^o adopt ® 11588 JAMBS BORA .085 BROmr ROAD SOOTH jpBBB-THB-FACT VARIANCE tBSOLOnOH #2883 r^T-i Beinekinq were presentJames Buranen and Lori Reinejcmg t* City Adnioisttatot Ber^dson JJ* of clef auBiiary of this »PPi^““°“Vati«crnaeded is for a side a addition to the garage. Works Director,, advisesJrd setback. John Gerhardson, Public Works^D^e^^ Commission [»t a tumaroi^d would ja addition, Mr. Buranen is as recommended fee on the building h«“\XrVa^^^ a penalty fee for the ORONO REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 8, 1990 ZONING FILE #1586 - JAMES BURANEN CONTINUED variance ($350.00). The work on the garage was stopped as soon as he was notified. Habusth replied that the building code vnn are in a substandard setback from a lot line/ a firewall l reauied as there could be a structure within 10' at some future tSe Therefor” °t mikes no difference what is on the ad:acent lot. Peterson clarified that the Public Works Director advised that there should be a turnaround even though the Planning Commission did not recommend this. Mabusth agreed but stated that a member of the Planning Commission did ask for the review of the Public Works Direct ^nd a recommendation to Council. raiiahan asked if stretch limos were longer than average vehicles He also verified that they turn around by backing out onto Broin Road. He asked where a turnaround would be placed on the lot. Gerhardson replied it would have to be on the front yard, somewhere between the house and the road. Peterson noted that this is a 30 m.p.h. zone and on a curve. Bernhardson stated that the turnaround could be as little as a backup apron and Gerhardson agreed* Callahan reviewed the suggestion that in connection with granting this variance that Mr. Buranen be required to build a backup apron Mr. Buranen replied, -I don't ?®=®“®|^used''Ibacked UD onto the road and never had a problem or oausec a T<- is a 30 m.o.h. zone with a corner coming up to it. S”e driVen“an is’-whe^ler for 7 years over the road and I know how to back up." Callahan stated that the Engineer believes this is an unsafe thing to continue to do. Gerhardson added that it would be consistent every other property to the south as they also have backarounds. Callahan noted that Mr. McCourtney was forced to have one so that he would not be backing out onto Perndale Roa . MS. Reineking asked for clarification of the surfacing and ORONO REGOUVR COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 8, 1990 ZONING PILE #1586 - JAMES BDRANEN CONTINUED Dlacement of the turnaround. Gerhardson stated that it would not have to be cement, that a gravel surface is acceptable. Mabustn addid that it would also need to be maintained in the winter. SethLdson also added that it would need to be an all-weather surface, not just grass. Callahan responded that the general feeling of the Council rotd""f,"'’ro't fa¥=e ^'^itfnT^ManT'ti-s rrScove“r vMiances have been granted just so that the person will have a space to turnaround safely. It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, “«"^^by alte^-^he-faot vtriancl "^Saiting "the double fee on the building but als^requiring a turnaround to be approved by staff 5f sufficient size and all-weather surface to accomodate limousines. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. #1587 RUBY SIPORD 96 HACKBBRRY HILL AFTBR-THE-PACT VARIANCE RBSOLDTION #2884 Mrs. Ruby Siford was present for the review of this application City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed after-the-fact variance regarding a ® nrincinal structure and accessory structure for a deck. ?nspeo?«s hid nored that there^as being done without a permit and put a stop work ThI were out there, discussion regarding a deck took place. ine contractor went ahead and built the deck without a permit after be^nrtord trstop within 5«. Although the building code only ?eiu±res a 5' separation, the zoning code requires a 10 seoaration. Given the fact that the contractor did not come in for a building permit, there was no zoning ^^°^®The oSner was not apprised of all of this by the contractor. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the 5 Mabusth noted that Mrs. Siford has not yet and she is asking for special consideration of the Council. .. Mrs Siford stated that she and her son had discussed putting a firewall in the garage and would put one in the she . jr Mabusth stated that there is a shed that has not been noted ^ ^lU'i c n (.i^U-CO K nib OTYCf ORCNO Ed 0^0 /Y<// 'Oi-cY^'i- Vyvyyn ,CJx 4-^ /. 'i.^. M->-'<^^'‘-^ Ji'i'^'^! CCtrY-c 9 • _ / / TTC? /a^.y.AA^ i'tUj 't^t^-6‘-^-y -f/u Ax^'u'tz:^^ -)c^ V AjMjzA rti & i^vr^^^Mi ^J^U ‘4 PL'ItF’UiAiAlfc.i I-I'*|X-^I o o CiTYof ORONO *.> ON ^ • k I • \'^ • ' . V< '.V Municipal Omces Post OfRce Box tj6 CnsuJ Bay. Minnesou 55323 • June 21, 1991 James S. Buranen, Jr. 1085 Brown Road South Wayzataf MN 55391 Re: Home Occupation Dear Mr. Buranen: In October of 1990 the City Council granted you a construct an addition to your garage to house limos ^ business. At that time you represented jf/stor^^ operated from another location with 2 ,^at timf in the garage when the addition was complete. the business has grown to 5 limos and is g® revealed anthe residence. A site inspection on June ^Or 1991 reveale an excess of activity on the residential property. There were limos and 5 other cars on the property. As we discussed, your original use was minimal (parking 2 limo site). Your current usage is in violation of City { Therefore, the City must require you to return to your original proposed use or apply for a Home Occupation License and request City Council to aporove your current use. Enclosed is a Home Occupation License aoDlicable Code sections for your review. You ^^'’resolie this matter before July l^ T/you have"^ln^ this deadline, the City may issue citations. ^ ha questions, please feel free to contact me at my office. Sincerely, Lyle Oman Building Official Enclosures: Home subd 4(C)Code Section 5.40 ana 10.20, suoa. ‘M'-j cc: Jeanne A. Maburth, Building & Zoning Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrat Bruce VanCr Field Inspector telephone-473-7357 • FAX-473-0510 LO/lsv r To;Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Adr.inistrator Moorse From Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:October 16, 1991 Subject: #1689, Terry Sadler, 1396 Baldur Park Road Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IC, Single family lakeshore residential, 1/2 acre, sewered Application - Request for hardcover and side setback variance to construct a 10'x26' three-season porch in place of pre-existing 12'x26' upper level deck. Pertinent Code Sections 1.Section 10.22, Subdivision 2: Limit of 25% hardcover in 75- 250' lakeshore setback zone. Existing/proposed = 39.6%. 2.Section 10.24, Subdivision 5(B): Side yard setback required = 10'; Existing/proposed = 9,9'. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit P Exhibit G Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Hardcover Calculations Construction Plans Documentation from Past Building Permits and Variance History of Property This lot was granted a lot area and width variance in 1983 subject to a hardcover limitation of 2,280 s.f. The building permit for the house was issued on the basis that applicant would put in a non-hardcover type driveway, using a porous paving material. At that time porous gravel driveways were not generally considered as hardcover. In 1985 the property owner requested and was granted a permit for a 10'x26' deck/porch, and that permit was issued subject to "removal of hardcover driveway and apron to be replaced with porous pavement". No details as to how this was to be accomplished were indicated. !■ ilii III! ifllbli fMW I m r*f- Zoning File #1689 October 16, 1991 Page 2 The construction in 1985 apparently never amounted to more than an upper le-el deck, which was shown on a 1989 as-built survey of the property. Currently, the applicant proposes to replace the existing deck with a fully enclosed three-season porch with a deck above it. Upon staff review of the site, it was found that the driveway had reverted from a previously tacitly approved gravel driveway to a bituminous paved driveway, which is without question considered hardcover. Pertinent Pacts 1.The existing house is 9.9' from the side lot line, and the proposed three-season porch is proposed to maintain that 9.9' setback. 2.Hardcover existing on the property on 10/16/91 is 3882 s.f. or 39.6% in the 75-250' zone. Hardcover orginally approved for this property was 2280 s.f. or 25%. The original zoning application does not include a sketch or diagram indicating how 2280 s.f. was arrived at. 25% of the 75-250' zone is currently calculated by staff at 2452 s.f. The difference between the existing 39.6% and the 25% allowance is just over 1400 s.f., an area equivalent to the paved driveway. Discussion This is certainly a case where ever-changing interpretations regarding hardcover result in hardcover excesses over time. One can argue that the house should never have been approved with the porous pavement scheme, however, during the time period in which the permit was issued, porous pavement was considered as an innovative way to deal with hardcover. Some time after 1983, when it was found that porous pavement was not a realistic solution for functional driveway maintenance, the City quit allowing it as an alternative. In the meantime, Sadlers' coarse gravel driveway was allowed to persist, there being no reasonable alternative. Applicant paved the driveway without the need for a permit. If applicant asked the general question of anyone at the City "Do I need a permit to pave my driveway," it is likely that he was told that no permit is required but he has to stay within the confines of the existing hardcovered driveway area, and if such a question was asked, it is unlikely that anyone on staff related to the fact that this specific gravel driveway was suppose to be "non-hardcover", because in recent years, all gravel driveways have been considered as hardcover. Zoning File #1689 October 16, 1991 Page 3 Certainly, the driveway as it exists is very minimal and constitutes the least amount of hardcover necessary to accomplish its purpose. In the scheme of things, the question that now needs to be asked is whether the applicant should be allowed to construct a 10'x26' screen porch where he had been permitted to have a deck. Applicant has removed the deck already, and second story glass doors walk out to an 8* drop. Average setback is not an issue. Lot coverage including the three-season porch is 1,892 s.f. or 13.8%, meeting the 15% limit. All the proposed construction is out of the 0—75* setback. There is no 0- 75* hardcover. There are areas of rock and plastic on the property that can certainly be removed. These are all in the 75-250* zone, and constitute approximately 326 s.f. or 3.3%. Removal of these areas would leave final hardcover at 36.3%. The driveway cannot be further reduced without losing its functionality. There is no other hardcover on the property to consider for removal. Issues to Consider 1.In the context that interpretations of what is and what isn*t hardcover have changed since the house was built, what is a reasonable amount of hardcover for this property? 2.Does the applicant have a hardship in having been allowed to construct a deck in 1985, removing it in 1991, and now having unsafe doors exiting 8* above grade? 3.How does the recently paved driveway factor into this request? Should the applicant be required to make his driveway "porous** if he wants to have the 10*x26* screen porch? Is there any way to realistically accomplish this? 4.Should this application be considered in the context of other variances which have been granted to similar sized lots on Baldur Park Road? Certainly, staff can provide data for a number of hardcover variances granted in this neighborhood in the last four or five years. n** * city op ORONO — VARIANCS APPLICATION n ft .iff /.ff Initial Application Fee $175.00 ^ ($50.00 per each additional variance) / Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application ^ee) JL .<y e1 •€ r^r.'nkltl Ujk I t r>l U‘IU.lTurV •f'Y-j^AVv-r ,-ccTrc i T^*f > vrtr a v'v w'v ■H (TV* UM» ( ( PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address —3^ ?«• (Vt ruzrv " ~r i /'S:* ,V. iii inf I I fi.'/niTM f WU* «•" • -..If .’i rr>n i Cfj f /iprr4.*--?vav CrvvA 0^/1 l'// PT-r>nortv Identification Number (P.I.D.)-----------------------——-— Attach legal description to application if not me uae on required survey. _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ^“7 Phone (home)applicant^o Name ZT^eei;Phone (work) Phone (home)_ _ ___ _ _ _ _ __ Address f different than applicant) irno / 1 Name -L-^-l=d=Lt^:^Phone (work) !^e>^Z Address Date Property Acquired Sot^tltSLb_Zip: (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land^ PRESENT OSE OP PROPERS Present Zoning District Present Use of Property !<> Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in details—' Estimated Construction Cost $ variances required _ _ _ Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front ^ 0*1 7^ Hardcover Rear) Other » i t.f?fiffi^ <* E/c^^iS- jj^'Arp ^ __fT^jl— (PC<u^.— ouStionI)BS frPTTON OP ONDSDAL PROPERTY «-unuxr. „ D^cribe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with .oning Code Requirements ___________ J. tEQOlRED SUBMITTALS •• c^r^ifi^d Xtrf/owne^ List of owners within ISO' (you .ust obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with surveyor) to include Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed y hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8!i xll for ^:^:^raphir’survey (existing and in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8 x ). Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 =°Py AS an addend.L to this application pl;-i- any other persons you wish notified Ov - applicate. . Additional items as may be requested cy w-ty staff. nformabion has not been included. agrees to provide all •ouested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fe iSi not cLered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses purred irrevYew of this%pplication, and certifies that the information upplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Signature^^^;:_^Date J!If!^nerT^y ackowledges and agrees to this application and further IVrTzes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants : uthorizesgMtaT'comilision members,' and Council members for purposes of investiga :ion and verification of this request >wner’s Signature Cc:,.u /In _____ f r pplicant must have all submittals into the City offi -as 25 days before the ^ning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are bird I? an applicant is r «tVnd“ a“:he“Leting, please lathorired agent attend in your place and to advise the Building a )f£ice of this change prior to the meeting. ifflAWBEroiKA t 1 north arm ' # i ■ •* ■.**'. V. . *. ^; ** * ’ • • V .. - : . •: » • ■ -'% *♦ . • •’ • ^ * * • I * .r t * A ‘ - ' . . ^ r t’U*'. . * m‘ .,1* • ,.• * * *'•**’ • *'; ‘ i -• n^. . . * <• • '..*• •■■“ .• - * *. ■■.* ’ ’ • ■ \ * *•* .f \ *^' ^ . • * * ‘ . ; '.. v^i ^ •• •.• >.' ' \ \'*V • • *r • . • • • L .• • •.r • •• s V V 't *- -• • ■-•. . »-.••• ^ . ... V ** *• r • i r , RUN DATE 09/16/91 y HEhilEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST BATCH 002 PROP AODR 0#CR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 06-117-23 31 0001 01400 BALDUR PARK RO CHARLES B REID CHARLES B REID 1400 BALDUR PR RD MAYZATA HN 55391 PROP AODR ONMER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 36 06-117-23 31 0004 01364 6ALDUR PARK RD D I V KEESLIN6 JR DONALD/VIRGINIA KEESLINO JR 1364 BALDUR PARK RD MAYZATA MN 55391 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 36 06-117-23 34 0017 01406 . BALDUR PARK RD JAMES P WERNER ET AL JAMES P WERNER 1406 BALDUR PARK ROAD MAYZATA MN 55391 38 06-117-23 34 0031 PROP ADDR (Mtf R NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 00036 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING SERVICES ESTATE OF EDWARD SPINOLER C/0 LARKIN» HOFFMAN, DALY 7900 XERXES AVE S SUITE 1500 BLOOMINGTON MN 55431 11 r.PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH NAME/ADDR . . 002 00012 1 :tv5»;r ♦ • : I V •V • ”: % •• / i * ‘ • •. * V.: .• A • V • 38 08-117-23 31 0002 01396 BALDUR PARK RO TERRIS M SADLER TERRIA H SADLER 1396 BALDUR PARK RO WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 31 0005 01376 BALDUR PARK RD WENDY L WEIHE WENDY WEIHE STORLIE 1376 BALDUR PARK RO WAYZATA Wr4 55391 39 08-117-23 34 0018 01404 BALDUR PARK RD CHARLES AFFIAS CHARLES AFFIAS 2634 JERSEY AVE S ST LOUIS PARK MN 55426 38 08-117-23 34 0032 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING SERVICES ESTATE OF EDWARD SPINDLER C/0 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY 7900 XERXES AVE S SUITE 1500 BLOOMINGTON W 55431 ifeiiiikiattiriiaiaMiAiiik REPORT NO. P1435401 PAGE 6 58 08-117-25 51 0005 • 01592 BALDUR PARK RD R H BERRY S 8 S BERRY ROGER H A BECKY S BERRY 1592 BALDUR PARK RD HAYZATA HN 55591 38 08-117-25 59 0016 01912 BALDUR PARK RO C C HAGFORS S K E HAGFORS CURTIS C HAGFORS 1912 BALDUR PARK RD HAYZATA MN 55591 58 08-117-25 59 0050 00078 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING SERVICES ESTATE OF EDWARD SPINDLER C/0 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY 7900 XERXES AVE S SUITE 1500 BLOOMINGTON MN 55951 58 08-117-25 59 0055 00058 AuwRESS UNASSIGNED HAROLD R KITCHEN HAROLD KITCHEN BOX 918 NISSHA MN 56968 •V i • I f I- » •% AiMik JJ 9 * . t -f ‘ . .. < 1 I '<1 ■:cl - % Adjacent Property owners■'Acknowledgerient Fort. I (we) r . * _ a- ^ I[print nante(s)j •• e. [prinr address] , r vHo n»-nccsed i.T.Drovement or proposed use or t.*e have reviewed the plans ^ ‘ ' ^Iso referred to as Land Use property located at / ^------------------- Application No. I (we) understand that in ^ property or use (are) not aslced c\ty Council'that I (we) am (are) aware of but merely to confirm ^ tL prooosed neighbor's project or use the improvement plans and that tne pr . r6cjui.res Council approval i / Property Owner Date Date Property Owner ^^^^*^******************************** I (we)&o'^rr "y v/ [print name(s) j / / >/rv^ of -----------—^ ! [print address I £L£^ +-h*n nrooosed imorovement or proposed use of the have reviewed the plans for th p . * also referred to as Land Use property located at --------------------------------------- Application No I (we) understand tl,at in tlJ^o^Vor'use (are) not as)ced to Counci i'that I (we) am (are) aware of but merely to confirm oroDOsed neighbor's project or use the improvement plans and that tne propo requires Council approval. Date property Owner /7 /7T^ Property'Owner Date If you )>ave ^y “rut'co^tnts""to "t)Te" Bu”rdln.1 Son\’n^“offi°” a\"^easVlO da^ys prior to t).e sci,eduled meeting date. •Mt ^ £l) f . i. T- ' A —.--y.1 t • o J 5 ■|» •I I ~Mfl I ■ I- ^ 1 d nr A^JI 5' '■i •’■'.V,5 ,* ^ \I^ • ^ p .-■0 M* .»• U< Granting A Variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 34.552 - Pile 770 Whereas, Ronald Gehring is the owner (hereafter "owner"/ of the property located at 1396 Baldur Park Road within the City of Orono (hereafter "City") and legally descrioed as Lot 16, Block 1, Baldur Park (hereafter "property”); and t ; " T. Whereas, the owner has applied to the City for variances to nunlclpal zoning code section 34.552 to permit construction of a principal residence on a property that consists of 12,870 square feet Instead of the required 21,780 square feet and has 50 feet of lot width instead of the required 100 feet. Minnesota: Now, Therefore Be It Resolved by the City Council of Orono, Pindlngs 1. This application was reviewed as zoning file no. 77R. 2. The property Is located In the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshore Residential zoning district. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on August 15, 1983, and recommended approval of the variances as proposed based upon the following findings: a) There Is no additional land available to combine with the property. b) The City has approved three similar lot area and lot width applications for the property. c) The principal structure will be constructed per the required setbacks of the LR-IC zoning district. d) Sewer is available to the property. • ) A residence harj existed on the property at one time 4. The City Council has considered this application Including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the owner and other Interested persons, and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. I \ t* • • t. • * > ♦f- i V ‘f2 ‘- •’^ • r • A: .^'1.,v: r r?✓» 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district: that granting the variances would not adversely effect traffic conditions^ lights air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the owner, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; Is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the owner; and would be .in keeping with the spirit and Intent of the zoning code and 'Comprehensive plan of the City. . '-i CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, uhe Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Section 34.552 to permit construction of a principal residence on a property that consists of 12,87S square feet instead of the required 21,780 and has 50 feet of lot width Instead of the required 100 feet subject to the following conditions: 1. All Improvements on the site (this includes decks, patios, driveways, hard surfaced walkways, etc.) shall be limited to 2,280 square feet of hardcover. 2. No structure (includes decks and patios) may not be located closer than 75 feet from the lakeshore and the principal structure must meet the average lakeshore setback of houses on adjacent lots. 3. Appl leant to qul t c';aim deed portion of Baldur Park Road that intersects the property, area to be deeded must include an additional 3 feet for maintenance. 4. No other variances are granted or will be permitted in the future for this structure or for the property. 5. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the owner, but are permissive only r id must be exercised by appl i cation for a building permitwlthinone year of the date o f Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (September 12, 1984). 6. Violation of or nor.compl lance with any of the terms and conilitiona of this variance ahall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any author ity granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. > w ‘T ,Vi- H . •ters • , r- .- IK, ^ ♦ i>?4 }t>.. 7. The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 12th day of September, 1983. ATTESTS CITY OP ORONO City ClerK Mayor Property Owner(s) Property Owner(s) Property Owner(s) y /Jf6 fL£.MHIBIT . •..“wjr i» I I* * I, I i«r •*. r** * ^ ii •|^» ••• I. C'tiPt.v* t'*r.t<^fOt9 I ii-.j*. :.i r-r*.: ;. f . rpiT' f* *’f'T*. "I vu'. ■'f. c * •'* .• ■.<• %••* :: .r.Nt «’ -f* i*. I 'Ir. L, ’’ r .-•r... *.: •• lt»*r *.!*•! .* • 1 L *j.. : ! i L ir :.n, , »u. . f u* ;> ;.hov o».K r *-• • r- •’:• f: cix .f 0.ttW'j«r»ir6rftr : !r. • k-.,-. </: ••/'«'. ["fef ' *• r*’•'•■•“>••* t* I . • • .7. t■ . V r, * : li**.-* ' • •. . * • [i©[iO'^B NOV - 9198/ CITY OF ORONO 7^004 V..' i * MC /7<P/ l/Ai- fi&ePozicL. RON GEHRING newHOUse ennnr ns 3?15 CHARUS LN. MOUND. MN. 55364 • * ;; «u « a V : t i. r ♦I I f ' !■ L- f- .• >v I V •f' -i .4 /V > 4 Igity Control No. ro*t OflJc* Bot 6<*CrytUl 8*y. MinnttoU SM23* Municipal Omc»* T»l»rhon* 473 7.1f<7 A ^ -it. K Ronald Gehring 3215 Charles Lane Mound. MN 55364 Variance Conditional Ur.c Perniit Subdiviclon, Preliminary I ji I s- Date of Notice 8-22-83 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Meeting B-lS-83- - - - - - I'i. Votes:For Acainst 5iS!SS?- ■ - .. T 3 & : -S’' • ^iS:VCi>DD^u.i,.i-ai'«ubmltt«<l , '■ '■■' S ' I'V < ' f ( ;T rji ' .'Approval 1*2!, Subject‘to conditions noted irvjr*VADDrova it ^-Additional information required before Council meeting -<•_ • _ _ __ _ _‘Oeniai'tF'For reason's noted >c‘v.«>.’^abled:j^F«nding receipt of additional infom.ation from applicant O^M'V^T;{jabledl^Pending review by others, cr further Planning Comnission 'study No action required NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1) Improvements on the site (includes decks, pat^ drainage, cement walkways, etc) shall bo limited to 2,2 80 sf of hardcover;—2) ho structure (includes decks and patios) may not bo located closer than 75 from thi lakeshore in addition, the principal structure must meet the au^eraqo lakeshore_ setback of houses on abutting lots. Staff will designate required setback at time of building permit is applied for.3) The side yard setback of 10* must be maintained; 4) The Street setback for the principal structure is 30*. Special consideration should be given in location of the drive and garage in limi-ing _ UAAeddlAdPy hmdeover. a) Applicant must quit ciaim deed fhat portion Applicant's next schedul'd meeting is confirmed as: Planning Commission_ _ _ _ _ _ Cour.ci 1 _ _ _ September 12. Applicant’s next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ meeting is ; or - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - for the _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ meeting. In all cases, the application must be continued with Oie submittal of requested information within __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -- - - - - - - --- - - - or the City will consider the application as formally wttlidrawn. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Administrator, If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Cermission Minutes they ere available from the Huilding and Zoning Secretary upon review and approval by the Planning Ccm.mis9ion* P^ITY of ORONO ' Building Permit AND APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY r.m’ PERMIT N9 .*51781 DATE ISSUED ,/A EXPIRES 20NINQ DISTRICT FIRE VAAOATE, • _ OONO. use DATE WIOW ‘^I^IOEPTM f.V “ ‘_____________ ______ assMBigjgm LAKC '•i*’ NEW EXISTING ACENCY-APPROV. DATE ■22«*u» COUNTY STATE PR. EASEMENT Pftg.K> '3 I r?r?o?.-.LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PROP. ID. .“I --------- .at 16. BLOCK _J_________SUBDIVISION_______ 3WNER IN.m,» «Addrt.i» I M, SAbLprlg (a J. — ihfU. ARCHITECT/ENGINEER - Must Cirtify Multl*Fimily, Commtrci*l & Induttri*! Comtnictioo Plwi :ert .no . A f (Firm)• . lAddmur^V-^.., - V ’ ' *'T\ ■* (Phont)k:\- BUILDER ■ ’IFirm) ^ ‘ •(Phont) TYPE OF WORK;'Addition ' > ‘Rtmod«l Rtnovatt f^es \ DerJ,5; I : V CONST. TYPiV 1,JP RESIDENTIAL DWELL. UNITS / STALLS BLOG. SIZE L 2-Ml.2-*V STORIES a 1 BORMS/^LR SEPTIC APP. OATE NONRBSID. STORIES DOCK PROPOSED USI COUNCIL APP DATE EST\ CONST. VALUATION 4 ^o,am PERMIT FEES BLDG. PERMIT SVE STATE FEE PLAN REVIEW .'S!S>tr no ai PARK FEE H20. SAC CHARGE If 7. TOTAL DUE WJu^ i •■ ■ V • W ••• ^ V*' • » t:.- » pfr « ■ % REMARKS: •* * . . U: IMPiCTION REQUIRED -------^ POOTfNObafOPfpour ±.BBAMINO fOnni-M .MMULATKlN .WALUOARO Bolor* Tipln# T.^iNALfeatafo eacupMwv tVORR BIYONO or WrrHOUT A Ml* ouMBO mancTiON will bi sub > jmttopbnaltv . WPienOW HOUM 4T3.73BT CALLB* 19A.M. INBF. I'AAM. CALL t. 4 PAL INIP. NIXT OAV WORK REQUIRING SEPARATE ^MITS PLUMBINO----yR .r— MCCHANtOL WELL SEPTIC lEWER WATER ORAOINOBPILLINO electrical from Sttta • • • \\ •>V. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ^ THI UNDIRBIONIO HEBEBY BEQUESTS FEBMISSION TO MAKE I THE BEAL IMPBOVtMENTS IFBCIFISO. AND OECLABE8 UNOEB FENALTY OF LAW ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ANO ACCEFT* ^ ANCS OF ALL INF0BMAT10N. CONDITIONS ANO BBOUIBE* MENT8 BEFBB8ENTE0 ON THIS DOCUMENT. THE UNOEB-’ •lONSO FUBTHEB AQBEESTO 00 ALL WOBKS IN 8TBICT COM. FLIANCB WITH ALL CITY OF OBONO OBDINANCBS ANO STATE OF MINNESOTA BUILOINO COOS BBQUIBEMENTS. 1^- ' *■ Wy. ef- f i Sl|MliitvoA4 COBY: WNITt>FlU OBtSN-FINANCe CAMAIIY.INaFfeTOB OOLO-BICItPT AflMcad o.»///3a^ || City of Orono 1 i^ud “s Vi J^j Y' /(^ /6Vi/;j'C' /?* '^•!jtViLe£i /U-'J /'". /o' / . :?./:c:n\ /y\ L /'^’ ^nh 7^-ORONO HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET tv fc ^ r* i ' V.' ••>*’•. j -'vX*c;. ._ . ,, ,|. Kii...; ^;,;^ . ■ • . . • -I ’ iV. ■ ^ *-' .. • ;*-,v>\ - >-. ; • ' V. :•: i<..-»-^iV/A . - <• • • .*• »-. . i‘j ^ • . * •> • • • *” 'A * ^ * , V f ***..»»•/’ • » • ■ * • « \ • * i « LAKESHORE SETBACK ZONE A. Existing . lot area in zone B. Existing hardcover in zone C. Existing hardcover percentage ((BtA) X ioo] D. Proposed hardcover in zone E. Proposed hardcover percentage ((DfA) X 100) F. Allowed hardcover petcentage 0-75’/? r sf • sf %sf ‘ 4 * . /Cfc t • * 0 75-250*sf ')!0A 'Ve.nt • ?0 %25 Vo 250-500*sf * "u-T si %Sf J 30 f^/ / ^ 500-1000*sf ' sf %sf • »■% ■Vr';. %'35 • ff* • «< V »?•; ,i*« •# ‘‘ , V-* v\ **' .'r‘ •:• ‘ ‘ r• /•^• \- I * -*»• Z'0 ’ \ ! ' :< • -i i « t * C •» Directions:.-j.v^i;--' •, k . •• V* *• ■ • . r ■..•V .; *\. ■'; l*- t «•'■»■• ■ * V* U■> f . • V*» •'. * • *. r-'vr-K « • » ? ’ *,•-' ■ A. ■•.■' i. I •iP V?. : i'V. ' ' i';« ^. '■ A. Existing Lot Area in Zone - includes ^the total square footage of dry buildable land r.'^ . \ within the specified zone, i *. * B. Existing Hardcover in Zone - ihclude's^the square footage of existing roofs, decks, sidewalks# ^ - driveways (gravel or pavadr/and 6thari:rain-lmparviouB surfaces within the specified tone. C. Existing Hardcover Percentage -^divide^the number in B by the number in A and multiply by 100. D. Proposed Hardcover in Zone - includes.the existing hardcover plus all proposed additional • hardcover.. - -- •; • •■ . Proposed Hardcover Percentages ^divide*,the number in D by the number in A and'multiply by 100 ■ . Allowed Hardcover Percentages -^3;f^jy»a,.percentages in column E for any setback zone exceed '. ^v 'CTV Er • .iM- > • /-vv.*^ * the allowed percentages in^^colun^^^^yodjhhould contact the Zoning Department at 473-73S7 ties ofAp^aihin^a;variance. G( . *v ^ 4 to discuss the possibilities Generally, if a'concurrent’removal iVv of existing hardcover matchosrtl^g[ditionai hardcover proposed, resulting in’no nerincrea'se of hardcover in a specifiedf’zoneiTlSI^Vaiciance may not be necessary, r. -, '*1 I •*• •.'V-'P (>V J -A •: ;■• i I; .^T-' f • • o ^ /'i.• .*v --w - *r'.O C*r ^ ^ % & » t CITYof OROXO Building Permit AND APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY PERMIT NO.5731 DATE ISSUED /S? PO BOX 66. CRYSTAL BAY. MN 55323 473-7357 srs..,g£ 4 j., ■ ipg ■ r,T //V RinrK_____L__________SUBDIVISION ^TllCLU.— ZON^I^ISTR^T RE DEPARTMENT wni )P»I(POsroPfiCE VAR COND USE DATE WIDTH ^ y fin-hp' depth PROPOSED SETBACKS , ‘ ■• FRONT > -R SIDE .. / f ,5> f e»c<4e/i q ^ " tU si LSIOE ■ •REAR • V\ LAKE O / wetlands ACCESS agencya a PPPS voate CITY COUNTY STATE PRIVATE EASEMENT lAcidfPSSi (Pfionei /V. ____^Lf^IZk^. ■iTECt' en GINEEI^-MUSI Ci’Miiy Mu'li F.im^iy Commercial S Industrial Constniciion Plans iFirmi (Artdressi (Phonei APCMITEC iFirmi A BUILDER QiUi^cr - WORK A(^T o^ / r-C> (AdJressi (Phone) TYPE OF WORK Remodel ^ (iA Renovate CONST TYPE BUUDINGSI7F OCCUPANCY Estimated Construction valuation 4, ^roo ■ DWELL UNITS STORIES 8 17 3 GAR stalls number op bedrooms ATT DLT SEPTIC APP DATE PROPOSED USE COUNCIL APP DATE REMARKS Dh'n'i:t- <.,h.rc __12 ivmo L>a I 6t)Pi^ Wr/W BLDG. PERMIT STATE FEE PLAN REVIEW SAC CHAHUE SEWER UNIT PARK FEE penalty other permit pees 3 aO __ ^3 .. ioi«L DUtJ^(P 7 1 LV /.gl. inspection required V ^ , roOT'NO h#»o#p oou» 4mT. .... rPAMiNO fOugh *n ^............INSUIATION A............WAiLPOAPO taoi'x) ...........FINAL hPiO'# occupancy U.............SITE INSPECTION vVORK BEYOND OR WITHOUT A RE OUIRED inspection WILL BE SUB ircT TO penalty NSPECTIONS must be called in 1 hours IN advance WORK REQUIRING SEPARATl PERMITS plumbing MICMAN iCAL WELL SEPTIC SEWER WATER GRADING & MLUNG riPC □□□□□□□□ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THE uNOTRs-UNED Mrnrnv gfijursTS permission to make THE rial impmovi minis sprcinin and declares UNDER PfNAlTy or LAW AC»< NOWl f OGEMENT AND ACCEPT­ ANCE OI all iNfORMATiON CONDITIONS AND REQUIRE­ MENTS REPRESENTED ON TH'S DOCUMENT TmE UNDER- SIGNED ruRTMER AGREES TO DO ALL WORK IN STRICT COM* pliancc with all city or orono ordinances and state Of MiNNf SOTA OUU DING COD* "'COiPREMf NTS S-gnAlu*** •PV WMilt •■lU CANARY inspector PINK ASSESSOR A C* **« *«i/'«4**> GRf I N riNANCE gold Rf CC«PT A'lnmvvrl D »i»* f*. ?v » r** r. I • , i To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator 9 Front:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: October 15, 1991 #1690 William Pogue, 1991 Fagerness Point Road Appeal of Staff Interpretation - Public Hearing List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Letter of Request & Sketch Exhibit B - Letter to Applicant from Inspector 9/6/91 Exhibit C - Definitions - "Hardcover", "Structure" Exhibit D - Section 10.06, Board of Appeals Exhibit E - Section 10.22 Lakeshore Setbacks/Hardcover Regulations Exhibit P - Section 10.55, Subdivisicn 8, Development Restricted Within 75' of Shoreline Exhibit G - Resolution #2424 Exhibit H - Documentation of 1988 Variance Revision Exhibit I - Building Inspector's 1991 Sketch, Hardcover Added Since 1988 ^ fftoTOS Pertinent Code Sections 1. Section 10.02 Definitions of Hardcover, structure, accessory use or structure. 2. Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 & 2; No hardcover or temporary or permanent structures allowed within 75' of the shoreline. 3. Section 10.55, Subdivision 8; Prohibits any hardcover or temporary or permanent structure within 75' of the shoreline . Appeal Synopsis During an inspection of the neighboring property, the building inspectors observed a skate board raunp structure located on applicants property in the 0-75' setback zone. Given the history of hardcover activity on applicants property, inspectors determined that this ramp is hardcover, is in the 0-75' lakeshore setback, was built without a permit, and appears to be too near the side lot line. A letter noting these points was sent to the applicant. Applicants position is as follows: 1. Skateboard ramp should not be considered a permanent structure. 2. Skateboard ramp should not be considered hardcover because it is mobile. 3. As a mobile, non-permanent "toy", the ramp should not be subject to zoning requirements. Zoning File #1690 October 15/ 1991 Page 2 of 3 Discussion Both Sections 10.22/ Subdivision 2, and 10.55/ Subdivision 8/ do not allow "hardcover/ temporary or permanent structures" within 75* of the shoreline. The definition of hardcover includes any structure, blacktop, or other material which Interferes to any degree with the direct absorption of rainfall into the ground. It is staff's opinion that any "mobility" attributed to this structure is inconsequential, in that during any period of time it is located in tha 0-75* zone it is functioning as hardcover, and it has the same mobility as a garden shed or similar accessory structure. A mxtigating circumstance is that this property was the subject of an extensive hardcover review as recently as 1980, at which time the previous owners were required to remove a small storage shed in the 0-75* zone in exchange for attaching a third garage stall at the north end of the house. Hardcover was strictly limited per attached Resolution #2424. Since that construction in 1988, the property has changed hands and the recent site inspection indicates significant areas of new rock and fabric on the property as well as areas covered with brick pavers, all within the 0-75* zone. The building inspector's sketch indicates approved hardcover areas per Rresolutlon #2424, and those areas which have been added. Issues To Be Resolved 1. Does the skate board ramp constitute a "temporary or permanent structure" in the context of Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and 10.55, Subdivision 8? 2. Regardless of its structural status, does the skate board reimp constitute hardcover? 3. If the ramp is a "temporary or permanent structure" is it subject to the pertinent zoning ordinances regarding setbacks, hardcover, etc.? If the answer to any of these questions is in the affirmative, then the applicant should be advised to remove the ramp. His other option would be to apply for a variance to hardcover and lakeshore setback for accessory structure. If the answer is no to each question, does Planning Commission wish to consider whether there should be zoning standards for skateboard ramps? I j i to* -1 k Zoning File #1690 October 15, 1991 Page 3 of 3 It might be helpful to give applicant some idea of whether a variance application if required, would meet with success. If Planning Commission feels there is a location on the property that would allow for this use, please indicate that to the applicant. Finally, note that should the applicant disagree with Planning Commissions final determination on this appeal, applicant has the option of further appeal to the City Council. fC s • V s i c {a rvUMffl* •A /-r Of u V \ u!li ’ I JU C.r; ':• C’C’ ' sLiM Li September 17, 1991 :SEP 2 c 19Si Mr. Bruce Vang City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE: 1991 Eagerness Point Road Dear Mr. Vang: Cljy QF 0R0^>0 FlhWJE OFFICE 1 yef^oA/yflM lWw>Vi.\/VVVW .01 CEH 100.00 CHECK Pu 100.00 HLCEIFT-THAHK YOU H224290 cool ROl TIJ:! nC- /• ■/» /C i.Vf ! Your letter of September 6, 1991 indicates that it is your opinion that the skateboard ramp located on my property is a permanent structure and in violation of a number of building and zoning ordinances. As we discussed, I do not agree with your position and am hereby making a formal appeal. Attached is a check for $100 to cover the cost of the appeal. The skateboard ramp is not a permanent structure. It is designed after the ramps used by professional skateboarders which are moved from town to town for events and exhibitions. The ramp is composed of three sections which are joined together by screws. It can be disassembled in approximately 30 minutes for relocation. The three sections combined result in a ramp that is 30 feet by 12 feet. It is 6 inches from the ground in the middle and 7 feet high on the ends. The ramp is currently resting on blocks at the northwest corner of the property, about 10 feet from the property line and 30 feet from the water; however, since this is a portable structure, I may elect to move it from time to time to other locations. I am planning on adding wheels which will make it easier to relocate. I would certainly be happy to discuss this further but would be very surprised if portable, movable toys fall within the building and zoning ordinances. Sincerely, Rill PoaueMBill Pogue' 1991 Eagerness Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 o « t " SSf./r^ s 24.7^70 i • = SO/0 S If.r/. s 2/, y/ 5V t ■'V <•' horoby certify that 1 '. a • MJC* .J li i ( (; I f i- f ’ I'M‘^entdIion of a !>ijrv^y (;; I i I Mnil m -vV O O >i mca .v/v^'^r; ' * ▼<^ ' * * "V CITYof ORONO Municipal Offices Post Office Box 66 CnstaJ Bav, Minnesota 55313-0066 September 6, 1991 William Pogue 1991 Eagerness Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 RE: Structure without Permit Dear Mr. Pogue: r-We recently noticed a structure in your yard which was built without a permit. It appears to be a bike or skateboard ramp. The following problems arise: 1. 3. 4. Structure built without a permit. May be in O' - 75' lake setback. May be too close to property line. Almost certainly excess hardcover. r L- Please remove the structure by September 16, 1991 or apply building permit. Variances would be required, and approval is doubtful since your lot is already quite thoroughly developed. cc:Jeanne Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Michael Gdffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Lyle Oman, Building Inspector BV/lsv TELEPHONE - 473-7357 * FAX-473-0510 -------- . • ^ *»^i t. 0 « . « •■-. I '■- • • . . • *•>% .. •, if » . • m *- • / .• e • • • . .• r S 10.02 '.L'.rs SBC 10.02. definitions . A s used in this Zoning Chapter the following words*and phrases shall mean: • T • • 1 -Accessory Use or Structure" - A use or structure subordinate* to and serving the principal use or structure on the same lot and customarily incidental thereto. b.* ^ * •* ** • ■ ;* ' V t^.v ' :t-J;; ^', v ’O'- ' - .•'-■•.;•..••■; .. -,-v .. •! »••• V 5. . •r.* 29 "Hard Cover- - Anv structure, blacktop or other material which interferes to any degree with the direct absorption of rainfall into the ground. Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 69. -Structure" - Anything constructed or erected, the use of which requires a location on, below or above the ground, or attached to something having a location on the ground. Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 :. V. • m . -.vV :• ’■* • •r .; v. •. / ^ V .iV is.".**** .M ^ m \ • ••• m • W *■ »'•- , * ••• * # - I i%; • «• ■»' .*• '^V ' V . .■ ^ 'vJ f * .* ‘ r> ** “.« •*. .. • : f -a"- '' ■ • " * • ” * • » .. • •• I ■ *• II n I fiiiaAiii fciji iiaAtiiiiaa n—-----r- f . i iV € . § 10.06 SEC. 10.06. ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT be aa^inistfrta ^a'na sliall be appointed by the Council. 2 Duties and Authority. The Zoning Administrator shall enforce'the Zoning Chapter also U^ue that all building permits comply with the Zoning Chapte-, ( ) SrHi>i-ana“c^ur?/nt- iSI^?^V"a^ian=es?‘ appei^f an°a' afpUca\^^^ns^"or;' (sf file and forward all applications for appeals, amendments, variances special uses or other matters to the designated official (6) institute in the name of the City any appropriate ^luonV o ‘r®’pto«edin\l against a violator as "pY'nnTng (7) serve as an ex officio non-voting member of the Planning Commission. Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 Subd. 3. Appeals. A Board of Apoeals and Adjustments. The Planning Commission is constituted as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. The decisions of the Board are advisory to the Council. 3. Powers of the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. The Board shall have the following powers: 1. zoning; Appeals and Adjustmencs. Appeals ».« ♦•ho Rn^ird of ADoeals and Adjustments may be taken by any affected person upon^compliance with any of the conditions ij^posed hv the ZonTnq Chapter. The Board of Appeals and Adgostments has the following powers with respect to the Zoning Chapter. (a) To hear and decide appeals where it is alleged that there is an error in any order, tequiremen , deoisionror determination made by an administrative officer in the enforcement of the Zoning Chapter. (b) To hear requests for variances from th. literal provisions of the Zoning Chapter in instances where fiVcum s%^'n%%r‘a ntr^ e" %tL“fnd " L°mln^\Va\Vd°that-stch-a4 and intent of the Zoning Chapter. Undue na.dsnip ORONO CC 260 (4-1-34) 1 i , —,.lw .....e-. ULsrjrji£‘. . -an^-iaa. b U: § 10.21 Subd. 5. Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Requirements A. H«“ight. No structure or building shall exceed 2-1/2 stories or thirty feet in height except as provided in Section 10.75. be observed: B. Lots. The following minnnum requirements shall Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard Side Yard Adjacent to Street Rear Yard 1/2 acre 100 feet 30 feet 10 feet 15 feet 30 feet Family Lakeshore Residential District the following regulations shall apply: Subd. 1. Lakeshore Set Back Regulations. The setback from the shoreline for lakeshore lots: A. Shall be 75 feet for all structures except permit from the City. B. No principal or accessory structure shall be located within 75 feet of the lakeshore nor closer t° t"® lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing Slli^rita^n“di^^fInd°Spfcrfrcftibn^s? /xcirt tha°/this"refn^t^ apply to structure allowed in subsection A above. Subd. 2. Lakeshore Hardcover and Land Alteration Regulations. Within 75 feet of shoreline there shall be no excavating, filling, hardcover, temporary or permanent struc ures ro=?5^0 ¥eiro ”f“?re shtre \\“n:%=be°.ter>\r2^, ssiirbe-nofeet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 35% hardcover. ORONO CC 283 (4-1-94) I laiiii § 10.55 I % Subd 6. Zoning Use Districts. The Zoning Use Districts as designated’on the Official Zoning Map shall remain unchanged with the adoption of this Section. The provisions of this :>ection, including the designation of Flood Plain and Wetlands Conservation i.Ajie shall be in addition to all other provisions of this Chapter. Whenever conflicts occur between other provisions of this Chapter and provisions of this Section, the most restrictive provision shall prevail. Subd. 7. Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. The Requlatory Flood Protection Elevation shall be an elevation no lower than one foot above the elevation of the regional flood any increases in flood elevation caused by encroachments on the flood plain. A The reaulatory flood protection elevation within the Floodway and Flood F'ringe Districts shall be established by adding 1.0 foot to the Base Flood Water Surface elevations within Floodway listed in the Floodway Data Table Insurance Study. Regulatory flood protection elevations between cross-sections shall be interpolated. B. The regulatory flood protection elevation for Lake Minnetonka shall be 932.5 MSL. C The regulatory flood protection elevation within forth herein. Subd. 8. Development Restricted; Prohibition. Except as hereinafter specifically permitted, no filling, grading, dreaging, excavation^Tardcover, t or Permanent structures obstructions, septic systems, well or other construction shall b allowed within the Flood ^lain and Wetlands Conservation Area; nor on anv lands within 26 feet thereof; nor on any land within 75 feet of the ordinary highwater elevatioh of any lake shoceline, nor on Und abutting/adjlining or affecting saW area if upon those adjacent areas is incompatible with the policies expressed in this Section and the preservation of those conservation areas in their natural state. have a low^ fltid^damagrpotll/iari^d‘do^'n^ obstruct flood ®flows^ r/trnt“^?haf%\\?%r/^^o^r^prl^^rte^d^%rany%t^^^^^^^ provision and provided all permits or authorizations are received as mav be required by other City Code provisions or regulation of other ^governr^ental agencies having jurisdiction, including withou limitation the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the iinnehaircreek watershe oLtrict, and the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. In addition, no use shall adversely affect ORONO CC 365 (4-1-34) V* **r— , . \ ^ ,-i* V ' . 'f» . V • fc a’*t kL* ... . r ; . •' *.•••.■•’ * **t" * * •-;* '* :' • ■ **’*Vr'^ V .• ' • • • »* » •.’»■ i'.-: ; •>/ / \ ^ - '^iT*;:4*'. t»S«i n ■ .:'.-.S'-V-■ “1.‘ •-’ ■> ■V-i:.-.’?^.- ?:.V City of OROIVO *'«* » .' :; * * V • ‘ .•..^.cijTYr/,.,.* OF- ' . ORONO k Al / ? ' ■ '• ‘■*'-v ..'• u> ' • ,*.'*v’ T * ' •* RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2424 V--. . • • • ■• . • ’. • t iV i’.' ; ( » ,;•;: A RBSOLOTZON GRAI1TZM6 ' v«.-•I*. } M A VARZAMCB TO , wicrPAt -iioraK CODS _ ^:^jJ ‘r6BCTI0» 10.22; 8OBOIVI8IOII8 1; 2^A»D 3 '^‘T^'C SBCTIOB 10.55/SOBDIVISIO* 8/AID t .^crjwtiiic a cohdztxohal osb pkwiit per 10.55r 80B0XVX8X0R 10(B) •- .* •■i FXLB 91255 •' **' »1 . * >Cr«vt'WBBREASf Orville Plsher (hereinafter "the applicant") is ths,;^^^/.bi owner of the property located at 1991 Pagerness Point Road within .the City of.Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: . Exhibit A Attached (hereinafter "property"), and WHBRBAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono to permit the construction of minor additions to the existing which will constitute additional structure and hardcover within the 0-75 lalceshore setback zone where such structure and the hardcover associate V. c * k* K ’ H with it are not normally allowed per Municipal Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 ft 2, and to permit the removal of existing trees in the 0-75* >.jr i zone and replacement with new trees, requiring the permission of the City Council cer Section 10.22, Subdivision 3; and to permit the regrading of the driveway and yard area in the 0-75* zone, requiring a Conditional Use Permit per Section 10.55, Subdivision 10 and requiring a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8. MON, TBBRBPORB, BB IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: PIHDIlIGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1255.1.% ^ ^ 2. The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The property is approximately 0.54 acre in area, virtually all of which is within the 0-75* lakeshore netback zone. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 19, 1988, and recommended on a 3-2 vote to approve the requested variances and Conditional Use Permits for the proposed additions, regrading and tree replacement based on the following findings: Page 1 of 6 t1 I City of OROIVO •• •*. X 'ORONO-i L-. . RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2424 _ .. • 4.* •. V*» * • A. The proposed additions cC 2 bay windows and a fireplace each extending no more than 2' past the existing walls of the house/ and the addition of an ope i entryway with plllars/ will not add to the perceived bulk of the house/ and will not appear as a significant further encroa':hmeninto the lakeshore yard areas. .•* I’ * . * D. The relocation of the garage doors and concurrent relocation of the driveway area will result in the improvement of the drainage pattern in the neighborhood by decreasing excess runoff to the driveway area on the neighboring property. E. The loss of an existing mature oak tree and a willow tree along the lakeshore as a result of this project is unfortunate/ however the replacement of those trees with other trees is certainly appropriate and necessary to preserve the character of the lakeshore and the neighborhood. 5. The City Engineer has reviewed the grading proposal for the revised driveway and recommend.^ approval/ finding that the proposed driveway coufiguratlon and drainage pattern are no worse than the existing driveway, will help to alleviate an existing drainage problem/ and is the most feasible method for run-off control on the property considering the relative elevations of the driveway and yard area 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply goncreily to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would noc adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but ia necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping Page 2 of 6 *r / B. With the removal of plastic underlayment from all of the . existing landscape and play areas, hardcover on the property can be reduced by approximately 1/3, which is a significant benefit.. C. The existing shed located within 15' of the shoreline is a • non-conforming structure, and due to the uniqueness of this property being entirely within the 0-7b' setback zone, it is appropriate to require that that shed be either moved to a • location at least 50' from the shoreline and meeting all required accessory structure setbacks, or be removed entirely and a structure of a similar area be allowed to be attached to the north end of the house. I i 1I : •."i. i-w-r.;-..........k;-V---Jr f-i-.‘^^*>--A'' :%■ ■-■'•,•.' .' ■' .•* , •R' m City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2424__________ ORONO' .'•• c.tf- with the spirit and Intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. r 7. The City Council findc that granting a conditional use permit to allow the proposed work within the 0-75* lakeshore setback zone will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire haxard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLOSIORS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 4 2 to permit the construction of minor additions to tha residence which constitute additional structure and hardcover within the 0- 75* lakeshore setback zone where such structure and the hardcover associated with it are not normally allowed, and grants permissic i for the removal of existing trees in the 0-75* zone and replacement with new trees, per Section 10.22, Subdivision 3, and grants a Conditional Use Permit per Section 10.55, Subdivision 10 and variances to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit the regrading of the driveway and yard area in the 0-75' zone, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall remove the area of existing blacktop driveway and shall construct the driveway and the additional sidewalks as shown on the approved site plan, attached as Exhibit B. 2. Applicant shall remrve the landscape rocks/plastic/timber area located adjacent to the existing driveway and this area shall revert to grass. 3. Applicant shall remove plastic from below all other decorative rockbeds on the property. 4. Applicant shall remove plastic from below the sandbox area where the trampoline is located. 5, Any of the areas from which plastic is to be removed may be underlain by porous geotechnical fabric if the applicant so desires. 6. Applicant shall remove the existing shed and attached roof structure from its current location and may either place that shed in Page 3 of 6 M •r M I! ♦ I j' i: ♦ ♦ • -■• *#‘ • ■V.' 1 City of ORONO v« • t RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _l«i_______-j; -. rt .^ »• *1^ $ ;• ^ • • 4 • '* • * -V ‘ ;-. r... .7 *.,.*r^ *■ "*1 * 'vV^'* ♦. V.*..-, yV. ' I. • r - N .* * ■ ^ . ^ . .. • toJ \ . • tAh l«aat 50* from the lake and 10‘ from both the S:rbrne 9r«teV'Lha„'”e current 2»8 a.f. .bed .tructur*. » case, a separate building permit will be required. v — .r . - -4* V Aoplicant shall plant replacement trees on the property per ther; I'andscape plan attached as Exhibit C- ■*. 4 8 The maximum hardc ver on the property is allowed as follows .(all* in the 0-75* zone): House and garage West deck and step New entryway New bay windows and fireplace New sidewalks New driveway Existing porch steps Shed (roved or attached) Total 2e308 s.f. 339 s.f. 132 s.f. 65 s.f. 392 s.f. 1,286 S.f. 60 S.f. 208 S.f. •. '. - j •, ■ t - . w e. f * ' '* .•<..* ) . ■ ' ■* V ^ •).« Ts ■ » I . ; s*’t , / • ’ i ^ ■ * •.« * o:» ... 17790 s.fT^ (4,790/23400 •• w . .• 20.5t). -ti.- - v:: ^ b'o .pp^foM" Vor"thtt'’ pr'op.'?“, "°.nd“'.“ny ^“47/^ V« «la\\nV h«dc'o»Vr'', no" n«°i:.rdcov.c Inct..... ' i!;. x‘"/iV".r"S sS'Si expire on that date (May 9, 1989). r. 11 Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 12. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and ^^a^’heiJs**" to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs. I • Page 4 oC 6 r r wgii^r ■.■fiP 4t~T-T^i'iMi I itoWiihlltoirtoiafito t r i r* • '- » •.,*,>■ • - ^ * • • ** /. A ^ e *'■i kr- ‘i L m •e e A « * * » • • _ U 'VI City of ORONO V # 4^ • . • •« ,1 •• >.*. OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO._ilil K*4 4-; . J •'''••, ■ • f '-J .1 * ■ •' .• »• . • ’ . F, #. • • i- • i*-* - . ••% I • /*» * w- •-< «* • • • V** and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of^his,,- jfggoXutlon in the chain o£ title of the property* Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 9th day of MayrllW^ MTallin, city iiera Pan'^ 5 of 6 L j 1 * L 1 / mi City of OROISO ttr n RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. __2424 ORONO: STATE OP MINNESOTA ) } 88. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this / / day of /y)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared E. fisher Sr> kno*m tc ne to be 198^ the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument# and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same his (their) free act and deed. .V. NOTARY PUBLIC '7-/5 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OP MINNESOTA ) )S8. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this /Jf'^ day of _ _ _ _ _, 1982, before me a Notary Public within and for said County# personally appeared ^ netPishes known to me to be the personTs) described In and who executed the foregoing Instrument# and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC *1 rssssi,, wr oSmim!*0-/S-9J MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 6 of 6 ’i « * # a .* • I •s. » k m I I ■ »;»• I « i I # f • • A, < t f . t . r * m - ^ ^•« • ■• •• ^ —I i -««. _ -ti— ''^^x'ik'iS ''Vi;'^/'5i« >> •;. ; .► . . », f f -' i. ^ M ♦.' 5*% »• »1 % :,' -^1 * •J Ii.* :-z.,;; 1' 5^ ^ :r“t.*l ; 4 , ®5#l %: ?■ f♦ • - * ^: • > •- ‘4f- < irfi iMMil • ■ , ;>-:.^l/v^;t ’:.w4' ' •• 4 . 1*ifV * • 1 I**' iJ v-4 ■*; Wi EXHIBIT A . RESOLUTION NO. 2424 V * • LEG;'X DESCRIPTION •m> t A ^V-< • > V- « » . M.r. — 4 *' •r I mm. ' ‘ ‘ / -i \v■ • ■/.-. v,?Vi?:rS .» -s /-• b-'.^‘.>= ion with the SouthNesterlj^ lini beginning; thence continuing^ innetonke; thence Noftherli «j| 1 m M ^ M ft A A ^ A ^ ^ AAA .A A ^ A ^ lot 26, FAGERNESS, except th,)t part thereof described as follows: Commencing fi/»cf>P?Il!^ *” Southerly line of Lot 2.FAGERNESS, extended Southeasterly which point is So feet from the most Southerly corner of said lot 2; thence angle right 65 degrees 4$ minutes a distance of 77.66 feet* *r**l2^J degrees in a straight line o/«ld point oP intersectionnn «f»J *• point is Ilie actual point of beginnin cisdAlH-i: “SlH c?oT5J rle'rU'Sj l"^u,‘^^^s?L:'3rr^.'•,fL3!3rs"^^= :!o" s^.TjKid “3i»v/^ Westerly 2S feet, more or less. ?o the ,ilSf of f°o3lS5l„S “'"* •>«8‘""l"9; thei mmw .-A-t i* MmmM rlWr. V^ - ------- All within the plat of Fagernoss, Hennepin County, Minnesota*; ■" ► V mm' m fM-:S:>^^’•::^V ;.Jv:.:r v- ■: / -v.'V j*'* •/ ■ ••J^. •*r * */• ____------------------------------------------------------- , liM: i i1 • ^‘;’v*'*, r'- -•'■*:' - *. <; -:• ' ■ Sr^ViV.V-:#-.- ■• jS. as§.m ED 4 i^i> I V« : 0 1 xirr=L~ f \ // ipir .-.■J * ►Jf •> C • .T ;■ T«Jrtasn£t ,^;. • S . it -r • V 'f- • ■^■'' - ^ y '' ' ^ >• C? >*'^*- -‘Jii t ■4-- v ‘ • V- • V * '^•^1 V ': .PS^^ivT-SVi 4 • * ‘ t. ^ \M ?it^- V - ")3*4 , ■%' 1».^,V-S r *- I' • I•— • •** EXHIBIT B RESOLUTIOH HO. 2424 FITE/DF.IVEKAY GRADING PLAN i% •JZ-»/ifjL.% f -n>JC mm-A-'-'r-»'.- '•■ rVitijir riji : • ..rf .L ;:•.;: ',>. . _»* V EXHIBIT C RESOLUTION NO.2^24 rgf'^'-v-- .* :^ , ; l^scapk plan •> - •• •■• JT < • : •.-*'• i*' 1 - • > • >■ • V fc03«T5. * . * 1 ’•% f »;• * •.• . • . . ■;• • ,. ;V* Nr.1ic* . . *• ’ ^ >Ma BBWi r... :v:.lV: • 'p, ► V •» ' - ■• -v-; -.It* I tv'-^ •• *•4 • - • ... “ V' ■ ';!•,t<.- 1 <*.• l.v# .‘•r::o- .• ** r * . ■^- *■••.■-.. •• # • "■ - *>y •*■•■ •■;•■ i Hr’ 2i*»aLE>t» 5 J'ii i^Mh rli&i • ^ A*..* < ;>:>:•• •. ■miWM I *.v piwi HTf I IPiiX i t.V • 'i • ; . i ? . A.*- #.• i «.• V* ^■=TN^ ‘ — ^ ; • '• I- ' *P/P tlf.^A e.^/. -tf 7m : .*1 ' - ^ .* I »'• * •‘Hereby certify vi ^HiS is a .true and correct '^presentation of a survey of yr^'*:'■ \ r r '•; f tli^ fol!o\’inn •.V .-.I i I'Co |,ro|-crl> : that ■XK.-'■ •;^>.1XV-/;rr r-r ‘ - - / <r *. -r - rvnjtc MfVTi uvt.4, -I v#Hf ^li.Tt^t«^ ^txt, ^ ^tt«l % Acctwrr WA4.U- •*»•••• MUt^W, rAI» T liLA., 4/M9 fAUtiiMO. tA^rvifj tuA.ftnc.. .wcurt >a#/asa^c.«- /V^AY & , n 5fi> K.ftVI»tP AA*'* •«» * • ^ 6 a Ft?4«eK. RC»ioeMce Pl^KKENPOL BLALfiERS 4ik •• ft; ~rr.- ’ r /i.>siki:vrf ' .C, --------------* /♦V.' ♦ • t - * • I. - ' -C-^ . ^ V - / -2 ‘i < .- • . • .-.^ •■ * v*^;. ••. '\'tu i• • * • I *'v > .« . ’ * • . . N* -. •* • 1 • . • v^' ^• • • 4 . -T* -* ••;. • t-*• '. . r ? • r * •. •*< . •• .*• . f ' •’ “ • - '4* ' • • * % • , * •f* \ f** / • V* ,*» irp/ v ' *. • . ». * »W^ ‘ , - T ...‘ • •'"'' V' ■ ^.4*..^ * * ■ :**^^>, ■ I ■'• ••.. • *4■ '■* .• ''■, r.S.'' V V -‘-r : k‘ ? *•'■%• j tfHi Lint A' i it :orrect survey of ie following ixcept that part ; follows: Commencing lutherly line of Lot 2, Southeasterly which im the most Southerly ; thence angle right 5Ci?-Lfr' :^^ • V .H t r.-. 'S, .V* ■ Ricjfc. • ‘ -^ * :. • 4 :J ^l.90t:iiyc> /^^TH G " %A - Vf- W*- **»r *, ■•^ ^/ m: 8 v’;V:Ar ' ; ' • ^ .vv^Air-'1 ^ ill'-'■> a:-S;8 ^ f ym ^ ■♦ V.-. ■'■• ; :..-• 81^ '/ =i’^r.-: -v: asi .,;■:; ...As 'M-y MmM ■ " ':■ ■■ ■-I ^•.^ ^ f r^C^'^ffJC-^ tAJC -T ^/-A 1*^«E To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Moorse From Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning S Zoning Administrator Date:October 14, 1991 Subject:#1692 Bruce W. Engelsma, 990 Partenwood Rd. Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IB, Single family lakeshore residential, 1 acre, sewered Application - Request for lakeshore setback and 0-75' hardcover variance to construct additions to existing residence. List of Exhibits Exhib/.t A Exhibl' B Exhibit . Exhibit .0 Exhibit fc Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Site Plan Construction Plans Hardcover Calculations 1909 Air Photo (not to scale) Pertinent Code Sections - 1. 2. 3. Section 10.22, Subdivision 1: Requires 75' lakeshore setback for all structures. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2: 0% hardcover allowed in 0-75' lakeshore setback zone; 25% hardcover allowed in 75-250' lakeshore setback zone. Section 10.55, Subdivision 8: No hardcover or structure allowed within 75' of the shoreline. Pertinent Facts - 1. 2. Applicant proposes to construct two story family room/bedroom addition, remove and rebuild garage. 3. New addition setback to shoreline; footage of structure in 0-75' = additional non-structural hardcover. Hardcover: Existing Changes 0- 75' 9.9% (+136 s.f.) 75-250' 26.3% (-493 s.f.) 67'. Total new square 98 s.f., plus 38 s.f. Proposed 10.6% 25.0% Allowed 0% 25% J Zoning File #1692 October 14, 1991 Page 2 Applicant's Stated Hardships/Dnusal Property Conditions 1. 2. Due to contour of the lake, a corner of proposed addition falls within 0-75' setback area. Existing living area of house falls within 0-75' making it impractical to add on outside 0-75'. To tie into existing home and preserve architectural style requires minor enroachment of 0-75'. Site is long, steeply sloping lot requiring a large driveway surface to access house. We propose to reduce by rebuilding garage at higher elevation. Existing home built within 0- 75' zone. Issues to Consider 1. 2. • 4. Is the proposed 493 s.f. reduction in 75-250' hardcover a sufficient justification to allow a 136 s.f. hardcover increase in 0-75' zone? Does the pre-existing location of the house provide a reasonable hardship to justify a 98 s.f. portion of the addition to be located within the 0-75' zone? Could the additions be redesigned to eliminate any new structural encroachments in the 0-75' zone? Are there items of existing structure or hardcover in the 0- 75' zone that could be eliminated to result in no 0-75' hardcover increase? Discussion The existing house is perched on a terrace level about 15' above Maxwell Bay. The proposed garage revision is intended to make for a more functional garage access. The existing driveway is fairly steep near the house. Where the additions encroach the 0-75' zone, mature trees dot the slope in the 0-75' zone, such that during the summer leaf-on conditions, the 0-75' addition will be barely visible from the lake. As you stand at the site of these additions, the lake is perceived to be perhaps 150-200' distant due to extensive wetlands (see 1989 air photo). It is not known whether these wetlands will disappear as the current near-normal lake level conditions persist. Lot coverage by structures is about 5% and not an is.ue. The average setback line is far lakeward of the house due to a curved shoreline. Average setback is not an issue. 1 ■iir T Zoning File #1692 October 14, 1991 Page 3 RecoDBendation Options Planning Commission may wish to consider the following options for recommendation: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Approve as proposed. Conditionally approve, specify conditions. Table, request specific or general revisions (give applicant direction). Deny, specifying reasons. Other. 1 CITY OP OROSO - vaRiAMCS application Tnitial ADolication Fee Sl'3*00 ^ USO.Oo'per each additional variance) S* y* .•r Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 ,. , (L change from original application) *"°-the-Fact*Fees (Double aoplicatio fee) After PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 990 Partenwood Road ,-TTV nr nCf-\ir,ua f I ui wtwi f li/ JS^LgtTtescript^^^^ jjeqtlired survey* ______ —--------------- Phone ^v>nni«») 471-7730--------- applicant _ , __ Phone (work) 332-1241 ----Bruce W« Enqelsma ----- , „ j ritv; Orono Zip:_553.S^990 Partenwood__Road_____ ^ -f --------—- Q1 QEH 175.00 TL ----------------------------------- Flh'AiiCE OFFICE 1350200000 CHECK TL 175.00 Name Address: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) Phone (work) Address: City;Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT OSE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Ose of Property LR-lB Sinale Feunilv Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQOEST a. 1* 2-StOry ______ Describe revest ni^age to impiuve access Estimated Consi^ction Cost Hardcover _ variance ,dditiojl.to^3tir airi rdauild garage y ^pta wcbs required Lot Area Lot Width X Hardcover 0-75 Setback Variances (-------- Front Lakeshore setback Side Rear). Other ? J hardship Describe undue hardship or oracticai difficulty resulting from strict 2. •;,LS^lS;r'^F"^Sn;;^'^;^CC.;DXTioHr it>fe rg..i,-^.-nnn5r-in..5in«» 0:75' . Describe unusual prooerrv conditions oreventinq cpmoliance with Sor.iac^^ uixuo X is^ong, steepy sloping lot requiring large driveway surface Code Requirements ________ ______________;-----------------------------------------:- to access house,. We propose to reduce this by rebuilding garage at higher elevation. PTgQTTrim SUBMITTALS Existing home built within u-/b‘. 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll" for reproduction ). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8><"xll ). Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8V"xir*). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City sta" 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.,ff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that yoor variance application is not complete if the above ■I nfomation has not been included. APPLICANT * S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and corre<?t to tha-best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date ONNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verificationion o^ this request) DateOwner' s Signature , Applicant must have all submittals^into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant xs unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zonxng Office of this change prior to the meeting. - - RUN DATE 09/20/91 BATCH 001 PROP AODR OI#IER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AODR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR •ft HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST 36 08-117-23 12 0002 00970 TONKAHA RD J R OBERG A E A OBERG JAMES R A EMILY A OBERG 970 TONKAHA RD ORONO MN 55356 38 08-117-23 12 0006 00990 PARTENHOOD RD BRUCE A MARY ENGELSMA BRUCE A MARY ENGELSMA 990 PARTENHOOD RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 08-117-23 21 001^ 00955 TONKAHA RD JAM GILBERT JAMES H A MARY M GILBERT 955 TONKAHA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 • • • TOTAL BATCH 001 00009 , % *% . I ,1 # • •-i I,:;-. , , t • • 38 08-117-23 12 0003 00960 TOMCAHA RD DAVID J RIDLER ETAL DAVID J RIDLER 2925 GARFIELD AVE S MPLS MN 55908 38 08-117-23 21 0007 00930 PARTErA^O RD HALAND C A JO ELLE L HURR MALAND A JO ELLEN HURR 930 PARTE^4HOOO ROAD LOTK; lake MT4 55356 38 08-117-23 21 0015 00975 TONKAHA RD A A M KARAS ANTHONY J fARAS 975 TONKAHA RO LONG LAKE Hti 55356 REPORT NO. PAGE PI435401 1 38 08-117-23 12 0009 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED DAVID RIDLER ETAL DAVID J RIDLER 2925 GARFIELD AVE S MPLS MN 55908 38 08-117-23 21 0013 00935 TONKAHA RO HILLIAM J MCLELLAN ETAL NILLIAM J MCLELLAN 935 TONKAHA ROAD LOf|G LAKE MN 55356 38 08-117-23 21 0017 00960 PARTENHOOD RD GARY H A JEANNE M KRIMMEL GARY H A JEANNE M KRIMMEL 960 PARTENHOOD RD LOrJG LAKE MN 55356 • I I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUITY DEPAR1>1ENp OF PROPERT)^ T>)$/^TION> TO THE/^BEST OF MY KNO»<ILEOGE AND BELIEF. DAT W/ffA • • . % • ^ • '» ' • , ♦ f% wr—N . ^ V. 'r J I ^ ). paTstT n •_rtt ^!V p-i . 1 CM nr iCAtco' Vuffvf / row onuciw. (NOELSNA Cf M* 1. ’Mrx I. 'ARrMyoc^ Sicmii AiiiittKi.j nM4iJ’in couNir, hiincsoIA UfiAL OCSClIFTIOli: lAi I, Ptork !, ^arttnMOO'l Srconr* *;!*«• M»on • M» furvov **io lo#*4tlon of an oitftlng fiouso In rolat .nn *.1 '^o «bo»e doscribcd p^nparty. *t i<npf not pu^DO»‘l to show an/ o»*ter l•provef•rnts or §nrroamnroi.'ier l.lan oilttmg v1si:)|‘q harjcowo** I ! inrob/ rffflf/ lilt Ihll iMf¥0» •*.»» prrparni hjr nr or* iio»»rr n*- !♦"?<* siiocrviiion iiorf trval J a rtulf ri*gii»#rod Cl»»l Toginpcr ^nij ' anrt 5o^**o»or unOrr i* * |ji«% o? *hi» Mate of llinnoioia. • • •• ‘ • c'^rriJt A rnof.'»c?:c. “Jirk S. nmnhrrn *l*f. ilr. •Jo. '7^55 {nntnoert, land 5iir*t*ora, -ilatinr^a long lako. }||nnr«nra iiaie : 7»IO«'iiA —■«■»« Sfalo : I Incft ••w»'rpi n ; Iron 'Urkrr rnuoil hohio Cavr I Ino • *t»»0U0 «•«. •• •••*•• poarfrigs Shown rm ha«rii «ipnn an a«tit*«r(l datuMi. ffwaf ^ aioarfak*: f (tin . —aoh- • '• ' :■ • »• r- 0' mm w.’. I • »• • • ••« • -»’ • I. i-fTT. J, Tbi^. I F>s£rEi4fe?»c» 2.; ' .. ‘ • • • ^ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE' ONE75-250* 250 1000'I Existing)Hardcover in Zone A. ‘ House c. D riveway • i E. Patio / D eck # • ««••• • * M AREAS BY ■ . PLASTIC SHEETING 6. Other % »« « * • • X __r • 970 LENGTH WIDTH • -*■ . . • . X , • • • • • # • X • •• X • • ra< • • • • • X i • . t• . • i^.O X G.\^• “ 37 Y • X • X • < 14- • 4.0 X <r,z. « * •• • • . 25* •-4 0>X S' m • • .-.3"^ ' . t • , X t.4-^ •/7S.Z ,. ... G. 1 • X /J • •• • • y%j 3..^.• m X X S;? • * • S3 ■• /%9 •* i X # • • X . •• # • « • X • » 1». •- ft ••• ’ ' * • •• • X . • S3 S.F. S.F. =Hs S.F. ' a S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ?.F. S.F. 27^ S.F. S.F. * •. Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone ' - S.F. S.F. M S.F. S.F. S.'F. B /<?. X 100 -. S.F. . 9^9 B % .«•••• * mm »m m—' f :p/i • • » • t ’ = r’ , 4 m L; \ • • •••!' • /71 Yy-^Kj^ W L -&u;c. l^ ?ylTOiWEi»' HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK zone; (CIRCLE'one) 0~75;<:^25Q^ 250-500^ 500-1000' 0^, C=^'2~, Ex I ST IHardcover in Zone _ _ _’ X_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _= s.F.A. • House LENGTH WIDTH / / ^ • X L Cp.\^ c. Driveway . •B»»iuiniWix)b D.. Sidewalk ' E. Patio/ Deck F.Landscape areas UNDERLAIN BY . . PLASTIC . SHEETING * • • • • X X X X U au- G. Other .4o Total H ardcover in Zone • • • • Total Property Area in Zone «> • «« . >« •» t • • s.F. S.F. s.F. S.F. 37 s.F. . .*7SSO \* • •• S.F.•« # S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. wt( « ••S.F. . V- • mm m s.F. •M S.F. S.F. S.F. ZO • S.F. ?7S7^S.F. IZ-^^S.F. ^757 -^rri X100 - ■% »• »«> #••• ** ^ • • \ • > • • < « • T <»- * r A 'fiofo^eC' HARECQVER CALCULATION WORKSHEzi SETBACK ZONE: (CIHCLE CNE) Iz-LZ^250-5C-J' 5C0-1CC0' H ardcoveh in Zone A. House — le:igth WIDTH X: B. Garage c. D riveway X _ D. S^DEWALK 73 Z^.o E. Patio/ 13.0 3.‘l-J'-/ F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY t . PLASTIC SHEETING - X G. Other *'Total Hardcover in zone Total Property Area in Zone X 100 » JO^ = ^70 S. F • = 9^■ ■ S . F. \\ L V • • S.F. V S.F. S • F • S • r . S.F* 1'=' • S.F. =S.F. •• =S.F.• = /?y.z s.F.y’ z?y = . ns S.F. /f.f S.F. = rzr S.F. • S.F. • m • • ••S.F. • S.F.• S.F.3 /23ov S.F. ZorfG -;■ B ■ iri I ■ I I I ii~»M II* mirr ii«'Ixi wi >il n iirti 11 HARDCOVE? CALCULATIC ‘1 it'GRKSHEET ZONE: (circle one ) Q-75'25G-5G0' 5CC-10CQ^ H ardcoveh in Zone • • • ■• « { A. Hflll^c * _ X = ZYSA SI Ft L£;NGTH WrOTH • • .. X m _ S • r • X • • • S.F. • X • Si r i • • X • S f r • n, IZ-O y d>>/^= 7/ •S.F. • r, nofVP?rfAY X S.F. X • • n. <?rnrwA/ x ' X •0 St Ft • X S.F. X a S • r 1 E. ?ATIO/ • ““•< /oU AcL y =. y^-S«r . • • *• B. 1 ANn.^rApe ' ' • X - 7Z<C> ■■S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY . • X . Si r I PLASTIC • SHEETING X __3 S.F. • X • a • S. r» fi. Other ’ . x S.F. 0 V . • Total Hardcover in Zone - • • S.F. • • • • Total Property A rea in Zone ?7i?yC? :S.r. B (Tj 1] SycAc?Y 100 »% ••• MIL mm M s( 4| ) '>I U ”' ^I' .rfe ' ■:- . .VV- ' ■^i Mr ^w-nj. ;^.., .. ..i '■■ 1 • • W k.' . .■* '. • * '-■ ■ *■■•• ’ r.. r ■'.'*-•■■ ■ ^ ^> ' ?■ iis-*- m^m m 1^ . ,..:<*- if-5 r-'^■|'*!i:,-?^^£f(;»:-;p i -■ ■’%£3is^ .V -I.' •. i-J - • f -■ir-. . < . ~ rliv- ^ • . /*!^■-. •V. > ■ •>;!? • f4 '‘/t? . ' ,'■ •> •'.. ■■ /*- E^- .fe'’'^1^ ^•^W-'t- .,'*■ »■•... ^ ‘ ''*'i;^'^,* * -V ' t,'- < ' • '• ' ■-'• -'r •- ■'':-'‘v;^^.i*:'ia -'T?'!ih™feiWDll-^Sf;_^sv', ■. i-> .'. ■ ■vi ’ jr '7*. f j ■ < •»• •- ^ '* rn:w9sm LiKfc'? V ,i?y .: ■••1 ~ ’ '• V ■ ‘tM'V Vafi:jqs 'Tvf-’; ^ ";<■ *>*■ ^'.' . ••..' ' rr' m& , j iMMI ,' > ■ ■: <■< ( A^r.?^-; •, ;(;); *•■ *y-T lirty-w iS r ^ * r — If igii^ Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Michael P- Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:October 16, 1991 Subject: #1693 Albert D. Hanser, 1685 Fox Street - Sketch Plan, 5 Lot Subdivision - Request for Variance to Moratorium Zoning District: RR-IB, Single family rural residential, 2 acre, unsewered List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Application Plat Map Property Owner's List Subdivision Moratorium Ordinance Air Photo Survey/Sketch Plan Horatorium Variance Request The City Council on August 26, 1991 adopted a moratorixim on subdivisions within areas subject to the proposed Shoreland Regulations. The intent was to eliminate the possibility of new subdivisions being created under the current Code that prior to actual development would become subject to new, potentially more restrictive standards. Section 5 of the Moratorium Ordinance indicates that the Council may grant a variance if it is found that a proposal is not contrary to the intent of the Comprehensive Plan, that it is compatible with the proposed code amendments, that it promotes the health, safety and welfare, and that a hardship would be created if a variance is not granted. The applicant was advised by staff to bring this forward as a sketch plan rather than a full subdivision application, to minimize the eunount of staff time expended on the review process and delay applicant's full fee investment if a moratorium variance is not forthcoming. In reviewing whether a moratorium variance should be granted. Planning Commission should consider the following: 1.Does the proposal meet the intent of the Orono Comprehensive Plan for development in the rural area? 2.Does the proposed plan meet the standards being proposed for adoption in shoreland areas? 3.Does the proposed subdivision promote the general health, safety and welfare? 4 ■i i i- Zoning File #1693 October 16, 1991 Page 2 4. Is there a legitimate hardship borne by the applicant if a variance is not granted? Note that review and adoption of the proposed Shoreland Regulations is expected to be completed in February 1992, and although the ordinance is written to be effective for a period of one year, the Council most likely would terminate the moratorium when the new ordinance is adopted. The conformity of various aspects of this proposed subdivision with the new shoreland standards under review, will be addressed in the sketch plan review below. Sketch Plan Review This is a request to create four new 2+ acre building lots in addition to leaving the existing house on a 5+ acre parcel. The property Includes extensive wetland area and rolling hills. The following points are offered for consideration: 1. A 500' long private road and cul-de-sac is proposed to serve all 5 lots. There has been some discussion regarding retaining the second driveway access for the existing residence. 2. The 929.4^contour line defining the boundary of the dry land and wetland, also defines the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka/Tanager Lake, according to Ceil Strauss of the DNR. Absent any clearly defined continuous high ground which absolutely cuts off this wetland from direct connection with Tanager Lake, the wetland in the south one-third of the property is considered part of Lake Minnetonka by the DNR. This creates a number of significant questions, such as whether these lots are therefore riparian, whether or not the DNR/Watershed District/City/Corps of Engineers will allow dredging of a lake access channel or construction of lengthy docks to the open water. Additionally, it appears from air photos that to reach open water, such a channel or dock would have to cross adjacent properties. 3. The 929.4 defined shoreline coupled with the proposed "Recreational Development" classification of Tanager Lake, would require a 75* setback for on-site sewage treatment systems, and a 100' setback for structures in this unsewered area. Applicant's site evaluator/surveyor hwS shown tested drainfield sites meeting the 75' criteria, and proposed house locations that meet the 100* proposed structure setback. 3K"* * r. Zoning File #1693 October 16, 1991 Page 3 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. A brief review of the drainfield information indicates that all sites will likely require mound systems, and that there is very little flexibility in finding additional septic sites or revising the locations of the sites shown on most of the lots. In some cases those sites meet the MPCA/DNR 10' lot line setback standard, but not Orono's current 20' requirement. Topography and house positioning also limit the flexibility of the drainfield sites. Most of the sites are shown sized for a 4-5 bedroom mound system, but may not be expandable. In both Lots 2 and 5, there are likely to be driveway conflicts with the drainfield sites. The proposed house site on Lot 2 would be so restricted by the 100' shoreline setback and 20' drainfield setbacks that in staff's opinion this is not a reasonable lot. Lots 3, 4 and 5 are more flexible. Although no testing has been shown for Lot 1, the existing septic system appears to be functional and there appears to be substantial area available south of the house for replacements. An alternate site should be required to be tested as part of this subdivision. The wetland in the northeast quadrant of the property is about 2' above and not connected to the Tanager Lake wetland. The normal 26' wetland setback for structures and 75' setback for drainfields would apply. It appears that the proposed roadway will encroach on the 26' wetland setback on both sides of the road, hence a conditional use permit and variance appears to be required for that road grading and filling in the wetland. In Lots 3 and 5, it appears possible that driveways may encroach into 26' wetland setbacks, in order to avoid encroaching on septic sites or lot lines. Each lot contains at least 2.0 acres of contiguous dry buildable land. Lots 2 and 4 do not meet the 200' width standard at the 50’ street setback, but do meet a 200' width at the proposed 100' setback from the 929.4 contour line. Lot 1 with the existing house, does not have 200’ at the shoreline. The Orono Lake Use Committee has suggested that for "lakeshore lots", setbacks be measured at the shoreline and at the required lake setback line, but not at the street setback line. 1 i HU.* Zoning File #1693 October 16, 1991 Page 4 9.In general, the concept of a private road and cul—de“ sac appears reasonable for this property. The location and topography near the existing house would not allow for a reasonable road connection to the adjacent property to the west, nor is such a connection needed. Staff Recoomendation I. II. Isv Because this is a sketch plan, the Planning Commission should merely give applicants general direction and note any obvious concerns that should be addressed as follows: A.Conditional use permit/variance for wetland encroachments by roads and driveways. B.Requirement to construct private *"oad with standard easements and covenants. C. D. Lot width variances. Revisions of lot lines to allow for reasonably developable sites, especially Lot 2. E.Verification of capability/expandability of drainfield sites and adherence to 20' lot line setbacks. F.General advisory regarding the need for wetland easements. Note that the wetlands at the north end of Lot 1 and straddling the north end of Lots>2 and 3, likely will be subject to wetland easements although they do not appear on Orono's designated wetland maps. Regarding the variance to the moratorium, the Planning Commission must make a recommendation to the Council whether or not the strict criteria for a moratorium variance are met, and whether granting a variance to the moratorium for this proposed subdivision would be in the best interests of the City. (Note that your recommendation regarding the moratorium will be scheduled for the October 28 Council meeting so that the applicants receive a timely decision whether or not they can proceed with a full subdivision application). I r \ ^XTY OP 'ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION j, Site Address /6'f5 J'T'/Cfrr H • r \ M M 1 :-xr. r) r'l V M • V. ^_ _ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) -// 7-2J - VV -y<72 - // 7-2i -y/- Please check one - Property abstract or ~co:>!f‘ —oooi; torrens? Attach legal description to application. APPLICAMT Phone (home ) Neune A///^SC/I Phone (work) Address: 7*S City;Zip:Tj»7/ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (heme) Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels CITY QF CRDtiO FIrmE OFFICE i y^YrVutnnM i 1/VVV» Development Size /y. y /j~. n T 2 9. J f f w m m m m 01 GEi^ 200. Acres Dry Land ^"o^rrorlru^/^A-"^ mil parcels^M Present Use (check)Residential; no, of units Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ / Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes X Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:Existing Units ” New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density:Units per /y. V Acres Minimum Lot Size:2. /fcfifS Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check)Residential Other (specify) r>*u #rawtw^f-^J 2. MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 3. 4. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official’s Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III)$150.00 Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement 250.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision)250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential ) 300.00 + 20.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant' s Signature , Owner's Signature Date Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an KUthorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning 3ffice of this change prior to the meeting. . fkl> L CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION ■n-1 Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50,00 par each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) rr JL V PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address /f S'^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 03 -/f7 -000/ oZ- //'?-23 - iJ - Oao> -Ooo V — (foos Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Phone (home) y ^ 3 ALncn.T D Address: J7/^rr7 _ _ _ Phone (work) 3 3> ^ ^ City: /oifrZ^T/l Zip:_£££l/____ OWNER (if different than applicant) Ncune _________________ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City;Zip: Date Property Acquired (raonth/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT OSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Cpesidential Other (specify) DESCR: iTION OP REQUEST Desc‘?i V® request in detail: Estimated Construction Cost $ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) Other /V ^,14 ifiiiiaiHiHliiiaiiftilii r HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical di enforcement of zoning regulations:_ _ _ X x3Sii^ DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements;^_ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -■ 2. !■ 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8ij"xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8J;"xll"). Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8*s"xll"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above infonnation has not been included. APPLIC;^' S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date ONNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agentif. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of this request. Owner * s Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. r t 12) 1 • m' «'" J ff ► » II !t\ ^15) B *• * H J (ft)'* (71 i"\mi ?(i)f-T • (10)^^ II 1 (Q) i ? .• I ■ . 'rt f ^ r: ! RUN DATE 09/23/91 BATCH 001 DROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR QkHER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OltCR NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OltCR NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR y. HEN^CPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST 3B 02-117-23 32 0002 01520 FOX ST KATHARINE S TEARSE KATHARINE S TEARSE 1520 FOX ST NAYZATA MN 55391 ^ 000236 02-117-23 33 01965 FOX ST GAL CAPP GEORGE O A LYNDA H CAPP 1965 FOX ST NAYZATA m 55391 36 02-117-23 33 0005 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED ALBERT D HANSER ALBERT 0 HANSER 3600 IDS CENTER HPLS m 55902 36 03-117-23 91 0009 01620 FOX ST THE HAKEFIELD ORONO PTNRSHP THE NAKEFIELD ORONO PTNRSHP C/0 ROBERT J THEILER P 0 BOX 9300 DEPT 28 HPLS m 55990 36 10-117-23 11 ODOl 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED SUAD H AZHARI SUAD H AZHARI 1795 FOX ST NAYZATA m 55391 ^ * .; ^ ‘ r’ ‘ * • ' . . • . • i. >• •♦ »f A lusjittiaiiiudii 38 02-117-23 32 0003 01590 FOX ST J A NOLAN A J A NOLAN JOHN A NOLAN A JOAN A NOLAN 1590 FOX ST NAYZATA HN 55391 •38 02-117-23 33 0003 * 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIG^4E0 ALBERT D HANSER ALBERT 0 HANSER 3600 IDS CENTER t ’ MPLS MN 55902 38 02-117-23 33 0010 01910 SHORELINE DR A HARRISON AIL HARRISON ALFRED I INGRID L HARRISON 1910 SHORELINE DR HAYZAT* 55391 38 03-117-23 99 0001 01685 FOX ST SALLY D HANSER SALLY 0 HAfiSER 1685 FOX ST NAYZATA m 55391 38 11-117-23 22 0009 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED BURLINGTON NORTHERN RY BURLINGTON NORTHERN RY REPORT NO. PI935901 PAGE 1 38 02-117-23 33 01985 FOX ST RICHARD H PERKINS RICHARD H PERKINS 1985 FOX ST NAYZATA MN 55391 0001 38 02-117-23 33 0009 00038 ADDRESS IA4ASSIGNED ALBERT D HANSER ALBERT D HANSER 3600 IDS CENTER MPLS MN 55902 38 03-117-23 91 0003 01700 FOX ST CRAIGBANK ASSOCIATES CRAIGBAtOC ASSOCIATES PO BOX 9300 DEPT 28 HPLS MN 55990 eo 38 03-117-23 44 0002 01795 FOX ST SUAD H AZHARI SUAD H AZHARI 1795 FOX ST NAYZATA 55391 TOTAL BATCH 001 00019 • ! . » • , . I•»*1 ? . • V ■' J I ism ORDINANCE NO. 96. 2nd Series • • ’ AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN INTERIM MORATORIUM ON THE GRANTING OF LAND SUBDIVISIONS THAT HAVE NOT RECEIVED PRELIMINARY - • APPROVAL FROM THE CITY^ w THE CITY OF.ORONO ORDAINS: The Munidpal Code of the CiN of Orono is amended by adding Ordinance Iw. 92:2nd Series SECTION 1. SatamenIf of Policy. City ii pre The City Council, finds that the City it presently faced with the potential of applications for subdivision of larrd within 1,000 feet of lakes and 300 feet or the flood plain of certain tributaries within the City Ivnits. The City is in the process, of studying and preparing comprehensive amendment of its shoreline regulations. The City Coundl finds that there is an overwhelming probability that shoreline regulations will need to be updated and revised. The City Council also finds that such amendments cannot be accomplished until further study has bean competed and a hearirw held. since enactment of such amendments will undoubtedly modify existing regulations oonoeming subdivision of land, the processing of applications during this interim period would be detrimental to the effectuation of proposed standard amendments and contra^ to the purpose of the zoning enabling act. Minnesota Statutes 4S2.351. et sea. The City Council further finds that it would be unwise, improper, and unjust to allow individual development to occur ouring this study period and would allow discrimination and unfair advantage to a few to the detriment of the entire City. Therefore, the City Council finds it necessary and appropriate to adopt an Interim Ordinance ursuant to Minnesota Statutes 462.355, *T* Qfi^trictions on the pursue .Subd.4 SECTION 2. ________________ Granlifyi of Subdiviaion Aoplimtionit No land subdivision applications, except for those that already have received preliminaiy approval and for a subdivision appKcation of a property governed by a settlement agreement between me Cities of Long Lake and Orono. shall be granted for any purpose , that would berninconsistent with me applications as of the date of adoption of this Ordinance and to any subsequent applications. .- SECTION 3. Restricted' Area. The portion of the City of Orono that shall be subject to the restrictions of this Ordinance is all the land contained within the area desaibed as follows: ' - All properties within tfie City of Orono located wHhin 1,000 feet of me Ordinary High \Abter Mark of the following lakes: ' Lake Katrina Lake Classen Dickeys Lake Woisfeid Lake Lor^Lake Lydiard Lake Mooney Lake Hadley Lake ' Tanager Lake French Lake Forest Lake - I a. Lake Minnetonka and associated bays and All properties within the City of Orono '. located within 300 feet or the flood plain of the : following tributaries: . r •* ' Painters Creek (Sections 30. 31 T118N R23W) ' ‘Stubbs Bay Creek ” (Sections 32, 33 T118N R23W and Sections 4, 5 T117N R23W) ‘Dickey Lake Creek ” (Sections 27. 34 T118N R23W) • -.1 ‘Wolsfeld/Holy Name Creek ’ (Sections 26.27.35T118N fl»W) - Long Lake Creek (Sections 34 35 T118N R23Wand Sections 3,10 Til7N R23W) •Forest Lake Creek ” (Sections 8.7 Tl 7N R23W) - ... • ' SIiECTION 4. Duration. This ordinance shall be effective for a period of one year, unless the City Coundl determines that it is no longer required because me requisite studies have been completed and adopted and that appropriate evaluation and action, induding any necessary revisions of me Zoning Code, have been finalized..The duration of mis Ordinance may be extended by adoption of a subsequent ordinance, for a total additional period of eighteen months SECTION 5. Variances. The City Coundl may orant a variance to mis Ordinance if me City L^ndl finds after careful review of all the facts that a proposal is not contrary to me intent of the Comprehensive Plan, mat it is compatible wim the zoning and offidal control amendments being considered by me City, that it promotes me heaim, safety, and welfare of me dtizens, and that a failure to grant a variance would create a hardship for me applicant SECTION 6. Separability. Every section, provision, or part of mis Ordinance is declared separable from every other section, provision, or part and, if any section, provision, or part thereof or action taken hereunder shall be held invalid, it shall not affect any other section, provision, or part SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance is effective upon adoption by me City Coundl. Adopted by the City Coundl of me City of Orono on me 26m day of August 1991, by a vote of 4 ayes and 0 n^s. . • ATTEST: ’ •• Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk . Barbara A. Peterson. Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing Instrument . was Tore m •I*... acknowledged before me on mis day August, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson and Doioihy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono. a Minnesota municipal corporation and saio instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public ♦ ^ . (Published in The Laker and Pioneer Sept. 2, 1991) Afffdav state of Minnesota Bill Holm, being dul an authorized agen'. of the newspaper kn nesota, and has full I stated below: A.) The newspaper I ments constituting newspaper, as pre 331A.02, 331A.07, amended. B.) The printed. which is attached w newspaper, and was week for____ / It was first publis vJjthe J2J£r day i and was thereaft Monday, to and ii the day ( I vmNPti HE^ My oocr Subscribed and swo 'd day of_ I •• Li ‘-m C\ J '/ / Z W/ /y/ \ \ • ^ I I . >------- \ " ' ^,L/ .j ■*// /''' '///''' T' ^ /' 1 / < \ ^/i \ 4^.01 I / / / » » / ' \ / ‘" w** y \/ K ''t\r / A"', ::\- V. Vru Xj., \ . \V "" \' A . /-. ' y / ^ y ' y P / -T-* / JL#4 t ite . K \ .-'A/ •"• '1' 1 ____ ^ ^ • • • • » r;- t 1 .# 4 1 t ) m IX To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Moorse Froa: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: October 15, 1991 #1694 Douglas Merz, 3195 Watertown Road Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) - Side/street setback variance required for proposed addition to rear of existing residence. Required =50' Proposed = 1' [Addition to be extended along existing substandard setback line] Setback to paved portion of Leaf St. = 21' Variance * 49' or 98% 1 Section 10.3, Subdivision 14 (C) - Lot coverage. Total lot area = + or - 47,349 s.f. or 1.08 acres Allowed lot coverage = 7,102 s.f. or 15% Proposed = 1,968 s.f. or 4.15% No variance required List of Exhibits i 'i Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Application Property Owners List Plat Map Sur rey Footprint/First Floor Septic Report Staff Sketch 1-2 First and Second Floor Plans East Elevation Description of Request In July of 1988, applicant was granted side street setback variance for decks installed along ncrth and east side of residence. Applicant now proposes a two story addition to the rear or south side of the existing residence. A 16'x24' addition will be placed no closer to the right-of-way of Leaf Street than existing residence located 1' from west side lot line. The paved portion of Leaf Street is located approximately 21' from structure. Review Exhibits H, 1 and 2. The proposed two story addition will provide a family room and hall on the first floor and a master bedroom addition on the second floor. Zoning File #1694 October 15, 1991 Page 2 The current septic system has been designed to maintain a three bedroom home. Former bedroom on main floor must be altered to prevent a fourth bedroom use. Applicant proposes alteration of existing door to the room proposed now as a den and has suggested a cased opening. In further consideration by staff, we would recommend an arched entrance way as it is the desire of the applicant to facilitate access to the newly defined den and bathroom along west side of the residence from living room. The doors of the detached garage are located on the west side. The turnaround or backout area prevent expansion to the east side of structure. Applicant also notes interior layout of existing house and the impact on exterior design of house. Description of Hardships Review Exhibit A, Applicant's Hardship Statement. In discussions with applicant, applicant has noted other hardships such as layout of existing residence, location of doors on detached garage requiring room for turnaround prevents placing addition further to east side. There is no impact on existing septic as residence will be maintained at three bedroom level. No other variances are required as a result of this improvement. Please note any recommendation for approval must include the condition that requires the structural modification of the access door to the proposed den area from the living room on the first floor. iaiil I ail I iiilMiMiiiiiil iniiiii MiiyiliTlilin'iiiiHl M .11 iMiii* CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION LL•«Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance)y j Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) o V; I- <iJ PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address v. cm OF omo C f>hSnCCTPC r xirntfi^L. ui I ALfim 1350200000 01 OEM 175.00 CHECK R 175.00 uLrCTC-T^rUAitk' VnUf 11 initix I ufU rn/M Oni TiiyrriLtUT I IV wva Mvi iaa^a r“iO /S*7 / 'I •?/ ?^^ Rcqfj 1-<C\ he M^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 0^’-'//^00^-3^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name I- Phone (home) _ _ _ Phone (work) Y'/nffrFfU/A Pmtj City :Z- Of'aJ^kp.^ OWNER (if different than ap^lican^ Name _ _ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT OSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning Distric Present Use of Property {rR!^ Residential Other (specify) DBSCRIPTIOH OF REQUEST Describe reque Estimated Construction Cost $, Descrioe reque VARXAHCBS RBQOIBED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) Other J HARDSHIP . . , , . ^Describe undue hardship or practical^^diffxcu^ty^ enforcement of zoning re'enforcement of zoning : DESCRI^ION OP ifNUSDAL PROP)DESCRIPTION OP IJNUSDAL PROPER' , ^ -u' r, • Describe unusual prooerty conditions ^eventing compliance with Zoning^/m/ /M a/.(juju- - - - - - - - - i A/n 2. 3. 4. REQUIICED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must ootain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). _ Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll" for reproduction). . , . Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8J;"xll"). SJcetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy a^-'x!!"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete—if—the— orwiat;-} on has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay adaitional fees (sta. .. time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and corr^t to the best of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's Signature Date ^ / / / amnsRS signature , . ^ ^ ..u ^ The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification/<)f this request. Owner's Signature --- Date ___— Applicant must have all siicmittals intone City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is aVe?/rn^rourp\^c^e Office of this change prior to the meeting. mm DATE 09/15/n. v- <. ' . v V • t. .• V MTCH 004 PROF ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER MAHE/AOOR PROP AOOR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR ♦ PROP AODR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR * .1 ^*’i UK ; HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INfORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OltCRS LIST * 36 04-117-23 22 0003 0319S HATERTOItl RO D E MERZ IDF HERZ DOUGLAS E I DIANE F HERZ > 3195 NATEMOItl RD LONG LAKE. HN 55356 36 04-117-23 22 0008 00065 CYGNET PL DIANE L KOEPKE DIANE L K0EP:CE 65 CYOCT PUCE LONG LAKE m 55356 . . i •• 36 05-117-23 11 0005 00095 LEAF ST E C 6RAHAH JR ETAL E C GRAHAM JR 95 LEAF ST LONG LAKE HN 55356 I*• . TOTAL BATCH 004 00009 . I. • . • • ! '•‘i *.•' ♦ * * ; ^ . •• •' :.‘V ' . <•1.. 1 « H f • . V .-•r » • *. ' * • • • t ‘ . S, f rn fti 38 04-117-23 22 0004 00080 LEAF ST SHIRLEY HALL SHIRLEY A HALL 80 LEAF ST LONG LAKE Hi 55356 38 04-117-23 22 0009 00085 CYGNET PL 0 J EHALT ETAL GREGORY J EHALT 105 CYGNET PUCE LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 32-118-23 44 0013 03220 HATERTOItl RO H HENDERSON I R L HENDERSON MILLIAM I ROSLYN L HENDERSON 150 HILDHURST RO TOrtCA BAY HN 55331 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 13 38 04-117-23 22 0007 00025 CYGNET PL JOSEPH S I AHI L FISCHER JOSEPH S I AHI L FISCHER 25 CYGNET PLACE LONG LAKE Hi 55356 * . . ..... 38 05-117-23 11 0001 03245 NATERTOm RO CIA RHAME CARL P RHAHE 3245 HATERTOHN ROAD LONG LAKE HN 55356 it 38 33-118-25 32 0001 03140 HATERTOItl RD DORSET DEVELOPMENT INC laNGSORIDGE PROPERTIES INC 3125 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 Oc; ./p /■ ■ i • « •\ * I I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEItlEPIN COUNTY DEPARJMENJ OF PROPERT]f T^^TIONt TO IHE BEST OF HY KNOHLEOGE AND BELIEF. DAT mm/.I • •t • f • • .» • I J ■/W 1%^ f ,1 M b ' /• >.4 Ae;?/ St 8 '/ ••I »*. I« • r 9 • • i_ f» • .•.* •* t. ■^LoTi. • Avd:'Suh*^Afo.Z3c •• .1 r<,' ^ y.>• X • •• • •* *.•••.•. \33 ^ 5> ■ ^* .•1 • •• V. ^ I I __^tz.y^ 'Ll0,^3 «ft* oi^e ( . -t* ’■ ' -' • • • J ,-*vi - ' • • 'L .f . •' * . * * it * • , •*> i hetctu ethft/tf ih9f 1 his !*s 9 cohtcti t^pteseitrat/»H o/^ si^veii •/ Lot 1^ i*n dyai*Uts jfohdiCfSich A/o,230. Cjfu 0-f OtOho .93 SvtvCiieJ hhdet^ tni^ SUf>€4-vtSicn Jaif ' t #< B-*>• A *■•• *• f _ ♦ > •j'*' ’4>. . • *, .Stilt I" ^io' .:'t!:•;•? ' • ••..% ;■ ' ;• •. « V• ' VT • -' * • ■» # OtndUs pt*htvr%f Cchhcnf fk'. •! • W^a^jL VJ\o «. f •% .• ^J2»a_Ci % •• Jf Ail H.M.__llhO • *•• • > 00 I ^ I ^ (% Vi ' ni p o u I Koch ’s Soel Testing P.O. Box 81 Loretto. MN 55357 Tel: (612)479-2637 0/?3/ Doua *^ertz 3r>'’'i V>tert''*vn iC'l, Crono, Tinn. Job Jite; 3195 Wfltcrtov/n kd., Uron Minn, Ji28B89 Pr**vioup rorcc*].f»tion test flnd soil borinos v.f're in :)ept. 1986 et tlio ^bove lot, the evorr^o mrc'^l^tion ra*^e 4f>,5 min/in. Jrry -^oils were encounter at 3 ft.- < ft., tlm tiu sp soils rmrted vlth arid I 8 Visibly lir.7.inc7 notion occi:rc;d ) the Cilv inspector ( Mr. Mike Gaffron )deteiniire that this •. ns the mottled roil level. • ».'cte rnottlrd noil IS consid.'r thr- hich ser.son->l water tnbl«i #“nd is an indientor oi saturated soil conditions. Grono icquiies that the minninum def'«th to mottllcd soil l'»* deeper b. forc a standard drainfield ‘can be inolailod. tharofo wit.i the above information n pressurized mound sysrera is needed. The size ot mound needed for s 3 bedroom home ( bsnnd on 4Sl oal/dev daily wster usosme I would bo bO ft. lorn by 3’.5 ft. wide ( 2308 so ft be pressurized , theiiforo a punmtanlc ( lU-C gal, ) and must be insts led. f... elarm syst-m ( both a souLarfrUoht alarm ) must be. installed, in the liou.-.e to indicate pump failure. mound this sand should be checked o«it by the local insnoctor to make sure it meets the spnciiicat clieuld he kept off the r'ronosrd .meund area to avoid cemnapli n owner! off by^he date Lvaluator /Cr-i koburt /*., Koch L' ^ ^N<,«4cAJ OF eknrjSjcAj Suurtc^ fA/ *:»r^* 'TUxi U.'TBJOm.I/O^pT^OaJ r I OiattSH USSIUM Uii'tA • * « A Sewega Flow Rato (based on fable It Minnesota Kulesi Mart TOOOJ C^/’ • ^ House J DP |[pd Volume > /OCX) Typ9 B Septic TtnK C Soil Cliarateristicsi ' • e 1 Uepth to high seasonal ions of saturation level • • . y. h- p M. A»)unt pr Material beaded! 1 S*nd I I'*5 rt ihiokj _l_3>cl/_ou. yda, ^rru^t, /C*^, ^ 2 KocK y l,r> ft. thick; .> y‘l9. oP/*/^ ion ~ 3 ' Sandy Loa» 0 ft. thick;_ _ _ _ _^cu. yds. It *. Topsoil i6" thick; cu. yds. Munping Tank Capacityt 1 )nco cal tank ia; ,l\Diplng rata ib; Raaerte capacity ealicna / eyoXe with at laant 1| cycXas/day ) O gnl ^aea enclosed design; thio xnciudoB dralnbacic oaJ.cvdi\tio(i ’</^/)cu^Ji?a4»y^.J^J^^ ■ “ 13 (a'^O ‘ ■ ‘ ruurp Size 1 ^ nr vgai/»»in; pry}Ups Inatall an Alam tTstom Ir. the houee to IndJcate puinp failure Instaili both a sound and a light alarm. rerforated ULstnbution Mipe 1 2 3 IV., in ^ Idanxter Lineal ('tUx ^xcA = 3^/ -'W-') t/d " perforated holes space at 3(o apart f • r 1* - «■./• Solbackat . Tanks • .• • lo from property line from veil M ITom huildliu IToatment Area: lVo:a lake fror\ 8ti^o»:j ;- from property Una from well'iTom buJ.ld?.\ic9 < ^0 from trees /oil .-. r « • • ♦ i- f C 1 Ltl iliilftaiiriMiiiiiiimitiii III K — _•' r; i^,-'“7?; •*■;'*’r::.***^!. ‘ . .S'/' •• . •' V ■•' •■ ■. ' ■ ■'•• y| ^^rr2r.'-^*0 /et i . V ■V rv;'■ca Ta I /A)C, />r />'ov:(r/pt.K*t/ifirtL. IDEHTIFICWION OF PREMISES REQUIRED ived Aud^py'^"' Ue Duo'ayfld. I Pl».f V Visible At ri LcRible From The r ‘ y^yfi L»» •I - nQ fP Stiff Ffonbng lie Property, A-'i; ■■ y -f 'r ^ !c* • A ;* ..•>.. .■. .f 1. • < .•> ir’Sf- v^. .rl O'- '^'^•■' • ;,u V^ U[ ps f AI uj AdJ i 0 Xuz o tft bJ Ct < 3 O Ul zo Ho Ui<n V) 0 K U Nno '• J hi O < = / . uj>H.. 1uz o h tf)u K < 3 O 2 O hu y tfi tf) V) O K O N oz ju Q < H u J To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building s Zoning Administrator Date:October 17, 1991 Subject:#1696 Stephen & Joanie Ward, 4695 North Shore Drive Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB, Lakeshore residential, 1 acre minimum Pertinent Ordinances 1.Section 10.75, Subd. 3 - Additional heights on sloping lots. "On any lot sloping downhill from the street, which has an average ground slope on that portion of a lot to be occupied by the main building of 25% or more (measured in the general direction of the side lot lines). An additional 12' of height may be permitted in such main building and the garage or parking space may be in the required front yard provided a yard of 10' or more is maintained." A. B. Allowed height. Based on the above Code section, the principal building is located on a slope of 26-31%. An increase of 12' is allowed for principal structure. Total allowed = 42' Proposed at lakeside = 39' Height at street elevation = 20' No variance required. Street setback. 10' was proposed by applicant. 35' is required per the LR-IB zoning district for street setback of principal structure. In early discussions with applicant, a garage addition was proposed at the County road level. The preliminary design shewed a first level floor beneath the garage with connecting breezeway type addition to the main residence. In those early discussions staff considered the structure predominately a garage addition and qualified under the above section. In a later revision a full third story appeared for the master bedroom s^iite. Question for the Planning Commission, "Is this a "main" building c : garage addition?" Per LR-IB Standards Required = 35' Proposed = 10' Variance =21' or 71% Per Section 10.75, Subdivision 3 Allowed = 10' Proposed = 10' (does not include enchoachment of upper level deck) Zoning File #!696 October 17/ 1991 Page 2 2,Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Lakeshore hardcover. A. 0-75' setback area = 2841 s.f. 121 s.f. or 4.26% per applicants hardcover facts 149 s.f. or 5.24%* per staff's inspection * Additional hardcover results from 12' x 12' deck installed over existing shed resulting in 28 s.f. of additional hardcover. There is also a 12' x 16' deck that extends over the portion of the property located below the 929.4 elevation. Applicant has credited 80 s.f. against his property. Total area of the deck is 192 s.f. Staff ^as no record of a building permit being issued for either the deck above the shed nor the deck structure installed at the lakeshore. B.75-250' setback area = 8,389 s.f. Allowed = 2,097.25 s.f. or 25% Existing = 1,671.1 s.f. or 19.92% Proposed = 2,976.41 s.f. or 35% Hardcover variance = 879.16 s.f. or 10.4% List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Applicants Addendum E - Application for a Driveway Permit from Hennepin County F - Survey Information G - Hardcover Fact Sheets, 0-75', 75-250', Existing and Proposed H - Staff Sketch Determining Height I - Packet - Includes Floor Plans, Elevations, etc. Descxiption of Request Please refer to Exhibit D. Staff can confirm applicant removed the former garage located predominately in County right- of-way over some 10 years ago. No City has the right to ask for a structure to be removed unless it is in a deteriorated or hazardous condition. In the case of this structure, because of its location in the right-of-way, the Department of Transportation would probably have recommended that it be rebuilt out of the County right-of-way. The original garage was a single stall garage. The County right-of-way has served as a parking area for this property these last 10 years. It should also be noted that all of the properties along North Shore Drive make similar use of the County right-of-way. Early in the review staff advised Mr. Ward to contact the County to determine what they would approve as far as an approved drive within the right- of-way. Mr. Ward is advised that Dave Zetterstrom of the County has recommended that the doors face out to street with turn lanes provided as shown on Survey Sketch, Exhibit F. •I 2 Zoning File #1696 October 17, 1991 Page 3 The 23' X 35' addition consists of a full basement, first floor {faunily room/bedroom), second level garage and third floor master bedroom. Staff has questioned the applicant as to the size of the footprint of the addition, noting that it is larger than the existing principal structure and asked if certain elements of structure could be reduced. Applicant advises that the two-stall garage is needed and that the interior access stairs at an 8' width is needed to serve both the lower levels and upper level of the master bedroom. Review Exhibit I, the elevations, profiles and floor plans. There is no feasible way to connect a stairs access to the third level in the new addition via the existing portion of the house. The only interior access to lower levels and original house portion is via down staircase (4' of additional width). The only access to upper level is via up staircase (4' of additional width). If a total of 8' is needed for stairs, then two-stall garage occupies 27' of width. Note applicant proposes no change in the existing portion of the residence. The existing exterior access stairs shall be removed and rebuilt in a safer manner, certainly with handrails meeting all UBC standards. Mr. Ward advised that a policeman in making an attempt to get down to their residence slipped and fell in icy conditions during the winter. This is a continuous problem and the main reason for the proposed interior access in the addition. Applicant proposes three decks from the master bedroom level. The deck facing the lake will be extended over the existing roof requiring no additional approvals of hardcover or setbacks. The deck to the west side results in 24 s.f. of additional hardcover (8' x 3'). Deck to the north is proposed at merely a 1-1/2' width. Applicant asks if the 1-1/2' deck would be the same as a 1-1/2' overhang which is considered a non­ encroachment into a setback area. The deck structure requires a setback and would result in an additional setback variance of 1- 1/2' into the proposed 10' street setback. Note per hardcover facts this was not included because it was placed over the paved drive area. Staff comments regarding existing and proposed hardcover improvements also noting area and percentages of hardcover resulting with these improvements. A.Proposed addition. If interior access is desired requiring the 8' of width to provide a staircase both to an upper and lower level, then possibly the two- stall garage could be reduced from 27* in width to 24' resulting in the final footprint of 736 s.f. or 8.7% (two-stall garage 24' x 23') as opposed to the proposed 805 s.f. at 9.5%. Applicant should be asked to respond. iiH Zoning File #1696 October 17, 1991 Page 4 B.The proposed 4' exterior access stairs results in 148 s.f. or 1.76% hardcover. To be consistent with other lakeshore lots with steep topography, very often these are excluded from hardcover calculations. The Planning Commission may wish to consider final hardcover facts excluding the 4' staircase. In fact, applicant should be encouraged to construct safe access stairs down to lakeshore yard. Staff cautions all members who proceed to trudge down the lakeshore yard as it is in a hazardous condition when wet with leaves on ground. C. Upper level deck along west side of house proposed at 24 s.f. (8 3') or .3% hardcover. Is this essential to structure? D.The area measuring 9' x 15' on west side of garage resulting in 135 s.f. or 1.6% hardcover could be grassed rather than paved. Note the 10' - 55' yard in street yard is shown as paved to provide off-site parking for visitors. Applicant may be asked to trim back portions of this paved area. E.Trade-offs in the 0-75' setback area. Members may take issue with the magnitude of the proposed structure. Staff would ask that you look at the structures on either side of Ward's property. The one to the west is a multi-level A-frame structure and to the east a much larger multi-storied structure facing lakeside. The pattern for all of the houses along North Shore Drive West has been to make use of the County right-of-way to facilitate access to and from the site. The Planning Commission just reviewed a similar access use for the property to the immediate west. The key for this review is to determine if the 10% increase in hardcover can be reduced. Description of Hardship Once again staff would refer you to Exhibit D. Applicant has listed a most complete list of hardships. It should also be noted that there is no impact on the lake views of the homes on the adjacent properties as both homes are located at or near the 75' setback line. Staff would ask that you review sheet 1 of Exhibit I. Note the location of the well to the structure and lot line. Now review Exhibit F that shows a 6 foot retaining wall to the immediate north. The State advises that a 3 foot setback has been maintained and that it is feasible to maintain or secure the well from the upper elevation. The State advised the City to ask a well contractor to provide written confirmation that the well can be serviced as shown on plans. This should be included as a condition of approval. ■li " mm 111 I ft ft I ....J city op OROHO - VARIMCB APPLICATION -nitial !"2t!onai°varianc,)■ ($50.00 per eac.T additio h "'v ;•) ‘ H- ( cin OF » l^!jVt!vvyi/\/_. j •rr’ i\/\,ZZi vakance Af;rr-fhr4:=fB:er^D=uble__a;pp_Ucation_5ee,vl lEH ‘ CHFCK Tl ‘‘-■OOJLt k II 1 I w?* V^r TtCEIpT-THAf^K ti224E20 cool property location rv • ffni'Hfi (Orono)# Min nBSotsSite Address_f691NorthSiH^Da^^ property I<ie“ti£ication Number (P.I^D^^^®.^ included on Attach legal description to app required survey applicant Neune Stephen & Joanie Ward Phone (home) _§l^iiiZ2li®Z2. Phone (work), 612-^71-0723 r-ify- Mniind (Oronpj —. Address♦ zi^95 North Shnn-^Drive _____________________________________ _________________________________ Phone (home)_-----------------------— OWBR (if different than applicant) Phone (work)^----------------— Name Same As City: Address : Date property Acquired _Se ptember 1 ,973 Zip: (month/year) . ,«..U .... - ---------------- present osb op p«op®^ ... L 6.— IPresent Zoning District -w- - - , - <;inqle Familypresent Use of Properw/ -------- Residential Other (specify) ___________j.T-,1 ____ _____I 1* nn rnnt ^ 50.000*00 r^'pi'l^ o; E«OEST construction ------------ ^ See *^pnarate AttaghjDescribe request in detail " ■ --------- variances required Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front XXXXX Hardcover Side _____ ’ Other L... ji i. iHtl.iNTtatntsapM r .ftiliil .tDSElF i ;h; Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty -“sultiro ^ enforcement of zonino reaulations: -on f ^ strict, - —wus.------5gg -"enarafp Af<-arh»H D^no •. > DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Co^rn!® property conditions preventing conoliance with Zonino code Requirements: Described in above Hardship verMnn nn' _____ '****** I « ■ M h* Wa I I I > < iTi I, • g 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. 8. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS le Completed Application Form th^^ust Jrrrr^ °^tain348-327U. Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center PXat Map (obtained with property owners list). survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include reprodultio°n).° required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll" for Topographic survey (existing and prooosed eie«va^7nnei <4? u in existing grade are proposed (provide one cooy a>."xn”)^ changes Sketches or plans of floor s elevation views (provide 1 cony 8!,"xll») anv othe application, please attach a seoar"e Ust ofany other persons you wish notified of this application Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. The Applicant and Property Owner cs«-rrs +-v, • •, . remember that ygur varfance^ ariica^i^^^ Infomatxon has not been included. -----^~—~—above applicant * S SIGNATURE Jf 4m supplied is Applicant's Signature true and cornet to the best of his/her knowledge. Date OWHEkS signature I®”-? ^5=^®®= to this application 0^ and furtherauthorizes reasonable entry onto the prooerty by Citv stiff . — -"pur“:e“' o;7n%“e“ta:tion ana verification of this arequest. -------------v,=z,ua.y« ^er^s Signature \4j cate 0^ I'^l ] ^ I Applicant must have all submittals into t7e"crt7office727davs'b^ ^hSrSln?aT7/ea"ch"rntl- /pVric^L^rut^t:" '’®^" ^*’® te ro*7ttrndn“:he^^Ti""V®®^®" c:-L%7“^ran*7"p;itrarL" th!r ‘h*“*”" %ur;ia ”7e a^nd^Vo^ adv *se"th7\7 ”rjdinrs*’z:ningOffice of this change prior to the meeting. RUN DATE D9/2S/91 BATCH 002 « PROP AOIIR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR % PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 4 • r PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR * r C C 38 07-11*' tl 32 0003 09725 TCMUVIEH U EAT CHRISTIANSON EARL A TERRY CHRISTIANSON 9691 TONKA VIEN LANE HOUND m 55369 38 07-117-23 32 0026 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED RICHARD A LAU6HLIN RICHARD LAUGHLIN 9635 TONKAVIEH RD ORONO HN 55369 38 07-117-23 32 0059 01395 REST POINT LA S L HILLIREN ETAL SAHUEL L HILLIREN 1395 REST POINT LANE HOUND m 55369 38 07-117-23 32 0059 09695 NORTH SHORE DR STEPHEN C A JOANNE A HARO STEPHEN C HARO 9695 NORTH SHORE OR HOUND HN 55369 V. r\ HEftlEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OItttRS LIST ♦ 36 07-117-23 32 0016 09731 NORTH SHORE OR DENNIS A HEYER DENNIS A HEYER 9680 NORTH SHORE DR HOUND m 55369 38 07-117-23 32 0050 09680 NORTH SHORE DR DENNIS A HEYER DENrnS A HEYER 9680 NORTH SHORE OR HOUT40 HN 55369 38 07-117-23 32 0056 09685 NORTH SHORE DR T C CORBIN A J L HISFELDT T C CORBIN A J L HISFELDT 9685 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND HN 55369 TOTAL BATCH 002 00010 * / •i . • %REPORT NO. P14S5401 PAGE 3 • • 38 07-117-23 32 0017 09725 NORTH SHORE DR J P HENRY ETAL J P HENRY 9725 NORTH SHORE DR HOUt^ HN 55369 38 07-117-23 32 0053 09675 NORTH SHORE DR T C CORBIN A J L HISFELDT TYLER C CORBIN 9685 NO SHORE DR HOUND HN 55369 38 07-117-23 32 0058 09705 NORTH SHORE DR R A CRANFORD A A C CRANFORD RODNEY A A ATtl C CRANFORD 9705 NORTH SHORE DR HOUND HN 55369 Vl. r) J. ..I I \ » ' •f* t • ■' i p f % • • I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATIO»J AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEMJEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF HY KN0HLE06E AND BELIEF. DA' .. r.. ifn' I L I / '’govVlot 2 < ’2 17 if .^V I6)> ^(15)> (10/(10)1 3 ^ r •••r rr>y PT 6# (57)1 >T or ^ rtO ? 0PJKAV (29)(26) ^ 7 1 Q (46) •Q (36) i 5 I 4«7 1 / A Tf (4:5) -'<1 3B NB3*36'f (27) 185 8 i y. 41 55 (75),., J -^3 \ ^ * I '(i*)/i 'T » SB ») tor 90 5 ( 26) TTrs • « * \(52) 9 1 A (25).(50 (18):2l0 (24) 9 (58) con 1 .:y I iS?S::sr (56),(53)'(52) 154' M t V » L i a. • \ (17) \l - y M; * 'A '* A'^ (60) ^(62)'*" - V % '^1 (12) .u«t / *\ -• - CITY 0^ ORCNO t <--m;s;r.-,^; : i^.-^ ,<:'f Variance Request Application Stephen & Joanie Ward - 4695 North Shore Drive 27 September 1991 Separate Pages (1 of 2). Description of Request Owner desires to build a Garage and additional needed living space attached to a small existing home on an existing steeply sloped lake lot. The existing garage was torn down ten years ago at the Informal request of both the City of Orono and Hennepin County Public Works because it encrcached on the Co. Rd. 19 right of way and because it's continued use posed a hazardous entrance on to Co. Rd. 19. The City of Orono Zoning Administrator, the Hennepin County Entrance Permits Coordinator and the Property Owner met at the site prior to the garage removal and brainstormed Ideas of how a useful garage could be built In the future and eliminate hazardous conditions. The Garage Plans that accompany this Variance Application reflect many of the ideas proposed during that site meeting. »' ; / f-‘ ; 1 Variance Request ADolication Stephen & Joanie Ward - 4675 North Shore Drive 27 September 1991 Separate Pages (2 of 2) Revised 10/06/91 Description of Hardships and Unusual Property Conditions. 1. Existing garage was removed in part due to the Citys request and Owner has beet ; ■^•f'^jt a garage for nearly ten years 2. Existing home sits on a steeply sloped lot and therefore was built high on the lot to mimimize the elevation difference between Co. Rd. 19 and the First Floor. Because of that existing condition, only minimal area is available between the existing house and the roadside setback requiring the garage to be attached to the house and built over a steep slope. 3. Because c.' the steeply sloped lot. the limited amount of available roadside building area, and the need to have the garage floor elevation nearly the same as Co. Rd. 19. the Garage floor elevation Is located above the roof eave of the existing house therefore requiring a substantially deep masonry foundation in order to avoid excessive ground pressure on the existing foundation wall. The above conditions require the new foundation to be built along side of the existing foundation and at the same depth below grade. Also, there exists an elevation difference between the existing house roof line and the proposed garage roof line. In order for the two roofs to complitment one another and to avoid an area of water, ice. and snow entrapment between the two structures, the two roofs are joined together in one plane. The condition of joining the two structures on a steep lot requires a unique structual. functional and asthetic solution . 4. Because of the excessive elevation difference between the proposed garage level and the House Entry, a series of stairs is required. In the past, without the shelter of an attached garage, the stairs have been exposed rendering them hazardous during inclement weather. The proposed Garage Plan locates a set of stairs within the proposed building envelope in order to eliminate hazardous conditions for the Owner and the public during inclement weather. 5. Because of the need to have the above stairs enclosed and still have a functional double garage, the stair enclosure adds to the footprint of the garage which would not be required on a level lot. 6. The existing deck system and the proposed wood stair system which water freely passes through contributes to a disproportionate amount of the calculated hardcover in propor ­ tion to the actual structural hardcover of the existing house and proposed garage addition. Note: The ground under the existing deck and wood stair system is highly permeable and should be considered when calculating the true impermeable hardcover area. 7. The vast majority of existing and proposed hardover lies from 180' - 255' from the lake not in the 75 -150' area. Considering the character of the lot. this is the most desirable location for hardcover and should be token into account when evaluating the actual Impact of the hardcover on this particular lot. £ HC 5329 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Permit No. 320 Washington Avenue Sojfth^ owfl •<****^ Hopkins, Minnesota 552^ ^ f APPLICATION FOR DRIVEWAY OR STREET ENTffA'WCE^RMIT \.dS^ I ^ (Read "General Requirements" reverse side) Na™ofappiicani Stephen i Joanle Ward____________________Ph„„, 612-472-1879 4695 North Shore Drive, Mound (Orono), Minnesota 55364 lcitv>(state)(2*p code) Name of Property Owner Stephen & Joanie Ward Address 4695 Nortt Shore Drive 55364 1. Cootraaor performing work Upward Bound Design & Construction, Inc. p^one 612-471-0723' 2. Application is hereby made for permission to construct and thereafter maintain: Driveway(s) F^lit«xStKde(|<) 3. Building to be constructed: W Yes c No Residence o Commercial (Specify Type) Garage 4. Driveway or street will be: □ Temporary 3 Permanent Date proposed entrance will he npprteri: Fxi i ng 5. Is the property: JOcPIatted O Unplatted Number of present driveways or entrances to property: ( 1 ) Onf? 6. Building Permit acquired: Qt Yes o No City Hrnnn Applied for Permit No. 7. Type of proposed entrance surface. J5 Bituminous □ Concrete o Rock C Other 8. Location North Shore Drive, Co. Rd. 19, Orono, Minnesota (Address) (Co. Road) (Ciryl 9. Location, if rural:ON Miles (N.,S., E.. or W.l Dared 25 September 1991 Applicant's Signature »r County Road 19 (Roao or Street) To help the Inspector, place a stake with a cloth attached in the center of the proposed entrance, higher than any surrounding vegetation. NOTE: Owner met with Dave Zetterstrom at site to discuss proposed garage placement APPLICANT'S DIAGRAM • (If plot or construaion plan is not submitted) aCCeSS to County Road 19. (Complot# this form and send all copies to: Hennepin County Highwvy Division. Traffic Office. 320 Wesliington Avenue South. Hopkins. Minnesota 55343. Phone: 935-3381. After approval, one copy will be returned to applicant.) ii&yfei J r HARDCOVER CALCL'UTIO'l KORKSHEi.T^icf'/'b 5 . f. ^ SET3AC:< ZC.'IS: (c;zcL£ o;i=) (o^ lz-lV.‘ 250-;CO' Existing Hardcovh?. in Zone n t\ %House LENGTH 3« Garage c. Driveway X D.. Sidewalk. E. Haiio/ •:. . cTDec^ F.Landscape ARE'S underlain BY . . PLASTIC ■ SHEETING G. Other 6-, 4-. ;< width :< X - :< - :< X X X X X - X _ X • • # ^0 Total Hardcover in Zone - - - • * •Total Prope.rtt Area in Zone - - - 2/^/ t X 100 ^ ^ ^ f • I — • : ' ' • ’• 'O » r I S.F. c trw (• • S • I* • •• ^ I S *»“ • •* ‘o • • ^ S t T* # _ S • r • S.F. o • S.F. 0 I r • - S # r • ll'S.F. _ SIF» S • F • /■2./__^ -S.F. S.F.Z8^l i A '>^26 mm • k 4 ^ . V \ i . - • , '■ rre/v/fA^ - pAf- « « • ‘ «« • • • • • •*»• tit HARDCOVER CALCL'LATIC.‘I KO;rp»! I • w«. * SST3AC:< ic:ic: (ciRcis c ;ie) 0-/5' (75-^ 250-3‘M J ’*' * M — 1 I •' • i (> O o « w ^ Existing H ap .dcqvs ?. in Zon - Y 5'^- 3 =7SS.S S.r. ■ WIDTH • Y ■*• . ■ ."S.P. • X _ _ = • . • # • • • • S.r. iff ••• X . = • S.r. • • X =S • r 1 • = . pASAf^^X =S. F. r. r^fVPWAY X =S.r. /3 a ^ ^ _ _ • X = • ....... ^/O s.F. ^ U/Cft^O n. SrnPWALK ‘X _ = • ^ • Uyff^>0 Ctt/S /7. ?X ^ ^/y- 8 s.F. »X =s.r. E. R atio / /^. s <C Zec :<_> --------- /i V /O. (f r //i. X ^.3 z Y /4, r /77. C = • .\3.t X tf • • ?. 1 AJ.’D'trAPP X - =.......................S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN AV X 4 # ... S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING • ^ ^ X = ♦ • • cSir# t» X = • • 1 • # • s.F. - ■ ' ■■■■■. ■ ■'"* « • • • • G. OtHP.P X • =S.F. V Total Hardcover Total Property A rea • IN Zone • /<T7/./ s.F. * IN Zone s.F.B /,T7/. / ^B X IQO /9/9Z % •i r.:. 7 /Appl•^^^f J “4.- -^9.52 % s » •«. • ’* 1 ^ • i*» • K6vi$eo lo/pe/e; P ~WA^ r I p -3 KARDCOy;?. CALCJlATiO.’l WCRKSHEZT 4*>e5' MO/lTh S£T3.ic:< ZONE: (circle cne ) 0-75' Iz-lz^y 250-50G' I PR dP p SGQ -ferisT-iTjg Haezcove - in Zone ;i«;+;' » • I fA. nCUSc ^3. .4-X 2 -3 .. = ISS. 6 LENGTH WIDTH X HcW 2-3 35 B, Garage X c. Driveway 5 3 1 D /5* WooO D. Sidewalk 23>X 4 ___/ 4- X 4 E. g*j>°/Ei2aLi^^6^:zr B X __^ tCrAmmGv^LC F. LANDSCAPE AREAS UNDERLAIN BY , ___________ PLASTIC SHEETING ■■ >(/l G. O ther Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone w I . I i I i. r • i i . r i • r • 555 55 56 4,A£>. 5 6S5 s/o.so • • . I 2$.II c r • • S • r • t • S.F. S • r > s.r • 41 S.F. 11] £^£2J2.~s.f. [& [T]^.52iLdL-r[I]_^l£^ X 100 > 3S: ^ ' crr.'C' C‘CN3 _ riT'*^^r31 'AjJliilL£l^U^o^U reef 1 8 1991 Edmund W, F, Rydell 135 Orono Orchard Road N, Long Lake, MN 55356 October 17, 1991 Orono Planning Commission Chairman and Members City of Orono P, O, BOx 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Chairman and Members, I have expressed my opposition to the development of the sewer property land which is aacross the street from my residence on many occasions. However, I came to realize that requiring Long Lake to accept the zoning requirements which all the rest of us are bound by would be the best solution we could get, and I reluctantly accepted this concept. It was my understanding that in order to comply with the two acre require ment, they would be able to get a maximum of 13 lots on the property. I am now advised that when the actual application. No, 1691, is up for approval, Long Lake wants the 13 lots but to do so they will have to violate theZ acre requirement; therefore they are requesting re'oning to one acreR-lA, I am strongly opposed to this. They should be held to the 2 acre requirement, and that should determine how many lots they can get. Dear members, I own 38 acres just across the street from the sew-er property. At some point I or my heirs may want to subdivide. I have always appreciated our 2 acre requirement and been bound by it in my planning. Because of a large amount of wetlands, I can only get about 6 or 7 lots out of my property. I love our open spaces concept and have never regretted this constraint. However, if Long LaKC is permitted to rezone to one acre, there is no valid reason why I and others should not be permitted to do so. The value of my land would be almost double if this were permitted. There is no reason why Long Lake should be treated any differently than an individual. It seems to me if we make an exception in this case, we are opening a Pandora's box of problems. I don’t think I would want to, but there are no doubt many landowners who would like to double their money on their land. They may bring lawsuits. The argument that an individual should be afforded the same treatment as any other type of legal owner may be powerful. We may be precipitating the ultimate downfall of our whole 2 acre concept if this 1 acre rezoning is granted. Even if we prevail, we may be sii^ected to long and expensive lawsuits which we can ill afford. I strongly urge that you reject the proposed 1 acre rezoning of the sewer plant land. Sincerely, Cj!—Q ^ irmiiMn'M-*--------- --------.■TiaiU'yriiiiiri'MWr'i'ir —-------------*---- 8v: p; r.-? Greg and Dana Kellenberger 105 Orono Orchard Road Long Lake, MN 55356 TO: City of Orono Planning Commission Application #1691 - The City of Long Lake ’s comprehensive land use application for a 13 lot residential subdivision of the property located at 130 Orono Orchard Road. Members of the Planning Commission: We are writing this letter in lieu of attending the meeting scheduled for October 21st because we will be out of town on that date. After reviewing the plans on site with Jeanne Mabusth and David Squire on October 15,1991, and then again at the Orono City offices on October 17,1991; we would like to make the following comments: 1) Overall site plan: We are happy to see that the three most important features of the site - the pond, the stand of mature spruce, and the large hill • are being preserved. These features give the site its unique character and should therefore be saved and accentuated. 2) Road alignment: In general, it makes sense to follow the existing gravel road because it helps preserve the features mentioned above. That alignment gives good access to the land to the north of the railroad tracks and minimizes construction in the sensitive areas of the site, however; the intersection with Orono Orchard Road is less than desirable. The plan shows this proposed intersection in a direct line of sight with our house. That means that the headlights of any cars traveling out of this neighborhood at night will shine directly into the windows of our living and family rooms. This proposed intersection also duplicates the one immediately to the south. A better solution would be to curve the proposed road to the south from the edge of the pond and align it to intersect with Orono Oaks Road. This would provide a better entrance to the project (by creating a view toward the pond as you drive in) and eliminate an additional entry onto Orono Orchard Road. \ r 3) Project density and lot size: At first glance. 13 - one acre lots seems to be an acceptable solution compared to the previous plans that we ’ve seen (i.e. leveling off the hill and filling in the pond); however, a closer look warrants these comments: a) To build the two houses in the positions shown on the east side of Orono Orchard Road across from Orchard Drive would certainly have an adverse effect on the stream and lowlands included in these lots. Even one house would be questionable on this site due to the size of the existing knoll it would be built on and because of the driveway alignment to Orono Orchard Road. b) Two questions: Does the 2 • acre minimum lot size apply to this parcel of land? If so, would we be setting a (negative) precedent for future developments in Orono by allowing these smaller lot sizes. Additional comments and questions: a) Lots of people walk and bike along Orono Orchard Road on their way to the Luce Line Bike Trail. The sharp corner in Orono Orchard Road (where it crosses the stream) is a particularly dangerous meeting place for pedestrians and automobiles. This could be changed by adding a pathway along the east side of Orono Orchard Road beginning at Orono Oaks Drive and continuing north to Orchard Circle (or further to Bollum Lane). The stream could be crossed with a bridge (on the inside corner of the curve) to create a pleasing and safe link to the Luce Line. b) It's my understanding that the proposed road widths in this development are 30 feet curb to curb. These road widths are excessive because very few cars are parked on ine street due to the driveway lengths encouraged by a 35’ setback. I would urge you to recommend narrower street widths (approx. 24 ’) to help preserve more land. c) What Is the size of the acreage (and potential developed density) to the north of the Burlington Railroad that will be accessed by this development? d) I’ve left this comment for last because I’m almost afraid to mention it. But what the heck? I find it amazing that the City of Long Lake Is proposing this development and the south by-pass route for Highway 12 in the same breath. Who would be motivated to buy a house in this development 'viih a freeway or expressway in their backyards? Thankyou all for reading this somewhat longwinded letter. I want you to know that we are not against a residential development on this site - we request only that It be done In a manner consistent with Orono ’s high standards. We urge the members of the planning commission to table this project until It complies with those standards. Sincerely, I _________ . . .J rchard >oM iiortii It of CoMonlty KoBoganfit Flu 3. I1(«S TboMo t AUco (tnek tod John M. boor, 4149/43C5 north Shorn DriooShorn Subdivision of Lot Lino Soarrasssnont to MoratoriM Otdlnanea So. Ff> Saeond ICO prior to or Tarlan CoMiaaion aro aakad to worm to tho Chanbara shaa thair appllcati lea raqnaats bafora tba tba podlnn at tba front of atioa ia aaaooaead by tba iriaeina Sricklay. 1343 Sorth Shor - Continuation of Public Saarinp • 14S3 Sobart F. Soaaa, 3S»0 Satartovn Road - Praliainary lubdiviaion/Claas III - Continuation of PnbUe Saarlnq IlSSS Jla Suranan, 1SS9 Sroan toad soath - Appaals - Public Saarlng flfS* Tarry Sadlar, 13»S Saldnr Park Road - Varlanoas - Public Saarlnq • ISSe MlUan Poqua, HSl Paqaniaas Point Road - Appaals - Public Baarlnq Tarlanea t Public Saarlnf Sketch Plan Rariaw - Sot an Action Itan So. M, Saoond Sorias • • 1SP4 Douqlaa Sara, 31PS Sbtartoan Road - Varlanca - Public Saarlnq Planning Caanlaalua Cm 14. Report by Plannlnq Coaualssloa rapraaantatl*a to Couoela naatinq of October 14. 19P1. 15. Status raport by Lake Oaa Coaailttae rspraasntatlyas. If. Status raport by Pacilitlas Coaaattaa repraaantatlTaa. IT. OtlMr Isauas. Additional Itana - IS. Plannlnq Coanlasloa approval of aloatas of tba Saptanbar IS. ItSl aaatlnq. It. Plannlnq Conoisaion to aalact a rapraaantatlva to attend r 13, Ittl Council w -:r ■' --4 :;^a ^ - ■: .P w ----------------WETLAkJD LIMITS li^i> DETERMIMED 9/|S«/90 © 6POT EL&VATIOKJ^ 941.^5 Designed: txjt> Drawn: DJi? M012TW O 25 50 lOO 200 PT. L/I •wn; — <L^%J Dale: 9/ie/9l MFRA No : 70 a 5 McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 15050 23rd Ave. N. Plymouth. MN 55447 612/476-6010 Engineers Planners Surveyors WETLAND LIMITS, ORCHARD POND ADD. ORONO, MINKiE60TA I*:.iii.o mry--SK PI- ' ■>■'-''-V 1 ' ■ _ '■■ '■'. ;/ ;.^; ;;■■/ ;-■./V-- :.|;;a ;/ • < •; • ■)['-' ■S ■‘"4rr;V^*r.•'V;'^ •-' ■/'A|,i, PROP E-KTY DEfedRIPTION BiXK ihjrt nnln« i Qov-r«i^i t^l rh^r, «H,.hrty rm Mid line «o . point W8.U foot n-V -h«ln’) “Jrtl. of rh. comr «f Mid GovmMnt «>ii 2. .dileH Mint !• *-h« int«rMCtlrift of thir jouthorly ri«tit-or-w*r llf*« of ■n>' rnilmM -Uh ..M M«t Unn: lh..,c. •Ml.rly .Ion, ..Id M.-iO-Tly nitht'«<r-.n um 496.1.2 r^t (7.92 < south lin« of B.td Oi»v*f-nMnt U»t 2 i t‘* swahuMt cortwr th«r*»of: tNme. «uc >-<n t.id .out *outh«..t corner ih«f«»ri th«mc* north on th. .n.t lift Ul 2 to It* IninrMCtloo wtU. th. north.rly rUhl-uf-u.r r.llrt>«l: thonc. -..Mrly .Ion, t.ld itcrltwrly rljM-of-ui of ..Id OovormMnk » *omh.rly rl,ht*of'.f-My I t.ld Oc Cr«Mncln, .t th. int.rMctiw of th. »outh.rly lh« Borllf^ton »orlh.rn B.tlrowl uiih llui m*1 I Lot 2: titMt;. ...t.fly .Ion, Mid wmlhorly rlght-of-My lift. . dl.l.h.:e of 71^ r«tt to th. point of b.,lnnin, of th. property tflftf detcrllwdi thence CTnUnujn, .ut.rly .Ion, ..id .outherly ri,ht.of-My lift. . dUt««. of 14^ f..t: .lutnc d.fl.rtlt^ right 90 deer... . di«t«ic. of IM fMl; Ihenc. deflecUn, rir»t tetlnnln,. ' OovomMiit Lot 2, 9Mtlon 35. ToMUhlp ll8. i point of 23. dMcrlbpd M Boflnnln, .i . point on ih. South tin. of ..id Oov«mMnt Lot 317-A2 f*.t FMt of tb. SouthMit eom.r thorMf: th«tc. EMt South lift. IhJ.C'O fMi: thMK. deflMlmg left 2*t4.50 f«it on If MtmdM uoutd int.reiKt th. toulherly right*of-».f lliv Ehirlington Northern lUllro*! (forMrly th. Or..t Korlhein 1 St. P.ul. «lnn..polls wwi Hwtitoh. R.tlrowl) .i . dlttnnc. M.t.rly, Muurwl .lon« Mid rlcht>of>«.y tine fra Covemwoit lot 2; theoc. *r>uthu.«t.rly to th. point 2 dietuit .Ion, Mid . 1 in. which Alt thM pMl Tenrahlp tt«. B.,l> S/JUi: ’ tlM SoUtlMMt Quu-t.r of th. Southwe.l Qu.r(»r of S^teilon 35. itR Oounly. PtwnTOM. dMcrlbed u foLtoM: line (SouthwMt Quvt.r of th. ithwext Ounrler di.tiint 953 feet north of the *outh«Mt comer of .aid Southwest Quarter ff tlx Sout.'iwe.t Quirter; thence north to th. rtorthesat corner of *.t<J Southwest Ouert.r of the Southwest Quarter: thence w.et to the northwest corner of said Southwest (JuMter of th. South-..! Quwl.r: thwic. south .ion, the west line of s.l<f Southwest barter of the Southwest Quarter I .ion, the o • point 883. r»iU»we*l Quarter of aicn, the centerline to a poin Intel sect mi.8 fe (!].)« ch..n.) north of th. mtilhi»..t . e Southwest Quarter; thence so<j'.heasieri Oreno Orchard Rout (foTMrly known u Orono Roicentei point 836 fMt northweatn-ly alun, atld t line nf a.ld SectliMi 35: thme. northewtarly «>ITE IhUMMAgy f MOTC4. dkRK.dk OKjOh*0 Ott.CUAJK,0 R& ROW EX4BPTIOM MKT ARB A Z9 0- -9-» »^8L.------------ UIME - PROMT SB* «siCaK lO’ 4 RKAR- »0' ■ VQHKM AOJACKMT TO ATRBE.T ALU DlHBM^lOMfe ARE is^UfeO OMUV UOT ^V/ERA6eE TOTAl_ iOMRiMKO POOTPRlMT OF Ai.|_ PRlM4lPUfi 4 A4^.6 5%ORT WRUCTUREt» BMAU. MOT RXCBKD »«*% OP UOT ARKA MUMRER OP UOTB - IR WOT WtCTTM AT toBTEiACvC - i40* MlMlMUM UTILITY i pgAlKUk^hE EASE.MEMT& ^ 1 •t- — iT-'L---------J i f •*7RE«7 ROW UiME KAIMl^ IN WtDTU LlNBt» 07 vw 1-b.b. , AMC> IO‘ IM WIOTM 4 At^JOJNJlM6r BTREtT RI^HT'OF-WAT WU4& S PBRIMETAC OF at UMWKdftW OTUfeRWlfefc iMOlCATBD NOKTM 400 PCCT OuA McComb* hwili .oo« Amoc Mm. Inc.PRELIMI.NACY PLAT 1*. 100'PKEtPARCCS POe OJ4»15090 H tn9inMr«094UACD POND ADDITIOM oeoNO, mikjkjc &ota dITY OF LOW6* LAI4U V 'RymouB MNS&ddT 612 476 6010 F5A>n«r% Sury«yor«70®5 MIkIKJESOTA mm m. # 90' S ttf 19* ro w 19'lO’ j 7 oT.1 7 0% ?....... COhiL. f i0UTr —- IV SIT WCAR COtMi,m. - Mw DOT Ml Typ» 4( • r S<T SA6C - MM tXJT tSSI TTP6 41 UHA \ ^oy---tlgfl >r/yM - A^RC>VtP TYPICAL STg£ET ^£^lTlOKJ M T«» LCC^EMD -^9^0-------- &KIPTIW6. COMTOUR (^900) ^Roeo^eo 4 c»SAvDfi^ [9^0! POTtMTIAU BCCXtf PAP w/t*AR BUBV ^ - plRBATIOM OP 4URPAAK PRA»0A<»C KIOTGL^ I EXI4>TiM<si C>RA»MA4»a PATTBSMfe TP TMft BA^T 4 bUAUl. MOT frS. IMCRS.A9 IN AREA oe vtL.OAi “ry i A64CPTBD teOPlOM 40MTROU TE^UWIQUl AUAUt- SB &HPuOYfcCi OUR»IO<» £ APT»R COW*»TRUCTlOM (UN"^II- Va4»tTATIO*J Ife RBfefiyrAe»4.lt>UC£>) P&TAlU S AN APPAOVBP ^ptMBN-T CPNTROL 4#f£*TfeM i»WAUk_ &t UPCP D uring * 4 APTtR 60KI^Ti XO MITIC^AXB B P i*4Auk_ e* U*»BP D uring * f XO MITIC^AXB ^^BPIMBUT • ..w—-- --------- XWB PONP abba »siXO uOMto 1-A4^ CRBB4. FABRIC ^ (Mi«AC i-KNVI«0 FEN66 «------^ or AP»*ec>v6p 6i3uAl_> BCKJd.MMA.gUlS OF 4-lFT AXATIOM APR. E.MTt ZaO t-iNDBWOOP LANS £eO^IONJ 60MTgQl- P£K1CE DETAIL i,CA[ Cr r-i'-o' MOeTM o 90 ‘OO 700 400 CCCT wsi mo DJ«>u*io(rM« o>*fCTturf*«o TM*t > tm « oui« mMum • 0 gMM« rM« UM»a» tm tt*ttO» ■•wMtota i -A ft 1 f\ ■tcCowiSB ftfifc ^oo» A mocII—, IBC.PREUMINARV fcPADINtj f DPAINAOE PLAN r- IC •66iT“ )0’ TOi~ PBtP/.REC3 POe S DJ A __________________1S0S0 ?M am N Cng»Mr«d?R4WARD POND ADDITION!-M 54 dITV Of LONG LAliC ■ftMMKS MviSKmS 4/9- CC ‘^/\‘>f*l\ —. VOlOli.ei2/47fi-6010 SurvvvoM OBONO, MIKJKJ6SOTA i.ilSo---------- 7069 MINNESOTA 4 l^v -.vw I L&^EMD ---------W—— C)04»TlhM» WAXCRMAIM M— BKI^*riKJ<9 MYDR^T 4 ^ATG k VA1.V& -----«----------^>_ BXI*»TIM(» 4>AK11TARV ^tWBK ----------------------- BK1^TIM(^ HAMUOUe. --------PH---------BXI*^IWU POKCB MAIU ---------W ....... pROPOfetO VWkXBRMAlKJ ^ PROPO^CC? MYORAWT proposed 5AMiTARY «»BWG«R HfV PROPO^BP HAMM^1.C w/jMVBRT »>« PRC7PO^CC> ^TORM &BWB.R, PBOPot>B.C> 4AT^U — — ^--------- DCN<7Tla& MAIM --------UfaT ------- PBMOTB^ UMPB.R<pROUMP TfcCBPMOWB bd Moerw O 40 lOO 100 AOO CB6T OJA jHOt m «* »aiCT tkPIMvrMM MO Twkf. mi * dul < • ii> MoifMioiA^ i«io<af<a «M»a tmi umm w t«« tt*Ti o«{A PKELIMlKiAKY UTILITIES PLAW i“- lOO'pieBPAizcD Poe SwttT 4- D J ^ MOMO OP4MARD POND ADDITIOKI fMl 1 lk.1 A 1 & AA B6i 'PS5T 'dITY OP LOKJG LAklE---------, M 1 ,.,. ‘\\-il'<,\ ___uiiou fiinar —MIKIMESOTA A. •Iv.lON* 61? 474-60^0 Burioyon c/ic Ly N w p rn in aj te o l«/ i aa 706A wmmm PftOPOSEO LOT DIVMtON FOR THOMAS A ALICE STUCK. JOHN BAUER. AND DICK A LORRAINE BENSON IN LOTS 5-8. BLOCK L8. SAGA HILL REVISED. HENNEPIN CO MNNN. tf- C. ^ EXISTING LBOAL PESCRTPTfONS A. Th« North 12*1 f«««t of the Ne»t half of l4)t^.i, a«d the Beat half of Lot Block IB, *Saqa HIU Revised, Hen­ nepin Co Ninn.". R. Lota 7, 8 and the Best half of i4)t A| Ai.fin that pert uf the Meat half of U>t 6 lying .Soiith of the Ncrth 12'i feet thereof, (Uock IB, “Saqa Hi M Rnviaed, Br'rinepin i!o Hi nn. " . PBOPOBEO DtVIBIOW t |)srt of S, Block 18, in Co Ninn.” described as f Northeast mrnar of aaid L Baqe Hill fteviaed. Hen- IIowm: *le9innLn4 et •rly : .AO feet I thence Bsnterly psrallel with the 'kirth- line of :»atd Lot 6 s distenc# of 16.81 ^eet; Northerly to a pom*, on * ha N<ir*herl¥ tine of ■ia:d lx>t 6 diiiant 47,00 ''•at Kasteriy of North- i^st corner oi Lot 6; thence Ne^itetly aiong said Nrr*^herly I4n* to the |K,mt of heginning. EXCBPT the North 1feet of the Meat half o( said t.ot 6. nWCRIPTlPHS ArW^OmBlOH D. The Bast halt of Lot A, Block 18. "Saqa Hill Revised, Beg corner of said l.ot 6r thence 8< Mesterly line of said iqa Hill Kevisee, tot 6, said Block mg at the Noithwest herly along the diHtance of I3H.AC feet} thence Featerlv parallel with the Northci ly im« of Htid Lot fi a distance of 16.81 fart] thenja Northerly *•» a ;-oitit on the Nottherly 1 n»- nf fi.in1 l.>» 5 distant 47.00 feet Easterly of said Mot *hwest cor let of Lot 6; • htjnce Weaterlv along said Northerly Imr o the point nf heqrnninq. i.«it. 6, 7, and '•epi a« follows: BliM'k IB, “Snia Hill Revin*. Co Minn.*, EXCEPT that |>art of %aid Lot tnq at ' thence ’Southerly sic Peqinni Bed, il* n- ot 6 teacribeU the Hnrthw*'At corner t-f said long thi» Nf'MiTly line ef said 6 a distance of lli.SO fewi ; thenri- Bnstwrly |ierslL«!l with the Merth«>rlv line «»l said Lot 6 a dtstanee of J4.»t feet; then-# N«»»thril.- *- .i iSMnt on •-tc North, rly I i nr of said Lot 6 liHtant 4 '. do Ea«*frly of '.aid H«.:rth- west corner ol Lot 4; ihance Wasterlv along said North- •r«y line te the po&nt of beginninf. This survey shr»w . ^t«f.eity. aid the does not pwfport croechaents. h.. ....................... ft nl .11 l.uiMitWN ll»r»oiu It show any other isqnoveiMnta ei en' d Of /f n eRNe'sfO*. •r/c^ sg ^ t Iron .sark i found (, j irrn earker set Bearings showi are bMBd upon CITY OP OBOMn ^ 1 - 9 5 , Mayor , Clerk Com\ & (.KONBIRG, INC. I.. e 111 r• « ..... j-»»i .If.,* I" 'n. it ;r t • ""v ififti I KUfWf itw •>* ih. M4«. ^ Minnr-*. •*.♦ M <tl S I 111 i*»« I • > i! • SuS»K • I. ■ 1#’hi g I I ■J «*r«‘-pf¥s " m ji ‘ ■#:, W i p<! ^ = -M s:JiM Wfeb.':mm te /:^'juntos :'$ y!s:" ■-M mm,y. I I ( I ' "^ 3 -j f-1-^- :;’S».. : ■■■:■, ^ ■/ ■■■;/: ■' 1 \'A :;;'v; r c.V'-^: yV f 'j': ^^■■^■■■•vy-', ; ■''''v'y-, 'i ., '' y- '■■:■' ■• ■■; '■■' .;• ■' ' i' " .•.:: J . •■■^' ■ * -y;.: - 4 j;; r -St "I ■...a W -^‘U &: : • V m >•■ ir ■'1 m m V .; , .; ,« I I '"0I r T' Stt fffh B- BU E \w j—L==-----------p1—1L 2 -RTOM- ^*>*ouJve«. 4,A^1 i'l’ tmiHm-’- O m M» . B ^ o • •o . 06. “ e^rAHi:7£p ^ \ -x t ruAtt l■'so• i t ; x..^ "N; ,v*iai -4 1 ■M o ■ Mo ^ fS .• o • m ■o . «- OS “ •m ‘ *^l-,-’.:t . ■ •■ ..■■ ■■■ ■. ■■ ■■■■:•■ WS:\Xv: r \. \ '< ■■ >,»'.•y-'V-'f'-'vli-P' m. ■ V IP:/::^:-^5. ' ‘V; Tlk?C I • r ■ '■ ^'-i :ali': I •“"^ tAOtl% -nEMT PiJVA» y —^ r«>P«rti fiAf^ I \ - lire;. •% . ■ :;■ ■-%. .ws^m ^................. ( ) M«<i»(/a.r corn».r '*57' A ■ t '. -U t •* 5 .1 > ' //<)MS<> , '201^^ * 1^'' »|'7T ” = /i/3' • '* ’ ,.,y>'^ 2 ( ---- I 75'2 ’SO' fefSLAH. A 3'^^^-^oiU + •yfto )( fno^e c^6l> , 2C>^''- • «r»t»ti.»-c ter. OF t s«\/->«/t Desc:i2.Je7~/oA) Ihat part of Govemtrent Lot 1, Section 8, Township llTNorth, Ran9e 23, West . of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described us follcwsi Beginning at meander comer No. 57 on the South side of Maxwell Bay in the East line of said Section 8; thence Scuth on the East llxw of said Section 8, 376.35 feet) thence due West at right angles 455.3 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract to be described) thence oontinuing due West 68 feet) thence due North 140.7 feet more or less to the Southerly shore of Maxv/ell Bay) thence Northeasterly along the Southerly shore of Maxw^l Bay to a point in a line dravn due North fran the actual point of beginning) thence due South 183.7 feet more or less to the actual point of beginning. For the purpose of this description the East line of said Section 8 is oonsldered to be a due North and South line. Together with an easement for driveway purposes over that peurt of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follcws) Beginning at )neander comer No. 57 on the South side of Maxwell Bay in the East line of said Section 8) thence South along the East line of said Section 8, 376.35 feet) thence due West at right angles 447.8 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract to be described) thence due South 82.05 feet) thence South 11 degrees, 47 tsinutes West 218.55 feet) thence South 12 degrees, 37 minutes East 71 feet more or less to a point in the Northerly right of way line of County Road No. 51) thence Southwesterly along said Northerly right of way line 15.1 feet) thence North 12 degrees, 37 minutes West 73.85 feet) thence North 11 degrees, 47 minutes East 218.85 feet) thence due North 82.05 feet more or less to a point in a line drawn due West from the actual point of beginning) thence due East 15 feet to the actual point of beginning. For the purpose of this description tlte East line of said Section 8 is considered to be a due North and South line. □ « WOOD STAKE PLACED B.M, - BEARINQS ON ASSUMED DATUM O - IRON MON. SET ■ IRON MON. INPLACE PRC POSED INFORMATION --------------HI FLOOR ELEV. .BASEMENT ELEV. GARAGE FLOOR ELEV. TOP BLOCK ELEV.■—I wr-.wi-.vn.ie I i.wa.v. -- I \Jr DLUV^IS CLtV. • DRAINAGE 000.0 ■ EXIST. ELEV. (000.0j> PROPOSED ELEV. ^ o " EXIST. & PROP. ELEV. SCHODORG ^ND SUnVEYINQ INC. 1 hereby certlly Ihat this plan, survey or reporl was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws ol the Stale ol Minnesota. _ JOBS 3 Book - Page 20- 30 Date: AM6^JZ3~1331______ Rogisirallon No. 14700 Scale )"=50' Cy/d/S ORONO'S ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS ■■ MAJOR ARTERIAL lllllllll INTERMEDIATE ARTERIAL -— minor arterial """•• collector SCENIC PARK'JAY City of Orono, sVlinnesota ■'■‘wj: -:r\ ■ ■ r. '*■ r- ., ' 1 ■' ■ K' “ ■v*ims iiU. m A /6ve-^/ I ..;■ m gncMTW. n- W.i o^^<* SI. IkMiDI# «« MwflK««»•• ts WMt •!Mk JMiiikiH alUMlMlkMklOMfta il *«»< iUWUt •Me* i«( tasi aniw Waal Omtfitt •MUwaal OMTte* •! IM SmIIwm| Om^ •* *« 0»^lw •! tiM Swlte^ Ouartor . T ; '^ ; f ■ <:•■'. ■ •I UM ImiMmwI Our1«f • H .4 nrr r TMa aw*«r Wl tfiiririTi-ifnr •f s PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR > y<A , ;•;• ROBERT F. SUE$S f: - IM THE SE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 33-tiaf; ^^xJcuucpiM r.nilNTY. MINNESOTAUWIB" CAU r*fco' OATH a ij*^ tiHEETNO. ■ r m ^ERfipjCATE 4»»Wj* SURVE'iFOR BOB -SUS/IN BILGfR ■line to a point'In Blon *'°*^,'***l*nt 20 f2et**Horhh*'^"'^‘’^ ‘.Blonfl said line fr«*i Zu "°'^l*”'e8terlv mea. ••■terly of a etraloL °f Lot 3 lot. Which line^eiiSS Mne Of -aid lot S JSdt ^he n northweatir^^fro«^Ka ‘'iJ•^""*^ 2l!e'*feet^'’‘'to the easterly f^aht angUa thende oonfclnuei' iS"thf 2!^“ ^ and I to the 8outherl»>'ilni"^.*""® "iifectlon Hlghwood, Uht MinK^?:®' lot. In to -the Pl.t JSitiS-;;";?' -ccordinj" record',In the of ot Tlbiee ‘. i-V-'i: V;- begl * 1 8a no ■ ' f . .V. •County, ft.«0.397 ac •’ll.•! ' . -•73.250 n^aVt- 'i"6o’v’ 5. 9; ' ‘ ' L oWSt ^?^5J„ '‘■OVATIONS TOP OF roUNOATlON mHu^ms cno*Moao -•WCTONwa.MNNMOTa .A934S HOOK 8 PAGE 31 l-HOJECT no: .312390 HPV/IOir\kin SHEET "" SCALE; / tu"""; .«■., DATE 7.y-?| ^ I : Certlff'ste of Survey for Jam ^ Buranen Jr. in Gov't. Lot 6, Section 10-117-23 Hennepin County, Minnesota A^n’n '¥}''«/ s//-»8 //•r V/>e M^r0f A4 V<f cm f 40 my CM0/rmr9*»» 00 0/ em^y. 0f00^ «v»# 97 vr ' " ~7vtr~/f y'n.o0 Legal Description That part of Government Lot 6, Section 10, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as be­ ginning at a point on the East line of said Government Lot 6 distant 7.78 chains(513.48 feet) South of the Northeast corner of said Government Lot 6; thence West 312.00 feet; thence South 111.54 feet; thence East 312.00 feet; thence North 111.54 feet to the point of beginning. Date : 8-9-90 Scale: 1" ■ 30' a ; Iron marker found Bearings shown are to an assumed datum. This survey shows the location of an existing house and a proposed addition in relation to the boundaries of the described property, as previously staked by others. It may be necessary to judicially determine the boundaries because of differences regarding the location of the northeast cor- of Government Lot 6. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly regist­ ered land surveyor under the laws of the State nf Minn­ esota . COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. Hark "5. ur^oerg Mn .___ ., lironoerg Mn. cic. no. TZ/ys Engineers, Land Surveyors, Planners Long Lake, Minnesota .-UK-.-*' S ' ,5ss„, i > fv « ^ l/t %A w 5i.;-“'> ■ ■' ■’ W ,#■:., Leqal Description distant 7.78 cnainsja thonre West 312 00 feet; thence South?;,’ii%s;'”;"UiSu ’3!STo%:n‘ ?«"”. «-ts -.t.s. to the point of beginning. Date ; 8-9-90 Scale: 1* ■ 30Iron marker found r, si::%:rnt‘u't’s:^i;%S2i iiiniiin ?. s»..=t-r improvements or encroachments. ered land surveyor under the laws of tne atate u esota. COFFIN S GRONBERG. INC. Mark b.' Gronberg mn. li Bearings shown are to an assumed datum.Engineers, Long Lake, Lie. Land Surveyors Minnesota "RoT TZTbS . Planners KS. ' r I • ,ii ii ‘iiii'vfiy »<)' M. ..I'llft •>» t.«il M>. (l.)Miii t',iik f;«nn,iv. Ml urn*sol .1 13% Au, MINNETONKA #1C91 ' lt(!-ehy certify that this is a true aii«t correct representation of the boundaries of l.ot 16, Baldur Park. Hennepin loiini.y, Ninnesotii. and the locatioi of any existing buildinys thereon. I does not purport to shun any oMtPi- liiproveiiients or encroach- •IKMll* . i;HfMH B GHUNlIHRi;. | MC . No ITriS —^ l.no Lanil Surweyor s ‘ and l•i .|n• . tJ' ip i.ike. tllnnesota I” . 20' Hale A '/.i H9, II Iron m.irki.r Ha turn Hean sea level - ffy- - -FxisMny contour C-MI.O)Spot elevation baldur park road WwS?'®’ mm ' <,4'^ .#■'# "4^•4 *• arwa fifit of ^ i s«c i-int^ :. A, -i/^i-J j :-/i - - -'• SKETCH PLAN FOR ALBERT D. HANSER IN SECTIONS 2 & 3-117-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA ' > / ! ATy^l '// rjKLf.K “ ,/v v/ AA,, A'feT// . / '! i..^-Uv-\ x'* I. 7%\'— «• -- ji-: W> ,1 tw *iMr <4 lAnnra* ' 'A * ■ COm\ xVi (,KO\HI K(, si;Hyf.rED, k’rrh , R»nif*^ ^1 m*'%* t h*‘ tkiath«*«»t < in Sf>otior I. Sth Principal Th«* Kast half of • h* Sou'tw-agt \/aar<#»r ••it<7ep* I h«» Wont M| fr«»* t'w.'roftf Town .nip U7 Wc' Mi.r-"- ThAt part of GoveinfM«nt i.Mt 4, ,-t. .-Mon i, Townsf..! ?; Noir-, Ram|>‘ 75 of »M. 'Hi Pi . •..; i ,., 1 N..,,dinn. desc-ribod an follows: 5U(|innin<| .«♦ f h» fkiMhwrn* .*■ i n**? of .vnid Govorniaent U^t 4; thenc«- Eas * ,*l..ru| t Nur h 1 im* of -i.iiti Ixjt ^ dintnm-e of 494 St.j»4irr ! >, dotlr.'tinii to the ri«|ht He dcw)ro#-« a dietmcr of H*.».9 faet ; thencf Baat*»lv, d<>f l«*rt irw^ to »hr RH dratore OS winutea a diat.anc*- ul K'S.*4 frt*t * ♦h»»f>»'r Snoth^rfiy^ 4<fl*Ltind t{, the riaht HR d0<jr>'>i* us ninitrfi a dia*4(H;r thar.«:»* Rout tiwi-^t •■! I . , deflri'tthq to th*' riRht ................ t Hvt.»n*' •* •♦«.■ tr=.-no- !.»iM ant.fl I, , tafl*(-fin.» th. -ft, .|..<4ratn u« amutrn t tir HOf > hWt' it .•! ! . r KI’O ? w«> imr (f *h.- Of. it Worth.fr Hnttw?' ua«ot 4 kaij, ini'.i: »h. futr r»»? naM rt^ht *.f-wa> inn to • n* S*i-jV> Jin« JKiVfi niarf.* lot 4; • hrn-v W»-*r «lon*4 ati.l .04.n lin. to tfH* Wr.t Itn.' of -aid Govrrnetttnt \.<j* 4; than.^ North alfitq aaid W-at, l»nr lo thw point of br<|tnninq. 4« f !• inw to of 7i.4 ‘.T d* Railway w*»a» . f 1 d^r.o SKETCH PLAN FOR ALBERT D. HANSER IN SECTIONS 2 A 3-117-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA f?nrvpy . Ward o( l.ot. ?, nlork 1, TRISTANA COVE llr-nnr'nin County^ MinnoBOta & l.onal noser ipt ion I.ot 2, Block 1, Tri.st.nna Cove Thin Rurvey shows the location of all GKiStine huildinos and visible “hard­ cover, and n proposed addition in re­ lation to tlic boiindnrioE of the above described property. Tt does not pur­ port to .show any other improvements or ericronchncnt.s. o ! Tron marker set • : Iron marker found Cxistinq elevation n.Ttnm: Mean Sen I.evcl Bearinns shown are to an n.ssnmed datum. CoffiN & Gronberg, Inc. ^ fjm.tr.yk Aivnui- ♦ lt*Oi ■ *i:-4T1-4141 I hereby rerlify that this suivey was propareil by me nr under my direct super­ vision, and that I am a duly registetol Civil Engineer and Lind Siirs’eyor under the laws of the State of Minnesola. ^_________________ Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota Licenv Numk-r 127,sS DATE SCAL£/"•Zo' lOBSJO Sk'.^-.m.^ P.L-^4—■ wax. ■•'ll . 1 ?■ fr- ||l)8if OII2Jt«BdlifUl At ^iflWIBriB -R. S \ii5?- L lo'-<» .- f 4>crBJ>c.< r PL 4?5I-imiLht ^ iPANiE ^ Mn<TH ^7tW WAi^D HOME. ^.IVE.rMm>. MM 9^j64 4‘ i<‘ 9S/^^/^» I *»w^-,io •*-- ic*J PKpl^EP ^^EMf PlANl FP-1 Exi»r II . ■ ,.t--t< K.'i^rr '‘"‘tt v:k^_. V-'l.,, ^ .-■•..{J:l 'w* ^ •- • • • .' ■' ll!!!!Kj!ill ii iiiiiii FIR^r FLPOK PIAH y^‘ .-^T==-rr- 1-0 KtMOVE Bust (fcTiPNi^ ^r. Nfi^.HBc'f?) t I »'-9'- 05 «X> l5 Kiwr Cf 4 <ic> rD 15 I5’«f' CC- Rp 19 \ ♦ fTDrtosfs Act A Appf.fj MISC NftTti ?Arc K! VI'^.IONl, ■tIHW s _±JOML^/MP ff'MEL N'.-RlH :«ve, mM 55461- «... 1,4"l-'‘ |-t«MO FlK^r FUio}? PU\N FP-2