The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09-16-1991 Planning Packet1 CITY OP ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 1991 - 7:00 P.M. 1275 BRONN ROAD SOUTH - COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - Gabriel Jabbour ATTENDANCE - SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS - 7:00 p.m.1. #1676 City of Orono, 700 Old Crystal Bay Rd North- ConditionalUse Permit - Continuation of Public Hearing 7:15 p.m.2. #1680 Daniel & Roberta Vaughan, 205 Tonka Avenue - Subdivision of Lot Line Rearrangement 3. #1681 Daniel 6 Robert Vaughan, 205 Tonka Avenue - Variance - Public Hearing 8:00 p.m.4. #1683 Robert F. Suess, 2590 Watertown Road - Preliminary Subdivision Class III ACTION ITEMS - Review of these items v/ill commence prior to or between scheduled public hearings. Applicants presenting variance requests before the Commission are asked to move to the podium at the front of the Chambers when their application is announced by the Chairman. 5. #1608 Jeunes R. Hartzell, 2987 Casco Point T<cad - Variance - Continuation cf Public Hearing 6.#1669 John Walker, 1310 Spruce Place - Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing 7. #1677 Cedric Dettloff, 1255 Dickenson Street Variance - Public Hearing 8. #1678 Paul & Marcia Merlo, 2142 Shadywood Road - Variance - Public Hearing 9. #1679 William F. Miller, 2691 Casco Point Road - Variance - Public Hearing 10. #1682 Christine Brickley, 3262 North Shore Drive Variance - Public Hearing dm !• . F ■■ •f'rm ;«hh CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, SEPTBMBFJl 16, 1991 - 7:00 P.M. 11.#1684 David & Anne Graham, 2745 Shady’^-ood Road Variance - Public Hearing 12. #1685 Edward F. Baker, 3059 Farview Lane - Variance - Public Hearing SI^TCB PLAN REVIEW 13. #1686 John Burger, 3750 Bayside Road - Sketch Plan Review Planning Coomission Cooments - 14. Report by Planning Commission representative to Council meeting of September 9, 1991. 15.Status report by Lake Use Committee representatives. a. Review of Interim Ordinance approved by Council August 26 1991 b. Other 16. Status report by Facilities Committee representatives. 17. Other Issues. Additional Items - 18. Planning Commission approval of minutes of the August 19- 1991 meeting. 19. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend October 14, 1991 Council meeting. Adjournment ~ i To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Conmissicn Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Actxng City Administrator Gerhardson /. From: Date: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator September 12, 1991 Subject #1676 City of Orono, 700 Old Crystal Bay Road - Conditional Use Permit - Continuation of Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-*1B Pertinent Ordinances - A, Section 10.27, Subdivision 3 A - Public service structure setback required. Required = 50' Proposed = 50' (Note; 50' setback is maintained from elevated bowl area at 70* diameter.) 3.Section 10.75, Subdivisions 1 and 2 - Height of structures. Conditional use permit required if structure is greater than 45' in height. Allowed * 30' Per Section 10.75, Subdivision 1 Allowed = 45' Per Section 10.75, Subdivision 2 Additional height request approved under this Section sed by City = 145' (Note: Special setbacks are not required as a condition of increases in height, only a 50' setback applies per the above referenced Code Section.) List of Exhibits - A - Cook Report 9/12/91 B - Staff Letter to Cook 8/28/91 C - Certificate of Mailing - Re-notification D - Excerpt from Sewer and Water Agreement PUD-Otten E - Municipal Water Plan P - Elevation Discussion Please review Exhibits A and B. Cook has responded to concerns expressed by members of the Planning Commission and the Design Committee for the new facility. Cook will be present for the 7:00 p.m. public hearing to respond to any questions of the public or members of the Planning Commission. Staff has enclosed an excerpt from the sewer and water agreement for the Otten PUD that would not allow installation of a municipal well on Outlot B. Outlot B is the outlot that contains the municipal well and pumphouse located in the northeast portion of the Otten's property. In consideration of the number of delays in reviewing this application, the conditional use permit for the municipal water tower application will be presented for Council action at their September 23, 1991 meeting. ij 'I Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & 1\ I Associates Crc S ’c-vf-^TC -! .c:cs- C c Vi-/ *1 u Sc*^: J 5 I <?t- A -S ?:*3*5 V/ ^nr 3:-;: C J.*;;-r. *2 A Enofncers & Architects September 12,1991 Vif< A. -art-.-. Pi •?: < PS vc-i? T •! P ^S 2^/ 3 O L^t^J. .V <^5 VC4C C. '<^r.vi ’’! n v:‘ir3, Ps. <e-fer^ p a-ct:-;.-, •? Vi-c 3 >; C Jwue« ^ a ! Ar;^i >§ ^•yAj-s A P5 s> #• £»5?*T£". PE Vj < A. 'xa PE j P? i-;e; Vjn.-ex A3:V *£ ^;^Il P. A ! A Cry P ^ i-rr. *.Vrc; 4 .t-jcr, PS I, •• **5 C*?.t -T •»£ C •• .A A<.-ei V »r- >1 CP .e'^ 5 Pf-j;.*- P5 i C »<' >1 9 3t&3W P§ ji*y *A/ Pf ; A PC *:**t*^ « 'tsa P| CN.^fiA ErcfX'^ •T3 V P-A? IT) Hjfijo M O ‘4A City of Orono Attention: Jeanne Mabusth Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 5532;13 Re: 139-1676 City Facilities Dear Jeanne: The City of Orono elevated water reservoir is proposed to be constructed east of Old Crystal Bay Road on the north end of the City property. The reservoir could be moved to another location, provided a suitable site can be obtained. The preferred location for the tower would be near Old Crystal Bay Road, either north or south of TH 12. The water system is designed to keep the supply (well) and storage (tower) separated. This gh^es the greatest efficiency in providing fire flow to any area within the distribution system. The proposed elev ’ated tower designs shown on the attached plan provide the most cost effective options. Whenever the designer varies significantly from the options shown, costs increase significantly. (S1.25/gal. to Sl.50/gal) We can develop additional design options if desired by the City. The City has the choice of either elevated or ground storage. The elevated tank would be approximately 145' high and the ground water reservoir would be approximately 60 ’ high. The types of storage selected depends on the desires of the Ciry and the overall system economics. It is desirable to have some elevated storage on any water distributor system. The Orono system will have only one reservoir for a number of years so v/e would recommend that it be elevated. The operation and maintenance cost for the ground water storage system is generally higher than for elevated storage. The booster pumps necessaiy to get the water from the ground reservoir to the distributor system result in increased construction and operation costs. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:lk Attachment ioatu tfniii Ki r k i o o % v^A.:L ^ CITY of ORONO .\funidpal OflBcea Post Office Box 66 Cr>bui Eav, Minnesoia 553w*^'<X>o V Vt^Bsnof< August 28/ 1991 Glenn Cook BonestroO/ Rosene/ Anderlik & Associates 2335 West Trunk Hwy. 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 RE: Application #1676 - City of Orono for Siting of Water Tower - Conditional Use Permit Dear Glenn: The above referenced application has been rescheduled before the September 16, 1991 Planning Commission at 7:00 p.m. You are once aoain asked to present the application and respond »-o any questions members of the Planning Commission or the public may have. At both the Planning Commission and the Design meetings for the new facility, members raised the folio g qulstions that you should be prepared to respond to or to provide additional information: other available designs for water towers. If customizing is a consideration, provide cost factors in comparison with standard dasigns available. Pros and cons on a ground/vault storage system. Members•found this approach most acceptable in light of the visual impact of the 140' high tower. Review various options of access to ''^^ter tower in relation to minimizing impact on site and additional cost factors. TELEPHO.VE - 473-7357 • FA.X • 473-0510 V Glenn Cook Augusl: 28# 1991 Page 2 4. r The original sewer and water agreements were to be reviewed so that members of both the Design Committee Ind Planning Commission may view a prior agreement that would reauire that the water tower be placea to the west of the Otten property. A copy of that agreement will be submitted for Planning Commission review. 5.Ti- has been suggested that you review other properties ilthln the area adjacent lo Highway 12 that may be suitable for placement of tower. Please let me know if I "“ b* reeti^g'''’® K^oi^are^nabirto your place. Sincerely# Jeanne A. Mabusth . . ^ . Building & Zoning Administrator cc:John Gerhardson# Acting City Administrator JAM/1SV i i « ^•1 CERTIFICATE OP MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO ) ss. I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin Countyr Minnesota^ do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1676» was mailed to the attached list of property owners . In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 26th day of August, 1991. / > ">i Jamie Bosma f / -r^----------------------------............................................................................................................. r P U 0 3. £i®ilii-;HtS| the City is delayed in installing sewer and -ater it is hoped that the City would perait at least limited occupancy of the buildings on the site so that ui*e Developer's business can appropriately and properly commence sales in the fall of 1990. rnnvevanrfl of Well Site; In consideration of the foregoing and in consideration of $11 500, the Developer will deed to the City Outlot B, Eak Willow woods for the test well and for the permanent municipal well site. Outlot B shall not be used as a tower site. This restriction or. tne use ot uuulot B sKall lu?5ive the closing and the City. The form of the deed is attached heret Exhibit^E and will be delivered upon execution of this agreement and payment of the said sum. 4. party. above written. In Presence of: J rr\U^ THERESA L. NAAB MOwSy WBUC - MINNESOTA 3sf£2ii'ar« P’ Ji Initials of Developer Initials of City Page 3 of 4 ir III lajiUtam ! . Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse^ City Administrator Frc»i: Date: Subject: Michael P. Gaffron# Asst Plannino & Zonino Administrator September 12, 1991 #1680 Daniel and Roberta Vaughan/Todd and Marie Ziesmer, 205 Tonka Avenue/3440 Bayside Road - Lot Line Rearrangement - Public Hearing #1681 Daniel and Roberta Vaughan, 205 Tonka Avenue - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IA, Single family lakeshore residential, 2 acre, unsewered but future sewer discussion underway Application: #1680 - Rearrange lot line between 205 Tonka Avenue and 3440 Bayside Road (Ziesmer property, Vaughan's daughter and son-in-law) to leave 2.0 acres in Ziesmer property and increcs' ^-ughan property to 1.91 acres #1681 - Request for .i r*^t area variance to construct a new single family re«i''“ xice at 205 Tonka Avenue NOTE: The property is within the lakeshore ares subject to the subdivision moratorium. There is some doubt on staff's part as to whether a lot line rearrangement of this nature was intended to be subject to the moratoriuun. Planning Commission may wish to make a recommendation on the merits of the proposal and make a recommendation that Council review the moratorium issue at their next meeting. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibii. D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - Exhibit K - Application #1680 Application #1681 Plat Map Property Owners List Applicant's Letter of Request Survey Proposed Site Plan & Septic Layout Diagram Hardcover Calculations Original Ziesmer Lot/Septic Approval 1988 Moratorium Ordinance Septic Layout of Properties to the East Pertinent Facts X •Lot Area Existing ProDosed Variance "205 Tonka 1.56 Ac 1.91 Ac 0.90 Ac(5%) 3440 Bayside 2.35 Ac 2.00 Ac — — Lot Width " Tonka-Frontage 130'*Same 70' (35%) " Tonka-Bldg. Site 140'—— 118'118'(No Change) * As measured 50' "Brook Street", by north of and definition. oara11 el to undeveloped I 1 Will k laal.! ii^ >t iifltfl k 301-'k’■! .‘.A< lAtar , 1 i Zoning File #1680 September 13, 1991 Page 2 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Mr» Vaughan has purchased the triangular-shaped property at 205 Tonka Avenue from Florian Sterner contingent on being able to obtain a building permit. A copy of the Purchase Agreement is on file, signed by both parties. Mr. Vaughan is Mrs. Ziesmer's father, and the Vaughan's and the Ziesmer's have agreed to a lot line rearrangement which leaves Ziesmer's with 2.00 dry buildable acres, and increases 205 Tonka to almost 2 acres. The new certainly odd shapedr but makes use of the high point of the property as a potential building site. The Ziesmer's are still on a holding tank/temporary trench drainfield system, and all parties involved are strongly in favor of the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project. The proposed new building site is west of the existing residence at 225 Tonka. Staff's interpretation of the setback requirements is that this easterly lot line would be considered a side lot line for setback purposes, requiring a 30' setback. The new house is proposed 30' from the east line and 38' from the west line (see Exhibit H). As a result of the proposed lot line rearrangement, the original drainfield sites delineated for the Ziesmer residence will end up underneath the proposed new house. Applicants were advised that septic testing would be needed to show that, in the absence of a sewer project, both lots have adequate drainfield sites for primary and future systems. Testing was submitted on September 10, and there are two significant problems with the drainfield sites. The primary and alternate proposed sites for the Ziesmer residence are designed for a 3 bedroom home. The original septic approval for Ziesmer's residence in 1988 required that the drainfield design be expanded from 4 bedrooms to 5 bedrooms given the 5 bedroom house plan submitted. (Remember that this system has never been constructed due tc Ziesmer's hope that sewer comes soon). To date only 2 or 3 bedrooms have been finished, the basement is unfinished. The second issue is that the proposed primary and future drainfield sites at a 3 bedroom design extend to within 2' of the proposed new let line. In order to meet the necessary 20' setback, the lot line would have to be moved leaving only a 20' setback to the proposed new house The other or»tion is for staff to grant a setbacx variance for the mound system. Normally such a variance is only granted in a pre-existing problem situation where there are no other options. With a design that doesn't account for 2 i i 1 ftmiiiii m ......... < ~na .-rtriia 1 Zoning File #1680 September 13» 1991 Page 3 future bedrooms and the situation where the lot line and house location can still be rearranged to avoid setback variances / I would hesitate to grant a septic setback variance unless sewer is a certainty and the substandard setback would only persist for a year or two. Two questions remain - Can the Ziesmer septic sites be expanded to accomodate a 5 bedroom house as originally proposed? If so, can lot lines be arranged so that no setback variances are necessary for either the mounds or the proposed house? 7.Access to the new building site will be via a 450' private driveway extending northward and westward from the north end of Tonka Avenue. Note that the westerly extension of Brook Street from Tonka Avenue has been vacated, hence that is not a viable direct access route. 8.In regard to the requested lot area variance, the standard question to ask is whether additional land is available for purchase to increase the lot size so that a variance is not required. In fact. Lots 3 and 4, Block 3, Bayside Addition, « ^ ^ ^ ^ M ^ * m ^ M . a « ^ mmm % . _i.e. a 100' x 125' pair of lots just south of 225 Tonka Avenue, are expected to go tax forfeit fairly soon. This came to the attention of staff as part of the Stubbs Bay Sewer Study. However, it is unlikely whether those lots will have a significant impact on the septic system situation and would not affect the applicant's house placement. 9.Regarding the lot width variance that technically is required, while the property has 245' of frontage on the undeveloped Brook Street, by definition lot width is measured at the 50' front setback line. The lot width 50' north of Brook Street is 130', requiring a 70' variance. Granting of this variance perhaps should be considered in the context of the lot width at the actual building site and how it relates to the proposed site plan. Discussion Please review applicant's letter of request. In staff's opinion, the lot line rearrangement and area/width variance requests might be reasonable if city sewer was a virtual certainty. To date, it's not. Site evaluator Steve Schirmers tells me that the primary and alternate ziesmer sites cannot be reasonably expanded to accomodate a 5 bedroom house. The Building Inspectors tell me that while the Ziesmer residence had an unfinished basement, the potential for additional bedrooms certainly exists, and it is probably not realistic to expect that the existing house will nevtrr expand above 3 bedrooms, although that point is arguable. ""I' Zoning File #1680 September 13, 1991 Page 4 Applicant notes that a covenant to disallow construction of Ziesmer's 4th and 5th bedrooms until sewer comes, might be acceptable to solve this. Issues to Consider 1.Has the applicant shown that there are suitable drainfield sites to serve existing and proposed houses, meeting all code requirements? 2.How does the possibility of a municipal sewer affect Planning Commission's view of this request? 3.Is there any justification for granting either drainfield lot line setback variances or a house side setback variance in the context of a lot line rearrangement wh.ere the house can still be redesigned or moved? 4.If the septic systems were not an issue, does Planning Commission feel there is justification to grant the lot width and lot area variances? Should applicant pursue acquiring additional property to eliminate the lot area variance need? Would this additional property make this a more viable building site? 5.Although staff has not discussed this issue extensively with the property owenr, is there justification to request creation of some sort of cul-de-sac or turnaround at the end of Tonka Avenue? This is merely a lot line rearrangement not creating new lots, but there might be a basis to attach that sort of a condition to a variance approval, or request an easement for future use. Options for Recommendation 1.Recommend that the issue of moratorium applicability be addressed by the Council at their next meeting. 2.Consider tabling the request until a definite decision on city sewer has been made. 3.Grant conceptual approval subject to the lot line rearrangement and variance not coining into effect until city sewer has been ordered to serve these properties. 4.Table, requesting applicant to revise his proposal so that the septic sites are deemed suitable with no variances needed, and relocating or redesigning the house so that no setback variances are necessary. 5. Approve as requested. 6. Penial, specifying the reasons for same. 7. Other. 4 CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address_ _ _^ ,<7- A-r-i- dtsU t ^■A Ic;^rf604 ^ V'- ^---1 ■ - ,/A tr '.M property Identification Number (P.I.D.) o:y~ Please check one - Property __/ abstract or // . ‘C' '-T^ .orrens." »*' 7 *V Tf £7 I*; yr'ljlI I C'l IJlNli/lVW^ rrrj/ivrr nrrrrrAttach legal description to application. APPLICANT Phone (home ) 7S- 3 ^ ^^^'OOvO .J ^ imim* * m W W Name l/rO^^-A^Z (work) -^^3 • ■ i M mid ■ ... ,r I n —■ ■ . !■■-. ................ > liuLuir|— # ilhim 1 uu V .'4V VM uv^'i Tvi/'^ i'/"*? 7^0*r Address :/>^6 > S_ _ _ City ^ ^ ^-'h~_ _ _ ^ ___________ _ __ tmm mm mm mm mm mm mm 0 m 00m mm 0mm mm mm rnmm mmt mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm ^m OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Name i^o.cU'V S ^Phone (work) Address: 5^5~q________ City (attach list if more than one) ZiD:'•*■/ ‘7 EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size 3 ^ /Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check)Residential; no. of units _ _[ Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Zoning District /- PROPOSAL Divis-. n for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites A Number of Building Sites:/Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Units per3. 7/ Acres y7 y 2^ Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check)Residential Other (specify) ^. ■5 • MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION Completed Application ?om Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Sur-zey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 35C (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 4. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ijate FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II s III)$150.00 Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrancement 250.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision)250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) 300.00 + 20.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Date Ovmer's Signature Date i^Applicant must have all submi«als into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. I v:: J'tVI ,>r <« N UO SOT CUfY uC ir -**L STANDARH PURCHASE AC?REEMENT ^S.> > C, CF.‘ ».N V r-#T* n riNKB.iM *F •••f’ iyg'jst 6_._____ , V rr^vjfi ------------—-------^ 9 nu '3 •/ *3 •9 •7 -3 ______________ •Snak-211B-Q ‘ rennepln ___________srj«t d f.* 0**0TTO ___—_________.CO‘J''T»0'------------J'TTT'.. TorosirrWgrirT^rrthls agrgggenLjJjjUL ^Jial^^ ^ tHS^ n.^,u s^^»^ ff' i d»Y Wd w e>^*»« to '■>>« o' ‘ ---------------------- 15 Av 21 ?? O i* 2S 2*J 27 :a --------------—-----------------------------------------------, -•'J 10 P« " J21_____________« »^ ^*“"''* « t^SfMerj re«lva_tot4l_corLS.1d?r^o...s^rii^ y^ai^. In'd scecial asaestointj Pt ciQsImi.I£Ilt'^^dVeiS^._s_j(------- prpv lsions lfl^liti£LS^7 tQ-4 2»^lnc .lu5l—------------------------ "" y» -. jI Atttchtd$r§ »u -tdd^TxK>n3$\^^ic^*rtma^aojri®*General ___ --------------------------------------— / > }ih» »-d Bu.«« »8'»«» 10 0«------------' ’ o' 1**»» »'■» CO.*N« m I •« >»•' Ceed. 3/ 31 VJ vwSacti (to not ;rle<(f »• t^rth p'esoni improvomonti RCAlESTATITAXfS »9»»W to pJv 19__Sctior asrooi to pay_________' t2!*>s and Bu^ar are^» *o pay a^ payaWa in it*a yaar 19 — -. , _!1—avaaato -11.1—1 __' tJtha oT annual irsia*i«»^a*«t ot ♦paoai assas*n*a '*§ dm on iha date o* doaar^ an $pac»ai •J5ei»ma'*i$ le^ ad and pend ^ Bj»ar a'-ail pay fa«ta dua and pavabia «i tha year 19 21 a'-d any on^d instanme-i’a o< ipecial assnsmaMif pa>ab't tSafewith ^1 42 aoii tbtfaafief Sa^ar y^ar^ams tKai ia«ef dwi and pa>abla m ih# vMr 19 '^•1! ba Non bon^astead 13 m4 45<c 47 *b J9 50 >1 57 S3 :*4 ;5 c«af»*'*cjt on Ne isa» SaHtf nor SaHar t A^nt ma^et any repfaienta*ion conca^mog ra amount ot lutu*f f-a» e»M»# ia>et VMAAAANliE^ Saatf-vaaieany » ^ t^«*{i»nfa;-»^anvr a*a-am»'eJyw4hin-l‘»a-9a'jndapy-8noa-o^4A#t»a»»‘«#ar^!i#-»fc^an*a <i*i.'mr^qaia.iT*»t ayaa^norvr > »% .. *'>^nai^and n>dat-0uye^ap*^ra»itH^«a'na*tn%onoy-tsa ^aaMuoiJed tuojvae POSSESSION Sai'ac agroai to daiKar poasastioo not iaia» tKin —JlL-------------------------------cio4 ng Allintaeaftcitywatat andaawarebafgat. a'acinc noiuraiga«csjygaa.^f^je^a-d J-ju^li ai'oitumgai »nailb^c'o (a*ad:j^ p^amiMf baVt poatatfion data TIUe A EXAMINATION Sailar •ball, wilhm a raafoitab'a uma altar accepranca o.' th»t aa aamant furmih an Abypact or iiUa. o* a Begiitartd Proparty Abttracl, ca'til ed to data to mctuda proper seard'ot co^ ti.ng bankrup«'iea. Slate arxi Fa/aral ludjmaou and l»ani 8 Jrai •sea ba aPowad 10 butmaas daya aftar racaipf for e«arT>»nai*on o# tale and rr-axing any objafiont yynicb ibatl ba mjda in vwrt rg or deemed •C yya»vad Ifanyobiaaionistomada.Sailar tbaUbtaMowadlTOdaysiomaiiatiiiamrkeiabia Ptndmgcofect'nnoM,|ia.pa»n>*ntshatetirvief 57 ragutfad shall bt Mtponrrd. but upon corraci.on of tit’a and ^ thm 10 days ahar v>Mian not>^^ to Buyar ^9 pi'*'es tbal ptrform tn 1 agraamant according to iia tarma If tirla »a ryjt corrtctad yy.ih»n 120 (taya from fnt data of yvTitttn ob-acttort th f »;'/amant a»%ail bt r>u« 8->d y^. ai option of Buyar. naifhtr party th#a ba l^t *or damagts bare jndar to tha other and aarnas! money • ba rafundad to Buyer OEfAULT If Uilaitma'^ftaWaor lacorrKtadvyrthlntaidiirT>a a^d Buyer dafauiis marry of the a<fraanrani|h#e« n SaRar may term n«(etb.s agraa rant andoo mch termination all pay marMs made ha^aundar sfiaii ba rata«nad by Se'lar and Agent ja ineir reypectna mtaresti may appear, at Undateddamagta t*ma ba«ng of tha attanct hereof. This prevision •^^a4 not dapr^ aft**ar party of the right o' o-vlcr tmg t* i« spectlc parlormanca of thi$ agreamant. p^ovdad th»§ agreement •• not tarn^natad arvl aci«on to anforca H>ac'i< parfcrmance •* convr.^nred w»th.n t«t mootsi *f*er •uch r.gnf of acHon irtsat. In Iha avtni 6uy«r defaults in h»s partcrmanca of the terms of Ih.f Ag^aamaf •? ar'd Notice c* CsnceHa? on s 55 served upon Ihf Buyer pursuant to MSA 559 2t. the larrmnaiton period shall be tr' rty |3Q) daysat perm HadScbd^ts*on 4 of MSA «57 2t ■i7 ACCEPTANCE Buyar understarda ard agrees that ihts tala «s subject to accapcanca b> Saiiar *n v»rt(N.g Agent •• ryot 1 spia or rtapors bfa <41 pry account of itWt tg'tamant. e*capt to return or account for the earnest mor^ 13 AGENCY DISCLOSURE Or brok en * <nvo1 vg d h# or Sh# is fep»»%mi!ng the_______ i: ________ <0 Wi this transaction. Tha Rstlnf agent or broker slfpulalet ha or sh§ it reprtsenftng the sellar in e^lt iransacHon. 56 5*- r'lT .1 • « 53 I 7| I. Iha owner o' ihscpramsas.^ccapi 72 I**# M'a he rbyiy^ 7J sriLfR • grctmani and 74 SELLER _JL I ag*ea to purchase the pramnes 'gr the pr<e jnd on the larrs ard cond«i wna sefr^ ttf above 8U>£R Roberta E. Vaughan (/ t__ BU'^TR >*5 Oa'tvary of ai papers artd mon«ai shea ba rrada at the offica of • 9 Company Dofiald H. Lamn> Esq._____________ 77 Adi^Mf 6629 lyrd<s1p Aua S, ___— S#a<ng Agt.M______ Zpi£431 „ /8 THIS IS A LEGALLY BINDINO CONTRACT. IF NOT UNOERSTQOD. sEEK COMPETENT ADVICE. A ♦5 r L. I'n CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION ’ c^U •4*''Initial Application Fee $x/5.0C ($50.00*per each additional variance) §j Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Jg After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) 1 % V o 'A PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) / / -7 - .i 3 - _^co*3 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICAITP Name ^2^1n//r=‘/ Uf^f^ A Phone (home)/- 7 ^ g»d-o Address: /-^d.-z/zL/n'iz _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (work) E i)/L c i t V: ///.7 ^r4- Zip: / OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address:City;Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also cwn the adjacent parcels of land. PIRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning Distric w M / /iA. Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DBSCRIPTIOH OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: Estimated Construction Cost $ 2^ 4 ^ ^ /r J VARIANCES REQUIRED V" Lot Area Setback Variances ( X Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear) Other HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting rrc: enforcement cf zoning regulations 0m Sm ^ m 4> V'/-r I •r ‘ f z'.', L If DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements ; v __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ • 2. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1 - Comoleted Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Cg^^ificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8J;"xll"). Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy Sh-'x!!"). As an addendum to this applicationr please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour variance application is not complete __if—the —above jpforma-fcxon has not been included* APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature -r-/Date p' 2 -9 ,■ OWNERS SIGNATURE . r t. The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and fur^-her authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date /■'-z .i -7/ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 1 i _____ •^-^ *"'**** : ST I NEiJr = •: (19) Z ADlDi • (1!) ViM 35- ( !C)34f M 1 W. 5 too S V g 75 ..^(41) 2 (9) no too V* '''> / D»f r-f$9 5 i*I3/ I / (•3) 2» 7W %T^0- ri7» (4?) 3 n 9 ^ 'W 91 _ J3 <5 ol^ a ^ __LW_______NO\nJi_B'' ti «., n 3«2 ' * •? »i ,;i, «i ^ 5 (2Z) ' irc M ^ S B '. r' ^ •• f_i 0 (M) a BIQ■?i Is a ra(?5) S :2S 25 C9) a :s »v*7 B ** 'HI ? i 1 R 4 5 : M 9 / »r; .. ?;r: RUN DATE 08/16/91 BATCH' 001 PROP AODR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP AODR OmER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER HAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP AODR C»tlER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP VDDR OmER NAHE TAXPAYER NAKc/ADOR r PROP ADDR OtlER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR r r HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY ONNERS LIST 38 05-117-23 19 0019 00235 CRESTVIEN AVE DANIEL JOHN SHEA DANIEL J SHEA 235 CRESTVIEN LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 05-117-23 19 0022 00265 CRESTVIEN AVE DANA Vn§i LACHOHITZER DANA LYNN LACHOHITZER 265 CRESTVIEN AVE LONG LAKE m 55356 38 05-117-23 19 0025 00285 CRESTVIEN AVE C HOSLEY JR I S H HOSLEY CURTIS JR I SHANNON HOSLEY 285 CRESTVIEN AVE LONG LAKE m 55356 38 05-117-23 19 0028 00250 : TONKA AVE GERALD L BRIGGS GERALD L BRIGGS 250 TONKA AV LONG LAKE HN 55356 }• 38 05-117-23 19 0039 00390 , TOTiCA AVE KENNETH H BOLLUN BRAD D PETERSON 390 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE m 55356 38^ 05-117-23 19 0092 00300 TONKA AVE JAHES L PATRIN JAHES L PATHIH 73 H GEORGE ST PAUL HN 55107 . : I . if -i i K j < < • 38 05-117-23 19 0020 00295 CRESTVIEN AVE OOIS RITCHIE OOIS RITCHIE 295 CRESTVIEN LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 05-117-23 19 0025 00275 CRESTVIEN AVE HAROLD R HANSON ETAL HAROLD R HANSON 275 CRESTVIEN AVE LONG LAKE tti 55356 38 05-117-23 19 0026 00280 TONKA AVE DIO QUNELL DEAN R I DORIANN 0 QUNELL 280 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 05-117-23 19 0029 00230 TONKA AVE JAHES K FULKERSON I HIFE JAHES K FULKERSON 230 TONKA AVE , LONG LAKE m 55356 38 05-117-23 19 0090 00330 TONKA AVE L L ANDERSON ISA ANDERSON LENIS L I SUSAN A Af^DERSON 5000 NORTH ARH DR HOUND m 55369 38 05-117-23 19 0052 03390 DAYSIDE RO ROBT N I BARBARA HUBER ET AL ROBERT I BARBARA HUBER 3390 BAYSIOE RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 « « REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 3 38 05-117-23 14 0021 00255 CRESTVIEN AVE JOYCE P SOUTOR OTTEN JOYCE OTTEN GARGELHOFF 15630C 26TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55447 38 05-117-23 14 0024 00265 CRESTVIEN AVE C MOSLEY JR A S M MOSLEY CURTIS JR A SHAFtJON MOSLEY 285 CRESTVIEN AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 ■* =1 38 05-117-23 14 0027 00280 TONKA AVE 0 A 0 QUNELL DEAN R A DORIANN D QUNELL 280 TONKA AVE LOfKl LAKE MN 55356 ,1 ' ^\ ♦ -'.I ) 38 05-117-23 19 0030 00315 CRESTVIEN AVE JOHN L SHANNON ET AL SHANNON/NANKIVELL 315 CRESTVIEN AVE LONG LAKE HN 55356 • t* 'i 38 05-117-23 19 0091 00320 TONKA AVE L L ArH)ERSON ISA ANDERSON LENIS L I SUSAN A Af40ERSON 5000 NORTH ARH DR HOUND HN 55369 4'j ll 38 05-117-23 19 0055 00290 CRESTVIEN AVE LUCILLE H HELBY LUCILLE H HELBY 290 CRESTVIEN AVE LONG LAKE HN 55356 UU8I J I : RUN DATE OB/U/n BATCH 001 PROP ADDR ONNER HAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 1 ^ PROP AOOR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR . /' PP'^ ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR ONNER NAra TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR f:: 'V .PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR t . . V * HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHI«RS LIST S8 05-117-23 13 0021 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED V H LARSON ETAL VINCENT H LARSON 790 NORTH ARH DR HOUND m 5536^ 38 05-117-23 13 0025 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED E 8 TALBERT ETAL TA>0’AYER TO LET FORFEIT 38 05-117-23 13 0028 00295 TONKA AVE H A R SCHHITZ HENRY A ROSIE SCHHITZ 295 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE MN ' 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0042 03464 EASTLAKE ST HAN HUKSLEY HARK A HUNCVEY 3464 E LAKE ST LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0045 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO HATTHEN E HANLEY HATTHEN E HANLEY 3470 DAYSIDE RD ORONO HN 55356 PROP ADDR OmER NAHE TAXPAYER . NAHE/ADDR 38 05-117-23 14 0011 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO DOUGLAS L NASH ET AL DOUGLAS A SHIRLEY NASH 270 CRESTVIEN AVE LONG LAKE HN 55356 V? f * • I It/ f life A 38 05-117-23 13 0023 00225 TOMCA AVE CAROLE J HALSH CAROLE J HALSH 225 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0026 00265 TONKA AVE ESTHER H ADDISON ESTHER H AOLISON 3382 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0029 00038 AODRESS UNASSIGNED ESTHER M ADDISON ESTHER H ADDISON 3382 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0063 03666 EASTLAKE ST D A HONGE ANA HONGE DEAN A A NANCY A HONGE 3666 EAST LAKE.ST S LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0067 00038 ADORESS UNASSIGNEO A T A B H BALGAARD ALVIN T A BEATRICE BALGAARD 3560 BAYSIDE ROAD LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 05-117-23 16 0017 Onn^a ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO 0Li4>^AS L NASH ET AL D0UG;.aS a SHIRLEY NASH 270 CRESTVIEN AVE LONG LAKE HN 55356 REPORT NO. PI635401 PAGE 2 38 05-117-23 13 0026 00038 ADORESS UTUSSIGNED E B TALBERT ETAL TAXPAYER TO LET FORFEIT 38 05-117-23 13 0027 00265 TONKA AVE ESTHER H ADDISON ESTHER H ADDISON 3382 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0030 03600 BAYSIDE RD DAS ESTERS DANIEL A SANDRA ESTERS 3600 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 ft) i.-y 58 05-117-25 15 00<»4 0542<^ EASTLAKE ST T E RADKE AHA RAOKE THOMAS E A MARGARET A RAOKE 5<*2<V EASTLAKE ST LONG LAKE 555S6 4 38 05-117-23 14 0009 00270 CRESTVIEN AVE DOUGLAS L NASH ET AL DOUGLAS A SHIRLEY NASH 270 CRESTVIEN AVE LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 05-117-23 16 0018 00290 CRESTVIEN AVE BAD YOUNG PATTY L CLAPP 290 CRESTVIEN AVE LONG LAKE HN 55356 C. ■J V. RUN DATE 0e/14/9I BATCH 001 PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR # PROP ADOR OltCR NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR ■ ; • S PROP AOOR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADOR r ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER . NAHE/AODR PROP ADOR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADOR OlOIER NAHE T/U<PAYER . NAHE/AODR A*. HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST . • 1*1 58 05-117-25 11 0005 00095 LEAF ST E C 6RAHAH JR ETAL E C GRAHAM JR 95 LEAF ST LONG LAKE MN 55556 )oir58 05-117-25 12 05615 HIGH LA RICHARD 6 HARKLUNB RICHARD 0 HARKLUND 5615 HIGH LANE LONG LAKE m 55566 58 05-117-25 15 0805 00058 ADDRESS itOiSSIGNED FLORIAN J STERNER ETAL FLORIAN J STERNER 5629 ALDRICH AVE SC^ HPLS HN 55619 58 05-117-25 15 0009 00058 ADDRESS UNASS16NED JEFFREY D HUELLER JEFFREY D HUELLER 222 BEDERNOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55556 58 05-117-25 15 0012 05620 BAYSIDE RO RAN ANDERSON ROBERT F A HENDY S ANDERSON 5620 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE m 55556 58 05-117-25 15 0015 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED V H LARSON ETAL VINCENI H LARSON 790 NORTH ARH DR HOUND m 55566 j,* * y I- « 58 05-117-25 12 0013 00200 BEDERNOOD DR K C THOMAS ETAL JOANN H GUSTAFSON 200 BEDERNOOD DRIVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 3B 05-117-25 12 0021 036B5 CHRISTINE DR M A LARSON A L M LARSON MARK A LARSON 3685 CHRISTINE OR MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 05-117-23 13 0006 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED G L GUSTAFSON ETAL GERALD L GUSTAFSON 200 BEDERNOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0010 00222 BEDERNOOD DR JEFFREY D MUELLER JEFFREY D MUELLER 222 BEDERNOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 3B 05-117-23 13 0013 03660 BAYSIDE RO T M ZIESMER AMT ZIESMER TODD M A MARIE T ZIESMER 5660 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 58 05-117-23 13 0016 03510 BAYSIDE RO LESTER NELSON ETAL LESTER E NELSON 5510 BAYSIDE RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 REPORT NO. PI4J5401 PAGE 1 38 05-117-25 12 0016 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE OF KINN STATE OF MINN tDNR) (LUCE LINE TRAIL I 38 D5-117-25 IS 0002 00215 TONKA AVE MICKY OLSGARO MICKEY OLSGARO P 0 BOX 1016 MPLS rW 55458 38 05-117-23 13 0005 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED G L GL*STAFS0(( ETAL GERALD L GUSTAFSON 200 BEDERNOOD OR LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0011 00220 BEDERNOOD DR G A J GUSTAFSON GERALD L GUSTAFSON 200 BEDERNOOD DRIVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 fi 38 05-117-23 13 0016 03670 BAYSIDE RD MATTHEN E MANLEY MATTHEH E HANLEY 3670 BAYSIDE RD ORONO MN 55356 38 05-117-23 15 0017 03560 BAYSIDE RD A A B BALGAARD BEATRICE H BALGAARD 5560 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 MR £ MRS DANIEL R. VAUGHAN 1266 SHORELINE DRIVE ORONO, MINNESOTA 55391 TO: ORONO CITY COUNCIL AND ORONO PLANNING COMI-IISSION FROM: MR & MRS DANIEL R. VAUGHAN We are eager to get under v/ay on the construction of a new hoiTie at 205 Tonka Avenue. VJe have entered into a purchase agreement with Mr Florian Sterner and a land swap agreement with Mr & Mrs Todd Ziesmer on the two parcels under consideration in this lot line rearrangement and variance request. No additional lots are oeing created by this request. The objective of the request is to provide a suitable building site for a single family dwelling of about 2500 square feet on one level facing the south (front) end of the lot. The driveway entrance would be from the north end of Tonka Avenue circling around the designated septic system areas to the three car garage at the rear of the home. The lot being purchased from Mr. Sterner is 1.6 acres in size and was originally considered a buildable site and therefore assessable for a sewer hook up charge in the STUBBS BAY WASTE MANAGEMENT STUDY of February, 1988. In the rearrangement with the Ziesmers the goal was to leave them with 2+ acres and expand the Sterner lot from 1.6 acres to as close 2 acres as was possible. The Sterner site as 1 I A ... rearranged now has 1.9+ acres and the Ziesmer property has 2+ acres. When probing for suitable primary and secondary septic system sites, several obviously suitable sites v/ere found to not have virgin soil conditions a.id were therefore unsuitable. However, suitable sites have been located on both properties as rearranged. The Ziesmer site requires a side yard setback variance as there are no other suitable sites available on the rearranged Ziesmer site. As you may by now be aware, the owners of both lots under consideration, are eager to see the extension of the sanitary sewer system to this area and understand that it is now again being given serious consideration. For that reason it is the expectation of the owners that none of the septic system sites will ever be put to use. However, if it develops that they are necesary, suitable sites do exist Due to the oncoming cold weather conditions it is necessary that a decision be made on the lot line rearrangement and the variances as soon as is possible. If a favorable conclusion can be arrived at by ooth the planning commission and the city council at their September meetings, construction will start as soon as the building permit can be granted. It is respectfully requested that the lot line rearrangement be approve and the variances be granted so that construction can start ahead of the cold weather season. i ^ ’-■>1 lirfili uimiBkt Your time and consideration in this master is greatly appreciated. ■-’i Sincerely, Roberta E. Vaughan i POGPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR TODD ZIESMER & DANIEL VAUGHAN IN LOTS 5 & 20. AUD. SUB. NO 203. AND SECTION 5-117-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA jABOtih ^^0mr i#*» 4,f*t 0* < fm0'^ (•f»l tMtk 0*S0t f ©V,0 S ..t •» ir> < V ! .1 i V w' e? tXiSTINg LE3AL 3ESC? ! PlfT^l A rr.*t: part of Sov«rr^«ne l5t J. Jactisn i. ?pvr»nAp :K sort.i. :t • L'•«« M iA .«• r or^rr' C-^ -«♦•• i»* •^.•r « « .#1 •« »| «•<§«•• • ^ » tr# ti f.g^ ,.*i L»fr r ># tr *’^*** >1^ jr Tfl» __ t ,0»*»4 00 ' 0* *' •« ts p^n<7« 23 w««t pf rr.« !tft frincipa* .loridian. i«»cr:3€<S as isi- lo^si Bc^mnin^ at a point distant 'iii.Zl fsat watt rf :.“.• ttat Una of t.n Nortnaatt Juartar of Saction 5, Towntnip ’*T. Ran9# 23 and diacanc :54.: faat .‘iOrtn si tna 3outn iina of tr.a iMrtnaaat Quarter of said Sacticr. !: tnanca Cate parallel to tna Soutn line of taxi sortneatt Quarter a distance of 235.'} feet: tAenee Souen and parallel to tnr Last line of said Mort&eaat Quarter a dxatance of 373.1 feet: tnance waat and parallel uLt.n tne Soutn line of taid Nortneaat Quarter a Pit tance of M7.17 feet: tnenca Soutn and parallel wit.n tne Utv line of said Nort&eaat quarter a dietanca of 119,21 feet to t.ta canter line of CAiAtypldadf * tseaee easterly alonq center line of taid road a diatanca of feet to a point distant '55I.2! feet w««t of tna Cast lino cf »aid 'icrtnaatt Quarterr t.iefts# Mnrt.n and parallel to tne Last line of said Hortneaac Quarter • distance of *17.25 feet to t.te point of .>agi.*ini.'iq. Lxerrr t.tat part of tne aoova datcrioed tract deacrioad it folioesj me Soutn 100 feat of tna Nort.n 373,1 feat of tna Satt naif of Lot 2C. Auditor s Suodivition Nuaioer 2(U. rfanna- pin County, Minnaeeta. -I larciil a Lot 5. Auditor's SoDdivision Jhinoar 203 . LXCrTT tfiat part of said Lot 5. descried as follows: ••qinninq at tne wortnN«tt corner of Savside Addition to Laae Mxnnetcnaa: tftence Mort.n- erly alonq a Ixne wnica la tne nortnerly projection of t.ne Westerly line of 11001 3. Bayside Addition to Use Minnatc.nia, to a point wnic.n la 40 faet Soutnvaatarly frost tna Soutnwast- arly line of tne Minnesota waatam Aailreed Coepany riqnt of way, eeaaurad at riqnt anflaa tnartfroai: tnanca Soutnaattarlv slonq a line drawn parailal to tna Souchtescerlr line of said ninnaaota eastern nailreed Coepany none of way and 40 faet distant Soutnveaterly tnerafroe, featured at rigftt anqlas, to tne point of incersection of seid line eitn the Normerly project '.rfi of tne Easterly line of Blr»c* 3. lavside Addition cj Laae nionetonaet tnence Soutnerly rlonq said wort.nerly pro jection of tne Cnatexly line of lioca .. Oeyaide Addition to Laae Minnetonae to tne latarsection of taid lina witn tna Mertnarly line of Beyeide Addition to Late mnnetonaa; tnence Watccrly aloaq tne Nertneriv line of Bavtide Addition to Laae Minnetonae to tne point of oeainnirq. ■r l?a» •a#* Co. <d. Ne. mia survey intends to snow tne boundaries of tne aoeva- da- tcribed property, end tna location of an atiatinq nouaa and two atiatinq tfiede tnaraon. It doat not purport to snow any ocnar leprovaeewte er aacreteneanta. ♦ •i- 'ftru. tv I ( i'4f»IIWm. •W 9% rnmN & Crontoc. Inc f.rv’vn-^ Sf. I'Lilllhy^ , 1,,^ ^ ft4f, i ». im i**s»r* trw .4» • * ‘ ■4. *4f -•5VQ I «4«B -V - / jTur.Kk. \v»tuu • L»ni^ • V' «>i:4rwui 'A •■-•“I*#* if- ^ • \t, % • L • 1i^. r _«.:=!. i »• ai . ^ y - ryg-^or: .!> 7 y-.TVf^ -«% \W'« h».h ; c _iU££’ •■*j ’i. •i ^ ^ \ *'<»ovc«r> >^«V4 K<\\K» \Wr W^.i ><.<1 f<L. faj ev.\- W^tr< &\<v^ <: f*7*u-Uk*- i, .i/s Vrf-- c4> ly • \ '> toOC^K^. i*t-^ ' K ' \ , ' \* ' f"t \ \ / Ic. * O / ^ / S., N--^ WCa^V^• *’•, -f<. V JKniiJLS. -JEtr M.ra- “-%• k>i£L C» v>c* 1 * rcr*>rsvo / — r«—V r-L.r . I isIk- \ Av / ^jU /-V'N^Wi / ' N V V . -f c.^ t' •. 4 a l>Vcn^,«v*•«!_, * u^73 . j “5*^ ' *1 1 ■4 I C ^ti 1 V^ V.^ V ry % v«1 -,P t-M * • A •*% .»i*a.?. <w*C- AVCA% ♦ ccw»v-(Vwcrrio>A 1 AtPvi^ •x i\ Xi (•,< tA\-.^\V^\. *V^ N>V< V-W S^P*e- vu-r \.^vA^ rc-;i. v4ov\t.c. "3o**^rau\r^"^ .-ao* ^ ^ i.'ivrv'Tri d y y •^’Lvvl-’.•tcl* Q«»- -Cv^O ovl v^iu-e, ft-r S Pe/co’ofiofl Tf its ^Soil Borv^S 0 B^'C^. Mofh «;rnl>. I - '.■'1. PROPER'nr CF-VtM'«r' VA^^‘^i:it;,«. tot < r. Note Thfs systrr^ is lo be constructed to meet trve t^rv>esc J Pollution Contro! Ager^ Chopter 7080 fc Local Ordinance Designed By S-P TESTING INC. Dote PH 612-497-3566 Q % ♦ rr-.^-y Ti t -_A HARDCOVER CALC'JLATICfl WCRKOHEET SETBACK ICNE: (CIHCLz CNS) 0-75' 75-250' Existing H areccveh in Zone ^cp.r.-r,. , f-r.-irff]' A. House 1X Tl!‘ -r^c:-S 1 r* 1 1 • 1 w w ^ w ^ ' •LENGTH X WIDTH 3 1 r t X 3 # F • •*X S.F. X s S • F • A, Rapag ^3 2---X -f - d.»—.yc’/.y’, S • F • c. Driveway ^ iT X S.F. /2U X A -2^J S 1 F • D. Sidewalk X y s S>, o • r • X S.F. X , S • F • E. P atio / Deck X ryo rr 7^0 S.F. P. L\NDSCAP*^r X j ^S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY X s S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X S.F. X 3 • S.F. i;. Othfb X S.F. • Total Hardcover IN • Zone H H <S • F • Total Property Area in Zone s.F. £ I X 100 » yp N y \ .. I .n •- irf t I ”» fi '1 ■■ :■ - ORDINANCE NO. 96,2nd Sen«s ' AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN INTERIM MORATORIUM ON THE GRANTING OF LAND SUBDIVISIONS THAT HAVE NOT RECEIVED PRELIMINARY ... / ...APPROVAL FROM THE CfTYi' • : Laxe Minnetonka and associated bays and THE CITY OF.ORONO ORDAINS! .»■ ..... ' The Municipal Code of the City ol Orono is amended by addins Ordinance No. 92:2nd Sariaa:. .. --------- All properties within the City of Orono , ^ted within 300 feet or the flood plain of the j lWIowing tributaries; _• „ . r .• Creek (Sections 30. 3i T118N R23W) -------. ■ Bay Creek* (Sections 32. 33 m.SSI R23W and Sections 4.* 5 T117N Creek* (Sections 27. 34 ^V* CII» a, C'MI.-: (s.c^on. • R23W and Sections 3^10 T117N R23W) Lake Creek* (Sections 6. 7 T17N ■ aubdivision of land teiihin 1.000 feet of lakes and 300 feet or'the flood plain of certain tributaries within the limits. The City is in the: process, of studying and preparing comprehensive emendment of Its shoreline regubufons. The City Councfl finds that there is- an ovenwhelming probability that shoreline regulations will need to be updated and revised. The City Councfl also finds that such amendments cannot be accomplished until furtf^ study has besn competed and a R231 hearir^heid. Jnca enactment of such amendments wil undoubtedly modify existing regulations oonoeming subdivision of land, the processing of applieaoons during this interim period would be detrimental to the effectuation of proposed standard amendments and contraiy to the' purpose of the zoning enabling acL Minnesota Statutes 4S^3S1. at seo. The City Councy further finds that it woiM be unwise, improper, and ur^ust to allow individual development to mxur during this soidy period and would allow discriminaiion and unfair advantage to a few 10 the detriment of the entire City. Therefore, the City Council finds it necessary and appropnate to adopt an Interim Ordinance pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 462.355. Subd.4. SECTION. 2. Rflatrjctioni an th* Graniinfl of Subdivision Aijplicananii bn ian/< subdivision applicaiions. except (or those that already have received preliminaiy approval and for a subdivision application of a property governed by a settlement agreement between tne Cities of Long Lake and Orono. shall be granted for any purpose that would be inconsistent with die applications as of the date of adoption of this Ordinance and to any subsequent applications. SECTION IWQ section 4. Duration This ordinance srwl be effective.lor a period of.one year, unless the City Council determines that it is no longer required because the requisite studies have been completed and adopted and that appropriate evaluation and action, including any necessary revisions of. the Zoning Code, have been finalized..The duration of this Ordinance may be extended by adoption of a subsequent ordinance, for a total additional period of eighteen months • • SECTTON 5. Vw(ancag~The City Council may crant a vahanoe to this Ordinance if the City Council finds aftar careful review of all the facts that a proposal is not contrary, to the intent of the Comprehensive Plan, that it is compatible with the zoning and official control amendments being considered by the City, that it promotes the health.'eafety, and welfare ol the citizens, and that a failure to grant a variance would create a hardship for the applicanL SECTION 6. Seoarabililv Every section, provision, or part of this Ordinance is declared separable from every other section, provision, or part and. If any secoon, provision, or part thereof or action taken'hereunder shall be held invalid, it shall not affect any other sec ’on. provisron, or part S^TrTON 7. Effective Dau» Thi< Ordinance is effective upon adoption by the City Council. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on the 26th day of August. 1991, bv a vuM of 4 ayes and 0 nays. . 3. Restricted Area The portion of the City of Orono that shall be subtect to the restrictions of this Ordinance is all the land contained within the area described as follows;' Air properties within the City of Orond locaied within 1,000 feet of the Ordinary High VMiler Mark of the foUowing lakes: ' . -. Lake Katrina ■ - . ATTEST! Dorothy M. Halim, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson. Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The LakeClass«.m Dickeys Lake WolsfeldLake Long Lake LydiardLaka Mooney Lake Hadley Lake Tanager Lake French Lake Forest Lake n I foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day August. 1991. by Barbara A. Peterson and Dorothy M. HalKn. Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono. a Minnesota municipal corporation and said Instrument was oxecuted on behalf of the City. f •*.Notary Public ^ —m ____ V* ^ Laker a/id Pioneer Sept. 2, 1 Affidavit of Put State of Minnesota. County of Bill Holm, being duly sworn, on an authorized agent and empic of the newspaper known as THE nesota. and has full knowledge c stated below; A.) The newspaper has compliec ments constituting qualificatic newspaper, as provided by 331A.02, 331A.07. and other amended. B.) The printed which is attached was cut from newspaper, and was printed and week for ____ / It was first published Monda the day of and was thereafter printe(^l a Monday, to and including Me the day of KJUSn HOLh notary PUBUC - MIN HENNEPIN COU! Ily ooiranisston rntpires Subscribed and sworn to me on day of / / /?/i/ /'/>?IJy 0 n By: / /Dmn .iMteklll Of-/ 4 V; CITY OF OROT.’O SEPTIC SYSTEM APPROVAL LOCATION €J(HS M.- 20, Anf. 203 : ?-^-8 8 SrALf t t"=sc' • 'Vfer I a ■ ? -. /ffei . V '■ Wr: • >?vv t r*.»* t ■»:•«V ;>? V*:v‘‘ •»: f • ' I •- '.r il ^ 4 ■’/C- I I £• A X —■-i.-,.' --1- v-o •pCi 5te^ »« ':fl n. • \«tniiJLOt^i Pdfi.Tl CO 1 -. * I Mr \ -A i535iisit.t!!!i:i •J?--Y' ^ I 1 »«rc d-t t-*>t tj»f. flUL * >Vl:' •.•V .V'l'-Vvv ________■^x<::4 •vi. f • *<H4>i*|il / :v '^Piisk <iJ^r! - wlVio Q^:• . jv c», - r* ^ .... ------ GUARDRA\L-S I • \i^jf i*; OA” MIN. P«^«t *>t o^ NINGS ] —^ V ,|I <vt!<r«W>v.-;•’ ’ o .-^ -.I • '.. / > ••' •. • V . -.rs. jj • /•.;M6Tt^,- -\ ^ "%i.\J‘J I Br~»ROOM WINfiftWS ni»e Exrr moU ired 24“ MIN. ClIeARTg^CTriyT 5.7 80. FT. MIM. OWNING 4^“ MAX SIU. HEIGHT 'I M f*,V %tt >1 •‘^7?. |A/; k- . ^ • •, ^IR€ rmt MOP. fl OV^R 1(^ 4 A rauR iiidt i mi' ____ I COmUS lUE HE iKjfm T IT* /^i/)/Aj fZ6c>ie V V.j J*M't r**.r 4p>?v> ;.• vAi •< 5 < r. • tar *4 f 9 r- s ] ^ —* Urii*--------____ J_ _.._ :i„......_i?i(i_:..._______________ /.S'-Cr : .1 '-r-h-n .g Afltv t 0 4 c»7^ ^ ^ * Aux. i d<Jwv -U3Kt 6<*jr.Fi*Ui • I c. c3*tn. ^ j L » > r *^***-* M/f.4.0 pm IfilT ' ,'J. ^ ^-1-— Tl iL *1 Cftin. c#*»« « — - "■ »- ■I« r'Mdkt. _ . _in *iiii<ii«f |Mi tltOn• v> ii JIT*>^ opMBu^j&< ooTsroe V ^AlR DUCT : ;T<.6or Off-. \ air 'PLENUM . ‘oV /*» • ^rl£2L.JuiUi ;ii—;7-T^ iSl# .:-V V3 •-1V 0/41^' «-v^ 1) T u njiC. • » i __'■;BivttOROw^E'-''‘^‘Ui 'f <r*«n<.*i*;,»rt./6ii/|.^|;, . * «-v^ 1) T U rijt. ^ ■ Unlk'l^- M'NJ^ ■ sQ-f2- X * *\«V^ _11^* ^>r ^ fN»* ?VtT VK i ^E^«l«iijr'<^ .'. - - ... * •• • ♦ • * ' • ‘ . . . ^ y 7^V:i> ‘ ,• . n -1*0 i-- ■ ' '■ ‘'‘.<5, BlOCKIHt ^ '' ■“ “fWill K'HA- V^.min . tread ^ ^min .-n Iaoroo M' . tONENANlk^a REQUIRED RA<t’CttN*SI0£5 VI -I » •• * %'si^IV m Sh At Point 0( Bear er m^.wK^^SNTI1V^^^^°^c-^.V ^'- U wd BI ►' II 8c Snppoited Ulaniv nt Br Solid Blocking j^a^i^eNT^ .J . <JA — w' V i/^'rTO r'~ “\ • ■i.€^\ .■*•,':; :-v -. >f .• v' . .^i./ r-^ ►PROVIDE TREAJ80 Pt^S^T t=^ ft - u^Ai’ O'-' tAfc.. ' i«.oTurt.tL > r ;l . ? »A *•«•»•*• • BotV . iC* I\'< C«M£. A.iK<4 ^#Mt rtU^'l. M%In % -u IT*'- . - - ^ D»^oift. /WA.fiNifc-* rk-iM.-v >!_• ^c. r^. <;i.«#n3 - Df2A.ffi . <1#^ Norcw*. . j. 1^1*1'^ H.V4 IVm.'''*' ’*•-'■ ‘ ■*• B i4'c w»<in.u«ii '* 4^;-------------- i' x.u. ). I ..............-«y r >_9i|'t'*"-' r- - r V Q REC 20” MIN- “L?frK®Eito- «--rrr1«L^’• , I'iSsSL^ai v^via ’jl j I : n-Kfg -1 :.''^ P r. " T n* .V f powers L^veL. • "i- V #» «* % • • ^^••0 1 j MMlilbigMiliailiiMi Cot^ccfr* r»* ‘ f «•ii ¥ * COf^l^CTDR. COh^C^T T# iA] im.1 ©S^v' ----liiih r I iititil Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Moorse From:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning /administrator Date: S'^ject: September 9, 1991 #1683 Robert Suess, 2590 Watertown Road - Preliminaiy Subdivision - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-IB, Single family rural residential, 2 acre, unsewered Application - Request for subdivision of 19.7 acre existing homestead to create two 2-acre building sites List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit J Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey, Proposed Plat Staff Sketches: 1 - Existing Dedicated Road System 2 - Proposed Shared Driveway 3 - Future Cul-de-Sac (Conceptual) 4 - Future Connection to Golden View (Conceptual) Existing House Driveway Options 1989 Air Photo Pertinent Comp Plan/Subdivision Code Excerpts re: Road Development Pertinent Facts - 1. Total Area (Excl. Watertown Rd.)19.7 ac. Proposed Outlot A Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 (existing house) 0.6 ac. 2.0 ac. 2.0 ac. 15.1 ac. 2.Lots 1 and 2 have each been tested for drainfield sites. Both lots require mound systems, and each lot has a suitable building envelope to construct a single family residence. The land is open and relatively flat, hence the sites will need to be protected with fencing during driveway/road/house construction. The existing residence has a septic system that is currently functional, and because Lot 3 contains 15 acres, no alternate sites testing was required at this time. Zoning File #1683 September 9, 1991 Page 2 3.Although neither applicant nor his agent have submitted a letter of request, staff was verbally advised that applicants propose contruction of a shared driveway in Outlot A to serve Lots 1 and 2, and request that the existing residence continue to access directly to Watertown Road. Discussion The proposed configuration is the logical first step in the future development of this property into as many as eight or nine 2 acre lots (see Exhibits E). The configuration would allow for future development of a cul-de-sac, or for a future connecting road to Golden View Drive if that was deemed necessary at the time of future subdivision. Driveway vs. Road To be consistent with Subdivision Code Section 11.33, Subd. 4, this is technically a three-lot plat which would require construction of a 24' wide paved private road and cul-de-sac within Outlot A, serving all three lots. It is staff's understanding that applicant wishes to continue using the existing driveway access to Watertown Road for Lot 3, and construct a shared driveway to serve Lots 1 and 2, rather than construct a fullfledged road and temporary cul-de-sac. In staff's opinion, this requires a variance to the Subdivision Code. If this driveway concept were approved, staff would recommend that Outlor A stay in the ownership of the applicant, with access easements granted to Lots 1 and 2. The City would take an u.iderlying road and utility easement. Covenants would be needed to define the driveway maintenance responsibilities of Lots 1 and 2, and would have to further define what financial obligation vov.ld be incurred by each affected lot at such time that future development occurs. It would have to be stipulated that any new building lots created on the property in the future would trigger upgrade to private road standards. Exhibit P shows the existing driveway location and two possible alternate locations if existing house was required to access directly to Outlot A. From a safety stai.dpoint, the existing driveway is not in a hazardous location. If a variance i:, granted to allow merely a shared driveway serving Lots 1 and 2, the City should require that any future development which would require upgrading of Outlot A to a private road, wculd trigger the relocation of the existing driveway to Outlot A. m.. ,L_ Zoning File #1683 September 9, 1991 Page 3 Other Issues Whether or not Outlot A is allowed to be constructed as merely a driveway, staff would recommend that it be given a street name and lots be assigned addresses such that no address changes would be needed upon future subdivision of the property. Both Lots 1 and 2 would be subject to the Park Fee Ordinance. This subdivision has been submitted to the Public Works Director for review by the Park Coininissionr and the City Engineer for comment. There are no designated wetlands on the property. No site grading or drainage plan has been presented, nor has a topographic survey been submitced. There is a potential for drainage from this project affecting the Hackberry Hill 1/2 acre sewered development to the east. The City Engineer .dvises that a topographic survey should be required now in order to adequately address the drainage concerns as well as a concept plan for the ultimate development of the property. Issues to Resolve 1.Should the existing house be forced to relocate its driveway to Outlot A? 2.Should the applicant be required at this time to construct a 24 foot paved road with 100 foot diameter cul-de-sac? 3. Have drainage concerns been adequately addressed? Staff Reconmendation Given that each lot has sufficient area, width along an Outlot, and orlmary and alternate drain field sites tested, the 2-acre lot standards appear to be met. The Planning Commission must determine whether sufficient justification exists to allow Outlot A to contain merely a private driveway serving two lots at this time, and if so, should determine what threshold of future development would trigger upgrading of that driveway to private road standards. Staff recommends that full topographyof the^ 20-acre parcel and a concept plan and drainage plan be submitted, and the Planning Commission may wish to table pending receipt of that information. r 6*^* ’ Zoning File #1683 September 9f 1991 Page 4 The following conditions of approval should be included in your recommendation once all outstanding issues are resolved: 1. Park fee to be determined per current fee schedule. 2.Standard drainage and utility easements to be taken over entire plat. Drainage plan to be followed per recommendation of City Engineer. 3A. (If driveway only, with no requirement to move existing driveway): a.Outlot A to remain in ownership of developer (owner of Lot 3). b. Access easement shall be granted over Outlot A in favor of Lots 1 and 2. c.Developer shall execute covenants to define responsibility for want of driveway, and to define future financial obligation at such time that the driveway is upgraded to private or public road status. d.Condition of approval is stipulated that any future development of the property that creates additional residential lots including use of Outlot A for access will trigger upgrade of Outlot A to current road standards. e.Developer to grant City an underlying road and utility easement over Outlot A. 3B. If required to do road now, with requirement to relocate existing driveway to Outlot A: a. b. Standard developers agreement required. Outlot A to be shared ownership of homeowners' association, standard covenants required. o •Developer to grant standard underlying road and utility easement over Outlot A; shall be written to not preclude future connection to adjacent properties . i w F ■ Zoning File #1683 September 9# 1991 Page 5 d. 4. Temporary cul-de-sac to be platted and constructed (easement or outlot?). d. pAyMtrwr of cy'»*icTtro Fff’cr. Applicant shall satisfy any Watershed District requirements (applicant advised to contact Minnehaha Creek Watershed District at 473-4224). 5.Protection of drainfield sites via fencing to be in place during road/driveway construction and to remain in place until homes are completed. 6. Dedica:ion of 33' right-of-way for Watertown Road. 7. m Address assignments shall be north-south grid with a new road name even if this is a driveway. t 8.No building permits until driveway/road is completed. 9.No curb cut/access for Lots 1 and 2 onto Watertown Road except via Outlot A. Options for Action 1.Address access issues, table subject to submittal of topographic survey/grading plan/concept plan. 2.Address access issues, recommend approval subject to submittal of topographic/grading/concept plan prior to Council preliminary plat review. 3.Other. , .(« ■!! I Mill I ■■ Illfcril'SlIIB I iKipr I'V CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address J TlTAQy./) ■' \ . •■ o N • * V Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ?7~//S-2J -Oc>Cf^ Please check one - Property X. abstract or - - torrens? Attach legal description to application. _ _ ^ ^ ^ ^ MB MB MB MB MB BM BM BB mm BM ^ BM MB BB MB MB MB APPLICANT Naune TT^T". ///!/JlCT _______________ nr nonunI unvifU f AlinitUiB Ul I AWA* Phone (home) 4^7 7 - <l3'gOgC’(>Ot?<? --------- .yi i£V 150.00 Phone (work) 150.(^ ----- Htitlt'i -1 iiiwr, YOU ...i* # ip Address: 7,2J^.r fr/i^fr city OWNER (if different than applicant) Name <2d Cfi.T SUCSS Phone (home) 7A- Phone (work)_ _ _ _ _ _ Address: Z 5"?^ <2itY'_A^t^£_Jd£L - -Zip: SSJ^ (attach list if more than one) i EXISTING LAND USB Number of Tax Parcels Develooment Size <r_ \. ■ Present Use (check) /9. y2 Acres Dry Land , Acres Wet Land 2.2. Acres Total/'all parcels Residential; no. 'of ^^nits rjJYJjtMQilQ Other (specify)______EimCLM^E 1350200000 01 CEH 290.00 PROPOSAL Present Zoning strict A -/6_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ---------------------------n7r,7ITon ”^or'^I^"pu ”ooses ' REiEIPT-THm YOU--------------- Division .or .ax Pi.^oses Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) oS/23/9 Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites; Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) 2. 3. MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATIC'* Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application." 4. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete.’ Zoning’Official' s Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal'plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. • Ml* • • Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Applicat;ion is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ * Date FEES \ Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III)$150.00 Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement 250.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision)250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and aTr non-residential) 300.00 + 20.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or' requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature Date Date Applicant must have all submittkls into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If a,n applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 1 ; gat/K * \ .^C'lCHA.EN ‘ •"O'?) * 7M t •?] * • «l 1 « «4 J S • ' V t "3» JAA. {'01 *V U ■> • r*» '• w/ .'f X X % \ I »A» w';« VAPl c ( i( » f /7 C ') in» ■n2) “ riX L '^ 'f 1 1t (*nw • I It -t.ii! ^ • 8 liSI Si 8 *• : ^ . 1 :<»>'- 1 *4 /J «S // C 6»f //7 » • ••1« *v‘t ft jvr *1 • «rf • n • C3u»rr:i isiiJE V ,-vt 1* « I H » s - ■ *M A . . >1 ** n ^ 1 .•54 *• ' J. ■■■■ $ -x;^ - 1*: ‘'* •• '• 46 f im • — — TT*' ^ ^ 1 M A ; » ' 7 •< i.. jj _j .5- RUN DATE M/06/91 Ik' •• BATCH 006 PROP ADDR 0»tCR NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP ADDR 0»MER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR OmER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPEhTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OlOCRS LIST SO 04-117-2S 12 0002 02645 NATERT0M4 RO PATRICIA C DICKEY PATRICIA C DICKEY 2645 NATERTOI44 RO LONQ LAKE IM iST56 PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 38 3S-116-2S 41 0016 02525 HOOOHAVEN OR C J O'CONNOR A L S 0*C(MIOR CHRISTOPHER J O'CONNOR AND LYNETTE S O'CONNOR 2525 NOOOHAVEN LONG LAKE MN 55356 SO 33-110-23 42 0014 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 0 D PETERSON A K L PETERSON DONOVAN 0 A KAREN L PETERSON 2715 SILVER VIEH DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 30 33-110-23 43 0009 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED J F A M C P VOGT ET AL , . MIKE HILBELIMC , 1120 E HAYZATA BLVO NAYZATA m 55391 s > ♦ » SO 33-110-23 44 0002 02590 NATERT0F9I RO ROBERT F SUESS ETAL ROBERT F SUESS 2590 S NATERTONN RO LONG LAKE m 55356 30 33-110-23 44 0010 00141 HACKBERRY HILL DAVID P FISCHER ETAL DAVID FISCHER 141 HACKBERRY HILL' LONG LAKE W 55364 I ■; \ J 30 04-117-23 12 0005 02595 COUNTRYSIDE DR PATRICIA C DICKEY PATRICIA C DICKEY 2645 HATERTOFM RO LONG LAKE Ff4 55356 30 33-118-23 41 0017 02485 NOOOHAVEN DR MARK H HOLF MARK H HOLF 2485 HOOOHAVEN DR LONG LAKE FM 55356 38 33-118-23 43 0004 02640 NATERTONN RO T P GORMAN ALT GORMAN T P 1 L T GORMAN 2640 NATERTCPtt RO S LONG LAKE 55356 3B 33-110-23 43 0016 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED LILLIAN B PETERMAN ET At LILLIAN B A ROGER PETERMAN 7820 LAKETO»tl RD NACONIA MN 55387 38 33-118-25 44 0008 00185 HACKBERRY HILL R H PERRY ETAL R H PERRY 185 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE W 55356 38 33-118-23 44 0011 00125 HACKBERRY HILL P A A M L NELSON PHILLIP A NELSON 125 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE 55356 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 10 ■k;.' ■■ ■ V 38 33-118-23 41 0008 02565 HOOOHAVEN DR NAM BASHORE NEAL K A MARY D BASHORE 2565 HOOOHAVEN DRIVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 30 33-118-23 42 0012 02675 SILVER VIEH OR G A C M KIRKPATRICK GRAY A CHRISTINE. KIRKPATRICK 2675 SILVER VIEH OR LONG LAKE W 55356 38 33-118-23 43 0005 00120 GOLDEN VIEH DR JOHN HALLSON JOHN T HALLSON 2056 GRAND AVE S LONG LAKE m 55356 1. 38 33-118-23 44 0001 02590 HATERTOI«l RO ROBERT F SUESS ETAL ROBERT F SUESS 2590 S HATERTOm RD LONG LAKE 194 55356 X 38 33-118-23 44 0009 00155 HACKBERRY HILL PETER IRHIN FOSSEN ETAL MR PETER I FOSSEN 155 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-110-23 44 0012 00109 HACKBERRY HILL KURT C SCrniD KURT C- SCHMID 109 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE >94 55356 km -- - - - - - - - - - - -^ *iTi ■ l■^fmlllr^ if i^- - - - - - -i I'* V . r* •# • \ RUN DATE 06/06/91 * BATCH 006 r pnOP AOOR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP AOOR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP AOOR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR f t r t • ^ r • • t i'HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATIQN SYSTEH PROPERTY ONNERS LIST 38 33*118-23 44 0013 00095 KACKBERRY HILL 0 0 PEASLEY ETAL DUMHEATH PEASLEY 95 HACKBERRY HILL LONQ LAKE HN 55356 38 33-118-23 44 0016 • 00051 HACKBERRY HILL J H HIEUE A R J HIELKE RICHARD J i JANELLE H HIELKE 51 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE m 55356 . 56 S3-118-2S 44 0019 02400 NATERTOMI RO R H HASMAN A J 0 HAOHAN RICHARO M A JUNE 0 HAGHAN 35 HACKBERRY HILL LONB LAKE HN 55356 •33-118-23 41 0010 Johh & Patricia Harris 2445 Woodhaven Drive Long.Lake, MN 55356 33-118-23 41 0003 James Dillman 225 willow Drive Long Lake, MN 55356 33-118-23 44 0005 Lawrence Gleason 140 Hackberry Hill Long Lake, MN 55356 33-118*23 44 0022 ‘ James & Dana Mock 80 Hackberry Hill Logn.Lake, MN 55356 33-118-23 44 0023 Donald Siford 96 Hackberry Hill Long Lake, MN 55356 30 33-118-23 44 0014 00081 HACKBERRY HILL 0 A 0 DALY DANIEL P DALY 81 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 33-118-23 44 0017 00035 HACKBERRY HILL R N HAGHAN ETAL RICHARD H HAGHAN 35 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE HN 55356 TOTAL BATCH 006 OOOZS 33-118-23 44 0024 Thomas Pierce 66 Hackberry Hill Long Lake, MN 55356 33-118-23 44 0025 Charles Autry 50 Hackberry Hill Long Lake, MN 55356 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 19 38 33-118-23 44 0015 00065 HACKBERRY HILL DONALD H DAHL ETAL DONALD H A KAREN S DAHL 65 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE 55356 38 33-118-23 44 0018 00035 HACKBERRY HILL R H HAGHAN ETAL RICHARD H HAGHAN 35 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE Ltl 55356 33-118-23 44 0028 Walter Ellis 2440 Watertown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 33-118-23 44 0026 William Wear 36 Hackberry Hill Long Lake, MN 55356 33-118-23 44 0027 M.iko Ernhart 22 Hackberry Hill Long Lake, MN 55356 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY T4)UkTI0Nk TO THE BEST OF HY KN0HLED6E AND BELIEF DAT EPARTMENT OF PROPERTY T^TION,^ TO t*■*>? I Af 1 . *• V** I : 'J IJJ . 1 t r V C3 ^ /gT) ^ !l , il a ♦ -S' •• •» •* ?# V.**. U.“. W*Vi*-''-■ :s-/ vS'• • .»» u •*% 1 fill «.. . i i -T^■ ■ 11 \ i ♦•t w * I ; ' p •• !o ' a . £!j"i:mg’c>< •i «rA. m —•Ik* u«—< ::1 g,,..C< a' ACSgp {•/I (fi]) MW .4^ VC!C^-VcN « • rsriift ♦• -' ^15?' ^ w • • j (aT?) 2 J (>«l ( II t»0 *,••**1 o» IMM *5 ” ; < SI e^;- «• '•>I ,l i mrmwn fk ________ •• t» ?€TiaaAii ^ 11**1 dij) I > AM*' 1 5 • diP ,‘M — " SlCZlt A009I •«. m 5 • « (IP •1 (111 • V • « 1 dP s 1 i lltl 'W w OP J - j.<»-<'' .« _________I___________ ,*.‘i@ t »» ir tj) & * < 1 * i 1 «' -a i«» ’ , -* £s^ * . »i * i* l Ml ’ 1 <:,P^ » C*..f5)« * wi”®’ , S,(S>. '■ . O M * • ^ «y» * k (iil » • -t > ; '• \v. ^ I ; > • ** -»Wi * II *; vii ■ . I J « ' I ■ ,4^ r .1 • I » •• I • A U ,k ,m V/H ri I (Ul T ‘J'*' .cS>. [T^gS Ail.. . !s=\y yg- ilS ^awT^t• s- «• !•a I « ttLM f * • I I • ‘ tf *cf L^' • ' * ». - v»:~l L .*U M «is . ^^44 ) STC.ni S£#€?^ DISTRICT 3CUKAAT ---------------- school district 30U.NUART ........................... •A:£Ri>-€0 DISTRICT aOWCART •»;/*9C fc» * ?•• *'Nj8* ---- - - ^— S33 tOitf'.H CW*fir. Ml*#<S0r* 0u«i»j or IU8LtC jflvlCE CF.P»/IIk€Nr OF PPOPflTr r*. i^o p'ja.10 »r of:' L.-iriiftt^srfnkr^MAUL . . ^ ^ (cj fB)U , !J H tri, d4 r> f* • ^ *^ *?> u. ;*j * V i’ y:. .•^ • ” I : • » ■ f • •C*f tCI 5ICWJ s£*f^ jisrstci acwc*«» sCrca jisiaict 30(/«*«t JISJRIcr 3XNC*3y CCUNIY. yi.v^SOfA 5lrt»C*o '>■ ^tJflUC f!pPA«Ti<Nr Of »>«0P€«TT TAt I.v'^ ^V\IC o«us (JJ f. //<f M.• t >A -< u.:-»;;; -/V a \ .tJi t/ (‘41: I |0) t » 9 *• 1 ^ » ^ ^ %* «9 I I li •• t iSl • BURL -I»<G7CN J.Y- — CHf.— :, 6P ir* "‘]L 5 • ; ft i 3.VV:C5 1 M i'^» ; (S> • I 1 l>'Z 1 11 • * 1 n «i M m 4 V H w ,©. ,1 «1 IJ (S> .,3 ..(S> * IWI ' M ifAs, ^ ‘ iniai<, <3>. ^ 111! ' ^ iJ ^.jn ^..l«;■■ ‘ r **% ------------• (§).tU M HI *% h ^ -r -V S33 !—*»•! ' • • ^ lU -It- STC«M <£<R district 9CUN0ART SJOOl district 301M)aRt •*r£R^,><£a district sx ^jary : *1 «-A«0«■«c»v. *<f#€PlN CCUifT. a:f#<SDl 0uM€Au or Ptiaic sfRvicE CfPAflTKHf OF PROP€RTy r* IC •f CRCS Af kB ,'A^.k .- . JJ f. 'm f.•» -3)y '1 f A i * • nm 0/1^1 ' t L—• - 6 URLIrtG7G.N 7^ 3> - *k^. ui# — » . (21? , ’ S.»SWi = 11 -1 '2* ('ll 1 i i •« i t. • •• ft)) MW » • .^.•si a3SV .009‘’^ _C^ <J5?> ^ ^ »«jv • “;nr ^CCCHAVtN OR <. ■ (srivc« (25) 2 I ' €5) jj*t ni* r«i”f»« as1 ^ w^ — ' *n«> L*l* rEn»iAii 1 ,• (SP sscom " aoox (III i*.i (S> ' m (03 : a "k'-Jlf l-fi J- (£5) ' 77 ♦ .V N \ \ (^- ' t» \ • ag III " i 'Ll-r'Ss;-: ',^r z 1 !V(E) I;^0 , m.<2>. r « * .«i - /’» — 4^ ■k »•.; j m ;i i i i 3 . = III »'.>1 a In . I (All m 0 • » « miu its S 33 «<M »«l (IL .VL.LX ««««««« STCHW iiftlR OiSTfilCT 0CW4)Ai«r .SOiOOt DISTi^lCT aCUN)MT .................. *Ar-^>£. otSMtcr axNOAHT ....................................... »V'*5C* i-. r S'*,.,^14* Ht>#€PtN CCUNfT. Wif4NCS0r euH€Au Of PuaiC 5£.^V|C£ DPPAnu^NC Of nonat^ ta* 4M) p^aic pf idTIiiil I 1^ ■- ilim...... :....................... ••- r.V ->V T H '!/» pA tm-fft(* •1 r 1 0^ tOT2 I LOTI t0*mt*mt W , • 1 i ; 1 w ^ 0 1 1*^'104 • QUTLQT A ’5T7 *k..‘ ; I • t ^//S77AJ6. i*-»»<K-- •0 r 1 \1 #•LOT 2 LOT 1 0» < «1 mt— } ;:11 •s 1 1 ________ \_________ 4t ,"t • r OUTLOT**A i. L _;>_\ \ > *' V"‘ rfA ir;v.LVr;. t*fc ft* <<« «’ W h •• «f > 'r,7 'mm-* ^',il*'-l?l!U' i'-' t# # 'TC^ ^PUTU>T /I 'll m M m > wm transportation JUNE, 1980 TUP TRAN,^POPTAT!ON plan Orono's location on the perimeter of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area ind cLmercial centers, and for efficient commuter movement away from the congested, environmentally sensitive lakeshore. The principle components of Orono's Transportation Plan are as follows: 1 DEVELOPING THE RING ROUTE CONCEPT including designation of collectors and^minor arterials to direct traffic away from Lake Mrnnetonka. 2.developing the scenic parkway concept including designation of pal^wayfforslow-speed recreational access along the Lake Mxnnetonka shoreline and other scenically attractive routes. 3.DEVELOPING THE PRIVATE ROAD CONCEPT for access to low density rural residential properties. 4.PROMOTING REASONABLE LEVELS OF PUBLIC bus URBAN NEIGHBORHOODS including maintenance of the existing . - routes and investigation of alternative public transit modes for commuter travel to the center of the Twin Cities region. ORONQ^S ROADWAY ClASSIFIC ATION SYSTEM A commonly accepted way to describe is through a classification system which follows fitf^rvicGs and different levels of construction standards. This Plan thrcnsst?tc«fon system developed and adopted by the Minnesota Department Of Transportation as applied to the types of roadways serving Orono. MAP NO. 14 INDICATES THE CLASSIFICATION PLAN FOR STREETS ROADS IN ORONO. This plan is consistent with the regional transportation and facilities of the Metropolitan Council, the Minnesota Transportation and the Hennepin County Department of "'.sftiPS Jh^^pJan inconsistent with the roadway systems of adjoining I^^w^tS oiono's urban and rural land use plans. The ^ provin detailed explanations of each of Orono-s roadway classifications. CMP 7-14 XB_an <^poRTATIOM JUNE, 1980 PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL A Principal Arterial is a grade-separated, high capacity, controlled access highway designed to nove vehicles through an area, not within a community. Principal arterials have no local land use access. The only principal arterial near Orono is that portion of State Highway 12 that becomes limited-access east of Orono's eastern boundary with Wayzata. INTERMEDIATE ARTERIAL An Intermediate Arterial is a controlled-access, moderately high capacity highway designed to move vehicles between cities and, in Orono's situation, between the free-standing growth centers and state cities west of Orono into the metropolitan area. Intersections are limited and controlled. Land use access is intended to be limited to major traffic generators without direct access to residential properties. State Highway 12 is an Intermediate Arterial through Orono although many access and intersection characteristics are typical of a minor arterial or collector. •- JURISDICTION: STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH: MINIMUM 100 FEET FOR TWO LANE HIGHWAY MINOR ARTERIAL A Minor Arterial is a controlled access, moderate capacity street or highway designed to move vehicles within planning subregions and between adjacent subregions. The Lake Minnetonka Ring Route is a minor arterial functioning to move, principally commuters and truck traffic, from the western Lake .Minnetonka communities into the urbanized areas of the Twin Cities. The minor arterial route channels traffic away from Lake Minnetonka to State Highways 12 and 55, and in the near future, to a direct intersection with Interstate 494 in Plymouth. Land use access is intended to be limited to major traffic generators and local !' interse.:tions without direct access to individual residences. KC' JURISDICTION: HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ¥ i/ RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH: MINIMUM 80 FEET FOR TWO LANE HIGHWAY COLLECTOR_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Collector street functions to collect traffic from local streets and move it to neighborhood activity centers or to intersections with minor or intermediate arterials. Local land use access is permitted but is regulated as to location and number with direct access to be is available. Intersectionavoided whenever alternative local street access with other collectors are ot~ten controlled with signals or with four-way stop signs. Traffic usage is moderate. j - JURISDICTION: COUNTY OR CITY I . RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH: 60-66 FEET CMP 7-15 tpan.^PORTATION JUNE, 1980 SCENIC PAKKWM scenic = Ch:ta by the Citae—of “renvironLotallC significant roads which traverse especially scenic .^„i_allv a na-row, curvy, slow areas of the City. The scenic special vistas speed road which provides access to traffic and commercial traffic of scenic TarK^ys b:rause 0';:^ users do not benefit is not appropriate on scenic p . ^ . r-al nature of the roadway is not “°d cive'treMicien^ through traffic movement. Because of environmental ieHsitivity. scenic parkways jL^lUrfh^natuLl ':ii?nr"hrs«nn ruriI“^of“ibrr:af::a“r'tb; property rights of rbut;i^^ landowners. Because of the JL!! 12-““ ' scenic parkways also provide some ot the trat-ic functions of both local and collector streets. JURISDICTION: COUNTY OR CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH: 50-66 FEET to"b:ttLi“rop:r:i^s"^L ::c?jrs‘’wUh c:^J:ct:r"trenr«"c;;t:oneT^; stopping the local street traffic. JURISDICTION: CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH: 50-60 FEET DEAD-END: LENGTH WILL BE LIMITED BY PUBLIC SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS JURISDICTION: HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION WITH OHDERLTING EASEMENT TO CITY MAXIMUM SERVICE: APPROXIMATELY TEN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH: 30-50 FEET DEPENDING UPON NUMBER OF USERS dead-end: length WILL BE LIMITED BY PUBLIC SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS Ik CM? 7-16 I I I I i i I I I f I I • .w a Torivatelv owned and privately maintained ij -e^rrar: £/r ---^--p^-re :r.n^:rc:L»i:::^ :'rrairtrin:d -ci vjtandards The city wiii^^^^^^_ srij: "trriH-if:: ?bfj:oj:?:r::nj : j /f^tmai^use ^t. lilt ‘b: fo:at:r:;“irtterru:i:» n?enLd for iomt-and several ownership by all the benefitted property owners. E I 1 I I f f r TRANSPORTATION JUNE, 1980 PRIVATE DRIVEWAY A driveway is a privately owned and privately nainttaine vehicle path between the street and private property. Private driveways shall be subject to access pernits according to the classification of the abutting street. Private driveways will not be subject to any public easement or access right, but do require recorded private easements where driveways cross an intervening private lot between the residence served and the street. JURISDICTION: PROPERTY OWNER MAXIMUM SERVICE:1 RESIDENCE TYPICAL; JOINT DRIVEWAYS ALLOWED WITH MAXIMUM THREE RESIDENTS PER DRIVEWAY IN RURAL AREAS MORE USERS REQUIRE PRIVATE ROAD STANDARDS DRIVEWAY WIDTH WILL BE REGULATED WHERE MORE THAN ONE USER IS INVOLVED OR FOR PUBLIC SAFETY PURPOSES WHERE THERE IS EXCESSIVE LENGTH BETWEEN THE RESIDENCE AND THE PUBLIC ROAD EXISTING ROADWAY MAINTENANCE JURISDICTIONS ARE REASONABLE AS THEY RELATE TO THE CLASSIFICATION PLAN. The State of Minnesota has appropriate jurisdiction over the only Intermediate Arterial in the City. The Hennepin County Department of Transportation has jurisdiction over the only Minor Arterial designated in the Plan. It is anticipated that Hennepin County will assume jurisdiction in the future over the City- built ring route link between County Road 19 and County Road 6. Hennepin County has jurisdiction over most of the designated Scenic Parkways which is appropriate in that these roads serve as access to Lake Minnetonka and to County maintained landings for many County residents who do not reside in Orono. The City has jurisdiction over those Scenic Parkways that are away from the immediate lakeshore, including the access road to the Orono Golf Course. The City has appropriate jurisdiction of most of the Collector and all of the local streets which serve all Orono residents. Certain key street segments have been designated for Municipal State Aid construction assistance, including: OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD from County Road 6 to Fox Street, County Road 04 WILLOW DRIVE from County Road 6 to State Highway 12 and from the Long Lake border to Fox Street FOX STREET from Willow Drive to County Road 146 .McCulley Road (Ring Route link) between County Road 6 and County Road 19 Finally, individual property owners have appropriate private jurisdiction over those Private Roads serving only their individual properties. !) i^.jj (2) percent i-» fu 1 ts^ 1 on W1.X2. invoxv0 02JTwnS. Vihere any au.ee. _______ shill® ott"'s®uch''ground to' th;®lltell lllmed ne°=lslarNy'thl ”4""= provide an Ideq.ats sight distance. F, The crown of all streets, including intersections, shall be three percent (3%) or less. Subd 4. Typical section. The typical^section indicated aon)'"anl ^ay'b^subje^/to Change. '"o^Tb^rfnls ^aV be'^^quired to be determined by the City. Private Street ~ Re.s_idential Section 3" Class 5 100% crushed 3" 2341 Bituminous Surface Over 7 SO'23'8” Class 5 100% crushed 3" 2341 Bituminous Surface pnhiir! Street - Residential Units 3-10 R.O.W.* 50' M.P.W.** 23' Sec 8'' 3" Over 10 50'32'8" 3" Maximum Maximum cul-de-sac length - 1,000' number of units on cul-de-sac - 10 •w j w— —- - - - - 2341 Bituminous Surtace Section 8** GX3SS 4 3" Class 5 100% crushed 4" 2341 Bituminous surface * Right-Of-Way Width ** Minimum Paved Width ORONO CC 462 (4-1-34) 5 11.33 Functional Class Private Street- "(residential) Public Street- (residential) Public Street- (com. & ind.) Herizonta 1 and Vertical Control. Design S oeed 30 MPH Vertical Control Horizontal^Control M;»xinurn Gradient _Mininun Haoius— 12% 2/5 ' 30 M.PH 10% 40 MPH 8% -0°' Source: City Code Effective Data: .*-1-3h i4 through 11.39, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.) ORONO CC 463 (4-1-34) 1^^ \7/<- 'itjf #.3'^1lf^iaSifef5rp'. i?®®’ i tcit AVc?8 «. ? -i"' • i « -3 7 • :; #. iA «• V>• f ac® a*» ■ ' - <JjV w • / :-r- Mm fe»v. Sfc ...•:? ?- • -«i • 4 *« V fi ' ■;'■' i V I ta i ? 1 0 I 4r^'. f' * rii^'''' It s < ^ '* * ^ '*'59 l&’ij. ■ Ji /-. ^ sr^^'-i. -«- X. V' O- -a isV.’ '.■••• • •» r<»4| #. , ^ •'“/* '»•••' fc • t M j.. *' ,4 “^r. r. V ! \9B jr, f 4«f «r, ♦ -jqt pM►’ii. T. R *7^ 1 ^ •CJ)-, ' •' tfi- - •'' n 19 i$i< , • V - ^ • s ■• 4'.*•• v%Km _ 3 1 »•? . = , (6) S :?o r4in (i^j R Vv i ^:n rr: '• '*4^- * -Wk.|^M««ka « • # :«% • ,»* -» 4V»r.^ .■ . •k;\".'I'V ifrrfTfr'-:<\ ■:'^ *♦.*.r & ^ vTz *'• V • ' <j ^V • •• • ^'r7*'i .:r:‘i■fn-«% • • • <1 • A •• ^. * mM -9#»^ * ^ .4 > /- »- ^ ^ • V * i5 . vfliV^■?655.»‘Aesi,.--*- tr * ^r:> . 4ik.l ». ^,0A .«■«§-'? .. ^ • * I., (m'^. iEi;WR®AiJf' To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning s Zoning Administrator Date: Subject September 9, 1991 #1608 James Kartzell, 2987 Casco Point Road Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing List of Exhibits A - Revised Calculations B - Revised Pool Plan C - Staff Sketch/ Revised Hardcover Plan D - Lot Coverage Ordinance E - Notice of Planning Commission Action 8/20/91 F - Memo & Exhibits of 8/8/91 Discussion This item was tabled at your August meeting in order for the applicant to develop a revised proposal to limit the degree of hardcover increase. In the 75-250' zone, applicant originally proposed increases from 23.8% to 35.9%. The revised proposal reduces that increase to 27.3%. 75-250' hardcover Existing 23.4%* Original Proposal 35.9% Revised Proposal 27.3% *Staff had originally listed this as 23.8%; applicant has re-measured sidewalks resulting in this correction. In comparing the current proposal with the original request, the following changes are apparent: - patios around pool have decreased from 1428 s.f. to 1050 s.f. - lineal feet of timber walls has been reduced - steps and walkways have been minimized - the 930 s.f. of gravel driveway in the 75-250' zone will be eliminated - the rock and plastic along the side of the house will be removed - if required, the water tower can be removed although it has some grass growing beneath it, and accounts for less than 1/2 of 1% hardcover. If the tower remains, the final 75-250' hardcover would be 27.8%. Zoning File #1608 September 9, 1991 Page 2 Applicant's lot coverage calculation suggests that the intent is to keep the combination of retaining wall and ornamental fence lower than the 6* height at which the enclosed area would be considered as lot coverage. Under this proposal, the sod areas outside the pool patios would not be considered in lot coverage, yielding a final lot coverage of 13.1% under this interpretation . Note that the Building Inspector has determined that because the patio is not continuous to the retaining wall, a fence above the wall is not strictly required even though the top of the wall is as much as 3 1/2' above grade. He wou^d, however, encourage the use of plantings as a safety barrier. Staff Recommendation Under the revised proposal, based on the conditions and interpretations noted above, applicant requests the following: A.Hardcover variance to allow 27.3% (27.8% with tower) in 75-250' zone. B. Average setback variance of 25'. C. No lot coverage variance necessary. If Planning Commission feels the requested variances are justified and supported by adequate hardships, then a recommendation for approval would be in order. Options for recommendation include: 1. 2. 3. 4. Recommend approval as revised. Recommend partial approval, specifying limitations. Send on to Council, or request further revisions be brought back for review. Denial. Other. Isv indlMillill rr^ d \^'4 diC^vcir — 4^2^ -23.b7- CLC(_<U'.v:ic::|l’ iK /<:i\e_2- c^vd-f v<l I j j nc^su rci:. a s 0'^ ST' 6i«^ litjii.F) fkw Utjc^vel--A^-^ ^23.47. 'fj.ol'i <!-<C-ts (i'84-5 5 J.,tl oM-. 10 ^0 5 r. 'TiwW K<5£^ T^p. I I t .w«<« <«C crXN'i)J 'SEP '6 m' If' t3 6/44 sf « diet^ will IK 2- -430 5.5. bvJl iiv^-i H , . «,^0illvCh' ‘^3 |J 5'.:_i^ - -frn^ co\jeX' ;td2 U JUaS<, ■" 2-<>2.'2- ^5 - If- If -T^vve-K- - '^• pP-t- - If.f. ,s. 0” •/. .|U pc 6 - (^£4 S.P. hwWP^'i^^ ^ %'C?t Pf'. t triJ\ \1" r> V »*» f<^V2 7511.5. (ftwuA-o.,1^-7^) flsPct?! i>^i|l U: he i'‘*7 iiecU fc P/Z/beDCov/o^.v . ■■ '• •■ri. . 7s■-^5t)' .•• ■ I , f,P(RoPoiet^ wwr r jLruni cne Aine wr.en saia oocrs race on a yuoiic axiey o street. C€^ Subd. 14. Yards and Open Spaces. A. Reduction Prohibited. No yard or other ocen space shall be reduced in area or dimensions so as to make such yard or other open space less than the minimum required by the Zoning Chapter and if the existing yard or other open space as existing is less than the minimum required, it shall not be further reduced. B. Application to Only One Dwelling or Group. No required yard or other open space allocated to a building or dwelling group shall be used to satisfy yard, other open spaces, or minimum lot area requirements for any other building or dwelling group. C. Lot coverage. In all zoning district^;. Tor all lots of 0-1.99 acre in total area, the total combined footprint areas of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 15% of the lot area. The following shall be included in calculation of lot coverage by structures: 1. All roofed structures which extend more than 6' above grade level. 2. Tennis courts, patios, decks, and all similar "open" structures when partially or fully enclosed by fences, railings or walls which extend more than 6' above grade level (if any portion of such structures extends more than 6' above grade level, the entire structure shall count toward lot coverage). 3. Pools, including pool basin and associated deck or patio areas, regardless of whether such pool basin, deck, or patio is enclosed with a fence. § 10.03 EXCEPTION. Regardless of lot area, every developed lot shall be allowed at least 1,500 square feet of lot coverage by princip residence and garage structures. D. Tennis courts, pools and paddocks or arenas, when such accessory structures exceed 1,000 s.f. footprint are , shall be subject to the following special setback restrictions: ^''°"^;tween"’V'he"’“frort‘^ l”o°t Un\^‘and"'^the''rrln^^^^^ on the property Side - 30* minimum and not within the required side yard area Rear - 30* minimum and not within the required rear ^^rd area Source: Ordinance 72, 2nd Series 8-14-09 Subd. 15. Non-Encroachments. The following shall not be considered to be encroachments on yard requirements; than 1-1/2 f«t, off-street parkin, except as hereinafter regulated. name plate signs for one family dwellings; liahts for illuminating parking areas, loading areas or yar ® l;d. security Furpu^es, F.^rWed the 1 ] 1 CITY OP ORONO P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, NN 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1608 55323 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice: 8/20/91 TO:James Hartzell COPIES TO: David Hoyt 127 Woodlawn Dundee Nursery St. Paul, MN 55105 1608 Highway 55 Plymouth, MN 55446 TYPE OP APPLICATION: Variance DATE OP MEETING: 8/19/91 Planning Connnission recommends the following Tabled for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: VOTE: 6 For 0 Against Acplicant to submit revised design, limiting hardcover as much is possible (no specific direction as to a "goal" percentage was given). Applicant’s next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the September 16 meeting is September 6, or October 11 for the October 21 meeting. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. Isv 16^ To;Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Crono Planning Commission Members Acting City Administrator Gerhardson From:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator Date:August 8, 1991 Subject: #1608 James Hartzell, 2987 Casco Point Road Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District; LR-IC, Single family lakeshore residential, 1/2 acre, sewered Description of Request: Requesting lot coverage and average setback variances (hardcover variance also required) to construct swimming pod and patio. Pertinent Ordinances 1. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 Existing = 23.8% Proposed = 35.9% Allowed = 25% - Hardcover. (75-250' zone) 2.Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Average lakeshore setback - Proposing 25* encroachment past average setback line where no encroachment is normally allowed. 3.Section 10.03, Existing = Proposed = Allowed = Subdivision 8.3% 15.7% 15% 14 (C) - Lot coverage. Applicant's Statement of Hardship and Unusual Property Conditions 1, Pool area encroaches average setback line because neighboring homes are sited far from lakeshore. 2.All homes along shore are set far off lakeshore and distanced considerably from where pool would sit. Pool would not have negative visual impact on these neighbors. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Neighboring Property Owner's Letter of Support Survey Site Plan, Existing Site Plan, Proposed Applicant's Hardcover and Lot Coverage Calculations Staff Review of Hardcover and Lot Coverage Plan View, Proposed Pool and Patio/Landscape Areas Sketch, Average Setback Zoning File #1608 August 8, 1991 Page 2 of 3 Discussion The survey indicates that applicants own the adjacent residence to the south (3005 Casco Point Road)/ on a separate riparian lakeshore tax parcel. They also own the non-riparian lot upon which the tennis court sits. These two extraneous lots, because they are separate tax parcels, have not been included in the hardcover calculations. The hardcover review and site inspection by staff determined that applicants submitted hardcover worksheet had omitted significant areas of driveway, sidewalk, and the water surface area of the pool (this application was submitted in January, prior to the pool hardcover policy revision by Council). Existing 75-250' hardcover is 23.8%. Proposed hardcover without removals is 35.9%. The existing driveway serving applicant's property is fairly large, however, that driveway serves both of applicant's residences, and is mostly located in the 250-500' zone. Other than driveway areas, there is very little nonstructura 1 hardcover which can be removed to compensate for the hardcover excesses. The average setback encroachment of 25' is defined by the neighboring adjacent houses, one of which is owned by applicant. The top of the fence surrounding the pool will be approximately 7' above existing grade at a distance approximately 40' lakeward of the existing deck. The neighboring residence to the north is offset approximately 140' from the proposed pool and is relatively high in elevation compared to the pool. The applicant's house at 3005 Casco Point Road, has some lakeviews across the pool area already partially screened by existing trees and vegetation. Lot coverage will be slightly over the 15% limit when the pool is included in the calculation. Issues to Consider 1.Will any neighboring properties have their existing views of the lake negatively impacted by construction of this pool/patio/retaining wall system? Is there sufficient hardship shown to justify approval of the proposed 25' average setback encroachment? (The pool will be 105' from the shoreline at its closest point). 2.Are there any potential structural removals or reductions which could keep this property within the 15% limit? Is there sufficient hardship to grant a variance for lot coverage? Zoning File #1608 August 12, 1991 Page 3 of 3 'I- 3.Are there existing hardcover areas on the property which can be reduced or eliminated to compensate for the proposed hardcover excess? Is the fact that a single driveway and parking area serves two properties, with most of the hardcover on the lot with proposed pool, a potential justification for granting a variance? Are there other justifications for granting a hardcover variance, or a partial hardcover variance? Recomnendation Options 1. Recommend approval as proposed 2. 4. '■ t * .♦»: Partial approval, specify limitations, or table for review of revised plan. Send on to Council, 3. Denial. Other. 1. iK irr» •-rJn ■ - ''i CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION / ? ftcat Initial Application Fe<^175.00^ ($50.00 per each additT?5nar"v^iance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 j j (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) •%. * . - •.? -WU PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 2. ji'' W - W - . . • N V c* J. W- » Ji i %» • W • tu '■ i ' t.« r «.' • « V iS^L im if itifI i/ii ;.----r i rr-' ^ / .• *'— •. v'v i *^v a / A - Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)- //7- 2.? 2,^',• • . . • • .LX/ •mtm'* • Attach legal description to application if not included on , required survey. APPLICANT Name Phone (home) ^ ~ ^ ? Address: _ _ _ _ _ __ Phone (work) fZl A.’ City: S7 _ _ _ Zip: r'T ' ^ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone (work) Addr*ess:Citv:Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) -r—. .T U.X / : i-! — -- X kXt V- ■ *“/* *.. J-..:-V vv vv « rfV I^do)) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. ' • > 1 ry< .Vj PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District _ _ _ ___ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Use of Property __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f * /X.V iy•i? m r.- V» V • vv (Residentia^li.V r’Ci; Orher (specify) Z,|“>~'rv iv''l "I'i ' * .• T • r - - -W.*/ . DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ ^jooo pgolt ifj<v(P Describe request in detail: j^l La. nPd^ --y _ _ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) Other I**.* ’ HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from stric enforcement of zoning recrulations <-rffyk-It lia.>-s -UV -^m\'-rwn\ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP DNUSDAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning. Code Requirements: <^0 liuuc^^r. to'. /r T- "-r-T -rrc^ I'iV:’! *2. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete Initialed by Clerical Staff _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date /t in- /V9ci- O-KKHS The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga— • ^ 9 * RUN DATE 12/10/90 BATCH 001 PROP ADDR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR M “ ‘ i i'; • HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OHNERS LIST 38 20-117-23 31 0038 02990 CASCO POINT RD D A J HORRIS BRADLEY C BAKKE 2990 CASCO POINT RD . HAYZATA HN 55391 •f 38 20-117-23 31 0064 02967 CASCO POINT RD TAD ROZEBOOH THEODORE A DEBORAH ROZEBOOH 2967 CASCO PT RD HAYZATA HN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0020 03020 CASCO POINT RD JOSEPH E BRAUN ET AL . CAROL J KELLY 3020 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA m 55391 TOTAL BATCH 001 00009 J ■■ 1 '5 t •( A 38 20-117-23 31 0045 02975 CASCO POINT RD STEHART R PERRY STEHART R PERRY 2975 CASCO POINT ROAD HAYZATA HN 55391 38 20-117-23 3r 00;0 00038 ADDRESS JAMES R A CATHERINf % JAMES R I CATHERINE HARl^tLL 127 NOODLAHN AVE ST PAUL HN 55105 38 20-117-23 34 0023 02987 CASCO POINT RD JAMES R A CATHERINE HARTZELL JAMES R A CATHERINE HARTZELL 127 NOODLAHN AVE ST PAUL MN 551D5 W REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 1 38 20-117-23 31 0061 02980 CASCO POINT RD C N HAACK A P MULLEN HAACK C H HAACK A P MULLEN HAACK 2980 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0003 03015 CASCO POINT RD R G LAURIE ETAL R G LAURIE 3015 CASCO PT RD HAYZATA HN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0024 03005 CASCO POINT RD JAMES R A CATHERINE HARTZELL JAMES R A CATHERINE HARTZELL 127 NOODLAHN AVE ST PAUL MN 55105 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF HY KrKMLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE Mm . - V- I ^It m 1 Perry, Perry & Perry A ttorneys at Law Stewart R, Perry Shawn M. Perry SHA.NE C. Perry N orwf ^t Bank Blilding 900 East Wavz .\ta Blvd ., Slite 110 Wayzata , .Minnesota 55391 Telethone : (612) 473-0130 FAX: <612)473-0184 September 22, 1990 ? / / Srt - J Mr. Jim Hartzell 2987 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 JJ -O Dear Jim: You explained to me that the City requires a letter from your abutting neighbors giving permission to build a swimming pool off of your back deck. I understand that the pool will extend beyond the line of my house towards the lake and that is why the letter is necessary. You stated it was to be a ground level pool. You have my permission to proceed as you wish. You may use this letter in any way as you see fit. If this is not sufficient, please let me know. I will certainly cooperate can. i 4 L .'». I. - ■ ' • 'i* !,€,•• (L, v/o -P o'ii cs «><t.e>cs » • ^ A vy T^v . • ' 8- ^ IO| % J 0-'”''VfoTo'ytP^. lr(if O ^ ^/l,eDcol/aJ ^ ns-7.sD'„ ’9.: * • ’•# • . .I fh -T/^J ^xisr/A)(* V ■ ^ V. • m ^ A • • « ' . • ^ ) : ' If • •* * »— L^. 7^'-^ f(eoP0iet^ S\Te?5CAN ^ I ^ HARDCQVI:.-^ CALCULATIOn HGRKSHEE: ScT3Ac:< ZONE: (circle one) 0-7E' 7:-250’'j 250-*^'-' Existing Hardcover in Zone SCG-ICCO' ./ J V A. House S.F. LENGTH width X S.F. O S.F. 3 X 100 To Y -r ■ <7'L o' f ^ *S.F. ... X S • r • 3.Garage x S • r • ! c.Driveway x 1 S.F. [ X S.F. i T ¥ D.Sidewalk x S.F. *. i X S.F. \ 1 X s f %S t F • < f E.^ATIo/Deck • * * X S • r i I f ; F.Landscape . x .S.F. h1 AREAS UNDERLAIN BY X S.F. i i PLASTIC SHEETING X =3 S.F. i i X S3 S.F. j 1 ^ \ r,r, 6. Other ^ x SB 'Vr S.F. i ■j •• V • • Total Hardcover in Zone 1,S.F.A ; Total Property Area in Zone S.F.B i UkilAla iitiiiiiiimiiiiii psr ¥ HARDCOVER CALCUUTION WORKSHEET SST3ACX ZONE: (.CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 25G-5'00^ 5CC-1CG0' Existing Haf.dcove?. in Zone PH, • Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone S.F. S.F.B X 100 2±£\% A House X ^ • S • r • LENGTH • • WIDTH _ X S!S • r i X S • ? • m 0 •X S • F • » X S.F. 3. • Garage X S • r • C.Driveway i'^X 3 n :S.F. U' X a S.F. 0. • 1 1 / ^ SI dewalk V X &o S.F. X S.F. . X _S • F c E.^atio/Deck X ••f S.F. F.Landscape X • - S • F • AREAS underlain BY X 3 S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X • • S.F. • X S.F. •% G. Other X . .. S.F. A -i ■ i r«ukWJaWaattk4ilft2AMMnT^«ASMaiA>>. Im iiiKi - rr^ ■ ' hf‘ L ut He Hi / y -' > - *• ' -^'^IC<J^ Wi-l.pr. / l\ £ i W ^ /■lZd~ Oi^* frJ - n SI P l^Ui’ - T ?..1 ^>S .Jf • t IhC f S'-.tt- ?-o^3. ^ ^ic ^ 1? n '^ y I o —/9.V7= tr*. * t V \ Vf :v«• 1 iyu II \ii\w liimiHinrti m iiiiftiiirtiiiift1^ • • F \ \ •i :jV/?/rDCoVt>e. f2ev/€T-0, “Z/l S7 CA^co ^r~.rZ-^. •;i 7S- Z«TO /i'', :3 1.-k ■ ifH ■ -I ■'■'I ■ ;t: . •••At %V :4-. H * ► r \f ir :{* ■ if Jif.- ’ ' &‘ YiHvr •i*v| ■1- • . ^22^ si ,2-° 2 2-... i^TD : 920 .,. T?u^v«.S>0 ; Cont^ oofcM'-*■^1* ’'*■’•0 • > « 9* • • ................. “7/P_ ... 3>(?“Cfu: 7) oy /u yso CjAMlC. /2/2.V .PS ............VV^CS ::j?..- -r C r*i«J3<’ccri:> M-A-i-CiCoye*^ ’. • • £?(/ST7/^JG^rr.T . ------------ poo^ n^3c-^SV jX . ... CoAic, Patio « ('27 x/cJ) -68V ms 2.3C^ (f. x.r //s.•V.-C-. s-rrp V > <■//6, AiitTL c->At,fcx»JC,y (t-y{6 - / %- «»• • . , « 9'. »• • 4C.'7 2 ^ /s,rBl - */- i^Afc«c*>fcct4^«si-r r ^s/. !•' t.*-* K . f . -4 ‘- . i|!^Lot C^yeTo^S - /^?v.’/CV n I '•'It . Vii . *•' • ' J:5i ...•‘'^iTi e*OA'. -if'-- ____ ^ hrcK .(iitc. f^T:>c 0_. . H90 . P^i_ Oor^teX 2c*^®» '■ S<3o2. *9.3% :-ii ’•I ■ -■ 1 » r /£• ' P ‘ • >9' ■ ‘ f''§• - tti. J /o*r . .. ........ 7Xi^zro.'. ZTO r^OO.'. ^/0,^-L^ ^J. r /^,r2»2 . --- >/2^ C C, BC3,2.^6». adflHai J N ••r 'V r <«. NV- 0 >ri a T r» \ V \ A_____ L Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members City Administrator Moorse Prom:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning s Zoning Administrator Date: Subject September 9/ 1991 #1669 John W. Walker^ 1310 Spruce Place - Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing Note: Applicant has provided a revised deck/hardcover proposal, and requested a 50% hardcover credit for the house and garage based on the surface water catchment system currently in place. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Letter of Request Hardcover Calculations Revised Site/Hardcover Plan Applicant's Appeal to Council 8/22/91 Planning Commission Action Notice 8/19/91 Memo & Exhibits of 8/13/91 Discussion The applicant has slightly reduced the size of the proposed deck that will be replacing the existing deck, although a new deck along the south side of the house is still proposed. Applicants have indicated the hardcover items in both the 0-75' and 75-250' zones which they will remove to result in decreases. The pre-1975 hardcover situation has also been defined by the applicant (there are no City records which could confirm this). Please review the letter from app]icant's attorney, and the hardcover calculations as well as the attached sketch. Applicants request a 50% credit for the house and garage contributions to hardcover based on the use of an underground catchment system which retains the bulk of the surface water drainage in underground perforated tubing. This system apparently allows for the absorption of the run-off underground, rather than allowing it to run overland towards the lake. In theory, this is an excellent system and would seem to meet the City's water quality enhancement objectives. In practice, the applicant has been pleased with the function of this system. A technical evaluation of this system is beyond the scope of this review. The capacity of the system and its current condition are not documented. While Planning Commission might wish to discuss the merits of using this drainage system to justify granting a hardcover variance, staff would recommend against giving some hardcover percentage credit to this system. L Zoning Pile #1669 September 9, 1991 Page 2 Without the drain system credit, applicant's hardcover reductions are summarized as follows: HARDCOVER SUMMARY 0-75' 75-250' Pre-1975 14.1% 31.2% Current 18.7% 50.6% Proposed 7.2% 30.4% After the August Planning Commission meeting, the applicant appealed to the Council requesting that they be allowed to continue construction in exchange for the Walker's agreement to bring the property into conformance with the hardcover ordinance subject to variance approval. The Council denied the request, but suggested that this item could be brought directly to the September 23 Council meeting after a Planning Commission recommendation is obtained. Staff Recommendation Staff would recommend against numerically reducing the hardcover percentage based on the inground drainage system. However, if Planning Commission feels that the proposed reductions in the 0-75' and 75-250' zones to hardcover levels below the pre-1975 levels justify the granting of hardcover variances, then a recommendation for approval would be in order. What is Planning Commission's recommendation regarding requiring the after-the-fact fee for the zoning application? (After-the-fact fee will automatically be charged for the building permit). Isv r >. i- .AA Y.^ Johnson & Wood. p. .-\ -M ::a' ^ AKL > ^ t \vAv::\T> v!\^r.'^nT^ rr.l.FPH‘NK TF.i.E< September 6, 1991 Planning Commission City of Orono P.0, Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: John and Pat Walker Residence 1310 Spruce Place Dear Planning Commission Members: We enclose for your review, calculations of hardcover at 1310 Spruce Place, describing the hardcover which existed in 1975, the present conditions, and the proposed conditions. Also enclosed is a site plan showing the locations of the hardcover and other information. In addition to these documents, we have the following comments: 1.The applicants are sensitive to the ordinance requirements for minimum hardcover in the area nearest the lake. Accordingly, the pre-1975 hardcover in the 0 to 75 foot zone is being reduced from 992 square feet to 509 square feet, a reduction of approximately 50%. 2.The applicants are removing all landscaping cloth in order to comply with the City's interpretation of the ordinance which apparently provides that all landscaping cloth constitutes hardcover. 3.The applicants propose to remove all patio areas which were added since 1975. 4.The applicants request a 50% credit against the hardcover created by the house and garage because the surface water catchment system retains the bulk of this drainage for absorption in undergroun*.: v;erforated tubing. This credit would bring the hardcove.- "m to 25.1%. Planning Commission September 6, 1991 Page Two 5.The reconfiguration of the deck not only removes it from the 0 to 75 foot zone but also extends 84 square feet thereof over soft cover area. The proposed deck with gaps between the deckboard is readily permeable to surface water and the applicants request that the Planning Commission so interpret t.ie proposed deck. This results in a total hardcover reduction of 84 feet which brings the proposal, including a credit for the drainage system, down to 24.6%, making a formal variance unnecessary. If credit is not given for the drainage system, the hardcover percentage comes down to 29.7%. In summary, hardcover in the 0 to 75 foot zone is being reduced by 50% from the pre-1975 levels, and hardcover in the remainder of the property is being reduced by 2.7%. If both of the requested credits are given (deck overhanging softcover and catchment system) hardcover in the 75 to 250 foot zone ordinance limits. rainwater is within Sincerely, JOHNSON &.W00 Richara J. Schieffe RJS/mc Enclosure cc: John and Pat Walker ■-it It • y if 1 •3^*.|:fi^ John 6 Pat Walker 1310 Spruce Place Proposed Variance CALCULATION FOR 0-75' ITEM PRE 75 PRESENT PROPOSED Shed 97 97 97 Brick Steps 60 60 60 Brick Patio 250 w-4 0 90 Retaining Wall 63 88 88 124 A QConcrete Steps 114 114 Brick Steps 48 48 4o Steps 12 12 12n Part of wood deck 38 38 U Landscape areas w/landscape cloth 310 520 0 TOTAL S.F. 7025 992 1317 509 PERCENT 14.12%18.7%7.2% Present to Proposed Reduction of 61.4% CALCULATIONS FOR 75-250' PROPOSEDITEMPRE 75 PRESENT House 787 787 Garage 590 590 Brick walk 44 44 Sidewalk 308 195 Retaining walls 0 19 Deck 262 262 Driveway 2300 2300 Entrance Stoop 113 113 Landscape with cloth or plastic 0 2740 Steps 9 9 Brick Patio 0 96 TOTAL S.F.4413 7155 PERCENT 31.2%50.6% 882 590 44 163.5 19 296* 2300 0 0 9 0 Present to Proposed Reduction of 40.0% 4294.5 30.4% [51.4%] DRAIN SYSTEM 441 295 44 163.5 19 296* 2300 O 0 9 0 3558.5 25.1% DRAIN SYSTEM Fifty percent allowance for rainwater catchment system. * Includes 84 s.f. of deck that overhangs soft cover. LAW 0FnC£3 Johnson & Wood PETER W. JOHNSON JOHN w WOOD. :r . CARY L PHLECER warren V BIGELOW. JR C SCOTT MASSIE JAMES M. VENTliRA WILLIAM R. KOENIG ANN C SCHUU RICHARD J. SCHIEFFER THOMAS A. SCHULENBERa U 730 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 55331 TELEPHONE (612) 475 1515 TELECOPIER (612) 475-0311 or CClNStL Lj^RLE j. MEDERL c ECKE JAMES D NUc KINNCN LL.>L AiilT'ASTS 2305 COMMERCE SOLLEVARO MOUND. MINNESOTA SS344 TELEPHONE (M2) 472 I060 TELECOPIER («12) 472 6103 DAVID J HER2LCK EDITH L. MINSHALL REPiy TO; WAY2.\TA August 22, 1991 m CTYCf CSCVOI'uaeisoxifs Mayor and City Council City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 AUG 2 e 1991 Re: John and Pat Walker Residence 1310 Spruce Place Dear Mayor and Council: This is a request to give direction to City staff tc issue a Building Perroit being withheld under City policies which require that Building Permits not be issued until hardcover issues are resolved. On July 1, 1991, Roncor Corporation applied for a Building Permit to add a second story to the residence of John and Pat Walker at 1310 Spruce Place. (See Zoning Administrator's chronology attached.) Staff review noted that hardcover exceeded permitted limits. Rcncor and the Walkers explored with staff ways to reduce hardcover. The Walkers prepared necessary surveys, site plan^and hardcover calculations which reduced hardcover from 50% to 32-6 in the 75-250 foot zone. The Walkers request that a post-1975 retaining wall (which includes landscaping rock with cloth underlay) in the 0-75 foot zone be permitted to halt erosion and bluff migration. Walker cite in favor of approval, a rooftop water catchment and drainage system, bluff migration and eiosion, adjacent unimproved right-of-way for sump area, unu.suai lot configuration and topography. The Planning Commission tabled to September 16, 1991 suggesting "a return to pre—1975 hardcover levels • . . ** • (See notice attached.) Mayor and City Council August 22, 1991 Page Two Mr. and Mrs. Walker have a mortgage commitment which will expire before construction can be completed given the delays in the tine table, and carrying costs which are mounting. The Walkers are living in the lower level of a home occupied by their daughter in the interim. In the event the City Council agrees to permit the staff to issue the Building Permit, the Walkers agree to bring the property into conformance with the hardcover ordinance by removal of the hardcover, by variance from the terms of the ordinance, or by a combination of the two. Sincerely, JOHNSON & WOOD RJS/mc Enclosure % M L 1 W . i t :' • .>1. . \ •'ST’’ ■■IWT C}ht^!^^L^&rf - /3/0 :M 'ClO^fpey^ilLap^- Ll-Tr^-.flpeX /O A. ^ ^"" / If ^ ^ -----------------— ./....... . ......V .... .r-------- -/.—- I tIa 1 Ijey- 4^:> 4'<g.l/ Itiu/t )/kjJC^O£^ €^)CCCSf^l^<S^au\I6^ de i .Z--------------- - I . ✓ f f c I /^^*5 ^ ^ <il^ ,c^<JvlS fu.c6- ?hiej^^^u>. ^ L [iaL*iecr ^dcuju^ i ')b \Je^ “X , '^"1)\ nir y\ar€k^iJer flUcT-J r li vtc>^ issu e_ ^-fiy ko uSe- t^iijDcO I _kgi_Heggle^ ■'Cr o^:<;^----------- SV?P U><i?■w4>j,-l . .C^■lV^-^i -Hcc?y-,g_j^ A ■ . — .r^k. r wr^. ^^.1 .k*V«V'-_'M'; . .*.rk*'SJ'LiC'i:^^f7l v^'.. •^^U. prUi^k-^ *.Aft • •■ - ~~~ .-- -------------------------n ■ b^aAa^*. ^ aim .i-^, CITY OP ORONO P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 413-7251 ZONING PILE 11669 55323 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice; 8/20/91 TO: John W. Walker 1310 Spruce Place Mound, MN 55364-9628 COPIES TO: Dick Schieffer 730 East Lake St. Wayzata, MN 55391 TYPE OP APPLICATION: Variance DATE OP MEETING: 8/19/91 VOTE: 6 For 0 Against Planni.119’ Connii'* ssion recOTinends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS Tabled so that applicant can provide an alternate proposal for hardcover removals. Planning Commission suggested that a return to pre 1975 hardcover levels would be appropriate. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as Planning Commission on Monday, September 16, 1991; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. Isv J •I f ti* ^■^•)">[•;iiiiircJ*r»lr: ■ ■■I i«W« wn*\ •ICII ItTHra mm^m li- :V^.--:'^-; V-A- To;Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson 7. From: Michael P. Gaffron, 7-kSst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:August 13, 1991 Subject: #1669 John W. Walker, 1310 Spruce Place - Variance Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IB, Single family lakeshore residential, 1 acre, sewered Application - Request for hardcover variances to construct 2- story addition and deck addition Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 & 2 - No hardcover or structure allowed in 0-75' zone, maximum 25% hardcover allowed in 75-250' zone. Variances Requested 1.75-250' hardcover. Existing « 50.6% Allowed = 25% Proposed = 32% 2.0-75' hardcover. Existing = 18.75% Allowed = 0% Proposed * 11.4% Applicant's Stated Hardships See attached sheets submitted by applicant, Exhibit D List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Application Plat Map Property Owners List Applicant's Hardship Statement Existing Site Plan Proposed Site Plan Existing & Proposed Hardcover Calculations Submitted Staff Review of Hardcover Elevation Views Proposed Floor Plans Building Inspector's Chronology •jwra lOBfl*! r«i4fsT«r=H«i ATira MirfsI«C=V«Ts wm • V ¥ . ; ; •• ' ';!• ■m p;:flVM Zoning File #1669 August 13, 1991 Page 2 Discussion This application has become an after-the-fact request, because the applicant's builder started the proposed construction without building permits. As soon as this was discovered, the Inspections Department issued a Stop Work Order. Please review the chronology supplied by the Building Inspector. In effect, the applicant's builder contacted staff early in the process, and was advised of the permit requirements as well as the issues with hardcover. The builder then apparently decided that he could ultimately remove enough hardcover to meet City requirements, and proceeded to remove the roof of the house and construct the second story without a building permit. Staff believes that work occurred for about 2 weeks between the initial contact early in July and the posting of the Stop Work Order on July 30. Between one-third and one-half of the hardcover on the entire property is in rock landscape beds. Except for the 700 s f. rock bed west of the driveway, which is lined with plastic, all the other rock beds have a non-woven fabric liner. The proposed house addition includes a 95 s.f. "squaring off" of the northwest corner of the house where previously there was an uncovered deck. This corner and the rest of the house is intended to have a second story added, the superstructure for this already having been completed as noted above. Because of the hardcover excess, and the change of this corner from a platform to a more intense form of hardcover, a hardcover variance is required. Further, the decks proposed to be rebuilt and added at the north and south ends also comprise a more intense hardcover than now exists. Since a portion of the existing deck extends into the 0-75' zone, applicant has been advised and has agreed to rebuild it totally out of the 0-75' zone. The brick patio and all the landscaping and retaining walls were constructed at some time in the past without any City review. We have no information as to when these improvements occurred. Average setback is not an issue on this property since these additions sit behind the line of the house to the north, and on the south side this property abuts an unimproved street right-of- way. f -'I Zoning File #1669 August 13r 1991 Page 3 The "proposed" hardcover worksheets were submitted by the builder before the variance request was submitted. The homeowner and builder feel that reducing 75-250' hardcover to 25% would mean losing the patio, the deck, and portions of the drive. The applicant would like to expand the decks, and is prepared to reduce the driveway if necessary but would prefer to not lose the patio. Hardcover Removal Options Any recommendation considered by Planning Commission should include removal of the 700 s.f. of plastic lined rock beds west of the driveway. Since the Council put on hold its determination whether non-woven fabric is non-hardcover. Planning Commission could also recommend that all other rock beds upon the property have the fabric underliner removed. This leaves 11.4% in the 0- 75' zone if none of the sidewalks, retaining walls, deck, patio or shed are removed. Certainly the patio is the next most expendable area in the 0-75' zone to accomodate further reductions in that zone. In the 75-250' zone, removal of all the landscaping hardcover and addition of the expanded deck and upper story as proposed, results in 32% in the 75-250' zone. Since 1% equals 141 s.f., about 1000 additional s.f. would have to be removed to get to the 25% level. Removal of the 420 s.f. parking area next to the garage would lower it to 29%, Not much more of the driveway could be removed and still leave it functional for backing out. If variances are denied, a building permit could not be issued until hardcover in the 75-250' zone is reduced to 25% under a reasonable, functional scheme. This may not be possible. Planning Commission may also wish to consider whether, if applicant could reduce the 75-250' zone to 25%, should any portion of the 0-75' hardcover also be removed? The City Council has declared that all "illegal" hardcover in 0-75' z ;nes must be removed . Issues to Consider 1.After-the-fact fee will be automatically charged for the building permit. Is there any justification to not charge an after-the-fact variance application fee? 2.If all plastic/fabric hardcover is removed, is there sufficient hardship to justify a variance for 32% hardcover in 75-250' zone? fi Zoning File #1669 August 13, 1991 Page 4 3.Are there additional areas of excessive hardcover that can reasonably be removed to more closely meet the 25% allowance? 4.Can 0-75* hardcover areas be reduced to compensate for the 75-250* additions? 5.Since existing deck is in poor condition (not treated lumber) and needs replacement, should it be rebuilt partially in 0-75 ’ zone per existing dimensions and location? Recommendation Options Planning Commission should consider the following recommendation options: 1. Approval as proposed, remove all plastic/fabric hardcover on entire property. 2, Same, plus removal of portions of existing patio or driveway. 3. Partial approval, with conditions (specify). 4. Denial. 5. 6. Other. Requirement of after-the-fact fee for zoning application (after-the-fact fee will be automatically charged for the building permit). Isv i -r. i \ f' 1 CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) di 1 A £ X . V; a f*' V PROPERTY LOCATION cin if orvnq FLVAVi.1 OFFICE i yin VAAA/it'. 1 hJJV^VWVV 2bSite Address 13 IQ Spr UCQ.'l\(\C<L_ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) i^t 8 — Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. 01 CEti 175.00 CHECK 71 175.00 07/23/y APPLICANT Name Phone (home) ^11 - 11'l f Address;t3 )o Phone (work) ^~7 (~-~7! "7 f_____ City: Cpr^hjo _______ Zip; Phone (home)OWNER (if differe^ than applicant) ^ _ _ _ _ Phone (work) ;6(c6 I » •'. » . I ^ Address: t3?3o*i» Cityz un.J Zip; ^ Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT OSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoninc District 4/2-1& Present Ose of Property S'-n.|'e Cant))Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP RThOEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail; VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width y Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) Other aAJEU3SHlP Describe undue hardship cr pracpical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:_ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements t _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ArrrM^h 2. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8J<"xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8J*"xll ). Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8Js"xll"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your vari£mce application is not complete if the above ^nfnrnm^tion has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature U).Date ONNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, ari Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 1 ii» Vsc 66)1 "n (65) » S *> («J^ s riV” ^ ?S 5"773177 QS 05 na B 0 * IIV V J3L1 in)r-w /< (P3 *{'3 ^ • tW). m > fi A ns 4 240 V P 5 (IS) jfZ • 2HL- i4S ^ y » t 'SJ. fSli b>f4. ft a o€wrr AVC ■T»» - J . 7 L*P n' K /C ... •• 15 ' n , ,j r r r r RUN DATE 07/25/$l BATCH 005 HENT4EPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 58 07-117-25 41 0051 01505 • SPRUCE PL SANDRA L NUNEMAKER BRETT t SUSAN LARSON 1505 SPRUCE PL HOUND MN 55564 4 • 1 r < .1 r r C f > f-• r 38 07-117-25 41 0052 01376 NORTH ARM DR MILLIAM E BOHEN HILLIAH E BOHEN 40 PARK LANE MPLS MN 55416 ‘ r .58 08-117-25 52 0014 58 58-117-25 32 0015 PROP ADDR 01280 SPRUCE PL 01290 SPRUCE PL A OHNER NAME P J A 8 J SCHUELLER STATE LAND DEPT 'TAXPAYER PAUL J A SUSAN J SCHUELLER JEFFREY E PAGE NAHE/ADDR 1280 SPRUCE PL 6951 ISr AVE S \ • . HOUND m 5S564 $ • RICHFIELD MN 55425 / $ 38 08-117-23 32 0017 58 08-117-25 52 0018 PROP ADDR 01510 SPRUCE PL 01318 SPRUCE PL ONHER NAME 4OHN N MALKER •PATRICIA A GROETKEN r "•TAXPAYER JOHN H HALKER PATRICIA A GROETKEN i NAHE/ADDR 1310 SPRUCE PLACE 1518 SPRUCE PLACE HOUND m 55564 HOUND MN 553t.4 58 08-117-25 52 0020 . 38 08-117-25 52 »i024 PROP ADDR 01550 CHERRY PL 01575 CHERRY PL 1 r OHNER NAME SUSAN H SUHEY DAVID CHAOHICK ET At. TAXPAYER SUSAN H SUMEY SCOTT R S ELIZABETH B .9 NAHE/ADDR 1550 CHERRY PL 1575 CHERRY PL NOUND MN 55364 MOUtJO MN 55564 IE4GRAM REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 11 38 07-117-25 41 0078 01295 SPRUCE PL STATE LAT4D DEPT CITY OF ORONO CONVEYED 2/8/82 ST DEED 161147 .1 38 08-117-25 32 0016 01300 SPRUCE PL F L ROACH ASA ROACH FRANK A SHIRLEY ROACH 1300 SPRUCE PLACE MOUTiO MN 55364 58 08-117-J5 52 0019 01550 CMtKRY PL SUSAN H SUHEV SUSAN M SUMEY 1550 CHERRY PL MOUtW m 5!>364 05 05 TOTAL BATCH 005 00011 -4 A I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRFSENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESEN1ATI0N OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNi'Y OEPARTIKNT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF HY KNOWLEDGc AND BELIEF DATE’■Mm A£t n I t • b. ; Addendum to land use application: John W. Walker, 1310 Spruce Place, Mound, 55364-962*' Hardship & Unusual Property Conditions- This property consists of two platted lots which have been combined to create a single homesite. The lot is high bluff property abutting North Arm. The topography is steep slope down to the lake combined with gradual slope away from the lake. The property owner found that the bluff migrates toward the lake, evidenced by surface cracks in the sod. A number of retaining walls had previously been installed to halt surface migration. Removal of such landscaping devices, while reducing hardcover, would increase the rate of migration, erosion, and eventually, increase the surface water flow. The second issue is the saving of numerous 70-80 foot oak trees on the site which provide heavy shade and retard grass and vegetation growth which increases surface water erosion. The use of small size landscaping rock ro cov'=»r bare areas under the oaks is designed to retard soil erosion. The third issue i*=' the configure cion of the combined lots in a modified wedge shape which constrains the location, shape and form of all improvements. Sidewalks, landscaping rock, patio brick and other landscape elements are designed to carry surface water to sump or low areas or create sump areas while retarding erosion. The property abuts a 50 foot city street right-of-way (Grant Street for approximately 150 feet) which is not improved and IKJMl r if provides a sump area for surface water for the property and the neighborhood. The property owner has installed a catchment system for all roof top surface water drainage. This catchment system connects all downspouts to a six inch diameter perforated tubing. The tubing is looped down several feet below the surface and then rises, creating a storage basin from which surface water migrates into and is absorbed by the soil in much the same way as a drainfield absorbs sewer effluent. There is presently installed on the property approximately 250-300 feet of six inch perforated tubing, creating a storage basin for a substantial portion of roof top drainage. The property owner will remove landscaping cloth and plastic from landscaped areas, as necessary to meet city specifications and reduce hardcover as defined by the ordinance. j r.*jf HARDCOVER CALCULATIOtl ViDfiKSHEE SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE Existing Hardcover in Zone r- U>^, *9A«U^ H»U.5 «€V. 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' YIl ■! r V • »• /% I House n 1 ' 'V\v=x:> fj t I A.:;.* 3. Garage c -X LENGTH WIDTH • /X# 1 ^ 9.0 rs • mA0 • * • *______ X • • • • • • S.F. • • •• X S.P. •• •* « • • S.F. #.-»•. *- X S. r . ■sy <42/ ey ‘&ejk4c n\n-^ C“'V-nr.y', c. B ih^/eway ______■ X 1-v:aikji.n. » **\V V * CuA. r. r^.. SlDGWALK , m F.Landscape mm; ■ ; ;/ Iff AREAS UNDERLAIN BY ■ , PLASTIC- ■' SHEETING 'I'e G. Other rr-f’- r/ I Total Hardcover in Zone ro s-eca HARDCOVER CALCULATION HORKSHt.: SETBACK zone : (ciecz Z 7=-2SO' ’SQ-oOC' 5C0-10CO' &<is7iNG H ardcover ki Zone H ouse LENGTH sA»^ I2J fi. Garage c. Driveway E. Patio/ p.Landscape AREAS UNOtRLAIN SY . . PLASTIC SHEETINS - X s. Other 9UL-ft£E_— ^ WIDTH -s-i" Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone .97 /7c/ /<a 3 vfc; S • F s.r t S.P. S.F. S.P. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 6~70. 6 S.F. fT ~7oa$‘ - S.F. m 0 £,yo.g a[j] loss' X 100 9.S-V__■% S/NS.-THIS iS <:, .VjC/ST ...,M I •'< .vnrf-r t •.,i 7i*-iTO HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORXSHS SST3ACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75^^5-250^ 250-500" 500-10C0' Existing Hardcover in Zone • • •1 7-3-ni U0T 7-^8, ‘H'.IO, 3A«»A AlU» 08</. House IQ b - X 14.^ LENGTH 2 o'. 35 WIDTH X 2,4.2, ■ /0.4-lO.'l 0(Ck.-?. tT 3. Garage 2.4.*!>t.4.3 C. DRIVEVfAY Cr-,.> X f4? eT5o //J ^<T2 2300 /?S ' f?2 0 /9 V/fS 14 i4o <r/-M G S.F. y s..= . S.F. 8 • • S.F.V 'w • ^ ^D' ‘ S.F. y . / S.F. S.F./ / S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F. • »S'. F.J 7ao -•S.F. S.F. ^ S.F. S.F. S.F. S • f* •B X 100' ■ So. CO ^ •-V-A-7 • • m* *• 9^ *•' L't,. -I iTirtiiiiiiiii •a: '.v' ?,<?-? <s» •» •. ■iirt .■■iiitiMi. I HARDCOVER aLCOLATION WORKSHEi;i<£^{ ‘Wm ScT3Ac:< ZONE; (circle cne ) 0-73'^7r-250^ E xisting Hardcover in Zone A. House __3^ LENGTH m B. Garage c. D riveway 0*. Sidewalk E. Patio / Deck f F.Landscape UNOERUIN BY FLASTIC SHEETING G. Other WIDTH DO^ ^39 t^O - 34 2€ Total Hardcover in Zone Total Proferty A rea in Zone S • F • S.F. S.P. S.F. S.F. S. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. . S.F. S.F. S.F S.F. S.F* S.F. O. *• B 05 3<?afe S.F. pn I.y. fTl m sqac ^[5] i*^. i</t> x mn^^T.7 % /(ViC»ic4-re5^ THev CA^i'- <io- (T Cx.'.uo re f t ...jrmn BS'x ■ S'.■ ■ u • m • » /^uwvm r /5/.t>_. 7^ '.asD * (^ AiS^A * }‘^jj^a i dC !) , - rA .v^- 0-7S* C^A 'lotr.z!^^ ............. ........ •9C^/r/^V.//C—:®/^f74T.^wcw'^rvift cAtta ^A/ST7 ajg /^C. »■ S^-C* ^ sw^fTtift c>fi.cs. _ .fV2©<oe>s*^ 7f^..J Pl?>*«.SM4l!5iITl^_<y«?i«« s <^7Ls.*f, » ------------c or SZO a.-Q. f^oQt/^^Az-nc^ '■■•im ' .. ». . 'J ,^ite^^#.-j^rm»*j/A»G.„*i^4vws„ 0ft ____ _ t>«c (Cl. „3B _____ V *«*•.; fgc0oacfc» £ iTP ------------?!7.^. s^jdo.5 > _____ ______Ct^JtrMf^ snty ">______________ (2l-Pei«.- swd»HL7TV!>-^<?A^«^f«^T; • C. = 27.*?^ . ^«#wrr /^^K:AffAcrs f5««**^ 7671/. TO .. jij ^i«f«/6oAY fiV' 2^/Z S ^ C6/sf»^_ ey ;*/^:^. ..Ct>ec»i "TO CfNnO ......... Ot/Atxs sr-A^"^ ... !, • ---------CP atx ? ____ __________ . —_____4‘4?-.»m«s/o/w /Aj 0'7r'^ ii^vv.>»' ^-A«»a«w« •*•«•«/ia-^zo..:k'U ». t>P^ ir '?ozs:^ /AV Iv. ____A?p ,t^„s .Af^.. ... OAoUPAi f^fttc.. . fefc</6J»/A>C> |P Ma>S *. . .r-.J^ig^\fe. ^00^1ZQ*n7.0 i.4, j£ecM//^c^inc, !T t^CCK A^iT7^...Q^t*<. fiArnc r }tOr^. . . ^ llsr-7.oe>-yzo.T!i-i.O‘tffo S ^SZS' /tf. . .. - . .. = S2.0% _NOVri PB.. Z'?^0 i^. 750 -r^. /5 ____wvEU_i?tA£T7t^.. ZOWD j.^. tAJiry AJO*J-t>Mou^ ____?*^U<L.. _______________ ;- lyv » T3t--.'- !v-■ I ‘ '.-si s'-^ -A fc. •■ U-" . . » 4» i« • • %-n ■-. I V;. V* - iMMi kiy i. ..%-M»A'i ■ l^i. ai 1 -J a ■ li' -., ^’••' i£i£>. ■ il»^, * |?i^v/»Nrv>4 'S \tievo FtiOtK. stMTH#1669 -si' %Ptsr stb^ 'a' M 'J* A’ ^ 'f|l|P<!'• I ■ |P ^ **^1 -Viw* [vvi' ' ■ *wvy . /< Q^+iioA-)i>L25c»y /3/0 r'"# •‘ '■ ' Ai 'i r • i -:.S:- M. li iv^ [f. vrwfsi'' l-iP »•« *^»4 DaTC* pe/vMir Se^ le)fitr f Utek sua /c ^ -GuiAda'n uj;^ (Kiyec^WM^ 7-^ o^ i*uViV Su^r^J^ ^ cc^.c^ . ^ ‘ ---------------- er^:^s5iV<2. -<*v ---- - ^ - ..^Iwwd; 6^»4U«irs«(^tX4.^ . S.AfC^/i&4X_^j€A^ ci7X6ut4*W ll^^rCdof^1<T 4|[ T6o4*te^ Jb.. <I^SC4J£ i j)dfia» Juir lwcic^ri/( 7/S^-59 ?4^»\SCMiy ^3)d^f^^OM.cC .dj^y___ er feJuiOahi__jSi^j(?Ui4tttl 1 H >4" ^ ijia*rra44^e^ ^Aye^ u^ou ld: »4- r^i4^ ^ 'foT- -kKocot«4> _’n^rr. • ■» yjOfloMf^^iJ^'*^ H®eJeL_:luc .4eckl---- >* «• * •♦ 7r'-31p.P to^vg cy 6l>l ?<L.y _______________________________ f —\ :-p^^■:., i [%• • —■;1 f- ''—*•• •' 'X' 1 ■ k • " V ■-„ I—,.—: » ■ ‘J -----------------------—• f'-,-Hh w • V.v'v Ugd|||j& t* , • ;/ 'ilhf[ftii-^i7^ ...1^ ^s m. Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council City Administrator Moorse : 4 • y ; '* Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator September 10» 1991 #1677 Cedric Dettloff, 1255 Dickenson Street - Variances - Public Hearing Soning Districtt RR-IB Rcqtiired area ■ 2 acres or 87,120 s.f. Existing - .31 or 13,548 s.f. Vcrtincnt Oxdiiisaoc 1.Section 10.28, Subd. 5 (B) - Front street setback variance required for proposed addition. Required >■ 50* Existing - 41* Proposed ■ 41* Variance « 9* or 15% Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) - Allowed lot coverage. Lot area ■ 13,548 s.f. Allowed lot coverage * 2032.2 s.f. or 15% Existing - 2956.51 s.f. *-l Proposed « 2956.51 s.f. **>2 Application does not involve an increase in structural footprint coverage though an excessive amount of lot coverage exists, the proposed two story addition involves an intensifioatlon of that footprint coverage. *-l Existing • 10* X 32* enclosed single story workshop area. ,v *-2 Proposed - 10* x 32* two story addition consisting of a grade level workshop and second story 3-season porch. Review Exhibit F and G. List of IhlMte A - Application A-1 - Applicant*8 Addendum B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Applicant*8 Sketch E - Staff Sketch P - Floor Plan G - Elevation i-X-' ^ t , ■ t fii iinAV I ' ’1 i.'* Zoning File #1677 September 10r 1991 Page 2 of 2 Description of Request Applicant proposes replacement an of existing grade level workshop along the south side of the existing residence. The existing single story structure will be replaced with a two story structure consisting of a grade level workshop and 3-season porch at first level. Review Exhibits F and G. The proposed addition to the south side of the existing residence will be located 41* from the unimproved street right-of-way of Keene Avenue (60* width). The existing garage is located .3* from the street lot line adjacent to Keene Avenue. The secondary structure identified as an existing house on the survey of 1961 is no longer used as a residence structure but serves as an accessory storage structure. Mr. Dettloff advises that all rental use ceased many years ago. Bswisw oC Bsxdships Please review Exhibit A-l» applicant*s addendum. Ipettloff notes that following hardships: Mr. Recent rains caused serious structural collapse of block walls within shed addition. General structural condition of the shop addition requires major structural repair/replacement. Location of house on property prevents addition from meeting 50* street setback. The existing footprint of 10* x 32* will remain the same with the proposed addition. Keene Avenue was platted at a 60* width serving one additional residence and is neither maintained by the City nor planned for a major upgrade. k - ■ • ' - . VMi - -rM & i i 1 -mmmm - t- ♦ r-v. r - ' r u t /1 CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCS APPLICATI 1 . V ice) #• Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional va: Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) j^fter-the—Fact Pees (Double application fee) 7 CITf OF uRO^O • • •• 90 •L : \ - I t ^ » / >I Aitnm.w ut I AUA« /•. f riijV a c*ui t 17^ a I «/• Vri;rr^UI ;uur 11 X t 9/0 YOU 4 7.*.Mrr*n AVW ZfM TnOr?:.wak/kirv u^'va MW'a f w'/ wc/ a'T. FROPBRTY LOGATIOH # Site Address 0 I h S tZ. Property Identification Number (P.I.O. ) Q2. " U 3/ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLZCAHT Phone (home) I47 “l ^ 7 ^ ^ Name Address x 1 r^t e Phone ^wor)c) i/7H LLrr PiifrAt, 7^n City:jisafe_ JShx ^ (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address x City:Zip: v'.'; Date Property Acquired _ JAoT ’ ne^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. (month/year) JT 08B OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District /T/?- la Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) CRZPTXOR OF RigORST Estimated Construction Cost s/f^i C> Describe request in detail: '•i Lot Area Lot Width •V V tl,/ -iV.: V Setback Variances (Front Hardcover Side _ _ _ Rear) - ut other i.- ■ «s iiiaii iitiiaiiinfciilriiai i \ V i J BMDSBIPDescribe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations- - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - DBSCStlPTIOH OF OHUSUAL PROPERTF CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _ _ ___ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _—- - - - -- IBQUIXBD SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form—-- - - -CBf^ified Property Owhe^ List of owners within 150' (you must obtain _ _ _ _ _ _ _this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Map (obtained with property owners listj^ C^ftiTicate df survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8J5"xll" for reproduction)• Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes £jj existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll )• Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll"). As an addendum to this applicationr please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please resMmber that vonr variance application is not complete_ij—the above has not been APfLZCAMT'S 8X6NATURB . The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date ______ SXOATIIRB ^ ^ Ths hereby ackowledgas and agrees to this application and further authorises reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Coamission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Oimer's Signature ^ _ _ _Date — Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning COMission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all schedul^ of the Plannimg ComndLssion and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an amthorisod agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 4 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. Iti’-V.. ■<r ■ ' i ■ i—■ —tads mffirtiaflniiliTiTliiiiB J h/- Mif hjs /> ip Tt .1 v) / • •3 •> /+^ r 'J~l-ii 'S \ e~t ^ ^-4 a </ (' z/7-^-4 <^-S af t'-a'i*^ 7o ^ 'fu/e n iy hcuy pv r / <>-<^ • 'fh) s. tS/fi L loci' 6i^'9//^ p'o cp/-ap5<s and f^H if?t^ tnyshcf ■ar^s.'Tlh 1^00 f- IP sfi/^ /'^TsLcd-UjiT-h /7o J^fr, a9<3. ¥■ » -1 —* ^f?e/7Cf»t/c h "and P^FdiPs l?3S Tc jp^ doti&r rfhe. house Cuknr<^ }p /'s /acaie^ 4oc ‘S iPcf *-tn id' 7^/^ Cu/'tho ud 3 W'a h / a h ^ • ....... y£ ^ a^ uc~ ^JltT’ihh----- ... t^;// he- 9 feuJ f>t^ b</ ,pr^ sente cde/ to /tfr^C'. 'The- UTsf-a't-te -& /-T pyab-a h!'/ fioe ToT^n feet -to alcse -to the s-tre r t m .*».»-•• •w *». . '%> ^ ‘ ^ et » ■• TThe a*.'€ta ft fuer-f-ten /S a.p f ro-x < tit i 'k ! 9 fontf or foPpf from the pTreep ^hJ ft shouij he f.fty Pt "77?^ Pep9i)r SL I 3hi aJJi't/oh tc do n e CO h $TJZ_ The hc^se. is TaeitrJ- ^ amttsTri^ he mete prrouv^ area. ^y\/.i"th - "f^his 3 / 7/^ 3 /? U^Bs - -h^foye tho. d-he dann a^- V 4 V *■ »'•; •- hn «- i *• ‘ ••• ■ "Xi....Yef-U..<.i'f~ ^oicr Thcurhf<btf CottsUoy-at/oO Tef-anhs fo tn 9 ptoh letr7. JL I ,■• ».•» m V ‘ • -^v. . ^ • ;: * i .1 r ^ ‘ ■UN Mvt mnM/vi , ,4 .> • - i*. ’H . » i • - f ■A1CN 9m ■^..r •. / i: 1. HEttCnN COUNTY PKOrCRTY INTORHATION SYSTEM MOMRTV OMNERS LIST TMfRAVIR NW«/ABtR ■ l : J • ■ M ft-ur-ts SI eoot ntSt tlCRINMM ST IMMMI R NMM ISNARO N NAIM ST RAUL m SflOt ; ' • * ■ ■■ ,i ? . I IS Ot-117-tS SI SOSA TAMRAVtR T A A S A PlSCtNR TMUSORI A SSRTRUDS PXSCHER toss CSWNRCI SLVO •1 SSSAS M-1 , V ; ; SO .or*ii7-ts Si oosf Sit« SMRINSaN ST N 7 scisasr a r n sasasT WlUAN A fCARRMi SCNNEBT NAYAATA Ml • } : 0 SO M-117-tS Si ooso ; OlttS OfCKOBON ST 0 N VOUNO TRUSTU lOX SST OAML N VOUNO. ■ -i."- NAVIATA IM SSS91 V ’ ■' • i ' t r. • /i • t t ^ ■' ■" '* ' ’ 3f«H-1 - V 1'. 1 . ‘ '; ’ * . - ■ ■ . k •^ if ■ o ♦i * . ■ ,■ •• •' '• V 4 ^ . t •^ f T / f'm- 1 1 M-i . •:\ V • * o*•r 'A I * J ^4 . > • * ♦ . i-: f.-'- »/ '1J • /’ ;r-:i I';■%<* - H i 1*' it*. t, .4 . f .! M , j* -vT t ."■ ’■ ¥ I ■'t * < M » j S0 0S-117-2S Si 0027 012SS OZCKENSON ST H J ornrtofF ctal NAIIIQN J DETTLOf f 12S5 DICREHSON ST KAYZATA m 55S91 30 02-117-23 31 0037 00S30 HANLON AVE N A L TNZES SILL I LUCY TNIES 530 HANLON AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 SO 02-117-23 31 0042 00540 KEENE AVE NALKER NOTORS INC SEARS IMPORTED AUTOS INC 13500 NAYZATA OLVD HHOCTONRA m 55343 ■p . -t. TOTAL OATCH 004 00010 REPORT NO. P143540I PAGE 11 30 02-117-23 31 0020 00539 KEENE AVE 0 NARALO ERIK8EN O HARALO ERIKSEN 4219 ZEALAND AVE N MPLS MN 55420 30 02-117-23 31 0030 00520 HANLON AVE RAMONA M SLEDZ GERHARD 0 TANGER 10043 PILLSBURY AVE OLOOMINCTON MN 55420 30 02-117-23 31 0047 00450 ORONO ORCHARD RD S EDNARO H NAm EDNARO H HAItf 400 ST PETER ST ST PAUL MN 55102 • * i -It- '» «« •*5'- 1 CtRTlPY THAT TMI FACTS REPRESfNTED ARt AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REFRESENTAnON OF XNFORHAnON AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON TME MBCOROS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARVCMT OF PROPERTY TAKAnONk TO TWKDESTDEPARpCOT OF HY KNONLEDOE AND RELIEF^ / ' \ V i’’.■fi- . V t'v. r T ’ =tfc Qi •S.J <1 ••VI ■ aL.1, ' j *- ■ ’ . Itv —i,J. r\ .V '• '■'■'"■I ‘•-.h :v • KLat of Surv-7 for Cacric 2* Dettloff of Lots 1, 2, 19, asd 2C, Block 15, ydraetcska Bluffs Eeaaeplc Countj, Minnesota ■ -V 4" ‘i'V 7• r # • DtCKKMSON ' .S-; .%* * . ;*• f. • -V • •••». . • . ( . • •• •.• i* V •»* •;XW': < * * T*rir . .■ • .••.*-;u'V- ,1. ; . H i««NPV . .;A.< * .<'’7 *.' T i •* * t fry'aH 1 ■ y ■>.;4 • Cl, M5 V . • *r ^ . • r;.-. . vw * • • * . ; ' •♦ . • •• *v*. .ii .% k • •*•• ••••,'r . ■^' * »r \h .*•• • • • • ••—vl •: k •• -i *■ • • *, • .« • • • f’’ *> : . •,.... V'.• :•> A •;• *• . j^. I * • *r 1 ■% ‘ 'i* • -rf;*n ‘if .V‘ * - ■ V *'• .» «•••■• 1.-! ■•*• ■ -.T *• '. '• ' A'-Gdi^eax R. Coffla V,* a V i .• :• ** tLt!2..«• Sealar 1” - 50* Data I .iucust 10, 1961 9 ' t XroB Barker » ^ • p.. - -V ' i-.vv •.*• /- a«?ia>iu 5L*. •- '•* JELLS! & ; ;^w‘ long Lake, Mimieeoitan- •» .« "•l •• -/ - . . m • ’ 'i .‘•'^ ■ • :-.*• • ■; S -■ .1 1 ] *r*rl n‘- • ■ 4.. ,------- >4 I -hTa .s2 C!•i? •‘ .V Plat of Sin^/“7 for Cedric 2. Dettloff of Lots 1, 2, 19, asd 2C, Block 15, Hlnnetotka Bluffs Eeaaepii: Ccur.ty, Miraesota /i. r -rt'. *, ...x; .-.‘•-••h .V.* V. ♦ ..•> -V-•• • • : • ,« !• -v.- .• -f-' . V. ^ .. . V. • , ^ ill •vt . r 'i>.-pi : i. A-t *-cv; Csc^ifieata of Survor I hvobj- etrtlfy that .this ' forrof of .tho bouBdariea i^ Lots ■- *. ■ . • •-.. ;.*;•?: •*: -v.is a true and eorroet represoDtatloo' of ts r, 2, 19, and 20, Block 15, Itonatonka 0 I . Itm asrlMr iS.-. Ion* Uto, rnamote :, / / . •'’ * rr7%*-*v* .f . •;. •; 'I *.'^t a?.‘IJ'.>;Ur'• . nr?-* •“v•v >/: ,V' I .♦V '• , .• # # • . • : •> f* . •.* • uv. -rx:^ ‘ •-i -■ M LI n . baH i * ••* * %* i'i; .. r" /V* ^ %*•* T ' ♦ «^ *' • ■ * *.jt 1 I . ^‘ -- -■ * o.' -vr^wr'aVr'b-k.'TI ■m ■ f*;* Twrni'^w Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Moorse Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator September 11» 1991 #1678 Paul and Marcia Merle, 2142 Shadywood Road - Variance - Public Hearing loniiig District; LR-IC Total IiOt Area ■ 26,245 s«f« [Required 21,780 s.f.] Fsrtinsnt Ordinances A. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover within 75 to 250 setback area Area within 75 to 250 f. - 16,530 s.f. Allowed - 4,132.5 s.f. Existing ■ 8,380 s.f. or 50.7% Proposed « 6,768 s.f. or 40.9% [Note staff adjustment of applicant's original proposal that showed 6,678 s.f., staff adjusted for ufper level deck to remain along northwest side of lakeside of house as underlying slab will be removed] Total Reduction ■ 1,612 s.f. or 9.7% Section 10.03, Subdivision 14(C) Lot Coverage Total area ■ 26,245 s.f. Allowed Coverage ■ 3,936.75 s.f. or 15% Proposed ■ 2,090 s.f. or 7.9% List of Bxhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Adjacent Property Owners Acknowledgment Form Exhibit B - Description of Bequest Exhibit P - Hardship Statement Exhibit G - Applicant's Sketch/Survey Exhibit B “ Staff's Sketch/Survey Exhibit I - Elevation Exhibit J - 1 through 3 Hardcover Fact Sheets Exhibit K - Plan of Current Hardcover Exhibit L - 1 through 3 Proposed Hardcover Fact Sheets Exhibit M - Plan of Proposed Hardcover K' , t f - '.-r-DeseriptioB of Request Please refer to applicant's submittal Exhibit E. Briefly, applicant proposes a two story 22x24' addition to the east side or the existing residence. The lower level will be a two car '<2 Zoning File #1678 September 11» 1991 Page 2 I garage# the upper level a bedroom with full bath. improvement also involves a second level 8x23’ deck lalceside of the existing residence. 20' of the existing 4 1/2 wide deck will remain to provide access via a stair case at the northwest corner of the house. Review Exhibits G or H. The proposed addition that involves an extension of the lakeside of the house will not encroach in front of the average lakeshore setback line nor will it encroach a 75' setback line. The applicant proposes major removal of nonessential concrete and bituminous hardcover. The application as proposed involves an overall reduction of 9.7% hardcover within the 75 to 250 setback area. Please note the only variances required for ^liis improvement would be the approval of a hardcover variance within the 75 to 250 setback area. Isrdship 8tat Please review Exhibit F, applicant's hardship statement. In reviewing item 2 applicant has amended proposal to remove the access drive at the south side of the property. hardcover remaining is for the spillway that enters from the County drainage ditch to the lake. It should be noted that applicant's property receives drainage from^ the along the north side of 19. The catch basin to the immediate southeast of the property funnels to the drainage applicant's property. Applicant has reduced hardcover within the 250 to 500' setback area from 39.6% to 21.3%. In regard to item 5# applicant has advised staff that invalid parents will be living within their residence and that 11the ability to access the property through the existing turnaround to the upper level front door is needed to facilitate accc90S to and from residence. Access to the upper level may be often blocked by cars parked along the northerly access drive of ^■||ythe turnaround by a neighbor to immediate north. Applicants have asked to be scheduled at the Council meeting of September 23rd as the entire heating system within the residence has been removed and there is an immediate need to install the new heating system while the contractor is available and before the colder weather sets in. I SU/ch . J, ' . ■U ■ Is; '■ ■4:, : ts.■ $ ■ . ■ S ids dii i CITY OF OROHO - VARIANCS APPLICATION rr ^ Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional varia Renewal Variance Pee $100.00 (no change from original application) l^^0]»<.the''Fact Fees (Double application fee) #1 sO il22!S7Q cool HOITIS! 09/2Z' fropbrty location :P/VJ. /os^-oSite Address_tt Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) a—^ At2ch legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Phone (home) ^?3^^ Phone (work) Address (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ _ _ — Phone (home) Phone (work) n-* Address:City:Zip: '7/9/Date Property Acquired I (do) (tdT^iotrjalao own the adjacent parcels of land. (month/year) *•T 08B OP PIOPBRTT Present Zoning District Z/C-/C Present Use of Property ^esidentiaj^ Other (specify) • I ^ i - • I Estimated Construction Cost S O0O Describe request in detail: OOXND Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) Other mm'mm r BAHDSHIP 'Describe undue hardship cr practical difficulty resulting from srric enforcement of zoning regulations; ^ DBSdtlPTION OF DHOSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:^_ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ L /2*.V . ri: RBQUIRBD SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained yith property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include ^hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8*j"xll'* for reproduction)• Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 0J5"xll'*). Slcetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8J5'*xll"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. S. 8. 7. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour variance application is not complete if the above lirf—**** not beem included. AFFLZCAMT'S SIGMATDRB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses iaeurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct tatha^ beat of j;^s/her Icnow ledge. Applicant's Signature ect to,the. beat of Date S'-po- 01 —18 8Z6MAT1 ^ The owner hereby acicowledges and agrees to this application and further ‘ suthorises reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, ngnats, Coanission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga- tion and verification of this^equeat. Owner's Signature Date AM^licent snast have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled of the Plaaning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please malce arrangements to have an uuthorised agent attend in your place and to advise the Building t Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. -y- ; ‘ VT’T' 5 TAMPAVtR NM«/MM W 17>117-tS SI OQM •SSM Toeo RO R « H tSIRS •MOtL S NMIBMIT SltRS NAVIATA NN SBS91 SR 17-117-tS 4t 0011ftiM murnmum ro A N • R 7 MBMN JR RORtRT F MMSON JR IMHI/ARRR tlAO SNMVNOOR ROAR MAVIATA Ml S6S91 TAXFAVtR TAHFAVtR SR 17-U7-CS 4t OOM OtlSO RNARYMOOR RR ROMOR F HAOUl RONALR F MAOtN 1014 SNCtLStOR AVI NOFRSNR MN SSS4S SR 17-117*tS 4S 01S4 02177 SNARVNOOR RO HARR A SMIFIIARO HARR A SIKFIIARR 2177 MARVNOOO RO NAVIATA Ml SRSn « • •'MEMSFXN COUHTY PROFERTY INFORHATXON SYSTEM FROFERTY OMCRS LIST I cS I .1 i • 0 f • - > SR 17-117-2S 4i OOOf 0217R SNAOVMOOO RO CIS ANOERSON CURTIS ANOERSON 2170 SHAOYNOOO ROAO NAYZATA Ml SBS91 SR 17-117-23 42 0012 02142 SNAOYNOOO RO 1 SCNOEN A 0 A SCHOEN XRVINO 2 DORIS A SCHOEN 2142 SNAOYNOOO RO NAYZATA HN E5391 SR 17-117-2S 42 0021 OSAOl TOOO RO THOMAS L SNYDER THOMAS L SNVPER Bros HOOD OUCR CIR EXCELSIOR MN 55SS1 •v I'*. SR 17-117-2S 4S 01S7 02109 SHAOYNOOO RO SCOTT A EATON SCOTT A EATON 2109 SHAOYNOOO RO NAYZATA Ml S5S91 -> RIFORT NO. F14S1401 FACE 11 V so 17-117-2S 42 0010 02172 SHAOYNOOO RO N N S 0 R NELCH NORMAN N NELCH 2172 SHAOY NOOO RO NAYZATA MN SBS91 SO 17-117-2S 42 bOlS 0213R SHAOYNOOO RO JEROME J LAOUE • NIPE JEROME J LAOUE 21S0 SHAOY NOOO RO NAYZATA NN S539I SR 17-117-2S 42 0022 02171 SNAOYNOOO RO JACOUEIYN A RORERTSON JACOUELYN A ROBERTSON 2171 SHAOYNOOO ROAO NAYZATA Ml BBS91 ■ f TOTAL BATCH OOS 00011 ■ * 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REFRESENTEO ARE AN ACOMATE AND TRUE • _ _ REFRESENTATION OF INFORMAHON AS XT AFFEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEMCPIN COUNTY OEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TANAHON* TO THE BEST or Hf KNQNLEDGE AND KLIEF. OAlE^tiiiBBl r 4 V . :r ■ V •F *>v- c V. • * • t r V •• 2,* 'i: . »j,. 'J J•-.= I i1 V 1 ' 2 V X 3 J , <2- 17 t3 f :*i>^ ,1^^. ?J*‘vri§ «1K. turr-J m»»wi lew -» H0T 9 OLl« ^ *lOT ^l sa ■ w»c 1C » n* CDwn sumfTW lur itUL 1 J ' .>■ ^ ^ f • - ***) ^ ^ Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form ,u I (w«) 1-. l4 v: r ^ [print name(s)i of /C Sh2S'f,Ko^ci ^ A [prin- address] k F - - - I nroncsed ir.orcvement or proposed use or the Application No.• WOW^wa* -- ^ a. j d-ha-h in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am I (we) understand that i disaooroval of the property or use (are) not asked to declare . Council that I (we) am (are) aware ofs:: r-r-v^urpV.™. i*«qajLres Council approval. •I . • Property Owner tf.ii 7 /Date a^- V- 91 Property Owner DateVnh / I (we) degx;»»t<£. ^ [print naiBe(s)I of -2 I iLS^^iticxjy\ (print address) Application No I (w«) understand that •**®“‘^^|j^pp*o*al''of^tha property or use (ere) not asJced Council that 1 (w.) an (are) ««»'• “prtue-yrpla ” and that the proposed neighbor's project or requires Council approval. Date Property Date % 'rIf you have •”t‘«».n« "ht bu”1"7' .rieaeVlSVyi prior to th/ sch.dul«i ...ting date.#7^ *• Paul & Marcia Merlo 2142 Shaduvood Road Orono. MN 55391 M -"-J - WT' DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The house as it exists today has two bedrooms, one and one half baths in the living ^re^ and a sinde car, tuck-under garage. The house needs to be ej^anded to accomodate my wife and myself, one of three daughters who is in college, and my invalid parents who will be living with us for six months, including the summer months, each year. . * ■ r . : .'r-'.V .r- -• t-r-' Our plan is to add sufficient living space while at the same time reduce the total amount of hardcover on the property by over twenty two hundred and sixty square feet. We plan to add another bedroom and fuU bath over an attached two car garage on the south side of the house where the concrete pad is today. In addition, we plan to extend part of the e.\istmg four foot wide deck on the front of the house another eight feet toward the front. We will be removing all non-essential concrete and asphalt hardcover from the property. The concrete pad on the south side which was installed for storage of construction equipnient when the house was built in 1970 will be reduced by six feet. The asphalt drive on the south side will be narrowed from an average of fifteen feet wide down to ten feet. The e.xisting concrete pad along the front of the house will be eliminated. The planned stairway for the deck has also been eliminated. • , i... V'VV-^' 1 'rnim 1 ? 1 ■ ------------------------- \tM ■i.ta I ,:f 1:4 :1 ^..•2^ - k5 Paul & Marcia Merlo 2142 Shadywood Road Orono. MN 55391 (6 12)-47 1-8304 ■ ' : ’ 'I - mamm '.V'/ fi,^{.- ¥''■ HARDSHIPS 1. .,vy-£;yy [ ,,fc: ^ .: -W W The driveway to the north is shared with our neighbors. This is their only access to Shadywood Road. The driveway to the south is the only drainage for 1000 feet of Shady'wood Road north of the property. The first eight feet of this driveway drops down five feel. It cannot be used to exit the property in the winter due to icing and the blind curve on Shadywood Road to the south. 3. 4. The concrete spillway is required to prevent overflow of water onto both properties. The ground slope from north to south drops very abruptly. A turnaround is required to avoid having to back up over 200 feet uphill, around a curve. Removal of a portion of the circular driveway to the north would force a driver to back up into the neighbors’ driveway in order to exit from the house. If that drive were blocked by another vehicle or if the neighbors objected to their driveway being used in this manner, a dfiver would be forced to drive in reverse for one hundred fifty feet around a two hundred twenty five degree curve. This would be extremely difficult to do during the day and not feasible at night. The house has only a one car tuck-under garage. .'V* ■' r’ r-* ,'lL ir - Sislil5»aa^ n J ir 'KtC---; mm m P':‘‘ ,4 : mmmm 'V viipWlI wmRmMm .’iiii'ijK* mmw . ai s \ ■4s^4*-'s, mk wl ..-y :r : - >• •'' L -' f-. ’ " • • * ?• CoiU<A>T HARDCOVER CALCliLATIOH WORKSHEET ............ ScT3Ac:< ZONE: (ciRC-E ONE) (j)“75p 250-300 5'jQ-lOGQ EasTiNG Hariicoveh in Zone A. House % ..' ! B. Garage c. Driveway 0. Sidewalk Patio/Deck p. Landscape AREASUNDERLAIN BYPLASTIC SHEETING > . *>6. Other LENGTH - X - X - X - X . S.F. WIDTH S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. . S.F. «*• • «* 'S.F. s.f; S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. M. »».. M. »*• *•»• • .• S.F. S.F. • « O • S.F. S.F. V V Total Hardcover in Zone ».* ■ • Total Property A ria in Zone 7S______S.F. I a1 ££££_.‘s.f. H 7S A fTI X 100 r A/e % • •• -I- • ‘ '• *1 -r-------•c ff HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKS-iEET _ I < SETBACK 20N£: (c 1.7CLE'one ) 0-75' 75-250' J^O-bOO' 5t.’0-lC00' E xisting Hardcover in Zone ■■ A. ■ House 3S.r? LENGTH • • CC4-‘C.. f'-rT I A-., 'is X WIDTH /. o f •-,iz A3 iLV-»V‘^; ■' ■ <*•*• • •* S ■<0 X L /. o c^4^. rc4tt 3. 6 AnACE . c. D riveway .■.•■#•■ if ft ■' • ■ '■ f, ;r •;D., $IDCWALI» :__<r. 1.. IC-. -v-/-6 ■i rt fek^v ’vi ‘VfAiCC.V ,o '■:% r ■ 1 .f -E. B atio / ”D eck 'f /■, VJt- ■ ' ..ft i ■ :S ■• V U A fm'V. T L* Total Property Area in Zone /.rg-z S I FI • 4S .• S • r • s. fV yz* o s.F. S.F. /SSi.Z S.F. •••• S/So s.F. •a* • ** • • •• 7?. ^ S.F.‘ _ S.F. 22. 5 S.F. • • • AREAS UNDERLAIN nv ■ . ._X_________:_____ PLASTIC • S^iEETING X •• X • » . ^-'•ptLUlall. \. /^ZriTUPo X ^ •• Total Hardcover •. IN Zone ^ S.F. __ S.F. « __ S.F. __ S.F. :__ S.F. „ S.F. /€Z •** • . s.F. TSSO s.F. /<jr SSp .. s.F m I T3SO -r in 1°” ■Sa.7oyo • ■.- ■. *' / * x . . * ’. ,* .■ \y. My •' •■ >. f ^ . ■ - • '' i » #... t**m‘ -V;F"1 • ••• • ••• I mi^ 'i] .1. J'i ■■{: ‘W .’1 ■ ' r' 'ij’' f ■■ /V r* ■ V- .‘i ? • HAP,DCOVi.= CALCUWTICH HORKSKHET ssT3Ac:< zone: (C!SCL£ o:ic) Q-'S' .2S0-5C0'JGO-iCGG; Existing HASDCG'/ta in Zone A. ■ House 3. Garage c. Driveway £. Patio/ Deck m n' f 0’,: f < M F. Landscape AREAS underlain PLASTIC SHEETING 'A-.- G. Other LENGTH D.. Sidewalk i X WIDTH X X _ X X _ X - X _ X X - X _ X X X ‘-I'i . .-tr'-i ■ •'''■■■ S. r I S. r . • • • S.r . . S.F. S.r. S.F. /2 fo S.Fr • • *‘ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. -S.F. S.F. S • ? • S.F. S.F. S.F. Total Hardcove.r in Zone - Total Property Area im Zone /ZfO /Z/o JoSo i /• ‘ /.I : 7-/r-7, S.F. S.F. x'lOO -• 4»# 3~-3 A [3 S9, €7 % M«»* * • . •• #••• • •••* . •• • ••• /. I ^/o /U> Co t^O^ 5^0. C€0*ii^ ”T f^PH-/^ L~r .a^r.y'/a >. t^A f. • • - -^. .4 pV ‘;.. • • • CoiUbc^T HuA.^CQV£?. CALCUL<;TIQfrrtORKSH££T ... .... / __^ 7^ 7c«?cn^ '7cn_c,7n/ rnn.Tnrr.'S£T3AC;< ICNS: (crSCLc ONc; villi/ /-—u --J -LJ --- — E xisting HARncovs?. in Z cne • 9% • A. House « :m . . . ' ,v ■ < V * .. . . '.r ,•,. ‘ ^r* •■ -r- ■■ J.-\- :- ‘, V 5>*'- , ■ f-- ,;B. Garage c. Driveway 0. Sidewalk e. Patio/ Decx r.Lamoscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING C0jt>r. s. Other . LENGTH X - X _ X _ X ss S • r 1 WIDTH • a S.P. • • S« F • 3 ..S.F, S.F. SS ’ # S'.P. . * _ S.F« •• • •• • * ’ • a * - «Sa F ■ •s.?r a • ■_ S.P, •• s S.P, - S« r • 4 J-t •. •«..•.>• •» •• •••• «• • *••• • H1SIS« F • • ^ .. • S.P. a««. * . s S.P. /• « • • ”7>- • • Zone -7r S.P,1IIIr l-s.,. 7-/ B a S 4 €S X 100 /. /z. • % f • - M 1 •I .* •• .• • • • ■ - ^ ^ ■- ■ t • . ^ • • * • M ’< 1 s •.y?.ZCZ'‘'zr. liL—LAi.-.l .iCr..<i.*^ jv P-iinj-CA -z:ti: '.c:?.CLl :n *.' C-“' r~-'--V ti:fr:;is :-;ar:::’'5s :.m i:.'ie "wrlio S ATt'" Lakt Hinnck- dhZSl jI- V. •I IW W « 44. ay :A:/lolci/Wfl n '^M<rr>: Ccnt^<o-b 3 • 5/%A nis J)c4-0 c. D rivshay L. 3-0 - > «’v- ^ Dec< as f.U noscaps aubas unochuain 3Y PUkSTtC SHfiSriNe N/ . ^ • -? = ?(!:T>i V aa.o ^ar- 3„=. » /.o ^5 • ..A,' /\ V /■3 54'-(' • s.?. Y /•o /»^.0 ' s.A, V 3^?'7' ..R. Y/V yy • S. r • /% Y /^. (t? *39-s.f. 7.S .s.?. Y a /84 s.?. <-7 ^ -f. Y s.?. Y - S.r. Y J S#?« Y • • S.f. Y 1 • • • • a.r. X /.o /6<^ S.r. IaM • htte - IM ZflNE /(aS30 s.r. “T- /(..530 X 7nn « ^ V5.7 I . 'i VI • i'ln % tttUtkjaaniBiitaia iiBL 'j iiU • •» *t Pjtc^<^ H.ARi:c:v£r. ';l::l-.ticm wcr:<:hc-T--------^ --♦{£• 'z’-.CLl -MS) . :-i-- v--’^ " L-xISTIng HAsnccvss tji Icfie «House » '1 3. Ga;^ag£ c. D rivehay D. Sidewalk g. P atio/ Decx R. Landscape AREAS underlain PtASTtC SHESriNG 8. Other LTIGTH X - X - X '■ A ^ - X 3. r I XtOTH m «a • r • S« r • Sir* S.r. S.r. s.r. S.r. w ^-3 * Total ’Hardcover in Zone - \ ^ ^ Total Property A rea in Zone 3DS(3 _ i±j> -"'^4 ■ Ufi.. ■'*• \^' V > ■■n- >ij ■> ■; ^■‘- f Vi - ... 'Lr mmm i*II■m:iimsim?sm rv. . /./ . t I t i :!;< » -.• :• \ • • i • ; • ♦If .•■^•K- r-'-* fei'" €/Z. ":-^i ' Aj2S‘/^S 6S is C 0^c£~r‘0'0 ) H'O. Y % rUcy,.T^-'^ V . ^ •►*• L./¥'^. 7f'^ / /) <P/JZ / i - - .1 • -■4.- •.' W- ---"p--- — - .4l^i«>lJ •'»’?• "V TOs Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron# Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Datat September 11# 1991 Snbjacts #1679 William Miller, 2691 Casco Point Road - Variance - Public Hearing Sonlng Districts LR-IC, Single family lakeshore residential, 1/2 acre, unsewered ■fi i it ^ppliestioiit Request for hardcover variance to construct a new 20* X 34* garage. Variance for structural maintenance of existing "bathhouse" in O-TS* zone. t*I* ' ~PsrtiasBt code Sections •r*.'1. 6^' Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 limits hardcover in the 0-75' and 75-250* zones. .i.l V ' i 2. W ' Section 10.55, Subdivision 26 (B) states* "No structural alteration or addition to any non-conforming structure over the life of the structure shall exceed 50% of its value at the time of its becoming a non-conforming use, unless the structure is permanently changed to a conforming use or unless the alteration or addition would substantially reduce potential flood damages for the entire structure." List of Bxhibits %>■ - ■ ■ : / , * >- ■ n Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit X - Exhibit J - Application Plat Map Property Oimers List Hardship Statement Survey Site Plan/Hardcover Calculations, Existing Site Plan/Hardcover Calculations, Proposed Garage Construction Plan Staff Sketches of Gazebo Inspector*s Motes •f'-. 5* Pertinent Facta 1.The existing followst and proposed hardcover is summarized as 0-75* 75-250* 250-500* BxiStine1:5%Proposedirn Allowed 37.0% 4.4% 30.2% 4.4% nJT 25% 30% \ If 2. 51 \ ' • Applicant proposes to remove existing 14* x 22* garage and revert that area to grass. Construction of a new 20* x 36* garage will be over existing gravel driveway area. A 156 s.f. portion of the gravel area will also be removed. I- -W: d • ti A ‘i Zoning File #1679 September Hr 1991 Page 2 of 3 3. ::: The applicant had applied for a garage construction permit in mid-August. When the Building Inspectors visited this site as part of their hardcover review, they found major work being done on the "bathhouse". While applicant states that the work was merely replacement of siding, the Building Inspectors found that virtually all structural members and the foundation were in the process of being replaced. The second story gazebo structure was supported by 4 new posts on top of new footings, and these posts were open rather than enclosed. The applicant was advised by the Building Inspectors and the Zoning staff that this work could not continue and that a variance would be needed to do anything other than replacement of siding, but that the work the Building Inspectors found far exceeded that cosmetic work. Three weeks later. Inspector Lyle Oman found that the structure had been completely enclosed with no approval to do so. Dlsensslon Given the requirements of Section 10.55, Subdivision 26 (B), staff feels that this work was in direct violation of the letter and Intent of that section in that virtually every structural aspect of this 8' x 8* building (i.e. replacement of foundation, beams, posts plus new siding and a door unit) constitute a structural alteration certainly in excess of 50% of the original value of the structure. The Assessor's records do not acknowledge the existence of this 8* X 8* structure although it shows up on the 1968 survey, hence it likely was never assumed by the Assessor to have a significant value. In the* past City staff's position on structures such as this has been that mere cosmetic repairs such as re-siding or re-roofing have been permitted only to the extent that such work does not include repair to structural members (i.e. one can re-side or re-roof, but replacement of posts, foundations, joists or roof boards requires variance approval for continuing a non-conforming structure in the 0-75' zone). This interpretation evolved because Section 10.55, Subdivision 26 relies on having baseline valuation data which is often not available for this type of lakeshore structure. r; ¥. In the past, the City has in virtually identical situations, required the removal of such structures as they deteriorated. Given the total replacement of the first floor of the structure in question, staff feels that there is no question that the current work far exceeds the 50% allowance for structural maintenance based on a 1975 value. (1975 is the date in which the current Code containing a 75* setback requirement for principal and accessory structures, was adopted. In fact, a 75' setback ordinance was first edited in October of 1973.) ' .y ■■Ck Zoning File #1679 Septei^er 11# 1991 Page 3 of 3 Zasnes to Consider 1.Does the removal of an existing one-*stall garage and a portion of gravel driveway, resulting in a net decrease in hardcover from 37% to 30.2% in the 75-250' zone# justify granting of a hardcover variance for construction of the garage? Are there any additional areas of hardcover that could be removed to reasonably further reduce the hardcover percentage?ws Given the clear intent of Section 10.55# Subdivision 26 (B) that non-confirming structures in the 0-75' zone should eventually disappear# is there any justification to (after- the-fact) grant a variance for virtual replacement of this 8* X 8' bathhouse/gazebo structure? Options for Psrn—endation 1. Approval as proposed. Partial approval# specifying conditions or limitations. Denial. f, '4 Other. 3 •Li^ - A St . ■ I- aJ; V., -Jvi"- : V ■: '.r ■■ V.'Vi*,’ wm fm mm ^'ii-S-.- ■ ■ 0k . r .■4V:mM V;>- i m r^m w "•3 cm OF OROHO - VARIWfCB APPLICATION Initial Application Pee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) j^^0]^.>rhe**Fact Pees (Double application fee) #1 .0V V O' /:! Ijl Vi t:>AVi PROPBRTy LOCATION Site Address ^G>9/_Zh/JT' (p.i.D.) 7-* rAcJv Tdantification Number (P.I.D. J --- - - - - - - - Attub 1.9«1 d..cription to application if not included on required survey. _ _ _ _ xJM raiWft’ilrOS/?!' cwrc^f APPLICANT Name CL*^A Phone (home) ^7/ —■ Phone (worlc) 7 Address:/r" City; ; (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ - - - - - Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:. City:Zip: :^uJfT 9/'Date Property Acquired I (do) adjacent parcels of land (month/year) PNI8IHT 08B OF PIOPBRT7 Present Zoning District Present Use of Property _Residential Other (specify) nSCRZPTXCNI OP RBQOBST Oeaeribe requ StuSTjjltA request in detail: Estimated Construction Cost $ 9 OOO— •>. ................................................ ^ J-9 ■>r ; , , - ‘ .'-‘l ■• '"’m- Lot Area Lot Width '^-X- Front Side ■r- i';• *' Setback Variances ( jtrAiAct Rear*) Other ^ /e «. .4 ^ ^ Jm f ^ • % BMU)SHIP piHy*ttT5?Tnii OF nwnsnAl. PROPBRTy CONDITIONS ir~^enAt9M?nWt^ Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning 1. 2. 3. 4. S. 4. 7. SD SUBMITTALS Completed Application Fonn-^ Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8Jj"xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any change^ in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8J5"xll'*). Slcetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy aJj^xll").^ As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list^f any other persons you wish notified of this application. ^ Additional items as may be requested by City staff. Tha Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please TMOTihir that vour variance application is not complete if the above been included. BfBLZCAVT'S SIGMATUIB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or CeQUested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee paymenw) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application^,,-and certifies that the information •ttpplied is true and correct to the best of hi//her knowledge. ^and cei 3st or his, Date aa./y/ . n i sxoamiu The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further etherises reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, Ikfents# CoBBiisi^on members^ and Councll^j^obers for purposes of investiga- W' S 1 ^ s hien and verification of this request. ! 'A Owner's Signature Date lUplicant mnst have all subadttals into the City offices 25 days before the Manning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the Mird Monday of ekeh month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled p^imv ms stings of'the Planning 'Cosmdssioa and Council. If an applicant is Ci^le to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an IlgUiorlSAd in your plACo wid to advise the Buildia^ ® Zoning Kfiee of this change prior to the meeting. i •' K* i- mm .AiA- \\K ’’ • '• * n* • • I ,«i \. *t< 0^ •’ « . •.« ‘f..v # I ' • , » * t • •• •■':• ■ i;. .'/’ • ^ •• • *! ■ . '■ . ■• ■. \'V‘- .•?; . • -i ' t*• • ' • ^ • • ■■•:••,'• :• • i •><'••■ •:> V . 1 <■ ; y;l ’ •; # *. • V. lOMCliS tAit 16424 ;r”w8«k eoii; A . ^ A . & $4y SIISS C 9 CASCd***"*POINT RO T/>7^nrT!yiiffragWii^ar ra. pjL I / •■■;’■ I ,s ‘ <S|«« j 40 H 9)'l •'nnsMtp ’s suaom ion, stvinem 2m oimm ' .}'«• ‘1 ;y.??5^v -• ': vVrv. m- .6:. ’msstis svjl Of sfotm K ion • :-A -J V- •* ■ •■* \•'i% '1' •ili ■1 V J .m AikiJhi*Ok.n9us) MM Mif UTCN NOtCNN COUNTY MOKRTV XNFORHATION SYSTEM raOPERTV OMNERS LIST TMMAVnimm/iuun t. M tt-117-tS ES 0001 OEMS CASCO ROWr RO •EVERiY SNERtlNB •EVERLY SMERLINB ESSE N UKE or 1SU8 PKMY HRLS tM 6S40S SO E0-117>n ES 0004 •EAOT CASCO rOtNT RO ARC KANE A lAMIEICE KANE EA07 CASCO ROnir RO NAVZATA MN BSSfl •r V OMCR NAME TAMRAYIR SO Ei*U7>CS ES.OOEl OEMS CASCO romr so OENNETT C OOMCY A NIFE * ' i . SO E0-117-E3 ES OOOE OE«n CASCO POINT RO NULXAM P HXUER NIUXAH F HIUER C«n CASCO POINT RO NAVZATA MN B5S41 SO E0-117-ZS ES OOOS 0E71B CASCO POINT RO T A 0 ERNIN TERRY A A DOROTHY L ERNIN E71S CASCO POINT RO NAVZATA MN BSSn SO E0-117-ES E4 0001 0E4O4 CASCO POINT RO THEODORE C OANTIS DAVID RUNKLE E404 CASCO POINT RO NAVZATA MN S5S91 SO E0-117-ES E4 OOEl 0Z710 CASCO POINT RD C H A 0 J PALMER CURTIS H A OARDARA J PALMER E710 CASCO POIHT RO NAYZATA IM SSSn REPORT NO. PACE P14SE4S1 SS SO E0-117-ES ES OOOS 0EA95 CASCO POINT RO 0 A P LEE PATRICIA R LEE E645 CASCO POINT RO NAVZATA MN SSS41 SO E0-117-ES ES OOEO 0E477 CASCO POINT RD TYRfME A OUCEY A NILA OUCEY TYRONE A A MIU OUCEY EA77 CASCO PT RO NAYZATA m B5S91 SO E0-117-ES E4 OOOE OEMO CASCO POINT RO V A 0 DULLER VERNON J DULLER EAAO CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA IM SSSOl SO E0-117-ES E4 OOZE 0E700 CASCO POINT RO 0 P DUESIN8 A L R RUMUNO OANXEL OUESXNO/LXNOA Rl E700 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA m BSSn ^ k - . ■ ' ii-riliiili'iiTAlAif.i II irt I ».T *4 iiiiiiflfnntiiiiliinjh'fli lit 7 •/ DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS: ; j f o r/ . i ,<r\-< ^ / --w ) ■ • O V Garage: The property as improved in 1968, has a hardcover percentage for the 75’ to 250' zone of 377.. I am requsetlng to build a new garage on existing hardcover(what is now the entrance/turnaround and parking for the existing one car garage). The net effect f this proposed garage will actually reduce the hardcover percentage in this zone from 377. to 30.2%. This reduction in hardcover results from the reduction of the current parking/turnaround area as well as the removal of the existing garage. However, this new hardcover percentage is still in excess of the 257. allowed by current ordinances for this zone. Therefore, I need a variance in order to pull a permit for this improvement to my property. lif Bath House: The sideing on the bath house is deteriorating. I want to clean up the look of my property and lake shore. However, the current ordinances restrict the work on existing structures within the 0 to 75' zone on lake shore property. I am in the process of repainting my house and want to paint the bath house as well. However, because the sideing is deteriorating if I paint it, it will just peel off. Therefore, I am requesting a variance so I can pull a permit to allow me to clean up the bath house. €. frr' pRCPerTTY OP, ; 7xnt» } I« *ax Z32» Caaeo ?alat« 3crlag ?ar^. '.tl-’ie—o»j i:- ■ *.hat 7f ?ar»»^ Ljfe A,iian Ai Zjlsg bcTuwm Csnao At*, lad Laka .Misaatoiika, asd bat ■M^ two h I i vlJi tka Jootharly Ilaa of I«ot 1^ la Sprlaf Park, and distant Scatbari^ tbarafroi raspaetiralj 30%0 fast sad ?0.0 faat* Also ’aovb as Lot 2, Aoditera SabdlariJiaa 265* 3aaaapla Conatp f I a' % V ! > X * i ;• V> «y f-; I 1 if. »i .. '■..<• -ijSflKr .4 i %r • *• • • fc*. • “s* ••*v T • • A a o • • . - .• • » a«• . CZmPICATB OF LOCATION OP BUILDING I htnkr Mrtilp tkM «a___'^vUli 19 .„:atf. aLoSm? ^ iMMtoa 9i ^ aialAist<a) m ste CZBX9XCATS or sumr M____^ •n V ; ‘o ••• ** • •» I 1 V ‘ a % 4.’ BalkHaaOl Is csmMij ilMim 4«Himiy uA tksi Um iMsaoa otf Mid »♦ « • • *1 0 • • • • • •• ' * • T* v‘*. f’ ,'CMN i. Wf S. *<tOISr5«T3 auaVKYOR. No. 4409 •V £ pi AS /See /A 7 -Ld^:5/^/^^r'44- i4if ji • .•.*•• • Ii5tr*3 '^(V* -• i( o/o /Co / ;= y^'oojx^- ^S '• ■^i 0'=(,-^y^ y / \ ^, to ^ ^ yoroo .(,o .cco') = (OO0- — yiOt^ 7 7 i^Oc> ~q^H!i~~ •i^''zfi(''»"A jO =zzs 7\J.i^ <Tr> * g ^ous^ .=^^/4.t, i?- P^r,o , 70^ ^■*^<i£-C ,y\:^,) = j^g jj. <rJ7A.9Jcjf^ ( 3 6.0< ^ ’*■ ( ' J X XJl 7 •^' f4i/f0 b£iiJ^JyiO C'o sks'r') ~ rfp ^ Mo '-4> g /M/cO bAu/c^y <'O, S'y^yo) tfALlo -&- /or' /t>^ /oT^iv (^x^sMy^ym/}cav(^. vyj9- /yy?A o co\j<^'/f ^______ ( ^K^S7~yJ^r 7- JH/>gA7^~ /y»oo ^ a.»^ J ?> ^ r YS'CO - ■:^C:±fV - 3r/o J ■= 37 -V. -^V _ ✓or'-i i/^c3o ^ .. C^<: c t^CAT/o^ C.f^yfj6'^ -<j> M^Cx>L/^^ To /<eo/^-^ 77^ ’• ..I 'i . r / Ajor /9jt^/9 faf\ — ^^ J'oo ■i^w^ ^("/o x-ioO = iooB- - (iO Wl^T i. = •'t’OO >7 yo^ TVfo/bi^d A//9A*> cot/Si (Ji7-//A/j-tJ cy-7X'it ('yjcyy = ^ — yj. v0^ A/y , c7> /yotA^^" CiA,Sxy^,s^ /^7'yo (/y ' AJ- ') s/o^j^ixs (sx'xr) */<At/ (xt*KyvO f jt.* St.. - ^/i4 r /6' x^y/; - 7<? - //fe = CfO - XV/ IJ C'O.SaS?)= X^T 4Eh xso'-k z f^^’O tx/Cftiru^y ^ /o.Xk yo'^ i^yy ^ yoi' /oX To/yy^L /y^Ocoi/bTt. Mc/'oiS'O i£>£jS^ T. (yyyuujj^^ J,rM - j^o.i> ^ - -io. 3" ' - 2,/? 4-yroo = xr* 7S^—xio — ■7‘/£>/S’oo 3= Jo. ”“ /dX *r i-VOo -----CjlT= ofiy ’^z-'A-.A. —- f\j /' __I 7 N •* .V.VI-r¥:\: r “ # •>. :>■¥ F rib r HARDCuVEOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET 7^ ^ ^ E'<ISTING Ha RDCQV c S IN ZoNE A. H ouse /bA7W B. Garage c. D riveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio / D eck F. Landscape AREAS underlain BY PLASTIC SHEETING 6. Other LENGTH /3 ' . ■ // WIDTH // 3> 250-5C0' SCO'-ICCO' • „ S. f". . S.F. //3. S.F, S.F. S.F. 1 ^• 4 r "j '> V • ' k'- *4 S.F. S.F. * S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. • • ^ Total ^H ardcover in Zone - ----— Total Property Area in Zone £ I • f t • - 7 i " iTioo - S'. S' '% i : I . tr* rtttfjlftirirn ) • HARDCOVE-. C.;LCUWTI0N WORKSKHI / S£T3AC:< ZONE: (CIHCLH ONE) 0-75r 75-250'250-5CQ' 5GQ-iCC0' E xisting Hardcover in Zone A. House LENGTH X B. Garage 2_0 c. Driveway -T7 3 (=> /5 D. Sidewalk ------------ E. Patio / Deck r/ F. Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY , . PLASTIC SHEETING 6. Other > r //S.F. WIDTH S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 3C?S f r • /CD V/ S.F. * ^ S% S.F. 3 /SZ>S.F. S.F. S.F. *70 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. Total "Hardcover in Zone - 3. _s .f. /O/SO^ S.F.Total Proper W Area in Zone - |~a| -3-B?c> 4[Y|'iTiOfl =■ 27' '% ' j 1. HARDCOVE- CALCULATIOtl .. iS^O__ scT3Ac:< zone ; (c :scls one ) 0-73' (^230>>230-3CO' 3C0-1C00' Existing Hardcoves in Zone ■ A._ X _/ 0 3 s.F. LENGTH X WIDTH S.F. • - X . . S.F. • •• • » ^ X S.F. - X as S.F. R. GaRA^F _ X 1L.C>^0 S.F. • r. nRiVP’*^AY >b 7 X /c>.^ *,r?p s.F. /7ccr'r)ct,r-c>c.^c<. X /c=>^yy s.F. n. ^rnpwAi<« ^ —X 1If1s.F.' . X s.F. X ^ S.F. E. Patio/ Deck X 5^ =.70 s.F. • - e.f AwnsrAPP X • S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY X a S.F. PLASTIC • • SHEETING X a S.F. • ■ •• •* « * •X S.F. % G. Other X"S.F. Total "Hardcover in Zone - —— s.f. - ' /O Sc^O s.F.Total Propertt Area in Zonc E ^ I A I B '/OX 100 * 3C)m IX ^/o I 1 I ; i ^ J W’ ■' A' . MRDCOVE?. aiCULATIOfl WCSKSKEHT cx/^r/J/^ £/’■r-o/icS&/{'Jc, SETBACK zonej (ciecle one ) 0-75' IS^TS^'(^250-5C0^5G0-lCCQ ' Existing H ardcjvee in Zone A . H ouse X . • s S.r LENGTH WIDTH • X Sir. • - X _a S.F. •.I X _ ■ m • • S.F. - X s S.F. 3.G arage - X a S ■ r ■ C.H r r VPWAY /(O . X = /o^S.F. . X 3 • S.F. D. • SrnEWALK , X S • r • X a S.F. X a S.F. E.^ATIO/ D eck X S.F. p.IANnscAPe X • a S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY X S F. PLASTIC SHEETING X • ♦ S.F. ...................*-• X S.F. • • G. Other X'■ *■S.F. •• ““TofAL" H ardcover Total Property Area • ^ m IN Zone S.F. 1 • IN Zone -'"xy<Dc>S.F. - Ti - 4 fB". y*. ‘ * .1 \ .jj* .. •. Vi . '. i * ' N V ^ i \ • •V - *f* N ' i ,».«.• n ■ •■'J : I ! i i t i ' i « J l:"- .r .. • • . • ;• . .** j •i. •*•* ^ t •- v; • . : = .. . /i‘ f*. . Jt ' • V • • •^ •■ V.?:r'4JS:r:.v-^ r^/ ^rr.nj fc ry . \ . I . V s* • 1 i-..;• ••! . < V <r;v..y-'•■■ .!t| *» 2 ' j . [ ■• * ■ ;.;-.>.jS -..1 .’ ! . 1 . * *#■ y • • 5 •=•■:--;1I.-; .... •} *.* ’. I- . I I nizUix - "^7/. 7j'p? / /?#✓ jit'Z,I t/" jjotf^v y" "•/'>' .JLui-^) O 1^ S ^ JI ^ /^ / (*, O '*?' eLr^-* n p. o f* " /) /j " ^.4^ »4«.^ ^ ^0m4rn^i V ;v-i> I • ; y V y * " •m \ % • ' • • • •••• • - ft ,• • * *• • •• I . \ »•* ..•'«# ••• T • . .* • '• ,■ •• .•*. .,• ••••fw* * r r •• •-.S'-'sV •• *v- • . ; ,*•••* > ' *' •* ,*.-••• • .» • - k *r ; * • • . ■ * . ..4. . • r.-V w... a:*:*. • >• *•♦.Tt • • V ‘ #r * • »,• *4^z‘*'4» ^ • «••*,? • • •••■.'• ^ • . * ••.* • . i • . , . ■ • , ■ ., ' ' . 1 • • • ■jJL" •• • •/ '•t'*! .* • 'V ’ V • *v , • 1 . •• • ^ * “. • • , *'• • * • . , *, • / * ... • - • ' - . * - * * \ s ^ Cfl- P *•• •»• • • •'j* • ■•%• * f •. • •• ». • • - ^ • «• , • . *. •, - • - '••' %-! r * ' r . • . ■ 4.^ * • *♦ n*T-* * .**'•/•’■ ;■' --------------• ■.■■'• • • ,••• ■.'.•• ::.• ■..v.:-i, ■■ • • . t • .* • • • » /.•••#V . . \ MsCd TO FILE: PROM: DATE; RE: 8/14/91 8/20/91 8/21/91 9/11/91 2691 Casco Point Road Lyle Oman# Building Official September 12, 1991 Work after a Stop Work Order Received permit application Bruce Vang and I visited site to review hardcover calculations. Found carpenters working on gazebo on lakeshore. New foundation and 4 new corner support posts were installed. The garage slab forms were also in place. We explained to the carpenters that they were in violation of City ordinances and the building code because they were working within 75' of the lake without a building permit. A stop work order was posted and they were informed they were to stop work on the gazebo and the garage. The homeowner Bill Miller came to the office first thing in the morining. I spoke to him about t’..e need for variances to continue work on the gazebo and hardcover problems relating to the garage. I soon brought Jeanne Mabusth and Michael Gaffron into the conversation/ and it was made very clear to Mr. Miller that variances would be re:^uired to work on the gazebo. Michael Gaffron requested photo's of the gazebo. When I arrived on site, I found the lower section of the gazebo had been completed/ stud wallS/ siding and a door had been installed. 1 1 To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Dat,e:September 6, 1991 Subject:#1682 Christine Brickley, 3262 North Shore Drive Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-lC-1, Single family lakeshore residential, 1/2 acre, unsewered Application: Request for variances to construct oversi2ed accessory structure (garage) Variances Required 1.Accessory structure footprint area in excess of 1,000 s.f. on lot less than 2 acres in area (Section 10.03, Subdivision 8 (C) (2). Lot is 0.28 acres. 2.Proposed detached garage of 1056 s.f., if allowed, would require 30' setbacks from lot lines (Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C) (3) (A). Proposed/"as poured" setbacks: West side: 3.33* South (rear): 2.56' Required: 33' 3.75-250' hardcover in excess of 25% allowance (Section 10.22, Subdivision 2) Pre-existing hardcover; 46.5% Proposed hardcover: 50.6% Note: 0-75' hardcover is 15.6% where none is allowed. 4.Lot coverage in excess of 15% allowance (Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (O). Pre-existing lot coverage: 17.5% Proposed: 19.8% fbirdship Statement Please see applicant's Letter of Request. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Application Plat Map Property Owners List Letter of Request 1 f- Zoning File #1682 September 6, 1991 Page 2 of 3 Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Survey Staff Survey/Hardcover Review Before/After Hardcover Proposals Municipal Sewer Location Diagram Garage Plan Submitted Inspection Notice 8/22/91 Discussion Applicant demolished the pre-existing 20* x 24' garage and removed from the site a pre-existing 10' x 20' shed/barn structure without obtaining the necessary demolition permit. This came to the attention of City staff when applicant was found to be pouring a slab on the property August 22, 1991. The ^1^^ was half poured when discovered by the Building Inspector and a Stop Work Order was immediately posted. However? because concrete for the remainder of the slab was on the way and could not be returned, applicant was allowed to pour the remainder of the slab at applicant's risk. Applicant was advised that there is no guarantee that the slab and/or any garage proposed to be constructed on it, would meet the Code requirements, and continuing work was entirely at the applicant's risk. Applicant immediately ordered survey work, and upon submittal of the survey, as anticipated by staff, the proposed work did not meet Code in many respects. Staff review of the survey and field measurements indicate that the existing house was not accurately plotted by the surveyor in relation to the normal shoreline. Staff has slightly redrawn the shoreline to reflect field conditions, as well as confirm and correct the insufficient hardcover data supplied by the applicant. The C3'.y has to date not required permits for sidewalks, surfacing of driveways, or other grade level concrete pours, although quite often such work places a property owner in violation of the hardcover ordinance. Since construction of the garage itself had not been started nor were there garage construction materials on the site, technically the work to date did not need a permit. In this respect, the application for garage construction is not after-the-fact. The Building Inspectors have indicated that it may be feasible to cut away portions of the slab and make use of the remainder using certain construction techniques. The Planning Commission should not therefore necessarily make the assumption that the slab would have to be enti.'.ely redone if some portion of the proposed work is approved. iiniiir ir i I Zoning File #1682 September 6, 1991 Page 3 of 3 Issues to Consider 1.Is there any reasonable justification to allow a garage of any size to be located 2-3' from the rear and side lot lines? A garage 0-750 s.f. in area would normally require 10' setbacks from the side and rear lot lines for this lakeshore lot. A garage 751-1000 s.f. would require 15' setbacks. 2.Because the lot is only 0.28 acres in area, is there any justification to grant a variance to allow an accessory structure in excess of 1000 s.f. footprint? 3.Is there any justification to allow lot coverage by structures to increase from 17.5% pre-existing to 19.8%, when the Code only allows 15%? Does the intent to provide enclosed storage for collector cars, masonary construction equipment, and other items currently stored outside on the property, justify the size garage proposed? Is the single large garage structure more appropriate for the site than a number of smaller buildings, from a visual perspective? Note that the applicants propose to remove the tin shed remaining on the property. 4.Is there any justification for approval of a hardcover increase from 46.5% (including the tin shed, old 20' x 24' garage, and old 10' x 20' barn) up to 50.6% in the 75-250' zone? Is there additional hardcover in the 0-75' or 75-250' zones that can be removed to mitigate the additions? Note that the driveway and parking area is part of a shared loop driveway serving two other residences. Options for Reconmendation Planning Commission might wish to consider the following possible recommendations: 1. Denial. 2.Partial approval, subject to limitations on garage size, location and/or concurrent hardcover removals (specify those conditions). 3.Approval as proposed, with or without additional conditions. 4.Table, giving applicant direction as to what type of plan revisions might result in a positive recommendation . 5. Other. Isv Ik 1 V 1 f' I bS-^ CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Eee ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee SIOO.OC (no change from original application) ^ After-the-Fact Fees (Double applicaticn fee) T £J ' .\^ T: ft -J PROPERTY LOCATION Site OeitAfe----------------------- .I.D.) ni?-n-7-.3.-^-4i - 0^8 rrrv nc nonxmI I u* unw’itu ProDertv Idontification Number (P.I.D.) Oy^/I / ------FinANlE OFFIlE A^ac^Lgal description to application if not inclnded on ^ required survey. __________________USlOO APPLICANT Ncune . f u ^ r.W YOUPhone (home)—M /^ ^ROl TIU5 ^^ckXs<j _________Phone (work) U*7/~~^*3S^/ /»0/"?7/C vC*/ £.^/ / hJ> Or- _ City: Qnnx.Q------- zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT OSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property -'■0 Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $- - - --- - Describe request in *;V\gcS U3 aXUS 5 VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front mea Other ■ - -*■*"*- HARDSHIP ...Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting rrcm strict ^ enforcement of zoning reculaticns; —tyi —- - - - DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS ^ ^ Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zc -tde Requirements: Cl- -0\JX^ ^ ^ _a£jL^iiJoJl2=i. JlEQUIRro SDBMITTids fb UIRED Comoleted Application Form . Certified Property Owners List of owners within liO' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). ^ Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8*i"xll for reproduction). . , Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8J«"xll"). Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll'’). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list o any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not_complete—if—the—above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE . The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required^ or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staf^ time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this a^lication, and certifies that the information supplied is true and coraj^t^^ the best^f his/her knowledge.'' ^ Applicant's Signature Date OfmERS SIGNATURE ^ k The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission member^and Council^jiembers for purposes of investiga-agents tion and verificatio Owner's Signature ;his request Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applican r^^r\z\d \Ve« aVef/rn^fourp ’it^' ^^o* a”d^^^e“t\%"Sbr .^rnin^ Office of this change prior to the meeting. i r (maxwell t-1 c\j •nr: mr- O') o ij-i 00 *:• .=‘■-‘-1,: •3'i • • • •• • •••• «. . “rf*uV *. . /• \ • v,v . •-* • :i; • r • VV; • •• . r ^ f. •• '.• ■ •■ •’■.'•ft''-' • 4 # *• ‘ 4 * . .i • t’p;:: »■^.1' •• i*. .« ** »*-4* I tlk i' •••• • • 4 •• • S'.•VV'S-- 0^ .'.'f RUN DATE OB/tl/n HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 01«IERS LIST BATCH 001 PROP AOOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 OS-117-23 41 0005 03240 NORTH SHORE DR L HORK I 0 HORK LARRY HORK C/0 NORTH SHORE DR MARINA 3222 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 PROP AOOR QNNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 08-117-23 41 0008 03262 NORTH SHORE DR CHRISTINE M BRICKLEY CHRISTINE M BRICKLEY 3262 NORTH SHORE DR HAY^ATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 41 0006 03250 NORTH SHORE DR L HORK A 0 HORK LARRY HORK C/0 NORTH SHORE DR MARINA 3222 NORTH SNORE DR ORONO MN 55391 38 08-117-23 41 0009 03268 NORTH SHORE OR RONALD D STAUFFER RONALD D STAUFFER 3268 N SHORE DR HAYZATA MN 55391 REPORT NO. PI435401 PACE 1 3 33 06-117-23 41 0007 03260 NORTH SHORE DR VERA M HARTIN JAMES J DUr«4 3224 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 38 08-117-23 41 0010 03290 NORTH SHORE DR RITA M STRALEV R M A S E STRALEV 5034 TUXEDO BLVO HOUND MN 55364 >1 r 38 08-117-23 41 0011 38 08-117-23 41 0012 38 08-117-23 44 0001 b-PROP ADDR 03286 NORTH SHORE DR 03324 NORTH SHORE DR 03264 NORTH SHORE DRi-QNNER NAME RITA M STRALEY MINNETONKA PROPERTIES INC RICHARD 0 NORUM ET AL ..TAXPAYER R M t S E STRALEY JAMES J DUrt4 RUSSELL A NORUM ;NAME/ADDR 5034 TUXEDO BLVO 3224 NORTH SHORE OR 15500 HAYZATA BLVO UNIT MOUND MN 55364 ORONO MN 55391 HAYZATA MN 55391 r' * r 38 08-117-23 44 0004 38 08-117-23 44 0018 PROP ADDR 03302 NORTH SHORE DR 03280 NORTH SHORE OR ONNER NAME MINNETONKA PROPERTIES INC RITA M STANLEY TAXPAYER JAMES J DUNN R M A S E STRALEY TOTAL BATCH 001 NAME/ADDR 3224 NORTH SHORE DR 5034 TUXEDO BLVD ORONO MN 55391 MOUND MN 55364 '-■xi rV ■ ■ : • I- I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOMLEOGE AND BELIEF. DATE V < J J t J I64vrj (^UJULOi^S p/^ Uj C6 ..SluHe JtA./v^dL4wv-i O^o2o'' X- S'" ShuX ,A^^L-<^•. ....tf-j^ Uo<5-c)^i^. '-hui^uu-ls /9yvcrHvii^ S^K'^'^ 5/vii^ l^^^ .../tcc^ <^‘f~ <ryto_ Ai2^ .Qet-c-^i^ is bu-^Zi-. LOc kjla ^ q1 (<_A4&r" I'X /5^ u>^ ks^Ji- . . )Aj M’"toC olcJL CyZlX-tfUVC ^ 5 CAuJ3*^"V jj ^ I^CXU^^ i£rfu>0^ \MJU^cijt-:3 —— ‘fT-»—^<-fU_^ (Ol-^ \-<l5 K>C ^ JlL.Xsi~,^..^.c^ (PJ^ C>JU C4)JL^— ^ /vu><rU^ ' 3-7 fWl ''-4xx^ ‘^L. OK^i___4-j >-hr»t5 6-c? l5c3cx:^*-p ctiaJ*o h^HOQ /^vvj2 ^ plcv„<_*__ ^^trv cUU <5^ “XiTV^ . Ov-fl- u->- C5- rv^Lii-c^ *4is_t\>-' ^.. c/>sIo-t»fl.t^ iVcj^ io-t_ ^ pU <JL ^ ____ , cj<;^ ^-h~t- ^CU-e-^,^}Tf\,>l— — • L0<2_ A^LlcZ iOi’/v>UA-. <n- UM^ umJ j ^ M^t" \<IX^ p^ *-a^Cr\__A—■~VC5Z^. ----- __ ____^ UjZm bo ^ccQ,^ „j,Q^Jo Uy^— _ ./J —^ U>A^ 5^^. . ...........- ---------------------- ------------- (/JJL U^ Mpf- 0£kU^ __ly^ ^[JiXjt.A^H ........................ . II I Mt I 1^TillII il I ■ yi I II I ~ ~ 111? ' ir ~ *^ !*• IT III IV~ 11 rr> T> ~ii I iiT^iLii 1 m» 1 1 ~ i '^nirdkJ»4S:«ct*\*^<«^Y'i'--4hAin ^4TiA*...'r::cr m.*r ir vw* k&^»rJLj*iJti..A ..i vm J m HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHE^ SETBACK ZCNE: (CIRCLE CME) G-75' (^7E-25jx Existing Hardcover in Zone 250-300' 5C0-1CC0' A. House D. Sidewalk E.^ATIO/Deck F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other LENGTH X X X WIDTH Total H ardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone 7^r $«FI S I F I S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S • F • isn S.F. S.F.B -ifTI X100 = -% r. I „, rrz^ .. ^4. r 1 T-r^4a- Tit ■gk'h^ ----------.. - - _ --------- .. . A lAt -----.1 At 11« ^.T rhlMOffli rr«<^ *1 < 4 T1 u•l]>mA.«^^^/.•>-r•*KV^AA.f A^FWiti ZJ2Lnaj._^.A r i. ■ * #, V u‘' ■ , *.• •; ' • J ’ ^ • . I I fi •*. • ■ > • #% • i *> • r • 1 / * •. :• « i! •• I ■ ■ '• f k"; » * t* * t, ■ .'••■ ■'k p « 1 iL t r , . . • • « • ^ t ' ‘ 4 ' t 4) \n ffi f/ee'ex/sr/AiG /f/tftDcovae. W«.sn, G0.OO' (T inT^€ita> • ft •: * , \ 1-" : # ^ f . • I • • • \» • •;. % i. .• • r * 4 • • ‘ •• • _ • • •#• .* . «>.V i'. • .••. i • • • i • • ;v-‘; * • I ft I t i • L i ■ ----HI iir .....................Ill iiWri'Miiiiiw i a lll^lftlla«ll■l ■inWfciiiniiiiiiiiiiifcMMiNiiMaiHiiiaiiiii I .------—r. - iTr^rn } r - 9 CITY OF ORQINia CITY of ORONO Post Office Box G6» Crystal Bay. .Minnesota 55323• Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka January 17, 1990 Norman Carlson 3262 North Shore Drive Waytata, MN 55391 Dear Mr. Carlson.* Currently there is a sanitary sewer line on your property that is owned and maintained by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. As a result of the recent sewer construction in the area by M.W.C.C., the City of Orono will be receiving tne ^ownership o^ that sewer line. That sewer line runs into a li^w s^au-on 3200 North Shore Drive. Because of the installation o.^ the new lift station by Maxwell Bay Marina, the City or Orjrno can eliminate the lift station at 3200 North Shore Drive, -n orce. to accomplish this, we will need to construct a new will flow in the opposite direction that it is now .lov^ing^ There are oermanent easements on your property aj.lowing sewer line'and lift station to be there. However in croer to place a new sewer line, we will need temporary easemen-s .rom you. A temporary easement allows us to place dirt, materials and equipment on your property during construction of the sewer line. Once the project is completed, we would restore the property to its original condition. Attached for your review and -s a plan of the project and a copy of the temporary easement neeoed to construct the project. We would hope to begin cons^-uc»j.on February or March. Please call me upon receipt of this information^so^i-ha .. we can schedule meetings with you. I can be reached at 4/3-/35/. Sincerely, JRG/tln Public Works Director BtILOING a ZONING - 473-7357 ASSESSING ADMINISTRATION 4 FINANCE - J73-T35S FAX - 473JI5I0 PCBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 r - - ir * • •» \ :c':ir. k /'■•:• 1 DATE TIME CITY OF ORONO INSPECTION NOTICE PERMIT NO. CALLED IN SCHEDULED PERMIT NO______________completed ADDRESS J2cL t •- • • • . ^ ^ * i* . • •. OWNER CONTR TELEPHONE NO. li: 5 -I *• i •* • .J- -» ! • • * » • I• • 0 1 §o DESCRIPTION. 01 FOOTING 02 FRAMING 03 INSULATION 04 WALL BO. 05 FINAL 07 DEMO-SITE 07 DEMO-RNAL 09 PLUMBING Rl 10 PLUMBING FINAL 11 MECHANICAL Rl 16 WELL TEST PUMP 11 MECHANICAL FINAL 18 EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING 24/25 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 19 LAKESHOREAVETLANDS 12 WATER HOOK-UP 13 METER SET/TURN ON 14 SEWER HOOK-UP 27 SEPTIC MAINT. 15 SEPTIC INSTALL 23 SEPTIC FINAL OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:__YES___NO 34 TREE removal 17 SITE INSPECTION 06 PROGRESS 21 COMPLAINT 22 FOLLOW-UP COMMENTS: ^9 q: 2 Ui q: \2 I r: /7/>r<3L^ ^/o<^ar^' l/}/d \al-^ fe^WLaLt-/j\V n(jLjtA,ei:S> s '<tb * 5:o 0 Ulcc Uj1 ^ i^gjj Inp. I'e^f i PROCEED CPf '4 ... .. .... a WORK SATISFACTORY^ PROCEED □ CORRECT WORK A PROCEED Q CORRECT WORK. CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING □ CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN___ INSPECTOR Wia RETURN ROJECT COMPLETE ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY ________TEMPORARY ________PERMANENT 1 STOP ORDER POSTED. CALL INSPECTOR INSPECTION REQUIRED. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. HOURS. C; PHOTO TAKEN C CITATION ISSUED Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. 473-'7357 OwnedContractor Inspector. snti^or errsite:__ r. p.UxU^ -•Irv -w*.. WWt* C«p»mi*p*«ort ^11*Canary Copy/SUa Nolica / h iAiiii Klinl ___111 li ■ ^1 ■!*■! i linn If 111 . V. -• • • • .t. • .- s * .’• %• * ;• V *. V A - • .A*; .V: «• • • . #• • • •• • • « % » * • ?•♦ • \ -K .. .. • jH,*::Vv,.>..-. • . * ? •. . : . r ■;.■ ** * . .♦ % I •• • • u<f « * •• / i L—L— lXj 5io(i , \ ...... 3* c Wr IX*' 0'^" . k .; . <* . . •• *vj» •• N\'.® <" «-.•,. •*»• . . ... . •• •*••■«< • • * * • -^••csWbRrn * •; A-»V.r . .' V-'- V 6'J‘” ^ (• I I>w' -/ V. J ■ -tf *» .»<«•> «>«ir i - «; ■ « ''■tt*' AlAC’ 4 ' I ■l.il.liiHi To:Planning Comir.issicn Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commissicn Members City Administrator Moorse Prom: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator September 12, 1991 #1684 David and Anne Graham, 2745 Shadywcod Road Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB Required = 1 acre or 43,560 s.f. Existing = .75 acres or 32,500 s.f. 98% of the area of this property is located within the 0 to 75' lakeshore protected area. Review has considered the entire property within the lakeshore protected area. Pertinent Ordinances A.Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 - Lakeshore setback variance required for construction of upper and lower deck along west side of residence. Allowed = 0 Existing = 30' Proposed = 17' B.Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover variance approval required within 0 to 75' setback area. Allowed = 0 s.f. Existing per Applicant's Review = 7,837 s.f. or 24.1% Existing per Staff's Survey = 8,079.95 s.f. or 24.8% [Review Exhibit G] Proposed per Applicant = 7,707 s.f. or 23.7% Proposed per Staff ® 7,930.2 s.f. or 24.4% Total Reduction Based on Applicant's Findings = 130 s.f. or .4% Per Staff's Findings = 149.75 s.f. or .46% Hardcover/Structure below 929.4 Elevation Boathouse = 24x30 totaling 720 s.f. Attached Deck 12x20 = 144 s.f. C.Section 10.03, Subdivision 14(C) - Lot coverage Total Area = 32,500 Allowed = 4,875 s.f. or 15% Existing *» 3,085.95 s.f. or 9.49% Information on lot coverage has been provided merely as a comparison as entire property is located within the lakeshore protected area. i _ _ _ _ _ _ Zoning File #1684 September 12, 1991 Page 2 List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit L Exhibit M Application Property Owners List Plat Map 1 through 2 Applicant's Hardcover Fact Sheets [Existing/Propcsed] Existing Survey Proposed Survey Staff Sketch of Existing Hardcover Existing Floor Plan 1 through 2 Elevations Boathouse Floor Plan and Elevations Proposed Floor Plan 1 through 2 Proposed Elevations 1 through 2 Photos Description of Request Please refer to information on application form. Applicant proposes a 700 s.f. addition above the single story portion of the existing residence. No expansion of building footprint is proposed. Applicant does propose removal of three season porch and second story deck addition to south side of residence and replacing with 8x16' upper and lower deck structure to the west side of the existing residence. Expansion of the second story and the deck addition requires setback and hardcover variances. Note three-season porch/deck addition will be replaced with a sun trellis. The grade level will be restored to natural vegetation. No hardcover results with improvement. Review Exhibits K and L - 1 through 2. The second floor addition involves the exp ision of a master bedroom and bath area. The exterior will be resided with cedar shingles and complete reroofing. Existing boathouse structure shall not be structually altered but shall be resided with the same cedar shingles as house. Bardship Statement 1. Strict enforcement of zoning would not allow existing house. 2. 98% of property is located within 0 to 75' setback zone. 3. The property is a narrow peninsula surrounded by Lake Minnetonka on three sides. V Zoning File #1684 September 12, 1991 Page 3 4. The improvement project results in .46% reduction in hardcover. Circular drive resulting in some 4,200 s.f. of hardcover serves as the only turnaround area for emergency vehicles entering the severally limited peninsula area.4 CITY OP ORONO ~ VARIANC3 APPLICATION "jU # >n ili'^nZ.L. w-rr -wi. Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional va Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 ^ ^ „ (no change from original application) :\fter-the-Fact Fees (Double application -ee; W /»■• '.‘j i/ X..i,»i/WV'fc.VVVVv»' r,i -rv, f . t VI ifutf f-'c: /"i.T A I w* • VV ' >;v.-7/f u i iV)vva » w' • VIVMUt. A ... - ----------- i\ELtIPT-THAm YOU. . v'Vv>/S'j r*nAf OnJ t A i d AnO f “l /cV'U'.' . PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 2745 Shddywood Road. Orono, Minnesota A«^irL'/aT‘d^«"iptTcn 'if inc“b-Jn required survey. APPLiCAirr Name David and Anne Granam Phone (home) 729-1712_ Phone (work) 612 370-0700 OHNER 4219 19th Avenue South City; Minneapo1.is------ Zip-^ (if different than applicant) Phone (home)_------------------------- Name Phone (work) Address;City:Zip: Date Property Acquired August 1991 (month/year) I (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT DSE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District LR IB Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) OESCRIPTIOH OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 75,000.0^ Describe request in Request approval to add partial upper level within^ existing footprint; demolish 138 s.F. porcn: add sun trellace and deck; reside exiS^^ng ------------------------------------ext“erTorlvaTTs intnTedarTni partial renovation of existing VARIANCES REQUIRED interiors; re-roof. Lot Area Lot Width Front Hardcover SideSetback Variances (_ _ _ Front - - Variance to add approximately 700 GSF on partial new upper level completely within footprint of existing structure. —- - -Other * 98% of existing site is within 0-75' area; entire existing structure is non-conforming. irti( ifiiiin ^ HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship cr oractical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; strict enforcement of zoning would not allow existing house _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OF UNDSDAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Cede Requirements; of existing site is in 0-75’ zone._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with * *ty owners list). Certificate of survey jned by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8i«"xll"), Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll"). As an addendum to this applicatioUf please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Pleast remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. CL O o 3 «J X in rh 3 in -s 0 fD 1 ton> Q) in O 3 TJ O O ZT -5o> inc 3 in APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge Applicant's Signature Date OMIIBRS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of ttkis^re^est. Owner's Signature i Date in 3* rt -soa.co r+ O 3 Ol -s Cl in CLn 0) c 3 fO X Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planing Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled ]^0view meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. in rt- 3 in no 3 Cl O 3 in rw' lb qq. RUN DATE Oa/26/91 BATCH 001 PROR ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONT^R NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR CMIER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST 56 21-117-23 02725 SHAOYI EVA S JACOB EVA S JACOB 2725 SHADYNOO EXCELSIOR MN 24 0004 RD RO S53S1 38 21-117-23 24 0059 02771 SHAOYHOOO RD R O « H J OGLE RICHARD 6 A HARLYS J OGLE 2922 OAKLAND AVE SO HPLS MN 55407 38 21-117-23 32 0004 02800 PHEASANT RD CAROL H BURGESS CAROL H BURGESS 2800 PHEASANT RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 36 21-117-23 24 0005 02735 SHADYHOOO RD PAUL C CARLSON ETAL PAUL C CARLSON 2735 SHAOYHOOO RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 24 0060 02765 SHAOYWOOD RD B L NILHELM SOI NILHELH BURNIS L 3 DORIS I NILHELM 2765 SHADYHOOD RO EXCELSIOR MN 55331 TOTAL BATCH 001 00007 X •1 V ^ REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 1 36 21-117-23 24 0029 00036 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED PAUL C CARLSON ETAL PAUL C CARLSON 2735 SHADYHOOD RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 f ‘ 36 21-117-23 31 0003 02745 SHADYHOOD RD FIRST BANK NATIONAL ASSOC FIRST BANKS - MPFE0707 120 6TH ST S MPLS MN 55460 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HErXNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPEf^T TAXATigN» TO THE BEST OF MY KN0HLED6E AND BELIEF. DATE T OF PROPER TAXATim» T( fm'm M F • • \ ■■■ ♦ • '•■s . J‘ i . if libiitlii l: a Stoa *l#iLlllMllAl£' .-1HARDCGVE?. CALCUUTICtM WCP.KCHE S^T3AC:< ZOMS: Cc:?.:l£ :m£) 7:-250' 2S0-:lG' roG-iOuO' rXI STING HaRCCOVSS IN ZonS A. House 3. Garage c. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/ Deck F,Landscape • a A 5 UNDERLAIN BY , . plastic SHEETING G. Other V Barbeque 0‘1 A length 3 Season .Porch 9.5 X X X X 26 X 54 X X - X X 28 WIDTH 14.5 Circular •Drive 24 4.5 _ X _ _LL "Total’HARDcavE.q in Zone Total PflOPi'iTY Area in Zone 1512 135 4200 1104 73 243 120 s, F t S.r, S.F. S.r S.F. 426_ s.r. S.F. S.F S.r. S.F S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F S.F S.F. S.F. 7837 32500 _ S.F. _ S.F, ly-/ 7837 32500_ X 100 =• * Since 98! of the site is within 0-75\ I simply included the entire area. aM ■. a. grtnMa e ' nr'.'-'ikikiaflAai ak.a. « lLakLT.^ail Mi.WV - rt- I‘«iV i. a M.iai p«/9 Ml fOO- i I ifitfin 1 Vnl ~i IIII lai iiif I ..r t L . HAHDGVEH CALClJLATiG.'l l/ORKSHEET ScT3Ac:< ZONE: (circle onh ) G-75' 7S-25C' 250-5GG' :'G-1GCC' A. HCU$c , f * ill 54 X 28 1512 S.r . • • LENGTH X WIDTH •S.P. •. X • • • S.F. • X ss St r • •• X m « S.P. B. Ga RAG c _22 __ X . 21 a 426 S.F. c. D riveway Ci rcul ar • __ X .Drive 420C S.F,9 Av i « (A V IM # f 9 « V ^ 46 «. X .24 1104 • • S.F. • 0. S idewalk 26 _ X _3"-•CO_ S.F. 54 _ X _ 4.5 243 _ S.r. _ X _#mmm __ S.r*. 16 _ X _8 123 •— S.F. • =. Landscape . - - X __S3 0 _ S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN 3Y 1 - X _ • _ S. r. ?LAS“IC SHEETING . X _ •• • .. S.F. * X __ • s • „ S.F. mm • , Other 4 . X __ • 4 a 16 , S.F. Barbeque Totau Harocover in Zone 7707 Total Property Area ;n Zone 32500 S.F. S.r.B (J-1 A 7707 ^JJ .32500 X ion « 23.7 _% *’ •^ • •• • > •I \ MEa» ./ • 1 /V?: -ti : N * w-t 1*^0 SH4rri’'^^ 6M6TtrJfe\ 6'Z-^\ «« » ' m9^ .’•* t .• - v' r •*.,^ , A‘<jk -a • -1 u t . g>v$Tl Mfcv |\\ - DATE; September 10, 1991 TO;City of Orono Planning Coiiimission City of Orono City Council FROM; RG and MJ Ogle 2771 Shadywood Road Orono, MN 55331 RE; Proposed Improvements to 2745 Shadywooc Road We have reviewed the proposed improvements for 2745 Shadywood Road prepared by David Graham and illustrated on the drawings dated August 23, 1991. We support the proposed improvements. iI •ty ■ f' OATE: September 10, 1991 TO;City of Orono Planning Commission City of Orono City Council FROM;Burnis and Doris Wilhelm 2765 Shadywood Road Orono. MN 55331 RE: Proposed Improvements to 2745 Shadywood Road We have reviewed the proposed improvements for 2745 Shadywood Road prepared by David Graham and illustrated on the drawings dated August 23, 1991. We I I A 4^ MM ..M ^4 M To:Chainnan Kelley and Planning Cornirdssicn Mer.ber Ron Moorse, City Administrator 07 From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:September 12, 1991 Subject: #1685 Edward F. Baker, 3059 Farview Lane Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IA, Single family lakeshore residential, 2 acre, unsewered Application: Request for hardcover and setback variances to reconstruct deck area and stairway List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey/Site Plan Existing Hardcover Conditions Proposed Hardcover Conditions 1979 Approved Site Plan 1979 House Plan Permit Record Pertinent Ordinances 1.Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 - No hardcover or structure allowed within 75' of the lakeshore. 2.Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - No hardcover or structure allowed within 26' of wetlands, nor within 75' of the shoreline. Pertinent Facts 1. Hardcover on this property is summarized as follows; 0-75 75-250' Existing 14% 23.1% Proposed 7% 23.2% Allowed 0% 25% 2.A portion of the existing pool walkway is 18' from the defined wetland boundary. Walkway extensions and a stairway are proposed of which some portions will be 16' from the wetland. The house and pool were constructed in 1979 to meet the 75' lakeshore setback. Since that time, a previous owner constructed wood decks and a brick patio within the 75' setback area. No permits were issued for these improvements, and they do not show up on the survey completed in 1989 during the review of an encroachment of the drainage easement by a portion of the house. i Zoning File #1685 September 12, 1991 Page 2 4.Current property owner proposes to remove about half of the currently existing hardcover in the 0-75' zone, and rebuild the existing deck system which appears to have some significant structural problems. 5.About half of the existing 0-75' hardcover consists of planting beds with a plastic liner. All of that plastic in the 0-75' zone is proposed to be removed. The other 0-75' changes amount to replacing a portion of the removed brick patio with wooden deck. i^plic2mt's Statement of Hardship Please read the notes on the submitted application form. Discussion It can certainly be argued that since this residence was constructed under the current zoning code, there should be no hardcover in the 0-75' zone, other than the stairway system near the shoreline to provide lake access. The poor condition of the existing deck structures indicate they have been in place for quite some time, certainly preceeding the current or immediate past owners. While the 0-75' hardcover is proposed to be reduced by half, the net effect of the application is that the "constructed" portion of 0-75' hardcover will increase from a 315 s.f. deck to a 647 s.f. deck. The "existing/proposed" 0-75' hardcover is as follows: Existing (sf)Proposed (sf) Stairs to Lake 160 160 Stairs to Driveway 202 238 Brick Patio 506 0 Wood Deck 315 647 Boulder Walls 110 110 Driveway Portion 109 109 Plastic-lined Beds 1347 0 2749 s.f.1264 s.f. f 19,300 =14.2%f 19,300 = 6.5% In the 75-250' zone.additional decks and railing around perimeter of the pool seem to be a prudent improvement for safety's sake. The stairway proposed adjacent to the existing pool and corner deck provides access to the lower level, but encroaches into the 26' setback from the wetland as defined by the 930' contour. There also will be an encroachment across the platted drainage easement boundary, which is not concurrent with the actual edge of the wetland. Technically City approval is required for encroachment into the easement. Zoning File #1685 September 12, 1991 Page 3 Issues to Consider 1.Is there a sufficient hardship to justify the proposed hardcover revisions in the 0-75' zone? 2.Is there reasonable justification for approval of the wetland setback/drainage easement encroachment to construct pool perimeter walkways and a stairway? Options for Action 1. 2. 3. Approval as requested. Partial approval, specify conditions or limitations. Table, give applicant specific direction to submit a revised proposal. 4. Denial. CITY OP ORONO “ VARIANC3 APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ^ ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee SiOC.CC 4 •» 4 4T7 • > ti I V UM r ' y • • ♦ ' ^•#. • -f (no change from original appxicaricn, ;^fter-the-Fact Fees (Double application ree) •••««•«* mm •• •• mm ■ • * ! • t y Mc f lui 1 i. 1 t f Wf UMU'/TU PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address C-VJ/w;"C -•zzirc I titmtbw k-i > 1^50200000 01 OEH 225.00 CHECK TL 225.00 HECEIPr-THm YOU ^222010 COOl ROl T16:C nO "?7/C VU‘/ tmiJ/ / Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ' If 1 Attach legal description to application if not includea on required survey Phone (home) ^7^ ^ '•«. ;e (work) 3,^^^ ^ APPLICANT Name — i /9lJ.d ^ z±ip'.^SS3_/_Address OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:ni 9 T • L. V- •ZXD: Date Property Acquired '^u/y^ ^ ^- - - - I (^) (do r.ot) also own the adjacent parcels of land. (month/year) PRESENT OSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District /.^e-zA Present Use of Property Residential (7 other (specify) description of request I Describe request in detail; a 6 but I<L Estimated Construction Cost $/^.COO-__ ro ti y€c. a^c/^ e VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width L‘>!, Setback Variances ( Front Other _ _ _ Hardcover Side _ _ _ Rear) mm HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship cr practical difficulty rpultinq frcm strict enforcenentn of zoninc r^ulaticns; o~f~ Ana ]Poo/ d a tc K ___________________________________________________________ description' op unusual property conditions Describe unusual prooertv conditions preventing cop.pliance with Zoning Code Requirements: ^ $ I y -C ^ a d •m^ 2. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8J«"xll"). Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8-S"xJl"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. The App leant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember chat your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT * S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (stafx. time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the inrormation supplied is true and c^jf^ct to th^ b^t of his/her knowledge. 9/7 e M/Applicant's Signatur Date / / ONHERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verificati^n^of this-reouest. Owner's Signature thi^ rejmest. Date /^ /_ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled ]Q0e^in^s of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 1 I - rr I an] iT’ t-i—*1^—nairv -.- < - .-1 ——\ »*r*4 I •. RUN DATi 08/22/91 BATCH 006 T. •HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AI^DR 38 04-117-21 S3 0006 03075 FARVIEN LA P A A L J TAYLOR PAUL A A LUCIEFNE J TAYLOR 3075 FARVIEN LANE LONG LAKE MN 55356 PROP AODR 0»tCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 04-117-23 33 0009 03051 FARVIEN LA 6 D NILLIAMS A F B C NILLIAMS RONALD J BURGER 3051 FARVIEN LANE LONG LAKE MN 55356 t PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH NAME/ADDR if * f «^ ■ I' I I ' I * r <: V )' ♦ . r r-- I 1 1i • : ;:f- k •n » 006 00006 •> ' I. • >* SO (W-117-2S S3 0007 0S067 FARVIEN LA PHILLIP A OABILL PHILLIP A OABILL 3067 FARVIEN LONG LAKE MN SS356 30 06-117-23 36 0013 03070 FARVIEN LA DAB SILUS DAVID < BARBARA SILUS 3070 FARVIEN LA LONG LAKE HtJ 55356 REPORT NO. P1635401 PAGE 25 3B 06-117-23 33 0006 03059 FARVIEN LA E F BAKER A K J HYDE BAKER E F BAKER A K J HYDE BAKER 3059 FARVIEN LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 36 06-117-23 36 0016 03060 FARVIEN LA MARY JAYNE EVANS MARY JAYNE EVANS 3060 FARVIEN LA LOTK; lake MN 55356 OTYc^ ORONO aug 2 e i9di I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS ‘i '•y '/.• / . / •( / . (VA A T ^0 N S IUC( Tv GSaSbniiiw «mvhss£S^z:issigL -<%# »t s. • ..- V- • r ■■ nm::yai f'.' ■ •?•*.» *A'"' '^' yFr V‘- r..V* ■ \ k...•.V4\ ; •» • - , !&■. hm 'lu .,.f.._. ^ •^‘iiitiSlf^frLii ‘ fuO 10 OfT 10 COOTgJ" SL?SIi^iiiieingAWEAntgjl ^^nMnitosiisnunw o iM/rc m » - AUOWEOWfTHMK fmCRBUOOCOII Ultti VKHAnOil OFTKSfla. KEEP OFPD (mAMnaD con- _ m vowm; or nU SMAU K OOAMCLOAMA ^lAWOA MSlAi* NEOUH ICTUlINO iNfieloareai . i‘ i i^nk-'A .-AaJ.kdnKriAUtMllr'^AT.^ ----------------------------------- i-M>rrTitoAtfjr A^^-*AA^cSueil l. ii-i.Oi', • t*. t life'?'■:; .* , fa -k\ . / • . • ’ ' I '^'> i \ •'•' r •• ••. .. .; . >.-J- ’,• ■• •• ■. ■•.» •;» r • . ______—1-^ • • • • . «• « • • •I vVV •!'?••. ■ 1 *’ i F-^SjG J.:-, r V' W/j>^ •tf ili^w ►.'i vv t' • , * •• •*4f#rr Sf.j::y/A »Vo.7;m SJ';r.V;5 •r;.;'or.'^wSf • K.^ - ' •• '* *. .1* *; • ♦. #4^** . vvifT V;i 1. ^ ■c-f' ■*■'>•■ I'' ■ '-'SJ f* .••.-. ■ : . . ••> if .♦*;• t '*» •* • . •• • •• •«» .• ’. * .**v ^•••**.‘*; \ - •. •-,» 1 . • V r P«rnit No. permit record Date / -“71 Tvoe of Perrait /l4di7 - JU/a. ni.T9 u-hLXJi--------- 7o^»-7 9 Q^/d^nq /l^uLqii j'f iO«il CiHjLnJh ^/A&/o-)-nq *^T7V /o-n-ni • • • • • •- : ..; .• •: ^ • .’»* ■-« . • •• • e m . • < ' • • '. -' •. . •*' • ■ ‘ *. ^ *1^ M^W** >> - - •#. . « . • .1 To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members Mayor Peterson and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator Date:September 12, 1991 Subject:#1686 John Burger, 3750 Bayside Road - Sketch Plan Review - No formal action required of Planning Commission Zoning Districts: LR-IA and RR-IA Pertinent Ordinances - 1. 2. 3. 4. Section 10.23, Subdivision required for all lots. Lot A & B 6 (B) - Lot width variance Lot C-1 Required = 200' Proposed * 183' Variance = 17' or 8.5% Required = Proposed = Variance - 300' 210' 90' Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - No land alterations allowed within a designated wetland. If access to the northern parcel is via the designated wetland, a variance is required. Section 10.55, Subdivision 15 (A)(3) - All residential properties served by municipal sanitary sewer. A limited density credit may be allowed for the inclusion of flood fringe lands "equal to but not exceeding the amount of adjacent dry land which otherwise qualified for development under this chapter". (i.e. if applicant had a dry builda’ole contiguous parcel of 1 acre, applicant would only receive credit of 1 acre of the adjacent wetland as density credit.) Lot A Dry contiguous Wet = .38 1.65 Lot B Dry contiguous = 1.65 Wet » .83 Proposed Lots A and B are located within the LR-IA zoning district requiring 2 acres in area. Refer to Exhibit C for zoning boundaries of RR-IA and LR-IA districts. Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (B) ~ Combination of separated parcels prohibited. No lot or parcel of land which is divided by a public, private or platted road or road easement which results in any segment thereof being less than the minimum acreage required for that zoning district. 1 Zoning File #1686 September 12, 1991 Page 2 5. 6. shall be allowed to be combined with any separated parcel of land across the road for purposes of qualifying under the minimum acreage, open space, required yard, setback or sanitary or septic system requirements, nor shall building or density credits be credited or transferred between such parcels under any provisions of this chapter. Each separate parcel must individually conform to the provisions of this chapter in connection with construction of improvements thereon. If Lots C-1 and C are to be considered a single buildable site under the RR-IA 5 acre zone, a variance to this section would be required. A special lot combination agreement would be required of applicant if approved. Section 11.03 - Definition 24, lot area, minimum . . In rural zones not served by sanitary sewer, each lot must contain a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land exclusive of wetlands, public and private rights-of- way, vehicular or pedestrian easements.... All rural lots must comply with the City's on-site s€;ptic system provisions of the City Code. In urban areas served by sanitary sewer each lot must contain contiguous dry buildable land equal to the minimum areas as prescribed in the zoning chapter of the City Code.... Exclusive of public and private rights-of- way, vehicular or pedestrian easements, surface areas below the Ordinary High Water Mark of surface water wetlands or areas out of flood plain elevation for a specilic property and have legal access to the building site without encroachment of a wetland or flood plain area. Please note this last statement is not included within the rural area portion of the definition. It suggests that only in sewered areas was the proposed building site to achieve access without intersecting a wetland or flood plain area. Members may wish to more fully review this section. If an access easement is created via Lots A and B, this easement area must be excluded from minimum lot area of each lot. All access easements must be excluded from minimum lot acreage. Section 11.10, Subdivision 6 - Purpose and requirements of sketch plan review. The sketch plan is an initial presentation of a subdivider's intention and serves as a basis for conceptual discussion between the City and the subdivider providing beneficial savings for the subdivider prior to the filing of formal subdivision application. ikiellitt - ».-.,/»^r . W-— L Zoning File #1686 September 12, 1991 Page 3 List of Exhibits - A ~ Application A-1 - Location Map B - Survey of Sketch Plan - Area & Zoning Boundary Map - Burger's Bayside Plat - Staff Sketch of Existing Improvements in Relation to New Lot Line C D E Review of Sketch Plan Please review Exhibit B and C, the 3 lot subdivision p^'oposed by John Burger. The property is located within two zoning districts. The northern portion within the RR-IA, 5 acre rural zone, and the southern portion shown as Lots A and B are within the LR-IA, 2 acre lakeshore residential zone. Review Exhibit D. Burger's Bayside plat was approved in 1977 based on the original 5 acre rural zoning. The property was rezoned in 1988 to LR-IA. Mr. Burger is currently seeking sewer to the portion of the property located within the LR zone. The current proposal is based on the assumption that sewer will be provided to this property. The portions of the property located in the LR district have been included with the proposed sewer district for the Stubbs Bay area. A feasibility study has been ordered by the City and will be reviewed by the City Council at their October 14th meeting. Applicant has asked to be allowed to file a formal subdivision application with preliminary approval being granted subject to the property being served with sewer. The final plat application woult' not be filed until a sewer improvement project has been ordered. If Planning Commission will agree to consider a preliminary subdivision application that includes density credits for wetlands based on sewer being approved at a later date, applicant may be advised to file a preliminary subdivision application. Per Section 10.55, Subdivision 15 (3), applicant would apply for wetlands credit to meet the 2 acre minimum requirement of the LR- IA zoning district. Regardless of whether the property is served with sewer, the 2 lots will require a lot width variance to the 200 width requirement measured at the rear of the front street setback line at 50'. Please refer to the lot width variances required under Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) noted above. If Lot C-1 is to be the buildable portion of the rural lot, a lot width variance would be required as setback areas will be based on the adjacent Bayside Landing plat, the north lot line being the rear and the southern lot line being the front. The lot measures approximately 210' requiring a 90' width variance. 1 .MdfiWtti Zoning File #1686 September 12, 1991 Page 4 Review Exhibits A-1 and C, Mr. Burger's property consists of 2 separate parcels, a property to the north side of the Luce Line consisting of 4.22 acres that is currently landlocked. For the past 10 years Mr. Burger has attempted to achieve access to this site via easements from private adjacent property owners or from the City of Orono along southern boundary of Bederwood Park running along the north lot line of the Luce Line Trail. Mr. Burger has been unable to file a lot area variance because he has not been able to acquire legal access. In the current proposal he proposes the combining of the 4.22 rural property with a 2 + acre parcel on the south side of the Luce Line, the Parcel referred to as C~1 meets the minimum 2 acre contiguous requirement for a rural property at 2.16 acres dry. Parcel C-1 may be developed as the rural building site with principal and alternate septic sites. The 4.22 acre parcel to the north side must be legally combined to satisfy the 5 acre density requirement. Mr. Burger has agreed to file a special lot combination recognizing the property as one building site (C + C- 1). The total 6.84 acre site would be sold as one unit. The major concern for proposed lot C + C-1 is access to the building envelope on the south side. The C-1 site is restricted by the location of the designated wetland. Review Exhibit^ C, note with the Bayside Landing plat that the rural 5 acre site achieved access via a private drive that intersected the designated wetland. The subdivision involved the granting of a variance for land alterations involving filling and grading work within the designated wetland. In preliminary discussions with the applicant, staff has strongly urged Mr. Burger to work with the neighbor to the immediate west to achieve access via an existing private drive. The applicant has been advised of the limitations of an application that involves encroachment of a designated wetland when other alternatives for access exist. It should be noted that based on Section 11.03, Definition 24 that vehicular easement areas must be excluded from the lot area of each lot. If the applicant proceeds with the filing of a formal subdivision application that involves encroachment of the wetland. Burger must provide written documentation that all adjacent property owners have refused the granting of an access easement. Staff has also asked the City Attorney to comment on the City's obligation to provide access to a landlocked property. During preliminary discussions with the City Attorney, it appears the City has no obligation to provide access to a landlocked property but that it is really up to the developer or owner to acquire legal access. The City Attorney's office will provide a written opinion on this matter at a later date. ji Zoning File #1686 September 12, 1991 Page 5 Issues to be Resolved for Applicant 1.If applicant is not allowed to file a final plat application until sewer is ordered for the property, would the Planning Commission consider a preliminary subdivision seeking density credits for sewered property? 2.Irregardless of the issue of sewer, would you grant width variances for proposed Lots A, B and C-1? 3.If special lot combination is recommended, would you prefer the building envelope to be Lot C (north side of the Luce Line) or C-1 (south side)? 4.If applicant provides written documentation that all adjacent property owners deny access to the northern property, would you approve access via the designated wetland to a building site within C-1? Isv 't- : i m ■m i w-/r CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION 7 !7 Hm */ Sits Address ^.570 /,'*>Xii/.S/.5r / property Identification Muraber (P.I.D.) - /11: 2-^ -I! ^ Please check one ~ Property ■/ abstract or _ _ torrsns? Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT Phone (home) Name okrs LvOi Hvi lli*i Phone (work) ‘/S=SSS3_ Andress =.?.7gO irvto (if different than applicant) N2une Oc-T-f hi(Xri-'>f\e/LLL^_______ Phone (home) Phone (wcr.k) MT 'Bu-rnj.f t?ccL Address: «3l5 Ad-kr 5-) • l=City:UJ£-ii?^ (attach list if more than one) Zip: Q’S 1 EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size ■Z-- 1/0^? Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check)Residential; no. of units Other (specify)_ _ _ _ __ _ Present Zoning District Ld PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Units per Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential ~ Other (specify) ;s. ■ CMj_■ —r-Whr-l irw. MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Comcleted Application Fora 2. Preliminary*Plat information on Certificate of Survey. [ 3. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain ^ this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Canter 348-3271). 4. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FEES Slcetch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I s II Subdivision) 5150.00 250.00 250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) 300.00 + 20.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please maJce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 6 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. •„\ V V mm irf*. • j*V < ^ ■ 'T\:\^- im ' ..... r >1-.-. r.' CU-.-V for »>h:; r-r/rr In tJit :*r^^.v■eat i/- we^•^.'5r. :-i-"-r3 Certifiers t« o‘* Cun-e:': ^ •••»^*rer^ir'y t*.et ^ 4 « r-. ^ t' •««/•• w •-i;r/e: of t; #• • r* » ^W. • • •«« * '' *» t • • «^«*4k> ^ ^ f •, Hcrj-icpir. Ccunt", llinnesoU., *.r.e icca- istinr u--il:liri;:£ t;;erec-r., iw.u ■£;•.«: jrc- -t 4 . ,V..-* 1 —» .•:>.^V p*^j*DQz*^ wO Mi*c’» Cv*«^r* dfc.»«»pi'ov j» iw• 4 Ci «nc:*oiiC**i:::cr.*:., if -ry. rr«»*«#« mmm I W^’ - ^.25tAcre3 d'f ^ bui/do^btc /anc >. >b\^Udo^b »• j PT»-S '* ♦ ►: ht’tthmj Unni^ . .«N I £1-^* * — ^# w» S»^AAiH «/ .• 2 i^«* /^0'‘****’ ^ 5^r **»- :r ^tS\ /% Co4^/my .Amt Aas 64 Wmm.mma.m m^mm i,-. l■;■(Sw-■ ..-\\t:’■sar • ■ V-/ . V •■. W » t . ; ■ » ^T^•: ‘ ■fVis? • / »' -i i Liinu cr f.n:. fl\nr.er Jonr MriricGD^c Scui*-: J o I^ta. « i« i •*•:• .; -^v irrr s^.r-r^rX' ORDINANCE NO. 96.2nd Serifis taxe Minnetonka and associated bays AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN interim MORATORIUM ON THE granting of land SUBDIVISIONS THAT HAVE NOT RECEIVED PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FROM THE CITY and THE CITY OF ORONO ORDAINS: The Municipal Code of the City of Orono it amended by adding Ordinance No. 92:2nd SECTION 1. Statement of Policy. The City Council finds that the city it presently faced with the potential of applications for subdivision of land within 1.000 feet of lakes and 300 feet or the flood plain of certain tributariM within th# City Ikniu. The City is in the process of studying and preparing oomprehensivit amendment ol its shoreline reoimons. City Council finds that there is an ovenehelminQ probability that shoreline regulations will need to be upd^ed and revised. The City Council also finds that such •mendments cannot be accomplished until furth^ study has bean competed and a ^'**^ince enactment of such amendments will undoubtedly modify existing regulations concerning subdivision of lartd, tfvi processirig of appHcaoons during this interim period would be detrimental to the effectuation of propo^ standard amendments and contr^ to the purpose of the xoning enabling a«. Mint*®*®® Statutes asgasi - ei seo. The City Council further finds that It would be unwise, improper, and uniust to a«ow individual developmerit to occur ouring thia study period and would allow discrimination and \)ntmr advantage to a few to the detriment of the entire City. Therefore, the City Council finds it necessary and appropriate to adopt an Interim Ordinanr* pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 462.3S5, Subd.4.SECTION 2. nf»tr|etitfns ^ the All properties within th« City of Orono located within 300 feet or the flood plain of the fcilowing tributaries: Painters Creek (Sections 30. 31 T118N R23W) 'Stubbs Bay Creek* (Sections 32. 33 T118N R23W and Sections 4. 5 Tll7N R23Vy) •Dickey Lake Creek' (Sections 27. 34 Tl18iN R23W) ■Wolsfeld/Holy Name Creek* (Sections 26.27.35T118N R23W) Long LakeCre^(Sections34 3ST118N R23Wand Sections 3.10 Til7N R23W) •Forest Lake Creek* (Sections 6. 7 T17N R23V^ wECTION 4. Duradon This ordinance shall be effective for a period of one year, unless the City Council determines that it is no longer required because the requisite st^es have been completed and adopted and that appropriate evaluation and action, including any necessary revisions of the Zoning Code, have been finalized. The duration of this Ordinance may be extended by adoption of a subsequent ordinance, for a total additional period of eighteen months. SECTION S Variances. The City Council may grant a variwice to this Ordinance if the City ooutica finds after careful review of all me facts that a proposal is not contrary to me intent of the Comprehensive Plan, mat it is compatible wim the zoning and official control amendmentt being consideriwJ by me &ty. that it promotes me heaim, safety, and welfare of me citizens, and that a failure to grant a variance would create a hardship for the applicant SECTION 6. Sfpambilitv. Every section, provision, or of mis Ordinance is dedared separable from every other section, provision, or part. and. If any section, provision, or part thereof or action taken* hereunder shall be held invalid. It shall not affect any other 7°^ ^£etive Date Ordinance Is effective upon adoption by me City Council. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on me 26m day of August, 1991, by a vote of 4 ayes and 0 n^s. at gi.hHlwl«i«MrtBolleellonB . NO land suMivi«on appiicaiions. except tor those mat already have received preliminanr approval and for a subdivision application oi a property governed by a seltfement.agre«nent beti^ me Oties of Long Lake and Orono. shall ^ granted for any purpose mat would be inconsistent wim the appl^tions as ^ me date of adoption of ^ &dinance and to any subseg^|a^licyo rg^^^^^^ Area. The portion of me City of Orono that shall subject to ihe restrictions of this Ordinance is all the land contained wimin the area described as follows: - ^ . ) Air properties wimin t^ ^ of Or^O gOUNTY OF HENNEPIN) located wimin 1,000 feet of me Ordinary High ^ - • ■ V^talar Mwk of the following lakes* LaheKatrina This ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City ClerkBarbara A. Peterson. Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) w. Lake Classen Dickeys Lake WolsIeldLake Long Lake . . • • ■ J . ^ r^4 a •f.; X Lydiard Lake kioonei The foregoing Instrument was acknowl^ed before me on mis day August, 1 '^1991, by Barbara A. Peterson and Doromy M. Halim, Mayor a City Clerk of the aty of Orono. la Minnesota municipal oorporatiwi ar^ said rnstrument was executed on behalf of the City __ lyLake HadleyLake ~ Tanagiw Lake Frenot Lake . Forest Lake ' '1 1 r w Notary Public (Published m The Laker and Pioneer Sept. 2. - ’ ‘1991) r Affidavit of Pl state of Minnesota. County Bill Holm, being duly sworn, c an authorized agent and emp of the newspaper known as Th nesota, and has full knowledge stated below: A.) 1 lie newspaper has compi ments constituting qualifier newspaper, as provided b 331A.02, 331A.07, and oth- amended. B.) The printed which is attached was cut fre newspaper, and was printed ar week for__ / It was first published Mon dthe -day of and was thereafter printei Monday, to and including the day of KiaSTl Hi NOTARY PUBLIC - HENNEPIN C My oommissfcin exF Subscribed and sworn to me day of By: MINUTES O? LAKE USE COMMITTEE MEETING OP JULY 29, 1991 A meeting of the Lake Use Committee of the City of Orono was held pursuant to notice at 7:00 p.m., Monday, July 29, 1991, at the Orono Council Chambers. All Members of the Committee were present. Also present were Michael Gaffron, John Shardlow and Jeanne Mabusth. The minutes of the June 4th and June 18th meetings were presented for approval. Members were asked to review so that they could formally be approved at the next regular meeting of the Committee. The Committee unanimously appointed J. Diann Goetten as Vice-Chairperson and Jeanne Mabusth as Secretary. Chairman Callahan commented on the amended long-range development plan of the LMCD noting that the amended plan was more comprehensive and workable and that the Committee was now working on a recreational part of the plan. The Committee continued to review Chapter 4 of the DNR Shoreland Regulations model ordinances dealing with the classification of lakes. The ordinary high water mark of Lakes Classen, Lydiard, French and Katrina have not been determined. It will be necessary to determine the OHM of these lakes as part of the study for this ordinance amendment. Staff was to contact the DNR to determine if the DNR was to make these determinations or was it to be the responsibility of individual cities. In considering the special protection districts defined as the area located within 1,000 feet of the OHM of lakes and 300 feet on either side of specific tributaries, members questioned the impact of highways and railroads on these protected zones. Chairman Callahan specifically questioned the impact of the Burlington Railroad and Highway 12 on the 1,000' setback zone from the south shoreline of Long Lake. It was agreed that specific criteria must be developed to distinguish between this type of barrier and other areas within protected zones intersected by railroads and major thoroughfares. The Committee agreed with the classification of lakes as designated by the Department of Natural Resources. The DNR listed three protected tributaries within the City. Staff has recommended that three other tributaries be added to the protected listing. The Committee advised staff to proceed with a formal recommendation to the Committee. It was also noted that the 300' shoreline zone is intended to be expanded to the actual floodplain width where the floodplain extends more than 300' from the channel. In consideration of the impact of the shoreland regulations upon potential development, the Committee recommended that an interim ordinance be prepared for formal action by the Council and to place the appropriate legal notice in the official paper of the City. i HUifa LAKE USE COMMITTEE MEETING OF JULY 29, 1991 t The next meeting of the Committee was set for August 13, 1991 at the Orono Council Chambers, the meeting is to begin at 6:30 p.m. The Acting Administrator, John Gerhardson was requested to see that proper notice was given. There being no further business, the nieeting was adjourned. r m I > I: MINUTES OF LAKE USE COMMITTEE MEETING JUNE 18, 1991 A meeting of the Lake Use Committee of the City of Orono was held pursuant to notice at 8:00 a.m., Tuesday, June 18, 1991, at the Lafayette Club at Lake Minnetonka. Ali members of the Committee were present, except Diane Goetter. Also present were Mark Bernhardson, Jeanne Mabusth, and Mike Gaffron from the City staff, and John Shardlow. The minutes of the first meeting of the Lake Use Committee were approved as submitted. The document setting forth the purposes and function of the Lake Use Committee was approved in the form attac.hed hereto. Mike Gaffron then supplied the members of the Committee \fj_th a copy of the proposed DNR Shoreland Regulations containing preliminary comments and notations resulting from the attempts of the staff to determine the differences bu-ween the Orono regulations and the DNR regulations and also the similarities between them. Mr. Gaffron gave a preliminary overview of the DNR regulations and suggested one or two of the major problem area.s which the Committee will need to focus on. The Committee determined that it would be necessary to consider the draft of the DNR regulations in detail and article by article. It further determined that it was desirable for the Committee and the City to reach conclusions as to the form of regulations which the City would prefer to adopt, if possible, before discussing with the DNR what changes, it any, that the organization would be willing to accept. In this connection, it was decided that commencing with Section 4 of the DNR regulations relating to classification of lakes and streams would be most productive, and that the next meeting of the Committee should be devoted primarily to that end. The next meeting of the Committee was tentatively set for 7:30 in the evening, Thursday, June 27th, at the City Council chambers. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned 2648X liMiiiuili PURPOSES The purpose and function of the Lake Use Committee is to focus upon the activities of Orono as they relate to Lake Minnetonka, in particular, and other lakes and wetlands within its boundaries with particular emphasis upon these bodies of water and their environs as natural resources of the City. The Committee will advise the Council upon, or itself propose to the Council, actions aimed at: 1) conserving and improving where possible the environmental quality of The Lake; 2) preventing pollution of The Lake of all kinds, including non-surface pollution such as milfoil, the presence of excessive nutrients. etc.; 3) ensuring safe and reasonable use of The Lake; 4) preventing unreasonable and excessive impact upon the shorelard and further degradation of the quality of lake use and user experience In particular, at the present, the Committee expects to be revi'^wing: 1) the proposed LMCD Long Range Management Plan; 2) the DNP Shoreland Regulations as they relate to Orono's comprehensive plan and specific zoning regulations; 3) marina licensing; and 4) regulation of marinas within Orono. 2642X MINUTES OF LAKE USE COMI-IITTEE MEETING JUNE 4, 1991 A meeting of the Lake Use Committee was held pursuant to notice at the Lafayette Club, Lake Minnetonka, at 8;0'J a.m., Tuesday, June 4, 1991. All members of the Committee were present. Also present was Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator. The minutes of the first meeting of the Committee were approved. A draft proposal was circulated describing the purposes of the Committee. Some changes in language were suggested by JoEllen Herr. And, it was determined that the draft would be rewritten and submitted for approval at a later meeting. A discussion took place for the benefit of the new members from the Planning Commission of the background of the Committee and the general problems which were currently before it. After further discussion, and because the City was awaiting a new draft of the proposed LMCD long-range management plan (or portions thereof) so that particular matter was temporarily in abeyance, it was decided that the Committee would focus upon a study of the DNR Shoreland Regulations as they relato to Orono's comprehensive plan and specific zoning regulations. And, it was further decided to have the members of the staff, specifically Mike Gaffron and Jeanne Mabusth, bring the Committee up to date on their work in this area. The next meeting of the Committee was set for June 18 at the Lafayette Club, and the City Administrator was requested to see that proper notice was given. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. 2645X :|^ii CITT OF OROMO FLAmiaa cowassion MBBrnw MOMORT, SBFTBOin 16, 1991 - 7t00 F.M. 1275 mONM ROAD SOOTS - COOSCXI. CSAMBnS COOSCIL RSPRBSKsrATIVS - Gabriel Jabbour ATmOASCS - SCSDOUD PIBLIC SSAUSBa - 1. *1676 City of Orono, 700 Old Cryatal Bay Ad Morth* ConditlonalUao Pamlt - Continuation of Fubi ic Bearing del 6 Roberta Vaughan, 205 Tonka Avenue - Subdivielon Rearrar.geaent Daniel 6 Robert Vaughan, 205 Tonka Avenue - Variance - Public Bearing *1603 I Nate Claes III ACTION ITBNS - Review of these itaas will cossMnce prior to or between scheduled public hearings. Robert F. Suass, 2590 Natertown Road - PrellNlnsry Subdlvisloo - Applloants presenting varianea reqnaata before tho Consil salon are aakad to nova to the podina at the front ot the Cbaabors whan their application la aaaoancod by tho Chalraaa. •1600 Janes R. Bartiall, 29(7 Casco Poln Variance - Continuation of Public Bearing 11669 John Nalkar, 1310 Spruce Place - Variance - Continuation of Public Bearing •1677 Cedric Dettloff, 1255 Dickenson Street Variance - Public Bearing •167( Paul 6 Marcia Merlo, 2142 Shadywood Read - Varianea - Public Bearing •1679 Nllllaa F. Miller, 2691 Casco Point Read - Variance - Public Rearing •16(2 Christine Brlckley, 3262 North Shore Drive - Variance - Public Bearing •16(4 David 4 Anna Grahaa, 2745 Shadywood Road - Variance - Public Bearing *1685 Edward F. Baker, j Variance - Public Bearing3059 Parvlew Lane - 13. OlSt* John Burger, 3750 Bayslda - Sketch Plan Review Planning CoHBisaloo r lutn - l!«Ungof ?ip"^’r 9rTj,"^“" to Council 15. Status report by Lake Dae CoasUttee repreaantatlvaa. a. "•’‘"^J^^jterln^ Ordinance approved by Council on b. other 16. Status report by Facilities Cenaattae representatives. 17. Other Issues. Additional ItMs - 18. 19. nlnutes of the August 19, « representative to attendOctober 14, 19«1 <*c!inrll T-A’ OA NiELS , — hnr Of Wet/ atSeU ^St^ofbex..i LONG 5 O^'c '/zNE ■» .(i- BK MO’OZ 36"W LOT 3 liOTtac,. tiorih ! A N' •'' /•-, ?-<Li EIGHTS 230* ,.v- ■ % 1 t 1 iuOT2 1 2.0iocr€* 1 o A 1 • t'i.oan ZBOt -?i;iUifW) seHMck. Im>.1. 290t IJZI 3U outlot '^a ______________ 5tOt 50 ii':l if“■' Ifi 'V S'I 1 s; s:! jjiJi s^i? Si^S^ftafom^ yk.fi Efte. of 5£'4 of 5t >» of Sf^. S3-UB-Z3 ^P||PP“' "''r; ■ ■UMa g a ■i^ OUTTMO LEGAL MBCMPTIOI* Th* W»«t OiMrtwf o« •Mtton 33. TownsM* m North. Ron«o 23 Wo«l of tho | ALSO *tat sort of mM SowtbOMl OMortor of Uto SeulhoMt i •MMMOt OiMTlor of tho Soofhooot QuMtor. mO i OiMrtor of tho Soottiooot Qwortor TM« intonOo to Ulow MM MowiMarMo Of MM i •k IoMns IMom. sommo. aiM born thoroon. H Oooo not i or owcrooctMiMiito. pANiELS L. 0 LAKE K lAGK-TS • Jci P“ IBOt /»0* 9 J»i0T2 LOTI 1 So ■ho rofocno ;5 1 ft i I •»c \wAoM Int. -j 9 s zeot OUTLOT A LOT 3 1*4)7 tK :t4 r 4^ U 'i..* UWTIM LCOM. MMIWTION: Th* «••( OMrtor 1 •MMm U. IbMtM# m Worlll. Nw«« 23 WmI oI »w SID PrtnelMl ll«rl«l«a M.tO niat aari oi mm SouUmw* OmtIw «i <«• ! >♦ SK.MX) B> KKVNK>S [ i>Aii Ufe^RiklK>N 1 11I1 Ihnrh .,1*, IMI >un.-> forpunl K mr.. undrt im xip* '»» lo, 1 1. . M I'ml tjw>m Md iMd Sm«. uMr rtirUM* <if *»M<r *< Miwnriuu _ M«t ■- i. MitiB* Mio»««9i Urrar irv Corns iS {,Ro\i!iH(,. i\e PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR ROBERT F. SUESS IN THE SE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 33-118-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESO''^ I I TkM MTMV iMmMi to MOTt M* kMMMrlM M Hto Mow MurMoa r ri I *«tol* aMM*. »M **»» IBowoo K Wot oM »to*ocl to Mto» «„ «■ or oocroacfiaaau. '< Al k ' t-*' UAIt 8 ?5-9i (Lie NO 8i 2fc4 4 'wi-' .'.- r ^ Jr*** ■’ fc' t^--:m^: Wh eUP*»TU«* n -rw»M> (MIKU*^) fCAN DUNDEE NURSERY « LANDSCAPE CO. •“ V-l'-iT I •—j -f. I /Lrt^ t^Meracix. ?t.yH:eit.£.- a'len OKi*^ it»MT *<»w #'■ U\<i M. -'I p<26(=b5rti (comeUATIOfJ OP ftAuS 1 ^ AwD ra»ft>4e«k (2c *u >«am4 xnAiAAf^ /••■-!(.■ \ \ \ ft l(4« ■J®rl*>w(»%|»(»‘| Jf «f 4 lifii^ Itraw* ' I I’l* I ;••• -vjr '.inc l«i l!ie S>tnr>lia»<> 1>* •.4MI Inf 4H«I •I I..I. 4ll !• Moch I. • Niinf't Lake m»ii«»iMNk.i an.i i>l»o t!i4l |i4*i 9i lui i?, Platk I. «hi'.4 Svi^ 'oiilMajlerl f • 4 Ii%« p'4«N Ha'lfM<4ni nr I v 'rti* 4 |>«*INI am Iha I r !<•»«• m .»i * «• fie MAtt ;>oMlh«rl|r corNi-- u'. »4ii< l«l . I n «l|:.i4al 1? h ee? lunhwikln. I * •• •If Me4ta*o« 4iun4 4 Mae itraaa 'roa » imlal ii’i mM 'laalki-a-.lerly liar .i;tt4nl 2n.'j ieni ••nrtii«4 .m-I r •aiat aa lh« Nor i haasttr I v liaa a' »4ul lal dttlanl c/l.n -mti ao-• haaM er I y of mm wokierly rornar » l« I oiai iHarcor . Naaurpia CoiMily. 'Iln.icknta. iia til 4a aiiuiay koaie aa4 Oriveaav i» ral4iiua in ilia aliuvi: tatcribat iiroperty. i|trrt»«aenli or eacroarkaeats, oiaar thaa aaiUiaf vikihle Hartcoatr. >a aa astuMd tlaiua. II tt*«% aoi ( ) M(ianJa.r cor/t*r ' G.&00' )( Des-^RlP7-/hA) That part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township IXTNorth, Ran9« 33, West of the Stl Principal Meridian, Hennepin Qxinty, Minnesota, described us follcMSi Beginning at meander corner No. S7 on the Scut,, side of Maxv«ll Bay In the East line of said Section 8; thence South on the East line of said Section 8, 376.35 feet; thence due West at right angles 455.3 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing due West 68 feet; thence due North 140.7 feet nore or less to the Southerly shore of Maxell Bay; thence Northeasterly along the Southerly shore of Max>well Bay to a point in a line drawn due North fran the actual point of beginning; thence due South 183.7 feet more or less to the actual point of beginning. Eor the purpose of this description the East line of said Section 8 Is considered to be a due North and South line. Together with an easanent for drlv»ay purposes over that part of Government Lot 1, Section 8. Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at meander comer No. 57 on the South side of Maxwell Bay in the East line of said Section 8; thence South along the East line of said Section 8, 376.35 feet; thence due West at right angles 447.8 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence due South 82.05 feet; thence South 11 degrees, 47 minutes West 218.55 feet; thence South 12 degrees, 37 minutes East 71 feet more or less to a point in the Northerly right of way line of County Road No. 51; thence Southwesterly along said Northerly right of way line 15.1 feet; thence North 12 degrees, 37 minutes West 73.85 feet; thence North 11 degrees, 47 minutes East 218.85 feet; thence due North 82.05 feet more or less to a point in a line drawn due Wtot fran the actU2d point of beginning; thence due East 15 feet to the actual point of beginning. For the purpose of this description tlie East line of said Section 8 is considered to be a due North and South line. □ • WOOD STAKE PLACED B.M, - BEARINGS ON ASSUMED DATUM O ■ IRON MON. SET PRC POSED INFORMATION --------------1st FLOOR ELEV. . BASEMENT ELEV. ' DRAINAGE 000.0 • EXIST. ELEV. (oOO.oj* PROPOSED ELEV. • • IRON MON. INPLACE -GARAGE FLOOR ELEV. -TOP BLOCK ELEV. u SCHODORG \n“d surveying1;1 INC. iH. 1. a«> ns Ddans.wrl lt)is ^ EXIST. & PROP. ELEV. I hereby cerlily the! this plan, survey or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision end that I am • duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws ot tha Stata Ol Minnesota.Innesota. _ Date: jlSA . -Zd Registration No. 14700 JOB* Book - Page 20-3C7 Scale '=30' cy/?/s mMmA > ^ #k' -*4 M> I'*"'' / mm,^. A1««Wfcr corner ({.■>»• • J-. >' r /<* .'IJT ' A'3' *’!.-/*-f'’ fff-^“'^ tAl».t ^.‘l‘n -!(>'■: • + tO»'-'-<>' ^■^F>r^ M' of t/t/yvtii ' ' r 2V*^ * • ■ ‘/t.'-X /fJtt- Iffu' ' nfySf o i>^ • ,'r,'r»»'- A-.0 6" , %f-r-'i' Oesaitier'^A) lh*t ptet of Govwnmmt Lot I, Soctlon I, TOMn^p lllHotth, tango 23, W««t of tho Sth Prlnclpol Morldian, Honnopln County, mnnionti. doocrlM «io follcmi Boginni^ at nundar oonwr Ho. S7 on tho South side of Maxuall tay in tho East lino of said Soction li thanca South on tha East llna of said Saction I, 376.3S faati thanca duo Hast at riAt anglas 495.3 fast to tha actual point of bagiming of tho tract to fas jUoerifaadi thanos oontinuing duo Hast 61 fast) thanca duo North 140.7 fast non or lass to tha Southarly shora of ta»«ll Bayi thanca Northasstarly along tha Southarly shora of Msxuall Bay to a point in a lina drawi dua North fios tha actual point of faagindngi thanca dua faitii 1S3.7 foot seta or loss to tha actual point of bagianing. For tha pixposa of this dascription tha East lina of said Saction I Is oonsidarod to ba a dua North and South lino. Togathar with an lasawnt for drivauay puspoaas ovar that part of Govamnant Lot 1, Soction I, Vowiahip 117, Bango 33, Hannapin County, Hinnasota, daacrifaad as followai Baginning at saandar oomr No. 97 on tho South sldo of Maxwall Bay in tha East lina of said Saction •> thanca South along tho East lina of said Saction S, 376.35 fast) thanca duo Hast at right anglas 447.1 foot to tho actual point of baginning of tha tract bo ba dascrlbadi thanca dua South 12.05 faati thanca South 11 dagraas, 47 sunutas Hast 216.95 faati thanca South 12 dagraas, 37 sdnutas East 71 foot sora or lass to a point In tha Northarly right of t«y lina of County load No. 91i thanca Southmstarly along aald Northarly right of uay llna 19.1 faati thanca North 12 dagraas, 37 sdnutas Host 73.15 fasti thanos North 11 dagraas, 47 sdnutas East 211.15 fast} thanca dua North 12.05 fast sora or lass to a point in a lina draun dua Hast fxos tha actual point of bagimingi thanoa dua East 15 feat to ttw actual point of boginning. For tha lino of said Saction i la oonsldarad to purpoaa of this dascrlptlm tha East ba a dua North and South lina. B M° ’ o . IRON MON. SET a . IRON MON. INPLACE .s-^sSm ------------ BASEMENT ELEV. TOP BLOCK ELEV -.DHAINAO. O.M.B.lST.ftK. (ocoo). reOPOMD tLEV. EXIST. . PflOA. EtEV. u 1 scHOBona 1 htrtby cerllly lhat this plan, turvay or raporl was prepared by mo or under my direct tupervis'.on and lhal 1 am a duly Ragltlared Land Surveyor under Ihe lawi ol the Stale ol MInnesgla. - JOBS 3tNP SURVEYING Book - Page 20*30r INC. «>t nil OsIm».'mm UIH --------- negituallon No. 14700 Scaler*«5o' cy^/s ^ ■ V- jsk'' ■~^'"..S/-,#»^- //A : v//■:;■■■ ;i J / / // H k _-:‘ - ';" \Mi^:- 4 , S' 1 ^■f ■ >: !^ . "'V 't.:. .................... '~%fc^... ' 5»trm <s^gitig /#•1'- #• lp*i—r—•* EXISTING ELEVATIONS •«, # * I.# fO n Es3 Zz 01 QI Q0 1 g s (/) IT) r- c-/jy ""w •iS&Sx:. ~j~t: =SlS^ T I I 4 S M i[il \ / IX- plam Ve>=l-«^ P&PAIR ^bOST S|^iPtE_——»L JL I—[f -^€=r iwh!» Fe^vvirs^----- f?B<svpp fi c:cp^ _ SWStt&TD AATOi-rtoUQs. iAtt <SVO^V--- .. N»c^t+ pxiCTItJfe Eo^TTtoi^ '/fc^i'-— 00 i C/3 CaQzz 0 1 QIs i g s 1/3 I/) r~(N P^®P#';«-iPS / HiM mi pp ■'■^■'■'^ "':.r- fcvvP V ■: P m. M K,> : T">, -y-^ t«M #•»••• r<r-03 ^s |00<ti»M KfUL tiSSi:-----^ e vioWW W.ej^'noM r^crosms '.Mr»»vwBWTt i/V—I—— ■r ■1 •■Whig Tvr^MArMM «M«r UJRfeT ek»JfcT10M waocio Of^BuWNtg r—»" PROPOSED ELEVATIONS I C/3 z 0 1 QI § is <s c/3 m ■«»r' <<« r iii'j SI mm ■■’" '■"'••■■ ..■■ "■ '■■;,...;-y--' ■s 160948-006 420 34 SURVEY FOR: Cf/ASC MANHATTAH FIMMCIAL C€NTeB. INC. DESCRlPTlWi Prepared By: SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. Engineers « Surveyors* Planners • Soils Testing 10550 Wayzata Boulevard Minnetonka, Mn. 55343 Tel. 646-7601 Lot 6, Block 1, FARVIEW, according to the recorded plat thereof. GENERAL NOTES: • • Denotes Iron nranument found, o- Denotes Iron nunument set. PeviMci Mar. 2, nsn 1o alww wallanJs Rav'\s«c) Mar. S. to SheW £a««m*n14) te^s«c) e, to shew Casemen^ 9^ Revised Mor.S.rtWfo show ^SO contour. 6) Revised Mar. Vo show drive esmV. I lwr«by ctrllfy th«l thli lurvty mi •r»|wr«a und*r *y lupirvlstafi ind tii*l I M • Itcensed Land Surveyor under the lews of ihe State of Mtna^sota.awt of the State of Htn^so CSMEET I OF 2 SHFETS) Bite: I S ISO’S Item* So. irSM ( 1 Existing Conditions • (taksn from Shoell & Madson survey dated 8/8/91) U.U. li. (0(0 (0 327 SF 827 SF 160 SF 202 SF 506 SF 315 SF ?{S stVCM 2 4 Stairs from lawn to lake g Stairs from deck to driveway C Brick Patio / Wood deck within 75’ setback /"Wood deck beyond 75' setback ^ Pool ^ Boulder walls qb //Bituminous driveway 109 SF r Planting beds w/plastic within 75’setback - (g) lakeshore 245 SF7in' lanosiiurB or 7 west Of deck 218 SF t ( south of deck 373 SF f . f • Planting beds w/plastic outside 75’setback **T,755*^f 2,749 SF (14%) • IlM I r«*le»td thli I hereby certify that this survey was V- prepared under ay supervision and that I an a Licensed Land Surveyor under the i taws of the State of Minnesota. M ^F>HFPT 5> nrr> eirrr?T«s> WT" 6^, ■ ; ■.'jH X r-:;!.-. -a m i' ■ * '■ \ ■■ >* »'* » ■ ' .,■ r-- \ V A .::■■■ \ /Ii!3!SES3»]::il > ■> '■• n-i:' ' \7t '•S A \ @ \ \ i:.\ 0)\ f jn«.. , • • ■ 1.. ;■'' ;;i i ■■”■. ■ •■v'J * ' '■. V'. '' •■. ■I, . :.;,,, • ^ •“ U'! : •■• t "11“ -3 . • . • ■ I, ■ -ii.*.- :. trWL dl®©k ^V7sf- V V. '».o (D' —w; rai^ B***!!!* ««r» \ l«ii(i«Wif /«p LM« m) . ^gsf /a^sA' . . Proposed Dovolopmont - (taken from S&M survey & IvyCrest plan dated 8/22/91) A Stairs from lawn to lake 160 SF (unchanged) \ \ S Stairs from deck to driveway 238 SF \ V C Brick Patio 0 SF , \ \s ^tWood deck within 75* setback 647 SF £Wood deck beyond 75' setback 675 SF /ePool 563 SF . \ 1 C Boulder walls 110 SF (unchanged) . \ H Bituminous driveway 109 SF (unchanged), i Planting beds with plastic (reduced 1,755 SF outside 75") 0 SF Total: Proposed Development/Welland Setback - 1,264 SF (7%) TButlding/Pool/Deck within 26' weti^nd setback 232 SF (unchaiiged) Wool deck (30* wide) cantilevered above lawn below 100 SF - ro^t «b«c. Proposed Stairway within 26 ’ wetland setback /(Planting beds with plastic within 26' wetland setback \ 78 SF 0 SF Total:V.S ■jTo-TT i'-/' 3-^ k.- 7WW - «58.oa no’h zs‘ E I hcrt’hy c«( ti'v rnat t hl» of the boundaries: Lot I And of the location of all i •' any fron or I* a trie and correct repres,-n t .11 i on of a survey BlocL I. B'JACER BAVSIOE. Honnooin County. Hinncsota huildinos. if anv. thereon, and all visbie said land. It also s.how« the location of th day l«50 HO'nZSt of Auyust. 1977. « .'J * TK3mas S. Berqauift fA* Land Survevoi No. 7725 DENOTES DENOTES WOOD STAKES IRON MONUMENT ..oi iM* evaaMa*. a ^»i . -M,’ »«•»••••*»«,• «i II i,AB« r-H 'MrtC* ’f OMbSBB'l** McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES INC. r*foo 3739 PREPARED FOR JOHN BURGER