Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
04-15-1991 Planning Packet
'-ST! CITY OP ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, APRIL 15, 1991 7:00 P.M. 1275 BROWN ROAD SOOTH - CODNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - Gabriel Jabbour ATTENDANCE SCBEDULSD PUBLIC HEARINGS - 8:30 p.m. 1. Amendment to Zoning Code A. Temporary signs in commercial districts B. Municipal facilities of neighboring cities within Orono City Limits ACTION ITEMS Review of these items will commence prior to or between Scheduled Public Hearings. 2. #1631 » 3. #1632 4. #1633 !5. #1634 j'. '■. • ■6. #1635 ---_ _ _ _7. #1636 8. #1637 9. #1638 Variance - Public Hearing Renewal Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Variance - Public Hearing James & Joan Maus - 3700 Bayside Road - Variance - Public Hearing John O'Sullivan 6 Erwin Smith - 2420 Shadywood Road - Variance/Commercial Site Plan Review - Public Hearing After-the-Fact Variances - Public Hearing ^ # Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing Variances - Public Hearing SKETCH PLAN REVIEWS 10. #1618 William Purcel - Baldur Park - PRD - Subdivision ADDITIONAL ITEMS 11. Role of Planning Commission - Discussion \ 12. Planning Commission Commments - 1991 Strategic Plan 13. Planning Commission approval of minutes of March 18 and 20, 1991 meetings. 14. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend May 13, 1991 meeting of the Council. ii^. ADJOURNMENT . .•* OpcondLng Events Calendar Joint meeting of Planning Commission and Council on April 20, 1991 has been postponed. 4/X7/91 - 5:30 p.m. - Highway 12 Policy Corrjnittee, Maple Plain City Hall -W.T7‘ ' /; x.'.tj'ws: V:. S !■• - ,• • ■ 2-'.- ' m^- ■'« . V' . . . / .-r... ;^.*, ;Viv-J •» Ui »1 " ■ £)m{^on 15, Mi 'o/ne V ' ■« »• »■■-*» «•«AM^~-J^ c/n~# Ij (W^A/’ {/ ^(>{ L L ? u-V? f^J . •i ■»'' o S^H'^ o , j>HHX)'{U'e't 0 i^Xf r <ii<4 - a»^ fwiM < 'li 4-\P. ^ ( ' .. CcZL i(^'-,-i7 A ( ■,■. ^ ^ 0, ■ - - r-r t— -* .**' a»- . I5' ,:ii;^‘’-• . -‘;' / ' — • »f«<*y*«i »’Wn« ‘•j'f - J*y ‘ ' ■,‘4- -v —^> 4« my-'-.:' :w ■;« -••^. .. v» 4 *•.*••'.#•* ^jt ' " ^ ^ -!i- V .*■■ ^ . t». M. ■' ^ -• . 'V; ~^ r*r ■ ^i? , *’ V ^'' __ . 1^ #« «'.« •. • II • i • •■ .• .^ . . - . •,; -V'. ’■*.. ^. ‘-^.^ ■ s •.•'<•'fit <a-0» ^Alf-■»*•. j“. V »«Uu. V': 4:, ■■■: .r^" t. •■• ■■■ I■»» *f4f> ^'•■ H>>- •'SI J*.-' .-^ 0S. ■^jgfm' •"•<». Xs:. -Lv .. , • ". f«" <r' *■ -^••' ‘^7; >SK,. •' V.. >' » fZ > -• ■!»» ' *V*' - ; ■r'- •• ’ . • i * *■' » ’ ‘ '**^^* V* M ----------- 'i' «« *-...^« . .-V :'Jj(^. *j* •» . -. - ♦■,•— • -HN^ ViS .. ." '»«• u *-A- Si m^m iJ.-V; o tCH Bus/ru'c' SSc S .b < i aV^'/> r //I. Quf\^~e y pfr- (i-K ^ -r' UP TC ^ /i^'6-6'/<r \ ■1 rcP- .' T- / r rJ n (F(^.Lur s“ / (T/'iPc/2/^ A r (P ^Si.n L uUi-iA i{c/l Ut'A 'C Y '-I a- OJ()Pl C'l'CLC' -h riT-A fr':s \P C //fL C ^ I C I u /•< /fc ^ P (C K C> L cc c^u I ^ 1 b fc f< c /‘t A i' r a"*. ' I*' -.pli/tStt!^^* ^ CU C c l S /)u"CACriyi^ ^ t> * r' / Z Z/f-hPc= , ;-{ .» » rJ:'.. f ...^ ■ ff jTT'r^> A^/i ^/i*TrP|o^-£/ V -V. (T i-ZI //«/’»/f' ^ i-r U /«-' ^ t'V //>//'#flT r t /PIPATik'^ (t f i'Ti t i ■ Si:^' l:/J/?rpPfh' /Jpiccc LcAc i Vr:-, s /I fT 4 Vi'/r.v P^ V J c t"/^ /I .' »t‘ e^f>/?uw -i- hfc im f:'/. ri- f. r* t 1 5 tI v O a •'^'a '■* < ‘«'(-'•4 ( * r f”^ ^ !'• ■ nCT iv/c uiA’/\1 t (A-^/^A'fc A/» i'/?P^\'‘ L • s c fS S'‘~f:.'i/ C'. p • M" ‘V-, t- *'” " ■ :.»*■ ' a . . Jf^-r.kJ i: ■ :5 I ■SSffSSfO”V r- '! i 1 4 1 —T7 To; From: Date: Subject: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Xelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator December 13, 1990 3 (2) Temporary Signs in Commercial Districts I'h !v'- In 1988 the City amended it's temporary sign ordinance to Drive (former transmission site - proposed boat sales), churches, etc.}. The ordinance amendment established a limit on the number of temporary signs that could be issued for a commercial property limiting temporary signs to one sign per 24 months and gigu would be allowed for a maximum 3 month period. Original Ordinance ... ,, - -Temporary Signs. There shall be no more than one temporary (3 months or less) sign in any required area, and there shall be no more than three (3) such signs on any let, and the total area of such signs shall not exceed 25 square feet. Amended Ordinance in 1988 .... . _ Temporary Signs. There shall be no more than one temporary (three months or less) sign in any required yard area, and there shall be no more than three such signs on any lot, and the total area of such signs shall not exceed 25 square feet. Such signs require a temporary sign permit from the City. No such permit shall be issued by the City if a conditional use permit under Sub-paragraph A of this Subdivision or a temporary sign permit under this sub-paragraph had been issued in the previous 24 months to that property. No such signs shall be allowed in residential zones unless permitted as election or sales signs under this Subdivision. The Navarre business community has voiced major concern with the limitation of one sign per every 24 months noting temporary signs may only be on the property for a 2-week period of time at the most and that a three month time period s not realistic. Staff has reviewed temporary sign ordinances with other communities. The majority of the ordinances allow a specific number of temporary signs within a o.ne year period. Temporary Signs in Commercial Districts December 13, 1990 Page 2 are asked to provide direction on the following issues. 1. Number of temporary signs per calendar year. 2.Duration of that temporary permit (10 days, 14 days, less, more). 3.Total area of such signs allowed (25 s.f. as currently allowed, 32 s.f., 50 s.f.) Proposed Ordinance Amendment Temporary Signs. There shall be no more than temporary calendar year, and for a period of not more than _ _ days per time or of the duration of the eventrhan aays pei. uxmc w.*. -- - - - - - - - - - Ifgr^Jp^o^rttr ITporVa^^r; fttfd^?h^al\* L^^^emo^ved^gm li^\=h!4!“no^ :;icee"d^^ fg:are“fre;. ?fer^ sh7?l°L:?;Sian snaxx hot; -------- - more than one temporary sign in any required if multiple signs are proposed, the total area of the signs shall not exceed ___ square feet.* •r considered as a single property for purposes of paragraph, and the use of the single temporary sign by tenants on the property shall be the property owner or designated manager who shall endorse in writing, all applications for sign permits. The owner or manager of the sign and the owner of the property shall be equally responsible for the proper location, maintenance, and removal of the sign. All temporary signs shall be located on a property so that they do not impede ^ obstructing vision of pedestrians or motor vehicle operators. •This area shall be the same allowed for a single temorary sign. Enclosure; Sign Ordinance Sections lav vt-': ;-. ■ I f;'r. r 5 10.60 within a buixaing^ and'^unoccupied trailers less aajoining propemiesf _____^ ^ ^ » than :0 feet: in lengeh, «hicn ate not storeo for oommerciat • s *--( ‘•Ho rear o£ the houssourtjoses, i£ sroreci -o -ne ceit /->*- feet or more from any property line. and a distance oc u 3ourc3t Ordinance no. 1/2 Effective Date: 1-1-75 crnhH 14 Wast- Materials. Waste material shall not be Subd. 14. • ~ cower svstem nor the sanitary sewer washed into the puolic storm fto do so from the system without £ics^ •^^'^i?^nrant®d a method of disoosal shall be City. If said p.crnit is not reauisition for devised wnicn wil- '1°^J:®5^^ot cause a detrimental effect to the permanent operation ana vill rather than adjacent land. ^hou^a the wa j^^^^ted and fenced as to be fluid, the storage area shall ail waste material, removed from public view. debris, refuse, garoage, "’^terials .,ept in an ^:f.in^rrn°ir;acr irnS^fn^l and no.^ons -ends. ^ 1.; nrcinaae No land shall be developed and no use shall be‘permitted that ^ runofS^ sh^ll'S! j"l?'c^Inn\\°li°in?o" f rco?r d^Vln“ c^u.na. .ending a.ea or other suitable facility. use sheU congestion on public Sv —eet , bacicinq from a parking spacethrough residential streets Ven_ioles backing t._ fhtu re\o=aterSit^in-^^^^^ any two intersecting street right-of-way lines. permitted tSa^em\V dan\«ous'1ad^^^^^^^ There shall be no e-^ectrical inr^lndina but not limited operation of any point of t-han that of the creator ofto radio and television reception other than that oc the disturbance. SBC. 10.61. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. ^“'’le Hn d\%t-!Vt%°'^su“b^>c/1S" Vd %riiowlngaccessory use in all aisc..ict j regulations: ORONO CC 379 (4-1-84) § 10.61 3. nn o -• a"--of-'’^'av. Privars signs are crohirited wirhin the decoraricns specified tiae not to tv the Council if a permit lor such a sign s sicn ce-T’- had been issueu in conditional use permit or tiii6 pr0vious 24 inoiitA^s to P-^ P Source 1 ')rdinance 5c^ 2nd Ser—ss Adopted: 7-2S--98 B. Flashing. Illuminated flashing signs shall not be permitted in any district C. Beams. cons-stinc'^of*a collectionan intermittent, steady or b«m =ons;St^^^^ or concentration of rays of light shail not oe t district. r If:- from t.he right-of-way line residential project of six or the purpose of selling or pro g exceed 48 square feet; a r^ore^dwelling /^for more^^ "^an industlrial acrea of commercial area of to exceed 96 feet of advertising ten acres or more, one ‘ ^ Such sign shall not.*tirface mav be erected upon t.he projjec- site. leSf^raSL 90% of the project is developed. p Fxist'na Signs. Signs existing on SeptemcerE. Existing sign ^ are a non-ccntorming 1967 which do not conrora to the reg use. f-“ ■ F '^’-af^ic Interference. No sign may be erected - ghace or color would interfere in Y that, by reason oc ru-cose of a traffic sign orway with the proper functioning or purpose or signal. G. Building Wall Signs. Signs "“^a’fi^not'be directly on the ”®^^,'5^l£\aj\tru^t'ure or feature in any painted on a fence, rocks or ^e attached directly fbv“n"^d1fes^°e"or^st.mx^a^^ Signs shall be “niidetef a! rs«u\"ture%r fastened to anorher structure. OBONO CC 380 (4-1-84) i 5 1C . 51 Sirns. Thera snail he no -or? v.nan --Q ‘-o'".cc'*arv I'thrae nicnrhs cr less) sacn in any recu«-.ac. /a*.^ * . . • « ____________ ^ M M «Mk •• ^ V*area, and there snail he no xore rhan three sucn signs on anyor.area,^.-.u -**=r- “-I shall non exceed 25 square rear, ana tne tocax freer the Citv. No such ual‘;it Tkall he issued by the City if a conditnonai usejerriar unde’- Sub-''aracrai:h A of tnis Subcivisacn c- a ^ancc-a-.. - • unaer auo _________ in the crevicuspermit under thiriub-caracraph had been issued in ^ 4-Ha+. 1 ----A’—V 'Ic such sterns shall be ailcwec in rnontns --od as ele'etien or sales signs underresiaenttax zones unxess cam-.----u -j-= this Subdivision. Source: Ordinance 55 2nd Series Adopted: 7-25-88 I Elect-on Siens. Election signs are cerr.ittea on with’^ thi’**v davs following the erection — --- ..^an Mo electiol ^ign'shall be perttitted in any "R" District sooner .nan two months preceding the election relating to .ne sign. ORONO CC 380-1 (4-1-84) irfi f T; • £ i • J . 0 Subd. 2. 3icr.s in ■•?.'•_ Discriczs. w'ichin ”?/• .iscric-s, the following signs are oernitrea; A. Nameplates. One nameolate sign cor each aweiiing ana -oc two scuare feet in area per surrace, ana sucn Sxgn oi “ ‘ Constructed a‘s to have more than two surraces. no sign shall oe so sign £or each dwelling gcoop ,ni-- snd such'sion shall not exceed six square le%t"n ^e^^L^siA-ace and no%lgn shall he so constructed as to have more than two suctaces. each permitted use or use bv conditional permit other ' shall not exceed twelve square i-eet in ar.a . n Illumination. Symbols, statues, sculptures and integrated architectural feature's^on^non-resicentiai^huildi^^ U not“Sre "rom"t.?e public right-of-way or adjacent residential '"'“Til b s'i-t 4v;c=«^Veai"Mvf uo°s4n shall exc-"f eiuht feet in height above t.he average grade !t/^l! sfgns may’ ae 'illuminated but such Lighting shall oe diffused or indirect. a 1 «;ians ip "3'' and -"I’’ Districts. Within the "3" and "I” Districts'nameplate signs and business signs are permittea subject to the following regulations: Source: Municipal Code^ Effective Data: 9-14-67 A "3-1", "B-2" and "3-4": Size. Within the 3-1 , ■•9-2" and ■•3-4" Districts, the aggregate square £o°tage of .ign slaJe per lot shall not exceed the sum °"%^‘’each f?ont foot of nol°°o==°upi>d "br-a buUdrng". “^^o individual sign shall exceed fifty square feet. Source: Ordinance No. 1/2 Effective Date: 1-1-75 individual sign surface shall exceed 100 square te.t. c "T-. Size. Within any "I" Orstrict, the aggregate squar^ footag; of sign space per lot shall not exceed the ORONO CC 381 43-1-94) I 1. ft^ aik-ATtfi'i r ik i r r* 5 10.61 Sfti J'Lfrindividual buildinc, plus one square upied by a building, sauare feec. Source: Municipal Code Sffaccive Date: 9-14-6 Wi':hin theQ "3—1" "3—2" and "3—4": Height. "O 1" "a-7" and* "3-4" ^Districts, no sign shall extend in heignt any P-W'u-,any feet may projec principal building Source: Ordinance No^ 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 E "3-3" and "I": Height. Within any "3-3" or I otsaaica, no si^n snail height above the highest r-inspr ten feet from any building. No sign ^nall he lo - |^c»“ding ten sauare feet may ^ro“:rjon^r-?- '-o n^M^A"afe=a-£ro.\ny Ouiiain,. c.,K^ d Purnose of Off-Street Parking and Loading tht*"public*’by*"establishinq ”'v“hToles^^i'n °ao‘c'o*rdanos ri\h'"^ne u°*mz\tro^*of°v%rilua "ts All applications £oc an occupancy ^r^wn^to sc3le and^ dimensioned !ndiLt!n“\*oca*tion o*£ of'^-streed parUn, and loading spaces in compliance with the following requirements. Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 A. AcDlication o£ Packing Rules in addition to the regulations and “ouUements cegacding this Chapter, the c-quira'd and non-cequired off-street parking shall apply i,-ir-t-<5 • off-stteet parking facilities m all use districts. Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 B Parking j”'"®"''tructu7e‘^ or°userfoc"whic.h®I Construction on September 1., September 14, 1967, butbuilding permit has been issued prior to Septemner ORONO CC 382 (4-1-84) r' To:Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building fi- Zoning Administrator Date:December 12, 1990 Subject: 3 (1) Municipal Facilities of Neighboring Cities In mid-1990 the City of Wayzata presented an inform.al plan before the Orono Council that proposed a public works facility including a fenced outdoor storage area on a property located in the RR-IB Residential Zone on the south side of Highway 12 just to the east of Busy Beaver Day Care and cemetery. This specific parcel is divided by the municipal boundaries of Wayzata and Orono and functions as a gateway to the City of Orono. It was the opinion of Wayzata's Council that our Code would allow a neighboring municipality to construct a municipal building as a permitted use. The City has heard no further from the City of Wayzata concerning the proposed use but Council did direct that the Code be amended to clearly reflect that municipal facilities allowed as permitted uses includes only those facilities owned and operated by the City of Orono. The present Code allows municipal buildings within all residential districts as a permitted use except for the RS District (Seasonal Recreational-Big Island). B-1, B-3, and B-4 Commercial Districts allow municipal buildings where the use conducted is customarily considered to be an office use. This would exclude any type of public works use within a commercial zone yet the Code would allow this use in a residential zone as a permitted use. B-5 allows all municipal buildings as oermitted uses similar to R districts. There is no reference in the Industrial Zone that would allow municipal facilities although several of the municipal type uses would be allowed under permitted or conditional uses. Staff has reviewed municipal facilities/buildings ordinances with the cities of Plymouth, Excelsior, Minnetonka and Minnetrista. Plymouth advised that municipal facilities/buildings were allowed in residential districts with conditional use permits. Excelsior allows muncipal buildings only within a commercial office district as a permitted use. Their Code did not distinguish between administrative or public works type facilities. Minnetrista allows municipal administrative and service buildings as a conditional use permit in residential 1 f [•v;- 'Ik i ; u. tfe t';. Municipal Facilities of Neighboring Cities Page 2 December 12, 1990 zones but would not allow industrial type municipal uses such as a public works. The City of Minnetonka requires a conditional use permit for all municipal uses in residential zones as well as in commercial and industrial zones. All confirmed that their Codec do not distinguish between their individual cities and neighboring cities. Staff would argue that it was never the intent of this ordinance to allow municipal facilities of other cities. The City of Excelsior's Code does reference municipal and other public buildings suggesting that another governmental unit could locate within the City and be subject to the local ordinance. The Orono Code does not distinguish between municipal and other public facilities. Based on Council's directive, the clarification in the Code can be made by a simple addition to Section 10.02 definition of municipal buildings. Municipal buildings or facilities shall include only those structures owned and operated by the City of Orono. For further clarification ycu may wish to add. .Public buildings or facilities of other governmental units shall be located in zoning districts where the use is allowed and only witli a conditional use permit. If the latter oart is added, staff would then have to amend the conditional use permit sections of only the commercial and possibly the industrial district to include a conditional use permit for public buildings or facilties of other governmental units. Staff would ask the City Attorney to review this matter prior to scheduling the ordinance for Council action. In reviewing the sections of the Code that involve municipal buildings/facilities. Planning Commission may wish to consider a broader amendment to this section of the Code in light of a proposed new municipal facility for the City that includes both administrative and public works structures. 1. Should any type of municipal facility be located in a residental zone as a permitted use ? The Code protects a commercial district by allowing only municipal facilities that propose office uses only. 2. Are public works type uses and structures compatible with residential neighborhoods? Are there residential zones where the use may be compatible? 3. Is a police department and associated uses compatible with residential neighborhoods? Are there residential zones where this use may be compatible? '7' Municipal Facilities of Neighboring Cities December 12, 1990 Page 3 If Planning Commission members feel an amendment of the current Code section is appropriate, staff will call for the required public hearing redefining the scope of the review. Enclosures; Section 10.20 - R-IA Isv ■W ■ 5.'- h ■ \ J ^4■ I A. ^ ^. r Referenced within R-IB, RR-IB, RR-IA residential zones Section 10.40 Section 10.42 Section 10.43 Section 10.44 B-1 B-3 B-4 B-5 f ^ •w r- f: § 10.20 • SEC. 10.20. R-IA ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Subd. 1. Purpose. The "R-IA" One Family P.esidential District is intended to provide a district which will alxow a combination of low density residential development and limited agricultural activity. Planned residential developments may be allowed by conditional use permit. The district shall have immediate access to highways and public sanitary sewei. y^ Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. Within any "R-l.^^" One Family Residential District, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: A. B. c. One family detached dwellings. Public owned parks and playgrounds. Municipal buildings."^ Subd. 3. Conditional Uses. Within any "R-IA" One Family Residential District, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit: A. Schools. Public schools and parochial or private schools which teach a curriculum similar to a public school provided no building shall be located within fifty feet of any lot line of an abutting lot in an "R" District and that a fence be erected fifteen feet or more from all street lot lines where the abutting use is for open play, and nursery schools providing fifty square feet of playground space per pupil. B. Churches. Churches including those related structures located on the same site which are an integral part, of the church proper, convents or homes for persons related to a religious function on the same site provided no building other than a residence shall be located within fifty feet of any lot line of an abutting lot in an "R" District. C. Clubs, Camps, etc. Golf courses, country clubs, tennis clubs, public swimming pools serving more t.han one family, scout camps, YMCA camps, YWCA camps, church camps, or private non profit parks, playgrounds and other similar uses. The principal structure for any of the above listed uses shall be 100 feet or more from any abutting lot in an "R" District, and accessory structures shall be a minimum of fifty feet from any lot line 7' •1> ■ - ORONO CC 279 (4-1-84) 1 f i . t’ ■ : § 10.40 SEC. 10.40. B—1 RETAIL SALES BUSINESS DISTRICT. Subd. 1. Purpose. The Retail Sales Business is intended to provide a district for businesses that supply commodities or perform a service primarily for residents in the surrounding neighborhood. The district may adjoin residential districts or other business districts which are subject to more restrictive controls. The district shall have immeoiate access to adequate highways and public sanitary sewer. Subd. 2. Application. All applications for a building permit in any "B-l“* Retail Sales Business District shall be reviewed by the Council and may be referred to the Planning Commission for review. / V Subd. 3. Permitted Uses. Within any "B-1” Retail Sales Business District, no structure or land shall be used except for one of the following uses or uses deemed similar by the Council: A. Retail and Service Businesses. The following neiahborhood retail sales and service businesses supplying commodities or performing a service primarily for residents in the surrounding neighborhood: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Arts and school supplies store. Banks and insurance companies. Barber and beauty shops. Bicycle sales and repair. Books, magazines, record shop. Drugs, candy, ice cream, soft drinks. cosmetics and other usual drug store merchandise. 7. Dry cleaning and laundry pick-up stations including incidental pressing and repair. 8. Garden supplies, florist shop. Gift or antique shops. Hardware store, paint store. 9. 10.11. Hobby shops, camera and photographic supply stores. 12. 13. 14. 15. repair stores. Jewelry shops and repair. Laundromats. Locksmith. Music, radio, TV, appliance sales and 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Newsstands. Office supply store, office machine store. Pet shop. Pipe and tobacco shops. Plumbing, electrical, heating, housewares. furniture, carpet store ORONO CC 332 (4-1-84) ■ MM P - § 10.40 . 21. 22. 23. Postal substation. Real estate sales. Retail food of all varieties and home supplies.24. 25. 26. 27. Sewing center and yardgccds . Sporting goods store. Tailor shops. . Temporary sales such as Christmas tree lots .28. 29. 30. 31. Travel bureau. Variety store. Wearing apparel stores shoe store Off-sale Liquor Store Source: Ordinance 29, 2nd Series Adopted: 2-23-07 y B Municipal Buildings. Municipal buildings where the use conduced is customarily considered to be an office use. sales Busires^DiVtrirno “^rcturl - lan^" sJialf L Is'ed" foTJnl of^he following uses except by conditional use permi . 1 r.moas For the servicing and repair of automobiles pro;ided ”7aVr functions are totally enclosed in a building. Stations. Subject to the provisions set forth in Section 10.61, Subdivision 18. C. Restaurants (daas I). Vood l°s customer while seated a line and taken to a selected by a '^ive entertainment nor intoxicating liquor sales are permitted in Restaurants (C Source : Ordinance 67, 2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 n Restaurants (Class II). Fast Food, Conven^ience, Drive-in, and £iquor Store theirfoo^ara'"counte? rn'ra^k^ag°ls %TarVd "ho^w rt‘’^?r ”er«rv intoxicating liquor or have live entertainment. E. Off-Street Parking. Off-street parking "hen the Sf-'Sfsfri'ct'anf A“n'the" sa»e°own%rship as the r a ! rh. "B" or "I" District and subject to those conditions as set forth in Section 10.61, Subdivision 4 and such other conditions as found necessary by the Council. ORONO CC 333 (4-1-84) tf’ bi'- fi 4' tv I. i 0 [l-i .) 10.42 SEC. 10.42. B-3 SHOPPING CENTER BUSINESS DISTRICT. Subd 1. Puroose. The "3-3" Shoppir.9 Center Business n,-Christ is intended to establish provisions for the designating of a district where a multiole building retail sales and service f l intearated des' id a coordinated pnysicai plan,facility with ..^ected. Sjch district shall be appropriately ^.o^din.-^ to an approved plan as provided bnoi?^ The%\strict shall have immediate access to adeqaate highways and public sanitary sewer. Subd 2 Aoplicatioii. The owner or owners of any -ract f i;,nd in the "3-3" ShODoing Center Business District may submit of land in the f ^se and development of all of such itKlcS Th"e°%op1s^d"^l"a^*'sh"a’irb% "Set ted "to ?he PUnJi Jq consid6C3tion and action. S.ihd 3 Single Control. In order that the purpose of management or supervision of a central authority. x/ Subd 4 Permitted Uses. Within the "3-3" Shopping center IsTntss uVstrict, no structure or land shall be use except for one or more of the uses permitted in the B L District. Subd 5 Conditional Uses. Within any "B-3" Shopping ^th^lllSrase^e^ct^V b;°c/n^dSal A. uses, one or mote of the conditional uses as permitted and regelated in the "B-1" Distrret, except for “Restaurants Center Identification Sign. <?iihd fi Accessory Uses. Within any "3-3" Shopping Center Business District, the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses: District. A.Any accessory use as regulated the "B-L" Subd. 7. Area, Height, Yard, Setback and Design Requirements. A Area. The minimum lot size shall be two B ^Ilor Area Ratio. A 28 FAR will be «:equired so that the gross leasable area shall not exceed 28% of the total area available. ORONO CC 343 (4-1-84) mmm 1; ■ - ^■; § 10.42 L. Fencing. Wherever a "3-3" Shopping Center Business District abuts or is across the street ^ District an adeauate fence or compact evergreen hedge not less than 5M ooague n'or less than six feet in height shall be erected. When adjacL? to a street, it shall not be less than three feet nor mors than four fast in hsight. M. Building Dasign and Construction. See Section 10.40, Subdivision 6, Subparagraph G. N Height. No structure or building shall exceed 2-1/2 stories or thirty feet in height except as provided in Section 10.75. SBC. 10.43. B-4 OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. Subd 1 Purpose. The "B-4" Office and Professional Business is intended to ^ovide a district which is related to and mav adjoin residential districts or other business districts for the loca*-ion of administrative office buildings and ® The office uses allowed in this district are those in Which there is lilted contact with the public disolav or selling of merchandise to tne general public. The district shall have immediate access to adequate highway public sanitary sewer. Subd. - ^Application. All applications for a building nprmit in anv "B-4" Office and Professional District shax ?“?e«erby \he Council and may be referred to the Plannrng Comraissiotv for review. v/subd. 3. Permitted Uses. Within any ^ Professional Business District, no structure or Land shall be except for one or more of the following uses: v/ A. Municipal Buildings. Municipal the use conducted is customarily considered to be B. Offices. Professional offices and offices ot the general nature. Clinics for human care on an out patient basis Insurance Offices. subd. 4. conditional Uses. Within Professional Business District no structure or land shall be u e for the following uses except by conditional use permit. A. Nursing Homes, Hospitals. ^uafi hospitals, rest homes or retirement h°mes, provided^the^site ^_^^^_^ contain not less than 600 square feet of i,»cs than 35 to be accommodated and that no building be located les feet from the side lot line. ORONO CC 345 (4-1-84) § 10.43 2 Setback Requirements. Mo building shall be nearer than 35 feet to any front lot line, 35 feet to any rear lot line 15 feet to anv side lot line, 35 feet to any side lot line adiac'ent to Street; exceot when abutting or across the street .rom an Dis?trc“%o bnilding shall be less than 35 Ceet from such lot line. F. Fencing. Wherever a "3-4" Office and Professional Business District abuts an "R" District along the side or rear lot line, a fence or compact evergreen hedge not less than loJooacue norfess than six feet in height (no less than three feet Mt‘higher than four feet adjacent to street) shall be erected along the abutting lines except within the required front yard. G. Building Design and Construction. See Section 10.40, Subdivision 6, Subparagraph G. H Drainage. No land shall be developed and no use ?e^^"fr4'’bv^h: C^tnci“and'’^hose%!L"s1h%U b"e r^viewedU the EyHo/\pp^ro^al! -sSc”^ = f-J^^ channeled into a natural water course, ponding area, storm drain or other public facilities. Any change in grade affecting JJ^ter runoff whether onto adjacent property or , wg compliance with the Surface Water Management Plan , consistent with other applicable regulations or ® provisions and subject to the approval of other agencies having jurisdiction over the area affected by the drainage. I Height. No structure or building shall exceed 2-1/2 stories o‘r thirty feet in height except as provided in Section 10.75. SBC. 10.44. B-5 LIMITED NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT. ,rs;v lelidentrin thrru°1rounding° ^ighbo^hood high ccaffic genecatocs and do notof hardcover. The district may adjoin residential ^istriCwS or ^the? bSrir^s districts which are subject to more restrictive controls The district shall have immediate access to adequate highways and public sanitary sewer. Because of the location of the "B-5" District as contemplated in the area known as Navarre ^ha*' City, the uses ace limited in order to limit the hardcover in tha. area and to limit the future generation ?/ /“AaeJi,' property in that use district since there is already a problem in Navarre. ORONO CC 347 (4-1-84) ‘•W* '.ii- i SiJ- ^15' 5 10.44 Subd. 2. ADDlication. All applications tor a building oerniit in any ”8-5” Limited Neighborhood Business District shall be reviewed by the Council and referred to the Planning Commission for review. Subd. 3. Permitted Uses. Within any ”3-5'' Business District, no structure or land shall be used except for one or the following uses or uses deemed similar by the Council: A. B. C. D. R. F. Municipal buildings. Offices. Clinics. Art and school supply store. Book and magazine store. Office supply store. estate office. G. Banks, loan company, insurance company, real H. I. J. K. L. Barbership, beauty shop. Camera and photograph supply store. Locksmith. Hobby shop. Gift store. M. N. O. P. Q. R. Glassware and pottery Antique store. Jewelry store. Watch repair. Library. Museum. S. T. U. V. W. Record shop. Music store. Tobacco shop. Galleries. Pet shop. Subd. 4. Conditional Use. A. Within any "B-5" Limited Business District, no structure or land shall be used for one of the following uses gxcept by conditional use permit: desserts, soft drink store. 1. Candy, ice cream, popcorn, nuts, frozen .V 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Drycleaning store. Tailor shop. Pressing and shoe shine shop. Laundry and cleaning pick-up stations Home and garden equipment rental. Veterinary clinic. Kennels. ORONO CC 348 (4-1-84) 1 J r-. Prom: Date: Subject: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator April 8, 19yi #1631 Charles S Ann Hommeyer, 475 Linden Avenue - Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) - Applicant seeks renewal of a lot area variance granted November 23, 1987. Once again as with the original application, there is no plan for development. Applicants merely seek approval of a buildable lot for future development. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I “ Exhibit J - Exhibit K - Exhibit L - Exhibit M - Application Applicants' Addendum Property Ov/ners List Plat Map Staff Memo of 2/9/87 Staff Memo of 11/13/87 Staff Memo of 11/19/87 Survey Lot Survey of 21 Lot Neighborhood As-built of Sewer Service Topography/Watershed Cook's Update Report 4/3/91 Approval Resolution #2300, Approved 11/23/87 Review of Renewal Application - Please review the enclosed staff memos for more detail and background on this area variance application. No changes are proposed from the original application. As with the earlier review, drainage is the major concern. The City Engineer has been asked to review the current application for comment (see Exhibit L). Gustafson asks for drainage plans prior to construction on property. Please review the approval resolution that sets forth the findings and conditions of the earlier approval. If approved, staff would recommend the adoption of the former resolution with one minor change to omit the condition that would ask for a Park Dedication Fee of $390.00. Staff is reminded that there is no clear authority with the current Park Dedication Fee Ordinance to ask for Park Dedication for lots previously platted. Staff recalls with the earlier review the hesitation on the part of members of the Planning Commission to act on a lot area variance application without building plans for development. If Members can find something in our Code that would suggest we are limited in reviewing and acting on this area variance. Members may chose to table and ask for development plans. Absent any clear direction in the Code, staff recommends approval of the renewal variance subject to the findings and conditions of Resolution #2300, but excluding Condition #2. K J OWNER (if different than applicant) Name iy\4i lL-3( CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) * \i PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 'fcvi(£^j^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) oC> • // 7 • ^ ^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. L X i t LftT7-A.;rr ‘cryc ' f ICL APPLICANT Name f Address : /// A 5 O^A 3 T'_________ Phone (home ) Vr.b- O^jU- .. w . w ,. - ta V V T-i \.ZT\'?w i w 1 w » w Phone (worIc) ‘7^ =2(!~9iO Avi iiOl 716’ci _____ Zip: ■ fS Q 03/21/91City; (^(rvnc? Phone (home) Phone (wor)c) Address: t*T5S KO\x,-.,& h\ocP City: (y4<________Zip: 5 ‘S55 ^ Date Property Acquired _ _^ 'S'^ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ (mcnth/year) I (do) (Tdo^not,) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District / /? • /^ Present Use of Property (/4C a^7 Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $, Describe request in detail; ^Oortanct^ pr<?i/tovs(<^ ^7- VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) Other M BARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; g■^pv^ cicrr, ik_ _ _ _ I ^ ryi^ 2>gn , Thr'^f •'■$ ddjcm ir^'^ r> rv i) r c./?-! /? 4’/iJ __________________________ DESCRIPTION OP UNDSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: Moftr' p,hn(-i4( rlru’^rjgjm QCfjfnfS^cd I'n nr^t/tou£ tr 2. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8J5"xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll"). Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8*5"xll"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that yoor variance application is not complete if the above infonnation has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of tM^-^peuquest. Date 3'”2-/'"*^'/________Owner's Signature Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. k’.-JTH.tiLf J J - L'-'i • / J J ”7 I 1 ,1 j March 19, 1991 TO: Jeanne Mabusth, Planning and Zoning Administrator city of Orono RE: Application for Renewal of Variance - 475 Linden Drive FROM; Charles and Ann Hommeyer The following submittals are included: 1) Completed variance application. 2) Data privacy advisory. 3) The Renewal Variance fee of $100.00. 4) Certified property owners list and stamped envelopes. 5) Plat Map 6. Hard cover calculations are already on file and not included. 6) Copies of surveys and other supporting data from existing file. 7) Staff letters to Planning Commission dated 11/13/87. 8) Notice of Planning Commission action 11/19/87 and resolution of City Council granting prior variance dated 11/23/87. w-tk i : ^ Am -k \ DATE 03/ia/91 \ BATCH 001 PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAHE TAi<PAYER NA»£/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OmER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OHHER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR .t . i i: 1 38 08-117-E3 14 0020 . 00405 TONKAHA RD K 4 C DEDOLPH III KARL A CHRISTINE DEDOLPH C/0 KNUr-KOUPEE PO BOX 8630 HPLS HN 55408 i, f ir ij. t t i i. 36 06-117-23 41 0021 00480 LINDEN AVE JOHN D ALBERS JOHN DAY ALBERS 480 LINDEN AVE LONO LAKE NN 55356 » 438 06-117-23 41 0025 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED COUNTRYSIDE KANA6EHENT INC COUNTRYSIDE HANA6E»^NT INC 1935 H HAYZATA BLVD ( LONG LAKE HN 55356 ^ . t 30 06-117-23 41 0028 ■ 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED COUNTRYSIDE HANAGEHE^^• INC COUNTRYSIDE HANA6EHENT INC 1935 H HAYZATA BLVD LONG LAKE HN 55356 .1 i!36 06-117-23 41 0031 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED C A A HOHHEYER « CHARLES A AM4 HOHHEYER ; ] 4125 OAK ST M LONG LAKE HN 55356 1 I f •* S8 06-117-25 41 0088 00425 TONKAHA RO A BYRNE PETER 'A BYRNE PETER 425 TONKAHA RD LONU LAKE HN 55556 6 I * ii »► • i I) • I I u .■•ijr. 1 HENNEPIN COUNTV PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM ' PROPERTY OHNERS LIST S 38 06-117-25 41 0019 00480 LINDEN AVE JOHN D ALBERS JOHN DAY ALBERS 480 LINDEN AVE LONG LAKE FM 55356 n r 38 06-117-23 41 0022 00480 LINDEN AVE JOHN D ALBERS JOhN UAY ALBERS 480 LINDEN AVE LONG LAKE M4 55356 li. *•» i 38 06-117-23 41 0026 ti 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIG^'ED COUNTRYSIDE HANAGEMENT INC COUNTRYSIDE MANAGEMENT INC 1935 H HAYZATA BLVD LONG LAKE MN 55356 li 38 06-117-23 41 0029 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ROBERT T ROBERT T 4127 OAK ORONO HN WARSTLER WARSTLER ST 55356 w •r h f* I38 06-117-23 41 0032 00038 ADDRESS UTUSSIGNED K B ROLLAfA) A K S RODEN KENNETH B HOLLAND A 4119 OAK ST LONG LAKE HT4 55356 K RODEN \ 8: . 38 06-117-23 41 0094W 04111 OAK ST DAD SIEGEL DAVID H SIEGEL 4111 OAK ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 StI 6, t r i. ^ • • i-.t 1. i REPORT NO. P1435401.r PAGE • 6 'Mr ’ I.'' •' r..- i': '■ t/. ’ 4 » rt » • 38 06-117-23 41 0020 00480 LINDEN AVE JOHN 0 ALBERS , . JOHN DAY ALBERS ' 480 LINDEN AVE LONG LAKE W 55356 r.i *• k ‘■i;- 'll i iv *r *. *' I*.1 38 06-117-25 41 0025 00480 LINDEN AVE ' JOHN DAY ALBERS JOHN DAY ALBERS • 480 LINDEN AVE LOt« LAKE MN 55556 i-r' ,1 I f. »; >• «< • t •0 ’• • * !• • •i . u • ^ * » • 4 • 1 •• 4 1 • 1 58 06-117-25 41 0027 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNt. COUNTRYSIDE MANAGEMENT INC COUNTRYSIDE MANAGEMENT INC 1935 H HAYZATA BLVD LOTJG LAKE FM 55356 I •6 • (r t *r. ‘ ii 38 06-117-23 41 0030 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIC^D ’ C H HOHHEYER A A H HOHHEYER >4 CHARLES A ANN HOHHEYER 4125 OAK ST LONG LAKE Hi 55356 ^ ) ‘ A .t • \ I • f I 38 06-117-23 41 0036 04119 OAK ST K B HOLLAND A K S RODEN KENNETH ROLLANO/KAREN ROOEN 4119 OAK ST . LONG LAKE MN * 55356 #4 * t.' •{ .1 A- w V 1 » , t » . I ' t: •> 44 ■ * i • 1- 38 06-117-23 41 0095 04105 OAK Sr • D H A S L ILSE * DAVID H A SHEROKEE ILSE 4105 OAK ST LONG LAKE HN " 55356 i! i . 4 * Mi LL'J:,: i . ’1 . i' i. • ..Vf‘ ri i t T ^ I I II 7 : - - f t e f- t •• * f ■ . r u i * • »• »• ' f S ii: > i .4 I \i'.'riil:"* I* :• . »* . I ; r'• I * \ • ■ • i M ' 1' RUN DATE OS/ia/91 » BATCH 001 . I HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY Ot^RS LIST • f PROP ADOR OI#4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR !l n 58 06-117-25 A1 0100 00458 LINDEN AVE H 0 DIETRICK-BLOCKER ET AL \ H 0 DIETRICK-BLOCKER 458 LINDEN AVE LONG LAKE MN 55556 V yX: ;.r. i . •»• r . 1 Ifr •* 1 ; ; i ' 1 i f ,<; • •i 3 y •-ft I,(■ * t . 1 .* 'jf .'i-* ' : . ' • -1 •• 1 ■■ 1 . ' ■ j t •i 5 ■/ .r- » !ft i 1 *.l-'f : V.j r 1 ■ •^ .» .. • * k j*, ' 1 . f i .f• < ft . 1 M itj #;• • T . •«l-i ♦ • • ft 11 I > » '2 * ii:; 4 * :ll I • * t • t.. il :J ‘J' J i It V 38 06-117-23 91 0103 h 09085 OAK ST *V.TAB ARGABRI6HT TIMOTHY A BARBARA ARGABRIGHT 9085 OAK ST ?, LONG LAKE 55356 ’> 4*t • i’- h i % • > .1 TOTAL BATCH » i ^. REPORT NO. PI455401 PAGE t ? * i,- /t I i t ! 001 00020 ^ I iU]• !• i 1 ft i r I 5:f; . !*i-• r ^ I • I > i 1 iV iu i- i I \ ‘ i ' ^ I ^ 'V* • ' I* ' 1 i > » V. * ft . * I -V.- t ^ r-‘ I ■. .li.'l' •: . i • Jl-- r-i* »J I ■ ''* i * ! t I f IV ' ’ ' I'i ^ ;• i"* . . .. f J . ifIr- •;I • ^ '• !.rV 1 • ^ • • '» « i\,. i** ■ |K> . -'-.i •:w. ZUitu&M' »■ A I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUT4TY DEPART|1ENT, OF PROPERfY TAXATION, TO^ THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. DAT 4 *v u I • . ...r, i 1 .• » ‘ i ■ t*V" ■n . , ;j, r . .. ■■'. ».♦ 'tr'-. -. .1*. i . ' .. > 1;.» • I ' f : • A.» II’ I • « ♦ > » 4 V ... I. r -: 'TT^?.rr . V J-A [’ i / /•- / V*v. *• *t‘; ' • •• -r* -1 5 =E5 A 7 . • • • i' ■ ■ ’ B (?g; •16 6/? ?I -4 I * 'V > - I % i noWyK^sJeH i (•■•V * k * • =. •'• *^: • ■ ■* ■ ■•■ . .•■. •;•■• "• :■;• ■ ••: * 574 Ti s;? 6>a «T1 5 «e4 (16) ’ .'. ■ 1* > S l■''■t'" “ifl5 ic l\ •9 —f f,’.'5! ?3C •-I f ••) U ’P'.L q• 1 i (26) sB "^ » ’4 # / J •x|-2 7 '5 (’0)« n)q• i (In '<f » ■1 iZV1 ^ S( *4)•* N S*N ’7 (X.o 7 (22)( ’5) ^ n :R ; 4 R ITO 49 5* 40 (2o:(• ^ 7( ’6) ^0 19C) .**»: f92)S * ^ 7 1 i.'-'QC c 9 « ?R a'j s 7 ‘•’^r / ■ 'f^/*R •0 R,. ^ T7)7 \/ *>'^ 9 -10 R 9 /• •29 R^ **• 123 7 CAK I'•» . * sitox 9 ■» f&4) • *. 'It ’5 S JB(99] ^ '3J »5 n ^ ^ '0 3 ’0(56) 9 ’4! '•9 oe / , •»(9€) ' I V » N.s R t ,.! ’;2) ■'i a6M • ■ •■ « '■. • . .* J!%- ... k !,•’•*. , * /S !4 (60) e-■“'. > l‘1’ . »?C7I T' ; ** « JS! ^ 1 14 T? ■" 1 Sen/ LJL ^2, JL (8'1 9 :r m e •tot Oatas SubjectI Orono Planning Commission Members Michael P. Gaffron* Asst Planning i Zoning Administrator February 9, 1987 •1107 Milliam Lewis and K. Trettelr 475 Linden Avenue - Renewal Variance ** Public Bearing i^klieatloBt Renewal Lot Area Variance List of Bshiblta Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B •> Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit B > P'ut Map Showing Local Ownership Pattern Pertinent Pacts* Lot Area: Let Width: Required 1.0 Ac 140* Existing 0.61 Ac 200'-plus Variance 0.39 Ac Average Lot Sise (of 21 neighboring developed lots within 500'): 0.59 Ac (See Exhibit B) Disenssion:« I i This is a request for renewal of a lot area variance originally granted in I960. The property is surrounded on three sides by right- of-way and on the north by a large occupied tract. If Linden Avenue is considered as the fronts the lot exceeds the minimum width requirement. Setbaclcs for the property would be 35* from all 3 dedicated roads and 10' from the north line. This leaves a building envelope 180' wide ranging from 33' to 60' deep* which should be suitable for construction of a single family home without the need for additional variances. The 4 lots have each been assessed 1/4 unit for sewer, and a sewer stub is available. >* ( OeveloiSBent on the property will not change the existing drainage pattern in the neighborhood. However, the approval should be conditioned on no obstruction of existing drainageway from the north through the rear of the property. /fr sf . i'-' S Zoning Pil« §1107 Pobruary 10, 1987 Pag* 2 of 2 Staff Wnrr—imiUl limi Staff would rocommend approval of the lot area variance renewal, finding thati a) Thore is no additional land available for purchase to make this a conforming parcel. b) The let area is consistent with that of other developed lots in the neighborhood. c) The variance was previously aranted in 1980. d) Sewer is available and has been assessed for a total of 1 unit. a e) Ample area exists on the lot to develop a single family residence and appurtenant improvements without the need for further variances. Approval subject tot 1. Setbacks of 35' from the west, south and east lot lines, and • V* 10* from the north lot line. 2. Payment of park fee of $390 at the time a building permit is . - issued. * # 3. Legal combination of all 4 lots into one tax parcel must be ' and accepted by Hennepin County prior to issuance of building penalt. 4. Improvements to the property may not change the drainage pattern in the neighborhood. 5. Hardcover allowed (2/3 in 250-500', 1/3 in 500-1,000') may not exceed 8,360 s.f. on the property. .•ey A ^ t a n,-.«N r.?f -t. ik:' ••* c-v. • <% V ' •/ '^ I'a* ypy-^^^Plaoninq Cc—Isaion Chairaan Kelley Conission Members ■' • Adainisttator Bernhardson Asst Planning t Zoning Administrator 4 . -r«'» • -h/ ^ #• ‘ -a-V ;■ ■rri'ths--- ..^Boveabac 13» 1987 .r^. '* ..■> j _ • 7 rBil 1 iaa Lewis 6 Kathleen Trettel, 475 Linden - Continuation of Publici'-^iit^’ •?■ . .'?• *4? ,r ' .-- -r,..*, . t • r i - r—rr--> •*••••-- ■ — ^ tabled on 2/17/87 ir, .for applicant to present. :V. --■ % „ WOIBi -This 4tea was ij^'SJ^^^ibe'.present. :V. --■ '*?>Application -:Lot, area'variance for construction of a residence; '^9^^ fe! ?. C '.Exhibit A .. ■ ■».•-r*;. vV ^_ .». . ‘ ^ f •.^’.Exhibit B ■./f;r.'.^> .V. : ‘ .Exhibit C - •* , -m* • > • ■ •* ? : .f • ** ^ * «' Exhibit D - /- • '» '« • ' . .Exhibit E •• - • Exhibit P • • • *• w . ^ S e ^ ^ * •'• ’ • • ' •. > * Exhibit G • e • - • l ••Mt .r-:. r 2/17/87 vf • • 1 • . e • • .*ws lljk. . i. -i t . • •% .' - .4: * ‘ - ■ .»> PBBTIHBHT PACTS Xoning Distrlst - LR-IB Lot Area Seqnlred - 1.0 Acre Lot. Area Sxistlng - 0.61 Acre *. Variaace^Previoosly Granted 1980 T ^ * -r, ................ Olacusslon -' ... i >< -•^-.* 7-.T |••n.-v.T•• Y *. - ' The applicant'JLlyes but of.state, hence the extended tabling of-; rbhis...iten;.until'rapplicaht was able to be present. ?.• -?i• ,« • ----, r- . , . ^...................... ......... . • ^ - ' ■ * ♦ “'••.• i.* w^«. - •. '*<»'• li 1.1' y;';:'-r'K'>.vvl9^7.r«^ -property "owners submitted a lettef'^bf the aeeting. The item was\tabled --''-“ .to.,:dlscu8S the various issues;Itandv^i^S^ •V4.vn further,.inforaation-regarding the drainageway and culvert.'^^'-^-""”" ‘ .4'%.*y-r^*'* On-^2y24yirT. < Anil lXXyxoyfi7 oiA^ wi^K *9 r%n {A A V* • p? 1 AMTe'i r.Cowiissldn ^£irst r6vi6wcd this application in *Psbiruary 1 aa«i “.MiiHA;/AAI 4 *____________ 1 m • • : r- >c * U^' - . ; 7^-tJJk^^ tT. .-aT-.fc>-»-rT* 'Ii«i;p • . .. .. , „ . _ , • - .J • •• • VW — \ A ,V * *■• • ' .. . . «w . . -•* • • c. V — . * V «• ■4*' M. t< .. t -.. *"v k ^'T ; The'site appears to be quite buildable but drainage concetM*will;; . .. *-■**'..* pf--'.. <m». w.'.r*.. * I‘ I*,»«k».i,^ •. «» » 1..»’ '•'. * * . »*"*»•*, •.*, v.«‘» '•.» .• •• ■ '««.-. '* '.T ■' - ::*5. -■* ■ • * .•—•f - •«• - *■ •." . <’ ■* »- t t** I n -V 'v' •4 !•- > I » ».* , .#• '.I t- ' have ..to' be properly addressed. - Therevis no defined drainageway at the rear or west side of the property^ but it is a lower area that appcears to act as a saddle drainageway between the property to the north and the culvert to the south. . - The watershed does not appear to be extremely large (4.5 acres calculated by HPG on 3/2/87) per existing 1 inch per 100 ’ topography. - Development of the property will likely require some fill. A grading plan should be required at the time a house is proposed, for review and approval by the City Engineer. Grading and fill must be done so that existing flows can be maintained on the property and not impede existing drainage patterns and rates. This appears to be feasible. The privately constructed and maintained culvert at the driveway crossing serving the neighboring properties to the west is in an undeveloped right-of-way. It is In poor condition suffering major erosion damage at the south, or outlet, end. This driveway will not be used for access to applicant's property, but all run off from their property will go through this culvert, hence the i additional run-off created by a residence on the property will make use of the culvert. The property would appear to receive some benefit from the existance of the culvert and driveway which serve to limit further gullying of applicant's property. It would appear that the Initial work to get this culvert back into shape will include additional fill around the outlet, perhaps a drop culvert structure at the outlet, some rip-rapping around the inlet and outlet ends and excavation of a slightly larger storage area at the inlet end and construction of a baffle weir. The probable coot of such work is in the neighborhood of $5,000 (rough estimate by City Engineer). Who should pay these costs of the culvert upgrade? Staff suggests that the two property owners directly benefitting are Hoameyer at 4125 Oak Street and Roland and Roden at 4119.Oak Street. The applicant property owner receives an indirect benefit by the existence of the culvert, and a portion of the necessary repairs and.upgrade would have to occur on the applicant's property. Arguably other property owners upstream of-- the culvert receive an indirect benefit from it and arguably* the Siegel property at 4111 Oak Stt'-set and other properties along Oak Street are contributing to the outlet end erosion problem and could also be conceivably-ihvolv e<3 • in cost sharing.^^ Staff'notes that if this .was to be a public storm "sewer project with'all benef itted _;property owners being assessed the^ att^ni^jitj^f^^-'^^^^ ..eng ineer ing" and...legal-.ecoots - could easi 1 y ' tr iple the $5,'000 ;e.stimated pr'ice ?tag. -Staff rwould suggest "that the .cpstsjpf,^,^'- ;upgrade and vmaintenance ofthe.culvert should -fall-primarily .“Vv ' •• the two property owners rlwho^benefit directly 'and ^could/targuably..^^^>^^^^^ V.-'»‘he 'shared - by...the *applicant •property "owner "as wel 1 as" lJl- . ..p*^op*fty.owners in the neighbor hoed who benefit by the culwe!tt;,r;5v^ being located Iwithin the driveway, that serves to halt-gully ' -erosion. " ■ . - ■ .. .I-• • ‘ -r ,• vr , jr •4- \ri.V -■r TTl*"* ' I' *.... ** • ^ •**** r V.' •r: V, a • I I: h V When should the work be completed? If the Planning Commission and Council feel that applicant should share in the costs of a private culvert upgrade project, then the other two directly benefitted owners must also agree to spend money at this time.... It would seem there needs to be some agreement cn all sides in order for this upgrade to happen privately. If the neighboring property owners insist that the project become a public project, shared by all benefitting property owners, whether their benefit is direct or indirect, then the attendant costs of such a project will undoubtably rise. Staff recooDsendatioa Staff would reconmend approval of the lot area variance renewal finding that: A. There is no additional land available for purchase to make this a conforming parcel. B. The lot area is consistent with that of other developed lots in the neighborhood. C. The variance was previously granted in 1980. D. Sewer is available and has been assessed for a total of one unit. E. Ample area exists on the lot to develope a single family residence and a pertinent improvements without the need for further variances. Approval is subject to; 1. Setbacks of 35 feet from the west, south and east lot lines and 10 feet from the north lot line. 2. Payment of park fee of $390.00 at the time a building permit is issued. 3. Legal combination of all four lots into one tax parcel must be filed and accepted by Hennepin County prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Hardcover allowed (2/3 in 250-500', 1/3 in 500-1000') may not exceed 8,360 square feet on the property. , ' > .H. ‘ v".' —‘ . V. ■ * * - ft! rr,. . • V V »*-»•.. 1- ^ * • 4* ^ - .H- ^ wrV * • 5. Applicant shall grant a drainage easement over the westerly and southerly 10 feet of the property. () ~ ^__ J i Improvements to the property may not ohan^O' the drainage pattern in the neighborhood. Applicants .shall "share in the costa and shall share in the resjwnsibility "for improvements to the drsinageway and culvert.*.^- underneath the driveway serving the two propertlM tO:>^'Vt ! i I i r » <•.. ■* V-*" ■ •T.. -s' • ^ .i*. • ..*. •4. ' .tr •'. • • r< s .. i--- ’ f • -r - #•I ir ■• *w ’ .^' ^ - 'r . .V , H'v ' ' >■*'*'« the west. Applicant agrees to allowing (and sharing responsibility for) necessary drainageway improvements within applicant's property boundaries, such improvements may include, but are not limited to the following: a. Culvert inlet upgrade including baffle weir or drop structure; b. Excavation of a larger storage area just above the culvert. 7. Applicant is advised to attempt to work with the two directly benefitted property owners in order to facilitate minimal expenditures of private funds to accomplish the drainage improvements. . V »►.. fT •• ^ e ^ •* . e • •■ *v • V-. . • . «. V. I *■ . -.: • e;' • v< ■ -W.- t . * • \ V* •**. rvi***‘*^ •'* * .* ■ T.: X . ^ ft ftft • - ' ^ % m • » • **.> *.*• •.**.*^*» .*^ • P' V-( ftV - ►X' 'j. v>.*W‘•• ** •■'O' > •I Vi ^ r*.-."^.. -.' -•/•• i .i ■<» •i" •■ ♦ - ' .^*‘m’ •' '< - r X'^ ^ _ • % "»■ ^ *» the west. Applicant agrees to allowing (and sharing responsibility for) necessary drainageway improvefflents within applicant's property boundaries, such imnrntfAmAn^a mjitr {nr^lnHa ^ I l u witnin applicant's property Dounaaries^ such improveaents may include, but are not limited to the following: a. Culvert inlet upgrade including baffle weir or drop Btructurei b. Excavation of a larger storage area just above the culvert. 7. Applicant is advised to attempt to work with the two directly benefitted property owners in order to facilitate minimal expenditures of private funds to accomplish the drainage improvements. - - w..’ *rv * '*?! '• • . « V v». • • rgf • . • - . . * . • . ^ • V* • ^ . e- -• • ^ V • r’..» .. . - • V . .M'-.vrV-•- - f • . v^‘ ; W .• . * 4 U • %• '*1 "A *' . * F’w • v ’ . . , * * 7^ -r . < A- *,.*:• : . ■' \ • V.;: . * •• \ • , * t • -mu . ■ ^ ■ • V ‘ ^1-.- • i *■ •« *• • >? .. - - i--------#VWW^'W-.» . '*■ • •# ‘ . r>>■ :.'y '' ' •»* • *4v^;-r *23 r. i ■ - it•« V*- «. * i • .• .' •** '-%*... ■ ; Tos Datet Mayor Grabek i Orono Council Members Michael P. Gaffron# Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Moveaber 19, 1987 <5- Sobjaets 11107 Wllliaa Lewis « Kathleen Trottel, 475 Linden Avenue > Jtenewal Variance - Resolution apjpHwi •> area variance for construction of a residence* List of Itshihtts Exhibit A - Proposed Resolution Bx^blt B • Planning Coaaission Action Notice of 11/19/87 Exhibit C - Memo a Exhibits of 11/13/87 PertlBMit Facts ** Zoning District - LR>1B Lot Area Required - 1.0 acre Lot Area Existing - 0.61 acre Variance Previously Granted in 1980 Dlsesssloo • Please review the memo and exhibits of 11/13/87. The applicants propose to construct a residence on the property within the next year or two* Issues discussed by the Planning Commission and neighboring property owners Included maintenance of open space in the neighborhood, and concerns about the effect of development of that lot in relation to existing drainage patterns In the neighborhood. A portion of the discussion centered around whether or not applicants should share in the costs of Improvement and maintenance of the culvert underneath the access driveway to the properties to the west. Staff noted that although the driveway and culvert are within City right-of-way they were privately constructed and have been privately maintained. The City does not maintain Oak Street past. Its Intersection with Linden Avenue* Planning Cosunlssion reviewed this application at Its November 16th ls>87 meeting and recommended approval of the lot area variance finding that: A) There Is no additional land available for purchase to make this a conforming par.^1. B) The lot area Is consistent with that of other developed lots in the neighborhood. C) The variance was previously granted In 1980* D) Sewer Is available and has been assessed for a rotal of one unit. E) Ample area exists on the lot to develop a single family residence and pertinent Improvements without the need for further variances. Zoning Fllo *1107 Hovnaibor 19# 1987 Pago 2 o£ 3 s;-; s. •• A j« - i, T -o'- . •4 * k f Planning CowLaalon recoomended that that approval bo subjoct to: 1. Sotbacka of 35* from tho woat# south and oaat lot llnoa and 10 from tho north lot lino. Faymrat of Fairlc /«« of f390.00 at tho tlmo a boildlng paraic iaaood. 3. Logal combination of all four lota into ono tax pareol must be filod and accoptod by Bennopin County prior to Issuance of a building permit. 4. Bardcovox* allowed (2/3 in 250-500'; 1/3 in 500-1,000’) may not exceed 8,360 s.f. on the property. 5. Applicants shall grant a drainage easement over the westerly 10* and southerly 10* of the property. 6. Improvements to the property shall not have an adverse effect upon the drainage pattern in the neighborhood. Applicants shall share in the costs and shall share in the responsibility for improvements -o the drainageway and culvert underneath the driveway serving the two properties to the west. Applicants agree to allowing and sharing responsibility for necessary drainageway Improvements within applicants property boundaries. Such improvements may include but are not limited to the following: A) Culvert inlet upgrade including baffle weir or drop structure. B) Excavation of a larger storage area just above the culvert. 7. Applicants are advised to attempt to work with the two directly benefitted property o%mers to the west in order to facilitate minimal expenditures of private funds to accomplish the drainage improvements. 8. Prior to Issuance of a building permit, applicants shall provide a detailed grading and drainage plan sufficient for City staff to determine that the drainage pattern of the neighborhood will not be adversely affected by improvements to the property. Planning Commission vote on this recommendation was 5 ayes, 0 nays. Continued Zoalag Fil« .«1107 Moif —bar 19« 1987 Pag* 3 o£ 3 6- 1 • .* ,• ■-.r ’ Staff i^OO - "V ■'% ; y. . *»w » * -♦ ! ' r . __ U; . :T Staff ragonmndi"approval par the Planning Conaiaaloa raconBandation. Hot* that th* oondltiona of tha approval do not place a apacific tlaa frana whan tha inprovanants to tha culvert and driveway area shall taka placa. ^4^.,- Given tha nature or tha ImprovaBants necessary on applicants' side of that staff would suggest that tha drop structure or baffle weir and excavation of a larger storage area be a part of tha building pamlt ^‘^raqniraaants and that no Cartlficate of Occupancy be Issued until those j^t.y.»iPl«ni~iaprovaawnts are completed. This again raises the issue.of whether naichborlng property owners will at that point be forced to expand dollars to share in the cost of those inlet end iaprovamants. I :j^^.^^*ould suggest that discussion between Council, Public Works Director,' City Baginaar and City Legal Consultant ensue prior to Council's final vote on ‘ . this matter. Staff would note to Council that the applicants are in town only for a short period and then will be returning to Nashville, hence if possible they request final action tonight. ftvS. (2f^i-^-r-70Aj -T* • A' /ocrr f>/ C-vrr OF- UFC,A^e-, t *■ ■ « * :------------------- /VO ■Vr .^'V -'iv^ 4P^ r> 4 ‘ .'i: #r^, /Jv; A^«74WSa<e^^ocfc» r.tV” "'*. '-J >» > ^ ^t-. I !:r / *»• ( U.‘ ^ 1- . r' i r i.i i>' i ir i •'. ?r- f «■“' •-*' - • OT.* •« ■ & *7''• %-•* V.r ?4‘-' •<•'•.-Tilr^- • •. ►«• m •I-'. |». "-ri ii*‘.-v . ; UK ■r*<5 V '^*r » •Ju'v: ^ ^•ss;;-;-.:. iir iv =' 6 ,r:;X./),>/V .*• • lOrf^. AsC.^lr >r o4.':v ' •» I . ^ *-* .r.-n~ . V.SU7 Sm:;0-^7. '"0;?O • > 9--^^ ••i ;r>-- i * : ' ri 's'•# • • • * 9i," •• t :.‘>-r.- ■ f •' »-■ •• •. •%» • i- . V^-Kt“=: • : ^ “ * .-« ■. ^* ' •. • 4- \ 4 ^It ., .r* . f Si^wi%,j * • ^ ^ 'i. -/• 'ni.'* .-*r;j T'V r; -- W- •>*;' r^fe .:j-:;t--(C>-:r«' X^^JSma jL\ y ? K i^- -i'-v • • - . ■ *f •• * . ■’r" ^ - > . . . / :7 t.7 .. ;-;v-r:r;-*;y'*':--^. •\A. K V - >* t • *' * • ♦ ' • .f ' ‘ , « • . ■ -r* **v «• ''.'T * . .7W ,*»*•’’ >* * ^ *. <- * ..,«- r> ■• '. - / • •■ • ^ ;\ 'irtl .(l «. '.’v1 ( • • ‘t ,\ t W-'V-W" m. R: ' ' • ' V?’/ •’ I ■' ,1-^1 tt; -i* ^ » r‘ ' .m-i • • .• «Pt!=5*f- >;” 'NMIff ?W/iJ ^;cS■••.'SSSj •®>y, ■# '‘-'Is ••••■■•':*ilrfeir VI > !!'■. ?^.»sC5!r 1.. l^- • • M . • o* 5 )^tA *1 * ■ •V'^» ■ * '>' ill . s vl in»‘! i :^'N ',( • J -. » '’ ‘ * -• '• ^ . • . V ' • *^- • —-V> r:^'*?2b-^v- Ry. -• * V ^ *•' ’ •'^’. * .*"' t'i ■•■.** ^ y*. -■kuc-*> •'i‘** tL —. .' ; » r .. . IA'--»ftwi.l' • : ' •: J ---------->: ~___________________________^; ..rl .•. ____,» ' ► m Bones troo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Otte G Pooen -V Pt joiecn C Anocrt.lL P£ Mjrvn L Sorv#^ P6 P c^.^rt3 E PE Gem R Coc^ ®E Thcfnjt E No>CV *»E Ptjoen G Scnun<rL PE Sown V EDCrtin C**A Engineers & Architects <fth A Gordon PE - c'^a'd W Foitef PE wcnaKJ C SurgansL p£ Jerry A Bourdon P£ Vant A Manujn P£ 'eo < PE *.*c''aei T P£ Pcoert 9 Pfeftfrte PE Dasno O i.ovxxa PE Tryjmis W Peterjon PE Michael C Lynrn P£ James 9 Maiarxj. PE m <ennetn p Aryjenon P£ P Po^i P£ Poocr: C Fuiie*. a ( a Thomas E Angui P£ Hc^vanJ A Sa ^cko PE Danie^ j Eogerton PE a >t2 PE Ph-io J CasA-eJ P£ fimaer Manrea PE Mam O vt^an PE Thomas R Anderson A i A Gary F Ryianoer. PE Viies 3 Jef*sen PE ^ p^-jio Gra^e» t« P£ Ffne C P ur-art A l A A^f^ M R^ A ' C P jerry O Prtwrri ?E Cecso Ov*er P£ RcCe-T R DtC'Cx^ PE Gary A' \Vxe'' ^E Charles a £f<»son Leo M PaMefsky Harlan M Own •7* t:' April 3, 1991 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Re: Charles & Ann Hommeyer Property Variance Application #1631 Our File No. 139-1631 Dear Jeanne: We have reviewed the application for a lot area variance submitted on the Charles and Ann Hommeyer property. The site drainage is the only significant engineering issue. Prior to any construction on the property, a thorough drainage plan should be prepared by a competent engineer and submitted to the City for review. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson SDG:U 139.COF 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 city of ORONO u % • • I CITY OF ORONO ^laLx • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2300. • . 5 ; -•’ A RBSOurrio* grmttiiig A VMUAMCK TO miiwtcipa If zohiho code s»moH * : ■flinsAS Wiili®» Lewis and 475^Linden Avenue follows* ‘ i» ■ I* .4., a 4 Block 3/ Hlnnetonka Summit Park, Hennepin County, iS“n.io« (Sirelnnfter 'tne property-.; and I T • .. >** . • » 4. - ■ ' WBBB»S, the applicant h*\ “PP|it.div°islon‘^ s'^B^'tS p«r«“t^-uhe •Munlclpal^^9 residence on a lot of 0.61 acre where 1.0 ' construction of a resrdence. _______ aero A . ______ ritv Ci7J. ^rBPORH. BH XT PBSOT.VHO hy the City Council of orono. • ' i Minnesotai fimdiugs 1. This application was reviewed as Sonin, Pile .1107 C^nri'lA P(s r- -We „ vrr* *■ "■ .. . ..Residential Zoning District. .^55i:s-7S^S'~ " * 4 dditional land available for purchase to makeA) There is no additions a this a conforming parcel. . V.* a conforming p-*vi^*- B) The lot area is consistent with that of other deve in the neighborhood. r> The variance was - 0, sewer 1. available and has been assessed for a towl previously granted in 1980. *•- • - ^ V. .. 4-;a smgle family r ~ *"» •»* available on the lot to need for further'W-*. - B) Ample area ia av*ii« without the neea i.w* rrr, variancese ^ - ’•mAAe ’ , ti*'' - — *—• - ** • - • • -'m C * ^ *'** ’* ” * -■ • V.**ifrtTAd^ —- 'f 'rx.v ‘‘• i* . .... — ... , • eA;c;':.ir-. varx«inw«z»e ’•we'Ai * tj;*- • - — '• • g ' * # >->• •- ew.» ... e. t. ' _jr, . ‘ , ' ■ # ••.■-. ' , . * ^ ^ • ‘i. r• •T. ta* * *■ *“ • . 4^.., *ee .r > . . .. .. * - • 4,i ••••er •Oevifc e e\ , ^ ‘ • •• • ► .-.4 ..re' *-V ^ . . W * . *• x*/• *• '*• . * * ^*r‘*** r^** *. 4 —. . . ’. .* • - 4-W4 •. _______ is .t i —' •, -f, 'r :• . • • ■ : ., • ->• '.''a W ■;; t e* •• ■ ' ^ 4 > ■ '’4, ■*.' .'l-e'. t • • ••' • •■' • • :n i v''“. •' * Na I ♦ - f ^ P-* • -•----------____________________ —IS*-r; -L-. . ..»r?!TT- ^ — I City of ORONO ______ TV COUNCIL pK f B.SOLUT.ON OfTHEOTYCOUNCL NO._il22.--------- ORON^€ th« prop«>f^y 4 •" Council finds ®Xing and lint for^ihe property. - V$*r“rV ° ,,a.rea this ' ~ Tha City Council 5*tions o£ th® effect of the ptopo .• ; lina ’inV|»\^:rer/w %he . - condition. exi.ti"%rbfht; :rthe c-unity. ^t7i»“‘o'n the heelth, ..‘®‘V « ot^« 6. . The City 5°“?fih“o'*^“"'^,h^t Trotting’‘hi ^ Sf‘oS«’'cTng\ to neTh-r 4r„TcesTT/«%r:.erv. . Itrable the ePP,^"\^,%^^code and ComprehensiverptriHnffhtent of the Zonin, _____ City.n«o MID COMDITIO**^ City ^®“*'fiivi5ion^5 (S' to P®t» where 1-0 acre . ...)... ................ __ ..,... ...»„.enc« «•• - - toxi.v'*”^ - K*clc 35' from the r«i. oubject to th „„otore oho 11 be “Ot bo ‘k .A ra.ldonce otructur north lor i. The PtoPooo-L t«iot line, ond 10ieot, south ond eo.t ^ b • *• • i;. —line. - 10.^^^^^^^^ ^ f S390.00 shall he P 2. pork Pee of «” parcel, such lasuod. ■ ""“ tek P" -■— ••' *f •• •f f • ^ w <• . , - f ^ .4' _ - LX . • a.-'. rfl im. Vk» e*o‘ af » *a»' '•• •' ■ ........ ““ • on-the property ... "4.-'Hardcover all ^ 8,360 Saf. 4.h« westerly -- VoS-l.OOOV) «y^,«. . . aose^ent over th. :i;-;v'H.rdciv.r^.llo«.^^^^ .•£• Eh, «i.t.rijKl«; 500-1.000* ' may not _ ^ easement over the - 4 nts s^ll 9rant .a drainag casement rr :-:A^«a-*^••t:.and »o'^th®r\Y of this resolution, :.r' orior to tili-ng « . - «f ^ PAae 2 ^ r .1 ciTy OF <«u.. •• *TT*i *iil.'^* >r***** • *' . * rI* .'ji-w-.»C'. City of OROINO bksolution of the city council 2300 ______NO. iSil« “‘P?"the dr?v«°y »eTvl»g •*..* •i /rty SoundVt* eL Such inprove.ants EolXo-in,.Eollowln,. culvert inlet up,rede includLn, at^cture -vitf-rt. Cuivci'- *** icture. above the culvert. V)‘ Excevetion of e larger storage ar directly . -dvised to attempt to work^wi expenditures 7. ^PP^f®*”rtrooerty owners in order ° improvements. ^ . huilding permits appii •| • • • e I ‘'.-‘it;'- i « *» 8. Prior to drainage plan ®^^^^e^®neighborhood will not"W.sr/ “.SSiSS." '"iJ’S^ •,iv'“.“°^2>.“" ""St“ drop .tructut. * pl.n end =».ll »« r..;d.nc on-that ?ncluS.d on ,'^h\t ^\Vic” . Occupency for l.,u.nc. of . c««i' V „,«»rty notproperty <-»»^Lt)ropercy. _nSu. ;“u«“Tv«fcSSineil .pprov.l. or tht. 23* 1988). ___ '** ♦■-he. ter»Sr;*®5 council epprovai, o*. , e „on-co.pli.n=. “•udlti°oi;‘oV ’th!'. ««ivtion fauthority ,*^iisaes 1' ‘ ; >'••:• '•♦A .■r»# ••'. •:.*. '•• •-x r *./ r. ionin, cod., anar^ •• « ------ ... * .. • -a- . •rl - ••• •r^.I^ r -•' ^r. m *S-:;.. -- :- - City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. __2300 T -• . ■/V . • *•' vi*. . •i;' vti 1 i987.Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 23rd day of Moveaber, •« * •*. ATTEST* *•“ ■ >• «* • i ;;s Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk •■ i* :>.;•• I*"* •'t‘ ■: •* vt :::... • Property 0%mer(e) \ " • • i. - ^-r fir >•'0* •*# •* •v_ V. • • , S5V,?‘- ■I 1 ’•. •‘*5., -f f •■ •, ?v • • • i« . » ^fr*- •n''* • • • I ; «* i ? ^ I j f >= V . j - \ -r i /'• ii-.-r% *V-r.** "2- V I 1. 0 <■ < .»vV';>T •.. • %0^. . 'jt . i v,v-4^:r vX r4»^r^JU ‘. A" ' .•*.... « u ^ •■*'• . - *_____. . •. ' .s -»*• * ♦ < ■* t*" * % . . • . •»• >«• ..k.«^ -•••>'a> -• * A •«• • «.• ^ r.' . V .' • .. --r .i:? ♦« •«- V. •. . . •• • » *V .. *.••••• • •V* > * ? *..* •.•<"•• .n' iw.:m ■ • * ; • • • 'f • Page 4 of S ^ , _ ____ , • •-» ••*. ,f^m.’ . • —————————M— •—1 -• *#iU<i»'»i W*-•* '* I * A ^ “Y -.-■ ^.%4ev?%er *-•«-• ^ • »v« • . • • V *' • *r .. .^ " .-w* --r . •‘i. .P - »* • • ^ .. ‘ • .'tA 14.x. «r * I . To;Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson 3 From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject; April 10, 1991 #1632 Steven Martin, 3890 Shoreline Drive Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.25, Subdivision 4 (A) - Conditional use permit required for duplex unit. Property is served with sanitary sewer, lot is adjacent to commercial district, duplex is proposed within 200' of commercial zone. Total Area = 34,950 s.f. Actual Area = 30,000 s.f. (exclusive of right-of-way of County Rd 15 - 33' width = 4,950 s.f.) Approx. Dry Buildable Area = 21,000+ s.f. (approx. 9,000 s.f. of wet lands to be dedicated) Allowed Hardcover Based on 30,000 s.f. = 7,500 s.f. or 25% Proposed = 5,312 s.f. or 17.7%* Note site plan is not to scale. Staff has asked Mr. Martin to submit an updated revised plan to scale confirming actual setbacks and dimensions of structure. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E * Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit II Exhibit I Exhibit Jl Exhibit K Exhibit L Application Plat Map Property Owners List • Hardcover Fact Sheet Topographic Map • Staff Sketch ■ Elevation ■ City Engineer's Letter ■ Storm Sewer Plan/County Road 15 ■2 - Approval of Original Conditional Use Permit Plus Sketch ’ Council Minutes of 7/10/79 Site Plan - Not to Scale - -i ii mtfiifr'inM ifii H’' -y E' • V- Jl-i. K - \f- r Zoning File #1632 April 9, 1991 Page 2 of 3 Review of Application -■ The original conditional use permit for duplex use was approved in 1979. Since that time a storm sewer improvement was approved and installed at the time of the County Road 15 upgrade (review Exhibit I). The City Engineer comments that drainage on the Itj was provided for with the County Road 15 improvements and is adequate up to a 10 year storm. Gustafson recommends that the flooi’ elevation shown at 934' be raised 1' to 935' for gi*0ater flood protection. As in the earlier review^ the City will take Conservation and Flowage Easements over the wetlands and drainageways along west. As already noted above, the standards for the duplex use are satisfied by the proposal. Staff's only reservation is that we cannot confirm actual setbacks based on the information submitted for this current review, because the site plan is not drawn to scale. Hardcover should not be a problem as the property is allowed 7,500 s.f. total hardcover. The plan has been submitted to the City of Spring Park for comment. As the applicant is not filling flood plain areas, etc., it is not clear why the City Engineer asks for DNR review. Staff will have confirmation at your meeting. At the time of the 1979 review, the County approved access to the site from the private roadway subject to the City posting "No Parking" signs. Access to the site must be approved by the City of Orono. The property has already been assessed one sewer and one water unit. Based on the duplex use, the applicant will be required to make payment for an additional sewer and water unit. Based on the 1991 fee schedule, a water unit is $1,764.53 and a sewer unit is $3,519.09. Two SAC units will oe paid at the time of the Issuance of a building permit. Each unit of the duplex will be served by separate independant utility lir.as. Options of Action - Table. To table if applicant is unable to submit an amended site plan drawn to scale. Approval. To approve the conditional use permit for Steven Martin for a duplex use for the property located at 3890 Shoreline Drive confirming that the 30' t,treet setback has been met from both street lot lines. Approval is subject to the following conditions; iiMiaalkAi Zoning File #1632 April 9, 1991 Page 3 of 3 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, applicant's surveyor shall meet with the City staff on the property to determine extent of wetland area on property so that final survey can designate wetlands on survey and drainageway along west side of property. 2. Applicant to execute drainage easement over wetlands and drainageway on property to be submitted upon application for a building permit, fully executed and in a form acceptable for filing. 3. City Engineer to review drainage plans submitted with building permit application. Such plans to shown ditch locations, swales, drainage pattern, and building elevation (first floor elevation at 935'). tv ^ •''•r 4. Approval by the Public Works Department for access onto to County driveway. 5. Applicant to provide soil boring information in order to determine the suitability of soils for building foundation. 6. Payment of two SAC fees and one sewer and one water unit at the time of building permit application. Based on 1991 schedule, water unit ct $1,764.53, sewer at $3,519.09. Staff shall contact the City of Spring Park to see if they have any concerns related to this application and report to you at your meeting. In addition, staff will contact the City Engineer's office to determine t-he need for input from the DNR. r I -II 'U 1 Bflsc: i fi, j: .1.,CITY OF ORCNO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION _ MM MM M* MM MM MM MM MM MM MM • *^3 >A£. t>*' Q ^‘'V* / /1 •> ?- • • PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address _____OJv.m^ ^Ky^ 5SZ‘={ I *% u K Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)n- II1 - i-b -'ho- co<p4 Please attach legal description on required survey. to application if not included APPLICANT Name A>iActkJ Phone (hone) Phone (work) I Address 3'4(fS Co /^d t/V_________City M^ix’oA zip -53'5di/ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _/4l5 Address Phone (home) Phone _ _ _ _ City _ _ _ 7 ^ ^tj ^ ^ Date Propert^Acquired -ri ^- - v*»w..ww ^ I (do) a^on^ also own the adjacent _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _— ^ I f w'» •.••\wr*U 4/o^ I ‘^o (month/year) PEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee ter-the-Fact Fee - Double Current rtppj-ication Fee r j./tVViuC i.*rr urr r • ,' wt» V' JL lytM 1 *1 f ;■ » I A.' ■ VV 'V iVUl iUij’A/m 5 50.00 For each variance request with CUP , $125.00 Residential accessory Use $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments ;Vl • r,' tUM m •» MM .,!/•?-;of $150.00puplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling " 101 cu. yd. or more v-eKrtr-o Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Ease-.ent Vacation With Subdivision Rezonrng (PUD - refer to fee sc.hedule) Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT OSS OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Ccner (soecify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in d^ail:^ JluUiC^jU^ 'ly'y !h,. f 'y~^L /T^j -hrx/i ------------------------------------------------------- 2. EtSQOIRSD SUBMITTALS '• cerllfl^d "iioutr'; "own«s List of owners within 350’ (you oan obtain this list from Hei.nepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). , , Topographic survey (existing and prcaposed contours) if xand alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (sea staff for requirenen.s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate -...s>- or any other persons you wish notified of this application. 3. 4. 5. 5. 7. YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR_ A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17« OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. ?»e4lv the?Vur" appfilft/on'T^noroompl'efe tL"Lw”inf°o™ation* h“ not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date- - - - - - - - - APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE . j - rhe applicant hereby agrees to provide all information lequired or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (sta - time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred Ln review of this application, and certifies that the information suppxi Ls true and correct to the ^est gj^his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date /. OWNERS STGNATORE . , ,,The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and C^’^uTclY puT^=“LTVf investigation and verif/catioAyd£J:his request. ^ y Uner-s si,n«ure _ _ Date _^2±m Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on t third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If unable to attend a scheduled meeti.ng, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building s Zo g Office of this change prior to the meeting. 1. F 'O \U: RUN DATE 03/19/91 BATCH 008 i J HENNEPIN COUNT/ PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWERS LIST ‘ PROP AODR ONT^R NAME TAXPAYER NA»«/ADDR 17 17-117-23 33 0037 03900 SHORELINE OR ROY M STEVEr^S AUDREY L JORGENSEN 3900 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK MN 55364 t « PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 17 17-117-23 33 0040 03932 SHORELINE DR B C D0»8«Y ft B A DOI^^Y BENNETT C D09*tJEY 2665 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 X I •» PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TA)0’AYER NAME/ADDR 17 17-117-23 33 0045 03918 DEL OTERO AVE R KRAEMER ft L KRAEMER R K ft L M KRAEMER 3910 DEL OTERO AVE SPRING PARK m 55364 38 17-117-23 33 0002 PROP ADDR 03880 SHORELINE DR ‘ •ONNER NAME CO OF hErtI TAXPAYER HENN CO PUBLIC SERVICE NAIC/AODR BUILDINGS A 6R0UN0S-H0PKINS t 1 '.t ‘ « ORONO HAINT STATION *. i- y L*' \ 4 t 38 17-117-23 33 0005 (i *..PROP ADDR 03860 SHORELINE DR^ % ?•ONNER NAME DAVID UMBEHOCKER r TAXPAYER DAVID UMBEHOCKER NAME/ADDR 3860 SHORELINE DR HAYZATA MN 55391 (‘ PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR ■t ■ ( S8 20-117-23 22 0001 03925 SHORELlIt DR 'H 0 KAMINSKI LEONARD F LAMBERT 3925 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK »9< 55384 M T ■ • \ ■ I * 17 17-117-23 33 0038! 03916 SHORELINE DR DOUGLAS C GA^«LE DOUGLAS C GAMBLE 3916 SHORELINE DR f; SPRING PARK m 55384 r 17 17-117-23 33 0043 03900 DEL OTERO AVE J H BABATZ ETAL JOHN HENRY BABATZ 3900 DEL OTERO AVE H SPRING PARK m 55384 17 17-117-23 33 0046 03/26 DEL OTERO AVE I E BERGSAGEL ET AL TRUSTEES CATHY JO TURNER 2820 HALSTEAD LA . MOUND m 55364 h' f 38 17-117-23 33 0003« 03690 SHORELINE OR ‘ COUNTY OF HENNEPIN HENN CO PUBLIC SERVICE BLOGS ft GROUr^DS HOPKINS ORONO STATION SNAMP y f 38 17-117-23 33 00061 03850 SHORELINE DR ' S KATAINEN ft B L KATAINEN STEPHEN KATAINEN 871 PAYNE AVE • ST PAUL MN 55101 38 20-117-23 22 0002P’ 03935 SHORELINE DR J ft S BEDELL JAMES DAVID BEDELL 3935 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK m 55384 I REPORT NO. PI4S5401 • t 4^it ■ PAGE. . U i • 5- 17 17-117-25 55 0059 05924 SHORELINE DR CLARK R OLTMAN CLARK R OLTMAN 5924 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK FM 55564 I f 17 17-117-25 55 0044 05910 DEL OTERO AVE JERRY 0 MOORE ET AL JERRY 0 MOORE 5910 DEL OTERO AVE SPRING PARK 55564 17 17-ll/-:3 33 0047 03934 DEL OTERO AVE H 6 0 KOKESCH JR HAROLD R KOKESCH JR 3934 DEL OTERO AVE SPRING PARK HN 55384 38 17-117-23 33 0004 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO STEVEN C MARTIN STEVEN C MARTIN 3485 COUNTY RD 44 MOUND MN 55364 58 20-117-23 21 0018 ^2420 OUrtlOOOY AVE CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH 2420 DUNHOODY AVE HAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 22 0003 03905 SHORELINE DR 0 C FILKINS ft E 6 FILKINS DOUGLAS ft ELIZABETH FILKINS 3905 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK MN 55384 * ^ r i s #1 .1 * I ■ I I I • %• *. i j 4 4 < •.V I « •‘J 1 i‘5 .»' ♦ I t 4 ; . I 4 t . . A . * • • *• t .* ■ r• i V; I '4 4 « * I ’ ’ ‘ J' ' ^ • u a RUN DATE 05/19/9X M ‘‘It V HENKEPIN BATCH 008 PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR > PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAT^/AODR PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR • f ■f •'I •i; IR 38 20-117-23 22 0004 03895 SHORELINE DR R D JENSEN ETAL J A S RAUSCHENDORFER 3895 SHORELINE DR NAYZATA MN 55391 V ■ ; t i i: } S 36 20-117-23 22 0007 03865 SHORELINE DR KATHERINE HC NAMARA LOUIS D OBERHAUSER 2425 DUNHOOOY AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 ‘ ii t« I.. .1/' 38 20-117-23 22 0010 02435 DUrtCOOY AVE 0 H KITCHAR ETAL H/L EST OLGA KITCHAR 2435 : NNOOOY AVE HAYZAU MN 55391 ?« ! . • f f ■ i I • i .•f V “if t : ! * ► I * A A COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWERS LIST tr 38 20-117-23 22 0005 |l* 03915 SHORELINE DR « MINN DEPT OF REVENUE * NH SASKATCHEWAN ACQUISITIONS 7740 NORTH CT EDINA MN 55435 38 20-117-23 22 0008 y 02405 DUtMOODY AVE L 3 K OBERHAUSER LOUIS A KATHLEEN OBERHAUSER 2425 DUNWOOOV AVE c NAYZATA MN 55391 30 20-117-23 22 0012 » i-02437 OUNWOODY AVE NORMAN C DEISE ETAL NORMAN C 3 MARION 0 BEISE 2437 DUNWOODY AVE HAYZATA MN 55391 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE , 17 38 20-117-23 22 0006 03877 SHORELINE DR L B OBERHAUSER ETAL L B OBERHAUSER 2425 DUrMXDDY AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 i •• i < ' If. 4 M' 58 20-117-23 22 0009 02425 OU»OOOV AVE LOUIS B OBERHAUSER A HIFE LOUIS B OBERHAUSER 2425 DUNHOOOY AVE V V ' HAYZATA m 55391 hi’-- I i’ 1! I V : ^ y * r TOTAL BATCH 006 00026 V' \4 ‘ tS f I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE tECCRDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE \ J . t ‘ I • * 1 i \, . » \ \ . ' 1% ;<1 \ • i * 1 ■• • V .i •I••. ! V • )fu \ *’ » iX ,v 8 V V*.. 1%^ ■t > ‘ ^ \ ’ f i: ‘ ' • • f • ^ - . it-.' i J .1 4s v,-^r- % W % :■ • HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSH cili SETBACK zcne : (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' 5cO-10CO' Existing Hardcover A. House / ^»'44-2 LENGTH 6 ' ^l2lA 0^^ ■ V 3« Garage c. Driveway \o 7b D. Sidewalk A A . -.*» ; V £, Patio / Deck F.Landscape areas UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING 6. Other X X X - X — X WIDTH "7 2- c-n & 2V- 2^ lACL . '? d o o S. r«- V. S • F •.A S. F •-N I \ S.F J 3. F •7n '-arW S I r ^ I S.F. 7-c? » ' S.F. xs' /-So '' !^ a:<7s ^ S.F. S.F S.F S.F S.F. S.F- S.F. S.F. Total Hardcover in lone - 15"^ X 2-3^ Total Property Area in Zone X100 3^3/9 S.E. (1 /7.7 li/^5£_s.E. HI, 3^3-7 4 B //.i •% llrfaifevi m '•■ **'.- . .^C- ■■• ; !» . V- V •: ■':j t . /■ .*■ ■*■ ■ ■ ’■''•C^'’. * '•' ■: ■ ■''.■■ ■ •' '■ ' ■ ■- . • *■* ■ '''■!■ . . *. ’: . ; ..*.■ • :• • • --"w'■. •;.•• ■;': , ■ - V hri ?D O H W W >Hi l-H O •‘ -’t:* • i V CD DA Hja/ Ml • - ♦ (T^ I " rO Y tin ill*r / / • Mi wl; Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Cno G 3cr-<:-cc *»E 'J/ RoifTf. -»osfft3h C AnderU, PE M4fvr» L Scr^a'j PE £ TiifrKT', PE 0>trin P Ccxjk. PE T'-.OfT'JS E Now. PE POCff? G Scniir<nr. PE SoSJn M EDef!<n. C PA Engineers & Architects V*' ^ PE - i-a-d ‘.V Pcttr. PS Zcnaa C SurgvOL PB A 3corocn PE Va'< * “‘4nsc.'T PE >3 < - ^0. P£ V<r3^ T Pjutmonn P£ PCCf'T P P^frtf PE r ..d O U3Si«c?a. PE. T»'on'^$ PVfffson. PE V<r.j« C L>nch. PE Jan-tt R Maiand. PE ^ *r::cfion PE Ma.ric P Cc-'i. PE itooefT C Ruiieit. A i a *h3?ras £ *rcui PE ^ Sa-"*t..i PS J Ecg^ncn. PE \Urk A Se-0. PE P^i»o J C.Uv\ef PE ismaei .Mar-r'ez. PE Mark D Wd^ -i. PS Thomai S Anocrwn. A I.A Gary P R> anoef. PB 3 -^^r'se^ PE L P*r..^o G/aw PS Rene C PHjr,’'art. A l A. ■*-.;res */ ?r:j. A / C P ->rp* C -ftzich PE CK'tc C V er PE Rooen R DflPdow PB Gary w Mo‘ en PE Chaw A £'<kscn Leo M **a/-rtsky Ha^ian M 0«Son t April 3, 1991 City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Cr^'stal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabu.sth r Re: Steven Martin Duplex General Land Use Application #1632 Our File No. 139-1632 Dear Jeanne: We have reviewed the plan for the proposed duplex on the Steven Martin property. Tlie drainage and access to the site are the significant engineering issues. We recommend that the floor elevation of 934.0 shown on the plan be raised one foot to 935.0. This change is desirable so that a suitable driveway access can be attained and additional flood protection can be provided, as there is no immediate overflow. The drainage on the site was provided for with Hennepin County ’s C.S.A.H. 15 improvement project, and is adequate for up to a 10 year stoim We recommend that a thorough soil boring exploration program be implemented prior to any construction to analyze the suitability of the soils for a building foundation. Easements should be granted to the City over all wetland areas. The plan should be submitted to the DNR for review and approval. The City of Spring Park should be contacted to review the ap,. jcation. If you have any questions, please contact this ofiice. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ?. Shawn D. Gustafson SDG:li i.‘^9.cor 2?35 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota SSI13 • 612-636-4600 30 V. llin fCB\w • / .s;:i tn NT A. cnr> * 2W R .• 0J ^K •r ^ ♦ tf '‘'ovs::^ ^269/ i ' •■■r.-;,-. -.iW \ 84*13'53.9* V. A * : - $ >■■ ■••• |r^.t ' . . « • V . i • • yr^ ' Vr t* v .'i •t*rr . *\ .' t:: r i i • . i i • • t ■ ■ • •• Mtphonv 4' •» '• 0$y^t ‘ ..#-t. A . . • » V ' ’ > *« • c':' CITY of ORON PcMt Oflte* Bm M*Ot)raUl'Bc]r, •• '• ■ m . ^ .»^ • . * On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka * • * MKMMwiicipaJ O * % j* \ \« ‘r- % • July 12, 1979 *.« •.•4 • /» * 'If • • Oim .* y:.. •■ < » Mr« Warrm Ortenblad 4527 Shorallne Drlva Spring Park, Minnaaota 55384 . * , . Re: 4452 Conditional U«e Permit - Duplex a- : DMr tfc. OrtmbUd! On July 10, 1979, the City Council approved your conditional uae permit application for construction of a residential duplex per the attached site plan (based on 1-4-79 survey) subject to the following: * ^i - • » . 1. Planning Comolsslon recomnendatlon that you grant a; .»• flowage and conservation easement to the City over the ^ wetlands. Please complete in duplicate the attached easement adding a legal description of the drainage ditches and wetland areas marked In red on the site plan. Retam easemeht forms with permit application, or earlier If you so desire. 2. Actual site drainage to be subject to staff Japprofal,with permit Issuance. Show ditch locations,' swales,'drainage'patcer~ building elevation on permit application site plan. • m ^ » a 3. Access location to be subject to Hennepin County permit City favors and will try to persuade County to allow aocaas only from existing County driveway. 4. Setback and hardcover variances are not permltced (and were not requested). Sincerely. P. Olson Village Planner AP0:kh Plat of Survey for W.A.O. Cootraotora, Inc. In Govemnant Lot 0, Section 17-117-23 -A • ^ - ^52 k/ ^ X ir*" • »..-v 4rPAAU)T Mc iVtTCAAJ^ (fArTAliS ^ S(/4Cft(/SMCi) * u•%••’.*• ' I V i <• ^ . •• . m ^ ';v ^>v. i.=• * ,1, 9 ljw^k kiAie; otrc^ to fS^ •s V. I*' f . ... f--.-T-/*' . ^; ■ ^ VI% f9 a ^ \ % • • • t .1^ ^ ; ..V •• • .I -- Carilflrata of 3xix-v«y: . ^ I hurol*/ cartlf/ that thin If u, Iruo and coi rwct ropi^ofriLatlon of n furvey of tho bouniarias of tho South 233 f«iit of Uio tiO feat of Uvit p«rt of Oovemawnt Sot 2 iyini^ onet of Stroiitur'a Spring hirv., Section 17, Township 117 North, nariice 23 west of U)m l.th Principe! h-jrlulan, except that oort thtreof l/lnr South of U»o ^o^t.^ rit^ht^of —way lino of County noud Ko* !2^a It doec rni purport to ahow improvt*»i«r.t:i or uncroucnaunta• Srril- Lr. to o l« S iO» Ir^fi nvir'ter .1* •- ______ It____^ a — 1*1 "la. 6064 Alvin h. tteiioer liege No.l32V> ey^inu Surveyor• ar.d fiunnora «^xu. Hlnn»);.ota oJi/^ I iMnJrv’rW i-.:- ■ . . ■A4 - 7 .- i. • .-»■ • IP • ... »■« • ■• •(? •,* X' !oi, •t * • 4 . C‘ f * 'i* V' ; r ‘ REGULAR ISBE7XMG OP 7QE OROtlO COUtlCXL, JULY 10, 1979 .. • . *1* Planning Coanistion Meeting - Juno 11, 1979 Planning CooBaiaaion adviaed Hr. Ortenblad that the duplex would be for reaidential uae only, nie pxopoaed atructure neeta all of the aetback require^ nenta of;the diatricL. The aeptlc inspector will staka the wetlands for the applicant who is not faadlar with nethod used to dotemine wetlands ' boundary. Planning CoBnaission oaked staff to once again review question of access from County Road #15 with the Hennepin County Highway Department. Planning Conmisaion moved to approve the conditional uae application of Warren Ortenblad for the purpose of construction of a duplex subject to the following conditions t 1. Applicant enter into a Conservation and Plowage Basement agreement with the City. 2. Access to be resolved by staff, applicant, and Hennepin County Highway Department. 3. Local drainageway to be reviewed with applicant by the staff upon issuance of building permit. Council Meeting - July 10, 1979 Massengale moved, Hurr seconded, to approve the conditional use permit request of Warren Ortenblad for 3870 Shoreline Drive, per the Planning Commission recommendations of June 11, 1979. Motion, Ayes (3) - Hays (0). Page 9 CONDITIORAL USE 3870 Shoreline : (Continued) * * ■ Hr. Alan Olson, City Planner, entered into the record the reqiiest of Kem Hoppe, 950 Sixth Avenue Horth, for a subdivision, dated March 2, 1979, which statesi SOBDIVXSZOH 950 Sixth Avenue #464 Kem Hoppe Zoning District RR-IB - Mr. Hoppe proposes dividing 20'i' acres into five lots. Lot 1 contains the original house and appears to have no setback problems. All lota moot the requirements of the toning district. , ...IP., .a* The applicant must obtain a now access permit from . . the County Highway Department. Planning Commission Meeting — March 12, 1979 Planning Commission gave conceptual approval to the proposed five lot subdivision of Kem Hoppe. He was advised that an entrance pemit from the County Highway Department will bo required. iihttU (Continued) To;Mayor Peterson & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Frc»i: Date: Jeanne A. Mabusthf Building 6 Zoning Administrator April 10, 1991 Subject: #1633 Andrew McDermott, 2701 Walters Port Lane Variance ~ Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) - Rear setback variance. Required “ 30* Existing Principal Structure =» 11'* Existing Deck = 8'* Proposed 3-Season Porch =• 8' Bath Addition = 10' Proposed Variances: 3-Season Porch = 22' or 73% Bath Addition * 20' or 66% *1 Permit #2334, issued 12/13/69 for new construction. The property was zoned R—1C. Rear yard setback = 30' (review Exhibits Ll-2). Permit #5170, issued 11/4/83. No record as to inspector's approval at 8' setback. If this was determined to be a grade level deck, it could be allowed as close as 2' from any lot line. If the lot line was determined to be a side lot line, a 10' setback would have been required. Record of Hardcover - 0-75' Setback Area » 750 s.f. No Hardcover 75-250' Setback Area = 5,675 s.f. Existing Hardcover ■ 1,925.3 s.f. or 33.9% (no change proposed) 250-500' Setback Area = 12,918 s.f. Allowed Hardcover = 3,875.4 s.f. or 30% Existing Hardcover = 2,480.49 s.f. or 19.2% Proposed Hardcover = 2,552 s.f. or 19.7%* * 237.5 s.f. of landscape area underlain with plastic ;^o be removed and replaced with deck/3-season porch/bath addition structures. No variance required within 250—500 ’ setback area. Applicant proposes no additional removals. I Zoning File #1633 April 10, 1991 Page 2 of 3 List of Exhibits j. !• ># Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit Dl-4 - Hardcover Fact Sheet & Plan Exhibit E - Survey Exhibit F - Proposed Site Plan Exhibit G - Location Map Exhibit H - Deck Framing Plan Exhibit I - Floor Plan Exhibit J - East Elevation Exhibit K - Cross Section Exhibit Ll-2 -- Zoning Code Effective in 19C8 & Zoning Map Review of Application - ! Please review applicant's application form that reviews the roposed improvement project in detail. Briefly, the _mprovements involve construction of a 12'xl3' wide 3-season porch over existing rear deck and the connecting of an existing side deck with the 3-season porch via a 6' wide deck/walk-way. Applicant also wishes to expand an existing bathroom with a 7'x85i' addition also located to the rear or east side of structure (review Exhibit F). The addition is located to the immediate south of the 3-season porch. Staff has enclosed the pertinent zoning code section and map for the zoning at the time the building permit was issued for the residence structure. The 35' front yard setback is met. It is questionable whether this lot could have been considered a corner lot at the time the property was developed, as Pence Lane did not exist in 1968, only a private driveway to serve a single residence. The house was placed 11' from the rear lot line instead of 30'. The side yard setback would have been 10'. As for the 8' setback for the deck constructed in 1984, staff can only assume that the inspector considered this a walkout and the deck considered a grade level deck allowing lot line. Staff now classifies all decks with railings as part of the principal structure requiring principal structure setbacks. Now that the structure is to be converted into a 3-season porch, it becomes part of the principal structure requiring a rear yard setback of 30'. The application does not require hardcover variances within the 250-500' setback area, but excessive amounts of hardcover exist within the 75-250' setback area. 316.5 s.f or 5,57% of hardcover within 75-250' zone is landscape area under:ein with plastic. -■ ■: - v' ‘ lv>^v Zoning File #1633 April 10, 1991 Page 3 of 3 Options of Action - Denial. Please refer to the necessary findings in your zoning code? or Approval. To approve the setback variance of Andrew McDermott for the property located at 2702 Walters Port Lane based on the hardships cited by applicant, as follows; 1. Unusual shape of the property, current floor plan of residence (applicant to provide floor plans of structure at Planning Commission meeting), and location of house on lot. Please review A-2. Applicant has made comments pertaining to an original subdivision of the properties by Michael Pluhm. As the subdivision referred to involved a lot line rearrangement. The staff person who was responsible for that review, there was never any land to be acquired by the property owner at 2702 Walters Port Lane. If this was true, this property would have been part of the lot line rearrangement application. It is "true that Mr. Pluhm did purchase 2702 Walters Port Lane subdivision was complete. The property does gain the benefit of all the open space area. Remember, Mr. Pluhm was allowed to do certain improvements to his existing residence based on his not being allowed to develop portions further away from the lake as an attempt to compensate for the additional hardcover within 75-250' setback area. If there were such deeds to be passed between property owners, it would have required subdivision approval by the City. We have no such record of a subdivision involving the Pluhm property with the property at 2702 Walters Port Lane. The following conditions may be considered with approval of the application; 1. Applicant should be placed on notice that there will be no further encroachment on the east rear yard for future expansion of the principal structure. 2. Planning Commission may ask applicant to consider the removal of excessive amounts of hardcover within 75-250 setback area. What is the opinion of Planning Commission Members (316.5 s.f. or 5.57% hardcover is landscape area)? I CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renevfal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee *>4 ■w'. f *. t I Yr YFPROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ViPqa .'T i-s. m Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 1 l~l • *r*• W »•»-#. »f !- u: • -*►— I.- r.* Wiw vw cull i c »rsf i i Attach legal description to application if not included on '-vir”'?-OV wirVi .<(/i required sur'^^y.,;.7 APPLICANT Name Phone (home) HI 5 __ ^uipg-gy^ KA^r)F12-MOTT' Phone (wor)c) 12^b~bSC>_ Addraaailnnl WAu^TlLiTJb ToftjCity: Orui :)------ Zips_^S3_3j II OWNER (if different than applicant) Name m f5_ _ __ Phone (home) Phone (wor)c) Address:City:Zip: fV,- Date Property Acquired f ^9>-\_ (month/year) ■■ :r*i I (do) (MT^no^alao own the adjacent parcels of land present cse of property Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Si L. Pi^i f Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $IE'ood.oo Construct a 12' X 13' wide three season porch on top of the existing 12' X 12'-6"wide rear deck. Construct a small deck on the north side of the pLch and connect it to the existing side deck with a 6' wide deck walkway^ Also included as part of the work is a 7' X 8'-6" wide addition master bathroom. This will then accommodate a bathtxib and a ou e . . which will convert this bathroom to a full bath. This addition will be atcached to the south side of the three season porch and the east wall of the house. VARIANCES REQUIRED ,1 rf Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side X Rear) Other 11 HARDSHIP Due to the unusual shape of the property, the current floor plan of the residence and its existing location on the lot, this is the only feasible way an addition can be constructed. DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS The existing 12' X 12'-6" long deck which has been their since 1984, is 8 feet from the property line. This deck replaced a considerably larger deck which ran along the entire length of the residence approximately 13 feet wide by 45 feet long. The building foundation, built approximately 1968 at its closest point is 11 feet from the property line. At no point will the three season porch be any closer to the property line then the existing deck is. The bathroom addition will be further away from the property line than the existing deck is at its closest point. The existing property between my east property line and Pence Lane (driveway) was determined unbuildable by the planning commission in the early eighties. The only buildable lot, for a family member only, is to the east of PENCE Lane, because of this decision there will always be a large buffer of greenspace between my residence and any future construction. I am also under the impression that another part of the agreement between the city and the former property owner was that when he was allowed to remodel 2702 Walters Port, he was to deed a portion of this green space, which he also owned at chat time to this lot. This lot would then comply with your current zoning regulations, unfortunately to the best of my knowledge, this was never done. *1 4' vKh•4 jk* • tV 1# ^ . k A ^ M k ^-1 • \ ft 2. v^3. >^4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8>i"xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed ele/ations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8i«"xll''). Slcetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8h"xll"). As an addendum to this applicationr please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 7, A, The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLIGAST'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all Information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct/to^the^best pf his/her Jcnowledge - J'z'.• // Applicant’s Signature /// ^'Date OMHERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ac)cowledges and agree?* to this application and further authorizes reasonable entr^ onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members,. an^^Coun'cil members for purposes of investiga tion and verification o£'%iiis/requeat. Owner's Signature Date hj-Lch I I /Applicant must have all ^ubmittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Cosnission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, ple&^«*c make irrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to t\dvis«. the Building 4 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 2m A •.* • 77'J . * I • 4 . t .>•/X * \ k*4 I 1 * • i t t fT *J . !1 <8 V’ !It* ; ** . »■ V f RUN DATC OS/19/91 tU ■» * • ft 9 • * A •V.■■ 1;'|-• V BATCH 004 !. ! •ft • HEttCPIN COUKTY PROPERTY IMfORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST i PROP ADDR • OMCR NAME 'TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR ih ■ ■| S8 ei-117-23 Zl 002S 02745 KELLY AVE RAJ STEHART RONALD C A JEAN C STEHART 2745 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR m 55331 « • V • \ \ i- I PROP ADDR ' ONKER KAHE j TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR . i«■ ; ’ I • A* i . X PROP AOOR OMCR N^NE TAXPAYER . NAHE/ADDR 30 21-117-23 23 0034 02710 KELLY AVE LEE R NUEKELHITZ LEE R MUNKELHXTZ 2710 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR m 55331 * ^ I ■Ji i ’ < * \ 3a 21-1X7-23 23 0041 02499 KELLY AVE OIL UPHOFF DARYL L « LUCY S UPHOFF 2699 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR HN 55331 I, • i . A I > PROP ADOR \ CMCR NAHE V ^TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 21-117-23 23 0046 i: 02710 PENCE LA ■ t . > DEAN E TERRY DEAN E TERRY 2710 PENCE inm . p » i / EXCELSIOR HN V f. f . T* !•• Vli V S’' PROP ADDR i.;,- r f. ^ ^ ^ n ai A AACf ' < < '' . I I •. « V. ' 5. 55331 / - i: 5 '0»t<ER NAHE I -TAXPAYER TOTAL 0ATCH *n' 004 00012 ■■■■ •f. T‘ ‘ , f! t ^ 'I r , 38 21-117-23 23 0029 02701 PENCE LA H A ARBISI A S J ARBISI MICHAEL A A SUSAN J ARBISI 2701 PENCE LA EXCELSIOR HN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0039 02702 HALTERS PORT LA A J MCDERMOrr III ET AL ANDREH J MCDERMOTT III AND JEROME L SKIFTER 2702 HALTERS PORT LA EXCELSIOR HN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0042 02703 HALTERS PORT LA HILLIAM H REESE JR A NIFE HILLIAH H REESE JR 2703 HALTERS PORT LANE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 I 38 21-117-23 23 0047 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED A J MCDERMOTT III ET AL ANDREH J HCOERMOTT III AND JEROME L SKIFTER 2702 HALTERS PORT LA EXCELSIOR )t4 55331 W T It I • I •I I V* I I i: REPORT NO. PI4S5401 PAGE 13 38 21-117-23 23 0033 02700 KELLY AVE R 8 RICE ADD RICE RICHARD 8 A DEBORAH D RICE 2700 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0040 02701 KELLY AVE C E GARRITV A A GARRITY CHARLES E GARRITY 2701 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR m 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0043 02705 HALTERS PORT LA DONALD H NELSON ETAL DONALD H NELSON 18305 Hirt^ETONKA BLVD STE A HAYZATA HN 55391 38 21-117-23 23 0051 02710 PENCE LA DEAN E TERRY DEAN E TERRY 2710 PENCE LANE EXCELSIOR m 55331 u. • V ’ • !; - ■•1- t f » V • I» V ■'J . » 8 4 ‘ Ul I < ‘ \ A- . A. t* I I I « CO I. T 1 ! f Ii ♦ i( .ii w t I: H f\ > t V; i * !:i r ♦ ’ i. • /I ^ mJN DATE OS/19/tl : ! ■ :i,BATCM'006 ' ■ .’•.• '! : ill'j••:;,■ S' i;: HENNEPIN COltITY PROPERTY INFORHATTQN SYSTEM PROPERTY 0I«4ERS LIST sr- •• 1 . It » ; . • / ■ . . 11- ■ I ; ' » » T-. < . ■ ’ - • :? i. '• • ! L ■ . 'i ■ !I--:: i ;,i E r. i..| i i; ;-' . .;• " • i ■ V^ . 'f • I* ' *>f.:: I i' * i p-. ■••21/ •. ; ^ ♦ r *• . r ' * V . • i' j * ’ /. * ' fu f t ]» ■t' 4 ,1 I » ^ I' T I » ’ V ' . . 1: • - * \ A \ 1 i u •• 4 ; . L i t ilii- .•11jk * I ‘ - A ' * 1'-! ■ ’ • •K*‘ , '■ t'.' ■; ' V- • ,v. V i ■'liH I , r- ’> ’<• -'J : » L /»! .* I ij '* - • S‘; ■ "■ ! I [•■ Jl. ’■: / . ■ I6-’ ‘ •% ; I - r * » * f ^ \ ■ ‘I h t I .•fl jj I. i.j-. • .1 < k •* i *( I ii , f ;T*. f. s * i REPORT NO. PI955401 r PAGE 14 M W \ il' ♦ r* I ‘I* # •• •• r: > V 1. tt I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRl« REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OEPARTWNT OF PROPERTY TAXATIOti> TO THE BEST •0. ™ K».UP« ». T gjjj^ DATE^9Q[(^^I by H \ • <# i I ■ I' j ■;[ ■ * i ‘ 4 • f ■ i-niiaftM 'ifil ii f ‘ ri \ « I i 1; !;i i.t : > .1 } 1 ■ t . i u f' I • i' !» r i ■ fr ' 'Xno^ W^wTEes HARDCOVER CALCULATION W0RKSHEg__^^ ,£T3Ac:< ZONE: (circle one ) 0-75' (^5-250y250-5CG' 500-1CC0' E xisting Hardcover in Zone A. House LENGTH ,\d,— X I o 3, Garage c. D riveways l.s aM ?'9 Y1 lO X D. Sidewalk i^S E. Patio/ Deck m/^ ■ X p.Landscape areas underlain BY PLASTIC SHEETING 13_ _ X 3 3T X 31.0 I G. Other - X Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone H at ■) \ M . 33 WIDTH 2.£ss 5T a 5-^0 m Ho a 4l,0 M q(«» SO 1 a ■\ nr» OlH a a 3 1 '3sl 3 a 1 «a . c • 4^ 3 4 4 a IH O 1 a.-S' .10 s' 3 S i<r . S • r • S.F. S.F. - S.F S.F. . S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F S.F. S.F S.F. S.F S.F S.F S.F S.F. -• *7 ' II \ ■ \ - s.c-is S.F. ri I qxS.'S -[T| X100 T rr^ H i I ; ■i . Ii •* J T' B'XIol. W^ureii-s HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEEi non.i: ScT3Ac:< ZONE: (circle one) 0-75' 75-250 Existing Hardcover in Zone A.House X LENGTH O / S' B. Garage E. Patio/}eck c. Driveway - -x D,. Sidewalk \XA p.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY . , PLASTIC SHEETING X ao 7‘S‘ A 3 - X 6. Other - X WIDTH I I \ \T>\ *5 5 a 1 TjO liT Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone 2S0-5C0' 5CQ-1CC0' OM • S.F. I '^X S.F. IC^‘D O^HC. I .s') S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. /• > S.F.■V j S.F. S.F V• . • * .y S.F / 1 U:' V S.F. \H4.0O "IQ.Qft S.F. 16.0 ___ S.F. I I ;l.s S.F. ,18 ^9- •2^M 1^ „ S.F. S.F.C^^O'’^) S.F S.F. B an 4m X 100 '% ittk . 1 1 .1 •M sc 0 2^ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (c:scL£ ONE) O-T:' 75-250'(9fl^ 500-lCCC' •' * > - ■*:< rT.-'.?y 0:i!iTtrnj H ardcover IN Zone -ruo Fos? 1 f E.U - • • A.H ouse 0-.2i X ! ‘T S.F. • «LENGTH X WIDTH 1*^ T-L.O S f r • 1 5 1 a X 1 \ 1?)S ASQ> \. S.F. m •• X 1 S.F. X S.F. B • Ci Garage M X • 9 S.F. D riveway • i/rv X S.F. ^ ' 1 ‘ ” X S • S.F. n. !fsrnPWALJC X S.F. "CHLC^tc- C2-£Ck A-X 1.^ H& 12^_____S.F. 1s X "l.tV fli T-^.S" 7.1.r 1 C S.F. E. r>E- 1 ’atio / }eck i& 1 i.fe X €? O . 1 4 10>0%S.F. p.Landscape • Cp X 3 15 •S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY X Hon S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X • a • S.F. X S.F. 4 6. Other X .S.F.• Total H ardcover in Zone X S.F, Total Property A rea in Zone \ > --7 •? '7 i/5 i I » I ’..>• • J & A V ii/ 'ifcP'. •k. E.E. [I IS so. -im K 100 7.0% ■”9/To .dfeyi'-. tAMiMimillliiili IIfroTv^ . f' M; I Cerlificaie of Survey for Andrew McOermot t of Lot I, Block I and Cutloi 2. Walters-Port Hennepin County. Minnesota La^oom V i I iH-r.'r'y Is * Irw and correct representation of a survey of the bounder*?i of Lot I ‘r?^pirf ^ easement for ingress and egress over Outiuir i and 3, all corriM I Gi»iii£RG. inc. Date ; 4-29-87 ■Vealo r ■ 4d o : Iron aMrter m/AM : Judicial LantlMirk Clilf : Spot elevation Mor TO iwr» i. (irooborg nn. L*t. Ho. I<!;55 Engineers, Land Surveyors, PLanners Long Lake. Minnesota C.l‘j \ \ ■''^1 » 1 I M. ’«• ' 1 Certificate of Survey for Andrew WcDeraott of lot 1. BIocK I and (Xitlot 2, Walteri-Pori Hennepin County, Minnesota ^ODtTiOM m rw J ^*€. /SSff2^ •/ A. A - r:: I I I hor*'i*y certify th.li this IS a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of Lot 1, Blovii i. Outlet 2. loqether with a nonexclusive easeeient for Ingress and egress over Outlots i and 3. all in walters-Pori. according to the recorded plat thereof, The East boundary line of said plat is marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case NO. U546, and the location of an existing house, walk, docks, driveway and two power poles. It does not purport to show any other laproveaients or encroachments. COrriN i GRONRERG. INC. Dale : 4.29-87 Scale: I" . 40’ 0 : Iron marker #/4a: Judicial Landmark : Spot elevation rg >ti. LVc. no. Engineers, land Surveyors, Planners Lo^ lake. Minnesota a ■‘iV' / 0=r 4i SH££T L S' >4wo«ew nc Of^Morr JL-7fZ. \^MLT£Ai PoAr LtJ. oaoAJo t maJ. 72r-^£St> i % B m ii T V'--; 'm: r‘'-' ■ ■)* :iT, rS • cT* E y/sr. HOMS .1 » r ta tc PKMt/ix/tQ ’c^y-.vr" ---------------— &H)c I c I I? n z' ✓ •rtf- • KifiirjMna < I o------AdMtve 6-L-ivar. JOliTi ZIA/O HfAO£^ ^ i*!' • rsM ^ DFCK?^ FRAMING PI AN 'V' '.'■ .:•X u ^e SjTIXI V.ZrATtu xkiq*j nim^J ^ JQ!z6. COKfST^Ut^O/J AfaTBSt, fiLL JO/iT^ /i<£ Si. r^CATBO 2x<o5f EXCEPT i-^ffeyte J2 /^ac cau^/> Purr L£0(f£R HATES Af£ To &€ TKtfkthO SiXIo’T LA(,i>CO TO EXi:.7. Havif MAIL.______________ MElfiL UotSf HAxf6£/iS To BE Ty/>IC/ULV I \k i OOR PI AN ^ f jJ»i- ! V\ '••r, •, . ■>L;. ^ • *1 *■ CgoM rAi«^ TO HAirtW £x/sr (A/ GAtLJg v\v s/fAoe’ mnnrn ^ STUCCO r TO MATtM • r * I j I t._» \ \ XTt<^ FRONT VIFW . •' • • ' ••• -j vH V4'. r-o" >4 tr ; ro ^f^rcH kiff^r 1 1 i 1 \ 1 1 1 ii 1 1 i i 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 •1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 >\H } K > \) 1 / \ L-a i.------t- -X ^ -A i.-* ^ T ' I I I ) \ L ^ ''*■/■ .! H « <„ t.^ ^ i- V • •; r -i ■•■ ■' hr r,' i ■ I J vr~ 3 J^/Z /(AfTtXS ^UAk£t ra MHTZM BxiiT: tSh’t itT Atom s' £icii.r. F£LT PS^e^ P iped tKyLunr CONST DETA ©IF ©IP^.OMO ».C4» V' 3 V'’ ,"'V \ ^ j I. >SvVsrf?--\U.a. One Tv 1 ^^^R-IO-- l*l ,=» -N ^;:: b’^TcSS?. §ilLIiJ^liiis^ 34.242 MUNICIPAL CODE OF ORONO 34.242. served: Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be ob- Lot Area Acre 1 Acre Lot Width 140 feet Front Yard 35 feet Adjacent to Other Lot 10 feet Side Yard Adjacent to Street 20 feet Bear Yard 30 feet 34.310. R-ID: Permitted Uses. Within the "R-ID” One Family .Use District, no structures or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses. Any use permitted in the “R-IA” Districts. 34.320. R-lD: Conditional Uses. Within any "R-lD" One Use Dis trict, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit. Any cond’tiond use permitted in the "R-IB" Districts. Planned Residential Development (see 38.600). 34.330. R-lD: Accessorj' Uses. Within any "R-lD” One Family Use District no accessory structures or use of land shall be permitted ex cept for one or more of the following uses. Any accessory use permitted in the “R-IA” Districts. 34.340. R-ID: Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Requirements. 34.341.. Height. No structure or building shall exceed 2Vs stories or 30 feet in height except as provided in 38.900. 34.342. Side Yards. A side yard abutting a street shall not be less than 15 feet in width. 34.343. served: Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be ob- Lot Area Acre Side Yard 10 feet Lot Width 100 feet Rear Yard 30 feet Front Yard 30 feet 32-14 1-1-68 <1^ i il K-a J •% T To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson 5 From Jeanne A, Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: April 9, 1991 #1634 James & Joan Maus, 3700 Bayside Road Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IA Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) - Side setback variance required for proposed rear addition to existing residence. Required = 30' Proposed « 10'6" Variance = 19'6" or 65% List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D1 Exhibit E • Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit L Application Property Owners List Plat Map 3 - Hardcover Fact Sheets Existing Site Plan Proposed Site Plan 1977 Subdivision Weckman Memo Septic Map Elevations Floor Plans Cross Section Review of Application - The applicant seeks approval of a side setback variance for a 18 ’x22' addition to the rear or north side of existing structure. The 2^ story addition shall replace an existing sunken patio area that will result in a reduction in hardcover within the 250-500' setback area. Please review hardcover fact sheets (Exhibit D1 thru D3). There is no house on the property to the eas: (review Exhibit C), the house to the immediate west (review Exhibit G) is located behind the subject structure. An average lakeshore setback variance would be required although based on topography and existing year-round vegetation along west lot line, there is no view impact. The entire structure is located in front of the front line of the residence structure to the west. Although lots are not platted to the lakeshore, each of the properties have separate legal parcels that provide them with riparian access to the lake. Technically we are obliged to address the need for an average lakeshore setback variance. III ■iilii Zoning File #1634 April 9, 1991 Page 2 of 3 The property was subdivided in approximately 1977 and at the time was zoned R-IA, 5 acre minimum dry contiguous. The property was recently rezoned with the Landmark subdivision application and is now zoned LR-IA, 2 acre minimum lot density. Applicant notes the following hardships; 1. Interior layout/design - applicants have been asked to submit interior plans to support hardship (this will not be included in your Wednesday packet). Applicants' consultant has advised that they will be able to make the Friday packet deadline. 2. Architectural design of the structure would be destroyed if located at any other side of the house. Staff would add the following; 3. The location of the house on the property does not meet either 5 acre (50' side) or 2 acre (30' side) zoning standards. 4. Lakeside addition would destroy not only the design, but would allow the structure to encroach further into the average lakeshore setback area. 5. Expansion to west is restricted because of existing septic system. r a 6. structure will encroach no closer than the existing structure to the side lot line. Mr. Weckman's memo and septic inventory map (Exhibits H and I) confirm that the proposed addition will not inpact the existing septic system nor burden the existing system with increased use. Weckman doe'=» caution if the loft area is converted to a legal bedroom, t)ie septic system would have to be re-evaluated at that time. The addition at a maximum height of 21%' meets the allowed height requirement of 30'. Options of Action - Denial. If denied, please refer to the necessary findings in your zoning code; or 1 Zoning File #1634 April 9, 1991 Page 3 of 3 Approval. To approve the variance application of James and Joan Maus of 3700 Bayside Road seeking approval of average lakeshore and side setback variances for a proposed 18'x22' addition to the rear or north side of the existing residence to be located 10'6" from the side lot line instead of the required 30'. Approval is based on one or more of the findings noted above, and is subject to the following condition: Applicants are placed on notice that if loft area is converted to a legal bedroom, the septic system would have to be re—evaluated at the time of such improvements. wm fft- ■ -.mM -t? ‘ c'- - - v*,^ ^ 'i Jt , *u' 1 \ \ M am I ■ ifirifii i ii i ffi rdiirfili 11 II CITY OP ORONO - VARIANC3 APPLICATION n Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) it1 t 'I // A • *Trv nc rzrvui WA ) I W/ PROPERTY LOCATION U "IT I ZTiTi**!.I Wf / t »• ' V . r’ !f *r < T-1 - / w* a W / r 7 rr.i V" .4 CV4T Site Address y i±izIPT~7fii^S r7i/ ^jjuccO CvOl !^i J0l;ii i/ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) tP jf Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Ncime Phone (home) IPhone (work) '^3C- 7'>V [/r f y) ^ '-T' / Address ; ^ t ^ ^ City: Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Name _ _ _ _ _ __ Phone (work)_ _ _ _ "i? .t”/d* '-> Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired i\ - frs-(month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT OSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property ' ^iOC.L% £-££■ Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST 'Tt4t- SxOc 5<^7?/34Cfo O'* wtec. u £ <xsr Describe request in detail; )-Aor>\.r T'!> /<Jcu^ Ld>cAr%0-_________________ Other ^ x-> 'iitiT cxisrDqj ^) gc4. vHJwco A.OO' T-cO T^£- Xs? TMt TT/4Ar t HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from ^rict enforcement of zoning regulations; ~ri4C uicc. c'o_ _ _ Ti DESCRIPTION OP UNDSDAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements; \kc'*7T~ eg-_T^'o Ac>^ c, pi^<;-5eA^T«-,y jr.v_ __ Tiiv 5^T It Pwlv:!- iXKjr) ~iU ,\j 2. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS rO'-. -tmX:? 1. Completed Application Form ^Certified Property Owners List of owners within ISO' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8J5"xll"). Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll"). As an addendum to this applicationr please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variemce application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission membejrt, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification o^^hTs re^^st^_ _ _ __ Owner's Signature Date J'/?/ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements .to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building fi Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ‘ m M. •.« RUN DATE 03/25/91 BATCH 006 > . .1 . * « r HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OFMERS LIST I t PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR f : I 58 05-117-25 21 0001 00055 STUODS BAY RD N CITY OF OROeW CITY OF ORONO CITY CLERK PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55325 PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 58 05-117-25 21 0009 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNt;0 STATE OF MINN STATE OF MirtI (DNR9 CLUCE LINE TRAIL 1 A I i,) f PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 56 05-117-25 21 0015 05750 BAYSIOE RO JOm BURGER ETAL JOHN BURGER 5750 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55556 •f «• • ^v: I PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 58 05-117-23 2A 0069 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO J B MAUS I J E MAUS JAMES B S JOAN E MAUS : ; 5700 BAYSIOE RD LONG LAKE MN 55556 PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 58 05-117-25 2A 0085 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIG^D JOHN BURGER ET AL JOHN BURGER j 5750 BAYSIDE RO i LONG LAKE MN 55556 •1 I I i PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 58 05-117-23 2A 0118 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF ORONO PARK 4/15/79 ST DEED 156755 : .1 I ♦ i 1 * i* •I ’ ■ 'J ^ ‘ \ k m:I ^ f t 38 05-117-23 21 0002 03750 BAYSIDE RD JOHN BURGER ETAL JOHN BURGER 5750 BAYSIOE RD LONG LAKE MN 55556 4‘ ' f Is58 05-117-23 21 0012 03625 EILEEN ST JOHN 6 PIDGEON A NIFE JOHN A MAGDALEN PIDGEON 10912 GLEN HIL0It4G LANE BLOOMINGTON MN 55451 58 05-117-25 21 0016 05700 BAYSIDE RD J B MAUS A J E MAUS JAMES B A JOAN E MAUS 5700 BAYSIDE RO LONG LAKE MN 55556 58 05-117-23 24 0070 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED J B MAUS A J E MAUS JAMES B A JOAN E MAUS 5700 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55556 StI 58 05-117-25 24 0084 ^ 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED JOHN BURGER ET AL JOHN BURGER > 3750 BAYSIDE RD V LONG LAKE MN 55556 Vi • TOTAL BATCH 006 00016 • I f ■! :-.4 , t ) • ♦ REPORT NO. PM35401 ' PAGE I t 30 05-117-23 21 OOOS 03780 BAYSIDE RD ' HAZEL ANDERSON HAZEL ANDERSON 3780 BAYSIOE RD LONG LAKE HN . . 55356 r » I •\ • ♦ 9 •i !.» f • i ’• i- I ■f. '• • .t • 38 05-117-23 21 0013 03630 EILEEN ST D H ILSE A S L ILSE DAVID A SHEROKEE ILSES 3630 EILEEN ST MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 ,:f>' (I a. •« I ■ \ ' ‘ . • • • ■ MV,. ■ V.? .• . V*'’ 38 05-117-23 24 0039 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HERBERT T OLSON A HIFE HERBERT T OLSON ' 3640 BAYSIDE ROAD LONG LAKE MN 55356 • • M-i ' Mil.’''’.. •iM’ <V . 4 - • ■ ^ ”\ i ^ ‘■h/i • • i rf Mil.- r \ i »; 38 05-117-23 24 0082 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGKED DANIEL P CAHILL MRS DANIEL CAHILL 224 N 5TH ST DELAVAN HI 53115 I • r i.i • • i A , i t* ‘ 4 t j • , I •• i 58 05-117-25 24 0115 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF ORONO PARK 4/13/79 ST DEED 156755 ’ We)''' ■ » f ‘ &!) ' V ' 'i ’ ^ I'-.* *,' 4^ i* f * ♦ % ♦ • * ' . 1* I * . » •. ? • V. I ^ •I V / I V . # V I T «J 1 »• ^ • 1 ••**' ■— HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEE SETBACK ZONE: (CIBCLE ONE) Existing Hardcovee in Zone I A. House MO LENGTH S' t' *' 13 c2c S' B. Garage It5 c. D riveway 13 D. Sidewalk M E. Patio / D eck S' F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN JLvst .c- ■ SHEETING 6 G. Other :2.x WIDTH n «:>■ - ~ 2 Y 1 I o Xo /5^ Xo Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone ^ u V- '-^.c 250-300'''■•'SGO-ZCDO^ b-i : • 5'*b'C S.F, , / s/c'. S.p. r-r S.F. ----/.f2.S.F. / 7Cf S.F. 390 S.F. _ S.F. • S.F. S.F. S.F. • S.F. . /2d A‘ V S.F. •S.F. j zo S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. iiTI 3^6^ S.F. B x'lOO A •■.VrL : % 4 ^ • -W HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE cne ) 0-75' 75-250 Existing H ardcover in Zone 250-500L’ 5CC-IC00' A. H ouse LENGTH 5U£-C> jaeD « a (o T 3. Garage 3. c. D riveway D. Sidewalk 3 3d E. Patio / D eck A lo F.Landscape ___ AREAS UNDERLAIN ?Lst.c- — SHEETING jQ il: G. Other WIDTH \ 1 2C. ZX Total Hardcover in Zone • 1 »■ Total Property Area in Zone S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 3 2- S.F. Z3^S.F. 3^^S.F. S.F. •S.F, S.F. MSr«4 S.F. /So S.F S.F, St S.F. 20D S.F. S.F. S.F. iva-5' * « w • 375^7 I ^ Il-S* .iriT X 100 - 3 S.F. A S.F. I b1 9/Vo^ o \ : ■ ,0 - Mfa^.iilliifiiMiV.i II. ihi I i'ddt:, < ' I< ' f* i.- HA.nDCCVER C;L::LATiCN iiCRiCHEET ScT3Ac:< ZONE: CciHC’.E one ) 0-75' 75-250' &< 1371 MG H a ROCO vE.^ IM ZoNE • I, A. House 1V I CM vZ- 5'^^ ^ ' \z. 5/!a :o Cd' V 3. Gahage ^ c. Driveway ^ ^ D.. Sidewalk £. P atio / Deck W VI ■ F.Landscape areas UNDERLAIN 3Y , . PLASTIC SHEETING 1 O G. O ther 2a LENGTH WIDTH Ct4-lAi4/t 6> y -3 26 2,6 2 5^ <o Zo Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone r -5ca; 5co-:cco' f 6 Zo ^ 32'^ . S.F. iUcr^' S.F. 3 5 __ S.F. 1/ a • 'TT' \ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. OO . S.F. « yJ 27 i S.F. S.F. S.F. _MU£:l_t.r. UJ 37£^L_s.f.B |~n /■5'HS'- 4[Tf ?^5U7 X iQO.- iL L % “■■enBuilding Lccaticn Survey fcrJares 3. Haus in Lot 2, Block 1, Burger's Bayside Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the location of four buildings in relation to the South and East lines of Lot 2. Block T. BURGER'S BAYSIDE. It does net purport to show other improve ments or encroachments. c )CT!)TtItAy4r "b -J-'b UJIII ^ Atom Scale Date 0 1" = 50' 3-17-87 Iron marker M COFFIN S GRONBERG, INC. Mark S. Gronberg Lie No. 12755 Engineers, Land Surveyors & Planners Long Lake, Minnesota (~ .* -i* »i. ■'■'ir. -h: ‘.or'hvfst L/, ::‘ -ec’::;:: z-VJ'^Zs C-ir’.ific::”/; c:’ Jur/a:'; *•*.*”« n .m ■• fc ♦•• -••• • •' • V4,% . . •• A « •«•- w • ur.’-arida -:' _fCw zZ, .tuc ! . f . ,«r« S • ■ ’ ^ ato 4 • W W4A * 4#^' 1 4 • 4« 4 w • y f V a • «*te W ^ *** • -----------------ra- --------------------; • ' • 0 « . • ■«^ m ^ n"' "i yrcyccod b’^iirlr.:*.T f r.oz jui-x»rt vO si.o- cz..ir i.-.-.wrc--:r r^r.ci*c ic-i:;«n*i;, if ..ny. or M'rr/4 ^ 5" :7 .7*-> builrjCibie loLnd w .4 5" 25- Ac.r^3 cs'y 7>. *•* butid<x6ifi /d^a^cr —IEjcisfmQ ltnn««» |*. . -4 .< ► ■ 1 v'wA;Orr /4^-5' :A'h':i ■>/ Sac. S-//7-£S %a L u LiOif:un 1;. Coi'fl-. '.'vj_/^.,CiOif: I*tnu ju-f'/e or iHu rl ir.r.'rr .'’irjicsota uses'• ^ Ccaio: DuSrt : o ; 1*1= n*y Iron f5ar'<er r 1 Ci/fftrA/ft 4>/ V Coo'f^^y /W C7# 4^5 \ - lil^v f •J J i •i •] ■r;-. / ' To:Jeanne Mabusth, Planning S Zoning Administrator Pron:Steve Weckman Date:April 5, 1991 Subject: Septic System Evaluation for the Proposed Addition at 3700 Bayside Road SYSTEM SIZE AND :ONDITION The existing septic system was installed in 1970 and a permit was issued. The tanks and drainfield are believed to be undersized/ but little is known regarding the system construction. It is expected that the system met the City Code at the time of installation but does not meet the current Code. Inspections since 1982 have revealed no evidence that septic system is not functioning properly. The proposed addition to the house is not expected to have an adverse impact on the septic system. The addition will not encroach on the septic system as the expansion will be to the north and the system is to the southwest of the house. The addition consists of a family room and a loft area only. As the expansion does not indicate the addition of a bedroom, the system is not expected to encounter any increase in usage. If at some time in the future the loft area is converted to a legal bedroom, the septic system would have to be reevaluated at that time. The septic system should continue to function satisfactorily based on current usage and system condition, therefore no system upgrades should be required. Isv I. f f<- •* (, INSPECTION RECORD DATE COMPLIANCE Ak>^onF^c/toc A~kjT^t> • 1 • ;• ;i I I . i .f <93 AT> Cc//?r/?C/A^G J <]<S' ^u*iCr>^Ciro«^ 2^ '^7 lUC >^4>.?/<*aC#/o^ /VO C - CONFORMING S - SUBSTANDARD N - NONCONFORMING t . 1 • • 1 ! »♦ wj : .* t . •v' •» . •« : I. L V. *» » •o ; ,* n- • *r> v‘f I * *• » J:» :b. • M- s* I / ficlude: 1) Weil location 2) Diitance from house to leptic tanks, dist. box. and drainfield 3) North arrow and road 1. . )l . >. • y i'* Ii*• • . •2 »• ii > Mite To;Mayor Petersen & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Froa:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: April 8, 1991 #1635 John O'Sullivan (O'Sullivan's at Navarre), 2420 Shadywood Road - Commercial Site Plan/Variance Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.40, Subdivision 2 - All applications for building permits within B-1 Retail Sales District are subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission and Council. Applicant seeks approval of a 10'x25' concrete block equipment room and storage area to be constructed along east wall of car wash structure. Section 10.40, Subdivision 6 (E) - Structural setbacks. Required Existing Proposed Variance 15' (adjacent 18' 8' to B-4 lot line see Exhibit J) = 7' or 46.6% Section 10.40, Subdivision 6 (F) - Review of fence/wall standards for B-1 district. Fencing no less than 6' in height or evergreen hedges required adjacent to residential lot lines. No specific standards or limitations for fences or walls adjacent to commercial lot lines. Existing Setback * 7' Proposed Setback = 5' Existing Height * 11' Proposed Height = 11' (consists of 4*j to 5' retaining walls that support adjacent cut into bank with approx. 6' high fencing placed on raised grade adjacent to FWBI property) List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Application Property Owners List Plat Map Floor Plan Elevations Site Plan Gustafson Report Engineer's Sketch Site Plan/Survey Existing Facility Zoning Boundary Zoning File #1635 April 8, 1991 Page 2 of 3 Eeview of Commercial Site Plan - The 10'x25' storage facility is needed to provide additional ar©a for equipment needed to upgrade existing car wash. Mr. O'Sullivan has advised that the new systen- will allow the removal of the cleaning brushes and the installation of a with high pressure chemical cleaning system. There is no room within the existing car wash to support the pressure tanks needed to service this type of car wasn. The structure will also serve as additional storage area for the entire facility (not storage of additional goods but maintenance type equipment). Review of Application #958 ~ Application #958 involved the major upgrading of the property to a convenience store/auto repair/car wash. ^ All conditions of the original conditional use permit/variance application have been fulfilled by the applicant. The project has been most successful. Traffic patterns approved on the property have worked most effectively. There have been no accidents as a result of the applicant beir.g allowed to maintain the two curb cuts close to the intersect*on of County Roads 15 and 19. As a patron of O'Sullivans and 3taff member, I have never noted a problem with parking at the facility nor has the City received complaints (parking stall variance granted with #958). Review of Current Application - At the time of the building permit review, the car wash portion of the new improvements was not sprinkled. There is nothing in the permit file that provides the current staff with any background on why the car wash was not installed with the required sprinkler system. The building department will ask that the concrete block structure be sprinkled and at the same time install a system within the car wash. The Building Department advises that the cost to include car v/aah is minimum because lines have to be extended from anto repair through car wash. The applicant seeks setback variances for the proposed addition. This setback i'. sought from the north lot line of the FWBI. The Institute is located 100+* from the lot line. The only adjacent struct;''*e is a garage which was installed by the University of Minneso-v without the benefit of a building permit review. The structu-*w ipears to be 25-30' from the lot line. There is no other s».\'.i... •.e area to install the facility as it must be adjacent to th » jar wash structure. The existing grade along the east lot line minimizes the str*actural impact as the elevations at the FWBI lot line are higher than at the car wash elevation. Fencing will minimize the impact of the 12* high structure. I Zoning File #1635 April 8, 1991 Page 3 of 3 ‘'^AppUcVnt® ma”y U askel" t^provide^som^evergr^^ wa?fhave been"locatel"cLs%"fto“ot“u "®wfll^xistIp%?aSI and privacy fencing structure be enough to minimize visual impact of the encroachment of addition? The roof and exterior proposed concrete masonry block will exil?fng"eas"t «a“l' £°r om°t^e “ drfot Tine?\he proposed storage addition will be 8*. Please review Exhibits G & H for the Engineer's comments. His recommendations have been included in the staff option for approval. Options of Action - Denial. If variance setback application is to be denied, what other options can you recommend to applicant? Can upgraded equipment be placed above car wash structure? Approval. To approve John O'Sullivan's request for a building permit to construct a 10'x25' storage/equipment structure on the east side of the existing car wash to be located 8' from the side lot line instead of the required 15', subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant to install a minimum 3' wide bituminous swale providing positive drainage to north from south parking lot. Swale to be sloped away from building at a 1/2 foot slope. 2. Options on request for evergreen plantings along east side of new addition: required or not required? 3. Upon application for a building permit, applicant to provide building department with more detail on retaining wall installation (i.e. cross profile, type of support, etc.). 4. Addition shall be constructed of similar exterior materials used with car wash structure. 5. The new addition and car wash are to be serviced by an approved sprinkler system. 7-a n alliltilil fr CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double applicatig PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address A H C S ^ r) cC ^ ^ 0 .r'-y > 1 />. - V LirrcF I Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ^ ~//'7_- / / - cQC 2- j l-iiiAitc Lt-S'lltrr Attach legal description to application if not included on ni i-L'i required survey • uTTV U WVl ^-V. i I APPLICANT e'tivCirJ S'n JTH Name Atni\J 'Su. u l.« ------------ u-f •' • ' I WU Phone (home) ‘^’01 .iCi TlUl, \.'w» * / - Phone (work) ^*7 (TCI L-AtJC Address: sc hi t--City:Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:_ City:Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District ft- Present Use of Property Residential _ Other (specify) _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ L-i r* DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ (>CC0 ^ Describe request in detail: ^ i, .20m2S G■ Kor/n Srr^/^fts- VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area k: f'"* Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front _ _ _ Hardcover Jgil^f^^Side _ _ _ Rear) HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning recu^tions; . -j 4- r •:y i \Y 'r- - * 1-* »vf - ^ ' DESCHIPTION OP UNDSDAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance witt^Zoning Code Requirements: l4r urdl't^r-) i ■>/ cvT j ^/7 ' -— - ^ -i— * -»—- i-aL<Lc. C4~{^.^ r C-- '.T / 2. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Gcvt Canter 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8J5”xll'*). Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8Jj"xll"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your vaLriance application is not complete if the above infonnation has not been included. APPLICANT * S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature 4c/l'^ c-'cr>-Date L/ OHMERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature 4 _ _ _ _ _ _ Date 5 ~2- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Coaod-ssion and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building s Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. Kt^i L)AT£ 05/I5/C5 I tun oc: if’op /orp (.::*ap u:nt u>j; ifp i:M:i//.COf? ITOP AOOP o;:.ao nu:£ 7;i/PArfR »;/ftr//tnp rP(.‘P AHOR o;:!:£R h ;.mc u>r;.UR i;\M://.nDR • *sr%r%If cr l. !P l.••!C l; lAiiP a :» p HEHIICPIN COUNTY PROPERTY IHFORHATION SYSTEN PROPERTY OUNERS LIST 3» 17-ll7-?3 <1^ 0005 033'i0 SHORELINE OR IP:.'IN U h/RTl!l t NIFE IR;.‘IN 14 K4RTJN 7301 UfAUTTE RO UAI7ATA NN S539I 30 70-117-S3 II 0002 o;<iro SHAotk*ooo po EOi/CCUP SERVICE CENURS VOiACEL'R SERVICE CLNIER5 CO RO IS t l^r IUV4FRE h!l 55302 39 29-1I7-23 II OOIO 02<i55 rH/tiTl.*OOD Ru PAUL « fIJSLUJO ETAL CR r/UL H trtSLUia) I ox to lUVARRE STAHON si 4.-AT2A1A 121 5S39I lOTAL men 0S2 00009 30 17-117-23 0007 FRESIIIIAUR BIOL RES FOUO FPESHUAIER 010 RES FNO 2S00 SMADUtOCO RO NAVARRE HN 5539*^ 30 20-117-23 11 0015 024<iS SHAOYUOOO RO 1ST lUTL DANK OF NAVARRE 1ST NATL DANK OF NAVARRE CO ROAD 15 t CO RCAO 19 NAVARRE tUI 55392 30 20-117-23 II 0024 03333 SnORlLINE UR NET LEASED PROPERTY INVESTRS SUPER VALUE STORES INC tOfif 0"ATC TAX DIPT P 0 I fj.< 990 MPLS tut SS'<90 REPORT NO. P14S5401 PACE 3 30 17-117-23 44 0094 LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOtlEOIOIERS LAFAYETTE RIOCE HONEOtaiERS 1709 N FARtI ROAD LONG LAKE Nil 5S3S6 36 20-117-23 11 0017 02455 SHAOyNOOO RO JAf?100 INC JARIOO INCORPORATED OOX 60 NAVARRE NN 55392 30 20-117-23 11 0026 02500 SNAOYUOOO RO THE REGENTS OF THE U OF H R E COORDINATOR/ U OF H ROOM S06 MORRILL HALL 100 CHURCH ST SE HPLS lUI 5S45S I CERTIFY that THE FACTS REPRESEinEO ARE AN ACCURATE AID TRUE PEPRESTNIATION OF INroriNATlON AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE QtJ Tiir ormnne- Or THE HtlCilPlN COUNTY OCPARTMENI OF PROPERTY TAXATlQM^^^n Lr OF HY KNO.arOCE ANO BELIEF. PPOPLRIY T^ATION, TO THE BEST DATE ;.\| C020CS5 i • rxM ffj- s r-. ^ .1 J K Q \ ) i * W* CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OP MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO ) SS. I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1635, was mailed to the attached list of property owners . In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 28th day of March, 1991. ♦ ~ -w#-'• \ 5^’ •• • . V'v. ■ ■ *■• •• . I % krtiiilfc ifc I II CITY OF ORONO - NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold Public Hearings in the Council Changers at 1275 South Brown Road on Monday, April 15, 1991 for the purpos reviewing the following land use applications; .i-ea‘for .%rnre “Vor''rh^^’';u%p^o%%^1 constructing a new residence. 2. #1632 Steve Martin has filed a renewal conditional use permit for duplex use of the property located at 3890 Shoreline Drive. 3 #1633 Andrew McDermott of 2702 Walters Port Lane seeks approval of a rear setback variance for construction of a 3-season porch addition to the rear of the residence structure. 4. #1634 James and Joan Hans of 3700 Bayside Road seek approval of a side setback variance for a proposed two-story addition to the east side of the existing residence. ‘5. #1635. John O'Sullivan and Erwin Smith of 2420 approval of a side setback variance for a proposed storage/utility add to the east side of the existing commercial structure. 6 #1636 Steve Tibbetts, current owner of 1810 Shadywood Road, seers approval of after-the-fact hardcover and setback variances for deck additions and installation of an access drive. corporation to use the facility for conference use on a temporary basis. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. ^he meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. Written comments are solicited. Plans are available for review in the City offices, by appointment. City of Orono By: Planning Commission Jeani^ A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator To be published the week of April 1, 1991. J -e- '4 I . W:mmm; r.._ ■:■■■■■. i / .^.;.:.-V' ;-x;< Mm 'Sii i " ■‘’'ki'* '■'».^4 + v r mmim Mjn j / :s»:xn ‘B msn X :V' XA ' X s: \ S: \ ‘ s \.s \ \ ■Z 015 5 2 2o § f"> \ / \m X I S' r I S i I , ■-' iv _ .t v- .- - /SMST’^ 2 i jSg>tg‘-/4*^b* ?y^()\ llJvANL^ MH 1 m mk__jmm Bones troo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Oto G PE ^cC'f'T A, f ®E Ajseon C Anocfitk Pg L Soryata PE P<rarO 6 Vr^ ?E Gcr- ? CccK. »£ •.*X5r^ai £ Noyei P£ G ScrK«n<nf P£ Susan M E^f^ C P^ Engineers & Architects A Gcycon PE P<naAl W PosTff P£ OonjK) C B u ^qmc X. PE >nv A dourlon PE V«^ A *-*a»tU)r PE >J < **£ »(X)^ P PE Oawd O Los»cota. PE. Thcmas w Pwwn. PE Mcnaei v. Lynch PE Jan« ff ft^aiaod p£. P ®E Va « 9 aa^j P£ «oocn c Pirise*. A i a Tfyyr^l £ Angui PE ►«i>vara A sar^. rg G i''-r J Eagrtcn. PE. A iea P£ Ph4c ; Casv^ P£ •smae^ MaToe?. »£ Viar* D Waai P£ TNyn^s P ^nctnon. AlA Gary E Pytaroer Pg B »£ ^ ii) Qn^ *5 P>pne C P*umaa A i A A^r« M P«ng A ' C P Jerry D Pwsr** P£ Crc-o 0 i r ®E aooert P D tcovv p£ Gary w Mor^ ®£ Cr anes a £r cr-ic** Leo M P»%euy Hanao M Otson April 3, 1991 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Re: Navarre Service Station Variance Application #1635 Our File No. 139-1635 Dear Jeanne: We have reviewed the proposed expansion of the Navarre Service Station to create a new equipment and storage room. Site drainage and constructability factors are the significant engineering issues. The proposed storage room expansion is 25’ x 10’. The construction of the room will necessitate removal of part of the e.xisting timber retaining wall and fence along the east side. The construction will also block the only available drainage route for the south parking lot. We recommend that a bituminous drainage swale be constructed along the east side of the proposed expansion. The swale should be a minimum of 3 ’ wide to allow for snow removal. The construction of the swale will require that the retaining wall and fence be reinstalled approximately 4’ to 6’ east of the present location. We recommend that the large existing cottonwood trees be removed as they would present a safety concern because much of the root foundation needed to support the trees in strong winds wouid be removed. The owner should be required to provide a new plan with the modified drainage swale, retaining wall and fence location shown. The bituminous swale should be sloped away from the building at a l/2"/ft. slope. The swale, retaining wall and fence should be tapered back at both ends of the building to allow a smooth transition into the existing topography. (See attached sketch). Please contact this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Shawn D. Gustafson SDG.'li 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 HWf i / / / $ . 4 • •• y.. iXISIHS- WALU iVV ii j '( •i< / > —V-___L .-; / t-. «T» •« •-. ,». ^ • _• A /iO c\ T Jf \ *j \K .v*^ >/l«.U PE^^/iTALUBt* ----------------- "S* «/iJc b*"^. 5W*^'C» mmia l&iSii y^-:-, ... : ■ -;1 >'' '■ ■■:]•'V'V./•■v:i■^»^^k■i4v■.■^■...^■i■l mm'^y r^f! .:; • -^:-V IP^ilrnimmfj:;;:m^;rnmm •'it ®aa - f - AC-1 »i rs‘;A^i. - •; •. v;. mi' :V 7 ■ • lilM .' X • •...'.. vi-x-Aip^- ~]i. ■■ mm:IL m * • ‘ .V.>i Bl w. w .'V # i "^ ^ *"^?** •*"•*■**• ^ "V 3"**-' “ •'* •••“•^-«•-•• • --r- ^-•** ^ • ,^rZ*m J* •* f *J* ^ • • • •*! •*•••# •• «**^^ T "^'.•*.*** '•'1** V ^ ^ • '.’*'•* %•"’*. 1 •“«• 1 ^1# I ^ ^ ^ "* r— — s » Als.l» J r^. M fell isisS^ ‘ ir^if «k t0pi^ * “V.-^ iTseifi ym •,'t--^ hK r..>^T V-V V- ■ * . / ; ..MQiyai^i :■■ ■ :-?X ??; •#•• •• •• •••*••*♦ r rjf] Us r-. ii^rvi4 kw». i r tari »3 r-. i4.i sl4.j'-:.-:i,l-iir. i1.:i \ I—— j.p—. . I « • 1 I To;Mayor Peterson & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson 7 Prom;Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date;April 11, 1991 Subject; #1636 Steve Tibbetts, 1810 Shadywood Road After-the-fact Variances - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinamces - f * Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - After-the-fact lakeshore hardcover variances. 0-75' Setback Area = 4,500 s.f. Allowed = 0% Existing = 178 s.f. or 3.95% Approved in Resolution #1718-B (Exhibit D) 75-250' Setback Area « 13,500 s.f. (recently confirmed by surveyor) Total Lot Area = 18,000 s.f. (Exhibit H) Allowed » 3,375 s.f. or 25% Approved with Building Permit 7/12/85 - 2,109 s.f. or 15% (existing house 534 s.f., addn. 940 s.f., porous block drive 635 s.f., no sidewalks or decks, second floor deck, 49 ^.f. not included in hardcover inventory - see Exhibit N) Existing Per Recent Survey = 4,901.55 s.f. or 36.3% Existing Per Staff Inspec. * 5,059 s.f. or 37*.4%* House “ Drive * Sidewalk « Street Side Deck = Lakside Deck = 1,711 s.f. 2,809.85 124 154.7 102 * 9 m Lower Level (second floor deck located above not included) Landscape Area ■ 7.15.5 w/Plastic Lakeside Dock Stairs = 42 (3.5x12.5) Section 10.25 deck. Existing Propcsed Variance - Side setback variance required for street side 3'1" (approved per Resolution #1718-B) 3'1" 6.9' or 69% ■ • ■ . •/ ri'- ;■ ■ f r.-,*.. Zoning File #1636 April Hr 1991 Page 2 of 5 List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D1 Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K1 Exhibit L Exhibit M Exhibit N Exhibit 0 Application Property Owners List Plat Map 3 - Resolution #1718-B, Approved 1/14/85 • Permit #5678r Issued 7/12/85 Hardcover Fact Sheet Submitted w/Building Permit Survey Submitted w/Building Permit Surveyor's Letter of 3/14/91 Hardcover Fact Sheet Hardcover Site Plan 2 - Floor Plan/Elevation - Street Side Deck Floor Plan - Lakeside Area Staff Site Plan Elevation 2nd Floor Lakeside Deck Resolution #1908, Approved 1/86 Review of J^pplicatlon ** Although a building permit was issued in 1985 for the proposed addition to the existing residence on the.property, applicant has only recently applied for a certificate of occupancy. In the process of making the final inspection, the Building staff noted variations from the approvals granted for the development of this property in Resolution #1718-B ^(Exhibit D1 through D3). The applicant was advised that he had obvious hardcover problems and that applicant had constructed a deck along the north side of the lot line where the above referenced resoluton would have prohibited expansion. It was staff's understanding that all new construction at that portion of the property would have to meet the required 10' setback. The applicant claimed to be confussed because it was .his understanding that he was only at 19% and the property'was approved for 25%. Please review Exhibit F, the hardcover fact sheet that was submitted with the building permit. The 1985 building permit covered a 2-story 22'x49' addition to the south side of the structure that included an 8>i'x6' second floor deck. The permit was issued based on the use of porous blocks for the driveway. Review Exhibit N, note the building permit did include the second floor lakeside deck. Review Exhibits K1 through 2 and L, the lakeside deck at 102 s.f. and the street side deck at 154.7 s.f. were not shown on the building plans. Note also that the floor plans in the dinette area showed windows and not doors. Doors were also not shown within the existing living room area. The lakeshore deck does not encroach the 75* setback line nor an average lakeshore setback line (Exhibit M). The structure would not have required a hardcover variance at the time of the issuance of a building permit even if they were included because the driveway was to be at a 635 s.f. hardcover. J •* Zoning File #1636 April 11, 1991 Page 3 of Review Exhibits D and 0, in 1985 the City granted lot area and lot width variances to this property and the property to the immediate north. The purpose was to allow the owner to sell the lot to the north for residential development. Development was to be based on specific guidelines set forth in the approval resolutions. DeveJopment of the subject property was spelled out in Resolution 1718-B (Exhibit D). In 1986, a year after the original variance approval, the City granted hardcover variances to the lot to the north because the current owner then claimed practical hardships with being required to install a driveway with the porous block. In order to allow a driveway with an appropriate backout apron, the property was approved at 35% hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. Review the findings and hardships noted in th^t resolution. The applicant has asked the same consideration as porous blocks are not practical in this climate and create even more problems for homeowners in the maintenance and upkeep. The paved drive at 2,809.85 s.f. results in 20.8% of hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. Issues for Consideration - ^• The side setback variance for the street, side deck located 3.1* from north side lot line. . Resolution #1718-B states as follows: "Any extension westerly of the north wall of the existing house must meet the 10' side yard setback. The deck does not result in the extension of the wall of the foundation of the principal structure. What was the intent of this condition? In 1985 a grade-level deck would have been allowed 2' from a side lot line. Staff no longer considers decks with railings as non-encroachments but as part of the principal structure required to meet all setbacks of the principal structure. The deck would now have to meet a 10' setback. The deck was constructed some time in 1985-86. Applicant contends that based on the location of the current entrance and entrance to the addition on the south side, that the connecting deck made functional sense and a positive aesthetic benefit to the structure. Vi m-m mn-rtif Tii MliiM mi • 4- Zoning File #1636 April Hr 1991 Page 4 of 5 2. Excessive hardcover within the 72-250* setback area. The existing paved drive brings the property up to 37.4% hardcover. Review staff's sketch (Exhibit M). Staff has sketched in areas of drive that could be removed and still function resulting in a reduction of 600 s.f. or 4.4% hardcover. Note also that there is a landscape area under lain with plastic at 115.5 s.f. or .85%. Can the same findings be made for the current hardcover variance application as was made in the variance application of 1986 (review Exhibit 0)? Please be prepared to respond to this issue. 3. Issue of deck constructed without building permit authority. In 1985/86 deck would have been approved at 3.1* setback. Would such action have been in conflict with intent of Resolution #1718-B? The decks would not have created hardcover excesses because porous blocks were to be used for drive (hardcover was at 19%). Both decks would not have required other setback variance. Options of Action -^ . • Denial. Please refer to the necessary findings section in your zoning code; or ^ Approval as proposed and require applicant to obtain necessary building permits to cover lakeside and street-side decks. Building permit to include penalty fee. y I Conditional approval of application as proposed subjectyto applicant obtaining building permit for lakeside and street side deckSr to include penalty fee, and the granting of a hardcover variance of % and a setback variance of 'or % for street deck based on one or more of the following: 1. Approval or disapproval of lakeside deck as built 2. Approval of street-side deck: A. at current location; or m B. to be alterated to meet 10' setback; C. other. : - I •3. Excessive hardcover at 37.4%. 1 r ^ "-- -- , St' Zoning File #1636 April 11, 1991 Page 5 of 5 In review of Resolution #1908, is the granting of a hardcover variance appropriate? If so, at what percentage? - northern property approved at 35% or as removals shown on staff sketch (Exhibit M) would result in reduction of 715.5 s.f. or 5.3% or other. ■ ■ \ There is an access stair/deck structure at the lakeshore bank that is in a serious state of disrepair. The final resolution must advise applicant or future owner that structural repair will not be allowed and new access structure shall be built to approved standards (4' step width and 4'x4' landings). ■ » JT. • ^ ’ §mm rr "4' ^ ,5 .. • - ! 'V.V m ! • i, . ■lUi '• ‘t --- A' F.vi ■ I. • j ; 1 0: ■mmm • • : • ■} .V . : ’ - " . '4" * ) .•• r ‘••y ■ ' ..,U'' Jm-- - 1 4 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50,00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Pee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) •r if% .•••rrv ,-ir “"rsn i/A » ' Wf U.I iLilWf£• r~::rrcr . •••'•w— -t ' -.-w PROPERTY LOCATION Site . I g>l 0 0S> toAP. i T-t V;‘AfV»Art Aw».w w w VV»V VA "i-uV Ti im I fLU\ f T- rwi X * 1-* • »V ‘1 * ,.• « V'V' ...■ •r'.jT-;;S/ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) '^'2'— t t n-./.o i . ,‘\ # w y LV> ^ 7- f •cr rrivi-iTV^ u.vi livj. ; a -'v-w Vie*/ li, I / -- - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - ^ ~ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name I Phone (home) 47^? ^ Phone (work) _ _ _ __ Address . City; V\Ji^V2)^TA Zip;-gg^ ONNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Neime Phone (work) -4 * Address:City:Zi^: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land ABSENT OSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District '-i* jftS:Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) D^CRIPTION OF REQUESTI Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) Other V-^ ■ tmt HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:f» rOCVC OV''^-dW(>N ./T>k!, C'!'^ rmJj ‘S a ma \aj c )TT Describe unusual property Code Requirements:_ _ _ _ _ prev iting compliance with Zoning cAfr'wjt'uy^. 2. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8>j'*xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8*5"xll''). S)cetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8>j"xll"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. • 5, 6. 7. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the aU5ove InfoxBation has not been included.• 4 •* ' APPLICANT * S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees.(staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's Signature Date ONNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acJcowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Plamning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Conaission and Coun^d 1. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. Litfik ■ -T'Ti' 4 iii;. RUNlDATE 03/25/91 • • ^ I BATCH 003 il PROP ADDR OltCR NAME TAXPAYER NAW/AOOR } ‘ira PROP ADDR (MCR HAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR (MCR NAHE TAXPAYER KAHE/AODR I . •s' PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR ri5 i I i .1 T V >l *m: M«. : ! - » I r % 38 17-117-23 21 0008 01795. SHAOYHOOO RO I i 0 P1L6RAH LEROY A DELPHIE PILGRAH BOX 81 HAVARRE HN 55392 ;) 38 17-117-23 21 0026 01800 SHAOYHOOO RO S H FOSTER A R R FOSTER S N FOSTER A R R FOSTER 1800 SHADYNOOD RD NAYZATA HN 55391 f; ■ HErtlEPlN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM I*'•1 ? ■ •« » 38 17-117-23 24 0006 01835 SHAOYHOOO RD DOUGLAS H MAXHELL DOUGLAS H HAXNELL 1835 SHAOYHOOO RD HAYZATA HN 55391 38 17-117-23 24 0016 01840 SHAOYHOOO RO JOHN J BURKE ETAL JOHN J BURKE 1840 SHADY» HAYZATA m K) ROAD 55391 i; . |i . »• i ; r f f I •1' ,1 'if ♦ '* t y • It , • -A . \V I- if n.-r t i ^!li •'f >1 . I • i til . ! V M V. I !• »,t ■ PROPERTY ONNERS LIST !. ■ I' 38 17-117-23 21 0024 01780 SHAOYHOOO RD GLENDINE ANN HARRIS GLENDINE ANN HARRIS 1780 SHAOYHOOO ROAD HAYZATA HN 55391-^ \ A**'" 38 17-117-23 21‘0027 01810 SHAOYHOOO RD V DANIEL E TIBBETTS ^ S B TIBBETTS A J A JA!KE 1810 SHAOYHOOO RD NAYZATA HN 55391 * 38 17-117-23 24 0007 ^ 01855 SHADY! HARK R SALDEN HARK R SALDEN 1855 SHAOYHOOO RD HAYZATA HN 55391 w c*‘ IV I TOTAL BATCH 003 00010 « ^ 4 V.: ■: •I . ‘ ■ se 17-117-2S 21 0025 01790 SHAOYHOOO 0 J URBAN A J H URBAN DONALO J A JEAN URBAN .*^^1790 SHAOYNOOO RD HAYZATA IM , 55391 , y.y* 38 17-117-23 24 01B25 SHADY ROBERT 0 RUUD ETAL ROBERT G RUUO> 1825 SHAOYNOOO RD NAYZATA It4 55391 38 17-117-23 24 01820 SHADY TAP SCHEimER T L A P P SCHERBER 1820 SHAOYNOOO HAYZATA m 55391 RD ■* !,(• 1 i- • • I'r •!; ■ 5391 \ is.,y . . ;• •••.:'* ,J. . A i. ' t • ' J . !> ki* • ‘.‘I'll. •» f• f 'i-iv ’ ?■< ■ • I;: • I*:5:* ■ • ‘•»/}• ' .v" •: ■’ ■ ■■ •. ;\i h ’ v!': k . t 'i . V ** ’ *' .*‘-i i I A u ’ J \ f 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE REPRccENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION» TO THE BEST OF MY KN0HLED6E AND BELIEF. ♦ * ,, * *, , * • • *»11 I c I* • ■ « I»1 .1. >‘ ■ ; • j .‘.r ^.. • I' . •• s ■J - ' /J*’ DATE i h Tit t L V ..V • V V'^’ i. •’! ' > < ■ ■%' ■ Y';)-' ■ l:' j . ■ i ’il •' ■.-i. i4 ■ ■ ' S-: : ■■ -Vi :■ i!:, ^ I;■ ^ ■■/I S ' i'-.V; ■: ;,rv.: ii; m t - Wi.-l., 1:..' •.•.••f ■ \ i * •{ *• I*.. ' . i..' iji'i-.' “ i • » i-..» It (ao) ii •• : 10 15 :a 15 1 It V (53)(3^)(55)(%l (57)(9)j (O)(44) -••r • 9)ia^ afV ---------?B---------*“"1 — ------s IT* (2)(1)2 I (1) 1 lot /, a.oa ■ CSYSTAL 9AY VIE* ! I (10); Msn .(II) (12) *(13) ?45 44 (13) .....................loff. ................................. 777. 4> “ *( 14) R (35) IH X MPLESA^i ■I—_ IH U _------------- rrisrr^ 13 - I iWTi E no. 15 2 , CS «T 10(17) . 95 I •? ^85 25 'i ( 18)'^; ^754 rj( 19) t>5 5 f - --J f^rt j •/ 4 • • . r* 95 0 > A ^ V Aj 100 1 ^ \ * s\ A ty \ ---------T3T1 t T \ ^•<C’. AX j .rsr.r. /»^ \ . > r •'.j* V . *-^^ City of ORONO I** .fer '!*%* ■4'% i » «Y g:. i= ^ .pV • ^ N‘ - • «•• • ••• •■ T*'--r » .**> ‘4 \. ■*■ i|i''’CLTYXv RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL r" »*' - -r*‘NO. 1 71 R-H QRQNa GRANTING A VAK/ANCB TO MUNI’. Z( NINC CODE SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISlC.^ b (ti) PILE 1874 WHEREAS, Mrs. Donald Johnstone and Duane Barth (hereafter "the applicants") have an interest in the property located at 1810 Shadywood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 22, Shadywood (hereafter "property"), and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the* City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdiivision 6 (B) to allow a side setbac): of 3.1 feet for an existihg house where a 10 foot side setback is required. NOW TOBREPORC BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: V « • FINDINGS !• This application was reviewed as part of zoning file* no# 874. :/ 2a The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshorc Residential Zoning District. 3. The property is 17,200 square feet in area, has a lot width of 60 feet, and contains an existing house. 4. The existing house is located 3.1 feet from the north side property line and 57 feet from the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka. 5. This house and the proposed house expansion and improvements tc the property can meet the hardcover requirements in the 75-250 foot lakeshorc setback zone. 6. Because of the required 75 foot setback, the building proposed for the adjacent Lot 21 will maintain at least a 20 foot Separation distance between the cxistinq house on Lot 22 and the proposed house on Lot 21. P«» l».* i • • D (* P J L. -/ ••‘C r.TX >2 • , V.*... V ‘ V- ^ - * r. W I 1*111 Ilf" ■ f 11 I 0-/ City of OR.ONO rt: 1' ■ K*’C1.TY>:" RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 171 B-h_______ 7- .Ulr.., ..QRQNajk'- - * < d GRANTING A VAk-ANCB TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (D) FILE 1874 WHEREAS, Mrs. Donald Johnstone and Duane Barth (hereafter "the applicants") have an interest in the property located at 1810 Sl.adywood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 22, Shadywood (hereafter "property"), and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the* Cijty for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, SubdiJ/ision 6 (B) to allow a side sctbacic of 3.1 feet for an existihg house where a 10 foot side setbaclc is required. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as part of zoning file*-:^. 874. :/ 2. The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family La)ceshorc Residential Zoning District. 3. The property i.s 17,200 square feet in area, has a lot width of 60 feet, and contains an existing house. 4. The existing house is located 3.1 feet from the north side property line and 57 feet from the shoreline of La)co Minnetonica. 5. This house and the proposed house expansion and improvements tc the property can meet the hardcover requirements in the 75-250 foot lalcoshore sctbacic zone. 6. Because of the required 75 foot sctbacic, the building proposed for the adjacent Lot 21 will main tain at least a 20 foot separation distance between the existing house on Lot 22 and the proposed house on I.oc. 21. f).i I • • I J 4Jw'«%T :A*-^y-' <i City of OROIVO RF.SC ..UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ^121j Lz21_______ 7. The City Council has consiclereil thii: upplir.ition including thu finclingu and rocommcnddiionL ol the P]«miiing Commiscion, reports by City staff, comnunts by the aplleant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 8. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it ar.d do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not neroly serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right cf the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Crono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to allow a side setback of 3.1 foot for the existing house at 1810 Shadywood Road where a 10 loot sotuack is required, subject to the following findings: 1. Maximum hardcover allowed on the property shall hi. square feet. ------------ 2.775 ^ •All future improvements to the property shall meetthe current performance standards of the LK-IC Zoning District. In addition^ any extension wester v of thi»*north wull^of the "existing house must meet the i ) loot j i a c yard s c* t h a c K requirement. - — 3. Applicant shall obtain a Hennepin County driveway access permit prior to construction of a new dr-veway to serve this property. 4. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, buc arc permissive only and must be exercised oy application for a huilding permit within one year of the date of Courci 1 approval, or rnis variance will expire on that date (fanuaiy 14, I'Mif.). paMe J ol - * ♦ I • a. IK. It •' »• .... .v kifya iP§usy - -Ti 11 .tj - -m '- ■*? r •# I-»'> City of OROrVO RESC .UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. - _______ 7. The City Council has consiclered thii; applir*it ion including thu finciingo and recommcndjtlonti ol ihvj iMunning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the aplleant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 8. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it ar.d do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right cf the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to allow a side setback of 3.3 foot for the existing house at 1810 Shadywood Road whercT a 10 toot setback is required, subject to the following findings: 1. Maximum hardcover allowed on the property shall bf 2,775 square feet. — 2. All 4‘uturc improvements to the property shall meetthe current performance standards of the LR-IC Zoning District. In addition^ any extension westerly of thr^^ViOrth wall**of the "existing house muse meec the iO foot ^ide yard setbaclT requirement. 3. Applicant shall obtain a Hennepin County driveway access permit prior tc construction of a new dr.vcway to serve thi;; property. 4. Authorities granted by tnis variance run with the property not with the applicant, buc arc permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Courcil approval, or mis variance will expire on that date (%*anuaty 14, l*iHf.). pu'ie J <ji D- •f .f SS.M. . ^ . I.City of OROIVO :t«^ V,5?riCrTr,^r' ,?r^0l=^.-4 ^QRONp.' Ll., ‘-A ,.^ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _______ •;V av ;- ■•'.•/'<'’'• •■ •■:■; .. ^ t fS*!::?: 5, Violation of or non-complianco with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. -r 6. The undersigned applicant has readi understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council on this I4th day of>*' January, 1983. ATT] /Dorothy M/^allin,^City Clerk si Mary C. Butler, Mayor •v. # ffrTU (i) Property Owner oA''< '• • * *> . ■■ ::.H: ' v» • • ■ '••* *. • •». <••' ■ ■ .page 3 of 3 ICIT Ei 'i.f. jiMiibr APfilCA^^ POW CERTinCATE OF OCCUPANCY pxx BOX ee. cuvstal bay , mn eexa v 473-7357 -i' . # - 4*H ^ V' PERMIT NO. > 5678-m'DATE ISSUED meocPAim«eirr . . POSTOFMCf i w VAa OATS ^ , \4«» >r** -I-" >W. OOMaUMOATC . - "m'w • ^ LOTAMA / .Wiom.. V, OCPTM pfiOTOSio senucKAs fpow^^A«xog/«a/, AiwwgM / n f fROPfimr lOEwnrtCATJOw no . C Hr- SUBDIVISION,w . [WAR. .i^.usioe is:r lake ,; .r.WCTLANOS. vv:;' ACCESS''* r'- ' t^A ;. V.'. *VN€W . AOCMCY - ^ • A? ., •>*.•*' OOOKTVy^*^ ,,^ ‘ - .*. . .* ». f ' ' T- ETATB tsf ‘iw> -^^4. -r -;u*‘‘ A • » PVIfVATE EASEMENT . —. ** »♦ 'T-rhi.u. * Mui Crtify Mi^t^-FtmUy. Comm»TciBl A In^MttruN C-00»tniCllon PimM (FVm)iPf)CO^) 'hLc>4K 7^iy:A\laJ(^i^ TYPtOf WORK fWnxxJ#i A#noval« 1 P ^ gga;^T«. ’ Xp ^DWELL. nrs ALLS STORIES B NUMBER O^ BEDROOMS SEPTIC Af^ DATE RNOROSEO USE , , ► COUNCIL APR DATE V«/. frf> MMAIIKS:^1 k -j i y ,k EBUmai^ ConmnKtion V«ki«tkwi S f ^..BOto BLoaiwttur PtrtMfT FEES ^ •./^8--sr> STATE PEE - PLANRSV1CW 9.g^> cl* • V C/. A ^ SACCHAMU. acwcnuNiT V :■'>.:■!■ PARKFEf • :*• PeMAtTV y;.’,: . «'. J n^r -OTHEK TOTAt oue.^^^^/. ;5i- V.>•. ♦ , .i!tiS|»‘ajla?V'<-.<4N.yf"ffc-'vWi' . V- '-INn ccg^riNAL ,,inswion , wom'bkyono or wtthout a re OUIRCO INSPECTION WILL 8£ SUS JECT TO PENALTY WORK REOUIRINO . /SEPARATE PERMITS V w*' i^V- , ' . ;ptuMSiMo /^I pfc'-l',i ♦ A [ma c kanicai . .r.wT;;....... 'wmlL - ■ □ •fpTia ..................... ;§■ HOPtCDOM MUST M CAILCOHN 24 HOUI18 IN ADVANCE. ■ MWtK.................. WATIK............. ... OAAOMO t PKXINO □□□□□ ACKNOWLETOEMENTg^IPl^ TNC UNOtRSiONiO THE REM. iMPilOVfMCNTS -<ANO/fD0QLAIU.S upiotR ^fftAATY o^ um ACJUBOwiEOOti^rT^AW^AoaiPT ANCi O^ ALL W^ORMATION. CONOTTIONS AM ;RSOUiR w, MCn TA ACPCtMMTtO ON THW OOCW4ANT. T** t.WNOAA- MNIO ruNTHCM AOACU TO 00 MX WONK M flWCT COM- nuANCt WITH Au ctrr op onono ond »nanc ii ano etatc OP WNNtaOTA OOIUKNO coot WOUWEMENTt, . ■ .«,OOCORtCtlPT »• t. oorr^^ ¥VHir«-Btct ^ CAMAPVHICMVCTOfl ,v miWt-ASSiSSOR .•. hil, - V V s --------jA>n^ 12-flr ‘ **4- . V «i Oo«M> . v.v ^ V- CCMI«t f uct i <M f)AA«i<I im^lmd0t ^ r'‘*'’ * ^ *'’'t. * umifraHiT urutmm: mim ?V*i. >, . • . r hmM Ib •»Uk 9mildim§ fmwkt Ay^)U«iio*i ■**5k ••,4/* <y -A.* ^ ’ 1. firfti riaor plan 1. foott*^ ^ (p«Mi4«ti«i pl«« 1. n«irttipnt 4 IMA^ ^ ‘ 4 . W« 11 »«<t i fMiSH * C*i%lli«Pt« tonwfr'iMr^Mvr Mlr«Uil«Ma I>«t«lU tfrpiMfr plMw #• frmiM > ••»• *<Cmf%¥9€%ifm b| M f»f f>i»nd«r.u «•« #« 4li« LW!*W» - ttJir* 4*^ tUf fpMijr ' ‘** • * ^r.k • krun Hutr If muimo im»x nA» trvicv 11 vmt > • «^j»«f !• • p«MtC7 . ,}j^ ----------- , '•'t! Fwis^f ttyiiil »» vUI«wt • fi-.*<fH U«»MiiM will k* <.i.~V.__-«ywl-u^ •'* •' / ''*' lffr-?:l>..<fCKjnwl »-*-.• r^ •'* (AddfM4l-^Tcuflsj ■& w Ti m^rrs <^7 r wou $mA(. sr , . ;.■'•»>i ^AJkAlt ' ^jgygSiffiB5B3Bl ■OltOiit *‘®«»*^'*'‘^'fflfn»I ■'* (A^ldrm) ^ SW^ T?e^£nS ^’Tdrmusv^if^, *^(iser ^ m} ijvv* .7: ■If- TYPiOFWOUK . V Nfw ■nooirldiu^B. Addition Aomodil l * M COWT,TYn iOOCfOJ If *-» fif- «•!• »ri ♦'• »■.*'•• UlOiMTIAl OIWI.U .4H'»4 it U#HT1 •• •» •tOO.ffZf. f if r ,r » i • -%*‘\' « W- ‘ i /'r". Hi, f> V ^^* - ■iTO^iiijlLi ; V V /.•WI4t/fUI ^ / ' 1. . . -r ^ — 3 fIT. COWIT. VALUATlO«t^^<j ' /0,J 41^ muMUi ^ ••'.-'i'^ij'f^- 1 l^fVc-U^XS ii<g- "t«.' V4^ 3 yv" r - • lOM AtOUfAtO «M« A •«. kh M *M» ^fff ««MM4fV. 24 hour notic* on all insp. IW0A« MOUtAMPO liv'AAAU MAwni CITY OK ORONO 1 '■ 'S-I Mtt . umim . T^« iMttby Mk«» 4ppHc4tlMi (0f • A«lt41«c iMtrwlC tor lA« «Mrk 4««crl4«4, 4fr««« i« Ao all v»rk in •(rt«l accor<i*/%«« vUA lha •rtfirvancc* ol iK« Cliy ot Or AAA A a 4 rMllAfA of t >« li«i« WiltftAi Ca4« Divt»to*i. «n4 AartArAt iA ac Ail faait 0n4 r t^rtiofno t lo^^t <tat«A h«r«ln ara irA# omd CAfrAAt. t%. w • « .-*• ,0 /•»/•/«--m te>. A will BMt *11 of th« ntJ.of yoor \nmt ordiiumco cxid vill a1»o h«l grosBd?MtK:T«q^rM«&C,-;ln Cha 73 to 230 foot tona which '"V*r-r» .-cj, ’ , r""ta?; pr«Ti£Mlf^<|MatiocM^ aaaclng. Thasa two Wi ■•*> •_■ r-*-' T ^•vUf V • i.ofi!our^bulldinf proposal follows i ? /• < - »A/’ ‘> 'f J; •/ ^DuliainiJlaa . daooraclva.porotta - U>ek.%drlvaway 428 sf X 33X . V'* ■' ■ - 2280 sf 13,000 sf 9,120 sf 1,839 sf 233.4 sf ..m - -rK^J '■ 'r:‘rr»fl • . *r.A.s> ■* '•iy •j? ■^2 ‘is .it *^*!•it Lioiswl. ui ordlnanca 'i-v ■ i'- 2,074 sf - o'a •nkArfO * ‘ :>lni75 ’.-to 2! 17,000 sf 11,100 sf 940 sf -'W*,Yfe- '•>5. &4iSt^yA •% .V!»jyrOT firxt-/ .vVV-.'--aafc« m r'iT '■<S vZ. T wV- >^.C*, * TOMMd.da^AClwa .porotia.v -,><. ^ )AVia^bIookt.drlv«way. ^633^;8f,.X 33X. a ordliumca ■ 2773 sf A< 334 if 1,825 sf '-^6.4X^ 2,775 sf feW^rsiAepoVet. k- ' r ^ •I' •?» ......... « S)^7.W^a .. -»* ^ :-if .y-. •- «3g< •^^fVM-Y-'' '--- • f^ir*y^^w*t ^af- “T‘ '7 ^y-:^s’-.A- ' u- f </ *: iris. 5&- ' ■ ' IV! f-* '1^' J?r. ^‘r »hv/ r r,74 \ WVf 7^2 \ ..... is L t J :• •': r •• ‘A’" ' YC J'iU i2000* i « ► \ • ro;-* 1 !’i'-:i>-*‘ '»'* .'*urv‘*y \!‘or If-y A. Moyt of Loty i^l and ^2, Shadywood Henrioplri Couritv, ilJ CO• 1 -•» OC f\ ■-—. '? 1 {*• (' ’IL,1 cf) ^ I - D •• •** '. ri ' ¥ Si Ci —* •*•• P- '•* 1 ■ ' - 1 k2 T^.;i < •“ L'l :;'l •■.■''■r~^ -r^^l :• . 'I \t •' i *5i J * > —* u *• ' •* » 1-* > I ^r. t-N- i '<14 ^ 1/5 ; ' s;f #■’■ : hcret-i ccMi:> l:.;.i U.lt. Lt* a tr.x a.vi oirrt-^i ri-preicnVitl-j. >i a a;.n ty oi tn-.- oouiuUries of Lots and r“, Jyv\>.jd , and the Ijcalion oi all eA.>t i.. b .ilJiii^t: *j.c;'c.5n. It «ues not jiorport to bn.tv. Jti.cr I •.;.rv#vc;«.ci*l& or tiaCr^bCiu-^Oi.tfic . .i- / *>I •** }- • . ur tt! ' *l>cjkie-ti/1 Inch * bo Io«t i£j i GOKLX>N u. CJKUK WV/ • I INC.•?* — -«u « •. t - • bate ) June 1 ?, i^'iiu, .>*.•»<’ o : iron .rarker tte t;, ^OC 6vXb Mark 1-. OronberB acB* No, V21^$ i-.MBineerc nnd laind 3uz*veyors I.onK Lake, Hlnneaotii SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY (612) 476-6000 WAYZATA. MN 55391 FAX 476-0104 March 14, 1991 n s -'1 f1 *♦ Mr. Steve Tibbetts 4975 Industrial Street Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 • t ✓ RE: Lot 22, SHADY-WOOD Dear Mr. Tibbetts: M We have calculated the total area of said Lot 22 to be 18,000^sqdare feet. ■ The area of hard surface coverage of said Lot 22 is 5140 square feet. This gives you a hard siirface percentage of 28.5 X.» * Sincerely, SATORE/BEROQU^T, INC. 5%^ /). ^ ^ Thomas S. Bergquist Registered Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 7725 TSB/dm ^4. TV < -• ..t ■A'i • r'1 HARDCOVER CALCilLATiOtl KORKSHEE- SET3ACK zone ; (c:3ci.e ome ) 0-7S' ^7E-25a‘ 250-S00' 5C0-1G00' Existing Hardcove .r in Zone St;.' . mm • • A. H ouse • X 3 i ^ ^ f. S.F. LENGTH width rT'' ■•• • ' _ X ^ 7 •■* e »•S • r • •% * * * k"' "X \r' ./ i - • ' a < t i i0 .• m S.F.1 1 X S.F.u -. w _ X S.F..f B. Garage X .S.F. • ...... c. D riveway I:ls. ,.,-7.5s's,P, •m :IN ‘ i U X SI ___ S.F.1 V ft » -F 0. Sidewalk ^ X 1n'-J-t ^ “•"* • S.F. ^ ^ . • # X •r ' .> S.F. * % t 1 n ^• • -- ................S.F.9 • E. Patio / D eck f ^ f / * ^ X '6 m •S.E. V: ^ •. •^Tiw ■V'V- F.Landscape X a '-..................._ S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY X .4.CA. //S.^ ^ S.F. *v PLASTIC SHEETING X • V S.F. X _S.F. .« • 6. Other X a S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone . vto ."r S.F. Total P roperty Area in Zone I ( * ij * * t nn^ 100 V3^ 5'£>0r? "”"V J f A '*) s ^ •B> :-r V‘‘'w LtmmA ____S.F. 'H.7-'9/Vo F ^L-- S'? r-r *.» • . •v • Tr ►•-r fliai ,,. 4t /(,t W90 O - .. . efcm » • m ^ - m . VV^:- . iVciil / •• ^ # •• • * .1*«: * . .»#•••>* >••*./ • '* •' • V**' »••-*. - { :s* . ;;rM. \ _iaa STMRSI ft PORCHES fUl Stniotfod Memten Must BeAppriW^; ijufoodOf NaKnal Ite^nce To D^y t)r;.f * % •.'.' |-■'** «'‘I* * "V I-:-1 ' 'i - I .--.H. / ••.•;'* 1/ <k \ ^ •»» t* IkvV■ —.. ....................................................... ^1 V t :• ^ «% I ; * .' • • * *% f • ^ <» « i ^1 • • • • . _____ • '• • • «b« / V . • % • 0 • 'V W • • • *», ■i • %ft fikCw: AJaniX\ q~M~~ viTOofagaiii si'$ i T?*"2 — - •• ••♦ IE. ><. xsirvn ^ %LO<^...VUO iUU / • • V • • ■ ' *•. s»• ■.«• • ^ i ^ f i i i \ % 1$ kA < I-' < • •■> oPidT •ATTIC* At^ BE 13 »11j;• w • •* ,V .if' • %*. •• ' I .1 ------------- -_ ^ ^ - .-( \ . . '.. . . -"•' -r*-’ . .. f \ ' h.. • • • I ‘• *1 ■f.. 'fc '.; '. ' • .l *'.'’P//- y ••% » -*• H. : ■•* J « • • L :*^T ♦ .' •* ^ V^'. rr. ft .» •. i •. *• • . # i. • • •• • J» ,' MIN. WQpD TO • * 4 I o • • __m- - :-.- >v ""• ' ^ *•;•»■• r ’ »r ' i . -'. !' M.* .'J*- V., i \. i . ;v -.r*’ K- ^ • ,*v.' •, V,. .*,. /-;.■■ ■ -'r'y^'Wr ■• v‘- * ■. I'^di i-*"-- ' * ...... r'''' ■• ----- \ ; .? • 1 \ § I I '.O rtV ^w % :i r ' --Him" ' ■^■Yvrt^T- 7»—"/■ r- ■•• m-itrpr rt-* »• I i \ %il 9 • •^t: • # • <»< mm. O I IpiTIZZ * • •r- ♦ \J t N b o iO ^ p Pie r* 9r • • V*lV _ i Vo:c /i^X<rc 1 c~.X • • • •« . I * «« fl r • I ( h*.» I ' « * V»> -7 . V' r ^ •••■’•*■ .’•I.”!.. r .. miiN. nc.iv3n I MAX. OPENINGS » ' Porrr PEtKS: STOIRS S PORCHES /^ttuctiiral Membtrs Must Be Appioved -j^od Of Natiual Resistance To Decay Or Treated Wood. —y.-------- u*”» c -■»tv wr ipporled Laterally olid Blocking \PAm ret "5 TOCed k.>rr^V *>T• i^rr a<n ^ C * ’i T u Pj ^ I fe** ^ r V* *'•'* (ft 0 » -----'• >6 A A e. A.-rr^c—~| r •■■ I “Ttoj c 1T Y o r c > 1 •' -' > , Qt-MLDING IMi-.H;//]IT J-I A "'' /lafj I .V-: ,, J^^SPCCTCR t'ATn J7 f-T A^’r‘1? • • f / / » ^ *K V»-•« \ < *. Al t JfA h ^ -OTArf-. ■ -tthii. alii;if.I r ^ .-VySi... u' ' ¥ of OnOINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1908__________ A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 PILE f996 WTTPREAS James McNaughton (hereinafter "the wHERBAL# A-a4* 1 flon ^hAdvwood Rosd within tho City°ororonoThe/e?nf£te? “cTty'') and legally described as follows: Lot 21, Shadywood (hereinafter “property ”); and WHEREAS, the applicant *°s^bdivis''io/°2’'to variance to Municipal Zoning Co ® . which will increase the permit the paving of a 'driveway and backup pad w^^^ 2s“73-250' hard- 75-250 ’ lakeshore hardcover to 36.4%, exceedxng rne cover normally allowed. Minnesota: HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #996 't • The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family.Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning '’th^^December 16, 1985, and recommended approval of the p . variance based upon the following findings. A) This property was granted lot area and variances per Resolution 11718-A on January variances were granted at that time, and tions of Resolution »1718-A "“^at th^ ha*rd- improvements must meet City the 75-250'cover must not exceed 2,280 square feet (25%) in the 7S 20u setback zone. y ■ of lot area by the surveyor which would allow 2,444 squ feet of hardcover in the 75-250* setback zone. K n-;‘‘ i' C) The house was constructed, and gravel ‘3“''®“®’', iLtalled in excess of the hardcover ^4 Excelsior Design, prior to applicant s p property.Page 1 of 4 1 '■^^3 ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 1908NO. severe climatic extremes, and will suffer frost heave and failure^ of'^sucr!^ wouYd^ potentiaWy^ trofthe usage conditions. not have to back out onto County Road 19. F) 'T’he requested 75-250' hardcover of 3e.4% is not exceptional but is similar to many other propertxes along Shadywood Road. -4 * 4 The City Council has c -nsidered this application the findings and recommen .ations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, com: ents by the applicant of the proved variance on che health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds :hat the conditions existing on this Drooerty are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to pther proleriTy fn ?his zoning d strict; that getting the v ™ wnnlH not adversely affeec traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the appli- caft; fnd would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLOSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby than 35%, where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, subject to tne following conditions: 1. The driveway, backup pad, house, and other hardcover in the 75-250* setback zone shall not exceed 3,421 s.f. or jd . Page 2 of 4 t: • ^*r- ^ 1 of ORONO • a f.ixs< - -j RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1908__________ 2 Authorities granted by this variance run with the property that date (January 13, 1987). 3^ Yj^ation of or non~conipliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authorxty granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 'f- 4. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf-of hxmself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title or the property. •# •Adopted by the Orono City Council on this? 13th day of January, 1986. ATTEST: • '■ W IthyrtT Hallih, ^ty Clerk Mary C. ^tler. Mayor I 1+ Tim Adams, Acting Mayor T) Property Ov/rier / lii !T ■P•• ' .•I I’ L l -' • 5: iVW V Page 3 of 4 • . • . w • • . I . . \ 4 . • . W • ^ ^ ^ 1 f 4 • ti -• • i . «• ^«*ir -«-• —^City of OROIN O -?9»3 irV QE=" RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1908_________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this -I ^day of S.<<^'i<A¥ZY 1986 . before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared ^ c <iA4-Tt;a1 known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC yC •i •4 • J Lc.-- y//?s^ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES / STATE OF MINNESOTA ) I • • )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this 7 day of .t r 1986, before me a Notary Pubiic within, an^ fpj: sai^ County, personally appeared ^ known to me to be the persbn(s) describeoT in and who Executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. r^st^ " r . '■%NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 4 of 4 ■f U|'m I gf-tf I mm T ' •' ’ .-V. 17'.:'4 413 ■ r?c>, ^?TJ STATE OF MINNESOTA ') ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) CITY OF ORONO ) I Dorothy M. Hallln, City Clerk of the City of Orono, Hennepin County* Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Orono with the original record of such resolution in the Minutes of the proceedings of said City Council at a meeting of said City Council held on January 13 . 19 M . ««<* that the same is a true and correct copy of*said resolution was duly adopted by said City Counoil at said meeting. % In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 30th . day of January __ _ _ _ _ _, ,.19_i6 /Dd^othy M. Hj/llin,City Cleric v 1 (SEAL) f I - I-'.. *TSn^^'i. mm ■ if. ■1. iPSR * «■* '> ’ i f .IS wm f TO!Mayor Petersen & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:April 12, 1991 Subject: #1637 Spring Hill Land Company, 725 6th Avenue North - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance- Section 10.07, Subdivision 1 - A zoning occupancy certificate shall be required for new occupancy and use of an existing building when the new use is of a different zoning classification. Review Section 10.29 - RR~1B~1 Subdistrict. Section 10.29, Subdivision 1 - Conditional Use Permit required for church use. Section 10.29, Subdivision 2 - Seek clarification and either amend or grant variance to this Section if a profit-making entity, in this case limited partnership, is allowed to operate conference center.r Section 10.61 - Allowed signage for church - 12 s.f. in area per surface allowed for church signage. Such sign must be 5* from any property line and cannot exceed an 8' height. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H ExhibitI Exhibit J Exhibit K Application : / Applicant's Addendum Plat Map Property Owners List Addendum on Freshwater Foundation Proposal Addendum on Woodridge church Map Designating Areas of Conference Center to be used by Church Site Plan of Conference Center Plat Map Designating Ownership of Conference Center Boundary Survey Letter to City Attorney m Zoning File #1637 April 12, 1991 Page 2 of 4 Review of Application - In 1988 Spring Hill Conference Center was closed and offered to sale to, hopefully, another non-profit organization. The property was offered for sale for approximately a year and a half and at that time was purchased by Judd and Duncan Dayton. Since that sale in the fall of 1989, the property has remained without a use. Staff has not been provided with any information as to any limitations placed on the Dayton's when they purchased the property but it is their intention as set forth in their addendum. Exhibit B, to offer the conference center for temporary use until a final development plan is developed and finally approved by the City. As already noted by applicant, the property is now back on the tax rolls. Applicants have not received any renumeration to cover maintenance, taxes, etc. The current application involves a comprehensive request by the owners for the temporary use of the conference center by both a church and the Freshwater Foundation, both non-profit organizations. It is m.y understanding that they would like the application to cover all non-profit organizations that may seek the use of the conference center. The current application involves the following land use issues. Conditional Use for Church *7 f * > Conditional use permit for church use is consistent with all other zoning districts. Please review Exhibits F and G. Staff sees nothing that would suggest the church will not meet-the standards. The total congregation at a maximum of 250 is under the maximum allowed under the ordinance at 300. The specific request for signage can be worked out with the church. Please refer to the standards noted above. A zoning occupaincy certificate review would be required for both the church and the new conference center use under the new form of ownership. The Issuance of these certificates do not require Council approval as long as these uses are located as permitted uses. In this case, Seciton 10.29, Subdivision 2 is very specific. Under the RR-lB-1 zoning district, only one additional permitted use is allowed, conference center for a non-profitmaking organization. Spring Hill Land Company is classified as a profit-making organization. Can this application be accepted as a variance application to a performance standard or would this be considered a use variance, and in violation of State law? Staff will seek the guidance of the City attorney on this matter and provide further direction at your meeting. If the City Attorney opines that this would be considered a use variance, then applicant should be advised to seek an amendment of this Code section. l I 5 h .. i'-. ■' ■: ■' i ' .ii-rw Q Zoning File #1637 April 12, 1991 Page 3 of 4 The aspect of the temporary nature of the request may shed another light on the application and may simply be resolved by an agreement for a specified period of time between both applicants and the City. This again will be another issue the City Attorney will be asked to address. Please note the applicants propose no physical changes. Except for the signage there will be no change in physical appearance of the facility. Note none of the meetings or conferences proposed by the Freshwater Foundation will exceed the 300 persons occupancy limit but even if this were to occur, such a meeting would be allowed under a large assembly permit. This would be the responsibility of the owners to monitor. Review Exhibit E, detailed information on the Freshwater Foundation's proposed use of the facility. Except for the isr< c’ non-profit versus profit-making, the application appears s?:-::a';iVV*orward and consistent with all other standards of zoning ur ^ .. ‘ he RR-lB-1 zoning district. If this issue cannot be resolvea i our meeting of April 15th, applicant may be given the opportunity to separate the church use from the conference center use as the addendum for the Woodridge Church notes the immediate need to occupy the facility. ^ Pending resolve of the ownership matter, do' Planning Commission members have any other concerns that should be addressed? ’ Options of Action Conditional use permit for church use - If members concur that church conditional use permit can be separated from the comprehensive application submitted by Spring Hill Land Company, members may grant a conditional use permit. ; ' As for the issue of the type of ownership of the conference center, the following issues must be resolved by the Planning Commission before they can formally act; 1.If non-profit is determined to be a performance standard for the permitted use conference center, then we need only address the need for a variance. 2.If non-profit organization is considered part of the permitted use, then to consider a variance would be in violation of State and local codes. Would you approve a zoning amendment that would allow a profit-making conference center use? If it is within the City's authority would members recommend a temporary agreement for a limited period of time for the applicants/owners based on the uniqueness of the facility and the financial investment (physical improvements) that exist on this property. 1 .J I r. Zoning File #1637 April 12, 1991 Page 4 of 4 In any case, the approvals of either the conditional use permit or how we address the conference center use, the following may be included: 1. i iL l: * .2. 3. Isv t:.'' S-: W Lji'V ti'r r=«» >■ Legal combination of the parcels that make up the conference center use. It is not clear why the City did not require the legal combination at the time of the major additions in the early 1980's. Any user of the facility should be adivsed that if membership or attendance of persons exceeds 300, that a large assembly permit must be applied for from the City of Orono. All signage shall be subject to the standards set forth in Section 10.61, Subdivision 2. •# * I * * rdiimiti iiMiliiirifrAatii r; CITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND OSE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION ^ Site Address 725 County Road 6, Orono_ _ _ _ _ ‘‘f'" 1 K a Prccerty Identification Nur.ber (P.I.D.) 2d-118-2j-33-0002; Please attach lecal description to application if net incj.uoed on required survey. applicant Spring Hill Land Company Name Limited Partnership_ _ _ Phone (home) Phone (wor)':)4 7 3-3332— - -...■..•T XT' Address Suite 220 , 445 East Lake StreetWayzata «:tp-__ 4 to c w OWNER (if different than applicant) Spring Kill Land Company Name Limited Partnership_ _ __ AddressSuite 220, 445 East Lake Stree Seotember 1989 Phone (home) ^ f 1 w* w‘ • V V r-•^ Phone 4-73-3332 • - nw. • yv Lv *■ ' r* • k. -i-U » i • t • -Ti ' i .sr r Citv Wavzata iHU " • A I .1 • reM... I* ‘ Date Prooertv rtccuirec _ _ _ _ _ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent paresis of lane (menth/year) PEES - conditional CSE PEPJ-ilTS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee , . . _ ~o^ —y2ct Fes — Douole Current r>pp.^ica«.ion ree *4 • $ 50,00 For each variance request with CU? application • • to S125.00 Residential accessory Use $150.00 InstitutionalCTchurc^ school, etc.) $150.00 . Guest Heuse/Guest Apartm.ents $150.00 Duple.x Credit/3ldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200,00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floocp_air Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or mere ... . Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' o- la.<es..orc ■i <1 PRD/PID - see fee schedule 02SSR APPLICATIONS _ _ _ _ $200.00 $250.00 _ _ _ _ $175.00 $ 50.00 i _ _ _ _ $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (^ consultan Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Appeals t fees) Other - see fee schedule 7 /i-I r. / 3 PS2SZKT DSE OP PROPx-^TY ConferenceT^enter Present Zoning Disnrrct ^- - - - - -- - __ _ _ _ _ Residential Present! Lse .. wy : -- --- --—^er (snecifv) conference center 4 \ 4 *w D2SCRIP-I0N OP REQUEST I^escri^e recuest in detar—.see attached 2. ISQOIRED SUBMITTALS L. Completed Ap?lica~ton ^ . owners w'thin 350' (vcu can obtainCertified Property Owners = - o. owne s w _n-n a ^ this list from Hennepin Counzv Departme... o. .—ance Center 348“3271). Pl^t Map. •__-j u.. a 1 »''p"sed sorvevor). 7e^\:--i.'/a-nd-%oposea con.ocrs, if land ilieratiir.s involve chences in^elejation^j?-_e^er.os). Ccnstroooion plan, ",;:^olVior., 'olees; lo-.eoh'e separe-.e lisO of any^oolneTpe^cnf y;7«ish Tnopified of this application. m V *5 0 POPT'^^S TaARGS DOCUMENTS OR he applicant and ? er.ember tnar your ap or been included. — —...Qa. c^cT*^ rOC — icatron. P — eas —-coertv Owner ...-s- s_g.. ,'_r___aa..-^..-, naecllcarron is non complene rr tne aocve ...-^_...a--cn ..as ’^rn^.s-i.s O— C—.enrce^ Slie-. — * — '— ■ Zl— ______ »—~—— PPLICANT’S SIGNA’i'UKE ,n*crn\ation reouirec or ne applicant herepy ° '!Ls tS c'ai acditional fie.sy (staff scuesned by the Zonrng Va7.^e-“ S' and/o'-‘unusual e.xoenses incurred ir:e not covered by crrcrnar ree -• nf on^iaticn supplied' is aooiicaticn, anc cerr----es -..a- w..- -----'j-^ V'ew or —---- , - . ; ^rui and correct no th^besu of his/her .kncw.ecge. •S ^ s» jclicant's signature ao.no..ledpes a.-.a.-ees to^this ^,L!;^ ivestigation and veri-ication Oa. wh-s - . r.er's signature Dare rrd MondTy‘of each a-nont.h. Applicants^must ^ Ls view meetings of the Planning Co.-u^ss-o.. . a'—ancements to have anable to atte.nd a scheduled "meeting, please m^<e a -a^^ ^ -horized acent attend in your place and aa^-se u..e au.xa . fice of this change prior to the meeting. m Kr vT: ■ i - i^- i.at:- ^ /i 9 f I ■• *' ^ ■n . >.* ■ir. — • DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST The Spring Hill Conference Center operated until 1988 when it ceased operations for economic reasons. Thereafter, Spring Hill Conference Center determined to sell the property in Orono and significantly reduce its operations. Ovor a lengthy period of time, Spring Hill Conference Center attempted to effectuate a sale to a similar nonprofit entity but without success. The reasons for the hoped for sale to a nonprofit were to continue the existing land use as well as to continue the function of the Spring Hill Conference Center. In 1989, Duncan Dayton and Jud Dayton began to seriously look at the Spring Hill Conference Center site in Orono with an eye toward acquiring the site. Ultimately, a deal was struck and the Dayton brothers acquired the Spring Hill property late in 1989. As an entity to hold title they established the Spring Hill Land Company Limited Partnership with Spring Hill Land Company, a Minnesota corporation, as the corporate general partner. Jud Dayton and Duncan Dayton are the two principals and are actively involved in management of this property. Jud Dayton.and Duncan Dayton herewith petition the City of Orono for a conditioned use permit for the property surrounding the conference center buildings being PID No. 25-118-23-33-0002. The conditional use permit they request is to allow the buildings and the immediately surrounding property to be used for two purposes. One .is,by the Fresh Water Foundation and the other is by the Woodridgjie Church. Both users are nonprofit corporations. The description of the uses of the Spring Hill site by the Fresh Water Foundation is attached hereto as Exhibit A. As you can see, the uses of Spring Hill by the Fresh Water Foundation are very much the same as the uses to which the conference center facility put to by Spring Hill when it was in operation.V The second user is the Woodridge Church which is an active church. Its uses of the Spring Kill site are attached hereto as Exhibit B. Again, the uses of the site are more for church and church related purposes than of being only conference center purposes, but such uses are quite similar to conference center uses. In addition, churches are permissible users of lands in Orono's Zone RR-lB-1. The Dayton brothers have held the Spring Hill Conference Center property for o’^er a year now without having been able to obtain revenue generai.ing users of it. With the property now on the real estate tax rolls, the holding costs are soaring as you would anticipate. The Dayton Brothers long-term intention for the property is to develop it at some future date. In the meantime, they wish to obtain a conditional use permit essentially permitting conference center uses similar to those to which the center had been put by its former owner and occupant Spring Hill Conference Center. .J»« V ir As you can see, Fresh Water Foundation and Woodridge Church are relatively short-term users and the revenue they will generate to Spring Hill Land Company Limited Partnership is nominal compared to the total holding cost, but nevertheless significant in reducing such costs. For ease of administration by both the City of Orono and Spring Hill Land Company Limited Partnership the applicant requests that the conditional use permit be issued to Spring Hill Land Company Limited Partnership rather than to the individual users. Neither a topographic survey nor construction plans are attached because no such work will be done. mr iW .>1^r y •mn-J '-ivr ‘■m SPRING HILL LAND COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: Spring Hill Land Company Its General Partner PI. >e7 Title: * i .7 r?.-1 ••• / \4 JJ i r* S-. ; i 3^11 g-ai<5 Itoiott lUI .-Li,n reI RUN DATC OS/22/91 BATCH 002 . : ■ it t I »- t 0 HEttCPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OMCRS LIST ; PROP AOOR ‘ ' i ONNER NAME i i TAXPAYER , .. •> NAME/AOOR •Si•<»>y.- .ri SB 2B-11S-2S 51 0002 t T 00056 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED SraiNQ HILL LAND LTD PTSP SPRINO HILL LAND LTD PTSP C/0 40 LIND4UIST A VErNtt 740 E LAKE ST HAYZATA HN 55591 . > : I ' PROP AOOR « I •i. J “ OltCR NAME♦ 1 *; TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR I ;• 't • !• . i,' • ■ I t' -': 1* t‘ » * r\ i‘ )• ' 56 25-118-25 55 0005 00625 SPRING HILL RO 0 D FLOREN A J B FLOREN DAVID A JOAN FLOREN 625 SPRING HILL RD NAYZATA »tl 55391* ■t i 56 25-116-23 34 0010 : 00036 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED BRUCE N CARLSON ET AL ; BRUCE H A CAROLINE C CARLSON f1611 22ND ST N MPLS MN ^ 55405 ► . PROP ADDR > ONNER NAME ^ TAXPAYER : \ NAME/ADDR "li' f PROP AOOR ! ^ CPMER HAIM! TAXPAYER r ‘-AND LTD PTSP * ,t NAME/AOOR \:C/0 40 LINORUIST A VETMJn t740 E LAKE ST NAYZATA m S539I " r < ■ lif; “ ■i'll!' I'ii 23 11 0001 . •! 00030 ADORESS UNASSIGNEO SPRINO HILL LAND LTD PTSP . r. ‘ '-(• IJ -'t I . , 4 i* I :1 I i . 'O':'":' > '■ -Vi il'i «, ; 1 * > ■■ ? • * ♦ * , I ■ i V I .*■ S t‘ ^ • 36 25-116-23 33 0001 00036 ADDRESS UNASSJnNED SPRING HILL LAND LTD PTSP SPRING HILL LAND LTD PTSP C/0 40 LINOqUIST A VE^tlUH 740 E LAKE ST NAYZATA HN 55391 36 25-116-25 54 0004 00591 NORTH STREAM RD B A C CARLSON BRUCE H A CAROLINE C CARLSON 591 NORTH STREAM RD HAYZATA MN 55391 36 26-118-23 44 0003 00660 SPRINO HILL RD SPRING HILL LAND LTD PTSP APRING HILL LAND LTD PTSP C/0 40 LINOQUIST A VE^tlUH 740 E LAKE ST HAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-116-23 22 0003 00755 LONG LAKE RD E F HINSTON A E C HINSTON FREDERICK HINSTON 765 SPRING HILL RD HAYZATA MN 55391 report no. PI435401 PAGE 5 36 25-116-23 33 0002 00725 SIXTH AVE N SPRINO HILL LAND LT PTSP SPRING MILL LAND LTD PTSP C/0 40 LINDQUIST A VENNUM 740 E LAKE ST HAYZATA MN 55391 38 25-118-23 54 0008 00531 NORTH STREAM RD G L HOFFMAN A S L HOFFMAN 6 L A SUSAN HOFFMAN 541 NORTH STREAM RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 26-118-23 44 0004 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGTCD SPRING HILL LAND LTD PTSP SPRING HILL LAND LTD PTSP C/0 40 LINDQUIST A VENNUM 740 E LAKE ST HAYZATA m 55391 TOTAL BATCH 002 00011 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION# TO THE BEST OF NY KNOHLEOGE AND BEUEF. \ A * J f .a ^ 1 jiATt ^1' •.of «.• f • *r s • • » f I- r I? \ } CO f. CD I J! ‘ ) • r. 5; t. A I ,1,. ■ . mm DATE: TO: SUBJECT: [V.-5V•&5-f ^mmm EXHIBIT A SPRING HILL LAND COMPANY LTD. PARTNERSHIP 445 EAST LAKE STREET SUITE #220 WAYZATA, MN 55391 - 3^ Tv March 13, 1991 Lindquist & Vennun Robert Mitchell .. <y FROM: Sharon Catton Spring Hill Center Leasing Information * .".•X i• • ‘^4 Per your request, I am sending the following information on the Freshwater Foundation and on Woodridge Church: Freshwater Foundation - Tenant information sheet and proposal. •• Woodridge Church - Letter of intent, ;ietter of proposal, Woodridge prospectus, tenant contact list and copy of conditional use permit that thr' church had submitted to the • M •City. Also, I enclosed a copy of the Spring Hill Center Complex which helps to refer to in reviewing the above proposals. •• Please let me know if you need any further information. J 5' S! SPRING HILL LTD. PARTNERSHIP PROSPECTIVE TEIJANT 2/15/91 FRESHWATER FOUNDATION H. MARTIN JESSEN (MARTY) 471-8407 arw' TT 1 v»> /,• EDUCATION DIVISION SHORT TERM 2-3 YRS. OFFICE SPACE 3,000 TO 4,000 SQ. FT. SUMMER CONFERENCE, MEETINGS JOHN LEWMAN SHOWED CENTER ON 3/4/91 JENSSEN SENT PROPOSAL ON 3/7/91 . ••t**' V * .•* • • V* , % ' •• . .> V ' . •• ' • S'. r> ^4 L- ;■ iT’*' j. #i * . * ’ * »’ * ^ * Jt kr' . . • .* . • -• . •' 4- •*'V . V . *•' *'«» . . ■ t • •/, f * >:;■ . ■ • . ••. • .• •• ■ •. * • • • •• •. • • • • r«."- ; "r- 9 , i ;• -•... ^ :: .Z.. ♦.J- ^ 2.^ ■ I / ^ r t- I- ■ m f0 m /^ES:wUc,Tei<% cf . vC ^ 1^ T © 1 • • ‘ w# • • to: from: r*; <7. 7 uy\ :^r-r^ M -*'iV • * •■ « • •.WiJ7V. c=i. !•;• - • ■•*“• •• • --~ « - •■ •v.' ! • »»»4 # A John Lewman March r, ip$i ounoation uses of sprjnq f MegtlnnPf Meetlr)g US GeoJogfcal Survey WaUr Dafa Commliie* £iiiffi£iis.snsnfl4n£s S^s^lXti. 1 per/Bar 20 "r:v£:s;“ ’'■“ Training Session IJiH* W.ich Advisory Commilio, 4 1 20 100 Lake Association Education Seminars 8 - 12 2 each 2 Metro Wetlands Forum Freshwater Boord of Directors Freshwater Committees F^shwater Academy for High School Studeni# 4 3*4 5 • 6 3 - 4/monlh 90 • too too 20.30 4 - 10 1 • 2 «tfi ••• 25 - 30 We bollevor"— If Freshwater wrr« f-K_ .w. 2 vAs ea /or services could Oe provided If desirable. • .*.• 757, i r h‘"' ;jir?n rgTTTT rom CoT~“ * 1>' pAyri » t ’• •• . • : . * •- • • di • • • •r .s - * • • \ * . ^ . ••• . • • •• . a •■'-7 -'r-v -V .• . . - •••: <'•■ • .. * •. V V ,■ •* » , -.4 . • • • • •• • • •• I ^ • V. c;A: v - \v • .? • Vi' :• . •. . WOODRIDGE. V-...;.-,.., ..CHURCH.^ ■■■•■,;: A place to belong A place to become . . . •. • •%• ^• • . * y. •• Jr • • • • r . Mr. Duncan Dayton .Spring Hill Land Co.. 445 East Lake South v •■• Suite 220 ^v'.\^v:W;;Way2aia.NW 55391. L* • ' • . • . • Dear Mr. Dayton:l..r . V -.V . ••;•■•.•.•• V.*■ *•^-vr..•: ?• At the request of your agent Mr. John M Lewman, I have enclosed a copy of Woodridge’s : letter of intent regarding the Spring Hill Conference Center. We have also enclosed a .*. . Prospectus for Woodridge Church as well as brochures and newsletters that will provide . ;,. C .some background information.; •t *. •.* C.-' •.;V V . : • * •• .• .V* . r • i' We appreciate the opponunity to present this information and offer to you and look;forward '• ;. r ■=,'•• to further discussions with your agent and yourself..) * Milo Arkema • • : . • . t *•'*. v Vi‘■• *••** .* ‘ .y,• Leadership Team Mailing Address 6630 Shady Oak Road • Eden Prairie. MN 55344 . .(612)944-8394 ^ ‘ ; / di .* • ^ / J -r »- *** 4 il ■ ir-itiM ir'': ADDENDUM A V M '.■i. Woodridge Church is an eight month group oi about 250 people (including children). Woodale Church o± Eden Praxrie started and continues to support Woodridge. We are preparing a statement ior the owner, Mr. Dayton, and would be happy to share that with you upon your request. The current attendance on Sundays is about 250 and weeknights is about 70. We would use the Conference Center Building Sunday mdrnl.ngs and Wednesday evenings for our services. We may use the Conference Center BijjiXding one other 6 hour time slot per week for classes. We want to use the Administration Building for offices and Sunday School classrooms. We have no lease arrangements lor other parts of the facility. We do have per day rates for various areas for conierences and would use the facilities for conferences under this arrangement.• •• rl Woodridge is applying for a 5 year permit to use the facility*V * We must say that Orono looks to be a wonderful community and Woodridge looks forward to becoming a giving "citizen". Thank you for your consideration of our application. -rM mm V ■ ’ ' ::: :,'-l ^ ii i \ Steve ). Michel - Broker, inc. Oricr.i'.s MN 55-^*lJ U.S.A- Ottice icl2', 593-1910 Pax (612) 591-IC51 January 26r 0.- y- ■iX\ Lit- nr. Jonn L»vman TQwi® Real estate U3U '.^nd Avenue eout.n Suite BOO rtinneapolis. Minnseota Pb40i Dear ttr. Lewman: =1= -inten-" by my client, Woodridcj® Cnurch, to This letter enell eerve as ' building on a part time baaio and 1,... -ne •I'r-.mary Conisreno. we ei.o pre.ent the -AShinietratlon' buiiO-nq on - ; revenuee ior your property ideas to essist you in genereting -u..he. r^^^ interest, et eoee With a minimum output on you.^ Duildinga and underlying time, to negotiate an option lo Mr. Dayton in land as veil ae land buildings and along County Road 6. his development plans) north c. ^ S! Day?on's ideas 'lor the My client's desire is to _ _ Monericiai useo that can beproperty e^d'-Urth^re .^^^ur.iiy -ed th.t Ch .e discovered regarding his properw/. «. ere .were thet the -ijuiness oi the Jor.“rr::t"nnar:iHrn iy^:«":: :srer"^hto the tolloving requirements, they a lease for the property. into CCwUPAMCY Vfoodridge wants to begin occupancy Ap. -1 # REauiKtnt.MTS Rent * * •* « 1st year *2nd year 3rd year s INCLUSIONS 1.o II * * mm use of the Administration building "* _ the Conierence Rooms building p"; HZ 1. to «e»n. „„ end one other (0 '-"*/*"°''trno?'‘n.ore thin'72 hours. rti:r‘IIIn''Iii«Iir “.I<^ wednesdsy. Jcn.Pui-5 —is shali be SirdriII’Sr:lnir_"Iot ‘lI=lu£nI s.t^ B... Bent. III'tMcIudin, telephone it'a rented areas) and utii-.i^a service >. >,e .ISO request the option •;^!r:”2„';rt “e'abo%:°'‘ Friday or Saturday evening, in ad^.-ion •‘cVm.Tit'n'vj/ L.-.ts/):’ lAflkMi ##' **r»onai Propartyi -ioodridpe anaii h®v« tha privilege oi using peraonai property In ihe buildings it is occupying. ipeciiic items included but not limited to; telepnone system, audio/video equipment, copier, office equipment and furniture including deaKs, partitions, bcoKcases, typevriters, cabinets, tc. > kitchenette items (coffeemaker, etc. ), and lounge :urniture. n the same manner, personal property shall also be available to e used in rooms vhlch are rented on a per day basis. 'ne grand piano snail be moved into tne large conference room. oodrldge shall maintain and repair ail above mentioned personal rooerty in at least condition it is received, normal wear and ear excluded. signage r an is needed within zoning code on County Road fa. ,gn IS needed near the access door to the Administration .ng. • ary signs are needed during services/conferences at roadside, g lot, etc. OTHER PKOPERTV USEAGE ^ .dge wants to set up per day rates for useage oi rooms (and ai property) not included in the main lease. ing Rooms/Lounge Area (including restrooms) .*linor useage of Serving Room and Oining Room " sSO. 00. Ila^or useage of Kitchen appliances, etc. and Dining Room ~ SIOO.00. t Sleeping Wing (includes lounge useage). Sleeping Room (includes linen useage) sib. 00 plus laundry and cleaning charges. -t Lounge - 830 *. Sleeping Wing (inlcudes lounge useage). Sleeping Room (includes linen useage) 815.00 plus laundry and cleaning charges. *t House (includes linen useage) S30.00 plus laundry and cleaning c.harges. n Lounge (including Rest Rooms/Library) sSO.00 dge snail provide labor for clean up and laundering under the ision of fir. Dayton's property manager. OPTION TO RE.NEW .dge proposes s 3 year option to renew this lease with the only^ * being gross rent shall increase to: Year 1-s , Year , Year 3-s ^ ' .} y a ( % t • / V fp-: I; *;• ■^’' ’im-'f; Lv--U-f^' m jw fc'V I > 1' l1 ■i ^- • ^.0 ■.i-.■ «1 ## SPRING HILL LAND COMPANY LTD. PARTNERSHIP WOODRIDGE CHURCH CONTACT LIST 1/29/91 NAME POSITION ADDRESS.TEL^ John Lewinan Leasing Agent Towle Real Estate 341-4444 Mike Brady Leasing Agent Steve J. Michel 593-1916 Broker, Inc. 591-1051 F 3925 Orleans Ln. No. Mpls. Mn 55441 Milo Arkema Leadership Team of Woodridge Church (Accountant) 941-8323 0 9*a-32?C H Paul Johnson senior Pastor Woodridge Church 944-8394 '/ V 1 1 I i I 4 i k i i ■yv*i JL . -1 To:Mayor Peterson & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From; Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator April 11, 1991 #1638 City of Orono, 1285 Brown Road South Variances - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (A) - Accessory structure proposed on property that does not sustain a principal structure. The structure is merely a storeje facility and contains no offices or use that suggests a principal use. 0^Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (02 - Variance required to allowed footprint area for oversized accessory structure. 0-1.99 acres (property consists of 38,802 s.f.) Individual Structure Allowed = 1,000 s.f. Proposed = 4,800 s.f. (6-7 acres needed to support 4,800 s.f. structure) Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 - Lot coverage. " Allowed Structural Coverage » 5,802 s.f. (15% of 38,802 s.f.) No variance required. -4 * Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) - Setback variances sought to RR-IB standards. Existing Setbacks Proposed Variances (see Exhibit F) Cty Rd 146 -1'2"25'* • Crystal Ave O’10' Propect Ave 130'125'-y West Side 108*110' Lot Line List: of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit P Exhibit G Exhibit H Application Notice/Property Owners List Plat Map Existing Survey Conforming Site Plan Proposed Site Plan Floor Plan Elevations f ^ J •i.: » • Zoning File #1638 April Hr 1991 Page 2 of 3 Review of Application - The existing storage facility on the subject property is in a serious deteriorated and hazardous state. The City proposes the installation of a "temporary" storage facility, 50'x96'. The accessory structure is a pole barn (review Exhibits G and H). The structure is classified as temporary because of the plans to relocate the Public Works facility to another more suitable site. The structure will be used for the storage of sand and salt and other equipment at a new site at same unknown date. The City is unable to determine how temporary the use of this structure will be as it depends upon acquisition of a more suitable site for a Public Works facility and funding that has not been determined as of this date. The structure will have a permanent foundation (continuous footings) the storage structure will not require the installation of an approved fire suppression system because structure is less than 5,000 s.f. In fact, the Public Works Director felt that he had r.o option as far as selecting a larger facility because of the increase cost of sprinkling on this site ($150,000 or more). Review Exhibit E, the structure is shown meeting all required street setbacks. The employee parking lot wo'uld be reduced by two thirds. The current open yard storage area is reduceo and the much needed mixing area for salt and *sand would be lost. The City must ask for approval of the variances noted eUbove in order to maximize limited use of space, minimise inpact on site created with relocating uses on site and minimize co*’ts to taxpayers as use is temporary. The City has explored the rental of storage areas- in adjacent cities, but the cost of rental for one year well exceeds the cost of purchase of a temporary storage facility (especially a facility that will be used for storage of other material5 and equipment at a future date). Council did not accept the rental of storage area as a viable option. Options of Action ** Approval as proposed requiring approval of the variances noted above, based on the following hardship: 1, The property is surrounded by roads on three sides and small residential lot at the west side - inability to increase area of site. ‘ • .i 2. Shape of property. 3. Temporary aspect of use as structure will be moved to a more appropriate site at a later date. m .-I :■>k --m •i i --------li ihiiSinrhitif- Zoning File #1638 April 11, 1991 Page 3 of 3 4. Approval of variances will result in minimum impact on existing improvements and allow functional use of the limited site. Denial. Denial based on the position that it is not appropriate for the City to grant variances for either a permanent or temporary use, especially since the temporary nature of this use has not been defined as far as the period of time in use. If this structure is to be used by the City at a later date, then it may be appropriate for the City to acquire a more suitable site for the installation of the pole barn as the pole barn will be installed with a full foundation. The Public Works Department may be given an option to select a larger facility if site selected has municipal water available. In addition, it would be a savings to the City because there would be no need to reinstall structure at a later date. •* .» • 'kv- !*■ H- * *• ' . •# * J m 0 m 1.m. m I*'’. ,wm -• •1^ 4 1J I 9 f rfrt life OP OP.t)NO - VARIANCE APPLICATION IniV.ial Application Fee $175.00 (.'550.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100,00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) /I 4 PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address yf) ^ oujh Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Phone (home) r\ I ''•y \ t'-h 'r' (ittjy Phone (work) Address: P^o^jl (j>(o OWNER (if different than applicant) Name /lw-tv-.J?_ _ _ City: rZip: Phone (home)_ _ _ •• • •_ _ _ Phone (work) Address: - y City:Zip:I Date Property Acquired (month/year) t I h.- .I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land w PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present (U< - i&It, Use of Propertv P. LLr. St'nnt.it & /Residential DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail; vST^t/ ^ ")na V --------------------------------------------------- I.—. Other (specify) Estimated Construction Cost $ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot width Setback Variances (_ Other vg /-z-g. n^ Front- Hardcover Side Rear) • cA^ y HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: /Oa.vg,'*. / - - - /?-«7 A^aUs>_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _!_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMI^ALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Gcvt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8*5'*xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8Ji"xll"). S)cetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8>i"xll"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application.. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. • **The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above Information has not been included.■ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fee% (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the infoi^ation supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. • ’ Applicant's Signature Date / ONNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning CoasuLssion and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. % I I = 1 t V*' CITY OP ORONO - NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold Public Hearings in the Council Chambers at 1275 South Brown Road on Monday,^ April 15, 1991 for the purpose of j^Qviewing the following land use applications? 1, f631 Charles and Ann Hommeyer have filed a renewal variance for lot area for the property located at 475 Linden Avenue for the purpose of constructing a new residence. 2. #1632 Steve Martin has filed a renewal conditional use permit for duplex use of the property located at 3890 Shoreline Drive. 3. #1633 Andrew McDermott of 2702 Walters Port Lane seeks approval of a rear setback variance for construction of a 3-season porch addition to the rear of the residence structure. 4. #1634 James and Joan Maus of 3700 Bayside Road seek approval of a side setback variance for a proposed two-story addition to the east side of the existing residence. 5. #1635 John O'Sullivan and Erwin Smith of 2420 Shadywood Road seek approval of a side setback variance for a proposed storage/utility addxtxon to the east side of the existing commercial structure. » • 6. #1636 Steve Tibbetts, current owner of 1810 Shadywaod Road, seeks . approval of after-the-fact hardcover and setback variances for deck additions and installation of an access drive. ' 7. #1637 Spring Hill Land Company, owner of the former Spring Hill Conference Center located at 725 6th Avenue North, seeks approval of a conditional use permit for a church use of portions of the exxstxng facility and a variance that would allow the present profxt-makxng corporation to use the facility for conference use on a temporary basis. ^8. #1638 * City of Orono seeks approval of setback variances and a variance to rhe allowed area for oversized accessory structures for the property located at 1285 Brown Road South for the purpose of xnstallxng temporary storage/maintenance structure on the residential property. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. The meetxng starts at 7:00 p.m. Written comments are solicited. Plans are avaxlable for review in the City offices, by appointment. City of Orono By; Planning Commission To be published the week of April 1, 1991. Jean^i K. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator *ij»» - ■ CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS, r,:| ) CITY OP ORONO ) V-r 1, Jamie Bosma, <xf the City of Oronor Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1638, was mailed to the attached list of property owners . In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 28th day of March, 1991. mi' KjV*' ■Bi.fi . V j:;: ';jr ifii mM y' ^ mm V' y -* '^y'y'J m'-. r^-il V ,• ikL " • ' ' ' ^ %y '«*«! ♦i * . > ■ . ii W-" ¥ ‘if ^y fvAV’" ' 5' -; ■« I.- [f. , St*':’- ^..■y-yy'^y'-:rifSyr.,. M. /T>t Ja^TeBoima ^ * .i ) •■ M ■<.* /?- ''•'vfH. t. :■ :• i/' ■m m M£3B b 10-117-23 31 0066 Monica & Michael Brown 1241 Brown Road S Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23 31 0022 Craig & Judy Christensen 1251 Brown Road S Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23 31 0048 Keith & Roxanne Westbrook 233 16th Ave N Hopkins, MN 55343 10-117-23 31 0049 Douglas Malignon P.O. Box 97 Long Lake, MN 55356 10-117-23 31 0050 Philip Kaley 1395 Brown Road S Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23 31 0051 Barbara Garcia P.O. Box 114 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 10-117-23 31 0052 Gregory & Julianne Peterson 1355 Arbor Street Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23 31 0053 Mabel Belt P.O. Box 162 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 10-117-23 31 0054 J E Sutherland 4865 Main Street E .‘apl Plain, MN 55359 10-117-23 31 0055 Enrigue Libatique P.O. Box 139 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 10-117-23 31 0099 L S Kennen 6 J M Kellar 8434 Morgan Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55347 10-117-23 31 0056 Doris Eisenkramer 2140 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23 31 0013 Godfrey Bergquist P.O. Box 125 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 10-117-23 31 0016 Mark & Tina White 2150 Prospect Ave Crystal Bay, MN 55323 10-117-23 31 0017 Patricia Drummond 2160 Prospect Ave Crystal Bay, MN 55323 10-117-23 31 0014 , G F Bergquist P.O. Box 125 Crystal Bay, MU 55323 10-117-23 31 0015/35 -V Arlene Hoppe y’ 1295 Arbor Street Crystal Bay, MN 55323 10-117-23 31 0028 Steven & Jill Benson 1290 Arbor Street Wayzata, MN 55391 :• •• • m ^ 10-117-23 31 0029 Mark Lamontagne 1270 Arbor Street Wayzata, MW 55391 10-117-23 31 0030/31 Cary Burton P.O. Box 22 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 10-117-23 31 0034 Jay & Barbara Wood P.O. Box 43 Wayzata, MN 55391 ■i ' 10-117-23 11 0002 Dakota Rail Inc C/0 Thomas Lovett 1400 First Bank Place N Minneapolis, MN 55402 ■i •ocf iV) l»i F CTI ’««*.;«> ^ .i<g f»*i QAA wttn: use*, la t-7^^jCx r. fii i»< /• .*•;» ‘•*'**" «.V ^ •i* *: ______ »•*»>•* V-u'T ttflV-*|/ ^ f na a*4 n;<ait uru &%?rr3in*ra»r —r iiti me f TOO {«* a m ^ M 11___ KAiB rm ti A m JkJa.7^ ss.’rr.sf* &■ •________________>jjO» ^ fiA3 IITA |A"«IU. Ui.F.taontatfos «i 1 hi «i ;s . i # • 1 A "A .<rt-A_____i• < C4SC-rF.aucsmrsnio 4 ENOWALL SECTIOM 00 NOT SCALI i • Ti* ^.*>x»r CA».tt — •—4*1^ -ia* fil'ltA J* () ‘V**"*«*^*«i * t*.*A ■•K,«P r,.»o uxi *“a F l^rj iieria Cuc^.'ilA Sjk M jF « i MUtA \) a iOO IjA !aA gVfC ?/l»?a ftAVI I f.V ta a : aw t«t ' Aat> J«TU IV.MF exAf. f cn irtjOA fue« (IT masTi failQrnyji .. f«;n«c us TO nn 0/i 6*. CUI?. |r*rAi • *Mk » t-r»i • tSMST-AaBi, SSAUAX 901k ^ \1 L SIDEWALL & TRUSS SECTION’ op NOT S(iALS i/N— /.' A Ui / <o.,«« -Vv 44* WIDC POST PRAME-30# FIA:X F AV^I c K a I CO. i^orlv* r>.^ ‘ V4T^C % QwsTfMsBUil MASS ATt ®“T>-jt» Ms«a fi- f-• * ♦ Ciyy OF ORONO ZONIHG FILE #1618400 Cmtai°Bay? MN 55323 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 4‘73—7357 Dci'ts of Notices March 22f 1991 TO; William F. Pucel COPIES TO; 5705 Evergreen Lane Plymouth, MN 55442 _ _ _ _ TYPE OF APPLICATION; Sketch Plan PRD/Subdivision _ _ _ _ DATE OF MEETING; 3-18/20-91 VOTE: No action required of the Planning Commission Planning Conmixssion recoainiends the following; Applicant is asked to advise Zoning Department if you wish your sketch plan application rescheduled before the full body of the Planning Commission at their April 15, 1991 meeting. If it would be of assistance, staff would be happy to send you the rough draft copy of the minutes of the sketch plan review before the Planning Commission. Staff will await your decision concerning the rescheduling of your application before the April Planning Commission meeting and if you desire copies of the draft of the Planning Commission minutes. Isv I?«i i iH p'- ‘.-wy y • ; •• , ' ■ ' .1 ’M-mM >.<- A ->■' ; S;i\/ b _____g^tatui Mayor Peterson & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusthr Building s Zoning Administrator April 5, 1991 Subject: #1618 William F. Pucel, Baldur Park Road - Sketch Plan Review .4*.- At the March 20th meeting of the Planning Commission, tb'- applicant was afforded an opportunity to bring the sketch Plaj* review before the Planning Commission at their April 15th meeting. It was hoped that the full 7 members would be in attendance for comment. The Notice of Planning Commission Action repeated the same offer to the applicant. Applicant has contacted staff and asked to be rescheduled before the Planning Commission. Members are asked to advise staff after receipt of your packets delivered on Wednesdayr April 10 if you wish to be recopied on this item for inclusion in your Friday packets. Isv ■jf. ■. Bsmm ssm ■:-;v n y rt- m i- • f¥W¥'T f •t'-' ' . ■ U4 ■ > ' w’. ai5£;i‘^-L * -'^3m k y & ■ ' y V I' 5- ■» ' •m yMBm. -V ■ ! I’ -b niauc EButxwBM - iiso p.a. 1. AaaadiMBt to Zoning Cod* A. TcBporary sign! in eniurcinl dintrlctn >. Municipal facilitiaa of naighbocing citiaa within Orono City Linita ACnOM ITWB . . ^Aaviaw of thaaa Itoaa will conMnea prior to or batwaon lohadalad Public Baaringa. m 51- - Hi 2.*1131 Charlaa ( Ana BoMayar - 47S Lindan Avaaua - Varianca - Public Baarlag 3.11(33 Stava Martin - 31(0 Shoralina Drive - Banawal Conditional Oaa Famlt - Public Baaring 4a (1133 Aadraw McDatnott - 3702 Maltari Port Lana - Varianca - Public Baaring 5.11(34 Jaawa ( Joan Maun - 3700 Baytlda Bond - Varianca - Public Baaring <a (1(3S John O'Snlllvan I Brwln Saith - 2420 Ihadywood load - Varlanca/CoMarclal lita Plan Aaviaw - Public Baaring 7a *1(30 Stava Tibbatta - 1(10 Shadywood toad - Aftar-tba-Pact Varlancaa - Public Baaring s.(1(37 Spring Bill Land Coapany - 72S (tb Avenua Bortb - Conditional Oca Paralt/Varianca - Public Bearing ».(1(31 City of Orono - 1215 Brown toad tooth - Varlancaa - Public Baaring BXXrai FLAM 10. mil ■AViBMS Milllaa Purcal - laldur Park - Pin - Subdivlalon .mm \j0 - .—J/1 b aaUJ-J •" W - / - -ipii- . ■ it». c t- ADUnOMAL IHW 11. tola of Planning Coaviasion - Oiacoaaion 13. Planning Coniaaion - ----------- 1**1 Stratagic Plan 13. Planning Conaiaaion approval of ainutaa of Narob II and 30, 1*11 aaatinga. 14. Planning Ceaaaaaion to aalaet a rapraaantatlva to attand Hay 13, 1**1 Mating of tha Council. ‘•g'-v Certificate of Survey for Andrew McDermott of Lot I. Block I and Outlot 2, Ualters-Port Hennepin County, Minnesota I her-'by certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of Lot I. Bloik I; Outlot 2, together with a nonexclusive easement for Ingress and egress over Outlots 1 and 3, all in Mailers-Port, according to the recorded plat thereof, The East boundary line of said plat is marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case NO. 14546, and the location of an existing house, walk, docks, driveway and two power poles. It does not purport to show any other improvemenls or encroachments. COFFIN I GRONBERr,. INC. Scale: ; ffisV : 4-29-87 r . 40* Iron marker Judicial Landmark Spot elevation nark 5. Gronberg nn. LtC. Ho.12/55 Engineers, Land Surveyors. Planners Long Lake, Minnesota EUlvATIOU~ StAt-6 1s».\-0 ‘ 'gr^^^uE-'C<^.'i~icrkr stftui ye-'.i'-o* iUggrW ■ s<^wje. Zfc'vi’-o’ hAA.-T*c.W^ «V\‘Vn»*^C-»-a So«^»T C rrc^^^JBL tA.'.ufrrer«.5 fc,; c fwi:" ■ ^ ^ . r Wm-'-- % Ji!i» -m, 'ritlat.Jib. m,- 't.. \ \ xzz\ \ \ Erxss.-rM^Co ^cj> u KiL:xsiCtnc. ;kI a -r-—,_.- / 1/ 1/ 1'^ VMTw Aec.m^.% “:h \V \ \ \ t C.-T CONC. ILK. i| C.-«' COMC. iUC. 80XS CONC. rWTG. £!_JUGDLnSU«.-l. \ ■^tew Uf'AS'tT^ 9 C.-12* coc. e ^ 1/ voi->f vy.fa.. / -v ---- I zzzz O'--a n ~7M7_Zi/ VAbit^sSCM ffto>c»nv4<» gb'-O.' Vd4^' \ g^' E \ \ \ \ \ \ X ? « vie-'vj ^:x>KJCZJErre; Ev:itfrisiCtf Or-MCKC^ ^*_oCX- | • L ler-N-. < g ^rr -y ^^O ITtet:^r\KU3 ^ue>Aj «5rt3C#=» ■i'^v : . .^ *. Wll-u f?B«VA4L^ h- SS-- ■'’ '3—I VHil' '■ ' ‘'t: :i ■'•;'■ -00' • •‘1’,..i..- ,w ' 'I-i . . ?I ,•t ... PLAT OF SURVEY FOR THE CITY OF ORONO IN THE SW1/4 OF SECTION IO-nr-23 : ' /rSFV i / r\‘ / ^ /i i. 'M' V . __________________________.... ■ J eorn.r of Mid IterUiM.t quarUr of th« Souti,u.«t ‘ Morth—t qu.rtgr gf thg sJuthw.gt qw.rUr . dl.?*n,.’ .. t i V tu iMt to the point of beglnnlnt' ot the property belne Jescrlb^lj thenoe Horth peruUel with the .West line i ■ ■ , ie • true and correct repreaar.tatlon oC a aunrey of the bounlarlaa of that aert of the Southwest quorUr of SapUon 10, Township 117 Barth, Jh.n«e 23 Meat of thf< Jth ‘ i‘V SU feet to the point of beglnnlnt' of th _ _ _ ^ feot, iienw^ieirt'Mwirel'wTtirthe V-t'i' Southwest quarUr a dlaUnce of 2 feett thenoe Borth pareUel with >i,iV .••*4 »e#t llM a dlaUnee of U7.665 feetj thence Beat perallel with eeld South 11m t<r » point 52 feet Ueat- 1 •vuur.. r*eai. angjioe iTop ir» waterif nj iniy penllel with aald lMet*rly right-of-way lid ^rtheaet quarter of the Southweet quarter m4 ii e — A# at. ^ M___a ^ iMt pareu.l -lU th. south Une cf s^Md ------------- ^ |W^WV«a| ui«1 Un« to «i point M ft lioft drftwn pftr«ll«i with Um ictith Uoft ridht-of-wiy line to an Inturaectlon vlt'i a Hue drawn Bast pareUal with the South Una ef aild "" “■ .. ■ alt'rlalMp aaoroaahMnta froa'er o6 e«ld land. ■ f■orthaaat quarter of the SouthvMt quarter hat heed aseuaed » sUklng, as Indicated on tiie a bora plat. . , jiBo to tbo point of baglBnlng, ■J. onuw'I, oDFfit 00., wc. .)*V i!*•*> * 50'fa.tf ■ V. ■ , fi? '• -*-1S t«4 '.t\ Miitfi V -j.*' ' *v. , . ^rdon 1, Coffin Itai; ■r.'ESCI >} i Hark S. Oponbarf Bag, hn.12755 Und Sureayors and fOeanera ; Uwig Uaka^ Htlut«aota ■I I htrctgr Mrtlf/ that thla it a tr\>« ind corr-;rt r«pre3<nitatloiv ul' a 8urv<i> ul' tl.u l«utKikrl«( Uiat ;«irt of Uw Norttiaaai <)uartar of tlia SouthMoat mnrter of Sactlon IC, Townahlp 117 tijrth, 23 Wti>t of th« 5th friMi|«l Mrldtan, daaartiail at roMwnctni. it a point on tha 'kaat line <>r kulJ MorUiaaat qiiurtwr of tli« SvuUi> «aat q<iartar dlatant 5D.6S) faat liorth froai tha Seuthwoat conier of aalJ Horthaaat ^UBrUr ar Um Soutfcvaai faartari tliaaea kiai parailal wlUi tha South lino ct said Horthaait quartar oT Um Suuthwact quirtar a dlatanM •f 913 root to tha paint of teelmin« or tha propartjr toinc daaerlbodi thanra NorUi paitiUal with tha Uaai Una •r paid MaHliaaat quartor of tha Seuthwait quarter a diatanao of 70,635 loeti thanca iiaat lamiUal with tha •ovth Him of aatd Nortlmaat quarter of tha SowUiwaat iiuartar a diaUnra of 2 feati thanca Kurth («rallal with •aid Vaat lino a dlataneo of 117.665 faatt thanca Cast porallol with aaltJ South Una to a ^«lnt 52 foat baat- •rly inaaurad at rlcht ai^laa fron tha Uortariy rlcht-of^wa/ Una of tha Burlington Mortharn Itailraadi thanca •outherljr |«t«llal with aald Waaiarly rtcht-af-wa> lino to a tolnt oa a Una driun (laralVl with tha South llnu •f aiid Hotthaast quarter of Um Southweat |uaitor iirl C37.925 rant Nort':, ;:>-aBiu'0(l U.q ^Mst liuo o5 kuid BsrUioi.st '<* il'o :icttthvoft -lutrtcr Tr r. V- C c-.irr^ir -*1: KV r'I.eatt ,'«irt^i r Uia .’>''jth.o8t quartor; thincu Eact I'lnllal with said S-uth lino tr t-ild V-ttorly rlitlil-tif-uiiv IJiwj ‘h'K.co Jtl. t1> .i-jiq, •aid Uarterljr rl(ht-or-wajr Una *o an ir.turructlon kl*.!. u U:.- Jmvr Euul a;*..'. Uk u'.!. Una of I'lld itorthenrt quorter of t)ia Southwest qiairUr Trot the pclr.t of l..04li.i.lna': th-jneo Uaat aluiHf saia laat«descritud |Mrull>,l Itrq to tl. j point -.T fcacinnlnt;, And of tha laeailen at all hulldlnea thereon, and all vlalhlo anereaelUBanta from or on said land. Ihr purpaaae of thin aurtajr, tha hast Una of tha RarUivast quarter of the Bouthwaat quartar haa loan aaaunad to b> tha Una no aotabliohad hr occupation and atakine, aa Indicdtad on tha atova pUt. COFTWI CSRONBEIW. MC tealaI into I • I I inch ■ 50 feat 4>IE-B4 ,r-r-ff Iron aiirhar LLiJoo h. CofUn^^^^^tp . Lo. CtCl lark *J. iiruriL>.ri; H»C. |u.l>V55 Uiiid bui-«a/ura aiut I'taiiuura UiiiC toka, hIriiMMuta mi:f % wwm: :U '3*: 1,1 j; :■ " : .:^^ .-'fw A p —I I /i5fH.U.Tj I |?^l L&>' •I I I ■■ L--J L---- r----------ir K^AD <BfmOE)L J 1' roi-i PiCKrUP 15^ TO»J PICK* UP -------------il________i 1 -------------- * V4 TWJ I PICK - UP I -ir T II ^ -n^f j I I PICK-OP ______IL.--J a; 6 r~ I T<J5KJ PICK- UP L ‘“"rr I' 11 -JL _ -------------- TPACtDP Lf^L6ai.l [ •BACK Hoc ! I -T, 1 TPfJ PICK - I P y *± r nr ------I- - -i^" TKmr ewD I i-cAoee-. I |- -----------I.J -----------------T| h DL>MP TRUCK j I DUMP tP.UcK | ______I. -«4 J M.h ■j;: M MV OiTI discrirtiom • V <\li £jQV\P. «oTDgy\cS ^ 'BLDtS. for: Cli-TY C>F^ DROK)0 *T= c3i^^NJO. Mkl. CClester ^mms BUILDING SYSTEMS SZTi'^a^saSi P^ffN iT: DATE: s/iiAi CHECKED BY: Tmo' JOB NUKBUi FACE or I ^ -WT