Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
01-22-1991 Planning Packet
CITY OP ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, JANUARY 22, 1991 7:00 P.M. 1275 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - Mayor Barbara Peterson ATTENDANCE - SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS - 7:00 p.m. 1. #1612 Christopher Dale & Geri Lee Paulson, 4085 6 4105 Watertown Road - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement 7:30 p.m. 2. #1615 Gary Mroz and Kenneth Hopkins, 59 Ferndale Green - Preliminary Subdivision 3. #1616 Gary Mroz & Kenneth Hopkins, 59 Ferndale Green Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing ACTION ITEMS 4. #1570 Chuck Downey, 2665 Casco Point Road “ Conditional Use Permit ~ Continuation of Public Hearing S.#1600 Rick's Super Valu, 3333 Shoreline Drive - Variance/Commercial Site Plan Review - Continuation of Public Hearing 6. #1604 Clair Rood, 2215 Kenwood Way - Conditional Use Permit - Continuation of Public Hearing 7. #1605 Dr. Richard Lindstrom, 1065 West Ferndale Road - Variances - Continuation of Public Hearing P'8. #1611 Bruce & Camille Curtiss, 1920 Fagerness Point Road After-the-fact Variances - Public Hearing i-. : 9. #1613 Jensen Homes Inc., 315 Tonkawa Road Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing vl.10. #1614 Jack Rhode, 1690 Shadywood Road - Renewal Variance - Public Hearing SKETCH PLAN REVIEWS - 11. #1610 Gloria Gilmer, 25 Orono Orchard Road North - Proposed Subdivision 12. #1617 Marc Whitehead, 1220 Lyman Avenue - Proposed Subdivision 13. #1618 William F. Pucel, 1350 Baldur Park Road Proposed Varieuices CITY OP ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUBSDAYr JANUARY 22, 1991 7:00 P.M. ADDITIONAL ITEMS ~ 14. Planning Commission to select time and date of special meeting to complete review of proposed amendments originally scheduled for Planning Commissions* review at the December 17, 1990 meeting. 15. Comments of the Planning Commission's representative at Council meeting of December 10, 1990. 16. Planning Commission approval of Planning Commission minutes of November 19, 1990 meeting. bC;' 17. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend February 11, 1991 meeting of the Council.> 18. January 23, 1991 - 7:30 p.m. - Highway 12 Workshop. Planning Commission Members are encouraged to attend. ADJOURNMENT m III h . PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO I f\J[':> MEETING DATE \/JJO MI PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NA'IE OR NUI4BER &. m rm^ : ■ • m ■ / To:Mayor Peterson 6 Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson /. Prom:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: January 10, 1991 #1612 C. Dale/G. Paulson and J. Sawchuk - 4085 Watertown Road and 4105 Watertown Road - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance- Section 11.05 - Definition 24 - Lot area minimum. Each lot shall contain the minimum area required for each proposed lot as prescribed in the zoning chapter of the City Code. In rural zones not served by sanitary sewer, each lot must contain a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land exclusive of wetlands, public and private rights-of-way, vehicular or pedestrian easements, . . . The proposed subdivision requires approval of the creation of an access easement over portions of an existing driveway that serves one of the properties involved in the lot line rearrangement. The owner of the property granting the easement should be advised that this area cannot be included as dry buildable area in a future subdivision. The properties are located in a 5 acre minimum lot zone and the property from which the easement is to be granted does not contain 10 acres in area. This wc»uld only be relevant to the owner if zoning densities were increased and the zoning district remained rural (not served by sewer). Section 11.05 - Definition 66 - Class I subdivision required for lot line rearrangement and creation of private easement. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit P Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Application Property Owners List Plat Map Applicant's Attorney's Addendum Survey of Lot Line Rearrangement 1976 Deed Survey, 4105 Watertown Road Comprehensive Survey/Site Plan of Both Properties Septic Inventory Map, 4105 Watertown Road 4105 Watertown Road A. ■L Lot Area: Required ■ 5 Acres Existing * Approximately 388,000 s.f. or 9+ acres (.2 acres wetlands) Proposed * Approximately 386,650 s.f. (reduction by area of lands to be deeded at 1,350 s.f.) ♦Proposed ■ Approximately 383,975 s.f. (area exclusive of access easement) J i :1 Zoning File #1612 January 10, 1991 Page 2 B.Lot Width: Required = 300' Existing « 192.67' Proposed = 182.67' Existing Variance = Proposed Variance = 107.33' 117.33' or or 35% 39% * Easement area is excluded from dry buildable for rural zoned property. 4085 Watertown Road A.Lot Area: Required = 5 acres Existing = Approximately 28,000 s.f. or .64 acres Proposed =* 29,350 s.f. (additional 1,350 s.f. of deeded area) B. Lot Width: Required Existing Proposed 300’ 70’ 80' Review of Application - Please review applicant’s attorney's addendum. Exhibit D. In 1976 the original owners of 4105 attempted to deed the corridor along the east side of the property that was to be taken over an existing drive that served the residence at 4085 Watertown Road. The property owners were not aware that subdivision approval was required of the City. The deed was accepted by the County for filing, monies were exchanged, but the official plat maps of the County never reflected the subdivision because the City denied the division. The forme- property owners failed to apply for subdivision in 1981, the year the deed was filed. The property at 4085 is currently in the process of being sold to Dale and Paulson. A recent survey of the property revealed that the majority of the drive still remained within 4105 Watertown Road (Exhibit E). The owner of 4105 and the new owners of 4085 have filed the subdivision application seeking approval of the lot line rearrangement of the land couidor originally deeded in 1976 and of a new private easement. Issaes for Consideration Lot line rearrangement - If the lot line rearrangement is to be approved, a lot width variance would be required as set forth above. The property has less than 10 acres in area and could not be subdivided based on the current standards. The property at 4085 only can benefit by the lot line rearrangement. No setback variances would be required for the structures on 4105 as the principal structure is located at the west side of the parcel. a' B:' * '* . Zoning File #1612 January 10, 1991 Page 3 Refer to Exhibit H. There is no impact on the existing drainfield area within 4105 (Exhibit I). Unfortunately, the additional area to be acquired by 4085 would not be suitable for on-site septic expansion as the entire area is predominantly used for the access drive. Creation of Private Basement As already noted, the area of the easement would be excluded from the dry buildable area if the property remains rural. The granting of the easement area will have no impact on the property at 4105. Note that there is no impact on required setbacks from the west line of the easemnt corridor. If the subdivision of a lot line rearrangement is to be approved, a width variance must be granted. Planning Commission may consider some of the findings already noted by staff above. A condition of the subdivision approval shall be the legal combination of Parcels B & C (refer to Exhibit J). Isv I ■ IT 11 riii^ ^ ^ iCITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address_ Identification Number (P.I.D.) 3/ //^ 2 3 uw ^ 4oSS' IDa'ki^'h^h f\‘^'r,rx-. U‘l » I UMWIfW Property Please check one - Property •rrrrrvt t r X abstract or torrens?n f rr*j >•' ^ CU) 1 f“LTTi‘ U j ?W’-M V 'U i.1^ V « w •rA /w> K.' • VV' I tiiraiix I wu -• i C-CTT:*!Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT Phone (home) "2-0^0 Neune (Jl _____________ Phone (work) Cltv= Zip: j2/o.5/?{: different than applies Neune (^-etr-t u fset^ Phone (home) HOWNER (if di^fergnt, than applicant) _ __ _ _ _ Phone (work) taU 1 tv; oAddress: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (attach list if more than one) Zip : rr-j57 EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels r‘-'T Present Use (check)Residential; no, of units Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Zoning District PROPOSAL X Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density:Units per Acres Minimum Lot Size:Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check)Residential Other (specify) W. a MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE Pp^IMINARY APPLiCATI 1. 2. 3, 4. Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Cer€ificat?"^ Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal pi . Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) y Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) $150.00 250.00 250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential)300.00 + 20.00/Lot Pinal Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay al^ add^ional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature Date // - 2^ ^ Date /('2J ^0 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. • iWwiVih-iti r RUN DATE 11/21/90 BATCH 002 v; PROP AODR (Mr^R NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP ADOR OtlER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADOR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR •I « * *r V- * #. . ■* ! ‘ I, ■IF’ ■ ■ # . • "" '.'r r f ; r ■ • t ’ f;- 38 31-118-23 14 0007 04100 ' HATERTO»OI RD FRANK KOKESH ET AL FRANK KOKESH 4100 HATERTOfM RO MAPLE PLAIN MN, 55359 38 31-118-23 41 0003 04045 HATERTQItl RD EARL N DORN ETAL EARL N OORN 4045 NATERTOHN RO MAPLE PLAIN FM 55359 ii I '' .» ‘ \ 38 31-118-23 41 0008 04125 HATERTONN RO H R A H E PLAIK MICHAEL R A MARY E PLANK 4145 HATERTOFM RO MAPLE PLAIN HN 55359 I. * *i, k < I' r;t • I. ’ i- HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OFMERS LIST 38 31-118-23 41 0001 04040 NATERTC»tl RD DANIEL F KOKESH DAVIEL F KOKESH 4040 HATER10IM RD MAPLE PLAIN 194 55359 38 31-118-23 41 0004 04105 NATERTOHN RD 0 6IGUERE A A GIGUERE JOE A PAM SAI4CHUK 4105 HATERT0I94 RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 31-118-23 41 0011 04115 NATERTOFM RO MICHAEL R A MARY E PLANK MICHAEL R A MARY E PLAMC 4145 NATERTOI94 RO MAPLE PLAIN 194 55359 .1 '»« 1.' ' V'• * J i REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 38 31-118-23 41 0002 04025 HATERTOF94 RD J S A P 0 RICE JEROME STANLEY RICE 4025 HATERT0I94 RO MAPLE PLAIN 494 55359 * i \r \ r:. * . 38 31-118-23 41 0005 04085 NATERTOHN RD C F DALE A 6 L PAULSON CHRISTOPHER F DALE GERI L PAULSON 4085 NATERTOF94 RD MAPLE PLAIN 494 55359 ' . I ■ s' TOTAL BATCH 002 00008 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY 0EPART4«NT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNONLEDGE ANO BELIEF. DAT E Ij. ^5 lii^Y \ ■ $ ry T L . t kr- ■■■ •^ * 9 #1612 1 J i V :• ... i w . ; ‘ * • • • U ;• .* ♦ * } * • i- •'*« ^ • ! * ci'- V ' * *' *> • t • •• V * • fi. fv.’" • • ‘ I" t • • ; I ^ I I • I .»<.• » * ;*‘! * ri '^ * / S.I • . * < • * i \:• f « \\ ’ji • • f* - •• T , • • \«* . ' -s*.» , Jf11> 'A **A,'> * 1:4. • %> ■Hr J.- I I i U 1 A9 -I ! f' .fc * . •- 1 H5HH- W , iJ.©! ^ CHXPPERA 9 C 3 S 3 SECOND : (IW t (H) f i 9 ^ . ADDN ^ ^ 4im / 1 ' / * (1?) l«iHI •■. 14© 01 A 4* MO 04 JiH .15 SI . y (2) 'i») s f ff --*7' . < (3) f. * d r ■ [/ ::-mm D #1 ff' ^ %J fiM U rJ X Office located at: 5249 Mam Street East ' r ' ■JACK VIGOREN ATTORNEY' AT LAW Port Office Box 435 Maple Plain. MN 55359 612/479-2090 Dec December 5, 1990 Jeanne A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Application for Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement No new building sites 4085 Watertown Road Dear Ms. Mabusth: Enclosed herewith please find the following: 1.An application for lot line rearrangement signed by the present owner and myself as applicant; 2.A survey including all owners within 350 feet with a certification by Hennepin County Legal Description dept, and mailing labels for said owners; 3.A survey of the smaller piece showing in red the property deeded in 1976, and showing in yellow the new easement to include existing driveway; 4.Copies of deeds a) from Bloom to Kostka in 1976, b) from Sawchuk (contract vendees of encumbered parcel) to new owners in 1990, including in fee for red parcel and easement for yellow parcel, and c) from Giguere (contract vendors of of encumbered parcel) to new owners in 1990, including in fee for red parcel and easement for yellow parcel. S. A check for $250.00. In 1976 the deed from the Blooms to the Kostkas was given in an attempt to convey the property over which the driveway was situated. Said deed was accepted by the county recorder when is was filed in 1981 even though not approved by the city. When the property was recently surveyed it was discovered that the driveway extended beyond what was deeded in 1976 and covered what is marked in yellow on the attached survey. 1 W -J i. JLi page 2 The purpose of the enclosed application for lot line rearrangement is to approve the deed for the property marked in red and the easement for the property marked in yellow. I would like to have this application heard at the very next available planning commission meeting. Please let me know right away if there is anything further you would like me to provide. Very truly yours, Jack Vigore Avmev ^ncs. cc: Darcy Haislet Nick Koeater, Chicago Title Insurance Company Earl Kostka kflV « Air ••• »k»l ««» «< «i.t ii •* i ..•■ «4 V 1 I) «l CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY CfllCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY' EARL IN KQSTKA_______ V<s>g’*r lt/ai<(^ivu'4^ Uxt .#1612 Gf. »f tke WU O <>'(iv n'74 - IdHu e<^sei^ei>^ RtV'tee' - deurlph'on f pi^e I Ifltnvmtfit > 1:- See attached sheet.for legal description Page 1 of 2 GENERAL NOTES Denotes Iron monument Denotes cross chiseled in concrete Denotes existing spot elevation Denotes proposed spot elevation Denotes surface drainage Dashed contour lines denotes proposed features Solid contour lines denotes existing features Proposed top of foundation etevation Proposed basement floor elevation Proposed garage floor elevation = benchmark ; ALL^METRO LAND SURVEYORS 1 hiraby ctrllfy Ihot this survey, ptan or report tir ‘ ••woe prepored ^ me or undtr my direct supervision and that t om a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the Stole of Minnesoto. SCALE I " w 50‘ *-_/f n } BOOK PAOE I ^441iSRFptmjftto I ► \ \ WSST’^iS^ „ «t«i» jinoemntti <^i&Mj.j:&^^!:.:^.i'.Mit httimk.__S»«?...BVo*,j^..pxJ*^^^ •• - - . I . *' I' *'■ '• • * • ^. i:>i »“r/f d 7^ • i •. I • • Hennepin'l%A »nt>nnepxn- •: • iindSiaU .........-....*-^-# iw^-AW- o/;<M Ar<< iLi/—-'—- ^ .1 'V ■■ ” -' - • • • ...........______ ..........................-N..-........of Couidy of. ul/ ■] M auotfd pari. r S I K.* ¥ U : I Ml I nil— ..............»«.»«»«I »tt»i »««—»»■»«»«»««««-------------------------------------- - ^ • .flennapln......'£......anASicUof.^.. L- . ‘ • • ' • - Y C’ -• I- »«««•«•• i^et •«•*•••••»•«• 4 ap*'^ OJ , partUs of f v.„ j ^\\x^tiit%'rTKa%tUtalip<iriXWi..of lhetlrap«Ti,lnoontid*roil<mof ih«tu.mot..^..~...... 0^ • * T One P^llffr and " ^ ~ . '■:: to. then____In hand paid by ths told parHtt of tho iooond paH, tiu rteelpi wUrtof i$ horoiy.aokn<^U, ., I idged, do hortby Grant, Bargain, QuUoUUm,'and Coiwy utUo th^tald parU^ of iho teA^ par*;ao . ^ Joint Unantt and not at fonanit In common, tfulr atAgnt, tho iurvtvor of oald partUi, andm hdr$ aW (Uilfnt of ih$ iurulwrp Forever, all the traot...^ or parcel... of land lyln^ and helnf[ tn V^^ounty of ______^nnepin._______.....and BtaU of Mlni^la, dirtied at follow$, to-wit: [ Sr£’ n: SoSheaet Smarter of ierdon 31-118.23 vhich lie. Scmth and SoathveeUrlx of thr center- line of the South Vftertovn Road, eo called, apd North of the right of yay^f t*e Electric Short Lin. Conpa^ Book 751 of Deedfl* page ioh, and Eaet of the West 35 i^do of eaid East Half,.9^;i».' diotance of 5 toda to the actual i»w*.iw >/* ., tii^ca continuing Nortbueaterly along aald centerline to a point 5 rode Veet at^ght ad4an^lea from rOa diet nee the Eaet line cf^paid 10-aore tract) thence South parallel to e^ Ea^t Una of IhOfeetJ thenep East’to a point on a line drawn South of thej&lnt of nd parallel to the-‘Eaat line of said 10-acre tracti thence North/^ the .eginning and ^_olnt of beginning, r~. Q^bcoorxUng to the D. S. (hsTerhnei^Survey thereof. :/i 03 ‘ C/1 1 m a*, t • «'•W • •a •• MU ml Slat* Deed tax due hereon $ H« • -a ... .(To »abi anh to »Olh Ibt 0ante, Togelhtr with all tho htrtdUamtnU and appurttnanott thtro- %inlS"^elcf%f[Vnf or Ih'dhywUe dpperialninf to the tdld paritoi of the Hoond pari, their oMfne, the rar- iflVar of told partUe, and the Mri'and aeHfne of the eurvlvor, forever, the $ald partite of iheo^nd pari tafdni itl jo^ni^ienarUe, and not ae tenanie In com men. I *. •. I r»sf • />>y ... In treatlmowf Wticttof. Tht told par#..l«“L bf tho ftrti part ha-??-, turtunio tti .«SH Aondft.. tht day and year flrtt oiot>a toritUn. ' K) » « • * a • • • •« • aa a • a » a • * »A-a • tV . •*. ..c.: \.v : ^ ;,V .« •}! ■i 9 a«*taaaae«a#« »aa*a«e •#•»•«#»••*«•« c *.4 i - • a ••♦♦••eee*a4eoe«a*4«4ae »a earn* a eo » a» •# a « 4 e • e a • a a e e aa « 4 a. a»a«ae«aa*4 •a4*^«e**aaa«> ••# e« a«»»4«aa«a. a*e aaa«e* a#***##* t . • -1 'Ivl ••1 192.67 A .t O lU 3 Ui 4^ Q; ^ Q 'S UXv-H d V* 0j4Sg^ y«X "8-?3. wh(ch'^Ties"*Sou'»h* **rf*^"^ Watertown Road, so calUn o' SHort Une Ra.Iway 9' l»*e r.S^'ort Line Rai'lwly c^*n’ T'^ ‘^e n Brok 751 of Oc«ds^ jna''red ■ of the SE t/4 of sild Sect ion’3?"'' rxcEPr; Banqe ’’?//escrXd°'awo{io"®‘°r*^^ ’/'•> • '0 acres Vhe Southwesterly of the ^center!‘ ns, V*. orth of the right-of-way of th^ ci South Wat* »n deed to said CnnL^V^ ^ Hectrir Short iv of the West 35 md^^f ^51 of (SCS 1/2) of saM L One-Malf (£ ,/y, . a <tistance of f iv^e sS^ horthww^f said ten-acre tract to , nnV„/"r^" P^ca- froK. said fast line at a\^.„? * '*'’' cunnir. paint of beginning; then?e^« ‘-Pnty-fo.. of said ten-acre ^arf .K^ ^ * *aid right . beginning. lienee North twenty-four notes" pyrr,;..;;^ r."* r; .7'«'..— fi.,7, " ""’ ... "’" "”' •» <N,. .. „„ We hereby certify that thu i- representation of a ir ^ ‘-’P 'and aboye"descr.b;r fated this 18 SUNDE LAND S'iRVEYtNG. INC. sr: ^ 1987 . r In Boon ni oMhwOt.Ip^o^ BoHnoy Co. on OMcriOnrt ■ H i Ill’ll llrfltfllihit % E’ To:Mayor Peterson ft Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:January 15, 1991 Subject:#1615 Gary Mroz & Ken Hopkins, 59 Ferndale Green Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance- Section 11.03 3. 4. 1. Definition 65 - Definition of Subdivision. 2. Definition 66 - Subdivision Classification. See Class III Subdivision. This subdivision involves a flexible zoning application. Please note the conditional use permit and variance application that involves the review of a proposed shared private driveway installed over a portion of a designated wetland shall be reviewed as a separate application (Application #1616). Definition 24 - Lot Area Minimum. Proposed Lot 2 shall be served with sewer and water. Although technically the applicant would have the right to seek credit for the wetlands area, the applicant proposes development per rural standards with a dry buildable envelope of 2.34 acres. Lot 1 proposed with on-site septic and well meets the 2 acre dry buildable contiguous standards. Total Area =» 270,045 s.f or 6.2 acres Total Area Wetlands » 48,425 s.f. or 1.11 acres Lot 1 « 2 acres Lot 2 « 3.19 acres (dry acres = 2.34, wet = .85) Definition 26 - Lot, Outlot. A lot which is intended only for public or private roadways, open space or other use, which use must be restricted by the appropriate easement and which use must be approved by the City at the time of final plat approval. The use of the outlot will thereafter be restricted by the appropriate restrictive covenant or open space easement. w I r-fiT 'i. Zoning File #1615 January 15, 1991 Page 2 List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C E-’iibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit L Exhibit M Exhibit N Application Applicants Addendum Property Owners List Plat Map MCWD Report 12/05/90 Department of Army Report 10/24/90 Gaffron Report and Septic Sketch Site Evaluator Septic Map Planning Commission Minutes 11/19/90 Comprehensiv" 'Purvey of Wayzata Country Club Wetlands Map Survey Cook's Report Sketch of Lot I's Building Envelope Review of Application - Please review Exhibit I, the Planning Commission minutes for the review of the sketch plan application for the property. It is the applicants position that the only variances sought with this subdivision would be a variance to encroach the wetlands with the construction of the shared access drive. The applicant has designated an outlet for access use. The 1.01 acre outlet area is excluded from the areas of Lot 1 and 2. Lot Configuration Each lot meets the required 200' lot width to the rear of the front 50' setback line. Lot 2 is to be developed with sewer and water. Lot 8 of the Allo-Rae Terrace plat was already assessed for one sewer and one water unit. Applicant does not seek credit of the wetland area and has proposed development with rural standards. Review Exhibit K. Note the City's wetland maps show the drainageway being included as a portion of the designated wetland. During at least three site inspections of this property, staff has reviewed this portion of the drainage/wetland area and notes the following: Drainage from the wetland is taken via an open ditch to a culvert and underground drain tile that carries drainage from the wetland through the golf course and its network of artificial ponds and drainageways and eventually to Lake Minnetonka. It was known at the time of the many site inspections that there was another underground drainage tile leading northward through Lot 2 then eventually draining to the west through the golf course (Exhibit L). The Code will require that these areas be designated as drainageways at a 15' minimum width. The Orono staff has confirmed that these areas are not part of the designated wetland i. \ r- <■. Zoning Pile #1615 January 15^ 1991 Page 3 but are drainageways. As a result, the areas on either side of these drainageways included in the dry buildable continguous envelope. The pi • ..ary plan must be amended to include a 15' wide drainagewa> c ar the open ditch area of Lot 2. This must also include a 15' drainage easement over the underground tile that extends northward and then eventually west through Lot 2. Lot 1 is to be developed per rural standards. In reviewing the preliminary plat and on-site evaluator's mapping, staff found inaccuracies in the placemnt of these improvements on preliminary plan. Gaffron has resketched the proposed building site and drainfield locations (review Exhibits G and H) and a copy has been sent to applicant's surveyor. Please note the majority of the building site is located within the City of Wayzata. Staff has been advised that the applicant has filed a subdivision application with the City of Wayzata. The applicants preliminary plans will be conceptually reviewed by the Wayzata staff in January. Staff reviewed the zoning and setback information with Wayzata. The zoning is residential and setbacks are 45' front, 50' rear and 20' side. In reviewing the setbacks of the proposed building envelope for Lot 1, there would appear to be no problem (review Exhibit H). Please refer to Exhibit L, the preliminary plan, specifically, the section identified as Property Identification Sketch. Please note the majority of the properties within this subdivision are divided off of a parcel defined as PIN 36-118-23 44 0001. The remaining portion of this property must be shown as a lot and included on the preliminary plan. Existing improvements need not be shown nor will it be necessary to define drainageways through the larger Country Club parcel. This property must be included as we are altering the legal description of the entire property. Drainage/Wetland The Minnehaha Creek Watershed preliminary report (Exhibit E) suggests that drainage flows eastward to Gleason Lake. More recent information shows that drainage flows under US Highway 12 from the south and east and flows into the wetland area. Drainage then flows from the wetlands into the drainage tiles and drainage ditch at the west and north edges of the wetland. It is most important that the drainageways be defined as drainage easements on the plat and appropriate easements be taken over them. The areas of the drainage easements must be excluded from the dry buildable area of Lot 2. Drainage easements will be taken over the wetlands area also. The wetlands and drainageways must be defined in Outlot A. Zoning File #1615 January 15, 1991 Page 4 Sever and Hater Lot 2 shall be served with sewer and water seeking the credit of the assessment already placed against Lot 8 of the Allo-Rae Terrace plat. The City is asked to consider sewer and water service to Lot 1. Once again, applicant proposes no changes from rural development standards. Gaffron has confirmed that the site can be developed at rural standards. Applicants' consultant reports that the City of Wayzata would take no issue with the sewering of Lot 1 if the City of Orono approves. It may be necessary to have a separate Comp Plan amendment if Lot 1 was to be included within a sewer and water district. The City Engineer will be asked to comment on this. It may not be necessary as rural standards are to still be retained. Please note Mr. Cook recommends extension of sewer and water to Lot 1 (Exhibit M). Park Dedication The Park Commission reviewed the subdivision to determine if additional park lands or trails were to be taken from the subject property and decided against the taking of any additional lands. Fees will be requested in lieu of lands for park purposes. The assessor has been asked to determine the fair market value of the undeveloped land to determine the park dedication fee. Applicant will be advised as soon as the City is in receipt of this report. Site Grading Inprovements Special land alterations proposed with development of property shall be reviewed under conditional use permit application. The berm area and fencing along east boundary of Lot 1 shall be covered under Application #1616. Issues for Consideration 1.Members may remember that the original sketch plan showed outlets created along the east border of Lot 2. Outlets were to be legally combined with adjacent residential properties. It is apparent that Lot 2 will need the additional dry buildable. In the applicants addendum (Exhibit B), we are adviser! by the applicants that the Wayzata Country Club will maintain the northern portions of Lot 2 and that they will allow access to the adjacent landowners over this portion of the property. In reviewing Definition 24, Minimum Lot Area, if pedistrian easements are to be granted, these areas must be excluded from the dry buildable area of Lot 2. As a result, access can not be T<‘ ■ Zoning File #1615 January 15, 1991 Page 5 granted via private easements and may only exist on an informal basis. Per the subdivision regulations of the City, the creation of all easements must be approved by the City. Does Planning Commission see any problem with the Country Club maintaining this portion of the property (area to immediate north of wetlands)? 2.What is your recommendation concerning request to extend sewer and water to Lot 1? 3.The City's Code provides few guidelines for the creation and design of new lots. The lots have an approved method of access and meet the required lot width at the setback line. The shape of the parcel to be divided is determined by the existing improvements within the used portions of the golf course. Planning Commission members voiced concern during the sketch plan review that the lots appeared contrived. What is your opinion of the layout of the lots with the amended plan? Options of Action Denial - Please refer to the necessary sections within your Subdivision Code for the necessary findings. Table - Pending receipt of an updated preliminary survey and conceptual direction from Wayzata as to the staff recommendations regarding the subdivision. Preliminary Plan to include the following: Designate 15' wide drainageway easements over drainageways in Lot 2 and exclude areas of drainageways from dry buildable. Include remainder of PIN 36-118-23 44 0001 as a lot. Designate wetlands area within Outlot A and cuvlert area as drainage easements. Locate septic envelope and building envelope on Lot 1 per staff sketch. i i .i. / ^ 0 V I- I CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION mt, PROPERTY LOCATION P^i^nc(<x^f^rncl dL K< ' : yJ \ i -c:::- JL:f T'^- -J •'1 i Site Address b'.--V ■ J ' CT Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) TTTV ru Ul • t ^m‘t ' 'iSXJflV rryt^'^nc nccrrrc > JL« I niic t. u i > *L-L, Please check one - Property a_ abstract or torrens? *.w,-w vvv /-w rn/ M “jrri- TJ Attach legal description to application. f • I uu *:v*f TAO»' r?i.W'lA W UrVVJ. MW'i. I V / •. u<? - APPLICANT +Phone (home) 4-~7 3~—T->~o _____ _____________ Phone (work) ix'l* ^ I .»Address: (^S^S-S ^ il-_ _ _ City: i'L- Zip: Name >’OWMER (if different than applicant)Phone (home)• W,* Name Gr '> >- v h d.0 Phone (work) -- - 'y i- w ^ I « -• Address: bU"^i City:> » , 4-% ”> %Zip: V S' > (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size I. ft ' z Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check)Residential? no. of units Other (specify) "_ _ _ _ Present Zoning District - v PROPOSAL Diyision for Tax Purposes X Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:Existing Units New Units Total Units — Proposed Gross Density: m Units per «--» 1 Acres —' Minimum Lot Size:n Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check)Residential Other (specify) ±L I, hi n o °* l V “V MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE jl^LIMIN^Y AfiPLltATION 1. Completed Application Form 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Sur*/ey. 1. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). ^ 4« As an addendum to this application^ please attach a^ separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature^_ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Payment of fees (parJc fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easementsf Covenants/ etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete, oning Official's Signature__^____________________________ Date______________— EES S)cetch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement $150.00 250.00 Preliminary Review (Class I 6 II Subdivision)250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) 300.00 + 20.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* *he applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, 'lanning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and •irther agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. pplicant's Signature \Date I i JO" <iwner's Signature —= pplicant must have all subiWittals inllo the City offices 25 days before the lannang Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the bird Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled eviev/ meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is nablc! to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an uthorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 6 Zoning ffice of this change prior to the meeting. Date 72 — 2/ - ^0 ti- ' JAN 3 1991 January 2, 1991 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Administrator CITY OF ORONO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Fairway Hills Subdivision Dear Ms. Mabusth: We have a purcnase agreement with the WCC for the property referred to above subject to the City of Orono's approval of this subdivision. Our plans for the proposed subdivision have been provided for your consideration. The plans for subdividing this 6+ acre property into two lots have been drawn based upon comment from the Orono Planning Commission and City staff. Based upon the engineer's report, we respectfully request city water and sewer to Lot 2 and, if possible, to Lot 1. It is our intention that the property adjacent to the course and the homes beginning with John Powers residence be maintained by WCC and to allow these homeowners to access the golf course across our property. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 861-8607. Sincerely, I Kenneth R. Hopkins V\Z3fW- Gary Mroz KRH:GM:pb IT ' r f [*.'. 4. • ■* ■ r’ U5;. . (! ; RUN DATE 12/21/90 DATCH 001 *HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY (M4ERS LIST r* ^ * PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYERName/addr SS SA-118-23 44 0001 00038 ADORE S UT4ASSIGNED NAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB HAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB P 0 BOX 151 HAYZATA 55391 • *. ' Va• i HAYZATA MN 55391 I r-• PRW ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR 38 36-118-23 44 0012 0006^ FERNOALE GREEN HAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB HAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB P 0 BOX 151 HAYZATA MN 55391 ^ » • f PROP ADDR OlflER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR 38 36-118-25 44 0015 00045 FERNDALE GREEN GRETCHEN BUHLER OSER GRETCHEN B OSER 45 FERNDALE GREEN HAYZATA MN 55391 « PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR 99 31-118-22 33 0051 00360 FERNOALE RD N VAN EECKMOUT BLDG CORP VAN EECKHOUT BLDG CORP 1935 H HAYZATA BLVO LONG LAKE 'tl 55356 r » • 1 r f it ‘iH it'iiiiMk , REPORT MO. P145S401 PAGE 1 • ••V ? . . I • i 1. 38 36-118-23 44 0002 00045 FERNOALE GREEN DIG OSER DAVID M OSER 45 FERNDALE GREEN HAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 44 0005 00085 FERNDALE RD N HILFRED D GAGNE « HIFE H D GAGNE 85 NORTH FERfR)ALE HAYZATA m 55391 • 4 • \ r: HAYZATA MN 55391 HAYZATA MN 55391 » / r ' I t 38 36-118-23 44 0013 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGT4ED HAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB HAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB o 0 BOX 151 HAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 44 0014 00055 FERNDALE GREEN HILLIAM A MUELLER HILLIAH A MUELLER 55 FERNOALE GREEN HAYZATA MN 53391 i # -*■« 99 01-117-23 11 0001 00197 HAYZATA BLVO H HAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB HAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB BOX 151 HAYZATA MN 55391 99 31-118-22 33 0048 00344 FERNOALE RD N A D JACQUES t S J JACQUES ALISTAIR D/SUZANT^ J JACQUES 344 FERNDALE RD N HAYZATA MN 55391 .1.; t I T •' 99 31-118-22 33 0052 00350 FERNDALE RD N GEORGE L A MARY LEE G GEORGE L A MARY LEE G 350 FERfTOALE RD N HAYZATA MN 55391 VEIT VEIT TOTAL BATCH 001 00017 • K i . 1 % : ^ ■ : ' , r •* ; • . * J ■ < ^ , i . : i’l ‘- ^Ut V • J Vi Mi. 38 36-118-23 44 0006 • ‘J 38 36-110-23 44 0007 38 36-118-23 44 0008 * * r '. • • . # • PROP ADDR 00075 FERIK)ALE RD N 00070 FERNOALE GREEN 00090 FERNOALE GREEN OHNER NAME TERRY D JOHNSON il.' ■ H STEINKRAUS t B MCMILLAN J R COLEMAN ABN COLEMAN ‘ ^ L.TAXPAYER TERRY D JOHNSON HALTER J STEINKRAUS MD JOHN R COLEMAN * • T • V V NAHE/ADOR 75 FERfOALE RD N U * . • . '•BARBARA MCMILLAN 90 FERNDALE GREEN ■ . -.ir '■ {.HAYZATA HN 55391'.'70 FERNOALE GREEN HAYZATA m 55391 1 ' * • , •* • ' 1 »• H*.;.HAYZATA MN 55391 • • 1 ”h *. 1 ■. . 'I * f 38 36-118-23 44 0009 #« .38 36-118-23 44 OOlu 38 36-118-23 44 0011 ♦ . 1. V• A PROP ADDR 00100 FERNDALE GREEN r ♦ •t 00095 FERNOALE GREEN 00085 FERNOALE GREEN OHNER NAME P G FARNAND A C H FARNANO .CHARLES A HULSE JAR POHERS ‘ V • ■ ' • r »A TAXPAYER PATRICK 6 A CAROLYN FARNANO 'CHARLFS A HULSE JOHN A ROXAFt« POHERS ' ' • •i- •r liAHE/ADDR 100 FERNOALE GREEN <95 FERNOALE GREEN 85 FERNDALE GREEN ■ . •;. f ■ I il •l -I • i *• I .•. r i f / . ^--------.^1 » * ' 1 •c r •» jy % •^CD 0'^ IV32l\32\ji£SilAi-i--. .:. W/ATEf’SHEfL^ . P.O. Box 387, Wayzata. Minnesota 55391 - / d\. ; lUiC'i MMOOfllANAfiBISiJxnesR.Spensley. Pres. •John E Thomas • RK:naro R Muier Robetl 0. Erickson • C. VVbodrow Lov« • CUtkson LindUjy • Thonus Mapte. Jr. If t {‘ if. ■-‘5E T‘.'jf. r “L. V I.-'. / . iAKI MtHMTONRA December 5,1990 DEC 7 IS Mr. Brent Elliott Winfield Homes 12300 Wayzata Blvd. Minnetonka, MN 55343 Re: Construction of a proposed subdivision and access driveway Dear Mr. Elliott: We have received the information you forwarded concerning the two-lot single-family residential subdivision and construction of a driveway extending southwest from Femdale Green in the Cities of Wayzata and Orono. Review of this information indicates that a permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District is required. Enclosed please find a set of the District Rules and permit application form. Concerns for this project are outlined in Rule B - Stormwater Management Plans for Individual Projects and Rule D - Wetland Alteration. The primary concern is the project's effect on the hydrologic capacity of the wetland. This includes the effect on water levels off site during and after construction. In addition, appropriate erosion control methods should be in place to prevent the transport of sediment off site during and after construction, and prompt restoration of disturbed areas be completed with seed and mulch or sod. Drainage from the site appears to ultimately flow east through the City of Wayzata into Gleason Lake. The City of Wayzata has developed a stormwater management plan which includes runoff from this area. The plan sets certain criteria for this subwatershed, therefore this project should be coordinated with both the City of Orono and the City of Wayzata. An understanding should be established for the to overall development of the entire subwatershed. Thank you for forwarding the information. If you have any questions, please contact me at 473- 4224. Sincerely, JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC cc:Board file t-Oity of Orono City of Wayzata Ronald S. Quanbeck, P.B. . I'I 1 ^ I t I M rr - V. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ST PAUL DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1421 MS. POST OFFICE A CUSTOM HOUSE ST. PAUU MINNESOTA 55101 9806 .‘■'v im October 24, 1990 WPITTO AniNTlONOF Construction-Operations Regulatory (90-468N-92)i i’i SUBJECT: Windfield Homes, Access Road Fill, SE 1/4 SE 1/4 Sec. 36, T. 118 N. , R. 23 W., Hennepin County, Minnesota Bert Elliot Uindfield Homes 12300 Uayzata Boulevard Minnetonka, Minnesota 35343 We have reviewed the information provided us about your project. The work Is authorized by a nationwide Department of the Army permit, provided the enclosed conditions and management practices are followed. Your plan Indicates that the 28-foot-wlde wetland crossing would cover only about 175 feet. We have not made a field inspection of the site, although the soil survey and wetland maps suggest that the crossing may be slightly longer, perhaps as much as 250-300 feet. Even this longer crossing would be covered by a nationwide permit at this location, however, because the maximum fill would be about 8,400 square feet. The topography on the site makes it unlikely that the crossing would Involve more wetland. The area identified as horoesites is substantially higher than the wetland. This determination covers only the project referenced above. If the design, location, or purpose of the work changes, you should contact us to make sure the work would not result in a violation of Federal law. In particular, if you plan any additional grading or fill below elevation 964 msl, you should contact our office. Work above this elevation should not require any permit because the wetland should lie below 964 msl, but work below it may infringe on the wetland. The actual wetland line probably lies somewhere between 959 and 964 msl. This verification will remain valid until the nationwide permit is modified, reissued, or revoked. All the nationwide permits are scheduled to be modified, reissued, or revoked before January 13, 1992. It is your responsibility to remain informed about changes to the nationwide permits. We will issue a public n.tice announces the changes when they occur. Furthermore, if you begin or are under contract to begin this project before the date the nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will have 12 months from the date of the modification or revocation to complete the project under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit. 'T*w(«3 I p I f •It It Is your responsibility to insure that the work complies with the terms of this letter and the enclosures. IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS AND APPROVALS BEFORE YOU PROCEED WITH THE PROJECT. If you have any questions, please call Joe Yanta at (612) 220-0362 Enclosures cfiTef, Regulatory Branch Construction-Operations Division Determination: 330.5(a)(26)(1) - Fill in a headwaters wetland. I <i i f::.- r mihhesota Authorltjr for the following activities la given at 35 Code of Federal Regulations (CFH): 530.5(a)(26) Discharges of dredged or fill material Into the waters iTsted in paragraphs (a)(26)(l) and (11) of this section except those which cause the lose or eubstantial adverse modification of 10 acres or more of suoh waters of the United States. Including wetlands. For discharges which cause the loss or substantial, adverse aKidlflcatlon of one to ten acres of such waters#Including wetlands, notification to the district engineer Is required In accordance with Section 330.7 of this section. (Section 404) (1) Mon-tldal rivers, streams, and their lakes an Impoundments. Including adjacent wetlands, that are located above the head waters. (11) Other non-tldal waters of the United States. Including adjacent wetlands, that are not part of a surface tributary system to Interstate waters or navigable waters of the United States (i.e Isolated waters). • f Re/glonal Conditlong [_] Majority of the Project Requires State Permits and/or Approvals • Any person Intending to discharge dredged or fill material Into Minnesota- designated "Protected Waters" shall submit an application to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDHR) before beginning work. Activities are authorised under this nationwide permit after the applicant obtains jilX applicable Minnesota Department of Matural Resources (MDHR) and/or Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) permits and approvals. Work may proceed upon receipt of all applicable MDHR and/or MPCA permits and approvals. Other State and local authorirattons nay be required yijXo gloclijupge of dredged or fill material would cause the loss or substantial adverse modification of: ( ] Lena than one acre of w.-\tcrn of tlie United States [ ] netween 1 and 10 acres of waters of the United St.itcs Kiicl I (Sec revefiie tilde.) Hfglon.tl Conditions (continued) Malorltr of the Project Does Hot Require State Permltn and/or Approval?, This nationwide permit la auhjcct to Regional Condltloua that allow only projccta that would drain, fill, or Inundate an area of LESS TEAK 10,000 SQUARE FEET of waters of the United Statea. The project Involves a discharge of dredged or fill aat-.’^lal Into the following area(s): j ^ trout streaks - the head waters (and adjacent .^elands) and the tributaries (and adjacent'wetlands) of these streaias. C—3 FEDERAL WILD AHD BCEKIC RITERS (ST. CROIX RIVER) - all head waters (Ind adjacent wetlands) of these streams. r—1 LAKES/VETLAHDS larger THAK 10 ACRES - all wetlands adjacent to theae head water lakes and wetlands. These areas arc identified by MDKR on their “Public Vatero/Wetlands Inventory" maps. f—3 STATE PROTECTED WATERS LARGER THAR 10 ACRES - wetlands adjacent to these Isolated waters. These lakes are Identified by KDKR on their "Public Waters/Wetlands Inventory" maps. tVij^ecause Che project does not involve a discharge of dredged or fill ‘Material into any of Che areas listed above, this nationwide permit . authorizes fill in waters of the United States (including wetlands) that causes the loss or substantial adverse modification of less titan one acre of waters of the United States. ^ X D G The (ollMint MAHAOEMEMT PKACrlCBS ehell be precticee oey be .he edveree effect*, .f ch... dle.h.r*.. cn the '“lne« “ dUc/etlonery euthotlt, to r.suUt. Olechet... Of dt.d».d « fin ..t.rl.1 Into w.t.t. of the United St.t.e .hell be .voided ot nin.nu. through tht u«e of othot pttctlcol •Itornotlveo, 2. Discharge. In spawning area, during spawning seasons shall bo avoided. oV= «Xc«v;iTn ‘o:'. tr:i:.r;h:=tii« «rptV..';* p™. :f r. fill is to impound waters). 5. 6. r. 8. Discharge in wetland areas shall be avoided. Heavy equipment working in wetlands shsll be* placed on mats. Discharge into breeding areas for migratory waterfowl shell be avoided. Ml temporary fills shall be removed in their entirety.o:) Hetionvide pet.it. do n« *^j;*'* f p‘“u,gl^"do*Mrluth “i'e°enJ°l!joIy to the propett? or r.y':a:‘*i«:tnt:^:t “:uh Vnt ..i*.tin. o. propo..d fed.r.i project. v. :a?v. Modification. Suspeneion or Revocation of Mationwide Permitat - . ....n.nd or revoke nationwide permits in accordance with the relevant The s«h ”«hVrity include., but i. not limited to. eddin, indivlduel. ■’•tionel. or rnSl'uu^l* :r lunll p«.1»f ::1«0Vin, .. .uthori..ti.n on . ‘“i*; 3™* t. conc.tn. fot the •< “ «*ct.tion.ty euthocity in e.ction 33a5- m ' The following SPECIAL CONDITIONS muat be followed in order for the nationwide perolte to be valid: ‘ 1. That any diecherge of dredged or fill material will not occur in the proximity of a public water supply intake; 2. That any discharge of dredged or fill material will not occur in areas of concentrated ahellfieh production unleia the discharge is directly related to a shellfish harvesting activity authorised by paragraph (a)(4) of this section; ■»’ 3. That the activity will not jeopardize a threatened or endangered epeciea at identified under the Endangered Species Act or destroy or adversely modify the critical habitat of such species. • 4. That the activity shall not significantly disrupt the movement of those species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody (unless the primary purpose of the fill is to impound water); 5. That any discharge of dredged or fill material shall consist of suitable material free from toxic pollu tants in toxic amounts; 6. That any structure or fill authorized shall bo properly maintained. 7. That the activity will not occur in a component of the National Wild and Scenic River System; nor in a river officially designated by Congress as a "study river” for possible Inclusion in the systemt while the river is in an official study status; 8. That the activity shall not cause an unacceptable interference with navigation; 9, That, if the activity may adversely affect historic properties which the National Park Service has Hated on or determined eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, the permittee will notify the District Engineer. If the permittee encounters a historic property that has not been listed or determined eligible for listing on the National Register, but which may be eligible for listing on the National Register, he/she will notify Che District Engineer. 'V 5,. 10. Tha^ the construction or operation of the activity will not impair reserved tribal rights, including, but not limited to, reserved water rights and treaty fishing and hunting rights; 11. That in certain states, an individual state water quality certification muat be obtained or waived; 12. That in certain states, an individual state coastal zone management consistency concurrence must be obtained or waived; 13. That the activity will comply with regional conditions which may have been added by the Division Engineer; 14. That the management practices shall be followed to the maximum extent practicable. (See reverse side.) i .. . .. Jeanne Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator i.n I • From: Date: Subject: Michael P. Saffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator January 14, 1991 #1615 Gary Mroz & Kenneth Hopkins - Subdivision Septic Testing r^■ I have reviewed the soil testing information submitted and would make the following comments: V. 1.Lot 2, Block 1 has not been tested, and is intended to be served by City sewer from Ferndale Green. A stub is available. 2.Lot 1, Block 1 is split between the cities of Orono and Wayzata approximately 50/50. The preliminary plat drawing does not accurately show the tested and available primary and alternate drainfield sites. I have plotted these on Exhibit A, showing the primary and alternate drainfield sites in yellow, and the hilltop building envelope in blue. 3. 'r*: Schirmers reports that the area just to the east and northeast of the tested drainfield sites contains fill material, hence the drainfield sites cannot be expanded to that relatively flat area. The building envelope southwest of the tested sites is on the high point of the property, and may well allow for a gravity flow trench system from a house developed on the top of the hill. This building envelope is roughly 80' by 140' average, bounded by 30* side setbacks on the west and northwest, by the drainfield sites on the east and northeast, and by the steep slope to the southeast. 4.System design was based on a 5 bedroom home, alternate site also can handle a 5 bedroom home. The I- Based on the above information. Lot 1, Block 1 appears to be cjc ,'able of development using septic system and well. While it might be feasible to locate drainfield sites further west on the property, no such sites will be found further east, hence flexibility of house placement on this 2 acre lot is somewhat limited. Isv / \ >\N X S'.y -\ .......•%.\ V r iO—“..-------o?;s" \ N r #y X 'S'~'Sr -V-\p>. / X / / .X 7 7 V V- :e'K ■\A' X.'A ,S'A 4./ y y A V \ \ f / / \ \ A <f> >/ s « «/J /■A s A '^X\s \ X•eVs \ i> t o\\ »^» \ c X < -\oN 'A'<S !>' i V V .*1 \ X \X n- •»X f/^ c \ % \ / / \ xooon .1* » i - \ tt‘-« I®* Eft *44 *60 tS \ \\'^\\i. * *■ \ uj i S fO<0 O) t Of. 0> ^ O' •••••:.'-^1 ' •: y _PJ.Ki.Wo.l\ Phip8fcei,:;-vm \V -V---\ ^ i-in-za-n-oool 31.70 ^ N0*^4 > • \ \ \ \ iMiii y^\ ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 19, 1990 REBERS CONSTRUCTION CONTINUED Kelley said. "We are being asked to review and vote on these applications. If Council agrees with an abbreviated procedure, it would not be necessary for Council to reviev/ each of these cases. Another alteration I would like to see in this process is that comparable area within the building envelope be reduced if alternate back-up aprons are approved within the 50' front street setback area." Mabusth stated that is already being done. Hanson said, "In my opinion, the problem is an inappropriate plan for the considerations." Cohen said, "I agree. However, the house is constructed. Our purpose this evening is to vote on the Variance and I have indicated to Mr. Pflaum that I see no problem with this." It v/as moved by Cohen, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval of the turn-around and driveway configuration for 2008 SugarwoodiJ Drive as proposed, and that screening be provided from the street. Bellows asked if the motion could be amended to include language stating that this in no way sets a precedent and that e.ach property will be looked upon individually. Cohen amended his motio^' -c include Bellow's statements. Johnson, seconded. Mot.," 6, Nays-0. Motion carried. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 3 It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Hanson, to recommend approval of the Comprehensive- Plan Amendment #3 as proposed by Staff. Motion, Ayes-6, Nays-0. Motion carried. #1607 GARY MROZ - 65 FERNDALE GREEN SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Gaffron displayed Mr. Mroz's sketch plan and reviewed his proposal and the related issues (see Michael Gaffron's memo dated November 13, 1990). It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that access for Lot One be achieved via an outlet. Johnson asked whether this property currently exists as two separate parcels, or as one. Gaffron stated that the property currently consists of three separate tax parcels which are all owned by the Golf Course. Johnson said, "I would not be able to support this. I think the proposal is too contrived. There is no road frontage other than Highway 12." Mabusth ntted that it may not be necessary to grant lot - 19 - Iifnm-itrkii fiiIIIiliinitnriiTiii----- ORONC PLANNING COMWISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 19, 1990 ^20NING file #1607-MROZ CONTINOED T-f* art 1Cwidth Variances if an outlet is designated for access. Johnson asked about the ramifications due to the wetland. Gaffron asked flabusth what information she and Engineer were able to gather after a site inspection. the City Mabusth replied, "We were able to determine that the werland is classified as a Type 6 and that it would be best to follov/ the designated wetland area." Gaffron asked the Planning Conunission for their opinion regarding the need to cross the wetland to access the property. Bellows stated that t.his property may be another that is not suitable for subdividing. She too thought the proposal for subdividing to be contrived. Cohen stated that the property has one buildable lot. Hanson concurred. Johnson suggested that it may be time for the Wayzata Country Club to taka a comprehensive review of the property they intend to sell, rather than selling it off in a piece-meal manner. to go. Kelley asked where the secondary septic system is proposed Gaffron stated that a septic tester has been out to the site and that it may be possible to have both primary and alternate on each lot. He added that it may be possible to extend sewer to this property. Hanson said, "It appears that there are many Variance issue that would need to be addressed." Kelley stated that the subdivision proposal should not require any Variances. Gaffron informed the applicants that it will be necessary to receive Variance approval and a Conditional Dse Permit from the City of Orono to cross the wetland. Mr. John Powers, owner of property north of the subject property, stated that he supports Mr. Mroz's plan. Gaffron also stated that the wetland will have to be defined to determine the amount of contiguous, dry buildable. 20 - j i S• i I r iiiii'i iieiiii III ilwlfci ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 19, 1990 ZONING FILE #1607-MROZ CONTINUED Mabusth asked Mr. Elliot if the wetland had been defined by following the designated wetland or by the use of elevations. Mr. Elliot replied, "The elevation extends out onto the fairway of the Golf Course. On the two sides of the wetland, there is an elevation, but no definition on the western or eastern boundary." Mr. Mroz asked the Planning Commission if they would vote negatively if the only Variance issue was crossing the wetland. Kelley replied, "No." t Bellows stated that it would be unlikely that the wetland issue would be the only Variance. Cohen stated that he would look favorably on- the subdivision if the wetland Variance v/as the only issue. APPROVAL OP MINDTES-OCTOBER 15, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING The Planning Commission did not receive a copy of the October 15, 1990 minutes to review. This item was tabled until the January 15, 1991 Planning Commission meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE It was agreed that Maureen Bellows would be the Planning Commission representative ab the December 10, 1990 Council meeting. ADJOURNMENT The November 19, at 9:55 p.m. 1990 Planning Commission meeting adjourned - 21 - , . JCmm m . - I . * *** To;Planning Conunission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Conunission Members City Administrator Bernhardson ^. From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject January 16, 1991 #1616 Gary D. Mroz & Ken Hopkins, 59 Ferndale Green Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 - Conditional Use Permit required for land alterations involving the filling of wetland areas in excess of 100 cubic yards. The conditional use permit will also cover proposed berm being installed within the eastern boundaries of Lot 1 of the proposed Fairway Hills Addition plat. Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 — Variance is required for the filling of a designated wetland. Total Area of Wetland = 48,425 s.f. Pill will affect 16% or 7,900 s.f. of the wetland. 2,100 cubic yards of material will be placed within the wetlands. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G - Application - Mailing Certification - Grading Plan - Applicants' Engineer's Report - Cook's Report - Filter Fabric - Spec Sheet - Hay/Straw Filter Barrier - Spec Sheet Review of Application - Application #1616 has been filed as a separate application, but is an integral part of the comprehensive review of the subdivision application #1615. This phase of the review deals with the access road (Outlot A) that is divided by a designated wetlands. To achieve access to the sites requires filling of a portion of the designated wetland. Lot 8 of the Alio Rae Terrace plat provides access to the public road, Ferndale Green. The property is owned by the Wayzata Country Club. Access cannot be achieved through the western or northern portions of the Country Club property. /i j< Zoning File #1616 January 16, 1991 Page 2 of 3 During the sketch plan review of the subdivision at your November 19, 1990 meeting. Members advised the applicant that if the only variance sought by applicants was the encroachment of the wetland, that they would have no problem in approving the proposed 2-lot plat. As already noted in the review of Application #1615, the current proposal does not require variances to the standards of the RR-IB zoning district. The driveway is designed at a 14' width. The City Engineer has asked that 3' shoulders be installed on each side of the roadway for a 20' total width. Note to compensate for the filling, the drainage easement or conservation and flowage ease ment will be taken over 55,000 s.f. Cook feels the developers have provided adequate area to mitigate the encroachment. In preliminary discussions with Ron Quanbeck, storm water detention will not be required based on the assumed amount of impervious surfacing to be installed as a result of the 2 lot development. Two 18" culverts are proposed to be installed under the driveway to insure surface water flow is not restricted based on 100 year storm data. Applicants' engineer advises that if storm water detention is deemed necessary in the future, that there is adequate area on Lot 1 and Lot 2 for this purpose. It may be necessary to place some kind of restriction on these areas for some future date. We v/ould ask for further comment by the City Engineer. Cook also concurs that there is no need for mitigation excavation at this time. The wetlands is classified as a Type 6 and Type 7, similar to the wetlands observed in the Alan Carlson subdivision off of Watertown Road. At three site inspections, staff was never able to find standing water in any area of the designated wetland. The wetland is not a DNR protected wetlands. The Corp of Engineers has been asked to review the proposal. As already noted in the subdivision application, the Corp will grant a national permit because the fill area shall be limited to 7,900 s.f. The Corp limits national permits to 10,000 s.f. The land alteration application has been filed with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Staff would like to take the opportunity to compliment Mr. Anderson with his preparation of the materials for this review. Glenn Cook has recommended approval subject to the road being expanded to include the 3' shoulders on either side, and also recommends that the fire marshall review the road for access purposes. Staff would ask Mr. Anderson to provide more detail on the berming proposed within Lot 1. Mr. Hopkins has advised that the berm will be minimal in height as the installation of the house will involve the cutting into the bank. Planning Commission members should be aware that the fencing proposed along U.S. Highway 12 will be at a 3*i' height and will meet the standards of the fence code. ; •■•' «•< . t!i Zoning File #1616 January 16, 1991 Page 3 of 3 Options of Action - 1. 2. Table, pending receipt of more detailed information on the terming within Lot 1 and until the Planning Commission has acted on the preliminary subdivision application (#1615); or Approval. Planning Commission members may consider some of the following findings: A. There is no other access to the proposed residential sites. B. The wetlands is classified as a Type 6/7 wetlands and contains no standing water. C. The encroachment is deemed minimal by both the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the Corp of Army Engineers. D. The alteration of the wetlands will not involve the construction of ditching, but flowage will be allowed to fan out over the grass-land area. E. The applicants have provided additional retention area to mitigate the filling of the wetlands. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Construction of road cannot begin until applicants* representatives have provided a national permit from the Corp of Engineers and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. 2. Engineering plans for road to be amended to include 3* shoulders on either sid6=. Fire chief to approve amended road plans. 3. Applicant to maintain erosion control throughout the entire project until ground cover is restored. Approval is based on the amendment of plans by Roger A. Anderson per recommendation of Ci / Engineer, dated January 3, 1991 and entitled "Prelimina.: ,> '~!’^in - Drainage, Driveway and Erosion Control, Fairway Hil . & edition". ^ f / / /.^ ' C: / CITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION J PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address _ _ _ 7T V-l IK v; ) Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)f-TW “iT r“i/!'rfAi/1 ua f ( k’l i^rtuifu L vau SkT'C nr;/ j.nrTj^i.'U v/r#rrrr • i *• M »• i^w»V'—VV'VW Please attach legal description to application if not included 2QO.CO on required survey. ___’’’/ .<uu\ A/“> APPLICANT Name Phone (home) Phone (work) V /j g1 ^ 7ii-' 12/23/: Address /732--5' City J^cY>y4),'T>( Zip OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) Phone - G' 2/^^ 3Gcrt I I Address 7 ^7. ( L(*/t/cx. 0 City Zip Date Property Acquired __ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ __ (month/year) j (do) notj^also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application rv •t V __ $125.00 Residential accessory Use % $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _ _ $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more - - , ». Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule ■ -y ‘ APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 ' $175.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Basement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Appeals ■ ,r • other - see fee schedule h Ilf M II m ^ 'iSiafiinti^i PRESENT DSE OP PROPERTY p ^ . p Present Zoning District p. - f /-^ Present Use of Property //Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail; ii/ I 'M f/J _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1, Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan^ if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 3. 4. 5. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11* X I?" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete Initials of Clerical Staff: Date _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administra r, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )cnowledge. Date /ZApplicant's signature OmnDtS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and ve^ficatiorO of this request. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date /g /f(JOwner's signature Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building t Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. til /• ■ r- CERTIFICATE OP HAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO ) ss. I, Linda Vee, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1616, was mailed to the attached list of property owners^ In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 2nd day of January, 1991. 1^: i I irtuei lUr .■ill H- :uu~.*nt 0:-0:'-03 Section: Slope Protection Subject: Hay/Straw Filter Barrier • y U t. Excavaislhelrencti.2 P*ac« and stake straw baies. </ 1 \AMg« iooM straw detwMn 4. Bdckfitl arxl compact the excavated soH. Source: Adapted from installation ot Straw ^ FaDnc Fler Samers fdr Sediment Control. Sherwood and Wyant Illustration: Hay/Stra-^ Filter Barrier Staking Each bale must be securely anchored by at least two stakes driven through the bale. The first stake in each bale must be driven toward the previously laid bale to force the bales together. Date 4/89 Page 2 of 3 C5 “ ■■ ( r I f / • I y.t': ny Trench Dale 4/89 Document 02-03-04 Section: Slope Protection Subject: Silt Fence Filler Barrier ■’I tv 5) A trench must be excavated approximately 6 inches wide and 6 inches deep along the line of posts and upslope from the barrier. The trench must be backfilled and the soil compacted over the filter fabric. The following illustration shows the construction of a silt fence filter barrier. 1 Set pests ana excavate a 6- oy 6-m trenen ucsioee from and aiong me «ne oi pesfs. 2 Staple Wire fencing to me posts. 3. Attach the filter tabnc to me wire fence and extend rt rto tr.e 5 ’ench. 4. Sacktill and comcact the excavated soil. Filter faonc Source: MnCOT Illustration: Silt Fence Barrier Page 2 Of 4 1 4 • ihJiiL^nWhiiii^tfe ....fill 11 .i if- i. January 3, 1991 Fairway Hills Add. Page 3 of 3 3. Surface Drainage Surface water flow through the site appeairs to be intennittent. There is no clear estedslished drainageway through part of the wetleu:^. can the high water information provided by the MNDOT TH 12 plans, we have cxarputed expected flows frcan a 100 year storm to be 19 cfs, and have provided two 18" culverts under the driveway to accomnodate this water. We suggest that these culverts be placed at a relatively flat grade and at an elevaticnn which will pass the 100 year storm without an increase ’’n hi^ water elevation. We also suggest that, to maintain the character of the wetland, no specific channel be cxanstructed connecting the existing culverts. Seme annual maintenance of this cnilvert may be required. 4. Stormwater Detention The regulations of the watershed require on-site stormwater detention sdiere runoff flows are a’tered. Constructicn of two houses and the driveway wcjuld cover alxut .55 acre with in^jervious surfacing or 9% of the site. In our preliminary cxxtversaticxis with Mr. Ron Quanbeck from the waterslied, he indicated on-site detent icon may not be rec^uired for this development. If it is determined that stormwater detention is necessary, the areas southeast of the driveway in Lot 1 and north of the house in lot 2 would be adequate for this purpose. Summary This information is provided to assist the City in their review of the projeert. CXir primary focxis was for the drainage/wetland considerations, but we have also included a preliminary design for driveway and utility construction. In our opinion, the improvements shown will meet the requirements of the City and Watershed regarding site drainage and wetland emcroachment. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter. Sinoeraly, .:. V . A. Andersen, P.E. Attaednnents ••• ♦»*. i. . • ■■•mi- . Si, oc: Ran Hopkins Gary Mroz .Lot Surveys _ _ _ _ ■ . ' <■ » - : , .. . . i • . • _. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... ... ... . ‘ . . . . . .- ^ *• •- ' . J 1 ^ _ .... . ............ e- .*»•#, •.*•= r ^ .* ..rMMMKskAuttih.., s2- V ;>■ • . ■ sC.'i !■; Janviary 3, 1991 Fairway Hills Add. Page 2 of 3 Soils on the site are predcxninantly Heyder and Burnsville sandy loairs per the Soil Conservation Service maps. The low areas are shown as peat/ntuck. Proposed Plat- Driveway and Development The preliminary plat shows two buildable lots of 3.2 and 2.0 acres, and an 1.0 acre outlet for driveway and utility access. E^reparing the lots as buildable sites will require the construction of an 800 foot driveway, part of which will be across the existing wetland. The plans show a 14' wide bitiiminous driveway with 3:1 side slopes and a maximum grade of 7%. Preliminary alignment is indicated on the plans, with final location and grade to be determined in the field to allow saving of trees, balance of earthwork, and minor adjustments in drainage. Driveway grade and location is also restricted by the need for culverts to maintain drainage, and the elevation of the sanitary scH^r. Depending on house design, some site grading may be required at the building locations. Sewer and water will be extended from the existing city mains for the nearest house. The remaining house is proposed to have a private well and drainfield, althou^ it may be desirable to also provide sewer and water to this house. Drainage and Watershed Considerations 1. Wetland filling The driveway fill would cover about 7900 SF of the existing wetland. The maxiiman hei^t of fill would be about 6 feet, and it would require 2100 cubic yards of material within the wetland limits to construct the roadway. In addition, it will be necessary to remove some of the peat under the proposed driveway to obtain a sound roadbed. There is a total area of 48,425 SF of wetland on the site. The pre^gsed fill would affect approximately 16% of this area. The area north of the existing wetland is at or near the elevation of the wetland. As a part of the plat, the owner proposes to place this area of about 55,000 SF into a permanent easement for dtainage purroses, which will preserve its ability to filter and retain nsioff. 2. Erosion Control The plans show erosion control itois to be utilized during construction, inclixling silt fetice, ditch bale cdiecks, and turf establishtxait. These will be installed and maintained per the Watershed guidelines. Typical details for silt fence and ditch bale checks are attached. D % • • i.' • •• . 1 V-- ^ ^ —« • - fO!Roger A. Anderson & Associates, /nc|jy{ Civil Engineering Consultants Suite 107, 7415 Wayzata Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55426 (612) 546-7035 cnYcf(XGr<o jlTTjI 4 1991 City of Orono Planning Dept. Box 66 Crystal Bay, tf) 55323 January 3, 1991 TT A. W JL '/I M or Attn: Jeanne Mabusth Re: Preliminary Plat Fairway Hills Add. OronoA^ayzata, MN Comm. No. 9057 Gentle This letter report is to provide information regarding the preliminary plat of Fairway Hills Addition. Site Conditions The site is an irregularly shaped parcel of 6.2 acres located in the northwest quadrant of Ferndale Poad and TH 12. The majority of the site is in the City of Orono and the remainder (about 5%) is in the City of Wayzata. The westerly boundary is adjacent to the Wayzata Country Club. Access to the site is from an existing curb and gutter cul-de-sac street, Ferndale Green. City sewer and water are available. A site plcui of the site is attached to this letter for your reference. Drainage, Ttopograriiy, and Wetlands Abo*it 1.1 acres of the site is a City designated wetland. The wetland was visually classified by the City as a combination Type 6 ( shrubs, brush, intermittent surface water) aixi Type 7 (brush and trees). There is a hi^ knob on the south side of the property idiich rises 40' above the wetland. Site drainage is generally from southeast to northwest. Grades across the wetland area are flat. There is a 51" ^>an arch pipe under TH 12 just west of Ferndale i4iich drains across an adjacent property and into the site. An 18" C>P culvert channels the runoff westerly under two golf course fairways. Oltiinate dis^xsal of this water is south to Lake Minnetonka via ar< open ditch. No erosion or flooding problems were observed at the time of the survey. Drainage jurisdiction lies with the Minnetonka Creek Watershed District, the City of Orono, and the City of Wayzata. m* • ». r • t.a:* ^ V Land Davatopnient * Municipal • Highways * Railroads . - i To: ;v fi-V Mayor Peterson & Crono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Eernhardson From Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:January 16, 1991 Subject:#1570 Chuck Downey, 2665 Casco Point Road - Conditional Use Permit - Continuation of Public Hearing List of Bschibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Planning Commission Minutes 8/20/90 Applicant's Revised Sketch Retaining Wall Section Cook Report ' ..1 Review of Current Application - At your April 20th meeting, the Planning Commission tabled the conditional use portion of the application providing applicant time to work with the City staff in order to reduce magnitude of retaining wall construction and to specifically address the areas of concern. Those areas were defined as eroding bank adjacent to boathouse and erosion near stone walk adjacent to southern lot line. Staff met with applicant and applicant's consultant in late sximmer. The revised plan proposes retaining walls lim’^ed to two sections with one running approximately a total of 58* parallel to the lake a id continuing eastward along the access stairs. The second sec. on will be placed along the south lot line at approximately a 3 to 3 1/2' I Igh height for 25 +'. Please review Exhibit B. Per Planning Commission's original directive, the applicant seeks approval for replacement of access stairs within 0-75' setback area at a 3' width. Staff has been advised they will be grade level cement pads supported and surrounded by timbers . The applicant proposes the same design for the retaining wall construction and has once again submitted the same cross section. The walls adjacent to the boat house will be at approximately a 4 to 4 1/2' height. In regard to the upper wall. Cook cautions that the wall may channelize the water and erosion problems may result. Applicant should be placed on notice that he would be expected to maintain the repair of this retaining wall in order to insure against any negative impr^t on the lake. In Cook's report he asks that a typical section of the wall should be strengthened by including a lower row of deadmen offset from the top row at 8' on center. Applicant is required to provide erosion control fence between the work areas on the lake. Erosion control must be installed prior to any land alteration. L •S?’ Zoning File #1570 January 16, 1991 Page 2 In approving the retaining wall installation and steps as shown in applicant's diagram (review Exhibit B), the following adjustments must be made to original hardcover facts approved in Application #1493: 0-75* setback area = 4,500 s»f» % Original hardcover = 718.7 s.f. or 15.97% Approved with #1493 = 682.4 s.f. or 15.16% (removal of 105.3 s.f. and 69 s.f. new hardcover) * Adjusted hardcover per current proposal = 652.9 s.f. or 14.5%a I, * Original steps = 142.5 s.f. Proposed steps = 153 s.f For an increase in hardcover of 10.5 s.f. F» Retaining walls ■= 29 s.f. additional hardcover Applicant proposes removal of 105.3 s.f. of existing hardcover Total reduction of 65.8 s.f. of hardcover i-75-250* setback area - 8,325 s.f. Original hardcover » 4,990.1 s.f. or 59.94% Approved hardcover with Applicant #1493 = 3979.3 s.f. or 47.7% Proposed hardcover with installation of new stairs and retaining walls * 3,968.8 s.f. or 47.6%* * Reduction of 20.5 s.f. for reduced stairs at width of 3' Addition of 10 s.f. ^or retaining wall Total reduction of ij,5 s.f. of hardcover Options of Action Denial - Please refer to the necessary sections within the conditional use permit section of your Code for necessary findings. Approval - Members may consider the following findings for approval: Application proposes an overall reduction in hardcover within designated setback areas. 2, Proposed land alterations and installation of retaining walls will stabilize the banks and prevent further erosion. 3. The stability of an existing boat house will be secured and erosion of lake‘*ide banks protected. <'■ .V t ■ Zoning File #1570 January 16, 1991 Page 3 Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant is placed on notice that the upper wall section may channelize water and create further erosion problems. Applicant is responsible for the repair of these areas in order to minimize erosion and protect quality of run-off into lake. 2. Typical section of wall shall be strengthened by including a lower row of deadmen offset from the top row at 8' on center. :^:'v :-:4‘ r.. . :.' r-Mm ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 20, 1990 ZONING FILE #1573-KELLY/MASSEY CONTINUED seconded. Mabusth advised Ms. Kelly that this subdivision would be subject to the new park dedication fees. Motion, Ayes-5, Nays-0. Motion carried. #1571 JOANN GRIMES/JAMES HOFFMAN 4720 NORTH ARM DRIVE WEST VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS PUBLIC HEARING 7:35 P.M. TO 7:37 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Ms. Grimes was present. Gaffron stated that the vacation of drainage and utility easements is necessary due to the recently approved lot line rearrangement. Hanson asked, '=Is the City still unaware of any e.xisting utilities within the existing easement?" Gaffron replied, "That is correct It was moved by Hanson, seconded by Moos, to recommend approval of application #1571, vacation of drainage and utility easements at 4720/4730 North Arm Drive West. Motion, Ayes-5, Nays-0. Motion carried. *70 4JS9TcHUCK DOWNEY 2665 CASCO POINT ROAD VARIANCES REFERRAL FROM COUNCIL AND #1570 CHUCK DOWNEY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 7:38 P.M. TO 7:57 P.M. Mr. Downey was present. Mabusth provided a review of this application, and the .ction previously taken by the Planning Commission and Council (see Jeanne Mabusth*s memo dated August 15, 1990). She said, "The applicant is asking for your special consideration to allow him to have 48% hardcover, rather than 45% as previously approved." She asked Mr. Downey to provide staff with a sketch showing the area of hardcover that he intends to remove. Bellows noted that the after-the-fact deck must also be addressed. Mabusth said, "Staff was asked to determine where the average lakeshore setback line. We have no record of a building permit for the deck in 1982. Mr. Downey assumed that his - 3 - 4 1 1- It- I’l i ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 20, 1990 •rnNTNr FILE il493/#1570-DOWNEY CONTINUED cSctof had included the deck in the perit.it ior the garage Wh^c^wis constructed at the same tin,e The decK rs rn £act rn front of the average lakeshore setback line. Bellows added, -Portions of the principal structure are located in front of the average lakeshore setback line. Mr. Downey stated that he has letters from the neighbors on both sides of his property indicating that they have objections. Hanson said, "It appears to me that the deck does not obscure the neighbors' views. The standard issues that je address when looking at the average lakeshore setback, in this case are almost irrelevant." Bellows concurred with Hanson but stated that there are many other aspects of this property that must also be asked Mabusth to proceed with the review of application U5/0. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mabusth reviewed the history of this 1-he cause of Mr. Downey's drainage problems (see Jeanne Mabusth s memo dlted August 15, 1990). She said, "I have no indicarion or what resulted from the litigation that occurred. The City Engineer and I looked at the property and did not see signs of severe erosion, which one would expect cue to the steep slopes. Mabusth displayed the sketch showing the three-tier plan Mr. Mr. Downey said, "My landscape architect has indicated to me that 40 yards of fill will be needed." Johnson asked Mabusth to show where the cuts are to be made. Mabusth indicated where cuts will be made and are already severe, exposed cuts behind the boat house that will require a retaining wall." :::s-v,.“ rt s\iTV&Y 0 you can se© that is not occurring. - 4 - . I tabtttaxAt/'aaMii ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 20, 1990 ZONING FILE #1473/|1570-DC^raEY CONTINUED for runoff to go other than Mr. Downey's property Mabusth replied, "V7ater has always drained down to Mr. Downey's property." Mr. Downey disagreed. He said, "The neighbor brought in a tremendous amount of fill. There was drainage onco my property, but it was not as severe as it is now since the retaining walls were removed. I knov/ Maureen was out to look at the property. Does the Planning Commission believe there is drainage coming from the neighbor's property?" Rowlette replied, "There is no doubt about it. You can see evidence of where the water is draining and there are exposed tree roots." The other Planning Commissi:5n members concurred. Bellows said, "I am concerned about Mr. Downey's proposal to j^QSolve the problem. I do not see chat v/hat is proposed well fix the area that has had the moft severe erosion. The area by the stone path, as you are approaching the deck, is very unstable. I agree that something needs to be done, but this plan will not accomplish v;hat you are trying to achieve." Bellows referred to thv. letter from the City Engineer. She said, "It is Glenn Cook's opinion that the retaining wall planned is in excess of what is necessary for bank stabilication. He is calling for a retaining wall along the east side of the boat house. However, he is not in favor of the other v/alls as shown." Mr. Downey replied, "I in trying to save as much money as possible and am, therefore, receptive to the City Engineer's comments. I would be happy to cut back the size of the v/all. My biggest concern is the boat house. I’m afraid that erosion will move the boat house out of its present locatron." Dcll'^ws asked Mr. Downey how the boat house is currently being used. ^ -M. Mr. Downey replied, "It is being used as a reci’tctional area for my children and for a place to store v/ater skis, etc." Hanson said, "I am in agreem<*;,c that some form of retailing walls are necessary to deal with erosion, particularly at the east wall of the boat house I concur with Maureen that the area near the deck needs attercion. However, I also agree with the cemiuents from the City Engineer. I would suggest that Mr. Downey get another assessment for resolving the problem from another source. We could table this application for another month." - 5 - ^ • • Si- V -i ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 20, 1990 ZONING FILE #1473/#1570-DOIWEY CONTINUED Mr. Downey said, "I was hoping to have been able to start the house remodeling bv now. I would li^e to solve the drainage problem, but that could wait until spring. Council asked to see the conditional use permit before they would approve the front entry proposal." Rowlette asked whether the applications could be separated Mabusth suggested that the Planning Commission make a strong recommendation to Council that they act separately on the variance phase of the application. She said, "The Planning Commission could provide the reasons for delayxng a recommendation on the conditional use permit. There is really no connection between the two applications. I v;ould suggest to Mr_ Downey that he have his landscape architect meet with City stP.cf to receive some direction- Perhaps the Planning Commissior can also provide some direction as to what they would like to see." There were no comments from the public pertaining to this application and the Public Hearing was continued. It was moved by Hanson, seconded by Bellows, to recommend approval of the applicant's proposal for 48% hardcover. Hanson stated that 48% is reasonable based on the fact that the landscaping was not included in the 1982 surve' by Mr. Do\;ney' s contractors. Motion, Ayes~5, Nays-0. Motion r-arried. It was moved by Hanson, seconded by Moos, to recommend approval of the after-the-fact average lakeshore setback variance for a second story deck, conditioned on the applicant paying a double fee for the permit. Hanson based his recommendation on the fact that the second story deck does not interfere with the sight-line views of the lake for the properties on either side. Johnson believed that in light of the time that has elapsed it is appropriate to waive the double fee. Rov/lette concurred. Motion, Ayes“3, Rowlette, Johnson, Nay. Motion carried. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Hanson, to table application #1570, to allow time for Mr. Downey to work with City staff and his contractor to design a minimal retaining wall system that will address the primary areas of concern. areas include the boat house, and the stone walk near the deck. ?ellow8 noted that Mr. Downey will require approval to have the laK*^shore stairs repaired and that should be included in his application. J<^h:iSon stated that he could not see how the three- tier plan would work and suggested that Mr. Downey may wish to re evaluate that aspect of the plan as well. Motion, Ayes-5, Nays-O. Motion carried. - 6 - MU -A: ^ ' • X' Z • • • urtdi ?ETf^I ,*JIfv/<t, SgrTY ^ U/rti. <- Ootc^veY ?Ofi. -2665 C acco l^rtY CAfTrt ^ Ma/. M A>f. n ^O.cL IV«\M A ncvcfd g'-O'* OC- i'>:6 SoaUi? X**>a\jCi* ^ I V'P. Cqoss -Sectjonj dn ^ <j) ^ ^ ^ rr-tJ) * S+tpS< f-a" ■ ' ” ^ ' W. u, II ►''- r ■ p p- U Bones troo Rosene Anderlik & Associates ORO G Bo^KTOa PE fkxxn W PE JOi^pn C PE VUfWi l Sorv^wi PE Picr^jfO E ”urnef PE GJcrn P Ccc«- PE Thomas £ ^^oy«. PE C^ofrr G Sch'jn<ht PE S*^ijn M £rf^*n, C PA K«h A Gonson P£ p'Cr'arj w Pcsrr PE Dcx'aid C Our;a'r!. *»£ Jerry A Soudxxi P£ Mart A Hjnson PE T«3 K Ee<d PE M<r^ T Rautfr^n P Pcoen R PV*?r^ Engineers & Architects DavxJ O LJSitcu. PE Thomas W Pwerson MKhae* C L>-nch. PE James R Maiand. PE icennetn P Arysenor^ PE Ma^k R ®Di^ **£ PcceR C Pusse« * i A Thomas £ ^ngul P£ MowaRJ A SarAyd PE Ca'^et j Eagerron PE Mar^ A Sra PE *^h.-^0 J Casvs«« PE vraei Maruva. PE Mam O PE Thomas R Anderson. A i A Gary F R>sandcf. PE MJes 3 -Jensen P£ L Ph#c Grave» w. PE C P’ jm a'T. A IA ^gres V Rjrvj A • C p jerry 0 Arrtzsch PE Cecao Omer PE flboert P C.PO*o^ PE Ga% •C' P£ O'-aros A E/oAson l£0 M Paw^enky Martan M Otson January 9, 1991 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: File No. 139-1570 Chuck Downe> jam 1 1 Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the Chuck Downey application for insiallation ot retaining walls. The plan provides for approximately 75 feet of retaining wall on the property. Approximately 65 feet of the wall will be located in the 0-75’ setback area. The section of wall (25’±) ne.xt to the boathouse is necessary to prevent failure of the bank and protect the boathouse. Tlte remaining sections are to reduce mainteiiance problems in the yard. The typical section for the wall should be strengthened by including a lower row of dcadmen as shown^ offset from the top row at 8 ’ on center. The property owner should be required to provide erosion control tence between the work areas and the lake. The upper wall could channelize the water and erosion problems would result. The owners will be required to repair these areas and continue to protect the lake as necessary after the work is completed. Please contact this office if you have any questions, Yours verv trulyjr BONESl'ROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRCrli Enel. 139.cor 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 Ifs ; Mayor Peterson & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Prom Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date January 17, 1991 Subject:#1600 Super Valu Store, 3333 Shoreline Drive - Variances/Commercial Site Plan - Continuation of Public Hearing Additional Exhibits Exhibit Q Exhibit R Exhibit S Exhibit T Exhibit U Exhibit V Exhibit W Exhibit X Exhibit Y Exhibit Z Exhibit AA Planning Commission Minutes 11/19/90 Planning Commission Action Notice 11/27/90 Fuller Letter Regarding Partial Vacation of Kelly Avenue 1/4/91 MCWD Report 12/21/90 Cook Report 1/11/91 Applicant's Engineer's Report 12/28/90 Plan of Retention Pond Erosion Control Methods Catch Basin Detail Applicant's Position Packet - Enlarged south/west elevations Issues to Be Resolved by City - Partial vacation of Kelly Avenue - refer to Exhibit S. As Mr. Fuller's letter advises, he has discussed the proposed partial vacation of Kelly Avenue with the adjacent landowner to the west. Mr. Keavney has voiced concern with the vacation of Kelly Avenue at the northern end because of his needs to provide vehicular access to the southern portion of his property. Staff's inspection of the existing roadway found the topography restrictive and questioned the installation of a cul-de-sac adjacent to property boundaries. The appropriate place for a cul-de-sac may be further south and may not just involve the Super Valu and Keavney properties. A cul-de-sac at the north end of Kelly was never proposed because of the existing commercial uses and vehicular accesses to sites. Members may wish to review Exhibit L of the previous November packet. The planner suggested a realignment of and the creation of a new road with the Navarre redevelopment plans. Access to the southern portions of the Keavney property were to be achieved via a new east/west road to connect with Shoreline Drive further west. 1 Ili ailitfigri fi iisb A.iii MkA'-j-m ti-B cMtAn M ■r- Zoning File #1600 January 17, 1991 Page 2 Please review Exhibit U. The City Engineer recommends moving existing access on County Road 15 to a Kelly Avenue access and moving the current access at County Road 19 to the sourthern property line. Applicant may be able to gain additional parking stalls with the realignment of accesses. Topography at the south lot line may restrict moving access to southern ]ot line. This is an issue that would be best resolved by City Engineer and staff working with applicant. Drainage The City Engineer's report reflects the opinion of the City staff. The storm sewer problems of Kelly Avenue cannot be solved by this property owner only. Storm sewer problems may best be addressed with a comprehensive study at the time of redevelopment proposals for Navarre. There is no doubt that this property is a major contributor to the surface run-off but at the same time this property will also be assessed for this project based on the amounts of surface run-off that originates from this site and enter the watershed. Cook confirms that the retention pond will treat all run-off that results from the proposed addition. The City Engineer was asked if making the pond deeper would allow for greater retention. In this case Cook responded that by deepening the pond you would encourage standing water and in cases of storms, this standing water would already occupy the lower retention area providing no additional retention capabilities on site. Ron Quanbeck of the MCWD has confirmed that run-off from the addition will be handled by the proposed retention pond. There is no structural damage with the seasonal flooding that takes place within the spring and fall of the year. The storm sewer issue is one matter that will be addressed in either a redevelopment project for this area or by an independent storm sewer project. Issues to be Resolved by Applicant Per directives of the Planning Commission, please review Exhibit C, the applicant has prepared position papers responding to concerns of the Commission covering excessive side street setback variance sought at west property line, impact of the retaining wall along west property line, elevations of structure, relocation of internal improvements, relocation of receiving dock and compactor. The applicant has submitted cement elevations of the addition as it relates to the existing structure. Review Exhibit AA), the retaining wall is shown at a maximum height of 17' from final grade. Staff does not understand the import of the relocating of the ramp at the receiving dock. Applicant should be asked to respond. Applicant's contention is that the wall will not only provide a visual buffer to the residence to the immediate southwest but also a noise barrier. jiliui mm I: • r- Zoning File #1600 January 17, 1991 Page 3 The majority of the Planning Commission members in attendance had little problem with the 26 parking stall variance soug ’^t by applicant. The realignment of accesses may provide additional area for additional parking stalls. Staff will not attempt to repeat the findings and/or hardships noted by the applicant in Super Valu's position packet. Staff would only add the most obvious hardship to the land is the location of the 30' wide utility easement that completely divides the property in half forcing applicant to either expand east or west. The topography to the east prohibits reasonable or feasible expansion in light of the impact upon adjacent property and improvements on those properties. A receiving dock may have been able to be installed to the northeast side of this structure but the utility easement prevented such expansion. In 1976 at the time of the development of the property, the City approved a 15' setback (required = 100' from a residential lot line, approved = 85'). The applicant's addendum information advises that the major portion of the addition is located 40' from the side lot line as only the receiving dock and retaining wall structure is located 10' from the side lot line. Staff would contend this structure still has the same visual impact. Options of Action Denial - If denied, please site the necessary findings from the variance sections of the Zoning Code and provide applicant with direction as far as what would be a reasonable setback for a new addition to the structure. Approval - Planning Commission members may site the hardships noted by applicant and staff above. Approval would involve the granting of a side street setback variance of 90* or 90% and parking stall variance of 26 stalls (existing = 114, proposed «* 108, required = 134). Approval may be suject to one or more of the following conditions; 1. Applicant to work with City Engineer to determine feasibility of relocating accesses to site. 2. Applicant shall provide additional natural plantings along southern boundary for plantings lost with installation of retention pond. 3. Landscaping, parking, drainage and grading plans approved per drawing of Planmark. a. Parking at 108 stalls. b. Landscaping as shown along south and west lot lines “ planting schedule to be submitted prior to Council approval. 4. Payment of additional sewer/water units to be determined at time of building permit review. t'T*: i kr t?- ► - , ► ORONO planning COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 19, 1990 ZONING FILE ♦1591-FISHER COOTINUED oertaining The^e were no commentis rrom r.ne - appui«ion and the Poblit Hearinc was closed. *• ^this Xt was -ved^by aoh„son,^_se=o„ded^^^^^^^^^ approval ®n*°''to“sta‘'' -eco'nraTendations and based on Che need f‘r'Sih "ra’lfn-, to drainage conditions. Motion, Ayes-6, Nays-0. Motion carried. *1600 RICK'S SOPER VALO - 3333 SHORELINE DRIVE VARIANCE/COMMERCIAL site P„LIC hear«c;-7 p.m.^to J: i^nd^^^; =L°r^P^U^r.“^^^pr:;era:^v/7o\"V^^^^^^ ^e^e present. The Affidavit of publication and Certificate- of Mailing were duly noted. Mabusth reviewed the P^rinent Bloomquist's applxcation^ -nrner o^ '"he building to within 10' of extend from the a JeceiOing dock that is the west lot line. This^ connected to a 45 foot addition, proposed how manv parking spaces had been ^l^ed a^/^re^uit ^o^^^rading County Road 13. ^ '• T b0^ X6V6 th0r0 w©r*0 appro!5mate^lyT«=erprro?’to the County Road IS proiect." W- T lost. Mr. Fuller stated that approximately 15 to 4O spac-s „abusth aeV'l eLnl ^^Lus?h• s""mLo''°a^teaand previous applicauions vse- November 16, 1990). Chairman Kelley asked if any of the property owners living close to Super Valu were present this evening. There were none present may be*'V«e"atel“from®SrVe«i" building. Mr. Fuller stated "delivery the east system for the store. He ^g^d. Because of the ^iternfl L^%uf o/'S^/sto-, ^lome of the deliveries would be made on the west side." - 2 - ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEI^BER 19. 1990 zoM ^ Aicnn urrv'<i SUPER VALD CONTINUED K°UeJ asKed what times of the day deliveries would be likely to occur. V- 1 i ori "All delivery traffic should be in Mr. Bloomquxst iveries -o the west side of the and out by 11:00 a.m ^'y 10:00 a.m. The first building «vill prooab y -^*7.30 or 8:00 a.m. The west side delive- -.s would V f^^^^ products, of the ouilding will receive f , „oek. There is a fei?re“r<iocK'a-lreadron^har sile of the huildin,." . j Itrnu,p niroDOSsl is to birin^ thst dock So Trope«y Un4 aorthe residehtial area." Mr. Fuller said. " ..^e request °'it"'rs interference with customer' parking." aareed that cusromer parking might make it Chairman Kelley ^^re^a trucks to leave the premises, difficult for the semi-trailer zrucKs Mahusth hext addressed the ex^cinpjnd^ proposed^ for the Pt°perty (see cannot confirm that the 1990). Mabusth said, 3, ® 7Ti^ .na'-ess the dcainage from the K°d?ufh he^rus^-Lilf h^ ^ndLfKd'thrt'fiUn, of the permit application has not yet been completed." Cohen recollected significant concern expressed Avenue residents. in the past there about drainage from has been the Kelly Mabusth confirmed Cohen's statement. 4-K^r-o W0^0 no K^llyCohen stated that he was surprised .hat ...e.. we- Avenue residents present this evening. f^busth noted that the only '"o from a resident ' nsion. She added, "That property norim1;i^cVed''hrth“^d\"aA,age from this property. in th\*''.Tent “^fe Ity^'^iglneer'littrrintr St°"the ”pro^osed retentio.j pond will not work. 1 i aA ’’Staff is recommending that no action be taken on this matter until such issues are resolved. - 3 - . . M -a . ORONO planning commission meeting NOVEMBER 19, 1990 G FILE #1600-RICK'S SUPER VALU CONTINUED Chairman Kelley asked the Planning Commission to comment on "he parking stall variance proposed. Cohen stated that it is difficult to consider an intensification of the building in conjunction with a decrease in parking stalls. Hanson stated that he had the same concern, but questioned whether the applicant has done an occupancy survey. Bellows said, "Parking formulas are just that. I cannot say that I have ever driven by Rick's Super Valu and seen the parking lot full. I am not certain that decreasing the parking stalls is a real issue." Chairman Kelley asked .Mr. Bloomquist whether his lot is used for parking by bus riders. Mr. Bloomquist replied, "I know of two people that use the parking lot for that purpose. If it begins to pose a proolem, I may have to ask them to use the public parking across the street. Up until now, there have been no problems." Johnson stated that he concurred with Bellows. Cohen stated that he was not aware that tne par.king lot rarely filled and that he too agreed with Bellows that parking should not be an issue. Chairman Kelley stated that drainage is the next issue to address. Mr. Bruce Kelley said, "We are proposing a retention pond by constructing a dike, retaining the existing vegetation, and preserving the vegetation between the bituminous and *ot We are also proposing to replace vegetation in kind to screen the pond. There will be approximately 8,000 cubic feet of additional storm water storage in t.he pond. The increased drainage resulting from the addition will be approximately one-fourth of that. I have reviewed our proposal with Ron Quanbeck at the V^atershed District. His concerns center on the storm water storage south of this property, on Kelly Avenue. There was a study done in 1972 to solve some of that problem, however none of the recommendations were instituted. There apparently is ^no significant property damage, only flooding of the street and ^ow lands. The expansion will not increase that runoff# an ma^ decrease the 100-year runoff level of the rirst low area by 1/lOth of a foot." Bellows stated that the building elevations need to provided. She said, "The wall on the southwest corner of the - 4 - Rl.. - --- - 1 ■iJhiMiMeii 1 f ■ ; V \FEi- ^ ■^ - «:■_■' ■ ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 19, 1990 ZONING FILE #1600-RICK'S SOPER VALO CONTINUED building is 14' nigh. That is a very steep slope coming from a ve-y high retaining wall. The retention pond is deceptive because it is really very shallow. The builaing elevations is an important element that we are currently lacking. Mabusth concurred that the proximity of the retaining wall to Kelly Avenue may pose a problem not only from a drainage aspect, but also from a safety standpoint. Mr. Brucs Kelley stated that there would be a railing completely around the retaining wall. Bellows state! that she did not think such a proposal would be aesthetically pleasing to the residents living in that area. She said, "I am also concerned that we are being asked to approve intensification of this building in the one corner that is facing and nearest to residential property." Mr. Bruce Kelley stated that screening is proposed for that area. Bellows said, "I would need to see what is proposed. I am having a difficult time imagining how screening can occur without the benefit of terracing." Chairman Kelley asked why it would construct a retention pond with more depth. not be possible to Mr. Bruce Kelley replied, "That is a possibility. There is a City water main running through that location which may restrict the depth." Chairman Kelley said, "The City ordinances require that drainage from a prooerty be handled by that property. Because of the great amount of blacktop on this property, that is not being done. I believe that the proposed retention pond should be constructed to more effectively handle runoff currently^^coming from the property, not just that coming from the addition. Bellows stated that three-quarters of the retention area could be deepened without interfering with the City's water line. Mabusth asked the Planning Commission to consider whether they would recommend approval of expanding the receiving dock on the southeast corner of the store. Chairman Kelley replied, "I would feel more comfortable with the southeast corner of the store because the bank is located on that side." Mabusth noted that there are steep elevations on that side - 5 - it. > P^ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 19. 1990 FILE #1600-RICK’S SUPER VALU CONTINUED *f"the building as well. Mr. Blooraquist said, "There is currently grass on the 30' hill* If the exoansion took place on the southeast side of the building, it would be necessary to blacktop a portion of the hill." Bellows asked whether it would be possible to locate the addition further north on the east side of the building. Mr. Fuller stated that there are utility issuer :long the east side of the building. He said, "It is very exp^ -j:/e to move the utilities. We had initially looked at that and decided that it would be cost prohibitive to expand on that side of the building." Mr. Fuller referred the Planning Commission.to the sketch of the interior layout of the store. He said, "The proposal before you this evening is the plan that will best work with the existing layout of the store. We do realize that there is a problem with the elevations along the southwest side of the building. We will need to address the Fire Code requirements. The addition will also include a trash compactor." Bellows and Chairman Kelley asked what level of noise will be generated from the trash compactor, how many times a day it will ooerate, and how often it will need to be picked up. Mr. Bloomquist replied, "I am estimating that the trash would be picked up once a week. TJie compactor will probably function six or seven times a day. I am not sure wh--t the noise level is." Chairman Kelley ashed whether it would^ be possible to relocate the trash compactor to the east side of the building. Mr. Fuller replied, "That may be possible. With regard to the noise issue, please remember that the Keaveny building is between Rick's and the residential area." Mabusth depicted for tha Planning Commission residential area is located in relation to the properties. where the commercial Johnson asked whether it would be realistic to dead-end Kelly Avenue witn a cul-da-sac. Mabusth said, "Nearly all residents from that area, to which I have spoken, have indicated that they would like Kelly Avenue closed off as a through road. The access is too close to the intersection of Count-/ Road 15 and 19. Attempts to move west - 6 - 'tteiti I'l I ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 19, 199U ZONING FILE #1600-RICK'S SOPER VALD CONTINUED from the intersection are restricted by cars slowing down for signal at the County Road 15 and 19 intersection. There are issues that would need to be addressed such as emergency vehicle response time. This issue would be a separate vacation application. I believe it makes sense." Johnson said, "I too think it makes sense. I think it would make this setback Variance a bit more palatable if Kelly Avenue were vacated." Mabusth added that there would also be more room for parking if Kelly Avenue were vacated. Chairman Kelley said, "I think we should proceed with this application with the premise that the road is not going to be closed." Johnson said, "It would be possible for Mr. Bloomquist to petition the City to vacate Kelly Avenue. That is an option available to him." Chairman Kelley asked how long a vacation process would take to complete. Mabusth reolied, "If it is Mr. Bloomquist's wish to pursue the vacation, it would be possible for t.he Public Hearing to be held at the January Planning Commission meeting." Johnson said, "In my opinion, the vacation of Kelly Avenue is required if the Super Valu expansion is to occur." Bellows, Moos. Hanson and Cohen concurred with Johnson. Chairman Kelley said, "There is additional information that we need in addition to the vacation. We need to see the elevations, sketch plans on screening and retaining wal-s, and the design for the retention pond. It will be necessary to consider what impact on drainage there may be if Kelly Avenue is vacated." There were no comments from the public and the Public Hearing was closed. It was moved by Kelley, application #1600, Rick's Super Motion carried. seconded by Moos, to table Valu. Motion, Ayas-6, Nays-0. - 7 - /t' CITY OP ORONO P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 473-7357 ZONING PILE #1600 55323 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice: 11/27/90 TO:Richard Bloomquist 3333 Shoreline Drive Orono, MN 55392 COPIES TO MGT Company Martin Ehlers, President P.O. Box 437 Redwood Falls, MN 56283 Bruce Kelley Flanmark P.O. Box 1243 Minneapolis, MN 55440 Lyle Fuller Super Valu Stores, Inc. P.O. Box 1451 Minneapolis, MN 55440 TYPE OP APPLICATION: Variances/Conunercial Site Plan Review DATE OP MEETING: 11/19/90 VOTE: 6 For 0 Against Planning Comission recommends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: \c 1. Side street setback on west side is excessive. Applicant is asked to relocate trash compactor to east side of building. 2. Applicant is to provide detail on retaining wall and west elevations and south elevations of retaining wall. !w- A. >. 3. Provide elevations of building to include receiving dock. w . ■.-.I. . 4. Applicant is encouraged to submit an addendum to respond.to suggestions made by staff to limit use of parking area for special sales, etc. Some members felt the 26 stall variance excessive, others had no objections. In general, it was staff's understanding that the Planning Commission asked you to consider a reduction in the size of the expansion in order to minimize impact on adjacent residential. Please provide in that same addendum, additional supportive information regarding need for the specific size of this addition. In addition, staff would recommend that you document the reasons as to why the receiving dock cannot be relocated on the east side. The Zoning staff has discussed proposed vacation of Kelly Avenue at the north end and comprehensive storm sewer improvement for the Kelly Avenue watershed. The City Administrator will seek further direction from the Council regarding a comprehensive look at the Kelly Avenue area to determine suitable location for a cul-de-sac and the types of storm sewer improvements that may be considered. The City staff may not be able to iiirfiihi rmirt ffi • Planning Commission Action Notice #1600 November 21, 1990 Page 2 receive final direction until later in 1991, possibly the meeting of the Council on January 28, 1991. Staff will keep you apprised of the status of that request. The City Administrator has advised that he may seek further direction from the consultant planner for the City, John Shardlow. Please contact above directives. office if you have any questions pertaining to the As of this writing, staff has not received a preliminary report from the City Engineer. In earlier discussions with Cook, he advised that he could not confirm that runoff from the addition will be offset by retention facility as design/specs, etc. had not been provided. Staff will send a copy of his report within the next week. Isv [iriV- »i ^ • I m M .. k. I A F' January 4, 1991 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth CITY OF ORONO Building and Zoning Administrator Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RET?\IlrSUPPOKl ------HI-------- SUPER VALU STORES. INC. P 0. BOX 1451 • MiNNEAPOUS. MN 55440 Dear Ms. Mabusth, During our planning commission meeting to expand Rick's Super Valu, the issue of vacation of Kelly Avenue has come up. I have researched this to a point, with Rick, our landlord, and the adjacent property owner, and have concluded that we do not want to be placed in the position of petitioning the city for partial vacation of Kelly Avenue. In discussing this with Dick Keaveny, he mentioned that in the 1975 time frame when this was proposed, the homeowners became so irate that several boycotted his drug store because they thought he was spearheading the vacation. Needless to say, no retailer wants anything to do with this sort of controversy. I have looked very closely at the "Avenue" and have trouble as to where the cul-de-sac would be placed. Access continues to be needed to the back of the Keaveny property, as business is conducted in space on this lower level every day. I have also noticed the school bus is routed on Kelly, and indeed many residents use this outlet onto County Road 15. I would also have concern for timely police and fire protection to those residents off of Kelly Avenue. In my estimation, the feasability for vacation is remote. However, if there is something I do not understand, or information I do not have which impacts on this vacation, I am willing to support the city on this issue if they wish to vacate. I have discussed this with the land owner and also with Rick, and both of them would be supportive of the city if the vacation fits with your approved comprehensive city plan. Would you please provide planning and council members with a copy of this letter, so they understand our position on this matter as it relates to our expansion proposal presently before the city. Thank you for your interest in this matter. LyTe V. Fuller Assistant Manager Retail, Development > •» L.. December 21. 1990Permit Application No. 90-168: Applicant: Richard B oomquisi 3333 Shoreline Drive Wayzaia, MN 55391 City of Orono, Sec. 20AB Stormwater management plan for construction of an addition to a Super Valu store southwest of the intersection ot County Road 15 and County Road 19. Location: Purpose: Dear Mr. Bloomquist: At the regularly scheduled December 20. 1990 meeting of the Board of Managers, the subject peraiit application was tabled pending receipt of: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Hydrologic calculations projecting increased runoff volume caused by your construction for two lOO-year frequency 24-hour duration storms. Revised plan with excavation providing storage below the projected lOO-year frequency flood elevation of the adjacent basin equal to the increased runoff volume for two lOO-year frequency 24-hour duration storm events. Volume calculations of excavation to provide the additional stormwater storage. Revised plan signed by a professional engineer rcgisterwl in the State of Minnesota. Revised plan including erosion control installation detail. Information concerning the status of the City's ultimate plan for the subwatershed. Review and approval by the City of Orono. These items should be received no later than January 7.1991 to ensure your permit application will be on the agenda for the next meeting of the Board of Managers scheduled for January 17. 1991. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 473-4224. Sincerely, JAMES M. MONTGOMERY. CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC. Engineers for the District cc: Ronald S. Quanbeck, P.E. bt Board file ■^C\iy of Orono Planmark ir rrm-iii r • *• Bones troo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Cno G Bonesroo PE w Poier'^. PE jOiton C Anoef ’.t PE \Ur\^n L Sorwau PE P<f’jng £ Tj/ntf PE P Coo< **E Thorrjs E P£ Pooea G Scnurucrx P£ Su«n M EDefWi CPA Engineers & Architects Keith A G<yocy>. PE P<naro w Foster PE Dora<d C SurgjrdL p£ -erry A dourt)on P£ Vtjrti A Harion PE >5 < F'eiO PE V<Pae^ T Pjotrr-inr P£ Pcoen P P'e^ere PE Opvc O lsuocj PE Thomas w Pnefson pe V<hje< C L/nch. PE James P Maiand P£ Kenneth p Af>oefv>n. PE Mau P PcxH PE. Pooe*; C Pusses a • a Thorrai E Angui PE HoAijrd A Sanfonj PE Ojn.nt j E^'^eron P£ Mant A Sec PE p^ o j Caiv\e«. P£ •smaei Marrmez. pe Mart o xatffi PE Thomas p *ncefSOr. AIA Gary P Pytarvief PE M4es B Jensen PE L Phi.o G'ave* ill. PE Pere C P‘uma/t a i a Agnes M Pay;. A iC P jerry 0 Pe^TTScn PE CfC C C' vrr 3£ Pot^efT P pe Gary AT Mor?en PE Chanes A Er<kson Leo M Paweisey Hartan M Qson January 11, 1991 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 I I • Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Re: File No. 139-1600 Ricks Super Value JAW i 5 1991 Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the proposed addition to Rick’s super value. The storm sewer and access to the site are the significant engineering issues. The site access is a concern because of this hiiih traffic volumes on CSAH 15 and CSAH 19. Tiiere should be some consideration given to moving the County Road 19 access south to the property line and the County Road 15 access onto Kelly Avenue. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Yours very trulv, BONESTROO.' ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, LNC. Glenn R. Cook GRC.li 139.cor / ,1u- The storm sewer problem south along Kelly Avenue cannot be solved as a pan of this application review. This property contributes to the problem and would be expected to participate in the cost of any future downstream improvements. The re’/ised plan for Super Value dated 12/28/90 provides for an increase in the Kelly Avenue storm water holding area. The storm pond design for the increase in runoff from the proposed expansion is acceptable. The provisions for additional area to pond a portion of the runoff from existing developm.ent should be discussed. The City was concerned about the storm water runoff on the existing site as evidenced by the underdrain system that was installed. The benefit of expanding the existing ponding site diminishes if the City develops a plan to take care of the downstream problem. 233S SUtM. Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 B9B5 (/ rLniMMfIRK ARCHITECTURE I ENGLNEERING L « : ' I k 11840 Valley View Road, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Mail Address: Box 1243. Minneapolis, MN 55440 Telephone: 612-828-4500, FAX. 612 828-4743 f • .. December 28, 1990 Mr. Ron Quanbeck Minnehaha Creek Watershed District P. 0. Box 387 Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 '"/n- RE:Rick's Super Valu Permit Application No. 90-168 Project No. 1006.13 Dear Ron: Hprewith is a revised plan and calculations for the proposed grocery store addition at the referenced site. We have calculated the effect of two 24 hour 100 year storms on this site and the receiving sub-basin. cubic feet below the 940 contour for flood storage. The plan has also been amended to show details of silt fence, inlet protection and catch basins. The status of City plans for an outlet from the receiving basin is no *"ecent action." There is nothing our client can do to solve the flooding which occasionally happens along Kelly Avenue. The plan submitted will not make the problem any worse. Very truly yours, MARK Bruce R. Kelley, P.E. /jg Enclosure cc:Kent Oahlen Jean Mabusth (‘4 John Gerhardson Glenn Cook ' - Neil Libson Lyle Fuller -• Rick Blooraquist C'*-. I * ^ * '*; <■ stpaw bale (APPPOXIMATF SIZE le^x ia*x 30•) TWO stakes PE^T 0ALE ^INIMLM FASTEN GECUC^-T 3«:..S0 so* A^ri N' EDGE 0^ ’r^Ai.E A ^ (IN UNPAVEG APCAS r PATTERN bales to » E ON * IN J'JS PP ? * EC ^ ;■f DETAIL NTS EJK)SI0N CONTPOL BARPIEP at CATC-B as IN •o33.r:,r T- i r JL«« ST % \ X;1.< <tl lu Hi -K A .V >«r -j i„ t: Hi **» tM Ca-RD. 15 •V •r («> i V » »“ J •Jtl€ vidth ‘ N UNE TRACT 0 ,. - - r« 27"i}'yo r ic: 70 • - < ,>?o 2.-^, " - 1 Tr V -IP 53 ! - -------^ ------------------------------ tr X - ----------T;-; •■•1 ^ •A«llE»rwiTM TRACT 0 ^ / -.1-177 2^. --'4l a\ - - ■ « 4 I ^ 4«^.l Id i 7• * ! .--------r ; ft rr'I • • ■■ ; ' 4 * cv -’r :1 . % • \ .: o>- <■>\ • ■^41AW ' 4 N *.v Cl p ■• « % *>S 4^'\ r’ , ->‘^5 '<•< -• /,r ^ ' ♦ k \ f.' *• r <■ * - I S a 'V •f ’'V ^ ^ ^\ V • i \ \ \ ^ / "t- - -9 ' « '' 'iv ^) •!>4 <■■ \ Qs;0 \ V \ '’0,. ^ ,v\'^;%» ■ • V ^ *N ,4 *k \ layiia 4 ’-0"MAX. rAi JN cr. 1 —^ — -- 1 —1 VARIES NtLNAH NO. e 1733 FRAME 4 GRATE. (OR EQUAC) SET CASnHG 1/2" BELOW PAVING SURFACE AND FLUSH WITH GROUND IN LANDSCAPED AREAS. PRECAST CONC.ADJUSTING RINGS (2 MIN - 5 MAX.) SET RINGS IN FULL MORTAR BED AND GROUT ON OUlSIDE. PRECASl REINFORCED CONC. MM. AS1M C-478. I ur> /. ? 0' l/IU '1# ■ ■ ALUMINUM SIEPS IN51AHED PER OSHA REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE STEPS FOR DEPTMS GREATER THAN 3‘-6* ---- 5' 5’-4" ------------- CONCRETE TJASE. T’RECAST OR CAST-IN -PLACE. — #5 DIA. © 12 ‘ EACH WAY. y’*:©DETAIL NOT TO SCALE ’5-1/ CATCH e>A5lM/*uMr (S) LOADlMCn POCH r I / ----ortH .....vj>’ e '/v.s't \ \ * \ ! rn r M4vi H T * 'll »>'t / ‘|« »WC \ / V '>CHCDOir AO fvc w/ T4 GMAPe *1 .u . IMy. a 4£».0*1 .^1 --------------------------------------- / ~ f IUUf»- rC'f*-ATf-c^ rvc nrft W flLTCft FAISfAiC, » u @ % \ Cf<\C\\ FOP" AP-EA^rb* (v^aST) y/*' I cy >■'. ■* SITE DATA Eyi^TlMC. OUTLDIKJG f>.Pc I S O S 4- > Ufec :: 9o * Sf zs S!£ < c flLz Ui o UI r <ocr S Ui > >- U) •J < > os i CD i (9 f<co o u tc I I t2-‘ tv, w "ml m k. ~Z. SUPER tfALU Retaii ^upport January 4, 1991 ■Q SUPER VALU STORES, INC. MAILING ADDRESS P O BOX 1451 • MINNEAPOUS, MN 56440 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth CITY OF ORONO Building and Zoning Adminstrator Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Ms. Mabusth, I have enclosed Information which hopefully addresses all the concerns raised at the planning conmlsslon meeting held on November 19, 1990. This documentation supports our continued effort to expand Rick's Super Valu in Navarre. If you have any questions or suggestions, please contact me so we can resolve them prior to our January 22 planning meeting. Thank you. Sincerely, L/fe V. Fuller Assistant Manager Retail Development LVF/dt Enclosures Lt V, SUPER UALU January 4, 1991 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth CITY OF ORONO Building and Zoning Administrator Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 RETAllrSUPPOKT-----h:) SUPER VALU STORES. INC. VAILING ADDRESS P.O. BOX 1451 • MINNEAPOUS. MN 56440 Dear Ms. Mabusth. During our planning commission meeting to expand Rick's Super Valu, the Issue of vacation of Kelly Avenue has come up. I have researched this to a point, with Rick, our landlord, and the adjacent property owner, and have concluded that we do not want to be placed in the position of petitioning the city for partial vacation of Kelly Avenue. In discussing this with Dick Keaveny. he mentioned that in the 1975 time frame when this was proposed, the homeowners became so Irate that several boycotted his drug store because they thought he was spearheading the vacation. Needless to say. no retailer wants anything to do with this sort of controversy. I have looked very closely at the "Avenue" and have trouble as to where the cul-de-sac would be placed. Access continues to be needed to the back of the Keaveny property, as business Is conducted In space on this lower level every day. I have also noticed the school bus Is routed cn Kelly, and Indeed many residents use this outlet onto County Road 15. I would also have concern for timely police and fire protection to those residents off of Kelly Avenue. In ray estimation, the feasablllty for vacation Is remote. However. If there Is something I do not understand, or Information I do not have which Impacts on this vacation. 1 am willing to support the city on this Issue If they wish to vacate. I have discussed this with the land owner and also with Rick, and both of them would be supportive of the city If the vacation fits with your approved comprehensive city plan. Would you please provide planning and council members with a copy of this letter, so they understand our position on this matter as It relates to our expansion proposal presently before the city. Thank you for your Interest In this matter. Sincerely. Lyli V. FulltFuller Assistant Manager Retail Development MMNEAPOUS OlVeCN 101 JEFFERSON AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 8S343 • PHONE 1612) 932-4M0 ' * ' s. ¥ I': b if POSITON PAPER Subject:Parking Point:Ratio to Square Footage of Building The proposed parking for this supermarket is adequate. At Super Va1u we are very careful with our parking ratios and their impact on business. Ratios can be manipulated by size of drives, size of stalls, how the retail space is measured, etc. At Rick's Super Valu, we have designed and are proposing total parking of 110 parking stalls. On our design, we have 9 foot wide stalls and 22 to 30 foot drive aisles, which provides for very free and easy movement of vehicles. Prior to the county condemnation to improve the intersection of 15 and 19, we had a total of 122 parking stalls. Due to the condemnation and expansion, we have only lost a total of twelve parking spaces. This parking lot has never been filled and has provided the customers adequate parking. With the building addition and some extra business, the parking will still be adequate with 110 places. It is my understanding the City of Orono uses method "C" on the attachment which requires 127 parking stalls. We are able to provide 110 spaces. A variance of 17 parking spaces does not impact our business or the citizens of Orono. Please see attachment and drawing. » .UITTV,MflUl T, . .‘* c i'%tea RICK'S - SUPER VALU NAVARRE The following analysis Is proposed as It relates to square footage of the supermarket and the need for required parking as per ordinance. HETHOO 'A* Store Total Square Feet 6 stalls per 1,000 s.f. of building HETHOO "B" Store Total Square Feet Arbitrary 70% of space is sales area 150 s.f. of sell to 1 parking space METHOD •€" Store Total Square Feet Less the following non-storage/ nonuseable sales area: 150 s.f. per Parking Stalls LYF/dt mm 22,286 s.f. 133 stalls 22,286 s.f. 15,600 s.f. 104 stalls 22,286 s.f. Vestibule 13'X 33'6''■1 435.5 S.f. Heat Work Room 19'X 38'm 722.0 s.f. Mop Room 5'X 5'm 25.0 s.f. Mop Room 5'X 8'm 40.0 s.f. Produce Prep 36'X 16' m 576.0 s.f. Back Hallway 5'X 24*m 120.0 s.f. Deli/Bakery Prep 16'X 46'm 736.0 s.f. Deli/Bakery Storage 4'X 9'm 36.0 s.f. Lunch Room 10'X 17'm 170.0 s.f. Restroom 12'X 17'm 204.0 s.f. Office Manager 8'X 10' m 80.0 s.f. Office Cashier 5'X 10'm 50.0 s.f. TOTAL 3,194.5 s.f. Therefore: Reduced Area 19,091.5 s.f. 127 required stalls POSITION PAPER Subject:Store Size I: 0' '!•r-. Point:Reduction in Size of Building The expanded size of this building has been very carefully designed to accommodate the needs of the supermarket business. We have identified our specific needs of the interior and have designed accordingly. With this design, we get very efficiently, the following: Expanded Meat Oept. Expanded Fish Oept. Expanded Produce Dept. More Grocery Gondola One More Checkstand New Trash Removal System Enlarged Dairy Oept. Enlarged Frozen Food Dept. New Deli Oept. New Bakery Oept. Customer Service Desk More Storage ■■i Me have carefully analyzed and projected the size of expansion we need. At our cost of approximately $100 per square foot, we cannot afford to make a mistake. The present design proposed is very efficient from the owners standpoint and will fill the citizens needs from Orono for many years to come. A reduction in size is not feasible. Please see attached drawing. -•li' i %.■ 1. I *. jw (M I J |«wr 9^09^ ffmotm i»«#i ft II* • M it} ^PW wk0mi •i# 0 y m -.1 ...1/ ^ 1 Wyr^ -4_|_;{_i.il:ii'r ^.t ^.l-V-l; — ^ifl - I i’.»* " t t W V-#‘1’V I*-#* LJ 1 #•V-#'!•»1 - # » ig V..* ^ '7« I i !i 1 (O 9T|> I rt»i»i QEs“CiD“ 3 til <-'1 »»«#< MlW W titiM «r ”41^ .a %I .t f ? Mit ff^ngp M«fe^ liiiMi 1M »4or »m IPK Mii^f Ik M i»#»M M um^ Mt^M M rf«&4*< HV>r M a* M rM mA II [W*r4k ‘*m^tii 1#^ tMH 1#M IM 4# r^Uii PWM .f1 .itrtw^»“tsr-MM Mt# f*tJ •MM»^ »m4 n IV «■«. Mwl t la MM » MM •»»SM MU «‘tk* i»MM VMM tt M STPHt CV-TA kii«M f0%mp^9^ (ns)i*imtf - \ Mr TflWWr n[pniiiiii i„,ii u 4»yw__»ry«»«. 4 r POSITON PAPER Subject:Screening Wall Point:Purpose A wall has been designed which serves three purposes on the west side of the building. It serves as a retaining wall, a screening wall and a guard rail. The wall does not have any impact on drainage and is not a hazard. Rather it serves as a visual screening wall from Kelly Avenue, a wall which will abate any noise created during delivery of product on this side of the store, and a guard rail to keep people away from the grade change. It has been designed to smooth the transition of this side of the building from the back to the front of the building by using two elevations of wall height. Please see attached drawings. r ■ r -V.•. 4- ii- fr 9 *, * » •••* mM. 7^ ^ • • ■' ■ ■ ■*——~-- * !^rap^ * '^^•••* •••NNk • * •\ -^ ---------- TV ** *••»'" • •«•• •< — .\ PLflM/t/inRK II ItMVal^TW Mf><B*mn»M>.MK. Mil A4*«* •« UiX MbMfA. MU 1M« I til m4» Imi flS-tlMMl OTWTOBlillffi^lHWES^ ^ • TMb RICK ’S NAVARRR MN PI It-ti'to y«M>Y~a<rir>^ Z.'i NSUY AC* Appmot* ^35^et££M52^ r -Wa »:Ae:ioSOUTH ELEVATION to M*\tcrt epSIXf p>*rTi-^ .scfeeM -! wn:I. /'WAtV/ 1" o il%v/'\ly ii : ■ \K- i > /v/l IV » \ ^ H»'< (!M HtijuAoe> WEST ELEVATION ffofite «f (Wit H6W TTtej fc euod o^H6^ wriv-v • PLm\l/l/lflRK• AlOVTBCnfltll MMBHNO 1M VdkT >%• Ma M««. tot. SSSU TilTiiiii PMillMIMfO TVIm Mt RICK'S P-lNAVARRE, MN ““ ivu.^• 1 POSITION PAPER Subject: Point: Receiving Dock Use and Noise Issues The additional receiving door on the west side is needed to accomplish efficient receiving of goods in this supermarket. The design of the old store goes back to 1974. It has a very outdated receiving design and does not allow for the quick handling of product that is needed in the present supermarket environment. An additional door cannot be put in place on the east side of the building due to design and topographical constraints. We would have to move all our electrical panels, which would probably cost $40,000 +. Because of the elevation and space constraints of the lot, we would not be able to place a second delivery door and compactor on the east side. We have designed the retaining wall on the west side of the building to serve two purposes. First it will serve as a wall sheltering the truck well and also serve as a retaining wall. Secondly, it is designed to shelter the compactor and will be used as a noise barrier. The compactor noise, when it Is cycled, provides a very low level hydraulic hum, which will not penetrate into the adjacent properties. The truck noise of backing into the delivery well will be very minimal. In fact, I feel the car, bus and truck noise from county road 15 will be heard much more than our delivery vehicles. These issues have already been addressed in the zoning process wisely done by the City of Orono. We have a classic case of commercial property adjacent to multiple dwelling property which shelters the homes from the retail businesses. f.; I ‘ isH*. #• rsatrsi*) lit -• --------------------------------—--------------------------------- mV'V*H>* 0*1 In |%»** >»«s4»<y M) 1 1 1 1 f<M^ T----r w I i^l I ts >•-»• !•*• »V !!*• M* o^i-r ri» fi rv*.'| vv V-#*V.#'V ••V #'V-*’« i c» V-.* t I 1 r-> 5 ^ IS kSH a BEgP' (k) #T|P t¥^ li IT -fiF* “ ) . ° is> Hi e*KC f»<>nr>fp V«S»«Ilf HI w»«i »sc>r tb IS !»►. M«Ar IS IS IS»v IS u iiipp#g MO>r IS 10 i^MAi N«Ar M 14 fT«oa»>t VS n(#<r to«tu4 II li fM mA C%J*i*vfc*IIJH*IU* S^iMT Pi»M IS ISo^r IS <# ff0ts$t 900H .11 . HtfU0%l9$IU«« «s U*M lA# mu s vsss is ISM »«ir s«^s li 11 Sftkl s li PtS4 IW^• «•#«« s^^st s'.ll* §0fA0f T9U <«'»v* •Mi#>f IMM ss M .li STo»e n^T/« MkfS«s>IS. itiit Ms^snriid SlM St •r>4* »4ii ss«^u.fi*tr ISVM#S«S (S^)l*i|1«ss iHtUViMCl •ISW «r ^K4J«I IS kt 000¥0m s«i vs 0000tt i4 VS rnm^Itvs SW#W^14 %tS w 114 m — v< %—r »UWWVALU STOWES. INC. *_ i SOUTH ELEVATION + WEST ELEVATION ------------------------- /b &iitif 4 ( z'0(U7^Y tsCrtjN to MMKrt eiOJPH&\ .... f P^rriAo wALtx / pm*ircrsr A /\ v/ u' <J U>*t3ii-<> Htv< •a*r*>e>r *< hiu ftoe <: ppe»f*lv6 af (Wir new Tr«£J e CmOA o'(*.Htp. * •i\ ^ • t s *i ' • I i A» ,i ' i>Lni\iyi/inKK Aaosncnuti B^DOixM IM Vt*rf VW« Im4 Mm MM. UIM M*l AM«ii •« U4A MN. iU-OMSM «miIIMM4M1 RICK’S NAVARRE. MN PI I 'f! PUII%l/l/tf1KK AM3fffBCnjR£l fHCOfEEMHO IIM0ViArTVWvlMiiariiMi.MN.lS3M MaiMiMiiwIUjllfc—pifci.MH. 13440 TflifkM 4134)04100 rM4ll4)M?4l TUa PTpir*c NAVARRE, MN. Ami# P-4 POSITION PAPER Subject: Setback Variance Point:Is West Side Excessive Our position is. the request for variance is not excessive. With a B-3 zoning the setback required is 60 feet. The major part of our expanded building to the west is still 38 feet from the property line. This distance should be very adequate and not obtrusive to the commercial development to the west and other adjacent properties. The only portion of the addition which gets closer than 38 feet to the property line is the receiving area appendage which accommodates a delivery door and compactor. This area, for a short distance of 12 feet, parallel to the lot line, is 10 feet from the property line. Also, it is our understanding, that according to the Navarre portion of Orono's comprehensive plan, this is where additional retail sales development should be placed. Please see attached drawing. .l'-' niig A.- r SEVA6E, WATER 0RA1WA6S gSMT. T=L. 30X i ■ I ERO'ilON CONTROL FEhjCE B.H. TOP HYp.' 95l.i6S<\ 6" TOPSOIL AND SOD I RETAINING WALL P/VFTi ^ Wi^ i 111 I'l.® \-------UI-.V \^x V I west UWE of lot I, BL0C\C TOWNSltE OF UAW&DOM PAi ^ ^ \ \ \ \ '• \ 'bYhIding t \ ADD4TION AF'.F.^ st^od -■V \ '^ I \\ V -1 A '. \ \ :\VAv PARK --'rHi "TT^ REPLACE CLEARED FOLIAGE-^ WITH NATURALIZING TREES | AND SHRUBS |>LfH\l/l/tflRK j^ioinBcruREi hwoieewmo 11140 ViDfrVWwIotABka ?»•«<•. MN. 3JJ44 Iil4i] Addiw B ob 1243. MUuMpettt. MN. 35440 T«l«ha#« <1242»-ti00 Pmi 6l242*-«743 »frv*c MAVARRE.MN RAP SPILLWAYo 6* TOPSOIL Af4D SOO^^rTT^-r* :1 , r»/-sv. I L A - A L a k e She re e 31 ci € POSITION PAPER Subject:Variance Request Point:Reasons for Approval We feel we meet the criteria for a variance. We have identified that on this cornnercial parcel a unique situation exists. We cannot expand to the front of the store as It would severely reduce parking. We cannot expand to the east of the building because of topography issues and present store design issues. Topographically we have elevation problems and a lot line angle which precludes us from designing a cost effective and operationally sound building addition. This leads us to our present request. To be allowed to expand our business to the west on our parcel with a variance. On this parcel we also have a hardship which runs with the land. Our lot, unfortunately, has steep slopes to contend with, is next to an existing city street structure, and is located in an area where the city has not provided a drainage system to handle water run off for a large area. All these are impacting on the cost of our project. We are willing to absorb these costs and with a variance will expand and grow our business in Orono. Rick's Super Valu needs an onortunity to grow in your city. We hope the city officials understand our request and look favorably on our project by granting a variance so we can proceed with our project. See Attachment. • c c (. LAND USE PLANNING - ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION (Keep this page for your information) THE ZONING CODE is a set of regulations and performance standards aimed at guiding the orderly development and use of land within Orono consistent with the goals of our Comprehensive Plan. The attempt is made to balance existing land use against ideal situations. The code is the law. A VARIANCE is the procedure established to modify the strict enforcement of the letter of the law. A variance may be issued by the City Council upon finding that a unique situation exists, that strict enforcement would cause an undue hardship, and that the end result would be within the intent of a Comprehensive Plan. A HARDSHIP MUST BE DEMONSTRATED BY THE APPLICANT. The hardship must be unique to the land in question, or to a small area, it cannot be a common situation. The hardship must run to the land. Examples are steep slopes, lakes or wetlands, large trees, existing structure locations, and unusually shaped or sized properties without adjacent vacant land. A VARIANCE CANNOT BE ISSUED to satisfy the aesthetic or economic desires of the applicant; to simplify design or construction; to affect any building code requirements; to permit any land use not allowed within the zoning district; when the requested use can be located somewhere on the property without a variance; or if the result will in any way affect the public health, safety or general welfare. PROCEDURES require filing a complete application with the Zoning Administrator 25 days before the Planning Commission at their regularly scheduled meeting on the third Monday*. Neighbors are notified and invited to attend the meeting to make relevant comments. The City Council does ask that applicants have surrounding property owners execute an acknowledgement form (copies attached to this application) providing written confirmation that each owner has been made aware of the application. Please note this acknowledgement form does not seek approval or disapproval of an application. The Planning Commission reviews your request, establishes facts, and makes a recommendation to the City Council. The Council will then review the recommendation and approve or deny the application. The following information, when applicable, is required to complete the variance application: 1. The required Certificate of Survey must designate all current and proposed improvements. (*) See attached sheet for additional meetings and deadline dates. {OVER) r^;:. ^■'-.■;a..v rb •. ■- • . ■ f '* V •»-■- --.• >•; Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Date: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator January 17, 1991 Subject:#1604 Clair Rood, 2215 Kenwood Way Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IC, Single family lakeshore residential, h acre, sewered Application - Revised request for conditional use permit and variance to create a pond within a designated wetland. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G City Engineer's Letter 1/16/91 M.C.W.D. Letter 12/26/90 M.C.W.D. Application Review 12/14/90 Revised Grading Plan Hydraulic Calculations by Applicant's Engineer Planning Commission Minutes 11/19/90 Memo & Exhibits of 11/15/90 Revisions/Add j t : 'nformation - Applicant hcb slightly revised his proposal and provided additional information as required by the Watershed District and the City Engineer: 1. The pond is now proposed at a depth of 5' rather than 12' . 2. The pond side slopes have been flattened to a 4:1 grade, enhancing both the stability and safety of those slopes. 3. The pond surface area dimensions remain the same as before, i.e. approximately 1/2 acre open water within the 1.5 acre designated wetland. 4. The volume of dredge spoils is estimated at 2,774 cubic yards. The dredge spoils are now proposed to remain on site, generally along the south end of the site (see plan). 5. Excavation is proposed at the northwest end of the wetland to provide equivalent storm water storage to that which will be lost by filling at the east side of the pond. > it vT>.ef ■ Zoning File #1604 January 16» 1991 Page 2 of 3 Discussion ~ The City Engineer has reviewed the application from a storm water management standpoint and has recommended approval conditioned on adequate silt fencing and compliance with Watershed District requirements. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has preliminarily ]^Qviewed and tabled the application until preliminary approve from Orono (Planning Commission approval) is granted. The applicant's engineer has made the plan revisions requested by the Watershed District and has provided the engineering hydraulics data necessary to show no adverse storm water/flood plain management impact. Regaining Issues ~ As noted in the memo of November 15th/ absent any z^oning code directive that such pond construction is strictly prohibited under any circumstances/ if all hydrologic/engineering concerns are satisfied/ then the only other question in the granting of this conditional use permit is rather subjective; will construction of this pond and proposed grading work at its perimeter be compatible with the policies expressed in Section 10.55/ Subdivision 1/ i.e, will such work have no adverse effect on the natural environment qualities of this wetland aret? While there has been some neighborhood opposition to the ■proposed changes to the wetland/ the applicant has reiterated his goals are to create a better wildlife habitat while cleaning up the debris and trash duiiiped on the property over many years. Finally/ please again review Page 4 of the November 15th memo regarding the issue of the brick pillars constructed around the perimeter of the property. Please direct staff and applicant as to whether the pillars in question are allowed "as-is as a fence/ or whether they should be subject to a building permit or variance application. ty staff Reconmendation - If the Planning Commission agrees that the proposed work will have no adverse impact on the natural environment qualities of this wetland area, a recommendation for project approval could be appropriate on the basis that all storm water and flood plain management engineering requirements have been met so that there is no adverse impact on the quantity or quality of run-oft leaving the site. Approval would be conditioned on meeting all construction and site protection requirements reco^ended by the City Engineer and required by the Watershed District/ including properly constructed silt fencing and timely revegetation of disturbed areas. Zoning File #1604 January 17r 1991 Page 3 of 3 As a separata but related issue, staff requests the Planning Conunission's direction regarding the brick pillars. Should they be considered as a fence, or as accessory structures? Based on that determination and given the relationship to surrounding street lot lines, should the pillars be allowed at the existing 5-6’ height, or should their height be reduced? Do they need to be relocated? Should they be subject to a building permit or variance application? ,V ;V' ■ "s; V- ■ ■ l/li Bonestroo MM Rosene Anderllk & iy I Associates Engineers ft Architects OaoC fto«ewo RBOCn \V c Afxje^. H Monrrt I Vy#H. fcCh4« f ^jrrwi C Oiort. jrf QieAA t Cook- ir| Thames I Mdjrv I^OCfVn SChuTVCht Syt^ M c A Qenorx M w ►^wrr H DorMC « jHfy A |Ot/OOr> Mjnr A n|»ww •fg t ^1 McfMfi r «4«Amjivi PI Pf ?jv#lO PI ^ MrrfO^. PI* N/gcnee> C i/TcA PI /jfT^ 9 M^jnc. PI CehAJfh p pf M9hiP MPf ipKff C PvftAB* AIA ▼?w^fwl I Ahgui PI K9W9C A SftAM. PI. Oan«i J. CCaRW. PI Min A $aft Pf PMp J. CPM«ft PI nmMiMftmi Pf Mjn 0 wm PI Thpmwl Anflenon. AIA Oiry E lytiAOef Pf HW^ Pf I pnsp Lrf^vr- -e Mme C P«i/*vP! A* A ^n«s M f*r^ AtC P ^rry 0 Pwir» P| tfuioOlMn P» p PI 0/ urvim Pf Chenps A IfQ M Pe^^r riiiurt M Oh‘«i January lfti 1991 k ' • - ' «■: M'r'Y- •;fe. I. :• ' V 'V ' . ^ , aty of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Aitn; Mike Gafffon Re; Oair Rood Our File No. 139-16Q4 Dear Mike: We have reviewed the hydraulics information submitted on the Clair Rood SS i <» -*I .•• "5' r “ -SJ5 r.“SZ,™ « „„d .«i i * po.a N-™ u.. The stomi water calculations indicate that the high water elevation wiU be below 931.5 which Is acceptable for the ponding area. The excavation will not reduce the storage capacity the watershed. We would recommend approval of the application provided adequate silt fence is installed and ^te«h1d "qu"ts «e foUowed. Pliase contact this office if you have any questtons. Yours very irulyi BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:dh End. * m • m ^ 0 » n ilM HrltMillTH il I" * % IIJUHUHT ^£0 IWlSUi-^i-i^'.i-.'- IWr.Tl.ilS3*’:.:; p.o. Box 387. Wayzata. Minnesota 55391 / < r-» • lARC MINNCTONRA f • ^ i ^ ^ yt ■ ...1 L? .* » ■OMOOFIMHMEBS: Jamesfl. Spensieyi Pfes. • Jonn£ Thonias• RicnamR Miller Roban 0. Erickson • C. Woodrow Love • Clarkson Lmoiey • Itionus Maple. Jr. ! / : December 26,1990Pprmit Apniication No. 90-126 Applicant: Clair Rood 2215 Kenwood Way Wayzata, MN 55391 Location: City of Orono, Sec. 17DD . ^ j .-n j .• • Purpose: Dredging to create an open water pond in a wetland and till and excavation in a floodplain area. Dear Mr. Rood: At the regularly scheduled December 20,1990 meeting of the Board of Managers, the subject permit application was tabled pending receipt of: 1. Review and approval by the City of Orono, This item should be received no laicr than January 7,1991 to ensure your permit application will be on the agenda for the next meeting of the Board of Managers scheduled tor January 17, 1991. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 473-4224 Sincerely, JAMES M. MONTGOMERY. CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC. Engineers for the District cc: Board^'ile zCiTy of Orono Mark Gronberg Ronald S. Quanbeck, P.E. .'Ji i ■ ? ^ 0* tLim HbftitfitelUif December 14,1990Permit AnnIIgfltion No. 90«126 Applicant: QairRood 2215 Kenwood Way Wayrata,MN 55391 Location: City of Orono, Sec. 17DD Purpose: Dr^ging to create an open water pond in a wetland and fill and excavadon in a floodplam area. Applicable Rules: Rule C - Floodplain Alteradon Rule D - Weda^ Alteration Rule E - Dredging Exhibits Reviewed 1 . Permit Applicadon 90-126 received October 8,1990. 2. Grading plan received October 8,1990. 3.Letter from the District to the applicant dated Oaober 22,1990 informing him of the Board action cm October 18,1990. 4. Revised site plan received December 10,1990. 5. Hydrolo^ calculations received December 10,1990. 6. Map delineating subwatershed receh'ed December 10,1990. Staff Review Summary! The project involves dredging to remove 2,774 cubic yards of material from a wetland to provide an open water pond 5 feet deep with 4:1 side slopes. The project is located north of the intersection of Navarre Lane and Hillside Place in the Qty of Orono. The wetland is connected to Crjnual Bay, Lake Miimetonka by a culvert with an inven elevation of 927.93. Therefore, this wetland acts as part of the floodplain for Lake Minnetonka. S^il is to be placed adjacent to the pond at a slope of approximately 3.5:1. Fill is to be placed within the wetland along the east edge. Excavation is to be provided along the west edge to compensate for storage capacity loss within die floodplaih. It is undear from die informadon submitted whether the proposed excavadon is at the same devadon as the filL This project was reviewed and tabled at the regularly scheduled October meeting of the Board of Managers. The Orono Planning Commission has tabled this project. The next Planning Commission meeting is Janua^ 22, 1991. District rules specify that the Managers will review applicadons for permits involving land devdopment only after the applicant demonstrates that the plw has receivM preliminary approval from the municipality indicating compliance with the murudpal plans. Rec Table ffldatlQn: ing receipt ofr 1.Sta^e/storage reladonship for the wedand for both existing and proposed condidons beguudng at the runout elevation of Lake Minnetonka of 928.6 providing no net decrease in stormwater storage capacity at various stages. 2. Revised plan providing maximum spoil disposal slopes of 4:1 and revised silt fence installadon detail providing wire mesh reinforcing for the silt fence and posts spaced no grea^ than 4 feet apart 3. Review and tq)proval by die City of Orono. Project Review Statu.< hv Other Governmental TJnitsi of Orono is currendy reviewing this project 8 of 19 • . «.• ••• ff '. ; •■ fL: »’ ■ . Wv li- iJlN^ ■ • ^ ^ N • • • V .* • *. 1 Legal Desertption Lots 54.55.56. /’WALLACE'S ADDITION VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA IJEACH". TO THE I horeby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct super vision and that I am a duly registered [and surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. COFFIN i GRONBERG. INC. f*'4rk 5. Gronberg ■MnTTTmio .“T775T5 Engineers. Land ‘' rveyors. Planners Long lake. Minnesuca Date ; B Scale: I" = 50' 0 : Iron marker Bearings shown are to an assumed datum. (tfo.i) • j,pot elevation Mean Sea Level Existing contour from drawing by others. Datum - 9Jf- - • \ ■lO- 5»'i r ' / rv.,; h' « I a 9.. V %• . • ^ f . !♦ «•» ^* • t t f. t ■I'; *, t ■, iV ■ ■■ *|» wi; Seed & Mulch disturbed areas wit.tun 2 weeks after coniplotion of «.|radin<). BRACK POSTS AT LC%V AREAS SEDIMENTATION control fabric backfill on FABRIC 4^ « . I • » INOUSTRUL NETTING TOC OF fabric silt FENCE'OETAIL f » M ? 4 ^ . « • iifrtiirAiini ■ 1-------—>■ ? • 4 i 7 • : • • •• •<[•mm j m i m . ST/1.(r? - r. ra/iA(r^ . . /=VA . ^K/rr/jt/CL uA€ r i. -S £M£M,ityjiTfii. . z^KeA (Sq./^T.) . /A/rAfMezzrzL l/OL. ACCtzm. i/az.. • 9 • • • • 9 ■4 ' V.. j iT. •" » rv' n iT ?jlk> ..L... .1..4 fJASL^i i :o] ; i L Z.f. Fr.:zFOO Ja.rr. > 3Z..ZOO '* cu.rr. V * too " 87, /o o " JS, €^6 " '77, ^S,^ZS // yj // . • » —♦ —• »!• •—• . * . \ ;—; t ' • •■••• «• ? i I • • f ••• :• ; t . . '• i I ;. . I I • • .. . . 7Tz4.a f - Sr<sj^A ae . . .' lUf^TCAAy^S UAATFA ZFi/^C . A/fFA ) /A/CFFrA • f/ai.. JCC£4A^. yat. • •• • • . - *i .— <ni..L Wi-4- 9,jt;/...i.._ ..;___ O FF r . 4 y ... 2. y 2.?:. •*> • • • V ••. » •• • • • • 2.aO SAFr, 3F, yoo **. . 72^ a a d . 87, Saa " yd a 7l*fO 04. AT.’ 5jj 7SO ^ 7% 7 SO' *'• I 9S;8oO\ 0 Cu.r: csyo " /3J, 030 '' /78, JSS " 0 7 /Hd '* FO, 7*^0 '* /yOfifo " • . mfm. I ! i !»«.«• • i >• « .*i \7^^^TaA4(^€ yoLUMf. MAS. xcTaAuy £€f^ /a/ckfatfo f4/<d^.r^T XMyJudAAAHs . srAOFy . .4 ...i I •••■ « • * ■ 5 • • ! •* « • . .M •• • *•• • • • • « • « ». . «• • •• • • •• •• ••••«• • «• •»••«.•••• - r I i = , .. ..COF/Tyy^j^ - /A4C I • ••■«••• ••« ■••• *M • • •* •<•■«•••« • ■> •• .. .^. • . . •• 4 •• • • • « • * rnSm- .«4» .•••>« • • • ''':/ certify tiat this pien* spcciflcaticrt* 'r.'rci c v/es* prepared by me or under my • , s'/OiP.'ic-cn end-that I am a duly riCj.t:3* ■ • r.eleesicnel Engineer under the laws ot i d:;>. of Minn^ota. ' ' ■ • i - yy^ ^ ^*0 /Z ~Z<£>~F0 Rrs- »o. /47JS ir» iT i . i .——L... CACc^LAr/^Ajs rar . . nj J —:...L_i_.; . — ; . cia/a ^ood . * -I I t • . . .s** -- • * • • ^ I^}u^A lAyAjHE-^iAA6A. /A^xa . C^€.TAAaMS. r /OJS OOO - f^.f^T ~ ^7 A CA £5 . ^ ;C.,= ,o. yo . -L . j.rV'/sit^o-.ic-fi/o.. -. So A</'^ -XJo.= 3.Z •'■%<,.DEC 2 1 1990 LJU^x x.a\ = a. VO (3.2) 2.3.3S -! 3o. V/ crs I : : i ' ( I • I • 0 •• • — — • - • - I i I Ij------—. . ..— ..................... -......- "-ZTji—XSy^JcC.T^SiT^.i^A.^^ G/?aA^) • ___I J . * • ^ i I ; ^ATfA _^£i/£/ ........... •• -i.J-.i .. d.J^: AA^A ^_f<g ■ j:r. ) ^J, SO O \% ^ C, .3o o : I . /c^o ./tP.^^ zao . Soo . ■ (f££ ArM-Mfa Caaaa) /AACA£/>1€A^y^(. UAL Acrct/^ l/<fL. . . o C. r3 % 92^ r.^. ■ 7^ OOO 7C,$50 n ■ //Oj ^OO *' J% ^lo /, . ///^9^£? n 2g»,S7 o " : 3/.J,y^o • • Citrcfr Ct^rACL -ISo : ^. ~ ^i*0 t-CSd O CA^f fT/{ ruJ j. 92^, V .mi.O . ...92/. 0.3.S^07. Ua/t// /’oj AT 93o»o ■ • > • * * • » • » —< I at . .- f. L STA0f^TrgjeJf€ i^7Ttt TCaA jtr 97a. a 720.0.0. .S...C. .. ___SS^^i^o ja.rK ^.. 9/lJ>. . /.A..............n,/00 ... <9^650 922_i.(> .. .../.,Q .........2.^0. :. 9oa ff2.^........ 2-0. . //So spo. _ . . . iACi O .^r. i7,aoo " /l^oCSo '' 2iv,ssa " /S SrpA> /r^A^rr/a^ty. /lyy^ox TO C:/i/PA,y. BcfppAi'L cffT /9ec/j4?fAr/i;^^P€S70/' • \ . . SPfPt,L .OA/^S .. 30 ^So.*7l • • % Cl « < rA' f ^O. CAJ - .o...ri im r ■5 0.73. ./..3 .rs <'X 2X.25 Z.5 its J5 V.X^ ■O..ZJ .]f.fifs.JO.2,??; AV .7y 7o 22. 2.^ 7Jo ,73 3. 9S 0.3 i ..,2/ '.n <■.19 '-y .^y;.75 /?. V6 A 7 . *3S ,71 3.£S y_:. tiif.. • Zo. 1 /^.xy 4x .XX •7'’ /r.is .S . /SO. ,io 3.oi 0, 5. • \s^:C :■IS. ./r.7<>; ;A7 .yx.XX /y.<?<p .<f 795 , oj 2.79 .O*■.€.[.....,.ifs.n.77 X'S'.y^.y^ /2.77 . .^,<27 . .(?X 2.93 0.7X ,7? , 1 XX.zy.oz. /A /oAS . /./ . W. .07 1./3 • . Ao '. ^ 1 *fo:17.37 1^0 .3/.V J 7.c /£o .,oo /.SI . 0. ?: J A? ,ys 2'3.20 Z./.27 X. -•7 ys . 03 /.SZ . /.. QJ, l/.OO, . ? • So A/, z.z .2y 7.3 o • •y /7a ,09 /. 22 K i. . . jy. V xr.T3AO L.3 ,lo.'''X .7-X* /7J . ^y /. 2 2 A i-i .. : Ao . • • • I 27.37. z. « y?i*. V7 . - •£ , OA O. 9/ .*• •*«• • •• • • • JT. ^OHT/Ay(c • • • • r^Oi f . A S^J r ^ S/^irA ( . 7~o<y^r 9^7.^ /Ji/£louy Yc^j')•Ccm. /•".).. . ^c/rrcAo^ /C »»i—»■ ». •• •. . .0 . . .• 'V 0 . . . .‘0. . • * _ u •• •OA3 . .* • •o k J ; ♦ . JL-. fO„• •<. . 2A9 . 5 ‘^^^'Vzn o ■ y L_„ ./i • • • •.£,39 /OS 6 o •• • »• •« « • •. jo,xy .• •. . .. ..............oy . \. f...l..I : i?. . 1 • « . •. • y.. .J3AO . .£/CS ':.... <7. /X • . mm -1 S1A7 . .• 4...^^'V.7oyso \ \ . \.......oys. . i.....i. i?• •• • • •. 251^2 .«•«^^^V/£AJ.£ ; ., . .; PA^: ^ _ yo • •17,37 • •’^'^VzSAS7 . .P.S5 <0-: . : .4^?• •Z9,io .^‘‘■’‘/f/,6.3 . .. . . oy . //____ .5^^ • •3o^y/ .. .0.73 . ''Z .........ss • •. 29Ao. . .jy/ ... . C.A . . 'S ....AO.•. 27.77 ..'. PA7. fA. • L . XS.• «- 2XX5. •./.P3 .* /X......„..7o,.• %. • -. Zi<SQ .''”^75, 3 7//, /z« • • • • « . >cL4...71..• • f • • • « •"7^7,, , , ,. . /. Z . *- • •*! /X..7X . .« •.^^VtS.2(3. . . .. . A2X . /A: ; .• •/y. Xc?3'i7 . A3 • • •. /2.-77. . .• •^"^yysyj7. . .. . A3^.• /o,95 •77zy^yj23 . .Ai^7 2/ /AP . y. V?^^-^V/00A77 A 3f 2i /i?>* • -% fc-•X.2//O 2^ CO 9 /.y' % # • • - ! I ; . Tr^r) . SroifA^if i|4’ ... 1. IJLI • » . . \ //a : : 2lr i /iS. .rc •»! I: .21 _i-„. \ML U)t-lJ I I : ‘ \£e...LJ 1.. A-..|.. J . I..; : . .4^ : i ■ ji ^ 1.. jklJ Vi5 -• •■ .* ..i yja .1 .. i /25! J J /9a 7-3 o a f V7 * t I • • • • t I.W i, ‘ /sa /ss /€o • /CS /<c• ' < /7J 1 V- , 3. 9 ^ • 3.CS• ; -51 . ^ 7V . 2^9'^ . Z.f3 /.?2 /.S2 A 2 2 3 2- “ ‘ • j IZZ^ i .U_i 7>>« < /jam A rc^A^ 930, . ..^ /A/F<a C j (cps ) I«•# •• J ! I ... s, ; . •-•.i...1..... A L ■ ■■ S'. \ ' .: /O .: » # ^ • • * -♦# • «•»« •• : 20 . ^5‘ . lo ^• • Js .. «• • • » • • < i. “ ti'. r-i.i 2 • « • *« //i /t Yo......•• ivr . /i.. it f - -TX. :• . Co A /> f ‘../i.J....L t • ilk i-.-.— 70« « « • •« rr ,3^ .1^ ?s ' ya^ • • • 9^• ▼ «« • • m ■ •* « ; 22. 2< ‘ 2J /oc»<« # i- ! /fo • : ^ - 0.73 ; 2, ?? ....; ..Y. 2? '. yo^,. 69 ... /?. 77.... . • - -.1 ...2V,^2 -- .27,37 .. 30.91 ........ z%}o: .. 27.i7 _ .^S.SS' 2^.,Sa .^,../.9.y6 . ^ . M- 7S : . .. .J9.0O .. .. /2.y7 _ /^.95* ?. V3 I • • y.-i / l.So • -t------- 7 • • • • ft »* • * M • «0 « %•* • a6L-££j. - . /77^ y2Z y<7 7^ 92 o. ’*M/ /0 9965 l^y //o. 7/2. : ///^S66 . ^ \ ///, 33 9 \ ^ //Z.ZOC . : //2^y?5 \ //2, ^79 *^y//2,77p 5</72, 77tf ^^V//2, <C9Z . .. STO^Afif^ (VCf^rr,) o. ^‘V/ou - • ... .. 4 3003 . ^^P/<L<!02 . ’’*9/23,73.3 — ^ m^99.s7i ; ^’^y<r<c255; _. 7V7tf/^^ 73 / ""^.y?o;/73'.;: <^77 _ : 1^23.? j. . ^ '^^//oo,7/o . /ojyy9 /ox 2/9 . : / Y ./ -5^-? //3 /. y 5 /.i< /. y7 /. /. s as^ A5 AS ' AS . s y// ; .. ^UTAT^C^ /c/r) ; C : O. ft • • •••#•■• • • •• o.s ; o.pt - .J o' ^-9 : ...jc7,25 • i.O.35: i 0^92 0.6• • • . o.^s. . A 02. . A/2. A/? ! /. 2 2 . /. 25^. AZZ /.3 /. 3/ . A 33 . ♦ ‘ r • •<*«««|*«>* • ; YYj /"//Hf* 7/^/Y : /A//^/C/Cy c C/^f )r r ,i • • • . • . .^•■. • • . . 29. : ^ • # . . . ; .6.0s . ... J.2X J .. .. /lo 5.97, . f ■ . - •. 7 z5. . .9.S6 r . 4 z?t • • • • «/3o .S.*)S . ..ZJ: .. /J5 3. <^S Z9 . . /90 3. 09 . i • .. :/HS • • . ' • ft • 2. 79 i • • . :/Jo Z.9S ft [ .. .:j^. ../sr • • • • ft ft • 2.'S • ft •W'ss t • • • /€01':■ • • •« • « '•• . /S5 • • ft • • » • r . z3j. :/7^> ft • • • /. 2 i li'»: .;i<?: .:; . /.2Z • « • • ft ft • • • • •• *:"■■' • *« • # •• • ft • ft • r i-cy_r./^5 r/if /yCA/^/\ .y jaaoa/^ rjA. kCA . jyAA.f'/A'0 77/f yAA'/z e<yoc/ic U '*' ■rra<A/K... CtS/Ay5 A . 9 Jo.0 STMT/a^S S Ccc/. r- ) CC^T/^co Cct^ <• /79/ / /O 7, 0/0 /OJ, CV7 7vy //o^ 595 ///,3S 7 //Z, so 9 3^V/n, ?99 ^‘^V/fSy / J3 ^°Y//3,397 ' "‘//^3,SoS^ AS 7 A -/ /. V/ /A/i /. yy /, 95 /. H5 /. 95 /. C/> 95 ^f/^K /.9S ? O ' 9Z9.Y ytf A . 97/. o /X/ yf* /Ofa w< 3S. 77/5" 5^//f /^-^S5 re *73/.S £u5j^T/^^CLr . 7T/^S^ ^^/. 5 . ^c/0i^5 • ^///$ ■ /oO ^ Y/^6' Co/fCK. AS 6A5f Jti/,iA'/yrry>^/<A^ u/ /r// yuo ^aSS AA/" irc/AA55 l/OiiA/Af 4Uau^Se 9S/. 5 etSuy r/a^y, . r : ' 4_ • .«. . . i . . • % • ••- •• - ■ *•• ■•« «••— • • • Cy/^/^A^ / C/it/4/Ae/iCj /-^c. i liOTc:-.’/ certify tiiat t'i's plzn, specification, or report was prepared, by. me or under my 31-oep.-ie'en and that I am a du / Ro.a-o* iYcfessior.al En3;neer under the I?ws'of Mi, C(‘ Winnoseta.1 »'• 5.:m /Z. 7c/Rr.3. No. /z 7rs ' > • • « « K m:-r ../^ooo Ik /^/CL./A^ ,/rCP^l?PL^JA^ . (oaJ ejST^/tkT J/i>(_ af fia/uc) eS<oc^ JSf.S C9AyraL,€ f •- A’\\ fZet/. O/^ a:/4c o. pr:. /. s *» • A A . 7Joo Ja. rr. 3loQ . . 3^0 . . //t/CjefAiiC/L.-TMi ua 3> Ccf. /^r. Zooo CU./rr. .^rc£//>'t. ■ . ■ O cctJer^. <f3 2iT. _____ . /<^y lZS. '' :....L - 3?2 cu, yhs... k.. 4/^ Cur \ jfAfA /AJCj^ f/W rM i^ac. O \.^r. L - L..:/4: ^CTjO /. ? L/v- - •■- . • ^ /a/^?S Ci/.rr... ~ . .O.. ...cu^Er,.. . . /e, ^?s . 4 „_„: - S^z .c^^yuJT^ . 77'^^S./S. yC/^ -A^fPy • ^/a/ S^^/iAC f ^4/^AC/rT , ___^...1—... '- i ■ • • • • ». ,.. . *. • . . . ,.., a/r :fr^rAijJT/AA^ • ♦•• • •••• t'.;.0 Fr. 1 \ J " .f -A/if A . CaxTA L i/^C iZ, (Zoo ; //.> / % Zoo s " \ i3^ lOo . '' 9. 7.00. i '' > 3^,700 ><, i y6o ccA.rr. % // y/ . ACCHa>\. L/OlC^A^ f : ■■ - L . . . . O . fAA. fi-rL..., ,. . /%zoo :...^ $ . S/, sr.ao. /' . .i....j. ; . 7%9oo. o •_...L. •.. . . =. 277.9 eo. roA..^ 1. ; ^yC S^o/tS . ^.40OUf *337. sj » • • «» w • • *- *. 'T \ —• • -— i AZ€A r I •• i •• •» I • • *. • ! • ^ ^ ^JJT ■r •• t Z€AT/L \ JA£a l/OlZfM A k O TT.. 23co -T4?.E -2 /. • •Sooo </ 9 /.Z ooo P'6 #•7 7.00 K'^ •*30/ > 13 y 300 '> ZffOQ > *3100 >-iSoo Q. /^r. • • • Z " 6 '• P >' /f/ffu i t/0/.UrA0- . Z 7^ ooo CO. f^r. k • • .• •>•1... T otal 7%idocotyfir. => Z7€S /2, /Oo S'a.^r. ?3oo. ff ;^....^ i..^. . . : <3.7, cho co.rof. ^ jv/*fr 3f e)7c4UAr'3}u * COA/Sr*Oc'r/o^ ]Tc7/iroote = AAa/l '/79/ . • ‘/ZtCAOSe^ SA(CA/ZAa€ Af^yf; ^ C4T TA/yfAyy^^ — • ! k ■ & • 3ars2..s ior wcur.c:.- review anct?rr==-s^b^ l^led%r-S;r-c.aln Of title P-a^n^ng to tte believed that the application was forced anaad b">Uows set a comorehensive plan before making a recomraencat-on. ?oncLred Cohen and reiterated her comments regarding rhe commercial appearance of rnis greennouse srrucrure. #1604 CLAIR POOD - 2215 KEJiWOOD WAY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 8:30 P.M. TO 8:40 P.M Mr. Rood was presenr. p,c. The Affidavit of Publication and Cerrificate of Mailing were duly noted. Gaffron summarized the information contained in his November 15, 1990 memo. MS. Lorraine Moss, 3.335 Crystal Bay Road, e.yress_ed concern about Mr. Rood's proposal destroying the nd wetland. She stated that the wetland is a wildlife haoitau ana that she would hate to see anything happen to change i^. Mr Rood said, ”I have lived on the property for two years and h“4 setn Uctie wildlife in the wetland The extends across Navarre Lane has been there for iome time. When honcht ^-his orooe-*-v, t.ie house was unfinished. The bocy shop on tSe^corner d^uLpld' Tnil their trash in the _pond ^f=r -ny years I have changed my proposal an*^ no longer inwend -o dig P W a twelve® foot dapth. The army Cor? of Engineers sent me a better indicating the ramifications of doing that. My surveyor has ra-drawn the pvond and it will now be five feet d=e-, .vi-h^a oradual slooe on the sides. I want to excava-s the pone so e_- is some water in there. I do not intend to destroy any ot the wildlife habitat. I started cleaning cut the debris and found t.hat there is a 4" gas line exposed near the culvert under Naveurre Lane." There were no further cerments from the public regarding this matter and the Public Hearing was continued. was moved by Cohen, seconded by Moos, to table this application until further, necessary information is received. Motion, Ayes-6, Nays-0. Motion carried. #1605 DR. RICHARD LINDSTROM - 1065 WEST FERNDALE ROAD VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 8:43 P.M. TO 8:49 P.M. ' ^ The Affidavit of Publication and Cartiricate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. Paul Bedker, Dr. Lindstrora's Architect, and Mr. Charles Lindstrom, were present. Cohan indicat.ed chat it would e necessary for him to abstain from discussion and voting on this matter because of his profession.^! relationship to the applicant's representative. Gaffron reviewed the information p-srtaining to Dr. Lindstrom*s application (sea Michael Gaffron's memo date November 15, 1990). iT' \ lb:' w- ■ t •-;. Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:November 15/ 1990 Subject: #1604 Clair and Lynn Rood - 2215 Kenwood Way - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IC, Single family lakeshore residential, 1/2 acre, sewered Application - Request for conditional use permit and variance to create a pond within a designated wetland List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Cross Section Letter of Request Notice of Tabling from Watershed District Staff Letter to Applicant 9/27/90 Wetland Air Photo Code Sections re: Pillar Discussion Pertinent Facts - 1.The applicant is proposing to excavate a pond approximately 1/2 acre in area within this 1.5 acre designated wetland. 2.Applicant has applied to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District where his application was tabled pending submittal ^ > Vtp of additional information. As of this writing, applicant^'q^i^^ has not provided that information to the Watershed District. ^ 3,Applicant notes he has discussed the project with the Army Corp of Engineers, but has not indicated whether they have issued a permit for the project. This is not a DNR- protected wetland. 4.Applicant notes that approximately 1500 cubic yards of v excess fill will be removed. Staff calculates that a 12' ^ deep pond 1/2 acre in area would yield approximately 10,000^^^ cubic yards of fill, hence 8500 cubic yards apparently are unaccounted for in applicant's proposal. 5.The applicant is absolutely correct in the statement that the area has been used as a dumping site over many years. Staff inspection in October revealed debris along the north. A III I ill nMnAd**-— fc. >.r Zoning File #1604 November 15, 1990 Page 2 6. 7. 8. east and south ends of the property. Applicant had gone ahead with a bulldozer to remove some of that debris, and when this was brought to staff's attention, applicant was stopped and was advised of the necessary procedures to gain approval for continuing that work. Applicant had taken one or two swipes at the very perimeter of the wetland, however, it appears that very little if any wetland vegetation had been destroyed. This designated wetland receives drainage through a culvert from the south side of Navarre Lane. The outlet of this wetland is via a 16" clay tile that heads northward underneath the railroad tracks, underneath a portion of the house located at 3329 Crystal Bay Road, continues underneath Crystal Bay Road to outlet at the shoreline of Crystal Bay. This tile was likely installed a century ago when the railroad was built. With the invert of this tile approximately 1.5' below normal lake level, there would ^ appear to be a direct connection of this wetland \i’ith Lake Minnetonka. .:V While the Orono Comprehensive Plan mentions wildlife habitat as a wetland benefit, the Zoning Code basis for review and approval of wetland alterations, is primarily for controlling the quantity, rate, and quality of run—off entering the lake. The City Engineer has reviewed the applicant's proposa 1 and has walked the site, and has requested the same nformation as was requested by the Watershed District, in order to determine whether the proposal meets the required flood plain management engineering characteristics. As noted above, approximately 1/3 of the wetland wi3 1 be opened up to create a 12' deep pond. This may have a number of ramifications, both from a wildlife standpoint and from a flood plain management standpoint: a.Providing an area of open water surrounded by a cattail marsh will likely increase the diversity of wildlife attracted to the site. b.Aeration of the pond as proposed will tend to reduce the algae growth, as noted by the applicant. c.Depending on fluctuations of the water table, excavation of the pond could tend to dry up the fringes of the wetland during low water years, hence changes in the nature of wetland vegetation might occur. f li 'i-i i.. ■'. H' 'i* Zoning File #1604 November 15, 1990 Page 3 9.The City Engineer stated he would not recommend that the City approve a pond excavation with 2:1 side slopes. While this slope would leave a greater proportion of the pond at full 12' depth, from a safety standpoint, it would be nearly impossible for a child or adult to walk up the bank and out of the pond should they fall in. Most of the City's ^7 lakeshore is at a 6:1 or flatter slope near the shoreline, t Staff would agree with the Watershed District requirement that the slopes be no steeper than 4:1. i a® \' 10.In addition to providing the information requested by the Watershed District, applicant should be required to have his surveyor locate the 15” clay tile outlet at the lake and verify the invert elevation. Because this only pond outlet is underneath a neighboring property owner's residence (probably without benefit of a drainage easement), the engineering data will be critical in determining whether ^ J ^ • VTA.JLJL a.** -- - - - - - - - - - - Y construction of this pond and the general clean-up of this ^ ’<7 area will have an adverse effect in increasing flows through the neighbor's property. 11.Applicant has constructed a number of concrete/brick pillars along the perimeter of the property, with the intent that bushes would be planted cetween them to act as a fence-like barrier. Note from the staff letter of 9/27/90 that these pillars were constructed without a permit, and staff intended to advise applicant regarding interpretation of the Code regarding this issue. Planning Commission is requested as part of the current application, to review the Code Sections regarding fences and interpret whether or not these pillars meet the fence requirements. Staff Recommendation Staff would recommend tabling the request pending submittal to the City all of the information requested by the Watershed District, and additionally, information regarding the elevation and nature of the clay tile outlet at the shoreline of Crystal Bay. Absent any Zoning Code directive that such pond construction is strictly prohibited under any circumstances, if all hyrologic/engineering concerns are satisified, then tne only other question in the granting of this conditional use permit is rather subjective: will construction of this pond and the proposed grading work at it's perimeter be compatible with the policies expressed in Section 10.55, Subdivision 1 i.e. will such work have an adverse effect on the natural environment qualities of this wetland area? '■1 i'w Zoning Fi'.e #1604 November 15» 1990 Page 4 The final issue for the Planning Commission to review is with regard to the pillars constructed approximately every 20-30' on the perimeter of the property. This interpretation is requested by staff# since the Code is somewhat unclear on this: 1. The pillars in questions are approximately 18"-24" on a side, and range from 3'-6' in height above grade. Are these pillars considered as a fence, or are they considered as accessory structures? Zoning Code does not define a fence. Pillars are intended to have bushes between them, with the intent of providing a barrier at the property line. 2. Is the side yard adjacent to the street considered a side yard for fence purposes? If so, a 6' fence would be allowed along Navarre Lane. On the other hand, if for fence purposes the Navarre Lane side yard is considered as a second front yard, the maximum fence height allowed would be 3 1/2'. 3. Because the Code does not address nonencroachments for a side yard adjacent to a street, and because only the principal structure setbacks are defined for a side yard adjacent to a street, the Code gives no direction as to whether accessory buildings would be allowed within the required side yard adjacent to a street. In the past, staff has taken a conservative approach and generally allowed no accessory structures within the required side yard adjacent to a street. 4. Does the fact that the wetland parcel is not legally combined with homestead parcel, have any bearing on your view of this property? 5. If this property is considered a"through' lot, then do you agree that a 6' high fence would have to be at least 30* from the rear lot line? Attached in Exhibit J are excerpts from the Code which may help in your interpretation of the above questions. Please direct staff and applicant as to whether the pillars in question are allowed as is as a fence, or whether tney should be subject to a building permit or variance application. Isv m: » • fH.V, M IhoH CITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND DSE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address t/- rV/Z/C/Z 1 "■ T TV * T * ,T *^}f) UA ! t Vi CIXLmlU IT . f I IT I .X * *1 h_ W I i A Vkm /’I-, A - J I . • f » 41 • • * i Jk/V'M V WW !*♦ X CtJt rum-’t. t ruui n i. “v'iA Arl C V' V • w 9Ar» Mw V' • w Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) /7// 7 ‘/^/ OO S'/" ^ S'^kiK iW ;ii;i TIJ:: ! 0/2^/ Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name (2 L.^l tiZ. cf- / v >/</<1 Address Phone (home) Phone (work) ^ ^^ / OWNER (if different than applicant) N£une _ _ _ _ _ _ _ City CJ'^YHA'TAr Zip Phone (home) _ _ _ _ Phone Address City Zip Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL OSE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee i $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration X w ^ J T22r i Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule 0TB R APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Appeals Other - see fee schedule • . PRESENT OSE OP PROPERS Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: ;REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form. , wi. •Certified Property Owners List of owners within 3o0' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). * .r i Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if Ian alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above inrormation has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date- - - - - - - - - APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ^ ^ The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplie is true and correct to th^best of his/her )yiowledge. Applicant's signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE , . ^ ^ *.u The owner hereby ac)cnowledges and agrees to this application and turtner authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this retfbest. Owner's signature *Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on tne third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. •* . *.?' ..- •• \ 2\ (M) /7-//7-Z3 / V 2(13) / ■'-*1, -iS* ''^ • ‘•.f" .vV >v \ vV ii V —'.'5) "/>7 <o ;«• '^SC. » 551) MOTE I . »f*Mi»<eVEMT C^TS *1. *y. V.sr 50. 69. ri) 4 ri >r. ■ ,viu*c^v ttp#<io«* er*CH. /•?• <\,p .. 6 *V*L\ ^ 5;^^A^(»)\ ^ V « \ * V - *1^ % v^TfJT^r^ l' I ■" •., \f) <.'\.{ trs:- -r V-/ 1 0r^TSt»l B»» »0 >1*1 PMOIO t9») rv- rj (60) 4 3 ^ MC 30C » HawTro' C. :?:?.L,:3, ’y{'jr7>>''//'///’’. 7>y I J :o V*»>» V'®> ..(W) «) r* M'6»^ 5:^ - ti ■* / / (44) ■*r, /^ ' 47 y JV.l / )v— (3) OLD 3 U?A7S' O* /'? \/r4^ \ (’5)<7 *^a 9-J \__\- '(26)/ •»/w ''7'» , '96)/ns /:W «*• , 'V '39)1/^ ^*44 12 fUYj ^(63). T32)/' 3»-- (33) s 0>XoL^ A ’’X A /r <») o., iiA ^22),/|?Sr^)SLti *'4* A '0 '4^74 (84)/^<^/ >.v r9.:f4i A -■«»<»* )S „ OKiur •• •• fXv «> . CaUCT e (94) x» .*w ^ iT • • • • 4 • 4^ *? W w ;frt\^1 . so ^ J , , ,■■. '■” 5: RUN DATE 10/26/90 4 . BATCH 001 ..Ir*»: f PROPAODR OKNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ApOR AOOR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER KAHE/AODR I PROP AOOR ONNER NAlC . I ^ TAXPAYER V , NAHE/AODR y 'iV^^ ‘ • • i I ^1: T V'- PROP AOOR (MIER NAHE r TAXPAYER < NAHE/ADOR liJ'iv . ' . ^ ‘ PROP AOOR CMCR NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR ? ^ m..wu ■.5 - • / PROP AOOR / ; ONNER NAME 36 17-117-23 41 0002 02140 KENHOOD NAY CARL S JOHNSON DONNA E KABANUK f 6931 DALLAS RO ?LS HN 55430 ! f iV r *(. ' * VI ^ t 136 17-117-23 41 0005 00036 AOORESS UNASSIGNEO PAUL R HOLNBERO PAUL R HOLHBERO V 17961 9TH AVE N E POULSBO HA 96370 I 36 17-117-23 41 0013 03295 CRYSTAL BAY RO HARK C ZA6AR1A . HARK C ZA6ARIA ^ 1526 218T AVE N E' ROCHESTER HN 55904 36 17-117-23 41 0017 03315 CRYSTAL BAY RO J A TRUDEAU I J B TRUDEAU J A TRUDEAU A J B TRUDEAU 3315 CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA HN 55391 f i ' t i • 36 17-117-23 41 0020 03335 CRYSTAL BAY RO A LORRAINE HOSS A LORRAINE HOSS 3335 CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA HN 55391 til • I f • I . j h.' ■ ■ TAXPAYER NAME/AOOII 'Y i.i i ' t • 36 : 17-117-23 41 0023 03349 CRYSTAL BAY RO NARREN L PASCHKE NARREN L PASCHKE 14441 VXUA6E HOODS 6ft EDEN PRAIRIE HN S5347 » H IM \ i i \ •t ill: ,1 *. I : • 4 J^1 III fe-llii'i\ r» 1 * .« J i I A i HErtCPIN I» I 1 A '• f COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST * \ f •t 38 17-117-23 41 0003 02150 KE^6KX)0 HAY H L A J H PAASCH JAYNE M PAASCH 2150 KEr«»00 NAY HAYZATA MN 55391 36 17-117-23 41 0006 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO PAUL R HOLIBERG PAUL R HOLrSERG 17961 9TH AVE N E POULSBO HA 98370 38 17-117-23 41 0015 03285 CRYSTAL DAY RO THOMAS E MC HUE ETAL THOMAS E MCCUE 3285 CRYSTAL BAY RD HAYZATA m 55391 38 17-117-23 41 0018 03325 CRYSTAL BAY RO RICHARD J SIAKEL RICHARD J SIAKEL 3325 CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 41 0021 03339 CRYSTAL BAY RO PATRICK 0 O'FLANAGAN PATRICK D O'FLANAGAN 3339 CRYSTAL BAY RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 41 0024 03355 CRYSTAL BAY RD JOHN E KUST JOHN KUST 3355 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD HAYZATA HN 55391 1^;. I tr ‘ *• REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 1 58 17-117-25 41 0004 02160 KEtPOOO HAY S P OIHHICK t 8 OIMHICK STAR S TRIBUNE EHP CREDIT Itl 425 PORTLAND AVE MPLS MN 55488 . ' . t I 58 17-117-25 41 0007 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED PAUL R HOLhCERG PAUL R HOLMBERG 17881 4TH AVE N E POULSBO HA 98570 58 17-117-25 41 0016 03509 CRYSTAL BAY RO' PAP GUSTAFSON ROBERT HEGERHAN ] 3309 CRYSTAL BAY RD HAYZATA MN 55591 I 38 17-117-25 41 0019 05329 CRYSTAL BAY RO TERRYL A PEDERSEN DIXIE LEE HEEKS 3329 CRYSTAL DAY RO . HAYZATA HN 55391 38 17-117-23 41 0022 03345 CRYSTAL BAY RD ALINE K OGLANO < ALI»C K OGLANO | 5345 CRYSTAL BAY RD HAYZATA MN ST,391 • •. ' 38 17-117-23 41 0025 03359 CRYSTAL BAY RO GRECORY H LONG A HIFE GREGORY H LONG 3359 CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA MN 55391 t J ■ 4 9 • CO I « MUM -* <►• * j1 r \ •hJj > f: 2:I V* I J *T V •V f : J .•. 4 •••V ■ \ t • . ! - . ;; '‘f< ______ 6 1 .• __ •I ,J hM DATE 10/26/90 BATCH 001 1*1’ ♦* • > 1» H. r< 4 ' t . I * • PRW'AODR (MIER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR SB 17*117-25 41 0027 05210 NAVARRE LA CLARENCE 0 SCHRAPP ETAL ELBERT 6ir«(EL 5210 NAVARRE LANE NAYZATA m 55591 ; •V. “,v V • I > PROP AOOR OMCR NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR 58 17-117-25 41 0050 00056 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED DONNA KABANUK DONNA KABANUK 6951 DALLAS RD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55450 PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AODR i f 1:1= 56 17-117-25 44 0016 05565 CRYSTAL BAY RO J R LOFRANO ETAL J R LO FRANO 5565 CRYSTAL DAY RO NAYZATA HN 55591 If ^ PROP ADDR 56 17-117-25 44 0052 00056 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED OlfCR 'NAME j GENE AND SHER^LL BLOCK TAXPAYER (^NAHE/ADDR jf J»i. f ■4 ' ■ \ GENE AND SNERYLL.BLOCK 2505 BAYVIEH PLACE NAYZATA m 55591 : { ; •2 ' M' \Ul ; *t f4 I ^ •i PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER < NAME/AOOR 56 17-117-25 44 0040 02260 BAYVIEN PL ; JACRUELYNN J ZONTELLI t JACCZ SE6NER * 2260 BAYVIEN PLACE * NAYZATA MN 55591 ET AL . \ i . I ^^ V 1 PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR : - St '*''V se ■ 17-U7-2S 44 0044 00056 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED C N PALMER I B J PALMER CHRIS I BARBARA PALMER 2710 CASCO PT RO ORONO m 55591 . ■) T J • - : i, ‘ * f » HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OFMERS LIST \ V • ^» > f • 4 V 1 I • 58 17-117-25 41 0028 02180 KErAKX)D NAY C 1 H HEINICK CONRAD J 2 HAimEEN L HELNICK 2180 KEfBOOD HAY NAYZATA MN 55591 i 58 17-117-25 41 0051 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED DONNA E KUDANUK DONNA E KUDANUK 6951 DALLAS ROAD BROOKLYN CENTER HN 55450 58 17-117-25 44 0017 05569 CRYSTAL BAY RD J B DAHLMAN 2 M A DAHLHAN JON H PAPAS 5569 CRYSTAL DAY RO NAYZATA MN 55591 58 17-117-25 44 0055 02505 BAYVIEH PL R M STELLIfKl ETAL GENE H BLOCK 2505 BAYVIEH PLACE NAYZATA MN 55591 58 17-117-25 44 0041 02250 BAYVIEH PL CATHY JO TURNER CATHY JO TURNER 5016 ENCHAf4TED RD MOUND MN 55564 58 17-117-25 44 0045 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED C H PALMER 2 B J PALMER CHRIS 2 BARBARA PALMER 2710 CASCO PT RD ORONO MN 55591 # If.'i * '4 L 4. . -LUtH^LL. REPORT NO. PAGE PI455401 2 3S 17-117-25 41 0029 \ 02170 KEr*K)00 NAY OONNA E KABANUK ) D0rt4A E KABANUK \ 6931 DALLAS RO ■ BROOKLYN CENTER Ffl 55<«30 I « 36 17-117-23 .41 0033 IEDH STEARNS OONNA HUNTS8ERGER > 3128 OLD COUNTRY RO 15 NAYZATA MN SS391 38 17-117-25 49 0018 03375 CRYSTAL BAY JAY B KEISER ETAL JAY B KEISER 3375 CRYSTAL BAY RO NAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0039 02260 BAYVIEH PL JACQUELYM4 J ZOKTELLX ET AL JACCI SEGNER 2260 BAYVIEH PLACE >' NAYZATA NN 55391 ‘ 38 17-117-23 94 0092 02240 BAYVIEH PL 0 S HILLIANSON ETAL 0 S HILLIAMSON 2240 BAYVIEH PL .il NAYZATA HN 55391 < f I “I ' . T > I 38 17-117-23 49 0096 ( 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIOCO C H PALMER A B J PALMER CHRIS A BARBARA PALMER 2710 CASCO PT RD ' ORONO MN SS391 •I « I 1 '■ U’S I r. r <1. 1- I, j •)I * • 1 1. 'I • I •• • I 1 • « ! f ■ ■ (“J } . I • . RUN DATE 10/26/90 V r i . t BATCH 001 *• I I i ■>c r PROD iUMM ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER * i 58 17-117-25 44 0047 ** * 00058 ADDRESS UNASS1G»«D C H PALMER A 8 J PALMER ' CHRIS A BARBARA PALMER 1 i HAMS/AODR r A 2710 CASCO PT RD ORONO m 55591 i ' f • f'r PROP AODR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/AODR ' >’• ’n t . <> f- r 58 17-117-25 44 0055 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIO^D C T ROOD A L D ROOD CLAIR T A LYNN D ROOD 2215 KEIBIOOO NAY • HAYZATA HN. 55591 J •” Itf . f,1 -j. i•V? • PROP^AODR ONNER NAME V TAXPAYER ^ u V'NAME/ADOR ■ •. *1^. . HAYZATA m K • -i-i • . ^ "iS >r tW* f ‘ ^ ' ' ' ' ■■ Vi “ 58 17-117-25 44 0058 05220 NAVARRE LA RICHARD A PROUDFIT ROBERT J RITCHIE 1901 BEACH LA 55591 : . <! ■f f -'v V ' - .» I ^ '' I? ^ 4 •** j.u i* ;• PROP -ADOR ' I 05215 " ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 25 44 0088 LAFAYETTE RID6E CT -Hi V!-' I»a —S - < ^ * t CHEYENNE LAND CO OCrtllS N A JANE G BURGESS 5215 UFAYETTE RIDGE CT HAYZATA MN 55591 I »>1 } 4 > PROP ADOR .V*,OltCR NAHE i; TAXPAYER ; ■h NAHE/AOOR -■j ■ 't: « PROP 58^ 17-117-25 44 0091 05265 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT CHEYENNE LAND CO STUART A A HILDA J GOLDBERG 5265 LAFAYETTE RIDGE COURT HAYZATA HN 55591 I I * ADORVi. : I ’ Q»MEP NAHi TAXPAYER;naic/ainmT'’ I r *'■*1 'll 17-117-25 44 0094 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOHEONNERS LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOHECMCRS 1709 N FARM ROAD LONG LAKE HN 55556 V : I: HE»t«PIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM . PROPERTY OWNERS LIST Vs t • /. ♦* • I* t» 58 17-117-25 44 0048 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGf^D JACQUELYNN J ZONTELLI JACCI SEGNER 2260 BAYVIEH PLACE HAYZATA MN 55591 58 17-117-25 44 0056 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED C T ROOD A L D ROOD CLAIR T A LYNN D ROOD 2215 KENHOOD HAY HAYZATA MN 55591 58 17-117-25 44 0082 *02200 BAYVIEH PL DALE MATSON ETAL DALE MATS0r4 ETAL 2200 BAYVIEH PLACE HAYZATA HN 55591 58 17-117-25 44 0089 05225 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT JAB LARSON . JOm T A BETTE J LARSON 5225 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT HAYZATA MN 55591 58 17-117-25 44 0092 05245 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT CHEYEftlE LAND CO * DAVID F A SUSAN J BRIGGS 5245 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT HAYZATA m 55591 J i. f J 58 17-117-25 44 0095 00058 AODRES*; UNASSIGNED LAFAYETTE RIDGE H0HE0Hr4ERS LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOHEa^^ERS 1709 N FARM ROAD LONG LAKE MN 55556 ■h J' I ! f : REPORT NO. ‘ 5 PAGE PI43560I 3 .i I 58 17-117-23 44 0054 ■ 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED C T ROOD A L 0 ROOD CLAIR T A LYFtl. 0 ROOD 2215 KENHOOD HAY HAYZATA FtJ 55391 ; . t i* 38 17-117-23 44 0057 02215 KENHOOD HAY C T ROOD A L D ROOD CLAIR ROOD . : 2215 KEIMOOO HAY HAYZATA MN 55391 I 58 17-117-25 44 0085 02250 BAYVIEH PL J L SCHtlECK A P M SCHNECK J L a P M SCHNECK 2250 BAYVIEH PL S ^ HAYZATA HN 55591 ') 58 17-117-25 44 0090 ! 05285 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT SALLY J MCCABE SALLY J MCCABE 5285 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT HAYZATA HN 55591 t I 58 17-117-25 44 0C95 . 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGKEO LAFAYETTE RIDGE H0HECM4ERS LAFAYETTE RIDGE H0HECM4ERS 1709 N FARM ROAD LONG LAKE MN 55556 . 58 17-117-25 44 0096 02500 BAYVIEH PL JACQUELYNN J ZONTELLI ET AL DANIEL J SEGNER 2260 BAYVIEH PLACE * HAYZATA ftj 55591 * i. - •'i'T '■-W4. i . 9 f. s 1 ■U ?ll i tarn rfiiiiiiatta. ImnU. "S » • \ f ici: T jss;I » r % * J i:' • it k ‘ t. f i- i s . . ' I • t i. I. • \ * > * '• t i - i r I 1 '■ r- f, RUN DATE 10/26/90 jk ' /■ ^ * • .***•..■ . MTCH 001 • ■. »■ ;ii.;s4 ,'i. A* ' * ‘ • • HEt«4EPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0Ht4ERS LIST * S '* ^ * REPORT NO. PAGE PIA3S401 4 I ■1 » PROP AODR ' ■ ‘ ONNER NAME»■ 56 17-117-23 49 0098 03300 NAVARRE LA JACqUELYNN J SE6NER . TAXPAYER JACRUELYW J SEGNER.,. f./ NAMi/ADDR 1 2260 BAYVIEH PL , t .v' - :• 4''tr, ■ I ! HAYZATA MN 55391 ■I V;. PROP AOOR * l*h ^ • 36 17-117-23 44 0103 02260 BAYVIEH PL JACQUELYNN J ZONTELLI ET AL JACCI SEGNER 2260 BAYVIEH PL HAYZATA m 55391 82 16-117-23 3^ 0024 03126 OLD COUNTY RD EDH STEARNS OOtMA HUNTSBERGER ' 5128 OLD COUNTY RD 15 HAYZATA MN 55391 iI ) ONNEH NAME TAXPAYER%, • ' #NAHE/AODR f.• 6 . All iM f w•J t ’ 62 16-117-23 33 0003 ^ 03171 LAFAYETTE RIDGE RD C J DUNLAP AMO DUNLAP C J A M 0 DUNLAP 3171 LAFAYETTE RIDGE RD . . HAYZATA MN 55391 ‘‘ ‘ I*.} 82 16-117-23 33 0004 03167 LAFAYETTE RIDGE RD R A A M L FAULKNER ROBERT A FAULKNER 3167 LAFAYETTE RIDGE RD MINNETONKA BEACH MN SSiCl i t- /J 82 16-117-23 33 0005 03163 LAFAYETTE RIDGE RD SAD SIMPSON STEVEN R » DIANE E SIMPSON 5165 LAFAYETTE RIDGE RD HIFtFETOFACA BEACH MN £>5361 J «I 1 r “ t I 7 . i t .1.PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR ) ♦ ‘ f I • 82 :16-117-23 33 0006 03159 UFAYETTE RIDGE RD E P A M L OMEN ERIC P ONEN 3159 UFAYETTE RIOGE RD HAYZATA 55391 - (■ 82 16-117-23 33 0007 03155 LAFAYETTE RIOGE RD RAG SCHHEIN RICK L A NANCY 6 SCHHEIN 3155 LAFAYETTE RIOGE RD HAYZATA FtT 55391 82 16-117-23 33 0019 00082 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOMEOHNERS LAFAYETTE RIOGE HOMEOHNERS PO BOX 41 MTKA BEACH MN 55361 •• > ‘i 5....i .1, .ujife lOpiAboR^ '*" '1 MER NAME ' ■' LyPAYER ! TOTAL PATCH 001 0006 PROP (MCR TAXPAYER m- .1 I .rr. .4 I ; V.i: ’;NAHi/AOOR i , >, . 001 00063 ... :‘\i' r. ' ■- I 6. A ■# . J t 1.^ »* •I •* ’ J. ; • 1 \\ i !* , r Z CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE ' '.h* f REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS ; OF THE HEFtCPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST < « OF MY KNOHLEOGE AND BELIEF. _ ✓ . I DATE W * 4 / •/ », i . , . I 4 ‘ 5, i . I , i . ,F > • i r'^ ! t' ■• I •f 1 »5 ' ■. f• I': r .» > #r /i t- ■ ■ \k • T ^ i‘1’ M ; " Virtf/ (i OTCcrH -i'ru, I ‘ l.l ; •i ‘6 • •• ’ V:• < * *• •‘ • I.s. * »* V ' I . r • • ' I|- M <■ , t!. . . ! . ■ i ■■ ‘■ It .1 M \ ‘.r I » i i I : i i «i } t II p I 1 • i: ... I <>■ r'f i. h- !’■ *. K i' .la CLAIR T. ROOD / 2215 KE!TOOOD WAY / WAYZATA, MM 55391-9700 October 9, 1990 City of Orono P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 rr . .>•••' •••r » »\ M '\-y ' /I Attention: Building aid Zoning Administrator Please accept the attached survey and cross-section showing the finished topography of the pond we propose to dig. The reasons why I am requesting a conditional use permit for this new pond are as follows: 1. The existing area has been used as a dumping site over the past many years and is in need of a clean-up. 2. With clear, water and an aerator in a new pond, fish and wildlife could thrive and grow. 3.Through research my understanding is a pond with an aerator keeps the water circulating which in turn makes it difficult for mosquitos to breed and hatch. Also algae will not grow when the water is circulating which means if there is heavy rain, the run off which would drain into Lake Minnetonka would not contain algae, etc. The Army Corps, of Engineers suggest we erect an errosion barrier to stock pile excess dirt behind. We will haul away the excess dirt as well as the debris which may be buried in this wetland. We estimate hauling away approximately 1,500 cubic yards of excess dirt. Thank you for your consideration Sincerely, T- Clair T. Rood 1 -Vi iii f 5^ •^fo O'" « :* • *- 4 W « « li ^—* j fc— ** ^ I.* «« • I ? /\ r; ^ • 4 • •|g Ml 4# • M ate •« a* «te «> a* Ml te P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 lOARO OF MANAOBIS: James R. Spensley. Pres • Aiten L lemnan • Jctm E. Thomas RicDard R. MOer • Rolwn 0. EricKson • C. \iVooorow love • CLukson Unoley f-,.' I ; October 22. 1990Permit Application No. 90-126 Applicant: Clair Rood 2215 Kenwood Way Wayzaia, MN 55391 Location: City of Orono, Sec. 17DD , , , r-„ ^ Purpose: Dredging to create an open water pond m a wetland and fill and excavation in a floodplain area. Dear Mr. Rood: At the regularly scheduled October 18,1990 meeting of the Board of Managers, the subject permit applicadon was tabled pending receipt of: 1. 2. Calculations showing no net decrease in Lake Minnetonka flood storage capacity. Hydrologic calculations by a professional engineer or qualified hydrologist of the local 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 100-year frerjuency flood elevation. Calculations providing no net decrease in flood storage capacity below the projected local 100-year frequency flood elevation. Erosion control plan prepared by a qualified individual showing proposed methods of retaining waterbourne sediments on site during the period of work and until bare soil surfaces have been covered or revegetated. Delineation and area of the total watershed area contributing stormwater runoff to the wetland. . . uArea of the existing wetland and classification of the vegetation types present in the basin. Revised plan including proposed elevation contours for the area of excavation. Revised plan providing maximum slopes of 4:1. Description of and volume computation of material to be removed. Description of equipment which may be used. Construction schedule. lxx:ation map of the spoil containment area. Erosion control plan for the spoil containment area. Review and approval by the City of Orono. Review and approval by the DNR. These items should be received no later than November 5,1990 to ensure your permit appUcation will be on the agenda for the next meeting of the Board of Managers scheduled for November 15, 1990. :.*■ -i?,. i f ll • CITY OP OROHO ZONING PILE I1S04 5* ?“L»* MH 55323 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION "" "Le of Notice: 11/27/90 _ _ _ ___ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-——- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -* 'toVTi IIVIIII copies to: 2215 Kenwood Way Wayzata, MN 55391 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ type op APPLICATION: VarianceConditional Use Permit DAra Op'^TINGr 11/19/90 YOIBs « “ Against Planning Commission rscommends tie following: Tabled for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Applicant to provide additional information: 1. invert elevation and condition of tile outlet at Crystal Bay. ^ , c„h»ittal to City of all items requested by Minnehaha Creek f wltershed ^strict in 4eir letter of 10-22-90 (copy attached). Planning Commission tabled all discussion of the brick pillars until the application is again scheduled for revie . is January 10, 1990. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire certified copies official Plann^ng^^^^^^^^^ minutes, they are available from the city cierx by the Planning Commission. Isv 1 Permii Application No. 9()-126 Page Two October 22, 1990 Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 473-4224. Sincerely, JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Engineers for the District Ronald S. Quanbeck, P.E. cc; Board-file •^-Clty of Orono DNR •‘i t;-' >vv- tec.' •^- f .1^v .■V‘ •■*;•!••' . 'v i'i ■ .■m:mm ‘ ,.-v. >r"’ \I —arv^ L<OF aRONOr CITY of ORONO Post onice Box 66*Cry«UJ Bay. MinoeMU 55323 • Municipal Office* On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka September 27| 1990 Clair Rooa 2215 Kenwood Way Wayzatar Mn 55391 RE: Proposed Cleanup/Tree Removal/Grading Dear Mr. Rood: .,«r-v tuhif-h vou have commenced in various The general cleanup -ost uart be handled via a areas of ^^°^'®*,^A^ation permit. Our site inspections onstaff-issued land alteration that your property September 17th ® neighborhood dumping ground forindeed has been 'ised as a neignoo bottles, and decades. The concrete e debris that is not considered clean old tires, ail constitute deb„l allowed to be dumpedfill and by today's standards would not be allowed anywhere e.xcept a sanitary landfill. While we Wish to aiiow you to proceed wich^e^c»^ that the areas of concern ar- v ry . Before we can wetland, requires that ”® to continue, you must have issue a land alteration °surveyor,the boundaries of the “e^land defined and staKe y orono's wetland P^teotion ordinances do not within S^tlin^ds(Municipal code Section 10.55, Subdivision 8). we believe that the ordinary high wate m r^ wetland, which appears to the railroad tracks, a culvert that e.xtends ^'ojrt^rdthe raiir This culvert may be blocked be on rtilroad right-of- be on your *„Vd that^his culvert runs underrhrhor..''Sr33^%=rr^yt^al“^:rK=ad^n'’d%‘utlets at the lakeshore. Much of the <^ehris appears to be on ra^ilro^^ other properties ''hich County re t your efforts to clean ownership. While we to clean up other up the property, '"®. -Jpro^^al. I would also note thatpeople's property without their app a suggests that in, ord.r*tt‘Stly'’ort “f\he wetlands area during debris removal on iWLDINC a 20NINC-473*7357 assessim: ADMINISTRATION A FINANCX - 473-7351 FAX-473451* « PUIUC WORKS - 473-735* \k 1 i 7 Clair Rood September 27, 1990 Page 2 the north end, you will have to either other travel through the wetland, neither of which options. properties or are suitable road in the future), fences are not allowed to exce.d i/ height. such posts can yard (along Hillside p^rl) We are still researching this, however, you should be pillars^^and^iritYs ‘d^eterminer tharth^^maximum ^ height is in fact 3 1/2', your options would be farbct!-We-^A\%^/v^^a\‘arto^° /fn^aY i^ntlr-atUron^^o: ^tSi^ issue. in order to expedite approval for your intended cleanup work, you ohould do th0 following: «revL°us"^de\rJnr^ tte*l^e"a “d"Lrnd\7y “ ^ o Your surveyor should stalce the wetland boundary f^nrnximateiv ev«^ 5o",' and should likewise stake the 26- wetland setback where no filling, grading, dredging or excavation is allowed. Once a land alteration permit is issued, the following guidelines must be adhered to: 1. In areas within 26* of the wetland boundary, debrxs removal shall be allowed only to the caused by such removal shall be restored P/® ^i'^g^^all.levatioos. No vehicular or equipment traffic snax be allowed within the boundary of the wetland in any case. Clair Rcod September 271 1990 Page 3 vegetation. 2. in areas tSl north end Ji ^ within properties not under your railroad Sntil you supply written °^"?o^\\^Vor"su^\ lor^^ — * n?Xv ‘\' 0^”/°x “n"aVea TOcI, rhe'tir\ound ”5approximately 1,000 s^f. ^j^^^wed, subject to the use of ?lea“n £i\fon^^ with such fill not to exceed an amount of 100 cubic yards. 4. In Area #3, the concrete *"cfr^des. Public grades restored to match the surr(^ - culvert and gas Un^exp^W," and“wilY"be Jontactin, you regarding those structures. To summarise, once the boundary of a land setback nave been estaolxshed, the ahall alteration permit for filling #i^and n and include permission f®ajfes, only within your property restore to match written permission from other boundaries unless you P their prooerty boundaries,property owners to work within tneir pruu«i. i Please contact me at 473-7357 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Assis^nt* Planning & Zoning Administrator,s^ /je Bruce Vang, Field Inspector MPG/Isv “ ' HfTT*** 4 •* * *••• • •• • • . •• • •> . .-• • « • f J •J .3^ "/♦ «l -w* < i-M .1* 2*. >1 t‘ ** •» •• .• • .V %.• 4 *-.i > VI r*-* »• •’ sn «• « • i *%» 5 10.02 SZC. 10.02. DEZi:iITICNS.^^A3 used i.- this Ocr.ir.c Chapter tr.e following words and phrases snail n:e3“* .•5S-S«*5-“hS?5S'~ » --=-“S''S samfl^t and customarily incidental tnereto. 4. -Alley'* - A public right-of-way which affords a secondary means of access to abutting property. Source: Municipal Ccde_ Effective Cate: 9-14-67 35. "Lot, Corner" - A lot situated at the junction o^, and. abuttinq on two or mote intersecting streets, or a lot at ^he ooint of^deflection in alignment of a continuous street, t* e interior angle of which does not exceed 135 degrees. 36. "Lot Depth" - The mean horizontal distance between the front lot line and the rear lot line of a lot. 37. "Lot, Interior" - A lot other than a corner lot. 38 "Lot Line" - The property line bounding a lot except that where anv oortion of a lot extends into the public way or a proposed public right-of-way, the line of such public right-of-way shall be the lot line. lot \t shall be the shortest dimension on a pub-ic stre^— dimensions of a corner lot designated by the owner ana riu.ec in the o^--w3 o.. w.ie 3u--w...g Insoector. !!; i^rusr"'.; -s.s‘a: fiic in. lengtn, ot if Che lot fotas a point a. ...e -aac, -..a lot line shall be a line ten feet in xength within the -ot, parallel to, and at the maximum distance from the front lot line. 41. "Lot Line-Side" - Anv boundary of a lot which is not a front lot line or a rear lot line. 42. "Lot-Through" - A lot which has a pair lot lines abutting two substantially parallel streets, and which is iot a corneriot! On a through lot, both street lines shall be front lot lines for applying the Zoning Chapter. ,He Side Jiiand at the rear of the required front yard. ___ M . I. **ne».-ao+-" - A dedicated public right-of-wav not lass o7. ^^‘"■'”1", , • • V, a-~>^rds a c^'narv 3ieans of access tothan fifty feet in width wnich a.-ords a p—=>»-. abuttiwtg procertv. ~ aead-o" — atv ’'"^ivats wav set astde £0 '*5t*'®®t 03T Read""-- — ^at— siSimrr -ao— ■"Q*"e59. cuiar access rirty i.eeu as a permanent rtgnt-Oa.-d?a^. in width. „ constructed or erected, the69. ”Stttc-ure - An/-.h-..g^^^^^ ground, or use of whion reo.uires ; 3.io„ on the ground, attached to soaet.ht.tg -.a/-.g a Source: Municipal Code Effective Date:ft 4 ;T^ —X-» O i _ A ^-cu-'red ocen space on a lot,7 6. "Yard - a --qu----^ ^-oti its lowest grouna unoccutied and unobstructed ^ ® ..ae.-^'**-ted in the Zonrng lave 1 to the akv except as 1{,.-a at rioht angles c\a7ttr.” A yard shall tVecified i.-..'the yard to such lot line -o r;; .1:; lot is iccatec.to such lot line r;^ r" .^je-ich such loregulations for t.ne distric------^n.u. Source: Municipal Code^ ' Effective Data: 9-14-0/ - '"hose recuirenents which "7c (m ) Rscuirenie.**-S aT*o —ocnirec-he *si-e of vard areas wnen suc.t are --qu--- reiate exclusivexy fir®.g 'wit.hin specific zoni.ng dis^--c-s. Source: Ordinance 26, 2nd Series Adopted: 7-14-o5 77. "Yard, Front" - A yard a lot between the sid® ya.d yard setback line, street line of r-ov'dld on both street frontages o. which front yard ^a lakeshore lot shall not be comer lots and double ^5°"^-® ^ but rather shall be considered /frTo/ ;n; side of the building and a rear ”rd%n the%trers?de o"f the building. ^ - 1 va'^d Ivino be'cveen zr^Q natzura^.78. -Yard, takesnore A /a-- 1^- l^ksshors ordinary hignwater .tar.c on -y® - * “ ^ -f setback li.te, for the farx width or ...a -on. 79. "Yird, .’.ear" - A yard_ yard sethack line ^""“/^ear vard'shall be the yard which t.he lot. ® 3^g°Vet-««n t.he'street line of the lot and the required rear yar- sa—^ack • Source: City Coda Effective Date: 4-1-34 80. "Yard-Side" ’ A y«d “tendl^^^^ a^eVifild ln“h".®y«S riguia°tLnf for the district in which such lot is located. street. 81,'Yard-Side Street" - A side yard abutting a side A.' Sources ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 ■m -• ' *••Va •• •'/. ..•••.•> • • •• *--• ! .. • .-- • ..-1 .. •*.* '.. _________ • • •» - .*• ^ • . ». - • ►.*/ —V*. •• .••;*. '■ , • • « • • «k ■ • ••* ^ •» • »t * .,-• •♦ .• •• 4 • • *:, . '... * *v' . ’ * . —: --.4 •“•• :•;•• j .;: v•.. .vri;^ •••>•: • Subd. 5. Accessory 3uildir.gs. ■1 I I A. Tine of Constrccrion. No accessory building o structure shall be constructed on any lot prior to the trae o construction of the principal building to which it is accessory. J »« f D. Location. No detached garages or other accessory buildi.no shall be located nearer the front or street lot line than the princical building on that lot e-'ccect on lots which have frontage on a lake and rear yard adjacent to a street, accessory buildings located within the street or rear yards of ancn lots are subject to the setback requirements of Section 10. Subdivision 6 (B), Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (3) and Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) except that detac.hed garages may be located 10 feet from the street or rear lot line when doors away from the street and a turn-around is provided on site, ^his section shall not apply to lakeshore lots divided by roadways or corner lots. -I Source: Ordinance 26, 2nd Series Adoctad: 7-14-36 1 Location of Princital Building to procertv. This lakeshore setback shall be determined as tne mean horizontal distance between the natural ordinary hign water mark on the lakeshore and the allowable building line. 2.Variance From Lakeshore Setback. Any acclication for a variance from the requirements of Item 1 above shall be referred to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for its acproval before final action by the Council. Source: Ordinance No. 155 Effective Date: 2-14-74 Setbac.ks. .Accessory structures in excess of 750i . s. setaac.'cs. HCCSsaot^' — J * scuare feet footprint area but not exceeding 1,000 square .^eet footprint area shall be located at least -o reet -rcm ani- -Ow i— Source: Ordinance 72, 2nd Series Adocted: 9-14-39 Subd. 10. Conditional Use Permit Required, sory buildings on through lots located in "R" Dist require a conditional use permit. All acces- icts shall 4 •♦Tfl .. •••• —- - «• —• subd 15. Non-Sncrcacnr.enrs- considered tfU eicroachnents on yard requrre^enos: A. Chimneys, cilasters, lintels, “s n-ovided thev do not extendrVn d^:r’d-??..^.n:r..rn, .nc* « -r.in.-.h..- regulated. Name date signs for one famrxy dwellings; lights for Jhf SLcf sourle "of“ U?ht:=r illuminating carding safety and cr adjacent residentia.•isible from the pubx.c r-c.n*: o= .is not visible fTet of the front lot lineproperty may be located to wicn-n c. Fences st—t let line of lake fences not over 6 4 Jj-'’thoroughfare, if fill Is frontage heiaht of both fence and^fill shall required, whe wjta_ c-*. -** . ^he crown or the road, not exceed 6 feet s-^cs or similar strtettres, terraces, stets. In^ around floor level of ^Se'prfncJpal'^rildif, Ind'extanf to a distance of not less than 2 feet from any lot line. n In side or rear yards only, bays not to exceed a decth of 2 feet nor to 3°^fret,* fences^^and "^falls'’not fire escapes not to grade and open off- to exceed a height lakeshore lots, no fence or wall oyer 42 street parking except for ^®/®®2 inches in height above original inches but not Jh^shorelinl than the average f^?a“ent lots! ^ch^Ss "shafl not^ be Constructed within 75 feet of the shoreline. Source: Ordinance 9, 2.nd Series Adopted: 1-28-85 ■% 00-- vard only; balconies, *--2e=eways, detocr.ed • a^d -.creational equipment excep- as outdoor picnic shaxwS-o ga-.c-ure snail be closer t.nan regulated hereinafter^ : £7 fence cr wall constructed S feet from a rear lot xine JO7 ^-a-x a original grade. wit.hin a rear yard excsec a neign. o. 0 r. Side yards only: no accessor-/ structure shall be .-ri-on's\\^uCCei w^.S a riL%^^d^exlee^r h-^g.^^o^f-S le;fabove original grade. Source: Ordinance 9# 2nd Senes Adopted: 1*28*85 ^ • «• triangular area ifter"s"e«iti s'«eets, thence of the projected curb diagonally to a point thirty J2irLrm*y.^rolnr:f=“eV-7ng ‘r -b line, thence to the point of beginning. Source: Municipal Coda Effective Date: 9-14-67 A ri in1 i» • f I i i i ■! ’ ... 1 • •• %n . I * • ■i ‘I Subd. 5. Araa, Height, Loc Width and Yard RequirementsiLrt-i C Height. No structure or building shall exceed 2-1/2 stories or thirty faet in height except as provided in Section 10.75. be observed: B. Lots. The following minimum requirements shall Side Yard Lot Area Lot width Front Yard Side Yard Rear Ysrd Adjacent to S t 1/2 acre 100 feet 30 feet 10 feet 30 feet 15 feet "XU • r mS SEC. 10.75. HEIGHT OP STRUCTURES. Subd. 1. Soecial Provisions. The height limitations 1 mno<?<ad hv Other ocovisions of this Chapter may be increased by oo^cnal usrpe?:,it by 50 percent when applied to the edlowing structures: A. B. C. D. Antenna or antenna structures. Church spires. Belfries. . Cupolas and domes which do not contain usable soace . Ci • G. H. I. Monuments . Water towers. Fire and hose towers. Observation towers. Flag poles. J. Chimneys. K. Smokestacks. L. Parapet walls extending not more than three feet above height of the building. M. Cooling towers. N. Elevator penthouses. Subd 2. Conditional Use Permits. Heights in excess of those allowed under Subdivision 1 above for the uses enumerated "to^Se pS^aVa'^s Source: Ordinance No. 198 Effective Date: 8-22-77 Subd 4. yards: Additional Provisions. Required yards in the districts speoiJied shall be subject to the following additional requirements: A. Through Lots. Through lots in any district shall have a required front yard on each street. B "B" and "I" Districts: Adjacent Lots. In the -B- and "I" Districts, where the average depth of at ru»t?o ’n :^e^*’i'lni^™'’u«‘*lr^n%' ya?d depth * ORONO CC 391 (4-1-84) i I - ^ ^ • • ^ . .«• ;<•' t 1 --* •.• • • ••I*—- ,. « «b < • • V ..*• • .., • • • * . , i V. *^' ' ■•* . • • , ^ • f . — ••" . r-- -1 Subd. 2. Definitions. -• - •• • —V *‘v»* ••' As used in this Chapter; # •« «» I -f..—i •1.. I 1. "Aliev" - A public or private right-of-way of^those^lot3^whose%incip^ on some other street. vT:.;! • ■ • ^ r-^ ite • % * • • * ♦ ■ ■ h 5 building" - Any structure or any part thereof built foe the silppoct, shelter or enclosure of persons, enimals, chattels or movable property o- any kind. _ _ _ _ -1 •*V-- ■) I -♦ • * . 1v% • .V , intersection not exceeding 135 degrees. ORONO CC 419 (4-1-84) ' *V ^•r"' —.•«. - • »•_ ■ • .•( *• ••• * >* * * * • , e ■ •>■ ■•■ r ' .•■•►.»•'• •• •.V. ,.•; •.■•.x-'-., ; ■-; ■ ■• ■, ■ ■ V- f. .• >* ■ • • .-ri- > ■ V ' # • % • - r% •** • . • • •■ * %v.. • ■ - • • * •• »•••. • •*» * V* • • ‘ • • %* • ^ : : ,*v •» ••*».. •* • t . »• *<■.•-4 •. v.r----. --•;■;• ~ i-r-" ♦. •- --- ■• ■ • • A. A . .•* .* e * * » *-•». •••» •• , ^. . . ^ . . ,. ■ ■ «. • •*• • • •• '■* - »,••• -■• ■** ' - ■ ■• • • ■• • • •■• • .*f • ' , * ■ ■ * ’*. » - ' ’ ^ ••* .• *» *'■ ^ I*. —,—, . •. •••V • • ...V. - - w • J___________■_ ... ..• •• • - . . ..... , r" •' .----. . , 5' •- . • r. • •• • ".• •• Ki RIDGE 962'-7" EXISTING RIDGE 951'-0 il" :‘rj '.‘r* »-.< 2m J.EVEX J^RM^EL 2321-J.l' EXISTING MAIN FLDDR 938'-0 FLDDD PLAIN ELEVATION 93^'-^" mammmamm ^rnrn^mmm EXISTING BASEMEN'9E8'-10 “' kV’ To; From: Date: Subject Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning it Zoning Administrator January 14, 1991 #1605 Dr. Richard Lindstrom, 1065 Ferndale Road - Variance - Revised Proposal Note: This item was tabled at your November 19, 1990 meeting. Applicant was advised to come back with a revised proposal. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhitit E - Exhibit F - 1/11/91 Letter from Paul Bedker Revised Hardcover Calcs Revised Site Plan Revised Floor Plans/Elevation Views Notice of Planning Commission Action 11/26/90 Memo and Exhibits of 11/15/90 Summary of Revisions - 1. Proposed pool has been relocated outside the 0-75' zone. 2. New two-level garage proposed, totally in the 75-250' zone. The third level (second story) provides living space above the garage. 3. Second story addition and lakeside deck proposed to be entirely within upward projection of existing walls of house. 4. 0-75' hardcover reduction from approximately 36% down to 31.7%. 75-250' hardcover remains at approximately 38%. Discussion At your November meeting. Planning Commission indicated to applicant that hardcover increases in the 0-75' zone would not be acceptable. The applicant was advised to consider revisions placing additions in the 75-250' zone. The applicant has redefined the 75' setback line per the staff sketch, and placed the pool and its deck behind the 75' setback line. Existing plastic liners on landscape beds in the 0-75' zone are to be removed, as is a portion of driveway in the 0-75' zone which would no longer be necessary. Fy-' > F n Zoning File #16051January 14,1991 's. - »Page 2 St:a££ would question whether the lower garaqe floor as proposed will meet the required 932,5' regulatory £].ood protection elevation. I£ not, the entire addition couJd be raised in a split-level £ashion to accomplish this, but might create an unusual upper driveway situation. The second story addition in the 0-75' zone has been cut back to allow a second story deck above the existing house, so that there will be no new structural projections outside the footprint of the existing house. Staff RecoBBBendatlon If Planning Commission feels that the proposed additions and hardcover revisions are appropriate, then a recommendation for approval could be based on: 1.Reduction in hardcover in 0-75' zone, no increase in hardcover percentage in 75-250' zone. 2.Additions above existing house justified by location of existing house in 0-75' zone and no projections outside existing footprint. 3.Average setback variance justified by protuding nature of shoreline, with both neighboring houses having views totally unaffected by the proposed average setback encroachment. Conversely, if Planning Commission feels the revised request is not justified, appropriate negative findings would have to be made. Isv u:i * . r ^ • * M 11 i — *» •^.Ti ! January 11, 1991 Paul P. BedJcer, AIA 631 Fourth Avenue S. W. Faribault, Minnesota 55021 Phone (507) 334-4771 JAN 1 1 1S91 Mr. Michael P. Gaffrm Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Mr. Gaffron: Re: Variance Application No. 1605 Enclosed you will find revised plans elevations and hard cover calculations for the proposed addition to the residence of Dr. Richard Lindstrom at 1065 West Femdale Road In the city of Orono. There are several changes to the proposed addtion based on ccmnents at the Novorber 19, 1990 meeting of the Planning Ccnmission. We are proposing an addition to the north of the existing house on the existing driveway. This addition will have a two level garage with li\ing quarters above. It is proposed that the existing east driveway will be lowered to provide access to the 2-stall garage at the basement level of the existing house. The west driveway will remain unchanged and provide access to the 2-stall garage at the first level of the existing house. The proposed second story addition to the existing house has also been reconfigured. The projecting decdc has been removed. The proposed second story deck is over the exir*''ng structure and is narrower than the previously proposed dedc. The ;tent of this proposal is to step the proposed second story addition jack to minimize the visual encroachment sited in your report of November 15th, 1990. The pool and patio are proposed on existing hard cover in the 75*- 250* zone. It is also proposed that all plastic sheeting underlaying landscaped areas on the site be removed. s The existing hardcover in the O' to 75’ zone is 36.0%. The proposed design reduces this hardcover to 31.7%. The existing hardcover in the 75' to 250' zone is 38%. The proposed design reduces this sliq^tly. In light of these reductions in the hjirdcover on the property, the variance application is amended to seek a variance in the average lakeshore setback only. As you are aware, virtually the entire structxire is within the average lakeshore setback. For this reason, any irrprovement to the existing house would involve an application for variance on this setback. If you have any questions on this matter, please contact me. AIA w y Vw V fc...- - r*'. * - r ra ! ? ^ Cl i .r HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone A. H ouse s^'>. Gft':'mm Pw/“I B. Garage c. Driveway D. Sidewalk / F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN 'BY PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other LENGTH e>2u 2L> WIDTH Total Hardcover in Zone -S .Total Property A rea in Zone TZ '^O S.F. i.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S. r . S.F. S.F. S.F. ‘=l&4- S.F. a S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 3.^Z4-s.f. lO.-S-QOs.i.. B -in lO.-S'Qg ’ X 100 - % Jt 1 4 J i ■« m: 1 HARDCOVER CALCUUTION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' (^7T-21Q2^ 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone AF*T*£.T^ A. House X .• LENGTH WIDTH X . X _3 •X _ X _ B. Garage X _ c. Driveway U.901,« X .S C. X _a D. Sidewalk X _G.O a X . X e.C££tj3/Deck X . F.Landscape • X s AREAS UNDERLAIN BY X 3 PLASTIC SHEETING X 3 X a G. Other -C- - 1 *z $ K /( X \“b ”74 Z.a ; S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 'FCOU Total Hardcover in Zone IOZ-Z4» S.F. Total Property Area in Zone Z.1.000 S.F. B -im 0c::;0 x 100 » % '*1A-v rmm m 7. ' I I ^* i i 'ay* ■ ’ * . ■^' iliMllli 'ffH .. > Pcpc>u oexiHv m ■Sil W a . I • •*-»A‘Hx:> covtK • • J P»f5T fLOOIt. FU*N f^rCKX^ Lime2, '^1m>• «-i ■ c i, '^uh ■ -A#.*;- I'' i 7^ '^ :-v>^ j EAST t\.evATK=>s; L}\^5'3s- T3 % ilk ^jC oTh CLeVATlON* '..-■ k\IIIm/' L J ; ' ’ K WM y:. sm Uie.*oT £ue.VATl OM .* • ^ . '• ••; ••; ^ . -c wW^i ■ .< j-ii I:'l W' V'A> eLtVATI<&N \L mmm L ZONING PILE NO. 1605 CITY OP ORONO NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION P.O. Box 66 - „ 1 woe/on .Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 TO: Dr. Richard Lindstrom 1065 West Ferndale Road Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES TO: Paul Bedker, AIA 1978 Ashland Ave, #104 St. Paul, MN 55104 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Vaiiances DATE OP MEETING: 11/19/90 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against c.. PXannxng Cominissioii reconiBends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Planning Commission indicated that they %^ould not recommend approval of increases in hardcover in the 0-75’ zone Also, they did not offer unanimous support for the second-scory addition over the existing house. Applicant was advised to consider revisions that place additions in the 75-250’ zone. Note also that the applicant would be well-advised to have your surveyor define the 929.4’ shoreline contour. If ycu do not agree with the staff interpretation of the 75’ setback line. Please contact Staff at 473-7357 if you wish to discuss your procedural options. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the January 22nd meeting is January 11, 1990 or Febru^'-y 8th for the February 19, 1990 meeting. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. "4 JtM. P,.-- Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Prom:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:November 15, 1990 Subjects #1605 Dr. Richard Lindstrom, 1065 West Ferndale Rd - Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IA, Single family lakeshore residential, 2 acre, sewered Application - Request for lakeshore setback, hardcover and average lakeshore setback variances. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey, Existing Survey, Proposed Additions Overlay (corrected 75' setback line shown) Survey Compilation, Average Setback Hardcover Calculations Proposed Site Plan Proposed Construction Plans Pertinent Facts - 1. Applicants propose to construct the following improvements: A) B) C) D) E) Second story addition above east half house. Second story deck over east half of existing deck. Attached 4-stall garage. Convert existing attached garage to recreation room. Pool and patio. A significant portion of the proposed construction is in the 0-75' setback zone, including most of the second story addition over the house and ail of the pool and proposed second story decks. All of the proposed improvements except for a small corner of the garage, encroach past the average lakeshore setback line. . , .*c A , f ^X\ — u a Vj^ * o Irt s/ r t'- c' i' .0 ‘ \ -NXi < A J ^ 1 _ \\ I Zoning File #1605 November 15, 1990 Page 2 of 3 4.Applicant's surveyor incorrectly defined the 75* setback line from the current shoreline rather than the 929.4 contour. During a site inspection on 11/14/90, staff estimated the location of the 929.4 contour relative to the current 926.75 lake elevation, and the 75' setback has been redrawn by staff to indicate the corrected 75' setback. Detailed corrections have not been made to the hardcover calculations, although an estimated revision is shown below. In the 0-75' zone, the area of the zone slightly increases but the proportions of additional hardcover and additional non-hardcover do not significantly change the "before" and "after hardcover" percentages. In the 75'-250' zone, actual percentages decrease slightly because the 250-500' zone is almost eliminated. 0-75’ 75-250' 250-500' Reported Area(s.f.) Estimated Corrected Hardcover* Area(^.f.) 10,200 23,625 4,750 10,500 27,000 150 Existing % 36.8 (36) 41.4 (38) 13.6 (0) Proposed % Allowed Hardcover 53.1 (52) 42.2 (39) 13.6 (0) 0% 25% 30% 38,57f (C . ~ ^ 37,650 (0.86 ac) * Number on left is % reported by applicant; number in () estimated % based on corrected areas. 5.The existing deck on the lakeside of the house extends 12' out and is about 2' above grade. At its closest point, this deck is 33' from the shoreline. A 12' wide second story deck is proposed directly above the east half of this deck. 6.The proposed pool and patio would be located entirely in the 0-75' zone in an area that currently is lawn and trees. Perhaps half of the existing pines would have to be removed. The 480 s.f. pool would be about 30' from the lake at its closest point, with the nearest pool patio being about 24' from the lake. Discussion - Only rarely has the City granted variances for an increase in hardcover in the 0-75' zone, and that has generally occurred only in situations were the lot is extremely small and there are virtually no other locations for additions. This project does not appear to meet those general guidelines, in that the lot is nearly an acre in area, and additions outside the existing footprint could easily be designed to meet the 75' lakeshore setback, in staff's opinion. iSUDbi I *• Zoning File #1605 November 15, 1990 Page 3 of 3 Construction of a second story above the east half of the existing house may be justified merely on the basis that the house exists in the 0~75' zone. However, construction of a second story deck above the existing deck and above the east end of the house will likely tend to increase the visual encroachment into the 0-75' zone, wherean the existing low deck is less obtrusive. Approval of the pool as shown in the 0-75' zone would require that the Planning Commission find unique hardships precluding any other options. Approval of that pool without such findings would be precedent-setting. The encroachment past the average lakeshore setback line by any of the improvements, will have little significant effect on lake views enjoyed by neighboring property owners. The view orientation of both neighboring properties is away from applicants' residence. Regarding the history of this property, there were a number of cabins on the property prior to construction of this residence in 1974. A variance was granted on May 13, 1974 to allow a 40' lakeshore setback based on location of neighboring residences. A copy of the original application and Council minutes is attached. Staff Recommendation - In order to make a recommendation for approval of the proposed variances. Planning Commission will have to find sufficient hardship and justification to support the request. If portions of the project can be recommended for approval. Planning Commission should establish the magnitude of any hardcover increases allowed and should clearly define the reasons for denial or approval of the various facets of the request. A' m - -- ♦ s . t // j ' . ' W-X CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50,00 per each additional variance)»?/ a if Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application)/ / After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) A « t • < W V ^ ’ i:V PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Ll TY OF OROaO Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 0 “^ ^^ Flimt OFFICE Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. iM mi V Jk Vtutruzrv Ti i.1 ajLt\Ti nr*tr f\/s fc-A.w* • VV ;/» U*- u.* ■ W TELtiPT-rm Yst' /V \ ^ 7l'^'jJ50 TOOl hVl TIO:APPLICANT Phone (home) 10y ’^'6-‘- i f\\A (worlc) Co 4 2. • <=t XZ.Name Address ; ^'o4' zip; ^ ^ ^ C>^ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) 4TL>-C>N~^^ Phone (work) “Z. Address: Qt=.^b FW>rv^^«k\e city: Q>r&v^o Date Property Acquired ^ O<=.t:-o • .Zip: (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District ^ ^ Present Use of Property »\/*^V”T:k.v^v \y Residential Other (specify) D^CRXPTIOH OF R1 Estimated Construction Cost $ t' ^ Describe request in detail; Vso.c \A (A r o c^'‘l <^'7' .C“7^ - . -7^' I ^ J.*- o'* ^ wv O / w VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width X Hardcover Setback Variances (Front X Side Rear) ■£ ci'sti • BJOIOSHIP ^ Describe undue enforcement of zoning regulations hardship or practical (^^fficulty resulting from strict zoninq regulations: ^ 'a j_ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8Js"xll"). Slcetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8*j'*xll"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not cor-iplete if the above Infonaation has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of th supplied is true and cox ^s application, and certifies that the information ct> Iho ki\e r^st of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date xolzsha OmaSRS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members^and/Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this/ j/eaufiBT Oiimer's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council* If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building £ Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. w.V j ^ :2#:r t >i. b . :v MJN MTf 10/26/90 : k ' . . BATCH 002> . f ' - v j K : i *!. . -!., ■ . . .. Il ,• i. 1 • I ! t. ^ » • HEttCPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OI<MERS LIST PROPAODR I » t 38 02-117*23 43 0004 00038 ADDRESS UNASSI6NED I it ' OHNER NAHE ; LOUISE H LOHRY 1 NORMEST SANK HNT/kHPAYER ' NANE/AOOR \ C/0 TRUST REAL ESTATE 6TH t NARQUETTE r«»LS m 55479-0053 V* ; • f. 1 r; Xi. ' I •• 38 02-117-23 <»3 OOOS 00038 ADDRESS UNASSI6NE0 HENRY M SHARP HENRY M SHARP i. 1D4S N FERtOALE RD * HAYZATA MN 55391 \ » » • t 1; I 38 02-117-23 A3 0007 , •' PROPAODR • 01080 FERNOALE RO H CKtCR NAME H N ^HIEBLER A J F SHIEBLER '>4 TAXPAYER > ; HILLIAM N/JOANNE F SHIEBLER . name/aoor ; RO 2 . r _ . I.. , f FAR MILLS NJ 07931• M , "f :, 38' 02-117-23 43 0023 PROP AODR 01095 FERNDALE RD H 9HNER NAME 8 I K FOX ^ - ! I • * J-r 'r ? 38 02-117-23 43 0021 01065 FERNDALE RD H R 1 C LINDSTROH RICHARD L LINDSTROH 1065 H FERNOALE RD HAYZATA MN 55391 « * : ‘-I TAXPAYER * ; 8 C A KATHERINE H FOX NAHE/AOOR I 1095 H FERNDALE RD 'I HAYZATA HN H:!VI.,. j ^ ...i. * 55391 I Vi ii';-t.:. . ?• * , •1 ♦ » I !■ I a i ’ “* f • " ' * • * * * ■ j ,.1: 1b |5 h; .(• 1 ■ J t ;.<• . - il ’ / 'I; j;’>1 ‘ ‘ f V : *. ■ -■ ll ’ ! i ; ‘-J i * ‘ *Y/ ?•.* i ^ . TOTAL BATCH 002 00007 t H •i , M . '-If .1. y ' i : i REPORT NO. PI435401 ? PAGE 5 ‘ il • ‘7 I • ' •. I *. ’' 38 02-117-23 43 0006 . 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED LOUISE M LOHRY i NORMEST BANK MM C/0 TRUST REAL ESTATE 6TH t MARQUETTE MPLS MN 55479-0053 I i • i i ^ • i J 1 ■ .1• • ♦ * • I I • : ‘ >\ I •r '*. ,1^ ■: 'i }:■ • : . t * M : • '! i»• • t t.#■ V 1 .' I • * ■ ; • . • ?• - 38 02-117-23 43 0022 •i,- J ■(.» {■• J .1 01055 FERNOALE RO H flf J GERALD T MCCOURTNEY ET AL ^ ■ ■ . 1. Ui ,* • 1 GERALD T MCCOURTNEY • * • . * ;• 4 ,. « ••• 1 7 ■4 9^ HAYZATA MN 55391 } • * • '(•* ; • 3 * *4 ’ • « * lU ^ L :;*» (? . i’S ir *' • ’> i . • m4- ■’fi 'b? i 'Mr J ‘(•^1 • "iV I'. ;/ ! . •Jj’ ■ ■‘1 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE ' REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY KN0HLED6E AND BELIEF. Jllll- ilT^} I?'V *•’t J'■ ' k ? i .« A It 4 I ifX I DATE 0 *. '-ii Y Ci . / h • •.» ■’ J. I • ‘' J t I'Wii- I- r. ’ . . ii t I . 4 f •il! H. I ♦ I r •••*, •' % • • :p 6f * i ■'<V.1 I ' • (•i'L.. '1 1 • , .. 1 4 ■ J • 1 . o'••111.T » 6 A >• Hr W ' 1 ■1 « iI *1 J ■. .’ •> . il I ; ’ *1 ' *I -V i 4 'A i I .■* -4 <» V i » " :: W *■ • I: •'i ‘ •I f • • .■iij-n ■i tV • ‘.J I (T:) A. House • • /iwO *JiQrH HARUCOVE?, CALC'JLATIO.’i HORKEHcET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 75-250 E xisting Hardcover in Zone 9o- X 2S5 LENGTH WIDTH _ X 'Xncujctn }fJl B. Garage c. D riveway 17 D. Sidewalk ez 12. — £/CL^T^>iL'T O'O (}/ C I AMngPAPP^^ - S X ---------- UNDERLAI^/"^^^ X 2^ PLASTIC SHEETING - X - X G. Other Total Hardcover in Zone - He’^\o,’Zoo Total Property Area in Zone iJb.yteAiJhi. To' '■ ! •• '■ 250-500' 500-lOCO' s 'ZZoO S.F. S.F. 3 , S.F. 3 . S.F. S.F. 3 , S ■ r ■ •• » ZI2.9 S.F. s S.F. h Q S.F.t ) S.F. ;i.: - “?S4 ( S.F. ■^ix J S.F. i i •IIv^)S.F. ,'i.. 12^S.F. “fc S.F. S.F. a S.F. 37 5 7 S.F.T )Os2<dc S.F.T B l#-N X 100 3<c.6 % « f ) ?:'• 7 .-> J HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET / / SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' j4rT~^^~ Existing Hardcover in Zone }■ ■ A. House a o LENGTH B. Garage c. Driveway D.. Sidewalk E.Patio/Deck iez. pocl ^ "■5- AREAS UNDERLAIN BY .. _ _ _ _ _ PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other V ^ WIDTH > “Z- Total Hardcover in Zone - Total Property Area in Zone .■2 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F, S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S • F • r S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F •F. 0 1 O . -2LO O— S.F.E 4* I B ^ g^. X 100 - ^■% I lirthirt •-! HARDCOVER CALCUU\TIOM W0?uK5HpT_^ SETBACK zone : (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' (^Q>' 250-500' 500-10C0' Existing Hardcover in ^Zone (w> A. House --------x--------— |2cotS c.7e^Z!AA^^t» A.MC ’/i'pTW S.F. LENGTH WIDTH S.F. - X B. Garage - D riveway CtlWA-.MiO i'Y FifiLD ruAv/ty fy\ttH00i 6t ;a(T/^«-UtC LoT 0<»- ^ D. Sidewalk . X E. Patio / D eck - X I40fixu€ltl-'1 tiOS of PtfOii ^ -r?—' '.jfer o(C c«NC. souitc. F, Landscape S^LcEi-Z. areas C-? feif e»jc underlain -^, 1 1 I* ov . ' 'BY P'JNSTIC fe/fcsT €*>0 oA uovst r • I u sheetingq ^ G. Other Total Hardcover in Zone /7^^/Total Property Area in Zone S.F. > S.F. S.F. S.F. 75(cLr S.F. ETCC S.F* k ^yS.Ft S.F. 1 1 Ir S.F. *S.F. • 35 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 9 7^ S.F. S.F. B d-X 100 4/. 4 % liilSiliititeiilitfM 5 • m V V: ■ r-r-' ^ • HAMCOVE? CALCULATION WORKSHEET /. SETBACK zcNE; (cisccE ofiE) 0-75' (J3-ZSS^^ 250-500 ' 5C0-ZGCO' Existing K arssoves in Zone A. H ouse x « t C^C^O - - LENGTH • •WIDTH . .. «. zs ^a 1 S-^O S.r. ' ^ X j ac “2.a 1 ! -Z *6"• • - S* F • • •+ X , \ A-o __ S.F. X . w— ...• __ S.F. a. Garage x . • a S.F. * \ \ » *\ v\C\Oc^«?c/ ' c. D riveway ..................._ x a ^ 1 _ S • r # ____________X • • T • ^ D. Sidewalk - x = •. S.F. X 3 _ S.F. X 3 _ S.F. E. Patio / D eck ___ X • •, S.F. F. Landscape ^2.y x 6p m * 1 2-- S.F. AREAS underlain , , BY . ' ' X a , S.F. PLASTIC •• SHEETING X m , S.F.#« • X •• *r* • S.F.• ---- •------------------------ e. Other x •m S.F. • •• . __ • m - .... Total H ardcover in Zone -S.F. iM • ' ** • • , Total Property A rea in Zone m •S.F. [T • ■ 1 aI -rIT]-Z.'^ (oZ5 X TOO * % • *• III I III ii>ii Mi HARDCOVER CALCUUTIOfl WORKSHEET ^^ SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) Q-75' 75-250' (^50-500^500-1000 Existing Hardcover in Zone A. House LENGTH mmm ^ D. Sidewalk ’atio/3ec:< F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING M G. Other - X - X B. Garage - - - - - -- x c. Driveway -x WIDTH P. Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone Also T1 'Hg -II] S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. .F. ^E23l«^ -t r. I J \ W IL . S.F. • r • S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.B X 100 H.(^ % ii 1 V » * I L -vjW VT! \ - -v.-T-rxrvrj- HARDCOVER CALCULATICfl WORKSHEET ------^ SETBACK zone: ^CIRCLE one) 0-75' 75-250' (25Q-5Q0O500-I000; Existing Hardcover in Zone T A. House B. Garage D. Sidewalk E. Patio/ Deck F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING Q. Other • X a S.F. LENGTH WIDTH mm ^ S t F • « X _S.F. X a S.F. X a S.F. X a , S.F. X \n^=. <54 f.S.F. X m • •u.•1X t S • F • X s S.F. X s S t F • X s .S.F. • \X _S.F. 1 X 3 S.F. X . S.F. X S.F. X S.F. To:al Hardcover in Zone S.F Total Property Area in Zone 41S0 4150 S.F.B _4n J! •' /» wv —' •.* -r-rrr-js-* iiajjfl sum A c 1** ■.'■m Jf u*f.. ^>lTE_ PUAH 1 . ..r 1/ EAtsT ^ZVATtoh P '* ¥- ■ *:'\ r .'i-.S :’3 tl A lb p-V-,.' '1 ~__!:-•T-J-er*- CX3UTH e:Xl^Tlf^G i f '’OS 1 r itMiitfitfiii iMiilaiiiilnii ; ---------~-^L __L-wT -.i^" •V?' pfIm, :::=n=3 rr-r r:-■ :ra i4&tir e-le-vat) as - r -^' ftaR-TK.. EJ-&.VAT!<5>‘Fr ■"■i:: -f •. .:=^ • • V ' "•■ V A *«.;;•• ■ ; .; V'. rr<., -V 1» ■ i^riL AniM^il^l'lL ii It ifliltriJbli MINUTES OP A REGULAR MEETING HELD MAY 13, 1974 Ayes (3) ~ Nay« (0). Butler moved, Searlea SoIS!^fSr*th2 i building in which to atoro hay witt 2"^lSi!S!d*Sith^ that thla variance will be any change of uae from a realdential and private nature, which it ia now currently, to a commercial uae in the future. Motion, Ayea (3) - Maya (0). that the ataff la doing on the operation at the current time. The re^rt waa accepted and ordered to be put on file. Repreaentativea from the made a progeaaa report on the atorm water righta that may be involved if the drainage ia to go from one waterahed diatrict ^to another area, and to check with the City Attorney and the Engineer in regard to thia matter. Searlea moved, Butler seconded, to grant a variance to the 75* aetback require^t for lakeahore property. The har^hip in this case is the fact that the ad joking to put his house in line with other houses that are to the left and right of hia property, even though they are not 75* back. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). Butler moved, Searlea seconded, to approve the final plat for Mr. McCaffery, Lots 5,. 6. 9, 10, 6 11, Plat 42760, North Shore Cottage Acres. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). Page 3 GTAH’S landing LICENSE 3286 North Shore Drive VAniA>icn 440 Stubbs flay Road SKI TONKA 4680 Bayaide Road I.D.S. PROPOSAL Storm Water Report 6 Variance Elimination m VARIUICB MeC.ffary FINAL PLAT , 1065 Weat Ferndale Road Councilman Welsh arrived at the Council Chambera at 9il0 P.M. rvrr- J V* . • . , S r^ . ’ ' . • ^ ’•.*•'*,* *. _ . • '• * \:*v‘ ^ . .. I i •• •- . • «* •»»« -•' • 4 > , ^ r i'" • V- Village of Orono Zoning Variance Application For Ol'fioial uee Only, Warae Case No.^■r.r^' a ^ Directions to Applicant: a. Pill out tMa form in duplicate by typing or printing in ink. If the spaces provided are inauffioient, use additional sheets, keying information to the proper item number. b. c. Attach all supplementary material by paper clip & Pile duplicate applications and filing fse (S with Zoning Administrator. . fflAFP/Jt^Y , MMJie.lO£ 1. > (ftrst) ) 1 • Noie of Owner (Last)(Middle) T. Address of Owner: (No. and street) ' TCIty and Zone) (Phone) /^5"5 F&ri')dale Rag./ U/e-sf____________ Tistreet Addresso£ Property involved: : Pa I A Kerii Ja!e Esirt -t li. isaffiil Dascaripfclon ol Property InvolTed: r: 4<egal Uo Does ^hia property border on or lie partially within an adjoining munlcipalityT 6, Present tjee: V acant 'Z. I^roposod Use: Kg5/ 0£/y^^ a. Date Property Acquired: 9. Present Zoning District: 75-~Pr. SBr6AC./< 10.Variance is requested frcoi the following sections of the Zoning Ordinance: 3/J^*/ • ■ •mi 0 •■>• ‘ >'»—,•■ ' • '■ ■.•■ ' ; .-,. • - - ■ • ‘ « . , . *. , .• ^ •. *}. • * .' - ............. '• .. •. *• ^ C-N .A ITT wk«t aro th» r«qulran«nt5 ai th» ordiwc. aacticna Item 107 Proi<\ i-A)CE ^Has an application tor zoning v^ianca ^j^5e"“^Tpr^eW j:?: ^:^iVsT.tun. —Th« law reauirea that the conditions set forth 1J j fouSwiSS itame 1l^, 15, and 16 ^ be jatabliahed before a variance can be granted. Explain in d * ^-uip^ents each atatament wherein your case conforaa to the requiranents kardsnip to Owner. Strict application a the provisions of the Zoning ordinance Mcullar and practical difficxiltiea or exceptional or undue hardship uprr the owner of the lot in such lot in 1 manner customary and lag^ly within the zoning district in vdiioh said lot ia located. Granting of f.be variance is recessary for the and enjo’ntcnt of a substantial property rigl\t xent and"* to alleviate demonstrablec.nd will not merely aerve as a convenience to the spplicant. Explain in detail. I. Tl>«- rt- Y Aeirtohsii^if ho^fse-. , ahe, a b^S"^' // • a*. , 4 f awFi 'v’ 1 ’**■—**• V‘ t«* • \k 1g. gxeepfclonai (jondltlona of tne Lot; There are apecial condi tions (narrowness, shallowness or shape of a lot, exceptional topographic or water conditione or other extraordinary and exceptional conditions of such lot) applying to the structures or land in question that are peculiar to the property involved or iassediabely adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or struct\xrea in the district in which said land is located. Explain in detail. I- ■■ i i Effect on Neighborhood and Comprehensive Plan; Qr<uiting the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, unreasoiuibly increase the oongeatl6n. in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair established property values in the surroxindlng area, or in any other way impair health, .safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and any applicable comprehensive plan. Explain in detail. K' >^Vv Ik '. ' ':<:3 • • :<V'-' ' ■■■ *^30 ' '''V ’V't •» ■ *■ -T?•. 7 ^ •.*• -r' UoffiT Bie foilowing material aiust bo attachad to this application. 17.A map or plat ahowing the property affected and all lands within 150 feet of the bovmdarles of the property affected by proposed change. ( copies) 18.An abstractors certified property certificate listing the names and addresses of the owners of the land within I50 feet of the boxmdaries of the affected property as those names appear on the records of the County Auditor of Hennepin County. Acknowledgement and SlgnatureT Oie undersigned hereby repre sents upon all of the penalties of law, for the purpose of inducing the Village of Orono to take the action herein requested, that all statements heroin are true and that all work heroin mentioned will be done in accordance with the ordinances of the Village of Orono and the laws of the State of Hlnnesote. gnatnire For official Comments Only: i r'« r. , *. •TO; 1'FROM: k • •^. • 1 DATED; u SUBJECT: PETITIONER; FI LOCATION: ^ i STAFF REPORT; JFm Cosbv, Cl+y Admlrfstrator Dexter Marston, Zoning Administrator May 10, 1974 Variance - From the 75- Setback Req'jirement Maurice McCaffrey !053 Ferndale Read West a permit to fill In the basement of a house that was raised. At that time, the City of Orono or the Minnehaha Watershed District had a 75' setback requirement. When the Watershed District adopted Its 75* setback from the Iske, I Informed Mr, McCaffrey that ho would have to get a variance from the Watershed District. Fnclosed you will find a letter from the Watershed District conflrit j the fact That Mr. McCaffrey was grante"* a variance for the location of his home. Since this time, the City of Orono has adopted Its own 75* setback requlre- menr, and Mr. McCaffrey was not Informed of that until just recently. Nonreliy, a petifloner who requests a variance Is referred to the Planning Commission, but Mr. McCaffrey has asked If the Council wi'l act on this rotter wither the Planning Commission's recommendation since he has already received the aoproval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and has made plans to start construction of a home the week of May 20, 1974. !n addition, Mr. McCeffrey needs a variance from the moratorium. Since Mr. McCaffrey Is planning fo construct a sealed system, there should be no problem with granting this variance. rr* ’.‘--.J MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT P.O. Box 3B7, WojrxatJ, Mlmioxol* 55391 -11 • M. tWf i. Ct^f^n • DffM H. •lio^wco C. MMf# im ■ni«TOBffi January 18, 1974 Mr. M. McCaffrey 1475 Shoreline Drive Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Re: Permit Application 74-2 Setback Variance - Femdale Estates - Orono Dear Mr. McCaffrey: I'his will advise you that the Minnehaha CrccV ;:arersh'‘d District Board of Managers, meeting Jan’«;’r>* .17, i974, has approved the subject request for a £CtLav^ variance. The variance will allow a 40-foot setbacr. for residence to be built on parts of Lot 9 and Lot 10, Nc-t’’ r i ors Cottage Acres on Brovrn^s Bay of Lake Minnetor^.a xn ^he City of Orono. Sincerely, >INNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT E.A. Hickok, P.E. Engineer for the District BAH/dv cc:Larry Kelley D. Marsten V -V 1 f ". , t. • Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Pron: Date: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning S Zoning Administrator January 16, 1991 Subject: #1611 Bruce & Camille Curtiao, 1920 Fagerness Point Road - After-the-Fact Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IC, Single family lakeshore residential, 1/2 acre Application - After-the-fact request for variance to replace deck in 0-75' setback zone List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Hardcover Calculations Planview Sketch of Deck, by Applicant Memo from Building Inspector 1/8/91 & Photographs 1990 Correspondence, Staff/Applicant/Applicant's Attorney Assessor's Records Original House Plans Documentation from Variance Application #643 Pertinent Facts - 1.In late summer 1990, applicants proceeded to totally replace the existing deck on the lakeside of the house, without obtaining permits. The City was notified of the work by an anonymous phone caller, and a stop work order was immediately posted. The newly constructed deck is in approximately the same configuration and location as the previous deck. The most reliable documentation we have of the previous deck is in the assessor's records. Although for aesthetic purposes the deck corners have been angled, it is staff's opinion that the new deck has not increased hardcover on the property beyond that which previously existed. 3.A variance was granted in 1981 that allowed 3,222 s.f. (15.1%) hardcover in the 0-75' zone. As indicated on the survey, most of the property and all of the existing house and deck are in the 0-75' ?one. Per the hardcover calculations by applicants' surveyor, existing 0-75' hardcover currently is 3233 s.f., within 11 s.f. of the amount previously approved for this property. 1 4 m Zoning Pile #1611 January 16, 1991 Page 2 Discussion Please review the Building Inspector's memo of January 8, 1991. The Building Inspector's observations and the accompanying photographs suggest that the applicant was attempting to avoid having to obtain a permit or City approval for the deck replacement. The applicant has paid the after-the-fact variance fee, and, if the application is approved, would be required to obtain an after-the-fact building permit. Staff's site inspection on January 16, 1991 verified that the hardcover calculations by Gronberg appear to be correct, and the overall dimensions of the deck are nearly identical to the old deck dimensions on record. Staff Recommendation Given that replacement of the pre-existing deck has resulted in no Increase in hardcover on the property, after-the-fact approval might be justified by no increase in hardcover, no changes in the existing encroachment in the 0-75' zone, and creation of a safer deck. If necessary, there are a few very limited areas of rock and plastic in the 0-75' zone that could be removed to result in a decrease in hardcover. A requirement that the applicant obtain an after-the-fact building permit would be appropriate if approval is recommended. Isv fc'.'.i I i. my .jH ■ - - ^ f' CITY OP OROHO - VARIANCE APPLICATION r:J Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) 3 . r 7 TV* “C UJk I f Cl UM vitu “ fXrr’Trr f ^M/7ITUU Cl I iWk Xww'«/a^ c wvrv ,-f -ry Tc-,-r :a VX -*U1? -w*V'»VV PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address r '.rrr70T_r-j>ii;*. vri») 1 tVXJ I I . V. nii.r? ! Tf “-AmJ L: >:-ruQxr L^v.jz^ i aa.«v 12/06/y Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) /7- //T- ,^3 - Z5'Od>3( Attach legal description to application if not included on DEC required survey. 6 £9 Phone (home ) ^7/ - Phone (worJc)________ Address : /f^o ^/f<i£<,u£S5 £.?. City: iJ^yZ^^rA APPLICANT Name Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)_ _ Name 1^/Cu.cC <t (lA/ni l,uB Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: /. Date Property Acquired n /(T (month/year) V .'i (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District .•? . /s 'X. Present Ose of Property fiss/Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF RBQONST Estimated Construction Cost $ 7oo^~ Describe request in detail: isAAi ft //hA/A)r£^AA/c^ cff DgCiC VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side X Rear) ' Other Ilf ITtffir HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical enforcement of zoning regulations: ict DESCRIPTION OF DHDSDAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: ^^7" g/gg ts a/or- r» -- < REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1.-^ Completed Application Form 2.1^' Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3.1/' Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4..^ Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8J5"xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 0%''xll"). Slcetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%**xll"). As an addendum to this application/ please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. Tha Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above infomation has not been included. APPLICANT * S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the bent of his/her Icnowledge. Applicant's Signature Date ONNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agre<».s to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning C«—ission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please maJce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 6 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 4 r ,<r^fi^jS> • ••.:.s ^ ^5^ w •,••••< V*. I A,,« ,••••• m ^ •* “....* • •• •• ••••• ^•••^ a m. yt • .• [K* 'f- fe :1:'V kX I .4? #1611 I GOVT LOT 3 M^I itiWiYi 1*^11 nI I Jnrow^ ;VK ;,.j . -a . ^ ^ RUN 'OATB 0V2S/W . ; > •' * / I ■ r- ' ! .J, eAtcAoo* i,i :j ? i V.;.- n :■ *^4 .' -i}*- ’* •* AI»A1 . HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST • ' t •*' ' ’ ’ ■ ^ ■ I j r ■ ■’ REPORT NO. P14I5R01 i 4 • Lf i .PACE 25 • f • 1’-1 ^ i)•• I (» *■ 5« f7-117>25 2S 0001 : 00056 ^ORESS UNASSISNED }!' OHNER NAME " S.ATE LAND DEPT . j h TAXPAYER . , STATE LAND OEPT t j TV* kiASROAfinn < kiriT rno e4icyuATCft ro vlVi'PROPADOR «>•. J 58 '17-117-25 25 0006 , ; i .3 > NAfC/AODR ;• NOT fOR SALE/MATER FRONT :<!•5 il 38 17-117-25 25 OOOS 00056 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO JAMES A HELEN KREMER JAMES A HELEN KRAMER 1657 FA6ERNESS PT RD NAYZATA HN S5591 58 17-117-25 25 0008 ^ 01905 EAGERNESS POINT RO MILLIAM A HIBBS HILLIAH A HIBBS i ■ MOUND m ^11: ^ PRO pU d OR V 01913 EAGERNESS POINT RO OMCR NAME ;• OAVIO L SUVIK A MIEE J*-.’;| T.\ taxpayer r> Vv »ume /aodr ; DAVID L SUVIK 191S FAGERNESS PT RD NAYZATA HN 55391 .* iUm m '‘i’ • ’lln’ ' ; 58 17-117-25 25 0015 -• * » 'I. :t 38 17-117-23 23 0010 01927 FAGERNESS POINT RD ; D L PETERSON « E H PETERSON DARRYL L PETERSON 1921 FAGERT4ESS POINT RD S NAYZATA HN 55391 1589 EINCH LA . • i 55554! f ». .. ‘i ’ ' f \ i . 17-117-23 23 0011^ I FAGERNESS POINT RO 38 .01929 LLOYD DRAPER , . LLOYD H DRAPER 6015 GIRARD AVE SO MPLS HN 55419 •! . <k ..f ». I • \ i‘ V'l! .f;'.- PROP'AOOR C?*' OHNER.NAHE > • TAXPAYER 01952 EAGERNESS POINT RO HARK R PLATT . . MARK R PLATT ' ■i ' 58 17-117-25 23 0Ol6 01926 EAGERNESS POINT RD -K ll DAH^l IP . ■ ‘1 > 38 17-117-2i 23 0020* r SWAUIr7ffr^v55119 \ V ONNER NAME ( L 8 H KARPINENL • n MKTxncn -« «, . TAXPAYER • LAUR; H KARPINEN i>: '! ’ ! I NAME/AOOR' :i849 FAGERNESS POINT RO S 7 /f-ac Ui JCW/ 38 17-117-23 23 0051 01920 FAGERNESS POINT RO BRUCE A CAMILLE CURTISS 8RUCE A CAMILLE CURTISS '^1920 FAGERNESS POINT RD NAYZATA m 55391 01837 FAGERNESS POINT RD J A H KRAMER ; < JAMES L KRAMER ■ 1857 FAGERNESS PT RO : HAYZATA MN 65591 ••'ll i 2- • * i • f TOTAL BATCH i M I • •' 4 ' ifi j • • i ■ 009 00011 ■/; 1 / 4 H ! I' r- »* t •»>_ CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCU^TE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROpCRTY TAXATION, TO TH: BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. , . / ) i'ifei I , 0%^ LI ,I ■ti :i I •. I !| u • I 7 » » f / .. i ■! f'. ''•;? [=< 7 ' :» V ■i tlf;- ^ 'fi ’ ii i•. >.?i "5i !ii.’ i • > * • 8 , iri ■ %% ■ ; 4 I I • ( ^ ; 1. \ K I ^ •J . • /# I . f ?• « .1:,^ , •# • i f t * *. < f 4 • f • 1 ^ i * • J f'.!- \ • . :i. < ' •V I '• ’ 'l,'^ t ♦ i • • I *; i1 * • . f ’ • •u ■!.' j .M ■ • ^ •' •. if f ’* • * ) V j' ■ i1 • I: I 1 * • . . 'V.. ■'; 1 i ‘ n 4 ■• ; f iV.. J • • •• i 4, i i.'ffii;:r- ‘ ‘ f *: *• •. 1 I ; ■ I1:''V '•ii' i'‘ I...: M ■' 1 »: i \ T I ' : 4 ^ V jI : "J 4 \ I ! ’ ■a *•' . I * J i:? < ; A ' I \ !s »' • I I ; .JV ■ :•{; . ; j r i-' :|’- .'i . #. •• • 1* ■ , i.1 ii.J I J ! H :17 4 i * .V 1 'f-a! m; h i S - * !m‘ o 1*,: ;• i:' * I •I 14 / iiili oi'l » S A r • % ig. •*. W-V. //-/?'90 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE'ONE) (0-75*3 75-250' Existing Hardcover in Zone 250-500' 500-1000' A. ■ House ' LENGTH Z. I B. Garage c. D riveway 19€CK ^ouc. pviTio D.. StSEVfALK • C^.O <:oyc. Aig,PAca • z.a UO**^*. UAI? ->TO VJ e E, Patio / )eck :pATi'» P»WC - 2.0 - 2.6 - 'h.O • • CteAu.) tyurS't^f jc o^r K F. Landscape ^>o areas underlain BY , PLASTIC J SHEETING G. Other WIDTH • • • • '4.0 X . X _ X 2.8 'h,o 4.5 4-'=* \*0.0 /<r.5 X X X Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone = / S.F. = / 2. s,F, /2.6^ 7.30 Soo = 7.g c.o = 't.t. I*;, o • ••• = . 118.5 • . • 33 ^5 IZI3 2/ 3SO S.F.A*'-.- r..i S.F. S.F.CD S.F. S.F. •• S.F. % = S.F.' S.F. S.F. S.F. I - I- •• • . • . V :r- ^ r. “ : S.F. ‘ . C ■•. - . z ''. .z -s >? >• S.F. S.F. S.F. r ^7 :: cA*;; ^ ^ N •r S. ^ P • L' CO C2 J S.F.2? *» -— o 4^ u ..r* c S.F. S.F. 3 2/1'3 .-rP^ X 100 -% W r^ -nure. ylioh. 2 ' A£»l. TO .»«•.• M. .* *• •• M#. M *«W« * • . t r ; •: wt'^r 0 • }> .-.■■■Km ci^acTi^ ” . . » • * m‘ HARDCOVER CALCULATIOtl WORKS^ET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE' one) 0-75' ^75-250'") 250-o00 Existing Hardcover in Zone 500-1000' A. ■ House 3. Garage COhXC.c. Driveway E. Patio/ 3ec:< G. Other LENGTH D.. Sidewalk ^ F. Landscape ^ AREAS UNDERLAIN BY ■ , _ _ _ _ _ PLASTIC SHEETING WIDTH „ X 17,5 X X X S Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F. LIS 9 /95o X 100 - ^ tH =f m • • »ft S.F.\ii 5*2 5“__ S.F.tHm•« • • S.F.i • • •• __ S.F, ^ 1 m t • • .1 c cM • r • • • ft •• __ S.F. •i1 • • • • ••«__ S.F. • __ S.F.• . 1 • *• __ S.F. 1 i 1 *» « •• • • __ S.F. • • • • __ S.F. • ’ S _ S.F. • i • m _ S.F.Jl • /95 0 m II1 . S • F • 1 •• •• • • • .irtrifcgfV rI" k i:' • M <0^- To: From: Date: Subject: 9/11/90 1891.1 1920 Fagerness Point Road - Bruce & Camille Curtiss Lyle Oman, Building Official January 8, 1991 Deck Construction Without Permit ^ 9/11/90 J' V- ' i 9/12/90 9/20/90 9/27/90 9/28/90 11/28/90 i ■ ' t -t.. ; V 5 d ■ ■ Received anonymous phone call stating a deck was being built at 1920 Fagerness Point Road and materials are stored, painted and cut in the garage. Inspectors Lyle Oman ani Bruce Vang visit the property. From the street it looked like an old existing deck, but when we walked to the back yard, it became clear that this was a new deck. The old guardrail was propped on top of the new deck and an old joist was clamped on below that for no apparent structural reason. An old post was also used. This end of the deck is all you can see from the street. This gave the strong impression that the owner was trying to hide the new construction (see photos). A Stop Work Order was posted stating no work until a permit was issued. Visited site to take more photos, clamped on joist had been removed. Guardrail and Letter to owner requiring permit application by October 1, 1990. The City received a letter from the owners' attorney requesting more time. Letter to attorney granting extension until Planning Commission deadline of October 26, 1990. 11/27/90 Letter sent to owner stating application has not been received. New deadline of December 7, 1990. The City receives letter from owners' attorney dated November 26, 1990 stating a surveyor had been out and they were awaiting the results. 12/6/90 Received application. .j:.-..... 1920 Eagerness Point Road January 8, 1991 Page 2 of 2 - Bruce & Camille Curtiss Previous History on LaJceshore SetbacJcs 9/14/81 Mr. Curtiss was granted hardcover# lakeshore and street setback variances to construct a garage. 10/24/84 Mr. Curtiss was ordered to remove fill he had recently placed within 75' of the lake and within 26' of a designated wetland. 1/11/88 L Mr. Curtiss was granted an after-the-fact variance for a fence within 75' of the lake and within 26' of the designated wetland. fc * m a-!?.*..wi . 7 mm ;i. i; ‘ .■ I ■i • ^ ^ r • •• *,•»»! t I ' . . > Cf^ •Yi3 r LmI SSs* IM -#w. jiXt^ h,|U“''M; ilM i ♦ '• -I Pf’^ - I : \J-f - '-iVy•Jv:' f i{|l?5 i /‘ V . »• '** *'*• ,r# ii m i ■i. >tliSa! A' VDcc-Vi*'oaKs'i! V t ^ iMi-L«..J[ jiil^ li 1 ■. • , »»*♦ H 4 ( IY CITY II IR-ORa^K:^ #1e loho 1 ITY N rm'\ Post Office Box 66»Cry8tal Bay, Minneeota 55323• Munidpai Officea On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka Doceitiber 6, 1990 Bruce and Camille Curtiss 1920 Fagerness Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 RE; Variance Application Dear Mr. and Mrs. Curtiss; The City is in receipt of your Variance Application. A Zoning Pile Number has been assigned to your application. Please make arrangements to stop in at the City offices to pick up a sxgn with this number on it. The sign must be posted on your property by Wednesday, January 16, 1990. If you have any further questions, offices at 473-7357. please contact the City Sincerely, Linda Vee Secretary BUILDING k ZONING - 473-73S7 ASSESSING ADMINISTRATION k FINA.NCE - 473-7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 I. II 'J A I \\1t . CITY , I i1 QRONO I CITY of ORONO Po«t Office Box 66«Cry«tal Bay, MinneeoU 55323•Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka November 27, 1990 Bru ce_and_Cami1le Curtiss ; 1920-Pa‘gerTiess"nPoint‘' Road " Wayzata, MN 55391 RE: Deck Construction Without 7?ermit Dear Mr. Curtiss: On September 11, 1990 a stop v;ork order was posted on a deck under construction on your property. On September 27, 1990 your attorney asked for more time to submit a variance application. A deadline of October 26, 1990 was vjiven. As of this date, an application has not been received. This letter is to notify you that if an application with the required submittals is not received by December 7, 1990, citations will be issued and the matter referred to the City Attorney for further legal action. If you have any questions, feel free to contact anyone in the Building and Zoning Department. Sincerely Lyle Oman Senior Building Inspector Enclosure: Variance Application cc:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Bruce Vang, Field Inspector LO/lsv BUILDING a ZONING - 473-7357 ASSESSING administration a France - 473-7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 i ^1/ Gordon G. (Jeff) Mohr attorney at law SOUTHGATE OFFICE PLAZA SOOl WEST 80lb STREET. SUITE 1020 BLOOMINGTON. MINNESOTA 35437 (612) I3I-OM4 r~-' Cn ! r • :r jin - --r j's 0^‘^^Tsii 2 8 im November 26, 1990 Mr. Lyle Oman Senior Building Inspector City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Bruce and Camille Curtiss 1920 Eagerness Point Road Dear Mr. Oman: As an update regarding the Curtiss variance application, a surveyor was located and retained on 10-2-90. The surveyor appeared on site 10- 17-90. Hearino nothing from the surveyor by 11-6-90, we called to find out when their work would be ready and we were told by 11- 13-90. On 11-13-90 we were told that the week of 11-19-90 was more accurate. We are still awaiting the survey, it is expected any day. At that point the application will be ready. Sincerely, Gordon G. (Jeff) Mohr Attorney at Law GGM:jah it mm 'a ■» ■■ 'Mi ■ •ii i, ~ aifi** %' ‘i S fra f i ■■ 4 i i ■ ■ mmi. i-.CITY" CITYof ORONO Post Office Box 66‘Crystel Bay. MinnasoU 55323•Municipal Offices OF QRONQ On tJie North Shore of Lake Minnetonka September 28r 1990 Gordon G. (Jeff) Mohr Southgate Office Plaza '5001 West 80th St.r suite 1020 Bloomingtonr MN 55437 REi Bruce and Camille Curtiss - 1920 Fagerness Point Road Deck Construction without Permit Dear Mr Mohrs I am in receipt of ^ submittll^of an October 26 1990^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the deadline for th« November 19, 1-^0 PIa^^^ meeting. Because of the ° ci-v will not hesitate to previous history on this complaint if thisissue citations and proceed with a tormai compa.a deadline is not met. __ T^ia»ae*» feel free to contact me at myIf you have any questionsr please leei tree office. Sincerely tLyle -Oman Senior Building Inspector cc: lTaiJA%“curtrs%'ri920 Fa,.mess Point Rd., W.y«ta, MNp 55391 SUIUMNC a zoning - 473-7357 ASSESSING AOMINISnunON A nNANCE-«>735» FAX-47M510 PUBUC WORKS - 473-T359 Gordon G. (Jeff) Mohr ATTORNEY AT LAW Ili SOUTHGATE OPHCE PLAZA SOOl WEST «Xll STREET. SUITE 1020 BLOOMINGTON. MINNESOTA 35437 (612) S3I-09M nlf fli crr>jsnvTjj SEP 2 7 September 26, 1990 Mr. Lyle Oman Senior Building Inspector City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, M.N 55323 Re: Bruce and Camille Curtiss 1920 Eagerness Point Road Dear Mr. Oman: Please be advised that I have been asked to advise Mr. Curtiss. I have undertaken a review of this matter including a review of the Orono City Code. I'm sure you can appreciate that my efforts will require some time. I have today directed Mr. Curtiss to complete the variance application together with whatever information or forms are required. I doubt that I have given Mr. Curtiss sufficient time to do a proper job on the variance, so please do not hold it against him if he doesn't have it in by October 1st, he'll have it in as soon as possible. We appreciate your understanding. Sincerely, Gordon 6. (Jeff) Mohr Attorney at Law GGM:jah k cc: Bruce and Camille Curtiss . y .ci J y-' ■-Im.r y***,r> '*' ’ '*'i"' '> ~ H- ■^.ji.iii .wiwmrnmmm \ aTY QF ORONO“d CITY of ORONO Post OiUce Box 66*Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323•Municipal Officaa On the N-' ' • ^ ’ ore of Lake Minnetonka September 24, 1990 Jeff Mohr 5001 West 80th Suite 1020 Bloomington, MN 55437 Re; Deck built without permit at 1920 Fagerness Point Road Dear Mr. Mohr: Enclosed is a letter written to Mr. Curtiss in 1984 quoting the Orono ordinance which restricts construction within 75' of the lake. Also enclosed is a copy of the Stop Work Order from 1986 which resulted in a Council resolution requiring fence to be shortened to 3%'. BV/tln Enclosures , . . cc; Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Lyle Oman, Senior Building Inspector BUILDING A ZONING - 413-73S7 ASSESSING ADMINISTRATION A HNANCE - 473-735S FAX-47X1510 PUBUC WORKS - 47J-73S9 i--- i 4 CITY of ORONO Cl "nr OF orono M Post Office Box 66»Cry8ui Bay, Minnesota 55323•Municipal OfBcaa On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka Seotember 20t 1990 Bruce Curtiss 1920 Fagerness Point Road Wayzatar MN 55391 , Re: Deck Construction without Permit Dear Mr. Curtiss: on Seotember 11, 1990 a Stoo Work Order was issued on a deck replace^eSr^ro%ct on your property at 1920 ^-^erness Point Road. This deck replacement is in volation of setback hardcover code requirements. This letter is to notify you that the deck itust be removed or a v«faiorappi!cation with the required submittals must be received by the City before October Ir 199 —• If this deadline is not met, the City will issue citations and refer the matter to the City Attorney for further legal action. Sincerely, Lyle Oman, Senior Building Inspector LO/tln , . a..Enclosure - Variance Application 4 cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building S Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning s Zoning Administrator Bruce Vang, Building Inspector Bryem Crawford, City Attorney buiuding a zu .iNC - 473-7357 ASSESSING administration & RNANCE - 473-T355 FAX-4734J510 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 CITY OF ORONO INSPECTION NOTICE PERMIT NO. ADDRESS OWNER CALLED IN SCHEDULED COMPLETED ^ I ^ fSs£> Po/niT PhAO TELEPHONE NO. :a DESCRIPTION 01 FOOTING 02 FRAMING 03 INSULATION 04 WALL BO. 05 FINAL 07 DEMO-SITE 07 DEMO-FINAL 09 PLUMBING Rl 10 PLUMBING FINAL 11 MECHANICAL Rl 16 WELL TEST PUMP 11 MECHANICAL FINAL 18 EXCAV/GRAOING/FIUJNG 24/25 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 19 LAKESHOREAVETLANDS 34 TREE REMOVAL12 WATER HOOK-UP 13 METER SET/TURN ON 14 SEWER HOOK-UP 27 SEPTIC MAINT. 15 SEPTIC INSTALL 17 SITE INSPECTION 06 PROGRESS 21 COMPLAINT 22 FOLLOW-UP •VU. Ir.^ -rT/ r- v-’t: -fc.. • -.4-, —T Zl- •-----II.I i.Vina ^VifVif-tiiTrrT*'-~lTn“ii'?n»T?fft^rrff«- 23 SEPTIC FINAL OWNEWCONTWACTOR TO MEET YOU:__YES___NO COMMENTS: -fer ^TX:>? vnao Qo-s'TsrO P ca-wmX ggYu>rurO 4-g><^ - •1 - T>- , -• 1^0 uc>eg-\c or^^TcL- ^QyVvvuJ^ ; □ WORKSATlSFACTORYt PROCEED ' a CORRECT WORK & PROCEED 1 □ CORRECT WORK, CAU FOR REiNSPECTION [ BEFORE COVERINQ □ CORRECT UHBAFECONOniON WITHIN___ IHSPfiCrOR WILL RETURN ^^^TOP ORDER POSTED. CAa INSPECTOR ~i lueoe HOURS. C PROJECT COMPLETE O ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY ________TEMPORARY ________PERMANENT *.... ». ...... •• • ..» - V -C ••'• * ...................... I • • • ,*- 1 • • . • • ** m •: — ;r\- f^l4.*x»*'« V.?**•»■ .i.'j v.l ,«• >T.' r.:' Uv ’*^ - *• f* ^ '* -**•' *T,"* C PHOTO TAKEN C CITATION ISSUED □ INSPECTION REQUIRED. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next bispection 24 hours in advance. 473*7357 OwmerfContractor on site:------------------------------------------------------,^lEL _________________ •- .rr- . Inspector _^ Whto CopyAttpA^OiS Pit*Canary Copy/Sita Nolioa .... — ^ ----------------_-^.*k4...- . / . : .'»-v - i- * P»- W y -““r-‘ , •••»: T* , •" ■ • » ..• •• 7 * *-. . ' .4. * *. •■*-. » ‘ .4 .'.HI ^ -.4 --r— - » • •'. f..** 4^^* • •• * ' ,-~f • —---- 4 ••, s* ..4 ». r ~ . »« A « . . • .4 •• N»-.. ‘ .: . ' • . 4 • • 4« • ♦ ilEM,J It I omwHuom - basic housc X X X X X X san iOS^ m ___________¥ OSfil total QAAAOi TO aaia Ct *y c PLAT ^ - PARCEL 5ttc /TWP_^Z-^ R^lO f. X5 •;9^^^eS TYpf t 1» 1» 1 1» T S/L S/f CLA«S 1 3 • • T ACE •• A,7//■< • ' , inspection date > >tzfC‘ APPRAISAL DATE >■» S»- 7 ^ SALE OATS PARTIAL _ TYPE_____ IMPROVEMENTS HATE .4/ value IBZAU ^/X Vv.-- ' - f t . . •’ /L^a P- • V « 2/2^ K ■ 7' ' X V Ac:c> X • - - tXTfUS Crm^yiQ c qriupwav 1 234SS7 1234S67 •SMT. FINISH t 234547 1 234547 _________________tC, plumbing 1 234547 t 234547 1 234547 t 234547 riMCPLACI 1 234547 w/o msur.1234547 BUILT INS 1234547 VAULTCOCEIL.1 234547 miu 1234547 CCNTAAL AiR 1 234547 mm ... »ATin nnoNA f 234547 PENCE.;1234547 1 234147 1234547 60D ••• _*» • • ‘tP ' , •*,. ♦ •»* i'r: • .r* TOC? /S’®«3 ' f . ■': •/.. ^ CL •I > . • V. * I i I •« » . . • M * . • .V •! < , • / * ♦ . i • i • i'* •>• » • • • • • » ■ *. ' .• • . • . * V. f •. •% .'-f* •UlfSpcj ^ . i^-irv^ -K “'4 V*Mil 1| « 4. - ^ V \ ■ r % « > • VV” ' Vx ;*'■••• . .*•..V i* '1 v'»- • 'A* •/ '•• 'V •'***■ • • %• .-i'.' '•• '•. •?V' / ;* *, • - r- ■ •• • : k 4* V * ; - • i*/.'-:' •'■; . * '’V.-H ’ •' i- ' ' ■ • ^ ; • • •• • \'iki • • *•' ^ ’ •' , * • '* * * ^ • * * • J “ • ’ * •' ' • f- V-r vjt//" i *. ^ .r............. Z> '^Ra €.‘ • * •«‘ /> • • • • ^ ric tK^ %rr« V'« UHg \ Jxm'Mir fnx »1 wfi’^j' ^«*«V*i r* V'*?^' ♦?? -*< -r'^'^r , ; v^ »»•—'-▼ — » ^ ^ ■■ ■ ■ t ■ ■" »• W-JtK w'xrV'V -V •# IA-; • ts^ ftrr.-ar>u ^u.-at^tgiy-xiytf«-s^ ^-gjzrte:xg<to *TfvTf- »- .'/4 i^-• .fif? ^gwft^jg^BBMhaa E- '■ W;- ^yf' * ;. *i * .*'. '-M .4* . » •. . ; O*^' •'i’ ■• .V. . ^ . .'•• • • • •• - . 1 4- j % *if >•• •• i •'. ’ •'# A «• • v> ^ , •••*-> ii/ I’i’'^^*- (Vt'' rv. f - • •*• •*, W % \ ^ «wJ!TV.^^. A-:&5»mmm M?A-m * h ‘^il{ '■ * ■ ■ • .1 % ••' 2 t> iKi.Ana c \ \ . V -•* . • -• i '■• •■ •IP .*••'•r i afS^u »%. :i i S ■-iSte ’ * HV luKLk L^:' .• 5?"’'\^*;-.‘a 1 *i . — U •• . . ** t • >:••:. t r . f ' i.‘. * ‘ • • » • ' 1 ,.. ■ • :• . ;•.•* • ;; » • . V \tJ M A' I j ; I •« «»•* 4 -• . ■■ ^ .* III M mM itan ' 1*. s .• • i • • ‘ • ^ zijfziS • • .« •■ 4"ft;?. -4.V?; 't-2 f ', ^'/ ,• i ^> - •r }. s'* : ^ IV ^ ^ .' *M%. V t •* .0^ **> ^ .*' ^ 1 ^ * •' ■ ■ . L J. .« f ___.1.^^ 1.__ U» ^ t ^ * . 1 ^ • - • r • ^ ^ , . I . •T-e<* :-rr* -X. .vr*'>V>-^ •' >. t* ■ «t m* ^ -v vi : r,,< t. •. ' - f. • ♦ r • iw.r-^ fe: 1;Kft ;”v ^ T’ dMi»«T;- V>**» 'vf . I ' X '■ * . t ■••»• •'■ •■ ‘ ■ ' >*ii . ''/. H-.'- ‘ • ♦ / ? • r "I *1^ f7<"' . I 4 I • • 0 • «t • . I * i • • .• r • A \f t • . ■• ■ - '.V %'• t.y. " '. vr>;. 'r. •. ■\' {.» • • ■*,<* # J «» • <t. i dt 1L,ft ft lU ■3 1 I r ^ I/I ‘ • V f ", 0 • u mmjmfm 1 Oi ‘it^tlifli.* Mi*% !•♦•% Mimim %.•!.• •«i.’»• Munii iimM MNi•*• Trlr|»hi»n«* !••* »• TO: Bruco k Catnillc Curtiss 1920 Fagerness Point Road Wayzata* HN 55391 -------------- lA'U C ro I No. SOi mmmm Meeting Hate 9-14-81 Notice Date 9-15-81 X Variance Conditional UBe Permit Subdivision, Preliminary Subdivision, Final Copies to: - — " r^tOMOMtHM*******************,********************************”********"**** COCNCIL ACTION Vote: .j!_ for _Against _ Abatantlon . MCTIPN approve the hardcover^ lakcshore setback and 10* street aetbaclc ^ attached oarafla haasAM^ tbs fnlinmtng ■■ findWst-1) raduction':*of approximately 1700 sf of hardcover; 2) proposed - .» ,> « m • •• iiwprovaffanta Iccatcd furtl^er froni laltcsj^re: 3) the garage located with—ilQQC facing "out ■'to^s treat 'wii 1 a llow the complete removal of existing gravel arear 4) Fagerness Point Road is a dead end road receiving limited use. Approval i ss^biect CO the followinc conditions:maround nn »he. nmnertiL • •• . •“Vx; and the’ restoration of that area bv seeding or soddino? 3) In additioiiA- fniinffll has gaked staff to work with veu eonrernina a rnnvani^uTMaitsl date nf thi ^ > • if »»« provKW). for Work Permit _ _ for work to begin - for work to be appllestion listed WORK PERMITS ARE REQUIRED - contact Building Inspector before beginning X r :VAR1A1ICE APPROVAL is limited to the extent shown on *PP*^*^ •, ”".'>Do not ehonge plans, variance authority expires ®"« W' if^^»***** . * . 1 OOMDinONAL USE APPROVAL expires upon change of ownerinlp or use* M dr on deadline date specified above, . .rLi-marinnSS2: ai - ^ m A*. a.. a._ _ t *.,• .» . rerecording returned to the City by deadline date,_______*crrrrr:i ’T;3------------ &r11fra“7Sp‘l*e7*f UUrCi ty Council * i.f»n-s^rfne the Clfv Clerk Mlnw 8t least three weeks from meeting o e*f •e • 4' • ^ * .• • • Walter R. Benson Jeamne A. Mabusth DATE: September 9, 1981 SUBJECT: #643 Bruce Curtiss/ 1920 Eagerness Point Road - Variance Zoning District - LR-IC Area ~ 21»780+ sfAtplication - Variances for new garage + new driveway and removal of existing garage and paved , V area a) Hardcover Variance 0-75' allowed ■ 0 sf existing « 3,955 sf^ proposed = 2,214 3^52.3.^^ or variance r'r n inj^^rdco’ e Setback required = 75' existing = 5' proposed =* 25' variance ® 75' c) Front (street) setback required = 30’ existing » 19’ proposed = 20' variance = 10' or 33.3% Planning Commission Action -to approve the hardcover + setback variance but to deny street setback variance - turnaround had to be provided on property. vf "liist of Exhibits W Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Application Property Owner's List Survey Plat Map Hardcover Plans Building Elevations Curtiss' Letter I|. , ^ To:Mayor Peterson fit Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject January 14, 1991 #1613 Jensen Homes, Inc., 315 Tonkawa Road Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance- Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 - Conditional use required for non-rental apartment (refer to R-IA, Section 10.20, G2 - Non rental guest apartments). List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit P Exhibit G Exhibit H Application Property Owners List Plat Map Applicant's Addendum Lower Level Floor Plan First Floor Plan Second Floor Plan Sewage Treatment "Spec" Sheet Review of Current Application - The applicants propose the installation of a non-rental apartment within the lower level of the Bennett residence. As Mr. Bennett advises, the apartment is proposed for the exclusive use of domestic help to assist in the care of his children. Please review Exhibit D. A single access to the apartment is shown and functions as the primary and only entrance. The existing residence was constructed at a four bedroom use level. Review Exhibits E, F and G. The applicants propose two additional bedrooms on the second floor over the garage and with the additional bedroom in the lower level for the non-rental guest apartment, the house will contain a total of seven bedrooms. The original mound system design for this structure was at a six bedroom use level (Exhibit H). The applicants builder, Jensen Homes, has been advised of the septic deficiency. Staff met with Jim Jensen to discuss the potential for expansion of the existing 6 bedroom mound. In concept, the expansion appears feasible. The applicant's on-site evaluator must confirm that the extension is feasible and proviue an amended septic design and plan for septic contractor to install this spring. The on-site evaluator will also be asked to confirm that there is suitable area for an alternate system at a 7 bedroom use level. Staff has asked that this septic information be submitted before formal action of the Planning Commission. Mr. Jensen has advised that it will be available for staff review prior to the January 22nd meeting. • * Zoning File #1613 January 14, 1991 Page 2 Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for a non-rental apartment within the residence located at 315 Tonkawa Road subject to there being adequate septic capacity on the property to support an additional bedroom use within the existing primary system and future alternate on-site sewage treatment site. I i mm' i H v.-r** m Wi I 1 • CITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND OSB APPLICA V jL i PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 315 Tonkawa Road. Qrona Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) nfi-il7-??-idnnPi Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. LiC77Y -T APPLICANT Name Jensen Homes, Inc. * i.**r iwtPhone (home) a7R-nQRfi Ol 150. i/C Phone (work) 4/R-n54fl A_t/iu 12/21 Address 601 Lakeshore Parkway. Suite #1225 City MinnetQn>^ . . ^T09 ONNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)__i^^ .2------------ Name Frank Bennett_____________________ Phone 334-56QQ--------------------- Address 1915 Knox Avenue South City Minnpflpol i«; Zip RR4fi,3 Date Property Acquired December 3, 1990__________ (month/year) I (do) Cdo notj also own the adjacent parcels of land. FBBS - CONDITIONAL USB PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) S150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use m $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more - - , u Grading# seawall# retaining walls within 75 of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTE APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 ~ $175.00 $ 50.00 ~~ $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Appeals Other ~ see fee schedule * * t ' • • * * k- - . r».r ** A.- 'A-- S. I- ...‘t* .•} .T PRESENT OSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District rr .1 Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: Tn cp;»rp fop liyg -in housekeeper and nannv._____________________________________ 2. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature ff Date /2 - 90 ONNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. *7^ ^ ryinr: - .’if- •^ • f RUN DATE 12/10/90 /- BATCH 002 cCi HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0>tlERS LIST PROP ADDR OFflER NAME TAXPAYER NAT^/AODR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME I TAXPAYER NATC/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONI^R NAME TAXPAYER JIAME/AODR 38 05-117-23 22 0007 03960 DAYSIDE RO MICHAEL 6 FILBRANOT MICHAEL FILBRANOT 3960 BAYSIDE RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 05-117-23 23 0021 00309 NESTLAKE ST 6 S PERL A B J PERL GREGG S A BETTE J PERL 309 N LAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 23 0024 00341 NESTLAKE ST RONALO 6 S DEBBIE K OLSEN RONALD OLSEN 341 N LAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 23 0C33 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED MICHAEL G FILBRANOT MICHAEL FILBRANOT 3960 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-117-23 14 0014 04080 BAYSIDE RD M J I M M HARRINGTON MARK t MONICA HARRINGT0T4 4080 BAYSIDE RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-117-23 14 0019 04165 BAYSIDE RO J I M ALT JAMES A i MARIE A ALT 4165 DAYSIDE RO ORONO 55359 I ' ■<. ^ 38 05-117-23 23 0004 03965 BAYSIDE RO FRED BLAtlCH JR FRED BLAfKIH JR 3965 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 0022 ST 38 05-117-23 23 00325 NESTLAKE RAD OLSEN RONALD G OLSEN 341 NEST LAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 23 0025 00349 WESTLAKE ST E T ANDERSON AML RICKETT EDNA T ANDERSON 349 N LAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 06-117-23 11 0006 04010 BAYSIDE RO CURTIS A ELIZABETH LEVANQ CURTIS A ELIZABETH LEVAfK5 4010 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-117-23 14 0017 04105 DAYSIDE RD JOHN D MCDOWELL JOHN D MCDOWELL 4045 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-117-23 14 0020 00405 TONKAWA RO K A C DEDOLPH III KARL A CHRISTINE DEDOLPH C/0 KNUT-KOUPEE PO BOX 8630 MPLS MN 55408 fA't J> V1 ^ ^ 1 t t REPORT NO. PI4S5401 PAGE 2 38 05-117-23 23 0020 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED GREGG S A BETTE J PERL GREGG S A BETTE J PERL 309 W LAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 23 0023 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED RAD OLSEN RONALD 6 OLSEN 341 WEST LAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 23 P 26 00038 ADDRESS In.^iSIGTCD E C GAGE III A B C GAGE EDWIN III A BARBARA GAGE 460 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE m 55356 38 06-117-23 14 0003 04045 BAYSIDE RD JOHN D MCDOWELL JOHN D MCDOWELL 4045 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-117-23 14 0018 04135 BAYSIDE RD CHARLES N A HELEN F HAYSSEN* CHARLES N A HELEN F HAYSSEN 4135 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 ♦ . 4 ‘ i- s f • ' * 06-117-23 16 0021 F B BENNETT « M H BEWETt F B BENNETT t H H BEIMETT 315 TOr«ANA R9 ORONO m 55356 . .1) . \ t * «• • * I i • * ' f. »s{" V ■i c RUN DATE 12/10/90 • t BATCH 002 ; V ; , <Cl-\; , jN t\A. I *» < / PROP AOOR ONICR NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR TOTAL BATCH >*t.. ’ r i ■N 1 V ■ HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OMCRS LIST Vt..i!-!(' } : •’j V 002 00016 u 1 l.v’ i * I '/}( t r i '' f ) y i .•I L ,t: •: ■; f « ► ‘i' ■ H't .-li ■ k ♦ • • * f i ^ , ; ! . • . ’ . - ifi • .S’’s - ■ ‘ ' 'i T- ' ■'•'■ ■ ■ . I'*-'" 5 ■ i,, - • ' ; fV,;. ■ . ,4 . - : fcH •; ' • X.P, • vIn t' ! *. fnA . • • ■•..• •• ■ > .' . v-i'L .•i; 'X i •J . • »• •». * 5'.., -‘■■■K i * t»-. ft * 4 ■ t • ^ - I « '' ■ > ■ i ,.y '^1 r. ■' j * 1 • < • . 4%. i ■ •0'i * • . f ‘.f • t »-• . •l-X » i I V .* % • • ‘ Y. t; ' % • .4 •' •>• r •1* >■ T * /; ♦> # *, • ' » » f-'.' <* • • '4 *y V ■•‘i’ ‘ •• i« t 't'- • . • S. ) ji- t V ■» : •' •I ; • ’. I•r i. I w 1 « ) r I I ^ .», i . 1. ♦ ^ J 4*.:• r! •:• :• ‘ ...}‘r •/ ,. ’* N0.*PMSM01 H- ? M V *. t • REPORT NO PAGE ♦ * ‘ ! i 1:V • l« />•*» -i/: i » •■ ; . •. " •... .t i\ .?'.»• ’• • ‘* : :‘ • ^ * 1 r i ' • • ■ -i?' • .’ t •■» i :i ■ ». > Y Y, ■.[ i\t',: < •» i I ■ • * •. I f: M ( t' 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE DEST OF HY KN0HLED6E AND BELIEF. DATE A «*• \ »> * . ' \ ^ ♦ • . • ’M l ‘ ^ i ■•■ . /'-i-. :• ■■ : V- ' ' ' '.tl| v' If; •; ? ) •;: ;♦ I*--. ‘ f * . sMl ’-V!! V / . ^ • • . ’>*..* • ' i a I V ‘ i* M ‘i jji * V.» »A * fiiriT-- I n • '■} \4 • f i tL j-v.'-U ^ ' il « .V *^.v* •7>',* •.*■ u ' i*.-v V.ti ‘-d/k ♦24 • \ 7 45/ 1 1 \ ^ 30 A N 537.01 !' .N »(20) i 7 457 I 1 i (21)>a :••<” 1 OT«i f ft 1 : • ft 8 • 457 ^'L6o-a 1 291 5?9.43j • j 8 ‘5^.« (22 i j*8 52164 Mil) 8 1 It a (12) 5 521,55 8 ----------- ( 6 24 '1^____a ^ ( 13) 6 ‘j 5I8.C4 rS 8 “■ W ft 1 « * 4! 4< W T u li-a ** ( N) r 514. ^T 8 c ^^3.5 a F V «9 ^^3 ' iO 5 &l 1 ^ 1 »5 ><: # • a (15) 9 ^lO 4A ----r-m NC a ).) 9 /r >iihh « 4 a . rc a (16) » '•:» 70 8 4VJ.4 "> 1 26 /■ •8 21S. S '^(25)8 a (17) "> 414 1 8 221. J i i- •4 8 , 211. 4 .' '6 >o 11 ( 18) ii-1 ■(a ;•213 5 h» •53 a •— ^•5(22)■5i a / tn\ 1} a#*% ij •V ^'.i ' *.:•i:(;^ • mm ■ 1 —;'U»..;T !^:-•~**>rrT*r ~— '■> .-V-i ■' -1. *»■ t. ‘•n m0 —' 1915 Knox Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55403 Decemlkr 14, 1990 DEC 1 7 1380 Planning Commission and City Council Members City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 To Whom It May Concern: This letter is to support our application for a conditional use permit as it relates the consuiiction of a lower level apartment in our new residence at 315 Tonkawa Road in Orono. We purchased this house on December 3,1990 and need to construct a lower level apartment for our domestic employee before we move in April 1990. We ask that you grant this conditional use permit as expeditiously as possible, so that we may complete the construction before we have to move out of our old house in Minneapolis. We need to construct this apanment in our new house for a domestic employee to assist our family, specifically our oldest daughter, on a daily basis. Our oldest daughter 'vas bom with a wide range of special needs and requires more assistance than we alone can give her. After searching for the past two years, we decided to move to Orono because of the excellent public school system and the responsiveness of the school district personnel to meet our daughter's special, unique needs. This apanment is intended for the direct use only of a single or married domestic employee while they are in our employ. We are not going to use the space as a rental apartment to produce any income. The apanment will be provided as a employment benefit to the domestic employee. If you have any questions regarding our plans or our situation, please don't hesitate to call me at my office, 334-5600. Sincerely, Frank B. Bennett rihrfriir- ^ 1 r-tf la-ll * V w i er JIM-. $ f 0 i 3e s ^ -m 1 ' .• |l/—p-L # 1 b 13 r M4 MOUND (For Flow A. ‘ ^ ^ 9 • * /;/. 4.-- /*.. Hr E-19 PROCEDURE o 1200 gpd) A. Sewage Flow Race See D-7 or 1-3, 4, or 5, or u$e mecered value; Flow Rate » 9r<r gpd B. Septic Tank Liquid Volume (see C-3 or C-5) //?.<;/C- gallons / C. Soil Characteristics 1. Depth to restricting layer such as seasonally saturated soil, bedrock, coarse soil, etc. ; _2 ^ Inches •Depth of percolation tests; /<? inches ^ 3. Number of percolation test holes; S holes 4. Ave. percolation race; /I . € mpi __ _ 5. Landslope ■ >7 V / D. Rock Laver Dimensions' 1. Multiply gpd by 0.S3 to obtain required area of rock layer; gpd X 0.83 * 7SO sq ft / 2. Select width of rock layer (10 feet or less) * feet y 3. Length of rock layer ■ Area - Width 750 sq ft - /i? ft ’ / ~ ys.—i^-------/ E. Rock Volume 1. Multiply rock area by rock depth to get cubic fep« of rocl^ 7J_£_sq ft x^^_ft «_rii*f5cu ft / 2. Divide cu f c/sp 27 ci?^^cu yd to get cubic yards; 3. Multiply cubic yards by 1.4 to get weight of rock in tons; 7<r-..7?cu yds X 1.4 - ??. /7/cons F. Pressure Distribution System 1. Select number of perforated la corals 7 i Select perforatioiv spacing7 3. Select perforated lateral length; Note if manifold is at end of rock layer, lateral length is rock layer length a perforation If manifold is in'' y rock layer, lateral one-half rock layer length less half a perforation spacing. Perforated lacer^^ less half spacing, center of length is length t. 4. Divide lateral length by perfor ation spacing to get number of perforations per lateral yv. 5 feet f 3 feet = /i_ ;)ei~ Note: last perforation must be in end cap, (see page E-14) 5. Multiply perforations per lateral bv number of laterals to get total number of perforations; /2 porfs/lac x r lacs 6. Determine required flow ^ by mul f'plying number of| perfora ;..ons by flow' per perforation (see page E-1 perfs x^.Ti'gpm/pcrf .•'gum >/- Wceauired*7. Select minimum required* lateral diameter from cable on Page E-17; e ‘er cable with perforation >-;.ciug, perforation diameter, . mber of perforations per Select minimum dio.-itfcar for perforacetT^ 1 1 _• #inches C. Bcisal Width ^ '"I" ' Percolation race in cop 12 inches of soil is 7 2. Select allowable soil loadinp, rate *rom tabic on paRC E-16; •.* _BPd/ft:^ Mt. K .‘v- To:Mayor Peterson & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson /D. From:Jeanne A. Mabusthr Building & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: January 14, 1991 #1614 Jack F. Rhode, 1690 Shadywood Road Renewal Variance - Public Hearing List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Application Certificate of Mailing/Property Owners List Complete Packet for Review of Application #1491 Renewal Variance Application Planning Commission Minutes 2/20/90 Council Minutes 3/12/90 Resolution 2769 Approving Renewal Variance of 1990 Review of Current Application - Mr. Rhode has applied for a second renewal variance of the original variance application applied for in 1989 (File #1381). The applicant proposes no change from the original application proposed in 1989. Resolution #2769 will expire March 12, 1991. The applicantion involves the construction of a new residence using the foundation of the previous resid'^nce. The existing principal structure is located 55' from the lakeshore. The new principal structure shall be 61* resulting from the removal of grade level cement understructure. The improvement does involve expansion of the building envelope approximately 15' northward within che 75' setback area resulting in 177 s.f. of new principal structure or hardcover and 35 s.f. of upper balcony area. With concurrent removals of existing hardcover, there is an overall reduction within 0-75' setback area of 114 s.f. or 1.9%. Hardcover within the 75-250' setback area is proposed at 24.85% (increased from 2,290 s.f. or 19.7%). For greater detail of the actual proposal, please review Exhibit C, the complete packet prepared for the first renewal variance in 1990. The staff memo lists all required variances to be approved. Exhibit F, Resolution #2769, approving the first renewal variance contains all necessary findings and conditions for approval. Isv —fa III \ .m-r'l IJ' . Ifr ClTt OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) -I • » A*.•j y' ' 1 V. • «• w a t a * I f f *fW tl« 1 I I Wl •J'liunjr-;v.;rr -rr:rr f .aJ’. rfVk. w*l < ^U4a;-r-i. Wfc'V.;-v'vv'\'v ' j Clajt iw.w ' ■-'“AUl m m f I ' ‘XV'' V. w; PROPERTY LOCATION rn:£i>r-'rf/^K m Site Address /^?0 Tfr-.v TXVV.'VV UV'V'A nv*^ .‘XW^Vt. Property Identification Number (P.I-D.) /"?“-//“7fT^ 00/7 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. y^CL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT Name _ Address is^/^S^S'City Phone (home) -^7/— Z/Q/ _ _ Phone (work) SSS''~OS'O/ CO^A/O) ^ , yWZip-. ^S9A ONNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address:City;Zip: Date Property Acquired / ^ ^"7 (month/year) I (do) ([do no^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. rA- PRESENT OSE OF PROPERTY ^ Present Zoning District ^ Present Use of Property ^:”Residential> Other (specify) Kt‘ s DESCRIPTION OF RBQOEST Estimated Construction Cost $ « Describe request in detail: ------------------ W VARIANCES REQUIRED S'm ft Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback: Variances (Front Side Rear)• Other J L.. r: i. \ ■SL. • t . 12/2d. , i -i r “I BAROSHIP Describe undue hardship or prachi enforcement of zoning regulations: u i ^ 'A ^ ' difficulty resulting from strict 2. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS CertiHed Proptrty^ List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). ^ Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). . , ^ Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8>i xll for reproduction). , u Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy SJj-xll"). Slcetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8Ji"xll"), As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application, Pl^se remember that vour variance application is not__complex—if—the—above < tiaoraation has not been included. APPLICAMT'S SIGNATURE . ^ « The applicant hereby agrees to provide al”. information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's Signature Data ONHBRS SIGNATURE ^ « a.uThe owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agentiSp Coinnii.8sioA members# and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled Beetings of the Planning Coeimlssion and Council. If an applicant a unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please maJce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building s Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. CERTIFICATE OP MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) S8. ) CITY OF ORONO ) I, Linda Vee, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1614, was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 2nd day of January, 1991. f »•f- ' ym MSI y' W:mkr>^■■ ■■-.■ >:T r> • H.. i y*.- ■'y*..V * • V:f. (■ Pv /*■ I . ^ ■ i V' “i s - t) "V-' ^ ^ 1 5. 1^1 > mm f: .RUN DATE 11/10/86 BATCH 002 PROP ADOR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 17-117-23 21 0006 01675 SHADYMOOO PO RICHARD 0 NORUH A HIFE RICHARD HORUh 1675 SHADYHOOD ROAD HAYZATA MN 55391 HENHEPIM COUtITY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWERS LIST 38 17-117-23 21 0005 01719 EAGERNESS POINT RO LAUPEEN E DARLirJG LAUREEN E DARLING 1719 EAGERNESS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 REPORT NO. PI635601 PAGE 6 38 17-U7-23 21 0016 01650 SHADYHOOO RD K H ROELOFS ETAL K H ROELOFS 1650 SHADYNOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR ■ M PROP ADOR 0I8IER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 17-117-23 21 0015 01670 SHADYNOOD RD THOMAS R SARENPA ETAL THOMAS R SARENPA 1670 SHADYNOOD ROAC NAYZATA MM 55391 38 17-117-23 21 0010 01710 SHADYNOOD RD HARRY L MEYER ETAL DALE C PALM 1710 SHADYNOOD RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 21 0016 01680 SHADYNOOD RD JOHN 6 DOLEMAH ETAL JOHN 6 DOLEMAN 1680 StiADYNOOD ROAD NAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 21 0019 01720 SHADYNOOD RO N I J KEENE NILLIAM H I JANICE M KEENE 1720 SHADYNOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 38 17-117-23 21 0017 01690 SHADYNOOD RO JACK F RHODE JACK F RHODE 3155 NORTH SHORE DR HAYZATA MN 55391 TOTAL BATCH 002 00008 iJL. O' C3 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESEMTEO ARE AH ACCURATE AHO TRUE PEPRESEHTATIOH OF IHFORItATIOM AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE OH THE RECORDS OF THE HEiniEPIM COUHTY DEPARTHEIIT OF PROPERTY TAXATIOH, TO THE BEST OF HV KHC!4LE0GE AHO DCLIEF. DATE mmM cm or OKMO______ ruMRSB oononra mniM TOnOMT. JMDUX U. IfflTiOl fjk UTS aBM BOM) non - ctwm. omhb 1. »1S12 OirUtopUM 8«I« * 8«rl Lm Mal»oa. 40tS t 4105 li«t«rtc«ni toad - »ubdl»liion of > tot tlno BoarronfMOBt •rr flro* tad toaooth ■opklat, S9 r«mdAl« GrMfi - miirniaAry tnbdirimitm 3. imc C*ry nret i k«bd *wi CoaditiottA^ Om - Public ■•arliif Acnoa rRMf ♦ 1570 Oinek Domor. J»*» Ct»«'^ _______Conditional Oto Ttrnlt - Coatlaaotlon of tabUe aonrln* OliOO Mclft Sopor Tain, 3J33 Shorollno PrlTO - Vtrluieo/CooMxelal Sito flan Sooloo - Contlnootlon of Public Boaclas 01*04 Clair Sood, 3313 ranwood Oay -Conditional Oao Potmlt - Continnatlon of PnbUe Boaxlaf •1.05 »r. Slchard tlnd.tr-, 10.5 b-t P-bdal. bood - V at IUMA - ContlJlttAtiOA ol Public lAATlny .1.11 broo. 4 C-111. cortlaa. U30 Pa-rnao. Point bo«i - Aftar-tha-fact Tariancaa - Pob*io laarmo ♦1*13 Janam lo—a me., 315 T—kaaa toad - Conditional Oao Parnlt - Public baarlao .1.14 Jaob bboda, l.M ‘banaoal Parian— - PnbUe baarlaf • 1*10 Cloria 311—r, 35 Ora— Orabard Bead toartb - Propoaad Subdlvlal— •1*17 Hare bbltabaad Proposod Subdlvlal— •1*10 Willi— Propoaad Tarl—caa U30 tya— a—n— - racai, 1350 Saldnr Part bead - ■; r. :| 'V' -i ■ . 7;>‘, JO *.a « . . .4 S; ■» ■ v::: V.v:_r. ‘ liiiiiii ap J......... USSiSI? f.-Tr- •// 0^ kiijLjfp*u%^ IWtWCTtOW WtCQHO D*Tt COMTUANCi "7z2it£L rAtP-,t«rt»UAmrJ cum F^ 7-IT)-A/ JrfOiJ_______ ^ />Jo sufcAAtjiiic. A«iir»C> PUMPOUT AKXWD 3;F- life - Jf a;S ■::i W\" Mi. -iife ■KK X-.ZKnxrsm- — v;^ l^m . »w»w3» :a\ j:-£*V.sy:. . : V-D:^i-^ ' .^fi^ti£i£yfeS.-pWji' ~Pf9^m Vi *■ 7 ■ ' >7 *-p:r;7 V- wM: sr— ■» l»3W~«^Ne • 3E~«|4L> Jzjjgw^oMkazS _______________ 1^ j^^nvp- R,^F.REEMA8.^%> ‘ «• jR^3=?5i:.\ < I I e M- Certificate of Survey for B. Charles Downey of Lot 136, Spring Park Hennepin County. Minnesota V / Ua«l Deicriptlon Let 13S. Spring Park »-7-82 5-16-90 I * •10' iron Marker found iron Marker set Date Scalee 0 Bearings shown are to an astuMed datuM. ».<w- «un— : m»rn» r*m /-wr/ 'mJ •JUL 9—X.I* 'o ^ C^MwCrwV^ • e-*"" This survey shOwS the location of all existing buildings and visible “hardcover" In relation to the boundaries of the above described property. Ir does not purport to show any other tnproveeents or encroachaents. I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by ne or under My direct supervision and that I am a duly regist ered land surveyor under the laws of the State of Minne sota. COFFIN 6 6R0NBER6, INC. nark S. Sronber^ in: tit. Nd. 1Z755 Engineers. Land Surveyors. Planners Long Lake. Minnesota V 0fi»»”V tVeJi Vx«»»-*» US') Axa<s j|«* H'iAi. te.ywv.^. '-a xAn,""- V 'T.^n.W xn' vyetL. «« I#"5 ** l-»T I, ttStK rrwmiTi OF lahooom M«ii trr 1 •« width g= " ! I ca RD. 15 (U(Hm Wiotn ‘,'W ^ ..'2y________ ,________wirwuT iioto-^ . ’7, ■^t'cPrn":- r' 4 i 'il“- '‘1'4S- iir N= L._ ^__ ^ / ' X.: ■ ^ -F \ * I tHOSKM CONTROL FtNCt ^ , *M T0» WTO »!' tl. •* TORtOR. AND too -U. tHRUtt AT RAM OR WAU OtLIVlRr RAMR CONC. DOCK ttev: Sa tT -X—a J’f mif lo-R I ^ I ' / |T«»|T| av fA*l( I ‘ tries at corner -r RIRLACI cleared EOUMM' NfTM NATURAUma TREES and SHRUU - —-----!■•< »» jiM5, emoT iJm, . \ ^ % 'TAfisiTE or ‘.ANsrcN Park « si# rrt ff\ ® I C O : ■. ■" ., I .J A\rt*" pFx:'A iPfe ito' s»s -•*<!£.•«. <~Ny,T.ST ELEVATION I' ■ la~-mt ">3 'vfV.iW • -i -.<, i i-JL: •r r*^i'W ■ ''l44'‘H'ii?;H" ■ J laija—isa ■~^4' »Mt »*•••••** fi ■■ -iM--*- j ................‘'^ lit,.4 ^/€ f’*: - ‘’’ ♦ -o'"' -•••• '4 ^/^U!UtATIc/^ Ce>'i /^eiic.y\f>r <^D- m• ' .-;f 1 2. ■ r fe:i: . : ■ ■!#<■ of lot ?7, f«9erncst lying Nortli and East of a lino do^crlbpi) a:i folloM!.; Coauaenrincj at a point on in* *m" ih* Linden Avenue Mhich said point Is Marked by a juduclal aKiiiiiaiont, a distance of 1/S feet Hurt hoastei I y * Southwest corner of said Lot 21, (hence hearing South 34*14' Last a distance of 69.00 feni tu a puini ai enl; thence continuing on an eitensiun of said line to the shuii> of take Minnetonka and lying South and olloMC CoMMencing at a point on the Southeasterly line of Under the linden Avenue a distance of loo fevti aight line bearing Morth SS^OO' Fast froo the heninnind point ot the Soul tiwester i y line mI this ir^'' I L It-. ■;._____r SKETCH FOITJACK f. RHODE iruurlL’”*'® ”• StIADYHOOO HENNEPIN coimrr, hthnesota /C-if* \ H I • vi. . SCALE OATS e 1* . 20* <201-86 Iron a«rk*f CERTIFICATE Cf SURVEY FOR JACK F. RHODE in lots 10 AND 11. SHAOYWOOD HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA I horrbjr cortify th*t this is « trv« «nO corroct r»ures»ntitl''h of a survey of th« boundarioi of all of Lot 10 and that part of Lot 11 a-scriOed as follows; Baginnin^ at tha Northwast comar of said Lot 11; thanca Southerly along the Westerly line thereof to the Southwest corner of the North 14 f»et of said Lot 11; thence South 87 degrees 27 ■inutei East to the shore of Crystal Bay; thence North along said shore to the North line of said Lot 11; thence West along said lot line to the point of beginning, in Shadywood. and the location of all existing buildings thereon. It does not purport to show other Inprovements or encroachaients. fiote- Bearings shown are shown on the plat of 'Shady Mood' and the Southerly line of the above described property 1$ assuaed to be described in relation to said plat bearings. coffin t SR0NSER6, INC. Mark S. Gronberg Lie Ucr Z7S5 Engineers. Land Surveyors t Planners Long Lake. Minnesota 'i ' y<k •411-''*^ / / / Ip ' •' - ' // ' C' i; ; f \ \, V w'. y / / ; \ \ p\S u -*t-jrr M __ s I/-. ;/4;#lii" pp ■ _.-iA— ! t.fv ' 2.<r*^. Aft Irt'xiW t,K*fr ^ J.JV/-»«f/ 2-^oa AC. Af'?'" aryiS-W »-MV4i>>r «r I 7t»!Z^, '/ /f.U/£X'„. tWUJW*wt-rr-n / Vd?o' C*rttfie«t« ■of Bamr* I harotgr oMrtlXy tlwt IMa U • troa atad eonooi rapraaaatatloa of a aaavar of tl>o tomdarlaa of that part of ttM MwtliMaat qaartar of tha Rorthwaat qoartar of SoetloB 2, Tovaaltlp U7 Bortb, Raiico 23 Uoat of tba 5th Frlaelpai Iteridlaa, daaerlbad aa teclmliv at tha fcrtfaMaat «ormr of aald harthooat ^oartar of tha Norttw waat 4|aartar| tfaaaea Baat alaac tba North liw of aald Northwaat ^■artarof tha lorthwaat qoartar a dlataaco of 690.60 foot; thoBca % ■ ' »':y.' : n mm #- Cn< U m ,f H u mtf » ro4t »f £n $f m. Si^ *f S«( V % r-- ., ) 9- - zyiy> ie*i$ jrt «V^.JLj»a FA8CtU_ g. - liiodi N0*H*n«- - Cm^ lint tf iHt vnetf 10.0 sem tf Mt* ptti »t*^ thtf^ W* Th* »!»«♦ ’<5 «cr** 1 t? 1I« ;i, MitU'): ii»» S*«tth *t!il »f>ut l.••l^^•l iy I.f »h» rwtl»iliri» of t h« SlTHith ttatvttrwn *i.s«d, »i> > all*-1, 4n4 itoith at t»>* vi<|li* -it nay >it ttw* rt»<-*ii. Shot* l.ifw Hailady Cn*|iany 4a». » iIs«hI »n iWa^i to aai'l '■'o«H'any rai-utitort in Mutiii »yi of t>v*Ua, p^-ya 4"* ••n*l Ka«» of lha Hast inda ol tfca Cant | of t ha SI f «.t aaiit «»•» nw 1' , Kuccrri That |wr» of tha :i«>ut haan* • hia y*>ian», isy :,f Sa< I ton t). Townnhii' I’B, aatwya <la»'.-r ibail an fcllown: CtnMwm'i n<| at ■ |^«int in t ha baotatliMt ct tha Stiuth »at»ften»n Road, aat't |a,if«t brtti<i tha •►’ithaant fornar of th« Haat '.V aciaa r.t that pai t -f tha Kan* '>>•* »a H <K i) I tha Soiithaant '>na yuaitwr (SC j) nf Sa.'tion rinttinhlp MS, »a»M»a H ahJ'-h 1 laa South and fkHjthaantai >y of tt»a . antailtna of tha South tfatartoan Road, mo rallad, aiwl Sort h of f h» ii^ht of aay <f • ha l.iacttii.' Shot! i.ina Railaay C<i«pany >tan rtba<l in ifaa.l t« aai<f C:mpmn^ lacoyrtsKi in Buok 7SI ol llaada, y%a ta *<»4. and Ranf of tha Moat J*: tods of tha Cast >teadialf (l y) of tha Soalhaaat Tn# Sact ioh ft I tbaaL-* lltwatiaant at 1 , a'o>tn| said ikI») t hath-a > .uth parailaJ aith tha l.an< lina of *a i I tan a. ta trait to a print in a Itria i imn i tm ttastatiy a* tityht analan ft<» said ra»t t ina at « point distant fawnty four t<4i rials South ftoa tha fatin* of baait't-tndt t ham-a Cast alimi| aaid risht anal# I iha to tha Cast Itna .d , I tan aara Ita-d; • ham's Rostb laaoly four I^Si rtMts to tha latint ol oauinninu, *r»« • «e«.OM t.i« ar'taa iiiiuartar tus it of said i-nntBr \ ; IS a Jiatai.,, of T.SAtU (Host ha propartyl That psti of tha oouttiaaaf yuartai of :ia<,-ti<‘n Jl, 'tinriishii t’(t, H.«n^ das'-ribaii a< follownt fuatinanc i no at a fioird in f tia usntar lina of tha South Watarlotm Risd, said point hatnif • ht* fh.rtfinast romor of tha hanl 10 ai.-raa of that part of tha Kast Half d tha Sout.haaat .’oartai of fiaot lot, Jt 118 Jt ahi'h lias South and SouMiiraat ar I y of ttia caiitar lina of thi> South Hatartown Hoad, so i-ai lad, and Najrtti ol ttia rufht -ol -way of tha Rlactrif Siiort l.itia Hallaay risitfsny das.-i ibaii in dsitl to said (.-twfsiiy tairordal in lk.>oK t'.l of lauHfs, pa a*' 404, and East of ttia haat thirty tiva rods ■>! tha Eaat Half of tha routti*-aBt yuaitai of said Sai-tion I’i than, a ht 11 hwas* at 1 y aloii«f said ■•ontar I ii»a It distanca r<l I 1 »e rods; t twin a South parall'd with tha East lliia of said tan doia traft to a isjinl in a 1 iita runnind Wasloily at i t»|hf andlas Itnwi .said list i : r,a at a pi.iint distant twanly four rods South f rt* tha point of ta*^ 1 hn t nif I thant"a hast alond ‘mhI ri|li* antla lina to ttia Hant 1 i na of Mid tan a.ia ita<-t| t hanoa Hotth tv«t,ry f,,ur irsls to Ilia point of bad i»»* l*d * S'.'mrdln<i to tha aap r*i plat tharaof on f I la or of racord In tha of ft"# of 'tM* Haqlutar d Urotii.' in and f d sai l •\»unt y of Hannapiri and Slata id Mtnnaaata. Arad - acios .Osf^.Ss Tha* part -f tha Southaast ’^iai**T ■ f Sa< tion It, T:ismshi|> i I8# Rattita /I, daSi I ihad as foli iasl I'lssatuir-1 ruf at a point in tt»a canlarlltta of tha Houth ■«*«-ttoaii R..uid, said ptilrif im i iny i ha >l<ir»‘*ast oornai ol »ha hart In ai-raa d mat I«ri of ttia last l*a 11 .f tha ?t,.j!*,aast ,riai>at .d 11 m 11-118 f“ a*i',.h Smith ainl Sou* haastai ' , if »tw* rantarlina <t tha .■^•nith aa*arlo»n Road, so all.d, .*0.1 t»ni I h of Ilia i i dht of aay .d tha fMaitlii Stiort l.ina RailMay 'Va»J>an> tas -i -t.-ai) i' daa i !■ sa 1 isH'any rsw-ordail in Br«iH ,,f >aa,l!., pna> 14, aisi t'a»t ,.» ‘ h* Sast 1' t-'l.i t said Ctst H,,n ,-,1 Ihmthr'sst >uartsr d '.aid ...avt'ott 'ij tHatv>- > r* liaast ai ly oirno said lantarlina a fiataona of t .sis to tha av tvial 1*011*1 -. t t a-ainmnd of t na istKi ts*i*wi Ivaraiii i.hssi’t itwifl thaitca <t»M i nu ■ n-t (ho • iiiaast ar ly al»ar| sail .anlatiina tr a point nsl# bast at ti-ih* a»»l'as ti.sn t i*s tas* lina f said 1’ aora *ra<-tj ttisaua Sivith fs*i*l;ol t' sai l t.as* lin. t listsn-a . f '4.1 fnat; thai..-a Cast 111 a point rs! a iina dtawn Jt«mth 'I th< piitif of qat ■iin<n>f an*! parallel to t h** East of said Ui aotf ' rao* I 'har.a Rutth f ■> t tm fstini f tiaoniumi, si'cordirn t.. t h** '.S, drv«insMt*i< lutvai »hara..f. Mayor Cldffc \r*a ' ,jr-* W WS p «V* ■■ *'r w a ’W —S -sHwa-w aM »*S* 5 S* • 4,.!, Sss «tS»SS va*4 4rr.ay«* pras* *44 saari* »»s "a*# *• l»-ssa*t *s 'r: a 1 / s.4401. IhO-JIiil AI.HIETR0 LAND SORVEYOBS^ r?40 Jor siy Stf«*', !. ;>'i9 Iaiie. M'- ' Etota 55356 t*t 4^5 - i435 r - m' -'T«ar- 3wr- PREPARED FOR; EARLIN KOSTKA. LOT suwygrs counkNY. inc. lano suftv£r6M§ nar r.i. 4«s»-T ft n #1 kPRELIMINARY PLAT OF: J& A ^ FAIRWAY HILLS ADDITION THE CITIES OF ORONO AND WAYZATA >xK)mrx* "WCm. • (P.Un. Burt rf Ur >S, Witoe** <.« Na. / Ow<y , '.vine t *9, / («9. •?. ■sH-.®. ? («. i.i; w .v:v4«-«,n, i» «JAmtm mmrnr m, »!. j iP. ■-ot •. tt«e* *, »-^-yr. ; Har® ;pii«- or - v4«.jqoi> ♦ ■ 1^* -rf .tel- *. • ;• V ^mrtmr md !?*«§ »«r,i ml im»t « u* /a.Mivtwft 4«Krib«*l tia*- M -iiirw* M % awf% '.i^r n2.3i fmt Z • •^u* •*« t!** MWOI t»0 9 %m»4 M*t<*r «n^ iMr* *t^ or *-’»# :>mM« y tft t e rtytw. tte mm Mm or wt4 lm S .» M«owa ’o Hmt teh 0 1«g-«M X» ■ioatM »lr«. ftTM - 2 ’0,c^' i« - 5..-. ..1, . . V.LT ; • Nn Mt ^ ^ eexes i,.234 . «* . V OHSai A Mftp '«it IS»^79 .-. J.|f V:rr»») , ■ ■' *1. *t.»Hrnr»t Atr«s» '-dm H.* .^1 *M« Tw®l Arm » Mtftm] - *ft, ft». •».« ,.v » T*r Ji*.. »-,f «Mt f«KMr Og in':*# «1 «arwt«i« ftmi M*- 4». H r»^.r 'cm C®.e.VJI » AIJ.; *.! tr u') V r«* >M tt>* m«r«« or uw ettr of >«»a. OWMW. f oro^ 'on .fr r«*ot » *» «1M MO oroimrot lr m «r *i4o •« i«Mr: fMorM*<€^ mt tl*« . m • *r^ '-4M fttf***^ r ^ um of t*» of tfoiMiriii. iKoi tIkM **rfc Oar ar j«r«s*or. ’♦n' ■■■ w«j:ii. <.»■. <iM. «. V4./ // I7f1___t' '^f l M Ofe-M* M-AA-OOM 4^. r.ML ^ Sitrvvrs C-niwv, Ute. ^’1 ' 'r J Avar M iwth »«BM»8US <•< SWt» **»»•' >N>10S3 PKLIMINMV PLAT OP: ^ 1 FAIRWAY HILLS ADDITION THE CITIES OF ORONO AND WAYZATA JSS>* ' ^ ’ t *YTj-^Q p«T* •.»! *c mta vr* *«t* ««R «T *Mt !!&• lTL«g >MR1 n« mt a( M /•...miit Awcritxri auw ! . )!«.k ». .TaA: -' "aiitt** 14 a«Mtii 4«|rMa J* ■ A«t«« i! »*:■» 4a **»r Ji;. ;; r'«K ”^**'***’* ^rt«r (Tii rlia.'* -♦'N a*t .«*. ^ *.!»« rntrpo J .1 Ut«M to ko«r 4hk )i a •i04t«i« »«rM. U«»4> r«.M. «fc>u«-w-o*.ac)aM tC,. Kt SKETCH PLAN ^ . Of #1317 Whitehead Property w<sg" *^0Xvy*r^ --------- --------------- - <>«nn^<7' jvr /4» ^.»/ir »AII &”*L J ____ •s1he ;.r^ r.T'S,"; r* JSL:rr^ r.E v IE se -—------------ my*0^-------- - -*:/«/___ SMERILA ^Ip’'"'■■fitASSOCIATES '-*••»«’i fit ASSOCIATES E**iNtMNG JiJ»rtriMO •'t'fVl