HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-20-1991 Planning MinutesMINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
HELD MARCH 2C, 1991
ATTENDANCE
The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the
following members present: Planning Commission Chair Charlie
Kelley and Planning Commission Members Maureen Bellows, Jim
Hansen, Candace Rowlette. Sara Moos, Ed Cohen, and Jeff Johnson
were absent. The follov/ing represented the City Staff: Building
and Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning
Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Scheffler. Kelley
called the meeting to order at 4:03 p.m.
(#1)ZONING FILE #1457 ft #1630-ALAN G. CARLSON
3140 WATERTOWN ROAD
AMENDED PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING
Gary Peterson was orecent on behalf of Alan Carlson.
Kelley re-convencJ the Public Hearing on this matter at 4:03
jp • in •
Mabusth noted that Outlot B is proposed to be developed with
a gazebo, as well as a tennis court. She said, "I have nothing
specific to show you regarding the gazebo, but have been told
that it will contain a lavatory, which would have a holding tank.
The holding tank would require City Council approval. Staff's
concern pertains to the way in which a 10,000 ton pump truck
would access the holding tank, since there is only a trail
leading to this structure."
-
Kelley asked Gary Peterson if he .ould prefer to have the
matter tabled until more inforaation oen oo provided relative to
the gazebo.
Peterson asked if the Planning Commission could give
conceptual approval, pending review of the plans.
Kelley stated that he would not give conceptual approval,
but he would make a recommendation on the preliminary
subdivision, excluding the tennis court and gazebo.
Hanson stated that though he did not totally approve of the
structures being located on an outlot, he approved of having one
tennis court, as opposed to several private tennis courts. He
said, "I think a holding tank could be reached with a hose, if
necessary."
Rowlette indicated that she
bike trails in the wetland area,
two applications.
was concerned about locating
She suggested separating the
Kelley stated that the issue of the accessory structures on
- 1 -
k Af.l<k Aft «
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING (RE-CONVENE) HELD MARCH 20, 1991
(#1 & #2)ZONING FILES #1457 & #1630-ALAN CARLSON CONTINUED
an outlet constitutes a new policy issue. He suggested that the
Planning Commission vote >^n the issues covered under existing
ordinances, and allow the City Council to adaress the new policy.
Kelley closed the Public: Hearing at 4;i0 p.m.
m
It was mv'vjd by Kelley, seconded by Hanson, to recommend
approval of the preliminary subdivision, excludinj the proposed
bike trails, tennis court and gazebo, which should be considered
by the City Council because there is no existing ordinance to
address the issue of accessory structures on outlets. Hanson
noted that such issues could be considered if this were a PRD
rather than a straight plat. Bellows noted that at such time the
issue is referred back to Planning Commission, that the applicant
jjg prepared to show plans and elevations for the pj,oposed
structures. Motion, Ayes~4, Nays-0. Motion carried.
(#3)ZONING FILE #1621-TERRY ft JONELL JOHNSON
1045 LINDEN LANE
VARIANCBS-CONTINOATION OF PUBLIC HEARING
It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Hanson, to table this
application, as requested by the applicants. Motion. Ayes-4,
Nays-0. Motion passed.
(«4)ZONING FILE #1622-F. JOHN HARDIN
1496 PARK DRIVE
VARIANCE-CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING
John Hardin v/as present.
Kelley re-convened the Public Hearing at 4:12 p.m.
Hardin showed the- Planning Commission the floor plan for the
proposed addition in relation to the existing house.
■.■■■jrrSFF :
Kelley closed the Public Hearing at 4:13 p.m.
It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to recommend
approval of a front yard setbacx Variance to construct an
addition to an existing residence at 1496 Park Drive, based on
the hardships posed by the shape of the lot, tne inadequate size
of the existing bedrooms, and the location of neighboring houses
in relation to the street. Motion. Ayas-4, Nays-0. Motion
passed.
1
m.- ■;? ■
- 2 -
■i : . I '
M
*1 .5
f'
^ •
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING (RE-CONVENE) HELD MARCH 20, 1991
«l*f- *
ij (#5)ZONING FILE 11623-KEENAN & JEAN RICHARDSON
2500 WOODHAVEN DRIVE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING
Keenan and Jean Richardson was present.
h
;
Kelley re—convened the Public Hearing at 4*34 p.m.
Gaffron explained for the benefit of. Dr. Richardson the past
policy of the Planning Commission regarding after-the-fact
penalty fees, noting that the Planning Commission does not have
the authority to waive the requirement.
At 4:16 p.m., Kelley closed the Public Hearing.
It was moved by Bellov/s, seconded by Hanson, to recommend
approval of a Conditional Use Permit for Keenan and Jean
Richardson, according to Staff recommendations pertaining to
penalties arid fees. Motion, Ayos-4, Nays-0. Motion carried.
-,r-™
(#6)ZONING FILE #1624-DAVID CARLSON
(SHORELINE MARINA A YACHT CLUB)
1955 SHORELINE DRIVE
COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEIJ-CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING
Steven Fichtel and Dave Carlson were present.
At 4:37 p.m., Kelley re-convened the Public Hearing.
Mabusth provided a brief review of the application for the
benefit of Rowlette.
Rov/lette questioned whether the Planning Commission had
raised concerns about the second level deck being located v/ithin
the 75 foot setback area.
Kelley, Bellows, and Hanson explained that the majority of
the structure is located within the 75 foot setback area, which
frequently occurs with marina facilities.
Kelley asked Staff to convey to Council the Planning
Commission's concerns regarding the underground gas tanks and
fuel dock, as discussed at the March 18, 1991 Planning Commission
meeting.
Kelley closed the Public Hearing at 4:20 p.m.
It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Hanson, to recommend
approval of the Commercial Site Plan for Dave Carlson. Shoreline
Marina and Yacht Club, as presented. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0.
Motion carried.
■ ■4
d- ■ V
m---m - 3 -m
_Ul
■
lift Jill, I -hi
PIANNING COMMISSION MEETING (RE-CONVENE) HEED MARCH 20. 1991
(#7)ZONING FILE #1625-DON OLSON
4590 NORTH ARM DRIVE
VARIANCE-CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING
Don Olson was present.
Kelley opened the Public Hearing at 4:.21 p.m.
Mabusth briefly reviewed the Olson's application.
The Public: Hearing was closed at 4:24 p.m.
'■ti
Motion carried.
I
(#8)ZONING FILE #1626-TIM » BETH TRAFF
2683 NORTH SHORE DRIVE
VARIANCE-CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING k k i f
Tim Traff was present, as was Karen Schriver,
Robert Mitchell, Attorney for James Matchell, the Traff s
neighbor.
Kelley re-opened the Public Hearing at 4:25 p.m.
W'
Tim Traff showed the location o£ the average lakeshore
setback line, after it had been moved back an additional five
feet, as he agreed with his neighbor, Rollin Lacy, that he would
do. Traff also showed the Planning Commission a fx^or plan or
the proposed house.
Karen Schriver reiterated the pvosition of James and Pitricia
Mitchell, as noted in their letter to the City, and the comments
made by their Attorney, Robert M.Ltchell. at the Mar-h 13, 1991
Public Hearing.
.At 4:34 p.m., Kelley closed the Public Hearing.i
It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Hanson, to recommend
denial of the side setback Variance to construct a new
residential structure, based on the Planning Commission s belief
that a new structure should meet all required setbacks, and that
there is no demonstrated hardship to warrant the Variance
requested. Mr. Traff disagreed, stating that his P---an wil
reduce hardcover and place the house .14 feet further
property line than where the e>cisting house now stands. He
stated that the new house will increase tax revenues for the City
of Orono, and that he should be allowed to have his home the way
he would like it. Traff added that he should be allowed to place
his home as close to the average lakeshore setback line as
- 4 -
I • -.-A
V.
_ _ _ _ _t k ■
ii~ ■ \ ,• - ■
'
-I
■jv
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING (RE-CONVENE) HELD MARCH 20, 1991
(#8)ZONING FILE 11626-TRAFF CONTINUED
oossible to take t‘ne most advantage of tne recreational#
and arL variance because the hardship runs with the land because
the cTty recognized the lot as buildable, and it is sewered.
HaLon agreed. Motion, Ayes-3. Kelley, Nay. Motion carried.
(#9)ZONING FILE #1627-SAM MCCLOUD
application #1627, as requested by the applicant. Motion,
Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion carried.
(#10)ZONING FILE #1628-SARA ft MARK FINNEY
4195 HIGHffOOO ROAD
VARIANCE-CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING
Sara Finney was present.
Kelley re-convened the Public Hearing at 4:36 p.m., and
reviewed the Planning Commission's views regarding this
application and the intent of the average lakeshore setback.
lakeshorrstruc\®ure^^co^^ of^reLi^ning walls, and a stairway.
Mabusth replied, "We were unable to meet Sara o.n-site, but
did have an opportunity to discuss the structure with her. T lere
i3 a deck which would appear to not meat the City s jafct
landing standards. The structure is approximately eight to ten
years old. It may be appropriate for tha Planning Commission to
include in their recommendation a statement pertaining to this
structure being recognized as a non-conforming structure.
City cannot guarantee that the applicants will be a ow
rebuild the deck at such time that it deteriorates, and any
structural repairs that are deemed necessary will have to fa-
approved by the City."
Hanson was concerned about treating this non-conforming
structure in a manner different than the way such structures are
normally addressed, though he fully understood the innocence o.
the Finney's and the owners of the property prior to them.
Bellows asked what measures the City w.ill take to assure
that the Finney's and any other owners of this property
understand the restrictions regarding the lakeshore structure.
Mabusth stated that the resolution would include language
mm
- 5 -
i
m
'T^
*-tv-.' ' '
,v >?
;-'-.k..'.
pfe
!'#
RV'
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING (RE-CONVENE) HELD MARCH 20, 1991
(410)ZONING FILE 41628-FINNEY CONTINUEDplacing present and future
nwners of this property on notice that the structure cannot be
without council approval, a„d that remov,.l may be
reauired, as well ae a conforming access structure installed in
the future. She added that the structure does serve a function
as it supports the lakeshore bank.
Kelley closed the Public: Hearing at 4:40 p.m.
•::--ss,£7rr s.:;;::
niaatic beneath landscaped areas.P structure itself, and present thatmeasurements of the
information to Council.
Road The hardship for the Variance is the topography o,. the
land* It is further recommended that the applicant be placed on
noSiie that any structural repairs to the existing non-conforming
in '^the laKesho.e yard shall be subject Clf,
aoDroval. The aoplicant is directed to wo..k with S..aff <•
minimise the visual impact of the structure. Motion, yes
Nays-0. Motion carried.
(#11)ZONING FILE #1629-MCNULTY CONSTRUCTION
1700 FOX STREET
VARIANCE-CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING
Jim McNulty and Hugh McMillan were present.
Kelley re-opened the Public Hearing at 4:45 p.m
Gaffron reviewed the applicant's request, noting ^^at the
total square footage of the structure, including the proposed
addition^ would be less than the square footage approved when the
building was first constructed.
Hanson and Bellows stated their positions on the original
application to construct this a^^ssory structure, as w^eli as
rd^^ha^^sSlps"^ “ ior the
that has not changed. She added tnat tne
Ordinance specifically designed to address such
which provides even more basis for denial. on this
commented that though there is an existing residenue on this
property to accompany the accessory structure, it is for the most
part unoccupied, and serves mainly as a guesthouse.
- 6 -
.•V, •j.f.Jt
lit I
.»
m
.«
■ 1%
Lt-«k *t£ ^ .L r«k Aj*)Wk m
■>. ■
••• ^ .'.. 'V
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING (RE-CONVENE) HELD MARCH 20, 1991
(#11)ZONING FILE #1629-MCNULTY CONSTRUCTION CONTINUED
Rov/lette stated that the house may not be occupied on a full
time basis, however, it is a primary structure.
Mr. McNulty reiterated the points made at the March 13. 1991
Public Hearing, and showed Rowlette a sketch of the existing
building and the proposed addition. He also displayed a
photograph of the structure.
Kelley closed the Public Hearing at 4:58 p,m.
It was moved by Hanson, seconded by Rowlette, to recommend
approval of aoplication #1629, in accordance with the conditions
set forth in Resolution #2204. Motion, Ayes-2, Bellows, Kelley,
Nay. Motion carried.
(#12)RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL-HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY
Kelley asked Rowlette if she had any comments regarding her
stated position on the Highway 12 recommendation that will be
presented to Council.
Rowlette agreed with the draft presented by Staff.
(#13)ZONING FILE #1618-WILLIAM PDCEL
BALOUR PARK
SKETCH PLAN REVIEW OP A PRD/SUBDIVISION
William Pucel was present. He stated that he d:.d not
understand why the Planning Commission's views on developing
Baldur Park had changed since the last sketch plan application.
Kelley explained that he had driven out to Baldur Park
several times and each time he sees the area, he becomes more ar.d
more convinced that it should not be developed. He informed Mr.
Pucel that he might consider development, if all Ordinances are
met.
Hanson agreed with Kelley, stating that he would only
consider deviating from a reguirement to meet al. Ordinances if
in doing so, the access road issues could be addressed. Ha
stated that the road is his main concern.
Bellows stated that until the Baldur Park Drive is upgraded
to meet the City's safety standards, she will not consider any
development.
Mr. Pucel felt that the road issue could be addressed.
Bellows invited Mr. Pucel to present a plan that would meet
the safety requirements for the road.
I ll lil**^*- - ‘ «. ..
■'J
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING (RE-CONVENE) HELD MARCH 20, 1991
(#13)ZONING FILE #1618-PUCEL CONTINUED .
only r«:L.e:d"nr.oSJ; -n p“e\"er\irc:s” to
City Council with the filing of a formal subdivision application.
ofadjournment
The Morch 20, 1991, Meeting
Commission, a re-convene .. c i o m
Commission meeting, was adjourned at 5;12 p.m.
the Orono
the March 18, 1991
Planning
Planning
m .* \Jm 1 .
i*';.
I'k. .1"
« Y.
. ?
■s^ :
♦rv^.
:*■ • 1
mmWB
_ .,. , •■'.r r*il
.*.. . -r -
•V. ■ •' ...
I' '■.,
Vv’ •■
WW.1I->v V.
i%S; *'%;v < rl
mm jf^f , : -rsy^:
■•'SS.:
5~aRi
•■=;.■' t '/W-r-:
y?
4Wy % - ^ ' ■
\
j
? •
■I"'
•'i ^^ \-: :
■ *
-?x‘M
#:.:• i*ii«ill«y...!
VV:;*).- ->,
v)r
; ■
.1
i
-t';'
•t;' '• ■•.'■■■'. ■-• '-Vi
►V. •••• ■:m’ilm
V. ■■■yjym
- 8 -
Ki
VjA'y
:’•"' .‘Syakt^
K:W--y
■’ V ■' y'
pjap'w'