The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10-17-1983 Planning Packetr PLANMIHG COMMISSION AGEi?-|)A COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:3§ p.B. MONDAY, OCTOBER 17, 1983 COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - John Hammerel CALL TO ORDER ACTION ITEMS 1. #761 Douglas Smith, 3237 Casco Circle Variance 2. #782 Ole Overboe, 4460 Forest Lake Landing Variance 3. #789 Richard Howell, 965 Edgewood Hills Road Variance 4. #790 George Torkelson, 670 Tonkawa Road Variance 5. #791 Bruce Clark, 1285 Lyman Avenue Variance NORK SESSION 6. #788 Freshwater Foundation, 2500 Shadywood Road Conditional Use Permit - PRD - Rezoning DISCUSSION 7. Discussion of proposed revisions in subdivision regulations. 8. Select Planning Commission member to attend Council meeting of November 14, 1983-. APPROVAL OP MINUTES 9. Approval of Planning Commission minutes of September 19, 1983. ADJOURNMENT AGEHOft P.m. f 1983 ending Is Road ^wood Road zoning division regulations. »nd Council meeting of >f September 19, 1983. ki?'; ' V' I 4Pmi *1 r iiili^' ■;• I • i h i B :i ■ mmmm /7. /f Al. lUlU A€E OF OIRONO '.vv-*' ■fcli — • xrV & m f toy^ %nar «i j • e • • «ii,ii««i r ii«.it f W. Im. ■^vf- .f^ ■K ..'r-' i .-■'■S' mm .1 ! . -r-x 2 S V'- '> •■-tm yi ■>i ■ r?r jr A , ITY of ORONO lost Office Box 66•Crystal Bay. MinnesoUi 55323* Municipal Offices Telephone 473-7357 •V -i 1-,' t ^II \rr- m^k m Conditional Use Permit Subdivision, Preliminary Douglas Smith 3205 East Calhoun Parkway Minneapolis, MN 55408 Date of Notice NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 9-19-83Date of Meeting Votes; 7 For Against Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval; As submitted Approval; Subject to conditions noted Approval: Additional information required before Council meeting Denial: For reasons noted Tabled: Pending receipt of additional information from applicant Tabled: Pending review by others, or further Planning Commission study No action required NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS The Planning Commission voted to table your variance application at your request. Please advise the Building & Zoning Department by October 7, 1983, if you wish to attend the meeting of October 17, 1983 or by November 4, 1983 for the meeting of November 21, 1983._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Planning Commission _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Council _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the __________________________ meeting is __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ; or __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ for the _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ meeting. In all cases, the application must be continued with the submittal of requested information within or the City will consider the application as formally withdrawn. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Administrator. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission Minutes they are available from the Building and Zoning Secretary upon reviev/ and approval by the Planning Commission. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT Applica of the Applica a)Lot Reqi Reqi Exij Varj Var j Lot Reqt Requ Exis Vari Vari List of Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit < Exhibit 1 Exhibit ; Please r< (present secretary Planning If the ap it on to If we are 17, & 18, al Use Permit 3n, Preliminary cil meeting m applicant Commission ible your iq & Zoning 1 of October 17, .pt of ssion Minutes n review TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Lot Area Required Required Existing Variance Variance Planning Commission Members Jeanne A, Mabusth, Zoning Administrator September 13, 1983 #761 - Douglas Smith - 3237 Casco Circle - Variance of'’ihrappUcant'!®‘’“^®‘’ Commission at the request Application - Variance - Lot Area - Lot Width 21,780 sq. 17,424 sq. 16,748 sq. 5,032 sq. 676 sq. ft. (100% Required) ft. (80% Required) ft. or 77% ft. or 23% (100% required) ft. or 3.9% (80% required) Lot Width Required - Required - Existing - Variance - Variance - 100* (100% Required) 80' (80% Required) 55' 45' or 45% (100% Required) 25' or 31% (80% Required) List of Exhibits Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit A B C D E F - Lot Width & Lot Area Study - Tuthill letter - July 19, 1983 - Smith letter - August 2, 1983 - Brouchle letter - August 25, 1983 - Zoning Administrator's letter - August 29, 1983 ■ Zoning Administrator's letter - August 30. 1983 G - Current Survey with Smith Application H - Tuthill Survey dated June 1, 1973 I “ Planning Commission minutes — July 18, 1983 Please review the exchanges in correspondence between Drooert-v (present and past), attorney and the Zoning Administrator^ Mr secretary called to ask that his application rescheduled ^'the Planning Commission agenda, i assume for a recommendation, not^S tabling. “ SSM^^ouS^L application and send 17 "S question of a common ownership of Lots 1617. * 18, spring Park, then I feel additional informatioS iS ' What i struct line b a lot bring proper of sur. proper- If it ; tion ij your cc adequat the LF applies of this the are the the c) the and the hea] to t that conv demo And dire width va. study is If Plann: informat: followinc No a\ Sewez House addit Appli on de mm.IHili mmtm rariance the request irty owners Mr. Smith * s I on the not a tabling. ;ion and send p of Lots 16, s required. ' r» 1 5 4, i* vV.- 1 . ".x J" #761 - Douglas Smith September 13, 1983 Page 2 bring their property into size and ^ rearrangement property but Lot 18 nLer rel^ived^ nn?? available to theer received a unit assessment, only footage charges. “on\”no^®nfct2sa?y te™ull^?!Je%xis2inS o^d' a-^ditional informa- ®=tion, finding clmbi^ld E^tfie fclearly define adequate area or width for Loi- lu 4-« will not provide the LR-IC zoning district Pl^nlL^r ’=*’® standLds of application finding the foilowi^ stLdaI^^®®^°" ^heOf this variance; ^ standards cannot be upheld for approval 4* Ka J3 ,! •___ - the district"in‘’Shilh said^llnd^il^j^atedr^d^^^ “ structures in a^l en “y^;^2t°lf“%:g^L'n?ilrpr%2r?rr?^^ tte ^ppUcan “°^„a As li% ---------- ---- A • _ ^eL?S?"s1?|tyf co^fl^r^^fair"ir! -y -P-ir to the intent of the Zoning Code; ° >^eapect be Lntrary cSnvenilnir?o^2he%pUcanr'^buris^ii ademonstrable hardship or difficulty? alleviate Sidth^va?Lnces°involving^oS^on all lot area and lot study is completed andamlndment"on?dSaLirietlrm?L"“ information av^llble"to%ct *^on ?Pg"^°'’ **’at there is sufficient following findings: application, you may consider the additionfl^VMian^S*"® constructed without the need of oS^i'ee?opS^S?*‘ir^r?r“^ limitations mmmmrn #761 - Dot September Page 3 Or Planniu additional the exist! I would ad lot line r will refus 17. principal shared lot (lat line? is parrangement Lth the surrounding yith the pattern lilable to the mly footage charges. Iditional informa- Jlearly define •11 not provide le standards of t to deny the pheld for approval ^land in question ing property; and structures in 5 preservation i applicant; and ly way impair spect be contrary terve as a leviate rea and lot 1 the City's ufficient / consider the need of i limitations #761 - Douglas Smith September 13, 1983 Page 3 ^ .. . . . . . . . .. cannot make a determination because it lacks . ^ information on Lots 16 & 17, specifically a survey showing L I r r c Ms. J Zonln City Post Crys t I re Smith build 1977. cont r. precei meet 1; Infer* be un' which thing s tralj The 1. separj orlgli separi was t; a mu! recel^ accor< of thi such the i\ af f eel that I all ( nelghi se it lacks urvey showing erty line, you feel a applicant mbined Lots 16 j’J-v' i ■‘ifM n : It 1#- •; •4 r.'-- ■' " % . -Vt M m ¥■■ ■ #■ r *iF- [I?* - • Lire esTATE FLANN lNd OENEHAL INtUMANCe SUAV V 8 ^utt)Ul Jlgeqcy EXHIBSt 1S21 HOPKINS CROSSROAD MINNETONKA. MINNESOTA 55343 (612) 546-6777 July 19, 1983 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 [l©[i0\5^[i • I AUG- i 1963 CITY OF ORQHO Dear Ms. Mabusth I received a telephone call late last week from Douglas H. Smith who you know to be the party who is applying for a building permit on a lot which I sold to him in April of 1977. He was quite upset, apparently having talked to his contractor who represented him at the Council meeting that preceding Monday. While he did not himself attend the meeting, nor did I, he left me with the impression that Inferences where made that I sold him a lot which I knew to be unbulldable. I was greatly disturbed by any statement which would be made suggesting such an act on my part. This thing continues to annoy me and 1 wish to set the record straight. The lot in question. Lot 18, Spring Park Addition was a separately platted lot of record on January 1, 1975. It was originally platted in 1883, I believe. It has always been a separate lot with its own separate tax statement. The lot was titled in my name as a single individual as opposed to a multiple or corporate ownership. While I may not have received a building permit without approval of the Council, according to the zoning code, because it was not within 80Z of the sanctioned width and area size, the code did allow such a use for a single family residence "provided that in the judgment of the Council such use does not adversely affect public health or safety". I believed then as now that a building permit, with proper setbacks, all of those tests, in keeping neighborhood. with the etc. rest meets of the Sincerely, • Richard Tuthlll cc. Douglas H. Smith • :• ” ... .; • August 2 Jeanne V. Zoning P City of P.O. Bo)( Crystal Dear Ms, This le variance pending I will as you what yo As you and ha\ Certain: purchasi continui preparei benefit am asto Please require what im; varianc I am al that th of new to admi fail tc new sta tabling this ye of bei mertito has ini was no Las H. ^or a rll of > his i tbat 1 the 1 that lew to cement . This record 7a s a [t was >een a le lot sd to t have iincll, Ln 80Z allow liat In srsely IS now meets 9f the r- :• MJ6-5BB3 W OF ORONO rvu up IT ; ■ i ' ^ I. 4 c .1 ■munTWi August 2, 1983 Jeanne Mabusth Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.0, Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Ns. Mabusth: pending before the Planning Commission. I will attend the Planning Commission Meeting of August ^5, 1983 as you request, although I do not understand what I can add to what you already know concerning the "common ownership £ “ArVi» ~ bene fitted if I had simply let the lot go to seed and ^ am astonished this was raised by you as an issue at the Please call me to explain first of all, what other facts you require regarding this "common ownership" question and secon , what importance the maintenance of the lot can possibly have to my variance application. I am also in receipt of your notice of July 19, 1983 tOiadminister^^its^^zonjLngn^^^^^ tor a study and KSiSr"'.'. Athis year impossible and I frankly am quite upset at the prospect of being put on hold where I believe my application is mertitorous in all respects. Indeed, my builder, has informed me that you stated at the last meeting that there was no reason the building permit should not be granted except for th facts 1 any fu meritoi August Finally that notwith require violate gross a protect complai Kindly ; early oj Douglas immm 5BB3 iii^ ORONO I to my irrently .5, 1983 add to issue, in 1977 s year, time I thill to s I was «ou Id be frankly hearing, lets you second, ve to my states ishment irtunity s and I udy and of this wilding irospect ;ion is Fohnson, t there except y- % lllts^'eVssry\raddfeil thfiTo"' «>eany further delay, the atmlic^^ ownership business without meritorious in all respects^^and r^frii agree, isAugust 15. *^espects, and I feel entitled to a decision on ihTt^\ ^ projisi'd “hoisf ^"„id*®'"bi" Violates 8etback^‘’?e'qSL"Le^s“*'”V"®sug|ef^"Tha" i^toSfS 1.°“®* 9ross abuse of vour ^ yyesc cnat it would be a protect her ina^Sate Iltback Thr^i"^ application in order to complaint, not hers. * * closeness of the homes is my eir^^^'o^^^tunUy? 1 have raised at your <Verys truly yours, ^ Smith , y •t -' 1 -1' m JEFFREY R. BRA Attorney at Lai August 25, Jeanne Mabi Zoning Adm: City of 0r< Box 66 Crystal Baj RE: Dougla Dear Ms. Ma This firm application had been t< recommendat Mr. Smith : lot this ye Further, Mr intends to likely to b I request regarding t! options, requests fo; Thank you f< Very truly ] Jeffrey R. E JRB:kb cc: Douglas ME i all the 5 without gree, is Dision on omplained o hers, setback >er house lid be a order to les is my at your p... ■ >* *.» •• »; • y'ZSAi: i , pyL?»p|f JEFFREY R. BRAUCHLE Attorney at Law August 25, 1983 ^[j©[inW7fi AU6 29B63 i* Jeanne Mabusth Zoning Administrator City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay MN 55323 £ITY OF QROMH Holmes & Graven CHARTERED 470 Pillsbur>* Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Telephone 612/33M 177 RE: Douglas Smith variance application Dear Ms. Masbuth: retained regarding Mr. Douglas Smith's plainly lost any opportunity to build on the Further® Mr®^ delay in considering his application, intense'I-!! « advised in what manner the city city's legal counsel contact me Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours. Jeffrey R. Brauchle JRB:kb cc: Douglas Smith •Midi I CITY I OF 1 ORONO August 2 Jeffrey ; Holmes & 'lyo Pillj Minneapo! Re; #76; Dear Mr. As I att€ Commissic applicati lots held were esta determini At prese meet 100 single s< Mr. Smit] record r< did not I that the was revec Staff ha for commi until we an ordin« recommen( Please fee myself if the part o Sincerely, (X Jeanne A. j Zoning Adm cc; Dougl< Bruce building a zoning • ASSESSING linnesota 55402 7 nith *s matter 1 your m the ation. i city .on is EXHIBIT ct me ag his o any T I I ORONI^ CITY of ORONO Pont Office Box 66•Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323 •Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka August 29, 1983 Jeffrey R. Brauchle Holmes & Graven '170 Pillsbury Center Minneapolis, MN 55402 Re. #761 Douglas Smith, 3237 Casco Circle - Variance Application Dear Mr. Brauchle: meet^l00%*^of^all^lo? lots held in common ownership to Mr. Smith's application was accepted a^a lot , standards. airn%\-1-L^ anTi!dtT^r.-t IS that the common ownership of T.ot« ifi it a review processwas revealed. I-°ts 16, 17 and 18, Spring Park Addition, an ordinance for a moratoriul ® The^PlInning'^Co^isr'''’®’' than adopt recommendation to table rather than deny the fp^iclwon"” * ^ •Sincerely, Jeanne A. Mabusth Zoning Administrator cc: Douglas Smith Bruce Malkerson, City Attornev .UILDINC a ZONING ASSESSING - 473-7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 i p ^ I CITY : I OF I ORONO August 30, ] Jeffrey R. I Holmes & Gr< 470 Pillsbui Minneapolis, Dear Mr. Br< In review ot Commission ] 1983, I rea: the Plannini The Planning that they c< and how it 1 tabling the to act on tl for formal i before the 1 that he wou! was asked t< meeting by 1 placed on tl Please advi of the Plan the Buildin< permit sche< If we do no with the or if Mr. Smi't Commission September 1 Sincerely, Jeanne A. M< Zoning Admi: Bruce ; ‘i ORONO I 5S323*Municipiil OfYice* plication the Planning ^idth variance ^ involving districts for lership to pposed to le standards, eparate h of Lot 18 rocess ark Addition, variances o wait than adopt ade the arson, or ation on WORKS - 473-?3S9 i; •5' ■^jry •4 f 'i- H t. )■ fe-. ■ -y.. & »t n 1*^£ 'I i c'Tv ; I OF ^RONO CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66 •Crystal Bay. Minnesota 5S323 • Mgnicipul Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka August 30, 1983 Jeffrey R, Brachle Holmes & Graven 470 Pillsbury Center Minneapolis, MN 55402 Dear Mr. Brachle: In review of my letter of August 29, 1983, and of the Planning Commission recommendation for tabeling at their meeting of July lo, 1983, I realized that I have net: presented the complete directive ci the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission asked thv Mr. Smith appear before them so that they could review with your client the common ownership issue and how it has affected this review and to give him the option of tabling the application until the City wide study is completed or to act on the application so that it can be passed on to Council for formal action. In fact, Mr. Smith had advised me the Friday before the Planning Commission meeting of August 15, 1983, that he would attend the meeting but never made an appearance. He was asked to advise me if he planned to attend the August 15, 1983, meeting by Monday, August 8, 1983, so that the application could be placed on the official agenda. Please advise Mr. Smith that if he wishes to attend the next meeting of the Planning Commission on September 19, 1983 that he notify the Building and Zoning Office by Monday, September 12, 1983, to permit scheduling on the official agenda. If we do not hear from your client, we will assume that you agree with the orioinal tabling motion of the Plannina Commission. However, if Mr. Smith cannot attend* the September meeting and you wish the Commission to act on the application, please advise my office by September 12, 1983. Sincerely, Jeanne A. Mabusth Zoning Administrator cc: Bruce Malkerson, City Attorney BUILDING & ZONING - 473-73S7 ASSESSING ADMINISTRATION A FINANCE - 473-73S8 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 ORONO la 55323 •Municipal Offices lanning of July 10, directive of ore them so rship issue ! option of impleted or lo Council ihe Friday 183, iarance. He ist 15, 1983, :ion could be i next meeting he notify , 1983, to t you agree Bsion. However, DU wish the office by UfLIC WORKS - 473-73S9 - o';I. i--- , r :-;SV i 4 i, J Mm ■-■y. 0' CAniDII for Thoms H.».x s:’ 70 VX \' o.. r ••**• *. v> "A"-' *W«sentatlon of a ®***^ct repr«. «0onssZ [ot I'riLf *!!« t\\i f sentatlon nr o '^pre- boundarJe. of L? f the location of sU stVj’^^^ thereon, and the pro no* % ^^'^lidlnga a proposed building. port to show other imnm pur- encroachments. ^“Provements or ^24 COSDON R. COFFIK CO., Inc. Seale: Oite ; 1« = 4o» 6-17-83 Iron marker GordoTT^. Coffin #761 TV.lysssii fA :::i- £7%%K ■*i-.■-* a :.-0:^./ ;t:V^ 3 :-mm ■■.i\ . my -.. 3;K-fl ■ :: ;■:■'.■:*<■<.'i. ' ■ v 71, :.■*:v.^,'.ri:./■ }.:» -■ ■ y.y-y ■ ’ ■K'■'■ ' ' ‘Si •«rV7 _ .: '■'f m ■' V..M ill tfc.v5 " ■ t: m^M 'f W: ^ hi'M W .1 < ••WWMI-1^ WKjiTfll IW Bfffl WCRBHUICD Plat of Svirvey for J. Richard TuthiU of I/)t 18, Sprintj Park Hennepin Coxinty, Minnesota FXHSBIT jfteJ ...*^»‘ \ k®•|S^' ^ V • s X . 0 »\ r>//\ N. Proposf>cf \ house \w i \ ^0 \ \ •**' •• •» ^ X, Ccrtificutc of Survey; I hereby certify that thin iz a true and correct representation of a suj’vey of the ioundaries of bot Ic, Gprini: Park, also all the land, incluiiir.tj the vacMteci lii^jh- uey, Lake Shore Drive, lyin,'; between the KorLlieastcrly line of said lot and the shore of Leke Minnetonka and lx*tween the Korthvesterly and SouLhoasterly line-.; of said Lot 18 extended Northeasterlv to said lake shore, and being part of Governnent lot 6, Section 20 Township 117 Korth, Range 23 ‘•^st of the 3th Princinal * Meridian, and also indicated on the plut of said Spring Park port to show other improvements or encroachments. 1” = 40* 6-1-73 Iron marker Cordon R. Coffin Hec.^o. 6064 Land Surveyor and Planivir Long L»ike, Minnesota • i. *; ? S •<:• •: ■■ .S.w.\ r'.1, t >.• • ..1 wm M m : II :#t^S :fe m :?• i : MINUTES OP ULRICH (CO^ ^^61 DOUGLAS 3237 CASCO C VARIANCE EXHIBIT MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 18, 1983 Page 11 Nabusth stated that she had never been made aware of any other alternatives to muskrat problems from the DNR. She noted that this seawall method was an acceptable method to the DNR. Callahan noted that the Council minutes of July 28, 1980 reflect that there are no other methods for the muskrat problem. Goetten moved to table William Ulrich*s application pending receipt of input from the City Engineer, the DNR's "other methods", and the neighbors. Goetten would like to inspect the other sites in Orono that have seawalls to see if the seawall solved the problem. Also for staff to check out the drainageway. McDonald seconded. Vote: Ayes (4), Nays (1) . Adams minority opinion - Adams noted that he felt that the problem Mr. Ulrich has with the muskrats is very urgent. He noted that Mr. Ulrich has a very well thought out plan eliminating the safety problem he has on his property and to table the application may be creating a safety hazard. Anyone can step into one of the muskrat holes and break a leg or a small child could fall into one of those and drown. Mr. Ulrich stated that he did fill in the holes caused by the muskrats. •Mabusth noted that when she took the application in it appeared to be a simple lot of separate record and it did not meet 30% of the standards. While doing the review she found a problem of common ownership. Two neighbors were present for this application. Jane Remien and Pat Spilseth. The builder was present for Douglas Smith. Sime asked if there wasn't a common ownership problem would staff have any other problems with this application. Mabusth stated that if this was a lot of separate record, staff would still have a problem with this application. Goetten asked the neighbors if they had any comments. Pat Spilseth stated that she would be opposed to this variance application because their lots are so close together and the noise level could be bad. Jane Remien stated that she too would be opposed to the variance application because of the lots being so close together. She stated if the lot isn't right size how can you justify building on it? t - ■ i i 4 V 14 MINUTES SMITH (C #762 THOI 4195 HIGI VARIANCE FHWBBT-y Page 11 »en made aware of Toblems from the method was an utes of July 28, • methods for the ch*s application ty Engineer, the jhbors. Goetten es in Orono that «rall solved the the drainageway. » Nays (1). that he felt that muskrats is very has a very well ty problem he has plication may be I step into one of small child could the holes caused ipplication in it te record and it »ifhile doing the tn ownership. is application. Ider was present ^nership problem lems with this lot of separate oblem with this ad any comments. opposed to this ots are so close be bad. 3e opposed to the i lots being so lot isn’t right n it? SMITH (CONT) #762 THOMAS CORSON 4195 HIGHWOOD ROAD VARIANCE . MIHiJTBS OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 18, 1983. Page 12 "^owne^^M rf ch was advised of the common and that^ currently by the Cityt^he Planning Commission would have to studrtTi Smith's application until that shniii'a K po™Pleted. Habusth advised that Smith with Staf/*an®d" PI °PP°''t“nity to address the issue witn state and Planning Commission. appllcatiot Douglas Smith's variance question and common ownership Adams seconded. Vote: Ayes (5), Nays (0). Bi®' ^.°tson were present. Mabusth reviewed with the Planning Commission Mr. Corson's reauesh oTt setback variance for a detached garage. St wTshet to keep the same setback of the exiitin| garage which it tiLe M ® 24' detached gatage it itt gtttgt? "'’® ^PP“=®"t why he needed such a large «aocbie wttn"tTs'° ® " hobb7shop:° HU=0 its because o^f-tha"t!No plumbing will be installed. twlltttion''®‘^ot° ^PP'^®''® setback variance cttstructttn of a L°"x^ ?4'"'d°e7a°ched'° '='’® the following findings and htrdshipsV'^’® 1. Slope of land to the south of the proposed garage. 2. Location of a mature oak and several small trees. 3. Proposed setback will allow use of existing gravel urnaround and cut down on additional hardcover. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Doors of garage must face away from the street. bttkitrtut o°nto®Hlthwtod"Rtal? ®‘'=® ' Slme seconded. Vote: Ayes (5), Nays (0). FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Zoning Di Area - 12 Applicable Street Se Required Existing Proposed Variance Side Setbc Required - Existing - Proposed ■ Variance - List of E> Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibig G The applic garage on garage. T south. Lot for the gi Lot Area 75-250 a] Allowed 1 Existing Proposed Total hai S3.Page 12 ised of the common rrently by the City )n would have to ration until that Ivised that Smith address the issue n. Smith's variance common ownership please attend the Nays (0). Mabusth reviewed son's request of a *ge. He wishes to ig garage which is fhed garage in its s hardships as the rees. seded such a large e to put a double I hobby shop. His because of that. setback variance to permit the d garage based on ps: proposed garage, iral small trees. f existing gravel ional hardcover. ig conditions: from the street. ' the site - no »ys (0). TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator October 12, 1983 #782 - Ole Overboe - 4460 Forest Lake Landing - Variance Zoning District - LR-IB Area - 12,400 sq. ft. Application - Variances - Street & Side Setbacks Street Setback: Required Existing Proposed Variance 35' 26' l' + 33'± Side Setback: Required Existing Proposed Variance 10' 20' 8' - 2 or 20% List of Exhibits: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibig A - Application B - Plat Map “ Property Owners List - Applicant's site plan - Alternate Plan 1 - Alternate Plan 2 - "As built" C D E F G The applicant requests setback variances to construct a 22' X 22' detached garage on their rental property. The rental property does not contain a garage. The applicant's homestead property is located to the immediate south. Lot 11. The existing structures meet the hardcover allowance for the given lot area as follows: Lot Area - 12,400 sq. ft. 75-250 area - 8,400 sq. ft. Allowed hardcover - 2,100 sq. ft. Existing hardcover - 1,156 sq. ft Proposed hardcover - 484 sq. ft. Total hardcover - 1,640 sq. ft. (house & walk - 890; deck - 256 sq. ft.) fM- 'f .^f 4 .-iM 1$ t r u-' •’S' #782 - Octobe Page 2 The ad the mo The di of the noted, curren setbac] 31.370: Althoui not ce; right < sewer < locati( in the to rec( window I have Alterna Variano Street Require! Existin< Proposes Variance Negative Setback road. Alternat Variance a) Side Requ Exis Prop Vari b) Stre Requ Exis Prop Vari In your . ig - Variance ' X 22* detached not contain a the immediate a 1 lowance eck - 256 sq. ft.) I m v:fH ■ i M-#f 4 ’i!: f :#1 ii ■ - i- r.:-.-, - Mi' #782 - Ole Overboe October 12, 1983 Page 2 The addition of a garage and a driveway, (150 sq. ft to 200 so ft at ThI S?ffxcuufwit^?iis"f T""! requl;e'^hardcovef^;alLnc^of application is to make the most effective use *='’® placement of the garage. As the at.olicant^« noted the travelled road is 36 feet from Itrle^proLrS tine ?L setback line°®10 feef^f® detached garage located 1+ feet^from street Although road is located 36 feet from street property•line survev does not certify this fact, staff must deal with the reality of thI IxiLinr southern portion of the right of way. The stub ■ir. proposed hookup to house prohibits locating the structure in the eastern portion of the front yard. Staff had originally honed to recommend attaching garage to front/street side of house so that^ window on west side could be saved. ^ I have sketched two alternatives for applicant to consider. Alternate 1 - Exhibit E - attached garage Variances required Street setback: Required - 35' Existing - 26' Proposed - 12' Variance - 23' or 66% this proposal is that the window on west side is lost setback to street is 12- from right of way and 30t fee? Trol ??f?ei!ed Alternate 2 - Exhibit F - Detached garage Variances required a) Side setback ~ west side yard Required - 10' Existing - 20'+ Proposed - 5' Variance - 5' or 50% Street setback Required - 35' Existing - 26' Proposed - 6' Variance - 29' or 83% In your approving recommendation, the following hardship may be cited fr t ^ .e H r ■ -k:;. ^ 111 ; ■ #782 - c October Page 3 1• Loca 2. Subs for 3. Loca* The foll< 1. There 2. The h 3. Trave be lo 4. The p on su 5. The p; will ] streei A conditi( setback Vc the allowe hardcover If Plannir Section 32 o 200 sq. ft. at rdcover variance, t effective use he applicant has ty 1 ine. The t from street ired per ordinance line, survey does of the existing Dth road and Df way. The stub 3 the structure riginally hoped Duse so that ier. west side is lost, from travelled may be cited: •;r. m I - s-sf f- ■[ m r-' L--; ••4.. I m ^782 - ole Overboe October 12, 1983 Page 3 1. Location of house on lot 2. Substandard width 55' f>vi for 140* of width ^ ” zoning district standards asks 3. Location of private sewer line in east portion of front yard The following findings may be considered: 1. There is no additional land available 2, The house has existed for 15+ years be located^Ot ?eft“^^m sJ“lt7fron2 proper?y\?L”of on surrounding"*properties^* consistent with recent improvements street traffic hazards on this residential, dead-end setback^va?iaLls‘’for*thit^pTOpe^ty.*'’'Thf'‘*'^ consider no future the allowed hardcover at 1,640 sq ft wlth'^asn^*^^ with garage is under hardcover, available for future development ^'^'^itional Section 32?34oTor®ieceSMy'^findings? application, refer to r ndards asks 5nt yard ly appears to •f Lot 10 provements e structure idential, dead-end c no future arage is under P additional refer to -i I I mm K < K mi MW / / / i. [I ..V 1L4-."Vv—\rV'“^wD£vetop€iH \ IZ<5m ifo • W 0> fO \*| —• V <5^ no 1^0 40 mr ^ * •A\ 1 •t [S’*©; 7;^ L. . . '►J r\ / ' i-fe-k • ^ I ^ , \r; --T - * . .. X L ^, I *». i^tibwg .spp -^ I9R3 ‘ t'l M I /fZ'. 'r'.>5-A' •'. ^.' 4‘ >; f*' .* ♦ ‘TV' j. /V .V > -J___V ^ v-.nXC*>‘ 1 -f I - •r- • ' I •- • V ¥ mi rj ra** "il-';. ll.^ CO Z CO CM g «• lO X Uu U. M tt Ui si CM 0 U. 11.• ^ lU 4j K M M M lAl ■H 3 CO CO IL >-rC 0 H J >• >-q: k N 00 CL lii 0 0 < <a CO tt D: >- 0 0 0 CDs lA •J >2i- 4 f *• 1 ;:CM 4 1 (24 *>s Uo s 4« >af i 1 4#jL »5 iL % ^4o I c>. 1 f-1.: _ * I r-S££ t I «,• \-r* ^/2j-a »» . cP >1 ^ UJ <r>-4 t m — Vf\ 200 # 5o t S; i-V •**200 IM » fSl ■US' ♦ i 4 ti ) ft J- ' i'-' •' >. >' • hJ • V . •" E I ft Z K o lii «s CO •H li. CD lU V I * S EN o u. O O *> «i9. < O <r «i ftS ^ ^ uj ^m O CD 19 ^ Ki X li. li. CO inM o u. u. ft in I ^ lij ui 5 N M M M X M Z CO 10 O I V >• 1^o o < < CO ft ft O o CD CO CO CO IH O to O 3 Z rC ui O ft CO H5 z >- CO I&. K CD UJ 8zS£ >- li. ft ft Q UI in z c ^ 2 0^0 ft ft 4* c UI ftft r o O < ft o O Z UI < < >- \ ft < Ui CL uj a c O Z X < ft 5 < z ft O H rC ft O ft Z I UI CD O Z > ft u. O O o UI om > o z _ ^ UI o in 35 ^ j ^ on o o o ^ z ft UI CO rH U. Ui ^ UI ^ > Ui ft ZI O Z o zu.o o z «e Qo o z ^ UI in 5 CO ^ *1^0in o o o ^ z §iSi•J u. o Cl CO •H lu CD -i UI r-l Z < DT J M Z O O U. MO Q UI in Zft >• N 5 < ^ o CD ft ^ Z §M §^ 2 M M 8 < M S-* 8 <►3 90 O UI <O UI <O UI mJ o Z -i < o z < ^ -1 -J UI ^^ -J UJ ^ -1CM ^ <z o CM Z CM h* H*< 90 K -J <to Hin CO UI -J in to CO < -J in tn CO CM Ui in CM UI h- >-in CM UI 1 ft M K l ft UJ UI h-I fto O co h*. O CO h* oM U. CO UI UI M lU CO ft UJ r-l U. 10 UI CO ftUI S ft M ft CD “8 S3 -I Z UI > UI M I •c UJ CO M ^ > sss U UI ^z o < < m ft -I in lu in H «i CO UI“85 g ‘o CO o z Q CO O 5 ^ ft ^ o 8M 8 CO -I m O UI CD CO Z ui M Z O M Z ft < < CD ^ ft UJ ^^ 2 >* Ui UJ ^< ^ ^ Z UI ^'O CM Ui Z ^CM -1 Z M>CM Z >- Z ^Kl K > < m h- -J ft < tn H o -1 < ininm CO UJ o -J in in CO <D -J in m CO CO UI -1 ininCM UI o in CM Ui M X in CM Ui z > in1 ft CD Z H 1 ft UJ h-1 ft X UI H O o § oo o (Xo 1 &oo g V- 1. M M UIft r^ ao z < ^ aCL Ui O ? ft S ft o ft o ft o UI < >• \ < UJ ft Z X a< zH lil ft Z O O < ft o O z UI < < >• \ ft < Ui ft UI CL z O Z X <ft < z CL O H J J J 0 ij »’i »« •i. *t 7 w :tj «««c. ^•4 c*•t 4oo ^ C'r. lT7 r—4 cc o f. •M m. r « r> G ••*' «.• »-4 «g.. c» o • ^.s • « o- :r o ■PW"*'" ••• •:i CJ*• •r.aa' c;»•C .:o ^ oc* ^ O if -*• O ? • o n^ ccO f . ^ - •r-l o n c* i5 f-4 3 O•o CO t:Q> t:c •r< :c: • *. »a .*>C5 rj • ^ • « •h to A• *% T>Iw o CO "s.%1^53 m • •* »f ♦ • • • • ••• • f ■•.■ *' H.' .•-" .' ■•'.'• J ./ I 57».^ S /t^ )’. ’ A.r !:^TSS ■f-') *1 mm mi •J2 *: v; aV a. :• •:2 G Ca*•H *’•• r. fy G •;• • • #• ••• - 9 1.:d f.* ..Uc*•• • O >o 0>-P o in r-|cC o f • u •r^ O ^ f •% ^ «• • >•-4 u C.a o r-» ^1* o Q w: • 2 :: CI o CJ •0^4^ .r.o 1 44 c •••1 c •%•:.i o i:.o hZ r.c»;r •t •5. m ha •a •-1 |4 ••• ■*a.? Va 1‘•a? i:4 i:• • a-##;• c*« *•t*• • ;• «. -1 rc o >*^l o u r-l •}r>. V • -•#•• • • • c •a.1 •• ••m •o • •» •1 • 0 H # •• % .•• *%i-4^•'r:i!r:•• ••a:^.*#• % #»•w J i.c*;f/a •H c.»o »• • .A*'*c-VC:.;i u a? * *c • • Km c»#• %a or-•C r-«• • • «• •V. mm •-t • • • •-1 o - ; ' C fj .*• Q'5 ..-j .1 o V’ "<c.^ • r t ••--••• • • • • ••♦ • .a • • • • ••# • » ** F c V: !■ :’• *. a ’• • m • V **.i* • */ ‘' *• . • *:. .*•* • * ** •. '•'- -•'. '■ vV.-'' V'.a-'' r .;•..! • ^25 . •- • •- .. , ■ .. • •• • ..\ •. . .*• ••.•*' ■=. ■-• iV-.-.'./ ••..>• :^'.’ -.- ■'* *■ — :*. ' V* . ‘ V.; .*» .* I*:: ^; ■ • • • - 5> - f *•' • _• «• • * • 'V:--- • '.;■ .• K • - •at. . - a- a. — 2Z \ y** ; •' T-'iC]^^iP-C-rCr'-r v'. . -r;:5. C i' ^ ♦ f-< Ti n c K i: c 0) I; • r. V, ;. .r4 O T« ’ V. i: c:.s <5ir^ o 4' <r % z i o (X iGZD CO o 1 LU o. t cy. ruiv‘ •V i, ^iS.N •: '. ^ 1 WW I I IW f 1 i.r%^ r / • • /• - • ».* If SkS^I »*,*• '« ••P^W • y' *••. • • .. • ,•?••..* , *-r , *•• '• *.. ’•*.*’ • .'V* * •" ‘* H V f’': • • ^ • OUT b^ ' • : ■•.• •:. -.-v-v.,-. ’ 8*'0R'-• • • ;• ^.» ' .. :•;• V s- V. ‘T’ * * • • • . * * • X ' . I —^—— - - ’ __;■ %* **■ I -^1 .-•* \ Jt ‘ ■ • . . • ...................................................... ■ \7 I O I ■'• • > 1 « 5« Q*. •7 •. ■ :*;• .,v T. ."r ' .-: i-.::'::;^::;..;24 •• - ‘ • • • '•> ..••• « ^ • •.•« •. V >r.-.-^.••••.■.. V.*. -:? V • • ' * ■ * . • 1“ * • *‘ . ■••• ' ■F m • • •1*7:*-s V t •.; .•• •■ , • v.; ,*. - .,rv^ .... ./„ ' v . ••;..■.■.• • . • • • •. -.•••/ •••.- ^ .- • : 'vrv;.". ^ 7 ».••* .• ■ •4 •* . .*• • .* ■*••# * ^ • • •/ *. .*•/*,^_______ ____ •# / . • ^ v^* */ * • •» • ♦ * • • * .'^v;,.:v'H •■.*;»■ ; V ,.vJ| ■■ • • • „ •■■■.-••♦ • 23 • ♦. • .*» •> # . . •. • . ••* ••• :i'=- • .I** .•« s >.• * «• ^ :tJRCfP •• 0 . *4. * ... V ^ • /• • > : .1 '•.7 : 1 A f .yf: f. ^ ^ -i.vi ? .. •'■ • ’ Vifej %. ••• - ♦ ■ ■ rf.'. • • -,•*••. r .*.• ■ .» *•*.•'* • • i.••••'*. ’ i-r*. ^.-^;;• :?i:^>.;•>v;:v; . '. • • •',. 1 ■ ^•■- ■ • - 2 ? * • •• •••.-. d » *• *.. *• . •. L ■ ‘ • ,h [•V?v:* ••• ••./• •• .V % •16.4 12’C ; • • *‘ * * ■’• *l K-- '. V;••*■.. 'ft' *:•■* :•. 0^53 19* L eW ^. : F#V 'I • ■' ’i } ■ ■• :■• - s =• •.••-•*. •. ; • •• :•• : • : •: 'r1. •• * * 7 ‘"i- %. ■. ^ ' ■ *. • • • . . . • • . /; :\;A-:>-/v —.1 •■•.•...■-.v .■■■■.it:- r •••* 1 J »•»• .• • — •7 io.3 «• •• •••.* .• I» •■ % •. • *< / ..•••/ » . •'-1 ■•* W^R• • • • -••• * • r -7 . .••V : MO. * *..4 . • .V * • ' ’ *• V 0 .**•I •: ,5t.« V- ^ • 4. ^ ,.€ 0+92 •. •. _ •• . . ii■ -41.* • • ' • —I? '•**. sa* ■:- V‘*> ■-^ •' •• o'i\P r .A y «.• ■; -• I ■f ;•.r > • •< .w-: •* • • • •• v‘•• *.: ' •/! n.. I . . /1 \' 480* .*» • •t .->••• - •• ..v.» >■ *> 'HO. ^•■ ,.,; IV - ♦ • ♦ . • ♦ - V V-••.1* r • .•.T - !v I A» *•'**. • » • ;• \ V. • i* • ' . • ••• •; . ,* V * *.*’•'■* •"*•. ..•wA»***’ I ■*• ••'.> *v •• ••; .•• /• • •is2 •. . *•.:v>- 13'OR. • I «.9 10 • ‘ ■;:rm • A • .i-.' •.T. . A*. ^ -r. • « .* #•. y V? . V ^•m \ • .* i ••1 ••>*.* '. 2< ELM • • • . •H38 4 *.. '. “...H •••%.. ■,*■. 4 r :-^'irf;btP• i‘/" V--: V*’-■■■•• 77 '. .■•: • ‘ ■ •' W--r.v.v?? r. • -.-.v- V'-' • 9 A . ’ r /'• 4\’L ‘.v/v / '* j iV.• •••!V-*-k cervice (^J® iiJf'oR % « ^'V • • •* • .‘r' J.-l •; L4bl.j * ». 'Z »\ 'Sy •.\% .*. i» • I , .' •; ..-/i * ^ .* • • •• •■)'• • ^ • • • > • -'- x . *•; . • .'V / • •. • ji • .*.> • V : ;V‘ «.. V *-**.*.*.kw. < :.4 V :V I*V •’iA. .* « • ' . • •• t 4 i, CiV?:.';-' ‘/V*** .*.• « ♦ .'' 'P’X 1 'Ai Zoning Dis Area - app. Applicatio] a)Lot ar< Require Existii Varianc Street/ Require Propose Propose Varianc Varianc List of E3 Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F The Howell Edgewood H district - severe, st< on the wesi more gradu« is able to drainfieldj west as poj The devel the surrc and lot VI not requi house is SWKR ft Jp\.969.35 " , •• >* ■jSvv •• V .\.- r'V V"• ;; Aj-i • * • I • • •*.. *• • • *•. ' • ,.;-9 S'* . • • *.'•. . • • i.' • »• .=■■ : . . T-.'-' H/X ■ X'. • • " . ' .\ZUew * ^ ■. ’ ; ztog:. * >‘V \0 *. .» •' X \. CWt© <Sf ." ‘V •<*'” *• •••*■ ^‘ . ^ ‘. .* %• ** • • •. • C ■■ »••• ^ ,••• :•'-•••' •..••: 3«t Ot 92 0 »0L .'•i to' *» . •\ - *#. •< • .1 V. V; VV.W.' •'. •• * t *•? *;- -V-. -r.'-sr« • • .* .*> '.» «O- r5 •f. / 4«3 ..< r' .•'. ^. i ■•• V- ^•;r - r r »• % ;'i \0 V ^ «.*• Vv«^' •-. .•'•V ^ < •> •;>• ’f/*' *: •-I 9^ # •*••*r A * V! > •• ‘■ V* I •V .^**» <*'9 •* * . . •. • *. ... • , ; ♦ .. . . •• -s *•% •"•/I * . • * - . ’ * •',% . ..• ^ ' *♦*%•, . ^ * *• ‘.^. ' •• •/ - .•/ '•* • '..4 . ‘ ' ’■• *• ...•■Cy . . ■; •. *• . . •• ■ • ■»: •^ •. * i '• • ■ if •.'.v ."■ ■ .1 l" Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator ■%. •..« • October 13, 1983 1789 - Richard Howell - 965 Edgewood Hills Road -Variance Zoning District - RR-lB Area - approximately 1.5 acres Application - variances Lot area variance Required - 2 acres or 87,120 sq. ft. Existing - 1.5 acres or 65,340 sq. ft. Variance - 0.5 acre or 21,780 sq. ft. or 25% Street/front setback Required - 50 * Proposed from lot line - 30' Proposed from road easement - 27' Variance lot line - 20' or 40% Variance road easement - 23' or 46% List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Site Plan Exhibit E - Contour Map Exhibit F - Septic Report The Howells require variances to construct a new residence in Edgewood Hills neighborhood. The lot is located in the ^-IB zon<n„ * house IS to be built according to rural standards? >^®<J"ired if a ■X- ' "■<- L vV, ..-LTW': ^ ■ |•\ , . . , _ __ #789 - Ri October 1 Page 2 Access to of that e< easement i The actual subject p] If Plannir of Richarc 2. Only c buildj The follov 1. The pr of lot 2. The pr nor be 3. The pr and on Approval s 1. Prior septic B Road - Variance ce in the RR-lB zoning rhe lot has been placed age of the St, the applicant able for on-site le house as far consistent with ^ed a lot area property does squired if a ■St' ■'r' 4 ? ■ k r I-'. . . . Tr #789 - Richard Howell October 13, 1983 Page 2 Access to the property is via a private easement 50' in width. A portion of that easement extends SO' into Tract B - see survey on site plan...The easement runs a width of 25' for 50' along the north property line The actual turnaround is located in front of Tract C and will serve the subject property. If Planning Commission recommends approval of the variance application of Richard Howell, the following hardships can be cited: 1. Severe slopes on east portion of lot restrict building envelope 2. Only area available for on-site septic systems intersects the building envelope The following findings may be considered: 1. The proposed development of Tract B is consistent with development of lots within surrounding neighborhood 2. The proposed development of Tract B will create no traffic hazards nor be detrimental to the public health, welfare and safety 3. The proposed development of Tract B is consistent with the rural and on-site septic standards of the City. Approval subject to the following conditions; 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant must submit septic design and final site grading plan 2. No futher setback variances shall be granted for this property inm *4 Ma • IIIo o Kl ? CM N iy K» X V8 I CM o in CM to CO o to o Hi <0 ►- oiSf t- m Mge o o> flO UJ o S «• a ^ M CO •• X •I o lU X o < H HI P K tt O ^ ^ < K N 10 Hi O >• 3 CM < -> -> to a to CM I !5 ^ H CO *4 S-'SSID HI o in «g““‘ •i QC -J •4 CO CM HI______ H Hi O H a O 3 < < q: n CD Hi o V _ 3 CM < 3 3 to 3 § Q QC S M to X CM Cl P^ 2 >• uQC a tom I CM o o o CM CO C9 to O 8S-I U U M J-.5 -i _i 5 < M M p P R X <( S Q N S 9 ® >- 9 9 o < 3 U CM X W QC is§q; o 3 >. a “^ o Sot-: \lu o tt to -I o u 0 M ox ^ *3 S to^8 S CM £3 ^ ^ 1 O M M ^ o Hi Hj cr z ^ HI X X CM s1 oin<<S< 2 a a M O HI HI O V<0 *4 IK < to O Ul lu OL 3 tt (0 (0 Ma -J < Hi HI CO O I CO “ o CO a^ Hi M l-t ^ a j c^ fO S o a S Ch to inm 5 o < O K9 3 o O .1 o M o X ^ O •-4 O K.S CM HI N O ^ HI 1 CM o in CO Ch CO O to o X ft <0. 9 9 u < o o •uig rj y K CD O (0 K ^O *4 X X O VI s§ O 3 K Q 52 ju ^ 0.225^ 0x522 N O u t- <o t-o ino o O o ft CM «J sr -I M to X CM Q o 3HI ^ ■5 CD ID p m ft ft in *• ft CO «i < ^ I CM o lu X I- Hi m ft 10 CM 4l a to CD Hi CO O ~5 to O -> -) Hi ft CSS a2S! a o H o < St; CM < to 3 © -:.L O r— cvj Q_ UlJ CO O CXo O S HI HI fO r o M WTT ___ V C.rfrp 0) • • ■; •v^-'-m 1^-' Certi f iru t».* oT Survey for Kirh»,r(; L. Kovell o. Tract R, RenioUTr-ii lf.n>i Survey Ko. 109c Hei.!:0!'in Cour.ly, Kirinenota v m , 'M'(55^ •TLM. J h.. r;;y c-rliiy t’.;.t ti.ii: 1. i. .c -.r. re vr* ct rcprese-r.to.tior o.' h o5 t-rifr r-ruru-.riMf of Tract B, H .:.-y -uc --.r,.- Spcvt-y :.o. 109?, files of the H' j tr r of Csiurty of KerjieoJr, • cnc the iO 'j'j 'J o'* fell {'.?«•:<.— J. ..•ixi. . ... .3 , 1 ary, tnereon, !.:.r t.,? p:c):>oi.ec ioratisn of a propcstd builci.nt:. It cry-.-: r.cl ;n.r:v;rt to sno’- oth'-r i.r:-)rove.vjnts cr cncroach- ..■> * mam ' .--sf mm ms tK ik y^m: J 1£i T J 'SLO p i £ /rv. . S/T£ A/U T T~7 fill «’• j ' ** •m gt:hrtM- K V the cnc the ry, thereon, ilcir.t;. It :r encroach- "V*'*'******'* » ‘ I ■ @[iOWfi"iT5.. . . . .. I ^ mmm a!_;». ■ V , -liLvY'' '■ -"^ ISmmmmm ;ii 4 TO:Jeanne A. Mabusth FROM:Michael p. Gaffron DATE:October 12, 1983 SUBJECT: Dick Howell - Variance Tract B, R.L.S. 1098 - Septic System Review approximately KS^^acres with^no citv*'°™^ existing lot of in addition, he is askinrior . ^®ter available. construction of the hous4 near thrwLrside^orthriL^'' presumablv du^» <-r> __ _ _ _ wesu siae of the lotpresumably due to the extr^ml siae of the lot on the drainfield sites. keep from encroaching th^on^shown oS'^thrsUe lvarL?ion"r®^^"^ Proposal than longer, narrow conflgu^atiortou^^Jikelv^the drainfield sites. ikely encroach much less on nat^are^Luvay^stllp*'slopes “''%arrol ‘*tS " “ from the perc telt results, comfaction^in^th?®*'?'" Howevera problem. Adequate area ar»r»«.aSe ion in this location was not on both primary and alternate sites° suitable for trenches note that runoff diversion will Ko * site evaluator did from excess surface water necessary to protect the sites application? ^Approval°Sf^theront s ,®PProval of the he necessary so as not to on u aathack variance appears to applicant should be ?^fo?mirthat an"s’^t® drainfield a?Ls. ihe final site gradinrolanl m.?ft hf J design andbuilding permits? ^ submitted prior to issuance of >■<( i! •i M wm^ ' , 5%' . i '•i' ' . •• miwm TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJEC Zoninc Area - The ap the pr princi is pla aesthe consis proper the wi The To longer all ac inside curren m-r t of ble. allow caching than $s on atively has th However, not nches d sites the s to The [id a of I TO:Plannina Commission FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE;October 12, 1983 SUBJECT: #790 George L. Torkelson, 670 Tonkawa Road - Variance (hardcover + setback) Zoning District - LR-IB Area - 18,795 sf a) Hardcover Review 75'-250' area = 8,925 sf allowed hardcover = 2,231 sf existing hardcover = 2,678*sf (does not include accessory sheds) proposed hardcover = 2,626 sf existing variance = 447 sf or 5% proposed variance - 395 sf or 4.4% ♦house = 1,002 sf drive = 1,000 sf parking area = 676 sf b)Side Setback required = 10* proposed = 6 * variance = 4* or 40% The applicant seeks variances to construct a detached garage 26* x 24' in the street yard of the lakeshore property. As required the proposal shows the accessory structure placed 10 feet from principal structure. The side setback is asked so that the garage is placed to one side of the rear yard for viewjprotection and aesthetic reasons. The proposed side setback would appear consistent with setback of other detached garages on neighboring properties. The lots are all substandard in width in review of the width standard of 140 feet for the LR-IB district. The Torkelsons plan to resod the entire parking area that will no longer be in use once the garage is installed. They will remove all accessory sheds as the proposed garage will also serve as inside storage area. Hardcover excess will be trimmed down with current improvement proposal. #790 Tc 670 Tor Varianc Page 2 The har Plannin detache* between conside: for loc< If Planr setback be sited 1. Ar ov Th CO pr. wmss If applii excess ri improvemc by a futi If Plannj Section 3 Variance le accessory e 26 rom garage and >ring / of It will no Ll remove :ve as lown with TV Wv #790 Torkelson 670 Tonkawa Road Variance Page 2 Planning Commission may airfp^dicant to ^^ive.detached garage closer^to consider relocating between house’Snd glrLfstructulf arel consideration. Ap^u:i®t"SSSw"LlsL^''if for locating garage at minimum required distanclfrom hoSIe!°" sltbacrva?ifn^^lor°Se?aoS»r® application for a side be Sited as a hardship. The f??Io2tnf bl'^Sn^Lred over®30*’yelrs‘^withourrga?age?^^*'®‘^ 2. No additional land available. 3. The proposed side setback for detached aaratr^a ie improvements involving additions to hard**^ bbat futureby a future Council. to hardcover may not be approved If Planning Commission denie* nr-r»rk/-ke»ai i Section 32.340 for necessary^fi^din|s!' ^ PROPERTY ADD Lcg«l description • APPLICANT H.. 3. OWNER H«ai€ Mailing Ad • Date Property I (4^ (do n< 4. AGENT "•««_ _ .**lcase first (Type or Prlr describe yout Mall If t Mailing Addt 5 m NOTICES Should b< 6. ^RESENT ZONINl / 7. y PRES ENT USE Rt Vacant Land 8.^,/ DESCRIBE REQUI __ establish na 3rive . seating in area It a reason house. I side ■dth may ) considered: 3 hardcover lat future ie approved mi LAND USE PLANNING ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 473-7357 EXHIBIT 1 in 1 STOUCTIOMS. J'”*' ^ ” d...rlk. .ppllc.tlon. will LIST OF EXHIBITS PROPERTY ADDRESS {pOO /^n-kaUidj, l2j . Leg-1 deeerlptlon ehell be ehown on attired Survey. Exhibit 3 applicant Ha«e /Wphn,.. 973^ Mailing Address 0^*7^ •_ _ _ _ _ If Applicant la not owner explain - PeacrlD^iofi Application wuat Include: _i^*^Appllcatlon Fom Property (X«nera List Certificate of Survey Pee Receipt OWNER Nsne Date Received 9 ** A By Mailing Address Date Property Acquired JIl.1 ^ (do not) also own oth' AGENT "•"« i ^ ^ ^ (Month/Yesr) adjacent parcels of land Phone Firm Mailing Address 3 • NOTXCES Should be sent to: Staff formi t ion ^ Plat Map 5 Inventory ^ .- Staff Conments Other Information ^ Applicant _ Owner Agent 6. ^RESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT 7. ^/PRESENT USE Residential (Other) Vacant Land Vacant Bulldlng(a) 8.^/ DESCRIBE REQUEST Occupied Bulldlng(s)in OF ORnun estimated CONSTRUCTION COST $ _ eatabllah ne« u.e _ continue or expand existing use . --------------------- - - -dd on __ remodel r.pl.e. mdl.--^--------------^_ .-s WBaw^' i lU c a 3- c o < cx c O uC lu 4 ^ o: *• to ^ a lU I 8Q.UJoc iU t- 10 M •- g (OM CO KUJ tt O IU CL >» O Hss >• o£ zM a UJ to CO N.to CM N. IU CMo u CD toto lAto 10 10 to ^2!^ N o H* to U! S o ^ ^ o o o ttQ. Q. Z M M < 2 UJ IU 3 -i -i < IU IU IU CO S5S o o o ^ ^ lOo o toto o < q: h to CM I < QCM < OC Z O Mo <c < o3 < 10to 103 ^o 3*< IU SoSS lo z: c sO oc Hi CO O IU ft to o u. u. iHo H O Z lo o -Q «J O CO oo IU > < to to o CK CM• 3 o t- •< < -I I 10O 10 CO o to o O UJ < IU ft -t CO CL McIU IU •- -ia UJ z X IU H t- XOCO ftUJ 10 X oIU ^ lO •• 10 H CO t-sf CO CM -J ft 3 C IU ft sr o < o X ^ ft a IU OS*g ft o ft oIU < >- \ < IU J5^ f t to to 2:i ^ ►- 10to to 10 IU o Z UI < o 3 u> CO o to o IU_ _ CD < < UJ < X M _ H •• X ^ Z 5 CO O n •> J to*^ *? 3 ft U. to < UJ CM M -i IU a|sJ5 I u. 10 ft O O IU IU CO Z <o >- -J <0 O ^ Ul »0 Q 3 X 10to lO lO lo IU to *"3 o ft o U o* oo o a to “ to -< i5IU o oCO CO -o lOto lO 10 to < CM X N o lU IU Q X X ft P o IU UJ o □ CO a H 10o o ^ 'OCO o_ __ _ _ to o 19 19 M> ^ ggo§ IU IU o IU ft ft r o o < ft gO Z IU < < ^ ft CL IU O Z ft:: a o £\IU §5 III.. N o o o CO X O M H ftU O >- UJ< u. t* CO IU o ^ IU U u►- < CD g °z__ M «C O &X M UJ M IU CO UJ ft IU _ IU ft H _ U CL IU ti. U. M ft O O X V o0 o to ^ ^ to <C -J ^ 3C < to < o M X Z1 Z M h* O -J ^ H OlOto lO lO < ozM I lOo O Q < 3 < Ot- "*0 __ P o o O to O o o po ft X O < ft o ft a g z UJ < < >- \ ft < IU CL IU CL Z « ^ ft 1< < CL O K X < 1: ip:mm isi ; \i\ iX«'-r m m * ' !V ;. <■ 'i^i:m?m rV-/V-V>;V; Plat of Survey for George Torkelson of the NW% of Lot 4, Partens Point First Division >; : ": Lo. f f wykr hm.1r-.v 1- • m STUBBS BAY ” UH£ MIHN£70UKA ’• •/ ' . «r■1: \ *. Certificate of Survey: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the Northwest half of Lot-4, Partens Point‘First’Division and of the location of all buildings thereon, and all visible encroach mentSi: if :any> ’fromlor on said land. % : i 0 ti © m P.ITY OF OrtONO Wm. S. Kelley, Jr. Bruce R. Kelley Reg./>T6. 1342 Reg. No. 5713 1” « 50* 10-14-65 Iron marker KELLEY & KELLEY, INC. Engineers & Surveyors Long Lake, Minnesota . . H ' ^ • • • •• - * "* •“ . • r ” ii Zoning Dis Area - Tot Dry Wet Applicatioi Requests Existinc Variance The appli won by th( on Lyman . vacated Cl the lot ij do not re< standard ] The propert heavy clay, rates. The and a septi< Access to An access Based on t access be at that si be at eith Staff see: that will in approv: design inj property. Gaffron re time of ye action unt septic sit level of e ^vision STUBBS BAY " LAKE MIUNETOKKA i ■ * /*• •• ch- teg.^. 1342 leg. No. S713 I 'f4: •:*■•' v; .%■ ! r 1 T’t ■ Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator October 13, 1983 #791 - Bruce & Terry Clark - 1285 Lyman Avenue -Variance Zoning District - RR-lB Area - Total Area - 3.51 acres Dry Buildable — 1.86 acres Wetlands - 1.65 acres Application - Requested Existing - Variance ~ Lot area variance - 2 acres dry buildable 1*86 acres 0.14 acre won by the young couple on a TV game^show ^ Th*^° "dreamhouse on Lyman Avenue, Lotrla 2 44 inc?udin^^;. have chosen a site vacated Charles street. ^^10? Is corridor of recently the lot is inundatel with an lllenlill^Ln^^f do not receive an area credit for ritrai' °°"higuous wetlands. Wetlands standard requires tw^alrlf^of d^y buUd^bJI^ Properties. The rural heav^cla^!^ ^e^septic tesfreno‘1? “"1= "«heup is rates. The septic report is incomnlA^°”° Percolation and a septic design to treat efflul^^laLT^^^^fL^elr^^^^U^^ level "ftlLll !o:a?KL^L\%V^^™e“ r"h “l -orlnl^rtl^ ^ at that side of the lot is morl aradSfi^®»^°’^- the land be at either corner of tiJI Tirbl^^f%^e° Sa“wn!%a?islf a!? RS-lr"soning Itindards'’°"ILfrf ^°"h°" Propertyin approving the lot area variance^in <-ho 5°®® ^^^e problems prlp'l?ty?^°™"“°" ®°"^trm the rur^j"^ """ It^Tf ylar"^?‘^lsks"th:?^trLS?l - consideration of the action until s^affhls confirmed^uUabirarf ==heduled for CouncS! septic site and is in receipt of an approved and alternatelevel of effluent . ^ approved septic design to treat proposed #791 - Br October 1 Page 2 Recommend to approv' to permit following 1.There to th# and t( 2.Setbac withii 3.The cc be det Approval j Applicant design for Council ac ue - Variance r "dreamhouse”, n a site f recently t half of • Wetlands The rural s makeup is ercolation 1 testing home use level. right of way. cs Department, t that the >f the land i should 1 Avenue. on the property lave problems :e testing and le rural ition of the for Council and alternate o treat proposed <4 >• 4>. i j >• i ... j ■ #791 - Bruce & Terry Clark October 13, 1983 Page 2 Recommendation: tQ approve a lot area variance application of Bruce and Terrv ClarkKissss »' • S"i:. 1.to Lo? additional land available to combine with subject property • ® single family residence, to the south more wetlands and to the east, Woodhill Country club werianas 2.Setbacks of the RR-IB zoning district can be easily satisfied within the defined building envelope s>dtxsriea residence on the property will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare Approval is based on the following conditions; additional septic test data and adequate septic cl^cil^aotion! application can be scheduled for dm Ui ',1 ' * 'Jji^ tP-U t/u Co ibao CiU ojj / ’■€yts at c6or '-OL/J hj^L ^ Aa COhjAj^ loJCt [i®llDW SEP2 81983 CITY OF OROM ry Clark ed on the ubject property; e wetlands isfied jperty will not late septic iduled for hlcU(3LCru2 d->^ iZot CiCAjL^ hcf(>U ___ ^/J± t/'u^ ha-U<£u^ czct ti ^KA/ltU^ CohuAj. l/u h(Ti(AU ic/cti /uZc^ W. CiU OM LOOctL^ hlut'^-yuto ^-^.rnn -tAj bu<ZeijAy t() iHAst iJ-iji •■^yddt d<ym'eAXM.ccAA) dt t/u he-u^. ut CLUJ^ U O lUI cU a I/) US. S-uZ Sm.^zS7m tSkiCit^ CUc fijXc^ ^ictzd urTtSe jucaajcc (■OhjUj Wjf'/ P //\y9 ^., -/- -AT. - §@BDW[§ ] 7^ SEP 2 81963 i iLty CITYOFORONO #791 y^ss lif S. ’O' ;; ..; ■ '. H lk\ - :' i-.; .*V .i>: V;. • ¥r' »V i' w-J f* f . fWii:..............I HIM 1^'i’-' ^ ■ r' MV:m-: h 'IM piKn •f=; ..- •• Vp'-,- m-pm.: flmp} Ov /YM^^ 309^1. A- fif*/ Artm s 3.St Ac. s /.ect Ac. 1 " = 1CG« V-23-23 Iron n;jirkor #791 C'^rtiricutc of Surv'ey for Bruco D. Clark of. Lots 43 and 44, Hlook i, Orono Orcli-irds Hennepin Cour:ty, Minnesota Eayf #/ A^UJV^ #/ /ec ^•//7 I horvly coi'tiiy tfif.t tiiis ic a Iri.c ••nci correct rei.rescntr.tion of *i .*-nrvoy of the bcunur.ries of Loir 43 and 44, rlock 1, Orono Or-chards, and tfi/jt pfiz i of Charles Street (to l*e vjjcated) lyln£* iKi-twccr; the Sastoriy exteneior.n 0. ^ 1 hr fortherly *-nd Southerly I iron of roi-; Let /,?, trie locc- foi of ' ll cxir-lJnt luileintrs, if oj;y, Ir.crt.’c:.. It ices not 01. r.K'i t t'* r*;ov ether i r’;orcve-• • merts or encrc tcltni-jr.t.':. @©[10W SEP 2 81983 £ITY OF ORONO C-CRX'K R. rOFTIK CO., INC. Gor.'ion H. Coffin Her. T^, Mark .S. Uronber^; Rcf. Kc. 127^5 Land Surveyor:; and riannors I/inf trike, I'.irtno.*'ota U-..: :? >J^V''', ■■ ^ • 4 It L' J 'IPP-- r ■••^ ’>;• a' OMOdO i| miM Planning C Staff has for a work Commission List of E: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit L Exhibit M Exhibit N Please rev issues rai student/fa applicatio f OQQ I *i •I t. > •• 4— m'0m s:I 3 ^ c-.^ E•"8 8 * u m \i f .■ >. - •• •-.• ns^r’. .■•'■■'i v>.- ;: ^ - •i/V.' :* Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE:October 13, 1983 SUBJECT;#788 - Freshwater Foundation - 2500 Shadywood Road - Subdivision, Conditional Use Permit for duplex credit and PRD, Rezoning from B-4 to LR-IB Area - 23.65 acres Zoning Breakdown; B-4 area 2.62 acres LR-IB area 21.03 acres Total 23.65 acres Soils Makeup; Flood Plain Wetlands Dry Soils Total 8.11 acres 2.60 acres 12.94 acres 23.65 acres Planning Commission action - no action required - Work Session Staff has notified all property owners within 350' of the subject property for a work session meeting; notices will again be sent out, when Planning Commission calls for the public hearing. List of Exhibits: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Shardlow report dated September 16, 1983 E - City approval of subdivision - February 12, F - Metes & Bounds division G - Site data survey H - Development Plan I - Site Plan J - Grading Plan K - Landscape Plan L - Elevations M - Building Plan N - Sketch Plan of current subdivision 1973 Please review John Shardlow*s report (Exhibit D) that covers the key issues raised at the Council during an informal discussion of the FWBI's student/faculty housing proposal and the summary of the Institutes' current application before the City. #788 - Fi October ] Page 2 Zoning Ad The FWBI per the ' at a pot< the tota resident Duplex Cl The curre begin sor satisfiec of the n€ developme lot desic phase th£ next year the third of Minnes Rezoning Shardlow : Developmei for to cor Subdivisic A subdivis a legal de A subdivis acre lot f followed a FWBI facil University included i Minnesota, In discus I was adv Universit bounds de 1973 (see Site Data to the Un What does subdivisi approxima combinatii sewer lini 20' wide i :^4 od Road - lex credit and ssion I subject property it, when Planning 973 rers the key >n of the FWBI*s [nstitutes* current :v 4 m rJ; 4 ‘^. <1 ! . f ‘-i .••• i: ■'i^ li .v-\ V. ■ - “V rrs V , , ‘.cjL, #788 - Freshwater Foundation October 13, 1983 Page 2 Zoning Administrator’s brief review The FWBI claims a total of 23.7 acres of both dry and wet soils that reLdL^iardlvHop^nnLrLhibirS?.'^ Duplex Credit - PRD The current proposal (Phase 1) asks for two duplex units; construction to begin sometime this year. Duplex credit performance standards are (Ordinance 34.029); duplex units are all located within 200' Of the newly defined zoning boundary line. The subdivision for PRD development will create individual pads designated as lots with larger lot designated as outlot/open space area. Shardlow refers to a second duplex unit. Each duplex unit will be deeded to the University of Minnesota upon completion. cxoxuy Rezoning incorrect,B-4 zoning does not permit Planned Residential ^velopment - do^ zoning is necessary. A public hearing must be called for to complete this phase of the application. Subdivision A subdivision is necessary to create individual pads for housing units and A description for the deeds transferring ownership to the University FWBI facility. The Institute deeded this five acre parcel to the incTnSff^ Of Minnesota in 1976. Please note this five acre si?e is not included in the application because it belongs to the University of Minnesota, not the Freshwater Institute. ^ In discussing the need for a subdivision with the applicant's surveyor. I was advised that the deed that conveyed the entire facility to the tc the University. Note that the parcel contains LR-lB zoned land. What does that do to the FWBI's total land area claim of 23.65 acres? The subdivision must also include that portion of the LR-lB zoned land - ^ acres - to be designated as another lot for 2o'!'®wide"n?n^f^ intersect the property, these lines must be Lsignated as 20 wide utility easements on the plat. H ' M I .■ft, 'V fc i I W 1 I Li. , S*’"' W-- -X' ‘■is'-' h". < II f;' '• #788 - Fi October ] Page 3 Issues fc Planr schec the F heard as sc a pub with date Need 1. d 2. d n 3. s a c) Repor d) Repor acces if?''"-i’ oils that full development .62 acres of -IB to permit onstruction to rds are within 200* for PRD with larger to a second ction sometime the pad for the University sidential List be called ising units and the University, ceated a five :re parcel 5 the entire to the i site is not rsity of 's surveyor, :y to the metes and >y the City in on Exhibit G, :y transferred id land. 65 acres? The id land - .ot for .ty has i designated as I iL _ A.>4W|K b Vi 4 4 • ‘V! •'. >■ >..r #788 - Freshwater Foundation October 13, 1983 Page 3 Issues for consideration and direction; Planning Commission must call for public hearing«at next regularly scheduled meeting of Planning Commission? Shardlow has asked that the Planning Commission schedule a special meeting for the public ^®sring based on the time of year and need to begin construction as soon as possible. I have discussed the possibility of scheduling a public hearing at your October 31, 1983 Planning Commission meeting your chairman but we decided against this in consideration of the date and content of the agenda. Need to define scope and content of subdivision to applicant 1. determine ownership of various parcels that makeup property 2. define exact limits of University of Minnesota land and ask for new calculations for total residential development 3. shared access road of residences and FWBI should be designated as outlet within outlet c) Report from City Engineer on proposed use of City services. d) Report from Hennepin County Highway Department on proposed shared access location and review of right of way. 3 iM.- ■ i mm w V- -'ll i : ' VJ; U •' m ■Mi- r L lu «• -I O M ^ O • z z >-: 0 0-1 lU 141 CO < -4 -I m I O O CM < £S in iu in #- tt iU o o . q: q: K -i if O O O IT M M o O ID o tt ft >- 2 {If H 3 * SSSU XX QC ID lO O < I4J lU O > tt a lo < 14. IC CM z Jlfr’ liif? :t regularly IS asked that : the public instruction r of scheduling unission meeting lideration of the ilicant > property id and ask for >e designated ’^ices. iposed shared T0 O tt O M oa o o u K) •< o O CM M iU iiJ o Z t p tt tt K £ N >• O O < •H -J _ M tt V =*=*?§ rH M M in IU <D M S S S X M o -> “> CM UJ CM ro o 0 r-f m CM 1 fH •H I COfO Ul |4Joc q: li. li.o o CM in |S " flD 0 CM Z z Z o q: HI-___ M a z 0 CK tt C O O < tt o O Z 0 < < >• \ ft < ly OL 0 a. z: o z X <3 ^ 2 GL O K r r X o ^ U OLM _ UJ X HI <VJ ® H H < IS rlSSSig 1-4 O M M J. M O -|< Q ^ _ O X_ ^ r eg o O eg ^ ^ Qc K) o :i^ ^ eg s M M tt tt o >» z UJ Ul <^ Q SH K 3 ^ < X X Ul g eo GC Z X CO oc 10 en o < UJ UJ o o > o: tt lo < u. CL eg z I V U vbir‘; O < K O Z Ul < >• ^ K < L v,^-; . r. '•-■ .:f; - > -» i ^ ■>1 < M ►• O C^ * Ul UJ d: lAa fc X 4fi UJ o o >- u < lu d: lAi |2;io o u »- o P CO H < UJ o M X >- P ^ O ^ < X Qc eg 3 rl3 UJ o Hg < tt O No eo V ui ^ < O eg 3 Wb ■>* < ^ < UJ eg 3 UJ tt tt C O g < tt gO Z UJ < < >- N tt < Ul IL Ul CL Z 1122 eg u eg < Ul M to ID X eg in I O UJ -j M•H o o V 2“-®•j < CO CO tt -I O tt O I- to < o eg M o g> UJ to o ««o X eg UJ Ul tttt r o g 5 tt O 9 Z Ul < < V \ CL UJ a z 2 2 >< < 1 -V u. "3 <1-4 o o -J MtoO tt <to•• >-to o 1- M to X 3 X 2.. 2... 10 O Ul M toCOlO o eg o i-c z 10 to >- <n < eg o z M c^ z • < O tt f^ z X CO tt eg •H CO M < tt rf tt X X o• tt _ O M r! .A S 21 ® ^ eg lo z mj •H Z eg UJ ^ g> X X u M o “» ”1 oc m o3£CO >- M O tt tt < O tt X M < CO CO < to UJ X CO o O 40 X o eg UJ X M 10 Ul X > lO u o < ^ X ^ O eg UJ UJ tt tt Z O g 2 tt oO X UJ < tt < UJ tt Z o Z X < H K 10 UJu ^ X eg UJ tt ttUl UJ CO CO CO CO Ul Ul ■J -J to UJ -J -j cj < < ^ X O O eg UJ 10 o CO1 U iH COoO o to oO tt Ul to oM &0 tt O 10 toeg z 2“eg to CO eg <UI^Z to eg1 UJ Ul z < z 1 ^;£O X CO M < < CL i N 1-4 UJ UJ o pg1_ I M 1 pgp4 eg 10 X E CO ^ o ^ to o UJ «• 0 > _ < CO t to UJ I eg o X : .^SSi eg M < 4 1 O a c >• M -i IL C I o c •H tt C eg o < 4 _ g> o 2 eo eg Ul u to o ^ . to eg lO CO tt lO UJ li X o u \CO <g or f-C to O U. CL 0eg rg o Ul Q rg tt z cUloO < tt coO X Ui<< >• NoXtt < uua UJ a z §t-O X X <1 <tt 3 < 2cetoCL o h- ,T- *> lUu. M 0 0 3 O q; •O CM 3 Z •A CO 2 2 Kl o ro < lA O lO q: CM ^ I&. U. • IXi U. li. N X O O ^ a X X z < CO M in o o M M >CO CM < < K> € sMi X M a CO 10 Mlu ^ X CM lil O X »- to H Oi Z to CO CM CM I N rC I M SS IM te. •- H ft O____tel < < >- N. O. telS Z X ^1 , •!- tl ’ ■ ml*h: - ■ ii: ■ \- ; w lO to lO Ma • tel §s I teJ t- CO >» CO § M 2!n tt M O -M IM z CO M ft Ml t- S K O tel Q. >- O H CL tel CL >- O t Qc Z Q. Z M O. Mi Ml Z to CM Ml K < O rM O o s ft u ►- L Ml li. M to o tel 0 > CM O to < CM M 1 O 1^ >- iH -J rC I rM CM CO _ 'O CO CM to O «• to to CO CO 10 Mi tel tej lO X X > Z X - M S5-'!3s s >K o o ^ u Mi Ml M> X •i -J CM tel CM Mi to > CM < to >- CM -i I •J tel M X iH I M M H H < < tel gc ft > < < f-c to to 10 CM O^ h* CO CM to O -C 3 Z X ^ O Mi M CO CO X CO < < -i x: £ 9^ Ml O O 9* u z X X t- 1 “ CM tel CM o o Ml to > CM < rH to to lO lO < h- teJ to CM I r>» tel ft >H X Ml ri I CJ 0-4 Ml CM 10 CD 10 X CM O li. CO to lilz >g<g o >- CD -J ft ^ O -I Ml M X CO ft ^ Mi 10 tel O to U o r- X ft CM Ml tel ft ft £ a < >* \ ft < tel a Ml a X o z X < CK 3 < Z O. O t- u CM to O til O > -I w ^ ? CM O lil to 5 Ml CM M ft » O lil N- >- M iH ^ ^ •H• Z •H < CM ^ > CO _ M) M CO CM to O rC til to ft to Ml 10 M lil to -i > < o z > or £ < M M ft O O lil >• M O -i CO ^ lil CO U < M) X CM tel ri to 0 LU O > K,^ CM O Z ft O to < H CM M .J 1 Q ft N >. < fH «i CJ iH CM «H H to ft to lO z > “^ o< 0-4 CM O < O 2 50} CM o to o o ft q: £ < - M ^ -J CO < -i Z O Miz ^ u O M> X O CM tel ft o tel ft £ -- o < ft a a z ui < < >- N ^ ft < teJ CL lil CL X O Z X < L r N to liJ to > -I CM < < to >- tel CM -I rllZiS I iH O CM O Z i 0-4 to to 10 10 CO CM to O•'g tel lil > u.^5 ^ -i O >- Ml M Z X CO CL -I O Mito U ft r* X £ CM tel to O tel to > CM 0-f to to lO to to >- CM -I • -I K lil ^ X 0H I CM O CM «0 CM to o < COz z < Ml Z Mi tel M M ft ft Ml Ml Mi > -i ft -J O Mi M X CO h" h» < ^ u u o tel CM CJ X CM tei 10 to o o lU to > CM < fO CM tel iH I 0-4 CM O CM CO CM to O z o CO Zz o < CO X z < lii X 0-4 to to lO lO Ul > ^ ^ .1 ft ' O M CO M M ft ft lU MJ U U Mi X o CM CM Miu Xtel ft o Mi ft £ _o < ft o O Z Mi <C < >- Nft < Ul CL Mi CL X al3So ft , CL O H r CM to to to CM Ir^ rH rH I M> rH CM CO to CM O o to to to CM I rH rH • 'Ml rH CM CO Z I- 5 CO o z M. M lO o o ft -I < < Mi CJ CO MiiS o o M M CO CD CM C^ to to 10 tei tel o X < < lii 3 3 X ft Z X O ft CO CO CO < lil tel > ft ft o <u. M. a z CM <^ to to lO ft ft z tel o Xtel H •- C^ < < III 3 3 X ft X X O ft CO CO CD < MJ MJ > ft ft O < M. li. CL Z CO to o o MJ ^ to > < CM < t- Mi to V CM -I ft • -i •< N Ml N rH ^ O V « rH *J CM OJO z X CO CM o to o -I rH to to lO lO CL ft 9^ Z < X N CM O ft X X o . O-J CO CO Z CM MJ Z u O K X n ft tel ft o MJ ft £ _ o < ft a a z Mi < < >• N ^ ft < tel CL Mi CL Xo ?: X < ft n < z ft o H L L u h- < 00 2 g CM o O ft o g CO ft Mi zo CO ft tel II Kl CJ to < m B S CM • O «• O £ •H -0 9^ U ft to Z lO < Z lOz u < Hi tel “5S P S o 2 M p N 3 iH >- to < Z CM 3 O Z I- D CO O Z li. M P CM O o to to ft -J < < MJ CJ CO M Ml O ft O to CM I o o M Hi CO CO CM 9" to lO 10 rH I %o 0-4 ft fttei Ui CM CO < < 3 3 Z X CO CO tel lil ft ft li. li. o o rH Xo CO o ft tel ft 3 > < Z tel ft £ O < S== a£ ft Z ft o ft o ft o MJ < ^ \ < tel ft £ L •••rm aTy"OT"oim^°” °* **’* Conmission 16 September 1983 Page 2 developed the proposed housing units will Lso be given tHnd subsequently maintained by the University of Minnesota. discussion, it is the concensus of opinion of th^. the City staff and consutants, that the fact aff*» *■ ^ exemption from local zoning will not adversely affect the City s control of either this, or any subsequent develL- ment proposal on this site. This conclusion is based b^two development proposal. The first factor IS that the Freshwater Foundation owns this property and the Foundation is subject to Orono's official controls/ oCvioISly, this application is for approval under the provisions of the Orono oning r inance and any future development proposal by the Foundation would also have to be. toe^UnivL^^r®®r^l ■ f'^^^hwater Foundation to deed tothe university of Minnesota only that land which the proposed units furthLTf °w"«ship of all of the test. Furt^rmore, a intends ®^*®9uarding mechanism is the fact that the Foundation intends to transfer the ownership of these units subject to a enant stipulating the use of these buildings and this land ordinancr^^i°\''^^^ consistent with Orono’s codes and resiu frL*thif^‘®''“ conditions of approval which mayresult from this approval process. ^ In summary, the proposed development is sooject to con?)liance with regulations and the units and land which will be itf clt° university will be subject to a covenant stipulating Its continued compliance. All of the remainder of the subject ^ Md^^thLIf^ ""“k" **'® °*'"«‘'®''ip of the Freshwater Foundationand, therefore, subject to Orono control. unaacion Orono-s Costs to Provide Police, Fire, utility, and Other Local Service's the Proposed Housing romni.v. - - - Willingness of the University to Enter into an Compensate the City for these Costs ^ Orono*s costs associated with providing services to the proposed housing units, has been discussed at length with representatives of the University and the City staff. The University has other enSr^^!\"^’"' relationships with other cities aSd has entered into agreements with them to pay for these costs. It has been agreed that the City will determine the nature and mam ember 1983 Page 2 stitute to : occupies proved and to and of opinion the fact adversely nt develop- two factor the ously, the Orono he y deed to 3sed units srmore, a ition :o a Land, les and /hich may ince with .11 be pulating •ject undation oposed atives of er i has 3. mm lii'iii'f' II rrifiiHir' t > V- '■A- -V5 Chairman, Members of the Planning Commission CITY OF ORONO 16 September 1983 Page 3 amount of these local service costs. Then an appropriate agree- ttese'^costs? University to compensate Orono for Effect .of the Subject Proposal on the Sanitary Sewer System. Orono Sanitary Sewer District No. 8 ^- -- The third primary concern which was raised at the informational with the impact of this proposal on the City's sanitary sewer system waste controrcesmissiof €;♦>»«■ i ^ north, consists of a series of several lift iTlhT^' concern about the capacity of some Since in this system in the current state. jec property contains about thirty percent of the After reviewing this matter with City staff and City's enqineerina M^for^tie ‘hat the Freshwater Foundation should MW s? ™ r .K ‘his situation. The Foundation prior W """ ^se« ay®‘®"' improvement and would beassessed according to its benefit. PROPOSAL SUMMARY !• Site Summary summary sheet illustrates (Figure 1) the prooertv owned by the Freshwater Foundation consists of 37.95 acres A Beaci aL ;he corporate limits of Mi;netonka 5 of acrfs Freshwater Biological Institute occupies mini- -r I Therefore, a total of 23.65 acres remain for develop ment. Just over thirty-four percent (8.11 acres) of the total beneath the flood generally ident f* ri additional 2.6 acres has been ^rly dMiMrsoir^”" * “ having Chairma CITY OF tmber 1983 Page 3 agree- rono for System, tionai yr*s er system i-ssion lift of some iate. >f the ilopment (ineering thould lation pected ur units, the s of ation of ement ally be property A inetonka ipies levelop- »tal 'lood I been i having f' i«i : W--;. .mm * **•'. ■ - Chairman, Members of the Planning Commission CITY OF ORONO 16 September 1983 Page 4 Property Zoning The vast majority of this site (21.03 acres) is zoned LR-lB, Low Density Residential, with a minimum lot area requirement of one ®cre. However, a small portion (2.62 acres adjacent to the FWBI) is zoned B-4, Commercial. As noted in the development summary, the combination of the density permitted by the dry buildable area within the property and the one unit per acre wetland equivalent provided by the City Ordinance yields a maximum development potential of 23 units. Development Program a.Fountainhead Program, The entire housing program proposed to satisfy the students and visiting scientists housing needs addressed in the Fountainhead Program is illustrated on Figure 2. As this figure illustrates, a total of eight (8) housing units will be built in three phases. Phase 1 includes half of the total program, and consists of two duplex structures (four units). Phase 2 is planned for construction next year and it consists of one duplex (two units for a total of six units). To provide an opportunity for family nousing to support summer internships, research, and exchange programs. Phase 3 is currently planned to consist of two single family units. The total of these three phases will equal eight (8) units, the complete goal established in Fountainhead. b.Future Expansion Space. This planned unit development appli cation covers only the eight units and phases addressed above. However, the development plan on Figure 2 also illustrates a potential site for another future duplex and the potential location for the expansion of the Freshwater Biological Institute. Neither of these potential developments are currently planned, or funded, and have only been presented to demonstrate that they could occur compatibly in the future. Institute expands, along with the demand for programs which require additional housing, that development would be the subject of another application. Site Design Concepts The basic concept for the development of housing units on this site is to concentrate this development in the area immediately adjacent to the FWBI and to preserve the vast majority of the remainder of the site in its natural state. The site plan for Phase 1 is illustrated on Figure 3. A number of important considerations led to the develojanent of this arrangement of buildings and related circulation system. Chairman CITY OF 6 September 1983 Page 4 ned LR-lB, Low rement of one nt to the FWBI) tnent summary, y buildable wetland maximum ram proposed musing needs trated on of eight (8) 1 consists of s planned for iuplex (two units rtunity for research, and I to consist of jree phases will .ished in ‘lopment appli- iddressed above illustrates a le potential ological tents are in presented to I the future. for programs lent would be its on this site diately adjacent e remainder of base 1 is siderations led and related Chairman, Members of the Planning Commission CITY OF ORONO 16 September 1983 Page 5 a. b. p 3r:.;33"s-' have a car. The second important fact to remember is that these prople would already be at the Institute, that is, the proposal truly doesn't add traffic. Furthermore, ther^will be no vehicle trips associated with travel to and from the Institute to work. However, the matter of not adding ^ additional traffic to the existing entrance, which doesn’t have ideal sight distance along County Road 19, has been given strong consideration. service area of the FWBI is proposed Vi h south and to share an access with better driie^iin'h''^^? t housing units. The existing service access closed off and relandscaped, it has been decided that since the amount of service traffic is so negligible, there will not be a problem with sharing this driveway with the proposed units. Potential Institute Expansion. Jh! “®®"»ich could be affected by the future expansion of- - the Institute is illustrated on Figure 3. There is ample land for this to occur and the relocation of the service drive will ® relationship with the potential futurebuilding configuration. ^•7:’;^!"!*’^'' "^**‘ **’‘ ^°P°q'^«Phy, Exlstino Vegetation. £igod_Plain Elevatren. After considering the factore set forth detailed locations of these units was dictated bv consideration of all, their relationship alono 111 Significant vegetation was located, along with other relevant topography, and the flood plain e evation^ by Strgar-Roscoe Inc,, land surveyors. The proposed units will be split level and have entrances at ^th levels. The specific siting of each unit was therefore V ^rticular relationship to the site, along with setbacks from roadways and the flood plain elevation, the protection of existing trees, and the proper orientation to maximize the potential for solar exposure and use of the marsh. Site Grading, Protection of Trees. Erosion Control The site grading concept is consistent with the basic development concept (see Figure 4). The grading will be limited to the Lnimum c. fy H ’* •> - : \im I.- ■ t ■V;. 1 l?n :». 'iS : 1 1 h? r-X.-: I j'/ % W 3! -'.* ■ ■ ‘/j< 1 € i-?-: ^ .... :..1 K It.» »'< v-i-V’ tt Chairman, Members of the Planning Comnission CITY OF ORONO 16 September 1983 Page 6 required to construct units, drives and parking spaces, and to install the proposed landscaping. The construction limits are xllustrated on Figure 4* SL*coistroctioro^t**^.**FrT ’'s* ^ specified to guide Erosion control straw baler*wiirte‘in*pLcrdi^Lg*1onstrurt and maintained until the site is restored. Any erosion problems Will be quickly and effectively mitigated. Landscaping The existing Freshwater Biological Institute site was developed with a strong landscape treatment. The plan for the landscaping associated with the proposed housing units is to extend this same treatment. All of the plant materials chosen are fully hardy, native and indigenous species, and will serve to blend the proposed units into their natural surroundings. Discussion of Architectural Treatment of Proposed Units basic summary follows. illustrated on Figure 6 and building elevations and sections are illustrated on Figure 7. ©xhibits show, the proposed duplex units will each contain f^c As the building section on Figure 6 shows, the living room of the two units will overlap in the center e s ructure though they will be totally separated. Atrium spaces are shown between the bedrooms and the living rooms and a!!rLylighL'^°'^^*^ enhanced by windows facing the south exposure To insure compatibility with the FWBI the plans call for the use of the s^e brick as was used on the Institute. As the elevations Illustrate, the relationship with the Fmi is further improved with a similar use of wood detailing. t ’#s«Vir— MV i A i ■ q I i5 v6 *-4.% •. : ■<T'3» ^ v-V I ». - ' • • I'i / r Chairman CITY OF C. SUMMJ The ( the I ment permi All o have After consu effec In CO] ation consii object progr£ any in raised adjace To < firs proc hop€ you up-c the to a cont of o all : Sincerely, enclosures cc: Di. Jos Ri chare Members Elizabe ber 1983 Page 6 > guide stalled site i. iction »blems oped aping s same proposed ect pcoming estions ew, a Figure Lgure 7. ::ontain ;ure 6 :enter rium ind exposure i use nations red V 1 t.• V -. :■ -mn p;# m"iW Hi y.. ■•f 'it.] •Hi' ■t'l •1 ' W ?■' •' ■j ■r^-: ;<. :• •■' V i fi y«;i _r '•■ Co.„issio„16 September 1983 Page 7 C. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION ment meets or excels ® Ordinance. The proposed develop- permitted densiT^r the •=s•-“" aUoraira^roval hw^b^en't '’“r*’’' y°“r consider-consistent w^trche nr!n r “«f “Uy prepared. They are fully objectives of the Fountainhead"p *"'* ’=*'«y accomplish the Wrsr^se'of^hird^^^lo^enr^ program, construction will*^need to comen*° summers research hope that you will aaree th^e n November. We sincerely you will be confident in recomendinrapproval^of ®"‘*up-coming meeting. We will he n-e- ^ this program at your the development t;am ^n^repr^se^taUve: to anwer any questions which you may have We 1^^^“® continuation of our etrene ,-i ^ . " ^°°’' forward to the of Orono and ultimateirto thf relationship with the City all be proud ‘he completion of a project which we will Sincerely, JohnJ^rShardlow P^^pal Planner Wcha°rGray‘ freshwater Foundation M^ers --dation Elizabeth Close, Close Associates Inc. M Hv .m ' • / L4- r-: m: ••■vH V ■4a j fr #r WA}m:: :J r ■ ■“ wmmmi ’■• -jn; "if i.i f .• *4 » Massengale the grant ii Biological that this I of any wat< property. pf----At-r STATE OF COUNTY o; VILLAGE < of Orono, - Minutes c Village C ; the origi . said orij . at said N seal, this £(seai-) .i'" ■'. ' * *r a. *: ^ ■ f-J- •y - w> •V f a 1- • t. '■•V • seconded, to approve ilfiof the division to the Freshwater that^thl«^mI??^^^K^^ ^ut with the understanding of «^f«ct on the levying the oivisioN ;' Freshwater Biological Institute* -- - -- aav on tne 1 charges against property. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN VILLAGE OF ORONO ) ) ) of Orono, li co'^l'Z***'* Village ' ■ liS; a :: p:0 . seal. hereunto set ay ha.^ and '* •' :>t\ ■ ''*'V;v‘-' ■ X ames w. uosoy, c^rx-AdmihistratorW<y (SEAL) : -• « ! f- "'-ir ?' ’ ir. ~ ’ ■■ ■■■■ .nistrator . . ■ - ' <■ ' .' .-... • rX . . . ••’i * , • ■ 1 .>■ • V; .’... ’ “■. .•■'•, ^ '■* • ■ • •• • . • • . *.. ■■*• i- 'v •_______^ * V — r a * V.T .la V rV * r • ••t ' \ » f • A./S . ‘ V *.r * •■^ -vv*r ,.i;; f j .. ■ ■- , .. ; . I %* • :i’-■:.••=' * ^ -• •■• • .fr.r. ‘ .•«*•.>, •• rvA- •■ = •• 1 .• . . he >w • ; ^ .'r t N.y t • I T ^ y» • P • * ^ ■» V S ^ V .J r • ' • • t. • / . • ? ‘ . , V Wi' >r Biological >/7A* n*-’ ■a5i‘4®4s ’■ < >t M t . •;»* V. '• . . •i A ,»WV. . ^.a-yK »■> . .> ;■• ■.,■■'■ r- ■ ■ r'- ■ . ■■■..>., PV\VV»\I u:> _ J..,.—- ; v li I^Do^^iii#». • ll*ot»oC V*« CitT lots . 10b *OC«1A»>miC MAPriNG .. licvn w cc^iiic-c. OF sc*c. "io C. E.Coulter & associates. Inc. JOH.N A. PCTUnSO.N FOANK K.- LCNZ. JR. LAND SURVEYORS RtctSTfvro u*40rtr LAw^or \rAir or minncsota liCtNoio av o*«niKa»itta (•* «.atv or M«MNraa*o«ia 3900 LYNDALC AVC. SO. MINNCAPOU5. MINN. SS40U 024^370 a pomr k riAlTlM#! fAtfM tljAVfYG I ARCftHOiir ^UOlClAt ' O Ourbc^r'tf Ccrlifiuilc EXHIBIT A €Y/' y* 5ckLi£ : \" a»o<5 * Aa SHOU).vI ap -G ASG ums P 4>yip t 'S,\f,y ■ ^ • • \rv •, . - . .*. A-, ♦•♦-. •* *• • i * ' :;••• . •■ r«-vvt; • • # • • '. J J ' ■•*•.“ • .. •■.■•'• ■•■■*L•■•:'• .• "-.V.: ..-• .;. • / ■ : • ’ O • '. • :. ;r;; :: . . r / ' • ’ *. T* Xo ri' • ' '• *• X • ■• •■ •= •• ’ll •/ Ml '/!f*^ . V * I *.*• > ^/y * ^ ^ • • o 9 * • • •.* v* • •; * ^ /<7) *• • • . • .* • i ; . • - :•• i -;>' ‘.X• • • • • . ?. X • • ^ East lng of ofc .zo*' v". •;V '.V5i'> -y= V 4 ’. >. 11 :., S I; 4- 4--’ ''Aa f y- ri'. :y 11 I •MDUSf •UftllW’% %% • Cffv lotm . • < J .Frcshvatox* Bio! Village of Orox Kavarre Projeel That parL of G< MixincsoLji dcsci Section 20, th< 1760.44 foot; t to as Point A; distance of 49, radius of 651.! .312.64 feet, me Road Ko. 19, as aforesaid Point being the actu2 K20*52*16"c ale a distance of 5 S39«42'50-W a d right of way li right of way li bvM X4«i'i i «*Cf 2 Subject to ease Subject to futu 'r. • • ^ • • * •• •• • • _ • .• •. ••« '.:••• : .■.■'..•.■.-<•1 ... • •• • . • 4. • » • • • g ,t -• • 4^ • • • « • • •,: :.•:, .;• • • ■ • • * .1 " • *. r.s' • ■ .... • •• • m ^ • . * • .*. • • .:*•• 3 ‘ • » A • • €NOUSt^«A^ ' ^ CtfT LOWS lT0^OCftA«*««lC C, E.coulter 6: Associates. !nc. JOHN A. rCYCHSON ^ TRANK H.. LCNZ. JH. LANO SURVEYORS ftcci&Tr.Nco uNOcn l«.w^ or statc or minnc &ota tlCCM^iO mr OVUINANCt % or ClW or MISNtA»'Uk«^ 3300 LYNDALE AVC. SO. *• *i MINNEAPOLIS. MINN. SS400*'-. 024-0370 ri4f tii«o rA«M fy«ivc%i lAiCCtNOlc .Frcshvatcx* Biological Laboratory Village of Orono, Kavarre Project ^^urbepor*!?. CcrJificafc That part of Government Lot 1, Section 20» Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the North Quarter corner of said Section 20, thence N87*43*50"E along the North" lino of said Section 20 a distance of 1760*44 feet; thence S2®16'10**E a distance of 33.00 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point A; thence N87*43*50E parallel with the North line of said Section 20 a distance of 49.60 feet; thence along a tangential circular curve to-the left having a radius of 651.51 feet for. a distance of 265.40 feet; thence S20*52*16“w a distance of •312.64 feet, more or less, to a point in the Northeasterly right of way line of Countv Road No. 19, as now located and traveled, said joint being 310.00 feet Southeasterly of aforesaid Point A as measured along said Northeasterly right of way line, said point being the actual joint of beginning of the parcel of land to be described; thence K20*52*16"5 along the last described line a distance of 215.00 feet; thence S73*37*41'*E . a distance of 505.19 feet; thence S35*37*10"E a distance of 233.00 feet; thence S39*42*50**w a distance of 350.00 feet, more or Icss^ to a joint in said Northeasterly right of way line of County Road No. 19; thence Northwesterly along said Northeasterly right of way line a distance of 620.00 feet, more or less , to the actual joint of X*4<| ; • • • . • . - Subject to easements and restrictions of record", if any. • • • • . . Subject to future widening, and improvement of said County Road No. 19. • ••J • • A • «•• - • • • • • • .• • • ' •. - . . * • * / • ' ' : i ^ • *• V . •. • • * • •• ." % ■ •.-< -1 .. • •4. • » • • • ^ • *.• “ f •• •• • ♦ * • • i,.-1. •: .-I. ® ^ I heroby.certify that thlo ourvoy, plan, or Report wao prepared by mo or under ny direct supervleion and that I am a duly Surveyor under the laws of the State of Ulnnocota. .** t . •• r. 4 ■ • * • V 3. • ^ ii. • • •• . is ca.A •t : • • • ••• • ••Date. • ••• t V ■ • ' "*••• • •: ** •• •' "i*. ;■ • V *• • "' .':V.;- •"• •• •*. .• -.V -i-.? • •; : ■.••••*•'• • .% # • '1111 Vo.■ > •" • •• • • ;*•• fiU. • * . • • ••:. • •• .f ; • . .v.>: A*-• . *.•*• • •••- . • • • • 4 • • • • I •I • • • . • • . .T • • ^ •• «• •I • •• • I \ • • >^GGTS e<v4 • ■5HeeT '.7. OF -2 6HCCTS .site di rAtiti fyaiv(%t lAACtNpIc» nepin County# r of said a distance of rcinaftcr referred Section 20 a s left having a ’ll a distance of f line of County Southeasterly of le# said point 3ed; thence lence S73*37*41"E L; thence Korthcasterly Ld Northeasterly lal point of : •• -1 • i m • * • • • •• ».v ., • •• • • . ••• SHCCTS : Si"'' n rtV-4 AfwftiOpp*tAM M. A ___ %JfJU ac t.07 ac. mtirnm arMasi MJUm, m-w sMi 9fJ0»ML All ML ILJO ttC tJOM. Onr iiMfeii Atm umm.JISf}Its WM* JliMM mTSms Freshwater Foundation Orono, Minnesota Vl^ site data summary •• « 4 !»•> / .i- 1 w • j? ;i J :V' mmfV t:ri;: . r i^ie 2«*« devetopme BUILW nesota KS k: s,-.I ,■■■•; rnmgm * ' '■ f ' ' *'* 9«r —p ----------t- if w ^ ,* / '■ ^ • ?1 €D>VW w . -4 1---- <---- r-n \ =N c '-f 1 m \ --------^r # i 1 ^ r;v M!l^ * • * ^ •• . • 7 ^ « r • i ' UPPER UEVEL PLAN . §:ts Wm.: ' aJ. LOWER LEVEL PLAN tOUAM ftCT m 1449 Freshwater Foundation otAouATesTUDon'MOUSMQ Orono, Minnesota V^y omfxuNm n«» iMv^a ■• ^ *»• • *"* • li»«> fc— - ari? ssjrii •Sl •V I $■ Wi > -/ ![i./ ■ k .(-■A < •a- « \ > : -i.i» ’ Nltf' A3 r.- undation fono, Mirmesola mm •m -• ^ • • , > •• 't*' afis vi-L/ ^ ' y' . ' / . ' / • mmwm ^ ,_,' '":^^' ,v -tiieFlreshwatcr Foundation ~lii .... • " ’ '-presents '--■fsi .1 ^ fe;/ JTh'3^1 r/,- '<• « V< V \ > iountaiiihed^; 4f^> *a ^tkLiiewr ••^s./ P > V-* ^ k ‘ater^iaMile.^^*-^ ♦ |M- ^ '-:;• ^'Vv. \ <■ . • -x - Jis_ H ■"-* -V 4n ^ ^ ^ ~r^^7. Y ■ >^2d < x^Z. V-“ '-4. VW- ' £ T.-•■'f.i:?;* >^' , « -V '> . < IfT vs .'J SV- B.''^ • -P- A < i if \'i . fp '• rK-i '»•. i b:;- The Freshwater F< A public. non*pro basic goal: to kee _ .1- Contents: Freshwater; the prc a three the Foundation; be' the Institute; initiati* the Foundation: a r the Society........... the Foundation: fin Fountainhead: the Fountainhead: the Fountainhead; hud the Foundation: Icc Ways to ^ivc......... the Foundation; toe - r hedd / '-v» ■ ^ . W / . ~,r' . «r ^^^'> -^ -r jfeCD OTT ' ' ^^cpi^v "Tk?ers^U«)le.^‘’^ - y *'. / ^ -7* ,-C « 'V ^ ' W ^ <9 CV -- ^ r V Fountainhead The Freshwater Foundation - since 1968 - A public, non profit Minnesota corporation with a basic goal: to keep our waters usable. .i1U‘*%r’’ * \ \ s .r- ' . . Alri.: Contents: P«ae Freshwater: the problems................................................. ^ a three-step solution....................................... 4 the Foundation: beginning ............................................... 5 the Institute: initiation and operation.................................. 7 the Foundation: a rededication......................................... 9 the Society..........................................................................11 the Foundation: financial review........................................12 Fountainhead: the need .....................................................13 Fountainhead: the specifics.................................................15 Fountainhead: budget and cash flow..................................19 the Foundation: legal certificates........................................20 Ways to give ........................................................................21 the Fouiulation: today .......................................................22 Water. We all drink it. We all use it. We all need it to live. And we are abusing the use of it. Is there enough for everyone? Is it safe to use? The Freshwater Foundation ... Concerned. Looking for answers. Looking for solutions. Looking for help. To keep our waters usable. A lot has been accomplished. But there’s more to be done. We’re ready for the next step: Fountainhead. ^ . Mm I "Thb decade's biggesl enuimnmentat issue will be pollution of underground drinking water supplies with chemirats, sewage, mine tailings, and garbage." —A 1980 report by the Council on Environmental Quality FOUNTAINHEAD... a primary source... for water. The Freshwater Foundation, 1982-1987: ...A FOUNTAINHEAD. THE FOUNTAINHEAD PROGRAM: A new. $7 million, five-year program to build upon the expertise of the Freshwater Foundation and the Gray Freshwater Biological Institute. A program to intercept the growing international water crisis. IN THIS BOOKLET: To better understand the need for Fountainhead, the history and purposes of the Freshwater Foundation are first described, followed by the details of the Fountainhead program. FRESHWATER FOUNDATION OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS Richard G. Gray. Sr. Chairman and President Dr. Richard S. Caldecott Vice Chairman Sewall D. Andrews. Jr. Roger L. Baker William M. Baker Raymond D. Black William M. Bracken Mrs. Herbert W. Busher Dr. Thomas E. Brunelle George T. Pennock Vice Chairman Lindsay G. Arthur. Jr Secretary; Mrs. Benton J. Case Henry Doerr Kingsley Foster Gilbert P. Goetz James L. Hetland. Jr. Dr. Joseph T. Ling David T. McLaughlin W. Duncan MacMillan Treasurer Charles M. Moos Earl H. Mosiman Mrs. William G. Phillips Dr. Dean K. Rizer Robert L. Searles Mrs. Edward R. Titcomb Thomas L. Warner Dr. Joseph P. Rossillon Executive Director. Freshwater Foundation Christine Olsenius Coordinator. Society' of the Freshwater Foundation Past Directors of the Freshwater Foundation J. Ford Bell* Herbert D. Bissell Russell D. Brackett* Dr. Alan J. Brook Earle Brooks Carroll E. Crawford Russell Ewald Robert W. Gibson Hibbcrt M. Hill Dr. John B. Moyle* * deceased Mrs. John B. Moyle Leonard F. Ramberg Mrs. John M. Shank Philip Von Blon James J. Williams Dr. John M. Wood r rrr 1/ Lssiie will be pollution of i with chemicals, sewage, mine 1 Eiwimnmental Quality acMillan X)S lan j. Phillips Wzer ritfs Titcomb arner ter Foundation rS ik Freshwater: the problems "The energy crisis will seem p,ile compared to what we are about to see in the area of freshwater. Contamination of our crwironment has reached epidemic proportions." Dr. Valentine O'Malley, Minnesota Medical Association A WATER CRISIS Water is life. Water is in trouble. Wafer, the one essential resource upon which all life depends, is in crisis. Because we must have water to live, each of us is directly and personally involved in the water crisis. Water problems are people problems: caused by people, affecting people, and only people can solve them. To better understand the gravity of the situation, we must first appreciate the two laws of “aquadynamics.” or rules that govern water. The first concerns q uantit y; the second, q ualit y. T f A ■>< ir wm- *. . QUANTITY: IS THERE ENOUGH WATER? Water covers 70% of the earth ’s surface. However. 97% of that water is salt water and 2% is trapped as ice in polar regions. Only 1% represents our potential fresh water supply. That small percentage of water represents essentially all the fresh water people will ever have available for use. The first law of aquadynamics states that water can be neither created nor destroyed. The amount of water available on earth has remained essentially the same over eons of time and will continue to be so. By means of the continuous global hydrologic or precipitation-transpiration-evaporation cycle, the “same ” water is constantly recycled and reused. While the amount of available water remains constant, the world’s population and water use continue to increase, resulting in less available water per person. Limited finite water quantity and the unequal distribution of it are serious concerns. ♦ ^ QUALITY: IS OUR WATER SAFE TO USE? The first law of aquadynamics suggests that the q uantit y of water may remain essentially the same, but the second law states that the q ualit y of water does not. Water is nature ’s sewer system. Everything ends up in water sooner or later. Nature should be able to effectively filter water for safe reuse. However, changing water use and today ’s advanced technology have both overloaded the system and introduced into it countless foreign materials that nature does not understand and cannot degrade properly. These foreign materials, many of them toxic, may remain in the water forever. The question of concern becomes: Even if there is enough water, is it usable? Unusable water is the same as no water at ail. THE NEED FOR CHANGE: TO KEEP OUR WATERS USABLE The same amount of water for more and more people means less and less per person. The ever-increasing use and misuse of water means an ever-decreasing quality. To avoid the “bottom line of such negative trends — not enough water, no usable water, no life — change must occur. The ways in which people use... and misuse... water must change. For change to occur, the Freshwater Foundation believes a major three-step process is essential: to generate information, to facilitate education, and to motivate action. ■: .;/• ■ - ■■ i IH •-5 ■■ -A «t- V- •... . . •i '.d I 4 if TO GENERATE If Before we can chanc what we know and w in generating necess, The second step is improve our water s> recycling systems, foi are most appropriate gathered from reseai may also raise many A broad, impartial be and expanded, is nec crisis, to choose intellij to keep pace with nev TO FACILITATE I Information alone v Change also depe information. For inf must be systematical about a change. The purpose of < publications is to get I in a factual and und< Most changes will noi situation and the nee educational programs progressing through t arriving at alternative: Effective education is information must be l / I mmmmm .r <it ive are about to see mfironnient has reached iodation ro USE? s that the q uantity of !. but the second law lot. Water is nature's water sooner or later, r water for safe reuse. 1 today’s advanced ^stem and introduced lat nature does not ly. toxic, may remain in :ern becomes: Even if able water is the same EP OUR WATERS d more people means asing use and misuse [uality. To avoid the not enough water, no ur. The ways in which t change. iwater Foundation *ss is essential: to • education, and to a three^ep solution management of a scarce and important resource. " -MiUard Wayne Hall. Missouri River Basin Commission TO GENERATE INFORMATION Before we can change what we are doing, we must determine may also rake. answer many questions, but itmay also raise many new ones. a^nd continually updated clTht sl"9 watercrisis, to choose intelligent and effective ways to respond and to keep pace with new developments. TO FACILITATE EDUCATION Chan»l T "n O". water use wtZliolp '“r 'he sharing ofm oration For information to help in effecting change It The purpose of educational programs, protects and publications is to gel the Information to the appropriate people in a factual and understandable way. Most changes telll not occur until people are made aware of a ^nation and the need for change. This is the point at which educational programs must begin, starting with the basic facts progressing through the complexities of our water issues, and arriving at alternatives and solutions. Effective education is not just presenting information. New information must be understood and used as well. mmm -I c Wi/ TO MOTIVATE ACTION slTd'^T'' '“"'er Issues, they nee I change. What arcneeded then are incentives to trigger action. lir'"^ “ decreasing. Water is life. Without usable there h! fh" ^'ronger single Incentive canthere be than the preservation of life? People must be convinced that the water crisis is affecting g OW. We must provide the incentives — NOW. The Freshwater Foundation builds its nrooram« around these three stated factors which Irfug abo„: informal '^‘^search to generate new nformation. It supports programs and projects to facilitate education. And. most important, it ieeks to provide motivations for people to act — NOW. .'TTr ' - lx A, t V tw,, ; ;a» •Va. '* age of h’..f ss/on '■ '. '*• r';'. '-v ^ E,-'--V'.- :-.l •; . .V ’: V iii V )out water issues, they d for change. What are iction .r -i s life. Without usable er single incentive can i'ater crisis is affecting - NOW. People must ? incentives — NOW. K'.vV ilds its programs which bring about ch to generate new is» and projects to portant. it seeks to let - NOW. J i i the Foundation: h»;ij{nntna \ I. > L ir. i.ffU rr%- *^rMr FTi f f ^ - ik \ — Ti « :rprr\ f . M iVi ♦>' % *\ ................ - ’K -i................. a, .,^ -Vvt.. -K.V : ....................... .Uic. Tk. ...... . . . > o»* . .1 ' ' •, *v, , * *” ' *;• I %\ ^ Tj. V.*V“' * V** ‘•'V, .... . -V *1*V. .1.... . '4,^ ■•.,.< ■ • <.. Jf--. •- •••• •••’" !■.»:! >^•tt . t;,>r.;•<>=•• y ffo* t*>i;smTe.':r 'jf the ./•i;.e!Mf-. •/ '^Me n vtnr,e3- j »*, ..i. v,.,', » n OK.UK !,•.....« -Jaw,^ n» ^Vi ft ?fii> ^ *”'** ^ vc-gtr Ut. %, -r>v tA'Vtjne. t rr.un-mii'vr aola: dr^ani i/ :h r.^fc L’o^:—.fcs - vrw^}^ n he '-riivsi-, of rtlif/* !’H iv1r ’:;»e. "t v-c -n.-'t?'. bvtfr: o' negern*. ivs >*::•••:;. n^. F*.s.y*.- ;-r msrujiv ii-r.-^. {» jaasof :; A< .viiijQi o firgnaes. > ::: -m,.. "ref:.«2t-!>;u,t.pi3.r^.s«rch • •u!;udr;-’ ’.--'zarH t Mrrwrr,:.. .-rd:::.-: aiit 3rii*.:e.d ?tdii ai.c teaera Turr -Trret: ?,:£•.J: tri c t:f -!efr..v=:-r v.-a.-rssa- ’T: ».£'£p ■'U' c.ai‘3T ii ';.d •rr.L i r*“rv;dTv iTTSHmui :c ihe *■ .u'-aa ’.''! tv ’a ^ rr*• "•.'•!• v-*s-idm. rramiric 0*1: !he ;::-.i-.Tr-r.a:.-:: r vf.cdr.r*u ne?nv;aiir an; :te ,*Tja‘’ tviai'.w :■ v.n r«-. rr-^fr,.vdi-r »^u!.;. ' u. ‘ '>'.a■• ""id;::as> wa- u rasii S4nilb:o V!.ar'.-. . I. •■ :0. iS-iar'aiat;ri r;..iC:-f; ,r..'’ -V tAMf";, :..i ' A.* *••• n*. * n. ^ ' Ni. *% S ^r. ;^»u. r • •• V ^ -s. * ‘1 • ^ •; >- * r* »♦'t’T - * \ tv ’■•... M \ , <1 ^rv^fv it ■ ir^ I-}'.- & Wendell Andersott ant To acquaint the gen hundreds of speech 1969-1970. includi Earth Day observan Numerous televisior word on the propost for Freshwater ” in U.N.C.L.E.." acted on the telethon ir Anderson, swim me Wizard.” and dozen; Thousands of peoi Famous names all endorsing the project the concept. If the Institute was t conceptual support sources. With this in initiated. Dozens of briefed: presidential < the Senate, the Aton of the Interior, tht countless others. At the state level. m< were personally cont. « y-xred in ‘-^'.rmnq JttMf -r. <-.*r.Miir i'lir.ttt, an^ ^hnn LMj;>armtirT -} ^ - n -vi;-.»r:r or c oie!t/T>*it tjT:: t Tr»£cir^ *n ti»*n zn^3tvsrr. 'i the 'nr.ua ir..>,hM Jmv^sty fc -cairaTr in % ccgaal. mun-Tniiitn ri'jLar aream ti tt**_ o( h-^jcn O' -”• tt iivt rati ,;ir te c :»a-: of -.'i-i* c Brjiyn;za Sni-ices :.«.£t*' i>;;x:iQ::;a %is>2a-ch cr:; .ra:::-! aii: w;e? grar:vd zz'. • ;.'a- CH:a" ‘Tr 'tesp * rrr.av, ts r« :r»^a-::. Tre:r.;n^ a'c! atM'Tu rr-.:fnv.ai€r h'd fw vxd- tr TBiM 5^ tBilkan ’> ttH ?T/s‘<Mi:'er .*. **t; u\v miT!:;; *aic lo rr‘^,-r.:at;;n t: V :r ••■, rurr ai fie ' *; t( M r.ut<iin:iiii'a»* hs n a Mrnsxiiriii Oyfc at tr.r. 'rran -^‘jncTC erf ‘ rtr»%t n .ia»iufl”i. ? ■f ‘y \T: ".Ti F ;• Permit me lo sny how deeply exciting ,md encouraging it is to leurn of your progress with the Preshwutcr liiologicut Hese.irch Poundution. / um well aware of the tremendous need and possibilities for your Foundation. Please do not hesitate to let me know whenever I may be of help. — Waller F. Nondale M3 J.1 m i < <.r. ' V i-S Wendell Anderson and Robert Vaughn To acquaint the general public with the project and its needs, hundreds of speeches were made to various groups during 1969-1970. including Dick Grays talk at Minnesota ’s first Earth Day observance in 1970. Numerous television and radio appearances helped p^lss the word on the proposed Institute, including a 14-hour'Telethon for Freshwater" in 1972. Robert Vaughn. TV’s “Man from U.N.C.L.E.. acted as master of ceremonies Appearances on the telethon included Minnesota Governor Wendell Anderson, swimmer and actor Buster Crabbe. TV’s “Mr. Wizard, and dozens of acts, groups, and individuals. Thousands of people shared the Foundation s coticern. Famous names all over the nation and the world were endorsing the project. The general public became familiar with the concept. If the Institute was to have a national/international impact, conceptual support had to come from state and national sources. With this in mind, cotitacts at the federal level were initiated. Dozens of policitians and officials were personally briefed: presidential advisers, representatives from Congress, the Senate, the Atomic Energy Commission, the Department of the Interior, the National Science Foundation, and countless others. At the state level, many legislators and major public officials were personally contacted, and all were placed on a mailing ^ 4 4 # list for the Foundation newsletter. Facets of Freshwater, which updated the happenings related to the Institute. By the end of 1972. the mailing list had grown to tiearly 3.()()() selected names throughout the country. A broad cross-section of future support was being contacted regularly as the project developed. - r-F ■ I II I liPI •t yfift mf kh4 the Inst Dr. John M. Wood During 1969-197' the Freshwater Bi( and relating the fa from several stat meetings, bringing years of experiei educational institu These sessions, for the proposec team that had Armstrong on th Construction pla these meetings. States and abroe major dedicated November. 197; Foundation-own Minnetonka. Uti was completed 1 j .It \cour<iging it is to k,nn of \escarch Foimddtion. I am h UU cs for your roundation. cr I may be of help. ” •I ts of Freshwater, which Institute. By the* c'lid of nearly 3.000 selected J cross section of future ilarly as the project r. 1 sj ;m I !fi the Institute: initiation and operation 1:.r' Dr. John M. Wood During 1969-1970, five detailed meetings were held to plan the Freshwater Biological Institute, carefully defining the goals and relating the facility and staffing to them. Over 125 experts from several states and Canada attended these one-day meetings, bringing with them an accumulation of thousands of years of experience from many of the laboratories and educational institutions throughout the world. These sessions, which included the architect and contractor for the proposed Institute, were led by part of the planning team that had recently programmed the landing of Neil Armstrong on the moon. Construction plans for the Institute were drawn as a result of these meetings, after visits to scientific facilities in the United States and abroad, and upon receipt of the Foundations first major dedicated contribution. Ground-breaking ceremonies in November, 1972. marked the beginning of construction on Foundation-owned property at Navarre. Minnesota, by Lake Minnetonka. Utilizing the "fast-track" technique, the facility was completed by May. 1974. on time and under budget. .V ^'St V While construction was progressing, the University of Minnesota was initiating its part of the task, which was to 1) staff the Institute with scientists and researchers who could work together in creating a multi-disciplinary approach to researching freshwater systems; and 2) specify equipment needed by that scientific team. The first position to be filled at ihe Institute was that of director. A worldwide search was conducted and English biochemist Dr. John M. Wood was chosen. Dr. Wood is noted for his work with the methylation of mercury, the biological process by which mercury is changed to a more toxic compound. Lead scientists, graduate students and fellows, visiting scientists, and support personnel swelled the ranks of the Institute. As the Institute grew, so did recognition and research support. The success of the Institute was assured. On December 9. 1976. three years ahead of schedule, the Freshwater Foundation gave the Freshwater Biological Institute, with its equipment and land, to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota, debt-free, with no strings attached. The gift was one of the largest ever made to the University of Minnesota. All funds raised by the Foundation had come from private citizens, corporations, and foundations — no state or federal funds. The gift of the facility to the University of Minnesota marked the end of more than eight years of the dreams and hard work of thousands of people who believed in a cause, accepted its challenge, and stayed with it to a successful conclusion. In 1978 the University of Minnesota renamed the Institute. It became the Gray Freshwater Biological Institute, in honor of Richard G. Gray. Sr., whose observations and concerns just ten years earlier had been the cornerstone of the creation of a unique, nationally renowned facility for fundamental freshwater research. mnuRiiM r« 4 HliWl »... J .It t i "I was pleased to be . and am pleased that t done Just an excellent facility." —The late Hubert h. University of Minnesota F plaque to an institute wai. when the Foundation pre Minnesota In July. 1974, the Fr doors. The dream ha through a multi-disci) same goal that is its freshwater systems in i Today, scientists from si research freshwater syst the accomplishments c scientists: Discovering princip the picture of frt significant and | environment. Training graduate ; from the United J become leaders in i Investigating what troublesome chemi( These findings may jssing. the University of f the task, which was to 1) ind researchers who could ti-disciplinary approach to snd 2) specify equipment nslitute was that of director, ed and English biochemist Dr. Wood is noted for his cury. the biological process more toxic compound. ints and fellows, visiting swelled the ranks of the id recognition and research ite was assured. irs ahead of schedule, the ie Freshwater Biological id. to the Board of Regents debt-free, with no strings r made to the University of -oundation had come from foundations — no state or icility to the University of >re than eight years of the s of people who believed in and stayed with it to a ta renamed the Institute. It igical Institute, in honor of frvations and concerns just erstone of the creation of a facility for fundamental g. November. 1972: (left )berhauser. mai/or of ov. Foundation president: Caldecott, dean of the gical Sciences. University finnesota Senator George ommissioner Robert yta Department o/ Natural I was pleased lo be able lo support Ihe Freshwater Biological Institute a«rf am ^ased that euerylhlng has worked out so welL You reXhave d^jusl an excellent Job In developing such an Important research —The tale Hubert H. Humphrey. U.S. senator from Flinnesola 4* 1 4 ^ f: ' •yr m ^ i I ••■•r t wM: "-y-W II i I ^ ^ f V A m University of Minnesota President C. Peter Magrath attaches a plaque to an Institute wall during cermonies on December 9. 1976. when the Foundation presented the facility to the University of Minnesota In July. 1974. the Freshwater Biological Institute opened its doors. The dream had finally become a reality. The Institute, through a multi-disciplinary approach, began to pursue the same goal that is its current guiding force; to understand freshwater systems in detail to help solve freshwater problems. Today, scientists from six major disciplines pool their efforts to research freshwater systems. Following are some examples of the accomplishments and current projects of the Institute scientists: I Discovering principles and techniques that have changed the picture of freshwater research and have had a significant and positive effect on the freshwater environment. B Training graduate students and postdoctoral researchers from the United States and abroad: helping them to become leaders in industry and academia. B Investigating what happens to some of humanity's most troublesome chemicals when they enter lakes and rivers. These findings may lead to new. effective ways to clean up natural waters and keep drinking water safe. I Using genetic engineering techniques to develop ways to use bacteria to break down toxic compounds in water. I Sharing findings with visiting scientists and collaborators from nearly every state and 22 countries. I Doing research aimed at turning into a resource the tremendous volume of waste from wood and paper products produced each year and released to natural waters. Publishing research papers (150 of them from 1974-1981) in national and international scientific journals. Looking for ways to use green algae to harvest valuable metals as well as clean up acid mine water. Generating major grants (34 of them from 1975-1981) which continue the work of the scientists and maintain their position at the forefront of freshwater research. Taking close looks at crucial natural enzymes, or complicated catalysts. The aim of this research is to design simpler catalysts that may do the same job as the complicated ones, only faster, cheaper, and better. Tracing what happens to mercury, selenium, and arsenic in water. This information could prevent the derivatives of these metals from causing long-term impacts which could exceed those of acid rain. These represent a few of the ways in which the Institute works to better understand freshwater systems to help solve freshwater problems...to keep our waters usable. 1*0 5:irnatm r ■ ^ r r Dr. Eckard Munck. physicist and former acting director of the Institute With the Grav Fr 1974 and donated Freshwater Foum: assure ‘ contiriuinc information regard the freshwau?! woi The onginai Artie Foundation had li.s ln.stitute 1) to hi MinncstJta. 3) to ei dispo.se of monie.s threj ’ purposes. In accordance wit had essentially roi Directors of the F( and bi'come a rel mission seenn ’d to But was it? The Directors said VVhile working to a and its progiani>. awareness of the treshvvater prohlei Foundation hecam In 1977. neu Arti Roarei of Directors the ev'or grow ing c The nevy .Arficl«*v ,i 1 C«M>t!liiU' tr. su 2 (uMu>Mfe fumfv 'n akr as well a puNu‘ benefit". I water safe. ques to develop ways to compounds in water, entists and collaborators o untries. ng into a resource the from wood and paper jnd released to natural •f them from 1974-1981) itific journals, ilgae to harvest valuable line water. them from 1975-1981) entists and maintain their ater research. natural enzymes, or this research is to design the same job as the eaper, and better, selenium, and arsenic in event the derivatives of rm impacts which could ways in which the derstand freshwater r problems... to keep rfing director of the Institute »'k li- k-C; c • ^ the Foundation: a rededication With the Grav F-roshwaior B ological Institute C(>mpleted in 1074 aiu! tionati'd to tiie Universitv of Minnesota in 107b. the F-reshwatci F-ounciation had attained its initial obiective: to as.sure ’'continuing re.searc.li. training, and di.s.sernination of information regarding freshwater and the food chain related to the freshwater world ” The original Articles of Incorporation of the Freshwater Foundation had lusted four purpo.ses. all directiy related to the Institute: 1) to build it; 2! to give it to the Universitv of Minnesota. .3) to continue to support it. and 4) to receive and dispose of monies in wavs appropriate to carry out the first three purposes. In acronldiice with these .Articles, bv 1^70 the Foundation had essentialk completed its original charge The Board of Directors of tiiv f-oundation could have rested on its laurels and become a relatively passive organization The onqma mission seemed to be fulfilled. Rut w'as it? The Directors .said no WM.. working l„ .rluin Ihn orig.nal g.vil Mnrling ,hr aw. iuK,r o( ihc „rgo„,.r, hrorulih. and ol ,r,„ ro.hlv.iu., irrohlom. The nood fn, a „ow i.r. ,,. fnr Iho l-oundation became clear In 1077^ .rou Adu to. « l„<.,rrp..ra„.i„ w,.. pus.,.,I hv ,h,. 2 fInnds „ „,,pp„r, ,, . , scak\ as av r<>v4iAr K i i ^ olohai pubk bo.n,.|ir ‘ ''I'l-rirous 'I,,, I 3 Di.stribuie scientific information to the public to increase its understanding of current and future needs in the fresliwater world. Work to bring together the lay public, the academic worid. and thu' political and business communities to respond to common problems with compatible solutions for the benefit of all humanity. Undei iFu*s( neu Articles of Incorporation, the f reshu ater Foundation frtdai continues as the major coordinator for prf>prams to facilitate education and motivate ai tion as uell as a major contributor to programs which g«*neiate information through research. m A 'm -WV. % > • The rededicated Freshw generate information. ii and selected research it Examples of such progi ■ Through a program found and identified green algae, which hope for ridding lal become obvious fh exist. ■ The Foundation was about the impacts o instigated to help tra sensitive lakes. The i valuable in learning I I A Lake Minnetonka happens chemically a in better lake manat predictions regarding 41^ V I DUEL (for Dutch ELn disease to seek an effect the Institute. State Ur Montana State Univer control, a natural bade protects the tree from d Tests are under way on F an air well, which collei and condensing it. This c and providing drinking scarce. A research project at a m purify drinking water. Tl water purification througl effort to reduce the poss causing compounds. on to the public to inaeasc its ] and future needs in the ly public, the academic world, ss communities to respond to ompatible solutions for the of Incorporation, tibe continues as the major iacllitatc education and a major contributor to information through wx/cu.sc’rf knowicciqc fuwc shown us how wc htwe '>t‘Wt/7//dc 0/ present ,wd[mtenti.il w.iter problems the United St.ites ,tnd the world. Hicthird 0. Cnnif, Si„ ciuiirnum nnd founder, f reshnuiter round,ition and saleced ..a.h In Examples of such programs to dale include Ihe following: ■ Through a program funded in part by the Foundation ro u found and idenhfled a nalural amibiohe. maL bt ^pe^'roThfo " green algae, which hills other algae near it The .iT. „ hope for ridding lakes of periodic X bfolms T'''t ? become obvious that other potentially valuable algal anhbTohcs ■ The Foundation was one ol the first groups to become concerned about the impacts of acid rain. A precipitation qualily study was “ flakes •Th''“M “Id- S uable in fon s'lll l«ing gathered, will likely be valuable n learning how to minimise acid rain s impact on lakL hsi’.^ Minnetonka study Is aimed at better understa.tding what In hrtto ‘'i ^’“logically to lakes. Findings should result m better lake management techniques. They should also yield predictions regarding longevity and impact of toxic compounds. M W J DUEL (for Dutch ELm) brought together experts on Dutch elm disease to seek an effective control for it. Three vears of research at the Institute. State University of New York at Syracuse, and Montana State University at Bo/eman led to a revolutionary control, a natural bacterium that kills the Dutch elm fungus and protects the tree from disease. Tests are under way on Foundation properly on an invention called an air well, which collects water by taking moisture from the air and condensing it. This device may prove useful for irrigating crops and providing drinking water where rainfall or surface water is scarce. A research project at a major U.S. city should lead to safer ways to purify drinking water. The project explored alternate methods for water purification through the use of chlorine-based products in an effort to reduce Ihe possible formation of carcinogenic or cancer- causing compounds. Dr Richard I lanbon (rufht). current director of the Institute, u-ith a visiting professor I'oiindation Hoard at work \t p 4( f f i Institute and ionndation staff members with original MMR 1 liese are a f<*w exampU-s of (ho Foundations efforts to generate new lnformati<ni (hrongh research. Ft; ■Sir i'* »• f t the Soch Foundation Board of C Governor Al Quie at th IVflter /^u-areness The Freshwater F information, facilitati to act are coordina Foundation, formed The Society coordin who want to be invo open to everyone. The impact of the S five years ranges fror arc the following: ■ Organized the M 1979. The year-1 state agencies anc precious resource B Coordinated a st which involved 2 million people. ■ Sponsored four n The first directed The second focu: health. It was the address the health The third develop and public sectors and attitudes neo supplies. The fourth analyz environmental rar Great Lakes to s other regions. i VVroie and distril brochure, which to ivn us how we fuwc nlailLU Wiilcr problems in ; rrcshuuUcr t'ouiulntion a7% the Society ♦ » I ' S ' ‘ k . ri Foundation Board of Directors and Society staff with Minnesota Goeernor Al Quie at the proclamation of the Minnesota Year of Water /Atcareness The Freshwater Foundation's efforts in distributing information, facilitating education, and motivating the public to act are coordinated by the Society of the Freshwater Foundation, formed in January. 1978. The Society coordinates the efforts and energies of people who want to be involved in freshwater issues. Membership is open to everyone. The impact of the Society s accomplishments over the past five years ranges from local to international. Some examples are the following: ■ Organized the Minnesota Year of Water Awareness in 1979. The year-long program coordinated efforts of 22 state agencies and organizatiotis in focusing attention on a precious resource people take for granted. ■ Coordinated a statewide “Wetlands Awareness Week." which involved 35 organizations and reached almost a million people. B Sponsored four national conferences: The first directed public attention to water. The second focused allention on a critical water issue: health. It was the first conference held in the Midwest to address the health effects of water pollution. The third developed a process be which both the private and public sectors could prepare lor the changes In use suppliesnecessary lor managing our limited water The fourth analyced the political, legal, economic ami ^.vironmental ranrificatlons of diverting water from the other regt:. ■ Wrote and distributed 25.tHK) copies of a shoreline brochure, which told what people who live near lakes cm "The maintenance of our freshwater supplies needs the support of a well- informed general public, and the Freshwater Society is the only organization which offers thb opportunity." —Dr. Joseph T. Ling, vice president. 3M Company The Society develops impartial programs from the information generated through research to facilitate education in an attempt to motivate people to act — the three-step process necessary for change to occur. Category ....... do to maintain a lake ’s water quality. Helped plan water awareness projects in other states and Canada. Provided information and perspective for three television documentaries, two local and one national, aired in 1980: WTCN-TV’s “A Hard. Hard Rain." WCCO-TV’s “The Quiet Crisis." and public television's NOVA segment “The Water Crisis." which reached an estimated seven million viewers. Also provided similar help to Boston TV station WNAC. Provides audio-visual programs on water issues. Helps groups produce radio and television programs and conferences. Writes or helps write numerous features for magazines and newspapers. Distributes Facets of Freshwater, an in-house newsletter published quarterly as an update of Foundation and Institute activities. Publishes the annual Journal of Freshwater for members of the Society. Written for the lay reader, it analyzes freshwater problems and solutions, and encourages appreciation of the freshwater environment. Provides ongoing assistance in setting government policy on state, regional, and national levels. Provides speakers for organizations throughout the country. Conducts hundreds of public tours of the Institute, personally acquainting thousands of people with the Foundation and its programs. Responds to hundreds of individual calls and letters each year requesting help or sharing concerns about water. the Founds Monies Receive Contributions (unrestricted use) Contributions (restricted Membership Interest Miscellaneous DOI / Total dollars contribute by the Freshwater $4,281.2 ‘beginning with the dona Total dollars contribute by the Freshwater $494.52 Historically, the Fresf catalyst, bringing toge issues of mutual intere fBW ir-n:.:":.;: -. ' : a ,v. mmMM Iter Society is the onto y" 1 Company '9 " jr quality. ss projects in other states and •erspective for three television d one national, aired in 1980: rd Rain. * WCCO-TV’s “The (Vision’s NOVA segment “The (d an estimated seven million lar help to Boston TV station ams on water issues. I and television programs and >us features for magazines and •ater. an in-house newsletter update of Foundation and i/ of Freshwater for members the lay reader, it analyzes solutions, and encourages er environment. in setting government policy nal levels. janizations throughout the blic tours of the institute. Lisands of people with the 5. fividual calls and letters each ng concerns about water. tial programs from the gh research to facilitate lotivate people to act — »ary for change to occur. ri. m m the Foundation: financial review Monies Received 1969-1981 Category Amount Percent Contributions $4,545,456 70.90 (unrestricted use) Contributions (restricted use)1.442.693 22.51 Membership 184.146 2.87 Interest 177.798 2.77 Miscellaneous 60.942 0.95 Monies Spent 1969-1981 Percent Amount Category 67.23 $4,281,225 Grants to University of Minnesota/ Gray Freshwater Biological Institute (including building) 10.15 646.082 Other Research Grants 7.77 494.527 Information & Education - ; i- 1.13 72.223 * . ^ ■■ Promotion A • 7.97 507,068 Administration '**•.'* 5.75 367.015 Interest Total $6,411,035.00 $6,368,140.00 Total DOLLARS CONTRIBUTED TO THE FOUNDATION SERVE AS A CATALYST TO GENERATE OTHER DOLLARS Two examples: Gray Freshwater Biological Institute (1976-1981)* Total dollars contributed to the Institute by the Freshwater Foundation Total dollars generated by the Institute from other sources Funding comparison $4,281,225 $5,147,227 Every $1.00 contributed by the Foundation was matched by $1.28 from other sources. ‘beginning with the donation of the Institute to the University of Miniiesotd Society of the Freshwater Foundation (1977-1981) Total dollars contributed to the Society by the Freshwater Foundation Total dollars generated by the Society from other sources Funding comparison $494,527 $606,088 Every $1.00 contributed by the Foundation was matched by $1.22 from other sources. Historically, the Freshwater Foundation has served as a catalyst, bringing together the necessary forces to address issues of mutual interest. Projects funded by the Foundation “Working together to keep our waters usable. often receive additional funds from other sources. This “joint- effort” approach assures maximum return from each dollar invested. f. The Freshwater F original goals, accomplishments The next decade Because ... ... International w of water, are having reachc ... The major effc require multi-( ... It is essential tc “team effort”; We think it's TIM Because... ... The Freshwa “keeping our i ... It serves as a community ar ... It continues . generate infoi people to act; We think we CA! liversity of Minnesota/ i/ater Biological Institute Jilding) rch Grants & Education on imparison ted by the Foundation '8 from other sources. Dmparison ted by the Foundation !2 from other sources. ther sources. This “joint- return from each dollar r ■ I ■f <\ .r tV '-H' Fountainhead: the need Because... The Freshwater Foundation has been successful in meeting its original goals, and its Directors are proud of these accomplishments. But we realize that the work has just begun. The next decade is crucial — .. It will require an intense, coordinated effort involving many disciplines and all people working together to; Because... International water issues, as a result of overuse and misuse of water, are now recognized by most organizations as having reached crisis proportions: The major efforts necessary to keep our waters usable will require multi-disciplinary responses; ... It is essential to have everyone working together in a global “team effort"; We think it's TIME to do something — now —• Keep pace with rapid developments in scientific processes, theories, and equipment: — Predict potential impacts on water supplies; — Develop alternative methods for using water supplies; — Determine priorities for water use; — Consider the impacts of water redistribution; — Discover natural interrelationships necessary to maintain the biological balance needed in water systems; — Underwrite research to clean up unnatural manmade materials: and Because... ... The Freshwater Foundation has as its primary goal "keeping our waters usable"; ... It serves as a catalyst — a bridge between the scientific community and the user public; ...It continues as a major coordinator for programs to generate information, facilitate education, and motivate people to act; We think we CAN do something ~ now -- Establish alternate methods of water management and quality maintenance; 0 Monitor water supplies for potential breakdowns of the natural system: We think we MUST combine forces ■now The Freshwater Foundation proposes Fountainhead ... a bold plan to intercept the water crisis: ... an intense five-year multi-disciplinary effort to seek basic solutions — scientific and social — to freshwater use and misuse; and ... a plan to bring the efforts of people together to implement the solutions. >-55r.'V Y- ; iTl 1 I 0i ■ w FOUNTAINHEAD to keep our waters Fountainhead is a nev. major freshwater pre research, facilities, ar Foundation during th The Fountainhead p consists of efforts to 1 the other part involve: For both groups, ince to work together. The incentives. For the scientific cor access to the latest spe to collaborate with program proposes to 1. Updating special techniques, theorie biological genetic « chemical reactions . 2. Developing a majo will bring scientists . seek solutions to w< 3. Providing the worki and support the vis For the user public. 1 promote change is ur only when the user choices, and consequ Fountainhead prograr the change process bj 1. Initiating and cooi workshops to gatht 2. Generating comi publications — to audience; . > n- \- Jfi FOUNTAINHI^D is a primary source . . . to keep our waters usable. Fountainhead is a new. $7 million, five-year program to attack major freshwater problems by updating and expanding the research, facilities, and programs initiated by the Freshwater Foundation during the past 14 years. The Fountainhead program is a two-part plan. One part consists of efforts to bring the scientific community together; the other part involves efforts to bring the user public together. For both groups, incentives are needed to encourage people to work together. The Fountainhead program provides these incentives. For the scientific community, the main incentives include access to the latest specialized equipment, and the opportunity to collaborate with peers. Therefore, the Fountainhead program proposes to support the scientific community by: 1. Updating specialized equipment to support new techniques, theories, and procedures in areas that include biological genetic engineering and the analysis of toxic chemical reactions and interactions: 2. Developing a major scientific summer study program that will bring scientists and students together from all areas to seek solutions to worldwide water concerns: 3. Providing the working and living space necessary to attract and support the visiting scientific community. For the user public, the main incentive to work together to promote change is understanding. As with the energy crisis, only when the user public fully understands the issues, choices, and consequences will change occur. Therefore, the Fountainhead program proposes to involve the user public in the change process by: 1. Initiating and coordinating a series of conferences and workshops to gather needed information; 2. Generating communication vehicles — films and publications — to distribute new information to a mass audience; undersltind U. That is the purpose of research. We .ire Indebted to the rreshiviiter Foundation ,ind to the Freshiv.iter Societif for their efforts on our beh.it f." —C. Peter Nugruth. president. University of Ninncsot.1 3. Organizing action programs designed to involve people in changes necessary for proper water use. The impact will be global. The service to humanity will be immeasurable. The need is now. The probletns won ’t waif. If we don ’t address these problems, who will? The Foundation has the desire, the will, the base, and the credibility. We are convinced that the Fountainhead program can do what must be done. The sum total of all parts and efforts — Tangible and intangible — past, present, and future — Will serve as an ongoing resource ... A primary source ... A continual fountainhead. Fountain :-J i - a < 7 Sodetif for their efforts on •4 Ninnesotfi gned to involve people in Iter use. rvice to humanity will be ie problems won’t wait. If vho will? The Foundation nd the credibility. We are ogram can do what must sent, and future — Fountainhead: the specifics : V I-unds generated through the Fountainhead program will be allocated to nine specific categories. All dollar figures represent total costs, including inflation allowance, for a five-year period from 1982 to 1987 (All figures represent thousands of dollars) Categories $Totals 1.Expanding and updating equipment 845 2.Gathering information for reference and storage 249 3.Encouraging scientific teamwork 1150 4.Supplying space to work and live 2000 5.Underwriting special research 337 6.Publishing appropriate information 428 7.Initiating special projects 465 8.Promoting conferences and workshops 451 9.Coordinating activities: Foundation (general)762 Fountainhead (program)173 Contingency 140 GRAND TOTAL $7000 Category 1: EXPANDING AND UPDATING EQUIPMENT Total: $845,000 Nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer Essential for molecular bioloqical research. The present NMR at the rtiiraivniTt »I (•»!§] iXtTi I w Dr. mchard Hanson diroclor. Gray Froshwater Biological Inslllnic Category 2: GATHERING INFORMATION FOR REFERENCE AND STORAGE Total: $249,000 To enhance the ongoing library system to better service the expected mHux of visiting scientists and students. Includes computer data base searching costs and interface with libraries at other institutions. Category 3: ENCOURAGING SCIENTIFIC TEAMWORK Total: $1.150.000 Summer study fellowships An important element in establishing an ongoing scientific summer study program is to provide tuition, travel, per diem, and supplies for summer graduate students attending the Gray Freshwater Biological Institute. Total: $158,000 Visiting scientists To attract renowned scientists as visitors both on a two-year rotating basis and as faculty for the scientific summer study program Total* $159.1 -----I III Internships The new ideas, fresh outlooks, and varied backgrounds of recent Ph.D. graduates are needed to enhance and complement research programs. Sufficient work space is provided in each of the 18 laboratories at the Institute to accommodate a total of 50 interns, for varying periods of time on a rotating basis. Total: $833,000 Category 4: SUPPLYING SPACE TO WORK AND LIVE Total: $2,000,000 To have a comprehensive scientific summer study program, and to accommodate visiting scientists and interns, it is necessary to have adequate space to work and live. The location of the Institute and available facilities restrict the potential of these programs. Additional facilities should be made available to meet these needs. I Jr .t Tv 4 mmm A ... S0--%*0^ S' ,* .;a '^ - J V '' V 'THT'''Ji'‘ ■-. ^ JS. '' > ' • \^ \ N^ . V.. ' W>ifn ft ,f/ntfr , Uh ill fhthtf^tl ffiff, ff*>rJ /^ ir/s f.:,^ W>^ lifUth nfifl W.W.lfirtf If Ihf fi ,tft u, -^fi,r juhffi^ ,t\ thf'if h.itJC \t nn il u\ Uff .ill mir^l h^ Iff AIhrtI II (juh' fiffOf fn^tf \f.ih f,f //.t ( fifc'f|nry j nNr>» HWHiriNf, (jAiEf.HfAHUi JfjUl S337.000 Model «tudy of lafce« A "m,r,ft't.i>r.% /t> ,'i, '/ warryr'. . *' .r c^TStand hov; >• lo/t* ‘ ifV d.siTpIincs will (A»rr;r '<T'.'{"{y^t^ric. -sr.- '<''.r.o»ogjcal c.ornp'/fit'fif-, 7r,t' -i/,n, a ", >-vr>y.-v "vx>"-. ’r ^ -j>r "ji ifyzilKi to any bo'ly of {ft'\*. fo'^, '//, Aerial lake monit//rioq. r.o^/fk^>red VASA It IS [yOS'->:0j<^ "O ' r,.' '. f~..'.<i’. ‘,!" x_ SiO.nT.XJU5> fO ana!>y«? ar,o' r i;/.V‘,ro ",^-; r.f'.»'i t .,-.- rnar.> t-rr.es rn^/re eff.r e-.f >j.".onrc '. s.-.r^-ctcr, w:th the Nationai A«^ro' a,*rs a"; At-.r nrrsr.r.f i.-,c V'soI M;r,neso?a s rf"',o*ir 'c >ino''>'or^; . il r...^ iCK-ra. process by corr,b.--"i e/sv-. \ii p* -.-..srac*.c xiih conternporar;. 5,s e'"<'. ,;..s ■'^.■*r:ci.rtS Ttra S12;; ‘Xri Urban storm water mnnaen^sfas Aioca..zeo 'sm- .^ir ,.i-e r*0’*:', ■ir-ti-r t: fti-ri'—.■"c'f?e effects o. siorrr, .-. stir i;-.* t .2*r - .~«-r -a ;.- 2 ror.troiled bocy ct rreir. .<:.',w—err :r a*i:re:ire rr:cer~. :%kners is r.t'CtS.i<;r. T::a 5:»' ,*m! Lake Minnetonka Baseiiise Asai&xs, Co:-:.r...r .■•• .'• rr ;.p-_v- V.r;-e^:r^a r 1979 to arr.iss -c r:r 2 srcctc one :wr n' -::*re-cei perod or t'.r’c . ~v ^ c,»;rec s Tar cere’—:rir«j proper k ’sc \v • c.e> T.'Ch 5*-^. PUUlSHINy; \t>'S09'SU^ IM OK'! UlON jcal S42S I V ^ ^ ‘v*.*! ;voev; X ctv\.vti*v .'V'-wH: ccciioe n* rr:cGems tt'iM’t s* V.N, X'.\v ^ a oci*ci*ue .X! -f ri^oKrjocrs and *‘V.M’V ',V\\0>. ••vS' ,t> W\W ■ I S- vs.A- O ,V ,voXxv antuuJv :r So^oes. , -v Csn V ,♦■ V .NVvvCs^ l'v^■> !'*«v'»V'ix X'ciXf arc. TvsT' *»ater sV -wK sv -.^- xxxxv w ^'v ve> ^v»»v cr 2! ^'SS\fN s’* *X' Kv ^ ^ K.»% V ,»V \ ssitv.vN“ s>Nv ,xvc»e arc scrrsaiire i\'\ X. ,*sNV. • <^UiV* N.N. W l»*v v'* *KH*\svk .Nvx.X(sx . ^’\ak'N N *‘’C'?cvx~ac. "sS. Vxssx » V'X, V Xi., >v •vS - i ■ f . :■ : -1..I t L -. ?s» '^1 M •:m N. r>1 V' •. I*'; i ;} (’S' ! i\n Category 7: INITIATING SPI Certain important ] development. The initiate such projec ■ Establishment network, a cei industry, and pt planning and m. ■ Development of water-related qu ■ Catalyst or start organizations co ■ Production of m water issues. Category 8: PROMOTING CC WORKSHOPS It is crucial to bring and the policy-mal process. ■ Sponsorship of b regional water isj B Production and < conferences, thui B Workshops to pi These workshop: focus on issues tc Category 9: COORDINATING ACTIVITIES Foundation and S< Administrative mana Society membership of property. Represe Fountainhead pro) Literature, materials, per year. Part-time consulting : per year. Contingency Represents 2% of go. 7 /// t y/^/K t n ‘f^sfvyjTf V. >r,d«Ts:and "^-■, *: r<r5r» c^sctplines r t v,*< - rr. >-.-: *.?cnrio«ogical -i: -i *.<; !o any d Jy# H.A.S A ^''-'.^v^'cc'.i: ^chaiacves to ' T.f'X'i ' x.~ ■^'Zfj'.acues arc -trrc C -.•'.c^ri-x- the XT-rr.r L'.•.crsjty of > ii ■‘'""-ic Tts 5c«=Cjs- process •;;*i0 * ■: i'i T .ni: 5I23.(» **5"*-P-es with r.-ir. n Oe*vr~.re ttve ejects i-r :r a c^-.joiied <:r-i ;re rr'iCHTTi Owtme TS ts it'd r 1^79 to -'•‘f'ar period i:t CKn**—'.rirc proper 11 ' roii S42S, -arvOkHK .t rr:^ms ■xiT :nv5e'*r rucacaccr* and r ' .jiK. '■.vo.'Siv .V ss-vs. ■tx a*c riS* •»:er. "% X-vwns .arvoKk' or al IT vv cwf >-v.* scraclate v'»v«>*v *>iT snivnts:. Category 7: INITIATING SPECIAL PROJECTS Total: $465,000 Certain important programs require special attention and care in their development. The Foundation is the appropriate impartial catalyst to initiate such projects. ■ Establishment of a national computerized water information network, a cental source providing information to business, indusby. and policy-makers on water issues to assist in long-range planning and management related to water concerns. ■ Development of a regional center, a place to go for responses to any water-related questions. ■ Catalyst or startup programs to help other states, agencies, and organizations coordinate needed programs to avoid duplication. Production of movies for national distribution that address specific water issues. Category 8: PROMOTING CONFERENCES AND WORKSHOPS Total: $451,000 It Is crucial to bring together the scientific community, the user public. and the policy-makers to identify and initiate the problem solution process. ■ Sponsorship of biennial national conferences to address specific or regional water issues of concern to the general public. ■ Production and distribution of full written reports of these national conferences, thus expanding each conference ’s impact. ■ Workshops to precede every conference, movie, or publication. These workshops serve to sort out ideas, establish priorities, and focus on issues to ensure a successful, coordinated effort. Total: $1,075,000 Category 9: COORDINATING FOUNDATION ACTIVITIES Foundation and Society Administrative management of Foundation activities, management of Society membership activities, contracts for services, and maintenance of property. Represents 10.8% of goal or $151,000 per year. Fountainhead project Literature, materials, and travel. Represents 0.54% of goal or $7,600 per year. Part-time consulting support. Represents 1.93% of goal or $27,000 per year. Contingency Represents 2% of goal. % feHi ► ii J.. 'J4.a /C m mm Founts y y 9 ^ Fountainhead: budget and cash flow FOUNTAINHEAD BUDGET AND CASH FLOW (All figures include a 10% annual inflation allowance) Categories 81 <82 (All figures represent thousands of dollars) 82 83 83-84 84-85 85-86 86-87 TOTALS 1. Expanding and updating equipment 165 250 170 130 130 —845 2. Gathering information for reference and storage 17 40 42 46 50 54 249 3. Encouraging scientific teamwork 186 208 229 250 277 1150 4. Supplying space to work and live —500 500 —— 5. Underwriting special research 118 89 90 20 20 —337 6. Publishing appropriate information 30 64 73 80 86 95 428 7. Initiating special projects —125 65 80 115 80 465 8. Promoting conferences and workshops 9. Coordinating activities: 27 82 70 92 80 100 451 Foundation (general)15 127 138 149 160 173 762 Fountainhead (program)13 45 50 55 5 5 173 Contingency —20 30 30 30 30 140 GRAND TOTALS 385 1528 1936 1411 926 814 7000 Founds i IttS TOTALS Foundation; legal certificates the organization requesting funds Na:a;rNC;ja‘'5535l R-O- corporation with full tax deductibility Foundation is a non-profit Minnesota ^ ___’ ——• ilur moamea; dated Oct5>er 2o!*19^0: and section 509 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code. Tax-Exempt Certificates cxCTincATE or kximpt sTAnit - ixempt ouAmzA^iBir J5J Ks'SIiSIm’. r* "*h "»“ia<loo M»se lumepersonal property to be used solely and exclusively S that organSiin ° purchases, rentals and leases of tangible r n Minneaoolis, Minnesota 551»08 L I Date Issued September 12, 196? This certificate is valid until revoked bv the Miiinesota Department of Taxation. RUFUS T.* ^r/CTPANi Commissioner of Taxatii a#v ^ -----------------------------------------------------_______________i). S, MltND’iHL, Director Sales and Use Tax Division 'aV a ' 5?i Internal Ravanua Sarviea •«* f*P<V r*f*r to; MmiMTU, Ifif 5M03 Purpotat Addroao In^irio* and PiU Rotiims with Oiairict Olrocfot ol Inlomol Rovonuai Ohariiailup •i. tea. itteaifu Form 990*A Raquirad: Accounting Period Ending: On the basis of your slated purposes and the understandinq that your operations will continue ua evidenced to date or will conform to those proposed in your ruling application, we hove concluded that you are exempt from Federal income tax as an organization desaibed in section 501(c)(3) of tfie Infernal Revenue Code. I Cash: Chxvsji rt Kou ’XMr:on wt;'!d b '^0 N.Ho:rt’. M;n: 2 Pledge: Irnr'r'tcJ or c> 3. Gifts-in-kind: .A Fou’vofci' or 4 Real estate: Git: estate 5 Life insurance: E Donors who i ■‘Frtonas of Fre print of the p, Kotibd. One of Mr. Kouba js contribution t ongtnal pomtii Freshwater Sio Ways to give nuioi htifjMl on our qunlitij of life. A fontrihution to this oraani/ !^ KljH stnt',,! rontrihiition to our roilertiue future." ^ A GUIDE FOR DONORS TO FOUNTAINHEAD 1 Cash; Cht*ck>- rr.av bv made pavabic to Freshwater FouttdaRon and be sent to Shadewood Road. Box *^(V Navarre. Minnesota. 55o^d 2. Pledge: lmmed:ate o" delayed payment, one-time paernerit. or an extended pavment schedule 3. Gilts-in-kind; .Ar asset which mac be used by the Kv'^undaRon or which mac be converted to cash 4 Real estate: Gifts of real estate or future interest in rea’ estate 5. Lilc insurance; Bv as.sen;ne ownership to the Freshwater Donors who contribute SI 000 or more become Frtenus of Freshwater * and receive a limited edition print of the painting Water Is Life." bv Leslie y Koubu One of the nation s foremost wildlife artists. r Kouba agreed to paint the picture as his conmbunon to the Freshwater Foundation The *»numal painting hangs i„ the lobbv of the G.av Freshwat<?r Sioiogical Institute. «• 4 (luster (.. Unci prcsirleni and CF..O.. horthwest ^incorporation(Bana^ f ounrl^tion. the donor receives an immediate incomet riedaction of its present value and eliminates the proceed^ of tfie policy from his her estate. (y Devises: A devise (a gift by will) of real or personal property to the Freshwater Foundation may not be subiected to state taxes. OPTIONS FOR THE USE OF A GIFT: I Unrestricted gift: The donor leaves the disbursement of the gift to the discretion of the Foundation's Distribution Committee 2 Restricted gift: Donors may specify a panicular project or restricted field of interest, such as research, information conferences, or education The Distribution Committee then assigns the funds for appropriate expenditure. 3 Designated gift: Donors may specify a project or item to be tunded The Distribution Commitree ensures that the grants are used as the donor intends 4 Matching gift: Donors may specify that a contribufion be miatcnec. a*; or in part, by ot.ner contributions as a restricted or unrestricted pieege Eligibility for educational matching girts can ce arrangec Special deferred gift program.s may be arranged through d)e Conor s attorney and tne executive director of the Freshwater i-ouncar.on f If ill i Iff- I . ■» f I d, r-* \ K »i m the Foun The Freshwater Fc received and distr scientific research c goal: to keep our \ Dollars contributec used in generatinc amounts exceedinc careful consideratic of this trend is assu Linda Schroeder. Chris The Foundation, thre formation to better ir the current and futu Christine Olsenius. Freshwater FoundatU staff members in initi grams and projects to the Fres 'orthwest Bancorpor, V es an immediate income tax Jdnd eliminates the proceedsrate. by will) of real or personal r Foundation may not be ►E OF A GIFT: 'JT leaves the disbursement of he Foundations Distribution specify a particular project or ch as research, information. Tne Distribution Committee propnate expenditure. sy specify a project or item to Committee ensures that the intends specify that a contribution be er contributions as a restricted ility for educational matching nay be arranged through the ve director of the Freshwater 'i0UL the Foundation; today The Freshwale, Foundation, since its inception in 1968 has received and distributed over $6 million lor the support a scientific research and education programs in -he pursuit of« goal: to keep our waters usable. Il conlinues in that effort. Dollars contributed to Ihe Foundation have normallv been used In generating matching funds from other sources in amounts exceeding 100% of the original amounts. Through careful consideration of programs and projecls. continuation of this trend is assured. Linda Schroeder. Christi'.^; Olsenius. and Karen Thompson The Foundation, through its Society, distributes scientific in formation to better inform and educate the public regarding the current and future needs of freshwater in the world. Christine Olsenius. coordinator of the Society of the Freshwater Foundation, directs the efforts of other Society staff members in initiating and developing appropriate pro grams and projects to meet the public s needs. I li.' j- I JL N(i/)cy Herfert. Dick Grac*. und Joe Rossillon The Freshwater Foundation is a tax-exempt, non-profit cor poration. All powers of the Foundation are vested in and under the authority of the Board of Directors. The Board meets regularly, with an annual meeting in August. Richard G. Gray. Sr., serves as chairman of the board and president of the Foundation. Dr. Joseph P. Rossillon assists as executive director and chief operating officer. Caroline McNulK ’. Vera Frishie. and tVonrc Ketcher The Foundation staff, with offices at the Gray Freshwater Biological Institute, daily serves as a bridge between the scien tific community and the lay public. the Freshwater Foundation — sponsoring Fountainhead — “to keep our waters usable.” msm F i mM. ; ■ »-wr. ssillon ^-exempt, non-profit cor- Jation are vested in and of Directors. The Board eting in August. airman of the board and eph P. Rossillon assists as ig officer. i ice Ketcher dt the Gray Freshwater ridge between the scien- nhead — - - ^ \ ♦ df It • » ^0 The Freshwater Foundation and all that it has done. The original dream that became a reality. Fountainhead. A new dream that must become a reality — to keep our waters usable. 2™ R J'£'Srr Sn ,««2 M2 47.-R.07 ipi '.‘W.■ • : V'l ■; ' ' ;■m->e/• '^¥jm5 • -Jl- '■a I 7: Rani X nX.-- i i a-;': •.. r ■•*, . ■ .:' :'k Annual Report Issue Volume 8, No. 4/Fall, 1983 of Freshwater m k ~ j ri’ r UL ;5 i:. ,- jV; 0/1 the horizon oj the Center for the Great Lakes lie three new eihtcation programs. The Center For The Great Lakes: Meeting the Challoiges With Knowledge A $153,994.00 grant from the Northwest Area Foundation is enabling the Freshwater Society to plan and carry out three major education programs for the Center for the Great Lakes, based in Chicago. The grant will further the Freshwater Society goal of providing information to business, industry and policymakers to assist in the long range planning and management of water concerns. According to Christine Olsenius, coordinator of the Freshwater Society, the grant will provide funds to: 1. Publish a regional directory of public and private groups involved in resource management in Great Lakes states and prov inces. The directory will provide information to people interested in water and land management issues, policymaking, business, industry, and public education; 2. Publish a bimonthly regional report synthesizing and analyzing Great Lakes issues; and 3. Develop regional seminars for business executives to examine the implications of current water problems to the business community. Industry and manufacturing account for 44 percent of water used in the United States each year, and the factors which affect the cost of the water they use will affect the production of goods. Ihe Center for the Great I.akes was founded in January. 1983. with the support and planning of the Freshwater Foundation. Foundation Chairman, Richard G. Gray, Sr„ is on the center's board of directors. . X-/.. %.R- 'V .v.R.aV.- Me® Soundings Opinions from the Board Water Education: A Joint Effort The Freshwater Foundation Board of Directors is an exciting and powerful group of people, with a variety of interests and concerns which make it a strong board. I s.hare their concerns about water, and so docs an organization of which I have been a member for nearly 50 years, the Garden Club of America. The Garden Club of America has always been very committed to civic and educational projects. 1 hey are concerned about water, and are now involved in a three-year program with a focus on water. During this special focus, they are trying to do two things; help the members themselves become more aware of water issues and concerns, and help their communities become more aware of tho.se same concerns. lt*s a wonderful thing to do. The Garden Club of America represents 14,000 inlluential people all over the country who are getting organized, getting involved, and serving as leaders for others to follow. It is not necessary to be a scientist to do some good (or water. Everyone can contribute in easing a difficult situation. Work can start right at home by using less water around the house, or by thinking about fertilizer needs before houndation Hoard ,\teniher Polly Case putting it on the lawn. After the individual efforts have begun, the next step is to do what the garden club members are doing work with others in an organized way to get everyone concerned and involved. The Freshwater Society has worked closely with the Garden Club of America in planning and developing programs and educational materials. I am proud to be a lembcr ol these two organizations working as a team to help “keep our waters usable." '?»//1 Polly Case Mrs. Case has been a member of the l.ake Minnetonka (iarden Club lor nearly .SO years. She has also served on the University of Minnesota l.andseape Arboretum Hoard of Irustees sinee its founding inm*). ^ THE FRESHWATER FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS Richard G. Gray, Sr„ Chairman G«»r» T v • Sewall D. Andrews. Jr. Roger L. Baker William M. Baker Raymond D. Black William M. Bracken Dr. Thomas E. Brunelle Mrs. Herbert W. Buscher Mrs. Benton J. Case Mr. Daniel C. Chabot Henry Doerr Kingsley Foster James L. Hetland. Jr. Mrs. John O. Irvine Dr. Joseph I. Ling David r. Me Luughlin Charles M. Moos Earl H.Mosiman Mrs.William G. Phillips Dr. Dean K. Rizer Robert L, Searics Mrs. Edward R. Titcomb Thomas L. Warner Mrs. Warde F. Wheaton I® rnmmm mmm '"Co ^ m f'-, jr m :v». %• ;• mmmm n ■’ -a 'mmmmm mm ;;. .. .i ^’^■"yyj::y4yyy y: \. i!.1 ty^mwm m-,y"'- y y'': 'U'.'■ ^yy ' .m.3.-TJ 33fiaii y:y--^ t MpMM $ I f SI It 7a A h H y K begun, den th ked tnerica ms and to be a y Case c Lake She has ndscape ding in IS an iry mb on mmm f-r,-.w '-Vr ■F ■ lliilii • ,y ^ • 4 >Ub^ . ■ *1, <»-■ t ■v..:S;£:4:j'jv^1 L > IrMSaSL ”;*" I c:-:v V.:«1i i-4** •- •* • A-*?* :iSi ^ r • Vi, V V r^:. - -, :.■ J. ■ -y' •4 'y ^ uV;. yli'■ ■ vl-v;;-;;-- ! ;y.V/:'' #emyy.y::^s^s■^,iv^yy;^;y: * il‘i 'i! Av >v.- .• ;• ^ •'tl mmgssg^stofef* ittai Foundation News The Year in Review: How Fountainhead Funds Were Spent The following items show some of the exciting ways in which Fountainhead funds were committed this past fiscal year (July. 1982 - June. 1983). More than one grant was often made in each category, and this list does not include all grants made. It does, however, represent the broad range of interests and water issues addressed by Fountainhead this year. x:yv ,• -I:v / I’e T |v Fountainhead helped encourage these seven summer students: (front) Eva Tannander. Royal Institute of Technology. Stockholm. Sweden: Liz Truesdell, Mt. Holyoke College. Mas.\achusetts; (back row) Jeff Quam. St. Otaf College. Minnesota: Christine Jegerschold. Royal Institute of Technology: Michelle Peterson. Wellesley College. Massachusetts: Sonia Valdivia. Carleton College. Minnesota: and Tim Kehrli. University of Puget Sound. Washington. A new space to work and live. Expanding and Updating Equipment New NMR Users The Hormel Institute of Austin, Minnesota, and the University of Minnesota ’s department of pharmacology have been contracting for time to use the Institute ’s new nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer, bought with Fountainhead funds this year. Called simply the NMR, the apparatus has such research advantages and saves so much time that several agencies and organizations have asked to use it. Encouraging Scientific Teamwork The First Summer Interns The first Malcolm Moos Visiting Professor, Dr. Mary Mennes Allen, helped initiate another first at the Institute: its new summer internship program. With fellowships from the Foundation through Fountainhead, seven undergraduate students spent eight weeks doing research projects related to those in progress at the Institute, consulted with faculty, and shared their results and problems with their colleagues. Supplying Space to Work and Live A Dome Home Laboratory and living space in the form of a 36-foot diameter dome home was recently completed with Fountainhead funds at the Cedar Creek Research Station, 30 miles north of St. Paul, Minnesota. As part of the University of Minnesota ’s field research program, more than forty researchers can live and work at the site. The site is important because it lies in the recharge zone for aquifers providing drinking water for the Twin Cities. A,. » t:. t m ■../ ■ • -y j •Mmfepl . .•/■■• yt- : : = ;-v =•••.■■ .4-y. y-.\! ■ V. : ...•: y •- ts 4.*•• • • , luipmcnt Minnesota, innesota's have been Institute's esonance untainhead apparatus id saves so incies and it. mwork Professor, ed initiate summer oundation ergraduate ig research ress at the and shared vith their ind Live e form of a IS recently inds at the . 30 miles I innesota's than forty le site. The ics in the providing es. ;? -■ • .1 JSi msm Underwriting Special Research A Self-Study Half the United States population gets its drinking water from wells. Therefore, it is important to know how ground water is affected by farming practices. Farmers in four north-central Minnesota counties initiated a study of the impact of irrigation and cultivation on close-to-the- surface aquifers. Landowners there, concerned with seasonal high nitrate levels, are asking what effect agricultural practices have on water quality. The study is helping answer that question. Publishing Appropriate Information A Fresh Approach The annual Journal of Freshwater, expected out in mid-November, has become an increasingly colorful and focused magazine. This year two themes predominate, according to Journal Editor, Linda Schroeder: 1) Many groups of water users are accepting responsibility for water issues; initiating their own creative ways of resolving the issues. The magazine brings you their ideas and successes. 2) Our changing perceptions of water are requiring a new look at water management structures to see whether they need to be changed. The magazine presents experts' statements on the problems and supports them with case studies. Experts appearing in the magazine are: William Thomas, research attorney with the American Bar Foundation; Dr. Warren Viessman, professor and chairman of the department of environmental engineering sciences at the University ol Florida; Amelia Armitage. editor and publisher of the Heater Information News Service: Dr. John Opie, founding editor of the Environmental Review: and Dr. Les Picker, director of Project COAST and consulting editor of Current magazine. Promoting Conferences and Workshops A Working Conference A working conference will be held in December, 1983, at the University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, as part of the Red River Valley Study. The study's purpose is to test the premise that the people who can best manage a large watershed (or even an international one, as this is) are those who live in it. The premise asserts that peoples' shared common interests in the watershed can transcend their uncommon interests and problems. The conference is being held to develop proposals and elicit support for a watershed- based structure to manage water-related issues. Conference sponsors, the International Coalition for Land and Water Stewardship in the Red River Valley, hope to draw representatives from more than 75 interest groups, agencies, corporations, and foundations. Initiating Special Projects A Quicker Response A computer system, donated for the Water Information Network by the Earl Mosiman family and DCA (formerly Deferred Compensation Administrators and Stanton Associates) is now in use at the Freshwater Society. Christine Olsenius, coordinator of the Society, described its usefulness. “The Society is dealing daily with large volumes of information on water issues," she said. “What's exciting about the computer is that it will enable us to respond to requests for this information more quickly. It's going to help the Society be a 'center'for freshwater." 1 ir 1 I vw 'f • v-- ‘.r:^ ^ = t .i’- '■ A T ■; ‘.■■■A f - . V: ' .-sj •i '•V M: I t-. ■ n ~ r. * :: .' .V> • '-V.. ; V ■ -A :-A-:■ Ay. ;A: mMAkrVJ-v:..'; ■mm • : -V \ • . ■ . '/•••■. 7" ^ ■■ AV;//;-:..:; r k ’A.-. ■- •* .V! ' ■* •* ’ 3 Wiu i-'y-x V - .o.- -; v^: : = • v ^ ••• iAA:=:=":;;A'A:'77v;- -yyy-Aoyv ky-:-v M:SSmy-mmyr'- I r i V AAA.®- ■ '• 1 ( v:- Jc Sli leld in ‘ North he Red iremise : a large one, as premise 3mmon nd their develop lershed- -related national /ardship to draw interest IS, and le Water losiman Deferred Stanton eshwater r of the is. “The ilumes of ihe said, ter is that |uests for i going to shwater. imm. 'mm V.. .-• ••■. = . A-.V: V • V : m 'J-'SSSSteiiii Pwccnt of Foimtftiii* head Funds Conunitted, by Category 1. Expanding and updating equipment 2. Gathering iniormation for reference and storage 3. Encouraging scientific teamwork 4. Supplying spaee to work and live 5. Underwriting special research 6. Publishing appropriate information 7. Initiating special projects 8. Promoting conferences and workshops 9. Coordinating activities: Foundation and Fountainhead Thank You! Thank you to all the individuals and organizations whose contributions helped get the Fountainhead program off to a running start. This chart shows the percent of Fountainheuti futuls commit ted in each of nine categories during fiscal year I982~SJ. The list of nine areas is at right. Fountainhead Update \ I Fountainhead is a $7 million, five-year program to attack major freshwater problems by updating and expanding the research, facilities and programs initiated by the Freshwater Foundation during the past 14 years. It was initiated July 1,1982. John Mosiman helps Xatuy Ketcher, ojfue supervisor, with the new computer. New pledges have been received from: Otto Bremer Foundation Dr. & Mrs. Thomas Brunelle Donaldson Foundation Economics Laboratory. Inc. Nash Foundation (icorge W. Neilson Foundation Northwest Area Foundation H. C. Piper (Founder-Advisor Fund) Archie D. & Bertha H. Walker Foundation Ihc Wasie Foundation C. L. Whitehill Winnetka Garden Club Pledges to date...............$1,857,158.00 '4 {W.fK "-:y ^ ■•..t . • =r -B‘ .. ■.•••••■ ; . •• V .. a.:;'" b i : -••.:Ai l .. 1" . ; . ' . .' r •• •v m0m Pass-Words Camr for i/w Gn;n Lakes PresU/en,. fornwr MuiiiMan Governor M///,«,„ G. MUUken (rivht) wuh ihek Gray, f reshwater f 'otaufation. Fiscal Year 1982-83: The Year of “Even More So In this informal interview. RUhan! G. Gray. Sr., chairman of the Fre.shwater houndation Board of Directors, reviews toundatton accomplishmetus. Foimtainhead v Jtrst year, and ne.xt years plans. 1 o summarize how the year went I would say It was a very dynamic period for the Freshwater Foundation. We went 29 steps forward and no steps backward. A verv positive year,” said Gray. ^ thr«*' happened, many of accomplishmenis saw wore cilher culminations of projects that had been in the wo^s lor a long liinc. or beginnings ol thosc Whose real value hasn’t surfaced vet I’ll tell you more about that later.” ' ”1 would say that, unlike most other organizations which have had to retrench and to pull back their staffs and projects we have been able to go ahead. .So this vt^r might be called ‘a year of more s«’. We have nrm!r*”'‘ >«ar wc began the Fountainhead work to keep our waters usable. We kicked ' -T - an interview with Dick Gray Pick Gray (eenier) points out the Institute., location to a visitor during the Open Home eelehratimt the Foundations Dth anniversary. off the program July I, 1982. It’s been one year now and all aspects of the program arc on schedule.” In 1982, the Foundation Board of directors was well aware of the risks associated with a major fundraising drive Fo minimize these risks, the board laid down two policies. The first policy was to .structure Fountainhead so that no project would begun unless the commitment was covered bv p edges or receipts. “This was necessary,” said Gray, because for all we knew, we fourth or fifth year of the program.” I he way it s worked out. we arc ahead on a rc-lative schedule. We raised nearly $2 million this first year, more than 24 percent 0 the total for the five-year program. We 1 tel very good about it.” waler'i ’’hv‘I"* “reluily lest the«Jtcrs b> lumi raising with several major prospeetive donors before launehing a fuH- scale general fund drive, (iray said Ms pob^ was strietly followed with g<^ When asked about how prospective donors received him and other Hoirrf members. Gray said, -| was surprisel!“nd pleased at our reception; our welcome 4 £ 'm "si. -d: id an71 ”"*” r ir rrr r “ke VihVn? r;.:iorrr-n~w:rr r r;j - -- a fuiid'^rivedow."“”" "“' *’"’ The year brought to fruition several projects planned for years. For instance, the Foundation sponsored the first Malcolm Moos Visiting Professorship at the Grav Freshwater Biological Institute and bough! new nuclear magnetic resonance spMUometer for research there The Foundation’s membership arm the Founi»"h“ij f«‘^«ivcd a hrw2r ,nf“"“''‘'aier Information Network and yery major force is at work • • . . That major force is the Freshwater Fou ndation. ” Environmental Health Network. The Society also distributed its first three water information brochures. It hosted a successful public open house at the Institute to celebrate the Foundation's 15th anniversary. The Foundation initiated new efforts this year, according to Gray, which may not find their true value until a few years down the road. For example, after attending a major conference on the Great Lakes in the spring oi 1982. the Foundation became the driving lorce in organising the concept of a Center lor the Great Lakes and in seeing that it got going. ^ “We also joined other foundations in a study ol water policy process in the Red Another major development was the start f h/o *1^ management plan to a.ssure Foundation’s work. comZ.?”*""" planningmmittee making specific recommendations new long term research and costs ° '■aising funds and covering Directors IS a strong and committed one. To take definitive action takes a lot of understanding. And you don’t get that understanding in just a year. We are after people who want to work hard and consLstently for freshwater.” The testing of the waters for major donors pretty well consumed the first year of Fountainhead.” said Gray. “So this Lll we dono«!*”" ® prospective Finish the Fwo years of lead IS needed for construction project'*'"® research, and education During the past year, several questions were raised by prospective donors regarding Grav .j? question was raised.” baTi! WeV individualbasis. We ve now compiled those questions and answers into a four-page companion with the original Fountainhead brochure in fund raising.” “One thing is becomingclearerand clearer a each year goes by: The issues of freshwater are becoming more complex. And as they . ur interpt and concern grows too. The Foundation is needed as a center, a cataivst! issues mformation on thc.se “A very major force is at work in regards to worki^n^g with our most precious rc.sourcc. water. That major force is the Freshwater Foundation.” wm mmrn mmm Mmm mmmms A I5fh Anniversary Open House An Opportunity to Tour the Institute, y 1 to See Exhibits, l^'f 'W uf «. r • :v *" 'f! The President ’s Report ’OvoI.7I' f'"""■"“i'«akesaboui ; > '■" ' '<> hniig .1 pioKriim of major chanee '" "•""'■■• • Dr. Marian Ha!X* PJCMilcnl oiiimlns ,.| ,|,c University of «hil!''"i"ii""' 'o mindnhili icllcrimg on im, I rcshwalcr oinulalion cvonls ilial occurred Iasi year; 0 |»cn lliMisc (o celebrate our I5ih anmvcrsatv; and ilie beKinning of in"u''iccni" II."*' ' program to cr s 's 1, '"•""“'ionm waterSUMS. I|,c completion of a successful onntanihcad program will mark 20 years in 'in ol ' "“"‘‘‘"i'"’ an*l bring01. m o our hopes and dreams to fruition iillin^ u Irrsi year with every indication of liinuie success. Several new proarams pledged lo'bt^D- 'd*'’'* ™""’'bi«ions 1 he verrlj'^ in exec s o r- «l»"<li'"res -r.-up ;i~ ^rba^^'Lpirx"’-.nbutions to be ,n,id ostT^rK? .oe^rmitments exceed inc^Sterd:: I hc directors have work...tr .. a.s.surestart-UDforasm in„ L7- ~;^rd- nnd wetr;: t”:; »'« year will be as fruitful and fli^n^'’'"”' Joseph P. Rossillon President my —h FRESHWATER FOUNDATION Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1983 ASSETS Cash on Hand and in Banks Investments Less Unrealized loss on Investment Pledges Receivable SI0L620 (4.846) $24,270 96,774 828,325* 21.050 22,891 691.267 $1.684.577 Mortgages Receivable Other Receivables & Misc. Fixed Land, Property, Equipment (at Cost of Gift Value) TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES AND EQUITY Liabilities: Misc. Accruals & Payables Notes Sl Mortgages Payable Deferred Contributions Unexpended Rest. Contrib. Received Total Liabilities Equity: Fund Balance 6/30/81 Excess Disbursements Less: Unrealized Loss on Investment Total Equity 6/30/83 TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUITY Statement of Revenue and Disbursements for 12 Months Ending 6/30/83 REVENUES S 21,191 806,854 828,325 21.213 $1,677,583 $ 96,561 (84,721) (4,846) 6.994 $1.684.577 Contributions Income Administering Grants Memberships Interest Miscellaneous TOTAL REVENUES EXPENSE AND GRANTS Foundation Institute & Other Grants Public Information TOTAL EXPENSE & GRANTS EXCESS DISBURSEMENTS * Excess disbursements covered by pledges receivable $518.402 711 54,397 6,243 25.141 $604,894 $ 130,533 327,095 23 1.987 $689,615 M4,72l)* h - . .‘i • i: ^ r. ' ' ■ »i - • _____ isfews#smu: ""1 ■: . -a^ .L^ y '■My-i f » ;Wmi:'-:: =y‘-y -y- y: h \ ’f: V ’ ■ ■ .. - v V' ■ • e.: . ■ t ‘i-’ i. ■• “ ■ •• A“ ■ " •' ■ ■ ■ -lyy, . .. ; <m T/'”" • •: • • • y ::J! A- ' / ■'^Wi^ ‘yym >.,•»’'t fwmymmymyymsmmm f^yyMyyi y'^fy ?yymu ■ ym i. •• v' i yymf^^yyyyy: yyy^f:mmyyyy :yymy:;mm fe. I !yy''::yyy:.y.yy,iyyy --“x . -y-yyy-yy' I: ■ ■••X ' . r. , Ml mmmmym KIM y^-rmyiK M^-yy ^mykmm ‘ ■:'> ^ : • >. ., ••• ‘ . • im\yyr.yU-~-^--%. 4.577 7.583 6.994 M.577 1 8.402 711 54.397 6.243 25.141 MJI94 30.533 27.095 3 1.987 19.615 4,721)* ’ ,***iUi, a. m •■-'r , ..... .. v;' -wc^■'';. •> • t ,' • • -J- v ’ -iMl ::rmn L%VL.'”'. Ill 'i rrnmmmm V-' A "f M :-f ■ ;:•. •''»;. *•■'.■ ■ ^'2 ^''-■■ - « -■." J iii •^^ii mm .y-- •■ :•;v-^v- mm K fy-rM my ) . A«; ^ *:»,“'■■■ '* ;l •••■.• ■•*./ ..• .. ..•. •<;• -r. • ' .•.*•.• - .^•.-••. .v.;! ^ A ;*'l- : ; 'A m^mB:wymr fmm S#;:m •* "m;- t .iA' l:f. w :mi': ■ ni y.vviSiv's^^sJafe -»Vt. •, .•’■ m'v<w. V ■ '• ■ •. r '/ r ■ f '• ‘A f ; •■ -vr -■ •ym:- ; ;•. i • • • a • -1 •."• •■ ■ •. •■ V9 Freshwater Q&A 3:APp W^lien I moved lo th# ««. «■. owned land next t» ** **** P«ople whow». r “r** *" "■* rivers. This sltuaflonJL«. **** ”^****^ *"«»e..., wtMt«“:xrztr'''"" :srrpr'”'“-* "•-«- called. wacTevdo^^jJX"'’.™'''’"' “* " '* •O accommodaie *Ihe nccds'^oMiT*’”" •ndustry. Laid down in the Old in use today. ° west, it is still '•oanda.ic.reaL-^, put water to a beneficial... • to do so, even if ih! ‘^‘-••amed the right riparian land.”* ‘*PP'^®Pnaior did not own investments coukj andyd^ '"'"*"8 sources far awav from th.!** that the most productive usm olT^ necessarily occur near Horlda, ha?a*unlqM system fo ***‘*”**“^*’ « ’'*'"• «'•••' <• “ •- "lilec a .ay and f„„*d itJTiyt"’ -"’ P'ospeci of finding eapensivc suppii.., ^ I sr ■*■ - a~ts. (potabk and''nonpoSle" “pim"'/'=• ;:;r:!:;: r - “n: environmentally .sensitive to the i'ampa Bay area. "• ‘he The project was sclecte.t .. outstanding engineering .'.1-^ ' ®‘ '« in the United States in%76*^'‘^"’‘^"‘ Projects ^ 'alien »4>'!o cm!l!i»,'!2'‘’’^'^'‘ '*' airpsr ‘lcmand""Vhe lit^ridop^^^^ legislation which hasc Zu ‘’I" water con.scrvation tools "■“ective 'Vafi:"T„;““^;;;W,.crca.cd.hoB„„„n independent self Un.. • “nimission. “an eoileet the -'’•^•h can and sale of bonds.”* “■‘'‘ ‘’’"'n user fees n’nn^ipa;’mauihi!:^"';^^ provides or water which protects " hearing aquifers and th ^ . ^'^'"'“«8-water hoiWingswithwater-slvZ I "" ''^'e Pros ided matching grants it *'« *«'i<ig projeeis in ,hr‘ ""““'^'‘i?e water- '“"K leak dc.oa£" "'"‘■"■'■ii inunieipalitic.s, ^ Programs ip llic.se answerf ^rThe'^^^”*''”'"' “"“fee of ^ceshwaler SoZ"' ‘’.Ty''"'' "•' ■"asi'/ine. poMi,^,’' ,. ' J' gl„i«y "“"’••■* ■“ ■Soc'-CmeX'"" " *'o"r information ivaila.Slc ‘'fn,'^"“^’'‘' ^'“'•’"gdidc i, chich „,.hii.o... "f ‘^'“hwalcr .s,K^.i..,.. «ailablo .^f;"erguido is „„„ »hich publishoa X • ■Science Mu.,cum '*"'■> 'fte "••'''„i„„ "trrn“0 “"“ wcalherguide combine, a ^■'7- I''"' naiure and wealher ^mVr wiih a n"paiar'";?rr:.^firp-' c.sotan.s. ® among ^ '-C cost is t/» uc ^ e 'hwater .Society nicrnh 'deluded, lax irid-Tuded. Please add^«?/Ef^-'"*‘ *^ 25, and handling. 51.00 lor postage- •—■.«.iiig, -'-• I'usidge Ihc '“sodely" a'fi'' WEath F*"'' " ^fcshwaler.Socie,y 2mKh “^^“‘''DE. "o* 90, Navarre. ;;:A. iii ■ by ■ ■ ;;r-::4w •’1