The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11-21-1983 Planning PacketPLANNING CONNISSION AGENDA COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.N. MONDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 1983 COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - Tim Adams CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 7:00 - 7:29 P.M. - Subdivision Regulations City Attorney Malkerson to address Planning Commission 2.7:30 P.M. #788 Freshwater Foundation, 2500 Shadywood Road Conditional Use Permit, PRD Subdivision, and Rezoning 3. 7:45 P.M. f794 Michael Pluhm, Franklyn Dailey and Wi 11 iam Mernik Vacation of Pence Lane 7 4. 8:00 P.M. #795 Paul Elmer, 3980 Dahl Road Subdivision ACTION ITEMS 5. #796 Lachlen Reed, 1500 Bracketts Point Road Variance 6. #799 Bruce Clark, 1180 Lyman Avenue Variance ^ 7. #800 Thomas Burnevik, 3640 Northern Avenue Variance 7 8. #802 John Munsell, 4100 North Shore Driv€ Variance SKETCH PLAN REVIEW 9. #801 Painters Creek.Development, 4680 Bayside Road Subdivision DISCUSSION 10. Planning Commission to select a member to attend Council meeting of December 12, 1983. APPROVAL OP MINUTES 11. Approval of Planning Commission minutes of October 17, 1983. INFORMATION I U 12. Joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission to be held December 19, 1983, concerning common ownership. (7;30 P.M.) ADJOURNMENT )NMISSION AGENDA. ^MBERS 7:00 P.N. IVEMBER 21 r 1983 lams jion Regulations address Planning Commission Foundation, 2500 Shadywood Road »ermit, PRD Subdivision, and Re zoning m, Franklyn Dailey and William Mernik :e Lane 3980 Dahl Road acketts Point Road nan Avenue 5 Northern Avenue >rth Shore Drive >pment, 4680 Bayside Road ict a member to attend Council meeting ission minutes of October 17, 1983. ' tl(i. Council and Planning Commission to be oncerning common ownership. (7:30 P.M.) Planning Commission Members comm Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning AdministratorFROM; DATE:November 18, 1983 SUBJECT;#788 - Freshwater Foundation - 2500 Shadywood Road PRD Subdivision - Conditional Use Pemit & Rezoning List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Shardlow’s letter Notices to applicant Property Owners List Plat Map - designating ownership pattern Revised preliminary plan 11^ t John Shardlow's letter (Exhibit A) explains that the rush to permit construction this year has been called off. We can proceed with our usual review. I do not have written reports from the various staff members and consultants. County Highway Department asked to comment on this application but I have been able to discuss and review the positions of the highway department and various staff persons. My report will site their position when appropriate. I do not feel that the Planning Commission should delay any formal action on the application ^ ® condition such approval asking that all written reports be submitted and reviewed by staff prior to scheduling application for Council action. Subdivision - Plat The preliminary plan is incomplete as it does not reflect the scope of the subdivision. The notice sent out to the applicant (Exhibit B) advised of at least two alternate preliminary plans. The affects the property described as PID 21-117-23 22-0001 (see Exhibit D). A platting will require a new legal description for the remainder of that parcel. Per the current plan. Outlet D should be extended to . include the entire parcel. I suspect that the property described as ^ PID 17-117-23 44-0087 has also been affected in the creation of Outlet A but this is difficult to determine with present plans. Applicant will be asked to comment. 4- «%014^i^ted*in"theucSty^of Orono!°^I wLld suggest thStotthe appllcwCdt include this in the plat as an extension of Outlot D merely to avoid any future confusion and to provide clean, less cumbersome legal ^ descriptions for owners. The cost to include the property is minimal at this time. mmm r * 1^. #788 - Noveml: Page 7 The r< rill three inclu( single and w< Unive: water The 1' •/ i * Henne; Count no CO contr in th the i most ask f the U this The r inter of rc advis densi The V woulc if H€ surv€ The < to tl sewei will sewej unit! Work: util The : that perf re so The u^wente and City 1 Comm ywood Road - & Rezoning rush to permit roceed with our embers and nt on this the positions of report will site he Planning cation but to s be submitted for Council action. r-i ii: Bct the entire ^ applicant (Exhibit . The plat clearly 01 (see Exhibit D). e remainder of extended to . y described as reation of Outlot A Applicant will as 2JL-ai7-23 thdiDdbhe appllcandCd-t' erely to avoid some legal »erty is minimal ■4 n \d ' ^ * 'AtSb* . f * . m #788 “ Freshwater Foundation November 18, 1983 Page 2 The road is platted as Outlot C defined ® should^be^three duplex units. What is the purpose of Outlo^rBi. M shou included in Outlot D. A shared access location ^^ouldte approved for the single family residences in this review. The ,-ociolved bv the and\ater lines and their ownership are ortvatrsewL and University and the applicant as they are indivi p shadvwood. water service lines with separate hookups in righ this review The location of the shared access should be approved in th Hennepin County is concerned with the ““"V J"? Snit?pose°"^ n^concerns. iheir problem is with the most northern accep under the control of the University of Minnesota the ^“^^^"ciose toIn this Dlat. The access is unsafe because it is located too crose to the*^intersection of County Roads 15 & 19 and dangerously close to the m^st southern access of the neighbor's garage. ^ ReL^iLr,Tsl for cooperation from the applicant concerning this matter. Re^m^r, the university of Minnesota owns Outlot A and has a defined interest in this plat. of roadway for Old Beach Road on the revised plat. ^pl^>ant sh °LTrefall a^eas dedicated for roadways cannot be included in areas for density credit. The wetlands must be designated as drainage easement °"^tevised plat. I woulS siggest that the flood plain elevation ^ f arp?icLfsif Hennepin County Surveyors will permit. I will ask that tne appiica su?TV©yoir attsnd th© public h©sring# TKo *»naineer sees no problem with the proposed sewer and water service ^ the’ihree duplex units. There is adequate capacity on the existing seweflinel now that lift station «6 has been upgraded. The new own«s will be charged $150 per resident unit (duplex $300) sewer district. The existing sewer and water lines will se^e the duplex units without the need to alter existing municipal lines. Works Department has asked that the City ask for un er utility Lsements over Outlot C because the road shall remain private. The building department wants assurance that the City's right thlt the University of Minnesota obtain necessary permits ^?formld on residLtial units or institute be reaffirmed in a final resolution approving the plat. The Police Chief strongly recommen4s that the University of City^^and Spring Hill Conference Center, another non-taxpaying entity. Ife \ 1 • I It - I #788 - Novembe Page 3 A park Three di Two sin< Tota: Rezonir The re2 use is notifie rezonin the Coir endange sewer a approva complet PRD - Di In reviei Minneota Foundatit credit aJ (34.452) Required Proposed Per Ordin a minimum density r remainder this appr In rev: duplex whethei acre. that or sought density changed (Three dupl 161,172 sq •;r; 'i oad serving the It should be be approved for the drive and sewer esolved by the ivate sewer and way of Shadywood. n this review. iing created along :ial units pose access under the :y not included I ted too close to sly close to the Lty can certainly 3 matter. Remember, ifined interest in I along to the litional dedications )plirant should be jiuded in areas for >n revised plat. I lated on the plat that the applicant's and water service y on the existing d. The new owners as required in that ill serve the duplex nes. The Public rlying road and 1 remain private. *s right to require mits for any work .rmed in a final ;y of Minnesota \t for local fire cists between the ixpaying entity. ‘1^- •• ’i" £ X fX ^ i I i #788 - Freshwater Foundation November 18, 1983 Page 3 A park fee will be required - payment shcedule as follows: duplex i $1,000) = $3,000Single family (one single § $400) = 800 Total part fee payment = Rezoning irnSt"! S?mirted°Sse®irrco^r- 35.310 - residential notified twicl. 1 have riceivid f??®: ’’'’® have been rezoning. The proposed use will °°'"Pl®te support of the the Comprehensive ElndUsrpTai norw??, ;?^®®"^^^*^ ofendangerment to the publil health residential use pose an approval of the zoning application ? Proposal, staff recommends PRD - Duplex Credit - Conditional Use Permit MinCCCtroC^G!F!B??"CSCs^l0^2racr« "°"“.®PP®“ the University of Foundation to approximately i8?49 acres ThC^ia*^ °""®‘* ‘*3' thecredit affords ample area to ea*-acres per wetlands (34.452) as follows! satisfy standards of PRD (38.610) and LR-LB Required - one unit per one acre/43,560 so f^ Proposed - one unit per 2.3 acresAoif^C^f^rt. rCiClmiC“re^gh“Lrts^rt Tt «>«<3itymust be assured that density ratio. ^Whatevlr the given remainder of the land, eight acres must^^^«\*'®^ a” future for the this approval. ^ ®®t aside as a condition of duplex unit^should'^be^credited as^two”Snits’r^^'*^whether the whether the units should be cred^era^^w^ requiring two acres or acre, in approving a duplex credit for two residential units per one that only 100% of single lot standards be requires sought by the applicant to permit attachf»H nni’i- the duplex credit density ratio, b^ed on tL^dupiL creS shou?/5^®^^changed as follows: ^ ^ credit, should the density ratio be “its) one unit per 3.7 acres/ ^^ - residential hbors have been support of the ^e intent of se pose an lere is adequate ;aff recommends ?roval being roval. ^ersity of ind owned by the !r wetlands 10) and LR-LB sured that given ture for the ondition of whether the cres or ts per one Lty requires i duplex credit given :y ratio be : 3.7 acres/ #788 - Freshwater Foundation November 18, 1983 Page 4 We will need this part clarified. The only other interpretation “"“g®^j^“®he^PRD^suMivision^ Lots 1, and duplex credit adiacent to the commercial district. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. .TillWIBIl I Sta£^ recommendation; to approve the preliminary ®"“^^i“°;!„5inq®adequlte s2wer®and“Iterapplication of the Freshwater Foundation finding adequar^^ standards capacity within the existing municipal syste °itirfi“tSrt^^proia? triplet the fouowln, conditions: siti5.1 ..«t ..t.r schools, etc written affirmation that ?rrestdL?!aT'unifs anfl.W.B’fl. sign-off on resolution, separate agreement 1 1-0 «5inale family residence must be approvedShared access location to single ramixy by the County Highway Department City to require an underlying road and utilities easement over Outlet C Dedication of right of way for County Road 19 and Old Beach Road wetlands to be designated as drainage elementsjn hhe^lat^and^if^ ’o?:hr;?at! firif arcoLervrtlon’easement to be required over all areas designated as drainage easements Rezoning from B-4 to LR-IB to be formally approved at the same time the PRD plat is approved Surveyor to include the following in plat: a) include remaining portion of property with PID 21-117-23 - 22-0001 as part of Outlet D b) Remove Outlet E and include "j^hin Outlet D unless applicant has another reason for creation of Outlet [- \ 7. 8. -i-m v' V ■' ■■ ' •. V’ #788 - Fi November Page 5 c. d. af fe must e. Cour f. side lin< 9. Payi Thr' Two 10. App on Prior tc that Pic in Oronc all roa< ■ i/er assessments r redits. joint PRD on. Lots 1, rcial district standard. the authority , this section. and Rezoning sewer and water standards )de have been :onditions: Into an agreement and police ter system. obtain all and imjprovements ion, separate it be approved sment over 1 Beach Road plat and if e designated q\iir©d over all t the same tiiUe tl-117-23 - 22-0001 D unless applicant j.., « 1788 - Freshwater Foundation November 18, 1983 Page 5 'V>. • •> in oi. 22-0014 withino. City recommends including property PID 21-1 currsnt pXst - — no aa—onft7 li^s bG©nr. surv^yor^tfadvise the';eralninl ^r?ion affected by the creation of Outlot A ana must be included in this pla 1 iaht of way along extended Outlot D for e. Dedicated additional right of way aio g Siunti Road 19 and Old Beach Roadcounty Koaa xjr -- - - -- ^ f. Drainage and utility ease^nt should be^desig^^^^ 9. payment of park fee per fee schedules ?l;rsing!e"Urir (oSe tfng!e 1 l\oT ’ !!:loL Total park fee payment = $3,800 <» --—“ “— on final approval of PRD platon rinai appi^jv^*. „io. to tl- SVldl.,. -sSnSS m=i.«- all roadway deductions. m.n-’-V A V' Consulting Howard Di 10 Never Jeanne t CITY OF P.O. Bo3 Crystal, Dear Jec As you ) construe this lal aval lab] At the I schedule prior tc We have Program will nol Conseque prior tc On beha] for the Commissj Thank yc cc: Jos Eli 22-0014 within 1087 has been jmaining portion Outlot D for id 5* along the street property to be conditioned aff requests in’s land holdings exclusive of Consulting Planners 10 November 1983 Dear Jeanne: tviva'Tk'-'* • One Groveland Terrace f61 21377-3536 Minneapolis Minnesota 55403 Howard DaMoren Assodatea / Inoorporatsd : m© Jeanne Mabusch, Zoning Administrator CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal, Minnesota 55323 NOV I 48© As you know it has been the hope of the Freshwater Foundation that the construction could begin on the first phase of their housing development this late fall and winter. This would have made these living units available to serve the internship and exchange programs next summer. At the Planning Commission meeting we discussed the review and approval schedule which would have allowed the Fovindation to gain footing permits prior to plat approval. He have just learned that although in general funding for the Fountainhead Program is right on schedule, the specific funding for these housing units will not be available in time to allow them to be constructed this winter. Consequently, there is no reason to continue to request footing permits prior to the completion of the entire approval process. On behalf of the Freshwater Foundation, I'd like to express our appreciation for the concern and special consideration which both you and the Planning Commission were prepared to give this matter. Thank you. John Shardlow Prip^pal Planner cc: Joseph Rossi11ion Elizabeth Close r5- ............ ■y-mm! m i Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay I! Freshwater Fou! 2500 Shadywood Mound, MN 553 NOTICE OF PLAN! Date of Meetim Votes: Planning Commi Appro Appro Appro Denia Table Table No ac NOTES AND SPEC py*r>pr>gf>d fiix _ Mr>\7g>TTiV~)<=>r- "y\ f - ynnr T*f>vi^w at 1983. In add plans desiqna provide adius density ratio Applican • • *I . % Applican addition meeting for the In all cases, requested inf or the City v If the applic contact the 5 If you des they are c and appro\ '.»'r 6121377-3536 OV I 4803 I f)F QRONO at the elopment its mer. pproval permits untainhead sing units is winter. permits appreciation Planning f. • fTil ■:fAU vStV' =Tl l i A ILij Post Office Box 66 •Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323• Municipal-Offices Telephone 473-7357 Freshwater Foundation Dennis Purcell 2500 Shadywood Road Stragar Roscoe Mound, MN 55364 630 Twelve Oak Circle 15500 Wayzata Blvd NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMiS§^6&^^CT^Bn Variance X conditional Use Permit (PRD) X Subdivision, Preliminary X Rezoning_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date of Notice 10-21-83 4 V I V.;- Date of Meeting __ Votes: _ _ _ _ For 10-17-83 Against Howard Dahlgren Associates One Groveland Terrace Suite 102 Minneapolis, MN 55403 Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval: As submitted E 'rp-ai: MditiLri before council ™eetin, ---- Tabled- Pendin^receipt^ol additional information from applicant — ^^biedi pending review by others, or further Planning Commxssxon Study X No action required NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS a pnhUf hearing will hp srhednlpd for the- - - °<v lot eiihdivisinn and rprnning (B-4 t.n T.B-in) fnr Monday, 91 iQ«-» T --------------- a slfetrh nf the prnpnspd snhdivisinn ton- ,-,.v<ew and comment- -T win nppd formal siihdivisinn plans by Nnvpmhpr 2. 1983 in T would like at your earliest convenience one of the large. lan. deslcnatino access locations for the County Highway review. Plea^- - - - .„vlde ad-iustpd total area calculation for total unit development and current density ratio. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: »-• I - 9 Planning Commission Council _ _ _ ___ _ _ I I • Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the ---------l--------------------------- meeting is _ _ _ _- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - --- - - -- -— for the ■_ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _meeting. In all cases, the application must be continued with the submxttal of requested information within or the City will consider the application as formally withdrawn. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Administrator. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission Minutes they are available from the Building and Zoning Secretary upon review and approval by the Planning Commission. /■ -V- I ... vevv V. - ML jy ;. ; -H ^ ■ V ^ • V . /i ■:''. V^ ■ V’; ■ -•■•V y- y !r-y ' ■ ■ . ■ : . - -i’Mm onal Use Permit slon« Preliminary g 000 % i C".> i.‘ r CD CVI o CVJ UU CL lx.tr. o oo q :oo< X oeg u 3 M3 <<^ 3 X to to 0 u in3 t-^ 3 • O X X 3M -J ID O 3 ^ ^ 3 E N o n < Kl O ^a^ eg o M 3 55 3 3O< <o 3 3 Oo3 in <3 3 3 3 O 3 3 3 to3in to o o pm MM p3 1 O 0 P 3 3 O V ZM3 3 <^ O XM1- M < 1 < < X X 3M3 X O in 33X X 0 3 3 in en e < 3 3 o o > 3 3 m <to 3 3 a 3 X a*o o o q: X eg u eg <UJ M fO ID jg eg to I o tu ^ M •H O ID r-l I rHeg o IL eo eg to o o M O 2 liJ X in M U ID <^ UJ -I CD X eg fH O ttl eg eg < CL O -I o •- Itl < mom z't >:< in < O eg 3 o e.5 eg M I a >- M —J M I M Mm to in UJ in X >X e < o o ^°g|i ,000 CL *J in M Oo UJ u. M 3 «Cs m gin eo to to eg **■ Z 'O *4-32^< < CJ Ul ^ *9 •o > Z Z Z *^-‘8,u8u; UJ lu m ^ jS2 ^ !> t- > O M SS2!Sg552 M to o o g“?M r-l to to s 5 a ss* oS** “ «• < lApi iA O UJ M m )0 H OVf in SShz m NZZZa < < < . *i'S§S r. X V) tt ■-« W M < V %l M <3 eg in X ^ r-i>o «0 eg to o -tC Chr- eg Xo fi *s M 3 3 O M in UJ UJ c\j < u. u. Z Z I lu u. u. < Z r- I o O w V HHJCM CO to in «D ri o ss 5 5 o o in UJ r* q g> X eg UJ \ I CO M M eg eg to eg I M M I M eg n- mto in ^ ^ in -* -* tUJ UJ 3 3 »n o p Z a CL ^ z 0) «) o o Ctl p UJ > eg eg O 3 < M o >- to eg I r^ M H M eg COto °'^Hgo o . —, 10 in 3 8 o in eg < H UJ UJ ^ in in > ^Ui 3 < o M UJ £3|2 Z CL «t '»“2lz _J V) o z Mcj^cn O H X M O O eg eg to eg • M M I M eg S au. UJ in oc UJ 3 -I o 9M M CD CD «D O O 3 eg o O" a to in to egr O -Ji& O 3 M to to in in e^ oo to eg M to to in in to >- o:« 8 UJ UJ Q M ^S ^ X lU 3 3 m 3 XX 3 v> M O < UJ UJ o ^ 3 3 m < iL u. eg X eg I h* M M I M eg gs 35 in X §Siin >•sss o < 3 H UJ §SS“ •^•!!88S{eg I M M I M eg UJ UJ UJ M CO eg to in UJ eg UJ COto to tg uo|| CO in 3 in to IDq eg ID H- I O O O 3 o M O 3 to M O O 3 eg U eg < UJto ID eg UJ -J O I P . ^ sdM o M I M ooS N UJ 3 3 O eg eg 8*^ X <3UJ a Q V) i“:s to eg I N M M C M eg u < ID X o 3_ to z mM X m -J u ^ < o M < u» ^ S ^ X P Z 0-1 £ < ID O ^ * a o H S ** 3 o ^ o> «• 5 S 5t S a: P oc < W CL ID 3 X ^ 3 o eg O«-§ to V eg p I < ^ 3CM in M I H eg in S 8g M to to o m^ M 3 m ?3o ID X P o o O 3 ID M H to to in to eg oc o m M u I- in I* S8 X M o in p < in ID to in eg ' I •H M I M ^ eg m X ID 3 _ _ 5 z 111 lu Z ^ £S«8a UJ UJ O •• XX _3P to eg ZgPM_ Ift X O O M UJ S; X M lA HI 8okSo**iu to eg I M M I M eg S8 3 3 s II H H \ 3 OP < 3 g 3 . >• V. 3 3 X 3 3 gia§ OZUl< K < 1^ 3 3 3 X 3 3 < >• N — <CL 3 3 X IIB*IIB*IIB® s IIP •-SII eg?* I ai TO; FROM: DATE; SUBJECT; Applicab Orono Orono State List of Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit The City Pence Lai 152' Ion. 3. Requc E. D< 5. To k€ must Staff Rec to appro\ to the fc 1. Appli 2. Appli .4IK7-V TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Members Thomas Jacobs, Building Official November 17, 1983 #794 - Franklyn E. Daily, Michael G. Pluhm, & William Z. Mernick - Street Vacation Applicable ordinance - City & State Orono Zoning Code Section 32.700 Orono Zoning Code Section 33.050 State Statute 412.851 (enclosed in packet) List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Petition for Vacation Exhibit B - Property owners list Exhibit C - Plat map Exhibit D - Memo - John Gerhardson, Exhibit E - State Statute 412.851 Public Works Coordinator The City is in receipt of a petition for the vacation of Pence Lane. Pence Lane was platted as part of RLS851 with a 30' right of way and is 152' long extending to Lot 1, Block 1, Carman Bay Heights. Staff has reviewed the application which has revealed the following: 1. The 30' right of way does not meet current standards for a City road 2. The private road will have limited use,3-4 properties 3. Request to vacate is made by all abutting property owners—Franklyn E. Daily, Michael G. Pluhm, and William Z. Mernick 4. Pence Lane functions as a private road now and ends at the lake 5. To keep Mr. Mernick's lot from becoming land locked, applicants must enter into a declaration of road and maintenance agreement Staff Recommendation: to approve the vacation of Pence Lane based on the above findings subject to the following: 1. Applicant to enter into a road and maintenance agreement 2. Applicant to grant a road and utility easement M 1 .— .J r'; Ms. Jeai Zoning I City of P.O. Bo: Crystal Dear Ms SUBJECT (Lot 8) SUBDIVI AVENUE Ihe und SO THAI M. G. F EASEMEN BAY HEl The unc propert LOT 29, ID 421- DATE LOT 1, ID #21 DATE ucn ID LO ID & William Z. ator Pence Lane. of way and is s. e following: for a City road s wners—Franklyn at the lake applicants e agreement findings subject ment Ms, Jeanne Mabusth Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay^ MN 55323 Dear Ms. Mabusth SUBJECT; CITY OWNED ALLEy, NAMED PEN2E LANE, suBDmsi^^^^roii^J^ sSivisioN from kelly AVENUE (N 1/2 SEC 21 TW 117 R 23) ■Ihe undersigned property owners petition the cm OF OBONO TO VACATE THE ALLEY SO THAT IT MAY BE TOKNED INTO A PRIVATELY CMNED ROAD. THE CWNER IS TO BE ^r^PI^M. ™s TT«®FER OF TITLE IS TO BE SOBJ^ TO EASEMENTS FOR AOCESS AND EGRESS TO lOT 29, R.L.S. No. 891, I/3TS 1 2, CAR BAY HEIGHTS, AS WEIL AS TO A MUTUALLY AGREEABLE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT. The undersigned property owners further certify that they represent aU properties adjacent and immediately concerned with the alley in question. LOT 29, R.L.S. No. 891 ID #21-117-23-23-0029 exhibit October 13, 1983 '94 i i ) _........ ■ «—« - ^ J OCT I 41983 „j niTY OF ORONO DATE FWNKLYN E. ^mpiY rmutLoJ PATRICIA DAILEY LOT 1, CARMAN BAY HEIGHTS ID #21-117-23-23-0046, 0051 MICHAEL G. PLUHM SUSANNE PLUHM LOT 2, CARMAN BAY HEIGHTS ID #21-117-23-32-0007 DATE /^ 03/]?^ LOT 1, BLOCK 1, WALTERS PORT ID #21-117-23-23 0049, 0039 MICHAEL G. PLUm SUSANNE PLUIW r r r T^t r r I. li. 3 O 4-fv.T: P ‘ L ^ inK> m M • uj o o z <CL sCL UJ DC UJ Hin >-tn zoM r (n DC Mo -»Uu Z CD M DC UJ >- Z ^ 3 z oUJCL >- O H CL Z a. ui z V oK z Z Z ou zMz UJ CO\ h*o N.o r-4 r r r f 4*o o o o z Kl CM CM o o ^ o*g M t CM Z < to cn eg < inin in in m >. CM -J z< r** UI Io CM in o^ CO cj m o < z -I <z ^ o X a UI ^ z -I oUJ M ^ in UJo z m-4 M 0 0 3 o z «« m H CM z Z<c <c in in zCM < Z I z z N X o z X m Q in < in o in z I «• z X in in in z(^ o ^ X CM Z CM in oMo >CO CM <moo < z < o inX < z H Xz oM in z >M) O CM ZOM in uXz o oo z > < m CM oz<M O>- ID z z UJz m m in z z > < o z (D < Z Mz o CD >- j * in 1 ino «• CMo -n inz in z emu < o XCM Z J>-Jo*M in ^*4 o z o O < O Z Hzm CM Z a <( z m in in CM < in I z z X r^ z ^ o inCM in < z .o zCO CM <moo m m m o m z z z in I- in z X z < E E in < z O UI o X in z <z m z< o O CM M in zuXz z !< CM Oo z5 o z zz u flO ooc zz >- <z X aoo< zE< Z O H- < Z z z Z E O O < Z O O Z Z < < >• N Z Z Z E Z O H O Oo z m H CM Z < m in z z aCO CM Z Zm o o o ►-z z< E in< z z o X Mz in in z o u X CM Z O O O Z in CM m CM I X uM O oin X z- \ < z Z E < zH Nzo z •n > CM < in >• CM z I z r* z ^ X I CM O CO CM m o mmz z in MM in H H < < z z z > ^ > > •< 5 X I -J o Z M in in X in^4^ Z E E C^ IM 0 0^0 X X X H H CM Z 'O o o z in >CM < Z <m >• H z z z I z z z ^ ^ z ^ X I u 1-4 Z CM in CD in X CO CMm o z Klin in in z 1^1 O V “:Jg Z Z M X in z ^ z z m z o in u o XCL CM Z CM Z O Q < O Z ►- zm HCM X z < X in in X CJ < o z z cO CM Mmom m m m o m z z X M inz < z z oX X Mz z in z in z z M> u H n* X in CM z z z E o < o X <zZ Z O X Z 3 Z O z o z o z < >• \< z Z E X < < X M mo z tn CM o z m < CM M I O >- I H m CL m in z in §15 Z Z Z £ < <- z o CO CMin o < < iiSo o ^O o CM zoMin zuXz (^ CM oo m <CM z m z CM u I Xh- Z •-« Z >• M Z <z o M < < O M UZ M Z Z H <«• z m in < in z in > *a z I M >- z < CO CM z m o z z z X X z E z o X o O h* Z CM O 5 COCMO o z m > CM < H M m VCM Z I Z z ^ X z in CO CM m o in X< z M Z > 2-5o: M U -J Oin z M o X in < m z 4Ji X ^ u o XCL z CM Z z o < z O X z< >z ^ z < z z z O X X Z 3 < Z O H za 3 ^5E • 4 TO : FROM: h- z z €0 CM Z z m o z z DATE: SUBJECT: I have revi< that there « or sanitary mmoo z m > CM < mm in in ‘.n . m >- z CM z u I Z Mz z <-4 E I Z U M Z z 5 ■a' CM O Zo > z CO CM < in o E >-z z z o Z Mz ^ in z z > o z z o u < X E CM z 1 would sug< CMmo z z o > z DC < < UJ m H M CM O z z m < z X CM-M z < 1-0 z > la- > H „ m m m z m > M X Z < oz < M O XE TL O M in CM O < 3 3 ^ z CO U X CM Z L >4 A\ii O Mu> Ul Ul fO n : lA I in ii ^ o ;§ a 4 o ro Ki in in Ul > < 5g Ul M >: in in uj ^ o X CM Ul oo < \ Ulc Kl o Ul lu M 3 Ul in > CM < m >- CM -j I aJ Ul ^ X N N M M r-« Klpninin -j Ul Ul Ul > I 3r CM o a tt S -i o Ul M X in Ul Ul CO CM Ul Ul in o -J -I O Ul *4 UX CM Ul mmoo Ul m > CM < tnm inin in >» Ul CM -J u I -I M Ul a ^ ^ ^ •4 x: I CM O Ul o > q: CO CM < in o 2: UJ < 2 Ul Ca >-M -J aK ^ o UJ M .J X in UJ *1 > O Ul q; o u < X 2: CM Ul CMm O Ul UJ O > -I CK < < UJ in h- M CM o UJ -I m < Ul z CM M a >- M M UJ > < mm mu> o ot < M n:o o >• »-« -I in I Z UJ ^ < CO «i UJ vj M -I CO U «0 CM < ^ X m o 3 3 CM Ul Ul a«r o Ms? K < Ul&III £ O H ^ I t>t -1 4 I r-, • t * » :5 . ■ r L ■ . -'i?ms :^y'- /■ i W ► ir nil-l!, I ■ 11 - ft ^■i( 4 • • % pyUBCSiy TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator November 16, 1983 Pence Lane Vacation Pence Lane vacation request and have determined or"Lnitary“lwer Unef I would suggest obtaining road and utility easements for the future. !'V' I Vf l ? ‘ -J? f-#k:m ^ '•r' m h» »■ r" 412.751 STATU' History: 412.751 EMI If in an\ unforeseen ca any calamity < city of makinf ihcity treasi and to bear ii ledccm all su the following calcs shall be History: 412.761 412.771 M2.781 412.791 412.801 412.811 412.821 412.831 OI The CO newspaper < shall be put be so publis in the public Histor 412.841 ( 1 412.851 V The c public way, of the own or part the may be ad< such vacali so after a 1 resolution of the pro< the vacatic the real es county au( the instrui record.” 1 file the no Histc 1969 c 9 s b letermined valves. ;he future. . . . i- .. . . ■ >1 ■ •s.^ V 412.751 STATUTORY CITIES llislory: c 119 s 90: I97Jt c 123 art 2 s I sulul 2 412 751 emergency DEBT CERITHCAIts. 1 in mv year ihc receipts from taxes or other sources should from some f ^ . .n* r aise bccomc insufficient for the ordinary expenses of the city or if rany other public emergency should subject the city to the ncccs- any ® j ^^rdinar^y expenditures, the council may authorize the sale by Jk’' ?1 V c',"Srer ccrtifica.es to run no. .o exceed .wo years History; 1949 c 119 s 91: 1974 c 337 s 14 412.761 1 Repealed, 1967 c 2S9 s IS ) 412.771 1 Repealed. 1967 c 2S9 s IS ) 112.781 1 Repealed, 1967 c 2S9 s IS ) 412.791 I Repealed. 1967 c 2S9 s IS ) 412.801 1 Repealed, 1967 c 289 s 18 ) 412.811 [ Repealed, 1967 c 289 s 18 ] 412.821 1 Repealed, 1967 c 289 s IS ] general and miscellaneous 41'> 8^1 OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER. , in the public interest to have published m this manner. History: 1949 c 119 s 100; 1973 c 123 art 2 s 1 subd 2 412.841 1 Repealed, 1976 c 44 s 70 ) vacate any street, aUey,, public grounds. “solution of vacl.fon is adopfed, the clerk shall prepare a .ounty auditor who shall enter the same tn his transfer records ^hc instrument, over his official signature, the words entered m the t anste^ record.” The notice shall then be filed with the county recorder. An) file the notice shall not invalidate any such vacation proceedings. History; 1949 cl 19 s 102; 1953 c 735 s 12; 1957 c 3S3sI; 1967 c2S9 s 15. 1969 c9s S5; 1973 c 123 ari2s 1 subd 2; 1973 c 494 s 11; 1976 c 181 s % H'tE'.T IV412.861 PROSECUTIO Subdivision 1. Com;' be brought in the name < inal cases. If the accuse shall thereafter be made, shall issue thereon. The directed for .service to ar or constable of any town . of them. Subd. 2. Form and ■ ; the ordinances or re.solut; or chapter. They shall h not be given in cvidcnc; shall be given, if for the imposed, with costs: and Ihc defendant be commit: days, as the court shall ; judgment, the costs, and ti. shall be received by the It county, until lawfully disch;. ant at any time upon paymi: Subd. 3. Appeal to d.*' court in the same manner actions; but, if taken by ll. approved by the court, con. or in part, he will pay the ji him on the appeal. In case defendant and his sureties. I discharged from custody. History: 1949 c 119 s i 1973 c 123 art 2 s 1 subd 2; 1: 412.87 1 FINES AND PENAl All fines, forfeitures, an; ute or ordinance to which the treasury. Every court or of. thereof under oath in accord:* for the amounts paid. One of ; History: 1949 c 119 s IC- 412.881 PRESIDENT AND I ' Whenever the term “pie: sl^aiulc applying to any statute- the term “recorder” as so user History: 1949 c 119 s 10. 412.891 INCONSISTENCY Any provision in this cha; Chapter 208, Laws 1933, Cha/; Chapter 526, shall not apply to. History: 1949 c 119 s 100; TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT; Zoning C Applicat List of Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit The app persona applicai lots of appear i will af; is prop< apparent is avai; have to across ] Staff re 1. Gran stat 2. Paynu i Vi r * f s7129 l.7‘ 4 1 2.86 1 PROSECUTIO: Subdivision 1. Coin; ' be broui:hi in the name c inal oases. If ihe accuse shall thcreaficr be made, shall issue thereon. The directed for service to at; or constable of anv town of them. Subd. 2. Form and the ordinances or rcsolut; or chapter. They shall h not be given in evident-, shall be given, if for the imposed, with costs: and the defendant be commit: days, as the court shall ; judgment, the co.sts. and ti. shall be received by the K |Vf. shall be received by __ .. county, until lawfully disch:. ant at any time upon payme: Subd. 3. Appeal to 6'- court in the same manner actions; but, if taken by tl. approved by the court, con or in part, he will pay the ji him on the appeal. In case defendant and his sureties. I discharged from custody. History: 19-19 c 119 s i 1973 c 123 an 2 s 1 subd 2; h 412.871 FINES AND PENAl. All fines, forfeitures, ar; ule or ordinance to which the treasury. Every court or of! thereof under oath in accord:- for the amounts paid. One of; History: 1949 c 119 s Id- 412.881 PRESIDENT AND I ' Whenever the term “pri : statute applying to any statute ^ the term “recorder” as so usci History: 1949 c 119 s 10. 412.891 INCONSISTENCY Any provision in this cha: Chapter 208, Laws 1933, Chai'.: Chapter 526, shall not apply to. History: 1949 c 119 s 100; m t: TO; FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Members Michael P. Gaffron, Septic Systems Manager November 17, 1983 #795 - Paul Elmer - 3980 Dahl Road - Subdivision Zoning District - LR-lB - one acre minimum - Application - Subdivision - plat - two lots 140' lot width List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Survey The applicant is Mr. Paul J. Elmer, with Marian M. Elmer listed as personal representative for the Howard Meagher estate. Mr. Elmer, as applicant, proposes a subdivision of this 2.25 acre parcel into two lots of 1.05 acre and 1.20 acre, respectively. Both proposed lots appear to meet the 140' miminum lot width requirement. The division adequate setback area for all existing structures. Access IS proposed for Lot 2 by means of a private driveway easement over Lot 1, apparently using the existing entrance from Dahl Road. Sanitary sewer IS available by means of a lift station on Lot 1^ and service would have to be extended to Lot 2 by the owners through a private easement across Lot 1. Staff recommends approval based on the following conditions: 1. Granting of a utility easement to the City for the existing lift station and City sewer lines 2. Payment of all applicable sewer assessments and fees for the new lot Lot^i^^ evidence of private easements for driveway and sewer across ' ■■ asion th listed as Ir. Elmer, as 1 into two osed lots ‘he division ures. Access ment over Lot 1, anitary sewer vice would ate easement ns: isting lift for the new lot d sewer across T ?• r • ' S 'I iHUMMikii 1^'- 'fijf :w- C\ r r\.^ :si li 5?-- ■N Itf hniz -^0* yt*') k / jfZf UT/ (3j \ * •* f» I (««o (L*) ____<■^7.7 ✓/#-</be ar- \ w, (W»j = ij \ n r« 1 51 /u ^ (->') f.*t r V ni 1 ^ y......254.4 .......... / I•" J| ■— “'V'^dormtrly lots t«Z,X^»33,^4y^ ft port of voC-stf##!) 550MC.4C.4I0 I LOMA LINDA^AVE 4c 0 31 30 29 pr < ^i( 2<S' 't .tY4«n'M- i ^ -3 26 ^ iS W' ^ _ 31 * Iz^. ! > •• < - 9 V/ M ie 9 17/1 #795 \ veiled to-is-i! *Oih' 1 <>o. pooX-i) (ay] ri::> OCT 2 01983 I • / g. t„ •*% niTY OF OROiMV.!'J ■ H . W:r ‘i • VT Pi :V- ■■•:. ■■ 4- '. i ik yyS,:./y ■^ys. I -V' .94f.'J’.'A ;• J-;,:' - ; M M mkm •i- i ‘>*-' 1.. r0rteH — DohJ —Soflj-gJ MU — Pr*^»r« Xe^i/rA Se^0*<c the No inc tu or enc V> O ' •-Q^. Certiilrate of Survey frr Howard W. MeatThor estate showing proposed subdivision jn JjOverrirr.-ent. l/>t 4» Section r;-Lx/—«3 <: t ■ ■» To^al dfCA • I 1 hereby certify thrit this ir c Iru- unn rorrect, repre- cor.t^.itior cf n survey of t!. : N'ur.cior:'t vr.at 'VjtI o’ 0<5verr.r/.-nt Lot 4, Sertior. f. Township 117 TOorth, Rnnro 2? V:oit of the 5th Principe-.’. >iirl'uur, lyinn Kortn of the North lino of tho pint of l.o'r.'i Linda, nr. i the location of nil exls inr buUdinnr th^roor.. Jt does not purporl tc. show oV.er ...Tr-ve.ontn or "cnr.roactir.ents, exce.nt the »iprro:<: rote lof .tion (S exi;?t:i:p cii.?‘jways. 7Q*=>0 1» =■• IOC V—O^tk0 Iron ranker * GORDOK R. COFFI!^ CC., INC. ................. , Reg.^Kc. 6064 Hirk 3. Gr'’ntorj: Reg, No.12755 Land Lui’veyorr. und rlanncrc Lonj lak^, Minnesota f n i: f 1“^ n .# '* tevS: t’ -j mi ‘•V ▼'S :J| 1 . ;y- o lA lA CM M CL • Ulo o 2 < CL h- q; oCL ui c lii H cn >- lA M < •- r cn q: m O -J li. 2 CA M QC Ul ^ 2 H 3 CL O Ul a >• o H oc ttCL Ui CL>• os 0 u 2 M CL Ui 1Ui Kl CO N. CM cv evjo o -I o CL Kl CM -J I 2 <C •N4 Q *-« I e o Kl O flO ^ ro o o< 2 2 0 O O Ofin in —I -j -j Ul Ul X 2 2 < = = “ lA5 5O O o “> “) 'J' CM Oo Ul u. M 2 ^ O «« ro ^ < cvi ~i ^ -J O I X CL CL CL < CL CL *<4 a Ui Ul -J 0-4 -J -i X I <-i -J oo o ^220 <0§gg^ fO O 1 -7 ^ ^ O CL CL ">lA CL CM -J Ul O IX > CL< uj Ui ■-4 Ui I _^ oO o CAM> Ul O O «« C O CO < Oto o >j- CM CL C O O O < CL O o oz^< X « < lU Q. lu a 2: w-o ~ X <V<c a u < z ID a o f- •P •—...... 7-73 t t ‘ o<.<e& enre- rt or [nrif'c , of exist- orit:'. fi jway s • . 6064 .12755 OCT 2 01963 TYQFQ i t V 1 K) Oo sr C3 ^ ^ K» U CSJ ^ < rl5° ^03 I (0 fs. M O lA -Jm u o >- « ^ X lA O CL to in “5i -* O >- in §a K> 2< o o CD ^ C ca o o o o lA CM -J I X N < ^ O LJ IL M 3 cn yj X M Ko cn lU X M OC CD UJ UJI •j «i o lA -i -J CM M M O > > CO ^ q: d: K» o o O O K) < iA O lAa 51 ° o IA Z CM O O Q1^ o o sr IA CM I I O <0IA < << a ^ < ^ UJ CL X z< o< n on CD DC UJ IA -8R DC DC CM O IA lA IA g lU tt DC X Q O < DC O O Z UJ << >• s q; < UJ CL ui a X o: S < Z 2 O H ISa • lAl CL UJ CL to !5 CM Ul o s CL UJ Ul li. 1^ > M CM 'UJ > < slO S to “28^98u. < 2 in a H M in7SSS SS-'g . o|i CD H I- -j O tA QC CL to Ui UJ lA «S8SS ^ O CL < ^ Ul CM > CM <C O < lA S CM M lA CM _____Ul M M > Ul Ul < _ ►- H ^ S9 S ^ :SZ Z Q *A s Ul 2 CA > > M lA ^ ^ -J CL DC :h-*oo| I r a Q sI CO O lA O CO ^ lA O < <-> *A lA Z o o o g (A 0) ^ £ Ul nc c I s CLo g ^iS3 >* \ QC < Ui8||i L c - -ir ‘t. : . • . lAf CM •J in CM Ul > < H Ul lA CM §M (L UJ Z M3lA 72oo - Ul CL > UJ < ^ Oz < ^M P lA N Z lA M lA << €0 H H «J O O CL IL _ ^ UJ UJ O O P P ^ p ^ O O o lA O CL a ^ UJ 4* > CM < o o < rA _ CM M < lA•A UJ _ CM < M lA I Z CL CL -J N O UJ UJ S Q Q $ Z i 553^ o p CO CO ^ ro _ CO O 3 3 tA p ^ o rA O 3 tt 3 o 3 P P Z UJ < < >• Na ^3o g C L • • . •*. .. o . - a ■, L L L TO; FROl DAT] SUB.: Zond App] LISl Exhi Exhi Exhi Exhi Exhi Exhi Exhi The gara The t sect Pr. 1. 2. The c the c resid subje prope immed The a space story shown withi ..X TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Commission Michael P. Gaffron November 18, 1983 SUBJECT: #796 Lachlan Reed, 1500/1450 Bracketts Point Road Variance Zoning District - LR-lA Application - Variance from certain performance standards of the home occupation accessory use, zoning code section 34.043 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Application Plat Map Property Owners list Submitted Survey Survey Showing Current Property Boundaries and Ownership Remodeling Plans Owner's Note of Explanation The applicant is requesting a variance to remodel an existing garage into an office for his management consulting business. se:t?^S"3r34r(rellr"?o 1. Proposed Office space in detached building on a separate lot from owner's dwelling. 2. Employment of secretary Required Occupation must be conducted within the principal structure; Entrance to office must be gained from within that structure. No employed assistant allowed The applicant resides at 1500 Bracketts Point Road. He also is the owner of 1450 Bracketts Point Road which is separated from his residence by a 20- platted City right-of-way, and ^on which ?he sub3ect garage is located (see Exhibit E). Note that the property owners list did not include the Pillsbury property immediately adjacent to the subject garage. ^ The applicant's remodeling plans include creating two office spaces, a rest room, storage space, and adding a 12^ x 19^ LnonH story deck to the lake side of*^the structure? This deck is no? whether i^wo??5 e?c??Lhwitnin the 75 required lakeshore setback. .. . . . . . .. . .. . 1. 2. £■ ^ %fi:■ i mmm'-If #796 Lachlan Reed Page 2 Variance In order to issue a variance to the performance standards in question, the Planning Commission must make the findings set forth in Zoning Code Section 32.340 (a, b, c, d and e) . If a variance is granted, staff recommends such variance be subject to the following conditions: 3. A special lot combination be completed by the applicant, and filed in the chain of title of both Lots 1 and 3, with the following conditions: a) The accessory use shall be permitted only as long as the applicant owns both Lots 1 and 3. Any new ownership of either lot would auto matically terminate the accessory use, and the new owner would have to reapply for a variance to the home occupation section. b) The remodeled structure cannot be rented out and shall not be considered a legal rental unit. Existing on—site system must be inspected and approved for this use by on-site manager. If Planning Commission feels this deck is a necessary or allowable feature of the application, applicant must provide a survey showing all setbacks and apply for a variance to the non-conforming use section of the code, (this is an expansion of a non-conforming structure) s to M S3 CL H 141 SM H o 3 14. z cnM tt I4J V H* 141 a V o h-ss s u zM Kl N. CVI ttl K U H- tt O OI4J 141 ^ I4i I4J O ^ M *i «J M • _ 10 X z p <lo ^ u u a I lO H < < I III «J -I 10 I •o ^ H M U < < H I < 141 N tt «c «i ^ ; ^ CD o ! ^ <0 CO < ^ <<01 HOI _ lo o: K o : 0 -^ < < m ro c lO M s s141 M o K ft tt fO H lo H141 Kl X CM U I < H ft -i 0 -J X M U U CL Sjjo I mJ I4J «i 0 0 < < 0 0 H H O ^ ft ft O ft a o < ft q o z CL O 8! “ 5141 CL \ I4J X < O H < Z |is9 tt <CL IM a o z XeI;: *. ♦ *• , • • • V I.'V ,. ' '• »* *. ., >• -V • 4 ^ 1 * - ;•• . • » ■K- ; :>•.>•.1'..’ 'mm '■r ' ■ ^' ■ '.>. * • ! • .. . ••* • • •. • • . ? ’ • * .* ■ * ^ . •• t. ^ • • * • • . * * * •• • * t* . . 4 ' ' .. • . ••• » . • ’* • '.'V’ . '•* a• • 'r .-•»••* '• • * **V S .^ . ' -*i » • • , • •! 7 • . “ .• • '.■•.. ‘V. •’ ^ .A •_ - • !. ... • . •■■ .•■ <•'.• •'.', •. -.. »;..• ..... :• • . .. :••; . •• ,' . ^ . --V V’i'-- • ' •'*• "* * , r** ‘ ♦. <*• . V « . 't 'ya-’-. v V .• ;. .V y. ■ : V . •. •i . • . L* . . • * . •» ; ‘ ' . - ■ • tv C . •;. ' i ■ • - ' I '•* ■ ' V;} •>■•!, XT.CV * ■ VI f. :v i'. k. V V ,, ;. .K -yt : V . . V /"'*’•** \ •yT/''’.* . ‘i • ’ y * " * V ' . / i - f/ ■ - yi« • * ' • ♦ * , ^ -r ., -.•*./. r,'<r- V. y- :■•■■!■■; vy • >.• :;.- .:*• * ^ V 1 •* - • .. • 7. S t J yi i.y-**• f• *. ••»♦ '•0 f'th • rn.it i' l i il ..' . • If y .i * 1w ^r* 1 •* 11 i J/ e • V\\11mfj J V • 4# ^ .... I I r=ir=r--=.-Litfc=: Jl~ ...•«. ..4. _____ II =pf * i -J : } f I ? I i ; i1 k 1 « ! ; 11 — : i J ^« I t •ihniijH » - I I I: . I • ; 1 • 1 W • • . I • • '1 * «-i ' ? • f |lTj ii.* • •« 4 - ' ^ • .y- • t ir fel/£»r^/e5 j^yOLY// Ofpi^c / (OuT- iT/ (NV fsfcJ Vi.^1 YE 6 ecae.- A ®6eA(c t IMO.S. V ‘ *i. ** 8». I 1 .1 <m IS COf^SOknNG ... \fiV0L'^lN6 AoX\ViTitS AWAY F-^OC^ OPPi^c. A^ (DuT-sTAre A n T) ABPOA^.................... NO It<veuro^Y, NO n OT?^a ])b ^ fv/o V«SiT0Ci (F^WE^ ( ri-AN l^-l^ S6CC.e.TA'^v N£:CE6 sA^'/ lYA‘L flAoME CON'tAC'^ ^UtL|N6 ^/N^iP/US A %Sy6^HO 0. OUT -STATI c Afe\?OA^ APPROX, t MOi. (OuT OF I'Z-- •; . .'.* ^ :. *i* :•:. • ^ , - »..* - ••■ • 1' ^ ’ Act t P.ITY OF OROit \ •: ■• !■ #7 O ;; i':. .>: ;••• ■;• -^ ' ■ •■•■• ’ ‘ '• ''" ’ Zoning Di Applicati' Lot area : Lot area i Variance List of E Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J The appli this lot lot width land is a the end o City gran to "Tract into whic division. On-site 1 The resui this tesi questions on the sj A lot area subject to A building Excavation and the ex V>-;>• . * . > *. • • • •,••::•••!• (t T'. i l> • ■ .y -I- j • . ^•S t-I * " . ^ -.V •- ! -v-rflii ■ r • "ji.; i'-. i TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Members Michael P. Gaffron, Septic Systems Manager November 17, 1983 #799 “ Bruce & Terry Clark - 1180 Lyman Avenue - Variance Zoning District - RR-IB - Two acre minimum Application: Lot area variance Lot area required Lot area existing Variance - 87,120 sq.ft. - 68,171 sq.ft. - 18,949 sq.ft. or 22% List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Survey Exhibit D “ Surveyor * s statement of lot area Exhibit E - Survey of access easements to Tract A Exhibit F - Existing easement agreement Exhibit G - Planning Commission and Council minutes dated September 26, 1977 Exhibit H - List of property owners Exhibit I - Septic test report Exhibit J - Proposed house layout The applicant is requesting a variance for construction of a home on this lot at the end of Lyman Avenue. The lot exceeds the minimum 200' lot width and the proposal meets all required setbacks. No other adjacent land is available. Access to the lot is over a private roadway off the end of Lyman Avenue. Current private easements on file with the City grant a driveway easement across the Whitehead and Pexa properties to Tracts A & C", but do no indicate whether this includes both lots into which Tract A has been historically divided by a metes and bounds division. On—site testing was done on the lot in 1977 and again in 1978 or 1979. The results of the more recent testing have not been submitted, but this testing was instigated by the City On-Site Manager as a result of questions about the feasibility of placing the proposed mound systems on the sites previously tested. A lot area variance was approved by the Council for this lot in 1977, subject to proper access easements and an approved septic system design. A building permit for a new home was issued on October 4, 1977. Excavation was done on the lot but no construction ever was commenced and the excavation was later filled in at the request of the City. m- r. ■^ ,v, ^ » 4f i it ’ > •F ■■ li *' V I-*.' m #799 - Bruce November 17, Page 2 Staff recomim & (e), that ] requested, si 1. Provide ( Tract A 2. Satisfy 1 treatment snue - Variance i September 26, 1977 >f a home on i minimum 200* No other adjacent roadway off Lie with the ?exa properties les both lots :es and bounds 1978 or 1979. nitted, but ^ IS a result of sound systems lot in 1977, ; system design , 1977. ras commenced the City. #799 - Bruce & Terry Clark November 17, 1983 Page 2 Staff recommends approval based on Zoning Code Sec. 32.340 (a)(b)(c)(d) no other land is available, and that no other variance is reguested, subject to the following conditions: evidence of access/driveway easements to this portion of Tract A - - ^- - - - 2. Satisfy the requirements of the on-site code for an on-site sewage treatment system ^ 0 (b) (c) (d) riance is tion of te sewage • t • I I . r /A J * • * • .|S *:iSi ' ;-^-':-’V":- ••:.v K -•V-*.' .!‘V .-• p. . - il5^ vr.:- urvf*y ;:o. ir«*7 Vxf,%J kJ S. ^ • nortlTlr^^^ o^ T liOTtl^** C*«? l^[i©liOW\Mf^ ^ OCT 2 fi i9a? r f 1 ! rtJ *i.rvoy c*:rth-, wxjirjirr ,or\%.!i * £ITY OF QROijO I ....... ......n- I,,.- »*orrt>rt rrtprpffcntation 'if a <^rr»'*y'r;:n ‘ r|f. r«»l* »•»^T’lv * ^ *" * ’ ^**®*^^ •* lylur Kftst^rlv o'* i i:*^. ^^int in tho |n- . ♦»«__/,* 1 7 -TTiri. ,i; tnanro rini.-^h»»-*:-- .’•orthoant rprr.*'^ o^ Vi*- i • • ^ o. 1«(J Ifcet ^er^. iVr'r. *t . rH‘Titr or lnr*mvo-Tcntr . ‘ ‘ ‘ ^ ru^rort to ;.hov en/T- rS- • • I 5r.fclc ; Ihto : 0 • t 1" ?: l:v • •• U-17-7f Iron !*cirkf:j*Surveyor *irc ?lf •'Onr lr.y.o, Ki;inosr.ta »:uicr 1 t I I, i "i , i:%:-\ V.:’' ■' pif! i' ii" i iri/H. ■ ■ ■.. f.': If mt XSdr?- I'i. V'V? H -}■■■- I ‘r.i ■ - ^ r.-' r ■' .'■ I’-'- 'X ruJ urvfy i;o. ir-'7 3ta I?.-; ^ •:?'--^si6:,'i 4 4 « Mff;> IT*D GORDON R. COFFIN LAND SURVCVOR AND PLANNER 3021 WATERTOWN ROAD LONG LAKE. MINN. 1939E #305*, ' : n-.f ^j r. >r;-’ . u. . \ • * :• a •*- i- • 47J*4I4I 8-26-77 • 4. • • .* >------- Mr, David 0. FilVins 110 Smith Avenurt Wayzata*. Minn. • Dear Mr. Filkins: This is to certify to you that trio following-describod property; « That pert of Tract A lyinr, Sasterly of a line romroencing at the most Northerly comer of Tract A; thence Southerly to a point in the South line thereof a distance of 120 feet West fix>:u the Northeast corrior of Tract P, Regis tered I^nd Survey No. 1067, contnins l.>6f. aoi-f^s approxiwitely. Tours tnxly, Gordon il. Coffin G.o£ r/4' ,-r Lr- * » ^ »-,• V ; r:- E f t, ’ :^. icing Iherly 120 is- W. [•.''OTJJ ; •V; wm.Sketch for iX imld C. I'.open of pioposcd d; Ivovoy onscnicnt in nm! »idjoining Ucglstcrod Line Survey Kr, 1067 Hennooin County, Minnesota 1w 0 xJ 1 4 1 V- d1 ■o f11 *> r-t-^rsl ‘1 0IlO 1f 4- lO ••• 1 i 1 1 ! ^ 1 V d ..C U eftO 47 rvA.*t • • •• ^ • • • A-7?* •'So C.<Lt C rT4 C l\A' T I »•.! ’ r.*• •• c .« >«■; } . HI Ne7®45'40'V-’704.5 !*iy‘^:;ent over Tracts A nnd E l"nat puj-t of T^^rt.s A nnrl B, Uegisterod ;-!r:.i survey No. 1067, files of Registrar of Titloc, Cc’.inty of Hennepin, lyinj; vj thin 15 I’oot on each side of tb.c fc'lloving-dcsrri’tied rc;.terlino : Corr.icncinr at the Souihvcst corner of said Tract B; thenco on ar; assumed beiirinp, cf Nortli 87°45'40" West on the Vestorly extension of the South line of scic Tract B a dlrUir.ee of 13 feet to the point of hcglnnini; of the center line being described; fnence I'orth 14°20' E;»st ti distance of 6v,32 feet; tnence along u tangential cun-e to tho right having a rudius of 120 feet and cenlrel angle of 47® a distance of 9H.44 foot; ibience North 61®2C Ssr.t a dls- t/ir.ce of 97,RO feet; thence eleng n tangential curve to the right having a radius of 730 foot and central au(.l*j of 1?® a distance of 152.89 foot; thence North 73^20' ‘dast a distance of 290.63 feot; thence along ui tangontial curve to t!io right hevlng a radius of 120 feet and cent.rsl angle of 72° e dlsUmre of 15C.80 feot, and there ending. Kgrarncnt within elat of *'0rono Orchards ” That port of Charles Street vacated, and of l*ots 25 end 26, "Orono Orchards*', lying within 15 feet on caci; uiOv of the folloving- dcrcriU.*'! rer.torllne: Corinionrinj: at tho Southwest corner of the £ouUi'‘ust cunrler of Section 35, Towrrb.ip 118 North, Itenge 23 Vest of the 5th Principal Koridian; thence on on assVine::• V«e:.rin/ of North 67°45'40” West on the ‘wosterly extnr.r.Lon of ft,*' South line of told Southeast ouartcr a distance of 13 feet; thence Nortli 14°20' iiast. a distance of 100 feot to the point of beginning of the centerline bolng described; thunro South 14°20' West a di.ata.'ico of 160 feet; thence along a tangential curve to tho right having u rudius of 140 feet end cenLiul i:r.j,lo of 50° a dist:.r.(;H of 122.17 feet, end there •ir.cini,.’ L Scale : 1" = Lite ; 4-12J ^ 4. - £2O r?Mpfar; •Sordor. h. Coffin Heg. No. 5064 Alvin H. iiehdor iteg. No. 13295 Li.mu Surveyors sr.c Planners Long Le ke, Ki line sota y .1 fx\ L « :n Jm t REGULAR MEET I4r. Alan 01s Administrate in9 memo con David Filkin 1977, which The applican ion of a new off the end minimum 200 all required (68,171 sq. percolation high water t This indicati should be re' prior to any over a privai road passes 1 Pexa, and pe] lot. Evidenc should be rec Lot area reqi; Planning Comir Received let approval sub and to City ; design. Council Meetir Butler moved variance reqi ‘Avenue, per i of September Alan 01s Administrate following me of Douglas H September 13 The applicar this propert Council on C width and se for construe the required There is no the side and with utility j?iYir¥iT ^ r:: ■ •*' ; ■ ■ ; '<'"1 ■ ■ MS- B, Its!t;is teird !r;J vennepin , lyin;; i rci.lcrlino: 3 on »«?; jissuir.ed or cf;*2 Goulh Line Innini.; of the conter- 01 6v.3^ feet; Lus of 120 feet and th 6l®20' Ssnt a dis- ho rii’ht huvin{: a 152.H9 foot; thence ^ tangential curve istance of 150.80 t vacated, and of '.‘v of the follovinij- c,unrter of ridian; thence on on Ui»' 5ouU> lire of t. jt di.-tunce of 100 nec South U®20‘ West havinf u radius of e er.clni,. ■g;* ffln Heg. Ko. 6064 idor ilet;. Ho. 13295 >rr- 3 no Plannors ‘.iivnesota V. i 'f iu \ 4 % r.- i ■.i f .:v ■p' '* • * * * ■ m ■ A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 26, 197ff) V. 2T0 1 vm^v '.^rr iiO‘- . . : I *r 97RW Olson, Assistant Building & Zoning \>^IANCE Da?irPilF “^;lF* ar:a^SnceM°"'°“‘ HH 1977, which"states- August 31, David Filkins • v-ich sctoiec;: Inn requesting a variance for construct- Off .Ur aetached garage on this lot Lyroan Avenue. The lot exceeds the inxraum 200 ft. lot width and the proposal meets toB 1-565 acres^ ft.) according to the surveyor. The borings indicate occasional Th?^ to 3 ft. from the surface. u ^ mount type septic system which should be reviewed and approved by the engineer prior to any variance. The access to this lot is over a private road off the end of Lyman. The road passes through the properties of IHiitehead, and perhaps Bergerson before reaching this should easements for this accessshould be required prior to any variance. Lot area required: 87,120 sq. ft.; Actual - 68,171 sq. ft. Variance - 18,949 sq. ft. = 22% Planning Commission Meeting - September 19, 1977 design Engineer’s approval of septic system Council Meeting - September 26, 1977 p ember 19, 1977. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) Olson, Assistant Building & Zoning record the^ concerning a front setback variance Scotch Pine Lane, L^ed September 13, 1977, which states: VARIANCE 2425 Scotch Pine Lane #314 Douglas Hill on the Pf a swimming pool within Therrir^o^otLI^’ (street) setback, the required 50 ft thl sidl 2nd re^I Practical location because Th^re ?.<, nn ofL" with completely filled lity lines and the septic system. (Continued) 1IP ill <Pf? /:• 1'- .4'* • • li mm-■■■ "'V'-V^vir I. ’B'iTage T? \aCE Lyman Avenue I Filkins h ictoicif; 2^:I •. t. = 22% s Hill nued) ICE icotch Pine Xane i 50 it., f'l j| • ^rd of-hoT- n . ,. ^ I Irw •O »H M CL • Ulss Ui OS lU i; M H g M Z C/) M tt UJ ft o lU CL >- O K g“ly CM N CM CM m ^ 12 > H ^ < lii § - Spg «J UJ ^ o t ft lA UJ moo M O' O Ul n < > lA -i < lA >5g fA fA CM I CO O O Ulu u > N I CA I M M H -J -J fA X -J «J «-« H Ul Ui p lA 6 UJ Ul M> >- g^z CA o «• ®5w Q g2o hi lA CM O UJ 55 lA X CMg CO >-z Ul COs c^ »A lA UJ lA r < Ulo z z S2?£ I lA Kl O UJ 1^ CO »A O 2z r O ^ H < O N Z >-O *H < z CM Ul lA > ^ < O' fA Ul •0 -I lA iSSS!“‘ss* • w w > lA UJ UJ ^ lA O ^ -J o CM «0 ^ lA O •A CM I CO ^ -J UJ ««i < H ft ft O < < €> X X CM u u N >- ft UJ UJ fA ^ O 2 ®> >0 CM Ui ftM lA O P NO CA ft fA O HZ O lA Ul UJ Ul ^^ Ul fA o Z • Z m > lu *> z in __ CA CM < O H ft I C Z UJ < €> X O UJ CD PSK lA K>Ui Z N CO fA O -JO ' X -I COft 'O -I O O (^ CL fA fA CM I I CM M) CM O o fA U H -I J5 g Ul Ul X Z 23 lAfA lA lA U. U. O O X o V >• O 10 M M o Q U U >• >• ft ft ft ft Ul UJ fS exhibit O S >- Ul < ^ H O U. Z2§8 ES“-< ® Z UJ _ M CD < o CL a X M UJ UJ ^ Ul blu Z X ZM UJ X H CA Ul ft Ul X >-Uigu UJ U. Up M ft O O V S S§111 f—^ ’. \v/c-^ " » ii —i li « gg i OCT 2 61983 1 i n 2 a JW CITY OF QRQNO lU 0 Ul (9 >r n.o iDWilf • - 161963 ij [• • ORONO Ko* -U- lOAO Oar lend Lone M* Inlay zata, .iinneaota ^^>91 AMguat 21» 1977 4-7? -5 ° :4r. Dave rilkine 110 Sodth Avenue Vayzeia^ Minneaota ^^91 Dear Sirt #7 r Cn Auguot 20 end 21 • 1977 aix percolation teste and two soil borings were performed on a part of Tract A, Registered Lend Survey No. 106? in OroDo* .'Minnesota. The location of these teats are shown on the attached sketch. The results of the percolation tests are as followst Rate of abeorption In oinuteg per inch 120 48 average 42 ain. each Pare Tost n-A P2-A P5-P ?4-P P5-r P 6-P <50). 60)average 60 min. 3ased on the Minnesota IndividufI Sewage Disposal 8yaten Code, I^nioua Standards Hecomaended by the )dnnesota Department of Healthy the drainfield in the area of P^*P and p4->? would require 290 s.f of absorption area per bedroom or 1*22 sq. ft* per gallon of waste per day.. A drainfield in the area of P-^P end P6*r would reqtire ^30 s.f. of absorption area per bedroom or 1.6^ s.f per gallon of waste per day* The area of Pl-A is not suitable since the percolation rate is less than the minimum allowable rate of 60 minutes per inch* If you have any questions regerding these tests please sail me* III \ OCT 2 61983 ! i Yours very truly, ^OSn» Carl b. Borg P.E. ^ )Clnn. Reg. #7^60 niTY OF OROjj • • • • '1 '<\ ; t j • •1 • •• • . 1 ...• .r. I . ; :• t. : • A•• • J . • •. *• g • ••....• . . • • • • L ••r 1 •« »4«« « • ! •'» . »». .• ■ •• • • •. • *•• •• •* » •• •» « » • • • 0 . . J. . * wH\-—V —% ■■ w S2i>'pm/^ > ^ i-V I .'1,1 I- - 1 If ‘ . '* 'f 4 L-js^andu: ^ u s»««SK;;ssw#» Ns H ■HV.V ...... ,-: • Q t:-.; 8 I >. r- So 8! J r. 1 V MlAU1N31 8; w 'c E.9? ^ O = JC ^ I ® ^ ^ ■9 W T3 Q) E C JO ^ 0) w ®CO Q — ^ 0) CO ¥: <0 SbHz■? 25 ® 0) «.2? ® ^5e Q> f ® s< ~ » CO 8 J2 -5 I S ® w § o|•— ♦-* O) ^ C CO c (0 Q) CO o) w E = I! 1.1?« ~ j;^ ^ <0 O) *c (0 *0 .£ 42 T3 5 =§ .iS&^CO ® J2^S E ET5 01 o oj V 8; 8;; > 5 ™ “ i 5 i2 8 w ® ^ c Ic Si ? 0) ^ S E Q-§? 8-.ti ° o ®-D-S r=K S > >'J2 g|E ‘ ^'rZ 0) (/> W C ® © ^ — c 1= cvi c >» <5 = CLqJ III ® o iz ^ © Q) £ C I ••“ O >'.'5:^ ^|-«tIl|j5 s 8 ^ “ 3 T3 O -o ^ © © O2= ^ © g O O .E i t M < crJ fLIi: (5^i ;r ,i!.' O c s ‘n pV*p- . •■,;..•,■■ W*’:: «l V--;: t'^%. • f. .■> w‘'.Sj- 'iJ'-'v' . ;' !. ■ /k. ; - .•^' V * ”■ s4 Jv/ Zoning Di Applicati Lot area Lot area Variance Lot width Lot width Variance List of E Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Mr. Burne on the si Staff has 1. The e: is in 2. Sewe r the p; 3. No ot: Staff rec (e), the WJ V-.9 s'Sl ^ m *0) -C ^^•S J P1 “• ®0 I-: £ <1) E/i r- CO r* ^ u9 ^ ® £ .9 CO o c D^'S >3 o '-g >'■0 = -fc “ 1 ffl S? 5 i s 5 S " « ■' ° * - <» c 2 x: (B .Egs5,= . J• v*%*< ■'M r^^.T i ■■s l^>'' M r;r f </•'-'c/.■•'il <v;' ■" P. * i *i . »’■ a -V ^ jLg»<ii| <v.<^ __.1 Sin ife''r'T:;'^tSiti ■•j kJB :-i :'v ■ T^ I .f: ■iiiiLii.::.- ”-:;3 ^v=P- Planning Conimission Members Tom Jacobs, Building Official November 14, 1983 #800 - Thomas J. Burnevick Northern Avenue Zoning District - LR-IC Application: Lot Area & Lot Width Variance Lot area required - 21,780 sq. ft. Lot area existing - 7,500 sq. ft. Variance - 14,280 sq. ft. or 65% Lot width required - 100' Lot width existing - 50• Variance - 50' or 50% List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Survey Mr. Burnevick is requesting a variance to remove the existing house on the site and build a new one. Staff has reviewed the project which revealed the following items; 1. The existing structure on the property has been vandalized and is in very poor condition 2. Sewer (1983) and water (1982) assessments have been levied against the property. Sewer assessments were paid in full 3. No other land available Staff recommends approval based on Zoning Code Sec. 32.340 (a)(b)(c)(d) & (e), the above findings, and that no other variance’is requested. ’1 n •• .• PB, s <1 il iJ } *. ♦' . ■1< INSTRUCTIONS; f-f [' h PlcAse fin (Type or Pi describe y< 1. PROPERTY A1 Legal description 2’. APPLICANT ; 3. OWNER Name J Msllln{ Date Prope I (do) (do AGENT — Firm __ Kalllni 5 . NOTICES Sho 6. PRESENT ZC 7. PRESENT US - - + V. ■ n Avenue isting house wing items: dalized and levied against 340 (a) (b) (c) (d) & requested. :ri t i. ^ % .3 fl * -■-gSy ^^■•■£1.'W ‘>.v: m mr"*' t LAND USE PLANNING ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION EXHIBIT ^ '^4 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323 1*7^.7357 . ^ t • < IHSTRUCTTONS: Please first read the attached Information Shcet^ - - - - - - -- (Type or Print). If needed, attach letter or other Infor^tlon to better describe your request. Incomplete applications will not be accepts a . >-■, LIST OF EXHIBITS property address 3C»</Q' ii^- Havairre , Legal description shall be shown on attached Survey, Exhibit 3 APPLICANT Hatae TllQmAQ T. RurneyiW_ Phone 7gg-S'/0 ^ Mailing Address ^ ^---------------f---------------------------- If Applicant la not owner, explain 3. OWNER Name feo>V*>Phone Date o^iober jwyx _ l"(L) (drnot) also own other adjacent parcels of land Phone AGENT w*"'®----------------------------------- Flm Hailing Address NOTICES Should be sent to; \ Applicant Owner Agent present zoning use district 7. PRESENT USE Residential -------- (Other) Vacant Buildlng(a)Occupied BuildlngCs) DeaerlPtlon Initial APDllcatlon must include: Application Form .. Property (Vners List Certificate of Survey Fee Receipt # LS£A!7 Date R^clvcd Inventory Staff Coimncnts Other Information TJCTTTBBJ CITY OF ORONO til. ..C 1 =51 ■ I w- -:.n ill • v ’ M OF EXHIBITS D#fierlntlon >pllcntlon ide; pllcutlon Fofftfi ♦ opcrty CVn«if# Lift irtlflc«t€ of Survoy >e Receipt # .celved rrwatlon Plat Map Inventory Staff Coimcnts 1 formation a«| 1 Hb3 )) ORONO q: — Kl UJ cvj o o I o a o < m d: UJ u in X o CVI I- -J I CC -Jr* o o -4X0. o o lii (> > m ^ < in uo X ^ q: -J UJo X X a. H X Of UJ O NiZ 5 o < < in 3 UJ CC tt £ o o «< q: o UJ O < Q Z UJ < < >- \ CL UJ Q. £ tt CL UJ O Z X < “ 3 ^ ^ a o H s§a o til Of £ o •< tt a z UJ < > N tt < Ul UJ a £ z X < 3 < Z O H UJ K ^ 5o < oc g O Z UJ < < V N K < ^ Q. UJ CL £ 0 5 5« 3 ^01 O H t-* •i-Jif iT'l V ; .. •• m’m 5Woortxer of Lof4 rrjer ot BToJc^. : .* ’ • _ M — * ^ . 6. p^rZur*.* »!< ,. ^V' •/' WS ••-■' iMai 1® P: - ^ W OCi 3 I ->B3 £tTY OF uRONQ f cu:'v •.'■.•^.■c r^i *“if {(• f' rv*1 * *% •*• V» ^ # • ^ r*v> * • < »««•> % ^ i\ }•*. ^ : \.r r . r* / I t '. ^ I ' ? • * *. ^ ••#•»* i* \ t • •• -..A**.** i. *• . •\«.l^t ^ • 4. ••> \J I r.M'oly f-erli’.y th :t/ ti.ii ij- a true .uc czirvit''’. jo*’r-jr.enLatioii ci" a piii'vo.v of the l-curu.:-.: :*i^;ii of tiial oart of Ix>t 6, Bloc/, if, Tc\».'iK.ite of Lt r:»:dcn Park, c-'..frll--.' -.ii: fcltcvs: :'^-i.in:;int ‘ ai thv, w‘^‘» *-•*•-*.* •<» w * J j t.* Korth •-.l:r.[ the V.v'jl lino cf suici lot •*i dirtance of IfC foot; thjnc*; uofJ.-ct- ir.^ r’«:r.t a iii ter.c-r of ;0 fe .t; t: f'iO T;c!r.t c;‘ U-;. in:.:?•;•; AfD •f W oc.rt cf foitrcrn i.voru«:, vucatou, lying botv;ecr. the lioutr/i-rly extonsionp of tho ar.c V.ept lir.cp of said soove- c^'seribod p: ooorty , arc the Iccatior. of all exist!ny build- t'r.irc.or. It dees net rurport to show other iirprnve.'.ents or cncroachr.ents. Cordon R. Coffin Rt I#>nd Surveyor and ?la:iner Long *^.»ke, Minnesota i He. oC'CA Scale D’.te o 1" - 30’ 9-3C-82 Iron raitrlcer 1 J ■••1 ■ « ■ iiMMMfca— 'r/-!?''* TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Zoning Dist Applicatior Lot area re Lot area e» Variance Lot width I Lot width e Variance List of Exh Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Mr. Munsell Staff has r 1) The pro setback Lot has 3) There i on two 4) Existin Februar Staff recom: (d) & (e). Li i{- a true c.r a f.ui'Vtiv cart of l,cit 6, Vdcn Pork, ' . *5 r» ? |T» . - *- * 1 lot; thuuf 0 : cf caici lot th-jnc'• uo r J. j c t - o:' ;0 fe L: r.1.0 Mi:* I : : c*,- V 4 ... . «* W « 4 ^ ■: AfLi that vucatau, lyina ’ Lansiorir of the lid aoove- ^xistirii- build- •;t rurport to 3r cncroec.h.7.erts. • TO;Planning Commission Members FROM:Tom Jacobs, Building Official DATE;November 15, 1983 SUBJECT:#802 - John Munsell - 4100 North Shore Drive - Variance Zoning District - LR-IB Application: Lot Area & Lot Width Variance Lot area required Lot area existing Variance 43.560 sq. 10,000 sq. 33.560 sa. ft. (one acre) ft. ft. or 77% Lot width required - 140 * Lot width existing - 50' Variance - 90* or 64% List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Survey Mr. Munsell is requesting a variance to construct a new house. Staff has reviewed the project which revealed the following items; 1) The proposed location of the structure meets all required zoning setbacks 2) Lot has been assessed for sewer in 1983 3) There is no other land available. The property has park property on two sides 4) Existing cabin was condemned by 'the City and removed by owner in February, 1983 Staff recommends approval based on Zoning Code Section 32.340 (a)(b) (c) (d) & (e), the above findings and that no other variance is requested. i V t - a I 4 ‘ i;i H m lO ^ Ma • liigo IL I teJ tt lU s; M H M II.z in M B lii ii “■cO E yj CL O E z Ma lU 5 CM Ul #- u H lA 10 >•to 3 CM X CL I o CL yj N M UJ > •N X 3 Himt < O I 10 eio ^ fi _ ^ «i lU• <r ^ -I to o CD o lU 3 CO >-to M lij^ z p m CL lii I CO #• O ^ ffl S eg yj O CD CD to to t to CM lii I MXCOCLi I CD Z lii I M < ID : Z Z CL I•N lii . I z z I ^ ^ : O CO O 10 O li. I ^ -J o • CO ^ < lii I to lii I CL Z I O < CL I O Z Hi • CL • tt lii Z ^ OC Sf o to tt UJ Chtt r o z ^ i. S8 -I n o tt ^ CD to S 6 3 o in lU lil oyysiga-o CD S r * QC < bJ a uj a z P.5< £ c^ in to CM I CDin COto in to CM I I ts^ €ClU lUin in lUi<5s tt z in ^ u z 3 in _ < CO in r M £o 5 u z o z M o u £ 8 z in K X o «J ui o CO a > -> ^ r ro < >-H Mu totot-IU UI in to IU o m inCM1£CO z in m o CM1 o z z inO IUMUM X -J m _SS" 1 X ^gg %3..“?z o z _ III Hi h- >• H < H -I H M <muz § iU iiM M II. U.o o III IU I- H H Hm m DC < IUa IU a zo z X < J J J 1 0( CM O O UI g ^ m to X CM t- I a r:§ In*o m in CO vf to o «o to in K in mlu IU to §ogi UI CDz tt g lu ^ z "’8k I tt tt a z z IU M IU H m O IU O DC O ^ X^ m to X CM t- I OC I fvo ^ z IU M IU tt K 5 -J OC IU o 3 CM 6 lUo a to o in _ in in m ^ to o o ur -> M _ iSi UI O DC O O O 4* to CM I Mz g I u. ®gUI COto < t- t- Mm u o to UI zz z o ^ z z z o IU zz z o zIUoo < z o o < z o o < z a oHoo Z UI < < \ O Z IU <O Z UI <o << >- \< >- N.< <0:0 UI < >- \ tt < UI a Ui Q. z o S S a Z < z a o H J 7 EXHIBIT O to CQo CD & o to CM I :: gg I u. u. O O M M tL Og < z o Z Ul< >• N K < Ui UI CL Z •i- iii m Vt ’aai rj ■ N « fell-% t; fiTw - i*"r^i T> kr.. mfii pmy ':1V;';'•/ . ■’ ’1 h V >.• I ,, : ,'i; iiiiir / ''"'Ssfi 1 ' (t- f ?4;1 (Z2^ POison C.S2 Ac. iy) l(*>) I fig 1 f* \ f •/ / ’ ■ j>r. ■ >' Af4 [lOlOWlfr^ • •• » • « -mm^u , w «r« '''■ - 8 IS83 CITYIIF ORO'-' »exhibit - \». r •'h'i'. I*6^ ^ » N55 ’;/ / /i>>C 0 €.OJjon 0 4} Ac. C^) \QSO(f) SUMinnt\ *47.5 il iC4 735T V ^84 * .V ii M. 'J/» '1^ ■ >l‘-a "U .A%) \l \t WMA 0 /-^ ^7^)./,^^- •*r-‘/(W/“f <?.^' li?/* /' ♦«n» V > » :• ^1 ?) A K 5 l&fe / V I 27 li 5/V 2|n25' 24 l^/«- A ^Vi /;>• >^f*\i iv\ ’A "V\ II \*. !"■ u 7* * / lbr> k •,. . • 3^67^et .^»>rSwM fie ■rl‘-*7:f.i ii^i^ i‘l 'if' i r:,*i1^, .-T . -;:^.v-.r *»V •», » -■ \jf‘: •{•.*■. its wMl - ,»^|!^nfT-■ 9VRI! *Vr ‘.. 'U F=rJ»» >1 tvri Vl .*• -vv..-. f; LEGAL 1 Lot 70. MINNETC the rec Hennepd fH©o MOV- £LTY0I DEMARS-C LAND SURVE SOMHtrborl Plymouth Mi Phono: <ei2): a'^.r 900) SU \U0 '' \' » -44 ' iS ^84 ^ « 1 \ ^ s VxJ fe'r ^ ii T ZL-.vnr:--" - fT-’ ^jf’. •' •fl f !t<-' \n . v*l ■'■I#. 'm .M ^ i M 4 <y*r -iHH "AFv ;. pPWH 1-,. ■ ■n- ■ i^ -''it,-. .. .fc'- • -■m t S'. m FOR: CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY John Munsell •f %Po LEGAL DESCRIPTION; Lot 70, HIGHWOOD LAKE. MINNETONKA, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. / / ' - '*«/i ^ / Mnv-81983 I?ITY OF OROMn Ifh H?Ki ^«wt. ^sft,yo'/ I o« / t^6.i o/\>« - »?« ff- ^« Otnottt iron monumtnt D«notM offwt stakt OtnotM Misting titv. OinotM Propossd ti«v. OtnotM surfact draintg* Proposad garaga floor alav, 'U ■•¥ ;t -■'j DEMAR8 - GABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 3030 Harbor Lana No. Plymouth MN SS441 Phona: (612) SSO-OOOO <r V Proposad lowest floor elav.» ^*5 Proposad top of foundation elev. « 964* 5 o BENCH MARK: Top of M.«. iOO ftc^ e*i(c»l'^ ®f C»r 0 f U4 70 ^leoA^iftn •> If any. tharaon. and all visiblc^roachmepH^(f any. from or on said land! As surva^ by me thfi/ fn^'; (jL qj,_______^0\J. iq 83. 19 in. Pile No. Book - Page m-yj '40 K- \ I - :: W-' •■'./ vm i'c * L^'. ■ Mm 4:4 Sketch 1. Planne family 2. Rezoni to RR- List c Exhibi Exhibi The PI propos per bu locate and ne etfeaotP’ m. l«8.se titv. ■ ^^6*5 lation elev. = ^64» 5 o of 100 frcV of Ur 9 f ♦ 70 (WA^ien j98>9S ey of lingi, land. Filt No. 1 Book — Page 1 /03-37 1 Scale 1 l“'40 1 r4 I A A u > • L- i r-; i-.- -,„V \i. ■ ^>sk;-- ,^v TO; FFOM; DATE: SUBJECT; Planning Coininission Members Michael P. Gaffron, Septic Systems 'Manager November 18, 1983 #801 - Painter's Creek Development Corporation 4680 Bayside Road (Old Ski Tonka Site) Sketch plan and conceptual review of the following: 1. Planned residential development of this 72.6 acre site into 20 single family lots 2. Rezoning from RR->1A (single family rural residential, five-acre minmum) to RR-IB (single family rural residential, two-acre minimum) List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Sketch Plan Exhibit B - Comprehenvise Plan Section The Planning Commission is asked to conceptually review the applicant's proposal for a 20-lot single family PRD with an overall density of 3.4 acres per building site. The proposal calls for building sites generally located on the ridge areas, leaving common areas at the base of the slopes and near Bayside Road. General questions to be considered should include: - Proposed method(s) of ownership of individuval and common property - On-site sewage treatment system provisions Concept of rezoning this property - Note: it is adjacent to the RR-IB two-acre zone; see also attached section of the Comprehensive Plan dealing with rural residential land use U5cat % V. i-'-f URBAN INDUSTRI Orono*s Indust to continue as in the City, available as i from extensive office buildin URBAN EDUCATIOl The Orono Scho Highway 12 and land necessary The area is ce transportation contiguous pie should that ev urban recre ^ Urban p^s, Plan bemuse t or miifi-parks residential la uroan area are significant nu RURAL LAND USE RURAL RESIDENTTi Rural residen with a minimu total number total rural a one unit per of wetlands a which in turn this region i The planned r dwelling 'will systems. The the natural w the preservat population de system. , ■< er ration - into 20 single ive-acre minmum) imum) the applicant's density of 3.4 acres es generally base of the slopes ommon property acent to the e Comprehensive 4 ■ixJ %: JUNE, 1980 URBAN industrial LAND USE to°contiiHf'*n^t^e oni*^ Highway. 12 west of Long.Lake is planned In r?r as the only appropriate ‘area for industrial-type activitv from extensive residential d»voio «. sewer. The area is remote URBAN EDUCATIONAL LAND USE The Orono School District Campus* on Old Crvei-ai i. Highway 12 and Sixth Avenue Ndith is tolanned^^i Bay Road between land necessary or Aooronri to continue as the only The area is educational facilitiL. transportation, water aiTd sewer Sufficient^! served by adequate contiguous piece for^^ll necessarv faflll^”^ i® available in one should that ever be Required ^ ilities and for any future expansion URBAN RECREATTONAL FACILITIES A 'i. or mun3p.|.)(g which are inmediar.^^ *** relatively small neighborhood resiSential land %k ^ ^ accessory to the overlaying urban «r?^ ««a« ^«iuties identiiud ii; the significant number of urban residents^ * points which attract a RURAL LAND USE RURAL RESIDENTIAL LAND USE with a miiimCm^diy-buiidSble^lot^iire of^^t*? family dwellings, total number of forecast cuLiL k two acres, when the total rural acrea^ o? ^00^(8060 ? ‘^•'e one unit per seven acres. This is *<r*re*flectlo^'°**.K**'*^ density becomes of wetlands and public open soace that^^ ®*tensive amounts which in turn is a orim!r! ^ occupies our rural service area, this region is impractical anrune«J[omic!"*^°" of urban services into d!i:iu*g Wirptrmf:::^"" l..st 2.0 dry.buildable net acres per systems. The plaiwpd rural"de^^"wlll* supply and sewage treatment the natural weilaJfS a^S “io«^Sr »-Jversely «fect the preservation of Lake filtration system so necessary to population de^rittes wJ^ ''®‘®' »he resultingsystem. require no major changes to the public road CMP. 4-27 r- •A ■ ' **“% •«v 7T^ mm % }< h ^ LAND USE The plann the histo large eno uses. Be planned r economica This pres land, as Orono res Certain r because o Minnetonk character public se improveme water sew will be s addition Orono's r dwelling environme services. the estab unit woul maintain RURAL This to be Area. two a housi may i allow to th RURAL Altho for t is pi in th quasi min im conce. JUNE, 1980 ^4 * s planned activity ies are a is remote such as hreen the only eicilities. by adequate Le in one ture expansion Land Use neighborhood n.g urban iifie^d in the attract a y dwellings. When the nto the sity becomes ive amounts vice area, ices into cres per vage treatment csely «#fect essary to ill ting Lie road LAND USE JUNE, 1980 The planned rural density should maintain to the greatest extent possible the historic character of this rural area with land remaining in parcels^ large enough to permit quasi-agricultural activities as well as residential uses. Because extensive, expensive urban services are not necessary, the planned rural density will allow rural development of two-acre lots to be economically competitive with urban development in other suburban areas. This preserves the rural land owner's rights to use and/or develop his land, as well as preserving the widest choice of lifestyle possible for Orono residents. Certain restrictions on rural residential development will be imposed because of the existence of numerous wetlands and drainageways to Lake Minnetonka, steep slopes, soil type variations and. other natural characteristics. These restrictions will minimize the need for expensive public services such as municipal sanitary sewer, municipal water, major improvements in public transportation, and most important, public storm water sewer and treatment facilities. All rural lands abutting lakeshore will be subject to the same protective restrictions as urban lands in addition to the lower land use; density of the area'. Orono*s rural residential density will not be increased to less than one dwelling per two dry-buildable acres because of the potentially adverse environmental impact and because of the increased need for costly urban services. Orono's rural residential density will not be decreased below the established average because the resulting increase in acreage per unit would destroy the ability of the rural residents to economically maintain their property. RURAL RESIDENTIAL - 1 DWELLING PER TWO ACRES This is the typical rural residential density developed and planned to be permanently self-supporting in all of Orono's Rural Service Area. No rural density will be allowed greater than one unit per two acres except for those existing residences in existing rural housing clusters as identified in the CSPP. New rural developments may include housing clustering when environmental and site conditions allow, provided the overall density within the development conforms to these requirements. RURAL RESIDENTIAL - 1 DWELLING PER FIVE ACRES Although the typica?. two acre rural residential density is appropriate for the entire Rural Service Area, the northwest corner of the City is planned for a lower density of one unit per five acres. The citizens in this area have a traditional desire for more intensive rural and quasi-agricultural activities which require and support the larger minimum lot density. Thus, historic land use and not environmental concerns have determined this land use classification. CMP 4-28 m ' ■ mi- ^ASv PAINTER ’S CREEK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 100 N. LaSalle Street Suite 2211 Chicago, Illinois 60602 312-263-4523 November 21, 1983 Members of the Orono Planning Commission Orono, MN Ladies and Gentlemen: Our company is presenting tonight a sketch plan for the proposed Painter's Creek subdivision of the 73 acre tract of land lying within The Luce Line Trail, McCulley Road, C.S.A.H. No 84 and the adjacent nature conservancy as a planned residential unit development. An outline addressing the identification of the principals involved in the project, its general site statistics and our proposals accompanies this letter. Our intention is to develop this land at its highest and best use as executive-quality residential homesites giving each homeowner a part of the unique ridgeline view and country living experience inherent in the land while preserving that same natural setting and individual privacy through careful site selections and enhancements, use reservations, architectural control, public dedications and existing public uses. Our local representatives, Ron Bastyr of R. Bastyr and Associates, Inc. and Jeff Martineau of Eberhardt/Fox-Herfurth Real Estate, are present to explain the project and to fully and satisfactorily answer your questions. We view tonight's meeting as the first step in making the reciprocal committment with Orono necessary to insure the success of a project of which all concerned can be proud. Inter's Creek Development Corporation ,o_C-----.OvJvCi John B. Burrel 1, President \ oposed within ent nature ine project, letter. est use r a part rent in the privacy ons, ses. Our Inc. and tnt to ‘ questions. reciprocal iject of Painter's Creek, Orono, Minnesota Proposed Sinqls Family Development Owner-and Developer Painters Creek Development Corporation John Burrell Bruce Lange Site Statistics Existing - Total area - Wetlands area - Existing Use 72.6 acres 6.0 acres open Proposed - Total Lots 20 - Average Lot Size w/common area 3.4 Acre w/o common area 2.0 Acre - Minimum Lot Width 200 feet - Zoning - w Acre Single Family m •S m A Mi \f i mm it:: : I , * -i Q Desic - [ - ^ c - L V - L b - 2 s - A 1 - A a - S - Ai Pl Dr I I Design Phase Considerations - Designed to achieve exclusive executive home sites Natural character to be preserved by careful placement of homesites and streets. Lots to be designed recognizing site trees, topography views and vistas. Lots chosen and designed in field to preserve a privacy between homes - Topography, trees, etc. 20 homesites reasonable by field design. Average Lot size w/common area 3.4 acres. Although 2 acres zoning is required, lots are substantially larger in average. Attention to detail will allow preservation of the site aesthetics and natural character. - Site will be enhanced as well to provide additional amenities. - Substantial berming - Additional planting & moving of on-site trees - rock walls to accent land features - entrance enhancements - additional ponding area and character - encourage careful house placement - Architectural limitation will restrict house character and design - size - color - style - textures - Public blacktop streets will enhance desirability - Drainfields have been designed and tested mimK Mimii• . . .... .. nf.r- Development Proposal - fits surrounding uses - special use for special site - proposal strives to preserve and enhance - will allow for much needed exclusive single family homesites I 11 i \ m .-I: -- .m • fL A-, 103 j.’- Jo ^OifJU Q JUOOJL I pJuJbtjLO VuOA pUbrY^4iAJLdi Q> Fv:.;. I j .- V'-- j_jbocbi*^ ■ - -j;a dL» V\djj^ .1 * • p i U>Oi jurtuLcK UJt: •ius - Jci'iL) -..N :• * .V*^ f. UL^ciiiJoejljb fe/vtOU5VV (XO f./- i• 7.>. tt/vca?v ftctij vBSt^>' V;;^; iU < •:* •• 1* ir'y-Ta :rAT,-;i^ ii- «^^*■ S'i '^m ?:;kT ^:r •• .r.W. <1 Mb ■'k I tes i -■I fej -t r * r • ' ^ - ' /■• T . • ikL PJU>k/vuAila (jprt^AvU^iAurv>- •. Sjlu OJl ^ JULA^aJJ^i, fcb oJA xmA. -tl-t- '■ '..-v' * l^tCo VuuuuJvu^ oO Kf&otAvOxJ^ pitjev)4i;4jLdl GXAJJjcV*'-V!r?M*^ - ^ ------- fN-i_. (2oo^: H cuxawv . bruA^ fcb y^iuh. (XttiAdiuvJ. ju Maxc K UJCiuA-d CiilJe V i* CiXAUvdc OdClbQjQj jcVui^ (f>xj&^pjLxbL^ Yvuua>kz> :KSku i^aixxtDf^d \o <^Ayxjp Ic^d < ;-: op(W. '■ ro&>" en^ OXJOO VXJBYVUU ^ (3x>ouk \wi4 :S ii^m^:m Wh ■m-M 'wcr • ■1 im^ « r .vi u 4 •! • • . * • .>•*' ‘ *. . *'* . ■ ** %f jii iO •* . • » ‘ •*• • *'• .■ - •••. •*•■ * • ■'^:v-=-'r r'-: ■*A.'° 'Sm <3; >3 -pui^i Gc Vj^^^JUvuum -/^ AK- pvJUJLh. jYirux.cKa/1 p kx> jtAvccL - ji*-phjtswAib C DCQJUW-ffVjQJ &»ma)LL ojv tb (ijUL. iA- TVUXwiclouJvv- b>{jULJL>UAO ^ WottJ f^imjLdU pH^posoJLo ■''••■fev,- U?^i;-V-.i-tr- -»^-* • : *"• I \-A . ; •*» ♦ -- < r#- ■ [A;:.' rr J •mmemSmS E'v'.v ■* * Ifi. ’r :r K. JxLJ ^ JUuu Jb. jUU^-vuwlK GO^KiXJ'KKMuc^ CUU lJu Avc QhJLiftjuvA>€.dL wcrtxiJuliL 0^^1-k*' 'TfLULcK OLo 'QX^ftxuJb^ vA ilo Ci) C^ndj/w 0_ WxJj<Ao ^c Iax . tudLcUlx^ jbKodu Jluirt, "tkvjuoLJ . Tt*Jbai-> ujoocio stxUL r- oivjrwAL CiVjJtiM- 4 o>vJ ^ tJ^OAAJL-^rvAi ^ UHU. Qa > TLWvwiJU^ " a^vvoJJu OAu^aJU 0,/vui Vvfld*, Jbb QjUl Jii, rLetoMjL^ , o/vud bj n^vowvCXajJv^ Ou 'YudxuuaJL pJuAra.^ btsJoujiA. ^^{Jjjxxao ■fcV'-*-' ' ]^.aUJLdLo CU) UtfiUJ CWLCW30- i^K^^doJbO. »#• 4' * • l» ’ » -s.* i* - ;■.• ‘ • •. ^ t' a: C4:^> c »■;■ .• < j>' • * .r. . •• . ■ ... - • . . -... il«|fi\S@lM h % - ■■• -... f m^m preliminary plat freshwater foundation «SSw«^ Sir. “ **• W«*> «*t4» IW ite. 0m m ^ fm* mm H m m m^ m, 0mtt m4 0m t am » U» »t mai lami Umaam amtm *• lw« *( Ito Uma ufnaa I,/fit h, •.iMsfi r>- »q.i.%KIKWtt»!:.INC *■ ................................... /i tc^Lt m PUT rne »*SIS THt Became ststi* ,$ a«$uMco ijcitores "iaatna coua'T MonjMfaT ♦ foata »on •• '.A’t MlmI i-KTran •O’ll ••^ja 0 C(*M«iKt»far o» coasTauCTi^ TX saivraa. seata i ?is M ,-coaafa >«a».L Bf iat5Tat.i.f a basratMi >ao« preliminary utilitiag for: freshwater foundation .;^A^ SHAOrWCOO ROAD BOX 90 MVARRE, MN 55392 'TRl. \R kom lit |<^ eaaiaa a» ^vfat><i( a • ia». ^ a.a.a. aa , a«.*, a» «a; ^"5 uh ! !. ni??!! 'll:} ij 11 Biil II i lU iiliPliii MI !li- ui!I!! !iiKliiilP IHi litr[is f 1 illp iilll i’’pjl Jjll* 'i’u’m i p IM- ? J s uf I, 338., '■'■n g I ‘ If* I '§M 0<"' rtO If i!!l!l|5|fn' H|-*^ 4.. 4*^ m.