Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-15-1983 Planning Packet1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:30 PM MONDAY, AUGUST 15, 1983 Council Representative ~ Thomas Frahm Call To Order Public Hearinqs 1.7:30 PM #768 Sidney Rebers/William Wear, 2060 & 2160 Wayzata Rezoning 2.7:45 PM #767 Sidney Rebers, 2060 Wayzata Blvd Preliminary Subdivision 3.8:00 PM #766 McDonald's Corp., 2060 Wayzata Conditional Use Permit & Commercial Blvd Site Plan Review 4.8:15 PM #769 Lake Minnetonka's Homes, Inc., Preliminary Subdivision 155 Willow Drive ; Action 5.#695 Guenther Roth, 1428 Baldur Park Road Variance 6.#760 William Ulrich, 1535 Bohns Point Road Conditional Use Permit 7.#764 Calvary Memorial Church, 2420 Dunwoody Avenue Variance & Conditional Use Permit 8.#765 Rudolph Hoch, 875 Partenwood Road Variance 9.#770 Ron Gehring, 1396 Baldur Park Road Variance 10.#771 Larry Grabill, 1350 Rest Point Lane Variance • • 11.#772 Robert Luesse, 3249 Casco Circle Variance 12.#773 Richard Zuckman, 3995 North Shore Drive Conditional Use Permit 13.#774 John Allenburg, 865 Partenwood Road Variance 14.Select Planning Commission Representative to meeting of September 19, 1983. attend Council • Approval of Minutes 15.Approval of Planning Commission minutes of July 18,1983. Information Item 16. Joint Council & Planning Commission Meeting - September 10, 1983 t:- % 'msr-V=.: >SION AGENDA 2RS 7:30 PM 5T 15, 1983 ihm Lliam Wear, 2060 & 2160 Wayzata Blvd 160 Wayzata Blvd >n 2060 Wayzata Blvd : & Conunercial Site Plan Review 5 Homes, Inc., 155 Willow Drive South )n ' Park Road i Point Road 1420 Dunwoody Avenue t Permit od Road ark Road oint Lane Circle h SXjore Drive wood Road esentative to attend Council M ■i V ■'ifl e;V-v \ LLA€E of oeono 1 -................1 ■■■ ■?C7 :••—■—I- { ...4 • • • • • '« • • I — —•• :tis\ < • - I -.••Hr--. o __1 ^ •» .o* N u-;w: 1^1 N - - m iS- •Vr' » , r# ✓ ^ • * > ▼— • • • •’ t MM •..' mm :X> ■■ : ..<V| feS’iWS ii*i >■ r. ••■•■•'•: r ■ X I minutes of July 18, 1983. Sion Meeting - September 10, 1983 :i ■ A mm dzJfOit FROM; DATE; SUBJECT: #768 #767 #76# . V vru V-”- '•• .t =r11-^•k^r'^.-n-' Planning Commission .„..^..^orJeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Alan F. Olson, City Planner August 10, 1983 August 15, 1983 Public Hearing Schedule Rezoning scheduled for 7:30 P.M. subdivision scheduled for 7:45 P-M. Conditional Use Permit scheduled for 8.00 P.M. These three subjects |°|g®they are^related°to*'the saTO property, ?S^^^ublirSear?rsTh;u?rbl co^^ined into one presentation. The hearings are listed separately on the agenda because that is how they were advertised. I would appreciate the “®^“^j,^°'^^®®ipening^thrhe«i^ 8!oO^?!m!*' A^^th^iim^. all ihree hearings can be opened together and the presentation begun other business can then be handled between 7:30 P.M. 6 8:00 P.M. to?* I 4 TO; FROM: DATE: SUBJEI OVERV These desir come is pa subdi build for t The r McDor the F conve the X these deve] The 2 on t) will as %fc needc we n< elim: in t1 OUTL Then appl for i 1. .e e separate e seune property, entation. ause that is how announcing each tearing until >pened together . & 8:00 P.M. TO:waiter R. Benson, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Planning Commission FROM:Alan P. Olson, City Planner DATE: August 2, 1983 SUBJECT:#766 Conditional Use Permit 6 Petition for Se%«r/Water McDonald's Corporation #767 Subdivision - Rebers #768 Rezoning - Rebers 6 Wear OVERVIEW subdivision is therefore necessary to building site in addition to the basic conditional use review for the restaurant itself. The rezoning application does not directly affect the proposed McDonald's site. Rezoning and creation of the the Rebers subdivision are housekeeping matters included for convenience and designed to facilitate future deve^^^^ the remaining Rebers property. .’^•'tf POints out the effect these applications have in opening the entire parcel for development in the forseable future. The applicants understandably desire an expedited "view concentrating Monrknald*s site. However, decisions made for this site SiU ha^ perifnint implications for the Rebers pro^rty as well as for other adjacent properties. Services and needed here must accommodate these other areas as we11^ j a-rt skvercise extra foresight and care in tnis review to ^liSinftrconflicts or problems that would otherwise surely follow in the very near future. OUTLINE OF ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS There are six basic issues which need to be reviewed for these applications. These have been divided into separate reports for clarity, with my recommendations suimiarized as follows: 1.BASIC LAND USE. The property has been zoned B-1 commercial since at least 1967. The proposed subdivision and the ?eqS?r “^n?rinlTitrthr!arSsrtectIo^^ plan. The issue is not appropriateness of location or use. The issues are availability of sewer and water, and adequacy of drainage and access improvements. Addressing these later points will likely result in redesign of the proposed lot and site plan. 7] tt'J h'S #766-767-7 Page 2 2. SUBDIl agree: propoj rememl and i! This 1 f lexil some : be pri that that • resta 3. REZON real! with lot 1 was p shoul appro appro exact 4. DRAIN plans DOT a some requi lot a storn 5. ACCES accep accon truck must propc this to pi servj chanr eastk Me Dor comp] subdj 6. UTIL] IS n( (Weai has 1 be n< unti: done consi a pel shou! Mer/Water - »nald' 8 ^rthwest i site , A led review proposed 3ts in sd for Bnt of Eect concentrating is site rs property improvements Therefore view to irely follow lor these reports LIows: rcial i the Dning comp rehen sive on or use. nd adequacy these e proposed #766-767-768 Review Page 2 2. 3. 4. 5. SnSlSS III remembered that this vision^reviewand is fully subject to the City's subdivision review. This means that the lot size and flexible and can be changed if our review uncovers some reason to require it. The subdivision should not be preliminarily approved until the City that there is sufficient room for drainage facilities, that access concerns have been addressed and that tne restaurant site plan is acceptable. REZONIHG. This is a housekeeping change intended to realign the residential/coromercial district boundary with Wear's existing property line and with logical lot lines on Rebers property. This exact was paeliminarily approved by the Council in 1978 and should be conceptually reappproved subject to final approval occuring at the same time as final subdivision approval so that the zoning line will thereafter conform exactly to final lot line locations. DRAINAGE. The developer must submit detailed drainage plans for review and approval of the City, Minnesota DOT and MCWD. This will likely entail construction of some kind of retention pond which will inturn likely require alteration of the proposed site plan and corner lot size. The additional inflow may also require a public storm sewer project. ACCESS. Commercial access onto Brown Road is not acceptable without major roadway improvements to safely accommodate the traffic, turning movements and delivery truck axle loads. Direct access onto Wayzata Boulevard nmst be limited in nundber and location, meaning the proposed access must be redesigned to serve more than this one use. And serious consideration must be given to providing, or at least planning for, a commercial S0rvice road to serve all the B—1 zone because forseeable channelization of Wayzata Boulevard would otherwise eliminate eastbound access to or from these properties, including McDonald's and the existing Orono Shopping Center. Final comprehensive access plans must be an integral part of the subdivision review at this time. 6.UTILITIES. Despite the long-standing 3-1 zoning, there is no sewer or water service to any of the Reber property (Wear has service direct from the City of ^ng Lake but has never been assessed for it by either City). There can be no additional commercial development on any of this property until sewer and water is available, and that can only be done by agreement between Long Lake and Orono, and by construction of new laterals by Orono. We have received a petition for service. An engineering feasibility study should be ordered. #766-767 Page 3 OUTLINE These ap City Dep and the A public review i gather ii Detailei all acc4 After tl theae a] enginee; road an< applica since t) improve Further Council staff h technic * I m BT bile y y d ble iminate 19 jial ! the ire srty It i can I property be ved tudy ■V.- . • -A*:— ■■M #766-767-768 Page 3 fttWT.TME OP HEtfTlM PROCBDORES ?^trD2St~nfs:.s:T%srSi “"UinS2r^ and the City of Long Lake. A public hearing In' inf option- ss‘ss.rsis:^.s^w ».=<—u«»- ^ a.u the Citv Council should conceptually reviewAfter the hearing, the city cow consider ordering thoee *P?^^®;^^“?h,??tv^tSdiee^for the utilities and for possible ?Md”and »ccess‘improvement^ The Coun^l^|0"l^j“^^^3tuLes :?Sce°thiVv4SirL*tL“^ directly benefittin, by such ijuproveinents • Further review of these :i^Se2?s"SSS"ritr "s?S?f'ha5rrrsS?:id'^rpre;arS options for resolving the technical quesions raised herein. ■A' mm. mm ........mum - : :mKm r ■ ['U; f mimt CONSTRUCTI The Hone City Coi City of Box 66 Crystal Dear Naj I hereii partial U.S. Hi< for a Cc restaurs 1.33 aci Since EX but have At this sorting 1 of Hr. » the Citi A privai planned proposee McDonalc existinc We wish to answe IHIIIJUI icuk'ULCCKCn<tti~r>^.tf=M.4B>c<kmi:2?^M«^aiiE9a<Dbat2~^:a 'V-onu '.V 5ttfii^ Bernhard RAers, Master Builder REtCllt CONSTRUCTION COMPANY • SS2S WEOSTER AVt • ST. LOUIS PARK. MINNESOTA SS41I • TELEPHONE l2S-SStS July 15, 1983 JULI5609 CITY OF ORONO lyiThe Honorable Mayor Mary Butler and City Council City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 I Dear Mayor Butler and Counci lineiidl>ers: •« I herein submit my application to the City of Orono for a sub>division and partial re'^zoning of my property in the Northwest comer of Brown Road and U.S. Highway 12. My application is being made concurrently with a request for a Conditional Use Permit by McDonald's Corporation to build a new restaurant. McDonald's has entered into an agreement with me to purchase 1.33 acres of my property at the comer of Brown Road and Highway 12. Since purchasing the property in 1971, I have considered its development but have not made final plans because of uncertainty in the market place. At this time, I am merely platting the 4 parcels in order to resolve the zoning between the RR—IB zone and the B*1 zone to align with the North line of Mr. William Wear's parcel and to provide a platted lot as required for the City's consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for McDonald's. A private driveway easement for ingress and egress from Highway 12 is planned to serve the McDonald's site approximately 130' West 6f their proposed West line (400' West of Brown Road). The purpose in serving the McDonald's site at this point is to clearly separate this traffic from the existing Brown Road/Highway 12 traffic. We wish to thank you for your consideration of this proposal and look forward to answering any questions you may have at the August 15, 1983, meeting. Very tmly yours. #767 Sidney B. Rebers ___________________ Betrbara L. Rebers ft-- • * ••••- I • TCIEPMONE tll-mi Lsion and Road and I roquaat new purdiase 12. Lopnent b place. Ive the North line Lred for •s. 2 la heir ving the from the look foEward eeting. ^r) i % ■y^ ¥ ij ‘►'I '1- inHK & •• * .0 • * I !;’« t ^ I _/ys -.jW 23 , 24 7T^ ■ni 00 D aai >1^ n (•) • { *lt •VPiJ.X'.-r £2SSS3B ifi JMJX 1% ^0^#707 ron TU^ //8 1«|M ■“H6LV0 —*• # /-•-5TV#| ;2U 1 -^--3 I iri> P !••&• (!'■ I IMO :i • f • n ^ 5 a ^ i«t« :« SCiE \ . *01 ^ Kfiarcn I I 3T^ • •iHsir •'W 1 ‘•M lii It r W m .^mmm L-CITY OF ORONO July 22 Dear ^ Encloi propel will I traff publi of Lo Since Enel vl'..«W*UM z^\y • • > 9 r SF» ^ 1 K i♦ 'V 1] ^4.. > >i r.f sili Telephone 473*7357 L A CITY of ORONO H^om- B.. «*c«-.« B.r. CITY OF ORONO On the Sorth Share of Lake Minrittonka July 22, 1983 Mavor Arthur Kunze n w Kunze Company 23 27 west 5^356Long Lake, Minnesota Dear Mayor Kunze: , . #or the- Sid Bebers' Enclosed for y°"^^"^°S^nald“te8taurant • <nq^tealn^, property and P^°P items of mutual ^ ivina vou of scheduled Sill be St“r! we wiU ^ l!*^^oSiw Sith the Citytraffic, sewer and waterclosely witn public ‘‘«*?^'*?/thS review of this proposal, of Long Lake m the Sincerely, Alan P« Olson City Planner Enclosures CITY OF ORONO July 20, Mr. Eva Minne so 2055 No Golden The ati applies commen' hearin If you contac Sincer je anne Zonin< cc: Enclo 1 wm Telepl»o«« 473-7357 iRONO 0 • Munictpal OfRc« [lebers* f of Orono drainage, of scheduled the City > tr. ^41 V^A :V' .y- >.■ 3r 4 :^v' •< j'j 1 W nn« m mi Ml m A ■•■•■•'■ St ■ : ■ •=“ ".. tel;: Telephone 473-7357 L.CITY OF ORONO Fos CITY of ORONO . om- B« «.C-.. B.». Mi.«».U 55323. Munidp- 0««. On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka July 20, 1983 Hr. Evan Green - Transportation Goidervalley. Minnesota 55422 ,767 - Sidney Rebers - 2060 Wayzata Boulevard Dear Mr. Green: The attached P^*"? .®^®Kits ^*'please*hav?au''yout reviewing application fo= Sid Rebers. Please na^ ^ p„blxc Sirinrfofthftuwl^isio" i® 'hearing lot —r . ^I„^!ct*‘nth«^TirXn Torallne"^ Sincerely, Jeanne A. Mabusth Zoning Administrator cc: File 1767 Enclosures • July 26 Cliffor Minneha P.O. Be Wayzata d Dear M The pr for yo in req order additi In ad( specii Schoe! contr< requi Augus Commi Since Encl< cc: ■tiLDlh AS -- ' ITT! phone 473-7357 ONO wkipnl OfficM Sion ifing kiblic 1983. L CITY OF CITY of ORONO |N»t Offic »» 66.C.yrt.l B.y. 66323.M.«W,.I Ofll-. ORONO On the North Shore of Lahe Minnetonka July 26 f 1983 Sinnehah/creek Watershed District w;?iata^w ’ 55391 Re: ^^!?SSPMin;ri^^Ch«c^^ variance t Conditional use O0&^ Mr • Reep • « The preliminary plans iny^coS^ntryo^My have f« ?our review. for the subject property. In!“ regard to the drain.|e^concerns^^^^ ^ of the additional information you will need for your review. in addition, I enclosed JI^rt“from specifically, for 29^^1983, dealing with draxnage |ll;rroi.‘ ntrs2'lf"m? Jf a^uio^^^^ C^issiin meeting of August 15th. Sincerely "'V'SlfcvJL Jeanne A. Ct' jednne a. Mabusth Zoning Administrator Enclosures cc:File 1766 File #767 File 1764 StlLDINC A ZONING - 47J-7 JS7 assessing administration a finance - 47J-7 J58 PUSLICWORKS-471-7 JSf ;'.C CITY OF ORONO July 26, Glenn Co Bonestro 2335 Hig St. Paul Dear Gle I have c Rhode's and cal] also li) I will 1 Planninc Also en< subdivij McDonali the sub< possible water t< and coni retenti Please your re 1983, a concern 1983. Sincere Jeanne Zoning lUILDlNG A zo assessinc ORONO &S323*M«nicip«l OfficM Lonal Use enclosed nay have erty. Xn ! ne of the I but» >rt from I inage is nse by Planning fliiUe%foaas>4mil« CITY OF ORONO CITY of ORONO H<m( OfTice Bos 66* Crystal Bay. Minnesota S5323* Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka July 26, 1983 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderkik & Assoc. 2335 Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 #751 Jack Rhode - Variance Dear Glenn: I have enclosed the long awaited ^*'®^*^^?^^??c?\**'*piease*review si, iS. ””o5s M.; wltl, you b.tor. yo. »«• ~<t«' I will need that report by August 8th for presentation to t e Planning Commission on August 15, 1983. Also enclosed are the very preliminary plans ^he Reber's subdivision and the conditional use permit application of ^“nail-t for the commercial lot «t the east corner. As for the subdivision we will be looking at Mcess inwuaing possible changes to Brown Road and ways of Water to entire commercial property; and for both and conditional use permit, the need to address drainag retention pond, etc. Please let me know the kind of information y»“ ASa^t*15. yiSr recommendations. A public ^tponsl ”nc4rSinrthe type If information you will require by August 8, 1983. Sincerely, Jeanne A. Mabusth Zoning Administrator Enclosures cc; File #767 File #766 File #751 BUILDING a ZONING - 473-73S7 ASSESSING administration a finance - 473-735S PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7 3S9 T •fr i •.V i. > --i Mid4- ^ f' Alan P. C DEVELOPMi ISSUE #1 EXISTING The Rebe (excludi and cont wetlands small po The sout since at family r None of any muni EXISTING The Rebc consists dwellinc located The exit 1. 2. However is not i still bi The exi The sys The othi The exi of f and has bee to be c address the dt ORONO 56323* MttnidpRl Officw r Jack lae review I would report. to the eber* s of As for ncluding e%fer and iivision ge - ted to make ^or August IS, tsponse f August 8, rustic WORKS %fytU9 Alan P. Olson, City Planner DEVELOPMENT REVIEW July 29, 1983 #766-767-768 ISSUE #1: BASIC LAND USE & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW EXISTING PROPERTY ^ ^ ^ ._1 ^ narcel of about 41 acres net size The Reber property is “'J® -he land is heavily wooded wetlands but the topographical survey does reveal at le small potholes. The south 375 ft (more or less) has been since at least 1967. The remaining area is zoned RR IB single family rural residential, unsewered, 2 acres per unit. None of the property has ever been served with or assessed for any municipal sewer or water. EXISTING USE - 2060 WAY2ATA BOULEVARD The Reber property currently is occupied by an old farmstead cSnsisting'^of a rLtal house, a barn with an attached second rental dwelling 2nd several out-buildings. All structures would be located on Lot 3 of the proposed subdivision. The existing use is non-conforming on two counts; 1. Residential use in the B-1 district, and 2. Two separate dwellings on one property. However this situation is longstanding and the character of it is not changed by this subdivision. Also the actual density wou still be over 2k acres per unit. The existing dwellings utiliize treatment sy^ The system for the main house had new drainfield added in 1977. The other system has not yet been locatea bv the City. The existing driveway directly to Wayzata Boulevard has been closed o« 2^d unllled for some time. Only one Wayzata Boulevard address has been assigned to the property. Addressing “®®®“* "®*!* . to be clarified for 911 response. Each dwelling needs a separate address, and the address should be on North Brown as long as the .driveway- enters from that side. X- #766-767-768 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISSUE #1: BASIC LAND USE S CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW Page The property i®.|°|a®"®exist? *This"is’a zoning violation ^"ich“shouw“Se“l«tcted by removal of the vehicles. ^^MnTTTOMAI. US^ - «766 - MCDONALDS The proposed McDonald^s resta^ant is a class H a conditional use permit in tne o The proposal compares to B-1 district performance standards as followsf Section B-1 Required Proposed Lot Area Lot Width Buildi Setbacks Front Side Rear 35.041 35.042 35.046 20,000 sf 100 ft 57,930 sf 225 ft 35 ft 15 ft 35 ft Yard Requirements (Open space without structures) Front Internal Side Street Side Rear Sign Size Sign Height 35.043 35.044 35.044 35.044 38.031 38.034 (2 ft^above 17 ft roof height) Sign Setback Parking Required Restaurant Drive-in Parking Setback Front 20 0 10 30 50 19 ft ft ft ft sf ft 316 312 202 10 ft 3,470 sf/100 1/80 sf 1/15 sf 20 ft Internal Side Street Side Rear Screening Hardcover 35.047 none 3 ft 10 ft 3 ft none DEVELOP ISSUE i All sp< perhapi condit: with d< broade: of ade< separa RECOMM Additi before 768 Page 2 It two It ion nt requiring 35.024. ds as Proposed S7,930 sf 225 ft 76 ft 5 ft/121 ft 75 ft 27 ft+ 10 ft 15 ft+ 31 ft Unknoim Unknown 10 ft s/97 spaces 44 232 20 ft to space 0 ft to drive 10 ft 15 ft 17 ft natural trees 83%t DEVELOPMENT REVIEW RECOMMENDATION ■. 1- ‘ V, V #766-767-768 ISSUE #1: BASIC LAND USE & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW Page 3 All specification standards appear to be met by this design except oerha^ thriack of setback to the front internal driveway. The conditional use permit review therefore need not be concerned with detail specifications but instead should concentrate on the broader issues of traffic safety, drainage and the availability ©radequate public utilities as discussed in the accompanying separate reports. Additional designing and juggling of elements appears to be necessary before a final site plan can be considered, as follows: Drainage calculations and retention pond designs are required. The necessary pond will likely move all improvements north and/or west resulting in a larger lot as well as a redesigned site plan. Final grading plans for the whole site are required. It appears as if a large amount of earth must be moved to level the site for the improvements as proposed, including much change outside the proposed lot lines. This must be coordinated with access road designs and future useability of the surrounding lot. Also needed are plans for replanting and erosion control on all disturbed areas. Access driveways need to be revised to be coordinated with a service road (probably to the north) rather than direct access to Brown Road, and with a revised multi-use access to the west onto Wayzata Boulevard. Also, the front internal driveway should be redesigned to provide some setback from the property line and/or to become part of the service road system. The lot and all improvements need to be setback at least 10 ft farther north for additional right of way dedication to accommodate future highway channalization and the necessary City sewer and water laterals. Finally, any conditional use approval must be consistent with CMP Urban Land Use Policy #7; ie? sewer and water must be available before the development can be built. sm. I- ^ r-' \ -v.v m • V 7i! 4 •• ;"! ■ V ■■ ■ ■■ ■, ' The : the Augu Cort pern proi and All Wri re'y Ci^ BY #766-767-768 [EW Page 3 esign except eway. The ncerned ate on the liability ipanying to be necessary i: Lgns f move in a squired. b be as proposed cess rrounding nd erosion ordinated rather revised ulevard. redesigned .ne and/or >ack at |ht of way innalization als. ye consistent r and water [1 be built. r'wl i .1 i I tV * ■ i' AJ-f . ■ tif tJti-yi'A Piv!'.- f : 'w;:; .‘.i. ;: ;p P;vP-livXlP: ,» ■■■ ■ -.i..: .-■^■■v.l V. ' t' i. '*■ '*p ■' t:!' i.i' i€ A* t.-' ■6-»V mmm .=^P=^;Pv;A,•:PVp.s4■ • * ' ^ .' CITY OF OROHO notice * Planning Commi8»i°" will south“B?^^R°f the McSwaid ’s :.nis ti^.propotty located at 2 tv\is tiro® • La reeonxng afaUa^e for ’'iUrin the City offices. City of Otono . Planning CownissionBY; Jean tl \ r r'. ■ I AND USE UPHAN COMMERCl Urban commerci with all the n center of Oron This area will service busxne of most Orono occupied livir appropriate ir Xn additional to similar lai available froi complimentary t.aveshoRE COH Lake access a lakeside comm standards ar* and protectic The primary ] necessary to boat service areas are no salesp which functions su be appropria One lakeshor Maxwell Bay sewer is ava facilities i lack of pub] crowded bay• appropriate A I Additional ] north of Tai environment! Plan for coi are not ava commercial in the CSPP V .. V,, in onday # cDonald s al use kW. on a ibdivision is time* ble for i^Tta5isr5-«»tor t- V.V JUNE, 1980 ■ <^»in USE Z.n con.n.erci.1 development •“ jrj£cj»»erci.l This area will p -i„- adequate pro^ssional of offices and owner- lYlill Or:irr::i4.nt.. ^^^Ur^iirratriy re^elop-ent. -ill be coneioered appropriate In .or near the »ava..-jgjg- - - --- -12 adjacent ^^aa tional limited commercial I^a is ^®“®"*This area has utilities ro :t«il« “*"\r ”cit"y rifprcide neighborhood services -tit:^:t^:;"tytb^tra;iiiahie in th,^- - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- T.vnsMORE LAMP OSELAKESHORE cqw—- - - - - -- — for a a lake user service businesses are app _ performance Lake access 1 ^ require a lakeshore ,-kg environment lakeside to assure protection of the lake rnrpt:t:ctron":rteiq"hborinq properties. 7e Trlry purpose is to Permit th^^ rott'tttvic: ;rat%epairs and fishinq supplies. iTllYrlUZl^ " tt:\at;shore commercial areas. one lakeabore commercial^are. htstttic.lly Maxwell Bay wbe*® ^ sanitation -i neighborhoods, lack of public one contiguous area is considered trpCrittffortrdiratiort^o this use. Xdditional lakeshore c»"»*”^“\*rs'«tt”at%tt«\ttrs^ttrtton ’'a^^ north of Tanager Lake ^gn gay, but it is not ^**‘^«"*‘®^gr"icgs environmental P”®J®“® "“rtunicipal sewer and other “'K*" *®'’i°” Plan for p®""®!'®^®^ ttis trea would be considered *"‘““g^gg*projected t'otmrrtitrdtfijnatitt should sanitary sewer become available in the CSPP Facilities Plan. CMP 4-26 ;.*.,k. » . ; ri. i i Vr.- ;b,- Y fr^r. < :■ ■< : s r-. ••• ■'S’ LAND US£ 6.COMMERC: ADVERSE] The loc. develop] upon th Whereve will be PUBLIC INDUSTF Commerc uses wi sewer« protect commerc develoj water i and fi: 8.URBAN 1 FACILI' allowe the ur limita sewer, facili to ove exist! permit or reg 9.THE E) Commur The ui rural be exi or ali 10. THE d: ASSUR PROPE amoun maxim assur resid > #1980 roviOed commercial arre. retail and ► the needs \d owner- be considered X2 adjacent utilities tiood services lor a performance ronment ectly launching > ommercial ng boat sory ities will Lan along ted. Sanitary of the existing ghborhoods, including a sidered Road 15 i and in this tshore projected ■VV- Mm 4 ‘ a-'M k^•r^ li h: il^v. JUDE, 1980 I AND US£ wm.:\ . «V'V .4 6.COMMERCIM. AND «00STRI^Adversely AFFECT neighboring^^sid^^tij^ The brcontrolled so as not to encroachdevelopment will be concr orono. upon the tural land forms or buffers 7. — — ” __ ..,«TTxnTP FOR ALL FUTURE COMMERCIAL,PUBLIC URBAN SERVICES MUST BE AVAIW^^^ industrial and urban-density residential commercial, where municipal sanitaryuses will be permitted only wner sewer, adequate ,, m addition,ro:re«tri/trdi:::i:rand^-uiti-ia»iiy^te^ v:;:i°»yste»''i“av:u^ble for adequate water supply_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ and fire protection 8e allowed to infill exis ^ environmental the urban ““^nri^rinq capacities of water,limitations and with the exisci y recreational f!ctuttes^"“2L*'deve?opment will not be J:“ierburden ‘Aese^services^.t^the^expense of^th^ per«!ttld“trU requires additional unplanned local or regional facilities capacity. 9.the existing urban area will not f community nSt“be expanded into thef„:arrr:a*:rd‘rrbr:e-lie^nd facilities Wi^ rr riUwtrg tnrrers:d“d::^l:^n:nr^n^hese areas. SI” is'is'^ss “«'ssss»r amounts P v,,»4ahts will be designed to rs^rrpr^ieci^In oJ’these values for all urban residents. CMP 4-18 • •'*•**" - V jL_:L v:‘i C: N I ti*. ‘-mm'^mm ,..-:afP^ m ^r:v I# 1 m m ‘ k « • -’^i^yamsasx r .«r=e 3Sia ■Vt«t ^o/f*i OVOW NMOVra — dl«X«NI»>Cf a -V/- j. ; j ----^-r¥—t^ 1 JI n '\ V s f^wtaaa <k. .•€ bfi \3 »(?; >?s i|’r> bIr a % ■71 at ;i>?^^: V 1 “ i V- mminmj Wl n' ..' ■■ f. .. '.■.:i. Alan P. DEVELOPI ISSUE # The Rel existii require McDona applic The b Compr the 5 zonir The ^ B-1 « Area Lots lot .V, ti ■ <ri mmasB 11 Wm :. ■ ' V-'.. ..•, Alan P. Olson, City Planner development review August. 2» 1983 #766-767-768 ISSUE #2 SUBDIVISION application #767 i. o„ «i..w "5‘2t5’ivr.s;» ” " KSi“"c<r‘E°‘.^“^-4iS UcS;.5“s 1..;...— -«■ .ppUoatlon _________ .«.»<' 1 ”“. a purchase agreeiue . _ •«<! that any change eoielv o*' as shown on the economic ‘^®^^®^nonalds. Considerations problems. 4-vnicallY required by McD . ^ land, access S;inin,un, If^^t^dl^l'dralnage? grffS °Lifof City’s ?Lations ,^tc^ are jalid^f If these ^consider at ions #4, then the tiry as submitted.as submitted. • with the 4- of the subdivision is ^he intent of the'^zoning code. Separatio^^^ fPfitice a?efwhile the Thr"llrge%etidential lot Metropolitan Urban Service ^;L"a^d^fined%^he MUSA line. _ _ _ __ re proposed lot lines^are^lo9icaU/^^l|p^^^ f^r'fu^urf resUivision af ^;;f^°P"‘;Se retilt will lively be internal street connecting _ _ _ _ _reouirements -internal street connect. ,eguiren«nts for Lots 1. 3 and 4 Ifewise meet all lot area and width; B-1 required Lot 1 Lot 3 Lot 4 Area (Acre^- --?An^ 0.000 s 459) 45,838 sf 254,570 sf 57,930 sf (1.05) (5.84) (1.33) 150 ftt 520 ftt 225 ft - ^ j¥S • -■m i U$mm DEVELOP! ISSUE # Circula of this adequat entire 1. A ;5%i: 2, 1983 7-768 ipied by an >n is jsired for of this snce only. d into Lot #4 ise them sly on the \siderations nd, access City's iderations ape of Lot e design I the Intent of nmercial ceable• while the Urban Service ,cre rural t flexibility Lstent with Lkely be with a lirements for th Tt ft± ftt ft ms V V.a DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISSUE #2: SUBDIVISION APPLICATION #767 #766-767-768 Page 2 1. 2. 4-u^h will affect the final configuration eS loSJ.^?c?ally zoned area. These items include: Dedication of 33 ft for BroOT ' This is consistent with typical wav and with the collector classification of Brown Road. It is also sufficient to accommodate all current and future improvements needed to accommodate commercial access. Dedication of at least 10 ft additional right of way an along Wayzata Boulevard. This is necessary to accommodate expected channelization of , including a right turn lane into this property, and also to accommodate the necesary City sewer an water laterals. This dedication will shif. the site improvements and rear lot line northwar . Even if this dedication were not required now, the site plan should be redesigned to provide this extra room because these a1 changes are all but inevitable. McDonalds would be foolish to risk future disruption by not anticipating these changes. And the City must be assured that sufficient room will always be available for on-site parking. A commercial service road should be planned to serve all B-1 properties including Wear's existing Orono Shopping Center. Such a road need not all be built until additional commercial development occurs. However, the location must be planned now J© that sufficient right of way can be preserved of this plat. This location affect lot line locations, grading and drainage plans. A feasibility study is in order to determine the optimum location. The proposed direct access onto Brovm Road from Lot #4 should be redesigned to utilize the beginning of the service road. The proposet’ direct access onto Wayzata Boulevard is suggested as an unplatted "easement” that is designed with a curve to serve McDonalds This should be redesigned to serve the other ®“1 properties and be platted as an outlot or as part of the service road system. The reauired drainage system design including retention pond will also affect the size of L©t 4 and/or the platting of drainage easements as well as the layout of the parking lot. 3. 4. 5. 6. DEVELOPW ISSUE #2 Finally agreeme (especi for pub road se RECOMME Prelimi drainac DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISSUE #2: SUBDIVISION APPLICATION 1767 #766-767-768 Page 3 Pinally. conditions of subdivision aPP-al rer4riai?/°v?rdrnrf^^^^^^^ r/orKord-srdt’r,? sirv?cr^ recommendation Preliminary plat aPP ‘'®Y*3i'‘®tte plardetignrfol^McDonalds. drainage, access and final sir f "if^ ■ .rK:' • :.»>■ ‘ 767-768 3 ide development Its issessment service Ians for Ids. h. \ ■ S ■M ■. * - !' ^7C7 ^i5T>AJ<9 PAftfeC 1' 1 ?. f L- i 6 i 1 > t l-.jvr— m _____KMMW wm%^w • < I V£r >a. 5k js h ^ TM' /V //^ SEC. 34, T. 118, % \ Mil sec ; 27, T no, R. 23 *H»«C3W it- \ K'^i aiTuOT A itXilYi Isaatgy- -------7WW“*^^----- ' V >„. ' ^£tr-rj-yy'.:sr: •ii ^ !S * .••r = ,..v << / A— |N «•«' Arj«» |ivS? ,..... ^jp *J (0 f* tiOO ifV •* •••• v%i*«t •# %••• injr TflT II •&<v! .di 1 t 1 .-•••••_#»• h JSgjS^J I»« 1 JM • • l!> r A4AA e } 1 4 1 •"’ l-T i *■** im 1 \ (._J^ . • . _____ •'•»« M f* ' All V • ••l« • *** 5 «S 1 ft*• ••*'•* •» • : 2 * • * w iV:-•#»•If 1 tfL** r Ml *• r4^, «•*«# .V7T«^ DUE !S3C I (.» I I :; Ji>\o^ • r ^ 1 I ’*•••• |.» |1M«1 Vf •• .* •'•0t%» •t'^ m !• *v ^ —-TlJt II fri*--^ BURLINGTON northcrn RAILROAD 4. _K !^ if t MB.Sf • ' m$U .t## #/ S^8^0^jf§ w «C«t«44 • • !/•1 r«■ 1 t« 1 »t |M.I__1 1 I.-J • ^ %••• »«PT 1 4»«»l Ay**. U» Atili^tir *^. PRELIMINAF lAJ^ PAIUCL U8, R. ••if l¥irm ••MM »>i •* »M - HO* •^IMC •» •••• GV I •‘ 'vJ ' 1;'' mu .«M rn'tfsm^rt m> H,iKi mm !•«« HIM iMl •€•»,( m tm/t *f99 . %m **'. HD pi i i . p- f v*» 41167 jMV: PRELIMINARY SOSDll/f^^^ PLAT AND PROPOSED REZONING FOR. ■ long ri^WOODS^ S«4.M •• •'//i • hfc'- Isf^' #1:-; !■- V X ** pi^TlUCTK:vs^ •*«»t ^ P- • • -----1 \\kzi ' ■'IMO-, ipi ? '8 ----^ t. >r I, ' I r. ; -: • v-> PRELIMI / / / 767 J •<*■<:-i^s »♦**1 ’^■ • fc» t \mwP09e» /, "• UNC ^:: 4-m nif W. ?••' ■•■•":•“'frk - ' ;?'*: . IMMPP««. IIA H II ■■ -------- 3»^7 fUavm jUFLO^^f^ CC^Ff6(fi(A7fC^S_ PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PROPOSED REZONING FOR : LONG LAKE WOODS if"! r-^' n 6MW*I RP H»KAT<**> •5SPT — — II >lr I- •,» !%r:- - 'nf it 1 If? l! m ■ -j? Si.- ^•;r >hmt'^k . •i»"^ , i ’■.i , , . r: :V'^- The Coun 1983 for Wayz foil All Wril rev: Cit; BY: To FOR IDS \ ' *\ l‘’ QpMrfkl RP M»KATI*«> 3?fT \ • •/ • } I / ^ t •u • / Srr,. ^ V %> I' iO;»nil • il W~^8 irL_«:L > ••0* CITY OF ORONO NOTICE The Planning Co^ission wiU^^^^^^ llSr at 7“«®pS on iheM??er of Ti^ for ; ^ropisld subdivision of property l^ated at 2060 lllzltl Blvd consisting of 42 acres creating 4 lots as follows: A 32 acre residential lot not to be developed at this time, a 1.3 acre „ northwest corner of Brown fTlahwav 12. a 1 acre commercial lot to me immediate west of the Orono Shopping Center and a 5.8 acre commercial lot now by residence at 2060 Wayzata Blvd, not to be commercially developed at this time. All persons wishing to be heard will written comments are solicited. Plans are available for review in the City offices. City of Orono BY; Planning Commission Jea^i^e A. IMabusth, Zoning Administrator To be published in the August 3rd edition of the Sun Newspaper. Alan P. Olson, City Planner July 26, 1983 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW #766-767-768 ISSUE #3: REZONING (File #768) This question should be the least controversial and easiest to answer. The request is to rezone a strip of land approximately 50 ft wide X 1,276 ft long from RR-IB to B-1. The practical effect is to move the B-1 District boundary north to align it with the north line of .the existing Wear property, to include all of the existing buildings on the Reber property, and to facilitate more logical lines for subdividing the residential property from the commercial property. Mr. Reber and Mr. Wear made this exact same request in application #308 which received preliminary Council approval on February 23, 1978. The rezoning was never finalized at that time solely because Ml. Reber never returned to complete his concurrent subdivision application. There is nothing in the record to indicate why the existing zoning district was legally described as it is, or why this description cuts thru the rear of the Wear property. RECOMMENDATION; Planning Commission and Council should conceptually reapprove this rezoning request to be finally approved at the same time as Mr. Reber receives final approval for his proposed subdivision, thereby assuring that the zoning line will follow legally described lot lines and not bisect lots as it does now. PRELIMINAF ruly 2S, 1983 >766-767-768 easiest to .y 50 ft wide ^ect is to 1 the north I the existing )re logical :he commercial Ln application February 23, solely because subdivision cisting zoning description lid conceptually 3d at the is proposed ill follow b does now. ^ n<' 1?^ I ^ •Rt<3^C'eS'T A.f^oUc 7-^ ir3 PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PROPOSED REZONING FOR : LONG hy WOODS S^.M Mi t%!1 i iW~-!jii» LA. Yr/Oi 4¥ ///t I I f «• • • — • • • • • If- •'>1 :»S; 1 .A^ tMOOO tia. • L--r^a /"I K-'!. W/SHvSy Fv i' - --------1 rii*' "}_i-'i •<' ?1 tpi {Y \___a: 111 —‘j-------•« \r '>.V* * mm ■•w . >'; ii mm ■mY.k'mm « • Mr. A City City Box 6 Cryst Dear subdj beinc m propc west RR-11 •. • *-Ih. . • . oUc ?'H »3 fN^* •^1 — ■t<'f., «/ •:7^- I .V ‘‘J— I ■>.. Ia ■ii ■ 1-. .1^ := ■ •.' • •AV ■y^'- 1'-# .mm iiT, wmm: •4 J. -miM ' lull -wr i-m • k JUL I 51983 > M***'* »* •i CITY OF OROi- July 6, 1983 Mr. Alan P. Olson City Planner City of Oro»no Box 66 econoCrystal Bay, Minnesota 5532j Subject: Rezoning Dear Mr. Olson: I understand Mr. Sid Rebers is making application for a subdi5is?oranrrezoning to the City of Orono. The rezontng. suDdivision strip of land that crosses the rear of my pripLty%nd continues^Slt\o Brown Road and west to Rebers west line. I request with Mr. Rebers that this strip be rezoned from RR-lB (2 acre residential) to B-1 (commercial). Very truly yours^ /? ■H A. mm' • ^ The Pla Chaunbex 7:30 P. the res The res the noi the noi Brown ] follow: That p. ship 1 northe; as deS' as fol Common Quarte second a dist East a East a second point 18 min east 1 ter min All pe are sc £or a Boning, jf my Rebers ned from - I '’^1. ■H r K'^ m W-' ' jAi H m 4 ^ ■■ -y.: .2^-2lA '*;'f- ‘'-m .•••• ■T-r'^—.l^’..- ifl CITY OF ORONO NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold a public bearing in the Council chambers at 1275 Brown Road South on Monday, August 15, 1983 .. - 7^!oI“ on the natter of Sid Rebers and William Wear s application for the reioAing 6f a property located at 2060 Wayzata Boulevard asking for: •t The rezoninq of a 50 feet wide residential zoned property that abutts follows: That part of the East ^f®^{J°’^5th°PriScipal”^M^ridian^2hioh'lier* iriellked !^®DSc!^nt'No!l52iu'and ij^ngiouAhlAirofTunA described as follows: commencing at the northwest co^er of |„^tro"legrlL"5l Quarter; thence on “ faJ Lst Half of the Northwest Quarter seconds West along the t l degrees 18 minutes 37 seconds lat“a““taLe ofi45!7l feet, thence North 2 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds nil I dtirarce Of 188.93 feet, thence N^^ JL^rtHaid Z^Tllnl] the roirt'^lf^ninntirorthl liL^ jo^ ^Lf UnrorthrSSfthwelt Qutr?ero1 iLd section'34 and said line there terminating. - % All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this ti^. Written comments are solicited. Plans are available for review in the City offices. CITY OF ORONO BY: /S/ Planning Commission Jeanne A. Mabusth Zoning Administrator it •:/v: iL! -^ .r- s iMi Alan DEVELOPI ISSUE # Drainag There h Wayzata increaf measure This r€ submit to be 1 Depart! the CH Orono'; distri< Lake M northw of dev this t LL-1 & of fiv LL-2 f Lake. Lake. large at th] qualil in the propel study LL-1 ' which being at th The L large the C alter Minne sewei creeV sepal Council 83 at pplication for rd asking for: that abutts located on t edge of described as tion 34, Town- n which lies way No. 12 a line described i Northwest I minutes 23 Jorthwest Quarter ites 37 seconds ninutes 23 seconds minutes 37 west line, the bh 87 degrees c less, to the said line there Written comments :y offices 3»n tor .VJ*mm wm August 2, 1983 Alan Olson, City Planner #766-767-768 development review ISSUE #4: DKAINAGE (File #767 S #766) —— - - - - - --- -- serious concern with this property. Drainage and flood control is a very ser ^^^ner of Brown Road and There have been %.j-ther downstream. Any development or other increat,®?n^h«dcover will aggravate this situation unless remedial measures are taken. This report is an initial overview only, ^he developer^will_^have^to^^^ submit detailed drainage ^ p„Slic Works Coordinator, Minnesota tHe reviewed by the City Engineer and «°"|hed District and perhaps. Orono- s Surface Water no“into‘'Long^“an’'tnd^ K the^districts stage S?’"SvelopS;^nt?''“hr?Wrd''district (LL-1) requires detailed review at this time. »- into sub-subdistricts making a total LL-l & bI-3 are each further ^ty as identified by MCWD. of five drainage patterns on th p P Y ll-2 flows directly into Dickey |"eerdowns?ream from Dickey Lake. LL-3 flows directly °"“|^airipproximately 2/3 of theLake. Together, these two suudistricts d^,^ undeveloped large 32 acre residential Lot 2. S drainage location, quantity or ^L^^iy.^^rnlyThrnJh^s farg^lot s Fur^ ^?opfrty“triatis£y thfSfty" However, MCWD has requested a complete study of the entire property be done now. This is the drainage systemLL-l on the otherhand is extremely,oritic^^.^.^^ property which is which is already °''®rlee ' ^ ^j,g proposed McDonalds site i m r'onsists of surface drainage from an extremely The LL-l drainage system c^sist creek next to Kenny’s Market in large area all directed flooded and may need extensive the City of Long Lake. Tnis cree^ alteration before much longer.axucJ. -- - - - - - J a. Minnesota Department of “^^^^^P^^g^^f^ce^water^before^discha^ -rek KfidrKfnfy.s!^1h^ L^bLrwe^r^r^operty drainage divides with two separate outlets under Wayzata Boulevard. 1 m- <■ U’t' V ■- Issue 4 Page 2 The west signif ic the higl office 1: the Lone The easi Departmc Road, a'. Brown Rc south s: the cree property plans. MnDot w: locatioi Most liJ require of disci accommoe Reber's Because appears where tl plan le< proposee suf ficie deter mil In addii MCWD an( sewer s] despite feasibi! cities < total w< the Reb< There i. The proj This sii volume < st 2# 1983 766-767-768 m•V. ^ h this property, rown Road and lopment or other :ss remedial will have to I turn will have >rdinator, Minnesota District and perhaps, L983 attached. jubwatershed Lake and thence 5W generally Dr the current stage ailed review at ricts making a total d by MCWD. tlet creek to Long earn from Dickey ely 2/3 of the emain undeveloped on, quantity or I and developed part of the Reber :ed a complete j drainage system property which is Donalds' site is from an extremely Kenny's Market in and may need extensive ditches and storm harging it to the ivides with two . >- A Issue 4 - Drainage Page 2 The western half of the Reber's property, most of the Wear property and a significant part of the adjacent Ringer property all surface drains into the highway ditch to a culvert in front of 2120 Wayzata Boulevard (Wear's office building), then under Wayzata Boulevard and around the back of the Long Lake industrial area to the outlet creek. The eastern half of Reber*s property drainsdirectly into the Minnesota Department of Transportation highway dirch, or a ditch alongside Brown Road, all .coming together at a MnDOl .ilvert on the northwest corner of Brown Road and Wayzata Boulevard. This crosses under the road, down the south side of Wayzata Boulevard, and then back under Wayzata Boulevard in the creek beside Kenny's. This is the most critical system on the Reber property, and it is also the system most affected by the current development plans. MnDot will be reviewing the capacity of their storm sewer system at this location. Most likely both MnDOT and MCWD, not to mention the City Engineer, will require a retention pond to eliminate any increase in quantity or velocity of discharge into this MnDOT culvert. This will have to be sized to accommodate the potential commercial development (hardcover) on all of the Reber's property that drains to this culvert, not just McDonalds. Because of topography, the only logical place for such a retention pond appears to be at the corner of Brown Road/Wayzata Boulevard, exactly where the proposed McDonalds' site is located. McDonalds' proposed site plan leaves no room for such a pond. Therefore, it seems likely that the proposed McDonalds’ Lot 4 will have to be enlarged north and west to make sufficient room for a retention pond. The exact size of the pond can be determined only by an engineering study. In addition to on-site planning and facilities like retention ponds, MnDOT, MCWD and/or the City of Long Lake may determine that the existing storm sewer system is overloaded to the point of needing additional capacity despite any retention on this site. In this case, a joint storm sewer feasibility study and improvement project would be necessary with both cities and the watershed district participating. This would involve the total watershed including properties in the City of Long Lake, not just the Reber property. There i' no maximum hardcover regulation for the B-1 zoning district. The proposed McDonalds' site plan indicates approximately 83% hardcover. This site alone if developed as proposed, would therefore add considerable volume of runoff to this drainage system. m 4 ■ •f- i . ; Issue 4 Page 3 Finally plan wo This sh roads a control RECOMME 1. Req cal LL- coir 2. Def acc 3. Def ntumi- W:Si •V , V'S< _ _ _ _ .. , ar property and a face drainsinto Boulevard (Wear's d the back of the Minnesota longside Brown hwest corner of e road, down the zata Boulevard in tem on the Reber current development r system at this H:V ^ Engineer, will lantity or velocity > be sized to )ver) on all of the IcDonalds. I retention pond rard, exactly Is' proposed site ns likely that the 1 and west to make E the pond can be / sntion ponds, MnDOT, 5 existing storm tional capacity Lnt storm sewer ssary with both i^ould involve the j Lake, not just ning district, ly 83% hardcover, ce add considerable 1 I L'T- r -,5# ^ i -y:m V- •. Issue 4 ~ Drainage Page 3 Finally, site grading plans are required. The proposed McDonalds site plan would indicate a great deal of excavation required to level the site. This should be reviewed in detail for effect on the remaining properties, roads and drainage systems. Also required will be vegetation and erosion control plans. RECOMMENDATION 1 Reauire submittal of detailed grading and drainage plans and commefcial development of the B-1 zone. 2. Defer subdivision approval for final configuration of Lots 3 & 4 until accommodation is made for the retention pond system. 3. Defer McDonalds' site plan approval for the same reason. PRELIMINAF m ;Donalds' site > level the site, ling properties, :ion and erosion ins and cshed district tion of total Lots 3 & 4 until on. 4 Vi -el .... .'V iK ^ I -r. k ■M, ■# V' i ■, i’ •/> WBS9P* •pgAlUAiSE ^OSy/^weos PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PROPOSED REZONING FOR .¥1(^7 LONG Jl}WOODS ^ti 0t S*<4 /^\gy V • f cou/ERT . 7 r /fc t .w.—. ./ / I ■•••;^—4 ......../ 1 -••--/i-^‘i *V — ir-dvu/MT5 --------------------1 W/GHW/S'""V" i r hi 1 •*i»*c r.:t ;;:i?-1 !«• »• 1 CRITICAL ARC/) P)2tfBA0l£, KCT€*rne«? pe<k/D CULVUtrS -r» ctteuc . • V’ I \ I w 3 I j(J N ^ • ■ •'*' •. ■ -j* 1» CItCkK upe. <MKT J TABLE 1 (Continued) SIMULATED STORM WATER RUNOFF HYDROLOGIC DATA Total Acres Runoff rnefficient Acres Feet Runoff Storage Acre Feet Maximum Depth Feet Watershed 23.0 .358 41.0 .349 83.3 .419 35.0 .410 35.7 .428 104.0 .420 4.11 7.16 17.45 7.18 7.65 21.86 3.03 9.78 20.62 7.73 7.02 14.90 35.0 .435 7.61 7.60 24.1 .517 6.23 4.97 23.0 .420 4.8 1.1 92.0 .407 18.7 17.8 .33 .59 .67 .3834 .9 .18 .67 1.07 .16 .72 Long Lake Watersh^ 280.0 Tl-3 icres .ooded Maximum Flow C.F.S. If m.- Jtf/S .1^' L?t.-.. % la'l. ^i^.,^i^ii•W^»L:l* luiul; a iJi \T ; Z) TABLE 2 (Continued) ,^:’ S::i.WETLAND AND MARSH REQUIREMENTS^ ♦J <D fe:. \ lame *;».vvr.v.:--. .-•••.^ BBlOa ^iBlOb 10c 'OTAL 18.0 kg Island Watershed ahpiyata Island V/atershed 27.0 14.0 41.0 9.0 ^ong'ITake Watershed IPfTa 248T o ^20.0 •: • i‘A . X. ^ r’* C r^ O cO t3 *tJ W) C <A 0) iH •3 Tj X •rH *r^0> X o o 0) ^<D 0)O 4-^ 4->U 4-»cu rx bO cd bO !-• *H 3 a •^iH *r4 cd rt *H •H 4J iH O 3 rH ,2<: (0 ^ -H U 3 iH 4^O' oj (J o>O cd o cr o* td O O a> 3 :3 V4 4-» >4J 0)0> 3 vu a*pt: O'Q <CO <CO ptJ Dtf O' Acres Acres Acres Lbs. Lbs. 72.66 173.00 27.68 273734 AlLa KLb 66.0 16.0 15.0 3.0 5.0 1.0 160 32 228.36 55.36 TOTAL 82.0 18.0 o l92 283772 93.42 48.44 141.86 858.08 238.74 83.04 T2-4 Acres Ac.Ft. Ac,Ft. % 55 1.0 .96 1.52 158 227 1.07 4.33 403 76 0.5 .58 .33 57 69 6.0 120 43 1.0 131Tr.87 15.5 10.46 15.0 4.74 7.86 24.98 158.96 4.69 8.02 2.66 4.40 "1 ^£0 ^ MIIUNEI WATER p.O. Box 387, Wa •OMO OF MANA6CNS: DwM M. Coelwtii, Pr«*. • Albt July 29 ■,s. Jear City Adn City of PO Box < Crystal Re:76 76 76 Dear Ms In resj applies follow^ T c r r t < 15.0 4 7.86 166 )8 158.96 636 S9 8.02 171 56 4.40 42 4 4 mi 76C 7(^7 BlW -re- MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT AM.____S5391P.O. Box 387, Wayxata. Minnesota 55391 iOMW or MMACm; • MIcIimI t. C.n.11 DmH H. CMHrtE. Pfw. » — July 29. UKI MIMMTOIIK* ;.s. Jeanne A. Mabusth City Administrator City of Orono PO Box 66 tc'19'iCrystal Bay, Minnesota bb3Zi Re- 764 - Calvary Memorial Chur^ 766 - McDonald's Cotvoration 767 - Sid Rebers - Subdivision ^ © [ 3. i • AU6-2W i ’ • CITY OF ORONO iiU* Dear MS. Mabusth: rentionedi;sr»“ r.ss srs ;xs. — »■.. •«■—*“ following comments. • 1 rhiirrh - Variance unconditional use. aivary Memorial Church - variance Theconsistent with pas^it|L|^2 review the application, the 1 i--i„de ',fr:«:’4‘B sK K““ ”•'* k'siSiSS STJ.2 «•"lkrAsB/K.n;T.«%E ... *“ development • Ms. Jeanne Page Two July 29, IS 767 - No constr Grading a Should yc Very tru' EUGENE A Enqin WITERSHCO lOUHOAit / ned er the to be jtormwater strict will II include an outlet ' \ubmit a prowi sions The quadrant )rt the the rate of of the Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Page Two July 29, 19B3 preliminary plat t*”" to detetmine the ??S?vfdiaY draiHage basins nmst a9ain be^clarU.^ ^ -- -‘Slpiii xrtar-tf 'ii„ra"S SrarnaSe Plan, a Pr®":;"/-^thra P^rca^t «ill be c:rcS?ltir4*to sup.rt the Pinal .radin« *™* "*ti»rized for each individual project until receipt of a trading and Drainage Penait ir« Should you have any questions or problems please Very truly yours iss.;; Clifford Keep mm m X ■:■■■ !# \ ■» ? t t m. Alan P. DEVELOP ISSUE I ACCESS 1. 2. 3. 4. EXISTIK 1. Alan P. Olson, City Planner DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISSUE #5: ACCESS & CIRCULATION August 3, 1983 #766-767-768 ACCESS ISSUES deal with the following concerns: 1. Traffic safety: This affects design and location of driveways, intersections and traffic controls to minimize hazards and conflicting movements. 2. ..Adequacy of public streets to handle commercial traffic including volume of cars, pavement condition, axle loadings, lane width and intersection configuration. 3. Providing adequate bi-directional access to all business properties. 4. Planning to accommodate future development and future highway improvements. EXISTING PROBLEMS in the area include: 1. Brown Road: This is a residential collector street which IS not now capable of accommodating commercial traffic. Current traffic count is 1400+ cars per day. a) Construction: 5-ton axle loadinq, oiled based, rural cross section. Pavement is* at best 22 ft wide which is less than 2 full lanes. A minimum 7-ton design is needed for commercial use. Sight Distance: There is a deep dip about 600 ft north of Wayzata Boulevard. Northbcpund traffic can not see southbound traffic posing severe sight distance problems, especially for a proposed left-turn access into the McDonald's site just near the top of the rise. Intersection: The steep incline of Brown Road at the intersection with Wayzata Boulevard is hazardous in the winter when icy conditions contribute to cars sliding out into the highway traffic lanes. There have been seven accidents including three personal injury accidents at this intersection in the last 2*5 years. 1' '‘11 #766-767-768 Page 2 )epartment ly 12. : Minnesota .1 as the ars per day. I * oad VV ifcr Im s on the for 911 two instead raffic levels about 1990), to be upgrading most likely nstruction. except at Shanghnessy A le four traffic i with two turn lanes ‘xists now. A if: Y:.jX.u,p m.:. im .f Li:; •••■V'■; ■r kS¥m DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISSUE #5: ACCESS & CIRCULATION #766-767-768 Page 3 This type of change will decrease conflicting traffic movements and therefore will improve traffic flow and greatly improve traffic safety. It also mandates development of coordinated access points to serve the commercial properties in Orono, including Reber's property and Wear's existing Orono Shopping Center. PROPOSED SITE PLAN McDonald's proposed site plan suggests access locations and designs intended solely to serve McDonalds. Access to the remaining Reber's property is not planned, and would result in a piecemeal multiple access situation in the future. This would tend to exasperate the existing problems. McDonald's proposed Brown Road access is designed to provide them access to a controlled intersection in anticipation that median construction on Highway 12 would otherwise preclude direct access to or from eastbound traffic. But it doesn't serve the other commercial properties. And the present condition of Brown Road makes any commercial access here totally unacceptable until Brown Road is widened and rebuilt to handle the traffic and turning movements. McDonald's proposed Wayzata Boulevard access is at a good location, but the curved configuration does not allow multiple use by the other Reber property. Ownership and maintenance of the proposed "easement” must be clarified, preferably by platt' itj an outlet. Finally, the configuration should be redesigned t-i rt^vide for square intersections with the highway and internci^iy with other future users. COORDINATED ACCESS The solution to all these problems is development of a coordinated access plan to serve all of these commercial properties in Orono. The plan can be implemented in stages as the actual need arises, but it must be fully planned now at the time of this subdivision so that McDonald's site can properly relate to it, so that necessary right of way can be reserved, so lot lines and zoning lines are properly located, and so that future development can be accommodated in a logical manner. Initial review by Minnesota Department of Transportation, the City Engineer, John Gerhardson, Mel Kilbo and myself is that a service road should be developed that would run from Brown Road to Shaughnessy Circle, and perhaps beyond all the way to Willow Drive. This will allow controlled bi-directional access to Highway 12 at improved intersections, with individual commercial access off the service road instead of the highway. Bill Wear has already indicated that he favors development of a service road that would serve his shopping center although location and land acquisition details need to be worked out. I r ■ ; i DEVELOP! ISSUE # Locatio highway commerc There a to both Brown R Cost of propert could p with th RECOMME 2, 3. 4. 5. ■KMHMMMIPii*P ifc:- i'. . 1 : "I : ( X X V VI ^ ) — • >• •> 1__ *1 A/;? • • f —- —'—./ . •.-“ I ... 1 1981 P.I.11 131981P • D • 1982 v.r.lo” 101982P • D • 1983 P.I.2 1 1983 P.D. /■ 1 T 1 J 1 A 1 ■ 1 , 1■ « T ^ 1. • 767 \- c».-. \ /• r ^ ’fifM urr TW«M lAUC #• •.• ■ r I » . K'-as ^«r J?’ % H h KH4CJ.wm^v-.‘t. 'ivjiJil nps» aii': «3 4::;. I tei■]j^ ; ■••■:/> ?»-; .. •V\^pr' pn'. ■ ■•? •• ■ Y ■ Alan P. Olson, City Planner development review August 9, 1983 #766 - #767 - #768 ISSUE #6 - UTILITIES propertyhfs^ev:rbeln “anrarsefsment for such°service . That part of Reber's Pr?P®'^ty which n^^g^comprehentive sewer ^trololitan urban service "^i^geSer service. The only practical ^irair°s^Seror:fter's:rvice^or this property is via extension from the City of Long Lake systems. ttuui _ iQTt; at Reber and Wear together^peUtioned ““-.fice":- a-tubTfun^il bong lake-s^srsteli^oa^irity was improved. BILL WEAR PROPERTYBiljlJ IT IXwx.. - - - - - A «i=.ne for Wear to construct tne Back in 1973» the Orono Council approve P . q,y^g first plans and ^Suidat!onerrt\fsued^ ^ slab-on-grade structure. The building construction was ^ery .slow^and ^poradic^^ buUt^^s^buUdlng itt^aiuU basln^;^ iisLa! of a slab. A plumbing and septic system permit was issued in October, 197permit wao — — j i iQ^fi T discovered the full basement and lack After I joined the City in 197 , real problem because State of permits for same. The to be fire sprinklered and Building code requires ®uch a base^^^^^^ supply. I also discovered that inturn requires at least ^ building, again without permits.a smaller waterline was stubbed into the bu^^^^ g^ altering his Sfiais i.«. »;vrfpr?.r.ss»;?o5»r»;y ~rir£p‘;s»?build^g. He was told that no certificate ° gggi„ for fnd ^e:ir"%rirso'':inrri^rctly to Lng baKe. h. 1 R y I5T i m 4 0/ . ■ ^ I'y : y y-.^% N yM ISSUE #< Page 2 For bui or alt< He cho sewer in Sep and s€ recei^ arranc compl* We ha by Lo and p occuj beca\ REBE Rebe whic leve OROt 1 ^v. ' 1983 7 - #768 : the Reber service. led in the insive sewer \e only practical via extension wer in 1975 at le until Long o construct the St plans and slab-on-grade metime prior to ilt his building eptic system sement and lack ause State .ered and that > discovered that without permits. Ltering his tenant into his could be issued ono again for ■M k- V. I r ; • i > ► f hi ■s- m r: 'if- KM F'i'rwm K* * * ■ te-'HHH t- rifiiiiiiiN ' ^ - ' .ib*.-■i* ■ : I; .V; - .. y .iiiS ^y.l < i- * . v i •■ ISSUE #6 - UTILITIES Page 2 1-• #-»n of ”dayli9^^^’^^ Moar had the - *-he basement. He chose t° spr^ sewer as wexj.Is well as water. ^ne Take authorized was already “mpllted and occupied. _ charged to Warrangement o charged to Wear completed assessments '"^^no has collected we have |faf required tor the ''““^mpeUy rnd"°palsef-on MWCC occupancies in thelaundromat. because of a re S55SS_£S2?£S« connected to on-site /ivi «ting dwelling® adequate for ^.evel of useage.^0VC-L “1”tr2nK5 ’““r . of the Medina availability Mayor Kunze""contractually aureed^to t^ , nft oon'sider direct units for Pt°P®^||nson that will consider a reques informed Dick to the agreed-upon 116 u itIts‘=fS“|ygrties^^^^ - Jerv- - ftTs"iUin the agreed-upon 1^ from the allocated these 116 future un Orono has tentatively follows: school complex industrial Area ^ew ChurchFazendin/Cagne •3] * ‘y t azeutiJ-iw - - .on. ..V. »•" "‘‘Tuf s s: .s»“n?BSSH sr/oKSw n"« connected to Long Lake. \ r: % i ■^ ISSUE ^ Page 3 PRACTIC Long Lc Bouleva Orono'£ propt t Wayzata future Long La Wayzata The eng propert B. MCDONALI McDonalc Reber he feasibi] Lake has them. ^ pay for A practi both sevt now, but whenever ISSUES Ring conn> ‘mk ife.; ylighting" casement . ike for line eady d this thereafter narged to Wear has collected arious principally site systems heir existing Long Lake ew" sewer Kunze ler direct a request 116 units. anits as * . V- f J M berrono*s existing presume that br^iraddition »ady directly iS>. % ■ff! J: ■■ .S 111 ff I, ilWBiar .ir*-- ISSUE #6: Page 3 UTILITIES PRACTICAL AVAILABILITY Long Lake has an 8” water main located in part north of Wayzata Boulevard directly in front of the proposed McDonald’s site. Orono's existing 8” water main serving the industrial and school properties joins Long Lake's system on the Northeast corner of Wayzata Boulevard and Willow Drive and includes a tee for a future connection to the east. Long Lake also has a sanitary sewer line on the south side of Wayzata Boulevard at Virginia Avenue. The engineering solution to providing sewer and water to these properties would most likely be as follows: Sewer: Extend a new Orono lateral sewer from the existing Long Lake line at Virginia Avenue across to the north side of Wayzata Boulevard, then westward up the hill as far as needed along the Reber, Wear and Ringer properties. Water: Construct a new Orono watermain loop also on the northside of Wayzata Boulevard between the existing tee on Willow Drive to the existing Long Lake line near Brown Road. MCDONALDS McDonalds has petitioned Orono for sewer and water service Lake has turned-down McDonald's request for direct service from ow, but sized and designed to become part of an overall system whenever the remainder of Reber's property is developed. ISSUES Allocation of available sewer units among all properties fn service now, or likely to petition for sLvice in the future. This includes McDonalds, Rebers Wear inger, Fezendin/Gagne and the existing properties connected to the Orono Schools systems. iffS mi "7t •M r' t, ' ' * '■’•I';:' 'i ' ’ -it.' '' . wm ^ A i ■ A r'y r 1^ K-vB V?.; fc, i -.: . v: V - ry:A -a '. •. ■fUi'i: . •■'^1 At meametSt^ RE( 4. f Wayzata site. and school orner of for a side of to these rice. fh any Long ^ice from .ng to process. egs of McDonalds 1 system I' i iW%m { if C4' '•-‘tel i V wn^'-r ■vtir' ■y-.' r ■ h- \> / ":s’ ,n>4>-t -.i Ki ISSUE 16: UTILITIES Page 4 f Determination as to ®be ®convert^^ service (on two separate lots) s installed, or could continue from the Orono system «na Lake. Long Lake lo receive direct ^°“e if^orono service becomes ::LItble. f®°^°tessmert"foftre%e:"service whether or rotThe riS’dfrrcrrervice is continued. I. Determination as to “''within*the*^f«SA line L not. properties should be must be approvediir.s.%r.:!"S":rb.'!..o “am.— .». «>«•■> designation. 1 •. of a sewer and water project, assessment recommendation • ^ icallv to determine what 1. Call a public hearing p gee^in the way of sewerarea landowners would like to see x anfwater service, or lack of same. £ • u. 4114-v stuciv d©t03rn\xn© “options? roirs:*ri"nln^lnrai^trrLtivei and capacity of the Long Lake system. •4-v, 4-h*. citv of Long lake regarding ^"^‘^rnt^orth:Txisrin^ s^-r .1^ water agreements. . v.a. wav and/or easements in this 4. Reserve sufficient sewer and water lines. This plat to ?t wide strip along the Wayzata |^S?evard fight of way. and perhaps wider. 5. Defer approval of ^he McDonald^s^conditional^use^pe^^^^^ atf Ltf tny^tptotal ®°"tingent upon actual constructior o the first legs of the new laterals. ce inue e comes ctical aether or igne * s or not . Dved tfered egarding >nts. in this les. This Playzata permit at is assured# structior of City of Orono p. O. Box 66 crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Alan Olson RE: Proposed McDonald's Restaurant T.H. #12 & Brown Road North 't.iC. McDonald s Corporation 8030 Nicollet Avenue South Minneapolis. Minnesota 55420-1296 612/884-4355 Dear Sir, McDonald's rorcurrent'^!^h “:;e""oposed development. Sincerely, MCDON^ • S^RPORATION ^ 1 ./■. / / // Gary E. Meyer Construction Engineer Minneapolis Region GEM/pmk i O JUL 1 519B3 >••••«••«••« • ••• CITY OF 0 r* mrr ; V.,^ j « l i p.iyyV**- ’‘Vfir- • vn^r r OJTI rmr* 'i''. - • VJ\ :—rrrrr «K •It> 1 Ml* 1 r h. ill^Jkri Vi’ u [. r«iLTT!-!?-"'r"7 rt'K • t*»•* OANiCtS i. v- .. ■' ••V V rii i - ■i McDonald s Corporation 0 Nicollet Avenue South 5. Minnesota 55420-1296 612/884-4355 *r. •*T T r' I /i^ATtoiog ^ iw>/ge ^ /V //2 34, t: H8, •. »»' • -i?» iiti SEC.; 27. T. liG. H. 23 / .1-/•«# ri#*i» 1 *••» •• /#.♦ ♦»♦ •• iV Itl '• II lt«» .,,••• «lt —HWY:—rt *i ftLVi). : »*«*«--------1 ■ • • • ■« * ■ * ...J <«# n 1 ■A i?"' Uii. 'r ^ > *•* '* \ StRttT ^ *.. * /-^ I 111 M OAfMll.) ••• •: V •! H• ••• •»«» j ’’ *•• 1* •" Li ; . of* -.; ..-. > • • • ....^ •• >/{ IS M tn BURLINGTON northern railroad M •• *41 ■ Ailn, I f • l-» -- - *••* *i*U«l ' y ,/ #.y #W /•"V* „.. wicxiMi ‘•m'T.;’ 1 I__ *r :3|8t ». ■ - .■■■ ■ v^; . iv : :;^■;.■:■:^v^ > January 10, 1975 Walter R. Benson, Village Manager Village of Orono P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Mr. Benson: On behalf of my clients, Mr. and Mrs. '.^illiarr. 'W. ’.rear, I hereby respectfully rocucst and do hereby position for v.'oter and sanitary sev.»er service to the real estate they own and described in Plat 41334, Parcels 3010, 3020, 3022 and part of 3030. • would appreciate being advised if any additional data is necessary with reference thereto in order that v/ater^-and sanitary sewer service can be installed in the summer of 1975. Sincerely yours. A. H. Michals AHM:kq cc: Mr, and Mrs. William W. Wear P. O. Box 245 Long Lake, idinnosota I, Sidney Rebers, the adjoining property owner to the Wear property on Highway 12, join with Mr. & Mrs. Wear in the foregoing petition. Si dfrey f^“ ■V.t nilhi’ • ■ ."fV ■ i#' '^'t I pf- >- :f v:ear, I ‘ v.'oter 1 and Dvirt of al data 5r^~Q,np of 1975. Wear the u m U > J % m REBERS construction company • 3b2S WtBSTtR AVE. • ST. lOUIS February 12. 1975 Sidney Bernhard Rebers, Master Builder ,«|)K. MINN(S0T1 SS4U . ItUfHOKt JI0 tS98 •Nik ^■dk V ; >;. •s Mr. Walter R. Benson, village Manager village of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Mr. Benson: 7 hereby respectfully re,ue=t ana do Petition service to the real estate evened by me and described m Parcels 3024 and 3030. w • r, if anv additional data is necessary I would appreciate being advised if J service can be in- with reference thereto in order tha. sanitary sevver stalled in the summer of 1975. Sincerely yours. rebers construction CO ...'5^By - "S'. Rebe.^s -President SR: jg nr^ X .= -V7 'lb'.nn r? VILLAGE. OF OROr^'O Mr. Dick City Admi C.ity of C P.O. BOX Crstal Be Dear Die ake The highway to he e> ter aia’ct LS/km Enc. - i •' . Tl ItPHONt 92 0-6996 tary sewor 51334, cessary an bo in- CO. dent r:= ,o rp f2- I,- .t: .• . • lb iTji♦ * j VILLAGE OF OROriO MM . •Vr- : K” ■ «*• '“.S :i-f ^kfc' '^7m t'V. ,,< *■/ ,j' /'’ >s.r*^;VT xi..-. •*;.. "«tS 7 YAm mmm Mc COMBS-KNUTSON associates , INC. CONSUITINC ENGINEtRS ■ l»N0 SURVEYORS ■ SITE RUNNERS March 7, 1975 j/jr. Dick Benson City Administrator C.vty of Orono p.O. Box 66 Crstal Bay, Minnesota 55323 subject: «E^^R-REBERS Dear Dick: V. .4 sketch showina the petitioners for a sewor"anrwfter%xtfnsion on Highway No. 12 near Long Lake. There is an 8" ^^^he^sewer would have highway 12 fronting Avenue. Both the sewer and water I^e^owned and operated by the City of Long Lake. Very truly yours. MCCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES,INC. Lyle Swanson „„ ---------------- „ NORTH MR." S'RTT'- "O'CHiHROH- ................ ^ jM *.w # F :vt;> ^ 1-- ynV mS* ■S- 't-: ''y % t BRlMHALL Jlt •C4t4 ?o 5i-:1 ‘i ♦ * ------------ ;.!■ .'■ i • I'.i STlslFlROTADD . se •* I » * ‘ ^i:- ] ‘ - AVE. « ijrTTFTTir 3 I LONG * 1 M ; UAK.E !i.i.,ii;.. .'1.1 1 * ** • • • 4 NS\ - W/ * / / / I 4 / / I mw ■1*3 t'j-.' '4 >1 I^SAi.•:r frrt-v^5 : v:; -;;^-v^ ■• !:^V:\;v:--:V^-'‘'.KP* fT - «n! i-;:;-, •; < ^•- ■ :■•]m :v .f-:- \r^- 1^ ‘ -». I'J.D March 25, 1975 ^ ,... .--nrrtx--s ;?^?r.a=- Reber Construction Company 3525 Webster Avenue Minneapolis, Minnes9Jta»^53416 Sub'i^^t: sewer & Water Petition Dear Mr. Reber; City council of Orono at .^®^fo“gewer^and 1975 considered your petitio elusions on Highway 12. The on March water ex .KS“n™i your petii.-:iion until such time as *,K/a r-anacitv in are made scancerning means of };^^^®^®j^"alternate means of Long Lake’s system or of providing an supplyine skewer and water to your prop y- If ycou: have any questions or need additional inform- ation on -i« matter please call. Very truly yours, MCCOMBS-KNUTSON associates, INC. Lyle Swanson, P.E LS:jl cc: Dick I=-eenson 12805 OLSON MEMOF:3=nn.AL HIGHWAY. MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55441 1^7^1031 bing r and m idles Lnform- CIATES, INC (612) 545-3735 % /t.’i f.: * j ■' ■ ;•■ \;;/Tl|^i>V.;': 5, '■;.. ■ '. ■•4 ■'< V"ivV - . ... -'.'V)»r '■* ; ^.....:: ^ =H r-1it.: : r f »► .'* mi:: ■ /* i'S?i McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING LNGINtERS t. LAND SURVEYORS D SITE PLANNERS March 25, 1975 Mr. Bill Wear Long.,.Lake, Minnesota--* Subject: Sewer & VJater Petition Dear Mr. Wear: The City Council of Orono at their regular inceting on March 11, 1975 considered your petition for sewer and w’ater extensions on Highway 12. Because of the limited capacity of the existing sewer and water lines in Long Lake, Orono can take no action on your petition until such time as further engineering studies are made concerning means of increasing the capacity in Long Lake's system or of providing an alternate means of supplying sewer and water to your property. If you have any questions or need additional inform­ ation on this matter please call. Very truly yours, ?-lCCOMDS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC Lyle Swanson, P.E. LS : jl cc: Dick Benson 12805 OLSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 TELEPHONE (612) 545-3735 36 NORTH MAIN STREET. HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA 55350 TELEPHONE (612) 897-8031 .. . . .. RQ'^n • : 'Lv . ,* ; TO: FRCM: DATE: SUBJECT: Status 1 1.Cop: pen or hoo' 2.The lim fin The law 3.The are par the met , INC. RS iceting 5wer and [ sewer on on [ studies ' in IS of 1 inform- SOCIATES, INC. lONE (612) 545-3735 (612) 897-8031 m 1 FROM: rv- y. • •f-#3 A.:.-. Tim Lv ar::-v h iW Henry F. Mihich, Zoning Adminismtor A. P. Olson, Asst. Zoning Administrator DATE:August 27, 1976 SUBJECT:2160 Wayzata Boulevard Mini-ffart - William Wear Status Report on construction to date: 1. 2. 3. CoDV of Building Permit #2907 dated 12/5/73 - $15,000. Note ewers OTly foundation and exterior wall work - no roof, windows No o*er interior plonfcing, finishing or sewer or water hookup permits are on file. There is no complete set of plans on file for this project, pre- li^arv draw^gs that arc in the file indicate no interior finish or fHTxit^fions. The plans indicate a slab on building The plans do not bear an architect's si^ature as rcquir^ 000 iX for all non-residential buildings with a value greater than J30.000. Th. .rtiial construrtion includes a full basement. The exterior walls uD^it Sr^^f ^s“ot been started. To date there is no i^rior partitioning or plimJiing; havever, there is the southeast comer of the basoaent. The water is on, ^ere is no meter (and no permits or inspection reports cm the hookups;. SUBJECT: June 22. Mr. Ruel code pr< require: Wear ha for rec to spri APO: was adv until r Wear is because suggest Wear w( APO: J to supi APO & least or lef Agreerr Ruehl to spr June prcssi tempo: June wells that this f, windows water The pre- inish or Iding. State an $30,000. or walls no interior stubbed into 5 is no • -V ■ fi- t. ■ -'s TO:File FROM:Alan Olson, Village Planner DATE:_ _ _ July 5, 1978 SUBJECT: 2160 Wayzata Boulevard - Mini Mart (William Wear) June 22. 1978 - Meeting on site with discuss’^building requires fire sprinkler system, A 4-« in Julv 1st consequently he applied Wear has a tenant ready to . interior. Permit issued subject for recent- building pemrt occupancy, to sprinkler system before Certificate or uc v „.ll „» .0 a. cu, -n ««‘”"5"” suggested area wells to basement. wear would now like to install sprinklers but says Orono will veto. «°suprir«ater! rjragfeemirtir!e;uireTbrtw:en\^^^ • or left open with planters for pedestrian protection. rrrif to dft^mLfwrt^^re!::^^ trs!rink!e bSng! No city commitments regarding occupancy. T 9-^ 1978 - Ruehl called Alan Olson. Long Lake engineer believes r.Lur; Available! Question: Is there any way_ to provide a ^ ^ _ _ of Occupancy? APO answer. Ntemporary Certificate of Occupancy? APO answer; T 91 1978 - Wear in City office to Jacobs: He will install area ^ells as temporary solution until sprinklers can be installed. rchitect building permit » applied led subject t Wear o thing problems nklers t time /ill veto. ig Lake two cities. St be at le grates lement. ire required ipancy. leer believes ide a install area ailed. D r^<EeiEllflE SEP 13 1S?3 September lit 1978 CIT.Yt 01- OROIMO Mr. Walter R. Benson, Villace Manager Village of Orono p, 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN. 555?3 Dear Mr. Benson: Hr. & Hrs. William W. l.ear do hereby respectfully r'.ouest and do hereby petition for water and sanitaT-v sewer service to the real estate owned and described in PLAT 4153^ PARC.:LS #3010 - #30?5. I would appreciate being advised if any additional data is necessary with reference thereto in order that water and sanitary sever service can be installed this fall of 1978. Sincerely yours^/^ WILLIAM W. WEAR j!a t I i I • t In ip. October V.’alte City Adm^ City of C Crystal I Dear I*lr. The City watennali describe< I-lr. Wear and bilL The City and sewe; Yours tn AJt Debbie S City Cle cc: Wil respectfully ater and state ov.Tied #3010 - #30?5. ny additional •eto in order • can be October 5, 1973 Dear Benson: P4PPMiiif. a City of Long Lake P.O. BOX L LONG LA KE. MINN. 55356 V.’alter Benson City Administrator City of Orono Crystal Bay, Kdnnesota 55323 The City of Long Lake has authorized V/llliam Wear, to hook up a six inch watenraln and sanitary sewer from the City of Long Lake, to his property described as Plat 4133^> Parcels 3010 and 3025* Wear Is currently hooked into the Long Lake water system, is metered^ and billed directly by the City of Long Lake, The City will continue to meter and bill directly to Mr. Wear, any water and sewer to his property from the City of Long Lake. Yours truly. _^ Debbie Stinson City Clerk cc: William Wear ■ * • - T TO OBDSR I w0’/£ MINWTES >3/78 _______ CLA33^S_P^ v??RavTE CLAH^ TO r?.* *pa :to _______ ;J3UR3W^ CaWWT •^37ICES________ .EAR/WATEH-SB-ra ?70dEST ----- ;OCKEY BOOSTER ro om 1 i six inch property metered ny water ..v?^ m V '■ ■ : ; _-,r % ► X ■ 1.0 m m •> % tf.j ji • ; • '• " HMMiMA H5 5( %»v :-7. TO ordhr •;j •' «?.3'>/E MDWTES >5/78 ■V J»?R07H. CIAIMS TO r?.' PftID. y3lS3AS ca'MUNTn ;370/ICSS *r*. , s •/EAiVW ATER- SB'^ER P -.v::V U; •:OCKE^ BOOSTERS Ropy^ ,-uu:./xN^ Septentoer 19* 197o r-44-M nf Lon K Lake, Hennepin , Ke^ar 7.e^ay. Septe^er 19. County, Minnesota, was neiu 1978, at City Hall. • Mayor Fan^ called the meeting to order.at 7: P- • r*l_3iz.ViGr*•^ A ^(unze Kogan and Gallash®^*Mentoers Present: Famand. Kunse. Mentoers 7: 35 P-™"Me.-iibers late: Adaias at f. 1? H entrances, ^ h ^ selstad Had create a ^ requested,K--€>Lrr»?^asn^ts «ro.- therefore said MlnuT^es do _ -- - -a Vnnr.p to apprc tlUrefore said Minutes as amenu^ Motion ty ™ Ko^. ^vor Moriorcar^ied. Nos. 2I69M thru 21721. AU. v _ . _n- Nos. 21694 thni 2172M. ^ Kunze second by Meitoer 5n favor. Motion!Motion by He-nber Kunze, 21786. All voted m claims to be paid nos. carried. £»M S =‘S^SS?-,*K5'» ««. cut backs inof $500.00 to continue tne p cr r%\ sprinkler his building-sprinkler his building. allow Bill VJear tcf Motion by Mender ^ provided he Kogan. Adams and Gal aghe . Kunze. Motion carried. ’“'■ “Tr.’K«>» -««»“IS; • each Month. All vo - - «___^ Vi rm T O . L ^ch^nth. All voted an XU............ request a clxa-nge ^Cion by M^er /f^win the Ocainances to mt^au change ^1 require two famiues, to^ iTfavor. Motion carried. hearing. All voted in la „.ew,rlze th< rnsp^mmma REGULAR MREl Variance rec Section 34.4 Planning Cor The Planning the variance the five fo( of lot conf and no obje< Council Mee Butler move' request for 4060 Dahl R Butler move the riprap wood Road/ Creek Water Nays (0). The followi of Long Lak Wear* dated "The City c Wear, to he sanitary se his proper! 3010 and 3C Mr. Wear is water systs the City oi The City w: to Mr. V7eai from the C; Paurus mov< letter froi for Williai (Additiona See Pane 2 ^ Lake, Hennepin , Septeniber 19» •in* »er ' 5, 1976 v.*as the iditions or tion of the Duld need 2 rea." "Mentoer alnar,e problem , were requested. ■JPQV0 claims pai<^i carried. ' to approve the id in favor. Moi:ion Services appearej'^; CE^TA funds, , ^ area. Vith tn ^ runding for 1979 ^ from the City M133*», Parcels elling him to allow Bill Wear to rvg Lake to his ata Boulevard, the costs involve 3W the Hockey Wednesday of quest a cliange .1 house over Lre a public Kogan to authorize r;. . • ■ mmtiSSZ REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, OCTOBER 10, Variance required: Zoning District - LR-IB Section 34.450 Side yard required; proposed; variance: 10 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. = 50% Planning Commission Meeting - September 25, 1978 The Planning Commission recommends for approval the variance application of James Neve approving the five foot side yard variance due to hardship of lot configuration, lot width at building site and no objection from neighbor most affected. Council Meeting ~ October 10, 1978 Butler moved, Paurus seconded, to approve the request for a variance of James P. Neve, Jr., 4060 Dahl Road. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Butler moved, Massengale seconded, to approve the riprap request of George Johnson, 835 Parten wood Road, subject to approval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). The following letter was received from the City of Long Lake regarding sewer and water for Bill Wcai;, dated October 5, 1978, which states: "The City of Long Lake has authorized William Wear, to hook up a six-inch watermain and sanitary sewer from the City of Long Lake, to his property described as Plat 41334, Parcels 3010 and 3025. Mr. Wear is currently hooked into the Long Lake water system is metered, and billed directly by the City of Long Lake. The City will continue to meter and bill directly to Mr. Wear, any water and sewer to his property from the City of Long Lake." Paurus moved, Pesek seconded, to accept the above letter from Long Lake concerning sewer and water for William VJear. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). (Additional discussion later in the evening. See Page 23.) RIPRAP* 835 Partenwood Road George Johnson CITY OF LONG LAKE LETTEIj William Wear REGULAR MEET Butler moved Liquor Store report. Mot Mr. Alan 01s Council that Clif French, County Park Letter - Pag Discussion w Mr. Olson to Reserve Dist with their r application CounciImembe Mr. Bruce Ma with the Cit ing the Beck' Farm. Pesek moved. City Attorne; facts suppor Boulder Brid< Nays (0). Additional ii Olson, City.] regi^est for j Mr. Olson sti in the origii upon inspect; Code requires Mr. Wear was fire sprinkl< basement fror preferred mei water supply Long Lake mui now because I into one pari issue a cert: complies wiU Page 12 l/ARIANCE 4060 Dahl Road #426 James P. Neve, Jr. • 1 RIPRAP* 835 Partenwood Road George Johnson CITY OF LONG LAKE LETTEI William Wear h i. f W-T"^ REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, OCTOBER 10, Butler moved, Massengale seconded, to accept the Liquor Store Operations Second Quarter, 1978, report. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). 1978 Page 23 LIQUOR STORE REPORT* Mr. Alan Olson, City Planner, informed the City Council that a letter was received today from Clif French, Superintendent of the Hennepin County Park Reserve, dated October 6, 1978. Letter - Page 24 Discussion was held. The City Council requested Mr. Olson to inform the Hennepin County Park Reserve District, that due to staff time involved with their request, that they pay the normal application fee. Councilmember Paurus left the meeting at 10:15 P.M. Mr. Bruce Malkerson, City Attorney, discussed with the City Council the legal matters concern ing the Beckers, Taylors, and Boulder Bridge Farm. Pesek moved, Butler seconded, to request the City Attorney to draft a resolution stating facts supporting the DNR to intervene in the Boulder Bridge matter. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Additional information was presented by Mr. Alan Olson, city.Planner, concerning the William Wear request for sewer and water service from Long Lake, Mr. Olson stated that the basement was not included in the original building permit but was discovered upon inspection of the building. The State Building Code requires fire sprinkling of such a basement. Mr. Wear was given the option of installing the fire sprinklers or providing direct access to the basement from the outside. Fire sprinkling is the preferred method of protection but requires a large water supply available only by connection to the Long Lake municipal system. This connection . occurs now because Mr, Hear is ready to have people moye into one part of the building but Orono cannot issue a certificate of occupancy until the building complies with the building cc’e. HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE DISTRICT P BOULDER BRIDGE JlATTER m BILL WEAR SEWER & WATER (Page 12) MM A ■:a 1^' mm ' .. •• m mim ■ • 4 u Mr. B 36 Ha Long Minne Re: Dear At t' r cce wate that etc. You subj Cit3 Oroi of * Bui: You con Lon has apF yor Sir Al. Vi AP R STORE REPORT* PIN COUNTY PARK ^E DISTRICT ER BRIDGE HATTER WEAR SEWER & WATER 12) ' w ; Tili p^on* 47.1 i.lj/ CITY of OKON Otr,« Ho. C6.COS... Bay. MinncoU 55323.Mo.ocipa. Ofr.c. On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka October 16, 1978 Mr. Bill Wear 36 Hackberry Hill Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Re: 2120 - -2130 - 2160 Wayzata Boulevard Sewer & Water Connections Dear Mr. Wear: n ^r^v»pr 10 1978, the Orono City Council At their meeting decision to supply sewer and TtT. ^rremriA thr^esponsibility of the City of Long Lake, you should be ^^%AC^ehargL‘'wMch''woul^ theSJTf Tonr^ir^^rdo^-t -Jd^th. -if^^fbe .ty^oj^^^^ TlVAeTJ onrurit'Ls ever been paid for the Midi Mart Building. n eViat the City of Orono does not require t ese You should also recall that the C y service from connections, but only ""<:"P;-^/°“de requires sprinkling of the Long Lake. The State BuiWmg Code requi_^^ basement installed under the Mr t leasible to approved the option o ^tea«ay sprinkling is more desirable, you. We do however concur that P Sincerely, Alan P. Olson Village Planner /y/V. APOikh cc: Tohn Gerhardson, Public Wor s ■? > Minnesota M Department of TransportationW_W§i District 52055 No. Liiac Drive OF-n)/^ Goiden Vaiiey, Minnesota 55422 August 10, 1983 (612) 545-3761 [i@[iDWfI AU6I5B63 l! LCITY OF ORONO Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 S.P. 2713 T.H. 12 Plat review of Long Lake Woods located in the northwest quadrant of Brown Road and TH 12 in part of the east half of the northwest quarter of Section 34, Township 118, Range 23 in the City of Orono, Hennepin County Dear Ms. Mabusth: We are in receipt of the above referenced plat for our review iu accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and Surveys. We find the plat acceptable for further development with consideration of the following comments: - Because there are no future plans to upgrade or relocate TH 12 in this area every effort must be made to protect the operating integrity and safety of the existing highway. An important aspect of this is the necessity to access at the most favorable points along the highway and provide i?t.ernal circulation as a part of the new development. This can be accom- Plished by construction of frontage roads and city streets as a part of the ^development. It appears the most logical access point to this proposed development would be at Brown Road. - Also submitted with this plat was a plan for a McDonalds located at the intersection of TH 12 and Brown Road. The proposed access proposal for McDonalds appears workable. However, we will require turn lanes be con­ structed for the entrance to TH 12. Future plans should be made to extend a street connection from Brown Road to the west just north of the proposed McDonalds property. This would not have to be constructed until the land north and west of the McDonalds site is developed. - Before any construction within the highway right of way begins the developer must have an approved permit from our District Office in Golden Valley. If you have any questions in regard to these comments, please contact Evan Green at 545-3761 ext. 119. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, <CC(^ ^^W. M. Crawford, P.E. * District Engineer cc:Gerald Isaacs, Metropolitan Council Mike Reiter, Hennepin County An Equal Opportunity Employer WMC:bn g) LOFORONO ccordance with plat #ing comments: Z in this area ind safety of sssity to iway and provide :an be accoro- a part of the i proposed ted at the )posal for les be con- ade to extend the proposed til the land s the developer »n Valley. act Evan Green er. =-Vw rv-> r.i .p "F. .}M -■yji V- I - . .r- i TO:Planning Conunission Members FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE:August 10, 1983 SUBJECT:#769 - Lake Minnetonka Homes, Inc. - Preliminary Subdivision Area - 76.4 acres Zoning District - RR-IB Application - Subdivision - Second Stage Development - Plat - Four Lots to be served by interior cul de sac to remain private List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Preliminary approval memo Exhibit B - Curb Cuts proposed in total plan Exhibit C - Sketch of road realignment Exhibit D - Preliminary plan packet The applicant has returned with the second stage plat of four lots to be served by a proposed private road off Countryside Drive. Each lot conforms to the standards of the RR-IB zoning district. Septic test data confirms all lots conform to the Orono on-site septic code. Lots 1, 3 & 4 will sustain standard systems and Lot 2 a mound system. Once again, we will ask that all tested areas be protected during grading and road construction stages. The four lots are the scime as proposed in the overall 40-lot plan reviewed at the first stage plat. Please review Exhibit A. The conditions of preliminary approval clearly state that Outlet A*s development was approved only as far as it relates to the current six-lot plat. As we proceed with more development, it becomes more and more important to act on the overall plan. If the City is asked to approve the 40-lot plat, the following information must be submitted: a.All lot areas designated and exclusive of road areas, retention ponds and drainageways. b.The City had expressed concern that 13 lots achieve access off surroundin collector streets. Staff has sketched a road plan that would permit internal access for all lots and allow all roads to be public within the plat. This is merely a suggestion as the applicant is responsible for adjusting the plan to meet recommendations of the City. c. Existing improvements in relation to lot lines. d. If septic testing is waived for all lots, then applicant must assure future risk of the loss of a lot if one cannot satisfy septic code standards. #769 - L August 1 Page 2 The appl plat mus certainl Commissi surveyor ways, dr Applican lines in If Plann followin' to appro lot stam code hav< Manor pi. 1. Appl road’ 2. Appl. info: 3. Paymi 4. Road liminary Subdivision Plat “ Four Lots to in private f four lots to be . Each lot conforms test data confirms s 1, 3 & 4 will e again, we will nd road construction 0-lot plan reviewed ! conditions of ilopment was approved As we proceed int to act on the allowing information IS, retention ponds •*r access off surroundin that would permit be public within the is responsible for :ity. Licant must assure Lsfy septic code WBmm •r.’. m #769 - Lake Minnetonka Homes, Inc. August 10, 1983 Page 2 The applicant has the option to proceed with the four-lot plat but the plat must be in accordance with an approved overall plan by the City; certainly, the road locations and accesses must be approved. If Planning Commission has no problem with the current road plan, then applicant's surveyor must still submit the areas of each lot exclusive of road right of ways, drainageways and retention ponds. Applicant should advise as to the status of the existing structure as lot lines intersect some and the required setbacks have not been met. If Planning Commission makes a recommendation for preliminary approval, the following Motion is suggested: to approve the four-lot plat of Lake Minnetonka Homes, Inc. finding all lot standards of the RR-IB zoning district and the Orono on-site septic code have been satisfied and that the overall road plan for the Countryside Manor plat of 40 lots is acceptable. Based on the following conditions: 1. Applicant's surveyor to submit lot areas of all 40 lots exclusive of roadways, drainageways, retention ponds 2. Applicant to assume risk of the buildability of a lot if septic test information proves a lot cannot sustain an on-site septic system. 3. Payment of park fee of $800.00, each lot at $200.00 4. Road plans to be approved by City Engineer prior to construction 4 I ; i ■/ !j. i J'V H %’ k mm ■ 1^" ■ CO Ii P h C 1 'A plat but the / the City; i. If Planning applicant's of road right of bructure as lot ^n met. ary approval, the . finding all ri-site septic c the Countryside ng conditions: B exclusive of >: if septic test tic system. nstruction 4 ' -m > 1 Th *-y' '' • fev. •- ...4 FROM: Richard Conry Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE:June 30, 1982 SUBJECT:#654 DiCon, 155 Willow Drive North - Preliminary Subdivisi Conditions of Approval and submittals required for Fi Plat Approval Conditions of Approval 1 - plats dated, revised June 22, 1982. 2 -Outlot A is not platted as part of this s*'«;«.or.. such development must meet all zoning and Comprehensive Plan requirements at that time* 3 -iisifsfi=?si mfi the time the building permit is applied for based on lot line changes made after original septic testing. 4 - subject road during the interim period. ^ to be constructed per plans dated, revised May 10, 1982. 5 -Prior to final plat approval, the developer . regrading, filling, construction of water control device and retention pond per plans dated, revised May 10, 1982. Improvements Required Prior to any improvements being made on the site, the City Engineer has asked for the following changed and additional information; Changes are as follows; 1 -Street section to be 30* wide gravel base 8" thick shoulder P.I. to shoulder P.I. with a 24* wide bituminous surface two inches thick. y a I .■■Tv i--; 'f. TO; FRO DAT SUB LIS Exh Exh Exh Exh Exh Exh Rev Com pos rep was up rem gra The rec pro str own' was Rev Are All Exi Pro inary Subdivision red for Final s and inary t is The 93 acres le current ire« lensive m approved i 14, 1982, 3ptic Code, bion at on lot line The City of said d through execute pkeep of o be 2. complete 1 device and 1982. le City Engineer information: Lck shoulder s surface t%K> r : t,- I # t1 lt»'V m V. TO:Planning Commission FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE:August 10, 1983 SUBJECT: #695 Guenther Roth, 1428 Baldur Park Road - Variance LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Roth Letter of August 5, 1983 Planning Commission Minutes of July 18, 1983 Survey - Lots 17 & 18 Survey - Lot 8 Sample Site Plan - Detached garage on Lot 8 Sample Site Plan - Detached garage on Lot 8 Review the applicant's letter of August 5, 1983, and the Planning Commission minutes of your last meeting. I need not repeat his position - he has stated it very well. I have talked with his representative, George Stodola, and he advises that the garage was always unacceptable on the house side because it would use up most of the green lawn area. If approved, they would gladly remove the gravel parking area on Lot 8 and replace it with grass. The applicant is concerned with Planning Commission's recommendation that no future variances be permitted on the property. He has future plans to renovate the existing structure and asks for the same consideration the other lot owners on Baldur Park have been given. The neighboring property was approved for a 11% excess of hardcover. Review of Existing and Proposed Hardcover Area within 75-250 total Lots 8, 17 and 18 = 6,397 sf* *Lot 8 = 4,097 sf Lots 17 & 18 = 2,300 sf (credit 1/3 of dry area 6,900 sf) 6,397 sf Allowed Hardcover = 1,599 sf or 25% Existing Hardcover = 2,015 sf* or 31.49% - 6% over allowed *1,080 sf house 315 sf gravel parking area 620 sf garage + drive 2,015 sf Proposed Hardcover = 2,008 sf * or 31.38% or 6% over allowed *1,080 sf 528 sf garage 400 sf drive (garage with turnaround on site or at 20' setback off road)2,008 sf #695 Vari Page You hard oppo hous from Plan 1. 2. Plan face a mi leng poin turn (see for 3 - Variance , 1983 Lot 8 Lot 8 nd the Planning ot repeat his ked with his t the garage it would use would gladly e it with n* s ed on the sting other lot ring property sf * rea 6,900 sf) allowed er allowed te or at 20* #695 Guenther Roth Variance Page 2 You are not asked to review an application involving additional hardcover for the house. Applicant can certainly be given the opportunity to apply for hardcover variance for addition to house. His concern now is that you do not limit his property from improvements that may require variances. Planning Commission Alternatives 1, Give applicant option to expand application for improvements to house. Approve application for setback variances for detached garage and advise applicant that future improvements must be limited to % increase of hardcover or just remove condition involving future variances to property. Planning Commission should be advised that if you recommend doors face onto street at 10' setback, I will recommend to Council that a minimum setback of 20' be required at least to contain the length of car before pulling onto road right of way. At this point, I would recommend doors face away at 10' setback with 20'+ turnaround on Lots 17 & 18. Note the hardcover calculations (see above) for the proposed drive are approximately the same for turnaround drive on site or at 20' setback. Citj P.0, Crys additional given the tion to property improvements tached ents r or to commend doors Council that tain the At this ack with 20'+ ulations the same Lusb^ilkj August 5, 1983 City of Orono Planning Commission p.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re : Guenther Roth - Zoning variance #695 Dear members of the commission. business trip out ^ action of the commission In receipt of the notice Road, and I am afraid regarding my prope y completely unacceptable.I find items number 1 and 5 complete y home side of Construction of the garage on ^/hat was Innltlally the road is not what I 198^ At that time approved by the commission on July locationwl were ^"formed by the commission that^the^loc^^ drainage. presented no problem. The etories were the only concerns, knd the ability to o'|PP°’^‘ ?o82 meeting I sent Hr. Curtis fish a contrLtor, to the ^82 with those recommendations* ^ the location was no l°"eer In question. original “i have reLceS ?hrslse. eliminated ?Sl^recSnrstory. and have posmoned the TlaL^?^ Tinrcr^hl ;id garage will be r>3l*rt old run-down garage remain rather «-hat the neighbors by a new sSre°"rep!SceS‘’fn thl Ught of would like to see the , « property. The neigh- the new constuction on ^^rSve^b? our plans,borhoods appearance could only be improvea y BOX 334 . MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA 55440 • TELEPHONE (6121 425-1377 wel be and nei con be IIV lot buj of Th: th< I J tu: qu an ga so ho th of /*. . • • • ..r L983 id am frald de of Innltlally time drainage> concerns. Curtis i complld . 1982 )rlglnal nlnated 5 as to 50 made 11 be the ee the Ighbors ght of nelgh- ans 12) 4251377 ■ % M I 1 V *7 m •.V; '.V- ■ ''jmi P tea** V::’ ■'. aaf mm *icn no for commission fees as. I have spent In ^and’energy for what appears to well as a great deal ‘J“%®2^„^"ob!wtionable qualities be a simple ,^®HtalSirimprove the look of the n^ghSor{JoSd!*'‘?®SoSld hope that the commission will re- ““"""Suh “lgt?f to°the ?S1S'property?rSoJli“ be no further ''®J^f"®®®thi^structures on both sides of my like to polrt out that the str^ ^ ^ planning to re­ lot have recently been appearance and value build my home so as to entire neighborhood, of not only my Pr°P®rty, hut the^®;^ necessary both from This would not as well as my neighbors. the view point of my ^ aonreclate their modern struc- I am sure that they would n it would also seem tures being both of those- homes to be rebuilt quite arbitrary to I would like to get the and deny me of »j^gy^iy so construction may begingarage matter ’^®folved quicklysubmit plans for the soon and wait ® \ necessary, I wiH plans home. However, If ?rthem together. A quick resolution the home prepaid and appreciated.of this matter would be greatly appi Sincerely, if, Cj^enther Roth ■ ■ jj :'V. .3JJ : r -v:-;••S'i i-K,'./* :!-' V':v . ■ MINUTES 0 MACKINNON #695 GUEN 1428 BALD VARIANCE ees as* ears to lltles f the re- e will would of my to re- ralue {. )th from s • struc- seem ebuilt et the eg in r the _ for esolution MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 18, 1983. page 4 MACKINNON (CONT) #695 GUENTHER ROTH 1428 BALDUR PARK RD VARIANCE r- ' 1.Drainageway and wetlands to be designated within the outlet. Flowage and Conservation Easement over both areas. 2. Dedication of 33' of right of way for Watertown Road. 3. New curb cut to serve residence off Watertown Road must be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Coordinator, John Gerhardson. 4. Payment of park fee of $200.00 for residential lot. 5.Applicant be placed on notice of the possibility of problems for a future subdivision of property caused by drainageway and the two acre minimum lot requirement in the area was brought to the attention of the applicant. McDonald seconded. Vote? Ayes (5), Nays (0). Curtis Fisk, the contractor, represented Mr. Roth. Mabusth noted the original application that was tabled by the Planning Commission. She noted that the Planning Commission gave the applicant specific guidelines from their meeting of July 19, 1982, which the applicant has followed precisely. She noted that this application was for a two stall garage, single story, and 10' off the street right of way. Goetten asked about the area in front of the house if it was still gravel. Sime noted that the garage could be moved 5-7' back which would help the hazard of backing out onto Baldur Par k. Mabusth noted that would be possible but that it would bring the garage closer to the wetlands. She noted the direction of the Plai.ning Commission in 1982 to the applicant at that point it was to stay away from the wetlands and to keep everything close to the road. Callahan noted that all the other garages in the neighborhood were on the main structure side. He noted the traffic pattern caused by those garages would be approximately the same but when you have a garage across the street from the main structure then it may pose a hazardous problem. He noted that Baldur Park is already a hazardous road. dp* ■y.A •4' % 4vv MINUTES 01 ,4' ^ ROTH (CON 33.Page 4 ( designated within servation Easement way for Watertown (Off Watertown Road by the Public Works 00 for residential of the possibility Lvision of property :wo acre minimum lot iS brought to the (5) , Nays (0) . resented Mr. Roth. tion that was tabled le noted that the ipplicant specific July 19, 1982, which fly. She noted that tall garage, single ght of way. nt of the house if it be moved 5-7' back mg out onto Baldur >le but that it would itlands. She noted ission in 1982 to the stay away from the close to the road. her garages in the structure side. He d by those garages but when you have a main structure then He noted that Baldur i. . • >V, -•> hM' -'7 \ , :1^11% -i mMir MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION nKfcTinu ur uuux xu,— ^ ^ ROTH (CONT)Mabusth noted that there already was an existing garage there. Goetten noted that her direction at that time in 19^ was to keep the garage on the house side of the street. McDonald noted that the wetlands are very fragile to build by and asked Mr. Fisk i f Mr . Roth would consider putting the the garage on the house side. Mr. Fisk noted that Mr. Roth wanted it on the other side and that thet e probably wasn* t enough room on the house side of the street. Goetten noted that Mr. Roth was going by the direction of the majority opinion of the Planning Commission but it was not one she shared in. She noted that she still has the same concern that she did in 1982. McDonald would - ike to ask Mr. Roth if he would put it on the house side. Callahan asked if they moved the garage on the main structure side, would they need a variance? Mabusth stated that they would because of the 30' setback requirement. Callahan asked if the hardcover situation would be better if the hardcover in question is over where the house is and if it is closer to the wetlands as it now is. Mabusth stated that it probably would be Sime noted that there is an existing structure there now approximately the size proposed now, and it would seem that they have not changes anything that is existing by approving his request in this location, that he is just replacing one garage with another and that it would remove an eyesore. Mabusth noted that the proposed garage is a little larger than the existing one. Adams stated that since the applicant has complied with the original recommendation of the Planning Commission and that they should approve it, but to allow a little more flexibility by maybe moving the qarage a few feet back. But that he would also invite the applicant to consider building a garage on the house side. He stated that this way the Planning Commission would be giving the applicant the flexibility to go ahead and do what the Planning Commission stated at an earlier time. ■ i f. ■■ ■ Itei MINUTES ROTH (CO *• Mas an existing that time in 1982 de of the street. ‘ very fragile to :h would consider e side. on the other side room on the house by the direction ng Commission but ed that she still in 1982. he would put it on srage on the main variance? cause of the 30' tuation would be is over where the etlands as ifnow ould be. structure there -iow, and it would nything that is n this location, with another and arage is a little :ant has complied of the Planning pprove it, but to ' maybe moving the would also invite g a garage on the way the Planning e applicant the ^hat the Planning time. W ... >1 ^ - j.'4i % lisp mm. iii MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 18, 1983. page 6 ROTH (CONT) offering all of these alternative actions to the i^g^ r:i^ n:t‘=‘’ha^%^ - r t^^'hTe ^ti;: application. McDonald asked Mr. Fisk how extensive the was, if the garage was going to be heated, and if the garage would have plumbing? Mr. Fisk stated that there would be no heat and no plumbing and no room for a hobby shop. following findings and hardships: 1. No additional land available. 2. Depth of dry area within lots 17 and 18 is minimi. 3. Setback of proposed garage 10*-20', giving the owner the option of building right on the road as proposed or setting garage back. This approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Owner must obtain a demolition permit for removal of existing garage and must remove garage. 2. All roof drainage to be directed away from lake towards Baldur Park Road. 3. Building Official will determine if soil borings are necessary for a floating slab. 4.Owner is placed on notice that the City will not approve future improvements to this property if they require variances. 5.Owner is offered the option of destroying the existing garage and building on the same side of the house, (building on either side) 6. If he chooses to set the garage back farther than the other garages in the neighborhood then he has to take away the gravel on the other side. Sime seconded. \ Goetten felt it was important that in Adams motion that if the garage was not placed on the house side of the street that the gravel be removed to decrease the hardcover on the house side. -.-i mm" 5 U’V. MSi mmm MINUTES OF * ROTH (CONT) 3. Page 6 igested was a good ion make a motion /e actions to the )ice, and then the lave to table the ive the hobby shop heated, and if the be no heat and no shop. shore and street increase of 148 sf 18 based on the ) • \. 17 and 18 is minimi. -20', giving the ht on the road as Llowing conditions: 1 permit for removal remove garage. :ted away from lake mine if soil borings g slab. he City will not this property if m of destroying the on the same side of er side) e back farther than iborhood then he has he other side. n Adams motion that e house side of the •d to decrease the 4-: 1^ i/--y 3,® .i o':’» MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION .. . . . - - ^ - ROTH (CONT)iriAns stated that he would still suppor t the motion but tharirwasn-this desire to add that. Adams noted his that It aKrtiit it* 1 - He doesn*t want to maketwo concocns bdouc ic* x i • a . o ^^ei^!led4hr/thl^^^^:n1n^^CoUrssfo^n^h:d^4l•s^ r^unrirreVstf '^^e^%'je"d^ t?:4t^?^ ate^was so close to the water table anyway that a large ITt of the rain that ^”so"l°ts^o'ne of the plttF of the lake that he personally doesn't have a lot of concern about that. Goetten noted that the Baldur Park area Is highly sensitive area and that whatever you can do to out down on hardcover is important. Adams amended his motion adding condition »6 that a hatSlovet tradeoff be established using the gravel on the north side of the road. Sime seconded. Adams stated that if the applicant mooses to "<ove the garage towards the marsh, then he would have 5 - i® additional driveway, then the gravel has t'J OO; Ht; hrt rpad - offering applicant the possibility or construction on other side of road meeting all the same conditions. vote: Ayes (2), Nays (3). Motion Failed. McDonald, Callahan, and Goetten majority opinions. Jr;,".’." s;; secondly It had less Impact thermalnthirdly theres enough area on the lot with the m house to accommodate the garage. No reason to put a garage on the other side of the street without pertinent structure. Callahan moved to table Roth-s '’PPi'*"^1 ^^so Roth can meet with the Planning Commission and also until the Planning Commission members that members in 1982 to voice their views. Callahan withdrew the motion to table and move to deny it. Callahan moved to table Roth's application until the next Planning Commission meeting. V 4- * I ^ • 4 i i V 'AH ^OTH (CONT) #750 WAGENBR PETITION FOR STREET VACATI jpport the motion but at. Adams noted his loesn't want to make 5 applicant. 2 -He 3sion had discussion Park area and he felt Lzeable marsh area in 3 filtering agent for , He noted that this e anyway that a large tr its grass or gravel there. So its one of onally doesn't have a Park area is highly you can do to cut down condition 16 that a. d using the gravel on it chooses to move the would have 5 — 10* of ivelhastogo. Point : the possibility of d meeting all the same >tion Failed. an majority opinions. ive a chance to clean up e advantage of that, n Lake Minnetonka and the lot with the main e. F) reason to put a the street without a application until Mr. ig Commission and also n members that were r views. o table and move to deny s application until the t ing. ■ . ■ % % 11 - il i: 9- i V ^ROTH (CONT) #750 WAGBNER & DETTLOFF PETITION FOR CHARLES STREET VACATION McDonald seconded. Vote: Ayes (2), Nays (3). Motion failed. Goetten moved to approve 2 stall garage, 22' x 24', single story for Guenther Roth, and to approve a street setback variance and a hardcover increase of 148 sf within the 75-250' setback areas with a 10' setback and doors facing the street based on the following findings and hardships: 1. No additional dry contiguous land available. 2. Setback of proposed garage consistent with setbacks of existing garages on Baldur Park Road. This approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Detached garage to be placed on Lot 8. 2. Owner must obtain a demolition permit for removal of existing garage on Lots 17 and 13. 3. All roof drainage to be directed away from lake towards Baldur Park R^>ad. 4. Building Official will determine if soil borings are necessary for a floating slab. 5.Owner is placed on notice that the City will not approve future improvements to this property if they require variances. 6. Applicant must tear down existing garage prior to issuance of building permit. Adams seconded. Vote: Ayes (4), Nays (0). Callahan abstained. Ross Thorfinson was present. Mabusth noted that the City was in receipt of Woodhill's response that completely supports the vacation petition, which was requested by Planning Commission at their June 20, 1983, meeting. Callahan moved to approve the vacation of an unused portion of Charles Street as described in the plat of Orono Orchards and as described in applicants* vacation petition based on the following findings: 1. 33* wide right of way does not meet current standards for City road. (2), Nays (3). rage, 22' x 24' , I approve a street crease of 148 sf a Ifl' setback and \ the following md available. consistent with Jaldur Park Road • wing conditions: 1 Lo t 8. irtnit for removal ind 13. d away from lake i if soil boring3 Lab. he City will not this property if 3 garage prior to 4ays (0) . :h noted that the 3 response that ition, which was : their June 20, ion of an unused ed in the plat of in applicants' lowing findings: >t meet current PLANNING COMMISSION - CITY OF ORONO I8I9S3 Re: Action Item 11 - variance for Milto.. ^ From: Duane N. Hall, I860 Shady Wood, Orono '(in I object to an extension of the time granted Mr. Seifert for removing the out-building which stands near the shore of Lake ilinnetonka. I object in general and for specific reasons. support the city’s efforts to remove structures built too close frnm roadways. I’m convinced the 75 foot set-back rom the lake is acceptable to Orono residents otherwise it would have been repealed years ago. More specifically, having lived next to an overcrowded lot a 60 foot lot with four residential buildings, I can tell you it does cause problems. In this situation one can expect annual damage to adjacent property. For example, my fence is damaged annually by ars sliding off Mr. Seifert’s driveway in winter. You can LpLt four, sometimes more cars, parked in front. Since this type of Seifert’s snowplower dumps Th- ^ often burying my mailbox*^ blockrtr hazardess since snow piled this highblocks the view of oncoming traffic. Do not misunderstand me. I do not blame Mr. Seifert- in fact for ' s"ife?ra^5'b" events/'iradduLon'!^. Seifert and his family have been good neighbors and I sincerely hope we can remain good neighbors. stating during a Council meeting in 1980 that he would remove all three out-buildings immcdiately^if Counci"felt I recall thecouncil felt that would not be necessary and proposed a phased "nc'L’’ r„ ’''r. Seifert had' ec'lic varla^c^fo ® ’’i®" ond the City granted the his oart of iJ°r' ■'''■• Seifert has securedof rL ^ agreement I feel he should honor the City's partOf the agreement. ^ ^ know that Mr. Seifert's attorney called me woul/mean^t'rJ^i?!- “ and mostly, preferring to avoid causing the neighbors^any additional problems connected with the overcroweded lot. ■ ■k ww MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 18, 1983 Page 18 uml1 (1 JIL 1 81983 I: j iLky CITY OF ORONO ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: D. A. Taylor, 1880 Shadywood, Wayzata, MN RE: Mr. Seifert's Variance Request JULY 17,1983 I live two doors from the Seiferts and would like the Council to know I will not go along with Mr. Seifert's request for an extension of time to remove the small house near the lake. I would have appeared in person to voice my feelings but poor health prevents me from doing so. I went along with his request for a variance in 1980 because I thought the issue was only a matter of hard-cover. I was led to believe at that tim** that removing the small house was not an issue, that Mr. Seifert planned to remove the lakeshore house. Also, I recall a tax problem. Mrs. Seifert had sold a house and it was necessary to put some $40,000 of capital gains into a new home or else pay taxes on the amount. I feel Mr. and Mrs. Seifert should perform on their part of the agreement with the City and object to an extension. I would have objected in 1980 if I had realized there was a possibility that the small house by the lake would not be removed within a few years. I have talked with Glenn Tillotson, 1875 Shadywood; he feels as I do and objects to an extension of time to remove the house. Frankly, we both feel that Mr. Seifert made an agreement with the City and should keep his part of the agreement. Respectfully, D. A. Taylor I fm mm ♦vi m-C- if :/ m sNv- of / C Page 18 81963 [Mip ! «__P : ORONO il to lor >e I .ed to an ise. >e and a new E the Ld have that Eew els as I ith the ii >4 •T’' ■ r t r^. nil 'Ssy EXHIBIT C«^rtiTicato oi* 3ur*/oy for Gu'Jnthor Rcth of Lotn 17 an.\ I'v, ^lock P, Paldur Par!-: ’.lennepin County, KinnesoU ^ i«0 ^'WU va SZ^ S/io^^/inc fZ%V as of 6-/9-9Z [j©[iOW[l JU.-6B8e CITY OF ORONO TX hor r«rt i;; V .svn'ii Cl Mon - 0 rj i. f % ' '' . tW f »Gr. 11 *, . .»« 1 ^ . k ••)! i i. l 'V:S ro ;r.;--;or 0 :.f rc/ir:.:iv?nt.‘. iru-'j '.nu ori' <<" t . :,.--vov OI- Vi^ :>nunua: r:» r.<.2 ;.v- » • 'vjr ovv:;.i;.*wF. or Srao: L" ^ : 0-17--2 O • 1 ' /fcGl* *'lr> r« «•'*»* ' -••• I' AC^'AiTw- L-Coffin Lfir.d iurvj/or 'ir.a Pl:*.nn«r Ifinn.-sotu *o it,."'’!;., ^ > • . : \ ■' ' ■■'. ’■ 4 »-.i - \ klr-V V'-' .•••-• V t- i ■ 1| »:..r . ■ *■ 0 j m mK EXHJc'. J b /./. Q 9 ^ iW * •j * r • '.*» I . % .• • • i ' . ^ • •« • • V. ’ - 4 • .. ! • I . ? • • . . 4 .•. • , 3r'-..lc; jL.t'! : 1” = :<• 0-r-.-77 . • ••.T.-"• •• . ♦» WV^ • • ' mj » .• ak* a • * • • % • Mil ,f ^ 327 •• • ; •v..«i. • ^ -fc - • - •• • • ^ • L^ f • > - ^ m • V . • • * • • * - j i. * * • • • •• v< it *. • « • • • •••«.« i «» ✓ Y f - >« • ^ w 4 '■■*' V * ■' ?■• ii.;- V ;>'< m> ■H $' •, iv- Ul.2 • ■ ■ -'.s a; »'1l^’i' V ’‘• ■*:, -V Xl • * ' :• J ^■V %^rr;h EXKiBST £.ff. «J} o yy jr i •* I •‘'•.I* • *; i- ^ f •*‘' .• • • ..|*« •• im I. A,.*# ./>L o, _r.o* : :., ;. ...,v I. ■ .■ •• .':. Cr , ,‘.*: r. ••.< *••. . ..• :3 . <v. /> Aw4»^e«^ fie ^0*M*V C-rv:- I0 c;* :;u:'\ey; I ;;vrciy -v:*ii;;. : •» .1* thif ic :: trur* i» i "«: r ;ct ror ro I ^ of •* • •■ , .ft . /* ^ • • Sa •*.••:! -' 1, « * • • ft %-'.c ^r. ii. L, l: 0-. ..C- i. i;.-.\ :x.r w . •* r.'jC-’., ri:.«.T i'ir.j'OVv. or 4-*.crc:.c*;.; :.T.*u:. • « M *• • ;jOj\ic»r. K. Yorfir Tu. ■••’•- ■'.u:''*-•.■•• cr /l^rn.-r l.»or.r .’ l:.r.«':5Ct'j 60-.-4 • I ft 3r JC: . ofQ i ’,X..//'\C. 6O..4 * •* r* • •*« • • A I . 4 EXH5BH ' * -I Ofj - .<r^ I .> ’ • ■ • -• 4* r* • • ••••», •it - 4 ^ I . • .f.c : • • • ^ I. % r • • ••• ... -A* . 5 : r 4 . r * FROM; DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Jeanne A. Mabusth August 8, 1983 #760 William Ulrich, 1535 Bohns Point Road Conditional Use Permit Application - Conditional Use Permit For Seawall At your July 18, 1983 meeting. Planning Commission asked for additional information on the following: Additional Information From DNR Mr. Stine has submitted a follow up letter dated July 21, 1983, and then another follow up memo dated to clarify his statement "other methods of controlling these problems." Very briefly to review - Seawall is only method known to successfully combat muskrat investation - rip rap is ineffective. His site inspection confirmed "muskrat problems combined with poor soil types". It should be noted for the public record that the DNR issued a permit to Ulrich prior to the City's action on the application; in fact prior to the Planning Commission meeting of July 18, 1983. Drainage Concern The City Engineer and I inspected the drainage area in order to determine if the seawall would have any impact on the drainage basin located between the Ulrich and Blohorn properties. The seawall will have no effect on the watershed finding adequate grassed area within the basin to contain surface runoff. Notices to Neighbors Blohorn’s property, given the location of the lagoon in relation to abutting properties, is the only effected property owner. Blohorn has consented to a 20' extension of the seawall along the north property line of his portion of the lagoon. There is 200'+ of shoreline that separates Louis E. Navin's shoreline from the lagoon area; this is the property owner to the immediate north of the Ulrich property. Please note Louis E. Navin received notice of the Ulrich application. r : WMimm % "■> • v'l mV. m 1535 1 Condii Page 1 Eniin< Pleas< only i by an reque; if api that 1 regis Staff To ap] insta! and 21 condi' 1 - 1 2 - ] 3 - ] 4 - d - asked for ly 21, 1983, , in order of controlling s only method rip rap is t problems )NR issued le application; July 18, a in order to the drainage rties. The ng adequate unof f. »n in relation ty owner, iwall along »n. There k’s shoreline > the immediate Navin received If » w U' ■■ i 7^-'5 ^ i . I" - I Ms 1535 Bohns Point Rd Conditional Use Permit Page 2 Engineer's Report Please review the engineer's report dated August 5, 1983. His only condition for approval is that the plans must be signed ^ by an engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. This request need not hold up any action by the Planning Commission - if approved by Planning Commission your recommendation would ask that work could not begin until the plans are signed by a registered engineer. Staff Recommendation To approve a conditional use permit for William Ulrich for the installation of a seawall along the lagoon area of his property and 20* of Gerard Blohorn's property subject to the following conditions: 1 -Need to face seawall with natural stone rip rap - Planning Commission may recommend against this condition as this is based on overall visual effect of seawall on mainlake and lagoon is in a secluded, protected area. 2 -Proposed pathway along edge of seawall must be pervious to water and made of a natural material. 3 -Prior to applicant obtaining a building permit for seawall construction, he must submit plans signed by a licensed registered engineer. 4 -Applicant must obtain a permit from the M.C.W.D. for installation of seawall. N I t:.- Mi, 2335 hU. . St. fimmt, PUtttm: 512^536 “* MHWuu /‘300 August City 01 Box 66 Crysta; Attn: 1 Re: Fi Wi Dear J We hav' Bohns ! Minneti lake b' The pi. City r Mlnnes Yours • BONEST Glenn GRC:11 6256b 3. His ligned his imission - would ask a for the property .lowing ;t U rvious by :or ■n m I m 1 f ■y\ V . % Ro4MH0, S ^440C4ai€i, 9mc* Q^0U*»UiMa W 2335 %U. 7«—A S6 Si. P*JL. 55ff3 /9w 6f2‘636-4600 MKWyu t-300-622-6573 Otto 0. Bonestroo, P,E. Robert H'. Rosene, P.E. Joseph C. Anderhk» P,E. Bradford A. Lemberf, P.E. Richard E, Turner, P.E, James C. Olson, P.E. August 5» 1983 Gleiui H. Cook. P.E. Eetth A. Gordon, P.E, Thomos E. Noyes, P.E. Richard W. Foster, P.E. Robert G. Schunicht, P.E. Marein L. Sorvata, P.E. Donald C. Burgardt, P.E. Jerry A. Pourdon, P.E. Mark A. Hanson, P.E. Ted K. Field, P.E. Michael T. Rautmann, P.E. Robert R. Pfefferk, P.E. Charles A. Erickson Leo M. Pawebky Harlan M. Olson City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Hn« 53323 Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Re: File No. 139-760 William Ulrich Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the proposed seawall on the William Ulrich property at 1535 Bohns Point Road. The proposal would not have any adverse effect on Lake Minnetonka with the exception of a visual Impact. The wall will Improve the lake by preventing further erosion of the shoreline. The plans presented are adequate in concept but we would recommend that the City require the plans be signed by an engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC Glenn R. Cook GRC:11 6256b m 'tS Mmi-V' , .i V- .'.p-: iEBii DNR INFORMATIO (612) 296-6157 July IE Mr. Wil 1535 Be Orono, Dear Mr PERMIT Enclose Please County Permit begin t posted Please ^ w Cknn R, Cook, P.E. A'ftrA A. Gordoo, P.E THomos C. No>fS. P.E Rkhord W. Fosttr, P.E Robert G. Sckyntcht, P.E. Morvim L. Sonmh, P.E. Doootd C. Byrgordt, P.E. Jerry A. .loyrdoo, P.E. Mork A. Mohsoh, P.E. TedK. Field, P.E. Michoel T. Roytmonn, P.E Robert R. Pfgf/erk, P.E. Chortes A. Erkkson Leo M. Pawebky Horten M. Olson rty at 1535 on Lake Improve the d that the State of 3 IA I t OP DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Vi BOX 32 . CENTENNIAL OFFICE BUILDING • ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA • 55155 ONR INFORMATION (612) 296-6157 FILE NO. July 15. 1983 Mr. William Ulrich 1535 Bohn's Point Road Orono, Minnesota 55391 Dear Mr. Ulrich: PERMIT APPLICATION 83-6150, CONSTRUCTION OF RETAINING WALL Enclosed is your permit to construct a retaining wall on Lake Minnetonka. Please note that this permit must be title registered in the office of the County Recorder. Upon receipt of such recordation from you, a Notice of Permit card will be forviarded to you. You do not have authorization to begin this v/ork until you have received such Notice of Permit card and posted same at the project site. Please sent the certification of recordation to the following address: Department of Natural Resources Metro Region Division of Waters 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55106 V •• • If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact Mr. John Stine (296-7523) for assistance. Sincerely, IVISvION OF WATERS <^mes F. Cooper, Admij^^trirtor rater Development S^tion JFC/JLS:ch Peter Bachmann, BHH & G Mary Marx, U.S.C.E. Hennepin County SWCD Minnehaha Creek WSD LMCD City of Orono Curt Nelson, C.O. St. Paul Waters Lake Minnetonka file Enclosure AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER m ,.rr mm -whML ONR INFORMATI (612) 296-6157 July ] Mr. Wi 1535 E Orono, Dear P PERMIT Enclos Please County Permit begin posted Pleas If you Stine jfc/jl: Pi Mr Hi M LI J--C Cl SI L< Enclosi URGES TA • 55155 FILE NO. Minnetonka, ffice of the Notice of zation to card and address: t Mr. John DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES BOX 32 . CENTENNIAL OFFICE BUILDING • ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA • 55155 DNR INFORMATION (612) 296-6157 FILE NO July 15, 1983 Mr. William Ulrich 1535 Bohn's Point Road Orono, Minnesota 55391 Dear Mr. Ulrich: PERMIT APPLICATION 83-6150, CONSTRUCTION OF RETAINING WALL Enclosed is your permit to construct a retaining wall on Lake Minnetonka. Please note-.that this permit must be title registered in the office of the County Recorder. Upon receipt of such recordation from you, a Notice of Permit card will be forwarded to you. You do not have authorization to begin this work until you have received such Notice of Permit card and posted same at the project site. Please sent the certification of recordation to the following address: Department of Natural Resources Metro Region Division of Waters 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55106 • • •% •• •♦ • If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact Mr. John Stine (296-7523) for assistance. Sincerely, li^ON OF water ; A^fnes F. Cooper, Admuyistrilxor later Development S^tion JFC/JLS:ch Peter Bachmann, BHH & G Mary Marx, U.S.C.E. Hennepin County SWCD Minnehaha Creek WSD LMCD ^^ City of Orono Curt Nelson, C.O. St. Paul Waters Lake Minnetonka file Enclosure AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER r I ■k-; m \i * I ki Ms Ci P.t Cr En No ta I Co ta nu I At sm ac 83 ot th Si i Jc Me JI Er tCES • 55155 FILE NO netonka. ce of the tice of ion to d and dress: r. John M Ldepartment of natural resources * 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55106 PHONEt 29S-1S22 ------ July 21, 1983 •1 ' { Ms. Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 RE: WILLIAM ULRICH RETAINING WALL-DNR PA 83-6150 ^ 11 ]u ,j—II--•»»* ♦ • « V. V . • JUL 22603 CITYOFQRQNO Dear Ms. Mabusth: Enclosed is a copy of the Department of Natural Resources' Permit No. 83-6150 which has been issued to Mr. William Ulrich for a re­ taining wail on Lake Minnetonka. I have reviewed the notice of the City of Orono's Notice of Planning Commission Action on the conditional use permit for Mr. Ulrich's re­ taining wall. This letter is in response to the special condition number two (#2) of that notice which requests a report from the DNR. I made a field investigation of Mr. Ulrich's property on May 10, 1983 At that time, I noted evidence of shoreline erosion problems in the small lagoon. The erosion is, in ray opinion, a combination of muskrat activity combined with poor soil types. Thu DUR's issuance of Permit 83-6150 is based on the minimal impact of the proposed wall. Also, other alterantives (such as riprap) would not provide greater protection than the proposed wall. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Johh Line Stine, Area Hydrologist MeUfro Region Division of Waters JLS/ch Enclosure cc: William Ulrich Peter Bachmann, BHH & G AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Be^/. 11/70 tCES 523__ 122083 ilti' ermit a re­ planning .ch*s re- idition the DNR. r 10, 1983. ! in the of muskrat of Permit , Also, $r protection INTH fora P6R.MI’ Pursui letters, maps IS HEREBY communicat notice from To cons and ing PROPERT'i for the puri This permit 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. This Lav\ law. Thi! XW xw. No dirr Th« Coi Thi cor of Co wr In pe ac Tl ol ar ns ac cl tf Rev. 1 1/70 i I f •V*- ■>w:‘• . •; 5^^. ,• IT* . :{ k‘ i . ■Ln W ''• i /» ; -•r Dl VlblUl>J Ur WMI cno, -------- —- Centennial Office Building, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55101 IN THE MATTER Or THE APPLICATION OF VilLLlAM ULRICH for a PERMIT TO CHANGE THE COURSE. CURRENT. OR CROSS SECTION of Hennepin coumy. TITLE REGISTERED PERMIT Lake ninnetonka (27-113) (Crystal Bay) .0 10s, and on ,h. letters, maps, and plan* ^^Ta*^l*lf rS'suppo , ^^hose address for the purpose of nonces and other ■S HEREBY GRANTED d. Hr. Wimam^»__ Pninr^Id .„n,nhadd,«.i„obi.c..ochang. by rr“'p—“" Orono. tiinnesota bbM To construct 279 feet of aluninum retaining wall, all as indicated in and plans received April 19. 1983. All work shall be in accordance with the follow ing General and Special Provisions. property DESCRIBED as: Govemment Lot 2, Lydiard's Park; SEH, SE^4, Section 8, T117N, R23W ior<h.p».po»o( Shoreline protection and erosion control. This parmh is oranudsobiect lo Iha lollowing GENERAL and SPECIAL PROVISIONS. GENERAL PROVISIONS HENNEPIN county 1. law. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. dim.n..onL^^^^^ ao.bo,ia«. .N».«n.,.i.» .. «i. L3SUar of Naloral Re«>oroe. lor inwaotion ,„y ,i„, b, daam. it n«:eat..y lor th. It^moort’..’^ 'r,ra»:Tr in ,b. IntaraR ol pobUc baallh and vHlara. or lor .iolation ol an, .1 th. prtnripon. of this permit, unless Otherwise provided in the Special Provisions. SPECIAL PROVISIONS I. The excavation ol«.» au.hori,«l harain ahall not b. conWnrNl to inclvd. th. ramovat ol orjani. nral.er,--------------DDES- MDT APPI Y_________________ unless the area f I November 30. 1983 . Upon NOT ,7n«.«J it imp»vK,o, or is s,al«l by th. application ol banlonit. altar axcavalioo. unless the area from which such organic matter is iCmOVl?U •» lllipci w -----— r in an can. whar. ,h. doin, hy th. parnStta. o. ''Sl^dtaVTar “L’^’dCrh.'r.nh.Train".."r.rrHrora.l per,onh Ulc »n.Ho,i.ia, concar„.d. and thH. acquire all* property, rights and interests necessary thereforacquire all property, ngnis ana ----------- Thit pern.it it parmi,tivaonly.Noliabilitv$hall!»^Wsrtu^ornicorrrtbythaStaleolMin^taoray^^^ eii': v;,sron“ri\h7v=;/ not be construed as estopping or ® j* : , icsoltinq from any such act or omission, or as estopping or limiting any legal &r'»' —»' the provisions of the permit or applicable provisions of law. ^ ___..II •«! zAfaM r any NO matarla, axcavatad portion of the bed of said v'<<4JI V411 JI IIJ IIT^‘T ---------- - ■ - — ---------y --------------- - ' _____It shall be the duty ol the permittee to tletermine correctly a» pertinent elevations at the site of the work for the purpose ol implying with the conditions ol th.s permit. ♦ « « • - at the site of ths viorK ror me purpu’>»? Aoy cension ol ,h.ol Hid v,al.r. raHll.np Iron. .■«..■< aulhorircl by .hi. pvm.il shall b«on.. p..hli^.»R^Han^^ mm. V L f!:a,. J.'Ti : *V W:erm V . * XII. XIII. XIV. XV, XVI. The p of th local from Paul, XVII. After Water suppi Spoil poss: f loo- area para mini Futu here shal r.ate pro? pric pays $25. Pari reci to ! Per all Per of 90 Ad€ be thi th« A1 of gr pr in fo Pc tc ipKBMHI :# (27-113) It'd in the pefmit appiicalion. »f by lefwence, PERMtSSION t purpose of notices and other iibject to change by written in the application nee with the follow ion 8, HENNEPIN COUNTY I by Minnesota Statutes. Federal ins now or hereafter imposed by JWKX'X HW)?XX tural Resources, in the hydraulic lorized representatives of the ne he deems It necessary for the riolation of any of the provisions 30, 1983 e may be obtained. noES_ . Upon from which juch organic matter is fusing.ordamagingof any property i thereon or interests therein, the r authorities concerned, and shall yofitsofficen.agentsorernplovees,. person or property resulting frorn natter hereunder. This permit shaH the state against the permittee, its ir as estopping or limiting any legal lalion of or fa»lure to comply with fte<l herein, shall l)e placed on any ne correctly .ill pertinent elevations tep»ihl*c waters and left open atMl u it • mm XII. XIII. XIV. XV. XVI. XVII. ?;PECIAL PROVISIOMS {only the numbeted Special Provisions apply to this petnit) 1 .-t-K ill rules, regulations, requirenents, or standards The pernittee shall comply other applicable federal, state, or of the Minnesota Pollution Co 9 oHviate tiny requirement for federal assent local agencies. This permit does n office & Custom House, St. from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1135 U.S. P2i\jXf Minri6SOt«i 55X01# After completion of the the permittee shall fupriythe“egirnarwat:rsi office ^ith photographs of the project area. spoil material shall not be placed on ^f^btn'areas^ubjef/t^^ possible, such material s ou no within flood plain areas because wooding, in the event sporl "^ble, the spoil should be placed areas free from flooding ate not ^ g „ver a large area so as to Sl:e rros"hi:rstrLtL to the passage of flood waters. Future maintenance excavation, permittee herein authorized. Prior ^g^goujees in writing of the volume of shall advise the Department ° removal, and the spoil disposal site{s) material to be tc'oved, the manner ^ inspection is necessary proposed. If the work, the permittee shall submit a Chech prior to approving such maintenan actual cost of the inspection, or payable to the State Treasurer to Regulations 6 HCAS S 1.5000, SlLoO, whichever is greater, commenced until permittee's receipt'’of°;hc"De;artrert'rapproval. This approval will include a permit card to be posted at the site. permittee shall ensure that the contractor has received and thoroughly understands " all conditions of this permit. - ^r"thir;e::trcorstitrte“rmi:re7eafor:"^^ 90 days in jail. w 1 /livnc filter fences, sediment ponds) shall Adequate erosion control ^ ® authorized work and shall be mainbein- - be installed prior «d and stabilized as indicat.-'. • throughout project until site has been restur the following Special Provision. All exposed soil resulting from perennial^'and Innual - of completion of "°'f/.,^%traw or similar mulch. The use of sod as erosion grasses and then "-ulched mulching provided the sod is protection will preclude th „-iod and is staked on slopes steeper than ^rurrt ^o^ik^nri rtrnce^t ^e;«y one foot of vertical rise. permittee shall notify the Regional ,ators' personnel ,206-7523, « hours prior to intent to commence authorized wor*. I- » mm:w"' 3 '■V •'m Planning Coininission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator August 9, 1983 List of Exhibits Exhibit A-- Resolution #886 Pvhibit B - Notice to Applicant Lhibit C - information packet ’ Pavement Exhibit D - MCWD letter - July 29, 1983 Exhibit E - Cook letter - August 5, 1983 I have heard nothing ^^e applicant's planner or^^^^ alternate methods of dealing with the excessive narur discharge of additional runoff. I have enclosed information on “porous pave^nt^^ type of pavement "f ‘=°?hftpplioanf expressed concern with grass we briefly touched on its use. PP caught within the cutting maintenance and ladies high nortions of a less used sectionlarae openings. Staff would suggest that portions or a of parking lot could be paved with these porous blocks. The MCWD and City staff want more detail on the outlet structure for the retention pond. Planning Commission should ask the applicant to consider the foil g improvements in dealing with the hardcover issue: 1. 2. 3. Porous pavement for sections of parking lot Design pond to better deal with ground percolation Design outlet structure to slow discharge of runoff from originally proposed allowable discharge rate of 9.3 cubic feet. V , » •f. .' ;r r li -■7 t ..N' va;.- a r t-M’ mm #764 - August Page i Sugge s to ap£ of Ca] sanett the pi This c nwoody Avenue on Item gineer concerning er at this maximum y were to get xcesses of hardcover He, too, is concerned the applicant to rate or slow the our review. This our last meetxng, I concern with grass it within the i less used section »t structure for the Lder the following off from originally eet. #764 - Calvary Memorial Church August 9, 1983 Page 2 Suggested recommendation: to approve the conditional use permit and hardcover variance application of Calvary Memorial Church to permit the construction of an 81' X 104' sanctuary and the expansion of a parking lot based on the finding that the proposal is consistent with guidelines setforth in Resolution #886. This approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant to work with staff to reduce hardcover variance of 28% • • 2. Applicant must obtain a permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for retention pond 3. Applicant to submit revised landscape plan and planting schedule 4. All proposed improvements to the site shall remain for the sole use of the church and/or school functions as allowed by the Orono Zoning Code Section 34.021 and 34.022. ;v% -i ance application an 81' X 104' e finding that esolution #886. iance of 28% eek Watershed ing schedule or the sole use the Orono Zoning mmmm ty. m :■ -::/v .Ml f" ■: ■■■■.> h‘y.■■:■■'■ mm .'■-V ' •■. je:: D RESOLUTION NO. 886 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted zoning regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a Conditional Use Permit by Calvary Memorial Church for transfer of ownership and use of the Elizabeth Gardner School building at 2420 Dunwoody Avenue from Independent School District 277 to Calvary Memorial Church; and WHEREAS, Calvary Memorial Church has stated intentions of using the building for church services and related functions and for parochial school classes and related functions; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono Zoning Code, Sections 34.530, 34.020, 34.021 and 34.022 specifically authorize such church and school use by Conditional Use Permit in residential zoning districts: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, hereby approves a Conditional Use Permit for Calvary Memorial Church subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. The land and building shall be used for church and/or school functions as allowed by the Orono Zoning Code Sections 34.021 and 34.022. Sufficient space shall be provided for off-street parking of all vehicles at all times with no on-street parking allowed for any reason. Future building expansion plans shall be subject to review and City Council approval and amendment of this Conditional Use Permit, and such future expansion may be limited in scope due to insufficient lot area or off-street parking availability. The City Council reserves the right to review and amend this Conditional Use Permit upon due cause, including receipt of complaints from nearby neighbors. C r e s i d o w ATTES KL CHURCH rporation B of Minnesota; and lo has adopted safe development application for :h for transfer 3ol building at rict 277 to Intentions ated functions tiions; and Lons 34.530, such church Bntial zoning f Council of ^nditional Use following h and/or ng Code reet parking t parking allowed ect to review is Conditional limited in eet parking and amend ncluding Calvary Memorial Church shall review and approve of this resolution, which approval shall be indicated by the endorsement of an authorized representative hereon, and shall cause an original copy of this resolution to be filed in the chain of title of the property within thirty (30) days of the approval of this resolution by the City Council, or of the closing date of the church purchase of the property, which ever is later. AGREED: Calvary MemoriaLtchurch , Dated this day of March . 19 78 . Walter B. Massengale, Acting Mayor ATTEST: Walter R. Keifson, Clerk/Administrator •tijiiiii^ninfir stat; COUN* ci*n Admi here by t appr file Ml. >f this :he i, and > be filed :y (30) :y Council» :he property. f U Acting Mayor v. - iV M w t< : .» Pi ('j'- N • STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO The undersigned duly qualified and acting City Cleric/ Administrator of the City of Orono hereby certifies that attached hereto is a true and correct copy of the original Resolution passed by the City Council of the City of Orono on March 16 . 19 78 approving the CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT on file in the office of the City Clerk/Administrator, City of Orono. ter^lL^enson, Cl erk/Adminis trator Dated this day of March > (Seal) ‘^ •Tg vnf•'in 's’m ‘Vmv4 r. >1 f v« w^xtreme ur r^in the pai ated serious sures on urbai Specifically developing a pacted becau factors: (1) Th made imperv ization, and (2 storm sewers. “Traditiona stormwater n has been to di quickly,” said of the Storm a Program of th< Protection Ag< is usually con^ ers. draining from areas pr natural vegeta Stormwater I This methoc agement incr peak velocitie between preci and degrades creases in pea ative impacts ' stream-bed an downstream stream-bed an associated dov tion and increa intensity of d< The decrease less ground v decreased Ion channels,” he Many com acted legislati opers to reduc dated with Ian stormwater m. emphasized q stormwater. B of innovative ; menl are to me levels by pro' runoff velocity 43 RURAL A^£) u • / y Clerk/ t attached ution passed , 19 78 ERMIT on y of Orono. Porous pavements and urban hydro!•I*y W7xlrcme urbanization in the U.S. JQin the past 30 years has cre­ ated serious environmental pres­ sures on urban land development. Specifically, the hydrology of a developing area is severly im­ pacted because of two principal factors: (1) The percentage of area made impervious through urban ­ ization, and (2) the land served by storm sewers. “Traditionally, the goal of a stormwater management system has been to dispose of stormwater quickly,” said Richard Field, chief of the Storm and Combined Sewer Program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). “Runoff is usually conveyed to storm sew­ ers, draining more rapidly than from areas previously covered by natural vegetation.” Stormwater Management This method of stormwater man ­ agement increases peak runoff, peak velocities, reduces lag time between precipitation and runoff, and degrades water quality. In­ creases in peak flow can have neg­ ative impacts downstream auch as stream-bed and bank erosion with downstream sedimentation, stream-bed and bank erosion with associated downstream sedimenta ­ tion and increases in frequency and intensity of downstream flooding. The decrease in lag time results in less ground water recharge and decreased low flows in stream channels,” he said. Many communities have en­ acted legislation directing devel ­ opers to reduce excess runoff asso­ ciated with land development. Past stormwater management methods emphasized quicx elimination of stormwater. By contrast, the goals of Innovative stormwater manage­ ment are to maintain natural runoff levels by providing for filtration, runoff velocity, extending lag time 43 RURAL AND urban ROADS/JULY. 1963 and reducing runoff volume. Porous pavements have poten ­ tial as a technology for maintaining predevelopment runoff levels by allowing infiltration and ground- water recharge. By acting as an attenuation and runoff reduction device, these pavements can de- New urban land pressures put a squeeze on roads and drainage. crease the volume and peak flow rate and increase lag time. Porous asphalt pavements have been used in highway and airport runway construction. This cpen- graded asphalt mix has been re­ ferred to as “plant mix”, “seal coat ”, “open-graded mix”, “gap- graded mix”, “popcorn mix”, or “porous friction course ”. Material consists of an open-graded asphalt mixture with a high percentage of weight of aggregate larger than a No. 4 sieve having a 0.0187 in. aperture. The material is laid to a thickness of 0.75 to 1 in. The resulting pavement has a course surf.'.ce texture and a high void space-ratio. The course surface texture provides pressure relief channels to remove water under exesss pressure between the pave­ ment and vehicle tire. Temporary storage Is minimal because rainfall is diverted in nearby drains. Also, the high void space-ratio provides channels for dissipation of pressure and flow under the tire. Consequently, hydrostatic pres­ sure cannot build up in the film of surface water under a tire and hydroplaning potential is elimi­ nated. The friction coefficient be­ tween tire and pavement is almost equivalent to the coefficient under dry conditions. California, Nevada, New Mexi­ co, Utah and Louisiana highway agencies have been using plant mix seal-coats for 10 years because of their safety aspects. Applications to airport runways was initiated in 1967 at Farnbor- ough, England by the British Royal Air Force, two European airfields and the U.S. Air Force. Since 1947, the California Highway De­ partment open graded base courses under converitional surfac ­ ing to provide rapid drainage in problem areas. The Franklin Institute Research Laboratories, under EPA sponsor ­ ship, investigated porous bases and porous subbases in conjunction with thicker applications of plant mix seal coat. This experiment was to Investigate the potential of deliv­ ering water to the subbase rather than removing it to a stormwater collection system. Also evaluated were a variety of conventional and unconventional materials. The most promising ones were tested to determine their physical and eco ­ nomic feasibility as porous pave ­ ment materials. Of those tested, the open-graded asphalt concrete was selected as the most suitable because of its superior characteris ­ tics, low cost and ability to be laid by conventional paving. Other porous pavement types studied included concrete lattice blocks. Analysis Findings An analysis by the Franklin Insti­ tute found the cost of concrete pavement with storm sewers to be higher than the cost of an equiva ­ lent porous asphalt installation without storm sewer relief. Howev ­ er. installations will have to consid­ er the need for some storm sewer relief, until more field data on 1 yr ^ t I 1 I 5 i ! porous pavi economics arc very “s governed b cost and pr stones and ability of i user will b< nomic eval the Installa Initial p< tions in D< nia proved al and dra installation and Roch( instrumcnl provide gr benefits ar Pavemen Each pc unique an proved by after a Ion a coopera city of fi hopes to proaches residentia ers latitud plex cond is essentiz The ne changes a ent chanc ities is pa porous p< tunatcly, tices hole ments ha from a ru volume) has watc come a c< ers and p To dc’ rous pav contribut abilitv w volume I base. Ch age basir the soil, will impj runoff ar pavemer soil. Sto can be lii nomic lir coefficient under /ada, New Mexi- Duisiana highway ;n using plant mix years because of :ts. > airport runways 1967 at Farnbor* the British Royal European airfields \ir Force. Since nia Highway De> i graded base nverltional surfac* apid drainage in nstitute Research ler ERA sponsor- porous bases and [ in conjunction lications of plant s experiment was potential of deliv- e subbase rather to a stormwater . Also evaluated conventional and materials. The les were tested to physical and eco- as porous pave- Of those tested, asphalt concrete the most suitable >erior characteris- ability to be laid >aving. pavement types concrete lattice gs the Franklin Insti- cost of concrete orm sewers to be :ost of an equiva- ?halt installation ver relief. Howev- ill have to consid- >ome storm sewer e field data on ir j '5, wk 4'-‘ •> r'*t L c>.. V iI I u mm porous pavements Is available. The economics of porous pavements are very “site specific” as they are governed by design difference, the cost and proximity to the supply of stones and gravel and the perme­ ability of the adjacent soil. Each user will be required to do an eco­ nomic evaluation when considering the installation. Initial porous pavement installa­ tions in Delaware and Pennsylva­ nia proved successful on a structur­ al and drainage basis. Subsequent installations in Woodlands, Texas, and Rochester, New York, were instrumented and monitored to provide greater information on the benefits and drawbacks. Pavement Design ^ Each porous pavement design is unique and is evaluated and ap­ proved by regulatory agencies only after a long analysis and review. In a cooperative agreement with the city of Austin, Texas, the EPA hopes to standardize design ap­ proaches for parking areas and residential streets to allow design­ ers latitude for creativity. For corn- plex conditions a thorough analysis is essential. The need to evaluate the runoff changes and water quality constitu­ ent changes from urbanizing activ­ ities is paramount in the design of porous pavement systems. Unfor­ tunately, most engineering prac­ tices hold the view that all pave­ ments have to be ev?’'.iated solely from a runoff quality {" ow rate and volume) viewpoint. Only recently has water quality degradation be­ come a concern for most practition­ ers and public officials. To develop the design of a po­ rous pavement, the design storm, contributing area and soil perme­ ability will determine the storage volume required for the reservoir base. Characteristics of the drain­ age basin including permeability of the soil, topography and climate will impact the volume and rate of runoff and flow through the porous pavement and existing subsurface soil. Storage capacity, however, can be limited by physical and eco­ nomic limitations. If so, relief mea­ sures should be incorporated to prevent negative impacts that could develop—flooding, freezing, septic conditions, etc. The considerations discussed here will result in a design for porous pavements. This design The pavements provided good load- bearing and rapid drainage. the reservoir base course and to stabilize the surface, a two In. layer of 0.5 in. crushed stone aggregate is recommended. Based on previ­ ous experience, this stabilizer course is necessary because vehi­ cles hauling asphalt hot mix across the reservoir course would create ruts that require constant grading to finished grade prior to hot mix application. Open Graded Asphalt Concrete Surface Course: Porous asphalt consists of a wearing course of open-graded asphalt concrete over a base course of uruform sized aggregate. It differs from conven­ tional asphalt concrete in that it contains very little dust or sand; Its void volume typically is around 16 percent as compared with the two to three percent void volume of conventional asphalt concrete. which was adapted from Thelen and Howe is as follows: The Subbase: All soils under roads may become wet but they must drain to maintain bearing strength. Because soils under po­ rous pavement gel wet, they must be water permeable and they must not “heave” from freezing or thaw­ ing, and must not swell or lose their strength when wet. Most soils can meet these requirements if proper drainage is available. The Reservoir Base Course: !n porous pavement, the base con­ sists of large-sized and graded stones, lightly rolled into an open, interlocking structure that not only transmits mechanical loads, but also stores runoff the soil cannot immediately absorb. This water is held in the reservoir formed by voids in the rock matrix until it can percolate into the soil. These voids can be as high as 40 percent of the total volume. The aim of having a reservoir is to store runoff for sev­ eral hours to allow it to percolate into the soil. The Reservoir Top Stabilizing Course: To assist in final grading of m Porous Pavement Research Projects In Rochester, New York, two parking lots were selected to dem­ onstrate the effectiveness of po­ rous pavements to reduce the rate of stormwater runoff and to investi­ gate the long-term structural integ­ rity of such pavements under se­ vere environmental conditions. One of these sites was selected to evaluate the structural integrity and permeability for the porous pavement under conditions of heavy truck traffic. Results of the study indicated: (1) Peak runoff rates were reduced by as much 83 percent. (2) The pavement, subjected to 100 freeze/thaw cycles, showed no ob­ servable structural degradation. Water drained through the pave­ ment without problems during the winter. (3) Through observations and flow monitoring, the structural integrity of porous pavement (in­ stalled where heavy vehicles were parked) was not impaired. (4) Clog­ ging did result from runoff carrying a heavy sediment load and was relieved through cleaning. (5) Cost of constructing a porous pavement parking lot using impermeable membrane and underdrains was slightly higher than a conventional­ ly-paved lot with stormwater inlets RURAL AND URBAN R0A06/JULY. 1983 49 'U 4 4 !?U iF 'f !>■ '‘ v \ ■ and subsurface piping In Austin, Texas, tl jective for this rese demonstrate, evaluat Figure 1. Concrete p Figure 2. Typical se 50 RURAL Arc LR6-> rvoir base course and to the surface, a two in. layer . crushed stone aggregate mended. Based on previ- )erience, this stabilizer s necessary because vehl* ling asphalt hot mix across rvoir course would create t require constant grading cd grade prior to hot mix ion. I Graded Asphalt Concrete Course: Porous asphalt of a wearing course of aded asphalt concrete over course of uniform sized itc. It differs from conven- isphalt concrete in that It s very little dust or sand; its lume typically is around 16 t as compared with the two e percent void volume of tional asphalt concrete. ( Pavement Research ts Rochester, New York, two 3 lots were selected to dem* :e the effectiveness of po- avements to reduce the rate nnwater runoff and to invests le long-term structural integ- such pavements under se- environmental conditions, f these sites was selected to ite the structural integrity >ermeability for the porous nent under conditions of truck traffic. iults of the study indicated: ak runoff rates were reduced much i's 83 percent. (2) The ment, subjected to 100 [/thaw cycles, showed no ob- ble structural degradation, r drained through the pave- without problems during the r. (3) Through observations ►w monitoring, the structural ty of porous pavement (in- where heavy vehicles were 1) was not impaired. (4) Clog- d result from runoff carrying vy sediment load and was [d through cleaning. (5) Cost structing a porous pavement jg lot using impermeable rane and underdrains was higher than a conventional- ed lot with stormwater inlets . A^O URBAN R0AC6/JULY. 1965 ^ "iVI • i! m .y A. f. J-y. VVi and subsurface piping. In Austin, Texas, the overall ob ­ jective for this research was to demonstrate, evaluate and deter­ mine the feasibility of using various porous pavement. The resulting in­ formation will be used to develop design criteria for potential porous pavement construction. The first phase of this project has been completed and published in an EPA research report entitled, ‘‘Phase 1—Design and Operational Criteria.” Phase 11 of this project — Figure 1. Concrete porous pavement. Figure 2. Typical section of porous asphalt paving. 50 RURAL AT4) UFCAN ROADS/XZ.Y. 1903 still onging—compares the runoff and wear quality characteristics of porous asphalt pavement and con ­ crete lattice blocks to other kinds of conventional parking areas. Advantages The primary objective of porous asphalt pavements for this pro ­ gram is to control runoff and asso ciated water quality degradation Important benefits from porous as phalt pavements include: (1) Atten uation of the runoff rate and vol ume; (2) Improved erosion control; (3) Enhancement of water quality in areas where runoff from imper­ vious areas has potential for be­ coming contaminated; (4) A reduc­ tion or abatement in the need for curbs and storm sewer installation or expansion; (5) Maintenance of natural vegetation and drainage patterns; (6) Reduction or elimina ­ tion in the nuisance factor to pedes­ trian and motorist from standing puddles and temporary storage in lots and streets; (7) Increase in the amount of groundwater recharge to local aquifers in water defficient areas; and (8) Improved road safe ­ ty due to a higher friction coeffi­ cient, reduced hydroplaning and improved visibility. Disadvantages The greatest coi.cern using po ­ rous pavement is its susceptibility to clogging. Based on past experi­ ence, this problem should not oc­ cur if proper care and maintenance are taken. Porous pavement effectiveness must be evaluated during the melt­ ing of ice and snow accumulated on its surface or if rain occurs when the subsurface is frozen. The test site in Rochester showed that this was not a problem. Another disadvantage in the use of porous pavement is that some existing building codes are not in­ tended for this new technology. For example, if conventional draining structures (curbs, gutters inlets, etc.) are arbitrarily required in all parking areas, then the construc ­ tion costs of porous pavement in stallation becomes less economi cally attractive. □ jarcs the runoff :haractcristics of vement and con* s to other kinds irking areas. jeetive of porous ts for this pro­ runoff and asso- lity degradation, s from porous as- nclude: (1) Atten- off rate and vol- d erosion control; of water quality moff from imper- potential for he­ ated; (4) A reduc- it in the need for sewer installation ) Maintenance of Dn and drainage luction or elimina- ce factor to pedes- ist from standing iporary storage in (7) Increase in the ndwater recharge in water defficient iproved road safe- her friction coeffi- hydroplaning and :oi.cern using po- s its susceptibility »d on past experi- >m should not oc- > and maintenance effectiveness during the melt- accumulated on lin occurs when frozen. The test showed that this • intage in the use :nt is that some odes are not in- / technology. For mlibnal draining , gutters inlets, y required in all en the construc­ ts pavement in- 5S less economi- B Grass Conquers Concrete Hardly anyone in Stuttgart takes notice of the pleasant grassy areas that are used as parking lots around the sports stadium, parks and residential areas. On closer examination these turn out to be surfaced with perforated building blocks that have grass growing out of the 2 to 3 inch square openings. Only by walking atop the lawn surface or when seeing cars parked surprisingly on what looks just a lawn, is one aware that the grassy meadow is in reality a parking lot. The solution not only looks better than blacktop or wall-to-wall concrete, it helps the city "breathe" with many more acres of greenery that absorb water and give off oxygen to improve the microclimate. When Arno Loessner, who teaches public ad­ ministration at the University of Delaware asked city officials about the lawned lots on a visit to Stuttgart last year they expressed surprise at his interest. "Why, we've been doing this for years," was the tenor of the response, isn't everyone'" Well the answer is No, very few communities in the U.S., it seems, are on to this good and simple idea that improves the environment, helps the urban- climate, looks nice, and takes just a little bit more of an effort than conventional hard surfacing. We don't have an actual cost compari­ son, but have asked for one. (The perforated blocks themselves run about $5.00 per square meter, surface preparation is extra.) The Stuttgart public works department points out that the perforated blocks manufactured by several suppliers need to be bedded into a thin layer of sand (about 1/2 inch). The top of the seeded top soil that is swept into the holes must be about 1/2 inch below the surface of the slotted or perforated block to prevent com­ pacting. The lawn blocks are also used for garage driveways in housing areas, for walkways in cemeteries and gardens, to prevent erosion on slopes adjacent to roads and waterways as well as to protect ind set off ornamental trees in re 'dential areas. They are not suitable for parking lots used throughout the day, as the surface needs four to five hours of daylight on an average to keep the grass green. This limitation makes lawned parking lots the perfect solution for residential areas and public facilities that are not used continuously throughout each day. Examples: sports installations, schools, libraries, museums, parks, zoos, some government buildings, post offices, etc. The U,S. military inadvertently handed this good idea to Stutt­ gart's city fathers when the latter borrowed miles of temporary metal runways back in 1961 to serve as parking lots for the Federal Carden Show. Soon after the corrugated rolls of slotted track were turned back, having served their purpose, local authorities, concerned over the adverse envir­ onmental impact of asphalted parking lots, looked around for a permanent solution. Not exactly a space program spin-off, but surely a beneficial one. Now all that is needed to complete the circle is an American community to re-import the idea from Germany ■ Post Office Box 66 • Cryst Calvary Mem< 24 20 Dunwoo' Wayzata, MN cc: Bert H NOTICE OF F Date of Mee Votes: Planning Cc Ap Ap De Tc Tc NOTES AND S landscaping variance so be presente Appi.ic Applic addit; meetir for tl In all cast requested : or the Cit^ If the app! contact th< If you de they are and appro Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323• Municipal Offices Telephone 473-7357 Calvary Memorial Church 2420 Dunwoody Avenue Wayzata, MN 55391 Variance Conditional Use Permit Subdivision, Preliminary Date of Notice 7^1Q-Rl cc: B^rt Hoglund NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Meeting _ Votes: S For 7-18-83 Against Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval: As submitted Approval: Subject to conditions noted Approval: Additional information required before Council meeting Denial: For reasons noted Tabled: Pending receipt of additional information from applicant Tabled: Pending review by others, or further Planning Commission study No action required NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS Please be prepared to offer a plan adopting landscaping and surface tiling techniques to balance the excessive hardcover variance sought in the proposed application. The City Engineer's report will be presented at the action meeting next month._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Planning Commission August 15, 1983 Council Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the _________________________ meeting is ________________________; or ________________________________ for the _____________________________ meeting. In all cases, the application must be continued with the submittal of Requested information within or the City will consider the application as formally withdrawn. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Administrator. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission Minutes they are available from the Building and Zoning Secretary upon review and approval by the Planning Commission. • l\ ■^£0 O' MIIMNEI WATERI P.O. Box 387, Wa) BOARD OF MANAGERS: David H. Cochran. Pres. • Albert July 29, Ms. Jeanr City Admi City of C PU Box 66 Crystal B 764 766 767 Dear Ms. In respor applicati follow! nc onal Use Permit sion. Preliminary e 7-1 uncil meeting rom applicant ng Commission plan adopting sive hardcover r’s report will :eipt of nittal of awn. n, please 'mission Minutes ipon review II Ut 1 ■ V ,1 t iV ■'1 mm i-. mK-j r^' V.-.'. MIIMIMEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 UKC MINNITONKA ■OARD OF MANAGERS: David H. Cochran, Praa. • Albert L. Lehman • John C. Thomas • Barbara R. Godmundion • Michael R. Carroll July 29, 1983 o* ^e Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth City Administrator City of Orono PU Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 13 ilf.; • AUG-21963 Re: 764 - Calvary Memorial Church 766 - McDonald's Corporation 767 - Sid Rebers - Subdivision CITY OF ORONO Dear Ms. Mabusth: In response to your request regarding comments of the above mentioned applications. The District staff has reviewed these plans and offer the following comments. 764 - Calvary Memorial Church - Variance unconditional use. The calucations submitted with your information package appear to be consistent with past Board requirements for the management of stormwater runoff. However, to adequately review the application, the District will require a Final Site Grading and Drainage Plan. This plan shall include both existing and proposed contour elevations and a detail of ^ outlet structure for the proposed stormwater retention pon?T 766 - McDonald's Corporation - Corxlitional use permit. In order to adequately review this proposal, the applicant shall submit a Final Site Grading and Drainage Plan. This plan shall include provisions to provide retention and water quality for stonnwater runoff. The existing site includes a 24 inch KCP located on the southeast quadrant. The applicant shal 1 . include hydrogeologic calculations to support the Final Grading and Drainage Plan, and ensure the District that the rate of runoff through this 24 inch RCP shall not increase as a result of the development . -Vr jSoH€dh04 2335 W. Si, Ptd, Afii»aU pUm»> 6f2‘636- f’SOi August City o Box 66 Crysta Attn: Re: Fi Dear J We hav Memori tional The dr storag sign d not Im runoff If the mend a the ad develo effect the pr Glenn GRC:11 6257b :o be :o nnwater :r1ct wi 11 I include 1 outlet 1 submit a provi sions The uadrant . rt the he rate of of the 2335 W. 36 Si. Pmml, M(mmaitim 55ff3 Pimm: 6f2^636^3600 MHWau t-300-622-6573 Olio C. Bootilroo, P.£. Bohert !♦'. Bosene, P.E, Joseph C Andtrlik, P.E. Bradford A. Lemheff, P.E, Bichard E. Tamer, P.E, James C Olson, P.E. August 5» 1983 Cfenn B. Cook, P.E, /Ceilh A, CorthK. P.E. Thonm E. Nojeu P^E, Bkhofd W. Fouee. P,E, Boben C. Sehonkhi, P.E, Manfin L. Sonmh, P.E, Donald C. Bargardl, P.E, Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E Mark A. Hanson, P.E, TedtC. Field, P.E. Mkhael T. Rauimann, P.E. Boberi§f Pfefferk, P.E. Charles A. Erkkson Leo M. Pawelsky Harlan M. Olson city of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn. 55323 Attn: Ms* Jeanne Mabusth Re: File No. 139-764 Dear Jeanne, Ue have reviewed the storm water runoff Information submitted by the Calvary Memorial Church at 2420 Dunwoody Avenue to determine the effect of the addi­ tional hardcover* The drainage calculations as submitted are acceptable and provide for pond storage of 0*116 acre feet with a 9*3 cfs outlet capacity* The proposed de­ sign does not adequately justify an Increase In hardcover as the pond would not Improve the percolation rate Into the ground but would control the rate of runoff to that which exists at the present time* If the variance to the hardcover ordinance Is to be granted, we would recom­ mend a pond designed to Improve the percolation rate or slow the discharge of the additional runoff* This detail could be adequately worked out with the developer and City staff* It would not be possible to totally mitigate the effect of the additional hardcover but a plan could be developed to Improve on the present proposal* Yours very truly. BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R* Cook GRC:11 6257b Pi TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Zoning C Applicat Ordinanc 0-50' - 50'-100' List of Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Property with loc shoreline placemen build a be able subject use of tl the exte] Staff se< location with the I would : 1. Appl: buil< 2.Dock prin< 3.Per ] boat towai Ckmn Coo*. Kfitfi A, P.C. Tk0mm £. Noj««i £.£ Pkh§r^ W, Fotm. £.£. Mchfft G. Sdmrikki, £.£. MofWn £. Sdrvolt, £.£. DoitMC. P,E. Jfrry A. Bottfdom^ P.E Mof* /4. Mantom, £.£. rf^£. £M. £.£ Mkfmf r. JloMimofiii, £.£ ItoAirf^ FMftrk, £.£. CAofVs /«. EfkkMm Uo M. Pi§we(skjf Hvkn M. CMsoii the Calvary f the addl- for pond roposed de­ pond would 1 the rate of ould recom- dlscharge of t with the tigate the to Improve on mmM TO: FROM; DATE; SUBJECT; Planning Conunission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator August 10, 1983 #765 - Rudolph HocK " 875 Partenwood Lane - Variance Zoning District - LR-IB Application - Setback variance for dock Ordinance - LMCD — Section 3.02 Subdivision 2(b) 0-50' - dock must be 10' from side property lines extended 50'-100' dock must be 15* from side property lines extended List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Applicant's addendum Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Plat Map Exhibit E - Plat Survey Exhibit F - LMCD Ordinance 3.02 - Subdivision 2(b) Exhibit G - LMCD Ordinance 3.02 - Subdivision 9(a) Exhibit H - Affidavits from neighbors Property owners within this section of Stubbs Bay have always had difficulty with locating docks to meet the required setbacks as a result of the curved shoreline and shallow depths. Each neighbor has been able to work out the placement and use of their dock without problems. The applicant plans to build a new home on Lot 6 this year, but wants reassurance that he will be able to have a usable residential dock. Neighbors on either side of the subject lot have submitted affidavits approving the proposed location and use of the dock. Note the dock is to be placed so that it will not cross the extension of their lot lines. Staff sees no problem with approving the application findin*.f the proposed location and use of the dock is acceptable and that this use is consistent with the pattern of residential dock use within the Stubbs Bay neighborhood. I would suggest the following conditions 1.Applicant submit survey showing dock' building permit uJj boOi'i ______ location when applying for a 2.Dock is an accessory structure and cannot be constructed until the principal structure is completed 3.Per LMCD 3.02 Subdivision 9, the property owner shall be limited to one boat per 50' of continuous shoreline. The additional 21* will not apply toward a second boat. Review Exhibit G. ,S‘. 1 IMSTRUCTIONS; Pleate fir. (Type or P dcecrlbe y< -t- 1.PROPERTY a: de.crlptlfl 2. APPLICANT 3 • OWNER Name _ heixlin] Date Prope I (do 4. AGENT - Flna _ Meillni 5 . NOTICES She 6. PRESENT 2C 7. PRESENT UJ Vacai DESCRIBE ] cjcab le - Variance ded nded always had difficulty result of the curved ble to work out the applicant plans to nee that he will n either side of the posed location and it will not cross ndin*.f the proposed s use is consistent bbs Bay neighborhood. applying for a ucted until the 11 be limited to one al 21* will not apply mmmmm A ..ai i: S ZONING VARIANCE AEi-'LiUAi CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 _^^22l221L ‘9. INSTRUCTIONS: Please first read the attached Infonnatlon Sheet. - - - - - - - - (Type or Print). If needed, attach letter or other Information to (jeecrlbe your re<juest. Incomplete applications will not e accep e^tITY o| OrW EXHIBITS 9' j / a ^ 4 PROPERTY ADDRESS fi. Bloci^ ? Pnrtenwond - Pnrteiywypd lane Legal description shall be shown on attached Survey, Exhibit 3 Deaerlotlon Initial Application must Include: 2 • APPLICANT Name Thiflnlph A i Phone ?S?SrU2691 T.ittnn Microwave, P.O. Box 94G1 H-lllng Address -^^j^eapollS, Ml^ bhCT If Applicant la not ovn.r. ...i.in Appl i cailt has a signed Purchase Agreement for said property— OWNER N.~ niidolnh A. Hoch------Pi>orc—553-R691 h..u»g Addr... Same as above Date Property Acquiredr (drnot) also own other adjace-^^? parcels of land AGENT «•>» Gregory D. Tiimi------------------------Ph... - 559-1783 Attorney at I^awFirm Mailing Addreaa _ NOTICES Should be sent Co: 3140 Harbor Lane, Plymouth, MN 55441 Applicant Owner X Agent PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT LnvCJb. ____ (Other) __________ 1 2 3 Application Form Property (Xmers List Certificate of Survey Fee Receipt # !i Date Received *?*“// Staff Information 4 _ _ Plat Map 5 Inventory 5 _ Staff Conmanta Other Information 7 8 9 10 11 12 7. PRESENT USE RealdentUl Vacant band _^ Vacant Bulldtng(s)Occupied Bulldlng(s) _ N/ADESCRIBE REQUEST ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $_ _ establish new uae _ contlt . e or expand existing use — build new — add on — remodel — replace - • ■■'sTrm’m ku .^rf] I m U»-:9 V > V.^ 'i- ■'■■■•V'' .'^ \V -ivV> I ; EXHIBIT DOCK USE VARIANCE REQUEST RUDOLPH A. HOCH LOT 6. BLOCK 2, PARTENWOOD PARTENWOOD LANE Q Mr- HocU hereby respectfully requests a variance to Section 3.02 !’K^<^r<!!r2rb^ o/the Lake MinLtonka Conservation District rule as adopted w .if City if If oi Tifserb^ck provisions of this provision will create an fusuaily ind undue hardship for Mr. HocM due to ‘h* ^ f the side site line and the shallow water prevelant in this area. As snown J^hiMt A atLched if the side site lines are extended directly into Stubbs Bay they will intersect at a point approximately 63 feet from the ^ho^eUnL The water at this depth is presently 3.5 feet, /or docking ^ purposes it will be necessary to place a dock extending at least 60 i . Grubbs Bav A dock of this length could not comply with the setback fffemencs of Section 3.02 Subdivision 2(b). This parcel has a shoreline of approximately 71 feet and located on over 1.6 acres. 10. The unusual design of this lot along with shallow depth of “ inposslble to dock an average size Lake Minnetonka boat on this lot while compllng with setback provisions* rW-£ v^: 'A • .j‘9 i>A' ! I 1903m :n r niTYOFORONO I -V >■- wm it *-V ‘ fAf. iLV ^ i M '.it 4 •'I • 8 M* at at r-t t- j:i 8 O ! NO •>3't *M 2i:S'ch / V IZt f* :>ST 00 D I «• ■ fe«, m •?... /% ^ exhibit STUBBS BAY lake MINNETONKA «.-;. •• J -. ••• • ;•• ■*• T" ••• •'* * •■ f '^*M' \ i £j i r f PARTENWOOD I CA^/s - V. • iitVv'. r* <» • • • V y <r Ji'c.'/ro •■"■/"••« 1^ P?:3 m m >V. . .*■ ■'* S* wr A. ^ ^ <i i -/. J f \ #>i r^. .•^ n‘ \Vi©Lr'^ ^ JUL 1 119631 ..-^ 1 / c •A ^•N• V CITY OF PRO / 4 ' ySjr a-*^:••.*'•■''A-t/ hi'j. £ js r £xAi Ai'/’A'/ 4 ♦ \ \ ^ i6 y \. ki/ w I^K' w :• .. V. ••." "• i4' :'' ’ "fit:: ■ mM. rr-^l Ml - Subd. out th secure public lation moorin that s also s Direct sary, (Ord. 3.02 . person use ar jump s permit use an docks, or div person whethe allow craft week; boats establ tating to sue a ing on site L lines Lake a docks of oth lines in exi dock u limite said d the sh I . exhibit 3.011, Subd. 2 Rev. 6/1/82 Subd. 2. Purpose. It is the purpose of this chapter to carry out the LMCD*s statutory responsibility under the enabling act to secure the safety of the public, to insure the most general public use of the lake, and to regulate the construction, instal­ lation and maintenance of permanent and temporary docks and moorings consistent with federal and state law. To the extent that standards established by other governmental authorities are also set forth in provisions of this chapter, the Board of Directors has independently found that such standards are neces­ sary, proper and consistent with the purposes of this chapter. (Ord. No. 18, Sec. 2) 3.02 GENERAL REGULATIONS. Subdivision 1. Prohibition. No person shall use any area of the Lake outside an authorized dock use area, for docks, moorings, boat storage, swimming floats, ski jump storage or diving towers, unless such use is specifically permitted under the provisions of this chapter. No person shall use any area of the Lake within any authorized dock use area for docks, moorings, boat storage, swimoning floats, ski jump storage or diving towers without the consent of the riparian owner. No person who is in charge or control of any property on the lake whether as owner, tenant, occupant, lessee, or otherwise, shall allow any sunken, wrecked, junked, or discarded boat or water­ craft within any dock use area for a period of longer than one week; provided, however, that this limitation shall not apply to boats or watercraft within the dock use area of a commercial establishment engaged in the business of repairing and rehabili­ tating boats or watercraft and which is so engaged with regard to such boat or watercraft. (As amended Ord. No. 26; Ord. No. 42) Subd. 2. Authorized Dock Use Area. An authorized dock use area is described as follows: a) Length - The authorized dock use area for sites border­ ing on the Lake extends into the Lake a distance equal to the site Lake frontage to be measured at right angles to the side site lines and, except as provided herein, shall not extend into the Lake a distance of greater than 200 feet in the case of commercial docks in existence on August 30, 1978, and 100 feet in the case of other docks to be measured on a line parallel to the site side lines as extended into the Lake. In the case of commercial docks in existence on August 30, 1978, the lakeward extension of the dock use area more than 100 feet from the shoreline shall be limited to the distance from shore of the docks in existence on said date and that portion of said docks more than 100 feet from the shoreline may not be altered or expanded. (As amended, Ord. 44) '51 [iOBDWISff^ JOl I I 1983 r ; • ‘ I » \ -“•ViV.-.-V, . >ubd. 2 L/82 : to carry ibling act to jeneral :ion, instal- :ks and :he extent lorities are ird of 5 are neces- » chapter. Lon.No lorized dock j floats, ski »cifically person shall jse area for jump storage owner. No 1 the lake ^ise, shall or water- r than one [lot apply to nmercial r»d rehabili- Lth regard ; Ord. No. 42) zed dock use ites border- al to the the side site nd into the of conunercial in the case the site side mercial docks ion of the shall be xistence on 00 feet from mended, Ord. A4) I I 1963 f i \ OF 0,;[;» ti • 3.02, Subd. 2 Rev. 6/1/82 (cont*d) b) Width - The authorized dock use area for sites bordering on the Lake is limited in width by the setback limitations pre­ scribed herein. The setback from side site lines as extended in the Lake shall be as follows: For that portion of the length of the authorized dock use area which extends from the shore _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ The setback shall be Zero to 50 feet 50 to 100 feet 100 to 200 feet 10 feet 15 feet 20 feet Where boat slips open toward a side site line, the setback pro­ vided shall be at least equal to the slip depth, but shall not be less than 20 feet. Setbacks shall be doubled for all multiple docks or mooring areas and commercial docks on each side where such multiple docks are not located adjacent to another multiple dock or mooring area or commercial dock. (As Amended, Ord. No. 14, Sec. 2; Ord. No. 18, Sec. 3; Ord. No. 19, Sec. 2; Oird-^—ttcn ttT c) Measurement - Authorized dock use areas shall be measured from the point which forms the shoreline when the Lake is at elevation 929.4, National Geodetic Vertical Datum, 1929. During periods when the Lake level falls below 929.4 feet and when so declared by resolution of the Board, the Executive Director may issue permits for temporary dock extensions beyond the author­ ized dock use area subject to the following limitations: 1.) Need for the temporary dock extension must be demonstrated by the applicant. 2.)The extension shall be a temporary, seasonal type dock. No extensions may be on pile driven or permanent year-round docks. 3.) The extension shall meet all requirements of this Code other than the length limitation described in this section. 4.)The extension shall only be permitted during the time the water level is below elevation 929.4 feet and, at any given time, shall be permitted only to the extent of the equivalent dockage and comparable depth existing at a lake elevation of 929.4 feet. 5.)The extension, together v/ith the original dock, shall not be used to provide storage space for a greater number of boats or watercraft than are authorized under this Code or for a greater number of boats or watercraft than are licensed if a license for the dock is required under this Code. (Ord. 28) ment, their dock < any e outer use. mainti "mult: is coi waterc 3d. 2 ''82 (cont*d) 5S bordering bions pre- extended in ^all be tback pro- shall not all multiple ide where er multiple , Ord. No. 14, I- Wu. ■■4-4.■ 1 be measured e is at 29. During d when so rector may e author- ns: be 1 type or f this ibed ig the >.4 feet only to >mparable I feet. lock, for a are : number E a > Code. ^ A ■i ^ m ' »' ♦ il ---• •■‘.■ K-yV ■ fc::' • VS 3.02, Subd. 3 Rev. 6/1/82 Areas!““* = Modifications of Authorized Dnok .... n.ent/idjust ?Sesrside':ite"L^h"%°“"""? “^ree- their combined authorized dock use%ren*^for'"a"si °Tdock or mooring area for their for a single common any event, must observe these side^«5et-Ha%^^^'^^^® uses, but in outer site lines of . setback requirements at the use. A dock ormooring ar^"^ maintained under this provision shall not^hf ’•multiple dock or moorinrarea" unleL sLh ? is constructed or maintained for i-he c=4. dock or mooring area watercraft. »"aintained for the storage of five or more ■'H¥ s commer betwee Ord. N S this o more s figura confli sites areas owner variar permit struct ordinc or nee Sectic posts, howev< which other tinue until of an No. 1 ing a estab docki of CO surem the F inclu one 1 Amend moon and V and Augus jbd. 3 L/82 sed Dock use :ual agree*- may use common s, but in ts at the ch a joint stalled or ed a coring area or more ...V.rnmm 3.02, Subd. 6 Rev. 12-23-82 <;iibd. 6. Extensions. No multiple dock or mooring area or commercial dock shall extend across the extended zone line between sites zoned differently by a municipality. (As Amended Ord. No. 18, Sec. 3) « Subd. 7. Unusual Configurations. Where the provisions of this ordinance would cause the authorized dock use area of two or more sites to overlap, or where there is any other unusual con­ figuration of shoreline or extended lot lines, which causes a conflict between the owners of two or more adjacent or nearby sites as the use of the same area of the lake for docks, mooring areas or other structures or for reasonable access thereto, the owner of any of the affected sites may apply to the Board for a variance pursuant to Section 3.04. A variance may be (a) to permit the applicant to locate a dock, mooring area or other . structure in a location different from that permitted by this ordinance or (b) to permit or require the owner of any adjacent or nearby site to do so. Subd. 8. Docks: Dimension Limits. A dock as defined in Section 3.01, Subdivision 2, may exceed six feet, excluding posts, in either its length or width, but not both; provided, however, that docks which are in existence on June 30, 1982 and which are in compliance with all the provisions of the LMCD Code other than this Section 3.02, Subd. 8 shall be allowed to con­ tinue in their present form without expansion or modification until such time as. such docks are replaced or until 50% or more of any such dock is damaged or destroyed. (As amended, Ord. No. 12, Sec. 2; Ord. No. 55.) Subd. 9. Shoreline Requirements. a) No new docks or moor­ ing areas other than commercial docks shall be constructed or established which provide space for or are used for mooring or docking a greater number of watercraft than one for^each 50 feet of continuous shoreline in existence on May 3, 1978. When mea­ surements determining the number of watercraft allowed result in the provision of a fractional watercraft, any fraction up to and including one half (1/2) shall be disiegarded, and fractions over one half (1/2) shall allow one additional watercraft. (As Amended Ord. No. 40) b) Four or fewer watercraft may be kept at any dock or mooring facility which is otheivi'^r in compliance with this code and with the requirements of th^; ;>v::al land use control authority and which is located on a site which is in existence on August 30, 1978. comme: betwe< Ord. 1 this G more s figure confli sites areas owner < varian< permit structi ordinar or near Sectic posts, howeve which other tinue until of any Ko. 12, Sub ing area establis! docking of conti: surementi the prov: includinc one half Amended c «ooring £ and with and which August 30 2, Subd. 6 . 12-23-82 ing area or lone line (As Amended ovisions of :ea of two or inusual con- h causes a . or nearby cks, mooring thereto, the Board for a be (a) to a or other . :ed by this any adjacent defined in excluding ; provided, 30, 1982 and the LMCD Code »wed to con- odification 50% or more inded, Ord. Dcks or moor- structed or r mooring or each 50 feet I. When mea- wed result xn ion up to and fractions over raft. (As any dock or 1th this code trol authority itence on is# ■ 1 >■ * I.;! ■■ ~yi ■If -TT/'-ii ■ EXHIBIT 3.02, Subd. 6 Rev. 12-23-82 ori. »o. 7,™ sites as thruse two or morrart'-i. « areas of other str^ctSleror 7®® lake for ^docks'"owner of any of the 5 ^9^ reasonable acce^<f pursuant to c 9^®^ sites may apply to i-h the fScture locat^a aoct moor*^® to ordinance or (b) .^i^ferent from' that other or nearby site to do the owner of any adjacent Subd. 8. posts. in ■ sV°fe’'et® i«however that- ^ ^ongth or width Kh^- a.^9^^' excluding i*•< .5i’d2¥c5i surements determinino n ®*istence on May 3 iq-7o feet tte provision of a fraction!!?*’®'^ watercraft alloJ^a '*®” i"®®' including one half (1/2, .J’V, ”®tercraft, any frac??^^ ^n one half (1/2) .ha'n *’® ‘disregarded V s""! Amended Ord. No. 4o/^ ®How one additional^watercraft*^^°"As°''®*^ "a. August 30. 1978. ® =^te which is in* e‘"xTs\Mce®*'on°''^^^ . . . . >2, Subd. 6 ^ 12-23-82 Ing area or one line (As Amended )visions of -3 of ^wo or msual con- causes a or nearby , mooring ereto, the card for a e (a) to or other * by this / adjacent efined in deluding rovided, 1982 and LMCD Code 1 to con- fication X or more d, Ord. or moor- icted or oring or ^ 50 feet ben mea- result in *P to and ions over (As lock or bis code authority on JV -i4'.i • ^ 7^ IcyMIPIT hereby consent to the proposed variance I nabriel fir .Tabbour— --T p «och will request from the City of Oronowhich Rudolph A Hoch and Phyl I understand that the Hoch sthicrmpli'i^: H^cirrad Tu;d;rstand that the Hoch‘s and the Lake Minnetonka Conse normal setback requirements for their shall be requesting a . . variance will make it possible for them to .Voirrrcr-rn‘f e«en,ions o. Xo. XXnes. / 7/ ?//^ 3 Gabj\iel E. Date 780 Vonkaway Ro nSSSBSSSp IT 'ariance .ty of Orono the Hoch*s :s for their for them to t lines. 3 t . EXHIBIT it Richard C. Erickson hereby consent to the proposed variance which Rudolph A. Hoch and Phyllis P. Hoch will request from the City of Orono and the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District* I understand that the Hoch's shall be requesting a variance from the normal setback requirements for their dock* I also understand that this variance will make it possible for them to place a dock so that it will not cross the extensions of their lot lines* Richard C. Erickson Lot 5 Block 2 Partenwood Lane Date ■n i * f TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Zoning C Applicat Lot Requ Exis Vari Lot Reqt Exis Exis Yard Var: Renewal App] Mr. Geh; he does to dete: a hardc' Staff r to appr to perm follow! 1.The dev 2* 3* The The prc 4 * Sev 1 variance City of Orono at the Hoch's ents for their le for them to lot lines* SUBJECT: Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator August 11# 1983 #770 - Ronald Gehring - 1396 Baldur Park Road Renewal - Variance - Appii?atiIn’^-°Lot atea^^and lot width variance Lot area Required Existing Variance 21,780 sa. 12,870 sq. 8,910 sq. ft. ft. ft. or 41% Lot width Required - 100’ Existing at shoreline - 50' Existing at road - 60' Variance at shoreline - 50* or 50% Variance at road - 40' or 40% Renewal Variance Approved - March 20, 1972 - January 30, 1980 - November 30, 1981 Mr. Gehring has not presented a site plan with he does not have a specific house plan as yet. He would like the tity to determine the limits of an approved ®"‘*tf®a®‘^stlndardsa hardcover limitation. Gehring will design a home to meet those standards. Staff recommendations: to approve the lot area and lot width variance application of Ronald Gehring to permit the construction of a single family residence based on the following findings: 1. The proposed building site will be consistent with the pattern of development of the surrounding properties. 2. There is no additional land available to combine with subject property. 3. The City has approved three similar variance applications for this property. 4. Sewer is available to the site. #770 - August Page 2 This ap imp wal The con App int Road - Variance - ication because like the City and establish eet those standards. :ion of Ronald Gehring 5 based on the the pattern of Lth subject property nations for this .i Vt '•.V i-: •. 'U'. m V i-- sm #770 - Ronald Gehring August 11, 1983 Page 2 This approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. improvements on the site (includes decks, patios, drainage, cement walkways, etc.) shall be limited to 2,280 sq. ft. of hardcover. 2. 3. 4. 5. No structure (includes decks and patios) may not be located closer than 75* from the lakeshore in addition, the principal structure must meet the average lakeshore setback of houses on abutting lots. Staff will designate required setback at time building permit is applied for. The side yard setback of 10* must be maintained. The street setback for the principal structure is 30 *. Special consideration should be given in location of the drive and garage in limiting unnecessary hardcover. Applicant must quit claim deed that portion of Baldur Park Road chat intersects the property area to include 3* maintenance ditch. f-, . r ‘ • r;,^i in CM M Q. § • iii O I lU CC X h o90 fto S ^ < c O a: K Q < Ui O. V ^ ft ^ lu Sj 5 o o a M o S S 1—9 |V - S * 3 5^ <0 o bj l&j Ij g^Soffl O o CM ^ b4 Ui 'f r Ui H 10 oCM ft Os ^O It cl N < ^ ID I $ inCO 90 O o2 < 2 M o ft X CO ft LU LU ^ iO -i -J It 32IC:2g«! Q ^ ft 2 ^ O ft «SSS<y o lu u ^ fi ID CQ CD CO CO < lu l&j cc «ll*sSS552 u 9- lAJ ft|a:i a25?l^ a o I- ^ j i exhibit Certificate of Survey for Robert J. Veilleux of Lot 16, BLocV. I, raidur Park Hennepin County, Kinnesota toLd'rlL cl- 16, aoc. 1, ?ar.-. and the Location cf all exislir.t, builain§^. , if an.-, thereo: . It doet- not purport to show other iroprovcnentr. or er.crcac.iinent^. Gcrdon K. Coffin Heg./3^. ^4 Alvin H. Rehder Rm::. !>,l>2yp ijHnd ■ ir^’eyors and Planners liong Ln’<e, Kir.ner.ota Scale: V = 30’ Date : 11-7-79 o : Iron :.virker TO; FROM DATE SUBJl Zonir Applj LIST C Exhibi Exl-.ibi Exhibi Exhibi Exhibi Exhibi Grabil within type o north The at area b increa the ol< increa I remove< • ••• ••• 7t^, '4''-‘'''■*:^-Ji ^ i •*. • 1 ^ t.'i*;v i Ai-1 j 1-u TO: FROM; DATE: SUBJECT; Planning Commission Jeanne A. Mabusth August 10, 1983 #771 Larry Grabill, 1350 Rest Point Lane - Variances Zoning District - LR-lB Application - Hardcover increase variances within the 0-75' setback area and the 75'-250' setbacH area a) Hardcover 0-75' setback area • Area = 4,500 sf Allowed = 0 Existing = 825 sf or 18% Proposed = 1,322 sf or 29% Increase =*11% increase within the 0-75' setback area b) Hardcover 75' - 250' setback area Area 5,694 sf Allowed = 1,424 sf or 25% Existing =: 2,580 sf* or 45% (1,200 sf or 21% is shared drive) <^'200 sf or 21% is .narerdri^e) Increase = 4% increase in hardcover within 75'-250' setback area * 480 sf garage ^ rsf drive + turnaround 2,580 sf LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A ExI'ibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Application Property Owners List Plat Map Survey Site Plan Elevations wi?hi“thro°?V the existing cabin located4- c protected area. His plan resembles the same no?th°f fervear!^bacn“°" Performed on the lot to the immediate Theattached"g:ra\e “^Li"nor?ncrea1e'h2rdclver"SijhL “?he"p^ Variances le 0-75' area ■i tV .. back area is shared drive) is *5nared drive) 5'-250' setback area )in located the same the inunediate ition in file) . .n the protected •cation does Portions of to prevent ing must be A- ■;r/ .... ' ^ ■ f \ V - .to #771 Larry Grabill Variance Page 2 The proposed plan calls for an addition of 11% of hardcover - major portions of new living space will be gained by going up If Planning Commission sets a limit on the size of the rear addition to existing building/ the attached garage will still give you an 11% increase within protected area. The property has reached a saturation point - applicant and all future buyers must be made aware that additional hardcover will not be permitted. STAFF RECOMMENDATION To approve the hardcover variance application of Larry Grabill permitting an increase of 11% of hardcover within the 0-75* protected area for the remodeling and rear addition to the principal structure located at 1350 Rest Point Lane based on the following findings: 1 - Location of existing structure on lot. 2 — Lot could never be built on and meet current standards of the LR-lB zonina district. 3 - There is no additional land available/vacant lot to south is combined with lot to immediate west. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1 - Applicant must remove 240 sf of existing paving along west property line - there can be no increase in hardcover with the 75' - 250' setback area. 2 -No new structures may be located within the 0-75' protected area - this includes decking - patios - walkways - etc. 3 -No future variances will be granted to this severely limited property. Mi i.. ft UJ 2c: o Q K) a u o a c O lii<.555 a - CM H ly I (A O « ^ a ^ < 7 o lA : lA CD I CO ^ ^ 'ro o z: dcover - going up. e rear 11 still property ture buyers be permitted. y Grabill 0-75' ;o the lased on ilong hardcover protected - etc. rely limited M OL • UJo o I- § M h* g H lA H z in M « UJ CK O UJo. >• o ♦-ss >• o ttaI Z M CL r4 X UJ 5 DC rr Ui u M too o K DC ^ UJ Q DC O SH UJ Oz X w a ♦ M u z ^ ID J o ID O 5hS-*SS ^ «J ID X ID a ID •• S®MrDg •H 1-4 I ® 5 CD M-'g ID <D I- I ID ID I-I cx 1-4 I <0ID •u t» ^ X ID§ u o O ID ID COID O -J z . < ID H « HID M Z ID ^ M ID Z ^ O ID ID M CL “ ^ ^ .D ID X M -J DC _ X UI 9 3 ID Z -1X^2 < ID O ID ID «H X U K < H O K M O ID U. o M ID DC 3 O r-4 DC HZ H-Z CD M ID O ID CD I r-4 r-l I 0ID a < H H UI ID UJ < “g ID O X ID ID r-io X O O ID CL QC ID ID * z"Si 2: “•«M O -J H Z cr ID O CD M to O a ID CD r- r-l z z o 9ID ID Z Z oo H I UI DC o o -1 •> H- D> Z to M ID O IDa o o ID < UJ a X K O to to fH Z ZM M > > DC a <t < X X ID Z UJ X Z ID M Z •DOMa M Kl ID CD H O I ID < |s. ID M OC tt ID ID ID Z O ID M QC I IDz o Z ID Oto o M X O ID _ <0 < •D M « rH O m O ID ID O ^ O O Z < O X ID ^ ID Z ^ Z5°3ID C^ Q. o CD g ID CD X a... s COID O O o QC CD to <u ID CD I r-l r4 I h- M OC in 5^. ID CD to M ID _ ^ “Si <• < H ID ID H « CO ID 8 CD Ui f-4 r4 ID CD I r4 iH I Mo CL X U M M ID UI QC a M -O 3= 2u M ID M O ID ~ CL _ M X O < r4n >0 aX COID k,5 X ID u M M O QC CL H _ ID Z ID Xa a _ aRl QC M X o o O DC O O MzrD M ID O CL ID CD M I ID ID M QC r-4 I O ID O' ID 0 1-4 ID O 2 5 o 9ID ID UI Ui O O ID UJ OC OC ID CD to O ^ Qg ID ID ^ ID < CD O O M M QC QC Ui ui ID go o OC OC M ID ID ZM UI ^ CL ID O •H X g “9 5 ID 89 Ui DC a < ae Q K < U iL UI a s ID OC Xo < a z a a UJo g i O QC Ui >• < CL 5 H- QC O3 \ Ui 5 EXH\B\T i.T’ tH I- H 4 C '1 V.’, »**1 • ■1-3 V». I here true f of a J that I lyine on th' North* ALSO of th- North' Lake Road South Lot ? its e of su Point thenc and 1 purpe a po: Souti H of 5 Seal te o Uloo Ui I » U.) o ■ ■ ’-.mi exhibit A^r* A »r Certificate of Survey for Larry S. Crabill in Lot 21, Subdivision of Lot 14, nest Point Park Lake Kinnetonka and Gevorninent Lot 2, Section 7-117-23 - V. .Vf // ^ i,r * ' •tr / r - n' I hereby certify that this is a true and correct represent’jticn of a survey of the beuridaries o nrietc.nka,of a sur^'ey oi c< ur.. w ^ that part oi Loc a 1 in o U jc-\ ,4 cc-r-r cf said ^t 21 to a pointIvinr fort'O^ly of a line rui.niruj Iron, ooutnvosw cc.n.r c. i/in[ i.oru..-. ^ _.,4J . dir.Lsnt one loot Scuo.. ■J- lylnr Korlrcrly of a y"? one loot ScuU.orly fron. on 1-hn Kanterly lino of LCt adi-iccr.l h«l'' of vonatod alley: Northeast corner c( t.-ld -<■ _> -• ..' Tovr^hip 117 North, aanee 23 West ALSO that part of Govorr.inont cUon ' - the most of the 3th Principal -“on ^ L i-ot Point Park Northerly . ornor of vacated i^at 2o i . ^ coutbeusterly line of Rest Point Lake Kir.neoonka"; thence bortr.eas .eriy ^ ir *s"'id sutoivision; thenceRoad 6 feet to the centerline of the vacated^alloy in .utoivis^^,^^ Southeasterly alone J^sia cMr.tori.ne to ‘ [ forthwesterly line and Lot 21, suid subdivision; thenco fthe root Northerly comer its ext^.)nsion 12 feet to a poi..o 6 iCt.. o xt qo-Uicastorly line of Rest of said Lot 21: thence Northwesterly to a ^aLtJd Lot 20; Point Hoad 6 feet Southwest of the rest Northerly corner o] w.ai thence 6 feet Northeasterly to the oo:nt c.a bccmni . anHl location cf\hi:%u^ey purport to show c.-...:ei *... in.' . t..^ . ^ ^ Vienmt 1/2 'A foet Vestorly from the a point on tlie Southcrl^y ^ piboon assnjw^d tc U: ’'the Southwest corner of said Lot 21" rwintioned in tn*' lefal wesnription. COHDC-K R. COFFIN CO., INC. 1" 40' Iron r;)rk«'r Kark T. Un-rlcrr R-f* No. 12735 Land Surv«’.vors end Manr.ors Lcn<' Lake, I'.innc-scta 7^ . . .. A,/ •f /rr n ‘ nr %*f I .‘ nrifitcinkf', :1 to a pcint utr.«rly from I Hoy ; ini:e 23 West \e most )int Park 3J' Rest Point 3n; thence srly line of rly line and rtherly comer line of Rest a ted Lot 20; , It dees not of this survey sstorly from the :>uthwcst corner INC. IlPf. Nc. Ref.. ;:o. 12755 Mnnf.erc m - rC:h t*. ♦ .% ■i N li’: c :-!AM yM^ ir • • ^ •« * • % •t *. er>!T j=v,.L. :-A p.p/^OVAL. L-i^T .......' • (ZsPtf«>y >40' Pi4r‘3'^^o*• ' tv\o- -[-. • t4A..>AS. .. . ..r. .. 1......................iiaokTia • OOOl .• • OC58 ...— • mmm • - • » occ^...... ....... ' • OCO't ... .. . . . .-•. M-% Oc?9 % Oo.u 00.11 • •♦••• ••• mm • ••» « •• * •• •••-«-» t • • • • • m . ao54 * *•••. .»*• •••♦ • •« «•«» * rnam^- ♦ ^• m mm » * ' • • ^ «»• •» •. •-• •;-n. i *’ "I V •* * •***•*• '.* * *1 ‘ ^ Ao--^; • . IJ . . ■t . .^6* CM A-©rO* : \ s.... '..... SI f - • t . *. MM. ... • M .-« ■ • •' -----I 2t ■■■•-•■••'■ r<S .-V - \[ • I » .• ^ » 'mJ fev': ■" • • • M • * V/I. »f : t ■J . ^ • • ■ ^ *. • I*.i '•V < • • :S^' -T* M ", U^* "., * . • • ”'*^* (/. /C* * i:« ♦ '-1-:-j*.V r rJ-:- ■ V •t-.v? * *.•t • \ EXHIBIT } .< mm mm -—— • f • - • - •- • fV';-‘ .i. WT J« - | T ■ •• ' " t ; " F \ ‘ -. . ------------- S' V Wmm ••%..• « # •« ••••': 'rJZ:eLA£3^:z:r ‘ 6 ’?'.~.^ jg^-.£■ • i£-...' t/'.-VJ'.'±'7'_■/,.., 0 ,_ •« . • *•••' ^ #• * V •*••<.*• * - . • • . f %■ • \ ••.'•*s . * . • - V . ■ •• • -v^.; '?;•' • :•—• • « . • * /. • •} *7 V-, •. .•.... >v.' • 4 -.•••/;*. •* • ;"• •* • v.%>5*-.... • •..' ' V.L,;. ...: ,' • • ' •...' ;••• -.r ■• '.• •.. • •* * %•. * -^*4 ■ • • • ^» .* . • • • *... ^. * • ♦..•• * 4 • ■ • • ./• • ^ . r . •. .* ? » . ' . .*.• ••« y .1 I - / •** ‘ ^ ^ ’ - - ‘:v.;.,. -.* • ^ *• •■• * • 4 g' - 4 ■ ' • • • . 4-^. •* •i • * *•.. <• . • tm ■ id- ".il r a ^4 ^ ^ 1 - h. • i l/--VJ*::i"7r_./..„. Q _/^y f^- #i f >1 .. ,^* •• . ’•’I*-; •• .••• . • * V V. . • • ■ • ;■**•>'*•* * • * - • • • *. %* . '..• •• • ■-,•••• • • -V : : • • .;••= .. . •..*’. • . • • <• '• • • * •. ••. »i ■•;••* •• V . • • •. •*. • ‘‘r * - . . * .* '•’ *“ • .-<1 -r '.c** ‘r:____ • *. i..* .•* ■t. V ■<<4 ; :•• •- 'M T•. '•. . v.-” ■.•■.-; ' - *••*4 *• . ' % t ' ’•I •■•?* *^* */♦ • •#* * •• • •. i" ■ •••• ’. "•• ’ "I'.V? •■ '■ *'' •• ,• *■ ^• ‘ V - ". '■■■ ' r • • ‘ ■ • '•• ■-V : ••■ „v . •./••<,: •*.• j • •• • •••V--‘ «:..••.••. V • - -r »•.* • .‘I . % . •• V •• ^ • •. -f * r * .*• • : • .y ’• • • •*. . • • • • * •it ^ ■;i^‘ -•;* y I • • t •m . . • • 4.^ * • . : .V V.*v ;_ * VI : • #• • • • ’ ' - . •• .^ . • * V *. • •. . • • ./■ ^ ■ • . •• . • •• 11* • • sir 1* •• • .* V- V * \ . . V •••• r >• • I , • .» 1 • •^c; • .• ■■ r / V .♦ s •f U I ••«». • ♦ i • V*‘ ' ^. • \ .*1 • ’ •* • ,t . > V. s'; •• • i • « • • « • % < I * , t • %- ..* I. .••f •> ** .r‘*‘ rilfdii ’nKii •' • . i • * . '• « * • • •* *•.. '• " • • ..v. .V-.\ ’ V, ' t r .4 • • *• • ^ % ^• * •• . *. .• * - v'i f ? - ''itj [if"' '.n: Zoning Dis Area - 15, Applicatic Side £ Requir Exist! Propos Variar Streel Requii Exist: Propoj Variai Side i Requi] Exist. Propo: Variai Hardc Area Allow' Exist Propo Varia List of E Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit E Exhibit I .6»-' TO;Planning Commission Members FROM;Jeanne A. Mabusth, Coning Administrator DATE;August 111 1983 SUBJECT;#772 - R. G. Luesse - 3249 Casco Circle - Variance Zoning District LR-IC toplicatior- Hardcover + setback variance for addition to house and detached garage Side setbacks - Required - 10' Existing - 17' Proposed - 12' Variance - 5* North & South Addition to principal structure Required - 10' Existing - 5.5’ Proposed - 5.5’ Variance - 4.5’ Street setback - detached garage Required - 30' Existing - 48’ Proposed - 24' Variance - 6’ or 20% Side setback - detached garage Required - 10' Existing - 3’ Proposed - 3’ Variance - 7’ or 70% Hardcover 75’-2 50' Area ~ 11.803 sq. ft. Allowed - 2,950 sq. ft. or 25% Existing ~ 2,048 sq. ft. or 17% Proposed - 3,414 sq. ft. Variance - 464 sq. ft. or 4% List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey , . Exhibit E - Factual Finding made by applicant Exhibit F - Neighbor’s letter Exhibit G - Average lakeshore setbacks Exhibit H - Upper level Exhibit I - Ground level I ■*¥ ^il % IV- imi ■ • #772 - F August 1 Page 2 Mr. Luej He -ecei propose' of thos' average of the neighbo porch w from th lakeshe house. the exi area a] In ord€ basemer deck ai The de^ a prob 648 sq is not The se in re.l The wo for sm Staff to apE follO\( 2. L' 3. L This 1.T t & •■F \ 3. 4. 5. 1 I I Variance o house and ipal structure r i f.‘V- ■‘r; 4 wm * ■ . • mm ■ #772 - R. Luesse August 11# 1983 Page 2 of hiq residence for several years. Mr. Luesse has planned for to ordinance limitation and the He -ecently consulted residence and aetached garage are a result proposed plan for enlarging the resioen checked in relation to of those meetings. The lines for adjacent houses. The enclosure average lakeshore was not a sighting problem for the of the deck area as a glazed p 4-oooaraphy and the fact that the neighbor to the north because of constructed - note, the letter porch was originally ®opogal.' The 10 feet extension into the from the Diegres creates no sight problem for lakeshore yard on the south ^ consists of a 10' extension along the front ^Sniisting'sfruft'urftf Stopped with the glazed deck and open deck area along south. j T->i3nc! to excavate and construct ain order to meet storage needs, he pla basement area along the north siue « deck area. The detached garage additio.n to the ®*^|g^g^i°ooo°sq.”ft'^ in^area (existing a problem because now the |tructure 175 ft.). If structure 648 sq. ft., proposed - ^28 sq- • the workshop, is not to be attached, then it ® based on the lots location S. StMck <o= «» «“*S “ ^SuTrSr,S";a on .1.. i. for small workshop area. Staff recommendation: £ o/qait-Tons to house and detached garage to approve setback fy. nnhrrt Tupssp based im-the jHdr it^im-utrygaryi iTdditiohai nararrmn ■■ following findings: 2. Location of house and other improvements on lot 3. Location of retaining wall in street yard This approval is subject to the following conditions: • t-hP lakeshore yard on the south side may not exceed 1. The extension into the lake o y the substandard setback of 5.5 4te«e>val cr±r eitliej. 3. Turnaround provided on site cutC b'Aa.>li 4. Firewall construction on north side of detached garage fx;r 5. No future variances granted to this property for several years, tation and the rage are a result n relation to The enclosure »blem for the :act that the I - note, the letter lension into the [I for the Carlson 1 along the front of and open deck construct a t with an open cshop becomes . in area (existing t.). If structure the workshop, e lots location ite is necessary, increased in size I detached garage sqo hased on-±he side may not exceed fv^i hardcover arage per* • w mm .C mm .■V - ^ I ..-m K> CM M • Ulo o •-^xo Q. lU r UJ •-tn >•in zr H r cna Mo -iu.z in M tt UJ>• z oc o UJa >- o HsUla. V o z Ma UJ i Oo K» -I <m o. ►- CM UJ • >•> a c ^ M Ul I 5!Io CM O I M>^ U. I 40 to ro o Ul I UJu. M K» Oo CM mam CM UJ I >- >> o ^ HI -J I CM M> m CO UJ ^ n CO m < ro o “> a CM M -J ^ U < Hm o UJ CM U• m (9^ z^ u < I O UJ CM ^ >- CM oc CO m <m o r UJtt r oo z < Cka u o z a: :c a c mmm COoooo csl oo S' UJ o z X u. u < ^ ^ Z lU I- Z M O< o a. a X M UJ lii H H Z ^ < Z X >- h- Ui O II. Z Z Z M Ui ^ h- (O UJ cr UJ X V UJ a: H C u o.UJ u. u. M q: o o mm II '!• I? K.Oy. L (Ae^s C.l^c£j> LoT Iz, A • 7/ Ur( Ctd y'1 Oci. ^ 5* b A / .'^^' Ic.^- djLC./? Jxj //t/cc-' /- 7 ..--------- t/J,Jdj. y 2£^ “ "9 9 C f sZ 5^ ' 7f ' #772 W ^ 0 CATC Us. (5-/^3 ^ Ct^ec(is, ^ ^ o if. idC • ^> Cc (/-Ol fl <J-^4-^ 9< jt 'iPc evonj / b b cLc-C ^ ’Ja I C Ctr‘-Ct^5E?^ ^-v]/// 3 sf >95^0 3 h ' >, P ^ ' • •;£>*^ c : c'.et.^: =. ?;r. 4%I /^tA .; c, ^c—2 K =i = &5.-. ^ /c *1/1' (■ h iT<:><?>5. .^. ( " “ll '. \< .- c.>v y /C 5<* ^ - •' 7-.' <v.'ft *. [^■T^ y #•3 QO . ^’'' •■xo~H i 3.F.^ /7, ^ COaXlc 6-aJ^to < 3C 5 (^O T • • '2.H 0 i |».-- y ..I' A a 7y/ ^^ « ii 2 8 Z9 3 6 ''/C • r r V* *- zi.9 % .'(’ C ,• t> .' 1 1 V yo A Z2-YS'O SH f ^- yc c 6*^ C->T. / ^ - : •-'■ -' ' GdoiQcit-^ ^0£SS^ t Ci «^/i aJti p07C /Mp££iU&^/^>ufs tfih/A. ^ ^A6^j^<wr T^ l^l/OAASryi^ a [i©liDW(i AU6-8ige3 i/Ht/A ^jasr~ '^L^- z-A&t/ ) '■ ■ •'^'..r' *'■' *• l!^'-s^'':V 'IP* u ■: ’ * j .r f :: i| Ikli'w ■4 'm .•■*S' 'V «?■f. m IM'.a. : ^.< Ul- ^■- ■ .^.v * O-iltAiiuuc : ■. fil: d((‘Ajt.<>-4Ju dfifiUceil-aij 'LIu.ujj 'kul ib yuJdL4i^ kJ 'MjMy -410 4o yM' ^ TlU/). s 'M '4^ f tX^dj ^4lO ^^^cdiOTio ’fx> '/Ail M'&.fucui'XQjxc '^isu^ ■ <r2L/vC ■3 dmt> CuvdijL i@[lDW(l AU6-8BB3 CITYOFORONO iy) ' / ‘‘X M.* '-'"mi--' <j<-y ?i po (Sa p c-c ^o-^ss€ poc QA^i (0 *-! "fT3/Z-^ 66'j-£CTtdco "^0 Mt. 6M€-<?.rc60 Tb •S'c^^ BT*' BT^ i ■SCTf^/lci/^^^S^ ^0Uj*tPr>t/ X 'JJovc'ti *^<-K€. -hsu^At^^ ('6fk A '^'JT*-'^ (^-a«ca<3^ (^■C'p’of-e.^. K^pr >x Y pft r!>c pa4/«-i^<' / T T-C/ Ct TSC jO ^-l/tXLCi. £1TY OF QRONn ,A.' v:' ^v-.‘:t^\>: • .*• V'Vir#^ .'^ :t<^ ^ ri;c MMm 'S'MW Wm filJSsr^.ajf . t»•. .^fe;V--^!''. • • ,.' '.' ^f. ;■ ‘. ‘•* : >1 Vt>‘ j ' * ••-i i:i-.i-.ST<#.«A4;e » / •' » V. •- »U0«i *. • A*.. X *.>vi; V # •-. ' ^ g- • ^ *•» I •* «•»; ►• Mi •;.i • • •♦•^eI ' -A f • y^vr,v> VV';'.':-- i‘ ^Jt^ivrv- -'-v n-■ -i-c :,Vr/.'.-‘^‘-^j :•. '. . <.••..'•■ • •• TV ’ x v ' .*: i'-/. ••.'riVi-/?' xi^‘*'-j -r 7 - i*' rVi' -/•<• 1^*4- •* #. ^ \r: IX :. m ’ A*rr*) ’* r* * -i . "i " » M*; ■- '• *’« •7‘vTv;j ' 1 - J V" ^ «** * /l 1 »»•;:• • *-.'vv A * > • »viw-:?.* ; . V: ■ - LtjU^ ."V'? - T.i;, .-^* .* V m j • VA '- Vi...*.'» f . •». I » • ■*' r'^li-■ ^ *; ' I vk '.V;.;’.:,' yu’fr.-.-'.U'- ,.'/v • i-;>r • ^’. : • »*. * '.»•_ . arCN pacK ^>v*.••: o.. *• vKf ' • * * ■ * •-• «*^ “'t* 'f..;'• •••. • • f ■ .*v.-• .,• I • ’ -t • 1. • * •* 4. . »;'ts fi*. .I**-' .••“ • V- • V'‘ ', •. ♦ \ t- >.*•.. *• ^ ^ ' • •. ■ * • ••'i. !i*>' ^* ** ’ X ' ' *’ y •- ■ -R ^ ’ ’ ■ ' ■ • ‘ • - - ’ • * V- • .• ' ‘ ^ ■ » . .• ,» • -\ .1 !■ •. ? * *• Mbavc.• • : .*/ •I J‘ •> • *. / Oi f;^o .r \ . V. - * .9 «••»> »« ^ • •• 1* *•* • "• i •••••*■*••■• i • " J *' •• , « •. -s, ' V \ J **v ..V ' ..♦cfcA.MVM?***,.';................W______»i.... ...:V-.------Ji...............y. __________ ///^///kV./.y, >•’.•■/.r./f/j’/ \ r > “..■ . ■' • ■ i ■'■ ■ ■ V. . •?' . ■ _i ' ■*.;i,9I.O. - -90.0 89.9 II }:yy/yWc' // /'Vvv.^ . ' s -i .* •''V r-" J** • ?r \ •» 8t.o.,y.y I % ^ '•>•'••• 'i- •>L-UeCjsi‘I:Ar .■ y'.** * ' • A •• ; ‘B ^ mi \'K *\ • .‘V A ■ V.VA :r rv LAWN ®1 ,S«-e 'A* , • -.•>•:• .. ./ A • * \K~J.VS^1Z1. : I . H '■* '**• A * •*'' ^ Sit ?%| • t 9ST.O •; .1 : .1 : *:v • »'• • •.'I. • •- V ^ . • ••. . • ^ _ I ; • '*. ' t *’/• • I ^ • ••* : .5 •. • •. # #___1 w • » » I ------------- I f•» ^ \ .• ■ • * f •<, ' r ' • * * •’ ** A*• .A MK-I r.iTY Of OROMfl #• A.- » •i >*' X ■•• ii Voo4«, •tc.o . •. • • , . V'.t.• .••■' '-' .y7;; •■!• ••• ‘ -■•.:,v : ;<‘^j .V’ •• ;. H r-r .v.v| \ ; v*^ . ~*'i * r A -*v k . • . I ;. • •* ♦ A ;. ri * • • • .* « ■ *R ’ I 4 it" I ''‘.•s; -I ':''7-i .'fm r ■.' •■:.* i:r ■■ ■ •• ' Mta*-m ■■ , '.W>;ir.... L,-*:,:;;:.^£;i I .m' • ■ J» • N..> -i*/ • ./iV* •.. •• • •• A. T v ji.O •,*••• ■ ‘V ’ 1Vv *; * S• 5«- •.. t .*•.♦•• f •. • • w-r • • • , .* ;*• •• iH>44*^ • . .. •.•. y? •• ■ .*♦:o- Y-. '• ; .• *• • • •/*.. *‘ OuD (§> Oi^ ♦-I • •* • . ♦ • *, .V- * V.- *^ • ^ i.* ;/•,.K>'.: - tMT«.> \ I K* ‘t t.iir' JO-v ’- '-. . . • •'• I . r .-.V t . I . .1 I I • » I 1 Jp . • * •. . . • » i • I •-“ ■•, ’ ^ •• I ; . • ••V V •• •* •• •«. . •• • / • 1 •• *»^ •* ^ •!% . *. , A /•» . 5 • • V. . ■ m^rnm » • >•« • ». • « • ^ • •• St.o.,..‘‘ I . . /• p'"■ff H . .. «».o I *A* , •4.0 •rf . »? r- I • «•' • 1^ •| •H* • * «•; t 4’ * • •., • , I ^ . •. ..» J •;. •'. • •* * I • • •• »r , r ■ - • ’ I J I I • I I firi •>-■$■ t' :;= 'V •. •.'i i: • / m iJ'/- l^v •••«•;■%•» , ' t . •• .■■;•■ * •»••• 'f-- • •• , «••••« M •••% • «••••• •» • ■ »-• • t .•*.•.y v v,A. A' • • ■ .• . V • Mp. •*. :S • • * • k 4*.*> ’.'J > * •* .5 ... •(f *t •*« • - ; OuOs(S> 1 I1 ***OuD t - M « «••• \ UJoeO '96.C.U. ev*£^ iA«eMeMT x.er>i« » •• • • »!♦. . •* ’• • • • • • ■• • • .*•• • .•.«-•••••• —•* » I •• • •« ■ •• • •• •••I -1; •...» 4 . ; Vi ^ • * •*'. ‘ • * •'* ! I Mr■^.Spr 5v, l4 **• 'I *.* •* .*• •%. V *• . • i Tzr 0 X. ‘ ■ w.*-^l .-■ - L"'. '• *4 >4<• \(,«TCH4»< \. Z=JX r O' 1 » 4*I"-I I Ia LW*M(4 Room UPPER FtOOt». VU^M V " . I * « '•4. « 1*0 Snclo ^c. peiACM 0} L- ?> U>*ot> 94CR evci4 t ’ ■ ^ \JTpe%. Hi i5- I :; ■ 'Sv-.j'l tsiafti S» f:.-; ■ .J-C If. rr‘ir*Xv''H- • ■. * I ♦ I ' 'i- r H ath f *1 • • ^ ti:, • » , . *t . * ; -• . rV. * * * f- . V- . w » V;* 4 THIfP'. MUDY • • . . *. . r- •••, 4 . *:' 1* *• j •• •4;’ ?5V«-. * 4* i% •. CQ t ' w* « -•mm • - * -• • ■j:v, ”V i f-y\ m m:: S V.S15; ■V' > • I .'H .* A . • . ■■■77 ♦ . • * ♦ • • •.• • ; •. •• fU w' i^f/^ I .w*"* ........... • * ' • I o &ff DK ? *• /- MVr: Lowet FLOon. Plan ^". r-o" * r :*. A \. I NIC S.- i\- f. !i e « < ♦ .,*v. • 9 ;;i6 *••1 .* » ^ • ». *• / • y* ■V, ♦ If A*. . ecf.1. V Of (4»ep TO: FROM; DATE: SUBJECT; Zoning Di: Applicatic List of E: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K I have re\ together t The transj for your 1 transitior been consi Charles Ma a conditic 1983 revie applicant, property c Zuckman pi Maciosek. concerning The applic subject to future dat possible d major stru UiAjui * • .■ I -= - X I <*} •’ • ;? > i ■ i . •'* I ‘ ♦. 4 •/ -.• --I’* . (LCf*«k * V e* -Ik »«p TO; FROM: DATE: Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator August 11, 1983 SUBJECT;#773 - Richard Zuckman - 3995 North Shore Drive - Conditional Use Permit Zoning District - LR-lC Application - Conditional use permit to continue legal non-conforming use - Sandy Beach Shores under new ownership and to formally approve change from seasonal rental to year-round rental List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Application Plat Map Property Owners List Sketch/site plan of property Questionnaire - permit application - 1968 Conditional Use Permit - September 9, 1968 Application for building permit - July 10, 1969 Memo - Building Inspector - July 10, 1969 Memo - Building Inspector - July 28, 1969 Council Meeting - August 25, 1969 Memo - Building Inspector - September 29, 1971 I have reviewed the address file for the subject property in order to piece together the transition of the seasonal resort to year-round rental units. The transitition was completed sometime in 1971 and the exhibits selected for your review would suggest that the City was fully aware of that transition. Clearly, this change, if it were to occur today, would have been considered an expansion of a non-conforming use. Charles Maciosek, the current owner, was advised by the City to apply for a conditional use permit to continue the legal non-conforming use during the 1983 review for a joint use dock license for Sandy Beach Shores. The applicant, Mr. Zuckman, is in the process of negotiating the sale of the property contingent on obtaining the necessary conditional use permit. Zuckman plans to continue the gradual upgrading of the property as did Maciosek. He will rent all seven units. The City has received no complaints concerning the operation and use of the rental units. The applicant should be advised that the property is a non-conforming use and subject to all pertinent ordinances. He may also be advised, that at some future date, the City would look very favorably on a PRD application or possible duplex credit. The buildings are old and will very soon need major structural repairs to render them safe for habitation. #773 - R August 1 Page 2 Staff re to appro' to contii Shore Dr: 1. The \ non-< 2. The r of tl 3. Parkd on Nc 4. Boats prope Drive - Conditional >n-conforming use - to formally approve ental 169 ^ in order to piece mnd rental units, tpchibits selected ire of that ►day, would have City to apply for ming use during the Shores. The the sale of the il use permit, operty as did iceived no complaints >n-conforming use and .sed, that at some application or ^ery soon need .on. #773 - Richard Zuckman August 11, 1983 Page 2 Staff recommendations: to approve the conditional use permit application of H. Richard Zuckman to continue the non-conforming use of the property located at 3995 North Shore Drive subject to the following conditions: 1. The use of the property is subject to the standards setforth in the non-conforming use sections of the municipal code. 2. The multiple docks at 3995 North Shore Drive are for the exclusive use of the ..tenants/renters. 3. Parking of all cars must continue to be on the site and never permitted on North Shore Drive. 4. Boats in excess of 20' in length may not continue to be stored on the property based on the intense use of the one-acre site. Lchard Zuckman i at 3995 North itforth in the the exclusive use id never permitted ^ stored on the M ir-- > ^04 * mi rytyri W if I - 44.i: *•0/9^ 24.26 lies. 10(32^ • II ^35) • liaVll tki fff AVg r.z m ‘ JT k'i^ 17 18 19 (♦*r^ Csp ) »?557T 5 %.| T $t.s Mi ^•n t {locpa) fy)cri?b j. ___ '■' |r UO •» 'v " • V, 9y figoo)K l*17J5 fv • O' tT. 114 (3^5) 2 MAPLEG^ \ 1%' inzi ' i. ^ 28 vy5V V .j. V* i Jf s.:--. *1 =■■5. ■ tfl Z Z O < < kflo cn cn o 0 1^(0^ ly DCa Z oo 2 QC o o Z UJ < < >- \ o: < uj tL Ul tL x: o z X < a S < X CL O H oVfO li.1 0 q: oto X to (/) to X<M h- 1 o:o 2 • CO O CO a* CO CO to to o ui a. M tt 2 O •C UI q: o CO O o to 2 2 X iri M M U) lA iix < < K d: d: ac 2 CO CD o r a a o UI UI CO 2 CO CO O' 3 O O cO O □c a to X lAto toto toCM IK I CO COto CO CO MD tt q: to uj UI in to CD lA g§5! Qc o: CD Ui Ui ^ < < CO CO K o q; 2 tooo CO o O UI o q: O to X to %n to X CM t- rig -* z a tt Ui Uio oM M lU Ui ^ 2 X X u u %n lA u. u.I CO O O (A <A rs. Ui UI^ r 2 co to < < to o 1 1 Ui tt o O to X lA <A lA a DCh o to 2 N Ooo Ui 0 q: oto X to 4A to X CM K 1 a r- o ^ 2 I COo o lACK CO to to o lA lA < < 3 3M M ^ *J (D CD 2 2 UiuM 2 < ttO UIcro X(A oto lA ^ <CL o 2 O Ui o ^ < < I CO 151 q: 3 UI Ui •J -J < < CO CO gi CD tt 2 ^ 2 O CD < ^ 2 -J I tt CACO tt M O lA Ui H -j I- _ lA -i O ^ CO M o r** to o 2 CA ^ ttos Ui 2 § o tt o 111 ^ tt r o o < q: D tt 2 o < tt IM >- \ LiJ D ^ UJ ^ < >- \ ffW IaI D Z UI *< >• tt 2 IK ^ UJ a UI CL 2 O ^ ^ -* **CL UI CL **ir < Z t- tt 3 < 2 CL O H O Z Xsi;! i 1 i ) i tt o o o 2 to o: to < oCA to XCM ►- I tt UJ ^ > ^ M to Ui tt lA CO O lA < X 2 tt tt O Ui :ito CA to XCM h- I tt l:§§ lA lA Htt UIo tto o Ui 2 § < Z -i ^ O O H _ _ Ui Ui X < X ^ CO CO 2 a tt^ u o O O UI O CD M o 2 C^ H O lA 2 lA O c^ < tt lA 3 < C^ tt CO to H O CM Ui “0 to o to o CA CD ^ Z ^ tt Q* O O Ui O*to ... ... ^to > lO < u 3 O X O to X o ^o to CO CO M)to 10 CO o to Ui Ui •o to CA O liitott tt to tt tt to Ui O M to tt tt tolAtoUJ UI CA to Ui UJ CA to M < 2 >lA to X tt CD O (AlACMCD CD <^ lA CM CD CD <^ lA S CO M lA CM H Ui H X lA1G 9 1 O O CM 1 2 »r. rJ o I tt H CA CA ttM _j ^ ^ Q CA Ui X ^ 2 O 3 Ko I CO ^ o o CO >* _ O' tt M CO O CO to < X c^ q:to o CD 5. to o ttoo CLo g ^ o2 Ui < > N tt < UI Ui CL 2 O H q:o* o oO Ui°g s CM X tt toCM CA t- O CA CA lAto X M H tiJ CM H D CA tt Qf M O ^ tt P X Z UI r- ^ CD tt 1 UI o < CO <2 u. tf> X KO O UJ M O lA «< K O tt o 2 O Ui Ui iA N CA M o D CO -i -J lA O cO to < < CO < to €» < CO ^ 2 lO o o O to X to < ott t- CA O o Ui tt _ _ _ _-I Uito tt o > ^ to < CA < M %0_ tt CA tt to to X Ui Ui o lA CM I- O tt CA I tt 2 Ui 2 O < H tt ^ 2 _ < _ * Q £CO K 2 2 O O tt o o e Ui K O 2 lA CD ^ 5 O O < lA O to O tt O ^ 2 CM to to to CM I H CL Q Ui 2O 5 7 3 Q O 2 Ui I CO COto lu O b o< tt h- O CA CO lA lA tt 2§ h- UJ X ^ CO M M lA lA 3 CM Ui 2 tt 2 CL O g < tt o2 lAl < _ \ tt < Ui UI CL 2 2 X < r DE ^ O O lAJ g CM CM K in M 2: lu 9^ ac in o lA h- UJ to q: M o ID IN lA O C^ CO lA < K> O O 14. |4J q: UJ o < O Z h- Ul lA Kl J O >• N> ft H «A O O UJ ft _______-J UJ lA d: o > ^ lA < lA < M ^ _ ft 10 ft K> PA X UJ Ul O lA CM P- O ft lA I ft Z UJ C N O < ►- ft ^ g ^ ^ O g UJ UJ ^ PA X M CM P- H bLA* O M ^ Z ft _ ft ^ M O PA •- I lA <0 (O lA M ft X N •-« lA U. CM C^ •9 to in PA o .J “if s iZ CM O >> ft -J PA 3 'Doo CM CM PA CM I IA* UJzM P- 10 M fei UJa X §5< u. Ul ^ ft o O PA X lA lO lA CO PA •i UJ Bi CO ..i Q i PA Z CM 3c^ o PA X lAooo o UJ CM CM g X CO PA CM h*co M 8Agg Z Ul m . ® U. CA O UJ CA mJ SSS US > PH CA ft PA O lA h- UJ CO ft M o 3 X z CO ra ft Ul 00 < p- ty •j < lA N CA CO <PA 2 ftoo fto 22 ao ft ft ft UJ N UJc1^3 O CO CM M -I CM O < ^ A"PA O UJ CM U • Z ft N O O ^ U Z pH M P^ ft -H lA P- fs. M> UJ ►- CA CO PA ft lA O < lA Z M M O < ft ft S oO 1 Ul o < ^ U P-co < W lA N r >. < ^ < -A ^ 2 o -• I- o CO o CM PH CM O P- PA o u! CMUQ zo CO N o o ^ CJ z^ CJ zT 2 zo P- CA CO PA lA < lAM O ft°5 •H CA UJ PA p- CO ^ P- lA O CO u 6 O U P* ft < < lA N Z PA >•o «o <X «H 2 _ ft CA o o O UJ 0 ft O -J CM X < CM CO P- _ UJ PA X CM P- CD fJ.g2 1 UJ P* ^ CA CO CA CA O «0 PA PA O X ^ CO Ul CO UJ O > PA M < O fc lA 1“ UJ 2g PH i CO UJ ft «0 CO < •J X p^ ft U ^ X ftoa -< ft os UJ Z I4J >• ft < fto? UJ zx2 O H r exhibit CO =tfc oo X m p-oH F 1 pnj]oz §ooc CD o 1 u. 3 CM CM P- O CO o < CM PH CM O ft PA O CM U rl.g^ u UJ M U. ^ 35 Q•9 in Z M M -i I •H lA CO CO ^ PA O CO —• CA < PA •H lA -J -J Q lA X >• ft 2S8 §i ft ft ^UJ UJ CD CD O O ft UJ «C lA CO:S8 ft UJ Ul ft a 9 ft S ft O Z X ft o p~ ftoo < \ UJ r I HIBIT ■i ‘ .; • ’ T j ■ . >:;•• ■ ■V'.!;- * •. . t ‘ # U -V, BE5ga5S£55SSaBaagiT ivr ^ EXHIBIT £ Vili.A'ii; 01 OKONO QlHiSThlXA IIU-: V0>< l-.XI STI XC NON-CON FORM I N'o CON!)! T lONAI. USF I’iiRMIT Af’Pi, ( CA'i i Ninno of Cui-ii'.oss ctnd ovvner S/:^/Yrlij Mx.3r..BLS.^ Qi^ LjD^^c Of. d__ Robex't____k/9.r. LS. 5.€ Af._ Datc:_^^ llejQJLh _.8jS.5^^ Jt descr ip I i CJ1 and nddiCi's of iMoporty v.hcre business is coniiucted Cfrxi Ji £^X.n.t^cJ.jrL) .U.‘J^J»JaL MuPusy^ aiuASLTtti Ai ^e...th £ j-p A-ei~ 3 7c. '^lo frk -r/. .-V -ftp 'mA Date busincs s be __ STATUS QF nUSlNFSS ON MARCH 1!. 195? 1) Kii.it ’vas the nature of your busine.<s on this date flow many buildings of what type and size, and location were used for yoi.r business on this o.ate / A.4,au^. / AjbChx-^JLc/Yi l( 4 t_(k . J ^ £aJ.u^yu<yi How liiucii and what kind of equipment used for business on this date .MARCH 10, 190 7 11 What was the nature of your business on this date ■~k «•i-* * ^• * * 1 • f •• 1 •• ?* • 2)How ;i!any i>u i ] <.{ i n (js of what t>‘}‘":*, :Mzc, arul location were used for your • • business on this cl a: c~ .Jj^r^d[UJ2o^.AhM:t.CLh^ _________________________ .> I flow rnucii and whut kind of equipmeiit used For husincss on this date 4) Wiiat was the condition of buildings on this date jf there were^any additions to buildings, used for business I'etween .••larch 11, 19S" and March 10, 1968, please state date and size ____________________________ Please enclose plat of your property, showing location of all buildings and dimensions of that part of let and size of buildings being used for business pfjrposcs. Inclosed is a sample tITat may be us^d for this ourpose and guidance. Signed (ikdadJLhM Li (t^Ari\ mm. ■'L^0i^. • .,S. i.' Oife ■ 4:- t‘ • . •'’ # ■ • ■ ■ : mm x: <• j ‘•Oi*. 0* ’ Hfif* r*f) ^ 5 '\ i I ] . I j I >. i*".• J •:V- •'‘‘>.U- •* uscti for your t h i <a V c- 'etween > I buildings ig used for r this purpose uJ'f^pcisJ^ I a)^ 'M r / • . • t _____' A ' * 0 ’ t' T7 V >s i V !dSi‘ ^ C* ' \ *. •f EXHIBIT - L c V c , y \ t' tic i'e •. i J f -•' ’: ' \ r • \./* • 'IcJ f *•• . , ............. 9 r ^ t *1 ’ LcO' * \ •••fc «»• « .. I «l “ 'y*'" ^ 4' ! ^ ,. :x t'l t i •* I J « I 13 > ^■'*- iv ;. c. •if- ■•; •' !r; ®*WcrioN$i '• *»lt AODRiss f' ’' •. NUAtaca ✓- '<• OWNiK ■*^^'*CHiricf (No. o^ w6«ic—- CONST«UCr»< ^'NISH BASfMCNr I " ’ ^^uNsr«ocr«ON «ONr rA«o «00« area ^^^OKTlONMif, o /7 ACGBEGATg fi22* ^*fA ‘^^f^^'OWLEDCMEs ‘»c«>rdji,cc «V/ ;r" ®cnatu «e [4 •T ‘•• ::.r >. .. j ^IBIT . • •• • • • •> £?' 9 ?'41*;. «V *•- I > 4' f /. /: i i 1^ i ho-'O^i p». ■ T X:. ' *'•..*■ r - ' ■ ■ iSS-* F ».. f- w'm I; ;: ----------------------------------------- of ohono '^CNAiry fff ^OMl fgg ^ z 1 I ■'r-V.^- .. '.» -*ai ^ f»»c ZONf ^lAr NOAtiic^ '<OWN«------- /-/■'^w« 'wjTir r^- ^*CHiri^ i«r0oiiocn' (Nom#)(^•'- NoJ (Addreii) NE'V CONSTRUCTION D ..............- «NISH SASCMfkir n Q ___AoomoNQ llZf or.,..-:—^ °^»ACCO _ --------------_ ^ WSIOC o sroBicc " ■ No*)' *'*^CCS »E0 *^ACES ON ^UN. ' —- _______ ---------------^r! . I sro«ifs ~---------------------I "• '*0'»Tr oTMtNiSiii pr;;55;77sr--^ •'• ftONr YAiio ~'~----------------- >«• »M« r^j^~ -- I *0. csr»AiArco cosr ^'f^lSH ATTIC O ^»SC. lOA0lNC~ii;j^5 NU mbeb Eeq. '^‘^mbeb ebovioeo 5'^C Of C4C„ '^- NO. Of Mm7ue^ mT* ;------ s «f ^ppli(obU) in.so <* f~i c ^L Ci / i5:_Er_^ *’• S'OE yABoV'*' — -^' __fr «) „ -------—-i.*.* Jtt C. r V 7^.- --r:------f. a OCCUPANTS SCATS. MArMiAT7,j- 50H TESTS □ ^'•^I'C^riON CUING IOCS Q '■“"‘‘"'CS c „,5 SUCVET _ ° COPIES °C STPEETi 0» CROWN ..' V , r'"' J mm A^MOVEo mmmmmi ll« r* - *•■ [:4! If :. “3 y.^^V--::^:-- /•. KM3 .*• ..* * .*•'v m--'.'ii .'■• ••• :• ‘' ■■■ -m s, ■ # -7*:- A ^<'.- r-'; TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Robert 2 Parcel J a 20*X i He plan! and rooj The sta‘ This is There wi to any AdmiTilstrator FROM: DATE:July 10, 1969 SUBJECT:Reconstruction This is a legal non-conforming use. exhibit - ZacK's Resort - 3995 North Shore Drive a 20'X 58* building now partially torn down. an/io"o£.-"°The%Sudirg ^oild SridenUca? 'trpresent"bil?ding. The stated use for this is a recreation room and storage. There would have to be emphasis that this building could not be put to any rental use as a cottage or other rentals. I was the b has d talk size this hoTe Drive ore Drive, to reconstruct two walls ‘sent building. not be put exhibit TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Administrator Inspector July 28, 1969 Zak's Resort - Restoration nrt today to check f“*'6*'?^,,°"state^the^building 1 was over the^wi®*' to restore, ^akariason wishes to •,!,K SrS-ul.!--"'""'"* MINUTES Stubbs 1 the Agn as draw] Larson < Searles request Tracts prelimi for a s to subm approva Butterf Franzel request Avenue, additio to the Motion, Butter! the rec North 5 for a t 20*X St the prc being i not rei Motion voting Franze emp 1 oyi accoun approv Franze the Pa member Nays ( Searle recomm repair rewiri at an the Ad alterr appro\ remains of the building wishes to he same ;back. Again, MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING HELD AUGUST 25, Stubbs moved, Searles seconded, to approve the Agreement, in settlement of the lawsuit as drawn by the Attornies in the Norman Larson case. Motion, Ayes (5) * Nays (0). Searles moved, Franzel seconded, that the request of Charles Cox for a division of Tracts W ^ X, R.L.S. 461, be granted preliminary approval with a 50* easement for a street and 100* turnaround, subject to submitting a plat prior to final approval. Motion, Ayes (4) ■ Nays (0). Butterfield abstaining. Franzel moved, Searles seconded, that th request of Gordon Nelson, 1310 Elmwood Avenue, for a variance to construct an additional bedroom be approved and referral to the Planning Commission be waived. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Butterfield moved, Franzel seconded, that the request of Robert Zakariason, 3005 North Shore Drive, owner of Zak*s Resort, for a building permit to reconstruct a 20*X 58* building with a 10* setback from the property line, subject to the building being used for recreation and storage and not rented as a cottage, be approved. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (1). Stubbs voting Nay. Franzel moved, Searles seconded, that the employment of Virginia Gonyea, part-time account clerk, at $2.00 per hour, be approved. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). exhibit — 1969 Pag® 2 Franzel moved, Butterfield seconded, that the Park Commission be expanded from rive members to seven members. Motion, Ayes (5) Nays (0). Searles moved, Franzel recommendations of the repairs to the Village rewiring, redecoratihg at an estimated cost of the Administrator using alternatives in wiring approved. Motion, Ayes seconded, that the Administrator for Office, including and new floor covering $1,500, subject to his judgment on and carpeting, be (5) - Nays (0). AGREEMENT l^orman Larson PRELIMINARY APPROVAL DIVISION R.L.S. 461 VARIANCE 1310 Elmwood Avenue BUILDING PERMIT 3995 North Shore Drive EMPLOYMENT Part-Time Account Clerk PARK COMMISSION SPECIAL APPROPRIATI9N Village Office Repairs I - VI. t k ■ • V mm V . TO; FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Zack*s R they ran faciliti house”, unit cha placed f one more they say cost of faciliti laundry The reso making a there sc the asse Chapter human ha one lava We are j ilBIT Page 2 ENT Larson INARY APPROVAL ON 461 4CE Elmwood Avenue ING PERMIT North Shore Drive )YMENT •Time Account Clerk COMMISSION lAL APPROPRIATI9N age Office Repairs m 1 TO- k n : y- I' I- ' ft EXHIBIT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Administrator Inspector September 29, 1971 Zacks Resort Status Zack's Resort was originally assessed three unit charges. In 1968, they ran sewer into their porperty. Some of the cabins had sanitary facilities, and some used the facilities under what is labeled main house**. An agreement was reached whereby they were to be assessed the unit charges as they placed facilities in the cabins. In 1968, they placed facilities in one more cabin and were assessed And paid for one more unit. Now all the units have facilities but cabin one, which they say is only rented on a seasonal basis and does not warrant tne cost of a sanitary facilities installation. Cabin one now uses the facilities under what is labeled **main house*'. All cabins use the laundry facilities under the same. The resolution as drawn up askes for an assessment of three more units making a total of seven--four being paid for. The Zachariasons feel there sould only be two more unit charges and cabin one absolved from the assessment. Chapter 1 of the State Plumbing Code states that any premises for human habitation shall have a water source and at least one toilet, one lavatory, one kitchen type sink and one bathtub or shower. We are presently charging for seven usage units. In 1968, ad sanitary • eled "main ! assessed the i 1968, they I paid for >in one, which warrant the )w uses the use the ree more units riasons feel absolved from am mises for one toilet, hower. TO:Planning Commission FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE: SUBJECT; August 11/ 1983 ,774 John Allenburg, 865 Partenwood Road - Variance Zoning District - LR-IB Area - 1 acre setback Variance - Lakeshore Application; Fast shore ^ Required— 75* Existing = 44'^ Proposed •=■ 39 P '.i#'Variance or 48% south Shore Required * 75’ Existing = 82’ Proposed =65’ Variance = 10 or 13% Hardcover Increase within 0-75• Protected Area Allowed =0 ^ Existing = 5,076 sf Proposed = 5,652 sf Increase in Hardcover = 576 sf The City approved the plat f/^^enwood^in the and with that approval Uhcapable of being built on by water on all three sides ^he City approved several without approval of to build the existing varLnces in 1975 for Mr with the City on the structure and was . Applicant has maintained the location of the access drive. ^PP ^^^e owner has made a crushed rock drive at staff s teq • residence - if substantial financial he has maintained the inspect the ®ite, note - all that exists Tsrp^rrverirrigrna^^fpplication in 1975. ^ • _ ^ ^ was Cipt»i'-'vr=vA -- - - -- The applicant requires ®'?‘*^^J;°''®3rage^and^build on attached expand living atea to ®^®“ng g ^9 locate a "''raa^ ^Any^UproveLn? to the existing structure would ?equir4 harLovL or setback variances. #774 J Varian Page 2 To ap] withi! of a based '.V ■' . IV* • Variance 60’s t surrounded Jilt on roved several sting ity on the ned the s made a if you led the it exists plans to attached locate a would rm t H- ■<r ■ V ff r 1 i li-': ■‘St' T * ► 4 ,• : ■ i} j? mM ti ' ’<4 r i. #774 John Allenburg Variance Page 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO approve setback variances and a based on the following findings. 1 - The lot is a peninsula 2 - The lot is not wide enough to meet the required setbacks from the lakeshore. aa aa ft building site after lakeshore Thi. .Pfrov.1 1. B110.1M Bbaltl**' X - City will not approve future variances that will require increase in hardcover. < a aQ. a M m>4 kH 2TI z lA OO lA <A CO •« cr ID O < fO O U U '.V-' ^ ■» ' 576 sf iition Llenburg backs hore squire d rock - ^;v| =M f -A. -Ml H. b" I .. ' i V 4- V kS-*- O inKi m Ma. o h* K O CL Ui q: UJo < OL r IM h-in >-in M I- r q: in M o & z M CL UJ i UJ in CO in CM fA Q o QC oo o o KI O ^ 3 in lAo in on in tA UJ CM H flSa^ a CL -4 M I zino in cA CLa M oo oc < CL UJ < CO «c CO o KI O U DC < U 2s O § § CM Oo o CL OO O:s5 UJ Xu.KI O CL z in KI UI •J < •-I CL UJ UJ o ^ -1 o 5 UJ oCM h- < CL Z CL O -J D Z UJ ^ CL < UI CL >•*i4 •« -J K O H 1 CL CL CL in ^Up •« < CL UI o in CL CL M) z z oin KIo in in UJ < oCO X X in z CO o o o M> o KI O -> -1 CO -J ^ o o QC o UJ 3 “) UJ -> UJ UI M> in KI ^ CL I in Ui UJ 53 O UI UI CL 8S€ UJ UI UI UI j5^o<< o ^ -i O z to a <0 -I ooo KIoo s?O'•X O jr5 (S'-J a H<CD < H O ooo CLn o -1 o in ^ 2: zKI O Z CL in KI o osr 3 < z ^ H H o z UJ < n h- CL CL ^3* KI UI “1 UJ O KI lA UJ UJ 'J- CM h- 1 O Z CM U -J in 1 CL Ml Z E 1 X -1 ^in < Ml z O D Du. u. u. O O o KI ino o in in O UI UIr E CO KI < < KI o -i n X E o CO CA s a E UI CL M CL KI CL E O CL E O o O < CL O O < CL OoQ Z UJ <O Z UJ << >- szCL < UJ CL < luua UI CL r CL UJ a EH < O Z X <a z < z a o H O Z X <ca S < z CD a o 1- 5^ % ......IA) Vr V rv /• lU H • # f ’ ll . t r .,4 ; . • •« J. . *t •• ^ » r,T'’ 1/:-V. \ ^.,: v=:rv5A:;:';■;:v:' , fe'-■ ■' •. •■•'- y.. .^;-. ,:y, . .y , ■ :-'i .;^ vd •.f^gglSKaJOl /gg- .emvAf 7M^:x-'5;wsr,,.iW» I! / 7. ’V^ ,^r- 1/^1 .%• trmm ^ ■_r- // ‘r ✓ t i fiiseJtr^i^'I >, *.i\y •\U...r ftTL If PtttPMtD B y ^CMOetL St Mad ^om. Imc. €fiQjN€£QS Sf/fl^ /OPS PLAMI^if^ tOe*TM< v«3 v<c • • \ 1,. ‘-VV.,^ :v:^>ws^r: ■'i^- -if / M, •*« •»*«<, >«a>^ t9 ^Mt -» »• c «*««•'« •• (r« o <-'^ ••<■• fm-»-W-»*^» »«r^[« •>• «r ».•/••. • ».r^ ^ ••.< *»>♦'-— m «MT<» e# »^. « «« ImM V »• to ^ 'Me'to*!. ,f» • ««•'*'« j# Amh • af f^.-w toM* ^ • »f—>■<•<1 to>.4a- • «KMr«* ■<# »#•.•' *«M, to v« ^-•toto't, »^«to»w rto, l*<to .%. *-• . tf M iMc'totoi *«• '*toi<»-toto ••-. »4l#ti. to*v:* sMtoe*^. 1*va« .• •• - »•* *lto *«»•• *.k« :* , ----------r''’—** I.LM ?*!..!»»•.• • to-M. tt'to. . .toM* to. ..-»^ •C'^zr : .^z:::::: :::::n. -to' f« •-%-» tototo •,. »»#^to toto <to»*to to •'»••. *> *u <•>■• *to«f •1 ttoto wto-» • «tora -a I ■*»■*»»• ■: •■m - *m . M-•>•-••-•• •oav*. « T**« *. toto to1 •a^rtoto ’* to '• , »-to* to-* Oitoto*>Btol •to* t*to 0 .toll • • to* toto <• ».-tof *•-• f .-toto weto-•••.. . -to ‘ toto to»to » t»to »wto« •;•<-•* to*-*. to* ato«i *Mto J* - v-tototo to.tor^ <• to*to1 •-• totot*, toto*totoM:. *.* g'-toto-<« tor »W toitoto to> »« «MI «4» 4* -<>tototoi * »• * -'to to* «*•■*. *» toto «•« a-to « tototo.* •***» to« '-«•* ^ -< »• ( «to, «to i ^ i *«» •**«-*«*« '.«*«• * m Tto*.-. to to tov i ''lP«nr ■ **• C«to<—to*w— « tow to*« -* I :X f' 3 PnCLIMMARY PUT AND PROPOSS) REZONMQ FOR LONG LAKE WOODS 4i?" Own«r SM mv S2;Lo«i» Park. MhMk •fO - •••• PrtpM By BelioM A Madaon. Ine.. Ifi9ifi««rt 8urv«yof» Ptmntm§ Noplilfis Location Ma|» Ha Scaia fM loeW *«p. • T*«i aara «p *•» W.*a. •*, f . ::7r-r.:i' -: ^ r .r.z irrr. '.r:;*!:-::; •jirrr..-rn»r- *. r,-vr» 40 rnm.y tmm* *: •* rJ ^ ^ •a* • •«aa>«<i •> •» «►'* »• <aa>'««r •»«»•• aa. ♦ ••• •• "*■•»■—« --r^ Omi •* •• ri r ~ v^« • •• "mm Hr« ..* *•,« • 00 0 9^ •pt •««* • —n a* •«..«. tM • aM» # ,#» •. ^ .. ,1,*. . <* »« iMa «• • >P 1^. » *wn, t «a^«M «• * k* -«<* , I M • »M* . 1» <M «r • aM.a *9*«Ma>.. * .Mk JM» • • «ai < > • > a n«a «*.« > tM* *«•' •>• '«>»•«• «• »*,• pf , ^ >«•.«• aiM.. a»a .» 0,^000 ^ -«Ma» op ^ 0 00*0 9m 0rn» aa ««|», I. . - mp 00f % »-«*« 0p » ■• «»^ * •«• *» -00-1 -4^-^t tmm 0 » Iirw, • . T •• *«• ^ » RT» Ha* » •« *RP*^R ' -♦ • IM ^ . aa,,M, «. 909,00 0- mimppm 00 ». •■• CM « •« x* .^. - RM «# i «•••'*-•'•» •* •■• -Haa-iM »»V« «'M .«t>» -» *, • »» w.*^ Rm. *• m00i i00 0 *004 •*« mmp ^ »• P m a RM^a ^ M.»a taaa. . a^aa •♦ »♦ a..^.« AM a m049>40 0* p».. » «m. to Va m • a» a»toto > «a« « .*-aa 90-4 000 09 •« ^ririto^!n^"!ria ’rL.i •aTa'i rr'%2*' ■« toto • a» »Ra XtoRto ••R» to«t aP to* • « • m 0mm »0I 990 K0» 0 -w * 9H9 m 9f i000 » 040 0 > 4 *004 04 9 t > *aaa to .Ma 4 p* *000 0- ^ 3i:c :5 :;2 «»warT*L'r ~ ’ »• ; raaa IHM ^ to. >«H -* »• to.*, to* MtotoR. *Rr*-*--to, »toa to a a toMt to •« -to • • to. a • to toMO •». »«»«• toto • M to.toto'p to • toto .to*a aa • 4^’ v^t-rr-t-r- -,7-Jiir-— to-to Ito toto* Ctoto Mto to •« • I Pto, to aato aato Hato to «»« ( Ra«*i vtoiM ‘to-'to 4 a Ma. to* a ar «*a*. a , to •* aaaa •*• .0 mm *9 ^ 11 to a* u* a a* 4 *a 09* *094 V ^ ' ,.r^1 ..XI t CD f 9M O i Tv c5? i ! vs. S| ... 1 . i V ■•. ■ ... 7—T-- • . : i 1 ' •»••■«»•« W*m * • ----------- A' ■i r I'i D1 • »M x«# tH«^\L ■^=*V*^S5v i> sn Ti!i•r i; //..-•• • / \ V / ; • i ^ ] .- * . dH ; vv- ''U’:i ' !^.i ' ' : '■ -; ----fj~~ ~T'J f 1 \ • AV - «l‘ ' VV-" \ -1 » \ '■ '•% y- • T/'. \ S .I;.-.;.__4'—'-..; i i\ i:-’ ff! ,ii";;i I'l: hi ! f M<«nt I|t I nnin ^ } m 1 i* j&u ' P#» ?:*!-■ i Tt;:^ I ;—T •>«i •• » <m mt i r ill|i if.!!•i| t # , 1 .1 ? • r fl. ■> i.i J r iRi'Hp• ♦ M I f L n !i J.^ ! - t| h 0‘ii ^.‘j >" ■ h"— k —^ I #l/ , _. lilt • ’ !—i,'} '•■. ‘j^i."' t-k i"? .1.'rts r I * i ‘! !»• •*' » M ='r^l jl! iilil'i ihft' iVr i!*!i i:? •:i^ 'i!i I f 3 l *'* ir- f? -< »-»t ««->•* •r^ ^ «»««•* I / I 4 *■■ ■ I < # r LLZI-JiJ-i ” ' r' jr-f '^■4 i: ■ S9 M ll III! '--\ia ii- f \\! * i5ji' H ' * 'I I H Ijcr::ma ‘ ^ ^ . ^Jr l 1 m ____^ ^m-*7t7 afct/» ----- TO^OSMPMielsumtfer ron _jm •- ¥ >•»•-.-« ■ ■■■ \ r: • tt ■■'■ ^-rr- if ■;■- * V ^ . i _ ____. |«|» N.«i! * -’*''**■ • <r* j< '* * ~’V* , % •-S%;^»\'«••• ■' ’>^V V‘ P70jM '■XiiihSLXJl^*•■771 ' ^