Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09-19-1983 Planning Packet
M: PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:30 PM MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 1983 COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - James Grabek CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:30 PM #775 Carl Parten, 1025 Tonkawa Road Preliminary Subdivision 2. 7:45 PM #778 Jo Ann Grimes, 4720 North Arm Drive West Preliminary Subdivision ACTION ITEMS 3. #761 Douglas Smith, 3237 Casco Circle Variance 4. #771 Larry Grabill, 1350 Rest Point Lane Variance 5, #776 Alvin Glover, 3036 Casco Point Road Variance 6. #777 Glen Upton, 3685 North Shore Drive Variance 7. #779 Park Gun Club, 3660 Sixth Avenue North Conditional Use Permit 8. #780 Gerald & Nancy Bloms, 4195 Forest Lake Drive Variance 9. #781 Rodney Burwell, 1100 Millston Road Conditional Use Permit 10. #758 James Bigham, 1545 Long Lake Boulevard Conditional Use Permit 11. Select Planning Commission Representative to attend Council ***66ting of October 11, 1983. (Tuesday night) approval of minutes 12, Approval of Planning Commission minutes of August 15, 1983. ADJOURNMENT ............. pember GrabeJc 4720 North K iion Drive West Circle P°int Lane Point Road °te Drive Avenue North ^°>^est lake Drive on Road B Boul evard tn night)Council ^®s of August ^983. Zoning District - LR-lB Total Area - 4.21 acres (wetlands are not designated but area may be credited toward area requirements of subdivision per 31.841(c)) Application - Plat - Three lots Big"-"" 'twIMBP Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator September 15, 1983 #775 - Carl D. Parten - 1025 Tonkawa Road - Subdivision The three lots shall be served by a private road designated as a 30* wide outlet. The outlet is acceptable at the 30’ width, similar to driveway in Stronghold. The road sustains limited use and will function as a private driveway with Partenwood addresses. The City will still require underlying road and utility easements and standard maintenance agreement. Lots 2 & 3 do not contain the required one acre in area but the overall area satisfies three units (3.7 acres exclusive of road deduction and road outlot - one unit per 1.2 acres). Lot 1 has 139' of lineal shoreline instead of the required 140' but again, the overall shoreline of 508' satisfies three units (169' per unit). The building envelopes are adequate. The proposed house for Lot 1 meets all setback standards for the LR-lB district. The sewer'line changes have been reviewed by the City Engineer. His comments are as follows: 1. Manhole 11-3 should be replaced with manhole IN if possible to eliminate a manhole on the City system. Outside drop required. 2. The proposed service connection should connect to a wye on the sewer line and cleanouts on the line should be provided. In additon, he raises the question of Lot 5's approval of the service change. I am not aware if applicants have consulted with the owner but bhe City will contact the Gerald Partens to assure their approval of the service change. Staff Recommendation: to approve the three lot plat, Carlwood Addition, finding all standards of the LR-IB zoning district have been maintained and that there is adequate service available to extend sewer service to two additional units subject to the following conditions: • • I' mmm m.m ft #775 - Septem! Page 2 1. De 2. Ci an< 3. 4. 5. 6. Wr. sc] De: eai Pa^m aci Th< be 7. Flc Subdivision area may be Lsion per 31.841(c)) ::ed as a 30' wide Lar to driveway motion as a LI still require snance agreement. Dut the overall Seduction and t lineal shoreline sline of 508* for Lot 1 meets gineer His Dssible to eliminate wye on the sewer f the service h the owner but approval of the 9 all standards at there is adequate nal units subject ■i ;■ k I m Si % L#r HM #775 - Carl Parten September 15, 1983 Page 2 1. Dedication of 33* of right of way for Parfconwee^^ 2. City to acquire underlying road and utility easements over Outlet A and standard maintenance agreement 3. Written approval of sewer service change from Gerald Parten prior to scheduling applicants before Council for preliminary approval 4. Designation and dedication of City sewer lines as 20* wide utility easements on the plat 5. Payment of park fee of $880 per current fee schedule; Lot 2 at 0.9 acre and Lot 3 at 0.8 acre at $440 6. The property has been assessed for two sewer units. Applicant will be charged for one additional sewer unit • •7. Flowage and conservation easement over wetlands area :s over Outlot A I Parten prior to approval wide utility i; Lot 2 at 0.9 Applicant will KlrH O ® O ^ q: Z ro o iH < cn Z o:Kl < <« CJ ^ ^ I Z , fv O -» •H H •H Ui I y 00 zO o Ui sg OO -j Kl O U- inmz oo < m in o o: o: 2 -< z 3 Z ^ <^ UJ UJ Z ^ K O Oo <r z ^ o oU- r-l -j •H 5>• q: 0 o ^ tt <m M fH < u .»3S~*5O CL i-l K •H •« 1 in o o <'O z O O CO <H X Kl O •- %Din to to z inM m•- o -I q:UJo UI lii “ o o q: ^ zUI o o o iH ^ •H •H o O O m fH < 3 m < I 2n* ofH I- < UJ I 00o z z < •«< z z o: a o oCD CD < KJ .J Ql CM O in in CO fH to O zM M > > o: a < < HinUJ 3o _ o in O ipJ CO O. fH Z in<r^Co o q:m z ■H < u 3 in m < < CM M oI z o u- fH h“ iH UI • M CO tt o o o m “> o d:CO »H in o Z in Kl o in < in o z oc u ^ < 3 ^ ID <UJ I- I- -Jp; UJ O CDCO m z o o o□C iH -J UJ q: CK Z oo < o: o o z lU < < >■ \ OC < UI CL UI Q. Zo z >< <« k^CL O H yj DCocu oO < 0^ o o Z UI ’f ^ > ■ Vo: < ^ CL UJ a z O Z X < CK 3 < Z a o H in ^•H < O HO O UJ CL fH inm in in CM < o o Z in in o m < z z CK ^CM ^ z z ^ zI z o o < z •r00 z z oo in M M H 1^ CD 10 ^ gCD CD in z CO o o o q O CL CL -J fHoo o CL fH CM . ,o5 r* oIH H iH I o in in O' 00 o to o UJ U. •H 3 tn oc^ fH <CL H H UJ MM a Z Z CL < in in o 2 cy in in >- in UJ UJ UI-J ^ z CL CL O 3 < < UJ Oz I z 5- o u in 3UJu o z in o o oc oo o o M o zm UJ CM M I CL < fH a M I 00o o aO' 00 o in o in m o in < CL in zin o u -J o X lU o z M id 3 zz zUJ UI UI UI in M X Cn 3 CL <o <CL UI CL U U .•>• ^ 2 < CL 5 - 3 10 C^ UJ o < o z < CL CL UI O Z CL 3 CL O CL O ® 9UI < >- \< UJa z X << z H •O ; • (V\V ■5; I f • Vo *x o«c M U5 CD h- O H ZUI •Hoo o CL MCM < I4J CL ^ 1^ m M O O 't' 3 < inUJ o in •0 -J CL in <^ ¥ N 5M ♦- M I o in 00 c^ 0) o in o Z M UI Ui U IL Z H 3 M Z CL -i I ^< in z CL 09 X O CL < < UJ 10 O O" tj o Z < <c «o q CL CL CM q UJ UJ o ^ O O »*« CD yj CL CL Z oo < CL O c:i z w < h: >- \ CL < Uia UI CL z O Z X < CL 3 < z CL O H j J rnmmmm Mm* r r r r r r uj M < • r 1 q: H CL u. SA < UJ Ul lA H O M h* CLU O >- U4 < U. K CD li. z zM 3 Q lu O Z X ii. U < h- O _ Z UJ >- Z M.C9 < O 0. O X M Ui UJ ^ t: 5 < z z >- H UJ QU. z X z M UJ ^ H (A Ul tt UJ X >: UJ CL H C O Q. UJ Ui. Ul M CL O C H < O o r— SOoin 1— 4-> CO lO oa in +J If) CVJ •LlI-o T3ocC C QC • CO teteaMNCM (O 1 L L 3 rd fo Id cd ^ r-^CL a. ^ 01 r*C c ^ 1 o • • O 03 00 H- O Q 1- -Jo in r- 1 — m O) CM L L CNJ C 00 o fO (O O O CO f—C_> O 1 — _J \ L. •O fd 1. -o r4 •o Z 0) T3 O <>><w 1.<d ^ 5 CL 01 Qu gi X EKSId Id CO .Q. O H- z L L L ir-'- % \ U h t BoneiUA 2335 W. *1^ St. Pmmt, Mimm Pkmmm: 6f2^53* MKWuu f-Si tf Septe City Box 6 Cryst Attn: Re: F 4 C Dear We hs Addit 1. ) n 2. 1 i If y< Your: BONE: Glen GRC: 6918 "4 >• ID I- < O Roia*!*, AnJU/Jik A AnocinttA, Omc. 2335 W. *1atutk Jtifitma f 36 St. fiaad, 55tt3 Pkamn 612 •636-3600 MHWuu 1-300-622-6513 September 13, 1983 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn* 55323 Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Re: File No. 139-775 4025 Tonkawa Road Carl Parten Dear Jeanne, him Ono C. Btmtsiroo, P.E. Poberi W, ffotfur. P.E, Joiepk C. P,E. Eis4fordA. Lemberg, P E. Pickers £. Termer, P.E. Jemn C. Obcm, PE. l@[iOW SEP I 41963 ili/ CITY OF ORONO Cknn K. Cook, f.B. Ktilk A. CofAoti, f.E. Thomos £. Noytt. P.E. Pkkord tP. PoMtr. P.E. PobtM C. Sckookki, P.E. Morvift L. Sonmit. P.E. Doom C. Portordi, P.E. Jtrry A. •owAm. P.E, Mtfk A. Hoomoo, P.E. Tft K. FM. P.E. Mkhotl T. PooimooH. P.E. Kobtrt P. PJffftrk. P E. Ch,rks A. Erickson Lto M. Pawtbky Harlot! M. Olson We have reviewed the plan for the sanitary sewer relocation on the Carlwood Addition and would recommend approval with the following modifications: 1. Manhole 11-3 should be replaced with manhole IN if possible to eliminate a manhole on the City system - Outside drop required. 2. The proposed service connection should connect to a wye on the sewer line and cleanouts on the line should be provided. (Does the owner of Lot 5 agree with this?) If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly. BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC ^ fL(U- Glenn R. Cook GRC:11 r.Tv fV-: ' ^ m If inKl \ - ■i I • r'i TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Zoning Dist Area - 5+ a Application The plat i Arm Drive, district. The first within the of 33'. t: plat. The four reside for underl’ 50* X 400'" should adv: would incli of this dri Gaffron's lot inters and soil b In additio site. Planning Coim and necessar’ drainfield ai If Planning the respons: approval by a suitable < realigned sc created lot, to approve th of the RR-IB conditions: C<mn K. Cook, f.i- Keith A. Cof^. Thootot C. Nofet> Kkhord IT. Foner. F.C. Kohert C. Sthookhi. F.C. ktontio L. Sonoh, F-C- DootU C. Kortordl. F.C. tent A. Boor^om, F.E. Mork A. Hooteo. F.t. TeKK.FIeU. F.E. Mkhoe! T. Kornmoom. F.E. Kobett K. PfefMk, P.E. Chortes A. Erkksoo Leo M. Pe<»ebkt Morion M. Otion e Carlwood tlons: o eliminate a te sewer line »r of Lot 5 TO; FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator September 15, 1983 lubL^iSo^" west “ Preliminary Zoning District - RR-lB Area - 5+ acres Application - Plat - Two lots Arm Drive. Both^lots°satisfy the^lot^^f"*^H located at 4720 Northdistrict. Access to bis standards of the RR-IB zoning The first 400 feet is a platted 50' wide^tn^**^ existing private driveway, within the Grimes orooer^v wide lot and as it turns eastward Of 33-. The 3^ eSSSll?rleSlaSllSlS1^SirS^^"S""”S for underlying road and utilities^^ao^ ^ fifth use. The City will ask 50' X ann* utilities easement over 33' wide outlet The SouLSIviSMly°|rlerMI|iSShStl"®“ DrivS'S^s.^'^Srimeswould include the new ill IS corridor and if it Of this driveway. Access’location ofSeSl^ cSelSf llSSol?| Sl^SliSlled. ?lf^SlelsllS SISII-SS ITt .^rainfiold on three-acre and soil boring dlta lo lllmil ; clLJlS® specific design information 'y % U and necessa^^lot°line^rearranae^nt*^ff° complete septic report drainfield and SaSi lH ull? affording 10' setback between"^ Planning Commission does not fef»l rl^^ • leluSled%r;laSellSi|gSlp?S"^"S"' S'" ttln created lot, consider the%olLwin|''ll||m^||al?ln!"‘''^°^='' of the RR-lB*'zoning^district°have bll finding all lot standardsconditions: ^ district have been met subject to the following ’1- - V- V- ‘I, ^ Sii £’ iW‘ m i?--* #778 - Jo September Page 2 1. Applic consul 2. Survey a) b) 33 lo fr 3. City w outlot 4. Provid' survey 5. Paymen West - Preliminary ted at 4720 North “IB zoning rivate driveway, cns eastward cess easement outlet on the a total of :ity will ask autlot. The Mrs. Grimes : and if it : the maintenance lould be designated. I on three-acre [n information le septic report, ng for alternate eptic report between y and delegates r preliminary ic data confirms as been into newly 4 '"m: 3t standards following f A #778 - Jo Ann Grimes September 15, 1983 Page 2 1.Applicant to provide additional information required of septic consultant prior to scheduling subdivision for Council approval 2. Surveyor to review preliminary drawing to show the following: a) b) 33' wide easement designated as an outlot lot line rearranged so that drainfield on three-acre lot is 10' from shared lot line 3. City Will ask for underlying road and utility easement over 33* wide outlot 4. Provide City with copy of access easement documents referred to on survey dated April 18, 1983 as Doc. No. 910895 and Doc. No. 898587 5. Payment of park fee of $200 for newly created lot f-imm. ►f septic . approval lowing: ;re lot is 10* ; over 33* wide ferred to on . No. 898587 \ \ ■si -- mtk. ;/• 'M' :;f r- >4 iA'.‘mm kX'[' I) V I. r-' 1 ■j h i;. [Sf^ mui X Zo H o X Ul in ^ zN »»o'" r €1-911 • vn ZjUiL - tu irmMB r^Si ; ^ ll 1’-^ - (If I 6 f. r\i ♦o %5> ^^::l, N I « V ••\\ STITTT-■•w/il I* \a J S S 5 :M 1 1 1 ^ I ^ M1 o€ ' i 4i* -^5\!L ***^1 1 1 \\1 '■^1 \•j. *V f <^•^v, V. •'•'■.% ■..'v\\\\ '.'■- ' - V '..xw -,\ \\ ^ ■ ' P/I » .r • •• '4 •... •• ^v- ■ =• ^> m ''f;m. ■MK:' r*' Wi 0mi -■ :v.r<2i:U fe. r.:.v U&m A v'-'.- r Kl tt tt CM < llJ ^ I- H E o •- O tt CO ft UJ h- Ui CL ft CO CM < ro CM I ft UJ »- Ul ^ I M) Ul M ft ft O i| 10 10 CO e «J Ul CO CO ^ Ul ^to o ^ ^ ^ O tt Oft Ul CD to CM £ CO to CM I O'* I *0 to ft r« -i ft 10 ^ 5^“* >• CL ? < CM CO ft Z ft t O S a CO < z CO O _ O ^ Z O z < CO X ^ o ^ O ft 1 to ^ O CM t- < < I ft -t -Moz o o O 10 to CM I fto < < ft 10 CQ CD < 10 M) -J -J O O Ul Ulto a a coSSiSi to O o o to to I M>o o o CO ^ to o z Ul Ul X CO CO »- O O ft ft ft o < <f^u u ^ lU CK ft X 0 Ul ft X 0 0 ^ PC 0325-5 CD S 0 Z Z ^ ft ft UlIIi ft o Ul < V \ < Ul Q. r UJ K ft X oO < ft o O Z UJ < < >- \ _ ft < Ul ft Ul a X ft O H CM ft O O Z ft UJs g Ul fto *0to X < CM CO h- Ul to X____CO 10 CM H> ft ft 10 i ft ft ft X N O UJ Ul H Z O O ft ^ ^ ^ o I z U. ft 10 -I -J Z ^ to q: ft o 5CO O < < 10 oto o o u to X 0 0 Ul §s3 ^ g0 ^ z 0 Ul < 0 0: H ft 0 Ul 0 to X *:r Z -i N < 0 ft ^ 0 0 H 0 UJ X ft to a X X 0 ^ CM < CD 0 «0 23 0010 ARM OR U J SPRAYtt a -I CM CO < < Ul M>to H f- ft to D :d X to to CM iS fta •• M>X to ft 10 < 10 ft X ft I- f o o M> to o < CM CO ft ft I Q ft CO < z CO o Z o < CO X %o**• o r'* ft n to n ^ O fto141 ft X o < ft Qo z t i < < \ _ ft < Ul ft lU ft ft ft O o uH HO ft Q “3 Ul O 2 O Z Ul < >- \ _ ft < ty ft I4l ftosssK TO; FROM; DATE: SUBJECT j I have r submitt e comments 1. 3. 4. 5. Base drai boun the serv 2.The surf, to h. know cond. the 1 and ] The J Consi Maps trans Perce repoi use c the F althc water at wh trenc prese I road in th. about It ha Depar septi< 5 acr< subdii exist: appare testir ■ m* m'- TO: FROM: DATE: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Aciininistrator Michael P. Gaffron, Septic System Inspector September 14, 1983 SUBJECT: #778 Jo ^n Grimes, 4720 North Arm Drive West - Subdivision - Site Evaluation For Septic Systems and soil boring information commentsf subject project, and wish to make the following 1. 3. 4. 5. drlinfi2ld^»v?®^^''*^^n? September 12, 1983, the existing hT ^ 2. condition IS. My suggestion to the homeowner is that be uncovered, pumped out, and baffles checked and repaired/replaced if necessary. The four boring taken on the proposed new lot by GME Consultants, coupled with the Hennepin County Soil Survey tested sites are a Kilkennv loam or clay loam transitioning to a wetter Hamel Loam. ^ Percolation rates in holes within 20' of each other were 5"°"’ i" ” "'Pi' thfrlng^ f^ruse of drainfield trenches. The boring logs do not indicate the presence or absence of soil mottling a? specific deoths presence of possibility of occurLce of perched is limiting fortrenches; it is obvious that in the area of boring 3 the presence of wet soils would preclude the use of trenches. ^ boring on the site on September 12, 1983, located about 36"?^ ®°"'® "°bbling starting at ^ Departmenrre^anf?’^'^.^''®''®^':'’'® *''’® Building t Zoning^Pti^IrL to require testing of an alternateseptic area for the existing house on parcels less than 5 acres during subdivision.^ This is trensure thit ^he subdivision will not create future problems in reoairino existing systems if repairs become necessary. The applicant iiaii..'---'- #778 Jo Ann Grimes Page 2 RECOMMENDATIONS Additional testing should be submitted to show where future drainfield could be located on the lot with the existing house. At this time the ^ site evaluator should more clearly indicate the depth to limiting seasonally saturated zones on the sites tested previously and those to be tested for the existing house. In addition, the site evaluator should at least indicate how he projects the layout of primary and alternate systems based locations and results, and if an innovative system other than trenches is required, should indicate any specific greater^th*"*^!!^^^ since slopes at the site appear TO: FROM: DATE : SUBJECT: Applicat of the a Applicat Lot 4 Requ. Requ: Exisi Varic Varic Lot V Requi Requi Exist Varia Varia List of Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Please rev (present a secretary Planning C If the app it on to C If we are 17, & 18, ture j house. Lcate sites 19 house. i how based Lve system jciflc >pear Mm TO; FROM; DATE ; SUBJECT; Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator September 13, 1983 #761 - Douglas Smith - 3237 Casco Circle -Variance ^Ppl^eation rescheduled befr>T*<a m • « . of the applicant. * Planning Commission at the request Application - Variance - Lot Area - Lot Width Lot Area Required Required Existing Variance Variance 21,780 sq. 17,424 sq. 16,748 sq. 5,032 sq. 676 sq. Lot Width Required - Required - Existing - Variance - Variance - ft. (100% Required) ft. (80% Required) ft. or 77% ft. or 23% (100% required) ft. or 3.9% (80% required) 100* (100% Required) 80* (80% Required) 55* 45* or 45% (100% Required) 25 or 31% (80% Required) List of Exhibif-fi Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit A - Lot Width & Lot Area Study c ' letter - July 19, 1983 J- Smith letter - August 2, 1983 - Brouchle letter - August 25, 1983 P ” Administrator's letter - August 29 iQfii F - zoning Administrator's letter - August 30 ills H : SihTn with smith Application 'T Survey dated June 1, 1973 Planning Commission minutes - July 18, 1983 (presennannpnt)nattorny^annthnz°"^®"'^t/i*’®*'''®®" Property ovmers secretary called to Isk tSat Administrator. nJ. smith's Planning Commission agenda. i assSL TolT^t^ntabling. » - - -^ JL, it on^tnconcn.^®"® on the application and send #761 - Do September Page 2 What is t structure line betwi a lot lin( bring the. propertiei of surroui property 1 If it is tion is n your cour adequate . the LR-1( applicati< of this v< a) the sp< are pe* b) the coj the dij c) the grc and en’ the grc health, to the that th conveni demonSt And direct width varia study is CO] If Planning information following f. 1. 2. 3. 4. No avaiJ Sewer ar House ar additior Applicar on devel tie request jh ^•ssaeftfas. •y owners Ir. Smith's >n the ot a tabling. n and send of Lots 16, required. #761 - Douglas Smith September 13, 1983 Page 2 the total area of Lots ifi r. ttu , structure on combined Lots 16 a principal line between Lots 17 & ig’ wha<- * ” ^®l^tion to the shared lot property but Lot 18 never received a un?f available to thenever received a unit assessment, only footage charges informa- your course of action findina ^ ordinances clearly define adequate area o? wid?h for io? ^ provide the^ LR-IC zoning district standards of application finding the followino Commission may act to deny the of this variance: following standards cannot be upheld fo^ approval arlp^cSuL"?o^sucrpro^lr^y"|.‘Uedilte?radjo?n^ aSd enjSt°o%"a%ug^i^^?^irpjopertr"gL ^p^UcantrLd health?"safetyf comfort^°TOrals ’^^or'’^ impair to the intent of the Zoning Code; and" respect be contrary convenien?r"o^2L°fpplican?“buririecesLrrto^air''® t° ^demonstrable hardship or difhculty! *=° aHevxate infoimatiSn av^llbll"to%ct ’'on the"ioDl^’'®^ sufficientfollowing findings: application, you may consider the adSHionfl^v^rirncir^ constructed without the need of on^development'’lf^Lot’'l8?’'’'^ ordinance limitations #761 - 1 Septemb< Page 3 Or Plani additioi the exij I would lot lim will re: 17. incipal ared lot t line? Is rrangement 1 the surrounding Lth the pattern .able to the Ly footage charges itional informa- tar ly define . not provide standards of to deny the eld for approval and in question g property; and r structures in \ \ ^. V • preservation applicant; and . .V . i: • way impair act be contrary m: rve as a iviate ta and lot the City's ficient consider the eed of limitations mmm. 'mm #761 - Douglas Smith September 13, 1983 Page 3 Or Planning Commission cannot make a determination because it lacks additional information on Lots 16 & 17, specifically a survey showing the existing house location and setback from shared property line. I would advise that you only ask for this information if you feel a lot line rearrangement is appropriate. You may find the applicant will refuse this request since he has no control over combined Lots 16 & 17. ■ jse it lacks survey showing perty line. E you feel a 2 applicant Dmbined Lots 16 6 -Jr tirr csTArc ^ L A N N I N C W K ^ A t • nsmuancc w « V E V ?be (fUtljiU Jlgcocu pvM'.jsnf ^ 4-t* 0 f July 19, 1983 1521 HOPKINS CROSSROAD MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55343 (612) 546-6777 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Ms. Mabusth Smith who you know to be the partv^wh^ Douglas H. building permit on a lot ®PPlylng for a 1977. He was quite upset *P*’H contractor who represented him a^Jh talked to his preceding Monday. While he did Coancll meeting that -eetlng. nor did I he 1.^^ 5 himself attend the Inferences where made’that I sold^hTm*^*' impression that be unbulldable. i was arL:i if ® ^ knew to which would be made suggestlne hy any statement thing continues to fSn« ml f^d T-'/e* P"‘- Thisstraight. T ”® ®"*' ^ "‘“h to set the record np%r\%‘el‘y" ’n:t ‘ed “"iot“of“;cord^"* d!"'‘ ® received a building permit w^^h« «. While I may not have according to the zoning code becsu.’’'*! '’’* Council, of the sanctioned width ^nfirers": thr* T* such a use for a single fam^^^r^.l^ -Jl<> allow the Judgment of the C?uLu s^Jh u»^ d® that In affect public health or saf^y" r k!?? that a building permit, with proper setbacks* ItT. “Let! In keeping with the rest of the®11 of those tests neighborhood. Sincerely, • Richard Tuthlll cc. Douglas H. Smith mwmmm ^ 't' August 2, Jeanne Mai Zoning Adi City of 0 P.O. Box I Crystal Bi Dear Ms. I This lett variance pending be I will at as you re what you As you kn and haver Certainly purchased continue prepared ' benefittec am astonij Please ca require r what impoi variance c I am alsc that the of new si to admini fail to i new s tand tabling j this year of being mertitoro has infor was no re I i u n V c V NJ6-56B3 CITY OF ORONO rvi v.p\T t < ' ■-CsiV. August 2, 1983 Jeanne Mabusth Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Ms. Mabusth: This letter is to comment on various matters pertaining to my variance application to Lot 18, Spring Park Addition currently pending before the Planning Commission. I will attend the Planning Commission Meeting of August 15, 1983 as you request, although I do not understand what I can add to what you already know concerning the "common ownership" issue. As you know, I purchased the lot from J. Richard Tuthill in 1977 and haven't proceeded to build on the lot until this year. Certainly I believed the lot was buildable at the time I 1977, I have naturally permitted Tuthill to continue to maintain and use the lot until such time as I was prepared to build. Neither Tuthill or the neighborhood would be benefitted if I had simply let the lot go to seed and I frankly am astonished this was raised by you as an issue at the hearing. Please call me to explain first of all, what other facts you require regarding this "common ownership" quest-.on and second, wnat importance the maintenance of the lot can possibly have to mv variance application. ^ receipt of your notice of July 19, 1983 which states to administer its zoning and building codes over the years and I tail to see in what manner my application calls for a study andf !p of being put on hold where I believe my application is has^ inSi^ed^m Indeed, my builder, Mr. Johnson,has informed me that you stated at the last meeting that there was no reason the building permit should not be granted except mm Br'i it-* • •N. . •.» 1 / •;a '•>1 m for thi: facts nc any fur meritori August 1 Finally, that m notwiths requireir violates gross at protect complain Kindly p early op ^ry. tru Douglaslas^ V 5BB3 FORON to my rently , 1983 add to issue, n 1977 year, ime I ill to I was uld be rankly aring. ts you econd, to my states shment tunity and I 3y and this ilding ospect 3n is hnson, there except ’■ ••li-i fm ''■I' u 1 'V r.-i mM A- %■' a ♦ \fx ( hm^y. ■r'.' ■ ■ -'k V • •••' ,.L' - by- I--*" for this common ownership business. In short, you have all the facts necessary to address this common ownership business without any further delay, the application, we apparently agree, is meritorious in all respects, and I feel entitled to a decision on August 15. Finally, I am informed that Jane Remein appeared and complained that my proposed house would be too close to hers, notwithstanding that I will abide by all side setback requirements. Apparently Ms. Remeins* problem is that her house violates setback requirements. I suggest that it would be a gross abuse of your discretion to deny my application in order to protect her inadequate setback. The closeness of the homes is my complaint, not hers. Kindly phone me to respond to the questions I have raised at your early opportunity. ^ry. truly yours, Douglasy^. Smith V JEFFREY R. BR/ Attorney at Li August 25, Jeanne Mat Zoning Adir City of Or Box 66 Crystal Ba RE: Doug1 Dear Ms. M This firx applicatio had been 1 recommenda Mr. Smith lot this y Further, N intends tc likely to I request regarding options, requests ft Thank you Very truly Jeffrey R. JRB:kb cc: Douglc e all the 5s without agree, is ecision on complained to hers, setback her house Duld be a 1 order to omes is my sd at your ■f-. f.- . •vV W^'M:smy. ^ s* iil^^ ;>'• I1SI3 pVL*'r>JT Holmes & Graven CHARTERED JEFFREY R. BRAUCHLE Attorney at Law August 25, 1983 Jeanne Mabusth Zoning Administrator City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay MN 55323 RE; Douglas Smith variance application Dear Ms. Masbuth: This firm has application for had been tabled recommendation. been retained regarding Mr. Douglas Smith's variances from the City of Orono. That matter by the planning commission, apparently upon your Mr. Smith has now plainly lost any opportunity to build on the lot this year through this delay in considering his application. Further, Mr. Smith has not been advised in what manner the city intends to proceed with its study, nor when his application is likely to be passed upon. I request that you or the city's legal counsel contact me regarding this matter so that I can advise my client regarding his options. As before, Mr. Smith will promptly respond to any requests for further information. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours. cc: Douglas Smith 470 Pillsbury Center. Minneapolis. Minnesota 55402 Telephone 612/338*1177 I f AU6 29B83 !:Du »» :i ■D L CITY OF OROwn ■ , i in i * .1-. • ^ I . J h/ V.;-: August 2 Jeffrey Holmes & 470 Pill Minneapo As I att Commissi applicat lots hel were est determin At prese meet 100 single s Mr. Smit record r did not that the was reve Staff ha for comir until we an ordin recommen Please f myself i the part Sincerel Jeanne A Zoning A cc^^. Dou Bru BLILDINfJ &. ZON ASSESSING Graven :D Minnesota 55402 18-1177 Smith's t matter pon your i on the .ication. the city ation is I tact me ding his to any smL EXH'B'iT Vvip CITY ^ •>OF " '5 ORONO j CITY of ORONO Fo«t Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323•Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka August 29/ 1983 Jeffrey R. Brauchle Holmes & Graven 470 Pillsbury Center Minneapolis/ MN 55402 Re: <1761 Douglas Smith/ 3237 Casco Circle - Variance Application Dear Mr. Brauchle: As I attempted to explain to your client/ Douglas Smith/ the Planning Commission has recommended tabling his lot area and lot width variance application pending the completion by the City of a study involving lots held in common ownership since 1967 when the zoning districts were established and the need to establish new standards for determining the buildability of such properties. At present/ the City requires all lots held in common ownership to meet 100% of all lot standards for a zoning district as opposed to single separate lots that need only meet 80% of those same standards. Mr. Smith's application was accepted as a lot of single separate record requiring variance review because the area and width of Lot 18 did not meet the 80% requirement. It was in the review process that the common ownership of Lots 16/ 17 and 18/ Spring Park Addition/ was revealed. Staff has been screening all proposed lot area and width variances for common ownership involvement and advising residents to wait until we have established new standards for review rather than adopt an ordinance for a moratorium. The Planning Commission made the recommendation to table rather than deny the application. Please feel free to contact the City Attorney/ Bruce Malkerson/ or myself if you have additional questions or seek further action on the part of the City. Sincerely/ ft* /TA, Jeanne A. Mabusth Zoning Administrator ceSf. Douglas Smith Bruce Malkerson, City Attorney • ADMINISTRATION & FINANCEBUILDING L ZONING - 473-7357 ASSESSING **' - i %’•••• . '• J - 1 mm I ( •City.' OF ORONO August 30 Jeffrey R Holmes & ( 470 Pillsl Minneapol: Dear Mr. I In review Commission 1983/ I re the Planni The Planr that the^ and how i tabling t to act on for forma before th that he w was asked meeting b placed on Please ai of the p; the Builc permit sc If we do with the if Mr. Si Commissic Septembei ,Sincerely, Jeanne A. Ma Zoning Admin cc: Bruce M building & ZONING - 4 ASSESSING T OROXO ^5323* Municipal Ofnces )lication the Planning (Tidth variance r involving districts for lership to opposed to ne standards, separate th of Lot 18 process Park Addition, variances to wait r than adopt made the kerson, or action on .IC WORKS - 473-7359 y m i ■■ 4 r- i: Stesj; i T ! I •V.U I < r»n/-c Mr-; 57'£ CITY of OROXO St Office Box 66 •Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323•Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka August 30, 1983 Jeffrey R. Brachle Holmes & Graven 470 Pillsbury Center Minneapolis, MN 55402 Dear Mr. Brachle: In review of my letter of August 29 19H-4 r Commission recommendation for Planning 1983, I realized tha? 1 hav° meeting of July 18,1983, I realized that I hav^ nnf at their meeting of July 18 the Planning Commission. ^ presented the complete directive of th";t “he"y^"?u?ne:?:r„lt^l:"^our%\“e"nt"?i^ them soand how it has affected this^review and coinnion ownership issue tabling the application until thp rif-i option of to act on the applica?Lrso that it Ln'be completed or for formal action, m fact Mr Sm<th La 5^?®®'^ to Council before the Planning Commission advised me the Friday that he would atteL 15, 1983, ^ was asked to advise me if he planned to'^»L"^a® appearance. He meeting by Monday, August 8, 198^ so ?har?h» ^he August 15, 1983, placed on the official agenda. ' application could be of the Plannin^Co^issio^^L^^eptriiber meeting the Building and Zoning OffiL *=hat he notify ^ permit scheduling on tL official agend^! 1983, t^ with the o?ioinal tabling'^motiorL rh assume that you agree if Mr. Smith cannot attend the Seotembo Commission. However, Commission to act on the aDDlicaf?nn^^f meeting and you wish the September 12, 1983. please advise my office by ,Sincerely, Jeanne A. Mabusth Zoning Administrator CC;Bruce Malkerson, City Attorney BUILDI.N'g & ZONI.S’G - 473-7357 assi ;ssi.\g m ii'Ml K m ii • r\ . it k Scale: Date : >RONO J23 • Municipal Offices EXHIBIT & ing July 18, ective of them so p issue ion of ted or uncil riday :e. He 3, 1983, :ould be : meeting >tify to agree However, h the e by Certificate of Survey for Thomas B. Johnson of Lot 18, Spring Perk Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that this is a true and correct repre* sentation of a survey of the boundaries of Lot 18, Spring Park, the location of all existing buildings thereun, and the proposed location of a proposed building. It does not pur port to show other iicprovenents or encroachments. £UIi)rJR0N0 CORDON R. COFFIN CO., INC. 1" = 40 ’ 6-17-83 Iron marker Gordon H. Coffin No. 6064 Mark S. Grcnberg Reg. No.12755 I^nd Surveyors and Planners lx?ng LsKe, Minnesota ling uccff ^fOROFIlMED MINUTES OF Tl this it repre> of the •ing Park, I buildings ication of 8 not pur- nts or Piet of Survey for J, Richard Tuthill of 1€, Sprint; Park Hennepin County, Minnesota Coj*tij*iri; tc of Sui'voy : I hereby cert.iry UmL tiiij; js a true und correct representation of a su:-vey of the toundtrien of i’iirjc. also all the land, includir.i: the vacMied hii;h- way, uika Shore Drive, lyin,'; between the KorUaiastcrl:- line of said lot and the shore of Lake Plnnctonka and l>»tveen the l.orthvesterly and Southeasterly line:? of said Lot 18 extended Northeasterly to said lake shore, and beinf; {)art of Uovernnent Lot 6, Section 20 To ’^’^ship 117 Korth, Rnn(;e 23 V.est of the 3th Princinta ♦i-d indicated on the pli:t of said Spring'Park nnvV 4 buildings thereon. It does not pur port to show oti,er improvements or encroaclur:onts. Scale: Date 1" = 40' 6-1-73 Iron marker Gc^rdon R. Coffin Hec7fffo7T0U Land Surveyor and Planner Long uike, Minnesota ULRICH (cont; #761 DOUGLAS S 3237 CASCO CiRi VARIANCE j:; 0 tion «i.S of ill th« i JiiL'li- H2 tween •t and een or ke on 20, ptil Park, pur- o, 6O64 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OP JULY I9V3 ULRICH (CONT) 1761 DOUGLAS SMITH 3237 CASCO CIRCLE VARIANCE I .V... ••! ; •: !. V ii- Page 11 any^other*^altPrnAh*^* never been made aware of DNR qh^ n ♦- muskrat problems from the acc;ptfSL "^thod was anaccepcaoie method to the DNR. "''® Council minutes of July 28 n.ethods"fo^ the .u*» 4: McDonald seconded. Vote: Ayes (4), Nays (1). Adams minority opinion - Adams noted that he felt that the problem Mr. Ulrich has with the muskrats i« thought ou"t%?an"lum'l^^^^ rt”?n°e^rf\rs^e^l^„a® ^d?o:^.^ small^hilVc-ol?! Sy-thV‘ml';k\^^^f *’® -used a^p^eVtrb^e^^l‘^im"^re" fo^? ^f^rarate^V/cVr^^-a *d" i‘t^ review sh^Lund °a^p?oblVm''l^f'collon'''lw\\flh\"^ Two neighbors were present Jane Remien and Pat Spilseth. for Douglas Smith. for this application. The builder was present would^^stafV wasn’t a common ownership problem appucatlon' thiS Mabusth stated that if this was a lot of seoarat. application" ® Ptublem with this Goetten asked the neighbors if they had any comments. Pat Spilseth stated that she would be opposed to thi« lot"s ‘1rl"so°cJoslgether and the noise level could be bad. ■a 'mi mm •»vrv,fi ■H- m- m \ u • MINUTES OP TH /SMITH (CONT) #762 THOMAS CC 4195 HIGHWOOD VARIANCE I r •V' ■ ■ I.Page 11 • een made aware of problems from the 1 method was an lutes of July 28, r methods for the ch*s application ty Engineer, the ghbors, Goetten es in Orono that wall solved the the drainageway. I , Nays (1). that he felt that muskrats is very has a very well ty problem he has Plication may be i step into one of imall child could the holes caused pplication in it be record and it While doing the n ownership. s application. Ider was present nership problem ems with this ot of separate )blem with this d any comments. opposed to this • ts are so close •e bad. 5 opposed to the lots being so ot isn’t right it? 1. ■ l--: MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 18, 1983 Page 12 SMITH (CONT) #762 THOMAS CORSON 4195 HIGHWOOD ROAD VARIANCE The agent for the applicant was advised of the common ownership study being conducted currently by the City and that the Planning Commission would have to recommend tabling Smith’s application until that completed. Mabusth advised that Smith opportunity, to address the issue With staff and Planning Commission. Sime moved to table Douglas Smith's variance application pending resolution of common ownership question and ask that the applicant please attend the next Planning Commission meeting. Adams seconded. Vote: Ayes (5), Nays (0). 'mm present. Mabusth reviewed with the Planning Commission Mr. Cor son • s request of a setback variance for a detached garage. He wishes to keep the same setback of the existing garage which is 9.6 and to put up a 32’ x 24’ detached garage in its place. Mabusth noted the applicants hardships as the severe slcpe and several mature trees. Goetten asked the applicant why he needed such a large garage? ^ Applicant stated that he would like to put a double garage next to a single one used for a hobby shop. His basement IS non existent and so its because of that. No plumbing will be installed. Callahan moved to approve the street setback var iance 1. Slope of land to the south of the proposed garage 2. Location of a mature oak and several small trees. 3. Proposed setback will allow use of existing gravel turnaround and cut down on additional hardcover. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Doors of garage must face away from the street 2. Turnaround to be maintained on the site - no backing out onto Highwood Road. Sime seconded. Vote: Ayes (5), Nays (0). TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator September 14, 1983 #771 “ Larry Grabill - 1350 Rest Point Lane - Variances Zoning District - LR-lB Application - Hardcover - increase variances within 0-75' and the 75'-250' setback area setback area Hardcover - 0-75' setback area Area - 4,500 sq. ft. Allowed 0 Existing - 825 or 18% Proposed - 1,140 sq. ft. or 25% Increase - 7% as compared to 11% in original proposal Hardcover - 75'-250' setback area Area - 5,694 sq. ft. Allowed - 1,424 sq. ft. or 25% Existing - 2,580 sq. ft. or 45% (1,200 sq. ft. or 21% is shared drive) ~ 2,786 sq. ft. or 48% (1,200 sq. ft. or 21% is shared drive way) Increase — 3% increase as compared to 4% increase on original proposal Side setback Required - 10' Existing - 12' Proposed - 6' Variance - 4' or 40% Lakeshore setback Required - 75' Existing - 26' Proposed - 36' Variance - 39' or 52% List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Revised Plan Exhibit B - Planning Commission notification Mr. Grabill chose to relocate the structure 10' east, away from the lakeshore. Note the location of the well, in moving further east, the applicant also had to move six feet to the south in order to meet the required setback of four feet from the well. i would suggest the applicant move two feet further east so that the proposed garage front lines up with existing paving rather than create an additional 52 sq. tx: of hardcover. This can easily be done and not increase the side setback variance nor encroach the required setback of four feet from the well. #771 - Septemb( Page 2 Planninc 30' X 14 gain an setback. Staff Re to appro’ Grabill j setback < setback c lakeshore per revis 1.The r lakes 2.The p: of th< 3.A yeai 4.The pr 5.There 6.Vacant lakesh( hardcoi Approval is 1• Applica garage 2. No new this ini 3. No futuj If members c Section 32.2 e - Variances ' setback area % is shared drive) % is shared drive- original proposal ay from the ether east, 3rder to meet 1 suggest the 3 garage front bional 52 sq. ft. the side setback from the well. •• >rL V.' -^4 f h i mm mm Wl irZi GrabinSeptember 14, 1983Page 2 f°ion,'^L«Slre®s^ the applicant to locate setback". Of faheshore sltS^^^wrih'^a tetaMo'“L^elh^re Staff Recommendaton: 2. property couia never be d , P^-- o the LR-lB zoning district. ® "oot current standards 3- A year-round residence has existed on the site f 4. The property 1.4. The property is sewered 6. ^-p^rty. -Limttl -rves Is 9«agl “i\JXri exL?!nrpavLe ‘«.east so that this Jjthin^t^ 0-75' protected area ZTl" “ •“■ Stback ‘’®™^fff"9'’®°''i"crefsrof®7% o“h^T “PP^^o^tion of LarryE? - - at-— per revlledtt\ta^%^“- jEbEdE^LTj^T-lle^^^ ?’*’o revised plan will permit const ''^***-* findings: The property could i._ , . '#?■mm If members c;^nn^4- s>everely limited pr_ Section 32.340 of variance as revised ni zonrng code for necessary fingr^|rorl"i‘?. mimmm&m i4 :V: vti 'H < : It Vm mm ■< f.* ■•"vi. ^ . \ "c .'•'. 4> ‘ ‘s‘;-.‘ '■--i, .y •• * . * “ - •-. -■. , /v-t ‘ ‘ •*. * • y~t‘ ..•••'•*>- L*. _ • '..-i.vv.f •V '• .. .-/-r • *' •. • • •. >r. • «k ; •. ,• ^ ‘ mw. 3cate house and ^ * lakeshore f Larry e 0-75’ 75’-250’ and a 39* new residence 3wing findings: id from the i: ^andards 30 years. mm ^perty. :ves as limal m'mmm- ' l Iv' "•• iiii 10 that d area - id property. •’/ait .r ir to inial. I sgS'Sl l&iv; W;-' P- . r^::Wv*;n 4 T*. ■S5S3?.-' V- * • • • 4 t V'» •. . •• • m I V C»-----\V_ 45.72.' r 4 • - - ■ /■ ■'•HW <Lvt.e V:^i =. .tAoUa!massssaggm ^ i ^-V.' »' X,* CITY of O )St Office Box 66 • Crystal Ba & ^1 mW 'IF* .^4 Larry Grabill 1252 ^Welcome I Long Lake, MN NOTICE OF plan: Date of Meetin Votes: 5 Planning Comini; _ _ Appro’ _ _ Appro’ _ _ Appro’ _ _ Denia! X_ Tablet Tablet No ad NOTES AND SPEC decision as tc protected area to either revi: determine if e: advise me of yt Applicant' Applicant' additional meeting is for the In all cases, t! requested infori or the City wil If the applican' contact the Zon. If you desire they are avail and approval b ilTY of ORONO St Office Bo* 66•Crystal Bay. MinncsoUi 55323* Municipal Offices Telephone 473*7357 Control No V Variance 771 /' Larry Grabill 1252 Welcome Drive Long Lake, MN 55356 Conditional Use Permit Subdivision, Preliminary Date of Notice 8-22-fi‘^ NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Meeting _ Votes: 5 For R-1 0 Against Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval: As submitted Approval: Subject to conditions noted Approval: Additional information required before Council meeting Denial Tabled Tabled For reasons noted Pending receipt of additional information from applicant Pending review by others, or further Planning Commission study No action required m NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS tour application has been tabled pending your decision as to the relocation of the principal structure out of the 75*_ _ _ _ _ _protected area - you were given conceptual direction by the Planning Commission to either revise your plan or have building inspector make an inspection to determine if existing foundation can sustain the proposed second story. Please advise me of your decision. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Planning Commission Council Applicant s next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the September 19, 1983 meeting is ..September 1 . 1983 or Octoh7r~ii 1 qri for the October 17, 1983 meeli;;;^:- - - ^ - - reque\^d^^^f fPPfication must be continued with the submittal of or the City will consider the application as formally withdrawn. conSct^the'zonLS'AdlinisiLtor^ additional information, please official Planning Commission Minutes and^^atr Building and Zoning Secretary upon reviewand approval by the Planning Commission review 6^* ■V'lu II i. :l i ii f i -I i- ^ V\v mm < TO: FROl DAT] SUB« Zon; App; Revj Lot Caol fee our Staf tota will need to C If a or a proc Revi note In m shou can The of t. and stani subs lots ^/kx.hf t 3 771 / onal Use Permit sion. Preliminary 8-22-fi3 incil meeting com applicant ig Commission ed pending your f the 75’ anngng Commission inspection to nd story. Please iipt of , 1983 983 ttal of n. please Lssion Minutes 5n reviev/ :u » i Id—■MhMM : ■ J itJ -. . .CL. TO!Planning Commission FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE:September 13, 1983 SUBJECT: #776 Alvin Glover, 3036 Casco Point Road - Variar»ce Zoning District - LR-IC Application - Lot Area and Lot Width Variance Lot Area Required = 21,780 sf Existing = 7,868 sf or 36% Variance = 13,912 sf or 64% Lot Width Required = 100' Existing at Road = 50' Existing at Rear = 65* Variance (road) * 50’ or 50% Variance (rear) =35* or 35% Review of Hardcover - Allowed 250-500* = 2,360 or 30% Proposed = 936 sf (house only) Lot 159 was tax forfeited at one time and purchased by an I.D. Caples at public auction. The State Land Department is still fee owner; Caples is purchasing property on a contract for deed; our applicant is purchasing lot via Caples - I know not how! Staff must be assured by the County that such sale did include total special assessments owed the City. The Finance Department will review the application for assessment payoffs and the possible need to assess any additional fees bec*'<*isf^ the original price to Caples may have not covered City's total assessment for lot. If a payment is due the City, it may be payed with building permit or assessed against the property. Staff will explain this entire procedure to Glover at the meeting. R®view the plat map for pattern of neighborhood development, note the majority of building sites consist of 3 combined lots. In my opinion, the application is incomplete. The site plan should show a garage and driveway so that the total hardcover can be determined. The lot is of single separate ownership. The lot area is 1/3 of the required lot area for the zoning district. A house, garage and driveway could be placed on the lot and meet all setback standards and hardcover allowance of 2,360 sf. The lot is severely substandard when compared to the average lot sizes of the surrounding lots. The property is served by both sewer and water. #776 a; 3036 Ci Variant Page 2 If Plar of Alvj The wit 3. The Pri Approve App. sit< 2. All for App] fine owne If Plann Glover t 2. The dist; 3. Revi< Variance >y an I.D. is still :t for deed; lot how! Ld include i Department id the possible lal price It for lot. lilding permit i this entire Lopment, lined lots. Lte plan lardcover ia is 1/3 house, garage setback .ot is severely : the surrounding 1. 2. #776 Alvin Glover 3036 Casco Point Rd Variance Page 2 If Planning Commission approves the variance application of Alvin V. Glover the following finding smay be considered; The property is served by sewer and water. without°reauirina*^add^ complete residential unititnout requiring additional variances to the Zoning Code. single separate ownership to crsation of zoning district* 4. Review Section 32.340 for additional findings. Approval is subject to the following conditions: s??“p:?or"o"'cou ”u®:fel?nr -P-vements on 2. All future improvements on the site must meet code stand»^.i. for future variances will not be granted t^thil property 3. Applicant must pay for assessments still owned the Citv if “SuS s"iiri‘ar“...... s ’• IS SiriSSh!''’ “• "■“= “"*«• 3. Review Section 32.340 for additional findings. r IM ft tt C O 9 < » o o z UJ < < >- Nft < lu a wj CL cS X 9 ? ■ ■: 1 IIP.- ./.V;.. A [1®(1DW[S[]^ •> • t AU6 26Be3 EXP.IEIT Ui/ CITY OF ORONO C6rt>iricat>c of Survey r ♦ ICO Alvin V. Glover Lot 159, Wlnshlp'8 Subdivielon of Spring Park Lots Hennepin County, Minnesota #776 i»f . , I herelgr certify that this la a , rei^aentaUoB . . V ' ^ f* • attirrey of thie-hoibidariea of : VtoahiliU ^ of • .'*;•■ ' ■ 'fterlBa Rai*V <1._:'_x-•:. a . '■v:,: : -?■ iiS* ■:-'fm1 m 1 ,-■ •» I • I r *• ^ - • • .V '/A;.' ,.' i'ri-.ri ji.'.** »♦ V** • T A^#4* i*l ! * * ' .v- >Wa4:. '.f; Pf ■■ j* .5^ &' ‘V .-,%w V. ^ -- -Tr.-i-’v II*. - X rk Lots FROM: DATE; SUBJECT: Zoning Dis Area - 12, Applied tic LIST OF E] Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Setback V« a) Street Requir< Existii Origins b) Lakesh« Requir< Existii Origin; Hardcover Allowe< Existi: Origin. REVIEW OF The owner renovatio * structure protected years and have simi the last for the p from actu but from TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Commission Jeanne A. Mabusth September 14, 1983 SUBJECT: #777 Glen C. Upton, 3685 North Shore Drive - Variances Zoning District - LR-IC « tci Area - 12,141 sf or 56% (majority of lot located within 0-75 setback area) Application - Renewal variance application - originally approved by Council on April 13, 1981. LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Application Property Owners List Plat Map Current site plan and building envelope approved on April 13, 1981 Council minutes 4-13-81 Planning Commission minutes 9-22-80 Zoning Administrator *s memo 4-8-81 Site Plan approved 4-13-81 Setback Variances a) Street Setback Required = 30' Existing = 5'5” Original approval for Lakeshore Setback Required = 75' Existing = 39' Original Approval for = O' = 50' Hardcover Variances 0-75' Allowed = O' Existing = 730 sf Original approval for =1,315 sf (non conforming accessory structures not included - 130 sf) REVIEW OF APPLICATION #578 The owner sought approval of multiple variances to permit the ^ ^ renovation of existing structure and to construct a major addition to existing ‘structure. The majority of the lot is located within the 75 feet protected area. A house has existed on the site for over 50 years and the house is connected to sewer. The neighboring properties all have similar setback problems and have all been improved within the last 20 years. Council approved a special building envelope for the property. The setback of O' from the street is not from actual travelled County Road 51 as the survey would suggest but from an access road that is maintained by all five property IS #777 g; Variam Page 2 owners contain Departm the rig road. Recomme Street Lakesho 0-75' h« CURRENT Mr. Upt at this that vi improve filed a X 15' d setback be expa] for the Upton as] envelope will meel 10 feet 1 area. In the at Planning and appro and reaui Staff is the total to revise variance I have A resoli in 1981 of the ( nances -75‘ jproved k^ed on tsory structures tf) i ^.4 IIM* if- W:mi / W { : the addition to existinc > feet : 50 .ng properties all within envelope lot sugge st roperty ■■ -’ViSWL-i, ■7^, f v:;;*;.' k -f ^yr. •mMm §777 Glen Upton • Variances Page 2 Department, but for this use the n County Highway the right of wav a leni County would have vacated rold! ^ The road functions as Tprivate Recommended Building Envelooe . . Street setback = 0' Lakeshore setback = 50' ^^^^cover variance approved =1/315 sf CURRENT APPLTrATTOM a^thir^ij;^? "Hetlfbien'askertr*' P^°P««ythat violated the aoDrov^aH remove a lakeshore deck improvements to this^property filed a variance application^to the deck and X 15' deck to north easrs?L °/^"‘^^ relocating of 15' setback from the lakeshore/ He^has“IIked^tharh® ® be expanded to include all setback snfl original application for the original owner in April of ®5^i^®>^<3=°ver variances approved Upton asks that the Citv envelope established in^oriainal building 10 feet to the northwfsrout of tSearea. ^ teet lakeshore setback P?a^nLfco:j^LiL"me:bers':arwisrt^^^ ’=*’® property, and" ^ tLVllLltfeet setback from lakeshore be maintained. to revise his variance application He has just asked me variance for application #578? review it now as a renewal A resolution should^have^been^drafted^^^d^^ Upton - in 1981. Mr. Uoton never would hav<a s^^inst the property Of the code if such a resoTS^L^n^L^^ ' ' I''" % ■k 7^/ •?S. ■ -■.I'-'' #777 Gler Variances Page 3 STAFF REC To approv total imp Drive as Stre< Lake: Tota! (Thii Applicant on northee and at th€ such imprc existing, the follov 0 set 50' s All new an 1/135 sf o Approval b 1.Propos of the 2.Proper 3.Establ 4.Improve improve 5.Affect* 6.No add: Approval be 1.Major p setbac)< 2.Locatic envelop ess road Highway ated s a private irty ieck for all !Ck and ^ 15' I 40* nal application es approved ilding construction be placed tback Dperty, 2ck proposal C- • v- m m lintained.'W /i 4 for 1 me V ' ‘ 1 1 renewal . : j Upton -'i’” 1 he property ' < 1 lation j| he property., 1 w- s-i ■'mim V. €^ K- ' m ^ #777 Glen Upton Variances Page 3 STAFF recommendation To approve setback variances and hardcover variances for the total improvement of the property located at 3685 North Shore Drive as follows: Street setback variance of 30* Lakeshore setback variance of 25* Total hardcover approved within 0-75* = 1,315 sf (This includes existing house structure) include a garage and the removal of the tte“fo??;w;nrseS2? """ construction must meet 0 setback from access road 50* setback from lakeshore 10' required setback from all side property lines All new and existing construction will be held to a limit of 1 / 1J5 sz of nardcovGr*. Approval based on the following findings: orthrcomprehens!ve"p!an.°^ Environmental standards 2. Property is sewered. 3. Established residence on property for over 50 years. im^rovi:inL?°"®""‘®"" neighborhoods 5. Affected property owners all support proposal. 6. No additional land available. Approval based on the following hardships: setback°area^^ buildable area is located within the 0-75* enve^ope.°^ limits building ■i. II ik 4 A \ ijll • « 92 s • m 9^49 > is •i • 9 4 • >•\ r JL »» 7»r-*y—^Win-j Soff5 ^ t iimn ____________S} % W. V*- \ ^ WS <•% ‘a-. »'r he ore sck liore perty, bhe meet 0-75' ding M- :-V nm X V ■>,-s- <>■? ■l;®- r,-- / Treaty jjjTT I Zc»Zf W' ! 1 • i c ! i iov*i jTi 4* 1\ *^l ■'*v r>' ^.: 'jt. •? 4 '• ■• m« h -L.O •r-i» ») V/ • • r> EXHIBIT \' ^ r f: -* p©[in\wfg AU6 I 5B83 life £-i ^ tfiRQNO [>•;•.. . H • ' I « . ■*.'5 V 'i^-y ■jt ■•- mm • \ w '::m^ ■ td\.\ T1 I ■>:I m .i SKWiK.- «Wi j- ■'-'rW'd mm ■:-r 4t • • . \i •• • . , -■< « •on I hereby cer the boundari "Crystal Bay embraced in dr of record in and for s. proposed loci improvements 1" = 2C 7-9-81 Iron rvi ; / •• . j '9 BIT -w r ,rt M*- . PI m-i >-‘ry ‘ rvr.^^:-‘T .f At ’*8 » f Ccrtiricits oT Survey^^ ^*^0 for Chnrlof; R. Carl of Lots 6 and 7, Cryst.-.! Ifeach, part of Lot 2^ CrystaX Bay View Hennepin County, KJ.nnesota IS£-I^ “F‘" *.*-S'emSaced ^^the plilt”of ”»r^l?°rp^n Minnesota, except that port of said Lot 2 Scale Date 0 1" = 20 ‘ 7-9-81 Iron nvirkcr Ji.- Cordon R. Coffin Rei?%. 6064 Land Surveyor and Planner I/Ong Lake, Minnesota ‘•j 1.Location 2.Only bull 0-75’ set and • based on 1.In keepin 2.Property 3.Compatibl« 4.All neighl tv--, •• Page 7mm .......... ■ ■ nON #1267* Kroger Run :iAL BUILDING ioreline Drive Creer Drth Shore Drive 5 Carl LNCE 'onkawa Road .1 Pough T 1 ■4 <■ K I ’ JT. zv Liii 'mm k".AiW ,v f; *‘V‘ f •: UTES OF A PLANNING CO.-.-USSION MEETING HELD ON sept E^^^A'^^z J igrr^-pAcTs revLwef thri^fo^atl.n^'’® Ad„,inistrator Conunission on this application^*^^A Planning existing hardcover and ^ survey of the four other homeHn the Carl ZT the to be more excessive when compaJld*’to*’°°‘^ Proved proposed by Carl. planning improvements that the neighbortoo^ imp?ovfm^'“"°"during the 60's and Carles aoDlicaf"®'^® •‘^°™‘’^®ted to todays more restrictive s^a^dards? ^ CHARLES CARL 3685 North Shore Dr>'ve VARIANCE (#578) Wf' m A review was made of >. involving improvements applications In each lase!^ thrippUcaUcns^w® °'''' "^^back area, on either drainage imorov»^°2f ^^sedon either drainage imDrov».i°''! approved based ' hardcover located closer to®?hl fhorllinl^ existing located^4^®Lrther*’awa^*’f construction will be noted that according to submittL®’’?'^®^^"®' “^busth located in the 4' area “^""ibbed plans, a deck was Planning Commission advised r^yi 4-u ±. • • addition is approved within than the existLrgfrage^ould'haCl^a new garage would not -^ ® that vacates thi propert^to ^he County noted that even^^if Countv dn« P^^^Ping Commission e 30- setback from traveled ^ of way construction ofa garag^^UhL''?h^^garage within the protected area. variance involving theTluow^^''°''? variance - 35’; street sethaXt"^' setback hardcover variance 0-75* safK*^ variance - 22.5'; 730 s.f., proposed additio^l oSO^r? ‘ (minus existing garage) i2b^= ? 1 the following Lrdships- 1- Location of existing house. '■ on property located within and based on the following findings: 3.' J^ope'rtl comprehensive Planoperty is sewered. 3. Compatible with neighborhood development. neighbors support improvement to property. Motion seconded by Jabbour. Vote; Ayes (6). yv:v^ ^ i . > • K V-.i ■ - * ■•.;- . *: m t fc i-. m-m'- fuTES OF A Kr veyno made the approvin no additions setback area Ayes (6), Na 1 Rovegno made above noted is vacated, , to the prope; Vote: Ayes Minority Opin be denied bas< Addition area. 2.Accordinc viewed as assessed 3.It would completed could be Carl asked th at the Octobe Mr. Lorge an Mr. & Mrs. R Mrs. Sam Chi Raoul Schand The following j position: 1. 2. 3. 4; 5. Lots o The pr develo On pur that t; was ba; Propen receiv: House j 6.He re( but he even an ambd 20jrijL_r)_o_ '7>. 1 • •• . ’» 22; igtrff" -"PAcrs LRLES CARL 15 North Shore Dr^ve IIANCE 78) mm 1. ■:n I /•?.• - i>‘ ,1 H iL?V,-.'i*i? ■i ; 'r li* r^u '•••*t^f'" - t..' f, •«v=-; V •.*?' Jit’"** W’^:\ ^TES of a planning commission meeting held on SEPTEMBER 22, 1980 - PAGE < Rr vegno made a motion to reconsider an addif-inn 4-E^ the approving motion: That a condition be setbfck^re:' all°wed^wuSi^%^f Ayes '?6)! N^ys "l" " A^ams. Vote: V I CHARLES CARL 3685 North Shore Drive VARIANCE (#578) Cont. Rovegno made a motion to add the follnur-inrr *.u above noted condition that unti? cltnlVriuht rf^ IS vacated, additional variances will b= ^ to the property. Motion seconded by A^ams Vote: Ayes (6), Nays (1). Motion passed." Minority Opinion - Frahm felt tho ar^r^^ • be denied based on the following: ^P^^^ation should AddiUon of 12% hardcover within the 0-75- setback viewed al new construction'{morl thS^^SOt^Sf thS“^^ assessed valuation). could be located out\Tlrltlltll -P-—" Mr. Lorge and the following neighbors were present- Raoul Schander, 2745 Casco Point Road RICHARD LORGE 2697 Casco Point Road VARIANCE (#581) position?''^^"^ ^ summary of the applicant's Lots on both sides are occupied. 3. deSelSS^ “ existing neighborhood 4; that^this^was^a^h°^?5^Ki was informed T V .M. . - ^ « House is located solely on Lot 4. bSt^%=°^StlS%h ‘SS She"D:MlSt%"S?e “i°Sn'pr:i"“’ *.V4 .k-'rm m-l mm ,1^ 0mM 1 1%'. m A-. . J*K- ' ■4 i m N>- ;r f' •.%, II E".- N-i II On C hard the He V) setf A bu setb The 1 is 1: plac« Exhil The 1 of tt hardc If Cc the f Based ■■••I v?r ’ i t;.. ■■ 1 ■ ■-’ v> 1 ;-v.-v- -• th !P*M V; '■. ™ h %ri f . V. ;\i V^: v V . . v.iftifc *ny > * H X f rm ■>vj^.1%. f < j ^. &5^, R.-/'- \v - Is f..y•*. . <J- #*- <-*5------' • ^r- • ' r - - .jft^sitti^i^'air; Planning Commission Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator September 14, 1983 Zoning District - RR-IB Applicable Ordinances - Ordinance 32.400-Conditional Use Permit Review Ordinance 34.821-Clubs, Companys, etc. LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Application Property Owner .List Plat Map Septic Card - Site Plan Survey Original Conditional Use Permit Application Approval of Conditional Use Permit CURRENT APPLICATTON Applicant has filed a conditional use permit to allow the reoair and to build an addition along the wLt approximately 20* x 20*. The addition will be built o^ Tho^oif^°"^ existing foundation and will not have a second story targ|?s ^Thrf^ifin structure will be for storage of clay line of the club house at 80'. in fact, the curving of tL lot aiav County Road 6 finds the addition 5* to LrtLraway from the street lot line. J-urrner system il t^th^r^^ I'k P"^°P°se<i improvement. The septicEi*?hT^ n northeast of the clubhouse - reviewE|^ibit D. The addition will not affect the servicing of thewe rnn^pT^ conditional use permit issued to the Park IZ should check with applicant tf sound barrier trees were planted. The City has recelvf»rt no complaints concerning the operation of the Gun CluL ^ survey of the property. Note Starkev Road does not appear on the plat map. i will check lii-h P^lic works Director to determine if 3^ alonfthe eas^ border e property should be quit claim deeded to the City. .t i*:iiJ 1 v3\ . ■» Hi ; w * ^ w ■-^4 L-r ■ h m Ml ■:-wm ■M ■'wSv'^m .1? 'm mt ■ > • •r-f '' r* #779 Pa; Conditi< Page 2 STAFF R] Staff r< Park Gu: 1. The and app 2. The thal be c 3. The adhc Approval 1. Stal of X 2. Det€ Avenue ‘rmit Review 5tC . ipair zest or >tory . : clay front lot k eceived ey der M H.*'- ^ »!.>.*•■ • ••'■'■ •" • _. .. . - '•"■■ “‘"iJ #779 Park Gun Club (Donald Maas) Conditional Use Permit Page 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for the Park Gun Club based on the following findings: 1,The proposed addition will not be in conflict with the intent and objectives of the RR-IB Zoning District nor of other applicable sections of the Orono Zoning Code. 2.The proposed addition will not allow a use of the property that will depreciate surrounding residential properties or be detrimental to the public, health, safety and welfare. 3. The club has operated for the past Severn years under strict adherence to programmed shooting schedule. Approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Staff to determine need for quit claim deed of 33' feet of right of way for Starkey Road. 2. Determine if tree barrier was planted. \ ■r -f ■; •• 4 ■^ ■ '• *' J m 0^- yf : t f -w IL lU UJ > > Oi CK Ui UJ </> COI4J yj K -J >• Z UI o UJ S _ M id 3 < q: UI < -i < ^ o Z CO M q: U 2 >Z i-4 < M 3 ^ _ X N CMS S U D => 3 CO a lo ^ -I UJ cj loU U (D >- ck 3 D A Uo o 5 > q: ^ 9 ft o: O ? 5 \ ^CL CJ Ui CK K X a o < ft aC3 Z UI < < >• Nft < Ui CL UJ a XSiiSia o H M •V ■ Ui mmmmmm, : .••' '•■=•'/ ■■■■ \V:. c<S" r- / / I I t Ja 3^ I \Vj \ \ I mm NS V % t) 3OX .|i I? .. «® a» »ii« ^ .!2 S O ^ <N t»T)3 u c Xo X ? O ¥t '■6 $o "O c^ « M X IZc c -ID *3 w. ID <D .y -D -C s ? o S m 2 0 Z 1 GCo ILzoa 2 0 2 1 2 O QC < 0 2 < H in CD D CO 1 in 0 2 1 GC 0 ll 2 O U 1 u MSilieiii r*^''^?i^<3‘'r* '^ »# A' ^ Z • ^ a I*k^A? > » V » *■ b: %•• * • Plikt or Suin/oy for Pftrk Oun Club in Ix>ts 1, U, uni 15, Hlnntttonka Garclert Aero Honnej'in County, KinrooolA "T. “ / V / ■• / Cfrtsnc;xto of Cvv^'cy: I horcty tr4:i ir. e tru?v .'.nci corr&c t ropvvscntritlon of a ficMvcy of ■i’hcj \ic.vir:cn:*i ‘.‘ss of bot?. 14 nr.rl 15, and tho Sf;\r;:i* 455 fo?.t nr Lot ?*., ail in Jiinv.ctoi;:iii Giri.-'ri Acrrjs, o>:cn}7t that: jio of fort heu be-sn r.ii\o to mr-i tho- bo\m;*ai*it<Ci of tnr.t rart of paid Lots l.i J?nd 15 l.rinr. Souti'.ffri3' of tl:e rwrtben-ly rlL'ht-of-uor Cov/xtr IiC»KV Ko, 6. It UOOflf !JOt pu't'^'ov't to xiMox? J.r’T;ro"»’n — ii;:?it:: or • 'Tn creaclrrrrrta» AIJG ^ n 1983 R\ I ! J ! / 9 // /* V •• **<“ ^ ~ Li-ttd Sur'/nyuT ;’vv't l'L'‘jr.?'.or* LoiJj: 1akc, Kur.iiOf-.'ia '4 .;X iSi -m'2\ m-f*. ^ * \\ :-i X Vh; ■i V' i 'j ki-':h i m LOCATION OF PROI Aldress ^(pCff C ^’■7?r n tegzd Descriptio APPLICANT Name 1 p ‘pri* ± Li I j M Address ^30 7 Oli-ER iiaiTB fa;ic ci:: f Address LO:: q ] Present Zoning Zoning Ordinance Sepci^^ Ordinance E>?>lain Request R *PP> Pn^l i^xtent of I'Jon-coni hardships to Prope C m 1. Application 2. Plat Map Se Survey Date TtI * t?;>rrfeC(. Bvrvcj f ! So\r;:i» all in Lcr^i s, hen bho- oirh of 5 xn >r Cov.'ity KT» !30« proTfi- :rrrfc3. // /f />• o0<-< '.or- :. " • >f ' / -‘fw . «• ; ■MMSESS V; • •EKN:-f!T F / 9- / '; •• .p cm OP OHONO, mNNEsom .«»• CcnditiDnal Use and Variance ^^lication ^ ^ r-. I \./i LOCATION OF PROPOSAL (or raxperty) Mdress"4- .. ^ • •** •c I^gal Description pr^4-. / APPLICANT on G L^-B. 13: ^5356 8400, 0500’orcels 8 Lot 14 35 f- Name lZY G fOl\:b ■Tect.-TrcaPhaie a 537-8253 Mdress /g^q r^, q.tjS \r.:. ::. ITLS.. ',Ti. 55429 ai-ER I-Iane FAriC Ci:: PLI3 ^»ddress LO:: c- L!^. 111. 55356 Present Zoning____K R - I .j. j::c.Phaie # 473^9163 Present Use Ciolj Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to tequest__2l£23_-<^ Sepcify Ordinance Requirenents TyPE OF FE3QUEST X. Conditioned Use _ Variance ____ Wetlands Variance xvt*r • r ) SC"*'- Fee BOR CFFICIAL USE ONLY Council action Date Approved Denied 5 4 — dc tJD ■ r,‘£ *J/i US-£^ *” Explain Request Relative to Requir cd 12-19-74 effoctlve 1-1-75^ (GoMditioyal Use Permit) Hardships to Property a/4 plication ccnpleted Plat Map Section Survey (Sketch i METEadAL NDC^^ (Must be submitted 1 week prior to Council ffeeting) 4. Abstractor's Certificate of Prooertv Cfc^ners VJithin 300 Ft. 5. $30.00 Fee Date July Q, 1Q7f.Signature Pros. -Perk Giw Club i I* < n ■. ■« .1 n r ■i -h ■ ORONO COUNCi: Henry Muhich stated that Planning Coini information : Avenue Norths with proposec approved ext€ operation thr for submittir iI"' *4 #1 Planning Comi The Park Gun showing the j colored plat a large aerie The Club proj trees along 5 trees at Sixt area in the c posed lightin when a separa The Planning of the condit operation and for next year the proposed ( of the sound ] Paurus move< conditional 3660 Sixth } Commission ^ Ayes (4) - j Henry Muhic stated that their surpr reversal of Becker subd reason for listed as a the Council Planning Coi proposed su] Mr. Becker 1 proposal of acguir.'ng er to meet mini Commission i their decisi ,,v t .» •t'/l r.’-I!•« '« ..•*v r JBQUEST Conditional Use Variance Wetlands Varieuioe Fee ficial use only ncil action ed UXL DCipliGr.ee vdth Dral Use Ferr:.it) te of Property Lub / nmrnmmmm .■ M 'S I:yiJ mm • .. ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 25, I97S I:<£f — ^ w r W Henry Muhich, Buildino & 7on,-«« • • stated that the Council was Planning Commission’s reauLf^o ®^ information for the Park^r»«^nf®^ detailed with proposed Im|rov^I„|f approved extending temporarv operation through OctoLr ^X t°.continue for submitting necL%\“^rda?a"^:^u:r?edr""^ Planning Commission Meeting - October 18, 1976 siJowrnfthrpropLirhISrfol o^ratiof rS owiSs,%nd The Club proposed nianf,* entire property. trees alon^S^lr^f f sound barrier of trees at Sixth AveLe North anr«-h’'® ®*i®ting operation ani approve! existing the p!o1o^:d“ca!e“S^:r "d° 3660 Sixth Avon.i£*J'"^5u®tio Club, Commission MinStls If Oc»-®h Planning Ayes (4) - N^yl (0)! Motion stated*^thlt*’the'’pif||inl Administrator, their surprise and nn ^ ommission expressed reversal If ooncern regarding the Bec!irs^Cliv!l!ln’^irr!"^^^^e"reason for their North Ferndale. The listed al a pllgrliriflo^r the Council Letill of I ! °u *'''® *5enda for Planning CommilliH iLfll The proposed subdivisiln If theMr^ Beck^T- . lots. They offered proposal of only^4°i|||^^o ^'^'"^t a revised acauir.-no enough ^^e possibility of to'meet l®n<3 f°r the 5 lIL Commission rlllellll .?*>® Planningtheir decisiol“!l|||i||“!9"5^oCouncil reconside? Page 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 3660 Sixth Avenue North #154 Park Gun Club SUBDIVISION 511 North Ferndale Road #156 Klaus Becker (Continued) 'M ■ ^P".-- „r .i. . Vw ke Drive -- r-; A 3n of the sale neowners c from the riparian Duilding strict have )ws: onsistent Bloms to Forest with pattern m. - » 5 • >.. 1^: mm 'mms. i::I ili ii ^mm t.Vi^ 'mw t-i iiii ' iMiiiiiiiif'*' liiiBiii iiii 11 »-•,*• . * ■ .'. /V* V t%'sidwfe^ • -vJLj 1" -**• . :v. ;.: v;1 mmk^fsaeu ;^4‘3wm mmrp I . m mm •':SiiSmpi .■y.-r^aMBBc |%r,-^^rsspyy:'- #780 - Gerald & Nancy Bloms September 15, 1983 Page 2 3. The proposed plan requires no additional variances 4. Neighboring property owners are in complete support of the application Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Access to be approved by the Public Works Coordinator 2. No future variances will be granted for this property •v . » s. • » .'.A-A i- -■■-V •A . ‘t’ !rv- - mm ^0-' ■ A? m <a v5. ■ 1-'m m, m livi' *. ^ Qi v>\ k V*i 1 B* ‘7 '"'Tp ;4 1 K»« 1 iS' 1 .> \T» '— < • V- ft* ‘i? 1 ^ » ^ •'AiJ.iQ)••*^/ ^ • S3._i 4'•j •< 1 *'►.«• ' _^5JSi;_ r • ■1. i •k ■W, L?v I". < J! 'v*"* :V. ; -,?■•I3?aiMffy;y " ’Ziir. ;-'.:l..= ■ il?isi‘%aiiifemm i r^-'4:r.; A. 5 P >9^a * '**■?] I .^1 ■■i:’ &'s;v ■XMm- ,r‘-I'f p CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: C£/^ALD f A/ANCY fiLOMS £-QBr£ ^ T LA /Ye:9t»M - ^DR/VB/nH—- S*rt , m^rf*9711 / \ • • \ #"l VA* £tt4.f»Y7S.A Kin 9 ^IL f97T)j»A|i vId l 32.0 •4 ^ /Mi.0 / ^r*me tz.9 • 9U.Z wC".' k,‘>w72*| O / —■ ----------------- ^ ,— - A — CZ/z/f/y S*S^">00^ I *9701 942-0 - -/6f.00 - - iiA LEGAL DESCRIPTION AU6 3 1 1963 £LTY OF QRnNn\J) LOT 6, BLOCK 3, FOREST ARMS COUNTRY CLUB ADDITION. ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Denotes iron monument Denotes offset steke Denotes existing elev. Denotes Proposed elev. Denotes surfece dreinege Proposed gerege floor elev.^77./? Proposed lowest floor elev. ■ 974-0 Proposed top of foundation elev. > 977-9 BENCH MARK: i^f^ron Z0.of ^f' z7.£, ^0yje m 973.35 ’X' DEMARS • GABRIEL land surveyors , INC. 3090 Harbor Lane No. Plymouth MN 59441 Phone: (012)550-0005 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above described land and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land! As surveyed by me this Au-^. ytkSS Minn. Rag. No. 9096 File No. 3110 A Book - Page //3-Z4 ., s. W4^- p-l-> ’ . ^ '-iikd •V. ■:'r^ I; p* wm ' *1 X. I .«• . P • * * !'.• . • *: ’.* • : • . ... • iv .. • ■ •: • •• •% V ‘ • . • •• v« ;-.. • . • * • ^ *. . ^e , . r -.. e. . i •.' \;X7- sv. •:. »• •• • • ■ ‘ • i-'* ■ ■ »• ' • ♦ .V** • ’"‘t ' **• 1 ^ V*':• -■ • "• -^X X: - • •- .'. •. orelev.» 97^'O jndation elev. ■ 977.& //'•/? /•S. ^0uje irvty of jildings, id land. File No. 3110 A Book - Page //5 • Z4 »• ."rl ‘ .::> ■ i (Q • '*r*. **»* • f mf *•' .... I .‘vV- • .' •VVj A- • T • rT^j' •, ; c •••••.'*• ' *•» • • .* •..• . • . . -w . ^ .•*» I. . .■-i; *. * '»•.?■■:,;««•■ ♦ «Im. ii / • *1 *. I , •■■ ■. vV* .; -'I.*'* • • •> . * :<. • • •:1-. - •• /;.*■. v»vV:V'• • • • Ji V 'M.: ; - . ■■ ■•! ■ ■ '.'■■■ ' ,':■■■;•■' J V- .•>Jv R .■ V ■ • . •Ap>. * r •# • • % % * ••• • *. . *.• •? . V '• • • \ ••* ; •• .« , : .* • » .; V/.*.-• #ii ?*• 4. •. 'f 'i';. ‘ * * • • ’ . * ’ • • - * • *\\\\\v . * t* ■ •\\\ i-jXi,... j.\\v .-.* ^ Vt 'u-iJS ! *.. . 'V1V-; . • . * , % * -; . \ I * v;.. 0 *; , . I ' ^ I • • • • •.. . f. • ««.i •*. : • ‘ • r«* ' • -.• • \ : . t-*-* • —» . » • • • . • . • *1 r*»j . t — • ’ . • • r.’..-l ' : V f.c IT- 1 :.;\ ^ ^ • ' *>V"*; -. •»••.•■ • • ..^*v •*>• • # . . . ? • ; • • : .;• V • -t- v / •. \ ‘ • * .* ;\ .. • * • • •.* • ■ * . ^ ' ' •. •* • .* * • • *. .•c ' . i... . • . •. . ^ . •. , .V/V, v*^ >• > •I—^ II . .« V, 'f ^ _ W C V-^V-V. .: V^r :» IL > t*P<V *i • *'• • . * ;! • pTy V* s » • • 1 . • ^ *;-:.J .• . 'rT •''T ,-i.3. .• * ■W * ‘ ^ 'irv t'' K-i'l <• * * r c : >• t I J.r : .* H •? ?’t r-. * V •f'f! if. r* 3 t'^tfh*- t! t; • .•• « !•-• ;• i?p V*. 0 :•.•• >1'/. •. X.- .'•; ;v ,.:- ;; . \:..v\v ... >.. .4^;* ! ir ii) p>^.irtrfsr®?fr. I_ ^ -rr-' - A; r-- • ' ■ rw Mt. r. i; • - T • - *. i • r^>>' !:4 ^' , ,• • • • •. f.*ilP ■rrt\ : .•■J ra 7*Tv* •■ >*.' -> , -V .X- f- x. > mm 'Ur i •*i feV;. •;••.>• r.. <• / .1 •.• . • *. • ;A •* *. ‘ • ..*>, . • %r. r . -.• *. . ' .• •. * • . • *«.; V. . MIk#' t7 •V. • • ;.•••' ,9 i *.* . / a # • • •. mn • . .•> • -r- • • ••* '-•. • .*.. •'.». • • A ^ •' • \ •«...* • .•*. >/. '* *“ *• V ••4.*^* J * • • ; . *• x-i-yyj:.r/u-V •* : ■•■*..> : 'x. - . • •j * ‘ /*. * • r.^> - ^ • .4;. ...................... .. ' •* .• • ».*.? • • • • «r.r • . — "r *. V 'v: • . • : ... •. ‘ ■ .;.• ••: v••^V•^'^••^••• • ■• ■ • • -^v >> V • .."-y ; •■•: «• . ' ' ^ « - . M » • c fL L^' ^ '. * ' aiJti 0 I y (\p y 1^ « ^- e/P I • I 1 .: i I ! \1 0 5 y un a 0 I I *3 0 5 9% p vPr Q Ji i v« VT vf> (V. ■£ r • <» a ui ■5 :z V-^iy , • t Ufi-1 •s’n- '• ‘ f *» I'lul .*^4; ?>• o.-.-T », > S'V *• A* '1''^* vf ^ ; V . %*#«£• l.i^a«ii iir-ir. V i L.^ j r*^ 'MMM > 1 U A3 vT ■. • Lil 1 j I: .*•—p 4 • 1 • • 4*1 I |.i ^mm fi ^iv&l ^iS P~m ■ffi I ftpii'^\*.nv.\ui..,- } aaHpf ffipi m i-Lv. •‘ *• ^^• 5rT>!-?•■:?•■ *: r'‘»t ; vKTTT.' a*|s: r >'i*iia Bii■if hi Mill tn ••Wj5.V«:: V' J. * i •' ■ /*■• .i‘JS.; v.l ; •:'»■••■;•;%> tl .• *. /•»•>.• ;■. 1 fni-jihi k J4M I'fi-uin i \V.\V I HP. >«<i* •» V* •** PI in.'!'kin:r. »•! •. M <•I’M *4\ *vr r\v f 1»• I j I ■nffll-in i 1 al' -i.'it ; • 7. * •.•*.; • r • . • • •* ;v ' i;V* VV / t-' /Vfv in « k&iiikiil iS3 jdSi '.V-rs V/'ir; y^v;Y »'?' • V'- .• •' '.• > . . ii i.:.. ■':..■■■-7 ■ .- ii •^1m r ( • . • '■ t Zoning Distric Application - For the past i estate. The r Tanager Lake, proposed imprc steep lakeshoi into the lake The improvemei runs along the the east prop< over the lake: the east. In: stairs - note along that ar< will be ripra] designated on The trees to the wind stor: access stairs approved trea stairs. The down the stee Staff reconune to approve th permit the im Tanager Lake 1. The alter swale/dit 2. Construct 3. Removal c 4. Riprap oi 5. Removal c k!: In mm ep 1 * toi:* - rr.;':.:-. • / t'l ’l•/.•v»j 7 V ••'■ ’?• 'J..>V«;l ‘•l> •' pt.S; a V'i.p* li<V> ■>'-■ ■■r, W^r ■ m-r-:'' '•7 ^ ni i i k. ■h '■ 'T‘.7^ i ■»i •if* A o< W- ■>; ■■u WH >rr\..f^ K'’ >1 °iic#38wr ■'' '■ . ..__ 4» TO: FROM; Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE;September 15, 1983 SUBJECT;#781 - Rodney Burwell - 1100 Milston Road Permit - Conditional Use Zonxng Dxstrxct “* LR lA _ _, *?nnApplication - Conditional Use Permxt per Ordxnance 31.700 For the past year, the Burwells have been restoring the grounds of thexr estate. ^The next phase of improvement, the lakeshore Tanager Lake, will require land alteratxon wxthxn 75 of the lake. The proposed improvements will correct severe erosxon the shoreIxne ^nd steep lakeshore banks, removal of storm draxnage txles that draxn dxrectiy into the lake and concrete stairs located right at the lakes ore. The improvement program involves the cutting into of a ridge that ruL alonrthe top of the bank and the filling of a draxnage dxtch along the east property line that will now permxt the water to fan out evenly over the lakeshore banks rather than into the draxnage catch dxtch on i-he east Inspect the east property line down to the lakeshore/concrete stIir^^no^e ?hf damage ILe by the erosion. The drainage tiles/pipes along that area, visible at the lakeshore, will be removed. The shoreli will^be riprapped - the City Engineer wants the area to be riprapped designated on the plans. The trees to be removed are either dead, partially dead or damaged by Ihl windstorms this year. The concrete stairs will be replaced by an accesdstairs more centrally located on the lakeshore - constructed of aonroved treated wood. No deck area proposed for spaced wooden access stairs. The stairs will provide a gradual ascent by winding and curving down the steep bank. Staff recommendation: Tanager Lake consisting of the following steps. 1. The alteration of ridge along top of bank and filling of draxnage swale/ditch on east side of property 2. Construction of spaced wooden access staxrs down lakeshore bank 3. Removal of drainage tilfes, concrete stairs and existing dock 4. Riprap of shoreline - extent of riprap to be designated on plans 5. Removal of dead or damaged trees within 75' of lakeshore #781 - Ro September Page 2 6. Insta Approval : 1. Contrc 2, Impro\ 3. Improv 4. Entire the en Approval i 1. Design 2. Obtain 3, Hay ba! edge o; Filter when cc and fi] tnditional Use nds of their along lake. The reline and drain directly eshore. » area that ‘ ditch along i out evenly 1 ditch on lore/concrete tiles/pipes The shoreline rrprapped damaged by ►laced by an istructed of )oden access ig and curving ^ Burwell to banks of □f drainage hore bank g dock d on plans re mm K -;j’4 f-.-. ■■ . ..■yj ■: v! V ‘ tr f i-** C ; •l -.'i .. >•-P. #781 - Rodney Burwell September 15, 1983 Page 2 6. Installation of permanent dock Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Control of the erosion of lakeshore banks 2, Improve access to lakeshore 3. Improve quality of water runoff into lake Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Designate area to be riprapped prior to work 2. Obtain DNR permit for permanent dock and riprap X^’of'theli^dge tl L""a?Jered""'°'^ construction along lakeside 4. when^concrltl s?firrand ‘’~^!n?n^°" installed and fill p!acefIn ^hl frea shoreline removed ■ f .■4- vv mm wm f: , •» _ ■. i A s> s 0 p r< ctives of 9 lakeside nstalled removed rest dence :- -..1^ Attachment #1: shoreline-related Improvements (grading, selective tree removal, removal of concrete steps, dock, and storm sewer, construction of wooden steps and dock, placement of rip-rap) In order to halt serious erosion problems and provide Improved access to lake from existing single-family ll o i T7 ./ •» .'0- SEP - I 663 CITY OF ORQNO 4ittv iokii m f mh N G O O o tt sr z •-« o lU Z H CO ro 40 CD flO -i ^ CM -j o o -i in » -» u u < in M < < I Z 40 ^ q: i -i -J < z ^ in z z M M in CO tt CK CM ain o M M ^ z 22 _ H UJ UJ CO Z 37:lgS M CO cQ ^ ol a o >• >- in lu ui CM lAl> m in CO in ly X S 2X c «28§?s;m o q: CK z CO o ~ ch a r m-4 ttJ o q: iy o o M 0 3 til ^ Z «« ^ 3 CO CO UJ m lu ID CD z CM 3 o O M 1 O u u -Jz ^ ^ lii ft Ch O fO in in “»g =z < CO H < MO M M O 3 3 o .ft ft rv < o M M *4 3 UJ ft ft r ooO < ft ooO Z Ui «c X < >- \ ft < luu0. liJ CL Z H O Z X < <ft 5: < zCDft O H Hiiifiiii^ii jiiiiil' iiifi'Tr"^‘*""~ ing, )ck, dtid }} acement i and ■family ) «-• q: o o Kl tt Ui ^ Z -J ^^ IH ^ «J •J UJ UJ Ui 3 2vg§s3t ro CO cn CL CL O ^ CL O* K> 2 lA o in o cn O UI UI in (L CM h- — >• >• ^ O UI UI «:SSS m O CL CL O 3o o m4 CLo m 2 H CM Ui H I UI UI CL CL ^ ^ UJ I CD in ^ «««^ in •« in o n I- H* UI O CL CL Z UI <n 01 Ui Ui Z ft UJ K- CL < Z *“ Ui H CL CO Uf lA Z ^ c ro in in < in < H < N >- <3 O CM CL oo cn UJ Ui z cn in o UI in • UI o u)3; ::8S;oSg uHUI Ui 1 CO r q: <2< iD h-^ JO "> M < ^ -< in N^ -J O" >. S ^ ^ ^ <ofO o 3 3 3 F ^OHeiAoo, 2335 It/. St. Pmmi, 5, PUm»: 6f 2-636-460 MN.1t/uu t-300-6:^ September City of Oi Box 66 Crystal Bj Attn: Ms, Re: File ) BurweJ Dear Jeanne ;v i''*'u We have rev proval. Th the work. If you have Yours very | BONESTRpO, F Glenn R, Coo GRC:11 cn o H H UJ ^ ft UJ X v lU IV. u. M ft O O in f ■■.V .'-^ V •>ft-.v.?.:'IM A 0... ^Tnimliim^ Ct 2335 H/. 7^ 36 Si. fimtU, MimmtmU 55ff3 Plmtm: 612 - 636-4600 MN.1t/mtU 1-300-622-6573 Otto C. Bonestroo, P.E. Mobert H\ Bosene, P.E. Joseph C. AnderM. P.E. Brodford A. Lembert, P.E. Bkhotd E, Turner, P.E. Jemes C. Obon, P.E. IffflUoli September 13, 1983 SEP M 1983 1 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn. 55323 £1IY OF OROiVn • • • Cknn B. Cook, P.E. EeithA. Cordon, P.E. Thornes E. Noyes, P.E. Rkherd W. Foster, P.E. Robert C. Schunkhf, P.E. Memin L. Sorveh, P.E. Doneid C. Burgerdt, P.E. Jfrry A. Bourdon, P.E. Merk A. Henson, P.E. Ted K. Field, PE. hfkheel T. Reutmenn, P.E. Robert R. PSefJerk, P.E. Charles A. Erickson Leo M. Pewrisky Harian M. CHson Attn: Msa Jeanne Mabuath Re: File No. 139-781 Burwell Dear Jeanne, proval! ”he*atM*'to be“lp"aJp|d®“J^*Jj Property and would recommend ap- the work. >>« letter defined prior to starting you have any questions, please contact this office Yours very truly. BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:11 6917b iiWiwmmm m ; - •! V..-. ^ M:m .„^- NOTE: Bale dike to be Installed prior to construction start, 2 stakes per bale Erosion Control Dike n.t.s.Burwell Residence 1100 Millston Rd. Orono , Mn. r f ' i » ' ^ ► . • ; start. a/- .: ': y[: . :,-.t .*<■ m :i mymi Filter fabric and fence poet eroeion control dike Riprap area Cone, stairs & retaining w^ii^o'ISe removed. Proposed contours Drainage pipes & C.B. to be cutoff & buried. Exist. Trs« 2 VSHORE LINE REPAIR 1‘'«4'BURWELL RESIDENCE 1100 MILLSTON RO. Bwnnci.1. ncoiLfE«».= ORONO, MN. > w te U i'h I mm I :: i ' ym-m. rea lairs & retaining 0 'He removed. reposed contours C.B. buried. 100 MILLSTON RD. ORONO, MN. 11 s'I pi S£SO t m m it 51 •'■ -if s •■ ‘*5 ^v;.; y-. s"/ •' • fV- fe-- Cone. Retaining Ufali a Drain Pipes To be removed. 12 in. Claes 'A* riprap 6 in. Type 1 filter blanket Filter fabric and fence post Temporary erosion control el. 924.4 * r- ' / -71 Existing grade H.j- f .r ■;V.. SHORELINE REPAIR Section ff1 =2 BURWELL RESIDENCE 1100 MILLSTON ROAD ORONO, MN. " iikS^ : :v;>: V *• 11 ‘imm Zoninc Applic Bighan the Ci sometj given ask th as to The wa The wa at> the two dr the ro The Ci the CO a prop and ha not ca and th The Gi design for yo sectio draina of the on not ask th. Bigham lakeshi I wouli the la] locate! If he ( must b< be rea\ c« post control TO:Planning Commission FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE:September 15, 1983 SUBJECT:#758 James Bigham, 1545 Long Lake Blvd - Conditional Use Permit - After the Fact Zoning District - LR-lA Application - Conditional Use Permit - After the Fact - Required for erection of retaining walls per Ordinance 31,700 portions of which are located within 25* public access. Bigham constructed the retaining walls in the fall of 1982 and the City staff began discussion with applicant about its removal sometime in March of 1983. In later discussions, Bigham was given the opportunity to file an after the fact application to ask the City Council to review his request and made a decision as to the disposition of the structure. The wall is constructed of 6" x 6" treated timbers 8* in length. The wall is constructed in two Tiers with an upper boxed section at"the northeast edge. This boxed separated section contains two drainage pipes ~ one from the foundation and the other from the roof. These pipes drain onto Ivy Lane. The City has held off with the review of this application awaiting the completion of a variance application by the applicant for a proposed addition to his home. The City can delay no longer and has scheduled the application for review. The delays were not caused by the applicant but rather by negative septic tests and the need to perform additional septic test. City Engineer has reviewed the location, construction and design of the retaining walls. His recommendation is enclosed for your review. Briefly, he recommends that the boxed upper section of wall containing the drainage pipes be removed and drainage directed off Ivy Lane right of way. The remainder of the retaining wall can remain as long as the owner is placed on notice that at some future date, the City may have to ask that the retaining wall be removed. Bigham appears to be planning additional alterations in his lakeshore yard - more retaining walls within 75 of Long lake. I would suggest that Bigham expand his application to include the lakeside retaining walls and that these retaining walls be located on a survey. If he does not wish to include the lakeside retaining walls, he must be advised that a separate conditional use permit will be required at a later date. ■5 n ... onditional t - Is per located f 1982 and its removal gham was ication to a decision ' in length, oxed section contains other from ation awaiting icant for no longer elays were eptic tests ction and s enclosed xed upper oved and mainder r is placed e to in his ong lake, o include g walls be g walls, he it will m tris- r y J \\ 'i £4 5*1 v-rtf 4 wm iU 94 mm 1-m f m ii Vvio::;--; ••■c- -ay A' ;i:( 5 : ;Q/A L,- -> ■'••-■ lur:." ■■■■■■-a #758 James Bigham Conditional Use Permit Page 2 If Bigham does not wish to expand the application. Planning Commission may act on current application. STAFF RECOMMENDATION To aoorove an after the fact conditional use permit for James Bigham to permit portions of the retaining wall constructed within Ivy Lane to remain subject to the following condition : 1, Upper, separated box section to northeast corner to be removed. 2. 3. 4. ..*V' Foundation and roof drainage to be directed away from Ivy Lane and redirected onto driveway. Owner placed on notice that portion of retaining wall that remains in Ivy Lane right of way may have to be removed in the future at the request of the City and at owners expense. Owner must sign off on resolution that will contain "hold harmless" wording to protect the City from any liabilities resulting from structures within Ivy Lane. * .f. ■V;' Mya.-: ^ ' IV 'I-*' ••"A. : - .5i£f I r hx.^ i t I ^iC. A ■ t.C^' EXPLAIN \ I am struc built to l€ towat to er help south veget total both drive lake. total CONDITION I use lake the w there terra vive chang preve adjac As I have I needed build the both my n lake acce do they c iri genera ning James cted litions: 111 De id at n ny ane. M EXPLAIN YOUR REQUEST AND REASONS FOR THE SAME: I am requesting permission to allow me to keep the retaining walls I have con structed on the east edge of my property, adjacent to my garage and porch. I built these retaining walls to accomplish two basic goals. The first goal was to level out an area which was previously sloped from the edge of my driveway towards the lake. I wanted this area flat for appearance's sake, as well as to enable me to better use it. The second reason I built the walls was to help eliminate a drainage problem which was occurring both to the east and south (lakeside) of the area that I have terraced. Neither grass nor other vegetation, other than weeds, would grow in this area because of the almost totally shaded condition that exists there. Boci;;>se of this and the steepness, both to the east and south, the water running from the street and onto my driveway and down this area was washing the soil away and towards and into the lake. The building of the retaining wall has eliminated this runoff almost totally. CONDITIONAL USE AND OTHER: I use the area adjacent to my garage for both a walkway to my yard on the lake side of the house and as an area for keeping my two boat trailers. In the winter months, I keep a boat on one of the trailers and leave it parked there and I store the other trailer empty there. I also intend to use the terraced level furthest east and south for planting shrubbery which will sur vive in the heavily shaded conditions that exist there. I do not intend to change the use of the area with these walls, except that I will be able to prevent or control the runoff to such an extent that the soil from the area adjacent to my garage and porch will no longer end up in the lake. * • As I have explained in my correspondence with the City of Orono, I did not know I needed a permit to build the retaining walls that I have built. I tried to build the retaining walls in such a manner that they would be unobjectionable to both my neighbors to the east, as well as my neighbors who use "Ivy Lane" as a lake access. The retaining walls do not obstruct anybody's use of Ivy Lane, nor do they contribute to or increase any erosion problem to Ivy Lane or my property in general. #758 K ; ■ m 4 t ^ i - ■; ym H110 M Q. • Ulgo Cl. Hs OL Ul Ul H s S3u. Z 01 M ac Ul Ul CL >- O I- Ula >- os M CL Ul HI V CM III Ul h- 5 H HI >O -I O <0 N go > HI CM Cd iS I CM O CM in 0) r-l HI >- Ul f ^ CK Z t >- Ul Z I 35^i-i 3 ^ o S «« o x: qc CM c £ C Ul HI HI HI § CM O 5 • Z 01 CO O f-4 -I < rM• a *4> Ul CM QC r-i a in -I CO rH M HI O -J L CO L 0 Ul 01 -j 3 < O I O O Ui ^ . QC O (-I 5 M in 2 0^ m CM o o > HI HI Ul HI CM I CO i •H I CM CO ^ -M HI O O CO Z Z Ulu u ^ 01 01 < : Ul Ul -I 3 H H O banoxi o << 01 01 -I . >• >- O O o 1 ^ ^ ^ i to CO • K Oo Ul < >• \ QC < Ul CL Ul a £ O Z X 1=''■ ll'l ^4' ■' ■ ■ I have con- d porch. I rst goal was my driveway as well as s was to east and nor other ;he almost :he steepness, onto my and into the )f£ almost I on the ilers. In it parked > use the ;h will sur intend to i able to » the area 1 not know :ried to :ionable to me" as a f Lane, nor ny property I M > O «l o CO 0 Ul CM ^ ro CM 1 O > ^ 10 fO lA S ^ S S O IM T SS55 to < < ^ -I to 10 u u CM to O to 3 3 CM Z «>M. 10 O »0 O «J -I tH ^ 10 M ::*\i CO O o oc >o 10»oto lOsrS^iiu. £ r tt oe o »0 X Ul tu ft CM H lu U. Z o osi njifir CD !• •i 4 rH 5o.EE* M> UJ Ul Ch «0 CO CO M) « O O ^ _ •O O -I -> rM -J ,<‘ •.V O > CJ -Jo cO < H lAl »o X ro 5 CM o CO O fH I CM O C^ lO 00 f-c fO o -o p to > Kl -J lO Z Z 0 to Z Z UJ Ul Ul -I £ o o 8 < ft ft -i -I < < Ul ftft c olll§ ft Ul ft X >r\ r A'ji . , lii' E- ih'-'A.K »• \ • f"MC:/.' ... : ■]mmmn r •o ^ M UJ S ft 8 ft Ul ft £ CO M H 10 M8 Z 0 M ft Ul ft V O H ft ftft Ul ft >- OI* M ft 0 lO Oo u < 0 g H s§ O 0 . O -J 0 < CM ^ H CM < lU P 0 > to ^ to 0 0 Kl 0 0 CM I ^ . r-C -i rC I O O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 00 X r 0 < < 0 O 1 Uf i 0 3 0 0 O Z 0 O 0 -J o 0 > 0 O -J 0 O 0 0 O 3 0 0 X «i 0 ^ P 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 MM CM O -J I Z ft ft 0 O O O •H -J U U M I 0 0 0 0 9^ 0 0 O 0 0 «SS£ 0 O -I n 0 r 2355 W. *74 —A Jtif St- P—2, MImma—tt 5i PUmm. 6f2-636-36C MHW^tU f-800-6i September City of C Box 66 Crystal I Attn: Ms. Re: File Jame: Dear Jeai We have owner at We would to the e patio ar The rema any grea move the If you h • Yours v€ BONESTRC Glenn R. GRC:li Enel* 6947b Aiu UM i S /luoeieUl, 2SS5 ^O. 36 Si. M*»»M*i* S5113 plmmu 612 • 696-if6Wt MN.W^ t-tOO-622-6513 September lA, 1983 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn« 55323 Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Re: File No. 139—758 James Bigbam Ono C. tonntroo, P.E. Kobttt Koitttf. F.e. Jtutph C. Aitderlik, F.E. BfifonlA. Umt>*rt. F.E. Xirtorrf E. Tmnitr. F.E. Jtmn C. Obon. F.E. . I •j/ ^^^5 Ckim F. Coot, F.E. Kiith A. Corioo. F.E. nomas E. Hoyts, F.E. FkEtti r. Fosut, F.E. Fobtn C. Sttaakht, F.E. Mania L. SonMa, F.E. DoaaM C. FartOfFt, F.E. Jttry A. Boardom, F.E. Mark A. Haasoa, F.E. Ttd K. FmM, F.E. Mkkatt T. Fatumaaa, F.E. Hobtri F. FJt/Jtrk, F.E •harks A. Erkksoa '/ ) )/t«> M. Farrtbky '?'/ hi Harhn M. Oboa UBS 'Jit Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the retaining wall encroachnent on Ivy Lane by the property owner at 15A5 Long Lake Road. We would recommend as a minimum that the northeast corner area to the existing grade and the drain pipe he directed out the south end of the patio area onto the owner’s property. The remainder of the wall does not effect the ^ any great extent and could be left in place provided rh* agrees move the wall at some future time as requested by the City. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:li End. 69A7b CJWM K. Cook. P.t. KtUk A. COfrfo". Tkomts £. Neyft. f-S. IUctm4 W. Foutr. P.F. C. SekDMkkt, F.E. MtrvMi L. SofkHt, F.£• DoimU C. »urt0r*. F.C. Jmy A. totudom, P.E. Mtrk A. Mmwm. P F. Tt4 K. Firtd. P.E. Mktml T. KmMmvni. P.E Kobiri *. Pffffkkt- E.E. 'yCkarks A. Erkkiom \fUo kf. P»oiH$ky I Harton M. Obofl property emoved down end of the sement to es to re- ■« T UT', •tm ■ (I Wi 4. ----4.. ‘ iiij I m I k* inii i*'!Iiiliiimilini m': m t^]CATZOII OP PROPOSAL (or proporty) Addroas Ar*m CITY OP ORONO, MINNESOTA Land Uaa Application tegal Ooscrlptton Nallina ^ ™ "■■ - - —» *«iVkAU'rr ILtuMkhMlUng Addraaa (h'D/jJJ^ J Tel # ’ A/ c ^4/ Addresa Preaent Zonli^ 422li_J% gOWniTlWAt ust: APfl.lCATIOW __ 150.00 a) Roa. Acc. um ---- Jioo.oo b) Inatitutional (Church, 8ch, ---- —------Cr/Blg #/3?P.O t-nd Alteration S-it- (gradinq, fn- Ung) ---- $150.00 e) Com/ind. Use - PRD/PID . see foe schedule ---- Variance $100.00 ppi/r Present Use Pulti zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request 3L?(^n Specify Ordinance Requirements yj... tfl. ■'iXl^SkT' r ^ Explain your request and reasons for same : // VARIANCE requy^ - Lot/wea ____ Width Specify hardships to property c Front Sid explain 1Mi-Hi L juN^m application - - Residential _ _ other, explain No. of Lots XCOSDITIONAL USE AND^R . explain proposed use of property in detail -:5ZJi4- - (Must NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION (»Rist be submitted 10 days prior to Planning Commission meeting) 1. Application completed 2. Plat map section Certificate of survey of property sketch location and setbacks of proposal^ proposal ( V Construction plans, if applicable ^5^ Certified Property Owner'sloRt owners within ,(300*h (1^)- fr, Hennepin Co. DeptJ of Finance . A-603 Government Center 6.^ Stamped, legal sized enveloper(#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the,above list. (/ - / ^ /Jb^— Applicant's Signature.. l')t^ /_ _ ^ - - - - own.,.. I 5/78 ;.#758 60UN0ARY a TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR JAMES E. BI6HAM IN ALBEES LONG LAKE ADDITION N \ \\ \ If \ \ \ ♦. \ ^*JL .V .'- ■ ,.t- X Lot 17. 411 or i4 u^IcILi I^t IH 4S iescritfd in ti* ’'•c*t*l^ an^ a*M p«-t of Book i.?l 01 Rltc«’i«n»«..- MU- *; iiocwmnt No. in •ni tht loc4tioa of oil buM?rr» '*>1“ '^^'**'* L*w Addition', frt» or on Mid l«w. for pxi-pl^e* IJ *” 'tMU. oncpotchMnts, li ,n, . bmo 4..^, u. f 4 un. .,uidi.u;t \.zr/in. [?; Scot* I 1 Ircfl m *ijt 1)4 to I Ir'io-tt • « ln>« Mrtortet«, ^0 . xwf !iaa,0 (Mift* *. conih cij.,m. /yi .. Oront.rt; Ko.l?/Sj Un. ^UTi^./.rs inA iUtJiort 40IW: Um, h:r4k.-; .w Li s: © 1-1 ^ t (Tt j /»>./1 ^0 Ma 146 S 1*”— V I’ •v D T\ ■* I m % 9 % 0 i? t| !;sll Is- iillo!l|si» igoo if l"SI 5 !* W , V ;. “*40 «V |..<y ■ 4 NORTH ^7^ Pro0O«M Ork<ltk Llllii txlsttna 0r«d«9 :5T _ F«tMT« Eroded *'’••• **lpr«P.P*nn«n«fit Dock 0*t/TN \ TANAGER i LAKE EDGE Ordinary High Walar 92f.4 \ '■*'" \ "«rM:IS- ;; r Dralnase Pip«»a TMnporaryDoek.''v;.- ; f ! •; IrotlMi:Ceiitrol^ '3^'-:lr- 1$ \ I \ ;\ \ \\\ \y / >^v^l^«DlatkrbM tIftM wRhTroM/ ^ thnik* Btiif OratS— X ' V <1—____ V tXWTMO TDNM COUNT V. (SEDSHQRQLII BURWtLL 1|E9\^ >4° 01 IMPROVEMEl ; BURWELL RE9 11<^ MILLETGR *0f ORONO, MINN. ^ / • . ;...• boundary a TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR DAN PARTEN « 529 JANALYN C/RCLF ^ GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55416 W-V4- ^ II y •' I* i '•.1, rwt *.t. '«• •. !•* .,t„ ,t .'L\ I** ■> Wfj U '•« ;.,ru; ril; r,*r.TJ •Lr?.**;* **' •'■ •'•••> "*'ir •' •".... .r.-iii - .'Z^Ar'iv »»• f-s-ty ' T-JHansen 0 Rellinen, Inc ------------------------------------III ,|_r___ iy‘r «®r- PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER RELOCATION CARLWOOO.ORONO.MN OWNER-CARL PARTEN L r 955 950 945 940 935 930 COHS«UCT MH SB OVt* EUSTiNd tiN£ *IST -t«isT SAN St* st*via MH II-S y,^«0»OStO SCNVICC LOT / i i / S» n .1u r-w f ___________|li\(ST-rp¥C • fl»% . .. 955 950 I'Luta j pAlOl. » 9•^^rc# 10%940 i_________ r ■ 'NV »M * (HIST) 935 S* si 930 J*.■ i •A—L . [Fed. Proj. No. ! : ■ 1 4- S' Inc. luiiUib r^]7^ SAMITIW SCWCR MODIFICATION f CANUWOO AOOITIO**. 0«OAIO.MWNE10T« -- r--, - -TT- -■ .' ;■' ■ '■ K-K^y