HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-17-1984 Planning Minutes‘4
n
\
I
PUNNING COMMISSION MEETING
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 1984 7:30 P.M.
1275 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Council Representative - John Hammerel
Scheduled Public Hearings
1. 7:30 p.ni. #859 Dennis Kumlin, 2665 Fox Street
Subdivision
2. 7:45 p.m. #860 Funk/Rogosheske, 540 Old Crystal Bay Read South,
Subdivision
Action Iteais
3.*806
4.#811
5.-#846
6.#856
7.#857
8.#858
9.#861
10.*862
11.#864
12.#865
Preliminary Subdivision
Variance & Lot Subdivision
Conditional Use Permit -
Edward Beck, 1280 North Arm Drive
Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing
Jerry Nelson, 2565 Dunwoody Avenue
Variance - Public Hearing
Variance •• Public Hearing
Steven Pauly, 3980 Dahl Road
Variance - Public Hearing
William Bowman, 10 Willow Drive South
Variance - Public Hearing
Variance - Public Hearing
Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing
Sketch Plan Review
13. #867 Trinity Association, 1003 Wildhurst Trail
Subdivision
Additional Items
14. Planning Commission approval of August 20, 1984 minutes.
15. Planning Commission to select representative to attend
October 15, 1984 Council Meeting.
Adjournnent
nr^
MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 17, 1984. PAGE 1
ATTENDANCE 7 : 30 PM
#859 DENNIS KUMLIN
2665 POX STREET
SUBDIVISION
PUBLIC HEARING
7:30 - 7:34 PM
The Orono Planning Commi ssion met on the above date with
the following members present; Acting Chairman
Callahan, Kelley, Adams, Sime and McDonald.
Chairperson Goetten and Rovegno were absent. Zoning
Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Zoning AdminiS”
trator Gaffron, and Recorder Sutton represented the
City staff. Council Representative Hammerel arrived
at 7:40.
Dennis Kumlin was present. Zoning Administrator
Mabusth noted the certificate of mailing and the
affidavit of publication. There was no one present
from the public.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that additional
septic testing will be needed before the application
can go to the Council meeting. Mabusth stated that
this is a subdivision for the creation of one new
residential lot which will have a shared driveway.
Kelley asked if the dry buildablo was excluding the
easements.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the line
could be redrawn to acquire additional dry buildable
if needed after the easement is taken.
Sime moved, Adams seconded, to approve the two lot plat
of Dennis Kumlin finding that all standards of the RR-
IB zoning district and platting code have been
fulfilled subject to the following conditions;
1. Applicant to provide required septic test data for
lot 1.
2. Payment of park fee of $200 for newly created lot
1.
3. Access for Lots 1 and 2 will oe shared located at
the existing curb cuts.
4. Owners to provide appropriate access easements
when design of plat is finalized.
5. Dry bui Idable area to be confirmed after easements
have been taken.
Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0).
J
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 17, 1984. PAGE 2
4860 PUNK/ROGESHESKE
540 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD SO
SUBDIVISION
PUBLIC HEARING
7:45 - 8:20 PM George Funk and Judy Rogesheske were present. Zoning
administrator Mabusth noted the certificate of
mailing and the affidavit of publication. Planning
Commission member Kelley stepped down from his
Planning Commission seat because of a conflict of
interest. The following neighbors were present for
this public hearing:
Pat and Lon Doherty of 2790 White Oak Circle
Mary & James Marier of 2775 White Oak Circle
Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that access to the
newly created lot would bo via the private road White
Oak Circle. Mabusth stated that White Oak Circle is
still owned by the developer. Chuck Van Eeckhout.
James Marier of 2775 White Oak Circle presented a
position paper to the Planning Commission noting his
concerns. Marier concerns were about drainage,
parking of contractor's vehicles, stress upon White
Oak Circle drive due to heavy construction equipment
traffic, and the possible extension of White Oak
Circle. Marier asked that this new road be built to
the same standards that White Oak Circle was subjected
to when it was built. Marier stated that all
contractors' vehicles should be parked off of White
Oak Circle and onto the proposed subdivision site.
Marier stated that the heavy traffic may damage White
Oak Circle and that the developer should be willing to
pay for any damages. Marier stated that the easement
purchase agreement between Van Eeckhout and
Funk/Rogosheske provides for a purchase price of
$6,000 for an access and utilities easement. Marier
asked that this money be put in escrow unt i 1 the houses
are completed so the road can be repaired if there is
any damage from the heavy construction traffic.
Marier also suggested that construction traffic be
limited to access off Old Crystal Bay Road.
Chairman Cal lahan stated that the easement states that
the agreement between Van Eeckhout and appi i cants does
provide that upon agreement for the easement the
buyers will assume their prorated chare in the
maintenance of White Oak Circle. Callahan stated
that the agreement further states that a portion of the
purchase price shall be used for maintenance for White
Oak Drive at the time of purchase.
Rogosheske stated that White Oak Circle would not be
used when the regular road restrictions go into
effect.
MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 17, 1984. PAGE 3
i860 PUNK/ROGBSHESKE Fat Doherty of 2790 White Oak Circle stated that right
now Van Eeckhout and the neighbors are thinking of
forming a homeowners association for the maintenance
of the road.
Kelley stated that the wetlands on Lot 2 have not been
designated on the plat.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth advised that there are no
designated wetlands within Lot 2. Mabusth stated
that there is a drainageway that will be designated as
drainage easements on the plat.
Chairman Callahan closed the public hearing at 8:20
p.m.
Adams moved, Sime seconded, to recommend approval of
the plat. White Oaks Overlook finding all the
standards of the Orono platting code, RR-IB zoning
district and on-site septic code have been satisfied,
approved is subject to the following conditions:
1. Drainageway must be designated as 20* wide
drainage easements—dry areas of Lots 2 and 3 must
be exclusive of drainage areas.
2. Applicants to provide information to City as how
future owners of Lots 2, 3 and 4 will participate
in the share of the maintenance of White Oak
Circle.
3. Payment of park fee of $600.
4. Dedication of 33' of right of way for Old Crystal
Bay Road.
Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0), (1) abstention. Kelley
abstained because of a conflict of interest.
1806 WILLOW PROPERTIES
2600 WAYZATA BLVD
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION There was no one present to represent Willow
Properties. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated
that this division will create the 2-acre lot for the
Hennepin County library. Mabusth noted the written
response from Yngve. Mabusth noted that the entrance
to the library would align with the Middle School's
driveway.
Kelley moved, McDonald seconded, to approve the three
lot division of Willow Properties finding all
standards of the RR-lB zoning district, septic code,
and platting code have been satisfied and approval is
subject to the following conditions:
1. Dedication of right-of-way for Highway 12, Old
Crystal Bay Road and Willow Drive.
MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 17, 1984. PAGE 4
1806 WILLOW PROPERTIES
«811 JOHN ERICSON
1620 SHAOYWOOD ROAD
VARIANCE 6 SUBDIVISION
2. City to require underlying road and utility
easements over Outlot A.
3.Payment of park fee tor Lot 1 at $200. Park fees
for Lot 2 and Outlot B are not waived but postponed
for future development.
4.Plat road to be constructed per City
specifications up to library's private drive.
5.Wetlands within Lot 2 and Outlot B to be designated
in future plattings. There are no designated
wetlands within Lot 1.
Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0).
John Ericson was present. Bruce Goldstein, attorney,
was also present. Zoning Administrator Mabusth
stated that this application is a request to divide a
legally combined properties in a half-acre zoning
district. Mabusth stated that both lots do noc meet the
area standards. Mabusth stated that Lot 3 (required
is a half-acre) the existing area is 19,500 with a
variance of 10 percent. Mabusth stated that Lot 4 is
16,200 sf or a 26 percent area variance. Mabusth
stated the lot widths on Lot 3 (100 percent
requirement) 35 percent variance, and Lot 4 lot width
variance is 40 percent. Mabusth stated that also a
side setback variance for Lot 4 is 3* from the shared
lot line and the zoning district requires 10'.
Bruce Goldstein, Ericson's attorney, stated that by
granting the variance would in no way be in conflict
with the existing neighborhood. Goldstein submitted
a petition from adjacent neighbors stating that they
are not in opposition of the variance. Goldstein
stated that the variance has gone through a public
hearing and no opposition was raised at that time
either. Goldstein stated that since this is
lakeshore property it should be considered
separately. Goldstein stated that the MN Supreme Court
has spoken to matters regarding lakeshore property.
Goldstein stated that in the case of Gerwin vs LeSeur
County the court stated that lakeshore property is
supposed to be given special treatment because of the
uniqueness of the property.
McDonald stated that by granting variances with new
subdivisions it would set a negative precedence.
McDonald stated that 16 new parcels of land in that
neighborhood could be subdivided if this application
was approved.
Goldstein stated that the hardcover requirements
would be met.
I
I MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 17, 1984. PAGE 5
#811 JOHN ERICSON
J
ir
Kelley moved, Sime seconded, to recommend denial of
the variance and subdivision request made by John
Bricson based on the following findings:
1.To approve lot area and lot width variances
concurrent with a subdivision would establish a
negative precedent.
2.The applicant has received tax benefits from the
legal combination of Lots 3 and 4 over the years.
3.The total property has been used as one single
residential unit based on location of the garage,
access drive, and sewer line that serves existing
house.
4.Between Coffee and Hendrickson bridges along
North Shore Drive and Shadywood Road fronting on
Crystal Bay, 16 properties that are legally
combined on two or more lots could seek the same
division with varianc»j if this application is
approved, resulting in 16 new residences on
Crystal Bay.
5.A very preliminary review of the ownership
patterns of the I.R-lC district above Navarre area
shows 16 percent or 43 properties offer the
potential of divisions if this application is
approved.
6.The property in question has been used as a
residential unit receiving tax benefits for a
minimum of 30 years. The undeveloped Lot 3 is
taxes on an incremental basis, not as a buildable
lot.
7. The granting of such variances would change the
character of the immediate surrounding neighbor
hood .
8 Approval of this variance and subdivision
application would be in conflict with the intent
of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the
City.
Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0).
1
--^
MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 17, 1984. PAGE 6
1846 LEERLEY'S INC
2500 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH
1868 LEERLEY'S INC.
2450 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Bob Leekley was present. Zoning Administrator Mabusth
stated that the City Engineer would have to review the
drainage plans submitted on September 17, 1984.
Mabusth stated that one of the ponds is a designated
wetlands but would still function as a retention basin
after the alteration.
I.eekley explained that the drainage was changed by the
property owners to the east changing the grade.
Leekley stated that he wants to create a wildlife/duck
pond and that the wetlands would still function as a
retention wetlands.
Sime suggested using a swale instead pipe because
the pipe can become clogged.
Leekley stated that the pipe design was designed by
Hennepin County and they suggested that this was the
best design.
McDonald asked the proposed depth of the pond.
Leekley stated approximately 5' in depth. Leekley
stated that this proposal will not change the natural
nutrient filtering system of the wetlands but correct
the drainage problem on the property. Leekley stated
that it is a pond that will keep the top water from
getting too high. Leekley stated that his basement
had a foot and a half of water in it and that this
proposal would help the drainage problem on the
property.
Kelley stated that he would be in favor of not touching
the designated wetlands on Lot 2 but restoring the
level of water to where it was before the property
owner to the east changed the elevation. Kelley
stated that a swale instead of a pipe for Lot 3.
Adams moved, Sime seconded, to recommend approval of
the variance and conditional use permit for Bob
Leekley to allow the construction of a new pond on Lot
3, dredging of existing pond on Lot 2, with a drain tile
between the two ponds, based on the following
findings:
1.The excavation for the pond will have no
detrimental effect on the surrounding property.
2.The improvement will enhance the aesthetic value
of the property.
MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 17, 1984. PAGE 7
«846 LEEKLEY'S INC
2500 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH
1868 LEEKLEY'S INC.
2450 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH
1856 EDWARD BECK
1280 NORTH ARM DRIVE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PUBLIC HEARING
9:25 - 9:29 PM
3. This excavation will not impede the natural
drainage of the area.
Approval is subject to the following:
1.
2.
Apply for a MCWD permit.
Construction of a pond must follow guidelines
setforth in the recommendations of Hennepin
Conservation District as follows:
a) 4:1 slopes at the uppermost portion of the pond.
b) the bond depth not to exceed 5'.
c) maximum surface area of the pond not to exceed
8,000 sf.
3. Approval subject to City Engineer review.
4. Provide City with amended conservation easement
over wetlands.
Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (1). Kelley voted nay
Edward Beck was present. Assistant Zoning
Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of
mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was
no one present from the audience.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that
Planning Commission member Rovegno, who could not be
present, asked to have the Planning Commission
consider a 6 or 1 2 month reviewal period to control the
temporary use.
Edward Beck stated that the temporary use would be for
about 4-5 years.
Adams stated that the City should never allow this unit
to be rented out.
Kelley moved, Adams seconded, to approve the
conditional use permit to allow a temporary guest
house use at 1280 North Arm Drive subject to the
Iollowino:
1.Use of guest house apartment be limited to family
members only.
2.That this conditional use permit cannot be
conveyed to the purchaser of the property.
I
1
?,I"
i .
! 1 M
I
I
MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 17, 1984. PAGE 8
1856 BOMARD BECK
1857 JERRY NELSON
2565 DUNWOODY AVENUE
VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING
9:34 - 9:35 PM
1858 ROBERT HOWELLS
1448 PARK DRIVE
VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING
9:40 - 9:42 PM
3. The second dweiling unit shall never be rented
out.
4. Application to be reviewed again in four years.
Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0).
Jerry Nelson was present. Assistant Zoning
Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of
mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was
no one present from the audience.
Si me moved, Kelley seconded, to recommend approval of
Jerry Nelson's variance for construction of a deck at
25f>5 Dunwoody Avenue based on the following findings:
1. All setbacks are being met.
2.Overall hardcover on the entire property is 8,884
sf where 10,740 sf would be allowed at the maximum
development.
3. Sini lar ci edit was given in the Pluhm application.
Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0).
Mr. and Mrs. Robert Howells wore present. Assistant
Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certi f icate of
mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was
no one present from the audience for this application.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that
the applicants are requesting to build a nr’-/ home on
the triangular piece of property. Gaffron a'-ated
that over the years easements have been taken leaving
the property substandard.
Robert Howell stated that he would like to keep the
existing cabin for storage purposes. Howell stated
that there are mature maple trees that they want to
save too.
y
MINUTES OP THE PIANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 17, 1984. PAGE 9
#858 ROBERT HONELLS
#861 STEVEN PAULY
3980 DAHL ROAD
VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING
9:55 - 9:56 PM
I.;V'.ins moved, Sime seconded, to recommend approval of
the lot area and 25' road setback variance to build a
new home on 1448 Park Drive subject to the following:
1. No access off County Road 19.
2. Quit claim deed over travelled roadway and
shoulder to be confirmed with City Engineer and
Public Works Coordinator.
3. Easements over portions of municipal sewer not in
dedicated right-of-way.
4. Payment of $225.00 sewer plant charge.
Existing cabin is a non-conforming structure and
subject to all pertinent ordinances.
Waive park fee in recognition of the land area that
was lost due to road right-of-way.
Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (2). Ke! Icy and Callahan voted
nay. Kelley and Callahan tclt that the non-
conforming cabin should be removed.
McDonald noted that the cabin is used for storage and
that it is structurally sound.
c;
6.
Steven Pauly was present. Assistant Zoning
Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of
mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was
no one present from the audience for this application.
McDonald noted the hardship as the steepness of the
land.
Kelley noted that there is an increase in hardcover.
Adams moved, Sime seconded, to recommend approval of
the variance to Steven Pauly at 3980 Dahl Road for the
construction of decks to the existing house within the
75* setback line of the lakeshore allowing a 3 percent
increase in the 0-75* setback zone, finding severe
slopes on the land and the original house and
foundation are situated within the 0-75 ' setback zone.
Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (1).
Kelley voted nay. Kelley felt that the slope in the 0-
75' setback zone is not a sufficient hardship. Kelley
stated that the hardcover is too high on the property
already in the 0-75' setback zone.
MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 17, 1984. PAGE 10
#862 WILLIAM BOWMAN
10 WILLOW DRIVE SOUTH
VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING
10:06 - 10:15 PM
#864 RICHARD KAIL
2915 CASCO POINT ROAD
VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING
10:16 - 10:44 PM
William and Anne Bowman were present. Anne McCourt was
also present. Assistant Zoning Administrator
Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the
affidavit of publication.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the
applicant requests a variance to build a detached
garage.
Anne Bowman noted that they want to save the mature
trc's that are on the property and that the proposed
location of the detached garage is the most feasible
location. Bowman stated that they would have trouble
getting into the garage if it was located anywhere
else.
Kelley moved, McDonald secoi.d: , to recommend
approval of the variance (a variance for construction
of detached garage outside of the building envelope—
front line setback) for a detached garage finding that
this is a corner lot, the property has mature trees,
and the owner would have difficulty getting into
garage if garage was located anywhere else. Motion,
Ayes (5), Nays (0).
Richard and Carol Kail were present. Assistant Zoning
Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of
mailing and the affidavit of publication. Wayne and
Doris Maxwell of 2917 Casco Point Road and J.K. Bowers
of 2905 Casco Point Road were present from the audience
for this application.
Richard Kail submitted a sketch showing two possible
locations for a detached garage, both of which would
require lot line setback variances.
Jim Bowers of 2905 Casco Point Road presented a letter
noting his objection to the variance. Bowers
objected to the variance because the garage would
block the sun and would inhibit airflow from his
bedroom window. Bowers noted that the noise and odors
from the garage would bo too close to his bedroom
windows. Bowers noted that a garage could be built
meeting the required setbacks.
NINUTBS OF THB PLANNlllG COMMISSION MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 17, 1984* PAGE 11
1864 RICHARD KAIL
1865 DAREL LEIFOLD
678 TONKAWA ROAD
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PUBLIC HEARING
10:45 - 11:05 PM
Richard Kail stated that i f he moves the garage to meet
the setbacks it would affect the Maxwells on the other
side. Kail stated that he wants to move the garage so
he won't have to back out onto Casco Point Road
anymore. Kail stated that his daughter was almost hit
there by a car because of the traffic problem on Casco
Point. Kail stated that he is also concerned with the
drainage off this garage and which way it should be
directed.
Callahan stated that if the garage can be placed on the
site without a variance, then the Planning Commission
cannot grant a variance because the applicant is able
to meet the setbacks.
Kelley stated that he would be in favor of the
application if the applicant left the garage the same
size as the existing garage. Kelley stated that way
there would be no increase in hardcover.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that
with either plan there would be an increase in
hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone, to
approximately 26-28 percent.
McDonald moved, Kelley seconded, to table the Kail
variance application to allow the property owner and
staff time look into the drainage, safety factors, and
for applicant to meet required setbacks.
Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0).
Kelley stated that he could approve the same size as
existing garage but in a different location.
Sime stated that the size of proposed garage is ok an
any increase in hardcover is compensated for the
safety factor.
Adams stated that the elimination of the safety
problem is worth the hardcover tradeoff and proposed
garage size is ok. Adams stated that he would not be
for the side setback variance.
Darel and LaVerna Leipold wore present. Assistant
Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate
of mailing and the affidavit of publication. Wayne
Keller of 680 Tonkawa Road was present for this
application.
MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 17, 1984. PAGE 12
#865 DAREL LEIPOLD
#867 TRINITY ASSOCIATES
1003 WILDHURST TRAIL
SUBDIVISION
SKETCH PLAN REVIEW
APPROVAL OP MINUTES
Wayne Keller of 680 Tonkawa Road stated that he objects
to the keeping of chickens on Leipold's property and
reminded the Planning Commission that this is a
residential area and not a farm. Keller stated that
the chickens are an eyesore and make too much noise and
odor. Keller stated that his bedroom is about 100'
from the chicken shack. Keller stated that in the
winter time the chicken shack is more visable. Keller
stated that he is trying to sell his house and that the
chickens he' e become a negative selling factor.
Sime stated that when he inspected the site that he
could smell no odor or hear any noise from the chickens
but since there is a complaint from the neighbor that
he wouldn't be able to approve the application.
Adams stated that he was in favor of this application
unti 1 he heard the complaint from the neighbor. Adams
stated that he didn't notice any smell or noise from
the chickens either.
Sime moved, Kelley seconded, to recommend denial of
the conditional use permit for Leipolds for the
keeping of chickens based on the complaint from the
neighbor. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0).
John Regan and Scott Rosenlund represented Trinity
Associates. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron
stated that the west half of the property is outside
the MUSA line. Gaffron noted the problems with
changing that MUSA lino with the Met Counci 1. Gaffron
noted there are wetlands on the property.
Kel ley stated that there may not be nearly as much dry
buildable after the wetlands have been subtracted.
Kelley stated thut the MUSA line would be too hard to
try and change. Kelly stated that he doesn't feel
that anytning can be done about the zoning. Kelley
asked if the sewer had the capacity for additional
units.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the
likelyhood that no more than one or two riparian access
lots would be allowed, and that some upgrading of
Wildhurst Trail might be necessary if the proposal was
approved.
No action was required.
Sime moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the Planning
Commission minutes of August 20, 1984. Motion, Ayes
(5), Nays (0).
L-.
MINOTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 17, 1984. PAGE 13
REPRESENTATIVE TO ATTEND
COUNCIL MEETING Kelley volunteered to attend the Council meeting of
October 15, 1984.
ADJOURNMENT 11:23 PM Sime moved, McDonald seconded, to adjourn the regular
Planning Commission meeting at 11:23 p.m. Motion,
Ayes (5), Nays (0).