The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12-16-1985 Planning PacketWt' I PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, DECEMBER 16, 1985 7:00 P.M. 1275 BRONN ROAD SOUTH - OODNCII. CHAMBERS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - John Hammerel ATTENDANCE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00-7:45 P.M. Zoning Amemdment 2. 7:45 P.M. #997 Eugene Rosenthal, 640 Tonkawa Road Preliminary Subdivision 3. 8:00 P.M. #998 Maureen S. Bellows, 265 South Brown Road - Preliminary Subdivision ACTION ITEMS 4. #967 & #968 John B. Idstrom, 2580 Fox Street - Preliminary Subdivision and Conditional Use Permit - Continuation of Public Hearing 5. #979 Donald C. Wildman, 280 Wakefield Road - After-the-Fact Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing 6. #983 Walter H. Pemberton, 3580 North Shore Drive - Variance - Third Review 7. #987 R.J. Bauman, 1040 Tonkawa Road - Veriance - Second Review 8. #989 Hennepin County Department of Transportation, Hendrickson Access - Conditional Use Permit - Continuation of Public Hearing 9. #992 City of Orono - Count> Road 15 at Spates Avenue - Conditional Use Permit - Continuation of Public Hearing 10. #995 Joe Durda/Joan Anthony, 3135-3115 North Shore Drive - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing 11. #996 James McNaughton, 1800 Shadywood Read - Variance - Public Hearing 12. #999 Evan R. Meline, 3598 North Shore Drive - Variance - Public Hearin 13. #1000 Wm Wear, 2160 Wayzata Boulevard - Variance - Public Hearing 14. #1001 Charles Garrity, 2701 Kelly Avenue - Variance - Public Hearing 15. #1002 Mrs. F.C. Lyman, 825 South Old Crystal Bay Road - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing ADDITIONAL ITEMS 16. Resolution of 1986 Calender 17. Planning Commission approval of November 18, 1985 minutes. 18. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the January 13, 1986 Council Meeting. ADJOURNMENT ■i PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) /^ipo xA/^c/^fiij/j j^i'J ----------------—i ^ ^ ^ ^ t. r.ij:---------, /^ao P(- Q. /^.9d IOmIcash A. .^ ff7 4.l0S2:C£t^^^‘Col> AJ \StCW---J((o^ ^HO'-OyO Si:^- O -Hr ‘7??l 6 J^'JOLAyLXL^ -C^/ 3*^^ JVz Vk c-)Cj a !}''n-.o f^<f//S+- l.L.'C fg? 10 . /^d/^ , i7 /0>S/) \.trm k^:wiCL 7 <7 ll.Gi'f "fU-rv-,'lO ^/oX^rTuitt^.^1717 iz.wjiwZr^y?/v C(j^jjb<u^ V. /V r, 9'?9 1 3 . i f^lf C X y 7 7 g J y 7cT7 a>ty)ky~i^!UPS' ----------------—----------- —------------------ 15. L'tS GAi/i^'TS /vC^^^u viuvv r? fP kt /oo! 16. %^S- 0 dnjk 5 if2 7x^7 /e7f ■'4^!OOi- 1 17. 18. 19. 20. .Jk To Planning Commission I Pros: Date: Jeanne A. Mabusth/ Zoning Administrator December 9, 1985 Subject: #997 Eugene G. Rosenthal, 640 Tonkawa Road - Preliminary Subdivision Zoning District - LR-IB Area - 4.37 Dry 1.02 Wet 5.39 Total Acreage Application ~ Subdivision - Plat - 2 Lots - Renewal Original subdivision application received preliminary approval from Council on 5/14/84 (see Exhibit E) List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G- Exhibit H - Application - Addendum “ Plat Map - Property Owners List - Council Minutes of 5/14/84 - Rosenthal Letter of 5/7/84 Hennepin Coi nty Highway Department * s Letter of 4/24/84 - Plat The applicant proposes a division of his homestead lot totaling 5.39 acres. Both lots as proposed satisfy the standards of the LR-lB Zoning District. There is adequate sewer capacity to serve the new residential unit. Applicant has advised that new lot will be served by manhole (MH 15-11) along the north lot line or riparian lot. Applicant will provide the necessary easement in favor of new owner. The property has already been assessed 2 sewer units. The staff has recommended approval of the County's request for an additional 7 feet of right-of-way to cover any future improvement of the road along this severly curved section. Access to the new lot must be located between 75 feet and 90 feet west of the shared lot line. An access permit is required by the County prior to construction. A park fee of $200 is requested for creation of 2+ acre lot. Staff Recommendation To approve the 2 lot plat of Eugene Rosenthal based on the following findings; 1. All Standards of LR-IB Zoning District have been satisfied. ■I Zoning File #997 December 9, 1985 Page 2 of 2 2. Property has been assessed 2 sewer units. 3. Adequate sewer capacity to serve an additional dwelling unit. Approval is based on the following conditions: 1. Dedicaton of additional 7 feet of right-of-way for County Road 135 - approving a total right-of-way of 80 feet alon.^ curved section of roadway. 2. Access to new lot must follow guidelines of Hennepin County Highway Department - 75 feet to 90 feet west of shared lot line. 3. Access permit must be obtained from Hennepin County Highway Department prior to application for building permit. VSM SI i CITY OP ORONO SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM#99 Date Rec'd By Fee Rec*d 4 Si^O.oO SO <§t4JbcP . -/o Telephone ^7/ -APPLICANT Name G. I____________ Mailing Address ^^0 7onl<'^UJa U^lc^ .ti'lC\, 5~53$6 p PROPERTY Name E\MPV\^. &. RoSPVl'fhjJ OWNER ^ ^ .___________ Telephone V7/- ?0<f) Mailing Address (p^O ToiTik^UJ^ QA. ke. Mh . 5 5 ’ .5ir6 (Attach list if more than one) J ' PROPERTY LOCATION Street Address G^b TbhE^L)^ 'RA. Property Identification No. (P.I.D.) OS - 11 7 - ^ 3 33 cqq^ OlCOf^O Complete Legal Description to be attached to application EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels I Development Size 1,01 Ji . 37 Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check)v/Residential; no. of units Other (specify) _ _ _ _ _ Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) 6 Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:(Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density Units per J. Acres Minimum Lot Size:/. c Square Feet Dry Buildable Land to | of" Proposed Use: (check)1/Residential Other (specify) (OVER) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY AP 1. Application Completed 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of APiyC^IQN9 9 7 3. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 4. Stamped# legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (par)c fees# filing fee# sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements# Covenants# etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature _ _ _ Date FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I# II & III) Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivisions) $150.00 $250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) $300.00 plus 20.00/lot Final Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) $150.00* Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney# Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are usually held on the third Monday of each month. #997 ‘ f ^ - / /* /> ' ^y ■j . <^<^T'7cc7 ■OCii ^ ' '’/ ** «, /r yn, % /■y'k:i'U<-'-c-v ^’L'Y^o /i''Sr^V'£^2<^ i/ Il< 4" ^'<^'cC<y~ ■^'L^‘ 't/it . <^4tn 4. ^ rr ‘ V •^• W M 0 1 3-^ o o K•n m X m » rti H 2 m M|S33 "s!" ii:- 0> ► m K Q n r * H M a 3 C/) m m > >f Z -H O T3 5 ^ Z O m T3 m > 73 > -< > o m 25 o O 30 > O 30 a 73 m isii3 -TJ m u m > n a n > o g 3 ^33 ni ei5O 39 S oo a > r?} r* h-* o 30 X?CJ CP 25 O CT C73 o mm c/3 30 30 7^ m 0 cn 1 ii ^>>09 ^33^ mmx- 3 (/I U) ^ o M o* TI H I 03 7^ 7^ -< O O fvi O m m > m ^ ^ m m t ro Ca3 nimXX3>- H m m M ^ X M M m v< ui X m g g >ui Q X CJ1 O cn 03 25 Caj r- CD cn < C33 C3 m > 3^ m 04U1 ► o m o H X o > Q%\Jt O O CO CO -fs >r- Q35O oo o»— W1 CO H fTI 3 am 3 ism • aM rs> 04 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 14, 1984 PAGE #816 LAKE MINNETONKA HOMES 155 WILLOW DRIVE SOUTH PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION Richard Conry was present. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that this proposal meets all the septic and RR-lB zoning district standards. Mabusth stated that the three plans that Council received were access concept plans showing that these lots could be served by interior roads. Councilmember Adams noted that any other roads in this subdivision will be private. Adams stated that the only road to be public is Countryside Drive. Councilmember Adams moved, Councilmember Hanunerel seconded, to direct staff to draft a resolution approving phase II of Countryside Manor for action at their May 30, 1984, meeting. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). #823 NORTE SHORE DRIVE MARINA 3222 NORTH SHORE DRIVE REZONING ORDINANCE SETBACK VARIANCE RESOLUTION Larry Hork was not present. City Attorney Malkerson suggested tabling this until the applicant or an agent can be present. Councilmember Adams moved, Councilmember Hanunerel seconded, to table the North Shore Drive Marina variance application until the owner/agent can be present. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). EUGENE ROSENTHAL 640 TONKAWA ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the applicants will not be present and that they want the Council to act on their application. Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to approve the preliminary subdivision and directed staff to diaft a resolution. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). #826 NELLIST/SCHAPBR 3800 WAYZATA BOULEVARD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Glenn Nellist and William Schaper were present. Councilmember Grabek noted that Mr. Nellist*s wife is his secretary but that he does not feel that he has a conflict of interest. Glenn Nellist asked that the Council approve the elmination of the residential unit because no one has lived there for years. Nellist stated that it would be almost impossible to find someone who would want to live there. i i K, *■ i .>■ HENNEPIN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Av. South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 •Mi 4.iVhii s r. liw? 935-3381 TTY 935-6433 AprU 24, 1984 Ms. Jeanne Habusth Zoning Attain!sbrator City of Orono P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Ms. Mabusth: Proposed Plat - "Eugene end Nancy Rosenthal" CSAH 135 SE of Minnetonka Highlands Lane Section 5, Township 117, Range 23 Hennepin County Plat No. 1182 Review and Recofraendatlons Minnesota Statutes 505*02 and 505*03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads* We reviewed the above plat and found It acceptable with consideration of these conditions: -For any future Improvements to CSAH 135 the developer should dedicate an additional 7 feet of right of way along CSAH 135, making the right of way 40 feet from the center of CSAH 135* I •Although no point on the proposed westerly lot meets the sight distance requirements for the posted 35 nti)h speed limit, the safest and best location to avoid the embanionent and the wetlands is between 75 feet and 90 feet west of the easterly lot line* •Any new access to a county road requires an approved Hennepin County entrance permit before beginning any construction* See our Maintenance Division for entrance permit forms. •All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved utility permit prior to beginning construction. This includes but Is not limited to, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. See our Maintenance Division for utility permit forms. •The developer must restore all areas disturbed during constructlcn within County rlgho of way. Please direct any response or questions to Les Welgelt. Sincerely, <'Jstnes M. Wold, P.E. "Chief, Planning and Programming JMW/LDW:pl HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer To: From: Date: Planning Conunission Michael P. Gaffron December 6, 1985 Subject: #998 ~ Maureen S. Bellows, 265 Brown Road South - Preliminary Subdivision Zoning District - RR-lB - 2 acre Application - 2 Lot Residential Subdivision List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Survey E - Air Photo with Wetlands Designation Total Area = 7.09 acres Contiguous Dry Buildable = 4.22 acres Proposed Lot ”A" = 2.17 acres Proposed Lot ”B” =2.05 acres (with existing house) The applicants are planning to construct their new home on the northerly portion of this property in approximately the location of the existing shed. They plan to retain the house and property of Lot B and rent out that house for a period of years to help finance the new construction, then demolish the old house. Because Orono Code generally does not allow a rental house on the same lot as the principal structure, a subdivision is in order. Applicant notes that she is proposing to use a shared driveway and has discussed with Lhe County the possibility of moving the existing driveway access further north where the grade will be flatter for a safer access point. You may recall that the County requested an extra 7' of right-of-way be dedicated on the Krogness Plat in 1982, which the Planning Commission at that time denied, noting that Brown Road is classified in the Community Management Plan as a collector street and that the existing 66' width was appropriate. Since the County currently has no plans to expand Brown Road according to Les Weigelt of the Planning Office, a 33' dedication is appropriate. You will note that the proposed division line contains a number of angles in order to accomodate the 30' side setback required while maintaining primary and alternate drainfield sites for both lots, and keeping 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land for each let. Both lots exceed the 200' required width at the building site and both lots have adequate soils and area for primary and alternate drainfield sites. Zoning File #998 December 6, 1985 Page #2 The wetland/buildable land boundary was established by the applicant's soil scientist, Steve Shirmers, based on observed soil types, vegetation, and topography, and verified by staff. Although the airphoto wetland maps indicate a somewhat larger area of Hamel soils, actual borings on the site along with the 2* contour map have verified that the wetlands map is incorrect. Also note that Long Lake Creek passes through the property. City Engineer Glen Cook has reviewed the project and the watershed to determine the extent of flood plain, and recommends the edge of the wetland conservation and flowage easement be established at the 935* contour, which closely coincides with the dry buildable line. Staff has no other concerns relating to the Bellows plat and suggests the following motion for approval: To recommend preliminary plat approval of the two-lot plat of Maureen Bellows finding that the proposed subdivision meets all septic standards set forth in the Orono On-Site Code and meets the standards of the RR-lB zoning district, and that each lot is of a size and configuration that will allow the construction of a single family residence without the need of setback variances, such approval is subject to the following conditions: 1) Dedication of the standard drainage and utility easements along all property lines. 2) Welands to be described on the plat as drainage easements and dedicated to the public - a conservation and flowage easement shall be required over, under, and across the wetlands. 3) Proposed home and all accessory structures on Lot 1 must meet all setback standards of the RR-lB zoning district. 4) Applicant must obtain access permits from Hennepin County prior to relocation the driveway. This is to be a shared driveway, serving both lots. 5) Dedication on the plat of a 33' corridor for right-of-way for Brown Road. 6) Park Dedication Fee of $200 for the 4.98 acre newly created lot. LL ( ■ MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Application Completed 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owner’s list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 4 • Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and wat 2. Signed certificate of survey or myl 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. fee, sewer and Wi 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III)$150.00 Preliminary Review (Class I 6 II Subdivisions) $250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) $300.00 plus 20.00/lot Final Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) $150.00* Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature _ _I Qai3eanfe.eBiiac&Date Zl ‘ U • Date ^1 * \A * flfe Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are usually held on the third Monday of each month. u : 'I )) m s v> S A,'s, V » (ijv k'.' \ * ( * ' % • veil. • i' /t.' t.,* f• r it. ;I **, V • t »*v’< •’ ■!’ • M-i •• ■ 1 P'*i »»*>W;-i ». •»» fi V I V ivy • \ ♦ . .vt ’•r*i r%^' •< * «ic .*> •' t \ J .'^ V • 4 <v f5* A.- ,•••**. KwC.rJ j ■» ^ • ' » f I «/♦ . « ( I ,, •' ‘•S. f > ■,. ^v •?:'■♦' . * >!1'-: # 4 •• • \r9<r - /*•;' -r- t % •, V V7*yjg^> A Ht: !V ; 4 ^* .a'i •/ »...» « rt^ *rj. %. «<! > vw ■ / 'i I I »••-t> • ■■• •I. , . » I t'’ '' \v*C ‘f w*>f • •' y ' ■.? ' V i’** **fPO ICOUMTY Hwr ALIGN.)BROWN 141 ♦ ROAD 2w52d?.?fs. L^cy » /» • • •• • , ir /« > "} . * RD tV c» * < 71.1 I r »JL H m r-fc V %•- "-' ift . ' ^ ^ ’■' . y, .4 TO:Planning Commission Members FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: December 12, 1985 SUBJ:#967 John B, A. Idstrom, 2580 Fox Street Preliminary Subdivision - Second Review #968 - Conditional Use Permit for Driveway Crossing Wetlands List of Exhibits - Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey As Revised 11/27/85 Exhibit E - Staff Memo of 9-11-85 Exhibit F - Survey With Originally Proposed Driveway Location & Culvert Data Exhibit G - Septic Report (Portions included for clarity) Exhibit H - M.C.W.D. Wetland Crossing & Culvert Approval Exhibit I - Staff Memo of 10/18/85 This item was tabled at your September and October meetings pending receipt of additional information regarding the driveway and culvert, pending resolution of the question of access from the adjacent private road, and pending M.C.W.D. approval of the wetland crossing. These items are now complete. The applicant's engineer has submitted a soils report indicating that suitable areas exist on both lots for shallow trench drainfield systems. He has also provided information regarding the necessary culvert sizing for the area where the proposed driveway will cross the designated wetland in order to access the rear building site. This is not a DNR protected wetland. The Watershed District has given their approval of this crossing and culvert proposal, and City Engineer, Glenn Cook, has recommended that a corridor 32' wide be allowed for the proposed driveway, with conservation and flowage easements taken over all the wetlands on the property. Note that the proposed driveway location creates the least disruption of wetlands necessary to access the back portion of Lot 1. Applicant is requesting approval for the driveway to access onto Fox Street to serve both proposed building sites. Access easements across and in favor of each lot would be required. Note that with the proposed driveway location on an easement over Lot 2, only the area west of the driveway easement is considered in Lhe contiguous dry buildable lot area. The applicant's surveyor has re-designed the lot lines and located the proposed driveway 26' from the wetlands, and with a 20' driveway easement, the revised plan will keep 2.0 contiguous acres of dry builable west of the driveway easement on Lot 2. Also, the revised proposal keeps 2.1 acres of dry buildable west of the easement at the lower end of Lot 1, should the applicant wish to divide off a 3rd lot in the future. Note that with the current division the City will require the dedication of approximately 18.7 feet of right-of-way over the traveled portion of Fox Street. (Fox Street is platted at 66' wide, but the traveled portion actually extends a few feet into the Idstom property. ) This wi 11 reduce the area of the "future" potential lot to 2.0 acres, still meeting the 2-acre requirement. Zoning Files #96.7 & #968 December 12, 1985 Page 2 of 2 The Public Works Coordinator has reviewed the proposed driveway access location and finds it very suitable with good sight distance both directions. Finding that all requirements of the RR-lB zoning district are met, staff would recommend preliminary approval of the preliminary subdivision, subject to the following conditions: 1. Submittal of driveway access easement documents between Lot 1 and Lot 2 as appropriate. 2.Dedication of standard drainage and utilities easements at the property boundaries. 3.Dedication of standard conservation and flowage easements over the wetlands on the property, allowing a 20' corridor for driveway purposes. 4. Dedication of 18.7 feet of right-of-way for Fox Street. 5. Payment of Park Fees in the amount of $200 for the 3.4 acre lot and $ie0 for the 10.1 acre lot. Staff would recommend approval of a variance and conditional use permit for the filling of the wetlands in a 32' wide corridor in order to provide access to the rear of the property, with the appropriate culvert as approved by the City Engineer, per Section 10.55, Subdivisions 8 and 12. t LP / CITY OF ORONO #967 6e-J)(Uj>Date^ec'd 3 -<7^^ By _JtUn Fee Rec' d SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM ^ /Tr ^ l/L^^oo-"0 ^ So APPLICANT Name TO/^/U j6. A. //Telephone Mailing Address /^d>X S7^^6r . Cu^rzATA S'SS^/ PROPERTY OWNER Name S/lPtf^Telephone Mailing Address (Attach list if more than one) PROPERTY LOCATION T?9/Street Address. 2S^O ST^CfT^ £47^r7JtrA Property Identification No. (P.I.D.^ S V-//7 Complete Legal Description to be attached to application EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size y j. / /y. 5 Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check)Residential; no. of units Other (specify) _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Zoning District PROPOSAT.Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) ^ Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites;Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density Units per /S S Acres Minimum Lot Size://S^ ZSO Square Feet Dry Buildable Co.tyrf C-^4VuS Land Proposed Use: (check)X \ Residential Other (specify) (OVER) ^T«r# Immmii: l»Ts;iM H O Z1 > JZ 15ro -H !Z 5^ 0 7: H Z >0 0: 1313 H > 0 S ;g z H>0 13::: 13 CP>uc0> X X 0 > >:0 >X 0 >^ - -0 H 3ri H *D r^i 13 r: 13 m u n 13 m 13 Z u m 13 z “O ri "0 0rn >0 m >30 m >:o m >13 m >13 0\ -<>\ -<>\ •<>\-<>X -<>> rn Z 0 > m z a > m Z 0 >m a >m 0 0 Ho ;d >o a 70 >a a z >a 0 13 >-a 0 30 >C3 0 mO ZZ XJ 0 3 70 CJ 15 a 3 30 0 13 o>m :a m X3 m n m 13 fn 0o> r* ►- r- r"Ui n <j)0 04 r r> 0 z 04 tn CD X to H ol u »-•GO CO 04 fv> 0o O -< -<0>> 0 z rj CP >0^ m M 0>H 0 H Z (p r*fv>S V, Gi ^ S 9 -< ro <- N 0 > m 0 O' M -<r*Xu u > H m -< 3 04 c.t- U1o o o 0 > -<0 0 >M 0 > 04 0 m to 0 0 a a 0C E 2 2:H -n Z H •n XI fc C CP H c >0 0 4>0 1 > 0 »•>1 > 0 3 1 f z 0 >1 -H 13 0 0 17*5 </) 1/)z X r*n m T1 H Z n a C3 *—m 0 cn H »-•3 M m 3 rn to m »-*z;o (/) 0)«sJ </5 m 0 z ^ S *sj ^Ui to 3 3 m1 IN> -H r-z to X 1ro H 0 CD 8 1ro m h-l 0n 1 rv»Z 30 1f\jH 0 o3 0*CP H (P m r-JJ 04 2 04 r"04> 03 CP U1 S m H U1 0 >01 2 Q m 3 >r- to 0)tn X m tn 0 3 tn »-«(O M tn ZU104 X3 Z r\>04 3 t-»►- >to 0 z in m 04m CP m ^ m *0 m tn r-13 -4 zOi > H 0 *-• 30 c.0 H 0 tn >m 0 0ui -< >0 50 0 >0 0 >to 0 0<7^ r*0 9-^r-0 T|to 0 0 0nars50•n M H H 01 S 0m 5HZmCPmr-Q 3 l\'''S94Ti t^- 3.€i AC. m /A» HJ04TM AAHT O-:.N W .y\ /o. 3 ± AC Acs mAi 2.S iAC. tU£T 7.51 AC. OAr 2AS‘t , ' ^firopojeot / AJnc 2.5 i ACA€S CCAATftrUfiaT 2.2tACAtS fiAY Uftjr Ay A Af€M£Arr 3xqs CortiflcE^d of Survey - r X Idstrom, II of Lots 13 and 14, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 229 Hennepin County, Minnesota L’~y 753.00' _ —. V £ost earner'^ £ec.4-in-23 2.1 tACAV ffAr AtACTr Of AOAO eATe, V4C I -R 1 • io' ^er^Ajcf e^C€ cjr JO ’^CAJ £AJ€A»t£JLfr /5Q' SAAiU ik J^%\ i-38A.9i % i..w------V xor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of Lots 13 and 14, AUDITOR’S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 229, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, using plat distances from the East line of said plat to establish the Bast line of the property, and using existing Judicial landmarks,set in a registration proceeding,to establish the West line of the property. It does not purport to show improvements or encroachments , except the existing travelled road. AiASrAAAAPf AJ A£tC C/rr COFFIN a GRONBERG, INC. H Gordon R. Coffin Regf No. 6064 Mark S. Gronberg Reg. No.12755 Land Surveyors and Planners Long Lake, Minnesota Scale: Date } 1« = 200’ 4“2“84, s~23~BS Iron marker found Iron marker set Judicial landmark found 7b7>yz AA'€A = /S.S * ACAtrS 2./f ACfCJ UJ£r /o. yt /ic^e.r A?/^y //•!7~8\ Fot s-^reef ^P<joeJ as fray'sl/cd Planning Commission Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator September 11, 1985 #967 (Subdivision); #968 (Conditional Use Permit) John B.A. Idstrom, II, 2580 Fox Street Zoning District - RR-lB, Single Family Rural Residential - 2 acre Application - #967 - Subdivide a vacant parcel to create two building sites #968 “ Conditional Use Permit request to construct a drive way through a designated wetland area List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application - Subdivision Exhibit B - Application - Conditional Use Permit Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Plat Map Exhibit E - Survey The applicant is requesting to subdivide a 13.5 acre parcel (10.4 acres dry buildable) into two new building sites. Proposed Lot 1 - 7.3 acres dry (3.6 dry contiguous acres at building site); 2.8 acres wet Proposed Lot 2 - 3.1 acres dry (2.6 dry contiguous acres at building site); 0.3 acres wet Each lot meets the minimum area and width requirements. Note that the building site for Lot 1 is at the north end of the property. Septic testing has been completed but has not been submitted as of this writing. The site evaluator notes verbally that trench systems can be used on both lots. Access to Lot 2 appears to be via the private gravel road on the west side of the lot. Access to Lot 1 has not been designated; 60' corridors have been shown to the west side and to the south, leaving the driveway options open. In either case, the designated wetlands will have to be traversed, requiring review by the Watershed District and requiring a conditional use permit. No information has been submitted regarding the amount of filling to be done for the driveway, nor information about the size of culvert needed, etc. Staff would suggest that Planning Commission hold the public hearing for both the subdivision and conditional use permit applications, note any comments by the public and make your own comments, and continue the hearing to your October 21st meeting pending receipt of ^=fditional information from the applicant: •_J 0.4 :e); te); the Zoning File #967 September 11, 1985 Page 2 1. Septic testing report 2. Proposed driveway location and other engineering data regarding the driveway construction in the designated wetland 3. Written confirmation that the owners of the private road will grant legal access to Lot 2 The plat will, of course, be subject to the standard drainage and utility easements at all property boundaries, and is subject to conservation and flowage easements over the desgnated wetlands area. tJ ring any ring From V I V,' J ^ ! • * \ ’ I \ .► " , t I ^ i\(i OCT I 7 1985 i' \MCertificate of Survey ^ _ _ _ _ ^ for John B.A. Idstrom, Il‘ ^ 's Y 1;! 0, of Lots 13 and 14, Auditor's Subdivision No. 229 Hennepin County, Minnesota 3.6iAC.Oit /jl/AfMTM \ # I \ \ \ 1/ £ • • /0,/±A 2,^ iAC 7.3 1A A ^^ fiAcAtf€0 jreoc cut Mrsis^ XAiCH / / ^fircp«jec( 2.€ i ACA€S CeAjr/(fuoaI 75900'___22i £cAt cornet' 5cc.4-ll7-gJ •' I -.V *xor s.y^Ac. a„3tAc. S./t \ 60' m.fs' I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of Lots 13 and 14, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 229, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, using plat distances from the East line of said plat to establish the East line of the property, and using existing Judicial landmarks,set in a registration proceeding,to establish the West line of the property. It does not purport to show improvements or encroachments , except the existing travelled road. AS A€A c/rr AtAJ^ COFFIN & 6R0NBERG, INC. y Gordon R. CoffinReg. No. 6064 Mark S. Gronberg Reg, No,12755 Land Surveyors and Planners Long Lake, Minnesota Scale: Date I • o t 1" = 200' 4“2*84 f 8 3 ~SS Zof Iron marker found Iron marker set Judicial landmark fo\ind ToTAA A^?€A ~ /S.S £ AO ACS 2./t Acdej user so. yt AC ACS Pot S-freof ^2oa<J as travellad * IJ 'I I • A •• \ ' % t ■M-'> r ' > ' ' * /■ 1- N • to > « >( S r>* B 5 o' % rx) o" 1> 0xo too m m r\ %•-u•-SG'* CCULVERT TYPE-- —fO ro oi I I w’*!3» « _CO V>5 O Vx>OJ Mrn o «» o CP S' OO 0 U (0 o I;s INLET CONTROL' HEADWATER COMPUTATIONCn inrJ ^o i/3fO rsi in tvj ro # 3 X o ir\i 0 i>l o in o ■'A o vn o 1 OUTLET CONTROLH am O# j>v4 Co S'in O.o N > M• Otn ro rO ro t O •rJ rJ l£k ivy “ Si ro fo o <i o -> lO rO 0is o# in z # • • % « 0 % o • O -tK k rvj <7 rO•o '(O inc* VM CT ro I •O rvi•o •CONTftOaiNG HW tom Lm• * -li •OUTLETV_EE1_in in Q3 i CF 5 c CT'o S' p -CLASSORGAGE•8 !q ^\» 1 COMMENTS• • . II II o 0 S !r / ■ s i 1 E• i TO;Planning Commission Members FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: October 18, 1985 SOBJ: #967 John B. A. Idstrom, 2580 Fox Street Preliminary Subdivision - Second Review #968 - Conditional Use Permit for Driveway Crossing Wetlands List of Exhibits - Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Staff Memo of 9-11-85 Exhibit F - Survey with proposed driveway location and culvert data Exhibit G - Septic Report (Portions included for clarity) This item was tabled .at your September meeting pending receipt of the septic report and information regarding the driveway and culvert; also pending resolution of the question of access from the adjacent private road. The applicant's engineer has submitted a soils report indicating that suitable areas exist on both lots for shallow trench drainfield systems. He has also provided information regarding the necessary culvert sizing for the area where the proposed driveway will cross the designated wetland in order to access the rear building site. This information was received too late for the City Engineer to review it. Note also that applicants engineer will be bringing this driveway/culvert application to the MCWD for approval at their November meeting, with no problems anticipated. We still have no written confirmation that access can be gained via the private road immediately west of the proposed division. Although this is still a possibility, applicant is requesting approval for the driveway to access onto Fox Street directly, to serve both proposed building sites. Access easements across and in favor of each lot would be required. Note that with the proposed driveway location on an easement over Lot 2, only the area west of the driveway easement is considered in the contiguous dry buildable lot area. Assuming a 20* wide easement centered on the driveway as plotted, the area west of the driveway easement would still be about 2.0 acres. Staff has suggested to the applicant that a driveway along the east property boundary would cause less restrictions for Lot 2 and any future division to the south. As it stands now, the proposed driveway would negate the southerly portion as a future building site because the area west of the easement is less than 2 acres. (See 10.03 Subd. 6(B) and 11.03 Def. 24) Both lots meet all width and area requirements of the RR-IB zoning district. / #968 Idstrom October 18, 1985 Page 2 ^^ould recommend preliminary approval of the proposed subdivision, subject to the following conditions; 1. Final driveway access location on Fox Street to be aporoved bv Public Works Director. ^ 2. Submittal of driveway access easement documents between Lot 1 and Lot 2 as appropriate. 3. Dedication of standard drainage and utilities easements at the property boundaries. 4. Dedication of conservation and flowage easements over the wetlands on the property. 5. Payment of Park Fees in the amount of $200 for the 3.4 acre lot and $100 for the 10.1 acre lot. Staff would recommend tabling the Conditional Use Permit application pending the City Engineer's review and the MCWD approval for the wetland crossing. Note that when finally approved, the Conditional Use Permit would include a variance to Section 10.55 Subdivision 15(a)(1). i' >»-#■/ k*’ ■ - '/£■" ’ v*l ^ v ^ • , *• -• V •; , .,U ‘ :C MM-1_ »i i'*' *. r lU -•-'■'■’r.a fjf'^is £0^ m Ta -j ■• '■* i.»- >e> i ^*'1 s I •> /•i '•'“v^;^ • '’•.>’4 Pf’J.'; i S’i^7 Vv^/^ A./ .» ►, . ' :*v ’ f ''■'^* J > s , /-i :fi3i-v <f" II VIV »t.'*.>^ i "h'^'•< f/Ak 'V.*| VA-V: V f '•’i i 't' ■ mw > ■' - '■ ■ ! *-'r w'- ‘ ‘^v *i^,-W; i>mmBV ' —"i'4 ^y7 ;n: r •-'V>v' ♦ M ? V r-V^* * \> •1 • •. jf. ■ .fsfi VK. V "r*i V- ■iK-S <,'* ^P t /■ \ >' > // n ?1 Ty \> » V* . I /4>;■f r 4 >• V •'-^vV^-’ 7 ....."Mv —bOT-^4---------- i -'V'-> > ;v:>i ■Is .**! » • », 4'.'y i'...' *( m.•m H U ij ■ ■,,'} 1 iy\5 » r ■-§^; ’ >H'W »i,'* ‘viT< V* rW'- i ^ -A I • c ; •# rv’y L Jf’ »* -W » l» t »' / * i r ’"^" i; " • ' ♦ ♦. «« > • .», ;;r-f -7> V A. W i--'r^. .r f r ' >i • .'4 .-b w .-• y mr™ j... . v^' i^'* JR, %. \m ♦ . • &: •i> Bi;ry" ■ :.-'''r ;V•■• ■■• -y'■ ;r-crr>.^^.\ • ♦ E -■\ . "^vy * -wt, •rf • *-*v^ i, ; tc '■■■S' ■'S54 r. V jL^;_ 4 ^ •. ik% f‘> K \ ^ 4 • . ^ i ii' ‘ .y 4 ’.r ..ilMlBi:r iniKSHi ^‘v 31? fej'-’ *'''.’:i..nlj,. i^*^f^W>l ■">*<^1 -- ' f}a% ‘^- ■ " 9 * -i^,v ■”•“ 143*'' 7 , N srSf W.. f \i.5 M. Utf'Si " ??i.4r ^ "V-'' • '^' '.' .' ^';-—r-1 ^ ' • *V1 ■ ■^^'V.;--' -J * -i ■;t’rl:S3 '' i .‘ %-■ W FOX SI-*. p. • STREET ■“7T V WW 1 S • -;!> /i if. t■£> tV'' kH I.!;- i I* ■ • ■ irk?':' 1 k-" ■ i m ^ W4--ftimm V t ■ '* ■ ^7. <>•'- ’1"-'% f • ^ r^* « N To: From: Date: Planning Commission Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator December 9, 1985 Subject: #979 Donald C. Wildman, 280 Wakefield Road - After-the-Fact Side Setback Variance for Accessory Structure Zoning District - RR-lB Area - 2+ Acres Application - Side Setback for Tennis Court - Constructed without building permit Required = 10* Existing = 7' Variance = 3' or 30% List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C ■ Exhibit D - Exhibit E ■ Exhibit F ■ Application Plat Map Property Owners List Septic Report Gaffron's Review Survey Review of Application Planning Commission tabled all action on application at their October 21, 1985 meeting, pending receipt of survey confirming setbacks of tennis court. The substandard setback has been confirmed at 7'. The survey also confirms that the tennis court was constructed over the alternate septic test area. Applicant has submitted additional septic testing confirming suitable area for future expansion to the east of the house. Staff recommends approval of the after-the-fact setback variance application of Donald C. Wildman based on the following findings: 1. Most affected neighbor has not appeared in opposition to the location of tennis court. 2. Suitable area for septic expanison has been located on property. Approval is subject to the condition that ap*’: i.'^ant obtain after- the-fact "penalty” permit for tennis court at.'57>7.25. Sni4U..j / > t s; s.. I CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION f4^.r ’ {JcbUa.y^(lf C>0O cJc.p(pCy f- ^ i/O Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional project) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ^^0 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Please check one — Is the property abstract or torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included iOn required survey. s. 3^6 APPLICANT Name /it-J] f/f^Phone y7i>' -C'^ir Mailing Address / ■I ■ Name mi Phone 2* Mailing Address Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) ^o no^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Jf /f" Present Use of Property _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Residentia Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost Describe request in detail: 4 Pc',/0 io//o/rrH //t Li/.- tI? T'/,^ G'tr/A'c^r/ /' O ///uz/cl 0-d*/(/ Y y y/ TV-* /^ c** //:*7 ~ //A^c‘y j VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear) (OVER) HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict' enforcement of zoning regulations: DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS _ _ _ _ _^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ At''CS^ JO/JC J'T' ^^ ^//// “ J~/t . REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 34 8-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Flat Map. mm mm mm m mm mm mm mm mm <mm mm mm, mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm « mm ^ mm mm mm mm mm mmm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mmm mm ^ ^ mm w mm •’m ^ mm mm mm mm mm mm ^ mm mm mm ^ ^ mm mm ^ mm The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/hei kn^i/ledge. / • ■ ^ / J Applicant's signature ^Date 9/uU( OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. / Owner's signature >> / /r V'TT k . / ^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. TO: Jeanne A. Mabusth raOMt Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administer DATE: December 9« 1985 SUBJECT! 280 Wakefield Road - Alternate When the Wildman’s constructed the tennis court, they effectively lost the future use of their previously tested and approved alternate drainfield site. We are now in receipt of a soil boring log indicating that suitable undisturbed soils exist directly east of the house for use as future drainfield. This is an area of relatively sandy soils, and while we could expect no problems with the existing septic system for many years, there is room to replace the system should it ever become necessary. r 12-9-85 SITE EVALUATION REPORT FOR DONALD WILDMAN OF LOT 4, BLOCK 1, WAKEFIELD FARMS SECOND ADDITION ORONO, MINNESOTA On November 30, 1985 one soil boring was taken to the northeast of the existing drainfield area to see if sandy soils were present like those found previously on much of this lot. The soil boring contained as follows: Depth(feet)M* arial 0.0-0.5 0.5-1.3 1.3-5.5 5.5-6.0 Black Loam Dark Brown Sandy Loam Brown Sandy Loam Brown Clay Loam No mottled soil or water table. Thus, the soils found were much the same as those before ana this area near the new soil boring would support a future drainfield site if ever needed. Sincerely, fERCOR, JNC. Mark S. Gronberg PCA certified ■ = f - Iv SI N *«• * \\ \\ tl'1 1 \. N> ^1 To Fr« Date: Planning Commission Members Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator December 11, 1985 Subject: #983 Walter & Marilyn Pemberton, 3580 North Shore Drive Variance ~ Third Review List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C * Planning Commission Minutes of 11/18/85 - Notice to Applicant of 11/21/85 - Revised Proposal Meeting General Guidelines Stated by Planning Commission on 11/18/85 Exhibit D - Conceptual Sketch of Proposed House With Neighboring Houses (not to scale) Exhibit E - Memo From Tom Jacobs, Building Inspector The applicants have given consideration to a number of proposals and the one before you falls within the general guidelines set up by the Planning Commission at your November meeting, as follows: 1. House 24'x44'; ‘ garage tuckunder off-set 5'x20'; driveway with backup ap^on. House set 3' back from existing front line (and 3* behind Fegers). 2. House portion ends up 10' from lot line and 16.5' from Fegers house. Garage portion ends up 5' from lot line and 11' from corner of Feger's house. 3. No average lakeshore setback variance required on north side. 4„ Deck in front encroaches only 1' into average street setback, and is 20' from assumed R.O.W. line, and 33' from edge of pavement. House is 28* from assumed R.O.W.; 41' from edge of pavement. Since our yard setback requirement does not specify where to measure when the street lot line does not exist, and defines yard area required as 30* in this case, and the area between the deck and the pavement is 33' of open space with no structure, doesn't the deck actually meet the yard re quirement? 5. Plan requires minimal fill/cut in 0-75' setback zone. 6. Hardcover limits set by Planning Commission at November meeting are not exceeded. (Calculations at upper right of survey.) Two further items of note: first, from the standpoint of consistent action, your recommendation on this application will likely affect your recommendation on the Meline/LaBresh application two doors down (#999). Secondly, I am informed by Building Inspector, Tom Jacobs, that the panelized construction building proposed has not been approved by the State Building Code Division as meeting SBC/ICBO standards. The builder, David Nelson (Woodmark Homes), has not to our knowledge provided the information to the State that is needed to gain State approval. Unless the con struction method is granted approval by the State, the proposed house will not be approved for construction in Orono. Hence, there is a possibility that a different home will ultimately be placed on the site. Because of the "building-specific" review of this lot tc ate, it is likely that a house of a different "footprint" configuration would require another variance application. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 18, 1985. PAGE 1 ATTENDANCE 7:32 PM Is and >y the f with and 3* "•egers ner of i. k, and House r yard street n this f open rd re- aeting Lstent t your #999). It the State David mation s con- B will bility use of that a nother CONSENT AGENDA* The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present; Chairman Callahan, Rovegno, Goetten, Kelley, McDonald, and Taylor. Sime was absent. The following represented the City staff: Building and Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Peterson. It was moved by McDonald, seconded by Goetten, to approve the Consent Agenda* as submitted. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #929 LYLE RAHN 1146 WILDHURST TRAIL CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT THIRD REVIEW Chairman Callahan explained the request for a conditional use permit for guest cabin usage subject to the hardcover being made as conforming as is feasible and applicant addressing the drainage problems both of which have been submitted in Exhibits B & C. Lyle Rahn was present for this matter and stated he had no objections to staff's recommendations. It was moved by Rovegno, seconded by McDonald, to recommend approval of the conditional use permit subject to staff's recommendations. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. (^9833^ALTER H. PEMBERTON 3560 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIANCE - SECOND REVIEW Chairman Callahan explained the request to build a new house and noted the four optional site plans submitted in order to reduce the degree of variances needed. Walter & Marilyn Pemberton were present for this matter. Marilyn Pemberton stated that they had the existing structure inspection which was found to be totally out of code with a bad foundation making it unuseable. She noted that the main problem was the need for 22 * to back a normal car out the garage. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the four optional site plans with the commission. Lou and Marilyn Fegers, 3590 Shoreline Drive, were present and stated that their concerns were the possibility of grading being done between the two houses and that the proposed house will stay in line with theirs. They stated they had no objections to a new residence being constructed which would improve the area. i\ Marilyn Pemberton stated that the shape and style of the proposed house conforms aesthetically with the lot size. rs2iii#^ MtT«rcX«H»] tTfl :T#Ta:- "f7:lF rami [•KM sviira PAGE 2 he hous etback. red bu ‘ teeded ti eighbor,! i presen the siz^ be used lling t< o build [cover bj te planii table tN ^nceptua based oil 0. e setbacl 3 pool. om Jurge: e setback loted a: t on th tter. Mr ated tha .ch shoul be store CITY OP ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ZONING FILE NO. 98 3 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 473-7357 Date of Notice: 11/21/85 TO: Walter & Marilyn Pemberton 4567 Gaywood Road Minnetonka, MN 55343 TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Variance Date of Meeting; 11/18/85 COPIES TO: Vote:For 0 Against Planning Commission recommends the following: XX Tabled: For reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Subject to submittal of a ravised plan under the following conditions; 1. (Granting lot area and lot width variances.) 2. 5* setback to Fegers lot for garage (tuckunder). 3. 10* setback for remainder of house. 4. Maximum 0-75* hardcover of 20%. 5. Maximum 75-250* hardcover of 52.3%. 6. Limit fill in C-75* to only that necessary to accomodate garage and driveway backup aprcn. 7. If necessary to accomodate driveway, remove portions of right side deck. 8. General Planning Commission direction was to meet the average setback with the front 8* deck. If front of house is in line with Fegers house, a 4* wide front deck would meet the average setback. The question remains, what is the point at which we measure the front setback? The edge of pavement? The edge of the actual road easement? How wide is the County Road easement on your property? (Note 8* deck as proposed is 31* from pave ment, 18-19* from assumed R.O.W. line between adjacent lot pins, and 1-2* closer to road than Lamont*s house.) This is certain to be an item for discrssion. Finally, to confirm, we will meet in this office to discuss the next steps at 2:00 P.M. on Tuesday, November 26, 1985. Zoning File #983 Notice of Planning Commission Action November 21, 1985 Page 2 of 2 ist Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Planning Commission December 16» 1985 If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire certified copies of the official Plaining Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. )wing 3date right I erage line erage ch we ge of ement pave- pins, in to s the / *pcn njafcr- %■ yn Certificate of Survey for Walter H. Pemberton of Lot 7, Block 2, Daldur Park Hennepin County, Minnesota / y / ^ iS*'****' " S Nr.vrt.'A'f 'tOT 5 C / / / / / />8>2-r s.- ‘//eo ^ n.sYa I / l.n^ TS’ir^ •7S-ZSO* • i*. ^ TOO oecit. /^/(^ -TSfVo r 5-/.S /. / w %■ X'f L^: I.0A T5' Sr««n Sau 3k9r%,f,0»‘ G*■*y I hereby ^rtify tha^x^ms is a true a^d corrpj^ represent ation of a the boundaries \\ lot 7, Dlocy#<BaIdur Park, the location Q>^11 existing buildings, \\ / .1if any,-hereon, and the proposed location of a proposed house, garage, and driveway. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. V WWMmm i*’> »•»•/* s>sm ■*m .*'•'.a COmw a GRONBERG, INC. S; Vir\ wrv- ,j* t* Mark S. Gronberg Lie. No. 12755 Gordon R. Coffin Lie. No. 6064 Engineers and Land Surveyors Long Lake, Minnesota .V X LAKt MlNfJETaNkA Seale:1 inch B 20 feet Date :September 25, 1985 0 :Iron marker ■“EH7- :P''opciec\ Contoor -----‘?J4 :EM'sftn^ Coffhoor #G83 [•Kft] Ai •I«I#I [9^ mm] [•■•1 l•TtV•l lOira To: From: Date: Planning Conunission Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator December 11, 1985 Subject: #987, Robert Bauman, 1040 Tonkawa Road - Variance Second Review LIST CF EXHIBITS A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D- Survey with proposed pool - (staff revised to show . consistency with plans submitted) E - Survey prior to currently permitted additions including hardcover calculations F - Survey showing revised driveway and adjacent houses G - Plans, Elevations of proposed pool H - Staff memo of 11-14-85 I - Plannning Commission minutes, 11-18-85 J - Preliminary Lakeshore Landscape Plan The applicant has submitted plans and elevations for the proposed pool as you requested at the November meeting. As d'ncribed previously by the applicant, the roof of the pool addition will be tne same level as the existing deck. A portion of the pool addition roof will be used as deck. The pool addition will extend 16* further out from the protruding room on the lake side of the house. The proposed plans submitted show the "footprint” of the pool addition slightly revised from the original survey. It will cover 85 additional square feet of currently non-hardcovered area, and eliminates a portion of the 205 square feet previously proposed as trade-off, hence we actually need to remove 290 square feet of hardcover of which only 165 square feet is available plastic for removal. 125 square feet must be removed elsewhere on the property. Note that the plans also show a 10' x 12' future deck which would require additional hardcover removal. Where does applicant propose to remove the additional hardcover? Staff has flagged the corners of the pool addition as proposed. We suggest that the Planning Commission members view the property from both the Noelting's and the Gasch's properties in order to envision the extent of actual view encroachment which would be caused by the pool addition. Applicant has provided a preliminary lakeshore landscape proposal, and will be submitting additional landscape elevation drawings for review of his application #945 (for work on the lakeshore) at your January meeting. Zoning File #987 December 11, 1985 Page 2 of 2 Based on the submitted material. Planning Commission is requested to recommend approval or denial of the variances for the pool addition to allow tradeoffs in hardcover (remain at previously existing 39.4% in 75-250' zone) and to average lake- shore setback. In order to recommend approval, possible findings include; 1. Applicant has a hardship in that there is no other feasible location for the addition. 2. The addition will not substantially encroach on the lake views of neighboring property owners. 3. The applicant has shown that he can remove existing hardcover so that there is no net resulting increase in hardcover To recommend denial, possible findings might include: 1. No hardship exists 2. Excessive encroachment into lakeshore views of neighbors. 3. Excessive hardcover with no way to decrease to within reasonable allowances. r CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION (j%^0 Q.i. r?/cj'7\ /peri h Oet Ti/'^-fLh Oa ^VS*) Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional project) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address lOHO rd , orq^q Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) QS~1Q—A Please check one — Is the property abstract or torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Phone Mailing Address ) ^ _____7 ^ A//f ^ <4^ ff /? /3_____Afitf ^ OWNER Name Phone Mailing Address Date Property Acquired I (do) ^o no^ //ArAy (month/year) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USB OF PRO^^BRTY Present Zoning District _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail Estimated Constriction Cost % S ^23 1 VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front Hardcover mm Side Rear) Other (OVER) i ! HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement^f zoning-.regu" /I. JlatjAnsj:br DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1, Completed Applicatioii..FQrm • • * -j- ,\ . • 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150 * (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) % 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10 } pre-addt essed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct tc the best of.,4vis/her knowledge. Applicant's signature OWNERS SIGNATURE E>.4vis/her knowledge. Date The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date /ohrsS Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting, Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. I4 ' I• / ■•• m rj (lO^ /q/i >• I _ east ,41 ss fc' < ,(i^->• I 41 4 10^1 1» •\0- ClkST «‘3S Wst ^(^0 O • 2|<«-l-i J, ^ 2lSG(i5>£AST k \ X>-'OvV«:\- \'»« ■'-'jf »fcll Oi .V '';70 (•! N|4®3 o*^-|J 7 uql3 LOT 18 t.\o *1 LOT 17 tjg> tji — liT'UlE LOT l« — ------------------------- lULZll^—f.-----1 -^, f 'CP t > ^\ Sco Part ol LOT IS (D 'Mi s'V24£. i ‘C t t ^ \V t?*<4~c ll o*\ **» \o 'A,- its 0 />\ I k^'t OUT lot 71 7 7 Ail 4T (l CARLWOC 0 '^' A> sx>' » * " J . . (7}\ (. 1 4l5Ji.’22i7 4* r^86 f4Sr -;v I V ./iZ^ \east ov> WtOfLOf 7 / ,i\ \ \ \ \r» «l l\. \ - vt V 4 «*r O O » H •n m m _ m w H ni M §53 Ol Hm r- 2 H H m m M X > n ti XigM"* 05 H ^ 2 m -< Q n M O 3 oi m m ► -ti u H a► M m |S33 m m > 01 CSC si 3"g m a m 05 nmg CO H O I/I V i r— —' o o O CD 03 Q) 3 ro -5 (Q cn —^ « oi o 3 n> 7T w di 3 Oi fio O PO QO 2 50 50 O. cn cn Ca/ cn OI "O 3 O) o» n rh -j. n> Oi 3 3 "O Oi rt* n> 3 r- —' o o O O Oi Di 3 r>o -5 iQ cn —» —• Oi o 7^ 3 0) « Oi 3 Oi Qo O 50 Qo X5 Q. cn cn Ca> cn cn •a Oi -o rt Oi (D rr 3 rl- r> 3 ( Ca5 00 0 00 1 I ro CJ ro 4:^ o o o 4:^ GO 00 O 00 I ro CO ro 4> O O O cn H o ap§s3 a m u m > a g m X B a > o 5 3 aa m X o* O p O Q O -4 O H H n X o o o o cn a o o ro Oi Oi —- V£) 3 3 r> ID o fD n> 3 Oi —- —• < Oi 0« O 01 —• —35 0® —• 3 C O) 50 ^ O 3T C —*• c4* 2 3 tJ 3T 2 Oi cn cn 4i». 3 rt- "o 3 Oi n> 3 Ca> 00 0 00 1 I ro CO ro 42* o o o ro 1 m - o & X M3am m > a \ •< > m X o a > o 3 a m aa o a S o a r* »-« c. c« o M§ssss* Q O Cl o rv> m m o o Hif C/I </l H H> M M2lp;! s8S cn vn 14 Q o §ls»o m c. 14 a o o o H o apiS3 a m a m > a V. •< >> m X o o a > a o 3 a a m 05 ►A Oo O' a vn o H G X O 14 ss®or- gi o o o» I H ►- in in a > o a sir 14m a H a o > o r- o c.m a o ui 0» c. o m^ arssa_-4 ni m o» I a o Q MMX m m X H H 5 ^ N N ► H •- I m H a o o o Q a a o v4 *?8p ~* n m a ^ -4 H X 0» c. a ►- H ►--•"gr C. f- 2 fvi«si|ir o o o C4 o > Hft! rv> V. 05 N 2 3 O amg a H O •< a lam a cn cssg Ms cn -< ini a a 3 Sg 25 ® a • aM ►- 14 a o I i ;C - » »♦ # a J 1 »<x * r Planning Commission Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator November 14, 1985 SUBJECT; #987, Robert J. Bauman, 1040 Tonkawa Road - Variance ZONING DISTRICT - LR-IB, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 1-acre APPLICATION - Request for average setback and hardcover variances to construct an enclosed swimming pool. LIST OF EXHIBITS A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Survey with Proposed Pool E - Survey prior to currently permitted additions including hardcover calculations. F - Survey showing revised driveway and adjacent houses The applicant is proposing to construct an enclosed swimming pool on the lake side of his home, requiring variances to the average lakeshore setback and to the hardcover regulations. Mr. Bauman is proposing hardcover tradeoffs which will result in no net increase in hardcover in the 75-250* setback zone. You will recall that the applicant appeared before you in August requesting permission to work on the lakeshore bank. The Council tabled that application pending applicant's submittal of a professionally done landscape plan for the bank area, since it is steep and likely subject to erosion if distrubed. That applicantion has not yet been completed. Also be reminded that the applicant was issued permits for the construction of a garage addition and small room addition with hardcover tradeoffs prior to the Council's directive that all such tradeoffs over the 25% limit are subject to a variance application. These additions are nearing completion and the excess hardcover has been removed. The applicant has relocated his driveway within the last year. Also, as a result of the need to revise grades in front of the new garage, and in anticipation of this application for the pool with hardcover tradeoffs, the applicant had the driveway apron redesigned so there would be a net decrease in hardcover nearly equivalent to the area of the proposed pool. At the advice of staff, applicant has installed the new driveway apron this fall prior to freezeup, to ensure safe access to the house. At this point, if applicant removed the 205 s.f. of plastic at the north side of the house, he could add the pool structure with no net increase in hardcover from what was there originally when he bought the property. ^ - ^ r The other variance requested for the pool is for average setback. The pool structure will encroach approximately 15' into the average setback zone. Applicant has not provided elevation drawings to show the height or configuration of the structure but he has stated it will be no higher than the floor level of the existing deck. The neighbor to the north has expressed some concern about the sight lines and views which would be encroached upon. In your site inspection you should view the subject property from the neighboring property to ascertain the effect of the proposed structure on the views, and also note the location of the fence on the north boundary. Also, looking at the most current survey. Exhibit F, note the relative locations of nearby houses. Any recommendation for approval should discuss the hardcover tradeoffs, and the justification for granting the average setback variance.41 pile Si . >■ MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 18r 1985. PAGE 2 iy. #983 PEMBERTON continued Commission members questioned the possibility of the house being centered on the lot to meet the 10' side setback. Marilyn Pemberton stated the house could be centered but the garage could not be because of the necessary 22' needed to back out. Walter Pemberton stated that the other adjacent neighbor, Don Lament of 3570 North Shore Drive, was unable to be present but had no objections to a house being built. McDonald felt that the plans were too ambitious for the size of the lot and that the existing structure should be used. She noted that the only variances she would be willing to recommend would be lot and width area variances. Taylor, Kelley, and Goetten, felt that the request to build a new residence was appropriate. Taylor agreed with the intent to minimize the hardcover by centering the house. Kelley proposed a combination of the optional site plans submitted as follows: 5' variance for the garage 20% hardcover variance in 0-75' 27% hardcover variance in 75-250' removal of deck if necessary to center house fill and grading - to be reviewed with staff lot area and lot width variances It was moved by Kelley, seconded by McDonald, to table the matter until the December 16th meeting for conceptual approval upon the submission of one site plan based on Kelley's previous proposal. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. ^87 ROBERT J. BAUMAN lOAO TONKAWA ROAD VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 8:19-8:52 ^ ..w uChairman Callahan explained the request for average setback and hardcover variances to construct an enclosed pool. Chairman Callahan read into the record a letter from Jurgen Stielow of 1020 Tonkawa Road opposing to an average setback variance being granted. The letter also noted an "assortment of unattractive" vehicles in sight on thej property. Mr. & Mrs. Bob Bauman were present for this matter. Mr. Bauman, referring to the unattractive vehicles, stated that after the garage is finished being constructed, which should have been done two months ago, the vehicles will be storedj inside the garage. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 18, 1985. PAGE 3 #987 BAUMAN continued Mr. Bauman stated that he felt that the proposed plan conforms with the average setback based on all the area properties. i Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron pointed out that the average setback is determined by the two adjacent properties only and, as shown in Exhibit E, does not conform with the average setback. Gertrude Noelting, 1060 Tonkawa Road, was present and stated the proposed pool would be "ugly" from an outside view and felt it would diminish the value of her property. She stated that there is space to place the pool in another area. Marge Gasch, 1030 Tonkawa Road, was present and stated the pool would encroach upon their sight line and would effect their property value. She invited the Planning Commission to visit her home to view the sight problem. Taylor stated an aesthetic landscape plan should be submitted. Chairman Callahan stated that elevation plan should also be submitted. Commission discussed various options for placement of deck and pool building. The Commission generally felt that the hardcover trade-off variance would not be a problem. There were no other persons present to speak on this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to table this matter pending landscape, site, pool building, and elevation plans. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #988 JAMBS B. MBRTBS 3237 CASCO CIRCLE VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 8:52-9:15 Jim and Ruthmary Mertes were present for this matter. Chairman Callahan explained the request for renewal of a lot width and lot area variance, which was previosly granted to owner, Douglas Smith, in February 1984 per Resolution #1607 Doug Smith was present for this matter and stated that the applicant's, Mr. & Mrs. James Mertes, bought this property contingent upon renewal of these variances. Jane & Jack Remien, 3235 Casco Circle, were present for this matter. Jane Remien stated that they were unhappy about this because the lot is too small, as is their lot. •:a • * «, > % Dw > \ • • >v .?• 4 /J, • 9 t \ I V I %^||.'‘,V ‘^1 .Piffi;« j-^jSti T.7 * •'; ’ •£ i' rflU r. • V Tf ':/* '.- fv) .. ;■ t-' ■■ n •' '". jj i ;t<J ‘,t /■, f ■> •i r^, ‘1 ^1 I *il;VAVr'%\ 1 5 ^ 5^' >Ai‘- ’f| .4 C rA 'J * A •.ft •■■■ ./» ru> ■ "U . m i; ■ U ^ 2k -Jki. 'i f *•)s *'■'> >. /> ^ :. < ■* I'',T^t !fi^!f' T-\i-Hiin . K .^i. . ..*•' i. Ni ' iV r pm l>ll;. R:f;^MU'r; f 7 1^. ' •! ■if - ' M ^ "I i<t'-F-' m *r '■ ir^ ,i •1 •ff5 ?* '■' <1fcl '. j. / fJ»i . ^ 'V'" ;-..??it\!M 'Is 3 hi f:'ll^ r';- 1 » '7- V •• < . ♦ ti‘ . 1- i : r- i.- *V • I » •- . % i To: From: Date: Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator December 10, 1985 Subject: #989 Hennepin County Highway Department of Transportation Hendrickson Access - Conditional Use Permit - Second Review List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Ault's Letter of 12/4/85 Exhibit B - M.C.W.D.'s Letter of 11/27/85 Exhibit C - Staff Notice Review of Dredging Issue The State Supreme Court in the case of Rex Welsh vs. the City of Orono determined that the DNR had complete and sole jurisdiction over all matters dealing with the dredging of the lake bed. The City may require a conditional use permit if dredged material is to be used on land portion and a variance if the material is to be used within 75 feet of the lakeshore. If material dredged is to be removed and not used as fill, the City has no jurisdiction over the matter. Per your directive, Mr. Ault advises that dredging is required to obtain navigable clearance adjacent to proposed seawall - prevent stacking out in bay area creating traffic problems. Dredging will also involve the removal of existing rip-rap adjacent to shore. Dredged material will not be used for backfill; granular fill will be used as backfill. My files confirm that a DNR permit has been applied for also. Please note a permit has been approved by the M.C.W.D. Lights are not proposed with this project but may be considered as an independent project sometime in the future. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit application of the Hennepin County Department of Transporation for a proposed seawall of approximately 126 feet in length along the shore line, adjacent to the Hendrickson boat ramp subject to the following conditions; 1. Pentachlorophenol treated timbers to be used in construction. 2. Granular fill can only be used for backfill - dredged material to be removed from site. 3. A geotextile filter fabric to be used behind the metal seawall. 1 4 j i I1 J HENNEPIN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Av. South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 935-3381 TTY 935-6433 |V{\ December 4, 1985 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 86 Crystal Bay» Minnesota, 55323 PROPOSED SEAWALL AT HENDRICKSON ACCESS: NORTH ARM OF LAKE MNNETONKA (ZONING FILE #989) Dear Ms. Mabusth: We have reviewed the notice of planning commission action for the above project which was sent November 20, 1985. The proposed dredging Is for removal of existing riprap and to obtain sufficient depth for navigational clearance adjacent to the proposed seawall. Dredged material will not be deposited In back of the seawall. Granular backfill will be used. The dredged material will be taken from the site. We have filed a permit application with the DNR. Installation of lights Is not Included In this contract. However, this Issue could be considered under a separate contract. Most likely this would be arranged directly with Northern States Power Company. We do not have any monies budgeted for this Item at the present time. Should you have any additional questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Cl.dT' Hydraulics Engineer JEAimak HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer • 1 I ! ' '‘ i i V'^ ij . /i t ' • t > I •» ___ 5 MSIMIVIEHAHA CREEKLiEft •W > \ ‘ ; u DEC - 5 1985 ^r i r * j WATERSHED DISTRICT (.' 1 (v;, , ---------tm «iNimoNKA P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 •0A*0Of MAMOIIS: David H. Cochran. Pros. .Albert L. Lehman .John E. Thomas Michael fl. Carroll .Camille 0. Andre .James B. McWeihy .James R. Spensley •ermit Application No: 85-173 Date: November 27t 1985 Owner:Hennepin Co. DOT 320 Washington Ave. So. Hopkins, MN 55343 Location: City of Orono, Sec. 8CDD, North Arm - Lake Minnetonka Purpose:Replace an existing timber seawall with a metal wall and perform dredging to facilitate access to the Hendrickson public access. Dear Mr. Ault: At the regularly scheduled November 21, 1985 meeting of the Board of Managers, the subject permit application was reviewed along with the following exhibits: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Permit Application 85-173. Cover letter dated October 15, 1985 signed by J. Ault, Hennepin Co. Hydraulics Engineer. Request for comments from the DNR, dated September 25, 1985. Specifications for the project dated September 10, 1985 prepared by Hennepin Co. Title and plan sheet for the project, dated November 1, 1985 prepared by Hennepin Co. The Board approved the permit application with the conditions that: 1. A geotextile filter fabric be used behind the metal seawall. 2. Granular fill only be used as backfill behind the wall. The Board further recommended that vertical wooden bumpers be provided along the seawall to prevent and reduce damage to moored boats. This permit is valid for one year. If construction is not complete within one (1) year, an extension must be requested. Please contact the District at 473-4224 when this project is about to commence so an inspector may view the work in progress. EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Eng i news? f oiy t he/,D i it r t MlchaeTAT*^ Date of Issuq^ ^ bt cc: Board G. Macomber ^Boudreau, DNR ^^€lty of Orono i CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ZONING PILE NO. NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 473-7357 Date of Notice: 11/20/85 TO:James E. Ault COPIES TO: Department of Transporation 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins, MN 55343 - 8468 TYPE OP APPLICATION: XX Conditional Use Permit Date of Meeting: 11/18/85 Vote:6 For Against Planning Commission recommends the following: XX Tabled: For reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: The permit does not cover the proposed dredging but the Planning Commission has asked that you explain the need for dredging. Please contact the DNR for the necessary permit review, I have also been asked if you plan to install lights. Please advise before December 13, 1985. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Planning Commission December 16, 1985 If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. 1 .11 To:Planning Commission Members From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date:December 11, 1985 Subject: #992 City of Orono - County Road and Spates Avenue Conditional Use Permit and Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 - Conditional Use Permit required for land alteration Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - Variance required to fill or grade within 75 feet of lakeshore. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Property Owners List Certificate of Mailing Affidavit of Publication Sketch of Lake Access Road Profile Elevations Review of Project The City proposes upgrading Spates Avenue lake access. Fill will be placed within the 14 feet wide access in order to raise and level out the elevations up to County Road 15 approach. Cars will no longer have to accelerate up the severe slope to get out onto County Road. A level stopping area will be maintained for safe use. The total amount of fill to be installed will equal approximately 44 to 50 cubic yards of fill. Note the proposed and existing elevations on road profile. Staff is working with marina owner to east side of access to remove both LP tank and any other obstructions deemed hazardous for sighting. Judy Boudreau of the DNR has advised that a permit is not required because fill will not be placed below the 929.4 elevation. Jim Mahady of the M.C.W.D. advises our engineer that formal permitting may not be necessary and because of the limited amount of fill may be administratively permitted within the next two days. Staff recommends to approve the City of Orono's application for a conditional use permit and variance to permit filling and grading within 75 feet of the lakeshore based on the following findings: 1. Improvement will result in greater safety for users of lake access. 2. Improvement will facilitate access off lake. «»•. Zoning File #992 December 11, 1985 Page 2 of 2 Conditions of approval: 1. Staff to work with marina operator to remove all obstacles deemed obstructions to sighting. 2. City to use all necessary erosion control measures prior to and after improvement. J 4 10-117-23 42 0012 .««»> 1 • * i O /a\V{.', I,./\(<;^ Ac^c I' k^-' Ivi >1^% «*'.N • r ’ ,;• ••ii’•{; ’:• ; t•4 1 »*.i i;$ i j •i i•i •• 1 ;: ; . i i r »!; j i • .,j *f ; t , : r 1 < j « ) : ■;{ i j :s !••; i • ;f t 4 : •i • i : 4 i • j ? •• ..»: •• •i i ;i 1•,j »•i To:Planning Commission Members From: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator December 12, 1985 #995 Joe Durda & Joan Anthony, 3115 & 3135 North Shore Drive - Conditional Use Permit Permit or approval to remove trees over 6 inches in diameter within 75 feet of lakeshore. Zoning District - LR-IB Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 - repair of seawall requires conditional use permit. Section 10.22, Subdivision 3 - permit required for removal of mature trees within 75 feet of lakeshore. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Application Property Owners List Plat Map Sea Wall - Steel Sheet Preliminary DNR Permit Sketch of Lagoon Area The applicants propose maintenance dredging of existing lagoon and channel area that is shared by both properties. 1550 cubic yards of fill is to br dredged and removed from site. The wooden sea wall on Durda's side of the channel, approximately 224 feet in length will be removed and replaced with rip rap. Durda plans to rip rap 617 lineal feet of additional shoreline to prevent further erosion into lagoon. Durda plans to construct a permanent dock within lagoon. Mrs. Anthony will replace deteriorating wooden sea wall of 114 feet with steel sheeting sea wall - see Exhibit D. The three of the four mature trees in question have been removed because they were leaning over the house. The code says that Council must grant permits for such removal. In the absence of a formal procedure, staff recommends approval because of the safety factor and in addition will ask the owner to plant replacements (at least 3 ) within his lakeshore yard. Zoning File #995. December 12, 1985 Page 2 of 2 Staff recommends approval of a conditional use permit for repair of existing sea wall and the removal of four mature trees within the lakeshore based on the following findings; 1. The existing sea wall was deteriorating and creating potentially navigable hazards and erosion problems. 2. The trees were in a hazardous condition and posed a threat of property damage. 3. DNR has reviewed the application and will approve the permit as soon as City completes sea wall review. Conditions of approval are as follows; 1. Dredged material is to be removed from site. % 2. Durda to plant (three,four) trees within lakeshore yard. 3. Applicant to obtain building permit for sea wall. i r t?:; ‘I" V Ir i f £. ^CO 'C! w r’ CITY OF ORONO ^5^00 5 GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 3115 North Shore Drive, Orono Property identification Number (P.I.D.) 0911723320013 RLS 269 Tract A & B Please check one - Is the property _ _ (for Conditional Use Applications only) abstract or X torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Clifford Reep Phone A75-1816 Mailing Address 16820 Edgewood Avenue, Wayzata, MN 53391 OWNER Name Joan Anthony Phone A71-9A51 Mailing Address 3115 North shore Drive, Orono,MN 55391______________ y Date Property Acquired _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) I TtlcT (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITION7UL USE PERMITS _ _ _ _ $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg X $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 ^^f^P^^and Alteration (grading, filling) PRD/PID - see fee schedule Other Applications $250.00 Vacation $250.00 Rezoning / oo iOO $-200-r0t) Appeals Other - see fee schedule . 4 PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY^ , * Present Zoning District LR-1B Present Use of Property Single-family Residential Other (specify) d on DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST f T\ccs To he rv 3 fltvc. Tlst ho«4J& ^// u/t/l: Describe request in detail: g a^-fer i^orK hm bgg/i <ia/v (eTc.d Remove existing deteriorated wooden seawall and replace with a steel sheet pile directly behind the existing wall. The new wall will be constructed first.__________ then the old wall will be remove, inorder to prevent the possible erosion of the shoreline durring construction. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. Certified R.L.S. acceptable, as per our conversation on September 5, 1985 5. Construction plans, if applicable. 6. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of M-s/her knowledge. ^Date //Applicant's signature OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of thi(^ request. Date Applicant must hav*^ all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Me'=‘ting, Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. fcA: Z,' r.C. /3 r.;-, ^7 Owner's signature n -I 1 H 3 H m > \ -< > m o JJ o ;a 3 oi TJ ^ > r- ^ n 0)0^ §3z om *xj JJ > z o o » m > n is*”*" (/) ^ J™^ m o ;a r\> vn ui XI X o a m o ui w U1 3 X3 S CM 0> M) I I r» Ui 3 -o U) i 1^ m > \ -< > m a XI o X3 o> o U1 5 O m Tj X3 > z o > a 3 XI m H O *T3 z > 5 XI ? X i o 3 *o m -o m > XI V -< > > m Z o o XI > CJ a 3 X3 XI m H Z > > X 3 -D m > N •< > m a XI oz §s•-S om *D XJ > z a > o 3 XJ m H O Zz > s z 09>> X 2 o H3 z m z nm > z X \ >> m 2 O oo z > o o 2 3 *>4z m c/i S M Zo M O CM CM 0> O cn So m o o O 9^ XI 1/1 cn r\> cn M o m zo S 3oc M cn H S 3 o c Mcn H m H > O 0 1 Z > -< CM C. O •- > U1 z C. O CM O CM 09 > H- C. Zs H Z o73 m >jI rv> CM CMro cn cn CM m Ml _ XJ > “H Z I H X C/I o o 5 X) o JJ z M < m 0 vO 1 > »-* z z •-• -1 O >1 X XI I O H fM Z X CM -< C/« CM X rsio XI o m o a CM XI Z CM > •- -< o N O H X cn Xo XI CM m I— o XI cncn X X m XI c. m ,5 m XI XI m m > XI r- O CM CM 09 O o o M) I 1=: H X s S £ M > o -< Ml N O H Z m 09 o CM m m CM 09 H H O *1 «0 -K -< O O Ml m m I XI i O > -H m o cn \ 09 cn oz •si I rv9 CM CM M o o o M9 2x cn X cn o cn z CM m M9 ►- O Z cn n z H- > o 3 •g I f\9 CM z m M 3 z 2 ui cn X 3 m CM n a ch z ^■x 1 1 • I 1 y I m > Hri X ;os o o >i a ><Hm o KJ\ \ 0>vn . ” f^‘'^\../ . 4'.’ ' i'. ■ ' ''•''>•'•■ • * -4 '.^4 SUPER7 8 10 12 K '»*. • * . r • - I . ^ * * ■ . • - i- »• ,v * v: . 4 *• «' *v ; ■ •. 4j .v/il’i-i ;• •: V4r.s' ("t* ^ k .‘.\ fit 4)^;-> The new standard of quality for light weight steel sheet piling for permanent and temporary structures that speeds work and reduces costs. from the people who know Superior Filing, Inc. steel sheet piling best I* O Ilnx 1S% !."> IManI ( t|J) UUi-M'Mi ('tii4'itf;«>. lllincis 4;ot»|K Offi -t?: (JIJ) nj.i \1 inufut’turt’rs anil Snpplu’rs »»f .sh<»r**lin«* I’lixIm iH SUPER 7 8 10 12 • STOPS EROSION • RECLAIM WASHED OUT PROPERTY • RE-ESTABLISH PROPERTY LINES • KEEP OUT MUSKRATS AND PESTS • BEAUTY AND DURABILITY INCREASES PROPERTY VALUES IN STOCK FOR IMMEDIATE PICK-UP Super Piling Cut to your exact lengths. Cap Angles Stocked in various sizes— Tie Rods #4. #5. #6. #7 size rods. Deadmen Variety of structural shapes in stock. Fabrication Complete fabricating facility for your convenience. SOME TYPICAL APPLICATIONS Trench Shoring Retaining Walls Groin Walls for Beach Erosion Earth Dam Core Dikes and Levees Ditch Check Dams Spillway and Flood Control Bridge and Culvert Wing Walls Shoreline Protection Erosion Control Seawalls and Boat Slips Left-in-Place Concrete Forms Cofferdams Machinery Foundations Bridge Decking SPECIFICATIONS 6*'V.............. - Wgl (Sq FI ) VVgl (Lin FI ) Sec Mod (FI Wall) SUPER 7- 7ga.9.6 14 4 2.67 SUPER 8- 8ga 8.8 13.2 2 6 SUPER 10-lOga 7 2 10.8 2 2 SUPER 12- 12ga 5.6 8.4 1.65 • ♦♦ u-Pf* « ESTIMATING CHART No. of No. of Piles Wall Feet Piles Wall Feet 1 1.50 20 30.00 2 3 00 30 45.00 3 4.50 40 60.0046.00 5 7.50 50-90.00 6 9.00 7o:'•:;’l 05.00 7 10.50 80 120.00 8 12.00 90 135.00913.50 10 15.00 100 150 00 ■\au Superior Piling, Inc. IVO. Mox IH .;ir, Illinois IMttiil: {M2) Offit f; (:H2) H2 \ DISTRIBUTED BY in STOCK “inn-i'innnm olc-4 7-l-0'CO4 rurbUdnv ninnc^uva unapwi permit application, letters, paps, and plans subaitted by the applicant and others supporting data, all of ahic are aade a part hereof by reference, PERHISSION IS HEREBY GRAITEO to the applicant naaed beloa to change the course current, or cross section of the folloaing: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Protected Mater Lake Minnetonka 27-133P (Crystal Bay #21) Naae of Applicant Joe Durda and Joan Anthony County Hennepin Telephone Nuaber (include Area Code) (612) 448-6789 Address (No. t Street, RFO, Box No., City, State, Zip Code) 3135 No. Shore Drive and 3115 No. Shore Drive., Orono, MN. 55391 Authorized to: A. Maintenance dredge 1550 cu. yds. of silt from existing lagoon and channel; remove 224 feet of wooden sea wall; riprap 617 lineal feet of shoreline; construct permanent dock; B. Construct 114 foot steel-sheeting retaining wall for TITLE REGISTRATION all as indicated in application and plans received August 8, 1985. Purpose of Parait: Navigational access and erosion pj;otecti^n Property Ocscribtd as: SECT. 9, T117N, R23W, Specifically: A. RLS #1113 Tract A B: See attached metes-ft boundsHennepin Date of Parait Expiration Novemb er 30, 1986 County As Indicated (9): (if applicable) The Ordinary High Water Level - 929.4 NGVD.1929 This perait is granted subject to the follouing GENERAL and SPECIAL PROVISIONS: GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. This perait is peraissive only and shall not release the peroittee froa any liability or obligation iapose' by Minnesota Statutes, Federal Lau or local ordinances relating thereto and shall reaain in force subject tc all conditions and liaitations now or hereafter iaposed by lau. 2. No change shall be aade, without written peraission previously obtained froa the Coaaissioner of Natural Resources, in the diaensions, capacity or location of any iteas of work authorized hereunder. 3. The peroittee shall grant access to the site at all reasonable tiaes during and after construction to authorize representatives of the Coaaissioner of Natural Resources for inspection of the work authorized hereunder, 4. Ihis perait nay be terainated by the Coaaissioner of Natural Resources at any tiae he deens it necessary for the conservation of the water resources of the state, or in the interest of public health and welfare, or for violation of any of the provisions of this perait, unless otherwise provided in the Special Provisions. 5. Construction work authorized under this perait shall be coapleted on or before the date specified above unles! terainated as hereinafter provided. Upon written request to the Coaaissioner by the Remittee, stating th reason therefore, an extension of tiae aay be obtained. 6. Ihe excavation of soil authorized herein shall not be construed to include the reaoval of organic aatter(a. indicated above) unless the area froa which such organic natter is reaoved, is iepervious, or is sealed by iie application of bentonite after excavation. In all cases wh.^ . the doing by the peroittee of anything authorized by this perait shall Involve the taking, using, or daaaging of ?ny property rights or interests of any other person or persons, or of any publicly ounev lands or iaproveaentc. thereon or interests therein, the peroittee, before proceeding therewith, shall obtain the written consent of o’’ .lersons, agencies, or authorities concefr.cd, and shall acquire all property, rights and interests necessary the'^fore. 8. this permit is permissive only. Ho liability shall be imposed upon or incurred by the State of Minnesota oi any of its officers, agents or employees, officially or personally, on account of the granting hereof or or account of any damage to any person or property resulting from any act or omission of the permittee or an. of its agents, employees, or contractors relating to any matter hereunder. This permit shall not be construef' n Mkic iurs» ode) ipote' ict t( Lirces. trixe for »r for unles' ig th' ter (»v td by •king, OMnev obtoip rights ota 01 or or or an. istruer' shall be placed on any portion of the bed of said waters which lies oeioaias inoicaceo looYtMf appiicaw.*. . Any eitension of the surface of said waters resulting froa work authorized by this peroit shall becooe protected waters and left open and unobstructed for use by the public. . This peroit shall becooe effective on the date it is recorded in your County in the Office of the Recorder. Provided* the work affecting protected waters authorized herein shall not be coaaenced until a * tlca of Paralt has been conspicuously posted at the construction site and a copy of the recorded peroit is posted on or near the preoises upon which such work is conducted. A Notice of Peroit will be issued by the Coooissioner upon his receipt of a Certified copy of the recorded peroit. . All general and special provisions of this peroit shall bind the peroittes, his heirs and assigns and shall run with the land. . After the coopletion of the project authorized, peroittee shall supply the Oepartoent of Natural Resources with photographs of the project area. . Peroittee shall oaintain the authorized project in a stable and safe condition. At any tloe the Coooissioner . finds that the project is subject to instability, creates a navigation hazard, has becooe a public nuisance, or has fallen into a state of disrepair, he shall order the owner to repair the project within a specified tioe. # . Any Coooissioner’s Order teroinating this peroit oay also require the peroittee, at his own expense, to reoove , uithin the tioe specified in said Order, any authorized project constructed under this peroit and, if applicable, any unauthorized project in violation of . this, .peroit. Said..prder shall also require the peroittee to »-estore, . if necessary* the protected waters or beds thereof to the condition existing before the unauthorized ictivity. This peroit does not obviate any requireoent for federal assent froo the U.S. Corps of Engineers, 1135 U.S. Post office and Custow House* St. Paul* Hinnesota 55101. SPECIAL PROVISIONS . The permittee shall comply with all rules, regulations, requirements or standards of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and other applicable federal, state or local agencies. . Permittee shall ensure that the contractor has received and thoroughly understands all conditions of this permit. . Erosion control measures shall be adequately designed for the site characteristics. They may include staked haybales, diversion channels, sediment ponds, or sediment fences. They shall bo installed prior to commencement and maintaining throughout project. All exposed soil shall be restored (by seeding and mulching or sodding and staking) within 72 hours of completion of project. . Excavated materials shall not be deposited or stored along side the protected water in a manner where the materials can be redeposited into the protected water by reasonable expected high water or storm runoff. : USCOE - MINNEHATTA CREEK WSD - CITY OF ORONO - LAKE MINNETONKA C.D. - HENNEPIN SWCD - JIM KONRAD. C.O. - ST. PAUL HATERS - LAKE Of MiA01A Of this day of bscribed and sworn to before .e this day of N*_ _ _ _ _ _ coawission expires: . 19 CONNISSIONER 0f HINNESOTA DEPARTHENT Of NATURAL RESOURCES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - otary Pubic Signature v. l0nIA,7Kni| AAAM OTA • V 1959 $ Authorized Signature Kent Lokkesmoe - Regional Hydrologist To Planning Commission Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Date:December 9, 1985 Subject: #996 James McNaughton, 1800 Shadywood Road - Variance Zoning District - LR-IC, 1/2 Acre Application - Hardcover variance to pave driveway and backup apron. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Sketch of Request by Owner Sketch to Scale by Staff (On Survey) Hardcover Calculations Staff Letter to Builder 9/27/85 Resolution #1718-A Duane Barth's Letter of November 1984 You will recall that the vacant lot at 1800 Shadywood Road was allowed to be built upon per Variance Resolution #1718-A approximately one year ago. The new home is substantially completed now. However, the new owner, Mr. McNaughton, is requesting a variance to allow 36.4% hardcover in the 75—250' setback zone (rather than the 25% allowed) in order to constiuct a paved driveway rather than the "grass paver" or "strip" driveway, which was originally proposed in order to meet the hardcover requirements. Remember that developer, Duane Barth, in the original lot area and width variance application, stated that he could meet the hardcover requirements by using an alternative type driveway. Mr. McNaughton now claims the 'grass pavers will not be suitable under a full-year usage situation and in this climate, which may in fact be true. Staff knows of no location in the area that has installed "grass pavers", hence we have little to go on as far as their suitability for driveway purposes. At this point, the driveway is graveled approximately in the con figuration Mr. McNaughton would like to pave. The gravel was placed with out staff review and the applicant was notified after its placement that it exceeded the hardcover requirements. The applicant was given the option to remove the gravel and adhere to the 25% limit or to leave it in place temporarily (thru the winter) pending the result of his variance appli cation. Given the fact that a lot area and lot width variance was granted than a year ago, and that the original applicant was very aware of the City's hardcover concerns and requirements, is there a hardship shown now that would justify a variance? (NOTE: in Resolution #1718-A note that hardcover is limited to 2280 s.f. or 25%. The surveyor's subsequent calculation showed that the lot is slightly larger than originally calculated by staff, and 25% is 2444 s.f.) r‘ .CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION ^ t •• ■ ;9o-' Initial Application Feo(§150.00 ($50.00 per each additional project) After-the-Fact Fees (Doul3Te"application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION « • Site Address Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) P?-",J|V< V' Please check one — Is the property abs torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name JJ/? a/Phone Mailing Address O _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OWNER ^Phone A/iy-7/77-^'y/^ / Mailing Address _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date Property Acquired ^ //f?_ _ _ _ _ (month/year) 9 ^ I (do) (l^o^o^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District ^ Present Use of Property _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (^sidentiaj.>> Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request Estimated Construction Cost $ ^ in detail: ^jQ'jjyeJ? VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area « • Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear) (OVER) HARDSHIP DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY QOV!Q\^TO}AS ired \ _ _ __ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ /A^ \^y^/7^' yp(^^c^-^S y^^cr' REQUIRED SUBMITTALS (Tl^Completed Application Form. qv-2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) Stamped» legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. .... V ^ Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. ^j^5. Plat Map. t The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all i~'formation required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best-'61^ hi s/her know^dge. Applicant' s signature OWNERS SIGNATURE Date // //>7^ The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of^his reauest. c~ jr /S-^/ / /■'T^— /-/c ’/zu 7C'^C- / Owner's s i gna t uf e //:?/// / ///./. _ _ _ _ _ _ Date ///^^ ^ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. //f /(^crohl ^■ Icurutllt I'SlO 'oVAai^\Oa:)d'\2d . Oav(za'Va , 0r\ W V (V\^r ^ ■ “SaV^eoi 'SWocio.uiocA UOo^M^cda , 0T«O ^hody^-^ood 'Bd l/da^-z.'^a^ WO ObhA P. (turtle i‘?>HO ^V\Q^ Uv^QC(i • l0av|-2O:^, laran^ j G)\Q)idif^& dhn l-hr'f'i^ ^ /7§0 S/'P^uiaJoo^ [j£.(OM ! lOfeIpK'e. Khs^arcQ ^ ix\{() 5S’5‘=^5 / iOayzcdnd^/d 'cioS'i / rn. I7‘^0 S^OauiOoO Br(, R)c.\(2crf^, /7/U Oobefi' €}■ /^.uucl lg^^ ^^r,a:huxod Id . (/}?yz<jfa ^ /^/u 5‘5^‘^Z dlwr/es /!■ ^/e 3r. fS^'O Shdd'jyiXXfd ]dJ zoh mk lOidiafti 770 S MOov/'sd'Q (2d-H en^^-"S\acK loood \^c . SOTft r LAKESHORE REGULATIONS AND HARDCOVER "LR-lB"SEC. 10.22. REGULATIONS FOR "LR-lA", "LR-lA-l", "LR-IC AND "LR-lC-l" ONE FAMILY LAKESHORE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT^ Within any ”LR-1A ”, “LR-lA-1", “LR-IB", “LR-lc", or "LR-lC-l" One Family Lakeshore Residential District the following regulations Shall apply: Subd. 1. Lakeshore Set Back Regulations. The set back from the shoreline for lakeshore lots shall be at least 75 feet and no building may be located closer to the shoreline than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent and nearby lots. Subd. 2. Lakeshore Hard Cover Regulations. Within 75 feet of shoreline there shall be no excavating, filling, hard cover, temporary or permanent structures. Within 75 to 250 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hard cover. Within 250 to 500 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 30% hard cover. Within 500 to 1,000 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 35% hard cover. Subd. 3. Tree Removal Regulations, No trees within 75 feet of the shoreline with the diameter of six (6) inches or more shall be removed without first obtaining a permit from the Council. HARDCOVER LIMITATIONS 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000 ’ Zone Zone Zone Zone Hardcover allowed 25% Hardcover allowed 30% Hardcover allowed 35% Hardcover allowed Percentage of hardcover for each zone is calculated as follows: Area of hardcover in zone (sq. ft.) X 100 =Percentaqe of Area of lot in zone (sq. ft.) hardcover in zone NOTE: Measure setback distances perpendicular to the shoreline, not along the lot line. * •>» .• •. ■* ^ * j* 5T o I' ?■ 1 £ -1 8 *1) V- . a ffv\ I i O 0 11 c; % c -T) cnc -< O V* 5 rnc I 0 1 t POs r t? > •5r- ^ W DO ! O O rtrt>»dEl**tJWaWS: i-nHtO D»*-(X>1XH (t> M O N O Oi O T3 a'O H- o» j : o o o w H* ro w o cn o I-* a fi> < (0 3* (D DJ X H- Qi (n C) rt C n X p- H- rt H* < W 3* 0) (t ® ft H* (t H* ^ H- 3 H- 3 P» 3 3 H (/) O H- < 3n> ^ »i (0 (0 M H- 3 3* 3''0 O {U (D (D O fi> fii a Di h( flj Qi *ia f o ft M DitJ O O t o < (D i-J ? O / fv s H o s (A 'O (D O (U (A (A H* 0> D*vQ H* fD •-• (A H* O Qi (D aiQ »< iQ (t vQ ^ a » 3*a a a: ro 0) 0i Di t{ M .Q M tA a a »i OiTJ o n tt n n> <; o o ® < H* !-• (T) Hi 0) H H- H O (D 3ft nj < (D H O O < CD H O < (D O <n> •i > H (D (T) H O (D 3 ►dn> H o (D H 3 H- 3 H- (t ft p. rt 3 P- 3 N O 3n> (T> O a 3* n> O (A CA o (t Ml c 3- 3 (0 0 3 O* D» ft a Qi (0 '■ Qi P* P- 3 ^ ft p P- 3 O vQ 3 Q Q P* < rt 01 < D> H P Q 3 O (0 3 0J 0> vQ O (0 03 O (A (0 P* (A I I H* Hi Qi P* ft < 3* P- (0 a O (0c n (0 (A H 3* O O (0 C 3 3 3* 0) P* ft C 0) h a 0) 03 o 3 (0 ft 3* (0 H p. 0 *D t» (0 H *d N O 01 (0 < O 3 0 3 ft Oi (00, w I 03 I (0 o P* 3 P- 3 I Qi 3o n M Qj 0 P* C P- It C a < 3* Qi (0 p- (0 (0 (A Qi t( (A (0 rt H ft 3* rt 01 3* (0 3* P* (0 (0 3 1 (A 3 P-iQ C 3 C <0 h (0 p- Oi 3 N N O 3 (D (0 X P- (A ft P* P H (0 <0 (A c p* rt P- 3 ^03 Ml D P P (0 3 T> ^ P (0 M M (A rt (0 p* 3 3 O O O 3 n c M M (0 3 P rt rt N p< 3 ft|> O' P (D ft o 3 B (0 3 3 O ft P- 3 n M (0 p p (0 M (0 3 O < P 3c p* ft p- o 3 •-J (0 u> I (0 'J X M u> n P Ui (0 >o (0 cr Qi*< p (0 :r 3M M p-oa P 3 P* M "O 3 ft O M a o 0 |> O Ml 'O (A OPS'* (A 3 *0 (0 Qi O Oi Qi O (D 3 P O P C Ml X* 01 P P (A Qi ft O *• P* P- f3t rt »0 CA H- P N p- O O 3 3 P D* (» P‘< • i-i o o p o o an> sC P p X* (A N O 3 (D I P* 3 O P da (D (A ft 3* (D rt O rt P P a p G ro ro 3 M <03 3 0 3 0 pm 03 p* Ml C \ 0 0 G 3 P-0 0 P ft <ro ft p* p*3* 3 d 0 Mro• p 3 3 P B rt roX < a M G Mia P 17 ro (n ft G|o Qi B iQ MlIraro 0 G tfc ro 0 3 M 3 ft P O'0 ^ *1 0ro0(0 3* d ^ M ro 3 < Ml 0 ft •X 0 a ro ft B Ml P 1:ro 0 P 3 rt M 3*0 03 p p P N 3*ro 0 ro ro p ro p 0 a ro a B X p 3 p 3 p-0 M -• p- Ml 3 d d $ p Ml 3 0 d p 3.H-rt M O' C P* Pa p O' p (D P P 3a a p- M (0 O ft P- O 3 P • • OI to tl % > 7^ Li >c 07 I cn Hi cn Hi oN cn Hi N?0> u> U7 Ln I to Ln o 0 1 •o Ln li.» Ml im, % ^ cn Hi m 44H1 p Ml roo NO oN o> N Si 0 nX Hm0 I/' cn An Hi cn Hi 0 cn Hi SI 0. O' n; ui 0^ tSJ O a a cn w •-3 a >n a o* > X5 a a a o a a p> 3 N o 3 (D p a O X rt p- p p ft M P- (0 3 P O) P< 3 N o 3 (0 3* a P X H P* Oi P n ft o P* < 3(0 OJ M a Q >O • W 3 X M P P-J3 o ro o 3* a P X M p. Qi P G ft O P- < 3 ro o) H' 3 N O 3 (0 3* a P M M O aa o c o <ro M proa — a a ro •I* M > o ro 3 X ft p poa o ro o 3* a P M M Oaa o o o <ro t{ pro Q. a ro H o ro 3 ft p oa ro 3* > P P M P a o o jco <ro H ro a oaozo a > a a n «N <a a o >an G a > M Oz zoaaaaaa 1 iMii I , * \ .r.i* k. /.* . • < j f* . ^ V. /‘‘J: ; . ■>•;.»»>. V • • T' < ^ •■•K -rf’ CITY ®f ORONO Post Office liox 66* Crystal Bay, Minnesota 553Z}» Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka September 27, 1985 Duane Barth Excelsior Design 2385 Shadywood Road Box 15 Navarre, MN 55392 Re: Items to be resolved prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy 1800 Shadywood Road Dear Mr. Barth, A reveiw of the file on 1800 Shadywood Road indicates a number of items that must be resolved before the City can issue a Certificate of Occupancy; Resolution 1718-A of the City Council approved 1800 as a building site subject to strict compliance with the hardcover ordinance. You represented that the drivewa ’ would be constructed of porous "grass pavers" in order to I'eet the 25% hardcover limit. My inspection on 9/25/85 revealed that a gravel driveway and backup apron has been installed, which in itself constitutes 1800 s.f. of hardcover. Added to the house, front stoop, and deck, the total hardcover on the property now is approximately 3700 s.f or 38%, in direct violation of the hardcover ordinance. At this point, you would appear to have two options; A) Remove the gravel and replace with a porous type non-hardcover pavement; or B) Immediately make application to amend the previous variance approval. There is no guarantee that an additional variance will be approved, but you have the right to apply. 2. Your fireplace contractor must obtain a permit for the third fireplace. 3. You must submit evidence tha a utility easement for the sewer manhole serving the two properties has been filed in the chain of title of the property on which the manhole is located. BUILDING A ZONING - 473-7357 ASSI-SSING ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE - 473-7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 Duane Barth September 27, 1985 Page 2 4. The 3 original copies of the Resolution for this property (#1718“A) have never been signed by the owner. We only have Mrs. Johnstone's signature on one xerox copy of the resolution for 1810 Shadywood Road. As of 9/25/85, the Hennepin County Tax Records indicate the property owner as K.P. Properties Inc./Donald Peterson, hence Mr. Peterson or an authorized agent of K.P. Properties must sign the resolutions. A Certificate o'^ 0*^cupancy can not be issued until these matters are resolved. Please contact me if you have questions. c:Donald Peterson K.P. Properties, Inc. 32 Interlachen Court Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Lyle Oman, Field Inspector Tom Jacobs, Building Inspector Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator 1800 Shadywood Road file #874 Zoning file m-T-u - r — ■■■■■: - - - . '^?K #1>;CITY.. OF PRONP City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1718-A GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SEC'J’ION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE 1874 WHEREAS, Mrs. Donald Johnstone and Duane Barth thereafter "the applicants") have an interest in the property located at 1800 Shadywood Road within the City of Orono (hereafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 21, Shadywood (hereafter "property"), and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to allow the construction of a residence on a lot with 15,100 square feet in area or 69% of the required 21,780 square feet, and approve a lot width of 60 feet or 60% of the required 100 foot lot width. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota; FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as part of zoning file no. 874. 2. The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family Lalceshore Residential Zoning District. The proposal can meet all hardcover requirements of the LR-IC zoning district. 4. The proposed house and improvements can be constructed without the need for additional variances. 5. Property tax records indicate the lot has been valued and assessed as a separate lot. 6. The applicant acquired the property prior to the effective date of the current zoning standards, and has continuously held it as a separate lot. 7. No other land is available - lots are developed on both sides of the property. - '; 4 vA of ORdNO L'Si'.vy:'i'i City of OR.ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1718-A ______ 8. The property has been assessed for City sewer. 9. The property has been assessed for City water and was assessed a separate water unit. % 10. The lot area of 15,100 square feet is consistent with many other properties in the neighborhood and is equivalent to or larger than 11 of 25 existing building sites in the neighborhood. 11. The lot width of 60 feet is equivalent to or larger than 10 of 25 existing lots in the neighborhood. m .mmm •• • 12. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the aplicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 13. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, .light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the r-^olicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable h: ship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a residence on a property with 15,100 square feet in area instead of the required 21,780 square feet, and approve a lot width of 60 feet instead of the required 100 foot lot width, subject to the following conditions: 1. Maximum hardi.over of Lot 21 is to be 2,280 square feet including roofs, decks, driveways, sidewalks, patios, terraceS; and the like. i City of ORONO i msmm ^RbNO^ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1718-A_______ applicants shall bear the expense of bringing sewer and wat0T stubs to the property if no stubs exist* a;oun?'’o“"$?3\^otr “ The $225.00 sewer plant charge is to be paid with other standard charges when a building permit is issued. 5. Applicants are hereby advised that in approving the development of this substandard property that all future improvements must meet the current standards of the code and that a future Council may not approve any improvement to the property that requires a variance. 6. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one^ year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (January 14, 1986). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 8. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf or himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. January, 1985°.'’''^'’ Council on this 14th day of ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk \ Mary C. Billier, Mayor ^ (1) Property Owner cane_1 r#T;Tf fSTsnmLTin [•T«Tf •Jtkmt WH f»i [•jinii ifUliili •1CWZJ9 •lit r^«w« r«mtiiiiir» roAi MiHi iti^nrirt iTiTil; •I#!# VI be economically unfeasable for me to meet the Johnstone's asking price for the two lots. It is my intent, if the sale is closed, to build a new, quality home on lot 21 and to re model the existing home on lot 22. Both of these homes will feature quality construction and will be designed with ex- eriors which will be a credit to the neighborhood. I have remodeled and constructed many homes in the Lake Minnetonka area which have been attractive improvements to the neighbor- hoous. This can be attested to by many of my previous customers and neighbors of these home owners. This project will also be an attractive addition to the neighborhood. % 1 The construction which we propose will meet all of the set back requirements of your new ordinance and will also meet the ground cover requirement in the 75 to 250 foot zone which was previously questioned at your last meeting. These two lots are the largest of the seven 60 foot lots in the immed iate area. A summary of our building proposal follows: Lot 21 Lot size Lot size 75' to 250' zone Proposed building size Proposed decorative porous paving block driveway 428 sf X 557o Total ground coverage 25% maximum allowed in ordinance = 2280 sf Lot 22 Lot size Lot size 75' to 250' zone House addition Existing house in 75' to 250' zone Proposed decorative porous paving block driveway 635 sf X 55% Total ground coverage 75' to 250* zone 257o maximum allowed in ordinance “ 2775 sf 15,000 sf 9,120 sf 839 sf 235 .4 sf 2,074 sf 17,000 sf 11.100 sf 940 sf 534 sf 349 sf 1,825 sf 2,775 sf 22.7% 16.4% As can be seen from the site plan submitted with this letter we can meet all setback requirements for any propesed con struction as well as maximum allowed ground coverage as re quired in your new subdivision ordinance. The only item in question is allowing the building to proceed on lots which are below the size required for new subdivisions. Since these lots are larger than any of the 60 foot lots north of them on which homes were built or remodeled and since the lots have been platted prior to the adoption of your newest zoning and subdivision ordinance we feel that it would be a definite» discriminatory hardship on the Johnstone's to deny the building permits on either lot. The Johnstone's purchased these two separate building lots at different times and have purposely maintained the separation of properties from a tax standpoint as well as assessments. They have paid non homestead real estate taxes for the past 40 years on lot 21 and have paid a full assessment for sewer and water mains on both lots. The plant service charge for lot 21 will be paid at the time of issuance of the building permit which is normal proceedure. Based on the previously stated facts we respectfully request your approval of this application for building permit on lot 21 and the subsequent permit for remodeling of lot 22. Thank you for your consideratirtDn. ^T^^n^"^ari^, ^^elsior Design and Developement Inc, Planning Commission Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator December 5, 1985 #999 Evan R. Meline, 3598 North Shore Drive - Variances t«.4* List of Exhibits Exhibit A ■ Exhibit B - Exhibit C ■ Exhibit D • Exhibit E • Exhibit F • Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Composite Survey With Staff Notes Hardcover Calculations Zoning District - LR-IC, 1/2 Acre Application ~ Requesting variances to construct a new home on a substandard lot. Variances Required: 1. Lot Area - Required = 21,780 s.f., Existing = 5,300 s.f. dry buildable Variance = 16,480 s.f. = 76% 2. Lot Width - Required *= 100', Existing = 49' Variance = 51' = 51% 3. Street Setback - Required = 30', Existing = 8' Proposed = 20', Variance =10' or 33% 4. Left Side setback - Required = 10', Existing = 10' Proposed = 5', Variance = 5' or 50% 5. Right Side Setback - Required =10', Existing = 6.5' Proposed = 7.6', Variance = 2.4' = 24% 6. Lakeshore Setback - Required =75', Existing (measured from assumed 929.4 elevation) = 64', Proposed = 57' (house), 51' (deck), Variance = house 18 ' or 24%, deck 24' or 32% (also requires variance to allow structure in 0-75' setback area). 7. Hardcover (calculations based on assumed 929.4 elevation) 0-75': Lot Area = 3,800 s.f. Existing = 190 s.f. = 5% Proposed = 700 s.f. = 18.5% Allowed = C s.f. = 0% 75-250': Lot Area = 1,500 s.f. Existing = 535 s.f. = 36% Proposed = 380 + 360 = 740 s.f. = 49% (house)(deck) Allowed = 375 s.f. = 25% '•a-? V • Zoning File #999 December 5, 1985 Page 2 Notes: - There is no house to the west of this one, so the average lakeshore setback is based only on Feger's house to the east. However, the proposed house is closer to the lake than the Fegers, hence some views may be encroached upon. - In cut-and-pasting a composite of the three surveys for Meline (LaBresh), Fegers, and Pemberton, all done within the last year or so, note there is little consistsr cy as to the location of the shoreline. On none of the surveys was the 929.4* elevation shown, which is technically the contour that lakeshore setbacks are measured from. Based on the 3 surveys, staff in con junction with applicant's surveyor has created an "assumed 929.4* elevation contour" for setback purposes for this application. - Applicant notes that Hennepin County may consider selling the properties directly west cf this property. If this was to occur, the City would likely allow only the adjacent property owner (Meline/LaBresh) to purchase them, giving a little more dry buildable land in the 75-250* zone. The County as of 12/5/85 has made no final decision on sale of these properties. - Applicant has not proposed a garage for t.iis lot - this should be an item for discussion. The applicant, Evan Meline, is purchasing this property from the LaBiesh's subject to being allowed to build a new house. There has been an existing structure on the property for many years, but it deteriorated to the point that the City declared it hazardous, and this fall the cabin portion was demolished, leaving only a capped basement foundation which is caving in. As noted above, a number of variances are requested by the applicant. The dry buildable lot area as it exists is 5,300 s.f. or 0.12 acre. In the LR-IC zoning district, with a total of 631 developed propertied, 619 are greater in area than the property in question, based on the lot area/common ownership study done in 1983-84. A review of the plat maps indicates only a handful of vacant lots in the LR-IC district similar in size to this one and in single separate ownership. From a planning standpoint, it would be preferable that this become a vacant lot based on its substandard size and proximity to the lake. However, we must also consider the substantial property rights of the owner, especially in light of the fact that a house has previously existed on the property. 1 Zoning File #999 December 5, 1985 Page 3 If you choose to conceptually grant variances for this property, you should carefully consider the following points: 1. No garage is proposed. Is this realistic? Should we be asking the applicant to put a garage into his plans at this time rather than dealing with it later? 2. No turnaround or backup apron has been provided, hence the potential exists for cars to back out directly onto County Road 51. Is this acceptable, or should a backup apron be provided? 3. The magnitude of the variances requested is somewhat greater than those granted to Fegers next door, but in line with the standards the Planning Commission conceptually asked the Pembertons to meet. Because of the discrepancy in the indicated location of the shoreline from survey to survey, it may be somewhat arbituary to compare hardcover percentages between Fegers, Pemberton and Meline/LaBresh; however, these do give an idea of the relative magnitude of the variances granted or requested. (Granted) Fegers (Conceptual) (Proposed) (Required Pemberton Meline/LaBresh Standard Dry Buildable Lot Area 6,250 s.f.7,000* s.f.5,300 s.f.21.780 s Lot Width 49.96'49.9'48.71*100* 0-75' Hardcover 5.0%20%**18.5%0% (north) 75-250' Hardcover 56.8%52%**49%25% Lakeshore Setback*** 63*51*51'75* Street Setback**** 20'+20*+/-20* 30* Left Side Setback 6*10',5'5*10* Right Side Setback 6.5'15*7.6*10* **** From R.O.W. line (33* from centerline approximately) *★* Depends on actual location of 929.4' contour ■** Planning Commission recommended maximum * This figure* only Includes area north of the presumed County Road right-of-^uay. Pembertons actually own all the way to the lakeshore across County Rouu 51 for a total dry area of 11,130 s.f. Zoning File #999 December 5, 1985 Page 4 4. Remember that the property is served by and has been assessed for municipal sewer. Are there substantial and adequate hardships shown to justify granting of the requested variances? If not, is there a lesser magnitude of variances you would consider acceptable? Finally, if variances were denied can the property be put to some other reasonable allowed use? CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION //- ^ Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional project) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY !.0CATI0N Site Address 0 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ^ ^ ^0^1^ Please check one — Is the property _ _ abstract or torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name f^/Ai\) R. fH=>/._________ Phone Mailing Address 3SQR Lu Pi HLUl1h ■ OWNER Name ^^la^uyLp j . Phone ^70~V^a Mailing Address (jJcU^'zrtp SluJ^. Date Property Acquired\Avf;>. _ _ _ _ _(month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT DSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail; .Q aof,, VARIANCES REQUIRED _ Lot Area M Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances ( X Front Side ^ Rear) Other . i ■ ■ f,’ HARDSHIP T' Describ0 undu6 hardship or practical difficulty resv.lting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; Hr*.it.. ^^ l ? rf^ —_ _UJ^.QuQ^ o.<A'-,4. •g, y/tJr ' j DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Reauirements: Cj-iu^n^Y "f:. iA^jaxsr fxr REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. 2. Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 3.Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant an Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to thf> of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature3i>-'^/t,-uv> OWNERS SIGNATURE Mh 4^Date The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner t'KJ " Date// -'I'X Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. < ^ ^ > I • ll I )1 2 m a:a H O TJ > E 30X 2 o TO m TJ> ;o •< > m 2 o XI ^ o 2 :o m o o -n “Ti ao M m si;; m XI 2^0 M O C 50m Z 04 Z m H H m Z O r- m sr;* **§ 5?§ X3ui a vn 04 04 O O fS> O’ 04 09 an o H O 0> I x4 I l>> 04 C3 > G ioX o vn a H O H 2 Hnz o o 04 oo 01 09 0 09 1 vj I ro 01 x! o r> VI 2 ?. >aa 39 2 M m *H O VIo >J c > s a > -<rzooo VIm 04x^ 04 a X3 M <m •o m r- X3 H o m -< X3 n •3m <n S § m m 50 r- Ho m O 04 04 09 VI 09 o o 0 1 2 ►- vj3 H rv> 04 04(Az o 50 O m o rs> a o 73 -< N > H > 01 2 VI > ^ 50 O M f* O 04 0* VI sO 2 O ISI i o X3 VI VI ni VI m Z 0 m z 04 m V) o XI M < ni •nm ^ 3 m o X3 X3 VI H 0 09 1 VJ I rvj 04 VIzs 04x> o X3 o 3 f 9 M 2 X* r- > VI m TJ vj to r- VI I- m M Z m •o > r- -< Q > N r* o 04 04 09 O VI O r- 09 o > 09 I M>J.8 = :: Z H VI VI 04 vni CJ 01 50 f- m Z 04 m o CO 50 I = ^ m -4 to 04 > X X* r“ o X] o m o f\> o 01 XJ O 04 50 O Q ►- z o o VI VI -< _ ? oS: 50 VI VI VI X 04 O ^ X3 m m < to > H Z m XI Xo 0® < mr > fi® O 04 04 09 O' O O 09 I §vl I rj 04 o 50 i3 > < > < z > V) 04 Z X*o 50 O m o zo z < o m < m a 50 n > -< N > H > 04o»ovn > 5 m m ^ mma n n 50 m m H Z tt® > o 01 04 09 O' o VI o 09 VI VI 04 sO •A > Lmz » o o o z XI m m m r- to o %j XI I H fV X 04 a 50 ft® t. 2 ^ Z M m m VI m to 04 X X' O 50 O m o o •- o 5Jo 04 VI o o 70 O O O 04 O O 04 09 Z Z VI > > ^ r- r* o o a b C9 VI VI 04o o Xm C. L. H- rn Z ►i* r- X O ^ >0x1 2 2 -4 T9 O m z 04 H r- to 04 > z ^ a X 2 o 0x0 Z m o H ►- o >o X H 0 X H 0 X Z > 5a X C9> Z X > X 0 > X z 0 HX rn T3 2 X m X 0> X •< > m > X \ -< > Z m Z 0 > m z 0 0X > a a X > 0 0 2 X X m 0 2 X m 04 Xs o > -4m N fV9 N C9 VI Xm X 8 X> z cn dm • X •H X' X' 04 VIx»o Certificate of Survey for Evan R. Hellno In Lot 9, Block ?, Baldur Park Hennepin County, Minnesota je'stthack ///tc. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of that part of Lot 9. Block 2. Baldur Park lying northwesterly of the north westerly right of way line of County Road No. 51. and of the location of all existing buildings, if any, thereon, and the proposed location of a proposed building. It does not purport to show any other Improvenients or en croachments, other than an encroaching wood retaining wall. COFFIN i 6R0N3ERG, INC. Mark S. Gronberg Lie, No. 12755 Gordon R. Coffin Lie. No. 6064 Engineers, Land Surveyors, Planners Long Lake, Minnesota Scale Date 0 1 inch a 20 feet November 11, 1985 Iron marker / A.*--' r** VJ> •WP' aV'*' gv*'' . . 0^ ^>>/ /f4 \" ^0 V p ImI /- ^ yr tACjLT'>9'<^/> J* J/*■ ■’ ■' ■ (^i-a sXi’r. ’"-‘''»4!V‘’»?4'’<’^-’/.'■f r* „fv • ^ .*:. ' 'V *&oOq, r'- jS bss _ ^di^ftWay ^a. _ mmiM > r I m'* A.*^- ' •' *__ •5ir|:;;^^s -v, '-i-' V iI5;'<y %o ! V-c- LAKESHORE REGULATIONS AND HARDCOVER "LR-IB"SEC. 10.22. REGULATIONS FOR "LR-IA", "LR-lA-1", ■LR-IC" AND "LR-lC-l" ONE FAMILY LAKESHORE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT'. Within any "LR-lA", "LR-lA-1", "LR-IB’’, "LR-lC”, or "LR-lC-l" One Family Lakeshore Residential District the following regulations shall apply: Subd. 1. Lakeshore Set Back Regulations. The set back from the shoreline for lakeshore lots shall be at least 75 feet and no building may be located closer to the shoreline than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent and nearby lots. Subd. 2. Lakeshore Hard Cover Regulations. Within 75 feet of shoreline there shall be no excavating, filling, hard cover, temporary or permanent structures. Within 75 to 250 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hard cover. Within 250 to 500 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 30% hard cover. Within 500 to 1,000 feet .of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 35% hard cover. Subd. 3. Tree Removal Regulations. No trees within 75 feet of the shoreline with the diameter of six (6) inches or more shall be removed without first obtaining a permit from the Council. HARDCOVER LIMITATIONS 0-75' Zone - 0% Hardcover allowed 75-250' Zone - 25% Hardcover allowed 250-500' Zone - 30% Hardcover allowed 500-1000' Zone - 35% Hardcover allowed Percentage of hardcover for each zone is calculated as follows: Area of hardcover in zone (sq. ft.) X 100 =Percentace of Area of lot in zone (sq. ft.) hardcover in zone NOTE: Measure setback distances perpendicular to the shoreline, not along the lot line. t CO ^ w on O O rtrt>nJD‘»OWaWC w (0 M O H Oa o *0 a'o H- o» o n o H> n> (0 O (A H* a fl) < n> D* (0 P> X Hw (A O H- H* H* rt H* (A < (A D* (A ft (• rf H* ft H* i H- 3 H* 3 » 3 3 O H* Mn>o ft H*o 3 (A n o < rt c H- 3 (A (A n> iQ 3 (A 'O n> o H» 0» ft 3* 3*nD Oi (D a> a'13 o o (A CAp. 01 CTta H- (D I-* (A o a (D avx) HitQ rt^ ^ CC M ® 3*(oo»a:«aa: x(dit< Oi (U ^ 3 h .Q *i (Aa a n aT3 o n » o (0o o < o o o < (D a o» ao a o < (D O ft o n> 3 rt O O < (Dn < 0) h (D o (D 3 0) h O (D H 3 > O < H* (0 I-* (0 l-h 0» n p- O (Dp* ►d n p- a 3 3 N < (D h rt rt ft P* ft 3p (D O P a 3* (D (D (A 0)ft Cu n> p TJ n 9 M o O (0 < O 3 3 3 0 (D rt a (I>0, w 3 (D O (0 vQ I iQ I (D P* 3(u O Q < C 3 3 3* 0> p< ft C (u p a 01 3 X p* (A ft 3 P-iQ C 3 Ci.'O 0»& (» P ^ p p. 03 3 p* (D P (D a Oi o (D n>3 P < 3 o 3 O (A P vQ P Pi 0 0 O 3 P*0 0 ft <(D 3 P* P*3 3 C 0n>. Oi 3 3 Oi • 3 3 P O PIDO 01 (D (D 3 0|O a • <q (D 0 0 3 C M 3 P 3 3 P* 3 0 p (D 0 fl> 3 c p:<Hi 0 O T3 P (D 3 (D 3 ® Pi (D O 0» 3 3 P 30 (A (A P* N 3 (D • (D (A (D P* O W (0 T3 • X Oi a^< 3 P* 3 P' H ^*• P' 3 3 C C c « K 3 O C (A 3 P* 3 • H p »q p 3 3 3 P* CD 3 3 Oi (D 33 CO O Oi (D P* P 3iQ C Oi (0 3 P P 3 M *o ^P*P ft O Oi P-►0 3 3 0 P- 3 yQ P (A ft (0 P< 3 3 (D 3 3 O 3 Oc p p (D 3 0> ft ft N 3 ft|>or D> 0) ft O 3 J<a 3 O Pm rt 3 O p- 3 O P (D fU (A (D O c 3 pi ^ n> rt W p. I (D IT0 •vj X M u> O •< P* Ul fl> -*j fl) O'a^^ P 3 0 O > O H) *0 (A O 0> • ^ (A 3*0n> a o a a o (D 3 H-O 0» c H» X* a p*p* (A a ft o •• p* p* a rt»0 < 01 H.Mg OK {II cr o H-K • o o o O 01 H-a (D C PI M X (n o 3 CD /T*. i ‘ S. l" I c Si N (A 0 (A (0 (0 9 )■*> 0 OP (A p. 3 p.3 3 3 3 C 1 3 1 a 3 O (D 3 3 1 0 0 P (0 0 3 P-p a 0 p c 3 3 a C p" 3 CS a Oi Oi 3 *Tl P-a < 3 a (0aOi - 3 <(0 P* O (0 (A <a P- 3 P'CA a P (A Oi p"3 ^ (0 a (0 3 p 3 P- 0 (0 3 P 3 3 p-P*3 (2 *0 3 3 9 3 (0 Oi 0 «q (0 3 (0 3P(0 3 3 (A P 3 (0 3 3 O Oi Oi 3 O (0 (0 1 (A O "V •s * C -5>> f fr% rt PI M 0 CO J3 C PIn CD s w •M r- O O ft Pi vQ CD 1 ^ :> I ?.■ 0 Tl sr« O P*fs. a p ►< o*c p* p*a Oicr p* (D r» £ I. ‘1 > M pi 3a sL U1 N>-4oUlUl tsioo1oo 1 1 lO 1 z M Ul ‘Ul woooUlooo ON CO Hi 0 0 10 b \>r § (T N* -'v 0^ rN . O oS -J V o (A M» o 0 (A \}\ .It (A r\ 5? Ul O •. • ^ ■ 0 N® 0^ NJ Ln i'5 0^ cnw ►3 (3 > O It* > 5X W Viso »w p- 3 CO (A CO CO Hi Pi Hi Hi c Ul VO i A ^ 0 K It 11 CO CO CA CO Hi Hi P|Hi N O 3 (D M W 0 X ft p- (A 0> rt P P- (D 3 01 vq P- 3 No 3 (D 3 W 0> X P P' a (A O ft O P* < 3 (D H P 0 (D .|. p > o — (D 3 ft 0) p**q o (0 o X 3 W 0) X P P- a (A O ft O P* < 3 (D «q p p- 3 N O 3 (D 3 ►d 01 p P o aT> o oo < (i> p (A (Da —.*0 O (D •I* p > nw n> 3 X ft 0i p>«q O (D o 3 »d 0» P P o a*o o oo < 0> p (A (T>a (D po 0) 3 ft 0> «q (D 3 > 0i P* P P*a o o co <n> p (Da o 5d Oao s > ooo n ?n G > H Pf O S 5d «cnswn t3 L To: From Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date:December 11, x985 Subject: #1000 William Wear, 2160 Wayzata Blvd. - Variance Zoning District - B-1 Application - Variance for additional signage for shopping center use. Pertinent Ordinances 1. Section 10.61, Subdivision 3 (A) - no sign shall exceed 50 «,f. and signage area in B-1 zone shall be limited to 1 s.f. per 1 t of frontage. 2. Section 10.61, Subdivision 3 (B) - signage area limited to 4 s.f. per 1 lineal foot of building frontage and 1 s.f. for each foot of front yard not occupied by building. 3. Section 10.61, Subdivision 3 (D) - height limitation for signs within B-1 zone. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Council Minutes of 9/13/82 Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Sketch of Sign Review of Signage implications for 2160 Wavzata Boulevard In August of 1982, the owner of the property. Bill Wear, applied for a variance to permit the installation of a 20 foot high pylon sign, 6'x7' or 42 s.f. in area. The sign was to be installed for Q Petroleum and within 1 year the variance approval expired because the sign was not installed. In 1980, Wear received approval of another variance application for the erection of a 30' high sign requiring setback and height variances. In that review, the City determined that B-1 standards were not feasible for the existing shopping center use. B-3 signage allowance standards were used in that review as a more appropriate comparison. Approved Signage Plan of 1980: A) Highway sign 5'xlO' ID plaques 2'x9'x4 Building signage (letters 2' high, each user allowed 12* length) 10x24' s.f. B) C) *= 50 s.f. « 72 s.f. = 240 s.f. Total Existing Allowed with B-3 Allowed with B-1 = 362 s.f. ~ 380 s.f. ®= 200 s.f. L Zoning File #iH00 December 11, 19b5 Page 2 Current Application Wear now seeks approval for an independent - directory type sign to advertise new mexican restaurant and another new use. He has used a temporary mobile sign but finds this has not been effective in announcing new restaurant use. The existing plyon - directory sign is at maximum use level. The new sign is to serve as an additional directory source. Application is as follows: Sign Location Allowed *= 10' Proposed =27' to east of large tree - next to large bolder Height of Sign Allowed = 22' Proposed = 21' Area of Sign Proposed Total Existing Signage Total Proposed Signage Allowed B-1 Allowed B-3 38 s.f. 362 s.f. 400 s.f. 200 s.f. 380 s.f. Applicant should be advised of need to limit signage for site to these 2 directory signs. City will not approve a separate pylon sign for gas station use. Gas station would be asked to use new sign for ad vertising. This review should also place limit on future sign area allowance for the new directory sign. There is additional room for approximately 3 (5'x2'6") signs for a total of 39 s.f. or 40 s.f. Appli cant's total allowance for all exterior signage would be as follows; A)Highway sign 5'xlO'= 50 s.f. B)ID plaque 2'x4'x4 = 72 s.f. C)Building signage (letters 2' by 12' each use allowed 1 = 10x24 s.f.) high = 240 s.f. D)Directory sign - limited to = 78 s.f. 440 s.f. Allowed B-3 380 s.f. Allowed B-1 200 s.f. r Zoning File #1000 December 11, 1985 Page 3 Staff Recommendation To approve 78 s.f. of additional signage for the Orono Shopping Center based on the following findings: !• The location, height and size of sign will not impair the safety and welfare of the public. 2. The current zoning standards are not compatible with demands of shopping center use. Approval is based on the following conditions: 1. All exterior signage is to be restricted to areas approved by City - building signage *and 2 directory signs. 2. All other independent signs in front island or landscape zone are to be removed. Temporary sign permits are required for the use of portable signs on property. Such signs must be stored inside when not in legal use. 3. Applicant to provide updated landscape plan for 86 spring season. ir Y CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Pee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional project) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION. Site Address o _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) OOOS. Please check one Is the property abstract or torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Nanie L4/i///A~AA Phone -y y Mailing Address OWNER Name Phone ^7" 3 17^^^ Mailing Address P/) z3 6 y ^ z> ^ Date Property Acquired ^(month/year) I (do) (do not) also cwn the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District 'J^A Present Use of Property Re«4-den t ia 1"" Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ ^ ^ Describe request in detail: VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear) (OVER) HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; ^o~r a£i^ K DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 3* Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10 ) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included..1 APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature E.Date 3- a - -5” Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. The Lfmhn <^rp. ‘fOS "S uD.ibiAi Leber'fe Ccn^jVr. S&cfo tO e.b^'te<~ (bp\'5>, OllO Ind. Lons Lalfe. ,• mAD S&'5'2>L> adoracTor incLS0C9 Lq^£. dord hll(^hvOci\j u). Lone /-a te W/t> #1000 44«h Mb ^4 / HC 1233 PROPERTY OWNERS UST - OKoNO DEPT OF PROPERTY TAXATION A-603 government CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN S5487 list SIZf I CENTIPV THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ON THIS CERTIFICATE ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRE- SEN'^ATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION, TO THE REST OF MY RNOWLCD6E AND RELIEF HENNEPIN CO. DEPT. OF/rOPRRTY DATE FEE OWNER TAX PAYER/ MAILING ADDRESS pRO^RTY_^^iJ^S w i>o 14p.3SZ rj)A/PT- ^t4C.4 V ^ iAPLs(6 f '^)/iu/t/Ki /yj.iy-2-//ia * ■• z Z-YaJ/M A 11zz<^ Si-vj-/ " ' -A-I ’ M ■ ■■ A ■ 1#------------------------------------------- - - ^Hre •*2 Pa^ sNar^.assi'S^A£2L..37 /d. Mz/iTA 11jA yi '/)/uy/f/n i0>1 2/2y) YiYffY^Tyf Bis[d / CC.Hf^yJAY /Z y^3A w y tir ii!' '' . * ♦ * -....... t,.,CITY OF ORONO I 44" "t 1 [ j ry7r X c5UBTtcrr Pi^CPE-RTV LjOtJS- UU PAitcei-S . lieGULAK KJt ilU^ XJLi ^ Ai^A iUJUix i3# ^^ w •«I /\ui:-~ j- / / / / / / / §696 HILOUR HOLLANDER 250 Hollander Road Prelioinary Subdivision #698 HARVIN SEIBOLD 1699 North Farm Road Variance y.1699 WILLIAM WEAR 2160 Wayzata Blvd. Variance Mr. Thomas Sarenpa was present. Butler moved, Adams seconded to approve the side setback of 3.5* and hardcover variance. Notion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0) . Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed for the Council the Preliminary Subdivision application of Mrs. Hildur Hollander. Mrs. Hollander was present. Van Nest moved, Hurr seconded, to approve the preliminary subdivision per Planning Commis sion's recommendations subject to staffs inspecting the possibility of a private driveway easement through lot 3 and 4 to serve lot 5, council is concerned with direct access to County Road 6 off lot 5. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Nr. Marvin Seibold and his attorney Mr. Bob Mitchell was present for this application. Councilmember Tim Adams wanted it stated in the record that he was a partner in the farm that Mr. Seibold purchased and he did not feel he had a conflict of interest, if anyone on the council felt he did, he would step down. Council saw no problem and decided it would be acceptable for councilmember Adams to stay seated at the council table. Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to approve a 30* lakeshore width variance for lot 6 blk 1 subject to the filing of an amended Flowage and Conservation easement permitting construction of a joint or single residential dock per L.M.C.D. standards. Applicant is to work with staff in determining the best method of reaching shorel ine wi th 1 imited use of hardcover. Dockage limited to two slips. Notion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Councilmember Adams abstained. (1). Mr. Kevin Gonyea representing Q Petroleum was present. Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed the variance application with the council. i I b A % ^ ^ A A. * 9 A • •W A • V^ WWWA«W«A *1^ g W *>A ^ ^ 4k Ai^A Ai^ A^<A a %- i - •» Hurr moved, Butler seconded, to approve a 42 s£. sign area varaince approving a 20* high pylon sign located 27* off of Highway 12. The sign may not exceed 6* X 7* in area. This approval is subject to the following conditions. 1} Property 1 imited to 2 individual signs (directory signs 30* high and Q Petroleum sign 20* high) 2) Update on landscape plan summer of 1983. 3) City will require a temporary sign permit whenever the temporary mobile sign was in use on the site - must be stored inside when not in use. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). TAX EXEMPT APPLICATION 525 Leaf Street Van Nest moved, Frahm seconded, to respond to the state requesting a hearing and to delay approval till such time staff can research the file and determine the use of the building. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). WATER TOWER CHANGE ORDER «1 Adams moved, Hurr seconded, to approve the change order #1 for extension of time until the 17th of September. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). RESOLUTION §1414 Navarre Utility & Street Improvements Butler moved, Hurr seconded, to approve Resolution #1414 accepting the Navarre Utility 6 Street Improvements specs and plans subject to attorneys making changes on the contract reserving the City the right to award or not to award the contract. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0) . CITY ASSESSOR l; i-. Mayor VanNest reviewed the assessor contract with the County. The City is now in the second year of the assessment contract and if the City decides to get their own assessor we will have a time of duplication before Hennepin County has fulfiled its current contract. i: Van Nest moved, Butler seconded to have City Administrator Denson draft a resolution stating the City Council desires not to renew the contract with the County for anything past the term of the existing contract and that the Council is instructing our staff to proceed with a study and a recommendation to the Council as to how it is • V •J' I I i r. ‘ t'V f, It VW6 C<3^ 5 4 * ^:V-i ji iL. 1 y. #1000 hiu\J frwlEU 5? ^ :5- ^I6U VhMLLi '}* nX *5-V’______ m t’-, -w (i^m.■A DTCtL T)0L<^ ,.'i ii • \ c/) 1 I 1 1 ' ( - -J 0 OV. OVJ 0 6 i OPP ! l\ C. t L K.I U1? .J- To:Planning Commission Members From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date:December 11, 1985 Subject: #1001 Charles Garrity, 2701 Kelly Avenue - Variances Zoning District - LR-IB Application - Request to build new home on established residential lot. Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) - lot area a) Area Required = 43,560 s.f. Existing = 26,800 s.f. Variance = 16,760 s.f. or 38% Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) - side yard adjacent to street Required = 35' Setback of Developed Residence =15* (20* side setback variance approved 7/12/82) Proposed = 10' Variance =25* or 71% Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - hardcover variance 250-500' setback area required 8% variance (to review hardcover breakdown review Exhibit G) List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey For 1982 Review Exhibit E - Applicant's Hardcover Fact Sheet Exhibit F - Staff's Hardcover Fact Sheet Exhibit G - Council Minutes of 7/12/82 Exhibit H - Hardcover Breakdown Exhibit I - Surveys The current owner of the property proposes construction of a new residence on Lot 1, Block 2 Walters Port. The original residence (Scott Ellis house) has been demolished - house was constructed in 1902. The property is served with both municipal sewer and water. The lot size is consistent with surrounding Walters Port and Kelly Avenue properties. The City approved a side street setback variance of 20 feet and lot area variance in July of 1982 for Jerome Carlson. The original house had 2 curb cuts. Review Exhibit D. The 1982 application proposed a single access onto Walters Port. The current appxication proposes an access off Kelly Avenue. The City will ask that 1 curb cut be approved for new project. Public Works Coordinator has approved the Kelly Avenue access lr>cation. i Zoning File #1001 December 11, 1985 Page 2 The applicant seeks a hardcover variance within the 250-500' zone of 8%. Note the old survey of 1982 and current survey do not designate old drive from Kelly Avenue access. Staff would suggest that a drive and parking area would have brought existing hardcover within 250-500' zone over the allowed 30%. The applicant proposes 18% of hardcover improvements within the 75-250' zone. The excess of hardcover in the 250-500' zone is balanced out with additional allowance within the 75-250' zone. Applicant should be advised of the need to limit improvements to property that create hardcover in the future. In addition, it should be noted that excess in hardcover is located in zone furthest away from lakeshore. The side setback variance will allow the new owner to save the same mature trees referred to in 1982 application. Staff Recommendatioh To approve a lot area variance of 38%, a side/.-treet setback variance of 25 feet or 71% and a hardcover variance of 8% within the 250- 500' zone based on the following findings: 1. The property has contained a residence since 1902. 2. Sewer and water is available and has been assessed and paid for the property. 3. Previous residence was located 15 feet from Walters Port Road. 4. To relocate house further west would require the 3oss of several mature trees. Approval is subject to the following conditions 1. Applicant must obtain a building permit for new dock. 2. Applicant is hereby advised that a future Council may not approve setback or hardcover variances for this property in consideration of the total hardcover and location of house on property. CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION ^ OO iJouca Ol^c q Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional project) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ^90/ kf2lhl A^- Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) X! 7 2^ "y ^3 00\/O Please check one — Is the property _ _ _ abstract or V" torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Cl^t\ l^ ^ /2 ^73- V2/^ .0yu'Jr 9 <-t ! '-•7Cft?:_ _ _ _ft_ Phone _ _ _ Mailing Address 79 3x /^iaJ /h,'nu cr>r-w OWNER Name Phone Mailing Address Date Property Acquired 8/?v (month/year) I (do) n^) also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: Estimated Construction Cost ^ ooo VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width _ _ _ Front V Side Hardcover Rear) (OVER) f "1 HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; c/^/) / _A/ U'tx/C/AV i / A "T / DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements I g/r.A.,-, /hh 7 REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271J 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. certificate of survey including hardcover calculatijns as required. ' Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature ^/ ./)Date ///? < OWNERS SIGNATURE ./7 The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature / / / ' Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. 'I ^ • I _ H o ap§i N •< >> m z o a ;o > a 2 ^ * » m H 2 > > X 2 TJ m > \ -< > m O 70a ^32om Tj X) > z a > o 3 ” 3 -C" m m U) O M M 70 70 a §MOQ m m IM i>i I m 70 X H n m fN> ii i c,R55 U1 Z > > 4N H r- r* o mw » *o -o Iro o Mo:a o a o oi O O ra 0>Z Z Vj > > Of- r- vn fv> O O H- I fv>m z zm mr- r- 1/7 07 O O Z Z z > r* I H ro m vrf 70 </$ ro oo X* 0» I f- Hs m rv> X vj n N- m o 07 z M >s 3 3M Mn o X X > > m m r- r- iM 0E> Hm 07 O Cl ►- oom tjo 07 ;o ui H 04 OI Z •o u I— f 3 3 I ro 04 ro OI o o 4> O' 04 00 ro!-• I Nj Iro 04 INI OI oo X' N| 7 §5 3 U m > \ -c> m CJ ;oa ?o 3M o >;o ITf to 3 ro m 3s S3m > X_ < o OJ M > m m :o> Z ;a n M H -< OI 04 X zOIm n o 04 H O O iOI> z o 1—r- H x>04 01OI O 13 H o 7Z 73 Z > ^z o >Xm u 3 13 m73f»l > Z >\-<z o >m Z> a O z > 3 z a 3m73m 3 O 04 m ro 3 3 M ro c»X xJ > >O XI O O z z X o m o < <r-m m m *—07 X r- r-f- 1 M m H-*o r-Z 3t* X *-•z r-Mm xj •<n z■o r- 1 3 m Mr- r* ro Z >ngKM<m m 3 > fM O o X' o m Xnmr* 07M roc^ X m r- 73 :d O 04 M M ro 0) n n o X X > > ro 73 73 ^ O O I r- H H i > <m 07 01 04 04 o o 70 70 M M 07 to H H X ►- m >j r- I f— ro -< 04 ro H >r* > ro < 04 m oo X' m ro X XI n o rT7 04 07 z M >o r- ao H mis Z Z o 04 M M ro 0>r- r* xj r" r" o M M 04 ro > ► »- 3 3 I X X Ho 01 73 01 H 04 04 r- *-• > 2 rri 73 73 m m m m to 07 rri m c. c. 73 73 ZM 11m Z *- > r- I H ro m 04 70 to ro 04 T3 O O 73 O H 4> ro o 13 Clz oro xj o o a I X H- m xj r* I r- ro -< 04 01 OI 04 04 5m fVO 04 O o 04 04 r- I— o 04 m m ro c>m m >4 O ro 73 xJ g o != SO S C. 3 mI. n § 04 O 3 *— 73 O OI ro o» xj o ro ro I H m 73 01 07 OIMg 5:; H fN> m 04 73 07 ro 04 is H 04 1 -4 3 H m > N -< > rti o 73o 71 O 13 K 73:2 om u 73 Z O > O 3 Z m m ro X x4 n X' m 01 07 X M m 2 ^ 73 r- > <m 73 73 O 04 O ro o» i-J!r- c. 07 ro O •- _ 07 I OH ►- m X Z rti xj > r- I t- X f- ro m H -< 04 01 01 04 04 > ro < 04m 07 ? 70 H ro 07 11 H O 04 73 ro o» m -< C9 > Hn X 73i o o 04 O > Hm \ro ro 01 70m 373 -I 13 m • 13•H 04 OI o *■ V.»• ■ ' -^ s^Hf^ipyyaniiir^, 1 1 ■ I I ■)^ H ■>> C95n X :qi oo a> Hm \fv>r> \0>U1 ^ Li O O 90 M -n ni m m M 3 XIm i Ism • TJ M o> m ui 4> o Mt*iiiiirtiTi m' Tr • j:k. r Mi:*.< •: I. t. :'Tidd ;■ >:1 i \ Vaj Ci\r^ cn 0)cn cn Hi Hi Hi ‘JJ o ON 5^ ^’'Jx: <T^0 cn Hi cn Hi cn Hi cn Hi HARDCOVER FACT SHEET Zoning File #1001 IXHIBIT Allowed Zone 0-75' Area 2,500 s.f. allowed 0% HARDCOVER Existing Proposed 75-250* 18,300 s.f. allowed 25% 250-500* 6,000 s.f. allowed 30% 4,575 s.f. 1,137 s.f.* or 6.2% 3,317 s.f.*** or 18% 1,800 s.f.2,278 s.f.**** or 38% 1,247 s.f** or 20.7% (Staff questions final calculation because survey fails to specify existing drive and parking area of Ellis property) House 1/2 Garage Portion Paved Area = 742.1 s.f. = 222.5 s.f. = 175.0 s.f. 1,136.6 s.f. ** Paved Area 1/2 Garage *= 1,024.0 s.f. 222.5 s.f. 1,24b.s.r. *** **** House = 2,317.3 s.f. Portion of Garage = 232.0 s.f. (1/2 of 10x24) = 120 (14 X 8) = 112 Garage = 767.7 s.f. 1/2 of Large Gravel Area (41.5 X 37) 3,317.0 s.f. TOTAL Garage = 1,128.0 s.f. Gravel Area = 1,142.7 s.f. 1/2 (41.5 X 37) = 767.7 s.f. 15 X 25 = 375.0 s.f. 2,270.7 s.f. 1 /* U ‘ H ' H1 i VARIANCB 2701 Kelly Avenue «688 Jerome Carlson VARIANCB 1374 Rest Point Road #689 Larry Langhans VARIANCB 2794 Casco Point Road #691 Todd Robideau Mayor Van Nest moved, Hurr seconded, to table the Gibbs' application and to hold a special Council meeting at the Gibbs property on Friday, July 6,1982 at 9:00 A.M., in case of rain, the meeting will be held Tuesday, July 20, 1982 at 9:00 A. N. to view the access. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) . Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed with the City Council the variance request of Jerome Carlson, 2701 Kelly Avenue. Mr. Carlson, Mrs. Bills, and Mr. Reese were present. Mayor Van Nest moved, Hurr seconded, to approve' the variance request of Jerome Carlson, 2701 Kelly Avenue, per the Planning Commission recommendations, subject to the curb-cut being on Walter's Port Lane only; a permit to be issued for moving the present house to Spring Park. Hardship is due to the topography of the area. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) . Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed with the City Council the request of Larry Langhans, 1374 Rest Point Road, for a variance. Mr. Langhans was present. Hurr moved, Prahm seconded, to approve the variance request of Larry Langhans, 1366 Rest Point Road, per the Planning Commission recommendations, subject to new building site in the rear have no riparian rights to Lake Minnetonka. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed with the City Council the request for a variance of Todd Robideau, 2794 Casco Point Road. % Mr. Robideau was not present. Planning Commission Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator December 9, 1985 Subject: #1002 Mrs. F.C. Lyman, 825 South Old Crystal Bay Road - Conditional Use Permit Zoning District - LR-IA - 2-Acre Rural Residential Application - Conditional Use Permit for proposed addition to guest/caretakers house. List of Exhibits Exhibit A • Exhibit B ' Exhibit C ■ Exhibit D • Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey The applicant is requesting to construct an addition to the existing caretaker house on this 20-plus acre property. No existing conditional use permit is on file for the structure. The caretaker house meets the 30' side setback requirement, and the proposed addition will create no encroachments. There is adequate area on the property to meet all septic system needs. The requirement for an additional 2-acres of dry buildable, in addition to the 2 acres for the main house, is adequately met. Please review the plat map section attached and note the location of the principal residence and the caretaker house and barn. The proposal appears to meet all requirements of Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (G) for a guest house conditional use permit. Staff would recommend approval subject to the standard requirement that the structure may not be rented out. $1^0.00 a) $150.00 b) $150.00 c) $250.00 d) $200.00 f) PRD/PID - s PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) rens? DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: Lfc- AJ^is>rif>u T7> r-r ided o REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350 * (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance /i-663 Government Center 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal si2ed envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address, 4. Certificate^of survey, 5. Construction plans, if applicable, * • • V . ^ * . • j - ’ i : . ' f I ' ^ ..., ^ • • 6. Plat Map. a The Applicant and Property Owner must s: gn this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been .included. i ^ APPLICANT'S SJ:r.HATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best his/her knowledge.4^^Applicant's signature OWNERS SIGNATURE Date r The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. CB . j Date / / // 3, / 5Owner's signature Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Conunissicn Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. ^ f •A - > A> ":r>s Js^ .vT.'j na'* r' /: » ^0 S;.->V# -.T \ ./ f i / J \ f/ a.A \ \ \ / / « V \\ A 1 \ r. ** I.* V *fs*2'rT»'\ # \ \^\\ ■■ ' \ \ \* 1^ \ « t r %A \\ -% ' \ — J/ 4^ s \ \ \ \ \\ \ '■• ' \ \ \ \ ^ ■? •<;* \ a « . r*o -H ►. ro !' «• !**H 1 i v»I »• ^ rv> c. c. o ui p- ro X ?? oo o ro 0)O ^ m ror\f zc p9 ^Z o 3 -n <j^ Z iv>Q m Z o (/) Nj o m »• Vji•no 4>r ^ H TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE: December 10# 1985 SUBJECT: Planning Commission to select meeting date for month of February The Planning Commission is asked to select a meeting night for February that will be compatible with schedules of all seven members. The regular meeting night is a legal holiday and the following Tuesday night is the monthly planning meeting at the High School Cafeteria. A copy of the offical City Calendar is enclosed for your review. (I) -t*. ‘-vl U)Vo Coro 3 O COO) CD ro fO-* -fc CJ)09-*^H ro-*-» -4 0) <o fo c;i *n fOrO-* QD *^OCO 0)0)0) -* ^ ro fo —4^ Ln to to 00-^.j^-M 5: roro~k (OtOCJ)CD-^H G)fO-A ^ ocoo)(Dfo*n^ (oro«*^ 00 -* A *^4 O CO CO 0) C)y> ro cn CO ©©T) s5 ro/TX^ »< CX)Wx^ *V4 —I roro-* V. corooioo^ COI\3-A OG)0)CD cofo _ -*^->IOC0T|^q ro 00 CJIQD-A^COO 0)CD^^ ro-*-* acofocn fiS 00-*^!;^ H ^IN)CHQ0-*< (oto-* OCOOCDfOH cjro-*-* ^ -*<^^0(0-n^o 10-4-4 05aia>^^coo) rofo-* c. CO fO Ol OD-* CO C ,o3*^ cnoo-^ A< ro-*-* 0)corocn -H foro-* ^ •>i O G) 0) Ti foro-* oo 0D-* ^ *^C00) ro-* eoocoro c^d-*|^ ro-*-**^ O) CO roc;) roro-* ^OCOO) roro-* 00 -4 ^ «s| fO-* foc;icx>- 4 Coro-* QC>)0)corolI®, fo-?^5r c;»a)^ ro-*-* ^ O)corocn AOCOO) Vro-* roro-* CO rococo roro-* c. '^OCOO co£L OrOCOOD^H G}fo-4 OGi)0)COro< CJfO-*-* ro-*-*^ ^ aiO)-*X^<oro-*-* 00 O)corococoo> Coro-* ocoocoio ofrofJpn ro-^ -* cnOD ro oCO roc;) roro-* •>40COO> roro-* 00-*^ -vj roro-* corocnCD *3 OCO^^H m 00 -* 4Sk -H ro — O) CO ro cn Ti ^ r\ > r\ ^ .rv » coro —— -* -NIOGJimro--* O)corol rofo- ~n| O COC7) roro — 00— -u ^ H ^)^o —CD ro cn cx) — Ti roro— > -^OCoO) C/)TJ cna» —Nroro corocna* CA>ro OCJOCOfO^ ro — — -Ni c Ca) H ro--cn CD — x** -n tp r /^-/4-SS' Kc.n.•»/xv mmEmmm >CT\- 8 -Si ^ Mmm z !iiW f,L®^f‘'z JZ-. m IV? r.<> m ■#99T '?05 X _-..J •Um'«*^««!«>•• ^ \ ^ m rK-m I iT«j ’g;%.‘^3g’a(.?r"3i^^a'N’*^ _ . — —-------------■fcTi «l*f-« AwMcav *r>%rM ••’^^-' \v, tM (*•T#M i.^ •«• T h-r»t> r,rti-v ’VI •Mn »’ - tr- •»-» "‘•«-»^' ”u' n ^ v,r^r1., T-./« ru: if.;;: -i? *0 v:;h.;t« .:Tfi;«ii c-u«t, ruS;; -Jt u, ou.r ooKxw: k. com* CO,, 1*:. Sr«i.*i I ’ '“'® tete I S-‘»-U • I • I ,h»:trt«l l^aAwrfc e I Ir^. wr*<»f ToSZ Hira S. Uror.barr ’ V.l?7^5 >nd I.Mnr«»"'ra anc FlMaumn ,4-a*, ^lnr*iM>l« r?C 7»7. /^/iftr »tfC SURVEY rOR EEN BELLOWS M 1/4 OF SECTION S-llY-ES mm V » • «M» I P.cn - -w-.im ■ ■ ^ ■ < ^'--r \ • 'm:-- i:A^