Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07-16-1990 Planning Packet
PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO UmML J PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORT-IATION REQUESTED BELOW FOP. OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS NA2iE OR NUI4BEK PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1. fAiLL -^hKl t • \ .} 3. Q('l ^ t ^ c Pv.v St/t-A A 4. 'f u- ^ »v.4.a-,7 sV<f (W,(' A-., /l ay ' 6^'; P-., /7_^ 6. VT^C^ p/ l^'i ~P.ivi u;..v. A’,tr‘>t---, ^------------- ^ T.*' V mv ^-frlA 8. /?(i .?70o /^ ‘j-^/6:s'5' _ 9 ^/h/) i 1 *JIjS V \ li ^ • ‘vv i t(<ux / 7 / / 10. TAtAi-^ji 'hLani V I'TLO CV7) /ft /'f/f/.’./■!'•' / 11 11 y ^ A ' ^ -<SA- ^ 12. A 'f \AJ 1/ *' f*' i' t'-.vOvb ' ‘ V ^ \ >7 _JL_l££.^ 13..^-<1\ i P;i'. .f: .^:<^K:<ui \Ll.j. :i't Tf/'/x') .' 14. k 'av ^; Cr^r7>r P b M > 0 ^ i5.{^./ yLd^j-^ ;» j P ^/5 i 7 y/5 L o 16 ^ ^L 'U‘f.‘UUy u.p£^V/< ^7 '/J^A u.'^f 'd' f (f :d /uj-n IT./Wi .X' W^v *V>. - ._ r ' . ^ 'J '• ' ‘v K \^:L' u' . , s |> C ' '- ' ■' 18 . XV ) 't- h V «* • . (P/'/'n lUu',i( 19. 20. J • • • CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, JULY 16, 1990 7:00 P.M. 1275 BROUN ROAD SOOTH - COUNCIL CHAMBQIS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - Barbara Peterson ATTENDANCE PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 p.m. #1555 Landstar Inc., 2501 Old Beach Road - Preliminary Subdivision 2. 8:00 p.m. #1564 JoAnn Grimes, 4720/4730 North Arm Drive - Subdivision Lot Line Rearrangement ACTION ITEMS Review of these items will commence between scheduled public hearings. 3. #1536 Steve Gardiner, 3770 Bayside Road - Vacation - Variances - Continuation of Public Hearing 4. #1551 5. #1553 6. #1554 7. #1556 8. #1557 9. #1559 #1560 10. #1561 11. #1563 12. #1565 Robert Waade, 998 Wildhurst Trail - Preliminary Subdivision - Continuation of Public Hearing Mike Pierce, 480 Deborah Drive - Variance - Public Hearing Timothy Gramentz, 4680 North Arm Drive - Variance - Public Hearing Gerald Nelson, 1629 Bohns Point Read - Variance - Public Hearing Mike Cullen, 2700 Pheasant Road - Variance - Public Hearing John & Roberta Henrich, 4125 Highwood Road - Variance/Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Christine Beck, 3820 Cherry Avenue - Variance - Public Hearing Maurene & Jerry Denzel, 1295 Elmwood Avenue - Variances - Public Hearing Leesa & Richard Andersen, 3205 Crystal Bay Road - After-the-fact Variances - Public Hearing « •* ‘ •. OROMO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, JULY 16, 1990 7:00 P.M. ACTION ITEMS CONTINUED 13, #1566 Dr. & Mrs. Thomas Regnier, 1205 Elmwood Avenue Variance - Public Hearing 14. #1567 Robert & LouAnn Powell, 2916 Casco Point Road Variance - Public Hearing 15. #1568 James & Judith Pierpcnt, 1801 West Farm Road Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing 16, #1569 Sam McCloud, 4280 Bayside Road - Variance - Public Hearing ADDITIONAL ITEMS 17. Planning Commission Approval of Minutes of June 18, 1990 Meeting 18, Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the August 13, 1990 Council Meeting. ADJOURNMENT To: From: Date: Mayor Grabek & 6rono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator July 12, 1990 Subject: #1555 E.W. Blanch, Jr., 2501 Old Beach Road - Preliminary Subdivision Class III - Public Hearing Zoning Districts - B-4 & LR-IB Total Area = 31.26 acres Pertinent Ordinances - Chapter 11 Section 10.55, Subdivision 15 (A) - Minimum lot area requirements. The property may receive credit for portions of land located within wetlands and floodplain as property is sewered, but in no case can a dry buildable envelope be less than 1/2 acre of dry contiguous land. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Application Property Owners List Plat Map Staf<^ Memo - Sketch Plan Review Planning Commission Action Notice Staff Sketch - Amended Sewer Plan Preliminary Plan Grading, Drainage ana Utility Plan The applicant has filed a preliminary plan for a 9 lot plat located within both the Cities of Minnetonka Beach and Orono - Lot 1, Block 2 and Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 within Minnetonka Beach and Lots 3 through 8 within the City of Orono. At the sketch plan review, che applicant was asked to define the purpose of Outlots B and C located within the City of Minnetonka Beach. The Zoning Administrator of Minnetonka Beach has advised that she had asked the applicant to eliminate the outlots as currently shown. Applicant should provide the City of Orono with some background on this matter. In general, the City staff has no major concerns with the preliminary plan submitted for our current review. The preliminary plan is reviewed in detailed below. Zoning File #1555 July 12, 1990 Page 2 of 5 LOT CONFIGURATION - All lots continue to meet the required lot width to the of the 35* front setback line. Lot 9 has been omitted, replaced by Lot 8. Lot 8 is defined along the existing B-4 zoning line. As a result, the applicant did not have to file a petition for rezoning with the preliminary plan. Lot 8 is to oe donated to the Freshwater Foundation for future use of the institute. As already noted at the sketch plan review, Outlet A will also be in the control of the foundation for future use by the Fresh Water Institute. During the sketch plan review, the applicant was advised that designation of the outlet as proposed needs a variance to the normal procedures of the City and that wetland areas were to be incorporated within the boundaries of the residential lots. Applicant had advised that the foundation wished to retain the wetlands area so that appropriate controls could be developed on the property as further restrictions on the institute's use of the wetlands. This appeared to be acceptable to members of the Commission. Applicant was further asked to provide documentation concerning the specific controls to be placed upon the out lot. As of this writing, the City has not received the special covenants although applicant has contacted the administrator of the foundation who may have the covenants by our meeting date. ACCESS - Lots 3 through 7 shall achieve access via Old Beach Foad. Lot 8 shall achieve access via the defined road systems within FWBI property. Access is not proposed directly onto Shadywood Road for Lot 8 at this time. It is staff's understanding that Lot 8 shall serve for future dormitories for visiting students. In discussions with the City Engineer and the Public Works Director, staff has been advised that Old Beach Road, at least the portions within the City of Orono, have been scheduled for upgrading within this year. The road at an approximate 24 width is scheduled for leveling and 2" bituminous o<,-*rlay. Applicant shall be asked to make payment for these improvements. It may be appropriate for the City of Minnetonka Beach to coordinate required improvements with the City of Orono. Staff will review this matter with the Zoning Administrator at a later date. The City will ask for 33' dedication of right-of-way for Old Beach Road as shown on the preliminary plan. Zoning File #1555 • July 12, 1990 Page 3 of 5 SEWER & WATER UTILITIES - Already noted in the sketch plan review, there will be a sewer unit charge of $897.62 for each sewer unit based on the 1990 fee schedule. This fee is adjusted each year based on an inflationary rate. There will be no water unit charges for the 6 lots within Orono. Minnetonka Beach shall be charged at the same sewer unit rate quoted for Orono. There will be a charge of $1,691.78 per water unit for lots within the Minnetonka Beach area. There is an existing water main within Old Beach Road. The applicant proposes a 500' extension to the north to serve the northern lots within Minnetonka Beach. The City of Minnetonka Beach shall be responsible for portions of the water lines within the boundaries of their City. This may also be an issue to discuss at a future date with the administrator of Minnetonka Beach. Please review Exhibit F, staff must ask that the proposed 8" sanitary sewer line be amended as shown on the staff sketch (Exhibit F). The City does not approve of public utility lines placed within the private boundaries of properties because of the difficulties of achieving access and creating an impact upon existing improvements within those lots. The City staff recommends that the sewer line be routed down Old Beach Road and then along County Road 19 up to the lift station. The City will ask for a 25' wide drainage and utility easement along the street lot lines of Lots 6 and 7 up to the lift station in Lot 8. Applicant's surveyor should designate existing utility easement over lift station within Lot 8. DRAINAGE/GRADING PLAN - At the time of the sketch plan review. City staff had asked that the revised grading plans show locations where fill had previously been placed as part of the dredging project within the Lafayette Bay area in 1978. The filling involved Lots 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 within the City of Orono. Note that the wetlands has been defined at the 931.5' elevation. The major concern for this review is that the City of Orono is asked to approve excavations within the defined wetland area to offset filling of the flood plain/wetlands/lakeshore protected area of Lot 1, Block 2 within the City of Minnetonka Beach. Applicant failed to advise the City of this land alteration at the time of the sketch plan review. If the City had been advised of the proposed land alterations, a separate conditional use permit and variance application would have been required to be filed within the preliminary subdivision application. Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 prohibits the filling of floodplains, wetlands and lakeshore protected areas within the City. If an applicant wishes to fill within these protected areas, a variance application is required and a statement of hardship must accompany that application. Zoning File #1555 July 12, 1990 Page 4 of 5 The applicant has been made aware of the need for a separate filing and has asked that the preliminary subdivision application be considered independently from the conditional use and variance application. The staff has discussed the proposed land alterations with the Zoning Administrator for Minnetonka Beach. She advises that the City of Minnetonka Beach currently has a moritorium on all proposed land alterations of flood plain and wetland areas within their city. The City of Minnetonka Bea :;h cannot affectively act on the request to fill within Lot 1, Block 2 at this point. Applicant proposes placement of approximately 1,800 cubic yards of fill to be placed below the 931.5' elevation but above the 929.4' OHW of "ake Minnetonka. The excavations within the City of Orono are to compensate for the storm water storage volume lost within the Minnetonka Beach portion of the flood plain. The purpose of the filling appears to not provide greater area for the building envelope, but merely as an expansion of the yard area. Isses for Planning Connission's Consideration Regarding Land Alteration Issue: 1. Should the City of Orono permit excavations within flood plain/wetlands for filling projects that would be in complete violation of the codes of our City? 2. Should all compensating excavations be completed within the City of Minnetonka Beach? 3. Based on the configuration of the floodplain within the Minnetonka Beach area, compensating excavations may be severely limited? - Should filling be limited to the ability of Minnetonka Beach to locate suitable area within the floodplain boundaries of Minnetonka Beach? Planning Commission should advise applicant as to their position regarding a conditional use permit and variance that would ask for excavations within the floodplain of Lake Minnetonka for filling within a lakeshore protected area no matter what city the property is located. The applicant has failed to show drainageways that enter the property along the east and southern boundaries. The drainage map should be updated to locate drainage paths and their impact upon the dry buildable envelopes if any. Zoning File #1555 July 12, 1990 Page 5 of 5 Options of Action - 1. Table application providing applicant additional time to file a conditional use permit and variance application with the City for the excavation of wetlands/floodplains within the City of Orono; or 2. Approval finding the 6 lot proposal meets all standards of the zoning code and subdivision regulations of the City. In addition, there is adequate sewer and water capacity within existing lines to serve the new development and that all lots achieve access via an approved public roadway. Approval is subject to the following conditions: a) Payment of a park dedication fee based on 8% ci' the fair market value to be determined by the City Assessor upon final approval of the preliminary plat by the Council of Orono. Payment to be made by applicant upon filing of the final plat. b) Granting of Flowage and Conservation Easement over the wetlands defined below the 931.5' elevation. Wetland to be defined as drainage easements on the final plat. c) Applicant to dedicate and designate all drainageways on the plat as drainage easements at a minimum width of 15*. d) Applicant to be responsible for expansion of municipal sewer service and upgrading of Old Beach Road consisting of leveling and 2” bituminous overlay e) The City of Orono shall agree to the creation of Outlot A for the exclusive ownership of either the Fresh Water Institute or Foundation. Such usage to be limited by special covenants to be approved by the City. Such covenants shall not be in conflict with the ordinance of the City that protect wetland floodplain areas as set forth in Section 10.55 of the municipal code. f) Final plat to show a 25' wide drainage and utility easement along the street lot lines of Lots 6 and 7 through Lot 8 up to the utility easement over the City's lift station. Final plat should designate existing utility easement over lift station. g) Applicant to provide amended sanitary sewer extension plans for final approval by the City. h) Applicant is advised that the current sewer unit charge for new construction for the year of 1990 is $897.62. This will be adjusted each year based on the inflationary rate. -f}'cm OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION J / ^ Slt:e Address Unassicneil ^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) See attached CiTr OF QRSHQ '' L'v>rM^-r ncTTrc Please check one - Property x abstract or x torrens? ^ j.*-*-a**u*.-vWvv.._ . ^ Attach legal description to application. -j..,. w i-^v ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________>dp.w / /i.rjrn I uu APPLICANT Phone (home) CaOi HOI TO?: 12 ---------------------------- 5/90 Neune Dennis E. Sandin Phone (work) (612') 591-1 329 Landstar , Inc , Address: ft inn nnid^n Vniipv. Rnad City: nnidon Vniipv Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Name E.W. Blanch. Jr._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (work) (612) 8'^5-3310 Address: 3500 West 80th Street City: Minneapolis Zip: 55431 (attach list if more than one) w mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm ^m mm ^m mm mm mm mm mm mi mi mi mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm «m mm mm mm mm ^m mm mm mm mm mm mm ^m mam mm mm mm mm mm mi «m m» mm mm mi am mam mm mm ■ • • 4M mm mm ^m mm mm mm mm ^m ^m «m mm mm EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels 6_ _ _ _ Development Size Acres Dry Land _ _ _ _ _ _ Acres Wet Land 31.26 Acres Total# all parcels Present Use (check) ___________ Residential; no, of units ___________ ■X ______ Other (specify) Vacant lat.d________ Present Zoning District_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PROPOSAL _ _ _ _ _ _ Division for Tax Purposes _ _ _ _ _ _ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) X_ _ _ Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: _ _ _ _Existing Units 10_ _ _ New Units 1 u_ _ _ Total Units Proposed Gross Density; _ _ _j_ _ _ Units per i.o+Acres Minimum Lot Size: __ _ _ _ _ _ Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check) _ _ _^_ _ _ Residential _ _ _ _ _ _ Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2. 3. MIIIIMOM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 4. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III)$150.00 Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement 250.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision)250.00 X Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) 300.00 + 20.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) •(Plus any legal or engineering charges) l->0.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Date Owner's Signature all submitt2i^>-4AC( Date Applicant must have all submittar^'-^aco the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of bhe Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. CQ RUN DATE 05/24/90 BATCH Oil PROP ADOR ONNER NAHC TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADOR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP ADOR OI>t€R NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR MENT^EPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OHNERS LIST SB 21-117-2S 2S 0030 02648 LYDIARD AVE E G FREESE A J P FREESE ELDON G A JOANN P FREESE 264B LYDIARD AVE EXCELSIOR HN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0038 02750 KELLY AVE JOHN L KOZAR ETAL JOHN L KOZAR 2750 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR HN 55331 82 16-117-23 33 0019 00082 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOHEOHNERS LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOHEOHNERS PO BOX 41 MTKA BEACH HN 55361 82 16-117-?i 33 !025 00082 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED E H JR A P K BLANCH E H BLANCH CO C/O ROBERT BROBERG 3500 H BOTH ST HPLS HN 55431 38 21-117-23 23 0036 02720 KELLY AVE CATHERINE E HANSON CATHERINE E MEAGHER 2720 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0054 02615 SHAOYHOOD RO THOMAS P A NAfCY A HUBER THOMAS P A NANCY A HUBER 2615 SHAOYHOOD RO EXCELSIOR HN 55331 82 16-117-23 33 0023 00082 ADDRESS UTMSSIGNED E H JR A P K BLANCH E H BLANCH CO C/O ROBERT BROBERG 3500 H BOTH ST MPLS MN 55431 82 16-117-23 33 0026 02315 OLD BEACH RO R H ADAMS A K B ADAMS RICHARD M A KATHLEEN B ADAMS 2515 OLD BEACH RO HAYZATA MN 55301 Q REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 32 38 21-117-23 23 0037 02740 KELLY AVE JOHN G MUIR ETAL HRS PHYLLIS E OMALLEY 2740 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 82 16-117-23 33 0018 00082 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO LAFAYETT*^ RIDGE H0ME06tlERS LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOMEOItCRS PO BOX 41 MTKA BEACH m 55361 82 16-117-23 33 0024 00082 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO E H JR A P K BLANCH E H BLArCH CO C/O ROBERG BROBERG 3500 80TH ST H MPLS MN 55431 TOTAL BATCH Oil 00047 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HErilEPIN C0UT4TY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION^ TO THE BEST or H{ KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. y DATE - / \ / I 1 ■D RUN DATE 05/2V90 BATCH Oil PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR CMIER NAi E TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OltlER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OltlER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY ONNERS LIST SB 20-117-23 11 0034 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA UNIV OF HINN-REAl EST OFF MORILL HALL RM 335 100 CHURCH ST MPLS MN 55455 38 21-117-23 22 0002 02420 OLD BEACH RD NAB ROHMANN HALTER A A BETTY T ROHMANN 2420 OLD BEACH ROAD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 21-117-23 22 D005 02490 OLD BEACH RD MINVESCO CORPORATION MINVESCO CORPORATION 9372 CREEKNOOD DR EDEN PRAIRIE MT4 55344 38 21-117-23 22 0010 02560 OLD BEACH RD J R KREY A J L DICKir4SON JAMES R KREY 2560 OLD BEACH RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 21-117-23 22 0013 02585 SHADYNOOD RD D M SCHULTZ LTAL DONALD M SCHULTZ 2565 SHADYNOOD RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0001 02765 KELLY AVE OA/ID M JELLISOf4 A HIFE DAVID M A SUSAN JELLIS044 2765 KEcLY AVE EXCELSIOR m 55331 38 20-117-23 11 0036 FRESHHATER FOUNDATION FRESHHATER FOUNDATION C/0 E H BLANCH CO 3500 H 80TH ST BLOOMI^4GTON MN 55431 38 21-117-23 22 0003 02440 OLD BEACH RD EARL A SHEEN EARL A SHEEN 2440 OLD BEACH RD HAYZATA m 55391 38 21-117-23 22 0006 02496 OLD BEACH RD D A SAKLAD ASM SAKLAD DANIEL A SAKLAD 2496 OLD BEACH RD OROfK) m 55391 38 21-117-23 22 0011 02570 LYDIARO AVE T A RYAN A P J RYAN THOMAS A RYAN 1070 TOfJK'HA RD LOT4G LAKE M4 55356 38 21-117-23 22 0014 00038 ADDRESS IA4ASSIGNE0 E N JR A P K BLAr4CH E H JR A PATRICIA BLA^4CH C/O E H DLAf4CH CO 3500 BOTH ST H BLOOMir4GTOr4 MT4 B5931 38 21-117-23 23 0005 02655 PHEASANT MO F T FORMER JR A 0 C FURRER J T FORMER ADC FORRER 2655 PHEASANT RO EXXELSIOR MT4 55331 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 31 20-117-23 11 0037 E N JR A P K BLANCH E N JR A PATRICIA BLANCH C/O E H BLAF4CH CO 3500 N BOTH ST BLOOMINGTON »tl 55431 38 21-117-23 22 0004 02480 OLD BEACH RO GEORGE N RONALD ETAL GEORGE H RONALD 2480 OLD BEACH RO HAYZATA MN 55391 38 21-117-23 22 0009 02540 OLD BEACH RO 0 M SCHNEIDER A M H LEAF D M SCHNEIDER A M H LEAF 2540 OLD BEACH RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 21-117-23 22 0012 02636 LYDIARO AVE S M SHENSON A G M LARSON STEPHEN ROSS RATLIFF 2636 LYDIARO AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 22 0015 E H JR A P K BLAr4CH E H JR A PATRICIA BLANCH C/O E H BLAF4CH CO 3500 N BOTH ST BLOOMINGTON Ft4 55431 I, J 38 21-117-23 23 0026 02755 KELLY AVE D GESELL A K KAVEfmAN-GESELL OREH A GESELL 2755 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 • r RUN DATE 05/24/90 BATCH Oil PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY ONNERS LIST 38 17-117-23 44 0D85 03340 SHORELINE DR STEVEN M MARTIN STEVEN M MARTIN 6690 GAME FARM RD MINNETRISTA HN 55364 38 17-117-23 44 0094 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOMEONNERS LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOMEONNERS 1709 N FARM ROAD LONG LAKE MN 55156 38 20-117-23 11 0004 02595 LYDIARO AVE P t k LENOX PHILIP A ELIZABETH LENOX RT 1 MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 20-117-23 II 0017 02455 SHAOYHOOD RD JARIBO INC JARIBO INCORPORATED 4545 ENCHANTED PT SHORENOOO MN 55364 38 20-117-23 11 0024 03333 SHORELINE DR MGT COMPANY SUPER VALU STORES INC CORPORATE TAX DEPT PO BOX 990 MPLS MN 55440 38 20-117-23 11 0029 02545 SHADYHOOO RD THOMAS C A DEANNA M LEACH THOMAS C LEACH 8460 133RD COURT APPLE VALLEY MT4 55124 38 17-117-23 44 0091 03265 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT CHEYENT4E LAND CO STUART A A HILDA J GOLDBERG 3265 LAFAYETTE RIDGE COURT NAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 11 0002 02420 SHADYHOOO RD bOYAGEUR SERVICE CENTERS VOYAGEUR SERVICE CENTERS CO RD 15 A 17 NAVARRE MN 55392 38 20-117-23 11 0007 02560 KELLY AVE KIRK K NELS0T4 KIRK K NELSON 2560 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 11 0018 02455 SHADYHOOO RD PAUL M EfA^LUNO ETAL PAUL M A JEANNE M ENGLUND PO BOX 448 MOUND MN 55364 38 20-117-23 11 0027 02477 SHADYHOOO RD R FREDERICK FREVERT ET AL MICHAEL HURLEY A MARY HURLEY 5100 GAMBLE DR UNIT 90 MPLS MT4 55416 38 20-117-23 11 0030 02525 SHADYHOOO RD THOMAS C A 0EArA4A M LEACH THOMAS C LEACH 8460 133RD CT APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 REPORT NO. PZ435401 PAGE 30 38 17-117-23 44 0092 03245 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT CHEYENNE LAND CO DAVID F A SUSAN J BRIGGS 3245 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT HAYZATA rt4 55391 38 20-117-23 11 0003 02585 LYDIARD AVE GLENDON J OLSON GLENDON OLSON 2585 LYDIARD AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 11 0015 02445 SHADYHOOO RD 1ST NATL BANK OF NAVARRE 1ST NATL BANK OF NAVARRE CO ROAD 15 A CO ROAD 19 NAVARRE MN 55392 38 20-117-23 11 0021 02565 LYDIARD AVE VALERIA M ELLIOTT VALERIA M ELLIOTT 2565 LYDIARD AVE NAVARRE MN 55392 38 20-117-23 11 0028 02535 SHADYHOOO RD THOMAS C A DEANNA M lEACH THOMAS C LEACH 8460 133R0 COURT apple valley MN 55124 38 20-117-23 11 0031 02465 SHADYHOOO RD 1ST NATL BK OF NAVARRE 1ST lUTL BK OF NAVARRE P O BOX 123 NAVARRE MN 55392 w 10 •i . r .ij; o*- ! ■ J • I ! D To: From: Date: Subject: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator May 18, 1990 #1526 E.W. Blanch, Jr., 3150 Shadywood Road - Sketch Plan - 10 Lot Subdivision Zoning Districts - B-4 & LR-IB Total Area = 31.26 acres Pertinent Ordinance - Please refer to the sketch plan sections within Chapter 11. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Application Cook's Report Zoning Map/Municipal Boundaries Legal Description of B-4 Zoning District Resolution #913 Map Locating Area Receiving Fill or Spoils Sketch Plan The 31+ acre property is the remaining undeveloped lands once owned by the Fresh Water Institute and now owned by applicant, E.W. Blanch, Jr. The property is located within both the cities of Minnetonka Beach and Orono. Lot 1, Block 2 and Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 are located within Minnetonka Beach; Lots 3-9 are located within the City of Orono. Lots 3-7 will achieve ■ ;ess via Old Beach Road; Lots 8 and 9 via Shadywood Road. The City of Orono will work with the City of Minnetonka Beach to complete the comprehensive review. Applicant should advise what the proposed use of Outlots A and B will be and will the use involve the City of Orono lands? Staff has the following comments concerning the proposal within the City of Orono. Lot Configuration - All lots appear to meet the required lot width to the rear of the 35' setback. Lot 9 and portions of Lot 8 are within the B-4 commercial zoning district (refer to Exhibit C). The application is presented as a residential subdivision. The City must ask for the rezoning to LR-IB. The lot lines between Lots 6, 7 and 8 should be realigned so that Lhe obvious building site on the hill be contained within the boundaries of 1 residential lot. The wetlands area within the subject property has been designated as an outiot. To be consistent with Orono's platting regulations, the wetlands area should be incorporated as part of the residential lots and designated as a drainage easement. Zoning File #1526 May 18, 1990 Page 2 of 4 In preliminary discussion with the City Engineer, typically, when a wetland interacts with the adjacent lake such as in this case, the wetland is to be designated at the 931.5' elevation (100 year flood elevation of Lake Minnetonka). The preliminary plat survey must confirm that each building site has at a minimum 1/2 acre dry contiguous land. Applicant may seek credit for wetlands areas as property is sewered. Drainageways that drain to the wetlands within the property via the culverts under Old Beach Road, Shadywood Road and Shoreline Drive must be designated as drainage easements as they flow through lots to wetlands to north and eventually to Lake Minnetonka to the northeast. Access - Staff and City Engineer have reviewed the lots for access purposes and find no concern for lots along Old Beach Road. The City will ask that Lots 8 and 9 share access, somewhere in the neighborhood of the shared lot line, probably where partial drive has been created to lift station on Shadywood Road. It is staff's understanding that Lot 9 is to be acquired by the Fresh Water Biological Institute. If this is the case, access will be provided via the adjacent northern property. Applicant should provide further direction as access to Lot 8 must be defined. The Engineer also asked for the upgrading of Old Beach Road. The City of Minnetonka Beach and the City of Orono should work together to determine what standards/criteria shall be used for the upgrading. The City will ask for the dedication of right-of- way for Old Beach Road as shown on sketch plan. In addition, the County will also review the plat for potential acquisition of right-of-way. Grading/Drainaqe - The subject property was once used to receive spoils from a suction dredging project within Lafayette Bay. The spoils were not placed within the wetlands but were located in the higher elevations. Based on the map locating that area (Exhibit F), it would appear that more than just Lot 4 was involved with the fill, but appears to involve Lots 3, 4, 5 and possibly parts of 6. Applicant's preliminary plan must locate the fill area. This kind of information will be useful for the building staff in determining what lots will be required to provide soil borings. The City will also ask that the basement elevation of each residence be located on each lot. Applicant's engineer is advised to review the sewer as-builts within Old Beach Road. Applicant should provide a drainage study/map of the property. The engineer should locate all drainageways that enter the property along the southeast and north sides to determine impact, if any, upon dry buildable envelopes. V 1 Zoning File #1526 May 18r 1990 Page 3 of 4 Rezoning - As already noted. Lot 9 and portions of Lot 8 are zoned 3-4. Applicant should advise if the Institute plans to acquire Lot 9. There will be a need to amend the zoning boundaries with the formal subdivision application (please review Exhibits C and D, the legal description and zoning map of the district). Sewer/Water Unit Charges - There will be a unit charge of $897.62 for each sewer unit, and there will be no water unit charges for the Orono. It should be noted that these fees are based on the 1990 Fee Schedule and will be readjusted in 1J91 inflationary rate. As the City of Orono provides sewer and water to this portion of Minnetonka Beach, sewer charges for the Minnetonka Beach units will be at the same rate ($897.62/unit). There will be charge of $1,691.78 per water unit for lots within Minnetonka Beach. Applicant shall provide the following information upon the filing of the formal preliminary subdivision application: 1. The formal subdivision application must include a rezoning petition. These fees will also include the engineering fees for a public ro-'d ($900.00 + .50 per lineal foot for portion of Old Beach Road within the City or Orono ). 2. The preliminary plew'» should include the following: A) Wetlands designatea at 931.5'. B) At least within the City of Orono portion, jtlands located within Orono must be incorporated within the boundaries of each residential lot and designated as a drainage easement within that lot. C) Applicant's surveyor to confirm dry contiguous buildable land within building envelope of each lot. ) Plan should show the municipal boundaries clearly. E) Designate the legally defined B-4 zoning line Appl.icant should confirm if Lot 9 is to remain as B— • F) Locate all areas that received fill in 1977-78 dredging and filling project. D D Zoning File #1526 May 18, 1990 Page 4 of 4 G) Basement elevation for each residence shall be designated on each lot. H) Drainageways that intersect the property from the adjacent roadways should be shown if there is impact upon dry buildable envelopes. I) Realigned lot lines of Lots 6, 7 and 8 so that building site on hill is contained within the boundaries of 1 residential lot. 3. Other issues raised by Planning Commission members. 4 CITY OP ORONO P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay* NN 473-7357 55323 ZONING PILE #1526 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice: May 29, 1990 Dennis E. Sandin Landstar Inc. 6100 Golden Valley Road Gold' - ■ . ley, Mn 55422 COPIES TO: E.W. Blanch, Jr. 3500 West 80th Street Minneapolis, MN 55431 TYPE OP APi'LICATION: Other Sketch Plan - Subdivision-10 Lots (7 Lots within Orono, 3 within Minnetonka Beach) DATE OP MEETING: May 21, 1990 VOTE: No formal voted required Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: The Planning Commission conceptually approved the 10-lot proposal. Applicant shall provide the following information, submittals and fees upon the filing of the formal preliminary Subdivision Application: 1. Subdivision Application will also include rezoning petition in addition to the improvement of a public road fee (Old Beach Road portion within City of Orono). Fees are as follows: a. Subdivision/Preliminary Subdivision Application $300.00 minimum fee plus $20.00 plot Total $140.00 Total Subdivision Fee $440.00 b. Rezoning $250.00 c. Public Road Improvement $900.00 plus $.50 per lineal for portion of Old Beach Road within City of Orono - to be paid at time Council determines need to upgrade Old Beach Road when Council acts on preliminary plat. 2. The preliminary plan should include the following: a.Wetlands designated at 931.5' b. Surveyor to confirm dry contiguous buildable lands within buildin-f envelope of each lot (areas above wetland elevation at 931.5' ) c. Locate municipal boundaries d. Designate the existing defined B-4 zoning line (see legal description enclosed) e. Locate all areas that received fill in 1977/78 dredging and filling project Zoning file #1526 May 29, 1990 Page 2 f. Basement elevation for each resident to be designated on each lot q. Drainageways that^ intersect the property from the adjacent roadways to be shown^eal^-'^iSe lot lines of Lot 6, 7 and 8 so that building site on hill is contained within the boundaries of one residential lot presumably Lot 8. At the Sketch Plan Review, applicant advised that the wetlands are to be designated as an outlot and to remain in the ownership of the Institute in order to develop special controls and covenants for the future use of the outlot. Applicant should submit an addendum with the Preliminary Subdivision Application outlining the proposal and provide sample of covenants/controls to be placed on outlot. Please note chat this would be a variance from the normal procedures of the City that ^i wetland areas to be incorporated within the boundaries of each residential lot. In addition, applicant has further advised since the meeting that Lot 8 may be purchased by the University at a future date. If so, the rezoning petition should specify the extent/boundaries of proposed B-4 zoning. Preliminary plans should show existing boundary line and propose exparsio of B-4 (to include Lot 9 and possibly Lot 8) Please contact Jeanne Mabusth at City of Orono (473-7357) any questions concerning the above directives. A copy of the Subdivision Application has been included for your information and use. Please not the filing schedule for all upcoming meetings. To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernharoson X From Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:July 1, 1990 Subject:#1564 JoAnn Grimes/Jim Hoffman, 4720-4730 North Arm Dr W Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-IB, Single family rural residential, 2 acre, unsewered Application - Request for lot line rearrangement to accommodate alternate drainfield site while retaining existing wooded area. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Site Plan with Septic System Site Information Pertinent Pacts - 1.This proposal results in trading equal areas of property. Each property will maintain in excess of the 2 acre minimum lot area requirement. 2.The proposed dividing line actually results in a more uniform and usable situation for both lots. The subdivision that created these two lots was approved in 1983 and left a jogged lot line to accommodate the septic system for the easterly parcel. That septic system has since failed and is intended to be abandoned. The new line opens up additional area to the north for replacement of that system, while giving the westerly lot a more rectangular parcel. 3.Required side setbacks to existing houses will be maintained with the proposed line. 4.It became apparent during this review that vacation of the existing drainage easements and rededication of new easements along the new lot line would be appropriate, since the proposed drainfield will straddle the existing line. Such a vacation was not requested. Staff would recommend that application for such a vacation be submitted by the applicants. This could be handled concurrently at the nominal $50.00 fee, but will require publication and a separate public hearing. Zoning File #1564 July 7, 1990 Page 2 of 2 Discussion - When the original subdivision "McHaney Addition" was developed, the existing drainfield for the house at 4720 extended northwesterly from that house. In order to keep that drainfield within the property boundaries while giving 2 acres to the westerly property, the lot line was joaged around that drainfield, yielding a somewhat contrived lot line. That lot line also left the alternate site for the easterly lot in a relatively less suitable area than had been initially proposed. Applicant Grimes is intending to sell the house at 4720, and a septic system review reguested by the buyer found the existing trench drainfield system to be failing. During inspection of the site with the current and proposed owners, applicants' site evaluator determined that while a septic system might be developed in a number of locations on this property, each of those locations would require extensive cutting of mature trees. The only open area on the property is the northerly triangle to be traded, and Mr. Hoffman to the west was amenable, since his alternate drainfield site would not be affected and his property line would be straightened out. Staff Recomnendation - Staff would recommend approval of this subdivision, finding that each lot maintains the required 2 acre minimum lot area, with the following conditions: 1. Applicants immediately submit a request for vacation of the existing drainage easements. This is not only appropriate, but necessary because the proposed replacement drainfield system will straddle the existing easement. 2. Applicants should then concurrently be required to provide new drainage easements, 5' either side of the new lot line. S4S04CITY OF ORONO - SOBDIVISION APF * ^ ^ ^ PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address AJOKTff U)t6T“- - - - - - - - - Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 0(y ~//7-P»3'Oo \5 ^ ^ Please check one ~ Property _____ abstract or torrens? Cd!^LoT ^ Attach legal description to application, /.of;?, B/_wl Phone (home) llcCi_____ ___ Phone (work) APPLICANT Name . ll'lAliH OiViiVttS__________ AddresT; MM7<^ Ui. 2fj City; ^tlczip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)- - - - - -,,,^,1. Name o AS r\bC[)jL^ ■ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Phone (work) — — — — — — Li^\ ^ i's y. O’V 4 < Address:City:Zip: (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND DSE ^^ SftJGLZ FA/y)i^i' Bur lo,_ uy c^^ Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Dlf&C/f -THC- -X PMPt^rtts. Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total/ all parcels Present Use (check)Residential; no. of units Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 Present Zoning District PROPOSAL X Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites • i Number of Building Sites:Existing Units New Units Total Units i ^ • . Propo si^ Gross Density:a Minimum Lot Size: Units per ^ Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land p£*»fjusegr Use; (check ) r»C Residential Other (specify) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1, Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 2. 3. 4. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. -. -Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement $150.00 250.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision)250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non—residential)300.00 + 20.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney. • Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature d/i Date 6 1/ Owner's Signature Date ^ - gZ/^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicart is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. TO: FROM: DATE; RE: City of Orono^^^ /l Jo.'inn Grimes ‘c\ .lime 1990 ' 4720 North Ann Drive West, Ozunu I am the ouTier of the above-re fere:.ceil property. Dunn? the process of attempting to find a site for a ni:w septic field, it uas discovered that the balance of the land on my pr ‘oj>*rty uas unsuitaVde for such a purix)se. I i'.a'.e met i*it.h mv noiiiiibors that ;>>j'd«-r m’’ i .rcjpjrt y .;.n toe west edge, :r.e Hoflinriiis, and ►••;piain**<i my sir.uar;r,n to rhem. Ti;<j Hoffnians arc agreeable to a rearivir.geii.ent of the lot line dividing car pr.'port:es to aocrmmicriat.e the placement of in.’’ ne'» septic svst.eni. Xt.tached to this letter ar^ ♦■!!••• fcl’owing items: - SulxJivision Application f.jr :i .Subdivision of a Lot Line ReaiTiingemcnt y- Prel iinii;arv pLat information otr Certificate of Survi.*y ✓ _ Certified Frorxrrt" •.'•'■net’s l.isi of <')wn'‘*rs within 35>) - My check for b2:"0.00 Should you !i.a\’e .attv (iintstirins or neni addition:ii intormation, jiiease call either me or my RLV1.T(5R.' Mich.ael Mueller. Micitael’s plionc numt>ers ire: 47;i-95C0 (Office), 472-.">302 (L.oir.e) .and G42-7G99 (voice ixigerl. STUFF hiRe.o7%F H-i6 O^FtCC . Tt^ii /^iKL (p^FFFffAj ----------- r V .1...t (ir i iS :C t- f > RUN DATE 06/20/90 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATJQN SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST REPORT NO. ri6S560l PAGE 21 BATCH 009 PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR ONICR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR SB 06-117-23 23 0001 0003B ADDRESS UNASSIGNED JEANNE T ARMSTRONG JEAN T ARMSTRONG 235 NORTH ARM LANE HOUND MN 55366 30 06-117-23 23 0002 06620 NORTH ARM OR H D A A M H NlffTER DON A HINTCR 6620 flO ARM DR HEST HOUND MN 55366 38 06-117-23 23 0006 00330 NORTH SHORE DR N DARRELL G LATTA ETAL DARRELL G LATTA 330 NORTH SHORE DR H M0U4D m 55366 38 06-117-23 23 0005 06660 NORTH ARM OR N DAL IVERSON DANIEL A LINDA IVERSON 6660 NORTH ARM DR HOUND MN 55366 38 06-117-23 23 0006 06680 NORTH ARM DR TIMOTHY R GRAMENTZ TIMOTHY R GRAMENTZ 6660 NORTH ARM DR H M0Uf4D MN 55366 38 06-117-23 23 0007 06700 NORTH ARM DR N RAD HAIJALA RAYMOND 6 A DOROTHY HAIJALA 6700 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 55366 38 06-117-23 23 0008 00036 ADORESS UNASSIGNED ADHIN OF VETERANS AFFAIRS NORMAN F A LINDA OESTREICH 6760 NORTH ARM DR HOUND MN 55366 38 06-117-23 23 0009 06760 NORTH ARM OR H J A J HEDDERG JOHN A A JANICE HEDBERG 6760 r^RTH ARM DR H M0UI40 MT4 55366 38 06-117-23 23 0010 06760 NORTH ARM OR N ADMIN OF VETERANS AFFAIRS NORMAN F A LINDA OESTREICH 6760 NORTH ARM DR M0UT40 MN 55366 36 06-117-23 23 0013 06730 NORTH ARM OR H R A R HOFFMAN R JAMES A KAREN F HOFFMAN 6730 N ARM DR H HOUND HN 55366 38 06-117-23 23 0016 06720 f40MTH ARM OR H J0ANI4 M GRIMES J0Art4 M GRIMES 6720 NORTH ARM DR H MOUr^O MT4 55366 38 06-117-23 23 0015 00038 ADORESS UNASSIGNED J0AFt4 M GRIMES JOANN M GRIMES 6720 NORTH ARM DR N MOUr^ MT4 55366 TOTAL BATCH 009 00012 #1564 1” 'P . ♦ To: Froa: Date: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator July 12, 1990 Subject: #1536 Steve Gardiner, 3770 Bayside Road Variance (Revised Proposal) - Alley Vacation - Second Review List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Notice of Planning Commission Action 6/21/90 Revised Construction Plans Survey Letter from Mr. & Mrs. Barren, 175 Landmark Dr. Memo & Exhibits of 6/11/90 Sample of Vacation Request Letter from Applicant to Landmark Homeowners Pertinent Facts - 1. The applicant has revised his proposal to do additions only within the existing footprint of the building, with some expansion of storage space on the second floor. This proposal includes the following improvements: a. Replace the existing 10 x 24 easterly wing in the same footprint, providing an adequate foundation. b. Raising the roof along the east/west line of the house to create a more open character in the second story, providing additional closet space for the single bedroom which will be retained. c. Total remodel of main floor within existing footprint. 2. Recall that the existing house is as close as 3.5' from the north lot line where a 30' setback is normally required, and 20' from the west lot line where a 50' setback would be required. The proposed additions extend no closer to the lot line than the existing house. 3. No additional bathrooms or bedrooms are proposed. The additional space created in the second floor is basically storage, and would not appear to increase the potential load to the septic system. 4. Regarding the alley vacation, the City is in receipt of a letter to Mr. Gardiner from the Barren's at 175 Landmark Drive. The Barren's homestead lot does not abut the alley, but they are one of four property owners who are served by and have an interest in Outlet D of "Bayside Landing", the cul-de-sac known as Landmark Drive which does abut the Zoning File #1536 July 12, 1990 Page 2 alley. It is not clear from the letter whether the Barren's are the official representative of the 4 property owners, but they are certainly the most affected current resident served by that road. The applicant has approached the property owners surrounding the alley, and the only response so far has been from the Barren's, who suggest that until the alley is vacated, they have no strong desire to discuss selling their half to the applicant. This would appear to be somewhat counterproductive to the Planning Commission's June 18th recommendation. Discussion Absent any expansion to create more bedrooms or bathrooms, the revised proposal for remodeling, partial foundation replacement, and roof line expansion, should have no impact on the septic system, hence that issue is effectively eliminated. The existing house location near the north and west lot lines might be considered as a reasonable hardship to support a recommendation for approval of the revised additions. With the current property boundaries, applicant has no options available which would avoid needing a setback variance. Planning Commission must decide whether the revised proposal has a significant visual impa-t on surrounding properties, or whether other expansion options should be considered. Regarding the application for vacation, the Barren's petition suggests that if the alley is vacated, the portion adjoining Landmark Drive becomes "part of a lot with lake access". It would seem however that the west half of the alley would be acquired by the Landmark homeowners as an addition to the private road right-of-way, and {Out lot D), Out lot D is not a buildable lot with lake access. The City would in no instance consider that applicant's acquisition of the entire alley gives him any lake access rights. Only Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 2 of Bayside Landing, have lakeshore access over Outlot A. The Barren petition leaves applicant one petitioner short of the 3 petitioners necessary for proceeding with the vacation request. Also, before the Barren's petition can be considered, the City must be assured that the Barren's are the official representative for the Landmark Bomeowners Association (if one exists). The Landmark Drive road outlot currently is listed in Bennepin County property information records as being owned by Austin and Diane Evans, the owners of vacant Lot 1, Block 1. Zoning File #1536 July 12, 1990 Page 3 If the vacation does not proceed. Planning Commission may wish to consider whether relocation of the garage would be an appropriate condition of variance approval. Virtually any such relocation would require variances, but could be a further revision of the current application, if the applicant so requested. Staff Recommendation 1. 2. Isv Staff recommends tabling the vacation request until the required majority of abutting property owners have petitioned for the vacation. Planning Commission should determine whether the revised proposal for improvements minimizes the intensity and character of the requested variances from a level which is acceptable, and should consider whether any further conditions are appropriate if a recommendation for approval is forthcoming. CITY OP OROHO ZONING FILE #1536 Crvstai°Ly! MN 55323 NOTICi: OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 473-7357 Date of Notice: June 21r 1990 mm mm mm mm ^m ^m ^m mm mm mm mm mm TO* Steve Gardiner COPIES TO: 3770 Bayside Road Long Lake/ MN 55356 TYPE OP APPLICATION: Variance Alley Vacation DATE OP MEETING: June 18, 1990 VOTE: 6 For 0 Against Planning Comniission recomniends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Alley vacation tabled pending receipt of petition from a majority of the abutting property owners. 2. Variances tabled, with the following concepts to be further considered : a. Because existing substandard septic system likely cannot be made fully conforming. Planning Commission noted expansion of the house should probably wait until municipal sewer is available. b. Concern was expressed regarding granting variances house expansion while the garage is partially on neighboring properties; applicant to look into acquisition of property from Landmark Drive Outlet A (also, applicant should explore whether he can acquire the west half of the alley if it's vacated). Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as Planning Commission, Monday, July 16, 1990; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. Please contact staff at 473-7357 if you wish to discuss your options. Isv ptsT-TOcuito ^110 ftrf^ fi^w,(MrO J \ f I 6 K T ____:r___H ___.............._ r^^Vo ^^oe fb<i? ■■-.7/(1 ?o I ^ ^pcfW^ /b»Hl'te^'■'tt^-lt^ K-rj=^ pn.^?f^' VHJ «fV|y • :; . I S*------------- T" " ■ "1 ; 1 j 9 1 ( ■1 j ■ -li fHij ^t^eMfti' : 4Mftp^ 9(le»fftt^ hef'/hW'J l2>f*MI!r— •t)Np ofS- ^r!!fi(Mb riizra ^te ♦ \ CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Prepared forJ STEVE AND CARMEN GARDINER ' •.* .** ’ • ■ 4*itH/ t * mm m>pa ^'X ■■'.yr te-i k.^: ■ ; ■nmm ■X OTfCf ««« 1 >: r o' MR. 3TEVE GARDINER 3770 BAYSIDE ROAD LONG LAKE, MN. 55356 JULY 9, 1990 ■> km: ii I Dear Steve, We would like to see the city vacate the alley between your property and the Landmark homeowners with title to the Easterly 15 feet to be deeded to you and the Westerly 15 feet deeded to the Landmark property owners. The city may consider this correspondence as a petition from us to vacate the alley. mBx:: ■•'V’ ’v We iiave some dil’flcuiLy witli your c^pparent Jesiro to combine the vacation of the property with acciuIritis th« pi ope' ty from us when we currently do not own it. It seems to me that by combining all the issues you have made it complicated enough so that no one will act for fear that the outcome will have an ufianticipated ending. •• ‘ ' We have read the City of Orono Planning Commission meeting minutes of June 13, and concur with their tabling your request for variances for the reasons stated in their minutes. Incidently, We are more inclined to accept the idea put forth by the City to soil part of outlet O than to grant an easement for the property under your garage. In any event you should remove the junk stored dehind the garage b»ecauso it is an eyesore. If the City vacates the alley, the portion adjoining Landmark Drive becomes part of a lot, w.l.th lake access.. Consequently, We have no interest in negotiating from your present position. After the vacation process has been completed by you, we will be interested in pursuing this further. ■.y N tmimm sincerely. V ^4. m ■' i Vi;-:-S''"* mmx::mmmi ‘I'y. LEE & JULIE HARREN 175 landmark OR- ;• -id.-''dV-: CC:CITY OF OI^ONO LONG LAKE. AH. 55C56 To: From Date: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator June 11, 1990 Subject: #1536 Steve Gardiner, 3770 Bayside Road - Alley Vacation - Setback Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-lA, Single family lakeshore residential, 2 acre, unsewered Application: A) Request to vacate 30' alley adjacent to property. B) Request for side and rear setback variances to construct main floor and 2nd story additions. List of Exhibits I. 1. Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - »» x,y. Request for Street Vacation Application Variance Application Plat Map Property Owners List Applicant's Letter of Request Survey Construction Plans Hardcover Review Letter to Applicant 10/29/86 Septic Capability Diagram ■Z - Vacation of Alley - 2. Applicant's property consists of 4 tiny lots within the plat of Ottoville on Lake Minnetonka, platted in 1887. That plat extended to the west side of the alley in question, therefore, if this alley is vacated, its ownership is split down the middle between the property owners on either side. In this case, the west half would go with Outlots C and D of the plat of d.iyside Landing, and east half would go the applicant. There are no City utilities within the alley, and none proposed. Municipal sewer contemplated for this area would not make use of the alley. Staff is currently requesting verificat ^on from other utility companies as to existing or expected use of the alley. / Zoning Pile #1536 June 11, 1990 Page 2 of 4 3. Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.12 requires that vacation of an alley requires a petition by the majority of the land owners abutting the property to be vacated. Technically, there are four property owners abutting this alley, as can be noted from the plat map. Therefore, technically, the vacation cannot proceed until at least two more abutting owners join in the petition. Technically, Mr. Burger at the end of the alley would not gain any land, but the other three owners would. 4. One of the concerns of vacating the alley is whether it will limit access to other properties. Currently, all properties abutting the alley have their main legal access at some other location. The only property that could conceivably benefit from this alley would be that of Hazel Anderson, directly north of Gardiner, which does not abut a public or private road, except that her property abuts Outlot C of Bayside Landing, a driveway outlot to serve a new residence north of the wetland. Also, Mrs. Anderson presumably has an easement across John Burger's property along Gardiner's north lot line, to use the driveway shared by Gardiner and Anderson. If Mrs. Anderson has such an easement (this must be verified), vacation of the alley would not deny her access. 5. The Public Works Director notes no problems with allowing the vacation. II. Variance Application - 1. Applicant is proposing to construct a second story addition and eastward expansion of the existing house, in addition to revising roof lines. This house is currently considered by staff as a 2 bedroom house, and is proposed to be converted to 3 bedrooms. 2. Exhibits X, Y and Z indicate the allowable building envelope under 3 scenarios: a) the existing property; b) the existing property plus half of vacated alley; c) existing property plus entire alley. In each case, expansion of the house eastward requires a setback variance to allow a north lot line setback of 4* where 30* is required. Zoning Pile #1536 June 11, 1990 Page 3 of 4 A variance would similarly be required for conversion of the deck on the south side of the house to a screen porch, since portions of that 4‘5ck are less than 30' from the north lot line. Side street lot line setbacks would be required also under the first 2 scenarios. If applicant acquired the entire alley, his house would be at the 50' required setback from Landmark Drive. 3. Hardcover within the existing property boundaries is within the prescribed limits. However, much of the driveway and existing garage are outside of applicant's property. The most reasonable and consistent method for determining a hardcover percent would be to presume that applicant will gain half of the alley, and credit him for his existing property, half of the alley, and the area of his improvements that occur outside his property. This is shown in Exhibit H. Having spent more than an hour reviewing hardcover numbers on this application, my estimation is that the proposed additions per the architect's plan, fall within the letter and intent of the hardcover ordinance under the assumptions noted above. III. Discussion ~ Septic Systea Concerns The existing system is extremely substandard, even after drainfield additions that were done in 1987. Those additions were done on an interim basis (see Exhibit I). There is one relatively small septic tank, and approximately 400 square feet of drainfield. Making reasonable assumptions about the Kilkenny loam soils mapped in this area, one would expect a perc rate of 30-45 minutes per inch, requiring 300 s.f. of drainfield per bedroom. The proposed 3 bedroom house should have 900 s.f. of drainfield, but less than half of that exists. It is unlikely that the existing system could be upgraded to serve a 3 bedroom house within the setback and design requirements of the septic code. From Exhibit J, expansion area is very limited, even with additional land from the alley. There would not be room available to develop a mound system if soil conditions indicated one was required. No testing has been submitted. Based on this, staff would not recommend approval of expansion of this house to 3 bedrooms unless municipal sewer was available. A decision by the City Council whether or not to sewer this area is still pending. Zoning File #1536 June Hr 1990 Page 4 of 4 Staff Recoarondation - Regarding the alley vacation, staff would request tabling pending the following additional submittals: 1.Petition signed by a majority of the neighboring property owners for vacation of the alley. 2. Verification that the Hazel Anderson property has a legal easement across the Burger property (and the Gardiner property) to Bayside Road. 3. Confirmation of no objection from the utilities which may currently or potentially use this alley. Regarding the setback variances. Planning Commission should consider whether expansion of this house entirely within the 30' rear yard setback is appropriate, or whether applicant should consider expansions southward away from the north lot line. Finally, staff would recommend that the proposed expansion to create a third bedroom (or the potential space for a third bedroom), not be approved until such time that municipal sewer is available to the property. Alternatively, applicant should provide septic testing and design work to show that this property can support and develop a septic system meeting all code requirements for a 3 bedroom house, plus an alternate site for equivalent septic expansion. 1 r. CITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION 'I PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address .^7 70 Property Identification Nximber (P.I.D.) 5~-111'2-^----—P ____ P. OF DR[W^ '—OFFICE Please attach legal description to application if not includj^Ol^^J^^ ^ on required survey. ri^ t>_ APPLICANT Phone (home)—V 7Tl0:QT ir Name _ Address -Sr«v/P, (ycX Phone (work) 05/10M *^770 Rc\______ City <0/O»no Zip OHNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ Address Phone (home) Phone _ _ _ _ City _ _ _ Zip Date Property Acquired _____________________ (n'outh/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. mm mm mm mm mm mm ^m ^m mm ^m mm mm mm ^m mm mm mm mm mm mm mm ^m mm ^m mm ^m mm mm mm ^m FEES - CONDITIONAL OSE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more - , , Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75’ of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 Commercia.l Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $250.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property 1^Residential C zher (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST 2 ^ i a p ' Describe request in detail: i/arjJ-€- pO ujist o' 1 2. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan* if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application* please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11" X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete Initials of Clerical Staff; _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ . Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator* agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application* and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date s/l / q 0 OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff* consultants* agents* commission members* and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before th® Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting* please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. s J CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application r’ee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) 1 PROPERTY LOCATION r r 7v r,i^T Y OF rr nccTrr Site Address *^,7 70 6aus. >1j> Pr)/(cl , CVo^o 5^^ _____ qji rry ^75,^ ™ R 175.00 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) OfT-IlT- 2.'^ "TM" O\b0 >IE^£IPT~TYMK )W ------- ci)Ol W/TJJ-O' COOi i<01T10:0 c) io"7. vi/lO/joio^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Neune ^5-Kv/g. Address; 3770 s\.c(o City; Phone (home) ^ 7(o- OSV _ _ Phone (wor)c)_ Z_p: OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (worJc) Address;City;Zip; Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present 7se of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Lo^tCO - /OOpOQ Describe request in detail; (Lus*' ^ crdct -rull ________________________________________________— i * VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) Other HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; amt/s /o-f- aci 10 Ce*^ \/^c<s.i<A Auia^ 'B. DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements; -fAj, /<• pUceJ -tA- h^p O ^_^ pyCpQ>/*'7’ //I-1. 2. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A NORKING COPY (11* X 17” OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above Infonaation has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to best of his/her knowledge. Date ^ O_ _ __Applicant's Signature ONNBRS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before ths Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. f . Adjacent Property ofaj^ I (we) ^ (print name(s)] OUJ STTB of 3 775* BAUSice. f^D [print addrd^sj have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at S^IO Rp^ also referred to as Land Use Application No. _ _ _. I (we) understand that in executing this ac)cnowledgement, I (we) am (are) not aslced to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor’s project or use 'a.\94 *.£9*40'f ,f#69*44* 16*» •-9 C5 PT C^ LOT 53 S (5) .’5 *• ••________T ? U59*35'4i*f 575. n 077 ^•^9*44' !6*t ’4*. 5 f o.**33 Sd7*f ^63 vw>^5747«->^433♦'34 41*t' r >o«) X 2 (34)> 35 y 33 ; •Z t ^ / i I05> Ol A .i siV , 6i V * ) HO—d^'!>x V(A ^ \V ' N •'"5. \ 9\ \ ' 1 '*'$■ r 115; .A:*' Ok \ t 4^ C3 ^ .. •.'5% « 14 V t3 0«r '0(54)"1 (53) ‘ 1h• 4 a 3)r ih)i U3 TT '4 (5?)1 1 1 ► ”j _J p* 1;>• —j i; / a 11 1 j 5 • ^yw ^ *3<\s ■ ’5 •ii M5) ' (4 1 1 M\ 1 3 1 ,% 17 1 ;•* : 4 N t 1. v ‘ to r 9 ( 5 i 1 r ) 7 6 r ¥ a s. 5 V '5 M A-J. >0 9 a •-'»r 3 ' :*'9 s»c.a .^ j <.» ; (9) JJ' . W ’ ’ r > . (10)m.« ! 0 . ' f 3 (67 > V 73»: VW9. <3 :'X 1(7 / S- 90 / ( 12) 5 ??'.e3 ?■ 84 / C ( 13) 6 ,'i' 516. C6 ^ '?i» ■V ^ J 5^' 07 /ll (14) r * ' 4 /T *>»■' 9» * 1 9' ^a 17 0 -- ^ 1 "~^\’»''T-----\ / /1 1 A - / / 7 ^\959 »/0 'r i i Q Vi- RUN DATE 06/01/90 BATCH 001 PROP ADDR (»f«R NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 3B 05-117-2S 21 0005 03760 BAYSIOE RO HAZEL ANDERSON HAZEL ANDERSON 3780 BAYSIOE RO LONG LAKE NN 55356 HENNEPIN COUNIY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST —38 05-117-23 21 0015 03750 BAYSIOE RO JOHN BURGER ETAL JOHN BURGER 3750 BAYSIOE RO LONG LAKE MtJ 55356 REPORT NO. P1435A01 PAGE 1 38 05-117-23 21 0016 03700 BAYSIOE RO J B MAUS A J E HAUS JAMES B S JOAN E MAUS 3700 BAYSIOE RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 PROP AODR 0»t4ER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AODR 38 05-117-23 22 0010 00055 LANDMARK DR GARY N « VICKIE J ROSS GARY N A VICKIE J ROSS AO SMITH AVE NAYZATA rtl 55391 38 05-117-23 22 0011 00175 LANDMARK OR L C BARREN A J M HARREN LEE C A JULIE M HARREN 205 LINOAWOOD LA HAYZATA IBJ 55391 38 05-117-23 22 0012 00098 ADDRESS lAMSSlGNEO BETTY L MINER BETTY L MINER C/0 PETERSON A FISHERMAN PA 3109 HEmcPIN AVE S MPLS MN 55908 *4 :* n PROP AODR OWNER NAF« TAXPAYER NA1E/ADDR PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODRi 38 05-117-23 22 0013 00098 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED GARY N A VICKIE J ROSS GARY N A VICKIE J ROSS 90 SMITH AVE HAYZATA FW 55391 38 05-117-23 23 0036 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED EST OF ANDREW MINER CITY OF ORONO 38 05-117-23 23 0039 00255 LANDMARK OR EST OF ANDREW MINER AUSTIN H A DIANE EVAFTS 520 FARHILL RO HAYZATA m 55391 38 05-117-23 29 0069 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED J B MAUS A J E HAUS JAMES B A JOAN E MAUS 3700 BAYSIOE RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 23 0035 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED EST OF ANDREW MIfJER AUSTIN H A DIANE EVANS 520 FARHILL RD HAYZATA Tt4 55391 38 05-117-23 29 0070 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED J 0 MAUS A J E MAUS JAMES B A JOAN E MAUS 3700 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE TtT 55356 G PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAVER NAME/ADOR 38 05-117-23 29 0082 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED DANIEL P CAHILL MRS DANIEL CAHILL 229 N 5TH ST DELAVAN HI 53115 38 05-117-23 29 0083 00038 ADDRESS UNASSlGt4ED JOHN BURGER ET AL JOHN BURGER 3750 BAYSIOE RD LONG LAKE tV4 55356 38 05-117-23 29 0089 00038 ADDRESS UTUSSICNEO JOHN BURGER ET AL JOHN BURGER 3750 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE T94 55356 Cu G c PROP AODR OFtTER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 38 05-117-23 29 0100 ' 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED SAC GARDINER STEVE GARDINER 3770 BAYSIDE RO LONG LAKE Tt4 55356 38 05-117-23 29 0101 03770 BAYSIOE RO sac GARDirJER STEVE GARDINER 3770 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 7 56 05-117-23 2<i 0102 00058 ADDRESS UTMSSIGNED SAC GARDINER STEVE GARDIf4ER 5;;0 BAYSIDE RO LOTK: lake MN 55556 7- N •f f G r-:-. tf r;. r if Q RUN DATE 06/01/90 HEM4EPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI<i55401 PAGE 2 BATCH 001 PROP AODR OHNER NAT^ TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR ^ *PROP ADDR ONT^ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR 58 05-117-23 26 0103 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED SIC GARDINER STEVE GARDINER 3770 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 26 0105 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE LAND DEPT STATE LAND DEPT COrTVEYAfCE PENOirTG 38 05-117-23 26 Dili 03775 BAYSIDE RO G R A CE RONLETTE GERALD L ROHLETTE 3775 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE NN 55356 38 05-117-23 26 0115 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO STATE LAT40 DEPT CITY OF ORONO PARK 6/13/79 ST DEED 156753 38 05-117-23 26 0116 00038 ADDRESS UrUSSIGl4ED STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF OROtW COrr/EYEO 2/8/82 ST DEED 161168 TOTAL BATCH 001 00023 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE At(D TRUE REPRESE.iTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE CP4 THE RECORDS OF THE HEII.EPIN COUtiTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERIY TAXATJCH, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. / / DATE /Mm c o ••• • ; ■ ■ •' :v .• ■ -'.. > ■■•vr-’- ,rrz<r\ .®V^>-. ■ •-V-w. J.- !■ >- . ; v*;'f V;:^ .;■ 'i , V, mm» me^m W- ■ V. ■ . A-’', ■' ' : ir ’ ■ i '^■* ’i"' *'• ' . ' ' > ■ I' ' ■■ ■ ;?:/•• ^-v. -'4-‘4-: *y : - ' 44f . v ^jr ioy < •' 1 • • • • • 3770 Saysida Rd Orono, MN 55356 Iprif To: The City Of Orono, Enclosed are two applications concerning rny proposed plans for remodeling my house at 3770 Bayside Road. The first application is for the vacation of a city alley that is west of my property. In discussing the vacation with Orono city officials, there is a question whether the adjacent property owners would be entitled to half of the alley because they are in a different subdivision or plat. Enclosed is a check for $250 for the vacation fee. The second application is for a zoni.-ig variance for a lot under the 2 acre minirnurr.. The house was o<riginally built in 1905 and remodelled 2 years before I bought it in 19S3. No building permits were issued for that remodeling. Much of the new remodelling I am p*lanning concerns bringing the building up to the building codes. The remodel 1ing will be extensive. The remodel 1 ing 'will ^:'-^0!'!d the east wall four feet and add a new second story. The large deck shown in the p-lans will not be built but the existing deck might be turned into a three season porch. The remodelling will be done by Sylvestre Construction who has rernodellad many beautiful houses in the Orono area. Another large issue will be the septic/sewer system. It is my hope that the city sewer does ge"?:- oipproved so a new septic system will not be needed. With a addition of drain fields we installed three years ago, our septic system has been adequate for che cwo peop-ia living here. Enclosed is a check for $175 for the varistnce application fee. Plectse contact me at work (330-5233) if you need any further information. ‘ *4 ;■ ! ■ s . .p.r- ■■ *: $ ■ ^ ■ ■ *v .•„• ^'t? •M ... r ■.• ’ .t . •• , -V ix ■4' • i'■/•••• -I"-' '■'1M- ' '■'i • r- .■*.'t ' ■ ■ ■ t : ■ . _T ■ '■•1 ■r*. i t fitW Aa-rf,?/ L • . . f* -'.* r-■ : * . - hr S J * • ' ^ .w . . .! m* •mr i 0* . [t : :' %* • i•. ' • »# » ■ - • m •• «a •• 4^ '»-«m VA/vt^ /yiAIAj puxxz. - .S77AJ C.l>* ; iM.. :.. ir* - • ,f'* *‘^»»** ^ A (^a. .: .A3«^r ifC', ;i •• :x rrar «sn : ;/r:.;^*- iCt^ . tII ^-i—^ - I X - , *. y . •• X *i-1- •, - r*.*. ■• •• • • tf • " * • •*.««l »#Mk. ar^—> (Li-•.# 4U«%*•rr. • -:i^j .«• , e\ S.i ^ . ' i 1: . 1! i I i • I!! h I ^ '!,!•■.l.I I) U, >■ ' .11;.1.1.11.' • •• -• • •Mmm- * • •». • •• ■*•" * • i ••• * f-]F V*^. ; f f.^ JR* .' |»-T ^ . •• •#« .1^ -».4# • . «* '.i ^ 5. T r. i is *. ;xis , ♦ • ^**5 i'. • ••*• .• ^ ■-.-; • -r- ^ •;l?' •«. »« «fc i **^4M I a. kry0’^ ■•• ' . *♦• ^ ^ *4 . •. • 4yr -..fajrWl »«r •*• " •• » •a# a # /:T'\rr.V- • • - •^•rt ^ ^ • ..ju - *.r r.4 .-I'..* »»• . •». • - - -*• * *^Vr IIIII 111 11 111.^•■•v r'y. I .- - 1 ■ 1 f ; i t I 1 ! <, 1 : j i —Ij ' ltd • # .. .f* -KW-- • ■^. .> I 1[L-1;. rV^ liiiiii;-nmi . "~r. .r.i • , 1 i : I ; • • / ;!! 1 li.nillJJ CX/fUr/i fcrf»ifjNC? Ha^ miiKi.- :- ~r - - - *'. • 0m, #M m * ' -^T- » *» , f *V • • K.* i ; UJLx^L u .. « ■ » ^iVK IS* 4 *;^*»**^>^~* ^ ■.— •nAf • • - V-rx'^*:^.: rf - .ia • It • ;j i- -.V .. ^ i-a ,i*‘V;;, ■*. • • • • ‘ ?.*.. ’A . > ‘‘4 » •-- ^«*0 ,m . aa.«.. «• . . • ‘1 ■!•'.. • t ” '* ■ ’v-ifSKa- » *«#■ St €■ ■*■ ■ ygWL Jr• -i • .. /DVC W o ^ r ■ ‘ rEifcrgjf j ;, a L- 0,5 o13 }:l.‘ ^ BiKr-- <V|V •• ... * X ' ^ Ilf" f=7U>0\ .^A^: vvjs^ Jirrry .............- r.- . * 4l^a4to^ I»4 # ■• JCm &r»aita« a» . • • m,m m M . -. arrr" *. .1 , izxl .1 aJ-t. r’ ^ Jl ^:'. ,1.;. .IXi: JKC tfC.« • ^ ^ ^ **•.••. • . • V ^ #*■.• . • • . ..a ‘a •. • • * ^ • - «r*t , ' a . . • . • • ' . 4 a • * . I .* . ;'.* "T*#** ^ .•*♦-•* a a» • * * «| .1^ • • *• % -a , !tt a f » • J w •u , ..A. /: :: .-r- : ^ i.. r. **: : I. ..a* ! ■ I •» « ri jitW r ,.< • • <•«« •■ * a»> ' • ... -t a«*a» a a . ■• • r* • • a a 9 ..« • • a* -aa^.'^ -a* *• •'■ •* • a • • »•• • a« • ».««. .«' • • .a a t* • a«» ••» » .a •*.>.«« • » ..«* • K‘ •V.4 c." a*.• ' •••*.^* • . «' • r -i * *.•a * a • . • .. I i-rw L jp:.. •'.'!.X* '"* '.Jba. t. utk •:'v . i • •* . 'a a »V* • •• • - ’2S X H , V • rr>:i.: Sii- -*V : ^ « -ir>tl .«^VC4 .•i?- -rr •• . \ . ■• *i** . • *•». • ZiT * •vT: ?•* %..* r ?t» ? . ^- r-f5-*»•. *5 • ** ^ ^ •J U t . .rt?f(2l* * i . . - u. - « •. • » •r t .. i. • ■» -^-» .-i ^.twc. • ^ « •• % • . (• A- .r . •.• ' M • •0» r. • ^- i»«4« -•'^'-» ‘ ^ ^ m ■^• ** m . t ., X^' . • <• I «>< II ~,m»- » m 0 ••‘-.***--’'*^,*»^. ^ > f ' f*“ ., ^4 r- ^•r.- - : *%^*;*iy ttv ▼ ^••..r % r • e.*^ ... * 4 !• . • 55 ' • -. ‘ ' Tr i-^JUSKwa i-s -.au;:. * • /. - -♦•• :-t:.iv -_ . ^rasrfergnrr^ • ,, .* r*^x .. V J•Jrx..^4;.'•*4ivc V I w-.* • • • r ^ - 4. -• .' r ' 1 - •*• •* •-- r -* . .• rw •- - - - .... .. , . . •., ,• * ., - f ■ .* ^ 4.: - - u.r *.v ' r r : • i. .-Tw— •*: ».;•• - . , N.. •••: .i:., . • : . 4* • V^* - * w-.*.»•- • --• «•• •Jt •ax ^ * - • * •» nT'^v?:-*- * *^t ,■.m •*i» ■ •'. .»••»« • .%• ft* r.i«v..;b# * *.•»• »0., .•< r '■. , p .• *• ,,* • . *'. * .•« ^x. : ••4^-V--'. r- 1 •;7*- tSrflX • «. lAT ! . *\-y\ k ^ .f.. y. • •:»•.. - -•%- 0P>» • • .1* • X if“* t ^ -• ■! N • •- : '•^ .^?'.'■* .' * •■•*• ^.M<* »• ;-* • V '?;.n ^#IV!;r\i.'''-^ ••< ?v-- - • ■'’• r- '7 V* •» • *<i4.«V .* •••••,, ->••». '% !*• • V * ■ .K.'* ' ‘ 4'W - .'i • r:- A *r- V .>•■' • T ’ .f ■ •;• .'c,^ ', .H t ■•-* W-" .J'.'W.'.'Wv •.* f •* - — rr • l iX. V «• 4* L .1* M ^ « *#• • •> r f' / •%% ye>* . W/jXi.i ■ ■ ■ j i‘» i'>'''r': rmirtmiin -f- n? - ^?iW* . ^*04'■ • • . 1 .» n 4^*f. . ynKLip-iiiftK.uuMi;^ . ••*•**5 ’*- •SEsMiaatjaKt.;-. *1 ^ A4k!gft^. •> • 4*r* •». ■ 1* 1 ' ir «*# *.*««. ' ••w 4»;I«ilik.. « i. 4 • i 4 -> 1 »«.*»•• liuu:;- lilHii-- j i : I ) ..I / \ |flX>€5 f / .-i r------p !» • •• ••• •■ •• guv/^i?ry r . ,> .T . ;»r* • ■ • \ T ‘ r*r -t . * < L' ^ *■*»—* .• • • ^ •• • • • • •»> ^ - • ,•4• « • • • « I!«i ..... ■:''-7r‘:jSi;-^; zzri . !•• •• •• • I 2. m * • % * m 4»* t • • » Jtf*< •'. • ■' . . • . • • . ♦ I V. »*• «* ' « *» <* 0» ^ ... • « • tm^’% .... . ..C m .JC. ./A . ^ 4 !•» * 4^ - V ■ jx .^.r if •, • . • t’*-* .»* .'. H • « ^ * ■ • *••• *•» »4 * • -» . • •* . j. ■, • • * ' *- . . • «Jw .1. ...M *.. m m ■ »■»• 0 - . • • • ■; • ■ ' * • • I" • • • .M -. - «>• J •• • *f . : 'f **^ • • ^ I /\iorzT7^ • •«; »•» w I rJ • .,J .ri.74 rxt u •• • ' * ■ . vJ r^ . 4» *.A.« * • . *».« • • • » . • . . 7 .... 4. . • •« • . •.•••#! • «. r. JLt •• •»«« % « . . .44*. - • * / ^y. 2-. X2Vi2 7.y^i ...... __^ ^ S ___ ]>rc|^ ;o>^z>f CoKiC. flfci:, ^ (WIO^j6» ^.2->'ZC?.2 - I 2^C^ fd/2:r7oSri )0y">/‘ !©) 9ir A12/- S70 ;s/8S •= BS-'i'? ii-, . 2S-i«i ^ 75'“^ 5 ,f. 0 . S/^Sfl^ l^oAb '-f^>r<?rC. *7^' ^.^0 . •• / • ......... 1^2^S'=i6. r/7 ............. ' —__________-.- ..................... - ’. 4>'/. .4V ^ T-VT)...../5b '.................. ' if —/sr .- /2-C»—1 2,Cc _ - zr —zs^ ^70 — ?2>r =11^ ‘^ 1 ■' 1tSi a jAj P.ccf^*rv7 cr^ pacru^T'/ loru'^ t /S» 2j V //O gc/«fjTij_ PAiP* ICi>or-~?<X>it^-^^-^°' ;>bo>?s/;^ -g/oao :&w/<v /N ikxAJs^=^s:*-v-):>-(joy-vB/^-k- .;/sJ .suvirP^tM O.L. ti^ :&.>•/jr2<?.|)-i2t, ».6>l'5 _«*. <ku->R«r '!y^2oPos&^i‘/^c>mo^-<5?^ KC-. ___t<S..—6^ '^ZH _________tfS___ _ h^rui^ JOX2^ D»(?C^ 2) X/ Co .JdAY- /^A'tsvt^^p' 7/”'2.rO ' /'^c.C. ■^k^'USyi ^ ~ :>r. Ar/Us'L Ci^ 7S"'2J^' ''‘^'^U, 4Tr.jnrtettfr? *• /32> •*• ^51 l&tA^ “T>3'''2-^rO 0X^4- fr^Poic^^ - o'Fp Lot- < ‘?)2- /(9S>o X^o 6^/3T7/viC ffO UO *T“ C//2T7^/ <1» ^<?f- O K i2.^7- ^rz-o-^ ^7-”^ cy^irtvcr S7 3.er>^* //*J ?ri::>(>/ . /A-» Lo :T7r ^a J ^'u LC ”/ (f (^. C.^*^ Pr L^L^^f c7 CO c> f^i2-oPc> s<j*Ci 2^S> /f 2.3rO'S-oo' A.'le-L Qr/c.L.. PrUjr-f = 2-5"-u 2,50 - /AJCA-. ^ “ 7^^"l 1-- 2,:>T> * roo' Iao <-«-. pvc<r^ • 2S2-®r s“A . - 5379 \ • ^Pc.fCcJ^'T ~?^'V^' - /S, / S'?) /^2^; ......................................... /,oSe^ E/f^r?t^<=» A'2--oF41^U?7 <^)AJ Uo ) /S=^2J7^> ' - '7S"' ^ - ^ f2~ G 5^S /^j:)^T70AJr /02>^ T^“Uji6^ €.lAi'2.(s<S0^ 2^!^h>0 s t. ^ ^S^O Cc^ ^Z^2-^ l^2X> 7 5t> 7 a/ ^vugtfW -500 .............. __________________- vrr2.rO ‘____________ p^osrt:»F £i>arnA*<i.-?^._2,gjU •,- f ABlIy^5’^‘f .rrW>,ya.^ 4 2,aU^756C> y S3T7r • •.?ir)04isT.\ . /-. • • •I .. .. . , _______/ CITY of OEONO Post Office Box 66.Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323.Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka October 23, 1986 Steve Gardiner 3770 Bayside Road Long Laker MN 55356 Re; Septic System Repairs Dear Mr. Gardiner: On October 16, I visited your property at your request to review your septic system. I noted the following; 1. There is one septic tank of apparently about 650 gallons capacity. (Code for new systems requires two tanks of 1,000 and 750 gallons respectively.) 2. This tank is located 30' from your well. Well apparently was installed in 1973 with little regard for it's proximity to the septic system. A minimum of 50* well-to- septic tank setback is required by the State Health Department. However, given the 111' depth of your well and the clay layers it penetrates, I doubt that you would ever experience any contamination problem. 3. The drainfield, apparently located east and south of the septic tank, is discharging to the surface and you are correct in assuming that it needs some work. The extent of your drainfield is not known, but I suspect it is no more than 200 s.f. or so. Your property is located in the Stubbs Bay Sewer Study Area. The City is currently studying the possibility of extending municipal sewers to serve portions of the developed area around Stubbs Bay. Although the City has not reached any final conclusion on where sewers will go and what properties will be served, I see your property as a likely candidate to be sewered, and it would be unwise and unfair to require you to replace your system with a totally conforming system if it will not be needed in a very few years. BUILDING A ZONING - 473-7337 ASSIiSSING ADMINISTRATION A FINANCE - 473-7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 Steve Gardiner, 3770 Bayside Road October 29, 1986 Page 2 of 2 Given these facts, and given that you are concerned about your septic system surviving the winter, it seems appropriate that you install some additional drainfield as an interim measure* It appears that you could install one or two drainfield lines, running north-south, to the east of your existing drain- field line, using drop boxes. You probably will be able to add from 200-400 square feet of drainfield. It appears that this new drainfield can be placed so it will be well above lake level a. d be at least 50' from your well. Considering that this is an interim measure, we will not require soil testing. You should be aware that even if you do add drainfield, the system will not be considered as meeting all current code standards for a new septic system. In order to be totally in compliance, you would have to 1) install new precast concrete tanks meeting a 50' setback from your well; 2) have soil testing completed and construct a drainfield system based on the soil and water table conditions on the site, and being at least /5 from the well. I think it is unlikely that you could construct a totally conforming system on your small Icc. I am enclosing a list of contractors licensed with the City to install drainfield systems. Your contractor must obtain a permit before commencing work. Please contact me at 47^—7357 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Michael P. Gaf-fron, Asst Planning s Zoning Administrator MPG/tln Enclosure - Sketch - List of Licensed Septic Contractors Prepared for*. CERTIFICATE OF STmir^r^y AtU) CAJa-ll.N CAHlJlfJl.K CO 'fSfcf”nC CArr^(L|^n '/' - '"fiAbt-tiMi'cr /^VAJ, i:« i ijt\^ I -?ONE 0 to 75 75 to 250 250 to 500 • I • • « 1 t AREA AREA COVERAGE /^ - Z07.36> — K « IJi/1 IS J ' / • ,^'N /- vlV .T' -♦ I ^ 5V'*'•14 ZONE AKEA CUVEKAOE 0 to 75 75 to 250 250 to 500 — ________/f r.• Z07.34> •»■ ! Grml TO: THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: STEVE GARDINER 3770 BAYSIDE ROAD ORONO, MN RE: ITEM 1536 ENCLOSED ARE COPIES OF THE LETTER I SENT TO THE LANDMARK HOMEOWNERS AS A RESULT OF THE SUGGESTIONS OF THE JUNE 18 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. fnjf ^ar I ‘r'A ' I i n: CITY OP ^'’ONO 1 2 M( r •July •1390 Dear Mr Au-^xin avans. 1 uan'C zo T^hank you for “he tis-e you spenz discussing the alley vacation during “he '-eekend :>f June 16 and l;.^My present plans include postponing enlarging my house but i would like to pursue vacating the city alley that exists between mv lot at 37tQ Bayside Road and Landm-^rK Drive^ If the vacation of the -30 ft aiiey taxes place. It1 V.would go to the Landmarx Home Owners and 15 iwvouxd -^e added to ny lot. I would then like to buy the 15 it Ox alley the Land.tiark Home Owners would receive and get a easement for wnere .tv carage extend.s into tne Liancimark outlet .Also, I would be very interestec in ruying a portion of Out lot —‘ ■ na Drive. west Cx tne allev lut east oi nanomarx neec our help in: .rigning aa petition allowing the vacation or alley. I. Agreeing to the sell 15 ft of the allev and j’^antinc an easement lor my garage. -i .nis is acceptable with the other Landmark Home Owners The price I am willing to pay for the lot is negotiable. The oart of the alley x want to buy is approximately 15*ft by 165 ft f.C5 of an acre). It seems that lot trices in our area without _akeshore acces.s .?*:fems to be about .3.30.000 - .340.000 an acre. I calculated .530.000 X . 0 5 = 31.3 3 0 . Please discuss my proposal witn t.ne other property owners. Also, please respond with the enclosed letter by July 13 so I may report your decisicn to the Oreno Planning Commission on July 15. The Landmarx Home Owners are; Austin Evans - 475-3113 Lee Harren - 473-0340 Richard Kyle - 471-9533 Gary Ross - 476-0655 Thank you for your time and I hope to be hearing you soon. Please call me at work (330-5283) or at home (4/6- 0254) if you have any questions. Steve Gardiner 3770 Bayside Rd. Orono. MN 55356 J To: FroB: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building s Zoning Administrator Date: July 10r 1990 ri\^i"s\l*^c\^\r3r-”conUniation of Public Hearing Additional Exhibits Exhibit I - Cook Report Pvhihit J - Cook Sketch Exhibit K - Planning Commission Action Exhibit L 1-3 - Agreements to Dedicate Right of Way Owners to North Exhibit M - Engineer's Addendum Exhibit N - Revised Preliminary Plan Review of Current Application - Preliminary subdivision application was tab^^ ri?/fe‘ „°^t/t;l^t\^Te%\/e"d'°p\”rn\°Jpritartnt^^ £ seeKs lot width variances for Lots 1 and 2 as follows; - Property Lot 1 -Required - 140' (rear front street setback line) Proposed » 70' (original plan 68 ) Variance =70* or 50% Lot 2 - Proposed » 121' (original 121.4') Variance =19' or 13% Applicant has noted (Review Exhibit H) that to fot t?d\h*“bl\n'cu^^“ha^°ra^\Vor“i:^P^ci^* i"efn gi^^i^d^foT tS%re^n^rpTbSfl^d^n‘^Vn"d''s^%" ? ''Vt‘should be noted the lot was not located on a cul-de-sac. Lot Configuration In addition to the comments set forth June 13th per Section l°-f',„\“‘>/;/',|i:rguols' lands L'ove\he 5IS!f?'el"va\7on; So'use'’t^“\h/’^i™edia\e south on I.t 4 has Zoning File #1551 July 10, 1990 Page 2 been designated. The proposed house location for Lot 4 has been placed behind the average setback line determined at proposed house on Lot 3 and the existing house to the south. (Review Exhibit H.) Note the proposed house has been moved away from the southern lot line providing a greater buffer to existing development along the south. Note Lot 4's building envelope has been defined 26' from the 930 elevation of wetland. Access/Road Improvement Applicant has relocated road within existing dedicated right-of-way, applicant's property and southern portions of these properties to immediate north (review Exhibit L). Owners of 995,997 and 998 Wildhurst Drive have agreed to dedicate portions of their property up to northern edge of existing drive. Review Exhibit N. Applicant shows Wildhurst Trail extension as an urban section with a 28' finished paved width with curbs. In reviewing the most recent revised plan, the City Engineer has recommended that applicant approach the 3 property owners to the north as road will be placed at edge of newly defined southern boundary of northern lots and to request the granting of easements over existing sewer lines and for area for snow maintenance. Property owners should be advised that the area of the easements is not excluded from the buildable envelope areas. Upon Council approval of the preliminary plat, staff will ask for engineering plans for the urban section of road. Such plan shall locate each access drive to be served by proposed road. This will also include shared drive that serves the two homes east of cul-de-sac. Note applicant had proposed the road to the northern edges of the existing roadway along the portions of the property where there is a dedicated 60' right-of-way providing minimal impact upon the properties to the west. DrainageAfetlands/Grading Plan The wetland is now defined at the 930 elevation. Applicant has taken drainage collecting at the southwest edge of property via a storm sewer to the existing drainageway that drains to the wetlands. Drainage will no longer fan out along the shared lot line between Lot 4 and the most southern property. Surface run off will now be conveyed via the storm sewer to the wetlands just to the north of the building envelope of Lot 4. As requested, the applicant's revised plan shows drainage easements at a 15' minimum width. At the inlet to the lake, a baffle wier is to be installed for the purpose of skimming floatable material and preventing it from entering into the main lake. In addxtion, a catch basin (CB 2) at the northwest corner Zoning File #1551 July 10, 1990 Page 3 of the property shall be provided with a sump in order to remove large granular particles/sediment from surface run-off from roadway. Applicant will be filling portions of the flood plain as a result of the road construction. Subdivider may be asked to provide additional excavation to match fill placement within the flood plain within the road area. The excavation must be made below the 931.5 elevation. There is adequate area to meet this requirement if the Watershed District makes this a condition of approval of the plat. Applicant must provide an amendment to the grading plan if the Watershed District requires a matching excavation for fill placed within flood plain final grading plans ). Applicant has provided erosion control wherever land alterations are proposed as a result of residential construction or road construction. Options of Action Denial - If members seek to deny the proposed 4 lot plat, please refer to Section 11.02, Subdivision 10 for the necessary findings. Approval - Finding the subdivision has met all pertinent standards of the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City and grants a lot width variance to Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) based on the following hardship and finding; 1. Lots are located on a cul-de-sac. 2. To move cul-de-sac further east would remove 2 sets of mature pine trees and create a major impact closer to the lakeshore based on severe sloping topography. 3. Granting of lot width variance for lots on cul-de-sacs is consistent with previous City action. Approval of the subdivision is based on the following conditions ; 1. Final grading plans must specify the following information ; a) Allowed hardcover within 75-250' and 250-500' setback areas based on lot line configurations approved by Council. b) Based on MCWD's final directives, final grading plan to show excavation to replace areas filled by road construction. Zoning File #1551 July 10, 1990 Page 4 Isv Final plat to specify following: a) Easement area to be obtained from neighboring property owners to the north for utility and snow storage/maintenance purposes (5-10'). b) Provide 15' easement from 930 elevation leading to lalce at invert to wetlands. 2. City Engineer to review storm sewer plan for drainageway at southwest corner to determine if 24" CMP is adequate for watershed, etc. Applicant to provide engineering plans for road (urban section 28' paved width with curbs). 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits for new construction, the road base, all storm sewer construction and other required land alterations must be installed and approved by the City. It should be noted prior to any land alteration that all erosion control as shown on the approved grading plan must be installed. 4. The City Assessor shall be asked to determine the fair market value of the property. Applicant shall be asked to pay a park dedication fee at the rate of 8% of the fair market value of the property. The City Assessor shall be in contact with the developer prior to making final determination of the fair market value. All such park dedication fees shall be paid upon the filing of the final plat application. 5. Applicant to designate wetlands as drainage easements on the final plat and to grant flowage and conservation easement over the designated wetland area. 6. The property owners at 995, 997 and 999 Wildhurst Trail to be asked to grant utility and snow maintenance easements not to exceed 5-10' for areas adjacent to proposed road along north side. 7. Applicant is placed on notice that all entrance monuments in excess of 3 1/2 feet shall require variances. In addition, any filling to be done on sites that are not connected to the protection of the foundation or to providte positive drainage from residental structure will require conditional use permits if that fill is in excess of 100 cubic yards. If fill is under 100 cubic yards, a separate land alteration permit may be issued by the City. ^ I Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & I Associates Engineers & Architects Otro G Bofvsmxi PE PoDert W tosene. PE Joseph C Anc^ertiL P£ Marvin L Sorvaia PE RcharO E Turner. PE James c OJson. PE G»enn R Cook, PE Thomas E Ncjyes. PE Rooert G Schurvcnt PE Susan M Ebeftm. C PA Keth A Gordon. PE. Richard W Foster PE Donald C BurgarCL PE Jerry A BourtJon PE Marit A r^anson. PE Ted K PM PE Michaei T Rauimann. PE RtoOerr R Pfefflehe. PE Oavd O Losiuxa. PE Thomas W Pererscn, PE Wicnaci C Lyncn, PE Jamfi R MafarxJ. PE. kernetn P .ArxJcrson, PE. Martc R Rorfs. PE RCOertC Russek. AiA Thomas E Argus. PE Ho\^afO A Santord. PE. Daruei J Edgerxon, PE. Mart A Setx PE Phihp j CasweH. P£ fSThaei Ma.'iire/. PE .Mark O Wai/iV PE Thomas R Anoersoa AJA Gary F Ryiaoder PE. Miles ft Jensen. PE. L Phi!?ip Gravel PE. Rene C Piumart. AiA. Agnes M Rmg. A 1C P Jerry 0 Pertzsch. PE Cec.iKD O.'.v ef. PE Chanes A Enckson Leo M Pawersky Harlan M Oiscn June lA, 1990 City of Orono Box bS Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55232 Attn: Jeanne Mabusth Re: Vildhurst Estates Our File No. 139-1551 Dear Jeanne: We have reviewed the proposed Wildhurst Estates Development. There several issues that need to be addressed relative to the proposed plan. JUN 2 0 .q5S3 are The cul-de-sac at the end of Highview Lane should be moved 10 feet south of the location shown. We will need topography and contours to the north property line of Highview Lane. The developer should also provide a design profile for the street. We will need soil borings where Highview Lane crosses the low area. We would also recommend stabilization fabric in the low area. Storm sewer will be necessary in the future to pick up the drainage from Wildhurst Trail. Storm drainage easements should be provided across Lot A as shown. Drainage and utility easements should also be provided along all lot lines. A drainage and conservation easement should be provided over the wetland area. The developer should place a storm sever culvert from 10 feet south of the lift station to 10 feet north of the proposed driveway on Lot A. Construction of a drainage ditch to the north of the driveway will be necessary. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Glenn R. Conk GRC:dh End. grc/60 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 5SM3 • 612-636-4600 CITY OP OROMO P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 473-7357 55323 ZONING FILE #1551 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice; June 27, 1990 TO: Robert Waade 998 Wildhurst Trail Mound, MM 55364 COPIES TO: Bill Rudnicki W.R. EngelhardtAssociates, Inc 1107 Hazeltine Blvd., Suite 480 Chaska, MN 55318 TYPE OP APPLICATION: Preliminary Subdivision DATE OF MEETING: June 18, 1990 VOTE: 6 For 0 Against Planning Conniiission recomnends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Preliminary plan to be amended designating the following: a. b. c. d. e. f. Elevation of wetland areas at 930' elevation. Designate 15' wide drainage easements over drainageways leading from culverts along west side of plat. Designate storm sewer culvert from 10' south of lift station to 10' north of the proposed driveway on Lot 4 locate drainage ditch from north of driveway to wetland (option to connect with most southern drainageway defined at wildhurst Trail). Closest projection of house to the south of Lot 4 is to be shown in order to determine average lakeshore setback and placement of proposed house. Staff would also recommend that proposed house location be moved further north rather than placing house 10 from southern lot line. Position roadway along north border. Proposed road can only be placed within 60' right-of-way dedication along west side and 30' dedicated within eastern portions of the road. Note: Cul-de-sac must be located within portion of right-of-way and subject properties. Areas of lots to be recalculated. Such areas to be exclusive of realigned road, areas below the 929.4' elevation and the wetlands within Lots 3 and 4 at the 930' elevation. Area between 930* and 931.5' elevation to be designated as flood plain zone. Planning Conunission Notice June 27/ 1990 Page 2 2. 3. To submit thr .’.formation requested by the City Engineer in his report dated June 14/ 1990 already submitted to you at a recent meeting. Submittal of all information to be submitted to the Watershed District as set forth in the report dated June 15/ 1990. Please note the amended preliminary plan should locate the excavated area to compensate for fill placed within Lake Minnetonka flood plain. Grading plans should include erosion control and quality control structure at entrance to lake from wetland. As confirmed the conversation with Mr. Rudnicki/ staff will meet with you on Monday/ July 2, 1990 to provide additional information on watershed area that contributes run-off to the subject property. In order to assure scheduling on the Planning Commission agenda of July 16/ 1990/ the above information must be submitted to the City no later than July 6/ 1990. Isv DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY Date: For valuable consideration, («z^S DOfe.rlM_ _ _, grantors, hereby convey to the City of Orono, a municipal corporation, a right-of-way for the construction, use, general maintenance, and repair of Wildhurst Trail, across real property of the grantors located in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Said right-of-way shall be limited to a strip of land ^H-srr-rr-W) wid-^h extending North of their southern boundary line.'+® This right-of-way shall run with the property and shall be binding upon the grantors, their heirs, successors, and assigns. 5ignature : Pr inted: • • L -7' DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY Date:7/JTILV For valuable mns ■ rier a t i on . H. Ca/^nJ ., grantors, hereby convey to the City of Orono, a municipal corporation, a right-of-way for the construction, use, general maintenance, and repair of Wildhurst Trail, across real property of the grantors located in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Said right-of-way shall be limited to a strip of land thirty foot in -i-^ extending North^of their southern boundary 11 n e .-h* “tve. This right-of-way shVl I run with the property and shall be binding upon the grantors, their heirs, successors, and assigns. •7 Signature; Printed; /h 5 ''7. 7 4 ^ // U Z -3 DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY Date \niO '""O 'For valuable consideration, QaZ ^ hereby convey to the City of Orono, a right-of-way for the construction, use, repair of Wildhurst Trail, across real located in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Said right-of-way shall be limited to a strip of land t-h-rr ry (36-) ^ _t-n -wridth extending North of their southern boundary 1 i ne. +0 or -Me. CDciVfi/Vj ci»P i^TT^ 6*^ This right-of-way shall run with the property and shall be binding upon the grantors, their heirs, successors, and assigns. _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _, grantors, municipal corporation, a general maintenance, and preperty of the grantors Signature; Pr inted: Z=i \J) IV. 1" S i gnature: Printed: ♦! I I ♦ » .s At e^o TO * J7c7^ fJ A1.C/T^ o^ QfijatJo lfjlc,OtAr^ AV. e.udfOiC(c.{ .i i^AS£0 O/J Tf^ T / _ Jtr HAJC /^€t^>S^o Tf^ Zl^c.O/«/3//v<t6‘/ XT' 5(Mpu .c-C) . AJor^ Tf^'PT T^fi^EE NEtCfH-So^it uJ>€es: EAooiLASLE n> Tt^ p<£>^i£f3 PoAb J SuT OAJl^'^ OaJ CoAJo /T’/OaJ T(MT /r^ EOG€ UJ/UO SE -r^ S4m€T SOO£ OP TPEl Cu.<e^cBjTify itJpt^f\cE, Tfh\T ^Mou/ THE fmEflE*>T 5y fL&\y£, Tf^ DocuAAe^ns T^ A/SlOH&oies» Tf^iSi 6>ivEf^ Lss Th€ F^UiuifKiAfiji fzR. c^CifCAriot^ OF TP.AfC, T^ P/a/AC. PoC>^*^e?^TS IP(LL ACceAO^C^Tf&6 Ctry 5t7vv <qa>2/)s . At/J^ AO\//Sofi.\j /\jcrs^ VoiA-P, ^Qiyie£?^A^^Jii. C/^r~^ /Ajf you4^ A^OTfC4^ 27 fP, TF^'i U$7 ’^ /aa 'T?^E _S<^'HC' S^O^EajCE- f^eroA/uo €cs\/ oFf T^ Plat,............ 0, Syo\AJfJ cF^ TPT PEViSeZ> PPEUAA/AJ^*f Plat ................ jfi /l</ TCA^ $(^^S a so' £KrS^A$/Op 7T> rTE eX'i^T/AJC, ;:^ctc.u^r, A MA^PouE AAjP A\AJ AOO/r/OAJAL, fSO^ qT c/ap S'^-Th - ouffTp TPP OAJ\fAJfi{,€ c:M.uc>«Ster AjofLTp oP S/r«“. t^, SWow/J OfJ <JEV/S€D P cAaJ . X... A^ov^ep _THe ______ ;; UOCATVcnJ No^TH _ . - ___eECo»y^^&^ei> 6^ , ST7\PP » .^. TMC F\A7Zfi7.t ry of /IjCftAr' lOA^ o/^ TPE~.. ': iPiujHuP-yr p^Peir^ , THT T*^^oeS AfEio^/SpA^ Tb |;7/ir'g' NOiirff C^fuPN Pi&Pt cP $' 7P * I ^ t« 1 » f*. Lor^ M-anj C B est O ^Calodlatie ?^ . /\ll uors (v\^er rJfc’ Ucrr Nt^C> SUJuD»ASL(S; C-P-;re^A. tc?T / ^ -2- ., ........... i.Do NOT., u5» &TH- va ^an 66'. JT Sei-»e\/€..!_ I !$► Sr/O- ACCgf>rA6L«5' IT |S A Ci/^u DE" SAC- ______ I Lot u ^h -iC h - ui^^ A<^ 0-3 tTH. Lv i(=vs:v>3i<i,€^ Tj»-g ’ ^ucd € Sac ..................EXT^^ioi*^ To gAVf Rsvoo£ -nco «,crr=» of PifOC’ .-pCiSS^ A^C> T»-^ SUoAS <l-otO^T(e.'-3Cr/cO PAAt-T/c6’3 oooo^»^X> feS" JV\C^R;f T5\ ffi Cu-UT, Ofj &gUlSCC> PcAT A.c-'-^irS p-e^crv-4" ‘TT^ja- coU -J ,s — Uv<>A /vv.oo-ej[ OA f^vjlse^d pVfcf U-?€. Uo-v>6_p ro>^»<x(i J^i-h'ono-l •U> po Vo -H*-J_ p\ O r Vvi \» a C- C4w (Co-\CV\ HiT* ii_ ^ t^'^) 1 ^ f p(«-V" ^ «A^i«4Ae "tv^a^4'■f c.»^il| Ice, rec^vj'./eA. f^r 4xa, . COAS'VroC,4l p\cKM^».0-3C oJO^lci -hx-\M:- Sto^vo,\ L30f;«>> ^ OQ^c--k-Soi 1 Covrdi' -HsVvS 1 . ^ d oyC'f’ uOdJUrP ..•Vt? ‘\3LVe- <U>t^ o|<^-h I ij ^cc1 epicj bu|+lui_ jr 6Ao^«ok» 3, (a JolWsw J T>»'S^.'c+ CoA-»TjtOC_ AC>C>^ S>«)W-T0 I «^vWA^P AXiOB? CATOf -JO Tv^4" «gU(sEp PLAjO AS r f I f • • • • I . I • 1; i: CUu’-'eXT 5AS//4 ^2-, I m •5: To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: July 11, 1990 *1*553 Mike Pierce, 480 Deborah Drive Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-IA Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (C) - Driveway monuments exceed allowed height of 3>j' requiring the following variances: Height - Allowed = Proposed Variance 3%' = 7' = 3H' or 100% Street Setback Required = Proposed = Variance = 100' 2' 98' Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (B) lighting. Required = 5' Proposed = 4' Variance = 1' or 20% - Setback required for List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Application - Property Owners List - Plat Map - Applicant's Addendum Date Plan/Elevations - Survey Review of Application - The applicant proposes the installation of driveway monuments and electric gates at the entrance to the property at Deborah Drive. In addition, the applicant proposes 3' high fencing of the 16 acre homestead to maintain horses and llamas on property. Zoning File #1553 July 11, 1990 Page 2 of 2 The required opening excluding the gate portion of the structure at the proposed setback must be at a minimum of 16 based on width of fire emergency vehicles. The fire chief of Long Lake has advised that if entrance monuments with gates are setback 20' off right-of-way, that opening could be allowed at 14'. As gates will be electrically controlled, the emergency agencies ask that a lock box (knox box) be provided for ease of access by emergency vehicles. Manual override instructions in case of power failure should be posted inside lock box. Maximum height of the entrance monuments is 7'. Interior pillars will hold the lighting fixtures set 4' off the right-of-way of Deborah Drive. The ordinances require a minimum of 5' setback. Options of Action - 1. Denial. If denied, please refer to th 3 necessary findings set forth in Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A). Applicant may be advised that entrance monuments and gates may be at an allowed 3%' height, but that if lighting is to be used on the entrance monuments, that the monuments must be set back 5' from the right-of-way; or 2.Approval. To approve variances to Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (B) & (C) granting height and setback variances for the proposed entry monuments (maximum height of entrance monuments = 7', height of gate = 6^' measured from existing grade), based on the following findings; 1. Entry monuments provide no hazards to the users of the private road, Deborah Drive. 2. The City has received no negative comments from the neighbors notified for this variance review. 3. Applicant claims gates will be used to contain ani..ials on private property. Approval is subject to the follow conditions; 1. Opening at entrance excluding area of gates must be at a minimum 16' width. 2. Lock box (knox box) must be installed at entrance for use of emergency agencies. Manual override instructions to be posted inside lock box. 3. Pillar to retain lighting must be moved 5' from the street lot line of the subject property. Applicant is further advised that lighting must be shielded downward or at a dim density so as not to create a hazard for the users of the adjacent roadway. HARDSHIPDescribe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; - - - --- - - - — DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ ___ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 2! Certified Property^ Owner^ List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). i 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. , 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. , 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour variance application is not_completg——the— information tms not been included* _ Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _—_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE • ^ The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant ®^P®*?®®® incurred in review of this applipt<ion, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature V\a /^ ------------------------ Date ^ ^ ^IJf^tne^r'TJJir^y ackowledges and agrees to this authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants^ agents. Commission members,rand Council members for purposes of inves ga- tion and verification of thiss i^equest. Owner's Signature -- --—_ _ _ _ _ _— Date __S- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on t^e third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ^ ! 5-^'3 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATIONi Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional varianc Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) t Y nc orm OFFICE I "n jAAnM a«./w \/>^ v'w vv mz-!:rcTor-ruAui(^ TTXUVi./V Lw^ nvi06/^'^'Vi/ PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ^80 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) V — \ \ ^o O C? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Pintle Phone (home) Phone (work) 9LOO Address:City;Zip:^ll2 OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address:City:.Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property / I- I Residential Other (specify) oO DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST % Describe request in detail; Estimated Construction Cost $ ^ ^^ Oo o , VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) Other •! J N4 RUN DATE 06/25/90 BATCH 002 HEWEPIM COUT4TY PROPERTY INFORriATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OVIMERS LIST PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 31-118-23 23 000^ 00^75 DEBORAH DR J 6 WAIGHT & K M SHEETMAN JAMES G WAIGHT ^75 DEBORAH DRIVE MAPLE PLAIN M^4 55359 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 31-118-23 23 0008 00^50 DEBORAH DR RAG BIESTERFELO R C A G D BIESTERFELO 450 DEBORAH DR MAPLE PLAIN m 55359 PROP ADDR 0WT4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 70 36-118-24 14 0003 00070 ADDRESS UrMSSIGr4ED DAVID LEE SCHLOSSER DAVID L SCHLOSSER 510 DEBORAH DRIVE SO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 PROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR TOTAL BATCH 002 00009 crvcF T.C*.0 JUN 2 1 1990 M •*». 38 31-118-23 25 0006 00510 DEBORAH OR H HEGGELMAM < J H HEGGELHAN HILLIAM S JOHANtlA HEGGEUtAN 510 DEBORAH DRIVE SO MAPLE PLAIt4 rVJ 55359 38 31-118-23 23 0009 00920 DEBORAH DR R W BRADY JR < R F BRADY ROBERT S RACHAELLE BRADY JR 920 DEBORAH DRIVE MAPLE PLAIN HN 55559 70 36-118-29 19 0009 00070 ADDRESS Ut<ASSIGNEO MICHAEL B PIERCE MICHAEL B PIERCE 19895 19IH AVE NO PLYliOUni MN 55997 REPORT NO. P1935901 PAGE 3 38 31-118-23 23 0007 00980 DEBORAH OR MICHAEL B PIERCE MICHAEL B PIERCE 980 DEBORAH DR MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 31-118-23 23 0010 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED MCCULLEY FARM HOMEONNERS ASS MCCULLEY FARM HOMEOEMERS ASS 915 DEBORAH DR MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 70 36-118-24 14 0005 00450 DEBORAH DR ROBERT S GRETCHEN BIESTERFELO RCDERT/GRETCHEN BIESfERFELD 450 DEBORAH DRIVE MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 Zj\ CJl 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORtlATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HtT«4i;PIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATIOT4, TO THE BEST OF MY KMOHLEDCE AMD BELIEF DATE j: t r 1: V* t. #• • %• >5? • ••• •• ••■ AC ••• • ••• •• • • «•• ^ .t A V A 1 f«9*ld ‘90*C l3^|.49 *w.v / / / •3iLi5 ••^1* 'a •-••L *K*7VyVt y«1 9 •y«» •* • • • • •D ©• -BECT PRODUCTS, INC. 5 Medicine Lake Road • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55427 U.S.A.Area Code 612-542-9200 Toll Free 800-328-5702 FAX 612-542-9205 May 30f 1990 Dear Orono Planning Commissioners:#1 ‘O I am requesting city approval for the installation of driveway monuments and electric gates as per the plan submitted. The location as shown on the survey will be on my lot and not on the plotted roadway of Deborah Drive, which is a private road. We plan to enclose our sixteen acres with a three foot fence so as to keep our horses and llamas on our property. Your approval^f this request will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, jfw\ ^ Michael B. Pierce 480 Deborah Drive Orono, MN 55359 'JUH %isao MANUFACTURERS OF QUALITY PRODUCTS SINCE 1957 , < 1 • • • • %’ * • • I • •* • i .* '•.'I • • * • . to ^ , • to ■“ .» •• • • •* I• * • . •. *•« »' • -wTO’-V;.:..* -.••to 1. «>4. •% .‘ t » • , • -.1 • • • - to,^ m» ’ .'f »/ to* * ^ ^ p ■ k... * • To:Planning Conunission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: July 1, 1990 #1554 Timothy R. Gramentz, 4680 North Arm Drive Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-IB, Single family rural residential, 2 acre, unsewered Application - Request for side setback variance to construct second story over existing garage. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E -- Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Pertinent Facts - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Letter of Request & Hardship/Description of Unusual Property Conditions Neighboring Property Acknowledgements Survey House Plans 1. Required side setback = 30' Proposed side setback = 19.3' 2. Applicant's residence was destroyed by fire in February. Applicant is requesting to rebuild on the same foundation, with the same footprint, and generally replacing the house in kind. The need for the variance stems from the fact that the one significant revision from the pre-existing house, will be the second story over the garage area, which was not consumed by the fire. Discussion - The applicant's architect apparently had no contact with the City until the plans were completed, and applicant was not aware of the need for a variance until he applied for a permit. The existing attached garage is 19.3' from the side lot line. The nearest adjacent residence structure to the east is 200' distant. Constructing above the garage will have no impact in increasing visual density of the neighborhood and will probably not be a noticable change to the property. Zoning Pile #1554 July 7r 1990 Page 2 of 2 The existing lot is 0.89 acres in area, and 140' in width. The property is served by a septic system which was upgraded approximately 3 years ago. Staff has had in-house discussions regarding whether or not a lot area and width variance is technically needed in this situation. The applicant's insurance company would not pay for a new foundation, finding that the existing foundation was substantially intact and reuseable. If the foundation without the upper floors constitutes an existing structure, then it would not seem technically necessary to grant the lot area and width variances. The zoning code does not specify for conforming uses, the degree of destruction of a structure which changes its legally existing status. Such provisions are only defined for non-conforming uses (i.e. commercial uses in residential zone, for instance). Staff Recommendation - Given no apparent detrimental impact to the neighborhood, and finding that the property has contained a single family residence for many years, staff would recommend approval of the side setback variance to allow construction above the existing garage. r a ? CITY OF ORONO ~ VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) MM mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm * • mm mm ^m mm mm M PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 4680 NORTH ARM DRIVE_______________ f5 !•?^.1 - V. m " ") Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 06- l17-23?.3-000b CITY OF 0,WrrviAia'r riccjrc ..... w-i * iui. A VV'WV I# ft Oi ^ lU-QSiC,^lK 71 i /S. w U1unC‘0t» ffXU'VUUV UV'V'Ji I Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name TIMOTHY R. GRAMENTZ Phone (home) 472-5578 Phone (worJc) 472-5578 Address: 4680 NORTH ARM DRIVE City: MOUNU’^ORONO Zip! S5364 OWNER (if different than applicant) Name SEE ABOVE _ _ _ _ __ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired {month/year) I Iso own the adjacent parcels of land. PRF.' *JNT DSB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property CITY TO COMPLETE SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $121,000.00 Describe request in detail: REBUILD MODIFICATION, CITY HAS DETERMINED IT DOES NOT MEET CURRENT Sbl-UACK REQUIREMENTS.,-------- VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setbac)c Variances ( Other Lot Width Pront Hardcover ★★★★★★ Side Rear) HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; SEE ATTACHMENT_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _— DESCRIPTION OP DNDSDAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _SEE ATTACHMENT_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ 2. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 'Z" Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list).'^ Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required, Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. SJcetches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application^ please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owne/ must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above infonnatlon has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete Initialed by Clerical Staff;________________________________ Date_________________ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the infoirmation supplied is true and correct thA.best of jl^is/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature L Date TIMOTHY R. GRAMENTZ OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of tl)i^ request. Owner's Signature Date C. _ _ _ _ _ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present ’t all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Cornmission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please maJce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building S Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. \ I ■ H {S' t' * % ». • I* iv • V. RUN DATE 06/11/90 BATCH 007 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPER IY OWriERS LIST PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR S8 06-117-aS 23 0002 04620 NORTH ARM DR H D A A H H WINTER DON A WINTER 4620 NO ARM DR NEST MOUND MN 55364 PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 36 06-117-23 23 0007 04700 NORTH ARM DR H R 4 0 MAIJALA RAYMOND G 4 DOROTHY MAIJALA 4700 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 55364 HI PROP AuuK ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR TOTAL BATCH 007 00006 m 3 a* REPORT NO. PI43S401 PAGE 17 38 06-117-23 23 0005 04640 NORTH ARM DR W DAL IVERSON DANIEL A LINDA IVERSON 4640 NORTH ARM OR MOm<D MN 55364 U7y- "/i'SL- 38 06-117-23 2i 0006 04680 LK)RTH ARM DR H TIMOTHY R GRAMENTZ TIMOTHY R GRAMENTZ 4680 NORTH ARM DR W MOUND lUi 55364 L' - . . V A’ 38 06-117-23 23 0015 00C38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO JOANN M GRIMES JOAttI M CRIMES 4720 NORTH ARM OR W MOUt40 MT4 55364 38 06-117-23 52 0002 00405 NORTH ARM DR LAKEVIEW GOLF OF MTKA INC LAKEVIEW GOLF OF MTKA INC 855 RED OAK LANE MOUTTD MT4 55364 o i (C / • J ’ J7^f-/G>c> I L( 7..>V 7 \ I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPI4EGENTATION OF I44FORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEffl4CPIN COUt4TY DEPARrMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY Kf40WLEDGE AND BELIEF. ^. / a DATE */7 BY nirnrilMi V iI JJL tt ^ ^ lARDSHIP & DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS: L i c V'' i 4680 NORTH ARM DRIVE )N JANUARY 21, 1990 MY HOME WAS DESTROYED BY FIRE. EVERYTHING WAS A TOTAL LOSS lOWEVER, THE BLOCK FOUNDATION WAS SALVAGABLE. DUE TO THIS MY INSURANCE :OMPANY DID NOT REIMBURSE ME FOR THE REBUILDING OF THE BASEMENT FOUNDATION. AM REQUESTING This> VARIANCE BECAUSE I WANT TO REBUILD MY HOME ON THE iXISTING BLOCK STRUCTURE THAT WILL ALLOW ME TO MINIMIZE ANY ADDITIONAL LOSSES, JY DESIGNING A HOME THAT FITS OVER THE EXISTING BLOCK STRUCTURE. UPON ENQUIRING ABOUT THE BUILDING PERMIT THEY SAID THAT THE EXISTING STRUCTURE DID lOT MEET THE REQUIRED SET-BACKS NECESSARY BY APPROXIMENTLY 13 FEET. THEREFORE, I AM REQUESTING THIS VARIANCE DUE TO THE UNUSUAL PREDICAMENT THIS IAS PUT IN ME IN. I FEEL THIS WILL IN NO WAY BE A DETRIMENT TO THE lEIGHBORHOOD OR COMMUNITY AND WILL ONLY ENHANCE THE VALUES OF THE SURROUNDING ►roperty owners and will also allow me to begin putting my life back together IGAIN. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION IN THIS MATTER. / TIMOTHY R. GRAMENTZ r TL y ■ r 1 Adjacent Property /i^ers'^aclcnowledaement Fonun J I (we)TV^pQ.—i p^int name (s}. \ \ M P So hJ T INM aI.AQtTLPis^. print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at //. QfL.U), also referred to as Land Use Application No. —* I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the. improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City this Land use Application, please submit your comments Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting da . Adjacent Property Oiraers* Acknowledgement Porm I (we) of aJ. [print name(s)J [print address I have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at dJ^.Uj-also referred to as Land Use Application No. __ _ _• I (we) understand that in executing this ac)cnowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. ;$/- 90 Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City this Land use Application, please submit your comments * Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. #15R4 • • j^jacBnt Property Oinieirs* Ac/inowXedgcBieiit Fonn I ,„e) 00.V i' . of(print nameTTn [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at A ^- also referred to as Land U: e Application No I (we) understand that in executing this aOcnowledgement, I (we) am (are) not aslted to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. 0 i 1 CV-; Date Date If you have any infoi^ation that may assist the #1554 /* o 4 M # T f -*-7 <t Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgenent Fora y' yf) ____^ I (we) [print name(s)J o-[ J I ITICA 9''Of //oC ./t/. ASiM tiJL. [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at aJ. ---- also referred to as Land Use Application No. _____• I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use / '7 Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the ^ Building & this Land use Application, please submit your comments to the Building 6 Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. #1 C 54 r“, , ■» /:/}/) VI r".V7 Z, Ay 7 7 - • • I (we) Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement Form /V[AtTALA of [print name(s)J [print address! have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at u; . _ also referred to as Land Use Application Ko. « I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. rop^ty Owner Date nLJj//ru! Property OWner/ v Date :l/'7 ---------^ ---------- If you have any information that may assist the City this Land use Application, please submit your comments to the Building s Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. #1554 .. ....-..I - •« > • • . • J •J "H ♦ ‘ ♦ • • . -.r,t • •*o- ’, •;’.**** .• ;* Z • .** /'*••• • * « ] I . 4* V *. .* ..•. •• •• • < .• • '• !v - r* • . *, » w >: - • •• •. I • Ji • •.. V*; .'• i ,■ ’ ‘ *. ‘.,-.: -VArv-.t.:; : **: X * •. **... i\ . • • • •. ■• • * '» t •. ••' • jifr •' * • * . - « • • « t • • • • • * I ♦ * • tJ ■• •• •* ^ \, • ; . • ■ '*• — .# * * f * ; • • I • t* ■ ’ ' ' • ' f •• »4 f **- -•,•••■ • • . • * t i I*. ‘ ‘ • •■•»#. , • t I * -1 ) ' ■ ■ ' ‘ - A ■ ' . - ;• j • • *•* « *• '■ •■ ,^*m. ^ • * » I •#lo64 J 1 ^ ./ • i .■'D'.;Q>'D; ■■ ■:: is'jy •tS AcM.r«-.‘ ^*1 Ug-PT T-^j6.vArrvoU ’« * \ '•o'' I. • . " I •_ .*4 *., • . • r ;• • ♦ r.. ’• . f • •• . t . . f . I ovi ^&>* ♦ \ *«a ‘ . , *; i. 4*^ f • .' * •■ « • « j•»■•,. *,• ■■-*.«'. * • ' *. * ' I . » . . *. ti*'..* . ’ . . :, •,.- ♦ . ... . : . . • . A • ■.: -.r - t"T^rx —“-t -i*.T * ......XU --------'-j *—r----1-------------»r t » — r I • » I------ -.................-vj r .------ 2 !• *- ^ 1*3 f«iCX4 • Mt,. "■ ' :_• i .tnri, ' ■.. •,. i .... j .. ^5{|!.L'fsSilSairv ., 4.^. i A'* •-------- —4. Hip^i s:’%3SBS‘. ‘.ssssiss: *■ I x-cnrxr .... ^tMi la ^ ••s ^Aii sllli: r» / I .'•4 -J-bJ -------- .‘P *cvR?55? ——- ^;r H ■ f* f. ) xif '—----------- 1 - . V 't V <^.“v cf^nnmxrjnr:^^iWiH:cGc:[-i~:ix]rxr vIllXjEECCIIXlII ZL>srr;iEr:[zr:i-jr: ::3g ■ 4 v «aiiq EM: nncnncz!cnaciED i«l cnsoE noEEj fr i > ••• v./;v: ;;-f’.\.‘.;V -;4i iiaii • ■* • • • .»— ^ > AO- ♦ -,'i' ;•4*v*tcr £>l* '4.. tJ ’7»" < -■ V » 7 To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:July 9, 1990 Subject: #1556 Mr. & Mrs. Gerald Nelson. 1629 Bohn's Point Road Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IB, Single family lakeshore residential, 1 acre, sewered Application - Request for hardcover variance to construct room addition over existing grade level hardcover area List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Hardcover Calculations Construction Plans Resolutions #1726 and #2534 Pertinent Facts - 1. Allowed 75-250' hardcover (per Resolution #1726): 4725 s.f.*. 2. Existing 75-250' hardcover as of June 1990: 5776 s.f.* 3.Applicant is requesting to enclose an existing alcove area on the north side of the house, which currently is hardcover (concrete slab) but which was not originally approved as hardcover. 4.The proposed construction meets all required setbacks, and will have no visual impact in the neighborhood. ♦Additional 900 s.f. sand-bedded deck was allowed as non-hardcover per Resolution #1726, and does not appear in these calculations. Discussion The proposed addition is minor in scope relative to the existing house, and will probably not be visibly noticeable by anyone except the adjacent neighbor. However, absent the visual impact, the proposal does increase the amount of structural hardcover on the property and review of the request has found existing hardcover is significantly in excess of that approved in Resolution #1726. Zoning File #1556 July 9, 1990 Page 2 In 1984, the builder of this residence. Bill Krutzig, was granted a building permit to construct a house with a minimal driveway, and he immediately applied for variances to construct sidewalks, decks, and a larger driveway. The result of that application was to allow only the 25% standard hardcover, but in addition allowed a 900 s.f. deck constructed over a sand base with specified plank spacing, so that that deck would not be considered hardcover. There were perhaps a handful of similar applications for decks approved by the Council as "non-hardcover" in early 1985, a practice which did not continue. Disregarding the deck, existing hardcover within driveway, sidewalks, etc., is approximately 1,051 s.f. in excess of that which was approved. It is likely that the hardcover additions were not verified upon completion of the house, and the various hardcover items contributing to the excess probably occurred over a three year period while the house was being constructed. The current owners purchased this house in June 1987. Inspection records do not confirm when the driveway or sidewalks were installed, and those items do not require permits, hence the City's actual ability to monitor hardcover increases on a given property is very limited. Staff Recommendation The following issues should be addressed by Planning Commission: 1. Will the proposed addition be approved? 2. Should the City require any concurrent reductions to hardcover, i.e. reduce driveway, sidewalks, etc.? It appears that both sidewalk areas and driveway were constructed wider than proposed by the builder. Isv 4' Qjyy OP ORONO "■ VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175 ►OO ' m ($50.00 per each additional variance; Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 . 1- (no change from original After-the-Fact Fees (Double ^pplication^fee)_ _ PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address / < <2jg_ property Identification Humber (P.I.D.) t7 ;) ^^3' It-coos' CITY Of QfOHQ *t?r/rTD'/t vuAiii^' J’VflT'' rrA w'i I owi rtv'l. / i-'i/i y/ Attach legal description to application if n required survey. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - -—- Phone (home) - - APPLICANT Name CEZf^!^ K)£L^0^. Phone (work) S^JH OWNER Address, IA3‘i ~ (if different than applicant) Phone (home)^------------------------— S fit Kv\<L______________________Name Phone (work) City;Zip; {month/year) Address: __ _ _ _ _ ___ _ ___ _ _ _ Date Property Acquired - -h - - - - I (fl) (<io not) also own the adjacent _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Z.R Residential Other (specify) Estimated Construction Cost $ 3^^So*q o DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST ' i \j describe pgues^t _ _ _—-^'-^^^■fC^“Wf~c37rckefZ ^otsa/ot /A/Cf^e^t rA«. AmauMT: VARIANCES REQUIRED « F Ha-P-^Coveoa/ Lot Width Hardcover Side _ _ _ Rear) Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other __ _ _ _ _ _ __ Front HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; hxjui % JxXJht. DESCRIPTION OP DNUSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning^ Code Requirements; <rf^ ijuyuxjJkjASt t'jl.MJijcX i>vx cl ^»ax | exy\jL^ ,___________________________________ 4. RSpDIRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. , - Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 7^ 8. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete Initialed by Clerical Staff _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature • Date ^"JJ c ONNBRS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this * squest. Owner's Signature Date /Z . /^9/i '- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Applicant must have aTl submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. I 1 i I I ) * I i.* •X r. •• I' RUN DATE 06/13/90 BATCH 001 HENNEPIN COUV4TY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY »t4ERS LIST PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR CM4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR X* SB OB-117-23 A4 0015 01595 BOHNS POINT RD C J A S L HINSLOH CLARK J A SHARON J HINSLOH 1595 BOHNS POINT RD HAYZATA m 55391 38 17-117-23 11 0005 01629 BOHNS POINT RD G R NELSON ABA NELSON GERALD R A BARBARA A NELSON 1629 BOHN'S POINT ROAD HAYZATA m 55391 38 17-117-23 11 0008 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED J H DAYTON A E J DAYTON JUDSON N DAYTON 1655 BOHN'S POINT ROAD HAYZATA MN 55391 REPORT NO. P1^35<^01 PAGE 1 38 17-117-23 11 0003 01625 BOHNS POINT RO THE BANK HAYZATA TRUSTEE THE BANK HAYZATA TRUSTEE C J HINSLOH RETIREMENT TRUST 900 E HAYZATA BLVD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 11 0004 00036 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED DAS ANDERSON ET AL DAVID A MARGENE FOX 1645 BOHNS PT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 11 0006 01635 BOHNS POINT RD DOUGLAS H LOHMAR A HIFE DOUGLAS H LOHMAR 1635 BOHNS PT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 11 0007 01645 BOHNS POINT RD D A N FOX DAVID K A MARGENE FOX 1645 BOHNS POINT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 TOTAL BATCH 001 00007 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE >4 THE RECORDS OF THE HEH4EPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATIOlw TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEOGE AND BELIEF. DATE |nmr^ r s Oi 0 l!i_ __ _ ^o/aj7- ^ Jj^/oe /^?0 7S■-^OT ' UTTAjLeru ^ /S^'JOO 7*. HA^co'je^- __________^J/^uw-s/^^^^i/eyjA^y4?T^* (^^ZoL. ^ l’?2~C^ 31^0 c.rC. Tyt^" c V7z^ ' .r >«.; I ^ zs% I)erC)<^ COf K'l^a^ Az )i/t^^cs\tBit. AT' TJf^. ey/z.ryAjC^ /r^r OFFt^lO 53 ta'^/ 6x"^ /l^^^’>'<5^, ^J‘ Z<te (fO € Sm'/*t''^^7 /^o-r WAi-vc. P(LLFaC 3^:TD r.-^, f S . 7^ HD 33 2D 1^1^ .. (_fU»AS ’/0OM-M*V?D>C0Vet2-” c>^cic. . OF /H:r(!LoX. 9oO ,s:^. ^.....- _S^FfTI. ^ s :C-. ____ w \ • • •* I . • •••• • * • •• ' ^ -V... • 1 ■ V • • • * I..—•—.*.-r - * • * V ■ • 3^ iN. !Q f .o_-3^7 0 > I. ir a' v>* • ■ ^ * %' • V 4 ^• t •■■ I-- 4 f CITY OP I ORONO CITY City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CIT^^OUNCIL NO. 1726 , Iffil . TWsfidA’^SienA RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 FILE NO. 881 WHEREAS, Krutzig Custom Homes, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, (hereinafter "the Applicant") is owner of the property located at 1629 Bohn's Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows; Tract A, Registered Land Survey Mo. 565, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "Property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2, to permit the construction of declcs, sidewallc, and driveway which would increase the hardcover from 3,950 square feet or 21% to 5,950 square feet or 31.5% in the 75' to 250' setbaclc zone where only 25% or 4,725 square feet of hardcover is allowed; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the owner and effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota, hereby denies the application of Krutzig Custom Homes, Inc. for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 for the property legally described above, based on one or more of the following findings: 1. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on November 19, 1984 and recommended denial of the application based on the following findings: a) Applicant was made fully aware by City staff of the hardcover limitations on the property at the time of application for a building permit. b) The lot is substandard in area and width in the LR- IB Zoning District in which it is located; however, the property is substantially large enough that it could be developed within the hardcover limitations. c) The additional hardcover requested is not necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the owner, and the conditions leading to the need for a variance were created by the applicant. page 1 of 4 • t CITY OF ORONO:> city of OROlSry®’ ,ff' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI'l ^ NO.1726 d) The property currently accepts the natural flow of runoff from the surrounding properties and additional hardcover will decrease its capacity for accepting this flow. 2. The Council finds that the proposed deck design, which includes 5-1/2 inch decking with 1/2-inch spacing, underlain by a level sand absorbtion layer of 12” thickness, with no barrier layer between the sand and tlie underlying ground surface, has been demonstrated by applicant to be sufficiently permeable in this instance so as to not be considered hardcover. 3. The Council finds no undue hardships to the property that justify granting a variance to the hardcover limitation of 4,725 square feet in the 75-250' setback zone. FURTHERMORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono hereby approves the construction of deck, sidewalk, and driveway improvements to the property subject to the following conditions; 1. A permit for the proposed deck of 900 square feet in area must be obtained prior to construction. The deck must meet the following minimum design requirements: a) Width of decking boards may range from no less than 4" to no more than 8" in width. b) Ratio of board width to spacing width may be no greater than 12:1 (8.33% open space). c) A 1/2-inch high wood strip must be installed along the upper perimeter of the deck to prevent direct runoff. d) A minimum of a 12-inch deptn of sand must be placed under the entire area of the deck and extending downward through any fill layers to the original soil surface. e) The deck platform shall be no higher than 12” above finished grade, or if it is higher, a suitable barrier must be placed between the deck and the ground surface to prevent any access which would allow future place ment of impermeable materials (plastic, co.icrete slab, etc.) under the deck. page 2 of 4 •I CITY OF ORONO City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL l NO.1726 - ..vJ' ■* ■ 1 *<... .. .1 ■/ j i>;.,ir..:ty 2. The applicant is placed on notice that the deck and the areas above and below it may never be covered with impervious materials, enclosed, or in any way altered so as to become hardcover, without the granting of a hardcover variance by this or a future City Council. 3. The sidewalk and driveway are limited in hardcover to a total of 775 square feet, and any porous pavement or other innovative surfacing methods proposed to be used in order to exceed this amount are subject to review by the City. 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in tha chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council on this 11th day of February, 1985. ATTEST: page 3 of f • ' ih S ^ - V .-• Vi •».;*» •'• • ;•. /•■> '.: >:5.‘ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. , 1985 , before me a NotaryOn this / _day of _ _ Public withTn and for safd County, personally appeared /AJiL-LIA_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed* the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed che same as his (their) free act and deed. II Hin MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS . COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this dayof_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, 1985 , before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared _ _ _ _ _ _ known to me to Detheperson(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES « p •A • .. ’ V’ yV-' t-; STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) CITY OF ORONO ) I Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk ol' the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Orono with the original record of such resolution in the Minutes of the proceedings of said City Council at a meeting of said City Council held on _ _ _February 11_ _ _ _ _, 19 85_, and that the same is a true and correct copy of said resolution was duly adopted by said City Council at said meeting. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 1st . daV oI (SEAL) This document is being recorded for the benefit of the City of Orono per Minnesota Statutes 386.77. Thomas J. Radio, City Attorney State Deed Tax Due Hereon: Exempt This instrument was drafted by: Ci'ly of Orono l*,C. Dox 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 HtNNEPIH COUNTY. MINNESOTA I % > S a K \ N4 CALCUiAr/ajs/s A, / r^TAi AACA m /: AAAAAfCA A^AAPC a ^AA • 0 Sf.Af. B. 7f'-2S0*2AAf€ /. r^rAi. AA€A 9 /B^fCOtSf,Af, /. BAAA0H0 AfAAB€0k^€A A Af00rt 9 S8S^:ff,B^A. S, • icooi jp.A¥. c. 1 /A0 t fj. rf. T. ?5c*t 799/C / /.V.#: A7£4 B JYS0 i Tf.rA. ^r2^:^ccrt-L coyAnciL I9&.-> HvLU TO ‘/vas" Date : January 9, 1985 Scale: \" « 30’ 0 : Iron marker COFFIN t GRONQERG. INC. Engineers anj Land Surveyers long Lake. MlnnusoM • • City of OROIVO CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2534 ________ r^V'V tP \ P'A RESOLUTION GRANl-NG AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 AND AN AFTER-THE-FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 FILE #1309 WHEREAS, Gerald Nelson, (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 1629 Bohn's Point Road within the Ci^y of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Tract A, Registered Land Survey #565, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono to allow a pond of aDoroximately 165 s.f. constructed without the necessary permit review, located within the la)ceshore protected apa, and within the floor plain of La)ce Minnetonka where no such alteration is allowed per Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8, and in addition, seeks a conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 required for the installation of a pond. Minnesota; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1309. 2 The property is located in the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 1 acre in area per residential unit. 3, The property is approximately .8 acres in area. 4, The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on August 15, 1988 and October 17, 1988, and recommended approval of the after- the-fact variances and conditional use permit as set forth a ove, based on the following findings: Page 1 of 4 I city of ORONO CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION oF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2534 A) The improvement as amended by the Planning Commission will provide the least impact on the adjacent lake and within the flood plain of Lake Minnetonka. nl The excavation of the pond has been equalised by the placeJ^nt of the excavated fill within the flood plain ««a and has been found to have no negative impact on the flood plain o. Lake Minnetonka nor on the adjacent properties. C) The property receives the majority of run-off from the adjacent properties located within the immediate watershed. time of development of this property. 5 The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this Pi’O” p;rty are pLul^ar to it and do not apply generally to other Property in thiTzoning district, that granting the variance "ot adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not “ convenience to the applicant, but is »“®''^*?®bltantiristrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6 The Citv Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to ai a 165 s?f. retention pond^s amended by the ^i^y will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general °|‘^®P“^iherwould not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it property values and that the proposed level of PA^^Code will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of h 9 and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLOSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, 5 22^ Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code { Subdivision 2, and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 and grants a use permit per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to allow the ^®^®"^a°” A ^ak- reLin within 75' of the lakeshore and within ^^e flood plain^ Minnetonka where no such excavations are allowed, subject to t conditions: _ _ .Page 2 of 4 • • • * , •. r» I " '-"i I IraRONcy City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.2534 installed. 2 New plantings within lakeshore yard may remain as long as underlying geotechnic or filter fabric is removed. Wood pulp/chxps or crushed rock may remain as long as they are installed on top of existing or natural grade. 3 Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property^not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercisea by applicant completing the directives set forth a this lakeshore yard by November 15, 1988 or the special condition rssolution will expir© on that data. 4 Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and condi tions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned applicant has «ad, understood and hereby «9fees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself , ' successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. 1988. ATTEST I Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 24th day of October, yOolrothy M^allin, City Clerk Jamete R. Grabek, Mayor Property Owner ("s) M ^1 Page 3 of 4 To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From Date: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator July 10, 1990 Subject: #1557 Mike Cullen, 2700 Pheasant Road - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IB, Single family lakeshore residential, 1 acre, sewered Application - Request for hardcover and average setback variances to construct pool and associated patios on lakeside of house. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - Pertinent Facts - Application Letter of Intent Plat Map Property Owners List Survey, Existing Survey, Proposed Site Plan Staff Hardcover/Lot Coverage Review 1. Hardcover Summary: Zone 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' Existing 864 s.f. (9.1%) 5966 s.f. (29.0%) 1079 s.f. (17.0%) Proposed Same 5516 s.f. (26.3%) Same Allowed 0% 5148 s.f. (25%) 1910 s.f. (30%) Applicant proposes to decrease 75-250' hardcover by removing plastic from all rock beds. 2. The houses in this neighborhood are generally in line, and all angled slightly in relationship to the road. The proposed pool requires an average lakeshore setback encroachment of 74'. 3. Lot coverage including the house, three season porch, pool, patios and associated decks, amounts to 12.7% where 15% is allowed hence no lot coverage variance is required. Zoning File #1557 July 10, 1990 Page 2 of 2 Discussion ~ The applicants proposes to construct a pool of 596 s.f. water surface area, with additional patio and decks. The pool is proposed at grade level at the lakeside of the house, hence the actual degree of lakeview encroachment will be minimized. Due to the angling of the houses in the neighborhood, the adjacent residence to the north at 2690 Pheasant Road will be the most affected. The 74' average lakeshore setback encroachment would be perhaps typical of any of the houses along this street that wished to construct a pool. The typical lot widths of 100' tend to mitigate the impact of pools or other improvements in the lakeshore yards. Also note that the proposed pool at its closest point is 125' from the normal shoreline, hence this house and most of those in the neighborhood have unusually deep lakeshore yards. Applicant proposes to remove whatever plastic exists under decorative rock beds on the property. The applicant's surveyor has assumed that all such beds on the property are underlain by plastic, although he has not verifie" that. Such removals would result in an actual decrease in hardcover to nearly the 25% standard. However, the only other possible hardcover removals witheut starting to remove structure, would be in the sidewalk or driveway area which are established and functional improvements on this property. The boat house on the property is considered as a non- conforming structure, and is subject to the ordinances pertaining to such structures. Generally, those ordinances allow non- structural repair and maintenance (reroofing, residing, painting, etc.) but would not allow replacement of the structure it it was destroyed or became structurally unsound due to aging or other deterioration. Staff Reconmendation - Planning Commission should address the issues of hardcover and make a recommendation as to whether the proposed degree of removals is acceptable. Planning Commission should further determine whether existing lakeviews enjoyed by neighboring property owners are adversely affected. Any recommendation for approval should specify the hardships and justifications for granting of the requested variances. ■ ■ 1^5 CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATfoi#/ Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variali#e) ' Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no ch^knge from original application) After-th«-Fact Fees (Double application fee) rut 35^ )b CITY OF CW Firi^ OFFICE JTS.OD mwo mi PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Phone (home) ^ tYLuM- _____________ Phone (wor)c) ^ B B ^ APPLICANT Name Addressx^~?0~D City; C'X' Zip; -SS ^ ^ / OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address:City;Zip; Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels ot land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property A. Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cort iquest in detailDescrdetail 'TXJL^ VARIANCES REQUIRED _ Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front 'i_ _ Hardcover Side Rear) HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP UNDSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements_ 2. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. S)cetches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application^ please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that yoor variance application is not conplete if the above infomation has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Jcnowledge. Applicant ' s Signature'Date ^ ^^ OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ac)cowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of thi^ request. Owner's Signature rv.Date 6 0 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 6 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. i t 0 AjCn^ \J \ ^/lA-giUA-^O .' A2::MTtLtil, u Oi^t'iL bvA> -n X __ w? i<^J)D cuJi/Y\^ Jt&uuijL^ i) j^/Sv^j^ , 0oj\ pjyo-^ 0 ^ VJ oxy=^-±-=^ : u^ <M ' ,vw4 i'^ll oJl''-^e^-<^\ C<J2^ . UJ<; M A.yCycJ^^—.aa>v u ', ^ cOt2>^-<^ ■ jQjiSb\.cjLy-r-s ‘ . I i ; O <2,-^ .;^J<UJ)6c P "B ^ t O I (we)Uf4 l-d *?ro//<>s of <? O__Ph€a Co r> i- _'_ (print n£une(s) j ^~~~' tr— [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at ^7li0 llcH . also referred to as Land Use Application No. _____. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of * ^ , <• '•• ••• ’V * • .*"• . 7 . •* ' ■ .. •* - . 4-^,» fc ». f RUN DATE OA/05/90 .V BATCH 006 PROP ADOR 0*f<ER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 56 21-117-23 23 0011 02665 PHEASANT RO 6 J DONEFF I D L DONEFF BRYAN A OARCI DONEFF 2685 PHEASANT RO EXCELSIOR MN 55331 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATIOTJ SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST 38 21-117-23 23 0012 02695 PME&SANT RD BAB REDDICK BRADFORD K REDDICK 2695 PHEASANT .70 EXCELSIOR MN £5531 REPORT NO. PI935<i0l PAGE 15 38 21-117-23 23 0013 02705 PHEASANT RD 6 A K JOHNSTON 6 P A K A JOHNSTON 2705 PHEASANT RD S EXCELSIOR EM 55331 I •V PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR S8 21-117-23 IS OOIA 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED PHEASANT IMi HOHEOK^EKS PHEASANT LANN HOHEOmERS 2760 PLEASANT RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0017 02700 PHEASANT RD MICHAEL J CJLLEN ET AL MICHAEL J CULLEN 2700 PHEASANT ROAD EXCELSIOR m 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0019 02690 PHEASANT RD A J S S A DALE ALAN DALE 2690 PHEASAf<T RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 •> • V J PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 21-117-23 23 0020 02680 PHEASANT RD R P DOLLIFF JR ETAL ROGER P DOLLIFF JR 2680 PHEASANT RD EXCELSIOR m 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0052 02720 PHEASANT RO NILLIAM YALE SMILEY ET AL HILLXAM YALE SMILEY 2720 PHEASANT RD EXCELSIOR m 55331 TOTAL 8ATCM 006 00012 38 21-117-23 23 002^ 02725 PHEASANf RO LILLIAN K ECKLUIID NM K I L B HHITHORTH 2725 PHEASANT RD EXCELSIOR m 55351 38 21-117-23 23 0053 02730 PHEASANT RO HIllIAM YALE SMILEY III ETAL WILLIAM YALE SMILEY III 2720 PHEASANT RO EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0050 02685 SHAOVHOOO RO R H BROWN & M H BROWN RICHARD W A MARION H BROWN 2685 SHADY^IOOO RD S EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 32 0n04 02800 PHEASANT Ri CAROL H UURCESS CAROL H BURGESS 2800 PHEASANT RD EXCELSIOR MT4 55331 [ -I • .''•■•'•a () 3 O O ..>2! • •0) ^2PiOO _j^f^ C. 5»^^rv ) . . ^-7r ’• • %ofkmo^i^Z^.h > \‘i,t aVv2.r 5-70 Cjuf^o 75"-z.ra Mo^z^ / ZS^l ^2^ - t 27 X2-/2. “ C b £ / ^7 V2- 2T.2 X 7 2) p “2.1 V 3 A 2.,5* >r II. 2^ i?/7 Z°\ r - /O7 - no u> - nzi^ * Z06.7 E'Srfts. /(x/s __t>ec)c /o><l(^. SiTVIW, j — [Ano _____ JlSoCiS-* rA«inc .........- J?8 JL.^lC,0 ,~ / 2- ^ S c ,'f. - 2.73. irC. ■= /VSO ..... 57C»6»■= z^.oX • •• = K«fc^r7c. /^H___ 7^ = /7o % - BO ;/o -7£T-2 ’ro' : _____ gx/^ - "btrc^ ^ ^87^17^2. ^ 2>eL^-*-r^^RT 3y/y ^ 2./C. - //£> : //i'a- ^ paoL. wsjATirA. A“^A f^yJ^ •= ......................... z srV > s'^o ^TT^S ” / 8 *= .^^6» sA PAt?o Fool-... A^^T p+^iAtoC(2)\/ev2. r: ___ . ____________4o.i “ -18> Pe<*w /^FUCAfJT-^ /^fe-'T-rSA^ r®^‘-<fe‘LT'^ ---------------— _f/j^S^CL /Sg^£ /^i "7^.?4P/___ _Y/ei-jb '-‘/V30 srC. ^/6 HMOI • • •G) ^ - --------------------- CO\J ___ ______ ______ 0 --7r' ^ -,■- I.7r- 2-r^ . >rp. iSTTO i/. C^.y/'O sA^'E' ^ ,.. - S°lUt, ^l(^slCz(..rh S7V-8 'J.(^sryO /o-p1 ip, CL7>p7<^.. ..... /9lO t;^. C'^oy.')> u CcAje^^^ ............. S S«iA.S ^OOU'^ P^o 2-C» ^^7 ;?3. ](^C) IIS 2^ ysr AAJ^f<. 5 s^^yVVi: fsC>L-£^^^ •• «•• 9 9=> 2i& )i4' wr = |^.7’ ®/i /^(/4». SensAc^ (rr^aSc^fiM^^T^ To;Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: July 12, 1990 #1559 John and Roberta Henrich, 4125 Highwood Road Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IB, Single family lakeshore residential, 1 acre, sewered Application - Request for hardcover, average setback, and street setback variances for various improvements. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Pertinent Facts - Application Letter of Request Plat Map Property Owners List Survey, Existing Site Plan Sketch, Proposed Site Plan Hardcover Calculations, Sketch & Summary Proposed Construction Plans 1. Applicants propose the following improvements to the property; A) replace existing 260 square foot deck with new 624 square foot deck; B) construct 6x14' addition at street end of house; C) replace existing 14x16' detached garage with 26x30' detached garage. 2. The following variances are necessary in order to construct the above projects; A) Proposed garage of 780 s.f. requires setbacks of 15' from the side and street lot lines, and 10' from the existing house. Proposed setbacks are 10' from the street lot line and 15' from the side lot line. With these setbacks, it appears feasible for this garage to just meet the 10' required house setback. Zoning File #1559 July 12, 1990 Page 2 of 3 B) An average lakeshore setback variance is required for construction of the new deck. Because the neighboring residence to the east is located only 14* from the street right-of-way, the average setback line by definition runs through the applicants' existing house. C) Existing hardcover in the 75-250' zone is 43.6% where only 25% is normally allowed. Applicants propose net additional hardcover of 8.4% for a total of 52.4%. There is the possibility of reducing hardcover significantly if the extremely large bituminous surface driveway is decreased in size. 3.Applicants propose to combine Lot 19 with Lots 20 and 21, All setbacks and hardcover calculations were reviewed on the basis that the combination will occur. Discussion - The existing garage on this property is fairly small and not easily accessible. The proposed 26x30' garage will have 2h stalls on the main level, with basement space for storage and additional storage within the 12/12 pitch roof. Because this garage exceeds 750 s.f. in footprint area, the normal 10' side and street setbacks are increased to 15' per the Accessory Structures Ordinance revisions adopted in 1989. This garage is proposed to have side-facing doors, therefore the only reason it needs to meet 15' setbacks from property lines is the footprint area just over the 7F0 s.f. limit. The proposed addition to the master bedroom area will meet all required setoacks, and squares off the house. Applicants note that this area is over existing hardcover, hence this addition in and of itself does not add to the overall hardcover increases. The proposed deck system on the lakeside of the house is generally in line with that of the neighboring residence to the west, but extends much nearer the lake than the easterly neighbor. The house to the east is located so near the road as to be non-conforming in location, hence it tends to be not in line with other residences in the neighborhood. Because the proposed decks are nearly 60' from the side lot line, their impact on the views of the neighboring house to the east should be insignificant. Note also that the proposed decks will be approximately 80' from the normal shoreline, hence they require no variance to the 75' lake setback standard. In conjunction with the proposed garage, staff anticipates that approximately 328 s.f. of additional hardcover will be needed in driveway areas to make the new garage functional. i Zoning File #1559 July 12, 1990 Page 3 of 3 The proposed improvements taken as a group, will increase hardcover on the property significantly. While there are likely some areas of sidewalk that no longer will be needed and areas of rock and plastic which could easily be eliminated, these minor removals appear to be a fraction of the net proposed hardcover increase. The property contains a driveway parking area that appears to staff to be quite excessive, and which it would seem could reasonably be cut in half to result in a significant decrease in hardcover on the property. The applicants have not specified where they would consider hardcover removals in the 75-250' zone, although they have been made aware that a requirement for significant removals would likely be part of any approval recommendation. Staff Recommendation - Regarding the proposed garage setbacks. Planning Commission should consider whether this garage will have a significant visual impact in the neighborhood. Is there a better location that would result in less of a hardcover increase? Regarding the proposed bedroom expansion, a recommendation for approval might be appropriate in conjunction with an overall hardcover scheme for the property. If the Planning Commission finds that the proposed decks will cause no significant reduction in existing lakeviews enjoyed by neighboring property owners, then a recommendation for approval would be appropriate. Regarding hardcover on the property, if Planning Commission finds that the proposed hardcover is excessive, applicant could be directed to submit a final site plan proposal that reduces hardcover to some specific percentage to be defined by the Planning Commission. J CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Va.'iance Fee $100.00 (no change from original V: at ion) After—the-Fact Fees (Double .• .plication fe#15 PROPERTY LOCATION 4i^SSite Address vO o nrJ I^oclcI Properry Identification Number (P.I.D.) 01 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Phone (home) ill2-' _ nn AnrJ l^nherta. Ugnr/'clv Phone (work)- Address ; ^^!XB Rcl City: HlcLin/j Zip; OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ __ _ Phene (home) Phone (work) Address:City:_Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT DSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property lR-1B ([^esi^ntia^ Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $—^OjQOQ. Describe request in detail VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front X" Hardcover Side Rear) Other m HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical‘diffic)ilty^ resulting from strictDescribe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulti^ 1 enforcement of zoning regulations; yiec feJJoA:> DBSCRIFTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property condition's preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed, Slcetches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of * any ’other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6.r. 8. YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date Cp/^] kd // OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Pleuming Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an autho.’ ized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. • * I : J.L >/ Variance Request 4115 and 4125 Highwood Road We have recently bought these properties from my parents. My father was over 70 years old. This has caused the property to fall into disrepair. We are therefore submitting plans for improvements to our property which require us to request a variance. Our first request is that we would like to have a garage. The current garage is small, old, and in need of much repair. There is not a direct entry to put a car inside. Winters in Minnesota is our main reason for this request. The plan for our garage would also give us a great amount of storage space which would eliminate outside clutter. We have discussed several locations for the garage. We would like to combine lot 19 (4115 Highwood Road) with lots 20 and 21. Then we would build the garage at the location of the existing garage. We propose to have the doors facing west. We discussed placing it on lot 21, however we would then be backing uphill into traffic and feel this would be unsafe. Our next building intent is to put a small addition on to the master bedroom downstairs. The current bedroom is to small (10* X 13’). The addition would increase the master bedroom to 10’ X 20’ which is still modest by current standards. The current master bedroom has only two closets. These closets are only three feet long and are very inadequate. The addition would double the current closet space. The current bathroom is smaller than the closets. This addition would not increase the percent of hard cover on this lot as it is going to replace driveway and rocks on plastic. Our third request is to put a new deck on the house. The current deck is very small and needs replacing. The lumber is rotting and is a safety hazard. There are no railings and it is not safe for children. Our new plan is to nake it safe and to place it at levels which will not interfere with the view of the lake. The addition of the deck would not fall into the 0-75 foot hardcover ordinance. We really enjoy living on the lake and sitting outside, but the mosquitos are terrible if one is in the grass, especially after dark. The revised deck would allow us to take full advantage of this beautiful setting yet retain its natural charm . RUN DATE 06/l<»/90 BATCH 002 HErtJEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OFMERS LIST REPORT NO. PI4SS401 PAGE 3 'T u 2:' PROf» ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 36 07-117-23 43 0011 04199 NORTH SHORE DR UNITED CH HOSP ASSN FAIRVIEN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2312 SO 6TH ST MPLS HN 55454 38 07-117-23 44 0009 04075 HI6HH00D RO JAN AKERBERG JAN A NORA AKERBERG 4075 HIGHHOOD ROAD MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0010 04079 HIGHHOOD RD JOHN T SANBORN ETAL J T SANBORN 4079 HIGHHOOD RD MOUND m 55364 n-*e.PROP ADDR OmER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 07-117-23 44 0011 04091 HIGHHOOD RD F L JOHNSON A D L FOSS FREDERIC JOHNSON 4091 HIGHHOOD RO MOUND MN 55391 38 07-117-23 44 0012 04099 HIGHHOOD RO OLIIS L NElS0r4 ETAL OLLIS L NELSON 4099 HIGHHOOD RO M0U40 MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0013 04101 HIGHHOOD RD EVA THEOBALD EVA A THEOBALD 4101 HIGHHOOD ROAD MOUND MN 55364 PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 07-117-23 44 0014 04105 HIGHHOOD RO CHARLES E DA MART HILLIAM 6 BRICKLEY 4105 HIGHHOOD MOUND HN 55364 30 07-117-23 44 0015 04109 HIGHHOOD RO GEORGE H APPLEBAUM GEORGE APPLEBAUM 4109 HIGHHOOD RO MOUr40 MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0016 04115 HIGHHOOD RD J H A R J Hl 'RICH JOHN H A ROBEK * J HENRICH 4125 HIGHHOOD kO 0R0r40 MN 55364 **' PROP ADDR J', 0I8CR NAME ^ TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR ft 58 07-117-25 44 0017 04125 HI6HHOOO RO J H « R J HENRICH JOHN N « ROBERT J HENRICH 4125 HIGHHOOD RO ORONO m 55564 50 07-117-25 44 04149 HIGHHOOD LARRY H KARKELA LARRY H KARKELA 4149 HIGHHOOD RD MOUND m 55364 0018 RD 38 07-117-25 44 0019 04156 HIGHHOOD RO FRArCES H HILSON JOHN F TESAR 4156 HIGHHOOD RO R 1 MOUNO HN 55364 4’ Cr. PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 58 07-117-25 44 0020 04167 HIGHHOOD RO MERLIN L HALVERSON MERLIN L HALVERSON 4175 HIGHHOOD RD MOUNO HN 55564 38 07-117-23 44 0021 04175 HIGHHOOD RO MERLIN L HALVERSON MERLIN L HALVERSON 4175 HIGHHOOD RD MOUND m 555b4 38 07-117-25 44 0022 04195 HIGHHOOD RO GAB SCHAUER MARK A FINNEY 4195 HIGHHOOD RO MOUNO m S5564 PROP ADDR (»tlER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR T. 58 07-117-25 44 0024 04190 HIGHHOOD RD JAMES P ZUCCARO JAMES P ZUCCARO 4190 HIGHHOOD RO MOUNO MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0025 04182 HIGHHOOD RO PATRICIA A LINOLAN PATRICIA A LINOLAN 5800 IDLEHOOO RO MOUNO IM 55364 #1JL p1)f 38 07-117-25 44 0026 04174 HIGHHOOD RO M 8 OEVAAN ALE OEVAAN HERBERT A LORETTA OEVAAN 17605 SUSAN DRIVE MlTtlE TONKA FM 55343 560 RUN DATE 06/1A/90 BATCH 002 PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 3B 07-117-25 94 0027 04166 HIGHHOOO RO HAL DEVAAN HERBERT A LORETTA DEVAAN 17605 SUSAN OR MINNETONKA Itt 55343 HEI#4EPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST 58 07-117-23 44 0026 04150 HIGHHOOO RD ROSS NASSETT ROSS NASSETT 4150 HIGHHOOO RD hound MN 55364 report no. PI435401 PAGE 4 38 07-117-23 44 0029 04148 HIGHHOOO RO JANET L EIDE JANET L EIDE 4148 HIGHHOOO RO mound MN 55364 PROP ADDR 0»MER NAME TA>0>AYER NAME/ADDR 30 07-117-23 44 04140 HIGHHOOO PHILLIP M OTTO PHILLIP M OTTO 4140 HIGHHOOO RO hound MN 55364 0030 RD 38 07-117-23 44 0051 04132 HIGHHOOO RD SCOTT G A CATHERINE ANDERSON SCOTT G A CATHERINE ANDERSON 4132 HIGHHOOO ROAD mound MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0032 04116 HIGHHOOO RD BRUCE J MOLUMBY BRUCE J MOLUMBY 4116 HIGHHOOO ROAD MOUND MN 55364 PROP ADDR 06MER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 07-117-23 44 0033 04108 HIGHHOOO RD DAD BAXTER DAVID C A DEBRA J BAXTER 4108 HIGHHOOO ROAD hound Itl 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0034 04104 HIGHHOOO RO GAB SAUER GLEN A BEVERLY SAUER 4104 HIGH>IOOO RO mound MN 553<4 38 07-117-25 44 0035 04104 HIGHHOOO RD GAB SAUER glen a BEVERLY SAUER 4104 HIGHHOOO RD M0UT4D MN 55564 PROP ADDR OltCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 07-117-23 44 0036 00030 AOORESS UNASSIGNEO BRUCE J MOLUMBY BRUCE J MOLUMBY 4116 HIGHHOOO RD mound FM 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0059 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED NARREN J KLIPSTEIN JAMES A LIS8ETH CLEARY 4109 NO SHORE DR mound MN 55364 38 07-117-25 44 0037 00038 AOORESS UNASSIGNEO HARREN KLIPSTEIN JAMES A LISBETH CLEARY 4109 r«) SHORE OR mound MN 55364 38 07-117-25 44 0040 01535 HIGHHOOO LA E G CELMS A L S CELMS ERIK G A LAURIE S CELMS 3607 BENJAMIN ST N E MPLS MF4 55418 38 07-117-23 44 0038 04109 NORTH SHORE DR HARREN J KLIPSTEIN JAMES A LISBETH CLEARY 4109 NO SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-25 44 0041 01535 HIGHHOOO LA E G CELMS A L S CELMS ERIK G A LAURIE S CELMS 3607 BEFUAMIN ST N E MPLS MT< 55418 <r- o (T; PROP ADDR OttCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 58 07-117-23 44 0042 01535 HIGHHOOD LA E 6 CELMS A L S CELMS ERIK 6 A LAURIE S CELMS 3607 BENJAMIN ST N E MPLS Ffl 55418 TOTAL BATCH 002 00034 ^ 1.5 n c FOl/l-I.W •'fl —“ foVs'is; 2da'2 „-.,._ri. • _ _ :• ■• •s84‘»46‘6b"E' •. -;. • i7 v -"-^1 '\L^~ ---fDff.4s-.n-; .■•.-/ < i c>' ~~ n "' ’' ri______> existing housc ! 6 ! • HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET___• SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE)0-75' (^-250y 250-500" 500-1000" E xisting Hardcover in Zone X -A. House ^0^io^d ,.p. LENGTH WIDTH nXS.F.^ s 3.Garage / •" ^<9 X _ X f * f M 1 -i: A - . S.F. - ^ - S • r • X* -w C.Driveway '/ vr X /o' J. •> -r-T fc" / A X /5' t"''1 *? = ^ fr>r> / mtmmm ^ ^ • • >/ F S.F, D. • • Sidewalk -7^'X 1 A O S.F.a/ F X 1« r* = -J * j « S.F. ? - X / S3 / ^S.F. x/T E.?atio / Deck cV^'X / S.F.v^ 1y F.Landscape X •• ■ /3f S.F. ^ AREAS UNDERLAIN BY a'X *•* a 1C,S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING <?X C^'D s !f. • • X S.F.• 6. Other • X • * S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone t S.F. ' cl ' ll'\■ y. 'c> 0 S.F.5 . » - . s- H n X 100 <^3.6 % /'^€sr Ac^incy^At^ P(^pc^:>b^_ ..... '/*^<^/S '»* 7.y"? ^ 2>r<i>__________ ^no /6 1 ... =^ 3 .j2 •.' • Ajf^ T70»UM- !UJ^Jt>CJ>Mm /AJ ACi\:» IT7ojO (Q (ovn^€^/ir?.0 5r \ A^eT"/4t:^>T7oVAU ^C>ylo^-- S:TC^ /^^L-’"^7c^ .i/;C- /^^<4^Cl<5v/dv^ /(s> X/O^' ’^\J7y‘^/^'2^ -*- t y S 'T^ C 2. /^o ^ z- 7“7 |r-,^‘. 2-^ 2.S /lje>*J^/^=^c>^|T7^'^A-c_ “ 3^4» ^^^ jZ30 _ ^ /j , /4y^ ^ (^.f ^2_ .____ ____ ^XK ___________.fl. ?.? .-*'^-'- _ ^ ^ _& ____________^_.5^V ........./^ ^ p CD_______________ __________________(^) ______________________________________________________________________ r jy. r_/38crf. *** /(o - :f . • ^7 )< s7^(2"»</o^ •'A 0 3-70 -17 3'} ___ t <^p 77+^S iAtUOi/Arr AJOT" f/OF€^t^d^^ ,---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------- - . .•> S /*/;^‘YO . _______ ______________ ^ESO = ^‘^,L=>Yo ^f:.ry^J^ ______p£jD^OSeb - ............... /^DlT70AJ4i_ / ] 2^1>0 s:^,V -__ "76 . D To; From: Date: Subject: Planning Conunission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Conunission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator July 12, 1990 #1560 John & Roberta Henrich, 4125 Highwood Road - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Application - Request for variance and conditional use permit to construct retaining walls and grade within the 0-75' protected lakeshore zone. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Pertinent Facts - Application Letter of Request Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Cross Section Site Plan Hardcover Calculations 1. The applicants propose to construct 2 retaining walls, each approximately 3^' in height, approximately 50' long, and approximately 28' and 38' from the shoreline, 2. Existing hardcover in the 0-75' zone is 8.2%, consisting of sidewalks, existing retaining walls, some rock over plastic, a small shed and a small pond area. Applicants propose to remove 410 s.f. of hardcover while adding 68 s.f., hence a net reduction from 1,004 s.f. existing down to 662 s.f., a reduction from 8.2% to 5.4%. 3. City Engineer Glenn Cook has reviewed the application on the site, and make the following verbal comments on July 12th: A) Applicant should provide detailed drawings of the tie- back system proposed for the retaining walls. B) Applicant should stake the end points and midpoints of each proposed wall for further review. Glenn feels that there may be justification for one wall, but possibly not for both depending on the exact locations proposed. Discussion - The proposed reduction in hardcover would appear to be an improvement to the property. It is apparent that existing retaining walls are necessary to keep the slope from washing down the hill. L Zoning File #1560 July 12, 1990 Page 2 The City has in the past generally denied retaining walls where their installation was strictly for the convenience of maintenance than for actual protection of the lakeshore bank. In this case, additional information regarding the proposed location of the walls is needed to determine how many walls are necessary to stabilize the bank and wh-^re they should be located. Also, applicants should provide - ation as to how the walls will be screened to reduce their Ity from the lake. Staff Recommendation - Staff recommends tabling the request pending additional information for review as follows: a. Provide tie-back system design; b. Stake the wall locations; c. Provide a landscaping/vegetation plan for screening CITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION _ _ _ _ _ _ _^ PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Property C‘rvAi;rr nccjrc I jiAniTw^ ui I auu f 7-V» vA» VVV>^ i/w’Vtf-V WW UlSiS ^/^hujoaJ Vo^d ------------------------------__S3££>|s^® » Identification Number (P.I.D.) <97"w§m'' m-wnm/ U / V J /V^» Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey Name JiVln an/j tVgJhPIdh ------^Phone (work) Ml31 3^----- ‘-IIH5 t-i^^hcOnod T?na J CityAddress OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _- Address Phone (home) Phone City Zip Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels _______ PEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee ^ After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fe $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use _ _ _ _ $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) X $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use '$200.00^Land Alteration I , Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain - - Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. lakeshore- - Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 of lakesnore PRD/PID - see fee schedule other APPLICATIONS , „ j fees)$200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant feesj $250.00 Vacation “ $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $250.00 Rezcning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $100.00 Appeals _ _ _ _ Other - see fee schedule • • PRESENT OSB OP PROPERTY ^ q Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Other DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: 2. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Fina^hce A-6 0 3 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X I?" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Icnowledge. Applicant's signature Date // OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ac)cnowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature ^ Date 0 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. I » • • ^156 Land Use Variance 4115 and 4125 Highwood Road We are requesting a land use variance to keep the hill from falling slowly into the lake. The hill is slumping. This slumping is causing walk ways to tilt at strange angles causing difficult walking. The slumping is also causing the beautiful rock retaining wall to crack and lean backwards. This wall is an integral part to the structure of the yard. The current hill is ( at places ) in excess of 45 degrees and most of it exceeds 30 degrees. These steep angles makes it impossible to safely mow any grass which may grow there, and due to this situation, there is normally more weeds than grass. Over the years low maintenance ground cover has been put in but weeding this area is very difficult due to the angle of the hill. Weed killer is out of the question due to run off into the lake. We would be adding less than 68 square feet of hard cover and would be removing 410 square feet of hard cover. The hill as it currently exists is deteriorating and impossible to manage. These changes will improve the looks of the yard and at the same time the terracing would slow the rush of water during rain storms which enters the lake directly and allow it to percolate slower. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS The retaining walls would be constructed of 5 X 6 treated lumber. They would be nailed together with timber spikes and there would be an L-shaped tie down timber sunk at least 48 inches below grade and attached to the retaining wall with angle irons and wood screws. i ‘ I . RUN DATE 06/14/90 BATCH OOZ PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADOR 0Hr4ER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP ADOR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP ADOR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP ADOR 0HT4ER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR PROP ADDR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OILERS LIST 38 07-117-23 43 0011 04199 NORTH SHORE DR UNITED CH HOSP ASSN FAIRVIEH COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2312 SO 6TH ST HPLS HN 55454 38 07-117-23 44 0011 04091 HIGHHOOD RO F L JOHNSON A 0 L FOSS FREDERIC JOHNSON 4091 HIGH»^D RD HOUND m 55391 38 07-117-23 44 0014 04105 HIGHHOOD RD CHARLES E DA HART HILLIAH G DRICKLEY 4105 HIGHHOOD MOUr40 HN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0017 04125 HIGHI^OO RO J H S R J HENRICH JOHN H A ROBEkT J HENRICH 4125 HIGHHOOD RO ORONO m 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0020 04167 HIGHHOOD RO HERLIN L MALVERS0t4 HERLIN L HALVERSON 4175 HIGHHOOD RD HOUND m 55364 38 07-117-23 44 04190 HIGHHOOD JAHCS P ZUCCARO JAMES P ZUCCARO 4190 HIGHHOOD RD HOUNO HN 55364 0024 RO 38 07-117-23 44 0009 04075 HIGHHOOD RO JAN AKERBERG JAN A NORA AKERBERG 4075 HIGHHOOD ^OAD Hour;:- mn 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0012 04099 HIGHHOOD RD OLLIS L NELSON ETAL OLLIS L NELSON 40<^9 HIGHHOOD RD H0Ur4D m 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0015 04109 HIGHHOOD RD GEORGE H APPLEBAUH GEORGE APPLEBAUH 4109 HIGHHOOD RO MOUND m 55364 38 07-117-23 4*4 04149 HIGHHOOD LARRY H KARKELA LARRY H KARKELA 4149 HIGHHOOD RD MOUfJD MN 55364 0018 RD 38 07-117-23 44 0021 04175 HIGHHOOD RD NERLir4 L HALVERS044 MERLIN L HALVERSON 4175 HIGHHOOD RO MOUND HN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0025 04182 HIGHf'KKlO RO PATRICIA A LINDLAf^ PATRICIA A LINDLAN 5860 IDLEHOOD RO MOUND MT4 55364 #1 REPORT NO. PI<»55^01 PAGE 3 38 07-117-23 A4 0010 0<«079 HIGHHOOD RD JOHN T SAN80RN ETAL J T SANBORN <«079 HIGHHOOD RD HOUND m SS36<t 58 07-117-23 44 0013 04101 HIGHHOOD RD EVA THEOBALD EVA A THEOBALD 4101 HIGHHOOD ROAD HOUND HN 55364 r-. 38 07-117-23 44 0016 04115 HIGi ilOOD RO J H 1 R J HENRICH JOHN H > ROBERT J HENRICH 4125 HIGHHOOD RO ORONO MN 55564 38 07-117-23 44 0019 04156 HIGHHOOD RO FRANCES H HILSON JOHN F TE5AR 4156 HIGHHOOD RO R 1 hOLR40 rui 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0022 04195 HIGHHOOD RO G t B SCHAUER MARK A FirjfiEY 4145 HIGHHOOD RO MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-25 44 0026 0417h HIGHHOOD RO H 8 OEVAAN ALE OEVAAN HERBERT t LORETTA OEVAAN 17605 SUSAN DRIVE MlNTJETOtJKA MN 55343 f I r .^v o#1660 J o o •'■'i ; I i •• fj RUN DATE 06/14/90 BATCH 002 PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP AOOR CmiH NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR PROP ADDR (M4ER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP AOOR OHT4ER NAHE TAXPAYER rUHE/ADDR HEM4EPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWERS LIST 38 07-117-23 44 0027 04166 HI6HNOOO RD HAL DEVAAN HERBERT A LORETTA DEVAAN 17605 SUSAN DR HINNETONKA fti 55343 38 07-117-23 44 04140 HIGHHOOD PHILLIP H OTTO PHILLIP H OTTO 4140 HIGHHOOD RO HOUND HN 55564 0030 RD 38 07-117-23 44 0033 04108 HIGHHOOD RD DAD BAXTER DAVID C A DEBRA J BAXTER 4108 HIGHHOOD ROAD HOUND HN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0036 00038 ADDRESS UI4ASSIGr4ED BRUCE J HOLUriBY BRUCE J HOLUHBY 4116 HIGHHOOD RD HOUND HN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0039 00038 ADDRESS UI4ASS HARREN J KLIPSTEIN JAMES A LISBETM CLEARY 4109 NO SHORE OR H0UT40 HN 55364 ;>olG44EO 38 07-117-23 44 0042 01535 HIGHHOOD LA E G CELHS A L S CELMS ERIK G A LAURIE S CELHS 3607 BENJAMIN ST N C MPLS MT4 55418 38 07-117-23 44 0028 04150 HIGHHOOD RD ROSS NASSETT RCSS NASSETT 4150 HIGHHOOD RO MOUT40 MT4 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0031 04132 HIGHEIOOO RO SCOTT G A CATHERINE ANDERS0f4 SCOTT G A CATHERINE ANDERSON 4132 HIGHHOOD ROAD M0Ur4D h/4 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0034 04104 HIGHHOOD RO GAB SAUER GLEN A BEVERLY SAUER 4104 HIGHHOOD RO MOUr^O Hr4 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0037 00038 ADDRESS Ur4ASSIG?4ED HARREN KLIPSTEIN JAMES A LISBETH CLEARY 4109 NO SHORE OR M0U40 Mf4 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0040 01535 HIGHHOOD LA E G CELMS A L S CELMS ERIK G A LAURIE S CELMS 3607 BENJAMIN ST N E MPLS MT4 55418 TOTAL BATCH 002 00034 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 4 38 07-117-23 44 0029 04148 HIGHHOOD RD JANET L EIDE JANET L EIDE 4148 HIGHHOOD RD HOUND m 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0032 04116 HIGHHOOD RO BRUCE J MOLUMBY BRUCE J MOLUMBY 4116 HIGHHOOD ROAD MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0035 C4104 HIGHHOOD RO GAB SAUER GLEN A BEVERLY SAUER 4104 HIGHHOOD RO EtOUr40 hI4 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0038 04109 NORTH SHORE DR HARREN J KLIPSTEIN JAMES A LISBETH CLEARY 4109 m SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0041 01535 HIGHHOOD LA E G CEIMS A L S CELMS ERIK G A LAURIE S CELMS 3b07 BENJAMIN ST N E MPLS MN 55418 up * V f‘‘»•!K C|0 & • \; ’, • ’ -»- -• i ■■"Tj i ..^ ' i ■% i ' C « ■*i! ' r • J M • •• i« »•"y -!"1 OItft 0-7 f n 2. \ \ ✓ . • #1ID o( loft'j^' - ‘-.Vma^^*___1 .--. - .. . I i/l-tji /''-30 mmMmmm /‘■fr'} V-- *; “.*; • ■''• |v'-•••■/.-X ■■v ?:- - -<-^^iJ :’ii ii r' • •• ■ ' . s '•-• '. i.,. • ! : i -.»■ mm ;;i j^’■'■'.■ ’■. ■ '.•••i"'..';l < -i ‘ •iT'»; '•■vt. - 4 •'. I- ; . •;> ^liA .. y-K mmM ;. -♦ ' . * •■ r r_.; mm:gmMs?s Siiiii ;-v-<W^t;V ‘--0''':*'• .• • •>’«'/* ****r^^ w !• “• mSMim^tgmv-:’- ay^:a!:> ii iSi®;’ ii s^i ssit»<s mr^mamm »g .■•=..,VK •:'•• --v-^HIM fciii ^ V K --v. ■■NSMIfc ?i-' . « i • * HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone A. House B. 6ara86 c. Driveway t. Patio/ Deck F.Landscape AREAS underlain BY plastic SHEETING LENGTH D. Sidewalk I Cl'S, . X .. X WIDTH 5? /X ]0 Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone B r\ cr* ^0 i,oo4 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.r. S.F. S.F. . S.F. . S.F. S.F. B X 100 - % Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:July 12, 1990 Subject:#1561 Christine Beck, 3820 Cherry Avenue Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IC Total Area = 30,540 s.f, or .7 acres Required *= 21,780 s.f. Pertinent Ordinances ~ Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 - Lakeshore setback for proposed deck extension within 75 ’ of the lakeshore protected area. Existing = 27' (stairs leading from lakeshore deck approved variance #1172, 9/14/87) Existing = 37'4" (existing 5' overhang along lakeside of house) Existing Cantilevered Lakeside Addn = 39'8" Proposed Deck Extension = 37' (deck addn will extend 4" beyond 5' overhang) Setback Variance = 38' or 50.6% Existing Variance Approved for Deck/Stairs =48' or 64% Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Lakeshore hardcover within 0- 75' . 0-75' Setback Area = 11,250 s.f. Original Hardcover Approved with Variance Application #1172 = 1,751.5 s.f. or 15.5% Adjusted Hardcover Level Based on Overhang Width at 5' Rather than 4' as Originally Measured = 1,774 s.f. or 15.7% (increase ol 22.5 s.f.) Proposed Hardcover = 1,804.4 s.f. or 16% (includes deck area not included beneath existing 5' overhang - 23.5' of addn deck at 4" and 1' extension of deck as it extends to the edge of house increase in hardcover of 30.4 s.f.) Zoning File #1561 July 12, 1990 Page 2 of 3 List of Exhibits Exhibit A “ Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G “ Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - Exhibit K - Application Property Owners List Plat Map Deck/Stair Plan Approved #1172 Planning Commission Minutes 8/17/87 Council Minutes 9/14/87 Site Plan . Section/Existing/Cantilevered Lakeside Addition Plus Overhang Section/Proposed/Deck with Overhang Survey Staff Sketch Review of Application #1172 ~ Applicant received approval for a lakeside deck and stair structure within the 0-75' setback area resulting in a total reduction of 55.1 s.f. of hardcover. The majority of the deck was placed over existing hardcover improvements such as the foundations of a former attached structure and a patio area and the removal of a storage structure consisting of 242 s.f. of hardcover located within 15' of the lakeshore. Staff can confirm that all necessary hardcover removals have been completed. Review of Current Application - As noted above, hardcover calculations within 0-75' setback area have been adjusted as it was determined that the total overhang along the lakeside of the house is at a 5' width ^rather than 4'. The applicant now proposes the removal of a 2'8"x22.5 cantilevered lakeside 'ddition and the extension of the 5'4" deck along the complete lakeside of the house (5'4"x23*6"). ^ Total increase of hardcover within the 0—75' setback area with installation of the deck will be 30.4 s.f. as deck will extend 4 beyond existing 5' overhang and will extend 23^' rather than the existing 22%'. The setba''’*. of the deck will be now at 37' where the existing overhs -u v ;s 37'4". The proposed deck extension will continue to hav.-. the 5' overhang (review Exhibit I). Options of Action - Denia.l. If the application is to be denied, please refer to the necessary findings in the variance sections of the code; or Zoning File #1561 July 12, 1990 Page 3 of 3 Approval. Staff has noted the following findings for consideration in your recommendation: 1. The deck extension along the front of the house will provide less of a visual impact and will be less intense in structure than the existing structure. Expansion will result in minimal hardcover increases and encroachment into the lakeshore protected area. 2. The applicant's son has advised that the existing deck has served his elderly mother, but askes for the extension to provide a shaded deck area as existing deck remains in the sun throughout the majority of the day. Mr. Beck has also provided photographs of the portion of the structure under consideration for review by members at your meeting. Staff would suggest the following conditions for consideration: 1. Removal of 30.4 s.f. of existing hardcover to offset new aditional hardcover from proposed deck expansion. 2. Applicant is placed on notice that no further structural improvements to the structure located within the 75' setback area is allowed without Council approval. *ITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address kvE.- - - - - - i D i)r Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)ITY OF OROi^O Attach legal description to application if not included on •• Irequired survey. miytirc ncnrc a w*w'V»Lv^v vvv _ n 01 QDl 175. CHECK 71 175.00 RECEIPT-THT^ YOU -TA ' V' LWJ. tWx IAfc/*VV* t f \*i /Ot / W' APPLICANT Name C. UCi SiTt c. Phone (home) 4~\\-'1^Cc> Phone (work) N/A /L\.= P/?v _ _ _ _ City:_- - - - - - - - Zip:_ti^ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name C _ _ _ _ _ Phone (home) _ _ Phone (work) \l/A Address: S?ZO (iQy At’g. Date Property Acquired (^4(.> City: hccA.t>«o _ _Zip :_tlirva. (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District _ __ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Present Use of Property_ _ _ __ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $—?, I— Describe request in detail: Pgri.v£ U^gi StQg qp VARIANCBS REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Setback Variances ( >C Front Hardcover Side_ _ _Rear) Other HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: AuigAov mAt^^ucAMi^ AflgA Oaig- ToAfc^g:__________________________________________________ DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: Twe. i.^ 5b-r Y,gAgk Quo A nq /2r>/v= |g■^ lb 7-i Yt.'' P^rtnUAi-ofs (Vruipg CiX^Owu**/., Aho Ln*’ kPX\SSi. Qajt\co^\^ ___ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11'' X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff:__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature <i Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. 0/to/*)0Owner's Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at al3 scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. \ \ um r N c-ui Ok '^y^f t *t(il 0*.(* r/nn #MJR t rk ir*‘t r/ 17 IIP !;•••• I . 0 * inPB r* :r i.’mi i; • / lip i;*r.;. lun® rnr #op» • • I i;*‘ti 1. i^iip I M • .iin’” r>5f* |r;i# r *iR t7fii i; TAiiP I. ‘tt/APC# r*ir* #^*'P I I* »7»1t 1/ »rAMP l.ir»t/ACO« ( C I * ' ;» liPiaPlti cut ij IVMICM jufrifiU’JH SiSff" l\ DM I f * CaJif CS 11^* 39 06 11/ M n 0001 e^nro fl•llil tibl A 11 (» I <#i irs C**: IM l» * I *«• ir^ro I *4 »-1 A.I f:i SM* ->11 09 11/ M n eou 0^bl0 laciM i».i» I tP n I » r'Ml util MM A a Oli»tl t tA*l »t If 16 IIOIM * I OP (rcpAi rtj !s».i 16 o'> M eziv 0^311 A/| !,M!I |/»V I in tlM 0« I p/l r:iK <i'll'/p VI 1110 I**' /*•' 19 06 11/ M Id 10^1 I J OPIII I lit mviiri * veil M/ :*,u: CAprn ii miu ^illcmiM lAi %/|/o 16 0*11/ r) lA to«A 01610 lA^'TM VfPA'f TP n I V OAMt wiiiun A I riAi/i i iA»rpf VIA IWfM V/ICCI OR (jpj*fj ffl VI'«! RflU)T lJU. ri«.lVADl TAU 0 n 06 iii.:i 11 C9C? eiirfr A.I p I I ii/»r M»i UtMTO I I tll/Af llN HA»r,(»4 i:rt fiiMAf All rfAiii rfi ssii6 66 06 4! • *\ 11 OPOl 01616 rnf• I AVI A t (‘-'kit !t; I ' lAI A C 1» A’J lllA IMP AVI rrjLto n\ svv% 16 09 11/ n 11 t11» 013:v C»if*Of AVI i f a I i u AAiTl'PI ill - * a IIVA V :v i * I S* Ail VO ftkBtJ ffl 1M^% 16 0611/ ri 11 001a 01*11 CMMf AVI viAii lAifi oiri Cl I « 0« If (J D lir» 6/ii/Ff If oiro ivafvi 16 OP 11/ :• 11 09*0 f^pi6 OP /* a f o*'*i U A I 0 I lAlfiPl I'l If »r V IH V •• I OR !• fil ft. SMVI 16 06 11? ?1 16 oe.o 0*916 ir»-|M VKffI OP It a > r*iM PIllMM A • f'*»H I 6A*rvf 116 I-I t»p D f>Al tti I =1^ H'? i 16 06 I I / M Vd 06^.3 flMO MVlIt V*'T'| DP u a 1 f 111 umi/fi A a 01 A*/* I VA»i pf If IA »crit« Vi'A’l OP UAI/AIA rfl |M6| 16 09 II? :i 16 0061 • 161A I#»IH V*fS-'l UP nit otMi MiiiAn A a rr/*ii i iA»rpf 161A irriH v» A»l OP CA'*j/fi rt« 11101 «rs 16 66 It? M 16 COl? KIPI 1 I IDin I lAI iitui 1 I loin i;t,6 itjPiM V*/VC PP UAf/AIA f«i SllO* lOlAI EAlLn 006 tOOU K) RO N0;J9) I 0 It: .V »' 0 /! k; I VI ,^i.r'vv i’ ;•; ii Vij <*i r PUCC 2 4 ?•• • • r - I ^•i%ViV.%Vr.v.y.-rr.-.-.-.-.-.-...»-V—a r :i 0 -4 f - >• — ■T...............i II; Jl j:.:: ‘ •-I Is :7 4 :d*ck platform f ontinuout 42* Oorner rolling OMltting tiouio • •• from door stoop -------^ 4 • • HIHUTKS or TH£ PLAMIIIMC COMMISSIOM mCiCTlMC HELD AUGUST 17, 1917 I loss UAASOli COMTXMUEO Carol LaQuayt 2090 North Shore Drive, owner of property abutting the Hanson property, voiced concern that the Hanson/Colden lot line redefinition altered her property line according the Holes Knutson survey she received. Chairean Kelley advised Ms. LaQuay to contact the surveyors and attorneys involved if she felt there was a problea with her property line location. Assistant Zoning Adainistrator Caffron explained to Me. LaQuay the Uanaon/Colden lot line redefinition in which he felt did not affect the LaQuay property line in any way. Regarding the proposed location of the garage. Bellows stated that although there are alternative locations, she felt the proposed location was the easiest and beat alternative noting that the proposed garage did not abut another structure nor was a fire hazard. Johnson concurred with Bellows iinling tnat the proposed location of garage causeo lo light enfringeeent on Mrs. Golden's garden due to the tize of lota. Planning Coeeissioners Hanson and Cohen felt the 10* setback should be maintained due to the opposition by Mrs. Golden. There were no other comments froe the public. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Plarning Cosimissioner Hanson, to deny the variance recommending that the 10* side setback be maintained per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 4. Bellows, Johnson, Kelley, and Drown voted nay. Motion denied. It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to recoousend approval of the variance of a side setback variance of no less than 4.6* as proposed finding no light enfringement upon the Golden property. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays '1. Cohen and Hanson voted nay. Motion carried. • 1172 ClIEISTIirX UCX 3820 cuKABY Avianni VAJIIAMCIIS COHTINUATIOII OP PUBLIC aBABlIIG 7:62-7x66 Christine Beck and her this matter. son, James Beck, were present for Zoning Administrator M.busth explained the request to I construct a deck consisting of 464.4 s.f. of area. H.NUT«. OK TUK C0M«,SS10« MKKTiKC «KU, AUC06T 17. 1,.7 • 11V2 liw:* CONTIUUIU) replace tho*«xJ«tinT cVment ^^Vl'’rV*p4v d^* th“idkelhore^‘*’?hriotiV*aid^^^ «*thxS*7S*f cct •* reduction®05*5^1*7^ J9ein«t t *• *hardcover^*litt)Vt* h** lV*V consiita of wetlanda. Tl.o itlttlrMl Pf°P«rty 34 from the lakeshore And •^•P* and pntio arm from the lakeehofe. ^ propoeed deck la 27* provide®t‘'IafVdid^ea^‘tlt*’nt9oV^ated®'‘ ‘‘••igned to xndivlduala. which replac'^. the old paut,?* eld^ly ^-tter7nd* th®. ®pu" thi. ^3174 CSAIG K« AMDOISOII SISCOIID RBVIEM reco.Mtd*‘‘appr^o®Ill' t*®®JJt“ to recommendation. Motion. Ayea *. -a ot*"®* Craiq Ander.on waa present for thia a.atter ----------- *» w V ft a p”l!ittiry®Jitt VrtltnV^V**' Saffron reviewed the reviewed the atef: aketet) recoil^**PPJ leant end propoaed property Ijneto oro®^^^*-"^*"? adjuat the envelope for Lot^. due to the -V* * \*r9er bulldin9 Variances are i.eer-.jd foJ lo? widVh^/\«?**r«th lots. width at 50* aetback for ".tt.r. * " *ro. th. public r.p.rdln. Chi. Ocl Icwg stated r. .. technically waa a* *r create two Maq iV:- Slie felt the It., ^ t^ut would not aupr response to tl.a- configuration car Ca f r r on state! iiuLdivicfed It Inr present neny probleea. ■ - . for one house,...e two fls9 lot subdlvison. or of how this parcel of lend'e Assistent Zcnir>9 Adeinletr- - or v^ien t.ie entire percel wee -ock lot with two recten9ular w T 1 Mimrres or the wwoiar oroiw cotmcit wbtxho bbld bbwiwbi 14. IM7 ,1056 BAHSOM 'dVnV.JVuV«^??2c!!nrth." that the variance stated that tha Hanaon'a of t.i^ Golden prop therefore# no herdehip for have only one garage would not require e a double garage. .\*^"A,ormatlcn fro* a reputable variance. ®**®^*°j »hat the garage could be contractor. ^or .»«. tMt tt,. pr.p...< ip-oi* »•»«• 2 «ed for car and boat storage. It was ntoved by variance to crabek, to adopt **®*°\'*2i! Sf* a detached doub) a garage permit the aid® l®t line subject to"located 4 « feet f^rom^th.^s^ld.^1^ of a lot ll«® <^*^17^CHR1STIMB BBCK 3ft«^CBBItRT AVWUB iSJtSlOB #2253 Christine Beck and her son. Jaees Beck, were present for this matter. City Administrator ®®’^"^"®*°^t**VtVoiT^^ d^k**t^o b® variances to ^tte shoreline In eschange forPlaced 27 feet from the snore line ^ ^ removal of a 1“*'®*'^^'^^. 1 s f. or .5% within the 0-75* hardcover reduction °5.*Vhat* the deck stairs may be.55:%^:.,.. ..«»r encroachment• this variance. “,7- rr';‘v..7: v;.*.': '.'.'.55 "*• fi; m'. .l^Tly ~'-'- It ... »ov.a ^y '°j„pt‘7.i7.V j»V .*•»'In. t"5 |- ft t • f m. ® *w e . . ^ I • • . H :P JJ, -g (j\\or 10 Su-Pi’CSL-T Pcit ^''Une ! kl OUe/eh J S.S3*?.|'4 oT^ 0)fe ^^ Ml^ ^"fSTFuoOR! r ^ J ^ /' nu< 35 O. 5.2 (.0 It.Z \J 5.0 16.0 5: tn M uj L .X V.• ^ / ^€L# •’*il ii . 1*. • vt ':r ‘ i ly ,» I* • I ! 5»!1{:! I t ! I •. ;• t •., '• ' ‘ T.'•! ?•* i •• 1 1 • • i • ' •* •• J:'‘ IM 1 !•• > • • ; 1 i . \1 *■ irii" ♦ . • *»• . -i-fi' 4 41 1«;' ’, tmM. Mf;( pS.8fe*|. • ^ . .-•— f *T*28.g r t ♦t'»* I*' ; 5 j ■■•. !. t'1 I'-Vi U; Ml^in l ' • ;* \ * ' f* I z'^ I ■t. I -a v,^;4i/:,r L L . > \ ^ *_« To;Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Date Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator July 13. 1990 #1563 Maurene & Jerry Denzel» 1295 Elmwood Avenue Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR**1B Required Area = 1 acre Ejjisting = 12,789.7 s.f. or 4.29 acres Pertinent Ordinance- Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 - Average lakeshore setback Proposed access stairs from lakeshore deck encroaches average setback line by approximately 2'. Applicant ,an be encouraged to realign access stair so as not to encroach average setback line. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover variances 0-75' area = 4,350 s.f. Allowed * 0 Existing = 120 s.f. (4' wide access stairs to lakeshore) 75-250' setback area = 8,439.75 s.f. Existing = 2,616.8 s.f.*l or 31% Proposed = 2,742.6 s.f.*2 or 32.4% Total Increase in Hardcover “ 125.8 s.f. or 1.49% Garage plus step = 443.6 s.f. House ° 880.28 s.f. Paved/Concrete Walks = ?14 s.f. Drive = 747 s.f. Rock Garden « 232 s.f. *2 Garage - 672 s.f. Access Drive,Parking Area = 434 s.f. House = 1,173.2 s.f. Deck/Steps/Cement Walk *=> 463.4 s.f. (includes rock garden at 176 s.f.) Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) - Side setback variance Required » 10' Existing ■ 4' Variance** 6' (Second floor dormer expansion within substandard side setback) Zoning File #1563 July 13, 1990 Page 2 List of Exhibits r Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit L Exhibit M - Application 1 - Applicants Addendum - Property Owners List - Plat Map - Survey - Adjacent Property Owners Acknowledgements - Elevations - First Floor Plan - Second Floor Plan - Basement Floor Plan - Garage Elevation - Garage Floor Plan/Foundation Plan - Garage/Section - Average Lakeshor Setback Line Review of Current Application ~ The applicants propose a dining room, 3-season porch and deck addition at the first level providing a new formal entrance to the house within the dining room addition. The 8x8 second floor dormer expansion will provide room for a second floor bathroom. In addition, applicant proposes relocation of existing nonconforming detached garage with a new conforming detached structure. The existing garage is located approximately 1-2' off the existing right-of-way of Elmwood Avenue. The new garage will be placed 10' off the right-of-way with doors facing away from the roadway providing turnaround on site consistent with the directives of the ordinance for lakeshore lots and detached garages within street yards. The applicant has already discussed the use of the unimproved right-of-way adjacent to the property. John Gerhardson has approved the use of it as long as the owner assumes the complete maintenance of his driveway within the unimproved public right-of-way. The City does maintain Elmwood Avenue. As applicants addendum notes they have maintained unimproved right-of-way by removing debris and junk and maintaining drainage. They have provided erosion control by installing plantings within the severely sloped areas adjacent to the lake and have continued to maintain drainage through the ditch and culvert. The applicant asks that this approximate 2,000 s.f. of unimproved right-of-way be credited against their property as a consideration in the hardcover review. As already noted in the factual findings above, the access stairs from the lakeshore deck encroaches the average lakeshore setback line by approximately 2'. This can be adjusted with a simple realignment of the stairs. Zoning File #1563 July 13, 1990 Page 3 Staff has met with the applicant on site and has reviewed the proposed improvements in relation to existing mature trees. It would appear that only 1 tree shall be removed as a result of these improvements and it would appear to be a tree that hangs dangerously low over the existing residence. Review Exhibits F & I, a drainfield proposed to handle drainage from walkout basement door at south side. Detailed plans of drainfield must be provided with building plans at time of application for building permit. There is a concrete block wall that has been placed right on the shared lot lines of the property. The wall is in a serious state of disrepair. The applicant has advised that they have no plans to replace the walls that have already fallen adjacent to the house. It is not the City's intention to get in the middle of a potential dispute between the neighbors nor do we wish to create one. The hardcover facts did not include the partial encroachment of the wall into the applicants property nor was the improved overhang included as it did not exceed a 1 1/2' width. An additional 125.8 s.f. of hardcover is proposed as a result of the improvement. Please review Exhibit A-1, applicant's comments on the hardcover issue. Options of Action Denial - If denied, please refer to the necessary findings in the variance sections of your code. Approval - If approved, the following findings and hardships may be considered: 1. There are no additional lands available to acquire. Applicant does have the benefit of a non-hardcover area located within the 50' unimproved right-of-way adjacent to the property. 2. The improvements appear consistent with the recent upgrades of the properties within the neighborhood. 3. The following conditions may be considered by the Planning Commission in their recommendation: 4 a. Proposed hardcover cannot exceed the level of existing hardcover at 31%. Applicant must agree to remove 125.8 s.f. or 1.49% of existing hardcover. b. Applicant to redesign staircase from lakeshore deck so that there is no encroachment of the average lakeshore setback line. c. Any others deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission. » % CITY OF ORONO - VMIIANCB APPLICATION #1563 fr Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address cOOO d _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) QO/^_ L’lrycvaiav-c nccjrc ____' •‘i'*' y1 if 0. w* w‘Vfc. V' V\#V “ 01 CZ\> 225.cm' JL 225.00YOU fflS2l30 cool EOl 710:2106/22/90 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. applicant Phone (home) Name. \ Phone (work) Ur (^35-b^6 l/_. Address: City: Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. mb mr mb bm mb MB mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm ^m ^m mm mm mm mm m • mm mm mm ^m ^m ^m mm cm ^m m* mm mm mm mm mm mm ^m mm mm mm PRESENT OSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential u other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: Estimated Construction Cost $ 2-^0. T^ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front X Hardcover X Side Rear) Other Cm-uj yeiifeT/4c\ i)^/t /sj /y>e. 0/7 ly ^d^id^ locaJ^d 0/7 BImhhi HARDSHIP ' ' , Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty^resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: A/0 ^fl£. (\({) Uj^Of^L^Q^Ot^T'/tC'T f^rrdifs/d. OjOm)&£QQ/tj ^ RMjQn)^, AJO ’^fio^£, /-AycJS0 Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning c • •• REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 3. 5. 6. 7. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17'' OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT•S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. VApplicant's Signature ^/Tka.Cc lCyC£_Date 6>pd/fO OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry .onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Date U^/9dOwner's Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ V" Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. • % - ^ ‘ , ^.' 4 ■ '• ••. . . V • '. •. • *. I . i .. T.-' f-' f • 1>t RUN DATE 05/2^/90 BATCH 002 ])PROP AODR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR •» n/ f PROP ADDR OltlER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR t. PROP ADDR y (M4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR \AROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR i HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST 3S 07-117-2S I^ 0016 00038 ADDRESS UNASSI^O STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF ORONO 38 07-117-23 41 0013 01205 NORTH ARM DR PAUL R SKAGERBER6 PAUL R SKAGERBER6 1205 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 41 0016 01205 ELMHOOD AVE T t J REGNIER THOMAS D I JANE REGNIER 1205 ELMHOOO AVE MOUND MN 55364 58 07-117-23 41 0021 01310 ELMHOOD AVE GORDON N NELSON ETAL GORDON N NELSON 1310 ELM^COD MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 41 0088 01304 ELmOOO AVE RICHARD J J0Hr^4 ET AL RICHARD J JOHNSON 1304 ELMHOOO MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0034 00036 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF ORONO C0f4VEYED 2/8/82 ST DEED 161147 38 07-117-23 41 0014 01245 NORTH ARM DR ROBERT G HOVLANO GEORGE HOVLANO imS NO ARM DR HOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 41 0017 01265 ELMHOOO AVE JOHN A PERKir4S JR ETAL JOHN PERKINS 1265 ELrtlOOO AV MOUND HN 55364 V 38 07-117-23 41 0029 01301 NORTH ARM DR E N KALLERUP A T RIPLEY ERICK KALLERUP 1301 NORTH ARM DR MOUr^D MT4 E5364 TOTAL BATCH 002 00013 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 4 38 07-117-23 14 0059 01199 ELMHOOD AVB v/J I E HARVEY J SCOT HARVEY 1199 ELMHOOD MOUND MN #1562 38 07-117-23 41 0015 01285 NORTH ARM DR M B HENRY i L M HENRY MICHAEL B A LISA M HENRY ■1285 NORTH ARM DR MOUr40 MN 55364 \/ 38 07-117-23 41 0018 012^5 EL^PIOOD AVE J A DENZEL AML DENZEL jr.ROME A MAURENE L DENZEL 1295 ELMHOOD AVE *KXJND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 41 0030 01306 EL1t4000 AVE KEITH E SIMONS/PERSONAL I^P C i-nKck: C<^iylsdn 1305 ELMHOOD AV MOUND HN 55364 V73-S705 ou.ner^ „ " H?i-3|03, 1 700 CfunfV i'L c\ H € Alc/uv'iH >11—- ) MJN DATE 05/24/90 BATCH 002 HErt4EPlN COONTV PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY ONNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 5 & f ‘4 #1563 # % If # rrAO' ..‘•f • I • I • f 1 • -I' t - T - r - r - r • i • • • • • • I I I • • I r I • I « • I • (¥«C 4 05) I -roor mm ««i r'"t (Mil i C-.1.: '’miiii j....:yvC2)« ; • \r, I , >--------r f -'n-- *. I r- (23) rt 1 ify «IS nt) n J .f s 's •^•.^'(65) IS (63) i(Z6)*<^4 ‘tfr*)is^ / ,----------r - n A r!k/•>«%• • I I # f • • • • i.y • * f • * • ..**•* • * • • • . • ............ •.. • • • - ..!•••**•* r-r : : I I >3Ls »(29) IM •1^4 ^(62) I V J! ..................f I »• (30) rn s «oi II \ 153 i«6)'.-fi (»)n ••I___: ^■s K •«l J64) S >i •• \ Ol^''ii2)a (II)» 10 (10) o K7.J 22; _ /A*1 1 QCil> OfZl ni) \ (OD B ‘A (31) / • • •• » • (86) L**V • * I •(75) (60) ^7\ 9 U \ -(82) 1 • # rAAA / '^5Stj(*6) (85) (47) (lor ViX* .(TO) IS 'J> (71) '67, d- / / «• il- _u 17 ^—u'*o" L r B • o fLOO>^ ..... 'I 4> feXtsDseo jr^oo* c.cx>i^r;, Sioisii * • I ? • I • I j > . • ^ > I J ^__C- v;, V t -_^l ‘___. ~ I ~C- -+-■4------------------------ I I I •ri il- V_Ut.Aho.|vI Ki "- I-o // g»?:N dh X, V V X. » * f • • . * • V . • • i f . ' r i I . # ‘:,V ! *. • '•^1 • f * . •' ..ri '• ;> •; f,- I ii ■ I I I I I I I I l|- M »J - t. I I t r nr # 1563 *1 ■ - r>*.-It* ; 1* * H ■> !• • . V % • •• r Tt-Y/J ;Mi(Oc, V/>JtI v:'i ii i • I I I I : I -- i -I • SI Dt .£ Uiy ’/\]-/OKj '/) "r: I-o " \ V \ \X X U’ I • • ■• 'a* *• A « i*: «• • I • f • * * I I i:.; # • ^•. • • ■* J ^ «, •» t. I i h. • #• # * ^ r. » m « . • . I r ]■ V «>) '•TtM /Lc* X.7 '!=>'/tr vX DcoK • *•---------- EXJ^SeD !5»^00 ‘ SIDINJG <s.KKoe. I I I I I • I I I t V I—I- t, 1 N ‘A"-1-o iu*T> ti^ lOrKtcJ^ —s£: M^ !«^ jk ‘f; I- ►4’ J ■- 9' » tK.\STn'^G. 7 ^ 5td c^o>C ^ 5/l"^»C fLOiC h 15 / V / n ^cduoo ir'co^iu A-t|isiftTvv//o^ Co «i.i e Vo^c %iociC *flA fA>«T H Of cQuCft%.4 M%y tiMCy ^ n r'' -.............-.*r “ lx#’1 V1 e *• /•i-U»• •■r\»-• r - * 4* o 4 /f: f * • I : I.?' 4 %o % • eiMfVirf i«ii - ■* *1 •• -o ^Ttt ftTw^f ffccT.Mii tiUbw roo'tufca <3.«*spc.t>LKN ^ c ^-o'/ .* K <»• • 4 > ^■vt L. . -—-t-. ■•■<■■ J ^jfTrxjO CX»^T rooF V* k.t^O - * •s r I N-"^ f> ■ A f » •4I r • . •« • m • $.* . 0*J Ck<^&VW Cc>MC. FW??P^> '^‘^- ~i'.;^-- Aocn-r>c>M Tc .. aawij»r^u^^.TrKnwit^wtA^ja •f'i 15"^ »!cUV-et> ftvrX .riANitrTfCWAfc : H'\p.,PjooF • r " ■', •:'. <: *• • *v ‘' ! r/i .. • ^ I ' •*' ’ • • » ’. . 7 ! *. / \''*' '^ ^ r,.: . •. • -/-------------------H:7*-r——r— r.^ i; ‘ •. «i-<AC>G ' f • \, » ' ••• ; I. • .• • CT1 / 7 • * ^ fclo'^ASprfHT 5»4/Aic»Le^ Vj T*C» Ct>X. pLVWOoO /'AtC. tAff UC ! ■. /'\A -V /• •■ «. FoLLCD WfeKm^- &AOeC» rTT V 1 L ;). ^^^==5^ 5TA»?TeB s-r<»p •: OKip cp*e •; ' '• I - .‘.. . \ '^6 ^Aa.'^ pcLV-i 5^tef KocC '/t"^Mccr Coc<_-7 -I>J> fiatRGlAS^ l^il-. -p> zx(p wAtL ■—p ^L'fWOOO—) ____________jL '/t pcYy^^oo soffit (fcifor^ v/^X-s i'! ‘» W' fi.u.L-T R|C.^T . (p trxp^:,E.D smcct4 ' U,ifi iDiW<^ . S t i ‘ :i :,i f : • f r:';^ I *;.^r -L •! ■’ I • T' j. •, • I I • Z/,B /6' t-'i Kir*. ^liT • /'^l—r-AMC4o€. ^Voc ■ j-»o-CoURStS l^"BUocK' I IN)5l- -p j/l"Ce>»JC.fLooK-"^ - 5 cAVw e>Locl6.. Y.C.VCW' c»»;Kr.e. ^GftA.oe’ .,iOTjnF= I*. 2- ^?^l>^fc4:^C.CMer^^OOS » I 1 j o ^ ^1 *(--■'4 •yypicK^ w\u>, 5^cT>oto AbOlX><^^J fop::: ?^fs<.riRs ^c.tciir^:ufc/irtu * • .»•#•.. •CALf f'iOTt^A^^WOvlO •»LWAMrN »T .* . . ^ D»it U/(^/90 Mcvaco „KlC>^\T I o U^.V*\XLCi 1 r 1 ! :5SS ^ir'- 1-iS'V'* '"- • .... j \.** ' . »• »• * ■ • r»* 1-t ' 1 *' . 1 \ jJAlW --x • • ^ • » *•• t».. :^»?<» ■.*• ,CXr«*JO 6X»ST»M<3Lf<tc<= ‘yj. rr.FScuA siOfcw^v^.^ ' ;v- HiKMDKAil. •>> 1^ *■ “•■•'1'"'! ----Hi!^-- L.i', *.jrj,i-ti!-.J - - —j r ■'■ <»«t. TX*.»s,-re.o ,V«vT> -t_ I I • I I I ' I :i T ::i I > I i> t I, To • I " MM l %>• linn iHp r^oop m iiiinrirr I rc^<cAbc r *__^ I U----------------..4 I I I ▼1 II • • Ir-i 4 I ii I M ------------^ r «' ' 1. ^M . ^ I \ -•--------------................................. Lg.f X . E UXVAT’^ • «• * . ♦. • • r f^-S- »--r I J I •* « • - •« . I ? 1* * * fiCiL^.ce % • *. I ‘ t • '^ • . • t * / • • ••V \ • •# . Vi*. ' •• *• . f' . •* •' ’ - , . I . • % Adjacent Property Owners* AcJcnowledgement Form ^ I (we) of //fCi^xMo'd/ )> , -Vi [print address][print name{s}J have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at '^.1^471<(^T7'Tz^ also referred to as Land Use Application No I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confi-rm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvemeivt^ plans and that the proposed neighbor’s project or use .requires Counodl ^erty Owner ^e /' If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building a Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. J \ Adjacent Property Oimera* AcJcnowledgement Form (we) of HAv7Wv.,^v_: [print name(s)I^ ^[print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at /C^^S fJlniDCCrcf also referred to as Land Use Application No. . I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval CL / Property Owner 13 Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building s Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. •• #15 Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement Form I (we) f rvcK A^' (ciiTv/ P [print name(s)J Xcl aJ . [print name(s)J [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at f/b)(JJ6Qc^ /4^-t3^also referred to as Land Use Application No. _____. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of ♦•he improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use GC /Zd Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. « • • « #l56 \ \- I (we) Adjacent Property Oimers* Acknowledgement Form a /I /\fc /__________ of /?/^ (A/CC-y u-f _ tprint name (s)1 (print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at S'u/^L^aIso referred to as Land Use Application No. _ _ _. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am X (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval Property Owner Data Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building 6 Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ^.. #1563 -i % x I (we) Owners' Aclcnowledgemen^ Fora of /?cd print name{s)J [print address^ have reviewed the plans for the ^oposed improvement or proposed use of the i ^yalso referred to as Land Useproperty located at / j ^ , ------ -— Application No. _____. I (we) understand that in executing this aclcnowledgement, I (we) am (are) not as)ced to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plana and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Pr6pertyOwner DateDate Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building 5 Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. i #15 1 Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form I (we) ^L/t'.Cj of \ [print name(sT] ' [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at ^ y4o^^di\so referred to as Land Use Application No. _____. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement# I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use 6 ^ Date Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building 6 Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ^15 \ ^.. I (we) Adjacent Property Oimers* AcJcnowledgenent Fora i fZicH^uJ ^Jchn^c-)rsot m LO(yf~^ /h^ tprint name(s)J [print address] hflve reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at Si9S ’ ^//nufnnJ Aue also referred to as Land Use Application No. _____ I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the Improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. /^o/9^ Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building s Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. r • « Adjacent Property Owners* Ac)uiowledgement Form I (we) *J^r>..viAS h. [print name(s)J [print address.! have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at ^/o)UXjOci* referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this ac)cnowledgementr I (we) am (are) not as)ced to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. o c Property Owner r Date (a‘ Z.O Property Owner Date If you have any Information that may assist the City In the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building 6 Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement Form of E In-) uxJCcci AvI (we) Oc [print name(s)j ‘[print address] Aave reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 1^9^ E/n\UJCCCj referred to as Land Use Application No._ _ _. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor’s project or use requires Council approval. ''property C Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building 4 Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. #1563 $ • I (we) Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement Form ^ £6T //oyc^M-j of /'Y [print name(s)J [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 'f^A'yjco^cCcf Ae^so referred to as Land Ose Application Mo. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor’s project or use requires Council approval 'J 2, / - ?o Propeifty Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building fit Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. k J #156 Adjacent Property Oiraers* Acknowledgement Form I (we) hKd < b<^ Ugnrv [print n£une(s)J of j^fv [print address] h&V6 r0vlew6d the plans for the proposed Improveinent or proposed use of the property located at .<A^4klso referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acJcnowledgement» I (we) am (are) not as)ced to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. ~70 Ale/w^ TropertyOwner Q Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City In the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building s Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator Date:July 13, 1990 Subject: #1565 Richard Anderson, 3205 Crystal Bay Road After-the-Fact Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IC, Single family lakeshore residential, 1/2 acre, sewered Application - Request for after-the-fact hardcover variance for constructed deck and proposed future porches and decks List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey with Staff Sketches of Existing Hardcover Staff Hardcover Calculations & Sketch Applicant Submitted Hardcover Calculation Proposed Site Plan/Landscaping Plan Documentation Regarding After-the-Fact Deck Pertinent Facts - 1. In 1988, applicant constructed a deck to the side and front of his house, such deck being approximately 2.5' to 3' from the side lot line. Most of this is considered as a grade level deck by definition, no higher than the main ground floor level of the house and not requiring a handrail. Per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (C), such a deck is allowed to be constructed as near as 2' from any lot line. A portion of this deck (the northerly 12' along the lot line) exceeds 30" above grade, would require a railinq, and wouldneed to meet the 10' minimum setback. The deck also constitutes additional hardcover. The deck was constructed without a building permit. 2. On July 1, 1988, the applicant was advised that a hardcover variance application would be required, since the 75 —250' hardcover by applicant's calculations, exceeded the 25% limit. Additional information was requested for review at that time. 3. Applicant was sent additional notices after not responding to the variance notice, and eventually was issued a violation citation in July 1989. The applicant paid a $55.00 fine but failed to complete submittal of the required variance application until June 1990. Zoning File #1565 July 13, 1990 Page 2 4. 5. 6. This property is partially located within the City of Minnetonka Beach, hence hardcover calculations were based only on the area within the City of Orono. Hardcover on the property prior to construction of the most recent deck area (Item H of the Staff Hardcover Calculation), would have been 42.6% in the 75-250* zone. After deck construction the property as of March 1990 contained 47.3% in the 75-250* zone. Hardcover in the 0-75’ zone includes wooden walkway, stairs to the lake, and a gravel parking area, totaling 22.7%. The paved roadway is excluded from the hardcover calculations. Hardcover calculations submitted by the applicant with the application appear to be incomplete, hence for discussion purposes the staff ca 1 cu ?.ations should be used. On the preliminary landsc?*ping plan submitted, applicant’s landscape architect has used the staff base numbers and suggests that the following improvements to the property would yield a reduction to 31.7% in the 75-250* zone; a. Reduction in amount of sidewalks in lakeshore yard. b. c. d. Reduction in size of concrete patio adjacent to second house on property. Replacement of all plastic lined landscape areas with permeable fabric, elimination of rock beds where feas\ble. Reconstruction of rear patio/storage area adjacent to shed, with that area reverting to a non-hardcover status. e. Additional porches and deck amounting to 505 s.f. 7.. Applicant should be advised that the City Council currently considers landscape areas lined with plastic orpermeable fabric to be considered as hardcover. Also, there is some question as to whether the proposed gravel storage area would be considered as hardcover depending on the use of that area, the items stored in that area, and how the area is constructed. Inclusion of that area as hardcover would add about 480 s.f., resulting in as much as 36.3% hardcover. Discussion Applicant has paid the after-the-fact application fee for the variance request, and has stated his willingness to resolve the hardcover issues on the property in order to go ahead with his proposed landscaping work. Zoning File #1565 July 13, 1990 Page 3 The proposed screened porch in the landscape plan is located approximately 6* from the side lot line. A 10' setback would normally be required here, and staff would question whether there is any justification to allow a variance for this location. Staff would recommend that no such variance be granted. Regarding the portion of deck requiring a handrail, raising the grade at the edge of the deck would not be advisable since that would direct more runoff to the neighbors. Cutting the deck back to a point where it is less than 30" above grade would possibly be feasible. Note that any future proposal to put a railing on the deck in any location less than 10' from the lot line, would need a variance. As to hardcover on the property, the proposed landscape plan appears to decrease the intensity of hardcover on the property from the current levels, and could be cons.i ’ered a positive step. The erosion problems noted by applicant in his various letters stem not only from the fact that the house sits slightly downhill from another property to the rear, but are probably increased by the amount of hard surface areas on the property. This attempt to minimize erosion by creating hardcover areas, increases the risk of intensifying erosion in the remaining non-hardcovered areas. The landscape plan does not specify the use of retaining walls in the rear yard, hence staff would presume that this area is intended to be minimally graded and seeded or sodded to direct drainage around the house. Applicant should be required to provide a grading plan where changes in grade are proposed. The property does not currently contain a garage, and has access both from Crystal Bay Road at the front and from a privately maintained neighborhood driveway along the railroad tracks at the rear. While applicant has not proposed to construct a garage, Planning Commission may wish to consider where such a structure could be placed in the future and how that would affect hardcover on the property. The gravel parking area along Old Crystal Bay Road certainly is not a situation the City would prefer to continue permanently, given that it acts as a 50' wide curb cut. The second house on the property is not an issue in this application, although it is a uniquely located structure straddling the City boundaries. Applicant has never applied for guest house status of this structure. It does have plumbing. To staff's knowledge, this structure is currently being used as storage only. Applicant has been advised that use of that residence as a guest house technically .requires a conditional use permit from the City of Orono. Staff has not investigated whether similar rules would apply for Minnetonka Beach. Zoning File #1565 July 13, 1990 Page 4 Staff Reconnendation The Planning Commission should address the following issues in any recommendation regarding this after-the-fact variance request and future property improvement proposal: A. Does sufficient justification exist to grant an after- the-fact hardcover and setback variance to allow the existing deck (hardcover Item H) to remain? B. Should a variance be granted to allow the proposed screened porch to be less than 10* from the side lot line? C. In reworking the landscaping of the property, what percentage of hardcover on the property is appropriate? Staff would recommend that applicant be given a specific hardcover percentage to maintain, and would recommend that applicant's landscaper submit a revised plan for Planning Commission review at your next meeting, addressing all areas of concerns. Isv - V CITY OP ORONO - VMIIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION #1565 i CITY OF OROHQ OFFICE1 4*- f ! Site Address V • Wgi Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 1 ^00200000 rum-iL 3t'0f 00 ithiTTI^y- yuAuk- ^OrSi u-vVi iWl !i5: C6/2^y Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Phone (home) ) ) <:APPLICANT Name Phone (wor)c) Address ; ^^^22)y'CCA'f;fii'-\iL'* City; 1 _ Zip:I OWNER (if di^erent than applicant) Naune ^ f ___________ Phone (home) Phone (work) /; I Address:City:Zip; Date Property Acquired ^ (month/year) I (do) (po noy) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT OSE OPlPl^PERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential/^ Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $- - - - - - Describe request in ^ VARIANCES REQUIRED _ _ _ Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front _ _ Hardcover Side _ _ _ Rear) Other HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: LArV>l> 7^Yi«^)YL^ HLifL.D/L(^‘^AKT\AT\A^- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual pjepperty conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. S)cetc>ies or plans of floor and elevation views. 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional iterrs as may be requested by City staff. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above infomation has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete Initialed by Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct.to/the,best of his/her Jcnowledge. i3/^sk>Applicant's Signature r-'Date T OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ac)cowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Cpuncil members for purposes of investiga tion and verification fA Owner's Signature 7^ Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. . ■ I . T '■ ’ «• * :•' 4}v . ‘ ■■ • .• 5t-‘. • .. • • ■ c !• VAC OOC NO 2340950 , i /. . 'r V \ .#fr ‘ C 10-6 M» RUN DATE 06/ia/90 * : BATCH 005 PROP AODR OI«CR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 56 17-117-25 41 0008 00056 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED R i J DERSIE ROBERT D BERSIE 5159 NORTHVIEH RD HAYZATA MN 55591 HENNEPIN C0UT4TY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST 38 17-117-25 41 0009 03235 CRYSTAL BAY RO OUHAYNE L SCHIDILLA AflO HIFE DUHAYNE L SCMIBILLA 3235 CRYSTAL BAY RD HAYZATA MN 55391 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 4 38 17-117-25 41 0010 03215 CRYSTAL BAY RD TAJ SCHUPP TIMOTHY R A JEANETTE SCHUPP 3215 CRYSTAL BAY RD HAYZATA MN 55391 i PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR SB 17-117-25 41 0011 03205 CRYSTAL BAY RD R A ANDERSON A L R ANDERSON RICHARD ANDERSON BOX 135 MINNETONKA BEACH MN 55361 38 17-117-23 41 0012 03255 CRYSTAL BAY RO C HILLIAM HOLFE AND HIFE C HILLIAM HOLFE 3255 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 41 0014 03265 CRYSTAL BAY RD LEROY J ERGER A HIFE LEROY J ERGER 3265 CRYSTAL BAY RD HAYZATA MN 55391 PROP AODR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 17-117-23 41 0035 EDN STEARNS DONNA HUNTSBERGER 5128 OLD COUNTRY RD 15 HAYZATA MN 55391 82 16-117-23 32 0012 03150 NORTHVIEH RO G A J ANDERSON GERALD R ANDERSON 3150 NORTHVIEH RO HAYZATA MT4 55391 82 16-117-23 32 0013 03156 NORTHVIEH RD EOYTHE BROHN MISEL EOYTHE BROHN MISEL 3156 NORTHVIEH RO HAYZATA MT4 55391 I m PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR r 82 16-117-25 52 0014 00082 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO RICHARD A A LEESA K ANDERSON RICHARD A A LEESA K ANDERSON 5205 CRYSTAL BAY RD BOX 135 MINNETONKA BEACH MN 55361 TOTAL BATCH 005 00012 82 16-117-23 32 0054 00082 ADDRESS U4ASSIGNE0 RICHARD A A LEESA K ANDERSON RICHARD ANDERSOT4 BOX 135 Mir4NETONKA BEACH MN 55361 82 16-117-23 32 0060 03159 NORTHVIEH RD RAJ BERSIE ROBERT 0 BERSIE 3159 NORTHVIEH RO HAYZATA MT4 55391 ^565 I L; !<v!P c in; #15 o ^'v/tnM " 320^ ocvsr/iL Dor ' =’7V^2 ” :i:f. •* yr-ist>’-I t-f. //■> o^Lono " 7s!^-iiro‘ = £/0 -/. //-' ^cy rCe>A^ )f^ O r^o o r.. f • i*- • it t •. , *• :'iiJ 1- I*:.* i>Ml k. Uc r "7 ^ 2- •“ /4 ;^cfi/p:ArnC_^ c.^ftS^gT'o /Q>^ZC> :^ki.y^'j'■k'^ 7./^'2,S':r c. ftUDC-l:. 0/y'(^ C.’^LO<i4y/|f2>^^ 3^! A~l c <r p lOcoXiXr^ 5 <D Vx Ss 6 H^SeT (2S . ^ '7V4 /V £>E^C#L V2 . V ~ */^.Y>V &Vss X 1(0 ^ 2-^ • 2s -V/5 T le-t-p Vo / -C. X /ivc.3^o c. t/*A 2.* >< ^0 1^,-1 20 L ^4P /oytr 1^V X/d^ aJ .C. ^Lock.^SL^ f7^2-i)*26.7 c><X , l^tOC-feL s, /V ->*’ 28'*5 f 2/00 Hc»^s^ (70 X/^ •*-0® 0.p 2 ' >* S’O '/',—/oo (a-O- »c>t'^>^ > j t V *uj/>!t_<iu>'>w V >" ........^00 s 2Ttr^c»<Jc'^ 'z'T'*'/*d -r L«-/M-fci < • jt 2 ' ^ / .-f*I'lO //W -.f 2798 if. I . • ' i:- r ^ % ♦. ! • i •;1 65 ///‘7 ■*" S.'?'? S ’ ^?/2- S , "‘r /O/i-^ll - ^7, 3. #1 /4r^ O)^ 3*"2.0- o V<il2-V5S- _ . ^-*7S' H I/O ^rL-Pl i-v>iv* V^PO —, / /Cs> 1 - lo'y.\V I So ■- - )2-'=^l X.L Of 0~7f' - ~)'^'^^ C<fiz 7oca ~h. ?2oArb = s'V-i-r' /■z-ll /‘B'iz^ = 2^2..*> V= ■ 'SOO '• /o<5 |M . ; ,.y7"£?yvA.. ^I>ec<c.^ wac Si/ut ;f9» ^ V*'*’'/** '•• -• •.•**•. J \ 0 i," '*b» ■•• * -• • -1 • * '.. •*X • % • *. f •,* < M ^ _i, "O I'bc&iefi-. - Ss-Cir" cn^zr*t^ Kcfiri^ ^ ^ ^ yU2.^ " -i* <4t2€A /‘^i \ ^0-1^ - -^7 T' ^CD ' ■* 28 -'^2.')*' -/o loi L^ssr«To ~:rDo /opoi -S/^“ /^/ I I ^ ri... -: /'>7€-' 2-rOro') ^5^s .T — • •*‘^- ■ • ^ > •« ■ ■•. . ^ •.■* V •• '- rf- H • • /..1 • •*'• * .*;' .• • ' ,. V,'V*«.*•• f • « ' .^ • • 4' • • -y- ■ « . t ! .HARDCOVER CALCULATION WO SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-7 Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone B Existing Hardcover in ! A. Housf Zone Xw ^ w LENGTHn X WIDTH i4-^445. S < X4 •• X X 3 m Garage XW i r.Hr TVPWAY X 1 1 L-?X 1 12- CcnnC. Ictt 0. «S+gSSkbK 1?X . 3iZ^ X 5,^ 1 vw<^ —------------ p-s"X .iLs 4z> E.^ATIO/ X ,^5 \Jou-Ai; — ■« F.Landscape X S < AREAS UNDERLAIN BY X ,<% PLASTIC SHEETING X _< X .S • A G. Other X _3 S ll,g|2.So S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ^. r . S.F. S. r I S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.B X 100 ivV l-VycUli. pV^poiC<L rd&vA pn^^TVnr- Pk<^ ^JTATVlS ^:2Z- SS. 7- I'Sa ^ -) - a9 ^ -/o - 89 7-Zo - 8^ / S.T- i//^54AT70AJ 6^;i-^>//oC. /arij—T". (7'WiV7^'J * ' •o ^ % l^fc».I V t t r •i I CL I’rA'T^of^ CITY OF QRONOD ii May 25^ 1990 CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66*Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323 • Municipal OfGces On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka #15 Richard Anderson 3205 Crystal Bay Road P.O. Box 135 Minnetonka Beach, MN 55361 Dear Mr. Anderson: j^Qtter is to follow~up our discussions on May 25, 1990 regarding your proposed landscape plan and additions. As we discussed, the decrease in hardcover would appear to be a positive improvement to the property. In order to make your variance application complete^ the following additional items must be submitted: 1. Preliminary plans and elevation views of the proposed porch, screened porch and deck additions. 2. Certified property owners list of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from the Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603 Government Center, 348-3271). 3. Plat map (obtained with the property owrers list). 4. Variance application base fee of $1/5.00, after—the—facu application fee of $175.00, total fee of $350.00. Please submit the above items to us by noon on Friday, June 22, 1990. Your application would then be scheduled for the July lot Planning Commission meeting, with Council action scheduled for August 6th. Please contact me at 473-7357 if you have any questions. cc: Jeanne Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator Lyle Oman I Senior Building Inspector MPG/lsv BUILDING a ZONING - 47J.73S7 ASSESSING administration a HNANCE - 473-7358 FAX-4734)510 PUBLIC WORK.S - 47>7359 CITY OF ORONOD CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323•Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka May 25, 1990 Richard Anderson 3205 Crystal Bay Road P.O. Box 135 Minnetonka Beach, MN 5536 Dear Mr. Anderson: This letter is to follow-up our discussions on May 25, 1990 regarding your proposed landscape plan and additions. As we discussed, the 'decrease in hardcover would appear to be a positive improvement to the property. In order to make your variance application complete, the following additional items must be submitted: 1. Preliminary plans and elevation views of the proposed porch, screened porch and deck additions. 2. Certified property owners list of owners within 150' (you must obtain'this list from* the Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603 Government Center, 348-3271). 3. Plat map (obtained with the property owners list). 4. Variance application base fee of $175.00, after-the-fact application fee of $175.00, total fee of $350.00. Please submit the above items to us by noon on Friday, June 22, 1990. Your application would then be scheduled for the July loth Planning Commission meeting, with Council action scheduled for August 6th. Please contact me at 473-7357 if you have any questions. Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator CCS Jeanne Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Lyle Oman, Senior Building Inspector MPG/lsv BUILDING A ZONING - 47M357 ASStSSlNG ADMIMSIRMION A UNANUF. - 473-735* FAX - 4734WI0 PUBLIC WORKS - 473*735'» fiV* » A.D.I.I ANDERSON DESIGN SERVICES; PUNNINC/CRAPHICS J \ •Landscape Planning & Design •Deck Design •Porch & Sunspace Design •Pool Layout Studio Mailing Address: Postal Box 5264 Minnetonka. Minnesota 5534 j (612) 931-9992 LETTER April 25. 1990 Rich & Leesa Anderson 3205 Crystal Bay Road Orono, MN 55391 Dear Rich and Leesa. This is to confirm our arrangements for my landscape design services After site measurement, I will be laying out your property to begin the landscape master plan. I should be able to have schematic designs ready to review with you sometime around the first week of May. If those meet your approval, we should submit the concepts to the City of Orono for approval Once that is accomplished, final design layout will take about two weeks or so. Thanks again and looking forward to working with you. TA/kwa i CITYof ORONO crnr OF ORONOy M Post Office Box 66* Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 • Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka March 30/ 1990 Richard Anderson 3205 Crystal Bay Road p,0. Box 135 Minnetonka Beach/ MN #15 55361 Re: Building Permit/Variance Request Dear Mr. Anderson: Thank you for your attention to starting the process for obtaining building permits for the existing deck (after-the-fact) and additional work you propose. Lyle and I visited the site on March 30th and scrutinized your hardcover/ enabling me to draw the attached hardcover map. Your property is definitely in excess of the hardcover allowance/ and/ as we had previously discussed/ a hardcover variance for the existing deck and proposed additional work appears necessary. In your letter, you suggest that you will be "reworking various portions of the property tc help the drainage problem. I would note that many of the areas you propose to rework are currently hardcovered bv virtue of containing rock or gravel oyer plastic sheeting. It 'is likely that any Planning Commission recommendation for approval of the existing deck and proposed screen porch and sun room, would be in exchange for some serious removals of existing hardcover to reduce your overall percentage. You mention that erosion is a prime concern because of so much water flowing past your house. This severe runoff is only made worse by all the existing hard surface on the property, which decreases the area where runoff can soak into the ground. A reduction of hard surface coupled with some terracing and site regrading, could alleviate many of the problems. In order for us to proceed with the variance application, you must provide the following: 1. Certified property owners list of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from the Hei.nepin County Department of Finance, A—603 Govt Center, ‘*48 — 3271 ). BtiLDING & ZOM.Nf; - 473-7357 ASSESSING ADMIMSm\TION 4 HN.\NCE - 473-7358 FAX -4734)510 »U HI 1C \»OKK> - 473-7359 i Richard Anderson 3205 Crystal Bay Road March 30, 1990 Pace 2 of 2 2, Plat map (obtained with the property owners list). Construction plans for the existing deck, and for the (-^^oposed sun room and screened porch. 4. The Planning Commission will likely expect to see a detailed plan of how you propose to "rework" the property (i.e. they will expect to see which items of hardcover you propose to remove, and where you intend to regrade or place new retaining walls. I would recommend that you consider hiring a landscape architect to advise you, and perhaps even to draw a comprehensive plan for your property that will address the problems you have brought up in your letter.) 5. Variance application base fee of S175.00, after-the—fact application fee $175.00, total fee $350.00. If the five items noted above are submitted to us by noon on Friday, April 27th, your application could be submitted to the Planning Commission on May 21st, with possible final Council action on June 11th. Please contact me at 473-7357 if you wish to discuss any of the above. Asst Planning s Zoning Administrator MPG/tln Enclosure - Hardcover Drawing & Calculations cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Lyle Oman, Senior Building Inspector if RICHARD ANDERSON 3205 CRYSTAL BAY RD. WAYZATA, MN. 55391 DEAR LYLE; i JL oo I HAVE ENCLOSED A SURVEY MAP WITH THE MAJOR HARDCOVER AREAS HIGHLIGHTED. I WOULD LIKE TO GET THIS APPROVED WITHOUT JUMPING THROUGH THE HOOPS. I REALIZE THAT THERE SEEMS TO BE SOME MAJOR CONCERNS ABOUT HARDCOVER AREAS AROUND THE LAKE AND I TOO AM CON CERNED ABOUT RUNOFF. QUITE HONESTLY, THE MAIN REASON I BUILT THIS DECK IN QUESTION, WAS BECAUSE THE LAND AROUND MY FOUNDATION WAS ACTUALLY ERODING AWAY. I REALLY GOT CONCERNED AFTER THE HUGE RAIN TOOK OUT THE FRONT ROAD AND HAD VISIONS OF MY FOUNDATION DOING THE SAME AS THERE WAS A RIVER FLOWING AROUND MYFOUNDATION. WHEN I DID MY ADDITION, I TOOK OUT A CONCRETE DECK THAT WAS THERE IN THE SAME PLACE I PUT UP THE WOOD DECK. OBVIOUSLY, A WOOD SLAT DECK IS BETTER THAN A CONCRETE SLAB AS FAR AS WATER FLOW IS CONCERNED. THERE WASN'T ANY PROBLEM WITH ME REPLACING THE FRONT DECK (CONCRETE) WITH WOOD WHEN I GOT DONE WITH MY ADDITION SO I ASSUMED THE SAME COULD BE DONE ON THE SIDE. I KNOW I SLOWED THE RUNOFF FROM MY ROOF CONSIDERABLY. THERE ISN’T ANY PLASTIC UNDER THE DECK EITHER. I AM STILL CONCERNED WITH THE ADDITIONAL RUNOFF FROM THE BACK ROAD AREA. WITH THE RAINS OF THE LAST FEW DAYS, I HAVE MAJOR EROSION RIVERS GOING THRU MY SOIL RIGHT NOW. SOMETHING SHOULD BE DONE IN MY BACK YARD, BUT QUITE HONESTLY, I DON'T DARE DO ANY LANDSCAPING FOR FEAR OF HARD COVER PROBLEMS. NOT ONLY IS THE LAND ERODING, BUT MY TREE ROOTS ARE BECOMING MORE AND MORE PROMINENT. WHEN I DID MY ADDITION, I TOOK UP ALL THE CONCRETE SLAB WORK THAT WAS BACK THERE WITH THE IDEA OF REPLACING WITH SOME WOOD LOW LEVEL DECKS. I HAVE NOT DONE THAT YET BUT LIKE THE O.K. TO PROCEED WITH THOSE IDEAS. I UNDERSTAND YOUR POSITION WITH HAVING TO DO EVERYTHING BY THE BOOK, BUT PLEASE BE SENSITIVE TO MY NEEDS OF DOING WHAT I HAVE TO DO TO PROTECT AND BEAUTIFY MY PROPERTY. I BELIEVE I AM AND HAVE BEEN IN THE PAST SENSITIVE TO YOUR NEEDS (CITY OF ORONO). I REALIZE THAT THERE IS SOME CONCERN WITH THE FACT THAT I HAVE TWO HOUSES HERE, BUT, I HAVE NO INTENTIONS OF DOING ANY RENTING NOW OR IN THE FUTURE. IN THE PAST I HAVE WORKED WITH THE CITY WHEN THE SEWER WAS GOING IN. YOU NEEDED AN EASEMENT ON THE SAILORS WORLD PROPERTY AT THE LAST MINUTE AND WE GAVE YOU THAT EASEMENT IN GOOD FAITH SO YOUR PROJECT COULD GO ON AS SCHEDULE. WE WERE SUPPOSE TO GET ON APPRAISAL ON THE PIECE OF PROPERTY BY YO’'R APPRAISER AND GET PAYMENT FOR THAT PERMANENT EASEMENT. WE STILL HAVEN'T RECIEVED ANY PAYMENT, SO I GUESS WE GAVE YOU THE PROPERTY. AND I THINK WE WERE PRETTY PATIENT WITH THE FRONT ROAD INCIDENT. I'M SURE YOU MIGHT TAKE ISSUE WITH THAT BUT TO WAIT TWO YEARS FOR A PROJECT THAT TOOK THE CONTRACTOR TWO DAYS TO DO, IS BEING PRE TY PATIENT. I HAVE GOTTEN PLENTY OF COOPERATION Wi'iH YOU IN THE PAST, SO DON’T GET ME WRONG THAT I DON'T ENJOY LIVING IN THE CITY OF ORONO AND WORKING WITH “^HE CITY. ALL I WANT TO DO, IS GET MY PROPERTY UP TO DATE, SO PLEASE WORK WITH ME. SINCERELY, CITY OF QRONO CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66 •Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 • Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka February 21, 1990 Richard Anderson 3205 Crystal Bay Road P.O. Box 135 Minnetonka Beach, MN 55361 Re: Deck Construction at 3205 Crystal Bay Road Dear Mr. Anderson: :t has come to the attention of this department that you apoeared in court on September 12, 1989 regarding a citation issued to you for building a deck without a building pe.mit. . plead guilty and paid a S55.00 fine. '^his letter is to inforp you that payment of this fine in no way makes your deck a legal structure. You are ‘!^g\"rvou obtain a building permit and meet all applicable codes i-^ wish to keep the deck. An application with the t^tred submittals must be provided to the City before Karch 2, 1.90. If this deadline is not net the City will again issue citations and the prosecuting attorney will be instructec >.0 resolve this issue before fines are paid and the case is closed. If you have any questions, feel free to contact anyone in «-» Building & Zoning Department. Sincerely, Lvle Oman, Senior Building Inspector LO/tlnEnclosure - Permit and Variance Applications cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Bruce Vang, Building Inspector BLILDING 4 ZOMNCJ - 473-7JS7 ASSESSI.SG AD-MIMSTR-VTION 4 HNANCE - 473.735? »AX - 473.<>5H» I’l BIIC WORKS - 473-7359 To: From 3205 Crystal Bay Road» Defendant Richard Anderson Lyle Oman, Senior Building Inspector Date: January 2, 1990 Subject: Building Without a Permit 7/20/89 Citation issued. City Attorney finds no record. File to be sent to the City Attorney on 1/2/90. > L_^ HENNEPIN COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT DISPOSITION SUMMARY CITY OF ORONO TO: FROM: DATE: City Administrator Chief of Police Brian w. Ohm/^ Prosecuting Attorney September 19, 1989 ' >rr-b ‘ • ) DEFENDANT: Richard Anderson OFFENSE(S): Work without building permit DATE OF OFFENSE: July 20, 1989 ARRESTING OFFICER: Lyle Oman CONTROL NO.: SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS: This matter came on for an Arraignment on September 12, 1989. pursuant to negotiations with the defendant, the defendant agreed to plead guilty to the charge. DISPOSITION: UDon a plea of guilty to the work without building permit charge. Judge James D. Rogers sentenced the defendant to a $55.00 fine. ZNJC1192/1 %* • ‘ • ‘ iL L DEAR LYLE: THIS IS IN REPLY TO YOUR LETTER DATED JULY 10, 1989. AS YOU REMEM BER, I CAME INTO YOUR OFFICE AND WE DISCUSSED THIS MATTER OF HARD COVER AND AN AFTER THE FACT BUILDING PERMIT. I DON'T HAVE THE EXACT DATE BUT IT WAS SOMEWHERE NEAR THE END OF APRIL. AT THAT TIME WE TALKED ABOUT GETTING A MASTER PLAN OF WHAT WE WANTED TO DO AS FAR AS LANDSCAPING THE ENTIRE PROPERTY. I HAVE TALKED TO TWO DIFFERENT FIRMS ABOUT DOING THAT FOR ME. I RULED OUT ONE OF THEM BECAUSE OP PRICE AND AM CURRENTLY WORKING ON TRYING TO GET BRIAN BUTTERFIELD OUT HERE TO DO IT FOR ME. BRIAN, UNFORTUNATELY, IS VERY BUSY AND IT IS HARD FOR HIM TO GET OVER HERE. I WILL CONTINUE TO PURSUE GETTING A MASTER PLAN THAT WE CAN WORK FROM SO PLEASE BE PAliENT. AFTER ALL, I'VE ONLY CONSTRUCTED THE DECK TO MINIMIZE THE RUNOFF AND EROSION FACTOR THAT WAS HAPPENING TO MY PROPERTY. THANK YOU FOR YfUR PATIENCE. SINCERELY, RICH '« . ‘I.; .* • i ““•'“'“«,ro.Mcn.i«>««o.SS®H~ 3893.044133 ^ ■m *«• ••gt^tauaanv • • • 0 o M 0 s s3__5J. nATgO^ B»HTH MO ’ OAY 1 I Hg QHT i^xTio^QgggNjr lo -i'^ g V \ vfHiCLE LtCgNSt STATE ; ', ••• • »^**. • * ^ t •* - • * •••••.*•* T1ME__________ 0 ^ 3 Q- METtH r«u TEA#< 1 1 MAKE t • 1 i ' :■ 1 I • I * • • • • , * • • * ' * ■ . . ___-—.-r-T-r-n 1 - — — ►—i ■ i ^ - i V cl '.S. rTt '• ■*>* '^^''* • ■ ‘ ♦ ! I 5 'e «^1, _j .tpr't I -111|-i -i~1- I I I - I J- ~'t^ ■ .It — I— •-r:“rn r- i —i " I'”'! !i • •y ‘.'V •-•... A, .—U-L -|-|-r|___ ft .-^ ,.•-• A—■ ■ * <• i«r • x'm, ^ •# • ••• .? • ..*»» • •%!** *• •#.*-•• •»■ 1 L<CITY OF ORONa CITYof ORONO Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323• Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka July 10, 1989 Richard Anderson 3205 Crystal Bay Road Box 135 Minnetonka Beach, MN 55361 Re: Deck built without a permit at 3205 Crystal Bay Road Dear Mr. Anderson: Or February 1, 1989 the City again informed you that there was some inforniation missing in an after-the-fact a deck constructed on your property without a building permit. Thes0 it6ins are as follows: 1. Site improvement plan (driveways/landscaping/sidewalks decks/etc.). 2. Specific buildings plans (2 sets required) showing exterior elevations and details and sections. 3. Variance (hardcover) application required - contact the Zoning Department immediately at 473-7357. The above noted items must i.r wil!°be fiferred uoThe prosecuting attorney for further legal action. If you have any questions feel free to contact the Building & Zoning Department. Sincerely# Lyle Oman, Field Inspector ccf^^Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & ?°”^"^-^^^"^fHm?^istrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Thomas J. Jacobs, Building 6 Fire Inspector BUILDING k ZONING - 473-7337 assessing administration a FINANCE - 473-7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 - .V- . iiM-CITYof ORONO Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323•Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka July 10, 1989 Richard Anderson 3205 Crystal Bay Road Box 135 Minnetonka Beach, MN 55361 Re: Deck built without a permit at 3205 Crystal Bay Road Dear Mr. Anderson: On February 1, 1989 the City again informed you that there was some information missing in an after-the-fact application for a deck constructed on your property without a building permit. These items are as follows: 1. Site improvement plan (driveways/landscaping/sidewalks decks/etc.). 2. Specific buildings plans (2 sets required) showing exterior elevations and details and sections. 3. Variance (hardcover) application required - contact the Zoning Department immediately at 473-7357. The above noted items must be received by the City before July 19, 1989 or citations will be issued and the matter will be referred to the prosecuting attorney for further legal action. If you have any questions feel free to contact the Building & Zoning Department. Sincerely, Lyle Oman, Field Inspector LO/tln cc; Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoi.ing Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Thomas J. Jacobs, Ruilding 6 Fire Inspector BL'ILDIN('.A ZONING - 47J 7J5 7 ASSESSING ADMINISIKAIION A FINANCI 47J 7J5H Pt BLK HORKS - 473-73S9 CITY OF QROMaI M CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, MinnesoU 55323• Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetz>:ika Febryary 1# 1989 Richard Anderson 3205 Crystal Bay Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Re: Deck Construction at 3205 Crystal Bay Road, Orono Dear Mr. Anderson: On June 22, 1988, the Building & Zoning Department received you acclication for an after-the-fact building permit. On July 1st, you wer notifed that the application was incomplete and the following informatic was required: Site Improvement Plan (driveways/landscaping/sidewalks/decks/etc.) Specific Building Plans (2 sets required): Exterior Elevations Details & Sections Variance Application Required (hardcover and setback) Your failure to provide the required submittals ^®»ves us n alternative but to initiate legal proceedings against you. Action will until February 13, 1989. If at that time you have failed t comply, citations will be issued and the matter attorney for further legal action. I you have any questions or if you hav a proble^m meeting this deadline, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Lyre Oman, Field Inspector. LO/tln Enclosure - Variance Application cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building s Zoning _ Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator Thomas J. Jacobs, Building s Fire Inspector BUILDING a ZONING - 473-7 J57 assessing administration * FINANCE - 473-7338 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7339 /"= yo O ■ / *7^' / j f ■ / c'-'-' 7r- e-sro' A fi»4 - zo. Yvex.a ^ > /«).a /.^/ >^ //^7 ^^ 1^ 17- 5'. f ;ci J S-./ X/y.iT2^ 7./X-^s*r- ,'^./ ^0. I • 1 the ;he shore ! ?!ortheast- firsi relictions T|^ y^oi ~’0 • “** "•' ** * ——•—“ * —— ’ nt tr.e poir.t ^ L'r.o Great Nprtnerr. Line between Lots' 1 and 2 In said Block 2, jinj- lino between s'lid Lots 1 ard 2 nrd sure Lertini; rifht at an artllo of H2^55' from last- rthebsterl/ doflcctlnf: ripht at an an^lc of 3 actvLil point of becinnin^ of the tract of l„nd betirj'.ir.t Morthoastorly on the extension of said snt r.ni'.n*J.:r corner; thence cor.tinuint Nertneact- itted street now Vacated which abuts upon thj pfri t”3 intersection of r'^rt«rUr<' of ^ • ^ C.31 = -- lu. - S*7. - = 2-7 U " ’ll ^ Z(o - C-3 m r t • A ^r^^oxvT . dRQNCC CITY of ORON' Post Offic* Box 66*Crysul Bay. Minnesota 55323 • Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka July If 1988 Richard Anderson 3205 Crystal Bay Road Box 135 Minnetonka Beach# MN 55361 Re: Proposed Deck at 3205 Crystal Bay Road# Orono 9 Dear Mr. Anderson: The Building S Zoning Departaent is in receipt of your an after-the-fa?t building permit, «?“r?hat the followingJune 22, 1988. A review of the application finds that the information needed for review is missing: Site Improvement Plan (driveways/landscaping/sidewalks/decks/etc.) Specific Building Plans (2 sets required): Exterior Elevations Details and Sections variance Application Required - Contact Zoning Department Immediately 473-7357 (hardcover variance) Review of your application will not received. Failure to submit required i^ems immediat y y citations being issued. Please contact the Building s Zoning Department at 4T3-7357 if you have any questions. •* - Total Fee: $ CITY OF ORONO ~ BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Date Received:_ _ __ _ _ Date Approved;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Permit#:_ _ _ _ Project#:, Building be filled out completely and signed 2 sets of const~*jction plans to include the following:2. a) b) c) d) CertificVte of'Vurv'ey with"''location of existing and proposed Floor plans; Footing and foundation plan; Elevations (of all sides); Wall sections and cross sections; Details - stairs and any special connections 3.structures including hardcover calculations and grading and drainage plans as required. Energy calculations - form provided. ABOVB^ INFORMATIO iT BE^ SOBMITICT IN FULL BEFORE PLAN REVIEW WILL 4. 5. THE APPLICANT IS: (circle one) .or CONTRACTOR JOB SITE ADDRESS: - - - - - - - ZIP 55391 PROPERTY IDENTIWCATION NO. : 1 ^ \ NAME OF OWNER:KJ (work) PHONE:(home) CONTRACTOR: CITY; f-A-TVjLfe^yy. ZIP; PHONE: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ MAILING ADDRESS: ARCHITECT:_ _ _ _ CITY:ZIP: PH' C STORIES:_ _ _ SQ. FEET OF EACH FLOOR:__ _ _ NO. OF BEDROOMS: GARAGE STALLS: ATT.DET. jr I . *‘JC ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION VALUATION (excluding land): $------— » • f !ti VIMW r 'V! CITY of ORONO Post Office Fiox 66*Crystal Bay, Minnesota 5532.'1«Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka DATA PRIVACY APVljSORY In accordance with M.S. 15.165, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under M.S. 15.165 to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name, and date of birth are required to process this application or permit. (I \i'.V- D' it'-AJ First 0y> Middle Address City ' lUo state ... Zip Phone I understand my ^ghts as stated above. n sT^hature BUILDING A ZONING - 473 7357 • ASSESSING a DMIMSTR a TION a finance - 473 7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 473*7359 • 4 To;Planning Coirani««sion Chairman Kelley Orono Plannii.j Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:July 1C, 1990 Subject: #1566 Dr. & Mrs. Thomas Regnier, 1205 Elmwood Avenue Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IB, Single l.imily lakeshore residential, 1 acre, sewered Application - Request for side street setback variance to construct additions to existing residence List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Proposed Site Plan Elevation Views Hardcover Calculations Pertinent Pacts - 1. The existing house is on a corner lot at a jog in Elmwood Avenue. The existing house is 6.5 ' from the north lot line, which would be considered a side street lot line in this case, normally requiring a 35' setback. The existing attached garage is 5.3 ' from the east lot line. 2. Applicants propose to construct an addition to the west side of the house, extending the existing north line of the house 6.5' from the lot line. Additionally, a second story addition is proposed to complete the existing partial second story, also being as near as 6.5' to the north side lot line. 3. Existing 75-250' hardcover is 23.19%. In conjuction with the additions, applicants propose to remove enough existing retaining wall and concrete sidewalk hardcover to maintain hardcover at or below the 25% limit. 4. Existing lot coverage by structures is 12.8%. With the proposed addition, lot coverage will be 14.8%, meeting the 15% limit. Discussion This lot is by definition a corner lot, and the defined front lot line would be the east lot line, with the side street Zoning File #1566 July 10, 1990 Page 2 lot line being the north lot line. In the LR-IB zone, the required side street lot line setback is 35'. The existing house is approximately 10' from the paved driving surface of Elmwood Avenue on the north side of the house, and the addition will similarly be approximately 10 or more feet from that road. Absent the need for hardcover or lot coverage variances, this lot is still limited by the location of the existing house so near the roadway. Traffic heading southward then eastward along Elmwood might perceive this house after additions as substantially increasing in bulk near the traveled roadway, although there is some minimal existing vegetative screening in that area. Because neighboring adjacent lakeshore residences are much nearer the lake than the existing house or proposed additions, there is no average setback encroachment. Staff Reconaendatlon Answering the following questions should help the Planning Commission in determining an appropriate recommendation for the proposed variance request: 1. Will the completion of the second story above an existing substandard street setback increase the visual density in the neighborhood? 2. Will the additional structure located 6.5' from the side street lot line, have a detrimental impact on the neighborhood? 3. Can the proposed westerly addition be constructed at a location further from the side street lot line, or is the existing house location sufficient justification for allowing that addition as proposed? Isv !• CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATIOl Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) 1 PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ciry or nccrrc Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) rni 17K m # jrtvTro i^truAiik* 'i'iliY'' ^ _ TT Jl l.* Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Phone (home) ^”72' **7 Name DR k MRS THOMAS DAVID REGNIER 120& Elmwood Avenue ORONO. MINNESOTA 55364 Phone (work) Address:. City:Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT OSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property LH-IB Residential Ot.ier (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: fiflOhik eu>A>AJgOP Afve So A dd <T>on J \N\m eViWriiO^ ffaLSg VARIANCES REQOIRED • i Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover , 1 Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) I 4 Other HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical^difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; Si? * V^OU\jQ /T UMggAU)<>ri ^ AtO A-COi*rioM ■■■ - DESCRIPTION OP ONUSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements; 2. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Slcetches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11* X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above inforaation has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Jcnowledge. > oVOApplicant's Signature-^^ % Date (b • ^ OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature ■iLyw—^ Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. • A A • ^ •*• •« - > - . - - . . r>v ^•i^fTT -**•.-1 - -i-i-T-r-r-r----\ '.'•< # W t/4% * • < • • * • • » \ ' >f'*^.ir* V c Jvl). I I • I I I * i fc- - - -i - -' •^••l...l...V;J/ • I • I I I I • • ' I I I ^ • T * i I *^> I I I • I I I I" I • ♦ - r - ----- ‘ *•*»*•** -^ * : , « 1 I I : I I II I V^Jvi till O I I I I I I I I I I • N I > A • 4 • IL .W iTT-r ——“-i-T-T*T-r-r*i-------- I I I I * *I A » I I I I I r-**t"** ••*f***•/I ^ I • I I I I I * I • I , , , , , , ^.-4--I I V » RUN DATE 04/21/90 1? BATCH 001 PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR SB 07-117-23 14 0014 OOOSa ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNFY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPLRnr OWNERS LIST 38 07-117-2S 14 0030 01179 ELMWOOD AVE B E GARLOCK ARK GARLOCK BRUCE GARLOCK 1179 ELMWOOD AVE FKXJT4D HT4 55364 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 1 38 07-117-23 14 0033 01180 ELMWOOD AVE J N LAMBRECHT ET AL JON W LAMBRECHT 1160 ELMWOOD AVE M0Ut4D MN 55364 PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 07-117-23 14 0034 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF ORONO CONVEYED 2/8/82 ST DEED 161147 38 07-117-23 14 0054 01179 NORTH ARM OR NAN ROCKVAM NORMAN A r4Af4CY ROCKVAM 1179 NORTH ARM DRIVE M0Ut4D m 55364 38 07-117-23 01199 ELK J A E HARVEY J SCOT HARVEY 1199 ELKWOOO H0Ur4D MN 55364 14 0059 AVE 0 2 J TV! PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OKtIER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 07-117-23 14 0060 01149 NORTH ARM DR GARY E BEITO ETAL GARY A ROSALIE BEITO 1169 N ARM DR MOUND MN 55344 38 07-117-23 41 0315 01285 NORTH ARM DR M B HENRY A L M HENRY MICHAEL B A LISA M 1285 NORTH ARM DR MOUND m 55364 38 07-117-23 41 0018 01295 ELMWOOD AVE J A DENZEL AML DENZEL JEROrtt A MAURENE L DENZEL 1295 ELMWOOD AVE M0UK8) m 55364 38 07-117-23 41 0013 01205 NORTH ARM OR PAUL R SKAGERBERG PAUL R SKAGERBERG 1205 r40RTH ARM DR MOUIO MI4 55364 38 07-117-23 41 0014 01205 ELMWOOD AVE TAJ REGNIER THOMAS D A JAK4E REGt4IER 1205 ELMWOOD AVE MOUND Kt4 55364 38 07-117-23 41 0088 01304 ELr^lOOD AVE RICHARD J JOHNSON ET AL RICHARD J JOHrC^ON 1304 ELMWOOD M0Ur40 MN 55364 38 07-117-23 41 0014 01245 NORTH ARM DR ROBERT 6 HOVLANO GEORGE HOVLANO 1285 NO ARM DR MOUTiO MN 55364 38 07-117-23 41 0017 01265 ELMWOOD AVE JOHN A PERKINS JR ETAL JOHN PERKINS 1265 ELMWOOD AV M0UT4D MT4 55364 TOTAL BATCH 001 00014 #15 ' ^ k '- ■ //(■' t cT. HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) (0"Z5^ Existing Hardcover in Zone A. House 3. Garage c. Driveway D.. Sidewalk _ /C. r/r E. Patio/ 3eck F.Landscape AREAS underlain 3Y PLASTIC. SHEETING G, O ther X X X X X X X LENGTH WIDTH _____. X________ o.. Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone 3/2322.y _-r 3 0-5QQ' 500-1000' S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 23^ y S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F S.F. __ S.F. S.F 22. y S.F. ?/<f S.F. X 100 0, yo B % j r/< HARDCOVER CALCULATIOH WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' E xisting Hardcover in Zone ^ • A. ■ House length 30,2.X n.3 . X Zr-’TtS • /5. 2 3. GTffiAflE- ?, O X n,s C. 8«4V€^^A¥-__/0.3 V D.. Sl-DEWALK- E. Patio / D eck 23. Z /9. S X X > ___ X WIDTH 3-^ 9. 9 10.3 r. / V. 5 6^2. /^.3 o. sF. Landscape ______ii— x AREAS _________ZJ_ X o-v. PLASTIC Z,/ V <27.^7 SHEETING y2. X, .2 ^.l'7 G. Other --------x------------------- Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone Tl yy<^y. 3 -[11 ?00^' ■ C?t. 7 S.F. 2s%7 S.F. /2/. ^ • • S.F. • S.F. • *AO.?S.F. €0.?S.F. —S.F. S.F. S.F. J:r^S.F. a S.F. ♦m.y S.F. /<r S.F. • S.F. = /V. / 2<r- / S.F. a S.F. mm.2ZJ S.F. Z‘f(^V.3 S.F. /•e ^S.F. X 100=J9 B /I /{y / HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' Existing Hardcover in Zone 250-500 'J 500-1000' A. 3. Garage E.^ATIO/ Deck F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY , . PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other House 7. / _ x_ LENGTH WIDTH y o. 3 . X X _ c. Driveway x '7 /*'/ y^iL X D.. Sidewalk ^ X X X X Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone (^19-40^ f S.F. fpSigf • N t I ^.s IB S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. / Z ($* S.F. V • • • _ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ^3 V-..S.F. S.F.B B ^oo X 100 72.1 •« ••••• • .....J^_cc< j^Lrx /o,i 2 X /O* 3: ■■ /vy /v^ 21 TO:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Pros: Date: Subject: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator July 12, 1990 #1567 Robert H. Powell, Jr., 2916 Casco Point Road Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IC, Single family lakeshore residential, 1/2 acre, sewered Application - Request for average setback and hardcover variance to construct a deck on lakeside of house List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G ~ Exhibit H - Application Letter of Request Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Neighborhood Survey Compilation (Average Setback) Hardcover Review & Sketch Construction Plans Pertinent Pacts - 1. Applicants propose to construct a deck that will be partially at grade level and partially about 8' above grade. 2. The deck will encroach approximately 13' past the defined average lakeshore line. 3. Hardcover on the property is as follows: 0-75* Existing 544 s.f. (5.8%) Proposed Same Allowed 75-250' 4046 s.f. (41.8%) 4179 s.f. (43.2%) 2420 s.f. (25%) Discussion The proposed deck encroachment past the average lakeshore setback line should have no significant effect on views enjoyed by neighboring property owners, since the deck is behind the lake facade line of the neighboring house to the northeast. The location of the house to the southwest suggests that no view encroachment from that side is anticipated. Zoning File #1567 July 12, 1990 Page 2 The excessive hardcover on the property is partially due to the relatively wide concrete driv-v'^v, along with a substantial concrete patio already existing .• . ’e level on the lakeside of the house. While the proposed is partially over that patio, even more of the lakeshore yard will be hard-surfaced when a deck is added. There are a few small areas of landscape rock over deteriorated plastic which have been included in the hardcover calculations. Removi'ig plastic from those areas would seem to be the least disruptive method to concurrently reduce hardcover. Removal of the 258 s.f. of plastic from all rock bed areas would v»af"o ADoroximate 1V 3921 s.f. or ^ /Oh'/ CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPMCATION Initial Application $175.0 ($50.00 per each additional^variance Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)O' PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 67 JLua J)QlC> CASC?) PT- M- ^53^/ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) (QO' l/n ^^6 3 / Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT Phone (home) -^7/' . Name _ _ _ Phone (wor)c) Address; (iP PTZip; v5~^3*^y OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Name _ _ _ _ ' c5*^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (wor.k)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Address: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ City:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Zip:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date Property Acquired _ _ _! "3!' H_ _ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) I (do) no^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT DSE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District - / CL_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Use of Property _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ('Residential _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Other (specify) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: /Xj/ C^ _ VARIANCES REQUIRED _ _ _ Lot Area _ _ _ Lot Width y( Hardcover Setbac)c Variances (_ _ _ Front _ _ _ Side _ _ _ Rear) Other —^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ IL HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strictDescribe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting : enforcement of zoning regulations; * DESCRIPTION OF DNUSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _ _ _^ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. sC 6 8. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above infomation has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete Initialed by Clerical Staff;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct^o the best of his/her knowledge. - 0,0' 9oApplicant's Signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. II ; I i I 1 ict ing • .. Robert Powell 2916 Casco Cove Wayzata, Minn. -SL ^ City of Orono; Variance Application :e. HARDSHIP: Undue hardship and practical difficulity resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations are the home was built in 1958 and we purchased it in 1973. When our home burned in 1977 it was •'uilt with plans for a deck off the dining room with a door leading out to the deck. At the time we could not fianance the deck after our loss. Now we would like to complete our plans. DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS: The unusual property conditions preventing compliance with zoning Code Requirements are that the home was built on this property in 1958 and was purchased by us 15 years later,the home cannot be moved to comply with the new Zoning requirements as there are now homes on either side of us. Part of the deck will be over an existing patio. 0 GOVT LOT 5 »-in-s5 0 GOVT LOT 5 XUOtMi lAY *0011 L/ l* 3 f7*- »0 ✓ »T r>.* • (40 ■8.45 W62) /o67 tlT.%•••.142 -(23)(22) ^127), (30 % Uf (26) <5'<r/ k (28) "J53y-N' ^ (3 “3)75S^--^-^’-^- 34) »•* C3: .18: 'iS^4*®U . • •* 61 rei‘* 6.^ (36)^, ...\^' ,r —' I (49).• vW ^94 (48)/^;,>^ I r.x.v^ /, ?? ■ (64)><x(^\^.« (61) (27y'6, ( 17), • r ^S Si^ r' C /5? I (63)^^;*'/* f. (60) ^ I *..* • 351 SUi»¥tT ll>€ / o/^,X> / ^ t^33 AX X.(C^ V x.\a> # 2 JL f /"(29)^*>t, _ .©\). (20) _«.. (0 1 V W I'’(3?) VtC occ •« 4;5i56r I .MUiei f 0 '■oOfr-—\‘ 'sm 8 ^»Vr-V * % RUN DATE 06/21/90 BATCH 006 HENNEPIN COtWTV PROPERIY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST PROP AODR 36 20-117-23 31 0028 02910 CASCO POINT RO ONNCR NAHE PHILLIP t BETTY NICCUM TAXPAYER PHILLIP J NICCUH NAHE/AODR 29X0 CASCO PT RO;y.HAYZATA HN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0031% 'PROP ADOR 02916 CASCO POINT RO ONNER KAHE 0 A H PRICE TAXPAYER DAVID H A MARY J PRICEr*NAHE/ADDR 2916 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA HN 55391 V. 30 20-117-23 31 0036 PROP ADOR 02930 CASCO POINT RD QltlER NAHE R00F«Y E KOSMATKA 69 k TAXPAYER RODNEY E KOSMATKAV,#NAME/ADOR 2930 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA FtF 55391 PROP AODR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH 006 NAHE/ADDR •% , • 0 o 58 20-117-25 31 0029 02912 CASCO POINT RO H D BARRETT A D H BARRETT MICHAEL D BARRETT 2912 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA MN 55391 58 20-117-2J 31 0032 02916 CASCO POINT RD ROBERT H POHELL JR ETAL ROBERT H POWELL JR 2916 CASCO POINT ROAD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0091 03630 CASCO AVE P GRAFFUNOER S K 6RAFFUN0ER PETER t KERRY GRAFFUNOER 3630 CASCO AV HAYZATA MN 55391 REPORT NO. PI635601 PAGE 10 38 20-117-23 31 0030 02918 CASCO POINT RD RAYMOtW J FRANKENFIELO RAYM0F40 J FRANKENFIELO 2918 CASCO POINT ROAD tUVARRE MN 55391 38 20-117-25 31 0033 02920 CASCO POINT RO JAMES H PAHL ET AL JAMES H PAHL 2920 CASCO PT RO HAYZATA FW 55391 38 20-117-21 31 0062 03600 CASCO AVE RICHARD J HAEFELE A HIFE RICHARD HAEFELE 3600 CASCO AVENUE HAYZATA FM 55391 #1 i- 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AF40 TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEFtJEPIN COUFTY 0EPARTF1ENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AF4D BELIEF. . DATE MT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, r Wayzata, Minnesota. Co C-» o V ff ?> I • ^'(ii *«v*4 . \ u: PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVCVORS ANO LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS (612) 421-9126 13621 VINE WOOD LANE DAYTON, MNMUr DESCRIPTION: Lot L, Registered Land Survey No. A61, City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. o Denotes Iron Monument SCALE: 1" = 20' NOTE: The locution of the proposed deck is per sketch plan by Sears Decks, based on tree location. -To. f''”*' All hard surface areas are as shown. I * AS ! oa I v«p- ^**^1 \A vu> v» ./ c*' * \ o**” i I hereby certify that this survey \»as prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 18th day of June, 1990. Minnesota License 12267 A 7 \ A 7: / / /t, «•» < 4-I 0 // A 1 A/,t: '^hl( ' ^ y ■ • ^ ^ * • *A* •» •-- • 4 *•'•.#* C^nUl«'9l«p*« ••»% • ' ^4T «***4bw ••%<•- *•*•■ - •*., •• •• •■'• ♦•*•. «". •»♦•••* • • •*# V «**.••*•• •-**."•%. •• ^ ,i#** *«, ,y # *■•. i - .*.. .■ - .- -^ • •• •• . -•••-• •..#•• «^. «# • ..................•••••% ^•\. •• «••'.»•%;'-• #’.^.-•^•••■ •. • ♦ * 0 ^ • »* • ../vyv A.r-?»..»v. •. ^ ;*•••,•. m/mt •-..-i »,*...•.•# ;.•.•.•• w^.*..4i-....,:r-**-» «*w>*.’.*^ I •*• * •* •**»4>.-*,; ./*• • ^.#. »•/’i" :'i^; >'t.....• i?\r*. •-.^/ ‘,..r . • . • •• . •. .. . ..^...:f.-i,- .. .-• r •.x.-... ./..••• x*. ....*.• ^.v • .:• ::v>.:-t:. •••^•* ' >k* ♦•'•-• v**;*-» - - w,* >-*' • •• . .r- •.. « * * ’ . - *.• y . # ■ • . ^ • - -• . ., . • •.; ••'•'‘.•.•.••^.'••.,- 9 // CT^ r J J0C6 )o 0 , £*iiting 't>weHinq r-vo ’£>ecic i_£onfo Shoreline 9% per R L S Wo. 4Ci Eievshon of Like Ice • 926 tO, December 22, 19S^ •** f . !r:__- JCAsc^ ^oiAiT; _______ ^ot”../4<^^a 2-^.SiO^ y't?^ P -s*:^,. -2.ST^ \ Ma^COI/^T^. ?_______ ____ - 7VS.A 2,7. 2- >” ?S //* 7<s>V ^ . ________ II 2.;, <✓ >'2.£-./* 5‘17 C II / ;»' '^g.r ; Y,b ’FiLa/^s y'Bh V - /(57 r M = Sli,A » 1 g.s >r n - 3^ • •3. r 5^'- n H ^O, 1 y/S -- 342-£ % 1 fi-• V2. t%Z\ y '•/, ^/^^- ^n (<L d^MC., fATiO / V X P /4 ft Bo X/E/'2_- 1^^ tf S X ^ o /^= 2SO aJ n 3S >-2-1/2 - 31^^o ____ P:>c^fiusTrc i v k 37:^0 Pf2oPo5 eT^ ^ 2.V - ^ C» Lir^S fo(i-r\Of^ <pvtp^ f^ATlo - :jOT^ A^su iT(o t^Aru p^Poz tT^ .». /3 £ irC „ Aftf 1---------qfcgp '~^3; 2 /•-------- 0-~7S’: Ac A-* ?y^CO »j'.t ■^cA^Jof'i ^/tP«y«5V'/ijf. »5Tg %. (^/oo crttMa^^ote^.iS* outtve,i tuK: nr. nrs Robert Powell 2916 Casco Point Road Wayzata, I'lnnesota. J(yxo & <=/hu>elaU% DESCRIPTIONS Lot L, Registered Land Survey No. 461, City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. o Denotes Iron Monument SCALE; 1" = 20' NOTE: The location of the proposed deck is per sketch plan by Sears Decks, based on tree location. All hard surface areas are as shown. I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 18th day of June, 1990. Minni 12267 To: From: Date: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator July 11, 1990 Subject: #1568 James & Judith Pierpont, 1801 West Farm Road Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing Zoning Distruct: LR-IA Pertinent Ordinance- Section 10.28, Subdivision 3 (A) - Conditional Use Permit required for proposed conversion of stable into independent guest house structure. All regular lot requirements shall be met by guest house area. A. Required = 4 acres (2 acres for each residential unit) Proposed = 5+ acreas B. C. Required separation per LR-IA zone = 60' Existing = 58' Structure in its present location will apparently never be a prinicipal structure if property is to be subdivided. If Lot 14 is to be divided from existing homestead (Lot 15 + 1/3 of Lot 16) structure would have to be reconverted to an approved accessory structure without a dwelling unit or removed. Review of existing side setbacks (north lot line). Refer to Exhibit G. Required = 30' Barn =5' 4" Garage =1' 6" Street Setback Required Stable = 49' = 50' Note new connecting addition will be 11+' from north lot line. Side setback variance required for total structure » 28' 6" or 95.3% Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (B) - Detached garages and other accessory structures may be located within street yards as property is considered a lakeshore lot (with the acquisition of 1/3 of Lot 16 as a result of a recent lot line rearrangement. The lot would be technically defined as a lakeshore lot.) Zoning File #1568 July 11» 1990 Page 2 Section 10.22^ Subdivision 2 - Hardcover Regulation As property would be allowed some 43/560++ square feet of hardcover Hardcover facts have not been required. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D“1 Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit L Application Property Owners List Plat Map and D-2 - Bracken Letter (Owner of Property to Immediate North, Part of Lots 16 and 17) and Survey of Property Septic Map On-Site Inspection Report 7/7/87 & 4/24/90 Survey 3/17/78 Confirming Setbacks of Accessory Structures from North Side Lot Line Building Section Floor Plans Elevations Site Plan Lots 14, 15 and Part of 16 Survey 2/20/90 Lots 15 and Parts of Lot 16 Review of Current Application - Applicants propose conversion of an existing stable into a guest house unit. Full conversion consists of a silo like addition to connect the adjacent garage as one structure. The new addition is placed approximately 11' from the north lot line and will be approximately 6' 5" x 13' 6". The addition will consist of a first floor utility room and staircase to an open second floor level. The first floor of the existing barn will be converted into a living room, bath and kitchen area. The loft area of the barn will be converted into a bedroom. The applicant advises that his architect confirms the existing foundations are in good condition. The barn floor will be paved with cement and covered with a layer of brick flooring. The conversion of structure into a residential unit will require that the structure meet all pertinent standards of the building and fire codes. All improvements of the north side of the existing garage and guest house must meet the standards of the state fire code requiring special fire wall construction. The proposed silo addition will not exceed the height of the existing barn. The neighbor receiving the most impact from the proposed improvement has sent a letter confirming his approval of tht project. Review Exhibits D-1 and D-2. Note neighbor's house has been placed 150'+ to the east on Lot 17 and receives no visual impact from the improved structure. J Zoning File #1568 July 11, 1990 Page 3 The applicants have recently acquired Lot 14. To staff's knowledge, we are not aware if the applicant has applied for the legal combination. If the City is to approve a conditional use permit for the guest house unit, the applicant must apply for the legal combination prior to the issuance of the building permit for the conversion in order to meet the area requirements for an independent guest house unit. As alreat’v ^oted above, if Lot 14 was to be divided at some future from the homestead property, the guest house unit would to be converted to an approved accessory structure that shoul*.. ^*ot contain a dwelling unit. This would also be a condition of the approval of a conditional use permit. Please review Exhibits E and F. The City has no knowledge of the capacity of the exisitng septic system that serves the current residence. Please note the tanks have not been pumped since 1980. In April of this year the owner was advised once again of the need to pump the system. If a second residential unit is to be approved for this property, the owner has the option to either use the present system to serve the proposed guest house and to install a new conforming system to serve the existing residence or to have a contractor confirm by uncovering existing system for staff's visual inspection. Staff may then determine if existing system is capable of serving both existing house and guest house unit and what other improvements may be necessary to serve both units. Options of Action Denial - If denied, please refer to Section 10.09, Subdivision 6 for the necessary findings for denial of conditional use permit and to Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A) for the necessary findings for denial of the variances. Approval - To approve a conditional use permit for a guest house unit and existing setback variances as follows: A. A variance to the required separation setback from one principal structure to another approving a 58' setback instead of the required 60' separation. B. An existing 1' 6" setback from the north side lot line (garage portion of structure) instead of the required 30' setback. C. An existing street setback of 49' 1“ instead of the required 50' (setback from stable/barn structure) D. Proposed side setback variance A side setback for the proposed addition located 11+' instead of the required 30'. Zoning File #1568 July 11, 1990 Page 4 This approval is based on one or more of the following findings or hardships; 1. Property consists of 5+ acres. 2. The property owner to the immediate north that receives the most visual impact from the structure has submitted written approval of the project. Property owner's house is located 150+' further east of the subject structure. 3. Existing structures and foundations are in good condition and will be able to sustain the proposed renovations and improvements for residential habitation. 4. There is adequate and suitable area for on-site septic development to support the second residential unit with one bedroom. Approval shall be subject to the following conditions; 1. Applicant to submit an additional $50.00 payment for the variance portion of the land use application. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for conversion of the stable into a guest house, applicant must provide proof of the legal combination of parcel 14 with the homestead parcel. 3. Prior to the issuance of the building permit, applicant shall advise the Orono staff as to their plan for serving the existing guest house with a sewage treatment system. Options available: a. Contractor to uncover existing system for City's evaluation . b. Connection of guest house to existing system and installation of new system for existing residence. 4. Applicant is placed on notice that at some future date if Lot 14 is to be divided from the homestead parcel, guest house structure must be converted to an approved accessory structure that does not contain an independent dwelling unit. 5. All portions of improved structure located less than 5' from north side lot line shall meet all fire code standards. Isv CITY OP CRONO - G PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 1901 mmomu n5020000ii T 01 L.rucrv Ti01 150.00 0e^r Pfinm 'Rdn d i4 rrjL 06/22V90 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) dojoj /':) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name ^2foo/r/^ pfeP,PA/^i— Address /Sci LU^'^r pjpo Phone (home) • 9if3 _ _ _ _Phone (work) 3'T-l • City ichte^inid^ Zip r.r=?.r/. OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Naune Phone Address City Zip Date Property Acquired^^<-<L.w I (do) (do not) also own theP adjacent parcels of land. (month/year) PEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use T $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration * t Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore ! PRD/PID - see fee schedule R APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Appeals Other *■ see fee schedule PRBSBNT USB OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) .1^ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: .■» ,J. yi ,‘jJ- J 0 9 t- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map. 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff tim-j* not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant'i, signature 7 Date 2.2 / OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature -/■nt^t Date C 22 / Applicant must have all submittals into^the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building s Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. RUN DATE 06/22/90 BATCH 017 PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR Olt4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERFY ONNERS LIST 38 27-116-23 ^3 0016 018<I9 NEST FARM RD THE FARM AT LONG LAKE THE FARM AT LONG LAKE C/O TIMOTHY ADAMS 1810 NEST FARM ROAD LOG LAKE MN 55356 38 27-118-23 0005 01719 NORTH FARM RD DIR FIELD BENJAMIN R I REBECCA S FIELD 1729 NORTH FARM RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 27-118-23 ^ 0008 01669 NORTH FARM RD JOSEPH H OFFERMAN JOSEPH H OFFERMAN 1669 N FARM RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 34-118-23 11 0001 00776 BRONN RD N J MYERS I J TEUNISSEN-MYERS J MYERS I J TEUNISSEN-MYERS 776 BRONN RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 0007 N 38 34-118-23 11 00800 BRONN RD V I D STEIN VICTOR N STEIN 800 BRONN RD N LONG LAKE MT4 55356 38 34-118-23 12 0006 00770 BRONN RD N H I 1 MUTTER HEir42 F MUTTER 770 NORTH BRONN ROAD LONG LAKE MT4 55356 38 27-118-23 43 0017 01810 NEST FARM RD TIMOTHY ADAMS TIMOTHY ADAMS 1610 NEST FARM ROAD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 27-118-23 44 0006 01709 NORTH FARM RD L I R ROSENGREN RANDY V ROSENGREN 1709 NORTH FARM RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 36 27-118-23 44 0016 01801 NEST FARM RD J N I J A PIERPONT JAMES H I JUDITH A PIERPONT 1801 NEST FARM RD LOtJG LAKE MN 55356 38 54-118-23 11 0002 00780 BROI'>^* RD N DALE E LlNOC^o ^T I NIFE DALE E LINDQUIST 780 BROItl ROAD LONG LAKE MT4 55356 38 34-118-23 12 0003 00690 DROHI4 RD N KATHRYN DUNCANSON K I A C DUNCANSON 690 BRONT4 RD N LOf4G LAKE W 55556 TOTAL BATCH 017 00016 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 50 38 27-118-23 43 0018 01860 NEST FARM RD THE FARM AT LONG LAKE , THE FARM AT LONG LAKEIH C/O TIMOTHY ADAMS 1810 NEST FARM ROAD LONG LAKE MN 55369 38 27-118-23 49/06b7 01699 NORTH FA«M RD M E I H E seibol'd : ! MARVIN I HELEN SEIB6lD. 1699 NORTH FARM RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 27-118-23 44 0017 01770 NEST FARM RD Ttl I M BRACKEN NILLIAM M I MARGARET BRACKEN 1770 N FARM RD LOT4G LAKE »t4 55356 38 34-118-23 11 0003 00036 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED DALE E LINDQUIST I NIFE DALE E LINDQUIST 780 BRONN ROAD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 34-118-23 12 0005 00744 BROm RD N R I R FOROYCE RICHARD E FORDYCE 326 MATTISON OR CONCORD MA 01742 ^5 •2 .‘V RUN DATE 06/22/90 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OW4ERS LIST REPORT NO. PI43540I PAGE 5X BATCH 017 m I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPMESEriTATlON OF INFORMATIOM AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE IIErt4EPIN COUIfTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHUOGE AND BELIEF.<7 DATE A. C €■VL, I 5: If t I P V ■V. € i (9) ' (20) (15) A i 06) (16) (24) 51. »i| )WN RO N...im C4sr ^ #«5 ^ * • • • # • *•>. oO (5)^ • X • M • X ♦i • 8 nr-N iHjJf (17) •*. o A) 5J /•>it iV •; •,>• : .f» S I 1. i )• • 38r V ' •'(( L0X9 LAKE '% W- .* «« ■.4 ! 1 y. ••• . «5i> t V .T, f»St t: (I) 3i) ‘i.-’ u-.*' - t. r I - - , • 4 *.-4 -*’ *U f f*# \ - -. . * 4 4 t -• ’ Lvt ;v -\- iD-/ - -• ,•■ |» - A ' ' . ■> • * ' » - • .* ./*' . ; ' V- * .*. '• ■ ' " I*#* m i*- *; %* ' ■ ^ ♦ Ik*... * *•. ^ 'A J , I t f ^ ^ k • • V r > ^' • ::.■=■■; .1 ' ■ i*. ^ ■,*»..* .' ■*. . .. i • i ■■i‘ • ^/' ■'•> *.<» '*•• * :V '.*' ‘f • .. I ■", v<'. •.r/' , . -V'hv. V' >-.'A v'.,* '*' ' ■ V * ♦» *. « ’• ' T ' ■ .' ' • ■ ' • ‘ “ r\•> Iw-" ■' • *.♦. r *- yl* '■•■ • •- V**.‘*’* - •**•'* »•* -i r» ‘ <»*••• V ,k' • - ‘4.‘- . ■ir=‘^.* * * , • -A •. ^ •. ^ • (■\ ’,** . ■ . r: •;*- .■• ■ 't. ■*, ■'l'■ - ■ 1^*.. »**• , '' • ' • i ___ ^ ’’j .•^/•*.*>**V* '-•1 *f •-'A* /, ^ I y* ^ ■ • A'■■•'- *’ '• .’ ■ * >,•**• : rr -•' , ■ V* * •" '■ ■ * ■ * '■ '• ' • ■ r •, ■ ’ ' “'• •*■'*’• « ‘—r , " f. •»' * • ‘ •■' •; L. lik-****. \1 • * - !»• • ♦ v**.‘ • '* V , •V*- '' A.' ■■ \ *■ Ij',' a- « ♦'v-■ « [• * -■ ' k*A ♦* '[ > ^ \. *> ♦ A’* . ' ^ ■ *.y ■J t J / A .‘4 i*. . ^ ’1-- \ * , ’•**'. i V ^ -■# *...■■,44 \*.4' ' - .•1 • * « I ■* '; ' ‘ • *<A * 4 1 ^ * i ** ♦ / "k*.■* • 1 1 > ' «» 4 * «:A > - „■ t. . M' % . 4 . A i =*, '*•/.«♦ . *1*^. \ :\ 'JOL i ® 18S0 *7 ,*^ -. • - «*i t * ^« * « •Jr r.nnr a-. . ■■'s.-u-; t.*i Su i ) .1 j '• ■% ;. - .* I '• Z — •.* ..I ; J r.;T.r S J J Z ! : ' - r ' : : z z^i Z I z 4 I* r. i ^ -s : r" *- .t - • Z.'• •• * •* 1 ~ • •• *- * i r ! ,‘jr- : : rr - ■ . . u- r t;in :.;' V n Z^yZ -h r.‘ ^ r rC:ir. “ r -r r —• I : n * mA « . * r. ♦. I r r : **'t ‘ r r - -4 t « >., * ,v c r*r r. s 1 -7 r CVr • -r.i I *—■:# '• '4 .•i » i ,.-r :r..r i t ». 1 i *. -5 » ** 4 -W A f . - . ^.r ; \r.m ■ ^ ♦ “ i • “ . * - *1, . ♦ 4 . „ - I «• **" «• 2^' Ui : ! rr:-c .''.-n lii v^-* ? • .. ^ ■ ... . - M A . 'a-, ry>-^'izvr'' -'Z'vyA •* i - ;.■ t.\.*4 ■ -* • » -f *••• /•'♦••«.%• ■ - A - ^ «i . V -f»AA , '? V »■'■ *, 't ‘ A ■>- ■,•.• •‘»V* *• - INNOVATIVE MICROGRAPHICS DUE TO THE POOR CONDITION OF THE PRECEEDING DOCUMENT WE CANNOT PRODUCE AN ACCEPTABLE MICROFILM IMAGE. 4 i OitOSi] SJjpy c\OF ORQN,? B u IL D t N review/ *7^ ’ ^ r r •*\‘^ • - " * ^ vj “ ^ N ^ '-• - • •Mr > D t / ^ A - **,..<• «^ \ I r **. 1 iN^ ^ M- r • v-' • -'<=> -5p - »—.3 In •.;. :" ^ . -- X, ^ re .-.^ •'*(.• * •• . ^ - ^*r 44! / 4 iw» w-Q%A-rJ:-; ssr ^‘“-X TK££P. ThiJ I —V / /■'' ^ ttOOS£ •?oi *C *5^ ’' 0 227. £><? fr*^’ ^ V >6Z3.06 £a^i • \ • • • 0 o Denotes Iron Monument XOOO.O Denotes Existing Elevation 1000.01 Denotes Proposed Elevation ------Denotes Direction of Surface Drainage « • Proposed Top of Foundation Elevation = f/.o Proposed Garage Floor Elevation = Jo.£ Proposed Lowest Floor Elevation = 8^-^ I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of: Lot 17 and the north 10^.72 feet of Lot 16, Block 1, THE FARM AT LONG LAKE, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles. And of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and oil visible encroachments. If any, from or on said land. As surveyed by me this day of June |9 ____. . 1 ':P A ■ A, I a7 / / / Thomas S. Bergquist Registered Land Surveyor, Minn. Lie. No,7725 -V S ATHRE-BERGQUIST. INC. 1 AJ iSi lAtr \naviata tivo • mtatiata. mii ititi CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY for BRUCE BREN HOMES V. J • .* INSPECTION RECOMD PUMPOUT RECOnu DATE COMPLIANCE DATE gallons (f'11'8^ Ato .Sc’gp<\c/Ai(:> ,\j(irTF7>_ 'TJLL l UL. ri~> <1^ r\. .2.bfi-QO /S'OO C-- COfJronWlNG $ SUUSIArJDAUD N MONCONrOHMING •i \ V ^ A • K ..V . , i * *? . I vi • t #. 4 # ; • r >• • ’ •f ,•, i* . LOCATION SKETCH ;/ ' / Ir/clycJe: 1) Well location 2) Distance from house to septic tanks, dist. box, and drainfield 3) North arrow and road /V • -r • i , ;?/«: '• \v \i $ * , / * '■iM f 4 4 •U ‘•r. • ’ xi... I'. •* • r I • *• • •• *• • i i . • *. i » • ■| .* • I • •* •» . •. . i . ,1-\ . ; M.;. • • *V • \ • * j • i r' ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT INSPECTION REPORT CITY Ii 1I ORONCj On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka POST OFFICE BOX 66 1335 S. Brown Rd. Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 OWNER n \)\C M.ar4-i/iig>!ADDRESS 1*^0 { (a1 j _5T fhcrn— PERMIT NO ;S. dates ----^ ~ 11 CONTRACTORS 5ST50TV iC^ city Ordinance No. 210 requirei that each onsite sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is fS. an existing system □ new construction) Meets or exceeds current City standards in 'll respects relating to design, construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly. Does not meet all current City standards for new construction (1978 Codel but in most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed generally m accordance with previous codes. System appears to be functioning properly; no maior upgrading of the system is required at this time. Does not meet current City standards m m.iny respects relating to design, construction, or location. Appears to be operating adeauately at this time, but has a relatively hign potential for future problems. No major upgrading of system is required at this time. System may or may not meet current City standards for design, construction or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current input, and is endangering a water sudpIv. or is a source of pollution to surface or groundwaters, or is creating a safety haaard. or is otherwise creating a public nuisance. Please contact the C.ty Inspector to discuss system repair/ replacement procedures. If dramfield replacement is necessary, soil testing will usually be required, and a design and site plan must be submitted for review. Your contractor must obtain a permit before work is started. □ 1 3 2 □ 3 □ 4 SYSTEM CONDITION ( O Checked itemi may require your action) Tank inspection indicates: D Pumpout not needed at this time. n Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pump ed out this year to help prevent future problems. □ Solids accumulation in tanks is at a ciiticul tevel. Tanks should be pumped out as soon as possible, n System is discharging to surface. Tanks must be pumped within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge, B Inspection risers missing—tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers (4‘* dia. pipe) must be installed in each tank at ne*t pumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. Q Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle. (Does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation.) If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. Dramfield inspection indicates: / H Dramfield is dry. no surfacing evident, (j O D Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. □ Dramfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. This condition may require replace ment Of additions to dramfield. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repairs must be completed wiihm 90 days. □ Dramfield extent and condition unknown. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Limiting Site Factors □ Slope Q Soil □ High water table □ Lot sue □ Lake, wetland, or stream n Drainage COMMENTS: Pot.i*. I for System Failure Idepem*. on soil types, water table, and system condition) □ Low H Medium Q High D System is causing visible surface discharge. Site Capabilities for Future Expansion S3 Adequate □ Fair □ Poor □ Inadequate n I )o •VVicp- '■/-/ >drQ\rN-Pg.lr) 4c... ju C —Pts y "kb V- 7- Date of Inspection '(ffSeptic Syj Q, hSpec tor Not#; In the event that th.i in.oect.oo report it uteJ to wtiify the requ.rerrenti (or e mo.tgege or other tran.fer of property, ^ atJvitetJ thet this report doe« not guarentee or certify that an emitting tyttem w.M continue to function properly, but it merely an opinion of the eOeouaev of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be ' i the premises with jvstem location and pumping records. WHITE COPY / InspecfOr't GOLD COPY / Hrmeowntr h-. ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT INSPECTION REPORT h CITY 1 OF I ORONO OWNER U\i\Cr address On the tS'orth Shore of Lake Minnetonka POST OFFICE BOX 66 1335 S. Brown Rd. Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 PERMIT NO.'S. DATES CONTRACTORS rf f w « V m Citv Ordinance No. 210 require* that each onsite sewage treatment system in Orono be inscected on a regular basis. The on-s.te sewage treatment system at the above address has been insp.-cted and appears to fall into the category checKed below. (This is □ an existing system □ new construction) 0^2 Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design, construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly. upgrading of the system is required at this time. Does not meet current C.ty standards m many respects relating to design, construction, or location. Appears to be operating adwuatcly at this time, but has a relatively h.gn potential for future problems. No ma,or upgrading of system .s required at this time. System may or may not meet current City standards for design, construction or location, but ,s failing to properly treat and dispose of the current input, and .s endangering a water suoplv. or ,s a source of pollution to surface or groundwai.rs. or is creating a safety hazard, or -s otherwise creating a public nuisance. P'ease contact the C-ty Inspector replacement procedures. If drainlield replacement is necessary, soil testing will usually be required, and a design and Site plan must be submitted for review. Your contractor must obtain a permit before work is started. SYSTEM CONDITION ( G3 Checked items may require your action) Tank inspection indicates: n Pumpout not needed at this lime. □ Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pump ed out this year to help prevent future problems. D Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical levci. Tanks should be pumped out as soon as possible. O System is discharging to surface. Tanks must be pumped jwithin 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. ^^Inspection risers missing—tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe) must be installed in each tank at next oumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. D InsD'-'ciion pipe is located directly over tank baffle. (Does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation.) If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now Drainf^d inspection indicates; ^3I^»’ainfield is dry. no surfacing eviaent. Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. □ Drainf.eld is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. This condition may require replace* rt'eni or additions to drainfield. Contact the City Inspector immecliatciv. must be compicted wilhm 90 days. □ Drainfield extent and condition unknown. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Limiting Site Factors jb Slope □ Soil □ High water table C Lot si/t □ Lake, wetland, or stream □ Drainage Potential for System Failure (depends on soil types, water table, and sy:tem condition) □^ow l^Medium □ High G System is causing visible surface discharge. Site Capabilities for Futures xpannon iSAdequdte □ Fair D Poor O Inadequate COMMENTS: alodai' surface oiscnar^c. ^ nacL i/e/i b If I Date of Inspection Septic System Inipector Note- In the event that th.s inspection report is used to satisfy the requ.tements for • mortgege or other transfer of property. ^ J^r/ei^rt ^not guarentee or certify th.t an existing system w.il continue to function properly, but i. nter.ly an opm.on of th. .dequaev of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This rtport must be kept on the premises with system location and pumping records. WHITE COPY / Inspector s File GOLD COPY / Homeowner cr - CLARK ENGINEERING COMPANY □ 2815 WAYZATA BOULEVARD Q MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55405 Q 1612) 374 4740 • • I • • ' •4 • f 9 * £xHi0/r~g& i.isr.oi. cor.05 . , CB>N54*S0 19 • 1 - - - •|.6’ 22*24.0 — 7.a'/' 0 M52*00*0C"W 62.80 ,-s»9.6' see Nore i 9' see NOTE 2 * » // -----rAST 227 • ••• • •••#317 CAST 227 00 house LOT 15 BLOCK I t0*0r9'inag§ BUfittty £o99mtnf^ _____________________I __I flLt: - /go/ V: -•-WeST 3 2 8 50 NOTE 1. 2. Barn - 1 foot roof overhancj, also a hayloft overhang, 1.2* within North line of Lot 15. Garage - 1 foot roof overhang, 0.6' within North line of Lot 15. Scale 1" « 100* o Denotes Iron Monument « PROPOSED DESCRIPTION Ci>'- - Lot 15, Block 1, The Farm at Long Lake CERTIFICATION L 4*' 'O I hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Land Surveyor under the laws of-^he State,,o^l|linne>ot^ BY: i ________DATE:7-//- 7^ MN REG. NO. 5713 li^e ft! Ke 11 ey , P.E. 4 L-5/ OATC . 3-17-78 OflAWN JRS COMM. NO. 7839 - %:- -p- -• f f PROPOSED LOT 15,BLOCK I THE FARM AT LONG LAKE FOR TIM ADAMS . 8H8ET NUMBE R OF 2 SHTS.0^ \ -; n •t; ■( ^pT.hl, p»gvi^eo Nf2-^r fuoo% Pi^A^Ki I’-o-■^5.Al<r-ntJi£» J5-OT AC»plf|OM Mo ^Xc.^ ^.F. t-<lfr^'f"‘'<<>'- j 3-U ?;itl<J'Tl^4t* y-'-rs 0 « • ■7^' %• • ! —^» .. ................... 1 ' •"*■............................• • f 4« j -------L >=--—P-— Zjz Ii • •• • - •, Pl^AU *• • ^ •». •mM-* J /i** •• • • i f" 'ui’U'TH iJ,WAri«M '/»'■ «■ r-o*•/.» > f'-0» t r?- . - . m% Jfc.'U ; . .**'. Z »•- w I «• ^ srnmm ^ M >^V i , m I m *-•-* -•,• • -i* *•#* - ^ <»., . ,• -.‘...* .f *•-• ..«i • -' • • *i^----- •'. .«'ijir^'»*rr'.*% .<n ..•• ..urti^V•’-;*>t »• ka« «^Ww ^t*.>.-£*vi*’.:; '1. ^ •? ' .». *.•' V*. ••». »• • • J-'. V,^ --■ t - • * .;v ..-i . ****’^>* ^ V»-Va^COSi^:a>*’ * "\W 1 ( \ x' \ •• }t^ t**<*~.* M-<«c».i^ - •••U f -» :i« 4« ■V. « •• %»#•«#> •• ••• »••« • ««••* V \ ' \ \ \ . *«» IX ^ . •i«* ADDITION 4 REMODE lNG FOR: I. A MRS. JAMES W. PIERPONT U% St HILLCRLST cottage 'W. Firm Rotd Long talc Minnrmta 5S)5d ‘ 0 ;-i © w *.**• • •** • a -.4 - •• i-'.,'/#♦ ••«• • • •••• m-. “■ • •• •-^ »••/••.*<.*•.• *,/•• •»•»■•■ . • .>4«» %» •. ••• ••.*••••*.» t' ■ N< « ••■*. V vk JC V\*^«i-* w‘‘L **^ * . , •‘-p*-'-.-t» « •. ,*. ^^ •. • .*i.-',w r- -.« * . . ■ ♦■ .««..' .■;--i*. «.■•,• « . *.*; «*T-.vxw :^ ■ *«^ *.- -.5,^*xT. .* « >.a ..-.• v.^-.^1. - y _-y^ ■• v«v, N-*-.- • a.* ... *............... . .. . •,.«*. ^ .• *V • •• . .,tp 4^ *'*'■•''•_* • .... , ... . . .,..., ••■ • wr. '.>» • •••• •* * *, .-• •'■* fA-* •*!••• « aM\»*»V»5«akr.=w»W .. .- a *-..* . . .a...*.* .* •-i.?..\.. . .,%•• -. •. »•;? !>»♦ Mlr^ ' ij*.- «»<.»« i r “^VNr*vrV/'r-'-.r.*»'•'•I *.•# ••'• -•••.•• . . -. . ,. ., ^ .. ^ . /;.. r.ortfM|CA«c^d7^7^r-i«a ’’ ft%:5)rtnr ■ .......... ■ - - - - ‘.A-., F.-Tx:-;• i.'V .•» - .» . r * — mm' .'”«^'i;:.:,'::^‘:J^'‘;:.,•^.^' 'r';" •» -• •»•■• •* c^.. m .X .,... r.j,.,.-, •' "• '">• *“• ’» "•>• w... 1.-. ""jo? ?;* .."rr:;.***'--* —*•> s> ..................... (I*...!»; * #• ♦ • mm % « jiy 1^! w>g>i!>v»3pii»gy<sw^ V.• %, mi. .4 •,. . ..- '' »rr*— V7| if r ,T.,y : - 1 -.•- . .^ * .A.-. . ,4 . ». . - • „.• ;.. v*,. ..; . , - .. H.v.:-;.-X*..: •. v:.' V V;1 v ./ .'•^j*-*.-.*--*^*** 4i-f , •;;» .•» «\ . •.».««..% % • .r: ' .t- /» • • j : *, _ __T _ ------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------... . . . -. , . ^ . . , . • r—r. .V . * T* J.T- ''j*-7Lr ’* ZT.*.-,. . •. • *.rr.r ^ vr. i *. r^5 -^-ri *?v-f jr»-fr^r-tr.‘^fX*rn-:cr:-/^ *. o ».• •%%.-*• t« • I - I f 0-n-??9??55S5.v.v..CT aa.if;-»jBr««t.-4isr^r:J. -■ -• • . ••. t. ,, ^-. . *>• * fos From: Date Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator July 13, 1990 Subject: #1569 Sam McCloud, 4280 Bayside Road Variance Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-IA ! Pertinent Ordinances & Special Issues to be Addressed for this Review - 1. Section 10.27, Subdivision 5 (A) a) Area: Required Existing 5 acres 6.5 acres (contiguous dry land above 935 elevation) 2. 3. 4. b) Front/Street Setback; Required = 100' Proposed = 68' Variance =32' or 32% c) Height of structure to be confirmed at your meeting. Applicant has not included elevations of structure. Staff does not foresee a problem as this > a one story walk-out structure. Section 10.27, Subdivision 4 (A) - Section 10.02, Definition - Animal unit and Section 10.27, Subdivsiion 4 (A). In addition to all accessory structure ordinances. a) Current location of barn as shown on your plans is not final as the proposed septic sites will be located in that same location. The barn must be placed on the property to meet the following setbacks: 100' from front street yard 26' from wetlands 935' elevation 75' from all other property lines 4 b) Based on the 6.5 acres of area, a total number of 4 horses may be maintained on the site. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C) - Allowed area for accessory structure = 3,000 s.f. Proposed * 2,280 s.f. (5?'x40‘) Zoning File #1569 July 13, 1990 Page 2 of 4 5.Septic code requirement. As of this writing, the City is not in receipt of the final perc and boring tests performed on July 12, 1990. We are assured by the on-site septic evaluator that he will have the information into staff by late Friday or early Monday so that staff can confirm suitable area for on-site sewage/disposal systems for the proposed 10 bedroom home. The evaluator has found suitable area based on slope conditions and 75' set back from the wetlands (review Exhibit E). Section 10.03, Subdivision 21 - Exception. A determination as to whether the proposed land alterations fall under this section or require separate conditional use permit review. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit Bl-2 - Applicant's Addendum Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Plat Map Exhibit E - Conceptual Septic Mapping Exhibit FI- Topographic Survey 1=100' approximation Exhibit G - Site Plan Exhibit H - First Floor Plan Exhibit I - Lower Floor Plan Review of Application - The applicant proposes the residential development of the 20+ acre site to the immediate east of the Parten property. If members remember, this is the property that is served by the 60' wide easement through the Parten property. Staff has never received a copy of the easement document. Technically the property appears landlocked. Prior to scheduling the application before the Council, the City must be in receipt of a copy of the easement document. Applicant will be responsible for extending the existing private drive to the west boundaries of the property. Based on all previous reports, the current easement will allow a driveway within the 60* right-of-way as shown. Review Exnibit E, the site plan that locates septic systems to serve the proposed residence, the proposed barn at 57'x40' must be relocated on the site to meet the setbacks defined above. The property with total acreage at 20+ acres would permit a 3,000 s.f. oversized accessory structure. The proposed structure is 2,280 s.f. Zoning File #1569 July 13, 1990 Page 3 of 4 It is net customary for the City to ask for septic testing when dealing with a 6>s acre dry contiguous site. Many portions of this site are restricted for septic use with severe slopes and by the required setback of 75' from the wetland. In addition, please review the floor plans of the proposed structure. There is a total of 10 bedrooms proposed for this residence. Two of those bedrooms are proposed for guest or domestic staff use. The two sleeping rooms are located on the first floor. Note that there are no kitchen areas proposed. Applicant is advised that if kitchen areas are ever installed to serve this section, a separate conditional use permit will be required for a guest house/non-rental apartment. The crucial issue for this review will be if applicant's consultant can provide test results that confirm the site can maintain a 10 bedroom home. Once again, staff will confirm the capabilities of the site at your meeting. In reviewing the site plan (Exhibit F), note the grading proposed as a result of the major cutting and filling to be done on the site. The applicant will be expected to file detailed grading and drainage plans with the building permit application, providing detail on all retaining walls on the site. Note the retaining walls proposed are located well within the required setback for accessory structure. Applicant's representative should provide information as to the maximum height of the walls proposed . It is difficult for staff to determine whether a separate conditional use permit review would be required lacking detailed plans. As one may argue that because of the topography the necessary land alterations and retaining walls are required to protect the foundation of this oversized principal structure. The building and zoning code would allow such land alterations under a building permit. Planning Commission may \.ish to ask further questions of the applicant and to provide direction to the staff. Please review Exhibit Bl-2, Mr. Webber has provided a listing of the hardships and unique findings for this property in seeking a front/street setback at 68' where the 100' setback is required. They are reviewed as follows: 1. The majority of the home meets the 100' setback. The setback variance is sought for only a garage and entry addition to the residence. 2. The house has been placed at the edge of the ridge in order to minimize erosion and the major cutting into the more steeper elevations. Zoning File #1569 July 13, 1990 Page 4 of 4 3. The severe slopes to the east and north required placement at the top of the ridge in order to minimize impact on extreme dense vegetation. This will minimize the removal of trees in the steeper elevations decreasing potential for erosion problems. The total finished area of the house is approximately 11,594 s.f. (7,402 1st floor, 4,192 s.f. finished area lower level). Applicant should be advised that any future development of the lower level involving higher water usage may be very difficult based on the limited area of dry lands at 6% or less. Options of Action - Denial. If denied, please refer to the necessary findings in Section 10.08; or Approval, pending confirmation that there is adequate area for on-site sewage treatment facilities to serve a 10 bedroom home approving a front street setback variance of 32' or 32% for Sam McCloud for the property located at 4280 Bayside Road, based on the findings set forth by applicant's architect noted above, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant to provide detailed grading/drainage plans with detail on retaining wall upon application for a building permit. 2. Applicant/owner is placed on notice that additional improvements to this structure involving increase in water usage may be prohibited based on limitations of available dry lands at less than 6% slope. Pending final determination for need for separate conditional use permit review, applicant may be allowed to proceed with setback variance application and file a separate conditional use permit for August meeting if grading is found to exceed the allowed amount associated with a building permit; or Table subject to applicant filing a conditional use permit application. L,. CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional varia Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original applicati After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) 1569 PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Met Li rr*»v nr nr.'i'nn will Ul WIMJlUJ l«»t»-44»eeo ft rirrv ’fV’ I. f I i.± I vv uCtTrtjT^ruytiK' vnii ni / I On(/<?/ •!■:./ IV Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Phone (home) Phone (work) APPLICANT Name Address * OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name ^ MtCleoo Phone (work) Address: 6I0( HWl ^ jSaffHeBOcltv: MtA.zip: SS4^^ Date Property Acquired A4ii^^il^*^itWT(raonth/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. mm mi mm mm mm mm .#• mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mt mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm ^m mm m» mm mm mm M •• m.i mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm ““ mm mm mm mm mm ^m mm ^m mm mm mm mm mm mm mm PRESENT OSS OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $_ _ _ _ _ _ Describe request in detailifltolT HMO HT Nflg> WtOM VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other fcft Fron^(3o H#) Lot Width Front Srf _ _ Hardcover Side So Rear) ' nrjrnjn C'f WItUnccrrc VI I A Vim V i ysr AAm J. / w* « V V vriik’ VtVi » ^ T1 j3 • f A lAV A I A• A f )A / V V /OA vu/ ii.*:./ / V HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; AfTHUCtfttJO _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ DESCRIPTION OF UNDSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions pre.venting compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _ _ _ _nTKw n^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. SJcetches or plans of floor and elevation views. 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11* X I?" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not cf—plete if the ahove information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide :ill information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agreos to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and UUJyrect to t^e^est of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to thxs application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for^"purposes of investiga tion and verification-Of, this req^s^ - Owner's Signature — Date Applicant must have all submittals Into the tv offir^ec tho f f SCHWARZ / WEBER ARCHITECTS 3952 LOUISIANA AVENUE SOUTH • MINNEAPOLIS • MINNESOTA • 55426 (612) 926-1156 June 22, 1990 Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Ms. Mabusth: Enclosed you will find an application for a front yard set back variance from 100’ to 63’. We have worked very hard to complete a design that would reduce the amount of variance requested. At this time we are submitting: 1. 2. 3. 4, A competed application form with check for fee Certified property owners list within 150’ Plat map Topographic survey Due to the death of my father-in-law I will submit site plans, grading plans and other site data the first part of next week. We are requesting that the front yard set back which you indicated is 100’ be reduced to 68’. Most of the home would be set back at a distance greater than the 68’ point. We have worked hard on the design of the home to hold it as far from the property line as possible. As you can see from the topography, the site falls off quickly to the east and notth. The slopes required that the home be placed at the top of the ridge. This means, in turn, that the home impose on the 100’ set back line. We require no other variances on the site. The site topography and extremely dense vegetation cause Mr. McCloud hardship in siting his home. The home is large (approximately 11,000 S.F.) and has been designed to take advantage of the site conditions and vegetation. It is important to us to maintain as rr.uch of the vegetation as possible. <1 1 RICHARD I SCHWARZ N E I I W t B E R ) \ N D R t L A I O N D R E b S I ^: ii Jeanne Mabusth Page 2 June 22, 1990 1tJ D l3 It should be noted that although the westerly edge of the property is designated as the front yard, it really does not function as a front yard. Since there is no public right of way. In reality, the site has two side yards. The site is unique in that way. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, SCHWARZ/WEBER ARCHITECTS, INC. *• ^ V 1 ^ • / I , « y ,VW J Neil Weber, A.I.A. NW/sk Enclosure o RUN DATE 06/20/90 BATCH 007 PROP AOOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 3B 06-117-23 11 0003 04246 DAYSIOE RD VCl CAPITAL INC VCI CAPITAL INC PO BOX 375 L0T{6 LAKE HN 55556 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 30 06-117-23 11 0004 04050 DAYSIOE RD G A H COtOIELL GARY D CONNELL 4050 DAYSIOE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 18 38 06-117-23 11 0006 04010 BAYSIDE RD CURTIS & ELIZABETH LEVATT6 CURTIS & ELIZABETH LEVAN6 4010 DAYSIOE RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 o o o PROP ADOR OmEH NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 06-117«23 12 0003 0^355 BAYSIDE RD VCI CAPITAL INC VCI CAPITAL INC PO BOX 37S lotto LAKE m 55356 30 31-110-23 0002 0<)025 NATERTCnOJ RD J S & P D RICE JEROME STANLEY RICE 4025 HATERTOtai RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 31-118-23 41 0003 04045 HATERTOVe^ RO EARL N DORN ETAL EARL N DORN 4045 HATERTOfW RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 V 4i PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR 0»«4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 31-118-23 41 0004 04105 HATERTOI^ RD D GIGUERE & A GIGUERE JOE a PAM SAHClIUK 4105 HATERTOkir^ RD MAPLE PLAIN HN 55359 38 31-110-23 43 0008 04300 BAYSIDE RD SCIIUTZ-O’NEILL CORPORATION SCMUTZ-ON4EILL CORPORATION 1015 TOf^AMA RD lotto LAKE m 55356 38 31-118-23 41 0011 04115 HATERTOWN RD MICHAEL R a MARY E PLAt4K MICHAEL R a MARY E PLAfAC 4145 UATERTOini RD MAPLE PLAIN m 55359 38 31-118-23 44 0003 00038 ADDRESS UtiASSIGNED STATE LAND DEPT STATE LAND DEPT TOR SALE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OHNER ONLY 38 31-118-23 43 0003 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED DANIEL C PARTEN DANIEL C PARTEN 1015 TOfa<AWA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 31-118-23 44 0004 00038 ADDRESS UTMSSIGNED THOMAS E REIERSGORD ETAL THOMAS E REIERSGORD 4500 H 44TH ST MPLS M^4 55424 o 0 o ' - PROP ADDR OM4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 31-118-23 44 0005 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGT4ED J S RICE a P DRAKE RICE JEROME S RICE 4025 HATERTO^OI RD MAPLE PLAIN m 55359 TOTAL BATCH 007 00013 ) ^4 J RUN DATE 06/20/90 BATCH 007 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT UO. PI435A0I PAGE 19 0 o 569 C:) 0 '■3 ^'5 '0 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE Of4 THE RECORDS OF THE HEfitiEPIN COUNTY OEPARTMEW OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF DATE ♦ - o ■% CBStofe- op Miww iT«« • MM Mil • *t*M MM«m mi MMiM «m«* t^m» •»•••■ •» iMjf • M*W MMM If* MM MM •WMM KM** MM*M •. MM’ MM wmii mm M MM ••»••• MMIM ». MM* mm • —Ml MM*M MM M «4M« «M.MM-?MM.M-.. «M IMMI M «M> 0» M»M MM MM^MM •M* “ -- rxj 'ns.rsL-T M tiMi I— . mmmI m—. — « *• •'*•* ‘TSLr’ssi-r •* -- sr.LrSi*:sr » mM —M*c;:u' • »»*»*•• M •«• M mtmm • 'M»m M I— •• l« I I 4 . ,,. -* ** ' ■ , ‘ • • ■ '' • il|ii»»iii»'git! jBiiiiwi4ii<iwi ■. . •*: • '•'- •* I rniT^tm - Ci.iV M9 i i '•W A - ■ ; ,"11 ffffiS' / / . /afnti '' J—ZyiiiiiLoourMtlB IffyfjLiTv^^ t 1 j . 944 ; !;55,s:rt« n*:to 04 1.01 • 8 I \ f««r**0« 8tv41»*sir \ \\ - \ te \ ' *•..' •«*’ vf ^ i ' ■ [if ^ II \ ••4 WTV9V / ' X T 34 J-^ Cn licrri I or *xi i8«»i»vo 0*110 on ^ ««OM8rwt £«M«r< lOik € tOV^MIO :fl««rwo OSlYiANM 100 WLOiPt I Ht ooo««i o« ••« oti*of«ao^ or VMi oiorv omou it roi.i.o«m m ia«*ootio« or nm oooooito ooi* «N-^ <s \ - ',jv\ V ■' y I fi T'ri -^V- x2^W if• «x»o^<saf O JO If CAiCMC^T V I I r ^ PLAT THE MARSH AT LAFAYETTE L>^ ORONO/MlWffiTONKA BEACH. »«NNESOTA , _________ #1555 V *1/^' .\-V \ «* p.- •■. r-.1 - -'.vv ~ V lV^*- 'a**, ^i wmmm -••• • t;. .T. •aTa.'ic • - - ■ • owKirr™ -ii^*** V ' / —V< '' / ^ j =4- ;* / A^rr-.- \ i I la. —. i I “ >6 c. a ___< V i! 31 iiii •»' *.•9* • H: ranEsrt, « «M«4 I I i I "I P.fi.m4r| "^111*190 Urr iMt MLAMUMQEMEMT PON JOANME OfUMCS or urrt 1 * t. ouKK \ mc haniy AoomoN HtPMCNW COUNtV. MMNI901A i tM« • M * IMM • « •• nmuiiBuraBeaN. •sjar2!.n:::srr::.r-u-'.-v.'-' r.*=r4,*v •0 lo«« M *• 9* • 9m» «• tOVNO ■»< Nf •« »•*• NM > »•«•• • • m «>»*•• ••• tamm•» •• mb •• «» mo to« 9 M UiMM A o»M *m MMMlf M <«l « W Mn»4 • i»M >M • « ••M M M» • &• M O**# • «M «•»« M»N« mma% r >MM# MM Mpo oMM* «m MM M M MiM M M# mm » •» • Im#tsnni'i:;;.*y2s^— **• HWM • wm '•• a- »«•»• * MM ' M ‘M •n* IM »•m ^ •—••—coawm t owowma twc. , lAMD tWYtYQNO Pt ANW lONO lAM. WMOOIA M'X.vQ^ II 1^190 u/tummjmiunmmmnmjOAtmomiu mum i i i. 1I6CIIV lie HAMfv AOdrnoN MOMKPW COUNT V. MMNUOtil fWStttfiN «i»r*sp ssra . rrj^^*WI gTixPu; J.xs»i «• M ^ * ««•* evM »»«• !■» It I ^1 m9 *•• «m Vi»« w iowo< «• «• l» «i«»» « WKiPOio— ^ « • W* m»m • I—iit < > >OT* «ft •«»COFFIN A QRONBIRa INC. tNOMCN*. LAND •URVtWNik iVANMMI U«WUU(S.I #1564 rrwi AMD CAMW CAMHI -cmnyi cATEor somwt ™ “WlWhO ,. T. C. ntTPAca aoM ABBA BABOBVarA • ta f»• n ta »M f l.tM ft 1 tM 1* «M isi%•At '*~**''^ —to? w—’ /*- ‘ 1^ i.or .■* / / / ✓ IWWUl^^ t/a*tm t« L««a ».!.» mt «. ofToriuji uuu m—a"w—A. alMMBOr*. (o ita ^(al tlM»t*of oa f (la o« of tw*^4 l« I ha off lea of l»a •a^iaiai of Da»<a la and fo« a*i4 CwHMf. ••94 BMfMa arw «*l9al«« i« •at 14 Cf”*' IM 99*99 tflUMtad ta 9—99M9 IM Mt9«tat apat !«• a««p9Mtf «paH •t9««tl«9l IM aiattM* «r*ia*49 • 1IM9 Aaaaiaa atafad taatataa Itaaa Aaaafa *ai9«ia« faafataa tap at taaa4a«taa atav. * aaaaaaat flaar ala*. • parapa ftaat alaa. a ^4 O VI 4i» I Aataaf «a9tlff laai laia aofvay. ptaa o# rapoit ata 9«ap**a4 *9 a* 09 aadae ay air*a« aapaaatataa aad taat i aa a Paty aaaiatafaa UaaP aaraayaa aaPaa laa laaa of «ka •«*•* a« «4 ^ 7'iA^ .. Ma. aiaawi r • »■ %aaa H.f; * aa MiH B r*rtiric«f« er s«r,», f«r !•♦»• M ft or tM »« % «r soctioo $.ttrn COoAtf. mOAOtOtO Ji45* WHfttMiia o» ft—ttfta #1554 •' *!• *•'* •• •»• •» »«t or tM fto«to.o,t irTL-r.'-' n;.s:rs ru-c.nrA.-rs-.i.-nr.Ti.s <*»*»• • *•««•<••. lac. » «<>••»«,>, n». ^•«r «» »0<M “to-tni I i»o«. toot* t lack • •• foo« lolo Jim #J. i«o« o Iras aaroar lat • l»o« aarOO' raaaa kooriaat t»««a a'O Oa»*0 • iftaSM «ataa •too to V- ^ ^ r'-i' 'i^' ■- Mk m^'W:. ’Pt'P'* ■' >“■■'• ; rHtnntpjn County, MlnntjM^a.^^ -■ - I eita’^.cs^ asi '!?JhsMi w LAICt nmuiTftHKA Cl€t * 1^ 4--^ y.-? \ I _^ l/i I«»ef’?r/f%>^.^?5?n; ^ ^># * 70 p:d^»jr m*^tu 4*0 '-lO . *■ ^1 ^ itifc « a.o * am r \ ---------- •r»* • i^ptr> ■« « ? Oatf :.7-6-85 , Scalt; !• • 0 : Iron aarktr f'''" > ■’ Jfcrift ‘ H- , j*4 ‘'»^ar?-:iife-;^ . COFrlN I 6R0NBER6. INC. EnginMPl.Survtyo’rs ( Land Plann* Long Lik#. Mlmieto^ ^ I I V n \ i. 1 .•v,i r •. #/S57 I *!6sn 1 #15^ f- ■ I I I #1559 Jin ’.•• * »Lu ' ,4'i^* A. ■<L • • ri A1 T « - ‘aim* T -----------^<7 0 pwr tr» *1^1 ara1 ..r». w -•tv » I I i ' [l\ AJ otU v A P C rY\4<) #1559 01 HlO#- I r i_j «i •*«»•«•* 4m*.* __ 0 •=4t .□ II "4»1 ****^ '• II I u»««^<«i*^ J ^*1 ” «*r • ••J 4 ta^<««« A. (v^xf^e-siL I \ fi.\-. v-v\ ■tiwr'.-'Ni Itemcwvwwrd V iv t « .'-2 I I P C. rnHj. ^1^59 ^Uvahon I" I I I I T ■r '♦L * • ftf 'flSs A* «.AA 4___ .I. 4./ • 99 0 «W MS.Tr E^E ^ATinti %%. Alf^ „^. i>«i «ni 4k.i «k k« VJ -j »y>.Jhi»a ft V ftab. M »l —^ 4 /•••••■ “J* ■■■•'* ft / tTt 1^ p':=:r.lJ li • ^ I I co *i 1 ni-,Slj 1^-1 ■ I I I ■Wl ■p.C rvM^ #1563 Ml « «MM V M»«U •• m»m • mmmk w. ...‘vii:*— I I f, t / / CM.6 r^zo r>n«v-r iK:» >«/iUlCA^<" f^l>r i I I r ^ MW /so, ^ '7-/<0-fo pi („4, Miv«»tC M Ci^'-nr) I I UrtiriMM »r t*r tSMU* m4 U* I* !•« It tl«v« 9, fMali* »t Nr« ■mmpi* Cm»V|, HilMMU I law if carliff INti t*^U U • Um rwr^ri MfMWBtoUM 9f ■ MPMjr •f tte Iwiwfiit— *r fial «C tot 1( 9, IlMMtu »f faiwpln Nvi IwtoMag MrtJ— mf torltof* •<*»«•. mm toMTitoi M fitl«««l toMPMti* «t «to patot «r totowMtt*- •f ttw torilwrtf tlM •r «M n^MMrMaf •# t^ Ov<wt iMiNira iallMf Qwwf Mttli tto »Mttortf mf «to «t*l4liif tiM totMW tot* t Mf > !• Mto ■Mi », twiitto UafM Nr%| t*M»« MpW atoM !»• tlM i^MM Mto toto I Mf t Mf MM «*V«rM, • af m.u fMtl tkMM atrVMMUrl/ MTImII*. rt^t «t M M«to M*M' tmm U>«■MarrlMf *Mrr« » f|*u*M 9m ^Mt to IM Mt«it Mtot •' toft*^M tM tfMi mf iMf to to fMPrttof i IMm* tortoMttorl/ toriMUM rt^t at M Mfto mt 1^^^* fpm u»t. fMartMf MMM • f**VM« mf m tm*: toMM >*toM«to •rtf • ftatoM* m' tof.i fMt to • frto* |» to- torVwrlf llM mf Mtf rtcitoA'-Mf •* Vto toMt tmr%mr» totlmf CMMff. to IM Mi*t I* m fMt torttoMtorl^ *«••%*•' alMf tor toritoft. IIm mf pt|ii-rr«*r fn* tor tatttot Mtrt mf »rr*i»« »-*r^» Umm* ■M.W-fto*lr «Urf r.U tortoMif »i^to*r.Mf IIM II fMtl toM*« t-n^«to*lf l» r •tortfM IIm tot.f tort to tto *«tw*t Mlrt •* WiIm|p(i alM *11 ttot M*t *f tot I to MtJ ftor» I l«t'r to*.MM tor •»rtorr*»r*l* mt »•» f*»rfii«r r-f tto «*M»rv •* toM MMrtrrar. rto Mt-rr- l*r i«>. »f *MttoMto r»l» rM r*v«*M**r«to *IM Itor* •* «k- <rr*l*r< to**l*«to»« *|».« Mrr»ito«, tr«*t*«r *ito all pltrfi** rt(to*, ar*r«UMr mmt MltoltoM a*MrtoM»t to tto ator>-trMitta-f tto*t •' ?*? f^ fff tototrftoto •* toTMlMaf tor^r M*^ trriraiM *MMM a* , MTitoM rnmmmm rrw *Mrlrf, f»*-rtlrf *• rrttorai >»*m»*I*< at t * M|*t * !*.?****!!*****■ ^ *’» tortoMt/ IIM mf tor fict^r-mm, mf to« torrt to*t-*M yt«y toMMf toto to-, tototoartf rtor-torr mt ta* ftotol.^ IIm tot "Malta mt UaiffM Nr»i tonra srrto>r.i-»t. r u—tovi I aaf Km« 9. V to>MM to**toMl»rl/ mUrnm tto fr#«ar*l/ li«r ** «»M a ftaiMM af ■ ??^**?**^ ®**^**^ a flrtor-r mf fto.i fMt to tto r*tMl Mtto mf taviratr# mt toart af Larf ?T****?*» *^**T**_v!*? *"**>>* '*•’ ftot itotoafi •!•• tMttolft- all tor* pmmf to mi< tot 1 t/tv totMM M MtMa* IM torftortf atoMriM to tto to*ir.|« aM towtaM»tr*«f *<•* liMt to tto prwfiM toMS-i-'aM •»a r l«»tiMa atoartoaMt Mrrwto, «aau>rUatf tort tMTMto a« fllr Mt •' M*Mf to tto flMt faarrtto*. torattor toto all rlaarlM aMfrtir... •» MM atto* to-lttof tortrrif t.* »-» tto*M*. arrM^tra to tto , tonrr af tto tofl'tor af ttof* U -to *a- •.•a *m»M. Itof* C Iftof iHitoMtorIf mt a I«m fraa» na* tto1. ^ a____ r »• »• toafMtf ttM mt mU liari C..to ^ ^ af tM#t e, to a ^a« to tor tototoaaftorla ttaa mt mM tMrt f mt tto tHtoartf mmtmm mt ftaai C, toftatorra toM torM* to. ifa. rita* mt topiviraa U faat ■arto af tto «* fto« tofttoaiti •t HUM, Cweif af ffi tto t^iiM a# all «iiaUto tolMtto»It faM art to ato« atoar laarniiaMto ar aa» •tola* I* a «l* toto I a * tf« totoaaf toltoto toto taatato pvt mf Tmh C, ■Mtof to.. 4ft mmm » ramt r®.. pp. toMirta |*a> tM Mto r-to, tlra-rpt^ »- . 1. *' I I ••• Ky M> •» «f IMt I M • tvly '•filtV'M (Mil !»«••*•» «M l«»i ••««' IM (••« •* t««i* •* j •**• \, tr****** M«. ■•. •!>%♦ { U»f UiC. r> I #1566 l-l(j>-^0 P. C. *>' :rj iiMi wtrtt»tiw »g m»im i»wn» !•« I. t(M« t, *%••• •III tvvlftvtf. M9M«»|a C« ■!••* n O t* r-o w >• II 7 U Vr-tj: I I Tjwsrr Wr*«f far J*«* taarirfr •ffcrt I. tiM* I. •III trviMM •»««••*• C« Sim* tcair; t lacr • ft f«*i ••tr ■ f««r It. ifto • s lr«« Mriivf tMri»«t «»«•• ar* »•*•« •• tltaaM ««taa m I I #10 PrewB KP>u.« • fiM^arr ^ mat^ fC, ^ M#r nr^«#ti Mf* mim4 *« 14^' \«tfiNaR & MSANH 4 AR »fl|< IS sjsr^xi I I 0>V A '*«:.‘v- IjliMllI ^"3r^&G cDD^a v^r- Ct/»^s ce) f >- I I Ill \ I i ^1566 1- ik> yc ' V / ► * 2JBhr g.C(/-«rigU _ 1.. #1566 n r'd. />)t9 I I I I 1 I I I -» •• »- • — • • \j-j- U- ~<m r » - ■< ji r"r“...... jjMA«aOOM 9 • • • =» * ■• • • • s N I^ • 4•» * •»» ■»—»— X. nr SI ^ - IS'.S-S)' .1 a>fsip9 7-»to-«>oPc \ \ r-.--' i . > ’ ■'r= 1 \. m'I I ■^■?3;K=25R • « •iTNUil^y WCTIflW Ifllt-ai #1339 .2? Vr% I I 'SSimmik. -j.ite-qo ^C. ;3!niEIS4S<! ISXB i: .'X -~Tt:7\-« ■ I r I ------4 — r I — • *•