The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06-18-1990 Planning PacketPLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 18, 1990 7:00 P.M. 1275 BRONN ROAD SOOTH - COUNCIL CBAMPLRS COONCIL RFPRB8BNTATIVE - Alan Nettles ATTENDANCE PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 p.m. #1536 Steve Gardiner, 3770 Bayside Road - A) Vacation of Public Right-of-way B) Variances 2. 8:00 p.m. #1551 Robert Waade, 998 Wildhurst Trail - Preliminary Subdivision ACTION ITEMS Review of these items will commence between scheduled public hearings. 3. #1465 Gerald McCourtney, 1055 Ferndale Road West - Variances - Referral Back to Planning Commission 4. #1512 Steven Ruce, 4625 West Branch Road - After-the-fact Conditional Use Permit - Continuation of Public Hearing 5. #1527 Lyndon S. Bill Stubbs, 2555 Fox Street - Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing 6. #1532 Fullerton Properties, Inc., 2225 6th Ave H - Preliminary Subdivision - Continuation of Public Hearing 7. #1537 Calvin Presbyterian Church, 177 Glendale Drive - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing 8. #1538 Lauren Born, 1432 Shoreline Drive - Variances - Public Hearing 9. #1539 David Filkins, 3905 Shoreline Drive - Variances - Public Hearing 10. #1540 Julienne & Ronald Prineas, 1980 Heritage Drive - Renewal Variance - Public Hearing 11. #1541 Dr. Roby & Jane Thompson, 1520 Tanglewood Road - Variance - Public Hearing 12. #1543 Richard C. Reed, 1000 Old Long Lake Road - Variances - Public Hearing 13. #1544 Roger i Becky Berry, 1392 Baldur Park Road - Renewal Conditional Use Perrait/Variances - Public Hearing PLAMMING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY# JUNE 16, 1990 7:00 P.M. ACTION ITEMS CONTINUED 14. #1545 Dain s Janet Rodwell, 258 Cygnet Place - Variances - Public Hearing 15. #1546 Scott & Sarah Prochnow, 4075 Highwood Road - Renewal Variances - Public Hearing 16. 11547 Metropolitan Waste Control Conunission, Intersection of West Ferndale Road & Shoreline Drive Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing 17. #1548 Julia S. Jensen, 2700 Ethel Avenue - Variances - Public Hearing 18. #1549 4 1550 Rod Crawford, 4705 North Shore Drive - Conditional Use Perinit/Variances - Public Hearing 19. #1552 Steven 6 Renee Foster, 1800 Shadywood Road - Variances - Public Hearing SKETCH PLAN REVIBN 20. #1533 Richard 4 Julie Marklund, 3415 High Lane - Sketch Plan of a 2-Lot Subdivision ADDITIONAL ITEMS 21. Planning Commission Approval of Minutes of May 21, 1990 Meeting 22. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the July 9, 1990 Council Meeting. ADJOaRNMBNT CITY OP ORONO 'i 4 PUELIC ATTEMDANCS 0t lV\i/\(j(_ l>in/)U4^Ci>f\ MSEVING DATE ?V^.aSE fill out the INFORIIATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print! ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1 • tv / H 1' T t* / >/ V / ) tc 5 A 2.T)7C ftl 3. 7^^ X ^ /_Tf.' 4. c . ^/fn ,-r 5.' t> ^ l-lc . ' • ■* 6. J ^7'4.2 7. C r ./p:t <7 ’,7-^ 8. /flfc 1 . ii': -vy- /£j ■; • ?(-./ f 0 ‘L i-'yir 9. /f" / C ^7 / /'C si f < ■ -- /X' aZt;. 10. u/aK*^//'c'. />' > */' ^ 5^/:;,:, /^t irC ^' /sT/ (U/^L'A's"^/4o .'C/L.t/'/UU^i f P> I 'j. L/ /- S‘V <? jA 12. A JcmT '^IA4/s-'l <■- 1. /'!/>*/ s -; ' 13. 14. 15. 16. 1 7 - IH . 19. 10. Toj Planning Conunission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Conunission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Proas Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator Date: June 11, 1990 Subject: #1536 Steve Gardiner, 3770 Bayside Road - Alley Vacation - Setback Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IA, Single family lakeshore residential, 2 acre, vnsewered Applicationt A) Request to vacate 30* alley adjacent to property. B) . Request for side and rear setback variances to construct main floor and 2nd story additions. List of Exhibits / A - Street Vacation Application B - Variance Application C - Plat Map D - Property Owners List E - Applicant's Letter of Request F - Survey G - Construction Plans H - Hardcover Review I - Letter to Applicant 10/29/86 J - Septic Capability Diagram for Vacation of Alley - Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit •t I • Request 1, Applicant's property consists of 4 tiny of^^Ottoville on Lake Minnetonka, platted in 1887. That plat extended to the west side of the alley in question, therefore, if this alley is vacated, its ownership is split down the middle between the property In this case, the west half would go with Outlets C and D of the plat of Bayside Landing, and east half would go th applicant. 2. There are no City utilities within the alley, and none proposed. Municipal sewer contemplated for this area ^ou Sot make use of the alley. Staff is « verification from other utility companies as to existing expected use of the alley. Zoning File 11536 June 11, 1990 Page 2 of 4 3. Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.12 requires that vacation of an alley requires a petition by the majority of the land owners abutting the property to be vacated. Technically, there are four property owners abutting this alley, as can be noted from the plat map. Therefore, technically, the vacation cannot proceed until at least two more abutting owners join in the petition. Technically, Mr. Burger at the end of the alley would not gain any land, but the other three owners would. 4. One of the concerns of vacating the alley is whether it will limit access to other properties. Currently, all properties abutting the alley have their main legal access at some other location. The only property that could conceivably benefit from this alley would be that of Hazel Anderson, directly north of Gardiner, which does not abut a public or private road, except that her property abuts Outlot C of Bayside Landing, a driveway outlot to serve a new residence north of the wetland. Also, Mrs. Anderson presumably has an easement across John Burger's property along Gardiner's north lot line, to use the driveway shared by Gardiner and Anderson. If Mrs. Anderson has such an easement (this must be verified), vacation of the alley would not deny her access. 5. The Public Wor)cs Director notes no problems with allowing the vacation. II. Variance Application - 1. Applicant is proposing to construct a second story addition and eastward expansion of the existing house, in addition to revising roof lines. This house is currently considered by staff as a 2 bedroom house, and is proposed to be converted to 3 bedrooms. 2. Exhibits X, Y and Z indicate the allowable building envelope under 3 scenarios: a) the existing property; b) the existing property plus half of vacated alley; c) existing property plus entire alley. In each case, expansion of the house eastward requires a setback variance to allow a north lot line setback of 4* where 30* is required. Zoning Pile 11536 June 11, 1990 Page 3 of 4 A variance would similarly be required for conversion of the deck on the south side of the house to a screen porch, since portions of that deck are less than 30* from the north lot line. Side street lot line setbacks would be required also under tne first 2 scenarios. If applicant acquired the entire alley, his house would be at the 50' Landmark Drive. required setback from 3.Hardcover within the existing property boundaries is within the prescribed limits. However, much of the driveway and existing garage are outside of applicant's property. The most reasonable and consistent method for determining a hardcover percent would be to presume that applicant will gain half of the alley, and credit him for his existing property, half of the alley, and the area of his improvements that occur outside his property. This is shown in Exhibit H. Having spent more than an hour reviewing hardcover numbers on this application, my estimation is that the proposed additions per the architect's plan, fall within the letter and Intent of the hardcover ordinance under the assumptions noted above. III. Discussion - Septic System Concerns The existing system is extremely substandard, even after drainfield additions that were done in 1907. Those additions were done on an interim basis (see Exhibit I). There is one relatively smal' septic tank, and approximately 400 square feet of drainfield. Making reasonable assumptions about the Kilkenny loam soils mapped in this area, one would expect a perc rate of 30-45 minutes per inch, requiring 300 s.f. of drainfield per bedroom. The proposed 3 bedroom house should have 900 s.f. of drainfield, but less than half of that exists. It is unlikely that the existing system could be upgraded to serve a 3 bedroom hotje within the setback and design requirements of the septic code. Prom Exhibit J, expansion area is very limited, even with additional land from the alley. There would not be room available to develop a mound system if soil conditions indicated one was required. No testing has been submitted. Based on this, staff would not recommend approval of expansion of this house to 3 bedrooms unless municipal sewer was available. A decision by the City Council whether or not to sewer this area is still pending. Zoning File 11536 June 11» 1990 Page 4 of 4 Staff Recu—endatlop - Regarding the alley vacation, staff would request tabling pending the following additional submittals: 1. Petition signed by a majority of the neighboring property owners for vacation of the alley. 2. Verification that the Hazel Anderson property has a legal easement across the Burger property (and the Gardiner property) to Bayside Road. 3. Confirmation of no objection from the utilities which may currently or potentially use this alley. Regarding the setback variances. Planning Commission should consider whether expansion of this house entirely within the 30 rear yard setback is appropriate, or whether applicant should consider expansions southward away from the north lot line. Finally, staff would recommend that the proposed expansion to create a third bedroom (or the potential space for a thirc bedroom), not be approved until such time that municipal sewer is available to the property. Alternatively, applicant should provide septic testing and design work to show that this can support and develop a septic system meeting all code requirements for a 3 bedroom house, plus an alternate site for equivalent septic expansion. . ^ o . CITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND OSB APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ^770 ^ (0/Qt^n ^ ^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 5"* 11 1'2-^ ^ *i_ Please attach legal description to application if not incTu^5;^'jt'ft^ • !!f- !-f 1®-:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT Phone (home)—^ Name -S"^k/p^ Gd _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Phone (work) 33>0^5~^0 ^ Address ^ 7 70 Rc\ City 7)/0>no _ _ _ OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ■■ Name - Phone - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Address _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ City _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Zip- - - - - Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PEES - CONDITIONAL OSE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee _________ S 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application _ _ _ _ $125.00 Residential accessory Use _ _ _ _ $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _ _ _ _ $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _______ $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _ _ _ _ $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use _ _ _ _ $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more _ " Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore _______ PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS , ^ ._ _ _ _ $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Basement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $250.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $100.00 Appeals Other “ see fee schedule PRSSBHT DSB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify)_ description op request Describe request in detail: p 1/urA.^ 3>0' o^ >>v\ ^ 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. required submittals 1. Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach t separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARB REQOIRBO TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A IWREING COPY (11* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: __________________________ Date_________ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information requir d or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees ,staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date s/Lhi ONMERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building i Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. CITY OP OROHO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) A£ter-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) #1536 PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address !^7 70 6atYS.'iL>. J - mProperty Identification Number (P.I.D.) OtT-li?- 2*? O\Q0 ><£CcS^T-Tf^h' /S/c<t)0) cxi i(Ci no. OioZ c^-'io. OlO'^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Addiess: 3*770 S «.cfoCity; Phone (home) ^7Ci - OZ.S9 ___ Phone (wor)c) __ Zip: 5^‘^SL OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ Phone (home) Phone (wor)c) Address:City:.Zip:. Date Property Acquired {month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT 08B OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Use of Property _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost S Ld 600 • /OOgOQ Describe request in detail: £y«.»v/ weO\ *1 -ftm cTiiti VUIMHCBS RBQOIRBD Lot Area Setbac)c Variances (, Other Lot Width Front __j_ Hardcover Side Rear) BARDSBIP n-scribe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: g cO Q C evct 1 c cv »c/f Au ^ ' OBSCRIPTIOH OP ONOSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: -^x, .. t*. O ^ /D ^ Qjp> « . REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any chznges in existing grade are proposed. S)cetches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 2. 3. 4. 5. e. 1. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A MORRING COPY (11* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not coaplete if the above Infor—tlon has not been includ^. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best tf his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's Signature Date s/(^A OMHBRS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ac)cowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Cuilding & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. Z (we) J-‘: -| i Adjacent Property C^^rs* Ajby^>^r^nti^TniS f (j^KiQfXCE B. of sns S/M Si OP. /^O [print addrea^[print nameTslJ have reviewed the plans for the proposed iaprovement or proposed use of the property located at SlTC iC s/?i3 also referred to as Land Use Application No. » I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plana and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner m Date c / fro Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building t Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. 8t "-“I* '4 0 •• O Ml d-m a t *8 S^ w in t4U»H p >5 ] M ? w 2s* 'issp! 1:3w> _ llii K < W !•# M « Q Q If) Mlr Sasa Jiiii I ! i S |i g 21- o •• O igil a W« W 0( S Piiik s3“SS5 g|:i MSia o ► S3 aS|-> - M Ml '-S'aoSMl Z *-4 OB f0 a ui O iL o g •• ^ S -•«3s = * siaiai o s ce > O O ^ III ^ SS§| s kIss S-* -5e*ri*S-asr- in ■>. z S«a°r‘"S siSiii s| N a < uil|li w 3 ii = :i"*3^ S Ml Ml _ «s» ft Ml 2I o ft ft o SisaasMii iSs! us ii a ; = i a ~3h. 2 ^ Ml Ml _ M ft Ml 2 ^ I « oc q eiS' I i) Ml Amt |lii ifil !?3 a a S 7gSS«J ^ O O P M ft ft ft Vi MlI 3S|3 •a^Sfog a8-s::aA O M M Ml ^ ^--------S 8 a 2i'^ii ®S-.-. 3 asS|S ii fi -I a 2 ii Ml Ml an«,i M »0 lA ft M •*8*=~sas 3 •n Ml ft ft «M ft U U Miissij ft Ml Z Q f«« ft 1.1 2ASSS a-*?®• w m ft o ft Ml ft ft 7g5 “3 ::s«i = 2 ft ft z • »• ft^ z z s ^**lss^5 P O ft ft O ft ft o p a ^ Z o « o ft > e ft ft 0 o ii ft ft O Ml u oa«oz> O Z VI Jasis;;:g ’^SaaS sas^Miz i^SSoS* •« ft ft ft ii Ml 'SrsssasauaS ii?l llli I* p M I I I .•i r-.‘? if'•I- M* • ♦.•••*•, ,. . r Vs; /i,/93 ^ :i*. ;Auuu?vjr^ ?rt>-rr>o'= » 7S*? tl-. ABJboo^ff^ / 3"770 Sk^zttiM f^Ab 2.i.z.y2--',2 -pcnf* C_7r*270 'o. rD - l^z.S'=i<:, 7 y^i r /V7 —)^i ‘S) ^ s ' fey — j>ec< ;0>2.y = ■Z'^v ISO °iO Cooc. 3. >2"^ \f —■/s- , faffjrXQt^ fij(» ifi^ty'ZO.^ - /2-C»—1 2.C. >0/V^U1.1^r Vr^70 — S70 /7sr =?/'2-^1% ou ei>H^57- f',^Ct''u-'r/ , fcrL"! /aJ p/e-^p- /0A2T=7rO//^»'’ ”’‘’ ; *0 o>^3/a> “''<’*0 '" ■*-- ■3>w/<y /N Ht-^^-z.C*7n:>-Qayv>/^-^znt. (*rvLzn-t<=o /AJ juiVP*- |w itliiVj'20.^“’2.C* ’ 6*1 3 /^cxTi«>^vr or l"VC. '•_ . 'pCR. PtftAi frS ’'^'/ 1 N'V ___ s-<>t/<^ j So ______________ Deo^ /ov2^ _______ ____Dc-^ ^ ' Ij^o - 1L9» ■ i' \i ^ «. .< • > .11 L.;-------!____jj ‘i; ■ . \ r iipi'il ' ■■■ ; '-(pv’ ‘r ■'V:::l. ■•: * •. ■*: ■’I -•• • -• i- • . • * ^■ * * ' ..% •• •: *••- 1' . , ,V-i V ^ i \ ■e t ^ ^fea ■■ ■" Ies C •I ' ♦ri* "S *;•••* •r J *1^2 war if-- • - /2, '3S ' /«!*;*. ’^r’'lT^ ‘ ,'‘>3'* ■*’^ •*' • O'* "^T Z J ,i:. -. f> -33 - .'~'y''--^~ \z*l^ .. GiO-<- P‘^r*tr:cri:.. :i/J - o’=‘^ '. 1'2. ;^>3o \T/y 1--V/ C. o '--:=? •“ r^OJ/^t C, » 2.^0 }Z^]0^ - /?.r/C C'K -75-7 8*71 • If^ U 3T 7ro 'i/' 1^‘^try /fj r ... V 1 (ri9.v^»' ^-‘-^ "O ,. ;, C7 JO C> A4iOiT70Aj- '-* / /( 2 5^>' t-v C.C. P<aj€^ = “ J ^ ' -- 2,50 - o' ^ “-21 - "t -J. 2i“0 ' ^0' ^. wv*Ti/2^ •2Sl^ ^ ' 52*?9 '^r ' l^o-r ■eLel^ -B,'S^ /,2,<S" I r 3^^OJA<^ L>o } Lie . r?T -2^r—y ’ ?. '^/Z vr//c-r-A^<^ JZ-»S /^C»i:>^-r70AJr 2^,rZ^O 5 V, iutY. f/6aPo:ctik :T^-.r^O Lcfi^ -S 2-S'2.*) fey/;r7Mj /3ZO i^Lsy 750 7>w^ lAJ ^^A^tytS l^oC '-»‘i*r./vur/ - * lc*» - S^2-0 V >>»jo^A. 7r'“^ro' p/kj^osrCi- r irVi/ // •• CITYofORONO Pou Onicw Box 88*Cryatai Bay. Minncsou U3Z3*Municipal Officaa On the North Share of Lake Minnetonka October 29, 1986 Steve Gardiner 3770 Bayside Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Re: Septic System Repairs Dear Mr. Gardiner: On October 16, I visited your property at your request to review your septic system. I noted the following: 1. There is one septic tank of apparently about 650 gallons capacity. (Code for new systems requires two tanks of 1,000 and 750*gallons respectively.) 2. This tank is located 30' from your well. Well apparently was installed in 1973 with little regard for it's proximity to the septic system. A minimum of 50' well-to- septic tank setback is required by the State Health Department. However, given the 111' depth of your well and the clay layers it penetrates, I doubt that you would ever experience any contamination problem. 3. The drainfield, apparently located east and south of the septic tank, is discharging to the surface and you are correct in assuming that it needs some work. The extent of your drainfield is not known, but I suspecc it is no more than 200 s.f. or so. Your property is located in the Stubbs Bay Sewer Study Area. The City is currently studying the possibility of extending municipal sewers to serve portions of the developed area around Stubbs Bay. Although the City has not reached any conclusion on where sewers will go and what properties will be served, I see your property as a likely candidate to be sewered, and it would be unwise and unfair to require you to replace your system with a totally conforming system if it will not be needed in a very few years. aUtLDINC a ZONING - 473-71S7 ASSESSING ADMINUTRAnON a FINANCE - 47J 7358 FUBLICV»OKKS - Steve Gardiner, 3770 Bayside Read October 29, 1986 Page 2 of 2 Given these facts, and given that you are concerned about your septic system surviving the winter, it seems appropriate that you install some additional drainfield as an interim measure. It appears that you could install one or two drainfield lines, running north-south, to the east of your existing drain- field line, using drop boxes. You probably will be able to add from 200-400 square feet of drainfield. It appears that this new drainfield can be placed so it will be well above lake level and will be at least 50* from your well. Considering that this is an interim measure, we will not require soil testing. You should be aware that even if you do add drainfield, the system will not be considered as meeting all current code standards for a new septic system. In order to be totally in compliance, you would have to 1) install new precast concrete tanks meeting a 50' setback from your well; 2) have soil testing completed and construct a drainfield system based on the soil and water table conditions on the site, and being at least 75' from the well. I think it is unlikely that you could construct a totally conforming system on your small lot. I am enclosing a list of contractors licensed with the City to install drainfield systems. Your contractor must obtain a permit before commencing work. Please contact me at 473-7357 if you have any questions. Michael P. Gaf^ron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator MPG/tln Enclosure - Sketch - List of Licensed Septic Contractors To • Pl^nniin ifo/ivni-x,ioi\ ^ OfOiW U^t) LOOrUii i/]trxbli<, /7C Oi^tvi rt.: f)lxj\hocliCOii KlXVA/'lO^' Ll^Ui) a. tia^’Jx'K <.>S^S (v/ (LhVXianie^ Tdtn pid. Li‘i 4:, {iifhulf jX'Sdi('T~ (YU.J f>iUnc( i tWxA is £Aa. . JT T -ipnit vp, Iwd QiUkp cLu kjc</u\^'iiidsc- N>^p.ubA /Lj''Mia.'.xt OUA Piouih^ h WtUi lits Pibut pihpo • ^idu 'k> hOTILp /Utt-' Vj’ /i<- LMt/^vh-j i'-ecow^^ J-lieXi tAM^l aitHicf c'^ Mu \i<ni) Sk-ALi l/'CUidiia -ftv Ihiu 'Ao''-^ ■ ^ ls4xn 'X'Aicciw Mixp (i Ikdiui ^ lciLm< 'iAn 'kiu o) Mu.' Uc CiAui Alu /ktbcicl /yMUduvs. OdituuDuO tjbYxrMxicti^y^. U-kt'^lV cU^b fcximv 0te. O aiA Q^/jOlXi Mu- (oizl'iML'O^iOry. L41vLC.J''i'-'^0'^(-t~ \JCI\JL. ^Z>M /of /MU’S. CttVLiCi'- iiK. (KL\ (Wt Jibtnti-Coi. ■|^ he I’liAmws -Itv o:nsinichh\^ "X [^Iua/- Chi\ U ic>\/^usJi Clf . U jl A u tkn as K-O'ws- 1'*''' Ji4ecuhi:C (X'X^ei SucA as -f^uiUo fUuL lb it«-t . \A/fi. K^iau _ him (Ht\ lunu-f c\fpiCP4-{ ntdUx^ oiv ^OA. ~fivv i'ZtW-n6Ltf [vo/iu. ^ iiAto. 7>jhhio iTi-'.'W'i 1'1'U‘w. w/i(i ^u. a^ipiov^ : Azvtt ^!IU l '^1 ~/i/)k^ 1 C CTlSt CWa •^=/W'Ltv I ATot Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Proa: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Dates June 13» 1990 Subjects #1551 Robert Waade, 998 Preliminary Subdivision (Class 3) - Public Hearing Zoning Districts LR-IB ^ .Total Area ■ 6.54 Acres Wetlands = 1.304 Acres Dry “ 5.23 Acres Pertinent Ordinance Chanter 11# Class 3 Subdivisions# Section 10.55# Subdivision 15 (AW - Minimum lot are. may be divided by flood fringed land, wovided at lease 1/2 acre of land not within the protected area is included in one contiguous parcel and both municipal legal access is available to that building site without encroachment on the protected area. Please note - dry buildable lot area calculations on preliminary plan have been listed incorrectly and should be Reversed in order. Lot 1 consists of 1.19 acres above the 931.5. Lot 2 - 1 acre# Lot 3 - .51 acres and Lot 4 - .61 acres. Section 10.24# Subdivision 5 (B) - Lot width variance required. Lot 1 - Required - 140' to rear of front street setback line Fteposed “ 68' Variance - 72' or 51.4% Lot 2 - Proposed - 121.4|^ Variance » 18' 6 or 13% List of Badiiblts Exhibit A - Application Exhibit P - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Map^^of* Proposed Road Improvement and Location of Affected Property Owners . , ^ # Exhibit E - Map of Existing Right-of-Way (Highview Lane/Wildhurst Trail) Exhibit P - Flood Plain Elevation Designation on Plan Zoning File #1551 June 13, 1990 Page 2 Exhibit G - Park Dedication Fee Ordinance Exhibit H - Preliminary Plat Beview of Current Application - lot Configuration Each of the lots the required area areas/ tnve" o°pe 1/2 «« l‘o“„"’io’r“°tre reJlftnlnH JS^.^o/ad lakeshore protected area t0-75‘) nay be credited. setha^i:%?rsr;rrponr^vrsirii;e!“it;g^ that the prinicipal Jre s<=he^>>l^ renova 1. Biv\^%"hibit V.“Tll°;o?sesT^^^^^^ proposed above the 931.S- elevation. Access/Road laprove^nts ADDlicant will be responsible for constructing s?andard°s"" The the City. 5^^^^‘^ufahview Lane The current road improvementWildhurst Trail and Highview Lane. north side. Please shows the encroachment of ^ions of Highview Lane review Exhibits D and J* ®® „idth but the eastern portions renain at the 60' total dedicated //messed 1001 has beginning at the east l^°t line of ‘hj PropetVf relocate the Sri-d^^niinriSproved^road within P°ttl°"s o/ /taicated r^ Tf-way and within to the n”?S The revised allowed into the P^®^®*^'"® 4.- immediately adjacent to fiJr^ferUaV^n Vh?VortT%^7e [oif 1^2 Vnd S"'’s"^l°l be vK°tSe new road extension along the Zoning File #1551 June 13, 1990 Page 3 north. Lot 4 shall achieve access at *‘he southeast corner along Wildhurst Trail. Review Exhibit D. Ceitain neighbors along the north side of Highview Lane have asked that the new road section be naned Wildhurst Trail. City staff sees no problem with that, in fact the addresses have been assigned based on the grid system for Wildhurst Trail. In earlier meetings the applicant has discussed a desire to install monuments at the entrance of each driveway. If those monuments exceed 3 1/2' in height, they will require separate variance approvals. Drainage/Wetlands At the time of the sketch plan review it was thought that the wetland would be designated at the flood plain elevation of 931.5. In review of Exhibit F, a wetland at the 931.5' elevation would not be feasible or realistic for the property. If you have the opportunity to get out to the property, review the section of Lot 3 under the 931.5' and you will find established grass lawn areas. Staff has had further discussion with the applicant's engineer on the issue of the wetland elevation. We have asked for the elevation of the culvert that runs under the gravel driveway through Lots J and 4. In addition we have asked to shoot the elevations of the driveway sections between the wetland and the 929.4' elevation. Until the elevations of the culvert and gravel drive are designated, staff cannot determine the impact of the lake elevations on the wetlands. Staff Rec(sndations Staff must recommend the tabling of the application until resolve of the following issues: 1. Final determination regarding elevation of wetlands. Applicant to provide additional topographic information. 2. Preliminary plan to be amended noting the following: a. House to south of Lot 4 to determine average lakeshore setback and correct placement for house on Lot 4. b. Relocated portion of Wildhurst Trail (formerly Highview Lane) no encroachment of private properties to north allowed. Roadway can only be placed within 60* rignt-of-way dedication along west side and within 30' dedicated right-of-way and within subject property. c. Areas of lots to be determined exclusive of road area, areas below the 929.4 elevation and the wetland within Lots 3 and 4 (areas below the final determined wetland elevation). Zoning File #1551 June 13# 1990 Page 4 It should be noted for the applicant that as the subdivision was filed after the May 1, 1990 effective deadline for the new park dedication fees, the developer shall pay 8% of the fair market value of the property at the time of the preliminary subdivision application. Staff has enclosed a copy of that ordinance for the Planning Commission's review and for the developers information. I 5® s3 in itIM II hI 3 flt P «i ly ui K B « i« M llfll I ^ S lu >» §g^M ^ s-*^ ss^ oe 9 B w 1 H kS N 8 « p M Z OO^m'^Qshill #l55l h if s| fj SSSli, Z "S*0^00 o M M M « Z M e o o z §» K UKh|\5 Pff!ji4 -Isii O ^ Ig£' : UI UIs|SS gsfgs = t;8s;S ^ll|ilHs mS88 « I izsis S.^'"5S59 M« ZS-Sr-r§«** «S«2oOsizlii ihi li|i Ifiifs Moaasui p« UI UI ^ 2^ 5SS* ss::2i |lsi llli *2 £ a £ S s -ntUiss.iis £l8i& rrr=-^ S5$ I »- slllir Inl ? --'Si K w M M O • 8 B X j Jiifi o I O ' "at •JTjS-*' i '_J - M o «i u & ^ a 9 "at ly M 8 O ?iS o <« 2^ « O ^ «4 O V) u Sst 5 ^522 §s •A M 2 Q -< S 7g“g88 SMMs O 9 «y 0 9 S2cg;iissss^;^ * * i o u » r Ta §*a St e a s < 1 I aa St ml ai::»i §l:i9 > N 8 9 W Hli a a-I *• !i 11 -at -a ?SMS§ =9S*ls • ^ Ife u aiail^ {||i «i ly 8 ► V on o ii 3 3 Jaa ^gjp 1 aaii if M Ml ^ M =a.-=i Ml O Q ^ lA -at„ M Ml Q •n-at„ 1^ w ly Q M 8 O 2illi s*;! 0 8^ 9 O ^ A O «1 U •I 8 Ml ^ O _ ill! M 8 4 8 tn S 2 al ^ 1 z ^ SK ^ M M O 8 8 8 X Q aiiifi M 8 o 5-:ul K ^8 “SS-t sits s* Stmas o s? Si a a or S alilNl ilsi 9 >* N 8 9 MSSli 8 0^ ta o 2 -at ?gs zH i. -8 0 9^ a§ts ilsi ^ ► N ipl O i) O Z -at„ Ml Ml O M 8 o 2 ilj8 A •‘SO « Ml>• >• ssE Ml o 9 U iiss 8 < Ml S2 -. aSx^tsiiiaa M‘iz— 4 4 _j i “sSi*!alliil I* i s|M"* S w I 2^^-*SaI ^ K s X SsssJg atilii iiil 8 8 Ml|ll S'* ||3 ,L aiiili 3S S f 1D -D1#■ -J mw^Sl^Sio . *r ly tti 9 £ ___ iHlil U::!i f|3a::-SSso ui___^ :3 s2::;S M u. at X wT sags goSS t X -< ->-»SS i s- s O 141 ®5S > ^^ U HI IM ^lUH rs|si Sjnoo^O sliill is -gsSi ^ ^x>>3_ I ^ «J 9 S r^ ^ ^ X ^ °*5S|iSSxSSS - 2 ^ 'o a w » s!,_ S § m O 3 w CITY OP OROHO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address^^^ #-1-5-5 % Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) _ _ _ Please check one - Property abstract or Attach legal description to application. torrens?u£LUF-r-mK YOU APPLICANT Phone (home)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Name ^ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (work) ^JiL Addresst '^'7*^' ~ Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City:..Zips, (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present Use (check) Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Zoning District_ PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) /Existing Units New Units Total Units Units per_ _Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildabl#' Residential Other (specA.fy)_ MimifON MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION "1^' Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List ?f owners within 350* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). ^ * As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that .Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ ■P 4. Date 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. FEES _ _ _ Sketch Plan Review (Class I, :i t III) _ _ _ Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement _ _ _ Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) Pinal Plat Review (Class III) •(Plus any legal or engineering charges) $150.00 250.00 250.00 300.0c ♦ 20.00/Lot 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all Information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay al additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Sicmature^'^*^ Owner's Signature 0.te D.t. -.plicant must have all aubmittals into the City office. J5 .lays before the ^ning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are . * Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is ■*o attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an 1 agent attend in y.'ur place and to advise the Building ft Zoning his change prior to the meeting. JT. '1 OBOINANCS No. 82. SECOND AN ordinance amending SECT^ 11.82 OF THE ORONO OTY CODE REUTTNG TO PARK DEDICATION AND CASH FOR DE VELOPMENT OF LAND. Tho aty Co«8 of mo Cty of Ofono ordans fts follows: Soetlon 1. ^ , Stction 11.82 of mo Ofono Cfy Cods Is hofooy aifionoocJ and Ifto cufroot lot scftodult for pork dodlcotion foos ts oofoby reooiiod^ Soction 2. Soetlon 11.62. PaHa. Ptoyproonds and Ooon Soaeo. A. Undo for Public Uao, Pursuant to Mm* nosota Statutos. (1989). SEciion 462.358. sued. 2b. mo City roquiros ail otrsons. corpo rations Of omof loqai ontuits mat suooivido wiin mo Oty of Orono as a ortroouisiio to aoproval of a lot division, final plat, or do- voioomont of any land proviousiy oiwdod by plat, moios and bounds, or any omor moans. must convoy to tno Cly Of ooo«ait to mo Pub- Bo. for uso as parks, playgrounds, trails, of ODon soaco. a grvon parconiago of mo land bo- tng piatteo or oovoiopod as noromaiitr aotci- fiod. said ooftic.TS to oo aoorovod by me C.ty. in iiou meroof. mo suodivioor sna.l. ai mo oo- tion of mo Cty pay to mo City, for uso m tno accuisiiion. oovoioomont or maimonanco of puoiic barns, piaygrounes. trails, weiiancs o.' open spaces ano coot roiirement sn ccnnoc* tier, witft tno land previously accuireo for suen puoiic purposes, an oourvaiont amount m casn based upon mo fair marnot vaiuo of tno tand to 00 dovoiopod. The form ot ccntnouiion (casn Of land, or any ccmonuiton moroot) snail be oocidod by tno City Council based U50.n tno need ano conformance witn mo Comcronon- sivo plan. 3. Dodicatod Land Rooulfomoms. Any lane to 00 oodicatod as a rocuiromont of tn»s soction snail bo roasonaoty aoaotaoio for mo above public purposes. Factors usoc m evalu ating me aoeoi*acy of proposed cocicated areas snail mciuoo Size, snaoo. tnoograony. oratnager. geoiogy. tree cover, access ano lo- C. Land Dedication Minimum Area. Sub- dividers snail be reouired fo dedicate to me Oty for pants, playgrounds, trails, open sckos ano omer puoiic purposes as a nunimum mat percentage of gross land a*ea. or omer suen amount as may 00 ootormmod by me Ciy Council, as set form ooiow; (1) Reiiceniiai/Agncumjfai/Muittpfo Rosicen- * tial Zoned Land. Oeoicaiion recuiremont of 8 oorcent of me land being platted, subdivided or eaaimg lot of record. (2) Commoraal/lndustnai Zoned Land. Dedicated reoutremont of 8 percent of me land being platted subdivided or existing lot of record. ^^ D. Caen Contribution In Ueu of Lends. In most iftttar>cas wner# a cash contnbution Is to be made by me mjbdhnder. m ieu of a con- veyNice or dedication of land, me casn con- inbutlon to be contnbuied shall be touwtitnt to me fair msfUet value of the e^avaient.un-: • deveioeed land mat would ofhaneiae have been conveyed or dedicaiedr The Oly mM ic* count for sucTi funda m a special fund named Pvk Oedieaiidn «unda. 6. Feir Merbot Vaiuo of Landa. **Faif Mar ket Value ' for purpoaea of mta Code snail be the l»)d me devoiooment vaaie to be deter mined by the Oty Council ee of the time pi pr^kiwiary plat aopkcabei. «n accoroanoa «nin ma fosowmg: (1) Tha Oty Aaaaeaor shall racommeno to • • A ihm City council as to ma fair mamai value of ma iNid alter ccnsuttation with the subdividef. (2) If egreement Is not rtschad between me Oty Assessor and suodivider. men me fair mar ket value Shan bt determined m eceordance with me foflowmg: ^ (a) Fair market value aa determined by the Cty Council based upon a current appraisal suomicted to me Cty by the iubdiwaf. at hit expanse. Tha appraisal sfiai ba mada by ^ pnieara who are approved members of SNEA or MAI. or eouivaiant real estate soeietlee. fb) If m# Oty disouies such appraisal amounts. It may obtain an appraisal of the property Py a ouaiilied rail aatate appraiser which me Oty Counoi laiecti and which ap praisal may be accepted by me Oty as being an accural# appraisal at fair market vaiue. The cott of me appraisal snail be paid by the sub- dhrider. (c) The aubdividtr may appeal arty final de termination of fair marnei vaiue as providad by Minnesota Statute Section 462.361. (3) The deiermmaiion of fair market value of the undeveiooed land by the Oty Assessor. Oty Council, or oesignate appraisers, shall be* determined aa of me time of prekiTunary sub- division aporoval is granted as long as there is final piat approval withm me time limits aa set tonn in tms cnaoiar. Tha time of praiimmary piac approval is utiiizsd because me nature of tnt subdivision, its proDaoie ooouiation. lot sae and value, and oinar reifvant factors are known. If an extension of me time limits m m»s cnaoter is aooroveo by tne Ciy Council, me fair marnet value snail be oetermmed as of the time of me aoorovai of mat extension. In de termining tne fair market vaiue as of lime of preliminary piai aopiicaiion. or me extension tntreof. me factors to be mciuoed in me anal ysis snaU include any and aU faciora wnicn are genarsity accepted and used by apprp'-ed memoera of SRSA or MAi or equivalent real es tate appraisal soceties. (4) Neiwimsiancing me aoove. m no event snail tne caan conmounon per lot be less min S500.00 per tot or S300.00 per dwelling unit. P. Development of Lend Previoueiy Flat ted. If me land nas already been previously suooivided and a fee nad not been previously Pjkj . tr.e recmrementi of tnis division shirt ap ply at me timt of tne issuance of a ouBding per mit for tne primary structure. G. Future Subdivision. Any land wnich is further suooivided. div»ood or reoiatted or ao- pned for suen suoseouent to May 1. 1990. snail be subiect to tne recuvemenis of or dinance men m elftct cortcemmg dedic^.ion of land for ouoiic purooses. ind credit snail be given for any charges oreviouinr imposed upon mat land if me suoc ^oer can prove mat fees were orev»nu- ’ . .. lo event snail me City 0# li. ^ ' . - " - • vuen may be due vjuction in me ap plication r- ^ •.; • • egurvaleni mar- kat value m u» oe dedicated. . . H. Adminle-rative Frocedurea. The Qty snail estabksn suen adrranisffative procaduresas they may deem nccatsaiy ^ propnaie to implement me prowaions of mis section of me code. Soction 3True orinance mart nave fui force and ef- • | feet upon ita oaaaage and publication. Fused Py me Council of me Oty of Orono. Hennepin County. Minnesota, thm 9m dav of Aom 1990.•I • J«nea R. Grabek. Mayor , •• • . ..... Attest: . V*. Dorothy M. Ha«n. Oty Oerk • ^ (Fubliahed in The Laker and Ptoneer April 30. t 19901 . *. I .. S'. I >• ■t q t""# CITY OP OROKO NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold a 8^0o'"p'!mff to review ®5nL-r ‘'appli"^ »' proposed 4-lot residential sihdivision of a VrcpeW located at 998 Wildhurst Trail. st«t^s"“°7%o11'm'"%VIt«n"“™e:»“ar?"s:“^ for review in the City offices by appointment. City of Orono By: Planning Conmiission i,ne A. Mabusth 'Jean,ne A. Mabusth ' Building & Zoning Administrator TO be published the weeil of June 4, 1990. ^ ^ . w '■zU ^ ^ Is onrtfODO (ElBIMi nail i s 1990 Planning Conunlssion Chairman Kelley Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson 3 Proa: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning t Zoning Administrator date: June 14, 1990 Subject: 11465 I** McCourtney, 1055 West Ferndale Road - Variances - Referral from City Council (revised plan proposed) List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Applicant's Letter of Request & Invitation to Visit the Property Staff Hardcover Sumary Applicant's "Existing Hardcover" Submittal Applicant's Proposed Hardcover Submittal Applicant's Existing 6 Proposed Hardcover Calculation Notice of Council Referral to Planning Commission 4/16/90 Staff Memo 4/3/90 Planning Commission Action Notice 11/22/89 Planning Commission Minutes 11/20/69 Letter from Applicant 11/20/89 Memo i Exhibits of 11/17/89 Pertinent Facts -m 1.Applicant has had the property resurveyed and has provided new site area calculations indicating approximately 1% Increase in the area of the property. This does not significantly revise the hardcover percentages on the property. 2. The applicant has had the house location resurveyed, and has found that the house is actually sightly closer to the road than had been shotirn on previous surveys hence the location of the 75* setbac)c line relative to the house has shifted slightly. Again, these changes have little effect on the overall hardcover on the property, but do slightly shift the proportion in each of the 0-75' and 75-250' zones. 3. Applicant's current proposal is to replace the pre-existing circular deck with a slightly smaller terrace. The circular deck was, per the current survey, 56* from the shoreline. The proposed terrace will be 59' from the shoreline. The portion of this terrace in the 0-75' zone is about 54 square feet less than the old circular deck. Zoning File #1465 June 14, 1990 Page 2 of 3 4. Exhibit B, applicant's "existing hardcover ” plan, merely reflects the plan approved in 1988, with the exception that in 1988 the applicant's previous agent, Mr. Credit, agreed to remove the backup apron and a significant portion of the driveway in order to be able to construct decks and sidewalks. Mr. McCourtney now finds that Cradit bargained away more driveway tnan was perhaps reasonable, and is requesting additional hardcover to create a circle driveway for safety and to accommodate off-street parking. Discussion - Please review Exhibits B, C and D. Exhibit B is a hardcover summary indicating the history of hardcover approvals and requests for this property. Because the applicant has not installed the sidewalks and has removed the circular deck, existing hardcover as of 6/14/90 is actually below the 36.8% approved hardcover, not as shown on Exhibit C. The applicant proposes constructing the improvements shown in his proposed plan. Exhibit D. This plan yields 2.6% hardcover in the 0-75' zone, and 46.5% in the 75-250' zone. Please review applicant's letter of request, Exhibit A. The proposal suggests that overall hardcover will decrease if applicant is allowed to remove the 10'-12' gravel shoulder on the right-of-way and replace it with grass, in exchange for allowing additional circle driveway hardcover within the lot boundaries. In discussing this proposal with Public Works Director John Gerhardson, he indicated that it would not be prudent to remove significant portions of that gravel area, considering that the pavement is only 18' wide. He did state that from a safety standpoint, it would be better to orovid* parking aied witnxn the property than along the road. He noted that if the City does approve a hardcover variance to allow the circle driveway, he would grant the necessary driveway access permit. If the applicant is held to the 1988 hardcover square footaqes, he would be allowed approximately 456 square feet for sidewalks, decks, etc. in addition to what you see on the property today. If he was to construct minimal sidewalks in the street yard, and reduce the size of the backup apron, he might have enough hardcover left over to construct a relatively small terraced deck area in the area where the circular deck was removed. Zoning Pile fl46S June 14, 1990 Page 3 of 3 iry of Issues - Will the Planning Conunission allow replacement of the circular deck partially in the 0-75' zone, with the proposed terrace/deck in the 0-75' zone? It is likely the applicant was unaware that removal of the circular deck would disallow replacement with a different deck, since the circular deck had been included in the previous variance approvals. Will Planning Commission recommend approval of additional hardcover over and above the amounts approved in November 1988? If so, what percentages of hardcover will Planning Commission recommend? Are the safety issues justification for granting the full amount of hardcover requested? Or, will the Planning Commission recommend approval of the circle driveway while strictly limiting other hardcover cn the property? Staff Re<Bndation - In any recommendation Planning Commission makes to the Council, the following issues must be addressed: 1. Replacement of deck/terrace in the 0-75' zone. 2. Additional hardcover associated with proposed circular driveway. 3. In conjunction with neither, either, or both of the above, what hardcover percentage or square footage is appropriate tor this property? 6W. /»-/ GERRYw ENKUS LTD.4/4-7556 Custom Bulkier J53I Maplewood Circle • E.uelaior. MS' 55J3I CJ / T'V O O<0x0 0 "Po . ©oX B/?y ■3aA»-e- Kc. ■. "i-ofi/AJ^ /<^s M/f/io cc/eji. y^/0^>vc<. 4aj^ <2>- 7^ ■ .' C>CJ^r^ -7T /^«srs- , ^^39/ T>^^ /?pAyifjc. ^a4&x,k.^ C2/rV C*^o^JQ*A. ^IT ^oua> /fPpA^Ch yfT^c. /^/^ aPPo/^’T'Ct^/r-y -r3 ^-r3d?<^ss V'tf>Cr -7;y^ *7;%: S/^at. ^/£. i^£>Ut.£> S>^ ^r' AoeeA /L^ /7^ ~yjl a>A CTu^^ /5 , 'pLj£y7^^ <2y?^^ 4^/s/OU U>AA*-----Cjc>/^y£^ y 4^>L>7^ ^GC, . -'779/7/y*^- A=h/C. yoc,^ C?o^^x>0yGyp^yo^ . ^r^C4L<.€xy^ ^y A <Uu-: <Z£.fJ7rl-i€^>^^ 5^<^-7S^L Fine Homes of Quality and Value eat. A’Z GERRYwENKUS LTD.474-7556 Custom BiuUlft 3531 Maplewood Cinle • Excelsior. MN 35331 Juns lU, 1990 City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minn.553^? Ra: Zoning fll® *1^65 Garald T. McCo*jrtn-y 1055 Farndale Bd. W. Orono, Ha. 55391 To: Mayor Grabek, City 0ouncU --sabers and Planning Coaaission Moabers. Relptlve to ay letter of 11/20/39 to thn city,! wo'ild like to list sons pertinent facts concerning the overall hardcover and safety of the off street parking as to the proposed variance anplication. #1. Proposed is a concrete patio in the 0-75’ *one at the sane sine and location of an existinc deck which was removed for construction access. A. Approval had been eiven bv the city for a deck in the 0-75’ sone in 1976. 3. An existing deck as of 193? was shown on the variance application and building permit Issued in 1?“3. C. The intent of lir. ifcCo’irtney was to retain the existing deck at that sine and location. 0. The proposed patio will bo 3’ further from the lake and behind the “nearest corner to the lake line'* of thv adjacent hones. 2. Prooosed is a Hardcover increase necessary to provide adequate driveway and turn-around/ off streeet parking for safety reasons. A. Lot has a disproportionate amount of area in the 0-75' tone due to it's shape resulting in lower hardcover for the 75-259* *one. Area Totals- 0-75' zone » 16350 SF. 75-250' xone » 16665 SF. ToUl lot = 33015 Sr. B. Lot site was approved by the City which is less than half the current standard. This sev'»rely limits Hardcover allowable. C. If Right of V.'ay Hardcover is Incl’ided, the proposed Hardcover is 533 3F. less than the existing Hardcover. D. There is adequate fllteratlon of run-off due to the fact tint hall the Hardcover run-off is toward the street and the large 0-75’tone is almost all grass and vegetation. E. The proposed driveway and turn-around/off-street parking will create ' .Muun safer situation. The current off-street parking would be on the gravel sho’ilder which is dancerous due to high traffic speeds and the narrow 13' paved roadway. The proposed finf Homes of Quality and Value GERRYwENKUS LTD.■i'4-7556 Cus(t»m ButUlcr 3531 Maplciunui Cmlc • £.vfrlsit>». AIX 55331 turn-around/ofr-5tr«et parkin? is almost a direct trade-off of Hardcover areas. The proposed turn-iround also pro ’/ldes the McSourtney's vith a safe entrance to the street from the eara?e. ;<r, McCourtney and I look fcrnrd to r.eetin? vith yon at the site , so that we can answer any of ycur questions or concerns. I hope you will consider the above in yo'ir decision. Fine Homes of Qiuility iiint Vii/iie 6^. 6 o VI a I OQ X HI is %« %« « m O lA r* ^le o rJ r% r\ m m ?S •? *« > o ^ • U « I3^2- S 4i ^CV 6 «:sii«i G S ■ O > n S S ils CD irt CD ^ M I • « CD> fH M O O I ^ « (-4 > p4 ^ O O Iu m a £ « s >, uZStas? i «» s S >» o13 41 5 tJ 3) > 41 O 14 ft V U > l4 SiS Is ■ o o ^ «« • in r! G m K 3 «M — ■ 5 ^ rl • tn g m %4 ^ « In O' «a *• %« G 5 jj ry %« ^ •*? 52 CO m • • m JI «n lO f4 4Tm — O IDPI 4T ?« o> « %« ^• ^ • a m a a ^ %4 —* • a m aPI PI a ^ S p!Pi PI • m R* O PI jr a " ^ ^ am p4 a • g s s* a I r I see the current issues as follows; A) Our request to increase hardcover to replace pre existing patio and sidewalk arcTS. B) our request to increase hardcover to add a semi- indrive to add parking area, create a turn- lltriU lll p?ope?tJ!^"" """ follLs;® issues that could impair constructive discussion as A) B) Too many requests from applicant criticism that the appliant intentionally created a situation necessitating unauthorized changes to the swale area. ^ Tos Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson ProBs Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: April 3, 1990 Subject: #1465 Gerald T. McCourtney, 1055 West Ferndale Road - Variance - Referral Back to Planning Commission Zoning District - LR-IA, Single family lakeshore residential, 2 acre Application - Request for hardcover and fence height variances Discussion - This property had been granted variances for hardcover in 1987 and 1988 to allow 36.8% hardcover in the 75-250' zone, and 3.5% in the 0-75 ’ zone. Applicant's current request for additional hardcover increases to as much as 46.0% and 4.5% respectively, received a 3-1 recommendation for denial at the Planning Commission in November 1989. Anticipating similar Council denial, the applicant is proposing a revised plan with less extensive proposed increases. This current plan has not been reviewed by the Planning Commissicn. Staff Recoanendation - Staff recommends that the revised plan be referred to Planning Commission's April 16th meeting for review, with a recommendation to be brought back to the Council at the April 23rd meeting. Proposed Motion: Moved by___, seconded by » to refer revised application #1465, Gerald T. McCourtney, 1055 West Ferndale Road, to the Planning Commij^sion for further review at their April 16, 1990 meeting. Ayes nays O. ZONING PILE NO. 1465 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 4'3-7357 Date of io*’”Gerald’TT”M^ourtney COPIES TOs Gerry Wenkus LTD. 14335 43rd Ave N 3531 Maplewo^ Plymouth, MN 55445 __________________ TYPE OF APPLICATION* Variance DAw'oF*ifflBTINC»' * 11/20/89 VOTE; Noted Below Planning CcMission reconends the following: laeoe #1 - Hardcover: on a vote of 3-1, Planning Commission recommended denial of variances to allow hardcover in excess the previously approved 3.5% in the 0-75' zone and 36.8% in the 75-250 zone. Zaane «2 - Pence Height: on a vote of 3-1, Planning Conraiision recoraended approval of the fence height variance as proposed, with fence to be located within applicant's property boundaries, continuing along the length of the street lot line except for the area of the driveway entrance.• Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as; City Council Monday, Deceaber 11, 1989? meeting ftarts at 7*00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. NllTOTBS OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBEB 16, 1989 ZONING FILE •1464-NADLER CONTINUED Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron informed the Planning Conmission that this application involved a request for an addition requiring hardcover and average setback variances. The applicants have revised their initial proposal in such a way that hardcover will only increase .2% to 29.3% in the 75-250' zone. Gaffron said that the applicants have agreed to remove a portion of the driveway apron and existing plastic under rockbeds, etc. Planning Commissioner Hanson questioned the comments made regarding the "pie-shaped nature of the lot in this case has no significant impact on the allowable hardcover...". Gaffron explained that the applicants had commented that because their lot was pie-shaped that they have less area in the 75-250* zone. Gaffron said that he had looked into that theory further and determined that was not the case. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by Planning Commissioner Hanson, to recommend approval of the average lakeshore setback variance, based on the finding that there are no significant encroachments on the existing lakeviews enjoyed by the neighbors, and further recommending approval of the hardcover variance to allow an increase of .2%, based on the removal of hardcover on the lakeside of the house. Cohen noted that this recommendation for approval was consistent with previous Planning Commission action under similar circumstances. Motion, Ayes-7, Nays-0, Motion passed. 11465 GERALD MCCOURTNEY 1055 PBRNDALB ROAD WEST VARIANCES PUBLIC BEARING It was moved by Chaiman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Cohen, to ’..able this application. Motion, Ayes-7, Nays-0, Motion passed. •1466 DAN KOKESB 4040 HATBRTOWN ROAD VARIANCE PUBLIC BERING 8:20 P.M. TO 8:21 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. Rokesh was present for this application. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that the applicant had recently added on to his residence and as a result had removed the existing porch. Mr. Kokesh would like to replace the porch in the same location, but extend it 2* beyond the front of the house and add on a deck. Proa: Datex Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator October 11, 1989 Subject: 11465 Gerald T. McCourtney, 1055 West Ferndale Road - Variance - Public Hearing Coning District - LR-IA, Single family lakeshore residential, sewered Application - Request for variance to increase hardcover in 75- 250' zone. Fence height variance. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit H - Exhibit I Pertinent Facts Application Plat Map Property Owners List "Existing" Site Plan Submitted ■Proposed" Site Plan Submitted Proposed Fence Elevation View Submitted House Elevations Submitted with Previous Variance Request Surveys/Chronology of Hardcover Development of Property: a) Variances approved in 1975 b) Existing as of 7/21/87 c) Additions approved 1987 d) Additions approved 1988 dl) Applicant's submittal e) 1989 proposal f) Hardcover summary - Documentation from Prior Variance Requests Applicant is proposing to create a circle driveway with two entrance points to West Ferndale Road, and also some additional sidewalks. Hardcover in the 75-250* zone already exceeds the 25% limitation. Additionally, applicant is requesting a street/yard fence height variance to allow a fence with pillar height of 5.5*. This property has been the subject of numerous variance applications through the years. A brief chronology follows: August 1972 - Property owner Maurice McCaffrey granted conditional approval to split 1065 West Ferndale Road into two lots. Although the property was zoned for 1% acres. Council granted conceptual approval to create this new 0.75 acre lot. Zoning File #1465 October 11, 1989 Page 2 of 4 August 1973 - Property buyer Odd Rovic . granted variances to allow a street setback of 15' from the 30' standard then in effect, conditioned on McCaffrey's final plat being filed, on an acceptable septic design and on the condition that the standard (at that time) 50' lake setback be maintained. The plat was ultimately filed as an RLS in July 1974. January 1975 - New 2 acre zoning came into effect. Lot had not been built on as of this date. November 1975 - Application for building permit by Gerry's Construction who was informed that variance had expired. Application for variance renewal filed same day. t'ecember 8, 1975 - Council approval of variances for xot width; lot area; 15' side setback variance; 33' street setback variance (17* setback proposed); and a "23%" hardcover variance. Note that hardcover was also a new factor as of the 1/1/75 zoning code changes. Exhibit H-a is a copy of the original approved site plan, with hardcover calculated by today's methods. Approved in the 0-75' zone was a portion of a deck comprising 1.44% hardcover. In the 75-250' zone, 31.8% hardcover was approved. No sidewalks were sliown. July 1987 - A survey of the property as it existed on 7/21/87 Indicated hardcover (as calculated by current methods) of 3.4% in the 0-75' zone, and 33.2% in the 75-250' zone. The apparent increase in the 75-250' zone was due to a driveway area slightly larger than that originally anticipated. The increase in the 0-75* zone was due to a circular wood deck which was constructed rather than the rectangular deck originally proposed. A greater portion of the existing deck was in the 0-75' zone (Exhibit H-b). September/October 1987 - Council approved additional hardcover in the 0-75' and '5-250' zones. 0-75' increased to 3.5% with a southerly expansion of the house wall near the deck area. The 75-250' zone increased to 36.8% with that same southerly expansion as well as a new bathroom addition at the northwest corner of the house. Also, sidewalks not previously shown as hardcover were now included in the calculations (Exhibit H-c). Zoning File fl46F October 11, 198f Page 3 of 4 November 1988 - In discussions during the renewal of the p?evicu8 1987 variance, applicant requested additional nardcover for a 160 s.f. deck in the 75-250* rone with concurrent reduction of sidewalk and driveway in that zone, which was approved conditioned on there being no net Increase in hardcover. However, note that the "reduction of driveway from 600 s.f. to 420 s.f." proposed per the letter from James Credit 11/16/88 would have effectively eliminated all but a 16* wide section of driveway to serve a three stall garage. The applicant may have assumed that gravel aggregate for parking would not be considered hardcover. This was not a correct assumption then or now. 3, The current proposal requests 43.3% hardcover in the 75-250* zone, an inoroaoc of C.5%. Also, the applicant has removed the circular deck and requires a variance to replace it. The circular deck would be slightly decreased to yield a reduction to 2.9% in the 0-75* zone (Exhibit H-e). A summary of the hardcover history of this property is attached as Exhibit H-f. Discussion - As of this writing, the applicant hao not provided a statement of hardship for the additional variance request. The applicant's agent, Jerry Wenkus, has noted the safety and parking aspects associated with providing additional driveway hard surface, and staff would note that reduction of driveway to the 420 s.f. level to meet the requirements of the 1988 approvals probably does not leave a functional driveway situation. The applicant has contacted the Public Works Director regarding approval for a second access to the property. Whether or not that access is approved by the Public Works Department should not be a factor in consideration of the merits of this hardcover variance request. However, note that the original variances in 1975 were granted partially based on the low traffic volumes of West Ferndale Road (see -7 uncil minutes of August 27, 1973). Also realize that the road shoulder in front of the house is posted "No Parking" not for traffic safety purposes but to eliminate fishermen parking. The "No Parking" signs could be removed if the property owner requests. Leaving the driveway and back-up apron as they existed in 1987 would allow approximately the same amount of off-street vehicle parking as the current proposal, hence the circular drive does not result in significant additional off-street parking area. Zoning File #1465 October 10/ 1989 Page 4 of 4 Regarding the fence height variance request/ please review the proposed site plan for pillar locations and the fence detail. The fence would appear to be relatively open in character. In this location/ since West Ferndale Road is not considered a major thoroughfare nor is it a MSA funded road/ maximum allowable fence height without a variance would be 3.5'. Staff Reco—endation - Given the history of hardcover increases on this property, the current request would seem to be a significant increase with little in the way of hardship offered by the applicant in support of the request. Also, given the history of revisions just during the current remodeling over the last two years, a lack of good initial site planning seems apparent. Planning Commission should address the following specific issues in any recommendation for approval or denial of the variances requested: 1. Should the circular deck be allowed to be reconstructed, leaving a total of 2.9% hardcover in the 0-75* zone? 2. Should a fence height variance be granted to allow the « fence as proposed? 3. What degree of hardcover variance is appropriate for the driveway area? Should the circular driveway be allowed? If not/ would Planning Commission prefer the driveway layout as previously existed to be retained, including the back-up apron? 4. If the pre-existing driveway layout is retained, hardcover percentage will increase above the 36.8% approved in 1988. Per Exhibit H-e, hardcover excluding sidewalks could be as follows: House, deck (items A thru M) Less portion in 0-75' zone Pre-existing driveway (per Exh. H-b) 75-250' Net 5/461 s.f. 407 s.f. 1/004 s.f. 5/978 s.f. - 37.7% 5. How much additional hardcover would be allowed for sidewalks (410 s.f. or 2.6% is shown on Exhibit H-c}? CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION #146Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per eac.h additional variance) “ Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ^Sf ICE Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Please check one - Property abstract or _ _ torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT H153320.CQ0! kOl J02r. 09/22A milPT-THdiKar3ss30. cool Naune Phone (home) 4 Phone (work ) (II?7^*^^ Addressr r’>'> City; 2ip;^S ! OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Q 1^-9 Address:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ City: Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT OSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property _/A Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF RBQC7BST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: VARIANCES REQUIRED _ _ _ Lot Area Setback Variances (, Other Lot Width ^ Hardcover Front _ _ _ Side Rear) VROSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OBSCRIPTIOII OP ONUSUAL PROPERTY COHDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form i. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). ^ ^ 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date^- - - - - - - - - - - APPLICAET'S SIGHATURB , , . The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in re;i^ew of thiS'-application, and certifies that the information supplied is^-true ^d-^correct .to the best of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's Signature ^Date 9/w if ONNERS SIGNATURE ^ ^ t ..u « The owner hereby ac)cowledge8 and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Coounission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification ojj/this request.tion Owner's Siuimture ^----—l_______________________ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ ___ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commissicn Meeting. Planning Coi—iisr on held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all schedu.ed review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building * on ng Office of this change prior to the meeting. MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 1989 ZONING PILE 11289-WILL CONTINUED ramifications tc Mr. Wear's subdivision homeowners as a result of turning the road into a public road? Mabusth said that the homeowner's association would still maintain Wear Circle. Mabusth asked for specific reasons as to why the Planning Commission wanted the public road publicly maintained. Kelley replied that the Planning Commission had a difficulty with the concept of a public road that is privately maintained. Kelley asked how the City could mandate the homeowner's association to maintain the public road. Mabusth said that the City Attorney's opinion is that the City could make such a requirement. Hanson said that such a proposal is poor planning. Bellows said that such an arrangement was virtually unenforceable. Motion, Ayes»4, Nays*0, Motion passed. 11465 GERALD HCCOURTNET loss PERNDALB ROAD WEST VARIANCES CONTINUATION OP PUBLIC HEARING 8:10 P.M. TO 8:- P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. McCourtney was present for this matter, as was Mr. Gerry Wenkus, Mr. McCourtney's contractor. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained Mr. McCourtney's proposal and the history of the property. Mr. McCourtney said that the basis of this project was the need to add a closet. He said that their intentions had gotten out of hand, but they had not set out with the idea that they would get approval for hardcover increases every other month. He said that the proposal being presented was the best plan to service the property the way that it is set up. He said that the purpose of the driveway proposal is just to get the cars off of the road. Mr. Wenkus said that he had come into this matter after the initial building permit had been issued. He said that he had tried to work with the City in preparing the landscape plan and trying to resolve this matter in a way beneficial to both Mr. McCourtney end the City. He said that the hardship is uhe size and shape of the property and the fact that over half of the property is located in the 0-75' zone. He said he has cut back on the width of the sidewalk areas and the size of the patio areas from what they had initially proposed. He said that what is being proposed is appropriate for the neighborhood. Mr. Wenkus noted that there had been a 6' fence existing in the right-of-way which had recently been removed. The fence being proposed is less obtrusive and would be located within the boundary lines of the property. Mr. Wenkus said that the replacement terrace will encroach no closer to the lake than the pre-existing deck. He also said that he had taken into consideration the sight lines of the two neighboring properties a MIHUTES OP '»*HE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 20 r 1989 ZONING PILE #1465-MCCOORTNEY CONTINUED and only tne tip of the terrace touches the sight line. He said that the terrace will only be 1.5' above grade with no railings. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. Planning Commissioner Brown said that the Planning Commission has been very consistent in limiting additional hardcover beyond the Zoning Code Requirements. Brown said on the other hand he could understand the safety concerns of the applicant. He said that he would be inclined to say that hardcover should remain at its current percent. He said that the driveway could be constructed, but perhaps not the deck. Kelley observed that the deck would be located in the 0-75' zone. Gaffron said that allowing the driveway and sidewalks to go in would bring the hardcover total to 46% in the 75-250' zone. Planning Commissioner Hanson said that the remodelling and consequent hardcover were appropriate, but he wished to uphold the City's consistent policy regarding hardcover in the lakeshore. He said that eliminating the terrace would be a method of maintaining hardcover. Planning Commissioner Bellows said that she is not convinced that -he driveway configuration will solve the safety problem. She said that it would be difficult to back out of the garage and get turned around to drive out of the circular drive. Bellows said that she was bothered by the significance of the house in relation to the size of the lot. She said that she was shocked to see that ^t had developed to the degree that it had. She agreed that there was a legitimate safety concern, but that it was self-inflicted. She did not think that allowing the large circular driveway would solve the problem. Bellows thought that there were other solutions and suggested that Mr. McCourtney be prepared for either "some hard trade-offs or for some sheer denials". Mr. Wenkus said that with respect to the hardcover, the adjacent land is sparsely developed and there is quite a bit of additional square footage in the area for runoff and filtration. Mr. Wenkus also noted that the house had not varied much from the building specs to the finished product. He said that the of the house was brought forward slightly and that the roof peak in the center of the house was 4* higher than the original house. Mr. Wenkus said that the lot is substandard by virtue of City of Orono actions in the 1970's. He said that it was developed as a substandard lot witn less acreage because the City of Orono allowed a .75 acre let to be developed in a fairly expensive neighborhood with high property values. Hr. Wenkus said that they have built only to those values and not tried to overbuild. NXMCTBS OF THE PLAlOilliG COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 1989 ZONING PILE #1465-MCCOORTHBY CONTINUED Planning Commissioner Bellows said that the house was nicely done, but the issue is hardcover. She said that the Planning Commission had been through this with Mr. McCourtney before. She said that it would be difficult to approve a 101 increase in hardcover, especially due to the fact that the lot is small. Chairman Kelley said that he would be inclined to recommend that hardcover remain at 3.51 and 36.8% as required as PJ»^t of the approval for Mr. McCourtney's 1988 application. Kelley questioned whether it would be possible for the applicant to obtain adjacent property? Mr. Wenkus replied that acquiring adjacent land was a possibility but he could not answer that question at this time. Mr. Wenkus reiterated that there was a definxte hardship and that the square footages were appropriate. He said that ir tne Planning Commission recommends maintaining hardcover - .ne current percentage, he could not even put in a reasonable driveway, not to mention the patios and sidewalks. He said c.iat the maximum allowed width of the driveway would be 16 , not adequate to serve a triple width garage. Planning Commissioner Bellows asked Gaffron how this plan differed from what was approved sc that only that much driveway would be permitted. Gaffron replied that the addition of sidewalks was a factor as is the fact that the terrace is a bit larger than the pre existing deck. Gaffron said that the applicant in the previous application had "traded away" hardcover that he should not rea nably have traded away". There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Bellows, seconded by Planning Commissioner Hanson, to deny the hardcover variance and that the current hardcover percentages 3.5% and 3®*®' remain. Motion, Ayes-3, Brown, Nay due to his concern for safety with the cars being parked along Ferndale. Motion passed. The portion of this application pertaining to the fence was then discussed. Gaffron asked the applicant if he would «till require the fence, in light of the denial for the circular driveway? Mr. Wenkus said that they would still like the fence as proposed as it is more aesthetic than anything else. Bellows asked where the fence would be located now chat there is no circular driveway? Mr. Wenkus replied that it would be approximately In the MINOTBS OP THE PLAHNIHG COMMISSIOH MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 1989 -O^ia ^av, a configuration rather than curved. Chairman Kellay asked whether the applicant had explored the poasibility of a 3.5* high fence? Mr. Wenkus indicated that it would be more appropriate to construct the iron fence at the height proposed. Chairman Kelley asked whether it was the applicant's intention to plant arborvitae along the fence? ;:n v.tev.v.S'-.f'/.r.': Hr. Henkus said that the fence would also limit trespassing. There were no comments from the public regarding this natter and the public hearing was closed. Planning Commissioner Hanson indicated that he did not object to the height of tho fence. She felt that this proposal was appropriate however cue openess of the fence. It was moved by Planning Commission ”=°"J®thls -ripVVop%{n£^ the *'7"j'/thVturn-^^^ "'o-" amended hir RVl‘i:yrNV; d‘ue‘t"o^i‘. ^r2l«:nc. to f.e a I.9- fence. Motion passed. •1481 GBBALD MCCOORTMBY OH. PERMIT/VRRIR-C '““‘5hfJS??.;it'’of’?u>>”c!uL'’;nd certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. Mccourtney was present for this matter, as was Mr. Henkusp Mr. McCourtney’s contractor. Gerry Assistant Planning and * 3”J"jt\“*of’a basVment• explained how staff had discovered the construction oi MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 1989 ZONING PILE #1465-MCCODRTNEY CONTINUED and only the tip of the terrace touches the sight line. He said that the terrace will only be 1.5' above grade with no railings. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. Planning Commissioner Brown said that the Planning Commission has been very consistent in limiting additional hardcover beyond the Zoning Code Requirements. Brown said on the other hand he could understand the safety concerns of the applicant. He said that he would be inclined to say that hardcover should remain at its current percent. He said that the driveway could be constructed, bur perhaps not the deck. Kelley observed that the deck would be located in the 0-75' zone. Gaffron said that allowing the driveway and sidewalks to go in would bring the hardcover total to 46% in the 75-250' zone. Planning Commissioner Hanson said that the remodelling and consequent hardcover were appropriate, but he wished to uphold the City's consistent polic^ regarding hardcover in the lakeshore. He said that eliminating the terrace would be a method of maintainino hardcover. Planning Commissioner Bellows said that she is not convinced that the drivcway configuration v;ill solve the safety problem. She said that it would be difficult to back out of the garage and get turned around to drive out of the circular drive. Bellows said that she was bothered by the significance of the house in relation to the size of the lot. She said that she was shocked to see that xt had developed to the degree that it had. She agreed that there was a legitimate safecy concern, but that it was self-inflicted. She did not think that allowing the large circular driveway would solve the problem. Bellows thought that there were other solutions and suggested that Mr. McCourtney be prepared for either "some hard trade-offs or for some sheer denials”. Mr. Wenkus said that with respect to the hardcover, the adjacent land is sparsely developed and there is quite a bit of additional square footage in the area for runoff and filtration. Mr. Wenkus also noted that the house had not varied much from the building specs to the finished product. He said that the front of the house was brought forward slightly and that the roof peak in the center of the house was 4' higher than the original house. Mr. Wenkus said that the lot is substandard by virtue of City of Orono actions in the 1970's. He said that it was developed as a substandard lot with less acreage because the City of Orono allowed a .75 acre lot to be tJeveloped in a fairly expensive neighborhood with high property values. Mr. Wenkus said that they have built only to those values and not tried to overbuild. MlltlTES OF TBB PLJOmiNG COHMISSION MEETING HOVEMSEB 20, 1981 ZONING PILE #l465->MCCOORTNBy CONTINUED Commission had been throuqh this with Planning «id that it would beTf«“i!t"to a”;profeT J^oraaa "!■* hardcover, especially due to the fact thft the loi is small. that “aVd«*ve?iemLn“at a®„d"°^^^^ inclined to recommend questioned whether it would be possible ^obtain adjacent property? applicant to possibllitrbut" he%^“rl nlt“nsw%\“Vha"t’au«?f®"‘ ^ ?h- ?,"u\“r%-f“ gPt"%fr “cTi?a1e°r “e^ruTd ‘’^o"t"^"^l^"^p"uri^/rfja%ol\b ‘L' th^SmuT^Uored'wTdth^^fth? d^lv^iarw^u'd be M- adequate to serve a triple width garage. dlffer%^d*"f"/om® wrt”i”‘rprrolVd^?o “%°hlt^'^n"lt“tL°t" as is°t"eTa/t'’tha1 t“ft«1 act" V°a" b/t aTplVc7t i"o*„^ad'^4l?d^;nU^^^reasonably have traded away". ^ dcover that he should not and tJe*publ!rh«rrnrras%'i;s:d ‘'* "«‘« :ia7"r7.1HSfhSiSr"'' remain. ' Motion. Ayes-^f BVow7''»^y“2^to^^,^* ^‘V** With the cars bein^ paried75'S;g''?e^^d7l^? '’iio%fS„"=;a7sldr then ™iscu7sei!" application pertaining to the fence was i.nce?%77ighV;.f%'h7dtSLS^ Yo7 tVe 7irc°u“li^ 5^iVel/y7“^'* proposed a"s'?t“ls7^r77eVth‘ei!^ tls7. “ there\%“nrUrc^far drrvewly? Mr. Wenkus replied that it would be approximately in th- MI.4UTBS OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 1989 ZONING PILE #1465-MCCOORTNBY CONTINUED same location as proposed but it would have a straight configuration rather than curved. Chairman Kelley asked whether the applicant had explored the possibility of a 3.5' high fence? Mr. Wenkus indicated that it would be more appropriate to construct the iron fence at the height proposed. Chairman Kelley asked whether it was the applicant's intention to plant arborvitae along the fence? Mr. Wenkus said that they would be planting shrubbery and trees in the entire front yard and on either side of the fence. Mr. Wenkus said that the fence would also limit trespassing. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. Planning Commissioner Hanson indicated that he did not object to the height of the fence# openess of the fence.rnmmmms.motion, Hanson seconded. Kelley said that it note that there was a pre-existing C fence on this Motion, Ayes-3, Kelley, Nay due to his preference to see a 3.5 fence. Motion passed. #1481 GERALD MCCOURTNBY 1055 PBRMDALB ROAD WEST AFTER-THE-FACT CONDITIONAL USE PBRMIT/VARIAHCB rOBLIC HEARING 8t40 P.M. TO 8*55 P.M. r w The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing we duly noted. Mr. McCourtney was present for this matter, as was Mr. Gerry Wenkus, Mr. McCourtney's contractor. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaf^ron ^ explained how staff had di'^covered the construction of 11 I 3 Tot Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Date: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator November 17# 1969 Subject: #1465 Gerald T. McCourtney# 1055 West Ferndale Road ~ Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IA# Single family lakeshore residential# sewered Application - Request for variance to increase hardcover in 75-* 250' zone. Also# a fence height variance is requested. HOTS: This memo is an addendum to the attached memo and exhibits of October 11# 1989. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Most Recent Version of Site Plan Exhibit B - Elevation Views Indicating Terraces Exhibit C - Staff Hardcover Review of Most Recent Site Plan Exhibit D - Memo & Exhibits of 10/11/89 This item was tabled at your October meeting in order for applicant to submit a conditional use permit application for gradijcg work in the 0-75' zone. That is application #1481. Appl;ioant has submitted a combined site plan/hardcover plans/grading plan which is attached to this memo as Exhibit A. I have reviewed the hardcover history of this property in Exhibit H-F of the 10/11/89 memo. Staff hardcover review of the most recent plan is attached as Exhibit C of this memo. A summary of previous# current and proposed hardcover is as follows: 0-75' 75-250' Per 1975 Approval 1.44% 31.8% Per 1987 As-Built Survey 3.4% 33.2% Per Per Approved Approved Proposed Most per per Site Recent Res.#2279 Res.#2546 Plan Plan 10/12/87 11/28/88 9/89 10/27/89 3.5% 36.8% 3.5% 36.8% 2.9% 43.3% 4.5% 46.0% (AreaO-75' - 16#800 s.f.; Area 75-250* - 15#870 s.f.) Applicant is additionally requesting a fence height variance. Please carefully review the memo of October 11# 1989 and the new exhibits. i -5 O:•ns ' 4 > /^ERRY \J^^f^ENKU5 LTD. - /'■ 474-7556 ’*TC , Ciisiom/Jtiil(/i*r ”ov<»mb9r ?0, 193^ J.5.3/ hhtplvwviHl ('inlt' • n.\(«‘lsi(»r. M\ )i {51 Jean Mabusth City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn.55333 RS: Zoning File #1465 jsrald T. McCourtnsy 1055 Ferndale Road West Wayzata, Mn. 55391 Dear Jean, I would like to request a Trariance to Increase hardcover in the 75-250* zone. Due to the site and shape of the property at 1055 Ferndale Rd, West the present toning orllnance severely limit the allowable hardcover. In order to provide adequate driveway, sidewalks and patios, I am requesting additional haixlcover up to 7»?45 s.f. in total for this property. The driveway plan as shown will provide for safer o^f-street parking and turn around. The existing deck which has been removed for construction access vras considered by myself and Mr. Cradit to be replaceable without variance. We find however, that a variance Is required and wotild like to also request a variance for the new deck/terrace as shown on plan E-1. Finv Honu s of Qualiiy mul Milne r #1472 «<Wil : •" l- • •« ,1 1 .1 I fi* > vH \ ’t « . ■ v<.- X; A*. 38 10-11 7-23 31 COOl GECPCE F ftJiVECNO 2010 S7CRELINF ORI VE WAV2-; : HM 55>3 9l 38 10-117-2 3 il 0C02 JCHN 7 SPENCP 20AO AO SHCRF OR kAYZATA MN SS391 38 iO-ll7-73 31 CCS? 0»fa'U CBEAR I960 STATES AVE WAYZAT* MN 553SI 38 10-I17-23 31 0C90 RICHARD V STINSON 20A0 S>»A':ES AVE kAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 42 COOS 38 10-117-23 42 0007 A G ASCHENBECK JR ALAN NETTLES L. ANNE NETTLES 1930 SHORELINE DRIVE 1940 SHORELINE OR •TT'.rrX WAYZATA HN 55391 QRONO1 MN 55391 38 10* 117-23 42 0015 H TOURANGEAU 2060 SPATES AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 lC-117-23 42 0022 CRAIG OLSON 1960 SHORELINE OR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 00C8 PARI ETTA H ANDERSON 2055 SPATES AVE WAYZATA MN 55291 28 10-117-23 31 0095 TERRY 0 MORSE 2C60 SPATES AVE CPONO MN 55391 28 10-117-23 42 0012 E ROeiE WAYNE 5CC9 EACELSIOR BLVO APT 126 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 28 10-117-23 42 LYLE VICKERPAN INTERLACHEN LA EXCELS ICR PA 5i331 0017 • • • • . • 36 10-117-23 42 0016 RONALC J PR1NEAS .1980 HERITAGE OR WAYZATA MN 55391 ( K TOTAL t 3 00017 ( 38 ''vlp-117-2^1 STATr>A>UL«a<yT 00»4 38 10-11'- Z3 31 U09« HARRIET SPATES TORANCEAU 2C60 SPATES AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 42 0014 SAILORS mORLO BCX 176 CRYSTAL SAY MN 55323 30 10-117-23 42 0021 CAN 1EL CREAR 1980 SPATES AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 '1 •‘**•••^'1*- •I . * • • • S *•«<•■»•» •; -1, f it «>-■ ;wmfefei V. •► VL“ VL - 't .iif Vw''i 3|V,!f' IH '»i,V • • ' : • fwm • • ■ • •.. • V - ». '. * ; » •. > • . • •• •• . «• »V ^ i * m ...... ... . • . ... 'et!^ Afm ^3i*y 5t=- ^•7^‘ ^fgh ib»*550 SF "fT'7£b* za^ \b,(ab^^ • • • •• • « • «•«« £?,5rSic-;r' • •!#« • ^. ■“ .. *. *.-?. ** . . - •nawc. tirypgeyjep. • V-- 'V -?r • * « * ^ * *, *• '. • ' .•*■• * •. <i.‘ < . |( ... • -:. ’-sr?;.**/--:." •:. r . . • :> .::«.' ■ r lUir fiMUSCMeK. :;zgT-m SP :r -*7.- • -.» ■ .‘ if*"^’i •* Be^\wi%MF , ________ .fen\«MN30S .PB^\NiSW^r. -. •^'^v'dilBuiyfKrfr W^ccguBtt '• . ^ « ". . i —*.. -* «; WTWWVWUS.. SRwJSU . sy«ni^___ • ••, • - . r* • • .* • •• • .—. . ?■. ~ ..... *•% *' .• ■ 31 4>- /K>7Tfl<Lie^ YbT lyP^LPL • » Z,e»T^6P «• «• •. .1. "iw- HffDODVgp.._________ ti). * ... - . ___ . ___ n nA^ &.£.gffWWSBS HimogflVfflK. ..-aw.SITg. , •• A* L. ... -■*♦•* *u^ <r*r^. ‘ r '*- /•’• .: /A .15W^^ce jl T5W^*c^__________ ___________ .WL.SE. J5^WL-_ ______ K& __-.Dl«VB»!^X_..— __-efetiPiT:____ sit <:^a»NA#JV •"N ;?. .' *-*^9 »v.- ' 7^’ ,i Bygp Hf«Paugie -lu tovtf J?eiw?»^C________: "-. .eessfc.fie& ssc. <>ft 4 ..*• • . a. .. .... ►« APPLICATION NO. 1465 CITY OP ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice; 4/16/90 TOl Gerald T. McCourtney COPIES: Gerry Wenkus, Ltd. 14335 43rd Ave N 3531 Maplewood Circle Plymouth, MN 55445 Excelsior, MN 55331 TYPiJ OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETINGt 4/9/90 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION: Referral of revised proposal to Planning Commission. Revised plans must be submitted by May 7» 1990 in order to be considered by the Planning Commission at their May 21, 1990 meeting. Please contact Mike Gaffron at 473-7357 if you have any questions. If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Recorder or City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. • • . * ’. j .if • ^ ; •, ; «>. ’ ‘I ■* •».. • ? )■ . ? • •. #> I. ■ ^ •• • ‘ - mmm-^ • - . - ?* \ I l^fiG>a3\jv^rt&}ieyj^ //-/t-s-f !l I Ccvb :ii= !^B>1 0~y^' e/t-^'G/Z^-rir^c, Pottr/c/iS OF /^&uS£j i _/M^oie___ficv»x/oO TO i>t C|:l ____ ,/ .___ M •n--- * I r- > ;f- „. /H.^F/8,0_ _. . ^ ' / /.r * 20/2______ *=.35 )7r _ C * t/z___c? t> ' /o 3 /z... tf ^;r,^x ///2—- <5 --?r'p » ....^3 .P/tft^pset> i 7S--7 j: . i •. ’ * ’• ♦ * •"4.•..! r ' -.1 ■■‘ V ■••'*. ‘J'-i ,'J- /. '•’;’V yt -^y •: ' * ’*■* y • '• *■' '■ « 7S’r2ro pAc(*o92^ ____ .i;^. (^pee/vJCV^V^At0^a(/t'r4t.L r ';e-t?v/:n77A3ci) t /oi'^^ie>’i*■ 3rj^->- Ho^t- /os^ -/a-39VtS'S. -=.:C-. V ----------—^ 4 t d>--7S'--------- -V/V «A ' jr->^"'7^i2.ACeS : " --ir— suj "/z. — [t-(focno*o^ ^ -3>‘V/2-' * ^ — IL>~' ~ “Z-/ (^ I __ - 2^r yX. ■ * • M • -"" * * “ —■ cO C'jAi'y =;5 2-iA.I- »•ir + ”/67/ S.Xr . * (2.0J,X, X -<^0 i:^* / <TAiCm, 2^ --4 :-----llrr^TMTS'ft-4- i//*7+2*^5^733. -i-li-ll ■^to-^2‘7 =”7^0^^ _-'i^>0 ^/'T/-5'/8T0 7S'-2CO' r.\ /•; * .• . • I - • ^ u H u •* yy *' • •Mvfe' ■••■■aVMV • vi- • |i •l Ki L : . • 4 • • • ••.• :S£ •il’i.;- M:'•Vh.'. 4 t 4 t t _J Citv of OROINO RESOLUTIOM OF THE CITV COUNCIL • ■•••■>NO A nrr.oLUTioN grantikc : VARIAHCnS TO MUTJICirAL ZONING COOu r.ECTION 10.22, SUDDIVISION 1 AND SnCTlOri 10.23, SUDDIVISION 6 (D) PILE 11104 WHCRBAS, Gornl'.J T. McCc’jrtncy iheroinaftcr "the ^ipplicant", is • V. ' owner of thr proper*:'/ li'catei; "it 1055 v.*cr.t FornJalc Hoad within the city of oror.o (hereinafter "City") ar*i looally described as follows: >'rc r.xhiMt A, attached, (horeinal ter "the property"); and WHERPAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to .-.ur.icipal Crning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 and Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (D) to permit the construction of bathroom, dinette, and I.'und.r** reor ac'ditiens to the oxistin i structure resulting in an incriase of 4. •\- ct 3*51' :*. a -•.vh'*re onl*/ ::: *•*. i.r.c ju): t:ov. 1 •••%<* ' s 'Ct 1: trow# Tlli:nrroi:r:, nn it resolved by the city Council of Orono# riNDiNr.n ’.»i* nprliCsi! ' n w.ir reviewed ns r.cning File <*1104. • • • • . *!!' rr ;*• *ty **• - in the LR-IA Single For.ily Lnkeshorc »»» t • . I •: r • : !:r:nn Conn i:: r. i on reviewed this application on * • **. ::rf] r“'com.Tcncicd approval of the proposed variancesf '! 1 cwi.ea f indi re*".: : * ef *:I:e rtrea of this property is located within the 0 protected area. rr*:^r^ feet ol‘ grassed lahc.shorc yard area : a ’ 1 rCv-:tr enc irca for the hardcover on tho I* • • r.o relative correents f ren the adjacent# no* *■ ^ «fTjO'o**r• r »^ I n f *• j •city of ORONO resolution of the city council NO.227J • * The City council has considered findinss and ”=°””f.^“ions of the PI ^^9 ^ proposed "„“rranc?“n t'he“th? s'eVet^^and welfare of the coceunity. 5. The city Council a*^°no\°"ap’ply"|enerAly*to oPher property are peculiar . ^hat granting the variances orooerty in this zoning discr-ct, t g liqht, air nor pose a fire So? adversely affect traffic conditions pi i^^^^ merely serve talari or othL danger to ne^ to alleviate a as a convenience to the app ^ necessary to demonstrable hardship or ^ pVicant; and would be m keeping :.urrn“ spi?I°"d"^" i"“n\ of the z^o^nin, code and Comprehensive Of the City. CONCLDSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more Municipal Zoning Code Section rity Council hereby grants valances p 6 (B) to the :r-.22, subdivision 1 and " isti^ structure that requires hardcover 1. The drainage swalo "®l^ed^a? a^^lfr^rthe^pJoposed ho porranontly cr temporarily altered as ronstruction. 2. .authorities granted with ly and ” u\*t 'b? Ixe?cised by wi*h th'' aopl leant, out are „ „„„ vear of the date of ?ICicrr'a'p"proval‘’. "“r“t“c"le Unces -ill aspi- »" <=““ (Soptenber 2B, 1988). 3. Violation of oi l*^co^I*sVitute^a^vioration of the conditions of this any authority granted l^r^iZ ?nf ^h.^fl bo puni3hable as a nisdemoanor. 4 -ho undersigned applicant his heirs, to tAe terns of this rcsolu^^^^^ recording of this EUCCoGEcr? c^ncl as^ign^# ^i^lc Of the property. re.solution in the ch.sin of title ut rnc f rage 2 of 4 il fi p \ ' / • •. • K • i • I ' '• • 4\- -.a.5' ;.-| City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ^279__________ rA L> ■o: From : n.Tto: Siibicct : Plnrninq Ccr.TiiPsicn Ch.iirn<.in Kelley Orono Pliinnina Cor^n'i psj on Merbers City A.'lministr.itcr P«'rnhord.<=on Jeanne A. Vabusth, Huildinc s Toning Aidninistrctor Auquj^t H , 1 ‘‘H7 a 1184 Gerald T. VcCotirr n-’v , 10:.5 's 'cp ‘ Variance - PuMir l^ariro Forndalf; Road - o \ng District - T.R-IA ?.= ^!iv,sic.„ : - excessive hardcover wic‘ -n 75 to 2T:0 cotbnek Total Area = s.f. I) 0-7 C* setback ajco - i0,^00 s.t^ Harticovor • 0 s.f. 2 ) 7 5 - 7 0 * r; b V.* *• i* ^ a = 1 ? , 8 7 0 s.f. Alio *C': bci ?■ *7".v*'r = s.f. or 25^ har b ’r'ver = 5»b79 s.f. or 36%*j rroro^'^'i hcirirovor “ ‘"^r958 s.f. or 37.5**2 Total ^ar :rcrease = 279 s.f or 1.5^ ♦. Exist inn !la rd cover ^rinci pa 1 structure = 3 ,: 4 «!. f. ‘ c k 715 s.r. ’ i iL'wa .1 k -410 P.f. i V*'Af)!' r . f . TOTAL =- r r .f. f ••: c'^' 1 ‘ .2 3#7»jbd 1 V i s 1 (.’H ^ or ba^'hreo"^ •‘dr’ i :cr north Porpi J ? ^ 3 -1 Lxistjna - IS t rrcpi'Sod *= IS • ^r. ‘jO^ * rropo.sed flardcover Prjncip.il structure = 4,518 s.f. pock - ^30 s.f. Sidewalk “ 410 s.f. pjejyp — 600s.f. TOTAL = 5,958 s.f. \tr;t r»f Exhibits fv**• hi ►- *pplJ caticr "xbi 1 : *:j:- Ovn^^rs T i st r.y^i h: *»•- Plat •>'•1 bj •■n - • n f ^ S k <** t c h t*v^ » bi ^r !— Pi!* Plan ,ddi-:c-, tc t.tthrcc-. rcc-, dinette , I . -oc-' '=.<•. of r'jc--jre jdded to r?;nc!Dal . ,^j.„,^v ’:~ate 1 V rrere^ed adc ’it:en<! Tn jro area '■•'5u.*^ir'o -a. e-'’.a.i e. .. a . c. • • •• *'r -r -.r. ■nir.*! Fi 1 * 1 n*!rt ! I f • 1 *r\of .: 7*1.' I'.T broom addition ucturo ^wi'l i'°oncroach no ‘urthcr •ido sotbacV. variance o ‘ .^otback area at 15 foot. The width nto tho oxistir.ci substandard .it. > ,DoroximatG 1 y 170 foot, tho current •r the lot at the f, 1 for^^i irinimum of 200 toct of width with ;:?brct^'Vh^e%';^v^er\7w‘aVir;Tod^ — '.•*nndards. The lakoshore additions ^ 1 J a sliqht •bo rap?nd berm’ed shoreline. The setback as always •j'd^rr^mlJed ?rS; the denned rip rapped shoreline. •11 ,ier. r>Tll for a hardcover variance of 279 s.f. or ..5, M IS the fine! tctel oI 17.5. hardcover too excessive tor this prop ‘?rty? B, Uhst erocs of e-ist.ne h..rdcover c.tn be reduced to .inioise in'pnct ? 1 Turnorou-.d ere. within drive is an isiproveoent th.st must remain for saf- .iccess onto Vvest Ferndale. Are therm other areas - dock - sidewalk?? !;ireAatier o ’';;r'50.";r%'hV7rea^^ t"h?i^%%"per?; U 'io"t''cd luMn rnm 0-7? protected area. Total Area = 32,670 s«f; - »• „ ' 16,BOO s.'. o:- 51.4* - A0-75* staff has received no nenativo cu""'"*! ' 'so prerosed irprovements on tho whole ^PP® . Pavim and other .oomrtv. The majority ef ^ ® f, ^ i^gta 1 led and in staff's opinion :,t"/nn,rr Tirrs."o..'(iv:^ area for the itardcc' or on the property. 5 set-back and hardcover ctiff would recommend approval o. * uj/dships and findings •.ria.ic-s .IS proposed hased on one rr more of the har .snip ^ • O I 'n : r - Fi 1*' ^ 1 1B4 - ^** r?# 19^7 *5 4\'iclitionol Ccrrr.cntr. • t?»of MdiUon.,! Co™ont= and rUnninn Coi-lr.nion B.-comnondation - 4 • • t n.ir r.pocinl cnr- b*' the property. ^ \ 99^ 9 \ 9* 9 •• r • 9 v.rinnce of 10 feet and based on the findings noted r.v'UrfV"rbov^'‘'"Thc Plonnxng •onnissior. recernendat ion. •*.. 1 To: i*rom: rate: Vayor Grabok 6 Orono Council Members City Administrator Dernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator October 8» 1987 subject. If ’ (V''in"«'U of 6/19 of a percent over the 37.5* proposed, now requesting 38.1 %). Also, since the bathroom will extend 4* further forward, being about from the street, it will be about 13*3- from the side lot line instead of the 15' previously approved. ’'acts - "5-250* Hardcover "ide Setback (30* Roquired) Resolution #2264 Before Approved 5,679 s.f. (36%) 5,958 s.f. (37.5%) 15* 15’ Now Requested 6,048 s.f. (3^.1%) 13*3" Mst of Exhibits Exhibit A - Proposed Change Exhibit B - Council Minutes of 9/28/87 S : Se'Jl^ctin, p.qu«ted Chan,e, '^taff Recoonendation - Council has 4 options: 1. Deny the request; 2. Approve with revisions; 3. Approve as requested; 4. Refer to Planning Commisson for further review. Applicant or his representative intends to be at the meeting to yplain the need for the re •isio..3. TO: Dick Benson, City Administrator FROM: Hank Muhich, Zoning Administrator DATE: October 8, 1976 SUBJECT: Maurice McCaffrey - Femda^ West - .... - -DriinB(o probl6Bi with naighbor Odd Rovicx - lOSS Faxndala Road Waft 1 think ae have a tiger here, md I'm not tw half of 1100 flllnf fee. • ■ 2 No record in file, but Mr. McCaffrey aust have purchasedpropertr as.« Septeiiber 22, 1972, he obtained a permit to re«»ve the ftur.eidatijif.ttl»to.^^ •. ^ * *. ,* *.'? t. *v V. • •Mrvr 3. 4. S. 6. aman that Mr. McCaffrey suorntteo a leguwv w ^ •; Sbdivlda this pnptrty intoj<o parcels as prevlcarty Plaraiint GBadsslon mbaites of August 8, 1972, shorn ^p»ofiX,CBBtapK,«^«>f.^,.^ atlamiMpUe • -m •' A U» V.< I Miroved concept of 2 let siiadtted aid amoved. SMtmbw 11. 1972 - Letter frm Scheller to MeCsffIray wlthlnstittctlm^-^'^Srss" - Noveidwr 16, 1972 - Utter frm variaice and estlaated cost of < obtained showed cost as $50,000 wltli T.. r-f— •• • ' •. • ••ivrv 1?^;’ i^sibirre^oM - intent ****•“*“* cNaU (ael^r) shewi^con mmmm Mnwti »• .If «!■■■■ ^■Hvo oT KwwoiMiM i»*ng doBO. iStill no erioBCO May 1, 1975 • ^hmo frai McCaflFrey to Sdwller wplainlng possible revisions - intent of nainta<«<«« ^roiaa. ineiei driveway and desire to oonfom to all |%y 14, 1973 - Copy of lottei cam over Mefieil*s distress < of application on file.) sWe yard, aid lakeshore setbacks (receipt for fte on file). of subdivision and engineer's approval of sewaie system. Auaat 27, 1973 - Approved Rovick variances akjact to McCaffrey's final pUt b^ filed end sewage system affiroval. * ^I 4..- V'J •- '-w *.< *• 7/ 1 Maurice McCaffrey * 1065 Fetndale Rood West Page 2 12. August 28, 1973 - Letter froa Marston to McCaffrey inibnliig hia of Cauncil actJoa. Letter instiucts McCaffrey to subait final plat and previous assuraiee that he (McCaffrey) would be willing to bear expense for aaterlal necessary. 13. August 28, 1973 • Letter froa McCaffrey to Gordon Coffin requesting hardshell aad necessi^r aaterial for final plat. (I o^cbi't find mtf final plat nateri^A . ^ s ’ '«• f A.*- I file. This aaterlal is quite expensive for a surveyor to prepar e survey is required. It appears subdivision approval was ^ven on a sketch prepar ed by Coffin. Gai't find survey.) 14. August 27, 1973 -----------,-------------, , . . . nqulTM., (IM » >»lpt f.r 15. Septcaher 4, 1973 - Latter frca McCaffrey'to Mnston eapla lnlng hi^ ,utti>« «i V tstm I» ■>'»"> 16. Septaaher 5. 1973 r. NsCaffiey to McNeU asaviat itoae wall .was:ereetad«tCCStai 17. 18. received caylaint ftoai MeWail.) ‘ SepteAer 7, 1973 - Letter tim 3eheUer to NeCafCrey showlag ------- tifrttn gnaUng. Si«ge^ sitelttlng boUdlat plans for^tvalaallflaihjMUl^ ■- Septaaher 10, 1973 - Copy of letter fron Ndifil to NcOafftrey stithlt'^ dIttMW over existing fill and stcne wall and Intontions for additiianal to staff by McNeil. • . w *, •. r.. 19. Septeaher 12, 1973 ■ Note fron NoCaffrey to SchiUer'aaldnt^ihiinl ‘ application fem.^ • 20. Marst on previously sent hin an i^lca tion fom.^ from McCafiray to Maiiil,atitiat as previous teilt with nlMBS foo tovot nlm lifcNell and hinhe wUlddiscontlflao mm-f naintalning previous elevation because of.laha laval(ntrhitiire buUdiiig at hiiher elevation. - - 23. Ndveid)er 9, 1973 ■ Latter and note fraiMeOtfftey to >totqn a apl altti «| icwi, hardship if proper proeadkiraa are followed* .rStitaa.iatwt.‘to Mldw ordinance and coaplains about 24. fbi. fiir tm tmmtt. ' ^ 12, 1973 - Letter fron Hnstoi to NBCeffiey infondiig hlrof'prteaduni 4' __..^jsary approvals of other aganelM for raisini gradM;; A.flll pendt ' application fora la sent to McCaffrey afaln with inativetiene NO-TlIiL witiientoji^^jt application. ...v.-v.«,.-v . V .^ t* c '•*1A ' Vi .'A-* i > t ,1* Maurice McCaffrey Hge 3 - 1065 Femdale Road West 25. May 10, 1974 - Mbib from Marston to CMby s^a^g R.L.S. iTcoaplete airi ready for Cwncil action. However, the ^ memo^ only a sketch - not even a survey, 1st alone a mylar or haidaheU. ^ *« don’t have the proper nylar a^ w^iSer Mde -does not meet reoiuSenHits • Che thing is that a surv^ probably ms I will point out later how this may have resulted in damages to anotiwr nel^ibor, Mr. Sharp.) 26. Jiaie 14, 1974 - Letter from McCaffrey to Scheller informing him of periodic c*»«^ In structure - ftels it urlnportant. ^ 27. July 23, 1974 - Utter frw Robert Mitchell, repr««tlng lenrding neetlng on site with Village staff reguding fiml g«^* .lead^ appears that drainage would be directed away fr* McNail a Cmm m high polnttiSre toward the the f«t uww^rn^ • we ^Buld naturally create a p«dl^ areatojand v - . | I^mdale between McCaffrey and Rovlck propert^O • 28. July 23, 1974 - Utter from Mitchell to Sdieller stating MSteil’s gratiflcrti^j^^^^ of Q>i site neetlng. ^ ^ * X * *•* .* ^ * * * 25. 9n 1074 - Letter from McCaffrey to Mitchell suBarlxlng proposed.gradut<~' 30. October 9. 1974 - Utter f.em McCaffrey to MlteheU*’e«pUlidng:pwfi«M.m^ (Another ciMBge - tlaber retaining wall.) • . ^ .-k-.'ts >c. .. ”• !£ ^‘22t«?w^eSrMt5St.'<w »is».oo»); ■V 32. Khy 5, 1974 - Site plmi with pwjdt eepUcatlon ah 41* from lekeshere. (Actual satiiadt is wA lass* has baan nddod to stiueture with no revised puma w.. ---- application on record requesting ch«r la epproeed.aitb^ ■ i i■a ftira locatiOB bo be ' i ^aa a lOUd U* . ! wl5i^hi3?{S.*ic^^T^s*WDW hJS!S''a drainage pnUar • 1. Mr. Rovlck obtained vaiimioes from side yard, street^^ l^UiL-^ia setta^ laqirtia^ -*• aents from Council on August 27, 1973 (lakeshera-oett^ appaoval we SO )• «SO*). • _________a ^ a IlH . ammw^ *<« . J 2, Moverter 18, ____ . ▼ «r■ r■■■ h nr' ~ — — _ :!3s%i^17Sb; .sitSd« > • «. “»• .Ik V K>. • ». 3. 4 _____ 1975 - oottidl appro*** *1^ street aetback mlaneas - Ri^roa 7S* lakeshoie setback.•.k. ippli* Faotlead oe him nethtr applicatiem •sssniitt s sSitSdftr'muji,^ sT^'sSf^ir&^jissar(Scheller Infbrmm! me that this was a geed thing “ ^^SSJjjlThSS ) infbiMd him of his concern of drainsge probl«i idmm nelihbor would MtUd.) Estimsted value is 1108,000.•1 av’v^.**• 1 V’ • i! * fu Xa - • j . . I--.* *7 w»i •* Maurice McCaffr^ Page 4 - 1065 Femdale Road West 5. January 1976 • Application appeared before Planning Ccdsalon and Cowcil with grade revisions as shown on nev topog and survey. New topog included two aasoniy vetwiing walls between properties for directing drainage way froa McGaHiey's. 6. January 12, 1976 - Report fron Village Engineer reooanending several changes la drainage design • including elininating retaining walls. 7. January 12, 1976 • Council approved drainage plan subject to following: •» (a) (b) (c) (d) Plan allow only nomal fill and grading required for. house oonstruetlon. Natural fUl. City foglneer's approval. ' > 4 Retaining wall be eliainared «d£tM.left‘fo;aaCu^ 'state. -ill and grading required for . . . . . . «■--S'-:■■■ t: 1 akd/ioaa.left'ia'aaturali Since grading started in the area, we have had nothinf but probleaa.^I* MoCafand various other Staff neabers on nany dimrvt ooea explain to hln that this would be a problon between nei^dwra this aid kept calling md we kept returning. ' s Kr. Benson nd X finally net with Mr. MBCaffray aad Nr. Itovldrat 9:00 i^' S, 1976. Also present were the following - Rid: Satiire: Qmy>GaatdnW| Gary Gabriel, oontraeter's engineer and two of his fUld im; jnd tha'li NSW elevation readings were taken and all proposed grade changes. Both NeCaffrsy a of tills agrsaannt by letter (none reesived as yet). -Ito'fpait S hoan;tlMra Now to add a little frosting to tiw cake •• Jbst rseartly I'wu Skarp, the neighbor at 104S Nest fomdale. He is al line as it now nan throu^ his house. It doss, in effoetr Tenalnin'liftl'^lot*; thrauti* his house as NeCttfrey tenensed the original proporty bafoia^OMalnlag approval on the new subdivision. Skarp*s a ttorney hM also nald na a^vtaltTIn i to this although I haven't disclosed aiy of tiw wavlo ni inIbraatioa'tD is rwwlaining because he was never personally notmad of tiw court tomnsint hanupi',^£j^': an never tm then as advertised, so ha clalna ha never had..tha opportunl^ to.^obJaR'%^^,. to the isproper prope rty description. ^ • *» If we approved the subdivision based m a sketch rather than an on-slte sunev as - required, ws have a pprove d the lot line turning throujih his house. It sawn logieai«;^-^r tiiat had Coffin aade a survey he would have located two original irons as Gary Gibrlel, the contractor's surveyor, did locate the erlginal irons at tiw tlan he ^ - the survey that was subnitted for Roviek's qwlieatian* .- (I ho^ ws're not UahXe^:r^)A ■ t‘ -i;. \ '* .* *. j .q ^ . •< Vw’ •*V' \:,y -V .* ■M •* o?.c::o couNCii. iieetihg held January 12, 1976 "T have been instructed by the City Council to inf oral you that your license * **i area was due on September 30, 1975, and as or the time of this writing, you have not made an application nor have you been granted such a license. Previously, Mike Scheller of the City of Orono, informed you of this fact and sent you • of the ordinance regulating ski areas. Jtoreover, it is my understanding that you are stl^ operating or contemplate operating a ^rtion of your ski area for lAich no conditional use permit has been granted. I note event, in order to operate any part of the ski area, you must first have a license. Moreowr, in order to operate on the new portion of the 3)ci area, you must have a conditional use permit. If you do not make your application for we license by December 19, 1975, the City will tag you for violation of the zoning code and enjoin you from using that portion of the ski area. If you have any questions, please contact me." Erd of letter. Paurus moved, Butler seconded, to grant a 3iMnse to Ski Tonka for Phase #1, which Is the or*ginal ski area. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). The City Council instructed staff to document tho present status of Phase 02, which is the new portion of the ski area which requires a conditional use permit. If in operation, tags will be issued and followed up with legal enjoinment. Page 6 SKI TONKA LETTER (Continued) SKI TONKA LICENSE SRI TONKA - PRASE 2 Dutler moved, Welsh seconded, that the request for Kingdom Hall for a license to park a mobile home on the premises at 3655 Togo Road, from January 11 through January 18, 1976 only, be approved. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). LICENSE Kingdom Rail Hr. Henry Muhlch.. Building 6 Zoning Adiainlstrator, informed the City Council that Hr. Odd Rovlck, 105S West Femdale Road, has applied for a vtfiance, lot area width and street setback and that this arra is zoned LR-IA, with the following requirOTentsi (1) Lot area - two acres <87,120 sq. ft.) (2) ^t width of 200*. (3) Street setback - 50*. (4) Side- yard setback - 30". This parcel is 175* wide at the point the felling Ifi proposed to be built and consists of 0.75 acres or 32,670 sq. ft. (Continued) VARIANCE 1055 West Femdale Road I 'iiO rOL'T.'CIL IffiETIlIG HELD JANUARY 12, 1976 ’ following variances would require approval* Aron - 54,450 eq. ft. Lot v/idth - 25' Side *ntback - 15' Strf »ck - 33' ho proposed location would however, meet the 5' lakeshore setback requirement. ome conditions to be considered Jf?,. _ ostrictlons to other forms of hardcover, filling •nd grading, diversion of drainage •.'raoval. Approval should not be .. •ithout the condition of satisfactory percolation •cats and on-site disposal design. •'Tanning Coirnnlssion Meeting - December 3, 1975 •ho commission recoiwnended approval of the •^plication due to the hardship caused by tte nnll size of the lot, because no adjoining and was available and because the pro^rty was •n single separate ownership provided the following •onditions are met* . Percolation toots meet approval of the ■. The building permit cite specific City restrictions on building, grading and tree removal and roust be 75' from the lakeshore. In addition to the variances requested,a 23% variance on hardcover be allowed. That the deck construction, as oho%m on the plan, within 75' of the lakeshore, be allowed provided it is of open typo, raised construction with rock beneath and that no concrete be used. 'Tanning Commission fleeting - January 5, 1976 •''rry's Construction Company presented a •nd drainage plan for the property. The plan ncludcd swales in the front yard area to *\vert drainage away from the lakes A retaining •nil in the back lot area was included for the v.rpose of diverting drainage across we road nto a natural ponding area on the other side or 'in street, instead of it flowing into the •lijacent low area of a neighboring property. The •?n stated that 35 truck loads of fill would ^ noded on the whole site of which 5 truck loads ' luld be needed within the 75' lakeshore setback n order to make a 25' taper from the house, hey also noted that there used to be five cabins •*: the site and when they were taken down the Ttural drainage was destroyed. The C •“•'ission ->lt t!iat the retaining wall could be •. naans ' blocking a natural ponding area. (Continued) Pago 7 VARIANCE 1055 Nest Perndale Road (Continued) • r 1 1. 2. 3. 4. 0::0N0 COUNCIL tnSETING HELD JANUARY 12, 1976 The Conmiaslon reconmendad to the Council approval of the fill and drainage plan with the following stipulations: That the plan allow only the normal fill and grading required for the house plan previously presented to the City. ^Only natural fill materials be allowed in the house construction. That the City Engineer approve the plan. That the retaining wall be taken out of the plan and the area left in its natural state A letter from Engineer Rick Sathre» representing j the City’s Engineering Department, stated ttati ni, : * . • ' "In accordance with your letter of January 6/ 1976, I have made an on*slte inspection of the subject' property and have the following comments and reconinendations. The plan as submitted, entitled Drainage Plan, Proposal A, calls for the gradii^ of a drainage ditch on the southerly edge of Femdale Road to the east. This ditch, if constructed, would Z feel, result in the loss of several large trees easterly of the proposed house location in the right-of-way of Perndale Road. A dit^, if constructed, would necessitate the installation of two culverts; one each under the existing driveway and the proposed driveway. These consequences of constructing the ditch as proposed, lead me t‘ believe that this is not the proper solution wO this drainage problem. X would recommend that the owner be directed to retain the low area along Femdale Road and his northifesterly property line in its natural state and to construct a flat drainage swale between the two elm trees (to the west of the proposed house) and the westerly property This ditch should have a bottom elevation of 933. Under this proposal, the minimal amount of water normally entering this drainage way would be percolated into the soil, thereby creating no direct nm-off to the lake. Zn the event of •n large rainfall, however, the swale would allow the water which is backed up, to overflow into the lake. Zf these reeonswndations are followed, the low area will function very much as it does presently, in that the overflow m the lake at present, occurs whan the water reaches 933 elevation. This oeeurs after the pocketing of water to a depth of roughly 5 inches. Since the water would net be retained to a level higher than is presently the caae, the adjoining property owner to the west should have no cause for alarm. . Pago 8 VARIANCE - 1055 Nest Femdale Road (Continued)¥ •: f* t 1% .Vv 7 ^ * b V . j» 7 • • :&k •• A t;.-: vV'-' ' r , 4,•• ^ ^*r-« • . / >K%’• * , 1976 ": ■ Z ■ • ••' ■ -■ > •^■':t.'--.■; OVOUO COUNCIL MEETINO HELD JANUARY 12 Soarlea moved, Putler seconded, to grant Odd ' •/ VARIAHCBS . •;. • w Rovick, 1055 West Femdale Road, a lot area, width >'• 1055 ;N*st F«niid^«^Road and street setback variances and also a* variance-fronCCoatintMd) 31.203. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) Mr. Dick Benson, City Adainistrator, stated, that ' the City of Orono advertised three succeaeive weeks for street materials. and equipment rental bids with bid opening at -10100 ' Monday, January^5, 1976.V •;»,;, *' *\ • The enclosed ;’t^ttlatioa;;;e6atains a caaq accounting o£,all4bids\rscelved‘and th< commended low*>bidders aad.altematea. 't The aceepted^flow-’’ biu ;for;.materials' are by availabillty«attd»loeatiOB*^f :.Buiteria Traveling|;diataace^toiavauppller.Us a e cost factot.j^wheoirdetermlalngiawlow bid; When rentlng^.e^ipanht'with^an operator guided by the‘.type,-si so of equlpsient a rcte. ■-..1 ii>^>V • . -V.- ■ . It is potsible\‘to award the low bid to i ono contractor «dien considering material equipment. ' Zn order to stiaiulate enthui for the following year's work, we make i divide the work accoraingly among these bidders. . .'rv-. , ■r r .( i« . . 'V.j , ■■ - BISrANMU) i97dffftMc-.._ _ _ _ _ _ I' uJ ‘V\ r ^ ..V ■** • ')■ , In the event the low bidder is not avail the City reserves.the right to purchase next alternate.•• : 1 recommend that the City Council accepti awards the tabulation of bidders as presi for the calendar year 1976. r lah moved, Butler seconded, that the b: bo awarded to the deaignated low bidders' shown on the tabulation sheets for 1976 »;i materials and equipment rental. Motion, Ayes (4) - Hays (O;. -i‘r- m j Welsh moved, Butler seconded, that Resolti #658, A Resolution Dealgnating Appointmen For The Year 1976, be adopted. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). i .;*< Mr. Dick Benson, City Adnlnlstrator, atati that: . . "Please find attached a cover letter and t **'®ly*i* from William Past, who was retais as a cmsultant to evaluate the bids and« specifications;for our insor'aneo packaged •. •>*,. .T., j , *,.» ' •- ... fr*i ' 1* • - f. % Ii TO: FKM: TATE: 1C: W. R. Beison H. F. !4*lch Mowitnir 26, 1975 #77 is twpMtiag apwwml of four Vtrimcas ^ ^ tr uhich he puxcnased P. .;K “________________________________________• . several years ago. • •• ^^ ’•*.?. » .. “^* ■ t * ’ j • ^ TMs area is zoned IR-U with the foUoiring require«BiU .(l),.tot 0J«0^ acres (87,120 sq. ft) (2) Lot width <^ ?00 ft.f This parcel r'is^lTS ft »*<*• *«^ and consists ofiiTS •eras.w,32,670 sq*\£t^^^ The following^warimces would re<piire;ap^^ m • V’•(1) Area - 54,450 sq. ft. (2) Lot Width - 25 h. (3) Side yard setback - IS (4) Street Setback - 33 ft « < » • , « « The prepoa^ location wuld however, —It. ... ... h« » ^rr\ • SLSS!*JSS.S •s PLAffflNG OCM4ISSION METING - approval of the applieakl< • the lot. ditions are net: sin of _ - was in siggle separatt • i/ vplieaklai^dn^ to Wliat^i^';^^ * ^adJoiaiaf.Ind,waa)ay5l2bia:«id I c«oniapr;pNvidad;3tl»l^blM^ ------------------------------------------- (1) Feicolutin tests ant approv (2) The BuUdiBf Pendt cite---- aid tree rsaoval aid aat (3) In addition to tiie vailaitw»- i»ip»Bi»n»j>wj^j» alined. . •(4) Thai the dedc cauttuetion, as *ah0Mn|m^llio!piai iB^iaor. ■f-V^j mam- ORONO COWCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 2i, 1975 Paurus movad^ Welsh seconded* thot the requ**^ for Robert Frost* 4625 Chippewa Lane* for a street and aide yard variance* be referred to the Planning Comnlaslon. Motion* Ayes (5)- Nays (0)• Paurus moved* Welsh seconded* that the request for Roger Swanstrom* 1580 Bohn's Point Road* for a wetlands variance* be referred to the Planning Comnlssion. Motion* Ayee (5) “ Nays (0)• VARIANCE 4625 Chippewa tane,; * r.t \ ' >• VARIANCE 1S80 Bohn*0 Point.Rotd VARZANCB .loss ^weat kPemaale^Paurus moved* Welah seconded* that the request for Odd Rovlck* 1055 West Pemdale Road* for a variance* be referred to the Plarjilng Conmlsoion.v^- Hoilon, Ajr.. (5) - N.y. (0). ■ . \ — v. ... Paurus moved* Welsh seconded* that the regues^'. ’$ COMDXTIOKAL 08B PCTIIW .t*. for James McCleary* 2259 Shadywood Road* for J V 2259 Shadyie^. Ite^ a conditional use permit, be referred to tte * ,‘ • U.f Planning Commission. Motion* Ayes (5) - Nays (0)* Cheyenne Land Conpany “ Henry Muhlch* Building a Zoning Administrator* reviewed the various staff reports that had previously been submitted to the City Council and Planning Commission concerning this application for resonlng. He stated that he had llnspected the property In question on four separate occaalona and that on one of those occasions he was elmoat involved in a ear accident while attempting to drive from Highway #12 onto Orono Orchard Road. He noted that three cars tiere welting In front of him to take a left hand turn onto Orono Orchard Road and several cars were attempting to come from Orono Orchard Road onto Highway 112. This area has always been known as being hasardous In nature and such a development would Increaee the traffic flow measurably at this dangerous point. Mayor Searles noted that this area has always been dangerous for pedestrians and vehicular traffic. Muhlch noted that another dangerous traffic point was the overpass on Orono Orohard Road. At the overpass* only one car Is able to travel and on several occasions he has met other cars there and has had to pull over to allow them to peas under the bridge. Muhlch stated that he spent half the day walking through the project on one occaelon and noted thet the project la very hilly in nature and there are numeroua marahlanda end wetlanda throughout the property. He ateted thet the recent flood plain map shows thet parte of the property are In the flood plain as determined" , by the Federal government. (oUitinbad) . . . . . • CBSyENNB LAND COMPm * f *»i ,>.w f rv • ••>.- y. • •• »•(•* . .. . . % • 4 . • ^ •| }s> » v aJi t s t *v.i. I>.♦ O • • • ^ ■ • e '' ,*C£V W I'U ' 7 r /.L f’-t’ Z \ I r •4 i ' i: I U ’‘•V m /'-, • ' TA’^s *: •■. ■ • f ^ -jr*'i ■■■:• # ■ *,-m »*tU >/■ •i< h*• M "4^i • ■ G&W:* wt- -X‘. C-v, fla P > . ik - StM-- • y • • *''» to ^ \ .i*. •}!| I Ik r i i^-. :.j-r if-' : f* * « • 4 .1 \ \ -cr— •• ^ :i4^»rs—: - '* »«r ih *1 >—4^-5- 1 , ^‘'- •^-■■**—-r -N •• / / /' /J y. 3a 3 / / *r.jf^- ir • %• •• ^ ••• «UW I • « V* CITY OF ataXJ, HSWE50EA Oondltimal Ura and Vkrlanoa LOcmCN OF PROPOSAL (or faoperty) Mdreas L(/. y* ^ 1“/^ Legal Dearrlptim Trace B - RLS No« 1372 APPLICAMT AFpmncn g g i liane Odd Rovick F!»e I ’26-8339 YYPE CP mjJESr ____ Cendltlenal Use ^ Vtalanoe ____ Matlandi. Vazionoe Pee Address, OF>t4E3t Mane 6101 Halifax Avenue Souch Odd Rovick Phene * 92e«e339 Address 6101 Halifax Avenue South Present Use,Vac*Res*Preaait Zcnim Acre ------------ 34*201, 34.202, Zoning Ocdljunoa Seetien Relating to ReguaBt 34*352 FOR ORICZAL USE ONUf GDwcll action Oete__________ AporDvsd /Z**^ **7-^ Denied Sepci^ Qedlnanoe nTHiywanta Lot area - 2 acre and lot width 200* and street setback 50*_ and lakeshore setback 75' and hardcover lake setback OX to 75' '’5X to 250' and 30X to 500'. Explain Ragoest RalatiMe to Reauirewents variance requested for street setback. Jal |*^II»I'HU»I iaug-jLw*ww«>f, lot area, lot width at street* r^ctent of T4v<-or«<ftyiMly^^garparcmi£red^^acresjactual0^ lake setback reqd. 75', actual 57'5 street setback reqd* 50', actual 35'; lot width at street reqd* 200', actual 150*60': cannot meet hardcover lake setback* 'ii-vzdships to Prr^vir^ The lot is unbulldable under present toning ordinance* lenitzM. iccEssAnr for covwte AminnoN (Ftjot be submitted 1 week rrioe to Oanell Mseting) 1. Application coipleted 7. Plat Nap Section 7. Sur>aey (Sketch in proposal) "Vita !«sai< 4. ALsLractor's Certificate of ftoperty Osiers Within 30i 5. $30.00 Fee Signature li ‘-•♦Ai'nr • ' . ^ T>‘wk>. PIOCHXWE SCHHXnC 1. oeroleta ndntoun of cue weak prior to ary regularly ochaduled OnmeU fSeungT sssirtirsi^'risisw 4. w«t-Of »*la. of i«rtoa. tor approval to aaoartaln official status. 5. dgmeil ^^sats 2nd and 4ih Monday of each nonth (gfinaina Holidays) Planning 0cBmlB8lGn iiMtM Is^ aid ______ (Bccludlin^^tr.rTn Pioposals rwjulrlnj Public Hsarlngs n»y he detalnsd notloes. acc xequized in publishing Ibtal tiiM lequlxed without Public Haaring -.»• .U*- ♦^tely five wse)cB BMBPle Schedule rfafcerial SUbnitted ccior to NPvawber 3> 1975 1. oomcil rstetxal - Movwiber 1 0, 1975 2. Planning Oannissiai Action - Msv«nberl7, 1975 3. Planning Oamdssien Approval of Minites - Deonter 2, 1975 4. Ootncil final Action - Deoaiter 8, 1975 ins VAjeiA^Jces iliWTES OF A RBCUUR MEETING HELD AUGUST 27, 1973 Uutler moved, Ifelsh seconded, to grant tic variance to Odd Rovick, 104S West designing a septic system that to t;:e Village Engineer; tiiat the final acceptable Tcrndale Road, subject to the applicant system that is acceo ngineer; tiiat t plat of i4r. McCaffrey be filed;and that a variance to the current building moratorium be granted for Mr. Odd Rovick. The Council feels that a variance of ISO* from the road setback requirement should be granted due to the odd shape of tiie lot. that a SO* lake setback must be maintained, and because of the limited amount of traffic on Perndale Road. Motion, Ayes (3) • Nays (0). •« Butler moved, Welsh seconded, to approve the division of John Cross,, 26SS North Shore Drive, with the understanding that this property, which has less than 140* of lakeshore on the subdivided lot, is a negative factor for subdivisions i to be considered on the balance of the property. No further subdivisions will be allowed for the remainder of the property on the lakeshore area. Mr. Cross was asked to consult with Mr. Marstou about creating an easement that could be used for a future east-west road througii the property. Motion, Ayes (3) • Nays (0). Butler moved, Welsh seconded, to accept tlie changes as shown on the plat of Oicon, 2425 North Shore Drive, subject to the applicant paying the prescribed park fee, nnd that the application is still subject to all conditions of the initial motion made by the Council. Motion, Ayes (3) • Nays (0). Butler moved, Welsh seconded, to adopt Resolution #S04, A Resolution Approving The Vacation Of Park Avenue And Adams Street. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). t/elsh moved, Butler seconded, to instruct Mr. Ledstrom that his bam must be removed within 30 davs of today's date. Motion, Ayes (3) • Nays (0), •/clsh moved, Butler seconded, that the 'tillage of Orono accept the Antoine prop erty ps a VUlaae para and that the Villafe It ” * * ^,.ay the last half of the 1973 taxes and that the park be named after Mrs. Antoine. Motion, \yea (3) - Nays (C). VARIANCB 4 FINAL PLAT 1045 West Feradale Road v • K:*-. *.* •• *'j •* t » if !. .V .. - /*• . '* ^'** ^ . I •Jt; DIVISION • 2685 North Shore ... . *. a - . ' ...V -- .. • ' t < r 4 . V-'t..' I •# ^ ► w . I .. ..I .'■-'■VitC ^ ' DICON ' " 2425 North Shore Drive • ■ . .i- >. RBSOLUTION 9504 Vacate Park Avenue 4 Adams Street REMOVAL OP BARN • .* . w • • *. ' *.? ' ANTOINB PARK •• TO: Planning Conltsion Members raOM: Dexter Mnrston, Zoning Adninlstrator CATE: August 8, 1973 “<• »«'“««• *«. s.. PfiTXTlONBRt Odd 9 Hnui Rovlck WWATIOM: IMS Wut F«>4.1. Ro»l - »„«, AlMtiimtlM Aetloai i. RMonaiid tppronl u ‘ ' I: STcSss san" sur/rSLS: 9 S •tap.. It u IMS thsTsarrerr isa* »«.»Msa ubmusIM.M ,4tSi ui F»..stS.11 Mtteek. WMW b. «met... m‘2:J siJ ItSJsSi." k«.uss . Utility or trail oaaaMAta* * * *da<|uata .£or futuro 8U££ recoMoads approral o£ both variances. I 41 liilll -uj Uzuu Q to UJcc > LU ZJ- Qi Do U % -i < UJ L7 % •o 2o •-* O 4;*€I ^ C.•O S s 2o To;Mayor Grabek S Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Pros: Jeanne A. Mabusth^ Building & Zoning Administrator Date; Subject: June 12, 1990 #1512 Steven J. Ruce, 4625 West Branch Road After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit/Variance Continuation of Public Hearing Review of Pertinent Ordinance- Section 10.03, Subdivision 19; Conditional use permit requried for land alterations in excess of 100 cubic yards and installation of retaining walls ranging in height from 3' to 5'6". At April meeting of Planning Commission, Commission members conceptually approved a conditional use permit for the specific improvement. Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 and Section 10.08, Subdivision 5 (B): Retaining walls in excess of 3'6" in height become an encroachment requiring a setback. The following variances were also conceptually approved by Planning Commission members; Required setback = 50' Proposed = 8' Variance = 42' Allowed Height “ 3'6" Proposed = 4'4" within required 50 front yard setback Section 10.20, Subdivision 30 and Section 10.20, Subdivision 4; Although the plantings within the tiered garden area are used for clients yards and experimentation. Planning Commission members concurred that external appearance of tiered planted area is a garden, individual who maintains garden is hired by Mr. Puce and is not an employee of his business. This individual functions as any gardener for any private resident thus the area variance for crop conditional use permit under Section 10.20, Subdivision 30 is not required as garden is an approved accessory use requiring no area allotment. Section 10.20, Subdivision 4 (A); Home occupation is required for Mr. Ruce's business. As requested, Mr. Ruce has submitted a home occupation license and will seek a variance tc the standard that would require persons engaged in the business reside in the dwelling, and that there be no outside employees working at the home occupation. Zoning File #1512 June 12, 1990 Page 2 Additional Exhibits Exhibit L - Home Occupation License Application Exhibit M - Planning Commission Minutes 4-16-90 Review of Current Application - The Police Chief has reviewed the license application and has recommended approval of the license based on his review of the driving records of all persons involved with the operation. If the City is to approve the home occupation license as proposed by the applicant, a variance must be granted to the standards of the home occupation section of the code. The applicant does hire employees who do not live within the dwelling. A major concern for the Planning Commission in the earlier review was the fact that the enployeas park their cars at the site during the work day. The property appears cluttered during the day if both cars and trucks are there at ontj time. At our April meeting, the neighbors in attendance had /olunteered to accept the neighbors cars. In later discussions with the applicant, staff advised that it is more appropriate for Mr. Ruce to solve his parking problems internally rather than depending upon neighbors' properties to conceal employee cars. This is not a rare condition in our City in the granting of home occupation licenses as we have several contractors who are required to have employee vehicles stored in a concealed area during the day. The majority of these contractors have employee vehicles parked within the structures that house the work vehicles during the work day. Staff has recommended that the three employees of Mr. Ruce park their individual cars during the day within the structures that house the three trucks used in the business. Mr. Ruce has agreed finding the request very feasible based on his operation. Planning Commission members may have other alternatives for consideration. If Planning Commission recommend® approval of the variance to the home occupatons standard, tha following conditions may be considered: 1. All employee cars must be maintained within garage and storage structures during the day and cannot be parked within the outside yard area. 2. If Mr. Ruce increases the number of permanent employees (over 3) required to come to the site at 4625 West Branch Road during this current licensed year, Mr. Ruce must apply for an amended home occupations license. 3. Any others deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission. Zoning File #1512 June 12, 1990 Page 3 Review of Planning Coenission's Original Review Coenents A. Concerning the after-the-fact conditional use permit for land alterati'* '.s and construction of retaining walls, the Planning Commission ■approved the after-the-fact application and the height and locat ^on variance needed to allow the fences in excess of 3'6" to r^ijain in the front yard area. B. In regard to the issue of whether the garden area requires a conditional use permit for crop use or is recognized as an approved accessory use for garden use, the majority of the Planning Commission appreared to recognize the use as a garden/accessory use requiring no conditional use permit. C. After-the-fact conditional use permit for greenhouse to rear of detached garage was not resolved by Planning Commission at their April meeting. Once again, the options of action are as follows: 1. Denial - Require removal or change in • se of that portion of detached garage and require a|..'i leant to obtain penalty building permit for addition. 2. Approval of conditional use permit for expansion of greenhouse use and require applicant to obtain penalty building permit for addition. D. Home Occupation Variance. The following conditions were originally set forth in Resolution #1712. In addition staff has included other conditions as a result of the modifications and changes in use of this property since the original approval in 1985. 1. No retail sales activities on the property. 2. All outside storage of materials or equipment must be fenced in such a manner so s to screen the stored material from view when observea from the public street or adjoining lots. 3. No signs are permitted other than those normally allowed in residential districts. 4. Employees Involved with the home occupation are not allowed to work on the site. Zoning File #1512 June 12, 1990 Page 4 5. All employee vehicles must be stored within the accessory structures on the property during te day and all work vehicles must be s'-ored within the structures when not in use. 6. As property is substandard for the RR-IB rural r;sidential zoning distict containing 1-24 acres, no further landscaping expanasion is approved for this limited site (this includes greenhouse expansions; because of the area needed for future septic use. Isv Application Date; Date License Approved; Date License Expires; CITY OF OROMO P.O. Box 66, 1335 So Brown Rd ATOUCkTION FOR MOIOAL HOME OCCOPATIOH tlCEMSE «»MF. vSlTtffMT. flucf,// phone: ------------- ADDRESS; 4^/,y>s VAJP.^ftAMCh^ft^ I, ^ y. - - CITY.—MQim)- - - - - - - - No. of Employees within operation;_Provide Ust of n^ of employees —back of this application. Type of Business to be Operated;DER (*5rbu8 “mS* d^aya ^whlSh to**estTg^'at^ and r*?con^nd^^ on the second and fourth Monday of each month. :ssssssss9is:=:sssss:sssssBsssssrsrsssssxsBSSi sssssBs: ORONO MDNICIPAL CODE REGDLATIONS ON HOME OCCOPATIONS PORSUAHT TO SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 4 (C) Lin OF or<ci^ FINMi OFFICE niiskyd; It is unlawful for any business operating as a home oc^ji^^t^ Prohibited Home Occupation Practices. 1. # COOi "FOI(,0/jJ/yO engage in operation without proper licenses. 2. All persons engaged in the business must reside in the dwelling. 3. NO commercial signs permitted other than signs permitted in the residential zone. 4. No excessive stock in trade may be stored on the premises. 5. Over the counter retail sales is not allowed. 6. Entrance to the home occupation must be gained from within the structure. _ _ a5_,e-=5-==«»»==*»=»===»»« ThrunnMlgnId"herebragrier't^ conditions quot»J above from the Orono Municipal Code and any additional conditions the City may require. Signature of Applicant : \ /%-J ' ^ - _ _ „ . r^C^!i»^o^aoDlication, staff recommends the Date=_ii^^^tlM '" penial of License Date; Date; Signature of Zoning official; Signature of Fire Inspector;_ LISTING OP PLOYEBS: N?^E: ADDRESS t 50iZ l(AX£00 <SuV'^______ ZIP; SS3(£?1CITY: DATE OP BIRTH:OjLijiG NAME; NAME; ADDRESS; CITY; DATE OF BIRTH; NAME: ADDRESS; CITY: DATE OF BIRTH; NAME; ADDRESS; ^4^-^^ADDRESS; &f^C0KUy\! OENII/^ ZIP; .^430 CITY;_CITY; DATE OF BIRTH;DATE OP BIRTH: ZIP; ZIP; ZIP; ADDRESS; CITY;ZIP; DATE OF BIRTH; ADDRESS: CITY;ZIP; DATE OF BIRTH; !! MINUTES OF APRIL 16, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ZONING FILE #1510-RICHARD BROWN CONTINUED Kelley asked Mr. Brown if he would prefer to table this. Mr. Brown stated that he would like the matter tabled. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by Planning Commissioner Hanson, to table this application. Motion, Ayes-6, Na^4f-0, Motion passed. #1511 CITY OF ORONO 2210 WAYZATA BOULEVARD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 10:30 P.M. TO 10:32 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Planning Commissioner Hanson, to recommend approval of the conditional use permit and a 7’ setback variance. Motion, Ayes- 4, Nays-0, Motion passed. 11512 STEVEN RUCE 4625 WEST BRANCH ROAD AFTER-THE-FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 8:58 P.M. TO 9:13 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. Ruce was present for this public hearing. Mabusth reviewed the issues involved with this application. Mabusth suggested that it may be appropriate for Mr. Ruce to apply for a Home Occupation License. Kelley asked Mr. Ruce if the commercial use of this property has Intensified since the conditional use permit for the greenhouse was first issued. Mr. Ruce explained, "The garden has two purposes. The terraced area is used for growing plants to sell off~site in my garden business. I'm not a landscaper, I'm a garden designer and in order for me to make the business profitable, I grow the plants I can on the site rather than acquiring them from another source. The second reason for the garden is that I am interested in growing plants that I can cross-pollinate to create different varieties. I tried to make the garden aesthetically pleasing. The only mistake I made is that I did not go through the proper channels to do that. I'm sorry that happened. It was due to my own ignorance more than anything." - 11 - h t i MINUTES OF APRIL 16, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ZONING FILE #1515-RUCE CONTINUED Kelley asked Mr. Ruce if he employs persons and if so, if they leave their vehicles at his house to - go to various work sites. Mr. Ruce replied, "I have employees that come to the site and we take vehicles from the site. I have hired a person to work on the garden itself, but he is not an employee of my business and does not work for my clients. Hanson stated that he views the construction of the additional garage as an intensification of the site and that concerns him. He said that the expansion of the garden does not trouble him, but rather it is an appropriate use of the land. Hanson said that the Code does not work well if it makes no provision for addressing the issue of vehicles being left at the site by employees. Mabusth stated that vehicles are not to be parked on the site. Mabusth suggested that the Home Occupation may be more acceptable if the company vehicles were taken home by the employees rather than stored on this lot. She said that it is the way the applicant's home occupation is conducted that violates the intent of the Ordinance. Mabusth suggested that staff could work with Mr. Ruce to make revisions in "the way the business is run. Mr. Laverne Dunsmore, a neighbor, stated that Mr. Ruce's property is beautiful and has been enhanced tremendously. Mr. Jim Steffinson, a neighbor to the west, said, "Steve's business is unlike any other. He is not a landscaper, he is a gardner and is very low key. You can talk to any of the neighbors and they will all agree that Mr. Ruce has very little impact on the neighborhood. It is a beautiful area and we would like it to remain." There were no further comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was continued. Bellows indicated that she was only concerned with the trucks and the employees. Kelley indicated that he is concerned about employees going to work at a res»idential site. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Hanson, seconded by Planning Commissioner Cohen, to table this to allow time for staff to work with the applicant. Motion, Ayes-6, Nays-0, Motion passed. - 12 - To; ProB: Dates Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator June 13, 1990 Subject: #1527 Lyndon S. Bill Stubbs, 2555 Fox Street - Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing List of Additional Exhibits Exhibit I - Planning Commission Minutes of 5/21/90 Exhibit J - Revised Survey Designating Building Envelope and Drainageway Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) - Reav-lred = 87,120 s.f. or 2.0 acres Existing Per East Lot Line of Foxwood & Foxwood Addn =» €3,598 s.f. 1.46 acres Total Area of Dry Buildable Exclusive of 15' Wide Drainageway = 1.40 acres (1.04 acres per Auditors Subd. #229 - area of property prior to finalization of torrens action) Status of Application - The applicant's surveyor has submitted a revised survey designating the drainageway and confirming the dry buildable area exclusive of the drainageway. In addition, the revised plan designates the required building envelope. Staff has also defined a 26' setback from the drainageway re-establishing the west line of the building envelope. Staff was also asked to determine a method to regulate the size of the house within this severely limited building envelope as a future residence wi3 1 he limited to 4 bedroom (600 gallon per day use level). The f.t'tic limitations shall automatically piovide controls on the number of bedrooms for a future residence. As for controls on the size of the structure, staff suggests review the following: 1. Future owner placed on notice that the water use for the residence structure is limited to 600 gallons per day. Residence must be installed with a meter to determine water use levels. The City will ask that the current owner of the residence submit an annual reading of the meter on approximately June of each year. Zoning Fiel #1527 June 13, 1990 Page 2 of 3 2. No setback variances are to be granted for the proposed structure. Said structure must meet the 50' setback from the street lot line and the 26' setback from the drainageway and the wetland areas. 3. No grading or filling will be allowed within the 26' setback area. Applicant is to design a house that will provide minimal impact on the existing elevations. Based on staff's original memo, please note that the only excavations to be allowed in the protected area will be the modifications to the drainage ditch that intersects the current building site. 4. Prior to drafting final building plans for the site, future owner/developer shall be required to meet with the Orono staff to review the special conditions of this variance approval. 5. Any others deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission. Options of Action - A) Denial. Please refer to the necessary findings in the variance section of the zoning code; or B) Approval of the lot area variance of Lyndon S. Bill Stubbs requiring approval of a 23,522 s.f. or .53 acre variance based on one or more of the following findings: 1. There is no additional dry buildable land adjacent to the property. 2. Adequate and suitable area for on-site septic development has been found in the upper elevations of the property. 3. A house can be located on this .site meeting all required setbacks from wetlands and street. 4. The location of the house will provide minimal impact on existing residential development to the west. 5. Although the contiguus dry buildable envelope is limited to 1.4 acres in area, the total property consists of 20t acres. ■ [ 3 I iL I : 3 5 I Zoning Pile #1527 June 13, 1990 Page 3 of 3 Approval is subject to the following conditions; 1. On-site septic area is to be protected during construction as this may be the only suitable area on the property for septic development. 2. Prior to developing detailed site plans and final building plans for this site, future owner/developer shall meet with the Orono Building & Zoning staff so that the special conditions of this variance approval may be reviewed. 3. Upon application for a building permit, developer shall provide a grading plan altering drainageway. Such a plan shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 4. Special conditions limiting size and residence structure as recommended above. 5. Other conditions deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission. 6. Variance application shall not be scheduled for formal action by the Council until torrens action is finalized by the courts. I ■t < E : ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 21, 1990 ZONING FILE 11524-TRINITY PRE-SCHOOL CONTINUED if the program were offered at less than three hours. It was moved by Moos, seconded by Hanson, to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for Trinity Lutheran Church for a pre-school program, subject to staff recommendations 1 and 2. Motion, Ayes-6, Nays-0. -Motion passed. #1525 WILLIAM ft JOAN WROBLEWSKI 630 PARK LANE VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 9:06 P.M. TO 9:10 P.M. Joan Wroblewski was present for this matter. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate uf mailing were duly noted. Gaffron reviewed the information contained in his memo dated May 15, 1990. Kelley asked Ms. Wroblewski why she needed the additional porch area, Ms. Wroblewski replied that she would like enough room to be able to sit on the porch. There were no comments f~ipm the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. Hanson asked whether it would be possible for the applicants to place a roof over the porch without obtaining variance approval. Gaffron stated that a future variance would be required since the roof would constitute an encroachment of the 35' street setback. It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Moos, to recommend approval of the hardcover variance to construct a concrete addition to the porch slab. Hardcover in the /5 —250 zone shall be reduced to 45.6%. Motion, Ayes-5. Cohen, Nay. Motion passed. #1527 LYNDON S. (BILL) STUBBS 2555 FOX STREET VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 9:11 P.M. TO 9:30 P.M. Mr. Stubbs was present. Mabusth reviewed the information included in her memo dated May 17, 1990. Han.«ion asked, taking into consideration the drainageway that - 13 - ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 21, 1990 ZONING FILE #1527-STUBBS CONTINUED will r’jn through the property, whether there is sufficient land for a building envelope and septic sites. .• Mabusth replied that there will not be room to construct a large home, but the lot can sustain a reasonably sized (4 bedroom) residential structure. Kelley a^ked Mr. Stubbs what hardship he has for requiring a variance to the two-acre standard. Mr. Stubbs stated that there is no additional land to acquire. He said there will be no impact on adjacent properties. Bellows asked whether a setback variance to the septic code will be necessary. Gaffron replied that such a variance will need to be granted by staff. He stated thac in this case, with the drainfield sites located approximately 15’ higher than the marsh area, he has no concerns. He noted thac a trench system is recommended for this property. Johnson favored the development of one residential site amongst 26 acres of land. Kelley asked whether restrictions as to building size should be established. Hanson stated that the capacity of the septic system zould be used as a guide for the house size. Gaffron suggested that the number of bedrooms allowed for the home be recorded in the chain of title for the property. Bellows expressed concern about the use of bedrooms as a control. She stated that a four-bedroom house rould still have 10,000 s.f. Bellows questioned whether it will be possible to sufficiently legislate the deve..opment of this lot. She suggested that this may be another parcel of land that is not meant to be developed. Cohen concurred with Bellows. Gaffron noted that there are ways, through the variance process, to regulate the size of the house in accordance with the capacity of the septic systems. He cited a particular application for property on Castlake Street where that was done. He also noted that septic systems are reviewed whenever permits are requested for additional bedrooms. There were no comments from the public regarding '■his matter - 14 - I ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 21, 1990 ZONING FILE #1527-STUBBS CONTINUED and the public hearing was closed. Kelley suggested tabling this application to allow time for staff to determine a method to regulate the si.:e of the house on this lot. It was moved application #1527. Motion passed. by Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to table Motion, Ayes-5, Nays-0, Hanson abstained. #1529 JOHN B. THIESSE 3845 BAYSIDE ROAD VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING Jz32 P.M. TO 9:38 P.M. Mr. Thiesse was present. Gaffron reviewed the information contained in his memo dated May 15, 1990 relating to this application. Hanson asked where the septic system is xocated on this property. Gaffron explained that it is on the lake side of the house, and when the lake is high, it is below lake level. Hanson expressed concerns regarding the location and questioned whether he could permit further development of the property. Kelley stated that it may ultimately be necessary for Mr. Thiesse to use a holding tank to serve his septic needs until sewer is available.. Gaffron stated that the area for the proposed garage could not be used for repairing or replacing the septic system. He noted that the DNR is in the process of revising regulations that will require the City to address the location of the septic system. He said the issue of sewer/septic is separate from this application. Mr. Thiesse presented photogiaphs showing his property and the property adjacent to his. .Mr. Thiesse noted thac he had talked with Mr. Don Jaq'ues from Hennepin County regarding access onto Bayside Road. Mr. Jaques did not express any concern for Mr. Thiesse's proposal. Mr. Thiesse asked the Planning Commission if they would consider a turn-around area in their motion. He stated that he did not include it in the application because of the existing hardcover, but would like to have it. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. - 15 - / I L' V C r^' r i ?. - A i-v . ’1 • / I » M L V » * M » I *; *r* :> •') e -.11 ^v'V i ■> '.-' ’1 i\ ki / I \ J \. i rr^r V v" / ft ^45 V-^ /, ■C*. ''' ^'' ^ Scr / / // / \\\> pi lilin \ /z-S::>v\\ \ N «X\\ z V ’ ^ ±A■IW .// \ \\ ^'- T •^■foi.' \^'A7^-'?T^;'7//■' i i^y* ... ,4 -nzii — oibof . f• • *• JJI A 1». * -5" I t rw :iX>,. I v PX". . .. -'Vp-.:."':^, , 1mm.m -I f m Vl ;t!■ J. n n \) 1|^iJ s' \" N T^ i «»aff f^„»9»,0N eisfctt eD_,mrit,»M h I \i (ij.iGGy P'P.GOC'VPO m '■. :k.: .._J -*■! '■ •' .'t ^V'. , ' -N •* ■'••^ h! ‘ 1iS53v.’\ ( .'» A ** -sV- • ^1- 09^ Cl if • ! ^ ■ I * ll' U'‘ r \• Y 09 ctX^^“ •5" V5•% 15 5* li «< 1 «»•<«• “I V-/j V PU7Kj / •• > n '/. / /<f / / /; » •/V / / 5 5 /// .<* / '* « > M QPQP^ON \ / /OKl Va> •2 COC/Y' Xl'j^ A i"^ _ V . I .TTJi 3 - . ✓ U tt‘ C c *o .1 ■ ■ t •o c <o L • c o >. s: a — > i i. • • 3 ». e> */i -* « UJ o c at c t. z « •• O — i* oco • • •/» w«« u ^ Q »•> Z «' c M. — C* u. c* c. o c c. O UJ .. ’ ^ • %•* iyA /% s* r»*?^A >< *'■ . . •• '• . .• ..••. .♦*'• ;5»->4 ’ .. ••* ,4 ^ \ '.'. ‘V-"4 • « •• ■ • p 4 • '! . A . • .*. T3^*CO) to r u-r: c TO __ Q CUTD-C I- C C QTO TO *“•* *.• *2^* ‘.v-^ v.V* *-'.1 •v if • f •«.-. </} % u (DC OJ Z O o> — c>»tocu — o > > c I. I^UJ 3 O) c/) Q — 3 — I/) CO > 0>*c w (D *• * •. St3 0; >10. >• r? ^ • — c- 0> . 4-» 0» C_ - 1-3 OI c U 3 — 3 3 o CD TO . IL. 0> ( o) e E xr TO» > —o—‘ % •4 51* ^ 3c ;'. » ; ^ . v ' : f- o k- vn • Q m « ^ o *0 ii o> e u • c o c — rsj c I w •-• ro •* f I Tb:Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Prom:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:June 13, 1990 Subject: 11532 Fullerton Properties, Inc.,^225 Sixth Ave. N. Preliminary Subdivision “ Continuation of Public Hearing Zoning District - R-lB Total Area - 36.8 acres Additional List of Exhibits Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit L Exhibit M Exhibit N Cook Report 6/1/90 CMP 7-15 CMP Map 14 Map of Septic & Building Locations Grading & Drainage Plan Revised Preliminary Plan Lot Configuration The DNR has staked the OHW for Dickey Lake at the 987' elevation. The Minnehaha Creek Watersh*43 Distict has confirmed that this will also be the elevation of the flood plain. Note the water level of Dickey Lake is still at approximately 985+'. On the final plat Dickey Lake shall be shown at the 987' elevation and wetland area surrounding the 987' elevation as drainage easements. All lots meet the 2 acre dry contiguous area requirement as previously discussed at your May meeting. The shared lot line between 6 and 7 has been moved further north to ooen up the building and septic envelope for Lot 7. This has no impact on Lot 6 as the obvious building site and septic locations are to the extreme east of the lot. Staff had originally approached the Planning Commission on the issue of a permanent conditional use permit for the installation of accessory structures on the through lots. Lots 1, 2, 4 and 5, Block 1. If this meets with the Planning Commission's approval it should also be noted that all of the pertinent sections of the accessory structure code are applicable and that the following specific setbacks for the installation of accessory structures would be applicable: L. Zoning File #1532 June 13/ 1990 Page 2 Lot 1, Block 1 - 50' rear street setback/ 50' side street setback Lot 2, Block 1-50' rear street setback Lot 4, Block 1-50' rear street setback Lot 5/ Block 1 - 50' rear street setback III all cases no accessory structure shall be located in front of the front line of the principal residence. Septic In dealing with the DNR on the determination of the OHW for the plat/ staff was reminded that Dickey Lake is classified as a natural environment lake requiring certain specific setbacks for structure and septic systems and although the City has not adopted the shorelands regulations the City will be required to adopt such regulations within the next 2 to 3 years. Some members may have been on the Planning Commission when the North Stream Plat was approved. The question of special setbacks for Lydiard Lake classified as a natural environment lake were acc'^pted by the City in the approval of the plat. The surveyor has been asked to locate the 200' setback from the OHW/ 987' elevation/ for structures/ and the 150' setback required for all septic systems. Note that Lots 9 and 10/ Block 1 have alternate sites located less than 150* from the OHW. A third site has been selected within each of the lots as a potential alternate site located out of the 150' setback area. Technically the City cannot ask for the 150' setback at this time. The third site has been selected as a precaution for the future owner. Once the DNR shoreland regulations are adopted alternate Site 2 on both Lots 9 and 10 would not be permitted by the DNR. Gaffron has reported that he is satisfied with the septic results and mapn-?ng. His only concern is for Lot 8/ Block 1. Upon a site inspection/ we have observed a dry peat soil with an underlying layer of gray loam that may prove unacceptable for septic drainfield use. Gaffron will meet with the on-site septic evaluator who may have more experience and familiarity with this type of soil. Gaffron adds that the septic envelope can be moved in the proposed house location if necessary. He should be able to provide direction by the time of the Planning Commission meeting. Grading# Drainage and Road Plans There are no major changes in the grading plans originally proposed by applicant. Detention area is now located above the flood plain elevation within Lot 7. Grading limits have been defined within Lot 1/ Block 2 and Lots 4 and 5 and Lots 7 and 8/ Zoning File #1532 June 13, 1990 Page 3 Block 1 because of the proximity of septic envelopes adjacent to road outlots and proposed drainage improvemnts. The grading plan to define a swale between the shared lot lines of Lots 2 and 3, Block 2. Applicants representative should be asked to respond. A minimum drainage easement of 10 feet to each side of shared lot line shall be designated and dedicted between Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Lots 7 and 8, Block 1 and Lots 2 and 3, Block 2. The detention pond within Lot 7 shall also be designated as a drainage easement. The City Engineer's report has asked for certain modifications in the engineering plans for the road to provide a flatter grade coming into the T intersection of the roadways (PUI at Station 8+00 move to 8 + 25). In that same report, the Engineer calls for a 40' right-of-way width from the center line of Willow Drive for the entire length of the plat. It is based on the directives set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Review Exhibits J and K. Willow Drive is clasified as a minor arterial requiring a total 80' right-of-way width. In addition Cook notes that the drainage ditch along Willow Drive should also be altered in accordance with the City standards. 8 Cox Property Note the revised plan has excluded Jim Cox's 1 acre homestead property. An outlot has been shown surrounding the exception as originally shown in the Sketch Plan Review. Mr. Cox is not required to join in the plat by designating the entire land holding as a lot. Mr. Cox has been advised that the City must ask for the 7' of additional right-of-way from the outlot. Staff has met with Mr. Cox and he has advised that he would prefer that there be no additional right-of-way taken from the outlot. The City staff has advised that it would not be consistent if the City did not acquire the 7' of additional right-of-way and has agreed to execute a special agreement with Mr. Cox. Such agreement would have the City vacate the unused portion of dedicated right-of-way of Willow Drive pending final resolve of the upgrading of Willow Drive whether as a future County road or an upgraded City road based on MSA standards. During this interim period the City would agree that it has no right to remove special plantings or improved lawn sections located in the newly dedicated right-of-way of 7'. It should also be noted that the outlot area, although designated as an outlot, may be used for the construction of residential accessory structures as outlot will be legally combined with the exception typical of all lot line rearrangements. All accessory structures would receive credit of the principal residence on the exception portj-on the property. The subdivision chapter requires that when outlots are created, the specific use of these outlots must be defined in the final resolution approving the plat. Pending resolve of the septic issue for Lot 8 staff finds the proposed 13 L Zoning File #1532 June 13, 1990 Page 4 let plat to satisfy all standards of the subdivision and on-site septic regulations of the City and grants a lot width variance to Lot 6, Block 1. Staff would recommend approval based on the following conditions: 1. To grant a permanent conditional use permit for accessory structure installations on Lots 1, 2, 4 and 5, Block 1 based on setback envelopes set forth above. 2. Park dedication based on previous fee schedule - plat filed April 1990 - $200 for 12 lots at $2400. Please note no charge for lot that contained former residents. 3. Execution of agreement with James Cox dealing with Interim use of additional right-of-way of Willow Drive ’nd eventual vacation of unused portion of additional right f- way upon determination of final upgrade of Willow Drive whether by City based on MSA standard or as future County road. 4. Special designation of use of out lots. Out lot A - To be legally combined with the Jim Cox homestead property consistent with previous lot line subdvisions of lot line rearrangements. Upon legal combination applicant has right to construct accessory ccructure or use for other permitted accessory uses. Outlet B - Designated for future road extension to the south. Outlet C - Interior road outlets to be constructed upon final plant approval. 5. Applicant to grant road and utility easements over Outlets B and C to the City. 6. Applicants to execute maintenance agreement to assure shared ownership and upkeep of private roads. 7. Applicant to grant drainage easements over all drainage easements shown on the plat. 8. Prior to any land alterations or road construction on this site, the following septic envelopes must be fenced: Lot 1, Bl-jck 2 - Septic envelopes 1 and 2 Lot 5, block 1 - Septic envelope 1 Lot 8, Block 1 - Septic envelopes 1 and 2 ■ if I Bonestroo Rosene Anderlfk & ly I Associates Engineers & Architects Ctto G BoreUfoa PE »0Ofrt W Pciene. PE JOifph C An-^enik. PE Vj.'vm i Sorv^j PE P<hartJ E Vh^ PE ;j*Tv? c C .cn PE Genn P CooiL P * Thorr^ai E PE 9oe>erT G SchufKht PE iiijo M EDW. C PA vth A Gcyoon PE P<na»d W Poster. PE DonaK) C BuegjnS. PE ^ .e^/ A Bourooo PE Mjrn A Hanson PE < F«ekJ PE M<hae< T Rautmann. PI Pocert » PfpPWie. PE ' David O Losfeou. PE Tromas W Petenon. PE V^haciC LyTKh PE I James R Ma<and PE •Cfnnetn P Anoersort PE Mar« R BoPs. PE »A omis E Phio j Cas>A««. ^ Ismael Mamnen PE Mart O Wtail PE Thomas B Anderson. AIA Gary P lyander PE. Mies S Jensen PE L Phi^ Gravn ;i PE. “RreeevP ’umart AlA Agr« M Rmg. AIC P -^#cry Pertzsch. PE |D'fv«f. PE Encuon LtoM PjMesicy HartanM Oson fit • • wm i 1390 May 30, 1990 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Re: File No. 139 - 1532 Fullerton Properties Kings Run Dear Jeanne, Ue have reviewed the grading plan for the Kings k:*" subdivision. The right-of- way for Willow Drive should be ao feet along the entire length of the plat. The ditch along Willow Drive should be graded in accordance with City standards. Silt fencing should be shown on the grading plan. The PVI at Station 8+00 should be moved to 8+25 to provide a flatter grade coming into the tee intersection. The following is the bid security required for the project: 5,000 3,500 650 2 Cu.yds Common excavation i $2.00/cu.yd. Ton Class 5 lOOZ crushed i $8.00/ton Bituminous surfacing i $22.00/ton Seeding w/4" topsoil & mulch € $1,000.00/Ac Ton Acres 50Z Increase TOTAL BID SECURITY REQUIRED Please contact this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK i ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRCtli $10,000.00 28.000.00 14,300.00 ?.0Q0.QQ $54,300.00 97.1 Sa.OQ JC1.450. WP51 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 TRANSPORTATION JUNE, 1980 PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL A Principal Arterial is a grade-ieparated, high capacity, controlled access highway designed to move vehicles through an area, not within a community. Principal arterials have no local land use access. The only principal arterial near Orono is that portion of State Highway 12 that becomes limited-access east of Orono’s eastern boundary with Wayzata. INTERMEDIATE ARTERIAL An Intermediate Arterial is a controlled-access , moderateTy high capacity highway designed to move vehicles between cities and, in Orono*s situation, between the free-standing growth centers and out-state cities west of Orono into the metropolitan area. Intersections are limited and controlled. Land use access is intended to be limited to major traffic generators without direct access to residential properties. State Highway 12 is an Intermediate Arterial through Orono although many access and intersection characteristics are typical of a minor arterial or collector. JURISDICTION: STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH: MINIMUM 100 FEET FOR TWO LANE HIGHWAY MINOR ARTERIAL A Minor Arterial is a controlled access, moderate capacity street or highway designed to move vehicles within planning subregions and between adjacent subregions. The Lake Minnetonka Ring Route is a minor arterial functioning to move, principally commuters and truck traffic, from the western Lake Minnetonka communities into the urbanized areas of the Twin Cities. The minor arterial route channels traffic away from Lake Minnetonka to State Highways 12 and 55, and in the near future, to a direct intersection with Interstate 494 in Plymouth. Land use access is intended to be limited to major traffic generators and local street intersections without direct access to individual residences. JURISDICTION: HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH: MINIMUM 80 FEET FOR TWO LANE HIGHWAY COLLECTOR A Collector street functions to collect traffic from local streets and move it to neighborhood activity centers or to intersections with minor or intermediate arterials. Local land use access is permitted but is regulated as to location and number with direct access to be avoided whenever alternative local street access is available. Intersections with other collectors are often controlled with Ligi.als or with four-way stop signs. Traffic usage is moderate. JURISDICTION: COUNTY OR CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH: 60-66 FEET CMP 7-15 C_) I /X” ct: UJ h- ct: ar ^ / z o J -J >-<c c • c »—t lU »—1 ^ •or:H-ct: Li-J UJ otH-♦—1 h~a:<ct: •X Q o »- a. -*_Ui o q:CH Ct UJ I—1oUJo__j '“D H-—j UJ-c JET 1—1 o CJ51>—1 5:o CO V < * V "i\ 0■ H v/ V. •v. 0 / •V. f, rT-y—I'I T‘.,i'\“*- ,(J) \ t*' ^ \ M a»4Aa • I >•»«*»«* ka« k • .>•••. «*«» I ■% \ /;n \ ♦ I■ I fill 11W ‘jlS*« 11 n"l 111 1 i? w lir-’L ■i« V... '',■'••■ fii t. j tftrv^4 II Ti '• t • .1 K "•'■ •. Illllllllll _______/- •! Iwai^^iiiiSll'iiiHMjliiriiiiiimiiiiiiiiiI—•! !^ <m Illllllllll 1^1 IIIII iiiiiiiiiiiTiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii I I X \\x> /%‘n) 'I Xm.MIIIIIIIIII i,,! \?rw / /<A vi/(^ >1 \'^x ■• / 'x' $------ / \wVt-V\V.w.jki jf' . • . -— / / i '■) • V- >■-■'/.,■ ■ 'A,' i /. .! « 2 \ 7 ‘ R\>:.4i' •f’- , V-,i\ ^ ' • -2 ^ • \t Y“' I, I C/> ^ It # ^/( IA?-.’ir:. : ; .V : / /«• H ■ (I; ,'J''"'r'^ / Jt /' '•! / ’f, lii^—\! yS'' y ■/ / / S ' ( '-M \ . ^ 5 1 1*“^—w------ r '>I .1 <c >—4 cn UJ h- cc —J «^c >-<c <•c *—•UJ ►—*•• 9 ^ •cr:h-CC LU <C Uj cc H“*—*1 —q:<ctl o o Q.<r.UJ <h- C_)CJor&cc UJ *—» o UJ o —j '-3 I—_j UJ mcZ *—4 o CJ -i.*---*5:o lyO ■ I ■v‘‘ V, • V >' ! ./ix; /\ r W ■ ■■V h W-^-/ i \W 'iI / ,• S' ^1 / ^ ^ •“■li U' j V \/ «*• * 99 •t V c <1 »l! :ir’ il 'i 111 • 11II11 1 11 j I'l 111II11 j III) 1 111 11 1111 1 1111 1 A* y li I I ■i^ 111 lU^i 111 (II I11 Ti 11111111II1111111 22 ■ ’ • I—•< r ‘ i 1111111 1 1 1 1 ISl 1111 1 1111111111111111111 M 11111111 .r' f - ! y V I' ii,M II Minimi/. ^ ' .• 'O, I ;:*.. / ; A K ‘ • •••l '''i&\\§iii\ I*, ml 1-^f XI •>.. ‘t N ■• - / / ,1 u I'l * '»- •-/ I * A • / ‘ * • ^ / o' • : •i''x •\ ' x'- ‘ • V ') ri z / '--I '■:/' A \T,z-i^‘{ : • .#A /----------“rl iJ|c •i Ik / •Aif^ ''-.I: , i V j r ’ / ; Ifl . i ' •.»» • V. .S.V. » - ■ V.-.- :•*•':»*•<■•* ‘ ^ r»V-/4« •• #• • €••••• • • ■ H ■ ' I ^*/ms0r J tPrfC J ____' J-nr(M A*€A Ac rcrxf^r Jr^rx SrSrwM AM€A Ezz r SCAte: 11NCH « 100 FFCT date ; 0-11.00 IN & QRONBERG. INC. NEERS & LAND SURVEYORS I 'IT nimirf'-HT.' . t - .. j -rr' SHADOWOOD FARM • .-*!£ ■ > f /r»» ft I o-S \\ y, ' / ✓ • tmn - This ^ y—oj ^l\&' ® i\ »# fl r 'Ar 1/ ^'*i\ ' ^' 4* w /tf x\ ,,, . f M'ra’M* #/ /«^ vv SHADOWOOD FARM 0^, 0* 40,0 0 r:-7 6-11-90 , I i V.ne members of the Orono Council: Ve are asking for your cosideration on the easement aquisition of our property (outlined on the attached pu;ci drawings). As we understand, the council is the only authority able to exempt our home from the easement aquisition. Our property. Parcel A. is our homestead. Parcel B. deeded and recorded in 1968. has separate abstracts and has been in our ownership since then. e are asking for a concession from the council to not take the 7 foot frontage strip. We ask to plat as sketch #2 shows. We feel this arrangement makes stnse since it is in accord with your present zoning. However, if you will not concede the seven foot aquisition, we intend to proceed with sketch 91, and ask the following: (1.' If, in the future, the roadway is realigned making the aquisition unnecessary, the seven foot strip would be returned »o the present owner of the adjoining property (in^U N. Willow Drive). (2.) We understand this aquisition will have no effect on the present Ingress-engress road access of Parcel B in sketch #1. (3.) If any alterations of the seven foot strip becomes necessary, we would appreciate the opportunity to relocate our flower beds, trees, shrubs and fences presently on the strip. Your time for consideration on this matter is greatly appreciated. Mr. and Mrs. Jim Cox Property owners: 1020 N. Willow Drive 7 Orono Planning Conunission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Pro»! Jeanne A. Mabusth, Buildin? s Zoning Administrator Date: June 13, 1990 Subiect: #1537 Calvin Presbyterian Church, 177 Glendale Dr, conditional use Permit - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance- section 10.;.9, Subdivision 3 <*> = irruc”ure'muefreTooa\°^^^ surrounding residential lot lines. Pr^osed = 100+’ from all residential lot lines List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E Application Property Owners List Plat Map Menard's Spec Sheet Elevations Exhibit F - Survey Review of Current Application - The Church proposes storage/garage ,^°^24' and will be at a maximum height of 12-. The structure shall located 100+' parking lot as noted above. Th r has received no from all residential 1°^ lines. ine ^ approval of comments from adjacant Pre^sbyterian Church finding the proposed structure for • e^ction 10 28, Subdivision 3 proposal meets all ordinance. (A) and pertinent sections of the accessory Isv 1 \ APP&XCATIONCITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address / 7 7 /f^ PjT. <C > 41 r^rv /:r ii . t- :fUhmw\rw Ut I ac-fc. •T n i rni V X Uwf t __, , ^.aaa jl 150.00/ RECilPT-JH^K YOU—----^-!tir7-^0 cool HOI ri2:^05/1%/kProperty Identification Number (V.I.'D.)'%Q-/1 J3 ^ 3 nCfD j — Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name ,/2»/ry/»>/<* /C Phone (home) y/*-^ __^Phone (work) Address ^ /l^a ,\Jtficjco rf ,/)r. city 4?a.^ /Cc'A'-r- Zip_jHC2G^ OWNER (if rifferent than app]icant) Phone (home) 5'"V/f Name ^tji*c h*/ /'a ^ •, »^.^Phone _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Address /7 7 C•_ _ _ _ _ _City Lr^jL^e, Zip ^S'SSTC Date Property Acquired I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. (month/year) PEES - CONDITIONAL OSE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee -.Double Current Application Fee $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use K- $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) __ $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _ $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and fil.ling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS _ _ _ _ $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation ^ $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $250.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRBSBMT OSB OP PROPERTY « - ^ Present Zoning District K “ f Present Use of Property UITC^ Residential _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OtHer (specify) OBSCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail; ___ f~r:>IT 1*9 «e» <T REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners • . List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Mao. 5. 6. 7. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11" X 17” OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )uiowledge. Applicant's signature tl^ best of his/her jjn Date '7'9d OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby aclcnowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council .’.e'l.he'S for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date 5'7' 70 Applicant must have all(-eubmit':als into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of isch month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Comirlssion and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. os K» ^ Ma ■ r ^I » J**! •V r os Kl CO Ma »- 8 O. Ul QC I e #1537 ^o « ^ o a < Ul fO «i si I U4 CO -I •H C I Kl sf vO »H (SJ O K O SfS M Kla in o m s§« ao <n QC « § S 9 uj UJ *i8 O ri ^ Mo ae o o Kl Ul K> -J «( K\ g M 2 ' Ul CO -I •H O IH I •H <M O t% O >0 in -J S Kl < M in I- Ul oe: in Ul X o £ UJ Ul z M a -i Z UJ u. < X Q tuK z S ^ UJ Ul <a g -I 1 ^ 55 z -I ^ z UJ rH o -J ^ iH ^ o oe o o K> Ul m -I si I UJ CO •J3« I m M O'o M O o Klt:t: a< <^ ^ oc Z S o M K4 Z ^ ^ UJ Z < UJSS-' UJ -J Ul UJ> > o 55 M K4 Z -J _J M O O O ^ ^ }fi I o zui : O'ino z o o Kl Ui Kl -J < Kl a <si z I UJ CO -J^ o < nO in V- in Kl Ul < QC Ulgam !3 *“ UJ 2< Z ^ £ 1 Kl O nT «SJ o f'* O _ < o Q UJz ^ z ^ o Z ^ -I -J o o 5 X r '3 0 0^-1 K> O'o s o o Kl UJ Kl -I < Kl O f>j zI 111 a -I ^ o iH I U. U.u. u. o o s^ su u UJ UJ nOu> K| Ul X U)o = " s z z < a UJ Z UJ < s fU o o </M/1 O ►K »H O 882 «J -J f-l s M S O O o zu < I-o u<u. UJ mS ou.> Ul*— os9 Z K4 H »- Z UJ IH O a o UJ Ul >u. M « Ul c- UJ u. u.o o \Cf I (12) ( »5)OuTior 3y-/^'23 . (25) ) :e) 9 % WOOOHAVEN DR * ns tioooi a V^"** 1 J.6) 1 (.7) ; 1 TfllW km I •0 •fSt ‘3 TTrST •II. u (10) HT73T SBs (20) '''’-?'i.V>a • 11 ’-V i: 3-/.;? 1,'U 3 (9 1 r*A (9) - (10) (H) (S4)(»: ji 3 (»2) II •• m:s 3 S 2^(10) g 9* iTTirajjur - -U5i,P.b 4 •4; ss s; f S (19) ^ ’<♦^1 - 13 oI ( 18) s lauL nmkdz. nw I 1. = (45) - t “ 2t 1*6 ;i «?n y? V4PLE 8 «;,!« *• ^...; / 4 W““““ ‘ (22) « K 125) P fO w S * “(21) 30 L ii*:i "(^ 93 2? i It ’ «(24) 'TO L C •n '4 ^5) ' ' ' IM s '•> . ' (•«) ' (55) • a I n 301. ii (57)»« M D Do-It-Yourself Step-By-Step Garage / Construction 10 Easy Steps to Do-It-Yourself Garage Construction step 1 Consult local building code requiremen's for concrete slab on grade specificalions. Step 2 Lay out perimeter ol garage using string 'ine and batlerboards (see ligure 1). Set concrete lorms. check (or level and squareness. Place reinforcing mesh and other reinlorcement as may be required. Pour, strike and float finish concrete slab Place anchor bolls into slab wilh 3' of thread projecting from slab. Place in 1-3/4" from edge ol slab. V from each corner and vnall opening, then approximately every 4' on center. (See figure 1). Step 3 Frame walls (see iiugres 2.3 & 4). Note the first stud space- •r', each detail to allow 4' sheathing joints to fall on studs. Service door and window place ment should be determined prior to starting to build. (See ligure 5). 0»i 3 • « Toe lai«A« r*9 Plate Te. Arta« e»e«iap at Piatt' Oeta t>ea wa«i tea r.* | Tfaatatf I ■ « •tM Plata I is 1 P 1 aoit* i J s-^' I r ' iTtp cat / ouno , > ^ ♦ v! ^ Peim ae**da a Staata ia>afl.- ^ On. Ftrjure I fOUNOATlOf4 & SLAB LAYOUT Ha>a Tap Ptaia la«a 3-1 3* TaAt-a- ti»e , wra-1 Tap P*aia Ta Ova'iaa tta Pif Oa« 3 t a Tap P*aia lia«|a« twH Ja-^ia w*»ai Nacaata'T Figure 3 TYPICAL SIDE WALL f RAMINQ OM. 3 a 4 Tap Plata I IS Kiiana iapr«aia Ta ABa« Ottriap ol Plata "" Onto tiPt Waa Saa Fig.t Tl 3 • 3 a 13 Maaear ^lai ^t fTrP*«4iI'^• -a* w.aro wusti r tiiaop SKaa'KtMf 0*a« Ci*a t>wP 3-lrt* Ta Anew Co.Mar r<a ta. Saa P"if • a a 4 SAoutPar Sio4 11 4 Pia-cwi Stoa Neia Saa Ptfiara 10 Far Haa4 a«4 4a«iP Tmni OataP Traaiae 3 a 4 •im. Plata Varna Doer a 0 wtta Ma*w. tpara i m i t» b « Figure a END WALL FRAMING (REAR) •Mtiaurf urteta aaMva r Figure 4 END WALL FRAMING (FRONT) |r>e waa Top ^aa S SAaatMna Sai At IS- are*-r3 ■ 4 Crlpalea APaaoH*. I.SatWIaaaor H*. (« O. • 31 a/c f aeA (Trpicail r—T—T—-r— 0aL At IS* arc Mat Varp tluAa race S«#a 3 a 4 SM Plaia ip o. • ri 3 a 4 Criaa*4« Ua4er Sm Ple«# T ■ O, Pa* *iiif • sa«< •* May Varf —I tea Pra-«in if o • • a T***wr^ 3 • 4 Crtaat* I APaaa H». I 3 • 3 • S Dai ” MP* la.o. • S Daa* HP* |R.O • 3*1 3*4 SAa«Ma* SitiAt CacASMatltO i-l/3*| FIfura S TYPICAL OOOn A WINDOW mAMINC figure ( typical corner ASSEMBLY step 4 RAFTERS: Cut birdsmouth and overhang from one end. determine ratter length and cut top angle (see figure 7). • CHECK FIT - Use as a pattern mark and cut balance of rafters. Set ratters at 16" on center. Install rafter ties at 4' on center. (See figure 8). 1 I 8 Rldgtboard^ 2 I 6 Raffpr At 16** o/c Each (Sec Fig. 8 For End Cut Oetailf) 2*4 Gable Endv, Studs At 2' o/c ^ i20' And Wider Uses 2x6 !2 X 4 Ratter Ties At •4* o^c each. (Garages lUnder 20 ) 2x6 Ratter Ties Req'd On Garages 20' And Wider Figure 8 ROOF FRAMING DETAIL TRUSSES: Set trusses at 2' on center and brace. Install lateral braces (see figure 9) and trim tails to 1 Figure 9 ROOF TRUSS (OPTIONAL) step 5 Making certain trusses or rafters are plumb and square, apply roof sheathing. Be sure to stagger end joints at least two rafter or truss spaces. Follow edge and end joint spacing recommendations as stamped on sheathing (see figure 8). Step 6 Install garage door, window and service door accord* ing to manufacturer's directions. Apply soffit and facia (see figure 11). Step 7 Apply garage door jamb, stop and brick mould. (See figure 10). Step 8 Apply roof felt. galv. d • edge and shingles accoroing to manufacturer's directions. Apply soffit and facia (see figure 11). Step 9 Apply siding according to manufacturer's directions. Paint or stain siding, soffit. fac ‘a and doors. Sl.1ing----- Cat. Sheathing Brick Mould 1 I 6 Jamb 1 I 4 Slop 211 4 (Flit) Gable End Stud ------Dbl. Top Platt 12-2 1 12Header ^ Iwilh 1-1/2 Spacer Board Garage Ooor HEAD DETAIL 2 I 4 Slud-1 2 I 4 Shoulder Stud Gaiage Ooor Ell. Sheathing Siding —* Figure 10 JAMB DETAIL 1 I 4 Slop 1 I i Jamb Brick Mould Shingitf» ISf Fell> 7/16 I 4* I r Walerboard Sheathing Galv. 0-Edge 1 I 6 Facia 1/4 AC Plywood Soffit 2 I 2 nailer | Dbl. 2*14 Top Plate 7/16 112- tap Siding 1/2- Intulaled Sheathing 21 4 Pre-cut Stud At 16- o/c Each 1 realed 2 i 4 Btm. Plate Anchor Bollt At 4* o/c Each Figure It TYPICAL WALL SECTION Step 10 Sit back and relax knowing y jur vehicles and beiongings are securely protected by your new MSMAfU> garage and you did-it-yourself!M. ISM KfASltiOTf Tiwt t re n-v ttwt mewtfeM ii Tf^t at tm mtft i rwiitWrH fy 1ft iM» m ciwttnicw# •«••••»•« ttom aWliOlIPl «e SMVWW *•« cimt vmi mst bwvet iK8i*eii Dt«wM rtcMwtt u*et# to centUtfC' new ««'•«« tini»r>ww< mutt ptacMV at iittw '•»« art reioanaibia tor cMiaitM^ an caott wnKti pariar«iwMr>tir co«M»wr*<i« MmAPOO n««t»v atwia«m« an Maanriy «ar any damavti •rrt«^af cawMvwawtiai iwciVaAiai taac*at a* o<fiat»«M wikm aiay rtswH fr^ laMawn'V »>•« yawistri ar« HARMON CONTRACT GLAZING, INC. Major Project Group 9009 Pinehill Lane Suite 200 Houston. TX 77041 713-939-7530 S77>r<ifc G‘iroc,f C-SloUu Prrsb</Tr-rl<i^ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vi O I N To: From: Date: Mayor Grabek 6 Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator June 12, 1990 Subject: #1538 Lauren Born, 1432 Shoreline Drive - Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IA Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 - Lakeshore setback for proposed lakeside deck. Required » 75' Proposed * 34' Variance *41' or 54.6% (review Exhibit L) Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover variance required for proposed deck located within 0-75' setback area. A) 0-75' Setback Area = 9,267 s.f. No Hardcover Allowed Approved Hardcover w/Application #1350 * 1,973 s.f. or 21% (review Exhibit K) Proposed w/Current Application = 2,135.6 s.f. or 23% (review Exhibit L) B) 75-250' Setback Area = 3,929 s.f. Allowed = 982.25 s.f. or 25% Approved Hardcover w/Application #1350 » 628 s.f. or 16% (review Exhibit K) Hardcover Proposed w/Current Application = 735 s.f. or 18.7% (review Exhibit L) Increase in Hardcover = 107 s.f. resulting from Hennepin County DOT request to realign access to property because of safety concerns List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - Exhibit K - Exhibit L - Exhibit M - Exhibit N - Exhibit O - Exhibit P - Application Property Owners List Plat Map Resolution #2552 Floor Plan Approved with Application #1350 Proposed First Floor (Application #1350) Total Floor Plan Scheme (Application #1350) Lakeside Elevations (Application #1350) Street Side Elevations (Application #1350) Former Hardcover (prior to Application #1350) Hardcover Approved with Application #1350 Hardcover Proposed with Application #1538 Hennepin County Department of Transportation Permit Deck Plans Approved with Building Permit Elevations with Building Permit Building Permit/Check Off List i' Zoning File #1538 June 12, 1990 Page 2 of 3 Review of Application - On December of 1989, the applicant received ?• ® lot line rearrangement and variances for a proposed addition to the existing residence. The *^®®%5®®Y^e5?ate°northlot line rearrangement with the property to ^.^®. resulted in approved hardcover In fact, hardco reduced by 6% in both setback areas (refer to E^bits J & K). The applicant now seeks variance approval for a A ?grSu\^rdrnJ^P^?^irwa^s^^s“suV/’in"a\^ T^rFi^e^o^f^?Se SldU?on"'rieafe°;e^?e: ^ExSi^itf f ^'h,"no%i\hVUans approved ri.ke.lli Sick. Tpplicnt ‘■'.t. building issued for a 13x12' deck. Staff has S 5" did include the the deck I th^ cheik list, 3!rnot ?ifl«rihe tddit^ hardcover resulting from the p^posed Seek. The sonlng review failed to into the 75' setback area and the additional hardcover. Please note that this deck has not been constructed. The aoDlicant now proposes a 10'xl2' deck to the rear of existing portion of the structure. Neither elevations or pla JSr t'hV fx^remSTTiS/i^u^rtlV if“f‘■Obtaining :flv«?ois rbmi\^trd -%\«Srru%T£ wi/h ^ ;ir“”tu'rV:lrid%^^^^le ".’ccers ^t^^e ^‘i^-sSoSrjaJd.^^^^t SSp!. Ste7structure from the older section of the residence was proposed with Application #1350 (review Exhibit H). The increase in hardcover within in 75-250' are. would rAs? t“SiriJirM;'e fr.uiv; Vroy-tirifijiway flc\°nlV.m,%T.*S‘oU noj J^sTt^vi f^diSl to be made in approving Nation (^#1350 ) the hardcover in both setback areas. me cutt f t' 7 5-250' increase in the 0-75' setback area of 2% and 2.7% in tne /d setback area. Zoning File #1538 June 12, 1990 Page 3 of 3 Options of Action - A) Denial. Allow a simple step/stair structure to provide access to the lakeshore yard resulting in no more than 16 s.f. additional hardcover within the 0-75' setback area; or B} Approval of a limited deck and access stair structure as building permit was issued to applicant on the basis of an access being provided via a deck and dccess stairs. Llmlthardcover improvement to 60 s.f. - hardcover at 21.9% or less; or C) Approval as proposed by applicant. tin I"’- CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION f f ^ Initial Application Fee $175.00 TrT*" ^ ($50.00 per each additional variance# Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION L ('• ^15 -r% X , •# Pr 1 V Site Address Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) rT TV r-c r-i/niin UJL t t CMCitUc*v;i..;_vr *‘;rrrrrI ^nr'Muw Wi ’ ♦ >T*f iwy vv, ”i.'i ttV J/5.tXJ YOU Uiyo^in 1‘VV.f C-’»i ^•'(}V:4En •• a. r-I .W/. Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name -:P' -P> -) Phone (home) Phone (wor)t) Address:Ij-j'i. ULt^^SjJa. cLtv.jiU ■^ '>^^'2_ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Phone (home) Phone (wor)c) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired (mcnth/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property _Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Uo ^ Describe request in detail: /o X 'i u\ - - - - - - - - VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front _ _ Hardcover Side _ _ Rear) Other HARDSHIP Describ* undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing comoliance with Zoning Code Requirements; _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2, 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Applicatibn Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as irequired. Topograpliic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A ffORKING COPY (ll* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not ^jowpiere if »*H>ve information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ^ • •• “ ^ ** ^ ^ ^ •• ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ •• • •• ^ ^ • mm mm mm a ^m mm ^m ^m ^m mm mm mm . m ^m ^m mm mm mm mm ^m ^m mm APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and corr^^ to—bho^hest of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature ^ o,,,. _ _ _ _ LateY/U^A *^10 IS SIGNATURE ^ The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification ^f this requ A]Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days^efore the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. pit \ o IS ^ M tL • Ui i UIa ec o 3s Ui > J: M CU m M t S M— ^ • 2'^ K» O n ifioe Ui > M QC -4a ^ ^ o rn in>» Ui (Ass '“5-g* “■S2 2<rS I25 lA O OE . O O -J 0 < Ui h- <M s; Ui CM M-i in to 10 Ui at ac CM Q: Ui Ui1 o > > A* S M M •« 10 QC q;mm I D. a mm •< *u CO CO mi^S 10 O 1 “> K O fO 10 Ui in M |5 10 M *T >- 23 CVi — ft0 o UI M Z ni M PO Ui :i!8A* X ^ 10 *i4 1 mm*-• o CM « 2 10 o ft O' O »o in ft Ui in UI z ft Q. M Ui ^ -J S^5 X 3 Z < _ lO K 0 O < IH o N «• > CM >- O O-‘23 -« 0: 0 0-1 0 < Ui ft c^ (M Z O PO CM PH Ui in mJ Ui in to Ui Z Z Z ‘I'gggs X 0 0 Ui Z^ vi ft r •“« Ui Ui O 1 X < -» Z Z 10 h- M (M Ui Ui < to ft ft «M PM_-o3 5ro>- o < m o ^ «j 3 Z CO ft < ft Ui —a A v .< a. \ —^ Ui Ui osss \>• 0 So <o S»- o Ui to Z12*‘sg Ss£ Ui HI < » _ ft K 0. lu wSSS^*" U O >• Ui < U. H> 00 U. Z Z u,--§S — 2 UI H z t-t O < O ft O X P-c Ui Ui p- X -J >2ai S5 = i h- (O Ui ft Ui X Ui u. u. PH ft o O s N O 5! O Ui H <a <3 O ft e a «j 0 < Ui H- ft e^ Al Z UI o PO CM PH in «ji (O 10 Ui in po Ui ft ft z CM ft Ui Ui M 1 0 > > ^ ^ X IH PH Ui Z10 ft ft ft smm I a a e 0 0 ^ ^ Ui UI ^ IM •25555PO o -I -o -• X o Ui o 0 CM CM PO CM 1 K 3 PH 10 10 PH ft -• ft C^ CO << o PO CO ft in CO Ui >• Ui inUi > ~ i««g£ c a = < 0 «• CO 5 W _ Ui ^ Ne & s <^ >- e < < o -> -0 p-p 3 Ui Ui SSaft C -I <0eooo oo X0IH- < 0 2 O 0 CU ft ft C 0a « tt a S S3SS < >• N Ui ft Z 0 fcP Wb Q Z Ui <5 >• N 0 H0 z<5 ft < Ui Q. UI & Z ft < Ui ft ►- H 0 0^x5g22^ CL Ui° 5gS g >- N s- • i»^ ^ * o o ••> - — •**•. • •* -fc ^ «» •*. * ' , .i: . ’. •*> ^p.SV-r- .-•,. . . -^V 7-* -‘^,0 — r — ■• • • •«••.. « . •• *.* »« • • - *'' 7^f2 ^ , • ^ . I • % - 9 »»*••«» » ■ *«r^^— .vc^uJii — •» -»>rr l: CTTV •* OF ORONO- City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.2552 D'' A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1, SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B), AND SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 FILE <1350 WHEREAS, Lauren and Joyce Born (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1420 Shoreline Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: See Exhibit A attached, (hereinafter "the property")? and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to the Municipal Zoning Code to permit the construction of an addition to the existing residence requiring a side setback variance at a 24'8" setback where 30' is required [Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B)], a lakeshore setback variance at 17' where a 75' setback is required (Section 10.22, Subdivision 1], and a hardcover variance for new construction within the 0- 75' setback area resulting in 1,973 s.f. or 21% of hardcover where 2,563 s.f. or 27% hardcover exists and where none is allowed [Section 10.22, Subdivision 2], . , ,NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning Pile #1350. 2. The property is located in the LR—IA Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 2 acres of area. 3. The property consists of 13,196 s.f. or .3 acres. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed the variance application on November 21, 1988, and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: A) The applicants have acquired additional area adjacent to their property in order to enlarge tneir severely limited property. Page 1 of 4 D- ■I : -ft Cll^ J f IrQRONM City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2552 proposed improvement on the property: ones with the 0-75' Reduction of 6% 75-250' Reduction of 6% C) The Mjor addition to the existing structure will nrovld#* no higher elevations of the property to the north. cky^^Vff PlanninI Com^^^ Fioferty^ri' p‘;°cu''ri“r “"‘'it «V do""no';°"a“tV;"|enerMl;®tro^£« no?Vd"ers^*"“-“4'?? ■>l=«ict; that gra,ft'i/g ?he variances wo^?l dLcn«7.^PPli^x^. but ‘^is necessary to alleviltra Of the^Cityf''''^ intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive ’ Plan CONCLOSIONS, ORDER AM) COM)ITIORS grants a vawfno-*^°Y« findings, the Orono City Council hereby Iranting a *1^2- « T7i°?ld«^s"77h Se«i°n 10.23, Subdivision 6 (b T le«io“in°22 setback variance of 58' or In, an^p« lakeshore pritecttd ipt,a"o£ l””Vs"f ""or^firf ‘be 0-75' the existing structure?*s;b3fci'to”th"e^fo!lo“Jg “con*d7tIoL°f*‘' “ for*thi^creatiOT "of °a'’n"ew" curb*^t". """ <^°“"ty Highway Departsient Page 2 of 4 CITY OF ORONO D'> City of ORONO RESOLU !0N OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2552_______ 2 All hardcover scheduled for removal must be removed prior to the final inspection by the Orono Inspection Department for the new construction. 3. Applicants are placed on notice that if the existing privacy fence is to be removed as a result of this construction, that the relocation of the existing fence or any proposal to install a new fence wi^ll require City approval for fence sections located within the 0-/5 lakeshore protected area. 4. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (December 12, 1989). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby a^i^ee to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording or this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 12th day of December, l>y . ATT&STj'-^" " 198 Td»thy;M7^Ja^in, City Clerk Q K Property Owner(s) Page 3 of 4 CITY OF ORONO STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2552__________ I)-*/ ) ss. On this / V day of L^U (V f 198^:'tnrro^ the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. r.-Mv pujml. rl / ^ ^ / /?q. ;7 I > /) . t ^ notary public /(? A ^ 9 MY COMrtisSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this I I day of 198 , before me ^a Notary'^ Public within and for said County, personally appeared and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. mvasnsTSim # r> / ^ ^ NOTARY PUBLIC 'iWP my COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 4 of 4 SteifMa^ t.. ‘«0Bi4C Av- &H»1 rA^ f r I f I } T o p > V J Id 111 Q \\0 w :i 4 -i •: - . •* * w I V i l 0 / h < ./ t d -J id IIIa 40 (d \- V* i rERTIFlCATE Preoarea for PARCEL AREAS 1 Existing parcel area Proposed plus old parcel Remaining area of Lot 2 L0R£N #4^50 8,135 sq. ft 13,196 sq. ft ^jipCO-s^. ft ■:r C^7S' »AS&S «rw Sr ^ ^ ill Not til. RmniiB LEGAL DISCRIPTIONS: EXISTING PARCEL; A Strip of isi.d in Govsrnmsnt Lot ;* Ssctiun II. Tuwnsiup I IT Noctli. Rs^s Z2 Ws»t of ths Fiftli Principsl Nsrldlsn, ssld strip of land having a unifora width of 60.00 fast and boundsd on ths saat by ths shors of Laics MinnstonKa and on tns wsst by ths shors of Hod or Round Laics (so- calisd). Ths northsrly lins of which said 60.00 foot strip of land is dsscrlbsd as followst Boginnln^ at a point 586.34 fast southsaster 1 v oaasursd along a llns whlc.h bsars South 10 East frosi ths ssandsr cornsr of ths .Northsast cornsr of said Govsrnasnt Lot 1; thanes North 67 dsgrsss 48 sinutss Cast a dlstancs of 14.3 fast mocm or lass to ths shors of Laics NinnstonKsi thanes South 67 dsgrsss 48 oinutss Wsst a dlstancs of 207.27 fast sors or lass to ths shors of mid or Round Laics Iso-callsd). Ths southsriy boundary Una of said 60.00 foot atrip bsing a lins parallsl with and 60.00 fast southsrly fro* and nsasursd at a right angis to ths northsrly lins abovs dsscrlbsd land. Excsptlng fro* said abovs dsscrlbsd strip ths public highway crossing said tract ail according to t.hs Unload Statss govsrniisnt survsy thsrsof. Propsrty across road not Includsd In this contract. PROPOSED PARCCLi (Land to bs jddsd to sxisting parcslJ Tht 50Jtti.ajt.rly irn fe.t of t.ot . 3RA.:.'sr'.Y iccorUnj to ttie r.corood pUt CERTIFICATE Preoored for PARCEL AREAS; Existing parcel area Proposed plus old parcel Remaining area of Lot 2 LOREN #4^50 Ccue/i, 7a*- ^ 3 rvjwnslup \\t Norrri, L A /?»LEGAL DK3CRIPTT0WS* EXISTING PARCEL: ^ A strip ot land in Guvsrnasrtt Lot Suction il. Township 11# Norlfi. Ranqs of tha Principal Haridian. aaid atrip of land haviny a unifora width of 60.00 fast and boundad on tna aaat by tha anora of Laaa Mlnnatonaa and on tna waat by tfia ahora of Hud or Round LaR# (ao- callad). Tha northarly llna of which aaid 60.00 foot strip of land ta daacribad as fo^J^*** Bagifining at a point 585.34 feat southaaatcrly aaaaurad along a llna which baara Souih 10 dagraaa East from tha naandar cornar of tha Northaaat c'rnar of said s»ovarnaant Lot l; thanca North 67 dagraaa 48 nlnutas Saat a dlstanca of 14.3 faat »ora or Lasa to tha ahora of -aica Hinnatonna; thanca South 67 dagraaa 48 ainutaa Hast a dlatanca of 207 27 f.at tha ahora of Hud or Round Laica (so-callad). Tha southarly boundary llna of said 60.30 foot atrip bams • 4lna parallal with ind 60.00 faet southarly fro* and maaaurad at a right angla to tha northarly i«na above iascrlbad land. Excepting fro* said above dascrlbad strip tha public highway croa.Ung said tract all according to tha United Statea govarnnant aurvaf thereof. Property serosa road not included in this contract. PWOPOSEP PARCEL I (Land to be added to axiatinq parcel) Th. joutti«.»t«rly fo«t of -ot »loc« :aA:.-;sr'.Y .rroMin^ *.0 trt. r-corJo-J rU«- CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Prepared fori LOREN BORN PARCEL \>1EAS; Existin:g parcel area Proposed plus old parcel Remaining area of Lot 2 * Q,135 sq. ft. * I 3 #196 sq. f t. 13,620 sq . f t. LE:;AL DESCRIHTrONS: EXISTING PARCEL; A see ip of land in k ;o Q i: 1 ^ s-Cuvernment wOt Section 11 Principal Meridian, said strip of land having a east by the shore of Laice Minnetonka and on the cabled). The northerly line of «nich said 60.00 foot strip of land Is described as followst Beffinning at a point 586.84 feet southeasterly neasured alony a line which bears South 10 deqrers East from the neander corner of the Northeast corner of said Governaient Lot 1; thence North 67 det^rees 48 ainutes Eaet i Jistance of 14.3 fett aore or leas to the shore of Laice Mlnnetonita; thence South 67 degrees 48 ainutes West a distance of 207.27 feet more or lese to the shore of Mud or Round LaKe (so-called). The soutlierly boundary line of said 60.00 foot strip being a line parallel with and 60.00 feet southerly froa and neas:?red at a right angle to the northerly line above described land. Excepting froa said above described strip the punllc highway crossing ssid tract all according to the United States government survey thereof. ^ ownsnip^^T North. |(fif^e 23 Weet of the Fifth u.hifors width of 60.Ou feet and bounded on the the shore of Hud or Round Laice (so-west Property across road not Included In this contract. PROPOSED PARCEL; !Land to bo added to existing parcel) The southeasterly ^T.OS feet of Lot 2. BlocK 1. ORASOS'FLY MILL, according to the recorded plat •hereof, ifrnnepin bounty. Minnesota. ^9 wo. :Hr.NIMEPIN COUNT 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 S Permit No. 3 i J. Location Code______ DRIVEWAY OR STREET ENTRANCE PERMIT AND.SPEC^^^ PROVISIONS SPECIAL PROVf^OWS 2 Field inspected by -3V5 Z3ttgrstrc.'n Date 3-a-90 Location 1^7? ghoroHna Speed zone ??A.O.T. Sight distance: Aaual • Left 400^ Minimum - Left Right .Right 350+ 3o0 Curb to be removed to: o Construction Joint □ Sawed Joint ♦ v , ~T* JL»low recamertad .^im'inu.i Recommended drainage: « Surface o Culvert Culvert length_______________ Culvert diameter____ ~^ype of sidewalk: □ Concrete O Bituminous o Cutback required I. CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS (Within Right-of-Way) iMi SURFACE CURB Type_0LljVV;1y Type_IllUir:. Type_J12En Depth 4", Depth “Tl Design SIDEWALK Type_____ Depth____ SHOULDER — Type. __ Depth BLVD ♦ DITCH Topsoil t Depth,• II 2. TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIREMENTS "*1 Ite or ^3 noerJrjij Barricades |1(X) Series) Advance Warning (200-300 Series) s;ed or sod Steady Burn (500) Cones (28'' • Day Clo) S^IALPROVISIONS 0n3 1- a.xl.Tr, Ti n-.,;, r-loc;:!,,, , j'uth .‘iS pr.io"icobl Acrcn co A2V - r'lar"''* •'i’" DO NOT PLACE CONCRETE ON COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CALL "DRIVEWAY PERMITS" M^Si EXtS^^^ Diaerem AI I OiagrtinB "* <..2=2-- »™sw.c.roo.«nT„„„„o« DRIVE.R/W I_______________Eiciiting Roadway Culvert furnished ‘3ate of delivery _ •inal inspection date ____________________ Driveway was found to be □ Satisfactory O Unsatisfactory Inspected by_________________________ Shouldar Ptaca culvart In axistlng ditch DESIGN MAINT. REVIEWED BY DATE APPROVED/tazsifcu; ^-7 y HENNEPIN COUNTY »ORKS^&£ir« By_________^ Fir gcrriHM Date zp-9n p* • - • ^ •• v<*- 't'*"* ♦i* .HENHEMN COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS^ . ftnnit No, 3 ^ / *320 WMiinaMn AvtnutS^h Hopkins, Minntsott 55343 APPLICATION FOR DRIVEWAY OR STREET ENTRANCE PERMIT ...... Num of •ppHctnt ^ (Rtid "Otmral Rtquiramtnti" itvirw lidi) ,A_ » ^ * ■ 0 1 VN • • • I ^ * I TSRvT ttip com 1. CoiilMCliif nwrfnfffiinM MMvk Phono ^0** 2. AppMeotion Is hsfsby mod* lor psrmistkin to constfijct and thorsoftor msintiin: Oriwtwwifis) PuMieStraotfe) 3. lylldin|tobtcowwrwcw<; ° Vas a No o Wtaidanca Q Commareial (tpadfy Typa) 4. Orivasway or stiaat will ba: Q Tamporary Q Parmanant Data proposad antranea will ba naadad: 8. Is tha proparty: Q Platlad □ Unplanad Numbar of prasantdriaaways or antrancas to proparty: A OuiWiniPNmitaeqMirad: a Yn o No City •' f ■ >•■'PwmitNe. 7. Typa of propaaad antranea surfMa. c Htwidnous ^Concwta □ Rock o Otbar. A Looation ___/■r 0. Location, if rural:Mias (Co. nooo) of- 7 IBTiniTwrWJ iCity) TRSoTSfiSSStT ApiMicantli SigwgtMfi •j APPLtCANTBMAQIlAM • (W plot or oonatrwedon plan is not subndttsd). f • / a- P*"' • *-* I I -------- *« • # •♦ •• «»«. r ? V > ir AMT A Mbdw M <s IHSZ CITY OF ORONO BUILDING PLAN REVISrw lMSPE«TOR ^ DATE S'—^e^PERMIT NO. 1 i I .■ □ APPROVED AS SUBMITTED APPROVED WITH CO.RRECTiOMS AS NCTED U MOT APPROVED — CORRECT u RES JBMIT Th«se commentJ jrt for your info.'m.t;irn, Ai: ,vrrV <•->: •,>(. In fui'f ccmriMncff mtn ill ccc)«-cij0ic C» cn* rp* Quircm«nu inciuain': it?ms ro! • .• ; cvi?^r KEEP. THIS PLAN SET ON S.TE AT ALL TIMES- GUA«DR.^ii-S__ 36" M?H. HEI3r;j /!• max. 0?=:N1NoS ; SPECIAL NOTE SEE ATTACKZr SHEET FO R ' CODE REQo:z:- :z;.:v£ j by/ I O’"'/* fc-c: B" MAX. RISER c" ;/.• AI l*i/ ' 0"' L_ V. TREAD TU. % #*• f I • ^ /*•*••*. tc . . ’ * ^ ■ < .<4 '\N — i I ■ i Q \ V^\K! -fOtfTV^ 48^* wm Frost \u®* 2^;r.r5 I " KCKS._MEIJ lM1e All Stnictufs! Wembers fviusi Be Annrove: Wood 0fi Natural Resistance To Oezzy O' Trealed Wood. ^ 0 •* ■•w* • "T •• • ^AaNMVHa j.* t ^ 'T- V.- ■; •• .T- “■ ■••••■• ;.^£ V ' . . '5 vSNOI6IA3« ■■ • ■•" ■■' ■ ' r.^ y, * ; . ♦ .-•*'/ •3XVQ • • r.-'• • .: •• V ... . t-v . Ir .;vv.= : :• ' • ^ :• •• • \ 0S61.-08Z 219 2C snodvaNNiri I AVMHOIH U9l «» « =^- Vrr #4T : • •, f "VT , • ' cu. »^ « •tv** £- ^rt-.::,..- r r/ afcr- ^ .-r - ONi'NOisaa, «9NINNVTdlN3NliH3d J cnvNoa • \ . * ■ •• % • xi3r t fe i- - 0 J 1 • >1 */ • • .-*■ . V- » •v*. 9 ' • • • * k •* ’ .* *.' •• Aft • K' ■ f. • < >■ • v« - JJ; • ■ '4' -ii;h-UUi U w.o ILum ■^ >• ic Oi=no ZLOOu ^ • i CHEw*v OFF hlST. FOR ISSOANCE OF’-ERMITS for OFFICE USE ONLY v ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION:----------------------------------------------- P PIDs description of WORK: ZONING REVIEW BY:,“ tS" BUILDING REVIEW BY: PERMIT ISSUED BY: DATB APPROVED: ^ . .DATE APPROVED: 1-7*^- - DATE: Misc. Fees Calculated By: I V7I V.;ilUllW rn'iMiDAiifM souiifpo uox<v. c:»y5l;il !3.iy. WiiifK*r.uia (6J2J-I73 ;?.5; SITE ADDHlisS:11 • *: I^ IN: n* u • \ '.ni I DESCniPIlOM:nl ii) I IlKi I'im I I I VI!-.. i til Mni:i Ui.i I I fr« !;;*.* ‘ I'ri Mp'n*: f < • Ml- fill. ( i , I y|., •Mil IM riMiini . : • t||» ••it *>I* •lljr./r.MH'l; I ntMii I jon ViJ ' .I V IA :P H: ;.u(? , yfUT: •xo n >V.' IS^\CC • • • i I :r\ ir.^5 Xi Zl\ X -I [if: w!f Aj'I (*3 I f 5^' ; REMARKS: .......... ........... ■< .............. FEE SUMMAhV: li*‘>-;-> r**»' 1‘ivit# r%v>vii' v ->j| cl i n *3 V I I, ^ I I* »'*' VAi u.'ii n.iij M:5)w ri:n f t. I hjo comriAcion: M .1/ l lUI l .fi MM jilt I Hfi <1 / •!•'. >*. me <juor.r<Mf.Nt;i) ii .ivi.i-;v .r. 11.1*11'.jiMii ?• • • ^•1 t.( |f-Jf (» ANll f Ill im ,M I (.'111 J Itj ■••11,|i , •.'r<i;iiio •■.ir'Oii''(iici-;> aiii) •sfaii! i.tc niinii'%r>iii i.'.'ii.Diif. • lMlTvi:tVl.lltNt‘> ■ m All. cjiY or /Oin:i:in;nrs ,c(i>MA.^uuO^<>'W\y Lk AIIIW AIII I I IA.fi|l I I1MI>I 1 HN.sn'',<"nuM Kicomi>CITY OP onoiio niSMmwiiMil SoiiliMf’n MiiKfii; ('iV'.t.ill’n> *»S 1/‘ r:Vir SHE ADORESr.: I'l?."; •iinuif.i.uii miMII lYI’E; I f IiimiIm’I i MU* I:MII (Iiri» AITLIC^AMl : ; .1 i:vci «1 >1 ..•-I. I.|V.».VJ.N j u ♦ '"1 tVn; . • Mir iN‘t N;.'ui A1 iou iiiiv IVn- CU WOMK: I 1 M II I 11 ii’i ;V: 11 1 III. , '.‘i I r.iuit l» At;i)| rinfl iV iM I jori h To;Planning Conunission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Date: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator June 13» 1990 Subject: #1539 David Filkins, 3905 Shoreline Drive Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IC, Single family lakeshore residentialr 1/2 acre minimum lot size Application - Request for setback variances to relocate existing detached garage out of right-of-way onto property. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Pertinent Facts - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Existing Hardcover Survey Hardcover Calculations Applicant's Plan #1 Applicant's Plan #2 Staff Concept Plan 2. 1. This 4,375 s.f. (0.10 acre) lakeshore property contains an existing 957 s.f. house and 244 s.f. 1-car garage. The garage is partially located within the right-of-way. Applicant cannot obtain a mortgage on the property because the garage is in the right-of-wav, hence he proposes to relocate that garage within the property boundaries. 3. Almost the entire lot is within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. Existing 0-75' hardcover is 53%. Hardcover within the property in the 75-250' zone is 89%, although that zone is very small and is covered by bituminous driveway. A number of concrete sidewalk and patio areas can be removed to decrease the impact of the revised garage location. 4. The applicant has suggested two proposed locations for the garage, each of which entails a slightly different set of variances. Staff has sketched a third concept which will also be discussed. Zoning File #1539 June 13, 1990 Page 2 Discussion Applicant's intent is to place the garage within the property boundaries to enable him to sell this currently vacant house. Note that the house sold for $77,000 in 1987, indicating the relatively high value of such a limited property. Applicant's Plan #1 would attach the garage to the right side of the house, extending back from the main wall of the house 16', but no further, in order to preserve an existing window on the house. This location leaves an 8' side setback, approximately 9' setback from the neighbor's garage, and approximately a 4’ setback from the County right-of-way. The garage corner would be about 25' from the curb. With this scheme, there would be additional hardcover necessary within the County right-of-way for a backout apron, and the obvious additional hardcover in the side yard to accomodate the garage. Applicant's Plan #2 would detach the garage approximately 3' from the house, leaving a 5' side lot line setback. This would only leave a 6' setback to the neighbor's detached garage. Setback to the County right-of-way would be approximately 3', with the garage doors approximately 24' from the curbline. Applicant's intent with this Plan would be to meet all building code firewall requirements but eliminate the need to reconstruct roof lines between the house and garage. (Note that in scheme 1, the garage attachment would have left a valley where rain and snow could accumulate, hence a roof rebuild would be necessary to eliminate that valley). The scheme results in slightly more hardcover than Plan #1. Both Plans 1 and 2 leave a very limited access to the garage by necessitating a tight turning radius. Staff's conceptual sketch moves the garage slightly closer to the lake and attaches the garage, eliminating the window of concern, but yielding a slightly more functional garage entry. In any of the proposals, most of the bituminous and concrete between the house and the street would have to remain, rn order to provide a Pickup apron to allow vehicles to enter the County road traveling forward. With all the schemes, there is an opportunity to remove significant areas of concrete hardcover in order to offset the increases caused by placing the garage within the property. Strictly looking within the property boundaries, applicant's Plan II could result in a 290 s.f. net decrease, dropping from 53% to 46%. 1 Zoning File #1539 June 13, 1990 Page 4 S'taff has no strong recommendation for any one of the schemes over another. Planning Commission may wish to have applicant further refine his proposal, or you may wish to give applicant certain parameters in which to finalize his plans. Any recommendation for approval should indicate the percentages of hardcover that will be allowed to remain, and may include requirements for removal of specific items. If the detached garage proposal is approved, the building department would require firewalls as necessary. Isv Zoning File #1539 June 13, 1990 Page 3 remov*L^"to “ld'reIu« haldcov«”^^ The staff conceptual scheme would lower hardcover to 48.1%. hardco;erayttiJg%^^^^ ^f^the'' hoSsrcou^d^L^^l^W^^^ fSS^ b°/:‘eSS aetbac. o, r„V"o ’f exiot^a^h®^®®®*^ require an average lakeshore setback. The 3 shoreline.^ property extend almost to the nn m house and the one to the immediate west are Revenue ^^Mr F^ilkfn®’'® Department of westerly of the t^o? properties, and has sold the r„„ni-i"«f ^*''i®f^‘3iscussion with Dave Zeterstrom of the Hennepin nleasL to he indicated that the County wouI^iS Pleased to have the garage off their right-cf-way, and hooed that aSless® is'^safe" Provide a suitable backup apron so that Staff Reo ndation proposed options has good and bad poi,.Ls the lake^Ire''sttf«*?f'!f required setbacks to lot lines orlake are satisfied, three existing problems are solved: i4ighbor'rgVr%er between existing garage and 2.Removal of garage from County right-of-way. propertyability to obtain a mortgage for the has the Jbl^lVt°v ® ^ ® variance application, the City chanooo ^ require hardcover decreases in exchange for Changes in hardcover on the property. 2*1 CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCB ATT TCATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application V »I,'X \.X I « i PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 3 9 O *S rrrv nc ronxTt UA II ul U*(«WITU OFFICE t .r, iU'fV}I'.'w't'i. V ww Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) p.0 // 7 CiQ 0003 I LLi r Ui.bWi\ 'L'VSfX/ni i ClJ ,-iA VbJt •^Iw'eWVn 4 *72: ;<ELtipr~mss^m' nifY^jO COOl FOl TP: 14 LO/2-V90 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name O A>/. .-I C? Ik. w s Address; .QGWO \kawwsvj OWNER (if different than applicant) Name f V y V\ V t^ Phone (home) V7/L li ?i ___ Phone (work) <-! ~7*V !l _ Zip;_9S3b_S.City: k Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 5*00 0 Describe request in detail: ^VftrjrW, ^ VARIANCES REQUIRED _ Lot Area Lot Width Setback Variances ( Front Other Hardcover V Side Rear) HARDSHIP Describe undue enforcement of hardship or practical^ difficulty resulting zoning regulations r V* A V-P r from si;rict DBSCRIPTIOH OP UNDSDAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form ,2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain V this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center V 348-3271). 3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. 7. As an addendum to this application^ please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 6. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11* X 17” OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that yonr variance application is not: c*^Tlete if the above inforaation has not been includ^. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator^ agrees to pay additional fees (staff payment) and/or consultant expenses on, and certifies that the information est of his/her knowledge. time not covered by original f incurred in review of ^his applic supplied is true and ^.i^rect toQt Afjplicant's Signature '''Date JWIBRS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members r.r purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants ic;.'t be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commlsslor Council. If an applicamit is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, ple<<'^ . .^ke arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and co a..vise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. L i May 23, 1990 Orono Planning Commission; I am applying for a hardship variance due to the fact that Hennepin County widened and improved Shoreline Drive and in doing so encroached unto and through the garage at 3905 Shore line Drive. This has created a hardship because it now clouds the title with their new right-of-way and a new mortgage cannot be placed on the property. The garage, as it is now positioned on Che property, almost touchs the west side lot line and the County's right-of-way. It also makes it dangerous to enter and exit onto Shoreline Drive. I am proposing to attach the garage to the home which would completely solve the title problems connected with the County's right-of-way encroachment and would provide an 8' side setback. It would also create a safer drivewav situation. It would alsom clean up and enhance the overall appearance of the property. Thank you for your consideration. David Filkins I -r o^^o^ t .....••• .•*. ••• 4 ■;^-.•.r.r.. ; (96) ^ (49)21(4)5(47) = ’ “''STSEAlEa' <33 jH 'lP4> 3 o> 7 9 (45)5 (44)~ (43) s iPRpG .(3) 5 HEWiEPI.»J COUNTY (2) :'i?-''-sr.Yvv;:v. ?/rTT /ARK(41/ ** (;|0)?(39) 2 J • •• too » IF 30.?? .V ^90c ^ ymr: *n *tQ.n 5(') ' I •= ,*T ••■ -oec^’»»yin (I) Hi^nnipi tfLirr , - V V c •V* *'l-U i. I ^L- J__________ r r I •€^-r * (7) ..' •••. • (8)>^.-/ ::X ( 12),...'* ..'*'(11). 00c HO 54;6?&3 8 l'(I5)/ < •**««»< « • # -:■■ .;.• (18) Prepared fort CERTIFICATE OF STTBVinv DAVE F ILK I NS y^W«r»Ji linr of ^r.. Z0,T.I|7, R.23 DR. Arntr ♦t UIZ 15-2SO’ 53% ei'/c AM tlint p.iit or l»ol I, niock 0, Towiielte Lniigrloii I’.itk, doRr-rlbnil n*? foMovR} n«?g I lining ^ih n pnlnl iMi tin* Norlh lino of nnlrj Lot t* distant 317.76 foot Wnnt of lln* roriior of said Lot 2* formod by tin* IntnrspctIon of the Wpot^rly line of buiiwoody Avpiuip with thn Southerly linn of tlip County Po.'id nn nhnwn on 1 hr» plat of Raid TowiiBlto; tboncp dofloctlny to llip |pft., flof loci. Ion angle 73 dogreoR, 16 mlnnton a dlstain'o of IH font more or lees to the Bhoin of Lake hi iiih* tonka ; theiire Nor thwenter ly along Raid lake nhore a *llr.tance of 50 feet more or less to a point on salrl lake Rliore on a line deflecting to the left, defleci.lon angle 73 degreeo, 57 minutes from a point on sal«l Northerly line of said Lot 1 dlr.tant 60.60 feet West of the point of beginning; th'*nce Northeasterly almig said line a distance of 57 font more or Iphr to naltl Not th line of said Lot 1; thence Kasl. .ilong the North line of said l.oi 1 a distance of 60.66 feet to point of beginning. AP.LA - 1175 sqnnre fpef to U?6.1 r^ontour line Hoit d hW fr#m 1W.4 tinjiur __^ T ES O • k" Denotes iron monument Denoteo cross chiseled in concrete Denotes existing spot elevation Denotes proixised spot elevation ^---------Denotes surface drainage Dashed contour lines denotes proposed features Solid contour lines denotes existing features « 939.7 9391 Proposed top of foundation elevation = Proposed basement floor elevation = Proposed garage floor elevation = benchmark : I i ALLHMETRO land Iu tM r SURVEYORS 2340 Daniels Sfieef Long Lake, Minnesoto 50356 Ph; 4^5-1433 I Ntraby ctrtify Ihdl Ihl* iurv«y, plan or rtporl iao$ prsporad l/y me or undar my direct supervision and lha! L am a duly negisfered Lund Surveyor under the lawt of the Stale of Minnesota. ._ntr. .n I7PZ&OA I F FILE NO. 90071 A ■ IJ Prepared for UAVe FILjc IHS ^ Horih iinr o f ^r.. ZO. T.IIT, R 23 -shoreline <«»'trclc Wrtlk DR. Ai)i7A //nc oT Lcf / y V 6roer •f UlZ eX>5.r/w6. WAfCbCOi^Cje. UMD C/\LCULPa\0^^o LOME AkF.^AREA 4\‘>\2Zt8 53% 15-Z$0’184 8*)% All that part of hot 1, IJlnck 0, Townplt^ hangrJoii I’atk, Hnnrrlbnd a«; follownt Hoglnnlng at a point on tin* North lino of nald Lot 1» distant .ll?.vr» font Wont or tin* cor nor of said Lot 2* (ormod by tho III toi sort I on of tlio Wostorly lino of Diinwoody Avonne with tho 5>outhoi ly lino o? tho County Road an nhown on I h»* plat of said Townslto; ttionco dorioctlmi to tho |r»ft, deflect I on angle 73 degrees» 1 r> miiiuton a distance of Od feet more or less to the shore of Lake Ml line tonka ; thence Nor th^es ter 1 y along said lake shore a dlst.ance of 50 feet more or less o a point on said lakn shore on a line deflecting to Li,', l-'fl. deflection angle 73 degrees* 57 minutes from a point o: <iald 'lortherly line of said Lot 1 distant h0.f>n te^*t We it of the point of beginning; thonce Nor theaster 1V .ilong said line a distance of 57 feet more or lens to nald North line of said Lot 1; thence East along the North line of said hot I a distance of Ht.hn feet to point of beglhnlng. Iloic AIU'.A ^ ii;5 sepia I o foot to 929.^ contour Hue hW drfet^ b«StJ Trir 11?,4' Cr'dlUf —NOTES •>** Denotes iron monument Denotes cross chiseled in concrete Denotes existing spot elevation Denotes proposed spot elevation ^ ■ Denotes surface dralnar« Dashed contour lines denotes proposed features Solid contour lines denotes existing features K 939.7 93§ Proposed top of foundation elevation Proposed basemen! floor elevation Proposed garage floor elevation = BENCHMARK: J?z 1 ►a tf ALL-METRO LAND SURVEYORS 23^10 Doninls Street Long Lake, Minnesoto 55356 Ph: 475-K33 I hcraby ctrtity that Ihl* survey, plan or rt,;ort was prepared by me or under my direct surervieion and that 1 om a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Atinneso'a. DATE 6////9C?REG. NO.1702^riLE NO. •50071 h I ■ii CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY p,sp„,ed (o,t________PAv/E FiLk:ms North line ti( <MC 20,r.in, r .23 COUNTY ROAD 15 ?t?9.?ELINE DR. Ctntr*r M2 4— il2.7<,— HARD COVER CALCUUTIOHSS ' Oj^ ZONE ZONE MAEOCX>'I eR A kea AREA 4\"i\7218 n'-z^o'104 IW- rtR cmT Of e^Yc A’eio-.^ A ppmca ^^'*"^ ^ I I DESCRIPTION; All thnh p.Tit of l.oh 1, Ml'^ck 0, Townslt*? of l..in<|iliMi iMrk, flnnr r I b^fl ;is I'jllow^: Mr>q Iim i nq ah ti point, on till? Mortli lino of nnid f.ol 1« distnnh .112.70 foot Wont of tlio rornoi of nald l.ot 7, for mod by t.ho Intorsection of the Won.orly lino of Dnnwoody Avonuo with tho Southrrly lino of tho (N)unty Rond an nhown on tho plat of salC Tovnt»ito; thenco dofloctlncj to tho loft, doflectloi anqlo 73 dogreen, 15 minutes a dlntanro of fid foot mhire or less to tfie shore of l,ake Ml nno tonk.a; thenco Northwesterly along said lake sliore a distance of Sn ffot more or lesn to a point on said lake .shore on a line deflecting to the left, doijoctlon angle 7,1 degrees, 57 minutes from a point on said Northorl/ line of said hot I distant. 50.60 feet We.st i>r the point of beginning; thence Northeasterly along said line a distance of 57 feet more or less to said North line of said l.ut i; thnnce East, along the North line of said l.ot l a stand? of 60.60 feet to point of beginning. AREA ■» dl76 ,«*guaro feet »o «79.d rontonr line Woics Trisi ctdjmr NOTES R i? ♦* ► %e *■ y39.7 DenotP*! iron monoii'.etil Denotes cross chiseled in concrete Denotes existing spot elevation Denotes proposed spot elevation 4 Denotes surface drainage Dashed contour lines denotes proposed features Solid contour lines denotes existing features 939 Proposed top of toundolion elevation • Proposed basennen* ♦locr elevotfon = Proposed gorjge floor elevation = BENCHMARK: AXL-METRO T.ATvm SURVEYORS 2340 Doniels Street ong Lake, Minnesoto S5356 Ph; 475-1433 aea. I Dtreby ctrtify Ihdf fhis turveyf plan or rtport was prepared by m§ or und^r my direct supervision and that I am a duty Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the Stole of Minnesota DATE Gjuho HEG NO.1702^ SCALE 1 ''r 20' BOOK 24 T PAGE 26» riLE NO. 90071 A CERTIFICAT E OP SURVEY 0A\/£ FlLk^lNSPrepared fort COUNTY ROAD I5y^ SHD riti ime DR. Arocf , «( icrlZ ZOM6 MAH.oa»ieR ZONE AKEA o-t*.*ZZ\f5 15-ZSO ’10A-ltd- m 0^ WWf4E 53% 8^% LEGAL Di:SCHlPT10N! All tJinL part of lot 1. lUnck R, Townslte of Park, *'’Rrrlb»*^l a*? followRt n»?glnnlnq point on thf? North lino of fiald Lot I, distant 112.70 foot Went of thf* corner of said Lot 2, formed by l-he Intnrsectlon of the Westerly line of Dunwooly Avenue with tlin Southerly line of the County Hoad an shown on the plat of said TownsIte; thence deflecting to the left, deflection angle 73 degrees, ir> minutes a distance of Od feet more or less to the shote of Lake Minnetonka; thence Northwesterly along said lake '-.liore a d I static*? of 'iO feet more or lesn to a point on said ’ake shore on a line deflecting to the left, deflection angle 73 degrees, 57 minutes Cr»>in a point on said Norl.herly line of SJld Lot I distant 00.00 feet West of tlie point of beginning; thence Northeasterly along said line a distance of 57 feet more or ’ess to said North line of said l.ot 1; theiice East along the Noi th line of said Lot I a di.stance of 00.00 feet to point of beginning. AHl'.A « 4375 square feet to 929.4 contour* line llDieS AU bavJ (“r.m c«t|«ur ^ Denotes iron monument Denotes cross chiseled in concrete Denotes existing spot elevation Denotes proposed spot elevotion Denotes surface drainage Doshed contour lines denotes proposed features Solid contour tines denotes existing features X 939.7 <------------ Proposed top of foundation elevation = Proposed bacemen! floor elevation = Proposed garage floor elevation = BENCHMARK: e 1 ►o n ALL^ETRO LAND 1 SURVEYORS 2340 Daniels Street Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Ph; 475-1433 I hireby ctrtify that this survey, plan or report wos prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the Stole of Minnesota. /)■ llditrJ DATE (>lnUo HF.G NO.1702^ SCALE I 20' BOOK 24- page 25> riLE NO. S007I A I Prepared (or: CERTIFICATE OF SfTHVinv PAV/e FILKINS linr oT <^c. ?.0, r.llT, R.23 Coetrde Wnik DR. dtroer •r UI2 Vi ez U & If ►o fc* 53% 8^y( /(f>PUCAA*TS #2. Ml Uiat part of hoL t« Dlcick 0» Townsite of I.nnqdon (*.irK» rlnncrlbed as followss Hcginnlnq ah a poliih on tlif? North line of saitl I,ot I* distant .1I7.7G root Wr»nt of tho cnrnr»r of said I.ot 2, formed by the IntrrsectIon of the Westerly line of Dnnwoody Aventie with the Southerly line Of the County Road as shown on the plat of said TownsItei thence derI nr11 iKj to thn |nft, deflection angle 73 dogrees, I r» minutes a dlstaiife of IM feet more or less to the shore of hake tiinnetonkn; thence Northwesterly along said lake shore a fllstance of 50 feet more or less to a point on said lake shore on a line deflecting to the lef!., flnfinrtloii angle 73 d»*green, 57 minutes from a joint on said Northerly line of said Lot 1 distant f)0.6n feet Wr^st of the point of beginnings tlmnce Northeasterly along said line a distance of 57 feet m m or less to said Not th Hue of said hut 1; thence hast along tlie North llim of said hot 1 a distance of GO.hn feet to point of beg 1 lining ART.A 4175 sguaie feet l.o 979.4 contour line |(oi£o AU firfliuf ^ENERAL NOTES Dnnotos iron rnonumenl Donoloo cioss olilseled in concrele Denotes existing spot elcvotlon Denotes proposed spot elevation ^ Denotes surface drainage Dashed contour lines denotes proposed features Solid contour lines Hpnotes existing features • r X 939.7 93§| Proposed lop of foundation elevotion Proposed basemen! floor elevation Proposed garage floor elevation = tBENCHMARK: _ALLJ«ETllO LAND PURVEYORS — - ■ JIL _ , ... ,j_ , ■, , ,1 _ 23^0 Daniels St.cef Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 f"h: 475-K33 I harehy cartlfy fhtj! fhls turvfy, pion or rtf*'''! was prepared by me or under my direcl surervision and that I am n duly Registered Land Su veyoi under the laws of the Stole of Minnesota _ f,p(5 NO 17025OA1 r _ SCALE 1 "= 20' B00< 21- FWGE 25 riLi NO. ^0071 /\ 4. 4# A A iL ▲ V/JL .u OL JLJI O Jl‘ |w> 4^ 4 */ V Ah X pave: FiLfc^msPrepared foi' _ ^ lir*** of Gfr. ?.o, I.IIT, r.23 C»»'tvclc WalU DR. Cttntr tf 1«I2 4f>pMCAA>TS TV)^ #2_ \IARD COVER C/\LCUL/ST\OH^i ^Ai t; ZOf4C ZOH£BAEO (x»ieg ARE^AREA 1 o’-'ie.’\w.ZZ\3 15-Z50’leA-M- T€R cm*. Of ^3% B'jyc l-ECAl. UESCRlPTlONi All Uinh p.Tit of liOb 1* Dltick 0» Townslte of f.nnqdm. ripncribed c«s folLovst Beginning ah a point; on tin? Mort?* line of ??ald Lot 1* dlshnnh .117.70 root Wont nf tlin cornor of n.ild Lot 2, formod l»y U’.-» III In I spct 1 on of the Wen ter ly line of Di/:iwr)ody Avenue with the Southerly line Of the County Bond nn nhown on the pint of said Townnite; thence deflecting to the left, deflection nngle 73 degreen. If) mlnnton n dintnin'o »)f Rd feet more or less to tlie nliore of hake Minnetonka; thence Northwesterly along nnid lake nhore n dlRtnnce of 30 feet more or less to a point on said lake shore on a line deflecting to Uin left., fief I or 1.1 on angle 73 degrees# 57 minutes from a point on snlil Northerly line of said Lot I distant 00.50 feet West of the point of beginning; tlo’iice Northeasterly along said line a distance of 57 feet mor'^ >r lesn to said Noi th line of said I.ot 1; thence Last along the North line of said Lot i a distance of 50.50 feet to point of beglhnlnq. aim:a 4J75 sguare feet to 929.4 contour line IIOICS ,M\ bd^tJ rr*nt OdNuf _-- NOTES Denotes iron monument OenoleG cioss cliiseled in concrele Denotes existing spot elevation Denotes proposed spot elevation ^--------- Denotes surface drainage Dashed contour lines denotes proposed features Solid contour lines demotes existing features X 939.7 93§) Proposed top of foundation elevation • Proposed basement floor elevation = Proposed garage floor elevation = BENCHMARK: ALL-METRO LAND surveyors 2340 Daniels Street Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Ph: 475-1433 I htreby Cirtify fhul this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and '“hat 1 am a duly Registered Land Surveyor unaer the taws of the Stote of Minnesota. VljtUoiO (>flll‘)0 ncG NO. 17C^Z^DATE ■ FILE NO. •50071 A I CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Prepared for!PAVE F ILK ms WorJfi line of Z0,1.l|7^ ^.23 -^..WELINE Centre le (Vw, »r M2 ----------—— zom BAfLOGoNse ZOf4E A xea AltEA 0-1 *»■2.218 15-250’10A M- rsi c» w>eCT«t 53% 8*)% -STAFF Cot^C^PT LEGAL DESCRiPTlONt All tlint pnrt of Lot I, Block 0, Townslte of LnnqOoii Park, doner Iboc! an followai Bog Inning at point on the North line of said Lot i« distant 317.76 font Went of the corner of said Lot 2, formed by the Intorsect I on of the Westerly line of Diiiiwoody Avenue with the Soutlierly line Of the County no«id an nhown on the plat of nald Towns I te; thence deflecting to the left, deflection angle 73 degrees, 16 mlmiten a distance of Od feet mote or less to the nhote nf Lake Minnetonka; thence Northwesterly along r.ald lake nhore a distance of 50 feet more or less to a point on nald lake shore on a line deflecting to the left, deflection angle 73 degrees, 57 minutes from a point on sal<l Northerly line of said Lot l dl.slant 00.60 feet West of the point of beginning; thence Northeasterly along said line a distance of 57 feet more or lens to said North line of said Lot 1; thence East along the North line of said Lot I a dlntaine nf 6(1.60 feet to point of beg inn I nq APr.A n 1 3 75 sgunre feel to ^79.1 contour line MOltS Ml Artd^ bftuJ frtm m.4'Cfdiiar — o • !•'* Denotes iron monument Denotes cross cliiseled in conciele ^ 939.7 Denotes existing spot elevation [939] Denotes proposed spot elevotion <----------Denotes surface drainage Dashed contour lines denotes proposed features Solid coniour lines denotes ex sting features Proposed top ot foundation elevation = Proposed basement floor elevation = Proposed garage floor elevation benchmark : f? 1>onr ALL-METRO LAND:nsfTrsvic=s SURVEYORS Z5'f0 Daniels Stiret Long Lake, Minnesoto 55356 Vh\ n75-|'t33 I htraby ctrtify thot this aurvty, piqn or riport was praparad by ma or under my direct supffvlsion and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under Ihe lowt of the Stole of Minnesoln. __/A lltUoiO OAIF ^fuloo fjQ \10Z^ SCALE 1 •'= 20’ FILE NO. 90071 A CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY PAV£ FILKmSPrepar'^ri for'. y^" M«rlh line of *MTC. 20,r. in, R.23 ^m^OAD 15 -^ SHORELINE —— “ ---------------0>nae1f curb ***DR. (Vrotr»r biz SThFF COi^C€PT \1ARD COVER CAUCULAT\Ot^^fl zohie 10^ V4Af.OU»l«R ^^l8 reft cuvt 0^ All that part of Lot 1. Dlnck 0, Townelte of l.anqrJoM I’ark, dene r I bed as follows: Ocg inning at point on the North line of said Lot 1# distant 312.75 font Went of tho cornnr of said Lot 2» formed l)y the Intersection of the Westerly line of punwoody Avenue with the Southerly line Of the County Road ns shown on the plat of said Townsitei thence deflecting to the left, deflection angle 73 degrees 15 inimites a fllstanre of feet Tiore or less to the shore of Lake Minnetonkaj thence Northwesterly along said lake shore a distance of 50 feet more or less to a point on said lake shore on a line deflecting to the left, deflection angle 73 degrees# 57 minutes from a point on said Northerly line of said Lot I distant 00.60 feet West of the point of beginning; thence Northeasterly along said line a distance of 57 fent more or less to said North line of said l.ot 1; thence East along the Nnrtli line of said Lot I a distance of GO.GO feet to point of beginning. ^3% AliI'A .. 4 175 s'lu.Tio ff*oL 1.0 929.4 contour line lloiEj AU 4»e«t bowJ Cmoi m-V t»<d*ur NQT£S Denotes iron monument Denuies cioss chiseled in concrete Denotes existing spot elevation Denotes proposed spot elevation Denotes surface drainage Dashed contour lines denotes proposed features Solid contour lines denotes existing features t 939.7mu «------------ Proposed top of foundation elevation Proposed basement floor elevation Proposed garage floor elevation = BENCHMARK: _ALL-METRO LAND I hareby ctrtify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision ond that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the taws of the Stole of Minnesota. OATF OFT. NO SURVEYORS 23^0 Daniols Slicef Long Lake, Minnesoto 55356 Ph: 475-K33 1k e 7 u2 Ionr FILE NO. ^0071 f\ To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson /o From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:June 14, 1990 Subject: #1540 Ronald and Julie Prineas, 1920 Shoreline Drive Renewal Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IA, Single family lakeshore residential, unsewerd, 2 acre Application - Request for renewal of lot width variance granted in 1989 List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Pertinent Facts - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Resolution #2650 1. This is merely a renewal of the variance granted by the City in 1989 for this long and narrow lakeshore lot. 2. Conditions of City Council approval included no variance to required LR-IA setbacks, specifications of the building envelope, and no variance to hardcover requirements. The lot was approved for access via a separate driveway to County Road 15. Discussion Please review the findings and conditions of Resolution #2650, attached. The applicants propose no changes from the original application. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the renewal lot width variance request for Ronald and Julie Prineas, per the findings and conditions outlined within Resolution #2650. Isv — ^ca U4CD ^ , 1 ____M l£ W ILL, L-VMCM f< K S I -X K . ^ CIW 0» OROMO - VKBIWICB APPLICRTIOM U ‘-tTN Q->40 Aft*r-th«-#«ot r«ea (06ubl« ____________ , pv-^^y/ii -----------------——i u-UCH Sit........... ^fri,=fhrSit® *^^p»^** (1 'If r- r------f ----------------- Property i^®ptlflo>tion^ite«r^.'?.P»f «./ ^ •" / II' Attach la^al dascrlptlen to application It not included on raquirad aurvay. ______________------------------—■--• AP^can (hcme)iV£l£lkllii.^ Mama Phono ) ('^o<^ ^7 Addrast .if.U^ no^th- W r<<»v» l^tf tip I,. ORNBft (if,different than applicant) Matne , .Phone (home) _^Pfione (work) fddrasai Zip: ^ (nonth/year)Date Property ^oquiTfed ■ - -- ■ — - ■•''" _ . j, rrry r-r nr/fMI I (d^jl-Xffo not) also own tha adjacent paroels of 1«*'^*________r^/Ayrr nircjrF __----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. ^-T- PRESBMT 08B OP PROPBRW Pretant Zonin9 District Present Use of Property iZEJ^vSo^ipi^tn.-'T-rm'iya,, sl;9iS0 cool svl 714:: Residential 05/24/': other (epeoify) DBSCRZPTIOH OP RSQUUST Estimated construction Coat $— Describe request in L/fPU^ y?' VAIUAIICS8 RBQUZRED Lot Area 8etbac)c Variances (. Other - Lot Width Pronh __ Hardcover Side _ _ _Rear) ^ iVj. 26^0 ^ Ufio, ^7 ^4vj Ccuvy(^ I ZC^t. M A V — 2 3. — 90 PJ C D 9 1 IfS MERRIL-I- LYMCIl fi:C:#-il- “^V R . O ^ #1 undud hardship or praotical difficulty raaultlng from strict anforoamant of aonlng ragulatloftst. . .VAU.— - - -—- - - -— coda tMulgamaneat F- - - - " IB 1. niUD SDBHXmLB SH s%"an'c ‘e“’*ijs? S2« ssi; 34«-3271). 5. Hat Map (obtalnad with oroparty owners list). Certlfloata of aurvay Tar^nad by a llcanaad aurvayor) to includa hardcovar ealettlationa at raqulrad. __ Vopographlo aurvay (axlatlnq and proposed elevations) If any changes f. 7, in existing grade era proposed. Skatehas or plana of flr>or and elevation views. As an addandlua to this application^ plaasa attach a separate list of s. any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. lOD ARB RBQOIRBD CO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGB DOCUMENTS OB A WORBIBO COPY (11* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL OOCDNBMTB SOBHXCCBD. The Applloent end Property Owner m jot sign this application. Please remember that tour ysgUince applleatien_is BOt_ collate —ti22Z£ InfofBtiom has not bean inolnded. L Certification by Clerical Department that variance Application la oomplete. Initialed by Clarloal Stafft __ _ _ Pate APfLXCAIIT*S BZOBACURB ... . .Tha applicant hereby agrata to provide all information required or. requeated by the Sening Administrator^ agrees to pay additional fees (ataff tine not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant axpsnsea incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the Information supplied is true and oorract to the best of his/her Icnowledge. A^lloant'a Signature Date omnats szghasoiib The owner hereby aokowladgas and agreesto this application and further authorises reasonable entry onto the property by City staffr consultants# agents# Comiasion tion and verifl Owner's Signetur applicat __. ___ . City staf lon^M^re# and Council members for purposes of Investiga- t|)is reovest. Data Applicant muet have all eubnltiiAe into the city offices 25 days before the Planning Cooniaaion Meeting. Planning Conunlaaion Meetings are held on the third Monday of eaoh month. Applloants must he present at all eeheduled review SMetings of the Flennlng Coamisalon and Council. If an applloant la unable to attend a aohedoled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorised agent attend in your place and to advise the Building a Boning Office of this change prior to the meeting. I' o $»A ^ <T iH M a. sa.uiac r UI M h O -i u. SS «s UJ SgK CK <L Ui clr M a. I Ui X o O X UJu. M X o a «• CM Ui K» ? CM M I X hk UJ -i X iH I O iH O ? «m o ______Ui hM M O X X < a a M •H n X Ui O O X ill X X M Ui >M O' Xo ui in o X o o o 'T IH m CM I KC:ii-S5 ui Xs t/l »H I o »H O K| O' <0 ^ Kk O if Ui H- M m h-<n < • W M K tn•H tfi o o CM •'SI lO Ui CM X I a a I o »H 9) 3 eo o o X Ui •H X (^ a K> in UJ vnz Z UJ Z = < = « «• M X ^ X<SS5 UJ ^ in K < o rsj o > o % invi<iH Vl < 9 O CM >»■ lO CM I iH I o 9 »n <3 <2 Ml M X X a a n -) o la X m O UI in Uio H 2M 2 X Ui < X »- o rsi <0 >S5 o O 0 01 o K o o o «z u M < X Mo >u-v. ^ 4 O X X Xo a -> -> CM Ui >T X < N> M CM M I X K UI M 2 M I O M O UI O' O 9 X X U U ii Ui Ui X Xo o O' X Kn o ui m Ui Ui < X M O 3 in >• AM O' < M O Z X *H z tH tno Xo in UI “St o >- X < U. M u. z Ui C5X Ui ss M Ui <2 Ui in Ui Ui X > X i- r a Ui u- iu M X o o X K H< XH lu M ►— X Ui o O' 9N CM Ss s fn.oo Xti X o y m o S Xo I:sa > VX < fHo o o ^ M < X Ui X -J^JCC2 in2 X O' < o K> m Ui75 h. X UI ^ «0 ^ UI in M m Ui -j Ui -i Ui Z3'^^CS* ^ o 2 _ < S ac S S >~ S3<^S5 XXo X oS3 > N. ii liii liii H 3< X o Z Ui < > V X < lulllln, n ^ X oo o \r. %c •H C l O O C 4J C <D U s: 0) AJ JD V-» *H Ho 3 :r 2O O u^ c o c u-k 1-^ o: oj x: o 0 tC 4J u > d' 0! r. >1 fw -H «—• C' -H 4J 0-03 O > C ^ 'i-i E-* 3 4J 3 'uo o w c Xi U «-• 0-3 in ml/} % HD - W-. 4J (n -H O C (H QJ ru 0 (D w: - «-• (0 4J t-4 u 4j d c 0 ^ in T x: c AJ r-i cn 3 4J O < 'c u 4J D C U ' Q ^ < IDu 4J in •H cr d ce : IC 4J >1 C rH 3 rc ^ U T X (Ti dc o a4J c m u a c o V U o a tz c B -H ^a 0 d d cc Ti AJDi -Hu U U. ^ C 4J 0 d 4J c d IT C d d in iH o 2 ^ d u- I-I 4J r-- C C^ >, r- o fN Ci- c ^ ^ «H W ^ % u c t: d •h vC d 4J C* r-^ W»cr 4J w O o d cn d u -iH 4J • d ? U ^ Vi o 3 x: fc d z x: AJ 4-' :3 % o >, 3 0 d d d O u) i'’ X > in c tc 4J u ^ L, u 3 cr x: d 4J n c K C *H 'O >• E -r^ C o C ^ 0 S d d U (t i4 ^ % so >1 d t: -M »c 0 d a; c 4J C-4J u X Vj 3 »-• cd d O »*-i s w: cn 4^ u o D-d w w c T-t 4J X C d X; t. c\ o d -H u d d j ^ C--H o z d ^ C '*-1 ^ c c J- > c: 0 4J 3: d c x: % 4^ 4.) U d > d to cn AJ w<> u % C O CQ Z 4J ^ »c u 4J x: 5 end % 4J 4-) 0 (D cL d no c u 44 in c d ^ 4J m E C fO lO Cw x: c »H TJ V. c. Jj 4J ^ d U C d u ^ c d c r t: T E o C U C C D d C d H o X 2 l-i fC Z U) dc ^ >1 o U 4J c i. XI •C 3 c 0 tn 3 O t4 ^ d D«^ x: d ID 4J C C 'D d c 0 X d x: 4J C4 x: otrcn < Cs %<I CN U vO iJ w U X •• < d 9E< x: U Oi aiT □F ORONa City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2650 ________ ! ■ A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23r SUBDIVISION 6(B) PILE #1410 WHEREAS, Ronald and Julie Prineas (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Per Exhibit "A" attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City ® variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, SJbdivision 6(B) to permit the construction of a single family residence on a lot of defined width 30' where a define^ lot width of 200 is normally required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono# Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1410 • 2. The property is located in the LR-IA Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 15, 1989, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings. a) The lot area exceeds the minimum 2.0 dry buildable acre requirement. b) A feasible building envelope exists in addition to primary and alternate drainfield sites which have been tfested and approved for use. Page 1 of 5 City of OROJNO * I CITY I I Ii qronc H RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2650_ _ _ _ _ c) The hardship to the property lies in its extreme narrowness at the point where the defined lot width xs measured. Furthermoref there is no adjacent available for purchase that would increase the defined lot width to the 200' minimum standard. 4. The Hennepin County Department of Public Works has verified that the County will approve a private driveway access onto County Road 15. 5. Although the property contains a feasible building site, that site is limited by narrowness of the lot and by the designated drainfield sites, hence careful site planning will be required in developing the property. Therefore, it is appropriate that a diagram of the building envelope and drainfield sites be filed with this resolution to make future potential buyers of the property aware of the site limitations. 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the healtn, safety and welfare of the community. 7. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic r*onditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or oth?• danger to neighboring property; would not merely “f convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or diffV'* preserve a substantial property right of the applicant, and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. COMCLDSIOMS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Counci hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code ' Subdivision 6(B) to permit the coni'truction of a residence on this lot of defined width 30' where a 200 foot defined lot width is normally required for construction of a single family residence, subject to the following conditions; Page 2 of 5 T1 J City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2650________ Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 26th day of Juner '1989. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 26th day of June, 1989, by James R. Grabek and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. HINNIPIN CO'JNTY My Corarai'SSS10W''^XfIres' Page 4 of 5 City of OROIN O RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 26 50 1. Any proposed residence must meet the required minimum setbacks established for the LP-IA zoning district, and .must further meet the required setbacks from drainfield s*tes. 2. A diagram of the building envelope and approved drainfield sites shall be attached to this resolution as Exhibit "B“, to advise future potential buyers of the property of the building site limitations. 3. Any proposed residence or development of the property shall meet the hardcover requirements of the LR-IA zoning district. 4. No other zoning variances for development of this property will be granted. 5. The approved access for the property is a single driveway at County Road 15. 6. The standard park fee shall be collected by the City at the time a building permit is issued. 7. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application fo'. a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (June 26 , 1990). 8. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 9. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, and hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 5 . . CITY OF ORQNa City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2650 _______ hLCP.)\if\ STATETOF bR t>^ COOI^TY OF -aaWWgligK On this ) SS. day of before me ^Notary Public within and for sa!id county, personally appeared _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his {their) free act and deed. 198J3 NOTARY /PUBLIC „or.R. r;2,-z. * - .......... STATE OF .11 llilBI nil. ) bf\b^ )ss. COUNTY OF H*3WSF5N ) nji MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 198^/ before meOn this ! fJL day of .._ _ _ _ _ _ _. a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared " ' ‘ * to me to " ‘"“JuUiT/UNir P^/Nk'7)^__________ ______ _______________ known to me to be the person (s') "^described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. 'y/Lrtrr-^ NOTARY /UBLIC WOTclY PUBLIC. STATE OF FLCRIDA. MV COMMISSION EXPIRES: CCT.^9. 1991. ■UMSca fHou Mir«Mt ,wai.>c wfcDKa>.aifaas. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 5 of 5 - .'vwp^ < / r;'•;;*^•; *.r.“ •• r‘*^ o in lO (N Oz z < o ►H >-< 13 a ^ M O =: tn >: w U (X in » n 5 a £ o VO c 4J tu £ C O ? 3c ^ c z~ o o *o u ^•p4 c o c lu <-i n e o 0 o ^ u > V o n >1 ID ^ Oi-^ X) a'tj *4 o > C ^ »M E-l 3 x» 3 *0 O O M C Xi U ^ O • 3 B O M «*0 • «u X* B «4 b O O B o 0 o e B - ^ B XI b O U xt -4 o c o •4 BIQ X C XI H B 3 X)o< s *0 IW b XI 3 0 U « O «<O XI «-4 b o axi % B c r-i cm b 7 b 3 XI o *0 O O XI B b U Q .4 >3 0 a ij C7 a o c o o E -4 H4 e; c lu a o ^ o o c te4 ^ ^ C XI o B XI C O e c COa o z C4 o C4 <-4 XI^ o •« o^ >, O' O n b4 c^ b aH B >1 « b o -3 e m e XI b <-i b Cl XI B 0 XI O C C U -4 XI . e j Cl H o o > z c o a z XI b* 2 XI 3 * O N 3 O 0 . o Cl o VI XI b £ > to O 0 XI b o B b 3 cr x: c XI b to c XI C B C C «4 > •3 E -4 0> 0 C ^ 0 £ O 0 b CC B ■J «•. IM » O\D >1 e B • •S*-* >.xl X O 00 ^ C XI &xi u X b 3 b O c «4 O O bl 3 B XI to XI u o a 5 BO c «4 XI 0 C O *3 C 01 Q O -»4 O 0 0 J X o 2d XI O bi b «*4 b C b4 • « 0 0 CO b >, a z c o XI XI s o b4 e M 13 b XI Z 3 3 n O « XI XI O 0 a o VO c u <M m c e < XI m E C cm cB £ O b >3 B a XI XI '4 O b 0 Ou 0 *0 *3 _ b C C 3 O C 01 H O <0 Z b C z a o 6 c 1 o c ii-— ;rvrriir.-=x^- —ft*-.— • <0 I S 4 I «/f t? V* J u •J w I o > tt! 3 i ovnorv 4 c 7 £ I 5 lu^ e a u kl. IA Z) Ui 0-o -4 VyI U) .J I J c3 //. Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson ProBs Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: June 11, 1990 Subject: #1541 Dr. Roby (• Jane Thompson. 1520 Tanglewood Road - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-IB, Single family rural residential, 2 acre, unsewered Application - Request for rear setback variance to construct additions to existing residence List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exnibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Applicants Description of Request Exhibit E - Site Plan Exhibit F - Survey Exhibit G - Constructions Plans Exhibit H - Documentation from 1979 Variance Request Pertinent Facts - 1. The applicants are proposing two small additions to expand existing rooms within the residence. The master bedroom expansion is totally within the rear yard, and a portion of the living area expansion also encroaches. 2. The existing house was granted variances to be constructed less than the required 50' from the rear lot line in 1979. That variance request allowed a rear setback of 20' due to severe site limitations of topography and limited drainfield sites. The house actually was constructed about 26' from the north lot line. The nearest point of the proposed bedroom expansion would be 21.9' from the north lot line. 3. Although not cited by the Planning Commission and Council as a justification for granting the rear setback variance in 1979, the fact that the rear line abuts a DNR woodland may have influenced the variance approval, since we would expect no houses being constructed north of the property. 4. Ti»“ proposed additions do not have any impa*-’. on the existing or future drainfitid sites, and will not increase the use of the septic system. Zoning File #1541 June 11» 1990 Page 2 Discussion Because the original house was not placed as near the north lot line as had been approved, the ° encroach within the 20* setback approved in 1979. The status of the DNR wooods has not changed. Neither addition would appear to have any significant impact on drainage or septic systems. The property s heavily wooded, such that the additions will likely never be seen by any neighboring property owner. Although I had indicated to the ‘^'*a there were significant issues with this f" \?J,Vtedsearch of the files suggests that c^e issues at that tj.me «l®te to the dry buildable area of the lot (which was ®J®*ted in 1978 under the current 2 acre regulations) and the fac v,e*»n property contained significantly more wetlands than had been indicated at the time of subdivision. The wetlands and lot area are not an issue with this application. As of this writing, staff has received no comments from any of the Property owners, ^ncluoing the DNR. Staff Recommendation Please review the hardship and unusual property conditions statements presented by the applicants. This ®^^® ^ constrained by the topography and alternate drainfield site, and the proposed additions are definitely located so as to have the least impact on and be least impacted by the site constraints. If Planning Commission feels the hardships and unique site conditions presented justify the granting of the re^e®tea setback variances, a recommendation for approval would be appropriate. I -> CITY OP 01 OK 3 - VARIAMCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $17S.OO (vSO.OO per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 i (no chanqe^from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application f%«) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 1520 TAi^^LB.VVCon griAp 7 '- i Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 2411 82332 C70I0 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. C2F) :!.C^ 4 9 'f* > Li.'j; .V[.* W. APPLICANT Wawe .SiyRAU Phone (home) Phone (wor)c)_315-303"7 MUU FH KJ C5£K .aSU-SAMKA AKCWI TEcTt* L’MIVEf^SiTT Avyg. 5seL City: M/NJMgAf)>^LJ,-S Zip: jS«S4.l.r. OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) v377-^2.6ft gC£>r 4^JAK)E Phone (wor)c) 62J-7^g.g Address: ^262 a/. LAKE ecvrCitv; MlM.^JF.APnfJ*. Zip: SS^ns Date Property Acquired /O - ( - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) I (do_n^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT OSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District I P> Present Use of Property f-: pan^ i l>T_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ other (specify) _ Residential DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Coat $ A"Ot COO Describe request in detail: p| SA^ig ACT'TACM^ VARIANCES REQUIRED _____ Lot Area Setbac)c Varlant’es (^ Other Lot Width Front _ _ Hardcover Side Rear) HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: Pi £BB DBSCRIPTIOM OF UNDSD3L PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual p*‘Operty conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: f~^-EASg. atTA^&O_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form ^ j 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150 (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. 7. As an addendum to this application^ please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 10 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A HORKING COPY (ll" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not coeiplete if_the—abo^ information has not been includ^. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ D^^e_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correc^ tu th^ best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date - - - - - ONNBRS SIGNATURB The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applic t is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. s9 II•« s u ^ o or m r « ■ 4 M V) ^ <•••»- ,r -i O in rlifs "* g ^ M ly lu M -J M O O O N i SzS »S|sJ M X ^ M iSMS* ^ k*l T g k. S Sp5«--J-ssg R O T T - -I •7 7 *rr #• VI O O L, ^e ^ ^ ^ <«oisisi 2 ra c> ^ «j iO V>1 < < o?iii:5 S3SS|r Q O Q O ^ M ?-=»’ ^/?ji o 1 5 «i a hm ii 3u ii oSfSf cK ly Ml ^ «l ^ 'O O « u U O VA o g _ « Msi'sS' vgsih C Z K 7 S-85 2-,38 = -' S5o8S2 Sa 385^^0 goa“3 •A z u 9 g 1^ •n 3 o a e 3 S2r-.g, 7 3o3fi ~2»5:g ss:isi Ss M " s « ^»sl°S o o g w M < z 5 g lyT <sSa ^ Ml ^ ^ "'2«3o«sii22i a ^ a Ik p|g3 ^ u o > w o s» Sl 3 ^a5g|a S S 0 ^8?“sa -“Msyi Ml M »• Q OK > > C “ U & Z zSlSSgj22-15:7 **5< *s|i-5siSSsi 7 --55 2o95“-*^^ > e gtf) u c z2S.822 5 * 0 Z 1 i |i;l liii i^rl lili t ss§ S|i •A Z VO I 5 ^ Ml C5 S|3 M o 2S " K♦ X 5 S S ii-is*s? li|i s S» H 3 ~a5o|s 7155^,-goojg 2o55*5 giss!! il=i l|ll !• 1520 Tangle wood Road P.1.0 2611823320010 #1 ?-r ylw* -1 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST west face of the house -vhich encroaches on the lequired 50* rear setback HARDSHIP oHhP M o property, almost any addition to the north or west of the existing house would require a variance. When Dr. and Mrs the property they were given a certificate of survey and were not noidied of the variance granted in order to build the house in its current pmJJ^rty lile^* unaware of any limitations related to the north architect. I was aware that we needed to stay 30' away from the point on the west property line at which the site bumps out to the northwest, and designed the westerly addition with this in mind. DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS he house would require a variance. To the south of the existing house. * wetlands below. To the east is the driveway, which cannot be relocated due to this dram field. To the north, as discussed, the house is built within the designated setback area. And to the west, due to the unusual shape of the appearance of space but 90ro of it is in the designated setback area. (See diagram below.) ^ 5T JL }T.i ^ OA, a /r V ' / Lower L«v»l Ftnuh S^hcfluH ! i. 5L5ANK \ AKChirLCT:; c •✓I u «£ s c 2 •= ^ < 2 - 5 C C I 53 u* Ic: :z a O'JW" !3« Oji » 01 luue Stj AI ! \^Llfl\CES 4. 5l<A\ka AKChiTECTS ' I * i!!!'/Vr— ' I ■. t , V' “a i ■! •• I';t' ! r !■ - • -• 09 •■-» ••<ut L.-J e»9^ 0fm» r ^m0^ « V tm -^'1 J '! I ji illk f' -ri fe • I I < -“ “* *-------•*-ja 11 V v<<» J* *9^ iii iiiii Vji' ff0fCJ9i0i90 ..,•: .. ..,,, *,j li i.-i • *rr« M^w 00^ ^^rf0»09 •2<4 »% < 0mr 409 .^Ski ^ es U Ci fl1^ 2 -2 < K 1 ^ *® 2 ' O c JE « =a C I fiS C i Diawm ^ Qiig o< ltm« /><■«»* y /«>^ |: . n ■ wtf 0mm ■ *mm. Not NOTOT M im»ax s, •mmotnmi ■ n mf W ■ «•««*•»• M &A1 . «i w M4 OTMM i« ■«»«• «tn rwi» BASCUENT PUN K'‘ p t M1N17TES OF A PI-\wnNC COMMISSION MEETING HELD OH APRIL 2, 1979 Pag* 4 It was stated that If the garage was constructed only 3' from the property line a one-hour firewall would have to be constructed and the construction cost would Increase greatly. In further discussion, Mr. Anmerman was asked If he would be willing to place the garage 5* from the property line and he agreed that would be acceptable. Hannah moved to approve the variance application for a 5* side yard setback contingent on the exterior storage code being reviewed before Issuance of the building permit and at final Inspection compliance with the zoning code requirements for exterif-. storage. Motion seconded by Adams. Vote: .yes C7), Nays <0). Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Rennebobm and his contractor, Mr. Hlrsch, were prereic. I**' property Is part of the Lawrence Plat vrkch was approved In April, 1978. No problems with wetlands were noted at tlMt time, however, the wetlands are quite extensive. The original reqjest was for a 20' variance to the rear setback, but staff Is now requesting a 30' var-.ance so as not to Interfere with the alternate dralnfleld. Hjrr moved to approve the 30' variance request to a 20* rear setback considering the primary and alternate dralnfleld locations but expressing concern for the lack of two acres dry bulldable land. Motion seconded by Hannah. .*ote: Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion passed unanimously. THOMAS AMSmMIl 3458 North Shore Or. VARIANCE #468 (Cont.) ..» PETER REMNEBORN 1520 Tanglcwood Rd. VARIANCE #470 ADJOURNMENT if s 1I >-'*•0 I'SE PANNING KFEPARED FOR: i APPUCATION REVIE>fED BY: SPECIAL COMMENTS STAFf\RECOMMENDATlON \ • (pvllotlaB •• ^'^wrw%'mr ** *- - -. rr.^>- ‘•'..-•.•rAP .Mr.triNG or thc opono council, appil 24, 1979 Thp Chairr.in v.int<*d to note for the Council thet it w.^s the con^ennua of the majority that the proposed project is more esthetic and functional than existing situation. Dissenting vote, McDonald. Could not approve the application because it involved grading and filling within 75' of laKoshore and the cerrent slab noted in memo in reality Is a cement seawall. Abse.ition, Hurr. Conditional use permit is part project (marina license applica..c still pending. Council Meetlno - April 24, 1979 • .araii -hat is Page 16 COTIDXTIONAL USB PCPM 1444 Shoreline Drive (Continued) Mayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to approve the conditional use permit request of Windward Marine, 1444 Shoreline Drive, per the Planning Connission recommendations and subject to approval of the City Fnginrer. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Mayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to approve the variance request of Thomas Anmerman, 3459 North Shore Drive, per the Planning Commission reconnenda- tions of April 2, 1979, subject to a five foot sldeyard setback on the northeast per Exhibit 9, and exterior storage to be placed into new garace. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). VAPIANCE 3458 North Shor« Oriv 1468 Thomas Anmemsn Butler moved, Hurr seconded, to approve tTerequest for a variance of Peter H. Rennebohra, 1520 Tanglewood Road, per the Planning Commission recommendations of a 30* variance (for 20 ft.rear setback) finding hard ship of topography and limited drainfiald nits subject to septic system and well location per septic Inspector's recommendations and no building pomits until the Tanglewood Road construction standards provide permanent all weather access. ftotion. Ayes (4) - Nays (0). VARIAHCS 1522_Xanglswood<=miRennebohn Butler moved, Paurus seconded, to adopt Resolution '1026, A Resolution Approving Conditional Use Permit Tor Limited Church Service Use Of The Navarre Drive-In Theater Property, 1979. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). RESOLUTION 11026 (kx>d Shepherd Church ■g i'v :nc varmnci : AiTLiovriuN cm OF ORONO » n i»» *t, rrrai«t »•». ritti r*i< 1^* •aioK** iKfarwitM CmvI»i« Ii»m I • II (Tr|.* or Ntoi). If o«>4»4, •■■•rlk t>ii«r or •tl<«r loforMtloo la krilar «>«rtl»o T«oar toaoort. loor^Utr •ralWoiloo* vtll o«t ko ••••*1*4, , * . . •4 V*" PROPERTY ADDRESS ^ ^ alKcko^ ta> 4-/i■ rill ) €. Ur <JCt -J P..J Ut«l ^aorrlrllm •*>•11 •' APPLICANT »/ /! K^tjc u- fw. -yrr /V /.-r .v.rc* fjirf•«IMo( A44to«t If ••*r. ooaUU 3. OWNER y;^fk t *44r»»* Date Property^Acqulred__Ji/lZ-------------- ---------- - , , ^ I (do) Cdo notr«lso own other adjacent parcels of land AGENT ------i-----------------------------------* -------------------- (MOTtk/TMr) «a«T*«k 5. 6. 7. 8. V./NOTICES »•! k^kllraot - (ko*«» PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT P R. ' f S LIST OF EXHIBITS • _ ♦ _ >• ^ »> — PRESENT USE u.i4«.ui U«4 1/ »»MM _ DESCRIBE REQUEST ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION CXJST $_________________ _ ••Ikkllkk M» ••• _ tMlImM M ■aUllAt <»• ^ Mia MW ^ M M ^ mmSbI __ M>toM Describe request In derail: /‘r^o.-rr {•*^i^rrc~Tc a->ea^ Ar — 9. .V <.//*> * «. f".^ C,‘ /r (*fcjrA. ^ ^ /»Var4y^a/ VARLANCE(S) REQUIRED «• a. i*- t.,...i.a u.f%i _ t»( *rM ___ U« *ia«fc __ ^ (atkack t »»Mt __ Sia* aMT) ffcka* Describe UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS »-*kM«ua k-aiikM.-tis t-tae ^ 7r Kr',n .-T." ntruf 7/. H^.fc 77r_j<f^*^ i'r f l €~^- / •/Vafr >a r> ' (‘AC <Vcra>-kf t>? >? T ^ e-rt S\fmr% ,. ,-/• rif. ■ x«/r.. . rf>/xr K ejr/o ><■.- /♦*/> 11.Describe UNDUE HARDSHIP or PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY klllM tTM ktalak aal at *r Malac raiwl****** 7^^ /> r/4- *7 /cy» • /•r e"r /^/4^ /'/rr /Vr-* cr~ ^ tk-^A. a. , 7/# .Sk»^T MrrA^m, A .. afTj / *</ ^ <»«4< 12. Describe EFFECT OF PROPOSED WORK — aau»Mrut MMttiaw a«a — o>a MfkkaHiMa u i».aakit • 1. *• /•/ > e -r ^~^/-rr «»■• ■». 'V fA*9r»^ii rr~2* r ^ *ii > 4««ee/l/ 4*«.«a>a'4> /?V ^AJ The APPLICANT and the PROPERTY OWNER ffluat algn and date thl« application. T>>a amjcaer fcarakr arraaa I* ar«al«a all UfarM'lM tka CW*H karakr aaknaarlaatM aM afraaa t« tftia aM<lMtl« taaalta4 ar raaaaaia4 ka Ika Iaa|a| kWalalf Iral.i , a|T«ak a«4 far Ikaa avlfwalaat raatMikla ■airr MM IM rraMtty «a M* all f*«a a.k'ar <awaMl aapanaaa Iaaarra4 In raalM tf Clrr aiaff. aM>a«l|raia, a(a*tt, aaaalaalan MB*aTa. af tkla aaallratiM. a.^ aartlflaa tKat Ika UrarvatlaH a>4 toMall a^AaM faa *MVMaa af ti>*aa11|a '* .vaallaa I. trva a»4 raraaal ra laa k.tf af kta k»Mi|aa(a' aarlllaailM af tklt raaaaat: To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Prom: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: June 14, 1990 Subject: #1543 Richard Reed, 1000 Old Long Lake Road ~ After-the-fact Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-IB Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (C) - Monuments in excess of allowed 3 H' in height require height variance approval. Allowed » 3 Proposed “ 5' Variance ■ 1 List of Exhibits or 43% Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Photos of Stone Pillar Exhibit E - Certificate of Survey Review of Application - In the summer of 1909 the Public Works Department noted the construction of a pillar on the subject property that appeared to be in the 66* right-of-way of Old Long Lake Road. Old Long Lake Road is not a platted dedicated road. 10' of the traveled road encroaches the F.eed property. The zoning staff was asked to flag the property with a Stop Work Order so that the matter could be resolved. It was the Public Works Director's original position that although Old Long Lake Road encroached the property that through a perscriptive easement based on the number of years the road had existed and had been maintained by the City, that the City could lay claim to the traveled road in addition to additional right-of-way required for maintenance purposes. The Public Works Director asked for further review by the City Attorney's office. The Attorney advised that the property is torrens and that the City had no legal claim to the road via a perscriptive easement and at the most, the City could claim an interest in the 10' of traveled road that intersects the property and additional right-of-wa/ for purposes of maintenance. In recent discussions with the Public Works Director, he has asked that the pillars be no closer than 10' to the traveled road. Zoning File #1543 June 14, 1990 Page 2 of 2 The applicant proposes the installation of four pillars to be installed at the entrances of each curb cut (review Exhibit E). The pillars will be approximately 5' high and 2'3"x2'3" square. The existing pillar has been placed 10* off the traveled road. Upon an inspection of the site, the pillars would appear to create no hazard to the public who use the roadway as they are positioned behind mature, natural screening. Unfortunately staff is unable to locate plan drawings referenced by applicant in his previous correspondence with the Public Works Director, but we have been able to locate the photographs and the survey. Mr. Reed has since advised that he had no formal plan drawings but will provide elevations at our meeting. Options of Action - A) Denial. If denied, please refer to the necessary findings within the variance sections of the code; or B) Approval, allowing the pillars to be installed at the entrance of each drive to be placed at a minimum of 10* from the traveled roadway for Old Long Lake Read. CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) jj. ft 1E43 PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 1000 Old lonn 1.3'ko Rcxid, Wavzata, 55391 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 35-1 !8-l 3-0003 LUr ut LujtO P i/vivi i lFFICE i3i^:cvCvo acl 3 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. * APPLICANT Name Richatd C. Rood Phone (home)47:-S0s9 Phone (wor)c) 338-5819 Address; 1000 Old long l^kg Road OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ _ _ City ;'.Vav;/>ta, Phone (home) Zip: 55391 Phone (wor)c) Address:City:.Zip:. Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT OSB O? PROPERTY Present Zoning District Residential Present Use of Property Horostoad Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 500.00 Describe request in detail: TO allov split-stone nillar to be built at a height of 60 inches. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ VARIANCES REQUIRED _ _ _ Lot Area _ _ _ Lot Width Setback Variances (_ _ _ Front _ _ Hardcover Side _ _ _ Rear) Other To allow split-stcne pillar to be built at a height of 60 inches. HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; N’ono._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP ONUSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements; N’ono._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ RBQOIRBO SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persona you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. YOU ARE RBQOIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCDNENTS OR A NORKING COPY (11* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCOMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above infonsation has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to .the best of hiS/^h^r knowledge. Applicant's Signature ww y a W. ^ / Date < 0 ONNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultant?, agents. Commission members, and Council membepf for purposes of investiga tion and verification of thi^ request. Owner's Signature Date -7 c> Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unal^e to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ■ «\ V . ; v'.<' t '^fear ■ ■i- ^ ^ IP»^ S--"^.'.% V.s /■I ^ v/^^rv:;^ '•«. •' \*-V 1* K£a |S >.-. ' V .v' ^ • V ' '^fe y . ■ .......-.:.r;,-;->-^..:.,. ,,.-.^-. I^S. : ■ -^ wip ^ J ..V-' ■ U‘- V^.v ^.•:-v....... .»V. ^ ' --. \ Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson /3 From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning t Zoning Administrator Date: June 14, 1990 Subject: 11544 Roger & Becky Berry, 1392 Baldur Park Road Renewal Variance/Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning District - LP.-IC, Single family lakeshore residential, sewered, 1/2 acre Application - Application request for renewal of variances and conditional use permit granted in 1989 List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Resolution #2587 with Approved Site Plan Pertinent Pacts - $ 1. In 1989, the applicants were grant»*.^ .* erage lakeshore setback variance, hardcover varia.’cja, and variances for grading within 75* of the lake. Applicants are requesting renewal of these variances and conditional use permit. 2. Applicants propose the same footprint and site plan, but note that the house may end up decreasing in size. Applicants have not provided a revised set of plans. Discussion Please review the findings and conditions of Resolution #2587, attached. The conditions regarding hardcover and grading on the property are quite detailed, and Planning Commission may recall that the originally proposed excavation to create a walkout, was denied. The final approved site plan is attached as Exhibit A of the Resolution. Staff Rea<sodation Staff would recommend approval of the requested variances ai.d conditional use permit per the conditions as stated in Resolution #2587. CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee §175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address / Aafclur /^. ficL #1D44 1 cm f ii:iUi:n-jr»iK.tsi Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Phone (home) ^7/' Name ]^o<jrr ** Phone (wor)c)_________________ Address; Jk2?c^ /^/c/ur /?/ City; (^rc>r>o Zip; S^3fl OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)_________________ Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Phone (work)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Address; __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ City;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Zip:- - - - - - - Date Property Acquired _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _(month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT OSB OF PROPERTY Present Zoning Distxj.ct __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Use of Property _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Residential _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Other (specify) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ COG Describe request in detail; f?trrrZM/s/ VARIANCES REQUIRED _ _ _ Lot Area _ _ _ Lot Width \/^Hardcover Setback Variances ( Front/Wff^^ Side _ _ _ Rear) Other _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _—————- - - -— HARDSBIPDescribe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP ONDSDAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: REQUIRED SOBMITTAiS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 340-3271). _ , 3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover crlcuTations as required. 5. '^’opographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. YOD ARB RBQOIRBD TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR_ _ A WORKING COPY (ll" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete_if the above information has not been includ^. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE , ^ ^ j »The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that^ the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowle'"ge. Applicant's Signature — Date -/ff^ ONNERS SIGNATURE _ , j u ..The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Appllcint’must’hive all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission «re held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. JO NO IT? 50 NO“2r8~ \ #lu44 I City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2587__________ A RBSOLtmON GRANTHIG VARXAHCES TO municipal zoning CODB section 10.22» subdivisions 1 & 2» JSd SECTIW io.55, SUBDIVISION 8, and GRANTING A CONDITIONA^SE PE^T PER SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 PILE NO. 1363 HHBRBAS, Roger ( sVlVur 7erk*load the «t%°oroVono°"(he"4inI?te7*Citr and legally described as follows: I.ot. 17 and 18, Block 1, Balder Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has the^elfis^ing to permit the construction Afna a variance to Municipal Zoning Code residence on the property, requiring a ent past the average Section 10.22, Subdi vision 1 * w is normally allowed, and alakeshor. »«t oack line -here no enc„ac_^^^^^^^ h/rdcover in the variance to Section , -xcess of the hardcover normallysoutherly 0-75' and in the tone in excess o -n Municipai fifh'/n'^V^" ?4V"!rkVsh«e%'lthl=k%one" -Sere no grading is normally allowed. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Ciiy Co«..cil of FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File *1363. 2. The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshor. Residential Zoning District. 3. The property is approximately 0.71 acres in area. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed t^is a^^^^ ® conditional use permit based on the following findings. Page 1 of 6 N < >► r a g*6S 9 m o ? B n ► "20 o s » os «- 9 ^ n m 3 o M •“ • S W C O » 8g^5?5 - X 5 " n * g 5?»SS.=ss?=Si'5S|iis: ?aPSaSi^ ^ Z 9 ^ *4 o 6 < M"jssissto* < 9 n m VI irt o 9 n 2 oS 5 ^ S S g * 2 * r- 2 C 5 OSfsi"" ? 2225S^=s-=^gi: 5 5' VI vt S ^ b) ^ o > C • to* m ti w* !*••-■ Z 9 b1 ^ m 2 ^ S g ^ toi n 2 to* < 9 ^ |i?i « ► 9 i S S on- ^ssssss f o o ^ 9 W1 O ► ^ ^ v« ijlii*! S|2**g4 > X ^ 'll VI to* ? b1 9 9 to* K » g b1 VI S?eg Z Z Cl o bl ^ i Z ^ U U O VI liiSi- S 2 9 * ? 3 Z 99 M W 2 VI VI » 9 9 9 VI 9 VI to* 9 fto 9 ^ -s Zig S "8 = liP IIPs 5 ■ * I'li m°°f -*9 0 9»?ia i *SiiSS? to* to* Q toj '2^*582" "SS Sg 5 " ia 5r5|2s ;^;!aS!C 5,^^-^8 51SJ2r 9*. *1-S5 • 9 Is b8 ► S 2 Sg”lss W X » n n e w 5S25S* 5s®?3go•4 9 m n 9 » » bl M 1 2|"S?m m o toj 9 9 0 0*'^ SS 9 9 S lg g2 ^ « 9 9 V« K*'22# M 9 » «/t Is *§22lr o a o to* 9 r- r- 2 VI VI 9 in m 9 53**92 'S l| S'* I ? * 2 ? :h: M P |3 SS22SS S ^ 8 S S 25SS»S o to# n n o VIS X *- 9 to* » » #^^990 XSSXSS8^ o O to* r- O i» o 1* f r- V*i=i:=» ^ 2 - ^ - §fe55 ?52*3 ? *’i=s?'-’8i.9b5 9 '■* '*1 ► ^**19^ 1 9 < to* §^,•-•-85VI ^ » X Z o 1 VI O f- 9 to# to* 2 ? 9 9 VI ^ to*-c > c f f- g o*2§l s ^si- * *is 85to* *Ss5S “ " la !t 8* 92S"i “s«n:s= "®si*i S-'S- So 2#i o *< #15 4 4 Si S •Ia City of OROiVO RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL NO. IS87_________ A) Hardcover is bein? totally removed ^^om the northerly 0-75J B) The hardcover increase in. the tone 31 »% is justified by removals in the 0-75 tone, which yie ?hictiL^ from e.e% io 0% hardcover in th* northerly 0-«'^tone^ All of the procosed hardcover is necessary -op . e-uie substantial proFerty rights of the owners in developing this property. C) The averaoe lakeshore setback encroachment oi 2* is encroachment of the proposed house past ;^e on thi is necessary to preserve property without redesicning the proposed residence. ^ m "'he va-'ances recuested are consistent with variances granted fir upgrade oritSL* residences in the Baldur Park neighborhood in recent years. E) The unique elevated nature of the property in relation the surroundrig properties, suggests that ”road inlocated near the highest elevation and further from ^oad i o-der to benefit from the northerly view of the therefore requires a longer driveway with its assoc.ated hardcover. F) Granting of the conditional “*®. grading in the 0-75* zone is necessary to house is in the excavation that will remain after the removed, with a blending in of the ^heir walkout The applicants have revised the house orades fromconcec- can be developed without the need to change grades rrom those naturally occuring in reconVtruct the lr“i“vtw*aV=i« n’l«s%°a"r'y t”o%"r%%?I ‘1.%!5e7nV I'ot-hardcovar aces to the property. Page 2 of 6 \^9 I T 1 OF [ ORONC^ City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. :S87__________ 5. The City Council property are peculiar ^ ^^at c'-anting the variances would property in this zoning li^ nor pose a fire not adversely ®property^ would not merely serve hazard or other ^is necessary to alleviate a 5ln,*cn‘=s%7.\\V\" rsh\‘T nil^rrnd^nVen; Vi code end Conprehensive Pl.n of the City. 6. The City jS*:h|7r;1"Ve%irht« VeVbaV* «nVwill ;o\^V'eVV%?ISInn? Vo ‘th:>«lth, seiety iLl"/. public, would ®JCQ^fno*-T-operties, nor will it depreciatebr other danger to "«\9hbo.ing^.ope ^ l^vel of use of the surrounding property v.iues^d th^ objectives of the property will be in Keeping wi^.. C'-v. Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan -f the C... CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or Nore Council hereby grants a variance to Munic ^ average lakeshore subdivision 1 to normally allowed, and grants a setback zone ®”®^° j? r j *o allow hardcover of 25.1% in the variance to Section 10.22, . -one"where no hardcover is normally southerly 0-75' lakeshore .V^^^he 7^ setback zone where only allowed, and allow 31.91 harocoveri grants a variance to Municipal 25% hardcover is normally * o «Vd a conditional use permit perZoning Code Section 10.55, Su^bdivision 8 regrading of Municipal cod® ^ zone where filling and ^r\*d/“ls“o*;;4A"y ^t “ll” ed^Vubj.ct tc the funcwlh, conditions. 1. construction sh.ll adhere to the site plan attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Page 3 of 6 i ^ I OF I ORONC^ City of 0R0>0 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ^557___________ 2. All hardcover In ;“V\“^^-?5”’la\*Mhole* *°shVll''bo 31.9% or 4,940 s.f. Ji ’*.**vVd. and a nhird garaoe rtall shall b. :^”=h."d'’'« rh‘; ^rofoaed residence per rhe site flan, Exhibr-^ . 3. per applicants revised 'I** ?5. rone ISall .\°e remold r«"ence "^ach toexcavation remaining from ^ne remo «ioce of the pre-exiSwing grades «'>'«fcu®*»’'ifthe *0-75 ’Vetbkck tone have been approved -or "iniSli a-SafScut.^" Ih:"|t4er\°y"s ‘h.?i‘"be 'subject to erosion control measures as m . T-irapp u'cirrs’ advisea that no^ *^«i/^/-,Aed“??h''th ’e cuUen? the current variance apFroval). ^ 6. Authorities granted by th ■ ‘be^x^^^se^ by --li-atirVor ‘ ,.^i!ii"s r^U-tio^n-^ill rxp “;?e^n"^ISa%^“d«.“(M«ch*!r 1090). 7 violation of or non-compliance *f®nVf”the toning Code, Lfl“ruroma:^VllVb\*tiin=^ ^ be punishable as a misdemear.cr. Pace 4 6 19»^. Citv of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 258~___ _ _ _ _ _ 8. The undersigned owner he. hlifs! *d=poed by rhe Orono City Council on this 13th d.y of March, STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foreooing instrument was R.^Grabek & day of 1^] Ai^Ch4----------------—-j, r■* tv of Orono» a MinnesotaSj.!l”5isS7SSSp: «>■*< •' "• ^..... K J.e,//fn---- No'tary PviW*®^JT^HtFrlir• — 'V LAURIE K<- * •'r- *j HlNNtPiN CC^^^rr . ^ * ________..A Mtiwirir. V— Me ■-'* ^ ' MV Commission Expires Page 5 of 6 City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2587__________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) On this ) ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) day of n^riyr-A before me e Rosarv>^ublic wlrhln and for said county, personally ^ fZp ______________________known to .•ne to be the person (s) described in a.id who executec the foregoingappeared instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. ’■aSwSwjsii’ig. T NCTAP.Y PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXrI.RES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. cou :;ty of mennepii: ) on this 30-*A cay of Din ______. iS6?, before me a Notary PubUc within and for said County, personally appealed Hp^pfi Kpi A/lJ ___________ known to me to be the person (^^%escri^^ in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executec the same as h*s (their) free act and deed. THeaesA l naabMOTAirr puBuo . uiM<£sorA ____HENNEPIN COUNTY Mr ownwinMBw amairM M-t? NOTAP.Y PUBLIC MY CC.'^LMISSION EXPIRES Page 6 of 6 City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. >587__________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this _______ day of ............__________________ - before me a Notary^ublic within and for said county, personally appeared A. nothe person(s) describe^' ir. and who exeHTTtec the .oreoo.ng instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. fYlri.roA NCTAF.V PUBLIC ____________ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. me COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) rm ^.his 30tb da> of fy\n vVA 1S8?! before a Nextary PubUc within and for said County, personally appeared H,?nl/n known to me to be the person(s)^Mescribeyin and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act ana deed. NCTA.PY PUBLIC TMCneSA L MAAB MOTAMr P\J*UO . UilMesOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY W)f »«wwBnn mt>rm M-17 MY OOM.MISSION EMPIRES Page 6 of 6 Planning Conunission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardaon Promt Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator Datet June 11# 1990 Subject: #1545 Dain 6 Janet Rodwell# 258 Cygnet Place Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-IB# single family rural residential# 2 acre# unsewered Application - Bequest for side setback variance to construct 3- season porch List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Construction Plans Exhibit P - Air Photo Pertinent Pacts - 1. Applicants propose to construct a 3-season perch to replace their existing open deck. Because this lot is triangular in shape# the south lot line is technically a side lot line for setback purposes. The required side setback would be 30' where the deck is proposed to be 21.2* ^’'om the line. 2.The neighboring adjacent residence from the proposed screened porch, functions as the neighbors rear yard. .imately 130' ... ad jacent yard 3.Lot area is about 28#600 square feet or two-thirds of an acre. Lot coverage including the proposed screened porch will be 7%. The screi.-'ed porch will not conflict with existing or potential sept*- systems. Discussion This lot was platted in 1959 at a time when the minimum lot size for this area was 25#000 square feet. -xistino was constructed in 1971 under the R-IC zone# which required a minimum of 1 acre. The required side setback at that time was Zoning File 11545 June 11» 1990 Page 2 10'. In 1975 the area was rezoned to RR-IB, 2 acre oinimuro, with a 30* required side setback. The proposed addition, while encroaching into the required setback, will maintain a significant distance from the neighboring residence, and will be above the existing deck area. At the proposed single story height, the screened porch should not significantly affect open space in the neighborhood. Staff has received no comments from any neighboring property owners. Based on the sketched-in building envelope on the survey, there is very little area to the rear of the house where a screened porch could be constructed without requiring a variance. Staff RecnsiT ndation If Planning Commission finds that the 8.8' side setback variance will not have a detrimental impact on the neighborhood, a recommendation for approval would be appropriate. L. ^(•57=* CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100 00 (no change from original application) _ After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)#1545 cny SF CTiSSPROPERTY LOCATION Site Address - - - - - - - -- # Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Cii/ li Vfc/.* to*// H* Attach legal description to application if not included on APPLICANT Hame"T^»n v v P V.L Phone (home) “P Phone (work) '^^1 "C^Pl Address: vA vAOOV i City: Pr^or" Zip*. OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (hone) Phone (work) Address:Citv: ZiDJ Date Prooertv Acouired (month/year) ''- -^I (do)Mdo notV also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY PrA««>n^ Zonlno District Pr*»sent Use of ProDertv \ Residential) Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $i3ClXCCJ'^^ n—KAqiieaf. detail: Wv\»\AvOr\ 6v-nrrrrvA^cV\\-U^n ( O^rS- (O r\<crH - - - - - - --- - - -- - - -rrr VARIANCES REQUIRED _ _ _ Lot Area Setbac)c Variances (. Other _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear)7 jTc I'--:*- ■ —''' 'v J-* - - ' ‘ V . '-’-cv lc' rFpij;v}e\*> »Tcvji.v-x:: r uca-r r'aociO ^ V^«'hicf'-co rt-eJcH- tc ciW-:r,v-x-l.: O'.-drtrvcS, HARDSHIP \:^‘'CW Lvce -OCvl.u»cA rrl'^C'W^tTF. C<T ctxf -3C Describe undue hardship or praccical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations! *? v > rr^r>r- i.\-r(:: >. rrb DBSCRIPTIOH OF UNUSOAL PROPKRT' COHDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: *Tr-. -i‘*' -so-V~ \~vv-^ W^cC rU-v REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150 (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). , 3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). . , . 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. . . 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested bv City staff. YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11* X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property '' ' ‘ must sign this application. Please remember that your variance ^.lication is not cggplete—i^—U»e— inforaation has not been incl icied. _ _ _ __ Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _riT-.f-f_ _ _ _.vrr APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE . , . , ^ _The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and corr^oir't^ the best of his/her^nowledge. Applicant's Signatur^ ‘ Date / Qr OWNERS SIGNATURE , ^ _ agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verificatlor/ of-tl?is request. . -/ Owner's Signature-^I ./xf.v oat. Office of this change prior to the meeting. o• V( c -t- f A<@^ ■ I. fi ‘-** ■ A :♦ ^ -'*: > Planning Conunission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson 16 Promt Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning t Zoning Administrator Date: June 14, 1990 Subject: 11546 Scott Proclinow, 4075 Highwood Road Renewal Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IB, Single family lakeshore residential, 1 acre, sewered Application - Request for renewal variance to construct detached garage List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Hardcover Calculations Exhibit P - Elevation Views, Proposed Garage Exhibit G - Survey from Previous Approval, File 11021 Exhibit H - Resolution #1991 Pertinent Facts - 1. The applicant is purchasing this residence from the Ackerberg's, who had received a hardcover and setback variance for a room addition and proposed detached garage in 1986. 2. The applicants constructed the room addition, but did not construct the garage. Mr. Prochnow is requesting to construct the same sire garage in the same location, under the same hardcover conditions as previously approved. The original v/»', :ance approval expired in 1907. 3. Prior to the earlier approval, hardcover in the 75-250* zone was 34,3%. Hardcover approved with that application was an increase to 35.9%. Currently, with the addition and a brick stairway coupled with a few removals that have occurred, existing hardcover appears to be less than the limit imposed by Resolution #1991. Discussion The applicant nas provided elevation views for the proposed garage. The storage area above it, with dormer windows, keep this garage in character with the house. Zoning File #1546 June 14, 1990 Page 2 Since this application was originally approved, the need for a street setback variance for the garage has been eliminated. The code was revised shortly after this approval to allow side accessing garages to be within 10* of the street lot line on a lakeshore lot. Therefore, that variance is no longer necessary. Staff Recoaaendation Staff would recommend approval for renewal of the hardcover variance to allow 35.9% hardcover in the 75-250' zone, per the same conditions as previously approved in Resolution #1991. L -f w CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCB APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) ,^newal Variance Fee $100.00^- - - -—— Tho change trom original application) ' After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) # -fl A 1 'U PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address */c)75^ /i tL'txj J Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ^ ^ - L IT: jF craiO Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Phone (home) ^6 7^ Name ^ ^ i^l\ V. Phone (wor)c) V7/*-9<>79 Address: 7Wcj a /oH'L City: Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) V*?2.^ ^<y^_ Neune ^A-n ^_ _ _ _ _'’one (wor)c)j Address: ^g7’T //«>/»4/fe>^o/ City: CfC^^Q_ _ _ _ _”ip:_^2Ii^±(l — Date Property Acquired !^*7^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT OSB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District ^ t ^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Present Use of Property Residential _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Other (specify) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Coat S ^— /0,<Ka Describe request in detail: d) — cc-^kcL /ytKL^ /a; r*., /pr-», —______^ VARIANCES REQUIRED . -Lot Area _ _ _ Lot Width * * A Hardcover Setbac)c Variances (_ _ _ Front _ _ _ Side K - Other_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-— 1 HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ DESCRIPTION OP ONDSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ X 6. T, 8. REQOIRBD SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if ary changes in existing grade are proposed. S)cetches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll" X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not coapletc if the above Information has not been includ^.' Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all iniorraation required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this aprlication, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date iT- ? </-<PO OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hireby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature ^ v/> _______ Date ^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. Tf-V* ri :• ‘"'f.'- Adjacent Property Oeners' of1 >wei TfxHf/rr/^flheM-------------- ___4-hA nixns for the croDOsei , a. j «♦. t/,-?/* • -. . . ■ P-' also referred to as Land Useproperty located at • - • - :;^—^- -—:—s—- - Application No. _ _ _.• I (we) understand that in executin, thl. acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I («.) am (are) aware of the improvement plan, and that the proposed nelghbofs project or use J HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEE SE73AC:< ZONE; (ciacLS one) 0-75' Existing Hardcover in Zone 4^ *N 250-5G0' 300-1G0O' 4d A. House X .m ^=.F. ^ LENGTH .X . WIDTH a /..F. (f) X .a ^S.F. (j) _ X _a S.F. _ X _a S.F. a. Garage _ X _•“ ■a ' ■ T'S.F. c. Driveway _ X _“Z *r a n-S.F. S >’_ X _2‘t a S.F.<^^ Sidewalk »/_ X _*7 a '7T S.F.'^' • % - X i \ a 57 <» S.F. . X •m »-r «•/ —-S.F.2G' E. Jatio/ Deck . X S.F. F.Landscape ■ . X *-r .> a •S.F. AREA j underlain BY . X a S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X a S.F. X a S.F. 9, Other 5^X Z7 a t /iT S.F. Total Harocoveh in Zone Total Property Area in Zone • [T[ - ?/3^ / A ,. . ^ s S.F. ,F. ^ s ^ x“100 - -A 3 .% o I Citv of OROINI^^ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI NO.1991 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this 36 day of yii 1986 before me a appeared _ the person(s) described ary ^blic within and for said county, personally u e^ B<^ncLC-_ _ _ _ known to me to be executed the foregoingin and who instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. : hennep 'n n.„ .NOTARY PUPLIC __^ C//OC- MY CO.^-LMISSION EXPIRES STATE C? MINNESOTA ) }SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this ^ /U day of 19SF, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ hnown to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. t f.' - NOTARY PUBLIC 0-* ■ // /?87 MY com :-iission expires Page 4 of 4 City of ORO>^^ i,a m 53S RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC| NO. 1991 1986. r ATTEST: 3. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (May 12, 1987). 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned applicant has read, unders^-f^od and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Crono City Council on this 12th day of May, Doiotny M. ^a^llin. City Clerk Mary C. But^rT Mayorf P-'ooerty Owndr / I-age 3 of 4 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY NO.199L 4 The property contains 3,604 square feet <34.3^ of existing hardcover in the 75-250’ setback zone. The proposed hardcover in tSe 75-250’ zone, including the 165 square feet of gravel over plastic, is 3,769 square feet or 35.^%. There is an existing boathouse in the 0-75' setback zone, which in oartially located within the adjacent City alleyway. in the C-75' setback zone is squ.re feet or 12.4%. 6 The City Council has considered this application includinq tie finding and recomn-endations of the f reoorts by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed^variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 7. The City Council finds that the conditions rtor/t/y ‘il ^ I? “pls“t-^a f?re-t;«a%’l Vr Vt'htr'da ‘^|eV Vo 5= rndVVlVV rkVtLT-V\»^^^VtVt-o? the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono ^ity Council hereby ltbdiVsVn“VVlO.V, ’'s;bJpU^^^^^^ ‘lVVh\Yrtg\ V\rbe“o««d 5^ “frVYeIttelt" SStk^ro^eV^V-tSt 3^V%“toTff94, sulTect to the following conditions: 1. The maximus, hardcover “““"f f,', P’^^/caV fs' adv'isV removals of equivalent amounts of existing hardcover. 2 The existing boathouse cn the property is /.I'i".: conforming structure by virturo Ci^^^ pertaining to such structures. Page 2 of 4 jCITY J : OF .*:*! IDRONC^ City o RESOLUTION OF THE C NO. ■i, A RESOLDTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION AND SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION PILE #1021 WHEREAS, Jan & Nora Akerberg (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 4075 Highwood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows; Lot 11, Highwood Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County (hereinafter "the property"); and Minncrota; WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivision 2 and 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the construction of a room addition and detached garage, which garage will be located 27' from the street lot line where a 35 foot setback is normally required, and which will increase hardcover in 75-250' lakeshore s .b^ck r.one from 34.34 existing to 35.9%, where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1021 2. The property is located in the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application oi April 21, 1986, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: A) The proposed garage will replace an existing garage which is 1.7 feet from the side lot line and 4.1 feet from the street lot line; the new garage will be located to meet the side setback requirement and nearly meets the required street setback requirement; and the new garage opens to the side, thus creating a safer street access. B) The applicant cai. remove significant amounts of exist;*j hardcover so that no net increase in hardcover would res*-j.t; the Planning Commission recommended an increase in hardcover by allowing a 165 square foot area of rock-covered *>i,.jt;ic to remain in place in order to maintain adequate basement water protection. Page I of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA THIS !T?J Hf;S MlCROrllEQ COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) CITY OF OROHO ) I Dorothy M. Hallln, City Clerk of the City of Orono. Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have coopered the foregoing copy of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Orono with the original record of such resolution In the Minutes of the proceedings of said City Council at a oeetlng of said City Council held on May 12_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. 19 =6 . and that the saoe Is a true saidand correct copy of said resolution was duly adopted Council at said oeetlng. City in Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set ny hand and seal this 2nd day of _ _ _ _June_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, 19 ^6 / * / ^irorothy M. Hallln, City Clerk (SEAL) i STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) CITY OF ORONO } THIS BttB KllCR9Fa?«[0 I Dorothy H. Hallin, City Clerk of the City of Orono, Hennepin County* Minnesota* do hereby certify that I have oonpared the foregoing copy of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Orono with the original record of such resolution in the Minutes of the proceedings of said'City Council at a oeeting of said City Council held on May 12 . 19 86 . and that the sane is a true and correct copy of said resolution was duly adopted by said City Council at said meeting. In Witness Whereof* I have hereunto set my hand and seal this _ _ _ _2nd_ _ _. day of _ _ _ _June_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, 19 86 // ^irorothy M. Ndllin, City Clerka (SEAL) To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardaon Proa: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building ft Zoning Administrator Date: June 14, 1990 Subject: #1547 Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC), Intersections of West Ferndale Road ft County Road 15 - Conditional Use Permit ~ Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IA Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.23, Subdivision 4 (A) - Conditional use permit required for construction of an underground vault to house sewage meter installed on existing sewage force main. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Cook's Report dtd 6/13/90 Exhibit E - Certificate of Survey Exhibit P - Hennepin County DOT Permit Exhibit G - Site Plan, Profile, Plan ft Sections Review of Application -* The HWCC proposes the installation of a meter station within the County Road right-of-way and property owned by the Nature Conservancy at the intersections of West Ferndale Road and County Road 15. The meter station itself will be underground with a control panel installed above existing grade. The City Engineer's report advises that the control panel is the same control panel that was used at the Orono Lift Station. The control panel is 6' in height, 2' in width and 6' long. Cook's repo*.t also suggests the need for landscape screenino for the control panel. It would be staff's recommendation that if land scaping is to be considered, that special care be given to the type of landscaping so as to not create any sighting problems at the intersection of Ferndale and the County Road. The MWCC is obtaining both temporary and permanent easements from the Nature Conservancy, for the meter station. In reviewing Exhibits F and G, it would appear that a small section of the eastbound right-hand lane will be temporarily removed during construction. The eastbound lane will continue to function through the construction, and as Cook's report also notes, this will not involve any restriction with the use of Ferndale Road. Z4. I Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & \\\\ Associates Engineers A Architects OnoC M A A »l Aiwiir C *t V4V»- L I ,j^C CSK*- *1 a*»»' • c-’c« *1 fwoTM* ( ‘.diin »t G k^»yx»t Wun M t»r^ C »» • Gc»aa« »f •cf * *r«»' C »f » M.-W' »» W** * •‘trt:'' »f V3I •«-i: »« v<~t^ ’ •» *x<<» • >»«»'■« »C D*r«l O U>W>K* »t ♦"vrMt \A ^rrTor »» %•«"<*• C l»rc^ »f 1 « Wjuns »l Cafi M ► c*^C »u«i« *'» I «rgui I’l •VMF- • Ur«)*J =jr— 1 »f vt»« » >c »l *~0 i C*i«r- *t v-jr 'f 0 'Mat •-CTM. • •na’VT> » G^ • V** i jf'ir' »f l *“■•<> ■ »l »K*C »vrwt Ai^ fgrvi w Cm} A >C^ *-> 0 »l C««l Oir** »l C^AAn A l-AMOA l« u A«Mrw)r u O'lan June 13, 1990 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota SS323 Attni Jeanne Mabusth Ret MVCC Meter Station Our File No. 139-1547 Dear Jeanne: u. h,ve tevlevd th. pUn .ubAltt.d b, th. MWCC for conttructlon of th. Hot.r Station on County Road 15 and Femdale Road. The Meter Station will be underground with a control panel oounted above ground. The panel is being removed from the Orono Lift Station site « this location. The City may desire some screening or camouflaging of the control panel. Construction will result in temporary disruption of 15. The proposed construction would not conflict with the Femdale R intersection. Please call if you have any questions. Yours very truly. BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK k ASSOCIATES. INC. Glenn R. Cook GRCidh grc/58 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 \ HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATiON 320 Washington Avenue South • Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 APPLICATION FOR INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES Countv Road No..Permit No. 19077 Municipalitv_2r°I!£ LOCA1 lON AND/OR DESCRIPTION OF WORK Application it hereby madt lot pwrmssMsn to placa. construct artd thareaftar maintain a Vault _______ , ----- .., — - ■ a .iPPnp,».v»»r^..o.yH..^w,yNn 15 all n:ITox 1 tp.atg IV 0 ^ edst QT Center] 1/16 Of . Russell Vvonue m anoroxiratelv 13.T east of centgriine PusseH Avenue._____________ _ NAME of applicant ^ ^---------- ■rrm-------PhoneVears Park Centre, C. 5'‘h it., it. -aul, 'A 5s ‘01 _ _ _ _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------tt«i« ne .............................to ■*.^cc Clt» >'aii> ir organisation performing work Contractor unoer Sid Address ___________________________________________ Phone (Businettl. tt«i* Phone (Emergencvl_ I. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - Submu live copies el detailed piirii inowme ivpe end location ol ii*uaiiei*on. ns Under^ound □ Aenei O Other 3. TYPE OF UNOIRGHOUND CONDUIT S4M □ Multiduct □ Pieit« G Concrete □ Steel Oepih tfon □ Cooper □ Ceore□ ___ :o“Omih 8' 3. METMQOQP INSTAtUNG UWOEW WOAQtEOS i D ■oring - Jeching - Pneumegopner 3 the eastbourd rlcnt-^and lane ulll nee^_ to be rer.ovea tc construct vaul : 4 AREA TO BE DISTUHBEO TRAVELED SURFACE aHOULOER >c s Concrete 6<lumiitoul s Bituminous Gravel BOULEVARD Sod Fieic Creus STRUCTURES □ Curb A Guitar □ StStTMih □ S.grtaii 5. All wore under rr*u permit will be completed on or beiore □ Culverts □ RoedSiens □ Other ___ □ Trees C ShruH ‘lovefT.ber 1, 1991 Date • PERMIT IS VOID AFTER THIS DATE! If work cannot be compieied within detti tpecilied, e wrisien laowatl lor permrssion ol ealeniion must be made lo the Mennepin County Oeperiment ot T'eniporteiion. \ Eecept lor the negiieani acts ol the County, its ^nts and iis amptoyees. the Utility or Permittee shell euome ell liebiliiv lor end save the County. Its aoems end .ts employees. Harmless Irom eny end ell claims lor demeges. Kiions or cauiM ol action arising out ol the work to be dorw l^em ^ the coniiru^ uses by the Permittee, .nctudlng but not limned lo the piecing, eonsirucnng, recenttrucnng. rTtamiaming a«d using or swd utility under tha%plication and Permit lor construction. • • • i . - II Wei the undcrsi^ted. iterewith accept me terme end cor*diiior»t ol trte regulations as laid done* by me County or Menneoirt end agree to H»il» eomoWlh«ew.dS to the selillecbonol me Menneorn County Oeperiment olT.eruooftaiion. . ____, ^ Hetroo9U>iR-wt>^te Control Cofiwission Orggauebon. P4\ X, V r-3///?(^ To; Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Pro«; Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building ft Zoning Administrator Dates June 14, 1990 Subject: #1547 Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC), Intersections of West Fr.rndale Road ft County Road 15 - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IA Pertinent Ordinance - .. , , tSection 10.23, Subdivision 4 (A) - Conditional use permit required for construction of an underground vault to house sewage meter installed on existing sewage force main. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Cook's Report dtd 6/13/90 Exhibit E - Certificate of Survey Exhibit F - Hennepin County DOT Permit Exhibit G - Site Plan, Profile, Plan ft Sections Review of Application - The MWCC proposes the installation of a meter station within the County Road right-of-way and property owned by the Nature Conservancy at the intersections of West Ferndale Road and County Road 15. The meter station itself will be underground with a control panel installed above existing grade. The City Engineer's report advises that the control panel is the control panel that was used at the Orono Lift Station. The control panel is 6' in height, 2' in width and 6 long. Cook s repo*t also suggests the need for landscape screenino for the control panel. It would be staff's recommendation that if land scaping is to be considered, that special care be given to the type of landscaping so as to not create any sighting problems at the intersection of Ferndale and the County Road. The MWCC is obtaining both temporary and permanent easements from the Nature Conservancy, for the meter station. In reviewing Exhibits F and G, it would appear that a small section of tne eastbound right-hand lane will be temporarily removed during construction. The eastbound lane will continue to function through the construction, and as Cook's will not Involve any restriction with the use of Ferndale Road. 8 ' I Zoning File #1547 June 14, 1990 Page 2 of 2 Staff Recomendatlon -Z ROComenuciw^wu staff reco««nd. .“u‘bje«”w tSe MWCC providing fPP/®^®^® ^^^^users of the public roadway and S«t "^h^.°“SVndar5r of the Hennepin County Departnent of Transportation, CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USB APPLICA' PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 1155 Shoreline Drive, Orono #.1.5.47 : : y i,uW Prop'.Jity Identification Number (P.I.D.) .-J iiT ■ y i, Ip f;|)S Pi**ase attach legal description to application if not included APPLICANT Phone (home) N/A Name Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Phone (worlc) 222-8423 Address 230 E. 5th Street Citv Paul Zio 55101 OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) N/A Name Hennepin County Dept, of Transp.Phone 935-3381 Address 320 Washington Ave. So.Citv Hopkins Zio 55343 Date Procertv Acouired (month/year) I (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL OSB PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee _ _ _ _ S 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application _ _ _ _ $125.00 Residential accessory Use X $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _ _ _ _ $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _ _ _ _ $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _ _ _ _ $250.00 Coiwnercial/Industrial Use _ _ _ _ $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain - - - Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more _ ^ ' Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS ^ a$200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (•► consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation with Subdivision $250.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _ _ _ _ $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT OSB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District LR-IA Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) Riqht-of-Way DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST ... Describe request in detail: Construction of an underground Vault to house sewage meter being Installed on existing sewage rorcefnain. -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- % REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map. 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMBHTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17" OR SMALLER) POR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is compleite. Initials of Clerical Staff t_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses Incurred in review of this application, and certifies tt^t the information supplied is true and correct to tha best of his/hWt )cnow^redge. Applicant's sionature^^^^ ^ oa^ ^- - - - OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acicnowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes or investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature refer to attached permit ___ Date — Applirint must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building 6 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ss*s sS is?* - 44 i« 5 <^ u i^S£S:3s ?“-g! ssii^^S si ‘iai I* 8 - sS*?Ss^ •{ ui tn 2"->Sa 2^8-1;**Sii5«a »^ •> 2 ►ssx$:^s lii “555 ♦ap;- s s:irsa * t"|2xS “S^5«S«sIHisSfc a w 00 > !»”g| ^ M 1*1 U< 40 ^ Ui III liSi 87 a. Q. 5 ^ S«.SS^5s 2 2 s y SsS§y2 r I 5 l§ s& UiII .ssgs«::s «£«Sb'^ 75!!{3S , 7 z o M B M M W O •- “S5g«»a r» w O >S^S§y2 a Ui •>• 5 w 5 sflsi"^S«l§5 ,\ 8*=S2 _ z O N ^ So «a •-) 2 iip. ~a§§“ s N4 W O K V) < oe u w in ^SuigS •" 3^55*2I ^ ^ M S sIHiHHs or flc Ui Ui 25 M MiSS5 ‘d a w w "i-i 712^ 1 |5 O O M •» «8=-:3 M O X X S 2 •• X SSySz;. 5511*3 ?i2l5 . ""s • V > Ui < « o o >n ^ •2SS2Su> o O ^ Z s zzl ^ a &. o **' d 2 “ 2 IS K§“*i= I M M ^ < Z Z lO ^ o Q a o. « 5 O ku Ui N gH.i *;s2 25li S 0 0 « ;tfz I 8 2 ►’ < - 0 • 0 “^53 ? ♦dsisfS 2§SS “s ““ ?M V V M•asESS tfi X ^ r «v Ui Q SSjrSg- •A UI *0*:i|22a :3is5gy2 M tu g 5 B 7832:!,j.guo«g •A 0 Z -i <7l8sa:;2S2S5 :; !-5s ssss::2 ^ < t 1 M M C < in ^ fc- c > • 0 < < < M 0 a & m z J8 02-100038MOOOHILLMOOOHILL200 MOOOHAVZATAi «**x2 “silaS S 0 X X ^ S bM s 01S 2 s ^ a 1^2! bM 3 M“i Ui oeiM B 4 W llli a •< Ui l||3 i|ii 8 < WIpi o s 8 f' k.ZfT-'MjT iN' i S|M S ofi M M S I M ^ .sii S *o X Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers * Architects G »l fcCx-1 A »l WtfSf C »f V*-v<- I iTW»« »* •<"j« € *1 '■^nr t Cjc« ?»wm« f •«»»» u«n a wx"« n wi«' w te*v c ^ * trt* • Cedar *t *cr^ *<?«*• « Dor^c ».r;4dl ^ « •».•»> »( Vjr« * »t V3« »»N3 »l M«-«r • »l »l D».«l O Leucu »£ T>s»«t \V »lr»*var »t WcftorC ir>«l t vt»r«> 'I <«rr»tn r Arajrnon Pt • %3#i »l ► C»-!C »VM« ( *rgkk »l ••cx^ • '.<r*jd »| 0*r» . iijrv *f V»j.i A 5re »• *«s«« j CiiAir. •! wn»« »l A'jr« 0 Jlad n •»ot-y*. • A'drvjr »■• • »«A*Adr w<d ( ;»"!»*« l #r*C Cy^,** « Pt •r^t r^A-Jd aia Agrwi M t«j AiC» ,*-> O »l C«i« Ov*> 't C-AAM A f-viun l«M PnuTMi ryjn M Oior June 13. 1990 City of Orono Bos 66 Crystal Bay. Minnesota 5S323 Attnx Jeanne Mabusth Rei MVee Meter Station Our File No. 139-1547 Dear Jeannei Ve have reviewed the plan submitted by the MUCC for construction of the Meter Station on Cou.ity Road 15 and Femdale Road. The Meter Station will be underground with a control panel mounted above ground. The panel la being removed from the Orono Lift Station site this location. The City may desire some screening or camouflaging of the control panel. Construction will result in temporary disruption of 15. The proposed construction would not conflict with the Femdale Road intersection. Please call if you have any questions. Yours very truly. BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDEPJ.1K & ASSOCIATES. INC. Glenn R. Cook GRCtdh grc/58 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul. Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 Hcsise \ HENNEPIN COUNTY . DEPAniMENTOF TRANSPORTATION 320 WwAinqion Avenu* South Hopkint, Minnetoia 55343 APPLICATION FOR INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES County Road No. Parmtt Nn 19077 IMuoiciDtltty I LOCA1 .ON ANO/OR DESCRIPTION OF WORK Applicjlion i» herfbv made for ptfmi«.o« to place, conuruci and thereafter -----n ----- ■ iVnn .--rrn.im^tPrv -^T edst oi ce'nternne or ^ Tv?nr .interline >vpn„R, ~ -----------------------------rrTTT^----------------------------------------------------------------------- 222-8423 NAME of applicant ________ ___— ------------—-r—^-------m. ■g»7ri------------------------------------:-ears Parte Centre, :3Q C. nn :r.. ut. -3ul. ■:« :..J_--------------------- --- t.i» p„„0-o,vp^Mon «.!. Contractor .moer ti)d to •^.<CC-------------------------------- Addrat*---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------aiQ ca Phona iButinaitl.,Phona lEmargancvl. , Tvae OF CONSTRUCTION - SulWTKi ll••eop•«ol <*tt»l•dp»ln^l^o^Mna tvp* •^•oeauoAOl m*iaiUI»o«. ^ I>i0.fgf0und □ ^ 2. TYPE OF UNOenGROtiND CONDUIT S<N Owin Q MulliOuCt □ PiatKC □ CO<Kf«M □ SlM< □ CAOotf □ Catm*□ :o'0*Ol» Qt loinaf I 3 method of INSTAULINO UNDER ROaOBEOS □ Bofing - JKking - Pn«wn*goi*»**» a oastfcound Hc,nt-^and lane will ng£l to be rerxivea tc ronstrjct vaui:-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. ABEA TO BE OISTURBEO twaveleo surface Concftt* 8>lun»noul STRUCTURES □ Curb A Cutl«f □ S.<M««rk □ S.^« SMOULDER 8 □□□ Bilununou* Cr»r« CMl««fn Road S>am Otfv»« ___ BOULEVARO □ Sod 3 Fraid C<aM 8 Tf#a» SAruoa 8. All awk undtf tft’i oo»m. <» < -■V*" Hm»»« Cokkn. -------------•" 'r,r: « .»«..-k,,-.............~ »-» ,i«,«c~.»cnroUslon Org|OU.|ie<t. BaV ^ V 1 ^^aia pertinent REGULATtONS i—l: f dtv>CM <Ad Ih<li coolwm 10 l^# M.,h^ bv t»*« Sut« o* M.nn*toM M«nu« SuDOi»fn«>i ’ “7#- r..c ^ onr,.H^c«nno. o. 7. All nom.r>« d.«.c*l. bi>r<MN. •I.vn.n *o«.om.n, ,^,4I t, pro..d.d by 0<<l(>« ur o»o,n,/.„oni o^1o.m,mq lb« [.iL*^l<!-'"*?««««^***««l-r'-CK*.WU*lb.p.A:W..O«.,n.«dbv.«.H,„n.O^Coun.yO««.,n^.OlT,.n«.,„«o«. . . .. «. ."«h.*r<«WU,..lb. kwtl.*n.f.d.n ,oodf.M.,., .It „n«. 5. Ottour routing th.ll r.quir. 72 hourt mTvvk. none, lo fh. H.nn.0,n County Utility SKttoo. ____ Ml MUIItnr IhM tm aaoAn 1... .<.1^ ________________ County • ifE. — 2. HC 3137 (4 «4I tn - V 1. RESTORATION HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 3?0 Watnmgton Avenut ^uth Hopkini. Minnesota 55343 UTILITY PERMIT and SPECIAL PROVISIONS SPECIAL PROVISIOI ^ « NO19077 •17 :7 BASE Type CUSS 5 SURFACE Two. 23U AC 85-100 SHOULDER T»». CL/iSS 2 BOULEVARD - Ditch Tnpmil 3 ” Depth 6"□.nth FULL □.nth 3"AS R£,UmD Prime Jnint CUT OP. SAKED WMfh !U«inS HL,Uii.£D Tack . Cura 2. TRAFFIC DIRECTION _ AS PER MlIiNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORH TRAFFIC CCT.TP.CL DEVICES AS PER ATTACMEO PLATE NO. - tSE ATTACHED PLRTAdLE flAPJlIER t‘U.TL 3. REMARI^ - VaL'LT AfiC KH EL2VATI0:S SHALL iE TUCh THAT EXTE.SIUi LF THE CPJlDE PTICM C/L KILL :.CiT CCIiFLICT V.TTH FUTURE CCNSTRUCTICN. - SEE A'lTACHED SPECIAL PROVISICXS NO WORK PERMITTED WITHIN ROADWAY SURFACE DURING WINTER. UNLESS "FFtr '.L PERMISSION** IS OBTAINED. NO WORK WILL BE PERMITTED ON SATURDAYS. SUNDAYS OR HOLIDAYS, UNLESS “SPECIAL PERMISSION“ IS OB TAINED FROM THIS OFFICE. ‘ It it txpratslv undantood that thii rmit it conditioned upon replacement or restoration of the roadway to its original or to a tatif- factory condition. ALL LEGAL REQUIREMENT*- SHOWN ON REVERSE SIDE AND ON ATTACHED “SPECIAL PROVISIONS" TO BE COMPLIED WITH. THE DATE WHEN WORK IS COMPLETED MUST BE REPORTED TO HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANS PORTATION PERMIT SECTION. TELEPHONE: 935 3381. Extantion 311. LIMITATIONS If the County shall make any improvement or change on all or any part of <ts right of way upon, ovar. under or along a county road, and such change or improvement rapuirat the moving or changing of public utility facllitiet in luch right of way. then, in that event, the applicant herein shall, after notice in writing by the County, alter, change, vacate or remove from the county road that part of its facilities necessary to conform to the improvement at its own cost and without any cost to the County. APPROVED: HENNEPIN COUN-TY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT By. vcu: ncrancrini i t njunwAV uerx NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF THE WORK HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE. MAINTENANCE DIVISION-PERMIT SECTION 320 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343 Oear Sir: Please be advised that the work auihonred under Permit No. luued to. the City. Towndsip or Village, was completed____________ .for work in _____Road .and IS ready for inspection (Please eomow- this form and return it withm 24 houn after completion of the worki ” * , - - SPECIAL PROVISIONS .... ' ■'* 'ROADWAYSUHPACEI ' ' *’• A. CONCRETE PAVEMENTS 1. Openingi The opening mice m j concrete ni*ement mult Oe lo located mat no nCe .i witnm three t3» feet a conitructioo |omi. It the tide of the opening n wiihm three □! leet of econitfuctiop ioint. the coooete pavement muit oe removed to the joim. Before breaking the concrete, the tlib muit firii oe cut vmth a concrete ta* to 1 depth o» not let! than t.vo 121 nchei. and the eeact location thereof mutt be approved by the Hennepwi-County Oeoartjrent ohTraniportation. All broken con mete mutt be removed from ute and dnooted of. NO OPENINGS SHALL BE MADE IN PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE DURING WINTER MONTHS EXCEPT FOR EMERGENCIES IF pPENiNG HAS TO BE MADE. ADJACENT EDGES WILL HAVE TQ8E REMOVED ONE FOOTBEYOND ORIGINAL EXCAVATION THE FOLLOWING SPRING AND REPLACED BY A PERMANENT PATCH ~r 2. Backfill and Compaction . . ___ After tba txcavabon hat been completed. Ute reauiremenit for the backfill, i.e.. kind of material, compaction. etc...sha4l ba the aame at specified for Ste repairt made fotJ TtencniRg or Sub turfKe Operationt J.JSee paragraph "C~ teicwi.^ 2,. 3. Raplacament of Concrete The concrete uiad for me final turfact repair ihalt contiti of 3A42 higli early ttrength concrttaao meef Minnetota Oepvtment of Trantportatlon Specification dated 1983. Spec. Mo. 2301. Thit concrete to b^iecured onjy. from ,comme/cial plantt which can fumith a mixture that it approved by Hennepin County. The final flmth mutt bc'burlao dra^d or broomed to that it will match the turface of the adjoining concrete tiab. and cured with plaitic paper. All conitruction jomtt ihaM be replaced. The freth concrete patch ihall be protected from all traffic contactt for at :«att 72 hourt after it hat been fimthed. ji. B. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTS 1. Opcningt When necettarv to cut ooenmgi in Bituminout lurfaced roaowavi me ure of opening and location thereof mutt confo»m-to -/..tire and location ipecified m the permit, or to ti/etpecified by Hennepin County. ‘.Vhen cutting the openmg. the edges are to be cut in a ttraighi Ime. antLtidca to be tmooih and vertical. Ho ragged «dge| permitted. Cutti .g to be done with taw. jack* hammer, tpadet or umilar approi^ tools. All excavated bituminous material to oe removed from ute and ditpgied of. No'open- ingi mall be made <n bituminous pavements cf ring winter monihi except *or emergencies. • .... 2. BeekfiN end Compection v. After me excavation has been completed, the reouire.nenti for backfill. 1 e.. kind of material, compaction, etc., than be me 7. time at tpecified lot the repairs made ior "Trenching or S'jb Surface Operjtioru (See paragraph "C" below.) . ^ 3. Raplacament of Concrete Base •. ,; - .r-' 1.- * j ,r" V " Ute proccduret lilted under A 3 Allow the coiKrete to cure for 48 houri beiore-|>racing bituminous materials.. j •, 4. Binimincut Tack Coal A tack coat mall be aoplicd lo all adjacent bttuminoot and concrete facet before placing the bituminout turface courie S’. Reiteratlen of Blacktop . nvn.- -t ' > , All blacktop turfacet ere to be restored at toon at pottiWe after backfilling hat been completed. Bituminous surfacing material • • may be obtained from most commercial "Blacktop ’ ptanti The kino and graoe mun be aoofoved by the Hennepin County Department of Traniportetion. Replacement of the bituminout maienal ihall be-made in layers r»oi to exceed two 12) inches m depth, each layer to be compacted with an approved roller or vibrating tamoer unleii oiherwiie tceciailv authorired 6. Damage to Blacktop Any blacktop area whicn hai been icarred by equipment, lugi. c eati. :eeth, etc . mall be replaced or rjoaired ai directed by Hennepin County ^ TRENCHING OR SUB SURFACE OPERATIONS 1. Opeiiin^*’ *• ------- - ------------------ Trencnei for conduits, water, itcam. oil and gn pipci. lewers and.jHhec utnitfes placed .vithm tne right of way shall be located ai approved by Hennepin County. Trenehei for construction along tn* highway snail not be openen for a distance of more than ___300 feet at any on# time, unless especially^mori«d. • .-..i-- • * ♦••r -- - • • n * 2. Storagt of Excavatad Materials i. ' *A-: i:. ■'*'.* • Excavated or other material shall be placed or stored un the side of the oocraiion farthest from tne traveled roadunleo oihec- wise authorised by Hennepin County, j.id m such .nanner that there will ba no interference with the How of water in ar^y gutter, drain, pipe, culvert, ditch or other waterway ^ 3. Backfill and Compaction ____________________ - •' t * r.-. • 1 •. After excavation has been completed, it may be refilled with the cxca<ated material which hat been removed, wilts the following «i •!-exceptions; _____ If the excavated material consists of mucky, soft or unstable soil bou'dert. or large rock, d must be removed and disposed ’---------0* ouuide the county tighLof way.and repfaced with granular isandyj matenai___________.• » j in v« • The refilling of the ttench shall be done with Clast 3 gtavei or other approved material compacted by the ordinary comoaction method and fhail follow av rapidly as pouible the oiacmg of tub surface structures and shall be completed m such manner es will conform to tfse earth shoulder or tubgrade or as directed bv trie Menneom County Deoartment of Transoortation - -4t Replacement of Qravei Base-------- -------------- — --------------------------- The gravel bate man b* reoiaced w th aporoved material and ccmpaciad All compaction muss be m accordance with u>e Minna- iavjam_CRCNC ■OTVLimOT m. »tamn m.___ CM 19077 UOTtvta cmnrrr K»A»murT or rvtuc wowmm 120 ir«ibtiift*a A««aua Hiuaaat* tlMS vrtLZTiM •tcnew n*me_ MiBia arno :C KrH AoeAM— Ri:5^g-.L:. r.T.. ________ tm»rric oimiew aiRfts laaa traffic will ka rar»ttta« OcrlM ■arblat fcaora. uaraatrictaO traffic akall ka oalatatMO at “"all atkar tioaa. I>^karaatrlcra4 traffic aball ka aaintaina4 at all tl»aa. _ _lAM alaaaraa varuttaO a«ly Ourtaf tiaa rariaC atata4 an yarait i ka an )ak atta and yraMtlr ptacaO prlar ta )ek atart. ^ V 7 ^^^la^lratf Traffic Cantral tifnl«« a l^^tacal yallca anC raalCantt aball ka natlfiaC af ptajact. achaCullnf an4 tiaa alanant. ^^riacaan aball ka ftayarlr aaulpyaO aitb aaata. batO bata. anC atfb paOClas. MOPLATOW ■»— a ikruiqi bFrqrrc»*»ci Mironomrt ___ ItAM eUAAOAAlL ___ CAPLI OUAADHAJt fPCCXAl. XlirLArt APWTtllAJICtl Tka Mannaain Cawnty kayaftnant af Public waraa. Traffic tarvicaa lactian will taaova anC raplaca. tba caat af abicb aball ka ratnburaad ky tba applicant. eUAIIO PMTi ___ •!«* POtTl Tba applicant aball tanrva anC raplaca at hia atpanaa ai pat tba apacificatiana. aiawa - Tna applicant aball ba caapanatbla fat tba tiaali caaaval anC tanparary aattlac af aiyna anC lanaciata taplacanant af aifna CanayaC. ant •tanOarO Ocainary Canpactian ftatbad ^X*Tba backfill aball ba caapactad in aceordanea «itb fill.IP af tba mnnaaata Nifkuay Oapartoc laacificatiana fat hitbuay canattwctian. Danaitr aball ka aecardina te tba Ocdinary Canpact»P* liesijp] ill ka aur«ayad ta inauta carract plaeanant uitbin Hannapin Caunty P/v.j^Wtllitr inatallatiai A rapraaantativa fran tka canatmcttan fira and tba anpinaarinf firn aball ka avatlabla at all tinaa far anarpancy aarb. ttintar aarb > Ravaabar IS thru April IS aball ba canatdarad uintar «arb. Warb durinp tkia period aball a« an a day-ta>day baaia at tba diaeratian af tba Mannapin County Hiybuay rapcoaantativo. ^ trail caainya aball ba apuippad altb pratoetiva lacked cavar. ___ Auforad craaainfa leaiinp ra«uirodl _ _ Caolnf aball ka filled citb aaod or paa rack oad tba aada ceaantad at btickad abut. epon cut approved ICroaalbp aball ba node ona»balf at a tinai Curkad ataa • lacata pit at toaat S foot bobind curb. Mocldtr area • lacata pit at laaat IP Caat froc traveled lana. ^^■bax: ka tipbt abootad. Rball ka onav fenced. ka contlnMoca citk job protroaa. l^lt aball ka furtbar __________d •tataad tkot WAJTE CCMRCL CCM. c. alll ka TOi Ilklo for •ointononco of any failotoa doa to oattlonont. atoaien. lack af vayatation ytoatb. f«tl ilotod probloM Cor a paaiod cl tnraa 111 r*df* after ca^latiao of prajoct. .^apattWnt af Puklia tka tka■onoapio Ca • ty^.j niipl f/Sl/PP n Proa: Date: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator June 13, 1990 Subject! #1548 Julie S. Jensen, 2700 Ethel Avenue - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-lC, Single family lakeshore residential, % acre, sewered * ^ Application - Request for front and side setback variances to constiuct additions to existing house. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey with Currently Existing Improvements Survey/Site Plan with Proposed Improvements Construction Plans (Footprint) Documentation from 1976 Variance Pertinent Facts - 1. Existing house is 2.8* from the side lot line abutting an alley, where a 15* setback normally would be required. This alley is not improved but does contain City water lines. There is no intent at this time for the City to develop this alley. It appears to be maintained by the neighboring property owner as yard area. ^ ^ 2. Applicant propos-s to construct a 3-season porch and first from the existing house, continuing the 2.8 side setback from the alley. A variance for the first story deck was granted for this in 1976. That deck was built and has since been removed. 3. The existing house is 18.8* from the front lot line, where a 30 setback is normally required. Applicant proposes to construct a second story over the existing first story, with a 2 cantilever over the front of the house. That cantilever would therefore be 16.8* from the street lot line. Again, the portion of this addition would encroach into the 15' side setback. t. Applicant was recently granted building permits for grade- level decks at the rear of the house. A hardcover review at that time indicated hardcover of 15.1% where 30% would be allowed. The new proposed additions would increase hardcover to 17.3%. Lot coverage by structures would increase to 12.4%, meeting the 15% limit. Zoning File 11548 June 13, 1990 Page 2 of 2 Discussion - Applicant has not provided an elevation view of the proposed second story addition, however, a copy of the previous building plan is on file. Staff has not calculated the area of foundation above and below grade in order to define the height of the house, although it would appear that the existing house is probably at the 30' height limit or just below it, and a new second story addition could not have a peak height of more than 1-2' above the existing peak to keep within the necessary limits. This would have to be reviewed before a building permit could be issued. The applicant would be well advised to submit a cross section of the proposed second story addition to verify that a height variance will not be required. Although the existing and proposed north wall of the house is 2.8' from the alleyway, the nearest building to that side of the house is the neighbors* detached garage, approximately 30' away. The proposed additions appear to have no significant impact on reducing light or open space for any neighboring properties. The additions do not cause any lot coverage or hardcover problems. Staff has received no negative comments from any neighbors. The Kauffmans, neighbors to the north, have inJicated that they are in support of the application. Staff Recosimendation - Planning Commission should consider whether or not the proposed additions will have a negative impact on the neighborhood. If not, a recommendation for approval could be based on the existing location of the house in relation to lot lines. CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION #1 Initial Application Fee S175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee Sino.OO (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) AS 1 PROPERTY LOCATION w Site Address ^Ibb P.ihg.1 D^vlFviii g- ^ yffiij-^n-rCL Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) • ill • -^*-1 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name CuTTiS R (Phone (heme) V7<-7l93 Phone (worlc) Address: ^loc City I \\ aufj\rdL. Zip:__/ __ OWNER (if deferent than applicant) C_ij6.-n^» “k Oe,N:^eisl E Name • J llL Phone (home ) “M -1 I ^ ,S Phone (wor)c) - O - Addiass: D Ct\)^s.i^e . City: \A^ CiL|7rLT<T Date Property Acquired A f.Tft<Ng.r _______(month/year) I (do) Cfdo n^€7) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Present Use of Property HrNfVvP •Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 30 qoo' Describe request in detail :J3u/( jtdfL nAsAt^f4 n-(' — ♦ rw ✓ . __________________________ ^ — VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setbac)c Variances ( X Lot Width Front yC ____ Hardcover Side _____ Rear) Other^^^^ -p. Kt<d. r>tl Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from str^ict enforcement of zoning regulations; P"tn C1q^IL=- ■4c _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _-■_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _’ DBSCRIPTIOII OP OHOSOAL PROPERTY COHDITIOHS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements;^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Comoleted Application Form ^ ^ . 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150 (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). ^ 3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. » ^ 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. S)cetches or plans of floor and elevation views. * i4„4. 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR_ _ A HORKING COPY (11* X 17’ OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTO^_ _ The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. remember that vour variance application la not coaplete—if—the abo^ infons»^^iQ" has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "e“a^lcant^I?fby agrees to provide all requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (stall time not covered by original fee payment) and/or incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's Signature - - - Date - - - OMMBRS SIGNATURE ^ The owner hereby aOcowledges and agrees to this authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature AppilcInrmus7hI7e"riY submTttals into the City offices 25 Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission «re ^e^d th^ third Monday of each month. Applicants roust be ® review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make «"»"9ements to have authorized agent attend in your plac. and to advise the Building t Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. Ir xS § s “ssg* o ic ae u ss^si;;3 I ‘ M «i M M -i lA N M & a 5 M N W O O M ^ IftI o ^•« ii« Ml ae 2 o SSS* lA M g in Ml 155 - ss- 53•X o: « in 's|lh^ u u 5. g C w w 3 ^ o u ^*‘?5S-;5?!? j=S “S “-si t ■S Ml in M ^ u > ^s:?:= O S Z w 2 ss^Rf:5 -^SSis:-M Ml 1*1 Ml ^ Ml ^ ^ w r l ^£3:^fn ^ « a> O O «* N 9 a o M 1 sscnIs 5l l5 is... “■“S »»**!Js i*S,ia3 S e Z X M S ilU--aas4*1*!= =-'..s; O 0 O Ml ^ •^gC = oi3ssSSSi !! S ^Sf55 5iM « i.*! m in •« w Ml in •X ^ Ml Ul > •Hss:. I ^ 4 O Ik Ml Ml M « CM S K ^ 4 M O Ml M Z sS M or « a XI 5|3|i^ ^ U w T “ - °*S|s'sISih , * i “ „ ^ O l< 4*il!f ^ Ml ^ ^ Mf r i §§5;fj a K « ^588?? SSuu^S ZS K isidi. 3“S^8* ^a=5s;u,sjK ^ Ml >. S O M M M S S - SS-- 3 rsai-, ^ M 2 « M £ T 5 ^ S < lA «-isJ•n ..j M M > rszii**, K N» M M ^ Z 2 Ml Z Z M s • a a ^ 4 |5 |«- SS :^53 sign" 1 u _ a a Lfi s ni3!f ^ Ml a a ^ Z 1 u u »• a •n 8 5 2 O *M Ml »- ss!?£i O Ml ^CM in <n m a JJSSSv ssM;:2 o X u ^ "*■’§18^5 a a 2 7 >•SS->8aS CM a ^ ^ a a M a a a a •n o ^ -1 CM Z I Ihl i|ii lUS a 4 Ml il|i ii=la a Ml li|i sg.i S*s:?a a Ml|5l il:ia > s ipi il:la > Va a MliM a ASSOCIATES. INC. (U40 plying CLOUDDAIVE M1O030 LAMOSUNvrront COCM ffuunic. MMl MM3 dRTinCAn OF SURVIY Strvvv Fo»-C.LJt'-h _Je #191 - ‘“.’r . * \ . • .-•. .TK- NORTH acAts (••SO'r^VW*» ca !/£»«- )i<?!//Pto 2.TOO eT7*-ff-_ SPiC/nG 1110 t0mi >rfOil ..^4< A amssatk. pc. CAPDARE'.LE i ASSOCIATES. INC. 5440 FLYING CLOUD ORIVE 041-30X LAND SURVEYORS EDEN PRAIRIE. MINN. 55343 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY , •£>• / Survey for: Book 3Q9 pm» _fr_h.Kl I ©w. e-i - Z”>Oo £r>+rw 2SC>-SS>o' zo/^e r - /90'>^/5Z3»/S;o<50 s.'C. .30 '•^ fVOoo »• c P. *4C.<Attou3er^ . /-l^^Sir 2^./ AVy.O *BS>'-I 20 V 2 0 'Voo X)e<>V^ /2- A2-C> *Z.HO C^#OC_ 'V Zo "30 ^r«o< •' Y A/O VO ^^rJC D«-j A-^ / S “2Z^ :: Pv2> /o> ••30 2.^3V 3 //r-=-^ - /"S*"? f^Sof*arc^ 6€^e<- <i_2_ > •'/SV - ^2.^ 2ZW - c-.2-‘^ 2-VT/O ol ^ ~ IS', f /c Lctt C jd ’j&zj^e" - SsV VoDf ayo - /^. 2. To Q>c /r-ooro ‘RtoPcXet^ >^/ncy^S r ^'a/z ' - Cff^iieyCiL. No-no^tn t,'tci7r^C=> /2.2'l'*AZr’ - Zf c!c^ loiff —2^*7^20'^ *^^^^;//r;ooO -/7,3 /4 " 2,*^ ' ^... - er-7-*r*“’ —'sc*'^ -/^i"y* “ t_* •’/. 0 L^. m ■’tf,-?rX^ 3 3 9^ U-^ li^^a I r' -J^mi oc• 1 1 J &wtTlii^ v4^' ■*■' z 1 “1 ."-41 V/J ~ct —rf- ■ II y'<\ Sv M- • ‘v*’. -uv:. Mf jrmfor \*i**J. ''1'iic‘i, r»*»»{n« •« vt^'Vr !»"•. #1S7 V: '*iir? Vwwn* Vnrj.-iijco • l/»t \n*« *; Ynitl Tor to *i.i«Con ‘V*r’in*' •‘tmctiir* •|t*»0Mr:i lot kIJt cnoiHi, it i5 5till 5t£wtaouanl .*» it ttoesi not ntt the rinif^vi 1/2 ncir ;wi. ft.) .'irr;i. T?iis lot only 15,001 on. ft. In nrcn. Tlio oxi-ttlnj! «fn»ctn"'.* i5 non-conforrint: in tint it doeo'not mvt the front ynr\l >*«»t»*.ick miuirtr*^* of .*i’ .in*’ <i«fo vnnf «ctlv»clL rmuifmpnt of lo*. Hie .*MHon'« nn* rrqiio.«tinr* norvwnl for .m mLlition to thin exintinf otiyeture. "'ic pfwio)»r»l mUition houIJ !lhv tio offi*ct vn t!ic front »*anl wthock. Tho mUltlon siriitil, iiowi'trr. mintnin tfH> 2.5* \*nr.' <<oti«ack. 1Ticrrfoir« tno varinnccii hoiili! he necc9<«ar>’: 1. Stfucttirr aii<lifio*t to .i lot t'nt i.« o.r.'t'i m. ft. too sinill in arm. 2. *hlntain 2.5' v.m? !<ot!*a«k Khlch I:* 2,2* nlvort of requireil |rt* wthaci. T^te twnne to tiie nortit i« tncaiiNl 55* frnr t*tc .icn^nn atnicture Mhldi in flileqjiiate frr** tV safely <«taneK»in* the allc>* lo never \*acitei1 for any oHier (iMltimo. 7o otvn thi< alte\' for te»e ••wtl,! re^Miire tV nfwal of ahorit 4 larye treen in the allcy*»'ay. ^ir nlat t!M*-M» tvo fnt!« a« cort!*lor‘tl, h«f we «hoiilit confin thio Hefore faUnr action. puMtiNR omflSRM wrarnr.. Howt»<r is, ism amrovBl at nrayo Mi odAltlan «ohU only ko a continnatian of ontatlni tm fctlMck frw tlia narlk lot 11m la ooly 2.1', Urnhaunt ItMo. AltfM# ylaitoi allay locaiad htCMcn yiaya ftiaa nauM tand to yioHda tfca Moaaaary dla tanct hrtwtin ntmtmoa. The lot aim vartaneo mbb apiNMOi at no arf||oiol^ land in avalldhio fkr canaawlM. antaimmm 22, 19W ^iMtd warlaMtf at par riMoliii CiMltalon rindlmm Md inatractad ataff to emefc if vacation of plattad alloy Mold bo nm tMoflcial to City fkr ptoiot- votion of fxiitinii timo on nald alloy. ....A rLv.M.vr. carassiw »5nrri.'.-c iirin .vo\i?ajER is, 1976 - page 4 ^ic!r yard setback of 6*. She wanted setback to be the required 10*. Ron Crurdeen, neighbor to the north, was not concerned about the side yard setback. Hwever, he did c'^iect to the proposed location which woulu extend 15-20' closer to the lake than his hone. After their cwments were hcr.rJ, Qniivorvir Ikinlap stated that this natter would be continued later in the neeting and that Mr. Ortenblad tojuld he infomed of these concerns. N'om Kuclin, son of the applicant, was present. Tlie Zoning /‘J.ninistrator stated that the applicant is requesting approval to add a garage to the existing non-conforming lot Tlie cars, etc. that he is currently storing outdoors would new be enclosed. Per n>’ suggestion, he has agreed to rjiinta*n an 84' side yard setback, a 10* setback from his house and a 22' setback from his property line along Olive Avenue. Proposed parage would be 22* x 22*. F** proposed location would be ch.inpcd to meet side yam setback, the re.ar entrance to house would be obstructed. ii^oolley rovctl, Guthrie seconded, to appro\*e aeiri.ances so as not to obstruct the house entry and no other land is aiTilable. Motion - Ayes (5), .'lays (0). Mr. Jensen was present. He Is requesting approval for an .*kiJition to their non-conforming structure which docs not rret the front and side yard setback requirement. Tlie prrnoscd addition would haw no affect on Uie front yard srcli.ic.k; however, the sane 2.8* side yard setback vr*'' be luintnincd. Hank liihich stated that the unimproir* i^'ti-u alley hetween subject property and neighbor to tlit ..arth i*ruld tend to provide the ncccrsary dist.nnce between strictures. The addition wcxild be an improvement to the property. No otlier land i.s nvaihihic for exp.mslan. TWo lots arc combined. .. •.i r;"'dr-rc!'~n.ild secomletl, to ajqirove liL*crj3c of the n-ture of the lot. no other lanti is awilable, platted alley provides necessary distance between structures, no additional cncnvidinent .is proposed addition wr- Id only be a conrinu.ition of existing house lines. 'bti« - Ayes (5). Nays lO). Tlie Planning Cormission took .action on the following Work .Session items. Hie *.cninp Administrator stated tlwt the •fandalc*s are requesting .ippro\*al to add a 24* x 30* attached garage to tiicir e::isting duel ling. Tlie present tuck-iaider garage *«xxj Ii1 he used as a rccre.ition room. There vtjuld be no e*'r''*e in access. All seth.ick rewiiregents vtxild be met. •r-re is no way to expand lot. fsithric moved, ll.'mnah seconded, to recerrmd aporoval as m» other land Is available and all setback requirtnents •.ill be met. 'totion - Aves (5), Nays (0). WARREN 0RTEN*DLAD (Continued) •19S) EDIYIN KUGLIN 2314 aiADYHOOO RttAD VARIANCE - ADO GARAGE TO NON-OONPOfWI.NG LOT AND SIDE YARD G STREET SETBACK (•196) CURT JENSON 2700 ETHEL AVEJUE VARIANCE • LOT AREA 6 SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR ADDITION TO NCN-CafPOWL'C LOT (•197) ''•»r.r;o couTJCiL meeting held November 22, 1976 •ur pl.>t nap showa these two lots »» <>ut we should confirm this before taking action. Planning Comission Meeting - November 15. 1976 Recommended approval as ineJ**only be a continuation of e*i»ting house lines. Although, the setback from is only 2.8 ft., the unimproved platted located between properties the necessary distance between lot area variance was approved as no adjoining land is available for expansion. Butler moved, Welsh seconded. variance requests for Curt Ethel Avenue, per the Planning Commission ®' November IS. 1976, subject to of Lota 13 6 14. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Henrv Muhich, Building 6 Zoning . is requesting approval to add a 24 X 30 attach d garage to their existing dwelling. They have a tuck-under garage. Since X jg.this, I have not been able to contact the Hondale as to what their plans might be existing tunk-under garage. If P^J"® , include renovating the existing additional living quarters or recreation room, I see no big problem here. All setback requirements will be met, and is no additional la ’ ailable to increase either the let width or area. Planning Conmisslon Meeting - November 15. 1976 Recommended approval as no available and .ill setback requirements for the proposed addition would be met. Welsh moved. Butler seconded, to “PPJ®^® variance request for Cary f’SS Co^try Club Road, per the Planning .q.of November 15, 1976. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Page 14 VARIANCE 2700 Ethel Avenue (Continued) variance 1965 Country Club Road 1198 Gary Mondale H*nrv Muhich, Building 6 Zoning Administrator, S« ilch.rd K..v.ny, 3.25 Will be moving his drug store into the building from which the Super Valu Store is now vacating. Thr^identlfication pylon sign used by Super Valu is larger than permitted by our ordinance and also encroaching thr ront yard setback requirement. VARIANCE 3425 Shoreline Drive #204Richard Keaveny (Continued) -r.- T.- --j: ;0 COtTJCIL MECTIMG HELD HOVEMDCR 22, 1976 following variances would be required for approval: Page 13 VARIANCE 2314 Shadywood Road (Continued) 1. Lot area variance - 15*215 sq. ft. 2. Lot width variance - 35 ft. 3. Side yard setback - l*j ft. 4. Rear yard street setback - 9 ft. Planning Commission Meeting - November 15, 1976 Recommended approval of above variances as no additional land is available and changing proposed location of garage to meet aide yard setback would result in obstructing rear entry to house. Also approved rear yard setback variance as 22* would be adequate for parking off the right of way and location would provide necessary 10* between structxires. Butler moved, Welsh seconded, to approve the variance requests for Edwin Kuglin, 2314 Shady* wood Road, per the Planning Commission Minutes of November 15, 1976, subject to side yard setback not less than 5*. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Henry Huhich, Building 6 Zoning Administrator, v^/VARIANCE stat id that Curt Jenson, 2700 Ethel Avenue, is 2700 Ethel Avenue requesting a lot area and side yard setback for 1197 an addition on a non-conforming structure. Although Curt Jenson this lot is wide enough, it is still substandard as it does not meet the minimum 1/2 acre (21,780 sq. ft.) area. This lot is only 15,000 sq. ft. in area. The existing structure is non-conforming in that it does not meet the front yard setback requirements of 30* and side yard setback require ment of 10*. Mr. Jenson is requesting approval for an addition to this ex'.sting structure. The proposed addition would have no effect on the front yard setback. The addition would, however, maintain the same 2.8* side yard setback. Therefore, two variances would be necessary: 1. Structure addition to a lot that is 6,780 sq. ft. too small in area. Maintain 2.8 ft. side yard setback which is 7.2 ft. short of required 10 ft. setback, The house to the north is located 35 ft. from “.he Jenson structure which is adequate from the »afety standpoint if the alley is never vacated ■or any other additions. To open this alley for ■so would require the removal of about four 'arge trees in the alleyway. (Continued) V. ^ r It-® 1 1 (we) ^ Adjacent Property Oiracrs* AcJcnowledgcnent Forra ■ r'/' of ? print nameis)][print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at f-H -’.I P. »also referred to as Land Use % Application No. • 1 (we) understand that in executing this ac)cnowledgement, I (we) an (are) not as)ced to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) an (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. i/’f fit ^ // f f !t ' - • Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any Information that may assist tne City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building 6 Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. I (we) Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement Form M ^ y V ^ b. y lx \ y c. of 91 Ca <^ /1» iam<[print nake(s)i [print address) have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at r.-Vrri f- rs’C^lgo referred to as Land Use / Application No. /o^g . I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (ar*») not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the Improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor’s project or use requires Council approval. 3 Property Owner ^ ^ 1 ^ y ^ 0ba£e ——— 0 .1./^-70 Property Owifer -TJ P Date If you have any information that may assist the City in tne review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building « Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ■ 'y.' Adjacent Property Oiraors* Acknowledgement Pom (we) (^AfiO^ [print name(s j1 of '^±92AZhfJL-4£Lz^ Tprint address][print have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 3 l'J^0 ^ 7^^^_______ also referred to as Land Use Application No. « I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor’s project or use requires Council approval. Date 7 ('^,1/, - V^ Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building ( Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgeaent Pom X (we) >4 J O'/c ^ ^ of ^ ^/jr' C (print name(sjJ (print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of property located at P-VVrf»V also referred to as Land Application No. . I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgementf Z (we) (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or* requires Council approval. ty Owner 6^ -9 c) Date ^ *f/«3 » Owner Date /96 If you have any information that may assist the City in the revi this Land Use Applicationr please submit your comments to the Buildii Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planp^ ‘9 Commission Chairman Kelley Orono rj.anning Commissxon Members City Administrator Bernhardson Proa: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building t Zoning Administrator Oatsi June 15» 1990 Subjects #1549 t #1550 Rod Crawford, 4705 North Shore Drive Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance- Section 10.22, Subdivision 1: Lakeshore setback variance required. Applicant proposes the ® existing patio area located beneath a second story lakeside deck. Approximately 1/3 of the deck is located within the 0-75 p??tected area. If intensification of portions of the structure located within the substandard setback are to be alloweo, variance approval is necessary. Required ■ 75* Existing ■ 71' , Variance - 4* or 5.3% (112 s.f. of hardcover within the 0-75* setback area) Section 10.22, Subdivision 2: Excessive hardcover exists within the 0-75* and 250-500*. a. 0-75* setback area = 6,304 s.f. Allowed - 0 Existing ■ 413 s.f. or 6.5% Proposed - 212.5 s.f. or 3.4% Total Reduction ■ 205 s.f. or 3.1% b. 75-250* setback - 17, 873 s.f. Existing - 5, 132 s.f. or 28*7% Proposed - 4, 359.5 s.f. or 24.3% , . Total Reduction in Hardcover “ 772.5 s.f. or 4.4% No hardcover variance required. c. The entire house structure is located ^*^*1® average lakeshore setback line. Refer to Any Intensification or changa in the existing residence would technically require variance approval. Based on a site inspection, staff can «itb^?k detached garage is located behind the average line determined from the property to <^^® ®Ut of the once again to Exhibit D) and on existing house to the , property. There is no resident structure on the lot immediately adjacent to the west lot line. Zoning File #1549 June 15, 1990 Page 3 Options of Action Denial > If denied please refer to the necessary findings in the variance section of your zoning code. Approval - If approved the following findings and hardships may be considered: 1. The house was placed on property in 1960 prior to the current regulations for the development of lakeshore properties. 2. The original permit for house covered the lakeshore deck. 3. There is no visual impact created by the screened enclosure of the patio area because of the existing topography and mature trees that nurround the residence. 4. Applicant is reducing hardcover within the 0-75' and 75-250' setback areas. Staff has no recommendation for specific conditions except to ask for hardcover removals as proposed by applicant. Planning Commission may have others. Review of Conditional Dse Permit Application The City staff and the County reviewed the request for a loop driveway to facilitate safe access from this site. The County approved the creation of a new curb cut at the east end of the property finding that the steep topography of this property presented a reasonable and acceptable hardship based on the County's standards. Dave Zetterstrohm has contacted my office to confirm the approval of the County. Unfortunately, the staff has yet to receive written confirmation. Staff has had an opportunity to convey early review comments of Glenn Cook to the applicant and applicant has provided an amended plan. Applicant's revised plans now show the retain. wall in the west side yard with positive drainage being provided within the 10' west of the retaining wall. Cook recommended that the existing retaining wall that runs parallel to the loop road within the street yard be increarei in height approximately 9 to 10'. At this height the slopes be retained at 6:1 ratio. The side slopes at the east sid* j'vsr be increased to a 3:1 ratio and swale must be totally locat<Ki - - of east neighbors property. The City will require fencing at * *.e top of this retaining wall. Zoning File «I549 June 15» 1990 Page 2 Section 10.03, Subdivision 19: Conditional use permit is required for filling activities in excess of 100 cubic yards that have no connection with the construction permit to be issued for detached garage in street yard. Pill brought in to protect foundation/footings of detached garage would be covered unr*er the building permit. It is the land alteration for the installation of a new curb cut and turnaround drive that requires the conditional use permit. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit A1 Exhibit B > Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhib/t F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit I - L - Application - Addendum Property Owners List Plat Map Certificate of Survey Topographic Survey of Existing Contours Existing Hardcover Plan Proposed Hardcover Plan Hardcover Fact Sheet 0-75' Hardcover Fact Sheet 75-250* Retaining Wall Elevations Cook's Report Site Plan Review of Variance Phase of Application - Applicant proposes the screening of a patio area located beneath the second story lakeside deck of the house. The screened enclosure will have no impact on the adjacent residence because of the topographies, location of mature planting within yards and location of house in relation to adjacent homes. Applicant proposes an overall reduction in hardcover within the 0-75' setback area with the removal of existing stone walls and landscape areas found to have underlying plastic liner. Applicant's builder has been questioned concerning the owner's future desires as to the creation of a 3-season porch beneath the second story deck. Applicant's builder has advised that only a screened porch is proposed because applicant spends majority of the colder weather months in the state of Arizona and will only reside in this residence during the warmer summer months. As already noted above, the detached garage proposed within the street yard shall be located beyond the average setback line. The garage will be located 40* from the street lot line and 19’t-' from the west side lot line meeting all required setbacks. Hardcover within the 75-250* setback area was at 28.7 and is now proposed at 24.3. Approval of a hardcover variance within the 75-250* setback area will not be necessary. Zoning File #1549 June 15, 1990 Page 4 in fact where there is a drop of more than 30" to existing grade, fencing will be required at the top of all retaining walls. Upon the submission of detailed plans to the building Department at the time of construction, inspectors will call out where fencing will be required. Applicant's architect has called out that there will be steel mesh fencing at approximately 4' in height placed above the retaining wall that runs parallel to North Shore Drive in the street yard because it will be part of the fencing proposed by new owner to maintain dogs within yard. Such fencing has been located on the site plan (Exhibit L). Cook's report also calls attention to the steepness of the west access drive as it enters the right-of-way oC North Shore Drive. Concern is that in bad weather it may be difficult for a car to back out and up the slope to then seek access via the eastern curb cut. Once again we note that the specific owner is not planning to live on this property in the winter months and secondly, this kind of sl..'ping condition in driveways is quite consistent with the other lake homes in this neighborhood that are served from North Shore Drive. Planning Commission may consider some of the following findings in the approval of the conditional use permitt 1. The installation of the loop drive will provide a safer access to the County road. 2. Steep topographies within the street yard require land alterations/modifications to existing topography in order to provide safe and easy access. 3. Proposed filling project will have no impact on the axis*.•ng drainage nor on the adjacent properties. Approval will be subject to the following conditions; 1. 36" fenci-tg will be required whenever there is 30" or greater distance from the to^ of the wall to existing grade. 2. Prior to the City issuing a land alteration or building permit for the construction of retaining walls, a Hennepin County permit must be submitted to the City showing approval of the proposed grading changes within the county right-of-way. Zoning File 11549 June 15» 1990 Page 5 3. A separate building permit will be required retaining walls constructed on the representatives should consult Department to determine what type of information will be required. 4. A separste land alteration permit ‘>®. ."'^“^"uriM the proposed filling and grading on the si.e. the filling process appropriate erosion required and at no time shall applicant or applicant s representatives restrict natural drainage flow. id1 Q A-'CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USB APPLICJjJro r-j Q J fY PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address U^r.C A/a»tU. fX\l ^nRD/LQ.- - - - - - Property Identification Ktnber (P.I.D.) —^ ^ ..-i a ' Please attach legal description to application if not includcd^^>^ ► on required survey. _____________________________ APPLICANT f^rcmr\K Ke^accff Phone (home) f7^ ^ Name __________________Phone (work) -------------- Address ONNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) - - - - Name fipP CR/^iUP^O(^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Phone - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - ivr^r^p.»«« qo-> /y^gJD\/iL.Lg _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ City f=)(Q7irV^ zip_S5l23Z Date Property Acquired_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ (month/year) I (do) (do not) al%o own the adjacent parcels of land. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ fees - CONDITIONAL USB PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee , ,, pass*After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application _ _ _ _ $125.00 Residential accessory Use $150.00 Institutional (church# school, etc.) _ _ _ _ $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _ _ _ _ $250.00 Commercial/Induotrial Use y $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain ^ of i.Aesbor, _ _ _ _ PRO/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS^ Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation - - - - $175.00 Easement Vacation . , $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision ^ ^ ---------- $250.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) ______ $100.00 Appeals ______ Other - see fee schedule W^BSKHT dsb of property Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential DBSCRIPTIOM of request Describe request in detail: ^ther (specify) 2. required submittals 1. ^°®P^eted Application Fonn. Plat Map.3. 4. 5. 6. 7. T“pV/r^Thl=^ur^''ey" (VxT«in"a alt.ratiSns involve chinge, 1^ elev«lo'’n'’°«Vdeel eny other pereone you «lsh^otlMe5'of thVe^ppU^^^^ <>* The applicant and Property Owner mita^ remember that your application is not compltlS if'the**'h Pleasenot been included. complete if the above information has InitiflS*of°cie?icarstJff?®''*'^^*"'' Application is complete? APPLICAMT'S sighatore The applicant hereby Date requested by the Zoninq Admin/atrero^/®'^^*^® Information required or time not covered by original fee additional fees (staff in review of this application, incurred true and correct to Applicant's signature OtlHKRS SIGNATURE the best of his/her knowledge. JJr that the information supplied Date 5/jz <r/^/) and further conmlaaion rae'nfber»1*°«J!3® consultants, purposes ofi«v.stl^.tlon^n"v°.^,Tc")!I^^^^ Owsr-s signature Date JiSnifEEVE ”?.!’?''® »ubViVtVi?V„Vo‘7hVPlanning Commission ^^^y offices 25 days bef third Monday of each monVh* Ao^ollca?^«°“”^Meetings are held review meetings of the Plan‘"® P^««ent at all sc^ unable to attend a scheduiSd 2eefi^i ® Council, if an applicant S“J?f/^A®<^.®9ent attend in your pllce^lnVldvi^^^ to have0«ice of thi^ cJa;;rprior to the meeting. before the on the scheduled is . ------ an the Building « Zoning BARDSBIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DBSCRIPTIOII OF 0NU50AL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Reouirements:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within ISO* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach n separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMiaiTS OR A WORKING COPY (11” X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above Information has not been iaclod^. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the bes^of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature *—1~ ^Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification ofi thia,_re^est. owner's Signature Date \pplicant must have all submittals the City offices 25 days before the Planning Coeimission Meeting. Planning Cosnaission Meetings are held on the :hird Monday of each month. Applicants oust be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is tnable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an luthorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning )ffice of this change prior to the meeting. CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION #1550Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) '^ter-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address A/U h/Pw/fiT Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. PPLICANT fi-H'n: A^cb.// phone (home) ^^5- Fa^\CtC._____________________Phone (wor)c) ___ffffCitvi^rco^v; PfttLkc. 2ip:_£^:«^[^ NNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) 47^-~*9n~/"> Cfif^i4Jl=Oilr^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (work)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Address: Cityzip: ^ / Date Property Acquired __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _(raonth/year) ^ (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. RESENT OSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Ose of Property _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Residential _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Other (specify) __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ BSCRIPTION of REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $_ _ _ _ _ _ Describe request in detail: SrUffif/J llO /J(J/?/Ta TtX\^Tll)6^ 'EIANCBS required _ _ __ Eot Area ______ Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances ( Y Front _ _ _ Side _ _ _ Rear) Other H--' j 0 (ytJJaCtC 'y^Liu 62^ ->C<r<^. <S£^*i- iJ xi'c:, /f^c? <7 ^iCUcAjc A.s£^ S^ont c.^i/ -^7:,'S' ^\/-sit^ui, ^ ’C/Lt. (i^<2-/^-A<^ u£/ 't4> /^U/t CL^rr^-fiM. ~^jL*nnt^ >T3 Xl^~rK^p2t^/L. dAz '^ci^-*5**^' ^*liznfiox2ziuf^^ >.>€Uslc/ <sc ^ cZ^ \^^SjLU'tMJCt^ Cc^ c2u‘diy4^ ^46 l L^t J14/1^ ^^U^ZZ'K-^ 'ACcrr\tj, C<^K. ^^eu^A.xi.-Ti-^'C ■ ^h.jO-/ ,.lt^ C3tx/’ XC'^-PTXJ^ ^ «2^‘>7y6l^'<^, __<7vc^ S4td i7izAzJu.L4^. ^\^t2u, > ^O /y^ <^r)}t^xUc<J .„ Uj^^AL ciL^L^ u/i. t^i'uj ^^u4^^''-^A4 zA ujz^ Uy-ilt-A^ Ac u^ 2i^iyLZ. V/c-£. Lcz^t^ __dri'it.jTu.z^d.x^yJ 6Xjt rt __}JAu. ^'KiLCji^i^<C^ cjC^Siyt£.*z~tn^ ______ ^uA *-i-^ ^.yfV^^(AJ^ ._<-cAr» _*'^^ LH'i^-’Li^ . — -tf (Loxl^qM^ ^ U£-Ajla Ui^ 'Jo yia 'lA^ y.AK<A UzAj Aa. ^Lf- UTC'^JL JtX,n^_<7td-TlJL^.WjLtA^CC'^uAfiA ^ ^jt^JUjcA^ LctnAci AAiu^t yti ijC^.^cAziUL ^ALlUL UzAuuA, CW^^^Ae/-^ 6z. CcAui^7tu.-c^/utL.KA c/ u:^.^ da^n^zuru^ <^Jutx/7, (xj Uc - /c.*i CisctUud Cnz wct-^^ !r ^d^t.i^:_^ . irtXucJ^ C-uJ- <^H.i-^iXi^*i^ Z^'-^'*<-<-'‘i^ CLjLdbL^ Sd^tJ-'rn^^ '^C ~cc ^ ^ ojG.^-9^ ><3 UJUr^.AXAS.A'i^lKU^^ Pc^tA^^C-nJ S4^^4_/‘ ti/ ynt-A.^^ ^ yu^tA<.i^ ^ yi*^ <>^ '^<-i. a^:}'*^ (Xjt^A^- U.t>^^Ai^ tA>^ <u*^£^ UJUuU^ zAt iPdcL^l. CtUAtJ^ 'Vb yp,\^idLL '-AO ft. y}/^.4tMtn\^ VO/) cUjlJ CoL'^ ^ K^hcL'r^ CclcJLl^ <TuJy '-M.uJ' ,77^i^^ \<U<jujL^^C^ Ca7xu!j^ <->^ t a1 >j "turt ^rLt'u.L^- 2^0 lJl^ P\A,\.d (^-txstAJ c^iA y?naPUj^i<-^ {jLLnjJ^ cl^v^ n^'/U7tefju.*>^ <Jk-u.*i-t^ ?/3c ^ '"’■y^V^-'-^ 'f^ iJj^%J cuj^tz^t>n‘i^‘^ 'LA.aJ o-tL/'iJ yx/a-*r.A ^^hCuJtLct^. _______ Lf^ ‘Ct^eL/Ut.«:^A,4i4y _’vJ^ CuruJLci .'i-^-/n <rc/C-. — K.P>A£unJL Cjv^t.. '^^-1, (-^^'XjLAJ 'lAa^ ynaMfi^. ^ . * s icn Is II «SSS.SSSS8 S£<..SS s'llh Si w *S.J ^gSSscI iSS2j?'=-§* W O >A £ M ^ I I sijil I 2«=si| ”11'* f :Is*mui Is: s M rl.8-5* j -I*•s£i:s I# ly lu 9^ 3 S S M o ir S s-s e|S“ Mi! Is “^ sisS £CgS El»l:ss> BS-^ -SBB IS0 1 ! i : K = 5“ft 8|2 if|H;4 i«2* •’R“2aS il£ I s * L S || u u o S « u •* «ikm ^88.Zri:i*“e^isl22.1^2 «!(| o s!i|m 2 I s|«igS-- iiiia o ^ t 5i! ^ k i 1?! « j. % •: :• ^: ■t • • i M / •.-• • *■ ■ '• .*■ t»?;i:V.v it * A*>r*nrV.-,uy,f> s•• *• »•• - *-.•"•••• *^.; -.(wv*' • • • . V- - -•■ ■ ^ . • i , I HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (ciSCLE ONE)([oiZ5? 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone A. House B. Garage . c. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/ Deck F.Landscape areas UNDERLAIN BY •. . PLASTIC SHEETING LENGTH WIDTH __X _ X — X — X — X — X — X _______ X _________ J5»i ft y .ft‘% G. Other 'I '** _ X 771 Total Hardcover ih Zone Total Property Area in Zone I G-^ l-.-.S _ S.F. _ S.F. . S.F. . S.F. . S.F. . S.F. . S.F. . S.F. . S.F. . S.F. . S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 0 S.F. fi" 2] ^ I » 4 in X 100 - , y:.?- -^ H' HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) (j-75j^75-250* 250-500’ 500-1000’ SirriMwc Hardcover in Zone A. House s LENGTH WIDTH B. Garage . c. Driveway . X X X X X X X D. Sidewalk •. Patio/ Deck F.Landscape areasUNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING - X _ X _ X _ X 6. Other _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ X_ _ _ _ _ _ Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone [T)_L'.i.S_4- (IJjli2±. ■ “2-. S.F. . S.F. . S.F. . S.F. . S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. i| 2- .. S.F. _ S.F. _ S.F, _ S.F. _ S.F. _ S.F. _ S.F. S.F. U S.F. fil ^ f %X 100 HARDCOVER CALCULATIOH WORK$HE-i SETBACK zone: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* ^75^^50-500' 500-1000* Existing Hardcover in Zone A. House ^ - LENGTH WIDTH B. Oarage . c. Driveway X —— X _ _ _ _ __ X _ _ _ _ _ X _ _ _ _ _ X.Jl±L±. X _ _ _ _— 0. Sidewalk . X _ _ E. Patio/ Deck & F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other ^ *- - - - - Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zoh- . I ^7:3> I AT. ^ IT^TL _ S.F. . S.F. . S.F. . S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. [a ] S.F. HI 0 si^i> j.[T|±lg2^__* 100 ^ hardcover calculation worksheet . SETBACK WNE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 250-500' 500-1000 lilSSSSrllAROcovEa IN Zone ^ A. House _ *1- • LENGTH HIOTH B. Garage . c. Driveway D. Sidewalk - - - -x- - - - Patio/Deck F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY • . PLASTIC SHEETING Z> \-J*9 « I 6. Other Total Hardcover in Zone - Total Property Area in Zone n OfO 3 lo \o*y _s _s _s u>^_ X __s s ' 'J ft T^_ S 4[T]X 100 - JZdlL B B % «r1 Vl bi U\ t If uii \ 7a '51 \ \ ^5 7 6u\ M ,b J ® 1 hfi j U\ d£ S3 I" 40 uii L J ff fi0 Z =3 7 0 VV\ \ 1 < < v5 7 7 r».» ,fc 'i- 3t 0 0» G te>vm »f •Mn M juynr C »r Wj^v*- i ior^ »€ »<«v«3 £ »t j*-»» c rw" G»«' • C jc * »l I '*>n H fcwG ►! V k" « «»r< • OaOBf *f •<njK| A' (out * *1 Odom IC Iu <}*«I 'i ,»»% • ^XfOar »( VUr* * •s«r«r- »» >3« *«oI »t Vtc'JK ' »*w£“jr»< »l ( »<>*^ »l O ;£veu »« rnofnti A »r»Tir »i Mt-jrC »l ijm « w«kr«i ff Wjrt I «3#i »( *-M-T C Kl»« « * '•w*-. C »I "CM k W a bnAM AC Ojtw i l-»J»“«n »l VL*« A >o *f »»•« J CAf^ »! m--tr Vjrtrjri »€ Mjn 0 *»»t A| riw^M • AnariO" A G«> > »l M»tl »l . *>v<c iGjw* s Af •f-'* C A>A»J>t •< A ^jnAI W »»» *‘CA jf~y O A*rBtf A| CrtMi C-»*» Af C'-rW A (•VtKA* uo M Mtrjn M Owr Bones troo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers A Architects June 13, 1990 City of Orono Box 66 Cryitsl Bay, Minnesota SS323 Attn: Jeanne Habusth Re: 139-1349 Rod Crawford Dear Jeanne: Ue have reviewed the proposed construction of a garage and circle driveway at 9703 North Short Drive. The grading shown on the plan provides for 2:1 side slopes. Ue would recoaaend slopes no steeper then 3:1 and preterably 4:1. This will allow for maintaining the slopes properly. The toe of slope along the north west side of the lot should start I foot off the property line. The slope above the retaining wall should be 6:1 or flatter to allow for maintenance. Ue would recomend that design details for the wall and revised profiles along the top and bottom of wall be provide. The height of the wall may require a fence or railing for safety. The driveway profile between the new garage and North Shore Drive will be very steep. Ue would expect that this will result in difficulty In backing out of the garage in the winter. The easterly entrance onto North Shore Drive allows better sight distance than the westerly entrance. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERLIK i ASSOCIATES. INC. Clenn R. Cook GRC:dh grc/39 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul. MInn-sota 55113 • 612-636-4600 Planning Conunlssion Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson /f From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Admii istrator Date: June 13, 1990 Sobject: #1552 Renee 6 Steven Foster, 1800 Shadywood Road - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IC, Single family lakeshore residential, % acre, sewered Application - Request for hardcover and lakeshore setback variance for construction of a walkout/patio/hot tub area on lakeside of house. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit K - Application Letter of Request Plat Map Property Owners List Survey with Staff Notations Proposed Lardscaping Plan Hardcover Review Resolution #1908 Pertinent Pacts - 1. Applicants are proposing to excavate for a proposed walkout door on the lakeside of their existing residence. In conjunction with that walkout excavation, they propose to construct a walled patio below grade, with steps leading back up to grade. A portion of the excavation is in the 0- 75' setback zone. 2. Applicants also propose to expand their existing entry step at the west side of the house. 3. Applicants' initial landscape plan also indicated a stepping stone sidewalk along the right side of the house. This was dropped after applicants discussed the hardcover history of this property with staff. 4. This lot was granted a lot area and width variance in 1985. Conditions of that variance limited the property to 25% hardcover in the 75-250' zone. A house and site plan was submitted which met those conditions and the house was constructed. The purchaser of the new house, James McNaughton, requested additional hardcover to make the driveway functional. A further variance was granted to allow up to 35% hardcover. A review of the hardcover in June 1990 indicates that the existing hardcover in the 75-250' zone is 40.5%. It is apparent that McNaughton constructed driveways larger than was strictly allowed by Resolution #1908. Zoning File 11552 June 13, 1990 Page 2 of 2 5.Existing and proposed hardcover is as follows: 0-75': 75-250** Allowed 0 35% (3421 8f) Existing 2.0 ■*.<. 40.5% (3950 Proposed 2.3% (133 sf) 42.7% (4170 sf) hardcover on the property would seem to be questionable. The Doarent reason why hardcover currently exceeds 35% is nara- cover removals might be considered, on this matter. The City has denied many requests for ™s2d 75* 7one to create wallcouts in recent years. D°«s this proposea eLavated patio area fall into a'^Jor^ir^vlty run^o^ this a unique case? Staff Recommendation - Please review the attached '.’‘"ibits, and if possible view the site. ?°:;l ”e°d by a hardship or'^ un^que sIfr£\Vt".!“'pl.V"nTn,%S:»”Ti*^^^^ !lv^e°rr,‘ -ns'riten'rwrt^ th°e '^r.V’pTlc^'’n^7 t*o\%vi'’si‘S!;i;i =p!::^^^^°arlVaVy‘?r:J^n^^%r^^^^^'st?u^cU or retalnln, wall. Within the 0-75’ zone. CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial A5 plication Fee S175.00 7 / ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee SIOO.OO (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION iite Address lYon vot> ^ X ^ ^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) / i'jrr O h '2^ 01cm ii ___iriiUl'r-iHiiiK iQJ .cool *<V* 05/25/90 Attach legal description to application required survey. APPLICANT Name ^ TTyr^J FA/* ^/ Address: ONNER (if different than appl- Name_ _ _ _ _ _/•' • ^ / Address: Date Property Acquired_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ I (do not) also own the adjacent PRESENT OSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Use of Property _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ •1 on *//• t. rcu I . / r 1 '*• 'II .ith/year) .and. /Residential Other (specify) DMCTIPTlM’orMQOKT Eatimat«l Construction Cost ---- ■ £! f, J-Jr,/j .1- Describe request in detail : k, A/!//' A/J/A ..Vi- VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances (_ _ _ Front Other _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Lot Width >A Hardcover Side _____Rear) DUtDSHIPDescribe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; jj;_ ' 'T> H ^ r Jt DESCRIPTION OP DNDSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements; 4—_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR_ _ A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour variance application is not complete if the abo^ infomafcion has not been included^ •• mm mm mm mm mm ^m mm mm mm mm mm ^m mm ^m mm mm m ^m <^m mm mm mm mm mm jrtification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff;_______________________________°ate__________________ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE . The apolicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff vime not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and corr^t to ^e be^ of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature _ _ _ _ _ _Date — fliiMgfig SI6HAT0RB The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and fx^ther authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this requMty, Owner's Signature ..-^3^^.._ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date ^ Applicant must have all subt^ttals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting* please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. i / ' 1? iOi>;^ „J/V^ «a_ „S-0JU^^*'*-^'''^^ aS-^-C\A- ~ o-'-. '<3U«a-y^-rVX-> ^t' ^ (J^ CX^d^X/'^^ d-4d^ Ou AJ lA<j^ .^yO-u- ./ / / 7,^ Jo~au\AjeuvuJL- ''t.jL.A^uyjuiX^^cx.,^ <y^i£^^t^ -At^-^ cAiL/JL^ ^ J^Ak, I^A a- ^ ^ H-^_<X,et<'r^ ^x A^» 7C^L- -^-KT" c^\-<3.x^ TL^A o^ c A loj-^km^ .>tAjA6L —cX-^A^-t^yxJx^iJyu^ oA^a^eA^ ol^x.'k.AA . &tt>y—' os M g I ^ivi .•^ • 1 »• I >|-f?i^/;^ br</s ^c^ot>jM\o(Jry S- 3e\otO—^-^f- iAX.ltoof- AJ c i r*^ r, <5 Ht> e^€vri^ e^tn^ f^tyfem^s D - toArAe>L.c UtJiT \ L, ec.4«^ bk^ikifj Sy5TX4l i^/cc. <&£, t/Stt <Sr«4441 AAjLJ^. ^iCm;/aJ A^£. u//«Jt. T C S ! F . ^ •'? C * •:*• *. '*• ’ .*• f'•••V. L'.x r ;*^ ‘rf-v.r.T-1 •,- y-*• -• ••* •. -^ » r, , , . , . ■•••%■••• ■•■ • ' ••- .. -V • f- •V * •.. ’ •■ * . • • *m ' *,4 •' •• • r ■ ' % • , t • ^ ■. •••••••• • • '• - « — r • A • 1 •' t « •*» ; >;■ • \•> . ., ••• »V ••V, W9 '« • -•• « • ( * • / •** '. ,rv ‘ Tt • *< '-7 :/••• *> • •** V- • • . '*'••* * * •'. . •>**■'- . .• • f' - ji"it rtn‘* •■“ st>tef' s4x/ ~ * . .* .« A«» «•' * • .* * ' * * * * ’ . * .’• . • • . ‘ J,*^ *•.,, ..f i, .* ^ •*** »\ •*••*' •* *• ■'-•*••* .’'rf#* •- i, •’, VV**"*'*• ••' '*;v'' •’ /"-/o iHE.iiiiiiiiiiltlMflLi^. ii i •' •' '<0 ) -*•••• 'V «*“ City of OROrVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 190 8 2. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval# or this variance will expire on that date (January 13, 1987). 3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of January, 1986. Hallii>/7City /Clerk Cc^—• M^y C. /Butler, Mayor Im Adams^Acting Mayo Property ^T.a / Page 3 of 4 I 1 / City of ORONO .. .. . VI.. f . ■ \\ •' • : - •.• . * • • I • J t * ^ 0 •• 'i I ^ . V •. : RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1908________ D) The applicant's claim that the "grass paver" mono-slabs proposed by the builder are not suitable for Minnesota's severe climatic extremes, and will suffer frost heave and plow disturbance, is a valid claim to the extent that failure of such a system would potentially cause damage to applicant's vehicles. In addition, the permeability of- -the "grass pavers" has not been demonstrated under continuous usage conditions. E) Applicant has a valid hardship from a safety standpoint in .’•equesting he be allowed to have a backup pad so he does not have to back out onto County Road 19. F) The requested 75—250' hardcover of 36.4% is not exceptional but is similar to many other properties along Shadywood Road. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this prooerty are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the appli cant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Cede and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLOSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to tne Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the paving of a driveway and backup pad whxch will increase the hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone to not more than 35%, where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, subject to the following conditions: 1. The driveway, backup pad, house, and other hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone shall not exceed 3,421 s.f. or 35%. Page 2 of 4 I ' .. 1 . ; t • • ^ V' *.•• . .* City of OROrVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1908_________ H- A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 FILE #996 WHEREAS, James McNaughton (hereinafter "the applican^t") is the owner of the property located at 1800 Shadywood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 21, Shadywood (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 o permit the paving of a iriveway and backup P?f «hj=h 25% 75-2So“terd- 75-250' laJceshore hardcover -co 36.4%, exceeding the 25% 75 25 cover normally allowed. Minnesota; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #996. 2. The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family Lalceshore Residential Zoning District. 3 The Orono Planning (-:ommission reviewed this application on D;cember 16, 19?5, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings; A) This property was granted lot area and Variances per^Resolution #17i8-A on January 14, 1985. No other variances were granted at that time, , tions of Resolution #1718-A specifically noted that all improvements must meet City requirements, and 5.250' cover must not exceed 2.280 square feet (25%) m the 75 setback zone. B) Upon approval of the building permit for I'reTJLnc^cn the property, .\\Vr44rsqS«eof lot area by the surveyor which would allow 2,444 squat feet of hardcover in the 75-250' setbaclc zone. C) The house was constructed, and gravel installed in excess of the hardcover J ^^3®^ of the Excelsior Design, prior to applicant s purcha property. , - ,Page 1 of 4 ='tkV IMu. •*V'.'****•’••* f ,rso»» hmllo >uiP>EPv i»ir. IbiJJ !rti54 THE Cl TV CP QRDO <;i:?-U77-7?57 C75 • HARDCOVER CALCUWflO.'J WORKSHEET ssmcK 2o«e: (crRccs onf.) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' Existihg HAADCovgrt in Zone AI H ouse LfHGTH J/l __X Po WIDTH z/ X zy «.s X________-----------------------“ S.F. •------------;--------- ^ —------------------■------------- S.f. B. GARAflg 'I^xclaLrJ. x . * r--------------------------------------s.x, j, c. D riveway S7^S‘ x /V.fT . a.,/ - X !(p'S m \ ■■" 1 V 0. SideWalk '-^_ X X 2 ___j/, w ^/ /2ci ^•JjANDSCAPC /Lkig, X undsruin BY V PLASTtC SHCEriNC ys'fz • —^3 O %.p.^ • -—'H-Zo s,.", ■ :---------$,F. 2_0 ------X S.P. s.p. S.P. Ay.vT^ a. Othir _ Total H ardcover in Zone - V*7/^/ 7^a » fX) ^ Total Property A rea in Zone - | fll H!SJl7QL2£^\T\J^imL X100 -% ^77 y 20 /!'<: VCKiOiM/AJA-70/C. i s>.v // A 9 <~!lo/ ~ ^6> A vy s/o/vi^ To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: May Hr 1990 Subject: #1533 Richard and Julie Marklund - 3415 High Lane Sketch plan of a two-lot residential subdivision Zoning District - RR-IB, Two acre, single family, rural residential, unsewered Application - Sketch plan request for direction for a two-lot residential plat to create one additional building site List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Letter of Request Exhibit C - Survey Exhibit D - Plat Map Exhibit E - Topographic overlay from City files Exhibit F - Topographic enlargement with additional information added by staff Exhibit G - Wetland air photo (1970) Exhibit H - 1989 air photo Exhibit I - City Engineers Recommendation Discussion - The applicants request consideration of a lot split to create a new 3.5 acre lot from the southerly half of their property. They propose to access this lot via an easement driveway fronm Christine Drive rather than by creating a driveway outlet. The driveway would cross proposed Lot 1, over which the Marklund's would grant a driveway easement, but leaving Lot 2 with no actual public or private road frontage. (Exhibit C) This proposal raises numerous questions regarding access, future roads, and viability of the building site; 1. Refer to Exhibit F. Recall that the recent Ducharme subdivision proposal adjacent to the east, was recommended for approval with a 25' private road outlot along its west boundary common with the Marklund property. This was intended to provide for future connection between High Lane and Christine Drive with the remaining 25' to come from Marklund's property, for a total 50' width. Ducharme's have never gone forward to the Council with their subdivision proposal. Zoning File #1533 Page 2 May 11, 1990 2. If Christine Drive was continued directly east through the Kreb and Marklund properties to connect, this would split Marklund's proposed Lot 1 into two parcels, each less than 1 acre. Additionally, the 25' of additional right of way corridor along Marklund's east lot line would cut through the end of their house. 3. Per Exhibit I, the City Engineer is now recommending that Christine Drive be continued east and southeast through the Marklund and Ducharme properties. This would appear reasonable topographically, but leaves Lot 1 short of 2 acres. Glen indicates that there will have to be a cooperative effort by Ducharme and Marklund for this to work. 4. Does the Planning Commission have any inclination to approve the proposed subdivision without an access outlet? Further, does the Planning Commission have any inclination to approve such a subdivision without designating an access corridor to the east via an outlet? 5. In staff's opinion, the resulting lot from the proposed lot line will be extremely limited as to house locations, since the area of suitable slopes for the probable mound system and alternate site leaves very little area in which to construct a house. My sense is that the mounds would likely be in the area of 6-7% slopes (See Exhibit F). There also may be some concern about a drainage way in the east half of the property affecting septic sites. FinaJ ly, an alternate site for Lot 1 must be found, but slopes averaging 18% south of the house raise some doubts as to whether this is possible. Staff RecosMendation - Planning Commission should address the following issues: 1. Access allowable via easement rather than outlet or flag lot? 2. Provision of outlet for future access to the east? Where? Does the road have to be constructed new? 3. Substandard area of Lot 1 based on Engineers proposal? 4. Alternate drainfield site for Lot 1? Viable building site for Lot 2? Please also review the comments of the City Engineer, Exhibit I. r p CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION AFP PROPERTY LOCATION imm aam Site Address B>S\S I-aLong Lakg^ 5S3S(q 1350200000 01 0& 150.00 u ft Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) OS-IH-X^ /Jv QQ17 COOl /lOl fliiO^ ‘''04/i7/yv Please check one - Property ^ abstract or . torrens? Attach legal description to application APPLICANT Phone (home) *-t'7S-~3'SC8 ^ Name IR.rKnr-^ Uark(uy\A Phone (work) Address; 4UqU LdY\f._ _ _ _ _ _ City; Lnke^ Zip; ONNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City;Zip: (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USB Number of Tax Parcels Development Size 5.MS M.YrciAcres Dry Land Mk Acres Wet Landi .0 ^ Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check)X Residential; no. of units Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Division for Tax :?urposes X Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: I Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) J_ _ _ Units per Acres A M<] A’ Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land _X—Residential Other (specify) ■ NINIMOM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 2. 3. 4. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Apolication is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) $150.00 250.00 250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) 300.00 + 20.00/Lot Pinal Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Date Date * Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. I • • JticharcC a. narftCuncC 3415 Hi^h Lane Long Lafe,e, ntnnesota 55356 4/26/90 City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN. 55323 ; / rIT I y\ * • :• 1 /O O To The Attention Of: Orono Planning Commission Dear Planning Commission Members We are submitting a Sketch Plan Application for your general comments and recommendations. We currently own approximately 6.49 acres on which our primary residence is located. The address is 3415 High Lane, Long Lake 55356. A Sketch Plan prepared by Mr. Mark S. Gronberg is attached for your rcviGW. Our proposGd plsn is ds follows, dndthG explanations are keyed to the alphabetically or numerically marked items as follow: 1. We would divide our existing acreage into two parcels marked as 1 and 2. Parcel 1 would be two plus acres and remain our primary residence. Parcel 2 of approximately 4.49 acres would be offered for sale as one parcel / single residence site. 2. We would request that access to parcel 2 be via "OUTLOT A" (marked as "A") which is located in the Betz Division and currently is connected to Cristina Lane. We would arrange for an appropriate easement from the edge of "OUTLOT A" through approximately 15 feet of property owned by Mr. A1 Kreb, 3445 High Lane ( marked as "B" ). We would also grant an easement for a private driveway through our property (parcel 1) marked as "C" to provide access to parcel 2 and a building site in the general area marked as "0". 3 "E" indicates the property directly to the west of ours which is a residence constructed by Mr. Tom Betz in the Betz Division, and currently for sale. 4. Mr. Steve Schirmers of SP testing has reviewed parcel 2 and believes that soil conditions will be approximately in line with those found in the Betz Division directly adjacent to parcel 2. i * -4 ' •iT .V'-Z.^ 5. Parcel 2 is mostly fully wooded. ■O We appreciate your consideration of our Sketch Plan and look forward to your comments and recommendations. inceciel Richard and Julie Marklund ] (?<v»e -• m ■ f;| ^if-i M\\ (0iv <« (:•?\^.- c^; — y ^ 1 >.r *n ^ ' ;> i • ‘ •^.i ft-*'Oej^ K-r/f lA:,'pit q<^ I- 'M ■ m ■■ ^.• r •iT*‘ •*n. • % —— A ^ I - ^ O**^ *■ • kJL\ ^ m .' ;/c; .ll/vf' I Wmrn -rr t- . K* ZONING FILE NO. 1533 CITY OF “0"“ OF FLMnmWS COMMir,SIOB ACTIOH Siy«al’‘Bly, MN 55323 473-7357 _______________ TO: Richard 6 Julie Marklund COPIES TO: 3415 High Lane Long Lake# MN 55356 ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ TYPE OP APPLICATION: Sketch Plan Review _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE OP MEETING: 5/21/90 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against Planning Coanission reconaends the following: Table for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Applicant was not present. .tart... 7.00 p* by the Planning Commission. Please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357) if you cannot appear at the June 18th meeting. J '#-1-5-3 3 ' ; I"v mV - ^ ^ <'! .1^ yf\ NT J "■WW.i>:iri |f - 'Wi • :'‘-rr "• v.\ i-t ■ 'f . kct -V mits • s f; ■■, ,..'| w JC WM'^m’ ' i-‘ • * f. ^ >w'. v> * *** *Tv \ ^ V ^ V , • «• V' t f A fimi* * 4i*^J'TiT i ^ ■ ■^l ' ■ ' ’’4" , tp fU '"S' ^ T-'> ’§« f|rt.^5 u » «i -.'■7 1 mmmliS3^«SS,^r"f'J!lV ‘:k IT Bones troo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects Otto G 8on«tfOO PI Rotjen W Bojene PE jown C Anoertk, PE 6 Turner PE j^mei C 0»son PE Glenn R Coot. PE E No>^ PE Roew G 'jcrturcnt. PE Wjrv>n c PE «Crth A Goroon PE P<r3fd W fouer PE Oona<0 C Eurg^rdt. PE ^erry A Booroon P£ \Ur« A Hjnion P£ TeO K F<t3 PE VticrMei T Rjutminn. P£ Pecert » PW?ene. PE D^4Ki O LOIU3U. PE. Tfx)r»vw W Petenon PE c PE ^arres P VJind PE P *no^v>n PE P ScJt\ PE Pcoen. C PuVkP* A I A Tnornji c *r<)ut PE HowatJ A SjrVon PE Djre* ; Eigrron PE A 5<?a. PE PfMO J Cdi^^ PE Mjrii O WJftl PE Thcmji ff Anoervyi A IA G^ry E Py*4naer PE M.w 9 ie^ien PE L Pn.«o G'^vef «l PE A E'<Bion Leo M P^^*tky M Oiior^ Suijn M E^enTn C PA May 14, 1990 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Re: File No. 139-1528 Marklund Dear Jeanne, Ve have reviewed the proposed Marklund Subdivision. We would recommend that a roadway Outlot be taken across the property for the future extension of Christine Drive. This will require cooperation between the Marklunds and the property to the east. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE. .VNDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:li 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 •. <• -., -p-th .i»_vo:r.7?-n V lU WML A«P <N4iNC« *m PC««A rott '^:im i of Lot 21 , SHADY-WCX)D H«nn«pin County, Minnesota »*wiM, riLLiiMU, UHADINC ^ REDGING, TREE REMOVAL OR* ‘'INSTRUCTION OF ANY KIND I tiaamli I- fl 9^ SHORELINE i no.oo'0 *y \ WiTHiXaS FT OF ANY WETLANOS PERMPte are requireo for •• D»^KS.>EAWALLE!kRIPRAP §‘'''C TXBor - X % \ I •^- 3J.W ttif X’ SIM' •» * ■' /7 \ V. ,istv» -------^ \ \,emsnt^ . CMnOf XTlP lot HEGB «■ I547A sf 75* tD 250’ W- 9774 sf '• t; •jraby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries 21, SHADY-WCX)D, the location of all existing buildings, if any, thereon, and the proposed Ation of a proposod building. It does not purport to show any other improvement or encroach- ks.. 2J> l«! 1 lni*h m fmmt- COFFIH « GRONBERG. INC. - n I -d .A 4 |: I, ■3rr-*:;« U '^’riV'O »fcr wr» -^y/ fle.'SKsa \n‘<£iK ./1% -P.*,.:9 ;■ ^ ^ »..^•^ -T*"*""* p ' . MAW •■ rgaLSW-^*' .JU ,jrf .■* ^A*"- «u^£c'%au , ? .vf ■■■«TM« «w »*m Vp j etp •«Pi« '»m.r 0*^^** ^ ^ ^ .--■ .^"1 “•r^ JCflO ift r ^s^trar-i V-►i*%'--'V .-p-A#. ;■ :t^ ®5»'~-9s& IKUl-£%U; I ••" ~;^rrAT ie^pa'Y-'n — l-V’S-Y V--.- 1 V:AjX:*d_ r M<« *Mt. ;T'jfe7»ju< —jA \ \ iasa?.»« ,}a.-«;a.r , I'M- »h:;w»U« •PH V-A:f»r *imHi 1‘ «A% «U<M "W e« ••UXA'^ frf a'^'w.Ti' iiS > vitj AC), A*«A6 »:w;yMK} ATT(« «t*^**«. to 9««iPlAi, 6«AOC •plA-A.^ TH*r» c . PiMB p*>«ap< c*fo C*9<BAI Plow a«t■ M p*o IW P«0 “P't« VmM - ^0* J*£. 8mE KAH PWJAM PL AN « StCTlONa rttr « •• ^TTBWSSBFTBHBnBB mCTROPOllTfin UJfi/T£ comROL commi//ion i^T****W«r£R STATKjN aMPROWEM£NTS M 449 onow k mmtngrH t *• 09M00tnT yimj ^«r .. ._4_.../'_. L p*'^.l__ 'V mr»0 M0*c. 0m».i * ir4Si.t 1 SIS'_____ ______ t/0'r cm»kt\ mt-rm r<*,* •- *» • * , fm»MtMirtra utort !^’ j0(i9 , ,00m cm»tt$ noHi. M 'H-M# rrt <»r» t-t"* ritg 00 00^0 V mfmttMtmitrtm i/wor* 01*1000 x;sv^^ l0m,0»C^ 0 ’u 100000 "•*0 0*4-n 0t 10000 a 000 — ratr §0 01 ‘.a 00.t f00M0i. t.m Art0 A' 0m$ 000>*0 i’-rr iTmr.0m (--Atg) <*‘• <‘0 n 0f '•*« A0AM09mt0 00- 0t^*A. 0f tgt*0mt00%0 *00 — 0 —$ , #w«4^ M A00A*m0g0 **l*m A0-000*g0 m* .—0*et. 0t I f.-tm 0*0 —•Ai, MVfMMMi- W *r m. ^000000* W*0000n Miar g>* «r«wM« A 10*0 r<MW«N 00 AA0 000 fmg 000 000 t00€g0J0»0 (jyi) mmnt, 0000 /■ f LCcrmCAk TTW^JWIWPPW .>-----♦-.. 4-^., -t-t ■''.ra-> ■ ttgt >■..«• — . <«M ISJB4.is:. mcTROPOUTfin ujonf cofTTROL commu/ion Ml r« STATITN AWW/l MENfS M-m ORONO i !• = O "t. 0. I ► !.' \ I, i,• 1 \ i } lilrfl' 1 i i r > I i"/ M ■I a 1^ Of V'Ui .liiiiiWiili!!!fiji »5 * j!i ’ !'< it!^ mm -*j' Uii\\nn f- I *ii^ u H JX rl.1—z::r:i—I “1 ----------—ift*------------------■—-t ft w w >} :!i *f( il Vk 5 f*r^ » • .MUft', ftNaR * ^'‘ri^ ssrxrru I 2 ►> < PC 1 I, M*. u ill L'liJfe 'fSlE!! JH- fp LJ: 1 1 ___I Wtti' il - Ck u L m!^ all D «« • V L r* •» rv t IF Ui rt S i IV f W 1 1 P 1 t • ! ■*:i\ :• > 1 t s ............p!^---------•!-l 0 •• 1 r r : f»• 5 MAfintHAiTOW 5 n IV L pr^-' h -.5. If f; t K 7 i[f?di;;u* ■‘i JMJOi r-' / .' •' •" */i ", •' .-1 aifiRfisassp farm FULLERTON PROPERTIES l»g38fllii;^SU«8a» .: I iMWl -^t . - ■ \ t. ^/f / J *^w« m I kw«*» MMirr ««M <Mi« iwwifT ■■• #»f—♦ MwrvitfviM tm$ iftfl* I fl» • *»i9 «Mti» ite M ^ 9tM 9f rnimimmitt i * t ^ // ''A /- ■ V'l;' r’% 7'1><' lo -A-^ I teMft iHCN-mmT om: §-♦-•• . : LM .iaui ■ mmmn m m •* MM OMMiim MMrm^r •« •»<««> r> »—Mi<» «l« M "“Ml •*!««•*» rr>a>l»»l IMvkt««>. «mb*IM« •• itt •> MM >M»tMint— •« MM oMXMrlUM •« <M«M« mrnt wm ■ «M «* MM i urn •# a»i4 OimMMM •bmmm,. MMM »mU> (iMM MM* «MI >UM W • ptta* •»•»«« l*’l I fmt ■M«* tM ««• ..»—«■ <IMI11>. tmn I *M> M •*•!«• • M M M — 0 m» * tow>. Wmm mm * •« • ^ * m0»i ............. <Ma« M r««M «MM« M Ma Mm ifeaBM Mm* •IM« Mt* Mm* .tM Mm m MCtM • «>•**»• •< W« » MM. <« IM« MmM M rtMN *mMm *« « m>M OMMM tm » MM Mm* tn* «M> Mm* TtM J mt* MMM«m Mm*m; t*—i I •■•• •**•«.at MMi mM Mm* itM m >•• i«i*»—i*k» m*« M»l M MM *« ••** »iiiiW*« •mtW*. COFFIN & GRONKRQ. INC. £l«QM£EftS. LAMO iUfIVf VOW. Pt AlWHUt tONO LAKE. MINNESOTA C-0 *- i N V . 4 I % i §1-Mlil3 ll□ •1. '1; .ii ) \ • CJUi^t i ># \tC 1 91 *»;■ C *•• • <;• ;/ 'M- ■»■ 1^?' .* '. * :;:^jo. .i V- ••:*.• V r i/r ~ ^ a-r/^« ; ’.V T •>- •:. (• '• •:•: ?■ -• ■;//.;.;i^.i.-I' I• V-;..'|| ;.v•.•0:•i ••-•••••.■•. .-i? ir.- ;■ ' • •x-xi-iv^vSK:. ,i:; ••• ■{■ ■'' u 'T' ^c- t>»<^ Pi«o«s»o.vn? :V . /s^ 7S iS© •t —*: •. <»• .\k ;.^ •«■ • -»i -y;-•V--r/v < t« ; *;5l;: A k *'» • -. m it K I- A f"“ •• .♦;x»r 2no-’^' fjor O'-' ^ f:-r t ■/. • .*v •»«•... - / * %«■ i/ . • ‘ - / r- /M. \ilrl>,/y *.^ * •• • V r> . V- • # .* Ii♦ r» . >•;. ,.:.. ./-yr •.•.•, ■ -.hi.f^T.-.;• 1. V'jf-Xtf< •'V’TA ‘ ■« vrr i^^-'/T\ r^r ;>.-t f .^', r *\ f A ‘ vo»V^ • ♦ f ' ^ r^ 4-^. Bu/u r ^ ! "tOKf^ *. y> r^S’"X.1X>- ^ (/ 2ft /.*( M fi t »■ rr< ^ ^i.i>->y.l • j 1 ^ « /W • ' XO ! -jrf"7*S~ ^ (^ e>»n I. • (p 9s.*tvyo • n» 0» ^Pl^/’L. * , (J^^4 -T* «»30 ’• 310 «|. (y x*>;« 31_ • p0*^ (^ f*iP/o • /iff Ttmkt. yt-no' s* j jivVT'rrw- xi.aY. * ___ 7 » lo • 210 l**1/v • h 3 TrT-*«- ©-•>T’*r^/ J7I ‘/<**ao » 3.^^% :.V- '•? n ■s*' •* y ?*t - 0mX*^Q^ • /07 ajt ^MOru »4C >W M*. ^ §p t t$ t% t** ^-7if'»®MP - fcljrrn 9T»aor»^ •UST»w6 PkCIC KC /a> *»r iTO ««•% 0--7»* X*<x*M . <^or nMw*uitf /fwwo M >V.C. M/Oi'^- /M -7 I - i.«0 ' >»Mi» '“NttvnuMf *5*'iri»JC 7^Zl-%'i (OOU %x tLcr 4,00 %S A> A^rrCi /«s» rM.-r^ A*ip fPiKMno*^ tH«^ nr^c © /^DOlT70#oS /AJ IS. - StACit AfVtuvext ftnc ^-%^|i«sot. iAK(.y ^ RtiM. jATi* I * lb a - 5*9 vX 1-1 S09 ^«'.“-3s;4 -'•; ^ t== ;{T»-a»o'l 5fl»^ ♦ ifty ♦ *9 ♦ yio • 5*5S * Mi^ S*WTlS*TOi V# ft ?• J ^ 1Mk H C AMfSO I-K AvMt # • • *w *V *. ' *■ j'^: ©/Kift.rA> /(0O X rC. /Ai (^ fLt^*.*cnofsi CF S/D«^*i ffUF^yfO t.^. ro (*-4t»r rjC.^ /A> *‘^igCMarro*^ ‘ Ge*^«r//-/t»38 ^ ^A»nr T9*fr -fH^s .jiMwiiffir^ ^€4. J^*r /i. ‘ U»,»r «»e4riQA< 8>in<iC /f W /j *t it«ao«. Jr227^^ a j?i e -y* , LAI4E HikiUEllDMkLA (£)[T\ ^ •'f. »** '.r*w« ..1^. iTA^t HC ^ L QQ HjC.ftM.tt lA-® ■•«. '-^•rt; r#- *^t a^.w a '; , . ,.^ TltO^OiAL MEW PRDPDS <we«<% r»;. ft>n /CrO I5.t# g*ov «1f% “*•*«* ' M.^a«.*> ' 19^ * \\%. * Wti^ 9 ‘^ ^ IV so V AtwA^ff t'*'ao»5 , H,« VhoO t a • • *\tt V $ iti *^1/ * \n c. ^ • 7» N X ® • *«V 1*’ **■ jg) p#^¥/^*28M i) li'H'f • «'l-3 0 i^»n •71«1 •- ^ »o» .vV • CO % \ ■\ \ v«%-\ \ \ **^i>\ v\ ;!l I i' I! «» '* ^ •'« • A** • ?, '•.V.-.*- \\ \ D-ns. S-fV5> \ ^sm MM 9 U »«M MMMM.----•• -- m M«4 MMM !♦••• *•»!•• »f «MM **«M •iil pM4.« M#»*M ». •!*•« «. «uu rnmm^ BM. MM MM MMM MM • -M* CvMitMMi «M MMM MM»a«M4M M M*i»* MM»M • « »ltM MM«rt •. ntm t. tim M. «4M« U. HMI Mmm mm. mm MMiM* MIM Mm»M t»«l4 tMt MMltM m9rn MfiMM* MM4« MM4M M.»M« * MmM M4MM .M« M ■MMi fMIMM • MM»« Matlit m MM • i«M M rntm. MM M« MfiMM - M*4*f tM»*M M. MM ; }|. tt*M l«. MM M--4 •M* I M»i*« MM»*t M«»f Mvry. iffl •i«M' M*» r«M«li4M»4 M* •MMVrMtMM MM mmmai »M rpMH MM !*#•> Mi^ I JMM». MMi M^mJm < M4«« MUM a. MM M. flMt l»4 MM MM I M. M. >»—if < tt. r*Mi«t MM>M M MMM • i JW «• 4M- ^4MM« Ml IM » •« M M* »M MM M MM M 1. r- m ^!l t 0 lAi ■«»«%# m ?sn?Ill ?ii p • »t it )S* •Jt s [B S M2n 25n QD G »< fm JMSSU PRELIMINARY PLAT WILDHURST ESTATES UJIHIT ORONO. MINNESOTA * ______ «—^lit ' - ■<M551 I JW9 «• tMk •»«««•••m #••») A«M, W. HMMBl »«»!( «• ««»'.«< KM tVMIMt. IM»* ttftm- KM IimM ••• M* W-I>r.|« M.MM. Kt t. #»»*M«, MfMMt fM«*M •»«M< M* •!••♦•. •(•« *. #*«»<< KM *•*». •mm*'* <m««», • l'« <**■«>. (•VMt 1,1. tM • *lMM.M 6*'«M<, «• Mi ll' >• '• »•• 1 . I* CIM JMtMMi MMM ."MX IM •;!*»•, •<*•* I. »*,n> i*M Ml—*-.« r.M«*>, •, • f* ••* I • ll.il »M» VM. i. I M« . — t.«.M M* M'CtM. HM .'.MX «MI ••:•♦, »■*»• *. i.lM •*•*. M—«*■» C*M»», « •*!» *M<:> Ut • !• f*Mr, •»« —•.* M • >• r*M4 t» r» «'M «>'M< M 9T. •**> •> rt mm «m>* It rt immmm ftKB •• *t f*B M tM*. m.M •m'm*. M r«„ M> ♦ «.**ts i !:S IM • I.W k» • *• • t .» • IM > t .»l •• ts I t;;i S;u* • ^ * •■J c *1 MUt 1 *1* . -1 .,*■'* 1 * ■ W ■UIMI ft MI&MMVt MWaftfU^ BC cowtw twontw tw MMbrw ii>r—B • m*»f m ommA mmvm «m« •Ifc » « • .«MA » >«» BM ii-4 -f '•'*rs ..—4 j ■ ■• • — jmKflT WUOB CUSTOM au«JM i ! «»«J)NMIST CSt*Tf S wtLMwuurr Ml n ^ It «• 4NNi4» ti* «»•«» '• ■0 2Mim j 1 1 (>» t 1 S£Q»i AM . 1 ------W«— !' \i- 1 4i 63AK9 . ftii ffJ ffi- A ^ f 7 " cr Ator jarTl . / 4AJ ! 4 I (Jjj^ Of* 1 steM t I < ® III 1 < & <«i 1 43>,« ! 4 1i iti • mm OTirt ■p mi t9t ] ■ .nL'/x ufmmmtTA I '» ' (• I :> ©L.A :(M :•] 4*i.' .-•'^ : i LLli-i^^tfrr I: : : : :£ : : : ; ^ *-y •: i >.. ...;