Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
02-20-1990 Planning Packet
! ^ U :■ i u PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 1990 7:00 P.M. 1275 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - J. Diann Goetten ATTENDANCE PUBLIC:HEARINGS Properties, 340/350 North Arm Lane - Preliminary Subdivisi.n Lot Line Rearrangement 2. 7:30 p.m. #1495 Rod Johnson, 3740 West Wayzata Boulevard Preliminary Subdivision ACTION ITEMS Review of these items will commence between scheduled public hearings. 3. #1488 John E. Rogers, 755 Tonkawa Road - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing 4. #1489 F. John Hardin, 1496 Park Drive - Variance - Public Hearing 5. #1491 Jack Rhode, 1690 Shadywood Road - Renewal Variance - Public Hearing 6. #1492 Hark Gruss, 3285 Carman Road - Variance - Public Hearing 7. #1493 Chuck Downey, 2665 Casco Point Road - Variance - Public Hearing 8. #1494 Francis Lightly, 3585 Fredrick Street - Variances - Public Hearing 9. Confirmation of Joint Council/Planning Commission Meeting Saturday, March 10 - 8:30 a.m. for Breakfast SKETCH PLAN REVIEW 10. #1496 Robert Waade, 998 Wildhurst Trail - Sketch Plan Review of subdivision 11. #1498 John McDowell, 4645 Bayside Road - Sketch Plan Review of Subdivision 12. #1499 Peter P. Chow, 2505-07 Kelly Avenue - Sketch Plan Review of Conditional Use Permit *13^*Pla^ing Commission Approval of Minutes of January 16, 1990 Meeting 14. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the March 12, 1990 Council Meeting. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson / Proa: Date: Jeanne A. Mabusth^ Building & Zoning Administrator February 16, 1990 Subject: #1490 K-P Properties, Inc. - 340/350 North Arm Drive Preliminary Subdivision Class II Pertinent Ordinance - Definition 66, Subdivision B - Class II Subdivision required because of need to designate wetlands as drainage easements and the approval of lot width variances (please review exhibit E, Council previously variances for North Arm Estates Second Addition when platted in 1976} List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit G H I J K L M Application Addendums Property Owners List Plat Map Council Minutes of 7/26/76 Map Locating Travel Poad Within Right-of-way of North Arm Lane Dedication Language for North Arm Estates Plat North Arm Estates Plat Staff Sketch Conceptual Transportation Plan for Area Planning Commission Action Notice 1/16/oQ Horse Letter 1/18/90 Preliminary Plat Review of Application - j Planning Commission's January meeting the applicant created their review of the plats of the properties created xn North Arm Estates that the 33' of right-of-way had from the North Arm Estates properties. Since that fning of the formal subdivision application ► hff?taken. The City Attorney's office has advised that sometime prior to the creation of the lots within North Arm the a roadway of 66' in width. The west half of soL^m^ 4n Townllne Road or County Road 43. bv"^fchi AJI right-of-way was vacated cLid ^ *^«viewed the City records to see if itcould be determined what year the vacation took place. Staff has been unable to find any record of a resolution approving the ► vacation. The city Attorney's office did advise that at :7rf Estates plat, the road was alreadyidentified as North Arm Lane. aj.reaay if-r- - Mf * .-n-f—f/ j-wTkij • i 1 Zoning File #1490 February 16, 1990 Page 2 of 3 There is no record of when the name of the road was changed in the City’s records. Once again for your information, at the time of the North Arm Estates 4th Addition subdivision (the property to the immediate south) the City asked for 17' of right-of-way, there is nothing in the records that would reveal staff researched the history of the previous Co*’ ity road. As meiiibers will remember, during the sketch plan review, the lot line rearrangement is proposed to solve the septic limitations of Lot 1, the most northern lot. In previous discussions with an on-site septic evaluator, it would appear that the lot can sustain only a 2 bedroom residence. The septic limitations result from the filling that took place to the lower eastern portions of the property preventing future septic use. Septic systems cannot be installed within disturbed or filled areas. The sloping properties to the west prevent the installation of mounds. The only suitable area for mound septic systems are located within the southern lot on Lot 2. city reguires 17' of additional right-of-way. Lot 1 will be limited to a 2 bedroom residence. In discussing the proposed subdivision with adjacent neighbors, it would appear that all ask that the City refrain from taking 17' from the east side of the roadway. Staff has enclosed a section of the conceptual transportation study recently completed by Gaffron for the City Council. North Arm Lane has been delineated as a future collector road providing access to Bayside Road, North Shore Drive and North Arm Drive. Gaffron has reconfirmed that any taking of additional right- of-way for North Arm Lane will negate any chance to develop septic systems to the west side of the property. Options of Action - Denial. Finding the proposal to be in conflict with the directives of the Comprehensive Plan of the City and the Orono Zoning Code; or Approval. To approve the proposed lot line rearrangement and lot width variance for Lot 2 of 123.87 or 61.93% and not require the dedication of 17* of additional right-of-way for North Arm Lane based on the following findings: 1. The City had previously vacated all interest in 33 o. right-of-way located within the subject property. 2. Lot 2's lot width now conforms to the required 200 of width adjacent to the channel area considered the lakeshore of Lake Minnetonka. Zoning Pile #1490 February 16, 1990 Page 3 of 3 Table. Providing applicant with additional time to review vncat?o^*^f ”^®" City approved theacation of 33 of right-of-way now known as North Arm Lane. 1... Planning Commission finds that it would be Inconsistent Jtlf^rrivie^."** receive a refund of fee monies not used I. 1 > : Mmo / ft CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address -^40 and North Property identification Number (P.I.D.) 06-117~??-?4-nfl1fl Please check one - Property X _ abstract or S i 4. i/l17-eiW4-0CT09 '■/ A 4 \ \ • ■ ■ ^ torrens? Attach legal description to __________________________ Phone (home )471-0501APPLICANT Name K-P Properties. Inc^ W:0.Phone (work) d71 Address; !^048 North Shore Driy^_ City; Havzata. HH-.— ^■ OlfMER (if different than applicant) Katherine P. Axel Name James & Evelyn Adanis /K—933-4709 home • Phone (home) 941.0437 ,y|.||. ■ Phone (work) 421-0647 home^ Hopkins, MN. 55343 Address: 105^0 Ml sci «= si r>m r. i (attach list if more than one) 1020 Seltel Court ft 324 ^R RlyrCxty: Pnnn P;^pi(i<;- EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size 9.3? 9.52 Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total» all parcels Present Use (check)Residential; no. of units Other f*pecifvl Yflfant rpcifiontial Present Zoning District LR1 A________-ZZZ. proposal ___________ Division for Tax Purposes X Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: 1-------Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: 0.21__ _ _ _Units per J_Acres 196020 Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check)Residential Other (specify) I ► 2. 3. MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. A 4. 5. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature _____________________________ Date________________ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III)$150.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision)250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) 300.00 + 20.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature K-P Properties. Inc.Date 3an 25. iQgn Owner's Signature By;president Date Jan. 25. 1990 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building c Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ±J ■V. K~P Properties, Inc. REALESTATC DEVELOPMENT • MANAGEMENT 3048 North Shore Drive • Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 • 612-47l*0508 3 January 25, 1990 "f'!r’ cl • Tr A, .1 Jean A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator City of Orono ' * * •' ,\ P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN. 55323 Dear Ms. Mabusth: Enclosed is the application for Class I subdivision of the property at 340 and 350 North Arm Lane in Orono. Also enclosed is the application fee in the amount of $ 250. Attached with this application is the property list of owners within 350 feet of the subject property and the preliminary plat drawings. This subdivision application is being submitted based on the indication by the Orono Planning Commission on January 16 that since 33 feet of private road easement had been reserved from the east side previously that any future 17 feet of road ease ment would not be required from the property east of the present road. A septic engineering study previously submitted shows the need for a variance for mound septic system setback to 10 feet from the existing west boundary and slopes up to 8%. Please submit this application for consideration at the February 20, 1990 planning commmission meeting. Sincerely: Donald R. Peterson, president K-P Properties, Inc. RUN OATC 01/24/90 BATCH 002 HEMIEPIN CCXJMTY PROPERTY INFORHATIOri SYSTEM PROPERTY OHI^RS L1S1 REPORT NO, •'X4T^01 PAGE 2 PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAtC/AOOR 56 06-117-25 12 0005 04555 BAYSIOE RO vex CAPITAL INC vex CAPITAL INC PO BOX 575 LONQ LAKE HN 55556 38 06-117-23 25 0001 00056 ADDRESS UNASSIGt^ED JEANNE T ARIISTRaiG JEAN T ARItSTROfKl 255 NORTH ARH LAfE NOUR) m 55564 58 06-117-25 25 0002 04620 NORTH ARM OR H D A A H H NINTER DON A HINTER 4620 NO ARH DR NEST HOUIO MN 55564 PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAIC/AODR 56 06-117-25 25 0005 04640 NORTH ARM OR N 0 A L IVERSON OANIEL A LINDA IVERSON 4640 NORTH ARH OR HOUND ffti 55564 50 06-117-25 24 0001 00215 NORTH ARH LA JEAttlE T AmtSTROr^ JEAN T ARMSTRONG 255 NORTH ARH LANE MOUND r«l 55564 58 06-117-25 24 0002 00215 r«}RTH ARM LA JEANT4E T ARMSTRONG JEAN T ARMSTRONG 255 NORTH ARH LANE HOUND Ifl 55564 PROP AOOR OmER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 53 06-117-25 24 0003 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGfEO R N ARMSTRONG ETAL JEAN T ARMSTRONG 235 NORTH ARM LANE MOUND MN 55364 38 06-117-23 24 0006 04590 rX)RTH ARM DR H D C OLSON 6 V S OLSON DOrULD C 0LS0I4 4590 NORTH ARM OR M M0Ur«0 ril 55564 38 06-117-25 24 0008 00570 NORTH ARM LA R 2 H SMITH ROSCOE S A lURRlET C SMITH 570 NORTH ARH LANE HOUND MN 55564 =tt: PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 38 06-117-25 24 0009 00540 NORTH ARM LA KATHERINE P AXEL KATHERINE P AXEL 4225 147TH PL N E fl02N BELLEVUE HA 98007 58 06-117-25 24 0010 00550 NORTH ARH LA J A E ADAMS K-P PROPERTIES INC 3048 NORTH SHORE OR NAYZATA IW 55591 58 06-117-25 24 0011 00566 NORTH ARH LA NAM LARSON MARK JAM LARSON 366 NORTH ARH LA MOUND MN 55364 Ir PROP AOOR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR 38 06-117-23 24 0012 00360 NORTH ARM LA R D BACKERUO AOS BACKERUO ROONEY 0 A DIANE S BACKERUO 560 ARH LN N MOUND MN 55564 ^ J TOTAL BATCH 002 00015 "v - J MM DATE 01/2A/90 MTCH DOC V’fvs ji! ;.' WM HEUCPIH COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY atJERS LIST REPORT m. PI435401 PAGE 3 CD Q I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESEPfTEO ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEMICPIN COWUY OEPARTfCriT OF PROPERTY TAXATION^ TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE Loua^ V 3 I ■< i- J i E I ?. * . y •J •'I •*4 .^» «l } V* •;K •; i- **. ••’ •*' ' • ■• .• /• '. ^-pt ivu r-« • . ^ ^ • >i* , ;• t.. ■■4H -•’, ■5. . :vN.; .• r*. ^• r •. - A . M’ ■• • * •*U‘" '.^ ru - #• ” . .• ■ • , • • •*• •• • • • »■ ♦•. I*• •V? • i'*n >.tz< •iv? k\i M W' ‘V- 4 1*' ft « m^mmm 5T Jh* l*rw4 » I fii/2 SEC.3U rua. a.zs'S'^,N.i/2 XC.S. r.i/a Kasv"^ ■ © •■...■ r @ .-:i •••. ®M.I. -------^ ■ ' I ' 1 i 1 ‘ < \ I ( il ‘ 1 m K CITY OP ORORO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ZONING PILE NO.1485 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 473-7357 Date of Notice: TO:K-P Properties Inc. 3048 North Shore Drive Wayzaca, HN 55391 COPIES TO: Katherine P. Axel 1020 Seltel Court Hopkins, MN 55343 *324 David Morse 7807 Creek Ridge Circle P.O. Box 330 Minneapolis, MN 55440 James & Evelyn Adams 10530 Mississippi R. Blvd. Coon Rapids, MN 55433 TYPE OP APPLICATION: Sketch Plan Review/Subdivision DATE OP MEETING: 1/16/90 VOTE: No Vote Required Planning Commission provided the following conceptual direction concerning your proposed lot line rearrangement. 1. Planning Commission would consider granting approval of additional width variance for newly aligned Lot 2 of North Arm Estates, 2nd Addition. 2. As the 33' of right-of-way disignated for North Arm Lane came from the properties divided along the east side it would be recommended by the Planning Commission that the additional 17' of right-of-way by taken from the property on the west side of North Arm Lane at the time of a future subdivision. Applicant is encouraged to file a formal subdivision application with the City. The filing deadline for the February 20th, 1990 meeting is January 26, 1990. The filing deadline for the March 19th, 1990 meeting is February 23rd, 1390. Please contact Jeanne Mabusth (473-7357) if you have any questions concerning the above matters. L LAW OFFICES DAVID B. MORSE A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 7607 CREEKRIOGE CIRCLE P O. BOX 330 MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55440 (612) 944-5722 TELECOPIER (612) 629-2317 January 18, 1990 f1 City of Orono Attention: Jean Mabiist Planning and Zoning Department P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE: Lot 1, Block I, North Arm Estate Second Addition Dear Jean: T represent Katherine P. Axel, the owner of the above described real estate. This item was on the Planning Commission agenda on Tuesday, January 16, 1990 as item #13 for a "sketch - plan review" and was presented by Mr. Don Peterson of K-P Properties, Inc. I was in attendance and heard the discussion. I thought it important for your background information to correspond with you and give you some additional information with respect to the City's request for an additional 17 foot of roadway and the corresponding hardship that this will create with respect to the property as well as Mrs. Axel personally, if the 17 feet is taken: 1. First of all, as was noted by Hon Peterson, the 33 foot strip for the present roa<l did come from the North Arm Estates property. 2. This is a private road way and is owned by Armstrong whom I believe continues to pay taxes on it although the City has apparently maintained the road. 3. With respect to the Olson property. T think at such time as a subdivision is requested, obviously as a precondition the City can get the 17 feet it needs for the road from the Ol.son property as opposed to the North Arm Estates property. 4. At such time as Armstrong property is developed, I assume as a precondition, the City can extract the present 33 foot strip as a dedicated road as well as its cul-de-sac, etc., that they may need on the Armstrong property. I LAW OFFICES DAVID a MORSE A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION City of Orono .I/innary 18, 1990 Page Two The Important point ... noted is that if, in fact, the City is Insistent on the 17 feet. This wv,'1 then automaticnlly render unworkable the solution Don Peterson presented with respect to the septic tank and, in fact, my client's property is in reality virtually unsaleable and unbuildable due to the lack of an adequate septic tank site and probably diminishes in value by $40-50,000. This presents a hardship to the property and also to Mrs. Axel personally as this is the one significant asset that she received in a marriage dissolution proceeding approximately 2-3 years ago. From an equitable standpoint, I also think it is perhaps appropriate that tljo additional 17 feet needed for the road way come from the other side since from a historically perspective, they have contributed nothing and this property has already contributed 33 or approximately 2/3rds of what will ultimately be the 50 foot. 1 believe the scenario that is outlined in this letter will allow the City ultimately to achieve its goal, l.e., a 50 foot dedicated road, since, at some point in the future, 1 assume that the Olson property will be subdivided and also the Armstrong property will eventually be platted and subdivided. If you have any questions with respect to Mrs. Axel's concerns or the solution I have outlined in this letter on her behalf, please call me at your convenience. itery truly yours, David B. Morse DBM/ami I cc: Katherine Axel To:Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Proa: Date: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator February 14, 1990 Subject:#1495 Rodney Johnson, 3740 West Wayzata Boulevard Preliminary Subdivision, Class II - Public Hearing Total Area « 789,451 s.f. or 18.123 acres Proposed Parcel A * 100,730 s.f. or 2.31 acres Proposed Parcel B = 688,721 s.f. or 15.81 acres As this is a subdivision of a plat, the parcel designation must be changed to a lot and block designation. Pertinent Ordinance - Section 11.03, Definition 66 (B) - Class II subdivision. Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (L) - Conditional use required for crops/nursery - minimum of 10 acres of area required. In February 1982, Cliff Otten the owner of the property was granted a conditional use permit for nursery stock. Plantings from the nursery are located within Parcel B. The required area is still satisfied as the proposed area consists of 15.81 acres. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map - Gaffron's Memo - Septic Site Plan - Council notice of Action 2/23/82 - Preliminary Plat Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit D E F G Review of Application - Mr. Johnson, the applicant and future owner of Parcel A, presents the division of a 18+ acre parcel owned by Clifford Otten. All lots satisfy the lot standards for the FR-lB zoning district. Each parcel satisfies the 2 acre dry contiguous area. Parcel A is shown to have 2 accesses. The primary access off of Highway 12 and a secondary access exiting through an easement through the property to the west at County Road 6. In review of the survey submitted, there appears to be no existing access provided to Parcel B where the nursery is located. The owner of remaining Parcel B should provide the City with direction regarding how access will be provided to the site. The subdivision is currently under review by MnDot and the County Department of Transportation. In Exhibits C & G, staff notes a discrepancy in the rights-of-way shown for both Burlington Northern and Highway 12. It .-..r- Zoning File #1495 February 14, 1990 Page 2 of 2 The plat map shows 150' of right-of-way for the railroad and €6' for state Highway 12. The survey shows the railroad at 100' and an 83' right-of-way for state Highway 12. As of this writing, staff has not received any responses from both reviewing agencies and will be able to provide reports at your meeting night. Gaffron confirms that septic testing submitted for this review finds adequate area for an alternate on-site septic system and confirms that the current system serving the house. Installed in 1982, is satisfactory. Pending receipt of the reports from the State and County Departments of Transportation and resolve of the discrepancies in the right-of-way shown on the survey, staff would recommend approval of the proposed 2-lot plat finding that the subdivision satisfies all standards of the RR-IB rural residential zoning district and on-site septic codes of the City. Each lot has adequate frontage on both State and County roadways. Such approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The subdivision is defined as a plat. All lots created must be defined as lots with block designations. 2. Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated 10' along all perimeter property lines and 5' along the shared lot lines of proposed Lots 1 and 2. 3. Right-of-way for State highway and County roadways shall be resolved by both the agencies and the City. Such dedication shall be consistent with previous subdivisions along these roadways. 4. Payment of a park fee for Parcel B of $100.00. There is no charge for Parcel A because it is a developed lot. 5. Owner of Parcel B is hereby advised that the creation of a new curb cut to serve the nursery property must be approved by either the State Highway Department or the County Highway Department depending upon where access is achieved. 6. The City reaffirms its approval of the original conditional use permit for the farm/nursery stock use on proposed Parcel B and that the original condition that no stock shall be sold from this site is still in effect. : f fOl. CITX OF OROHO - SUBDIVISIOH APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 3740 !-Jest Wayzata Blvd. Orono, h!N • '1 2f-!l8-23-5J?"t)008 * Pj^operty Identification Number (P«I.D») 22—C003 — Please check one - Property abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application APPLICANT Name Rodnev L. Johnson Phone (home) (612)473-966! ___ Phone (work) r£i2lM2a5050. Address: 3740 West Wavzata Blvd.______City: Orono___________ Zip:_5225£ I OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Clifford L. Often____________ Phone (home) (612)473-7626 Phone (work) (612)473-5425 Address: 2182 Homestead Trail City: riedina Zip: 55356 EXISTING LAND OSB Number of Tax Parcels _2_____ Development Size .566 (attach list if more than one) rrrv r.r nonn 01 (a few_ Acres Dry Land ^ OUZsM _ Acres Wet Land Acres Totalr all parcelsI875b6 Present Use (check)x>:Residential; no. of units Other (specify)^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Zoning District PROPOSAL _ _ _ _ _ Division for Tax Purposes XX Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) _ _ _ _ _ _ Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: 1 Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Units per Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land x:^Residential Other (specify) I II Ayia 2. 3. HINUflJM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey, Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Stampedf legal sized envelopes (110) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). As an addendum to this application^ please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 4. 5. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Payment of fees (par)c fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _Date FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) $150.00 250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential)300.00 + 20.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) •(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature Date Date / /Applicant must have 4^1 submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. _ <Xl RUN DATE 01/29/90 BATCH DOS MENflEPIH COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY WtlERS LIST PROP ADDR OltCR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 30 29-110-23 32 0006 00050 ADDRESS UNASS1GI4ED HEIM COUNTY PK RESERVE PIST HENN COUNTY PK RESERVE OIST PROP AOOR OHICR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 50 29-110-25 34 0006 05660 SIXTH AVE N PARK GUN CLUB INC PARK GUN CLUB C/0 RUBY 6ESCHHIN0 4959 VERA CRUZ AVE MPLS NN 55429 PROP AOOR OltCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 30 29-110-25 54 0009 05000 NAYZATA BLVO MAYONA V CIRSPINSKI GARY V KIRT 20060 BOULDER BRIDGE DR EXCELSIOR III 55531 PROP AOOR OltCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 5S 29-110-25 45 0004 05565 SIXTH AVE N B N A M L MEINHARDT BEN a MYRNA MEINHARDT 3565 6TH AVE NO LONG LAKE MN 55556 PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 36 52-110-23 21 0005 00056 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED S A CIRSPIICKI ETAL CLIFFORD L OHEN 2265 M NAYZATA BLVO LONG LAKE MN 55556 PROP AOOR OltCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 36 52-116-25 22 0005 03025 SIXTH AVE N FRED HOLASEK JR ETAL FRED HOLASEK JR 3625 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE IM 55556 56 29-116-25 33 0001 05960 SIXTH AVE N NORTHERN STATES POHER CO N5P PROPERTY TAX DEPT C2I 414 NICOLLET lULL MPLS MN 55401 58 29-116-23 54 0007 00050 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED PARK GUN CLUB INC PARK GUN CLUB C/0 RUDY GESCI0IINO 4959 VERA CRUZ AVE MPLS MN 55429 50 29-110-25 42 0006 05460 SIXTH AVE N HENTCPItl CO PARK DIST HENN CO PARK RESERVE ATTN CHUCK BELLINGHAM 5600 CO RD NO 24 MAPLE PLAIN 191 55559 58 52-116-25 12 0001 05500 NAYZATA BLVO H HILLIAM LURTON H HILLIAM LURTON 5501 NORMAN CENTER DR MPLS 114 55457 36 52-116-25 21 0005 00605 STUBDS DAY RO N SAN KRonrcss STEPHEN M KROGNESS 605 STUCSS BAY RO N LONG LAKE T94 f;S556 58 32-118-25 24 0004 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO LISLE VICKERMAN JR ET AL ORCHARD PARK FARM INC 5980 HATERTOHN RO MAPLE PLAIN T94 55559 REPORT NO. PX455401 PAGE 5 38 29-118-23 33 0008 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED BURLINGTOtl NORTHERN RY BURLINGTON NORTHERN RY 38 29-118-23 34 0008 03T90 NAYZATA 8LVD CLIFFORD L OTTEH CLIFFORD L OHEN 2265 H NAYZATA BLVD L0IT6 LAKE m 55356 30 29-118-23 43 0003 03565 SIXTH AVE N J TIERNEY A H MEEIIAN-TIERTCY JAtES J TIERNEY AND MAURA MEEHAN TIERNEY 3565 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE MN 55366 38 32-118-23 21 0001 00038 AOORESS UlASSlGrCQ H HILLIAM LURTON H HILLIAM LURTOI 5501 NORMAN CENTER OR MPLS m 55437 I J 58 52-118-25 22 0002 05825 SIXTH AVE N FRED HOLASEK JR ETAL FRED HOLASEK JR 5825 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE MN 55556 'V, TOTAL BATCH 003 00017 V t * MM DATE 01/29/M OATCH OOS fM. B \ r r h ••• 1 f • .V. t •• \ )•■ I *9 > HENNEPIN COUNrV PROPERTY INFORNATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHI4ERS LIST REPORT NO. PX435^01 PACE « I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESCrnATlON OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTrjENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION# TO THE BEST OF HY KNOKLEOGE AND BELIEF DATE. ARTriENT • / ///Sema.. #-O'»^ ‘-‘.V ^M. tf. m D To: Pron: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: February 12, 1990 Subject: #1495 Rod Johnson/Otten Brothers - Septic Review I have reviewed the existing and proposed septic system information for this property, and would make the following comments: 1. The existing system consists of 2 tanks and 900 square feet of drainfield. We have no record of any problems with this system since it was upgraded in 1982. 2. An alternate site to the east of the existing system has been tested and is suitable for a sewage treatment mound. This site meets all required setbacks and slope considerations. 3. Per the attached diagram from City records, the existing system is well within the property boundaries and does not cross the proposed new lot line. Based on the above information, I would recommend approval of the proposed subdivision, finding that all septic requirements for subdivision are met. ’Tiliil e ^ I-- - Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date February 13, 1990 Subject:#1488 John E. Rogers, 755 Tonkawa Road Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.24, Subdivision 3 (A) - Conditional use permit required for guest house use. Applicant plans to renovate existing garage to recreational/residential unit. Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) - Lot requirements - secondary detached residential unit must meet standards of LR-lB zoning district. Zoning District - LR-IB Required Area » 1 acre or 43,560 s.f. Existing » 2.3 acres or 101,100 s.f. Required Lot Width » 140' Proposed « 220' Required Separation Between Residence Structures if Divided: Required ■20* (10' side setback) Required ■ 100* (50* for rear/front setback) Existing ■ 144' Required Setback for Principal Structure from Street Lot Line - 35' Existing » 192'+ List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Application Property Owners List Plat Map Planning Commission Minutes 2/21/89 Floor Plan Cross Section of Structure Survey/Site Plan Zoning File #1488 February 13, 1990 Page 2 of 2 Review of Application - Dutlnq the review of ♦“«Vhe'W variances for additional =““=“^'3^ review (Exhibit G) shows the The site plan for future recreational use. In garage structure <3®planning Commission meeting ofreviewing the minutes of the Pianni^^^^ applicant on February 21, 1989 (Exhibit D), sta« ^ structure and the the proposed use of the detach ga^^g future recreational applicant advised ’P®"’‘^®t8 of th Pt°P application shows plans The floor _plan sub^t^d/°r the app structureuse. The floor plan s“hm^^A®Ad ° if the detached structurefor Pl'iwhing (bathroom) and heating.^^If^t^^^ structure would was not provided with heating The structure could not have required a ^ential unit. The only thing function as an independen aoolicant receives approval of a lacicing is a kitchen JA^ant may install a kitchen areaconditional use permit, applic | ^ hardcover proposed on ?!.‘,1;clVrt'y^'“Hi7dco^eV:i‘th"n^» sstbs^ .res r.bains at 18.4%. The ordinance does not ‘^^®hinguish b^^twen the con^ an accessory, detached, ®“PPA"Vouse (i ® ^ the full scale r °ou^^ 5*„!“t\S'6‘§l2!fl “and" sJc Jx\\“t?„%"l'lL*^^i:t“ae^"v^e7rHrpt\i^?pVl"?eaide„ce. Although o"® 5f^lubdivid^T become a future AV a with the application the property the sutvey/aite plan subdivided to neet tegular contains adequate ®>^®f ®"A,fA„\es meet required setbacks, lot requirements and all structures meet reg Options of jction - members should review the necessary finding, iithi^ se'ction 10.09, subdivision 6 (A) 1-3. 2. Approval based on the following findings: M The subject property meets all lot standards for a residential subdivision of 2 lots. i>r sie'“o'rt'he‘oci/prtr ^f-h^e ^:f^c7pVrbu\iVir, and their guests This approval is based on the condition that the structure sHi,?! «ver be used for rental purposes. I 1 #LL r --.n .4, ,^ , CITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND OSB APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ~7^ / ONI^AkJA (Z£>^0 Property Identification Number (P f 7*Vi^*<***j ‘.r.A"} .i.D.) 0£'-/|7-23 33 ^3r;v ai Please attach legal description to application if not include^“ '' on required survey. ::crz7»jT^•» ••-i • J-ITf'l •IV A »?V. l‘» » ' / I APPLICANT Name ^ Phone (home) ^”7 3 — Phone (work)-- - - - - - -g- - - - - - - - - - - City Zip 1 OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) —• Phone Address Citv “ Zip 4 Date Property Acquired list (month/year) I (do) <(do riot^ also own t h^ adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL DSB PERMITS -> Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee _ _ _ _ $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application _ _ _ _ $125.00 Residential accessory Use __ _ _ _ $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) be (^^^Tso .OOrG^^t House/Guest Apartments _ _ _ $150.00 Duplex Credlt/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more _ _ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS _ _ _ _ $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation _______ $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _ _ _ _ $250.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _ _ _ _ $100.00 Appeals _ _ Other “ see fee schedule ■ PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQtDescribe in detail = Ey(Jr,»C ^T/?Kcni<rfc To (^c/>E€/h I w.r>^ /?^r.v REQUIRED Cer SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application^ please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete Initials of Clerical Staff: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the Information supplied is true and correct to th^e^best of his/her Icnowledge. Applicant's signature m Date ONMBIIS SIGmiaSB The owner hereby acJcnowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of Investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. * CERTIFICATE OP MAILING STATE OP MINNESOTA COUNTY OP HENNEPIN CITY OP ORONO ) ss. I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1488, was mailed to the attached list of property owners . In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 31st day of January, 1990. Li MM DAn O1/10/S9 iATCN MS 9RM ANff OMCR MMC TAKRAVtR NAHi/AMR 38 95-117-23 S3 0001 OOMS TONKANA RO TEMPLE ISRAEL OP NIMCAPOLIS TEMPLE ISRAEL OP HIMCAPOLIS tSIA EMERSON AVE SO MPLS m 55405 HEMCPIN COLtfnr PROPERTY INPORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY ONNERS LIST 30 05-117-23 33 0003 00755 TONCAHA ROii.s'rts..««« 755 TOMCANA RO LONB LAKE PM 55354 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 7 38 05-117-23 34 0001 00722 TONKANA RO N P NV6AAR0 A J I EROHAPM TOM R HAU6EN/TERESA RITTEN 722 TCMCANA RO LONG LAKE HN 55354 NAME TAV^PAYER NAME/AOM 38 05-117-23 34 0M3 M724 TOMUNA RO RMERT H LARSON ETAL ROBERT H URSON 724 TOMUNA RO LONB LAKE Ml 55354 30 05-117-23 34 0004 00740 TONCAHA RO mark C 6RE6ERS0N HARK C 6RE6ERS0N 740 TONKANA RO LONG LAKE PM 55354 38 05-117-23 34 0005 00744 TOMCANA RO FRANCES L LARSON FRANCES L URSON 744 TOMUNA RO LONG LAKE MN 55354 PROP AOOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP AOOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOM 50 05-117-23 34 0004 00750 TOMUNA RO HENRY E OENSON ETAL henry E BENSON 750 TONKANA RO LONB LAKE Ml 55354 30 05-117-23 34 0M9 M774 TONKANA RO ami c fisher AMI C FISHER 774 TOMUNA RO LONB LAKE Ml 55354 38 05-117-23 34 0007 00740 TOMUNA RO ARTHUR J BERTELSON ET AL ARTHUR J • BETTY M BERTELSON 12817 BURNELL OR MIMCTONKA HN 55343 38 M-117-2S 21 0001 00801 TONKANA RO •1 E A L B MOORE JOHN E A LOURDES B HOORE 801 TONKANA RO LONB LAKE Ml 55354 30 05-117-23 34 OOM 00770 TONKANA RO HAUREEN LOUISE LAJOY MAUREEN LOUISE LAJOY 770 TOMCANA RO LONG LAKE MN 55354 O TOTAL BATCH 003 00011 o X CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE ANB tbiw orTHE^HEMCNN^COUN^^^M APPEARS THIS OATE ON THE RECMDSM S kUSSoS S??IlJeP?^77®" taxation, TO »C BEST DATE L PPERIY TAXATION, TO WC B f ) #1382 G O 4 J> fcE0ri4-^..4. G minutes of the planning commission meeting FEBROART 21, 1989 ZONING FILE #1381-RHODB CONTINUED be» with the exception of the foundation. She recommended that this application be reviewed with similar considerations as the Johnson application off North Arm Drive, in that approval be conditioned upon the existing foundation being used. The general concensus of the Planning Commission was that they were in favor of the proposed house not extending as close to the lakeshore as the existing house. They were also in favor of the reduction in hardcover in the 0-75' setback area from 15.8% to 13.3%. The new structure would be right on the average lakeshore setback line, and will have an attached garage. The detached garage will be removed. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Hanson, seconded by Planning Commissioner Cohen, to recommend approval of this application granting the lakeshore setback variance required for new construction on the existing foundation. The setback shall be allowed at 59' to accomodate the 2' upper story deck extending into the lakeshore protected area; the main part of the house shall be at 61'. In addition, approval is recommended for the hardcover variance of 13.3%, or 812 s.f., within the 0—75 setback area, with no additional hardcover allowed in that area. Motion, Ayes»5, Nays«0, Motion passed. / /«1382 JOHN ROGERS 755 TONKANA ROAD PUBLIC HEARING 8:47 P.M. - 9:00 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate or Mailing were duly noted. The applicants were not present for this matter, however, Mr. Mark Lumry of Arteka Corporation, was present on their behalf. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron informed the Planning Commission that there had been a revision to this proposal. There will be no Increase in hardcover in the 0-75' zone due to the removal of an existing storage shed. Mr. Lumry also explained that there would not be any additional terrace area as originally proposed. Chairman Kelley clarified that this application now involved only the conversion of hardcover to structural hardcover and an average lakeshore setback variance. Gaffron agreed. Planning Commissioner Brown asked for clarification as to the average lakeshore setback. Gaffron explained that the house to the south, approximately 200* away would not be affected, to the north, there were only camp buildings. Mr. Lumry mentioned the fact that the existing guest house and main residence were in front of the addition. There is an existing brick retaining wall which would minimize the visual impact or the addition from the lake. \) I L l : minutes op the planning commission meeting FEBRUARY 21, 1989 ZONING FILE #1382-ROGBRS CONTINUED of '“'out the proposed use were planning to convert the oaraoe intn*^ that the Rogers “Mr. Lumry also noted that at ^®®^®*tional area. rebuild and slightly relocate thL Rogers may wish tothe lake. -"^nrxy relocate the existing stairway leading to Plann^i^^*Conraissi'oner ^H^Sson Brown, seconded by average \aS^ore setba^°^^^^ ®PProval of th40-75' zone. Moos suggested i variance in the there will be no net increa« ^ storage shed so that that condition into his mo^lnr, Brown incorporated mentioned the fact that the Citv lnain» seconded. Gaffron drainage plan. Mr. Lumry said that^it w« th« “ to have that information. Brown aLo inVludld ® his motion; Hanson secondedf^o^ion, ^vesfl sf Nay, because they would preferJa^Scov'LV iV the q-75'%^^ h«dco^rr.°%Xnx;reL:^d"h!fcoS struc%"u"raJ being asked bit by bit for mor^ fnS ° potential of^ ea Die oy Dit for more and more hardcover in the future. SSSf2*S?°" PLANNING commission OF FOSHAT/PROCEDUIML MODIFICATION BY REVIEWING STAFF the ch.%e'?n2L*'irriVt°w"h.'‘r",“y ”s°t“If? "tulf SinThs would monitor the new p?LeIure 'for Iht ne«"JeS PLANNTOG COMMISSION APPROVAL OF JANUARY 17, 1989 MINUTES Nay.-0?Motion 4«ed? C='”'"i«i°n Meeting. Motion, Ayes-S, PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE represent Planning Commissioner, Sarah Moos, would cl^cil Meeti%! ' Cot^assion at the March 13, 1989 city aojoorhmert at 91 05* Planning Commission Meeting adjourned I J Pf,CN»DE VEMTS re’ ** ^•^ Ptilf I !•(» AKMiOCifNY av cjoHiiMaous r INiUL. SHEETROCK mUi* hm UJLIHG yc PLYWOOD ^4 r l>^ RW A'W iw ttT. SOFFIT MTML PROVIDE VENT E«T 2L*4 Ifc'OC. SECTION ^Ihl ! .,1| • • V ^ 'i ”. N > \ II ll TO:Mayor Grabek and Council Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Jeanne Mabusthr Building & Zoning Administrator DATE: February 13« 1990 SOBJ: #1489 ~ F. John Hardin, 1496 Park Drive *> Variances Public Bearing List of Bsdiibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit C D E F G Application Applicant's Addendum Property Owners List Plat Map Survey/Site Plan Elevations Floor Plan Pertinent Sections of the Ordinance- 1. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9(c) - Oversized Accessory Structures a. Variance to allowed area for an oversized accessory structure for property within 0-1.99 acres. Total Area Allowed Existing 44,418 s.f. or 1.01 acres 1,000 s.f. 999 s.f. b. Total accessory structures allowed on property within 0-1.99 acres: Allowed Existing Proposed Variance 2,000 s.f. 1.889.6 s.f. 2.055.6 s.f. 55.6 s.f. or 2.7% 2. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14(c) - Review of lot coverage requirement for lot under 1.99 acres: Allowed Existing Proposed 6,662.7 s.f. or 15% 2,724 s.f. or 6.13% 2,89C s.f> or 6.5% No Variance Required 3. Section 10.22, Sulsdivision 2 - Review of Hardcover 250-500* setback area: Allowed » 13,325 s.f. or 30% Existing ■ 5,124 s.f. or 11.5% I (Applicant proposes structural hardcover o£ 16S s.f. over existing non-structural hardcover). Review of Application - omiarina-off of the existing over- The applicant . total area of 1»166 s.f. for a sized 1 |o iVres in area. The oversized accessory property less an area variance. In review r£ThT:e*:aiViSr.-c«“s«iy •Va"l “lra%«\are ?o”t\r/llofed to«^? -a "orac“?Kro‘ri ftrtc'^p" - his property. JlMSe review the tactual findings noted above. Applicant may be asked if in area \n*order to reduce Structures could be removed o this current proposal. Both the number of variances requ ^ east of the property appearaccessory Btructures to the rear or east^of ^ older^intage, in to be in good condition. The sne submitted for this fact in close ° ^hat the shed may have been an older application, it 1 As survey shows on most garage and scheduled ^®”®^®-garage-new position". rp?i-tX‘uW^ *o”vlra"ge ‘ f^^pr?n\Vl“and «cr.ory structuras. options of Action - ^gfer to the necessary findings in iU «c«oi o^f%»s" S*“‘ic’n*'fo..», subdivision 3(a). 2. Approval: a. As PJ^oP®s®<^^®‘5'^if^”^o®al^area^ of^l?166^s.f!^ where only a accessory structure ^ zg allowed. A variance to the ?o%'V/cr.L^‘%“«u“c?uzU a lob less than 1.9, acres in area; or partial). CITY OP OROHO - V3^ANCE APPLICATION fir Initial Application Fee $175.00 ' ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) #1 ^ '.1 % \ PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address,Park Mau^J Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 07*IIVll HI oon CItY If DROIO iicKvMf OFFICE , Attach legal description to application if not included on »7*> M * r.,uir,a ,urv_e,.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -. Phone (home) ^01^4/90 Name _f. ToU h |4>gL»*Jm fowwai-) Phone (work) fS"2‘S^8 7U APPLICANT T 1 Address; IH^(t Pmt-U <>»>;»< city: maun ti_____ Zip; OMNBR (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City;Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT DSE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District LRII Present Use of Property f Residential Other (specify) description of request Estimated Construction Cost $ Des^ibe wuest in detail; Ikl SyPA fs *|r» T7 IlUb Tt , VARIANCES REQUIRED atrtiLiy i» pl>CC Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front _ _ Hardcover Side Rear) Other \/a»»a»»cf ^ CillstU at/erriTfi/ . I. 1 HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations ;Tfc» fe If wm tm^ll ***y l>i«n>i imamT _ _ _ _ _ _ DBSCRIPTIOH OP UHOSUAL PROPBRTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. SJcetches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application^ please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A NORKING COPY (11* Z 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the _ infonwtion has not been Inclua^. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete Initialed by Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator^ agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application# and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to bes^ of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's Signature t to the bes^ of Date L ONNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff# consultants# agents# Commission members# and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification Owner's Signature n of thj^^reques^ Date / .IT 6 i Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting# please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. a ; •7. ntbuAmitJ' ^ l/d/uifltn^ TpOAy#44 ^ di a^fJl^jLfn w5 ^ l?tg /47 . /lUid’4. lUA K/C^vJ^MU 4 L O oAjL jLJ. ^JL^ ^YtAUimmiUMmmi % • 9 iJh" \M’SiS Ilb I) 6v^ £vu fouM K/M. prWtt«/ AOjC'. ^ T .AaaI. wJdi 1a ^vur & J^AttfJluvAA OA • f^$ib<JLij/JUAA>AtJU^ UjtfA. jStML dL%, ujtf4m> LyJJU'. iJf AJjfyAM, ,>■. u RUN DATE 01/19/90 BATCH OOX PROP AOOR OHHER NAtC TAXPAYER NANE/AODR 38 07-117-23 ^1 007<t 01900 PARK DR TONI F ANDERSEN TOra F ANDERSEN 1900 PARK OR HOUND m 55369 PROP AOOR ONNER NANE TAXPAYER NAI£/AODR 36 07-117-23 92 OOlS 01962 PARK DR LORENZ H KUTZ ETAL L0REr4Z N KUTZ 1962 PARK DR HOUR) HN 55369 PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 38 07-117-23 92 0020 01935 PARK DR H J KELLCN A L C KELLEN HICMAEL J KELLEN 1935 PARK DRIVE HOUR) MN 55369 PROP ADDR OltlER NAfC TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 36 07-117-23 93 0003 01530 CRCIIARO BEACH PL L A OOttlAY L A OOltlAY 15309 HINNETOrrA INO RO HlNNETOfKA Mil 55395 PROP AOOR OHTCR NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 38 07-117-23 93 0015 09210 NORTH SHORE DR KILLIAN F KALEY KILLIAN F KALEY 9210 NORTH SHORE DR NOUIO HN 55369 PROP AOOR ONNER HAKE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 38 07-117-23 93 0027 01998 PARK OR STEPHEN J HOHELLS SfEPHEN J HOHELLS 1996 PARK DR NOUIO MN 55369 MCr*ICPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OUTERS LIST 30 07-117-23 <*2 0013 01422 P.'.RK OR 0 J AIT3RYS • T L 0 J At'DRYS « T L 1422 PAm; DRIVE MOUMO MM SS364 PEDERSEN PEDERSEN 30 07-117-23 42 0010 01415 PARK DR RONALD RERTAGNOLI ETAI. RONALD H BERTAETOH 1415 PAP.K OR MOUND ICI 55364 30 07-117-23 43 0001 00030 ADDRESS UNASDICNEO F J HARDIN 111 ETAL FRAIKLIN J HARDIN 1496 PARK DR RT 1 IKXJNO MN 55364 30 07-117-23 43 0013 01496 PARK DR FRAimLlN J HARDIN III FRAIKLIN J HARDIN 1496 PARK DR RT 1 HOUND 111 55364 30 07-117-23 43 0016 04200 ITIRTH SHORE DR D T RYAN S N J A RYAN DANIEL t MARY JO RYAN 4200 lURTH SHORE DRIVE MOUND ttl 55364 TOTAL BATCH 001 00016 REPORT NO. PI43S401 PAGE 1 30 07-117-23 42 0014 01442 PARK OR G L SCHULTZ ETAL GEORGE I SCHULTZ 1442 PARK DR MOUND HN 55364 30 07-117-23 42 0019 01423 PARK DR R T HOHELLS ROOERT T HOHELLS 1423 PARK OR MOUND HN 55364 30 07-117-23 43 0002 04190 NORTH SHORE DR J S J MEHR JAMES A t JEAltlE H NEHR 4190 NORTH SHORE OR MOUn Itl 55364 ( h } r-" ■ It * 30 07-117-23 43 0014 04240 NORTH SHORE DR SANDRA J SMANSON SAiniRA SMANSON 4240 NORTH SHORE DRIVE HOlRff) KN 55364 30 07-117-23 43 0024 01535 ORCHARD BEACH PL MAIXY F OELTON NANCY F OELTON 1535 ORCHARD BEACH PLACE MOUND MN 55364 % i L KUN DATE 01/XV90 ’ BATCH 001 k- ■ '. t r a q: ■y HinrrcPiN coumty property information system PROPERTY OIVIERS LIST REPORT NO. PI<*35^01 PAGE 2 I CERTIFY TI;AT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESCmrATIOfI OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE IILr»IEPIN COJrilY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION^ TO THE BEST OF MT MJCHLEDGE AND BELIEF. ^ DATE BY _ _ _ _ _ »' II ”■3 ‘BuiUi CO .» '« U £ > « U t if q) Ia: co 0 > {u t,‘ ;• 1 — - *J I ro *» h— c c Ic « s a (/ 2c(t c O 5 u n*Cfc < ( n rLW-A i#vim:liMA%*cusr:irBV r-»* \ . « • * K >ct r « i. IL C 3 I i- 5 TO:Mayor Grabek and Council Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Planning Commission Members City Administrator Berr.hardson FROM: Jeanne Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE: SUBJ: February 12, 1990 #1491 Jack F. Rhode, 1690 Shadywood Road Renewal Variances - Public Hearing List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit D E F G H I Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit J K L M N 0 Application Plat Map Property Owners List Applicant's Addendum Existing Hardcover Inventory Proposed Hardcover Inventory Elevations Floor Plan Staff's Sketch Designating New Construction within 0-75* Setback Area Planning Commission Minutes of 2/21/89 Council Minutes of 3/13/89 Site Plan-Proposed Hardcover and Removals Average Lakeshore Setback Line Existing Survey Resolution #2593 Review of Current Application - Mr. Rhode has applied for renewal variances of the original variance application applied for in 19P9 (Pile #1381). The applicant proposes no changes from the original submittal. Resolution #2593 will expire on March 13, 1990. The application involves the following variances: Total Area:Required » 21,780 s.f. Existing « 17,700 s.f. or .41 acres Plat Width:Required Lakeshore Building Line 100' 82.9' or 82% i » 80* or 80% Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 - Lakeshore Setback Variance (Required for New Construction and Intensification of Structure within Defined Lakeshore Protected Area): Required Existing Principal Structure Proposed Principal Structure Existing Accessory Structure Proposed Accessory Structure 75 55 61 10 59 V Memo -Zoning File #1491-Rhode February 12, 1990 Page 2 of 2 (Second level deck extends 2* beyond lake front of proposed principal residence, steps at lower level extend 14" beyond front line of house) Variance: Principal Structure “14* or 18.6% Accessory Structure * 16* or 21% Section 10.22 Subdivision 2 - Hardcover Variance Required within 0-75* Protected Area for New Construction. Review of hardcover within 0-75* setback area: Area « 6,100 s.f. Allowed « 0 s.f. Existing « 926 s.f. or 15.8% Proposed “ 812 s.f. or 13.3%* Reduction in hardcover » 114 s.f. or 1.9% Removal of 326 s.f. (Review Exhibits E, F, I, and L) ♦New Construction within 0-75* setback area - 177 s.f. of new principal structure and 35 s.f. of upper balcony. Review of hardcover within 75-250* setback area: Area Allowed Existing Proposed Increase of Hardcover 11,600 s.f. 2,900 s.f.or 25% 2,290 s.f. or 19.7% 2,883 s.f. or 24.85% 593 s.f. or 5.1% In light of recent Council reviews dealing with new construction or expansion within the 0-75* setbaeJ area, staff would ask that you refer specifically to Exhibit I. There will be approximately a total of 812 s.f. of structure within the 0-75* setback area. Of that, 212 s.f., or 3.4% will be new structure (177 s.f. of structure on the lower level and 35 s.f. for upper level balcony. Also, there is an overall reduction in hardcover within the 0-75* setback area of 114 s.f. or 1.9%). The Findings and Conditions of the original approval are set forth in Resolution #2593, Exhibit O. VCITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION is g Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional varian Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) >1 I r , # PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) SB /7—_o2/ OC>/V r^m(m it 01 £EV 100.00 cm . JL 100.00 R£cnpT-mK rw 11167120 cm mU5:jC01/25M Attach legal description to application if not Included on required survey. )^e/ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (home) -^7/- 7/^^APPLICANT Name ne (worlc) S3B'-~OS'C^/ Address City _ P^ne (worlc) ’ ^ytJ Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired /9(B7 (month/ysar) I (do)(Tdo notT) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT DSB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District 7.^ ~/*C Present Use of Property _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ ([^^R^idential^ other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $_ Describe request in detail: VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Setback Variances (Front _ _ Hardcover Side Rear) Other I tu salt 6 CERTIFICATE OP MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OP HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO ) ) ) 8S. ) ) I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1491, was mailed to the attached list of property owners . In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 31st day of January, 1990. 3 1 .t RUN DATE 11/10/66 HE»»EPIN COWUr PROPERTY IHFORHATIOtl SYSTEM PROPERTY 0HMER5 LIST REPORT NO. PX635601 PAGE 6 BATCH 002 PRt)P AOOR OHKeR IIAHC TAXPAYER HAME/ADOR 36 17-117-23 21 0006 01675 SIIAOYHOOO RO RICHARD 0 HORUH A HIFE RICHARD HORUH 1675 SHAOYHOOO ROAD HAYZATA ill 55391 38 17-117-23 21 0005 01719 FAGERMESS POINT RO lAUREEN E DARLING lAUREEN E DARLING 1719 FAGERMESS POINT RO ORONO l«l 55391 38 17-117-23 21 0016 01650 SHAOYHOOO RD K H ROELOFS ETAL K H ROELOFS 1650 SHAOYHOOO RD HAYZATA MM 55391 PROP AOOR OHIIER NAhE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 38 17-117-23 21 0015 01670 SHADYUOOO RD TtlOmS R 5AREHPA ETAl YHOHAS R SAREHPA 1670 SHAOYHOOO ROAD HAYZATA III 55391 38 17-117-23 21 0016 01680 SIIADYHnOO RO JOHN G DOLEMAN ETAL JOHN G OOLEMAN 1680 SHADYUOOO ROAD HAYZATA NN 55391 38 17-117-23 21 0017 01690 SHADYUOCO RD JACK F RHODE JACK F RHODE 3155 NORTH SHORE DR HAYZATA NN 55391 PROP ADOR ONMER »IAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 30 17-117-23 21 OOIB 01710 SMADYUOOO RD HARRY L HEVER ETAL DALE C PALM 1710 SHAOVinOD RO HAYZATA rtl 55391 38 17-117-23 21 0019 01720 SHADYUOOO RD H 1 J KEENE MILL!AN H A JANICE H KEENE 1720 SHAOYHOOO RO ORONO MM 55391 TOTAL BATCH 002 00008 #1381 i 11 I,-' r # . 1r I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESEMTED ARE AH ACCURATE AHO TRUE REPHEStHTATlOH OF ItirORHATIOH AS IT APPEARS THIS OATE OH THE RECORDS OF THE HEiaiEPlM COUHTY OEPARIMEHT OF PROPERTY TAXATION. TO THE BEST OF MY KHUMLE06E AND DELIEF /OATE ARIMEIIT OF PROPERTY TAXATl f* JJ.o':d3 j it OOi D.. <cf/- ^L/vas^y/^ /^yi^d^yy' C2>/^/77<^7tx5 ---------:; V 7 . /y/ . c9-“%r / «s:vd z^ _____ -------------------/.«•./. ^->' . _____________ ~'-Cfic _-Z^ a-^y' C(X'Cy/C'^'^ I f < f # erJ ^ O “f b- ,1 <■:. . 1 / rM,•* ■4 4 1 y *I I ■/ L ■ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK zone: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' (75^^ 250-500' 500-10C0' Existing Hardcover in Zone • • Ai H ouse *::?o X <^0,0 - •S.P, 7?/ LENGTH WIDTH X = • J13 S.P. S'.S X = _____7S s.p. 7.^X P.S'■ '64 Ac’ S.P.^"'^&>^Txy X S.F. B.Garage X a s.p. y£~yS‘ C.D riveway X 33. c > 9 c> 7.S.F. X s.p. 0.Sidewalk X /^.o » 77,s.p. X /7T s.p. X s s.p. E.’at 10/ D eck X •s.p. p.Landscape «• X s.p. areas underlain BY (X s.p. PLASTIC SHEETING \K .s.p. (So,o s.p.U/0^L.C^ ------ 6. Other X • s.p. • Total H ardcover i • N Zone JFA^9Ci s.p. Total Property A rea IN Zone /AC>C^s.p. m m ^fT //,, ion - /9. -7 :% I HARDCOVER CALCULflTICN HORKSHEaT/ SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) ^ISO-SOO^SsOO^ Existing Hardcover in Zone ^ ^ O O i-a -1& A. H ouse ./S\ O Y ^ . B. • «LENGTH WIDTH ^tiSS"■^■7 K ^//tSy^OCCS" STsra^S A3 A 4.^ A? c-B. ✓ S7tO/^^UiII1S^.SCt s.c. C 0*/C4iS7S‘STCli^S /€S7r^/ii^/Vtfi^ UfACL (M bX >.11SIS’ - . ^3.0 ^/.‘7 B.Garage y C B. C.D rivewa -X s X • • fi.P. 0. • • Sidewalk X . B. X <?.B. E. X sr 5.B. ?ATI0/ D eck y • • • S.B. p.Landscape • X S.B. AREAS underlain BY X • fi.B. plastic SHEETING X • • * •• S.B. X G. Other - X • • S.P. • Ft /tf-ZJ' /f-/Z Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone .r, 0 • CD s S.F fTI__9s,Cm X 100 - /? % J f r iLi UMtOCCiVER^ CALCOLP n TiOM^ 6ir*rrt>AC,K^ ZOHG.r“«) o <L^ i31 T>fe.6r^)£rE.ti> UKRDroVlL FoTURt. 1 4 P»Hoobt M.z X ■=• *1^6 1 HfiubE Z.o ^5^,0 - 1 o f r ?3 ^TlP 1.^ ^: II.« « 13 «• P4 (iTE>t-^ k II'0 i1 i : 13 •• j i » • ^OR-fVC-rt KJ 0 w e. «j 1 _____________________L__ \ 6i o s.v^Ai_\<.t*V*0» N t 1 LfVKi05cAPC.*\ <^e.GA&. ) UKJDiJi^LAIW C E)V Plamjc f bwetTiHc. n / K1 0 Vlt- f --1 j ..... . i • : Total UXPtliCAM Lt m L \YL 2i5>Js; 617. Stlf^T . K Total *lRa>»E.ft.Tiy Att-EA »Nl 'IMJE tl OO^^eTt , fj. K i V >llX^aTT4Tb lolOd (»«.TTv • PWPeiVTy kftcA lu-z&MtL tkken V'ROM ^uRMtv ftv torrm <iRi>4^c(Vb ______ CALCULRTlOklb # "2_0 n/ C_ •> er A P* *T“ .PR.0P<?sE.t^ Wk.xtViC.d.s/G.rS-JFMltt^ Woobe uoose 6^Rr\Grt 6ii>e\.VALiPs_ t)R\ME.\NI\y ?4 PI PI P'i PlO Pl\ uIXn06cAPI. UKjQe.iXLAikj 9y PLl\«.ri^ bHEE.TlM4r / lip.If' 5< S6-(o =• ISl.O 1.0 ■7-0 ^ <11,0 'X‘1.1 >( ■^5.0 ;= s'na^ 3.0 as.o ^ ^5,0 \'\.D 'be 0 i 510.0 1-j ^ 10.0 = '/-’•O 8.0 11. = £76 UONE- Total U awdcov /lix »kj ^okig.2803 6<fr]Sl Total '^RoPtA.iy \Ki 2.o>je \ I L&OO ^ FT C> bwiTT 4-11 hOO T«optiLTy (viiEft lu idvit tikem fmh <S«ree9 ft; Cdefiw i,noKiBtB.w ' O -fit T7TT- J- i «♦ • ^r.: / .*/»L-i.T/ ! n > v> '••.■^^11 •••t \_tV M~ \ 0 k] ■:j 4^ '/V*vo* V...I !•. *• *# ' ’ .-3L 1- ------<». V i4 . j. *) rj V- ( \ \ •*,i x_ «»«>•• • - 1 . : i- » ■ i • • V • ••.1 . .-^ •»- / ^-: ,_ ,u--- .- *• -v_£VNT\ •/V’*vO’* . , _ .. it- ! ^ ; ^1 ■ ■ ~ -i^ — ■ .MvW. T /TN ‘.'V %''I I. #•' K»'’'?li'' i prf:] I |.',|M I • • »t ksDl'S??s». r»i ^11 li^lllill^-ur- *-m.(JtM'! fWMW ? 'Ml «i V I,' lei^, mi ipssfmrnmmm ' isi&mmi i !l IS IL'. m MUflfti jr :T • ^ -4 \ ^ i »i U) i: ; . - ‘ ■ *.n*^- A 7 . . • • ' f. •« -W "?'if V ‘T**?. * • • • • #• c. *• • • •• 1, ..i- •-t.!r*"' •i I. •• • • «ar # • -. — F E-L_^Y /N.T \ 0'. \ v.i N/ O ^ , 45 ^ i 1 » • Q) „ • r"" A - - • /^ i« fj .• i' U-**S*L '^'-ec/CN o I ^/cof^ :rr'’^yrir^ t I •*. 00 (7) 1 X V- v4»ui 1% » * i V . •*. S,!. . • ..^*: * ovc. CKtarnKiAr ^ m&*> i“ j; :;v*’TT^ .■ ■ •■-:-“-^=T'- 'ncv^e lxwTiijj^^TjiUDfc!i \oU -i :•• . *<4 :liiicKuy \STV1 LWMJGt E4 Vl \'7 ! TttU<bf- .,t>i»riM(i ftovriDlVuoMmu^ 1 V. 15 X U. ;Re l’c.pt' oij IX* •X,'* Emvy W Of I ■ \ii 1c «T* «»1 e 4< \2vl Kmil _ ,U: MP.5T PLftfiQ MIMUTBS OF THE PLAHHIEG COMMISSIOH MEETING FEBRUARY 21, 1989 ¥§MSsmMwithe natural "Minnesota farm-character" architecture which was a main reason he purchased the house. The Planning Commission, as a whole, concurred with Kel.'.ey's views that the addition would encroach too closely to the adjacent property to the west. Planning Commissioner Brown reiterated his belief that there we: ■» other alternatives. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed (Planning Commissioner Bellows departed at this time). for #1378, Curtis Ostrom. Motion, Ayes-5, Nays=0, Motion pass #1379 WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB 200 WAYZATA BLVD. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 8:37 P.M. - 8:38 P.M. « wor-oThe Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. The applicant was present for this matter. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by #1381 JACK RHODE ^1690 SHADYWOOD ROAD PUBLIC HEARING 8:39 P.M. - 8:45 P.M. wor.__ Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing ere duly noted. The applicant was present for this matter. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that ^Jli^o-TS'^^setbick involved a setback for new construction within the ° J?7ed a seroacK tor newarea, as well as a hardcover variance for new construction. Even thouoh there is a reduction in hardcover in the ()-75 zone, variance approval for new construction is required. The proposed structure will be 61' from the lakeshore. The second “toot wide, deck, will be 59- from the lakeshore The overall reduction of hardcover in the 0-75 area will be 3%. Chairman Kelley questioned whether the entire existing structure would be removed. Mabusth replied tha y rn> -fiiTrEW u I-'.- i; l! 4 •». >• ■ -I; " .'i-ii ‘iU • J t • * • • . H i : *• »*; . .. . * • I I' • I ■• S • ! 1 '■ • '•i t > •i 'i./* , I; >/ tu * , i V*. • ■ ;U'!l ;4f }'% ! •r i'■ i'li.'r .fU; •: ____________ < ■ . J •: ^^TTTITTTTT^ . j’i-. -f ^J • • I ^ •»■' 4 *' .*f r u I li' '•': ‘if I <1 ■'1 ^l! .1 t\ i i ;• • ’ : n yI .f *, • I : t .'ft • i ’ • K' * ’i w ' » ■'■ • . ft *»• 1 li' - 'i' ' hi'' S < M i'hb ^ 1 i ^ /- I, UR .1 ' f J /s V - / /u /T r *^1/ /aL / ^ ' •“ UH -'' '1 /. i N ; cirvr OF loRONO City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2593__________ Lakeshore Required Existing Existing Proposed Proposed Variance; Existing Proposed Existing Proposed setback: - 75' Principal Structure Accessory Structure Principal Structure Accessory Structure 55' 10' « 61' > 59* (second level deck extends 2' beyond lakefront of principal residence) Principal Structure Principal Structure Accessory Structure Accessory Structure 20' 14' 65' 16' or 26% or 18.6% or 86% or 21% (second story utter level deck) 2) Hardcover within the 0-75' Setback Area; Allowed « 0 s.f. Existing ■ 926 s.f. or 15.8% Proposed « 812 s.f. or 13.5% Total Reduction = 2.5% B) The application involves no need for a hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback area as applicant proposes removal of major portions of existing hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. C) The use of the existing foundation will provide less of an impact on the lakeshore property. D) The original structure was placed on the property prior to current standards for lakeshore development. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 i ' [ CITY^ \ OF tQHQNOl City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2593 __________ CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 to permit the construction of a new residence structure using the existirg foundation subject to the following conditions: 1. All hardcover scheduled tor removal must be completed prior to the final inspection by the Building staff for the new construction. 2. Applicant to provide a Highway Department permit for the relocated curb cut to the site. 3. Applicant or applicant's architect shall provide the Building staff with the engineering data or findings that confirm the existing foundation can sustain the proposed 2-story structure at the tim^e of application for a building permit. Applicant is hereby advised that, if for any reason unknown at this time, the existing foundation cannot be used, variance application #1381 shall be scheduled for further consideration before both the Planning Commission and the Council. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the oate of Council approval, or this resolution will expire on that date (March 13, 1990). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, ana shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his ' successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 5 1 CITY OF ORONaJ City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 259J__________ III. City of OROINO CITY OF QHapia RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2593__________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) /■S'ii-a wi4if and for said aooeared ■ C- KhUciJL----—;;—-r-z—r^rrrrr:.^/^ +-h<» fcareaoing 19s9 appeared ' and who executed the foregotng ^^ItrS^en^r'lid^iSS^gi? that he (they) executed the sa.e as his (their) free act and deec, /a ; /I NOTARY PUBLIC my commission EXPIRLb STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS . COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this __ _ _ _ _ __ ^?L°«or said County, ^sonaiiy appeareda Notary Public witnin and .or sai C be 198 , before me K?‘T=k’no ‘‘w!S",°;S Sat\ri ‘-re““”xe=uted°”ir"sVm” a. his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC my COMMISSION EXPIRES Page S of 5 I t c To: Prom: Date: Subject: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator February 12, 1990 #1492 Mark L. Gruss, 3285 Carman Poad - Variances - Public Hearing ) i i Zoning District - LR-IB Total Area ■ 15,706 s.f. approx. Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 - Averag«> lakeshore setback variance required for 8x29' addition. There is an approximate 8' encroachment of the setback line. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover variance. A) Review of hardcover within the 0-75' setback area: Total Area » 7,291 s.f. Existing Hardcover: Applicant's = 0 s.f. Staff's = 481.5 s.f. or 6.6% (no changes proposed) B) 75-250' setback area: Total Area =« 8,415 s.f. Existing Hardcover: Applicant's = 3,373 s.f. or 40% Staff's » 3,326.5 s.f. or 39.5% Proposed - 3,558.5 s.f. or 42.2% Variance » 232 s.f. or 2.75% List Of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit FI ■ Exhibit F2 • Exhibit C - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - Application Applicant's Addendum Plat Map Property Owners List Neighbor's Acknowledgement Sheet > 0-75' Hardcover Facts ■ 75-250' Hardcover Facts Hardcover Site Plan Floor Plan Staff Sketch 75' Setback Line Site Plan Designating Avg. Lakeshore Setback Line Review of Application - The applicant seeks both hardcover and average lakeshore setback line variances for the proposed 8x29' addition to the existing residence along the east side of the principal structure. There is no impact on the adjacent neighbor to the west as the addition does not encroach any closer to the lake- shore than the existing residence. I Zoning File #1492 February 12, 1990 Page 2 of 2 show only an expansion of that bedroom areas. The applicant at will Ve"a^iH®rf 1°^ an elevation to show but confir^ms that itwill be a single story of 8’x20’. As of this writinq. staff has most^effeJted adjacent neighbors, review Exhibit E, themost effected neighbor has reviewed the proposed Improvement. addendum, he notes the need for additional cited h^rd^Mos^as family. The applicant has not members J needs. Planning Commissionmembers may ask has the applicant explored all options for less"Vhan‘ /A®" expansion more feasible for^a property respond^ ®^®®* ^PP^^cant should be asked to Conf irmation of hardcover has been difficult as staff 4 <s oaseo on a 30 scale. The shoreline elevation has not been from^S^929 J^ei ev®at®<Vk cannot confirm measurementrrom a "29.4 elevation. The house at the east end does not ExhiM®t if’stead measures 34*. The roof design shown on xhiblt J, site plan by Walsh Bishop and Assoc, suggests even a aSd^roordesian®nf“^h*^^^®4 designates the overhangJo Jwf fK ^ ^® ®*isting structure, staff has attempted the 0 75^ «^f<3cover is now shown within iS the 75 250^ J^’^hlblt D and adjustments have been made Piann4nn’^^° Setback area hardcover calculations. If the Planning Commission feels comfortable in acting on the iStro^Vre^Svanable!^^ ^^® options of wi ?n^ -th^ Variifc; ;o°u J‘’cod%^7/e1:\7on^»J CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application A ff ■ fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address CAiLfil^ ■ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 2^10 2-? ^ / ItoTp im'Attach legal description to application if not included on SESIFr-mW.'®... required survey. UO’T T ^Lo<-K.co I C ou£. _ _ _ APPLICANT Name Phone (home) ^1!^’?')^^_ _ Phone (wor)c) C/ J**** Address: /2J. City: £Xc^C.^c/^- - Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Phone (home) Phone (wor)c) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT OSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property X Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $—O'O-^ Describe request in i gUp»rr/w Te> C c^0^(^.r VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setbac)c Variances ( Lot Width Front X _ Hardcover Side_ _ _Rear) Other I HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; a l It Up description of unusual property conditions required submittals W Completed Application Form Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain 348-3271? Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center C|7^ Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. j to incxuae (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. ^ 6. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. tl>ie application, please attach a separate list o£ a aaai 1 "“‘i^ied of this application,o. Aaaitional items as may be requested by City staff. A WoSlNG*cnPY^i??°v^-»S°^n^« COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR _ _SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this appli'catlon pTenZ bL'nfn” °°*= ”-P^«te if lihe above ^ , mi mm - - - - - - - - Uat6^_ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE rMueated^hv*Vlo^?^^^^ provide all information required or Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not coveted by original fee payment) and/or consultant exDenses applied is «^®^tifies that the infoiStationsupplied is true and correct ^ the ^st of his/her Jcnowledge. Applicant's Signature _ _ _ _ _ Date / — 2. T ~ owners signature ( (/ hereby ac)cowledges and agrees to this application and further SgeSts^ Com^lsaion^m^mh®"^9^°"^^ ^ property by City staff, consultants, tnriid"e^inca?ir»s re^t“ investlga- ^ner's Signature^ -------,____________ Oats /~ 2 T- go Applicant must tfavTa^ subm/Sls into the City offices 25 days before the thi?d^Son?i? o% " K commission Meetings are held ^n ?hethird Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled unah?A the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is authorized \a!nt meeting, please maJce arrangements to have an Office ol^!;n"changrprlSr'’?rt£e";e*etY„l^° ‘ FREMONT INDUSTRIES, INC PHONE: (612) 445-4121 FAX; (612) 496-3027 January 25, 1990 i V- City of orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, mn To Whoa It May Concern: regardlng^my res\dence^lt^V^B5*caraan"^^ d° hardcover rule has two bedrooas upstairs Thl^ us oad. The hoae presently wife and I „er. chadless; rSl that wa° h'.v?*" when ny^nd a 12 month old dauohter ^ have a four year old son th?ee^®h proposed iight°7oo°t ad^diVf^^^three bedrooms on the main floor. ' ^ addition would give us This^addition^SoiL^?aise%hat to^n^ai^ hardcover owners are aware of this \nd" hU%t>^ o®b%ctIons!"^ I thank you in advance for your consideration. Mark Gruss OFFfcts. Sha.00.,. MN 55379-9990 El LOS Angeles • Milwaukee ‘An Equal Opportunity Employer” Orlando • Quad Cities • Sioux FaUs*^°'* Giv/r I or I • •• c-J •••• • RUN DATE 01/24/90 BATCH 001 HENIIEPII! COONfY l-ROPtlUY IMFOnilATlOM SYiTEM PHOPtRTY OIWERS LIST REPORT NO. PiMJWOl PASE 1 PROP ADDR OttCR NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 20-117-23 14 0010 03245 CARMAN RO THOMAS P NELSON ETAL THOMAS P NELSON 3245 CARMAN RO EXCELSIOR EM 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0011 03265 CARMAN RD RAVMONO J KOSAK RAYMOEIO J KOSAK 3265 CARMAN ROAD SO EXCELSIOR MN 55331 33 20-117-23 14 0012 03275 CARMAN RD S0.1AMAE G HALLADAY SORAMAE G lULLAOAY 3275 CARMAN ROAD EXCELSIOR IM 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0013 03285 CARMAN RO MAO ORUSS MARK L A 6ERALYN M 6RUSS 3285 CARMAN RO EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0014 03295 CARMAN RD JUDITH M VAN NEST JUOIlll H VAN NEST 3295 CARMAN RO EXCELSIOR MN 55331 33 20-117-23 14 0015 03300 CARMAN RO JOAN E NIELSEN JOAE: E NIELSEN 3300 CARliAN ROAD EXCELSIOR IM £5331 38 20-117-23 14 0025 02655 KELLY AVE J H EUGSTER I C H EUCSTER JACK EU6STER/CAR0L M EUGSTER 6300 KNOLL OR EDINA »M 55436 TOTAL BATCH 001 00007 I CIRTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENFED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORNATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE CN THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION. TO THE BEST OF HY KNQHLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE ivasqc BY i o Adjacent Property Oimers* Acknowledgment Fora _______ of ^ ^ r C/iilhi /t>\ [print address] I (we) Hi<\uLAO,W Tprlnt najne(a)J have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at qQ, also referred to as Land Use Application No. _____. I (we) understand that In executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. /-f &M £ C> uj aj£ Property Owner / ^Date / Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. #149 HARDCOVER CALCULATIOfl WORKSHEET SETBACK zone: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' 50Q-10GO' Existing H ardcover in Zone A. House X s 0^7.v5 S.F. • • LENGTH WIDTH X a S.F. X S.F. •• y _ __ S.F. X S.F. 3. c. Gara Gc .......S.F. Dr IVEV.'AY • yc ._ ___ S.F. X • S.F. D> • • Sidewalk •3 X .) H. .. S.F. X _ S.F. X 9 S.F. E.?ATIO/ Deck X •S.F. F.Landscape X _ S1F • AREAS UNDERLAIN BY X S.F. plastic SHEETING X • • • _ S • Fa X _ S.F. G« CIther X • • - S.F. Total H ardcover • IN Zone S.F. Total Pnope«TY Area ih Zore 73-7/[T] VP/.■■ •B s.F. Ll X 100 « - % I I .1 HARDCOVER CALCULATIOfI WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75'50'“} 250-500' 500-1GC0' Existing H ardcover in Zone A. H ouse / r LENGTH A r X X B. Garage ':x / c. D riveway / "7 „ X . X - X . X D. Sidewalk E. Patio / D eck XU - X . X . X X F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING X X X G. O ther 2^ width / "5 2:2^ V/ /c> /r Total H ardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone Sc A V . ,'S.F. ■ ?> S.F..1 ^3 Cl . V * / •i S.F. VX2- •.-V S.F,• •• / _ S.F. S.F. __^ ^ S.F. S.F. 1 s.f.TT- <>-»■<• S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. lA ^/r S.F.B a ?y/r X100- % S ^*1' /000|TI6»' = 135, \ .*•■ *!(• • • •* i.‘f “ ‘. M TV -I •>• •• . 5 V. f •»>... • V / f• • » i • w *’•• • •;’•;•••■''■• r 3'5V • '.* < f. * • • • . ••.' V .fi f. .! >.i»; • . t • < t • •:'. ‘I . •• ■ •' 'i^ •••;■♦■ 3 . , • •• • ‘i. ■> t \ ' * •• • • / _ i « * • \ i *•f,* • ^. V- /c/g J rs^ -sr^C..‘A:., 'v**^ ' If ■j '.. f .).#■ \ ■ ■ *•*• * ' • ' '-1-4..' r**^ ■ •> v- r’’ -* ''l;.x . ^ X tp' / • r^’ry^ Krp -.'4<‘I v' v,-/•. • PA-***< ^ T '’m*•• . • n • • 4 I ^ • - r **. * * • 1 • •'*' i<e V. .=.• • . • : . ••• r . I • • •’• • * •',: r' '•• • J':- f ' i'.Vl * • ..« 7*;. • I fjjr .Nb^H • . T • i • ^ I ■■■ «.;■;.'P”'' ■g;*>J»*t;j'y:_ki:v.; I * • |j n.tt^ ^ f ft ft ., .1 ^hj^bj^rAttify th.t thts ii ^ ^ ? •nd'correct representation ’ '•^k‘A ^ ' •"*^l‘bu??SJS; “* thi' locailoi __________ 1975. • .#• • • • ^ • H: . ‘ . .= ‘ M . . *. ^ . t ‘ .4. ... . , V- 4 , • -------------—■ * • . •, • • • • . . • / . ' • ; f • » *.r . ^ V lb *.A ’ • . To:Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson n. Proa:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:February 13, 1990 Subject: #1493 Chuck Downey, 2665 Casco Point Road Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover. 0-75' Setback Area ■ 4,500 s.f. Existing Hardcover = 550 s.f. or 12.2% (no change proposed) 75-250' Setback Area = 8,350 s.f. Allowed = 2,087.5 s.f. or 25% Existing per Applicant's Site Plan » 3,760 s.f. or 45% Existing per Staff's Inspection = 4,363 s.f. or 52%*^ Proposed * 4,393 s.f. or 52.6%*^ *1 House = 1,544 s.f. 1982 Garage Addition = 624 s.f. Driveway/Parking Area * 1,030 s.f. Patio = 580 s.f. Sidewalks *-• 548 s.f. Retaining Wall « 126 s.f. 114 s.f. of entry/porch structure 84 s.f. existing non-structural hardcover 30 s.f. net increase of hardcover List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit F G H I J Application Plat Map Property Owners List Council Minutes 10/13/82 Survey/Site Plan Submitted by Applicant Front/Street Elevation Foundation Plan 1st Floor Plan Entry Section Revised Site Plan - Staff I ! In 1982 the applicant received approval of setback and hardcover variances for an expansion of the existing detached garage. The survey submitted for that review reflects hardcover at 45%. Applicant was not required to remove existing excesses of hardcover for the variance approval. In reviewing the 1982 survey, the second story deck is not shown. Staff has no record of a permit being issued since 1982 for the second story deck. Applicant should be asked to advise of the status of the deck. r ) Zoning File #1493 February 13, 1990 Page 2 of 2 Review of Current Application -> The current application involves an entry addition to the street side of the existing structure requiring no setback variances. The entry addition consists of a 7'll"x6' porch with roof and an enclosed entry room ll'x6’(review Exhibit H). The entry structure will be placed over 84 s.f. of existing non- structural hardcover for a net increase of 30 s.f. of hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. ' Staff has placed existing hardcover at 4,363 s.f. or 52%. There have been expansions of the paved gravel area adjacent to the street in addition to a sidewalk from parking area to sidewalk adjacent to house. Please review hardship cited by applicant on face of application. Applicant notes of need to provide an entry as a shield/buffer from outside weather upon direct entry to kitchen. Options of Action - Denial. If denied, please refer to Section 10.08 for the necessary findings of fact; or Approval. If approved, a hardcover variance increase of 30 s.f. or .6% would be required. The Planning Commission may consider conditioning approval on removal of excesses of hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. The Planning Commission should be prepared to provide guidelines for applicant as to a reasonable percentage of hardcover to be removed. -^Iqci6 CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address -y / / -4 A L- ■ rt j /. . 1 .! ^ - t' / Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) P^ - 1 Lit L>0(-ru n~7 ^ 3 P 3 - 0 cm OF om cmJl P iS"J Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Phone (home) Name I' n • 1 _ ___________ Address: ‘‘ ^ ^ ‘ ' I"' I <* City; /. Phone (vork) 7 ' / *Zip; 3T 3*^/ OWNER (if different than applicant) N^une_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone (wor)c) Address:City;Zip: Date Property Acquired V*77t$'(month/year) I (do) Cd^no£) also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT USB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District - Present Use of Property __ _ __Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ / 5'DO ' Describe request in detail: £»>^7TVt(/fi^^_c(4- ^ VARIANCES REQUIRED _ _ _ Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear) Other • •• . HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations tiO«:/ggctc.v I'C ljzajo Ac-<'4 tr ’Tt) •'.ari-e-c PA^ny\ DESCRIPTION OP ONUSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: >Y^ >rf=- (-f?r 0<:->«»S >c<:>r 2. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form ' Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application^ please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not coaplete if the above information has not been includ^l Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete Initialed by Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator# agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application# and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature^^^, O Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff# consultants# agents# Commission members# and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting# please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ____ y RUN DATE 01/26/90 BATCH 004 HEM4EPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0K4ERS LIST PROP AODR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR 04NER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR SB 20-117-25 25 0001 00050 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO BEVERLY SMERLING BEVERLY SMERLING 2552 N LAKE OF ISLES PKHY MPLS HN 55405 50 20-117-25 25 0004 02697 CASCO POINT RD A A C KANE A LAHRENCE KANE 2697 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA MN 55591 50 20-117-25 25 0021 02665 CASCO POINT RD BENNETT C OOHNEY A HIFE BENNETT C DOHNEY 2665 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA MN 55591 50 20-117-25 24 0002 02660 CASCO POINT RD V A G DULLER VERNON J DULLER 2660 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA MN 55591 50 20-117-25 24 0020 02750 CASCO POINT RO DALE A CHRISTENSEN A HIFE DALE A CHRISTENSEN 2750 CASCO POirfT RD HAYZATA MN 55591 50 20-117-25 24 0050 02645 CASCO POINT RO N J GREENE A A K GREENE NORMA GREENE A ALAN GREENE 2645 CASCO POINT ROAD NAYZATA MN 55591 30 20-117-23 23 0002 02691 CASCO POINT RD ROBERT K HUNT ETAL ROBERT K HUNT 2691 CASCO PT RD NAYZATA MN 55391 36 20-117-23 23 0005 02715 CASCO POINT RO TAD ERNIN TERRY A A DOROTHY L ERHIN 2715 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA MN 55391 36 20-117-23 2? 0022 02659 CASCO POINT RO S S STANDA A I S STANOA S S STANDA A 1 S STA440A 2659 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA MI4 55391 36 20-117-23 24 0003 02664 CASCO POINT RD THEODORE C 0At4TlS DAVID RUNKLE 2664 CASCO PT RD SO HAYZATA MN 55391 36 20-117-23 24 0021 02710 CASCO POINT RD C H A D J PALMER CURTIS H A BARBARA J PALMER 2710 CASCO P0ir4T RO HAYZATA rt4 55391 36 20-117-23 24 0031 02635 CASCO POI44T RO MARILYN B THORNE ET AL MARILYN B THORNE 2635 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA m 55391 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 12 30 20-117-23 25 0005 02695 CASCO POiriT RO 0 A P LEE 0 E F A P R LEE 2695 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA 494 55391 36 20-117-23 23 0020 02677 CASCO P0144T RD TYRONE A BUCEY A tULA DUCEY TYRONE A A MILA BUCEY 2677 CASCO PT RD lUYZATA MN 55391 30 20-117-23 24 0001 02664 CASCO POINT RO THEODORE C OA44TIS DAVID RUT4KLE 2684 CASCO POINT RO 4UYZATA til 55391 36 20-117-23 24 0004 02666 CASCO POINT RO THEODORE C DANTIS DAVID RUNKLE 2664 CASCO POINT RO LUYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0029 02649 CASCO POINT RO J A J SCHERVEN JON SCHERVEN 2649 CASCO POINT RO BOX 120 4UVARRE MN 55392 36 20-117-25 24 0032 02623 CASCO POI44T RO JAN STINSON JAMES L A NAOMI L STINSON 2623 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 RUN DATE 01/2A/M MEMiEPlN CCXJMTY PROPERTY IHFORMATIOII SYSTEM PROPERTY OMiERS LIST REPORT NO. P14J5A0I PAGE 15 BATCH 004 PROP AODR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR SO 20-117-23 24 0035 02617 CASCO POINT RO 6 L HARQUAROT/J M MARQUAROT GARY L A JOAN M HAROUARDT 2617 CASCO POINT RD HAVZATA MN 55591 38 20-117-25 24 0038 02618 CASCO POINT RO JOYCE A THEOT JOYCE A THEOT 2618 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA I'M 55591 38 20-117-23 24 0039 02648 CASCO POINT RO J H S B J ESSEN JEFFREY t BARBARA ESSEN 2648 CASCO PT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 PROP AODR OHTCR NAME TAXPAYER N7.-^' *00R 38 20-117-23 24 0046 02691 ETHEL AVE DOROTHY L KEARNS DOROTHY L KEARNS 2691 ETHEL AVE HAYZATA MN 55591 TOTAL BATCH 004 00022 J I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE All ACCURATE AND TWE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OEPARTIIEMT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF HY KNOHLEOGE AND BELIEF. BATE l-cTf ^0 By 'i£LLs 1 *6 Cortt fi (!atc of Survey for n. riiiirU!:? Uov.noy or |/)t 1%, Sprliiii Park li.jnru-f.DJn ('ounly, Miini.i&otu 5 Vv n . i t f .• • I • / yS t^O f»u\ 9cfbaci« fufic 03^0 t 9^ // nr«a 35001 ft 4Z7o/urJc.ov^r'(^9i5l,rii|j ^3 n *n f»tt*po»€j qatat^t aUtl^n 45 7« Ka^tlco vcr /pf ojjovfd ) 1 hereby certify U^it ihia ia n fruu and correct representation oj u juirvoy of U.o Loundarles of Scale t I" = 30' Date I 9-7-H? o ■* I Iron aorkcr ^4* 0 l l#iii*Vvjyor and Planner Lnrijj L*kt», Ulnnosotii CO <■ »■ < /1- '' ^ ‘ i I . . r. [ **r,, i*. I- WayzaU Boulavard la, MiniMaota 5S391 -^rt^ t^levati 6n 1/4' /'r>“-------— ►r I.• •A;r.^.i ^ \ * Design I'lesource Gi oud I a residence for: 74t6 ktajor Avofuja tiofiii L4#ja ii»j rr««^ 11^_ 7416 Major Avoiuja No. Ui Mpl«. UN 55443 ‘I/,,. n t>. filli ./ i.r.li , ; AnanTEcrs • designehs ■ ^ I>6WM£r rnttmtOi • >,. i Bus. (C12) 5CG-3071 ___I C^w //raov -_______Fax.(C12) 551-13G1 UATE:DRAWN CHECKED; ......... »I ■>. SETS IS -( B>»t> -St b a 'vO ’*>3 ’ ^*^rt Iric^i to of Survey • or f, Chnrlon Dovnoy of ty-t 130 f Sprlnp Park Ilf'nncpJn Coiinty, Mlnn«Bota (cfT 'CO)<2{^ ' IZOSO <4’ S«ft>ac.t; forte BJ50 < 94 u ,r,a J5.TOI M f> lierJtove,f.„,|,V»j) «7» fiardco</fi'(er,*»,„,^j 1 horety rortH> that U.J'. in „ |p,„. u6rs^rinT";i^rk'^u;’‘r: ^ ^ location of a proporH ‘'<’nUriR N-t. • troor, and tho proposed J ioC^ Of Scale: Date : o • : 9-7-8? Iron .irrkor - AuL.(f \ e/.C fr''P H. foffln Reg>«CteSZ L'lvl Curveyor and Plannor I'l'*®, lUnnosotn / J. To: Proa: Date: Subject Mayor Grabek s Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth» Building s Zoning Administrator February 14, 1990 #1494 Francis S. Lightly, 3585 Frederick Street - Variances - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 - A) Encroachment of average lakeshore setback line determined from line drawn from closest projections of principal residences to lakeshore: 1, Structural Addition = 16' 2. Pool/Patio = 34' B) Encroachment of average lakeshore setback line determined from line drawn from closest projection of second story deck with railings: 1. structural Addition » 10' 2. Pool/Patio = 28' *1 Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 within 75-250' setback area. A) 0-75' setback area » No hardcover - Hardcover variances required 2,575 s.f. B) 75-250' setback area * 14,520 s.f. Allowed = 3,630 s.f. or 25% Existing = 6,791 s.f. or 47% . Proposed = 6,582 s.f. or 45%* Net Reduction = 209 s.f. or 2%*-^ C) 250-500' setback area » 4,065 s.f. Allowed « 1,212.5 s.f. or 30% Existing ** 960 s.f. or 24% (no change proposed) Existing structural hardcover within 75-250' setback area = 1,590 s.f. or 11%; Proposed structural hardcover « 2,340 s.f. or 16%; Net increase of 750 s.f. or 5.16%. A) 660 s.f. or 4.54% of paved area in street yard to be removed; B) Water retention area of pool is not considered hardcover. Zoning File #1494 February 14, 1990 Page 2 of 4 Section 10.06, Subdivision 15 (A) - (review Exhibit M) Overhang area of roof exceeds 1 1/2'; overhang is shown at 3 1/2* 10* side setback must be maintained from the edge of the roof line. In reviewing Exhibit P, the roof line appears to be 10* from the east side lot line. Applicant s architect should confirm. Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (C) - grade level patio/terrace areas that do not extend above the height of the ground floor level of the principal building are not considered an encroachment of required yard area but under no condition shall they extend closer than 2 . proposes a 9* setback from the grade level cement patio area adjacent to pool. Please note, applicant does not propose fencing in pool area. Lot coverage considerations are net applicable. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - Exhibit K - Exhibit L - Exhibit M - Exhibit N - Exhibit 0 - Exhibit P - Exhibit Q - Application Applicant's Addendum Property Owners List Plat Map , ^ ^ „Adjacent Property Owner's Acknowledgement Form Letter from Laureen Braaten and John McLeod (neighbor to east of subject property) Existing Hardcover 75-250' Setback Area Proposed Hardcover 75-250' Setback Area Existing Hardcover 250-500' Setback Area Proposed Hardcover 250-500' Setback Area Existing Structural Hardcover 75-250' Setback Area Proposed structural Hardcover 75-250 Setback Area Elevations First Floor Plan Second Floor Plan site Plan Survey Review of Application - The applicant proposes an addition to the lakeside of the existing structure requiring an average lakeshore setback and hardcover variances as set forth in the factual findings above. The structural improvements consist of a first floor great room, storage and vestibule area and a second story loft expansion and deck expansion along the east side or over first floor vestibule area. Other improvements consist of a 32'xl2' pool with concrete patio. A porch with steps is proposed along the west side of the great room providing access to the pool area. r: zoning File #1494 February 14, 1990 Page 3 of 4 Staff has designated 2 average setback lines based on the setbacks of the principal structures and on the setbacks of the 2nd story decks with railings of the houses on adjacent lots. Note that we are dealing with the setbacks not only of the structure, but of the grade level pool and patio area. No fencing is proposed around the pool. There is no encroachment of the 75' setback area proposed. The increases in hardcover resulting from the proposed lakeside improvements have been matched within the same setback area by removals of 660 s.f. of non-structural hardcover in the street yard. Please review Exhibit F, the neighbor most impacted by the proposed improvements claims their opposition to the proposal. The neighbors suggest that possible landscaping could remedy the above concerns. Please review Exhibit B, the applicant's consultants plan to present elevation drawings and aerials to assist members in determing the extent of the impact of the encroachment of the average setback line. In that same addendum, the applicant notes the following hardships and unusual property conditions: 1. The property is a narrrow, triangular shaped lot with house located in the center of the lot preventing expansion to the side. 2. Interior design of house makes expansion to the street side of the house impractical. 3. Swimming pool and patio area requires southern exposure, and in addition, would allow full view of the pool area from the living areas of c.ie house for safety purposes. 4. Living areas in existing house are relatively small. The addition would improve the livabilty of the house. Please note the significant imcrease in value of the proposed project is not a concern of the City and has no bearing in this review. As of this writing, staff has heard nothing from the property owner to the west. Upon inspection of the site, members will notice the permanent or seasonal plantings along the west boundary minimizing the view impact for this property. Zoning File #1494 February 14r 1990 Page 4 of 4 In order to ^^etermine the impact^ upon^the^ east ^prop^ ^y owner, members i°qie story structure extending the west and of th^ the second story deck approximately 30 in ° ^ reaching 1' under the maximum with the highest point of As already noted, the height of the second story additional exhibits for consi^"?itlora\"t\Tm^%t^^^^^^ that^ill deal with the question of view impact. Options of Action - Benlal. If denied, please refer to Section 10.08 for the necessary findings of fact.or Approval. TO approve “ultur^”''Vo ’’oY and®pa?lo rrS^?®.'n^"®a"Va “r'dcref'£rlfn« within t^^^^ iiSIrov ’eoeJts wUhln fhe^'ukeshore yard and approve no other ^'’rVa® a‘„®d "n®o ®h»aVd®c®oU^ l:ith®ln®®the 0-75" setback area. Approval may be subject to the following: ^;or^y®"st®r®u®c\‘u"r%^P^o®r\rJro‘f?h%®l^^^^^^^^^^^^^ east lot line. ^...'ur.iT;!,r.v.i;cV line. Table. Finding =>PP\’fvi"“‘ “prov?k‘ng°'’a®PPUcanJ irth"®ad®d®l®tYo^na®^^®?re°"to°^or^'^\"t\®Jo®n®su^^.nts ?n order to revise plans. I CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION :2r On Initial Application Fee $175.00 JJ ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) .1 PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 3585 Frederick Street, Wayzata, MN 55391 cm OF orm .......'' 01/26/91 •r •w Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 20-117-23 12 0025 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Phone (home) 471-8660 Name Francis S. Lightly Phone (worlc) 474-8336 Address: 3585 Frederick Street________ City:Wayzata, MN Phone (home ) Zip: 55391 OWNER (if different than applicant) Name (same)Phone (worlc) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired October 1977 (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT DSB OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Residr .icial Present Use of Property Single Family Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ ICO,000.00 Describe request in detail: attached sheet ___________ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) Other Average lalceshore setback I HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zon.ing regulations; see attached DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _see attached _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade axe proposed. 6. SJcetches or plans of floor and elevation views. 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. _ mm mm ^m^m mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm ^m mm ^m mm m m mm mm mm mm mm ^m ^m mm mm mm ^m ^m ^m The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application ia not coaplete if the above Infomatlon has not been Included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all Information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the Information supplied is true and correct to the best o^;his/her )cnowledge.7 Applicant's Signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff# consultants# agents# Conunission members# and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verlfication^^^ this request. ^ ^ Owner's Signature Date ^^ Applicant mv it have all submittals . rto tiie City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Plann.tVii ' ommission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. App3> .u must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Conjr.iif«. •.ot and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. /- Francis S. Lightly 3585 Frederick Street, Wayzata MN ^ j DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST .1 i • ‘ we are proposing the installation of' a 384 square foot below grade swinnming pool with concrete decking as well as a 600 square foot single story addition and 150 square foot two story addition to the existing house. The majority of the pool, decking, and structural addition is located within an area which is an existing concrete patio. The existing house, patio, and most of the driveway as well as the proposed addition are within the 75-250 foot lakeshore setback zone. The existing hardcover calculation of this zone is 47%. A portion of the proposed concrete decking and house addition is outside of the existing patio area and has an impact on hardcover; however, we are proposing the removal of some existing hardcover on the east side of the house and in the driveway area resulting in a net hardcover reduction to 45% of total area. A portion of the single story addition exceeds the average lakeshore setback by approximately 13 feet maximum. By designing the floor level of this addition to be below existing ground level, limiting the addition to a single story and proposing a low pitched roof line we have minimized the view obstruction from neighboring houses. Through the use of aerial as well as ground level photographs we can shew that the design of the proposed addition in conjunction with existing vegetation and the curvature of the lakeshore result in no significant impact on lake views from adjacent properties. HARDSHIP/PRACTICAL DIFFICULTy/UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS There are several reasons for proposing the pool and house addition in the position and location being requested. 1) The property is a narrow, triangle-shaped lot with the existing house "crowded” into the center portion of the lot preventing any expansion to the sides. 2) The interior design of the existing house is such that an addition on the street side of the house would not be practical. Currently the garage, utility room, and 2 small bedrooms face toward the street. 3) The swimming pool is proposed on the south side of the house both for exposure to the sun and to allow ful1 view of the pool area from existing living areas of the house for safety purposes. 4) The "living" areas in the existing house are relatively small and the proposed addition would improve the livability of the house and also increase its value significantly. RUN DATE 09/15/69 BATCH 003 PROP ADDR ONTIER NAHE TAXPAYER NAIC/AODR PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 30 20-117-23 12 0015 02^155 CARMAt^ ST BRUCE H TEIK BRUCE H FEIK 2^55 CARMEN ST SO NAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 12 0018 03565 FREDERICK ST J S MCLEOD A L M BRAATEN JOHN MCLEOD/LAUREEN BRAATEN 3565 FREDERICK ST NAYZATA 55391 IIEItlEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OJtlERS LIST 30 20-117-23 12 0016 02969 CARMAN ST PAUL R OaOUILLETlE ET AL PAUL R BRCUILLETTE 2969 CARttAN ST HAYZA1A tU 55391 30 20-117-23 12 0019 05500 FREDERICK ST B A L riEHTora BRUCE 0 NEWTON 3580 FREDERICK ST NAYZATA MI4 55391 REPORT NO. PI935901 PAGE 9 38 20-117-23 12 0017 03555 FREDERICK ST WILBUR F ANDERSEN WILBUR F ANDERSEN 3555 FREDERICK ST NAYZATA m 55391 38 20-117-23 12 0020 02979 CASCO POINT RO LYLE A BUERKLE ETAL LYLE A BUERKLE 2979 CASCO POINT RD NAYZATA It4 55391 PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 20-117-23 12 0025 03585 FREDERICK ST S P A N D BUDZIhSKI FRANCIS S LIGHTLY 3505 FREDERICK ST NAYZATA MN 55391 30 20-117-23 21 0009 02980 CASCO POINT RD CORTLEN G CLOUTIER CORTLEN G CLOUTIER 2900 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA UN 55391 'J?/ - n.s'7 TOTAL BATCH 003 ooooa ^ i J| ■■ ( ) f 1 i I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. \JJj^OAT EF. . 'jr.zrt iinv zi Ae' ;§'xovE':%. / ,- '^-r/■ '■•■ .a ■ POINT PMX Of WlNSHlP*S subdivision OFiCT I, SPRING PARK «N0 Du *S»ON J! . ' ‘ • ^ % * ’• # A*®I; J ^ • • • •:• I "ti *.rn ■‘.'' A ♦ • .•■ k • • • • ••; i..: *v 4:^ . . ..• .4 ;•' .T* ^ v«»•.-•• •*.»' ■ ■ ••- ii .. . * “ < 4 . •. I I (we) Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement of f^ [print address![print name (s J f have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at _________________ also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acicnowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asJced to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. n T~/ : t ' “ r<’/-/ -'Property Owner Date 0 Date^^roperty Dwner f Jeanne A Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator City of Orono Planning Commission Re: 1^1494 Land Use Application We are apposed to the variance request for the proposed addition at 3585 Frederick Street for the following reasons: 1. The addition will protrude well beyond the uniform setback of neighboring homes disrupting the symmetrey of the area when viewed from the lake. 2. The addition will block our view to the west. We will be looking down cn a roof from our deck and into the addition from our lower level patio rather than out across a lawn to trees and the lake. This will diminish the appeal and value of our property. Perhaps some provision for landscaping could remedy the above concerns. Laureen Braaten .John McLeod 3565 Frederick Street W 944-5616 H 471-0048 FEB I 3 :: * • • • )!.1 I m u hardcover calculation mKSHEEZ.,,,^^ iT^zoNe: (CIRCLE O.E) 0-75' 250-500 ' 500-1000 ^^^st^Hardcovcs in Zone A. H ouse 4^("TlaiOtdr.f x - 1 length '^ width -----------------------X 91 ----------------------- X «• •-----------------------X ------------------------X s B.'lSjJwaf ^ c. D riveway ^ ------------— s ------------------ X — m f ^ s D. Sidewalk ^ A . l44ci, .. D eck -------------------------X — —* ■—^ _ S.f •• F.Landscape «AREAS ------— ^ —# UNDERUWNBY® * * nr , Y SHEETING • -----------------------; X -----------------------X s. Other ^ • Total H ardcover in Zone -—^eZZ3_L S.F. Total Property A rea in Zone ■ I44>:z^ .. [m^J3—■f(TI14-‘i,'2(0 V100. 41 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F, S 'D C' X -i. .ox ! . HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHE^ SETBACK ZONE £35:*Wit5HAr ^S^^BACK ZONE: (CIRCLE OHE) 0-75' ^p-250' ^RDCovER IN Zone 250-500' 500-1000 A. H ouse if- Opajch ^ ith JLENGTH MEvsJ Asi:::>c^ni ONJ 3. tiwWJjE _____________ X c. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio / Deck X X «% X F.Landscape AREAS underlain BY , , PLASTIC SHEETING 6. Other WIDTH Total H ardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone ie=IO S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. \'^A- S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (S.F. [X \A[’^'z^c:> S.F. |_B H L ] V-I- I I ‘ i X. I [T]i£i!i2!2=4U]\A^'2<o X100 • 4-^__ I HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET ZONE: (circle one) 0-75' 75-' Existin^Hardcover in Zone A. House B. Garage . c. D riveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio / D eck F.Landscape AREAS underlain BY PLASTIC SHEETING 6. Other LENGTH _ X WIDTH X__ X X _ X _ X X X ^50^^500-1000' s.p. S.F. s.p. S.F S.F. __________ S.F. ^6-^ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.P. Total H ardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone n:- UC:> 4 B X 100 •^6^0 _ S.F. S.F. _B 2.4- ~% i2 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250 2j^a ^c 5\'Er in Zone A. H ouse B. Garage . c. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio / Deck F,Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other LENGTH WIDTH . X _ X X X Total H ardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone 250-500'; 500-1000' S.F S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F _ S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % * V X S L ^ •I 4-O^S- S.F. B -rrr ^ X 100 ■ —^ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET • SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75'w5-25l txwfttto Hardcover in zone 3y 250-500' 500-1000' Ai HoU^r ^ K . B=10 S.F. LENGTH ^ WIDTH yt •S.F. X m • • S.F. X S.F. X a S.F. n, R ara ^p . X .S.F. • r. D riveway . k S.F. X • • • S.F. • n. .^fnPWAl K X S.F. X S.F. X .S.F. E. Ja TIO/ D eck X S.F. c-lAMn<:rAPP X • • S • Ft areas UNDERLAIN av . X a S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X m • S.F. X S.F. R. Other _ X S.F.• ^tTSL\cTue>^‘ Total Hardcover in Zone S.F. Total Property Area in Zone \4^*z.o S.F. I X 4 [Tl \4^'Z.o X100 u ;■% r HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET A. House 4 x_ _ _ LENGTH^ WIDTH X X X B. ftWWfiE _____________X c. D riveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio / D eck F.Landscape AREAS underlain BY , . plastic sheet I N<? X X X X X X X - X _ X 6. Other X X L Total H ardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone 250-500' 500-1000' 1‘5«=1C)S.F. •S.F. • • S.F. S.F. S.F. ~i^o S.F. S.F. \ -• • sIf. • S.F.« ,S.F. • S.F. •S.F. •S.F. S.F. • • S.F. • S.F. • S.F. • 14-^'^ • S.F. S.F.id Id\J]2^O i B X 100 ■ \ :oy/o I r-i 4 To:Planning Commiocion Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Pron: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth/ Building & Zoning Administrator February 13, 1990 Tentative Date for Joint Council/Planning Commission Meeting for agreed upon Saturday, March 10th, 8:30 a.m. PlLnlnl Planning Commission and Council. IsTfeLlbTe dihP determine if March 10thSaturday breakfast meeting is not acceptable. Planning Commission members should develop alternative dates for Council's consideration and action. The City Administrator's memo of February 5, 1990 has been diScJIlio^?”^ members review. Please note the items scheduled for * I 1 1 2590.1 TO: Mayor and City Council ‘ FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato'i DATE: February 5, 1990 SUBJECT: Joint Council/Planniag Commission Meeting ISSUE - 1. Decide when Council would like to meet with Planning Commission to discuss public/private roads. 2. Decide what other issues Council would like to have discussed at that meeting. INTRODUCTION - At the Council's January 22, 1990 Council meeting it was indicated during a discussion during the Mayor and Council Report th^^ Council would like to discuss the issue of public and private roads with the Planning Commission. In addition to taking the opportunity to discuss public and private roads it may be appropriate to include any of the following subjects: LMCD's Comprehensive Plan City of Orono Comprehensive Plan Updates Transportation Marina Controls City Facilities Design - Sewer and A date that may be open for many people would be Monday, March 5th. Alternate March dates would be: Tuesday the 6th Thursday the 8th Thursday the 15th Friday the 16th Wednesday the 21st Thursday the 22nd ALTERNATIVES - 1. Set March 5, 1990 as the cate. 2. Select an alternate date. 3. Table. 1 I V ! RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council set 6:00 pTMTrMondayr March 5, 1990 as the joint Planning Commission meeting to tentatively discuss: Public and Private Roads LMCD Comp Plan Direction Comprehensive Plan Updates Marinas City Facility Design , that the Council P.M. (box lunches included) to hold a joint Council/Planning Commission meeting. Ayes_, Nays _. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by establish Monday, March 5, 1990 at 6:00 — A A . — • ^ # Li Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Prom: Date: Subject Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building s Zoning Administrator February 16, 1990 #1496 Robert Waade, 998 Wildhurst Trail - Sketch Plan Review - No Public Hearing Required Pertinent Ordinance - Section 11.10, Subdivision 6, 7 and 8 - Purpose, requirements and recommendations for sketch plan reviews. Section 10.55, Subdivision 15 (A) 2 - Property is served with sewer and may receive credit of flood plan and wetlands area in order to meet minimum of 1 acre requirment, but at least 1/2 acre of dry contiguous land remains. Section 10.22, Subdivision 1, 75’ setback from 929.4. Average lakeshore setback for new construction. Section 10.21, Subdivision 2, - Hardcover allowances. It is the applicant's intention to remove all existing structures and to build 4 new residential structures on the proposed 4 lakeshore residential lots. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Application Location Map Wetland Map Flood Plain Map Map Locating Residences on Highview Lane Staff Sketch Sketch Plan Review of Application - Application involves a proposed subdivision of four lots within the LR-lB zoning district requiring a minimum of one acre in area. Total area = Wetlands » Dry a 6.54 acres 1.304 acres 5.23 acres (Flood Plan elevation of 931.5 has not been designated. Areas below 931.5 elevation located within the flood plain will likely be located within the designated wetlands. City Engineer and M.C.W.D. will make final determination.) I Zoning File #1496 February 16, 1990 Page 2 of 3 Review of Application - Mr. Waade proposes the 4 lot division of the former Cronstrom property. The property currently contains the former residence, caretaker house, and garage. The 6+ acre parcel is made up of 5 independent properties (review Exhibit B). Note property 5 is located within the waters of Forest Lake. Property 4 contains the principal residence and #2 contains both garage and caretaker units. The applicant has reviewed the question of access and applicant's responsibilities for upgrading roadways with the Public Works Director. Applicant will be responsible for construction of a road (possible public road dedication) from the intersection of Wildhurst Trail and Highview Lane through to the proposed cul-de-sac. It is the applicant's intent to have all 4 parcels served by newly improved Highview Lane. Please review Exhibit E, the plat map locating developed parcels served by Highview Lane. The seven residences are served by an unimproved 30' right-of-way currently maintained by residents. The applicant proposes rededicating 30* of additional right-of-way for Highview Lane. Drainage is a major concern for this property. Please review Exhibits C, D and ?. Major portions of the property are involved within the flood plain (those areas designated below 931.5 elevation) and a designated wetland. The wetland serves as a detention area for portions of this watershed prior to entering into the lake. Major drainage comes from the west over the roadway through a drainageway along the south lot line of Lot 4 (please review Exhibit F). Additional culverts are installed northward along Wildhurst Trail directing drainage to wetland. The property is sewered, applicant can seek directing credit for the wetland areas as long as 1/2 acre contiguous dry buildable envelope is maintained. The ordinance also requires that legal access must be provided to these limited sites. The access issue appears to be no problem based on the current proposal. The preliminary plan must designate the 931.5 elevation to determine the actual impact of the flood plain and wetland areas. Upon filing the preliminary subdivision application, the applicant must provide the necessary hydraulic information for the engineer to determine an appropriate elevation for the wetland area which would be at or above 931.5 elevation. Lot 4's building envelope will be severely Impacted by the wetland designation. It may be appropriate to allow Lot 4 to be served by the existing access off of Wildhurst Trail. The obvious building envelope will be to the southeast of the lot. It is difficult to determine the impact on Lot 3 by the information submitted to this date. There may be major impact if the wetland elevation is determined above the 931.5. I Zoning File #1496 February 16, 1990 Page 3 of 3 Hardcover standards would appear to not be a problem for this property as wetland and flood plain areas are included in the area allowances. It should be noted that Lot 1 as proposed would require a lot width variance as it does not meet the required 140' width to the rear of the front yard setback line at 35' in from the cul-de-sac. The Public Works Directos has advised that there is a lift station within proposed Lot 4. The City will ask that the lift station be located on the preliminary plat. The City will ask for utility easement over the lift station. Prior to applicant filing a formal subdivision application, staff would suggest that the flood plain elevation and resolve of the wetlands elevation be determined because of the potential impact on this 4 lot proposal. The Planning Commission should comment on the issue of the lot width of Lot 1. Approval would appear consistent with the previous actions of the City when dealing with the lots on cul- de-sac. If it is determined that there is enough dry buildable on Lots 3 and 4 to meet the 1/2 acre dry contiguous standard, would Plannir.'S Commission approve access to Lot 4 via Wildhurst Trail using existing driveway access? The Planning Commission may have other comments/directives for applicant prior to filing the formal subdivision application. A CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION ^ y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -—- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 998 WILDHURST TRAIL ft ■: • K * -r • <c_i K ■:>nnjr^ J J '4*^\# -a#- Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) _SEE SKETCH PLAN Please check one - Property X abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application APPLICANT Name ROBERT WAADE Phone (home) ^72-5822_ _ _ Phone (work)_ _ _ _ Address:998 WildhursC Trail City: O^'ono OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Phone (home) in tut uKvau Zio: PmXE OFFICELTgTTpnAfijW------ 01 CEH 150. Vi —em—ti 150. (K Phone (work) Address:City: kECEIf'T-miK YOU ----^OOi ■ R01T15:5 01/2d/9zip;__________ (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels SEE SKETCH PLAN Development Size Present Use (check) Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total/ all parcels Residential; no. of units _ _^ Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Zoning District LR -IB PROPOSAL X Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size; Proposed Use: (check) 1 Existing Units New Units Total Units Units per _ _ Acres 1 Acre sq peet Dry Buildable land I ■■ii————» * X Residential Other (specify) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 2. 3. 4. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ mm mm ^m mm mm mm mm mm ^ mm mm ^ mm mm mm mm ^ mm mm mm ^ mm mm mm ^ mm^mmmm ^ mm mm mm ^ mm mm mm mm mm ^m ^ mm mm mm « mm ^ mm m w ^ mm ^ mm ^ ^ mmmm ^m mm mm ^mm 3. Payment of fees (par)c fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FEES X Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) 300.00 + 20.00/Lot $150.00 250.00 250.00 Pinal Plat Review (Class III) •(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all enidltional fees established by ordinance. Applicant' s Signature , Owner's Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building S Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. /6 ^ r 1* u ;« Ml-'^:* T • • > • ^ r • • 1*0 0f J.r ItiJ . 4» fVI ?1 LANE -'D^ ~"Z£L «. frf; . # W'! O' 98 ,..4 ..2::4.xrj <Cv •V-l-ijfi' i3^ ;5i mti9 4* si _ •#. c ^ *' ' • •n» /ItfVMfrV s <5 Ey^^-jTs' .0^ ^•'1 r % ' *' I..I I. a ’3:/ rr I-' i« MMX- • »•__^ If .-^ • jr w *•« ^ -;r . jf I i- jSH> VA-<W , -X .» ^ \-. » » -♦> 4^fr. n i rr — - I \ [/ z' I • h i ^ •» II iij * • • Mk 's. / ?o. ?: S * 'I F»T*m: ^ i SS^ S t ii I ••••*• • UiT ir/i ■Visual ’i' . •- tfi. ^ I ri'ti«T7T ' *A • I z J - -----------.,.l « 9' r : ji! *,I ^ I ■ . * 0 Ik.I! : SS ■ .• '''T?!^• I • ; i‘i. i(- V i k Vi tSi. t . .iCjp it !> ' .i i j^ ;.kti '\. I 'A 1.:*^;: •..* ■ i'Mn ^ . clnmup'l S^J *1 f'r ri^^i ^•’ :^ f> >- 'Ji *I • ' il"|r :Sr' , ■; *-* / •»•> i' * ■> Ir'-Jlwi.' •iit ---» » ! '.''I ..^;ii ♦.J I.; {-■ ■'I •> 'h ^rji. * ^ ‘ ’••;« u* w ■ 4 > *v*» S' ♦ • • i’ V “i'P -‘ ’1^•^"v--. “ ' j "ia • ••f.;'r i \ '■'. ' Y " 1 Jr ' *'- .!.ff ■ * * i- •• I , ; - i*. iii::':iiil I U .1 • ■'■ To: Prom: Date: Subject Planning CoLission°chai?wl^ Members Orono Planninri Kelloy cuy •'^anne „abusth, February 15, j„„ Ad„i„utrator -- Ba.a.da .a - trict - RR.io Required // - '"'-lb PropoaarpUt^oVfT^t^ Pertinent Ordinance - requUe°mentV*and' ® i ^ i s 1 on 67^ Llsf ^ '"^co'nmendatlons fo^ sketch n/ “ P^J^Pose,I-ist of Exhibits reviews. Exhr^it B ~ mibif i: ^°-»bna B*hlbU H - .>lan°;rn\‘°c"olr®ior«7:'r® Pa™^ Piae EKhabat G - Sketch^ pi1„’"'"" - "idwast Portioa of «tv Review Of Application - Mr. McDowpI 1 « ^^a"lor ?l“l^ ^ana"Vbl^^T,^i;^be„;i„ sl;*tbrcTOa„::| conceptual plan, but have n^t^ bi^^n Proposed Exhfh?.^ bot that t'’hna^n°'o ‘be erdinanUs ’- '^'’o\ "f" ^bructu^ waT ■'’/o'"' ”iZ l^v” e! "alntenance Of |„‘i„'a,a‘ V”' "eet the required secUon since 1979, the aoDi^^ °*^'iinance^a^menrt ^y. TA\^: /a7„ ?3V7"-„77cr7f^ :e'et‘f„7 ^o?V'’®*P°°P°"e ”^1^7'li''® “®e*(thl f ♦ r Zoning File #1498 February 15, 1990 Page 2 of 2 Gaffron cautions that the majority of the site is 10%+ slopes and may present problems if mound systems are reguired. Lots 2, 3 and 4 dry buildabie area must be exclusive of designated wetland areas. Access is the crticlal issue for this subdivision review. Staff has been advised that the applicant does not wish a road extension to the south, nor to the west. Staff would ask members to review Exhibits B and F. Exhibit B should be familiar to Planning Commission members as it was used during the review of the White subdivision application in late 1988 (preliminary subdivision approval expired 9/89). The County found access to the property to be extremely difficult. The only acceptable access to the site was at the western edge of the property on Baystde Road. Access from North Shore Drive was not feasible to the White property. If the white property is to be subdivided at some future date, it would make good planning sense to acquire access to the White property through a west corridor from the subject property. Please review of Exhibit F, a conceptual road plan for this immediate area. It will be staff's strong recommendation to take a future linking access corridor to the south of the property to join in a future network of roadways linking North Shore Drive and North Arm Drive. Applicant need only provide future road outlots to the west and south. The plat itself may be a cul-de-sac road. Planning Commission should provide directives to the applicant concerning the following issues: 1.Future access corridors: A) to the west; B) to the south. 2. Will the City allow owner of Lot 7 (previously Lot 1), Bayview Farms to retain access onto Bayside Poad. 3. Resolve of structure referred to as pole barn: 75', 150' or will it remain as merely a storage structure? If it remains as a storage structure, it must be 50' in from the plat road. 4. Other issues raisea by the Planning Commission. L±1 Ll 44-CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLI^^N PROPERTY LOCATION c^rr&t^uak :\ A, *. ■» •.' O lo Site Address______'T V C /^ 'f- cm OF orm OFFICEIjSOOvOuOO'JV(A 01 SEV 150.00 Property Identification Number (P. I.D.) .% ' // /- ZJ'Z L, ~ ' nlu^oV LWl liVl Jllil Please check one - Property abstract or torrens? n '> /CVi..' Vw-/ / description to application,^ ♦ 1 APPLICANT Name /7 /{ /4<>^ Phone (home) y 'F o Phone (work) _ _Address‘;i city; C'Cc>,-jr, zip, OWNER (if different than applicant) r-^ — Phone (home) / Z fmm, / / Name J ‘- -5 ZJ Phone (work) ' J f' Address: iTi:; city: y 'list if more than one) 'Zip:r— f- -> ..VI); 1. / existing land use Number of Tax Parcels / Development Size Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check)Residential; no. of units Other (specify)_ _ _ Present Zoning District »< A' ' PROPOSAL __ Division for Tax Purposes _ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites? _ Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: /Existing Units New Units Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) / _ Total Units _ Units per *'-• Acres . Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential _ Other (specify) I ««MOH HATERI»L HEC.SSARY FOR COHPI.RTE PRBLIHXRRRY RFPLICRTIOR I' p?elimlnary'’piat*in£o™»'=i°''. on ‘^®''“*g'3*®i|hin'*350^'(you must obtain "• Siift b“H^/nnSJ-ou^«^ 348-3271). ,r,niication, please attach a separate list o ^’/ot^er%''«ons%ou wish notified of this appli^^^^ CettiTLtion by Yonin, Oepattment that Pteiiminaty Fiat hppiicatton ts 'a! s&c«til!«trof srt^4y or mylar iopies of formal plat. 3*. Title opinion. 4, Easements» Covenan » Letter of Credit.V Developers Agreement and Letter oi.5. Develop Application is complete. cation by zoning Department that Final P pp - - - - - - - -_ iSSng Official's signature_^^^__- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - T® Shetoh Plan Review (Class I, II * IH> subdivision of a lot Line Rearrangement preliminary Review (Class 1 P II Subdivision, preliminary Review (Class III and all non-resldential. V.150.00 250.00 250.00 300.00 + 20.00/Lot 150.00* - -- *(Plus any legai or ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ j red or Manning coission by ordinance, further agrees to pay all addition i ;'.•■.c,' . . y-C' -*:i_ pate - - - -Applicant's Signature ——' ^ Date P ~r' - • - Owner's Signature ^ Vii-ni- davs before the Applicant must have “^^^^"^"^^pJanninrCo^istion^Meeti^ngs^^ar^^ ?h?;d'Hond°^ nSe"l?a^;in7coi?ssion”“and Council" ^ ^ IZin to'VttVnd a^-J’/^“lfpprp\ac"e' a'nVVo a"?v\'se the Building s Zoning S?^rc:^r/thrs"ohrnre"tpior’'to tL mating. . ^ r. -^1 ,iiP 1 • --*- ^ ___,^Z ^ ;// "'••^ ^Pn -a---------- r:-/ / *V. \ \ '^‘*- -»~ • ■— ■*■ ' Ul i . ».;7- » 'll \ ‘-3 \ ■<!r « ^ s i / '/ <>w, ^ ✓ /o |\\\‘.-^i'' :-o j Y,v f A 09/n t ^ > *0-' 'I . •»S . •/**&s W 9 ■!f 7/r.I. • • 3'1 I'.i • ^'A :h _ ;•/'■ U 'ti: \ \ Q:: / 't-rO c*—3 ^ 1 ^ vO V’2•• >• V--^r-_ //^-r'- \ ^ kO‘ k:v o L.'^c-. ) . < > /-V -. / I ; '- ;)' ^V‘ . ' t '^\ j:** ■ . • y^V ►I-/C- >\!^S- )T r /-r--:viis 4 « • • •s -A' “VoO. O' '/i L'« -- --- Vl H'— .o-# I o::::•> \\-w — \ -y.-p -r3 r- ^risiscti A •} * C.. -.- mf' L^-.<W To: Prom: Date: Subject: Mayor Grabek s Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Berrhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator February 15, 1990 #1499 Peter P. Chow, 2505-07 Kelly Avenue - Conceptual Review - No Public Hearing Required /<A- Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.24, Subdivision 3 (A) - Duplex credit. Definition - 1 Duplex may be located on a single lot as a conditional use upon application therefore provided that public sanitary sower service is available, and the lot is adjacent to a commercial or industrial district, and the duplex is constructed within 200' of the commercial or industrial district. A duplex is defined as a two-family residential building. The applicant seeks conceptual direction from the Planning Commission prior to filing a formal conditional use permit for a duplex use that would propose the removal of existing duplex on Lot 3, Navarre Cove and replacing it with a new duplex unit. In addition, a zero lot line division is proposed that would allow owner occupied use. The formal application would require a conditional use permit and subdivision application. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Applicant's Addendum Exhibit C - RLS #1428 Exhibit D - Resolution Approving Plat of Navarre Cove Exhibit E - Plat of Navarre Cove 1979 Exhibit F - Survey Designating Existing Structure on Lot 3, Navarre Cove Exhibit G - Proposed Site Plan Review of the History of the Property - 1976 - Subdivision - RLS #1428 created 4 residential lots (review Exhibit C). Tracts B, C and D were for single family residential use. Tract A was approved with 3.5 total acres with an existing duplex unit. Refer to Exhibit G which designates location of subject duplex on property. Zoning File #1499 February 15, i990 Page 2 of 3 1977 - d.pleru„ul lir/'total'cri ’ 1979 - was al loft'd Yac'^e^^in'area^Uevilw^^LM <^uplexunit on Lot 3 of Navarre Cove wee ^ ^ ® duplex conforming use and subject to all pertinln? ^ legal non-argue that the duplex on lof P^'^^^^f’ent ordinances. One may adjacent to a commercial zone wae n^owlonger Immediately duplex on Lot 3 may have bTen eT ^ "0"-^0"fof'ning use. The substandard street setback at because of its always been referred ^ sub ject structure has has been there for over 40 years '^*1® f^ructure approved for Lots 1 and 5 of * * ^ero line division was question for the City now^ls^ wlll^thP^r4® the construction of I new duplex u„^ on a ''lit immediately adiacent to a ^ longercommercial zone-’ ® commercial zone nor within 200' of the standards^fVr^an^exiVtinq^structurp^^^ duplex creditbeen converted to a dnni fv «5 " Shadywood Road that had ^p?irfic-st™S S 3^^^/n*es “s"‘^^hV*d^up?Sx ^\Vc"tJr " fr-ovS;™ f^irun\^t ‘crij^ni=nV“.“?ro-''3 ‘€j hardcover standards of the^'hriB^'o'n?n,’df;Jkct*Uufir Issues for Consideration - |,vaS”-7^ the construction of a new duplex unit. variances for Zoning File #1499 February 15, 1990 Page 3 of 3 ____seeks conceptual direction from Planninq Commission before preparing a formal presentation for the filing Of a conditional use permit/subdivision application. if the ex7st?nrstr7cVure?"'®'"‘'®‘'" recommend for the approval of the What are the remaining options for the property: structure^^ variances for major upgrading of existing allow zero lot line subdivision; hoSliV™edra‘4*"scaVh. f ► ^ CIT": Ci» OKCitO “ l.\nd C3Z ?:io:?E*x'-Y LCCATio;; Sit-i Acdnso "^ToS-ol k'^elfy Au^ /'r^nc <¥P{nh ^ rrrv nc rorm ifAit Vt Ul tl/tfV rrooerzy IdenzificaciOA Xur.aer "l-O — IZ C0ja ‘o2'j'0^'‘ .. . Oi Zi 150.00 tcrr<2r. 150.00 ----------- KECEIP'T-miK YOU?il6S510 ccoi aoi.jw .*.• ..... ... f?xeas3 az^ucn xdgax cescripzio." zo appxxcazion iz ncz ir.c..uaeG ?leas.3 zaecd or.a - Prcpsrty _ _ _ _ abozrac; or \Zcr ConclLZzcaaX uso r.ppx...' -ui.cr.3 oaxy) on rocuiroG survey. VkJtZ X >• - - • • W« • 4 • PET^K C. Hcoj *'**Oi4*3 0*>«0 i^'cna iwo; 2317 0yr*nes C i z y iMiVingt'gn ka. j ^ p 5 ’5~3^3 __ T *• . > P*.Gn0 \ ."iC.T.G , ?r.of40 . L*C .rC G o -1/ n-zze ?ro^3^r^z.y..ytccuirec • '/ ^ M i G O i • A O vA A o O C a/«x 2 —• • - '• • -jj _ '• • • • • j A F^illLo — CO.v.. V73 J J - I\ inewal ?ee - 1/2 Currar.z yea 4*^ e "* A e c v«Fee ^ 0 o4A^.4.0 ViAWA«A.eiA4A oa w^waa aT ee X 4J 0 • U G a;a\ci.Ger* ci.ti.4 AA Qccoosoiry w ae ^ -»/• *.> .4. D V/ A O w o)waao.• a^ V Vi*..wite*w*4 f oC.“.CC / o ^ .4.5 o A v> G c,^ C4 D aV .a Ca ^ > • *Z h* O 4x .ij V4 A C V/c)‘a. 0 •■ .«•• e A * A . a1 AA « A. * . A AA A C> .A A «2 ^ *,aT 0 A ^ * 0% • jKJ » SJ U f)AaICaX.G 4 ‘\ ^ w .J « Ca w ^ or. .T. .4^' -•••La Sm Jt.ll^r.g - jsigncxccs ’v^ilanc; o C:.-a*'. incr, r»o ^wa 4^ ^ ^ «C 4.1 O * • O ^ w « -• _ • % • ^ . A. - . . 1/ re I.A • 4. ^ e WkA^A*Ab«* ^ ^4w4«*4A..A ?R2/?IZ> - aee fee schedule Ul’/loA A_»ydIC.\7I0T;o > • % <% ^ .L w • ’-* U i> 2 5 C . C 0 1150. O.l $ 5C.CO S250.C0 Co.T.zcrcral Size ’.’Ian .Review (f cons Vacazxcr. ulzant fees) ^.^iX S .««. w V ... V.cX .. ^ ^3.. Zauerr.Q.zz Vacazxon "izh Subdivision I<e zoning Appoals Nd *J .U J m Cu/Aer — aee A.ee jc..edule I ' i I / / « • i ! LfL->e ^^/,e.V7//hc p>^cT Present *Ji:e Presort*/P.3 s i. c. ‘3 r. i. Q L ^r«r»c^X?'rZOV CP PJZQCP3T ieribe .?'^u's-i:~ i urrK-^^/-' Ceseribe :t '-'7'-'^'^~ t!etail:'r'f=-=_ \ f16 /'iC C€.rrx=.^ :ij?/20inr;D s^bmiittalg ■ ♦ Ccn'.olstaci Aoolicabicn Porn. J] Cor'ti‘ied p'rcoerty Ow or? '-.'.cr of ownor-? within 3!C (you can c-' this list fro;;: .-lanneorn Cernov Peoarrnsnt of Pinancs A“6C3 Gevarn: Center ^tr.r.toc’, loon.'. s:’t?c onv-^^c .os !-lC' or-‘-nccr''osad to each of tho ” or. r.-.a abovo iisn v. ..rh no rorv.rn a-, c’r's;-. . C3r*i-iic3t3 c.f sur* ■ . Poocernohio str%*ey 'enistino and rrooo.snd contou.ra' :. - 1* aitoratiens involve chanr-s in aievarion ;<.;radi£;. Ccnotrtcr.-.on -'Ian, i.f aon-icaole .soo st.af; ^or recyaironon-.r'. '. ?.. a t As an ad.’.one'm to this arolioaticn, tlease attach a soya.’-a': } l.'.st *-'-o',7 r^-T^soris you wis.n not.'.frod of t.his aoolicatic". *13- i • • * «• o.ny c.r 1‘ho applicant a • d Proper reir.enbe'r rha.-: your applica ;ot bee.n inoludoc. Cwr.sr itiLcn 3s MS*" si.^n 'irii-S cic*?ii.C3^3on« PZ.G3 5S 'Z. ccr''?l3'-3 o.bcvG i.’i.fcr’n^’tiicn ;ortificaticr. bv Zoninc Pepartnont that Land Vse Application is conplote. Teninp Officials Signature 0.1 to \P.?.L.LC.'vNT' 3 PP.GHhirPP-P ,’.'.e apolicant horiby agrees to provide a ?. 1 infornation recur re-: or requested bv the Zoning Ad.T.inistrator, agrees to pay all foes ana/cr .nusual o;<oe"nsco i.ncurred in review of this aeplicaticn, a;'.d cerrrfies that -he infornaiion svnoli-ed is ir.cwlec'je. .•.colicant * s sicnature a*3c ro—T3C^ ^.3 ‘ir'.G oij a3s/r.G2r CA.v-v'Date / 2 - CWMERS SIGNATCPf! . j r The owner h.arsby acknowledges and agrees to thrs apprreatron and _ur_..er au~hor.'.zed reasonable entrv onto the property by City starf, co.nsultants, ■igentc, com.nission members, and Council members for purposes o. investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signa'^ure ______________________________________--------------------------------------------- .\oolicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Plannin'- Co.T.mission .Meeting. Planning Ccirmission Meetings are held on r.-.r h .month. Acolica.nts must be present at all schedulecthird Monday of each review .meetings of the Planning Ccm.missio.n and Council. If an applrcan; rs unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma.ke arrangem.ents to have an ^ ^ r*.13-horr.23d a<ren^ a^^3nd r.n vc*jr clacG and acvdcG ^ho .*3uildin? ^ ^or.-.* ‘-fice of th:.o cnanc^ prior .ae ^^Gorir/j. I l.niUS REALTY SERVICES 545 WEST 78th STREET. P.O. BOX 100 CHANMASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 934-4538 JllJZ/-' -r-f^ Date: To; From: January 26, 1990 •» »••• •» Jeanne Mabustli, Zoning Administrator Brad Johnson, Lotus Realty Services, as consultant to Peter Chow Re:25U5-07 Kel’y Avenue Redevelopnv^nt Program Property Owner Peter Chow gurrent Situation; Property is zoned LR-ID One Family Lakeshore Residential District and contains an old fire station converted to two dwelling units. The property consists of 47,260 scalar^ feet and 18 in reasonable repair but is under improved. The existing gilding would be very difficult to remotlel and suffers from- - - - - - - aiiu ouj.i.f-rs criom functional obsolescence. Single family »«d two familyTo^ercial zoning exists near the site. ^ existing structure and replace it with a new two family home, each unit containing 2500-3500 square feet. The new uilding would be positioned on the property to meet current set back requirements. The lot would be split in half at the common wall to facilitate financing and future transfer of the property. Each unit would be sold separately. The City IS being asked to grant a variance to perman*>ntly grandfather a two family use on the property. Continued cost of re^r to the property 13 becoming prohibitive, and any major rem^eling is not considered practical given the location of the building and its design. Mr. Chow feels a new building would better fit the architecture of e neighborhood, eliminate future maintenance coats, imorove the set back and added to the City's tax base. Sincerely, Lotus Realty Services, Inc. BCJ.'lp I » SiJRVEY *; \-----iVv' I ‘ Moa 9 cs99ere/^ m¥ Ju^t€$mf tmmJmBfIe W/v*f C€t» Mm My$C,0 y jKmrmiirtm p^^to^/o '. lajMOn^ ** - r • f V* *.r • t ^ aecordar.ca with th«» provlaiona of tlutas of 1949 as amondtidf I hi«ve scribed tract of land In tho County of HlnnesoU, to wit: Tract C, fUiiflsUired ••• of tho Raglatrar of Tltlea County of of which have bean carked by Judicial laikl- rona Case Ko. 1MB6, and Ihat the survey . delineation of asld survey, dated . 1976. ey wee approved and accopted by the City uetlng thareof held thla day of X J ■I ’*• - • ji. j< •r,, V*. »s 1;- •'ir.J V,♦ A « /- i -. • 0yy-'l^ L- * «^ .# ♦ 9 * ’.r VO fe>.v>: i.V. 'JU#** .... 1 T -* .-n ., -^; ■ .o:'. if't ^ * ‘ ■ i’ i'rX . -i**V V V: . -.r V- # • MTNliTES or A PIANNING COMMISSION MEFTINC HELD ON AUCUCT Ij; ’'^ ?AGB 2A resolution no. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PIAT OF NAVARRE COVE # ♦ N ••- *V v-A4*-.w.-r« i i •* A I* ---------------------------------------- organized aTe^^irL^' -^«%^r?a";.‘:f%S;;lL‘n^rSSn”io ‘S->^ - ^ • for a subdivi^io^plie bi'^KcUy^^venurDSol*^***’^?** •PPUcatim partnership, the aubdivlder; aJd Coopanr, • llalt«AA *•- the platti::^^f^iatJ:nrof tJellJ^: IfeS dedication to the Cfrv w ^ w/a. .4..'!.'. ^oe». nc (EUhliJ: "-” the use of "wetlanrf«" .. -i__® * *••: the use of "wetlands" a« .K ixmiMtloM on V described ch^el^ •’’°" °" '*« "I*' *»« *• •../?- 3. co"er::efara^Ti„?';rd::2:?j^?„j ‘:L“<>“««^ lota, which outlot is to be oi^ed and naliia£id*bi^i ^ 4.:v;7^ 5. lots in this plat. ■' ifyA**''''. 'V Creation of an area deslBnar*d «« «-u- A L*'•***’A'’^ which area is a la^nn!! -fr "* Pl*t'aa Outlot B the main body of Lake MinndtSJkay*ihlch^lJr*U%o be deeded to the City of Orono a public bSdy -r” s::irr.n's%'"’!rT• -> ■■to afford .=„,. m .-t 1 over UC. 2 and 0 J„d ln“J;v:“.J"Jrr,;Jr to. 3 - ► • ', * •' •» ■ aT » , * • «*L ■ • ' # ^ ' • .» . .. V •'' • * 4, " A, » • O - a IX *r. a •* m:*•* —• sT . : ♦**:»jl NV.;..' ' « •» •■' -.. • V, .*%! •'3. MINUTES OF A PLANNING Resolution No. Page 2 KTg^^^U:>y.<y ♦ «#>- ^.-.. ••>• r:^c '.wr^ .-li. • f . » NOW, r*!EREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City CouncU of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Navarre Cove. Hennepin Cour.fy, Minnesota: subject to the following conditions: . -s 1. The aforesaid plat shall be filed with the Hennepin ' County Recorder's Office on or before February 14, 1980 together with a certified original copy of this Reaoltttlm ,4> and executed copies of the Flowage and Conservation EasaaMncH Exhibit A. as noted above, and a quit elala deed to City of Orono for Outlet B attached as Exhibit B. 2. Public Notice that the existing duplex on Lot 3 is a legal non-conforming use of land pursuant to the *' ■'-1 current Zoning Code of the City of Orono. ' tr-:\ »*Rjr rv^s. Jt The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire If the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, It will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this day of 1979. Wtllia.n B. Van Nest, Mayor ATTEST: Walter R. Benson, Clerk/Admlnlatrator I -ir ». .AT,r m0tAk ^ff fUM '^#n»- uor». I s^vAts^ft A*M #f ^ •• «IM’» tl»t« -• Xmmt «g»k V*' • ‘*f»IS»^T**_^*f___ ««a i^^p* i*/t/J^ > i.; i -oe .W;.l?f4T MM E \\'\ \ ' * / i' V I •' • B X ^ \\U '' ' i • ' k \ \'J- \ '•'A' 1‘ \ -^\----------- ._i.r i \ M»« > • * ■ TW V\ I~-^m \ :>':r ' • \ /'■3m \ KA ; -..fe:Ju' *" 3 ':.' !lii^_t' > $ ■■' , \li\ V'^\ \\V:V 'V-3::^ \ J «ttk«NO »«•«§» «W- , v;Arfi I . i_j ' { ) r •- ■ ' '£5... •■ -'iS'-■'=- 'M2?» r ■ - I ' I Ji --' '^-v ■ ■ n' " m I I • ■=i>tnnri' " t*. • ' 4 v mm rnil«««* afe?*- ”0£ ■%. wa-:i]^^;f®4'-^i‘ *W. jr’i-s.J - ♦ ...-.,.^X.,:...^ ■ ■ " A> !• ! f-c ,• --r:v *3- ^:-:^ ^rr„,rVA,ttr *:j>. PREm ji? ,, r. -. ■•',^. 'w r ^. -i i-rt tir,} -■ .- '.,rr -... ;.,- ..^ ,-'X> i^‘ - -fUi ’ •' . j^' - r*. -■■■'Tt''" ■ .: ■ “'^'2 ”ir: