Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08-20-1990 Planning Packet
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, AUGUST 20, 1990 7:00 P.M. 1275 BR0NN ROAD SOOTH - COUNCIL CBAMBQtS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - J. Diann Goetten ATTENDANCE SCHEDULED PUBLIC H'.^ING 1. 7:00 p.m. #1573 Carol Kelly/James Massey, 3020, 3030 Casco Point Road - Preliminary Subjlivision 2. 7:30 p.m. #1571 JoAnn Grimes/James Hoffman, 4720 North Arm Drive West - Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements ACTION ITEMS Review of these items will commence between scheduled public hearings. 3. #1493 4. #1570 5. #1554 6. #1555 7. #1560 8. #1561 9. #1565 10. #1572 11. #1574 12. #1575 13. #1576 14. #1577 15. #1578 Chuck Downey - 2665 Casco Point Road - Variances - Referred Back to Planning Commission by Council for Further Review Chuck Downey - 2665 Casco Point Road - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing Timothy Gramentz - 4680 North Arm Drive - Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing Landstar, Inc. - 2501 Old Beach Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Continuation of Public Hearing John and Roberta Henrich - 4125 Highwood Road - Conditional Use Permit - Continuation of Public Hearing Christine Beck - 3820 Cherry Avenue - Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing Leesa and Richard Anderson - 3205 Crystal Bay Road - After-the-Fact Variances - Continuation of Public Hearing Guenther and Gertrud Noelting - 1060 Tonkawa Road - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing Jim and Susan Ronald - 2565 Dunwoody Avenue Variances - Public Hearing Judson Dayton - 1111 Tamarack Drive - Conditiional Use Permit - Public Hearing John and Kit Wojcik - 3310 Bayside Road Variance - Public Hearing Norman Torrison - 2250 Longview Circle Variance - Public Hearing A1 and Libbie Hopwood - 1205 Lakeview Avenue After-the-Fact Variances - Public Hearing PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, AUGUST 20, 1990 7:00 P.M ACTION ITEMS CONTINUED 16. #1579 17. #1580 Garry Everson - 4755 North Shore Drive - After-the-Fact Variances - Public Hearing Patty Plant - 2245 Watertown Road - Variance - Public Hearing 18. #1581 19. #1582 Robert Koehnen ~ 537 Hanlon Avenue Variance - Public Hearing Carol Burgess - 2800 Pheasant Road Variances - Public Hearing SKETCH PLAN REVIEW 20. #1558 21. #1583 H. Richard Zuckman - 3995 North Shore Drive Sketch Plan of PRD/Subdivision Marco Franklin - Baldur Park Road - Sketch Plan of PRD/Subdivision 22. COMMENTS OF PLANNING COMMISSION REP AT COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1990 ADDITIONAL ITEMS 23. Planning Conunission approval of minutes of July 16, 1990 meeting. 24. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the September 10, 1990 Council Meeting. ADJOURNMENT m I Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates O to G BonettTDQ PE RDOerr W fibscne. PE JOVeph C Andfflik. PE Mjr\nn L Sorvai^ PE Ricn^ E Turner. PE James C Oscn PE G<cnn R Cook. PE Tfyynas € Noyes. PE ftoeert G Scfnjrvcnt PE. Susan M EOenei. C PA Engineers & Architects Keitn A Goroon PE Rchaid W Poster PE Donaw C Bur^arOl. PE Jerry A BomOon. PE Mark A Hanson. P£ Teo K PiekJ. PE M<t^ T Raucmjnn. PE ttobe^ R PfWiehe. PE Oav^d O Loskou PE Thomas W Peterson. PE Mchaet C Lynch PE James R Maiand. PE icerviem P Anderson PE Mark R RK)#l PE Rot)crt C Russek. AJ.A Thomas E Angui PE Howvatd A Sanibrd. PE Daniel j Edgerron PE Mark A Seipi PE Phap j Caswen. PE ismaei Mamr^ PE Mark O vMifcl PE Thomas R AndersonAlA Gary F Ryianoer. PE Miles B Jensen PE L PhJbp Gravel tfi. PE Rene C Pfumaa AIA Agrees M Rmg. AlCP Jerry O Pertzsch. PE Cec*o Owver. PE Cranes A Enckson Leo M Pa^eisky Harlan M Oison August 15, 1990 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 5532** Attn: Jeanne Mabusth Re: Kelly Addition Our File No. 139-1373 Dear Jeanne: Ve have reviewed the revised plan for the Kelly Addition. The drainage ditch between lots 2 and 3 should be relocated to the property line in the area near the lake. This relocation would require excavation and grading in the 0-75' area of the shoreline. If this work is to be completed an erosion control plan should be provided. Drainage easements will be required over all lot lines and in any area where the drainage ditch moves away from property lines Please contact this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly. BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:dh grc/90 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chair’^an Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Pron: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date August 14, 1990 Subject: #1573 Carol Kelly/James Massey, 3020, 3030 Casco Point Rd, Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing Zoning District: LP-IC Total Area « 80,700 s.£. or 1.8 acres On June 11, 1990, the Council approved Carol Kelly's subdivision of a two lot plat, one riparian and one non-riparian. Since that approval. Miss Kelly and her immediate neighbor to the east have joined properties in a new subdivision application that will involve the creati'^n of one new riparian lot. The following ordinances are pertinent to this review: 1. Chapter 11, Class III Subdivision 2. Definitions from Chapter 10 and 11 Chapter 10 Definition 43: Lot width - maximum horizontal distance between the side lot line of a lot measured parallel to the front lot line and at the rear of the required front yard. Definition 78: Yard lakeshore - Yard lying between the natural ordinary high water mark on the lakeshore and the required lakeshore setback line for the full width of the lot. Definition 79: Yard rear - Yard line between the required rear yard setback line and rear line of the lot for the full width of the lot. On a lakeshore lot, the rear yard shall be the yard which fronts on the street lying between the street line of the lot and the required rear yard setback line. Chapter 11 Definition 24: Lot area - minimum Definition 28: Lot width; also Section 11.31 Lot Improvements Zoning File #1573 August 15, 1990 Page 2 3.Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover developed lots and for proposed new lot. “ Allowed for existing Lot 1 = 24,100 s.f. or .55 acres 75-250' Setback Area = 17,900 s.f Existing Hardcover = 4,735 s.f. or 26.4% Hardcover to be Removed = 275 s.f. (Area only included within boundaries of property and does not include areas within defined right-of-way of Casco Point Road) Proposed Hardcover = 4,460 s.f. or 24.9% Lot 2 = 25,500 s.f. Allowed Hardcover Within 75-250' Setback Area * 4,400 s.f. or 25% Lot 3 » 31,100 s.f. or .71 acres 75-250* Setback Area = 21,500 s.f. Proposed Hardcover = 4,463 s.f. or 20.7% (includes gravel drive and turnaround) 4.Section 10.55, Subdivision 15 (A-2) 1/2 acre of dry contiguous lands required for the building envelope Dry Contiguoug Building Envelope Proposed at 21.725 s.f. (See Exhibit E) Required = 21,780 s.f. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Application Property Owners List Plat Map Resolution #2816 Staff Sketch Preliminary Plat Review of Current Application - The applicants propose the division of their homestead properties to create an additional riparian lot. Please review Staff Sketch Exhibit E. The hatched area cannot be included as a dry contiguous area for Lot 2. The envelope is shy of approximately 55 s.f. The lot lines must be adjusted between 1 and 2 to provide for the additional 55 s.f. Hardcover within Lot 1 shall be maintained at or below the 25% allowance. The applicant proposes the removal of 275 s.f. of bituminous drive within defined boundaries of the private property and does not include the area within the right-of-way. Note the gravel drive that serves Lot 3 is now located within the boundaries of Lot 3. Existing hardcover is at a 20.7% allowed level. J Zoning File #1573 August 15, 1990 Page 3 PQview Definition Sections noted above. To be consistent with the procedures for requiring lot width at setback lines (i.e. required setback to rear of front setback line), the Code lacking clear direction as to the required width for a lot at the lakeshore has followed the same procedure for required lot widths for non-riparian lots. For consistency, lacking clear direction from the Code, the lot width (Lot 2) of 100* is met at the 75' setback mark. The existing irregular shoreline is approximately 75-85'. The Code does not require 100' at-. shoreline but would require the lot width at the lakeshore setback line. Please review the Staff Sketch Exhibit E. Note that the lot width to the rear of the proposed residence structure on Lot 2 is only 97'. Staff would ask for a realignment o the lot line so that a 100' width is maintained for the depth of the proposed building envelope, although the average setback line would define auilding envelope northward to the average lakeshore setback line. Note that your Code does not provide directives that would require a specific width for the depth of a building envelope. We have a clear need for a zoning amendment to provide clear guidelines for building envelopes. Staff would encourage members to review the lot standards for the specific zoning district and all pertinent sections of both ChapterrlO and 11 as noted above to confirm staff s findings. In the original two-lot subdivision, staff requested that the drainage ditch be realigned along the shared lot lines of the lot to the immediate east. Applicant has realigned the drainageway along the shared lines up to the existing drainageway that now intersects the building envelope of Lot 2. Rather than require the realignment of the drainageway along the newly proposed shared lot lines of 2 and 3 requiring a separate conditional use perinit and variance review# staff would recommend to the applicant and applicant's surveyor that the drainageway within Lot 2 remain as proposed and to require a lot line change between 1 and 2 to assure the 1/2 acre dry contiguous is satisfied. Options of Action Denial - If Planning Commission proposes denial, please refer to the necessary findings set forth in Chapter 11. Approval - If approved, the following findings may be considered; 1. The proposed division satisfied lot standards of the LR-IC zoning district. 2. This subdivision has been found to meet all pertinent standards of the subdivision regulations. 3. There is adequate sewer and water to serve the newly proposed lot. Zoning File #1573 August 15r 1990 Page 4 Approval is subject to the following conditions; 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Isv Upon application for a building permit for new construction on Lot 2, the future owner shall pay the following sewer and water fees; Sewer Unit Charge of $1,513.86 Water Unit Charge of $1,691.78 It should also be noted that this rate is based on the 1990 fee schedule and will be adjusted based on the inflationary rate in the 1991 fee schedule. Prior to scheduling the application before the Council, applicant's surveyor to provide an amended survey designating the following; a.Realign lot lines between Lots 1 and 2 so that there is a confirmation that a 1/2 acre dry contiguous envelope exists west of the proposed drainageway within Lot 2. b.Based on required lot line changes applicant's surveyor to provide amendev hardcover facts for Lots 1 and 3. This may be an optional condition and not based on requests of ordinances but does Planning ConMiiission recommend that the lot lines be adjusted so that there is a 100' width at the north edge of the defined building envelope -- or to average lakeshore setback line as depicted on Staff Sketch. Future owner of Lot 2 is hereby advised that hardcover within the 75-250' setback area is to be limited to 25%. Future dock to serve the newly created riparian Lot 2, shall meet the pertinent LMCD standards that determine the allowed boat density units at the dock based on 75-85' of lineal footage of shoreline. . . CITY OF ORONO - SOBDIVISION APPLICATION rJ ~ *' ■/ ^ \ • “ ” W^Ji^u ^ '.j PROPERTY LOCATION ^ Site Address k _ _ _ _ _ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) • UT • LI * > / • zo • »n L? • 4-5 oooi Please check one - Property X abstract or _______ torrens? Attach legal description to application. appT.rrANT .Uipro^.^ "P^Phone (home) _iuriri<xv.^x ^0^ C«iCo f^,nr lo Ai a. ^^ Name ^ ph^^e (work ) sy^ • 7 ^__ ------------------^ --------------1 ^7/- 7^.2-? ^ Address:eXo2t/o _______ City; Zip«_nX]3-^/----- OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)_________________ Neune •__________________________ Phone (work)_________________ „ . rTTV -,c nr.~H;riAddress: __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ City:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Zip: (attach list if more than one) ^ W' X uCit WI./V' a VV EXISTING LAND USE Jl 250.00 ^ HEulPf-lH^ YOU Number of Tax Parcels UiEz320 COOl i\01 711:43 07/26/90 Development Size _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Acres Dry Land __ _ _ _ _ _ Acres Wet Land \tT Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Residential; no. of units ^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Other (specify) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Present Zoning District _ _ _ _ _ PROPOSAL 3 _ _ _ Civision for Tax Purposes _ _ _ _ _ _■ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) I Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: ^_ _ _ Existing Units \ New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: ^ ^Units per _ _ Acres Minimum Lot Size: «>lS Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use; (check) _ _ Residential _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 2. 3. 4. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature__ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessi^ents). 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5.Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement $150.00 250.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision)250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential)300.00 + 20.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. RUN DATE 07/23/90 BATCH on HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435901 PAGE 12 PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 38 20-117-23 31 003S 02940 CASCO POINT RO S A DANIEL t E L BULLOCK E L BULLOCK ASA DANIEL 2940 CASCO PT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0036 02948 CASCO POINT RD ROBERT C LAPINSKI AND HIFE ROBERT C LAPINSKI 2948 CASCO POINT ROAD HAYZATA Hf4 55391 36 20-117-23 31 0038 02990 CASCO POINT RO 0 A J MORRIS BRADLEY C BAKKE 2990 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA m 55391 PROP ADDR 0I84ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR 36 20-117-23 31 0045 02975 CASCO POINT RO STEHART R PERRY STEHART R PERRY 2975 CASCO POINT ROAD HAYZATA HN 55391 36 20-117-23 31 0060 02970 CASCO POINT RO JAB HARTINS0t4 JERRY A BOtAlIE MARTiriSON 2970 CASCO POINT RO S HAYZATA tV4 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0061 02980 CASCO POINT RD C H HAACK A P MULLEN HAACK C H HAACK A P MULLEN HAACK 2960 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA MN 55391 PROP ADDR 0HI4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 36 20-117-23 31 0064 02967 CASCO POINT RO TAD ROZEBOOM THEODORE A DEBORAH ROZEBOOM 2967 CASCO PT RO HAYZATA HN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0070 00038 ADDRESS U4ASSIG44EO JAMES R A CATHERINE HARTZELL JAMES R A CATHERINE HARTZELL 127 MOOOLAFa) AVE ST PAUL m 55105 38 20-117-23 34 0001 03035 CASCO POINT RO T 8ERTHIAUME/C KACHEI4HEISTER THOMAS B BERTHIAUME 3035 CASCO P0It4T ROAD HAYZATA tU4 55391 PROP ADDR OFtCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 38 20-117-23 34 0002 03025 CASCO POINT RD HOHARO R/CAMILLA A ALTON JR ROBERT 6 HCGAFtl 3025 CASCO POINT RO S HAYZATA HN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0003 03015 CASCO POINT RO R G LAURIE ETAL R G LAURIE 3015 CASCO PT RD NAVZATA tttl 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0005 03095 CASCO POINT RD CURTIS J ENGLUNO ETAL CURTIS J ENGLUNO 3095 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA rV4 55391 PROP ADDR OFWER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 20-117-23 34 0010 03085 CASCO POINT RO GLORIA B OOTZENROTH BLANOA SHEOLUNP 3085 CASCO PT RO HAYZATA HN 55391 38 20-117-25 34 0011 03065 CASCO POINT RO R J JEROEE A J F JCRDEE ROBERT D t JEAtOtE JEROEE 3065 CASCO POINT HOAO HAYZATA Ttl 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0012 03045 CASCO POINT RO R A KASTENS SBC KASTENS RICHARD A/BARBARA C KASTENS 3045 CASCO POINT RO EUYZATA MN 55391 PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 38 20-117-23 34 6017 03061 CASCO POINT RO DORIS MOLI TOR-HATERS TODD HATERS 3061 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0018 03055 CASCO POINT RO JOHN P OEfINIS ETAL JOHN P S EVY C OINNIS 3055 CASCO POINT HOAD HAYZATA m 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0020 03020 CASCO POINT RD JOSEPH E BRAUN ET AL CAROL J KELLY 3020 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA m 55391 RUN DATE 07/23/90 •• I BATCH Oil PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OHT4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADOR OHNFR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OltaERS LIST 38 20-117-23 3^ 0023 02987 CASCO POINT RO JAMES R A CATHERINE HARTZELL JAMES R I CATHERINE HARTZELL 127 NOOOLAHN AVE ST PAUL MN 55105 38 20-117-23 ^2 0032 03509 IVY PL MARLENE DICK / PERSONAL REP THOMAS D COX 3509 IVY PLACE HAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0001 03030 CASCO POINT RD JAMES L MASSEY JAMES L MASSEY 3030 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA HN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0037 00038 ADDRESS Ur4ASSICr4EO STATE LAND DEPT ALVIN GLOVER 2585 XYLON AVE N MPLS MT4 55427 38 20-117-23 43 0044 03287 CASCO CIR DANA A HALMRAST DA4U A HALMRAST 3287 CASCO CIRCLE HAYZATA HN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0049 03309 C/ CIR L I J BRUSTAD LAHRENCE L BRUSTAD 3309 CASCO CIRCLE HAYZATA rt4 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0024 03005 CASCO POINT RO JAMES R A CATHERINE HARTZELL JAMES R I CATHERINE HARTZELL 127 H00DLAHr4 AVE ST PAUL MN 55105 38 20-117-23 42 0034 03545 IVY PL JEFFREY I DEBRA DANBERRY JEFFREY A DEBRA DANBERRY 3545 IVY PL HAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0035 03040 CASCO POINT RD J H HOGAN ETAL JOHN A SUSA44 MOGAN 4632 EMERSOrJ AVE S MPLS m 55409 38 20-117-23 43 0042 03277 CASCO CIR LEE GEINERT ETAL LEE GEINERT 3277 CASCO LANE HAYZATA MT4 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0045 03297 CASCO CIR DAM OAS DANIEL 0 A MADONNA J OAS 3297 CASCO CIRCLE HAYZATA MT4 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0051 03034 CASCO POINT RO GARY A BARR GARY A BARR 423 HERMOSITA OR ST PETE BEACH FL 33706 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 13 38 20-117-23 42 0029 03525 IVY PL D L CUMMir4GS A M M CUMMINGS DANIEL L A MARTHA M CUFtlINGS 3525 IVY PL HAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0035 03535 IVY PL THOMAS A BYRDINA CLAY BERNIER THOMAS J BERNIER 3535 IVY PL HANZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0036 03038 CASCO POIffT RD I P BOOTH A HIFE IAN P BOOTH 3038 CASCO PT RO HAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0043 03277 CASCO CIR LEE GEINERT ETAL LEE GEINERT 3277 CASCO LANE HAYZATA m 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0048 03305 CASCO CIR ECKARD MUENCK A HIFE ECKARO MUENCK 3305 CASCO CIRCLE HAYZATA m 55391 TOTAL BATCH Oil 00035 mJN DATE 07/25/90 BATCH Oil l . -ills Iff2 ■ If '-s iS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHttERS LIST REPORT NO. PI<^35A01 PAGE 14 .J I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HLIR4EPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDCE AND BELIEF* ^ . <.JdmhAi'i I/\Lk^ % ]C^OfO«pn r;T RQKfO^ City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2816 _________ A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OP A PLAT AT 3020 CASCO POINT ROAD PILE NO. 1531 WHEREAS, Carol J. Kelly on April 21, 1990 filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a 2- lot residential plat of property legally described as Tract T, Registered Land Survey #461, Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereinafter "the property") and; WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statues 462.358 et. seg. and the City of Orono Zoning and Platting Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 21, 1990 at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application v/ere given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on June 11, 1990 the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of the Carol J. Kelly (hereinafter the "subdivider"), noting the following findings of fact; 1. The property is located within the LR"1C Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 1/2 acre of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2. The property contains a total of approximately 1.09 acres, all of which is considered dry buildable land. 3. The proposed plat contains 2 lots meeting the required 1/2 acre dry contiguous lot area requirement. 4. Each lot meets the required lot width to the rear of the front yard setback line at 30': Lot 1 - the only legally recognized riparian lot meets the required lot width of 100' at the 75' lakeshore setback line. 5. Each lot can be residentially developed without the need for variances to the LR-IC standards. 6. The existing structural improvements on Lot 1 meet the required setback from the newly proposed division line. Page 1 of 4 CITY . OF ORONQ City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _ _^16 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon cne or more of th6 findings noted above# the City Council of the Ci^y of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat for Carol J. Kelly at the property located at 3020 Casco Point Road per the survey originally dated 5/21/90, revised 6/4/90 by Pete J. Knabb of Ron Krueger & Associates, Inc., subject to the following conditions: 1. The following improvements must be completed prior to final plat approval: a) Realignment of drainage ditch as shown on survey noted above. b) Removal of 923 square feet of existing hardcover on proposed Lot 1 as shown on the survey noted above (revised date 6/4/90). 2. Upon application for a building permit for new construction on Lot 2, the future owner shall pay the following sewer and water fees: Sewer unit charge Water unit charge $1,513.86 1,691.78 It should also be noted that this rate is based on the 1990 fee schedule and will be adjusted based on the inflationary rate for each annual fee schedule. 3. The subdivider shall execute a restrictive covenant to be drafted by the City to be filed against the chain of titles of Lots 1 and 2 denying all riparian access and use of the lake via Lot 1 by Lot 2 of this subdivision. 4. Current and future owner of Lot 1 is hereby advised that hardcover within the 75 “250' setback area is at maximum allowed level at 25%. Any additional improvements to this property resulting in increases in hardcover must be approved by the City of Orono and may result in equal or greater removal of existing hardcover. Page 2 of 4 J Sz;.Qe3:;i EQHQPiafl City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ^0. 2816 _________ FINAL PLAT SUBMITTALS The following lisL of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. The subdivider is hereby advised that preliminary approval will expire one year from the date of Council's approve of the preliminary plat (June 11/ 1991). A. RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1"=200'. Drawing to include: a) Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Peter J. Knabb of Ron Krueger & Associates, Inc. revised date 6/4/90. b) Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide along all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of internal property lines. c) Designation and dedication of a drainage easement within Lot 2 as shown on the plat drawings. Drainage easement to be shown 5' either side of drainage ditch. d) Designation and dedication of right-of-way of Casco Point Road. e) Name plat. B. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: a) Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b) The subdivider must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c) Signed and executed restrictive covenant prohib'>; t-ng riparian use of lake by Lot 2 via Lot 1. Cit^ to provide restrictive covenant for execution by subdivider. Page 3 of 4 • • t CITY OF ORONO J City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2816_ _ _ _ C. FEES TO BE PAID: Total Due $740.00 a) Park dedication fee per current schedule: Lot 2 e $440.00 b) Final plat fee = $150.00 c) Legal review and filing fees of $150.00 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 11th of June, 1990. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 11th day of June, 1990, by James R. Grabek & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor 6 City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Page 4 of 4 ia>ru.r^ y .•> i% V ‘ f A® > ‘V** * r V % • ' \ Vft •V'JT * r •■ ' • -,/.,•> . • ; \\;(V-!.i^^ ■ * ■■■ / . . •fV; » WifiL-f?: • •-. •I To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: August 10, 1990 #1571 JoAnn Grimes/James Hoffman 4720-4730 North Arm Drive West Easement Vacation - Public Hearing Application - Request to vacate drainage and utility easement as part of lot line rearrangement, Application #1564 List o£ Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Discussion Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Easement Descriptions As part of the approval for the subdivision of a lot line rearrangement between these two properties, the Planning Commission conditioned approval on vacation and rededication of the drainage easements along the existing and proposed lot lines. Easements to be vacated, and those to be rededicated, are described in Exhibit E. The new easements will follow the new lot line, being 5' either side of that line. As of this writing, we are unaware of any existing utilities within the existing easement to be vacated. Vacation and rededication of easements should have no impact on either property. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the vacation of easements as described, conditioned on applicants granting the appropriate new easements 5' either side of the new lot line. Isv // i*- 3 ifCITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND USB APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 4'?2.0 hfof f/l f-iiY\ OriUC. yi Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) r-TTV /-r T'CrsttLa t t Cl cMuitcL*vvAjrr rccrrcI j. r^r^ifci- Cl I xcu Please attach legal description on required survey. APPLICANT Name H- i "Vi ". !i-Wif'i a w'cv*:-wwv r‘r/ rr4vi ecuto application if not includ.^.v Ji • > U ?T cc • w r,-| M cv • vv c:tw-td T-. rw.^;iV v/“/1f^cccaf I ifirntM cu rrx w‘ V ewea i v I •fiJ Phone ^home) 3’74~ /rt7/f /CW) •/ t • X yjf /V Address 4^2^ LcsK->. Phone (work ) ^ 7.^ - 7^95_____ City L.V..S f?i.CZip S^^/L OWNER (if different than applicant) Name i-lo _____ Phone (home) Phone Address 4-1 .Vo K^c.-VK 1^«yyn V).' City j*)rc.>o Zip 3t» ^ Date Property Acquired ^P C_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. mm mm mm ' m mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm ^m mm ^m mm mm mm ^m mm mm mm mm ^m mm ^m mm ^m mm mm mm ^m ^m mm mm mm mm ^m mm mm mm mm mm ^m mm ^m ^m PLES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee X $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application V $125.00 Residential accessory Use $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration ____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain _ _ Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more _ _ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $175-00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $250.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT DSE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: /n-f (mr^ r<^(ir'T t V1(^ rv t Tt> c\<r c\\o lr\ (\>aA -Vq cvtc rv\c, AnV t-. a'V^rnc-(~g. \A \ ch i\^ <'C/UrNr(. clrr mf*r> 4- REQUIRBD SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan^ if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17• OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all inform^tion required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Icnowledge. Applicant's signature (SX Date 7— tIc - ^ ^ OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. r Owner's signature Date 7- *7^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. RUN DATE 06/20/90 BATCH 009 PROP AOOR OHICR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP AOOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP AOOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP AOOR (MCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PRrpERTY OMNERS LIST SB 06-117>2S 2S 0001 000S8 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED JEANNE T ARMSTRONG JEAN T ARMSTRONG 235 NORTH ARM LANE HOUND HN 55S64 SB 06-117-2S 2S 0005 09690 NORTH ARM OR H DAL IVERSON DANIEL A LINDA IVERSON 9690 NORTH ARM OR HJUNO 55S69 SB 06-117-23 2S OOOB OOOSB ADDRESS UNASSI6NE0 AOMIN OF VETERANS AFFAIRS NORMAN F A LINDA OESTREICH 9760 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 55369 SB 06-117-2S 2S OOIS 09730 NORTH ARM OR H R A K HOFFMAN R JAMES A KAREN F HOFFMAN 9730 N ARM OR H MOUm HN 55369 PROP AOOR OMIER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR TOTAL BATCH 009 0C012 38 06-117-23 23 0002 09620 NORTH ARM OR H D A A M H HINTER DON A HINTER 9620 NO ARM DR HEST MOUT^D rvi 55369 38 06-117-23 23 0006 09600 NORTH ARM OR H TINOIIIY R GRAMENTZ TIMOIHY R GRAMENTZ 9600 NORTH ARM OR H MOUND Ttl 55369 38 06-117-23 23 0009 09790 NORTH ARM OR H J A J HEODERG JOHN A a JANiCE HEOBERO 9790 NORTH ARM DR H HOUND MN 55369 38 06-117-23 23 0019 09720 flORTH ARM DR H JOAtST M GRIMES JOATti M GRIMES 9720 NORTH ARM DR H MOUND I«1 55369 REPORT NO. PI93S901 PAGE 21 38 06-117-23 23 0009 00330 NORTH SHORE OR H DARRELL G LATTA ETAL DARRELL G LATTA 330 NORTH SHORE DR H mound TW 55369 36 06-117-23 23 0007 09700 NORTH ARM OR H RAO HAIJALA RAYMOND 6 A DOROTHY MAIJALA 9700 NORTH ARM OR MOUND HN 55369 38 06-117-23 23 0010 09760 NORTH ARM OR N ADMIN OF VETERANS AFFAIRS NORMAN F A LINDA OESTREICH 9760 NORTH ARM DR MOUND rtl 55369 38 06-117-23 23 0015 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED JOANN M GRIMES JOATM M GRIMES 9720 NORTH ARM DR H MOUND MN 55369 lb64 (" ::pFls 7f COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. SUnVEYINC. EN3INEERINO AND LAND PLANNING 4B2-A TAMARACK AVENUE LONG LAKE. MINN. 59350 473-4 14 1 EASEMENT DESCRIPTIONS FOR JOANNE GRIMES IN LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 1, MCHANEY ADDITION AUGUST 2, 1990 EASEMENTS TO RR VACATKH The 5.00 foot wide utility and drainage easements on each side of the lot line between Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, McHaney Addition as dedicated on the recorded plat thereof; said easements to be vacated do not include any portion of the 10.00 foot wide utility and drainage easements surrounding the perimeter of said plat. EASEMENTS TO BK CRKATRn A 10.00 foot easement for utility and drainage purposes over those parts of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, McHaney Addi tion which lie within 5.00 feet on each side of the fol lowing described line: Beginning at the Southeast corner of :-,a:d Lot 1; thence on a.n assumed bearing of North 21 degrees 57 minutes 44 seconds West along the easterly line of said Lot 1 a distance of 115.00 feet; thence North 0 degrees 42 minutes East to the North line of said Lot 1, and said line there ending. To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson 5^/ From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:August 15, 1990 Subject: Chuck Downey, 2665 Casco Point Road - A) #1493 Variances - Referred back to Planning Commission by Council for Further Review B) #1570 Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing Status of Application #1493 - At the March 19, 1990 meeting of the Planning Commission, members approved an entry addition at 6'xl9' to the street side of the existing residence requiring approval of excessive hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. The property was found to have approximately 4,516 s.f. or 54%. The Planning Commission based their approval on the removal of some 787 s.f. of hardcover, reducing hardcover to 45%. This approval was conditioned on applicant removing approximately 9% of hardcover, bringing the total hardcover within the 75-250' setback area to the original approved hardcover level in an earlier 1982 review. At the Council meeting, the applicant advised Council of his concern with the request to remove the additional hardcover in the granting of the approval of the hardcover variance for the entry addition noting the entry addition would result in only 30 s.f. of additional hardcover because existing paved areas already exist under the portions of the proposed entry. The applicant also advised of plans to do alterations within his lakeshore yard to decrease the erosion that was taking place from excessive runoff received from the lot to the immediate south. Council members also questioned the legality of the second story lake- shore deck constructed some time in 1982 without the obvious benefit of the building permit review. Council advised the applicant that they would table all action on this application and advised the applicant to file a conditional use permit application for the proposed land alterations within the lake- shore yard, and asked for an updated survey recording all existing and proposed hardcover on the property. A conditional use permit has been filed by the applicant and an updated survey submitted for the current review and the second review of application #1493. Zoning Files #1493 & #1570 August 15, 1990 Page 2 of 5 A) 1. #1493 Variances - Proposed 6 After-the-fact - Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 - Average lakeshore setback - after-the-fact (review Exhibit H). Note the second story deck has been placed completely in front of the average lakeshore setback line. Planning Commission will be expected to make a recommendation to the Council concerning the status of the after-the-fact phase of the application. 2. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - 0-75' Setback Area = 4,500 s.f. Existing Hardcover = 550 s.f. or 12% per 1982 survey Existing Hardcover = 718.7 s.f. or 15.97% per 1990 survey (refer to Exhibits H & N) Proposed Hardcover = 682.4 s.f. or 15.16% (refer to Exhibit 0) Removal of 105.3 s.f. (smaller deck + cement slabs) and 69 s.f. of addn hardcover with retaining walls 75-250' Setback Area = 8,325 s.f. Existing Hardcover = 3,760 s.f. or 45% per 1982 iii?ifvey Existing Hardcover = 4,990.1 s.f. or 59.94% per 1990 survey (refer to Exhibits H & P) Proposed Hardcover = 3,992.3 s.f. 48% (refer to Exhibit Q) Removal of 1,041.8 s.f. & additions of 43 s.f. (retaining walls + entry addition) List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F • Exhibit G ■ Exhibit H ■ Exhibit I ■ Exhibit J • Exhibit K Exhibit L Exhibit M Exhibit N Exhibit 0 Exhibit P Exhibit Q Application Plat Map Property Owners List Cross Section - Retaining Walls Elevation of Lakeshore Improvements - Holzer Plan - Smerling Plan - Updated 1990 Survey & Topographic Mapping - 1982 Survey - Planning Commission Minutes 3/19/90 - Council Minutes 4/9/90 - Floor Plan - Entry Addition - Street Elevations - Hardcover Fact Sheet 0-75' - Hardcover Fact Sheet Proposed 0-75' - Hardcover Fact Sheet Existing 75-250' - Hardcover Fact Sheet Proposed 75-250' i zoning Files #1493 & #1570 August 15, 1990 Page 3 of 5 Review of Application #1493 - The updated survey shows total hardcover at 59.4 s.f. In the original review, staff found hardcover at 4,516 s.f. or 54%. The revised survey does not designate the existing hardcover area scheduled for removal. Please review Exhibit H, staff has designated the areas of landscaping underlain with plastic and the portion of gravel drive scheduled for removal. Applicant should designate the limits of the area to be removed within the off-street parking area. Staff failed to note in the original review that in 1982 surveyors did not include landscape areas with underlying plastic. Landscape area with plastic to the street side of the house appears to be 8+ years in age. Staff does reaffirm applicant's claim that in the original 1982 approval, the extended gravel parking area to the south was approved by Council as it was deemed suitable for backing out purposes. At the recent Council meeting, Glenn Cook confirmed that this area could not serve for backing out purposes, that only portions of the street right-of-way could serve for backout purposes with the limited 20' depth. Planning Commission should review the minutes of March 19, 1990, Exhibit J, to determine if the new information submitted for a second review will alter the original approval motion of the Commission. If members reaffirm the original approval, staff would ask that prior to scheduling the application before the Council, that applicant submit a survey designating all areas of hardcover to be removed. Planning Commission must also provide direction regarding the issue of the second story lakeshore deck. B) #1570 Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Required for proposed land alterations within the lakeshore yard in excess of the allowed 100 cubic yards, the installation of three tiered retaining wall at 4%’ in height and involving land alterations and additional hardcover within the 0-75' setback area. - 1. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Additional hardcover reviewed in the above section. Retaining walls within 0-75' setback area (refer to Exhibits H & O) 69 s.f. 2, Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 - Conditional use permit required for land alterations in excess of 100 cubic yards and the installation of three tiered retaining walls at a 4>j' height requires a conditional use permit. Zoning Files #1493 S #1570 August 15/ 1990 Page 4 of 5 3. Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - No land alterations or structures allowed within the 0~75' setback area requiring variance approval. Required = 75' Proposed = 30' (closjst section of retaining wall) It should be noted that the majority of the retaining wall tiers are located within the lakeshore protected area. Review of Application - The applicant claims that his property sustains ma;]or erosion because of the land alterations approved by the City for the property located to the immediate south. The imfamous Holzer application commenced prior to the hiring of the current zoning staff, but the legal battles pursued through to 19^80-81, resulting in appeals to the Supreme Court. The Holzer "after- the-fact" application involved the installation of retaining walls and major filling in the upper elevations of the property in preparation for a proposed lakeside pool. The work was conducted without the benefit of a building permit or the required conditional use permit review. At that time, accessory structures were not subject to average lakeshore setbacks. The application was denied. Please review Exhibit F, the plan presented by the applicant during the land use review. Exhibit G is an alternate plan presented by the neighbor to the immediate south of the Holzer property as another alternative (referred to hereafter as "Smerling Plan"). The Smerling Plan showed a swale leading from the north lot line to the center of the property draining to the lake. The applicant contends that a swale was to be installed within the Holder property to prevent runoff from reaching his property line. The files do not reveal what final plans were approved for the Holzer property. The retaining walls were removed and ground cover restored. The elevations remain as they were after original fil. ing the land alterations. If the Smerling Plan was to be the fii 2I plan approved by the City, such plan would have been marked as "final approved plan". It is doubtful whether a plan prepared by Smerling's engineer would have been the one accepted by the City. In any event, the City Engineer and staff reviewed ♦■he site noting signs of minimal erosion of the steep lakeshore yard. The yard in its present condition is very difficult to maintain. The tiering of the yard will provide gentler slopes for ease of maintenance. The applicant has not submitted information as to how much fill is to be brought in but he will provide the information to the City at our meeting. The Engineer with his original review of the plan had assigned the cutting of the bank would provide the additional fill as fill is only proposed in the upper southeast corner adjacent to the patio area and in the lower tiered area. The area immediately adjacent to the boat house show exposed sharp cuts into the bank. This area remains unprotected. zoning Files #1493 & #1570 August 15, 1990 Page 5 of 5 In consideration of previous requests by residents to alter lakeshore banks, specifically within the Casco Point area, the hardships inust not only be defined by an applicant, but they must be of a magnitude that would require the filling and the installation of three tiers of retaining walls within the lake- shore protected area (0—75')» Based on the elevations of the yard to the immediate south, this property appears to have always received drainage and runoff. In fact, staff would suggest that the flatter yard area created with the Holzer land alterations may have provided more suitable abs^^rption area for the runoff. The City Engineer's review comments will not be included with this packet, but will be delivered with the Friday packet. He too advises that in consideration of previous actions of the Council, that the only portion of the land alteration that appears viable, would be to allow retaining walls constructed where severe cuts remain without support adjacent to the area of the boat house and possibly a slight extension of the bank. Options of Action - A) Approval of plan as submitted; B) Approval of an amended proposal; or C) Denial. -3 /,'C' CITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE PROPERTY LOCATION ' ^ =Si g \ Site Address - - - - - - - /h i Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) r-TTV nr nii-nun UJl t I VI Vfl^VttV_ rvy,M;rr nccjrc r Xlthitu 4- VI I lUi-i 7^y\r>nnr>M XVWiUWVW un S£V Please attach legal description to application if not includS^ on required survey. Phone (home) /-~7 c/ Cu’X.' • VV ECUPr-W^iK rW VJ, \AJ' Vu coo'r^i'jwn v?37ri'/w />UUj5A.f HI V‘rrj. APPLICANT Name C!.^v-vxfc^ _ _ _ _ _ _^Phone (work) Address QjU ^ <lv^’^C^) P^- City Zip_S[]£^ll OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)- - - - - - - - - Name Address Phone City Zip Date Property-Acquired t '■ ~f i imontr I (do) (gcTno^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. ^ *vi^cpC / ^ ^(month/year) PEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS “ Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other —^specarfy' DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail:SV^P 2. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11* X 17” OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not co’^ered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the bes^_of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date Cp~ ^ ^ OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ..iCV.X.''. »l- r 1 •V '17^a 07) . (19) f(30) % (21) 4 V ^AHS]).0; (23) 4 (24) ^ %^ % ,tP. ^k" 'A ., / I CXU 16624 (35^^ 1i ■|3^ ^^^30) J ^___ i2); 7/Q> -6i) a 05 M ^ (I) • -•- • r •*?t (0 ^ (6) 19) ( 18) 02 I'/'fZ '»'^^/'< • ar ^ 06) ^./, ^/t^(4») ih i » 1^ h A '9^i.'A '>-4/ Vv i-'v, (i6)'^l ‘)c RUN DATE 07/12/90 BATCH 005 PROP ADOR ONt«R NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 20-117-23 23 0001 02683 CASCO POINT RD BEVERLY SHERLING BEVERLY SHERLING 2552 N LAKE OF ISLES PKHY MPLS MN 55405 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0»«4ERS LIST 38 20-117-23 23 0002 02691 CASCO POINT RD ROBERT K HUNT ETAL ROBERT K MUf4T 2691 CASCO PT RD HAY2ATA m 55391 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 14 38 20-117-23 23 0003 02695 CASCO POINT RD 0 I P LEE D E F A P R LEE 2695 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA m 55391 PROP ADOR QNNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 38 20-117-23 23 0004 02697 CASCO POINT RD A A C KANE A LAHRENCE KANE 2697 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0005 02715 CASCO POINT RD TAD ERHIN TERRY A A DOROTHY L ERHIN 2715 CASCO P0ir4T RD HAYZATA m 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0020 02677 CASCO POINT RD TYRONE A BUCEY A MILA BUCEY TYR0T4E A A MILA BUCEY 2677 CASCO PT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER rUME/ADDR PROP ADOR 0HT4ER NAME TAXPAYER NA»^/AODR 38 20-117-23 23 0021 02665 CASCO POINT RD BENNETT C DOFilEY A HIFE BENNETT C DOHNEY 2665 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0002 02660 CASCO POINT RD V A 6 DULLER VERNON J DULLER 2660 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0021 02710 CASCO POINT RD C H A B J PALMER CURTIS H A BARBARA J PALMER 2710 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0030 02645 CASCO POINT RD N J GREENE A A K GREENE NORMA GREENE A ALAN GREENE 2645 CASCO POINT ROAD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0022 02659 CASCO POINT RD S S STAr4DA A I S STAfiOA S S STAf^OA A I S STANOA 2659 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA Mt4 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0003 02684 CASCO POINT RD THEODORE C DAI4T1S DAVID RUT4KLE 2684 CASCO PT RO SO HAYZATA m 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0022 02700 CASCO POINT RO D P BUESIf4G A L R RUrt4ING DANIEL BUESING/LINOA RUTtUNG 2700 CASCO POINT RD MAYZA1A rtN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0031 02635 CASCO POINT RO MARILYN B THORNE ET AL MARILYN B THORNE 2635 CASCO P0I!4T RO HAYZATA rtN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0001 02684 CASCO POINT RD THEODORE C DANTIS DAVID RUNKLE 2684 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0004 02686 CASCO POINT RD THEODORE C DANTIS DAVID RUNKLE 2684 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA ^t4 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0029 02649 CASCO POINT RO J A J SCHERVEN JON SCHERVEN 2649 CASCO POINT RD BOX 120 NAVARRE 55392 38 20-117-23 24 0032 02623 CASCO POINT RO JAN STINSOfI JAMES L A NAOMI L STINSON 2623 CASCO P0If4T RO HAYZATA 194 55391 RUN DATE 07/12/90 BATCH 005 PROP ADDR (»tlER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 58 20-117-23 29 0035 02617 CASCO POINT RD 6 L NARQUARDT/J H HARQUAROT GARY L I JOAN M HARQUAROT 2617 CASCO POINT RD NAYZATA HN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OMT4ERS LIST 38 20-117-23 29 0039 02698 CASCO POINT RD J N a 8 J ESSEN JEFFREY S BARBARA ESSEN 2698 CASCO PT PD HAYZATA m L^591 REPORT NO. PI935901 PAGE 15 38 20-117-23 29 0096 02691 ETHEL AVE DOROTHY L KEARNS DOROTHY L KEARNS 2691 ETHEL AVE NAYZATA m 55391 PROP ADDR OltlER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR TOTAL BATCH 005 00021 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENIATIOtl OF INFORIUTION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COlt4TY DEPARTMEr4T OF PROPERTY TAXATIOT4, TO THE BEST OF I1Y Kr40HLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE C. ooco>iL/eY HARDCOVER CALCULATION HORKSH ^T SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' (p~25^ 250-500' :?G0-i000' Existing Hardcover in Zone * • A. ■ House 3€» /= s.f. LENGTH 6? WIDTH IH . X Jji^ luS X X X 3. G arage 2<. 2 X 2 y. 2. /S^ACk rc!^ c. D riveway X . D.. Sidewalk _/? /Ot X J.5 ?. 5- 2. f /cck O/^ti E. Patio / " / ? ____ X <r / y <7 C**rrf^ Total Hardcover in Zone fWiO h3> Total Property Area in Zone ^3Z 5-/ 4 %3)>S •3 0 ------------------------- / ^ S.F. S.F. 0 S.F. g’JI’c s.r. ^3^-'' ____ S.F, 6'i S • F • S.F. 3 6 U' p S.F. Deck ^Ar/t>.X S /)f=CK p. Landscape • • 2?X A /ss AREAS UNDERLAJN X . plastic sheeting X • ? 6 V c', r X = C////HA. fr ?. 9 V /. 7 G. Other y V X /. -c j’/5 S.F J25- y s.F.\ 't« ZC 5 2 O O____ S.F. l2. ^ V3 S.F. S.F. <r. ^ S.F. 9 99J./ S.F. f3 25 S.F. X IQO S9. ?y__% C. ooct/4\^ey HARDCOVER CALCULATION KORKSH^T SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 2r0~o00 500-1000 E xisting Hardcover in Zone P A. House f'^.3 / V5* V. P s.F. LENGTH WIDTH 01570 • •• X X • S.F. • X S.F. (lARAGR Z<. z X 2V. 2.(^JV. 0 S.F. C. /SiA(kr<P D r IVrWAY X ??s S.F. • X • • S.F. • D • ! • • Sidewalk ‘/?X 3.5 •^3 S.F. w 1 . /Of 3. S 3 T3. 5 X 2.F /06. y S.F. V <r 3^ /fiCM VU4U. —>:i 6 X / _ _=S.F. E.^ATio/HO X /• •Ho )eck /^Ar/i>X .r=3f5 S.F. ^(=CK . ••72? P 1 AMn^^CAP*^<?«p ;<A f =9^-. 9 S.F. AREAS ZC 5 UNDERLAIN AV X s 2 0 0 S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X s S.F. U./U.5 V C7 . S -V3 X _—S.F. c////hA> (r ?. 9 V /. 7 €. € G. 1D tHFR C<:t,c.7 V X / c ^ .6 _S.F. • Total Hardcover IN Zone 9 990. /S.F. Total Property Area in Zone 73-2 5 S.F. yjzs-X 100 S9. ?Y % « *C. HARDCOVER CALCUU\TIOfl WORKSHEET 'o S£T3AC:< ZOHS: (CIRCLE one) 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone I' r i, HniiRF Z 2 ^ Z X /2.3 2 7J. /S.F. LENGTH WIDTH • X =#S.F. X • S.F. ••X S.F. • X • S.F. R. (lARARR X • c ••0 • r . • • r, ripf VPWAY X ._S.F. Y S..= . • n. RfncwAt v: ' ZV X 2-^ _■ /,?.S.F. 17 \ V s. 5* X 9 y. 5 S.F. X S.F. ♦ E. !^T+e//<-Vfc’ / 7.' Za.i y 5-. 3 X ^>3 _____ • /^9^3 S.F. TLA6S- P.l iLnSTAPr 2 y /.S'X/.S mmm . S.F.\ AR^ T^dAOAoe X 2 mmrn 2. 2.\ s.f/' \^c/ »LAsVlC ^SHEETING X » S.F. • X S.F. CA*y<. Ct4rr^A / 9 fi. Othpr X a 2 2.5 S.F. Total Hardcover V IN Zone 7/S’. 7 . S.F.A Total P roperty Area in Zone ^■fSCfO S.F. 7//-7 4 o USX X 100 " ^ ( s'. W . • • •C. HARDCOVER CALCULATIOfl WORKSHEET 9 cf s=r3Ac:< Zotic: (CIRCLE OM6)<0^ 75-250' 2S0-300' 500-1000' E xisting Hardcover in Zone 3 oat A. House Z2.2.X /2.3 LENGTH -4 X X 3. Garage X c. Driveway X D.. S idewalk Z 9 1 7 X 2^0 S. S X E. /7. / lo.*/ X y X. 3 3 <rvA^r. TC46S- F. lA^npcAPg 2 X /.7>ii.5 T(AACt>0f> UNOERUVIN3/V . A Co^f Vx ^ B^sVlC ‘SHEETING C^t^f.Carr^A /9 g. Other _______ X /. 5- X Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone 273, / s.F. / 9H,S V-5- 2. 2. Z2.S *-/SOO S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. y^.o s.F. S • F. S • r • ■=■ • JjD. € - /^9, 3 s.F. s.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 7/^.7 S.F. S.F.3 7/^.7 X 100 /5.77 % 'H ) ' i. . • % » I ‘ • . • • V . -'V •••A: • • •••:, •. ^■••••' -r , . V- V: '; : . ' ■* ■■ ' , * V . • • i , •. •r t « y • .1- :. I ' • .• ’; : t. .,•■ ■ • :V>'• >. 1 ‘ . • *vv . ♦ • t i' *- . ’ ' vt *••'• • -W.- . *•■ I ■ •'-'/t ■ . ■ •;, . • •v/-^ *•■’ ■ • v ^ *•• • ' '■ ’• ;* ’ I'F*.- . * '.•■ :• • • I • ' *r • t 1 '■a ■N A"t> g LEVAT16M ^CALE.'/4'v r.o' / • -• * • • ^ » • • », '$ • . y • « % • • •;*/ . j . . . • ■ • * •' ■.‘'a- . • •• •* ? . • • MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 9, 1990 ZONING FILE #1493-DOWNEY CONTINUED couucJLer. jrfr.o commission would approve of the recommendation. Bernhardson st^ed that staff would review the second story deck issue and that the fee for the revised application would be calculated as though Mr. Downey had originally submitted a comprehensive application. Motion, Ayes-5, Nays-0, Motion passed. #1494 FRANCIS S. LIGHTLY 3585 FREDERICK STREET Mr. and Mrs. Lightly were present for this matter. Bernhardson briefly explained the applicants' original and revised proposal to construct an addition, a pool and oatio. Mr. Lightly explained the two lines that have been drawn to depict the average lakeshore setback. Mayor Grabek asked if the neighbors .(B^aaten and McLeoa, 3565 Frederick Street) were still objecting to tne Lightlys proposal. SO that the structure is setback an additional IJ i.e.-t. Mayor Graoek asked if the neighbors were aware of the revised plan. Mr. Lightly stated that the neighbors have not seen the revised plan. Mabusth noted that only the pool and patio would encroach into the average lakeshore setback area. Goetten stated that the purpose of the average lakeshore -'sa^r^hlr^a not obstruct any views of the lake. Motion Ayes-5, Nays-0, Motion passed. - 6 - MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 9, 1990 ZONING FILE #14V3-D0WNEY CONTINUED contractor had obtained all of the necessary permits to construct the garage and the deck. Mabusth asked City Engineer Cook if the gravel area on the property would provide a sufficient turn around. Cook indicat that the turn around would almost have to be on Casco Point Roaa to be effective. Mabusth noted that the addition of the entry would only increase hardcover 30 s.f. because it is placed over existing sidewalk and a step area. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten to approve the hardcover variance in accordance with Planning Commission recommendation to maintain hardcover at 45%. AlsOf the boathouse is a non-conforming building and is subject to all pertinent ordinances. There was no second. Councilmember Nettles asked staff if they were satisfied with the present status of the second story deck, or would they prefer to explore that further. Mabusth replied that staff would proceed in accordance with Council direction. She commented that it is always difficult for staff to accurately evaluate an application without an updated survey. Mabusth suggested amending the Resolution to advise the applicant that an updated survey will be required for any future improvements to this property. Mr. Downey stated that he would be coming back to the City in one month to apply for a permit for retaining walls. Mr. Downey said that due to the improvements to the neighboring property, he now has serious erosion problems. Mabusth asked Mr. Downey if he would be willing to combine the retaining wall application with this variance application. Mr. Downey stated that originally he had intended to do that. In order that he might proceed as quickly as possible with the entryway project, staff advised him to submit separate applications. Mabusth suggested that this application be tabled and allow the applicant to submit a fully amended application including a conditional use permit for land alterations. She asked Mr. Downey to submit a fully updated survey with that application. Callahan noted that in light of adding the conditional use permit, the application would have to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. - 5 - • / / I minutes of orono council meeting held APRIL 9, 1990 1^ #1493 CHUCK DOWNEY 2665 CASCO POINT ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION --eont- for the review of his varianceMr. Downey was present for tne application Bernhardson provided a y well as information regarding wnat is currently pro. Mr. Downey '°r®"'^®‘'^enfation°“®ft wls ‘'no\ sSing° th« Planning ® ..I. ve been told I'm some kind of a bad he wished to do. He said, I ^^mysteriously increased to guy because hardcover on se wis put L at the same 52%. The sidewalk leaaing to u Building Inspector was t‘me the garage was constructed, ^he City^Bui^^^^^g^ there and saw what I was submit a new survey that showed what my harocove- . instructed by with this application. I I had to widen the the City that j^l^^^irectlv into'the road. There was driveway so I w°bl= “"ih side which had beeh blacktop at one part gravel, on the south si , asked me ?ime. The City is now r!-v was aware of everything I to install. To my knowledge . would have increased did in 1982. The only \ morrdrivewav area. It Mabusth stated that staff '^Vtaf7''h7s he orovide an updatea survey. ^ nnted that the^-e is a second s-ory''dt/k" tdrtfas^con^lructer^ithout a permit'and does not appeL on the survey submitted with the appl*cation. vn Downev stated that if there was a 4% or 5%^difference in the amount of existing hardcover, it should not ma-w.r. • ^-Ha*- 4% or 5% would make a significantMaousth indicatec uhaw. **« or difference. Councilmember Goetten indicated that ®“ooetten asker m7. Doiney" irh%“'hld cohstruct'ed the second story deck with no permit. Mabusth stated that Mr. Downey ^“^'^for ^ the”%Iraaef MabuLh'**?nform^d'"the" council "that she had reviewed that appucation and it applied only to the garage. Mr. Downey added that it was his understanding that his - 4 - minutes of march 19, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ZONING FILE 91493-DOWNEY CONTINUED "^peri^to in t.e 75-250 ■ se.bacR area. Mr. Downey indicated that he had measured hie garden betore coming to this meeting and found it to e Kellev clarified that Mr. Downey is proposing to remove 142 s.f. of hardcover from what is shown as Area A on Exhibit L of Staff's memo. Brown noted that Mr. Downey would also remove hardcover from the driveway. Mabusth stated that is what Mr. Downey is proposing. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. Hanson said, ^cove^^ "«ma!r al^ amendment to what we received ear-ier. agreed with that estimate. Mr Downev indicated that he did not have time to do any more me^urTng "and that he would accept staffs estimate. It was moved bv Planning Commissioner Hanson, to recommend approval .Of ^be ^vised proposal for t.he determining Motion Ayes-3, Johnson Nay. Motion, p ,, ^Sn-str:ctu°/al ""hard^orr "is being traded for structural hardcover. #1494 FRANCIS LIGHTLY 3585 FRED^uRICK STREET rpferred back to planning commissionreferred bacr ^_^^ matter. Light^y^r" Mfb”s“h“atxed‘’L. -^"xpl^^iriThe^s^ iongei" planning to remove hardcover from the west side of the driveway. Mr. Lightly said, '•Originally we were removing 200-250 s.f. - 7 - i MINUTES OF MARCH 19, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING GABRIEL JABBOUR CONTINUED ^Chairman Kellev allowed Mr. Jabbour the opportunxty to speak? but asked him' to hold his comments within a 5-minute time period. Mr. Jabbour said, "As you probably know, I appeared two wo#»!ce! aao before the City Council expressing concern and critcism aboSi the Planning commission. I am concerned about the way in Which Orono has been treating the lakeshore and Laxe Minnetcyi. a. In 1975 Orono adopted our present Ordinance ^ exceptionally cood first attempt to address all of the concerns Orono' has to address. Orono always set the pace for other municipalities to follow. Lately, I find there is a of confusion regarding what our Ordinance intendea to do and the way in which it is being interpreted. I am concerned about the way in which non-conforming structur.s within 0-75' of the lake are being addressed. dLlt with those in the past with a non-conforming I have been advised bv City Staff chat you can no longer deal with non-conformino structures in chat way because they are not a use thev are a structure. In 1975 our Code said specifically that any’ structure which did not have an appraised market value oSer t"!500 would be torn down. The City did not hake_it upon themselves to ao door-to-door to assure that those Sv--uc u _ were torn down,' but felt that as time wenu by they wou-c address this issue. I had one of those structures on my property ana I took out a permit from City Hall and tore it down. Lately we have a lot of residents for additions to their primary structures within / ^ The City has allowed the trading of hardcover to al^ow thes. additions to be constructed. The hardcover addition may wash out compared to the removals, but the indent of the Ordinance was that the non-conrorming structures would be eliminated. I feel it is the duty of the Planning Commission to amend the ordinance if a loop-hole is found to J- that the Planning Commission would change its £ reactive to proactive. Orono was always ten steps ahead. I feel the Planning Commission is sending a message to residents. 5Su want to^uild within 0-75* of the lake, go now and put in a rock garden with plastic underlining. Then come back to the Ci.-y and trade your plastic underlining in_for a new living room. I would like to see that message changed. #1493 CHOCK DOWNEY 2665 CASCO POINT ROAD VARIANCE CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:40 P.M. TO 7:45 P.M. Mr Downey was present for the continuation of this public hearing! Zon?n, Administrator Habusth reviewed the information regarding this application. Mabusth presented new intormation - D - % w Cortl fi(tatc of Survey for n. f-luirlui Doi.noy (»r l/3\ 1%, S;>rlnf^ P.>rk rt)\inty, M5iiiiusota I 5 5 n IS i. io»»c 53t»o t a*«-a |^(*OI |t.iil^f 4l7i» li4r*L (:fi ' .I'l *M' • ‘ li i • I I f* J H(>- fl >>| ('(r'fnie'J r},iiii<|< .'kl.lifioii hafJtutf 1 hereby cortll'y thiil thla ju n 1 ruu end correct ropreiientaii<^iu or u Min/oy ol' U.u lvmi.i!»rii*b of Lot 136, Spjrlnjr Puik, tV,o locution ol nil i.ulllln)ti ll.j|*.-»i.;, ;.r.h the proposed location of a piorosed builclin. Scale: Date t o • j 1” - 30' 9-7-B? Iron .Torkur tc* 0 VJ vj (I'l l.-it l(. (loffin 60^)4 i^iii I !,urv j/or unci FUrmer Uifu* I,.k3, Ulnnosota CO C4-^' ra-m TtTTJJA^f MM.naIltT'. ':«i« 1 ifi Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & ly I Associates Engineers & Architects Cno G Borfsjroa PE ftooefi Roscnc. PE joseon C Arxaenx PE V^rvn L SorvaU. PE ?<^afT3 E Tu/r»ef. PE Janes C Oson PE G^ersn R C c»*l PE Thomas £ fsioyes. PE Pocerr G Schun<nt PE Sosan M Et:e't.n C PA Ketth A Gonaon PE Pchard W Foster. PE OoraK) C Sur^anSL PE Jerry A Boordon, PE Mark A Hanson. PE Ted ic F-eW PE sKhae^ T Rautmann PE RoOeft R Pfefflehe. PE Oasnd O LosKoca. PE Thomas W Pererson. PE V<nae^ C Lyncn. PE James R .Vaiarva PE iCenneth P Ancerson PE Mirk R Rolfs. PE Pcce'T C Russek. A ! A Thomas E Angul PE Howard A Sanford PE Danei J Edgecon PE Vark A Sea ?E Pn^to J Caswea PE ismaei Marrrsez. PE Mark D PE / Thomas R Andersoa AJi^ Gary F Rytanoer. PE M«es 8 Jensen. PE L Phr!i:p G'av^ fJi, PE Rene C Ptumart A i A A^rses M Ring, A iC P jeny O Pprtzscn. PE Cfc o 0 ivief Pc Cranes A Enckson Leo M Pawefsky Hanan M Oson August 15, 1990 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Attn; Jeanne Mabusth Re: Chuck Downey Property Our File No. 139-15/J Dear Jeanne: tfe have reviewed the retaining wall construction proposed on the Chuck Downey property on Casco Point Road. The retaining wall plan appears to be in excess of what is necessary for bank stabilization. would be difficult to erosion evident on the The bank from the house to the lake is very steep and maintain. there is not a significant amount oL property even though we have had a very wet summer. There does appear to be a need for a retaining wall on the east side of the boathouse. This wall could be extended along the walkway area about 25 feet to allow proper grading. We would not reconu-.-nd that the other walls be constructed as there does not appear to be a need for bank stabilization. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly. BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, IN r*w • Glenn R. Cook GRC:dh grc/89 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul. Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 • • • CITY OF ORONO ZONING PILE #1554 ciysiarSay! MH 55323 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 473-7357 Date of Notxce; 07/17/90 TO: Timothy R. Gramentz COPIES TO; 4680 North Arm Drive Moundy MN 55364 _ _ _ ___ _ __ ■ •• «« w •• ** ** TYPE OP APPLICATION; Variance _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE OP MEETING; July 16, 1990 VOTE; 5 For 0 Against Planning ConoBission recommends the following; Tabled for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS; Planning Commission tables the request because neither applicant nor a ^ representative was present to answer questions. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as Planning Commission ; on Monday, August 20, 1990; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minuted they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. Applicant is advised that you or your representative sho^uld at the August 20 meeting. If you cannot attend, please advise City sta (473-7357). Isv To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: July 7, 1990 #1554 Timothy R. Gramentz, 4680 North Arm Drive Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-IB, Single family rural residential, 2 acre, unsewered Application - Request for side setback variance to construct second story over existing garage. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Letter of Request & Hardship/Description of Unusual Property Conditions Neighboring Property Acknowledgements Survey House Plans Pertinent Facts - 1. Required side setback = 30* Proposed side setback = 19.3* 2. Applicant's residence was destroyed by fire in February. Applicant is requesting to rebuild on the same foundation, with the same footprint, and generally replacing the house in kind. The need for the variance stems from the fact that the one significant revision from the pre-existing house, will be the second story over the garage area, which was not consumed by the fire. Discussion - The applicant's architect apparently had no contact with the City until the plans were completed, and applicant was not aware of the need for a variance until he applied for a permit. The existing attached garage is 19.3' from the side lot line. The nearest adjacent residence structure to the east is 200' distant. Constructing above the garage will have no impact in increasing visual density of the neighborhood and will probably not be a noticable change to the property. AS ,r pt- r Zoning File #1554 July 1, 1990 Page 2 of 2 The existing lot is 0.89 acres in area» and 140' in width. The property is served by a septic system which was upgraded approximately 3 years ago. Staff has had in-house discussions regarding whether or not a lot area and width variance is technically needed in this situation. The applicant's insurance company would not pay for a new foundation, finding that the existing foundation was substantially intact and reuseable. If the foundation without the upper floors constitutes an existing structure, then it would not seem technically necessary to grant the lot area and width variances. The zoning code does not specify for conforming uses, the decree of destruction of a structure which changes its legally existing status. Such provisions are only defined for non-conforming uses (i.e. commercial uses in residential zone, for instance). Staff Recommendation - Given no apparent detrimental impact to the neighborhood, and finding that the property has contained a single family residence for many years, staff would recommend approval of the side setback variance to allow construction above the existing garage. U:CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION i' ^ Initial Application Fee $175.00 ^ ^ ^ ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) mm mm mm mm mm ^m mm mm mm mm mm mmmm^m ^m mm mm mm mm mm m mm ^m mm mm mam mm mm mm mm ^m ^m mi mi PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 4680 NORTH ARM DRIVE ______________ !#/• • } i\ N Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 06-1 17-23??3-0006 CTM^vrc f'cnrc. .... C l # aci. „i x*- n .‘fu zA i.*ki^v'c V w\/v n 01 CDI 175.00a^K n. 175.00ruy.ik' \r,i I wx'uC'f'i i f)ni uni < • **7* ?TXi.'vcuv uw^va nvi. .iJL«x* $tL /11 / i-*t I VU/ V • / /V Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name TIMOTHY R. GRAMENTZ Phone (home) 472-5576 Phone (wor)c) 472-5578 Address; 4680 NORTH ARM DRIVE OWNER (if different than applicant) Name SEE ABOVE City; MOUND^ORONO Phone (home) Zio: 55364 Phone (wor)c) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I C(d#)} M<3o not) ^Iso own the adjacent parcels of land. (month/year) PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CITY TO COMPLETE Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP RBQOBST Estimated Construction Cost $121,000.00 Df>9cribe reauest in details REBUILD HOME ON EXISTING BLOCK STRUCTURE WITHOUT •10DIFICATI0N, CITY HAS DETERMINED IT DOES NUl MEET CURRENT SET-BACK REQUIREMENTS. /ARIANCBS REQUIRED _ _ _ Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front _ _ _ Hardcover ****** side Rear) HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; SEE ATTACHMENT_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ DBSCRIPTION OP DNUSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements;______________________SEE ATTACHMENT_________________ ■ 2. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form . , , , ^ Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list).'^ Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. . Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR_ _ A WORKING COPY (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that ypn'r variance application is not c^mulete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete Initialed by Clerical Staff __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE rhe applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff lime not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses Incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and coirect tt^^a^best of J^is/her knowledge. applicant's Signature f Date TIMOTHY R. 6RAMENTZ INNERS SIGNATURE . r ..k 'he owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, igents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga- ion and verification of request. ‘ wner's Signature Date - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -“7" pplicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the lanning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the hird Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is nable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an uthorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building fi Zoning ffice of this change prior to the meeting. I t J RUN DATE 06/11/50 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0»^4ERS LIST BATCH 007 PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 38 06-117-23 23 0002 0^620 NORTH ARM OR H 0 A 6 H H HINTER DON A HINTER 4620 NO ARM DR NEST MOUND MN 55364 HnJ.' C / PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 38 06-117-23 23 0007 04700 NORTH ARM DR H RID MAIJALA RAYMOND 6 I DOROTHY MAIJALA 4700 NORTH ARM OR MOUND MN 55364 L/ 7 3,- S 11 ^ ® PROP ADDR OHT4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR TOTAL BATCH 007 00006 38 06-117-23 23 0005 04640 r40RTM ARM OR H DAL IVERSON DANIEL A LINDA IVERSON 4640 rX)RTH ARM OR MOU440 MT4 55364 i-i 7 -r 7 i ' i . 38 06-117-23 23 0015 00038 ADDRESS UrMSSIGNEO JOANN M GRIMES J0Aft4 M GRIMES 4720 NORTH ARM DR H MOUt40 MN 55364 \ ‘ j 7 -1 L>o \ .eft''' M 91. REPORT NO. PI435<^01 PAGE 17 •. .< 38 06-117-23 23 0006 06680 NORTH ARH DR H TIMOTHY R GRAMENT2 TIMOTHY R GRAMENTZ 6680 rWRTH ARM OR W HOUND m 55366 'y \ 38 06-117-23 32 00U2 00405 NORTH ARM DR LAKEVIEN GOLF OF MTKA INC LAKEVIEH GOLF OF MTKA INC 855 RED OAK LANE HOUND MN 55364 7 >' 7 i- 7 -I M. V.i I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AI40 TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATIOT4 AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF I HE HENJ4EPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MT Kf^OHLEDGE AMO BELIEF. DATE 4 •;I'"; ^ V. <r ;. * i /n .• • ; '*. i* * , -.* . m • ^ ^ • • *• •. ■ ! •■'.■ ''..svi’VA; •*. i * • • / • . (I) ‘J!9**a'02'E ryj.44 ^ -“”^7 !> 5 P AM (13)1 2 ( »4) »»». '8 »^».3 ( 10) 2^6.37 cuftot I U.J uj I (9) (3) f »5) 3J1U Sa3 ’58'02*f o 4C2.fl6 o a* « 0 ♦ •1.8 CW r.;vf i3:i.r> 427.86 0 <ri ♦ - -r. M33 C% • ■•••*« .. ijORT^-Mm ih^ »• • . ^ »• • • •- • .*•••’ .* •■/. * • • • • • . » •< ' • ^ • - * * •c..' [ \ * ^ * i*# .w*. ;? #1C54 r... I JLL Tt f £ t. £•' t I X 1 HARDSHIP & DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS: I 4680 NORTH ARM DRIVE ON JANUARY 21, 1990 MY HOME WAS DESTROYED BY FIRE. EVERYTHING WAS A TOTAL LOSS HOWEVER, THE BLOCK FOUNDATION WAS SALVAGABLE. DUE TO THIS MY INSURANCE COMPANY DID NOT REIMBURSE ME FOR THE REBUI' DING OF THE BASEMENT FOUNDATION. I AM REQUESTING THIS VARIANCE BECAUSE I WANT TO REBUILD MY HOME ON THE EXISTING BLOCK STRUCTURE THAT WILL ALLOW ME TO MINIMIZE ANY ADDITIONAL LOSSES, BY DESIGNING A HOME THAT FITS OVER THE EXISTING BLOCK STRUCTURE. UPON INQUIRING ABOUT THE BUILDING PERMIT THEY SAID THAT THE EXISTING STRUCTURE DID NOT MEET THE REQUIRED SET-BACKS NECESSARY BY APPROXIMENTLY 13 FEET. THEREFORE, I AM REQUESTING THIS VARIANCE DUE TO THE UNUSUAL PREDICAMENT THIS S PUT IN ME IN. I FEEL THIS WILL IN NO WAY BE A DETRIMENT TO THE EIGHBORHOOD OR COMMUNITY AND WILL ONLY ENHANCE THE VALUES OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS AND WILL ALSO ALLOW ME TO BEGIN PUTTING MY LIFE BACK TOGETHER AGAIN. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION IN THIS MATTER. NE / TIMOTHY R. GRAMENTZ • • • / d *m •/ ^ t V * __1 kJMOB I (we) Adjacent Property 7Sers'_,|i^owledg«ent Po T^A^nrv J-A1'-)1 i NMyrLPR. print address]-tptint name(sT have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at /I. AM Q9-.i0^ also referred to as Land Use Application No. -» I (we) understand that in executing this ac)cnowledgement, I (we) am (are) not as)ced to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Date c >:J Property Owner Date Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form I (we) of S72Q aJ. /?&»■ forint name(771 [print aadressi have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 4£--M M. (i), also referred to as Land Use Application No. 1 (we) understand that in executing this a.lcnowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (arc) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner :2A 90 bate Property Owner Date If you have p^"2srsJbmit ylur*com^^ ® z2nfng*0«io ” al^e"a“ 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. • • • • Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement Form I („e) Do.v lMAl^.10^ of 0/i-,U?, [print name(s).[print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at ^ “Iso referred to as Land Ose Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement# I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Daxe P^perty Date If you have any information that may assist the City # 15,5 4 t • Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form I („e) AiTM^f ,ioC Tprint name / * 1 f-------------------- [print address J have reviewed the plans £or the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at a/.AJ■ MM JjK- _ also referred to as Land Use Application No. _____• I (we) understand that in executing this acjtnowledgement, I (we) am (are) not as).ed to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the Improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor ’s project or use requires Council^approyal. . t/ cr Property Owner / Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the ehis bind use Application, please submit your comments to the Building zSiing Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. #1 '^4 ^ > -I 4 e.--^ « • • • Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form j ^A^/^-tTALA______ of '0^ . [print nameisn [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at ^Ka^'O yV-/-f/ZoH jilf.UJ, also referred to as Land Use Application No I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval Date /> ZO> /990 Property Owner/ /•?LJy/./ny Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. #1554 • • I . ■ . i* ’ ■ • I ^ 16 6 4 if 4t;i- —* rv t o r I. f • • • 1 •»•■*:■ • • • •» e t-- /;*.f :.H'\. .; < 1 - - •. r • ' , • ' ' • • « ' • ■ ■ 1 • • • • r‘ ■•%o. ‘'411 • r f i *^>P 4» • ■ i ■ • •••' >!• i.i-v. *y -U r To:Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: August 13# 1990 #1555 Landstar, Inc., 2501 Old Beach Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Information Item Only The application has not been scheduled for further review as new findings and additional information submitted to the City by the Corps of Engineers will require additional review of the application. The application is scheduled as an information item only for your meeting this evening because of the unusual public interest in this application. The City has been advised by various neighbors that pamphlets have been placed in the mailboxes of the surrounding neighborhoods advising that the application will be reviewed at the Planning Commission meeting. It is impossible to contact all persons notified that the Planning Commission will not be reviewing and acting on the subdivision at tonight's meeting. If members of the public appear to question the application, it may be appropriate for staff to conduct a brief review and to advise that the application will be reviewed in detail at an upcoming Planning Commission meeting. Isv From: Date: Subject: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Crono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardron Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator August 17, 1990 #1560 John & Roberta Henrich, 4125 Highwood Road - Conditional Use Permit - Continuation of Public Hearing 7 Application - Request to construct retaining walls in 0-75' zone. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Additional Submittals from Applicant Regarding Retaining Wall Design S Screening Exhibit B - Planning Commission Action Notice 7/20/90 Exhibit C - Memo & Exhibits of 7/12/90 Discussion - This item was tabled at your July 16th meeting in order for applicants to provide additional detail on the wall locations and design for review by the City Engineer. The attached items in Exhibit A have been submitted, and the City Engineer has revisited the site to gain a better sense of the applicant's goals in constructing these walls. Generally, the City's philosophy in past applications has been to allow retaining walls at the lakeshore in cases where they are the only reasonable method of protecting the lakeshore bank from erosion or slumping. The intent is to maintain the character of the lakeshore as natural as possible by providing as much stability as is necessary to keep the hill sides and banks in place. Also, in general the City in most past applications has not allowed retaining walls merely for aethestic reasons or for convenience of maintenance. In a few past cases, where it was shown that changes to lakeshore grade would bring the lakeshore back to a pre-existing condition, grad*^ changes have been allowed (case in point is a steep uniformly sloped lawn area for James Hoff at 2056 Shadywood Road, in which he was able to prove by soil borings that the lakeshore yard had been filled to create the non-characteristic slope, and he was allowed to revert it back to original grades). In the Downev request currently being considered on Casco Point Road, again the Engineer's recommendation is to construct only the minimal walls which are necessary to retain the banks. In th*e Henrich application, the only area that is exhibiting erosion and instability is at the easterly end of the proposed two wall system. This is a steep slope (approximately 2:1) Zoning File #1560 August 17/ 1990 Page 2 which is showing some signs of surface erosion, but no slumping. This bank does not appear to be in danger of a massive erosion event. There is no question that placement of the two walls will allow easier mowing of the short stretch of hill that is currently maintained below the existing rock wall and sidewalk, however, that is such a short stretch of slope that its maintenance is certainly not impossible as“is. From an aesthetic standpoint, the proposed walls will, even when screened, change the visual character of the shoreline in this location from a low grassy slope to a more intensive series of artificial walls. The existing wooden and rock retaining walls have absolutely no screening and to a certain degree provide a hodge-podge effect from the lake. City Engineer's Recommendation - The City Engineer has reviewed the application and has made the following comments: 1. Except at the easterly end of the proposed wall system, there is no real structural necessity for the walls. 2. The flat terraces which would be created by the walls would have some effect in providing better infiltration into the soil of whatever run-off comes down the hill. 3. If the wall system is approved, the entire wall system (both existing and new) should be screened with vegetation to reduce their visual impact from the lake. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission would appear to have the following options: 1. Approve the walls as proposed, finding that at the east end some structural stabilization of the bank is necessary and finding that the terraces created by the walls will have a beneficial effect in enhancing run-off infiltration, subject to screening all of the wall systems in the 0-75' lakeshore area. 2. Approve a limited retaining wall system just in the area to the east of the existing rock wall where some structural stabilization is necessary. Such recommendation could include a screening requirement. 3. Deny the walls in their entirety, finding that they are generally for aesthetic reasons and perhaps direct applicants to find an alternate method of stabilizing the small area where some stabilization is necessary. I Bonestroo Anderlik & |\J| Associates Engineers & Architects ORO C So^flTDa «WC^ W Fi iOlcpn C AraenjL PQ L SevM. liefMi \fftf. Pi Jiwet C 09CTX Pt Ciefyii Com M C Noyri tpoeff G Jcr^yricnc Sinjn M COC^ CM Kein A GMfOA. «nj« vu *0fif/. Al OortA'd C Euf^g-CL Pi vcr7 A letyeoA Myi A H»fi|oa p% >flic T nrwirum. toefff wtffcne. Pi 09^ Q UiiM. Pt Thomii W PiUfiQtx Pi. Mcruff C Pi J9frgi P Miiina Pi Pinnm p AAdcnon. f I ff Ao.«i P£ ietoerrC twiSfttAiA ThoTRM I. Angus Pt H0^$f9 K Urtfom. Pt Oimfi JL logerroA. Pf mjai A. Seta At ^tip J Ctt>AtA f I timjr* MMvxt Pi t Mar» o \vm PI lnomj»£ AfietfMA AIA <07 » tydAor* Pf viir, 8 jenjfa p| 1 PMCICI Crtfvrf n. Pg. »^C Pfumjrt. AiA AJCP *^0 Ppwfi P| r <<190 riDMff Pf C'vmfi A Srvmon U«)M PJw^tAJiy HaWM Orion August 17, 1990 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55S23 Attn: Mt. Mike Gaffron Ret File No. 139»1560 Henrich Application Dear Mike, Ve have reviewed the retainage walls proposed on the Henrich property. The walls will not provide a significant iaprovement in the stability of the lakeshore bank. The valla would prevent sooe minor erosion problems now occurring near the easterly end. The walls would provide some additional flat areas chat would reduce the storm water runoff slightly. If the walls are allowed, ve would recommend that the existing walls on the property also be camouflaged by plantings. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONSSTROO. ROSEKE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:li Land Use Application #1560 John and Roberta Henrich Landscaping to screen retaining walls 5 Weigela (4-5- ) 3 Mugho Pine (4’ ) 3 Cioldmound Spirea (2’) 4 50 ft. 6 ft.o^cPo d^o O Ao ^ 3 Juniper Mint Julep (3 1/2’) 5 Hardy Shrub Rose (4’ ) 3 Juniper Scandia (1 1/2’) u PRODUCT DESCRIPTION ALLAN BLOCK is a mortarless, stackable, concrete block retaining wail system consisting of three block shapes —standard block, angle block, and corner block. These blocks can be combined to form retaining walls in a wide variety of designs that will accommodate a diversity of soil conditions and structural needs. The ALLAN BLOCK SYSTEM answers a need in the landscaping industry by providing a block that is durable, versatile, attractive, lightweight and easy to install. ALLAN BLOCK'S unique combination of these qualities sets it apart from all other concrete landscape products. EASY INSTALLATION f • • ,• * !-v-. The beauty of ALLAN BLOCK is not only in its attractive appearance but also in its simple design. ALLAN BLOCKS are comparably lightweight (the standard / - block weighs only 51 pounds—nearly one-half that “^5^ of competitive products), uncomplicated, and ' manageable by semiskilled labor. ALLAN BLOCK ^ is designed to automatically establish the necessary set-back angle and lock the blocks together from one course to the next. There is no need for interlocking pins. - mortar or preservative treatments. Walls are formed simply by placing the first row or course of blocks in a shallow trench, stacking additional courses so that joints between blocks are staggered, and backfilling with granular fill behind the base course and each additional row. STRONG & DURABLE ALLAN BLOCKS are cured with high strength concrete containing Portland cement (3,000 p.s.l. compressive crushing strength) to yield blocks and retaining walls that weather the harshest of natural elements. The front lip, while establilshing the automatic set-back, resists over 3.500 pounds of shear force per block. The long-term benefits of a low maintenance ALLAN BLOCK wall are an important advantage over other timber and concrete products.. PRODUCT DESCRIPTION GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS Coverage: Shipping: Set-Back; Each block has an area of .7 square feet (6.5"x15.5 “). There are Fourteen (14) ALLAN BLOCKS per 10 square feet of wall area. There is an average of 50 ALLAN BLOCKS per pallet. A truck can deliver between 8 and 12 pallets. The average set-back is 1-1/2 “ back for each 6“ rise, or 3" back per foot of wall height. This yields a slope of approximately 1 2®. . •'• A i*.—* • • N- - • • ^ . INSTALLATION GENERAL INFORMATION flSI: GETTING STARTED Before beginning construction, analyze your site and develop a general layout and accurate plan. Carefully consider topography and drainage patterns. Design your wall so rainwater Is routed around the ends rather than over the top. Be sure to check local building codes, lot lines, and burled utility line locations. If you have any questions or unusual site conditions, consult a qualified engineer, a landscape architect, or your nearest ALLAN BLOCK distributor. ORDERING MATERIAL Once you've completed your plan, measure the total square footage of retaining wall needed. Multiply the wall length by Its average height to find the total square footage. Be sure to consider the amount of base wall which must be buried to lock in the bottom of each wall. VtfALLHEIGHT 2* 3* 4' AMOUNT TO BURY 4 inches 6 inches 8 Inches f^e-engineered design chans are available lor walls over 4' Each ALLAN BLOCK is 15 1/2 inches long by 6 1/2 Inches high. Fourteen ALLAN BLOCKS win cover 10 square feet. Multiply the total square footage by 1.4 to find the total number of ALLAN BLOCKS needed. Be sure to account for the comer blocks and the angle blocks needed for your particular plan. PREPARE THE FOUNDATION Begin by stripping the top soil and vegetation. Excavate a trench along the planned location of each new wall deep enough to accommodate the amount of buried block required and a thin layerof granular base. Fill in the a'-S' layer of compacted sand or gravel at the bottom for leveling. All walls should be constructed on stable, compacted ground to prevent major settling. Footings are usually unnecessary on wails 4 ft. and lower. In heavy soil conditions, provide drainage for any water build-up behind the wall. Install drain tile behind the base course of each wall so that the water will drain around the sides and out. INSTALL THE BASE COURSE Begin by placing ALLAN BLOCKS side by side on the prepared foundation with the raised lip facing out Level each block from side to side and from front to back. Check for level often and use a string line as you go to check for straightness. Carefully backfill around the base blocks and pack to lock In place. Complete the entire base course in this manner. 011/88 INSTALLATION GENERAL INFORMATION ADD THE BACKnU. Backfill behind the base course and each successive ALLAN BLOCK course with well draining granular fill (sand, gravel, pea rock, mixed soil). Clay and organic topsoil are not recommended. Also fill the voids and pockets In and between ALLAN BLOCKS with granular fill and carefully tamp down. INSTALL ADDITIONAL COURSES Position the second and additional layers of ALLAN BLOCK over the base course by staggering the edges to be in the middle of the block beneath it. The setback angle is automaticaliy established by placing the block tightly against the front lip of the blocks beneath it. Backfill in the same manner as you complete each course. CURVED AND SERPENTINE WALLS ALLAN BLOCK walls are adaptable to complex designs and site conditions. Serpentine and curved walls are built with ALLAN BLOCK'S special angle block. Inside curves are built simply by placing the front faces edge to edge and fanning blocks to meet the curve. For larger outside curves merely alternate regular blocks with angle blocks to form any line. For tighter outside curves (r<3ft) all angle blocks will be needed. After your base course is laid, simply stagger the blocks inthe successive rows above to continue the curved wall and to provide the interlocking strength that the ALLAN BLOCK system is designed to provide. CORNER BLOCKS ALLAN BLOCK'S special comer blocks have a dual purpose. If the erxf of any wall is "stepped down".the right or left hand corners provide a finished end for each layer. For walls requiring 90" comers.the comer block can be alternated or linger grooved* to provide a perfect comer. FOR TALLER, REINFORCED WALLS ALLAN BLOCK'S unique design allows for a variety of installation techniques to achieve strength in taller walls. Earth anchors. GEOGRID fabrics, rebar and poured concrete can be integrated to provide strength for large scale projects. Consult your ALLAN BLOCK distributor for pre^ngineered plans. 011/88 h'J • • A ^ II INSTAliiATION GUIDELINES - PILASTER & FOOTING SYSTEMS flb Allan Block* /N I ) KEY H - HEIGHT OF WAU. AEOVE GRADE B - BURIED BLOCK OEPiH 0 ■ OIST. FROM TOP OF EASE TO ANCHORS. L - LENGTH OF ANCHORS S - horizontal SPACING OF COLUMNS T - TMCKNESS OF FOOTING W ■ WIDTH OF FOOTING DESIGN PARAMETERS: (PMJVSTERS) • BASE: MINIMUM 6“ OF COMPACTED SAND AND GRAVEL UNDER CONCRETE FOOTING • FOOTING SIZE BASED ON BEARING VALUE OF SOIL BELOW WALL AND MOMENT AT COLUMN BASE. > I DRAIN FILL O (SLOPE TO DRAIN) ^ NATIVE SOIL OASE CONCRETE TYPICAL SECTION mm TYPICAL ELEVATION I. L rff= *—» c« __Ui • Lf»lc:111 1.11 _y • • • • • 1 • V * * ■ —F pilaster lu m IL GRID ■t—t s i ^ f iLu iU _ i.^TI.H III—m rn . ..'1^ i Ilj 1 FOOTINGS BE CESICNEO ACCORDINGLY.GENERAL GUIDELINES 1 GRID TYPE AND LENGTH ARE DEPENDANT ON SUE SPECIFIC SOIL PARAMETERS ^0 SHALL 2 VERTICAL ANCHOR RODS WITHIN THE UNITS SHALL BE FULLY ENCASED IN CONCRETE. 8. FOaOW APPLICABLE LOCAL BUILDING COOES IN DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION Th« obovc quulclin** provid* qencrol (nformol'on on IP* u»« of the Alton Block System. Thi« informotion does not pfovtde precise desiqn deloiis or specificotionsActuol proieci detoils. desiqn ond specificotions snoil be verified and opproved by o quoMf-ed prolessionoi enqmeer. DESIGN TABLES - PILASTER & FOOTING SYSTEMS ($=34 ‘) SOIL TYPE: COMPACTED COARSE GRAIINED SOIL. CLEAN SAND OR GRAVEL LEVEL SLOPE equivalent TLUID PRESSURE: 25 PCf 1 CORE FILLED I - #7 BAR (TYPE A) H 8 T w A 11 X X GRID TYPE PILAS TYPE S 2 .5 x^ 3 .5 4 .7 5 1.0 .5 X4 0 SR2 A 60 6 1.0 .75 2.0/^ ^25 5^' ^'5 0 SP2 A •t.U 7 1.0 .75 2.0/" .Xo SR2 A 4 0 8 1.0 1.0 2.0/^ >X25 X70 SR2 B 40 H IL 5 TO 1 SLOPE H B T w X^A LIX GRID TYPE PILAS TYPE S 2 .5 3 5 -AA 4 1.0 X K 5 1.0 \ 0 ,%1 SR2 A 60 6 1.0 .75 2 ox .X:5!1 Xo SR2 A 4.0 7 1.0 .75 2 ox X25’"XXe 0 SR2 6 40 8 1.0 1.0 2 0/ X?5 i>oy\ Xol SR2 B 3.0 equivalent fluid pressure 27 PCF 2 CORES filled 2 - |7 BARS ;type B) • •• • \2 CORES FILLED 4 - #7 BARS (rrPE C) 3 TO 1 SLOPE H B T w X^ A LI / X^01 grid TYPE PILAS TYPE 5 2 .5 / 3 .5 4 1 0 .5 1.5/ X25 4 ^ X^o SR2 A 60 5 1.0 5 15/ xX5 45/^ X ^0 SR2 A 6.0 6 10 .75 2.0/ X^25 50X x^o SR2 A 4 0 7 10 .75 2.0/ A 2^ 5 5/ /6.0 SR2 B 4 0 8 1.0 1.0 2.0/ X^25 X/0 SR3 C 40 equivalent fluid PRESSURE; 29 PCF 2 TO 1 SLOPE H 0 T W/' /A Ll / X^D1 GRID TYPE PILAS TYPE s 2 5 // 3 5 r / 4 10 1 5 ' 5/ y'^25 X/3 0 SR2 A 4.0 5 1.0 .5 X At A /4 0 SR2 A 4.0 6 1.0 75 20 A A 2^XXso,SR2 6 4.0 7 1.0 .75 2.0 A A^^5 t.oy Xo SR3 C 40 a 1.0 to 2.0 A X^5 7.^ x^o SR3 C 3.0 EOUrVALENT FLUID PRESSURE: 35 PCF SPECinC CONDITIONS 1. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE IN FEET. 2. REFER TO VARIABLES SHOWN ON THE INSTALLATION GUIDELINES SHEET. 5. UNIT FACE DIMENSIONS; 15 3/4 ’ WIDE BY 12" DEEP BY 7 1/2* HIGH 4. Tables based on f.s. for sliding equal to 15 and f.s. for overturning equal to 2 0 5. FOOTING DESIGN SHAU BE VERIFIED USING ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY OF SPECIFIC SITE FOUNDATION. 6. GRID SHALL BE CONTINUOUS ALONG WALL LENGTH 7. global STABILITY MUST BE CHECKED FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT 8. DESIGN ASSUMES A UNIT SOIL WEIGHT EQUAL TO 125 PCF. • Th« obov* dt>i9n tables prowde general information regarding the use of the Alton Block System. They do not provide precise design information or specif>cotions. Acluol project design shotl be verified ond approved by o quoiified professional engineer. CITY OP ORONO P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 473-7357 55323 ZONING FILE #1560 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice; 07/20/90 TO: John & Roberta Henrich 4125 Highwood Road Mound, MN 55364 COPIES TO: TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance Conditional Use Permit DATE OF MEETING: July 16, 1990 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against Planning Commission recommends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Applicant to provide detailed design for retaining wall tie-back system. 2. Stake the exact proposed wall locations (both ends, plus a midpoint) and advise staff when this is done so a site inspection can be made. 3. Provide a landscaping/vegetation plan for serening of the walls. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as Planning Commission on Monday, August 20, 1990; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Date: Subject: Michae]ffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator July 12, ;;990 #1560 John & Roberta Henrich, 4125 Highwood Road Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Application - Request for variance and conditional use permit to construct retaining walls and grade within the 0-75' protected lakeshore zone. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Pertinent Facts - Application Letter of Request Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Cross Section Site Plan Hardcover Calculations 1. The applicants propose to construct 2 retaining walls, each approximately 3%' in height, approximately 50' long, and approximately 28* and 38* from the shoreline. 2. Existing hardcover in the 0-75' zone is 8.2%, consisting of sidewalks, existing retaining walls, some rock over plastic, a small shed and a small pond area. Applicants propose to remove 410 s.f. of hardcover while adding 68 s.f., hence a net reduction from 1,004 s.f. existing down to 662 s.f., a reduction from 8.2% to 5.4%. 3. City Engineer Glenn Cook has reviewed the application on the site, and make the following verbal comments on July 12th: A) Applicant should provide detailed drawings of the tie- back system proposed for the retaining walls. B) Applicant should stake the end points and midpoints of each proposed wall for further review. Glenn feels that there may be justification for one wall, but possibly not for both depending on the exact locations proposed. Discussion - The proposed reduction in hardcover would appear to be an improvemen't to the property. It is apparent that existing retaining walls are necessary to keep the slope from washing down the hill. I 1^-O Zoning File #1560 July 12, 1990 Page 2 The City has in the past generally denied retaining walls where their installation was strictly for the convenience of maintenance than for actual protection of the lakeshore bank. In this case, additional information regarding the proposed location of the walls is needed to determine how many walls are necessary to stabilize the bank and where they should be located. Also, applicants should provide information as to how the walls will be screened to reduce their visibility from the lake. Staff Reconmendation - Staff recommends tabling the request pending additional information for review as follows: a. Provide tie-back system design; b. Stake the wall locations; c. Provide a landscaping/vegetation plan for screening. * • •0 CITY OP OROMO - GENERAL LAND USE PROPERTY LOCATION CITY OF OiiCm Fi^ME OFFICE Site Address 14’/'^ h mood 1 wPlJC0200000 2202M1P rf 01 un Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 0*7"* C0ul''‘^vl 7ij*45 /vfW/ /V Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name JoVm clx\A l^obert^ [VorthicK Address M^hcOGod l^ccccJ OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) ^"731-______ _Phone (work) _____ City Oronn zivS53(^^_ Phone (home) Name Phone Address City Zip Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg X $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS _ _ _ _ $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _ _ _ _ $250.00 Vacation _ _ _ _ $175.00 Easement Vacation _ _ _ _ $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _ _ _ _ $250.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _ _ _ _ $100.00 Appeals _ _ _ _ Other - see fee schedule • I • PRESENT OSE OP PROPERTY p .o Present Zoning District Present Use of Property esidential Other “Ttpeoify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail:rui 2. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1, Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11* X IT* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Icnowledge. Applicant's signature ^ ^Date // OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ac)cnowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request Owner's erxzicarion oz znis ^ Q • Date 0 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. L 05 y t)0 Land Use Variance 4115 and 4125 Highwood Road We are requesting a land use variance to keep the hill from falling slowly into the lake. The hill is slumping. This slumping is causing walk ways to tilt at strange angles causing difficult walking. The slumping is also causing the beautiful rock retaining wall to crack and lean backwards. This wall is an integral part to the structure of the yard. The current hill is ( at places ) in excess of 45 degrees and most of it exceeds 30 degrees. These steep angles makes it impossible to safely mow any grass which may grow there, and due to this situation, there is normally more weeds than grass. Ov’er the years low maintenance ground cover has been put in but weeding this area is very difficult due to the angle of the hill. Weed killer is out of the question due to run off into the lake. We would be adding less than 68 square feet of hard cover and would be removing 410 square feet of hard cover. The hill as it currently exists is deteriorating and impossible to manage. These changes will improve the looks of the yard and at the same time the terracing would slow the rush of water during rain storms which enters the lake directly and allow it to percolate slower. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS The retaining walls would be constructed of 5X6 treated lumber. They would be nailed together with timber spikes and there would be an L-shaped tie down timber sunk at least 48 inches below grade and attached to the retaining wall with angle irons and wood screws. M i *• RUN DATE OA/14/90 BATCH 002 PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP AOOR 0HT4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR 0HT4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP AOOR ONT^ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY Ol^t^RS LIST SB 07-117-25 45 0011 04199 NORTH SHORE DR UNITED CH HOSP ASSN FAIRVIEH COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2512 SO 6TH ST MPLS rtl 554S4 58 07-117-25 44 0011 04091 HIGHHOOD RO F L JOHNSON SDL FOSS FREDERIC JOHfiSON 4091 HIGKHOOO RD MOUND MN 55591 58 07-117-21 44 0014 04105 HIGHHOOD RD CHARLES E DA MART HILLIAM G BRICKLEY 4105 HIGHHOOD HOUND MN 5S564 58 07-117-25 44 0017 04125 HIGHHOOD RO J H A R J HENRICH JOHN H A ROBERT J HENRICH 4125 HIGHHOOD RO ORONO MN 55564 58 07-117-25 44 0020 04167 HIGHHOOD RO MERLIN L HALVERSON MERLIN L HALVERSCX4 4175 HIGHHOOD RO MOUND M^4 55564 58 07-117-25 44 04190 HIGHHOOD JAMES P ZUCCARO JAMES P ZUCCARO 4190 HIGHHOOD RO HOUr^O MT4 55564 0024 RO 58 07-117-25 44 0009 04075 HIGHHOOD RD JAN AKERBERG JAN A NORA AKERBERG 4075 HIGHHOOD ROAD MOUr^O MN 55564 58 07-117-25 44 0012 04099 HIGHHOOD RO OLLIS L NELSON ETAL OLLIS L NELSON 4099 HIGHHOOD RD MOUND m 55564 58 07-117-25 44 0015 04109 HIGHHOOD RD GEORGE H APPIEBAUM GEORGE APPLEBAUM 4109 HIGHHOOD RO MOUt O m 55564 58 07-117-25 64 04149 HIGHHOOD LARRY H KARKELA LARRY N KARKELA 4149 HIGHHOOD RO MOUND m 55564 0018 RO 58 07-117-25 44 0021 04175 HIGHHOOD RD MERLIN L HALVERS0I4 MERLIN L HALVERSON 4175 HIGHHOOD RO M01Jt40 MJ4 55564 58 07-117-25 44 0025 04162 HIGHHOOD RD PATRICIA A LINDLAN PATRICIA A LINDLAN 5880 lOLEHOOD RO MOUND m 55564 V-“p U’ REPORT NO. PI<»35<i01 PAGE I 36 07-117-23 A4 0010 0A079 HIGHHOOD RO JOHN T SANBORN ETAL J T SANBORN ^079 HIGHHOOD RD HOUND ttl 5536<^ 38 07-117-23 94 0013 04101 HIGHHOOD RD EVA THEOBALD EVA A THEOBALD 4101 HIGHHOOD ROAD H0UT4D m 55364 $8 07-117-23 44 0015 04115 HIGHHOOD RO J H S R J HENRICH JOtm H I ROBERT J HENRICH 4125 HIGHHOOD RO ORO^JO MM 55364 3B 07-117-23 44 04156 HIGHHOOD FRANCES H HILSON JOHN F TESAR 4156 HIGHHOOD RO MOUND MN 55364 0019 RD R 1 38 07-117-23 44 0022 04195 HIGHHOOD RO GIB SCHAUER MARK A Fir«4EY 4145 HIGHHOOD RD IKXJNO Ml 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0025 04174 HIGHHOOD RO H 8 OEVAAN ALE OEVAAN HERBERT A LORETTA OEVAAN 17605 SUSAN DRIVE MINNETONKA Itl 55343 t L C'.• / /T& IK o o o *• \ ■ i • I RUN DATE 06/1^/90 HErt4EPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST BATCH 002 PROP ADDR OHT4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 38 07-117-23 A4 0027 OA166 NIGHHOOD RD HAL OEVAAN HERBERT A LORETTA OEVAAN 17605 SUSAN DR MINNETONKA MN 553^3 PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 07-117-23 64 04140 HIGHHOOD PHILLIP M OTTO PHILLIP M OTTO 4140 NIGHHOOD RO MOUND MN 55364 0030 RD PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 38 07-117-23 44 0033 041G8 HIGHHOOD RO DAD BAXTER DAVID C A DEBRA J BAXTER 4108 HIGHHOOD ROAD MOUND MN 55364 PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NaME/ADOR 38 07-117-23 44 0036 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED BRUCE J MOLUMBY BRUCE J MOLUMBY 4116 HIGHHOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0039 Cl 38 07-117-23 04 0028 04150 HIGHHOOD RO ROSS MASSETT ROSS NASSETT 4150 HIGHHOOD RD H0Ut40 MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0031 04132 HIGHHOOD RO SCOTT G A CATHERINE ANDERSON SCOTT G A CATHERINE ANDERSON 4132 HIGHHOOD ROAD HOUT40 MT4 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0034 04104 HIGHHOOD RO GAB SAUER GLEN A BEVERLY SAUER 4104 HIGHHOOD RO HOUTTO MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0037 00038 ADDRESS UT4ASSIGNED HARREN KLIPSTEIN JAMES A LISOETH CLEARY 41D9 r40 SHORE OR MOUtTO MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0040 PROP ADDR 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 01535 HIGHHOOD LA OHNER NAME HARREN J KLIPSTEIN E G CELMS A L S CELMS TAXPAYER JAMES 1 LISBETH CLEARY ERIK G A LAURIE S CELMS NAME/ADDR 4109 NO SHORE DR 5607 BErUAMIN ST N E •MOUND MN 55364 MPLS M»J 55410 — 58 0^-117-25 44 0042 ' PROP ADDR 0153S HIGHHOOD LA OHNER NAME E 6 CELMS A L S CELMS TAXPAYER ERIK G I LAURIE S CELMS TOTAL BATCH 002 000S4 ' NAME/ADDR 5607 BENJAMIN ST N E MPLS m1 55418 REPORT NO. PX43540I PAGE 4 38 07-117-23 44 0029 04148 HIGHHOOD RO JANET L EIDE JANET L EIDE 4148 HIGHHOOD RO MOUND rtT 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0032 04116 HIGHHOOD RD BRUCE J MOLUMBY BRUCE J MOLUMBY 4116 HIGHHOOD ROAD MOLATO MT4 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0035 04104 HIGHHOOD RO GAB SAUER GLEN A BEVERLY SAUER 4104 HIGHHOOD RO MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0038 04109 NORTH SHORE OR HARREN J KLIPSTEIN JAMES A LISBETH CLEARY 4109 rX) SHORE OR MOUT40 MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0041 01535 HIGHHOOD LA E G CELMS A L S CELMS ERIK G A LAURIE S CELMS 3607 BENJAMIN ST N E MPLS MN 55418 i X to r-A #1 h ^ 0 /✓ ■■lira ^ I I f f j (4^ 1 \ i’ • t HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) (^-7^ 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone b i m ^ Total Hardcover in Zone ft' 1 A,House • X .•i LENGTH X . iWIDTH / ^ X . .X _5=3 X _ B.£AgAttfi 1 2 » 1 ^X „ _ fV• ^ C.Driveway ,X X D.Sidewalk 1 X —r X S X S 1 e.^ATIO/Deck X < F.Landscape •• X a 30 , AREAS underlain BY _ X 8 5 PLASTIC SHEETING X s - X a s G. O^tIr^4 _ X 10 1^0 s /,OCr\J Total Property Area in Zone S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.B B X 100 % r Kfi^' K'^Aa.Tv k M \ I r: / . TS yJ-^ / vr E # / K- -i K oo f : i I I • i ; * \ < * . ; t ? ; 4 • t * I Vn v.*\ '■^i / * / / / ?si -4 ;T^ To:'Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Froa: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: August 14r 1990 #1561 Christine Beck, 3820 Cherry Avenue Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing Christine Beck and her son James Beck will be present at your meeting and apologize for the misunderstanding of the date of your July meeting. If members have misplaced the original packets prepared for this item for the July meeting, please advise the clerical staff by Friday a.m. so that packets can be copied for delivery with Friday agendas. Isv Planning Conunission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: August 17, 1990 #1565 Richard Anderson, 3205 Crystal Bay Road Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing Application - Request for after-the-fact hardcover variance for deck List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Additional Hardcover Information Notice of Planning Commission Action 7/20/90 Memo and Exhibits of 7/13/90 Discussion Applicant met with staff on Monday, August 13th to review what additional information would be necessary to make the application complete. We agreed that he would provide the following: 1.Sketch with dimensions of pre-existing hardcover areas which are no longer existing. 2.Sketch of proposed retaining walls at rear of property, and noting hardcover associated with same. 3.Elevation views/preliminary construction plans for screen porch and 3 season porch additions. 4.A determination of how the deck will be revised (either lowered or cut back) to avoid need for a rai ling which would make that deck need to meet a 10' setback. The applicant has provided a sketch of a pre-existing trapezoid shaped patio that was removed from behind the house about the same time the deck was built, and also has verified for staff that the patio along side the house where the deck is now, was 8' wide and continued along the house to an old shed which is now gone. This entire area was 8' x 42' or about 336 s.f. The net result is that, based on the best information we can come up with, hardcover originally before the deck was constructed was 47.9%. In conjunction with the deck and rear patio removal, this reduced to the currently existing 47.3%. Based on the pre-existing hardcover levels, Planning Commission may be in a position to recommend a final hardcover limit for which applicant ‘can work with his landscape architect to provide a plan. Zoning File #1565 August 17 1990 Page 2 Applicant notes he has not been able to reach his landscape architect, and therefore has not worked out the retaining walls or grading situation at the rear of the property. He also notes that his plan will have to be based to a degree on the extent of hardcover he is ultimately allowed. Also, applicant has not mair^r ;.;fogress toward providing construction plans for the screen poi'cv t-' 3 season porch additions. However, he has decided that he will agf,- to lowering a rectangular portion of the deck in order to meet the height limitation to avoid construction of a railing. This would therefore leave him with a platform deck by definition, which the zoning code allows to be constructed within 2' of a lot line. Staff Recommendation Absent the detail on the screen porch and 3 season porch, applicant is requesting that Planning Commission determine what percent hardcover will be allowed overall on the property, so that he can have his landscape architect provide a final plan. Recall that the proposed landscaping plan reduced hardcover to 31.7%, but retained the deck as is. If Planning Commission gives applicant direction as to a hardcover percentage to meet, staff would recommend tabling the request with that direction, allowing applicant to submit a final proposal to staff no later than September 7, 1990, to be reviewed by the Planning Commission on September 17, 1990. Isv VT7tofJA^}4a^^ /^<^=^ICAAir / M " w U Cs^ ^PLAe^ A pf^o (/OhHe^ ^ 0<A. 33Ci» -S*^, ’t7*H»'/^t/vr^. 2 • /r^o^T^'Or^ r”//*^ tth? Tje.uc'rt»i:i /4 aJ /A< A T^/V=»e-T:o»iii iTtSAAe ^ /2^'^U(r£i . fAt></^ ^xtz^zjrz-^ dirM/AJ^ 7W* 14' / IT' ^ f/^ O -4a /1^' ' ___________/nrz )<:)' •TTm^S “To 2-2-C s :^. '?3 “'2^rO ^e^ri-e:i r '1^T4u Pr^€'^e9</5 ‘r7^»Ci /^AAJbCoi/es^^- '7>4^ D«r6#c. c^^A.S ^Ufi^T /S 5 ^9/2. - V86-i-SSC. ■>• 2^0 = Y^gO s^ T^T>Ar*f te^S 'H' P m«S ru& PAmvSKitii Pc-ws fi4T70 - ^7*^ y» HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKS!' •’ (circle one) 0-75’ ^*^75-250]]) 250-500' 500-1000 p’ft aricover In Zone ou le I —j —-u"_ b. Garage c. Driveway <3. Sidewalk •. Patio/ Deck h f. Landscape areas underlain by plastic sheeting f. Other 0 ^5.8 width 1-1 li ik. u. TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE Existing Ilnrdcovcr I ( Total Existing Hardcover x 100 Lot 7»rca Within Zone (^2, ^ ■2nj« . 2 L^\u= • _t CAl_a,'.bA'\UO$ 0V\c^M To : _ A 'Vi. ?:'iNTT added In zones Width TOTAL 42^ ■ ^4 ~TlAe l e-Jt-u 'iXT'vt. ".;*T tvl-X^-crT^ O'f W'at ^d'^U'-’AA BE ADDED moved» if anys S a f a 8 • f e 8 • f e s.f • Sef • (2) Width /I D uk ) ^ A-ttbrtVpA '1d'"Sui^ ^\k 'oA'P ~ IN' 'TTu‘0 tviiDGNceV) 'b'-pi'ioAi-' O'.Vvl' iVcfc'f'V 3), . TOTAL E REMOVED S.f. s.f.» s.f. s.f s..f. (3) 'Y\\e^ '^e.i'Av'C' A j (mT-ikc -v> To bo Removed 3?73 Final __________ s.f. ___________ s.f. s.f. (1) Proposed Hardcover I ■ Line (4) x 100 line (1) s.f. (4) X 100 -s.f. ^p.aTYT :H;; qf^ • -.• CITY of ORON Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay. MinnesoU 55323•Municipal Office. V I . 4 J#' I • • r s rJroHor^On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka July Ir 1988 Richard Anderson 3205 Crystal Bay Road Box 135 Minnetonka Beachr MN 55361 Re: Proposed Deck at 3205 Crystal Bay Road, Orono Dear Mr. .Anderson: The Building s Zoning Departnent is in receipt of your ®5^cation for an affer-the-falt building permit, «as reoexved by f i» June 22, 1988e A review of the application finds tnat tne information needed for review is missing: Site improvement Plan (driveways/landscaping/sidewalks/deoks/eto.) Specific Building Plans (2 sets required): Exterior Elevations Details and Sections Varianoe Application Required - Contact Zoning Department Immediately 473-7357 (hardcover variance) Review of your application will not continue untp the *f* reca^^d Failure to submit required items immediately may result in citatioM being issued. Please contact the Building i Zoning Department at 473-7357 if you have any questions. - - Sincerely, ' ^Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning i Zoning Administrator MPG/tln BUILDING* ZONING - 473-7337 assessing administration a finance - 473-7338 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7339 / //. I o / -/ J / tr ~7s--7^' rx/7s)-»-Cvs^^-/i./.44 ;r- 2fo' >r 2^. y v^x.B ^ >r /5.3 /.^/ y //^7 00% I2,2,.rs' '— 5^. I X’ < ^ S-./ ^./ >^ 2.3 . I the he shore Korthsast- first •elictiona -IV. tion-of-----1 .• ^*4 I ‘t t~* : nt t'.e point ^ .ho Great I-ortnem .ine bet-ccn Lots'li ur.d 2 in caid BlorJc 2, iirii' lino bctucen s'lid Lots 1 and 2 and sar.e .'^rtini^ rifht et .’’n an^le of 82^55* frorr. last- •theastorl/ doflectir.r: rirht at an ar.flo ol > actvuil point of becinninc of the tn^'t of Isnd »einnirt.' foi thcaotorly on tho extension of suld *nt r.ei.r.‘J..‘r cornor; thence contlnuir.t fcrtheuct- :tted ctroot now vacated vhic!. abuts upon tho •th of t'"o jntorsection of t’f'« of -r C>2l - Hz- = /(• ^ SI. 2T)(cr 'll 2(o 1 CfTVf OF aRQwa CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323•Municipal 0£fic« On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka February 1/ 1909 Richard Anderson 3205 Crystal Bay Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Re; Deck Construction at 3205 Crystal Bay Road^ Orono Dear Mr* Anderson: On June 22, 1988, the Building & Zoning Department received you application for an after-the-fact building permit. On July 1st, you wer notifed that the application was incomplete and the following informatio was required; Site Improvement Plan (driveways/landscaping/sidewalks/decks/etc.) Specific Building Plans (2 sets required); Exterior Elevations Details & Sections Variance Application Required (hardcover and setback) Your failure to provide the required submittals leaves us nc alternative but to initiate legal proceedings against you. Action will b» withheld until February 13, 1989., If at that time you comply, citations will be issued and the matter referred to the attorney for further legal action. I you have any questions or if you hav a problem meeting this deadline, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, L^e Oman, Field Inspector LO/tln Enclosure - Variance Application cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffrcn, Asst Planning s Zoning Administrator Thoi^as J. Jacobs, Building fi Fire Inspector BUILDING a ZONLNC - 473-7357 /SSESSINC administration a finance - 473-7338 PL'BLIC WORKS - 473-7159 CITYof ORONO Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 • Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka July 10, 1989 Richard Anderson 3205 Crystal Bay Road Box 135 Minnetonka Beach, MN 55361 Re: Deck built without a permit at 3205 Crystal Bay Road Dear Mr. Anderson: On ’■ «i> •• 1, 1989 the City again informed you that there was some <?r»;.ation missing in an after-the-fact application for a deck constructed on your property without a building permit. These items are as follows; 1. Site improvement plan (driveways/landscaping/sidewalks decks/etc.). 2. Specific buildings plans (2 sets required) showing exterior elevations and details and sections. 3. Variance (hardcover) application required - contact the Zoning Department immediately at 473-7357. The above noted items must be received by the City before July 19r 1989 or citations will be issued and the matter will be referred to the prosecuting attorney for further legal action. If you have any questions feel free to contact the Building & Zoning Department. Sincerely, Lyle Oman, Field Inspector LO/tln cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Thomas J. Jacobs, Building 6 Fire Inspector 6UILDINGa ZONING - 47J 7357 ASSESSING administration a finance - 473-7358 I’L HI 1C WORKS - 473-7359 OF QRONa CITYof ORONO Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323• Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka July 10, 1989 Richard Anderson 3205 Crystal Bay Road Box 135 Minnetonka Beach, MN 55361 Re: Deck built without a permit at 3205 Crystal Bay Road Dear Mr. Anderson: On Februarv 1, 1989 the City again informed you that there was some information missing in an after-the-fact application ..or a deck constructed on your property without a building permit. These items are as follows: 1. Site improvement plan (driveways/landscaping/sidewalks decks/etc.). 2. Specific buildings plans (2 sets required) showing exterior elevations and details and sections. 3. Variance (hardcover) application required - contact the Zoning Department immediately at 473-7357. The above noted items must be received by the City before Julv 19, 1989 or citations will be issued and the_ matter wilJ- °e referred to the prosecuting attorney for further legal action. If you have any questions feel free to contact the Building & Zoning Department. Sincerely, Lyle Oman, Field Inspector LO/tln • cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Thomas J. Jacobs, Building & Fire Inspector BtILOING a ZONING - 473-7337 assessing administration a finance - 473-7338 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 • . • *-*!**^^*-*^>- __________11-----------------ST ATI 0> MWIWUOTA . •» * •..>... * *' COUNTY ^4fl47(9/af1 ^ OiSTWCT COUNT ________ UNIfOWi CrrATlOH MO. ' ■ 389:044133 11 K0_£Ji.*_2Jt r C. H • 4 • •* •• ***** • -;» ' / Vs. '.-r-J STATf m N s s_i_U_ C\G.O M O ‘ ~nATCONN««^jj------------------------ fY£»HftGHT MttOHT ^ • • . . * • • •...* # • ' ;!••'. •*V"***.i^ *-*r*«' •’^>**-^Ov** ‘ ‘ i • i. — • - t* ‘ ^ ••• •■ • • •• *‘'I V ^ ',**•. '•.*'*-* •’ ' ••'•■* I I V '*“ ^*^ **'^; *• ‘!.«,* •*-.■! /•3-- V--V-.. I • • -1; -' - .. .•: sV '.".i V.jV i • *C-V ■ j'*• * • • • ./V < •* *« .f •» •->• , «»•'•**** "■— DEAR LYLE: THIS IS IN REPLY TO YOUR LETTER DATED JULY 10, 1989. AS YOU REMEM BER I CAME INTO YOUR OFFICE AND WE DISCUSSED THIS MATTER OF HARD COVER AND AN AFTER THE FACT BUILDING PERMIT. I DON'T HAVE THE EXACT DATE BUT IT WAS SOMEWHERE NEAR THE END OF APRIL. AT THAT TIME WE TALKED ABOUT GETTING A MASTER PLAN OF WHAT WE WANTED TO DO AS FAR AS LANDSCAPING THE ENTIRE PROPERTY. I HAVE TALKED TO TWO DIFFERENT FIRMS ABOUT DOING THAT FOR ME. I RULED OUT ONE OF THEM BECAUSE OF PRICE AND AM CURRENTLY WORKING ON TRYING TO GET BRIAN BUTTERFIELD OUT HERE TO DO IT FOR ME. BRIAN, UNFORTUNATELY, IS VERY BUSY AND IT IS HARD FOR HIM TO GET OVER HERE. I WILL CONTINUE TO PURSUE GETTING A MASTER PLAN THAT WE CAN WORK FROM SO PLEASE BE PATIENT. AFTER ALL, I’VE ONLY CONSTRUCTED THE DECK TO MINIMIZE THE RUNOFF AND EROSION FACTOR THAT WAS HAPPENING TO MY PROP»'RTY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE. SINCERELY, RICH i 1 • l* . .. ^ . • \ I'.- . • ••* * » < i » *. I • v' / ) HENNEPIN COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT DISPOSITION SUMMARY CITY OF ORONO TO:City Administrator Chief of Police FROM: DATE: Brian W. Ohm.<^ Prosecuting Actorney September 19^ 1989 ^ . s, C'J^ 0- r,t> DEFENDANT: Richard Anderson OFFENSE(S): Work without building permit DATE OF OFFENSE: July 20, 1989 ARRESTING OFFICER: Lyle Oman CONTROL NO.: SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS: This matter came on for an Arraignment on September 12, 1989. pursuant to negotiations with the defendant, the defendant agreed to plead guilty to the charge. DISPOSITION: UDon a plea of guilty to the work without building permit charge. Judge James D. Rogers sentenced the defendant to a S55.00 fine. ZNJC1192/1 . %• To:3205 Crystal Bay Road, Defendant Richard Anderson - From: Lyle Oman, Senior Building Inspector Date:January 2, 1990 Subject: Building Without a Permit 7/20/89 Citation issued. City Attorney finds no record. File to be sent to the City Attorney on 1/2/90. •-»« »T—r-r-• .fvi-'i-tii 11 III*' 1 . f.T .i 1-./U—li .^JL j J 1 CITY of ORONO CITY OF GRQNC^ Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 • Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka February 21, 1990 Richard Anderson 3205 Crystal Bay Road P.O. Box 135 Minnetonka Beach, MN 55361 Re: Deck Construction at 3205 Crystal Bay Road Dear Mr. Anderson: issued to you for building a deck without a ./U^lding pe.m.t. . plead guilty and paid a $55.00 fine. ’’’his letter is to inform you that payment of this fine in no p?ovliea''J ’o Building & Zoning Department, Sincerely, 3^(9- Lvle Oman, Senior Building Inspector LO/tlnEnclosure - Permit and Variance Applications cc: Jeanne A. Nabusth, Buildino I Zonin’; Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Bruce Vang, Building Inspector BUILDING A ZONING - 473-7357 ASSHSMNG ADMIMSTKAIION A IINANC I' - 473-7354 lAX-473-0510 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7350 RICHARD ANDERSON 3205 CRYSTAL BAY RD. WAYZATA, MN. 55391 DEAR LYLE; ► JU • * *o o I HAVE ENCLOSED A SURVEY MAP WITH THE MAJOR HARDCOVER AREAS HIGHLIGHTED. I WOULD LIKE TO GET THIS APPROVED WITHOUT JUMPING THROUGH THE HOOPS. I REALIZE THAT THERE SEEMS TO BE SOME MAJOR CONCERNS ABOUT HARDCOVER AREAS AROUND THE LAKE AND I TOO AM CON CERNED ABOUT RUNOFF. QUITE HONESTLY, THE MAIN REASON I BUILT THIS DECK IN QUESTION, WAS BECAUSE THE LAND AROUND MY FOUNDATION WAS ACTUALLY ERODING AWAY. I REALLY GOT GONCERNED AFTER THE HUGE RAIN TOOK OUT THE FRONT ROAD AND HAD VISIONS OF MY FOUNDATION DOING THE SAME AS THERE WAS A RIVER FLOWING AROUND MYFOUNDATION. WHEN I DID MY ADDITION, I TOOK OUT A CONCRETE DECK THAT WAS THERE IN THE SAME PLACE I PUT UP THE WOOD DECK. OBVIOUSLY, A WOOD SLAT DECK IS BETTER THAN A CONCRETE SLAB AS FAR AS WATER FLOW IS CONCERNED. THERE WASN'T ANY PROBLEM WITH ME REPLACING THE FRONT DECK (CONCRETE) WITH WOOD WHEN I GOT D^''E WITH MY ADDITION SO I ASSUMED THE SAME COULD BE DONE ON fHE SIDE. I KNOW I SLOWED THE RUNOFF FROM MY ROOF CONSIDERABLY. THERE ISN'T ANY PLASTIC UNDER THE DECK EITHER. I AM STILL CONCERNED WITH THE ADDITIONAL RUNOFF FROM THE BACK ROAD AREA. WITH THE RAINS OF THE LAST FEW DAYS, I HAVE MAJOR EROSION RIVERS GOING THRU MY SOIL RIGHT NOW. SOMETHING SHOULD BE DONE IN MY BACK YARD, BUT QUITE HONESTLY, I DON’T DARE DO ANY LANDSCAPING FOR FEAR OF HARD COVER PROBLEMS. NOT ONLY IS THE LAND ERODING, BUT MY TREE ROOTS ARE BECOMING MORE AND MORE PROMINENT. WHEN I DID MY ADDITION, I TOOK UP ALL THE CONCRETE SLAB WORK THAT WAS BACK THERE WITH THE IDEA OF REPLACING WITH SOME WOOD LOW LEVEL DECKS. I HAVE NOT DONE THAT YET BUT LIKE THE O.K. TO PROCEED WITH THOSE IDEAS. I UNDERSTAND YOUR POSITION WITH HAVING TO DO EVERYTHING BY THE BOOK, BUT PLEASE BE SENSITIVE TO MY NEEDS OF DOING WHAT I HAVE TO DO TO PROTECT AND BEAUTIFY MY PROPERTY. I BELIEVE I AM AND HAVE BEEN IN THE PAST SENSITIVE TO YOUR NEEDS (CITY OF ORONO). I REALIZE THAT THERE IS SOME CONCERN WITH THE FACT THAT I HAVE TWO HOUSES HERE, BUT, I HAVE NO INTENTIONS OF DOING ANY RENTING NOW OR IN THE FUTURE. IN THE PAST I HAVE WORKED WITH THE CITY WHEN THE SEWER WAS GOING IN. YOU NEEDED AN EASEMENT ON THE SAILORS WORLD PROPERTY AT THE LAST MINUTE AND WE GAVE YOU THAT EASEMENT IN GOOD FAITH SO YOUR PROJECT COULD GO ON AS SCHEDULE. WE WERE SUPPOSE TO GET ON APPRAISAL ON THE PIECE OF PROPERTY BY YOUR APPRAISER AND GET PAYMENT FOR THAT PERMANENT EASEMENT. WE STILL HAVEN'T RECIEVED ANY PAYMENT, SO I GUESS WE GAVE YOU THE PROPERTY. AND I THINK WE WERE PRETTY PATIENT WITH THE FRONT ROAD INCIDENT. I'M SURE YOU MIGHT TAKE ISSUE WITH THAT BUT TO WAIT TWO YEARS FOR A‘PROJECT THAT TOOK THE CONTRACTOR TWO DAYS TO DO, IS BEING PRETTY PATIENT. I HAVE GOTTEN PLENTY OF COOPERATION WITH YOU IN THE PAST, SO DON’T GET ME WRONG THAT I DON'T ENJOY LIVING IN THE CITY OF ORONO AND WORKING WITH THE CITY. ALL I WANT TO DO, IS GET MY PROPERTY UP TO DATE, SO PLEASE WORK WITH ME. Richard Anderson 3205 Crystal Bay Road March 30, 1990 Page 2 of 2 2. Plat map (obtained with the property owners list). /3?^i Construction plans for the existing deck, and for the Cjy:6posed sun room and screened porch. 4. The Planning Commission will likely expect to see a detailed plan of how you propose to "rework" the property (i.e. they will expect to see which items of hardcover you propose to remove, and where you intend to regrade or place new retaining walls. I would recommend that you consider hiring a landscape architect to advise you, and perhaps even to draw a comprehensive plan for your property that will address the problems you have brought up in your letter.) 5. Variance application base fee of S175.00, after~the“*fact application fee $175.00, total fee $350.00. If the five items noted above are submitted to us by noon on Friday, April 27th, your application could be submitted to the Planning Commission on May 21st, with possible final Council action on June 11th. Please contact me at 473-7357 if you wish to discuss any of the above. Sincerely, • Michael ?. Gaff Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/tln Enclosure - Hardcover Drawing & Calculations cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator Lyle Oman, Senior Building Inspector u CITY of ORONO cmr Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay. Minnesota 65323• Municipal Offica ‘ OF QROnO On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka March 30, 1990 Richard Anderson 3205 Crystal Bay Road P.O. Box 135 Minnetonka Beach, MN #15o 55361 Re; Building Permit/Variance Request Dear Mr. Anderson: Thank you for your attention to starting the process obtaining building permits for the existing deck (after-the-fact; and additional work you propose. Lyle and I visited the site on March 30th and scrutinized your hardcover, enabling me to draw the attached hardcover map. Your property is definitely in excess of the hardcover allowance, and, as we had previously discussed, a hardcover variance for the exist, ng deck and proposed additional work appears necessary. In your letter, you suggest that you will be "reworking" various portions of the property to help the drainage problem. I would note that many of the areas you propose to rework are currently hardcovered by virtue of containing rock or gravel oyer clastic sheet.ing. It *is likely that any Planning Commission recommendation for approval of the existing deck and proposed screen porch and sun room, would be in exchange for some serious removals of existing hardcover to reduce your overall percentage. You mention that erosion is a prime concern because of so much water flowing past your house. This severe runoff is only made worse by all the existing hard surface on the property, which decreases the area where runoff can soak into the ground. A reduction of hard surface coupled with some terracing and site regrading, could alleviate many of the problems. In order for us to proceed with the variance application, you must provide the following; 1. Certified property owners list of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from the Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603 Govt Center, 348-3271). Bt ILDINC A ZONING - 473-7357 ASSE^ING ADMINKTR^TION JL HNANCE - 473-7J5B lAX -473J»5I0 in III If -473-7359 I J g,PJ.ANDERSON DESIGN SERVICES: PLANNINC/CRAPHICST •ir ^ -Landscape Planning & Design ‘Deck Design •Porch & Sunspace Design •Pool Layout Studio Mailing Address: Postal Box 5264 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343 (612) 931-9992 F/HcBimdD LETTER April 25, 1990 Rich & Leesa Anderson 3205 Crystal Bay Road Orono, MN 55391 Dear Rich and Leesa, This is to confirm our arrangements for my landscape design services. After site measurement, I will be laying out your property to begin the landscape master plan. I should be able to have schematic designs ready to review with you sometime around the first week of May. If those meet your approval, we should submit the concepts to the City of Orono for approval Once that is accomplished, final design layout will take about two weeks or so. Thanks again and looking forward to working with you. TA/kwa CITY OF ORONO CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66 •Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 •Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka May 25T^90 Richard Anderson 3205 Crystal Bay Road P.O. Box 135 Minnetonka Beach, MN 55361 Dear Mr. Anderson: This letter is to follow-up our discussions on May 25, 1990 regarding your proposetr landscape plan and additions. As we discussed, the decrease in hardcover would appear to be a positive improvement to the property. In order to make your variance application complete, the following additional items must be submitted: 1. Preliminary plans and elevation views of the proposed porch, screened porch and deck additions. 2. Certifie property owners list of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from the Hennepin County Department of Fi’'ance, A-603 Government Center, 348-3271). # 3. Plat map (obtained with the property owners list). 4. Variance application base fee of $175.00, after-the-fact application fee of $175.00, total fee of $350.00. • Pleare submit the above items to us by noon on Friday, June 22, 1990. Your application would then be scheduled for the July 16t Planning Commission meeting, with Council action scheduled for August 6th. Please contact me at 473-7357 if you have any questions. Michael P.xSS^fron Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator cc: Jeanne Mabusth, Building s Zoning Administrator Lyle Oman, Senior Building Inspector MPG/lsv BLILOING a ZONING - 473-7357 assj:&sing ADMIN *S77t\TION A HN*lN< K - 473-735* -47341510 PI HI IC WORKN - 473-7359 ary OF QRONOy May 25, 1990 CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323•MunidpaJ Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka #1565 Richard Anderson 3205 Crystal Bay Road P.O. Box 135 Minnetonka Beach, MN 55361 rear Mr. Anderson: This letter is to follow-up our ® dilcussed,^ the decrease in hardcover you? positive improvement to the property. In order to Alliance application complete, the following additional items must be submitted: 1. Preliminary plans and elevation views of the proposed porch, screened porch and deck additions. 2. certified property owners list of owners within 150- (you must obtain this list from the Hennepin bounty Department of Finance, A-603 Government Center, 348-3271). 3. Plat map (obtained with the property owners list). 4. Variance application base fee of S1J5.00, after-the-fact application fee of S175.00, total fee of S350.00. Please submit the above items to us by noon 1990. Your application would then be scheduled for i„z Planning Coimiission meeting, with Council action h=hed>Ued tor August 6th. Please contact me at 473-7357 if you have any questions. Sincerel Michael P.^j^ffron Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator cc: Jeanne Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Lyle Oman, Senior Building Inspector MPG/lsv BUILOING A ZONING - 473-7357 ASSESSING ADMlNISl RATION A HVSNCE - 473-735* | A.\ - 473-OMU PI Bl IC WORKS - 473-7J59 C.-iH'B'h ss. 7- I -SS. 2_ - I - 2>'9 •7 -/O - ~/-Zc> - 7 •^^ '3=7 2rZ.'.-'o Z-^.O ■3;-2.0-’70 ^ -> V 5^.T\ /4 ^-v4>^T7-vt.T-- C3r.i-*TT^.« /:Z“^ / v-i^'. :/:o:^.z, -'r\f) n Su;uo/t^C» rir^--r ^ ^ ^ . ^ ^2 "7 ■/ ,5^ ?S^ i/Zi^ • /‘—ir’O? ^ ,//*J ^ • t ^ AjV^. % • • % ^ 15-i * V I t V V t \( K t<i •i I ~ c/-t4«-70/0 /:i-:y.''-’^ ''^7'(7/3___;; '1-!^ ‘a-^ P V: ^ '*'^V yS^ ^ 's.t' . •.»** ^^i^vL. ' ' .5^, i'jo'pz'z j i:f^i'(c. 'l’"'Lc_ V'^•^ '•- /.fP 1 f Zi~( ->“" L^rrtA — C-^{ O-cJ’T L f —^<c '=,"o> - {-^( z • »'*:^ :-< •------ 7D r ; ^ • -v* "' . I ^ V/-./-^‘-h J -h:' .//• •-.. t-/.-.* u ^ ',• »^<3t» 9 0 \p : I T j* RUN DATE 06/16/90 BATCH OOS PROP ADDR OHNER NAHT TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAHE TA)0’AYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODFi PROP ADDR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 1•' HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0HNER3 LIST 58 17-117-25 41 0008 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED R I J BERSIE ROBERT 0 BERSIE 5159 NORTHVIEH RD HAYZATA HN 55591 58 17-117-25 41 0011 05205 CRYSTAL BAY RD R A ANDERSON A L K ANDERSON RICHARD ANDERSON BOX 155 HINNETONKA BEACH HN 55561 58 17-117-25 41 0055 EON STEARNS DONNA HUNTSBERGER 5128 OLD COUNTRY RD HAYZATA HN 82 16-117-25 52 0014 00082 ADDRESS UNASSIGNtO RICHARD A A LEESA K ANDERSON RICHARD A A LEESA K ANDERSON 5205 CRYSTAL BAY RD BOX 155 HINNETOMCA BEACH HN 55561 TOTAL BATCH 005 O0012 58 17-117-25 41 0009 05255 CRYSTAL BAY RD DUl^AYNE L SCHIBILLA AND HIFE DUHAYNE L SCHIBILLA 5255 CRYSTAL BAY RD HAYZATA MN 55591 58 17-117-25 41 0012 05255 CRYSTAL BAY RD C HILLIAM NOLFE At4D HIFE C HILLIAM HOLFE 5255 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD HAYZATA m 55591 82 16-117-25 52 0012 05150 NORTHVIEH RD G A J ANDERSON GERALD R ANDERSON 5150 fiORTHVlEH RD HAYZATA MN 55591 82 16-117-25 52 0054 00082 ADDRESS UrMSSIGtJED RICHARD A I LEESA K ANDERSON RICHARD ANDERSON BOX 155 MimET0F6CA BEACH m 55561 REPORT NO. PI455401 PAGE 4 58 17-117-25 41 0010 05215 CRYSTAL BAY RD TAJ SCHUPP TIMOTHY R A JEANETTE SCHUPP 5215 CRYSTAL BAY RD HAYZATA MN 55591 78 17-117-25 41 0014 05265 CRYSTAL BAY RD LEROY J ERGER A HIFE LEROY J ERGER 5265 CRYSTAL DAY RD HAYZATA MN 55591 82 16-117-25 52 0015 05156 NORTHVIEH RD EDYTHE BROHN HISEL EDYTHE BROHN HISEL 5156 NORTHVIEH RD HAYZATA MT4 55591 82 16-117-25 52 0060 05159 rX)RTHVIEH RD RAJ BERSIE ROBERT D BERSIE 5159 NORTHVIEH RD HAYZATA m 55591 565 ! Cv \VAC ooc HO n*09W \ (41 /7 V / - .fm -'-'>■”1**0 Hi 12) 11. \ <>!- 2(13) .\ •>/ \ i M)tt I • tCAMAMCCICNl lots 45. y. S8. », to. n 4 Ti •Aii4a*s 4oonif>« to t>< Vlu*r.£ or w|*#€iCf«A 0MO<. : \^r .’1 . r - . v; i • >4^ V;/ / 4^ ^19.1 \r* _ m lOt V • \ (10) (51) 3 ^ w‘ i/-‘ W -V^ A • ) VAC COC NO 4S9r7iO ^ ’ia 1 (29) ...li.Is (< (41) ■fOTI!M-SV3 6 52) (63) '1 (40) T30) (32)(34)(33) \ (38) .All 9 loi n (66) X -('fx/?> 'jK ‘,r r / \ ,Q .( ^ 3 ' ^ y 1 or CUfStAi bat 10 (AtHAi imOIO i9*«) ^ <y.W:y \W P . .\ I .'M '> j,?/l)\ \ y ' * I ■ - ■ -*^•3 \ YV .C*\ « » . K" ^ 'TV'n \f M = \ II » to » (24)" (M)" •r. A: I tp, (^f (D » 6 (« >C to 6 19) 5 a (56) 3 V (15) ' ■» A •. \ \ ft .». '» HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practic enforcement of zoning regulations; Lpr/\ Sb ) A.U AO 1 difficulty resulting from strict Sill. Ul. C. VJ. ^kJ) /?it DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusua.. property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2. 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application^ please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 5. 6. 7. 8. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A NORKING COPY (ll* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above Inforaation has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator# agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application# and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct.to/the best of his/her knowledge. , Applicant's Signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff# consultants# agents# Commission members# and C^ncil members for purposes of investiga tion and verification 0t revest. Owner's Signature Date n^ko Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting# please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. i CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application #15 i fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 6<:) Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) CT7Y rin-r-iin Z') ff’c ncr 7rr .W»/VtVV'\.<VV 01 CFfi T“'*' ..'t..........yev' « fuU U VVl MVi. VU.' Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT ^ Name Phone (home)^-^1 —) j/<r Phone (work) v\^VC' <?-7 ,, <Address:Co.<:C*.(•j''i' .1 -' '_• City:1 \•••• M __ zip:: j OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) » 0‘Phone (work) Address:City:s Zip: Date Proper^ Acquired I (do) (fdo no1') also own the adjacent parcels of landA' I (month/year) PRESENT USB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Uce of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimared Construction Cost $____- - - - - Describe request in VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front _ _ Hardcover Side Rear) Other i_ _ _ _ __ Zoning File #1565 July 13, 1990 Page 4 Staff Recoimendation The Planning Commission should address the following issues in any recommendation regarding this after-the-fact variance request and future property improvement proposal; A. Does sufficient justification exist to grant an after- the-fact hardcover and setback variance to allow the existing deck (hardcover Item H) to remain? B. Should a variance be granted to allow the proposed screened porch to be less than 10' from the side lot line? C. In reworking the landscaping of the property, what percentage of hardcover on the property is appropriate? Staff would recommend that applicant be given a specific hardcover perr:entage to maintain, and would recommend that applicant's landscaper submit a revised plan for Planning Commission review at your next meeting, addressing all areas of concerns. Isv / ^ !>■11. u C-h. h ^0 ^ IF 3 1.*'/ ) <'ril ST It I uKiH Zoning File #1565 July 13, 1990 Page 3 The proposed screened porch in the landscape plan is located approximately 6' from the side lot line. A 10' setback would normally be required here, and staff would question whether there is any justification to allow a variance for this location. Staff would recommend that no such variance be granted. Regarding the portion of deck requiring a handrail, raising the grade at the edge of the deck would not be advisable since that would direct more runoff to the neighbors. Cutting the deck back to a point where it is less than 30" above grade would possibly be feasible. Note that any future proposal to put a railing on the deck in any location less than 10' from the lot line, would need a variance. As to hardcover on the property, the proposed landscape plan appears to decrease the intensity of hardcover on the property from the current levels, and could be considered a positive step. The erosion problems noted by applicant in his various letters stem not only from the fact that the house sits slightly downhill from another property to the rear, but are probably increased by the amount of hard surface areas on the property. This attempt to minimize erosion by creating hardcover areas, increases the risk of intensifying erosion in the remaining non-hardcovered areas. The landscape p7‘'n does not specify the use of retaining walls in the rear yard, hence staff would presume that this area is intended to be minimally graded and seeded or sodded to direct drainage around the house. Applicant should be required to provide a grading p'an where changes in grade are proposed. The property does not currently contain a garage, and has access both from Crystal Bay Road at the front and from a privately maintained neighborhood driveway along the railroad tracks at the rear. While applicant has not proposed to construct a garage. Planning Commission may wish to consider where such a structure could be placed in the future and how that would affect hardcover on the property. The gravel parking area along Old Crystal Bay Road certainly is not a situation the City would prefer to continue permanently, given that it acts as a 50' wide curb cut. The second house on the property is not an issue in this application, although it is a uniquely located structure straddling the City boundaries. Applicant has never applied for guest house status of this structure. It does have plumbing. To staff's knowledge, this structure is currently being used as storage,only. Applicant has been advised that use of that residence as a guest house technically requires a conditional use permit from the City of Orono. Staff has not investigated whether similar rules would apply for Minnetonka Beach. Zoning File #1565 July 13, 1990 Page 2 4. This property is partially located within the City of Minnetonka Beach, hence hardcover calculations were based only on the area within the City of Orono. 5. Hardcover on the property prior to construction of the most recent deck area (Item H of the Staff Hardcover Calculation), would have been 42.6% in the 75-250' zone. After deck construction the property as of March 1990 contained 47.3% in the 75-250' zone. Hardcover in the 0-75' zone includes wooden walkway, stairs to the lake, and a gravel parking area, totaling 22.7%. The paved roadway is excluded from the hardcover calculations. 6. Hardcover calculations submitted by the applicant with the application appear to be incomplete, hence for discussion purposes the staff calculations should be used. On the preliminary landscaping plan submitted, applicant's landscape architect has used the staff base numbers and suggests that the following improvements to the property would yield a reduction to 31.7% in the 75-250' zone: a. Reduction in amount of sidewalks in lakeshore yard. b. Reduction in size of concrete patio adjacent to second house on property. c. Replacement of all plastic lined landscape areas with permeable fabric, elimination of rock beds where feasible. d. Reconstruction of rear patio/storage area adjacent to shed, with that area reverting to a non-hardcover status. e. Additional porches and deck amounting to 505 s.f. 7. Applicant should be advised that the City Council currently considers landscape areas lined with plastic orperroeable fabric to be considerad as hardcover. Also, there is some question as to whether the proposed gravel storage area would be considered as hardcover depending on the use of that area, the items stored in that area, and how the area is constructed. Inclusion of that area as hardcover would add abour 480 s.f., resulting in as much as 36.3% hardcover. Discussion ApPjlicant has paid the after-the-fact application fee for the variance request, and has stated his willingness to resolve the hardcover issues on the property in order to go ahead with his proposed landscaping work. TO:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: July 13, 1990 #1565 Richard Anderson, 3205 Crystal Bay Road After-the-Fact Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IC, Single family lakeshore residential, 1/2 acre, sewered Application - Request for after-the-fact hardcover variance for constructed deck and proposed future porches and decks List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey with Staff Sketches of Existing Hardcover Staff Hardcover Calculations & Sketch Applicant Submitted Hardcover Calculation Proposed Site Plan/Landscaping Plan Documentation Regarding After-the-Fact Deck Pertinent Facts - 1.In 1988, applicant constructed a deck to the side and front of his house, such deck being approximately 2.5' to 3' from the side lot line. Most of this is considered as a grade level deck by definition, no higher than the main ground floor level of the house and not requiring a handrail. Per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (C), such a deck is; allowed to be constructed as near as 2' from any lot line. A portion of this deck (the northerly 12' along the. lot line) exceeds 30" above grade, wouId require a railing, and wouldneed to meet the 10' minimum setback. The deck also constitutes additional hardcover. The deck was constructed without a building per.nit. 2.On July 1, 1988, the applicant was advised that a hardcover variance application would be required, since the 75-250' hardcover by applicant's calculations, exceeded the 25% limit. Additional information was requested for review rt that time. 3,Applicant was sent additional notices after not responding to ,the variance notice, and eventually was issued a violation citation in July 1989. The applicant paid a $55.00 fine but failed to complete submittal of the required variance application until June 1990. r CITY OF ORONO P. O. Box C6 Crystal Bay# MM 473-7357 ZONING FILE 11565 55323 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice: 07/20/90 TO;Richard Anderson 3205 Crystal Bay Road Wayzatar MM 55391 COPIES TO: TYPE OF APPLICATION; Variance DATE OF IffiETING: July 16, 1990 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against Planning Commission recommends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS Planning Commission tabled the variance request pending submittal of additional information: a) Provide more detail on the future additions proposed (porch and screen porch). If that detail is not available at this time, it seems likely that Planning Commission will not grant a hardcover variance for those items now, and you will have to app'y for another hardcover variance at the future times those additions are to be built. Provide information to staff regarding grading plans in back yard area. Planning Commission indicated they would likely not look favorably on a setback variance for the deck. Possible options would be to lower the sections in question so they don't need a railing, or cut back the deck to a point where it's no more than 30" above grade. Please contact Mike Gaffron at 473-7357 if you wish to meet to discuss how to proceed. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as Planning Commission on Monday, August 20, 1990; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. Isv • • m ■ m pcv^Sd^ 7^ .^.c-Lu:.<«r ----- .. ^ O O -- C»tysr^ ^i/*V /^ArCi A'f^^A c::^f^ict^o ; -^.r>-7C' - ?fv7^- - .-^* -^7r-£CD'-2«v/c ^ r,, a >• ^ i: /i"; - ^ !q^10\ le-iS/jo^2^ rjTO^'^oo /D,7o / - 3 /^ “ /Oj 1.-'* ’ : r . 2 5^-s 3/0 r.4* 4 ^ 7-5*' 2-T^ y .' . 2^• • . - .»■ -r» • S I ’. .. .* • . . *J.. .‘• •» I . . , T • ^... ,-•• -.• f •;V v*:^:vriV V :.. vr‘^ •'»»i**^* '*»'#T ••* A» •I'f 4 .^r • • T‘ 4' IV** .**4 • **,'.• •* . • • • i • *.' *. • • .• K . V. *.. - * .• • f *. • • S» • • . . • 1* , . \ , .#•• ••■ •.•. ■■• •• V • * *:.• " ••’;• • ;^ > •••:;?;'> ■;: '>*, :■'• <•.* *.••» \ ;•;; • . 4 : • •. t •. •* f *•* 5 ^»r*‘>r*^ J'‘ v***.^^ f >V*»£ .«*< •> H-N-.t’'* y - . •. - • 1,*/ ■ * • ’ *.......................* * * >‘\‘ • ■ • » • • * » i•.*. 4« *>• •* • #y.»; * • *^'. | ^ .»- ■ • •• : '*• • I >• = »V **• **T«: #:o l^A^^coie.^ ^ 3202" o^v^r/iL. /C oAD « ’ - “7V2r " ^/o^Z ‘) I • •Pr^':rr<^'= £/0 *: r . /Soyfrfl^ r )f^ o r?e AJ o //J a?¥Zjit^O //> 4 ^>7/5^^cc*Jf'/^. r *7i '2 CO - /? /t-/ c ■£> £ F /6 <^20 <T <9 ^ •s. *- « 5Hrr> C. ^tOC-bL C.‘iLSC^y/,^T/^ «^»/- LC3 6,>ts> /■ 7. / x-2-S-r '>x)U /»■ 3a Vx a H T T K L |/»\ aJ o . fa s H’-’^SS^ (2S . a >'3'-. Drct V2.V ■>• " '/!.'/* >l-y ^eCve. /i» ^ 2£ . S X s' /VU^ c. 2* ^ 1^, p }oytr C.»^to^ V X/i» C. &Loc5t-* 5u-d {7>^2-D ^ Qo^f'^ c, , iJtotlc 5U-H H* ^ 2A3(i C'20 O® e^\^C 2 ' >* SO r r, U>0£7|>«^ .., , bJ/irCfcwaW V W "*’/• O'— f ,Cmm ^/ //W 4 .y» r 2WS i.( Total Fee: $ CITY OP ORONO - BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date Received: Date Approved: Permit#:Project#: 2. Building Permit Application Requirements: 1. Building permit application - to be filled out completely and signed 2 sets of construction plans to include the following; a) Floor plans; Footing and foundation plan; Elevations (of all sides); Wall sections and cross sections; Details - stairs and any special connections. Certificate of survey with location of existing and proposed structures including hardcover calculations and grading and drainage plans as required. Energy calculations - form provided. Septic report and design if required. b) c) d) e) 3. 4. 5.ABOVE INFORMATION MOST BE SUBMITTED IN PULL BEFORE PLAN REVIEW WILL BE STARTED THE APPLICANT IS: (circle one) r^WNER or CONTRACTOR JC3 SITE ADDRESS:ZIP: 555'-?^ PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NO. _ _ _ _ _ n • NAME OF OWNER ■>, .• (work) PHONE:(home) MAILING ADDRESS ; 1 CITY: ZIP:”.! - • # CONTRACTOR;/Vn r-AA PHONE: :4AILING ADDRESS: ARCHITECT: CITy:ZIP: PHONE: MAILING ADDRESS:CITY;•^TP: TYPE OF WORK: New X Demo_ _ Remodel/Alteration Addition Accessory Stru< Renovate PROPOSED USB (describe in detail): r-/. *»o STORIES SQ. FEET OF BACH FLOOR: HO. OF BEDROOMS:GARAGE STALLS: ATT.DET. ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION VALUATION (excluding land): $ I hereby apply for a building permit and I acknowledge that the information above is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City and with the State Building Code; that I understand this is not a permit and work is not to start without a permit; and that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan. i ■ f / it APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE:DATE: (Please fill’ out the reverse side of this form) / <-UuSS iV >. '' V. uv% M j . §m CITYof ORONO Post Office Box 66 •Crystal Bay, Minnesota SS32.1«Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka DATA PRIVACY. ARyXSPRX In accordance with M.S. 15.165, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or licpnse requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under M.S. 15.165 to review private data on yourself. L, •. ' V ■> « • •* ». ' '. CITY of ORONO Post Office Bo* <■'<>• Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323* Municipal Office On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka June 14, 1988 P.lchard Anderson 3205 Crystal Bay Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Re: Deck Construction at 3205 Crystal Bay Road Dear Mr. Anderson: It has come to our attention of this department that you have constructed a deck at 3205 Crystal Bay Road without a building permit. Please fill out and return the enclosed application with 2 sets of plans, the deck shown on a survey and the hardcover calc's completed. Deck construction without a permit is in violation if Uniform Building Code Section 301(2) and the Orono Municipal Code. The permit must be applied for before 7-22-88 or the City may issue citations. If you have any questions or a problem meeting this deadline please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Lyle Oman, Field Inspector Enclosure: Building Permit Application cc: Thomas Jacobs, Senior Building Inspector Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building S Zoning Administrator Mike Gaffron, Planinng S Zoning Administrator Scott Richter, City Attorney BUILDINO* ZONING - 473-7357 • ASSESSING administration k FINANCE - 473-7358 Pl DLIC"OKKS - 473 735 > HARDCOVER CALCULATION WO SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0- ExISTING Hardcover in Zone Xa. House LENGTHn B. Garage c. D riveway [L 0. % •—> ■5 V mldP UJc2£) v?.n E. Patio / D eck ^ \j5li)<? F. Landscape areas UNDERLAIN ?Iast .c' • sheeting G. Other widtha4' V 4\ n ^4 ^5 . X - X Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone B 3 er45, S I7_ 312^ 1^.4 4s; 344 S.F. S.P. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. _ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. Sll.So S.F.B X 100 g%:0/Vo LW ‘>^T Uac Im^ pv^pt/SC(i,‘iwnnssvA \ r i-I. f •• To:Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson /o Prom:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:August 16, 1989 Subject: #1572 Guenther & Gertrud Noelting, 1060 Tonkawa Road Variances - Public Hearing List of Exhibits Ei.hibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G - Application - Property Owners List - Plat Map - Survey - Resolution Approving Conditional Use Permit/ Variances Application #1131 - Section, Plan, Photo (existing dock section) - Detail on Section Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 - Conditional use permit required for specific excavation work. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Variance approval required for excavations and structure (tie phase within bank) proposed within 75' of the shoreline. Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 and 9(A)5 - Excavation or structures within 75* of the lake are not permitted except for seasonal docks. Review of Previous Application - Application #1131 was approved by Council in May 1987. The conditional use permit and variance application allowed the applicant to install a permanent dock section approximately 20'xll'6" cantilevered over the lakeshore supported by 3-24* length ties to be installed within the lakeshore bank. The applicants chose this method as a permanent dock with pilings installed in 1984 was completely destroyed with the ice break of 1986. Refer to Exhibit D, unfortunately, the dock section was installed over the lot line of the adjacent property to the south. The owner has asked the Noeltings to remove the dock so that it conforms to all required setbacks. The current application involves the Noeltings request to install a new dock that now meets all required setbacks from the extension of the side lot lines. Note that the permanent dock section has been reduced to 6'xl2' no longer requiring a variance to the LMCD code, whereby a dock may exceed 6' excluding posts in either its length or width, but not both. Zoning File #1572 August 16, 1990 Page 2 of 2 The current amended application does require approval of the above referenced pertinent ordinances. In reviewing the existing dock section, staff's only comment would be that we would strongly recommend that the permanent dock section be installed such that the support beams be installed at a lower elevation within the lakeshore bank so that it appears to be a dock section rather than a deck section. Technically, because of the dimensions now proposed by the applicants, this structure can now be classified as a dock section. Once again, in the process of installing new access stairs, such stairs must be liriited to the allowed 4* width. Options of Action - If approved. Planning Commission members may adopt the pertinent findings and conditions set forth in the approval resolution of 1987 (Exhibit E). If denied, please refer to the necessary findings in the conditional use permit and variance sections of your zoning code. i CITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND USB APPLIQ^Bn S [y cy //■I' PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 1 DAD Tnnlfava RnaH Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) i8-nF.-i i l-Qi. .2—.-r-y n.c nfOM) cvki^siru nccjrc i \ •Vr‘.V;^WVi Please attach legal description to application if not included oi on required survey. APPLICANT (home)k/ It Name Neil Weber Address 5111 Windsor Road Phone (work) City Mound 926-1156 Zip SS~^64 OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Guenther & Gertrud Noelting Address 1060 Tonkava Road_ _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone 471-(122i City Orono Zip 55156 Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee _ _ _ _ $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, .seawall, retaining walls within 75’ of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 ~ $175.00 $ 50.00 ' $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdiv’ision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Appeals Other - see fee schedule FRSSBNT USE OP PROPERW Present Zoning District Present Use of Property R I -ft J.' V''. r R I Residential Other (specify)_ DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: Amend oreviouglv granted conditional use p REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map. ^ \ 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). » . r •» a 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11* X 17" OR SMALLER) POR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. rememl^ that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff t_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct best of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's signature July OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ac)cnowledges and agrees to this application authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City of agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and yerific^Uon/O^his request. Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission *^®®^^”9S are held third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all ®°“®°“^ review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If ^ unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building 6 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 4<U4 UAU 0//^^/90 BATCH 007 PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR PROP ADDR OMIER NAHE TAXPAYER HAME/AODR PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AODR OlOCR NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP ADOR OlOCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AODR Olf«R NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR HENNEHIN CiAA^IY icFii ^iwiLit PROPERTY (M4ERS LIST I 1 f k. SB 0a-117-2S 12 0005 01000 TONKANA RD R J HOFFMAN ETAL RAYMOND J HOFFMAN 1000 TONKANA RD LONQ LAKE m 55354 3S 08-117-23 13 0003 01085 TOMCANA RO L I L GARDNER lANRENCE J GARDNER 1085 TOMCANA RO ORONO MN 55354 38 08-117-23 13 0010 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED MARVIN BORMAN ETAL MARVIN BORMAN 1800 MIDHEST PLAZA MPLS m 55402 38 08-117-23 13 0014 01020 TOMCANA RO DOUGLAS J NILLIAMS DOUGLAS J NILLIAMS 3100 NORHEST CENTER MPLS Ml 55402 38 08-117-23 13 0020 01070 TONKANA RO THOMAS i PATRICIA RYAN THOMAS i PATRICIA RYAN 1040 TOMCANA RO LONG LAKE Ml 55354 38 08-117-23 24 0004 01035 TOMCANA RD 0 P I L A KRUHOEFFER DOUGLAS P KRUHOEFFER 1035 TOMCANA RD LONG LAKE MN 55354 38 08-117-23 13 0001 01045 TONKANA RO HAROLD L CONRAD ETAL JOHN R GABRIELSON 1065 TOMCANA RD LONG LAKE Ml 55354 38 08-117-23 13 0004 01105 TONKANA RD JOHN D MILLER I NIFE JOHN 0 HILLER 5009 UNIVERSITY AVE N MPLS MN 55421 30 08-117-23 13 0011 01080 TONKANA RD MARVIN BORMAN ETAL MARVIN BORMAN 1600 MIDHEST PLAZA MPLS MN 55402 38 08-117-23 13 0015 01030 TONKANA RD MARJORIE F 6ASCH ROBERT H 6ASCH 1030 TONKANA ROAD LONG LAKE Ml 55354 38 08-117-23 24 0002 01015 TOMCANA RD DANIEL C I RUTH M PARTEN DANIEL C I RUTH M PARTEN 1015 TOIACANA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 08-117-23 24 0005 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CARL D A R MARIAN PARTEN CARL OAR MARIAN PARTEN 1025 TONKANA RO LONG LAKE Ml 55356 PAGE 38 08-117-23 13 0002 01075 TOMCANA RD R K ROATH A S C ROATH RODNEY A SUE ROATH 1075 TONKANA RO LONQ LAKE MN 55354 38 08-117-23 13 0009 01120 TONKANA RO J A A BE.«T JOHN 6 A AMC L BENDT 1120 TONKANA RO LONG LAKE Ml 55354 1I 38 08-117-23 13 0013 01040 TOMCANA RO RAJ BAUMAN ROBERT J A JOAN C BAUMAN 1040 TOMCANA ROAD LONG LAKE MN 55354 : 4 \-JK. 38 08-117-23 13 0019 01040 TOMCANA RD GERTRUD E NOELTING GERTRUD E NOELTING 1060 TOMCANA RO LONG LAKE MN 55354 / 1 • 38 08-117-23 24 0003 » 01025 TOMCANA RO C D PARTEN ETAL N/L EST CARL D A R MARIAN PARTEN 1025 TOMCANA RD LONG LAKf MN 55354 TOTAL BATCH 007 00017 . ’-#1... fc.»* k,' *• » ! ^ ^ '. i # rI.:/ RUN DATE 07/E4/90 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 16 BATCH 007 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE All ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROpERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF HY KNOHLEOGE AND BELIEF. inlawDATE SPEARS THIS DATE ^RWERTY TAXATION . * ’ • *• j 1 ■ > / • / \J GOVT LOT 2 GOVT LOT : iTT^.'n'k 'CAHTWHaniW" 1 • I t 9 \ -T.r.-- . City of ORO]NO \ - -H... V ' *I \ - •cT; RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________ A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 AMD SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 9 (B) (3) AND VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 * FILE #1131 WHEREAS, Guenther and Gertrud Noelting (hereinafter *the applicants ”) are the owners of the property located at 1060 Tonkawa Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter ”City ”) and legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Ryanwood, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property ”}; and WHEREAS, the applicants have made application to the City of Orono to permit the installation of a permanent dock per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 9 (B)(3) and variances to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to allow the excavation of the lakeshore to permit the construction of the support/foundation structure. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FT.NDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1131. 2. The property is located in the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The property is approximately 1.00 acre in area. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 20, 1987, and recommended approval of the proposed variances to permit excavation within the lakeshore protected area where none is allowed per Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8, and recommended approval of a conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 9 (B)(3) to allow the installation of a permanent dock based on the following findings: A) The applicants propose no change in existing elevations or drainage. Page 1 of 4 i •* r •.* City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO ---------------------------- B) No permanent hardcover is proposed within the lakeshore protected area. C) The substructure is 5* to 6* below finished ^rade providing adequate area for treatment of surface runoff. D) A permanent dock with pilings had been installed in 1984 and was destroyed within 2 years by the unusual pressure/shifting of the ice along this portion of shoreline on Maxwell Bay. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this pro perty are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demon strable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the installation of a permanent dock will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level o. use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Council hereby grants variances per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to allow the lands within the lakeshore protected area and grants a conditional use permit for the Installation of a permanent dock per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 9 (B)(3), subject to the following conditions: 1. Dock length sections shall not exceed 6 feet in width when extended from bank or constructed over lake area. 2. Access stairs shall not exceed 4 feet in width. 3. Area of excavation to be backfilled with granular/sandy loam soils. The City must approve the type of soils to be used in tilling. Page 2 of 4 m % %\ • * -V :•: v ^ (^; r r V - 41 r City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4. Authori,tles granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owners# but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year Of the date of Council approval# or the special coditions of this resolution will ejcpire on that date (Hay 11# 1988). e 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and condi tions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code# shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein# and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicants have read# understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves# their heirs# successors and assigns# hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 11th day of May# 1987. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Ballin# City Cleric James R. Grabek# Hayor Property 0«mer(s]l Page 3 of 4 To:Planning Conunission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson #// PrcxB:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:August 17, 1990 Subject: #1574 James & Sue Ronald, 2565 Dunwoody Avenue - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-J.C, Single family lakeshore residential, k acre, sewered Application - Request for hardcover and setback variances to construct room addition and pool. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey v Hardcover Calculations by Applicants' Surveyor Staff Hardcover Review Letter to Applicants' 7/6/90 Construction Plans Pertinent Facts - 1.Applicants are proposing to raise the northerly wing of the house approximately 6' to match the floor level elevations which currently are offset, and cantilever approximately 4' closer to the north lot line than the existing wall of the house. Although there will still be an 18' setback to the north lot line, the addition technically is an intensification of hardcover and a further encroachment into the average lakeshore setback. 2.Applicants also propose to construct a pool to be located at ^rade level on the lake side of the house. While the pool is not proposed for immediate construction, applicants were advised by staff to include it in their current proposal. Note that the pool would have to move further south and west to maintain a 10' horizontial setback between the overhanging decks and the pool water surface. This would likely bring the edge of the pool patio to the 75' setback line, resulting in an average lakeshore setback encroachment of 69'. Zoning File #lb74 August 17, 1990 Page 2 of 3 3.Existing hardcover in the 75-250' zone is 37.5%. A 1984 variance to allow the currently existing decks was approved at 29.0% hardcover. However, a review of that application indi . •. that sidewalks and rock beds were not included in the 'culations at that time, since that was around the time when the City was just starting to become more restrictive in enforcement of hardcover regulations. 4.Because pool water surfaces have consistently not been considered as hardcover by the City, the total net increase of hardcover before removals would be about 368 s.f. The applicant has proposed removals of the rockbed underliners, and removal of a small front walk, for total removals of 927 s.f. Therefore, once the pool is constructed and the removals are completed, there should be a net reduction in hardcover in the 75-250' zone of approximately 559 s.f. or 1.9%, for a final hardcover of 10,430 s.f. or 35.6%. 6.Lot coverage by structures, including the pool and its associated patio, will be 11.4%, well within the 15% limitation. Discussion - The applicants worked with staff to get an early start on some of the interior remodeling work that does not need variances. They were advised to limit such work to that which could stand in the event that the variances weren't approved. The work that is proceeding includes a wall bumpout in the foyer area over existing foundation; addition of basement bath; and moving kitchen cabinets to the basement for use in a "rec room" kitchenette (applicants were advised this could not be used for a guest apartment use without a conditional use permit; they indicate no intent to have a guest apartment). None of the above work is outside the existing footprint or rooflines. The average lakeshore setback variance for the 4' extension towards the side lot line is necessary because the house to the north is relatively far from the lake. The average setback ordinance exists to protect lake views enjoyed by the neighboring property owners. In this case, mature trees along the shared lot line already screen applicants' existing house, and the 4' extension and slight raising of that end of the house, will likely have no impact on lake views enjoyed by that neighbor. Likewise, the impact of the pool on views from either adjacent neighbor will be very minimal, because that pool will be at a relatively low elevation compared to the two neighboring houses. ' __1 Zoning File #1574 August 17, 1990 Page 3 of 3 Regarding hardcover, the 1984 approval at 29.0% did not account for sidewalks, concrete patios, or rockbeds. Today, those items are calculated as hardcover. Applicants propose a net reduction from 37.5% to 35.6%, in association with the pool construction. The pool is intended for some future date, and if not constructed within the one year variance effective period, would have to be renewed. Absent the pool, the proposed house addition is completely over existing rock and plastic hardcover yielding no net increase. The applicants' proposed hardcover removals are the equivalent of the pool itself plus the patio surrounding it. Staff Recommendation - Regarding the average lakeshore setback for the pool and the cantilevered addition, a recommendation for approval would be appropriate if Planning Commission determines that these imp'Tovements will have no impact in reducing views of the lake enjoyed by the neighboring property owners. Regarding the hardcover issue. Planning Commission should determine whether the equivalent removals of rockbed underliners (resulting in a possible net reduction in hardcover on the property) is adequate. Any recommendation for approval should specify to what percentage hardcover should be adhered to in the 75-250' zone. I n ‘ CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 / / ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 7*T" (no change from original application) / / After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) i i »' /•.>. 4 pl nfjrrjn i/t u/iUitu PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address curr nrcrrc I ji;Yrrjtw«» Ui i aul. ? *-‘f > *.V»f*WVV\ A to’w'V—VVV'VV iiVniV J. Vtu ^v=r /ViX / w/ • W / YOU:isz^:i0 cool aoi Tin Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)A7/?i/V / / iiu/ . Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Phone (home) Phone (wor)c) Address ! a'- ^ Citv; ]?/7//Zip; 5^3 OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ryl‘^_^2L^(•> h<J^c\ ' Phone (home) Vy/^'7/^v' <-y'ccf) Phone (worlc) ^3 £>-'//0/_ _ _ Address -c-L^/ ^“^-City: _ _ _Zip; "3^3^/ Date Property Acquired ^Arlc'^rec /??</r (month/year) I (do) also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT OSE OP PROPERTY VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setbac)c Variances ( Other Lot Width Front Side Hardcover Rear) ■ •■ 1 ■■>WtfLfc.<fV. li' Ul - m ■ ~r nf~ r .l ' "Ml.* ' —.■.CjT.j«..k.jru«.iri^r4i. .wb..l«.'U£i * # \I RUN DATE 07/1S/90 BATCH 010 PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR 50 20-117-25 21 0020 02520 DUNHOOOY AVE GALE HILL GALE HILL 2520 OUOIOODY AV NAYZATA HN 55591 PROP ADDR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER . NANE/ADOR :: I •» 36 20-117-23 02560 Dl JIG KAFUS JOHN A NAFUS 2560 DUNHCX)OY NAYZATA HN 21 0024 Y AVE AVENUE 55391 PROP ADDR CRtCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 36 20-117-23 21 0032 02565 DUNNOOOY AVE ERNEST C BLANCHARD ETAL ERNEST C BLANCHARD 2565 DUNNOODY AVE NAYZATA HN 55391 PROP ADDR 0NI4ER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR 36 20-117-23 24 0034 02601 CASCO POINT RO BRUCE J HEDBLOH ET AL BRUCE J HEDBLOH AND CAROL J CLINE-HEDBLOH 2601 CASCO POINT RD NAYZATA HN 55391 s 9 ) HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATICX^ SYSTEM PROPERTY ONNERS LIST 36 20-117-23 21 0021 02540 DUI6I00DY AVE KNUTE J NORGARD ETAL KNUTE J NORGARD 2540 0UrtRX)0Y AVE NAYZATA HT4 55391 38 20-117-23 21 0030 02545 DUNHOOOY AVE DONALD 0 AKINS ET AL NILLIAH HULTGREN 2545 DUr4HOOOY AVE NAYZATA T94 55391 36 20-117-23 22 0016 02525 DUNNOODY AVE J H LEAR I B L LEAR JAMES H LEAR 2525 OUI4HOODY AVE NAYZATA m 55391 TOTAL BATCH 010 00010 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 25 38 20-117-23 21 0023 02560 DUNI'COOY AVE H A KAATZ SNA KAATZ MICHAEL A S NAN A KAATZ 2560 DUrtlOOOY AVE S NAYZATA HN 55391 r-v • • 38 20-117-23 21 0031 02565 DUr4N00DY AVE J B RONALD S S G ROTULD JAMES S SUSAN RONALD 2565 DUrt4000Y AVE NAYZATA HN 55391 •. » i. 38 20-117-23 29 0035 02617 CASCO POINT RO G L MARQUAROT/J H MARQUAROT GARY L > JOAN H HARQUAROT 2617 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA HN 55391 J i I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATlOfI OF INfORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HErSIEPlN C0U4TY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATlONp TO.THE BEST OF MY M40NLECGE AND BELIEF DAT * » » « • ^ V *■ City of ORONO « resolution of the city council NO. _________ 3. Violation of or conditions of this grant°cd "hVrctn'. ’and shall be punishable as a misdeneanor. . Th., ... ■. sianed applicant has read, understood and ^;reby agrees'to the tern.s ““?hereS? ^I^eef tl property Adopted by the City Council on this 15th day of October, 1984 . i '' < -I /; ATT g • • e ^ • f ^ •,..**• e ■s^ir.■:i^ ■ ■ V« t City Clerk <J) Property owner ll::;ciTY ^ 0B-^•.r, MRONa~ City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 168H _________ 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staf f, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on thi3 property are pocu 1 iar to i t and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a coi'-venience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would bo in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Corprohensivc Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the const ruction of a deck which will increase hardcover in the 75-250 ' setback zone f rom 6,898 square feet (or 24% ) to 8,044 square feet or (29*) wher*' only 7,018 sqviare feet (25%) is allowed, subject to the following conditions: 1. The h.irdcovcr allowed by this variance is in excess of th*^ 25p»?rcenr allowed in the 75 — 250 * foot setback zone. The applicant ihe'rel'y advised thiit the City will not approve any future t rprovemont .r that result in additional hardcover, and that if such improvements arc proposed, that they be counterba lanccil with the removal of existing h.i I •'•.'t'Vi'i . 2. Aid iM'f t H'f. «nant.*d by this variance run with the p.r<»p»*i t y not with t h*' .'•pplicant, but are permissive only and pu t • 0X01 c i r.od by .i pp 1 i ca tion for a building pc rm i t within nn* yo.u ot t lu* dato c'f Council approval, or this variance will ••xpi t •• on I h.it «l.it o (Octobo.'' 1 5, 1985 ) . 4942256 mm J 1 ; ' I i' City of ORONO r' ' i.* 3 wmmm-jQsvQKat RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.1 c M A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 - FILE #857 WHEREAS, Jerry Nelson {hereinafter "the applicant ) is owner of the oroperty locates at 25fi5 nunwoody Avenue within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 11, Block 8, Townsitc of Langdon Park, and that part of Lot 12, Block 8, Townsitc of Langdon Park lying northwesterly of a line described as beginning at a point in the northeasterly line of Lot 12 distant 39.5 feet southeast from the most northerly corner of said Lot 12; thence southwesterly parallel with the northwesterly line of Lot 12 a distance of 188 feet; thence deflect right 8 degrees 35 minutes a distance of 147 feet more or less to the shore line and said line thereby terminating; and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal loninq Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the constructior. of a deck which will increase the hardcover in the 75-250 setback zone from 6,898 square feet (or 24«) to 8»J44 square feet (or 29») where only 7,018 square feet (or 25%) is allowed. NOW, THEREFORE BR IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota ; FINDINGS 1. This application war. reviewed as zoning file *857. Th*"* profierty i.s located in the LR-IC Single Family iMikoshoro Rf'n i dont i n 1 r.c'^ninq District. • 1. Th'* Orono riann i no Comm ssion reviewed this application on September 17, 1“H4, and recommended approval of the propos*'d variance ba.r»M| upon the following findings: .») All b.ickr. cd the zoning district will be mot. b> ovT.ill li.w .Kov.'i <^n the property includin«]tho ■p,opoi..-.l.id.!M icn ir. G,8n4 r.f where 1(1,740 sf would be .illowi'd It n.iximum development. • » David Nygren July 6, 1990 Page 2 No permits can be issued until this matter is resolved, either by obtaining a variance or revising plans so that no variance is necessary. Please contact me at 473-7357 if you have any questions. Assistant Pletwning & Zoning Administrator Enclosures: Variance Application Resolution #1688 MPG/lsv I ^ f CITY OF OTIONO CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66 •Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323• Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka July 6, 1990 David Nygren Halek Development 6885 Boudin Street NE Prior Lake, MN 55372 RE: Proposed Construction, 2565 Dunwoody A'/enue Dear Mr. Nygren: The Building and Zoning Department is in receipt of your application for a building permit, which was received by this office on July 5, 1990. A review of the application finds the following: 1. The 4' cantilever addition results in additioi»«a I hardcover on this property which already exceeds the allowed hardcover limit of 25% in the 75-250' zone. A variance was granted in 1984 for 29% hardcover in the 75-250' zone. That 4% variance was granted to allow for decks on the lake side of the hou^e. Another variance must be obtained in order for the current proposal to be approved. 2. The proposed additions/remodeling are located lakeward of the defined average lakeshore setback line, where no above grade encroachment is normally allowed, therefore an average lakeshore setback variance is required. Enclosed is a variance application form for your use should you wish to proceed with a variance request. You would have to provide hardcover calculations and the other required submittals listed within that application, no later than noon on Friday, July 27, 1990, in order to be scheduled for a public hearing before the Planning Commission on August 20th. The earliest final Council approval for this request would be September 10, 1990. BUILDING A ZONING - 47J-7357 ASSESSING ADMI.NISm\T10N A nN.\NCT - 473-7358 lAX - 473-0510 PLBUC WORKS - 473-7359 qjci. fLA'vnc, to. 2,9,2_a>o - 37.srX /ri 2^^ =IZ.C /3^ - P / 2. •: .*-. ^ /M 73--2C:>' — 2>® In^, + yo/2 •*- 6?*/^ “/-^/70 i.-^. •: :-r c < / f^Po2c^^ ; »“ /6?0 - r. Atr^.'TL <^vfci ep</sryn^_^ (^/Oo <2>0 t-'/jATfc5<2_ ' S’f g-a./" io >>/'«. i^Je^-noz. ' ^So fATjoz oxii-'i ■=S’&o-s‘/2- = SC.S •% W /^.C ► -• • • PoiS.' /OoTTi^ P»<^V-'<-^i/4vrtc /77" fTLOAJT t^JAn<. HH ev ; /7S“*+- 207 /ve>/7C^ •= S3E 9z?s^. (0^ b°\ - " /O/V io/ 2<12-ftO ' 3r. (a '/i I r . . —p^ - 2, SO s^'^'S' X ^o d> 2-<\ ^ 3 2- © jU X/&.S ® ,2s-.V;c 33 0 33 X /'^/!■;<» 'pe-ct: la^s3. © © © 0 L>/2^'V©//,t:7 ^ / 2. X /a 3 v3 V^ x/6» •■/,r2<yz Vr^-V ;ox///v<i ,' V2-7 ® /Jx£?/: / 7. 7 V 7© .©^ (5» /^ = '?76» \ * 92-8 = S33 ' <^^7 / / /-0<3 \[^c/ t \us» /^ <^7 4^0 /JO / t 0 / //V7 /9r ^23 // '©ST7 v« /i_- S7/ ........©i r £_ ^■/■' 2_- /I? .........©^'xC/z.' ‘TS (3 KI.xyo/T. ______= 2s^ ......4©' 32^" -.. S)/Cfi yz^ ......................- 3 20 Cx:z9 _____ .. —/yr 0 1,-c^/s^’ 36^ , 0 /wy/2 _ ' / S-2 ^yz.'^....................- 87 .. €>i/-Uf ^ ^ f ^- Uo 263S //7 J ‘ / />»\ f oi/o • • • r V ‘.CO'.'. 'r oO .' « To: From Date: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator August 16, 1990 Subject: #1575 Judson M. Dayton, 1111 Tamarack Drive - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.28, Subdivision 3 - Conditional use permit required for a preschool/kindergarten for Waldorf Day- School . List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit A-1 Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - Exhibit K - Application - Applicant's Addendum Property Owners List Plat Map Survey Existing Floor Plan Proposed Plan for Pre-school/Kindergarten Elevations East/West Proposed Calendar 1991 Schedule Information on Waldorf School Curriculum Articles on Waldorf Method/Approach to Education Review of Application - The applicant, Judd Dayton, seeks a conditional use permit for a pre-school/kindergarten program consisting of approximately 12 to 15 students with 2 full-time instructors. The school will operate Monday through Friday in the mornings fc 2% hour sessions. The location of the pre-school will be in an existing residential structure located on Lot 1, Block 1, Underhill Farms. Access to the site is via a long, platted corridor off of Tamarack Drive. Please review the proposed floor plan (Exhibit F). The applicant proposes no interior remodeling for classroom use. Two teachers will park within the attached garage providing open parking and turnaround area for the drop off of students. The existing pool on the site will be altered providing a permanent deck covering over the existing water surface and a sump pump to remove all drainage that collects beneath the deck covering. All alterations are subject to the requirement of the building code. Zoning File #1575 August 16, 1990 Page 2 of 3 As already noted in an earlier review involving a conditional use permit for a pre-school use (Trinity Pre-school), the State licensing will not require an outdoor play area as classes will not extend beyond three hours. This specific property is isolated and several feet from a public roadway. The lot is located within an established rural, 2 acre, residential neighborhood. It may be appropriate that applicant provide a fenced or secured area for play so as not to impact the existing residential neighborhood. This request may not be so much for safety, although this certainly is an issue for the applicant, but rather for the protection/preservation of the rural residential neighborhood. It should also be noted that the City has not received negative comments from the neighbors notified of this public hearing. As the total number of participants in the pre-school program is under 28, there is no need to address the needs for a fire suppression system. Applicant should be advised that if the pre-school program exceeds the total 28 level, that a fire suppression system will be required. In fact any increases or changes in hours of pre-school/kindergarten proposed will require a new conditional use permit. For example, if classes were to be expanded beyond 3 hours or if student and teacher enrollment were to expand beyond the 28 participant level. Options of Action - Denial. If denied, please refer to the necessary findings in the conditional use permit sections of your code. Approval. If approved, the following recommendation with findings and conditions may be considered: To grant approval of a conditional use permit for the Waldorf Pre-school/Kindergarten to be located at 1111 Tamarack Drive for applicant, Judson Dayton, finding all pertinent sections of the code have been satisfied by the applicant. Such approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to opening: A) The Orono Building Inspector shall review the facility to determine need for interior signage for "fire exits" in cases of emergencies. The Building Inspector shall evaluate the building to determine if there is a need for any other improvement prior to use by young children. Zoning File #1575 August 16r 1990 Page 3 of 3 B) Existing pool to be covered with permanent wooden deck covering and appropriate methods for relieving surface runoff that collects within base of pool. 2. Planning Commission to make a recommendation concerning fenced/defined outdoor play area for students. Applicant should be asked to comment on this issue. ■ T^.r *-idV J • • CITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLI PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address III/ T)R\\f£- \;.» • viJ*- - OQOtOD Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 0i(o / j OOC> 7 Please attach le^al description to application if not included on required survey. LOT ____ APPLICANT Phone (home) HU - 7H0 Name >SofKM DAyTVrj Address F^J:a>c fh/.'jf Phone (work) ______ City \x)p!i2ptTP Zip -SS3^L ONNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Address Phone City Zip Date Pro I (do) ooerty Acquired _ _ _ _’^Isol'jo_ _ _ _ _ _ _(month {do noQ also own the Adjacent parcels of land. (month/year) FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee - After-the-Fact Fee - Cwible Current Application Fee $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _ _ $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule 0TB APPLICATIONS _ _ _ $200.00 $250.00 " $175.00 $ 50.00 _ _ _ $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Appeals Other - see fee schedule Judson M. Dayton TCF Tbwer. Suite 860 121 South Eighth Street Minneapolis. Minnesota 53402 July 26, 1990 f :/ -----------y .1 IT ■ ‘fu City of Orono P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed please find a completed conditional use permit for 1111 Tamarack Drive, Orono. We propose to run a Waldorf Pre-School and Klndergarden on site. Currently we are estimating roughly twelve to fifteen total students with two teachers, one for pre-school and one for klndergarden. Enclosed with the application is background information on Waldorf education and a school year calendar. Currently there is a swimming pool at 1111 Tamarack. We plan to drain it completely and Install a sump pump or other suitable device to remove any runoff that accumulates in the pool. We also plan to build a permanent, strong and safe deck over the entire pool. Our contractor has recently done other work in Orono and will work closely with your inspector in order to surpass any requirements the city has. We are even more concerned about safety and upkeep than you. The structure at 1111 Tamarack has a two-car garage where the teachers will park. There is ample room for children drop-off in front of the house. Several of the families involved in the school have more than one child attending so the number of cars dropping off children, especially with some car pooling, should be very small — six to eight cars. On days when additional parking is required, we plan to park parallel to the long straight driveway. There is ample flat smooth cut grass to park on along the driveway, all fenced in. Also enclosed with the application is a current structure layout and a proposed school layout. No food service will be provided, children will bring their o%m snacks each day. City of Orono July 26, 1990 Page 2 *mm. * ' •• V♦ —• ••• All licensing with county and state organizations is in process. I hope I have answered most of your questions. In talking to most of the neighbors, all are extremely excited about Waldorf. Some want more information and may send their children. We think we are bringing a sound, wonderful educational program to Orono Sincerely /I/ / / "> / {5^ Judson M. Dayton Enclosures I RUN DATE 07/19/90 BATCH 001 PROP ADDR OKNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OI^R NAfC TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR HENNEPIN CCHJNfY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERIY ONNERS LIST 38 26-110-23 51 0002 00038 ADDRESS UTMSSIGNEO DUNCAN N DAYTOT4 DUNCAN N DAY 1044 630 INDIAN HOUND NAYZATA MN 55391 38 26-118-23 31 0008 01099 TAMARACK DR STANLEY B GREGORY STANLEY B GREGORY 1099 TAMARACK DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26^118-23 51 0011 01075 KNOLL MANOR RD 0 D CLEVELAND I K CLEVELAND GEORGE I KATHLEEN CLEVELAT40 1075 KNOLL MANOR RO LONG LAKE MT4 55356 36 26-118-23 31 0019 01090 KNOLL MANOR RD SHAVER CORP OF NAYZATA JOHN F A LAUREL H ALLE4BURG 1090 KNOLL MA440R RO LONG LAKE MT4 55356 TOTAL BATCH 001 00012 38 26-118-23 31 0009 01300 SIXTH AVE N J0nr4 R SHEEHAN ETAL JOHN R SHEEHAN 1300-6TH AVE NO LUtJG LAKE MI4 55356 38 26-118-23 31 0009 01065 TAMARACK DR SSL rFTERS0f4 STEPHEN C PETERS044 1065 TAMARACK DR L0T4G LAKE »f4 55356 38 26-118-23 31 0012 01100 KT40LL MAT40R RD D E KINGMAN S R R KlfTGMAN D E KINGMAT4 S R R KIT4GMAN 2956 HUMBOLDT AVE S MPLS Tt4 55905 38 26-118-23 92 0009 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIG44ED CONLEY BROOKS CONLEY BROOKS 510 BAKER BLOG ttPLS m 55902 REPORT NO. P1955401 PAGE 1 38 26-118-23 31 0007 01111 TAMARACK DR JOHN D ALBERS JOHN ALBERS 1111 TAMARACK OR LONG LAKE MN 55356 r 38 26-118-23 31 0010 01330 SIXTH AVE N N E BOHACH A S BOHACH NALLACE E A SUSAN BOHACH 1330 COUNTY RD 6 LONG LAKE MN 55356 )0 38 26-118-23 31 0013 01080 KNOLL MANOR RD LOUISE B PLANK LOUISE B PLANK PO BOX 687 NAYZATA MN 55S91 38 26-118-23 92 0005 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CONLEY BROOKS CONLEY BROOKS 510 BAKER BLDG MPLS rt4 55902 • I • ■ a rtm <1 RUN DATE 07/19/90 BATCH 001 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INfORHATION SYSTEM PROPERFY OHNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI93540I PAGE 2 • "ST I 10 1 7 •' r.-5 =fe 1 CERtlFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORTUTION AS IT APP’iARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HErtTEPlN COUrUY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION^ TO THE BEST XV.OF IfY KNOI^UDGE AIIO BELIEF DATE C V ( V. 1 I t /. I 1 d =|:tr 1 \ i — »: •* >! \{ / •' i lu • * '4. BXl%TJi06- fl£>Ofi. \ A ( i • •• • m J-. >«« — a J. •. . i rWILY flcppcpM •• M '”*’ • •- '''y*'-! a» ^' • - I •• •r:•r-*-^_i ^ T. ••• • •••• •• •tf-o* 5' • • 4.* •A-,1c.»». - ________!*■ i‘ 1^.. ^--------- ‘f J ''MAST«?SEt»00»^ Vf ^ OIMHO WA. . •- I” • • / I 7 13-*— -w--. .9 n - - ■- ..- •.: L -r WTCHEN •. aT Ol.il I&^ • ** . ' ^ • • • « •* 1 ^ * 1 •: \ 4/ -f', 1 •■.’ ■,;■•!, -i' 1.1 M ■•i- ' - r i .I f* ** ! V N I ** ' I- ' H ^ IIIJ* ■ . •-* I • * > ’I •• •«« • \^ft ‘ • ? ,i‘c :* - ■ ----------tmf 9 ^*.riu !r r /I f • • I • • ' ! f —. • V j , /j • '’•^1 tS04 . ' ' ••V is /a ^ri '' ■ ■ •• :■ '--: . l4rnl 9C«ira • !' i ’ '• /i ■• __________ •1• ^ r UVIH6 #?OOM . t f k. u«r t4s"iLF\AT.ON 1/4 "./’-o- Ir ' . ». • .S.WC. kiMf —r‘ T • ji. I T i •I' —- V . . t»• Ifc . ' f ■' 'I', 4 i. ' Vm. .^iW. . J 111 h 1 !• 06 4'C»U'>9 3 «Ir l*i 6*«»6«| •• •_j :_______r * rr- TT €7r3r '.»#ir — t I------ g if»•%• ♦ • ••* I I \\ : *»W ^L~\'a. JL d slJ) • ____ SPRING HILL WALDORF SCHOOL Calendar 1990/91 School Year -- - - TO .. . r-o* 4 '.t • ■ « <• T i>. i Sept. 4 (Tues) Sept. 28 (Fri) Oct. 18-19 (Thu & Fri) Oct- 31 (Wed) Nov. 11 (Sun) First Day of School MICHAELMAS FALL FESTIVAL Teachers' Conference (No School) Halloween (in-class celebration) Martinmas (in-class celebration Fri Nov. 9) Nov. 22-23 (Thu & Fri) Thanksgiving (in-class celebration Wed Nov. 21) ADVENT GARDENDec. 2 (Sun) Dec. 6 (Thu) Dec. 21 (Fri) Dec. 24-Jan 4 Jan. 7 (Mon) Feb. 2 (Sat) Feb. 14 (Thu) Feb. 18-22 (Mon-Fri) Mar. 28 (Thu) Mar. 29-April 5 (Fri-Fri) Spring Break (No School) St. Nicholas Day (in-class celebration) WINTER FESTIVAL Winter Break (No School) School Resumes Candlemas (in-class celebration Fri Feb. 1) Valentine's Day (in-class celebration) Teachers' Conference (No School) SPRING FESTIVAL April 8 (Mon) May 1 (Wod) May 19 (sun) May 27 (Mon) June 7 (Fri) School Resumes May Day Whitsunday Memorial Day (No School) SUMMER FESTIVAL (Last day of school) L'- V '*• • t • •• - VMLDORF CITY SCHOOL 927-0506 THE WALDO/ APPROACH TO EDUCATION Rene M. Querido Our educational methods today are very deeply influenced by the picture of Rian that we carry in our minds. Some views attempt to convince us that the human being is hardly more than an animal; others deal with the child as if he were merely a highly sophisticated machine. Waldorf education stresses the dignity a’td individuality of the growing child. Through Rudolf Steiner's impulse, ed'.cation becomes art, the curriculum being adapted to the various phases of the growing child's development from kindergarten to high school. Practice ir.. the classroom is based on the con<- viction that a truly wholistic pedagogy should encompass the education of hea^, hand and mind. The children in a Waldorf school are led during the seven or eight years of elementary educ.'tion hy Uhe same class teacher who brings to them the wonders of nature, which late., develop into the sciences, and the achievements of humanity through the march of time, which nourish and stimulate the unfolding of consciousness in the awakening human being. Other teachers help in this process: music, eurythmy, handwork, gymnastics, foreign languages, etc. are taught from the early years; later woodwork, gardening, etc. are added. In the high school, specialists - through a balanced curriculum of the sciences and the humanities - bring to the students in a lively way a deeply integrating experience of the personality. In the years following puberty, the unfolding of true freedom on the basis of responsibility is the goal. In an age of growing specialization, the human being can perhaps only survive if in childhood the dormant forces of the fullness of his individuality have been awakened. The many Waldorf schools - some 175 to-date* - all over the free world have arisen out of the burning needs of parents who harbor a real concern for the future of their children. The Waldorf School Movement was initiated by Rudolf Steiner (1861-1925), a universal humanist and scientist, who gave invaluable indications for the renewal of Rianklnd - not only in education, but also in medicine, agriculture, the arts, and the sciences. The true meaning of education is "to bring forth” rather than ”to put in”. Waldorf education is dedicated tow^Lrds the awakening of the faculties that lie within the child. Over and above preparing the student for life, our hope and concern is to contribute towards the unfolding of young people who out of themselves will find the strength to change what is harmful and unhealthy in our civilization. The true dignity of the human being is at stake. (Article from Program of the Marin Waldorf School Benefit Concert, Spring 1978) *about 350 in 1985. • • • THE MAIN LESSON CURRICULUM Language arts, history, math and science are taught in blocks of 3-5 weeks during the morning main lesson hours, when the children are freshest for academic work. Tiie class teacher, who presents the^ subjects, remains with the same class tliroughout the elementary years, enabling close, secure relationships with each child and an appreciation of individual needs. PRIMARY GRADES 1-3 MIDDLE GRADES 4-6 Pictorial Introduction to tlie alphabet, writing, reading, spelling, poetry and drama. Folk and fairy tales, fables, legends. Old Testament stories. Numbers, basic mathematical processes of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. Nature stories, liousebuikiing, farming and trades. Writing, reading, spelling, grammar, syntax, poetry and drama. Norse sagas, history and stories of ancient civilizations, culminating in Greek and Roman history. Review of the four mathematical processes, fractions (common and decimal), piercentage, geometry. Local and world geography, comparative zoology, botany and elementary physics. UPPER GRADES 7-8 Creative writing, reading, spelling, grammar, poetry and drama. Medieval history. Renaissance. Age of Discovery. American History, biography. Algebra, geometry, business math, graphing, ratio and prof>ortion, number bases. Geography, physics, chemistry, astronomy, physiology, geology and mineralogy. THE SPECIAL SUBJECT CURRICULUM The children are also taught by special subject teachers: classes such as music and foreign languages follow the morning mai. lesson part of the day. In the afternoon the more active classes such as handwork, physical educaUon and dance-movement ar taught. Most special subjects begin In kindergarten, witli appropriate material and skill development for each grade. • Music: vocal, recorder, violin, string and wind ensembles. • Foreign languages: French .& German • Art: watercolor painting, form drawing, becsv.ax and clay modeting, charcoal drawing, perspective, etc. • Handwork: knitting, crocfiet, sewing, toyinaking, woodworking. • Movement: games, eurytfuny, gymnastics, pliyslcal education, sports. (Outline from Shining Mountain Waldorf School brochure, Boulder, Colorado) . i I? essons in Wonder Waldorf schools emphasize what others don't the fairy-tale magic of being a chile. When you walk into one of the kindergarten class rooms. its like entering a fairy-tale wonderland. The walls radiate with peach-toned pastels applied artistically in swirls. The fireplace, skylights, and kitchen nook ail have a storybook look about them. The teacher assembles the children by sweetly singing their names (“.Vj-than!"). then leads them m simple movement acnvndes %vhere they become, for the moment, giants. pLXies. and gnomes. During playtime, the children create fan- i'l •• } ! i•> ■') X >i|^ W' ^p i ^ .K The Wdioff philosopkY m JOum: Learning if jrjwirri no( only thwugh sounJd:uI Sight but abo thnyugh imagination, totuh, moirmmt, jnJ feeiing usy worlds from trer stumps, bnghtlv colored fcarvcs. and homemade dolls shaped to look like hetie elves, fierce dragons, and brave knights This IS a Waldort*classroom, the setnng for one of the most unusual approaches to childhood edu cation in practice todav Created more chan fM) \Tars ago by Rudolf Sieiner. an Austnan philoso pher. the method was riamed ^ironicallv) alter the Waldorf-Astona ogarette factor/ in Stuttgart. Ger many. where, in Dr Steiner developed a school for the emplovces’ children. Currently tnere are a* least -iOO Waidort*schools m 27 counenes throughout the world (including RJO in the United States ’and Canada). Programs range from simple kindergartens to full-scale K-12 faaiicies. Tlte Uaid movement is still small, yet its ^.»hilosoph% t • v”i r’.i;Tr.onv some ot the latest ideas in educaaon For examp e ^aldort teachers share prominent educators ’ mcreasing alarm at uhe ^cndcnc>'m manv schools to push voung children to ieam reading and ot.ner aostract skills betore thev’re ready A recent re port issued joint! V by the Nanonal .\ssociacion for the Education of Young Children and the Nancnal Association of Elementarv School Pnncipals urges preschools to reduce the heavy emphasis on aca demic learning 'X'hiie re- ginning reading is taught at manv preschools. \Xa*uort kindergartners — even the eariv readers among tr.em — leave their books at home. Readmu isn’t intro duced until the end of first grade. “Bv not teaching reading, but instead civuig them puppetry, stones, poems, verses, singir.ii games, movement, and gesture, we’re building a strong inner reservoir that children can later draw upon when thev do Icam to read, savs Ann Pratt, founder ot Piric Hili ^ald<irt Schtx)l in ^Xllton. New' Hampshire, and coordinator ot the .\ntioch- Waldort'teachcr-iraimng center there Hands-On Culture I* eariv reading isn t stressed, .uiturj/ iitcracv is a kev concern thr<'uehout a Waldort program — and here Waldort educators are also in acCi>ru with otiicr experts in their ticid Bcstseilers >ucn as I nr *• T l%i. •>i VI ir« ■•r«i riTf«nnik*ic« •T4illlW 55E35S rimv#ir«M riH^fTirt nviiiTirti / An Idea Ahead of its Time: Steiner’s Visionary Waldorf Schools Recent broin rcseorch shows what Rudolf Steiner, the Austrian philosopher and mystic, knew intuitively: the whole person must he touched by the cducotional process. From tlie very bcKinnint', when Steiner's Waldorf Schools began in Germany in 1919, he turned toward holistic methods, seeking an archetypal intcrcon* necting ground for the teaching nf urt, science and religion. Steiner believed that a sense of individual totality, based on personal free* dom and unpossessive love, could enhance perception. By weaving these into teaching methods, Steiner hoped to create a seminal model of education so powerful that there would soon be no con* tinuing need for the prototype Waldorf Schools. How did these schools differ from others? Primarily in their emphasis on the arts and the inner life. Said Steiner simply: "Waldorf School Education is nnc a pedagogical system but an Art — the Art of awakening what is actually there within Uic human being." Steiner understood the prob lems of our strong inicllectuol bios ^ and of parental expecta tions of success in money, ])owcr ond social adaptation. T' override such repressive pressure^, nc felt on overarching view was neces sary — one that took into a- unt the purpose of man's develop ment Steiner had such a view: he called it Anthropusophy and he stressed the idea of growth and change, believing that u new kind of education could pave the way for man's next evolutionary stage. What mokes Steiner's work valuai>:e today? First of all, it asks the qucalion, "What is a human beirg?" His answer, which includes rcvorcncc for life — os toughl in every class — expressos the true conncctiuns between nature, person ond society. It is dedicated to inner development, to the education of spiritual qunl'ties, ego strength, differentiation, will, thinking, feeling, movement — ond even breathing. For instance, in Steiner's curriculum, science is taught with a concern for human values; rclinion is not the only route to our .scnac of meaning iind of belonging; art is a rou»e that helps reveal nature's secrets. And individual school.s take on the character of different creative personalities, free of in.s'.itutionnl rigidity and state control. Steiner advised against a merely intellectual .school day, firmly believing in the seriousness of play: oil main lessons have recreational a.spects. Students document their ideas by writing and drawing in special notebooks. Art is taught not to make children into artists, but to expose them to the healing influence of color, to exercise their creative wills, and to counteract the tendency of our time to set the imnginotion apart from learning. Music is also tended as a b.-inie component of learning. Life, said Steiner, is intrinsically musical. Interval, tone, polyphuny — all . nffeclour thinking and ordering of experience. Thus in Waldorf edu cation, music may be interwoven with botany, geometry, astronomy. Dunce is taught as a combination of sound, motion and lnnj>un^'c — ond expressed in a unique form call eurhythmy. (As with most Waldorf lessons, this multiple-skill exercise appears to aynchronize several different sectors of the brain.) Steiner also encouraged his teachers to include the ele ments of humor ond Nurpriue. Sixty years after the first Waldorf School was cetablishcd there still remains a need for this epcciol typo of education — and its whole sy.stem.s opproach t« liumtin ciipahilities UcHeurelivr: as diver.>*c as Hnword Gardner, Ueuven i''eucrstein and Bob Samples ure now calling fur multiple approaches the reach ir. * the whole brain and echo Stcinc comprehensive vision. Meanwhi our most important social critio arc point ’ng to the kind of litcrn logical thinking which Steiner saw as onc-.sided, egoistic, and responsible for the most pressin; Rroblem.s of our tinr.c. M. C. Richards, ? poet, potto anu teacher trained in the Stein- methods asks, "If we arc all so smart ond creative and highly educated, why are our schools characterir.ed by confusion, ill- will, violence and sterility?" Richards points to the rage that bred by our current authorituriai system. Archetypal psychologist Jam Hillman underscores Steiner's emphasis on the arts and the imogination ns u form of culture, therapy und a necessary aNpert i /•df-heuling — and asks why the. are the very things we are deniec "Do we know what idea of the human underlies the school.x to which our children arc sent?" Millmun cautions us against tacitly accepting the rational model — which blocks us from our full humanity. The whole . Steiner pre.scription — feeling, imagination, music, ort and movt. ment — is necessary for a bal anced view of life. Otherwise we become trapped, says Hi'lmnn, b> rational sy.stcm.i that lead to irrn tional nets, from domestic violenc to global conflict. Through crea tivity, the unconscious can he pos itively channelled and expressed. Olherwine, warns Hillman, we ar> controlled by our own weapons: "Idoos wc don't know wo have, have us." — Carolyn HeynoUs For further information RUDOLF STEINER COLLEGE. contact: 9200 Fair THH TAnnYTOWN LETT Oaks Blvd., Fair oaks, C.^ 9562B, ^916) 961-8727 p To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:August 13, 1990 Subject:#1576 John & Kit Wojcik, 3310 Bayside Road Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IA, Single family lakeshore residential, 2 acre, unsewered Application - Request for side setback variance to construct additions to existing residence lot. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Construction Plans Pertinent Pacts - 1. Applicants existing residence is 18.7' from the side lot line where a 30' setback is normally required. Applicant proposes additions to the existing residence, which include a proposed covered porch that will be located 27.7' from the side lot line. 2. The proposed room addition, as well as a proposed porch and deck addition on the south end of the house, both meet the 30' setback. Only the entryway covered porch is the subject of this variance request. Discussion The proposed additions will not increase the number of bedrooms in the house, but will add one bathroom. The City Council reviewed the issue of expansion of this house as an administrative appeal, and has granted approve 1 for the applicants to proceed with additions subject to documenting the status of the septic system in the chain of title of the property. The house site on the adjacent property to the east will be approximately 150-200' to the rear, hence the proposed additions will not intensify the perceived density of the neighborhood. The proposed additions are no closer to the side lot line than the existing house. The hardship is the location of the existing house, with the intent to provide a more functional entryway. Staff Recommendation Staff would recommand approv.l, based on the findings noted above. Isv CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application 1 PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 33^ OAc->^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) \t* n CITY if uRCtiO Fl!^Af€E CfFICE ~ „ 1350200000 # 01 QEH il.S ru:-fT i. 111. Ti Ik. } 7? iir RtCElRr-THiOiK YW , Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. i u t •* :> A / *1 Vi 1 Cm } f T n ^Tt't’T’^7 07/27/90 APPLICANT Name and V{.V Vlc^Ct'k Address; 3> i\C _______ OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) (j I > ~ ^ 3 - 3c ^ 1> Phone (wor)c )/h . \^ («I ^ ~ ^ ^ City: U Zip: *5*^ 3S(r t Phoi.a (home) _ _ _ Name Phone (woric) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT DSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District •• * r-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Use of Property ResidentialN Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $(O. Qoo Describe request in detail: vV-<Ag- 30 VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setbac)c Variances ( Lot Width Front Hardcover X Side Rear) Other HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; 1;^ u DESCRIPTION OP DNDSDAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements;_ _ _ _ _ _cuV>c-\>^ •_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 2. 3.1 REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form * ... Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover’ ca-l-cu-l-at-ions as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Slcetches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. v-T. 5-C 6. 7. 8. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11" X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour variance application is not complete if the above, information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. X\Applicant's Signature Date *7 2^(o \ Q OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City stafc, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request Owner's Signature Date 1 / VApplicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commissipn Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all s-;heduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangement;, to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. I ! J RUN DATE 07/25/90 BATCH 002 PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR 0NT4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INPORMATIOf^ SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST 56 05-117-23 lA 0005 03280 BAYSIOE RD D J NYHAMMER A S 6 OLSEN DALE J NYHAMMER/SUSAN OLSEN 3200 CAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 lA 00A7 03332 BAYSIOE RD INFO RESEARCH ASSOC INC INFO RESEARCH ASSOC INC PO 815=7 ROSEVILLE HN 55113 38 05-117-23 lA 0057 00350 CRESrVIEH AVE ROSE M MADDEN ROSE H MADDEN 350 CRESTVIEH AVE LONG LAKE \U 55356 38 05-117-23 A1 0022 00A05 OXFORD RD F DE5t4ISON SHAN JR ETAL F DENNISON JR I JAf4ET SHAH A05 OXFORD ROAD LONG LAKE It4 55356 38 05-117-23 lA 0008 03310 BAYSIOE RD J H HOJCIK A K L HOJCIK JOHN H HOJCIK A KIT L HOJCIK 3310 BAYSIDE RD LAKE LAKE MT4 55356 00A8 RD 33 D5-117-23 lA 033A8 BAYSIDE HARRIET HEHL HARRIET A HEHL 33A8 BAYSIDE RD ROUTE 1 LOf4G LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 lA 0058 03300 BAYSIDE RD THE LANOSCHUTE GROUP INC THE LANOSCHUTE GROUP VK 2222 PLATNOOO RD HINT4ETONKA 404 553A3 TOTAL BATCH 002 00010 REPORT NO. PIA35401 PAGE 3 38 05-117-23 lA 0010 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED DOIK^LAS L NASH ET AL DOUGLAS A SHIRLEY N4^H 27U CRESTVIEH AVE LOT4G LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 lA 0056 00320 CRESTVIEH AVE JOm F LEHMEYER JOHN F LEHMEYER 320 CRESTVIEH AVE L044G LAKE 4t4 55356 CO 38 05-117-23 A1 0016 OOAOO OXFORD RD J C DEMEO A M V DEHEO JOSEPH C A VICTORIA DEMEO AOO OXFORD RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 ■ I rH I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATIWJ OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUtUY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY JAXATION. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF DATE :partment of property t nUhn^yi i c , ■d-zV-^O r <^ni£.0. few Or^My fetu (yryno ’ lir’fy- ------ ' _____ lilS.ia^j'TE!! oiuJ hi 5S3ZS AUG 2 0 1990 To PlcmniOii- dcwm/ii/M — TlliS I'i. I /'L AiMWCiL-, ~k> CifphCahiT'^i^ I5'2(>- -j'OhrL-1 Hi'Y^^'^ojtil^. . i\JiZ a r'(L na'cUi lx»'z> w ihi, tcujf - 32 ?o PiMpi(k^:JRozid. vJe.hsiL Yta.j- Ulo c. Ea proposed^ qddivt4'\ ^ivMLd. j3 ciiVMiy,- CwVipjefl^ upprOifed btp u-iM- ijha- Ctrpmiisuii. (7 (7 'iciokl sj. i\'i/4icin')/ii^»'St'sajv. G'ii^i\_ • I I - : "*r. • i r‘-' r-.. •.- *-••• V r * .‘ • * c>:: i*-.• • -r. .•' ri •i. *• ;• r rr- '‘•v’iA . — # ' - ?/ 1 •. !] iT . • • f j .• • ' -»• 4 , • it-r: ^r*j . 4"?3-fc3t4 ■ ■; To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:August 15, 1990 Subject: #1577 Norman Torrison, 2250 Longview Circle - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-IB, Single family rural residential, 2 acre, unsewered Application - Request for side setback variance to construct tennis court. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Plat with Topographic Overlay Air Photo Neighbor Acknowledgement Form Pertinent Facts - 1.Applicant proposes to construct a 60'x 120' tennis court, 5' from his north side lot line where a 30' setback would normally be required. 2.The variance is requested due to topography of the site. Applicant requests a 5' lot line setback to keep the bulk of the proposed clay tennis court on the most level area of the lot. (See topographic survey). 3.The existing drainage and utility easement is 1_02 either side of the north lot line, hence a 5' setback would encroach 5' into that easement. 4.There is a designated wetland at the very southeast corner of the lot. The proposed tennis court location is in excess of 60' from the wetland. Meeting the required north lot line setback would force the tennis court to within about 35' of the wetland, and result in the need for significant additional grading and the use of retaining walls. 5.The existing septic system is directly south of the house, with the alternate drainfield site just east of that. The tennis court as proposed will have no impact on either the existing or future drainfield sites. Zoning File #1577 August 15f 1990 Page 2 Discussion The standard tennis court orientation is north/south, hence the slopes on this lot tend to limit the reasonable locations for the standard x 120' tennis court. The proposed location, 5' from the north lot line, is about 60' from the east lot line or 90'+ from the resident structure to the east. The residence to the north is approximately 150' from the tennis court. The applicant has discussed the setback proposal with the property owner to the north, and staff has discussed the plan with^ the property owner to the east, neither of which has stated any specific objections to the project. The neighbor to the east was pleased that the tennis court is proposed to be 60' from their lot line rather than the 30' minimum. Staff would recommend that drainage from the tennis court be directed to the south rather than the east, eliminating the possiblity for any drainage to the neighboring property to the east. The City's current standard for drainage and utility easements along interior lot lines of plats is 5' either side of the line. This plat was done before that standard took effect. However, in discussing this specific easement with the Public Works Director, he feels that there is some potential for future need of the entire 10' easement within applicant's property, for utility purposes, based on the location of the house to the east. His recommendation therefore is to allow a 10' setback from the lot line, but. not a 5' setback. Further, the Public Works director suggested that the City ask for a "Hold-Harmless Agreement" for the entire 30' setback area, anticipating that if the City needed to install utilities at some future date, the tennis court would possibly encroach into the needed temporary construction easement. The other side of that coin is that we would allow an accessory garage or other accessory structure of normal size, to be located up to 10' from the lot line without such a Hold-Harmless Agreement, hence one could argue that the need for such an Agreement is excessive. Applicant has stock-piled the bags of clay for the clay court, on the cul-de-sac. While thf. court could be constructed without a variance, that will result in the need tor significant retaining walls and additional grading work on the site. Staff Reconmendation Based on the Public Works Director's review of the easement, stc'f would recommend approval of a 10' minimum setback to the north lot line (with the optional condition for a Hold-Harmless Agreement for portions of the tennis court less than 30* from the lot line.. Zoning File #1577 August 15, 1990 Page 3 Planning Commission feels justified in making the following findings, then a recommendation for approval would be appropriate: 1. No neighboring properties will be adversely affected by the tennis court located 10' from the north lot line. 2. Forcing the tennis court to meet the required 30' north side setback would result in the need for additional grading work near a wetland area, and a significant increase in necessary tree removal on the property. 3. The topography and the necessary north/south orientation for the tennis court limit the potential possible sites for a tennis court on the property. Isv » o / / / / CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE AFFLICTION H Initial Application Fee $1757oO^ ^ ($50.00 per each addtbio»a4r-variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) FROFERTY LOCATION Site -- - - - Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) « f t 1*1 I ."‘rrv <’cVA * I Ul U-MV ;v MAVi-ViT LV-flit ? T=‘/ir'»-vVW .A.'w’Vi:. .'vvvv «... rr=" /Vi i I w* • ‘.'V Tl I'o.iJC /)7 /•“ 7 / V I / IM f ^ Attach legal description to application if not included on HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from s^ct * enforcement qf zoning regulations: DESCRIPTION OP UNDSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: ^ /Li S<->3 S/TirJTf IS . looux-V /)cJa ____ IRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form . . Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). ) Cortificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. - -— • «,>; ^ Slcetches or plans of floor and elevation views. ^ As an addendum to this applicationr please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 CO^TSS OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR_ _ A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. mm mm mm mm mm mm ^m mm ^m mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm ^m mm ^m ^m ^m ^m mm mm ^m mm The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above infomation has not been included. mm ^m mm ^m mm mm ^m mm mm ^m mm ^m mm mm mm mm mm mm m* mm mm mm ^m mm mm mm ^m mm mm mm mm m t^m mm ^m mm mm mm mm mm ^m ^m Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date- - - - - - - - - - APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE . , The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional ^ees (staff time not covered by origiT^l fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of th;^ ^rpp 11 c^tiro^, and certifies that^ the information supplied is true and co^re^t to tfie c^f lilu/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature /////^/ / / /rn/rj^------- uate /-V/■X 7 OWNERS SIGNATURE j ^ k The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and rurtner authorizes reasonabLe ^try onto the property by City atatf, consultants, agents, Commission>TOemljers^,.^aTid^o»tnci i members for purposes of investiga tion and verification/^)f tnis^^queay: / Owner's Signature _ _ _ _ Date _ _ _ _ Applicant must' ha^ all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on tne third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. Tf an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. Adjacent Property Oimers* Acknowledgement Form I (we) V\VkO4 of €^3"7.5' Ct/zci.g' "print address][print neune(s) J have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ also referred to as Land Use Application No I (we) understand that in e^iecuting this acknowledgement^ I (we) am (are) not asked declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval 7 Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building 6 Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ri 4/ 1 i ii.I V .•W-3Nt t V «X V • w 9 • i {a 1 8 g •V N# -M, ii:• rn (91 ) •1 A ^ «*3^, {.’7 U) t (rci I « I -- 90 W %• It oil > j'i . 'n) '5r^-"Gcr» PC 111 (02) 01 \\ . 7t (VI NIA3Q) ‘ TT7T RUN DATE 07/20/90 BATCH 002 PROP ADDR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP ADDR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ACDR OHNER N.\Hi TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR 0HT4ER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR CMIER NAHE TAXPAYER NAra/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNEM NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INF0RMATI0r4 SYSTEM PROPERTY OlflERS LIST SB OS-117-23 21 0010 OOOSa ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HILLIAH F HARTFIEL JR ET AL HILLIAH F A HELEN C HARTFIEL 2225 DEVIN LA LONGULAKE HN 55356 38 03-117-23 21 0021 00185 BRONN RD S C t J KROG44ESS CHARLES A JEAN KROGNESS 185 BROm RO S LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 03-117-23 22 0009 OOOSB ADDRESS UNASSIGNED LONGVIEH HOHEOHNERS ASSN INC LONGVIEN HOHEOHNERS ASSN I»C 2300 LONGVIEH CIRCLE LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 03-117-23 22 002^ 02325 LONGVIEH CIR SAD HOOD STEPHEN R A DANA K 32 APPLE GLEN RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 I 38 03-117-23 23 0006 02355 ABINGDON HAY DAD LEHIS DAD LEHIS 2355 ABINGDON HAY LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 03-117-23 2^ 0005 02205 ABINGDON HAY R B BRUCE A C K BRUCE ROBERT A CHRISTINE BRUCE 2205 ABINGD0f4 HAY LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 03-117-23 21 0012 02225 DEVIN LA H F HARTFIEL A H C HARTFIEL HILLIAH F A HELEN C HARTFIEL 2225 DEVIN LA LONG LAKE M4 55356 38 03-117-23 22 0007 02275 LONGVIEH CIR S H BUCHHOLZ ADA BUCHHOLZ STEVEN A DEBORAH BUCHHOLZ 2275 LONGVIEH CIR L0f4G LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 22 0018 02265 DEVIN LA B J A D C KOKAL BRUCE J A DIANE C KOKAL 2265 DEVIN LANE LONG LAKE M4 55356 36 03-117-23 22 0025 02295 LONGVIEH CIR R G HARDIN AKA HARDIN ROBERT G HARDIN 2295 L0t4GVIEH CIR L044G LAKE MT4 55356 38 03-117-23 23 0007 02265 ABIf4G00e4 HAY P C NELLES A K T HELIES P C NELLES A K T HELLES 2285 ABU4GOOT4 NAY ORONO MN 55356 38 03-117-23 29 0006 02150 ABINGOCN HAY MICHAEL T GUSTAFSOri ET AL PERRYBELL INVESTMCNTS If4C SUITE 900 10000 HIGMHAY 55 MPLS MM 55991 REPORT NO. PI935901 PAGE 7 38 03-117-23 21 0017 02165 COLIN DR J P EARLING A C P HALDRON J0llt4 P EARLIf4G 2165 COLIN DR L0t4G LAKE m 55356 38 03-117-23 22 0008 02250 LONGVIEH CIR N F A M V F TORRISON NORMAN F T0RRIS0T4 2250 LOriGVIEH CIRCLE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 22 0019 02315 DEVIN LA 0 J PORTMANN A T A PORTHANN DOUGLAS J A TAHRA A PORTHANN 2315 DEVIN LANE LONG LAKE It4 55356 .J :) 38 03-117-23 23 0004 02300 LONGVIEH CIR CONSTANCE M SCOTT COr4STAf4CE M SCOTT 2300 L0f4GVIEH CIRCLE L0T4G LAKE MN 55356 S8 03-117-23 23 0006 02255 ABINGDON HAY FAC STirCHFIELO FREDERICK/CHERVL STINCHFIELO 3058 HIfl»4EHAHA CT HAYZATA 55391 TOTAL BATCH 002 00017 •• .'300 00 /?67 0O* • STA/^ /^oT^ Aa9'»4673*f .*■* lit :• 02 n r-‘----------3 —; »n~of‘cXs>» ma*7 suQim^i of^f O*^ ^/71? /MP -ip •— .•‘-••*r »s ■«.,.‘j -L.. • .‘wr^i <a«^ o r^i . bi 80 OOO O «fkO r>;NP- O • • • ■ OCj <3 Qf V. ??i? • • # N ^O KJQ[ I fei!^ « u. .• ».* . ; r .vner tushBi Am . / / .* / ......'-'■r~srj-AtE'6F- m 1 ••.■ j.*- •• > • :• .., ••.*•• • . • .. •« . • •*. , r.**«’* , "^r\ rJ I ' * _ ~ correct reoi^< I 5hon i-'^t’aiv menu ^rl fo "A.niDOf'y rl,.(<60n'•■’' p, to %,poni h , f., >'•" I ' •'- •'■f r,.»^ • /f /OO' i « c •5=: $ •—. f 'O It ?0 :> r 6 H’i ^ ■K k ■ . 0^. I io£$!i;;cop-- 150 lOO scale in feet 200 <t : .Or<of 0 1 * ‘I I I I I •*i -t I I I I I "•V* — fo I h—10 Drainage and Uhlif^ Cosemenis ore ahoi^n fhus ■ Being iO feef in widfh, unless odierh’ise indicofed, ond adjoining !of fines as shonn on fhepfaf. o Denotes iron monumenr Bearings sfiovn are iissui 9 I± * I ■^-•0 4/A^/y to: Beinq tO h riqjfv^cf-t &fU, SCHpE E N G I N* E .f ,< - • J L r '!> ' Ir ■■':'! ■ giTAiw tT:rrr:^ r ^ KII6Wf''i'4'SSia>r.‘^V8SsW«'. m P'PK i \ ^ iJ;:> •■ ^t*!i f^,' -**-1 ■* ♦ / /} K'3»V Hi ' *‘f %5 •-,r. j| t - ; * i LUirfc* *• ".- ' * '*■• • ^ :' .;rr-3^‘4i i^ Z Z '* • ,i il^ m tU . :; ,, 7 r Vii*/ ! i ' * ^'It %'mmmCfaTlOl c « l^>tn%f^4^ f'4^% r • • i> X’ •J t : V >% ' ^ fl 4•' J I " ’ ,* • ^ ............................................ ..:: •• ',w m «w . » '• • t * .; ■ '4 -t ■V •'^•^.f . 4.n\TQAV-fci /■ vr : ■v .. HR-^:;=r>;;>;••.»' ■ Efer • K4#^ ' i'">tij'iiiSt.'5= mM • - ■ ‘ 2 £i: £ ' •< .-^ " K I .1 i * i ^ tu »-,^3SV: ^'‘T>.; n^i i’ ' * r ■ :•'. i."; i'ttf.it ■1.- . V*. r a^> p!.>^ t»* •’S MWl- -•ji jr. :^‘‘if “ - ,y ^ .*■ V ' "'.y ^ ^' Iff - •• •■ * ' •" ^ 7 ' I >«T *“’ f .'>.» ' 4\ rif;.p'li •4<i ^T- ., ilf u M To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: August 17» 1990 #1578 Al & Libby Hopwood, 1205 Lakeview Avenue After-the-fact Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-IB, Single family rural residential, 2 acre, sewered Application - Request for front and side street setback variances to construct a deck/walkway on the northwest side of the house. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Staff Letter to Applicants 6/28/90 Construction Plans Pertinent Facts - 1.Applicants recently constructed a detached garage, and during that construction started to construct a deck on the street side of the house to expand their front stoop area. Staff advised them of the need for a permit and it was determined that a variance is necessary, because the complete proposal includes decks substantially above grade which must meet principal structure front yard setbacks. 2. Setbacks are as follows: Existing House Proposed Deck Front Setback (N) Side Street Setback (W) 29.2' 28.3* 27 23 Required 50' 50' 3.Proposed lot coverage including the existing house, the 22’x30' garage, the 12'xl2' chicken coop, and the 8'x41 deck, is 12.9%, meeting the 15% limit. Discussion - The proposed deck will extend along the entire length of the house. Portions of the proposed deck near the front entry might meet the 30" or lower height requirement in order to not need a railing. However, applicants note they wish to extend the deck over the tuckunder garage area and definitely want to have a railing around the entire deck for safety purposes. i Zoning File #1578 August 17, 1990 Page 2 of 2 Visually, the deck will appear as an extension of structure closer to the road. Due to the corner lot nature of this property, the extent of the visual encroachment created by the decks may be minimal in the context of the neighborhood, especially if the deck is not enclosed above or below it. However, the applicants' plan shows lattice to completely visualIv enclose the areas beneath the deck, which acts to make this appear as a significant extension of the house. On the other hand, this lattice might p.r:v.icle some screening for apparently much needed storage on the prc,peri:y. Staff has received no comments from the neighbors regarding this specific deck proposal. The applicants just recently constructed a garage on the property to create additional interior storage areas. This property has a long history of exterior storage violations and neighborhood complaints, which staff hopes will be minimized in the future now that the garage has been completed. One issue dating to 1984 or previously, is the keeping of chickens on the property, which is not allowed on any property less than 3 acres in area, especially in a neighborhood of 1/4 to 1/2 acre lots. Applicants have discussed this with Building Inspector Bruce Vang, and have agreed to get rid of the chickens. Staff Recommendation - Planning Commission must determine whether the proposed 8'x41* deck with lattice areas between the posts is a visual and physical encroachment towards the street lot lines that is appropriate in the context of this neighborhood. If approval is recommended. Planning Commission may wish to consider specific conditions regarding enclosure above or below the deck. •i 1^' CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee :i5TTaT'^v,($50.00 per each additiSTTal variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fe *! .I O a •:.. PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) /D '/H-CX)^! t 1 fi'hnL L dr#■ IL-t, ‘ "02000»a Wk/Vi n't *J/5.50 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. fTP ^(“try TiV. I .'kut f L X t w* • «.‘U*'"**7** T* « * Lr.*if A * vn i Mk-uwai I im«f\ f wu — •» I i r* r’:<* i Zi’t 1 • ! T APPLICANT____ Phone (home) Name .hVoW"t<?. _________Phone (work) ; 1 \\ P City: Zip: / V »/ w » / /V Address OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of.Property Other (specify) _ DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $7Wo' Describe request in detail: VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Setback Variances (_^_ Front Other _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Hardcover Side Rear) . • • HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning reaula^*6ns:( o’rl-W. rx Cu-^USf_Uc.cc. h\e^X 4Anor"0-C^*»\Xro^ ^ 4* ^ l!> co IrC^rr>^ DESCRIPTION OF DNUSDAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements ;M1 r> O C PC' \ rr4r^ \ \ b-'S.. CO^rr-4^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _i V X© 8. OIRBD SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form ^^ Certified' Property Owners List of owners within .15^ (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finantre A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to induce hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application# please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the edwve information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete Initialed by Clerical Staff;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator# agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this appli^tion, and certifies that the information supplied is true and cor^^]^ to yth^ best o^his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signatuije~~?/. T Date ^ __l.Q* OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff# consultants# agents# Commission memb^ars# and C^ncil memb^i^s for purposes of investiga tion and verification^/6^/^is iremiest. ODate n ;;•-/. 9a id.'iSOwner' s Signaturjer" Applicant must^h*^^ all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting# please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. I V / • t “T" /.40 niJ: a:a>‘^ (U) 7.’ 5'>* 9 i’ \i •W rr j V ' 5 «« ♦• w. >OrVT 9 • 4 ' <«0 (74) V 0 ;T?ni-T_^^-urtvt n*tt 'V on^*Na 9QUL9 SE TO ?^is .40 ^1 ^ ^'’^e9^TAL'\' : T Tt •>1 140 (40) 1 ‘_______ 1 .!lS' SAf 5< \ s -14^.V IJO 2^_X ( ‘40 «’ CaTSTAL T 40 a (la) ^|2Ht3) ^ 1st ’ "^StC ** (TT) ! .»■ V ’ '^s ...'£341.? (in ^ (10) S/ (23) •il 66 0 i •*/ 144 y ^ ( ^9) \ j?/>jQ jt( 24 ) "'stki'^ (») '»•/ « ; ru S 5 (26) “ vtIjv. •/ 'rt > •H o/ tr) f*A < ^lA t fiimOT i (19) -f(5e);* (57)^ r^Ts— A.'E ^7^ UI 3)3 1 ^ (45) ^ j 3 1 (47) :J^l RUN DATE 07/26/90 BATCH 001 PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATIOt^ SYSfEM PROPERTY ONNERS LIST SB 10-117-2S 0017 01115 NILLON OR S TOOD H GADRIELSON ET AL TODD H I SUE E GADRIELSON 1115 NILLON DR S NAYZATA HN 55391 38 10-117-23 29 0021 01205 LAKE VIEN AVE A L HOPHOOO I L 6 HOPi AL L HOPNOOD 1205 LAKEVIEN AVE NAYZATA HN 55391 I » 38 10-117-23 29 0029 01295 LAKE VIEN AVE J I S CARLSON J D I S A CARLSON 1295 LAKEVIEN AVE NAYZATA m 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0070 01215 ARBOR ST CHAUNCEY H SANOGREN ETAL C H SANOGREN 1215 ARDOR STREET NAYZATA HN 55391 38 10-117-23 29 0019 C1220 LAKE VIEN AVE DOUGLAS PAUL SCHNOOR A NIFE DOUGLAS A NORMA SCHNOOR 1220 LAKEVIEN AV NAYZATA HN 55391 38 10-117-23 29 0022 01212 ARDOR ST BETTY J FLAM RICHARD A COLLEEN FLAM 1212 ARBOR ST NAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 29 0031 01185 AR80R ST S A R CARLS0I4 STEPHEN C A RANOI J CARLSON 1165 ARBOR ST NAYZATA m 55391 TOTAL BATCH 001 00010 REPORT NO. PI935401 PAGE 1 38 10-117-23 29 U020 01165 BRONN RD S 0 A J FISCHER DErJNIS N FISCHER 1165 S BRONN ROAD NAYZATA HN 55391 38 10-117-23 29 0023 01225 LAKE VIEN AVE V H ROLLINGS ETAL VIRGIL H ROLLINGS 1225 LAKEVIEN NAYZATA IU4 55391 VH i 4 38 10-117-23 31 0069 01230 ARBOR ST ROBERT R BRAUN ETAL ROBERT R BRAUN 1230 ARBOR ST NAYZATA HN 55391 .3 H) I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENIATI0T4 OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEfMEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATIttl* TO THE BEST OF MY MXMLEOGE AND BELIEF DATE i^ctirvn': ' QE^ oronc H CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323• Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka June 28, 1990 A1 &. Libby Hopwood 1205 Lakeview Avenue Wayzata, MN 55391 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Hopwood: The Building & Zoning Department is in receipt of 1990 ^ A a building permit, which was received by this office on June 21, Review of the application finds that this deck with railing is considerea as an encroachment into the required 50* front yard, "^®^®5°gtback isbe permitted unless a variance is granted. Also, because a 50 setback is also required from your north lot line along Lakeview Avenue, it appears t^t no portion of the deck can be approved without a variance. Because the deck has already been partially constructed, your options would be as follows: 1. Remove the deck in its entirety. 2^ Remove all portions of the deck that have platform height more than 30" above grade and remove railings from the portion that remains or lower the de^ck so that it doesn't need a railing. A Fl^^form deck which does not extend above the main floor levex and which does not need railings, would not have to meet setbacks. This woula eliminate the portion over your ole' garage, but might allow some aeck to remain near the front entry area. 3^ AddIv for a front and side street setback variance. The cost of variance application is $175.00, and your application submittals would have to be in by 12:00 noon, Friday, July 27th to meet the next Planning Commission deadline. A building permit cannot be issued for the structure and you mus^ cease work on it until this matter is resolved. Please f^eel free contact me at 473-7357 so that we can meet to discuss your options. Sincere Jichael P. Ga^lfon, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/tln Enclosure - variance application cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Lyle Oman, Senior Building Inspector BLinfl«WPit)NV^.h97S.7ji7ie ^unance -473-t ASSESSING PL BUG WORKS - 4717359 1 ’ ir 'll ii . ’•‘•.■.■.iii <‘j)/I i C mIJ ..la - .* ?• .*-• ••. *...--.-.1 — .• .?;... . ^•*# . .. . : i • j . I < *• ! I 1; r . I i ? • I 4 • f i . i • i! i: I ! r* . To i'6vCiC -1x4 i•••1 1• • V ! I f 1 1 1 • • 1 - **t i !*1 i 1 \• 1 • !t 1 1•«1 • 1 tFrt*t .1 lOU' ....................... |C..:: ir""I - ------ 2/6 ooitr • j,..»., i : -1 1 4 t t •- 1 -:... »• 1 1 1 / 'C J u ?• Q 3 ul -•I 4-'✓' 1 1 y' ( 1 f 1 1 • 1 ( 1 • • 1 1 1 « 1 i 1 1 i 1 SM"-----------.•iOPV/OOD OROWO . iPr.A.i. «i«t» *tl -^Jt •%•'»> . ** I • M>4 . i • *»i’. >••• I < > ’ •»!» * » ; * .* I i 4 i I I ir I O ^ j f y • 4 • :: ■ i • • 1 . . i 206' L,^KE'//£V .WE , 01 ; i * I fi ' I A ; ^ 1 i. i a •a ! .11 r I i • f I 1 r ■i ■4 •? 1 < • t> » I — To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Dat<e:August 17, 1990 Subject: #1579 Garry & Marie Everson, 4755 North Shorii Drive - After-the-Fact Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IB, Single family lakeshore residential, 1 acre, sewered Application - Request for after-the-fact variance for decks constructed without a permit. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Staff Memos of 5/18/90 from Gaffron and Oman Construction Plans Hardcover Calculations by Applicant's Surveyor Copy of Assessor's Record RE: Pre-existing Deck Air rhefco- Documentation of City Action Regarding Deck Pertinent Pacts - 1.In October 1988 the Inspections Department observed a new deck constructed at the applicant's residence and subse>^ .ently sent a letter notifying the property owner that a permit was required. Subsequent discussion with the property owner and a site inspection by the Building Inspector found that the deck was all new construction. The applicants submitted an incomplete building permit application on December 30, 1988, they were advised to provide the «^urvey and hardcover calculations necessary to complete the application. With no response from the applicant, a citation was issued for working without a building permit on April 18, 1989. The applicant's did not respond to the citation, hence the City Attorney issued a formal complaint. The property owners again failed to appear, and in February 1990 paid a $74.00 fine without ever appearing in Court (see Oman memo of May 18, 1990). In February 1990, the City again sent letters to the defendant advising him that payment of the fine does not resolve the problem. Applicant's finally met with City staff in March 1990, and in May 1990 provided the survey which verifies that hardcover on the property is excessive, and the deck is over the lot line. r:.f t-rO wjrr Zoning File #1579 August 17, 1990 Page 2 Applicants proceeded with the necessary after-the-fact variance application, although they were advised that the City could not ultimately allow the continuing encroachment of the deck over the lot line, and that a hardcover variance request might not be successful. 2. Per the survey, the deck is approximately 2' over the lot line. City codes allow a platform type deck with no railing to extend to within 2' of a side lot line. A deck such as this with a railing must be setback 10' from the side lot line. 3. Hardcover on the property, as calculated by the applicants surveyor with one revision by staff and shown in detail on the survey, is as follows: Zone Zone Area Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover 0-75' 75-250' 10,035 s.f. 10,309 s.f 430 s.f. (4%) 5910 s.f. (57.3%)2577 s.f, (25%) 4, The assessor's record card indicates that an X 13* deck previously existed adjacent to the garage and screen porch. That deck extended approximately 4' lakeward from the house, as compared to the new deck which extends about 10' lakeward from the house. Dimensions of the previously documented deck are 13* X 18', or 230 s.f. The currently existing deck has dimensions 9* X 38' plus an extension toward the lake averaging 10' deep x 16' wide, for a total deck area of 502 s.f, 5. The average lakeshore setback line coincides with the lakeshore side of the house. The old deck encroached 4' past the average setback line. The new deck encroaches 10' past the average setback line. No neighboring property owners have views that are affected by this encroachment. 6. The applicants have constructed a 7' high fence along the street side of the length of the deck. Because this fence is over 6' high based on the grade at the driveway, such a fence would need a building permit, unless it was dropped to a height of 6'. Discussion The piers from the pre-existing 13' x 18' deck are still in place, hence we believe the assessor's records are correct. There is no question that the 13' x 18' deck was completely removed and the currently ,constructed deck is entirely new as of 1988. Zoning file #1579 August 17, 1990 Page 3 Th'*s lot is similar to the Wally Krahl property to the immediate w€ : which the house is below the road and there is significant he*2<- -over (rock and plastic) north of the house to help eliminate basement water problems while providing a ground cover where no grass would likely grow. As indicated above, staff noted one minor addition to hardcover which the surveyor did not note on his survey, i.e. 4' x 40' rock bed adjacent to the driveway. It appears that applicant has been digging a trench underneath the 3 season porch adjacent to the deck. If the intent is to replace the existing porch support posts with a concrete wall and footings, that also will require a building permit. Given the lengthy process through which staff has attempted to gain compliance on this property, the applicant has enjoyed at least two seasons of use of this deck system. However, with little existing hardcover area that can be reasonably removed to significantly reduce hardcover on the property, the added deck area is significant from a hardcover standpoint. Staff Recoomendation 1. Staff recommends that the 20' x 9' deck section furthest from the house, which extends 2' into the next property, be removed in its entirety, and this area revert back to non-hardcover. This will not only reduce hardcover by 180 s.f., but will eliminate the encroachment across the line and the encroachment into the 10* required side yard setback area. 2. Planning Commission should determine whether the remaining 10' x 16' and 9' x 18' deck areas can remain, given the hardcover situation and the 10' encroachment past the average setback line. Removal of the 10' x 16' portion that extends lakeward of the house, would leave a originally existed. deck about 4' x 18' smaller than what 3. 4. 5. Planning Commission should determine if there are any other areas of hardcover on the property that can be eliminated to reduce the high percentage of hardcover in the 75-250' zone. For whatever deck is allowed to remain, applicant should be required to obtain an after-the-fact building permit and revise the deck as necessary to meet building code standards. Applicants paid only the standard $175 variance application fee. Does Planning Commission feel there is any justification to not require payment of the after-the-fact fee of an additional $175 which should have been collected at the time of application? CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION J± Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variant/ Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original aiplication) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) »• • A •A / • - PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address AviflWK S\hf)rP ^ Ti 1)0^ ^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) '*00^1 rrrv <-r norAinLrX r t Ut U*t\UlXU Z‘y n.rJI L Htm , A iXnflLu \Jt I AWU Ct^\ i/C'tvv iiilLth I tnnnts i t.»U ^ QmnA, m Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. SdL- APPLICANT Phone (home) ‘^7<jT Name C^Atri^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (work) ^ Address; 4l5^ l\f. v^hnr/> City; Qm\J^ Zip; *L OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name 'S^r\TC\9 Phone (work) Address;City;Zip; Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property ^r\r|'tninriil H Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Sj . 00 Describe request in detail; jpO-T* ^ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear) Other HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations t r* rdJ QPi DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:^_ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ UIRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include ^ hardcover calculations as required. 5,Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes ^ in existing grade are proposed. (m Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. 1, As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff.8. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above Infomation has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete Initialed by Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date '1 2^ OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this Owner's Signature n of this request. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date 7 3 C) Applicant must hdve all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. .'Si ATii .J BEPG:u IST and WICKLUNO'S AOON BERGOuIST AND WICKLUND'S PAPf. bOV 1 _ / I 1 »_J { <0 i .A *C 3X443; TOKAViril!/ ie?. I 43); ©Am ^ ' A A-' f\‘. (39) :;:^ -............- »4.\ 3 ?? -- k^;l46^ .........:3 ^' (H) , * / I J h j f • •• f RUN DATE 07/17/90 BATCH 010 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPtRTY INFORMATIOTI SYSTEM PROPERTY 0(«4ERS LIST PROP AODR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 38 07-117-23 32 0009 0^736 NORTH SHORE DR CHRISTINE J SCHANZENBACH CHRISTINE J SCHANZENBACH 4736 NORTH SHORE DR HOUNJ) m 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0010 04750 rJORTH SHORE DR JAMES R THOMSON ETAL JAMES THOMSON 4750 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND m 55364 PROP AODR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 3B 07-117-23 32 0012 047B4 NORTH SHORE DR JEFFREY J MARSHALL JEFFREY J MARSHALL 47B4 NORTH SHORE OR HOUND m 55364 3B 07-117-23 32 0''19 04745 NORTH SHORE OR HERMAN CRANFORD ETAL HERMAN CRANFORD 4745 m SHORE DRIVE HOUr40 MN 55364 PROP AODR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 3B 07-117-23 32 0021 04755 NORTH SHORE DR 6 R EVERSON P M E EVERSON GARRY A MARIE EVERSON 4755 NORTH SHORE DR HOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0022 04775 NORTH SHORE DR H A KRAHL ETAL HALTER A A D0»t4A L KRAHL 4775 NORTH SHORE DR fKHJND m 55364 PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR TOTAL BATCH 010 00009 #1 '■"•'■n :f • ^ REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 22 1 3B 07-117-23 32 0011 00038 ADDRESS UNASSURED RICHARD D CLIFFORD RICHARD D CLIFFORD 10155 GREEfORIER RD APT 208 Mir4NET044KA MT4 55343 3B 07-117-23 32 0020 04753 NORTH SHORE DR LESTER A DIETHART LESTER A DIETHART 4753 NORTH SHORE DR HOUND HN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0023 04795 NORTH SHORE DR STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF ORONO LAKE ACCESS LANES 6/19/70 ST DEED 136852 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENTJEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY KNOt4LEOGE AMO BELIEF DATE 1 IZ 0011 SS UNASSIGNED FFORO FFORD lER RO APT 208 55343 32 0020 SNORE DR HART HART lORE DR ;364 \ 32 0023 I SHORE DR :PT ) .ANES )EED 136052 AND TRUE ON THE RECORDS N» TO THE BEST confer C^iLCJULATlONSi (ArcAi * n f«e< ) tone HAWONel zi>Me MBA AteA LEGAL UESCRIPTION: j The southeasterly One-'.alf lH Lot 7, and Lots 5 and 6, Block 6, BERGQUIST AND WICK- LUND’S PARK, accordinq to the recorded plat thereof, Henne pin County, Mitinesota. 10,0»5 10,909 490 4% Co^trft^e 4-GENERAL NOTES Denotes iron monument Denotes cross chiseled in concrete Denotes existing spot elevation Denotes proposed spot elevotion Denotes surface droinoge Dashed contour lines denotes proposed feotures Solid contour lines denotes existing features ALL-METRO T.A ND SURVEYORS 2340 Daniels Street Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Ph. 475-1433 Proposed top of foundation elevation = Proposed bosement floor elevation * Proposed garage floor elevation = benchmark *. I hArtby cartify that this survay, plon or raport wot praporad by ma or undar my direct suparvition and that 1 am o duty Ragitlarad Land Survayor undar lha Iowa pf tha Stole o* Mmna^oto _________ DATE To; Bryan Crawford, City Attorney Prom: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: May 18, 1990 Subject: Zoning Review - Garry Everson Property 4755 North*Shore Drive Today I received a copy of the Certificate of Survey for the above referenced property, such survey being completed oy A Metro Land Surveyors. I would make the following specific comments regarding information shown on that survey: 1. The survey verifies that the wood deck for which the applicant was cited, is not in the 0-75' protected lakeshore setback zone. 2. It is unclear from the survey whether the deck ®^rends into the average lakeshore setback zone. construction is allowed to encroach toward the lake past a line drawn between the lake sides of existing residence structures on either adjacent property. (Reference Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B), attached.) 3. The wood deck has been constructed over the lot line and onto the neighboring Walter Krahl property to the ^st^ Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 iC), the non encroachment section, notes that a grade level deck cajmo extend closer than 2' from any lot line, and a deck structure that is above grade level so as to not meet th^e criteria for a grade level deck, would have to meet a 10 side setback in the LR-IB zoning district in which this property is located. 4. The final critical issue with this wood deck is that it increases the already excessive hardcover on the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2, limits hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone to 25%. This property is currently at 56% in that zone, and the contruction of the wood deck certainly exacerbated the pre-existing hardcove excesses. To summarize, portions of the currently existing wood deck which were newly constructed in 1988, and which resulted in i actionf do not conform to the Code because they ares A) Too close to the lot line (in fact over it); and B) Contributing to and increasing the pre-existing hardcover excesses on the property. Zoning Review May 18, 1990 Page 2 of 2 — Garry Everson Property 4755 North Shore Drive The property owner would appear to have 2 options: 1. Remove the decks which were added or totally repiac . City policy has been to allow repair of pre-existing decking, but total replacement of a non-conforming deck would not be allowed unless a variance is granted* 2. Applicant could make the appropriate after-the-fact application for a hardcover variance, with the knowledge that the City will expect portions of the deck encroaching on the required setbacks would have to be removed. There is no guarantee that a variance would be granted, and in a case where the hardcover on the property is so excessive, it is doubtful applicant would be granted approval to keep anything more than the original deck in that location. 1 *! JBUi,n-irrinrrtT”fMTrTi'r'ivfc‘ttmrtfcfigin<^--r -irtr—iiri i~ i t To: Fro Date: Bryan Crawford, City Attorney Lyle Oman, Senior Building Inspector May 18, 1990 Subject: 4755 North Shore Drive - Deck Construction Without a ■ Permit 10/21/83 letter sent notifying owner of requirement of permit for deck deadline date of 10/31/88. Permit application enclosed. 10/28/88 owner returns letter with note on bottom "the work we did to our deck was simply repair and replacement of existing, rotting decking and we are not aware this type of maintenance work required a permit". 10/31/88 letter sent to owner saying yes a permit is required for this type of work. Deadline given 11/8/88. 11/8/88 phone call asking if plans are required, I said I would do a site inspection to determine. 11/18/88 site inspection found deck to be of all new construction. 7 days to get permit noted on inspection slip left on site. 12/13/88 letter stating legal action will be initiated if no permit by 12/19/88. 12/30/88 permit application received. 2/2/89 Zoning Department sends letter requiring a Certificate of Survey and hardcover calculations within 45 days. 4/18/89 no response from applicant - citation issued for working without building permit. 6/8/89 applicant does not respond - Court sends delinquent ticket notice. 9/26/89 applicant does not respond - Attorney issues formal complaint. 10/17/89 failed to appear. Bench warrant issued. 1/2/90 Building Inspector requests police to enforce warrant (verbal). 2/21/90 Building Inspector request police to enforce warrant (in memo). 4755 North Shore Drive May 18, 1990 Page 2 of 2 - Deck Construction Without a Permit 2/26/90 Police attempt enforcement of warrant, wife of defendant states defendant is out of town. Officer accepts $74.00 fine from wife and declares case closed. 2/27/90 Inspector sends letter to defendant stating payment of fine in no way makes his deck a legal structure, requires permit application and required submittals to be provided to City no later than 3/6/90. 3/7/90 submittals not received. Inspector requests City Attorney to take further action. 3/16/90 applicants come to office to discuss and were told a survey must be provided. 5/18/90 survey provided ~ see attached memo from Mike Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator. J 1 4/ HARDCOVER CALCUUTION WORKSHE^f' SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' Existing Hardcover in Zone \ •‘ ^ iJ 250-500' 500-1000' A. House ^ ^Ajno.qe.x C = vS LENGTH - - - - - - -X j S.F. WIDTH V>^ >0*^’ A® % Garage , c. Driveway D. ’SlDEWM K fr 2.^^& S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. e. Patio / D eck C^..e.lt ftn4< &toir<. F.Landscape areas underlain ?^AST.C' ■ SHEETING S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. G. Other Total H ardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone B X 100 S«ji- Ojej-t. O'? ^Sur y S.F. S.F. lOfiSO S.F. [T S.F.E % 9 • ' TVMI «>• «v V'l« a M M cum I a a «w« a AOI mancTiOMOATt '■ • *•.*. i'j mmoviMiNfl T-i.* -r Vi 5^ ttZI XAUtt <3W •i^ '•' • I' . ■.'•A: 4 > i ■ * " - i. WWlCHtl - UkUBOH^tiA -isW'iiiL.^ C9 — • M * * •:> ,iZP .•i I® ■ • 4 s» ’-•4• :-t*5 '% ■i V" utmI •i-',___J^L- ;j ► .,-> - ! :. ... z:I IllViVtikV i^VM f(\lSH •rv t-‘‘ ‘ ' ’.'■. •;- < i• *' « f ’ K» ••r:\<i rwi»vb u:. «t •. V*. . . I ‘ • I t 1 ; 34^4 V ^•'14441 wj4ii I »S^ ;s.: i;j444i •;'41c 1 * I ‘ < • t •4V'; k 3CiC.o • • • /•• • :a\mm !Lvc7 ^. CITY OF DRONO CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66»Cry8Ul Bay. MinneaoU 55323 •Munidpd Office* On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka March It 1990 Bryan Crawford Popham/ Haik s Associates 3300 Piper Jaffray Tower 222 Ninth Street South Minneapolis, MN 55402 Re: Garry Richard Everson, 4755 North Shore Drive Deck Construci-ion Without Permi- Dear Bryan: you ^crycuo.lotter of Marches, 1.90. on formal " uld be more cost: effective to oeal any further comments on this le- Enclosed is a violation process failures. ^Please ^ny^or^ infcrmati^^ or if I process on this mat^er. free to contact me at my office,can assist you in any way, feel free to co .Sincerely, LO/tIn Enclosure cc! Jeanne A. Kabusth, Building 4 Zoning Administrator BUILDING k ZONING - 473-7357 ASSESSING ADMIMSTR.\T10N k FINANCE - 473-735« FAX-473-0510 PL'BUC WORKS - 473-7359 QF aFQNcr CITYofORONO Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323• Municipal Offices I On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka February 27, 1990 Gary Richard 4755 North Shorfe Hound, MN 55364 ?e:Deck construction without a Buildino Perc.it Dear Mr. Everson: •'ha*' vou hsve oaic a S74.00 fine on a i?taUonTs%u%“d\"o*;ou"f=-r'’bulldi-n= without a oercit. -his letter is to inforc you that oaycent °i| way itikes your deck a leosl a’TaooriM^ obtain a building permit ano r^n with the requiredvou wish to keep the ce_<:k An .pp-^-cat.on iubmittals must be proviceo .o the c..y oe.o. u ^ ^ 1. «-hp r ^ tv W‘'ll 3Ccin 1SSU8 If this deadline has w'll^be instructed to citations and the P‘^°^®‘r'J,V^:L^ssues‘before fines can be paid request the ^o and the case is closed. . ,-t.;‘c Desartnient (473-735). contact anyone in the Euilcing and .o...*ng ue.-a..* Sincerely, Lvle Oman, Senior Building Inspector LO/tln ,. . . Enclosure - Building Permit Application , j_,..ator '== i}!IS21l^P.”Sa£fr5A/Assf'?!anning"^o Administrator Bruce Vang, Building Inspector BUILDING * ZONING - ■m.7357 ASSESSING AD.MINISTRATION a FI.NANCE - 47>735i FAX-4734SI0 PUBUC WORKS - 473-7359 «^**«»*_*« - • • ^ * in^aaKg; .%•• .U-• *••,:••» •• .^. • . • V.-- * ? ••V • ... . • • • I • • . • .. i. % '• •• . • • • • . . • • . . M . .•*/ ». ' t f . • * • .:.. .*!• • •* ■*. •• 1 f%mwca « 1 irfMSf NUMBEe _• *V »^y* • * «>1 - *«...’ •tM4 mmmi■SSI > 1 1 1? •a. • >;‘‘ A • • • 9 . A •• V'• ,Jj;- • •••• 1m • •>• • -fr iJ; A -m MAUf — LAST.fIRSIr.MioiaiCA^AlOfl %v>*' ■y‘*.'4*'y i HL* • L L 1. •— J I 1\/e'fel # 5 • t 0 • «v y\1 •:**.v A % ‘•4» •i r*< j r *«[Hie SiISO ii ry -.* , 1 •i^V • .. •:>o •X W ’ ii -VV ■ v: ’4i i ^ • :s; Witt. ^UA/. TT" tiV r:.*4 • SJi r, • •••»:.•. A 11 r-. ■m • . • • • * • • - :. ••• • • I * *.r .' • ••* • . > •• •• •, * .• . * :• •. •• • • . . ‘V*.. I • ,»• u I •• • .. •• • .* : .1 • • • • . • - •• • »«r. L;.* • •^1 • I •l-'.i I *•.•I • I •* *.• • « it- • I'-. •• ••.. • it-;. >•:•••' . . • • .*• ....... « . • • * , • • ••• *. . •*•• • • . • • ••* I t • • .• • I • - • :... .V .• ?irlLiL:] trri llJ__I I • m i"1+\\ ACIIVITV I I *M .«c«l • . • ■ I I ... • • A ttt lin ’ 'r •' , • ' • •*.* • •* I".'. •>*:•••»• . *■ • gApoi Mnuetw •r*. OWMCIMHW ^ « • •• % . T21 t^.r#I , - , • •. . . : • r .*v «.•*.•! ’ - • • • ■ • .*.*/. •/ ■. •. .. *. II YOU fall 10 fcspond lo Ihls cluilon within 7 dayf, Incffised panallitt will ^ assessed and a warfani may ba Issued lor your arrasl. M a wiffanl Is Issued. • I *i W .'.V‘• • *•••■•• f • .*.*• •W‘. •. • ^ •. . . • ••: ••»■;••’••** *• * ’ *• •• ^ . m f . ^ . S A .•, • • • P IL) r V ••rv *• *4i<r ••5 1 1— -V V « •6 t:lb lA ' T A 'V r*i.i rv ;v'>•-V • ;. N. . 1— •0 'T Lk e .T* • • il'iv(*4 St v'f S !h Q V (L e • *• VI ■F.m '• i- £L if T ri • #•» ^ »•# V:.‘ t *•»p i»T,)0 i'"f'fh •. • * • • • • t • •• • I uuxaa •• • CITY DF OFDNOD CITY of ORONO p„. OHi- 66-CO-.U1 B.,. S5323.M««dp.l Offio- On (A« Wor(A Shore of Lake Minnetonka February 2, 1989 Mr. Garry Everson ^ 4755 North Shore Drive Moundf MN 55364 Re:Deck Construction Without Permit Dear Mr. Everson, The Building and construct new decks application for an decks. A review of the IppliVaVi^ lindVtha^-the followin, information needed for review is missing: certificate of survey. The se=k= =°nstru^ed are^ ^Lp\\%^:?c%''Van^"o^nly^\^e“Sird'rhfou,h a certificate of survey. , i^i-eonc: This deck construction is2. Hardcover calculations. T. insoection of your considered as ‘'atccover, and e already ptooerty indicated .hat j-he 25% in the 75-250 Lceeds the ha-d'cover calculation worksheet zone. Please the su'vev. your surveyor should rotatfail ftVms^irhardfove?: fn^luain, the deck, sidewalks, driveway, etc. on the survey. in the event that hardcove^constructed decks exceeds the allo^a 0 75, event that any P°^Vo" „ou will have to apply for the lakeshore setback ^ ^i^sing a variance for your use,appropriate variances. I am enclosing ’should you need to apply* Review of your building plovlTe^the unti^the noted it®"%fhln'1l%7ys =f the afte of this letter ”?l^”suiV'ln'rrhS«r''al‘of"th!s Jtter to the City Attorney. BUILDING & ZONING - 473*7337 assessing DMINISTRATION a finance - 473-7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 • • Mr. Garry Everson February 2, 1989 Page 2 ^ a7‘3-73S7 if you have any questions.Please contact me at 473-/jo/ it ^ ^ AssistantPlanning & Zoning Administrator MPG/dh Enclosure: Variance Application Lyle Oraait/ Field Inspector !lA-n’j»’ ,v *.tn:.r-rr <- ■•T^Ttirr—rr. -rr - r- ■ Total Fee: $ city of ORONO - BOILDING PERMIT APPLICATIOH Date Received: "hO Date Accroved: - »s** Permit#:Project#:r V' 2. mied =ut C=.pleteiy and signed 2 sets of construction plans to include the following: a) Floor plams; b) Footing and foundation plan; c) Elevations (of all sides); d) Wall sections and cross sections; ei Details - stairs and any special connections. Certificate of survey with location of existing and proposed strictures including hardcover calculations and grading and drainage plans as required. Energy calculations - form provided. *BOVB^iNPOB«MION*MO^^^ 8?^ SDslimm M InU^S^ORE PLAH REVIEW HILL BE STARTED 4. THE APPLICANT IS: (circle one) CoWNSR^br CONTRACTOR JOB SITE ADDRESS: ^7.55* •Shc^r^l___I —ZIP NAME OP OWNER; C^iXOO i ! 1-t.i rSrPJ. (work) PHONE: (home) -'n MAILING annPRSS: A ’ CITY; Ki- ZIP; T contractor: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _phone:- - - - - - - - - - - MAILING ADDRESS:CITY:ZIP: ARCHITECT:PHONE: MAILING ADDRESS:ZIP: AdditionTYPE OP WORK: New_ _ Demo Remodei/Alteration MoveAccessory Structure_ _ Renovate ^ Land Alteration PROPOSED USE (describe in detail); j) 3 C) In f^huTlCi /^JJLJ l i-’~ront Uj<3.ilU^cj^ , STORIES: PamhIfrSQ. FEET OP EACH FLOOR:,/---------------- NO. OP REDROOMSi GARAGE .STALLS: ATT.^^__ DET. ESTIMATED CONSTROCTION VALUATION (excj^i^^g^and) ; S—/- - I hereby apply for a building permit and I acknowledge that J;”5with^the ibov^is complete and accurate; that the work wil ) be in ordinances and codes of the City and with the Scn^« f°‘iVmit- and understand this is not a permit and work is not to start without a permi . that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE 5:^1^ C r" ^ - - - _ _ *(Please £jL11 o;titl^J:iie‘reverse side of tihrs •.ormj — DATE: / f i ^ . .. I* • V. 4 , CITYOFORONO INSPECTION NOTICE PERMIT NO.^_______ called in SCHEDULED COMPLETED DATE TtME IlL )4r ►*=j'csO ADDRESS OWNER it! 5 Q c § I Oto TELEPHONE NO. O FOOTING a FRAMING Q INSULATION D WALL BO. C FIN/L C PROGRESS □ DEMOL O FIRE PREV. AJc) fOC PrU4>f^O/^ CONTR. □ PLUMBING Rl- o plumbing final □ MECHANICAL D WATER HOOKUP C meter SET/TUHN ON O SEWER HOOKUP C SEPTIC INSTALL C SEPTIC MAINT. C WELL TEST PUMP ^SjC site inspection 'a EXCAVyCRADINOy'FlLLING lakeshorewetlanos LICENSING COMPLAINT FOLLOW-UP SEPTIC final FIREPLACE/WOOD BURNER □ a a oa□o COMMENTS; CeC,K---- J \T<vc,^ A)g"uJ C Ai V ts ______________ § O 5:ou- Uj ii 5 Uj5 5o Uj cs: Uj Q O CJ ..-'TT4- ~7 0»Am-^ c PHOTO takenz WORK SATtSFACTORV PROCEED = ^§S«CT W§S< c IlTfoI'rE.NSPECTION before COVERING 5 mSSIct Sfe condition within hours inspector will return . ,^TOP ORDER POSTED. CALL INSPECTOR ^^?INSPECTI0N REOUIRED. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS call for the next Inspection 24 hours in advance, Owner/Contiu. on site Inspector 473-7357 White /Intptciof'f Filf Carurjr /Site Noticf CITY of ORONO city :Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, MinnesoU 55323 • Municipal Offices OF QRawa On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka October 31r 1988 Gary Iverson 4755 North Shore Drive Mound, MN 55364 Deck Construction Without Pemrt Dear Mr. Iverson: « o 91 1988 this office notified you that a peraiiw On OCwOber . r^nns^-'-uc*--'on. You resoonded with a note was required for and you were not aware of saying it was a repai- and *•.. letter is to conform the requirement for a New work or 3^pLls":jrj^eet"tre""n^ni;°u; November 8, 1988 or the City may issue citations. 1£ you have any ouestions or if you have a problem meeting this Lalune? pleas'e feel free to contact me at my office. Sincerely, Vv-Ct' LyW Oman, Field Inspector ?homas J. Jacobs, Senior Building Inspector building k ZONING - 473-7337 assessing administration k FINANCE - 473-7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 r %• •• • I* • t . f » - 'r i:''- '-f , CITY OF aRQNCJ^y CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay. MinnesoU 55323• Municipal Offices f On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka October 21# 1988 Gary Everson 4755 North Shore Drive Mound/ MN 55364 Re; Deck Construction Without Permit Dear Mr. Everson; havewithout the required building permit. required® foraUk'const^ permit be$.95® ^ Questions or if you have i problem meeting this deadline please teex my office. Sincerely/ Lyle Oman/ Field Inspector Enclosed; Permit Application ThomH J. JacoDS, Senior Building Inspector "ths- uoork. uoc. di^ ^ UJCLS repair ^ '3' n^nt3v^naiu>e- uoejr^. met- -trus A a • • inLDINC a ZONING - 473-7357 assessing I hetPilc L ou , administration a finance - 473-7358 • PfBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 Fron: Date Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator August 15, 1990 n Subject: #1580 Patricia Plant, 2245 Watertown Road - Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) - Front street setback variance required for proposed 1/2 bath and closet addition to west side of existing residence. Required = 50' Existing « 26' Proposed *= 30' Variance =20' or 40% List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit A-1 - Applicant's Addendum Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Floor Plan Exhibit E - Elevation Exhibit F - Septic Map Exhibit G - Survey Review of Application - Please review Exhibit A-1, the applicant's addendum which reviews the unique history of the house, the needs for the addition and the hardships. The property consists of a total of 4.3 acres with a wetland area just under 2 acres. The house was placed on the property prior to current zoning. Although the property line runs to the center of Watertown Road, the 33' of right-of-way places the existing house (northeast addition) approximately 26' from the dedicated right- of-way and approximately 36' from the traveled roadway of Watertown Road. The west side addition at it's widest point is located approximately 30' from the front street lot line and as it moves westward it decreases to approximately 34'. The addition will have no impact on the existing drainfield that serves the residence nor will the bathroom require an upgrade of the existing septic system. The hardships listed in the applicant's addendum are as follows: 1. House placed on property prior to current zoning standards. House placed on property in 1870. Zoning File #1580 August 15r 1990 Page 2 2. There is approximately 10' of additional unused area between the traveled roadway of Watertown Road and the front street lot line. 3. There is a 20* high buckhorn hedge obscuring the view of the proposed addition from the roadway. 4. The existing house meets all required side setbacks in it's present location and so will the proposed addition. 5. The property consists of 4.3 acres of land. €. None of the neighbors notified for this variance application have submitted negative comments to the City. Options of Action Approva 1 - If approved# the Planning Commission may consider the findings and hardships noted above. Denial - If denied# please refer to the necessary findings in Section 10.28# Subdivision 3 (A). Isv Or 1^ CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION * Initial Application Fee ($50.00 per each addit^ona^variafl^L ^ Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 Jg (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) /, /4- V. 1.1 ' •V* f.j I I W*i t.*#\unu*c viiMvr ’mrr I,. J. Itrijy fc- Ul I AWri. 1 7* 1 1 Vf .1 JrVw» 1A wc v«;. wv nv rr.i \/JL out rL?T>k‘ 1 f w/ • W PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ^2.^6 n. ir5.o? I-ECEIFT-THM YOU * t C"’ rfcj'i “!*'»*» 1 r.ni Ti /}• Jj5rauunov uvv^ nvi Rr7 '.V /V P.C'/^D o7/"J/Oij V I / /V Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Phone (home) *'• -~7T Name Mlx’ti'SVRL /PamiCiflN PLi'^NT Phone (work) — ■ ■_ _ _ _ Address: PD 'i /&_ _ _ _ _ _ Citv^LVh'l!’ Lfy^S— Zip; OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) \ 1^1 iv( Phone (worJc) Kdcitv;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Zip: Name n i-i t'AT'S'i i' Ate^^r__ _ _ _. Date Property Acquired J P/ ^ O (month/year) I (do) () also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District — \ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Use of Property R <; i ■"! P * .'T'I A 'Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: Estimated Construction Cost $. VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setbac)c Variances ( Front Side Rear) Other . ( HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: 7'i f . C Al^ t IT//A'Q 'ncij;fL hf^.RCd> A>\' DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ '_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list,from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 2. 3. 4. p'4;j3-32Tn t \ /k 6. 7. 8. ^at Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. S)cetches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. you ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not coaplete if the above infomation has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete Initialed by Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses inci/red in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Icnowledge. 0 P' ’CDApplicant's Signature 4 frT Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby aclcowledges and agrees to this application and further Aiuthorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, -a^nts. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga- and verification of this request. DateOwner's Signature V6X VA (XCL Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning- Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled rev ■ ““W meetings of the Planning Commission and CouneijL. If an applicant is u..ab. to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an aut'>ox..zed agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning 0fi-.ee of this change prior to the meeting. i /T' i ' l^tvjnifil.->wi?^a>b Hadsh (970.5"^ t’ttH S'S/jflifcS’J.. j, HoRr ^ OA ORie,.-to b«y(<L U.i^ ''-bA se^-o/'i>' H!,e.W^ea.^u.'..^R<5AD Wcl^ p«tba.b^ UTi^iA \^CQM^"HiaJL\. ^ ifu^SC clii^i) but OS ' ch Cj ouAcUf^ Huiu-v^ cU’s«^4T'^.t Ro.ti, ^ <RR^i.a- -Htt .V^R-tincA^^ Coab^<v 05-H,:,' -Huhi U a.-2^^^ h c<?<je. r •T’c-fccr'/Uxy^ +2oz> F^'z^tt to. Q/U^ <x 2.<^' XT.^' ^Wd\o Cv\ \^i J3'1H Nontn IrAsi i’’\clc ■{» T^ CLOiL- Ol. Cj ^OrifCx ^ flt-i| p^fV^Ti-^cf” P'31 I'H Wv^tl ''Vwv.^Lcriil; o^vti.$ Ho .Ool' fTTcfl dt:-. c t/l'.Vl ^>>4 tit' 0 ' • ‘t5i^< pO^;><5S<^ 6li4 ’ihi:A lA-it? hi Ia'ciujC^ CLU^ A^6:|>ti.CriC'U^' 1 \'5 ”‘ .TV»s lod»'h,<VyVtP^ U^a^S ^f/\(]Vi£<ac)AtTL^i- bi ib^ x^ ^ v ^ fra WtX«, OUT XS' I' ^ ,^^- >^U bt aV?t -b -W '^:u-tii-u.'£c, C51( IV. VUCUU■|€'^^A cC I-'X O uk J nrT I y • ••. I "j RUN DATE 07/27/90 * BATCH 001 PROP ADDR OHNER NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR ONNER NANE TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NANE TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OltlER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER HMB TAXPAYER . NAT^ADDR HENNEPIN COUITY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST IB 0S-117-2S 21 000^ 021B5 HATERTONN RD H J OTTO ET AL HEINZ J OTTO 2185 HATERTONN RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 22 0001 02255 HATERTONN RD PATRICIA G PLANT ET AL PATRICIA G PLANT BOX 376 2295 HATERTONN RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 22 0016 02280 DEVIN LA GEORGE A JACKSON ET AL GEORGE A I JANE L JACKSON 2280 DEVIN LANE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 22 0022 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED KELLEY A KELLEY INC PATRICIA G PLANT BOX 376 2295 HATERTONN RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 39-118-23 33 0008 02280 HATERTONN RD M QUAMMEN ETAL MILFORD QUAMMEN 2280 H HATERTONN RD LCiNG LAKE MINN 55356 72 39-118-23 33 0091 00050 HARRINGTON OR R M i C 8 DAYTON RALPH M DAYTON 50 HARRINGT0I4 DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 21 0011 02200 DEVIN LA T A S MAJOR THOMAS S A SUSAN B MAJOR 2200 DEVIN LA L0f4G LAKE MT4 55356 38 03-117-23 22 0002 00036 ADDRESS U4ASSIGNED PATRICIA G PLANT ET AL PATRICIA 6 PLA^f^ BOX 376 2295 HATERTONN RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 22 0017 02290 DEVIN LA B D CHILDS A A S CHILDS D D CHILDS A A S CHILDS 2290 DEVIN LA L0T4G LAKE MN 55356 38 39-118-23 39 0082 00038 ADDRESS UTMSSIGNED JEFFREY P STEBBINS JEFFREY P STEBDIf4S 330 S HALKER HAYZATA MN 55391 72 39-118-23 33 0009 02260 HATERTONN RO HOWARD STARK ETAL HOWARD STARK 2260 NATERT0Hr4 RD LONG LAKE MINN 55356 72 39-116-23 33 0053 02206 NATERTOHri RO 00rt4 A STINSON ETAL D0f4N STINS0T4 BOX 100 L0T4G LAKE MN 55356 REPORT NO. PI935901 PAGE 1 38 03-117-23 21 0023 02165 HATERT0I4N RD JEFFREY P STEBBINS JEFFREY P STEBBINS 330 S HALKER HAYZATA MN 55391 38 03-117-23 22 0015 02325 HATERTONN RO KELLEY A KELLEY INC KELLEY A KELLEY I44C S HATERTONN RD L0T4G LAKE MN 55356 I I f “ tiV. I -r 38 03-117-23 22 0021 00038 ADDRESS UT4ASSIGNED GEORGE A JACKSON CONST ET AL PATRICIA G PLANT BOX 376 2295 HATERTONN RO L044G LAKE MT4 55356 . r A .1 72 34-118-23 33 0006 02296 HATERTONN RO M J A L A CASHNORE MICHAEL J CASHNORE 2296 HATERTONN ROAD LONG LAKE MN SS3S6 72 34-118-23 33 0010 00065 HARRINGTON DR CLIFFORD A HALE CLIFFORD A HALE 65 NO HARINGTGN OR L0»4G LAKE MN 55356 72 34-118-23 34 0011 02175 FIATERTOFM RO COMSTA^CE L LARSON CONSTANCE L LARSON 2175 NEST HATERTONN RO LONG LAKE MINN 55356 I .. .. .. til r. irf«:^ / i RUN DAT€ 07/27/90 BATCH 001 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0FIT4ERS LIST PROP ADDR OHNER NAiiE TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 72 39-118-23 39 0013 02167 HATERTOFtI RD BETTY A KOTALIK BETTY A KOTALIK 2167 HATERTONN RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 72 39-11B-23 00016 NEST M J BRAUER A J K MARTIN J A JULIE 16 NESTHOOO DR S LONG LAKE HN 55356 0026 DR BRAUER K BRAUER PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR TOTAL BATCH 001 00029 72 39-118-23 39 0023 00007 HESTHOOD DR VIOLA G KEM4A ET AL H/L EST VIOLA 6 KEMNA 7 HESTHOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 39-118-23 39 0099 00057 IfK^LEHOOD ST B A EFFERTZ ETAL BERNARD EFFERTZ 5V IN'^fFHOOD STREET uJfiii lAf L 55356 REPORT NO. PI935901 PAGE 2 72 39-118-23 39 0029 U0012 HESTHOOD DR F A POISSON APR POISSON FREDERICK A PATRICIA POISSON 12 HESTHOOD DR LOrKS LAKE m 55356 72 39-118-23 39 0059 00058 INGLEHOOD ST S R MASON A J E MASON STANLEY R MASON 5997 BREEZY RD M0UT4D MN 55369 ‘ ir f • Tl! r \ m J r•• I •% I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATIOTJ OF If»F0RMATI0»4 AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEFAIEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION. TO THE BEST OF HY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE J ' V; RKOR 1 >1 INSPECTION RECORD PUMPOUT RECORD DATE COMPLIANCE DATE GALLONS /a~z2'£tZ . AJoTvr> j ScJZ\ St^/CAAce OK tK^n^.■r|/•ce OAa..^ €>\J( TL^rT^ /AJ y^/fe . AJU SirZuA^^ y^to SltRfACfMG____________1=^ C - CONFORMirjG S - SUB31ANDAHD f4 - NONCONFORMING To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson It Fr<MB: Date: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator August 14, 1990 Subject: #1581 Robert Koehnen, 537 Hanlon Avenue - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-IB, Single family rural residential, 2 acre, unsewered Application - Request for front setback variance to construct attached deck and gazebo. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Plan View Front Elevation View Lot Coverage Calculation Pertinent Facts - 1.Applicant proposes to construct a deck and gazebo on the south side of his house. The existing house is 22.1’ from the street lot line, where a 50' front setback is normally required. The proposed deck will be constructed at the main floor level of the house, which, due to topography, becomes an upper level deck as it gets further from the house. Because the deck needs railings for its entire length and width, it is subject to the setback requirements. 2.Existing house setback to street = 22.1' Proposed deck to street setback = 17' Proposed gazebo to street setback = 33' 3.Including the house, two garages, and the gazebo and deck portions with railings exceeding 6' above grade, proposed lot coverage is 15.35%, about 70 square feet over the 15% lot coverage limitation. Discussion - The applicants have made a number of improvements to this property over the last 5 years, including construction of a detached storage garage and addition to the existing residence. The current proposal is to construct a deck at the south end of the house with a free standing gazebo locat^'d on top of the deck. \ Zoning File #1581 August 14, 1990 Page 2 of 2 This house is slightly angled on the lot, such that additions in line with the existing house heading southward tend to get closer to the front lot line. Also, the proposed deck on the street side is a walkway from the main front door to get to the deck as the grade drops. A variance was granted in 1987 for the existing room addition at the south end of the house. Save for the 4' walkway, the proposed decks and gazebo just extend that house further to the south. This residence is at the end of the pa\^ed area of Hanlon Avenue. The proposed deck and gazebo should have a relatively slight impact on the perception of density in the neighborhood. The request for the small lot coverage variance is. of course, related to the size of the lot. To avoid a variance, applicants would have to redesign the proposed deck to eliminate 70 s.f. While this might be possible, it might result in a totally revised configuration to still accommodate the gazebo and stairway to the rear. Staff Recommendation - If Planning Commission feels that the proposed front setback variance will not tend to be out of character with the neighborhood, a recommendation for approval could be based on the hardship of the location of the existing house. Note that even decks to the rear of the house would require a front setback variance, because the rear of the house is less than 50' from the street. Likewise, if Planning Commission feels that the proposed deck and gazebo will not have an impact on the visual density of the neighborhood, then a lot coverage setback variance approval recommendation would be in order. ti ■ ■ ' CITX OP OROHO - VMtIAMCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address £37 hldytcfj^ Illl/U Property Identification Number (P •j J cm OF OFSSOr-rrrrrI aivr?in.u L*i f 01 iSI -175.00 T n ) n;i~inTi 175.. I. D. J Ilf ------ iitCEIf’T- ?«■ rW Cc’yi .wi 07/27/90 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name QiUwii ^ Phone (home) 'AS^3 Phone (worJc) lOa.'rrUX Address: 5^37 Aj)g!City: Zip; >553^ / Phone (home) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property IV C.C Lit/Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ '1^000 Describe request in detail: ^1~C.l<(l4Ui^^ 15^^^ ti_ VARIANCES REQUIRED _ _ _ Lot Area Setback Variances ( _ _ Lot Width v/" Front _ _ Hardcover Side Rear) Other • V hardship Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: -- -SZZl--------- - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DESCRIPTION OF DNUSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions prev^ting compliancy witlj Zoning Code Requirements; fn J-^t^ f‘ Oui-rft »< - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - --- - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. 5# Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. S)cetches or plans of floor and elevation views. Im As an addendum to this application^ please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCCMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the_ infonaation has not been included. _ mm mm mm mm • * m ^m mm mm mm ^m mm mm mm ^m mm^m m-9 mm mm mm mm mm mm mm ^m mm m • mm mm ^m mm mm ^m mm mm mm ^m ^m mm ^m ^m ^m ^m Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff; _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ mm ^m ^ mm mm ^ ^ mm mm mm tm mm ^ ^ ** ** ^ ^ ^ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature n .>'7 Jj^jfhyrULy^Date -7-a“)-9C ONNBRS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date 1 ~ 2-1 ~^0 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 961 ^ f / / • « J J ‘ !M < m ?2 ^ir^T 'e»*53* lyf .xr^ 83 '*•’5 S •58 3 04 04 ^9 lot »5. BLOCK 12 UI^TOtCA BLUFFS DICKENSON 5 s 96L14 "(is?•^48 _ (n) t s r'",.I c ' v(14) ^ a ;i ^l/‘A' ** (46) i‘ » '9 Q ■• ^ fn)N ^ S 2\ (22) \ • 5 ( '65 ' fl\:»• “ (7»)w » s( '75 i " (20)s ’« ■ a" V *9)• " S• fl«5 ^ a' ^ *’ •>« jn 4 Ji» ■ ^ t.'S ^!» <• - N ' * * (^) N 2 5 (27) ^ ’ K 5 si—•' 1 ^ SH37i' •’ *• '•/ 4 : ? 1 ’,,’, 4 Q 'Sl * (?6) •6 ? *7 >i ? * (S) ■(A) ^31) ' . ’«,« 3 ^(^ a "(3g) i a i tc'S 48 ’ a •• ”•'4«)i{40) ' •. O J > ’ s < • 7J% 4 n S 4^ . 90t lM *C0R TO «OM n.At RUN DATE 07/24/90 BATCH 002 PROP ADOR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/AODR PROP ADOR 0HT4ER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP AODR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADOR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP AOOR 0Nr4ER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/#OOR PROP ADOR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAH£/AODR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY ONNERS LIST SB 02-117-23 31 0013 00500 HANLON AVE I A H BERGSAGEL DANIEL H FLEISCHHAN 500 HANLON AVE NAYZATA HN 55391 38 02-117-23 31 0016 00565 HANLON AVE GAIL L GRZESKONIAK NILFRIED A JUDY HOYER 565 HANLON AVE NAYZATA HN 55391 002138 02-117-23 31 01300 FOX ST STATE LAND DEPT DRAPER H A HOLLY B JAFFRAY 540 BARRETT AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 38 02-117-23 31 0026 00038 ADORESS UNASSIGNED STATE LAND DEPT STATE LAND DEPT ADJACENT ONNER ONLY 38 02-117-23 31 0034 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF ORONO DRAINAGE A CONSERVATION 2-10-89 ST DEED il71093 38 02-117-23 31 0037 00530 HANI ON AVE N A L THIES BILL A LUCY THIES 530 HANLON AVE NAYZATA HN 55391 38 02-117-23 31 0014 00521 HANLON AVE RICK S HILLER ET AL RICK S HILLER AND KATHRYN E STENSO MILLER 521 HANLON AVE NAYZATA M^4 55391 38 02-117-23 31 0017 00038 ADDRESS UfMSSIGNED GAIL L GRZESKONIAK GAIL L GRZESKONIAK 4820 N 39TH ST ST LOUIS PARK MN 5^416 38 02-117-25 31 0022 00540 BARRETT AVE D M JAFFRAY AMD JAFFRAY DRAPER M JAFFRAY 540 BARRETT AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 38 02-117-23 31 0028 00539 KEENE AVE 0 HARALO ERIKSEN 0 HARALO ERIKSEN 6219 ZEALAND AVE N MPLS MN 55428 38 02-117-23 31 0035 00036 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO T A A G H FTSCHER THEODORE 1 GERTRUDE FISCHER 2034 COMMERCE BLVO Mourm m 55364 38 02-117-23 31 0058 00520 HANLON AVE RAMOTil M SLEOZ GERHARD D TAfiGER 10043 PIILSBURY AVE BLOO«ilNGTON MT4 55420 REPORT NO. PI43540I PAGE 3 38 02-117-23 31 0015 00537 HANLON AVE R V A H E K0EHf4EN ROBERT A MICHEL KOEHNEN 537 HANL0f4 AVE NAYZATA M4 55391 38 02-117-23 31 0018 01300 FOX ST R A K TSCHIDA ROBERT 6 TSCHIDA 1300 FOX ST NAYZATA MT4 55391 38 02-117-23 31 6023 00540 PAi.RETT AVE n li JAFFRAY A M B JAFFRAY DRAPER M JAFFRAY 54U BARRETT AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 38 02-117-23 31 0033 00033 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CEDRIC OETTLOFF CEDRIC OETTLOFF 1255 DICKEf4SOf4 ST NAYZATA HI4 551^1 38 02-117-23 31 0036 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED T A A G A FISCHER THEODORE A GERTRUDE FISCHER 2034 COIfflERCE BLVO , M0UI4D MT4 55364 38 02-117-23 31 0039 01295 DICKENSON ST N F SCHMIDT A K H SCHHIDT HILLIAM S KARRINE SCHHIDT 12^5 OICKENSOri ST NAYZATA M4 55391 i .1 1 i ^ A \i i . ‘.j RUN DATE 07/2A/90 BATCH 002 PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OI#4ERS LIST REPORT rX). PI43540I PAGE 4 38 02-117-23 31 0046 00540 BARRETT AVE 0 H JAFFRAY I M B JAFFRAY DRAPER H JAFFRAY 540 BARRETT AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 GO TOTAL BATCH 002 00019 ■i I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS RLPRESENTEO ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATIOt« OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE tlEt«u;PIN C0U4TY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY .TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY KfTOHLEOGE AND BELIEF. , AMiP.DATE OPERTY TAXATia tfi i/p^ Prepared for t lii ui? &unvjcix i’obert Km;lnuMi > K.\ r: l-U o •~J < LEGAL i)ESCKri*T10N: Lots 4, 5 cmd 6, blork 14, f! I uriKTONKA m.UFES, according t.o the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. \% ,1 1 GENERAL NOTES Denotes iron monument Denotes cross chiseled in concrete Denotes existing spot elevation Denotes proposed spot elevotion Denotes surface drainage Dashed contour lines denotes proposed features Solid contour lines denotes existing features Proposed top of foundation elevation Proposed basement floor elevation Proposed garage floor elevation " BENCHMARK: ALL-METRO LAND SURVEYORS 23^10 Daniels Street Long Lako, Minnesota 55356 I hffiby ciftify that this lurvty, plon or rtporf eeos proporod by fnt of unde» triy dirsct supervision end that 1 om a du’y Hsgistcred Lond Survtyor under the laves of < he State of M.nnesut** ' '/ ' / ^ r (y •/ /. DAT F HEG NO V:' SCALE / '• • Vp ' BOOK FACE 3 file no H.!:/ A i ! I t — c I I I I . - ^ Ti o > I ^ \ I ESija.»i jiii.f^t._j ....... o %. .T , i a__ _T- :^£dai-ih^^OC. i 1I ^ - ':3 ~'.:>:vv:rl^ . ! ' ! : 1 : ' ! ! ; ; 1 1 ! i t I I -r- - ; : ' i i FT ■ • 1 i 1 i i i ‘ ♦ 1 T-— -r--r— t I I < I I ! I T-* I i I ( » ■ ■ ^ i I “ 11 « 1 1 1 1 1 ! ‘ i -./W. J-^r ►i 1 1 l iX,. { 'i ! 1 i ;1«1 » C ()0 •J ~ 1 » -------------- -1- , Mt'*' ' ”-1 . 1 i . « ' 1 1 * 1 < I !\ • I !1------rI \1 » i 1 ; i 1 1 l (' 1 f 1 4w ------1 1 1 i * t t • 1 i i [ ! I ' • • Ca\j** L/^u.\^2-7.7r A- zznz )U >: i5,7r \ /i>35sao U> ^T". I ^e*T. ^ ZOJ ^2^.2- 30 Pf 22> PeCfcii/<iMA 2^£0 (^ focrio^^s > (a '4^ove /2,^ y.s* /^A/S ia> l^r A^A ' ^1 5/. ^90 >1 &‘i c. SViJ ^V \ \ 2-/^- / 80 / ^<^77 i/. * r Cor (!!x»/wu<rt» tr/tnrr^i^ =2Vi^ =7j- ' U.L V? , _. -- /r. 3 To:Planning Conunission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson n From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:August 16, 1990 Subject: #1582 Carol Burgess, 2800 Pheasant Road Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IB, Single family lakeshore residential, 1 acre, sewered Application - Request for hardcover and average setback variance to construct deck and porch additions to the existing residence, lot. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - h - Pertinent Facts Application Letter of Request Plat Map Property Owner List Survey Construction Plans Hardcover Calculations 1.This is a unique property abutted by the lake on one side and a lagoon on the other. Because of this, about 3/4 of the 2 dry buildable acres are in the 0-75' zone. 2.0-75' hardcover = 7.06%. (no additional hardcover proposed) 75-250' hardcover = 35.5%. Proposed hardcover increase in 75-250' zone = 114 s.f. (0.5%) Final proposed 75-250' hardcover = 36.0%. 3.The applicant's contractor notes that there are no areas readily available'to return to green space. Staff would question however whether there are areas of rock and plastic that can be removed. The hardcover calculations show approximately 900 s.f. of rock and plastic at the northwest side of the house, and similar areas along the southerly lakeshore side of the house in the 0-75' zone. 4.Because this house is on a peninsula, the average lakeshore setback line is not even within the property boundaries (see air photos). The proposed additions are no nearer the shoreline than the normally affected residence, which is directly to the west. Zoning File #1582 August 16, 1990 Page 2 Discussion Regarding the average lakeshore setback, any construction on this lot technically does not meet the strict interpretation of the average setback ordinance. The key point is that the neighbor to the immediate west will not have significant lakeviews affected by these additions. Both the proposed deck to the east side and the proposed porch addition to the west side are designed to meet the 75' minimum lakeshore setback. Hardcover increases associated with the porch are 78 s.f. The 4' overhangs have not been included as hardcover. On the east end, the decks comprise an additional 36 s.f. of hardcover where none exists now. As a point of reference, hardcover on the property overall is 11,619 s.f. or 13.3% of the entire lot. Staff RecoaoBendation A recommendation for approval of the average setback variance would be appropriate if Planning Commission finds that no views from neighboring adjacent lakeshore properties are encroached upon. Regarding the hardcover variance request, a consistent recommendation would be to approve the additions subject to removal of existing hardcover to result in no net increase, or even a net decrease on the property. Likely candidate areas for removal would be the rock beds underlined with plastic adjacent to the house. Isv I ... CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 (S50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) / i PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 2800 Pheasant Road Excelsior, MN 55331 Property Identification Nximber (P.I.D.) 21-117-23 32 0004------- r ^ rlnhNLt yii X VWVw VVWV 01 ISi 1?5.00 LhtCK Jl 1T5.60 Un i,EC£lPr-rmK YOUAttach legal description to application if not included on required survey. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (home) 471-9357APPLICANT Name Carol Burgess Phone (work) 624-0584 Address ; 2800 Pheasant Road CitV! Excelsior Zip: 55331 ‘'^'27/90 OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired June. 1967 (month/year) I ^do nojl) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) iiaiaDESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail:_____________________________________ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear) Other HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. S)cetches or plans of floor and elevation views. 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been includ^. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. / Applicant' a Signature^^ ^ /'t ly Date , /*/ OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this regt^st. Owner' s Signature ^Date , /*7*7<^ - - - - -—- - - - - - -- - -jzzririzzzrzzziizz Applicant must h^ve all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make a. -angements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ;i • • wc]r;; f&. r. tv f h- -^ <*■ * ■V 1^" Kn MEUn OONlfMKTIOII MC. HBOSHAOVWOOOHOAO / WAV1ATA.IIIN963M I PHONE:471-t3W PROJECT 8UHHARY for H8. CAROL BURGESS Thi» r«Qu»st is for sn incrssss in ths hsrdcovsr allcwad in ths 73*-230' zanm. This projsct has two parts. Pirat is a dsck to bs construttsd on ths East snd of ths houss. Ths sxlsting dsck is detsriorating badly providing both a Sinai1 unsafs dsck and potsntial problsms with watsr infiltrating via ths rotting Joists through ths stons vsnssr. Ths nsw dsck that has bssn dssignsd allows access to ths lowsr patio and incrsassa spacs for sntsrtaining that tns original dsck did net. Cara has bssn taksn to design tha nsn dsck almost complstsly over existing hardcover. Ths lower dsck would cover approximately 36 SF of existing grasnsaacs. Secondly is a porch to be constructed to the West snd of the houss. Ths spacs is to be used for casual sntsrtaining wtiich ths house is lacking. Ths 12' x 14' ^oom is a minimum size that saintains balance with ths massive architsctural features of ths hams. It would have a foundation to suooort rs—used stons vonssr but would be unhsatsd. Ths porch is located to rot sncrosch or. ths 0-75' zona as ths house already doss and is sited on an area that has 90 SF hardcover requiring additional hardcover of 78 3F. "N. Ths total Increase in hardcover would be 114 Sr, an of .3% to 36.00% hardcover. There are no areas readilv available to return to grsanapacs. Additional hardship is found in ths sits osing douols-frontso with water and ths resulting effect on the calculations. Thera is nearly three times ths total squads footage in ths 0-73' zone as there is in ths 73'-2S0' zone on this property. If ths square fcotags of the 73'-230' zone was rszalculatso witheut ths channel setback, the requested hardcover calculation wculd bes eiOi.7 SF / 42,300 SF (approx.) well under the allowed 23%. Thank you for your consideration. X 100 • 19.06% m:, i-, 'Vi 1 '••V. v;-,- - ^ ■' 'i A--. Iv •: V::4& ,'T. i• V • ■ v; ■ ' • . t. •• X"-- • : . t . . ■ ■ ‘ V . '' ' -'-A m V.. m. la'ihhil I I ik'i^l tfiiii I RUN DATE 07/30/9Q HENNEPIN CCi5 rr PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM r'ROPERTY OHMERS LIST REPORT NO. PI^35401 PAGE 3 i BATCH 002 PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 38 21-117-23 23 001^ 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED PHEASANT LANN HOMEOHNERS PHEASANT LANN HOHEONNERS 2760 PLEASANT RD EXCEiSIOR m 55331 36 21-117-23 23 0011. 02760 PHEASANT RD EOHARO M MAHONEY ETAl EDHARD M MAHOflEY 2760 PHEASANI ROAD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 31 0003 027^5 SHAOYHOOO RD JAMtS R HAUGEN JAMES R HAUGEN PO BOX 85 FARMINGTOr^ MN 55024 PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 21-117-23 32 0002 02795 PHEASANT RD ROYAL J DOSSETT I HIFE ROYAL A SYNNEVA DOSSETT 2795 PHEASAFfT ROAD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 32 0001 02799 PHEASANT RO ELMER J MARTINCOf4 ELMER J MARTINSON 2799 PHEASANT RD EXCELSIOR m 55331 0004 RO 38 21-117-23 32 02800 PHEASANT CAROL H BURGESS CAROL H BURGESS 2800 PHEASANT RO EXCELSIOR m 55331 PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR TOTAL BATCH 002 00006 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AT© TRUE nCPRESEI4TAT10N OF irJFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNIY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOMLEUGE MU) BELIEF, , ^ \ DATE .ff , f7fe( i( (\L ITT v« \ \ 1 1 1 1 - 1" ^ ---------------------------- •f * . /y - < 'O 7-3-70 • • HARDCOVER CALCULATIOH WORKSHEET SETBACK zone: (CIRCLE ONE) 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone • • A.Hous c ^7.V X = ZSS. f S.F. •• LENGTH WIDTH • • X • • • •mm •S.F. • X • • S.F. • • •• X • • • S.F. • X • S3 S.F. 3. C, Garage X • S.F. Driveway » * ' X •S.F. X • • • S.F. • • •/ D.. c Sidewalk 'X •S.F. X 3<x vet IIS.F. %X IS = in S.F. E.^ATIO/ Deck X Q • ' ‘ m -m ■ * • S.F. P.!ANDSCAP^ • X w = • /aV S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN 3Y 60 X S ’/ . 7 = 03SO . S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X s.r^• S.F. ^a.a\Ajafl 9^5 X >33 « 31%S.F. $ itdtujalK •f n. Othps 3 so y X X '2-5 / ttzS' s S.F. V ^ Total Hardcover IN Zone ?L37 /S.F. Total Property Area in Zone S.F. f : r-VrI s\y t CO n / -f i R I ^SOoo X 100 7. 06 % HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK zone: (crcle ONE) 0-75' (7^25^ 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone A, ' HO'I'!" ^X 2/, 5*r=*11^0. f S.F. length WIDTH £7. V X 2£. 7 “5 S.F. • X •• • S.F. •• • • • X • S.F. • X • S.F. n. Ga PA(^^X • S.F.^4* u r rial VPWAY X •..2 S.F. 4 X • • S.F. 1 . .1 'WT'» ■ • •• n. *srncwaiv' 'X MW 1 S.F. rj" •X _ 4 Z.Z. o S.F. >. y A /-Z.fG S.F. S>j.' i 1W-'-A tj E. ^ATIO/-- ^ATI^' Deck \ _ . L# ^ A rs ^ 'X L, - 3 4£3 <0? / Z€S.F. c 1 A*jn<:rAPP X /ri. L> zP'/c-i 21 ^ • 2. 1 S.F. areas UNDERLAIN av X 3/J-&S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X • 5^0 • S.F. • X Ml 4-2.S.F. • ft. flTfirP X S.F. • ■» Total Hardcover IN Z • ONE 79<T7. 7 S.F.A 1 Total P roperty A rea in Zone ^2.S.F.B a 7?S’7. 7 -L u• Z Z X 100" :% ' i-~ ■ -ri - - I I I ^ 1 . - . h'V'-r—• t *s_ i¥-«-«•*m^-i ■ r- * ^ —r- i ti: uu -r-rr-rf.vMMI k.ri. i r« « 'iHiiC ^i~ m i\ry : y^fK:i^ !i:SfSCy.-( ti iV-.i ' :’i .i^gfc^glj^vi i vV'iiQMd-lsifsK-.'#/- Mil SBP n- .^i :_ 4 :v.ii - '■ J ^•1*1 -ii •!rj [Am •••ii'-.-^,;Sp *'. *t.I 4 #; ' * V 5- • r i • * \i 1^B:. iVjC't 1 ilil r>7...,^-. - .7fft3/T sii ^v-^; To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: August 17, 1990 #1558 H. Richard Zuckman, 3995 North Shore Drive Subdivision/Sketch Plan Zoning District - LR-IC Total Area = 57,247 s.f. or 1.314 acres Pertinent Ordinances - 1. Section 10.25, Subdivision 4 (A) - In the LR-IC zoning district, detached dwelling units are encouraged in PRD developments. 2. Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) - LR-IC district requires 21,780 s.f. or .5 acres; proposed density = 14,311.75 s.f. or .33 acres per unit. 3. Section 10.32 - PRD ordinances. A) Specifically, Subdivision 2. LR-IC PRDs do not provide for additional units because of PRD development. The ordinance specifically says "dwelling units shall not exceed the number of such lots or units permissible under the minimum lot size requirements of the zoning district. B) Subdivision 3 - Council discretion "dwelling units may be, at the descretion of the Council and subject to the conditions set forth by the Council, in detached, attached or multi-family dwelling structures; subject to the limitations provided for in each zoning district." This section suggests that Council is the only body that may consider special requests for additional dwelling units but these additional units would be subject to all other pertinent limitations provided for in each zoning district. 4. Section 10.60, Subdivision 2 - Density. This specific section limits density to no greater than 4 dwelling units per acre no matter what density credit an application may seek (i.e. credit for wetlands in sewered areas, duplex, etc.). Zoning File #1558 August 11, 1990 Page 2 of 4 5.Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 Required = 75' - Lakeshore setback. A) Unit 3: Proposed Deck = 60' Variance =15* or 20% B) Unit 4: Proposed Deck 6 Portion of Residence Variance =18' or 24% = 57 List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Application Location Map Worksheet - Area Calculations Sketch of Existing Hardcover Existing Hardcover Fact Sheets Proposed Hardcover Fact Sheets Proposed Development Plan - PRD The applicant and owner of the Sandy Beach Resort, consisting of 7 cabins and additional accessory structures, proposes a 4 attached unit PRD of the 1.314 acre parcel. The applicant has provided hardcover facts providing an inventory of existing and proposed hardcover within the various setback areas as follows: A) 0-75' Setback Area = 11,880 s.f. (refer to Exhibits D s E 1-3) Allowed * 0 Existing ■ 1,187 s.f. or 9.99% Proposed = 526 s.f or 4.46% B) 75-250' Setback Area = 34,304 s.f. Existing = 10,530 s.f. or 30.7% Proposed = 15,709 s.f. or 45.8% C) 250-500' Setback Area » 11,063 s.f. Existing = 5,538 s.f. or 50.06% Proposed = 2,208 s.f. or 19.96% D) Total Existing Hardcover = 17,205 or 30% Total Proposed Hardcover = 18,443 s.f. or 32% Exhibit G, the proposed PRD development is difficult to read because of the superimposing over existing improvements. If members will just note that all new improvements are shown in the darkened blue line. In addition to the single attached residential 'structure, two accessory garage structures are proposed to the east side of the lot. The single access also remains at the east side of the lot. Zoning File #1558 August 17, 1990 Page 3 of 4 Staff would like to provide background on the current application proposed by Mr. Zuckman. The City staff has been in contact with Mr. Zuckman for the last year advising the owner to file a development/improvement project for the property, as the City staff was scheduled to commence hazard building action before the end of this year. The cabins are in a serious state of disrepair. In fact, in a earlier conditional use permit review all structural repairs of the cabins must be approved by the City. Guidelines were established that would prevent major structural improvements if required. It was the intent of the City to see this complex fade away. Staff would suggest it is, but I have a feeling Mr. Zuckman would disagree. Mr. Zuckman has exhibited good faith and has filed an application for a PRD of 4 units. It will be the Planning Commission's responsibility in this review to provide clear directions to the applicant so that he may prepare for the filing of the formal PRD. Staff has not really discussed the format of the PRD with Mr. Zuckman, but it would appear that we have a potential zero lot line dividion of residential units to be defined on the PRD as a lot for sale and conveyance to a future owner. The surrounding area will be shown as an open space outlet. It may be appropriate that the access road and turnaround be shown as a separate outlet, although this is not necessary. A shared dock area would also be located on the shoreline portion of the property within the open space outlet. Issues to be Resolved - 1. Encroachment of 75' setback area by new deve 1 opment. Planning Commission should provide clear direction to the applicant as to the City's long-standing position as to holding to the 75' setback line for new development. In earlier discussions with applicant's architect, staff was concerned that the 75' setback line was incorrectly designated, but in later reviews, staff would confirm the 75' setback line is correct as proposed. There is a reduction of existing hardcover in the 0-75' zone, shown in the hardcover facts noted above. Planning Commission must provide direction on this issue. 2. Density. Is a 4-unit attached dwelling realistic in light of the directives of the code noted above? Under the special discretion section staff can envision Council being persuaded to consider an increase in density over the allowed density based on the unique history and present intense use of the property. Out code does not provide for density credits based on performance standards under a PRD. Would Planning Commission recommend 4 units as applicant requests has proposed? Zoning File #1558 August 17r 1990 Page 4 of 4 The Planning Conunission must provide clear direction to the applicant on what is realistic in light of the code and previous actions by the Council. 3.Hardcover is excessive in the 75-250' setback area. If density is reduced, this may result in a decrease in the hardcover, although applicant and applicant's consultant has advised that the footprint would be proposed at the same size. Clearly applicant must make adjustments in the 75- 250' setback area. In addition, all hardcover within the 0- 75' setback area must be pulled behind the 75* setback line. 4.Riparian use. Based on the 152 lineal feet the LMCD code would allow 1 boat slip per footage. No matter what density is approved, would be allowed 3 slips only. The Sandy currently has 7 slips at a shared dock under of a joint use dock license. of shoreline, 50' of lineal a shared dock Beach Resort the authority 5.Access. In a formal subdivision application, the County will be asked to review the proposed location, although it would appear that we have clearly a less-intense use of the property. Unfortunately, I do not have elevations of the multi- residential unit proposed with the application. The architect did discuss preliminary sketches and elevations. Mr. Zuckman may be able to provide them at our meeting. • , CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISIOH APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION •Site Address____30^^ r4o<''tK Sho^fi I^rwiP ft Property Identiflcatio-. {F.I.O.) \1-\n-7.3 ZZ OOO^ Please check one - Property CITY OF DuOI^O abstract or torrens?rc UOFFICi rucri- ‘ft*’ urt Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT ^ ••• Phone (home) ^ T Name _________ Phone (work) 3~1~1‘“^QQQ m ir4^m , 06/21/K Address: lft\S I^Upon'V A n / S City: n^p\S>_____ Zip: 5SMQ5 ONNBR (if different than applicant) Phone (home)________________ Name Phone (work) Address: (attach list If more than one) City:Zip: EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size J Present Use (check) Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Existing Units New Units Total Units Units per Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ > <7 PLBTB PRBLHII1IART APPUCATIOS 2. 3. NIVIlfOM MATERIAL HBCBSSARY FOR CC 1. Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). ^ ^ ^As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list or any other persons you wish notified of this application.4. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature ________________________ - Date------------------------- 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I s II Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) $150.00 250.00 250.00 300.00 + 20.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* ■ ! The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City ..ttorney. Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature I c Date m Date Applicant must have all s\bmltta 1 V-^nto the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agen,t attend in your place and to advise the Building 4 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. )' -w • n r rw '-4/fiO i^innetonka APSA <r= O -75 tj:~i ■jr _ ^ \a 1% i AF^.75" - ' --vr :cM '.7s:'C'l (5 i:5.?xi« \\,i^c Sr = 34,50S.-r IP.» t ^ ^ ^ 14.504 ■ C? • ^<0N!£: )t7y.l45.g i4'z-i.7^ •Z- 140 P ii ^ m l(/35.^ 11^0 rbTW-MIJA 11,480 f 34,804 4 H,o'y5 ^‘^tflAr^ of i 1 I *TJ*^ - rutn f ■•. j»?r .« . J / H 4TI u iHl <« #S HAROCOVER CALCULATION MO MTBACK ZPNft (CWCtl 0«) 0-75* ExltTlNC H a ROCOVUI in foNI 11 250-500' LINOTN ^io Miont I I i If % . 3»(-'8U -fEPna It m SB ^6 21 i, 6anmc c. D nivikay X X iSxt 0. SlMVUUJ—i " m ><*L Dot*. 4*s *• KJi" ^V4.\ B} •V ijna t__ X ■3.^ X i.* ■ 41jc*<0 •»• c. Othu X X 6B ~na HITHas. 2£L • 1^ 9Z IX IT bo T7W \210. ToTAb Kmacovui in ZONt * Total PiwiNTY Aaia in Zon « \0, Sib .r* .9 .9, ,9, ,9, tr t .It tit .It •It tl. . I t^t ' .r. 9 ,9, • P9 tit .1. [3 ,9.Q [jji^sao_-f[Tpilf^ X100 • .y-ig •% r * T .*• . • # •««> ^ * 4 • •« ••••« • • r HARDCOVER CALCUtATIOII MORKSflCT ; SIT8ACK 20«*: (ctdCLi OMf) 0-75* 75-250* ExlSTtM Kmocovcr in ZoNf ^^^^^500-1000* A. House UUVTH mom X X X X I.R. #• I.P. S.P. I.p. 1. OMIMt c. D nivemat 9..StDCNAU( X X X X X t.p. S.Pt S.p. f.p« l.p. i-y *• ^ _30m ;_2>3:S. «•> ^Sl__i.p, ^ —2a^ . I » .. gj lAQ I«Ff p ^ S.P. t.Pi t. Omn i.p. Total Kmocovui in Zbkm • Total Pnopeaty Ania in Zone - Jl mssaft ^ -3 • • S ** • •* • * ' •• • .‘h** • * , •• •* V- .* I » \m ^ • to 7imr-^ ^ - • ~ I HARDCOVER CALCUUTIOfI WORKSHEET SciaACX ZONE: (circle one) 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' Existing H ardcover in Zone A. H ouse ^7/^ x "7^= '310 S.P. • •LENGTH WIDTH • X • • S.F, X • • S.F. •• X • ___ S.F, X • S.F. B. Garage _X • S.F, c. D riveway . • X ____S. r • X a • • S.F. D.. SIDEWALX X • S.F. X S.F. • X ^ ^= l‘U>S.F. E. ’at10/ D eck . ^ X &tt•S.F. i• p.Landscape • * X • a __ S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY X S»S.F, PLASTIC SHEETING X • • • • S.F. X a S.F.• • G. Other X 3 S.F. Total H ardcover in Zone - S.F. Q Total Property A rea in Zone 11.660 _ S.F. 0 © © -r ID 11 X IQO » 44^ % J HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SeTBACK ZONE! (CIRCLE OflE) 0-75’ (^5-25Q' Existing H ardcover in Zone 3 0 ___V 42- ...._ 250-500' 500-1000' a . ' H ouse LENGTH 30- WIDTH f'^‘1 ‘24'l -147 24) "4^7 B. Garage ______ -Zl ic? c. D riveway ___ If. nA ^ C4 X X X___\b V 3 .. ISX ■ r >: \o [5242^x__^ X ____ X ___ D.. Sidewalk ■zliA c) E. Patio / D eck -40b !1.) \ih F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY , . PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other X X X lJ'2MsO s.F. © s.F. Q) s.fV© _ S.F. ©9^79 S.F. ^1(P S-ZA- IcA nerL s.F. 135 • • s.F. ©©'LrO S\0 S.F. -fo6 © iijCC S,F. -rcA S.F.© 7^S.F.g) S.F. Total H ardcover in Zone I Total Property A rea in Zone , s.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. fX[ M^I^s.f. S 4i n X100 % HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' I 50-500^ 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone -•vl. fis A. House LENGTH WIDTH S t F • S.F. S.F. S.F. B. Garage { ^'2Aj-’^rO 01134.J y. 'to c. Driveway (^ x n ^0(a 4^ 4^:5.I S.F. D. Sidewalk S.F. S.F. E. Patio/ Deck S.F. S.F. F.Landscape areas underlain BY , . plastic SHEETING G. Other X X Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone S.F. S.F. ^^6 -ffTi X100 S.F. • S.F. S.F. S.F. 10 S.F.m % rs. To:Mayor Gzabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson c2/ From Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:August 16, 1990 Subject: #1583 Marco Franklin, Baldur Park Road Subdivision/Sketch Plan Review List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Application Plat Map Sketch Plan Designating Flood Plain and 75' Setback Impact on Building Envelope Cook Letter 8/15/90 Wetlands Map Original 20 Unit Proposal Hardcover Fact Sheet - Applicant Site Plan Preliminary Grading Plan Plat of Existing Lots - Total 12 1982 Preliminary Plan of 3 Lots Total Gross Lot Areas = 120,395 s.f. or 2,76 acres Area of Flood Plain (Area Below 931.5') = 60,113 s.f. or 1.38 acres Area Within 75' Setback Area = 76,217 s.f. or 1.75 acres Buildable Area at 75* Setback Line = 22,000 s.f. or .5 acres Pertinent Ordinances - 1.Section ID.25 - LR-IC Zoning District. Please review all lot standards. 2.Section 10,25, Subdivision 4 (A) - Conditional Use Permit for planned residential development. "This specific zoning district shall not be limited to detached single family structures." The current proposal proposes three single family detached residences. It is not clear whether a PRD is proposed or a plat. Certainly it would be to applicant's benefit to develop under a PRD based on restrictions of flood plain and the 75' setback area of the peninsula. (Refer to factual findings noted above.) Zoning File #1583 August 16f 1990 Page 2 With PRD format of development applicant may gain benefit of total gross area for density credit as long as all structure and improvements are located behind the 75' setback line. Total gross area = 120f395 s.f. or 2.76 acres Allowed density = 5 units The limitations on density will be the degree of hardcover excesses allowed with the 75~250' setback area at 22^000 s.f. or .5 acres. Excessive hardcover exists with the existing access road and for any upgraded road because of its location within the 75* setback line on the north side of the peninsula. 3. Section 10.32 - PRD Ordinance 4. Section 11.10, Subdivision 6, 1, and 8 - Sketch Plan Review under the subdivision regulations. Review of Application A plan for three single family detached units has been proposed by applicant. Applicant may ask for density allowance based on 2.76 gross acres. In 1982, the City granted approval of a 3 lot plat (Exhibit K) that included Lot 31 (lot with existing house) in overall calculations. The issue for this review is: Will the City approve hardcover excesses within the 75~250* zone to meet a level of density that can be supported by overa11 gross area? The applicant shows hardcover at approximately 48%. Based on staff's buildable envelope at 22,000 s.f., it would be more at 60%. Please note this does not include the hardcover of the access road at over 7,000 s.f. in area. The road hardcover will be the same whether it serves one house, two houses or three houses as the entire road bed will be located within the 75' setback line. It would be to applicant's advantage to develop under a PRD mode If applicant was to satisfy the standard of a plat under the direction of the LR-IC district, a plan would be limited to no more than two, maybe one. The setbacks would use up the already restricted building envelope. Please review the engineer's report (Exhibit D). We are once again reminded that we do not have a legal public road access to these parcels via the platted property to the east. Public access must be designated and dedicated on the formal PRD subdivision proposal. The City will ask the applicant to request in writing for an access and utility easement from the three involved property owners. If denied, the City nfust proceed with a separate condemnation action. Zoning File #1583 August 16r 1990 Page 3 Please Review Exhibit E. In the recent Sketch Plan reviews for this property, the City staff has failed to note that there are no designated wetlands on this property. The limitations on the site remain the 75' setback line and the 931.5' flood plain elevation. Review Exhibit I. The applicant proposes the filling in of the flood plain and matching excavations in other sections of the flood plain. This type of land alteration not only involves review by the MCWD, but the DNR and Ih.j Corps of Engineers and will require separate conditional use per^l■•^• * “'-<3 variance application with the City of Orono. In reviewing ExhiL^c I you will also note that applicant has attempted to address the hardcover excesses by installing catch basins and dry wells designed to treat run-off before entering lake. Applicant notes that hardcover from all drives have been directed to the catch basins. Note the drainage arrows designated on drainage plan define drainage paths to catch basins. Staff Connients First, staff would like to compliment the applicant for responding to the concerns addressed in the original sketch plan review (Exhibit F). We have before us a far more realistic proposal, very similar to the one approved in 1982 by the City for three units. The following issues must be addressed to provide direction for the filing of formal plans of development: 1. Access/sewer easements. The City will ask the applicant to contact the three involved property owners. Depending upon the individual responses, the City will be obligated to commence condemnation if necessary. Responses of the neighbors must be received prior to the filing of the formal application so that the City may commence the condemnation at the time of filing the application. 2. Approved densities. What level is reasonable for the site? a. In 1982 the City approved three units. The exception was included in these considerations. The majority of Lot 31 is located within the 75' setback area. The inclusion of 31 does not help the density. Remember gross density is at 2.76. The area of Lot 31 does not increase the buildable area of the restricted building envelope. b. Would you approve three units if hardcover was reduced? j How does the Planning Commission accept applicant's counter proposal with the catch basin/dry well treatment of run-off? Will it affect your decision? Zoning File #1583 August 16r 1990 Page 4 This type of improvement was accepted by the Council in 1982. Has our policy changed - the ordinances have not changed? 3.Applicant to be advised that a PRD is the only acceptable or practical method to develop the remaining undeveloped ■portions of the peninsula. Remember the existing PRD code exclusive of the Highway 12 corridor is very broad and subject to approval of the Council. Applicant should be advised to work with staff to develop most efficient plan for PRD design based on final resolve of density. Isv CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address rat .diir parv riRmn mm Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) OH-l 17-'H-ono6 ('r)007-»- QQQ8+ 0009+ 0010 + 00011 +0012 + 0013 + 0014 + 0016 +0017 + 0018 Please check one - Property ____ abstract or + torrens? Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT Name MARCO R. FRANKLIN Phone (home) 938-4790 Phone (work) SAME Address: 13237 ORCHARD DR.City: MTKA.Zip: 55343 OWNER (if different than applicant) sameName Phone (home) Phone (work) Address: (attach list if more than one) City:Zip: EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size 2. .76. Present Use (check) Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential? no. of units _3 Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Zoning District R-3 PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: 3 Proposed Gross Density: Existing Units New Units Total Units Units per Acres Minimum Lot Size: in SIDE 7S ft. ?7.378 Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check)Residential Other (specify) MINIMOM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1, Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). ^ ^ 4. /rAs an addendum to this application, please attach a^ separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 2. 3. 4. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date^- - --- - - - - - - - 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete Zoning Official's Signature _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date^- - - --- - - - - -- FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement $150.00 250,00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision)250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential)300.00 + 20.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance Applicant's Signature Date 7-23-90 Owner's Signature Date 7-23-90 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to atter\d a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building s Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. » ! m M Bonestroo Rosene AnderUk & Associates Oao G Bon«tnx). PE Roccn W ttoicne. PB Joseph C AnCfen>k. PB Mjrvrn L Sorva«a. PE ff E Turr^ pC Jirrei C C '.cn ©E Gicnn R Coo« PB £ MCfti. PB RoCen G kr'u''<r(t. PE Su«n M EPe'^ r C Pj^ Engineers & Architects K^:th A GooJon. PE Ricnard W FojiCf. PE Doca^ C BorgafdL PE Jerry A. Bourdon. PE Van* A Hanscf*. PE Ted K EexJ. PE M<hae« T Rautmann PE Rotert R P^ff^r< PE Dav<J O Louota PE Thorras W Petersor» PE M<hae« C Lyncn. PE James R Ma«and. PE iCer.netn P Anderson. PE Warii R Refs. Pl Rooert C Russek. A lA Thcrrjs E Angui PE H(7-vard A Sanfbrd. PE Dan^i j Edgenon PE Mark A Seia PE PhiiiO J Casweti. FE ismaei Mamr^z PE N^ark O PE Thomas R Anderson. AIA Gary F Ryianoer. PE ^i’es 8 Jensen. PE L Phtfiip Gravel fil Pc Rene C P»umarL AJA Agnes M Ring. AIC P Jeny D Penzsch. PE Cec o O^ v-er. PE Chanes A. Er<kson Leo M Pawersky Hanao M Oson P August IS. 1990 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Attn: Jeanne Mabusth Re: Baldur Park Peninsula Our File No. 139-1583 Dear Jeanne: We have reviewed the proposed subdivision on Baldur Park Peninsula. The turn around area should be platted as public right-of-way. The center landscaping is not desirable in a public street. There is some concern by property owners to the south relative to adequate public access to this property. This concern should be reviewed and resolved by the developer. Drainage and utilir • easements will be necessary for sanitary sewer, wetland areas and storm drains..e. Please contact this office if you have any questions Yours very truly. BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC Glenn R. Cook GRC:dh grc/88 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 ---- • i • *• ■ •j* • / • w. .* •. - _____ .. »-A ^. ^ *t / „ • • I I. ■»•’•• •!•.•:;?;• .••/:: •; •. • I. * w iti^ ' -•?> • .. .' • • 1* *■• / •• •. • .'.I .'V': ■•.■:;•■'•■•■•,■. •.•'I . ‘ •’ •■>■'■.V' - ; t;.;-.: • ■• •'; 'i ' : - :•; "V. r,' ■. ' • V . . ' ‘'.Cv'. .:•, • .•f t \ * * ♦ ^ i :' .•V •• • • • • • • • f-:‘ . * -4 ' • Jl•' •• • • . * . '•1 • V ' * ^• ' • .* •:tA.n ■ • |*S» .(V.. 1^# !WJ * •• • * a J - ^ V,: ^ M i • *•-• I • • • • .f.-'liv ••!• • « irV I .^.- • V ■ •• • . .* . •* I •••• .*. H • *.:• » ■ : ♦ S’ilJ. iTBia rtaaseB'fecHrt »• 9 A? V* ' .t fflKyl; 1 1 i* L - W*r I • J ‘ p jiff %» m4 -. Q« I 9 I VI. - h*j% / T* ♦ *• • f9fm • M : A 4 *• \ -r oH >r nj PQo •Dm :q 5 o 0^ C/l n o Jjr 01•11 o H«v« 13 oj o r~Zr--<233«> ni > C3 oi zXmenm > aMl 31 HH 3J (n CO •-• *-4 c c•cn •• I-I n J2 m ? 33 Ono <m:o •:? X o .'S‘ C/l y% in m•n c/l •n c/l % ttv 1 • u II n C/l C/l• • •n m t=ri3 m > O H o % vy S' B C/l 11 in H cn m n C3m > n X VM 8 c/l 11 a m tZJ 3) <m > < cn > 33 > Cl 01 -rtv. Vi 8 c/l n in in • • -n 11 in mn > O X 0 c c/l 01 §-1 u% 01 I CO ^ I H >I I z I Q I I in I > I 33 I a I n I o I <• m I 3J I M O Zm n C3 fT| I zI II o I m 33orin ozm 2n-n 2 § n in 11 cn 11 cno CD \/0. af THE* A^EA k'/iTHlH '75-2.00 ‘ 2oH6 6HAU- PPAIM/ To CMfcH RA«IM0 5 pPYH&Lt'^ Peei<i»HEP Tt> iNSOf^E PptJPEf^. pll/ref<M<2» PeftPFi* EHTEj^Nd LA|^. THO?» pOH-opp CUBAH5ED Py c5ftA<9$ED VE^EtWTP A(2eA«5» 4HAU-* HOT EXCgeP AU/?tMEP CcPE,. ACU HA^-Wi/EfS nitH(n o>‘^-75'•^he. pt^ain-to catcM 6a«in V csprtoeu^ 0^ ----- .■1M Ml ifTia ■ I ii^ imr ■ i ^ «Kri*iM ¥^‘m 1275 mam eooKU umMvrmvt • J. diam Oo«tt«ii I waauc mmim im TtM r.n. 1. tiM p.a. tlS?! e«r«l Mlly/J«aM NasMy, mo, )Oia caseo yoiat Ro«4 • yrcllaiaary tubdivltlM I. TtM tim JttAAB 6rtMf/J«a«t leffiHUi* 4720 »ortli An Dr<n mMt • VACAtiOA Of OfAilUlf* UK OtiUty BAOOMntO ACTIM xvmt Roviow Of th«M itm vlU • yvkUe iMoriAf** J. •14fS 4. IlSTO 5. I1S54 I. n»s 7. 41040 0. I1S41 4. 41940 10. 41072 11. 41074 12. 41070 12. 41074 14. 91077 10. 41071 14. 41074 17. 41900 10. 41041 14. 41002 mcB run 20. 41000 ABDinonu; xtM 22. OUmlof Ch«ek DoMioy - 2440 Caaeo Point ltoo4 VariAoeoo - MforroO Oaek to 4 bf cooneil for rurthor IotIm lonaiM r—loom Tinethy Grmnti - 4400 oerth An Orivo - VarioAO# - Contlnvation of Poblie ■oorinfVarioAO# - Contlnvati Landotar. Xne. - 2001 Old Ooaeh Aoad - rrtllnlnary Oobdlrlaion - Centlnttation of Pnblle Boarlno of Poblie loajriny tiny - 1040 To rlaneo - Poblie Roariny Oam^aaioo ayymryl of aimitoa of 2«ly 14. 1440 oootlny. •5 I I HOLZER PROPERTY jjr/S70 8l^t/9o p.C. nnfj L»gt Lot ^7570 ■ ■ S'-Slo -^O 'pc. hni<^. Oticription 36, Spring Park D«t# : *-7.82.5-1«-90 rtv. r-^-f scii»: r a «o‘ • : Iron ntrktr found 0 : Iron narktr stt Sttringi shown «r* to *n •ssuntd c<tun. JtMM Aronr/ This survsy shows the location cf ill existing buildings and visible “hardcover" in relation to the boundaries of the above described property. It ooes not purport to show any other improvenents or encroacinents. 1 hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly regist ered land surveyor under the la** of the State of Minnesota. COffIN I GRONeERG. INC. Marx s. uronoerg mn. LTc. No. ITT;; Engineers, Land Surveyors, PlanhRfs Long Lake, Minnesota #1565 Sjsio/fO p .c. m+<) e W*<«n U/s 1^ tlu; #1565 ?'Po- 90 p.c. m-h^. ^1^65 - ' Z' / r*zo k amt-M 3*^M •# ^ *«««M « %< *T% '.. • ’i ’ff' *-t A<H s»Mi ^..,v te^r'rr*'’-- ^ 4fwrt*ki I I ^ /'S(fcS- f-^O-90 >.<2. r-»:. •■:: .-- I Cartirteata of Sufviy for Riehio and Loosa Anderson in let 1, Block 2, Townalte of Uin(;dcn Park Ueeneplr. CounVi Mnneaota 1 hereby certify that Ihla la a true ird corrvct repraaantatlon of a aurvey of the boundorlea of that part of let 1, Block 7, Tovnalto of Lnnedon Park Inaliadlnc portion of Northorn Arenuo, now vacatoe, deaerlbol aa followai Coiaaenrlnt- at the point of Intoraeetton of the Northerly line of the rl|^it-of-way of the Great Northern Railway Coroany with the Southerly eatenelon of the Sivldiny line between lA>ti 1 and 2 In aald Block 2, Townalte of Un(;don Park| thence North> woaterly alotiK the dlvldlni lino between said lota 1 and 2 and sane extended, a dietonce of 213.14 feoti thanca Northoaatnrly daflectlnf richt at an anfle of S2®M' free laat-dnarrlbad course a dleti.r.cfi of 240 feet to the aeVonl point of beylrnlni: of the tract of land to ba deacrlbad{ thonro KortheuGtarly defleetlni' rii;ht at an anele of 12‘*12' fron UeU daaerloed courae a diatnnee of 60 foot; thence Southonut- only a dlatence of 26P.6 feet to a poin*. in the t.‘orthorly lioe of aald richUof-koy o' tho Croat horthei-n Railway Coopany, wlileh oolnt Is 175 feet Kortheastorly reteured ulonp th* * rtherl.'- line of eulu railway rlght-of-va;' free the jLiutlal point of co(ir>enr«r*cnt I thonco Southw-jrtci ly blone aald Northerly right-of-way line 35 feeti th.enre J'orthwuiterly in a atralpht lino 263.2 feet to the actual point of lei.lnnlnt;; alao lnclu<llnf; ail that part of Uit 1 ir. aalJ Flock 2 iylrt tetueon the Northwesterly line of Ibo prerjisea horelr.abovo derrrlbed erd the chore of l«ka Hlimetonka, and between tho Ikjrtherly axtenaloii ef the fortheeat- arly and Southveeterly aide llnoa of the praalaea horolrabovo first ^ described, together with all rlperlar. rights, accretions and reltctlons V . .1: -ir tWc-tocAedtac pereteo-r- - ■;........................ POM daacrited as fotlouo : Corjaot.clr.f; at t-.e point ,1 i of letoraoctton of tho Northerly line of tho rlsht-of-way of tho Groat (^rtheni ' f I^wjy Colony vlth tha Southerly extenalon of tha dlvldln, Una between Lots ’ 1 and 2 In said Block 2, Towstta of Unr’on Parki thence Korthuantarly along the divljinj lino botuoen sold Lota I and 2 end aeoe •***"^*^* • dlabince of 213.14 faetj tiionee northeaatarly dol lartln,; ripht at im angle of 82*55* froo last- towee e disUnce of 240 feotj thence eortlnulnfi Kortheeaterly doflectlny rl(ht at an angle of 12»U* froQ laet-deecrlbod course a dleUnro of 6C feot to the ectuol point of beplnnlne of the tract of land to ^ deac^ds thence contlnolrf fro. auld actual point of beylnnlri Ro»thoaaterly on the extension of eaid laat-laacribe^ line a diatanco of 44.5 feot to eorcrwte »oiiu;.*nt ceur.ior corr.arj thence cor.tlnuiiii; hcrtheact- erly a dleUnee cf % feat to a point in the eer.tnrlina of platted atreet now Vacated which abuts upon tha BaaUrly 11m of said Lot I an! which nolnt is 2P1.35 foit North of t vj intersection of the ronteriiro of Mid vacat^ street with the Korllierlv lino of tia ritht-o.'-w.y of the Great Korthem Railway Company! t^ncs Soutiierly along tho centerline of said vacetsd etroet to a point in tha Northerly llrwj of eaid rl.+.t- of-wey which Is 21C.8 feet distort fro. th<i initial point of cocsnunrensi.u seusurod along tho Northerly line ef »ld rlcht-of-wsyj thenee Southwestarly alon^ tha northerly lino of aatd right-of-way a dlatsr.ee of 35 6 feet) thence Northerly a dlstHr.ee of 26^.6 feet to the actual point of berlrnirg of tract of lard deeerlb^t *"'^**‘» *«*t«»:l:' 7.f. foot thereofi aleo includinr ell Inu* part of said Lot 1 lying betwem torthwesUrly and Northerly Un^e of tho orarlsoH hereinbefore descrited end the shore of Uka Kirnotonka, Vr . ertorol^ or tha Reat^sly end Soulhwenlerly eldo llwe of the preedaoe herelrtefore rlnorlen rights, eccretlon», erd r llrtlona eprurtorjirt thereto, exeoptlnc aald above^acrlM fcsUrly 7.: feet thereo', according to Ohi pUt tnareof on file and of record in tho orfir« of tho Roflptor of Ooed« in oivl for upld cr>ta)ty, | Traet C lying Bouthweaterly of a line.drawn froia tha point in the Westerly U feet North ef the Sewtherly comer ef Traet C, to a point In tho SoutheeaUVly line w. — Jf TUleIIt'cl^S*ef'lliil5tn?'‘““‘’^ '**‘**^”‘‘ and the location of all axiatlng buildings thereon, ereaebnents. line ef said Traet G, of said Traet C, It doea net ^rpert to al^ ether inproeesMts er en- Scalei 1* a 56* OaU I B-.75-C3 o I Iron aerkar ••trlaed 3-30-S4 to Include part of Tract C, hAisterod Lend Sunrey No. 429. GORDON B. COFFIN fO., IHC. v-T.-an n. uoi T in 6%^ Ft.r« Crur.bnrg Reg.'ho.U 755 &»rT>>ioro end Planrerr ■----Uikc, Klrjviaotn ?'^0'9o pc. law* of the State of COrriN 4 GROMBERG, IMC. Mark S. Gronber9 Mn. LiGronber9 Mn. Lie. No. 12755 Bn9ineera, Land Surveyors, Planners Lonq Lake, Minnesota Data I 7-25-90 Sealei 1' - 10* o I Iron starker o 90 rY)-h<i- I f ^ /5'7'R ^-sio-90 pa y^^f- p _SP"m V%. . : .! i ;f ■ ; -4; - ' v-A-v ■*.-V>1 xk V. •• -. :>>;• •- :r V-.j <»-5. - • .^'* .*. <.*• ! ■1' -r^.k A *•••■•. ■■' ■• ''• "■-•■•^.V-^> •-•-.'•A-!?^ ................. #15^4 flees?; iw m P -- t%;j3 -.- •■ -r j-r-KgAK- g-Ug VAT lOf^ K'^ # i ..V i ‘‘4 ■..M. k ■: P.C. VY\itp CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JUDSON M. DAYTON OF LOT 1. BLOCK t. UNDERHILL FARMS HENNEPIN COUNTY , MINNESOTA #1575 ia- LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 1. Block 1, Undertiill Farms. This survey shows the location of an existing rouse, shed and driveway in relation to the boundaries of the Jbove described property. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered land surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. COFFIN ( GR0NBER6. INC. Hark 5. uronoerg Mn. IIC. NO. iZ75b Engineers. Land Su^veyors, Planners Long Lake, Minnesota Date : 7-23-90 Scale; 1“ • 50' 0 : Iron marker Bearings shown are to an assumed datum. I I S>-po-90 P-<^ a ' . ^«-i*».2T5S1 i 1 ■ ^- i?p-^-l]o ij fpLi- g-: - Certificate of Survey for John W. Wojcik of Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 203 Hennepin County, Minnesota ^o-fO P y cootA/rr /^oAo a/o. fv |LeqaI Deacrtptlon Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 203, Itennepin County, Minnesota. This survey shows the location of all existing buildings andprop>osed additions in relation to the south and east lines of the above described property. It does not purjxjrt to show any other ioprovements or encroachments. I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by sie or under my direct supervision and that I an a duly registered land surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. COrriN t C.ROMBERG, INC. Mark S. dronBerg Lie. lio. 12/55 Engineers, Land Surveyors, Planners Long Lake, Minnesota # i Date I Scale! 7-27-90 I- . 30' Iron marker found Iron marker set Bearings shown are an assusted datum. ,,p- ' . •• J >•, ' j '? '~4:;; »■ ■••': -‘nI IttMIfttiit --• : ' t ' c\ ■ c:\ ‘1 ?--s-0-?O ^.c. m-^ COFFIN S ORONBEna INC tiwiwwa U»«—V«VOM> FtiUlNMWI UMo uMu. MMwnarA itiif coF»r» * mamam. tm STS; TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR H. RICHARD ZUCKMAN IN GOV'T LOT 2. SECTION 17-117-23 A GOV’T LOT 5. SECTION 18-117-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA -0 - SCALE iiNCH = »OFEitf':^»*’■=»- DATE MAY 17, ,990 (TtMO - -N • IRON marker DATUM MEAN SEA LEVEL COFFIN & GRONBERG. INC. (SRViH Y SURVEYORS. PLANNERS '"*li)NG LAKE. MINNESOTA fX«l ♦-♦f ’ f mmm\ t W. i • ’ I If 11 ■' iiM >f mrtmmm* • / •* t • f .411 ^ flA> r« f U b * 21# *S9 » !•. II f IM 148 4 m-* lv •;.««• f Mil A :*-t . *f m. w’ f -• *, l» ’* iP>«Ni Hn«tl> •! »¥m M '«0 • : ; »4nMWfi« -• •«. > . * • .--r« ■ >^^>W • r*< • -m ■ -■s^-' ■ • tv- ■/■ »«*» ’ '><••.'- .'.orr-a 3 ■•^S^vi-V-, •»>-j J^- ».l .*.. ,. :»?».Sj*i!,r ' .•’ *V**- '■ ■ •■••* ’fti*'/. '^■'■•' ’■r^Trt.r^.'- '. . , >-> -^. - —w, — .. t,-...-.. - •-,... .,. ,:. .i.-. . ''■ %i*5: •■*2: <^ * vrvr»r. •* ' ^ ,v_r•• V' .',i■ '.-y ^V-*-.vi> <i^v<tii> •* ■<- rw- »-»<«^ ''S&’-K. i -k 'To , ' * -♦ V *X -s_ - - ' .Vy. >■' ; fer#=iai ------ ^ 15^^ 5j. s ;r I :|^ ' ; i‘. c i f If! !ii: P ^ sMt. ^/nt^ 1= 1 - J-..30-9O pc. mic^. Sfl a ffi ’■ » i « 5 is « . hum' - niM.^ -- asa^-ssrasint-. 1 fyt4jMIHAfrfw FUH mwH /tfey “ ' ■ -■ z. isssk cr-r.vjs^*«-*.---*- V* S; I iJ. lip; •**■,: u <V^ > - » V -i P* ;s»rt. 7/.*.i^ ^-so-9o P.C./VJ+7. u i W iN r^^i. I' >ei 7/.»./»«