The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04-16-1900 Planning Packetr a To;Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: April 13r 1990 #1516 Mr. & Mrs. Whitney MacMillan, etal, 1560, 1580 find 1620 Fox Street - Preliminacv Subdivision - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-IB, Single family rural residential, 2 acre, unsewered Application - Four lot residential subdivision to replat property located at 1560, 1580 and 1620 Fox Street, resulting in 1 additional buildable lot. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit C D E 1. 2. 3. Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Proposed Plat Drawing (1 large sheet) Staff Sketches: Existing Lot Lines Private roads/driveways Proposed Lot Lines Scale Drawing of Proposed New Residence Orientation from File #1517 Letter from City Engineer 4/12/90 with Recommended Cul-de-sac Location Pertinent Pacta - 1. Proposed lot areas are as follows (per preliminary plat drawing): Total number of lots -• 4 lots 3 outlets Areas: Block 1, Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 513,210+ s.f. or 11.78+ acres 523,444+ s.f. or 12.02+ acres 139,310+ s.f. or 3.21+ acres Block 2, Lot 1 93,650+ s.f. or 2.15+ acres Outlet A Outlet B Outlet C Road 512,400+ s.f. or 11.76+ acres 326,815+ s.f. or 7.50+ acres 54,315+ s.f. or 1.25+ acres Gross 24,585+ s.f. or 0.56+ acres 2,188,229+ s.f. or 50.23+ acres Net 2,163,644+ s.f. or 49.67+ acres s Zoning File #1516 April 13, 1990 Page 2 of 7 2.The property within the proposed subdivision consists of 6 separate tax parcels owned by 4 different persons or groups. In the current Hennepin County tax books these are listed as: 1. 2. 3. 4. Longridge Associates Cargill MacMillan Edna C. MacMillan Whitney MacMillan The applicants have provided copies of a number of signed consent forms for the various apparent ownerships. Of course, the final plat drawings will need to be signed by all parties. 3.Three of the existing 6 tax parcels contain existing residence structures. The other 3 parcels are vacant. Two of the developed parcels and 2 of the vacant parcels do not abut a public right-of-way or a platted private road outlot. Discussion - The intent of primary applicants Mr. & Mrs. Whitney MacMillan is to create 1 new building site upon which to construct 1 new single family residence. Staff has determined that a plat is required. While it may appear that this could be accomplished by merely rearranging lot lines, a simple metes and bounds rearrangement to accomplish the applicants' layout would result in extremely complex legal descriptions which the County Surveyor's office likely would reject. Also, only platting allows the dedication of private road outlots and easements, which the City will require in this application. A. Existing Roads/Driveways All of the existing houses are served by private easement roads or shared driveways (see staff sketch E-2). A separate shared driveway serves 1620 Pox Street and 1700 Pox Street, plus the tennis building and caretaker house adjacent to it. Further east, a private easement road serves 2 existing residences within the subdivision plus an additional 3 residences outside the boundaries of the subdivision. This private road also connects through Orono Orchard Road to the Hamm property to the east. The new building site is proposed to be approximately midway between the houses at 1560 and 1620 Fox Street. This building site is intended to be served with a driveway shown as a dashed line on Sketch E-2. 1 Zoning File #1516 April 13, 1990 Page 3 of 7 In early discussions with the applicants' Herb Baldwin, staff indicated that ''i^in the boundaries of^t^^ subdivision, the City would ILemenM be granted rvt;\1.e “e%\^“i"nr-i“%rrvlte" ro"dU The applicants have shown this outlot within their proposed plat. Mr. Baldwin was advised that the city would Vt'„^^*io? |re%Yotab^^Vheth« t;t%7ty°would^«^ lt\Va“rL',"Vi“n t“h”e\“ilt^or"y"i?the City's growing awareness of private road issues. in discussions with staff, the Engineer^ini^^^^^ T^^^^to^^he^ cl^ 1. Re-alignment of the road outlot for a future westerly continuation. letter of credit would be required. B. Septic System Considerations The new building site is proposed as Lot 2, ^rire^L," havt\\%TtVstera^^ suTt^ble for sewage treatment needs of the proposed new house. on Lot 1, Block 1, the ®fi®bing house^is^ inteji^^^^^^ removed^ which is functional mound drainfield, ronVe^srsrr.rh‘av\^%:r9;53ea. rhe,. .r. nor required since this lot exceeds 5 dry acres. T a. “j nirtywV 1 has an existing functional septic system and has a“ea?;d“rt%\iat"e“dra"in,leld lire north o£ the houae. Zoning File #1516 April 13, 1990 Page 4 of 7 Lot 1# Block 2 containing an existing caretakers house (which was reconstructed approximately 2 years ago) has a new Uptic system and a tested alternate site adjacent to it. In summary, each of the 4 lots contain the required primary and alternate drainfield sites. C, Proposed Outlets The subdivision proposes 2 outlets for future ' these being Outlet A west of the artificial lake, and Outlet B to the north. The Orono Subdivision Code requires that any crlaJId within a subdivision be documented as and future intended use and conditions must be defined under which those outlets can be developed. that this outlet would be for "future development , staff would suggest the following restrictions on Outlet A: A. Future development or construction of any sort within Outlet A requires City Council approval. B. Subject to future septic testing to verify drainfield sites. C. Subject to future provision of suitable road access per City requirements. D. At the time of future ^development. City will requi^^ Flowage and conservation Easement over the artificial lake. Outlet B to the north under the land. Each of these outlets has about 5 acres of dry buildable D. Wetlands. Ponds. Etc. The proposed bulldin, site within Lot 2 Ldioa^M within that lot, and the proposed Pbe **'intained' ^This'lalce'^ls'approximately 8 acres in area, and is Mt -meandered-, hence property ownership continues through the bed of the pond. Lt- Zoning File #1516 April 13, 1990 Page 5 of 7 Staff has advised the applicants that easements would not be requested for the wetlands or pond area within the outlets, and that those easements would be requested when future development occurs. The City will require granting of a flowage and conservation easement over the wetlands in Lot 1, Block 1 abutting Fox Street. Discussion of an easement for the smaller pond within Lot 2, Block 1 will be found in application #1517, the conditional use permit for work in that non-designated pond area. E. Disoosition of £.x -.ti*.'g Structures A number of buildings and structures on the property apparently are intended to be removed as a result of this replat. In proposed Lot 1, Block 1, the existing residence, which will have a new lot line bisecting it, is apparently intended for removal totally. That lot will still contain a tennis court that is shown to be approximately 12' from the northerly lot line. This is one of the few lot lines that has previously existed and is not changing, hence Planning Commission could justify not requiring that line to move due to its pre-existing status. Other options would be to require 30' setback for the tennis court, or alternatively Planning Commission could request a 50' setback if it is determined that the adjacent lot line is a "rear" lot line. In Lot 2, Block 1, there are two detached garages and a caretaker residence which staff presumes will be removed. Applicants should confirm that this is the case. In Lot 3, Block 1, the existing Whitney MacMillan residence has a detached garage structure that will end up being nearer the defined roadway than the existing house. Technically, this garage could be considered as needing a variance, although it exists. Lot 1, Block 2 has no detached accessory structures. There are also no apparent structures on either of the two future development outlets. Applicants should be requested to provide a schedule for removal of the accessory buildings that are co be removed, and such a schedule should be incorporated into the preliminary and final plat approval resolutions. Zoning File #1516 April 13, 1990 Page 6 of 7 P. Lot Standards Each of the 4 building lots has the required 200' of lot width as measured 50' back from the roadway. Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 and Lot 3, Block 2 all require variances because they do not abut a public road. The outlets are not required to meet lot standards since they are intended for future development. S 1. 2. 3. I ary of Issues Realignment of proposed Outlot C, the road outlet. Provision of a cul-de-sac dedication in that outlet. Extent of required upgrading/development of existing road and recommended cul-de-sac. 4.Designation of future development outlets, conditions of approval. 5. 6. Lot line near tennis court on Lot 1, Block 1. Disposition of existing house ending up on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. 7. Disposition of 2 garages and caretaker house on Lot 2, Block 1. 8. Variance for existing garage on Lot 3, Block 1. Staff Recommendation - Planning Commission should review the above items with the applicant and make a recommendation on each issue as part of your recommendation to Council. Staff would recommend the following laundry list of approval conditions: 1. Revise private road Outlot C to conform to City Engineer's proposed sketch. 2. Recommend that the road in Outlot C between the end of the newer pavement and the cul-de-sac be constructed to City private road standards. 3. Grant standard road and utility easements over Outlot C. 4. Require execution of standard covenant for maintenance of this private roadway. 5. Developer's agreement to be executed between the City and the developers for upgrading of the road. Zoning File #1516 April 13, 1990 Page 7 of 7 6. Strongly reconunend that a homeowners' association of all property owners using the roadway be formed. 7. Granting of the standard drainage and utility easements along all property lines. 8. Define Outlets A and B as designated for future develop ment, requiring that access, lot standards, and septic testing all be found acceptable by this or a future City Council before any development may occur on these 2 outlets (Plowage and Conservation Easements not required until future development occurs), 9. E.tlsting house bisected by the proposed lot line between Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for Lot 2, Block 1. 10. Lot line north of tennli? courts to be moved northward to meet the required 30' minimum sstback for such a structure (Does Planning Commission wish to confirm this as a rear yard, and require a 5C setback?). 11. Dedication on the plat of 33' of right-of-way for Fox Street. 12. Granting of Conservation and Flowage Easement over the wetland in Lot 1, Block 1. 13. Grant variance to allow garage in front yard of Lot 3, Block 1 to remain. i CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICA PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 1560 Fox Street r -'Q: •’i i- I Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) As listed to right... Please check one — Property ^ abstract or _ _ torrens? 117 23 23 0001 03 117 23 14 0003 03 117 23 41 0002 03 117 23 41 0001 02 117 23 32 0005 02 117 23 32 0004] \ttach legal description to application. \PPLICANT Schoell & Madson, Inc. Name c/o Larry L. Hanson Phone (home) 937-1462 Phone (work) 546-7601 Address; 10550 Wayzata Boulevard City: Minnetonka Zip; 55343 IWNERSdf different than applicant) Mr. & Mrs. Whitney MacMillan N2une Estate of Pauline W. MacMillan Phone (home) Phone (work) Long Ridge Associates Address; (attach list if more than one) City;Zip; OaSTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size 2.49 47.74 cirr OF or<Mi fina:%£ office 13502000^-----------a cm Ji 320.00 60723 Present Use (check) Acres Dry Land AcrSs Total^^fll parcels Acres Total, all parcels^^^nrM Residential; no. of units 3_____ Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Zoning District RR-IB PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites;3 T Proposed Gross Density: Mlnlmtjm Lot Size: Proposed Use; (check) 1 Existing Units New Units Total Units (Home on parcel 2600 to be razed) Units per Acres 93,650 Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) MINIMDM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Completed Application Form 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). ‘ ^ ^ 4. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning official's Signature_ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date- - - - - - - - - -- FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II S III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) Final Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) $150.00 250.00 250.00 300.00 + 20.00/Lot 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application an further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature ooate G i % Owner's Signature 'A'w.(rp-'iV^'O Date J I "VG I 'x C) Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Office of this change prior to the meeting. i r »A U)I, UJoe « o -i M U. K O O < < < M M O N »o O -i .. M z tJ?— .A;i oo 0 K1 >» K1 (/) M r!.§»H U. fH 1 CM o in CO ® S K» O ?: M HI in ss “* Ul Ula a _ Q a o < 5 « U. K < < < X s in N u u ® > M M < K X M Z o (/) (0 o O Ul UJ M O H K< < ^ l-C M M a. •H U. ^ ^ K1 7 I5’'z So88|*o i-4 M a f/> ^ ^ ^® ^ oc o o u u a Op Ul CM Oo 0 CM Kl 1“ W a CM .Ig«H U. M 1 CM O O CM — ^ O tHM o UJ (noc< UJ K </) ® K> in in ^^g< X X U. h- < < X X o K »- CM >.>•< m < ^ ^ i-f z inooo CM JO O' K> in in-j .j ^ ml mJ JO ® M M X 5 u ►-::222^5 ? >• > 8 < CM UJ1MU.J- ^ 3 I- »- O N m M M M> > ® iH X X in < ro Q z Z ^ z i-4 o o tn I o z CM H »- M S o ® X X JO UJ UJ o m o a a o ..j ® o .ij -j ^ a JO o < < JO z CMooo r-f JO CM l;;§i rLgi S'"* I > JO __ 0 0 2: rM O' JO in in Ul h- _M a 2 £s| iaJi>T > CM Oo 0 «-< 'J- JO a CM rigr-l U. 1 JOo o CM M>o ^ JO O !!___o .ij -J o o22S| ^mitOZ•J ^ CM Z 8 8 K a X X a -j X ^ a a u u o z 9 7i CM XJOo 0 1 CMoo Xu J- a o 0 CM JO JO CM 1 K iH irH I CMo iMaa iii o ^ «J o •H JH JOr r 1^ o >0 a ® JOo a o JO o ^ -j CO 2^ ^ CM z8 8 >- a X X X -J < < UJ a u u o Z Q mJ X Z O O < X o a Z UJ •< < >- X X < UJ l|li& o ^ 1-4 Os ! UJoc ZUi CO v! </)M M Lsi toc UI 2 UJ K O O O M '*^►-0 0 rlgSSfe ,1, iHO' K»a £ 5522 O O M M < SSS2SS3 pr n 4 im • f.‘ rV & U"* 1'*t • 4' iT>D CO >i;;22S ooo CMoo X 5m 3N U CL UJ ^M X o o C<?OMO Golf Co^iZSC ^U. 6-2 f/?tv^r£ ;l.^:rv7'A. isto fc>( ADW2€SS /Wb ■ APP(CPX>V^<VTt C-OCATtOAJ OF CXIiTIfJC* - /fjJilCATCS Corv^v^o^ ✓ ✓ ^ " 350 , \ VAc. ^—AB>aT^ ' *? / VAC-- OROWO CoLf Co^AtiSt . £"^3 ; pga(>c'Le^ fL. uor (B,OWfJ Ci Af?.J CS l$to fo^ lioblC^TES APW^€^S /^b • APP^Xli^'^VTlE. tc?CAT?0/0 grX/STIKJC* -J • /IjLICATCS Co^iA^oO iPtofJekelHiP ^■7 <//^ V. >.-; tH LQ ^ ■' VL ? /'S'\ •y c^''r- r- ,as^\\ / 4- }/ V,,-' te $i n Vv^*r P*’■2 % ! .HUaOlMiV<-X V / C>*JFiSy^.^C\ - \ ‘ \ \ •^•^S. V \ V / '.. ♦ i •<»*. lomm .S”''"WV". ‘ »- »_____\\ \‘g'e :V>. -■ "f*fe r t:.-“/; ■* f ^-V-.l''/' //A^ .... iV A \ » ; '. \ //'*> .iTsV^ / .X r\ \ l\'■) £fc^ <•>.'n. ‘••* W •ov/ ,A//‘ .N t I .*• ' ' ----1 ^•1*4 .|•|n« \ ^nV * V I' M Bones troo Rosene Anderijk & Associates Oag 0 aofwmo, Untc^ W Roicfif Pg jrwcn C A/^Jik. f r f ^tfnrt >»t C Ow. Pf Gttifi« C004. Pf fnofTu* ► PI BD0«T( 0 k^wnmf PC Marvtfi I PP ICnmA 0CM9M PI tcnjiif vu Toifff. P| Oo^ C Ivigiim PC Xrry A IOy«vv Pf U#r» A n^niofi PJ 1t0A »«NdLPi r Ptwi/vum Pi leocrt P P^rlf. pf Opws 0 LOfieu. PJ r/ttihM vi< Pettfiorv Pf PkfljeiC tyntn PI iAmn I .vuuna p> Mrvvnn P A^mon pi MmI Mi P£ lDDc«r C Mtet Aia ThomPi f Argui PC H0«¥M A |«nM pf OlAttl JL logrrtnA PC mm A SCO PC PMp J. Caivm# Pf MJf» li w^Mn pf frx»n«\ f Anr»*.*ior« AIA r tyungr* Pf B jfntfft. PP I p»»«>i» a PC ( A I^M P.fVWHtty KffUA M Oncp V/u»« M CPA Engineers A Architects April 12. 1990 rTlf ^0^J I DRcr:o V *"=^JUiSSSiK^S City of Orono Box 66 Cryittl Bay. MN 55323 Attn: Mike G'lffrar APR 1 3 1990 Ret 139-1516 MacBlllan Addition Dear Mikei Ve have revlevsd the plant tubmitted on the Maeaillan Addition. The folloving Bodifleationt to the plat are recoonended. The roadvay alignment, should be adjusted so it can be extended westerly in the future. The dedication of a cul-de>sac near the end of the road is recooaended. The roadvay from the end of the existing blacktop to the cul-se>sac should be constucted in accordance with city standards. Drawing easements should be provided along with lot lines. The street grading and drainage plan should be submitted and a bond provided prior to beginning work. If you have any questions please contact this offics. Yours very truly. BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLZX i ASSOCIATES. INC. Glenn R. Cook ORCilp 3A • Da»*» ee*«9 * /a4.*/.A.* Planning Conunissior Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson I t. From: Date: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator April 13, 1990 Subject: #1517 Whitney MacMillan, 1560 Fox Street - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-lB Application - Request for conditional use reconstruction of existing artificial pond. List of Exhibits permit for Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit C D E Application Plat Map (see application #1516) Property Owners List (see application #1516) Survey (see application #1516) Proposed Site/Grading Plan Discussion *> As part of their proposed new residence construction after the subdivision is approved, applicants wish to reconstruct and slightly enlarge a small existing pond within proposed Lot 2, Block 1. The existing pond is approximately 200' long and ranges in width from 40'-90', with a total water surface area of about 1/4 acre. Applicants propose to rebuild this pond by dredging It slightly deeper and increasing it to an average width of about 70', They would be constructing a stone wall approximately 2' high along the outlet as a dam, and propose to continue maintaining the elevation of the pond about 2' above the 3^tificial lake level by using their private well. The proposed stone wall will be approximately 77' back from the shoreline of the 8 acre Hake, The applicants' proposal does not indicate how much dredge spoil will be obtained, but staff would estimate that an area ®1 y 70'x220'x3' deep will be excavated, resulting in approximately 1,700 cubic yards of dredge spoil. Absent any proposal to use that dredge spoil in some other location on the property, staff would expect that this material will be trucked off the property. The City Engineer reviewed this application and had no specific comments. Applicants are proposing a granite field stone border and the pond will be underlined with a 30 mil poly liner to miminize seepage and help maintain water in the pond. Zoning Pile #1517 April 13r 1990 Page 2 of 2 Based on the designated wetland air photo maps at City Hall, this small Dond is not a designated wetland, and has existed a an artificial pond since prior to 1970. A site inspection and review of the topography suggests that this area was probably a low wet area but probably not a significant wetland prior ^o the pond's original construction# In response to the question whether the City should require a Conservation and Flcwage Easement over the City Engineer indicated that the value to the public of this pond is relatively insignificant as compared to the 8 acre artificial lake adjacent to it, and that the the pond is only about 3 acres, almost all of which will be within Lot 2, Block 1. Glenn suggested that it is probably not necessary to require a Conservation and this pond, especially since its water level will be artificially maintained. Staff Recommendation “ Based on the above comments, staff would recommend approval of the conditional use permit for reconstruction of this artificial pond under the following conditions: 1. All dredged spoils to be trucked off site. 2. Proposed stone wall to be at least 75' back from the shoreline of the adjacent artificial lake. 3. Adhere to indicated plan, with 5* maximum depth at center of pond, 1'-1'6" depth at pond border. 4. Stone platform patio area extending into pond is approved as a part of the project. 5. Applicant or applicant's agent shall obtain the required land alteration permit prior to commencement of work on the pond. 6. Applicant and applicant's contractor shall place and maintain appropriate erosion control methods (silt f®nc®» etc ) to keep any of the disturbed areas or temporarily dodged bp”!. moving into the adjacent final grading, the disturbed shall be immediately seeded or sodded to minimize erosion# r ’ PRESENT OSB OP PROPERTYutx uos \jr rnujr&Kxz 117 Present Zoning District 11^ Present Use of Property _ _ Residential Other (specify) detail: ^ SClSTlt^fe- at REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. completed Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11" X 17” OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fea-.j)ayment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this applica^j^^^^ad^eftif^s that the information supplied is true and correct to tW^*wBC0^''T'is/per'^owledge. Applicant's signature iii Date wledc es*and OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges*Wnd agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request Owner's signature^\\ VA ^ Date tij Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have a*, authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building S Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. n To;Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Prom Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:April 11, 1990 Subject:^1502 Michael Hilbelink, 2180 Prospect Avenue Variances - Continuation of Public Hearing List of Additional Exhibits Exhibit N - Staff Letter to Cook Exhibit 0 - Cook's Report 3/26/90 Exhibit P - Drainage Plans for 1985 Drainage Project Adjacent to North Property Line Exhibit Q “ Amended Drainage Plan Exhibit R - Hilbelink Letter of 3/14/90 Review of Application - The original application involved lot area, side setback ®rid height and setback variances for proposed fencing along the south property line adjacent to unimproved Prospect Avenue. The Planning Commission appeared to have no problem with the lot area side variance setback phase of the application. Planning Commission advised the applicant that they could not recommend approval of the variances sought for the fencing recommending plantings instead of a structure for necessary screening and protection of property. The most immediate concern was the affect of the proposed construction and grading upon the existing sensitive drainage area. At the March 19, 1990 meeting of the Planning Commission, the lot area/side setback variance application for Michael Hilbelink was tabled pending receipt of further directions from the City Engineer regarding drainage concerns expressed Planning Commission members and most affected neighbor to the north. Staff requested the following direction concerning the drainage issue: 1. Information on underground drainage tile and potential impact from drainage on this site when developed. 2. Alternate methods to lessen impact of drainage from site in a developed state. 3. Recommendation concerning property owner to the north and owner's willingness to deed drainage easement to City. In addition, determine need for additional easement area within subject property (review Exhibit N). i. Zoning File #1502 April 11, 1990 Page 2 of 3 The City Engineer has asked for a 20' drainage easement along the north property line. As it appears that the drainage tile is completely located within the property to the north, a 10' easement should be adequate. If you will remember at the March meeting, the property owner to the north agreed to grant drainage easements to the City in the hope that the City would now maintain what is obviously a public storm sewer system. Please review Exhibit Q, the revised grading and drainage plan reconfirms the majority of the lot drainage being directed to the front yard for collection at the catch basin within Briar Street. The City Engineer's comments will be presented for your consideration at your April meeting. Staff has included the original plans for the storm sewer project along the north property. The underground drainage tile along the north appears to be 12" connecting to an existing 15" clay tile draining westward. Although not noted in the Engineer's report (Exhibit 0), in conversation with Cook he has advised that there has been no reported problem with the existing system since its installation in 1985. Cook also notes that no design of a storm sewer system could handle back-to-back 100 year storms as in the svimmer of 1987. The City Engineer will be asked to review all final grading plans submitted with any buildxng application for this property. Staff has discussed the willingness of the neighbor to the north to dedicate or to grant easements over the underground drainage tile within the south property line of their property with the Public Works Director. Gerhardson agrees that the City should accept the drainage easement. Cook shall determine the necessary width to provide adequate area for maintanence of said line and catch basin areas. Please note that staff has sent a letter to the Jentiluccis asking for their written confirmation and willingness to grant the drainage easements. Please review Exhibit R, at your previous meeting the subject letter was submitted for your consideration because applicant failed to submit building plans/elevations for the review. The applicant does not have definite building plans, hut agrees to build within the defined envelope set forth in the exhibits. He understands that any change from the defined plan would require a new review by the City. Options of Action - Denial. If denied, please refer to the necessary findings set forth in the variance sections of the Zoning Code. I Zoning File #1502 April 11, 1990 Page 3 of 3 .nd va%Ta”« kr the lot area height and setback variance for uTp n denying the fn??^ property line. Approval may^L^ba^i’i!?® fencing along the following findings: ^ based on one or more of the acre zoning^standards!^^^^ acres and is subject to 2.0 3/4 surrounding 1/2 - neighborhood. ^ opment within the Crystal Bay 3. The property is served with sewer. yeark'^^The^r'k^ur^ wVs*''kcrte ’d’®ol’'^°'’®''‘'’ °''®p property llne/Prospect Avenue^^Lk'^h".^ “pkksld .kgulkkYon tY InYrekY thkb"uVldkYen«llk\‘'“* Approval must Include the following conditions: the new construYYif* permit by the city for county thaf deYkkenYkkri' TsktYT assessments have been paid Anr,Hf5 I • special that there is approximately S6^825^fid f'YAln advised as a result of the hazardoif.* h»?i incurred by the City in the process of being assess^!? action. This fee is Applicant will have ooDori-iin<4.?*r®^ against the property. formal assessment orderk by the court's P"® PublYc wkkroirertV/p°/ior YYthYY®‘ reviewed bypermit. -«^ecT:or prior to the issuance of a building Certificate of Occupancy^^^ sewer prior to the issuance of a nkw cohkklk:rpkorkYsskakekYkY!f!dYn1"^?mYt"f kund«Y'linYand^°kYYrfrtinY®oYdlY"‘easements (10’ ainnrr drainage and utility west property lineK® ®°“‘»®rn property line and 5- along H r-.-'-QF -^T, laRawcM CITY of ORON' Post Office Box 66 • Crysul Bay. Minnesota 55323 • Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka March 21/ 1990 Bonesiroo, Sosene, Andeclik S Assoc. 2335 Hicihway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 Glenn Cook Dear Glenn:Gienn: I have enclosed a ^j"AoUl=t”iiSnu“."%hVn^ aoDllcation dot che property locanec - ^ the impact on tne “c|-n«rn o t-il^norKr^sultina from the development o. existing drainage ^acix- ^ rhis proper^iy.oroperT^y. .. i ^ aPororii°te “h«%rpr"?drdrr:c'J?ln"re^«^li^^^e cnac yv-»u ------------ m • ^ intorinaciun muou «rr--------- ^ 2. Are there drainage catch basin to' north fesl^Ti\"'ls ?o“c\%^ir?nln^1r^v^/te“A 3 What is your concern if ?rnl«sVa1:y f«”the irnirlVMircVp“r%^eftrbVdVd%Vt%-^ area for the dtaiange easement.dtaiange • , -i , 1990 t would ask that you AS I will be out of town Hilbelink at 85 Golden “ 3\^heetir,'in^Vrl^"" |f?Sn“a dVad?i*ne"for lub" tfa! or”r^vised plans of April 6, 1990.lime i.oc ^ ^ in my absence Hilbllin'k"by Vhone (Home 476-1861 6 applicant's suveyor, please contact nr. Mock 475-2411). BUILOING * ZOMING - 473-7357 assessing administration 4 nX^NCE - 473-735* FAX-473-0510 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 i ! Glenn Cook March 21, 1990 Page 2 of 2 for the March meeting of the Planning commission. Building s Zoning Administrator JAM/jb cc* Michael Hilbelink, 85 Golden View Drive, Long Lake, MN 55356 Phil Nelson, All Metro Land Surveyors, 2340 Daniels Street, Long Lake, MN 55356 ■ i I : i ! ii I UHfidiSbUMiaUMMWtiai o if I Bonestroo m LM Rosene |t=5 Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects Ono G Pf Pot>eft W Rojeoe. PE x>iepnC Aivjeh* PE RiCh^J 6 Tumei PE j4<wC OJwjn PE Genn ff Cook PE T^'onias E ^4oy^ PE G Schuncw. PE Vyrvm L SotvJtt PE A G<yOon. PE R<na«J W Poster PE OonakJC Bmgardt PE Jerry A Bomoon. PE Mark A Haoion PE Ted K F-^d. PE Micnaci r Paoimarn PE Soocn fl PVfc^ie PE OavO O Loskota PE Thomas W Pwrrvjn PE Mcnafi C Lyrxrn. PE 0 PE James R Maiarxj PE Thomas R Anderw a i a tcenr>eth P Anoajoo. Pi Gary P R/aooef._PE MarH R fioRJ. Pt RoCertC Russek Thcmai E Arxx He^aro A Sarr Oan^ J Edged Mark A Se<x PE pfv»«o J Cassk<e«. PE U paBr!fiR^ ». PE CuCS^ 'ftoion acS^^ Susan M tOer»en. C PA MAR 2 8 1990 March 26, 1990 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attns Jeanne Mabusth Re: File No. 139 Mike Hilbelink 2180 Prospect Ave. Dear Jeanne, The Hilbelink property should have f“*2r^foo^ ^drainage easement. brnr^fuirg ri^e roSrdraUe easement except to provide positive drainage as agreed to by the City. If you have any questions, please contact this office Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK St ASSOCIATES. INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC;li cc: John Gerhardson 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul. Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 1 Civ%P IS C»v\p Ai*iio4 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 4 ASSOC, INC. CONSULTING INCINEERS St. Paul, Minntsota Client Onu»Jc Project cia'tSTai.. r./AV Prepared By Vr> c 'w Pagt 1 Proj. No. Oott lO/-) /. Oatt ^— Q o Ac* dCwU- U^liiC rx A-A -- ----- / BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOC, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS St. faui, Minntseta Cliant 0,1 POQ« € Proiact r./v^T/M liWV Proj. No. n«it Colculafiont For ^ DiTd#-l Prtparod By K^6L^Ooto Oolt . , . Prepored for! Rrwlted 3/lfc/OO <o shout aofl drt\n\^<\c^. ^ y G»T*a«. /i;i V///////Ai CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY MIKE HILDELINK *-------— Dcn*4»S •nUlirta e»nU</r — — (gjj-----pr«p«Mc< contoar sto^m %tM%r K|Ol. ^ fropoicd ea^ !l - :vvv>‘{ '-Vir n.--’fc'V^:rt . Mi * «*-4 fisri<n lo7.2 t Nn.e “7 (ot.fc PROSPER •iS^ •;i V ^ ■ ■'■i'i.'r-:-- $ LEGAL DESCRIPTION; Ml that part of the Northeast Quarter of the South- v/est Quarter of Section 10, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as follows: Beginning at a point on the west lino of tin- Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quar:er of said Section 10 515.625 feet north of the southv;est corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 130.00 feet; thence East 208.00 feet; thence South 130.00 feet; thence West 203.00 feet to the point of beginning. GENERAL NOTES (T (D o Denotes iron monument Denotes cross chiseled in concrete < 939.7 Denotes existing spot elevation 1 9391 Denotes .voposed spot elevotlon < --------- Denotes surface drainage Dashed contour tines denotes proposed features Solid contour lines denotes existing features Proposed top of foundation elevation ~ I®**-® Proposed basement floor elevation = Proposed garage floor elevation - |0C.6 BENCHMARK: Inv. o< sUrm C a US brtSin near NW rorner ot ftUve. propr, I y . AsvimM - Ino.o ALL-METRO LAND I htrtby ctrtify that Ihit turvty, plan or roport was prtparod by mo or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the Stole of Minnesota.SURVEYORS 2340 Doniels Street Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Ph: 475-1433 DATE _ FILE NO. Wife A Michael Hilbelink 85 Golden View D^i'/o Lon^ Lake/ Minn« 55356 March 14/ 1?90 Jean Mabusth City of Orono p.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay/ Minn. 55323 OIVQF ML MAR 1 !4 1880 Re: Lot at 2180 Prospect Ave Regarding the lot application on the property at 2180 Proapeet, I do not have building piano as such. My orxgrnai intent was to move a 1-500 sq. £t. onto to the lot. I have since abandoned those ^l^n^. I at this point, do not know i or someone else will a a spec, home on the property. I have provided a foot print of a home that I fuel would fit nicely on that lot. I do realize that if this is approved, that what ever is submitted in the future will have to be built within those set backs. I hope this answers your questions. I can be reached at H 476-1667 or W 475-2411. Thank you. .spec t f u rV lelink I NEIL D. HEIKKILA & ASSOCIATES, LTD. ATTORNEYS AT LAW NCIL D. HEIKKILA or COUNICL RONALD J. JOHNSON NORWCSr BANK BUILOINQ 10 11 SOUTH FIRST STREET • SUITE 430 HOPKINS. MINNESOTA SS343 (612)935-2265 MAILING ADDRESS P O.BOX 5445 HOPKINS. MINNESOTA April 12, 1990 City of Orono ATTENTION: Planning Commission and City Council P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 APR 1 e RE:Adgenda Item 1502, Michael Hilbelink Request For Approvals and Variances to Construct a New Residence at 2180 Prospect Avenue Dear Planning Commission and City Council Members: I am writing to you on behalf of my clients, Alex J. and Dianne F. Jentilucci, who live at 1295 Briar Street. Their home abutts the 2180 Prospect Avenue (Hilbelink) property. As my clients, and their neighbors, Bob and Janet Johnson, have indicated previously, they have substantial concerns regarding the proposed building plan for the property. My clients object to the granting of the variance as now requested. Key concerns include the following: (a) Mr. Hilbelink proposes to place the structure on a location other than the site of the former residence. As evidenced by the property address (2170 Prospect Avenue), the former residence was situated toward the back of the lot and closer to Prospect Avenue. The proposed placement of the new residence would result in the structure being closer to the Jentilucci lot line and Briar Street, and in effect becoming a Briar Street residence as opposed to a Prospect Avenue residence. The new structure, which is substantially larger than the old residence, is proposed to be built in an area which had been lower in the past but was filled at the time work was being done on the Crystal Bay sewer project. ur concern is that placement of the structure will result in even more fill and run off toward tha Jentilucci property. (b) As Mr. and Mrs. Jentilucci and Mr. and Mrs. Johnson note in their letter of March 19, 1990, to you, the existing drainage ditch was not sufficient to avoid the Jentilucci and Johnson homes being threatened by flood waters. We fear that the proposed construction and the landscaping which will be necessitated, will result in even more drainage of water toward the Jentilucci lot line and the existing drainage ditch. (c) As you may be aware, the existing drainage ditch is within the Jentilucci property. No easement has been taken by the City of City of Orono Page Two April 12, 1990 Orono. Yet, that drainage ditch is used to collect waters from other properties, and connects to the tile line on the "Ned Dayton" property. We understand that the City does have an easement for the drain tile through that property. It appears evident that the existing drainage system, the drainage ditch through the Jentilucci property connecting with the Dayton drain tile system is not adequate during periods of heavy rain. Under a letter of agreement issued by your city attorneys, on behalf of the City of Orono, dated July 26, 1985, the city agreed to make such repairs as were required on the tile line on the Dayton property. (d) It is our position that the Planning Commission and the City Council should not grant the variance as presently proposed. My clients would consider withdrawing their objections if th^‘> location of the proposed new structure were closer to the old site; if there were enforceable provisions that precluded any further change in lot elevations; and if the city would secure an easement over the drainage ditch in the Jentilucci property; and would enlarge the drainage systems so as to be able to handle larger quantities of water. We understand that the city may benefit from the sale of the property, there being assessments against the property, in favor of the city. But, we object to the 2180 Prospect Avenue property being improved at the expense of neighboring property and property owners. The city has set minimum lot sizes and set back requirements and should not grant a variance from same, where granting of said variance in all probability cause harm to adjoining properties. My clients have worked hard and invested funds to improve their property and are most concerned that the city permi; no action which would put their property and its value in jeopardy. We believe it is possible to improve the adjoining premises (2180 Prospect Avenue), but only if actions are taken to avoid changes in elevation and to improve the capability of the existing drainage system to handle the flowage. We suggest that no action be taken with respect to approval of the variance until satisfactory arrangements can be made with same. Thank you for your consideration. Please provide notice to me and to Mr. and Mrs. Jentilucci of any and all City Council and/or Planning Commission meetings involving the subject matter. Sincerely yours, HELKKIL<( ASSOCIATES, LTD. ikkila IDH:dlk cc: Mr. and Mrs. Alex J. Jentilucci Mr. and Mrs. Bob Johnson i CITY of ORONO CITY Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323•Munidpal OfS< QF ORONa On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka April Hr 1990 Mr. S Mrs. Alex Jentilucci 1295 Briar Street Wayzata, MN 55391 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Jentilucci; meeting. prior to scheduling the Hilbelink application before the sioilTaV'the llty"\nXel“Si!l aratHhi theie^la the south. Please contact my office if you have any questions concerning the statements made in this letter. Sincerely Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator JAM/tin CCS Glenn Cook# City Engineer John Gerhardson, Public Works Director Mark Bernhardson City Administrator BCSLOiNG & ZONING - 473-7357 ASSESSING administration a FI.NANCE - 473-7355 FAX-4734WI0 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 To;Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: April 12, 1990 #1508 Donald Olson, 4590 North Arm Drive - Variance/Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning District -* LR-lA, Single family lakeshore residential, 2 acre minimum, unsewered Application - Request for conditional use permit to keep up to 2 horses on the property and to house such horses in an existing structure less than the required 75' from the side lot line. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit C D E F G Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Air Photo Staff Sketch, Allowable Animal Barn Locations Code Section 10.20, Subd 3 (M) & (N) Pertinent Facts - 1.This property contains approximately 5.49 acres total, less .09 acre for North Arm Drive, and less approximately .02 acre for the travelled portion of North Arm Lane (which for most of its length is a privately owned road outlot maintained by the City). Net resulting lot area is 5.38 acres. 2.The LR-IA zone allows animals as a conditional use rather than as an accessory use. A copy of the animal conditional use regulations Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (M) and (N), is attached. In general, those regulations require: A) At least 3 acres in total to have 1 horse, and 1 acre for each additional horse. Such acreage must be dry buildable land. C) Any accessory building used to house horses for non-commercial purposes must be located at least 75' from all lot lines and at least 150' from neighboring residences. 3.Applicant requests to keep 1 or 2 horses. The total 5.38 acres would normally be limited to a maximum of 3 horses. Zoning File #1508 April 12, 1990 Page 2 of 4 4. The survey indicates that the fenced "corral” area is approximately 5' from the west lot line» 10' from the north lot line, and about 25'-30' from the east lot line abutting North Arm Lane. The code does not require a lot line setback for such a pasture area. 5. If applicant constructs a new accessory building to house horses, such a building could easily meet the necessary 75' setbacks from lot lines and 150' setbacks from existing neighboring residences. All existing neighboring residences are 150' or more from applicant's lot lines. 6. Applicant has noted that until such future time that a horse barn is constructed, there would not necessarily be a fully enclosed horse shelter constructed. Prom discussions with the applicant, staff concludes that the applicant's plans may include temporary housing of horses in the existing canopied area attached to the garage on the property, south of the house. This structure consists of a 20x28' garage and adjacent 28x25' canopy, located 24' from the west lot line and approximately 225' from the adjacent residence structure to the west. However, this garage and attached canopy also are located closer to the street than applicant's residence and staff would make the interpretation based on Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D), that any modification to this existing structure will require a separate variance application. Note also that the garage structure is 581 square feet, with the canopy being 713 square feet for a total of 1,294 square feet. Enclosure of the canopy area would make this an oversized accessory structure, and would therefore also require execution of the required covenant per the recently amended accessory structures ordinance. At 5+ acres, this property would be allowed, via the accessory structure ordinance conditions, 1 accessory structure up to 2,200 square feet, and additional other accessory structures totalling no more than an additional 2,200 square feet. Therefore, should the applicant wish to construct a separate horse barn or loafing shed near the pasture area, it woul appear very feasible to do so. 7. The applicant has suggested for the first few years, horses might be only kept on the property during the summer, hence construction of a permanent barn that meets all code requirements might not occur for a while. Zoning File #1508 April 12, 1990 Page 3 of 4 Discussion ~ Given the nature of the existing garage and canopy, and Its location near a lot line and between the house and the street, staff would recommend that this structure not be allowed for housing of animals, either on a temporary or a permanent basis. The structure is in such condition that the applicant has in the past approached staff about tearing it down and rebuilding on the same foundation. He has been told this would require variances. There would appear to be adequate area in which to construct a barn or loafing shed that meets all setback and location requirements. The applicant has not suggested whether he would revise the fenced pasture areas. Nothing in the code prohibits him from using additional areas anywhere on the property for pasture. As of this writing, staff has received no comments from neighboring property owners regarding the application. Note that the boundary between the LR-IA and RR-lB districts follows the west property boundary. That boundary was defined along the quarter section line when the zoning districts were layed out in 1975. The property is located approximately 900' from the dredged channel abutting North Arm, and approximately 1,800' from the lake proper. Hardcover and runoff to the lake are not significant factors in the application. Staff Recomnendation - Absent any comments from neighboring property owners, staff would recommend approval of the conditional use permit to keep up to 2 horses on the property, finding that the lot has adequate acreage, and finding that a suitable structure for housing of the proposed horses can be constructed to meet all required setbacks, as follows: 75' from all property lines; 150' from any neighboring residence structure; no closer to North Arm Drive than the existing residence structure on the property. A diagram indicating the allowable locations is attached as Exhibit F. 1. 2. 3. Zoning File #1508 April 12, 1990 Page 4 of 4 Planning Commission would have to find unique and unusual circumstances about the existing garage/canopy building and its location in order to justify a recommendation for approval of its use for animal housing. Additionally, applicant should be further advised that any modifications to enclose the canopy structure for any purpose would necessarily require location variances as well as being subject to the oversized accessory structure ordinance provisions. :i { . Ii I ■ f t L < f r CITY OP ORONO - G yr N ^ /■ ENERAL LMI& UOT^APPLltlSriOB^— ;0S' PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ______V^90 hJof^TU >Z^V£^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) cm OF orm i -rv5ftW CFFICE 1F002VVQOO - Q1 £EV £±lLld2£d£°£J^]imFrFrmM"1^1(03/6 CCOl hi fl6: 02/27/ Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name C. OJso/J Address /Ootr-h/\ Phone (home) _Phone (work) ^«^V-<3 S*6> / City /TJifi/AJtP Zip SS'36>*/ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Soyy^£ a.s a^on/^ Address Phone (home) Phone _ _ _ _ City _ _ _ Zip Date Pr^erjiy Acquired _ _ _I 9^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) I (do) (^o notj^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. PEES - CONDITIONAL DSE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee t $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling *" designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling “ 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Appeals Other - see fee schedule A % PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY!MT US>1S or Jt'KUFJiKTI } p . Present Zoning District IA Present Use of Property _ _ _ _Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: / 2_ _ _hjr, . S?. >-)0 /cg. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. REQUIRED SnitMITTALS 1. Completf.d Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been Included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or. requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the Information supplied is true and correct to'^he best of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's signature Date Q Cy OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acJcnowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and v^ws^ficati<^^f this request. Owner's signature Date 3 ~~ 3 ~ 7 CP ^ •• ^ ^ •• •• « • M w ^ mam mam mm mam mm « mm ^ mm mam mm ^ mm mm mm mm mmm aam^ mmmmmmm ^ ma ^ mm ^ mm mm ^ mm mm m mm mm mm mm mm atm mm mm mm Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days- .afore the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are it* • on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at al' duled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an «-rt'li'Jnt is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements tc nave an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. » WTT>07.«- ■ - ■ . ---------------- ^ • ........................ c» -//7-2. u.- •.. , .. ...^....v,. ^ . , .. •>9.4/ 7 :^9.9 1 rt.TT *4 f » i.li4 i4a ‘5a*C2‘t O' •(6) £ 4C2.Q6 4^r.d6 4 ^L ^18? seSOMB ^Bl (10) 363k I (II) US' 810.9) 1 A V5 I FOURTH 4?S45 ^.^3—itf o/ sfmru Am isrATss 1 ,.'. I3I. Ij St L S • • • m • . . • •. 1 «-4 O S «.r M ' * *• ^ y “V M *•1 J!} . 1 \ K Antenna Structure. One independent antenna structure with antenna or combination of antenna attached theret , suborSliate to and servicing the principal use or structure on tht same lot and customarilynot attached to another structure provided the height of the antenna structure does not exceed 65 feet and the antenna structure is set back from any lot line a distance at least equal to the total height of the antenna structure. L. Farms - (Crop and Stock). Provided that the area is ten or more acres. The keeninci of domestic animals for non~ f cimai^rri purposes including horses for the use of the L__—tt^^oMnts of the premises. A minimum of one acre in aggregate, exclusive of one acre for the must-be available for each animal unit, except as hereinafter set forth. A minimum of two acres of open oniuJe must be available for a single horse and one acre must be available for each additional horse. 5hei rt“hoS« «e kept stabled and do not require pasture for feed purposes, the minimum pasture requirement adiusted at the discretion of the Council. Such minimum oasture acreage shall not include low lying lands unusable ?or pasturT^r grazin,. Any person must comply with the provisions of the City Code. and is hereby 2imended by adding the following; M qtaliles and Barns - Private. The use of an accessory bij^^g for keeping animals for n,°n-commercial P^^P°®|® ^Cr^tded it is for the non~coromercial use of the property SSner or resiLnt and meets the available area standards SuSlined in Paragraph « fee“t from tSe such structure shall be located less than feet from nearest adjacent residence and no closei than 75 the nearest lot line. ft stables and Barns - Public. The use of accessory SVJrcrur!^lT/“be 1^^ - nearest lot line. P Riding Academy. Any such instruction ®\Je^ j r*onducted bv th6 ownGT shall rnoet: JequiremVnts of Sections M, N^, and 0 of this su^^^ Sd°^en\^re%\7e'nVe°"or=‘leii ^h^^nS^fVet fro™ the nearest lot line. o •sJ py u. c\ S 10.20 service structures is compatible to the neighborhood in which it is to be located and thus will promote the general welfare. E. Greenhouses. Commercial greenhouses provided all outside storage is fenced in such a manner so as to screen the stored material from view when observed from the public street or adjoining lot. Recreation Areas. Private gun clubs, archery ranges, riding^'ffcables, ski slides, provided the area is fenced and no part of the principal use is less than 100 feet from any lot line. (G^ Guest Houses. A separate dwelling constructed on an existing undivided lot for the sole use of the occupants of- the principal buildings, including their domestic employees or their non-paying guests. All regular lot requirements shall be met by the guest house. H. Planned Residential Development. Limited to detached single family dwellings only and subject to the limitations of Section 10.32. r.,. tp. 3 - ‘ I. Duplex Credit. One duplex may be located on a single lot as a conditional use upon application therefor provided that public sanitary sewer service is available, and the lot is adjacent to a commercial or industrial district, and the duplex is constructed within 200 feet of the commercial or industrial district. A duplex is defined as a two-family unit residential building. non-comme -Jice (ovJC«A£A1^) K.) Animals. The keeping^er domestic animals lor purpospg inc 1 ml inn ^ITnr in n for the use of the occupants of the premises^ provided that any accessory building used for housing such animals shall be located not less than 150 feet from the nearest lot line. A minimum of one acre in aggregate, exclusive of one acre for the principal building, must be available for each animal unit, except as hereinafter set forth. A minimum of two acres of open pasture must be available for a single horse and one additional acre must be available for each additional horse. When the horses are kept stabled and do not require pasture for feed purposes, the minimum pasture requirement may be adjusted at the discretion of the Council. Such minimum pasture acreage shall not include low lying lands unusable for pasture or grazing. Any person keeping such animals must comply with the provisions of the City Code. (cA/cateWP) L.y Farms (Crop). Provided that the area is ten or more acres. Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 ORONO CC 280 (4-1-84) r •» To: From Date Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusthr Building & Zoning Administrator April 11, 1990 Subject: #1509 Earl L. Freeman, 4545 Watertown Road - Variances ~ Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-IA Required area = 5 acres Existing total area = 5.76 acres Original area prior to construction of McCulley Rd ■ 7.91 acres Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (A) - No accessory structure can remain on a property that does not contain a principal residence. The previous residence was removed in October 1989 (control burn by Maple Plain Fire Department) as a result of the Hazardous Building Action by the City. The Hazardous Building Action included the former residence and other accessory structures in similar state of disrepair. The subject structure, approximately 2,400+ square feet in area, is in excellent condition. Applicant has been advised of the necessary variance to allow the structure to remain on the property without a principal residence. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C) - Accessory structure ordinance. a) Allowed area - oversized accessory structure: Allowed 5-6 acres » 2,200 s.f. Existing * 2,400+ s.f. b) Required setbacks: Front/rear required ■* 100' Existing » 200'+ Side required ** 50' Existing « 100'+ Section 10.03, Subdivision 3 (C)(3)(C) 1 - Future subdivision that place oversized accessory structure on lot that does not contain principal residence may be allowed to remain for a finite period of time. Zoning File #1509 April 11, 1990 Page 2 of 3 List of Brhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit K Application Property Owners List Plat Map 1-D2 Section Maps Oman's Letter 1/1/90 Building Permit #3093 for Accessory Structure 6/27/75 Council Minutes 6/24/75 Survey Review of Application - As a result of the above referenced harardous building action, the existing accessory structure is in violation of the Zoning Code and requires variance approval if it is allowed to remain. A permit was issued for the construction of the accessory structure in 1975 and is approximately 2,400+ square feet in area. In 1975, an accessory structure classified as a barn or stable could exceed 1,000 square feet. A permit was specifically issued for stable use. The Code in 1975 would have required a 150' setback from all property lines. Note the survey shows less than the 150' setback from the east and west side lot lines. On June 24, 1975 the City approved setback variances for the proposed barn structure. The applicant has advised because of his business committments out of state, that he will be unable to build his own residence on the property, but plans to offer the property for sale. It is hoped that the City will allow him to keep the accessory structure for the future owner of the site. The subject structure is not used as a barn, but serves as a storage building. Applicant should provide information as to the current use. Is it rented for storage use, or does owner use it for storage? The City should ask for confirmation during the interim period that there is appropriate insurance coverage on the subject structure. In recent years, it would appear that the structure has not been used as an accessory use for the renters of the residence on the property, but as accessory storage for the owner who lived off-site. If the applicant is granted variance approval, it will be necessary for the applicant to designate a local person or agent responsible for the maintenance and supervision of the structure. It should be noted for the record that staff has never received complaints from adjacent neighbors regarding the use of this structure, nor has staff ever observed any traffic on the site. Applicant should provide Information as to what is stored within the building. i r ^|wriiiiiiT' T" Zoning File #1509 Anril 11, 1990 3 age 3 of 3 Staff has received no comments from the neighbors notified for this variance review. Options of Action - 1. 2. Denial, refer to Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A) for necessary findings for denial and recommend a date for removal of the accessory structure. Approval. Planning Commission may consider some of the following findings: A) The existing residence was removed as a result of a hazardous building action creating a violation on the subject property. B) The subject structure is in good structural condition and satisfies the setback standards for an oversized accessory structure based on the recent code amendment. C) Applicant has made payment for all fees incurred during the hazardous building action and all real estate taxes, etc. are up to date. Approval is subject to the following condition: 1. Applicant shall provide proof of liability insurance and designate local agent responsible for structure as applicant lives out of state. 2. No housing of animals allowed during duration of variance. 3. Storage shall be limited to the following items: a. agricultural equipment b. seed, fertilizer, plant materials c. other items recommended by Planning Commission d. What would Planning Commission recommend against? or no storage use during effective period of variance. 4. Applicant should be placed on notice that it has been the policy to limit such variance applications to one year or less, depending on the use or type of structure under consideration. ■ ^ M « CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.no (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) ^ i ' ■ ■ :N "T?/.- , i ■ •;jf ..X 1^ PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address lAJfZTO(Al1^'^,_______________ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) "S/-//T- <3-J • r-. MAR-7 CIT( OF DR&O rnim .Q1 CBi 175.00 CHSX TL 175.00 r<ECEiPT-rmK you Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Phone (home) 70^ ~ '0 0 F PAPPLICANT Name i i • Address; ^7~. OWNER (if different than applicant) Name __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ Address:_ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ Phone (worJc) 3?2, 0 0 City: Zip: C> Phone (home)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ Phone (wor)c)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ City:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Zip:_ _ _ _ _— Date Property Acquired _ _ _^ 7 ^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) I (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: VARIANCES REQUIRED Estimated Construction Cost $ HAROS.ilP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty^resui^ting from strictDescribe undue hardship or practical difficulty resul enforcement of zoning recmlations.: C.i4^ /vt-AAtAyu^ fts/ i ^^9*^G»«V~gC^ DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .Ic. @ 5. 6. 7. 8. UIRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). M Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this applicationr please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A NORKING COPY (ll" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete If the above inforaation has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete Initialed by Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator/ agrees to pay additional fees (staff tiioa not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application/ and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature /UU/yy-^Date J. ONNER& SIGNATURE The ownoT hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff/ consultants/ agentS/ Commission members/ and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date J ^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Plannini Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting/ please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. i I ^ 4 ^ • 4 ■ •V G)S •; 4I ooo Hi \ ro cT « A U M Ci3 H S Mto s 3u» oo• • m CO X H O H H < CO H £O t^o>z M j-> to Dto D < COsa >1o M o 4*^^V* r^’i.'■. * **i*; •.■ • *.! d4• ^ -•• . • I 1 X CO Q •• Z CO X M CO OS ^ U Cl4= s S u B X M u5S wss CM CO CO X CX4 Xs X CO (0 §oc o (0 .-I (0 X X X Cl4 X < X zo do lu CO < o X XM Xo CO M X o M o X CO M X H z M o H Q CO X X X Ut CO X ^ -o (0 rH fd 0) cd o J2 *H *0 t! C ^ S X X H ^ ^ i O 0,^5 ^ £ £ >1 S 4p C m r-4 m O C m O 0) d) £ C (M -P ‘H O CO 0> :s X >v -PgOz .p 0) 0> <M o 0)c •ri CM X CO to (d g 0) rH 4J rH to O 0) C m 5 .. • » .' ■.■ ■ ■■ ■ ■■ • ; I ro CM 0) X 4^ 0> 4^ 0) to CO Q) C 0) C m cd :* X vO o 4^ 4-> O C7> *0 0) d) C7\ C <D J3- (d C m ^ O O C-i O 0)00 P d) rH O CO 0) »- C m O to P cS Scp 3c O d>jC ro P 4^ CM Xto o *H O to Cm in c ^oc (d >* E 'V. X *H 5 ^rn u (d •> 0) t«4^ x: £ *o -o (0 4> P o 0) U d 0)o o c *H z CO ;H t- <D rH O X 00 0) w i> r- x: td o »- P *o (m C m o O. o dO •H O C >> ^ >>rH 3 rH J- O U _ 0) «• X p CO - 3 - r- O X o 0) m CO p J= X t-i Pp c to o o c z x: X .H *H p OP >» bO*H o rH C 3 4j d) P {3'^ O* *H iH O *0 *0 rH p mH c ^ rt •sr u <fl ^a d)o to*o dT S p > CO U rH (d D td »H ^ ^ ^c P O P o 5 w c rH c p o d) <d (d d) ^ H ^ P -H OP to P ^ •. S »H c (d r- m -o d) _ ¥*S = M(d c c td *H C • (d td p Q o o r- p c^ r- tot- c ,a o <M •iH rH O X Cd CO P 00 O d)toc c *H d) P to (d c c •H JT m p *5 ^c p (d d) P C m CO d) p (d Vi)o o c « d) O O W)C m CO «H cX p c o X p a rH 00 m X O ^ <D CCS • CO P O CO ^ti z p rn s o0) qm d) m m c c C m O d) r- X* *H L. O C m rH O C m C m - O W d) ON O *o C P CM CM *H P ^ • 2 ^ JSCd m o o CO 3 r- iH CO cr m *o -ST "O *— cd c 4j u X (d to L. d) (d 3 0) X P p d) X p 3 to >» ^ P - O d) d) rH Cd t* Pn s 3 u o d)” 3 5 d) boz o to P P C C m to D to -H d) ^ (d o td > o in CO d) (d c oo c X X d) • g CD p JO X t. -P to C P O P t; c o z W •‘CM 4h C m (d Cc d) o d) d) vo as c X CM g •H C d) C P >to d) C d) - u o X -H X O ^ 3 CQ p rH P CO O o p (d m d) p cd 3 P •fH OQ * t -Oc (d C m O G> U d) X p >» d) >u D CO pc 0)scu d) >oo CO d) p cd p • ^ 5 f i'vT; •o o . ■ ■ •■•-.'■; •• •.' •• •• ■; d) CO • p d) *. ••H c c c X - p >% p o c P D faOU •M C •o *H U Ow O d) 8 irt « X rH rH C < •ri • r • • H Osm ^ Ma. s| i S! V.rv t\i N UJ o^ o m !! M O K »0 « CM UJ I K Oseo u % CM Ooo M c)(/^ M CM K) CM I flO K K UJ Ul M Mr r K UJ COo in M < o o lO O fOo CD O K> O A* O K B X X o u ►H M oe B UJ B ^ *3 & CM »- CM (/) CO u inooo M in in CM m CM CO inm K1 CM Io Ul B O O< tlss V < CD I U. U. «J M O O «n < m CO K> > > ^ cn « O M M b B JO O U U CD u Is “s CM Q s c* in JO in in JO B CM UJ » j- © «H X iH I M JO in UJ Ul UJ Ul B B IrU U. © ^ JO o iii^H Z B M UJ < H -i ga UJ in -j sT a in < z ^ ^ ^ in B BB B «( < UJ UJ r .*• — i-4» t- - ; i: 1 i..V sos 9^oo Xo s I VI § h. «J o S ® o <s = ^ JO B Ho in O' in JO in in CO S 5^ o o I U !o in S •H e < CO o JO O H tl B 2M o r 8 X z -J < JH^ cr < <C O -I X © a UJ < O UJ £ in a o ^ < ^ O’ Z UJ B B Z o O \ B < UJ S«?> =Ba M UJ aiC K (/) UJ VB UJ X ^ UJ B ^u aUl u a M B O O CITY OF ORONO CITY of ORONO Post Office Bo* 66*CryeUl Bey, MinnesoU 55323*Munidpel Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka January 1990 Earl L. Freenan P.O. Box 685 Lemonl:/ IL 60439 Re: 4545 Watertovm Road, Orono Dear Mr. Freeman, The City of Orono would like to thank you ?S?rie?leria to^nfora, you that frrSot '■r^eVe?veT^Ve‘'iltTrA;nrer U Matter to the City attorney for assessment against the property. The City ia also concerned »hput the pole barn that is^l^^ gSilSinWut Mabusth in the Zoning Department about thxs matter. the aJfvra\a^\Yne*Tlere“fi:i"%r%%io’^«nS:c7 Sincerely, Lyle Oman, Senior Building Inspector LO/jb cc: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning & Building A»3ministrator BUILDING & ZONING - 473-7357 ASSESSING ADMLNISTRATION & HNANCE - 473-7358 FAX-47341510 PUBLIC ^'ORKS - 4^3-7359 mr- •T*iTO ■Vi RTSiT.i* ::• iXf > A- 33>.o<> /^«o O loohama UTO HiiTH kTI 0^ OCCUTAlCr OMO ORONO COUNjCIy 14EETING HELD JUNE 24, 1975 Welsh mo^d/ Paurus seconded, to refer toe North Slrorer Marina building permit to toe PlMning^^nmission for study. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0)• Page 4 NORTH SHORE MARINA Building Permit • • Paurus moved, Welsh seconded, to extend North Shore Drive marina license to July 8, 1975. Motion,Ayes (5) - Nays (0). MARINA LICENSE North Shore Drive Paurus moved, Welsh seconded, to extend North Star Marina license to July 8, 1975. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Paurus moved, Welsh seconded, to -'xtend Gayle's Marina license to July 8, 1975. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). MARINA LICENSE North Star Marina MARINA LICENSE Gayle's Marina Mr. Henry Muhich, Zoning and Building Administrator, STREET VACATION presented a status report regarding vacation of 505 Orchard Park Road street right-of-way for Robert Eckert, 505 Orchard Peurk Road. Welsh moved, Butler seconded, to approve a variance for a front auid side yard setbacks for Richard Petrin, 1520 Long Lake Boulevard. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Welsh moved, Butler seconded, to approve a conditional use permit and variance for Robert Compton, 4545 Watertown Road, for a sttole and hobby farm. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Paurus moved, Butler seconded, to approve a vcuriance for lot area and width for Audrey Overby, 567 Park Lane, subject to: 1. Submitting a survey. 2. Removing existing structxire. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Butler moved, Welsh seconded, to approve a lot • split of LoL 61 emd combination of remaining --'Lot 61 emd Li t 62 as one parcel and waiving ■ Chapter 39 and 10% park dedication fees, subject to: Survey being filed. VARIANCE 1520 Long LaUce Boulevard CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT S VARIANCE 4545 VJatertown Road VARIANCE 567 Park Lane LOT SPLIT & COMBINATION 100 Orono Orchard Rd. s 95 Smith Ave. To:Planning Commission Chnirman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:April 4, 1990 Subject: #1510 Richard W. Brown# 2685 Shadywood Road - Guest Apartment Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing List Zoning District - LR-IB, Single family lakeshore residential, 1 acre Application - Request for conditional use permit to construct a guest apartment addition to the existing residence. of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application & Letter of Request Exhibit B - Plat Map - Property Owners List - Survey/Proposed Site Plan - Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Submitted by Applicant - Staff Hardcover Calculations - Proposed Floor Plans/Elevation Views - Letter of Request from Applicant - Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (G) ii - Air Photo, May 1989 Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit C D E Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit F G H I J Pertinent Facts - 1. The applicants are selling the house to their son, who will be residing in the house full time. The applicants would be living in the guest apartment during the six months of the year in which they will live in Minnesota. 2.Applicants had Intended to meet the hardcover limitation of 25% in the 75-250' zone. The only hardcover in the 0-75' zone is a 290 s.f. portion of an existing boat house, equal to just over 1% hardcover in the 0—75' zone. In the 75—250' zone, a staff calculation of hardcover indicates there is currentl 28.1% existing hardcover. If no removals occur outside the areas of the new addition, this will increase to 32.8%. There are areas of landscaping, patio, a shed and excess driveway next to the new garage, that could be removed. This could result in a net 75-250' decrease from 28.1% down to 27.8%. Hardcover Sumnary: 0-75' 75-250' Existing 290 s.f. (1.1%) 6,861 s.f. (28.1%) Proposed Same 7,999 s.f. (32.8%) Possible If Removals Occur Same 6,782 s.f. (27.8%) I 'VU Zoning File #1510 April 4, 1990 Page 2 of 3 3.The guest house conditional use permit section of the code [Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (G)] was revised in early 1987 to distinguish between guest houses which must meet all regular lot requirements and guest apartments, which have specific requirements for access, utilities and usage. A copy of that section is attached. 4.Technically, an average lakeshore setback variance is required for this addition. This property has the characteristics of a peninsula because it abuts the lake on the west side and a lagoon to the north (see attached May 1989 air photo). Discussion - I would first refer Planning Commission to the attached copy of Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (G) - ii. "Non-rental guest apartments." The applicant's request appears to meet most of the conditions prescribed for such an apartment, as follows: A) the intended use of the apartment is for the non-paying relatives (parents) of the future owner, and is not intended for rental use; B) an additional 2-stall garage is being provided, hence parking concerns are addressed; C) sewage treatment is not a concern because this is a sewered area, and the applicants intend to maintain the utilities as part of the main house, and not sepf.rately metered. Access to the proposed guest apartment can be gained via a number of doorways. There is a single doorway from the new garage with access directly to the apartment. A walkout glass door is proposed on the lakeside on the lower level. A glass sliding door will lead to the existing upper level deck. There will be an access door to the store room above the existing garage. The entrance to the main body of the house is via the proposed kitchen through an existing "entry hall" to the family room. Given the nature of the existing entry hall and the storage area above the garage, it is arguable whether the proposed access layout strictly meets the intent of the code in that "there shall be at least one access door to the apartment from within the principal structure, and such door shall be the primary access to the apartment" (emphasis added). One could argue that the new garage entrance will act strictly as the primary access, and that the entry hall access on the lower level acts merely as a foyer between two totally separate units. On the other hand, the obvious shared use of the upper level deck helps to integrate the use of the apartment into the main residence use. Zoning File #1510 April 4r 1990 Page 3 of 3 Staff Recoamendation - Planning Commission should address the following issues in its recommendation to the Council; 1. Is the existing access layout acceptable? Does it meet the Intent of the Code in providing primary access to the apartment from within the principal structure? 2. Should a hardcover variance be granted to allow a 75- 250* increase from 28.1% to 32.8%, or should excess hardcover be removed to result in an overall reduction? 3. Does Planning Commission have any concerns with the granting of an average setback variance? Will this addition have any significant impact on neighboring properties? If the above Issues can be resolved, staff would recommend approval subject to the following additional standard guest apartment conditions : 1. The second dwelling unit is allowed as a guest apartment only, to be used for relatives and non-paying guests of the property owners. The unit may not be rented out. 2. The two family dwelling or guest apartment use shall cease at such time the current applicants/owners no longer own the property. Any subsequent property owner would have to reapply for this type of use or remove the kitchen facilities. 3. Utilities shall not be separated but shall be metered jointly with the principal residence. 4. The guest apartment shall not have a separate street address. f 5 M “I JSF APPE1C7PPI0& ** 1 '**' V * * s*. '2^ •>, CITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND D PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address S*A ^ rlt/ k i j •i'*» t ‘'-i } I 4 CITY OF arm Ih u‘\ t>j______')i ffiV OFT ICE1S502V'M i.rr Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 2./ / / *723 Z3c)0 <To 'cmvrio:u03/15/90 Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. /eu/.y 0\^\y y Address X4<At./ u.^T>rJ /Pj Phone (home) V 5/ 0 _____ _Phone (work) ___________ City El/^hiy^ Zips.^ Ill OWNER^.lf different than applicant)Phone (home) '// - / Phone ^AddressAyy City j;tg^r.2^rz<^>«?ytczip -F //Date''pyoperty ‘7^cquiredr^]_2 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ (month/year) L-—I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-thc-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150 ♦ OO^est House/Guest Apartments _ $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _ $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling — designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of leUceshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS __ _ _ $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Appeals Other - see fee schedule IL ,J PRESENT OSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property X Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan^ if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR_ _ A WORKING COPY (ll" X 17' OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date___- - - - - - -- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ^ . The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administratorr agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this applicationp and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best op\ his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature ^ Date 7jJ]J_/ OUHRRS SI6HAT0RBThe owner hereby acJcnowledges and agrees to this application and further /.".“LiraSS* louTcfl^ purp^^T of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's y X_ _ Date , ^ 0 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are he f third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at al* j-.-.ieduied review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. CRcriO u'lisisao^ t •I !1 MAR 2 1 1990 .3- ^ / - 9o ^ ^ * * V- iX^>^ d3^ - y ^tco•o % ^ *x/ Sy^/y ;v / / ?li I of survey \ ^for hi char- H. hreusiedt in Lot 2^, rhoacur.v ;>wn T' / A Hennepin County, Kinncsota / Cortificute of Survey; /%' I hereby certifj' tnet tnis is a true end correct representation of a survey of the ocuacarie? ol tact part, of Lot 24, Pheasant Laur., lyinr Korth- uesterly of a line draun parallel with and 130 feet* Korthwc-sterly free, th-j Southesst- ei»\v line of said lot. t.ee location of all existing builcinfs thcrecn, and the shoreline as of March 9, 1977. Ko monuaer.ts have been alacec to establish lot co^.ers.esta^^sh lot ^ i‘-r»Tn^nn i. r.offin He! • o*^^4 Land Surve..or and Flcnncr Lonr .^ake, Minnesota Scale: 1" s 6C Date : 2>-^-T7 \J^' -i Ti . ■{ /< '4 y em HARDCOVER CALCULATIWIJilMSHEET SETBACK Z--NE: (CIRCLE ONE\^0-^ 75-250' Existing Hardcover in Zone 250-500' 5G0-1GC0' A. House t - LENGTH /\ Kac< - JrlT • ^ *^B. Garage . ^ / * V If‘ *=• Driveway : 512.5 • o\^!: ' V D.. Sidewalk C.j'SPO E. Patio/ Deck F,Landscape AREAS underlain BY , . plastic SHEETING G. Other X X X X X X X X X - X /7,4 width Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone 2 9Q.V ''^s.f.(D 1^0 J S.F. S.P. S.F. _ S.F. . S.F. . S.F. « # . S.F. . S.F. _ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. « S.F. S.F. S.F. - S.F S.F. [I x^oM ^|T| X100 - f*fl- -^ ^ ' ? /./O / HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET ^ SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' (^75-250^ 250-500' 500-1000' Existing H ardcover in Zone A. H ouse LENGTH 11 • XI.L B. Garage c. Driveway _JiC D. .-SrtfiHAtX-_21. <- 1 E.’at 10/ )ecx F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY .. . PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other A. WIDTH X Jj « ?r X X X X X X 2.J _ X__m X _ X _ 21 10 Total H ardcover in Zone s.F. ?9) ^9/ s.F.(?) 7vr 2 /o /dO fzxo .r . S.F. S.F. S.F. (£) S.F. Q) S.F^ S.F.(^ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S .f.6> s.F. S.F. « * 7 ^ - foTotal Property A rea in Zone - -------------------L£ r2ZQ _ •B 27.761. X 100 - -----% CJ : i Qiti. e-3 • I HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET_^^ ScT3ACK zone: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' ^75^25^ 250-5 Existing Hardcover ^nJone A. House , 'IX-.- -x —2i/- - -- - - s.f. ® B. Garage c. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/ Deck F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY plastic SHEETING 6. Other LENGTH X X .. X _ X _ X _ X WIDTH - X - - - , X _ _ _ X 21 Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone ^7^0 -fT S.F. _ S.F. S.F. S.F. S ^ I •f.'iiLji S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. _S.F. _ S.F. _ S.F. C2Z-0 s.F.<S)-<® ^7<)& S.F S.F 2n. S.F. B 273^2^ X 100 jV-f_■% % « • • •• ................. The Municipal Code of the City of Orono la amended by adding Ordinance No. 29, Second Series: Section 1. Orono Municipal Code Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (G) is hereby repealed and the following language substituted in its place: G. i) Guest Houses. A separate dwelling constructed on an existing undivided lot for the sole use of the occupants of the principal buildings, including their domestic employees or their non-paying guests. All regular lot requirements shall be met.by the guest house. ii) Non-rental Guest Apartments. An apartment within the principal residence structure on a lot for the sole use of the occupants of the principal residence, including their domestic employees or non-paying guests. There shall be at least one access door to the apartment -from within the principal structure, and such door shall be the primary access to the apartment. Application for such a guest apartment shall address the concerns of parking, sewage treatment, entryway and interior access method. Such apartments shall not have utilities metered separately from the principal residence utilities and shall not have a separate street address. I 1^^*i,4. i* .- '•_ * _ •• ..*•-' -i * 9 V.-.- j ■♦‘.K ;V ¥M ■> \ *v'‘5? ^'V' F ;v; ^ I ^ • i' m-,: i^L;5! - J--S JK i^:t«»' o » > V*'*- * *w :// p •vV.'TT; > ly' -<y /:v.^ - ’S ^ '‘'^'r; ‘ /•V'l / lli' - ■ .™_^ \ -/ ■•''. / ^ t» ft *■&' I ... /h r ro. Pits--[Jtfc E3> ,v r:'.; A r * ^ M/ - ‘’il:iv •« :.\\ :;is ' .',.^K;-' V . Xh'^U''-^ * '/ V.*, '/1r _ Vi 'arA .*- -i. f r «. Jt4 % tv> «> (. ^ r i M »/ ^ ; * ' • I-', o /f ‘ S ’ 5t> s. To: From: Date: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator April 12, 1990 Subject: #1511 City of Orono - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.22, Subdivision 3 (D) - Public service structures. The City proposes installation of a well, pump house, and 2 temporary pressure tanks within Out lot B of East Willow Woods plat (formerly Outlot A, Ringerswood currently under PUD review for Otten Brothers Nursery). The proposed improvement is required as part of the sewer and water improvement project for the Highway 12 area. A setback variance is required to that same section, as follows: A) Pumphouse to east lot line: Required = 50' Proposed « 43' Variance = 7' or 14% B) Pressure tanks have no required setback, setback standard in code applies to buildings only. The temporary pressure tanks will meet the required 50 + setback from all lot lines except the north lot line and will be located 34' from north lot line. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F - Cook's Letter - Outlot B - Property Owners List - Location Map - Access Drive Plan - Site Plan Review of Application - Future Outlot B shall house the municipal well, the 25'x27' pumphouse, and 2 temporary pressure tanks to be removed sometime within 10 years. The pressure tanks are needed to provide the necessary pressure for the fire suppression system for the Otten building and for the water needs of residential buildings within Sugar Woods. At the time the Orono water tower is installed somewhere along Highway 12, the pressure tanks will be removed. The pertinent code section requires 50' setback for all buildings. The permanent pumphouse structure will require a setback variance of 7' from the east lot line. Zoning File #1511 April 12, 1990 Page 2 of 2 Access to the site shall be temporarily provided via an existing driveway off Highway 12. Permanent access shall be P^O'^i^^ed via Outlet C or future east/west frontage road. As of this writing, staff has not received the elevations of the structure to determine visual impact upon the adjacent residential properties. These elevations will be presented at your meeting or included in the latter packets that go out on Friday afternoon. In any event, in your recommendation to approve, it would be appropriate to ask for evergreen type plantings along north and west lot line. The east lot line already has mature plantings. The Planning Commission may wish to include other conditions for the approval of this conditional use permit and variance application for the City of Orono. I '» I /^/i 1 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Ooo G 9one«^ P£ ttooen W P£ Jovetjn C Anden»*L P£ E rumrr P£ Jjnm C Oton PE Gienn R Coofc P£ Thonvjt E %ovrv PE Room G kOuTKOt PE Mjrvm L Sorvau PE rmh A Gofdon P£ RicnM] \Ji/ Fotfef. PE OororfJ C BufgjnX. PE j^rry A BotPOon PE Uark A Hanson PE :ea«. pe Mcnjd r Pjutfnjnn P£ Room R PtfttffTf PE D^vnJ O LoiMOU. PE Toonruj W l^tenon. PE M<n*c< C Lyncn. PE Jjnei R UMnd PE P .A/x3econ PE Uvk R RoRi PE Room C Vuuek. AiA r^xxnai £ Angui, PB Hopwaia A SmftxdL PE DjTfcei j Ejgmor. PE U»k A Sra PE PrvK> j CjsvneA P£ Mjrk O NAM PE Tnorrvu R Aodmoa AJA Gjry f Ryunder. PE Miet a Jenim. PE L P^«»o Ojwci ■. PE Crvines A Enuion Leo M PjwenAy Kvuo M Otson Suvn M Efcerta C-PA Engineers A Architects March 15, 1990 City of Ocono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 #1511 { Attn: Jeanne Mabusth Re: Otten Subdivision File No. 139A9 Dear Jeanne: Enclosed please find a copy of Outlot B on the Otten property where the now well & pumphouse will be constructed. The proposed location of the pumphouse will require a variance for a A5' setback from the east line for the permanent structure. It will also be necessary to obtain a variance for a 40' setback from the east line and a 30' setback from the north line for the pressure tank. The pressure tank will extend outside the building and will remain in place for 10 years or less. We should start the process with the Planning Commission for obtaining the appropriate variances on the pump house. If you have any questions please contact this office. Yours very truly. BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:dh cc: John Gerhardson GRC/I6 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul. Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 Property Owners List for the City of Orono, application #1511 34-118-23 21 0020/21/22 Sidney Rebers 3525 Webster Ave Minneapolis, MN 55416 34-118-23 21 0002 William Wear P.O. Box 306 Long Lake, MN 55356 34-118-23 22 0013 Clifford Otten Box 249 Long Lake, MN 55356 34-118-23 22 0003 Stoddard & Robyr Lawrence 720 Dickey Lake Drive Long Lake, MN 55356 34-118-23 22 0012 Clifford Otten Box 249 Long Lake, MN 55356 34-118-23 22 0013 Clifford Otten P.O. Box 249 Lona Lake, MN 55356 IL J V/ * From: Date: Subiect: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator April 12, 1990 #1512 Steven Ruce, 4625 West Branch Road - After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing n. Zoning District - RR-IB Required Area « 2 acres Existing ■ 54,108 s.f. or 1.24 acres Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 - Conditional use permit required for land alterations in excess of 100 cubic yards and the installation of an extensive network of retaining walls ranging in height from 3' to 5'6". Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 - Non-encroachment, if retaining wall no higher than 3 1/2* in defined. Section 10.08, Subdivision 5 (B) - Front yard setback variance for retaining walls in excess of 3 1/2'. Required Setback * 50' Proposed ■ 8' Variance » 42' Allowed Height ■ 3 1/2' Proposed ■ 4'4" Compare Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (L) - Conditional use permit for crop use and Section 10.20, Subdivision 4 — Gardens, etc. as accessory uses. Determine level of use and classification of gardens installed by applicant. Plantings from gardens are to be used in landscape business for off site plantings. If use is classified as a conditional use, 10 acres of area is required. The property consists of 1.24 acres. Section 10.28, Subdivision 4 (A) - Home occupation. Permitted accessory use as long as that use does not violate the standards of the home occupation standards. License is now required for home occupation. Applicant should be advised to make application. Zoning File #1512 April 12, 1990 Page 2 of 5 List of Exhibits - Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Application Property Owners List Plat Map Septic Inventory Map Survey Plan of Terraced Garden Topographic Detail Green House Site Plan Elevation of Green House Addition Council Minutes of 2/25/85 Resolution #1712 Review of Application - In a routine building inspection for the new accessory garage structure on the property, the building Ind reported on the extensive terracing done and east yard of the property. The zoning staff contacted M . Ruce to advise of the need for a conditional use permit. In add!tionr applicant advised that the plantings within the teriaced are^a were to be used for his landscape customers. Sections of the retaining wall exceed the allowed height the 50* yard setback area requiring height and setback variance for retaining walls. Please compare Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (L) 10 20 Subdivision 4. This is clear ^ not a typical Ian alteration conditional use emp'o minim or provide gentler sloped areas for -uciiiional applicant is in the business of creating yards with beautiful Gardens Photo reports of Mr. Ruce's gardens have !“lri'nd national landscape magazines. The provide protected/controlled growth areas for young plantings be used in the gardens of applicant's clients. g|-y determine if a conditional use permit is needed for f ® because of the commercial aspect of the use, or is this garden a typical accessory use because of the design and appearance of the terraced gardens? In 1985, the applicant received approval JJsidence. Pleale review Exhibits J J discuss tihe natur© and d©gr©e of coininercial the commercial use was proposed at such a minimal level. Resolution #1712 established conditions for the control of the conunercial use as follows: Zoning File #1512 April 12, 1990 Page 3 of 5 1. There was to be no retail sales activities on the property, this continues to be followed by the applicant. 2. All outside storage of materials or equipment must be fenced in such a manner so as to screen the stored material from view when observed from the public street or adjoining lot. Applicant has just recently constructed a second accessory structure to house additional equipment and truck. Any equipment stored in the outer yard is stored to the south and back of the residence and garage structures within the lower sloped areas not visible from the street or adjoining lot. The City has never received a complaint concerning the operation of the landscape business. 3. As a homa occupation, the applicant was to ensure that the entrance to the greenhouse was to be gained from within the house. This still appears to be the case for the 10'x25' greenhouse attached to the south side of the existing residence structure. A) The greenhouse addition to the detached garage is entranced from the outside and would appear to have never received approval in the original conditional use permit (please review Exhibits H and I). There is also no record in the address file of a building permit being issued for the greenhouse addition. Applicant should be asked to respond as to the use of this area. B) No sign to be permitted other than those normally allowed in residential districts. Applicant has complied with this condition. There is no signage that announces a landscape operation. C) No t'mployees allowed to work on the site. At the time ! iff made an inspection of the property on Wednesday, April 11th at approximately 2:00 p.m., there were 3 trucks parked in the driveway and there appeared to be no one on the property, at least no one was within the existing residence. Applicant must be advised that if there are employees involved with the business, that they are to maintain their trucks off site and cannot be parked on the residential property. The landscape operators who run operations from their home cannot store commercial vehicles on their property nor can employees meet on the site to conduct business. Zoning File #1512 April 12, 1990 Page 4 of 5 7i legal home occupation cannot have employees on residential site. In fact, the only visible signs of a commercial operation were the 3 trucks parked in the driveway and the unique terraced gardens within the east yard. It should also be noted that at the time the 1985 conditional use permit was issued, a home occupation was a permitted accessory use requiring no license review. It may be appropriate for the applicant to apply for a home occupation license. Issues for Consideration ~ Is the terraced garden area acceptable in its present configuration? Is the sale of the plantings from those gardens objectionable? - Has it increased the commercial use of the property to an unacceptable level? Does this garden function as a seasonal greenhouse requiring approval of an expansion of the original conditional use permit for greenhouse use? Based on applicant's response to greenhouse addition to rear of detached garage, how does the greenhouse addition affect the original conditional use permit for greenhouse use? Has the intensification of landscape use of the residential property affected the original approved home occupation? Options of Action - A. Conditional use permit and variance (setback/height of retaining walls in front yard) for land alterations involving installation of retaining walls: 1. Denial, requiring removal - recommendation date for complete restoration to original state. 2. Conditional approval - allow retaining walls to remain but all walls in excess of 3 1/2' in height to be reduced or remove portions of terraced gardens to lessen commercial lock/use. 3. Approval as submitted. B. Conditional use permit for nursery/crop use and variance to required 10 acre in area standard: 1. Denial - all sale of plantings to cease. In the future such gardens to be defined and used as a permitted accessory use. Zoning File #1512 April 12, 1990 Page 5 of 5 2. Approval as proposed subject to conditions set forth in resolution #1712 and any other conditions deemed appropriate by the Planning^Commission,^i.e. no further landscaping expansion on this limited site - to include greenhouse expansions also. C.Based on greenhouse addition to rear of detached garage: 1. Denial - require removal or change in use of that portion of detached garage and require applicant to obtain penalty building permit for addition. 2. Approval of conditional use permit for expansion of greenhouse use and require applicant to obtain penalty building permit for addition. D.Home occupation - applicant to be advised to file for a home occupation license and of need to maintain standards for the operation of that home occupation. w 1 l=VsJ m&ms , oEx r iw.ss____ ^-.-rrsT—ruAWJl- Site Address ^^5 iNfcST Bti^MrH RcAD- M^I.'MD, MK 55M_ Property Identification Number (.9.1.0.) 07-1-t'^^'^^^QO*^ CITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION .. 01 {p/ V ‘"'Si.'nf r-^stv,v‘yffl. «725d ax>! .wyjjj Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name v"^TEaV£M d . Phone Thorne) ^7Z~(o(^T6_ Phone fwork) ■^‘7^ ^(p73 Address 4(ii25 \Mnsr^&yMa4 R^ao__— 7.ip_2^h± ^iS^'ardiffirint’tharappilointr Phone (home) 4'7-3~^7Pi------- Name TA^AI A. / 'J(^p P' KuC6- Address X^950 ^AM£/ Date Property Acquired X»92^ Phone ___________ _ City ViA^p/fYA^Zip. (month/year) I*(do) (Bo no^) also own the adjacent _ _ _ _ PEES - CONDITIONAL DSE PERMITS - After-the-^act^pL^-^Double^Current Application Fee $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $150.00 Institutional (churchy school# etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading# seawall# retaining walls within 75 of laxesnore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS^ Commercial Site Plan Review (t consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation , a . - - - - $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision - - - - $250.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $100.00 Appeals ~ other “ see fee schedule ! t PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District k pAmily Present Use of Property _ _ _ _ ✓ Residential Other (specif y ) Ccod>tu.n<\l ItSt. DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail : CQN5TKUcro»^ OF A TWAC6P FOR UiE l>i G<^0WINC PtfigMNIAL RjlWgJU Pf R.-R COftiA/igtCtAL < uC VAl^ni^ ,^L£<; Ap-Lvriy r^ro iHfe ekopB^rf ________________________________ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). UTM , Af)/WSmA(nQK 3. Plat Map. ' 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11* X 17 ” OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the Information supplied is true and correct to the, best of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of Date investigation and verification of this^request. Owner's signature _'_ _ _ Applicant must ha^^/'^I^^ submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. TO: PROM: DATE: SUBJECT: C'^unci 1 P. Gnffron r.oninq AHmi n i fit rat cr November 15» 1984 1880 Steven Ruce, 4625 West Pranch Road - Conditional Use Permit ^ Zoning District - RR-lB - 2 acre unsoweted Application - Conditional Use Pf^rmit for a commercial greenho**«e attached to existing dwelling. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit D - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Site Plan • Exhibit E - Typical Construction Plan Exhibit F - Copy of Planning Commission Action Notice Exhibit G - Code Sections Pertinent (Commercial Use) V * ^ r The applicant wishes to construct a 10* x 25 * greenhouse attached to the existing dwelling. Thr* use would be somewhat conunercial in that applicant plans to sell some plants to others at off-site locations. The planned structure and use would have no effect on the septic systemr would not appear to create additional traffic or cause any neighborhood hazards# and meets all setback requirements. Note that this is a one acre lot in a two acre zone. Planning Commission at their November 19# 1984 r meeting found that no retail sales activity was proposed to take place.on the property^ and recommended approval subject to the structure conforming to all pertinent building code requirements. Planning Commission also questioned whether the proposed use is i ntense enough to even require a conditional use permit# and recommended that staff review the possibi lity of refunding the conditional use permit application fee. This was brought in as an application for a commercial greenhouse cond i t ion a 1 use permi t por Section 10.20# Subd 3(E). It may instead fall under the ’’home occupation" standards (13.20 Subd 4(c) J as an accessory us^. A resolution of approval for the conditional use permit is attached. ■ .♦‘I « ! u v‘ -V.•/ ' t > ‘.•i •>71 ■ -n] * *>17*1x\ 1 1 •f :^T\**• i •- € *\l HI U7.' mUMf, ■. S guvt> :.>vf.».. f ' ,. City of ORONO ICITY OF . ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. I'l^- liqht# oir nor por.»* n fire hr*zArcl cr other danger o ncighborinq properties, nor will it property values and that the proposed property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives o the Zoning Co<ie and Compr«'hen!.ivo Plan of the City. Conclusions, Order and Conditions Based upon the above findings, the Oro^o ^ity Counci3 hereby grants a Conditional Use Fernut per foi «™“Vci,l ."bjcct to the tol-.ovin, condlt.or,. No retail sales ictivity may take place on the property All outside storage of materials or equipment must be fenced in such a manner so as to screen the stored material from vie when observed from the public street or adjoining lot. AS a home occupation, the following performance standards further c:pply: a) Entrance to the .irecnhousc must be gained from within the house. b) No siqn permitted Other than those normally allowed in res 1 den 11 »"i 1 districts. c) No en^ployees allowed to work *on the site The structure must conform to all pertinent Building Code rrqui rerrent s. P.iqc' 2 of 4 I • 4 .. i .W 1 CITY OF ORONO 4960192 City of ORONO resolution 0FTH£CIT> council NO. ' HumJiJrsiss «o. ..o UIIEBt^A!., stov. n ''■■•:•■ ^ loc.itod within °;r^.tv Vro^orU'ctSt -t:-ctty-. »na dn4cr.be.. e» The ....rth ri'» ..hd - ^,/Vo£ VeeUoh'l! "proper ty” ) ? MIIBRRAS. the •■'Pp.ieeht *”,^Qj*^an^attechcd 10' x 20* .irpS:.'e; 'r.'.- .c„i = .p... lohU, cede section 10.20, ? u i V i r. i on - ( E) . NOW. TllF.BF.rOFF.. BF. IT RF..‘iOl.VKD by thn Ci ty Covnci 1 of Orono. Ml nri''rot.i: Flmli nqr. ,. T,.. »iv..c............... r..e..w... .... ten.hcPi.ehh. . Th. tn .hf »•-"> ””• • i.-rnl.-nt I.V. •.•.cninn n.r.trirr. Oil I". “"nthc proporty. th.it no nm the property would be created. ocldition.ll tr.iffic effect on the septic system, .ir.d the propos.il the structure conform to all t’rn.^nr s^t 11°;“ oV t-h^^u’i l‘din. Code. , .,j,p City Council h.ir. considered Commission. ’• he nndinus .ind --ommendationn o^^ ^ff ^ VI,.:".'-'^Xe^M'.h.^'..^e^y .nd wcii.rc »< th. community. ^ raqc 1 of 4 ndNSF^R ENTERED w «*k n )AN 17 1385 Ii ' V • f . • •r. • 'i; 1 HiKUTi::; or nii: io;(;ih.ak oiuiwt a)UKi:ii. Ki:i:Ti?;t; iii:i.n ^•l•lm^lAliY I’AOi: 5 • Pnn .:Ti\,rN HUCK CounciIn.cmbcr I.. Adons agreed with Puce and the * ' ' Commirsion in regards to the low level of commercial use for the property. Adams stated that Ruce could have come into the City hall and asked for a building permit and received a building permit without getting a conditional use, but he w;s honest and mentioned 0 low level of coijr.icrci.T 1 use fe: the property. 7cnir.c Adn.inistrator .'labusth noted that the,-^toning code doesn't address the "decree*' of-cdirme'rclality^Mabusth c.rplaincd that to be nrVr.r. for a rcfurd?6rthe fee ..s r-'.thcr aftcr-th<“-facr. Ccur.cilrcr..! Cl Grahek reved. Ccunci Imenl'er L. Adams seconded, to refund the $100 conditional use application fee to Steven Ruce but still have the conditional use on file and filed in the chain of title in order to protect the City acainst further commerciality on the property based on the lev level of commercial use intended for the pjcpcrty. Koticn, Ayes (j), N’ays (0). 1886 RICHARD RAGATZ 1945 CONCORDIA STREKT VARIANCE RESOLUTION 11730* • ■■y • §l •v3l - rf-w ■•.t* ♦ « *f. Acting Mayer Frahr. roved, CounciIr.enber L. Adams seconded, tc adopt resolution 11730, A Resolution Granting a Variance to permit construction of a 770 at . dec?: structure of w!iich 4C< sf is to be located within• the C-7S* setback rone. Motir ^ves (3)» Nays (0). ’A* 4 >1 PLANNING FOR MAINTENANCE _. OF MUNICIPAL CODE Zcnir.c Administrate! Mabusth ^ contract with the Municipal Ordinance Codifiers# inc. for one year who would provide for the first annual revision and update of the municipal code. Mabusth ^ stated that the other option is to buy the discs and have the City's cwn clerical staff update the code. Mabusth noted that the Municipal Codifiers would be abla to incorporate the State Statutes into the code whereas the City clerical staff would not be able to without a Great deal of time spent on the project. Mabusth notcd'that tl.c City .ilrea.',. nas adopted 10 ordinances since the recodificatio,'. of the code. CounciImcmbcr Grabek asked if the Codifiers could give the City an evaluation throughout the year to get some idea of the cost of such a servi-o. Police Chief Kilbo noted that the three of those ten c.dinanccs were the ones th» first place. Kilbo noted those flFJt three ordin.inces that were left . •• free ones from the Codifiers. V'i .•i 1 I'] v.iiiUTi;:-. or tim: iot.ui .m. oiuiku luut.rii. kutini ; iii:m» ithiuiakv /•,. J'JH'j.1‘Ar.i: 5 isno STKVKN uuci:Coimci In.cnibcr 1.. Ador f uqi cccl wiUi Pucc anJ the Planning Commirsioii in regard:: to the low level of coaimercial use fer the property. Adams stated that Rucc could navc^ come into the City hall and asked for a building permit and received a building permit without getting a conditional use. but he wr.s honest and mentioned a low level of conncrcial use f?j the property. r.cninc Adn.inistrator Mabusth noted that the ;,*cming code doesn’t address the "dcnrcc* or-cdn-rrerclalityt^^husth explained that to be arJtrd for a rcfurd:^or the fee is r.-.thcr aftcr-th<--facr . Cc jr.cilr.cr.i ci GrabeV. reved. Ccunci Ircn-.ber L. Adams seconded, to refund the JlOO conditional use application fee to Steven Rucc but still have the conditional use on file and filed in the chain of title in order to protect the City acainst further commerciality on the property based on the lev level of ccmmercial use intended for the pseperty. r.ot;cn, Ayes (3)« hays (G). ••e. *886 RICHARD RAGATZ 1945 CONCORDIA STREET VARIANCE RESOLUTION 11730*Acting Mayer Fr.ahr. roved, CounciIr.ertber L. Adams seconded, to adept resolution *1730, A Resolution Granting a Variance tc permit construction of a 770 sf deck structure of wliich sC< sf is to be located within the C-7S* setback r.cnc. Motion# Ayes (3)» Ways (O). \ PLANNING FOR MAINTENANCE . OF MUNICIPAL CODE Zcnir.c Ad.-.i ni st rate: . j5j.T- ^contract with the Municipal Ordinance Codifiers, i.—. for one year who would provide for the first annual revision and update of the municipal code. Mabustn stated that the other option is to buy the discs and have the City’s cwn clerical staff update the code. Mabusth noted that the Municipal Codifiers to incorporate the State Statutes into the code whereas the City clerical staff to without a Great deal of time spent on the Project. Mabusth noted that ti.e City already has adopted 10 ordinances si.ncc the rccodification of the code. CounciImcmbcr Crabek asked if the Codifiers could give the City an cv.aluation throughout the year to get some idea of the cost of such a service. Police Chief Kilbo noted that the three of those ten c^inanccs were the ones the Codifiers left out in the first oliscc. Kilbo noted that those first three ordinances th.at were left out should bo free ones from tl:c Codifiers. •CJ “5! ' t. v.iNirn::; <'r rm. i{i:t;iu.,M. cm-i..! t (mii.ci i. mi i.tikc iii:m. rrniav.i.-v IR5 3 DCu: !./>:: KI.IKT TOM nno'lKK * GARY llAKK 3535/3 5'i'i IVY PT^CK & 303< CA; *0 POINT HD SUBJIVi: ;oN There was no one prerent to represent the applicants Zoninq Acnunistrator Mahusth noted that this^application IS .1 resnlt of the vacation of Maple Avenue. Counc) Irrr l'ci I.. A^.v-.s moved. Acting Mayor .Frahm . .tciiecd, to aipsove the plat cf a lot line^ reariv.necn.ent kneu.-, ar Casco Cove finding all lots meet exLtirc'^'^f ^ '"■ zoning distrlct/and that all distrie^ Structures meet .the iseguired netback* for the ^ Aipioval subject to'^hc condition that that^noM"^ reflect the City's ownership of nlit le i-arc referred to on the preliminary PayJ (S). dedicated as road". Motion. Ayes (3). »872 BRKCKENRIDCn DEVELOPMENT CORP 1200 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD PINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTIcv: 11729* Acting Mayer Frahr. nevod. Counci Imtmber L. Adams seconeoc, tc acept Kcrolution 11729, A Resolution Sr’co)? Koticn, Ayes (3), >880 STKVKN RUCE 4625 WEST •’lANCII ROAD CONDITIONAJ. USE PER.M1T REQUEST FOR REFUND OF AfPtlCATlo,. PRB 2o„ir, ' A ... .,t.i..e(. tha^ at the last Council meeting, Steven Rucc .-ipplicaticn was placed cn Consent Agenda* and was •ippicvcc. but the request for the refund of’the .••ppl icaticn fee v.'.r- never addressed. application has such ami.iimal co.-nmercial use with no retail sales activity on the property, he asked Council for a refund of the ccni.ition.il use permit fee of $100. Ruce noted that tn*.-. v.ir. also the Pl.inning Commission's recommendation. Acting Mayer Frahm noted that the conditional use permit is protection for the City in order for the City to control the level of commercial use on t.he property. ^.Thm noted that a 10 x 25* greenhouse could very easily ^comc .1 more intense commercial greenhouse with a ^ luturc owner. City Attorney R.idio stated that the fee is to pay for application and also for the filing of the resolution in the chain of title. •> f: 5t) title: perspective view OF SUN VALLEY CEBU SHOWING PARTS ASSEMBLY date:scale: not to scale rev :dwn : 8G. V-7L V-VENT SASH ASSEMBLY' NOTE: MODEL ILLUSTRATED IS JANCO standard lO'-ll 3/3" FOUNDATION LENGTH j^-lA ir'-CAvc I H- tbCAM? £^. D- 1 K\ 1 CQ 1 C2 1 1 i\ 1 SOCKET FOR P-2 PIPE BRACE PIPE FOR P a BRACE H~rA r===l PART 3-J DOOR filler y '"CUT OUT C-3 AS SHOWN TO FORM DOORWAY 8" WALL X 2 ’-5" HIGH ^ ■. I.* I ,‘C. i *. *« : * H- I«r H ] ’i I ‘I: i(r •: . ?0' f^fi.CiPOSKC i3U.vv/:o><"^.^v" l.:x a. :-^jj (/.z '♦ -j /7 — ^ .A ^ To?Planning Conunission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Prom;Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:April 12, 1990 Subject: #1513 Walter Krahl, 4775 North Shore Drive - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IB, Single ramily lakeshore residential, 1 acre sewered Application - Request for hardcover and street setback variances to construct addition to existing residence. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D “ Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey with Existing Site Development Including Topography Existing and Proposed Site Plans Plan and Elevation Views of Proposed Addition Applicant's Hardcover Submittal Staff's Hardcover Review Pertinent Pacts - 1.Applicant proposes to construct an addition to his existing residence, which is located on a terrace level above a steep slope down to the lake. 2.All of the proposed construction is in the 75-250' setback zone. 3.The adjacent property to the west is owned by Orono for lake access lanes, and there is no intent to place a residence on that property. The nearest adDacent residence to the west in Minnetrista, appears from City ai photos to be approximately 70' from the shoreline. From those air photos, staff has determined that the proposed additions will not encroach past the average lakeshore set back line. 4.The applicant's property originally extended further northward, but the platting of North Shore Drive resulted in loss of some property. 5.The existing house is approximately 22' from the street lot line, and the proposed addition at its closest point will be approximately 23' from the street lot line. This requires a 12* variance from the 35' required street setback in the LR- IB district. Zoning File #1513 April 12, 1990 Page 2 of 3 6. This property is served by a driveway shared with the adjacent residence at 4755 North Shore Drive. While the driveway fraction of the hardcover will significantly decrease within applicant's property as a result of the addition, there appears to be adequate backup area available within the neighboring property to handle traffic from this residence. As an aside, note that while driveway area serving the applicant may tend to increase hardcover on the neighbors’ property above that which would normally be necessary, the overall result is a relatively safe access with adequate parking area and probably less total hardcover than if each residence had its own access to the County Road. 7. Staff has reviewed the hardcover on the property and found substantially more rock and plastic hardcover than noted by applicant's surveyor. By staff calculation, existing 75—250' hardcover is 54.8%, and the proposed layout results in a reduction to 51.0%. In the 0-75' zone, existing and proposed hardcover amounts to approximately 325 s.f. or 3.6%, consisting of stairway sections and a retaining wall. There appears to be substantial rock and plastic hardcover accounted for in staff's calculations that could be further removed without starting tc limit the extent of the additions. Discussion - The proposed additions appear to mostly conform to pre existing grades on the property. The house sits on a relatively flat terrace below the County Road, but in the 0-75' zone where no work is proposed, slopes average 65%, and obviously the existing stairways are needed for this 1st to have reasonable access to the lakeshore. The extensive retaining walls southwest of tho house are mostly on the City property. Those slopes are also somewhat limiting in that additions to the existing house generally have to run to the east and west rather than lakeward to keep back from the slope. This lot is relatively small overall for this zoning district, being 0.45 acre in the 1 acre zone. The proposed master bedroom addition at the west end of the house will be approximately 11.5 ’ from the west lot line, meeting the required 10' setback. zoning File #1513 April 12, 1990 Page 3 of 3 Staff Recommendation - If Planning Commission finds that the proposed net overall hardcover reduction is appropriate/ and finds that the portion of the proposed addition encroaching into the street setback is no more obtrusive than the existing residence encroachment and finds that this lot will not be "overbuilt" with the added structure/ then a recommendation for approval of these variances could be considered. Summary of Variance Request - 1. Street setback of 23' where 35' is required. 2. Hardcover in excess of 25% in 75-250’ zone/ reduction from 54.8% to 51.0% is proposed. What additional reduction/ if any/ should be required? /■^|3 J -f **» CITY OP OROIIO - VARIANCE APPLICATiq«^ Initial Application Fee $175.00 f$50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) ^f^er-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ^ i If pj»Qp0j^ty Identxfxcation Number (P.I.D.) ,.'.1 ^ 7 "’^CITY OF O.W office 175.^ ‘■''fcEffr-rfsas'if in 72320 COO! I<01J.12 • A » • '% J ^ w O y X Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT f Name ry/ t V ^ -> ^^4 - 7")Address t 77^ j-J Phone (home) v •_ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (worlc) City; P).-/'/ n Zip I ■ ■F'-f'? VcOl OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name >'}F •f -/C.4^y'Phone (worlc) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired - V (month/year) I (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT DSB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property s7^<3cj LRi3 Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $—-2C.d. Describe request in 5-/^W£..r~^ - - VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width y ^rKcx^ Setback Variances ( ^ Front Hardcover Side _ _ _ Rear) Other HARDSHIP Describe enforcement Tf / ' undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting'from strict nt of zoning regulations: S\-r",'nr r r C.::cio._ DESCRIPTION OP DNDSDAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: ■■ « :i~~ — Lz/r.. V* > ,Ons •*fT*rjr REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. As an addendum to this application^ please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. •>• 3. 4. 5. 6. /. YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPI.’S OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR , A WORKING COPY (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not bcien included. Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. .-1 Date C^i ■ '2^0pplicant's Signature v O' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. . ' ! - // ^ ^ ^ Owner's Signature \ y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date C -i //ii / rC Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. L-uui—1 o K ^ Kl M a ^ -li»C»i'' «^, . • S, ■*’ J 8CLUJQC <51 O'aoo MK1 K» CM X Xu uX < <° s sui ui ui X§ o ^ U| ^ </) X X X x»:?issH (/) in rlg'^'^x ooo O'oo Xu►- a •jI > t 'SK1 O 0 1 o0 CM K> PO CM 1 f^ rH I h* O M Mno COo CM &N> »#•Mlvnui oX CO < M X O O eo o 1-4 M O X oO X XO X U. UJ U. M M X 2dS* Ui «t O UJ ^ o o 8X H < m M X m 2 o M zMOM X M X o «( o z<X X Z a, o X a X a Ui < > N.< ^ X M n CM O Urf CM M M X CM I X S3M A. M Ir'. o in O' h. CO \r M O M a X ^ UI Q ii «J u. OUIM > < M M M to u V# t CM in €0>o M O Ui UJo COto UiUu«( orx \c^ M N>0 MhR 23 ' 90 08:25 CITIZD'-Ei'LILL .:0. itA/Oft 1^/11//lAicr ^rrA>: m,Ke- P.1.2 ..<£.7r£‘/i dM—/^/*m/JVarj l^ur/ S'JR^/^/oA.I QURfieVr ./IfttA Jtr/odD . Tj^'^rrd/fcr /^d /^^ocO • -Ang4 ca(/jcfr0 g / -^uUfTjtcrS z: ^ of A^rJcovtr aj/cu/d’/rco ' ifur /oo- 39 0^^ /^A0P0S£D /iifJiD Cau^y? fo of f/arJi^cu^r c.s/co/aP/c/t: AA = at Xf% y /oY.S' ^aa/rvt*/s----- /4 - / 'X = B - y' < A/r ^ c - /r% z^- Z>- {9'x //'a <3yai /9'f3l/j-A a9v-s' /9'Af'-A 7(f & - If' K /j? //- i't. /V - 3- 99/ (/■/)'■ Og/d . /fagJiCOy/a/^ Si y/J7 9?!*' fiAofosao Rfoucrngy =" 7jy.s' (ff)'~ Og‘iar/0Afs IZT- <Ri vj/^' Sfkgc flfCAf Jt0aZgiJ4^ ¥' Kf' •* JJ< PAf/6 <Rd'z(Jg' Bogr Par /b'x/^* SRiifiruJAY /^'k /// ' - /Vf.J' - /o - /66 '*■ ^ //<py, (fg)'- A/zfr RfoocnaA: /J/. ^ 3^ 99 J. s' » PXoPoS^d ZiPAPDCOt/aP 4 r»- —•. .. .-wi'ri’C—- . . FAX: 612*890-6236mm h .v; I . « Minnesota V alley Surveyors Inc MAIN OFFICE ^10 6 117th ST. P.O. BOX 1169 BURNSVILLE. MN 55337 612-690-7750 NOBTH OFFICE 6501 E. RIVER RD.. SUITE 202 FRIDLEY. MN 55432 812-571-0280 Septwnbar 22, i1969 Wally Krahl 4775 North Shora Drive Mound, Minnesota 55364 »- Dear Wally, U,t«l b.low ar. th. that you wUl naad. »l.o ancloaad ia a print with the Hard s«ir£are shaded in. 1. Area above 100 yard flood plane-16,630 square feeta 2. Area of building setback fron lake-10,565 square feet. 3. Area of property covered by hard surfaces-4,127 square feet. Sorry for the Delay. Sincerely, todd 6. Christenson TGC:Iv Enc: I * •* -^t*- «. f / \ \ \ \ " ^ If *'*C• •• I •. - / ; ■<••./ ; • • •• -•••. .Mje.i7£'«9E S 'rfi ”// i/v ^111 \s ! 62*921 ^icn dolA Js3/n 3MX jo Isvi ' \ \ , 1/1X I'' • ■ • I '' \V ' ZiX,// M \ O'99 I ^ I U I ki \' u' ••••^ ' • • / 7 7 11 M 11 ✓ / ,■//; ' '///V III / ///III HI / / /A / ///;;/; / 7 %■ ' u. t i y / / / ! / / / ' I / / i.l » L <L O Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administr*tor Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator April 11, 1990 #1514 Ronald E. Miller. 270 North Willow Drive - Variance • Public Hearing zoning District - RR-IB, single family rural residential, 2 acre Application - Bequest for »eight variance for accessory barn Structure to be moved onto the site. Fro"i; Date: Subject: List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - Application Letter of Request Plat Map Survey%ite Plan with Proposed Bap Building Building Plan view and Cross Section slaff^Letter to Applicant dated 3/12/90 AppUcan^-fLette? to Adjacent Property Owners S Acknowledgement Forms Photos of Barn In Situ at Panuska Propertyr Showing Relation of Heights with Family Members 2. Pertinent Facts - 1. The applicant owns acre parcel (exc^ the 50- |?S?:rin,*\o ro"vV a"b«n o^o his proferty from the Indian Creek plat on Watertown Road. This barn will end up being approximately ‘n pea^ grade. The barn is proposed to t*he^ right-of-w nl!‘%r.o'’bL%\ ^°p“proxi“mate ly rnrhorr.’'%n°d“\he“extensive list of equipment per applicant's letter of request. 4. Note that the barn structure |°”®^g®^®e<,en\ly adopted oversized accessory 1^400 square foot oversizedordinance, being less than the 1,400 sc^are *a“e°^loVy"s^trl-c°t^r^;^cove”an^ would have to be executed by the applicant. 3. 1^4 Zoning Pile #1514 April 11. 1990 Page 3 of 3 1. Will any fill have to be brought onto the property in order to create the walkout barn, or will the basement excavation yield adeguate amounts of fill? 2. Will the barn result in a need for an additional curb cut onto the existing road? 1 ■*/ CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per e>ich additional variance) Renewal Vari-’*nce Fee $100.00 (no char.%'t» from original application) After-tlva-F.*' ' ^ees (Double application fee) #151 L rrry nr iir.nunt/A t I VI VISV^IU TTA/Au-r nrrrrc,U VI t AVL, ir^sr /lA PROPERTY 1.OCATI0N sit. Address 7 LO-HotO QptoC <:®' t i?S:55 ifimrd-ccormh-^ Property Identification Number (P.I.O.) 3i*^ 34- Attach legal description to application if not included on required svrvey. APPLICANT Phone (home) H73' Name O^ilir (7 Phone (work) Address; V7D Kn,l,O.Ui:io pQtoc City; Lb/Cj OWNER (if different than applicant) Name *^0. rv\ 'f_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City;Zip; Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) vdo no^also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT OSE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost Describe request in detail; fcg Qccc-i^c/?x| _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Lt.Tr«<7_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances ( Other Mcicj^T q<:c«. si» Front Side Rear) HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resultinq from stric- enforcement of zoning regulations; c.Lrir<<? _ _ _ _ _ _ _“ DESCRIPTION OP DNUSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS preventing conipliance with Zoning REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain 348-3271? Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 3, Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate ol survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include ^ -h^rdcover^ calculations as required. -?2E£2£2Pij^ survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes rn existing grade are proposed. r.W c* 6* Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may b,e requested by City staff. ' L I 1/• tv To a.()'^c\Cd.wA Ovjw <<• <1^ \ lAAO . YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SDPPLY30COPIBS OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR _ _^ WORKING COPY (ll* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not, been includ^. " Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff:_ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied IS true and correct to the best of his/her Jcnowledge. Applicant's Signature 1 f Date llVwL 7(1 Qr, OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ac)cowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agentSf Commission members^ and Council members for purposes of Investiga tion and verlfIcati^iT^f this request. Owner's Signature 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date U ZC Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is ® attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zonina Orrlce of this change prior to the meeting. March 21, 1990 City of Orono mMJ 1335 South Brown Road ^ P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Regarding Variance 270 N. Willow Drive In planning for a barn, we were limited to 1400 sq. ft., to try and store equipment large and small and have a spot for possible future animals. We came across a barn that fit the bill. It is a 27*X44* - 10ft side walled with an 8'2" high gambrel roof, which could be used as a loft area. The barn measures 19*6" from grade to the peak of the roof. According to the ordance we can't build an accessory building over the height of the principal dwelling, which is 15'6" above grade. (We have a walk out rambler which gives you the least eunount of gradeto peak height.) We would like a variance to end up with a 19'6" grade to peak, to take care of our storage needs. Height and storage area breakdown; Below grade- 7' basement animal area Above grade- 1' floor joists 10' sidewalls to machine area ( to accomodate height of equipment) 1. Ford 3000 tractor 5' rototiller rotary mower gil pulverizer back blade sickle mower hydrolic loader 2. Case tractor 8' disk plow hay rake 3. log splitter 4. 2 utility trailers 5. 1926 Chev. roadster 6. 2 walk behind rototillers 7. winter storage for boat 8. summer storage for 3 snowmobiles 9. riding lawn mower 10. wheelbarrows and garden carta 5' 5' 6' 7' L. I 9 i■jii/ -2- March 21, 1990 # 8 I'i) -*f • dLa|ga 8'6" Gambrel - loft area feed and small equipment storage 1. beekeeping equipment for 10 colonies 2. evaporator and other misc. maple syrup equipment 3. Strawberry and raspberry crates 4. misc. antiques for future restoration.r* In talking with the neighbors about the variance, the one that expressed an opinion, felt as we do, that the wood structure was far more desirable than the option, a metal pole barn. We think we've found a barn style and height that would fit our needs and look very nice. We feel that if this particular barn does not work out, we would still have had to apply for a variance as we would want to put up a pole building with 10' sidewalls to accomodate our equipment. Thank you. ^^ncerely, v. Ronald E. Miller 270 N. Willow Drive We are asking for a height variance for this building or a simular building that would meet the building codes and the 1400 sq. ft. requirement. •• > ■ ,' 7'. tiTMema ;rj -r ;ri r 3»V1 isiC V0i6 sM 09 w9 ♦s 3 - '-n 9% 1 “"§-"P?-P; (1 :: 19 i?9 09 0». aa NOion; •a 19 lO'^lO^lO w6 « ^0 - 3f- ® r>p ^ ^ IM m «r ^ 08 ^ S i ^3 08 ^ «**2 w 5a* 08 «a 3ivaN3i9 uOl OOl m ^»s »ik^ «x> ^^ 2— - ■» S»|» ^ 18*001 lonoi • 0*MI rs »r) • • -f-y - ' »' » ' H H K--* T0T5T cq;i9? \vy 0*C N ai - ’ ’ ". * • r ^’TiS W Qif - j; K*>»9 OK Sp •• w iOl SOI iiii 5 _II s«.Cil9Ii IH ^ -C 5 Z ZW «v (9)»f]\£r «COi __ail__001 // « tTTK M-l niH '/Ol / - 001 ’•r a* OCi 0 X K.Ml - 1 fw^ - mi • 5 1 m <>?' 1 OOt 001 00» i Plat of £ur ’re7 for Ronald Z, "iil'^r in the So';thw.3st lA of Sacoion :i-'.13-13 THIS m HUS SE^mmms I I Certificuta of Sur/ev: I hereirr certify, that this is a true and correct reoresentation o- a^eurvey of the bo'.mdariee of that oart of the Southwest ouarter of Section .A, US Month, Hanco 23 West cf the 3th Princioal Meridian, cescrioec as .ol.ows. -e-inning- at a ooint on the •-est line of said Southwest ouarter at a ^in. 1876 ^ee+ Mo-th o^ tho Southwest comer of said Southwest ouarter; thence SoJ-h along Laid West line to a point 1C1S.375 feet (61-3A rods) South of the comer of said Southwest ciartar; thence East ^rallel with the oouth — said Southwest ouarter a distance of 693 feet (12 roos); thence ..orth ^rallel with said West line to the point of Intersection with a line e^anoeo oaster-y from ooint of beginning oarallel with said South line: thence West along sa. extended line to the ooint of berinrlng, the location of all ex.s-.ng aui.—ng-, if any, thereon, and the prooosed location of a proocsed building. It -oes no- tniroort to show other inproveirents or enemachsents . Scala Date o 1" = iro' 6-2-76 Iron tnar ’.cer Gordon ?.. Coffin I,'.nd Sumeyor and Planner Long Lake, Minnesota >T- ♦ tv.. •6C61 .t •jr'H* - ? • ' .* * ♦ • ;■< «. .«*• :'&■ « a*. ^ ^ t « i I • • I •^*4*-' - • ... »*.- mmr- . • • > TV • r -.o I — •• c- *‘^.% - ,; • •*• ’«f *• ' . ^ •’•M'- r'-'^ «»?r ••• -0i • ♦ - • ' -' .%s .r^::ur ‘«a \ ^ ^:p^ r.ihx- ^ s .i* ■■ ..^ ■:I i/^ f i ytru - - i W V . T.:-•^•^ f . •»!.*. ;* . * 4* *■s ••r •^.-r’^ - — ‘ - rr- r t - r- ^««k- - f R) .-.4 f--;. ^ ^ k \«^r * • '>■ mtmt. •r/ i. J I.'--izrnr mil 1 : ;-I I««- i -r-- r* % —• •*«. V * «• jk ^ ^ ' 4*m^^Xrn t*. I ^ ^ 1- -..? •.—•, ^ ’ -\; -■‘."uy ^. ‘•■v V I. • % . . . •• • • « V .4- . ^' c Ij;« u - - rjd • tff ^*. r'rv *. j I r ‘*' r,* -• ;^i >V • '4T /•..jl J«,.aW., ■■-■»?* • i. mKTJK; •%4.. A^4 A t:f! v;^- i.- U- -.,. V-, .,,'«-i^f V . SrT-.r 1 * ............ £*,•>.■• V~ • f. *v ’^. .h I • . • iw •. rvr ~- ^ TL^- '^^'• ■» *»r>'^53 • ;iti ^ ' «^- . * . . •/iJ ‘ f ^'■ 'm tyj- ' <’*?,■KSi’i r??£5i;a5i trr V./: *:•?;= ■ r . .\ I * »’I • ♦ '« *,'. *> ft'.. Hi ■ X^y^': - • .5* i » 'V r.'' :.•il t.*yj ** ;. ajfrrg^M?:W-i 2!p5^i;ft ’ :-r.i.. r‘:V ■ iPWs«-4fw.:Lji^A - H ■: •;■ H'. f ■:- MM WP\ t Li r*'M 1^ • V|t ilj-..^ I itim 'll i i ^ axY"^ ~ K .r OF raRONOr CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66* Crystal Bey, Minnesoui 35323 •Muniapel Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka I March 12, 1990 <S nald E. Miller- 270 North Willow Driv r)Cf MM-§535 RE: Proposed Barn Dear Mr. Miller; Thank you for your March 9 letter to Jeanne Mabusth regarding your barn proposal. Jeanne asked me to respond to your request regarding zoning concerns. A number of factors come into play for this type of structure. I would note the following: 1. . From a zoning standpoint, your lot is exclusive of a 50' right-of-way for the road south of the house, and a 33' right-of-way for Willow Drive. Therefore, your lot dimensions are (3.06 acres). 202.09' X 660 or 133,379.4 square feet 2. Setbacks for the barn will be measured from the edge of the 50' right-of-way rather than your south lot line. 3.At 27' X 44 or 1188 square feet, this barn would be considered an "oversized accessory building", but would be allowed subject to an Oversized Accessory Structure Covenant, since it is less than the 1400 square foot oversized building allowed on a three to four acre lot (see attached accessory structure ordinance). 4. As an accessory structure, the barn may not be located any closer to the south lot line than the existing house setback. 5. Also, any barn for the housing of animals must be at least 75' from all property lines; again, we would measure this setback from the road right-of-way line rather than your south property boundary, hence the barn would have to be moved back about 20' to meet this criteria. BUILOI.NG i ZONING - 473-7357 ASSESSING ADMINISTPATION A FINANCE - 473-7358 FAX-473-0510 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 r, Ronald E. Miller, 270 North Willow Drive Pa9e Three of Three March 12, 1990 s«uct5ra°"height variance ^woul“*’be 'approved? J1 °hl l°hted) ^^'^A^variance^pplication would have to be submitted highlighte J• order^to be scheduled for a public hearing SfSr ?!:e“‘nannin"c:™“sion on April U, with the earliest possible final City Council action on May 14. Please contact me or Jeanne Mabusth if you have additional questions regarding this project. Sincerely, i(<'/4 ronMichael P. Gaf" Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator MPG:tjs Enclosures 1. 2. 3. 4. Variance Application Accessory Structure Ordinance Amendment Miscellaneous Pertinent Code Sections Oversize Accessory Structure Covenant 7 f /r 1 r.‘ .-i-^ ;; (’• ! *T—^ March 19, 1990 To: Adjacent Property Owners RE; Land Use for Variance Application Dear Neighbor; We had proposed to build an auxiliary storage building, pole barn, approximately in the middle of our property. Several weeks ago a wooden barn with gambrel roof and hand split shakes became available. The building seems to meet the zoning requirements, with the exception the height. The Orono zoning code states that no accessory building can exceed the height of the principal building. The barn does exceed the height of our house by about 4 feet. We wish to apply for a variance and are required to make you aware of the application. 1 » The Planning Commission meets and will decide on April 16 with the Council meeting in May. _Thank yo.u. Ron Miller 270 N. Willow Drive Long Lake, MN 55356 .r t»» .'j I i C CjC^ I:: ^ CCi|cd2 • • 5 5 «Mo «u O 0 •Oa •J 1 I ou u Ok uo 4JI •o• M M• %4 9 U U Cl i 0 § , AT> Q a# ii > 8i >*4 o« iH 4 C ■• O' TJ 9 iH oc u >• «aou Ok 9 U 9 9 9 A V 4iu •*-» o »4a %4o M Oa i3 O* V M Ma 3 M O <M olr 3 •H i3 •H 4> O M S; r. x: u o*a 9 U « M iH •Huc 9ou ««oaoua e *1 4 X3 4i iH 4> O Uaa 4 >i U 9n u U 4 x: Xi XJ 4 x: xi iHa 4i 4 3 - ? - 8 xi 4 U 0 H S •o G 4 ilu 9 •Oa 9 4 4 iH U••o uo %4 •oc 4 fi o 4> •H %4 Ccu « G 4 iHa -H> U 8 -5 >< k> U 9aoua •H XI .M 4 4 O XI 3 XI O G iHr.a< >t fH 4 i« 4a XI G 4a 4>o Maa •H •H 4 % U & 4 .1 iH •H U k' ou 4 4 M ; s 3 xJ 9 X) 4 X3 XI 3 4 4 D «Mo •Mo s •o G 4 xX 4 4 U 4 4 4 4 4 t - I O XI Ma uo XI 6 »9 4 U M 4 *M 4 M i> O M o 4 H 4 XI G 4-a 4 QK •9 4 •H > O G M U 4 & lxa XIu 4 4 X3 XI a 4 oua A %4o 4 M O X) £ O' \ r{ 1 i 1=! U XI ^ l4 S i 0 2 <M 4 •H X3 XI O' G iH 4> O Maa 4 4 'H M ^ XI 4 X3 XI 4 G XI 9 U 4 M 4 o u G 9 Oo •o 4 4oao Ma \ XI 4 X3 XI iH 4> O ixaa 4 >% XI 4 X3 xl 4 JZ XI XI 4 G xl U O TJ G • 4 4 XI 4 4 X3 Xl - 8 : 4 XI 4 Uo iH oz TJ G 4 XI 4 U 9 TJ G 9 U 4 rj e o XI •H %X c o u i ®4 MH Q, a a 4 4> >t XIu 9ao G O XI 4 U M 4 4 O Xl XI O G >» •H 4 ix 4a xl C 4a 4>o uaa •H U ou iHa 4 tx 4 4 U H 9rr >« t: 4ao I 4ao Ma 5' \ V I ^ \ xl u 4ao 8 %x «• “o. ^3 *H 73 Mg • 4«J5 5 47J ^XIJ ^ O -H i5 « •rtn a ^8XI _o ^ uo-J 3 Mfi4 9 2 M W« O 5-3 5aIsXI 9 2 • u • M6 4 a q 4 25. 4 O*^2 4%73 O O C •H ^ O •H «H 4>•3 SG-H 5 4rj.H i3 • 4 " y 9 D >H 5 o%x 4 M *J O' • c;c j: o Xl M %x *• “o. 83 >3 . A XI cxi O' ^ 0-S 4 •--8 4 ^ 58^ XI ul •2 M«g:?s • 4 a SsXl 9 4 MI5^ a *2 -S3S ^ 4{; a 4 axi 5V^25 9 0^ S.-832°%x 4 M k4 (4 9 tH i , 10 If "pH c ^. in i‘ 4X 1 «S ^ ou fc a Vj §•15 I mmo %4o T3em •4 QttI •o amo ?u Of m« o ii M O f HI a f3<< s i T3 o Vi M« «4 9 U >ou om •H 4 9 4i o fl 0« • « 4 «J f S. ^o 2u ^ ” oa u 9 •C ^ M ^ • O i) o - ^ ^ > ^5 *i c N •4 £ U Oko Ma s - do •H U 3 rH I > o IS ^» " 1- s ? 5 g fl o ^ • 9 ^ S > M• o ^ d 5 g; • 41 ? -o d ^ i4 c •C 2 o < 41 3 IM *2 o fld 3 M 9 ^ ^ *1*M d o d M 2 O il • u d•d <0 «d d o fla M u 9 d > -J d ^ O 3 S • a.2 a M ® • "_ a S ^ d Z IS ^ fl d 9 r-l a «M O « M 3 i4 O M O « n =* du 9 9 ^ >1 d • 5a* s ? S 2 «1u a d 0» d d •• -C _ ** d >o d u d %- i o 1 iMa i 3vJ I d U Ok 9 O fl - □ M 5 I « •4 £ 41 O* d u o n jio» ^ ^•H nd 41 2 > d “ p IS ^ • "s «- § o 5 t "o « 5 a 5 .i • " <5V \ N A Sfl «*4 *0 2-3 j ai a «i 5J^ its »." ■ iJ" !S^ -W^ 4l d d d i: 41• "a2»fid 3 M fH 0 pH •1 •i o • d >,« *"'ck 2rij5 ■ O 'i?: aa 5 d M 5.2d u d d a O 0 “• ' *H « ••d c -ilflS -flS g‘S' o 'J il M dao l4a a ^s, 3 Q >H O ^ *1 >1^ %4S° M i4 cn d^^ c d o 41 N I c 0^ tN «U °tr J5 >2 ^3 d O H ?d 5 41 B du 555 ** I 3 -"a M -C” u ■-Q •«4> . - d 3 ^ d O • d >, d ’-. 3. •S 41 d d d 41 *3 d 41 duo r4 oz > d M do >4 *J t* dM o d -H a Mo -• M 5 d •H -s s•a 2 o d 41 Ou a o X 41 d ^ d >. d r4 2 ^ d O M M ® • d •9 d d 41 du 9 TJ d 3 d -H 3 fl o ;i I N 41 44 0a d ^ 41 3 d d 14 o d u C 9 Ok 0 9 2^S°2 '^9** s;:*a 0 a«4 a**"^28 3 t3^ 0 *M >4*5 %4do :i3» -5 i ! I [r 0^ m iH 8c %$4 mI¥ iCX 3»li • ■ • «3 « *» . D U ho■o« 6 ▼4 M Qi «M 0 : 0 0 1 M Qt Uo 4«s 9> Ou 53 Cm *i mm ou 5J Uum %4• • o«■ r-« 0 a u Qt \J . PuI a M ^ Ot • * Q 8 ^ ^ (SJ I. • ^xs o U 4J V S J M >s ^• • Gb ► O ^ & o 2 Co •r4«> u a fl 0 V il 0 uo M ^- 5s ^2 ^■ a•o* • 53 XS • 4J r-l > ^O Oo u« « xt 41 <Mo • M » 4 Mm a« *• «« 0 uo 4Juo f-» o t4a M O X3x:tr Hm>ous 3 •H •0 0» O 3 O • *3M a• s 5 ^^ a 41 a 4 X3 41 • M 4 fH U • 53 O ii 53a 4 41 M M • 53 ^e ia a« *• ^a 4>^ o M “ 'mu 4 4i 4 JZ 4. ua 0ou >« 41 •Hu • X3 4i U O 5 •*4 %4 G O U o 4i 3s rH • i4 a« 4i 0 i3 « C 53 Oaoua 4 43 *J 41 4 43 44 53 C 4 4 G 4 •H a 4J G•a >ouaa 4 43 •H 4> O Maa 4 •H -H U ou •I« M ■H 0 S’ il Ov <K \ \ v> N >4 V «M «• 85 >5 *- 3 • •"3 5 S'”tH 43e«g> O -n 10 = S‘lil T-i 1°s > . ^44 a a o §:«• Tl^ 4 5 ®2 -•i- • a«i •I""550 o ^ O _ %4 >^*0%4Co %4 4 M *J a* *5 s4 C 43 O 44 M \j <' e 1 ! » aI I V) 5 D « ■OO C • 34 0 4 4 O 44 i! s 4o S’ ? “• s ii 4 O «u - 2 %4 O ‘{• i {4 -r- s % 1 « -w ^ (V o 4 iH 4 & Ua. =2 > 0 M 1 3 Si O r- <M ^ 4 44e >•1>ua i s r-ia • 43 44 s 8 •»4 > M > 44 4 53• 44 4 O O iH >. 44 M•aou Co -H 44 3 r-i a 1^^ • 4 0 l4 O M >* . « 8 ^ S “• 0» 53 4 •H 8 c M U 4 4 s4 43 44 O* G «-i 44 0 U• M 4 .3 <«4 53 G 4 44 4 U 9 53 G 0 •> • 43 44 %4o r-i 4> O ii £ 4 4 m>o l4aa 4 • M 4 fi (I • 53 O 44 53• M 4 4 44 Oa «Mo 9 M 4 y 4 "5 il 4 9m 0 l4o 44 O 9 TS o Ma uo 43 43 O' -I 44 4 43 44 fi •H Uc 0oo >• 44 • 45 44 II O %4 e "H %4 Cou o 44 >» M a c 53 m %4 «• “o. y G 9 -H 2^4 • “*! 55- e 44 0» 5 C 0-H •2 4 4 • 2? 44 U ^ If»s tH { ?: V’.«.i(r i- I v‘.. I X \V 4 Va- o <s rCl cs' -s . i 3 -a ^1 j- -1 C ^ <-27. o s .0 <5> 3 S i V> 1(5 f'J 8 ►- % o'O I fv» rJm S’" OD~00 w 2 tA rJ 13 •A . "a S -A AJ -X O «<o <o 2r m i» K Art cO I :r (V» o *j . D Zoor c^ »»C3.V . « >J .NJ ii tj c<\ 'o C^J5 5 D 8 o %4o ma T3a 4 9 >Uo ? wm o »ua o 4i 5 4i Q •n • M M • %4 u 9 A4i £ i o om •H 4 B I? il. 4f ^ 8 d 5-^3cr I & 'j cj I*--3 o 14 —J ^ O » 3 - a 4 M ^ . tj 4ia 8 O* \» 4 r-l >o oa M M u 4 4 > 9 S ■H a A a 41 4 4 9* *Ha •o 4 U 4 > 4 4 U 4 4i U 4 8 O Ma 41 4 A 41 M O A A 0» ■H 4 d -H 4« 9 U 4 H 4 *H •H U d doo 4 4 Oao 14a o IN) 8 N ro N I |A i> rsJ i-1-1 .'A ^ ■f ««C 44 9 ^ fV • cr a • ? ^ -W ‘ 4 3 4Jt£ O. —^ X.7 ^J o cr V'• 2 p V X ^ >A V or V--7 -r ^4-r 0 -Vo=CO %4 «• 85 •H-o •:J *-9 4 a 41 •■3 4 5.- 0 4i a •H 41 4 A 41 r-| 4 > C Maa 4 >% 41 •Hu 4a 4i 4a 4i ii 4 4i i *o 4 44 4 U O M •9 d 4 4i 4 U 4 4f O 4 M 4 Mu•8 M O %4 B O 4i *»4 > 4 M 4 > 4 >• V I# 4aou do •H «i 4 U Maa 4 44 4 4 •H %4 dou *9 d • H i s *-• tk a 4 O 41 41oa 4 N 4« d 4 « 4>o Ma■ M ■Hu ou 4i 9 4r M 4 M -H 9 IT 353 4 S'J«!lS"1"m4 4 9 2 4 O • 4>,4 ■So 4 M•5 g 4 aO 4 •• t:s ® O O “-S 4M _ o» ><m A 9 I h 4 o 90^ O — %4 %4d o %4 4 M *J 4* rir u O vn 4 vr i-j ^ 0 \0 rH ==tfc o ,.3i •■I I * I ‘ »S Pfl \'T^ > I ■ .^'\.r», rr- '"•->>»• -!*7.'v>' * *I , i{ », 'r*>k • •'v V; y ^ ^ J wV> '• ____ N. • > ^ •. J^ . ... %i' . f I \5^ To:Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Proa: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusthr Building & Zoning Administrator April 12, 1990 #1515 Jeffrey Johnson, 3825 Cherry Avenue - Variances - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances - * vY* ' % • Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (3)(B) - Although the County has confirmed that the three parcels that make up the homestead property can be legally combined. Technically a variance must be granted to this section of the code because the lakeshore lot is divided from the homestead portion of the property by an unimproved platted right-of-way. Hence the dock classified as an accessory structure cannot receive credit of principal residence. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (A) - The code requires a principal residence on the lot prior to construction of an accessory structure. Once again, the County confirms the ability to legally combine the three parcels. Section 10.22, Subdivisions setback/hardcover. 1 and 2 - Lakeshore A) The 200* length dock will encroach the wetlands area located above the 929.4' elevation and is located within 75' of the defined lakeshore at the 929.4' elevation. The DNR is reviewing tne portions of the application that involve structure at or below the 929.4' elevation. The DNR also advises that the Corp of Engineers will be reviewing placement of the dock in relation to nagivaticnal issues in the immediate area. The total dock consists of COO square feet of hardcover structure, the majority of which is located below or at the 929.4' elevation. Hardcover within the 250 —500' setback area: Area * 23,183 s.f. Allowed Hardcover ” 6,954.9 s.f. or 30% Existing Hardcover ■ 2,790 s.f. or 12.1% (refer to Exhibit E) m Zoning File #1515 April 12, 1990 Page 2 of 5 List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D ■ Exhibit E * Exhibit F - Exhibit G • Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Application Applicant's Addendum Property Owners List Plat Map Hardcover Facts Enlarged Plat Map - Survey - Construction Plans for Dock : »ai.cent property Review of Application - The "cVnsi^^^^^^ predominantly low lyingBav View, a substandard lot consisting ot p obviously the lot is portions of p„/pcne of tho unsuitable for residential develop ^he homestead •pSI?ili'trtrproprr?;‘rn .lae o, cherrv Avenu. ?please refer to Exhibits C, D and I).OC -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - The ..jorit, o, the dock will be construot.d^wltM and unimproved ?^e northeast corner. The dock will applicant's homestead lot at the no . ^^e applicant hasK 3- wide and 200' in l«"9th. Although ^tne^ PP. ^ ^ referred to the dock as * P®^"*? reveal the posts placed constructed with g'^aie ^pr^ovided with the drawing, it is everv 8', as there is no scale pr «-he 929.4' waterline. difficult to determine ^®dnr Fisheries and Wildlife This issue will be s*^***^®®®. «-h*r the posts installed within the division. It is recommended the posts lumber. The lakebed be P°®^f. ’"Aim the west lot line. Planningdock/catwalk is s.'.own 5 concerning the required Commission should * faar^^^ The dock placed on the lakeward side setback. Is 10' su^ect to all pertinent LMCD side of the property would P® s 3 walk moves ordinances for the upland or dry land area northward towards the , ication is being reviewed by I„ di,cu..i»ns iXuS!'’ ?L“NR"S”ew will addres. th. following concerns, 1 I; * ■* Vv. . Zoning File #1515 April 12, 1990 Page 4 of 5 1. The portion of Cherry Avenue the proposed catwalk Structure would cross is totally wxthin the wetlMds/lakeshote and is not used for roadway pur; ..sas and is currently unimproved. 2. The legal combination of the substandard lot will ^e tied to an adjacent homestead parcel ah's J subject of a land use independant of any homestead. 3. The proposed dock structure meets the LMCD In authorized dock use area for a dock with one slip d slip per 50 lineal feet of shoreline). 4. The property consists of predominantly wetlands and lakeshore. 5 There is no adverse impact on adjoining o ‘r the pub?lc generally as a similar ^c^k and structure has existed on the property to the without any record of accidents or apparent hazard to the public who use the adjacent main lake and roadway. Options of Action - Denisl. If denied, ple.se refer to the necess.ry findings within the variance sections of the Zoning Code. Approvel. If »Pf"°7Vroprii« flndinU°Sn3’S«5shTpi ro"tJ^^rbo"vV"b^y “e°p”p‘l!l.«! *^4prlv ”l”.o^ld b! subject to the following conditions: 1 D.-'imhf f-ilino the variance resolution by the City, ippU«'n°t m‘u.t“.ppl? fSr the legal ccmbin.tion of the three parcels• 2. upon epplic.tion for a v\e'w ^nd wAlk/dock structure on Lot 2, Block J# urysi-a j 4.v»as unimprSved Cherry Avenue, applicant must submit the following: A) survey showing any "Jf„°/_P^°^p®f^nniIIg ^SmmiMion'tl alvise if 10- side setback i. necessary along land portion of property. B) Approval permits from Corp of ^"9^”®®/®\ Orono Public Works Department. Please not® executed agreements/liability insurance to be ai emitted with the building permit application. Zoning File #1515 April 12, 1990 Page 5 of 5 3. Posting of catwa llc/dock structure with "No Trespassing/Private Property" signage. 4. Based on standards of LMCD - the dock shall be limited to one slip. r I j • • ifCITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATIOlfc^^ Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Addres3.'^.(^£^<" f k'kwWW hv & r% tizrui I I i/t u.‘l\kntl/cuiMirr nrrrrct ut I AWL. .iJk/v^w^ywv . .. ..^ 'E/ 175.00___ \/x ^rum’ nWI?W>(0,. f c"r V * vvL^rr70’r[ZruM’k '‘ 'M' 7V^>.r-nJL I Ck/\/v w vvA iWA I vJ/»w J/Vv ^e-/'7-<^i3-3.3- CC^ I Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ^('r^~7 Please checlc one - Property X. abstract or _ _ torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Phone (home)^/7/ Name A r a/aA7C/J Phone (wor)c) ~J - ^c!L ^ Address0///&/C^K City: 0/?CA.'0 Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) Phone (wor)c) Address:City: Zjp: Date Prooertv Acauired imontn/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent par-els of land. PRESENT OSE OF PROPERTY Present Zonina District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: /o ^A /b CX~/<' /^c^l ^>.»rrvD A-vJ. 7^ r^cc T Lot Area Setbac)c Variances ( Lot Width Front ___ Hardcover Side Rear) Other 7^ r>Cxr./f HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; /o 'A'c^P/tjZIV DESCRIPTION OP ONDSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements i ,i ryT" z 'V/7yy/^ r-p^-/'yL/>^AC. V.y'/^/^PA r? REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Stamped/ legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature _______________________________ Date_______________ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agree? * ' provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Adminiourator , agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Icnowledge. \ ^ ^ DateApplicant's Signature OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acJcowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. , Date /^DOwner's Signature Applicant must have Al Ci^Smirktals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission 'Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please malce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meetina. TO:Mayor and City Council Members Planning Commission Chairmon and Planning Conunission Members FROM:Jeffrey Johnson 3825 Cherry Avenue Orono, MN DATE: RE: March 23, 1990 Variance Request I purchased Lot 2, Block 3 Crystal Bay View with the intent of providing lakeshore access for my homestead at 3825 Cherry Avenue. This lot was purchased from Marion Schulz of Philomath, Oregon. My request is to grant a variance to the City Code to allow the construc tion of a permanent dock from my homestead property across platted right- of-way of Cherry Avenue, across the wetland portion of Lot 2 to the shoreline of North Arm. The dock will be approximately 3* wide by 200' long. The portion of Cherry Avenue that the proposed dock would cross is totally within the wetland area and is not used for roadway purposes and is unimproved. By granting this variance request, the City of Orono can be assured the use of Lot 2 will be "tied" to an adjacent homestead parcel and will not, at some future date, be the subject of a land use independent of any homestead. This request does meet the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District's criteria for authorized dock use. I feel that this request meets all of Orono's requirements for a variance, including hardship involved with the land itself, uniqueness, and no adverse affect on adjoining property owners or the public generally. (H 0 S I-1 m •*I m aflO »o f#l O UJ tl ji- •HI o o o Ml O O s o <»- o A oco us5 O' lA O 0 tA Kl Kl X lU CNi M ^ 1 Of -J K Q 3 M 2 u |H I mJ too o < CNJ ex «0 X CO ro Lu MOO Ui M tt (A Z O lA WU X md CO 3 S 2 ^ -J Q < Z K < < SON CO CM >• Ui CO < O Kl z s CM ^3 O 15 < O Kl O O Xu ►- <o o 0 O Ui > Kl < Kl >• Kl ac CM (X 1 Ui X^ u 1-4 I COo o CM CO CO Kl Kl O hC,o Ui o ^ M O K- Ui CO “S a: CO<( fr u Z Ui nO > Kl < lA lA > a “zX 2 u o« PJ «0 - Kl Z (X o o vT O Uio o: O >j- X Kl CO Kl X CM JII -0 < a. Ui 10 <?| cc a O' Kl lA lA iliisE^ z *0 a- S< •H Ui <0 KJ CO o o ^ >- CO Kl 3 CO < Kl O Ui Ui Kl Z COo Kls o Kl Kl CM• c5 2 “§< 3 O i-C n < ^^ a. Ui Kl X •« 5 X i|l|= Q Ui Z ^ CO ^ Z < Ui SO IM CO o o *H >• Kl 3 CO «5 O Ui Ui Kl Z I COo COKl M « QC Z Oo < oe q a z Ui ^ < >- N Ui Kex z o 0^X0 O Z Ui 4 •< > \ Ui ex g|«| S > V UI PSoe z a ra < ex q a z ui ^< > N eo ^ K O Z mJ< >- (X < Uiipia o H ee < uj a. w a zsiss Q. O »- Ipia o K- cx < uj Ss§^3 g a 2 “ ex ^Ip aao <( \ I i 't'.V:. ■ -'i •• yiUiiaiuaatttiu^ASiBa&3fias&aaHBaiM lO HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK zone: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250'(250^^500^ 500-1C00 Existing Hardcover in Zone y / -V -7 ' A. HniisE /C-v X ^ /=. /s^a S.F. LENGTH WIDTH X 3 S.F. X 3 S.F. X 3 S.F. X . S.F. n. Garage x 3 S.F. r. Driveway x 3”0/» /. 000 S.F. X S S.F. 1 . t n. SinPWALK X /0 -S.F. X S.F. X 3 S.F. E. ^ATIO/ . , /O V 2o',, a^Qo S.F. E.lANnSCAPE X .S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN RY . X S.F. PLASTIC , , 30 S.F, a' X /o‘= 60 S.F. R. Dthpr X 1 CXC>S.F. Toy T^ST, Total Hardcover in Zone S.F. Total Property Area in Zone S.F. /^crr" A -S-TTG, -?. B 23.|fi3.X 100 - / 2 ./ I . \ 4.07" 3 V l^CO sr ////E'iyi.cV'CC^ PROPERTY INCLUDED (3 P.I.D.'s) 1 lakeshore lot »i 23 j 24 j 25 ' 26 27 Z^ZS ^ IV^-C^ Res.f>op«V-'7b /^nT Minder.Engineering Co.,Inc. ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS LA n O ®VjQve.ViisiO CIVIL Ik MUNItClP^L tNOIMtCniHO eoiLa TESTIMO LXNO PLXKIKIINO C4ld-5CT** AVEMUE N. MINMEAPOLIS “iT, M\MN. KE T-5C3T C^riinlFaCfi^i^ <»lf IKliiPTiB'^r * **- r* .A.*- • - • • ---------- ' * / _ • • • • ------------------- •' * ’> • !‘w r • •• *—•— ; V • . • • • \ - \ >■{ \ • . V / \ \ ■.< . * ^ ■ \ iw n u y*• \ \ r^‘ 6' n • ■,....• ^ • •. c'.r j i f*.' -------« *N C:\* ^------- — A •* "'■J I -''4 * i •<- -d f 4 • • •4? • / # •I -■ j •' ~U 0 .• . A. • • .• •«* • x, CTf^yj^rj. , I i ] m CCaXIPY THM THIS 15 MRUC AWO COaOECT R£PR.tSEMTATlOM OF K SURVEY OF TMt BOUWOAA\E5 OF THE eAno A50VE DESCRIBED AND OF THE LOCATioM OF ALL BUILDINGS ^ IF AwY, TWEREOM , ^V40 W-L VISIBLE EHCROF,CHMEMTS, IF hH>i ^ FROM OR. ON SKIO LAND. OMi:'KJO 1*5 f MIMDER 'LH61WEER1NG CO., INC. MO ^ SUCLVIYO^SeNO«HCEQ.S . J \ H « . •* 2JC12^ L" CepAe P<>sr-b; Of?77?K47^ 1•^X^ ^ ME m 66£ ty*^H U/AJBC. UO& • . • «» «• '* * * c:&^^S7^ocr/cyJ K\f. ‘^'/iv- ’ .f.. V- • ^^‘' T’•J ■-- V -' %'- ' ' ^V ' V* V' * 1 I ‘ *v»V ‘ t ^ V.i" ' \ *'; *•, •'‘ t ' l -'r ^ y ^ 1 1-’••/?; ; i ..V ,| -V;.;i /X.:5.vrr • :/.■;-//•.■’;■ ‘! y.>.? ••ir^-|.i)’;^^g •' ^ ^ cJ^BSOl Z^<s/g-^>s ‘'/Ws/-si^ rRc^Ky=^ ■ To:Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Proa Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date April 12, 1990 Subject: #1518 Big Island Veterans' Camp Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (D) - Overnight Ceunping - cabin use. One cabin requires 1.0 acre in area. Proposed 5 cabins requires 5 acres. The remaining 25 camp sites require 12.5 acres. Day recreation use at 240 user level requires 12 acres. Proposed level of use: Total Area Required ■ 29.5 acres Existing Acreage = 57 acres Section 10.31, Subdivision 8 requirements. - Yard and setback Separation setback: Required = 10' Proposed = 40'+ Lakeshore setback: Required = 75' Proposed = 75' Section 10.31, Subdivision 11 - Minimum requirements for cabin construction. Total area of cabin =» 572 s.f. 22x26' A) Foundation. Pier foundation requires variance to this section consistent with repairs to foundation for existing cabins in 1987 and 1988. B) Minimum area for cabin: Required = 400 s.f. Proposed * 572 s.f. C) Minimum width required: Required = 20' Proposed = 26' D) Roof design satisfies required standards. E) Minimum plumbing standards not applicable as area is less than 600 s.f. Zoning File #1518 April 12, 1990 Page 2 of 5 F) Additional requirements: 1. smoke detectors for bedroom area; 2. each cabin supplied with approved fire extinguisher labeled for Class A, B and C hazards and minimum extinguisher size shall be lAlOBC. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit P Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I - Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit L Exhibit M Exhibit N Exhibit 0 Exhibit P Exhibit Q Exhibit R - Application - Property Owners List - Plat Map - Before/After Hardcover Fact Sheets - List of Board of Governors 1990 - Map/Site Plan Big Island - Renovation/Reconstruction Plan Revised 2/28/90 “ Copies of 1989-1990 State License to Operate Camp Grounds Resolution #2613 Conditional Use Permit for Overnight Camping Site Plan - Southeast Area - Cabin Site Plan Board of Govenors - Financial Statement Elevations - Optional Cabin Designs Cabin A - Detail Elevations Typical Floor Plan - Cabin A Alternate Floor Plan - Cabin A North Medical Transporation Services - 1990 Update Letter Liability Insurance 1990 Season Campground Emergency Preparedness Plan Review of Current Level of Operation and Inproveaents - The existing drainfields within the southeast area and peanut row in the northeast areaare satisfactory, the picnic ''^i'thin picnic dock area has been completed and per staff s recent inspections, the septic system is near completion to serve the bathroom area within the picnic shelter structure. The camp proceeded with the 1989 season at a medium successful level. The septic systems appeared to serve visitors to camp. There are apparently no problems with existing septic systems as reported by Inspection staff during last season. Zoning File #1518 April 12, 1990 Page 3 of 5 The current plan proposes 5 cabins. *foV^the^1990 were to be approved for handicapped use, theylit 11 will be required for each of the 5 cabins. Please refer to Exhibit N, each cabin is equipped with a refrigerator and standard planning® Commission to coo\\"ng.”"^mat are-p^larning^o^lsslon Member,- thought, on this issue? The only variance required in the design of the This is consistent with staff finds this form of foSJ,"altiSn^:^I;“i=Sp?aSie fot fea^oia! irbfn,‘on an isXana tana base. Staff would ask the Planning Commission recommendation ^®'?arding setbacks for tne cabins, ^ subdivision 8 notes only a separation /o’" ^^^on and a few given lot of 10«. Applicant Seasonal rnllotion’Vo ^“oT,lira”l“,eVtic -eystem, are operating in satisfactory condition. Zoning File #1518 April 12, 1990 Page 4 of 5 General Conmients - The applicant has provided the required . . ^riT- t-hp 1990 season as set forth in Resolution #261J that approved both day use recreation and overnight camping at t^ffacility Nor?h Medical Transportation Services that serves this area of our City has approved the landing helicopter in case of a medical emergency (review Exhibit P). The necessary updated liability insurance Jes been submitted. You may use the list of exhibits as a check off list. Staff recommends approval of the current conditional use for an expansion of overnight camping use for the Big Island Veterans' camp that would allow 5 entitled "Site #1518 and grants approval of the variance to Section 10.31, libil^lsion U (A) allowin, pier foundations fnimriations Approval is based on the findings set tortn “ Resolution #26X3 and subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant to apply for a Joint Use Dock License from the City of Orono for the 1990 season. 2 All low lying shrubs and trees to be triced within 100' of the defined campsite area. This area to be maintained in same manner throughout camping season. 3. All 11 remaining buildings to remain secured as directed by the Orono Building Inspection Department. 4 All designated fire stations to be ready for use for J990 sLson arshown on "Big Island Site Plan for Overnight Camping** dated April 5r 1989. 5. Any Changes in signage for the *’* approved by staff. No signage area can exceed 50 s.f. 6. Appropriate signage must be Provided within ea^ detering the use of camp stoves within interior of caoin an pending recommendation of the Planning Commiss on, may be equiped with an electric stove/grill. 7. NO internal plumbing has been approved for the 5 cabins. 8. The City does not recognize the 5 cabin., as accessible to the handicapped. 1 Zoning File #1518 April 12, 1990 Page 5 of 5 9. All cabins shall meet the appropriate an«1 applicable minimum requirements of Section 10.31, Subdivision 11. This would include smoke detectors in all bedroom areas, and fire extinguishers per standards set forth in that same section. 10. Once again, applicant is hereby advised that if at any time the existing septic facilities are determined to be insufficient or falling upon the regular inspection by the Orono staff, that all or partial overnight camp use shall cease. Overnight camping at the 5 cabin/25 tent site level shall not be reopened for public use until applicant has installed adequate septic treatment facilities to support sewage demands of the camp. J.L <1 : i Q CIT3T OP ORONO - GENER^^/LAND.jSS PROPERTY LOCATION AM^ICATI^IR *•«135 ‘ /t' 01 ODi 150. OC cm 150.00 Site Address Xsl^lA C./_fick« ivtu eio l<£CEl?T-mKW^590 cool ;i3 - ii7-.2i-i'- ooo\ Property Identification Nximber (P.I.D.) j» - m~7-^ j-A.a - ooo\ Please attach legal description to application if not Included on required survey. APPLICANT Name 3 Vvavfie Address /^/*T A/. A S~h Phone (home) _ _ _ _ __Phone (work) -067^ City Rxu I Zip 3SIO? OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)_ _ _ _ 6,-<« ra.- ffcf ^-T Phone h~7gyName £ Address to Bax City Sycfiiio'*-, /)^» Zip ( Date Property Acquired } ^ ^ O (month/year) I (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee X $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $150.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain GradiIIg,*3M^alli'"retainin SithiJ 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Re *iew (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation with Subdivision Rezonlng (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Appeals Other — see fee schedule ( 1 ! : I i ,PRBS1^T USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District 1? Present Use of Property geo. so HA I • ■'. 1 t • I /•»» Residential Other (specify)_ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST ^ , 4. L‘ r - Describe request in detail: feailA p.g.'^u^atA-^v«T <zAu/t^—~S‘r j ■f »f tfuv .^<0 eyisfivid <Tau^ in T^U e ■5‘ot<1~U —2.: 2. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Certif ied Ip^iToV^^ Owners List of owners within 350' (you can this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271). Plat Map. , . ^ tCertificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). land Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate 1 any other persons you wish notified o.. this application. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF lARCT DOCUMENT A WORKING COPY (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SOBMI ■ The applicant and Property Owner must sign this remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certiflcatlon’by Clerical Department that Land Use Application Is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -“*^®—_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ “HSr vSi r in review of this application, and certifies is true and correct to the best of his/her Jcnowledge :ure - - - - - - -_Applicant's signatu: OWNERS SIGNATURE ^ . n„«4-.«nand furtherThe owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this ®PP^^jL\^ authorized reasonable entry o»to the property ^y“'j3»Vor%u "poser of agents, commi.ssion members, and Council memoers t Ft' investigation and verification of this request. , Date Owner's signature Applicant must have ail submittals into the City the third Monday of each month. _ Applicants must V review meetings of the Planning Corsnlssion _and 5f“n-=f3-„ff.«unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements^ to^ have^^ an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building S Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. o yt Ma. Sa S tel B i I- M# I Id p p pmm o O O te. P O tel Sp > p oo <M iss DC mm tel P P P fM fM Kl tM 1r^ 0^ tei O §•oo mil «M 1 mm %®2is^p fM P in O M So S p S«s O O J-o P fVi p p X K»n inin -5 z5 i go •-• o* m tel X u _ a X n P iM U M X P o^sr tel tel O B O. K i« a B V < < 5 o. o \J X ^ 1^? *-5g - ^ 15 SI M tel X ^ I • m w IS^£s I • BUl te. te. B O O 4'‘ ■; i ptt (M •M N* <9e tel I-< O 5 B O Oe fO in «M I r* I p fO 0 p 51 ji $ • I •o oo o o 13o o p «M Oo -1 -j p o te. telp o y 55 o ^ tel P ^ P o o >X B ** 15 tel O P M CM P 94 H te. P tel tel i E te. 2 K tel te- ►- tel tel BX a o n ft ^4 s 0 ®;{iS3O M « > J 1 p CM p o P nr ^ tel ^ -1 << nr tel B S 13 > P ^5=gy O O »-* P o ^ ^ 10 o ni P tew K| •-• p tel W B tel B S§o| “ ? Sf! ■£5?^ tel Ot SSoo S*?i^ “ 5 ya tel B c liS' B X C) O ^ B O O Z tel ^ B 5 ^ B tel B X -1 ^-» '>. I' '> ■ tea. a*a»B t T •l— 'iP/rM H,\G. T £fc.AMr C A • C/-J HARDCOVER CALCULATIOH WORKSHEET B £ R E. ^ SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0"75^ 75-250* 250-500* 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone S.F.A. H ouse ______^ x 3 T5'leiy^s liou>e'/' ^ u. '3^ Pl'd-V^ic SIo 'pH^v- ^3. fl< OAirAae ”* X /k_x 2. ->aQ| Wm¥^» *="^5^ / S'^4*-«ae ^^ X 0.. Sidewalk E. Patio / Deck F. Landscape areas UNDERLAIN ?Jast .c’ • sheeting G. O ther x X X X X width H aH ^cfosfj up) 9/ X "7 ^ 50 72 /4 7C? S.F. 1^^^ S.F. /; do S.F. 2 iO*/ S.F. S.F. ./ J.- - //gj- S.f. «r' 1? s O S.F, ^'C 6 S.F. s. F. ";• S.F. S • F • S.F. !1 S.F. S.F. S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone - -s.f. Total Property Area in Zone 5^ hc^rz •2. s.p. ^ O,io %/5.5i W B 2.STQ0W0 X 100 bl<S- X-LA jJO ^zrckhr>~ HARDCOVHR CALCULATIOfl WORKSHEET /t FTfc R m^>vcV» |, SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' Hardcover in Zone C a K?»’'5 A. House ____ DiVt’w^ Hall u^3 X P.'c^lc SUeli-f^^l' ^ 4- If/b X 2 « feu ' M i v«< « ' Ij ■ r. ^nniMPWAV /- X J S'^^va^c Eu'lliu^ w 0 X 0.. Sidewalk n We'-o cTab'v^f «»•' ^ X 5 /Vtfu> Deckj • 10 - X p. Landscape areas underlain BY PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other ^0 LENGTH WIDTH }(o y /4 5o Zz 7 Total Hardcover in Zone S.F • 74? S.F. Zii^s.p; 1.^ ^ S.F. S.F. /Q^ - S.F. 1}^^ _ S.F. S.F. _ S.F :2 840 _ S.F. S.F S.F. __ S.F. ___ S.F. _ S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. Total r.;oPERTY A rea in Zone s.f.B fp7i*^ ^[r ;^.S7o.ov «3 y ]no <9. 7__% -.IT f • V. » «T • •.*• • • m i J X BOARD OF GOVERNORS BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP March 20, 1990 Joe Backes (American Legion) 15708 Normandy Lane Minnetonka, MN 55345 (h) 949-2544 (w) 542-0794 Norb Bosiger (Purple Heart) 2945 Fairchild Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 (h) 476-6245 Gerard E. Kelly (DAV) 2809 Pahl Ave. N. E. Minneapolis, MN 55418 (h) 789-3934 (w) 781-7114 TV Don Knight (VFW) 1227 Lombardy Ave. Anoka, MN 55304 (h) 434-3577 (w) 757-4540 • • '4 ;.y Wilfred Viitala (DAV) 5700 Mt. Normandale Drive Bloomington, MN 55437 (h) 835-4083 (w) 291-1212 Alan Wisdorf (American Legion; 1809 N. Skyline Drive Burnsville, MN 55337 (h) 890-4379 (w) 890-4180 Big Island Caretaker's Cabin 474-1958 Larry Sharpe 1419 No. Albert St. St. Paul, MN 55108 (h) 646-9430 (w) 339-0674 f ‘I iy Ti <1 ‘ * •.»5 dr-', pSiiii MWimi ^mm§ 1 l^'L ;O0C9»xR / .•I .■\v»I^ PIC N 1C sn&trfK FI A/ N 5tcuit> atm P6PH 'h\c 0} ‘N 9 Af^ QTA* L ••>401111 •:-:<*Xv ;-:::;:\::v :*>>;:::n *;-:v :-:*: CHUIfl»| ''i 960 q AO »;S»liiii ^ • •»••••. \_jL^ si M ‘ •••••••••*• *li • tZ::!v:-:-::-::*:-<:*> •«•••••••«••• & • t • feiiiiiiiiliiiiiii «•••»• •*• • 4M friT^fi lliilii •:'!v v‘x: \Ta,-^ r«<w«« I •I .•X'.'M* JI«SI sfci*illlliiiiiilil 01 0 OfiRa^STAnoN • fciii*li*iiiiiiiiiill»ia^iii^^^ o /• / 4 BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP RENOVATION AND RECONSTRUCTION PLAN 14 DECEMBER 1988 REVISED 28 FEBRUARY 199C I Background The Big Island Veterans Camp was re-opened for day camping in July, 1988, after a period of clean-up and renovation. A number of the Camp buildings had fallen into disrepair and 32 of the 43 buildings on the Camp property were razed in 1988. The eleven remaining buildings were either ^enovated, secured or converted to storage use prior to Camp opening in July, 1988. In 1989, 2 new picnic shelters were erected - one of which includes toilet/ shower facilities. Objective This document sets forth the planned renovation of existing buildings and facilities as well as the construction of new buildings and facilities. The strategy throughout our planning activities has been to integrate the follow' ing characteristics: 1. Project Approach Each of the projects set forth in the plan is of a defined scope and will be initiated separately. While multiple projects may be under way at a given point in time and may support or rely on each other, the focus on approved projects will ensure their timely completion. 2. Incremental Funding As funding is made available to initiate a given project, application for its initiation will be made to Orono. This attribute also allows us to focus on current project completion before initiating ether un funded projects. 3. Project Priority Projects are arranged in priority in order to support the planned evoluT-ion of Camp operations. 4. Flexibility This plan represents our best plan for renovation and reconstruction. Some level of flexibility in priority and projects will be required but will be kept to a minimum. Operational Evolution The renovation and reconstruction of the Camp will proceed in three general phases: Phase 1 - Day and overnight tent camping facilities Phase 2 - Handicapped accessible cabin construction Phase 3 - Operational enhancement Some projects within a given phase may overlap another phase; however, the overall strategy is an orderly evolut'on of operational capabilities. Reconstruction and Renovation Areas 1. Southeast (SE) Area - Point Charming 2. Northeast (NE) Area - East of Peanut Row includes Peanut Row latrine site 3. North and Central (NC) Area - Includes all old buildings other than Peanut Row and Point Charming latrines 4. Dock and Playground (DP) Area - Immediately west and southwest of main pavilion 5. Northwest (NW) Area - northwest and west of playground (See attached map #1) Overall Concept Construct new picnic shelters and latrine/shower buildings to support day and overnight tent camping use. Renovate old main dining hall for use as a visitor's center and repair other existing storage buildings as necessary. Construct 15 handicapped accessible caoins in SE area. Expand services and buildings in NE and NW areas if required for additional day, tent or cabin use. Phase One - Scope and Projects Phase 1 - Day and overnight tent camping facilities This phase provides for the erection of new picnic and bathroom buildings with new septic tanks and fields as camp use increases. This phase also includes renovation of existing bu'idings. (Complete) Project lA - (Complete) Project IB - Project 1C - (In Progress) Project ID - Project IE - SE picnic shelter construccion DP picnic shelter/bathroom construction visitor center renovation - foundation and other renovation - major on-going project DP latrine/shower building construction and septic field (will also serve tent campers in NW area) SE latrine/shower building construction and septic field (will be designed to serve 15 future cabins) Project IF - NE picnic/latrine/shower building con struction and septic field (tent camping area) storage building renovation - limited renovation of storage building to repair and improve security Project IH - NW picnic shelter Project IG - Phase 2 - Handicapped Accessible Cabin Construction This p.iase provides for the construction of 15 handicapped accessible cabins in the SE area. Each cabin will be connected to the septic systems installed in project IE. Refer to attachment for drawing and floor olan. Project 2A - cabin #6 Project 2B - cabin #8 Project 2C - cabin #9 Project 2D - cabin #7 Project 2E - cabin ^5 Project 2F - cabin #4 Project 2G - cabin #3 Project 2H - cabin #2 Project 21 - cabin #1 Project 2J - cabins #15, #14, #13, #12, #11. #10 Project 2K - handicapped ramp and trail construction improvement of existing hard-surfaced trails and building of sidewalks between cabins and to beach iV Phase 3 - Operational Enhancement Projects for this phase will be defined based on operational needs; however, the following general ground rules apply. The SE and NW areas are for cabin development, while the NE area is dedicated to tent camping, A monument has been considered for inclusion in the Camp and the building of a year-round house for the camp manager to provide security is also a possibility. ?-j;' - 1 w' w -- POST ONSPICUOUSLY ICENSE FEE: t33.75 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SECTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL FIELD SERVICES 717 DELAWARE STREET S.E. P.O. BOX 9441 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55440 1612) 623-5335 1990_FOR YEAR License no.:1245 ICENSE EXPIRATION DATE: 12-31-90 LICENSE TO OPERATE MANUFACTURED HOME PARK LIMITEO TO SITES V r n LICENSE TO OPERATE RECREATIONAL CAMPING AREA LIMITED TO: _________ OEPENOENT SITES L CATION OF PARK: rv Ertceleior Board of Governors Big Island Veterans Caisp 1419 North Albert St Paul, Minnesota 55109 LIMITED TO-0 INDEPENDENT SITES NOT TRANSFERABLE AS TO PERSON OR PLACE. TOWNSHIP Qrono COUNTY HENNEPIN DA TA CONTAINED ON THIS LICENSE IS CONSIDERED PUBLIC IN FORMA TION. HE 01226 01 di -imfos^ Vi V ./ 1 QX O •« »»»>■■ • ■• POST CONSPICUOUSLY LICENSE PEE:$75.00 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT CF HEALTH SECTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL FIELD SERVICES 717 DELAWARE STREET S.E. P.O. BOX 9441 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55440 1613) 633-5335 ________FOR YEAR;________1989 LICENSE EXPIRATION DATE: 12-31-89 Big Island Veterans Camp P.O. Box 598 Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 L .OCATION OF PARK: eiTY Excelsior J TOWNSHIP Orono COUNTY HENNEPIN LICENSE NO.:1245 LICENSE TO OPERATE MANUFACTURED HOME PARK LIMITED TO:_________________SITES LICENSE TO OPERATE RECREATIONAL CAMPING AREA LIMITED TO: 30 DEPENDENT ----------------------------SITES LIMITED TO:independe: SITES NOT TRANSFERABLE AS TO PERSON OR PLA( DATA CONTAINED ON THIS LICENSE IS CONSIDERED PUBLIC IN FORMA TION. ___ HE01226 V-:.: •-*. • . •' • ’ • I' 1 CITY OF ORONa City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 2613 t: A RBSOLUnOH GRAMTIIiG . A COHDTIONAL OSB PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.31r SUBDIVISION 3 (D> FILE #1385 WHEREAS, Alan Wisdorf, Chairman of the Board of Island Veterans' Camp, (hereinafter "the ^ X within property located on Big Island per Orono classxfxcation } the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally descrxbed as follows. Exhibit A, attached. WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the of Orono for^ Conditional Use Permit- to allow overnxght campxng proposed at 0 camp » user level of 120 per day based on the standard of 4 guests per tent. Minnesota; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning Pile #1385. 2. The property is located in the Seasonal Recreational Zonx^ District, per Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (D) 1, user will require 15 acres in area, the day recreation u e level requires 12 acres in area. The property consists approximately 57 acres in area. 3. on March 20, 1989, the Orono Planning the application as proposed and recommended approval based following findings: A) The 57+ acre site is large enough anv fdJe?!! recreation area and overnight camping ,^_^_^that areaffect upon the lake or upon the adDacent wetlands that located within the subject property. B) The proposed use will have no negative impact upon the neighboring adjacent properties. Page 1 of 6 1 City of OROrVO CITY OF ORONa RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2613__________ D) Toilet facilities us^^rfcreatioli ^and be in an approved of theovernight camp use. The City to fixturesovernight camp use. i\y-,eo«drng the number of fixtures ?e"^“ed“ ith\““ach latrine to serve 30 overnight camp sites. E) Security lighting to be re-inspected by staff prior to opening. P) Site of helipad to be ^Vg^tHSon” *“ updated written emergency procedure for G) submit a copy of current liability policy/coverage for both day use recreation and overnxght camping. 2. The approved plan of sSi?i"tted*bJ^Sif apVlicanVand attached as Page C of this resolution. .. ___________A O. Approval of a Joint Ose DocX License by the City of Orono and the L.M.C.D. for the 1989 season. 4. All change, in signage tor f”Ve°et."““ Staff. No signage area can exceed 50 q - if Mt. anv tiifliB tha axxstiin^ 5. Applicant is hereby insufficient or failing upon ««otic facilities are determined to be ^ -n or partial the regular inspection o°”"ight c^pin^ the 30 camp site overnight camp use shall c®”®* until applicant has i\%«\l%^“Vde",fatr..%“n“:r%a't°m%n\"‘’Aciliti.s to support sewage demands of the camp. 6. Authorities granted by tWVPV'oifv'lnd^m^.t'lil with the owner, but are approval or the special conditions of one year of the date of ^ate (April 10, 1990).this resolution will expire on that date lAprii 7. Violation of or non-compliance with of ^the^ te^™ of this resolution shall ^ority granted herein, and shallshall automatically terminate any authority g be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 3 of 6 I li I 1 CITY OF ORONOJ City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2613 8. The undersigned ovmer has read, understood and hereby agrees to the tec>cs of this resolution and on behalf of the Board of Governors of Btt^g Island Veterans' Camp, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 10th day of April, lallin. City Clerk J ^J(, Property Owner(s) - Jeime^R. Grabek, Msydr STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. CO^'NTy OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of April, 1989, by James R. Grabek & Dorothy M. Ballin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said Page 4 of 6 4 CITY OF QRONQD City of OROrVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2613 _ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) this ^ ) ss. day of d^/2.:LL~198 ^ Jnltr^ent, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Y . % // NOTARY PUBLIC DORS d COASH I /rtm !*"SSSS!ki my CC»1MI3OT^3!^^W iiwwo*3,19!)0| H AVV^Ai/V^A^W^A^^/V\^A^AA^^^A^»W M STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On thisf Hotiry public wi-STn “a?dlor said rn?°a"=Jnow!r/;a%“ i"ha\"“he “" (tr,y sV."rjrhi'i (their) free act and deed. , 198_, before roe NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 5 of 6 ■ Resolution # 2613 Zoning File #1385 EXHIBIT A Government Lot One tl'> ind Seventeen (117)r that part of Government Lot Three (3)r section Twenty-Three 23 , the Northeast comer of said Section Twenty-three (23 ’' f, Twenty-Three (23); thence Government Lot Three . to the Northeast corner of Lot A, Southwesterly along the 1*^^® . feet to Lake Minnetonka; ThenceMorse island Park; ^hen^e South 350 feet said Lot \\%nSrH%?^h“n^o%S:t"pla«’'c\ bepinnin, ,b.reina5t.r -tho property"); and ' i RESOLUTION 42613 i iJ U APR-61989 1*1 SlTB OVE* tfloH P LVN 5T0R a & t CAMP/N«* [n,-A sy 5ECURC.O pi!ii*ii.I* liii ,Ji* . ! k BOARD OF GOVERNORS BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 DMMILLER & ASSOCIATES, LTD. Licensed Pjblic Accountants February 13, 1990 To the Board of Governor? Big Island Veterans Camp Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 The accompanying st-tements of financial condition of Big Island Veterans Camp as of September 30, 1989, and related Statements of Income, Retained Earnings and Statement of Cash Flow for the year then ended have been compiled us. A compilation is limited to presenting in the form of financial statements information that is the representation of management. yJe have not audited or reviewed the accompanying financial statements and, accordingly, do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on them. D.M. MI.LLER k ASSOCIATES, LTD. 9001 E. Blocxnington Freeway, Suite 110 • Mlnr^eapolls. MN 55420 • 612-881-3003 • f BOARD OF GOVERNORS BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1939 ASSETS 09/30/89 3SSSSS33 RESOURCES Cash in Bank Cash in Bank Cash in Bank Checking Money Market Manager Fund 9,863.50 29,330.05 122.26 TOTAL RESOURCES 39,815.81 TOTAL ASSETS 39,815.81 SS33SS333SSS3 LIABILITIES k FUND EQUITY 09/30/89 S833SSSS LIABILITIES FICA Withholding Tax Federal Withholding Tax State Withholding Tax Unemployment Tax Accrual 1,622.16 1,296.00 345.00 25.20 TOTAL LIABILITIES 3,233.36 FUND EQUITY Fund Equity EXPENSE OVER RECEIPTS 38,351.98 -1,824.53 TOTAL FUND EQUITY 36,527.45 TOTAL LIABILITIES fc FUND EQUITY 39,815.81 SSSSSSS83SS3S .CTTC ArrnifiiT AWT ' c rnMPTf dTTr>T . 09/30/88 BSS3SSS3 1, 171.50 37,408.88 299.36 38,879.74 38,879.74 aa>aasssss3ss 09/30/88 2 224.76 216.00 87.00 0.00 527.76 2,822.40 35,529.53 33,351.98 38,879.74 asssssassasss BOARD OF GOVERNORS BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP YTD REVENUE STATEMENT FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 YTD 7.09/30/89 COMP 09/30/88 REVENUE Donations Received * Unrest Donations Received - Restric Memoria 1s Interest Income Sale of Scrap Promotional Sales Big Island Party Vandalism Restoration Refunds Received TOTAL REVENUE EXPENSES 30.5 0.0 13.5 2.2 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 57,737.50 0.00 S, no. 00 1,589.67 0.00 2,692.52 0.00 0.00 0.64 53.7 41.3 0.0 2.2 0.3 1.7 0.6 0. 1 0.0 39,005.00 50,000,00 0.00 1,623.50 202.05 1,265.00 444.00 72.45 0.00 100,0 71,730.33 100.0 72,612.00 labor fe LABOR EXPENSES Salaries Payro11 Taxes TOTAL LABOR & LABOR EXPENSES SUPPLIES 20,1 1.6 14,400.00 1,123.72 10.3 0.3 7,500.00 653.29 21,6 157523772 ”7772 3, 153,29 Managers Fund Special Assessments Bui Iding Repairs Repair Water System TOTAL SUPPLIES repairs 0. 1 0. 1 2.1 2.6 60.50 31.68 1,471.87 1,340.30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.8 "37454735 o7o 0.00 Machine Hire Equipment Repairs Equipment Replacement THTAf DCDATDC 0.6 0.5 0.0 420.70 393.51 0.00 13. 0 2.7 7.8 9. 453.25 1,987.09 5,634.17 1 u 1 AL KiLrAlnS iTT aT472l ”2375 17,074.51 -SEE ACCOUNTANT'S • COMPILATION REPORT- DOARD OF GOVERNORS BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP YTD REVENUE STATEMENT FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 YTD 7.09/30/89 COMP %09/30/88 ADMINISTRATION Postage 0.2 117.00 0. 1 44.50 Insurance 4.3 3,094.31 4,2 3,056.00 Permits >1.3 1,104.63 0.2 150.00 Legal & Accounting 1.4 963.80 1,5 1,099.60 Printing/Advertising 5.3 3,793.72 3.2 2,304.88 Mi see 11aneous 0.0 15.98 0.2 109.to Survey 1. 1 794.62 2.5 1,328.84 Office Equipment/Supp1ies 0. 1 96.37 0. 1 31.85 Big Island Party Expense 0.0 0.00 1. 1 309.00 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION "T3T9 97935743 "1371 9,483.77 OPERATIONS Electricity ic Telephone 2.6 '1,833.31 i.a 1,277.59 Dock Rental 0.2 130.00 0.3 195.00 Gas and 0i1 1. 1 81 ". 41 0.8 614.05 Volunteer Help - Meals 0.3 246.20 0. 1 84.21 Trash Hauling 0.0 0.00 0.3 200.00 TOTAL OPERATIONS '^“72 i70287i2 375 2,370.85 TOTAL EXPENSES ”457?”327aTI7i3 "5171 37,082.42 CAPITAL OUTLAY New Equipment 1.9 1,335.00 0.0 0.00 New Building 54.8 39,312.25 0.0 0.00 Pena 11ies 0. 1 95.98 0.0 0.00 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY “5s7fl "407743723 11o l • 1 o l 0.00 TOTAL EXPENSES AND CAPITAL OUTLAY 102.5 "7375547ai "5I7T 37,082.42 NET REVENUE OVER/-UNDER EXPENSES AND CAPITAL OUTLAY "-27*5 -1,824.53 48.9 35,529.58 .ctrt? /^r*r'AfiikT»rA>Tip'C fiT j otrcAt?'?*. BOARD OF GOVERNORS BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP STATEMENT OF FUND EQUITY FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1309 I • i .i Y-T-D e » >33 BEGINNING ,-UND EQUITY/(ACCUM. LOSSES) PROFIT/(LOSS) FOR THE PERIOD ENDING FUND EQUITY/(ACCUM. LOSSES) 38,351 38 -1,824.53 36,527.45 m -SEE ACCOUNTANT'S COMPTLATTOM REPORT- BOARD OF GOVERNOR’S BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Expenses over Receipts Increase in FICA Tax Increase in Federal Withholding Tax Increase in State Withholding Tax Increase in Unemployment Tax Accrual Net Increase in Cash FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Beginning Cash • October 1, 1983 Represented By: Checking Money Market-Unrestricted Money Market-Restricted Manager's Fund Ending Cash - September 30, 1989 Represented By: Checking Money Market-Unrestricted Manager's Fund -1,824.53 1,397.40 1.080.00 258.00 25.20 1,171.50 7,408.88 30,000.00 299.36 9.863.50 29,830.05 122.26 -SEE ACCOUNTANT'S COMPILATION REPORT- •336.07 -0- -0- 38,879.74 39,815.81 ( ssssssssaaa 39f B!5e81 saxaaaaaaaa BOARD OF GOVERNORS Si£lIiLANDlv|T|iANS_CAMP authority is embodied in Chapter 152 of the Laws of Minnesota for 1935. The BOARD is not a state agency. The Department of Administration transferred the title of the property to the BOARD OF GOVERNORS on November 2, 1985. The Camp was not ooerated in 1986 and 1987 due to restrictions placed upon the facility by the City of Orono. The expenses represented in these statements include materials and machinery necessary to commence compliance with the governmental ‘’ . J ”* Act further provides, 'the transfer must include all equipment and nonstate funds currently under control of the Commissioner Affairs and for use in connection with the Camp • SccolId!^g?y? th. iiat. transferred .29.400.93 to the BOARD OF GOVERNORS in 1986. MOTE B• MINNESOTA Department of Revenue recognized the organization as ■exempt" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 290.05, Subdivision 1. “elL^ihifi- The BOARD OF GOVERNORS - BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP r;rtrr“'""n::: ■r:h:i%*darr hr'frf pJJJi.'oT;.. on,, or:hni"u^n"Le^?Sn“;"Jh^ D^LhJ^d A”r!cai «;r Veteran., the Mintary Order T Heart and the Veterans of Foreign Wars provided that at least appointees are Vietnam Veterans# NOTE D•fif^^i--?fi;ar%rr'io:LnJ!srocJ^beJ'’?st°s^r:^";rse??:::ie: 30th each year. MOTE E * Othgr Funds- This report covers the Operating Fund. OF“^"gOVERNORS is also in char^'e of land, buildings and equipment which was transferred on November 1935. No representations of these items are included in this report. V » t NOTE Ft Volunteers- Since title to the property was transferred from the~State7 many hours of volunteer labor have been provided to assist in the clean-up and repair of the grounds and buildings at the Camp. Records of these donated services are not availablei however, they are reported as substantial by BOARD OF GOVERNORS members. NOTE C: Accounting_Changes_;_Statement_of_Cash_FJ.ows- Statement ot pTnancTal "Accounting Standards No. 95 (SFAS No. 95) "Statement of Cash Flows* was issued in November 1987. The statement requires that a statement of cash flows be presented rather than a statement of changes in financial position when issuing a complete set of finanical statements for annual periods ending after July 15, 1988. As allowed by SFAS No. 95 the Corporation has elected not to restate prior years financial statements. NOTE H: Wi thhoJ.ding_Tax_DeJ[j.nguencies- Federal Insurance Contributions and Federal withholding Taxes have not been remitted for the period January 1, to September 30, 1989. We have provided the proper accruals of Employer Tax Expense and Employees Tax Withheld. We have applied for waiver on any penalties on this deficiency based upon the death of the former Treasurer. We do not have any information at this time as to the decision by the Internal Revenue Service concerning this matter, nor have we calculated the interest due on the non-payments. As ot report date, all deliquent taxes have been paid. 1 2 I < cJ z < O i' • I I O 1 A o I i dOd NVld t lb vi^i: dr dil^c: •I r:i-oao I ^ I a M iiXV'i !vT« t-cc; ^^)l ■r ,• o 0 I ■■a ,\A4 a liQ,.. n IN'! \- \i. ( 'ji • I :P • I « *o Q - • ?•r • I *T •* •y • 1 ^ z- r' t>< T A/ • * i t » « I0. • I I W fv! V TO:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson /2. From: Date: Sub*^ect; Michael P, Gaffronr Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator April 11, 1990 #1520 Jerry & Diane Carlson, 3165 Casco Circle - Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-lC, Single family lakeshore residential, 1/2 acre Application - Request for hardcover, average setback, and lot coverage variances. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Proposed Site Plan Exhibit F - Proposed Garage Elevation Views Exhibit G - Staff Lot Coverge Calculation Exhibit H - Applicants' Hardcover Calculation with Staff Revision Pertinent Pacts - 1. Note that a permit has been issued for the addition on the east end of the house, which staff determined met the average setback, hardcover, and lot coverage requirements with the currently existing garage and no pool. The applicants were advised early on that while this addition could be approved absent the pool and new garage proposal, the pool and garage would definitely need hardcover and average setback variances which staff was certainly not in a position to guarantee could be obtained. 2. Existing hardcover on the property in the 0-75' zone is 4.4%, consisting of some concrete walks, platforms and a 100 square foot shed. In the 75-250' zone, existing hardcover including the addition under construction is approximately 23%. Proposed hardcover in the 75-250' zone is 5,739 square feet or 31% (5,889 s.f. or 31.9% if existing landscape rock/plastic is not removed). This excludes the water surface area of the pool, which staff has consistently excluded from hardcover calculations. 3.Construction of the pool and the patio surrounding the pool requires an average lakeshore setback variance. The pool and associated patio encroach 55' past the average lakeshore setback line, but do not encroach into the 0-75' setback area. Zoning Pile #1520 April 11, 1990 Page 2 of 3 4. Existing lot coverage on the property including the existing garage, existing house and new addition existing shed by the lake, and the existing wood deck (which is approximately 24"-36" above grade with 18" benches), is 3,436 square feet or 12.25%. Proposed lot coverage including the proposed garage, existing house with current addition, existing and proposed decks, and pool including both the pool structure and its patios, and the shed in the 0-75' zone, totals 4,898 square feet or 17.5%. Discussion - The proposed pool encroa-hes approximately 55* past the average lakeshore setback. Because this property is somewhat on a curve in the shoreline, the houses on either side do not face parallel with applicants' house, but face somewhat away from applicants' lakeshore yard. In that respect, the actual impact on lake views by the this pool may be rather minimal. Applicants have not specified what height fence (if any) is proposed to surround the pool. The hardcover increases on the property are due to a number of factors. First, the new garage is intended to be fully conforming in location and orientation. The existing garage is within 1' of the street lot line and cars leaving it back directly into the street. The new garage meets the required 10' side and street setbacks, and is side loading, with a new driveway area within the property containing adequate backup area to allow traffic to enter the street moving forward. Also, the other significant increase in hardcover is the patio surrounding the pool. The pool Itself is 640 square feet, with patio surrounding it amounting to 512 square feet. These patios are adjacent to the existing wood deck. Regarding lot coverage, existing lot coverage is within the 15% limit adopted in 1989. Based on the recently adopted lot coverage ordinance amendment that includes pools and their associated patios as lot coverage, certainly this pool and its patio are lot coverage. However, staff would question whether the wood decks, none of which extend to a height of 6', are to be considered within lot coverage for this property. If not, the total lot coverage is 14.8%. Zoning File #1520 April Ilf 1990 Page 3 of 3 Staff Recoamendation - The proposed new garage and driveway would appear to be positive additions to the property- and result in removal of a non-conforming garage. Staff would recommend approval of that new garage and driveway. Regarding the pool. Planning Commission should determine whether the proposed pool and any proposed fence around it will have a significant effect in reducing lake views currently enjoyed by neighboring properties. If not, an average lakeshore setback variance may be justified. The hardcover associated with the proposed pool patio is approximately 2.8%. Planning Commission may wish to consider whether removal of certain items of hardcover in the 0-75 zone might help justify granting the proposed hardcover increase. The only other obvious removals would be further mlnimalization of new sidewalks, or reducing the size of the existing wood deck or proposed pool patio areas. Finally, Planning Commission should determine based on the newly revised lot coverage ordinance, whether the existing wood deck should be counted under the lot coverage criteria. If so, you should determine whether there is justification for a variance to allow 17.5%. If the deck shouldn't be counted, then lot coverage will be 14.8% and a variance is not required. Summary of Issues to Address - 1. Hardcover; 0-75': remain at 4.4%, or require a decrease? 75-250'; allow existing 22.9% to increase to 31%? 2. Average lakeshore setback encroachment of 55'. 3. Lot coverage interpretation; if required, allow variance for increase to 17.5%? I Zoning File #1520 April II, 1990 Page 2 of 3 4.Existing lot coverage on the P'°Pf J^.^s^rb^thl ra'hyranrt\"i"lxrtYng “^"ooTat=h (Which square feet or 17e5%. Discussion - The oroDOsed pool encroaches approximately 55’ P^st the parallel with applicants' ^e”iVT.^e^hcr.\%' aT.rrs PP^/p^o^- ” surround the pool. The hardcover increases on the PP°P®’^']; T"llJ of factors. First, ‘he >ew garage is l' conforming in location . g„'a cars leaving it back ?ir^^"lT"info ^51 sV/eVt - - g^e mee« the regn^ired __10. dJfvewY/ ar%“ wUhlfth^e pVope%"ty containing a^qnate backup area t^allow traffic to enter the street moving forward. Also, the other significant inorease^ln^hardc^^^^^^^^^^ patio surrounding the pool. J ”J® P. to 512 square feet. These with patio surrounding it amounting to ^Uos are adjacent to the existing wood deck. Regarding lot coverage, existing lot ‘laopV'e^^^ l*ol15. limit adopted in I’M. Based on the rece„t^^^^^ ^p^ coverage ordinance amendment t^®^^^^"Vi_lv%his pool and its associated patios as Ir - f would question whetherpatio are lot coverage. How^ever^ staff wou g ^ fo*nsTde ‘^re^ll’lVhL“‘Tpt P-«agr/^^^^ P-P^rty. If not. the total lot coverage is 14.8%. i \ > \ OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION H5.CO Initial Application Feo ($50.00 per each additional varian^V Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address SUfjS’ CASCO CifiCLP •x n .•s'fTTV frC fionvnXdX t t \Ji ,FnJAi(CE OFFICE 1350200QOO cm- f 03/26/ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) _ _ Please check one - Property abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Phone (home) ■iEPPgRf Q Phone (work) Address ; 4^ City; Zip: 563^ ' OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) PJAfie. ;_ Phone (work)^egigr; Acidress; MABd-lggEACEGbCLgity; EOlklA-.MkI. zio; g;3s5ig>cr Date Property Acquired MOVfeMBEg - ________ (month/year) I t^#) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT DSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property ^ Residentiary Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ vAeiAfJc^ fee +WPccVEe.'Ai2EA=' Describe request in detail; |KJCLUt?)Kk^ rhOL. __________________ VARIANCES REQUIRED ___ Lot Area Lot Width Front Hardcover _ Side Rear)Setback Variances (______ Other Su)lMM)>s)(V, ftoi. uj/SUPGOUKOvkp Cfex ’AS2EA ----------------------------—--------------------------------- i'i 'SO I I :FPijM -rulOM TO nOt'PNE ClfVOF^- • ‘-'f cficr;o__Jjumssn^ ♦ r DSHIP o- -ractical difficulty resulting from strictnoceribe undue hardship a*le«eMni: of zoning ragulationz:_----------------------- _ ____________ -WAtr-^-e-KaO-' ccnoliano. with zoning Code Rec’uirements:------------------—--------------------------------- 301R2D SUBMITTALS completed ^PP-ication ^ owners within ISO' (you must cbcaxn =tSn1ist Vou"n\“ 4a.-«enz of Finanoa A-«3 Covn Canaar 348-3271). . (i'O) ore-addressed to each of the ^“:?*o"n 4VUo^VllaVl!;rno 5«orn-ada.-asa (use aifraaa iabeXs Obtained with ha-dcover calculations as required. Sr.r= l;^irUxi«VnViai -proposed aiev.,-.ion„ if any cnenges In%xiating grede^ Plat... ^ —- --- Additional items as ____-____________________________ ormation has not been _____________________________________________ —------------- -- *“ a.u-%^ VA^lance Aoplica'tion is ccrnplete.tification by Zoning Deparw.ment thaw _ Date_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ ling Official’s signature,_ _ _ _ _.- - - - --- - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - •LICANT'S signature ntovde all information required or » applicant hereby agrees ^tes to oav all fees -and/cr juested bv the Zoning a Jcal''*aticn,'and certifies that aualexpenees inca^/". bead of his/her »nt«. Commission.memoers, and council / A- ‘ on and verification^oc tnis ^/jC. Ar^ plieant ini-eVTirvVyiTJuoorco.x.^-.-^--.°du'i1 Vgn'sh:.^ 'V--||*“n«CiSo"c: ‘br: i?- So-^i::d’^:;:;/ehtend in -/our pTeVe- A^oH=/ • flee cf this chanv*t nrior to the mee.—ng. os K> N. M CL 0^ 5uioc z UJ i/i> (A M I (/) M SS2 Ui a UI ru Z Ma MsKl O o fOoo Xu A i Kl CMoo UJ Ch to K < «• 2 o ?“”2 O H ^ U CU lA flC X UJ Ui lA tt M 8 8 S < lA O X « M Z O MM X Kl M c/1 </) « U UJ Ui M M Kl O < < M U L- K- I 2 </1 (/)rs. < UI Ui ^ ^ - V sS O M M M lA c/1 (/) o u u »4 0 $ 01 a CA § s O C/1 < Ui So^ CDJ K* U CSJoo -i K o tAcuoo < K» X UJ Kl M ^ U C/1 C/1 o -I u LJ M M2 Z Z Kl M I K , •H O C/1 (/) S^55 <0 -i -I S Kl M Mo z z § SJ O Kl lA < UI !| K* >• S3 aoo X Kl M <4* U M Ul C/1 c/1 Kl O K* < M U M Mz r o> ^ -i O' S Kl UI < UI ►- CA CA I O (M UI CO *5< M M 5. f'. >SSSSS3 M M O O M ^ « Kl O Kl O X X Ui J3 so »«« Kl M > U X Kl O S K < M U lu H t ^ O Ui «U UI < st X M u CO Kl M Kl O Z M Ui O* X -1 Kl U.' U UI M X n fcr ^ °5 Ui o I- X UI N O 'O* > M M < Z Kl Z K M O O X Kl M U X h* CA1 Kl O M U I O M UI UI CA § M C^ Kl UI UI ^ — < to to to o «■ >. os«u UI N , UI > S M S Kl Oo Kloo Kl CA CA Kl Ui cvi K I Or'* o M < M Io ^i CO Klo CO O Kl O o o u M I »< Ui UI a M X UIz z o u u 2 c zog; K- u ^ 2 UI ^ Ui CM 0 ^ 9k X m 2 O Oaa u u H h- CA Oso Ui cAa 1 g Xu UJ § UJ ^ M K < »-‘Si K- <<to i»i mJ2 LJ ^ ^ U X g 3!SS UJ Ui Q X X S < X X <o u. Ui H O Xoo< 3X0 Z Ui < ao Xa >- X < ^ X N. X << z V • • •*? .- —: ... i WEST E levation * ^ 'a • • i f *33.2.3 C' f 03 ri+'C. ^ JO 2- U-i.*? <^M-~ .5es^5 3</5 4?/ ~ Z'2-.vs^ P^Pasi^ ^/oz. ?fo in 5'I2- lo'^o foou i^A^rro /Oi /5>oo ^Htt^ yA* O /■'' -i?. -‘~?^l' Hl'^1 ^^.y/ ZOo'17 ' lH‘ S X I HARDCOVER CALCULATION HQRjgHEET SZTZACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75"^75-250^ 250-300' 5G0-IQ0Q' Existing Hardcoves in Zone EXIST. A. H ouse I io35;g s.F. LENGTH 8.5* 14.5* APPmoKi 03' X X X X WIDTH i43‘l-2L(2)S.F. 14.3''2CTT.O S.F. ig(^S.F. 3. Garage 223x'24*‘ ^ l^.3x + l'x-1.3' c. Driveway 3Qy34.<gn!if 4x 1*2.3 :m5_s.F. D.. Sidewalk 4' Bosr. E. Patio / X X X X ilO 48'm S.F. S.F. S,F. S.F. S.F. 64- H&i ii.^-r'xS3H- 6.3*X5' F. Landscape AREAS o u»oe.L^.N 2 <Oo.W ■ PLASTIC SHEETING 'TOf^OF- ^&Ai)4HA6?___^ UAUS X X X SD 1£Q OO . S.F. , S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. G. Other 4fex^' Qo'x32 • tctxl » i4ate £. lOTAtf^RDCOVER IN ZcJnP^- 51*2.S.F. 5139 S.F. Total Property Area in Zone S.F.B m gi^q .ijT; is,43a > mn ■ 31 % ?SB81 i lavii i To:Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson /3^ From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:April 13, 1990 Subject: #1519 Fullerton Properties, SE Quadrant Willow Dr & County Rd 6 Intersection - Sketch Plan Review - No Public Hearing Required Zoning District - RR-lB Total Area * 36.8 acres, 5.8 acres wetlands, 31 acres dry Proposed plat of 13 lots Density Ratio * 1 unit per 2.3 acres dry buildable 1 Unit per 2.8 acres total area Pertinent Ordinance - Section 11.10, Subdivisions 6-8 - Sketch plan. List of Exhibits Exhibit Exhi.Llt Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit J A - Application Al- Applicant's Addendum B - Plat Map C - Soils Map D - Septic Inventory Map of Homestead El-2 - Ringerswood Plat Confirmation of OHM Dickey Lake F - 10' Contour Map of Area G - Phillips Subdivision North Side of Cty Rd 6 - Gaffron's Memo of 3/30/90 - Map of Surrounding Properties/Designation of Future Access Corridors - Sketch Plan H I Review of Application - The applicants propose the subdivision of the former homestead of Lewis Cox. The subdivision will be a plat of 13 rural lots served by a cul-de-sac road to be designated as a private road. Lot Configuration - All lots meet the required lot width to »*. rear of the front yard setback area of 50' except for Lets 6 and 10, Block 2 and Lot 3, Block 1. Lots 1, 2, 4 and 5 would be classified as through lots requiring conditional use permits for al’ accessory structures. Upon final determination of edge of wetlands, (Dickey Lake shorel'*,** at 985.5 elevations) all lots i long west side must contain ?. s of dry buildable land. Zoning Pile #1519 April 13, 1990 Page 2 of 3 Road/Future Access Corridor - The access location at Willow Drive appears to satisify the separation distance of 150' from the intersection of County Road 6 and Willow Drive. The road will be designated as an outlot and clarsified as a private road. The Engineer's report will ask for Gxtiension outlets to County Road 6 and to the south^ lot line (review Exhibit I). Extension to the south will provide future access to the potential subdivision of the southern property at potential 2-3 lot division. The north extension corridor will retain the City's option for a future loop road. Please review Exhibit A-1, applicant asks for special consideration for a ful- de-sac designed road to minimize impact of heavily trafficed County Road 6 and preserve the aesthetics of lots that abut County Road 6. Septic - Please review Exhibit H, Gaffron cautions^ that Lots 6 through 9, Block 2 are questionable. He also cautions that Lots 7 and 10 may not have correct wetland designation. He confirms that the lots along the west half of the property and the north should find suitable area for on-site septic systems. Wetlands/Drainaqe - Review Exhibit C, Applicants' grading and drainage plans at the time of preliminary subdivision must show how they plan to control drainageways coming from west and north and impact on potential residential and septic development. Drainageways should be realigned along shared lot lines. City Engineer will determine required width of drainage easements. Dickey Lake is designated at the 985.5' elevation. There is a Peaty muck (PA) wetland area that surrounds Dickey Lake and must be designated as a drainage easement. Dickey Lake should be designated on the final plat as an open water lake area. It would be helpful for the applicant if a City representative upon a site inspection designated the extent of the wetland areas that surround the lakebed. Planning Commission members may have other concerns issues that they would liJce the applicants to address in the formal subdivision application. Directives to Applicants in Preparing for Prellisinary Subdivision 1.All lots must be confirmed as maintaining the 2 acre dry ^IS^\dth'af tL^SO'^'front y??d setback line. Zoning File #1519 April 13, 1990 Page 3 of 3 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Lots 1, 2, 4 5 fo?“il"accesslry'^structures. The 5Sad^Vs°"ti bTdIliSnated as outlet. Per City Engineer's Report provide future corridors to south and north. Dickey lake elevation to be shown at "®’'ers'’e*inl ”“. Lrrounding lake to be J^own^as^ a^ d«rnage ^ wetlands t!?hin°"“s I'and 10. JPf J,««/e lTa£fVon°7n ^d%term\“nl‘n^ rititl“e° «e%^°lo%^epfio ”sft*es on each proposed lot. preliminary grading and north, easements shared lot line. Provide Drainageways to be be redirected and conveyed ?h%%\. Pro^erty^^^ The outlet that ^rYve'’Vhril'be'd«igna\t ‘^^ south of the entrance at would recommend that the exception be^included within the plat and the total property Shown as one lot included within the plat. applicants shou Vos.c««%“lo?- Lot*! buildings/accessory building referenced as a barn a«s’'not “le!°tSe required 75' setback t.on thejout i‘L*;tea"d^*sh:ri‘b? c*l*os%*d* a^d^rcfeL achieved via the interior plat road. I J /?<7 CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address willow Dr. and county Rd. No. 6 -'’i Property Identification Nurober (P.I.D.) 27-118-23-32-0007 Please check one - Property ^ abstract or ___ torrens? Attach legal description to application. CITY OF DRQIQ FimCE OFFICE 135C200QOO If 01 p 150.01} l MK ■ JL 150.00 FECEIPT-Wm YOU ffl72i30 cool r<01^Q^9.^ APPLICANT Pnone (home) 421-4420 Name Fuiierton Properties, Inc. J. W. Pranks Phone (work) 339-9611 Address: 608 2nd Rve. So., tnioo City: Minneapolis, HN Zip; 55402 Phone (home) ___OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Cox Brothers Fara, Jim Cox Phone (work) 473-9624 Address: 1020 W. willow Drive (attach list if more than one) City; Long Lk., MN Zip; 55356______ EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size 31.0 5.3 36.8 Present Use (check)AG. Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Zoning District ag. PROPOSAL v 'jjon for Tax Purposes X A,ine Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use4 (check) L 13_ 13 2 acre Existing Units New Units Total Units Units per ?? Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ NIMINOM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1, Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 2. 3. 4. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature Date 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title o^jinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FEES X Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II fi III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) $150.00 250.00 250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) 300.00 + 20.00/Lot Pinal Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature J. Owner's Signature Date 3/23/90 Franks, Vi :e President, Fullerton Properties , Tnc. Date ^ Applicant must hav^ all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant 5s unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ! puiumn Properties, Inc, Mailing Address: P. 0. Box 30 Minneapolis, MN 55440*0030 608 2nd Ave. So., Suite 1100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402»1937 (612) 339*9611 March 23, 1990 c.f •1 \\ I •• City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Jeznne A. Mabusth, Building s Zoning Administrator Dear Jeanne: Enclosed is our application and fee to start the subdivision process for the Cox property . ffe look forward to the same pleasant association we had with the City on the previous subdivision. We are proposing a 13 lot subdivision which we believe meets all city requirements. In examining the road system which affects the overall layout of the subdivision, we considered several alternatives. Our initial layouts all utilized County Road 6 but considering the esthetics of the subdivision and the traffic volume on County Road 6 we are proposing only one outlet onto Willow. We hope that you will agree that this particular piece of property , like so many in Orono, deserves to have the beauty preserved as best we can. We believe this layout contributes to that goal. We look forward to your comments and will be happy to answer any questions that arise. Vice President enclosures LJ Ul q: 3 O (r |||>lp X Z w •• •» 0 < ATE LIMIT r 'TrinityfSSU *ry^i3 kh-7 —, / ,< (( ■I'fe yj > /--------X ^> 0 -N\ : Pv . 1 . •C\\\. n N- rrHERN ^.sT-y 1021 » • r^. r '.:*'\c -■'7/ mm* % \:> J •'Long (BM j981)-^'j:^_y \ • « ‘f V ;-j ■ •■xCITY OfH v:K/:r:.-r • ••b • V • I ^ ^ ail .LONG ..LAKE-’..........:ii: ).'i y .1 4 limit . r / ^xM0 Mfi . -in 4- * i ^ ' II // I i \ V' y // ' r ' ' V y ^ ■•--■ '■ ■.:: A-'^ L_V^ A / S, -**f i-' I:v. 5 ■■'•= V» ^ V »'f \ \ -'I'Oi 1 h (T' IV. . ■ . * • • To: From: Date: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator March 30, 1990 Subject: #1519 Fullerton Properties - Willow Drive/County Rd 6 Sketch Plan - Septic Concerns I have transferred the soil survey information to a copy of the proposed plat, and would make the following preliminary comments for sketch plan review; 1. Soils on the west half of the site are mainly LeSueur loam, slopes generally 6% or less and water table generally no higher than 3' below the surface. The lots designated as Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, and Lots 1 and 2 of Block 2, have substantial areas of LeSueur loam and probably will find suitable sites for mound systems. 2. Lots 3 and 4, Block 2 contain areas of Kilkenny and Lester clay loam soils which generally are a little heavier clay soils. Again, these lots would probably require mound systems and both appear to have some area of acceptable slopes. 3. The existing farmstead in Lot 5, Block 2 (2225 Sixth Avenue North) has one 1,000 gallon pre-cast concrete tank west of the farm house, and drainfield that is unknown. Notwithstanding concerns about drainage through the west end of this lot, there may be suitable expansion sites west of the house. The higher ground on which most of the buildings are located is a Hayden clay loam, often requiring mound systems due to slow perc rate, with the areas west of the house appearing to be a Glencoe silty clay loam which often precludes the use of any system. 4. Lots 6, 7, 8 and 9 of Block 2 contain substantial areas of Glencoe soil which often has water table at the surface during the wet season. Lots 6 and 7 would appear to have a drainageway from the north bisecting these lots into a front and rear portion. Lot 6 may have some mound sites on the fringes of the Glencoe at the front or rear of the lot. Lot 7 will have an extremely difficult time trying to find drainfield sites that are more than 75' from the designated wetland area. Lots 8 and 9 are also quite low, containing mostly wet soils. These two lots might find suitable mound sites near the road, probably ending up in front yard areas. Both Lots 8 and 9 have a number of drainage concerns, as they are the receiving area for overland flows from the west. ' - - Septic ConcernsZoning File #1519 March 30, 1990 Page 2 of 2 5 Lot 10 has a little bit of everything, including flat, wU soils, steep slope soils, and high ground to the west. It may be possible to find sites either just above or just below the steep sloped Lester clay loam area. Sunmary - The proposed lots in the west half and northern tier of this proposal probably will have suitable drainfield J through 9 are very questionable due to mostly wet soils and drainageways. I have compiled the available soils information, topography, and wetlands map into an overlay drawing for your proposed Lot 7, the designated wetxands e fo? extensive than shown by the surveyor. The same holds true for Lot 10. On paper Lots 7, 8 and 9 look pretty questionable. Perhaps a site iMpection will help to confirm whether these concerns are valid.