The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10-28-22 Septic Compliance Inspectioninspection MINNESOTA POLLUTION Compliance I CONTROL AGENCY p p tion report form 520 Lafayette Road North Existing Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 Doc Type: Compliance and Enforcement Instructions: Inspection results based on Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) requirements and attached supporting documentation — additional local requirements may also apply. Further information can be found here: https://vwvw.pca.state mn us/sites/default/files/wa-wwists4-31a pdf. Inspector must submit completed form to Local Governmental Unit (LGU) and system owner within 15 days of final determination of compliance or noncompliance. Property information Local tracking number: Parcel ID# or Sec/Twp/Range: 28-118-23-32-0007 Local regulatory authority: City of Orono Property address: 3105 6` Ave North, Orono MN 55356 Owner/representative: Ryan Klug Owner's phone: Brief system description: Pre -cast Septic tanks pump tank and Above grade Drainfield Sized for 600 gpd System status System status on date (mm/dd/yyyy): 10/28/2022 ® Compliant — Certificate of compliance* (Valid for 3 years from report date unless evidence of an imminent threat to public health or safety requiring removal and abatement under section 145A.04, subdivision 8 is discovered or a shorter time frame exists in Local Ordinance.) *Note: Compliance indicates conformance with Minn. R. 7080.1500 as of system status date above and does not guarantee future performance. ❑ Noncompliant —Notice of noncompliance An imminent threat to public health and safety (ITPHS) must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance or under section 145A. 04 subdivision 8. Systems failing to protect ground water must be upgraded, replaced, or use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance. Reason(s) for noncompliance (check all applicable) ❑ Impact on public health (Compliance component #1) — Imminent threat to public health and safety ❑ Tank integrity (Compliance component #2) — Failing to protect groundwater ❑ Other Compliance Conditions (Compliance component #3) — Imminent threat to public health and safety ❑ Other Compliance Conditions (Compliance component #3) — Failing to protect groundwater ❑ System not abandoned according to Minn. R. 7080.2500 (Compliance component #3) — Failing to protect groundwater ❑ Soil separation (Compliance component #5) — Failing to protect groundwater ❑ Operating permit/monitoring plan requirements (Compliance component #4) — Noncompliant - local ordinance applies Comments or recommendations (2) 1000 gallon pre -cast septic tanks (house), (1) 1000 gallon pre -cast pump tank, and a 10 x 50 foot rockbed above grade Drainfield. Pump tanks every 3 years. RISER ON PUMP TANK IS CRACKED AND SHOULD BE REPLACED. Certification I hereby certify that all the necessary information has been gathered to determine the compliance status of this system. No determination of future system performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system construction, possible abuse of the system, inadequate maintenance, or future water usage. By typing my name below, I certify the above statements to be true and correct, to the best of my knowledge, and that this information can be used for the purpose of rocessing this form. Business name: Chi 's tic S Certification number: 4761 Inspector signature: - License number: 2064 (This document has been electronically signed) Phone: 952-200-3176 Necessary or locally required supporting documentation (must be attached) ® Soil observation logs ❑ Locally required forms ❑ Tank Integrity Assessment Operating Permit ❑ Other information (list): https://www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 Use your preferred relay service Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4-31b • 1/11/21 Page I of 4 1. Impact on public health — Compliance component #1 of 5 criteria: System discharges sewage to theI ❑ Yes* ® No ground surface Attached supporting documentation: ❑ Other: --__ ® Not applicable System discharges sewage to drain ❑ Yes* ® No tile or surface waters. _ System causes sewage backup into ❑ Yes* ® No dwelling or establishment. Any "yes" answer above indicates the system is an imminent threat to public health and safety, Describe verification methods and results: ran pump to determine hydrolic loading of drainfield. No issues were observed at the time of inspection.I 2. Tank integrity — Compliance component #2 of 5 Compliance criteria: System consists of a seepage pit, ❑ Yes* ® No cesspool, drywell, leaching pit, or other pit? Sewage tank(s) leak below their ❑ Yes* ® No designed operating depth? If yes, which sewage tank leaks I Any "yes" answer above indicates the system is failing to protect groundwater. Attached supporting documentation: ® Pumped at time of inspection Chip's Septic Name of maintenance business: Sevices License number of maintenance business: 2064 Date of maintenance: 10/28/2022 ❑ Existing tank integrity assessment (Attach) Date of maintenance _ _ (mm/dd/yyyy): (must be within three years) (See form instructions to ensure assessment complies with Minn. R. 7082.0700 subp. 4 B (1)) ❑ Tank is Noncompliant (pumping not necessary - explain below) ❑ Other: Describe verification methods and results: Tanks were camera inspected. Pump tanks every 3 years. Riser on pump tank is cracked and should be fixed https://www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 Use your preferred relay service Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4-31b • 1/11/21 Page 2 of 4 I Other compliance conditions — Compliance component #3 of 5 3a. Maintenance hole covers appear to be structurally unsound (damaged, cracked, etc.), or unsecured? ❑ Yes* ® No ❑ Unknown 3b. Other issues (electrical hazards, etc.) to immediately and adversely impact public health or safety? ❑ Yes' ® No ❑ Unknown *Yes to 3a or 3b - System is an imminent threat to public health and safety. 3c. System is non -protective of ground water for other conditions as determined by inspector? 3d. System not abandoned in accordance with Minn. R. 7080.2500? *Yes to 3c or 3d - System is failing to protect groundwater. Describe verification methods and results: Visual Attached supporting documentation: ❑ Not applicable ❑ Yes* ® No ❑ Yes* ® No 4. Operating permit and nitrogen BMP* — Compliance component #4 of 5 ® Not applicable Is the system operated under an Operating Permit? ❑ Yes ® No If "yes", A below is required Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP specified in the system design? ❑ Yes ® No If "yes", B below is required BMP = Best Management Practice(s) specified in the system design If the answer to both questions is "no", this section does not need to be completed. Compliance criteria: a. Have the operating permit requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. Is the required nitrogen BMP in place and properly functioning? ❑ Yes ❑ No Any "no" answer indicates noncompliance. Describe verification methods and results: Attached supporting documentation: ❑ Operating permit (Attach) ❑ https://www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 Use your preferred relayservice Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4-31b • 1/11/21 Page 3 of 4 5. Soil separation — Compliance component #5 of 5 Date of installation 11/9/1990 ❑ Unknown (mm/ddtyyyy) Shorel and/Wei I head protection/Food ® Yes ❑ No beverage lodging? Compliance criteria (select one): 5a. For systems built prior to April 1, 1996, and not located in Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Area or not serving a food, beverage or lodging establishment: Drainfield has at least a two -foot vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock. 5b. Non-performance systems built April 1, 1996, or later or for non-performance systems located in Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Areas or serving a food, beverage, or lodging establishment: Drainfield has a three-foot vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock.* ❑ Yes ❑ No* Attached supporting documentation: ❑ Soil observation logs completed for the report (Attach) ® Two previous verifications of required vertical separation (Attach) ❑ Not applicable (No soil treatment area) ❑ 12 inches of sand under Rockbed ® Yes [:]No* Indicate depths or elevations 5c. 'Experimental" "Other-, or "Performance' ❑ Yes ❑ No* systems built under pre -2008 Rules; Type /V or V systems built under 2008 Rules 7080. 2350 or 7080.2400 (Advanced Inspector License required) Drainfield meets the designed vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock *Any "no" answer above indicates the system is failing to protect groundwater. Describe verification methods and results: Used soil probe, and tile probe to complete soil borings. A. Bottom of distribution media 12 inches of sand B. Periodical!y saturated soil/bedrock 20 inches C. System separation 32 inches D. Required compliance separation* 31 inches *May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by Local Ordinance. Upgrade requirements: (Minn. Stat. § 115.55) An imminent threat to public health and safety (ITPHS) must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance. If the system is failing to protect ground water, the system must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance. If an existing system is not failing as defined in law, and has at least two feet of design soil separation, then the system need not be upgraded, repaired, replaced, or its use discontinued, notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more strict. This provision does not apply to systems in shoreland areas, Wellhead Protection Areas, or those used in connection with food, beverage, and lodging establishments as defined in law. https://www.pca.state.mn.us wq-wwists4-31b • 1/11/21 • 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 Use your preferred relay service Available in alternative formats Page 4 of 4 Go 6 L -!o this work -'as completed in accoi-dance with MN 7080 and any local reqs, Designer Signature Company License # Soil Lo # � "Boring Li Pit Elevation !t9 Depth (in) Textu -e fi•agment % matrix color redox Depth to SHWT color consistence grade shape <35 loose loose (' /(,8 35-50 >50 / friable firm weak single grain granular blocky �• moderate prismatic platy rigid strong massive <35 Ioose loose 35-50 �� liable weak single grain granular blocky t d- >50 moderate prismatic platy rigid strong b massive <35 loose loose �� ✓ 2 7(/ 35-50 >50 friable firm weak ngle grain anular blocky Iniassive moderateismatic platy rigid strong b <35 35 - 50�iw�z ,"a loose friable loose single grain >50 firm weak granular bloclry moderate prismatic platy rigid strong massive <35 loose loose 35-50 friable weak single grain granular blocky >50 firm moderate prismatic platy rigid strong massive - Soil Lo M �-- Q!Boring pit Elevation Depth to SHWT Depth (in) Textur fi-agment % matrix color — redox color consistence grade shape <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 fi-iable weak granular blocky >50 J fnn moderate prismatic platy E rigid strong massive <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granular bloclry 16 •-1 � � � ( >50 � firm moderate prismatic platy rigid strong massive <35 loose loose single grain �• 35-50 >50 friable firm weak granular blocky moderate prismatic rigid strong massive ... _ ._.. <35 _ .. — -v loose - — --- loose ----- single-grain- ingle_grain_ 35-50 35 - 50 elf friable weak - granular blocky >50 firm moderate prismatic platy rigid strong massive <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granular blocky >50 firm moderate prismatic platy rigid strong massive this work -'as completed in accoi-dance with MN 7080 and any local reqs, Designer Signature Company License #