Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-21-1986 Planning PacketPLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY , JANUARY 21, 1986 7 : 3 4 P.M* 1275 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - Tim Adams ATTENDANCE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:30 P.M. #1003 Hans G. Weiler & Don Kempf 1125 & 1135 North Arm Drive Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement 2. 7:45 P.M. #1004 William Ulrich 1535 & 1595 Bohn's Point Road Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement INFORMATION ITEM 3. 8:30 P.M. Suburban Hennepin Regional Park Disrict - Marty Jessen - Noerenberg Park Plan ACTION ITEMS 4. #967 & #968 John B. Idstrom, 2580 Fox Street Preliminary Subdivision & Conditional Use Permit - Continuation of Public Hearing 5. Zoning Amendment - Continuation of Public Hearing ADDITIONAL ITEMS 6. Planning Commission approval of December 1.6 , 1985 Minutes. 7. Planning Comnussion to select a representative to attend the February 1.0, 1986 Council Meeting. ADJOURNMENT NOTE: Due to lack of a quorum by the Planning Commission (4 members) this meeting was cancelled acid action wi 1 1 be taken on the above items at the February 18, i986 Planning Commission members. Members Present: Callahan, Rovegno, and Taylor. Members Absent.: Kelley, McDonald, Goetten, and Sime. City staff Present: Zoning Administrator Mabusth and City Recorder Peterson. PLANNING CaOMMISSION rulINTING TUESDAY, JANUARY 211 1986 7 : 3 0 P.M. 1275 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - Tim Adams ATTMWANCE SCHE U1, PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:30 P.M. #1003 Hans G. Weiler & Don Kempf 1125 & 1135 North Arm Drive Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement 2., 7:45 P.M. #1004 William Ulrich 1535 & 1595 Bohn's Point Road Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement INFORMATION ITEM 3. 8:30 P.M. Suburban Hennepin Regional Park Disrict - Marty Jressen - Noerenberg Park Plan ACTION ITEMS 4. #967 & #968 ichn B. Idstrom, 2580 Fox Street Pr� 1 imi nary Subdivision & Conditional. Use Permit - Con;:inuation of Public Hearing 5. Zoning Amendment - Continuation Public Hearing ADDITIONAL ITEMS 6. Planning Commissin:n approval of December 16, 1985 Minutes. 7. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the February 10, 1986 Council Meeting. FA 1. 1�: �l.l�i• Y NOTE: Due to lack of a quorum by the Planning Commission (4 members) this meeting was cancelled and action will be taken on the above items at the February 18, 1986 Planning Commission members. Members Present: Callahan, Rovegno, and Taylor. Members Absent.: Kelley, McDonald, Goetten, and Sime. City staff Present: Zoninq Administrator Mabusth and City Recorder Peterson. ��il �.1! � �`� 4`�`_;• � � � •�. ���, • i r+ .Nap � s—, � ` •"• � �.�-- f r �•r �1 RIVA ftook KY" ' dl�• w r • • ��•• •�� • �• • farms• A. 1 •.f ud" laps Is \ lrM. ••r •w MEOINA som� SOUND, mows a ONNNUO i SOUND • •memns • • • 1 • � • r I��•�• •�.� •L Came is y / ` to .►• •/ 1 • City of Orono, Minnesota w t" fap-• M i K� vw h iI i s ^ north %WUTA tii•e Key a WAG ASSMIMES NC. To: From: Date: Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, January 14, 1986 Zoning Administrator Subject: #1003 Hans G. Weiler, 1135 North Arm Drive - Lot Line Rearrangement Zoning District - LR-1B Total Area = 61,491 s.f. (excluding area of Lot 6) Lot 6 = 11,200 s.f. approximately 7 2, 6 91 s.f. Total Area Areas of Residential Units After Subdivision Weiler Parcels B & C = 35,226 s.f. Kempf Parcel A = 26,265 s.f. Application - Subdivision lot line rearrangement of platted properties. Applicant Weiler was granted subdivision approval on July 10, 1972 for the same lot line rearrangement a n order to build new house at 1125 North Arm Drive - See Exhibit E & G. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Planning Commission Minutes of 7/5/72 Exhibit E - Council Minutes of 7/10/72 Exhibit F - Buildi:g Permit For Garage - 1135 North Arm Drive Exhibit G - Building Permit For New Residence - 1125 North Arm Drive Exhibit H - Plat Map Designating Ownership Exhibit I - Survey of Lot Line Rearrangement Weiler owned Lots 6, 20-23 & 30-33 of the Skarp & Lindquist's Fernhi l l plat. In 1972 he applied for a lot line rearrangement in order to build a new residence on Lots 22 & 23. The survey for that subdivision revealed that Weiler's residence encroached into Lot 22 and a lot line rearrangement was also required. Note that a si. bdi vi sion review was required in that day because the lots did not satisfy lot area and width standards (43,560 s.f. in area and 140 feet of lot width. The house on Lots 22 & 23 and Lots In the process of filing deeds etc. it (Weiler's homestead) encroached Lot Weiler. The subdivision, as approved filed. A house was built on Lot 22 and F) based on a subdivision approval that 30 & 31 has been sold to Don Kempf. was noted that the house on Lot 21 22 creating finance problems for by Council in 1972, had never been a now garage on Loot 2 ( see Exhibit created the new dividing line. Staff sees no problem with granting subdivision approval of the lot line rearrangement subject to appropriate combination of remaining parcels as final approved building Cites (per Council recommendation of 1972). Zoning File #1003 January 14, 1986 Page 2 Staff asks that you consider the condition of 172 that also asked for an open space easement over Lot 6. In the Planning Commission minutes of 7/5/72, it is noted that applicant uses Lot 6 for lake access only. It is not clear in the minutes of '72 if the open space easement was required as a credit for the substandard areas of rearranged lots or to formally define the lot as unbui.ldable and recognize riparian use of lot. Staff would suggest that the directive of 172 be upheld by requiring an open space easement over Lot 6 and that applicant file a special lot combination that would formally recognize the riparian rights of Weiler. Staff Recommendation To approve the lot line rearrangement subdivision application of H. Weiler and D. Kempf based on the following findings. 1. All structures meet required setbacks. from newly defined shared lot line. 2. Council granted ,approval of proposed division in 1972. 3. Current division is required to bring existing structures into conformance with code. Approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Kempf to combine Lots 23, 30 and rearranged 22 & 31. 2. Weiler to combine Lots 20, 21, 32, 33 with Parcel C. 3. City to ask for open space easement over Lot 6 because of sub- standard building sites. 4. Weiler to execute special lot combination with City formally approving riparian use of Lot 6 by Weiler and recognizing special ownership relationship (Lot 6 cannot be sold as separate parcel. CITY OF ORONO SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM Uat-e 13y Fee ec' d ESQ ' w — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - APPLICANT Name '� Telephone '� ^ ; .L �I Mailing Addres'•. Name u; t 1) 14 W P fi, ? ' Telephone q Mailing Address /I ��► �-{ �` M< <� ',Z, (Attach list if more than one) — — � ---� — — — — — — — — ---------------- —w — --- �. .�-------------------�. PROPERTY LOCATION Street Address Proper-L.y Identification No. (P. I . D.) f, 7 -- /17 -- .)- /Y f Complete Legal Description to be attached to application ------------------------------------------------------------------------- EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels � Development Size Present Use (check) Present Zoning District _ f c v: arm •. , �' , � r ADr nd Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify) dam------ — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — — -- —— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — _ — — — -- — — — -- —— — — — — — — --_----- PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Existing Units New Units Total Units Units per Acres Square Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---- (nVER ) i4INIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 6000010'0 Application pp at c _ion Completed 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. �. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 4 . Stamped, legal sized envelopes (# 10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. P Pp.�. ..ark fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. S' ' ficate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 30 i 49 .. } i ., 5. De4WLLQ&ers A reement and acce t_ab_le form of security, Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat"�Ap-ration is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date - -. - -. - - - - � • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -. - - - - - - - -ram - - - - � - - - - - - - - r . ----------- FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) $150.00 ) so Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivisions) $250 , 00 Preliminary Review $300.00 plus (Class III and all non-residential) 20.00/lot Final Plat Review (Class III) $150.00* *(Plus any ------------__----------------------------------------------------------- legal or engineering charges) --- Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. ---------.-------------------------------------_--------------r_____------- -- Applicant's Signature -' ;•.J,,�_ � � Date L. Owner's Signature �_ _Da t � � •� -_ � Applicant must have�11 submit-; is lritn th Ci y offices 25 dziys before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are usually hold on the third Monday of each month. be lent the is 'te . .red ring •ees the 3 on • a • vt'sw i i , A j 1 dw 7 D'o' I w p*. InN _ 14 �C PI 04 0 ' St'�h f►zzcs� r'�o ..ivy 1 .,,o T• ••J �4 Vr V to e n Itor r, .ate J O\ _ r Q • �. a- • IL•4 t � Cy l so, X T�� -4 O 13 --1 O --1 O �] --I O m Z O 2- .< .. O i> x O T� x U -i -0 rn 3vrn� 3vrn'U 3Mm"v m-p n •. I?ID 71 rnb� m > M rnaA rnYm _ N -,. Arn'LO yr*Ii0 Drn2c7 arnZc7 0 t7�%00 O 3xJ C7aObo C7�b0 C7�T-O OMDO OMAO Cl M Cl 3X3 V z;a o rn ;a in m X0 m ;a in X7 rn -C " V mow Ow O►-•-1-i0 W GIC)Cow W 0W C�Cm� C�lJ1f'�C�t-�� OOOQ*P.- C0:43M00 OOOM OOOf� co or CD.._wxxkn Z.-. o d Q•no c� r-ywc o i-X.-o c13`roo�o 0>X 0 0~>X o mr►t v rn;a ;a V rnN V rxZ v rnN v mN V �3C00 m r rn OHr i, 0 Dbr-%4 i! C: n -' i V)W0-4 r a7CV 0r 7-4 OSS 1 OA 3 1 r00- i O> 1 023* 1 I.no m..r3 via nm IV NI0a >m 0C N ln0C M ut E o w W (n (n o w r- o w vIZ rn rn w ul r- w vI r- w WA wD O ZZr wD W> < Z Q. < D (A N H ►r < P.- o► < �-' 0. < O -{ --1 < O (A < o D o W o (n O rno m0 l,.i rno m o 0 0 0 W 03 W �ti: D rl rn v O�f'1t,7 W 3•rrn0ow 5• =zaw zC700 w rnrnow w m F-1 -4 0) O ►-- x7 0 '.- 0 A O 0 0) C) o r- i- 0 0o C�IaC-►.' C WZZ* <X "'f1• (,ONHO Oo0Re v 2r-C-1 o0 el. ZIJIVnNw t D -G0�VNo -W►-•C OO rr o O m_.0.-o o VO vIrc., o 0 500 ax o rn O V m 0 V Za)0 -4 Mo•0 y rMCo V rnV) V �-miTD �= z:x r ��z ti m mm .I.. Ornrn t Zrn> .�- Y�d -4 0>"rrn- 1 SHHt" -47r-0 v Al n V 07cr �1 30 1 cm--I�i t r-r'; 1 vi-n 1 r-oO:L t OD 1 VI O N VI O N 4A T> m m;_ N 3 N (Ji H 2+ D D rJ IJ1 a C N �� vltnorn w vI U ow VI73%JMOw M w to r w w w>f)M0 V,:9 p lrI m tA0""r- wA �O *r a% < 7C -4 O ►+ Ob r11 O ►-• V I ►+ o` D m rn H_ .-� o` < f-• Njowe r3 o r r<o P� rD-<o rev o rDN(Aa O rn O rn 0 0 { m Cl rA O N M4 • A dr r4 N «- -4 Y Wb �O O� 1? D < F N O r m i N �o �Q70 w 3♦-CCItnow 3►-G)M w ow a_ow 0�---�-1 w o C VC:c- CvaC� Q►V� ►-•rN►r0 Oo mCD �000• n_ �rnm o d mrnCo A H(noo O %no c3 aye o V rn V m m ^f C O ;> O v m .4 Z 1 r-M0 1 �� 1 d�ir 1 "pO. 1 fir' ?C Orr-+ V Orrr-4 =rmifm� v 0G) 0 V DNrn��v O:tr y oo 1 000� 1 -4-4 1 >rn r"M I r-C30 V70!'1 N On00r)A N VIDOO N r D-1 N W A3MarV VIOC N VI 7C w VI 7zn0W 0X7 w rnH3bXw VI'''mM W VI r W wn rn w> o w: rn N r (A r �aA Q` < -� �-' !T < f' r --I ♦+ 'n r -1 a �+ o% Y Ln n N .-• Q` < .-• r r rrn A� s.% > r-rn0 3r 4> o-4ar �m w o <o 0 0 m o o C) o -- r )IIo v N o o v LA w W <- w W m h+ �JI .1 r.w m v m ow- r� v O% C3 w S rn Z m v N Z m im 1 `1 0 .I I -1 O 10 -4 0 17 m m T_ 1- ;u 1}" z > D- x] A r-x7 b D DX O D1< -0 X-x:t0 T�X20 DXz0 YY. O -� S `C -u r tl :: ii r l -U ^: -u rn 'U 3 -v nt v :c 'v rn -0 3 'O m 'D f1 myao rn>aD m > m rnD;u rn;u m > M 2 O -< A � -< A %% -C 1�Drra DrnmZ0 Drnz0 rnZ0 rnz0 mzznn O -D-1 O M> 0 o V 3 0 y 0 O M> v 0 M> 0 v m A v o m �i) V 3;o O �M O :1M N ;u rn rn in M rn i7 rn M rn .• M :L►- -OOop O~.C..Low 3�MMOW Co0S W CD0SOW 3�'MM0W P tp O►-•p �00> p 00> CD OP- HH►•W TrN},E►+ C'OU1Q+P t'LnP.-> -- <X:.: Z IX:�Z Lnr7n -- Co (oontmO• Z.o0 •0 7_.- Ln > vU) b ANN W- AWr-rroo O 0rrt•0o O 7C7Z►- cl :o47r c �]tnr- lT�o C3YAWo Av`irr- 4 ?m-iS v Z C C V �7�T00 -4 �70�OG7 -4 rnmM V N 2ZSL r 3�3NIN 1 r� T I rn 1 3r00 1 M0)o0V OM<ry M rnp V 3H v :X f-4 0-4 0>>r-V D>;o 1 -, rn_ r 3 -4 ;a 1 'Or- 1 `t7r�-V 1 O33 : mrr--4N Ll m-<�ry to b-1N -11rn N rnrn - ri lnamr" N viMr-F- W p W ii � rSW � M W �ZW M NNC w ul r)73 M D 0.- � C7 �-• 0 D ♦- to m r-• Vui m :> ►•• P < 2 :G 0 r• tyM 3 n 3 %0 > •o v3 ��'MMjoi-r c� o < o o ry r o ry f- o ..� --� < o r a n rn o 0 0 0 0 0 , m o rn -u o• to V w p �� •; h w N .p r4 2 rn m H n d 3�a)ClC ZZOe✓r Z>✓22 W ZCo0=0W 3«+SS W M O D 0 >> 0 0 •- d L) ►-• > A p Y O O> ►• p p ;o ---111 Crv33 0%MM Cwzz <XZC- o-c Z ,-� rn m ,O -[ -< O� •0 3 V T vt to to L A N N to (1) U) "U o ON o CCV�� Noo :>Z,00 d o z�t,�r- umM M V zRom V ''..Z V Z00 -4 C) V zin0 V M-M .t r- 0 0 1 33 "� C:)m i 3 O 1 rn 1 S o t -1 O C)lulu v 3U) 0-4 SZ7c0 V SHH V 2 3."O V HH V 0M 0r- " 1 )---1:0 1 ><:J 1 rr r 13rM 1 rr- 1 �•C tJ1C71-1H N Vi0r-0-1N rnA;:_'Ty-irV Ln>m rn N mrn-iN t."D rn N rn to Z W vi:9H :LW ail.'Jg32w 0A:0M tr: M=W tlm;oi7 W rn Wb--4 w rirn w3-< w3 to w3 ;aH 0% < m rn w C• --4 vi 4%m�M OPr a)>m44 �0M M rO -1 � W �;o i 0 � r N-Zn rn r- :C %J 0 3 D .0 D 3 %o A r- 0 C) 00 <A p � r oo N rvo r o U)i3 w o 0 m y< ,° 0 to M O 2 11f N rn Z 3r+MM0 W -4 -4 O W (AL4MM liJ i►r-.2 W Zr"0Z W 3►•'=S0W oN1-4 CO 0a.1-4F-♦►..c) 2-1r1HH p 0 > CD a007- C) 0►-ab•-0) zL4M0 Clt: 2 <iC:�Z CwZZ� ` OAS r 000� -1 SS '"tT1U)ul D DN v16i:NW zDCaalb O -1--� 0o DODb a t� C31 Lnr- O 6 w0 Ni ij '�0 it cpGvo 1,UZG)GI rnc�vr7 v 3aTA+0 y fir►-+T_. DrrZ� M = 0 0 � mm ►- rnrn I-- 3r*�2�-• ;a 0 V i] G V co H V H t-/ "� 1C ;J 1 3Wa)M 1 )> r- 1 rr 1, "Ur 1� �rr� 1 tnoCrn 3-q w �0000zw armm w tart l�� w �'M w tW;omn;uMIw W i7 :t D W iz m 0 0 Vt 3 o►HHrA� o- S«r 00rnrn W rn �-���mA ..• <Z �o►.• M41 2• zZ ul 0rn-4�OA M :t 3 )► i7 > %o T► ii f-t )%. _ v o 0 0 -4 m-o r o N r o m -4 cc m N ►+ L4 lr1,1 r-- V ►-� j 0 ,O 0 Vi o� M V H ivl O �' •�lei "Nod - r r�J �1 I � 1 � 1 urn 0 �:4or CT X.O. Paw Le • -41-nm � rn H X rNn m v O A m z O --i �zory'rn v H z� t7 m -K aC) -1 to t Ot mDHrn qq 3 rn rn n c� M m � O Q� > maM t O mrn m Z -d Horn rn \mop. o=� �m m mM rn W 0 m o N Z7 N .t �rir�liv++•r A Q w rim M > :S O vmno o M 0 3 ; N m N ODD Ow QO► C] co L Ln O N O DTI m Ul o to O r"3Mo ZVA H vaiT.* ZOO � V = ��z aC2w w 3 m O P. H » rocz aa�-- ar3o H m C o,TOry O •� arnor>vsv m� �m m O V1 0 C1 N -� Lta<Ow > m H 01<m>0 WO% Nz r m r r- ►� rn rri ma N > Z m 3 o 0 N -1 o � o w rn• co H Ul w 0 El U �1 Regular i lecting July 5, 1972 VILLAGE OF ORONO of the Planning Conuaiss io" , Tile Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: C!iairman Peissort, Elliott, Gasch t Kullberg, and Searles. Absent: Hays, Nicholls, Ryerse, Soutlhwort;h, and Van Nest. Discussion was held as to whether five members were a quorum. It has decirled Cunt 50 % was a quorum, i�ullberg moved, Elliott seconded, that the 14ihlutes of the Regular i lee ting Of June 19, 19729 b'.• approved. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Hans 1.1ciler represented himself in a rcarrangenent of Lots 6-20-21-22-23-30- 31-32-33, Sharp & Lindquisis Fern hill. Brought out was: 1, Lot 6 was only to be used as 1 lake access for the remaining lots. 2, His pr escIlt cx tcndin g about 3. no wishcd to remchinder of Lot home has oil 4' into Lot place a new 22 and all L(,ts 20 F, 21 , 22. house oil tl►c; of Lot 23. 4: I -le wads not adverse to combining Lots 30- 31-32-33 in any combination with Lots 1.0- 21-22-230 Searles moved, T:lliott seco.hded, that recommendation be made that Tots 21- 20- 32 - :53 should be col3bi_ncd and Lots 22-23-30-31 sltoi'.Id be combined and a line should be dravin betv;cehh talc two to allow 0e 10' setbacl: roquired for the exi: tint 11011sc, 10ti011, Ayes (5) - Nnys Me ; toward Lindow, 1390 Rest Point I)%.oaLl , I rc pre ,ciit;ed llimscl f in a front gara ;c setbacl: from the required 35' to 21' . l.,rouglit out was: 1, Ites t ro.l ri t Road is a dead end street aj1 l t;1c site is vary net t;ic e11c1. I 2. Vie 21' i.10111c1 Rive hin room to parl: i car in front of t!hc n3raFe "it"out "uc"'fl- ' t i-ec:t traffic. t r i'11C• '1bove , I;cnrlcs s (. Co1h .1C'd Clat t ? '' A y 7 : 30 l'.'� M,jIZI1'1 1114UTLS RE'hik' . +:J (;E, iL''v T OF LOTS Nortlh .arm F, Elnilqood /I - GARAGE VAIZ I11;4CE 1 M I:es t Poii-A 11oa(I Vi 113ive Coti11Ci 1 Wet oil le allnv,. �•Iith talc f Ol Io!--f i1 nlclni)c;rs pr-.:scat: Cbcraauscr, , Collac 1 lmon But l r, )"oral, .lassell "al��, :lllli !cCart;ly, C:owici t111:1,1 Dorn left early, Butler Airutes 1972, a Ayes (S I t0 � 1yor rlovca, Wassen.,ale seconL'cd, that tilt of the Regular 'Iectina of June Zip, s amended, be approved. 'iotion t ) - Allys (0) . Born r:loveclI Butler secoslc'.-d, t'lat the request of . Stanley L'chluad, Pheasnat Lai -in, for a combination and division of Lots 9 F 10 as s,iown on tae two revised certificates of survey and Lo delete one wait water assessment, be approved. . lotion, Ayes (5) - Mays (0) . lassengale moved, : icCartby seconded , teat a buildisig pormit for a canopy ill coal juactloll With the nultiplo clock license vita the right to use the structure to ru» wit;1 t!lo multiple use dock, for the Power Squadron, Bia Island, be approved. i lotion, Ayes (5) - days (0) . hassengn le moved, 'icCartiq seconded, that it be resolved that the Registered La;i(: Survey for Robert 11, Sniti1, Casco Circle, i*e approved, :lotion, Ayes (5) - Pays (0) . :Iassen�1le lnover�, Dorji scconclerl, t1lat referral to the Planning Commission on tale basis of prior coils ideration by Vie Planning CAMPUSSioll for a variance for StCp'ICII Pedersea, 3229-C Casco Circle, be waived. .lotioll, Ayes (S) - !lays (f)) . Butler moved, 11cCar thy secon(led, tiro t t;le request of Stenilell Poderseli, 3229-C Casco Circle, for a variance of S' front setbach and 15' rear setback, lie approved. lotion Ayc:a (S) - Aays (o) . i Isut icr move(l, i 'asseng.110 seccrl�lecl, that regtic:st of Il;�l�s �rciler 1135 :I orth Arm and Ulmlvood Avcllllc, for a divisicll .Lllcl suu ject to the owner granting .ill opc:1l Meat to t'.lc Village of Orono oil Lot G, lotioli, Ayes tII 1)r *1 vc; c0111h.,jlatioil space ease - be capprovc--d, ..I I *.: ; I'1' 1.:, CO LIIIAATIO,� C, DIVISIw4 Pheasant L uin 1;11I L!►I YG P;.:: 11 T Power Squad roa is i B Island REGIS'f 'lt -n LANs SURVEY Casco Circle V A I z I XJIC:I" 3229-C Casco VAR I Air CE 3229-C Casco Circle Circle CO 16'11%'ATIOA f: 11.35 4u1'tI1 Ar;'I 1:11111.1o.)&I :1VC 1111 DIVISIoN Dri1�C Ft ICCATM4�410 ��3 CUILPI E��5 PENV11T A 4% rnMl1 r L r ©O VILLA03 OF ORON100 hM*l-,,is'60:SOTA OIRECTICra SPACES NUP.*3ERED t tMAU 13btUST 8E FILL E01N CEFOflE PER".11T IS 1*:..Ur-O (Please Pr,n1 or Trot) STATE F t E - �rCO PENALTY FEE • ----, TOTAL F E E PEA'AIT ► O V A15 rplC r 1 SITE ACOnCCS 2 DATE 11.5.6 /f/0 // - ;? - 3. LEGAL OEwLpIPTION PLAT NUMBER 43 4o?d PARCEL NUMBER 4. Or-3114 (Nome# IAddrossl ..__._. ..�r IT01 No I Aafts ee-l"h- e - �, %e, S. waCHITECI (Nsmol tAddressl ITe1 No 1 9 EIUILOER 7. TYPE OF WORK (Name) IAddrossl ~-- d r - 0. BIZ - F STI:IlC1U,1E Ilto,�.tl 11'!�%;'�l tl)eMlhl _-___C?�Z_ 11. W-TLETIC3 DATE 14. i Yi•E OF co'.: I'lluc I ION 17. FRCUT Yl.nO Jj I'V 9 NO OF STORIES 12 PftOPrZnTY OItAEt j10:rx 15. 1'r.CG;,CATY AREA 10 E 5 T IrAA T E U CO; t 13 14D OF FAMILIES 111 A;.plse able) tli LOST AREA PER FAMILY SO FT 90 FT 10. HEAR YAc:O �- 19 Y51UE YAIIUS 1a AOt�1�mw"3Lt+000f ,'Et4T ACED �;OD�ATURE: The under .Igne-d hereby represents upon all of the penalties of law, for the purpose of inducing the VILLAGE OF 0 t0';0 to tr.'.e tho action h,�reln requested, that all statements hervin are true -1d that P iork herr�ln Inelltlr-;ed will be done in eccordCnce mth 14% wrlis ;,nro � VILLACw OF 0^0NO, the State of Mlnnrsota, nd rull )s o h Qli Wing 0cpartment. I 1' , '�11A I'1ttl '� APr'ftnvro 11nE tut�F AGGREGATE FLOUR AHIEA FLOOR AREA RATIO MATERIAL FILE WITH 01-FSTIQE T PARKING CONSIAU(.TIOrd FOvI1 _ F nAI.:ING CLPT11 If r.TE OF OCCUPANCY I'-JUEO fly 10/ QFr�lfTAii�:� Gil :::4%i �QG71T Aclb:) MISti�YALC Gi OCCUIPAc9cy VtLIACZ 0P ORONO* MIHNESOTA QifiECTtO:s+ PEA t T27 (PACES WL4► 1010 1 TIOU 13 &MT OE FILLED IN � 0 2708 BfFCLIJ PEMAIT 13 J=AD EPlsse Pro! or Type1 1 SITE SS 2 DATE .3 e-1.00 3. LEGAL OL•SCRIPTIOM PLAT MAMA PAMEL r-V-fn[P4. al _ E :01"1 IACQross l I T V I Not 9 S. "CMITECI ~101 lAGaressl 1101 S GUILCZA (Address) (Vol W I 7. TYPE OF VJ3nK S. WE OF STRUCyyTUIS 1. 140 OF STORIES is. lu Pnc.",my ount ,Ions 11. TYI'ii (i.� GG...T:�UCTICf� ' 117. FIXUT YAno I 15 P11GPC11TY AREA 13 AE4 YARD 10 ESTIMATED COST 13 f:0 0V FAMILIES III ApPlIceble) ----_ Ib Lt)T AnEA P[n FA!.;iLV f17 F T 19 SIGE YA %0; 0.3bI:C`0—'*"1LCC�"%d wC ;CCJT tSO CIC_:JATU.M: Tho urdmip*d hereby represents tpon ell of th,) pcncltics of Itw, for the purpso of inducing the VILU�C * 0;: to t3ko the action horoin recrioctod, that all rt4tcrncnts horoin ore true end t i-it all York horoin mentioned will ho d ono in cccord :nco with tho ordlncnco of the VILLAGC OF O: 0::0, tho Stote of Ulinncccto, and rulings of Via Cuitding Deportment. C i 1 ' sue/ SIGNATUnE AUPROVC r .sue PE TEAL T V i 1 E _ .^^-•--�— TOTAL FEE /f) l . S iI MOW.( olS: AIC T /, / C' F lat 104E m AGGREGATE FLOOR AREA , FLOOR APfA PATIO MAIER FILE WIT( OF i ST RE E t PARK lNG C & 5 l.ucT1 a, a F IRAMING t ' -L. At ". 2 17 F WAL — j CCRTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY ISSUED DATE / %' 1. I�Py_ )1 - i 9 I 1 1 i I I D-Oj s `f `r , i r• 1 t -DW z IIf:L�• �a 1 , a o- N 1:7j; Sal Lot - • ;ram '' �•�"• �/� • r 4 ��•. . � �� ; �� t� �, ` � •'" Zia- r Ap'—O-� lb �_ j ..- � i � Y= �'� -�,-.i •dam . � .. • '•• t ,�.• r • If I c h �' •: a x • 3 CE all 3 7 • O ^ • � 0 L � ••� atr r� o •v o ."� �o �► ♦Oi N � b 40 ;� B • AD •� IL- 0 go ` N •••�t _ N ± O` N 001 O ry • O O 04 r ` 7�• fn 4a r` M , M I N m x1 m OD CD N r . A* To: Planning Commission Members From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date: January 16, 1986 Subject: #1004 William Ulrich, 1535 & 1595 Bohn's Point Road - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Zoning district - LR-lB Area - 7.06 Acres (.48 Acres Wet) Pertinent Ordinances 10.55, Subdivision 15 A ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) minimum lot area require- ments for sewered areas containing wet lands/f l ood fringe areas 10.22, Subdivision 1 10.24, Subdivision 3 guest house use List of Exhibi 's Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - - hardcover standards - conditional use permit Application Property Owners List Planning Commission Minutes Council Minutes 10/14/81 Lot Line Rearrangement Hardcover. Survey For Parcel 9/21/81 standards for Mr. Ulrich proposes a lot line rearrangement of his residential properties at 1535 & 1595 Bohn's Point Road totaling 7.06 acres in area. As shown 1535 would contain 4.97 acres in area and 1595 at 2.67 acres (.48 acres of wetlands). Each parcel appears to satisfy the standards of the LR-lB zoning district. The area standard has been satisfied for Parcel B with 2 legal residential units. Staff has to question how we are to satisfy the required width standard of 140 feet. The guest house, approved in 1981 for a previous owner, is located 30 feet from the principal structure. A division line could never be drawn between the guest house and principal structure to satisfy both the 140 feet lot width standard and the side setback standard of 10 feet. Review Exhibit E. If a lot line was drawn 10 feet from the principal structure, the guest house lot would measure 130 feet maximum width. In r?cent conditional use permit reviews dealing with guest house structures, lot width standards, in relation to future division lines, were considered i.e. the Winton application. If you review the enclosed minutes that deal with the B 1 ohorn appli- cation you will note that approval was based on the finding that there was adequate lot width to satisfy the second unit. Zoning File #1004 January 16, 1986 Page 2 of 2 The current guest house structure with a second story that functioned as conditional use permit was require; install a kitchen. The structure a and changing rooms. The kitchen structure. was originally a garage L cabana/pool house. The -ruse owner wanted to y contained a bathroom as never added to the The property contains 318 feet of width and is proposed at 235 feet at the building line and 140 feet along the shoreline. Planning Commission must decide what is an acceptable lot width for Parcel B considering the maximum possible lot width of the potential guest house lot at 130 feet at the building site. Staff has discussed this matter with the applicant advising of the affect of the guest unit on the proposed division. He understands the problem but wishes to proceed with the applica- tion as originally proposed with 2 residential units on Parcel B and awaits Planning Commission's directive. The City will ask for a Flowage & Conservation Easement over the pond and drainageway area. Applicant must provide a metes and bounds description of the wetland and drainageway for the required easement. Note, there is 26.7% hardcover within the 75-250' setback zone. If lot line is to be rearranged providing more area in rarce 1 B, the excess will no longer exist. If lot line remains as is, applicant states he will remove excess of 1.7 s.f. hard- cover within pool area. Planning Commission must decide how much footage will be required to satisfy lot width a) along building line: 1. Additional 45 feet: Required = 140 feet Principal Structure Lot = Guest House Lot = 130 feet 2. Additional 40 feet: Required = 140 feet Principal Structure Lot = Guest House Lot = 130 feet b) Along Shoreline: 1. If 140' maintained future in additional riparian lot. 2. 280' required for 2 future additional standards: 150 feet 140 feet lineal division will not result riparian lots. Planning Commission Action Table application until formal subdivision reflects changes requested above. I J . CITY OF ORONO SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM Date Rec' d cP `( /-9 BY Fee Rec d ,SSG• ------------------------- ----------- ------------------------.---------------- APPLICANT Name William J. Ulrich Telephone 612-4 71-8103 Mailing Address 1535 Bohn's Point Road, Wayzata, MN 55391 PROPERTY Name William J. Ulrich Telephone 612-471-8103 OWNER Mailing Address 1535 Bohn's Point Road, Wayzata, MN .55391 (Attach list if more than one) r--��---�4m -- -- - - - - ---. -------- - -- -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -------�� PROPERTY LOCATION 1535 Bohn's Point Road, Orono, MN 55391 Street Address 1595 Bolin's Point Road, Orono, MN 55391 Property Identification No. ( P. I . D. )117-- Complete Legal Description to be attached to application - - - -- - - - - �- - �- - - �- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -r -� �- - �- .- - .- - - �• - - - - --------- EXISTING LAND USE 04 C,r-. Number of Tax Parcels � r Development Size Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check) Present Zoning District ON Residential; no. of units Other (specify) � 4"--r---- - -- ---- -.. - - --..---.-- - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - -- -- ---- �.. - - - ---------- PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes X Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new builr:'yng sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Existing Units New Units Total Units Units per Acres Square Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) - - - - - - - - - -. - - - - r- - -. - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .- -. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (OVER) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION ^� ✓ 1. Application Completed 1/ 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is —" complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date w wry _ _ _ � _ � _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ - -- -- _ - -- - - - _ f. - _ _ _ - _ - _ -- - _ _ _ - - - - - _ - - _ - -- _ _ MINIMM 14ATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees ( park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date � �ftw qm - - - - - _ - - w - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FBR.S Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivisions) $150.00 $250,00 --- Preliminary Review $300.00 plus (Class III and all non-residential) 20.00/lot Final Plat Review (Class III) $150.00* *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) w - - - - • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • � _ Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. --------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- Applicant's Signature v ,e/22L, Date IZ 1 ej Owner's Signature Date Z Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are usually held on the third Monday of each month. -♦ O --1 Q v -� O T1 -� o 'O --� G -1 O Z7 C) 27 ZA}-� Zb? Zr-�"►� Zax71 Zraf m rxo bx o i.x o rxzo >x�c� vX�o -4 S �-jmm=iIn(In M V+n'a 3mro u rt�rn� 3�rnV n rnDA rn>A rn>70 +nDM r;i rnD�7 S O >rn i Dm 0 Dm Dm 0 yrn t0 >rn q n o�>o 0, o;oa0 c��z•o 0M v vM>v o m o :s ao o :c Vo :c o os o ao r m M rn ao rn ao m rn m r• 0 ��rAow Z•- oboes fow wrnmaW w O tn0m►-SOD >tn3mrn.-•0) AVi""I--W >r.)v wW Dnwi" wco � 4 Ly cl -1 to -< o CA > > V1 -< w r- r- V1 -< C• 0 tr N -< N n Q+ N co > N o r m 00 N o Z Z o N W r- r- w N Vi o. N o S ry M r- ?► 00 > -0 oo o D3 -� CD .p -�i O A �f '♦1 .p -i C7 A --1 0 A CD -D-1 a N O >aVM rI AOa r: >z3 >=to I a00b 1 zz z 1-I � � CD t✓ Z L C- CD . 3 z n O CD •- ZC r ►- n ...th 00V ZO OV 1w V ZM V Norrn0 V pp S 0m 1 19mZ = 1 CC2 1 �)w � >Z= 1 21Zmzm -4 )wZra Vr N r-ZN ZN Vr- ZN��JfW zV)WV)w-I=�u)w �-4 W Or (AW wmoo �w vi = ow wos=o w3 �F w�ul m �F 1c -1 CA w to o -4 w tom n m to 0 Z p o ho "' �o �o `"�� � o aa�o� z��n pow rin boo rn �vo+ r 00 v o 000, o > os zm . Z rn H Z t7 O0- 4-0La E•ra0aw EZOw �WSSOw 2w0a0� -0 MO, OP - CD >toOO►-Co 3.1�> rOo Nr*1 wM W 70 d NO` -CNC V1-<N9Mj% -<NE10N 01oN O-� O f"0 NOO N NO N to N mN717 b1 V ��yyO�' > r00 A hi COO ��VIO OLO0 m 0 = 1 w �; P. %0 -1 C7 Cl %a -4 O 0 'fl m Go ; 1 30.00(A 1 DOrnZ 1 3*Or-(A 1 �~ 1op n Iwo --10 Z CO 0-- ZmmCD� $ ZC.0Co0- ,-(Bm ..• Orn N 0 -1 O V � v� O V � cA M 0 -1 � to r->� V rn 0 CD OSZ a: 1 EZS r m-4 1 r"C-H... 1 -1 V?-V Zry ►-+►-�Zr.3 -o)srn2N 17low -11'N wmCDZ ry -� V1O (aW a m M W W 00mWw a aw to o1AaW rr w"1-1 V1Mnn V1Hm too-4w-4" mH 10zr" mf%) Vi ~V==m(A tZz vw tnZ 1-Mz0 41.%NzON 1rnrn-� HW LW -4 0 a (A � onrnigo o o m o > �ZE0 MW H v lap O -n r o m Z m S ,s T►+000W EZ% clfl0 W ' Cl G)00 0 >0-C) bMm CD 'dO. ..•CD Mtomm.-i >NmrnW -4 -4 -<rosvl r+v0 �D3r 04)m oul-<0%m:0" -1Q� �J�V �C'omDo.00 NFn�o0 Ow0a CD->IWsso� DA O 1 V-0 r 1 � mm + 1 >O 1 Y F :c V m tr Af Al 03 .. Z m cv �- cn 'n o •r Z r r O •� 2 .. 00 G)zw c:9W uicnrnuw :r tn"YU w mrnmmWw tommrn Ull mL4 wOZZ Vt0nn V1 Z7tr toZHAMW to : z13W .O►-� l7 W ZMAIV P O w rno�- w--1-�row CU�u�ow •-T�. O -i O -i F1 .O N z O O H H .p ►-'� rZO M Zo Hzzz0 ZO ZO c -1 0 -1 -4 0 --1 0 - �v o m 0 0 6-4m o *o o •-- o ..,.'' OW OV CD DOr VN �0 :7 CD r-- -1 A G7 rn 1 1 1 w I wr �o C3 i .r em 11 7n oom�. I"' n �m= �rnm� m� omm mi$� �nn� m m rn rnrnD QH rn Z m > vs O-4m rn v 7r Omrn 7mON� n -�Hn N N-4r" O Z �i!A irnrn m ao m am n m b N IV -4 N • MINUTES Cr' THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1981 Page 5 Jabbour asked that the City attorney advise the City of the REED Supreme Courts ruling that he is referring to. Mabusth noted that what was different in this application from the Bredeson application in which the City approved the creation of a new non -conforming structure. Rovegno moved to approve the hardcover and lakeshore setback variance application for Lachlan Reed rased on the hardships of the house location on the pennisula and the interior design of the house only allowing additions to be placed on the west side of house. Such approval is subject to the following conditions: 1 - Additional hardcover be offset by removing an equivalent amount of hardcover to supplement for additional hardcover. 2 - All drainage from new addtion be directed away from lakeshore side - City Engineer to review drainage culvert. Hammerel seconded. Vote: Ayes ( 5) , Nays (1) . Minority Opinion - Jabbour - He stated that he could not approve of such an application that approved expansion of a non conforming structure based on the recent State Supreitle Court ruling. (FONT. ) Gerard Blohorn and Dick Hassel applicant's attorney, were �ERARD BLOHORN PP Y present. Mr. Hassel noted that this was not an expansion 1595 Bohns Poin on the existing pool house but merely interior design changes Conditional Use within the structure. Permit # 6 5 2 Mabusth advised the Planning Commission that the building permit forbids the installation of kitchen facilities and not until the Conditional Use Permit was issued,could the kitchen facilities be installed. Rovegno asked if it was within -the code to build bathroom facilities without a Conditional Use Permit? Mabusth noted that the existing pool house already had a bathroom and that it was just a matter of relocating it. Goetten moved to approve the Conditional Use Permit for Gerard Blohorn for t;ie guest house located at 1595 Bohns Point Road finding that there is adequate area and width to support a second residential unit and subject to the condition, as required by code, that this unit may never by rented. Jabbour seconded. Vote: Ayes (6) , Nays (0) . I`1:C,U1.AR MEEIPTI NG7 OF THL �� RONO COUNCIL, OCTOBE'R 14 , 19 1 Page 5 � Alan Olson, City Planner, reviewed with the City VARIANCE Council the roque st of Lachlan Reed, 1499 Brackett's 1499 Brackett's Point Point Road, for a variance. # 6 51 Lachlan Reed Mr. Reed and his attorney Richard Hassel were present-, Butler moved, Mayor Van Nest seconded, to approve the variance request of Lachlan Reed, 1499 Brackett's Point Road, per the Planning Commission recommendations and subject to the removal of the blacktop as indicated. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) . Alan Olson, City Planner, reviewed with the City ONDITIONAL USE PERMI Council the conditional use permit request of 1595 Bohn's Point Rd. Gerard Blohorn, 1595 Bohn's Point Road. #652 Gerard Blohorn Mr. Blohorn and his attorney Richard Hassel were present. Hurr moved, Butler seconded, to approve the conditional use permit for a guest house for Gerard Blohorn, 1595 Bohn's Point Road, on the condition that the guest house never be rented and to pay an additional SAC charge. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) . The Ivy Place item was tabled until a later date at IVY PLACE MATTER the request of the owner due to his being out of town. Butler moved, Mayor Van Nest seconded, to approve the signing of- the final payment request of Latour Construction. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) . FINAL PAYMENT Latour Construction Glenn Cook, City Engineer, presented the following MEDINA-ORONO letter to the City Council dated October 7, 1981 INTERCEPTOR concerning the Medina -Orono Interceptor which states: Plans & Specs. "We have reviewed the plans and specifications for the "1981 Utilities & Street Improvements" for the Medina- Morningside area of the City of Medina prepared by McCombs -Knutson Associates, Inc. The plans and specifications are in general accor, ance with the pre- liminary report and joint powers agreement for the project. We would recommend that the City obtain copies of a l l easements and any casement settlement agreements on the project . " End of letter f TO: Planning Commission Members Point FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE December 12, 1985 SUBJ: #967 John B. A. Idstrom, 2580 Fox Street e iminary Subdivision - Second Review #968 - Conditional Use Permit for Driveway Crossing Wetlands List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey As Revised 11/27/85 PERMIT Exhibit E - Staff Memo of 9-11-85 t Rd. Exhibit F - Survey With OriginallyProposed Driveway P e ay Location & Culvert Data Exhibit G - Septic Report (Portions included foi- clarity) Exhibit H - M.C.W.D. Wetland Crossing & Culirert Approval Exhibit I - Staff Memo of 10/18; 8 5 This item was tabled at your September and October meetings pending receipt of additional information regarding the driveway and culvert, pending resolution of the Ruestion of access f rom the adjacent private road, and pending M. C . W . D . approval of the wetland crossing. These items are now complete. The applicant's engineer has submitted a soils report indicating that suitable areas exist on both lots for shallow trench drainfield systems. He has also provided information regarding the necessary culvert sizing for the area where the proposed driveway will cross the designated wetland in order to access the rear building site. This :ion is not a DNR protected wetland. The Watershed District has given en their approval of this crossing and culvert proposal, and City Engine`r, Glenn Cook, has recommended that a corridor 32' wide be allowed for the proposed driveway, with conservation and flowage easements taken over all the wetlands on the property. Note that the proposed driveway location creates the least disruption of wetlands necessary to access the back portion of Lot 1. Applicant is requesting approval for the driveway to access onto Fox Street to serve both proposed building sites. Access easements across and in favor of each lot would be required. Note that with the proposed driveway location on an easement over Lot 2, only the area west of the driveway easement is considered in the contiguous dry buildable lot area. The app� icant I s surveyor has re -designed the lot lines and located the proposed driveway 26' from the wetlands, and with a 20' driveway easement, the revised plan will keep 2. 0 contiguous acres of dry bui lable west of the driveway easement on Lot 2. Also, the revised proposal keeps 2.1 acres of dry buildable west of the easement at the lower erid of Lot 1, should the applicant wish to divide of f a 3rd lot in the future. Note that with the current division the City will require the dedication of approximately 18.7 feet of right-of-way over the traveled portion of Fox Street. ( Fox Sty-eet is platted at 66' wide, but the traveled portion actually extends a few feet into the Idstom property.) This will reduce the area of the "f uture " potential lot to 2.0 acres, still meeting the 2-acre requ rement . I Zoning Files #96.7 & #968 December 12, 1985 Page . 2 of 2 The Public Works Coordinator has reviewed the proposed driveway access location and finds it very suitable with good sight distance both directions. Finding that all requirements of the RR-lB zoning district are met, staff would recommend preliminary approval of the preliminary subdivision, subject to the following conditions: 1. Submittal of driveway access easement documents between Lot 1 and Lot 2 as appropriate. 2. Dedication of standard drainage and utilities easements at the property boundaries. 3. Dedication of standard conservation and flowage easements over the wet lands on the property , a l lowing a 2 0 ' corridor for driveway purposes. 4. Dedication of 18.7 feet of right-of-way for Fox Street. 5. Payment of Park Fees in the amount of $ 2 0 0 for the 3.4 acre lot and $100 for the 10.1 acre lot. Staff would recommend approval cf permit for the f i lling of the wetland provide access to the rear of the culvert as approved by the City Subdivisions 8 and 12, a variance and conditional use s in a 32' wide corridor in order to property, with the appropriate Engineer, per Section 10.55, Cl 6 CITY OF ORONO SUBDIVISION APPL':CATION FORM Date'ec'd By U l z Fee ecd .7 7 v� '5a . vo - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPLICANT Name _ .TC�,S//fJ ,B.of/z,1, 2fD/_s'i,; .%/_ Telephone Mailing Address 2 5eO x J*7X f-6 r S' 3., q PROPERTY Name Telephone OWNER Mailing Address (Attach list if more than one) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Street Address 2 SRO .J'TiP C_F T _ , Property Identification No. (P.I.D.) Complete Legal Description to be attached to application ---------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels / Development Size Acres Dry Land 3,1 Acres Wet Land i3, S- Acres Total, a l l Present Use (check) X Residential; no. Other (specify) Present Zoning District', parcels of units U -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: / Existing Units r New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density .? Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Units per /:i.5' Acres Square Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ( OVER ) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Application Completed 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that complete. Zoning Officials Signature Preliminary Plat Application Date is -------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of. security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date -----------------------.----------------------------------------------�1.o FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivisions) Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) $150.00 $250.00 $300.00 plus 20.00/lot Final Plat Review (Class III) $150.00* *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by ;.-he Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Sigiiaturg_"",� Owner's Signature ------------ r, i Date to Applicant must hav, all ubmittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission e ing. Planning Commission Meetings are usually held on the third Monday of each month. _ G _ l �. - Date Rec' By C� Fee e c ' d ,tom; �� • t t� CITY OF ORONO -7 / 7 7 r� SUBDIVISION APPLICATION F �� 00 ' ------------------ ------ Ncc � --- ----------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name .70,�,y1f/ Telephone ,t1�1'- Mailing Address 2 �od"0 PROPERTY Name OWNER Mailing Address (Attach list if more than one) .S's3 9 Telephone 4rr----------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -.-r -- - PROPERTY LOCATION Street Address 2 SXO f *7A r- or T Property Identification No. (P.I.D.) Complete Legal Description to be attached to application ----------------------------'---------- -. ------ ---------------------------------- EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels / Development Size lam. Acres Dry Land 3,1 Acres Wet Land /.?, S Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check) Residential; no. of units Q Other (specify) Present Zoning District A'' B �-we-- W.- •- -- --- - - - - - - - - r r w - -- - - - - --...- PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) �_ Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: / Existing Units / New Units L Total Units Proposed Gross Density e--07 Units per /:.5 Acres Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Square Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) ---------------------•------------------------------------------------------- (OVER) MINIMUM 14ATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY A I 1. Application Completed 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Gcvernment Center 348-3271) 4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date Nw- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MINIMUM !+MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date _____________________________________--_- __--_-_-__--_--_-_-__ _ -- u A FEES A 00 ' 4o o • Syetch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) $150.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivisions) $250.00 Preliminary Review $300.00 plus (Class III and all non-residential) 20.00/lot _ Final Plat Review (Class III) $150.00* *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all inf ormation required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature. , Owner's Signature . - - - - - - - - - • - - - - t - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . r Date to Applicant must hav a l l ubmitta 1 s into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission cue Ing. Planning Commission Meetings are usually held on the third Monday of each month. �l ! -40'13 --4071 -!O'D -40 M r-x 0 :-x :;0 X O AX O r•,� O S m a ;] rn D X7 rn a;a m y O rn > ;a S v IN. -< D \ -< D \ -< T- A \ -< b > �m Cl rn`c3 ArlZ0 T>rn,:o rnZv o -4 0M>C) C3;u 0 0;4r-ri C7;7X.0 C3M>0 O rn C7 ": ,Zi 0 _� xi 0 _, :a O i ;J L7 J X] 030 M rn M rn ;u m m m � rn o av N r� r� r- W E rg o -1 o w E r) o f W N W X N -4 W v kA o O C") -C -< CD A a, S ra W > O- rn I-4 p -1 0 --4 S m r- r) OD \ Z t1t T Z -t r) c.. m a► -[ U A D r- x > m -< co G� t3t7 No>Or4 No r- M -4 Z V7 O O O 0 > -[ Co A ►-q o >WnrnW o O OC7 0 rrZZ r --4 In E 4.` --I CO Cy00 L% ;�►O i D04•D I YO Z I r- SOn I --�x7o0 I :C to 0 X Z X r ►- n rn -n -4 ►- S C7 O O � rn o --4 Gn -n r- ? H m ►• 3 rn c n m �-• � �• AU%,W -4 (A O'n0 -4ztN"' -4Z cn3 V �rn V 3-<�--1 I -4rzx I -4C-50 I :tca"o I m I Z (A C C N (A N C7 G) N m C "� 'r1 rV r` 1 4 cl CJ W ;o DC'70 lM Cm1 ul OA ln�G)rn3 D i�H I."V7� r- �r-CnGn w �fn .� ry w 33 0H vlW m .o rn .a m vir- -MO W A -4 o ;o �. o ►r --4 0 tq n m o r o 0 -< D O o D O O D CA o V o 0% r- o +--CD r ri --4 o n N v M H i C n A ul m -4 --4 _ m p m r- --4 ErV0C3OW 01%303ow f-Uq OW r-La00oW 132 O ;>(7`D race -430`ADr)0) 00 00o OoA oQ! M-1 4 -< ra < to c, O r ;7 :u 0- E E ui Z u1 Z xJ w O -[ D N lT1 ►-r ri . 0 m -< C 0 o G') ►-+ o rr A OmviC2 O rn oo NL,L- tno zrnrivio m"a -4 r-N r r I-." r r r- ]DIP r m;a W A 30r I AfZ3 I Ar I -10 A X rt1 r .-.. X -1 ... ;t f-I 3 ? •.. yC r- -< Z] c7 ZUfmm N m0 V rZ7;0 Z --1-1 71}; I -if?eHX I";ONNr i 3 D-1r I Fes, -1 7-4m N to (A N 00 N 0M N rTl ;o 0 vi clf W :. O W �� m 0 W rn QnrncnL-1 L4 --i o E mm �H uz -4 o z\ •- v Z w Z W r,4 Ir o .- vi O --4 0 0 i` �o on Cl 2 o w w m3�o H:0 0 o V, to o toll :0 N o 0 o v Cl 0 o o .p r CD ►- A N -� O C ►-� Op N m o rn Z o :O -1 W rn CA M -1 m 3 �NOC?oW ENOoo W EN;zXC(A r-t`C1C10W Y0%rn NW >o,mm" A0%rn r,) 0) 0o=B0ca aao, -<W aav, -<V,Ha� utAa� Nlti� v NC: %A No-4 Ln o D ►-+WVlo A oo a =moo oO --1 -4-nMV +% -4'n Z% r►-Irnrn 4;� AO z n0 1 p0"> I arNcA I x -n ►-- x r- r •-- X z •- r- ►- 3 �.(AXr-O V ZN:rZO V �(A>rIn E CHv -iC►�x I -40(1x I -1-1'ox I VOr' I 3.: N C3co N Uf N 0tA0rr4 r N W r r- cn W r- O cA W V '. W vi w O O -4 V1 m Z - 4 G7 1 W Z w 00 t% Ul rn r N rn H .- W w w 3 3 N w 2 V7 ;a a0• o m o A o W rn o :0 N f^ A o o o N E -4 0 z c rn O r7l • 13 N N W r 0 0 a i O D . V w ^ M r 11 C�1 CL • pE o� b 1447 (34)in ,o - p a c �o •* t« 1.1 Y LOT 1t C'T 21 +' LOT 20 y WS9, w t: A: 'AIV48 04; 14 0 S p •af* ox 30 7j6.25 (q� 0 o R ti (�D1 0 0. LV1 1 i 1I ti 11 96 j-10 Ncn o, P 16) LOT 12 ,CST • (I0 LOT e r I. I Ica I J 1 �. � • ` to LOT 9 v ,moo T In 400i �s TT YGE , t5� r of Lots /,v Nof rN 41;,4k T _ " h /0. 3 t Ac,tEs wx� V N I 2,8 }.4C . wE r 1 7.5'AC. AkY 145.47'� _ ' `�rouofco( Cvw r/ cwou I ex j 2.2 t A cat EJ f r wEJ r 610 h_ iY N of coAD E JEMEAIr/ 1 z r C. 3 t Ac. t - ,> z, 9 t AC Y 116 r 6a �•Er���vol +� ro EcGf Cr I_ *1oAO 10 'Ao 0 Per wEr r of : ROAD E�1Tf Sul I BAD Fo Ir !z,'6 r.; X/ I a Certif: cate of Survey or John B.A. Ids from, II 13 and l.i, Auditors Subdivision i,c. Hennepin County, Minnesota 759.00 SEc.4-117-2j I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of Lots 13 and 14, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 229, HENNEPIN COUNTY, �LINNESOTA , using plat distances from the Fast line of said plat to establish the East line of the property, and using existing judicial land7arks,set in a registration proceeding,to establish the West line of the property. It does not purport to show improvements or encroachments except the existing travelled road. A'W / QS fr4✓cllcL COFFIN U GRONBERG, RrC. Gordon R. Coffin Reg. No. 6064 Nark S. Gronberg Reg. No.12755 Lard Surveyors and Planners Long Lake, Flinnesots Scale: Date ! o • o• 1" = 200' 4-2 84 -8 Iron marker found Iron marker set Judicial landmark found 7.4 .: /{ k .4 - /.J : •>� � 4 C ,e - 5- I To: Planning Commission From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant mooning Administrator Date: September 11, 1985 Subject: #967 (Subdivision); #968 (Conditional Use Permit) John B.A. Idstrom, II, 2580 Fox Street Zoning District - RR-1B, Single Family Rural Residential - 2 acre Application - #967 - Subdivide a vacant parcel to create two building sites #968 - Conditional Use Permit request to construct a drive- way through a designated wetland area List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application - Subdivision F'xhibit B - Application - Conditional Use Permit Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Plat Map Exhibit E - Survey The applicant is requesting to subdivide a 13.5 acre parcel (10.4 acres dry buildable) into two new building sites. Proposed Lot 1 - 7.3 acres dry (3.6 dry contiguous acres at building site) ; 2.8 acres wet Proposed 2 - 3.1 acres dry (2.6 dry contiguous acres at building site) ; 0.3 acres wet Each iot meets the r-inimum area and width requirements. Note that the building site for Lot 1 ; ; :;,I,- the north end of the property. Septic testing has beLn completed but has not been submitted as of thi z) writing. The site evaluator notes verbally that trench systems can be used on both lots. Access to Lot 2 appears to be via the private gravel road on the west side of the lot. Access to Lot 1 has not been designated; 60' corridors have been shown to the west side and to the south, leaving the driveway options open. In either case, the designated wetlands will have to be traversed, requiring review by the watershed District and requiring a conditional use permit. No information has been submitted regarding -the amount of f i 1 iing to be done for the driveway, nor information about the size of culvert needed, etc. Staff would suggest that Planning Commission hold the public hearing for both the subdivision and conditi.ona i use permit applications, note any comments by the public and make your own comments, and continue the hearing to your October 21st meeting pending receipt of additional information from the applicant: Zoning File #967 September 11, 1985 Page 2 1. Septic testing report 2. Proposed driveway location and other engineering data regarding the driveway construction in the designated wetland 3. Written confirmation that the owners of the private road will grant legal access to Lot 2 The plat will, of course, be subject to the standard drainage and utility easements at all property boundaries, and is subject to conservation and flowage easements over the desgnated wetlands area. 4ft .00 G. r1 1� 10 v%will' L in t 2.6 i A CXEf 6 DAvr/GuOUf e F0 r y f I OCT 7lc,.7lwm Certificate of Survey or John B.A. Idstrom, II of Lots 13 and 14, Auditor's Subdivision No. Hennepin County, Minnesota A J P ER C %ri • /ilA�',Z 759. 00 Fo3 t y4 Zorncr Sec. 4-117-Zj -' 229 - I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of Lots 13 ana 140 AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION 229, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, using plat distances from the East line of said plat to establish the East line of the property, and using existing judicial landmarks,set in a registration proceeding,to establish the West line of the property. It does not purport to show improvements or encroachments except the existing travelled road. X'00d 0s tra vcllear COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. Gordon R. Coffin Reg. No.,6064 Mark S. Gronberg Reg. No912755 Land Surveyors and Planners Long Lake, Minnesota Scale,* 111 = 200' Date S 4--2-84 8 -� .3 -8S Lo f viviJiaa • Iron marker found o : Iron marker set ® Judicial landmark found 7-v7,1L i4Xe.4 = IJ 5 0' 14C•VFJ 3. i .t .4 c e F.f w c r /0. Y 11 ^ cl? cs 04Y 1 • •. 1• .r • ` • .o � • Z _ � ti rn 1 Is Put C � ••c` ,� 1 •,r—• .* --—••.-�— — —. I - - -- r- • is 11 ' •••••••••••• :. I • 41 •• •� • •so G •iI• �� •i_•• • i ` �� Y •�••• •11• •• •••`�• � air "�^ • ' • == 46 • •I•••• •• •1• v� •' • \ •• • • 1 see • amass •.�-•'- � �/s�:.41'��- � �! `�.i • . Ip • to L� r • I � PPP �� _� � • r � • • • �1 • j Q7 / 11 �1 t •i `o e` �• r ' • .. O I` •� • too$so •' i \ V. cOP �` o o o Z In rn ca rn o c� S a N > .. m— .....MEWeJ IU A j (�1 v z rp •D 00 p N V) Z •0 m 0 - c W (p s crt � art N � � 0 = • O o 0 0 o v n� Vi Q D � m a r-) N+ rn A �� 1 W z N �— rCP n V1 rn ^3 `.13 CONTROLLING 0 0 Glcr 1{w m w -� IT m e O � r' -- C t� U1 tT1 71 - m ro r" cn n o -mi A CA D M N m 3 o Z z m � .. -� 0 m r o � 3 4 vi n o f Ul wmmmft�l I N!\ - n m G � �D C - oll- N e,b a al 0 F Glb � n Q O UN N w :F- i SITE EVALUATION REPORT FOR JONN B.A. IDSTROM, II IN LOTS 13 & 142 AUD. SUB. No. 229 - ORONO, MINNESOTA 10-5-85 OAT CITY OF 1� 6ft ORONYwank — On August 29-31, 1985 two proposed lots were tes�ed for both primary and alter- nate drainfield sites to determine their suitability for on -site drainfield sys- tems. Testing was done in accordance with Individual On -Site Sewage Treatment System Standards(WPC-40). Lot 1, the north lot, had an average percolation rate of 7.7 minutes for the primary site(holes 1-4) and a rate of 10.4 minutes per inch alternate site(holes 5-6). With the possibility of a moderately nigh water table, shallow trench systems would be needed for both sites. per inch far the seasonal Lot 2, the south lot, had an average percolation rate of 21.6 minutes per inch on the primary site(holes, 1-4) and 15.2 minutes per inch for the alternate site(holes 5-6). Because of the high seasonal water table, shallow trench ' systems would be needed for both sites with some fill required over the trench- es or an interceptor dra i nt i 1 e used to lower the water table. Arm i t inns 1 i nfnrmat inn fn 1 1nwc Tf ;env nthpr i nfnrmat inn i c nPPdPd _ nl PASP contact me. Sincerely, PERCOR, INC. > D G Mark S. Gronberg, P.E:� PCA certified nor / J"e A 14. W.O� SY A 97.s • X .y / P-, 9S, 'OoAm'sot le 9y.I r/rr My p1. o S6_3 ?6. *7 ,� c. r i fA14 re r ATE SO/L ,9o,ewG : S,B - / flOO r FL E !/ ; Q 3 , / D� ram ,v A rruA E o / 'r • % v/ ` / % / ,,- LOT 2 4 e 0 pare- : io - 5--8s fC.tI- E : / ', i040 ' f'E.t c fro z E : .00- / eon l yr 1' e - / 6-Z f v: is i, y p t ree^ o4 rru^n E ,0 0 EO 0 NEHAHA CREEK LAKE MINNETONKA c 4h c� ff� t P.O. Box 387, :Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 BOARD OF MANAGERS: David H Cochran. Pres -Albert L Lehman -John E Thomas Michael R Carroll -Camille 0 Andre • James 0 McWethy -James R Spensley Permit --Application No: 85-180 Date: November 27 , 1985 Owner: John Idstrom II 2580 Fox Street Wayzata, MN 55391 Location: City of Orono, Sec. 4DB, south of Luce Line, north of Fox Street between Old Crystal Bay Road and Willow Drive. Purpose: Culvert installation to cross an unprotected wetland to allow access for a 2-lot subdivision. Dear Mr. Idstrom : At the reyu 1 arl y scheduled November 21, 1985 meeting of the Board of Managers, the subject permit application was reviewed along with the following exhibits: 1. Permit Application 85-180 received November 13, 1985. 2. Certificate of survey dated April 2, 1984, revised August 23, 1985 prepared by Mark Gronberg, P.E. 3. Culvert design computations, dated October 16, 1985, unsigned. 4. Copy of USGS quad map showing estimated boundaries of tributary drainage area. The Board approved the permit application. This permit is valid for one year. If construction is not complete within one (1) year, an extension must be requested. Please contact the District at 473-4224 when this project is about to commence so an inspector may view the word; in progress. EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES E n g i n r,49 fo th IM tri c cc : Board G. ,Macomber C.---City of Orono Michael A. Panzer, P.E M. Gronberg // 2 Date of Issue bt • TO: Planning Commission Members r FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant DATE: October 18, 1985 Zoning Administrator SUBJ: #967 John B. A. Idstrom, 2580 Fox Street Preliminary Subdivision - Second Review #968 - Conditional Use Permit for Driveway Crossing Wetlands List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Staff Memo Survey with data of 9-11-85 proposed driveway location and culvert - Septic Report (Portions included for clarity) This item was tabled at your September meeting pending receipt of the septic report and information regarding the driveway and culvert; also pending resolution of the question of access from the adjacent private road. The applicant's engineer has submitted a soils report indicating that suitable areas exist on both lots for shallow trench drainfieid systems. He has also provided information regarding the necessary culvert sizing for the area where the proposed driveway will cross the designated wetland in order to access the rear building site. This information was received too late for the City Engineer to review it. Note also that applican-;-s engineer will be bringing this driveway/culvert application to the MCWD for approval at their November meeting, with no problems anticipated. We still have no written confirmation that access can be gained via the private road immediately west of the proposed division. Although this is still a possibility, applicant is requesting approval for the driveway to access onto Fox Street directly, to serve both proposed building sites. Access easements across and in favor of each lot would be required. Note that kith the proposed driveway location on an easement over Lot 2, only the area west of the driveway easement is considered in the contiguous dry buildable lot area. Assuming a 20' wide easement centered on the driveway as plotted, the area west of the driveway easement would still be about 2.0 acres. Staf f has suggested to the applicant that G driveway along the east property boundary would cause less restrictions for Lot 2 and any future division to the south. As it stands now, the proposed driveway would negate the southerly portion as a future building site because the area west of the easement is less than 2 acres. (See 10.03 Subd. 6(B) and 11.03 Def. 24) Both lots meet a l l width and area district. requirements of the RR-lB zoning #968 Idstrom • October 18, 1985 Page 2 Staff- would recommend preliminary approval of the proposed subdivision, subject to the following conditions: 1. Final driveway access location on Fox Street to be approved by Public Works Director, 2. Submittal of driveway access easement documents between Lot 1 and Lot 2 as appropriate. 3. Dedication of standard drainage and utilities easements at the property boundaries. 4. Dedication of conservation and flowage easements over the wetlands on the property. 5. Payment of Park Fees in the amount of $200 for the 3.4 acre lot and $100 for the 10.1 acre lot. Staff would recommend tabling the Conditional Use Permit application pending the City Engineer's review and the MCWD approval for the wetland crossing. Note that when finally approved, the Conditional Use Permit would include a variance to Section 10.55 Subdivision 15(a) (1). #968 Idstrom October 18, 1985 Page 2 Staff- would recommend preliminary approval of the proposed subdivision, subject to the following conditions: 1. Final driveway access location on Fox 5±reet to be approved by Public Works Director, 2. Submittal of driveway access easement documents between Lot 1 and Lot 2 as appropriate. 3. Dedication of standard drainage and utilities easements at the property boundaries. 4. Dedication of conservation and flowage easements over the wetlands on the property. 5. Payment of Park Fees in the amount of $ 2 0 0 f or the 3.4 acre lot and $100 for the 10.1 acre lot. Staff would recommend tabling the Conditional Use Permit application pending the City Engineer's review and the MCWD approval for t}.c wetland crossing. Note that when finally approved, the Conditional Use Permit would include a variance to Section 10.55 Subdivision 15(a)(1). y r .. .L,.•. . _ .. 7 J. 1. two �f� Liz R V 1• Q 1 !, •' • , • r �. •�•i.. ! . , '' • �' k .�•- t, • vr� � v � ,� 41 _ 'off'!• ;.`' 1'j i .• • ' � �� • j� a .: � r � - Oc too ft 06 'IV OJ 40, AD Ol ! t . - �' ~�� •fait• / • • •• LOT 12 4. ,{,•r • t I •7• •{ • i ®r,�&. Poe Aw At fA It I LOT 20 4.>s ,, M. P. ? •.,�..AML ''� •i.l; ,`•5,. FOX REST � �T 1• f ZONING FILE CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 35323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 12/31/85 ---------------------------.------------------------------------------- TO: John B.A. Idstrom, II COPIES TO: 2580 Fox Street Wayzata, MN 55391 -- -- -- w — ------ -- — — —.� —... — -- �. �. — — i. — — — — — r. �. �. — �. �. —.�. . �. �. -- — — .r — M- — --- -- — TYPE OF APPLIULTION: XX Subdivision —w...------ — -- �• ----�. .... �. -- — — — �.. -- — — — — -- —..�— — -- — -- — — — ----a --' — — — -- -- -- — — — — ------ Date of Meeting: 12/16/85 Vote: 6 For 0 Against Planning Commission recommends the following: XX Tabled: for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Planning Commission voted unanimously to table these applications until app 1 icant was able to appear. This item is scheduled for the January 21, 1986, Planning Commission meeting. You or your representative should be at this meeting. Please contact Mike Gaffron or Jeanne Mabusth at 473-7157 to confirm your attendance at the January 21st meeting. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Planning Commission January 21, 1986 If the applicant has troub'Le obtaining additional information, p'Lease contact the Zoning DepLrtment (473-7357 ). If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE: January 15, 1986 SUBJECT: Review of Changes and Additions to Proposed Ordinance Amendment of August 185 At your December *meeting you directed staff to prepare a new -- draft of the Ordinance Amendment to ref lest the many changes and additions proposed by Planning Commission members. Staff has �ftw prepared other amendments suggested by Planning Commission for. your consideration. If members propose major changes to any section, please submit them in writing. Planning Commission approved the following definitions: A. Definitions Commercial_ Operations - Operations where business is he hconducted by the sale or exchange of goods and/or services e on site for money or other valuable consideration except for ar those provided for in the home occupation section. on. he I have underlined the last phrase because I question the need to address the commercial uses allowed under the home occupation ordinance in this specific definition. Riding Academy - A building, structure or other facility which is used for the instruction and training in animal care arid handling for a fee or other valuable consideration. Lot Line - The property line rounding that particular lot except where any portion of a lot extends into the public right of wE,y or a proposed public right of way, the line of er such public right of way shall be the lot ling, Stables and Barns - private - A building or structure used or 4 ntended to be used for housing horses, mules, donkeys, or ponies belonging to the occupant of the property, and kept for noncommercial purposes. Note the 150 feet setback from nearest lot line has been removed so as not to conf list with required set, back in proposed conditional use permit ammendment. Yard_ Requirement - Those requirements which relate exclusively to the size of yard areas when such are required within specific zoning districts. B. Section 10.03 Subdivision 9(D) 1 As discussed at our last meeting the following section, already approved by Planning Commmi ssion in October, has been amended in order to distinguish between lakeshore lots intersected by roads or corner lots requiring special consideration or review. No detached garage or other accessory building shall be located nearer the front or street lot line than the principal building on that lot except on lots which have frontage on a lake and a rear _yard adjacent to a � treet, accessory buildings located within the street or rear yards of such lots are subject to the setback requirements of Section 10.23, Subdivision 6B, Section 10.24, Subdivision 5B and Section 10.25, Subdivision 6B except that detached garages may be located 10 feet from the street or rear lot line when doors face away from the street and a turn -around is rovid_ed on site. This section shall not apply to lakeshore lots divided by roadways or corner lots._ C. Section 10.03 Subdivision 18 You asked staff to review Section 10.03 Subdivision 18 (A) and (B) in order to determine the need for amending or repealing this section. Crop farms and the keeping of animals for non-commercial purposes are addressed under the respective conditional use permit or accessary use section of the code. The commercial keeping of animals such as that suggested by stock farm use is only addressed in Section 10.03 Subdivision 18A. other levels of commercial uses associated with animals are addressed in proposed amendments dealing with riding acadamies or stables and' barns - public. This section is really not in conflict with the rural zoning sections that allows the non-commercial keeping of animals as an approved accessory use, as was first suggested by staff. Section 10.03 Subdivision 18 deals with the commercial keeping of animals and should remain in the code. Staff recommends the following amendment of Section 10.03 Subdivision 1 8 (A). A. No new "stock farms" shall be created or existing stock farms enlarged more than twenty five percent (2 5 %) with animals over one year old except under the provisions of a conditional use perm, t. In considering any such permit, the maximum number and type of animals to be kept shall be determined by the Council. The site design and method of operation shall be reviewed 3T) j the Council shall find that the proposed or exist inch "stock Farm" will not in its opinion be detrimental to the public safety and the general welfare. E D. Es B. The establishment of any new building for the housing of animals or fowl on such stock farms shall be located 1 5 0 feet from the nearest lot line. Does the Planning Commission feel that minimum area standards should be required for creation of such stock farms, 10, 20, 30 acres. Crop farm, conditional use permit requires minimum of 10 acres. Is the .150 feet setback restrictive enough for a commercial operation. Section 10.03 Subdivision 21 Exception. The requirements of Subdivision 19 are not intended to govern the normal and customary grading in the area of an existing or a newly constructed building, or the. grading of the driveway serving such building, nor to an movement under 100 cubic yards which does not advers ly impact the existing drainage. Such grading and earth moving shall be approved by the Building Inspector at the time of issuance of the building permit, providing tha- a plan showing property drainage and protection of adjoining property has been submitted. Any unusual earth f i 1 1 ing, removal or grading proposed_ by a builder shall be referred by the Building Inspector to the Planning Commission and the Council for action in accordnance with this Chapter. Normally earth movements of 100 cubic yards or more should be considered unusual. The first underlined section was a staff amendment providing ordinance authority for the land alteration permits issued by staff for the past five years. Note under 100 cubic yards. The last underlined section is suggested by the Planning Commission as a standard for staff to use in determining unusual land movement when reviewing building plans. Staff must advise that every building permit: issued this year or in years past involved the movement of 100+ cubic yards of earth. Driveway construction in rural lots can run 300 to 400 cubic yards movements alone. Amend Section 10.22 Subdivision 3 Tree Removal Regulations - no trees within 75 feet of the shoreline with the diameter of six (6) inches or more shall be removed without first obtaining a permit from The City. Such permits shall be issued by City staff provided that at least a like number of replacement trees of a nature and placement acceptab 1 e to the staff are planted, anyquestion envo 1 vine the number of trees to be replaced will require Counci 1 approval. Planning Commission has already approved this amendment, staff has cited it as amendment of Section 10.22. Section 3 instead of listing it as a separate perform :nce standard 3 under Section 10.03 as originally presented. F. Section 10.08 Subdivision 3(A) Add following performance standards: (8) The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property; and (9) the conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the di ctr ict in which said land is located; and (10) the granting of the application is necessary for the. preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; and (11) the granting of the propos4d variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, inora 1 s, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. (12) that the granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardshi n or difficulty. Remember these are the standards applicable in variance reviews that were omitted in recodifications. F. Section 10.20 Subdivision Recreation Areas. Private gun clubs, archery ranges, ski slides, provided the area is fenced and no part of the principal use is less t1han 100 feet from any lot line. Note riding stables has been omitted from this section and replaced with a separate section for riding academy. G. Section 10.20 K & M (Re -letter K to M and versa.) K. Antenna Structure. One independent antenna structure with antenna or combination of antenna attached thereto, subordinate to and servicing the principal use or structure on the same lot and customarily incidentia1 thereto that is not attached to another structure provided the height of the antenna structure does not exceed 65 feet and the antenna structure is set back from any lot line a distance at least equal to the total height of the antenna structure. M. Animals. The keeping of commercial purposes including occupants of the premises. aggregate, exclusive of one acre must be available for each domestic animals For non- norres for the use of the A minimum of one acre in for the principal building, animal uIlit-, exceptIL 4 G H. hereinafter set forth. A mir. _glum of two acres of open pasture must be available for a single horse and one additional acre must be available for each additional horse. When the horses are kept stabled and do not require pasture for feed purposes, the m4nimuin pasture requirement may be adjusted at the discretion of the Council. Such minimum pasture acreage shall not include low lying lands unusable for pasture or grazing. Any person keeping such animals must comply with the provisions of the City Code. Somehow in the process of recodification their letter designations were exchanged. Note also the 150 setback distance for structures housing animals has been removed and addressed later in proposed amendments for stables and barns private and public. Section 10.20 Add the following new conditional uses: N. Stables and Barns - Private. The use of an accessory building for keeping animals for non-commercial purposes provided it is for the non-commercial use of the property owner or resident and meets the available area standards outlined in paragraph M of this subsection. Further, no such structure shall be closer than 150 feet to the nearest adjacent residence and no closer than .75 feet from the nearest lot 1_ ine . 0. Stables and Barns - Public. The use of accessory buildings or land for the stcrage or rearing of animals not owned by the property owner or resident. Such must meet the requirements of paragraph M of this subdivision. Furtl-.-2r, no such structure shall be closer than 150 feet from the nearest lot line. P. Riding Academy - Any such instruction maintained as a accessory- use and conducted by the owner s-ha 1 1 meet the requirements of Section M, F, and 0 of this subdivision and no such instruction shall occur at least 100 f cet from an adjacent residence or closer than 50 feet from a front or side lot line. Does Planning Commission feel comfortable with suggested setbacks for above uses. Are thel e other standards appropriate for such uses? Section 10.22 Subdivision 1 Section to be amended as follows: Subdivision 1 Lakeshore Set Back Regula, ions. The set back from the shoreline for lakeL;hore lots: 5 A. Shall be 75 feet for all structures except that fences under 42" may be permitted within that Setback area. On lakeshore lots divided by a major thoroughfare the following structures are permitted on the lakeshore portion of such lots within 75 feet of the lake and require a building permit from the City: 1. lock boxers not to exceed 20 square feet in area and 48 inches in height; and 2. fences not exceeding 72 inches but shall not exceed an average height of 42 inches above the height of the crown of the intersecting road. I know Planning Commission has reviewed this one before but. in light of recent Council action, staff would guess the only part of this amendment to pass would be the required 75 feet setback for all structures and the special allowance fog lock boxes. Add Item B to the above Section B - no principal or accessory structure si:a 1 1 be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shore line of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots but not within 75 feet of the lake except that this does not apply to structures allowed in sub section A above. Note this amendment would now include accessory structures under the average lakeshore setback standard in addition to removing reference to nearby lots when determining the aveA age lakeshore setback line. For the past f ive years staff has only related to residence structures on adjacent lots - the amendment. more clearly reflects staff's practice. I. Section 10.22 Subdivision 2 Amend section as follows: Subdivision 2 Within 75 feet of shoreline there sha i. 1 be no excavating, filling, hardcover, temporary or pPr.man,nt structures except as permitted under Subdivisic. 1 �f_ this section. Within 75 to 250 feet of the shore 1 inE_ there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover_ Within 2S0 to 500 feet to 1,000 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 35% hardcover. Section aided to prevent any misunderstanding created by amendment above and for pur.pcses Df clarity. J. 10.27 Subdivision 4 A. Subparagraphs M and N 10.28 Subdivision 4 6 a K. L. A. Subparagraphs M and N Add reference to N to include public. Section 10.03 Subdivision 7 new use - stables and barns - One Building Per Lot. Except in the case of Planned Residential Developments as provided For hereinafter, no more than one principal building shall be located on a lot except that staff may issue a permit to use a manufactured home or an existing dwell my while a new principal structure is being constructed. Such permit shall expire upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new structure and such structure removed. This amendment will provide the legal means to permit the temporary use of trailers or existing dwellings during construction of new residence. Section 10.31 Subdivision 14 Open Burning Prohibited. It is unlawful t z)r any person to start or allow to burn any open fire oiL any property within any "RS" District without a permit except as permitted under the Uniform Fire Code. Members please bring amendment considerations. r3iv idea 1 Toning Code books for 8 x y Mo Ham_-�yN D b I�it m a a> �R-;% �-C FF9 ox�'SF r.� 7.• r 2 7 2 f9 �Q� N a � 1 r♦ y N r Jr r• -\ N O p A � a1 r• r in �rcqnr n%a< 7•D � �th TV.7 i'i .9 A N p x 'Ar•�� � y_�OA fop. � r•�rr•��a-4h��9 rr•r �a�o fi :�O p b^ mN'•r +n H O �Oy ry i� WAcell �t S 1N� Nw N n-.�nT eft .w: 7 � 9.9 N • C N� P Lake M �nc�anko 0 ►; TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR # 1004 WILLIAM J. ULRICH OF LOT I. °LYDIARD'S PARK" LAKE MINNETONKA LAGOnP SCALE ~IN—iFEE T h-01 WANi•+ jr a DATE NOVEMKR S, 1985_ }.ww�-.� tWr�r/� A� AND R GRONHAND E* o.rrs h.r •AY'+� LAND StMVErORS AND ENGINEERS DATUM MEAN SEA LEVEL LONG LAKE. MINNESC!A .tam .. •srr.•,•... ,..