HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-17-1986 Planning MinutesPLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1986 7:30 P.M.
1275 BROWN ROAD - COUNCIL CHAMBEW
COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - Tim Adams
ATTENDANCE
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:30 p.m. #1090 Roger Hollander, 200 and 250 Hollander Road
Subdivision
2. 7:45 p.m. #1093 P & A Investment, 1380 Sixth Avenue North
Subdivision
3. 9 :00 p.m. Zoning Amendment - Performance standards for non-
rental/guest apartments within principal residences.
ACTION ITEMS
4. #1074 Grace Baptist Church, 2830 Shadywood Roar
Variance - Second Review
5. #1080 John McDowell, 3750 and 3830 Bayside Roal
Rezoing - Continuation of Public bearing
6. #1083 Thomas Bernier, Doug Klint and Gary Barr
Place and 3034 Casco Point Road - Renewa
Application - Second Review
7. #1087 David W. Anderson, 860 Forest Arms Lane
Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing
8. 01088 Dale J. McCurdy, 4041 North Shore Drive
Variance - Public Hearing
9. #1089 R. Hunt Greene, 865 Partenwood Road -
Variance - Public Hearing
10. #1095 City of Orono, 2345 Blaine Avenue -
Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing
:4 ti •� •1.
11. #1091 Sailors World Inc., 1950 Shoreline Drive
Sketch Plan Review
12. #1092 Sailors World Inc., 1960 Shoreline Drive
Sketch Plan Review
ADDITIONAL ITEMS
13. Planning Commission approval of October 20, 198
13. Planning Commission to select a representati
December 8, 1986 Council Meeting.
. 1_ r�.1j J , f, :i . M
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ] ►XETI NG HELD NOVEMBER 17 , 1986
ATTENDANCE 7: 3 0 p. N e
The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with
the following members present: Chairman Kelley, Taylor,
Hanson, Goetten, and Bellows. Absent: Rovegno and
McDonald. The following represented the City staff:
Bu�.lding & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant
Planning & Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City
Recorder Petinrson. Councilmember Adams was also
present.
#1090 ROGER HOLLANDER
200 AND 250 HOLLANDER ROAD
SUBDIVISION
PUBLIC HEARING 7:30 - 8:10
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
John Hollander, Co -personal representative of the Hi ldur
P. Hollander estate was present for this matter. rijark
A. Ruri.k, attorney for the estate was also present.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the
application requesting to divide the existing Outlot B
of Holly Acres into two building sites. Outlot B was
created as part of the original Holly Acres subdivision,
and was designated as an Outlot because it was non-
conforming by virtue of the 3 residences on the
property: the original subdivider's (Mrs. Hi ldur
Hollander's) newer residence, a rental house next to it,
and a farmhouse with outbuildings in which her son, John
Ho 1 lander, resides. At the time of the original
subdivision, the City stipulated that:
1. The f armhouse and rental house were non-
conforming structures;
2. No permits for principal or accessory structures
on Outlot B would be 3 s-sued until Outlot B was
further subdivided.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the
issues unresolved from the previous subdivision
approvals:
1. Garage on proposed Lot 2 was to be removed and
has never been removed.
2. Access driveway serving the residences on
proposed Lot 1 was to be removed and regraded to
eliminate any direct access off of County Road 6. A
new driveway was constructed to serve the residences
on Hollander Road, however the old driveway war
never removed and is still used as a primary access
from County Road 6.
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD 17 , 1986
#1090 HOLLANDER CONTINUED
3. Road outlot ownership:
a) Hennepin County lists the City of Orono as
"taxpayer" on the road outlot with Hildur P.
Hollander as owner. Despite MI s. Hollander's desire,
this is sti 1 1 a private road and the City does not
own or maintain it. It was noted that the City does
not intend to t:�xe it over as a public road.
b) Mrs. Ho 1 ; ,ander apparently never filed the
paperwork t-o create a Homeowner's Association to
maintain the road and now the existing homeowners
are apparently not in unanimous agreement regarding
a Homeowner's Association, hence maintenance and
ownership of the road is a potential ongoing
problem.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaf f ron reviewed the
issues and fcacts regarding the proposed Lots 1 and 2 as
outlined in his memo.
Lot 1 -
a) Soil testing for alternate septic site for large
house pending. Rental house may not have a well.
b) Main house meets the required setbacks from
property lines.
c) Requires a lot width variance (186.90' where 200'
is required.
d) This is a "through lot" therefore any accessory
structures proposed would require a conditional use
permit.
e) The rental house is a non -conforming structure
requiring removal or granting of variances and/or
conditional use permit to remain as a non -rental
guest house or storage building.
f) Wetland drainage easement granted previously
should be shown on new plat.
g) Proposed Lots 1 and 2 are in different school
districts. I,ot 1 in Wayzata school district.
Lot 2 -
a) Garage which was to be removed must. be removed or
relocated to an appropriate location on the
property.
b) This is a "through lot" therefore any accessory
structures ( including relocating existing garage)
proposed would require a conditional use permit..
e) The existing barns are non -conforming structures
requiring removal or granting of variances and/or
conditional use permit to remain.
f) The existing house does not meet 50' front
setback (0.71' short).
g) Location of septic system unknown, t.esti.nq for
drainfield sites is underway.
h) Lot 2 entirely within Orono school district.
2
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17, 1986
#1090 HOLLANDER CONTINUED
Chairman Kelley stated that he felt some of the numerous
concerns should be resolved before the Planning
Commission could make a recommendation.
Bellows stated that the intentions of the proposed lots
was unclear_.
Mr. Rurik stated that they plan to comply with the
previous stipulations of removing the garage on Lot 2
and blocking off the driveway. He noted that a
declaration of covenants has been filed so a Homeowners
Association is not necessary (he will forward a copy to
taie City). Regarding the rental house, they would like
to keep it as a guest house.
Chairman Kelley asked if they would be willing to incur
the additional cost for testing and placement of new
septic if needed to comply with guest house standards.
Mr. Rug_ ik stated that soil testing is being done now and
does not want to make any committment until the results
are available. Regarding the barn...-, they would be
willing to give up the use by animals, but are opposed
tc razing them. He stated he would like to confer with
the City Attorney regarding the issue of the barns being
non -conforming structures. He further stated that the
reason subdivision is being pursued at this time is due
to the intentions of Mrs. Hollander's Will that Lot 1
(which is currently for sale) be given to Hollander's
daughters, and Lot 2 be given to John Hollander. He
noted that the existence of the barns, which some feel
is an eyesore, is unrelated to the subdivision request.
Public Comments -
Steve Weinstein, 2-5 0 Hollander Rd.- Speaking on behalf
of the Holly Acres Homeowners Association, they are
unanimously against the proposed subdivision for the
following reasons:
I. Lot 1 does not conform
code, and they feel the
removed.
with the 2 acre zoning
rental house should be
2. To the r
knowledge,
Mrs. Hollander filed papers
assuring them
that
before the lots would be
subdivided,
all
existing
buildings would be razed.
3. Existing
barns
are a
safety hazard.
4. Existing
well
water
may be contaminated.
Brian Hi 1 1 , 235 Hol lander Rd. - He stated that the
rental house is an eyesore and that there is a constant
problem with junk cars on the property.
3
MINUTES OF THE PLANN I NG COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17 , 1986
#1090 80 BR CONTINUED
Planning Commission Comments -
Bellows stated that she felt the Planning Commission
should not act on this application until clean-up of
property is done and original subdivision conditions
-ire complied with. She visited the site and felt the
buildings are in a state of disrepair and that the
rental house unit is not consistent with the other
properties as they have been developed.
Goetten stated that she has
with Bellows comments. S'L:
property lacks the required
guest house.
seen the property and agrees
noted that the rental house
area to approve the use of a
Hanson agreed that the original subdivision conditions
should be complied with.
It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Bellows, to table
this application and continue the public hearing pending
resolution of the outstanding issues. Motion, Ayes 5,
Nays 0.
Mr. Hollander noted that he has recently put money into
the clean-up of his property and that his mother never
intended that his house be razed.
Mr. Weinstein disputed Mr. Hollander's statement and
asked the Planning Commission to inspect the property to
make their own determination of the property's
condition.
Goetten asked staff to
moving the lot line a
necessity of a lot width
# 10 9 3 P i A IWESTMENT
1380 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH
SUBDIVISION
PUBLIC HEARING 8:15 - 8:38
consider the possibility of
few feet. in order to avoid the
variance on Lot 1.
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Applicants John Adams and Scott Powell were present for
this matter.
Assistant
Zoning Administrator
Gaf f ron explained
the
request to
subdivide a parcel of
land into 4 lots. A11
four proposed
lots meet the 2 acre
minimum dry
buildable
requirement;
have adequate building
envelopes,
have been
tested for
dr.ainfield sites (but
not approved
by staff).
Issues of concern are as follows:
Hinu1'ES OF THE NAMING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17, 1986
# 10 9 3 P i A INVESTMENT CONTINUED
1. Designated wetland on Lot 2 which has been
drained for many years.
2. Access location. Hennepin County has verbally
approved access to County Rd. 6, although tying into
Tanglewood Rd. would be preferable to City and
applicants. The Taog 1 ewood Homeowners have refused
applicants' request to access onto Tanglewood Rd.
City Attorney is reviewing this matter to determine
whether the C'.' ty can force the Association to allow
additional use of the road.
3. Staff finds no pressing need to provide for
future access to the north or east.
4. Barn on proposed Lot 3 would end up within the
front yard setback area, staff recommends removal of
this structure.
Mr. Adams stated that they would be willing to move barn
and incur the additional costs of determining the
wetland status.
Pete Rennebohm, 1520
finds no problem with
concerns regarding
wetland.
Tanglewood Rd., stated that he
the proposed subdivision but has
the drainage pattern from the
Assistant Zoning Administrator
City Engineer will be asked to
concern before Council review.
have an additional access on
decision is up to the County.
Gaffron stated that the
address Mr. Renn�bohm's
City woa 1 �' prefer not to
County Rd. 6, but this
Hanson asked why the Tanglewood homeowners are opposed
to allowing access onto Tanglewood Rd., noting concern
about more accesses onto County Road 6.
Mr. Rennebohm, speaking for himself, would like to
maintain the low traffic density for which he purchased
his property.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Goet.ten, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to
recommend approval of the preliminary plat as presented
subject to staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays
0.
5
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17, 1986
ZONING AKENDMENT - PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR NON -RENTAL/
been
GUEST APARTMENTS WITHIN PRINCIPAL RESIDENCES
PUBLIC HEARING 10:50 - 10:51
ba 1 1 y
The Affidavit of Publication was noted.
into
y and
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
Mused
and the pc:blic hearing was closed.
:)d Rd.
?rmine
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaf f ron explained the
allow
intent of the proposed amendment. to establish
performance standards for non -rental guest apartments
e for
within principal residences. He stated that the
Planning Commission should address these issues:
.n the
a) Is the "double the lot area" standard reasonable
ra 1 of
for a guest apartment.
b) Parking concerns?
e barn Chairman Kel ley stated that he felt such guest
g the apartments should be allowed under a conditional use
permit. He would like to avoid complete separate living
areas.
at he
it has Bellows stated that she would like to avoid an exterior
m the appearance of a duplex, but not legislate against live--
in help etc.
►t the Taylor stated that he was not as concerned about the
ohm's separate entrance issue, and would prefer to continue
got to treating these on a case by case basis.
this
Planning Commission directed staff to bring back to
their next meeting a proposed wording and performance
posed
standards for guest apartments as a Conditional Use,
)ncern
incorporating the following concepts:
1. I,ot area is not a concern if septic and parking
concerns are met; performance standards for these
ke to
shou 1G be proposed.
phased
2. The Conditional Use Permit: review process will
address the visual impact on the neighborhood of
each specific situation, with the goal that the
natter
guest apartment should not be an obvious second
dwelling unit when viewed f j,m without, and should
not have the appearance of a dupl rix, i.e. not have
�y,
two obvious "main entrances".
;ente
ed
3. Primary access to the guest apartment should be
Naysr
from within the residence, but secondary accesses
are allowable.
4. Wet bars and basement kitchens ;proposed with new
homes or remodelings that are obviously not meant to
become second dwelling urt i t s, need not apply for a
Conditional Use Permit as long as the building
permit states that they may not become second
dwe 1 1 ing tin its.
0
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIOR MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17 , 1986
#GRACE BAPTIST CHURCH
2830 SHADYWOOD ROAD
VARIANCE - SECOND REVIEW
Bill Mulligan
present.
representing Grac-e Baptist Church was
Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the second plan
submitted for the church sign that is considerably lower
in height and provides more signage area, which
satisfies the needs of the church. The new sign
proposal will create no safety hazards for the users of
the adjacent intersection on County Rd. 19. The
variances requested are as follows:
a) 49.6 s.f. or 413% area variance over allowed 12 s.f.
b) 3'9" or 49% height variance over allowed 8 feet
Staff recommends approval for the new sign proposed by
the Grace Baptist Church referred to as the Supra design
of the Herald I model.
Planning Commission
Comments -
Taylor - He
stated he
was in
favor of
staff
recommendation
to approve
the proposal
as submitted.
Hanson - He stated he was in favor of staff
recommendation to ;-,ppr ove the proposal as submitted.
Kelley -- He stated he felt the plan way overambitious in
regard to height and area.
Goetten - She agreed with Chairman Kelley stating the
she felt the "Standard" sign was more suitable.
Bellows - She stated a 413% variance is too significant
and she felt the needs could be satisfied with the
"Standard" sign.
Mr. Mulligan noted that Calvary Memorial Church has the
"Standard" sign and it is hard to read.
It was moved by Goet ten , seconded by Chairman Kelley, to
recommend approval of the "Standard" design of the
Herald I model noting the hardship being 12 s.f. is not
sufficient area to convey message and subject. to staf f's
findings. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 2. Taylor and Hanson
voted nay as they were in favor of staff recommendation.
The minority of two fey t the applicant had responded
very specifically to the direction of this r Jy at their
September meeting which was to reduce the height and
increase signage area as this was the primary need of
the church.
7
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMISSION MEETING HELD VIM— ER 17, 1986
# 10 8 3 TH014A S BERM I ER , DOUG R L I NT , AND GARY BEAM
3535, 3545 IVY PLACE, AND 3034 CASCO POINT ROAD
RENEWAL OF SUBDIVISION APPLICATION - SECOND REVIEW
Thomas Bernier was present for this matter.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that this
application was tabled pending resolving of the Bernier
property, in which M.C. Bernier was to either file for
a conditional use p�:?ry-ilit or apply for a building permit
to reconstruct stairs meeting city standards. Mr.
Bernier has agreed to rebuild the stairs. because of
the time of year, both Mr. K i int and Mr. Bernier are
unable to find contractors for their projects,
therefore, Bernier anu K1int: are willing to enter into a
developer's agreement and post. a letter of credit to
assure that this will be completed by April 30, 1987.
She submitted photos of the K l i nt property and stated
that staff is satisfied with the erosion control
measures installed by K 1 int. Staff recommends approval.
It was moved by Tay lor,
seconded by Be 1
1 -Dws,
to
recommend
approval of
the proposed lot
line
rearrangement
subject to staff
recommendations
(omitting
Item #?, Klint
to complete
sewer payment, which has
been
done), and
subject to
obtaining a hold
harmless
ae reement
from Thomas
Bernier for utility
line
protection.
Motion, Ayes
5, Nays 0.
#1087 DAVID W. ANDERSON
860 FOREST ARMS LAME
CONDITIONAL USE PERNI T
PUBLIC HEARING 9:00 - 9:07
The Affidavit
was noted.
David Anderson
of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was present for this matter,
Zoning Administrator Mabusth
conditional use permit to
Staff has not received any
neighbors.
explained the requ`st. for a
allow a 58' antenna tower.
comments f rori the affected
Chairman Kelley stated that he was
possible interference with neighbor's
would like the neighbors surrounding the
of the City' s limits of jurisdiction.
concerned with
reception.. He
applicant aware
Mr. Anderson stated that tie felt because
obvious structure, any reception complaint
directed at him.
I
he had an
s wou 1 d he
MINUTES OF THE PLANN I NG COMMISSION MEETING GELD NOV EMBER 17 , 1986
# 10 8 7 ANDERSON CONTINUED
Planning Commission stated that they were simply
carrying out the City's proper procedure of informing
the residents.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to
recommend approval subject to staff recommendation;
-amending safety standard d) to read: $100,000
liability insurance to cover any property damages
created by structural failure.
-excluding condition E) Conditional use permit to be
renewed in 5 years to assure structural stabi 1 i.ty of
tower structure is maintained. Reason being the City
code does not mandate it.
-obtain acknowledgement form confirming most
affected neighbor has been made aware of the
proposal.
Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
# 1088 DALE J . 14CCURDY
4041 U10RSH SHORE DRIVE
VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING 9:17 - 9:22
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Mr. & Mrs. Dale McCurdy were present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the
request to construct a detached 2-car garage will
increase the hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone from
existing 24.6 % to 28.6 % requiring a 3.6 % variance. He
noted that the property has an extremely steep driveway
leading down to the house, with an existing 1-car
detached garage near the road at the top of the
dri veway. Given the steep slopes and the City sewer
lines, staff feels there is an obvious hardship in
constructing a garage on the property and recommends
approval as proposed, conditioned upon removal of the
approximately 250 s.f. of plastic-%heeting under
existing groundcover west of the house, and subject to
applicant granting the City the appropriate sewer
easements.
No one wa,r. present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
Taylor asked if the invent was to have two garages.
9
MINUTES OF THB PUNNING CONKISSION METING HELD NOVF24BER 17 , 1986
#1088 MCCURDY CONTINUED
Applicant stated they needed the existing garage for
winter use because they cannot get up or down the
driveway during the winter.
Bellows stated that the only other feasible alternative
would be an over/under type of garage which is very
expensive and which she felt. the City could not ask of
the applicant,
Goetten stated that the existing garage should be
acknowledged as a non -conforming use and be allowed to
remain.
It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Goetten, to
recommend approval of the hardcover variance subject to
staff recommendation and recognizing the existing garage
as a non -conforming structure. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
#1089 Re HUNT GREENE
865 PARTENWOOD ROAD
VARIAM CE
PUBLIC HBI�RING 9:29 - 9:35
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Hunt Greene was present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the
request for a hardcover variance and lakeshore setback
variances to construct two separate additions to the
existing residence:
1) A two-story addition to enlarge the existing
kitchen and master_ bedroom, to be located 42' from
the shoreline of Stubbs Bay, or extending about 6'
closer to the shoreline than the existing house.
2) A 101x10' sunroom, I. -story at ground level at the
midpoint of the house on the north side - this would
be about 60' from the shoreline.
Existing hardcover in the 0-75' is 11.0%, proposed
hardcover is 11.6%. No proposed hardcover changes in the
75-250' area. Gaffron noted that this property was
granted a variance in 1983 for a garage addition, which
would have increased the 0-75' hardcover to 12.3%,
however the garage was never built. Applicant is
willing to eliminate the graveled parking area west of
the house which would reduce the hardcover up to 800
s.f., resulting in an overall decrease of hardcover in
the 0-75' to 9.9%. It was noted that this property has
lakeshore on 3 sides of the property.
10
MINUTES OF THIS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17 , 1986
#1089 GREENE CONTINUED
Mr. .7reene showed photos of the existing kitchen and
master bedroom indicating the need for additional space
and noted that the addition will not obstruct any views.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Goetten,
recommend approval subject to removal of 500 s.f. of
non-structural hardcover (gravel parking area) resulting
in a net decrease in hardcover. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
#1095 CITY OF ORONO
2345 BLAINE AVENUE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PUBLIC HEARIiw 10:47 - 10:48
The Affidavit
was noted.
of Publication and Certificate of Mail ing
This is a request for a conditional use permit for the
installation of an emergency preparedness siren at the
Municipal Water Plat. site.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and ;.he public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Taylor, to
recommend approval of the conditional use permit for the
proposed weather siren, subject to the structure being
located 50' from the nearest residential lot line per
the proposed site plan. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
#1091/#1092 SAILORS WORLD INC.
1950 AND 1960 SHORELINE DRIVE
SKETCH PLAN REVIEW
John Vogt was present for this matter. Also present was
Charlie Stone representing three different parties
interested in buying tf�e rroperty.
These applications involve the expansion of Sailors
World marina to the west side of County Road 15 as
follows:
##1091, 1950 Shoreline Drive - Applicant plans to
raze the existing residential strilctures and install
a parking lot.
##1092, 1960 Shoreline Drive - Applicant plans to
terminate the transmission repair/gas sales use of
property for sales and boat service operation of
Sailors World.
11
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVE!lBER 17 , 1986
#1091/#1092 SAILORS WORLD INC. CONTINUED
Mr. Stone stated that they are not planning to expand
Sailors world, merely spread it out over a larger area,
possibly separating the sales & service from the boat
dock. rental.
Mary Crear, 1980 Spates Avenue, adjacent neighbor, was
present for this matter. She stated that they are
pleased with Sailors World as neighbors. She added,
speaking on behalf of M;. Tourangeau, 2060 Spates Ave.,
Mr. Tourangeau does not have any problem with the
proposed parking lot but requests that there be a 6-8'
grass area between his property and parking lot and also
some type of natural buffer from his property. Mrs.
Crear stated she had concerns regarding the use of the
parking lot, she was opposed to large boats being parked
which would further obstruct their view of the lake.
They are ameniable to orderly winter storage of new
average sized boats. She is also concerned about the
disposition of the existing gas tanks.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated for the record, that
the City by encouraged Sailors World to use the City lot
on weekends for overflow parking.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that the Planning
Commission should address the following issues:
1. Effects of rezoning properties to B-2.
2. Distinguish between a legal land use for each
property.
a) 1950 Shoreline Drive would require a zoning
amendment if property is not zoned to B- 2 for
parking lot use.
b) 1960 Shoreline Dr., applicant must prove to
City that a proposed chan^e in use would be less
a ntense than current use level.
Goetten stated that she would be willing to conceptually
approve the continued non --conforming use rather than
rezone.
Chairman Kelley stated that he
would
be opposed
to
permanent storage of boats any
time of
the year,
he
woL ld like to keep an open area.
He felt
boat parking
should be restricted to one only.
He also
felt that
if
the retail space was moved to the other
side of County
Rd. 15, an equal square footage of
structure
be
eliminated on the other side in
order
to prevent the
intensification of operation.
Bellows stated that she felt a marina was a very
appropriate use for lakeshore and in particular this
piece of property.
12
HINU OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 171 1986
# 10 91/# 10 9 2 SAILORS WORLD Inc. CORTINUND
Goet.ten stated that she would like to see a survey of
Sailors World as it presently exists with structures and
uses designated.
Chairman Kelley stated that he felt the gas use should
cease and gas tanks removed.
After discussion, Planning Commission unanimously agreed
conceptually that this is a better use of the property
than presently exist:, .
Zoning Administrator Mabusth advised applicants that the
next step would be submitting a formal comprehensive
plan application following a zoning amendment request
initiated by the City.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved by Goettei. , seconded by Bellows, t approve
the Minutes of the October 20, 1986 Planning Commission
meeting as submi�ted. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
PLMMING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE
Chairman Kelley was appointed to attend the December 8,
1986 Council meeting.
AD�JOU T 11: 0 3 P .1K .
The Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 11:03 P.M.
13