HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-18-1986 Planning MinutesPLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MONDAY, AUGUST 18, 1986 7 : 3 0 Pe Me
1275 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - COUNCIL CERMBERS
COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - Tom Frahm
ACTION ITEMS
1. #1039 Wm J. Ulrich, 1595 Bohns Point Rc:-d -
Conditional Use Permit/Variance
2. #1056 alai Hanson, 1390 Railroad Avenue -
Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing
3. #1046 Douglas J. Zumbusch, 1535 Long Lake Blvd. -
Conditional Use Permit - Continuation of Public Hearing
4. #1048/1049 Washington Scientific, Inc., 2605 Wayzata -
Commercial Site Plan Variance,y Blvd.
Conditional Use Permit -
Continuation of Public Hearing
5. #1063 Washington Scientific, Inc., 2605 Wayzata Blvd. -
Variance - Public Hearin y
g
6. #1059 Margaret Bjork, 2259 Shadywood Road -
Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing
7. #1060 J. F. Fleischhacker, 2775 Shadywood Road --
Variance - Public Hearing
8. #1061 Larry and Linda Cook, 3765 Watertown Road -
Variance - Public Hearing
9. #1062 Ingeborg Cici, 875 Wayzata Blvd. -
Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing
10. #1064 City of Orono, Spates Avenue Right -of -Way-
After -the -Fact Conditional Use Permit
mit & Variance -
Public Hearing
11. Zoning Amendment - Allow attached dwellings with PRD Deve
lopment
elopment
- Continuation of Public Hearing
ADDITIONAL ITEMS
12. Planning Commission approval of July 21, 1986 Minutes,
13. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend
September 8, 1986 Council Meeting,
the
ADJOURNMENT
MI NUTFS OF THE PIANN I NG COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18 , 1986
ATTENDANCE 7:30 P.M.
The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with
the following members present: Chairman Kelley, Bellows,
Rovegnc, Goetten, McDonald, and Hanson. Taylor was
Absen*. The following represented the City staff:
Building & coning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant
Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder
Peterson. Also present were Councilmember Frahm and
Consulting Engineer Mike Lynch.
#1039 WIC. J ULRICH
1595 BOHN ' S POINT ROAD
CONDITIONAL USE PER, MIT/VARIANCE
SE�REVIEW 9 :15 - 10 : 0 9
Applicant's Attorney Tom Humphrey introduced the
following people present for this matter:
John Noble, Project Director; Mark Gron her q,
Surveyor; Cliff Reep, Independant Shore -line
Consultant; George Shoppie, Master Plumber &
Engineer; Dean Buendorf, Vice President of Terra -
Therm Inc. the manufacturer and distributer of the
proposed geothermal heating/cooling system.
Based on concerns raised at the last Planning
Commission meeting, Mr. Humphrey noted that the following
conclusions can be made from the supportive data:
1. The well will not have a significant impact on
other wells in the area nor on the water table.
2. There wi 1 1 not be any de-icing of fect on Lake
Minnetonka as a resli 1 t of either the velocity or
temperature of water discharged.
3. Because the discharge pipe is on the bottom of
the lagoon, there will be no navigational hazard to
traffic on Lake Minnetonka.
4. Because it is a closed system there will be no
pollution hazard.
Mr. Humphrey noted that this system which the applicant
has chosen to use is a permitted system. Addressing the
hardship involved with the location of discharge pipe in
the lagoon vs. the wetland area, he stated that if the
pipe were discharged in the wetland area, there would be
a chance of the pipe freezing making the system
inoperable.
Mr. Humphrey reviewed the other agencies approval as
follows:
DNR - They have issued the well permit that has
permitted the installation of the well and also the
use of the water for heating and cooling.
Dept.
of
Fisheries
-
They find no
harmful effects
from
the
water discharged
into the
lagoon,
J
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986
# 10 3 9 ULRICH CONT t NUED
Pollution Control Agency - Applications on this
level of usage are being permitted and monitored.
LMCD - Concerned regarding the possibility of a de-
icing effect. They have the authority to prohibit
the use of this system if it causes a de-icing
effect..
Dean Buendorf of Terra -Therm stated that they have
installed over 1800 systems in Minnesota. He noted that
they are basically for residential use but have also
installed for commercial operations. He noted that
there was a similar system currently in operation on
Bald Eagle I a k in White Bear Lake. He stated that that
system has not- --r eated a de-icing effect.
Planning Commis:: on recommended that staff contact the
owner of the system in White Bear Lake for more
understanding of this system.
George Shoppie state) that. based on his experience and
his research calculation, he stated the discharge pipe
will not create a de -.icing effect.
Bellows
asked
him
if the
the discharge
pipe might
prevent
the ice
from
forming
in the
first place.
Mr. Shoppie stated no because th'e freezing action is
greater than the thawing action of system and during the
time of year when the ice is freezing, the system is not
operating at full capacity.
Rovegno
questioned
the
validity
of a linear equal
velocity
over the entire
20'
of pipe.
Mr.
Shoppie
stated
facts that
the
pressure
would
1)e equal.
supported his finding that
City Consulting Engineer Mike Lynch supported Mr.
Shoppie in his finding stating t.l.at the di f fPrence would
be negligable .
McDonald expressed concerns with setting a precedent by
allowing this type of system and the impact on the lake
if many of these systems were installed.
Addressing
McDona ld's
concern,
Cliff Reep stated that
there would
be 1 it t 1 e
impact on
the lake level due to
evaporation
and contol
by the Gray's
Bay Dam.
E
HINUTNS OF THE PLANNING COlrlKI SS ION IKEETI NG HELD AUGUST 18 1986
#1039 ULRICB CONTINUED
Goetten stated that
Freshwater Biological
system,
she would
like input
from
the
Institute
regarding this
type
of
Chairman Kelley stated that if the system is approved,
he wc;uld like the City to review the system p
on a yearly
basis in the winter months to check on the ice issue.
Rovegno recommended that erosion control conditions be
included if the system is approved.
Hanson stated that he had no problems with the system
and felt comfortable due to a 11 the regulatory agencies
involved.
Counci lmember Frahm stated that he also would like
comments from the FWBI on this system.
McDonald voiced concerns regarding the aquifer and
running out of water.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Rovegno, to
recommend approval of the conditional use
permit/variance for construction of a pipe within 75' of
the lake, subject to the following conditions:
1. City be allowed to review the operations of the
system for a period of 5 years on a yearly basis.
2. City receive favorable written documentation from
the FWBI on their opinion regarding the effects on
the lake and aquafer.
3. City will close the operation if the system
causes any de- a_ cing effect.
4. Appropriate erosion control measures be taken
during construction of the pipe and at tl'.e entrance
of the lagoon .
Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 3. Goetten, Bellows, and McDonald
voted nay,
Goetten stated
that she
felt this
matter should be
tabled until the
information
from FWBI
is received.
Bellows stated that although she is for this type of
system, she feels there is a problem with no basis of a
hardship to support the request.
Chairman Kelley stated that the issue before them and
the intent of the code is to protect the hardcover
within the 0-75' zone and by digging a hole, placing a
pipe and refilling the hole back to its original state
will not increase the hardcover..
3
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986
#1039 ULRICH CONTINUED
McDonald stated that two precedents would be set being
1) allowing the system without proof of hardship; 2 )
opening up this type of system being allowed owe Y g a d for
everybody, of which impact concerns her.
Goetten stated that she agreed with McDonald, she is
concerned about the aquifer. She noted that she feels
there has been enough variances, conditional use
permits, land alterations etc. on this property and she
refuses to grant anything else.
# 10 5 6 OLA I HANSON
1390 RAILROAD AVENUE
VARIANCE
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC
olai
HEARING 7:34 - 7:50
Hanson was present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the
conf licting surveys. He submitted the survey which
staff feels they are bound to accept as the correct
survey from Mr. Hanson. This survey shows the Golden
garage over onto Hanson's property.
Frances Golden was present for this matter and stated
that he protests this application and still maintains
that his :purvey dated in 1950 should be honored due to
the statute of limitations.
Chairman Kelley stated that the Planning Commission must
act on staf f's recommendation of the correct survey and
if Mr. Golden does not agree with their recommendation,
he should get his facts in order and submit them to the
City Council and City Attorney.
Mrs.
Golden stated
that they
felt the proposed garage
would
be detrimental
to their
garden.
Rovegno suggested that the Planning Commission eliminate
discussion on which survey is correct and act on a
reasonable compromise location i.e. 7' from "Lot line
rather than the proposed 4' from lot line.
Mr. Hanson stated that. to move the garage over to the
10' setback line would create a problem with maneuvering
the car into the garage and spoil the backyard.
Bellows stated that she agreed with applicants reasons
on the garage location.
Chairman Kelley asked why the
4' to the south.
2
garage could not be placed
MINUTES OF THE P"A"ING COMUSSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18 , 1986
# 10 5 6 HANSON CONTINUED
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the
only re -3son he found for not moving the garage back 4'
would be creating a sharper angle required to enter and
exit the garage.
Chairman Kelley noted that the turnaround would
accomodate that problem.
There were
no other
comments from
the
public regarding
this matter
and the
public hearing
was
closed.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley,
seconded
recommend
denial of the
4'
setback
requested.
Motion, Ayes
4,
Nays 2.
McDonald voted nay. McDonald
stating
should be allowed
to revise
his request
line before
denial*
# 10 46 DOUGLAS J . ZUnnUSCH
1535 LONG LAGS BOULEVARD
CONDITIONAL USE PHRMIT
d by Goetten, to
variance as
Bellows and
that applicant
to 7' from lot
%-UNTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:52 - 7:57
Douglas J. Zumbusch and his landscaper, Robert LaFa vor,
were present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that staff
has located a least 3 of the drainfields and anticipate
no problems as far as disruption of septic system.
Applicant has had a survey done but they have not
received a hard copy as yet. He stated that Mr. La Favor
indicates that the stairs and landings will be
constructed with pervious non -hardcover platforms in
order to decrease the amount of hardcover.
Mr. LaFa vor submitted photos of the proposed steps and
landings contructed of timbers with inlaid rock with
fiber mat underneath.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Goetten, seconded by McDonald, to
recommend approval per staff recommendation amending
condition #3 to state that the stairs and landings will
be lined with geotechnica 1. material... Motion, Ayes 6,
Nays 0 ,
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986
#1063 TiiASHINGTON SCIENTIFIC, INC.
2605 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
VARIAME
PUBLIC HEARING 7:58 - 8:07
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was ncted.
Representing Washington Scientific, Inc. were Joseph
Pallansch and Mike Unger.
As required, applicant requests a variance to the Hwy.
12 Moratorium so that they may proceed on applications
#1048 & #1049.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the WSI
property has never been considered for rezoning within
the Hwy. 12 Study. She noted that during the study they
have considered an access corridor to the new industrial
complex adjacent to the east. She stated that staff and
applicant have agreed to a 60'easement adjacent to Hwy.
12 for the proposed road.
Bellows noted that the proposed road within the study
has little effect relative to the location of the
proposed building.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to
recommend approval of the variance to the Moratorium
Ordinance 13, Second Series. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
#1048/#1049 WASHINGTON SCIENTIFIC, INC.
2605 WAYZATA BOULxvARD
CONKERCIAL S I TB PLAN/VARIANCE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 8 : 0 8 - 8 :13
Representing Washington Scientific, Inc. were Joseph
Pollansch and Mike Unger,
Chairman Kelley noted that. WSI has met all the
appropriate agency requirements of storing chemicals.
He reminded the applicant that his concern from the last
meeting wa resolving the sprinkling of the main
building.
Mike Unger stated that the rates of fire insurance has
prompted them to recommend to the WSI Board, at their
August 27th Board meeting, that they sprinkle the
building before January 1. 1987.
Go
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18 1986
#1048/#1049 WASHINGTON SCIENTIFIC CONTINUED
Regarding the application for a variance and conditional
use permit to construct the building, Mr. Unger stated
that the building is needed due to a PCA inspection
requiring adequate storage for their chemicals,p
There were
no other
comments from
the
public regarding
i n
g g
this matter
and the
Public
Hearing
was
closed.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by McDonald,
to recommend approval per staff recommendation subject
t^ WSI submitting a statement from the Board Meeting
approving the installation of a sprinkling system prior
to the September 8th Council meeting when the Council
will review this application. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
#1059 NARGARRT WORK
2259 SHADYWOOD ROAD
CONDITIONLAL USE PERMIT
PUBLIC HEMI NG 8 :14 - 8 : 3 7
The Affidavit
was noted.
of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
Representing the applicant were Don Bjork, applicant's
son, and their real estate agent, Ruthanne Lang.
Applicant requests a conditional use permit to permit
the property at 2259 Shadywood Road to be used as 2
residential units (duplex) in light of the unique
history of use of the property. Applicant q
Y Pp wishes to
sell this property as she can no longer maintain it.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed the floor plan
separate which indicate that their are two se '
p living units
with separate entries. She noted that the two building
permits dated in 1976 and 1980 which were o
issued to
remodel the house for a mother-in-law apartment both
specifically note that it is not to be used as a duplex
or for rental income. Today, it is obviously being used
a duplex use.
Don B jork explained the history of the property and
the change of his families circumstances. He noted how
his family had improved the property. He stated that
this house is definitely now a duplex, which the City
help to create, and there is a hardship
being they
cannot sell the property unless it is granted a duplex
use by the City. He asks that. the City realize what is
actually there and help them with this bad situation.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that staff finds no
way to make this property a legal non -conforming use.
6
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18 , 1986
#1059 WORK CONTINUED
Bellows stated that she had sympathy with the Bjork
family however she failed to find a hardship involved
other than financial. She feels that this property
could be sold with a mother-in-law apartment.
Goetten noted that the city is looking at an amendment
regarding duplex use. She also noted the fact that
this property has been assessed 2 sewer and 2 water
units.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the property
has only 1 meter.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to
recommend denial of the use of this structure as a
duplex unit based on the fact that the owners have been
on notice for the last ten years that this is not to be
used as a rental or duplex unit. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays
2. Goetten and Hanson voted nay stating that staff
should review possible legal remedies that may be
available.
Applicant was advised to work with staff on this problem
before being heard by the Council.
# 10 6 0 J e F e FLE I SCHHACKER
2775 SHADYWOOD ROAD
VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING 8:40 - 8:50
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Mr. Fleischhacker was present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explaing the
request for hardcover, average lakeshore setback, and
structure in 0-75' setback zone variances to construct a
two -level deck in order to gain access from their upper
floor level to the rear yard without blocking any
windows. Per his memo, applicant proposes to have a
non -hardcover surface underneath deck and shrubbery
screens the proposed deck from the most affected
neighbor.
Bellows stated that she felt there were ways to
construct the stairway with less enfringement in the 75'
setback area.
1
MINUTES OF TSB PI.RMING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18 , 1986
# 106 0 FI.BISCURMlC1CI�R COIf�I�iUED
Chairman Kelley stated that he did not feel the average
lakeshore setback was an issue because of the screening
by shrubbery but would rather the deck be constructed to
stay behind the 75' line as much as possible.
Based on Planning Commission's comments, Mr.
Fleischhacker would like this matter tabled so he can
come up with another plan to submit at the October
Planning Commission meeting.
It was moved by McDor.,t- veconded by Hanson, to table
this application un:-. the October meeting giving
applicant direction to scale the deck back as much as
possible. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
# 10 61 LAMY AND LI NDA COOK
3765 WATgR-immN ROAD
VARIANCE
PUBLIC HERRING 8:57 - 9:05
The Affidavit
was noted.
of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
Larry and Linda Cook were present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning
Administrator Gaffron
explained
the
request f or a
s ide setback variance
to a 1
low
construction of a
20'x30' horse barn to
be located
10'
from the east lot
line. The property to
the east is
the
Butterfield Greenhouses,
Chairman Kelley asked applicant why the barn is proposed
to be located near the east lot line rather than
centered on the property, where an 80-90' setback from
both side lot lines is possible, and asked what are the
the hardships involved.
Mr. Cook stated that regardless of where they place the
barn a variance is requires and based on this, they
would like to preserve the continuity of the property to
provide room for a pasture and riding ring. They
proposed a 3 stall barn.
Bellows stated that this is an extremely difficult piece
of property and very definite 1t., a rural area and she
would rather have the barn be built closer to the
greenhouse property, which is a commercial use, than
center it on the property.
Rovegno stated that he felt it should at least comply
with setback requirements for a principal structure,
which is 50' from lot line.
X
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986
#1061 COOK CONTINUED
It was noted that there has not been any objection from
the affected neighbor Butterf ie lds. Applicant was
advised to obtain written approval for the city records.
No one was pre:,ent from the public regarding this matter
and the public nearing was closed.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Rovegno, to
recommend approval of a variance to construct a barn 50'
from the east lot line. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
# 106 2 IRG CICI
875 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT i
COMMC IAL S I TB PLAN REVIEW
PUBLIC HEARING 8 : 0 6 - 8 :15
The Affidavit
was noted.
of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
Ingeborg Cici was present for this matter. Also present
were P.M. Cici, Christine Cici, and Peter H. Watson,
applicant's attorney.
Pastor ::hi tesel l of the Vineyard of the Lake Church was
also present for this matter and stated that he feels
the applicants are good tenants and the proposal. would
be a good use of the property.
Attorney Watson stated that they have reviewed staff's
memo and recommendation and find no problems. He asked
if the Planning Commission %-.uuld consider this
application and make their recommendation at this
meeting so that the sale of the property, which is
contingent upon approval of their plan by the city, will
not be delayed.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that an additional
problem was brought to her attention today, being that
staf f has been asked to review the access issue with the
City of Wayzata and the State Highway Dept. reason being
moving the access for safety concerns. 7n addition to
the access issue being resolved, it was noted that the
septic system information, signage plans, and response
from the City Engineer regarding drainage plans have not
been received, therefore, staff recommends that this
application be tabled pending this it 4 ormation.
Bellows noted that she would like to see a rf i ssessment
of the number of fire exits.
Applicants noted that the proposed plan is just a rough
plan and that they fully intend to comply with the
licensing requirements for day care facilities.
1.0
KIVUSBS OF THE PLAY'NING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18 , 1986
# 10 6 2 CICI CONTINUED
Rovegno qu,--:�stioned the need for a 30' wide access as
recommended by Chief Kilbo.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Goetten, to
table this application pending additional information.
Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
#1064 CITY OF ORONO
SPATES AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY
AFTER-T CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING 10:10 - 10:37
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Rovegno retired his Planning Commission seat because he
is an abutting property owner to this application and
wished to testify opposition in this matter.
As noted in his memo, Assistant Zoning Administrator
Gaffron explained that the City was remiss ir, nct making
a formal application for conditional use permit for the
Crystal Bay Lift station which was pointed out to staff
after -the -fact. He noted that this code section has been
in the Zoning code since at least 1968, but staff finds
no record of any previous formal applications by the
City for the many other lift stations constructed since
that time and that it appears to have been the standard
past procedure to approve the lift stations as part of
the public hearing review process for overall sewer
projects. He explained that the code section includes a
standard of 50' setback from any residential lot line
for service structures and he noted that this code
section makes it virtually impossible to locate a lift
station within any residential zone in Orono.
George Rovegno, 2010 Shoreline Drive, stated that the
original location for the lift station was proposed to
be on his property in which he found problems with and
through his attorney had the location changed. He noted
that he brought the issue of the required conditional
use permit to Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson last
December and also told him to contact Dan Crear
regarding the new proposed location of the lift station.
He stated that he would like to add further a formal
complaint that the City requires variances for the
additional hardcover placed within the 0-75' setback
area. He stated that there was no hardship involved in
the placement of this lift station and submits that the
City has the absolute ability to place the lift station
anywhere they wish and to condemn whatever land is
required for placement. He noted the problem with the
gas station property abutting the lift station which i s
11
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18• 1986
# 10 6 4 CITY OF ORONO CONTINUED
questionably legal b,�c-ause the operation did interrupt
for more than 12 mol,ths after it became a l p
legal non -
conform ng use. Ht: stated that is a bad use of the
property that has riot been operated according to its
conditional use permit and the City has consistent)
refused to force the operator to correctproblems
the y
.
He submits that the appropriate answer to the lift
station wou.l d have been for the City to condemn the
entire property because the yard cannot be reduced in a
substandard lot, to tear down gas tation and remove a l l
that hardcover, and place the lift station more than 50'
from the Crear residence and other properties. He
stated that every lift station that does not meet the
code conditions should be subject to an application and
should be denied or granted on its own merits, not
because its already there noting that the only issue of
replacement is financial which is not a valid hardship.
He further stated that he felt the process in which the
City followed in placement of the lift station was
deceptive a?,d ,.-Nt in the open.
Dan Crear, 1980 Spates Ave., stated that the City has
been negligent in notifying him regarding the placement
of the lift station and other matters such as the recent
blacktop on his property to solve a drainage problem.
He stated that the lift station was so visibly close
(15' from property line, 401 from house) to his house
and interferes with his already limited view of the lake
and that he is opposed to any more decoration of the
lift station. He noted that the sewer and lift station
issue has affected him considerably because he is not
able to sell his house for a reasonable amount in
addition to problems involving the actual hookup from
his house to sewer.
La Dean McWilliams, 1 130 Wi 1 low Drive, noted that it
costs the Crystal Bay residents an additional $5, 000 to
change the location of the lift station from Rovegrio's
property to the present 1 oca+ ion, and that the City
approved this without a public hearing,
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed,
McDonald asked if is was possible to relocate the lift
station up on the City office property.
Consulting Engineer Mike Lynch stated it would require
another lift station noting issues of the extreme depth
of the existing gravity sewer.
12
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMI S S I Old MEETING HSLD AUGUST 18 , 1986
# 106 4 CITY OF ORONO CONTINUED
Chairman Kelley stated that based on the testimony given
tonight that the City has acted flagrantly in this
matter and that this problem shou ].d be forwarded to the
Council. Therefore, it was moved by Chairman Kelley,
seconded by Goetten, to deny the after--the-fact
conditional use permit. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
ZONING !ENT
ATTAC88D D NJ6LINGS WITH PRD DEVELOPE)ONT
CONTINUATIOBI OF PUBLIC HEARING
Planning Commission tabled this matter at this time.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to
approve the Minutes from the July 21, 1986 Planning
Commission meeting. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
COUNCIL MEETING REPRESENTATIVE
Planning Commission member Rovegno was appointed to
attend the September 8, 1986 Council meeting.
ADJOURNMENT 10 : 40 P.M.
It was moved
adjourn the
Motion, Ayes
by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to
Planning Commission meeting at 10:40 P.M.
6, Nays 0.
13