Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-19-2022 Planning Commission Packet Agenda Planning Commission Meeting Monday, September 19, 2022, 6:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers,2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 `4kfsHo0' 952-249-4600/www.ci.orono.mn.us Audience Members: Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available on the City website (www.ci.orono.mn.us) in Agendas Minutes & Videos and in the Public Packet—located in the lobby near the entrance. Applicants will be asked to move to the lectern to answer questions after staff presents the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda, they will be scheduled for an upcoming City Council meeting. A quorum of the City Council may be in attendance of a Planning Commission meeting to hear comments made, though no action or deliberation of the Council will occur. Council Representative: Aaron Printup Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Agenda Approval of Minutes: August 15, 2022 Public Hearings: 1. LA22-000036 Scott Gates, 2815 Casco Point Road, requests hardcover, average lakeshore setback, and side yard setback variances to permit a lakeside deck and roof changes. (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 2. LA22-000043 Sanja deGarmo, 2675 Fox Street, requests a front yard setback variance in order to construct a garage addition to the existing home. (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 3. LA22-000045 Addilay Homes & Remodeling, LLC -Scott Johnson, 1153 Elmwood Avenue, requests side yard and street yard setback variances for a home addition. (Staff: Laura Oakden) 4. LA22-000046 Eskuche Design, 3345 Fox Street, requests a conditional use permit for a guest house use. (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 5. LA22-000048 Text Amendment related to maximum accessory building height within RR-1A and RR-1 B rural zoning districts. (Staff: Laura Oakden) Other Business: 6. Update on September 12, 2022 City Council meeting Adjourn Planning Commission Liaison to Monday, October 10, 2022 City Council meeting: Jon Ressler Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us—follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,August 15,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Chair Mark McCutcheon,Commissioners Scott Kirchner,Bob Erickson,and alternates Dave Peterson and Gary Kraemer(arrived at 7:03 p.m.). Commissioners Chris Bollis,Jon Ressler,Dennis Libby, and Matt Gettman were absent.Representing Staff were Community Development Director Laura Oakden, City Planner Melanie Curtis. Chair McCutcheon called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.,followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chair McCutcheon received word before the meeting that Mr.Nygard would like two minutes to make public comments and asked if there is a motion to add it. Kirchner is not in favor. McCutcheon noted it is not common for the Planning Commission to hold public comments. Libby moved,Bollis seconded,to approve the Agenda as submitted.VOTE:Ayes 4, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 12,2022 Kirchner moved,Erickson seconded,to approve the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission meeting of July 12,2022.VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 0. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. LA22-000032 PETIT DESIGN,3349 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD,REQUESTS SETBACK AND HARDCOVER VARIANCES FOR A HOUSE AND DECK ADDITION ON THE LAKESIDE OF THE HOME.(STAFF: LAURA OAKDEN) Barry Petit,on behalf of the Applicant,was present. Community Development Director Oakden gave a presentation on the item, stating the Applicant proposes a remodel project with the inclusion of a second floor cantilever addition at roughly 34 square feet to the front of the home. They are also requesting 20 square feet of a deck addition to the front of the home which is located within the 75 foot setback. The project maintains the current hardcover at 43%but they are changing the nature from at-grade to structural. The lot is substandard with respect to lot area and lot width and currently has building and hardcover encroachments within the setback. Staff recommends reducing the overall hardcover of the property as part of the request.The property owner received a variance in 2015 for the second floor cantilever and bathroom addition but they did not pull a building permit for the project and it has since expire d. Tonight the Applicant is looking to request the same variance for the same 2015 plans. Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds that there are practical difficulties in the lot's size,width,and the configuration of the existing home and access to Crystal Bay Road being completely within the 75' lake yard to support Applicants' request for the proposed variances. Planning Staff recommends approval of variances as requested as they are supported by practical difficulties. Page 1 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,August 15,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. Chair McCutcheon opened the public hearing at 6:09 p.m. Chair McCutcheon closed the public hearing at 6:09 p.m. Chair McCutcheon noted this area of Orono comes up a lot with narrow lots and second story additions are pretty typical. Kirchner agreed with the no net increase or decrease in hardcover and thinks practical difficulties are established by the 13 foot deep building path on the lot based on setbacks and the 75 foot lakeyard setback. Kraemer agrees with Kirchner. Kirchner moved,Kraemer seconded,to approve LA22-000032,3349 Crystal Bay Road,Variances. VOTE: Ayes: 5,Nays 0. 2. LA22-000037 612 SIGNS, 1444 SHORELINE DRIVE,REQUESTS A SETBACK VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A NEW MONUMENT SIGN.(STAFF: LAURA OAKDEN) William Salvador,on behalf of the Applicant,was present. Ms. Oakden gave a presentation on the item,noting the Applicant is requesting a zero foot street setback for a monument sign.The Applicant is requesting approval of a setback variance to permit construction of a 9' x 1.4'monument sign that will be 7.3 feet tall.The property currently has an eight foot wide sign installed on two 4"x 4"posts, located between the building and the pavement of County Road 15.The existing sign encroaches into the right-of-way. The existing sign is located over a utility easement and the new monument sign is also proposed to remain within the utility easement.The Applicant is proposing a zero foot setback from the right-of-way.A monument sign is required to have a 5 foot setback from all property lines.The proposed plan would remove the current sign encroaching into the right of way but the new sign would not meet the required 5 foot setback. Staff recommends any new improvements placed within the City utility easement be addressed with an encroachment agreement and an equal amount of hardcover reduced from the property to maintain existing levels.The Applicant has identified the substandard street yard due to the existing location of the business.The Applicant states the monument sign is necessary to increase visibility of the business to aid in reducing traffic hazards.The Applicants have provided supporting documentation regarding practical difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Staff finds that there are some practical difficulties in the lot configuration,with the location of the existing building challenging traffic sightlines. Staff also acknowledges that the proposal will resolve the existing right-of-way encroachment.However, the property has conforming locations for alternative placement of a monument sign. The proposed monument sign an accessory use of the property and the business is considered the primary use.The proposed zero foot setback for the sign is a convenience to the property owner and not a necessity for the primary use of the property.Ms. Oakden noted the engineer provided comments in the packet and no public comment was received. Staff finds there are conforming building locations that would meet the 5 foot setback requirement and finds that the proposed location is out of convenience.Any encroachment in the utility easement would require an encroachment agreement.Planning staff recommends denial of the proposed variance. Page 2 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,August 15,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. Kirchner asked which encroachment the proposal eliminates. Oakden replied the current sign encroaches into the right-of-way and the new sign is proposing a zero foot setback but would eliminate the right-of-way encroachment. However both signs would be located in the utility easement. McCutcheon asked about the details of the sign. Oakden replied the sign the monument signage will include the business name, a digital changeable signage area, and a faux stone base. William Salvador of 612 Signs spoke about the visibility which is important for safety and showed a photo on screen noting there have been 3 accidents this year and people cannot see the sign going eastbound. The new sign is a lot more visible and that the current sign does not represent Orono as it is two plastic posts and a panel. They would like to design something really beautiful with architectural stone and down-lighting at the entrance of the town. He does not know that they are married to having the sign at the edge but because there is an existing sign there Mr. Salvador recommended it. He noted they are taking something existing and ugly,bringing it closer to the building, and making it a foot shorter; it is the same size and same place but closer to the building,more visible and thus safer,and much prettier. Kirchner asked what the digital display would scroll. Mr. Salvador thinks it needs to be static;while it can change it needs to be a certain frequency.He cannot speak for the owner but thinks he would say it is not that important. What is important is that they just paid a ton of money to redo the siding and make it more beautiful and want to make the signage more beautiful.If a digital display makes it worse in terms of the Planning Commission's acceptance,Mr. Salvador thinks they would remove it. They are asking for their opinion and can make changes and he reiterated they are trying to make something prettier than the plastic posts there currently. Chair McCutcheon noted it is already known for being an accident area and they do not want to make more distractions which is why they are sensitive on the digital display. Mr. Salvador spoke about driving on the road near the curve and sightlines of the building,noting one does not see the current sign until they are in front of the business. People then hit the brakes to pull in and from the other direction people cannot see those pulling out or coming across until the last minute which is why there have been many accidents.He clarified the relevance of the sign's proportion as previously there was a longer name and all sorts of mumbo-jumbo.Now the sign displays the name "River Valley"in large letters so one can read it further out. McCutcheon asked if the current sign is being hit by snow plows as it is so close to the road. Mr. Salvador replied it has been there 20 years and noted the posts do not have marks on them. The new one will be about 30 inches further in. Oakden clarified it abuts roughly two feet into the right-of-way currently and showed the edge of the right-of-way and the edge of the pavement. She reached out to Public Works for comment and they did Page 3 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,August 15,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. not have any comments regarding the placement. The City Engineer replied regarding the encroachment agreement over the utility easement. Chair McCutcheon opened the public hearing at 6:29 p.m. Chair McCutcheon closed the public hearing at 6:29 p.m. McCutcheon stated they are improving the sign by getting closer to the building but the fact remains it does not meet the five foot setback. He asked if the Commissioners are okay with it due to the fact that the previous sign was there or whether they want the Applicant to push it back and meet the setback. Erickson is pleased to see the encroachment into the right-of-way will be eliminated.He also noticed that it will be above the utility easement but noted the engineer comment and review that the proposed sign would not interfere with the sewer line and recommends an encroachment agreement.He said any motion should include the condition on acceptance of Exhibit F.With that,Erickson would not see any problem with this. Peterson viewed the site this weekend and noted it is a very hazardous intersection. He missed the number on the way past and had to turn around to come back noting one needs to pay attention. He encourages adequate signage that brings the message to people and if the Commission does not like this sign they should help guide the Applicant to a different sign. McCutcheon stated that is correct,if one is buying a boat and has never been on this unfamiliar road and is trying to find the business,they do not need anyone hitting their breaks in that area.He understands why a more bold and recognizable sign is needed. Kirchner understands the concept but does not like the digital display for the safety reasons cited as it is merely adding to the visual clutter as drivers proceed down the roadway. He also understands drawing more visibility to the business,however given there are opportunities to conform to City Code,he would like to see an application that conforms to the existing Code. He does not think it meets practical difficulties in this case and would not be in support of the variance. McCutcheon asked if there is a con to pushing the sign back. Mr. Salvador noted they thought about that but the problem is coming west going east, one does not see the sign until they are in front of the building and are at the point to pull in.He noted they could devise a pylon going vertically up with the name"River Valley"but the problem is that would be about 20 feet tall to write"River Valley"vertically. He stated finding an alternative if this does not work is the point. He thinks there might be a Code saying they cannot put a 20 foot vertical sign.He noted the issue is finding a place to put a sign that can be seen after one turns because the west side is not visible until one is in front of the walkway. Kraemer supports this and thinks it is a big improvement as the current sign is temporary-looking and the proposed sign is permanent looking. If the Applicant has the ability to do another temporary-looking sign he would rather see them do the more permanent-looking sign with the added improvement of getting out of the encroachment. He does not know enough about alternative locations but noted this is an improvement so he would be for this with the digital display removed. Page 4 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,August 15,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. McCutcheon noted the issue is coming from the freeway and trying to find the business and agreed it is an improvement.He appreciates the monument as it looks less temporary and more professional and bold. This is an opportunity to sharpen it up and get it out of the encroachment. Kirchner thinks it is worth noting it is still within the utility easement and he would argue the two plastic posts provide clearance underneath that is easier to worth through if maintenance needs to be done. They may end up destroying the sign in the event that utility work needs to be done within that easement. McCutcheon asked what the encroachment agreement would entail. Oakden replied standard encroachment agreements say something to the effect of one acknowledges they are putting an improvement in an easement space and it is at their own risk and liability should any utilities,maintenance,or damage occur through maintenance of that easement. Essentially it would be at the Applicants' risk. Erickson asked if they had discussion of a Code amendment regarding digital signs. Oakden replied they re-wrote the sign Code over the last five years,it was flushed out,amended,and the City does allow digital displays with a limit to size,brightness,and how fast the signs are. Mr. Salvador noted the base of the sign is urethane manufactured to look like stone which is super light and he said rather than putting two posts they could put one post at 6x6 on the left side and one post closer to the building so it is very removable, lightweight,and closer to the building to create an easier way for utilities to be serviced. Kirchner noted they must go with the application in front of them but Mr. Salvador has heard the feedback and can take that into account when they move the application to the City Council. McCutcheon summarized the Commissioners are not big fans of the digital display and the Applicant could consider the maintainability of the sign. Regarding the new situation and bettering the situation the Commissioners are in favor of that. Kirchner moved,Peterson seconded,to deny LA22-000037, 1444 Shoreline Drive setback variance. VOTE: Ayes: 3,Nays 2 (Erickson,Kraemer). Erickson commented on his vote,noting he tends to favor positive votes when possible and if it had been vote to approve subject to conditions he would have been in favor of voting for that. McCutcheon thinks the Applicant received the Commission's feedback and there are some minor adjustments to be made. 3. LA22-000039 BILL PETERS, 1950 CONCORDIA STREET,REQUESTS AN AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK VARIANCE TO RECONSTRUCT A DECK WITH AN EXPANDED FOOTPRINT. (STAFF: MELANIE CURTIS) William Peters,Applicant,was present. Page 5 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,August 15,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. City Planner Curtis gave a presentation on the item,noting the Applicants currently have an existing elevated deck on the south side of their home facing the lake(shown in yellow). The deck is a screened in half circle,with a patio below and a pergola above.Due to the location of the home to the east,the deck,a portion of the Applicants' home, is lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line. They wish to construct a new,rectangular deck with a reduced setback from the lake(shown in red). The new deck will be approximately 100 square feet larger than the existing.The existing circular deck is situated approximately 101 feet from the ordinary high water level(OHWL);the proposed deck will be 103 feet from the OHWL.Currently the deck encroaches into the required street setback from Fagerness Point Road;the new deck will resolve this encroachment.The existing deck is located approximately 27 feet lakeward of the Average Lakeshore Setback(ALS)and the new proposed deck will improve that setback by 2 feet. The affected property owner at 1945 Fagerness Point Road has provided comments on the Applicants' request and does not oppose the variance. Regarding practical difficulty, Staff concurs that the triangular shape adds to the challenge of development.The property is a corner lot,and the home on the property to the east determines the average lakeshore setback. The eastern neighboring home is situated closer to the lake than the Applicants' home resulting in challenges for lake side improvements of the home.Planning Staff recommends approval. William Peters 1950 Concordia Street, said when they bought the house they received a similar variance due to the triangular location and setback. Chair McCutcheon opened the public hearing at 6:52 p.m. Chair McCutcheon closed the public hearing at 6:52 p.m. Kraemer moved,Erickson seconded,to LA22-000039, 1950 Concordia Street,Variance.VOTE: Ayes: 5,Nays 0. 4. LA22-000040 KRIS MURPHY, 1971 FAGERNESS POINT ROAD,REQUESTS A 75' LAKE SETBACK VARIANCE TO RECONSTRUCT LAKESIDE RETAINING WALLS AND STAIRS.(STAFF: MELANIE CURTIS) Kris Murphy, on behalf of the Applicants,was present. Curtis gave a presentation on the item stating the subject property has an existing,failing timber wall and stair system.They plan to reconstruct all of the walls and stairs in the same location and setback from the lake.However, due to the change in wall materials from timber to boulders,the walls will have a larger footprint than existing.Additionally,the existing stair is narrow(ranging between 18"and 2.5 feet in width)and not very functional.They plan to install a 4 foot wide granite stair with a 12 square foot pea rock landing at the turn in its place.A setback variance is required for the new walls. The Applicant has identified the failing retaining wall,protection of the hillside and the need to provide reasonable access to the dock as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance.Additionally,they have provided supporting documentation regarding practical difficulties attached as Exhibit B,and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application.The existing timber retaining walls are made with narrow timbers which are tiered and support the hillside of the property.The existing landscape timbers are not well-suited to support the slope.The existing and proposed stair and wall configuration allow for the existing lake access.The new walls are proposed to utilize the existing footprint and will be constructed at the same setback from the lake.Retaining walls are not permitted within the 75 foot lakeshore setback and in order to replace the system, a setback variance has been requested.A building permit is required Page 6 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,August 15,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. and the City Engineer and Building Official will review the plans at the time of permit to determine if an engineering plan is required. Staff finds existing conditions of the failing retaining wall,substandard stairs, and vulnerable hillside are practical difficulties supporting this request. Staff recommends approval of the lake setback variance for the improvements as proposed. Staff further recommends additional screening of the walls be implemented to preserve the natural vegetated view from the lake where feasible. Curtis noted one slight change to the plans submitted earlier in the day and note the Applicant can answer questions regarding that. Kris Murphy,project manager from Backyard Reflections, stated no substantial trees will be removed. He spoke about the boulders and steps taking up more space than the timber wall and addition of vegetation to with deep root structure to help secure the hillside. Chair McCutcheon opened the public hearing at 7:02 p.m. Chair McCutcheon closed the public hearing at 7:02 p.m. McCutcheon thinks this is pretty minimal and the Applicant is just trying to get to the lake which is their right. Kirchner and Kraemer agreed. Kraemer moved,Kirchner seconded,to approve LA22-000040, 1971 Fagerness Point Road, Variance.VOTE: Ayes: 5,Nays 0. 5. LA22-000041 ESKUCHE DESIGN,3005 CASCO POINT ROAD,REQUESTS AN AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A NEW HOME.(STAFF: MELANIE CURTIS) The Applicants were present. The Applicant is proposing to redevelop the property with a new single family home.As part of the project the property owner plans to combine the subject property with a portion of the property to the north addressed 2987 Casco Point Road. Further they plan to combine the remaining half of 2987 Casco Point Road with the"tennis court lot." The existing homes are planned to be removed. The Applicant has designed a new home for the newly enlarged property reflected in Exhibit D. For the purpose of this application the Planning Commission should treat the newly enlarged property as existing. If there are any approvals granted,they will be contingent upon completion of all the requirements to administratively move the lot lines. Due to the orientation of the property in relation to the neighboring homes and the curvature of the shoreline,the Applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance for the new home. The Applicant has provided supporting documentation regarding the applicable practical difficulties attached as Exhibit B,and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. The neighboring home is pushed back from the lake 210 feet due to a relatively narrow 50 foot lakeshore strip.The result is a large average lakeshore setback over the subject property. The proposed home has been designed to reduce the impact to the adjacent property owners' views of the lake from the existing condition. The Applicant is proposing to reduce the encroachment into the average lakeshore setback by 15 feet,and reorient the home to pull back from the lake and away from the neighboring lots in the average setback area. Comments have been received and are included in the packet.An additional comment was submitted today. Staff finds that the Applicant's choice to build a replacement home in the Page 7 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,August 15,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. proposed location is not supported by practical difficulty, although it slightly improves the lake views from the adjacent home from the existing condition.There is a conforming building envelope on the property to support the Applicant's proposed home footprint. Finding inadequate practical difficulties to support the request,Planning Staff recommends denial. Bob Heim, 3005 Casco Point Road,stated this was a three lot parcel and they decided to split it to two parcels based on feedback from the City and neighbors.Now they are trying to build homes that conform with the other homes so they are essentially in a line. Moving the house forward cuts down on the sightline of the neighbor's pool,although they could plant shrubs on the side to hide the pool.Neighbors on both sides agree with the plan. Michael Gorman,2987 Casco Point Road,noted they are trying to balance a consistent setback along what was formerly Lakeshore Avenue.This does require a variance based on where the homes are located but it was designed intentionally and showed the line of homes on screen. Sven Gustafson,general contractor, spoke about preserving the Goodwin's sightline. Chair McCutcheon opened the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. Dan Seidel,3015 Casco Point, supports the plan and thinks they put a lot of care and time into it.He stated the reason his house is in its current location is because they took care not to block the Hartswell house or to loom over the house next to them. The setback is improving on the house next to his as it is being moved back,and they have talked about not putting a forest in to preserve Mr. Seidel's lake view which he appreciates.He thinks they have a chance to line up the historic homes for the next 100 years. He asked about drainage across the street and wonders if pushing it back will affect those drainage issues. Mr. Seidel supports this plan and looks forward to having them as neighbors. Chair McCutcheon closed the public hearing at 7:17 p.m. McCutcheon appreciates the Applicant taking the feedback from 3 lots to 2 lots.He noted they put some thought into the plans in looking at drainage points,the neighbor's pool and respecting their privacy,and the uniformity of the look of the proposed house. Kraemer agrees it is a win-win and it is always great to see neighbor support. It improves things for everyone and gives more consistency to the neighborhood and it looks good. Erickson noted he may be biased as he started on a property with three homes on it and he tore down two so now there is one.He spoke about Staffs concerns, especially number 12 of the practical difficulties. He said when one has the option to build in a different location that conforms with Code, it then concludes the request is a convenience to the property owner rather than a practical difficulty. Erickson stated State law dictates standards for practical difficulty and if they cannot make that standard the law forbids the City and Council from approving it. Kirchner echoes Mr. Erickson and finds it difficult to identify practical difficulties with this application. He does not believe practical difficulties are established and would not support the application. Peterson suggested giving it back to the architect and making it conform to the guidelines. Page 8 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,August 15,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. Mr. Gustafson stated a lot of work has gone into the designing the location and form of the homes, especially to the south as they are concerned about the massing of the lake and south side of the home and do not want it to block their view or sunlight. Curtis added that pushing the house 210 feet back from the lake results in a condition that is out of the character on Casco as they do no typically have this great distance and the homes are closer to the lake. Therefore it would be out of character in this particular area but that is the conforming setback. Mr. Gorman noted they are trying to be transparent and stated this is the difference between practical difficulty and a practical result.The practical result that works best for the community and neighbors is consistent with what they have laid out.The question is whether they get there with one step or two steps. Mr. Gustafson thinks the flag lot itself is the practical difficulty and it is further from the lake than most every other home to the north of this property. In addition,in talking to City Staff there has been some head scratching as they have not seen many three lot combos with both homes being torn down and there isn't a lakeside setback established by existing homes. He suspects the uniqueness of the lot is part of the practical difficulty here. McCutcheon does not think this is egregious,the neighbors are in line, it seems like a win-win with less massing.Regarding practical difficulty if they take into consideration the shape of the lake and the flag lot and whether that helps the decision at all. Kirchner hears everything being said,understands it,and respects the foresight that has gone into planning. He hangs his hat on that practical difficulty being established but noted the Applicant has done a phenomenal job in what they're trying to accomplish. Erickson moved,Kirchner seconded,to deny LA22-000041,3005 Casco Point Road.VOTE: Ayes: 3,Nays 2(McCutcheon,Kraemer). OTHER BUSINESS—Update on August 8,2022 City Council Meeting Ms. Oakden shared the retaining walls at Rest Point Road was approved by the City Council and a project at 59 Casco Point Road was also approved. Due to lack of a quorum,the1354 Rest Point Road application was pushed back to August 22. She also shared that she has been appointed to Community Development Director for the City and they hired a new City Planner who hopes to start in October. ADJOURNMENT Kirchner moved,Erickson seconded,to adjourn the Planning Commission Meeting at 7:41 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. ATTEST: Mark McCutcheon,Chair Page 9 of 9 • Date Application Received:06/22/2022 O Date Application Considered as Complete:08/21/2022 Q /�j 60-Day Review Period Expires: 10/20/2022 1� ` To: Chair McCutcheon and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator 1404, A. �' tlkESHO From: Melanie Curtis, Planner h'1GG Date: 19 September 2022 Subject: #LA22-000036, Scott Gates o/b/o Lisa Thostenson, 2815 Casco Point Road, Variances Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variances for side yard setback, average lakeshore setback, and hardcover in excess of 25%. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends partial approval. Background The owners purchased the property in April 2022 and have planned improvements to the home. They have recently applied for an administrative building permit (RPS22-000126; Exhibit J)to construct a garage III addition to the rear of the home, meeting the setbacks;the existing detached garage will be removed. The garage addition project reflects changes to the site which bring the existing hardcover level down from 31.1%to 25%. The current variance application reflects changes to the roof orientation from a hip roof to gable within the side yard setback, as well as within the average lakeshore setback.They are proposing a first floor lakeside deck within the average lakeshore setback which exceeds the 42-inch height allowance within the setback. To support this plan, a hardcover variance is requested to permit 26.48% hardcover. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information:The applicant has identified the existing conditions as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance(s).Additionally,they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds there are difficulties in the location of the existing home which may support the variances for the change in the rooflines. Staff may be able to support he average lakeshore setback variance for the change in the lakeside roof mass as long as the change does not adversely impact views of the lake from the neighboring homes. The average lakeshore setback request pertaining to the new deck cannot be supported.As proposed,the elevated deck and railing appear to impact the lake views for the adjacent neighbor(s). A grade-level deck or on-grade patio (<_42 inches from existing grade) can be constructed in the same location. • FILE#LA22-000036 19 September 2022 Page 2 of 6 Regarding the requested hardcover variance,the application for building permit demonstrates that a level of III 25% hardcover is achievable and therefore staff does not find practical difficulty supporting a hardcover variance. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350&78-1279—Setbacks: LR-1C DISTRICT Required Existing Proposed Rear 30' 78' (including garage 78, addition) West Side 7.5' 4.8' 4.8' East Side 7.5' 10.5' 10.5' Lakeshore 75' House: 119' House: No Change Patio: 118' New Deck: 103' The existing home encroaches approximately 6.5 feet into the average Average Lakeshore lakeshore setback.The proposed deck will extend 18 feet lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line on the west side and approximately 15.5 feet on the east side. Section 78-350—Lot Area/Width: LR-1C DISTRICT Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5acres) 100' 1111 Actual 14,926 s.f. (0.34 acre) 56'@ 75'/56' @ OHWL Section 78-1403—Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 14,926 s.f. (0.34 acre) Allowed: 2,985 s.f. (20%) Existing: 2,324 s.f. (15.5%)* Proposed: 2,324 s.f. (15.5%) *According to Permit RAS22-000126 Section 78-1680 and 78-1700—Hardcover Calculations: The existing condition prior to the to-be-issued building permit RPS22-000126 is 4,4,650 square feet or 31.1% hardcover.The applicant is providing over 1,000 square feet of hardcover removals to reach a conforming level of 25%for permit issuance. Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Existing Hardcover* Proposed Hardcover Tier 3,731.5 s.f. 3,730 s.f. 3,953 s.f. Tier 1 14,926 s.f. (25%) (24.99%) (26.48%) *According to Permit RAS22-000126 Ili FILE#LA22-000036 19 September 2022 Page 3 of 6 • Applicable Regulations: Side Setback Variance (Section 78-350) The existing home is located between 4.8—7.5 feet from the west side lot line.The required side setback for this property is 7.5 feet. Due to the nature of the design,the proposed changes to the roof structure from a hip roof on the street and lake sides to gable ends will increase the mass on each end within the substandard side yard setback. A 2 foot overhang is permitted as long as the building meets the required setback. It appears there may be additional massing impacts proposed in the side yard area on the west side of the home (increased roof overhang, new shed roof over the kitchen window) however,the plans do not clearly identify the existing conditions for comparison. Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Section 78-1279) The aforementioned changes proposed to the roof structure from a hip roof on the street and lake sides to gable ends will also increase the mass of the home encroaching within the average lakeshore setback. Improvements within the average lakeshore setback are permitted with a maximum height of 42-inches above existing grade.The proposed deck extends from the first floor and will be situated approximately±6 feet above grade (the walking surface is 3.9 feet above grade on the west side plus a minimum of a 36" railing). Approximately 19 feet of the deck's total width is elevated above the lower level walkout on the east side and is shown to be approximately 8.2 feet above grade (plus 36-inch railing). The deck is shown to encroach into the average lakeshore setback between 18 feet on the west side and 15.5 feet on the east side. • Hardcover Variance (Section 78-1700) As noted above,the applicant is showing over 1,000 square feet of hardcover removals to reach a conforming level of 25%for their building permit issuance.Their variance request reflects an additional 223 square feet of hardcover to be added resulting in 26.48% hardcover. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health,safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance.The applicant is proposing to make improvements to the home on a residentially zoned property which is • FILE#LA22-000036 19 September 2022 Page 4 of 6 consistent with the intent of the ordinance.The hardcover level proposed is not consistent with • the hardcover regulations. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan.The variances resulting in improvements to a home in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. However,the proposed encroachments lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line and the hardcover level proposed are not consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The applicant is proposing to use the property in a manner consistent with the LR-1C district. Reasonable use of the property is afforded with the residential building on the property and the permitted improvement of the addition.The structural changes proposed within the average lakeshore setback resulting from the new gable roof may not be reasonable as it will increase the mass of the home/roof which may impact neighbors'views of the lake.The deck and the required railings proposed within the average lakeshore setback also limit the views of the lake from adjacent properties,and is not reasonable. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The location of the existing home on the property is the limiting factor and was not constructed by the current owner; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance to permit an increase in hardcover over 25%as well as the overall massing volume of the home within the side yard and average lakeshore setbacks has the potential to alter the character of the neighborhood. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as 411 follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems.Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06,subd. 17,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable,as residential improvements are an allowed use in the LR-1C District. However the hardcover level and encroachments into the average lakeshore setback are not permitted within the ordinance. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two- family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.There are a number of properties on Casco Point which are situated nearly in line with neighboring homes similarly to the subject property. The conditions applying to this property are not unique to the property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The existing condition of the nonconforming home location on this property is not specific to the property.The setback variance requested would be out of character and would limit the light, air,and open space for the adjacent neighbors. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.The applicant states the project is necessary for the preservation of FILE#LA22-000036 19 September 2022 Page 5 of 6 IIIthe owners'property right. Staff finds there are alternative opportunities to expand the living space of the home which would be more reasonable and would not require a setback variance. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter.The proposed hardcover level and setback encroachments requested are not supported by practical difficulty and may be contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.The proposed massing encroachment of the roof reorientation within the substandard side yard setback and within the average lakeshore setback over the existing footprint serves as a convenience to the applicant as they have reasonable use of the property with the single family home.There are alternate methods of constructing the additions without such a severe encroachment. Further, a grade-level patio is permitted within the average lakeshore setback,the applicant's choice to propose a deck resulting in more mass within the setback is a convenience.With the applicant's building permit plan they have achieved a conforming hardcover level.Adjustments can be made to the scale/size of the addition to accommodate new outdoor living space/hardcover. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments III Comments from the public have been received and are attached as Exhibit K. Most of the comments received do not support the project. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation The applicant's plans do not show the existing home structure to compare the massing increases/changes. Staff requested an overlay plan for comparison,which was not submitted.Therefore staff is unable to fully evaluate the potential impacts. Staff recommends the applicant redesign the plans to limit or eliminate variances. Regarding the variances requested to permit the new lakeside deck resulting in 26.48% hardcover where 25% is allowed,the proposed garage addition (for RAS22-000126)should be adjusted to accommodate the additional hardcover requested. Planning Staff recommends denial of the average lakeshore setback variance and hardcover variance relating to the deck.The applicant has the option of reducing the hardcover and installing a grade- level patio without variances. . The side yard setback variance involving the roof expansion may be reasonable if the encroachments do not FILE#LA22-000036 19 September 2022 Page 6 of 6 further limit the light, air, and open space of the neighbors to the west. If the Commission identifies practical • difficulties which support the roof changes in the side yard area,the new encroachments should be limited to the roof and any additional new impacts, such as roof overhangs and the possible new shed roof over kitchen window,should be denied. The average lakeshore setback variance to change the hip configuration to a gable thereby increasing the mass of the roof within the setback significantly is not supported by practical difficulty. Staff recommends denial. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application & Narrative Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing Survey/Hardcover Exhibit D. Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit E. Staff Annotated Survey Exhibit F. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit G. Staff Annotated Plans Exhibit H. Proposed Hardcover Calculations Exhibit I. Aerial Photos ExhibitJ. Building Permit Packet RPS22-000126 Exhibit K. Public Comment Exhibit L. Property Owners List Exhibit M. Plat Map • • PC Land Use Application Summary Exhibit A • Application Date: 06/22/2022 Address: 2815 Casco Point Road Orono, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 2011723320011 Land Use Number: LA22-000036 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: KURT&KELLE BOWE Address: Lisa Thostenson/Mark Thostenson 2640 Lakewood Ln, Mound, MN, 55364 Applicant: Name: Scott Gates Company: Address: 545 2nd Street#298, EXCELSIOR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 scottagates@msn.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Scott Gates scottagates@msn.com Associated Contact: • Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Variance Request Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application __J Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application _: Subdivision Exception t Vacation Application __I Variance Application Applicant Signature: • 2815 CASCO POINT ROAD-ORONO, MN 55394—UPDATED AUG. 16-2022 • VARIANCE APPLICATION NARRATIVE: Applicants Mark and Lisa Thostenson have purchased the property located at 2815 Casco Point Road—Orono, MN.They intend to fully remodel and significantly upgrade the existing home. The demolition of existing garage, remodeling of the existing home and construction of the now conforming garage addition is included in,and will be completed under a separate Building Permit. As part of that building/remodeling permit application process,existing hardcover was reduced to meet the 25% requirement. The hardcover variance requested here represents the additional net hardcover for construction of the deck. Since original submission of this variance request Applicant has also worked with staff to revise the request to address staff and neighbor concerns.The plans and survey have been updated to reflect these changes and reduce the variance requested. The changes from the original variance application include; • Moving the new garage construction to meet current setbacks.The setback was originally proposed to match existing setback(appx 6.2 feet),the revised setback is approximately 8 feet. • All new construction meets height requirements,with a Defined Building Height of appx 25' • Eliminated a 2nd floor addition that encroached in the average lakeshore setback • The hardcover has been adjusted to reduce from the approximately 32%existing to approx. 27.3%. • Adjusted new driveway to meet required sideyard setback. • Proposed new construction is denoted on plans by a key in lower right corner of pages. The updated variance request is now for the deck within the average lakeshore setback,for a new gable roof over existing house,and for hardcover exceeding 25%. Upon approval of this variance request the building permit would be amended to reflect approved variance changes. In the event this variance is not granted The owners plan to remove the existing old detached garage located adjacent to the Casco Point Road Right of Way, and build a new 3 car garage addition with living space above, attached to the street side of the existing home, and build an outdoor living space on the lake side of the existing home. The recent survey shows the lot is approximately 14,926 square feet, or approximately 0.34 acres. Existing net hardcover is approx.4,770 sqft.,or approx.31.96%.The applicant proposes new net hardcover of approx. 3,990 sqft,or approx. 26.73%-a net decrease of approx.780 sqft. (See survey for exact final numbers). The existing home generally meets required setbacks,with the exception of the West lot line, adjacent to the property at 2813 Casco Point Road. Required side yard setback is 7.5 feet—current side yard setback is approx. 6.9 feet. Owners have revised plans so that new garage construction setback is approx.. 8.1 feet,exceeding the minimum required setback. Applicants intend to remove and rebuild the existing dilapidated 3 car garage, constructing a new addition to • • the street side of existing structure. This new addition fully meets required setbacks. Owners have revised plans on West exposure to address neighbor concerns, by adding architectural detail, boxed windows, differing siding,and similar. Applicants propose replacing the existing dated hip roof with a new gable roof matching the garage addition.The existing hip roof structure is in generally poor condition,and will likely need to be replaced as part of the remodeling and new construction. Owners would like to replace the existing hip roof with a gable roof matching the addition. The defined building height for the proposed new gable roof over existing house is approx. 14"taller than the existing hip roof.The visual impact from ground to neighboring properties is unchanged as the soffits and fascia are the same for both roof—the new gable roof runs front to back,the same as existing hip roof. The gable roof proposed is simpler to build and install, and substantially improves the visual and architectural appeal of the property.This is especially true of the lake facing rear elevation. The proposed new gable roof building height is substantially lower than the maximum allowed,and is similar in mass and scale to most newer construction on similar lake sites. Additionally, applicants would like to construct an outdoor living space/deck attached to the lake side of the existing home. A significant portion,closest to neighbor,is proposed to be largely at grade. Owners propose glass railings(or rope wire)to largely eliminate changes to view. • The subject home is set back considerably further than the 75' minimum lakeshore setback. The home to the West shares a similar lakeshore setback, while the home to the East is setback considerably further than the subject property. Additionally the subject property has a 'walk up' exit from the lower level, which presents several unique challenges, both in grade changes and in a need to provide "cover"for this door location. The nearby average lakeshore setbacks, as is typical of many areas of the lake,show a wide disparity here.The 3 homes adjacent to the neighbor to the East all have similar approx. 79' lakeshore setbacks compared to the 120+foot setbacks here.. With its larger lakeshore setback, a deck at the subject property,would have minimal, if any, impact to the viewscape of property to the East—the existing home on the subject property would largely shield view of any deck. The property to the West may have some view of the lakeside deck, however it largely shares the same grade as the subject property, and the deck on the subject property would be primarily at or near grade on the West portion of the lot—presenting a minimal impact, if any. The outdoor living space on the property to the West is on the opposite side of their lot to the subject property. Applicant intention to use glass panel or rope wire railing further helps preserve views. The neighbor to the East has expressed no concerns regarding Applicant's plans for this property. • Applicant intendeds to remove much of the accessory hardcover, as an example removing foundation planting • areas and replacing with fabric.A net reduction,from approx. 32%to less than 27%is proposed. As part of the garage relocation the existing large and wide concrete driveway at the street would be removed, replaced with landscaping and yard, and a narrower more residential scale driveway(that meets sideyard setbacks)to the new garage. These changes would significantly improve the street view and serve to reduce congestion and parking issues along the narrow roadway. Applicants have worked hard to create an aesthetically attractive project that compliments the neighborhood, reduces existing non-conformity, helps address congestion adjacent to the road right of way,and addresses the unique challenges of the subject property,and ask these variances be granted. • • PC Exhibit B • Practical Difficulties ANALYSIS: UPDATED—August 16,2022 1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance..." The proposed project is the remodeling of an existing home. An existing detached garage will be demolished and rebuilt as an attached garage.The property is residential in nature.The existing principal residence structure is updated but the existing footprint, roofs etc. are unchanged.The new addition is conforming—the setback is over 8' roof heights are conforming etc. Existing hardcover is appreciably reduced.The approx. lakeshore setback of the subject property and the adjacent 7 additional homes on either side ranges from ^'78'to—124'.The subject property lakeshore setback is approx. 121'. Being setback further than subject property,the neighbor to East will see no appreciable impact in view. Neighbor to West will see at worst transparent glass deck railings largely at same grade as their property.The variances are in harmony with the Ordinance. 2. "Variances shall only be permitted. . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan." The new garage addition appurtenant to the existing single-family residence in a residential zone is III consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as well as the character of the neighborhood.The variance to permit approx. 27% hardcover which is a reduction from the existing approx. 32% hardcover is consistent with the comprehensive plan's lake protection philosophy. 3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. 'Practical difficulties,'as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a."The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls." The request to permit construction of a new attached garage addition and remodeling of an existing home with a lake side deck is reasonable,as the adjacent properties are not adversely impacted.The new addition exceeds required side yard setback. Mature vegetation and topography provide separation of the Property from adjacent neighbors.The height of the new garage addition to the existing home conforms with building height requirements.The new gable roof on the existing portion of the home matches the roof design and conforming height of the new garage addition and replaces old hip roof with new energy efficient roofing.The building height of the new gable roofs over the existing home will be well below normal conforming standards, will be similar in height to existing hip roofs and will run in same orientation as existing hip roofs.The fascia and soffits will be at same height as existing hip roofs. b. "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the III landowner. " The height of the existing home, location, and the slope,the shape and size of the Property were not the result of actions by the Applicants.The nearest structures on the neighboring properties are offset and set back sufficiently to allow for light, air, and open space between each of the homes. c. "The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." The variance requested will not alter the character of the neighborhood.The new garage addition is conforming, in setback, height etc..The deck location within the average lakeshore setback is consistent with the small setback nature of the neighborhood. A significant portion of the deck(primarily on the West side) is at or near grade,and lakeshore setback of the deck when built will be well outside of the minimum lakeshore setback significantly larger than several nearby properties.The deck will have no appreciable impact on neighboring property views. 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat. § 216C.06,subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78." This condition is not applicable. • 6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." This condition is not applicable, as the use for a residence is an allowed use in the LR-1B District. 7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one family dwelling as a two- family dwelling." This condition is not applicable. 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." The topography, lot area, lot width, irregular average lakeshore setbacks, and the garage's current detached location are special conditions unique to the Property. Removing the garage abutting the street will relieve congestion and parking pressure, and improve viewscapes,along the street 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located." The topography,which drops off as you move toward the lake,the detached garage and congestion • along the Right of Way,the 'walk up' basement and related topography,the narrow lot width and 1111 • location of existing home being remodeled,the widely varying lakeshore setbacks of the homes nearby, as well as the location of the garage on the lot make the Property unique. 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." Hardcover and other considerations prevent creating a conforming connection to the existing garage on the Property.The defined hardcover, deck and setback variances for the garage demolition and rebuilding attached to remodeled house are necessary to preserve the rights of the applicants. 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health,safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." Granting the requested variances for the home will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals; nor will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." The lot width, location of the existing garage,varied lakeshore setbacks of homes nearby,as well as site topography, and congestion along the narrow right of way, create practical difficulties affecting the Property.The setback and other variances for the home are necessary and will not merely serve as a convenience to the Applicants. • • • PC Exhibit D Proposed Survey(Variance) a i j 3 d 4 m iy r.1 09 w _ >, g"°�,�% Sago % u;E � 3 f w L ' -w°�'-L �C Pornwo4O�E F _• °o°u tE°g '41 <4W t�■VI z cc41 'Yms°„ a Fs I 0.' d a w E on �I 4,-, 8;117 2 t ,_• S -,2 .8.13 ,b. )6 Ofr.S�,z-. Ug FE ao °t P g dza � 0 C E"��I W 4/ -_ '-'P "' [<op :�7 w o 3,n m a o _ p:E-,o y X e. UVlO a•r -,c ! _ m,T._ 3 ,g / o %r ° • 2 n ZrEVOa°"'S�.eggg" �, (n ,��/ nO�s� V]a $ �E �� �p •3ll .,...s,*- w e- 7`\\ / w a85�° ., �°.... Cal�za0 o0•.) e c --' / by A \ / \YJ ( b / / \` >>7`X / ge iisq • / \`�'4 /`f'£0'__se //i/ii' / 7;�' `,/ * J � / Pik co S h n i . gag %i ,/ Z . __, - '4 // /y/�d�¢�v t d - o_ r g oa a'y/ 4// // Z d r % /i//%// /� W d ,-1 '„ o 4 , //// //// ; ! z N...__.._.. /i////i//i/i/ a 51 q 0 PC Exhibit E CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR Annotated LISA THOSTENSON • by Staff IN LOT 120, SPRING PARK & VAC. LAKE SHORE AVE. HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA \ry\c9s ss°2 C -S_. 7, I ?, F .. lib el O` rxznNc '"." /� 7`\ (0-6:0'.:b ,ensryN' GARAGE / \'� ! inv I» 'B I ,5 \ /NN 1 • 1 /I / kir:` (rear)(B t'/ \ 'I /..• e' / \ f Building permit o:``/. RP522-000126 1 .71- --'888-21 i i / R\ (r).c.•..,✓.r i ^,OF LOT 120 Bider«ya�rdmmnbd �.. /~0FdVEWAV \ .w ' ./'n I\ new gable roof I i `.... / (O '' \\I er�"' : .•.'5 O" • LINE 1 / ��\ /. ee LTHEOT ,AND of - / LOT VE TEl N PROPOSED SW'Ly EXTENSION New roof over bay T.� :GARAGE / ral window 47i-.:°'_7. A' '(P) F/4' �.e/ ew lez>; EXISTING gbp' ' . a E r ems 1: . / �.. #2813 / EXISTING ��,• / \ ! / EXISTING • •ry }. HOUSE �" / oe 93 / O \ '� 28 �l �15 �. � HOUSE 988- j io ( ) AN" a-•i nr a2817 co., • A: it$` w G \ <..• Jj \/ •ei erk:e7°\ \ /A loser _ \\\^� �� ;,r"...A p'� free.) ,.r/ .. '*aee // `\ r;' / \ / / \\ / 1r A approximate ALB \\ /'.-i,` encroachment area SCALE I N FEET ��984. /75' (1' \ % ` � ..Y w new Bable roof �-•6?� - / LINE ACK `• / /%: \�� °ea\ i�F• / fin (00 • '-'' _t�,s� \\\ \.. .Att9 n \\\\\\\ \. W* )a1'' : \\ \\� 'p '" ---7- ;..., foss.. LJ I \\\\ .S� b \\�e'z'*�\ \ � \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION : (per Certificate of Title No. 1541552) \o 4\\ \Ytyt\\\\ \\ All that part of Lot 120, Spring Park, and all the unplatted land and that 929.4 COM(x.R \\ \ ;Ct \\\•�\\� portion of Lake Shore Avenue vacated, lying between Lot 120 of Spring Park LNE(O.HW.) �\\\ \ \ \ \ \ and the side lines of said Lot projected to Lake Minnetonka, which lies - \ :\\ \\\\�\ northwesterly of a Hine running parallel with and five feet northwesterly ....A...„."--....,.........."..,\ \\\\,\ from the southeasterly line of said Lot and the extension thereof. LAKE -. �\\ \ \ \\� o denotes iron marker \ • denotes iron marker found M I N N E T 0 N K A (908.3): denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum SPRING PARK BAY --917--: denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of an existing house, garage, to be removed, spot elevations, ALTERNATE topography, large oak tree and the location of all visible "hardcover", and .the proposed location of a proposed garage, stoop, walk and driveway thereon. ,N.,.>,, It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. DATE DEBGFTION 6-13-22 e"ISE°""°`°° GRONBERG AND I hereby certifythat this plan,spec:cation,or report E III _ red by me,or der my direct supervision, 1"=20' ' ASSOCIATES, INC. ""° °as �'°m°dWy Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the Stcta of Minnesota. DATE CONSULTING ENGINEERS,LAND 5_16_22 SURVEYORS &SITE PLANNERS 4L5 NORTH 5 356 _ / / /� �6 lal LONG LAKE,MN.WILLOW DRIVE ��wer'rf �d -l3�ei 952-473-4141 Mark S.Cronberg Minnesota License umber 12755 22-063A 22-063A • PC Exhibit F A VARIANCE SET N z T\ < R 28 5 CA5C0 901\f 20A13 iA "`' no' it n714 r.nnn. .1;111:611�1:d1611 iiiI cirri i ,,e 1 IStral IPP.741 ill!i mfr.i s, i 1, .1 g .4.06551ail, lift < > E Pk il , .!ip om`' l• . . rE IL�■JI�\ A2 ff, lo� :'' ► ��� I PP PI wwwXPIPIPPIU.INllwAMIMI_ j: 10 hL���l•IIJJILI I L .l e F 1131lirI 1 Fy rNN.DME: - - - _ r _ _ _ 8/11/iaa - - - - - - - _- - _- - Mi5tO r ME: '4 WI I* Big H_ ... 9 -- i�IiI�Qlnii - gg _ iII --.. _ r ,,„,-ng.....,..r. 1 _ 7 J GFIb 9EE1 0 ' . • ....„.,..„..................r."...„-.......... ,r, VARIANCE SET ..S® ,-F-, s.s., ...,........-,:.---.,-.,,,,-,,,,T.,.... • 1.7.7...........7.7.4...171:=7.......17:""" ? ...# , .......---.....-.....- ----,-0,,-...., 12 An"'AgIN Ailu.N„ W.:4:4-717:7::7"--477:-:-of f-f-747-:-'; ...."'"Z.---='+.7.1%":-.FT%-27-Tiri-W.IF gl.....".r.....Z.-=?.?Zer.'...`,..,..','°TIT ,W,...m...,g3,1 PI f=x,1%........-"'"''''' a":7,4arirTZ.F.'='="-"r" -diefraiijialanigirialrant1111152-tb_:7NN, ASPHALT SNINCEES(IMP) .4164r.11g4I'.-1 11111111111444i6NN. ze • IRE 1 Re Ix g 1 Vint..racH Tronnows IN , 1 ix_ E 2 st " CEDAR SHAKE SIDING(TIP) 0 . E 11._.1_1.11_IL 11._J1 Jr_II . .mi_ II__I__ _ _ __.__ _ I I SEE 2 TOR DETAILS ,- •Hi. 1 i I 3/4,6-12ASONITE TRIM BOARDS(TP) .,.t.,..„ (3)IST.1151,41 CrODAR BPZETS" .I , " """",","" ___ ,,"",„"", ",", ,,_"______ I.1 > .., BOARD MO BATTEN SIDING MIP) GRS-AOT:ARAGE FIR+ —1 rye CEDAR TOP BOARDS e , .5: T ANCRORED TO ECM 205T BT TYP FRONT MI.WM a:0 -- TRIMMED 1r,..SPIATa 1 1'''''' F , • aGE BOARD ENDS SET POST TO CONCRETE PIER IN/ - 'SIMPSON*POST BASE TOP. MIN.1/re X 1.-2.LG.A.B.(BENT) SIMPSON ixe"BOO lin.r X 7 ji 1/2T)NUN EPDXY GROUT INTO ST RADIUS OTTE-CEDAR POST 5/13's HoLE - posT coNNECTION ... r FINISH GRADE -ST RADIUS ' SEE DEMI_3 b . 1 4 A :., 120 CONCRETE PIER 4EIT BELOW. .... GRADE .."--.77-____2-y10.CEDAR BEAU END PROFILES MM., 22-032 5iftf ©PERGOLA WALKWAY (DPOST CONNECTION (DCEDAR BEAM PROFILES 2 SCALE:1/4"-1'-0' SCALE:1 1/2"-1.-0. SCALE:1 1/2'-F-A" a 16 5a15 • • VARIANCE SET z * R 0 N get , r ■ a ` iwmmmr r ....eh.■. ■m niwor� ngeN m - ru r;or, i demrrnmmr - LY61B ia : l �wJn/ig � fillW5t... g 1 :nrr em .im ► •71lnYn. t __— ` [ I I E g E Z1 > — 1 ; 16 o , t , ,,,,t _ ; r.dodi -1 ,Tr. III 4 II II II II II II L — 1 111 ¢.9ez9' 1 `I per,,, II n ..�_..._.-. --t • J� EL.966.1 1 tJ Y q DE tl MitWA 81I112022 b 4111:61 1 _ REAR PUN•: 22UY2 ma c Ib Aft15 • _ J • VARIANCE SET kT @g N Z _sa - - --- - - _. - _ N! - M - __ - - _ICI VA ®■ �'® Ill 11.1 />-I/I- RtrBiri'ff� 1 PMPMf}q L i 8/17/2022 IMAM 1 0.966.1 EL 968.) ' GR6pE PfR SUR4ET WEST MCI 22-0721 Q. • VARIANCE SET ti,t m 1l Z z 0 ma__ - �.- -- - i R• < 2-.-', 9,4 12 419 Iri rwi vim: RAW 8/11/2022 PM EL BAA.5 GRADE/GARAGE M -._.. GRADE - J - WEST PIA.: 22-0521 MEI ��4A 0 i VARIANCE SET 7 s �m i fl e =_ _ - - _ - - - - — = yy z § 6. • 9N iii __. a o Qr g al 11A to IIIM r 11+,r � 111111111C . II1 - -_ IIMMI FM.DAM II 11 8/1//2022 -- - - EL 98).9 PEY15®DNE. _Aral GXELZARAGE ' HIGHEST COSTING GROUND FOOTPRINT VMII N AT 898 JWEST 0 _ EAST KIN x, 714YA SEEP 0 • ANCHOR PRONIOE 1/Y CIA BOLTS: z 10'LONG ANOMA BCLT5 B Y-0.MC.. VARIANCE S E T • •I/2'01A z B'talc P]N'STRGIG Tr SCEB'-IN STAN No.//CHUS MAT kA WERE USED FAE INSTILLED ANCHOR BA THE DO NOT MEET E ABOVE MUSA S. 1V n 1O'-I' 1• -B' B'-B' 2'-B' 13'-5' 8'-0• <: ;./ 1 m 1'-4' RE FILL B' .....x:.:�: ._....... Roar E own AND :: EMOV WALLS FLOOR IN 5 SPID1EE STORY Y OISTS AREA. H2 r1 - —— --_ LEVEL EOUNOQION .... ROOK JOISTS TO a H r_. ABEAS ro aE u"m1Flm xc CORE RL1ID 011 RmfDRcm ro J SUPPORT N II .. * 'i ��A} ........ b II ---- C--- II II & 1 Y 1 St ® I - II II jl q 7.2 t,Tt:_f._ I I B 23•-B•./-.VERIFY III i i i I---:- ,ci_ is _Ll 1 l..I.._l I q •B ..I •'1 r - ...... .....,... x 8 o �I r Om I gg iS _..__.1 _ FRONT I PORCH 1- I c •w I© IaB BBETR a,c a — 0y0R�� I - NF Eleanor 10 YARN T I0 a CONC.BU. Sr omTnc 1ST MOOR trt STEPS Ie,•co,e etJc II. ta"vB"PIa iV --- --1 1 :y, . 1 _ ,1c.._----7, -- - 1 ; 1-.'CORE Eli/ 'VB- 8/n/2an L ._........._.P 9 — 11 ..__ 1�- -J wvau q Id- J' © •— © © 0 © © oau Y-I• i B'-11• B'-11' 1 B'-11' 1 3'-B' , DEMO PLAN . GENERAL NOTES: - i •PROVIDE TEMPORARY BRACING AT ALL EXISTING WALLS,FLOORS,CEILINGS,ETC.BEING REMOVED AS NEEDED •PROVIDE TEMPORARY WEATHERPROOFING IN ALL AREAS DURING CONSTRUCTION •REMOVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS DAILY(RECYCLE AS REQUIRED) ,..... ` . •REMOVE ALLFIRE.VERIFY WITH OWNER N IF ANY QUESTIONS ��\ I \""" PIM'' •REMOVE BOTHLLFIREPLACES.SUPPORTING PATCH ALL OPENINGSRY. PRIORCH REROOFING ���� \�\\\ •REMOVE ALL LAYERS OF ROOFING ON EXISTING SECOND STORY.PATCH AND REPAIR AS NEEDED PRIOR TO REROOFING BQ \ •VERIFY WITH OWNER IF ROOF AND TRUSSES ARE BEING REPLACED •REMOVE ROOF,WALLS AND FLOOR ON SINGLE STORY SECTION.PROVIDE TEMPORARY WEATHERPROOFING \ ` \\ 22'0,21 •REMOVE EXISTING WINDOWS AND DOORS.PATCH ALL OPENINGS NOT BEING REUSED.VERIFY WITH PLANS --------- gef •REMOVE EXISTING STAIRWAY. PROVIDE SAFE ACCESS TO ALL FLOORS DURING CONSTRUCTION•LAYOUT NEW WALLS AND DEMO ANY EXISTING WALLS NOT BEING REUSED KEY TEY 6 LPIB SFB6 0 • VARIANCE SET 111 4 B S, R /)2-E', -9 A 2 2'-B•A -11' 6'-8' 12'-0' 23'-8' 44.' ........ ......._ + .... -+ BIB•SUPPORT POST I Ij ", J. 1IIH n II r j art . CIDs-e' �S ii �r I II ..'2 DW I it ;1.,11 / ii 11 .6 i ff SIZED By PROvIDER ._ FASTENED TO POSTS n A - " te ' h-H __� APPTOVEDNEHANGERs OR _ " I R'i.t '-- 1; I1 \ LLS�D,� !ill NI 1 ., II i 4 i. . , -gL sews II I 1 i y� //ICI `��1• B� I 'F____ pQ- F- L II L __I II!ill F cl r i- L -='•- n "TOME TRUSS ABOVE PROW? I T _11 II � _� tz OW $z 3 I II •I Na n tlu�€N 11 Q ; U 14_0. { 21•_B• r. ! IP 11 11 0 O �I I I n (3 1 3•-0 4-6" L 1 z 1�= 1 23 O 21 ® 11 _ il -,,,,,,,.0 2) 25 141 OrTr9 Or7d II i O�T IW i 131 .._...... - °-°. J2-6k 2-6� '-°• � FWLDAfE:\ "".`r.`°. ........Iv :::::::::............_ R - ein/ion 3._e• % ]_10• I EIACE l < I M ¢:t 1. It It__m a ft. OAfiI J4'-0'VERIFY ]-1" ]'-I" 8'-11' 6'-11' 24�D" 6-11' 3-9• - 38'-8' T-8• GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES ' •ALL NEW ROOF RAFTERS/LETTING JOISTS TO BE HELD DOWN WTI'HURRICANE CLIPS'AS REWIRED. - • ANGERS ON APPROVED EQUAL USED AT ALL LOCATORS SPEPFIED OR REWIRING HANGERS(EW ON STNG CONSTRUCTION WI.IS FLUSH FRAMED TO RECBAESAPPROPRIATE SINPSON HANGERS V.I.F.)• •WAG SHEEo ERSSINGLE YAW..(2)2X85 W/1/2•RIGID INSULATOR FLITCH. VD'S BLOCKED DOWN TO SOLID BEARING BELOW W/(2)234'S AND(I)2%4 AT EACH SCE •ALL HEADERS DOUBLE OR TRIPLE WNDOW UNITS(w SLIDING DOORS):(2)1 3/4'•9 1/2'OA'S BLOCKED DORM TO SOuD BEARING BROW W/4%4 POSTS �__ AND(1)2%4 mt.STUD AT EACH SIDE. ,,,n� _` •ALL POSTS SPEC'0 TO BE TRUE 4%4 OR.6.(2)OR(3)VS NOT.ALLOWED(UNLESS OTIERWSE NOTED) \``\ \ •FRONDE 2....COLLAR TES AT EACH R.R.AT R OCFS(3/]-1/3 RULE) •CUTS,NOTCHES AND HOLES BORED IN TRUSSES,LAMINATED VENEER LUMBER,OLUE-LAMINATED MEMBERS DR 1-3OISTS ARE NOT PERMITTED UNLESS TIE . RAY.: EFFECTS OF SUCH ARE SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED. 22-0321 •EXTERIOR w LOAD BEARING WALLS WTI PLATES CUT,DRILLED OR NOTCHED MORE THAN SOS OF THE MTH OF THE STUD SHALL HAVE A GALVANIZED METAL TE 18 GAGE AND 1 1/2 INCHES(I 1/3")NIDE FASTENED TO EACH PLAT:. :N.. \\ ( TI •Ex1ER1OR ON LOAD BEARING WALLS WITH STUDS DRILLED NITHW 5/8-OF E FACE OF THE STUD SHALL BE REINFORCED WTI A STRUCTURAL STUD SHOE KEY KEY / MI6 8 I 0 1110 VARIANCE SET i m 4'g-l15........................1``\`.........___'� 't.......................;...._t_tt•.._ t'-_tt-�__.�_] el MI O ,/'PD I6 t) IB 19 I\\�/JI ,lr I.O v ._l 2 O , 0 « F 2 4-. "' •„ Q Q a 1 g-10• " g _ I 1 .5.1• r 0 a L ,o IL liilll HHi I o o R Z • ..ova U L:m I " + i si 0 r m e , r �a d_ I" A OVER D' MOM ^ ---- PORCH W/RECESSED u g 1 "• AABBWE DOORWAY O or- �1 N s O 0 0 " h 3'-9' ]' 1. 5-10' '11" ] )'�9' U �LVGG L _._ A__.... _— __._._ 1 ......_ .._.. _ ..... r_..._ .__.._ .... 1 L j � vAre: e T r 0I rI e ]'_g• O'g• y_g• ]'-5' 6'-11' • 11._5. 2._0.12•_0.12._O.J2'_0.2._0.2._0.4=._0.2._0.2._O.Z._0.2._0.12._0.��._0.��._0. ]._g. f SECOND FLOOR PLAN }} }}}} }}} 44 III }}} I 7 }}} YYY GENERAL NOTES: PROVIDE TEMPORARY BRACING AT ALL EXISTING WALLS,FLOORS, CEILINGS, ETC.BEING REMOVED AS NEEDED•PROVIDE TEMPORARY WEATHERPROOFING IN ALL AREAS DURING CONSTRUCTION , - •REMOVE ALL BRICK.VERIFY Y DEBRIS DAILYER (RECYCLE AS REQUIRED) q*� �— \ •REMOVE ALLT BRICK.VERIFY WITH OWNER IF ANY QUESTIONS ,..:` •REMOVE BOTH FIREPLACES. SUPPORT AND PATCH ALL OPENINGS PRIOR TO REROOFING \ -RAN., •REMOVE ALL LAYERS OF ROOFING ON EXISTING SECOND STORY. PATCH AND REPAIR AS NEEDED PRIOR TO REROOFING •VERIFY WITH OWNER IF ROOF AND TRUSSES ARE BEING REPLACED V-ORG •REMOVE ROOF,WALLS AND FLOOR ON SINGLE STORY SECTION.PROVIDE TEMPORARY WEATHERPROOFING ._._...._.._...._...... %fif •REMOVE EXISTING WINDOWS AND DOORS.PATCH ALL OPENINGS NOT BEING REUSED.VERIFY WITH PLANS O •REMOVE EXISTING STAIRWAY. PROVIDE SAFE ACCESS TO ALL FLOORS DURING CONSTRUCTION KEY U •LAYOUT NEW WALLS AND DEMO ANY EXISTING WALLS NOT BEING REUSED MI6 9fEP 41111 VARIANCE SET 0 11.1 //'- SN , R i��i �\`�I r -1 I S TiI- -NI-1- I L „, L V CAS L 2 12 i9� r J 19� F_} ® • E k . 12 91- 9 IN J L • L................... • • 4---i--1�--1--t t- ---1---:+ --1---t---j+---1---1---1----rro 6/17/2022 • • • • • • • ®• • • • • @4YkV DME: ROOF PLAN GENERAL NOTES: •PROVIDE TEMPORARY BRACING AT ALL EXISTING WALLS,FLOORS,CEILINGS,ETC. BEING REMOVED AS NEEDED - •PROVIDE TEMPORARY WEATHERPROOFING IN ALL AREAS DURING CONSTRUCTION •REMOVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS DAILY(RECYCLE AS REQUIRED) •REMOVE ALL BRICK. VERIFY VATH OWNER IF ANY QUESTIONS •REMOVE BOTH FIREPLACES.SUPPORT AND PATCH ALL OPENINGS PRIOR TO REROOFING+ *REMOVE ALL LAYERS OF ROOFING ON EXISTING SECOND STORY.PATCH AND REPAIR AS NEEDED PRIOR TO REROOFING ‘���\ 1 \1 R.YI *VERIFY WITH OWNER IF ROOF AND TRUSSES ARE BEING REPLACED \\\\+\\\\\ », •REMOVE ROOF,WALLS AND FLOOR ON SINGLE STORY SECTION.PROVIDE TEMPORARY WEATHERPROOFING ilL \\\\ 1249�•REMOVE EXISTING WINDOWS AND DOORS.PATCH ALL OPENINGS NOT BEING REUSED.VERIFY WITH PLANS •REMOVE EXISTING STAIRWAY. PROVIDE SAFE ACCESS TO ALL FLOORS DURING CONSTRUCTION L .MT •LAYOUT NEW WALLS AND DEMO ANY EXISTING WALLS NOT BEING REUSED KEY 9 a 16 AEE15 0 • kIN VARIANCE SET lix s t, �` mz � Ilk e ir z g :k'' DRDLV.1 HEMERS 11111, til piii JIF© v.,v BEAM s-B•SUPPIIER -1 : .. : T v ---- IIII II II II II II it II II II II II 11 i II II II 1 II II 1 NI-_II Jl_IL IL_IL AI__I_1L_ -IL-JI- I I__IL LI_IL-A_IL-KJ wo�a e....wm. w.E�aa,om WIDER SIZED By SUPPIKR I I HEADER STEED By SUPPLIER i`1dg111 I I I V 11 II 11 I II tea.GJ DDDR Xd 91.GuuGE DC' Y I11 Mk n1ur: III d B/11/222 L L< MI a - sim — MAY.1 12-0Sz �c11 O - II MI6 5515 • I S VARIANCE SET I, fl r I r r r - r - r _ iu r r r g E o.=ti..R i r r 1 I 1 1 I " 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I IN 6 U 2S-N 11� R i,RSi;Too r I I I I I 0 ROM \ 8/1//20/MC�ME: 71 2 r.-,0. ..� rAteman y ,AR:ROOK \\ I \' J F MI 2 032 II a16 9£E15 0 • VARIANCE SET 11.1 { WINDOW SCHEDULE yy--��yyyyn 1- r{—�—A WINDOW ANDERSEN SERIES 400 OPTIONS I J' "' ( \y �( ) NO. SUE(AMA) HEAD HEWM MODEL DIAGRAM DETA0. MULL D SCREEN LOW-E ROAARKSJI \�/ 1 2'-0•x 3'-0• 6'-6" CK13R M/E YES YES YES W/CUSOM ARCH MOVE. ALE ELEVATIONS 1 g� x� 2 5.-0•x S'-0• 6'-6• P5050 F/E - YES - YES W/CUSTOM ARCH MOVE SEE ELEVATIONS al I WI rA AA 6 C 3 2'-0•a 5'-0• 6'-e• CK151. A/E - NM YES YES W/CUSTOM ARCH ABOVE. SEE ELEVATIONS 4 3•-6"x 3'-6• 8•-8" CN235 B - - YES YES - 9 Y-1•6 5'-O• 6'-6" CW35 C - - YES YES .II� 6 Y-1•6 4.-4" 6'-6" CW345 C - - YES YES - �y C���� r 7 2'-0',2'-0• a-0• A21 O YES YES - / \ II❑ c'� 8 2'-0•x 2'-0• 6'-e• A21 D = - YES YES - 1 L 9 2'-0'a 2'-0" IV -B• A21 D YES YES i 1 66 10 Y-1.6 5'-0• 6'-9• CW35 C - - YES TES - e 11 2'-6•a 3'-0" 6'-8" C1(15R M - - YES YES - 12 2'-0•a 5-0" 6'-13• CK151. A - - YES YES - ,�jy�r 113 2'-0•x 2'-0• 6'-0" A21 D - - YES YES - room mewsG 1<.! 14 2'-0"x 2'-0• (-W. A21 D - - YES YES,mrx nu IS 2'-0"6 2'-0 6'-0" " A21 D - - YES YES - CZ} 16 2'-8"x 4'-0• 6'-6• CK14R M - - YES YES - GEERAL WINDOW NOTES: 17 3'-0"a 4.-0• 6'-B" CK14L A - - YES YES - •CONRYCTOR TO VERIFY WALL THICKNESS.SILL,JAMS AND HEAD REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO ORDERING WINDOWS(VERIFY EXTERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTOR AESEMBUES 16 2'--S"x(-0• 6'-B• CK1412 M - - YES YES - MD PROVIDE APPROPRIATE E%TESSION JAMBS) 19 2'-0"6 4'-0• 6'-6" CK14L A - - YES YES - •90 ALL WINDOWS AS MOERSON 400 SERIES(OR MOONV EQUAL) 20 2'-0"a 2'-0• 8'-0• ut D - - YES TES•ALL CUSS TO BE LOW-E RILED CAVTY(MIN.IN.0 VALUE TO BE.JO) T�J •ALLWW SUPPLIER TO PROVIDE PROPER HARDWARE N NULL UNITS TOGEEITHHER AS 21 2'-0•6 2'-0" 6'-B" A21 D - - YES YES - INDICATED • WINDOWS AT DOORS TO HAVE WOOD El-TENSION JABS PROVIDE TYPICAL 22 2'-0•,2'-0" 6'-B" A21 D - - YES YES - i A 0 SILL WITH STOOLAT ALL WINDOWS 23 2'-0•a 2'-0• B-B• A21 D - - YES YES - •WINDOWS AND DOORS TO HAVE INTERIOR TRIM TO MATCH(STAINED). •BASEBOARDS THROUGHOUT HOUSE TO MATCH EDSRNG(STAINED). 2{ 7-1 ,4-6 8'-8• CW345 C - - YES YES - 111 •ALL WINDOW HARDWARE BID AS STANDARD WWII(VERIFY WTM HOMEOWNER PRIOR 25 S'-4"x{'-0' 6'-6" P3540 0 - YES - YES MULLED MOVE 26 TO ORDERING).DOOR HARDWARE TO BE VERIFIED WITH HOMEOWNER BID AS DARK RUBBED BRONZE 26 3'-0•a 1.-9" - M351 0 - YES YES YES - 1. •ALL DOOR SWINGS AND OR OPERATOR TO BE VERIFIED WITH HOMEOWNER 27 3.-4.6 4'-0• 13.-9" P3540 G - YES - YES MULLED ABOVE 28 •ALL DOORS REWIRE SCHVGE S AND MATCHING HINGES. SEE FLOOR PLANS FOR DOOR SZES MD SWINGS.VERIFY WITH OWNERS FOR COLOR AND 28 3.-4",1.-9" - M351 0 - YES YES YES - :TYLE 29 3.-4•a 4'-0• W-6" P3540 0 - YES - YES MULLED ABOVE 30 ANY NEW WINDOWS( IN ALL BEDROOMS IN I BASEMENT). * IS.ME AND EACEEN 5.)�. FT.EGRESS CODE(SIMPLY BY 24%AND A WINDOW). A MIN. T OPENING OF 30 3'-4"x 1'-9" - M351 G - TES YES YES - 20•.A MIN.CLEAR HEIGHT OF 24•.MD A SILL HEIGHT OF LESS THAN 44 INCHES 31 -3.-4•x 4'-0" 6'-8" P3540 0 - YES - YES MULLED ABOVE 32 •BFOL FlNALLD 2009 IRCR SHALL BEG REQUIR/BASEMENT EGRESS WINDOW SIMILAR. •FOLLOW ALL TEMPERING REWIREMENIS(SECTION 306)IN ALL 32 3'-4•x 1'-9• - M351 C - YES YES YS 91 - HAZARDOUS AREAS(STAIRWAYS,BATHROOMS,ETC.)V.I.F. 33 J'-4•x 4'-0• 6'-8• P3640 0 - YES - YES MULLED MOVE 34 §z 34 3'-4•x 1'-9• - AN351 C - YES YTS YES - 35 NOT USED _ - - - - - _ RUHT.YOKA 36 NOT USED - - - - - - - - 8/1//20T1 37 2.-4•6 5'-0• 6•-8• C9115R M - - YES YES VW DST MASONRY OPENING AFT BRICK REMOVAL 1169149DNE1 3B 2.-4•x S'-0• 6'-6• CW151 A - - YES YES VIE EAST MASONRY OPENING MT BRICK REMOVAL 39 4'-0"x 3.-4• 8'-8" C235 6 - - YES YES - 40 3'-0•x 2'-0• 6'-8• A31 0 - - YES YES - 41 3'-O•x 2'-0" 8'-8• A31 D - - TES TES - 42 ]'-1•x 3'-0• e'-6' CW33 C - - YES YES NE DUST MASONRY OPENING AFT BRICK REMOVAL NOTES 1.THE WINDOW CONTACTOR IS REWIRED TO PROVIDE TEMPERED GLASS WHERE REWIRED BY CODE 2.THE WINDOW CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL FLASHING AND CAW(AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE JOB. " 3.THE COLOR OF THE FRAME IS TO BE VERIFIED WITH THE OWNER. 4.SIZES AND MODELS ME MOERSEN SERIES 400 OR EQ. PLAN s1 22-0YA 12 Of 16 FBEIS II 0 VARIANCE SET DOOR SCHEDULE :F DOOR DLSCPoPfpN ANDERSEN iZ RDIARI6 i 6E NO. SIZE(WON) DIAGRAM MATERIAL MODEL/ HINGE QUANTITY 001 3'-016'-5. B WOOD - L - 6aE 100 16'-01R'-0" J INS - - INSULATED OVERHEAD DOOR W/WINOOW 101 8-01T-0" H WS - - INSULATED OVERHEAD DOOR W/WINDOW 102 3'-016'-6" G WOOD - L W/SDELICHT 103 5'-0"x6'-6" F W000 FRO6068R R W/SCREEN 104 3'-016.-8. B WOOD - L 1 HR RATED 105 5'-0"x6'-B" F WOOD MO506BR R W/SCREEN 200 6'-018'-8" F WOOD EW0606BL L W/SCREEN Z 3-0 3'-0"x6'-8" A WOOD INTERIOR R 2 - 1i 3-0 3'-016'-6• A WOOD INTERIOR L 2 - 2-0 2'-B"x6'-13" A WOOD W1EI60R L 2 - 2-5 2'-615'-8• A WOOD INTERIOR R 4 - 2-6 2'-616'-6" A WOOD INTERIOR L 2 - 2-5 Y-6•x5'-6• A W000 INTERIOR POCIRT 3 - r _ �I _ 2-4 2-416'-B" A W000 INTERIOR L 1 - ❑ i_I - - 'il r 2-4 7i1A'-8" A WOOD INTERIOR POCKET 1 - ■�-1II • 1-0 1'--016'-0' A WOW INTERIOR MEOW 1 1-6 1'-6•x6'-. A WOOD INTERIOR ENFOLD 1 B 4-0 4'-n1C-B" A WOOD INTERIOR &FOLD 3 - DOOR DI1/DA115 e o [ F o x ' 5-0 5'-O•x6'-a" A WOOD INTERIOR &FOLD 1 -Wale QQQ 8-0 6'-0'A'-0WOOD' A INTERIOR BIFOID 2 - I f \ Y NOTES:1.ALL EXTERIOR DOCRS 2.THE DOOR CONTRACTOR ARE REa�D ro ROVIDEETENPPERED DOORS LASS WHERE REQQUERED DY CODE • i i i 3.SLAB TYPE,COLOR OF DOOR,FRAME ARO HARDWARE TO BE DETERMINED BY OWNER. 4.DOOR PROVIDER MUST MEET ALL APPLICABLE CODES. fl 2 0 5.EACH OVERHEAD DOOR TO HAVE ITS OWN WIF1 ENABLED C-IRATE DOOR OPENER INSTALLED.VERIFY BRAND W/OWNER. 1yL FRAME DIAGRAMS .�.F��� __ 8.ALL DOORS TO BE SET 4•FROM CORNER OR IN THE(SHIER OF THE WALL UNLESS NOTED. l`ES`J w-�CAMS 2,"'—��.� R.VERIFY ALL DETAILS,QUNOIOES,SWINGS,ETC.PRIOR TO ORDERING Qa N V 7::::A n.,, WAINER FM '37' — =:arm----- `.� M SHEATHING 7.� ., 8/Y/OM mond � .* I • il- ''`� , �' TYPICAL HEADER DETAIL�� GRACEY �..n-,„ .9,...1- 100 ra 'tit, ,-- =Ir.'.Zg.....:. , — •"mL-aa:saa---" = e=.�._ i�7.•�i7 '', lam a WINDOW/DOOR ROUGH-OPENING WATERPROOFING WRAP _ TYPICAL EXTERIOR CORNER . ,..,e`m ®o..„, 12-C62 513-r 13 ono 9@15 • VARIANCE SET kIN TN- AA tz. run 1�u1 inirwr.nruiruir E► tr n, :irum■nununm i n . r Pin. nrurnrnrrnn- umr. � .n���r. r . 1 r• '1HHfiVIfiV:6Ym —19 l +lid'� j at:af Mil. MiliiiYhi,. i 1 < > ` - v E ---_l-:f1 - -__ _1 1 II II a II II II fi II II 1 ill cLAss ; R 6 , RAJUNG r'. - 7 . PANEL .-._. - _--.--...—T , _I EJ I I 1/N FIRST R 04 LI hIIIIIIIII v • a milmommimmmonmmomin NIMMIMMINNIMINIIBItIMMINIIIIMMIIMINIIMMI NIMINIMMINNELE arrrrrrr� F M•11•1rrrrrr� MMMINNIMM • MIIMIIIMIN �� __��■__ ��� 714YA %fa 16'-0'K 10'-0'DECK 10'-0'K 20'-0'DECK 14 a■sEt15 0 0 li I VARIANCE SET z'n .....,_,.________ m.,.__1, 1 ill Z IIIII II 1 — MINNII-11 -11•1 — 11 1 1 . .... .----- . ---___----- ___—_—=... --.1 r__ PRONOM.MOUNTED TO rHE SIDE OF 6.1 POSTS W/SIMPSON HANGERS.Il.G BOLTS OR APPROVED ELL 1 117!, !H ,17!I 7!I 11 I IIIIIIIIIIIIIII g 202 LEDGER BOARD WITH.10 g JONSTS ON(2).10 BEANS.SIZES VERIFIED BY PROMDER,FASTENED TO E POSTS VIsIMPSON HANGERS OR g E, al ,—,:,,:i —.., , APPROVE°EO 1 1 1 11 I 11 g it 0 I 1 6'-0"X 1 V-0"DECK I 10'-0'X 20'-0"DECK ig Ai ll-N ,-- R' E-- I ki i i Mt IVA: ,—It I I ' Imam—I I 01519212A1E3 1 I - I DA6 POS,ON 12-0 CONCRETE PIM AB' , ' ® * BELOW GRADE .Er r 2 g KAN ge, 51fier . i 1 I6 HET5 • • • PC Exhibit G N z kz Estimated kIN Roof Expansion Impact Areas g it it t, a_____ _,...,__ _____ _ i _ ____ .. - ___ _ _ 4_ _ - �! ti- _ .M- I = — = - - _ - R 110 A flgtril � or — / _ =� _� 11.1 0 / _ li NI/1 - 8/19/2011 WA=DM am/ JY E�L. 86)� J _ YYY 4R/UE 4 SURVEY WEST New shed roof over bay window PLAN,: 22On 9r 4 III • VARIANCE SET 0 e -. t L i - - — _ - .WW.� awe _ _ - - - - - - - - — _- - _- - - -- - I_ ID "IIIMW........ IF L V < > ii 1 0 i 8J za dg1 egm Hall114,444,41',5A.541,54I- - - o r F ........-,. ,111111111111 r. 11111111111 GM 4 Li V II:P nyrvae Il is :I 8/17/2022 — MOM. • CA T11'9 mama M 965 ® ® ORAp/GARAGE ' Mai HIGHEST p19RNO GROUND - LML(OUCH NC RUILgNGS ",•,• _._.__ FOOTPRINT 9 ON WEST __ ..._._.- __J ELEVATION AT 999 7 e _ EAST Knot 22-032 Mr MI6 MI5 0 • VARIANCE SET lIN V\ /�---- ----�\ fl R I N Side L iVg New shed Side roof?? L 1 72 Z g� F-+ -g i 1 EE Qs L_+_= 1 1• t.____ , I- 12 il 9� I 8 Ft ALS 7 H m L _ - O e 11 I , _ 9L \\***"%L ., .._._ J _ tr PWLDME: WEED DAZE: ROOF PLAN GENERAL NOTES: - PROVIDE TEMPORARY BRACING AT ALL EXISTING WALLS,FLOORS,CEILINGS,ETC.BEING REMOVED AS NEEDED •PROVIDE TEMPORARY WEATHERPROOFING IN ALL AREAS DURING CONSTRUCTION - !, •REMOVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS DAILY(RECYCLE AS REQUIRED) - I •REMOVE ALL BRICK.VERIFY WITH OWNER IF ANY QUESTIONS •REMOVE BOTH FIREPLACES. SUPPORT AND PATCH ALL OPENINGS PRIOR TO REROOFING ' REMOVE ALL LAYERS OF ROOFING ON EXISTING SECOND STORY.PATCH AND REPAIR AS NEEDED PRIOR TO REROOFING - •VERIFY WITH OWNER IF ROOF AND TRUSSES ARE BEING REPLACED - WW1 PLAN.:•REMOVE ROOF, WALLS AND FLOOR ON SINGLE STORY SECTION.PROVIDE TEMPORARY WEATHERPROOFING 22-059 •REMOVE EXISTING WINDOWS AND DOORS.PATCH ALL OPENINGS NOT BEING REUSED.VERIFY WITH PLANS \ . •REMOVE EXISTING STAIRWAY. PROVIDE SAFE ACCESS TO ALL FLOORS DURING CONSTRUCTION 9teP •LAYOUT NEW WALLS AND DEMO ANY EXISTING WALLS NOT BEING REUSED KEY 9 EP IR RWNN III 1 Proposed PC Hardcover - Variance (Az TFR A/A re ) Exhibit H City of Orono • K�6\ Hardcover Calculation Worksheet _ • Property Address: 2 8/5 c4 rco /oi,vr AO. `'x=.ot-E` Prepared by: Date: Glt o,,vBCR G f 4'110 ciit t")/hc,c. 8-/S-2 Z Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier�) Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2:C ROPOSED HARDCOVER) In the following table,identify air-Items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key Surveo Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total Y (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage)Hk�F (24'x 30) (720 S.F.) A BA Al G2.(r r4, -C E7rifr'e /Y12- 7eNJ/[A4YrI€M - /5/2S S.F. T_G c AfAiOvc?,) !S A3 C - S.F. r 1Qrio,i 7TFP rr /2'f S.F. j1rObP '. 1rc ACE",(EAto1/ED _3.5 S.F. E Corc/C. WA l.K are fr6 At Acc MCVcQ S.F. F C'ax,,C. /4/t/F i. �0 AC AFr+t7r140 -09-3$- S.F. G CO,vc. ,t7 G,�R,(GF ►c 1:rn DC `fjtald6/ -*-2-- S.F. H srfP5 re' recc 4 Al 27 S.F. F/.t Gf Tarvf At47)4 a C7"4 if if EjLtGVyD --74t-e- S.F. J C.!/ i L4.1-6SrAPE O/ EX S' r, ,C7c AC itE/44(W ' - /2e S.F. • K L ifO/cK/�S OL.[Sr7 cA }. cra RE Aricted6P 52 7- S.F. N/ivG G�/AGL.S !, 6 S.F. M AErti 9/ S.F.NDE[EC i 17`EOS ,� 2p S.F. O ' Ai t�A "ITN TN II- AA 0 r r /. It-6c BFI Ave;'Saito uc0. 7 S.F. P A,t 0�0.1^F.rO cA Apt GE' Q 0 S.F. Q /AoA0Ifd .!'/ ce-A f S.F. R /A erOlt�I fToOP S /ADP PICA LA-1 t M 6 ti S.F. 7 2. S.F. T /,tOPDf6D D4'CM .�6'0 464r ITfPS;7'#10lid.Piguickv( _32 3 S.F. U V S.F. S.F. W X S.F._ S.F. Y Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover 9f23 S.F. - it S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): t AEriAA.,to, Erik LS- ?o/ S.F. IfK _ /oa S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)] iS.F. (4) Total Lot Area /;/,ti_‘ 26 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)1 J 2 G. y 8 X- (/4 L7FiwATE") _ 4110 Subdivision Application-January 2016 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 19 • pC . .....v.N-;,;,0'' --7,.,--;.2-,,t- i'... . s...::• . ..,4 ..,/,,r. . i .', ,'...i; ''.1.;,*:Z,- / ,fi... ' .1 -- ,--...,.'‘ ., rt,' ' ..t-,---1., Subject , . ,,,,,,e Aitt,, k ,, ,.., .0e''''qlti49 AO*/ *-'''''' .'"' •::17 . ** , ' t` •.'''..1, * ' ''' ,2*1: * i . .,, k ;•. *: ''''•.7,1'.4*'":0,7:4;( Atit, •/* * 4-- -1 ''''' , . .. Exhibit I , • -...... ', ' - .,.', ..-,,/ ' -4,.... 2.!'f',-,, ; . . „ -..,.. , 1.171.P . I.T..*-e;,-„ -.-.., '' ' -- I et4r.-,.t '.1•. --, •,,,-, , , -;,',:' - -`".t.'" -le' "',;,-,-•• ,:4 ..-..,.-r. -. .w. y l'4e.':`,.t Iffi,,,,--r".,, . ...'• .. ,;-7: ,,,_ „.,,,:t.,',•k-,- . ,,,- .,j)•7,f - .., ••`•,,c,,,!,,,7 , 1 .,: ris • ',' ' .'`'--4-`,4.-,` iiii''-'1 ' - • ', ..;'N'''.- " ' ` -•-', / . ' iit 1 v „44.':., 44'• / ' 4 : ;.4.„,,,,,, 104'''' .,,,, ' *ii41, ::, ' ' ' • '.. '' 4fii. ,ftf/ ''''' \ ' — !''' ,,f" -.-..-.iO4: ....--• klt, .' .,:.-, ,t . . itt;11,/ ,., 'tio.'.-4 ... ,,.....,. ,....;-- --.. .,... .• - ' 4,:ip..- ,,,, ;ti - .4 „.:-.1 :,„ ,-....-f • • 74",--- ... - ; , .4. ....., , ; , ...A.. -. .,....:..,; ....., .i ,r., ,.- , ,,,,,."6- :7,„,, .• ,m...- 1.-',"'",-i ,•..*;: • .47," 1.'.**. It' - . ,,L' ' '-...,.7.-i,,,',,14!-. . . 217 ''.'""' ' .'4?.' .''‘.,,,, N-174" .',•"!,-( ' '"'• `..f-:' ,f ' 1›,--, ".-- ,...,..--4.,:-- . .-„,.., .•„ ; ..—. .'.,,. -• :-.3,... . .., • - -;,;.....z.;„• . .-.;d:.: . - -.X-it Pr-0• '•I'''' ,fr4S0 ,,44 l'' ' ..'.`••. **:',7:'77 f:::S':: -1'1.;'::7:'''' i-...,. ,'-;:;:,•-':..':77; Ii].';';-4'.'''..::.;.:-.',-''::','• : ,,,,,„'-'4.-',,• :-..:2i,,,';•,.:, ,` 4' ' -:' tc',.---,i:; 4*.•/, `' ,,, i'1711,,,4t-•,4,-.- ' t''..:..-/ -'.t.tr-,:-1-e.t..,:V":',40-r-:...',..':... -,—.7:). •* 41. .. *". ';.•„,..,1., .. ., .i,...... -. ; ."--A'--, ;'*--.,' ... - i -......4 • , ,• .---:„. . '4 ' it ' -..;.. . ,.. ''.1,!1.1.''AST.' 4 , .f- ;.. CA., ' ,••• ,i, 4 '.o.,, ,.........*: — : ,I ' '.....• ) \'.",,.,.....' 4.--'44..:iiiiV* I \\. . . ---,...:...-i... . --''....f,..=';' '',., ,.,i,,'„ -2-,.#,:'-.. -... ,.'. ..„-,:lkfi.,..* ':,'''..!*•:, '-'''.:...,.,:,1- ',! ::,'*:;,..' .1.• , ,!. • A " -,-.. lgt ,-- 0 • Subject Facing South (lake) sit*". ill!: E ,xx P".1 ly 1. I; 0 0 _ .. _._. , .4 iliti:4 ,.. • . i 4,,,,,:,:',' , , a0i.' .4,..., 'i. .1' . • ... s,...'' '' '...,..., ', /4 1 ..:::-.,-,._„•„,i;: : 0 V. . , , , •14.e. ...,- ...., , - . i ,..'-,:.-*‘;'' il . . , / .e. :" ' - i1.--..-.-- ..- -41.6;, - , . / .,, .7"* 7,''''.'!-,-,;..-'" ***.t..-,;',44 / 7.ti,!,..,,, . ..*I.i.,...t. . . .. .., / .,,, -.11.7,-,.‘ ' ,-,, . . .r.,.? . .,..... of. 4..g." Facing East . Faci--- ,i ./4.,,,,,.. Subject ., . , ,,,,, , . . • r,....: ,r-•'' ,„„,., . ne ' ,-. : -,'''' '''.c.,-4.. .,410.„,,,,x.... ., ,,,:, , .. 7, ,,,,'.. 5 •-- ,.., . ' .5 - ' Ntii.,! , ,,..74.4-. :.,,,. ,,,,, ...,. ,.....„,,,;.. A . ^ . m -4*-17'''' V. . ' ,.." , --,Z1‘ •.. . u:ir.t... ,.... , .. . ' r --'°- i'...t',.. . : ,,' #f''..;•.';.".;;';'4., , _ , t .' ...,. ,, ,,,,, .''..::--- .'.-,.• -,., '' .. .0-4 .,,,• :- st-„,. , :.,. . '.',.. ,',„,t.'",'.2„: *7-:',. 4 '' ,•„*". 1 1.*;*•>'•:• 4 * .,., _ ,.,. .re. 'rpit .- . ,.. • '...i,•*,,l'•••?..,.; ':', , : '-'• ' ... , ,,-f.,;,..,,,,- „..,4, :,,,.. ,,_ , ,,,, .Ji•-:,--,,,,>;:::_. - ,, ' '-''''sky, r- 4_1 t. ./.../ :.•!:-.2.„,,;,,,- -:- , • ..;',`,,J. ., ...:11.0 , ..,.' .. ..-:' ;sr ,-:,.., „..„,... - ,.,..,,,.„,„,.... 0 • ., to , p. tent • --- MY.*' '! -,,kt, - . ' ..„'''-.1 ', ' 4''''‘' ..,...,:• ,,„k„,,.•...,:„..,...,......w.,:••••„. ..... .... • . • 1 ' tlitrit. G ti # z x Subject 1 , :,,.!.,.. ,..;;,.,,?.. . .,;.:.• ., . • . ... 1�p .. 4 : • , s ' '',..,..„,„..„. 10, 4. „,., „:„,,,,, ...„,,,,4„..,. . .. r fi, .- y`�k� ?•� �� "." ..$ k„,„ . iv. 4.44 1''4"' t :` ,ti v. yK .,ik 'f,''• 1 " . �t-*'"T,,,, y,... Facing North , i#VAti-' -',"45'.'Al.'.: l''''')*'' '`..-7'-'—.*' 4 ,'S4-4 F..'x "i e r ,wAlit- « � °. # . < f`lt.,iir +�y. � s i4' f' »tfi -,,:,,,V .' -, -,, • \ .,...r.:.''. r ,,...;,`,,t.--.,- —. 4,,,,,..,., ,. , . 11,:,- ,, --,,...,. .,..-1,,,,,:7- ,l' .'^:'''Akr':- ® �: , '+ , {; 3� e M .. k , r - y+�/+t' ;' 4 '�l `fir .d: -_; • • RPS22-0000126 PC Permit Plan Packet Exhibit J City of Orono �o�o Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 2 8/5 e <,k„.0�'E Prepared by: Date: 411 G,eo,vB F'R c . ,R 1'1 o C/,f TEl /NC. `y - $- 15-22 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) 6:301 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: ROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table,identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key tSurvey Hardcover item(Describe) Length x Width Total Y (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A /la cif't' Ex.rr,.e. /1f -7ewirk,vfr AS o►fo, /y25. S.F. B CA/CI GT •, r-To B'_8E'Movca -" — S.F. c PAT1 G I"'Tr, o 5rcc P / 2 y S.F. E �� .PTO Pf R F,s2F1/t_[� _ —�� S.F. C O,vC. w,t4K /e (To R6Mo 1 L `) S.F. F Ce.r.r_ PA/tir , (To �'t' A't�cvr- ,6314---� ,t S.F. G caC, r r,t R i G F (Ta BF- RE-6tt , r/ />: S.F. H STEPS To cfLt.,ig „ 27 S.F. I Fl,tGfrorvF IPA'7'N „ Cro dF AFFfovr,0 ) -7.7,-19.- S.F. J GuOoD G. A/0.Tt^,r,of tlORDC/S ,r ('ry BEAFkovco) I-z0 S.F. K Ac',k OA/ /G.tS7/e . T 8E PEn¢te4) - S.F. L A/c /,A D f.. 6 S.F. M ,l E y"A,d ,n--G Ga/d L G..5- ,' 2 o/ S.F. N DfC'k ,4 Frt.Pr 299 S.F. D if./tiFk /4 rE// DAD /38- G6 8_6/..G cu 72 S.F. P At0/PIf,2 GJA4G 709 S.F. Q /.[6dr,fEO 1I1Lhea/A y p70 S.F. R At oparC9 frccp _ 66 S.F. S PA Gil 6.1T ld Ltd' Lk 72 S.F. T T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W _ S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover 3 p3/ S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): M REy'/,,t'„ir £.'/Lt r 20! S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 2.e/ S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 3 73 0 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area / 9 26 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] I 2Y, 9 9 .4 • Subdivision Application-January 2016 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 19 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR LISA THOSTEX SON • IN LOT 120, SPRING PARK & VAC. LAKE SHORE AVE. HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA / S A 6 . . T HOC 4.05:inte..ct. / ••--. • 't ,....,,,,C4,.a tomf / :, at / �\ 5 e 1 / 1 / \ / sc Lr L11E "oe6_1`h .1 /^PROPOSED ^ �,,,.J ��? , a LOT 120 ' / DRIVEWAY. \ �' i / y G1'4\\ 4. / 'f\ N ` Ti PARALLEL WRH / l. f}', i• / I --TIT SE•LY LRIE Or // �� J / ) LOT 120 AND IT'S 'fie PR )I •• / J SW'Lr E�ICTENSgN / I / ;r�N'GARAGE I / EXISTING (P) ( .� 7 ,e ,..., 7 HOUSE rM1 F.1 , - / ' . / t Q #281J • / ere s Q R J F„aA� / ` EXISTING . •A5.. / EXISTING 4 HOUSE +t ;� / of #2815 / w,e HOUSE 0 N\\ .d.eATo (A) CiN ie� 96e _d'O .aei-e r'i� #2617 v• vv� n,, / ���" news - ' / e^ • /gs4 rtFMM4M* liter® �`1\ / '• I IMIIIIIES `. j��\/ % �''� / t' �g SCALE I N F EE T - yy(�� / ' {/ " /,7ETBACK� ` 91 .. ^' i '7. %... P. / UPC '". / / ep J;yyl' .,^i \•R-#0.`` i.L.. / leery '{✓ �'�� \ p / O \\\\\\ e / rer . 4 M '�\���F, -- .\ *a `/4ac, , /�,#:1 0^0 Iv/ \ \�\��.4 \43A`e\', .•�...•Ru2i '�Q \ \ \\ \\ \\ LEGAL DESCRIPTION (per Certificate of Title No. 1541552) \ •\ \ All that art of Lot 120, Spring Pork, and all the un lotted land and that �� \ \ ,\\ \ \ \ P u vP �\ - \ \\ portion of Lake Shore Avenue vacated, lying between Lot 120 of Spring Park 929.4 c017rOUft \ - \ \ \ \ \ \ and the side lines of said Lot projected to Lake Minnetonka, which lies L29(oxw.) k\\ �\\\\,;,�� northwesterly of a lilne running parallel with and five feet northwesterly \� \ \ \ \ \ from the southeasterly line of said Lot and the extension thereof. LAKE \\\ 0 : denotes iron marker \\�' • : denotes iron marker found MI N N E T 0 N K A `.. (908.3): denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum ---917---: denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum SPRING PARK BAY Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of an existing house, garage, to be removed, spot elevations, topography, large oak tree and the location of all visible "hardcover", and the proposed location of a proposed garage, stoop, walk and driveway thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. DATE LLAOATbn GRONBERG AND y plan,specification,or report eDATE e[veeo waocwp I hereby c tityy that this acw.E • — was a ccee Cy me,or order y direct:were! 1"=20, ASSOCIATES, INC, °d'; the'dw Licensed Land.Survey'under �� the bws of the State of titimesota. CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND 5-18-22 SURVEYORS SITE PLANNERS 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE / r� -/ JOB NO. LONG LAKE,MN.55356 .O .rJ.6 I lr. 22-063A 952-473-4141 Mork S.Gronben; Mtmesoto Licen Number 12755 22-063A • A ITOIC1'FOp, '-05'" \5� \ 5 b; \C, TN 2815 CASCO )01\1 FOAb k o 1t›.. 1 i Of?0\O Mk 55391 _ _ LQW�t LFV�L,1363 SQ,Ft, rrililMAMI ISIM rn�EMAIVIIMIhilr.. MAN LFVEL:1363 SQ,Ft _ kw" ti Yi*' jiggling 11111406 GAkAGF 660 5Q,Ft filP - StiTM [PP�fz LEV�L,191�5Q,r1 rnY�Ik It, 1 IA� y g , _AiMITus `..- Ik I 1 1 1 A. -- - I 1 1 1 hh(lh_ ., �I ° I� - 1 i II I I I' Q [ !"? 111 2 FM,PA 8/15/2022 - _ 1 wii=l1 I R I 121 NM II1 '1 1*��JI ® ® 24"ADDED TO DEPTH 00I _-I- OF GARAGE 5fer atis 0I 4110 E-M-F----72:71711-Wilt;§- kl\ z "(f7 0 iu ,7-7-7-7.17-1-7E7=r51.21Zrz- 1 g ..,.,....,,y,............, 1 -.1ileftlleiliiii -lait.Er.,7ravE,,..,„--,...mrszzrsgra.. __. ii-r",,....VIIIIMMIERMINIVIMMININIVili... m AsPHALT sHINGLES(TIP) ---''' -= -7-fili:r841,1111111111114° V14.4114141--..-.7:---- e- ,...,-,•..— .....„-i- I" a W g 111 1 .1 fo'LVZI rZtg, if,1 I 1111 us .-, - - --- , - _ _ _ - .• -.-, 7 / 7 -/ -7 - _ tfi i CEDAR sNAKE mom(FIR) •I 0 - g R.SEE 2 FOR SETH. I tiprimpwripumillimpimigusimminionamilutupplipiNIIMIUMINIMMIIIIIIIIIIMIIIMIMIT I 2- 7- k 5 1111 I 1 5/4"Ae.FAFSONITE TRIP BOARDS(,,, / I El . VAA.TOP oN TAC > WARD ANO akr.soNo OW) /IA L'''ED ToT°P II 0014 FRONT :-.- rWl.vie. 8"TYP 8/15/= --saw--mu TRIMMED 2,10.CEDAR JOISTS 6 ;2 SEE DETAIL a FOR PROMS DETAILS 562 1 1 . LaDERIOARD 1,a12.CEDAR DEW TRIMMED ENOS SET POST TO CONCRETE PIER W/ 'SIMPSON•POST BASE TOP. MIN.1/2'0 X 1.-2T LG.A.B.(BENT) OR SET 1/2'X 7 1/2T LG.A.B.(OR A SIMPSON"IXPT BOLT 1/2.0 X 7 1/2')WIN EPDXY GROUT INTO 5"RADIUS A FrAS.CEDAR POST 5/8'0 HOLE A SOT I 1: . ir , :., . .• ., FINISH GRADE VA•I 12-0 CONCRETE PIER At BELOW GRADE -5'RADIUS '' -2N10.CEDAR BEAM ENO PROFILES A A 22-OB fter ©PERGOLA WALKWAY ©POST CONNECTION ®CEDAR BEAM PROFILES 2 SCALE:1/4,-I.-0" SCALE:I 1j2* 1'-0. SCALE:I 1/2..e-0" CI 0 AfEl5 • • N z N Ill fl n g Mr 1.4 .4.404,0.05.0 .- --:11 ',.. _ r 2i ; __ 6 RENOVE ExlsT�c F.,,.— _ srxlRc DAMAGED = s s a =Iwll�i�l�1=i=l=i p�wE\m\Rw. E > ■1■ 44 \� n�� Hui . ., R Q ' a " ��Ei . R 6 „ ei r:, As -. -- II ,-I � I � � � II V � II n \ . O L- L .VAS h E�-seas• ill r:. _._. 111111 .I _ iIRST HOOK MIME ■ )11' lk , EL 888.E ■r�■1 ------ ---- • -- 6 LULL REAR RAI 2 ., 2 ffEr c,ti 0 • UN z kA 11.1 fl "` N " 0 _ _ __ i 1 -- _ �- - -- __- _ - _- _- _ B L iii.H zz :I I __ _v\ vNi E7, ...... illi 0 IL '' E le -r a s jiMyspojesune 1NYJf8'i1rtYNN1<11h1i'iNMWO EXISTING 8/15/2022 4) crtnoE/cwAGE an p 24"ADDED TO DEPTH EL 9!!'4, ri cae.> Qi OF GARAGE GRADE 0 cn.OE vEn SURVEY 8(8//{2022 0 6,AI WEST RIN.: 2onz Mt 4 an W-t5 • z fl ., kiN vR mw 0 i I - - T 6 s 1 -LI i ; i 0 1 < / ii 1 ......trm, i ! MMNII oo< 6 iln �..__.._... _____ ...__. ____— , � r ,d II, ,i,r�lr1 •®�� E ®� a L 0 _. �� nay vuu E aE>., 8/olPAIE 2 4� ----_ nRs*RR$ r/ ® ® 136)2 GRIDE/GARAGE 24' ADDED TO DEPTH 'NOS REm EwmNc arouR° l At Qi OF GARAGE FOOTPRINT we ewuaRcs ELEVATION Al ses.7 0 _ 1 EAST R.M14z non SECT a e HEM 0 • ANCHOR o BOLTS: • E I/6.DIA.X 10•LONG ANCHOR BOLTS 0 S'-0.0.C.. •BE USEpM ERE INSSTTOAJ1O ANNCHO"STRONG DO NOT MEET THEE'AGAINE CRITERIA.µ uAr G w1r1. A 10-1• t-6 ]' 6-6' 2-6• 13-6 8-0 , 23-6 , D- r ] I.-4i CORE FILL El• kn ! S REMOVE Ewmxc f""•""" "1 ` HOOWALLS .0 K oaISTs x l'c, = II£/EL FOUNDATION Nu DAORY TION Z I I AND INSTALL NEN 41 Ell I = FLOOR JOISTS TO m I Aac s ro eE FLaav CORE num CR N I REINfORCEO TO CT L J auFaI NEa 1I u z POST St BEAUS I� Fr ____,l _ \ I• n 1 1_0 A. `� , I C___ ,.1 II I 3 - ____ _I .: ) I I 4 L�----=-U Ili I NEW GARAGE e A 2 & L . '� QC ,ti.ar 1 1 1 1 1 vii 8 100 F I . ID A-- _23'-6•+/--•.ERIFr - _- II 1 E F 1..11 I I OP '' `�� & f - I FRONT • _ PORCH i —, e `f Kl 6� —— Ic e•caxc.SAN 10 ® QT .,,CONC.BLR. I- I 3 • NF ELEVATION ro NATCIHT �•• f✓EfE EXISTING 1ST FLOOR Nf ` I I 6•Si CONC BIH. J , SAZ R \"*"\.. I_� n •,I 1-4OF _E ��� R1K PAM L I� . ::A r 8/15/2022 ILL JJ m ` © © l o D DEMO PLAN [7 �'o 24'ADDED TO DEPTH GENERAL NOTES: L OF GARAGE - •PROVIDE TEMPORARY BRACING AT ALL EXISTING WALLS, FLOORS,CEILINGS,ETC.BEING REMOVED AS NEEDED - *PROVIDE TEMPORARY WEATHERPROOFING IN ALL AREAS DURING CONSTRUCTION I,. - •REMOVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS DAILY(RECYCLE AS REQUIRED) - *REMOVE ALL BRICK. VERIFY WITH OWNER IF ANY QUESTIONS *REMOVE BOTH FIREPLACES. SUPPORT AND PATCH ALL OPENINGS PRIOR TO REROOFING . •REMOVE ALL LAYERS OF ROOFING ON EXISTING SECOND STORY.PATCH AND REPAIR AS NEEDED PRIOR TO REROOFING - *VERIFY WITH OWNER IF ROOF AND TRUSSES ARE BEING REPLACED 1:91011 . \ PLAN*: *REMOVE ROOF.WALLS AND FLOOR ON SINGLE STORY SECTION.PROVIDE TEMPORARY WEATHERPROOFING *REMOVE EXISTING WINDOWS AND DOORS.PATCH ALL OPENINGS NOT BEING REUSED. VERIFY WITH PLANS B�\\ 22'0,71 *REMOVE EXISTING STAIRWAY. PROVIDE SAFE ACCESS TO ALL FLOORS DURING CONSTRUCTION Ser *LAYOUT NEW WALLS AND DEMO ANY EXISTING WALLS NOT BEING REUSED KEY 6 QVR MI5 III • N , V 4" /}III T-6' 8'-9' 2'-6' 2'-11' 6'-6" /I1 12'-0' `II 23'-6" S. 'n j © UN, J Y b ,..- i N 6"A6"SUPPORT POST 19 u LY n \l'9 _ 1 g ~^I r 1;d 11 • PAmNG ® n 14-6. N 3-3/ 3'B I I II G8 11 I1 DW il Ogg 11 1 I' "' ty-u, ( Y� G� ii �ii ',, 42E0 SF WONDER. ABOVE, q„� ,,LL z 11 L__J I y ❑. FASTDIED TO POSTS n-n �� 0 is; I 1 r__ii - , W/SWIPwN GERS aN L L q, q CS y1y.L� AAPRUED E0. } _V I Big! m � 11 1 Z t 0_] y.2.�y Cu,SD 3 ii 1 `` 11 ® �,§ NEW GARAGE 1 11 ' LB `—' ® c Y .pTo,sOruRs II 660 SF I 1 —IT - _I II I too I i t 11 Z 3$' w I 1 1 io r9i �F-= F- L 11 L 11 !II ry �_j i1E 30 7L :8 g8 11 ¶slzEn ar LsmsDWorq __1 o- 1 MD f�; 'i 11 11 L�C Gs ii iiKk n 3z — 9 606 ii 1t „1" _ Nil 14'-O" 21'-6" 1 ® �ggE55 11 11 9L 21 Ce3 L lI 1�L n L.........r• ,. y1y3O. a'6. 0 0 21 zD ii i1 z Q ag ' " T' " F 2'6"� 4'-O" 1 L^ 26 �'JI - �^ ♦ 'r\ PLAN.D/9� VIEWING GAS ~ 1 " 8/15/2022 FIREPLACE C$ L �__>p lit al,,4'-0"VERIFY, 7,-I" )'-1" I 6'-le 1 6'-11" I 6'-11' , 3'-9" , M/8%IA 2022 , 36'-6" 6 7-6" , 24'-0" , 9/6 2022 1 6 66_0 , 24"ADDED TO DEPTH GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES: OF GARAGE • NEW ROOF RAFTERS/LOURS JOISTS TO BE HELD DOWN WTI"HURRICANE CUPS'AS REWIRED. •"WMPSCN"HANGERS OR APPROVED EQUAL USED AT ALL LOCATCVS SPECIFIED OR REQUIRING HANGERS(EXISTING CONSTRUCRIN WI.IS FLUSH FRAMED TO A AALL HEADERS VE �4INGlE ATE SIMPSON WNDOW HANGERS(2)2GOBS W/1/2•RCD INSULAR.LACH T . 2Y6'S BCN LOEG DORM TO SCUD BEARING BELOW W/(2)2%4'S AND(1)224 6�1Y ' NWG STUD AT EACH WOE •ALL HEADERS DOUBLE CR 1RIPLE WINDOW LINTS(OR SLIDING DOORS):(2)1 3/4"2 9 1/2"LW'S BLOC,.DOWN TO SOUR BEARING BELOW W/40 POSTS AND 0)ma KING STUD AT EACH SIDE. ' • POSTS SPECIS TO BE TRUE.1.OR 626.(2)OR(3)LYS NOT ALLOW.(UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) •PROVIDE 226 cow. o p RES AT EACH R.R.AT ROOFS(2/3-i/3 RILE) \ • ORED IN TRUSSES.LAMINATED VENEER LUMBER,CLUE-LAMINATED MEMBERS OR I-JOISTS ARE NOT PERMITTED UNLESS THE ■ \\\ RMIW EFFECTS O ARE SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED. MIMI • WALLS WITH PLATES CUT,DRILLED OR NOTCHED MORE.AN SOX OF THE WOTH OF THE STUD.ALL HAVE A GALVANIZED METAL TIE 16 GAGE AND I O1 IN..I t µ1 RIDE FASTENED TO EACH/LATE. \\ 22'OYA7 •EXTERIOR OR LOAD APING WALLS STIRS DRILLED WTNIN 5 6"OF THE FACE CF THE STUD SHALL BE REINFORCED WITH A STRUCTURAL STUD SHOE. T KEY 7 a.a5T5 III 0 z , ' RN K1 1'-0• T-8' 24"FULL HT U\ m'' -.{6 - I-• tt I 1- 1' t1 2r=.3. A CABINET ADDED 3 z INN y 1 CI i (O 16 0 18 19 z _ , , n Z O OO N { 0 f ) N � i i . -_'r Ln n'--.._.....___- p �yy 7\ 0 Y 11 12 O h N' n d A •_ I , in tiD Q _ iiiim.'! 5_i• n O rnn ❑u -_ Iii _-- nnmrt LJ WA • • T 101 - i m HG�G m �_ I.NT OYFA FRONT PORCHGWOR RECESSED a Li ® ` MOVE o -ew �� a oiIIL EXIST.DECK m c O Q O � ___ 3'-9- 3'-, 1, 5-10' 11" i, 75-9• FM.PM- -- 191M--- - ..i 0 ally/ion n- n re 6oNEi_ ll((77lCLL� 9/ SECOND FLOOR PLAN A 24"ADDED TO DEPTH - OF GARAGE ADDITION - GENERAL NOTES: •PROVIDE TEMPORARY BRACING AT ALL EXISTING WALLS.FLOORS,CEILINGS, ETC.BEING REMOVED AS NEEDED ily •PROVIDE TEMPORARY WEATHERPROOFING IN ALL AREAS DURING CONSTRUCTION •REMOVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS DAILY(RECYCLE AS REQUIRED) •REMOVE ALL BRICK.VERIFY WITH OWNER IF ANY QUESTIONS ' *REMOVE BOTH FIREPLACES.SUPPORT AND PATCH ALL OPENINGS PRIOR TO REROOFING *REMOVE ALL LAYERS OF ROOFING ON EXISTING SECOND STORY.PATCH AND REPAIR AS NEEDED PRIOR TO REROOFING e •VERIFY WITH OWNER IF ROOF AND TRUSSES ARE BEING REPLACED R.PI *REMOVE ROOF,WALLS AND FLOOR ON SINGLE STORY SECTION.PROVIDE TEMPORARY WEATHERPROOFING \ \ 22-032 •REMOVE EXISTING WINDOWS AND DOORS.PATCH ALL OPENINGS NOT BEING REUSED. VERIFY WITH PLANS ��\\ AiEEf *REMOVE EXISTING STAIRWAY. PROVIDE SAFE ACCESS TO ALL FLOORS DURING CONSTRUCTION '---'— *LAYOUT NEW WALLS AND DEMO ANY EXISTING WALLS NOT BEING REUSED KEY 8 LFa%VS 4110 • N z i� - ��\\�,I r I / 0 T_ (Wmy RR r-- 6fr- , , ' IL -1 Z 12 ♦♦♦♦ Ai 6 1- AV ♦I% I 12 ♦ L__12 g 1- 6 ,. Al OR ,EMI I hT THE E AREA OF ROOF F PIGGYBACK THE REQUIRE O SEE TO�RART E ` Y THE USE OF OCOF TRUSSES TO MACE E P `. L O u� NEW P INTEGRITY OF ROOF.OP. HY STRUCTURALSTRUCTURE BEFORE ORDERING. HE DUSTING ROOFSAL ' f R • - • • - .. • • - FIIM.DAIS: 6/15/2022 u • 24"ADDED TO DEPTH ��L(1,"_CJL Qi OF GARAGE '[> 70 ROOF PLAN ' GENERAL NOTES: •PROVIDE TEMPORARY BRACING AT ALL EXISTING WALLS, FLOORS,CEILINGS,ETC.BEING REMOVED AS NEEDED - •PROVIDE TEMPORARY WEATHERPROOFING IN ALL AREAS DURING CONSTRUCTION • *REMOVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS DAILY(RECYCLE AS REQUIRED) " •REMOVE ALL BRICK. VERIFY WITH OWNER IF ANY QUESTIONS •REMOVE BOTH FIREPLACES. SUPPORT AND PATCH ALL OPENINGS PRIOR TO REROOFING • •REMOVE ALL LAYERS OF ROOFlNG ON EXISTING SECOND STORY. PATCH AND REPAIR AS NEEDED PRIOR TO REROOFING -' •VERIFY WITH OWNER IF ROOF AND TRUSSES ARE BEING REPLACED i'°- �` *REMOVE ROOF, WALLS AND FLOOR ON SINGLE STORY SECTION.PROVIDE TEMPORARY WEATHERPROOFING v-on •REMOVE EXISTING WINDOWS AND DOORS.PATCH ALL OPENINGS NOT BEING REUSED. VERIFY WITH PLANS _ _ •REMOVE EXISTING STAIRWAY. PROVIDE SAFE ACCESS TO ALL FLOORS DURING CONSTRUCTION KEY 9 •LAYOUT NEW WALLS AND DEMO ANY EXISTING WALLS NOT BEING REUSED CP IA 1£65 1111 0 v\ Z 1/43 kil lu N g g 5 s,14' Z 1 i g 1 g E • , i[iy 7r." i I 1 Ilim ii 11 ti 11 ,1 li A BY SUMMER REED SIZED ay.SUPPLIER jt.„.... „ye' rg...,,,,,,,.....=..r v.....••., h h , ii i P h li II li II II ii ' ' 11 AL_A_ I HEADER SIZED BY SUPPLER , II HEADER SUED BY SUPPLIER , [1 Ei IE I ,---:_- 10.Nr GARAGE DOOR ,,!El War GARAGE DOOR :,: :R ,.. . ,ii i 8/19/2022 ALLI . . . . 6 136)2 . _ L,..m.. L' I,. j ....=,,,=7...,:to,-1.:....1 ,..:................— 1, "1 . /41.11......10,211=10,014,...110111.102,01.83 • ilt.W.1170.411/oWbrernVISVIIM,11.1)••••21.11•17=117/0.71.,..,R.I.M8•1 • ,ir,,,.,....,..‘..4frh.M.%..,,.....r.,...f.........:,....,..Z.r......=,....., AAA Mall.”010.001,4•04.2N•a•f*Ilwr....43.01.106..1 • • • • PUN*I 22-0,2 14X-1 I 0 MI,94115 0 • 2 s mU r NEW NAND RULING OE ROGYBOEN ROOF . 'MUSSES. VERIFY WrIN OWNER tfi i 1 • • �NQY OR DM.NIP ROOF Wi11.Y5. MIFF WON OVIHEIi z 1 I ss 0 t 2'-2' , n r ® II t JINN 7- N I fl 1 N N N l i J l l F v 5rv ' 230 -0' 0 nas*aoa ryf � '7 wn2ces0Lwx\ 8/15/2071 I I N N �i nor M z,._iD. f ... pi 7' v. IA % 71 EL 9S9]' 24"ADDED TO DEPTH L°"E"'LOOK1 • b OF GARAGE ADDITION - 22 I 4401 1 cRIB 4415 0 • kn z r—, r-ar }""r"`{ —t"-{ WINDOW ANDERSEN SERIES 400 OPTIONS WINDOW SCHEDULE \S ( AA 0 I '.L' '('1 V1.2 NO. REMARKS SIZE(ARR) HEAD HEIGHT MODEL DIAGRAM DETAIL MULLED SCREEN LOW-E ]' µY I 2•-8•x 5'-D• 6'-6' CX15R AVE YES YES YES W/CUSTOM ARCH ABOVE. SEE ELEVATIONS UN mar m�a 2 5'-0•x 5'-D- 6•-8• P5050 F/E - YES - YES W/CUSTOM ARCH ABOVE. SEE ELEVATIONS IA c 3 2•-8'x 5'-0" 6•-8• Cx15L A/E - YES YES YES W/CUSTOM ARCH ABOVE. SEE ELEVATIONS H z 4 3'-6'x 3•-6- 6•-8' CN235 B - - YES YES - 1 5 J'-I•x 5'-0" 6.-8- CWJS C - - YES YES r'est_1 } 6 T'-I"x 4•-4' 6'-8• CW345 C - - YES YES - ry1 -'Y `� L Z 2-D•x 2-O• s•-N" A21 0 - - YES YES i/ (❑ _Irli A21 D = = YES YES = .NNNNNN L 1�--• • • r-0" ' - A21 D YES YES o L R c 10 2.-1'x 5'-O" W-8" CW35 C - - YES YES - 11 2'-8'x 5'-0' 6'-13• CX15R AR - - TES YES - Z 12 2•-8-a 5•-0' 6•-8- CX15L A - - YES YES - .r 'IN A21 0 - - YES YES - OW DIAGRAMS 1 Jt !C WIDOW .! 14 2'-0-x 2'-0' 6'-8" A21 0 - - YES YES - .ve SW IS z'-0•x 2'-0" 6'-8" A21 D - - YES YES - 18 2'-8'x 4•-0• 6'-8• CX14R M - - YES YES - GENERAL WINDOW NOTES: 17 2.-6•x 4'-0" 6•-8' CIO AL A - - YES YES •CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WALL THICKNESS,SILL,JAMB AND HEAD REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO ORDERING WWDOwS(VERIFY EXTERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLIES 18 2'-8'x 4•-0- 6•-8' CX14R M - - YES YES - ANU PRONOE APPROPRIATE EXTENSION JANES) 19 2'-8-a 4'-0" 6'-8' CX14L A - - YES YES - g •BID ALL WINDOWS AS ANDERSON 400 SERIES(OR APPROVED EQUAL) 20 2-0's 2-0' 6-8' A21 0 - - YES lES•ALL GLASS TO BE LOW-E ARGON FILLED CAN,(MIN.U VALUE TO BE.30) - p •WINDOW SUPPLIER TO PROVIDE PROPER HARDWARE TO MULL UNITS TOGETHER AS 21 2'-0'x 2'-0' 6'-8' A21 D - - YES YES w INDICATE 9[ •ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS TO HAVE WOOD EXTENSION JAMBS PROVIDE TYPICAL 22 2-0'x 2'-0' 6'-8' A21 D - - YES YES - SILL WITH STOOL AT ALL WINDOWS •WINDOWS AND DOORS TO HAVE INTERIOR TRIM TO MATCH(STAINED). 2J 2-0'v 2'-0' 6'-8' A21 D - - YES YES - (z1( •BASEBOARDS THROUGHOUT HOUSE TO MATCH EXISTING(STAINED). 24 ]•-I"x 4'-6" 6•-8' CW345 C - - YES YES - pT • •ALL WINDOW HARDWARE BID AS STANDARD WIRE(VERIFY WITH HOMEOWNER PRIOR 25 3'-4'x 4'-0' 6=8• P3540 G - YES - YES NULLED ABOVE 26 Y TO ORDERING).DOOR HARDWARE TO BE VERIFIED WITH HOMEOWNER BID AS DARK S� RUBBED BRONZE. 28 3'-4'x 1'-9' AN351 G YES YES YES nn ¢ •ALL DOOR SWINGS AND OR OPERATION TO BE VERIFIED WITH HOMEOWNER. b' 6 •ALL DOORS REQUIRE SCHUCE ERI AND MATCHING HINGES. SEE FLOOR 27 3•-A"x 4'-0' 6'-e' P3540 G YES YES MULLED ABOVE 28 PLANS FOR DOOR SIZES AND SWINGS.VERIFY WITH OWNERS FOR COLOR AND TB J'-4•x 1'-9" AN351 0 YES YES YES ill •STYLE. 29 3•-4'a 4'-0" 6'-8" P3540 C - YES - YES MULLED ABOVE 30 ANY NEW WINDOWS IN ILL BEDROOMS IN A BASEMENT MEET AND EXCEED 5.7 50. FT.EGRESS CODE(SIMPLY BY OPENING A WINDOW). A MIN.CLEAR OPENING OF 30 3'-4'x 1'-B' - AN351 G - YES YES YES - SN 20",A MIN.CLEAR HEIGHT OF 24',AND A SILL HEIGHT OF LESS THAN 44 INCHES 31 3'-{'a 4'-0' 6'-B' P3540 G - lES - YES MULLED ABOVE 32 NAVE FINISHED FLOOR SHALL BE MAINTAINED.BASEMENT EGRESS WINDOW SIMILAR. •FOLLOW ALL 2039 ITC TEMPERING REQUIREMENTS(SECTION 308)IN AU_ 32 3'-4'x 1'-9' - AN351 G - YES YES YES - HAZARDOUS AREAS(STAIRWAYS,BATHROOMS.ETC.)V.I.F. 33 3'-4"a 4•-0" 6•-8" P3540 G - YES - YES MULLED ABOVE 34 AN351 G - YES YES YES - 35 3'-4•x 4'-0" 6'-8" P3540 G - YES - YES MULLED ABOVE 36 AN351 G - YES YES YES - 37 2•-4•x 5'-0" 6.-13• CWISR M - - YES YES VHF EXIST MASONRY OPENING AFT BRICK REMOVAL ,}�i 38 2'-4'a 5'-0' 8'-B" CW15L A - - YES YES WF EXIST MASONRY OPENING AFT BRICK REMOVAL 39 4'-0•x J'-4' 6'-B• C235 B - - YES YES - PM DAIS: A31 0 - - YES YES - 8/15/2022 A31 D - - YES YES - Cw33 C - - YES YES VIF EXIST MASONRY OPENING AFT BRICK REMOVAL 43 _X_ _ _ - - _ - _ _ NOTES:1.THE WINDOW CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE TEMPERED GLASS WHERE REQUIRED BY CODE. 2.THE WINDOW CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL FLASHING MID CAULK AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE JOB. 3.THE COLOR OF THE FRAME IS TO BE VERIFIED WITH THE OWNER. 4.SIZES AND MODELS ARE ANDERSEN SERIES 400 OR E0. FLAN K: 22-039 9D8f 12 MD 98615 • • V\ z DOOR SCHEDULE DOOR DESCRIPTIONANOER6EN fl A NO. REMARKS612E(WAR) DIAGRAM MATERIAL MODEL/ HINGE QUANTITY 001 3'-05x6'-87 B WOOD - I I - S el100 16'-0•x7'-0• J INS - - I INSULATED OVERHEAD DOOR W/WINOOW I 1 101 8'-Tar-05 H INS - - 1 INSULATED OVERHEAD DOOR W/VANDOW 102 3'-0'v8'-8• G WOOD - L I W/SIOENGHT 103 6'-0•x6'-87 _ G WOOD FWG6068R R 1 W/SCREEN 104 3'-0%6'-85 B WOOD - L 1 I HR RATED 200 6'-0•x6'-85 G WOOD FWG6068L L I W/SCREEN 3-0 3'-05v6'-85 A WOOD INTERIOR R 2 - 3-0 3'-O•xR'-8• A WOOD INTERIOR l 2 - 2-8 2'-8616'-85 A WOOD INTERIOR 1 2 - IllIpppp Z 2-6 2'-5AR'-8' A WOOD INTERIOR R 4 - : 2-6 2'-6"x6"-85 A WOOD INTERIOR L 2 - 2-6 2'-616'-85 A WOOD INTERIOR POCKET 3 - 2-4 2'-416"-65 A WOOD INTERIOR L 1 - ❑ — 'I. 2-4 2'-4 6.-87 A WOOD INTERIOR POCKET 1 = , , 1-0 1'-0'v6'-8' A WOOD INTERIOR BIFOLD 1 yy,,�T 1-6 1'-6•x6'-8• A WOOD INTERIOR BIFOLO 1 V E F a K A 4-0 4'-O'v8'-8• A WOOD INTERIOR BIFOLD 3 - Z DOORA DIAGRAMS 5-0 5'-05A6'-5' A WOOD INTERIOR BIFOLO 1 - 1Ofnau mama a a 6-0 8'-OAO'-8• A WOOD INTERIOR BIFOLD 2 - 9L 1 YA'Y-T 1-1iy TAT g i-n NOTES:1.ALL DXTERIOR DOORS ARE ANDERSEN STRAIGHRINE ENTRY DOORS OR APPROVED EQ. .1� 4 2.THE DOOR CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE TEMPERED GLASS WHERE REQUIRED BY CODE. 2.SLAB TYPE,COLOR OF DOOR.FRAME AND HARDWARE TO BE DETERMINED BY OWNER. 4.DOOR PROVIDER MUST MEET ALL APPLICABLE CODES. i g 0 2 3 5.EACH OVERHEAD DOOR TO HAVE IT'S 0WN WIF1 ENABLED GARAGE DOOR OPENER INSTALLED.VERIFY BRAND W/OWNER. Im. 6.ALL DOORS TO BE SET 4$FROM CORNER OR IN THE CENTER OF THE WALL UNLESS NOTED. FRAME DIAGRAMS I;vim., 7.VERIFY ALL DETAILS,QUANTITIES,SWINGS.ETC.PRIOR TO ORDERING CS 111 O$ I gl ..=.f.:77�. �.�..e_, �\w. .......o:.,,m BARRIER RESISINE `,d.....®,. a. i .._ .-"...,'''"" i� z • so ° �. �I °—,41 ----. . ............skl... , �� mRam TYPICAL HEADER DETAIL „T _ .Aa Ww `` <°'"°° , SILL PLATE •.7,......-.7„--..---.......m.-.4.0----• —0,------ 2 Nng''''''''''' •r,„--grzr,...—,:grom..---- -' WINDOW/DOOR ROUGH-OPENING WATERPROOFING WRAP 4v TYPICAL EXTERIOR CORNER 22-0,9 5101 13 OF 11 Setts PC Exhibit K Price 2813 Casco Pt Rd Revised Comments Melanie Curtis September 15, 2022 Planner- City Of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Charles and Carol Price 2813 Casco Point Rd Wayzata, MN 55391 Regarding: • Proposed House Drawings for Thostensen Residence at 2015 Casco Point Rd., VARIANCE SET, Dated 8/17/2022, Sheets 1-15. • Certificate of Survey for Lisa Thostenson, dated 5/18/2022 • Hardcover Calculation Worksheet, dated 8/15/2022 • Hardcover Calculation Worksheet-Alternate, dated 8/15/2022 • Practical Difficulties Analysis,Updated-August 16,2022 • Variance Application Narrative,Updated August 16, 2022 Dear Ms. Curtis, We have reviewed the documents listed above and we hereby provide this assessment. • House Modifications We hereby request that no new encroachments are permitted on the west side of the subject property in which the existing house is currently into the 7.5 feet side set back requirement. It appears that the kitchen bay window has been enlarged with a corresponding larger roof overhang than currently exists. Additionally, it appears that the roof overhang has been enlarged over the side bump out that is structurally part of the existing house footprint. We are opposed to the proposed new gable roof over the existing house that encroaches further into the 7.5 feet side setback. We request that any proposed new roof line will not encroach any further into the 7.5 foot side setback. The side setback rules allow for light, air, and open space between adjacent homes that is necessary for the enjoyment and safety of our property. New Lakeside Deck The proposed deck on the lake side of the house will create a severe hardship for us and our property. Instead of our current unimpeded lake view, our view will be blocked by this elevated deck, and everything placed on it which the applicants describe as an "outdoor living space/deck". There are many reasons why this deck should not be approved: it is illegal per the city building codes, setback requirements, and lakeshore hardcover requirements, and it does not fit into the well-established ambiance of the neighborhood. The deck and the things on it would block our view of the lake for a large portion of our view, it would destroy the quiet enjoyment of our home and yard, and the lights and glare would be irritating inside our home. It can be assumed that such an "outdoor living space/deck" would be equipped with sofas, chairs, tables, grills, lights, sound, umbrellas, etc. This large outdoor living space may 411 lead to loud noise from the large number of people this deck can accommodate. Even worse, any people on the deck will be able to look directly into our living room which has a wall of • glass facing the lake and a large window facing across the applicants' yard to the lake view. This deck and everything on it will be constantly in our view and will obscure our lake view. • It can also be foreseen that there will be lighting added to this deck which will create light and glare directly into our living room through our wall of glass on our lakeside windows and our side windows that face this property. We and our neighbors have always enjoyed and valued the quiet enjoyment of our lakeside properties and yards without irritating sound or glaring light, but this proposed "outdoor living space/deck"will destroy said quiet enjoyment by day and quiet dark skies by night. It is clear that this proposed deck solves no "hardship" for the applicants, but it creates a huge hardship for us and our neighbors. We love our house and the environment here at our Orono lakeside property. We don't want to leave our home, but the thought of living with this illegal "outdoor living space/deck" is unfathomable compared to our current backyard ambiance. We generally keep our windows open most all summer long and we don't want to hear our neighbor's sound system, or a deck full of loud partiers. This property already has a substantial patio that has served previous owners well.....there is no hardship that requires any expansion of the existing outdoor living space. Approving this "outdoor living space/deck" will adversely affect our comfort, safety and health. There is no demonstrable difficulty that makes this deck variance necessary nor should this deck be allowed to violate the hardcover and lake shore setback rules. The applicants'wish for this deck is clearly just a convenience for the applicants. The conditions on this lot are not at all unusual in a hilly topography that was laid out and developed long ago. The plight of the landowner is directly caused by their • wish for a deck in a prohibited area,having nothing to do with the circumstances of the property or any practical difficulties. Any variance for a deck would make a major change to the locality, and such decks have consistently not been allowed in the past. Several years ago, we attempted to have our detached garage attached to our house but after the design phase and surveys, we were told by the City of Orono to "come back and talk to us when your plans include getting your hard cover down to 25%." Our next door neighbor had the same experience. Properties nearby have had such decks refused and no homes nearby have such decks. Approving this variance would be groundbreaking in this locality. We have noticed that the proposed deck drawings do not show any stairway from the deck to the ground level for access to the back yard and lake. If a deck stairway is added,the most likely place would be close to our property since the deck is above the grade the least,and the stairs would further impede our lake view. This stairway is not included in the hardcover calculations. We hereby ask the City of Orono to deny the average lakeshore setback and hardcover variances for this proposed deck. New Garage Addition While we understand a 3-car garage is desirable over a 2-car garage,we do not believe the 3- car garage on such a small width lot conforms to the character of the neighborhood. The house view from the street is essentially a three-car garage. We request that a variance shall • only be granted if the overall proposed garage, house plans, and deck plans strictly meet and adhere to all city codes, structural coverage and massing standards,the hardcover requirements, and the side setback requirements. Regarding the narrative dated August 16, 2022 The minimum existing side setback to our property is 4.8', not 6.9'as stated. Several comments that a wire rope or glass panels will "further help preserve views" is not applicable considering the large scale of this deck, all the supporting structures, side supports, and deck elevation from ground level. The deck will spoil our view along with all of the furniture, grills, fire pit tables, umbrellas and people on the deck that will be only 22 feet from our lakeside windows and directly between us and our view of Lake Minnetonka. The hardcover calculations spreadsheet dated 8-15-2022 indicates that the "wood landscape border"will be removed; however this is a retaining border wall that is necessary due to the 5' elevation difference between our two lots. These wooden timbers straddle the property line and the survey spikes are placed in the center of these timbers. The wood border is only half on the 2815 property, so there would only be a minimal hardcover reduction if these timbers were removed. We would find it acceptable for the subject property owners to replace the wood landscape border/timber retaining wall with something more aesthetically pleasing to them, so long as it continues to perform the needed retaining wall function and we approve the plan in writing before work on this border starts. However, taking credit for a hardcover reduction is not applicable in this case. . The building codes and hardcover requirements have been put in place for the safety and well being of all citizens in Orono, as well as for the health and preservation of the surrounding land and Lake Minnetonka. We request that the Orono Planners and City Council maintain the ethics and adherence to existing laws and codes and reject the variances requested by the applicant. We would appreciate if the Planners and City Council stand firm and require that the new homeowner provide plans for house modifications that adhere to all city codes, structural coverage and massing standards,the hardcover requirements, and the side setback requirements. Sincerely, Charles Price Carol Price • RECEIVED Price Jul. 06 2022 III Melanie Curtis original comme t ' OF°ROJO,2022 Planner- City Of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Charles and Carol Price , 2813 Casco Point Rd Wayzata,MN 55391 Re: Certificate of Survey for Lisa Thostenson dated May 8,2022,and drawings of proposed changes requiring city variance approvals. Dear Ms. Curtis, We have reviewed the Survey for Lisa Thostenson regardi g the proposed changes to the existing house and lot at 2815 Casco Point Rd. We have a so reviewed preliminary drawings provided by Lisa Thostenson regarding the major modifications to the house, garage,height, deck and lot. Based on this survey and these drawings, w=hereby provide our assessment. House Modifications We oppose the side garage wall on the West side to be bui t build within the 7.5 feet side setback. We oppose any enlargement of the side kitchen window . d any enlargement of the side wall ID"bump out", as these extrusions already violate the 7.5 fee,side setback rules. The existing side wall "bump out" has only 4.8 feet side-setback. We oppose the variance request to build living quarters above the existing patio on the southwest corner of the house. We oppose the proposed house height variance request. T i e rough sketch of the second floor appears to show proposed ceiling heights of 12 feet. We are in opposition to these proposed house changes sin - the resulting structure would be a very tall house shaped like a single block with no relief v. Cations. If the setback rule violations are allowed by the city,the resulting massive structure bui so close to the lot line would create the appearance of a more industrial building look instead of a home, and would be adverse risk factor for privacy,drainage,and fire control due to the close proximity of the houses. It would also adversely affect the sunlight, breezes, and open look e, our front lawn and the front of our home. Garage We oppose the variance to build a new three-car garage att:ched to the front of the house for several reasons. The wall of the west side of the 3-car gar.ge is proposed to be 6.2 feet, which violates the 7.5 foot setback rule and is 15.6 inches too do e to the lot line. We are opposed to adding the garage within the 7.5 foot setback just to folio and maintain the same existing side wall of the home that already violates the 7.5 foot setback requirement. We object to the plan to maintain a single simple wall plane for the house and gara:e wall as that would look more like an industrial building and not a house that is keeping with 1 e character of the neighborhood and • the lot size. This reduction in the side-setback would redu e our light and airflow, and we would ID I be walking to our front door alongside a massive industrial-grade slab of a wall, instead of walking alongside a lawn, as we do now. The survey shows the existing house to have side setbacks of 4.8 feet to 6.2 feet from the westerly lot line. There have been drainage problems in the past between our house and the existing house due to tie very limited side setback of the 2815 house. We believe that any additional new construction must adhere to the existing Orono building codes to maintain proper drainage and fire safety concerns for close proximity of the two houses sharing the same lot line. We oppose the addition of the 3-car garage facing the street side of the house as it appears to consume nearly the entire width of the existing house. Thei proposed front door is shown to be "hidden" behind the garage with a concrete walkway along the side of the garage. This modification alludes to the appearance of a storage buildinlp, not a home. The view from the street is basically shown to be 3 garages. A 3-car garage added to a small house on a small lot does not conform to the look and character of the Casco P int neighborhood in which the majority of houses have 2-car garages with beautiful front ntry ways with porches and front doors highly visible from the street. Examples of lake-sid Casco Point Road homes with lovely front elevations that have been recently approved are: 262 ,2635, 2645, 2649, and 2745. None of these homes have the industrial look of a wall of garage doors facing the street. We oppose the request for a hardcover waiver to build a 3 ar garage and supporting driveway on such a small 0.28 acre lot per the Hennepin County rec rds. A three car garage is not a need, but a convenience, and there is no demonstrable reason w this lot should be granted an exception for a 3-car garage. The existing detached oversi ed 2 car garage has a large concrete • pad that has allowed 6 cars to be parked routinely in the g age and driveway (six drivers in the family). More can be squeezed in for family gatherings. his orientation has allowed for minimal on-street parking along this house and adjacent h uses. So adding a 3-car garage with a minimal, single car-width driveway would likely be a disc vantage by putting more parked cars on the narrow street. Deck Addition We oppose a variance to build any deck along the lake sid- of the house. We especially oppose a 14 ft x 30 ft deck across almost the entire length of the lake side of the house. This is an overly large deck that is not in character with the adjacent homes. We believe our backyard view would be consumed by this very large deck, and would limit our wiew of the lake. Also, the height of the proposed deck seems to be at an unusual elevation that would also serve as a porch cover over the existing basement door(see hardcover note), and he higher elevation above the natural elevation of the lawn would also hinder our lake view. W are also very concerned about the "quiet enjoyment" of our adjacent yard. Our neighbors are mostly quiet and out-of-sight because none of us have large deck "living space" and none of us p ay music outdoors. None of the drawings we have been given show this massive deck and t is only described as length x width in the hardcover spreadsheet. Hardcover The hardcover calculations spreadsheet dated 6-21-2022 indicates that the "wood landscape border" will be removed; however these are actually wood seams that are necessary due to the large elevation difference between our two lots. The midd'e of the subject yard on the lake side 411 is 961', and the lot to the west is 966'. This 5' elevation di`erence is partially taken up by the wooden border which is about 1'high. These wooden time-rs straddle the property line and the survey spikes are placed in the center of these timbers. T s, the wood border is only half on the ill 2815 property, so there would only be a minimal hardcov reduction if these timbers were removed. Moreover,the wood border retains the river roc , dirt and garden plantings to the west of the property. This wooden border straddling the prope y line is needed as the slope of the adjacent yards falls by approximately 6 inches to 2 feet along the border. Thus, removing these timber retaining walls would adversely affect the existing landscaping as nothing would prevent the landscaping and existing garden plantings from falling and eroding towards the subject property. We would find it acceptable for the subject pro rty owners to replace the wood landscape border with something more aesthetically pleasi g to them, so long as it continues to perform the needed retaining wall function and we approv the plan in writing before work on this border starts. The proposed new 3-car garage lists the dimensions as 22'' 30' on the survey, and then "expanded from survey" to be 32' x 24'. We have found other discrepancies between the survey and the hardcover calculations. Our calculation of the existing concrete driveway is 186 sq. ft less than the 1,038 sq. ft listed in the hardcover spreadshei. For this reason, it is difficult to assess the hardcover data when the widths and lengths of i ch calculation are not provided. We would appreciate more detailed drawings of the proposed Mans so that we can better assess the changes. Construction Concerns The survey shows a 2' gap between the driveway and the lit to the west. What will be in this 2' gap? How will the construction crews protect adjacent pr.ys erty features? We are concerned that • work trucks will cut across our brick pavers and damage o driveway. A suggested option would be to put something immovable on the pavers to pr.:, ent damage, or go ahead and cut across the pavers and repair any damage done after const ction is complete. We are also concerned that the existing solid block retaining wall at th driveway could be damaged by driveway removal and replacement. We would like to see *tten plans on how these constructions concerns. as well as noise, and construction •arking will be addressed. Summary We are opposed to any variance being approved related to the subject property for the reasons stated herein. We believe that proposed house and garage odifications are not in keeping with the character and harmony other Casco Point homes. Theproposed street view of the house is consumed by the front facing 3-car garage with a hidden nt entry way that is not appealing from the street, or for the neighbor's view. The overall proposed house plans and deck are not in balance with the neighborhood, nor in balance and charactr of the lot size. Having such a massive structure so close to our home in violation of the s de setback of 7.5 feet would adversely affect our safety and enjoyment of our property. While we welcome improvements to the existing 2815 home, we believe all of these additions . d modifications can be accomplished within the Orono building codes. The oversized reach of t ese plans violates the city building codes and there is no demonstrable need to build such al. te imposing structure on a small narrow lot. The garage increases from a 2-car detached to ; 3-car attached garage, and the proposed deck is almost the entire width of the house. All .f these variance requests to accommodate these changes are not demonstrably necess. i to live and enjoy the property as the fact remains that the previous homeowners raised 4 active d engaging children in the home as it stands now! 1111 • The building codes and hardcover requirements have bee put in place for the safety and well being of all citizens in Orono, as well as for the health an. preservation of the surrounding land and Lake Minnetonka. We request that the Orono Planne . and City Council maintain the ethics and adherence to existing laws and codes and reject the v. 'ances requested by the new homeowner. We would appreciate if the Planners and Ci Council stand firm and require that the new homeowner provide plans for house modification that adhere to all city codes, structural coverage and massing standards,hardcover req rements, and setback requirements. Sincerely, G I u 2 a Charles Price Carol Price • • Byrne Comments To the City of Orono, 2817 Casco Pt Rd As the owner of the property located at 2817 Casco Point Road, I am writing you in regards to the application for variances proposed for the adjacent property at 2815 Casco Point Road. I have spoken with the new owner of the subject property, Lisa Thostenson, who sent me some dimensionless drawings of the building plans. At that time, I expressed support for removing the old two-car garage located next to the street. Upon further investigation into the specifics of the application for variances, I have a concern with the requested Hardcover variance relative to the average setback from the lake. Stormwater management is particularly important for us and for our area neighbors located on a 25-foot-high bluff overlooking Lake Minnetonka. I have found that the deeper soil structure here in this area contains layers of clay. The clay reduces the speed at which stormwater can diffuse down through the soil and away from the surface. This leads to flooding of our basements and more importantly,has likely contributed to several catastrophic landslides of our bluff over the last 35 years. These slides destroy structures, docks and boats located near the shoreline as they permanently reshape the bluff. The requested hardcover variance is of particular concern because the proposed property modifications increase the hardcover located toward the bluff. The planned outdoor living space located along the lakeside edge of the house is only 60 feet back from the bluff. It would tend to focus more stormwater toward the bluff and toward my property, which is at a lower elevation. • The extent of this focusing effect would be specific to the particular design of this outdoor living space,which is not completely clear in the drawings I have viewed. The elevation contours in the land survey indicate no attempt to prevent stormwater from flowing into my property. In fact,the survey indicates the intention to remove the"Wood Landscape Border" at the southeast edge between our properties. These railroad ties currently form a retaining wall that channels stormwater to a drain located at that corner where the water is piped down to the shoreline. I would request that the outdoor living space design, as well as the yard elevation contours be modified in such a way as to minimize the potential for any added stormwater to flow toward the bluff or onto my property. I would appreciate your consideration of this concern. Wesley C. Byrne Owner of 2817 Casco Point Road • • From:To: Margaret Martin Melanie Curtis Martin Comments Subject: Requested setback and hardcover variance 2815 Casco pt rd 2821 ��1 Casco Pt Rd Date: Tuesday,July 12,2022 7:28:34 AM Good morning, I am a nearby neighbor at 2821 Casco. I do hope to attend the meeting this coming Monday...but am voicing concern particularly on the request for variance for hard cover on the proposed remodel project. History has shown potential issues with water run off and significant damage to property that can occur. In The last few years... several lake properties have had lakeside landscaping structures fail....costly to the health of the lake and the owners. As well,my property and others are"downhill"from the proposed project at 2815... and likely recipients of excessive run off if hardcover variances continue to be granted. It appears the neighborhood will have many"projects"coming down the pike with turnover of properties...I hope the planning commission and home owners can be mindful of the land use rules that are in place in the lake communities. Margaret martin...2821 Casco Sent from my iPad • • ____ Norsted Comments �----=- --- =�= 2811 Casco Pt Rd '"-----''-' :;±1.':',..1::;t: -4;IVO. ..=-1,,,,,A.:-.,., ',r, ., v-..,-,....,-;'4,,,, '.,,,.. ,:-.I .l. W '.-,' '',' 4.‘.+ -.- , . 'S. , -.-1.;.-,..„ ,----:-%.""y...,..,,-,..-:-,..:74,,,,,..".‘„,,...6....4.:....„,.,,,,. :. .-,,,,,,,,_ .. ..; ,-.". ,- , 0, iiiiiik Y, k '''''. tr"'t i .i t r,$ .ii M: •i4'V 7 6.A 'C J •an `-,"ii ,---„ .--r-li :.fj L.,LI al Ill c;1:: -- s-.`;.-*:';:i'll'''..1 .'''". ''''''''-‘.;*--'''l *:7:::.,,-.''''':':' -'i4'-'-'r._ 4L'''') MI pi. li tl k$4Yc fr. _ ,5. M III _ ,, +� Z 1111 Martin additional comments 411 From: Margaret Martin To: Melanie Curtis Subject: Re:Requested setback and hardcover variance 2815 Casco pt rd Date: Friday,September 16,2022 8:15:55 AM Good morning Melanie, Happy Friday.. Know you wanted comments earlier,but I just spoke with a friend who is a civil engineer..geo-tech..and offered additional questions/concerns re 2815 proposal..thought it important to share"more professional verbiage"for my same concern. He questioned: how are the home owners addressing stormwater concerns associated with the increased footprint and reduced setback....as this directly affects all properties downslope. We also hear comments from Casco neighbors...living throughout the neighborhood questioning the change in the look of the neighborhood....Feeling high density...over building that is being allowed. Help us all understand why variances are now continually allowed? Hardcover and set back rules..guidelines....were put into place to protect the look and feel of the neighborhood as well as the health of the lake and neighbors properties. Seems current mantra is to approve these overbuilding requests. Appreciate you work in keeping everything organized!! Will attend on Monday M Sent from my iPad 1111 >On Jul 12,2022,at 7:28 AM,Margaret Martin<marg2821@yahoo.com>wrote: >Good morning, >I am a nearby neighbor at 2821 Casco. I do hope to attend the meeting this coming Monday...but am voicing concern particularly on the request for variance for hard cover on the proposed remodel project. History has shown potential issues with water run off and significant damage to property that can occur. In The last few years... several lake properties have had lakeside landscaping structures fail....costly to the health of the lake and the owners. >As well,my property and others are"downhill"from the proposed project at 2815...and likely recipients of excessive run off if hardcover variances continue to be granted. > >It appears the neighborhood will have many"projects"coming down the pike with turnover of properties...I hope the planning commission and home owners can be mindful of the land use rules that are in place in the lake communities. >Margaret martin...2821 Casco >Sent from my iPad From: pennvSaiki Saiki Comments • To: Melanie Curtis SubDate: 2815 Casco Potemt Road 2874 Casco Pt Rd Date: Sunday,September 4,2022 1:42:24 AM Hi,Melanie, I was able to see the plans for the redesign. These comments are submitted as a heads up to save drainage problems at this house as well as to the other houses, I noticed that the water management of the roof drainage needs detailing because of the existing boulder retaining wall indicating a drop to the land around 2817,the lower level entrance at this house,the drainage of 2813 towards 2815 and the slope of the land across the property as well as towards the lake. CONSIDERATIONS The side setbacks are narrow. The boulder retaining wall of 2815 is retaining the land of 2815 against a drop to the land along the entire side of 2817. The existing drainage of 2813 is straight away towards 2815, and the timbers are proposed to be removed. Now that the roof is a gable,the roof drainage is towards both sides of the house towards the neighboring properties. The roof overhangs are not dimensioned, but they look to be about 2 ft. There are no gutters indicated, but they would add another 4", so the setback overhead will extend over the foundation setbacks and be about 3.9-5.9 ft towards the property line at 2813, • and 8.2 ft towards the property line at 2817. The downspouts will probably be 6", so considerable water will be entering the land someplace along the foundation and then exiting extensions whether between the houses and to the street side on the 2813 side and to the back on the 2817 side to avoid loading the retaining wall protecting 2817. There is very little space on 2815 to manage downspout water with grading towards 2813, but grade needs to slope away from 2815 and yet meet the existing grade between the houses, Suggest locating the downspouts now in design, and do the contour and grading design to manage the water from the downspouts with consideration to the 2815 walkout level and the areas between the houses. Ordinance typically requires matching the existing contour lines at the property lines. Penny Saiki psaiki@icloud.com • PC Exhibit L 38 20-117-23 23 0007 38 20-117-23 24 0018 38 20-117-23 31 0058 MICHAEL G BASKFIELD DONNA L LILE D R WELTY&M M JIN • SHARON J BASKFIELD 2765 ETHEL AVE 3721 CASCO AVE 2755 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0009 38 20-117-23 24 0019 38 20-117-23 31 0066 CITY OF ORONO JUSTIN J HOLMERS DEAN V GREIMANN P O BOX 66 MICHELLE N HOFFMAN 3779 CASCO AVE CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 3800 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0010 38 20-117-23 31 0009 38 20-117-23 31 0067 CITY OF ORONO ALISA A MILLER DAVID B ADAMS P O BOX 66 3753 CASCO AVE 2868 CASCO POINT RD CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0011 38 20-117-23 31 0010 38 20-117-23 31 0071 CITY OF ORONO PAUL J FUHRMAN MARTI LYNN P O BOX 66 COLLEEN FUHRMAN STEVEN ROBERT GOUDY CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 3759 CASCO AVE 3750 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0012 38 20-117-23 31 0011 38 20-117-23 32 0006 ANDREW WATSON DEAN V GREIMANN RYAN LONGHENRY GABRIELLE WATSON 3779 CASCO AVE KRISTIN LONGHENRY 2776 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 2824 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 • 38 20-117-23 23 0016 38 20-117-23 31 0014 38 20-117-23 32 0007 JOY A GRUNDEEN CITY OF ORONO SPRAY ISLAND LLC 2797 CASCO PT RD P O BOX 66 2829 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0017 38 20-117-23 31 0015 38 20-117-23 32 0008 MICHAEL MCANALLY CITY OF ORONO DAVID J YORKS STEFANIE MCANALLY P O BOX 66 2825 CASCO POINT ROAD 2795 CASCO PT RD CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0018 38 20-117-23 31 0016 38 20-117-23 32 0009 REED L LARSON CITY OF ORONO MARGARET L MARTIN 2773 CASCO POINT RD P O BOX 66 2821 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0019 38 20-117-23 31 0056 38 20-117-23 32 0010 RICHARD A PUTNAM R E WOLFE WESLEY C&BRENDA BYRNE 2765 CASCO POINT RD 2871 CASCO POINT RD 2817 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 0 38 20-117-23 24 0017 38 20-117-23 31 0057 38 20-117-23 32 0011 KENNETH R SADDLER ROSEMARY IVERSEN LISA THOSTENSON SHERALYN K SADDLER 2835 CASCO POINT RD MARK THOSTENSON 2755 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 2815 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0012 CHARLES PRICE FAIRHILLS RD E M • INNETETONKA MN 55345 38 20-117-23 32 0013 THERESA A NORSTED 2811 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0014 JOHN M BAILEY PATRICIA L BAILEY 2807 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0015 CAROLE L FROMMELT ROGER H FROMMELT 2805 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0016 SHANE M WELTZIN ELIZABETH H HABERMAN 2800 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 • 38 20-117-23 32 0017 TAMMY L WOODIS MARC BRICKMAN 2818 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0018 COLBY G HAWLEY JENNA M HAWLEY 2794 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0019 GREGORY D/BETH S CZERWINSKI 2801 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0020 TODD J THEILMANN 2799 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 3S • BRIAN SWANSON SAMANTHA ERIN SIMON 3799 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 • ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS'ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I (We)-- � '1 %CE" of -2d2,-Z 4 f1'z> [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the tans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at C 'u ,t p also referred to as Land Use Application No. 7 I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. zly Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building &Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. An •A/'G►vr _ .. i PC Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Exhibit M Date: 6/22/2022 1111 Ltr`ir ,.,, 28 >?bS EE 2715 at';C.ri q„ 27-f.5 #'1 21,57 2755 zX' A 27tit '.`t 2705 't°f 10:- 2765 t. :.al t 275 Iai 2725 � •.,te . a %i' 45 i1�,Siit � 2$�" Jo Az iftlitilikr r' 2it 2759 Al „ 32301 1 2395 3759 i111 7 osi P.7.1 MIT IT t14i ll 2721 2811 ;tat r 2t‘11 2$£; 9l 1111 287* 2879 Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: I I I l I l t i I 2815 Casco Point Rd. This data () is furnished 'AS IS with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii)is fumished with no warranty of any pup and (ii) is n County e for It be eng for ny or injury nji ry • purposes.Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data For more information,contact Hennepin County GI S Off ice 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55437/gi s.i nfo@h en ne pi n.us • Date Application Received: 08/15/2022 Date Application Considered as Complete:08/25/2022 Ic7L0 % 60-Day Review Period Expires: 10/24/2022 VV To: Chair McCutcheon and Planning Commission Members y Adam Edwards, City Administrator G1 '/CESH&- From: Melanie Curtis, Planner WOG Date: 19 September 2022 Subject: #LA22-000043,John and Sanja deGarmo, 2675 Fox Street, Variance Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicants are requesting a front yard setback variance in order to construct an attached garage. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The subject property is on the corner of Fox Street and Gander Road. The property's narrower frontage is on Gander Road, making Gander Road by definition the "front"for setback purposes. • The majority of the property is encumbered by a large wetland, resulting in a relative small buildable area on the 4.4 acre property. The applicants are requesting variance from the required 50-foot front yard setback in order to construct a 648 square foot attached garage addition to the home. The existing 887 square foot detached garage will be removed.The garage addition is proposed to be set back approximately 35 feet from the front property line,where a 50-foot setback is required.The existing detached garage is located 22 feet from the front property line. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information:The applicant has identified the wetland encroachment, and the location of the existing improvements as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance.Additionally,they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds the practical difficulty criteria has been met.The 4.4 acre property contains approximately 3.5 acres of wetland.The majority of the remaining dry land exists within the RR-1B building setbacks.The septic system location on the south side of the home further limits building opportunities in a conforming location. • FILE#LA22-000043 19 Sept 2022 Page 2 of 4 • LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-420—Setbacks: RR-1B DISTRICT Required Existing Proposed Front (Gander) 50' Home 61.9' Garage Addition 35' Rear 50' +400' +400' North Side Street 30, ±175' ±186' (Fox) South Side 30' +160' +160' Wetland 25' or MCWD buffer House±50' Garage Addition±85' Section 78-420—Lot Area/Width: RR-1B DISTRICT Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200' Actual 194,571 s.f. (4.47 acres) ±415' Applicable Regulations: Front Yard Setback Variance (Section 78-420) The applicant is proposing to construction an addition to the home within the front yard setback.The required principal building setback is 50-feet;the existing home is situated 61 feet from the front lot line. A variance to permit a 35 foot setback for the addition is requested. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) 411 In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14,when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance.The proposed 35 foot setback for the home addition on the Gander Road frontage is in keeping with the character of the neighborhood as it functions as a side street. The property has a limited buildable area due to the large wetland.The requested variance is in harmony with the ordinance. FILE#LA22-000043 19 Sept 2022 Page 3 of 4 • 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan.The scale and type of variance proposed to construct an attached garage within the front setback does not impact adjacent properties,will be screened by vegetation,and is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls;The request to permit a garage addition within the required front setback appears to be reasonable as the property's reduced buildable area and orientation with respect to the wetland creates difficulties. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The home's location and orientation with respect to the wetland and Gander Road are not the result of the homeowner's actions. Further the septic system location eliminates the opportunity for a conforming building envelope;and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The home addition with a 35 foot setback from the Gander Road property line will be an improved setback from the existing detached garage and will be screened by existing vegetation.The project will not alter the character of the area. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct • sunlight for solar energy systems.Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06,subd. 17,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable, as residential building improvements are allowed in the RR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.The property's substandard buildable area, wetland impacts,septic system location,and existing conditions create difficulties which are particular to the property.The proposed setback is not out of character. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. While many of the adjacent properties are impacted by wetlands, the property's substandard buildable area,wetland impacts, septic system location, and existing conditions create difficulties which are particular to the property. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Staff finds that granting the requested variance preserves a substantial property right of the homeowners. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Staff finds this criterion is met. FILE#LA22-000043 19 Sept 2022 Page 4 of 4 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.The granting the requested variance will alleviate difficulties due to the property's substandard buildable area, wetland impacts,septic system location,and existing conditions. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments Public comments have been received and are attached as Exhibit G. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the setback variance as requested. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Site Photos (Applicant) Exhibit F. Aerial &Street View Photos (Staff) Exhibit G. Public Comment Exhibit H. Wetland NOD Exhibit I. Septic Compliance &As-Built Site Plan Exhibits. Property Owners List Exhibit K. Plat Map • PC Land Use Application Summary Exhibit A 1111 Application Date: 08/15/2022 Address: 2675 Fox ST Orono,MN 55391 Parcel Number: 0411723430003 Land Use Number: LA22-000043 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: John Degarmo & Sanja Degarmo Address: John and Sanja deGarmo Applicant: Name: Sanja deGarmo Company: Address: 2675 Fox St Orono, MN 55391 sanja.degarmo@gmail.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Mark Gronberg markg@gronbergassoc.com Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Attached Garage Addition to Residence Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application .�i Appeal of Admin Decision !.,a Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: L/4 --4-- • PC Exhibit B PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA 22-000043 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: N/A 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: To one side of the house, the wetlands boundary has been set by the MCWD. The house sits 61' from Gander St now. The house was built prior to Gander St being developed and would have adhered to the setback requirements at the time with Fox St being the Front. As the house sits on a corner, the shorter side is deemed the Front and therefore the setback applies to Gander St and not Fox. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The variance will be consistent with surrounding residential structures that have attached garages. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: Economic considerations are not a factor as building a new attached garage is significantly more expensive than updating the existing, non-conforming structure. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1163.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: The practical difficulties inherent in this project are the wetlands boundary to the west and Gander St to the east. The northern boundary of Fox St does not present a workable solution for an attached garage given the entrance to the house on the Gander St side. The proposed attached garage is part of a whole-house remodel to be submitted later this year that will bring the house up to code, address energy efficiencies and restore the woodlands and wetlands. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. • Response: The location and extent of wetlands requires any new structures to be built in a very restricted footprint and the 50' setback on the Gander St side is a hardship that precludes an attached garage of any size. Aita 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which lip said land is located. Response: N/A 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: The granting of the variance will eliminate an unsightly, potentially hazardous and bulky outbuilding and pull together the aesthetic and massing of the primary residential structure. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: The granting of the variance does not impair the health, safety, etc. of this chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: The granting of the variance will ensure that the applicants/owners can age in place without the hazards of traversing multiple grade changes in bad weather. S • • PC Exhibit D ....__ . 3-..16y N+aara JwrwAw s.V..Y( m-AV) RE4,14415.Rai. A.m PnRA10" ftw.r.,.v TRN**.u1T1.K.��`meµ `` .-.-L... i -......� ;� 1 it I�'✓J }'AI.L- ... hlvuJb W 4 -- --...._... _.... _...._ —.,' �-' r , { Amor,PA Ise 5tnrµr,crJ ) 1 ( I T g1UNG ntW __- 1 91V rNG-fa JMRa.a"wow, TT ID) µK +N> 'iR-rM W9 (1411n ti El-E.-VAfl O deGar ro,zehiide.rKz y..`1_i'• 2449 f x.4 7,eRo1Ja,NW G4e91 ?413n doGnm.i.61i'M ..,'NAt ho: 176'R' • • P �___.r --- rtePMr+e tiro/•»TH1-NON vnwldot•/ i /ice J/ wsw 61,cycs4rr Inl MT* 0 , 1 ---------......_ 1,---i _ M. I TAU. MEN RN4ovr. 9,01C OFIP P$. A/f v.- yhT K101.1 C,AK hTlDT Its .4. _1/o„ ( ivillc.4 7)40,1 +#MtWe *Iv be.fcvnh.d) • • I I I I I I I I I I u,:w Ge.Rase- I I I I I I (I (3:1 I �' I I NeW "°"" I w..a��c a bWKI I tAgncri NEW x+cae'.hv I ponr-H r N6p/ b NA • AKDLK °I Errrlgl I — �I- rt. Q view- I H—�/ <, p wild-..W H I r 5wK _• p»p�N,e / t _ wi I I I RYr G R.? wru+ciJ ,• , I BMnI IbeDRocv 2 il Ir �°-t0 .0 w„M�a�) wI pa )r ---- ........„4:11,.... I 'Gw i 1'a t 1,.,,.,y , ___ wa. y - - __ __—J — „ IIGir(ace ko o F.ua 1wE cddu..�ib.y 4 1k-4.v vI 5hdves LaNb2'a.piu�•Pr or8i*7 D4.1. Y ,, 2xe�le J...k.1,.,,wk. ti.EPI-'M1 PA LIVING ROOM blNI l& C/ dew Yiuh,re.WAgo ._ {opiaco — 8e4w Exi.4ini I • I I I I I I I I kW Cd.gAr I I rn I NtlW Hugconq I T t ' j wow rui. rr.tl�-►ANTeYj N&W H• io4w rov wn vw�^ NayJ 8..I1R►10.14.. yi+ • Eang Imo_= -= 11_ - Pi +;F 1 `� F I a swk row/ryII.L aw tor of r-i-rtost4 f I r ,.b (s ,,y =) becamoM y I/- I .aru I O �� t I/ I ILeii -` '/ o.l ) F `�- _I 1 f Y t may y NJiri 1i*Vs,' se.1 ji ...t, .J.,, ��� r �r R-r �.� 4..., --7-1 - Iw .--; Luarwrua ry.nf..� a'EDKa�Mi I an tttv+ir+' l ry LNIWG RAM bININb • 0 6h>AYE% -11M7 y_ ,-,wcvll i /NeAI 1,4r4 ID4l op EI 1V Y./•l 7AHtL vi jsganrtby ,. — (�v) I- -1 e , - .51 $oAtnWALY e0).4._ 011.4.1 to' NarF3 — — _ I.P Ma PATH y 7-wu-EbKe Whitby{7 I El 1.A LL mu./Iur04PP_v MIFF !` 1 3.1:44:117:14:WC7:1.1:4 ExfEruoRr>`I . LII .1I � 4. . JN 4EpAr_cur II lam- Yo 1� � •Ir — t w oc � 5.ALA- W ri oowrJ&oVE� _—`I L 4 'Pr., WtacM9caAb-R I --I I I t1vIJ W4LL KSMoN/e P#6£BD IV I I I WV-1 I#R r I Il II I ----_^ I11SrALL GABLE iLUL I I II /GRyviol-. 21 la 1 it 1 fr_....__ri a BIn LT-,r19' I Xd RsrR11,18 V-44.1.1,n I(-EY•1HTNb LINE op v'- . KEM )1 OVJIJBIZS PS 17v.0aM m-MY -2EMoVE.ovaacv1lD - F41,1,4- 6a, M.JP Rep6LE r r Pr �___-(2eMOVC BVILT-IrJS d.R6FRd.Mg 1,4`,1..1.4-'�t(Intr- -lea- RrF eLe W�Wy 1 r<IM hUverC • 0 Reyld6e..w v�N6 WrTw TYAiy �ROIE si aRrK4N'Fen.V'CMITLAPJ 1 41( O. law",/nivicr,A,r Rpr� sx� Illi , eroT6Y1ma�iniip ( 1 I E - I- 1111•11111M ET! r 1 - 9,>r.lG,a - , , l -._—1bRara wwyi ,o,Nf� Nerl at.NcawALk Kepi d w�Nvows 1 �'�9Y) L75D) .�Nv TRiN 1'R71-) EI-EVATIOt-1 _�,,,, deGar..,o 2ehfd..rwe. ZL79 YO),;or+orin,Mu cg711 V4. 7anfn JeGorn,.J.,('n9 Shetitno: P4 r.: 0 • KEPlovt exifi'�wrw -_a FRbME 9 KfGiivE¢GA(' 4-- 'F�,rk{�Ip _. __ ... / ,4tW �iKYLI(,VT DJ ear++ ill — _,__ — N1TtE_Ew77'6 '� I '-AND—L4Iy_ahM6 i — ryw wINy�✓ I '' L 4-- bklIA L ApbMvrl 0.EM0VG MVP- 6M, WiW1,4b' aieudb Te M4YO14 1+oV,6 0-6, T EL VAliie+l (*WA. "4 6RAv6) • 44 vb., itilWr IttP stFRame s t.»ra.w NEW adrt _Fy,T fir.t..111141 f1Yr)cy JC i ggiv.- KJ.,"iG Eu1 m 0 i \ _atMcte Exrmr>i REMWE EKv/rG yn,v---vac..8 au�wriY� 5t N6_Tn *we& 3 Co rfitlxTi�FB $bJINDpv!'RC Me F'!R N.04 t� 4/T UJ P S.,1J5T NSW sLtD6K.. 4 GI4eJ6 F(<lT�.4Ll.� SO VTF sLEXATIOTI YAr,1,b. • Aw I 4.-t ovER _—...___. 176.0.K.016 _____ -- hNp TR11h 8%KT7 ni 6 � - — � o IF poo5. Rc 7 s wDYN NO-TRIM K,;,PI,.,�x, ld " 01 EVhTlo1.� Ref-PA-mt. 4 Iµ6yJ.L i _ -r-i - rh*lEL GL It ry -l o` IP ary F I Ii--M1iMore.5i<{My.tiRpYr • _ L N6W (IUf✓R6 Y/INpONI .r-1 D—/oNC.V.a mrer iNG ` uNw iP s ter rw I lli IrI —— I r -ter =11 1=-] 111 — w�R_ .dMWW ms6 V Em � ' L �� U �L _ rL ML • __2 - -- _, ruTwl ( _�P M1rYce >- — _L4+rP '-� PR."�- • cII -+ . —Neil vs* J--f er.F ►r 11,-,A1.l1Vi;[fjr. 'iElr1.1.1 —"�✓^w+M-'Rn^o T.wv 4.-I'O` iry� ^F'>ti .! .K f6KI IKE • '..4".,,,,,,,Ic:—"4'...;),-',.'`'.•.'1-;...-1.".4'.,1•,4U.I.'S9,O1..01i-4*,E.4,..*.3-.),.4-401-.i4,-....814,17-l•V.0.,i`g:-,,,.4..,.,.1.,;..,---;1.7':..":..6'•-,:4'..._-.,._-,)f:,..—...-1-..1--1k10----%,,Y4..1l,'0 1u.,r,x,•,.,-,-.• f- -- ___ - _ _- __._— __ - _.._ - --- - SHEET INDEX I SITE PLAN 1, -, ar` , 2 EXISTING LOWER LEVEL 3 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL`w.,f,P cw �:.n 'k -` —` 4 4EXISTING ELEVATIONS : . "I S EXISTING EXTERIOR VIEWS fi YR kb t,.p,."at } ,t,'r ,I x"'f yy l .pi..._ i. 1'a # C� f '.4 4- --:,•'• lim&41rillr"-: 'F.' ' . �� � tre .....III �,��_ _ -----:...... — r .r:. - - ,7 { • IY� F "7 _ t. A % i_ __ c i. t Lilt r'i',i h' n„ ,.'�y ' " - ,`�. / 0. .';‘ II 111 C 4tyr.c' j s s ay l , 304, / s w r>; �'dr r Si' 110-,..*-!----7 7:11°1: il ' ''''' 1 J I F -+' 7 r " � t F-d ¢# .; is I c`i s " ! 5 �r _� t SHEET SIZE:1 al1,.� � De Gara,o Residence ;01tii_lyea �{ 2675 FOX:I. ORONO.MNQuigleArchitectsW.adux n.,e® SITE PLAN "GIS" �. DEC,20'L1 Dmmpl Drawirga SCALE:I/64"= I'-0" SHEET NO: L • I 4110 SHEET INDEX 1 SITE PLAN - - 2 EXISTING LOWER LEVEL 3 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL 4 EXISTING ELEVATIONS - 5 EXISTING EXTERIOR VIEWS LAUNDRY TILE I I I I I MECY1 9 IL 7-7 I/4" 4 1/2"LL I0-2 1/2" 4 I/2'4L 7-5 1/4" 4 I/2"4L 3'-I" O \ �I �1�1 �I�I �11 ..„, CLGN 8'-2' ,. 11 .,,,______ CPTTILE Ailv ISI Q ELEC. PANEL SOFFIT I I 0 SOFFIT G'-10• _ 'II o F I BEDROOM I I REC ROOM CLGN 8'-I 3/8• CLGN 8'-0 3/4• CPT CPT 14 J al SHEET SIZE:11 rt 17 De Garmo Residence Fp°i �- II lII III)tfl11 ur,FOX SL ORONO MN �iI ® EXISITNG LOWER LEVEL PLAN SLIDER Quigl�ey 612-024830 ArchitectsSI 'SS� woman a. H0woe .I@ SCALE:I/4" = 1'-0" PROJECT NORTH DEC,2021 Concept Drawings SHEET NO: 2 I .1 III III I IIIIIII4IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ll IIIIIIIIIII!IIIIII SHEET INDEX S_ _ 3 E PLAN 2 EXISTING LOWER LEVEL 3 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL 4 EXISTING ELEVATIONS I —1— 5 EXISTING EXTERIOR VIEWS - tv1UDROON1 UP TILE ®�_ .Ecr} finn, nm' . . O J II 1..1 t P =DOVVN— j nhVOOD - :EDROOM, 'I �g' CPI I ' _DP' — �I J �ATt C� �� rII r , 1_,„11111 0 ,g g„\1111111 TILE F —1F 1 II ii 1 CPT 1I II i "II M _ h 1 r�— LI 'DEC IESEDROOM �IVING ROO4 CPT �f FVWOOD U SHEET SIZE:11 c 17 De Garmo Residence ro: 2675 FOX ST,ORONO,MN P¢ I i I Quigley Architects ioe� ® EXISTING MAIN LEVEL PLAN O Quite"' °teas 1 PROJECT NORTH DEC,2021 Concept Drawings SCALE:1/4° = I'-O° SHEET NO: 3 I 0 SHEET INDEX 1 SITE PLAN 2 EXISTING LOWER LEVEL 3 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL 4 EXISTING ELEVATIONS 5 EXISTING EXTERIOR VIEWS L-- I 1111111.11, IIIIII 1 7 liiiipililli :- I a-- , , _ 1' '= ,..,____ O NORTH ELEVATION 4 ___=_1 _________,____________, - SCALE:I/8" = I'-O" X _ _ .I 4 SOUTH ELEVATION R T 110111111r1 SCALE:I/8' = I'-O" Elt II 1 ' ,tsk,i , i M. 1@------- -- .' . -----T 11. 4 SCALE:I/O" = II IIII I I II IMI,I I III III II 1 MI 1=1 111111i'1' I I I111. --- 11101 N ■■ SHEET SIZE:11 x 1T UDe Garmo Residence Et u I 1 11 2675 FOX 51;ORONgAW `11 Quigley Architects t°� 4511 WEST ELEVATION �•�m, 24. $t° ,S, DEC.ZJ21 Conmpt/Dnvinpa SCALE:I/O" = I'-O" SHEEDDO: • I SHEET INDEX 1 SITE PLAN 2 EXISTING LOWER LEVEL 3 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL 4 EXISTING ELEVATIONS 5 EXISTING EXTERIOR VIEWS 1 PIPW- I ' 'l 11• 111 I I till" III 0 I 1 _ .. 111-1M 1 NZ- MININIINIl s- 1 .0.......... Jib I , :,....,„ . ' _ Ill 1 .. .--i--:-0,t• , _. ---i...-•-• ...._ ,. CDI NORTH CI SOUTH ill • ..._, II mint 0 WEST 0 EAST SHEET SIZE 11 7 17 De Garmo Residence ril 2675 FOX ST,ORONIO,MN 0 I a 1 ,5 I Quigley Architects o gi DEC.2021 Concept OravAngs SHEET NO 5 le ,.1 • �' - •T S y ,, ti aSA , .,�, s�^ �`rc. ill.:".‘I';:'''.7:-.. p c �4k 3 , r :'V4,,,,,::t:::;,. ..Nt: 4 ,� r.' '�4 3 ,�� ' Exhibit E .,::: . .,?:,„r 1:1.4._____---' ',..,..,,:, r 'i!- 4. � � +',' t as,I, ,- q �-a. . _ ♦ -e. i\-;,k-7' -...'''*4':i.,, - . • -.-:-:!..;:,-4 tt - t � f ' ;1p ® 3 i` _ y f I! . . hk N' p 1,.,I':44,.1.„. ',-- z ',41t'.:.,Ir,41.4i.,'.:7a.:`4ipt,,l i,.t ie,,i''',',,,.:.'..p.l,,o-. g /14 ;' i f ! 3 ` may 4 ! R r.,. • �— 6�ea k fr x z }!,y rw, 4'''*414_-1 1-11,1 11 'a � ' _ .aa �" —*c� .,t„rc`•s. - a t�. `` mac -� ys�' ,« " iCT :, ,_ ,,,:r .wt' ' em„- �.y - w,-1� ct' .r?" t7.10. £„,, • ,, fY '.' ifik r SEF� �" d „1 ...� N=��g�f *��� � � °�� . ����b "dam '� � � � - t, Location of proposed � ,`V. �° , garage addition ', ,-E` ,,{ .k" $ „ * r � r+ �'1=h• ,c if `6 °✓ i- .i�t�'C a.fi w 7 ' • 0 : P � 6ti'' Asa u,, of "'' t z ., xJ+ �. I r,.� r Y '0; 6 r s bya � 1 L � F {�, Sri -:-nfi s R . - ! y , 1 �a +i b. .y�� Y ^ G(J r t�ti ` - [ y� t fit',, . r;F k _ r 7 nth'�10 37 t I .r� ,Lr w + NN I P err } j i' 10�{> 1i �t1r F 111. c i(r �Y' ;,... .G. * f .r .,a111.1 y fit w 1 e } ry t x 444 . • P` iaq yyFi �.f,¢ ""'k'.cVp.t i,2:,y —�+._. . 4•'t �'c� y 't 7 , \ 7 , i` " View of existing detached �', garage from House • • 015** Ailismrptiwyg itt,„1‘.14q- ''..i" ---.. • • - , :,..- ve .. 4. !,;• ',. • 7e, \ b. ? i...,..).,...„ .,..7..,..• tz4.,21,1, lc. .. , ..... ---._:: moti...4 -ii.'' r / 1 . . - , 4 ,..:.,..- ..... __ . . , ..„.... e.,...„..,„ , ..-,•;:,_-,.. ,,:---.,...„_,, . ' , • _,..,,,,‘1 r:.1„,'-':'_' '7. . '',.'„::::,-----..r. ,' . .. : •,,..4.. .:,,,,,.: ,.„,...,7.,..-.7,.... ,..,..--'......,--......,,,;.,_,.' ... .. ll.47' ;,..,....„......_,,,, ,..„_._ . ... . . ., ., . ,... ,..:,. . .. . ,, , l‘. - - • A, .. .. ,..,, ..,... ,p.- .... - , --.14. .;...- . ,•.,.i 2e .::4340.4.':„..-7:',=',7,, , , , .•,,,, , • ••, •:,41,4A-,-:-.;.• :.•,..-4,' .,. - ir ' • , -4114ipr='" -.1 .. - : • ,. . . lik.•-•-s-e-',. 1.• • • - •.t• - • , • till . . . ., -- - . ..,. .._. .„,,,,,... ..... , , . , . Mer. ,I ,,.. _. • 11,,r'!, Et, MOM MMENNIIMMIll iiiiniPi 'al=IliMMIMINallail...1.'''-iiii II:MU • . (P ir if 'ili •• Wall WWI J.. . ,., ... . .._-_,............,...-,...-,..,. ..-,...........r.re. 1 comas oessaillIM 1111111MIMmi 111•111111=1111 SOPA ... . . ,.,• - -. - _ ....„ . . • • ' —-.- .: •-.- - - ' :- ' '-- - -- Gander Street - .. . • , . ,i , s .' -"'• - - - - • -• - - elevation view- • • . .. „ .. •- • _. - . • ....-- ,., ,." , _ - . - - - :-- , ' -- -- • - - ' : ' . ' ..' ' Existing Home . _ .. ., • • , _.. . . , - . -... - , .- - - _ -. . ' , - = - - - - - . .. . - ..., •. .- . '. , ' . , .. .., , . . - . . . , 11111/ • + Tk '/'--j.vt+•A • , ,.rA Mw .'' . ;• •', ek.'. r r•y 1' ' '. rw`' y ;4S ems �+ f 4 `fr/ r` 1 •' .j', ,�. ..;. _,,,...„,, . .. , . .... • . . . ..... _ , , ,,. ,,--' . . .. , -.-. .y: • ••, ..:.•,...„. .... . _.... , ,„,, .,..„.,,, ., ..• .p,„,„Itr,.... ."_ . ., . . , _ 4 .,.,:_ -.1"-... :-. . ,,, .,-'-'' k'';,?; ''.,'•'. ' t +fit. ,$„ ,., , . , : - f/ ., ., ,,,. ..._ ,,,,,,„„ks ,„ 4 yr. y,'} ., 4. >.,..'. - .> c der i ..' t • ' 4I it a 3 t i � yyr.4. ., . t � - n .�- ��'+ a ..+ a .,fir ...*„p f �r r �'- _ ,; "" r f$q, .F + -A y r �x .' y",sue �e•' r}� .F'4.e i xP%' { 7"+" ,..+ �cFa"' "'"/ S"-` �' s'}'�.�'�� : ��.�. i a-�•n- .t., -,„, .za p � � "' ✓.c W3 �" �{'+�{ i... i�:�' ,...s.ms�a'�y�, .,,+ ' " r `+ � �z - View of existing detaed �,- 7 *�� „a °+ ._. ' xn r� , x garage and shed from Gander " , �� r a;; .Street ` ai 1, a 1 'err" 1, _.9tc.a .., .s' '�:>`+• a,.. ..ter ... ,-. -- ,:. " `t . - - 1 _ - .:f, ... 40 • PC : "' F X : 4 '} � . k ' 'k ' - •2;°* Exhibit F St R c- ,4', / ' "I �M ° �3.- iiiiiiip e' E. Vii .�i 2». ' r Garage Addition : ,�, '.t Ai, , ' #y� Location n K v 1:.. ...,,,i, .: :::!'::::Ai,::,z,:**::?:1!:\t*:::„;Y 7>s i `:1;.....: ' ,4,:,, :'''#a t::iv, r., 4'...,.;% i ..,,,.,,,.iA4,.:: Imo C. ', ' .- ..- - s''',;-:*:----'k,...:„. ..-- .I!*. -/C. ., 4 4 i: 4 , . , _ , . "� w ti f , ,, ,R i_ Aid ff is + rK `l s . Aerial view s. , II 411` II 0 3 �. ►two ''' ,r"fr s:1 ...'' .•11 0"« ! •° ")• O. : . r '•k. , . II �, ` ,..S ,•A k, S „a" *, t 4 -., .Ea �1f,�y t .- , �' i '/A art 1 .10.''9h.t iW -f 4 4:� s 77 i +f�„ R'K z9 '!'x 4`r ~ h;k�r t, t ss�g� .0 Y4 y.` Tit, ! FI i -*:":':V.''•: '-V.."''--.-.'4.:!-.;..".::-..''',4.. -1' . '..--'. r----:".. -,'4.:'-4,44-..-'„4 ....,4(4 ..., , .«a.. t . wit. ;£ t _ . t!%, O r: f ,: +.. `.y4- - . (1 ' z Ad Y . , , :.- a. - e ' �s4 . + . ', /, p ' 4l ba . , " t [" ^ 0. ...41,.....'''Aiii.'-...,,':,. ..- v-',-,;7::.:;',:''.:::,',.:- sty, >_ b y 1. ,,. 'yg�+ fit. m Y rrn s n Y 3� �A~Facing West ❑ Panorama C Tue May 3 2022 0 1 , ... '!' i • �c x , ' '- {s t ill ' 1 fli 1 '., Z ; Itil �a sit., �.t `�ypij Aik>, .1+ t 1./ ;iv _ f fo . . - i �` It • te a tt r r rT h .'r,. "t5, ( "" 11: ,, }� �lyrr.ice �,� �`• ,� Facing West from Gander Road - Existing Condition • ,Y,,0,11) , +, Y .. • Fes` —_ .. tieg h 1 g, "� Ws.,4 .A v L t. 9� S 4 -'.�'ii„x ..wws i t ' ' . s .,d :', ',V. -_ . 2 Y. t ,f,} It, 4,,,,• , ,,,g. „..,..,...,... • Facing South from Fox Street- Gander Road • i , . ',„\,..., ,,. = t 4 „.., „ , , .. ,,,,. „ ,,,,,,„,,,..,,,,,0),„ 4„1.41,...,,,...1 :,. ...... .. .... 7.,,,, . , „,,,,, , ,, ,, . ,... . . , _... . _. .:„„ ., ,,,, . .. .... ,,,..„...,. Tr.„ p...110t -.: __ ,.,,,,,09, .wo. '''.. ,...' *Ai , .... , '; P' ' • :+ a ' 'i fit • • • e uc vv • Facing South down driveway (view from Fox St) ID PC Exhibit G Re: Proposed Garage Addition From: Meredith Weir I meredith.gallick@gmail.com Wednesday, Aug 24, 5:51 PM To: Sanja deGarmo I sanja.degarmo@gmail.com Cc: Ferg I Fergus.weir@gmail.com, John deGarmo I jdegarmo58@gmail.com Looks lovely Sanja! Happy to support. From: M Sanja deGarmo I sanja.degarmo@gmail.com Wednesday, Aug 24, 4:50 PM Hi Fergus and Meredith, As you know, we are planning on remodeling our house and would like to build an attached garage and tear down the existing one. Because Gander is considered our Front/Lot, the setback requirement is 50'and we need a variance to build it since it would sit between 35' - 38'off of Gander, or 12'- 15'over the setback requirement. Attached are the site plan and drawings for the proposed garage addition so you can get an idea of what we would like to do. As you can see from the elevations, all of the siding and windows will be new. I have also attached an idea for landscaping that shows the new driveway and plantings along Gander. The application will be reviewed first at the Planning Council meeting on September 19th then at the City Counci meeting on October 10th. You should receive a notice from the city between now and September 19th about the application for a variance. I hope you feel, as we do, that a new attached garage would be a huge improvement over the existing one. Any good word from our neighbors is sure to help us get the variance approved. I am happy to answer any questions you have. Please don't hesitate to call, text or email me. Thank you and we are so happy to be your new neighbors, Sanja S PC nriBOARD OF WATER Exhibit H AND SOIL RESOURCES Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District County: Hennepin Applicant Name:John and Sanja de Garmo Applicant Representative:Will Effertz, Kjolhaug Environmental Services Project Name: 2675 Fox Street, Orono LGU Project No. (if any): W22-020 Date Complete Application Received by LGU: 6/8/2022 Date of LGU Decision: 6/7/2022 Date this Notice was Sent: 8/9/2022 WCA Decision Type-check all that apply ® Wetland Boundary/Type ❑ Sequencing ❑ Replacement Plan ❑ Bank Plan (not credit purchase) ❑ No-Loss (8420.0415) ❑ Exemption (8420.0420) Part: ❑ A ❑ B ❑ C❑ D ❑ E ❑ F ❑ G OH Subpart: ❑ 2 ❑ 3 ❑4 ❑ 5 ❑ 6 ❑ 7 1=181719 Replacement Plan Impacts (replacement plan decisions only) Total WCA Wetland Impact Area: Wetland Replacement Type: ❑ Project Specific Credits: ❑ Bank Credits: Bank Account Number(s): Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendations(attach if any) ❑X Approve ❑ Approve w/Conditions ❑ Deny ❑ No TEP Recommendation LGU Decision El Approved with Conditions (specify below)" ® Approved' ❑ Denied List Conditions: Decision-Maker for this Application: © Staff ❑ Governing Board/Council ❑ Other: Decision is valid for: © 5 years (default) ❑ Other(specify): ' Wetland Replacement Plan approval is not valid until 8 WSR confirms the withdrawal of any required wetland bank credits.For project- specific replacement a financial assurance per MN Rule 8420.0522,Subp.9 and evidence that all required forms have been recorded on the title of the property on which the replacement wetland is located must be provided to the LGU for the approval to be valid. LGU Findings—Attach document(s) and/or insert narrative providing the basis for the LGU decision'. ❑Attachment(s) (specify): ❑ Summary: John and Sanja de Garmo have applied for wetland type and boundary confirmation for the wetlands located at 2675 Fox Street, Orono. A wetland delineation was conducted by Will Effertz on April 12, 2022.The delineation shows 1 wetland within the project area. Wetland 1 was identified as a Type 2/3, PEMB/PEM1C wetland. BWSR NOD Form—November 12, 2019 1 MCWD, BWSR, and Will Effertz (Kjolhaug) reviewed the boundaries in the field on July 18, 2022. MCWD and BWSR agreed that the wetland boundary needed to be adjusted to better follow the excavated ditch and exclude the bermed area (see attached figure). Additionally, one independent flag moved closer to the home • on site. MCWD approves the wetland boundaries and types as shown in the delineation report.This decision is valid for five years.A future project located on this property may require a permit from the MCWD. I Findings must consider any TEP recommendations. Attached Project Documents ❑X Site Location Map E Project Plan(s)/Descriptions/Reports (specify): Appeals of LGU Decisions If you wish to appeal this decision,you must provide a written request within 30 calendar days of the date you received the notice.All appeals must be submitted to the Board of Water and Soil Resources Executive Director along with a check payable to BWSR for$500 unless the LGU has adopted a local appeal process as identified below.The check must be sent by mail and the written request to appeal can be submitted by mail or e-mail. The appeal should include a copy of this notice, name and contact information of appellant(s) and their representatives (if applicable), a statement clarifying the intent to appeal and supporting information as to why the decision is in error.Send to: Appeals& Regulatory Compliance Coordinator Minnesota Board of Water&Soils Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 travis.germundson@state.mn.us Does the LGU have a local appeal process applicable to this decision? ❑ Yes' El No llf yes, all appeals must first be considered via the local appeals process. Local Appeals Submittal Requirements(LGU must describe how to appeal,submittal requirements,fees,etc.as applicable) Notice Distribution (include name) Required on all notices: • SWCD TEP Member: Stacey Lijewski-stacey.lijewski@co.hennepin.mn.us ❑x BWSR TEP Member: Jed Chesnut-jed.chesnut@state.mn.us ❑ LGU TEP Member(if different than LGU contact): ® DNR Representative: Wes Saunders-Pearce-wes.saunders-pearce@state.mn.us ❑Watershed District or Watershed Mgmt.Org.: ® Applicant:sanja.degarmo@gmail.com ▪ Agent/Consultant:will@kjolhaugenv.com Optional or As Applicable: ® Corps of Engineers: usace_requests_mn@usace.army.mil ❑ BWSR Wetland Mitigation Coordinator(required for bank plan applications only): ❑ Members of the Public(notice only): ❑ Other: BWSR NOD Form—November 12, 2019 2 Signature: Date: 8/9/2022 • This notice and accompanying application materials may be sent electronically or by mail.The LGU may opt to send a summary of the application to members of the public upon request per 8420.0255,Subp.3. • • BWSR NOD Form—November 12, 2019 3 ice. RV . ) 64 ............. ''\ } '.a. �� r CD CV 950 `'^", ~' r`4" E. _mom Erosional Feature (El) -- _ . /,,, 10 linear feet on-site ��` , (C-5 s /7(7 ---- __----- _.------ ___ co SP 1-1.Up _ • /,- SP 1-1Wet ,w; ll(,,,,,,,t\ 96,,c, i'r fir i' 4` , *• "' , in N... WO � '. • :` , -. '.t*,twi'ir 4"..5,M i'ce.A;;0") .:' k:v :l4wf,',4:,..,,/,.!:4.,,,' 'z'„- ,,,„, , ‘ ,c) 0-;, ,.„) 4 01'4y.r�'J" 3' 4 "�!^ 'G 51 yOttf: L Ilea'.y'�� i£ zi l p la . ♦xS % r !•-� .,."f:Y ,',, _ i 4i J4#� F ,S}41)} ** Yl } t' 4, "y;t - '�. r, #� ,'� ' `` Wetlandr//1 ; x ,44 f4 . .',, 4, 4 A �.�.,,,, , ,„..1„ , ,, # 1.3.25 Acres ,.t,for, .1 .ii., e'r t C it` i r„ k 4.d £ t j 40 r K'„`�`"^f,,,.' ra: f � ,.* f ff-F' Oft�e F.�,�+,,E=4 ` .SP1-2Wet <+_,? i1 4 ,4.' . r 4 '. , r , * -2Up (..:,„ ,fib $ s. {* *'} . " t ip t e'#r+e"i f ems:t jt i 4 r 1.,.. ,/, r., ! �' a ai. e , (0 w Note: The TEP has determined ., v16�'i # , X i . � a � ;et fi 10,1C ) this area to be an .., s f 94 M. A �4yl A_f ft;/ , w,, ,, excavated /disturbed area. S • Sample Points ,'s Transect414., '- :00 Erosional Feature { I. ,_ y a,.>,y' h 7:7 iii\, f I Site Boundary r`,c�fe." f i 0, 0` AREA A: Original wetland boundary was determined to have Wetland Boundary !{;,-MA insufficent hydrology (effectively drained/ bermed) and was moved A.Hennepin County Lidar !1'�'..* in closer towards the excavated ditch Figure 2 - Existing Conditions TEP Revisions (7/18/22) N 0 100 2675 Fox Street Site (ICES 2021-269) III A Orono,Minnesota .0 . Feet '._.. Note:Boundaries indicated A 1 on this figure are approximate KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an 1.-- ....ov official survey product. �v Source:MNGEO Spatial Commons PC CV_ vl Exhibit • CITY OF t E • (7 - o WORKSHEET FOR SEWAGE DISPOSAL WORK N CD rI �' `` Date / A i i '� - Inspector Lu 1 ( (�e (Di LI b 5 Building Permit No. Owner ( .,(1 r( S 13 1 u wvk_•i? v'- Fee Property Address ' - F 7� �in�bTy �� � � Jc'— �? Building j Plumbing Contractor-Outside Sewage Disposal iq 44p, ` sc,,,,,--. Septic Tanks l�, Material C C. Cre j�+ �- (h1 ) Capacities :�~ ( �'+--- % Proper Outlet & Inlet? L.------- Baffle Plates? 11' Drain Field: Total length of lines Number of lines Type of soil -, (i..... .(s Percolation Test <7/ P ��S 4: // 1 Width of trench Type of filter material lc--)F%i.; PT.,OY _ zT, .i� . Amount of filter material below line ' ' 7l t Z t r—eel-- ' 4 Na `P Depth from top of tile to finished grade Lj /17y Check Vents L..---- Check Caulking :,.-- • Check Grade in Horizontal Waste Pipes '' Clean Outs '---- Tonage or Yards of Filter Material Z-5O_4Ry4Q5 Total Sq. Footage of Drain Field 17/(0 Sand CZ) Rock j u X 47 Overall Size of Mound System dam. 7/�— Y A lel Size of Mound System Rock Filter Material Draw detailed diagram to scale with measurements below. ,4. , ` 3.7 1�! r-I 2 = Li $ ' W -f Es 3 .--- 43-S-' ( IA i L .s" /13 ' wLiL 3 �0 }, 3 — y 3 e_IZ cet _^ i' (De ffcQ euvoe f,„ rar,. i,--_ \... , , Iso __, „Li , i V- t v\ C, .- --,-,4 v„trt... ,..„),1 4 r4i•. G ? , • `1 J ...•... • .. ..•-.. ; . .. . - . • .... .. •. • . .... .. . . ' ',...., - •,. ,• .. ... . ..... . ..• .• • • ' • . . .. :••• . . . . . .. . . . . . .. ... .. . . . .. . .. . .... .• '.. " I. • .. • • ...' .. ... . r• . , .. •' .. .•... .... .ntit.-4111.•Ntt OT.4.4).011:11tION :-CtYrtftiliaticei inspection report , -.. ,,, . ..-. ..to.N.t.RoLAGEN;r. ......... .. . .....,. : . ..„.. . . ., . , . ,. ,. :_. • ....• • form. t20 Lafayette Roici':Natifi .. -. .-. ..-E40"019.':1;0641140060:.s*,*011-.TirOatni,11 ;!-:Stern••00001%.11- 10-: •. • .-.-.*::Paoli Mil i $15S-41.4 4. • • - •• • . .-•. • s - -: i .•: -.:-. -... :-.._:...,::•:, -.....,•,.-_,-,..... :•;-. . - • - " •-' • • • . •: —.-: ."- . :::..-. . .: .;..-- . :•-••... Prx:Type;•g0071314000anctriVOrveinent • • • • - • • • - •-•• - • • - • -• . i nittittetitingOele*ttir must-lit*tlilt iarofciii,i0:.f..41,iii:tiiii..iiiitiii:b4iiiiiiii.'.4iiitilit,I164-04:tiiApti'Sigtiiiti3O*01it Wfthtli:::4411".of: • final distettiiiiation of canipliancii'ettlioficotpiiiii!*littituatiaitsfOrfiljii*i(44blirfoitti are located on the,tsitOrielotti04000-4.n -.. Control Agency(MP0A)webtOte.:at pt-tp.ic,/**.041:sttite,Mtliks-#3)te'sAipilltifii001.ti*iiii0iti.iiiit. . ..-,: .-. . - - .• ,• . ....• '..-..- . : ... Property information .. ;: -...... .. - ,..:::, : - .....,....,..:-.......... ...:.- .... ..' 2.Local;ii.tiaktitinilitiitieri--:-.. : ...... ..........s. ' : -:. '.:: ... .' : Parcel IDIf ot• er,.(NieiRange:-;.:3$118g3440.039 • '• ..: .• •:" •... "Relii06taiteeriai#ieit ..-..rtinNieiyttaiiiiiit -. : 7- :: .::::::•-..: ._ ., .. .. . . . . ... ... Local regulatory 00#14iity.--,iiifot:-City:Of Oronor: . -.......:*.•':'-.: .-:: '.-......1 ........ ' -•:.;.:..H.":3;- :•..-'1.-,,. ..••.'1.:...::... :.' ..:': .l',....;1.'.:..... r::..,:.1.„' ..:.:,1:: .'Property address:•2875:fok Street' _• .,".:-.•. ... ••- .•..,..•••• .' • :: . •.,.••. ''• : ,, .•-:•.: • ...',.. ...•• - ' .• ,.......-:... • . . . " : -. ..--. r .l.; ,...:0N0iFierlietitesetitativi -Victoria Terry .;:...':••••••.,....,•.- -..: •:.;. .:. . ,. •:.....-'......: ...:: •,•••..'..,:. ••-, I': Owners phone ,15124,364tili8-1--,...:...r••- .• - - • ,,..._ :,.. _. :..Jarref*stern•deicriiitlaa.::A0OraxhaatalY*46004ellaa eflididteaksiiii)ii0lialti:0,..111.i•siiition and 4:fto-11.4010)-:fiet Of fttotiod-rOot:bear .. . • ... ..: • . ..• . ... .... .. . . ., . _.: : . . .. . . . . . .- • - .• ,-.•• - , . • : .. --- . . . . . "•• -.•• . . , : - . • ... • ., . . ..• . . :.. :• • • •..SVO-etil4fliSS.' . .. - '•••'.".. ''...• ' .- .." ": . .. . ' - . .' ....v. .': . •"...-'•''': •. ..... ......:- • r•' . • ". ..-.. . ..-Syteiti.ilattii...oti datalrarritddtifYiy):. •10/26/202f:'...•, - .• "..: •'..'-•• •,. :-: .-.' . .....• - • :,. ‘.. ,••• •.-... ••-, - -...• •.:.• :' •• actinoliantdpoificitit.of caiiipitanae,• .: -.....•-..-•• •: .(:[1400.004flatit-,!-•Nkilielka noncompliance:'•••••: ;-"• ..• • • (Valid.04-3 ifiati.flintirepoit'date aidesa elidenCe.O.in -•.:•• - ••'Systems faitinMiei;retentilecalkiiatertiktatli'eeiini(tad.i*Oigetkor 1.Mtninentthinatte public health or safety*61).04 removal and ':•• -lieediacciitinnaCtwittifri:111.610100.01400.h5at•0*111.00c. - • -• -;•':abatement under section 145A.04i aubdivision.8..ft diseCitaintiot - ... ... •• .-,''"••••••• -• •.'.---"-: "'- .: ...- - -- -- --"' . . ' •• : -•:* - •. a abetter time riatno,e5dsta-in Local Ordinancej'•• ..' •: • .: - imminent-.*''Aifi4 *thS'il!'fr *141/9P004ehd''''sql''':fiTels .ml:usf 111:-.- • - - .. ._. . L___ ,.. _.., .,; ., ,, .... .. . -uPgtaded;replaced;:nrite'nee.elacontinned Within'lart•irt(sighs br receipt "• 1f..016.:Cotetillanco'indfares Conformal*"With 001474 -: .- -• .6fthii notice ei-.t4itn16,it ahortei-naiiee if iitianite;bidikaltiiiiianCe or• R 768045044its of system status date.above and dOe*A.of' under eaCtienr14$4;64'itibeivi.qien'a•• • ' . '.''. • ''* • '''• . 1" '• Remit:0(0 foi,nondOmPiinCe-OtteCii:all,:apOttarthiaf- •.'- -. -.".:-• -;. .••-.,4,.-..::"..•:::- • -...• ' :..• ... . ..-..: ' •iti Impact on public health(Compliance ailpijriiititrifi)4,i0iikei*Okoai**brib*41ih and*ifoly ...,LaTenli:intEikplti(c.onipliance coffiponant#2)..--.FiOnktoP106401304+4i1,0ir•-• .••••.--:-.. •••••. • .-....--- - ,'•-•;- • ".'7;'...••• ,* • . o Other Compliance Conditions(Compliance component#3) imminent thieatto public hilialth!ancisaki6c...'•. •::... ....Eq.Other Compliance Conditions 06.11164666.OiiiOfietIt 00...Piqiifitticiiiiimiiii.iiiund#4917. •,-: •:. ..I :•:. •,.,... .1. . t:1.60100ibit•a4eindOnio000iiiraiiiti. o Mili0;,g.. o.§0:*spoIdorhpOnoop6iipieleiit.-40, ...#0,00to..pii;‘eterpuherS4iOt p.spit-se0ralori(Poriii400eojroP•0001it#6),4-.Fitifit4i0Otii4iiiifti0*Eitiit •• .• •.......- ...' --. '•. .•• i-'.'• 1•• ' ":- ..:*•• •• ,... . . _ . . . ,... ., abpiiiting-peionioiiiiotitits 04ii,rioiiuitooitints_(dilloi4inite.604.00iietiiii.4)-4/itcaixtirf#4-.40r4tottifrogice.s.poifo.: I , Comments or recommendations '•.:-.•-. .:: ••' •.".. • .-'.- ....... ---.- . •.. -- '..., . ..- •...:.--....'.-....•..--:.. -:-.• .:..--• -...: .. ..,...,'. ,--. .-. There Is-1;5 feat.of sand under the rock-bedi.•-.• '.:..,.•-• •'- • ..., •,•.-:,..: • .:... •••:;• .-••••.::...,...,. . •....-.....:- ... .... : • • . •. . . 1130/t•Tdio efidieSouthesit:Ordpetty.'00.trier•jrati.:',04V:...-1004::: •• . - . 1 ' . .. , . ... • . - • - - . .. Certification . . . . . .. • • - .. . :. . ...:; : : ' . : . . . .'. ' . ' . .. ,...,' _.. . ' ': . ' . . . , . . . ._ . . .. ,. ... • • . • 4 haieby,doifi.ty that all the has been getberedto de!epnjne the cQrrpkance status of this;katix;AtOdetei#aerieo et.....: future system neifoirnanoeltaa beahnorcan2ba made due le titikadvinvendifiaits iiiiii4ctskatetitaensbuctii:40$01bleabtisoeitt*aYetem;.• .'.. inadequate maintenance,oriutate.water usage ; —•-• •. -- --•••-. - .-".•... •.. . . -.- . . ,..• -...• • . .. : •-• -••• -.. ••• - -'•• .„ ,. . .• • .•• . . .. ..... .. . .. . . ., . , •. .•, .• •.. • • . .. •..,...• .. •. . • • • .. . . . By*wog my name bOioiv,-./,tok to above--0!etoiwholo•..be..tioienoccorox.104.tosh4tit**fritedook1.001/.010.4 intophiii*:Ogit be 00c1*10000,Pe4?'cor*POis.tiii•10Mia..**111:*..: .:•:••....• .:.': :•..'• taisiniss r4ine!..liustiblariltait.&: .iiiiciiliatioi;totiifii-..:.. . :'l.'s- ::; ••-..•:•-• .: • • ....; . • .. - .... . :'0.01iffiatiiin•riui.nbei'‘01255...--:. . . 10,0peckiiogiiitiiiiii.. -...ii:4114...j.:.iiiiiii •,- '.• .•.,. ' .''' •-: :::. •... ••- .-...• .•••.•:.-....: I.:::..*:...-. ., •.-.. :- • ..-titietiodittii*r•tit6.,•-:.... . ".•: . . . . , . . .. , . . .. - • .-. . - •.. ::..... .obis.d.oconfint•h.st b*i.ii.0114100/00#/iiisir*O.'..:. .. 1.. • • • •:. •. . ....•• .. ...1...,' • ... • .-•:•.P.hohir.....7•6344.14.7.7i)- * PS•061*.•Or.locally ..eflOtied.supporting- -d00007.10ittati00.1iiiiii4•*,•#tt04.00f•-• . — --.: -:•-• •.. •••••••. • . 0.,Soil observation logs 181':§iiteiyitAs-Built 1.1:1 Locally required ferias V teek.'liitSOdiyAsietstneat•• ...,EIbperetlett Permii, III :..0:Other.information(list) - • . - . -- .-.."•• .-.' • • . ' • . : • ,:.:••.••:...-:•.- .1 ... .: . .:- .:•:. '•. '..." •- -..• •:.• ' . ' •, ...•• • . . . .. • • ... • • . • • - - . .. . . . ., .,. . . . ,. . . iittisjill..;4;.iiicil,.ixiiiimiii...oi.• :•.*:. ,41::0.6...6400‘... .•-. - .80te4...-4. *YOU•i;iti...4 ..fLii0-1-.Whi*:1• Aiiiiitif)ival.t60.1tiveit.ttnfts , 1...4-$V.i.I4c4b.'0 4/000i. .: • . ' •: . . • • ' . . .-..-.•• • • : 'I-.. ' . • 1 . .' . Page 4-44. • r . • .Property Address::.1675 Foie Street• .. .' gusinessName: `Rusty Olson-$oil b Iatian Testi ., • .. ;Date ttu28i2p21 . 1.: impact nn public health Conpiiance:component#1 of 5. Cart ,fiance criteria .. .._ :: Attachedfsupt itt documentation System discharges_sewageta'the. '`lp Yes' .No l� . ground surface: .. Ot?er .`�. . •. .•. N Nofapplicable System discharges Sewage to drain i•0 Yss# !aka.. • 'tile or surface waters. : system causes sewage backup..into ' C Yes`: 2 No dwelli. or establishment.:. .. Any'yes"artas+rerabove indicates`the syra ad'i is an Imminentthri*f td.public heaitfi aotl stifotk '. • Describe verifitiii on methods and results;: t • VistiaL Nothing was found • • • • j tankintegrity Compliance component#2 of 5 : • . :.fit .liaat;e:criteria:` • tie suppor rig dbt umentatfsin Syste►►f consists of a see {-- _ .---,- •—. • Less col,d page pit O Yes .O Na ' p ryweli,leading pit,:. • Freely°tank()r�•ewed.by trrspector '..tit other it? • Name of maintenance b anusiness •Sewage tank(s)leak below their p.Yes" �Nc designed operating depth? • License nymber of malntenanee bysinesir �_ lat+~,of maintenance Existing tank`Integrity assessment(Attach}.., • .. if es:which se. a t. .. s leaks Date of maintenanOe.. 1t)/l12021 • • (mm/e yyyy) • (must ba wdliin hree:years) Any"yes"answer above Indicates:the system .(See tloje rnstnicitons to ensure assessment.complies is failing to protect titer Mini..R:7082 0700 ubp 48(1)1 .: 0 T8nk is NoncximpIt nt(pumping_not s.necessary eifpiain below) Ll Other Describe verification methods and results::.. Albrn's Septic Pumping:pumped the ititi.kt. S . . • • • bttps//www:pw.state.irrn:us 651-39600 .` . wq-wwistc4.33b'.4/28/201 8D065�- t4 • tlse,yourpreferredreWysenrit4., Au �Wbie::makemadveformats • Property Address: '2675 Fox Street Business:Name Rusty Olson Soil&percolation Testiity Date iOt28/202t• • 3. Other compl-iance conditions Cr mpliance:componerlt 3 of.5 3e. Maintenance hole covers appear to be structurally Aitotiod(daataged cracked.,etc.),or.unsecuried? fl Ye's" .i No `I Unknown 3b •Other issues(erect/foe/e/hazards,eta)to immediately and adversely impact public hea•lth or safety?t1 Sres"•-0 No D Unknown .*Voi•to 3a7or an ialislnont tfweeit te 0ibliObeeith*nasafety.: 3c System.is non-protective of:ground waterfor other:conditions as determined by inspector? • '.p-Yes • 3d ::Systian notabandoned n.accordance•iKtth Minn R::74I80 2500? Q Yes* 121-No •'FYes to 3c:or 3d-System is falling to protectgroundwaterr Describe:veri6catiott methods and.results• . Visual Nothing was:found • Attached-supporting dociimettatlon 0.Not applicable • . 4. .Operating permit and nitrogen B.MP` Compliance component#4 of 5 [ trot- p i�cabl Is the:system operated under an Opei`ating Permit? : . IDYes` Opp :If"yea",A.below Is.required Is the system required:to employ a Nitrogen BMP specified 4n.the system•design?;::()Yes p No- If"yam B below is.required AMP Best ManagementPisotice(s)specified in:.pie system a esigki If the enSwee to both questions is"no"this section.does not need titi be completed Compliance criteria: ' ;, a: Have the operating.permit•trequirementsbeen met2 C]Yes :b No b is:the required nitrogen BMP in place and..property:functioning?•'b Yes. :Ono .Any if.n"answer Indicates noncompliance:. Describe verification methods and Attached supporting:documentation: •0 Operating permit(Attach).:'' https:f/W :pcdstate rri+:us' •• 65I296.630 + 800-657.38.64 • Use•your preferred relay service • Available In alternative formats wq,w*iits.iib. •4/28/2021. Poge3.of'4 • • . . . . . . . . .. • • - - • Property Address -2675.Fine Street . ....•,- Bus mess Nitak...fieity;.tiison.aolliaeroelitine Testing •". . *- ..• ':.Date:• 10/28/2021- . . ... -. S SOIL separation—Compli4nce cortii4Onetit'ttS...cif t• .__. . . . . . .. . bate of installation ,si0/2012011 .• .;1- :...•.latkiknownl...-. • - - . . • •...• . . • :-.. . , . " .. • •".. .. ... • • . . . . . .•••• •. .• • . ..6hOrilatiOVV.Ilitieafil PrOteptiOli/FOOttr.'".......• ....0:4.icosp..-:.0 No• • Attached supporting iiiittiMentiffior.i: • ,• . . . .• • ..• . . • ."• .. .... . - , .- Soil observation logs completed for the-report • triiii-. tahce criteria- Select one';'.._... :... . •• - .**--; •-'.. ...•:....:' .:-....t)Two previous of requited voilitat$00Ortfon; . . ... _ . _ . ,.. . „. ... • •,„ . • • . Set For OYsttms,built priattoAfiiii.t-1996,and .0.-.Yes 0 No* • •' ...01;ipt applicable(No Solt lreabt-tt*rt area) . ..,,...•.•'.i.::.....-".: .. : . . . . •..•.. not located in Sfionviand or Wellhead : • . ... .•••••• . ...'• .• • - • .,•••..• •;. - •• • • •••Protection Area of,netsensing a food, •...:'..•... • ' '• ' - :-....: - 12: , .: ....: • .-,•.s.••• . boyethgeptIodijing establishment- . ..•.......... . . . •• • . .•. ,. ...• . •..,.-• .• • ... . . -. .••-,•Drainfield•his at least a.two-foot vertical.••:• ...„ .•, . , • ....,• . . -.. ..•.... • • . ._ . . ..separation distance from periodicallysaturated soil or bedrock. .• . •'...,- .., . .... .: . • . ..• . • • .. . . .. . . - - . - • . .• - -.-• ... .. • .. ., . . . . . -,. :. : • ..,...... .. , 51i.,.Nco-Pei-kanariaii0istims built': : "-: • •-• . .)," Yoe, 0.NO!'..* Ittdkitie.:4iigtha.01:0javatibn*.-,..... : • . •.- . . :•Aptit t 199a or later cirefornon,..-• . ;- - -•... --' • • '- •••• • ' ••- -•:::•. -...-, , 1. •,••••••,...-•- • - ..••'•'''. •`. -.• • • • • A.Bottom of distribirtion media:. . ' ... 1110'9 - •-- ' ••• ppeonnanee'systems located in.'Shoreland • —7.•'••••••••• ':.1 • ••••-•:'.• '••• • - - • • , • - IS • - • ' -:-: - •-071441/head Proteceon Ateas or serving a'. '••"'" *" • . . . .' 8•Paiiedicallv.:: tarot d• Mita . . Vi toixt:betietage,;•oriodgingestabliehMent •••:•• •••... ..••• •.•• - • •-•- - -. -.,. •, .-. • - •• • •:- ; ...•••••.' ,• .....• ••••. '...1 - . . . . . . • ••• • - -- . •••• •-.., • ;•.tyiiiitil,arinaiation. ,-.- . :.. ...• :.,:34. . .. . .. . . . . ,Drainfield has til4ree-ftiOf viittical.. . • ... . . .. .• separation distance from periodically--.• .• . b-;'.R4-34:iiiieipit Oarbilitatide iiitoarailOn, . ''255- -.•.. ,..°••,•• -•!atiitateif soil: 01--bedrock f..* -;.•-. . . . . . ...• •" • :.•. .,. ... - .. , . . ..; • •• . *May be:reduced up to I 5.0iiiiiiht.itit!oiked.;bir..1:400Ordinance -. . . . . - • - • •• - • • - • ... -. . . , - .... .. -,. -..• . - --• , • .66.-76)eixotniE4en-"Oilier..or'reeoiiiiaiice" • .1:3 Yes El No. - ....... -, .......-.....,..-..--.. ....,.....- ::::::. . • •. . .. .-.•systems built under pre-2068•Fea1eSi ; • •.•:. .' ••• . .., -..--• • ••:.• •; • -i ••.•••••••... • I•: 2 . •: . . Type IV or V systems built ander,20.0$:• .."••:• •• - • ..' .. • •- .• • - . .- - ... - 'Raleett)86.•.23.60.61-10Eibl460 .. •' • •••••••• •.• ••• . - - • • ' f.(intennediate inSpectori.ielnee•req4iiad$-. - • ••i.2,600 gallons per day Advanced 11000Ottir License required>2,500 gallons PercleY)..... • • . . . ,.. . . Dtainfielit;rneete the detignect‘iertider...-...' ••7- . .Separation distance fromperfodicallY '..: ...'',...-.. saturated soil;orbedroOk, .... :..:..: . • -. ' . ._ . . . . .. ;: -•- • • • *Aoy'.176"answer abovelndicatos-the:System is fallisititopioiett'groignd*iitir... ... — : -, .• - .... . . . . . . . . Describe methods and results • .• • • . • • •. • . . . . . . . . ... .-. . . . .• . . . . . . . . . .. . . . Upgrade feadirernentat(Minn 'Stat.§1.15:55)An imminent threat to public tiaii,th-Aiietivite.iy(110/48):itivit be upgraded,.replaced or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice at:Witte/1a Moder/1016d if taqatied•loykkal ordinance if the -•• •.•• system is failing to protect ground wile];the system must be ungtadedi mpladett;•eilla uSediscontinue.dwithin the time by local-ordinance.It an existing system is failing as defined in law,and-hasatleastiWoleit of design soil separation,then the ,'• Istem need not be upgraded,ispalted,:repliited,oritsuserliSoontinued;••.tratWittistandingenylooalordinantiethet is Meni•striOt. --pri3v.iSien does not apply tosyStems in.:shone-land arita, Wellhead'Pittes.tie.n Areas or Those used- in'ciiii06Ction.,wilkfijo 4. evetege,and lodging.establishments as defined in law. -..r.• -• •. ..-... ' •i, •• •-•-, -::::: - •-: . • - -; . - : . •••:. .--.•- . : .• - ... . . . . fittoi://iiwAi.pqa...itate.iinsi.izi: :• 6.51',29643.60• ' •.r.• .800;65*384... .• ksie,icilitpkifeFiiii.ieldi service ••• Available in.afteriath;e:fortnits 14q4.1e0s44-314 4' 4h414.d4.1 Page,4 014: 202t ;SEPTICMAINTENANCE REPORT > 75 ox St(aria Teriy i(N4?:/ O2i.,.. pamped. '2'1QQ ; . Nurnberaf.teinlitr :� titer lat puntped>. . . : -. Aibints Septic Pumpi�g, LLC w+ea�,nli�+ o : : ;; (I ddn sine).. •Is th :system funct ing:propeti7;Yet:' (Iesla dieingi,witiiptisInthedr l J .D`Ypu has any specific or issaes tint y 'd' .to di 'ridtlt t1�e SSlSPr ri i Mee ? L+to I sa, Indicate best tMte and fetionne number(S)to be between$aint and 4 pm . Tunes Telephone Numt ) • RETUR$IN Ste` ASSOO iPOSSIBLE. Apkia Jdhnsort1111111111111111111111111 .. CITY OF ORONO • PO BOX S6 CRYSTAL BAY MN 653 401,- - st 469Q1�•e OLLUt®t Sewage tan .' t4 CONTROLAG NcrT .520;skate Reed Marth • maintenancereportirng form Faun MN`55155-4194 • ata lam: . _. ' t Sytlttettgel►(SSTs) P�nagrain Pc . cu of 3ubeurtoce�T w o Systems($ST8)aetmportntto nsue ,_to env rid ste ve fr nt.-Compiatton rill*fon coMPOecistet the seemes.tankMetetenense n under Minn.R.7080.2460 and 7082.0600.This fo n.ear be used fo certify thecomplance stsbus of the ammo tank mmts.of lu SSTS.Th lean fr not a *>1SSTS: ►epart nnIif a ter motet may ody cy:e 1-arm VI*ycempt be r ledy�a�ndysignye�d en peg$ b a 4us�Fei6ip �". t : Atop,/ofW kA 1Cl r n , b A tte o�neri i3N Othe�e dosend bee W the ktroj,90_•687111TOWIllf iX0010,,lliora pesiod of Sae(6),yearafein the rneintentamedalevhfainterwrce Nporpr+p iD OW:*Ili iggt cf pa+bmm t mar ttl.rmr r by l ordinance.Chedt wfth yotritkscel SS:1'S tmcg►am for rn 4emare asconktg;pr+olaaot, . .. _. ::Seai maintenance hale a . . • • MI me int nsnos holecov *Mt be.retumed to saMitte In a entmd and durable coadtdonand he casarbleaf watt bnang , lost - `Covers va #be r in accantenti04661 Mb R.'7080.24a0,subp.O.Items C a'Ds' •. _:a) Cry t tr- tme 5r bud Crdlnances adepladeller:•Fabiway4,2008 must be .;boIlett or Mir:5Meed or must be 96 pO- in r t.They must be Moe of makirlal sultehlw for'G .:�. Use. io depradddad and leeks,and trot to bera slid ar Wed.They must hese a label 1.0,17Millg of hazardoustandSlems MMikis the teak AN`mseer. rnyst.ho Vie,: b)•. C0r- a in tm' for or 5t add'-! F ft - . 4,2008;Must meter be burl s4 st bast 12lose at - •• sail cover or be sealogl according to the local ordinance In erevt befsmfebrears 4,2006. c): Covets. t n item`if,abuse when raised to the ground ot�le than 12 leach font the pound stilton: . • ' •P -. information'.. . - ti^ 5.ef ni trey 10t02t2021 'itioislititlor rice►:Maintenance&edir-ifant insnectort. roper 'addeeeea..`2675 Fox Sf . ...,. p• 041172 • . tars 4rono ON ..._. 2*code5531 1 ..�; I oieen?s name:: Victoria'TetrX . .: . ' . :..... . P r addresilfabtont: ; . ' . .. •.},,... '.,:_f:.• . Y:W-V++rk/M-. .w r . . ice�. • • a ni ✓ram. -. L •. • 2T'. a. n u .. Pttoeientnnher 612-730-1081 ' : .,.•• add toriatenv1t msri com . 1. Did you. . e e of scum stud$?.•Cl Y'ar I$Na met:pun per wttteout . . • t .. — , *. • used to l tie: 131 Mihit11.041.1climiiii:1 coot !J a hoktbg.taM,gD1t t 1MMtow) .n-'n-e-'iai•haW. U , t Modred he ptete. : Yee:':C'No `Ifno,Itt 0/1 s ilt • �Nm ej•teo bs pta�tl pratt4tl11`iit� e hole,*• we them complete and sign.tune firs! • • - . I,. _ -'• .MAIM to Ecmilittie remoirei ofthesdidei 1d Iiciddithl001 rthe rni ti misers„ hole.I undwsland that removal of Ocide endildulds through other access points is snot considered 0 conplant method'ot•• eoilde.teentosetsand dass not iutfit the removed rem, of it v ft,7080.2460 end 7082.08_00, . =BY lydw r reynern behrr,I cert6y the• s m s 1a tubeto:beityintnt perfect tiv the best o ,my lee loupe,and that ion can be used for the purpose of processing this!oxen. . Olmer's as,. _ 0 . • :.. " • . .... . „ ... ..... . . „ , $00'637 E .0'. •:tWotl 10 riti�eril lee. :. 0 to e.akerlat 4 • • INt RMOTA•POLLUTIOK • Sewage aatik. • ._ .CO�NTROL:AGitfNCY • • . . maintenance reporting :farms • Sri Pout 55155�4144 - ` a • ,t• ►stems OMITS) Proem* • p,n ..R: r�nc ,,, tt of + sewaOO The eOt:Eiatom5:(s8ret see Impottent to ten. • r itinftwr Completion antis,farn•cpmollss with Me sewage tank maintenance requirements under M2no.R.7080.2460 and .0600.Th form may be tised.tocefttfY the conkelbehoe stm ot the ee w e t eomparaents of gut SSTS nti-form not a complete SST$ 'e ort►orlr a tank Inteartly renNeernent,and may - ;• , $. r. F.a ; ,,o indd etiptedettptige 3 by a mantled profeeetoneL braleuotteran Acopyo in rntrat;t . tot p+ s n3Q.t of the n t emllhetnalet i d ,.by tlicensed Sl3T$m.- t L°.^' F tea period olive(5)y from the maintenance d1Aa Mokriet#amoe repoelrtp b the kcal unt of goifensfonnt may be raVred by' Chock watt your torei-SillSarowarn formakeover,*report i SeCurelnaintenike hole cars -../klimeintensnoe hole covert new be rrlurnM do OOP**tita oined sad dwrable rtoadttlon and bet web,*of wMtti hardtop tits ,, .. �., • t:0vsr rnu the r s.} in *Ith Mtr►ri,R 7 L24 0,.. 3,hems G irk'D a) Cc" Mattel undo-r local Febnimy 4,2008 neat°be ikkarkboteder sarlt55d erettiet.be.96 pAtinfle inwtt They Must be inotit of•Motorist a for outdoor use,rest to ofireeklat degradation and teats,and not swcopette to being slid ortimed.They must have a lebet seaming Of t t condition*inside the tatik../yi sorsa ..• • opera rrat be roster . • bj: CoCovve inatailed uriettr Iciest ondinsoces add before Feb:very 4,2008 must either bo.buriededis.ialleist 12 memos ad. cover or bo Ted moorelryg to tt Nee'?ordinance In effect before, 4.2005. COVC7.1 neat meet Item`r,'above when raised to tire:ground surface.ortaaa•than 12ksdisis frbi th 9 . • 'Repoirttl information Al*of it 10/02/2021 R en fOr n*inbrnaeo .Memtenance,.&Coi�tciiance 1nsp+ ction • 2674 Fox.St _ to 041`1°7234 •... • .car., i ►; lN • Ppewtyown f r om* Victoria Tend► :. <: . ,• •. •• •• ' ._ Pa t; _ _.. ... • .� •:..-..,:• may. _..: _ _ - rrts staler:� -.�' att=+ vw riatem1( COIR i?lri nrYftber: 12-730-10$1: • .. • 4.. y anent the umutatbn ol'soa mastitis 7 G£Yes %INo Vie) t+ � -.• • LritrAciel,145 tl:Rr "'s :111 1 . LPI, .• . • _.A u""' to simm� � e'too- i�:Other(t reteasa trcikilp tawik.t to 4 betaae) 3. ffthe nvOartAnsiton hoI*t used, nU coves .sectOetl In picot.' Y e . No tF#ro, eogalifrt bit" if tree owrr r^ to it a Subs sewe l ent lid($818)to:be pimpedt t ih' sane how tenet limos complete l"rya the fellos4ng 0.0bittiOOOt. I, M. . • ,repass to st ow the fwu( r!of t e sotds. d Iquids ttrwugtlhS hate.a 0 to~that rem oftirintsend through oA access'paInts is lief ceri$dend e►. mettrod of $aBde lerfKIM and does not fulls the*OW>rerrrov&ret*Itostmto cf 1111noJi.j499,2A150 ont 0e24180. 4lIttpl► 1. gar payer It be:' ,totIttly the above.ntef to bitty,and conao«ti to the beat of my edgeM1d:.s >ttmttNs `lon:con be used for the,purposes prooes this Icon • . • Owner`s s t3 :(rrlswdd l.... • • .. • I . le4,r.. ss . @i1 0 r: peatl r IhRY rp ^ '' 4 • AriaM klsiM reatereteseas•f!1/7t • 0 Mgr ed h ees. 2875-FOX 5►t .. t i 04117 3430003. c Qrono „ _ .:. �...8f ata: II�N 7Jp codes 55391 • g letli ttt eee Ieeky (Exsrnplb; c j 010 TF . DYes D No • V mew mod: Took fit:.Q lfai [}NO Veriftmow meta uesd �. 'avidatoic he toff Tank rpgilm t rth++ •Took Note ibpvtfok, i'::•doworood,crsdor0.unSrid,cr �Tcatk 13 Yes JRN Yea. f No _ ,+� rT Z �„� ❑Yes Nor Yel l t '►r No • Q Prae yt: nt Tsn c Cl Yes. fl No_ • Yen Q t:J Yeas `C1 ,.�'.�.�.". 7. ' of s>r( a firer rerrtored s' `I`atdc#i: 1000 .*Tank 10Q.0 Pnetreetment T * T Aim $,. :loom em rertita,ippro Wasfetvrber fear;D Land Q Olher Eigirmiton(Rift r+ De tog: _WaIen n, .r �..�.. fr'• fT*yc"y° ter 3 op••aar ol„t% c'or 8* r-4 �0 th* t*rliii100111'.g�lw7 0 Yee ®No , If yes,entity t k artdf:exptaln:, . d eolert.95 ofne o€tsstio waste Q gaflte(s)bad QEffutiritleolon pc "i 0 a3 dit nkarfd`atMMMa h *).. AdY?fTer�D.hoie and extension ,condition. 0 ah6f orrs�> • t ,a*t t!ippoiri opi by bra: T m mn ., • R darned by Replaced alarm float switch in thepumptank .Cleaned effluent filter w/alarm in:2nd:tank outlet. : • Or for oerria':'s • .'PYlatpi record oftiviiratectd the gwioak rrat iits*crf AeAltaVofa i irrtesadi lk,�irrsed: T3.AiiM�MrJo►o Ap uoui yr pe E7 M o rionoMMhd indNidrmE+Mto 60o rooOlvo ' treinlrig,: *ark ro+rtsi0r.and pw(tiIdo moo++,o: .:)(!As 4designated wed Aldividto►i Oftlte kiiihess nst bedo r:. !Ns IffommOor cam ba ustd 1br the ptapo or prose tie forgo. c "°" ;.f6 the a .•for w19d�1�, tl fait a1►a!lh :oyi , codify the t =� rrri to bb tnaKr end Irotimpsay I:teffaWon On Comp r new Albin*s Septic Pumping, LLQ. P dt name •Peter Peterson �Np a rind* 3346 stir on number:4t 8227.•. :... ..r..: •'Enrae 'aibinsseptt um,in• �' shoo co r i +� Pttrru►t 612 �5�9 2458 ..�:.. •Eit* ,w;.:. t�sne tm r+lolyif7.,10 O2/2Q . I MIir,0 . • 651296.6300 • coo 73s64 �. 161�0ur0� hMtltl l �tftl*e +�. ____FiRlfllq !!}brAz i( •: t .. 2$75fox t .�;• , �.. ..� . . f fa} 04. 1172343.. .0303.. t qr •Qrono : •, •• ' ►MN ,. :� .,w, 2Ip ' S5391 . • moist iettion: rank Compliance Certifl t(tank Integrity mnentj •iltki forth i^2, c. tyitini•irrf;.stforiireWertes+d Oefieirtlffie SevirSgs tank-cofnpHm reactors.I.e."► thitifortkcOmpieted,may L" '' as a tank lit assessment. . ' rii+t�! .. : . SSTS; »� 11 <; f_ of the tam may tae oar and by a C.eetllisdifrmfviduel(Gtatf tltrertaed 4 B q who f o conducts the.necessary procec faros io`.assess me con ',Of eildbleeago't c b, fie Win, • When this. of of the tam Is a.va, ed by e ,It beoorne i.rie o eig doapn$e rraff rr to an . EAstirp n Comte lnisperXratReport:Carnaim oe kit Corm-00210yoiepl ktpletee.31f This ctm cen fast found-oriels MIPCA frttps/lw+uw pba. mn • •Tom, 5 certl. statement on this ft= rquir+ what (Wising septic boltcartlptlance status is.00tinsdned by en ttss SSTS inwareciirthey subwils an impedes sport This.fire rePreeneetledierlY lowesselerd of 8$TS complimen and Is*lovable under-Minn:R.7082.0700 eubp.4 item(8).obtain(1),,'1 a form is vedld te a petiod of • c r data on this by owreroroanefs agent d Offs Ruts for thisactivitycenbe*Sung at Minn: R.7082.0700.subp.4.••- 3C;and D;7083.0730Item C. . - � $ C n � +-t e ;,ri Moditfdf M��.k C� .Airrrn eigthra:-•5" , rtt; Select el the ably: $I The SSTS does not contpin a mapeng 04(*typo', . •- 'C]'The SSTS.has a-soteogopcamPeci,drivel*, • d a, all;or other p • ieedtingp .or other ph -'Fad to Prated aft does not contain a Etime tank•that was ded ,d".• Off" : m bps well but u i tests betawte„ u tt�ire�s a sewage We.ihatwas*MOO!to be ••s- • • . ,iseetight,but subsequently leeks Women d el n.d It does not twit eh imminent sanity threat by • • operating depth—'Failure to Preterit fir." reams of tar, ,ar orate•. Ci Its presents a threat to public safety by mason e/ mat hat carols)or other . ."+nxeectued,demigod.or weeini "Welder*hisheld Threatc�a`wK(a);aar he ft ' O! : Cirtlied blfjifvldt 1 ": fieoik Aibinn's Septic Pumping, LLCi... •Print f, ne Peter petEs ; su t>o number ;3346. _• 7� :,..•• . ...w.. miser •••922 !;p r tar Me walk descatheda�e as:a Ce.OFed>hatvfda t ofa ir*,nssota-used SETS BrOvst f ,n aonducted"tha ne ra y proia duies io assess the et each Stengel**tor*le C OY .• , f.r,my»+!tt,b4 ,t certity the above istaferrtenta to be trite end Qorreot iF Melee:Cur y Mat this fritrin~alf7 be awl far the purpose'of .. storm. t7e Cedif, :inc" 'a 8: % t= • t]ab (mluII 10/0212 1~ .• •667r295G0 • • • . `Soil•:Observation L g • . WWw.Sepric1Zesoutce corn vets I2 4 Y 1raperty itwner/project:, ..•Victoria Terry : . Date 1.0/28/2021: 'roperty Address f.P0:. • 2675 Fox.Street,.• ,.• parent natl*::. '•Cant C1 O -- : Ci t.acustnne t ailwrwm .R c U 8edrOck .:: .:,. andscape posititnt;. : '..i.;:t Sulrimmit•:... • Q Shoulder ' ';2 SIde . • - . .. slope CL'7be slope • oil.su vey map units UV . . : slope; :•"%. -direction Lineal : • • foil dog#T • •• I { C]Boring 0 Pit Elevation 102.4 Depth to SHWT 54 Inches Depth(in) Texture fragment% matrix color redox color consistence grade shape :. loose loose single , 6: :Mound sari .l ill Q511 fnFtble `weak greater:..btocl • •tnofleate .p ittee •pfe[y. Wit. .:: strong ..ymasive I 3648 Loam -<35 10yr3/l Fnable 48-54 Clay Loam . Q5` 10 i. .. • ' Friable .strong. Ofo*.. . • 5.4�60 Clay Loam . ; :<35 10yr413 I Oy4/8,14h0y._ Firth:. Ong... i. Blocky 35 loose loose• ftaabie weak g 3�;-�5© . uter blocky >50: • :moderate : pris►natic .PhO rigid: . • strong massive . ,lts: 'IBM:.Top.of..$0 .✓at prop�tycorner ironElva-10Of:• , r �{y.,,,,���.,.. xn Y 'A rk r, ty r ar .a ki fi . }. a'�T !, � •*, T ti rr , h�'�`���'`O�C SW.GC� F = +` a >*w;.�' �`M,.. ��o� � ��`� ,"�`b � r���'1 �t�, `�F�.._ � 4.�` ., " M • Qi boring: 0 Pit. •Elevation 102 4 : .: Depth to SI{WI' . 54 Inches •.. 'PPPthin)• Texture' fragmrtent% • '_tnattliccolor • redoxcalor consistence grade .shape loose • loose single •grain 0-36 lvi uttd Swd Fell iS .. -friable weak granular blocky firm moderate. ,. . Prismatic Pam: ::mod: •.. •••s rong.;. •• .•... r►essiyg. 36-48 loam • ..C35 •10yr3G1. Friable :Strong . .•: Blocky" • • 48»54 ClayLoatit., -• �i5,. • 1.Oyr3l able Stag Blodry' 54,,60' Clay Learn . :<35 .1:Oyr4l3 10yM81=CF10y Firmc' Soong: . • • • • loose. . .•- loose, single •gram - .. `friable: weak 35-50 granular blocky 'firm• ..• :moderate :.•prismatic•platy.. >sp: rigid �* �1 y slicing massive 7'5 FOX4►S i t: a J} 4 e '* x, y�r ;..'Mr °a{A fT 5� ''' r +4': . r . .N� :� ��,1 v � a�'.. ,.,Y�aa-:�a�., rA%?. > ��bQr, �'arr,ynlc•-,.. �'bt- Msa'��h.,� - ,1:,�+ �G'�. FY ��. LI Boiing. ❑Pit. Elevation: .. Depth to'SHWT0 Depth(in) Texture fragment% matrix.color ..•.., redo color consistence. : •: rado 7 .. . :shape. <35 . loose-.• _ , loose.• single grain 35 5d friable weak • . . granular blocky'.. >50- • fool moderato prismatic play rigid: ' strong massive. Q ` : loose loose smgtexrain' 35-St)•• ' friable vyeak granular blocky >5:0 film moderate prismatic Play' rigs Sri rig: massive . �3S.`: loose loose. suaun 35-.30 friable weak: granular blocky; >50• inodel�ate prismatic platy . _ rigia :. ; stron massive. • loose loose smotegratn . friable weak 35-50 . granular bto, firm moderate: prismatic platy. 550.: ;'rigid.. . Wig- massive. �3S loose loose single:gra n •35 •5l):'• • triable... weak: , granular blocky •moderate pnsmanc pla•ty • ` mas sive• .. , , . . strgng... s. • here.by ce y . thic worlewas complete:d'iit accordance with.MN 7083O awl any focal req s -.:: : ' ' •Rusty Olson's$oitl&Ferc 810 • ignerSgnature - 'Company•:. License•# • • • -. : CITY OF .. 'WORKSWEET FOR'SEWAGE DISPOSAL'S 011t', . • Bat ^l I . Inspector 1` 1 t�. c O 116.E 80d41g Permit Na { ONaier. '-' ".i ,...PA.. .. .1 ,1 u rr, v• Property Address i [ldiri� .' '" • . Plumbing Contractor-Outside Sewage:;Disposal L4 t 4;'j '4'' '�y '$► . 'Septic.Tanks. Mate•r►a! •�..E CC.1 .. .. > l i tGtH:: cites : ,�..4-Ott5 :Proper OOtkii& Inlet/ .. • . t,; �e."T - .Baffle Plates?': + ^' Drain Fielis .• Total length of:limes• Number'of lines - ; -, Typet.of soli: .. :percolation Test'.• 3 r:P-'" 44'.'.. ype.of filter •Cc'4 ci C 4,v ., Width of:.trench -� (ti t•... Amount di filter materiel be• low:line'LL •- : A- .- 1 •Depth from top"of the to finished gradei, ''1 �2.- ._ ., Check.Vents � . • Check Caulking :•_ . . I Check Grade'in Rorizontat Waste Pipes • `'� . •.Clean Outs-• r. I 4111) Tonga or Yards of Filter Material:.2 _yArs ' Totai'Sq. Footage cf brain Field 'r7y�� �. • Sand , ', •�.C.;)► k-i e f'b, _ flock K � • Overall.Size of Mound'Systetr ab:.)( Site of::-Mound System;Rock Filter Material ,_.-..,,,. • Draw detailed diagram to_scale with"measurements•below .. ., E -... i-.'" .!'''..-. ..1-.. L. . . . .. . • - • • � . t 3 - 'f ': ,yry� �+ :tCs� +k �►. • ft' . • ••... . • • . .. . . ..... .. .. .,. ....... . . . . . .... . . . .... ... 1 PC Exhibit J 38 04-117-23 31 0006 38 04-117-23 42 0021 38 04-117-23 43 0012 DOUGLAS&JANE RASMUSON CUSTOM ONE HOMES LLC ERIKA KAHLERJERIK KAHLER 585 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S 652 BIDENBERG DR#103 CHRISTOPHER KAHLER • LONG LAKE MN 55356 WOODBURY MN 55125 2725 RAINEY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23 34 0003 38 04-117-23 42 0022 38 04-117-23 43 0013 SHARI MANOLAS DANIELSON WHITE OAK CIRCLE ASSOC SUSAN S VICKERMAN 2811 FARVIEW LA OF LONG LAKE 2685 RAINEY RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 2720 WHITE OAK CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 34 0004 38 04-117-23 42 0025 38 04-117-23 43 0014 RICHARD T NOLAND DANIEL C MIDDLETON JEROLD DAVID KAMINSKI 2801 FOX ST CAROLINE L MIDDLETON SUSAN M KAMINSKI LONG LAKE MN 55356 2725 WHITE OAK CIR 455 HIGHCROFT RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23 34 0006 38 04-117-23 42 0026 38 04-117-23 43 0015 AURELIE HYRIEN LAURIE J&STEVEN E JENNIGES CARRIE DELLINGER MATTHIEU HYRIEN 2715 WHITE OAK CIR RICHARD DELLINGER 2800 FARVIEW LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 2730 RAINEY RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23 41 0004 38 04-117-23 42 0028 38 04-117-23 43 0016 ANTHONY M SARENPA ET AL RYAN BLACKWELL JASON SMITH&JODY SMITH 2630 FOX STREET NATALIE BLACKWELL 2690 RAINEY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 2620 FOX ST WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 • 38 04-117-23 42 0001 38 04-117-23 42 0030 38 04-117-23 43 0017 JESSICA LIND GEORGE FUNK/JUDY ROGOSHESKE TREES TO BE ASSOCIATION 2660 FOX ST 540 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD W 2685 RAINEY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 LONG LAKE MN 55356 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23 42 0003 38 04-117-23 43 0002 38 04-117-23 43 0018 MICHAEL K JACOBSON YVES D ROUX KIRSTEN&PATRICK BURTON 2690 FOX ST 2765 FOX ST 2601 RAINEY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 38 04-117-23 42 0004 38 04-117-23 43 0003 38 04-117-23 43 0019 L M STUBBS&D E STUBBS JOHN DEGARMO&SANJA DEGARMO TREES TO BE PRIVATE ROAD 2720 FOX ST 2675 FOX ST ASSOCIATION INC LONG LAKE MN 55356 WAYZATA MN 55391 2685 RAINEY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23 42 0005 38 04-117-23 43 0009 38 04-117-23 43 0020 MELISSA JILL MUNSCH DAVID E PETERSON ANDREW JEFFREY ROTSCH 1001 WILDHURST TRAIL 2625 FOX STREET 650 GANDER RD ORONO MN 55364 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23 42 0006 38 04-117-23 43 0011 38 04-117-23 43 0021 • MINNETONKA ALANO GROUP MINNETONKA ALANO SOCIETY JAMES WINLAND HORNIG 2760 FOX ST 2760 FOX ST JENNIFER JORGENSEN HORNIG LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 730 GANDER RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23 43 0022 DENNIS F KUMLIN • 1460 ST PETER ST#105 DELANO MN 553281 38 04-117-23 44 0004 KIRSTEN&PATRICK BURTON 2601 RAINEY RD ORONO MN 55391 38 04-117-23 44 0005 FERGUS WEIR&MEREDITH WEIR 710 GANDER RD WAYZATA MN 55391 • 0 PC Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Exhibit K Date: 8/15/2022 III \\)-\\ Ice } to W 44 Ph S7".. b.4%,N) 0 I C I I r '* :1i ... ..........,„ . _I _____. , ,..,..., C 1 Y la t ,. I ir) "'' . Farview. n II tgiw-...,,...._... —. cz '}4 CO 0 te ,00 P rerrch Cie, ui- P.rvierve IMO Buffer Size: 500 0 100 200 400 Feet Map Comments: I i i i I ( t i I 2675 Fox St This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury • or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55487/gi s.i nfo@h en ne pin.us • Date Application Received: August 16, 2022 0�T Date Application Considered Complete:August 16, 2022 . VO 60-Day Review Period Expires: October 17, 2022 To: Chair McCutcheon and Planning Commission Members yF Adam Edwards, City Administrator `-1kESH00' From: Laura Oakden, Community Development Director Date: September 19,2022 Subject: #LA22-000045,Addilay Homes o/b/o Robert Hannah, 1153 Elmwood Ave, Variance, Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting street and side yard setback variances. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The property currently has a detached garage that encroaches in to the right of way and a deck along the side of the accessory building connecting to the main door of the home. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing garage and build a new garage that is attached to the existing house. The new garage addition will create a new front door to the home and will • connect to the existing sidewalk along the south side of the home. Due to the grading and elevation of the home,the new deck is proposed to connect to the existing sidewalk on the south side of the house. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information:The applicant has identified the substandard property,the unique configuration of the right of way bisecting the parcel,and the setbacks of the existing home as practical difficulties supporting the requested variances. Additionally,they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds the practical difficulty standards are met. The property is substandard as it pertains to size and width. While the home meeting the setbacks for the zoning district there is no conforming building envelope to allow a garage within reasonable proximity to the home.The property is unique due to the right-of-way which crosses through the parcel limiting the building envelope. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-330—Setbacks: DISTRICT LR-1B Required Existing Proposed The existing garage encroaches Home with Rear/Street 30' 2' into ROW, outside of property attached boundary garage 15' illNorth Side 7.5' 9.5' No Change LA22-000045 September 19,2022 Page 2 of 5 South Side 7 5' Existing House-9.5' Addition -9.4' Existing Deck-4' Deck-5.9' Lakeshore 75' 92' No Change Average Lakeshore Met/No Change Driveway Setback A 15 foot driveway apron is required for front end loading garages. The existing garage used the right of way for a driveway apron as there is no space available for parking within the property boundaries. The proposed project meets the 15 foot driveway apron requirement. Section 78-330—Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT LR-1B Lot Area Lot Width Required 43,560 s.f. (1 acres) 140' Actual 16,292 s.f. (0.37 acres) 51' Section 78-1403—Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 16,292 s.f. (0.37 acres) Allowed: 3,258 s.f. (20%) Existing: 2,171 s.f. (13%) Proposed: 2,698 s.f. (16.5%) Section 78-1680 Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier 4,073 s.f. 3,144 s.f. 3,488 s.f. Tier 1 16,292 s.f. (25%) (19.2%) (21.4%) Applicable Regulations: Side and Street Setback Variances (78-330) The applicant is requesting variances from the street 30-foot setback and 7.5-foot side setback in order to construct a garage addition and deck walkway in line with the exiting home.The property is substandard to lot area and lot width creating a limited building envelope with the existing garage.The substandard width allows for a 7.5-foot side yard setback.The existing garage is set 2 feet into the ROW beyond the property boundaries and has an existing deck located 4 feet from the side property boundary. The proposed addition will improve the street and side setback from the existing conditions. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health,safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is • LA22-000045 September 19,2022 • Page 3 of 5 demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14,when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed variances are in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The small lot includes difficulties in its small size and width,and challenged by Elmwood Road which runs through the property. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variances to use the property for a single family dwelling with an attached garage and a deck are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The proposed project for a garage and deck addition on a substandard lot within the street and side yard setback appears to be reasonable due to the existing conditions of the home and the limited building envelope of the parcel. • b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The substandard lot area,width,location of the roadway bisecting the property within the LR-1B zoning district prevent a residential footprint consistent with the district.The applicant has designed the proposed addition to use the limited building envelope available on the property. and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance are requested in order to permit an addition to the existing home designed to fit the character of the neighborhood. The proposed project will improve the character of the area by removing an existing improvement from the roadway. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as single family home with a garage is an allowed use in the LR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such • property or immediately adjoining property. The property's substandard size and LA22-000045 September 19,2022 Page 4 of 5 orientation with respect to Elmwood Road, and adjacent properties creates difficulties which also apply to many of the properties in the same neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The property's substandard size and orientation with respect to the Elmwood Road creates difficulties which also apply to many of the properties in the same neighborhood. However the existing home location is unique to this property. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Granting setback variances are necessary for the preservation of the property rights of the applicant. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested side and street setback variances in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variances for street and side yard setback are necessary,and do not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant as the property has considerable practical difficulties affecting development. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Engineer Comments: 1. The proposal appears to remove and encroachment from the City ROW which is a benefit to the City. 2. The proposal moves the structure further way from Sanitary Lift station#20 which is a benefit to the City. 3. Demolition of the existing structure and construction of the new will require coordination with the Public works department to prevent damage to the nearby sanitary sewer system. Public Comments The applicant submitted letters of support from the abutting neighbors on the north and south of the property, attached as Exhibit F. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the side and street setback variance. • LA22-000045 September 19,2022 Page 5 of 5 • List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application and Narrative Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing& Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Neighbor Letters of support. Exhibit G. Site Photos Exhibit H. Plat Map and Mailing List 1110 PC Exhibit A s Land Use Application Summary LA22-000045 Application Date: 08/16/2022 • Address: 1153 Elmwood Avenue Orono,MN 55364 Parcel Number: 0711723140069 Land Use Number: LA22-000045 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: ROBERT HANNAH Address:EMMY ELLESTAD 1153 ELMWOOD AVE Name: Scott Johnson Applicant: Company:Addilay Homes&Remodeling,LLC Address:4130 St.Marks Dr Minnetonka,MN 55305- scott@addilayhomes.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Scott Johnson scott@addilayhomes.com Associated Contact:ROBERT HANNAH Associated Contact:Emmy Ellstad emmyrose29@gmail.com Associated Contact: S Project Description: Remove existing garage and home/garage addition Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application L Conditional Use Permit '_._; Site Plan Application Subdivision Application is Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application 19 Applicant Signature: • Project Narrative 1153 Elmwood Ave, Orono, MN 55364 PID: 0711723140069 The first and main goal of the project is to remove the existing detached garage that is currently constructed outside of the buildable area of the lot (as a part of the 1973 build). The existing garage is completely inside of the 30'front yard setback,with exception of the northeast corner,which was constructed outside of the property boarders. The new proposed front northeast corner of the garage will be 15.4'from the property boarder. This will create better access to the driveway on the north side of the property. This will also create a better parking situation for the proposed property. The second goal of this project is to have the garage attached to the house,so that the property owners have better access to their home in the winter months. The existing access on the south side of the garage creates difficulties during the winter. They would maintain access to the south side of the home via a new deck stairway on the proposed plans. The third goal of this project is to create additional living space and update the existing spaces with new finishes. The proposed addition does not exceed the hardcover requirements for the property. • SCOTT JOHNSON PRESIDENT ADDILAY HOMES & REMODELING; 612.386.4165 I scott@addilayhomes.com I www.addilayhomes.com ADDILAY 000 HOMES 5 FLEMODELINO • PC Exhibit B PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA22-000045 LA22-000045 1.The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response:The property owner desires to construct a new attached garage and addition, replacing a detached garage. The planned expansions outside of this area are not out of character with recent variances in the area. Removing the existing detached garage will improve the usability of the area, including access to the driveway to the home on the north. Moving this garage back from the right of way would be a positive impact on the neighborhood. 2.The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The existing conditions due to the location of the home and detached garage built in 1973 and not an issue created by the current homeowner. 3.The variance, if granted,will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: Many of the homes in the immediate area require some level of variance to improve the property due to the nonconforming lots.The new garage as proposed is 15.4' from the front yard property line on the northeast corner and the existing garage extends beyond the property line on the northeast corner. The proposed garage/addition appears to be consistent in scale with the homes on either side and enhances the character of the neighborhood. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy • systems.Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1163.06,Subd. 2,when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: N/A 6.The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A we are not requesting changing the permitted use. 7.The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two- family dwelling. Response: N/A 8.The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response:The lot area, lot width, and the garage?s proximity and orientation to the property line are special conditions unique to the Property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: The nonconforming location of the existing detached garage on the lot make the Property unique. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial I property right of the applicant. Response: Options for a conforming connection to the existing detached garage are limited on the property. The defined hardcover would be exceeded to attached the existing garage to the home. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety,comfort, morals, or in • any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: The proposed variance request will not pose any danger or harm to the neighborhood or community.. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: The lot width and area create practical difficulties affecting the Property. The setback variances for the garage are necessary and will not merely serve as a convenience to the Applicants. • 0 DETAIL A r PC Exhibit C ,_._,.y.... �--.--...-.........�. (4\10 LA22-000045 —,u,..r— — ""�r no n ' 5 .' h--D .. ... ......, .m. is -� \ ''s _ _� \ allitir ./ ; 1 _,.. 3 I rut / ` � _.. m un.. sm, I� v 4 y eee'J)eSE % v� . u \ 8, 1 {y �� I �K i _ '. .:�„--t- : al�` . �. g. gyP" u..vmm, .. 0 l ...r. \• ®',,, III IIS y,�y —,r` SURVEV LEGEND RRSSS111 v f l NEN sa wW see .� :oi '°.ruq r--` T� g a -i� t.r"rtL - - - \ ,r-','1., . i ' ,..'", ,.,;;.' r, \ ,; I w ,e "� I i `, `' 'I /, '';, .. ..® �..,m.m..... en.-41.m ra.r-.... _.... ----- ,... .... CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY .u�. Wm�•,yb -'• 8 d�'�t9� .. @ SATHRE-VBERGIMQ INC WUIST, . ORONO, PREPARED FOR. 1/ RY5-EFEa� N-.e.k� �' `Y.i•' MINNESOTA pDDII.AY HOMES 6 • F4 -, —r 4 9 f - d�� x I _4 Nq i"_*L �� II A ! \ „ v�A , `v A .v, \\ A l\ ,V l „A A\ I,\n �0 '4 \ r'� d ` \ `per � � I I 1.� 1�� r �i}}���\��: "' 'x'r-'n ,_\a-, �y"' -1`L -;tLEG ^"` Iw1 4 ' i*al yy END a gl a . aw - .. yo 9 .:. PIT im l � I pi ,. dq,i # fr I, I, ! , ,� 'ar � I —I I ,,/ _\ I r ) T. .. .. ..,. ...... mm. „�,m....,.n-..,..- s..e4.®.....s....,....m,®. �. mca�c`.w" CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY -- � is SATHRE-BERGQUIST,INC. ORONO, & P g PREPARED FOR: ,� ,,,,,,,,„d,,,,�,,,,a„, ...�.. ... �.w,.,., �qat w,ws. MINNESOTA ADDII.AY HOMES 0 0 PC Exhibit D w„,„„__,.,s_„a,.,,.,.,„,,w rb,ar LA22-000045 0„ cm >"sm T Q: 7. Aim ox Q , -- _ POI — ., s ■f -ram urr wm wrt arcEltectural L L.IN�EPS WAIVE eNmT ''''' d - ..- -- TcL-4-.7,.....-.7. DOWN WEFT,ELEVATION i 1 z FAST(FROND ELEVATION ICEZ Q < W8 r�' W ii u i i I I. .i .,..._........ ogre OF PUNS: �_.1... 7-29-22 SHEET NETT MEND ELEVATOR • • Dh ze o; ?- r ,.; _ _J� W Q I1 in a.a sort°a ex tea. 1 I 1—— _..._.` LME CAPES it fitATLI EA,E_P/ana. • a T 77"'"'1.1:6e';'''''::471r r P :.., �I , R11;I'i in J-n � -;+• o _ _....... . ))8 may' L cLi. of ... Cl) o. .4). °� �o.r,c -\,..- 1_, Y W ne , ra nr .r. DATE DF PUNS: Afi, .. -zs-zz SHEET ..LOPPANAASIDefV.SWT)FLOORFL*O 2 • . ee 0• ..4• [n.FH:t IF e) j l 'jLI'±-A--='Fr-1 1 1 ' 1 I It_ --I gaili \ 441" , t , 1 10,,,,,,,,,-,I r 1: .: [ , 000,1 1 I I 7-11 1 S4 : El .1 0"0.' 4 1 IL 1 1 il I 0 CS) c t__11_11_,_ / • 4 • —I 0 0010,..s.IFTSSF ,1, e 1 ..t :1/ : S 1 < IF.. ' - ''.. ' ..: 0 Igil i Ili ee.,6 Eta0F9 4. Ft: I 04,04.40,1 , ,, ..,:i MI= ': 1 -F VIIIIITINIff MI LINE&APES RI"'f Ir'IW I- _ — . architecturel . s n _I 1 ..........= r 1 n n I .737: ^.• = .... , Zirr'l IN:e 1.04.4 FLOOR 1.1-FT. 77:41tot.... 4:Tnc:TYFIrsTia . ..... ' " 44 ........n.*,w , cm TH 144,.....204... ,r_ A., ..-„, CI 2 i I'Mni } — , lig 0' ,b--Ilr i -12661 1 il i 6 4, \ IMM I=ii \ i, ----eFeo,..."'."." UP) L.J & /F t < 71 j ' .' '11,im LLI L 44 --I; 1 I _ - , • ki ' 1 1 t ' t 0 ml —,7=',0,-,....L, . ,,, ,..,. 1 1 mai ; SYSti •L____, i I. . TIN ri- - A -----k----- •-- -t- „,-4- .L. :472z..... LLI ,„,, , .2,.. 6 4,Ire i2,....Trpr 7-29-22 -lif;7 1 I -,:2.4z---- or OF PLANS , .... .ii...."F , OPFER(STREET LEVEL/FLOPS et... 3 0 • a� ! Illik 0 F^ v r •,m..m.sw exse•an. - m o IL IEo 4 „,.s.OTOL01X %.. H •152N�., K.,0ben „� a. STE PUN s OHM �� -- —= Q _ . 1 f 0 r_ s I}II . . • • • .' - L E L yl V_ - dal,a 6'041, xxrs ssm:r- j. it�! ,...—. �„ : i ! n' tel - O :sew ...... srr-^ ; ...... ._ m:a =: ^Zi... ...;as err LINESGAPES ff.r.'1m0aav60NL -.}mr.�.-SPOOL. -.}_ar,r.o.r.4 en76 .w.6 cs:a.ze , 0 ardirico e wigen ...AL°. R 1 1 I ' ,' ' f r it_,Q "Q Z, z 0 1 r . it . , c .z� I , , . l Cl)sea 56611135 w � a f1 I, W ,LNIbE] IKrrweil ® I-_ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1_ I e ti 1 Le j __� r r� - In 1, raaiuw # .I t_____ ORTE Cr FUNS: 11 I= =1 r'."'�•~ 7-29-22 G060 '-------J ♦ SHEET o 4 0 PC Exhibit E oNo City of Orono LA22-000045 Hardcover Calculation Worksheet (\,, ,__ `�% Property Address: 1153 Elmwood Avenue,Orono,MN 55364 III !,1'rESHQ�� Prepared By: Sathre-Bergquist Inc. Date: 7/27/2022 SB Job Number: 10058-017 Prepared By: JPM Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier:(Circle One) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1:PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table,identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property,keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form).Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain,as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property.For Tier 1 properties,identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total(Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A House 1,393 S.F. B Proposed Addition 1,095 S.F. C Existing Deck 210 S.F. D Pavers 578 S.F. E Retaining Wall 80 S.F. F Concrete 54 S.F. G Driveway Proposed 258 S.F. H Bituminous Public Road 930 S.F. I S.F. J S.F. K S.F. • L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1)Total Proposed Hardcover 4598 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): Retaining Wall 80 S.F. Deck(first 100 ft) 100 S.F. Bituminous Public Road 930 S.F. S.F. S.F. (2)Total Excludable Hardcover 1110 S.F. (3)Net Proposed Hardcover[Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 3488 S.F. (4)Total Lot Area 16292 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage[(3)+(4)] 21.41% % III This is an information packet regarding Hardcover.Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information con trained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. 1153 Elmwood Ave Addition Support PC Exhibit F 412) Ryan A. <ryanalness@yahoo.com> LA22-000045 9:29AM •Cott Johnson Hello We live at 1141 Elmwood Ave(Ryan and Stacy Alness)and support the proposed addition at 1153 Elmwood Ave(Bob Hannah and Emmy Ellestad). We support the proposed addition extending over the no build line'as the current garage extends well beyond the"no build line. The new addition would be a huge improvement to the neighborhood and will provide us a lot easier access for getting our vehicles in and out. It would also make easier for delivery trucks,postal carriers,etc to turn around at the end of Elmwood Ave. The proposed addition would bring uniformity to the neighborhood. Thanks, Ryan and Stacy Alness 952-452-0699 • • Ellestad's plans 0 Linda Spiten <laspiten@gmail.com> 7:32 PM (---, To:Scott Johnson Cc:Mike • Hi Scott, Mike and I have reviewed the remodeling plans for Emmie and Bob Ellestad's house on Elmwood Ave. We live next to them at 1161 Elmwood and are in full support of their plans. Please let us know if you need anything else from us. Thank you, Linda and Mike Spiten 507-259-3882 or 5070259-3881 S • • - ., .• - ' . .,',c. .'''"i''-'2"•''4'..#4. .V.7 74W!‘?4!-. ir-'• r•!.:;..,' A '::e 11*' ' .'. -47•..' 1' If ' r..i.','' .. h' ' G , ,' PC Ex !bit , . .t.,......::: „...._ ,,. , '06'14'.7 , ' ''g'''' ' .:' 1125 -. '.tr, 1121112i- ' .) . _Pr. If .f''' '.."?,' .41,Pc. ' 'VP'- • , '":" . •.t.' 1-4.. - A A I e• {1$7*' 4'4:',°,1 IP.'"t,r f.``',„, i .4'1.31111, , • . 1,,i37..i,,. ,-......4_,.. ;,..:: . „._. ..14. ti0-,„ -,,,.,: , .,,,....),''''-'*';',A.4. •."'i.:**''' , s Z.1 - . ti_.... - * .....1."„.,li,„:`*. ;,t.•- iltiir ,, , % "':' ..... ..1', „,k' ......„. , ... .- , ... , ,,,,,. ... :. 1-153 ,ti ,- ,...;.- ,. . .....--.:'. , . / ..,...t., . ..: = . . 7....., ... ..,-- k-' i!'" ...,,,,- • ' . ,,, ,.. , . , -• .. , ‘?..'.` .... .. ...: ........ - - ':::y. . . . t.... -,:-.,..-.- 1161 ' •,--.. - 4.. .'''...." -• +A'014, ,:", ,...„.4 . , -.L....,,,,;-........:,1 •,.., .. , m' ;=4' ''•;:, „...:. 141..„61,zt7- 4:: , ,i: Nib , „. ?".... ..,,. -7,, -- -..,..- - --, 1r ' , ,:: ,,- -c..- .. „ . . . . 1169_ '''' ''' ". * '''''''' 1/4 ''. '," r7i'',. • '`: .,4:... - ...I i. ..-:: ,;1179 . , , , . _ ' 41 `1, : _ `J..; • S au _ «`' City Utilities ♦ ` vi t fi sNa, t 141 + . r -r 1-, dye s xhr £� ^. r ,. 0,dy • ••., ‘,. .. _• F _ ..,i 'Ls way - dr t... .,•.. y . ��a.,' tr •` t em v jftt r=. 53p a. 114. >;L , . 153 • y �r .,y y x= ,,. 1111 , , ,,..., ;',.. t,- i. -4 .- ,,,,,,„..: . - ,, 4 iir '..-:-:',...i yd 10 4 ,.. /` ...it ( Ali "F.. t , , 1161, 4 t,. • Y j;r r'Y • • f•ta T1 y s j c x i ".ip *n o :44. } -*,:a .43•411".?..47***,!,,•;.; ', '''. '' t' '°';-- * ' f r. _, -......,,,,,,,...,A,- _. ,:.'" s < wr } r # * 1. i, fr� e�' :A $. • �`� .r.. �Y., y4�r. � .g •<. 4�'M.• .: lt5,tn iii., \\,, . R r rfL.1 4 �y r r ,'. �;; 4 w �4'yv • ## a w S .� ,. �a, a .4 I . • • x, t _ - } x .c r earrn per' - ,. # .. 'f: ,. ❑ Panorama < Thu Apr > �� t - rmap�INY[ UA •I '�',... )\a.-. .a r. »` r• :4.i„ i r T 4 . .^C, • • -Y 4 ka 3 fi t • ,' ... 7, .2 ., .... ,i,i ., . , ,, i , :s...174,-..,. . , .. .4.f.,, h,,, , , , 'fr./..:4-4 , ,.... ..,- . , 4..... .5.' 4. =--. 4 - t.- 4 4 ,, -, . $.7Vii„,- = - *it y 1 it`,* i 's` t 1 '..0 A iK S* s= -; A. 8 Ci tx ,4 1 . k d t r a S *leak s, 4 y4 4. f i i p w � it 1 ""•�''". +a a • z $'� . ,r_., lir pr • • .�• ' ./..%,;.,.,:t.,,''', ' 2 4, '''''''Zir'',f_r--• .4.' `. -.:1,0 ,� n or v / A G e...; ° tt 'rw'�. % r f05,14....4, S' 4, k .f f +,t" °A+.. 'Ace: a 1a? Y y x} v f 7 s F � f:. 1 3�s 'r M 3° � rn .vim 4 .� t � <• �.{E J:�'`d�k'rad. 3 d,^ +�u�.� i � LL r <^"RR.' of - 4 lik,.... J �� �. µ �. t. .. t„ '' 'sfit, a,� ,c+.-,� � I:; '' +. " r �^ ';,C s ^+".. •,+*fi'`rr � ' `i "5�S _ , x „'r..L? fifes.` a ry ry `- . ,}�'°` k , e 1, • �r:.... --':----� rr .0FM +rya' „�^' ..+.'ate. ^rsg v.� . am,, Y y r ` .Y 0 • i .a.n r r . a J' T , R° :a ~ ►• weti am it M ,. '•+ , _.„ TE�8 „ 2 "'pw+rd ,., 4 w - 4 I , *' nm▪ . " "` rye+ .� i c �. Ufa`•t9 `a- _ �1. v • ,�,"S y. ., Y `' ^../ at of¢, dp (k$si q #.1 `t7 ^+' S"a�.al tttg ,G` s#x'° vxR'r "';.. �� may a~ a1k'� ..���.. �' t 1 N{ ,F'Y 6 •K `�iF ., ice..>ay� J a° t i i wy#7 'r ,,liti' free,, n .416.5ro,..„,,,,,f,- ,,,,. .". ..,,..,,-,...4,,- ...x.-,4?,;.-. e ]\ �i ♦ �\ �� \ i ,,e .ri a tt a�d 1J 4r '...vfgJ ,�T♦ �4' '�� l'` 7�• ,+40, -• fi \ \ '�r� f -F. / "' a Y' . f,J�._ >/ ' . �i ,�Dr �. ,:..:,.., ..,,„, „_?,,.,4,, \ • s + F �yr � 5 a`Ja a ' y 1 • : v '� �'" �y �F � �a g�tl p� �� Rv� 'F' ,�i `.�"f . �y� �, � ��' k • 1 "iAi't'''.i.''..r'.:','.5.."'. r• ii P .'',K....4----.:-L.----,---,,-"-'--•i'.:,i'i.-t",*"n'-'—...,-_,,-....,-.,-.A--t.ilft,-7,.,r,-'-----, t 3 r Y l ` �j C .t 1•'1 '�F: 4 yw...�. ` S_ .c •�� , -..,�. _ - :1 "•••••_7_ .!I/44* •ie • y rp. ' _ > • r� x+rrs�'ira _ €td.a ? , ,a�<, �_ k,� ,61� •r �V: .: � s ,.� .M.F., ,.� _.^.r._`r t:. 5 . • .,,...,,,,,...,_,,„‘ \-: , ark u �y�v /" ; v S s . ,,,,. .,_,,,,.., :„.: ,,,,.„.,;. ,, , ,,,...„.,,,, ,....__, , _ h .'C s'-�, . • •_ to S •yk/ii1 F, .,. z a..••: . s Xas/ At, R " '. 4 • r /R +` .- a_ S /y-�"i i 6'st 1 t, •x 4e� a� K jr,�; ! �✓ .,,, ait i • G dl • q .a .fir, ''+ v a x f-, 3 "Ps': ,�• ti _ 5 t �'' ,,,. , w. "�.,„; 4.4,4,,o- •aT «,1,./.., _tt a t 4Y s A r �x' t >:'t� !� �� Y ,*# >�;ti" 4 g- .r � 4 t .- • a s,. . .'ap`t a ��} tx :�,._ • � h f �. � G � $7..�.• ;� r s w : t i 411 . ,e l s�P'!I �' _ t� >} 5^ 1,•y~' - , rt . r -ems • •._ ;' ' . . •-.. . _-•••F,...._ .;4.: , , .4*..,,,,,%0 41; .''i::..i:-. - I.{ y s w y sA ��' U[_.... .. 1 / i Allik___ s', .c �' w 4 !r+ Y *� 5'E rA, "24 `rt T :i k ' i:.4: t 3` f+... fir}f. - Y �C' *,>s*v`wr Y xi Wi` ,, ,. t .,. �, �A'Y,7 .. {. ti w� ,�-y � ram-# -'z • • '+C •e d , l 4 Y ; ram t� �yw f • 't , f '. R tF ap l� t/ r { .ram T l "9- ,'' 7 i- ,1' L„ R+ :"$ :1:,`r.ap, 44:a w'�d t --,i• ,vN yam. i''i�.-,- '+- ac �4.• .^s,,.,fir f, a �� w :L , 7� D...�'�L Asa # - X; • Ji rt K fi i <..: '., e s • i ,' *� '- 4 ' • �r t.' t T ` . n .a 5 b'* lj ,fin I i�`t>', g ro= J#poet S�� �L�s .r�' +. .*at3 e F t r r ,a. x ,�.• r rrr her d � : ,-...t.-1": ;- - ,- . _ ; .,,'1 Itzft4 ile _ .___ -- ‘--''-- --::::.7;z..- ..--.—. - . ..,:,_ ''''''' --. .,:: '''''' .-.47;77."4"4A '';-'..Vc."--••";,.''..,:!;:;,-5 -. •- ..:7:- A rl' ..'!'• *,.: ,•'E . '''', " :•-..., .,,,..., 7 itel A • , ..14,11zi.,,Te.,-... ..1.. .,,,,.. ,. ,,,.._0. ,,, .„. ..,-,, ,. ,,....,, .,., ,.:.,,t i 11 T gf S L � y,. � ray r -a Hcl r � s.1+. ." I i, y � a rt „.., .. . • .,,,,,,,t,,,,._„::,...,-1.,.:7,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,",,,,r,,-,-;,.,.,....,‘,.,%.;,,H,-:••,...,,:••,-,,,,,,4;,...,...,.....,.%,:.: ,„.„.,,,,.,:i.,,,i,.,*...-..,..?',,z'i:,,,,,,,'_,...„4.1.,„:',:,.:--:'\;-:_,-::„..::::: '''. iip:. X��. .rr.,_t w,•r. re'�r.r ,3rf 1t.....sr.< ..,?.*c; .« ..,.. ia� .,. �........, .__.�.._..._ ..c..,...,...,. • ,r s ,a .•j`n�• y: i wYTilr N� 1 hyta�P� 't `,� Al ,n 3 . 'l • tiairi\_Web• d4*- yy s �, • /,p 1.. -•N'4 : i �f' F ,,--4.44 ...-„..N.....„,....k",, ,,r t4 ',' . �s ^: ..�fn°ram" `Y: �\Y .a�Y e'! p- ...q r' , , • • .._,• `i �. r r w�. j, � a sY i t moo- gym " a t al ,a aeay it . • _ yg � • �.� 0,,.. : „....,_ t\ n fr ,,,' _ t Yres�44 • . ..,:.M ems' :a �S 4";-:,- -7,,r- '.- — .2' y ' ,y,,..,....,_ . o F•- . �z '',� t?.. a v .. �YR ` ix. ', r f ..,1• ty • 3p.,,. ,' .::: ... - r � r4.; �-'°'= `-.4 _- fir•~., r. - • • % �y. .L h k . •I i ,, • \ '.a, V } .�p .tt • a �a tr 1•, •fir \ r " lit a C # •:,a J \ \ ji. 40 0,,, ..,;: { \' "�+ �9 ♦ : "GX' S ft-Tr74:414.:17, f: Y..i '� -,..L.,c s.! .r T"�,, j! ;.. a _.,:,:*, 1 �/ . 1 , ' } i . �✓✓i a-. 1. nx x :' — i \ ',7:v.,„ ' -. 4 1, it i ...ilk , R.µs A4 • 1 _ ,' Y F s "j rl` k- `; -:- -,¢ -4 f #9;' 5- • u . y� -R'A yr` y tE'' F 9� � "� r�4- r ,Y = __,,, •. - v. NN • . ' I 0 • •, •". *0,:.•.' ' ' -' • .N1,' ' 1 V i; - v ,,4,4•;,',Iir , .4. ,., . .,.. . ,,k, , ..ti)i. i4, 'i.4;,,.:::.,..:,,;:-.---'`''' ..... .a r #lX . ' -14'4'. 1-', '•-#4..,-:‘,,--,.' 4#-- .-- p. .gy - ...- ••—�"' a r" ` . it: ..n ... yp' R . •{ -_tip. �. '. v J .tom A \ v 'ter:: •• `s ... '.. y _ '•, � a _ =x ` F . , ': . ,-7- z.- /- r ,, 7*: .w 0 • Date Application Received: 08/17/2022 Date Application Considered as Complete:08/17/2022 'W/�jO 60-Day Review Period Extension Expires: 10/16/2022 Y To: Chair McCutcheon and Planning Commission Members y ` Adam Edwards, City Administrator G1 tq'EsHO41‘' From: Melanie Curtis, Planner hIGG Date: 19 September 2022 Subject: #LA22-000043, Eskuche Design o/b/o Marcel Smits 3345 Fox Street Guest House CUP Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a guest house conditional use permit. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicant wishes to construct a new,971 square foot accessory building which will function as a guest house.The property is 4.6 acres in area within the LR-1A zoning district where 2.0 acres is the minimum • size.A conditional use permit (CUP) is required for the guest house use.A minimum of 4.0 acres is required for a guest house use in this district. Applicable Regulations: Guest House CUP (Section 78-303) The applicant is proposing to construct a new,four-bedroom guest house on the property. A guest house uses requires a conditional use permit.The guest house will be in a conforming location and meet all applicable zoning regulations. Applicable Regulation: Conditional Use Permit(Section 78-916) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted,the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: 1) Consistent with the community management plan;The proposed use is residential in nature and residential uses are consistent with the CMP guiding for this property. 2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; The proposed accessory building improvements including the guest house use are compliant with the zoning ordinance. 3) Adequately served by pplice,fire, roads,and stormwater management;The proposed use will be adequately served by existing services and facilities. 4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; The property is served by private septic and a private well.The applicant is aware that the septic system must be upsized at the time of building permit.They have provided plans for upsizing the system.This • criterion is met. FILE#LA22-000024 21 June 2022 Page 2 of 3 • 5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; This criterion is met. 6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; The proposed guest house is residential in character and its use is expected to be compatible with the surrounding area. 7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The guest house is residential in visual character and is expected to be compatible with the principal building on the property and the surrounding area. 8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The architectural styling of the guest house will be residential-looking in character and consistent with that of the principal building on the Property. 9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; The proposed use is not expected to have any adverse impacts. No information has been presented to indicate such. 10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; The views of the guest house from the neighbors will be screened by existing vegetation and the physical separation. In the opinion of staff,additional screening or buffering is not necessary. 11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise,glare,vibration,odors,fumes, dust, electrical interference,general unsightliness, or other means; The proposed guest house use is not expected to cause any of these undesirable impacts. • 12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties,traffic congestion, or unsafe access; It is anticipated that the proposed use will not generate any of these undesirable issues. 13) Designed to take into account the natural,scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; The guest house is designed to conform to the residence on the property,and will not have a negative environmental impact. 14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of- way or neighboring residential uses or districts; Applicant is hereby advised of this requirement; and 15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety,or general welfare.This criterion is met. The CUPs may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Further approval shall be granted only when the following criteria are met: 1. Regarding the guest house CUP,the lot is at least two times the minimum lot area required by this section; and 2. The guest house is for the sole use of the occupants of the principle dwelling, including their domestic employees and nonpaying guests. 3. The council finds that the proposed use of the pool cabana with a shower will not be detrimental to the residential character of the neighborhood. 4. The council finds that the plumbing fixtures proposed in the cabana are in keeping with the applicants' intended use of the accessory building. 5. The property owner agrees to the filing of a covenant in the title of the property providing that the accessory buildings will not be: FILE#LA22-000024 21 June 2022 • Page 3 of 3 a. Used for a home occupation unless specifically approved by the city or if allowed by this Code. b. Used as a dwelling unless a guest house conditional use permit is obtained. c. Rented, leased or otherwise provided for use as a dwelling under any circumstances. Additionally,the CUPs shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner as allowed by the Zoning Code? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the approval, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval conditioned upon the property owner's agreement to the filing of a covenant in the title of the property assuring that the guest house will not be used for a home occupation unless specifically approved by the city or if allowed by Code; and will not be rented, or leased under any circumstances. Staff recommends an additional condition of approval that the existing septic system be • upgraded appropriately to serve the additional bedrooms in the guest house. Further, Orono's Septic Manager recommends adding the following conditions: 1. Because the existing design is over three years old, prior to submittal of the septic permit,the designer should reexamine the design to assure the conditions have not changed; and 2. The applicant should provide a septic compliance inspection report with the design demonstrating that the system they are expanding currently meets compliance. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Existing Survey Exhibit C. Proposed Site Plan, Plans, and Elevations Exhibit D. Hardcover Calculations Exhibit E. Aerial View Exhibit F. Septic Information Exhibit G. Property Owners List Exhibit H. Plat Map • PC Exhibit A Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 08/17/2022 • Address: 3345 Fox ST Orono, MN 55356 Parcel Number: 0511723440007 Land Use Number: LA22-000046 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: MARCELLINUS HERMANUS M SMITS Address: 3345 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 Applicant: Name: Peter Eskuche Company: Eskuche Design Address: 18318 Mlnnetonka Blvd Deephaven,MN 55391 peter@eskuche.us Contact Information: Associated Contact: Peter Eskuche peter@eskuche.us Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: New Guest House Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application 4 /1 7 f � 1 t� f Applicant Signature: Vim") f • lft1-CL.-LS6 WA-6e.l S5[Lt rota "Iolosawln�ypaYj 5 wroN 95ESS NY1'3MY3 ONOI 3AIdC M011M NINON S>0 ,.I F/ , SMZNNY'Id 01.0I$NOASAONS CUM'611I14NFJNI'IIAIO jt-Ot-S " nHn 1 rotow.M bc 2-.. I ONI 'S3JvIOOSSV 02I3E[N0i0 l�aroad � '»T7� asxI�IAF;. . ,.. , 111 U. r Y / // o 0 ie - --_____ - TT , /i ' ' t �= ! I �' �Y/i '---- - _4__.' i asi% r i IIv p. v i 1r /P ,b /,f /,f l I / 1� f I ' / 1 / li-,,/ \,/ V / / i v I \\ 3rg r r l I / Q s ip d �� / \?i J r r I d i I . f 1 i I I\ i N - - - - , :i d 1'/ i i i ,Y /1` i \x / /\ s / // ,/ I - / \ \ ■ Iy A�� / // ;\/ / \ �% - , f III�'��N(�ja --- _. --`- ♦ / , t/ /�\\ ' 7...., /` �/ 1r 1 . � ' -, r1 � J' /` / S x ( �Pe /�r 11 tl& i F; - pw $ ; Ia _ 4 :rIttratuip 9 -- I/ ,1.1--'_=�==Y=A i -1--, II�' f 0 o s g •• r__.N(- '11 ,/ lam,I -...„1p__._, \I I \ 1 x Di Aar j �, L �I\ II tS • 1 , ,,, Cn R'�� W /� '�Y -� i ,/ ir i I/ [-t Av v$ / � R .,,,y ``ate ` a` _I O z W I . ; , / / y /r/ ; w v. vI v `v v `o�/ "'..I� Imo, [><, O'L --4- it ' /� 1 /Y w vv I v 1� e . -/$ I / g 'Y } / /�ll ,t1 k cn `, f\ c ' (,, aE I /41 1 % //[ / I IRC \� \ } �3.d "9 A ',1\ wg •. to 1._.1 .,.., " wV � / IJ \ _ xN �_ 4'f---1- i ar :'!/ :ii/ "I a I -, ha 1 i I$N I IA i T-=Lo i a 0.1 I/ I • y- -I-_1 � ; r i f /� / it\ I \ , / ft o T l/TI/ \ I \ '/ I//r/ 4\ \\ ./ / I I a\�{I61 ( 0114 - : \ 8j1t1' , : :lull- 7°11 •, \4, \11: . ; I1 n LV aI -.. :34)-- b*$ 'M� ' o —ram \I � a O� \ , h E-. d Y ,s.; it, ' 1 01 li x w w t J _ - egg. • Z c.) z m �� r ��II \ j / F d a 11.1011.1 OM,'t1101.3 ¢I.mm'wiMM9N3lNq .1:r .qy...n.obwc.n wup.Jtl�. .w.d. 'ONI%3IMOOSSV'8`Ja39N021fl 103rOad ° "'"" '" [ ...... ../::; • i- / ,uy f 1/ ' ,/, / ,I / l * 1 i 2 I/ 1 c . oil ...i 1 ir, / ' `sue .� S \ • .. , „, ,\, , ,. , , , ,, •,,, '101,4 I I 1 1 - .,____ _,, ,, \ ....... .,, \ , !, II - 3%'- 14,4001 7 • A jt, ,,.. „ 1 gt 1 I� /ram f ::::;%. 1 S e I,1,.:..', � En A loir•-••-li.r-i•rommillilwr011 N g §� iedgromPiiil i ! ,\ . • U) II)).- / par . y z i e w Sty1 Zr IPF. i \\'‘ ilig HLL r LL \ �' F�•' 43i0 N i O „.°� E k 5 12 "( 11 j m Ct o ..2, Z a' ELLA ,1 Irir--- -"--irmortiM/Ar/'.. 2 8 T --j I 6401114p"' f,/ , V. tic .1, ' i itti 1.0, - -'(��rit* g 2/�' 1. •• (II o h tD �g ~\1 /kis ..aw,..„4...._, --4 qd1 ,v qiko -4444E1 [2, 4. E f� '' coIli . I $ . a 1 --..—IN4,404,41,\T: i i illt. yak 1E 0 \ € E. R : iaa Z i' z E w g E 5 • III F. w D wM Z� I" o=o gi X Z O �� °o 0 LI 3; f Y; aU P3 Z ^ LL o uV nmn III 0 °3 - 1 a. r 4� 1 1 Z 3 w i 0 J J N- 1-4 i e �j W . d V . W Z ;=r Q , _, t — Cn Er u s • IllIRHI! o __ U Q W L�K YYS .Yf D - 1 Q D z Ili'{',f!{i 0' ° :r O c u ` w =+ - _ 1 . Jm5, - d� -r ���� ��N W �� _h o - J ,1 W III 9s -_ 0 -0 ri 1 0 Yr Ana i:jI u— w H III x' s_ 8. i ,11dr-.4-m-..-1ii-.,:2.:-r1-::N:- a_rI Ii i ,, '..�'.0,1." :114::1121:11C T , ..1.f.=.,•:. , .... . ,,i . 4111111.1 z01.t. ,_,,'. 3 i _ N r;... ; • Cs.:.,... ..2.•'.i Y/ I1LN�!— 1 i N 4.. ' , [Ili i i i i •9 b 9 j i IL gl j 14 14 I I -n r V, 1 �. .1.1:''. 11.11.oligil:.1.11 I aaltiL 1, :4' . ::111:61111111:11 ME Fnjl r ' �i= EP I "�� ;k;': a �III�J 9 I ®® I-,.112:11..� yz. w �17 . liii MIMI° 1 iii0il■tP1iii «IkMII a il i . ,, ,,:,.., „..,_ 0 ,„... .......,.,,,,, ..; ....� -: 4�a ,.I z ... _1 ,_ .......: _, IN '• 1rX4 s gl, = i ® . 0 tiw��. rNNE ism ®l , . 11. _ r -- LI Ia 1!l,I1 i::...5:::.-;'1: .41 or Mr :_': g. 'ESN _ 4rpxo — . :gt • .....• -2 i • PC Exhibit D • City of Orono �oNo Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 33 vs Fox .sr. (NENOEL Na,ti ) yf L' t-ftESMO�EL Prepared by: Date: CrACAlil 6R G V ASTOC IA rcr, ix/C. 5-3o -/9 08- I'7-22- Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one)(Tier 1) Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1. EXISTING HARDCOVER? i, rb iv -�C In the following table identity all ims of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Total Survey Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A /S 424.(f 373 B GARAGE y S.F. KE PoR(-lie ! 7 S.F. C LA 6/0 S.F. D j'Ar,n E pooL 2 372 S.F. g05 S.F. F 40GuER Per/G //o7rifB f STEEPS 103 9 S.F. G /oOZ it'aus'E 533 S.F. H PA VCR h A 1 v EGAAY 6002 S.F. I BL.4Ckrof ORrl'Eu1Ay 1533 S.F. J 660014.6(3 57"'EPS K J'TE'.aS 447' S S.F. GVALK$ Gt.vDi.vG y 0�[ S.F. • L // t/ S.F. M A/c ��[05 YO S.F. N GAft0 EN ,I. "14G...7Y-A WALcS /D'1 S.F. O St/,Rf TO LI/zF (0-7f'z ic) V3 S.F. P Trefitr to taMc (>7.r' 2° ir) Q R7t fr,i/L.vG W.(LCS 79/ S.F. R 10004 EaceiftiktE -r tI}ALL 28 S.F. S F1A E /1 T 2V 3 S.F. T G EA/FA.eTOL 10A0 S.F. 11 ,,,,pn /(A (StnPci-or -. �7 L S.F. ✓ Is�urP v i; W WI,Ili._ 5 Z S.F. X p l a ty a-r.- _ 25 S.F. Y Kv h'inn i.,,9 IAA iL5 Lii l S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover 20,4115'7 S.F. 22 /5 Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): ) LI l 6t A E*rif i Aiiii,c tAdA /-S 79/ S.F. f',hep,,,p(I Re ,,,, IAIGi114 _ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 7 -- S.F. 335 (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)1 ♦ ,-7-0-C S.F. _I LI 19 (4) Total Lot Area 2 03, SYS S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)j c�, 6 8 % /3-S 2 (Proposed Hardcover next page) 111 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8 of 9 »_' I,voOtg / I IN /i , S /� _ � _ir I •/ , ''' N , / :24401 I CO I I I I _ % I .1: 1/ fiNj V) I 11:'4V,., ''--.- 11 / n,/ 0- y 1 ' , \ 11 / \ � • ( � . 7c1 ) k I , 13 i!O ,d O 1 �� of 0 0- ..5-.% Lcioi Ake ''' 4%r • I 02 �� z 0 tiara-4 v .- 5 I \ \ ) 0 \ 1\ \\\ 4111141•11-7,...''711 If 3\, . • \ 4-\ \ '`J\n \ \, I r 6 �a1 1 0/ _, f7 ti .� \ °w - I \` 1```` d U pa ,� U oa 4,./ In W_ il os I I a \ o co N -41411111. . \ \ , a • z H la ��g �l�tUyl 0. W - .. • , '_T. Ott )Yx x µi Y ` "7' ,.. '" ll 1 V.'1144:;,„1-,,1.1,- 'x`` ��s o f `,,. r+sue s ,j w Ld • • ,ma, 4 {1� 4 tr* �r _ it � "Y ,,: , '^n ! ''f_ iT i- 1-q. .} L R3 !� � gam, q9�� • p ' e4 e xk Y "+2T" f ty o• . r r i v�l � 1 ` °'v .4 : -r T )1., ��"" te " ' -I P t,' ,, `" J 'rt ` �" sillyy -. ) -. 'yt , Ay-+.:T yr + - "`:7�'. irA..0..w4q, { , vii _ » 9 • .r'nc- sr L a 'i • '54 • sc -,01,-. . ' 4rai,''IV°•'.4 '111 I) ,,. Nit *••=-• TJ' 1 i ,"I,---I �+ _------ ——--- :I- I I .— _ / � r-so--- ....--- - —�-i—� -I ^I\ • dW I�� =-_ Za. 1 1 \ 1_, 95" — irk `l \ I I Y AO - ' 0 ,r i----I — -- � )c259 I 3 y' 1 / ,-, t - � I / /AI �� W6---- / �NzS / , I // ,,/ /.1 / /i / / I a �. , .\-J'! I U sL // 1 / / / _ )0 1 / <T' / / o.1- / / / / 7 -- 0 _.-_r._. , ,,.. ,,, / H Q. a I/Ca I /QP�P X1� I \ / /o I o _°iti �O /p i 1 1 f/ N<W `moo v I/// I / e) 1 // I . $ww 1 " / i a C /I oe r� / / / X II I `,z1 s3. , / i / / 1 1! / �zoN r ,j, // 1 i / / 4 // / z_`WWI 1,, 1 // I L4,/ // // //// 04 1 �� N 1 / r__L,00 oo, s // // /� o.... 7 A- /__ • 1N3W3sA, 3 ``f-_ 4 //!'} •. . / rt_ NNIV Q ., . //- / i • • • / 08 sil / \ • \ 1 . • ( I \ i • / I / ■ \\ I y • o I• / / / i € \ \ \ i 'I /I / / / I 6� \ \\ \9 �'p/ I /• /� /90— '— -996 Mb / ,\ rs EJ�I' A/ 1 / a \ / 96\ I p II 7 'iv 1 $i I Nio I I. K ac >1Z \>S f • \ -,:- .481Nitie ,..:,,,..teitti:% ....,...- -__ I (NI \1 �V I,i \ NSigv —ase_1 \ i N \ L�SS w � � � I \ a h >\s` �l \\ �,0 l\I tz % F/ i ac ``r' 7��► ° , . , tp 1 \ 1 jI4� \ �'` ,/ 6 • `���_ \q'I S N . of,C./ inw2 I 1,,,! \ t a•-. . .. I PC Exhibit G 38 05-117-23 41 0020 38 05-117-23 44 0007 TRUE VICTORY CHRISTIAN FLWSP SF REAL ESTATE LLC 0 525 LEAF ST C/O MARCEL SMITS LONG LAKE MN 55356 3345 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 41 0024 38 05-117-23 44 0008 CORNELIA D KLITZKE 3350 FOX STREET LLC 555 OXFORD RD 3350 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 41 0026 38 05-117-23 44 0009 MAXXR R MCCARTHY JR HUANG/WANG LIVING TRUST 686 FERNDALE RD W 3320 FOX ST WAYZATA MN 55391 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 41 0027 38 05-117-23 44 0010 SF REAL ESTATE LLC SF REAL ESTATE LLC 3345 FOX ST C/O MARCEL SMITS ORONO MN 55356 3345 FOX ST ORONO MN 55356 38 05-117-23 41 0028 38 05-117-23 44 0011 MICHAEL CLARK&MARCY CLARK KYLE DANIEL RUDOLPH 565 LEAF ST JORDAN MICHELLE RUDOLPH ORONO MN 55356 3280 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 • 38 05-117-23 41 0029 38 05-117-23 44 0012 KAREN K WAKE BECKER ET AL MALLORY MULLINS/MARTIN LUECK 575 OXFORD ROAD 3250 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 P O BOX 576 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 42 0001 38 05-117-23 44 0013 UNDIVIDED MALLORY MULLINS/MARTIN LUECK 3250 FOX ST PO BOX 576 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 43 0005 KEVIN GARNETT 13033 RIDGEDALE D#121 MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 05-117-23 44 0003 WILLIAM L TRUBECK 3300 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 0 38 05-117-23 44 0006 SF REAL ESTATE LLC 3345 FOX ST ORONO MN 55356 PC Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Exhibit H Date: 8/17/2022 • Bayside Rd J l e etonka as Boy '` it. #' • • Buffer Size: 500 0 100200 400 Feet Map Comments: I 3345 Fox St This data (i) C furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal, engneering or surveying • purposes.Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapdis,MN 55487/gis.info@hennepin.us • To: Chair McCutcheon and Planning Commission Members g-OO Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Laura Oakden, Community Development Director Date: September 19, 2022 4kESHORti Subject: #LA22-000048, City of Orono Text Amendment related to Accessory Building Height, Public Hearing Application Summary: The City of Orono is proposing an ordinance amendment which will modify the maximum permitted building height for accessory buildings in the Rural Residential Districts (RR-1A and RR-1B)to 30 feet. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the amendment as written. Background Currently the City Code limits maximum building height for accessory buildings to 30 feet defined height in each zoning district and states further that accessory buildings may not exceed height of principal building on the property.This restricts the accessory building height to the height of the house. This regulation is a challenge on properties with one-story ranch or rambler style homes.This is particularly challenging within the rural districts where outbuildings • and barns are desired. Recently,the City denied a land use application (LA22-000029), in which a variance was requested to permit construction of a pole building with a peak height of 17 feet where the house had a peak height of 16 feet. The planning commission and city council reviewed this application and identified this as a potential conflict between the rural district uses and urban standards.They directed staff to draft a text amendment to address maximum accessory building height limitations in the rural districts. The height limitations on accessory buildings in the other residential zoning districts would not change. Accessory buildings in all districts would still be required to meet all application zoning regulations including setbacks, hardcover, and sizing. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Are there any issues or concerns with this proposal? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the amendment as drafted. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Ordinance • PC Exhibit A LA22-000048 Sec.78-395.RR-1A district—Area,height,lot width,setback,and yard requirements. (a) The following minimum requirements shall be observed: Dimensional Requirements: Lot Area(Minimum):5.0 acre. Lot Width(Minimum):300 feet. Height:Maximum 30 feet defined height, Setbacks: Street/Front Interior Side Street Rear/Street OHWL* Wetland (feet) Side (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Principal Building 100 50 100 100 75/100/150 25 or +ALS MCWD buffer Accessory Building(AB) 100 20 100 20 75/100/150 25 or <1,000sf +ALS MCWD buffer Oversize Accessory 100 50 100 100 75/100/150 25 or Building(OAB) +ALS MCWD >1,000 sf buffer Accessory Structures(AS) 50 20 50 20 75/100/150 25 or +ALS MCWD buffer *OHWL setback is determined by the classification of the lake as defined in section 78-1217 and the applied minimum setback from the OHWL as outlined in section 78-1279. (b) Exceptions: (1) Side yards adjacent to unimproved rights-of-way.In any residential district,the setback for side yards adjacent to unimproved rights-of-way shall be the same as the applicable interior side yard setback. Unimproved in this section shall be interpreted to mean not improved or maintained by the city or county for vehicular travel. (2) Front yard setback.For lots that are non-conforming with respect to area the minimum front yard setback for the principal building,and accessory buildings less than 1,000 square feet,shall be equal to the average depth of the existing front yards on the adjacent lots on each side of the non-conforming lot fronting on the same street.However,the depth of such front yard shall not be less than ten feet. (Code 1984,§10.27(5);Ord.No.18 3rd series,§3,9-27-2004;Ord.No.173 3rd series,§8,6-27-2016;Ord.No. 222 3rd series,§15,12-10-2018) Sec.78-420.RR-1B district—Area,height,lot width,setback,and yard requirements. (a) The following minimum requirements shall be observed: Dimensional Requirements: Lot Area(Minimum):2.0 acre. Created: 2922-07-19 16:12.53[EST] (Supp.No.20,Update 2) Page 1 of 4 • Lot Width(Minimum):200 feet. Height:Maximum 30 feet defined height g. Setbacks: Street/Front Interior Side Street Rear/Street OHWL* Wetland (feet) Side (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Principal Building 50 30 30 50 75/100/150 25 or +ALS MCWD buffer Accessory Building(AB) 50 15 30 15 75/100/150 25 or <1,000sf +ALS MCWD buffer Oversize Accessory 50 30 30 50 75/100/150 25 or Building(OAB) +ALS MCWD >1,000 sf buffer Accessory Structures(AS) 25 15 15 15 75/100/150 25 or +ALS MCWD buffer *OHWL setback is determined by the classification of the lake as defined in section 78-1217 and the applied minimum setback from the OHWL as outlined in section 78-1279. (b) Exceptions: • (1) Side yard setback.For lots that are non-conforming as to their width,the interior side yard setback for the principal building,and accessory buildings less than 1,000 square feet,shall be the lessor of ten feet or equal to ten percent of the lot width as defined.However,in no case shall the side yard setback be less than ten feet. (2) Side yards adjacent to unimproved rights-of-way.In any residential district,the setback for side yards adjacent to unimproved rights-of-way shall be the same as the applicable interior side yard setback. Unimproved in this section shall be interpreted to mean not improved or maintained by the city or county for vehicular travel. (3) Front yard setback.For lots that are non-conforming with respect to area the minimum front yard setback for the principal building,and accessory buildings less than 1,000 square feet,shall be equal to the average depth of the existing front yards on the adjacent lots on each side of the non-conforming lot fronting on the same street.However,the depth of such front yard shall not be less than ten feet. (Code 1984,§10.28(5);Ord.No.18 3rd series,§3,9-27-2004;Ord.No.173 3rd series,§9,6-27-2016;Ord.No. 199 3rd series,§5,6-12-2017;Ord.No.222 3rd series,§17,12-10-2018) Sec.78-1434.Building size restrictions. No accessory building shall exceed 1,000 square feet of footprint area;except that accessory buildings in excess of 1,000 square feet shall be considered oversized and will be allowed under the following conditions: (1) Not more than one oversized accessory building(OAB)shall be permitted on any property.An OAB is defined as an accessory building of footprint area in excess of 1,000 square feet. (2) An OAB is regulated by the following table: Created: 2022-07-16 16:12:53[EST] (Supp.No.20,Update 2) Page 2 of 4 • • Lot Area(acres) Maximum Allowed Cumulative Total of All Accessory Building Footprint Areas on a Property(square feet) 0-1.99 2,000 2.00-3.00 2,400 3.01-3.50 2,800 3.51-4.00 3,200 4.01-4.50 3,600 4.51-5.00 4,000 5.01-6.00 4,400 6.01-7.00 4,800 7.01-8.00 5,200 8.01-9.00 5,600 9.01-10.00 6,000 10.01-11.00 6,400 11.01-12.00 6,800 12.01-13.00 7,000 13.01-14.00 8,000 14.01 or more 1.30%of lot area (3) Any OAB shall be subject to the following conditions: • a. Principal building setbacks must be met.Further,no OAB shall be nearer the front lot line than the front line of the principal building on the property. b. The maximum height for such accessory building shall be 30 feet or the defined height of the principal residence building on the property,whichever is less. 1. Exception:Within the RR-1A and RR-1B districts the OAB may exceed the height of the Formatted:Numbered+Level:1 +Numbering Style: principal building,and is limited to a maximum of 30 feet defined height. 1,2,3,...+Start at 1 +Alignment Left+Aligned at c. An OAB shall be allowed only when the property owner agrees and covenants in writing with the 0.91"+Indent at 1.16" city as follows: 1. No future subdivision will be approved that places the OAB within a lot that has no principal building,except that the city in its subdivision approval may grant a finite time period in which the OAB may remain without a principal building,in order that a principal building may be constructed.At the end of this time period,the OAB must be removed if no principal building has been constructed. 2. If the property is subdivided,the OAB and principal building will be located together within a lot that meets the minimum lot area requirement for the given size of the OAB. 3. In subdivision approval,the setback required for the OAB shall remain. Such covenant shall be binding on current and future property owners and shall be filed in the chain of title of the property. (Code 1984,§10.03(9)(C);Ord.No.106 3rd series,§24,6-10-2013;Ord.No.222 3rd series,§27,12-10-2018;Ord. No.232 3rd series,§1,10-14-2019) Created: 2022-07-19 16:13:02[EST] (Supp.No.20,Update 2) Page 3 of 4 • Created:2022-07-19 16:13:02[EST] (Supp.No.20,Update 2) Page 4 of 4 •