Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-27-2022 Council PacketAgenda Council Meeting Monday, June 27, 2022 6:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us The public is invited to address the council regarding any item on the regular agenda. If your topic is not on the agenda, you may speak during the Public Comments section. Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Agenda Consent Agenda 1. City Council Meeting Minutes of June 13, 2022 2. Claims/Bills 3. Annual Appointment Amendment - Addition of Budget Committee – Resolution No. 7274 4. Approval to Hire Full Time Officer Presentation 5. Hennepin County Commissioner Chris LaTondresse Public Hearing 6. Annual Public Hearing for MS4 Storm Water Permit Zoning Report 7. LA22-000028, Peter Eskuche with Eskuche Design, 2605 North Shore Drive, Variances – Resolution No. 7272 8. LA22-000017, Jon Ressler and Frank Plachecki, 3683 North Shore Drive and 3685 North Shore Drive, Lot Width Variance for both properties 9. Navarre Parking Lot (Project #21-040) Public Comments – (Limit 3 Minutes per Person) This is an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. The council will not engage in discussion or take action on items presented at this time. However, the council may refer issues to staff for follow up or consideration at a future meeting. Speakers should state their name and home address at the podium before speaking. Finance Report Community Development Report 10. 1354 Rest Point Cir, Dennis Walsh, Emergency Slope Failure – Resolution No. 7273 City Attorney Report City Administrator/Engineer Report Agenda Council Meeting Monday, June 27, 2022 6:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us Mayor/Council Report Closed Session 11. The meeting will be closed as permitted by section 13D.05, Subdivision 3(c), to consider an offer to purchase City owned property identified as PID: 3411823320050 Adjournment Upcoming Events 2022 07-04-2022 Official Holiday, City Offices Closed 07-05-2022 Park Commission Work Session, Tuesday, 6:00 p.m. 07-11-2022 City Council Work Session, Monday, 5:00 p.m. 07-11-2022 City Council Meeting, Monday, 6:00 p.m. 07-18-2022 Planning Commission Meeting, Monday, 6:00 p.m. (Dennis Walsh) 07-25-2022 City Council Work Session, Monday, 5:00 p.m. 07-25-2022 City Council Meeting, Monday, 6:00 p.m. 08-01-2022 Park Commission Work Session, Monday, 6:00 p.m. 08-08-2022 City Council Work Session, Monday, 6:00 p.m. 08-09-2022 Primary Election, Tuesday, 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. 08-15-2022 Planning Commission Meeting, Monday, 6:00 p.m. (Richard F. Crosby II) 08-22-2022 City Council Work Session, Monday, 6:00 p.m. 08-22-2022 City Council Meeting, Monday, 6:00 p.m. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, June 13, 2022 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 6 ROLL CALL The Orono City Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: City Council Members Aaron Printup, Richard Crosby III, Victoria Seals, and Matt Johnson; Mayor Dennis Walsh was absent. Representing Staff were City Attorney Soren Mattick, City Administrator/Engineer Adam Edwards, Public Works Superintendent David Goman, Finance Director Ron Olson, Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart, Parks and Golf Course Superintendent Joshua Lemons. Printup called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA Printup noted they would remove item 20, LA22-000022 and put it on the regular Agenda. 1. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 23, 2022 2. CLAIMS/BILLS 3. APPROVAL OF FIRE WORKS DISPLAY PERMIT – 880 PARTENWOOD ROAD 4. APPROVAL OF TRANSIENT MERCHANT LICENSE – RENAISSANCE FIREWORKS INC. 5. APPROVAL OF RENTAL LICENSES 6. APPOINTMENT 2022 ELECTION JUDGES – RESOLUTION NO. 7268 7. APPOINTMENT OF 2022 PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTION ABSENTEE BALLOT BOARD– RESOLUTION NO. 7271 8. APPOINTMENT OF SEASONAL EMPLOYEES 9. APPROVAL TO DISPOSE OF BICYCLES 10. APPROVAL TO DISPOSE OF FIREARMS 11. APPROVAL TO DISPOSE OF UNCLAIMED PROPERTY 12. AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE PATROL RIFLES 13. APPROVAL OF FOX STREET PRELIMINARY PLANNING AND ENGINEERING (PROJECT #23-001) 14. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT- DIAMOND LAKE REGIONAL TRAIL – RESOLUTION NO. 7269 15. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR RESIGNATION / RECRUITMENT PROCESS 16. INTERIM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR – APPOINTMENT MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, June 13, 2022 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 6 17. APPOINTMENT OF FULL TIME MAINTENANCE WORKER & MAINTENANCE WORKER RESIGNATION / RECRUITMENT PROCESS 18. LA22-000018 – CITY OF ORONO TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO NON- ENCROACHMENTS AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS – ORDINANCE NO. 272, THIRD SERIES 19. LA22-000019 – CITY OF ORONO TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO DOCK IN THE RS ZONING DISTRICT – ORDINANCE NO. 273, THIRD SERIES 20. LA22-000022 – CITY OF ORONO TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO DEAD AND DISEASED TREES – ORDINANCE NO. 274, THIRD SERIES This item was removed from the Consent Agenda and moved to the Community Development Report. 21. SEPTIC SERVICES CONTRACT AGREEMENT 22. APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE 2022 FEE SCHEDULE – ORDINANCE NO. 271, THIRD SERIES Crosby moved, Seals seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. FIRE DEPARTMENT REPORT 23. PURCHASE OF FIRE EQUIPMENT Printup noted this item will be removed from the Agenda and brought back at a future date as the Fire Department was not able to be present this evening. Crosby moved, Seals seconded, to table the item until a future date. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS Robert Manson, 6740 Clearwater Creek Drive, Lino Lakes, has been Attorney for Brad Erickson for over 20 years. He stated many Council Members are aware of Mr. Erickson’s concerns and Mr. Manson is hopeful to get those resolved, perhaps by meeting with members of the City Council prior to the next meeting. If not, he will come back at that point in time. Timothy M. Hultmann, 280 Lake View Avenue, Long Lake, is almost a 44 year resident of Long Lake and is a former member of the Long Lake Planning Commission, EDA Board, member of the City Council, and former Mayor. He has been following the ongoing saga of Mayor Walsh’s determined effort to take control of the Long Lake Fire Department. Regarding the residents and businesses serviced by the Long Lake Fire Department fire fighters, Mr. Hultmann would like Mayor Walsh to put ego aside and accept the offer from Long Lake in purchasing Station 1 at Willow Drive in Orono. To quote a former Excelsior resident speaking to Mick Jagger 50-some years ago: you can’t always get what you want. PRESENTATION MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, June 13, 2022 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 6 FINANCE DIRECTOR REPORT Finance Director Olson shared a slide showing monthly building revenue permits, noting May 2022 was a bit behind May 2021 but they are up to 38.2% of the budget. He said if it stays where it is now they will probably be just fine by the end of the year. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT 20. LA22-000022 – CITY OF ORONO TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO DEAD AND DISEASED TREES – ORDINANCE NO. 274, THIRD SERIES Community Development Director Barnhart shared in May the Planning Commission reviewed a text amendment related to dead, diseased, and hazardous trees. There is a requirement to replace live trees in the shoreland area and there is no real requirement to replace dead trees. There is also no consideration to hazardous trees or trees that may fall down onto another property causing damage or injury, or diseased trees that may spread their diseases in the neighborhood. This draft ordinance is intended to provide some guidance to these things. The Planning Commission recommended that trees should be replaced one-to- one (one tree removed, one tree added) to continue to establish foliage and vegetation in the shoreline. Planning Commission recommended approval of the change. Jay Nygard, 1386 Rest Point Road, approached the podium and noted he gave public input at the Planning Commission meeting because he went through a process where the City wanted him to put 8 trees of a certain size in a certain area to replace a tree he took down for a boathouse the tree was wrecking. He negotiated with the City as he did not want a wall of trees and found reasonable places to put trees so it worked out. Mr. Nygard noted it may have gone too far here in saying that any tree of any size; he thinks they still need to have some requirements as there will be someone saying a sapling is a tree, it is a size, and it will work. He thinks the ordinance still needs a little tweaking and believes the Comprehensive Plan says something about maintaining the trees around the lake to make sure the foliage does not go away. Mr. Nygard noted a neighbor chose to cut a tree down and had his arborist “claim” that it was severely diseased. Mr. Nygard took the stump and it was clearly not diseased severely. If someone claims “the arborist said this” it is just like anything else, trees are important to the lake, an inspector needs to be sent out to look at the tree, they need an inspector, a permit in advance, and to follow the process. He thinks there should be a penalty for taking trees down without contacting the City first and they need to find a reasonable middle ground as the previous ordinance was too onerous and this one swings a little too far to the other side. Barnhart noted Mr. Nygard raised an important point and in regards to his boathouse tree, it could be deemed hazardous or diseased, but previously it was “alive” so it fell into items 1-3 in terms of replacement size. Based on this ordinance if a tree is hazardous or dangerous the City can allow that removal to occur and then the homeowner just needs to replace 1 or 2 trees, whatever the Council wants to add. This draft ordinance allows a property owner to remove a diseased or hazardous tree as long as they replace it. Barnhart noted there is not an arborist on Staff so they look for those with expertise to tell the City whether a tree is diseased and this ordinance is intended to help people with situations like Mr. Nygard. Mr. Nygard bets an arborist would be more than happy to work for the City of Orono on a set fee-per- visit. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, June 13, 2022 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 6 The City Council and Barnhart discussed the item including hazardous trees, amount of trees to be replaced, other cities’ Codes on trees, one-for-one tree replacement, penalties, and consideration for trees blown over during storms. Seals suggested if someone is touching a tree, whether dead or alive, a tree permit should be required across the board. Barnhart stated the City Attorney could draft something. Crosby does not think the City needs it for a dead tree. Johnson noted there are also property rights and if there is a dead tree on someone’s property one should not have to call the City and get their permission to take down the dead tree. He thinks they are getting a little deep in the philosophical concern about the City not having a lot of power when people are taking advantage and taking down trees. Johnson moved, Crosby seconded, to approve LA22-000022 – City of Orono text amendment related to dead and diseased trees – Ordinance No. 274, third series, as written. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 1 (Seals). PARKS AND GOLF COURSE REPORT 24. ORONO PUBLIC GOLF COURSE KITCHEN UPDATES Golf Course Superintendent Lemons stated the Park Commission has requested the City look at a kitchen update at the golf course. Over the past year and a half they have been looking at how to improve the kitchen to get architectural drawings and proposals to move forward with those designs. They have two proposals from Oertel Architects ($9,080) and JDD Studio ($6,600); Staff is recommending JDD Studio’s proposal. Seals stated it is a very small and limited kitchen right now and because the golf course has been pretty popular and paying for itself, reinvesting money into it is a good idea. Printup thinks it will pay for itself in future years with more use of the golf course and kitchen. Johnson moved, Crosby seconded, to approve Orono Public Golf Course kitchen updates and signing a contract with JDD Studio. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Lemons shared a general Parks update sharing a slide on golf course revenue. He noted they had a terrible April due to weather with only four decent golf days as the average temperature was 40 degrees. In May and June they have been moving very strong and are sitting about 11% behind where they were the previous year. They have really increased on concessions and alcohol sales and are ahead of the previous year in that area. Rounds played are slightly down but season pass rounds are up and they are selling more season passes, as well as junior rounds. Lemons noted they will have some Junior PGA tournaments in June and July and it is another busy year for golf. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, June 13, 2022 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 5 of 6 Attorney Mattick had nothing to report. CITY ADMINISTRATOR/ENGINEER REPORT Edwards updated the City Council, noting they had a pre-construction conference for roads this year and road projects are set to begin on July 5 with an expected completion date of September 5. The vast majority of roads are mill-and-overlay which are fairly quick with minor disruptions to residents. Edwards also acknowledged Mr. Barnhart for seven years of service as the Community Development Director. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Seals noted it has been on the docket to look at a Fire Consultant/Chief and some work has been done. After discussing with the Mayor, he thought it would be good to punt it over to the Re-organization Committee. Edwards asked for direction at this point as anything that needs approval will come back to the City Council. The City Council shared their support for the direction to direct the Re-organization Committee to look at it. Seals stated they are coming up on budget season and the Council tries to jam much of that into work sessions and do not get through all of it. The Mayor thought it would be a good idea to create a budget committee to allow more time to dive into those line items before City Council approval. Edwards would bring to the City Council’s next meeting an amendment to the standing committee list and formal approval would be at that meeting. The City Council shared their support for the suggestion. Seals said the City Council received a letter earlier in the day from the City of Long Lake in response to the City of Orono’s letter. Being married to a fireman she received the letter earlier in the weekend and has thought about it a lot, talked to other firemen, talked to the Mayor of Long Lake, and she does not think the negotiations need to stop. After talking to Long Lake Mayor Miner today she thinks there is misalignment in communication and an opportunity to sit down with Long Lake staff to look at what the two cities can agree upon. Seals thinks they all owe it to themselves and residents to chill out for a moment and have a sit down and that both cities can do better regarding communication. She thinks there is some middle ground that they just have not found yet and this is not in the best interest of the firefighters, either, as they do not know where they are going. The majority of the firemen and firewomen are Orono residents which puts them in an odd situation. There is a reason Station 1 is built in Orono and much of this is short-sighted for the City to act and not try to sit down with Long Lake, pause for a second, and try to figure it out. She does not think any of the fire people think Orono or Long Lake are great right now. Crosby stated the thing to understand is that this is a business decision. There has been a lot of rhetoric thinking it is about their performance or the way the fire department has done something and that is not MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, June 13, 2022 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 6 of 6 the case. It is a math decision – if Orono pays 85% of the bill, they are going to have their name on the door. Crosby would not vote for Long Lake to buy Station 1 in Orono. As stewards of taxpayer dollars, how do they spend 85% of the money for a fire department and have no say? He respects the history and he was part of that history at Long Lake Fire. Cosby stated they need cohesiveness within that fire department and it is not a performance thing, it is a dollars and cents thing. He shared that he and his wife renewed their vows the previous week and are celebrating 30 years of marriage on the 16th of the month. Johnson is not opposed to Long Lake deciding to have their own smaller fire department. He is not going to close the door to any concept including selling the building over there. The City Council’s goal and responsibility is to have the best fire service for Orono residents; he noted they all hope it includes Long Lake. Seals thinks there is probably a better end-point and would like to talk with Long Lake. Johnson noted they cannot piecemeal everything. What Orono asked for was to get their own appraisal and for Long Lake to also get an appraisal. He thinks Orono needs to develop a plan for communication as he would like to get rolling. He hopes Orono is covering Long Lake and “Long Lake Fire” is still on those trucks while having a different level of influence over the budget and management to use Orono’s size, scope, and police to be more efficient than it is right now with centralized communication. This would also bring costs down. He noted it is not that complicated but it is about sitting down and figuring it out to make decisions. He congratulated Community Development Director Barnhart. Printup said there is history, people love the fire department, and it becomes an emotional issue with heels being dug in which is normal. He agrees they need to be able to talk with the facts and that in the future costs could come down. ADJOURNMENT Johnson moved, Seals seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 6:51 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. ATTEST: _____________________________________ _______________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: Ck Reviewed By: RJO Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve payment of claims made on the City for services and/or products provided to the City. 2. Background. The attached claims for payment have been received by the City. Staff has reviewed the claims and is recommending approval of the listing for payment. The claims will be paid by checks 118887 to118965 and ACH transactions 20130265 to 20130266, totaling $300,891.74. 3. Noteworthy Payments. Vendor Amount Description of Payment #118922 Dock & Lift $3,800.00 Big Island Public Dock #118954 Quality Flow System $34,140.00 Rehab on Grinding Stations #3, #4, and #5. #118957 Shaughnessy Lawn $7,442.00 Mowing Contract for Parks. 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of a motion authorizing payment to the claims list as presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the claims list as presented. Exhibits A. Check Register Item No.: 2 Date: June 27, 2022 Item Description: Claims/Bills Presenter: Ron Olson Finance Director Agenda Section: Consent Agenda City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 6/14/2022 - 6/27/2022 Jun 23, 2022 03:06PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 06/17/2022 118887 11M7-7YLX-101-43000-240 SHOP SUPPLIES Public Works Department 67.06 Total 118887:67.06 BARNUM GATE SERVICES INC 06/17/2022 118888 32862 101-42110-404 GATE REPAIR AT BRUSH SITE Police Department 213.70 Total 118888:213.70 BRIAN CLARK 06/17/2022 118889 2022.06 BO 101-43000-226 WORK BOOTS Public Works Department 250.00 Total 118889:250.00 CENTRAL PENSION FUND SOU 06/17/2022 118890 CFP061622 101-21705 LOCAL UNION #49 5/30/22-6/12/22 802.50 Total 118890:802.50 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC 06/17/2022 118891 9061688 101-43000-221 DRILL BITES FOR UNIT 481 REPAIRS Public Works Department 14.94 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC 06/17/2022 118891 9061688 101-43000-221 SHOP SUPPLIES Public Works Department 263.07 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC 06/17/2022 118891 9061688 101-45200-223 PARKS SUPPLIES Parks 172.79 Total 118891:450.80 International Union Local #49 06/17/2022 118892 LOCAL49061 101-21707 LOCAL 49 DUES - 06/2022 350.00 Total 118892:350.00 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR S 06/17/2022 118893 LAW ENFOR 101-21707 LELS DUES - LOCAL 40 06/2022 1,318.08 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR S 06/17/2022 118893 LAW ENFOR 101-21707 LELS DUES - LOCAL 168 06/2022 260.00 Total 118893:1,578.08 NAVARRE HARDWARE 06/17/2022 118894 337538 101-45200-223 KEY RING Parks 4.79 Total 118894:4.79 OPD BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LL 06/17/2022 118895 2407780990 101-42110-201 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES Police Department 73.89 Total 118895:73.89 OPEIU - LOCAL 12 06/17/2022 118896 LOCAL12061 101-21707 UNION DUES - LOCAL 12 6/2022 741.50 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 2 Check Issue Dates: 6/14/2022 - 6/27/2022 Jun 23, 2022 03:06PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 118896:741.50 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 06/17/2022 118897 SUNLIFEST0 101-21714 STD- JULY/2022 900.80 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 06/17/2022 118897 SUNLIFESU 101-21710 LIFE INS- JULY/2022 1,405.74 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 06/17/2022 118897 SUNLIFESU 101-15998 LIFE INS-COBRA- JULY/2022 31.86 Total 118897:2,338.40 THE HARTFORD 06/17/2022 118898 HARTFORD0 101-21713 LTD JULY/2022 1,734.72 Total 118898:1,734.72 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/17/2022 118899 9908180178 101-41900-321 VERIZON BILL 05/07/2022-06/06/2022 Central Services 216.30 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/17/2022 118899 9908180178 101-42110-321 VERIZON BILL 05/07/2022-06/06/2022 Police Department 1,695.64 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/17/2022 118899 9908180178 101-42400-321 VERIZON BILL 05/07/2022-06/06/2022 Building & Zoning 187.49 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/17/2022 118899 9908180178 101-43000-321 VERIZON BILL 05/07/2022-06/06/2022 Public Works Department 250.07 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/17/2022 118899 9908180178 101-43100-321 VERIZON BILL 05/07/2022-06/06/2022 Brush Site 75.02 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/17/2022 118899 9908180178 101-45200-321 VERIZON BILL 05/07/2022-06/06/2022 Parks 80.03 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/17/2022 118899 9908180178 101-45210-321 VERIZON BILL 05/07/2022-06/06/2022 Golf Course 115.04 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/17/2022 118899 9908180178 601-49400-321 VERIZON BILL 05/07/2022-06/06/2022 Water 266.25 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/17/2022 118899 9908180178 602-49450-321 VERIZON BILL 05/07/2022-06/06/2022 Sewer 110.03 Total 118899:2,995.87 Yamaha Golf & Utility 06/17/2022 118900 01-234681 101-45210-403 GOLF CART REPAIR Golf Course 34.92 Yamaha Golf & Utility 06/17/2022 118900 01-242357 101-45210-415 CART LEASE Golf Course 80.35 Yamaha Golf & Utility 06/17/2022 118900 01-243040 101-45210-403 GOLF CART REPAIR Golf Course 576.58 Yamaha Golf & Utility 06/17/2022 118900 01-244086 101-45210-415 CART LEASE Golf Course 1,740.11 Total 118900:2,431.96 ADVANCED FIRST AID INC 06/27/2022 118901 0622-362 101-42110-221 MED SUPPLIES Police Department 853.00 Total 118901:853.00 APACHE GROUP 06/27/2022 118902 222470 101-41900-201 PAPER TOWELS Central Services 993.60 Total 118902:993.60 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 3 Check Issue Dates: 6/14/2022 - 6/27/2022 Jun 23, 2022 03:06PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount ASPEN EQUIPMENT 06/27/2022 118903 10238813 701-49800-221 UNIT 425 PARTS ADOMATIC CHAINS 152.11 Total 118903:152.11 Aspen Mills 06/27/2022 118904 295525 101-42110-226 UNIFORM HAT - SLIPKA Police Department 26.35 Aspen Mills 06/27/2022 118904 295708 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS Police Department 88.76 Total 118904:115.11 Awards by Cindy LLC 06/27/2022 118905 5183 101-45200-223 NEW PLAQUE/NAMES PLATES Parks 83.76 Total 118905:83.76 Belson Outdoors 06/27/2022 118906 200602 225-45200-580 PICNIC TABLES FOR BIG ISLAND 2,977.88 Total 118906:2,977.88 BERMEL, TOM 06/27/2022 118907 2022.06 BER 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - D21-24 135 ORONO ORCHA 1,000.00 Total 118907:1,000.00 BIFFS INC 06/27/2022 118908 W867283 101-45200-415 BIFF RENTAL Parks 166.00 BIFFS INC 06/27/2022 118908 W867284 101-45200-415 BIFF RENTAL Parks 166.00 BIFFS INC 06/27/2022 118908 W867285 101-45200-415 BIFF RENTAL Parks 182.00 BIFFS INC 06/27/2022 118908 W867286 101-45200-415 BIFF RENTAL Parks 91.00 BIFFS INC 06/27/2022 118908 W867288 101-45200-415 BIFF RENTAL Parks 166.00 BIFFS INC 06/27/2022 118908 W867289 101-45200-415 BIFF RENTAL Parks 91.00 BIFFS INC 06/27/2022 118908 W867290 101-45200-415 BIFF RENTAL Parks 91.00 BIFFS INC 06/27/2022 118908 W867291 101-45200-415 BIFF RENTAL Parks 91.00 BIFFS INC 06/27/2022 118908 W867292 101-45200-415 BIFF RENTAL Parks 91.00 Total 118908:1,135.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.06/27/2022 118909 0287188 101-43280-304 LA22-000006 TANAGER CREEK Special Services 456.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.06/27/2022 118909 0290664 601-16500 22-023 WATERMAIN REPLACEMENT (CSAH 19)23,733.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.06/27/2022 118909 0290665 101-43280-304 LA21--000022 LONG BRIDGE Special Services 304.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.06/27/2022 118909 0290666 101-43280-304 LA20-000048 SHORELINE ESTATES Special Services 228.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.06/27/2022 118909 0290667 101-43280-304 LA21-000014 ORONO CROSSING Special Services 2,293.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.06/27/2022 118909 0290668 101-43280-304 LA20-000030 ORCHARD CREEK Special Services 228.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.06/27/2022 118909 0290669 101-43280-304 LA15-3723 LAKEVIEW Special Services 1,175.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 4 Check Issue Dates: 6/14/2022 - 6/27/2022 Jun 23, 2022 03:06PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount BOLTON & MENK INC.06/27/2022 118909 0290670 602-49450-305 GIS MAINTENANCE SEWER Sewer 405.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.06/27/2022 118909 0290670 601-49400-305 GIS MAINTENANCE WATER Water 795.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.06/27/2022 118909 0290670 651-49910-305 GIS MAINTENANCE STORM SEWER Storm Water 405.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.06/27/2022 118909 0290670 101-43170-305 GIS MAINTENANCE GENERAL Engineering 135.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.06/27/2022 118909 0290671 225-45200-319 22-055 SUMMIT BEACH MASTER PLAN 60.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.06/27/2022 118909 0290673 651-16500 22-028 NORTH SHORE RAVINE STABILIZATION 4,303.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.06/27/2022 118909 0290674 602-16500 22-014 SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION (CIP 705.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.06/27/2022 118909 0290681 435-48975-304 22-001 2022 STREETS PROJECT 5,833.50 BOLTON & MENK INC.06/27/2022 118909 0290682 602-16500 22-021 FORCEMAIN REPLACEMENT (TONKAWA)164.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.06/27/2022 118909 0290683 101-43170-303 21-040 NAVARRE PARKING LOT Engineering 93.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.06/27/2022 118909 0290684 602-16500 21-039 PW FACILITY UTILITIY CONSTRUCTION 1,242.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.06/27/2022 118909 0290686 601-16500 WALTERS POINT MAIN REPLACEMENT 21-022 60.00 Total 118909:42,617.50 BOYER TRUCKS INC 06/27/2022 118910 003P22611 701-49800-222 OIL AND FUEL FILTERS 424,5,6,7 795.06 Total 118910:795.06 BRIDGEWATER BANK- PETTY C 06/27/2022 118911 2022.06 GC 101-10300 2022- START UP CASH 100.00 Total 118911:100.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 06/27/2022 118912 2717-0000G 101-41600-307 GENERAL MATTERS 5/22 Law/Legal Services 2,433.60 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 06/27/2022 118912 2717-0004G 101-42110-307 POLICE MATTERS 5/22 Police Department 170.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 06/27/2022 118912 2717-0201G 101-41600-307 MISC RECORDINGS 5/2022 Law/Legal Services 201.75 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 06/27/2022 118912 2717-0740G 101-41600-307 LITIGATION - MERA CLAIM 5/22 Law/Legal Services 2,504.34 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 06/27/2022 118912 2717-0763G 101-43280-307 LA21-000058 GENNESARET PLAT Special Services 907.50 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 06/27/2022 118912 2717-0764G 101-43280-307 LA21-000051 1074 LOMA LINDA AVE Special Services 82.50 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 06/27/2022 118912 2717-0772G 101-43280-307 LA21-000003 (LONG BRIDGE 1485 6TH AVE N)Special Services 2,491.65 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 06/27/2022 118912 2717-0785G 101-43280-307 LA22-000024 (3350 FOX ST)Special Services 74.80 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 06/27/2022 118912 2717-0786G 101-43280-307 LA22-000015 (3245 WAYZATA BLVD W)Special Services 110.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 06/27/2022 118912 2717-0800G 101-42400-307 B&Z ASSISTANCE 5/22 Building & Zoning 391.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 06/27/2022 118912 2717-0801G 101-41600-307 COUNCIL MEETINGS 5/22 Law/Legal Services 1,054.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 06/27/2022 118912 2717-0802G 101-42400-307 B&Z ASSISTANCE 5/22 Building & Zoning 483.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 06/27/2022 118912 2717-0803G 101-41600-307 ORDINANCES 5/22 Law/Legal Services 1,258.00 Total 118912:12,162.14 CAPITAL BEVERAGE SALES LP 06/27/2022 118913 2697602 101-45210-091 ALCOHOL RESALE Golf Course 620.55 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 5 Check Issue Dates: 6/14/2022 - 6/27/2022 Jun 23, 2022 03:06PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 118913:620.55 Century Link 06/27/2022 118914 2022. 06 WP 601-49400-321 WP PHONE/INTERNET- 06/04/2022-07/03/2022 Water 138.97 Total 118914:138.97 CenturyLink 06/27/2022 118915 296859671 L 614-49840-329 INTERNET 05/08/22-06/07/2022 LUMEN Cable Franchise 1,056.15 Total 118915:1,056.15 CHARLIE'S AUTO BODY 06/27/2022 118916 2022.06 FIN 101-42110-402 SQUAD # 267 REPAIRS -LEFT REAR CORNER Police Department 3,968.47 Total 118916:3,968.47 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 06/27/2022 118917 0018530 101-42110-402 REPAIR -CANISTER PURGE VALVE - #253 Police Department 305.79 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 06/27/2022 118917 0018547 101-42110-402 OIL CHANGE/FILTER #260 Police Department 52.90 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 06/27/2022 118917 0018551 101-42110-402 OIL CHANGE/FILTER #256 Police Department 52.19 Total 118917:410.88 CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CO 06/27/2022 118918 0036151 101-41900-223 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES Central Services 389.00 Total 118918:389.00 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE MON 06/27/2022 118919 1598166 101-45210-091 ALCOHOL Golf Course 605.95 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE MON 06/27/2022 118919 1598166 101-45210-093 CONCESSIONS Golf Course 75.00 Total 118919:680.95 DELTA DENTAL 06/27/2022 118920 RIS0004247 101-21709 DENTAL JULY 2022 3,246.90 DELTA DENTAL 06/27/2022 118920 RIS0004247 101-15998 DENTAL JULY 2022 - COBRA 100.27 DELTA DENTAL 06/27/2022 118920 RIS0004247 101-15998 DENTAL JULY 2022 - COBRA 68.74- Total 118920:3,278.43 DENCO HTG & CLG 06/27/2022 118921 12010 101-41900-404 REPAIR OPW BUILDING UNIT Central Services 155.00 Total 118921:155.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 6 Check Issue Dates: 6/14/2022 - 6/27/2022 Jun 23, 2022 03:06PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount DOCK & LIFT INC 06/27/2022 118922 512808 101-43290-800 BIG ISLAND DOCK Special Projects-Contingencies 3,800.00 Total 118922:3,800.00 DVS RENEWAL 06/27/2022 118923 2022.06 101-42110-402 SQUAD TABS Police Department 38.50 Total 118923:38.50 EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOC 06/27/2022 118924 0129726-IN 101-45200-223 DOCK SIGNS Parks 136.35 EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOC 06/27/2022 118924 0129763-IN 101-43000-224 SOLAR FLASHERS FOR FIRE STATION SIGNS Public Works Department 110.45 Total 118924:246.80 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 06/27/2022 118925 897111 101-42400-340 PH FOR B&Z Building & Zoning 53.64 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 06/27/2022 118925 897299 101-42400-340 COMMUNITY DEV DIRETOR AD Building & Zoning 400.00 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 06/27/2022 118925 897300 101-43000-340 PUBLIC WORKS MAINT WORKER Public Works Department 340.00 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 06/27/2022 118925 898171 601-16500 22-023 WATERMAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECT 180.17 Total 118925:973.81 EMBEDDED SYSTEMS INC.06/27/2022 118926 344382 101-42110-403 SIREN CONTRACT Police Department 1,107.00 Total 118926:1,107.00 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #25 06/27/2022 118927 0489681 601-49400-227 XTRA HYDT FOR STOCK Water 4,876.85 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #25 06/27/2022 118927 0495049 601-49400-227 METER FOR RESALE Water 852.07 Total 118927:5,728.92 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 06/27/2022 118928 3270-539995 101-43000-240 SHOP SUPPLIES Public Works Department 9.59- GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 06/27/2022 118928 3270-539997 101-43000-240 SHOP SUPPLIES Public Works Department 9.59- GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 06/27/2022 118928 3270-540162 101-45200-402 BATTERY FOR ZERO-TURN #65288 Parks 70.10 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 06/27/2022 118928 3270-540250 101-43000-240 SHOP SUPPLIES Public Works Department 5.22 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 06/27/2022 118928 3270-540268 701-49800-221 BATTERY CORE 9.00- GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 06/27/2022 118928 3270-540578 701-49800-222 UNIT #713 FILTER 54.82 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 06/27/2022 118928 3270-541464 701-49800-221 OIL / FUEL FILTERS 112.55 Total 118928:214.51 GOPHER ACE 06/27/2022 118929 011281/1 101-42110-240 SCREWS N HARDWARE Police Department 6.39 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 7 Check Issue Dates: 6/14/2022 - 6/27/2022 Jun 23, 2022 03:06PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount GOPHER ACE 06/27/2022 118929 011323/1 701-49800-221 NUTS AND BOLTS 6.52 GOPHER ACE 06/27/2022 118929 011325/1 101-43000-221 CHAIN SAW CHAIN SHARPENING FILES Public Works Department 15.18 GOPHER ACE 06/27/2022 118929 011351/1 101-43000-212 OIL 2CYCLE Public Works Department 2.79 GOPHER ACE 06/27/2022 118929 11357/1 101-45200-223 ZIP TIES FOR DOCKS Parks 15.38 GOPHER ACE 06/27/2022 118929 11368/1 101-43000-212 FUEL SMALL ENGINES Public Works Department 15.58 GOPHER ACE 06/27/2022 118929 11371/1 701-49800-221 NUTS AND BOLTS 16.99 GOPHER ACE 06/27/2022 118929 11372/1 101-43000-212 CHAIN SAW OIL Public Works Department 47.98 Total 118929:126.81 GORDON JAMES CONSTRUCTI 06/27/2022 118930 2022.06 GO 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RAS19- 73 1070 HUNTER D 1,000.00 Total 118930:1,000.00 GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA 06/27/2022 118931 3609217518 101-45210-092 POP Golf Course 1,032.80 Total 118931:1,032.80 GUARDIAN FLEET SAFETY 06/27/2022 118932 22-0375 101-42110-402 SQUAD REPAIR #260 - BWC Police Department 634.60 Total 118932:634.60 HACH CHEMICAL CO 06/27/2022 118933 13094729 601-49400-216 WATER PLANT CHEMICALS Water 219.74 HACH CHEMICAL CO 06/27/2022 118933 13096964 601-49400-216 WATER PLANT CHEMICALS Water 249.76 Total 118933:469.50 HAUSER, MARY 06/27/2022 118934 2022.06 HAU 999-10015 UB REFUND - 1540 BOHNS PT RD 90.72 Total 118934:90.72 HAWKINS INC 06/27/2022 118935 6200822 601-49400-216 WATER PLANT CHEMICALS Water 1,697.74 Total 118935:1,697.74 HOLIDAY COMPANIES 06/27/2022 118936 0796010622 101-42110-402 CAR WASHES Police Department 236.50 Total 118936:236.50 LAKESCAPE LLC 06/27/2022 118937 826 101-45200-404 BEACH CLEAN-UPS Parks 843.34 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 8 Check Issue Dates: 6/14/2022 - 6/27/2022 Jun 23, 2022 03:06PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 118937:843.34 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 06/27/2022 118938 23322312 101-42110-212 UNLEADED FUEL Police Department 5,241.72 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 06/27/2022 118938 23322480 701-49800-212 DIESEL FUEL 797.81 Total 118938:6,039.53 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVI 06/27/2022 118939 0001141196 602-49450-383 WASTWATER SERVICE 7/2022 Sewer 59,036.55 Total 118939:59,036.55 Minnesota Topsoil 06/27/2022 118940 288 101-43000-408 TREE STUMP DISPOSAL Public Works Department 80.00 Minnesota Topsoil 06/27/2022 118940 290 101-43000-408 TREE STUMP DISPOSAL Public Works Department 80.00 Minnesota Topsoil 06/27/2022 118940 316 101-43000-408 TREE STUMP DISPOSAL Public Works Department 160.00 Minnesota Topsoil 06/27/2022 118940 336 101-43000-408 TREE STUMP DISPOSAL Public Works Department 120.00 Minnesota Topsoil 06/27/2022 118940 426 101-45200-223 BLACK DIRT Parks 470.00 Total 118940:910.00 MNSPECT LLC 06/27/2022 118941 8991 101-42400-310 MAY BUILDING SERVICES Building & Zoning 551.25 Total 118941:551.25 MOUND TRUE VALUE 06/27/2022 118942 181418 101-42110-240 SCREWS/NUTS/BOLTS Police Department 17.18 Total 118942:17.18 NAVARRE HARDWARE 06/27/2022 118943 337404 101-43000-224 MAILBOX HANDLE Public Works Department 7.56 NAVARRE HARDWARE 06/27/2022 118943 337516 101-43000-212 OIL 2CYCLE Public Works Department 40.98 Total 118943:48.54 Navarre Minnoco 06/27/2022 118944 2022-06 701-49800-212 NON OXY FUEL 48.73 Total 118944:48.73 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS.06/27/2022 118945 NCPERS061 101-21710 PERA LIFE 07/2022 320.00 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS.06/27/2022 118945 NCPERS061 101-21710 PERA LIFE 04/2022 OPEN BALANCE 32.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 9 Check Issue Dates: 6/14/2022 - 6/27/2022 Jun 23, 2022 03:06PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 118945:352.00 Newegg Business Inc 06/27/2022 118946 1303932042 710-49970-575 LAPTOP - BLG OFFICIAL 634.99 Newegg Business Inc 06/27/2022 118946 1303938704 710-49970-221 LAPTOP VEHICL ADAPTER 53.71 Newegg Business Inc 06/27/2022 118946 1303940173 710-49970-221 LAPTOP BATTERY 60.28 Total 118946:748.98 Oertel Architects, Ltd 06/27/2022 118947 #21-12.10 440-48975-319 21-039 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 1,860.00 Total 118947:1,860.00 OFFICE DEPOT 06/27/2022 118948 2462194240 101-42110-201 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES Police Department 30.58 Total 118948:30.58 On Time Delivery Service Inc.06/27/2022 118949 366739 101-41900-322 DELIVERY - CAMPBELL KNUTSON Central Services 122.18 Total 118949:122.18 OPD BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LL 06/27/2022 118950 2462194240 101-42110-201 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES Police Department 27.39 OPD BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LL 06/27/2022 118950 2475866960 101-42110-311 BOARD Police Department 146.01 OPD BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LL 06/27/2022 118950 2475885490 101-42110-201 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES Police Department 6.30 OPD BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LL 06/27/2022 118950 2475891600 101-42110-201 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES Police Department 137.98 OPD BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LL 06/27/2022 118950 24869113900 101-41900-201 WHITE BOARD AND MARKERS Central Services 60.52 OPD BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LL 06/27/2022 118950 2486915010 101-41900-201 FLY SWATTER Central Services 3.99 Total 118950:382.19 OTTEN BROTHERS 06/27/2022 118951 1-1703835 101-45210-223 WATERING BAG Golf Course 32.18 Total 118951:32.18 Perry's Truck Repair 06/27/2022 118952 53788 701-49800-222 UNIT #426 HITCH 90.00 Total 118952:90.00 POOL, BRODY 06/27/2022 118953 2022-06 101-43000-331 TRAVEL TO DOT CLASS - MENDOTA HEIGHTS Public Works Department 32.48 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 10 Check Issue Dates: 6/14/2022 - 6/27/2022 Jun 23, 2022 03:06PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 118953:32.48 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC 06/27/2022 118954 43110 602-49450-227 RUN TIME METERS FOR LIFT STATIONS Sewer 240.00 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC 06/27/2022 118954 43118 602-16500 GS # 4 REHAB 11,380.00 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC 06/27/2022 118954 43118 601-16500 GS #3 REHAB 11,380.00 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC 06/27/2022 118954 43118 602-16500 GS #5 REHAB 11,380.00 Total 118954:34,380.00 Reinders Inc.06/27/2022 118955 3088330-00 101-45210-223 POND ALGAECIDE Golf Course 579.89 Total 118955:579.89 RELENTLESS LLC 06/27/2022 118956 12029 101-42110-437 CRIMINAL INTERDICTION TRAINING - TREY/COL Police Department 1,298.00 Total 118956:1,298.00 SHAUGHNESSY LAWN CARE 06/27/2022 118957 2022.06 101-45200-404 PARK MOWING Parks 7,442.00 Total 118957:7,442.00 SiteOne Landscape Supply LLC 06/27/2022 118958 120064530-0 101-45210-223 SEED BLANKETS Golf Course 146.20 Total 118958:146.20 STONEWOOD 06/27/2022 118959 2022.06 STO 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RAS21-07 1150 PINE VIEW 1,000.00 Total 118959:1,000.00 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 06/27/2022 118960 1572287 101-42110-226 UNIFORM/EQUIPMENT - WESSELS Police Department 49.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 06/27/2022 118960 1572289 101-42110-226 UNIFORM EQUIPMENT Police Department 44.98 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 06/27/2022 118960 1572436 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS - SONNEK Police Department 31.98 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 06/27/2022 118960 1572449 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS - SONNEK Police Department 598.00 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 06/27/2022 118960 1572684 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS - SLIPKA Police Department 24.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 06/27/2022 118960 1572969 101-42110-580 SPECIAL EQUIPMENT - LMT 40MM/PATROL RIFL Police Department 909.98 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 06/27/2022 118960 1573727 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS - SLIPKA Police Department 380.98 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 06/27/2022 118960 1573783 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS - LANGE Police Department 189.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 06/27/2022 118960 1573930 101-42110-226 NEW HIRE UNIFORMS - KNAPEK Police Department 1,581.78 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 06/27/2022 118960 1573985 101-42110-226 NEW HIRE UNIFORMS - KNAPEK Police Department 11.99 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 11 Check Issue Dates: 6/14/2022 - 6/27/2022 Jun 23, 2022 03:06PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 06/27/2022 118960 CM292783 101-42110-226 CREDIT Police Department 15.99- Total 118960:3,808.67 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 06/27/2022 118961 0900700704 101-43000-226 UNIFORMS - PW Public Works Department 117.68 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 06/27/2022 118961 0900700704 101-43000-404 RUGS - PW Public Works Department 19.50 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 06/27/2022 118961 0900700704 701-49800-221 SHOP TOWELS - PW 5.70 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 06/27/2022 118961 0900702095 101-45210-223 LAUNDRY SERVICE Golf Course 26.07 Total 118961:168.95 WILLIAMS TOWING 06/27/2022 118962 #22-10924 101-42110-402 SQUAD REPAIR-TOW Police Department 217.00 Total 118962:217.00 WIN-911 Software 06/27/2022 118963 239XT232-20 601-49400-416 3-YR RENEWAL SCADA Water 1,782.00 Total 118963:1,782.00 Wright-Hennepin Coop Electric 06/27/2022 118964 3502969121 101-43100-381 BRUSH SITE 05/01/22-06/01/22 Brush Site 26.86 Wright-Hennepin Coop Electric 06/27/2022 118964 3502969121 101-45210-381 GC SECURITY 07/31/2022 Golf Course 41.82 Wright-Hennepin Coop Electric 06/27/2022 118964 3502969121 101-43000-381 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 05/22-06/22 Public Works Department 217.44 Total 118964:286.12 YAMAHA MOTOR CORP.06/27/2022 118965 776996 101-45210-415 CART LEASE Golf Course 1,647.00 YAMAHA MOTOR CORP.06/27/2022 118965 777035 101-45210-415 GOLF UTILITY CART RENTAL Golf Course 295.00 Total 118965:1,942.00 INNOVO BENEFITS ADMINISTR 06/27/2022 201302 1204342 101-42110-135 HEALTH INS 07/22 - POLICE CONT MCNICHOLS Police Department 734.84 INNOVO BENEFITS ADMINISTR 06/27/2022 201302 1204342 101-15998 HEALTH INSURANCE 07/22 - COBRA NON EMPL 3,915.36 INNOVO BENEFITS ADMINISTR 06/27/2022 201302 1204342 101-21706 HEALTH INSURANCE 07/22 61,460.96 Total 20130265:66,111.16 MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 06/27/2022 201302 2022.06 601-39610 WATER METER SALES 05/22 64.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 06/27/2022 201302 2022.06 601-20806 WATER TAXABLE SALES 05/22 775.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 06/27/2022 201302 2022.06 101-37910 GOLF COURSE GREEN FEES 05/22 2,952.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 06/27/2022 201302 2022.06 101-37920 RENTALS - SALES TAX 05/22 1,149.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 12 Check Issue Dates: 6/14/2022 - 6/27/2022 Jun 23, 2022 03:06PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 06/27/2022 201302 2022.06 101-37930 BEER - SALES TAX 05/22 339.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 06/27/2022 201302 2022.06 101-37940 CONCESSIONS - SALES TAX 5/22 123.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 06/27/2022 201302 2022.06 101-37960 GOLF BALLS - SALES TAX 5/22 39.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 06/27/2022 201302 2022.06 101-37970 PRO SHOP - SALES TAX 5/22 7.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 06/27/2022 201302 2022.06 101-37980 CLOTHING - SALES TAX 5/22 21.00 Total 20130266:5,469.00 Grand Totals: 300,891.74 AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: A. Carlson Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this item is to amend the 2022 Annual Appointments. 2. Background. The City Council amended the annual appointments list at the January 10th City Council Meeting. Based on direction received, staff prepared the attached draft of the amended resolution. The amended resolution appoints Mayor Dennis Walsh, Council Member Victoria Seals, Finance Director Ron Olson, and City Administrator/Engineer Adam Edwards to the Budget Committee. Also amended were the portions of the 2022 Annual Appointments where Jeremy Barnhart was appointed to serve. The title of Community Development Director was placed in the position in lieu of a name. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt Resolution No. 7274. Exhibits A. Annual Appointments Resolution Item No. 3 Date: June 27, 2022 Item Description: Approval to Amend the 2022 Annual Appointments Presenter: Anna Carlson City Clerk Agenda Section: Consent Agenda CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7274 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 7244 AND APPROVING A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING SELECTED APPOINTMENTS BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota that the appointments and designations for the year 2022 are as follows: APPOINTMENT/DESIGNATION Acting Mayor Aaron Printup Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Legislative Contact Dennis Walsh Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Representative Adam Edwards Attorney-City Lead (Civil) Soren Mattick Attorney-City Firm (Civil) Campbell, Knutson Attorney-Alternate Dorsey & Whitney Attorney-Lead Prosecuting Tallen & Baertschi Attorney-City Prosecuting Firm Tallen & Baertschi Auditor Abdo Eich & Meyers, LLP Budget Committee Dennis Walsh Victoria Seals Adam Edwards Ron Olson Code Review Committee Dennis Walsh Community Development Director Matt Johnson Communications Committee Dennis Walsh Victoria Seals Adam Edwards Anna Carlson Data Practices Compliance Official Anna Carlson Data Practices Compliance Official – Police Department Correy Farniok CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7274 Development Review Committee Laura Oakden Melanie Curtis Community Development Director Adam Edwards Emergency Preparedness Director Correy Farniok or designee Engineer-Lead Consulting David Martini Engineer-City Firm Bolton & Menk Fiscal Agents Ehlers & Associates Gillespie Center Dennis Walsh Hennepin Emergency Communications Organization Correy Farniok Highway 12 Safety Coalition Richard F. Crosby II Aaron Printup Correy Farniok Housing and Redevelopment Authority Dennis Walsh, Chair Adam Edwards, Executive Director Richard F. Crosby II Matt Johnson Aaron Printup Victoria Seals Ron Olson, Secretary Insurance Agent of Record Ronald Youngdahl, Northern Capital Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) Richard Anderson Long Lake Fire Advisory Commission Victoria Seals Richard F. Crosby II Adam Edwards Aaron Printup – Alternative Mayor's Association Dennis Walsh Official Newspaper The Laker & Pioneer CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7274 Official Depositories/Investment Vendors Axos Bank, CA Bank United, Miami BMO Harris Bank Bridgewater Bank – Navarre, MN Enerbank USA – SLC, UT First Bank of Greenwich, CN Goldman Sachs Bank – New York, NY JP Morgan Chase - NA League of MN Cities – 4M Fund Mercantil Commerce Bank, Coral Gables, FL Mercantil Commerce Banc, NA Merrick Bank – UT MS Private Bank – NY Preferred Bank, LA Progrowth Bank RBC Wealth Management, Mpls Sallie Mae Bank – Salt Lake City, UT State Bank of India, NY Synchrony Bank – Draper, UT Texas Exchange Bank, Crowley Toyota Savings Bank – Henderson, NV UBS Financial Services, Wayzata Wells Fargo Bank NA – CA Wells Fargo Advisors, Minneapolis Organizational Development Committee Victoria Seals Aaron Printup Adam Edwards Orono Ice Arena Board Member Dennis Walsh Park Commission Chair Brian Roath Park Commission Representative Dennis Walsh Victoria Seals Planning Commission Chair Alternating Planning Commission Representative to Council Alternating Police Advisory Commission Dennis Walsh Matt Johnson Adam Edwards School District Committee Dennis Walsh Victoria Seals Correy Farniok Adam Edwards CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7274 Suburban Rate Authority David (DJ) Goman Transportation Committee Adam Edwards Correy Farniok or designee Weed Inspector Dennis Walsh Weed Inspector-Assistant Josh Lemons Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held June 27, 2022. ATTEST: ___________________________________ _______________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: Correy Farniok Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain approval to hire a full-time police officer. An opening exists for a full-time police officer. 2. Background. An opening exists for a full-time police officer. 3. Recruitment. . The selection process for the position involved advertising the position, application screening, and interviews. First round interviews are completed by a panel of currently swerving officers and second round interviews by the Chief of Police. Police Officer applicant must also successfully complete a Psychological Exam, a Physical (Pre-employment medical) exam and has pass the MN Peace Officers Standards and Training (POST) licensing exam. 4. Recommended Candidate. Julia Knapek earned an associate’s degree in May 2022 from Alexandria Technical and Community College. Julia recently passed the MN P.O.S.T. licensing exam to be a peace officer in MN. Julia was previous employed by Stearns County as a water patrol park officer for the past two summers. Julia is excited about the opportunity to work for the Orono Police Department. Julia has completed and passed a comprehensive background investigation, a Psychological Exam, a Physical (Pre-employment medical) exam. 5. Staff Recommendation. I recommend to hire Julia Knapek as a full-time police officer at the with a start date of June 28, 2022. a. Salary. Starting rate will be $33.66 per hour and per the union contract this will be $34.00 per hour as of July 1, 2022. b. Benefits. As a full-time employee the position is eligible for benefits as outlined in the LELS Local 40 Agreement and personnel handbook. This includes enrollment in the Police and Fire Plan of the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA). COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the hiring of Julie Knapek as a full-time police officer at the rate of $33.66 per hour with a start date of June 28, 2022. Item No.: 4 Date: June 27, 2022 Item Description: Request to Hiring Full-Time Police Officer Presenter: Correy Farniok Police Chief Agenda Section: Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: Reviewed By: Approved By: 1. Purpose. Hennepin County Commissioner Chris LaTondresse will provide the council a presentation on Hennepin County items. . Item No.: 5 Date: June 27. 2022 Item Description: Hennepin County Commissioner Chris LaTondresse Presenter: Chris LaTondresse Hennepin County Commissioner Agenda Section: Presentation AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to meet the requirements of the City’s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System permit. (MS4) 2. Background. The City of Orono holds a MS4 permit under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program for operation of the City’s stormwater drainage system. The NPDES is a national regulatory program under the jurisdiction of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and is administered at the State level by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). 3. Requirement. A requirement of the permit is that an Annual Report be prepared and submitted to the MPCA. Staff has prepared the report, and will submit to the MPCA after this meeting. One component of the report is that the City must hold a Public Meeting. The meeting must provide a summary of the City’s Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP), the activities of the City for the past calendar year in regards to the permit requirements, and must afford the opportunity for public input and comment. 4. Action. There will be a short presentation as part of the public hearing. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Conduct a public hearing to receive public input and comments regarding the City of Orono’s SWPPP. Item No.: 6 Date: June 27, 2022 Item Description: Annual Public Hearing for MS4 Storm Water Permit Presenter: Adam T. Edwards City Administrator/City Engineer Agenda Section: Public Hearing AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: L. Oakden Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By 1.Purpose. To review the variances for building, hardcover, and retaining walls in the 75’ lakeyard setback, side yard setback, as well as a lot area variance for the construction of a new house. As well as, a wetland setback variance for new entrance monuments. 2.Background. This property has a unique lakeshore inlet (“French Lake Creek”) from Lake Minnetonka on the west side of the property establishing an additional 75-footlake yard in addition to the 75-foot lakeyard from the lake on the south side of the property. The applicant is proposing to build a new home and is working to utilize some of the existing footprint of the current house. The existing home sits about 18 feet from the Lake Minnetonka and 50 feet from the inlet on the west. The applicant proposes to construct the new home further from the lake, 36.5 feet from the OHWL of the lake, and 53 feet from the OHWL of the inlet. The proposal includes the removal of hardcover on the west and south sides of the property. To minimize the inlet encroachment, the applicant proposes to move the home closer to the east side property line, into the east side yard setback. The applicant has designed the home to improve the current setbacks and hardcover encroachments. The application depicts a new location for entrance monuments. The property currently has entrance monuments that can be rebuilt or maintained. If the existing entrance monuments are removed, the new monuments would be required to meet all city code standards. The new entrance monuments in the proposed location create a larger setback from North Shore Drive, however the proposed monuments are approximately 5 feet from the edge of the wetland where 25’ is required and completely within the 75’ foot lakeyard setback. A variance was approved for a new home in 2019 (#LA19-000049). The 2019 approvals have expired. The new application is reflecting similar variances. The home in the 2019 approvals had a 19’ side yard setback, the current application is showing a 21’ side yard setback. 3.15.99 Deadline. The application was received on May 18, 2022 and was deemed complete on June 7, 2022. The 60-day review period will expire August 6, 2022. 4.Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On June 21, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. The commission discussed the proposed variances and discussed the benefit of moving the proposed house further away from Lake Minnetonka. The commission talked at length about the proposed entrance monuments and provided feedback, noting that the proposed placement of the monuments does not meet practical difficulty standards. However, the commission was open to a redesign of the existing monuments within the existing concrete pad. The commission voted 6-1, on a motion to follow staff’s recommendation to approve the building, hardcover, and retaining walls in the 75’ lakeyard setback, side yard setback, and lot area; and to deny the wetland setback and 75’ foot lakeyard setback request for new entrance monuments. 5.Public Comment The applicant submitted two neighbor signatures for the project. No comments were made during the public hearing. Item No.: 7 Date: June 27, 2022 Item Description: LA22-000028, Peter Eskuche with Eskuche Design, 2605 North Shore Drive, Variances – Resolution No. 7272 Presenter: Laura Oakden Interim Community Development Director Agenda Section: Zoning Report 6. Staff Recommendation. Planning Staff recommends approval of the proposed variances for hardcover, building, and retaining walls in the 75’ lakeyard, side yard setback and lot area for construction of a new house. Staff recommends denial of the proposed wetland setback for the new entrance monuments as the practical difficulty standards are not met. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve or amend the draft resolution 7272. Exhibits A. Draft Resolution 7272 B. Proposed Plans C. PC Staff Report References 1. PC 6.21.22 Meeting Video 2. PC Exhibits A. Application and Narrative B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form C. Survey and Site Plans D. Proposed Plans and Elevations E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations F. 2019 PC memo and Approved Resolution G. Neighbor’s Comments H. Property Owners List and Map CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7272 1 A RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-305, 78-72, 78-1279, 78-1680 AND DENYING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE 78-1605 FILE NO. LA22-000028 WHEREAS, on May18, 2022, Eskucke Design (hereinafter the “Applicant”), applied for variances from City Code for the property addressed 2605 North Shore Drive and legally described as: That part of Government Lot 4, Section 9, Township 117, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at the North quarter corner of said section; thence on a bearing of South (the North line of the Northeast Quarter of said section being assumed to have a bearing of North 88 degrees 51 minutes West for purposes of this description) a distance of 2878.55 feet; thence South 70 degrees 37 minutes 31 seconds East a distance of 838.42 feet; thence South 67 degrees 19 minutes 23 seconds East a distance of 266.25 feet to Point A, said point A being the point of beginning of the property being described and also the beginning of line A; thence South 32 degrees 16 minutes 30 seconds West along said line A to a point on the shore of Lake Minnetonka, and said Line A there ending; thence Southeasterly along said shore to a point 300 feet Southeasterly from said Line A, said 300 feet being measured on a bearing of South 59 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds East from said line A; thence North 32 degrees 16 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 370 feet to an intersection with a line drawn South 59 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds East from said Point A; thence North 59 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds West to said Point A, the point of beginning; except that part of said above described property lying Southeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at said Point A; thence South 59 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 246.74 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence South 34 degrees 54 minutes 30 seconds West to the shore of Lake Minnetonka, and said there ending. Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the “Property”); WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305 to allow for a 21’ side yard setback along the east side of the Property; and CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7272 2 WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow for a new home, retaining walls, and entrance monuments be located within the 75’ lakeyard setback; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1680 to allow new hardcover within the 75’ lakeshore setback; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-72 to allow for construction of a new home on a substandard parcel; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1605 for a wetland setback variance for new entrance monuments, and; WHEREAS, on June 21, 2022, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the City Council held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on June 21, 2022, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the building, hardcover, retaining wall, side yard setback, and lot area variances; and WHEREAS, on June 21, 2022, the Planning Commission recommended denial of the wetland and lakeyard setback of the variance for new entrance monuments, and WHEREAS, on June 27, 2022, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves and denies the requested variances as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File # LA22-000028. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7272 3 2. The Property is located in the LR-1A Zoning District. 3. The Property contains 1.86 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 230 feet at the OHWL. 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. Applicant has applied for the following variances: 6. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed variances are in harmony with the intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The goal of the ordinance is to reduce or eliminate improvements in the lake yard, the proposal shifts away from the lake yard as much as practical. This criterion is met. The new entrance monuments are not in harmony with the ordinance to prevent improvements within the wetland and lakeyard setback; this criterion is not met. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variances to develop a nonconforming lot of record are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of the home on the substandard lot, in the proposed location within the lake, and side yard setbacks, appears to be reasonable considering the Property’s reduced size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore. The hardcover and retaining walls proposed within the lake yard appear to be reasonable. a) Hardcover in the 75’ lakeyard b) Buildings in the 75’ lakeyard c) Retaining walls in the 75’ lakeyard d) Side yard setback e) Lot area f) Wetland setback CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7272 4 The entrance monuments are permitted by the city code but the proposed location is not reasonable within the wetland buffer and lakeyard setback. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The lake and its inlet limit the building envelope for the property. The surrounding lakeshore is unique property feature of the lane and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances are requested in order to permit construction of a home designed to fit the character of the neighborhood according to the submitted information. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the LR-1A District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The Property’s substandard size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore creates difficulties which may also apply to properties in the same neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The Property’s substandard size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore creates difficulties which may also apply to properties in the same neighborhood. However, the location of the lake surrounding the building envelope is very unique to the Property. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Granting a lot area, side yard and lake setback variances are necessary for the preservation of the property right of the application. The variances for retaining walls and hardcover in the lakeyard facilitate the use of the Property for the new home and are necessary for the preservation of the property rights of the owners. The wetland buffer setback and 75 foot lakeyard setback variances for the new entrance monuments are not necessary for the enjoyment and use of the Property. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7272 5 requested variances in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variances do not merely serve as a convenience to the Applicant. The variances are necessary as the Property has considerable practical difficulties affecting development. The entrance monuments are accessory structures to the principle building and granting the requested variance would be a convenience and not necessary for the use of the Property. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305, 78-72, 78-1279, 78-1680 to allow construction of a new house and hereby denies the variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1605 and 78-1279 for new entrance monuments, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the survey and building plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A. 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variances will expire on that date (June 27, 2023). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this ______ day of ________________, 20__. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7272 6 _______________________________ ________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor LAKEVIEWS RESIDENCE 2605 N. SHORE DR, ORONO, MN 55391 SHEET 9 VARIANCE SET 18 MAY 2022 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 17'-10 1/2"2'-9"35'-0"2'-9"42'-4 1/2"12'-6"2'-6" 115'-9" 4' - 7 1/ 2 " 20 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 4' - 0 " 3' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 36 ' - 9 " 13 ' - 9 1/ 4 " 10 0 ' - 1 3/ 4 " 8' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 5' - 6 " 7' - 9 " 5' - 7 1/ 2 " 6' - 1 0 1/ 2 " 18 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 1 0 1/ 2 " 13 ' - 7 3/ 4 " 23'-9"2'-0" 36 ' - 1 0 1/ 2 " 3' - 1 1/ 2 " 7' - 0 " 8'-0"25'-9"82'-0" 3' - 2 1/ 2 " 6' - 8 " 2' - 0 " 8'-4 1/2"2'-9"12'-7 1/2" 15'-10 1/2"9'-10 1/2"9'-4 1/2"2'-7 1/2"12'-3"42'-11"12'-4"2'-6" 4' - 7 1/ 2 " 12 ' - 9 1/ 4 " 24 ' - 1 1/ 4 " 3' - 1 1/ 2 " 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' TYP CEILING HEIGHT = 9'-0½" APPROX. SF = 3,605 FINISHED + 908 GARAGE + 660 HVAC/STORAGE + 882 PATIO + 173 COLD STOR. LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN VARIANCE RESUBMITTAL 7 JUNE 2022 LAKEVIEWS RESIDENCE 2605 N. SHORE DR, ORONO, MN 55391 SHEET 10 VARIANCE SET 18 MAY 2022 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 4' - 6 " 12 ' - 9 " 24 ' - 3 " 3' - 0 " 8'-6"2'-9"12'-9" 24'-0"2'-0" 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' 37 ' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 37 ' - 0 " 5' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 4' - 6 " 82 ' - 0 " 17 ' - 0 " 8'-0" 34 ' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 7' - 0 " 2' - 0 " 18 ' - 0 " 19 ' - 0 " 6' - 9 " 18 ' - 0 " 19 ' - 0 " 17 ' - 0 " 18'-0"2'-9"35'-0"2'-9"55'-0"2'-6" 1'-3"1'-6"35'-0"1'-3"1'-6"55'-0"1'-0" 5' - 4 " 4' - 9 1/ 4 " 10 3/ 4 " 10 3 ' - 6 " 116'-0" 8' - 1 0 " 9' - 2 " 5' - 6 " 8' - 0 " 5' - 6 " 10 ' - 1 1/ 4 " 6' - 1 0 3/ 4 " 26'-0"82'-0" 9'-3"2'-9"12'-0"27'-1"2'-9"13'-4"12'-4"2'-6" TYP CEILING HEIGHT = 9'-1⅛" APPROX. SF = 4,071 FINISHED + 962 GARAGE + 1,375 TERRACE + 370 COVERED OUTDOOR MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN VARIANCE RESUBMITTAL 7 JUNE 2022 LAKEVIEWS RESIDENCE 2605 N. SHORE DR, ORONO, MN 55391 SHEET 11 VARIANCE SET 18 MAY 2022 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 L.L. SLAB 932.5' -11'-1 1/4" M.L. SUBFLOOR 943.6' ±0" TYP ROOF BEARING +9'-1 1/8" UPPER ROOF BEARING +15'-10 3/4" M.L. SUBFLOOR 943.6' ±0" TYP ROOF BEARING +9'-1 1/8" UPPER ROOF BEARING +15'-4" L.L. SLAB 932.5' -11'-1 1/4" M.L. SUBFLOOR 943.6' ±0" TYP ROOF BEARING +9'-1 1/8" UPPER ROOF BEARING +15'-10 3/4" 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' 1 NORTH ELEVATION 3 WEST GARAGE ELEVATION 2 WEST ELEVATION VARIANCE RESUBMITTAL 7 JUNE 2022 LAKEVIEWS RESIDENCE 2605 N. SHORE DR, ORONO, MN 55391 SHEET 12 VARIANCE SET 18 MAY 2022 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 L.L. SLAB 932.5' -11'-1 1/4" M.L. SUBFLOOR 943.6' ±0" TYP ROOF BEARING +9'-1 1/8" UPPER ROOF BEARING +15'-10 3/4" 23 ' - 1 0 " BU I L D I N G HE I G H T < 30 ' - 0 " MA X . 10 ' - 0 " HIGHEST EXISTING GRADE 938.0' LOWEST GRADE 932.0' REFERENCE LINE (10' ABOVE LOWEST) ROOF DEFINED (TOP OF CORNICE) L.L. SLAB 932.5' -11'-1 1/4" M.L. SUBFLOOR 943.6' ±0" TYP ROOF BEARING +9'-1 1/8" UPPER ROOF BEARING +15'-10 3/4" L.L. SLAB 932.5' -11'-1 1/4" M.L. SUBFLOOR 943.6' ±0" TYP ROOF BEARING +9'-1 1/8" 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' 1 SOUTH ELEVATION 2 EAST ELEVATION 3 EAST HIDDEN VARIANCE RESUBMITTAL 7 JUNE 2022 LAKEVIEWS RESIDENCE 2605 N. SHORE DR, ORONO, MN 55391 SHEET 2 VARIANCE RESUBMITTAL 7 JUNE 2022 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 OLD RO A D B E D RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES AS SHOWN ON R.L.S. NO. 1467 SAN MH CH A I N -LIN K FE N C E S 32 °16 '30 " W 341 .90 S 70°37'31" E 838.42 S 67°19'23" E 266.25 93 2 9 3 2 932 930 932 934 930 9 3 2 9 3 4 9 3 6 93 0 9 3 2 EXISTING HOUSE #2655 LAKE MINNETONKA EAST CRYSTAL BAY CONCRETE BRIDGE EXISTI N G WOOD BRIDG E RIPR A P RIP R A P S 59°05'30" E 24 6 .74 33 33 CO . RD . NO . 51 NO R T H SH O R E DR I V E 44" WILLOW EXISTING HOUSE 929.4 CONTOUR LINE (O.H.W.) (N.G.V.D. 1929) UNDER CONSTRUCTION S 34 °54 '30 " W 358 .83 13 +- 23.7 CON C R E T E WAL K FR E N C H CR E E K N 54 °59'28 " W 23 0 .45 FLAGPOLE (FRENCH CREEK) CONCRETE GEN PAD 36 " WIL L O W TWIN 28" WILLOW 30" WILL O W 30" WILLO W 30 " WILLO W ' 44" WILLOW'40" WILLOW' 16 "x 24 " WILLO W DEAD WILLO W 8 "x 14 " BIRC H 8 " ASH 16" ASH 14" ASH BIRCH CLUMP TWIN 24" OAK 4"x6"x10 " BI R C H 10 "x10 " BI R C H 10 " C R A B -AP P L E POND SPR U C E RO W SPR U C E RO W 6" 6" 12" 12" PILLAR SPRUCE S REMOVE EXISTING FOUNTAIN 930 10" CRABAPPLE 10" CR A B A P P L E 12" SPRUCE 12" SPRUCE EXISTING BLACKTOP DRIVEWAY BLACKTOP DRIVEWAY BLA C K T O P DRIV E W A Y RIP R A P 93 1 .5 931 .5 RETA I N I N G WALL 93 1 .5 931 .5 93 1 .5 93 1 .5 0 .3 39 +- 10 "x16 " BI R C H 33 .01 CO N C . CO N C . PILLAR PILLAR EXI S T I N G GA T E CU L V E R T CON C . WAL K CO N C . W A L K SURVEY LINE 35.8 4 .516.4 1 7 .1 3 .9 5 3 .0 36 .8 2 7 .2 4 .2 1 9 .4 1 .9 1 0 .9 5.8 10.7 2 .0 27.0 3 .4 7.0 8 .9 7.0 3 .0 2.0 17 .6 BLAC K T O P ROAD W A Y GOV'T LOT 4 91.8 (937.4) (935.8) (93 5 .8 ) CONC. CONCRET E WALK DECK DECK WOOD BORDER (TYP) 930 WOOD BORD E R WOOD BORDER (TYP) WOOD BORDER Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Order in Case No. 27-ET-CV-15-61 Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Order in Case No. 27-ET-CV-15-61 (933 .2) 2-8" SP R U C E S WOOD BORDER (TYP) A / C WA L K W O O D BO R D E R ROO F OVE R H A N G (931 .9) (93 2 .2) (931.9) (93 1 .4) ( 9 3 0 . 4 ) ( 9 3 2 . 2 ) ( 9 3 3 . 2 ) 20' S A N I T A R Y SE W E R E A S E M E N T PE R D O C . N O . 14 1 0 9 1 3 1 0 1 0 10 10 10 10 WALL W A L L (93 2 .8) (932.7) (932 .2) (932.1) (93 3 .9) (931.3) SEWER CLEANOUT (A) (9 3 8 .9) (9 3 7 .6) GARAGE FLOOR= (937.8) FLOOR LEVEL= (940.1) FLOOR LEVEL= (932.1) R O C K W A L K (93 7 .8) CON C R E T E APR O N (937 .6 ) ( 9 3 7 .3 ) W D . B O R D E R (937.1) (935.4) (937 .0 ) (937 .8 ) (937.8) (93 4 .9 ) (932 .9 ) X 0 .3 16 .79 FOUND SPIKE (B) (B) W A L L AN D PI L L A R S WAL K UND E R DEC K DECK (B) (C) (D) (D) (D) (D ) (F) (F) (F) (G) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) WALL & PILLARS (N) (O) (O) (O) (P) (P) (P) (O) (931.3) (93 0 .2) (929.9) (93 0 .1) 932 932 934 936 93 8 93 6 93 4 93 4 932 (Q) 9 3 2 (931.0) (930 .9 ) (931 .7 ) 9 3 1 . 5 (931.6) 93 1 .5 931 .5 932 932 (935.5) 938 936 93 4 (937 .0 ) (933.0) (936 .9 ) (935.6) (931 .7 ) (931.4) (M) (M) POINT A LINE A (E) (E) (O) (O) (O) S T E P S 938 EDGE OF WETLAND AS DELINEATED BY ANDERSON ENGINEERING OF MN (TYP) WETLAND STAKE PER ANDERSON ENGINEERING OF MN (TYP) ED G E OF DE L I N E A T E D WE T L A N D 7 5 ' - 0 " 75 ' - 0 " 7 5 ' - 0 " 30 ' - 0 " CONFORMING ALLOWABLE BUILDABLE AREA EXISTING NON-CONFORMING HOME TO BE REMOVED 7 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 8 0 2 0 1 0 N W E S 0 20'40'60'80' 1 CONFORMING AREA SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNRISE WINTER SOLSTICE SUNRISE SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNRISE WINTER SOLSTICE SUNRISE LAKEVIEWS RESIDENCE 2605 N. SHORE DR, ORONO, MN 55391 SHEET 3 VARIANCE RESUBMITTAL 7 JUNE 2022 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 9,180 sq ft PROPOSED FRENCH CREEK & LAKE MTKA LAKESHORE HARDCOVER 3,946 sq ft PROPOSED LAKE MTKA LAKESHORE HARDCOVER 13,610 sq ft EXISTING FRENCH CREEK & LAKE MTKA LAKESHORE HARDCOVER 6,368 sq ft EXISTING LAKE MTKA LAKESHORE HARDCOVER OLD RO A D B E D RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES AS SHOWN ON R.L.S. NO. 1467 SAN MH CH A I N -LIN K FE N C E S 32 °16 '30 " W 341 .90 S 70°37'31" E 838.42 S 67°19'23" E 266.25 93 2 9 3 2 932 930 932 934 930 9 3 2 9 3 4 9 3 6 93 0 9 3 2 EXISTING HOUSE #2655 LAKE MINNETONKA EAST CRYSTAL BAY CONCRETE BRIDGE EXISTI N G WOOD BRIDG E RIPR A P RIP R A P S 59°05'30" E 24 6 .74 33 33 66 CO . RD . NO . 51 NO R T H SH O R E DR I V E 44" WILLOW 929.4 CONTOUR LINE (O.H.W.) (N.G.V.D. 1929) UNDER CONSTRUCTION S 34 °54 '30 " W 358 .83 13 +- 23.7 FR E N C H CR E E K N 54 °59'28 " W 23 0 .45 (FRENCH CREEK) 36 " WIL L O W TWIN 28" WILLOW 30" WILL O W 30" WILLO W 30 " WILLO W ' 44" WILLOW'40" WILLOW' 16 "x 24 " WILLO W 8 "x 14 " BIRC H 8 " ASH 16" ASH 14" ASH TWIN 24" OAK 4"x6"x10 " BI R C H 10 "x10 " BI R C H POND SPR U C E RO W SPR U C E RO W 6" 6" 12" 930 BLA C K T O P DRIV E W A Y RIP R A P 93 1 .5 931 .5 93 1 .5 931 .5 93 1 .5 93 1 .5 0 .3 39 +- 10 "x16 " BI R C H 33 .01 CU L V E R T SURVEY LINE 35.8 BLAC K T O P ROAD W A Y GOV'T LOT 4 91.8 CONC. 930 Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Order in Case No. 27-ET-CV-15-61 Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Order in Case No. 27-ET-CV-15-61 (933 .2) (931 .9) (93 2 .2) (931.9) (93 1 .4) ( 9 3 0 . 4 ) ( 9 3 2 . 2 ) ( 9 3 3 . 2 ) 20' S A N I T A R Y SE W E R E A S E M E N T PE R D O C . N O . 14 1 0 9 1 3 1 0 1 0 10 10 10 10 (93 2 .8) (932.7) (932.1) (93 3 .9) (931.3) SEWER CLEANOUT ( 9 3 7 .3 ) (935.4) (937 .0 ) (937.8) (93 4 .9 ) (932 .9 ) X 0 .3 16 .79 FOUND SPIKE (D) (I) (J) (O) (931.3) (93 0 .2) (929.9) (93 0 .1) 932 932 934 936 93 8 93 6 93 4 93 4 932 (Q) 9 3 2 (931.0) (930 .9 ) (931 .7 ) 9 3 1 . 5 (931.6) 93 1 .5 931 .5 932 932 938 936 93 4 (937 .0 ) (933.0) (931 .7 ) (931.4) POINT A LINE A EDGE OF WETLAND AS DELINEATED BY ANDERSON ENGINEERING OF MN (TYP) WETLAND STAKE PER ANDERSON ENGINEERING OF MN (TYP) ED G E OF DE L I N E A T E D WE T L A N D 7 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 8 0 2 0 1 0 N W E S 0 20'40'60'80' 1 LAKESHORE HARDCOVER AREA SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNRISE WINTER SOLSTICE SUNRISE SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNRISE WINTER SOLSTICE SUNRISE LAKEVIEWS RESIDENCE 2605 N. SHORE DR, ORONO, MN 55391 SHEET 4 VARIANCE RESUBMITTAL 7 JUNE 2022 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 21' - 0 " DECK ABOVE T.O.W. 934.4 B.O.W. 932.0 T.O.W. 936.5 B.O.W. 933.9 932 934 936 938940 934 x 934.75 934.75 x 932.0 x 932.0 x A V E R A G E SE T B A C K 940 938 936 934 934 932 934 932 936 938 940 940.5 x 934 x 942.5 ML SUBFLOOR 943.6' L.L. SLAB 932.5' OLD RO A D B E D RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES AS SHOWN ON R.L.S. NO. 1467 SAN MH CH A I N -LIN K FEN C E S 32 °16 '30 " W 341 .90 93 2 9 3 2 932 930 932 934 930 9 3 2 9 3 4 9 3 6 93 0 9 3 2 EXISTING HOUSE #2655 LAKE MINNETONKA EAST CRYSTAL BAY CONCRETE BRIDGE EXISTI N G WOOD BRIDG E RIPR A P RIP R A P S 59°05'30" E 24 6 .74 33 33 CO . RD . NO . 51 NO R T H SH O R E DR I V E 44" WILLOW EXISTING HOUSE 929.4 CONTOUR LINE (O.H.W.) (N.G.V.D. 1929) UNDER CONSTRUCTION S 34 °54 '30 " W 358 .83 13 +- 23.7 CON C R E T E WAL K FR E N C H CR E E K N 54 °59'28 " W 23 0 .45 FLAGPOLE (FRENCH CREEK) CONCRETE GEN PAD 36 " WIL L O W TWIN 28" WILLOW 30" WILL O W 30" WILLO W 30 " WILLO W ' 44" WILLOW'40" WILLOW' 16 "x 24 " WILLO W DEAD WILLO W 8 "x 14 " BIRC H 8 " ASH 16" ASH 14" ASH BIRCH CLUMP TWIN 24" OAK 4"x6"x10 " BI R C H 10 "x10 " BI R C H 10 " C R A B -AP P L E POND SPR U C E RO W SPR U C E RO W 6" 6" 12" 12" PILLAR SPRUCE S REMOVE EXISTING FOUNTAIN 930 10" CRABAPPLE 10" CR A B A P P L E 12" SPRUCE 12" SPRUCE EXISTING BLACKTOP DRIVEWAY BLACKTOP DRIVEWAY BLA C K T O P DRIV E W A Y RIP R A P 93 1 .5 931 .5 RETA I N I N G WALL 93 1 .5 931 .5 93 1 .5 93 1 .5 0 .3 39 +- 10 "x16 " BI R C H 33 .01 CO N C . CO N C . PILLAR PILLAR EXI S T I N G GA T E CU L V E R T CON C . WAL K CO N C . W A L K SURVEY LINE 35.8 4 .516.4 1 7 .1 3 .9 5 3 .0 36 .8 2 7 .2 4 .2 1 9 .4 1 .9 1 0 .9 5.8 10.7 2 .0 27.0 3 .4 7.0 8 .9 7.0 3 .0 2.0 17 .6 BLAC K T O P ROAD W A Y GOV'T LOT 4 91.8 (937.4) (935.8) (93 5 .8 ) CONC. CONCRET E WALK DECK DECK WOOD BORDER (TYP) 930 WOOD BORDE R WOOD BORDER (TYP) WOOD BORDER Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Order in Case No. 27-ET-CV-15-61 Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Order in Case No. 27-ET-CV-15-61 (933 .2) 2-8" SP R U C E S WOOD BORDER (TYP) A / C WA L K W O O D BO R D E R ROO F OVE R H A N G (931 .9) (93 2 .2) (931.9) (93 1 .4) ( 9 3 0 . 4 ) ( 9 3 2 . 2 ) ( 9 3 3 . 2 ) 20' SA N I T A R Y S E W E R EA S E M E N T P E R D O C . N O . 14 1 0 9 1 3 1 0 1 0 10 10 10 10 WALL W A L L (93 2 .8) (932.7) (932 .2) (932.1) (93 3 .9) (931.3) SEWER CLEANOUT (A) (9 3 8 .9) (9 3 7 .6) GARAGE FLOOR= (937.8) FLOOR LEVEL= (940.1) FLOOR LEVEL= (932.1) R O C K W A L K (93 7 .8) CON C R E T E APR O N (937 .6 ) ( 9 3 7 .3 ) W D . B O R D E R (937.1) (935.4) (937 .0 ) (937 .8 ) (937.8) (93 4 .9 ) (932 .9 ) X 0 .3 16 .79 FOUND SPIKE (B) (B) W A L L AN D PI L L A R S WAL K UND E R DEC K DECK (B) (C) (D) (D) (D) (D ) (F) (F) (F) (G) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) WALL & PILLARS (N) (O) (O) (O) (P) (P) (P) (O) (931.3) (93 0 .2) (929.9) (93 0 .1) 932 932 934 936 93 8 93 6 93 4 934 932 (Q) 9 3 2 (931.0) (930 .9 ) (931 .7 ) 9 3 1 . 5 (931.6) 93 1 .5 931 .5 932 932 (935.5) 938 936 93 4 (937 .0 ) (933.0) (936 .9 ) (935.6) (931 .7 ) (931.4) (M) (M) POINT A LINE A (E) (E) (O) (O) (O) S T E P S 938 EDGE OF WETLAND AS DELINEATED BY ANDERSON ENGINEERING OF MN (TYP) WETLAND STAKE PER ANDERSON ENGINEERING OF MN (TYP) ED G E OF DEL I N E A T E D WET L A N D AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK BASED ON ADJACENT HOMES ITEMS IN RED TO BE REMOVED T.O.W. 939.5 B.O.W. 936.5 T.O.W. 936.5 B.O.W. 933.9 T.O.W. 934.4 B.O.W. 932.0 GARAGE 942.6' L.L. GAR. 932.5' 7 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 8 0 2 0 1 0 N W E S 0 20'40'60'80'1 SITE PLAN w/ADJACENT HOMES SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNRISE WINTER SOLSTICE SUNRISE SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNRISE WINTER SOLSTICE SUNRISE LAKEVIEWS RESIDENCE 2605 N. SHORE DR, ORONO, MN 55391 SHEET 5 VARIANCE RESUBMITTAL 7 JUNE 2022 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 OLD RO A D B E D RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES AS SHOWN ON R.L.S. NO. 1467 SAN MH CH A I N -LIN K FE N C E S 32 °16 '30 " W 341 .90 S 67°19'23" E 266.25 93 2 9 3 2 932 930 932 934 930 9 3 2 9 3 4 9 3 6 93 0 9 3 2 EXISTING HOUSE #2655 LAKE MINNETONKA EAST CRYSTAL BAY CONCRETE BRIDGE EXISTI N G WOOD BRIDG E RIPR A P RIP R A P S 59°05'30" E 24 6 .74 33 33 CO . RD . NO . 51 NO R T H SH O R E DR I V E 44" WILLOW EXISTING HOUSE 929.4 CONTOUR LINE (O.H.W.) (N.G.V.D. 1929) UNDER CONSTRUCTION S 34 °54 '30 " W 358 .83 13 +- 23.7 CON C R E T E WAL K FR E N C H CR E E K N 54 °59'28 " W 23 0 .45 FLAGPOLE (FRENCH CREEK) CONCRETE GEN PAD 36 " WIL L O W TWIN 28" WILLOW 30" WILL O W 30" WILLO W 30 " WILLO W ' 44" WILLOW'40" WILLOW' 16 "x 24 " WILLO W DEAD WILLO W 8 "x 14 " BIRC H 8 " ASH 16" ASH 14" ASH BIRCH CLUMP TWIN 24" OAK 4"x6"x10 " BI R C H 10 "x10 " BI R C H 10 " C R A B -AP P L E POND SPR U C E RO W SPR U C E RO W 6" 6" 12" 12" PILLAR SPRUCE S REMOVE EXISTING FOUNTAIN 930 10" CRABAPPLE 10" CR A B A P P L E 12" SPRUCE 12" SPRUCE EXISTING BLACKTOP DRIVEWAY BLACKTOP DRIVEWAY BLA C K T O P DRIV E W A Y RIP R A P 93 1 .5 931 .5 RETA I N I N G WALL 93 1 .5 931 .5 93 1 .5 93 1 .5 0 .3 39 +- 10 "x16 " BI R C H 33 .01 CO N C . CO N C . PILLAR PILLAR EXI S T I N G GA T E CU L V E R T CON C . WAL K CO N C . W A L K SURVEY LINE 35.8 4 .516.4 1 7 .1 3 .9 5 3 .0 36 .8 2 7 .2 4 .2 1 9 .4 1 .9 1 0 .9 5.8 10.7 2 .0 27.0 3 .4 7.0 8 .9 7.0 3 .0 2.0 17 .6 BLAC K T O P ROAD W A Y GOV'T LOT 4 91.8 (937.4) (935.8) (93 5 .8 ) CONC. CONCRET E WALK DECK DECK WOOD BORDER (TYP) 930 WOOD BORD E R WOOD BORDER (TYP) WOOD BORDER Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Order in Case No. 27-ET-CV-15-61 Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Order in Case No. 27-ET-CV-15-61 (933 .2) 2-8" SP R U C E S WOOD BORDER (TYP) A / C WA L K W O O D BO R D E R ROO F OVE R H A N G (931 .9) (93 2 .2) (931.9) (93 1 .4) ( 9 3 0 . 4 ) ( 9 3 2 . 2 ) ( 9 3 3 . 2 ) 20' S A N I T A R Y SE W E R E A S E M E N T PE R D O C . N O . 14 1 0 9 1 3 1 0 1 0 10 10 10 10 WALL W A L L (93 2 .8) (932.7) (932 .2) (932.1) (93 3 .9) (931.3) SEWER CLEANOUT (A) (9 3 8 .9) (9 3 7 .6) GARAGE FLOOR= (937.8) FLOOR LEVEL= (940.1) FLOOR LEVEL= (932.1) R O C K W A L K (93 7 .8) CON C R E T E APR O N (937 .6 ) ( 9 3 7 .3 ) W D . B O R D E R (937.1) (935.4) (937 .0 ) (937 .8 ) (937.8) (93 4 .9 ) (932 .9 ) X 0 .3 16 .79 FOUND SPIKE (B) (B) W A L L AN D PI L L A R S WAL K UND E R DEC K DECK (B) (C) (D) (D) (D) (D ) (F) (F) (F) (G) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) WALL & PILLARS (N) (O) (O) (O) (P) (P) (P) (O) (931.3) (93 0 .2) (929.9) (93 0 .1) 932 932 934 936 93 8 93 6 93 4 93 4 932 (Q) 9 3 2 (931.0) (930 .9 ) (931 .7 ) 9 3 1 . 5 (931.6) 93 1 .5 931 .5 932 932 (935.5) 938 936 93 4 (937 .0 ) (933.0) (936 .9 ) (935.6) (931 .7 ) (931.4) (M) (M) POINT A LINE A (E) (E) (O) (O) (O) S T E P S 938 EDGE OF WETLAND AS DELINEATED BY ANDERSON ENGINEERING OF MN (TYP) WETLAND STAKE PER ANDERSON ENGINEERING OF MN (TYP) ED G E OF DE L I N E A T E D WE T L A N D REMOVE ALL CONCRETE WALKS & GRAVEL GROUNDCOVER RESTORE TO NATURAL GRADING WITH GRASS REMOVE ALL GRAVEL GROUNDCOVER RESTORE TO GRASS ITEMS IN RED TO BE REMOVED 7 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 8 0 2 0 1 0 N W E S 0 20'40'60'80' 1 EXISTING SITE PLAN SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNRISE WINTER SOLSTICE SUNRISE SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNRISE WINTER SOLSTICE SUNRISE LAKEVIEWS RESIDENCE 2605 N. SHORE DR, ORONO, MN 55391 SHEET 6 VARIANCE SET 18 MAY 2022 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 7 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 8 0 2 0 1 0 N W E S KARL FOERSTER ORNAMENTAL GRASS NEPETA - WALKERS LOW HYDRANGEA - ANABELLE ARBORVITAE - EMERALD GREEN AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE TREE WHITESPIRE BIRCH SEE DETAIL NEXT PAGE SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNRISE WINTER SOLSTICE SUNRISE 0 20 40 60 SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNRISE WINTER SOLSTICE SUNRISE PROPOSED ASPHALT DRIVE PROPOSED CONCRETE MOTOR COURT VARIANCE SET 18 MAY 2022 VARIANCE RESUBMITTAL 7 JUNE 2022 LAKEVIEWS RESIDENCE 2605 N. SHORE DR, ORONO, MN 55391 SHEET 7 VARIANCE SET 18 MAY 2022 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 7 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 8 0 2 0 1 0 N W E S 0 10'20'30'40' EXISTING RIP-RAP TO REMAIN PAVER MOTORCOURT EXISTING TREES REMAIN WHERE POSSIBLE SUM M E R SOLS T I C E SUNR I S E WINT E R SOLS T I C E SUNR I S E SUM M E R SOLS T I C E SUNR I S E WINT E R SOLS T I C E SUNR I S E STONE PLANTER BEDS STONE RETAINING WALLS KARL FOERSTER ORNAMENTAL GRASS NEPETA - WALKERS LOW HYDRANGEA - ANABELLE ARBORVITAE - EMERALD GREEN AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE TREE WHITESPIRE BIRCH RETAINING WALL MATERIAL STONE STEPPERS PAVER & STEPPER STONE & ROCK MULCH ROCK MULCH PLANTER BEDS GRASSES IN RAISED STONE BEDS NEPETA IN FRONT OF STONE PLANTER NEPETA AND HYDRANGEA TYPICAL AT LAKESIDE PLANTING BEDS VARIANCE SET 18 MAY 2022 VARIANCE RESUBMITTAL 7 JUNE 2022 LAKEVIEWS RESIDENCE 2605 N. SHORE DR, ORONO, MN 55391 SHEET 8 VARIANCE SET 18 MAY 2022 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 7 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 8 0 2 0 1 0 N W E S 0 10'20'30'40' 1 EXISTING LANDSCAPING SUM M E R SOLS T I C E SUNR I S E WINT E R SOLS T I C E SUNR I S E SUM M E R SOLS T I C E SUNR I S E WINT E R SOLS T I C E SUNR I S E REMOVE ALL GRAVEL GROUNDCOVER VARIANCE SET 18 MAY 2022 VARIANCE RESUBMITTAL 7 JUNE 2022 LAKEVIEWS RESIDENCE 2605 N. SHORE DR, ORONO, MN 55391 SHEET 1 VARIANCE RESUBMITTAL 7 JUNE 2022 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 EXISTING (SOUTHWEST)EXISTING (SOUTHEAST) PROPOSED (SOUTHWEST)PROPOSED (SOUTHEAST) LAKEVIEWS RESIDENCE 2605 N. SHORE DR, ORONO, MN 55391 SHEET 9 VARIANCE SET 18 MAY 2022 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 17'-10 1/2"2'-9"35'-0"2'-9"42'-4 1/2"12'-6"2'-6" 115'-9" 4' - 7 1/ 2 " 20 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 4' - 0 " 3' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 36 ' - 9 " 13 ' - 9 1/ 4 " 10 0 ' - 1 3/ 4 " 8' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 5' - 6 " 7' - 9 " 5' - 7 1/ 2 " 6' - 1 0 1/ 2 " 18 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 1 0 1/ 2 " 13 ' - 7 3/ 4 " 23'-9"2'-0" 36 ' - 1 0 1/ 2 " 3' - 1 1/ 2 " 7' - 0 " 8'-0"25'-9"82'-0" 3' - 2 1/ 2 " 6' - 8 " 2' - 0 " 8'-4 1/2"2'-9"12'-7 1/2" 15'-10 1/2"9'-10 1/2"9'-4 1/2"2'-7 1/2"12'-3"42'-11"12'-4"2'-6" 4' - 7 1/ 2 " 12 ' - 9 1/ 4 " 24 ' - 1 1/ 4 " 3' - 1 1/ 2 " 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' TYP CEILING HEIGHT = 9'-0½" APPROX. SF = 3,605 FINISHED + 908 GARAGE + 660 HVAC/STORAGE + 882 PATIO + 173 COLD STOR. LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN VARIANCE RESUBMITTAL 7 JUNE 2022 LAKEVIEWS RESIDENCE 2605 N. SHORE DR, ORONO, MN 55391 SHEET 10 VARIANCE SET 18 MAY 2022 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 4' - 6 " 12 ' - 9 " 24 ' - 3 " 3' - 0 " 8'-6"2'-9"12'-9" 24'-0"2'-0" 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' 37 ' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 37 ' - 0 " 5' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 4' - 6 " 82 ' - 0 " 17 ' - 0 " 8'-0" 34 ' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 7' - 0 " 2' - 0 " 18 ' - 0 " 19 ' - 0 " 6' - 9 " 18 ' - 0 " 19 ' - 0 " 17 ' - 0 " 18'-0"2'-9"35'-0"2'-9"55'-0"2'-6" 1'-3"1'-6"35'-0"1'-3"1'-6"55'-0"1'-0" 5' - 4 " 4' - 9 1/ 4 " 10 3/ 4 " 10 3 ' - 6 " 116'-0" 8' - 1 0 " 9' - 2 " 5' - 6 " 8' - 0 " 5' - 6 " 10 ' - 1 1/ 4 " 6' - 1 0 3/ 4 " 26'-0"82'-0" 9'-3"2'-9"12'-0"27'-1"2'-9"13'-4"12'-4"2'-6" TYP CEILING HEIGHT = 9'-1⅛" APPROX. SF = 4,071 FINISHED + 962 GARAGE + 1,375 TERRACE + 370 COVERED OUTDOOR MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN VARIANCE RESUBMITTAL 7 JUNE 2022 LAKEVIEWS RESIDENCE 2605 N. SHORE DR, ORONO, MN 55391 SHEET 11 VARIANCE SET 18 MAY 2022 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 L.L. SLAB 932.5' -11'-1 1/4" M.L. SUBFLOOR 943.6' ±0" TYP ROOF BEARING +9'-1 1/8" UPPER ROOF BEARING +15'-10 3/4" M.L. SUBFLOOR 943.6' ±0" TYP ROOF BEARING +9'-1 1/8" UPPER ROOF BEARING +15'-4" L.L. SLAB 932.5' -11'-1 1/4" M.L. SUBFLOOR 943.6' ±0" TYP ROOF BEARING +9'-1 1/8" UPPER ROOF BEARING +15'-10 3/4" 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' 1 NORTH ELEVATION 3 WEST GARAGE ELEVATION 2 WEST ELEVATION VARIANCE RESUBMITTAL 7 JUNE 2022 LAKEVIEWS RESIDENCE 2605 N. SHORE DR, ORONO, MN 55391 SHEET 12 VARIANCE SET 18 MAY 2022 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 L.L. SLAB 932.5' -11'-1 1/4" M.L. SUBFLOOR 943.6' ±0" TYP ROOF BEARING +9'-1 1/8" UPPER ROOF BEARING +15'-10 3/4" 23 ' - 1 0 " BU I L D I N G HE I G H T < 30 ' - 0 " MA X . 10 ' - 0 " HIGHEST EXISTING GRADE 938.0' LOWEST GRADE 932.0' REFERENCE LINE (10' ABOVE LOWEST) ROOF DEFINED (TOP OF CORNICE) L.L. SLAB 932.5' -11'-1 1/4" M.L. SUBFLOOR 943.6' ±0" TYP ROOF BEARING +9'-1 1/8" UPPER ROOF BEARING +15'-10 3/4" L.L. SLAB 932.5' -11'-1 1/4" M.L. SUBFLOOR 943.6' ±0" TYP ROOF BEARING +9'-1 1/8" 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' 1 SOUTH ELEVATION 2 EAST ELEVATION 3 EAST HIDDEN VARIANCE RESUBMITTAL 7 JUNE 2022 Date Application Received: May 18, 2022 Date Application Considered as Complete: June 7, 2022 60-Day Review Period Expires: August 6, 2022 To: Chair McCutcheon and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Laura Oakden, Interim Community Development Director Date: 21 June 2022 Subject: LA22-000028, Eskuche Design, 2605 North Shore Drive, Variances, Public Hearing Background This is a unique property in that an inlet from Lake Minnetonka encroaches into the lot, establishing an additional 75 lake yard into the side of the property. The applicant is proposing to build a new home, replacing the existing structure. The existing home sits forward of the 75’ lakeyard setback, about 18 feet from the Lake Minnetonka and 50 feet from the inlet. The applicant proposes the new home further back away from the lakeshore, 36.5 feet from the Lake, and 53 feet from the inlet. The proposal includes the removal of hardcover on the west and south sides of the property. To minimize the inlet encroachment, the applicant proposes to move the home closer to the east side property line, into the east side yard setback. The applicant has worked to design the home to try and improve the current setbacks and maintain some of the same footprint of the existing home. The proposal includes new expansions with the house and hardcover within the 75’ lake yard. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) was contacted regarding the proposed house floor elevations. The proposed survey notes a low opening at the storage and lower garage at 925.5. MCWD noted they require the lowest opening of the house must be 933.5. This information was shared with the applicant. MCWD will complete a review at time of permitting. The application depicts a new location for entrance monuments. The property currently has entrance monuments that can be maintained. New entrance monuments in new a location would require them to come into conformance with the city code. The applicant is suggesting a 5 foot setback from the edge of the wetland where 25’ is required. Application Summary: The applicant is requesting the following variances: • Hardcover in the 75’ lakeyard • Buildings in the 75’ lakeyard • Retaining walls in the 75’ lakeyard • Side yard setback • Lot area • Wetland setback for the proposed entrance monuments. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the proposed hardcover, building, retaining walls in the 75’ lakeyard, side yard setback and lot area variances. Staff does not support the wetland setback for the proposed entrance monuments. LA22-000028 June 21 2022 Page 2 of 7 A variance application was approved for a new home in 2019 (LA19-000049). That application has expired. The new home is asking for similar variances. The 2019 home was approved for a 19’ side yard setback, today’s application is proposing a 21’ side yard setback. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicants Submittal information: The applicant has identified the unique existing lakeshore and inlet lake yard as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance. Additionally, they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds the inlet is a practical difficulty supporting variances, and notes the applicant is working to improve the site by working within the existing building footprint and massing of the proposed home. The new home is further from the lakeshore compared to the existing home. The applicant is also reducing the overall hardcover of the property. Due to the location of the existing home in the lakeyard, grading will need to be done to remove the existing home and restore the lawn and for the new proposed Staff finds the wetland buffer setback variance a convenience and not necessary for the use of the property. Staff does not support the wetland buffer setback variance request for new entrance monuments. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-305 - Building Setbacks: DISTRICT LR-1A Required Existing Proposed Street 50’ Roughly 290’ Roughly 240’ Side (west) 30’ 91’ 95’ Side (east) 30’ 24’ 21’ Lakeshore (main) 75’ 18’ 36.5’ Lakeshore (inlet) 75’ Roughly 50’ Roughly 53’ Average Lakeshore The building will meet the ALS. The proposed walls are shown to be within the 42” height allowance from the existing grade. This setback is met. Section 78-1605 – Wetland Setback/ Entrance Monuments DISTRICT LR-1A Required Existing Proposed Wetland Setback 25’ 6’ 5’ (New location) • The applicant is able to maintain what they have, but the new proposed entrance monuments are considered new encroachments within this setback. Section 78- 305 - Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2 acres) 200’ Actual 81,213 s.f. (1.86 acre) 230’ @ OHWL LA22-000028 June 21 2022 Page 3 of 7 Section 78-1403- Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 81,213 s.f. (1.86 acre) Allowed: 16,242.6 s.f. (20%) Existing: 3,868 s.f. (4%) Proposed: 5,696 s.f. (7%) Section 78-1680 - Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Tier Total Area in Zone Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier 1 81,213 s.f 20,303 s.f. (25 %) 17,353 s.f. (21.37%) 14,061 s.f. (16.79 %) Applicable Regulations: Lot Area and Side Setback Variance (78-305 & 78-72) The zoning district requires a lot to be 2 acre and have a 30’ side yard setback. The property is 1.86 acres in size, substandard to the zoning district. The property is unique due to the inlet of Lake Minnetonka and substandard size creating a limited building envelope. Zoning Code Section 78-72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard properties within the Shoreland Overlay District, like the subject lot, are able to be redeveloped without variances if specific standards are met; such as: 1. All setback requirements can be met; Not Met 2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer; and 3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 25 percent of the entire lot area. Met 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. Met The applicants request for additional variances results in the property’s inability to conform to all of the standards above. Therefore, lot area variances are required in order to redevelop the property. The ability to develop the property consistent with other existing developed properties in the neighborhood would be limited if the area and width variances are not granted. Buildings and retaining walls in the 75’ Lakeshore (78-1279) No building or retaining walls are permitting within the 75’ lakeshore setback. The existing home sits almost entirely within the 75’ lakeyard setback. The new home will take advantage of the existing homes footprint and massing. The retaining walls will establish some usable lawn space along the side of the home. Retaining walls are also shown within the 75’ lakeshore along the front/lakeside of the home. Some of the walls will sit in the same footprint and the existing deck. Some of the wall are proposed to support the driveway and some proposed walls will be used to create the patio/terrace area. LA22-000028 June 21 2022 Page 4 of 7 The new home is proposed to meet average lakeshore setback but the building will encroach into the 75’ setback along the eastern and western edge of the home due to the property being almost entirely surrounded by lakeshore. Roughly 880 sq.ft. of the 5349 sq.ft new home is located outside of the existing massing and is a new encroachment in the 75’ setback. Hardcover in the 75’ Lakeshore (78-1680) The property allowed 25% total hardcover. No hardcover is permitted within the 75’ lakeshore setbacks. The exiting home covers over 21% of the lot in hardcover the new proposed home will decrease the overall hardcover to 16.79%. The meeting the overall hardcover requirements. Within the 75’ lakeyard setback; the new home is proposing a new deck/ terrace which takes advantage of the existing patio footprint. The application will be removing the large existing driveway and reconfigure the access to the house. The new driveway will take advantage of the existing location but will reduce the overall driveway size. The new hardcover and building encroachments are considered new hardcover within the lakeshore setback. Wetland Buffer Setback (78-1605) Where the MCWD does not require a buffer, a 25 foot setback shall be required between the edge of all wetlands from any building (principal or accessory) or other structure, septic systems, or wells. The wetland edge shall be determined as required in section 78-1604 of this Code. The applicant did not submit a wetland delineation or any findings that a buffer was established through MCWD. The 25 foot setback buffer is a required setback for the site. The current entrance monuments are nonconforming at roughly 6’ from the edge of wetland. These improvements can be maintained but not expanded in any way. The applicant is proposing new monuments in a different location roughly 5’ from the edge of wetland. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: LA22-000028 June 21 2022 Page 5 of 7 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed variances are in harmony with the intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The goal of the ordinance is to reduce or eliminate improvements in the lake yard, the proposal shifts away from the lake yard as much as practical. The new entrance monuments are not in harmony with the ordinance to prevent improvements within the wetland buffer. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variances to develop a nonconforming lot of record are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of the home on the substandard lot, in the proposed location within the lake, and side yard setbacks, appears to be reasonable as the property’s reduced size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore. The hardcover and retaining walls proposed within the lake yard appear to be reasonable. The entrance monuments are permitted by the city code but the proposed location is not reasonable within the wetland buffer. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The lake and its inlet limit the building envelope for the property. The surrounding lakeshore is unique property feature of the lane and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances are requested in order to permit construction of a home designed to fit the character of the neighborhood according to the submitted information. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the LR-1A District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property’s substandard size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore creates difficulties which may also apply to properties in the same neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The property’s substandard size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore creates difficulties which may also apply to properties in the same neighborhood. However, the location of the lake surrounding the building envelope is very unique to this property. LA22-000028 June 21 2022 Page 6 of 7 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Granting a lot area, side yard and lake setback variances are necessary for the preservation of the property right of the application. The retaining walls and hardcover in the lakeyard variances facilitate the use of the property for the new home and are necessary for the preservation of the property. The wetland buffer setback variance for the new entrance monuments are not necessary for the enjoyment and use of the property. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variances do not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant. The variances are necessary as the property has considerable practical difficulties affecting development. The wetland buffer setback for entrance monuments are accessory structures to the principle building and granting this variance is a convenience and not necessary for the use of the property. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. A review of the new home will be completed when a building permit is submitted. Public Comments The applicant submitted two neighbor signatures for the project. It is included as Exhibit G. Issues for Consideration 1. Are the new entrance monuments necessary for the use of the lot? 2. Are the 75’ lakeyard improvements reasonable for the site? 3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends denial of the proposed wetland setback for the new entrance monuments as the practical difficulty standards are not met. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application and Narrative Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Survey and Site Plans Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. 2019 PC memo and Approved Resolution Planning Staff recommends approval of the proposed variances for hardcover, building, and retaining walls in the 75’ lakeyard, side yard setback and lot area for construction of a new house. LA22-000028 June 21 2022 Page 7 of 7 Exhibit G. Neighbor’s Comments Exhibit H. Property Owners List and Map AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: L. Oakden Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By 1.Purpose. The applicants are requesting lot width variances for both lots with the goal of a boundary line adjustment. 2.Background. Ressler and Plachecki are neighboring property owners at 3683 and 3685 North Shore Drive. The applicants are looking to complete an administrative boundary line adjustment (officially called a Subdivision Exception) which can be completed by staff and recorded by the owner. Moving the property boundary is a staff administrative action as long as no new non-conformities are created or an existing non-conformity is not increased. The requested variance, if granted, would allow the City to administratively adjust the boundary line. Each property will require a lot width variance in order to allow the boundary line adjustment. Lot width is measured in 2 places on lakeshore properties, at the ordinary high water level (OHWL) and at the 75’ lakeyard setback. Properties in the LR-1C district require 100’ lot width. Similar to other nearby properties, both of these lake-front properties are nonconforming to lot width, area and setbacks. Due to the angle of the proposed lot line, the lot width will decrease at the 75’ lakeyard setback from 54’ to 52’ at 3683 North Shore Drive and at 3685 North Shore Drive it will decrease from 92’ to 82’ at the OHWL. The new property boundary will maintain the same lot areas overall. Most relevant to the City Council’s consideration, the proposed new property line will improve many non- conformities on the both parcels. The building setback, overall hardcover and lot width at the OHWL will improve for 3683 North Shore Drive and the new property line will be move off of the existing driveway bringing the driveway setback closer to conformance for 3685 North Shore Drive. These results will, therefore, further the goals of protecting against overcrowding at the lakeshore in this zoning district and lessen difficulties created by historical development in the neighborhood. Furthermore, the decrease in hardcover at 3683 North Shore Drive serves to mitigate the impacts of hardcover runoff and improve storm water management in the area. 3.15.99 Deadline. The application was complete on May 5, 2022. The 60 Review Period expires July 2, 2022. 4.Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On May 16, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. The commission reviewed the application and discussed support for the application. They noted the improvement to the hardcover calculations and building setbacks were important improvements to the sites. No comments were made during the public hearing. The commission voted 7 to 0 to approve the lot width variances for both properties. 5.Public Comment. No comments from the public have been received 6.Staff Recommendation. Staff finds there are some practical difficulties to support the lot width variance request. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Discuss and provide direction for staff to draft a resolution. Item No.: 7 Date: June 27, 2022 Item Description: LA22-000017, Jon Ressler and Frank Plachecki, 3683 North Shore Drive and 3685 North Shore Drive, Lot Width Variance for both properties Presenter: Laura Oakden Planner Agenda Section: Zoning Report Exhibits A. Staff Annotated Survey and Submitted Survey B. Hardcover Calculations C. Images D. PC Staff Report E. PC Minutes 5.16.22 References PC Exhibits A. Application & Narrative B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form C. Proposed Survey and Survey Annotated by Staff D. Existing and Proposed Hardcover Calculations E. Aerial Photos F. Property Owners List and Map Date Application Received: 04/01/2022 Date Application Considered as Complete: 05/03/2022 60-Day Review Period Expires: 07/02/2022 To: Chair McCutcheon and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Laura Oakden, Planner LLO Date: May 16, 2022 Subject: #LA22-000017, Jon Ressler and Frank Plachecki, 3683 North Shore Drive (Ressler) + 3685 North Shore Drive (Plachecki), Lot Width Variance for both properties, Public Hearing Background Ressler and Plachecki are neighboring property owners at 3683 and 3685 North Shore Drive. The applicants are looking to complete an administrative boundary line adjustment (officially called a Subdivision Exception) which can be completed by staff and recorded by the owner. Moving the property boundary is a staff administrative action as long as no new non-conformities are created or an existing non-conformity is not increased. Each property will require a lot width variance for in order to allow the boundary line adjustment. Lot width is measured in 2 places on lakeshore properties, at the ordinary high water level (OHWL) and at the 75’ lakeyard setback. Properties in the LR-1C district require 100’ lot width. Both properties are nonconforming to lot width, area and setbacks. Due to the angle of the proposed lot line, the lot width will decrease at the 75’ lakeyard setback from 54’ to 52’ at 3683 (Ressler) and at 3685 (Plachecki) it will decrease from 92’ to 82’ at the OHWL. The new property boundary will maintain the same lot area sizes. The proposed new property line will improve many non-conformities on the both parcels. The building setback, overall hardcover and lot width at the OHWL will improve for 3683 (Ressler) and the new property line will be move off of the existing driveway bringing the driveway setback closer to conformance for 3685 (Plachecki). Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has primarily identified the existing conditions and the improvement of many nonconforming to the city codes for each property as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance lot width variances and boundary line adjustment. Additionally, they have provided their supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds that the proposed lot line adjustment improving existing nonconformities on hardcover, building setbacks, driveway setbacks is a positive improvement. The lot width variance requested may be supported by practical difficulty as an improvement from the existing condition. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350 – Building/Improvement Setbacks: The proposed lot line adjustment will improve the existing nonconforming building setbacks (in green). Application Summary: With the goal of a boundary line adjustment, the applicants are requesting lot width variances for both lots Staff Recommendation: Staff finds there are some practical difficulties to support the lot width variance request. FILE # LA22-000017 16 May 2022 Page 2 of 4 3683 (Ressler) DISTRICT LR-1C Required Existing Proposed West Side (Proposed to be moved) 7.5’ 3.2’ 6.2’ Side (East) 7.5’ 4’ No Change Driveway 5’ 6.5’ 5’ Lakeshore 75’ 37’ No Change 3685 (Plachecki) DISTRICT LR-1C Required Existing Proposed East Side (Proposed to be moved) 9.2’ 11’ 13’ West Side 9.2’ 25’ No Change Driveway 5’ located across the property boundary 2.5’ Lakeshore 75’ 35’ No Change Section 78-350 – Lot Area/Width: Based on the proposed lot ling adjustment, the currently nonconforming-lot width will improve on 3683 at the OHWL (in green). The lot width will become narrower at the 75’ on 3683 and at the OHWL on 3685 (In red). Property Required Existing Proposed 3683 (Ressler) 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100’ @ OHEL 100’ @ 75’ lakyard 7,989 Sq. Ft (0.16 AC) 53’ @ OHWL 54’ @ 75’ lakeyard 7,989 Sq. Ft (0.16 AC) No Change 63’ @ OHWL 52’ @ 75’ lakeyard 3685 (Plachecki) 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100’ @ OHEL 100’ @ 75’ lakyard 18,269 Sq. Ft (0.41 AC) 92’ @ OHWL 171’ @ 75’ lakeyard 18,269 Sq. Ft (0.41 AC) No Change 82’ @ OHWL 173’ @ 75’ lakeyard Section 78-1403 – Structural Building Coverage: The structural coverage on each lot will not change as the lot area size is not proposed to change with no new improvements proposed. Section 78-1680– Hardcover Calculations: Based on the proposed lot ling adjustment, the current nonconforming hardcover will improve on 3683 (in green). Property Existing Proposed 3683 (Ressler) 3,130 sq.ft. (39.18%) 3,073 sq.ft. (38.47%) 3685 (Plachecki) 3,539 sq.ft (19.37) 3,596 sq.ft (19.68%) Applicable Regulations: Lot Width Variance (78-350) While lot with at the OHWL is improving from 53’ to 63’ on 3683, lot widh variances are required for both lots due to the more narrow width at the 75’ setback on 3683 going from 54’ to 52’ and the OHWL on 3685 going from 92’ to 82’. Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of FILE # LA22-000017 16 May 2022 Page 3 of 4 circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth- sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The intent of the ordinance is to establish minimum lot sizes and protect against overcrowding at the lakeshore. The proposed variances does not negatively impact those goals. The applicants’ proposal would serve to improve some existing nonconformities in the substandard lot widths, hardcover and building setback orientation. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The use of the property for single family residential is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to realign the shared property line between two nonconforming lots improves nonconforming lot width, hardcover and building setback as applied to for the adjacent properties. The use of the property is established with the existing homes on the properties. The variance does not impact this use. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The unique shape, size, and orientation of the subject properties present challenges. The properties have been developed over time not exclusively by the property owners. The proposed boundary line adjustment follows the historic development pattern. The suggested reallocation of property would result in more improved nonconforming city codes on the property bringing the property closer to conformance for the neighborhood. There should be consideration for variance approvals from the lot width as the applicants are proposing improvements on both lots. c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The lots are both nonconforming as they pertain to lot width. Altering the lot line between the parcels improves the lot width as one point of measurement but increase the nonconformity at another point of measurement creating an even trade between the two nonconforming parcels, so there is little impact to the character of the area. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a single family home is allowed in the LR-1C District for properties which meet the minimum requirements. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two- family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. FILE # LA22-000017 16 May 2022 Page 4 of 4 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The applicants propose changes to the lot line bring many substandard requirements closer to conformance which that is unique to the subject properties. The lot width limitations is not unique to the applicants’ properties. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The substandard lot width is not unique to the immediate neighborhood. The applicants wish to bring many substandard conditions closer to conformance of the city code. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The property owners indicate that the property has historically been maintained and granting the lot width variances to allow a lot line adjustment follows how the properties have been used which will better protect the rights of the property owners. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. The granting of a lot width variance standard to permit boundary line adjustment on undersized properties is not in conflict with the intent of the comprehensive plan and zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The applicants has stated the variances are necessary due to the historic use and maintain of the properties and this action is not a convenience. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments No comments from the public have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owners proposes to use the properties in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff finds there are practical difficulties to support the lot width variances to allow a property line adjustment. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application & Narrative Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Proposed Survey and Survey Annotated by Staff Exhibit D. Existing and Proposed Hardcover Calculations Exhibit E. Aerial Photos Exhibit F. Property Owners List and Map MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, May 16, 2022 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ ROLL CALL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Chair Mark McCutcheon, Vice Chair Scott Kirchner, Commissioners Chris Bollis, Dennis Libby, Jon Ressler, Bob Erickson, and Alternate Dave Peterson. Commissioner Matt Gettman was absent. Representing Staff were Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart, City Planner Melanie Curtis, and City Planner Laura Oakden. 1. LA22-000017 JON RESSLER, 3683 & 3685 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, REQUESTS A LOT WIDTH VARIANCES AS PART OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN THE TWO PROPERTIES. (STAFF: LAURA OAKDEN) Commissioner Ressler is part of the application and recused himself. He stepped away from his seat. Jon Ressler and Frank Plachecki, Applicants, were present. City Planner Oakden noted Ressler and Plachecki are neighboring property owners at 3683 and 3685 North Shore Drive. The Applicants are looking to complete an administrative boundary line. Moving the property boundary is a staff administrative action as long as no new non-conformities are created or an existing non-conformity is not increased. Each property will require a lot width variance in order to allow the boundary line adjustment and the existing lot width non-conformity will increase. Lot width is measured in 2 places on lakeshore properties, at the ordinary high water level (OHWL) and at the 75 foot lakeyard setback. Properties in the LR-1C district require 100 foot lot width. Both properties are nonconforming to lot width, area and setbacks. Due to the angle of the proposed lot line, the lot width will decrease at the 75 foot lakeyard setback from 54 feet to 52 feet at 3683 (the smaller property on screen) and at 3685 the lot width will decrease from 92 feet to 82 feet at the OHWL. The new property boundary will maintain the same lot area sizes. Oakden stated the new property line will improve many of the non- conformities on the both parcels. The building setback, overall hardcover, and lot width at the OHWL will improve on the smaller property; currently all of those are non-conforming and all will improve and come closer to the City Code. The new property line will move off the existing driveway bringing the driveway setback closer to conformance for 3685 North Shore Drive. Oakden showed a slide on screen showing the proposed adjustments. The Applicant has primarily identified the existing conditions and the improvement of many non-conformities to the city Codes for each property as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance lot width variances and boundary line adjustment. Additionally, they have provided their supporting documentation regarding practical difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Staff finds that the proposed lot line adjustment improving existing non-conformities on hardcover, building setbacks, and driveway setbacks is a positive improvement. The lot width variance requested may be supported by practical difficulty. Staff finds there may be some practical difficulties to support that lot width variance. Jon Ressler, 3683 North Shore Drive, stated the reason for this application is to apply how the property has been used in practice for over three decades. Chair McCutcheon opened the public hearing at 6:10 p.m. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, May 16, 2022 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Chair McCutcheon closed the public hearing at 6:10 p.m. Kirchner stated it seems that there are slight improvements to hardcover and he does not have a lot of issues with the application. Bollis sees that it is clearing up an issue as far as how the properties have been used. He agrees that part of it is getting smaller and the other getting bigger. The reduced hardcover and setback getting better in places is helpful. McCutcheon thinks they are improving the situation with items that Staff highlighted, plus thirty years is a long time and they are correcting something, especially when there is agreement from both neighbors. Kirchner moved, Libby seconded, to approve LA22-000017, 3683 & 3685 North Shore Drive, Lot Width Variances as part of an Administrative Boundary Line Adjustment Between the two properties. VOTE: Ayes: 7, Nays 0. AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain council approval to commence construction designs for the Navarre Municipal Parking Lot. 2. Background. Previous work includes a public engagement process and a feasibility report. Through the summer of 2021 the City Community Development with consultant support from Bolton and Menk (BMI) completed a public engagement process with the Navarre area to evaluate possible improvements to the Navarre Parking lot (Report at Exhibit A). Based on the feedback form the public engagement the City with BMI completed a feasibility study for the project to establish key elements and an initial cost estimate for the parking lot improvement (Layout at Exhibit B). 3. Scope. The engineering services will consist of detailed design of the parking lot including: survey, concrete islands, lighting, storm sewer system and pavement marking. 4. Cost. Bolton and Menk (BMI) has provided a scope of services for a fee estimate not to exceed $42,750 (Exhibit B). Item Vendor Cost Remarks Navarre Parking Lot Design BMI $ 42,750 Proposed Not to exceed Construction TBD $ 310,000 Predesign Estimate Construction Management TBD $ 20,000 Estimate TOTAL $ 372,750 Estimate 5. Funding. The engineering as well as the eventual project will be funded with a combination of the funding sources. During the CIP process this project was identified to be primarily funded from the Community investment fund. However the increase in scope combined with increasing construction costs have resulted a need to look to other funding sources. Staff is currently recommending using the PIR fund for a portion of the construction expenses. The PIR fund however must be paid back over time. Fund Cost Estimate Remarks Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund $ 172,625 Must be paid back overtime from other funds such as the pavement improvement fund. Community Investment Fund $ 125,000 Additional funds may be available here once the CSAH 112 PH project cost share is finalized. Stormwater Fund $ 75,125 Total $372,750 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Move to direct the City Engineer to move forward with engineering and design for the Navarre parking lot Project and acceptance of the Bolton and Menk’s proposal for design. Exhibits A. Public Engagement Report B. Feasibility plan and Bolton and Menk Design Proposal. Item No.: 9 Date: June 27, 2022 Item Description: Navarre Parking Lot Design (Project #21-040) Presenter: Adam T. Edwards City Administrator/City Engineer Agenda Section: Zoning Report H:\ORNO\0C1124788\1_Corres\E_Public Engagement\3_Open Houses_Meetings_Events\2020-09-XX Open House\Summary\Navarre Engagement Summary 09292021.docx October 12, 2021 Jeremy Barnhart RE: Navarre Municipal Parking Lot Community Engagement City of Orono The Navarre Area municipal parking lot, located near the intersection of Shadywood Road and Shoreline Drive requires repair due to aging asphalt and poor surface conditions. Additionally, the comprehensive plan identified this parking lot as a future space for community events. The City of Orono’s council requested staff conduct engagement efforts to ensure future investments in the parking lot meet community needs. Bolton & Menk was retained through the service agreement to complete these efforts. This memo and its attachments detail the efforts completed and the participants’ responses. Efforts Multiple marketing and engagement strategies were implemented to solicit feedback from the public and surrounding businesses. Three events were held: •Virtual Open House. The City of Orono’s website hosted a virtual open house which included information about the project and a brief survey. As part of the virtual open house, a virtual listening session was held on August 12th, 2021 at 7 PM. There were seven participants. •Pop Up in the Parking Lot. On August 17 th, 2021 from 4 PM to 7 PM, a pop up public input opportunity was held in the Navarre municipal parking lot. At this meeting, users of the parking lot were able to make brief comments about the parking lot and changes they would like to see and complete a sticker exercise to identify types of improvements. Eleven people signed in with dozens more providing comments as passersby. •Business Focus Group. On September 14th, 2021 at 2 PM, a virtual focus group was held with two business owners (Narrows Saloon and Ace Hardware). To invite community members to the engagement events, multiple marketing materials were developed and circulated: •Postcards were sent to property owners and tenants in advance of the virtual open house, listening session and pop up. •Postcards were sent to business owners to invite them to the virtual open house and business focus group. Due to lack of response, a follow up letter was sent by City Staff and a nother postcard was sent after a date was selected. •A press release was published on the City of Orono’s website to invite the broader community to participate. Results Survey (Online, combined with Pop -Up) The online survey was published to collect comments from the community about the future of the lot. This five-question survey asked respondents what type of community events they would like to see take place in the space, what features they would like to see in this parking lot, what could make the lot more functional and if there was anything else we should know about the parking lot. If respondents wanted to stay updated with the project as it progresses, they could enter their email at the end of the survey. As of September 2nd, 2021, this survey had received 104 responses. The results are summarized below. Question 1. “The comprehensive plan identified the municipal parking lot as a future space for community events. What type of events do you feel would be most important here?” Support for a future farmer’s market at the site was highest, with 76% of the respondents supporting one at the lot. Community festivals and art fairs were next, each receiving support from about half of the respondents. Car shows received support from about 20% of respond ents. There were an additional 18 write-in responses with answers, including the addition of a pickleball court and a request that nothing be done to the lot. Figure 1 shows the survey results for question 1. The complete answers can be found in Appendix A. Figure 1. Responses to “The comprehensive plan identified the municipal parking lot as a future space for community events. What type of events do you feel would be most important here?” Question 2. What type of features would you like to see in this parking lot? Select all that apply. A list of 12 features that could be added to the parking lot were provided to respondents. Flexible space was the most common feature requested, with 73% of respondents requesting it. Lighting was next at 67%, followed by natural plantings and trash bins and dumpster enclosures. This question was also asked at the pop-up event. The most popular features at the event, like with the online survey, were lighting and flexible space. Figure 2 shows the survey results for question 2 and Figure 3 shows the results to the same question from the pop-up in the parking lot. 77 52 18 47 18 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Farmers Market Community Festivals/Block Parties Car Shows Art Fairs Other # of Responses Figure 2. Responses to “What type of features would you like to see in this parking lot? Select all that apply.” Figure 3. Responses to “What type of features would you like to see in this parking lot?” from the pop-up in the parking lot. Question 3. What type of features would you like to see in this parking lot? Select all that apply. – comments. Question 3 was the write in comments section about the multiple -choice question 2. These comments varied widely in topic, opinion, and tone, but they could be categorized into four broad sections: nature related, renovation/re-striping, events, and other. Natural plantings and shade trees were popular responses, and many people wanted to re-stripe the parking lot. Other responses varied from support of the project to opposition of doing anything to change the current uses of the parking lot. The full list o f responses can be found in Appendix B. 68 63 55 47 34 32 29 20 14 13 9 7 6 11 3 4 3 0 3 3 2 2 4 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 F l e x i b l e S p a c e L i g h t i n g N a t u r a l P l a n t i n g s T r a s h B i n s a n d D u m p s t e r E n c l o s u r e s P e d e s t r i a n W a l k w a y s P e r m e a b l e P a v e r s E l e c t r i c V e h i c l e C h a r g i n g S t a t i o n s P a r k l e t s a n d S e a t i n g A r t a n d M u r a l s S h a d e S t r u c t u r e s T r a f f i c C a l m i n g I n t e r p r e t i v e S i g n a g e Survey Pop-Up Question 4. Are there other changes the city could consider making to make this lot more functional? This was the second write-in question posed to the respondents of the online survey. Over half (53) of all survey respondents answered this question. Similarly, to question 3 the comments were a wide variety of topics, opinions, and tones. Responses varied from simple maintenance requests, like re -striping or hiding dumpsters better, to larger projects like leveling the land and improving drainage systems or building a multi-level parking garage. Many comments were parking related, but several comments were about natural features like trees and greenspace. The full list of comments is available in Appendix C. Question 5. Is there anything else we should know about this parking lot? Question 5 was the third write-in question and was a space for more general comments about the parking lot. Forty responses were received for this question from the online survey. Comments a re lumped into three main categories: business related, maintenance/renovation, and other. Business related comments mostly spoke to how there was not enough parking dedicated to the businesses at the shopping center. Maintenance and renovation ideas vari ed from restriping the site to adding parking capacity through multiple means, including building retaining walls to create more space and having nearby houses give up some of their property to the lot. The full list of these comments is available in Appendix D. Virtual Listening Session The listening session was held online and asked participants their thoughts on what improvements are necessary for the parking lot. Items discussed include: • Concerns about the aesthetics of the parking lot, specificall y the private property owner to the west and enforcing current standards for all businesses ; garbage screening; bury utilities; more plantings, greenery, and tree shade • Future functionality including EV charging stations or preparing for them in the future by burying the conduit; incorporating future events, even if the events happened at the nearby park and closed Lyric Avenue • Multimodal accommodations including pedestrian connections to the Metro Transit station; improvements for the K-12 bus stop waiting; trail head parking with bicycle and pedestrian facilities, including bike parking Pop Up in the Parking Lot In addition to the online survey, a pop -up event was held in the parking lot. At this event, comments were collected to gauge feedback on wh at should be done with the space. The answers, like with the online survey, were all varied. Many commented that they wanted to see maintenance and renovations done, while others offered general comments about the current conditions in the parking lot. The full list of these comments can be found in Appendix E. Business Focus Group A focus group with the Narrows Saloon and Ace Hardware provided insight on these businesses’ needs and operations as they relate to the parking lot. Generally, these businesses would like to see the parking lot spruced up and potentially expanded, with improved lighting. They recommended evaluating the underground utilities after a series of water issues in previous years, to ensure improvements minimize disruption to their busin esses. Other items discussed include: • These businesses noted any changes to the parking lot needs to consider truck delivery and minimize the barriers trucks would need to navigate. • Spaces are not full depth so that creates drive lan e challenges, especially with large vehicles. With the new regional bicycle trail connection, increasing numbers of vehicles have additional bicycle trailers, which increases their overhang into the drive lane. • Consider ways to reduce/minimize impacts from using the lot as a shu ttle lot because it reduces the flexibility and availability of parking for surrounding businesses. • If there are opportunities to expand the lot, the city should consider it , but limit maintenance and find the most cost-effective solutions. • The parking lot could use some aesthetic improvements. Summary The feedback received regarding the future of the Navarre municipal parking lot was varied, however multiple ideas were more favored than others. These themes and ideas are summarized below into five categories, with descriptions and order of magnitude cos t/effort estimates. Item Description/Notes Cost and Effort Su r f a c e a n d S t r i p i n g Resurface and restripe existing parking Ensure full width stalls, accessible parking spaces marked and signed $ Resurface and stripe angle parking Will increase parking stalls without major construction cost $ Install raised curbs at end of parking rows, include natural plantings Define parking lanes can help reduce cut through traffic $$ Review/modify accesses into/out of lot Directional drive lanes and access modifications can slow traffic and make accessing the lot safer $$ Regrade and resurface, stripe angle parking Regrading will reduce existing water and ice issues $$$ Square off parking lot in northwest corner, install retaining wall, plantings, and high quality trees Expanding parking lot will make flex space more compatible with existing businesses $$$ Li g h t i n g a n d E V Ch a r g i n g Install conduit Installing conduit will allow for minimal disruptions to the lot when lighting and EV charging station installation occurs $ Install LED lighting Lighting poles provide opportunities to incorporate Navarre area/Orono branding and placemaking $$ Install 3-5 EV charging stations Look for opportunities to partner with energy companies, private companies to minimize city’s cost $$ Mu l t i m o d a l A m e n i t i e s Install bicycle parking Racks should allow frame and wheel to make contact. Can evaluate custom racks to incorporate branding/placemaking. $ Install pedestrian walkways Connect the park and regional trail to the businesses, providing dedicated pedestrian space through the $ Install pedestrian amenities (benches, trash) and/or parklet on the north end of lot Provide amenities for people as they wait for the bus, use the park/trail, patronize businesses $$ Install temporary speed humps Temporary speed humps provide traffic calming while not impeding snow removal $$ La n d U s e Work with property owners to incorporate garbage screening and meet current codes Continue code enforcement as necessary $ Consider grants to improve buildings Matching grants to property owners can encourage them to improve facades, walkways, and other general aesthetics, making Navarre a more successful area $$$ Ut i l i z a t i o n Flex space and event permitting Allow organizers use of the northwest corner of the parking lot through an event permit, only at low demand times $ Require staff to park on the west/northwest area of the parking lot Prime spaces should be saved for patrons to encourage higher turnover rates $ Complete utilization/turnover study Study can better inform who is using the lot, for how long and whether additional parking management strategies are necessary $ Evaluate parking management strategies to reduce use as a shuttle lot Options may include permitting/ enforcement; pay parking after 2 or 4 hours $ H:\ORNO\0C1124788\1_Corres\E_Public Engagement\3_Open Houses_Meetings_Events\2020-09-XX Open House\Summary\Navarre Engagement Summary 09292021.docx Appendix A Question 1 – Write In • None of those. Too much commotion and noise for those of us that live nearby. • Concerts • Family Activities, Outdoor Meeting Space, Fountains and Sculptures • I think the above are good ideas, but most take more management and logistics than people realize and I'm not sore there is a community bene fit. Car show is probably a fit as they are typically nights and weekends and don't effect the businesses adjacent. Seems like letting the restaurants use the majority of the lot for free is an issue that needs to be address. They should probably pay for larking and a percentage of the maintenance as they cause the wear and tear and the benefit financially. • Keep boat and bus partaking out • Keep it simple-just parking • Misc themed fun • None! Seems like a horrible place for all these ideas • None, because if you take away the parking they won't be able to attend.what will happen to the 7-days-a-week businesses if you turn this into a one weekend per month fairground? Excelsior, Wayzata and Mound have substantial parking. Navarre has one lot that is often near full. • Not enough parking for events • Pickleball court • Resurface and stripping only • See comments • Splash pad for families/kids. Would go great with the park nearby. • Traditional parking lot…keep it simple • Parking • re-pave and stripe for parking Appendix B Question 3 - Write-in Answers • Natural plantings will end up weeds. The picture example looks unkempt. And no ground art! Keep the children across the street in the playground. • If you do a farmers market or outdoor music or art festival then where do people park for that ? Plantings near the basement doors under lulus and lakeshore interiors could spruce up that end of the parking lot • Maximize parking and beautify by cutting into embankment on west and northwest, adding retaining wall and plantings. That slope is difficult to mow, never looks good and collects trash. A number of the social events suggested have in the past, and could again in the future , utilize the adjacent park space and the street between the park and the parking lot. This lot fills up now and really nees to maximize the parking space as its primary function. • It would be nice to somehow tie it into the nearby playground and convey the natural beauty of the area and of Lake Minnetonka. Navarre could use a good gathering place such as Wayzata's new boardwalk with fountains, greenery and such. • Incorporate with the park next door—maybe the plantings and seating can be in combination. • flexible space natural plantings • 1. I would rather have "natural shade" in the forms of trees, rather than man -made shade structures. 2. EV charging (TESLA supercharging!) would be great since those individuals need to "hang out" for a time. 3. A decorative low "wall" (or consistent landscaping) around the exterior would better mark the area. We could tie in the municipal lot with Lunds and Byerlys if the "wall" were copied around their parking lot by the sidewalk. Navarre largely lacks a cohesive look, or a unifying theme. 4. More trees and landscaping, please. • Seriously. The Navarre area does not need any farmer's market s, etc. The parking area should remain for parking and yet, it should be beautified with all of the boxes I checked previously. The markets are in Mound along with the gardens, etc. I would like to see a ton of year 'round gorgeous landscaping and Christmas lights. • not many curbs due to snow plowing. no pavers because they chip and crack and with the slope of the Parking Lot they would get filled with debris. • I think if you resurface and do the striping ---it would then be perfect. Trying to beautify the parking lot would take away from the atmosphere of the area and be an expense the citizens do not need. A small farmers market once a week would be OK but not necessary as there are many other farmers markets close by. Lund's and Byerly's do not nee d additional produce to compete with and we do not want to lose our convenient grocery store. • None of the above. Simple, reconstruct of existing. • Permeable paving is good if it will stand up to cars turning tight corners. • Resurface and striped parking. • Good painting stipes to delineate car spaces is a preference. • This lot is an open canvas and should be a one and done vision from the city. A 2 level lot for part of the lot with an open area to be used for community event. Lots of plantings, dumps ter enclosures and electric charging are a few improvements that need to be done • Resurfacing and orderly striping is enough! The backs of the buildings are very unsightly and if they were upgraded, other upgrades such as plantings and a pedestrian path could be worthwhile. • Please allow overnight parking in a limited capacity.... • i frequently walk my toddler granddaughter east down Shoreline Drive, cross street with crosswalk and then nagivate the parking lot to take her to the park. It would be nice to have designated crosswalk for that adventure. • If this parking lot is going to be used as a multi -purpose, where are patrons for the Narrows/Lakeroom and Hardware store parking during events? And also where are patrons to the "other events" parking? • This lot is not big enough to hold events without coordinating with businesses. A farmers market or community event would be harmful to my business. There are many trucks with trailers and taller service vans that use the lot so need to make sure to accomodat e these users- parking lot islands or dividers would make parking with a trailer difficult. • It would be nice to tie this into the extention of the Dakota trail that was completed this year. Make it a space for bike parking as well as an event space and pa rking lot. • Would be great to have space for food trucks/farmer's market/music • Most of the items above will add significant increases to the project. The lot is highly used and optimizing the number of spaces should at the top of the list. The items provided could be incorporated as long as no space was reduced for parking. • Combine the electric vehicle charging with the shade structure - look to Great River Energy for examples, or Apandana Solar- they put the array on top of the MSP airport garage • I would love to see a well-lit space that feels safe for all people, all the time. It's a bus stop for children in the morning, so having it clean and safe should be a priority. I'd love to see some outdoor dining space for the resataurants too. It is the loading dock for the hardware store, so there are challenges, but I look forward to seeing a great solution! Thanks for allowing us to input! • Adding compatible amenities would be fine but imperative that ample parking for adjacent businesses is preserved. • Limited space. Keep enough space for businesses • Should be a designated bike lane • Leave it • looks good !!! • Keep our taxes down. Don't look to spend money on community needs that don't exist. • Please DO NOT put art and murals. They can be very subjective and do not tend to age well. Let nature be the "art" • NO ART OR MURALS - NO BLM MARXISM, NO PLACE FOR ANTI-AMERICA, ANTI- WHITE MALE GRAFFITI. NO EV CHARGING. PERIOD. I like the lighting and pavers and natural plantings. • It's trashy now. And used by fletcher's employees and parade of homes type buses. Keep them out so it's safe to park Appendix B Question 4 - Write-in Answers • skate park, basketball or other youth opportunities • walk way from shoreline to the lot is unusable and disgusting. Clean it up, make it safe and highly visible so people know that it is there and is access from lot to street. Excelsior h as a couple of these pedestrian alleys between their main street and public parking lots. They are attractive and used frequently. • Open space for events within natural environment • Should be a designated bike land • Way for bikes to safely travel through the parking lot. Great job on the 27th pedestrian crossing point on 15 and bike path to get down to trail system. Something simple for pedestrians and bikes to get through parking lot • I would protect the children's park more by closing the street and putting up a short stone wall.ic • Plan with the park next door—maybe link to the DRT—Dakota Regional Trail AND think about downtown Navarre as a whole. Think big. Hard to believe that our municipal parking could be the focal point for the city!! • After using the shoreline crosswalk, a pedestrian is hard for drivers to see coming thru the alley by Lulu's. Same for pedestrians coming up from lot to street. • parking ramp • It is an off Street back alley type parking lot… Restriped it and leave it alone… Does not n eed improvement… Hopefully our tax dollars are spent elsewhere • More spaces - perhaps add a multilevel garage. • Ensure there is enough parking for existing businesses. • Make it larger or add another level of parking. Or take out the playground and use this area for events/parking. • No - parking is always an issue so keep the parking - don't be like Wayzata (worst parking) and Excelsior • Close the street between the parking lot and kids playground and regrade and combine the areas. • keep the parking for supporting the local businesses • Traditional parking lot is the most functional and cost -conscious/efficient • parking structure • Maybe clearly define all the different spaces: parking, driving, gathering, etc. • restrict overnight parking • 2 - 3 level parking? • A flatter lot with more defined spaces and more space for each space (many more SUVs than before). It would be nice to tie the parking lot in with the parking lot across the street. • multilevel parking • 2 tiered parking, cleaning up scrub planting with real trees and shrubs • Just good parking • Provide parking for the park. Put some planting down the middle so traffic does not cut through at an angle at a high speed. Push back the hillside and provide some terrace planting. • Designated restaurant parking • bigger ?? • Needs to be level • Need shade. How about winter use? • Improved drainage in all of Navarre • Make the dumpsters less noticable from the patios at the lake room and saloon • Design the it so people don't drive diagnolly through the lot as a shortcut around the intersection • Enhance the rear of the buildings which contain the interior shop, TrueValue, restaurants, etc. Th e exterior in the back looks very worn. • Stop the drive through traffic • slow traffic speed • The exits onto shoreline drive are traffic hazards and are used as "cut throughs" • reduce speed limit on Shoreline Dr. • Making this a city hub would be great for t he community! • Promote better retail use of lower level of 34xx Shoreline Drive building. Great spot for a brewery. • Keep it simple. • Manage unpack from restaurant use. And encourage park and ride to reduce traffic if lit has sufficient capacity. • No comment • No • No • No • No Appendix D Question 5 - Write-in Answers • Charge the Narrows for spots for their customers and the rest make farmers market, art fairs. Put bicycle racks so people can stop and shop/eat • I own Navarre Hardware. The Narrows and Lake Room will often take most of the parking during evenings and weekend brunch (10am - 2pm). During these times there is not enough parking for my customers. Many parking spaces are only 16' deep which is not enough for a full size car, SUV or truck so vehicles extend into the drive lanes making navigation difficult .At times Lord Fletchers has used the lot for employee parking and used a shuttle. The lot also gets used for Parade of Homes, Artisan Home Tour, daily commuters, meeting place for local workers, etc. ,These activities can take 20 spaces which creates more stress on parking availability. • mark areas for the adjacent business use. (i.e. Hardware Store Parking Only & Narrows Parking Only) • You should have easy walkthrough to get to the businesses off of 15. Like a little walkway with signs for the business names up front as only Narrows and hardware store have doors to enter from the back • I use it a lot for shopping at Navarre Hardware. And the little thrift shop. The hilly terrain can be a challenge. It is a nice option to the crazy traffic at the intersection. Although I know that has been updated. • Needed for surrounding businesses since limited street parking. • I hope this also helps bring in more diverse shops that will make this a great "downtown" for Orono • Does not need to be community gathering space. Need to clean up the rest of Navarre first. Make Navarre more hospitable to businesses • if there is speeding or shortcut use then perhaps the speed humps • Maintenance on stairways in all parking lots in Navarre • Coordinate with the private lot renewal at southwest quadrant.All dumpster enclosures need help • Steep terrain in NW corner makes some of the land currently unusable. A retaining wall or terracing might help create more usable space. • needs to be restriped to make it more functional west end of parking i s under utilized maybe where farmers market goes • Just needs to be safe - lighting and walkway will help. • I don't know what control there is over the appearance of the buildings, but updating the western buildings would really be helpful to become more of a community/destination spot. • Nice signage directing people to parking would help people know it is there. I do not think this lot is all that suitable for events since any such event would consume the parking space and force people attending to park on neighboring residential streets. • better lighting, safe pedestrian areas • No. Perhaps the street can be closed off to traffic, so you can just enter and exit along Shadywood, but you cannot go through the neighborhood. Already, there is too much traffic. • It gets used as a roadway to return from shopping to residential to the north and that neighborhood engagement should try to be maintained • The two houses should provide some space for additional parking on their property. Also include improving the small lot next to the Lulu pizza in the design. Maybe add a landscaped buffer and a bench or two between the pizza parking lot and the county road. • Improved connection to the Dakota trail • Sustainable energy • During busy times, like brunch or weekend dinners the lot gets full. • It's busy now. Where else will people park if there is an event in the lot? • essential to the neighborhood • Current lot has served its purpose very well. • we love this idea!! • It's pretty full most of the time • Leave it. Turn Casco circle into a farmers market • This is the center of lake minnetonka. Yes, there are other iconic locations around the lake, but this is literally the center of the lake. Lets make it a des tination that is cool! • Keep it as a parking lot! • The lot is too small for anything but parking!! • Electric vehicle plug-ins… You have got to be effing kidding me • No • No • No • No • no • No comment • ? Appendix E Pop-up Responses • Complaint that the scope of this project was not large enough. • Clear corner to get more spaces out of the corner and retaining wall (Two green dots). • Trees: shade and cooling will be essential with global warming. • Move bollards at park to create more parking. • Fix grading- In winter the slope gets icy & can’t use (Two green dots). • Solar power shade structure. • Confirming aisles & spaces. • Rows are tight, backing up is tricky. • Beautification – Pavers look nice but cost/maintenance (Two green dots). • Directional and angle. • Create a destination as the downtown. • Gets used as a shuttle lot. • Support the businesses – they need the parking. • Bike parking/connection to Luce Line State Trail. • Trailer and long vehicle parking. • “Conduct for future improvements”. • Work with landlord and center to screen dumpsters and [illegible] for their parking lot. • Trash from businesses. • Add a bike lane to set them from the trail connection to the crosswalk on 15. • School bus drop off. • Lyric Ave traffic calming. H:\ORNO\2022 New Projects\Fee Estimate - Navarre Parking Lot Design.docx June 7, 2022 City of Orono Attn: Adam Edwards PO Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 RE: Navarre Parking Lot Improvements – Design and Bidding Services Dear Adam: As requested, we have prepared a scope of services and design fee estimate for the proposed Navarre Parking Lot Improvements. It is our understanding that the scope of the project will include milling and overlaying the existing pavement. The project will also include additional lighting, concrete islands, and improvements to the storm sewer structures. The approved concept plan is attached for reference. Proposed Scope of Engineering Services To assist the city with this improvement project, Bolton & Menk proposes the following scope of services: Staff Design Meetings – Our team will work with City staff to develop the scope of the project and to get input on design details. The goal of these meetings is to ensure that the project is designed consistent with City standards and that the City’s maintenance practices and operations are considered throughout the design process. Detailed Design and Bidding – Once the final scope of the project is determined, Bolton & Menk will prepare detailed plans and specifications. This work will include design of a lighting system that meets lighting levels approved by the city. Once authorized, the project will be advertised for competitive bids. Bolton & Menk will administer the bidding process and will ultimately make a recommendation to the City Council about awarding the project. Fee Estimate Based on the scope of services described above, we propose a not-to-exceed fee of $42,750 to be billed on an hourly basis. Once the Construction Contract is awarded, Bolton & Menk will prepare a separate scope and fee estimate for construction phase services. Please let me know if you have questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. David P. Martini, P.E. Senior Principal Engineer 40 . 2 ' OPTIONAL ELECTRIC/WATER SERVICE 9' 1 4 . 5 ' 1 4 . 5 ' 23.21 ' 30'24' 1 1 . 6 ' 2.5' PAVEMENT EXPANSION REINSTALL SALVAGED LIGHT POLE 22.24' B612 CURB BOLLARD LOCATION SURMOUNTABLE CURB B612 CURB SURMOUNTABLE CURB PRIVATELY OWNED PARKING SALVAGE AND REINSTALL LIGHT POLE SALVAGE LIGHT POLE REINSTALL SALVAGED LIGHT POLE SALVAGE LIGHT POLE R NAVARRE MUNICIPAL PARKING LOT CONSTRUCTION PLAN FEETSCALE 0 25 50 HORZ.1 C S A H 1 9 / S H A D Y W O O D R D CSAH 15 / SHORELINE DR LYRIC AVENUE 3360 SHORELINE DRIVE3382 SHORELINE DRIVE3400 SHORELINE DRIVE3416 SHORELINE DRIVE 2385 SHADYWOOD RD 2377 SHADYWOOD RD 3422 LRYIC AVE3438 LRYIC AVE 3465 LRYIC AVE DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. SHEET B o l t o n & M e n k , I n c . 20 2 2 , A l l R i g h t s R e s e r v e d c H: \ O R N O \ 0 C 1 1 2 6 0 0 5 \ C A D \ C 3 D \ 1 2 6 0 0 5 C 6 0 9 . d w g 4/ 6 / 2 0 2 2 1 0 : 3 1 : 2 5 A M DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO. R 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 Phone: (952) 448-8838 Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.comJEFF J. WEYANDT 41342 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA NAVARRE PARKING LOT REHABILITATIONKLB 7 ' AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: L. Oakden Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By 1. Purpose. To adopt resolution approving an emergency repair of a lake slope. 2. Background. A variance application was submitted on June 22, 2022 to repair a retaining wall at 1354 Rest Point Circle. The repair for the walls indicate a footprint expansion to support the slope of the lakeyard leaving the existing walls in place. A soils engineer provided documentation showing the slope failure is imminent and needs an emergency fix. The city code section 78-1726 (6) Emergency repair exception. Slope failures have a direct impact on the health and welfare of Orono residents, and timely response to such events is important to the protection of natural resources and private property. Therefore, the city engineer may declare grading and/or export/import activities in the Lake yard exceeding the limits above as emergency repair and forward such application to the city council for immediate review. Emergency repair shall be defined for the purposes of this article as the activities necessary to stabilize a failing slope, or prevent the imminent failure of a slope, in the opinion of the city engineer. The recommended correction for this slope failure is to construct new walls in front of the existing failing walls. A building permit and variance is required to allow a new footprint expansion of a retaining wall within the lakeyard 3. Engineer Comments. a. This Application: The applicant has provided a letter from a licensed engineer, Ronald Vickery, with the assessment that a slope failure is imminent. Further the same engineer has provided a plan for stabilizing the slope using retaining wall in front of the failing existing walls and installing soil anchors. I believe the proposed fix does address the potential slope failure. In this particular instance the proposed emergency repair appears to also be the proposed permanent repair. Therefore my recommendation for council to authorize the emergency repair in a timely manner but is not a recommendation to forgo the normal requirements associated with improvements in the lakeyard / 75foot setback for the permanent structure which should still follow. b. Code Section 78-1726 (6). To my knowledge this is the first time this code section has been invoked since it was added several years ago. This application is a good test case for the ordinance and while I believe meets the intent of the code section, it does identify a potential need for a code amendment to provide better clarity and links to other sections of code. The portion of code this emergency repairs exception is in deals with grade alterations but does not specifically include structures within the lake yard. Most of the best practices for providing emergency slope stabilization involve some sort of structure. I recommend the city review this section of code to specifically acknowledge the use of structures for emergency slope repairs. 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the resolution to allow the contractor to proceed with for the emergency slope failure as designed. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the attached resolution Item No.: 10 Date: June 27, 2022 Item Description: 1354 Rest Point Cir, Dennis Walsh, Emergency Slope Failure – Resolution No. 7273 Presenter: Laura Oakden Interim Community Development Director Agenda Section: Community Development Report Exhibits A. Draft Resolution 7273 B. Proposed Plan C. City Code Section 78-1729 D. Engineer Letter E. Variance Application CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7273 1 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN EMERGENCY SLOPE REPAIR PURSUANT TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-1726 WHEREAS, on June 9, 2022, Dennis Walsh (hereinafter the “Applicant”), pursuant to City Code 78-1726, applied for authorization to proceed with an emergency repair to the lake slope on his property addressed 1354 Rest Point Circle and legally described as: Lot 11, Subdivision of Lot 14 Rest Point Park, Lake Minnetonka and Lot 13 Subdivision of Rest Point Park, Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the “Property”); WHEREAS, the Applicant submitted documentation from a licensed professional engineer which indicates the failure of the current lake yard slope on the Property and the existing retaining walls is imminent; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has made a request to the City of Orono for an emergency slope repair pursuant to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1726; and WHEREAS, on June 9, 2022, a corrective restoration plan was provided by the Applicant’s licensed professional engineer to correct and reinforce the existing failing retaining walls; and WHEREAS, the engineered plans proposed an expansion of the existing retaining wall footprint within the 75’ setback from the ordinary high water level (hereinafter the “OHWL”) of Lake Minnetonka where no walls are permitted and existing walls are failing; and WHEREAS, due to their proximity to the OHWL the new, reinforcement retaining walls will require a setback variance from City Code section 78-1279; and WHEREAS, on June 27, 2022, the City Council reviewed the request, the engineered plans, and the recommendations of the City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested emergency slope repair including new engineered retaining walls as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7273 2 FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the LR-1B Zoning District. 3. The Property contains 0.71 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 125 feet. 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. The Property contains existing timber walls within the lake yard 75-feet from the OHWL which have been determined to be under imminent threat of failure confirmed by a licensed professional engineer. 6. The Applicant has requested consideration for an emergency slope repair pursuant to City Code Section 78-1726. Engineered plans were provided which demonstrate the proposed corrective action. 7. Retaining walls are not permitted within 75-feet of the OHWL; installation of new walls require City Council approval of a lake setback variance. 8. In considering this application for emergency slope repair, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the City Staff and the effect of the proposed emergency slope repair upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants approval to proceed with an emergency slope repair pursuant to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1726 to allow the repair of the existing retaining walls including installation of new retaining walls according to the approved plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7273 3 2. The approved emergency slope repair shall conform to the submitted plans (hereinafter the “Plans”) submitted by the Applicant and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. 3. Any amendments to the emergency slope repair which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. A building permit must be issued before work can commence on the emergency slope repair. 5. The Applicant shall apply for and receive an after-the-fact variance from City Code 78- 1279 prior to finalization of the building permit for installation of the walls. 6. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a variance and building permit for the Plans. A building permit must be applied for within 60 days of the date of Council approval, or the action will expire after August 26, 2022. 7. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 27th day of June, 2022. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: _______________________________ ________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Aaron Printup, Acting Mayor Title VI - LAND USE Chapter 78 - ZONING REGULATIONS ARTICLE XIV. - INTERIM USES DIVISION 1. - GENERALLY Subdivision I. Land Alterations Orono, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2022-03-25 15:53:39 [EST] (Supp. No. 20, Update 1) Page 1 of 2 Subdivision I. Land Alterations 1 Sec. 78-1725. Purpose and intent. The purpose of this section is to promote the health, safety, and welfare of the community and to establish reasonable uniform limitations, standards, and controls for land alterations, excavating, filling and grading within the city. The regulations will allow the city to better manage stormwater discharge, ensuring drainage does not negatively impact neighboring properties, manage hauling traffic and noise, and prevent erosion issues onto adjacent properties, wetlands, lakes, and roads. (Ord. No. 219 3rd series, § 6, 12-10-2018) Sec. 78-1726. Interim use permit required. An application for an interim use permit shall be accompanied by a certified site plan showing the location of the proposed excavation or storage and shall state the amount of material which is to be removed, excavated or stored, placed, or graded, and such other information as the council may require. Applications shall be filed with the city administrator and shall be accompanied by a deposit to be determined by the city, which will be used to offset the cost of processing the application. Any unused portion will be refunded to the applicant. (a) Except where otherwise provided in the article, it is unlawful for any person to perform or have performed the following land alteration activities without an interim use permit issued by the council: (1) Mining. The commercial extraction of sand, gravel or other material from the land and their removal from the site without processing shall be mining. In all districts, the conduct of mining shall be permitted only upon issuance of a interim use permit. Such permit shall include, as a condition, a plan for a finished grade which will not adversely affect the surrounding land or development of the site on which the mining is being conducted, and the route of trucks moving to and from the sites. A bond will be required for restoration (2) Soil processing. The operation of processing of sand, gravel or other material mined from the land shall be permitted only by interim use permit. Such permit shall include a site plan where the processing is to be done, showing the location of the plant, disposal of water, route of trucks moving to and from the site in removing processed material from the site, the condition in which the site is intended to be left upon completion, hour of operation; and such permit shall not be granted for a period of longer than 12 months (3) Creation of an engineered grade for the basis of building height determination outside of a subdivision. (4) Unless included as part of a permitted project or as exempted below, the following activities require a separate interim use permit. 1Cross reference(s)—Grading and land alterations, § 78-1590 et seq. Created: 2022-03-25 15:53:39 [EST] (Supp. No. 20, Update 1) Page 2 of 2 Location Activity Lake Yard or Shore Setback Zone Activity in the Shoreland Overlay District, but outside the Lake Yard All other areas, lots 5 acres or less All other areas, lots greater than 5 acres Grading More than 10 CY, or more than 1,000 sq. ft. of disturbed area More than 2,500 CY, or more than 10,000 sq. ft. of area More than 2,500 CY, or more than 10,000 sq. ft. of area More than 5,000 CY, or more than 20,000 sq. ft. of area Import/Export More than 500 CY More than 500 CY More than 2,500 CY More than 5,000 CY Stockpiling Stockpiling more than 90 days Stockpiling more than 180 days Stockpiling more than 180 days Stockpiling more than 180 days (5) Conducting grading or land alterations which result in changes in elevations within five feet of adjacent properties, unless part of a building project. (6) Emergency repair exception. Slope failures have a direct impact on the health and welfare of Orono residents, and timely response to such events is important to the protection of natural resources and private property. Therefore, the city engineer may declare grading and/or export/import activities in the Lake yard exceeding the limits above as emergency repair and forward such application to the city council for immediate review. Emergency repair shall be defined for the purposes of this article as the activities necessary to stabilize a failing slope, or prevent the imminent failure of a slope, in the opinion of the city engineer. (Ord. No. 219 3rd series, § 6, 12-10-2018; Ord. No. 243 3rd series, § 4, 4-13-2020) Secs. 78-1727—78-1744. Reserved. June 13, 2022 Project VEC 21-230 Mr. Dave Durkin Boulder Creations Unlimited 309 Newton Avenue SE Watertown, MN 55388 Dear Mr. Durkin: Re: Wall Evaluation, 1354 Rest Point Circle in Mound, Minnesota As you requested, Vickery Engineering & Consulting, LLC (VEC) has performed visual observations of the existing timber walls at the referenced location. As requested, I’m writing this letter to discuss the evaluation of the existing timber walls. Background Information VEC prepared final design and construction drawings for the new retaining walls on this project. The plans prepared are titled “Proposed Timber Retaining Walls, 1354 Rest Point Circle, Mound, Minnesota", and were dated 6/4/2022. The project number for the plans was VEC 21-230. Site Observations VEC performed observations of the existing retaining walls last fall. At that time, the walls were observed to be leaning outwards, with many of the timbers showing indications of the decay of the wood. Several of the walls showed indications that the face of the wall was pulling away from the deadmen that are anchoring the wall face in place. Discussion The existing walls are essential in holding the slope in place during construction. In order to keep the slope from falling into the lake, shoring will be required to keep the existing soils on the slope. There is no way to get a pile driving rig into the back yard to provide sheet piling for shoring, so leaving the existing walls in place and building in front of the walls is the only way to repair the walls on the slope. Conclusions Based on our on-site observations, it is our opinion that if the walls aren’t repaired in the near future, the entire slope will likely end up in the lake, walls and all. The potential for failure increases every day that passes, and failure could be imminent, especially if there are any large rain events in the new future. Project VEC 21-230 Wall Evaluation June 13, 2022 Page 2 of 2 General Engineering services provided by VEC engineers for this project have been conducted with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of profession currently practicing in Minnesota under similar time restraints. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Thank you for using the services provided by VEC. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please call Ron Vickery at 952-465-8272. Sincerely, Ronald W. Vickery, PE President/Principal Engineer Letter View CC Exhibit E Application Date: Address: Parcel Number: Land Use Number: Application Submitted By: Owner: Land Use Application Summary 06/22/2022 1354 Rest Point Circle Orono, MN 55364 0711723320062 LA22-00003 8 Property Owner Name: DENNIS WALSH/AMANDA HEIEN Address: 1354 REST POINT CIR MOUND MN 55364 Applicant: Name: dennis walsh Company: Address: 1354 Rest Point Circle orono, MN 55364 Rkdenny@gmail.com Contact Information: Project Description: Land Use Application Type: Applicant Signature: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Slope failure Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision ❑ Concept Application ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception ❑ Vacation Application ❑ Variance Application 0 file:///C/LJsers/loakden/Downloads/Land%20Use%20Application%20Summary%20(20).htm[6/23/2022 2:21:02 PM] AGENDA ITEM 1. Purpose. The meeting will be closed as permitted by section 13D.05, Subdivision 3(c), to consider offers to purchase City owned properties identified as PID: 3411823320050 Item No.: 11 Date: June 24, 2022 Item Description: Closed Session Presenter: Adam Edwards, City Administrator/Engineer Agenda Section: Closed Session