Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDog kennek permit � � DATE: June 18, 1981 T0: Tom Jacobs FROM: Chief Mel Kilbo SUBJECT: Koltes Dog Kennel Permi-t A review of police department records has been done relative to the petition. The first case file that comes to Aur attention is #80-112 which is dated Jan. 9, 1980. This is a dc�g bite report from Methodist Hosp. Emergency rece�iving room involving the bitten party, Mary Koltes. The party was bitten by her ov,m dog. The dog bite report was taken pursuant to state regulations. The next case file is #80-3055 dated June 23, 1980 and this is a report by Mary Koltes advising that somebody had fired what appeared to be a gun at their dog. The dogs were supposed to have been on a balcony patio of her home. There is no evidence of a projectile striking. Complainant stated that one of her four dogs was shot last year. The reporting officer was aware that many of the neighbors were unhappy with the dogs and their barking. The next offense report is dated Oct. 17, 1980, case file #gp-5276, the complainant was Gene Block of Bayview Place. Mr. Block advised that his neighbor, Mary Koltes has as many as six dogs in the house. He stated that she lets her dogs out on the porch, they bark when ever anybody walks by on the street or when any other dogs or animals come into the yard. Stated that the dogs do interfere witl� his normal hours of sleep. The reporting officer went to talk with Mrs. Koltes about the dogs, and found four dags at the house. She did have licenses for the dogs. She did have a kennel licen se. She stated she did have one female in heat, I informed her that any females in heat should be confined inside. The next complaint in our records is dated April 27, 1981 , case file #81-2296. It was a complaint by Sherrie Block, at 10:16 in the evening. She states that she and the neighbor, Shirley Pavlok of Bayview Place reported a con- tinuing problem with noise coming from dogs at 2300 Bayview. Dogs are owned by Mary Koltes. Owner was not home at the time while the reporting officer was there. He did observ�: five dogs on a deck adjoining the residence. The dogs wer�e • free to go in and out of the house. Reporting parties stated they were willing to sign a complaint to resolve the problem. � � � r _2_ . Koltes arrived shortly after the reporting officer finished speaking with the reporting parties. Koltes states she for- got to bring the dogs in the house prior to leaving. She - was notified by the officer of the noise problem as being a continuing one. Koltes stated she has a kennel permit. Koltes added, her dogs have been shot on occassion by pellet I guns. It was also noted that the license expires on April 30, 1981 . The reporting officer finally got ahold of Mr. Block at 1610 hrs and advised him the possible action to be taken would be to contact City Council members and advise them of the complaints as his license expires on April 30, 1981 . It was also advised to call the City Offices and make them aware of the complaint so that they would be aware of it � at license renewal time. Mr. Block agreed to try that rather than go formal complaint at this time. The next case file is #81-2473 dated May 5, 1981 at 1005 hrs. Ms. Shirley Pavlak of Bayview Place, registered a complaint of barking dogs in Bayvi�w Place. The address given showed to be the same place and dog of an earlier complaint the last few days of April. Num�rous dogs were outside barking at Bayview Place. The kennel license was to have been up on April 30. No apparent renewal has taken place. The re- porting officer knocked on the door for about 10 minutes before arousing a male sleeping on the floor. The music from the radio was also very loud. The renter of the house previously spoken to was not home. The occupant, Stuart, was told to shut the musci off and keep the dogs inside. .. The next case file was on May 2, 1981 at 9:47 at 2300 Bayview. Mr. Block was the complainant on this one and reports dogs barking at 2300 Bayview. Numerous complaints have been received in the past. Received the second complaint at 10:25 after no dogs could be heard by reporting officer on the first call.:after, waiting in the area for approximately 13 minutes. On the second call, the owner arrived just prior to the reporting officer. Reporting officer told Mrs. Koltes she had to keep her dogs in the house so they would not disturb. The officer also observed a dog not seen before. The owner stated she was applying again for a kennel permit. Reporting officer spoke with the reporting party who was advised to contact the City Offices with other neighbors as a possible way to stop the acquisition of a kennel permit. We have further researched all of the other names on the petition, and we particularly note a comment by Mr. & Mrs. . Larry Nelson of 2350 Olive, that one of her Afghans that was left out late at night attacked their dog which is on a chain. The Afghan was supposed to also have bit their daughter. We do not find such a report on file. We do not have any reports on file from the Christiansens, Williamsons, Carlson, or from Mrs. Dale Matson of 2200 Bayview Place, recorded in reference to the dogs. > TO: City Council FROM: Thomas J. Jacobs DATE: June 18, 1981 SUBJECT: Residential Kennel License - D4ary Koltes 2300 Bayview Place - Petition A petition has been submitted to the City by neighbors of the above subject property, askes that the I:ennel License be denied. In reviewing past approval of this Kennel License and history, I have found that Mary Koltes has had a number of violations in regard to the approval of her Kennel License. (Refer - 4/3/80 inspection) Her Kennel License was approved with my recommendation that only three dogs be permitted, and they were to be on her deck or in her yard under restraint when owner is at home. (Refer to inspection 4/8/81) Referrinq to Chief Mel Kilbo ' s memo to me June 18, 1981, he has had up to six dogs on the property. We 've had reports that they 've been running loose at times, and left on deck when owner has left the property. Mary Koltes has not made an application to renew the Kennel License at this time, but my recommendation is that she be denied a Kennel License for reasons stated above . cc: Mel Ki1bo . ��. � KENNEL LICENSE INSPECTION • Name Mar� Kolt�� Address �3�0 Bayview Approximate Nurnber of Dogs kept 3 How Dogs are to be restrained: Fenced Area Clther on deck and �n ��ar �n .r rPstraint t.rhan �t.mer is at home . Area (approximate) Condition of Area good Remarks �t the time of inspe�tion thier were four dogs on pro�erty, owner said that one of the dogs belonged to her daughter who lives in Mpls , she told me that the dog would be goirig back soon, she gave me no date . Three of the dogs are licensed, the dog from Mpls . is not licensed anywhere . My reccomend.ation is that issue license for three dogs , and the fourth must be removed from Orono as it is not 7,ic�nsed in Orono. � ' � � -- Thomas J. J.acobs Building Inspector � F .,.Y. � .. �.:.... . '�,� `Zk'��.{�' �,� � �`� �' � ,.f ������� , , � �: ,�, /' �``�. --��'' � �'�G'�,�-�`.t��`''"�-' �'�,���,.�` r? � ; -�' --�,�-,�--- �- ��-,�- �-��°--"'�r--�`",/�' , ��,� U ��� o _Z;, __.. `,� d��.- ��--�..,,.�.�-- _.�.,,��,�,.._.. ���� ���` �� ' . .. l"�.c..'y��"" "�"y-�,s�L'�'lil�l'�-'t/� � �y'"�-�,/1""�t�� �YJi- � ' , � ----__• -,-�--Y- �.-�' v�—y- �--1� .�'� ,� , ����%� � � � , �, j � '' '_Y,� � ' , ��-�-�'^ � ��'� ����� �-�'� � '`' / � '�^ �,"�`� 1"-�-v�'�Y,'� ��r���+�,��y{�r} / J L/ � i � � .'(' 'Y��,�3'YY \ �/' :; ', . •J` �' �`'� ?�—��.�� ��'� �''� '�-.�yr ��j_,'' ,.�",,.,��_. . � '� , ;:� f -�- ,, ��-'--'_''-y,� �Y1` �'',.�..;�" - --.ti� ,-,�-,-,.,.,, yY�'� �" ( i R r ` ` i �- , --y-^�r.-,�,�. �';r����-��� �"'y"�'-,y'' , yv--✓' . !� _____ ..� ^.r, , � r ,,.,�--� -�,-1�,-;-�.-�-ti�s -- ' - —ry'1,�—� �---y�� , ..�. �/ � ��`���,�`� �1�1 ,�:.� ^J � c, � �i._. �� �� ri ;J�'�,.r�' � f� -�' _�� f/ . _ .,,-, -- ., ' ^�''���t.. /� -�;� �' dc � ,-�,r�,.,s..��L/ o na+�-,,j✓�j"'t�Y N'�' `� t'%� 7/ J / / / r . .-�=�.--z,-._-f�'.. ,� y-��`..� , �; n ` ,_. .r� � (�T �� `i��'J/y.._. '"'1��l7�L—,e�i. /'1`.�...yr�'_� �'��_�-� � � —,r, ^ , ' �7� --v'^ .J-��"�:�'� ,7" ✓ _ _'_.7� ' (�7�_°�~�Z��� �� �__��' 3'7.�7-� ,/���, /" �.��.�,- . �> ,l/ -,L- . �� ...�Y"�...]-.'j�.�. �/ •'w�y--��v/ / I `%Li —.i �wZ/Y �" �'^�t„/ " '-/_ f � / �J��-� . "�f�--.�r-^S''�i�'' �''(.`�� _, �/ Y T ./ r ,/ �r,..-. . � �' - ';% � /� � -S � • _�` �� r _ -� ��. � .�'�� ` `��� �z ra-�-ti y,�� J � �,�.� �'`Z'�-� - f � r' �1���' ^v�t'��/� ���-7/� ,-.-r,�� �7Z '-, � c `�J.�7 '-���'-�.�r-�'J`'�' v �- �-�--�� -�,�;= , . ._�.-� . � zr�'' ��,�� „o�-- �-�-�'� ' -�.�,�--� i ^ '�--��1ry,.,,z (/ � �/ _ ��la �/r-V��/ � �t��%� �'�' /� �L�� �� �/ / 1 C4 << / / C /�> t._ , f. , � � ���-,���,� �� �n S ��'� . �--.��_. . � %.���,������:� � ����.��, , --_ G. e �� l� i ,L' ' ��`�� =L�-,L� �ti. --. _-G-� `�.. �� � fi; r /,� �_ � ~ ��S 3 ,�0`-v-`�...�'��--�`� A � �J �` ��, �Z, � � � =, � �' r��,� /1' �� �,G, » >> ���', ��`%t.,¢_,-. _- • ---t� . .%'j �c����'�_��'��--� �r � ' 1 � �� � '"���� �� \�`.��'� � C` w.. ...._.__ Ci✓i✓�!�, � 1 � �,1.��, �3 S � c—�,;-�-.� .�_ f � t � ' . �<. �: __'��, c,,�y �� � ,-� �—�'�\.L�,� (�__' . A . �� �`�`'~"� � 1 l�J U,� , � �� t�.�.�; --�:_C.�..�_�. � , �;. t_ �-•_-'�� � � _�� �tis:�c �,',` � �� � -' �-\s"� �T`'�- �� 1v.2� :�,_ �����.�E ''� , ' � � `�.��` ��. J�y_. ::,, �-_� ���.�., �,. ._-�_... , � � - "-'�., ,,,.,�,�.n_.� _,-,,..v�'� '� i , " ,,,�'% /� , ,�`"_ -,�,,.--�:_ ���� `'�y �`,��' �Z.. �. �,,.,%,� __ � ��/�/v�� 6:. /.. - � /i �..]-��� ��( �" d � e 'l ��'f ,G,,, y �..�� , i . ,r. LL . � k,�;r,�. �:v ..�.�a�a. ,,� �a .,�. ��,.k -�.��: �_ ..,� , �..y 'I�v.`� ,� i :1 �>� Nrr".;� - - �+" - '���. k 11�; t � +a1. . �� . kN r�<Sh Y`p ��� �, • +i•S� �F A. � �j�'6 � �q,� ' • 7A� . tl� 4 3' 2 "�f LL 9$S���'W�J M1 A " . � � .�e"r i . � . . . », , , ,,� ..r'r ;� � � a ��� � . -,�:'�� .�� -s +�+,� . - . , , , , ,.� -.,:r� :; , "� ` �. l, f. . , . ». . ..:, t � Y. DATE: June 18, 1981 T0: Tom Jacobs FROM: Chief Mel Ki1bo SUBJECT : Koltes Dog Kennel Permit A review of palice department records has been done relative to the petition. The first case file that comes to our attention is #80-112 which is dated Jan. 9 , 'I980. This is a dog bite report from Method?st Hosp. Emerge�cy receivirlg room involving the bitten party, Mary Koltes. The party was bitten by her own dog. The dog bite report was taken pursuant to state regulations. The next case file is #80-3055 dated June 23, '1980 and this is a report �y �Iary Koltes advising that somebody had fired what appeared to be a gun at their dog. The dogs were supposed to have been on a balcony patio of her home. There is no evidence of a projectile striking. Complainant stated that one of her four dogs was shot last year. The reporting officer was aware that many of the r�eighbors were unhappy with the dogs and their barking. The next offense report is dated Oct. 17, '1980, case file #80-5276, the complainant was Gene Block of Bayview Place. Mr. Block advised that his neighbor, Mary Koltes has as many as six dogs in the house. He stated that she lets her dogs out r�n the porch, they bark when ever anybody walks by on the street or when any other dogs or �nimals came into the yard. Stated that the dogs do interfere with his no�al hour: of sleep. The reporting officer went to talk with Mrs. Koltes about the dogs, and found four dogs at the house. She did have licenses for the dogs. She did have a kennel licezse. She stated she did have one female in heat, I informed her that any females in heat should be confined inside. The next complaint in our records is dated April 27, 1981 , case file #8�-2296� It was a complaint by Sherrie Block, at '10:'16 in the evening. She states that she and the neighbor, �hirley Pavlok of Bayview Place rep�rted a con- tinuing problezn with nois� coming from dogs at 2300 Bayview. Dogs are c�wned by Mary Koltes. Owner was not home at the ti�e while the reporting officer was there. He did observe five dogs on a deck �.djoining the residence. The dogs were free to go in and out of the house. Reporting parties stated they were willing to sign a complaint to resalve the problem. •6, -2- . � f Koltes arrived shortly after the r�parting officer finished speaking with the reporting parties. Koltes states she for- got to bring the dogs in the house pr:�or to leaving. She was notified by the officer of the noise problem as being a continuing one. Koltes stated she has a kennel permit. Koltes added, her dogs have been shot on occassion by pellet guns. It was also noted that the license exgires on April 30, 1981 . The reporting officer finally got ahold of Mr. Block at 1610 hrs and advised him the possible action to be taken would be to contact City Council members and advise them of the complaints as his licer�se expires on Apri1 30, '1981 . It was also advised to call the City Offices and make them aware of the complaint so that they would be aware of it at license renewal time. Mr. Block agreed t� try that rather than go formal complaint at this time. The next case file is #8'I-2473 dated May 5, 1981 at 1005 hrs. Ms. Shirley Pavlak of Bayview Place, registered a complaint of barking dogs in Bayview Place. The address given showed to be the same place and dog of an earlier complaint the last few days of April. Num�rous dogs were autsir3e barking at Bayview Place. The kennel license was to have been up on April 30. Vo apparent renewal has taken place. The re- porting officer knocked on the door far about 10 minutes before arousing a male sleepin.g on the floor. The musi_c from the radio was also very loud. The renter of the hou�e previously spoken to was not home. The occupant, Stuart, was told to shut the music otf and keep the dogs inside. . The next case �ile was on May 2, 1981 at 9:47 at 2300 Bayview. Mr. Block was the complainant on this one and report;s dogs barking at 2300 Bayview. Numerous complaints have been receiveci in the pas�. R�ceived the second complaint at 10:25 after no dogs could be heard by reporting afficer on � the first call af�er waiting in the area for approximately 13 minutes. On the second call, the owner arrived just prior to the reporting officer. Reporting o�ficer told Mrs. Koltes she had to keep her dogs in the house so they would riot disturb. The officer also observed a dog not seen before. The owner stated she was applying again for a kennel permit. Reporting officer spake with the reporting party who w3s advised to cantact th� City Offices with other neighbors as a possible way to stop the acquisition of a kennel permit. We have further researched all of the other names oa� the petition, and we particularly note a comment by Ndz�. & P�irs. Larry Nelson of 2350 Olive, that one of her Afghans that was left out late at night attacked their dog w�ich is on a chain. The Afghan was supposed to also have bit uheir daughter. We do not find such a report on �ils. �Te d� not have any reports on file from the Christiansenss Williamsons, Carlson, or from Mrs. Dale Matson of 2�.�Q Bayview Place, rec �rded in reference to the dogs.