Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-21-2022 Planning Commission Packet 0 Agenda Planning Commission Meeting Tuesday,June 21, 2022, 6:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers,2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono,MN 55356 iktsuo0' 952-249-4600/www.ci.orono.mn.us Audience Members: Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available on the City website (www.ci.orono.mn.us) in Agendas Minutes & Videos and in the Public Packet—located in the lobby near the entrance. Applicants will be asked to move to the lectern to answer questions after staff presents the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda, they will be scheduled for an upcoming City Council meeting. A quorum of the City Council may be in attendance of a Planning Commission meeting to hear comments made, though no action or deliberation of the Council will occur. Council Representative: Matt Johnson Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Agenda Approval of Minutes: May 16, 2022 Public Hearings: 1. LA22-000024 Sharratt Design, 3350 Fox Street, requests a conditional use permit for a guest house use. (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 2. LA22-000026 Al Azad, 165 Bederwood Drive, requests front and side yard setback variances for a garage addition. (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 3. LA22-000028 Peter Eskuche with Eskuche Design, 2605 North Shore Drive, requests variances for building, hardcover, and retaining walls within the 75' lakeshore, side yard, wetland buffer, and lot area in order to construct a new home. (Staff: Laura Oakden). 4. LA22-000029 John Peterson, 2880 Fox Street, requests a height variance for an accessory building to exceed the height of the home on the property. (Staff: Melanie Curtis) Other Business: 5. LA22-000027 Amy Swanson, 4025 Watertown Road, SUB-Sketch plan. (Staff: Laura Oakden) 6. Update on June 13, 2022 City Council meeting Adjourn Planning Commission Liaison to Monday, July 11, 2022 City Council meeting: Scott Kirchner Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us—follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,May 16,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Chair Mark McCutcheon,Vice Chair Scott Kirchner,Commissioners Chris Bollis,Dennis Libby,Jon Ressler,Bob Erickson, and Alternate Dave Peterson. Commissioner Matt Gettman was absent. Representing Staff were Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart,City Planner Melanie Curtis,and City Planner Laura Oakden. Chair Kirchner called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chair McCutcheon noted a request for item 2 under Public Hearings to be tabled. Ressler moved,Kirchner seconded,to approve the Agenda.VOTE: Ayes 7,Nays 0. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 18,2022 AND APRIL18,2022 WORKSHOP Libby moved,Bollis seconded,to approve the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission meeting of April 18,2022 and the April 18,2022 Workshop.VOTE: Ayes 7,Nays 0. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. LA22-000017 JON RESSLER,3683 &3685 NORTH SHORE DRIVE,REQUESTS A LOT WIDTH VARIANCES AS PART OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN THE TWO PROPERTIES. (STAFF: LAURA OAKDEN) Commissioner Ressler is part of the application and recused himself. He stepped away from his seat. Jon Ressler and Frank Plachecki,Applicants,were present. City Planner Oakden noted Ressler and Plachecki are neighboring property owners at 3683 and 3685 North Shore Drive.The Applicants are looking to complete an administrative boundary line.Moving the property boundary is a staff administrative action as long as no new non-conformities are created or an existing non-conformity is not increased.Each property will require a lot width variance in order to allow the boundary line adjustment and the existing lot width non-conformity will increase. Lot width is measured in 2 places on lakeshore properties, at the ordinary high water level(OHWL)and at the 75 foot lakeyard setback.Properties in the LR-1 C district require 100 foot lot width.Both properties are nonconforming to lot width, area and setbacks. Due to the angle of the proposed lot line,the lot width will decrease at the 75 foot lakeyard setback from 54 feet to 52 feet at 3683 (the smaller property on screen) and at 3685 the lot width will decrease from 92 feet to 82 feet at the OHWL.The new property boundary will maintain the same lot area sizes. Oakden stated the new property line will improve many of the non- conformities on the both parcels.The building setback, overall hardcover,and lot width at the OHWL will improve on the smaller property; currently all of those are non-conforming and all will improve and come closer to the City Code.The new property line will move off the existing driveway bringing the driveway setback closer to conformance for 3685 North Shore Drive. Oakden showed a slide on screen showing the proposed adjustments.The Applicant has primarily identified the existing conditions and the improvement of many non-conformities to the city Codes for each property as practical difficulties Page 1 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,May 16,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. supporting the requested variance lot width variances and boundary line adjustment.Additionally,they have provided their supporting documentation regarding practical difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Staff finds that the proposed lot line adjustment improving existing non-conformities on hardcover,building setbacks, and driveway setbacks is a positive improvement.The lot width variance requested may be supported by practical difficulty. Staff finds there may be some practical difficulties to support that lot width variance. Jon Ressler,3683 North Shore Drive, stated the reason for this application is to apply how the property has been used in practice for over three decades. Chair McCutcheon opened the public hearing at 6:10 p.m. Chair McCutcheon closed the public hearing at 6:10 p.m. Kirchner stated it seems that there are slight improvements to hardcover and he does not have a lot of issues with the application. Bollis sees that it is clearing up an issue as far as how the properties have been used.He agrees that part of it is getting smaller and the other getting bigger.The reduced hardcover and setback getting better in places is helpful. McCutcheon thinks they are improving the situation with items that Staff highlighted,plus thirty years is a long time and they are correcting something,especially when there is agreement from both neighbors. Kirchner moved,Libby seconded,to approve LA22-000017,3683&3685 North Shore Drive,Lot Width Variances as part of an Administrative Boundary Line Adjustment Between the two properties.VOTE: Ayes: 7,Nays 0. 2. LA22-000024 SHARRATT DESIGN,3350 FOX STREET,REQUESTS A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A GUEST HOUSE USE. (STAFF: MELANIE CURTIS) This item was tabled at the request of the Applicant. 3. LA22-000018 TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO SETBACKS FOR IRRIGATION SYSTEMS.THE AMENDMENT WOULD ALLOW IRRIGATION SYSTEMS IN REQUIRED YARDS.(STAFF: JEREMY BARNHART) Barnhart noted this is a general housekeeping amendment. Irrigation systems are a listed accessory use in most zoning districts including residential and there is a setback for accessory structures between 5, 10, and 15 feet. Irrigation systems are located throughout the yard and often within the required setback.They are proposing to add irrigation systems as a non-encroachment,allowing them to be irrigated in required yards. Staff recommends approval of the ordinance as drafted. Chair McCutcheon opened the public hearing at 6:18 p.m. Chair McCutcheon closed the public hearing at 6:18 p.m. Page 2 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,May 16,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. Ressler moved,Kirchner seconded,to approve LA22-000018 text amendment related to setbacks for irrigation systems as proposed.VOTE: Ayes: 7,Nays 0. 4. LA22-000019 TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO DOCKS AND EASEMENTS FOR DOCKS IN THE SEASONAL RECREATIONAL ZONING(RS)DISTRICT.THE AMENDMENT CLARIFIES CURRENT REGULATION ALLOWING BIG ISLAND OWNERS TO GRANT DOCK EASEMENTS FOR INTERIOR BIG ISLAND LOTS.(STAFF: JEREMY BARNHART) Barnhart gave a presentation noting a couple of years ago the City drafted an ordinance amendment that allowed Big Island lakeshore property owners to grant an easement to interior property owners.This easement for dock access is unique to Big Island and is not allowed anywhere else in the City. Today they are proposing to take the Code and add it to the zoning district so the user can find it easier.They are not changing practice or removing any rights,the City is just saying as it is allowed in the subdivision Code, they are now allowing it in the zoning Code. Chair McCutcheon opened the public hearing at 6:23 p.m. Chair McCutcheon closed the public hearing at 6:23 p.m. Ressler moved,Peterson seconded,to approve LA 22-000019 text amendment related to docks and easements for docks in the seasonal Recreational Zoning(RS)district.VOTE: Ayes: 7,Nays 0. 5. A22-000021 TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO EXTERIOR STORAGE IN R DISTRICTS RELATING TO VEHICLE PARKING SURFACES. THE ORDINANCE WOULD REQUIRE VEHICLES TO BE LICENSED,OPERABLE,AND PARKED ON A HARD SURFACE. (STAFF: JEREMY BARNHART) Barnhart stated this text amendment is intended to clarify the regulation for the general user who may not understand the nuances of the City Code.The way the Code is written,extended parking of vehicles is considered hardcover. When the City is reacting to complaints about junk cars or debris, one issue they cite is the expansion of hardcover and some people get confused by that.The idea behind this change is to identify and require that the parking of vehicles be located on hardcover: concrete,asphalt, or gravel. Bollis spoke about the example of boat storage on a larger rural lot,noting someone storing a boat seasonally is now required to put hardcover under that all summer long versus hardcover that would only be there in winter.Bollis sees the intent but does not know that it should be blanket across all R districts. It does not make sense to him, especially in some of those larger districts,to require hardcover under a surface that would be there all the time,whether a boat or RV is stored there or not.He said even with a hobby farm, a tractor parked outside would be considered the same thing. In Bollis' opinion it needs more thought as to what districts this should be in and what the overall effect would be to require this hardcover. Chair McCutcheon opened the public hearing at 6:23 p.m. Daniel Phipps,464 North Shore Drive, asked when they would pursue this issue about the hardcover further. He has a rental house next to him with four vehicles,three boats, and an enclosed trailer on the grass. The boats are there all year long and he considers it an eyesore,as do some of the other neighbors. Page 3 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,May 16,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. He shared that is his input and agreed with the question of where the City will draw the line and where they will not. Mr.Phipps noted enforcement is another matter. Chair McCutcheon asked what zone Mr. Phipps lives in. Mr.Phipps replied the lots are 1/2 acre minus wetland. Greg Hahn was called late this afternoon to represent Mitch and Georgina Rasmussen,living on Park Drive.Mr.Hahn thanked Mr. Barnhart as the family has been after this for two years and shared a handout showing what the neighbors are looking at,noting it varies from day-to-day anywhere from 10- 16 cars.Hardcover is an issue to talk about, as it the number of vehicles on a piece of property that is not even 1/2 acre.The owners have been there for 20-30 years and it changed when the next door neighbor purchased this property which has an accessory building on it. Mr. Hahn believes the building is probably being used for mechanical or fix-up purposes and does not know if there is a license or zoning that needs to be done.Mr. Hahn stated this is an issue as the property owners are both retired and are selling their property. Mr.Hahn is a real estate agent and he suggested talking to the City Planning and Zoning about the number of cars and what is going on next door because it does affect the value of their property. Recently Mr. Rasmussen's health has turned which has accelerated the need to get things moving on the sale of their property,noting the family does not want to prosecute but wants to work with the City to try to rectify the situation as it is an eyesore. Chair McCutcheon closed the public hearing at 6:38 p.m. Ressler asked Barnhart if the text amendment proposed is in reference to considering boats, cars, etcetera, on soft storage to be counted as hardcover. Barnhart replied right now the extended parking of vehicles transfers that area into hardcover.This ordinance says if someone is going to store vehicles they must store them on approved hardcover(asphalt, concrete,gravel). Ressler clarified it is making it unlawful to store said vehicles unless it is on hardcover. Barnhart replied in the affirmative. Chair McCutcheon likes that it indirectly says if one has a smaller lot they will have a restriction on hardcover,therefore they will be less apt to store vehicles.To Bollis' point on the bigger lots, it will promote them to add hardcover and does the City want that impacting their lakes and runoff? Bollis asked if it were approved,how would it apply to existing non-conformities such as the example the gentleman just explained about the next door neighbors. Barnhart replied this ordinance will not help him as most of those vehicles are parked on hard surface such as gravel or concrete.The same rules apply, licensed and operable,so those three tests would still be met.He noted with any change to the Zoning Code people would be grandfathered in but if someone moved that vehicle and brings it back it must be parked on hard surface. Peterson said from the two neighbors sharing their experiences with cars,those cars seem to be a much bigger issue and are giving the neighborhood a black eye.He would be sympathetic to someone who has Page 4 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,May 16,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. a recreational small utility trailer as he does not believe that is causing a problem as the cars do. He asked if they can address this to cars and not just hardcover? Barnhart noted Peterson raises a point: it seems the predominant issue is the parking of vehicles that are operated sparingly.As a lake community,Barnhart knows there is a culture of one storing a boat off to the side so it is not impactful of neighbors. He stated perhaps they can revise this with some more direction and bring it back specific to cars or specific to zoning districts. Ressler knows they have looked at this language before and have come to an impasse due to enforcement. If a boat moves three feet it has been moved and it is no longer there for a long enough period of time.He said there is intent and enforcement and he believes that is the difficulty they are experiencing. Regarding Peterson's comment about cars versus a trailer, one could make the opposite argument with kids home from college but are not keeping several trailers. He thinks this is a difficult one to get through and sees there are merits and there are not merits. Kirchner understands the intent but in looking at the photo examples brought forward tonight,based on the photos the vehicles are all parked on hardcover.He asked Barnhart if complaints prompted this and if they were complaints similar to those brought tonight,passing an ordinance like this will not correct it. That does not seem like the best route. Barnhart replied occasionally they City gets complaints about junk cars. One section of Code they would be in violation of is how they park that car for an extended period of time and falls under the definition of hardcover.He noted an example where one had an extension of hardcover without a permit which is one section of Code that the City cites. It is difficult to get a judge or prosecuting attorney to agree with or accept because it is somewhat written in the negative. What the City is trying to do is clarify that a bit. It will not apply in all cases as there are certain situations where other issues can be used such as inoperable cars,license,etcetera. In certain situations this is one of the options the City has in terms of enforcement. With all Code enforcements it is based on a complaint,the City will go out to see what sections of the Code they are in violation of, and then will write a letter letting the property owner know what the rule is. If they choose to fix it that is great,if not,the City will take the next step. Kirchner has some concern that it will not solve at least one of the complaints they heard this evening. In his previous career in law enforcement he has experience enforcing junk vehicle ordinances that are specific to inoperable or unlicensed,and for what it is worth he would stick with that rather than trying to include additional language or violations of hardcover.He would defer to the ordinance that speaks to inoperable,unlicensed,or unregistered vehicles. Libby noted they had two public comments showing why people are upset about having errant, abandoned,or unattended vehicles on private property that can be unattractive and distracting. He thinks the draft amendment includes three elements on how to deal with that.The most difficult part,as Kircher's point was well taken in terms of law enforcement, it can keep the City police department busy making sure there is current registration on any and every vehicle that is parked for any lengthy period of time. Still it is a good component of the draft that Libby thinks should be there;the three caveats or elements of the draft amendment stipulate the vehicle must be licensed,operable,and parked on a hard surface.He does not think the hard surface is a bad idea in any way and thinks the draft amendment in its intent and language is practical and would serve public good. Libby is in favor of what the planners brought forward. Page 5 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,May 16,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. Chair McCutcheon can see for a citizen being impacted this would be very frustrating and understands why they would come to Staff requesting something be done.At the same time,he sees the complications and policing of it as a problem and can see the larger lot impact and noted there will be pushback on that. They should think of having hardcover unnecessarily placed in the larger,more rural areas of Orono. Things to consider also include the fact that they are a community of boat trailers and whether it is an issue of cars and unlicensed cars,and the burden on the police department. Barnhart has heard reasonable comments and a good range of discussion and has identified three options: approve as written,deny as written,or direct Staff to come back with revisions. The Commissioners continued discussion on the item including hardcover definitions,long-term storage, and seasonal storage. Peterson asked regarding the earlier complaint regarding cars, if it is suspected that someone is running a repair garage,could they go to Staff to address the issue? Barnhart noted there is an ordinance in the books against car repair home occupations.The challenge is proving it. Libby moved,Bollis seconded,to table A22-000021 text amendment and to direct Staff to come back with a revision to the text amendment.VOTE: Ayes: 7,Nays 0. 6. LA22-000022 TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING VEGETATION REMOVALS IN THE SHORELAND OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT.THE ORDINANCE RELATES TO THE REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS AND DISEASED TREES.(STAFF: JEREMY BARNHART) Barnhart explained there is a distinction between live and dead trees.Removal of a live tree in the shoreline area requires a replacement at a ratio established by the Planning Commission and City Council some years ago.The important distinction is"live"which requires replacement versus"dead"which does not require replacement.Recently the question has come up regarding aa hazardous tree which is going to fall down in the opinion of an arborist, and property owners have asked if they can remove that tree. Barnhart clarified yes they can,but they need to replace the tree due to the way the Code currently reads. It is the same with a diseased tree.Barnhart clarified there is really no discretion on the Staff level,either a tree is alive or dead.This ordinance clarifies that a bit and an item for discussion is whether diseased or hazardous trees should be required to be replaced at the same ratio of a live tree or at a reduced ratio. Barnhart is looking for feedback from the Planning Commission. Chair McCutcheon opened the public hearing at 7:17 p.m. Jay Nygard, 1446 Rest Point Road,has a huge tree by the lake as well as other trees and asked for a clarification.He rioted Mr. Barnhart sent him an email that said this was potentially going to say one could replace a diseased tree with nothing and he asked if that has changed. Barnhart replied he has drafted an ordinance with two options. One has no replacement required for diseased,dead,or pose a safety hazard.An alternative text requires the replacement of a tree one-to-one. Mr.Nygard thanked Barnhart and said that is helpful.Personally he thinks saying something is a diseased tree and that they do not have to do anything is ridiculous.He has a problem next door which Mr. Page 6 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,May 16,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. Barnhart knows about where a neighbor cut down a tree, disposed of it,and then had an arborist sign something later noting it was diseased. He asked how does anyone know?Mr.Nygard knows because he took the bottom stump when it was left on the street and knows it was not diseased. Having an ordinance as Mr.Barnhart was saying where no tree replacement is required goes completely against what Orono has been all these years in protecting the lake. Especially in looking at the 75 foot setback rather than the 50 foot setback of the DNR,they have one-third of the lakeshore on Lake Minnetonka and it is actually important that Orono maintains that. Mr.Nygard got a tree replacement permit next door when he bought that house because the tree was destroying the boathouse by the lake and the City came and said yes, it is healthy,but it should be replaced. Therefore,Mr.Nygard went through a tree replacement plan,which he thinks is a bit ridiculous as it would have required him to put eight trees in a line in a certain area.This broaches many of the topics the Commissioners brought up today.Mr.Nygard negotiated a different settlement with the City and will not need eight trees and he put them in a good spot where it fits in which worked quite well. What he sees missing here is an actual forestry expert talking about the forests of Lake Minnetonka. They cannot leave it up to residents and a few arborists,but they must talk about the fact that Orono owns one-third of Lake Minnetonka and how do they protect the forest as a whole? Chair McCutcheon closed the public hearing at 7:21 p.m. Ressler recalls in talking about greenspace there is a certain species approval of trees,knowing the City cannot be experts at everything, so they defer that expertise to the DNR and other entities.He does not see the benefit of replacing a Cottonwood or nuisance tree and requiring a replacement, especially if it was diseased.Regarding a perfectly healthy nuisance tree, Ressler noted those would be replanted by the laws and rules in place. McCutcheon noted they make seedless Cottonwood trees now. He likes the idea of putting in a setback for the tree and asked Staff if the tree would be replaced in the lake setback or anywhere on the lot.He stated they may find out that every tree is diseased in some way or another and definitely do not want to promote that. Kirchner does not like lines 15 and 16 in the proposal and would not support. The alternative text that would require replacement of dead,diseased,or hazardous is something he would support more than not replacing a tree.Regarding public comments tonight regarding placement of trees,there are circumstances that do not allow for replacement in that area. He suggested including language saying a tree would be replaced in the same location or allow for an administrative review with Staff to allow for extenuating circumstances,almost like practical difficulties.He would like to keep it administrative rather than bringing those before the Planning Commission for approval. Erickson said besides the lakeshore erosion possibility,certain types of oak wilt are transmitted through their roots which may be another reason a property owner may not want to replant in the same spot. Bollis noted the way he reads the existing Code,the City does not address dead or diseased trees.At first he was in favor of lines 15 and 16 only and in choosing lines 30-32 it would give the owner and Staff some flexibility on where to place that tree within the lake setback. Barnhart and the Commissioners discussed the language options in the ordinance. Kirchner moved,Ressler seconded,to approve LA22-000022 text amendment regarding vegetation removals in the Shoreland Overlay Zoning District including lines 30-33,alternative text requiring Page 7 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,May 16,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. replacement of dead,diseased trees deemed hazardous and directing Staff to incorporate an administrative review process regarding replacement location of the tree as suggested by Staff. VOTE: Ayes: 7,Nays 0. OTHER BUSINESS 7. UPDATE ON MAY 9,2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Barnhart shared the City Council reviewed several items approving the variances at 1074 Loma Linda and 940 North Arm Drive.Regarding 1720 Bohns Point Road,after much discussion the City Council approved the amended plans for the retaining walls. Feedback was provided to Stonewood for the boundary line adjustment. ADJOURNMENT Ressler moved,Kirchner seconded,to adjourn the Planning Commission Meeting.VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. The Orono Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 7:41 p.m. ATTEST: / S hair AIM 'edir-11127"/ Page 8 of 8 • Date Application Received: 04/20/22 O�l Date Application Considered as Complete:04/20/22 1_ ` VO 60-Day Review Period Extension Expires: 8/18/22 •••• To: Chair McCutcheon and Planning Commission Members y Adam Edwards, City Administrator Fe G1 4kESHO From: Melanie Curtis, Planner hIGG Date: 21 June 2022 Subject: #LA22-000024,Sharratt Design o/b/o the owner"3350 Fox Street LLC" 3350 Fox Street Guest House CUP Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a guest house conditional use permit. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicant wishes to construct an addition over the existing detached garage to function as a guest house.The property is just over 7 acres in area within the LR-1A zoning district where 2.0 • acres is the minimum size.A conditional use permit (CUP) is required for the guest house use.A minimum of 4.0 acres is required for a guest house use in this district. Applicable Regulations: Plumbing in the Accessory Building CUP (Section 78-303) The applicant is proposing to construct a second story addition over the existing oversized detached garage to serve as a guest house use. A guest house uses requires a conditional use permit. The±1,300 square foot building is conforming with respect to size and location. Applicable Regulation:Conditional Use Permit(Section 78-916) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a Conditional Use Permit(CUP) as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted,the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: 1) Consistent with the community management plan;The proposed use is residential in nature and residential uses are consistent with the CMP guiding for this property. 2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; The proposed accessory building improvements including the guest house use are compliant with the zoning ordinance. 3) Adequately served by police,fire, roads, and stormwater management;The proposed use will be adequately served by existing services and facilities. 40 FILE#LA22-000024 21 June 2022 Page 2 of 3 4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; The property is served by sewer and a private well.The applicant is aware that the septic system must be upsized at the time of building permit.This criterion is met. 5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; This criterion is met. 6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; The proposed guest house is residential in character and its use is expected to be compatible with the surrounding area. 7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The guest house is residential in visual character and is expected to be compatible with the principal building on the property and the surrounding area. 8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The architectural styling of the guest house will be residential-looking in character and consistent with that of the principal building on the Property. 9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; The proposed use is not expected to have any adverse impacts. No information has been presented to indicate such. 10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; The guest house use will be in the existing detached garage and it is situated in conforming location.The guest house will not be • significantly visible when viewed from off the Property,and the views from the neighbors will be screened by existing vegetation and the physical separation. In the opinion of staff,additional screening or buffering is not necessary. 11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise,glare,vibration, odors,fumes, dust, electrical interference,general unsightliness, or other means; The proposed guest house use is not expected to cause any of these undesirable impacts. 12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties,traffic congestion, or unsafe access; It is anticipated that the proposed use will not generate any of these undesirable issues. 13) Designed to take into account the natural,scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; The guest house is designed to conform to the residence on the property, and will not have a negative environmental impact. 14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; Applicant is hereby advised of this requirement; and 15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare.This criterion is met. The CUPs may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Further approval shall be granted only when the following criteria are met: 1. Regarding the guest house CUP,the lot is at least two times the minimum lot area required by this section; and . FILE#LA22-000024 21 June 2022 Page 3 of 3 2. The guest house is for the sole use of the occupants of the principle dwelling, including their domestic employees and nonpaying guests. 3. The council finds that the proposed use of the pool cabana with a shower will not be detrimental to the residential character of the neighborhood. 4. The council finds that the plumbing fixtures proposed in the cabana are in keeping with the applicants' intended use of the accessory building. 5. The property owner agrees to the filing of a covenant in the title of the property providing that the accessory buildings will not be: a. Used for a home occupation unless specifically approved by the city or if allowed by this Code. b. Used as a dwelling unless a guest house conditional use permit is obtained. c. Rented, leased or otherwise provided for use as a dwelling under any circumstances. Additionally,the CUPs shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner as allowed by the Zoning Code? • 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the approval, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval conditioned upon the property owner's agreement to the filing of a covenant in the title of the property assuring that the guest house will not be used for a home occupation unless specifically approved by the city or if allowed by Code; and will not be rented, or leased under any circumstances. Staff recommends an additional condition of approval that the existing 5-bedroom septic system be upgraded appropriately to serve the additional bedrooms in the guest house. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application & Narrative Exhibit B. Existing Survey Exhibit C. Existing Garage Elevations Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Aerial Views Exhibit F. Property Owners List Exhibit G. Plat Map Exhibit H. 60-day Extension Exhibit I. Septic Compliance Report • 5/25/22,2:53 PM Permit List I Citizenserve PC Exhibit A Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 04/20/2022 • Address: 3350 Fox Orono,MN 55356 Parcel Number: 0511723440008 Land Use Number: LA22-000024 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: 3350 Fox Street LLC Address: 3350 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 Applicant: Name: Nora Kirkwold Company: Sharratt Design& Company Address: 464 Second St. Excelsior,MN 55331 nkirkwold@sharrattdesign.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: • Associated Contact: Project Description: Guest House CUP -Addition of living quarters above detached garage Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit LA Site Plan Application ' 1 Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception ? Vacation Application I. Variance Application i..J Applicant Signature: • https://www7.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController 1/1 sharra tt • des n C O nt I) a ti :s' 04-20-22 3350 Fox St., Orono,Mn 55356 Our client, recently became the new owners of the home on 3350 Fox Street. They appreciate the breath- taking views of Lake Minnetonka from the site as well as some of the old-world charm that comes with this 1920's brick estate. Their number one aim is to respect the rich history of the site and home. One of their desires, however,is to create a living space above their existing detached garage for when they would occasionally have guests overnight. The original door of the main house was reincorporated into the back façade of the garage. They want to keep all 4 sides of the brick garage intact and merely build on top of the garage except for adding a new wood plank door to match the existing that would have direct access to the living quarters above. The new hip roof would be steeper than the existing roof (more in keeping with the main home) and would rise from where the old roof began. The space above would be contained under this roof and 4 stucco dormers similar to the dormers on the main house are located on each façade to add interest as well as create the necessary head room. This creates a feeling of IDthe structure being more of a story and a half vs. a full 2 stories. As you can see from the bird's eye view photo with the new roof superimposed, our clients want to make sure that the remodeled garage will feel like it blends in seamlessly with the rest of the estate. Every effort will be made to copy details from the main home. The roof will be a slate hipped roof with relatively short overhangs to match the existing home, the walls will be brick and stucco in identical colors as the main home,the windows will be the same turquois color and will have divided lights in proportions that are similar to the main home. The shutters have been added to all the windows on the second floor and will match the existing color and style of the shutters on the main floor. We believe that this addition ties in perfectly with the house and pool building and respects the original vintage architecture while at the same time creating the function needed to accommodate their guests. • 4 6 4 Second Street • Suite 1 0 0 • Excelsior , MN 5 5 3 3 1 p h o n e : 9 5 2 . 4 7 0 . 9 7 5 0 • fax : 9 5 2 . 4 7 0 . 8 4 0 7 website : s h a r r a t t d e s i g n . c o m • email : info@sharrattdesign . com • I • PC Exhibit B ivCERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR A--en FOX STREET S�c� P NANCY BIGOS a-: • s Th-WW ..---OJ OF LOT 4,BLOCK 1,FULLERTON ESTATES ags_ = S soma ao^e � �� HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA E i$ Ili- 77-- --7---"z -- t:--1 \ ''''' '10 _ .` 5 0 1WV o, I,' Ill '' ',C. /___--- t. % of * -171-17-11 . l 1 \ ♦- .,611.i.:1:111) 111 N �� '' SCALE IN FEE1\ ;\g ��' - -0- 5 L -- , ¢ 4 ti { A-.±. A • .r 14 JE - opt".` — B i jam_ — -,--,=----,9<:i°3 1144;7 -� ,�� `=k,�e a iA - moi. � __ '� .% LEGAL OESCRIFOON OF MACES, T.!41 :, _ yLa.,Mock 1.wxa,ax u.A,n 81 8 i\ \\ 1 i °.j 1- 0 B E 0._.i: _. .,,.1.y°.��a. t•wm �..o a. '� P ,1\ ��-- y —�_/.f.-:,,,..--- _ _ m °a, N LAKE MINNETONKA MAXWELL BAY ° #3593 ' • • 11 PC Exhibit C — clesi 1 _,.... _ SHEET INDEX IIETALVE0 GARAGE ; ... .-. C III: I- U , 2 /..... ,,,,.__.,..., 01 .,,, Z PROJECT TEAM C l.) ARCHITECT .7.7.7;g1T:ZAT,1"" '' ..,............,, • C] STRUCTURAL ENGINEER II 'c I- ------------li;--:;:-a---------'-------"- c, GENERAL CONTRACTOR _., 2 OR PLAN r ... ISSUED FOR 1 it f 111 1 -;—1/4 I IIIIIRI I , I Iffin 111111111 11111111 I 1 FRONT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION ........... .... ..... IL OL a. _ -- - .,_ --- _-- ._.„, , - -- 3350 FOX _-- .......„. STREET,I.-LC -.m-• I l iaf...-L E , SHEET 0 ury.ER n Main li 0-•-`-'''''' - REAR ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION . • - 1., t a ila a is . _. ....`w__ �_...._.. � aL,.. fr may. '41' * ' Y i "w y. .. , 00110 ".74'.1‘. o-n .- 1 ;r -' s ..- ,. .te ..ai % B^T �‘ s • • .. r .. ..., ... A .iii' • 0 PC Exhibit D E3'I. es n �a.� 1 ^ 0 1 e SHEET INDEX iiii- Po _..,a. .ti._ .,. I . ,® • rwrerT. PROJECT TEAM J I AaumeCr tO MAIN`EVEL FLCOR PLAN %STRUCTURAL ENGI •GENERAL CONTRACTOR 3 iji-- i s lhiii n` NIB 3 Sll t yij�i N - 1! •aa � II O „cs 4is¢a. liti III,' Er 11, 1 -.�.,....... i laroax a. um..e. i , o n III -, .ate v _ rn� -- i' �V _ r i .. v I II 3350 FOX 1 I ma-��� 44111gr --' o i STREETnLLC iAdIL 0:APER LEVEL - --.-.._ EMI ...... ! -- s • ,\ __ N ../- /.;,, ,..„,, design V ,. 7 N. . . . N7 . . . . ,.. SHEET INDEX • \ \ ''' 1 .....mie,‹ \ . d li.1.Rj—.......-i:: ,.-.. \ /I I ....,/ C- -V ------ A,xcrc:a - .4 1........a ...,......A- I -41 IN,,-!ILiu .1:Iliiiii.., ri, g 1 mo i tui JIL. IlL ' 1!1 ijrckaacr I 1. :I: ..„„,„,.„,. MENTIJIMIMIll 1 I fii1111Th IllifilfITIT '1 .... — 4 4. PROJECT TEAM MOTE.THE EXISTMG HOY.EMT.1.14..110.1 HT.FROM GRADE TO NIGHEIIT RIDGE Ul 3....- .ARCHITECT 0 .EvAriox 0 I„.r.ELEVATION e.cscret+.53,, i ET17.11CTLRAL ENGINEE-R •ac 411L3 ,GENERAL CONTRACTOR reo - A ' ISSUED FOR /7 ..[,7 . ', ; ° s\\71' ..,1,...., !ININI / / / \ . .,\, / // , 4 oaaao,a2Ermr.wilmmam / \ / // ‘11.11111117' — --- ,— '7111111171 I I' &A • / puma. i asr.x.F._,,,ca ru'itrj -c 3350 FOX ... 114 i1 • STREET LLC 1 110111. 1..!,) 1-7 TM' ------''F.-1- ' , •ow- M1llSIEET 0 SIVISE12 ...Z.MC...........-.,`...Tr......7.....if.r.Z.,- 0 Ufa&ELEVATION 0 TIT 0 • , Allillik SHEET INDEX ..,_11 wmk 1 1 ,_ , ...,....._ .53 51.5.559 55 5.-5555 ., -5 --5 A,1/55555 A , .imin Illima., ,..,._. 111. ,,..... ......... .s , n 1 -- 1 -- : --- 1 I File Meal ESTIM .1 IIIIII, 11 011al671 ill- - 11414l14 'rvi-01 4 PROJECT TEAM InWiti-FPflialiiitiliFgRill,-1-1WilTO-• '`-',V-' rr.-94-1 ' TF,ilii''Y 4.Y ; 77-1-iiit*3 fil"iii..' 0 SECTION THROUGH KITCHEN 0 SECTION THROUGH BATH Oh SECTION THROUGH STAIRS-'' ' -AOCHITECT 41 STRUCILRAL ENGI T.. U 00050 5555.15,55/ ...A. In II %GENERA-CONTRACTOR -,„ / h 1 .,,..... , ISSUED FOR Allii Allill ...1111k. 9 . .i. Amor ,.,1, 111111 $ MIRO • NEI ..11 ilE1 11' ..,..,"Err2M7EZIREM 1 a I= a 4111 11111111111111111E1"31:11111111111111111111111 I IIIIIIIII . __„„......, .1 .1. 1 iii i •1 . 111 Ul : IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII6- 1 OBTA01170 GARAGE A 7 If 3350 FOX g 111111111111 t-,-, .$_9141-2-11 ; nmn--,W4$,,t. ,;lifT +,ii 1 _....,., 0 5,61BET NUMBER, (1)!!?T1014 THROUGH LIMO 0 LONGITUDINAL SECTION .••••••••=1•......P. 0 0 A JO at II t . all .,,,ry +^� ,�.,,.r..✓ .-",----,---.7-7.,_,. .;-- --'-`.,37:23''"-_, ='J�,".. _ r yi Jt_ y ` .p , ✓Y. illb "II 4. • ". p 1 14 ill, � S. ' -0 -- ,-r y II ���~ �� f O r , Vis: '_ septi°- >'� " m ,ymr -mo. ' - tis jiV 'viB�'• Jc&'W/..1.1lfJ ° ;1!',;.'.;,...;,:w. ., I9Y ,..&,AF& ,1r 7#ss m a7& 11,0!/,„,...e* t • 0 PC - -•• p-•FExhibit E •`-i•-•-, IfFJPATMSVir --' r:5-.-i.;:t4 -.;'-''',',', •f.' .-''' '' ; 11 V isliTr 11.,‘ -' '..1.t.' N',0t:':A'.-:, . • '''--..- i'l'.!. . ,--v. =-'.. '--..- -4',7-:'''' ' • . 7.:i- A.,,•‘,,......../1"'.''..--*- t., l'i!...!,;,...!!.%3-, ' ''... ..k.'. ,.'', =! .4 -;" , .. ‘ ,;.; *'!!!1!:i •,-...!,;!•- -.-' ---.- 2--.. „-,,...,. !!.! ...t, !.• !,".'" . .-' ' - ! .4-- . - ' ' ''' 44.§....!ii.Niow.7.. . • • _-...... ,,,.•' . , r P -, .,. -'• -, .,.. . v .c. ... ,,, , - •. ,.. ' ,,,,. : * ' ' '.r/,'' ''‘'..' P ;AP: . ' -.; . '•.' .- b . ' 43. ' • "' . 0 .... . ., '' ' e-':i :0,.,':,',.. , i * :' • ./.;"'-'. ..0 --•-:-- — •- ,• .C,--,-..4:41/4",:. -••• ''.41''. ." ` ' *-4; ,, 44-* '!-'''..,,,,-,:;,';',,-'1;,i-'.,`• '';',.. -!'-i'-!"- - . !.! . _ !, ,......, ...- -.41( '4.• • , _.• .• , . 'ia. -,. 4........,•7, ,..,%- f. s. • • , - -. , . . --liiiiih . .• • , A _ !- .-, .- ,t, ,-•ii,„.. ---_:.;e•-• .*-.- • . - :.!If*Ntia.,-," a ' ! .-------., -I is7.. 4/ r- •s 43 s f'- -'''-;! ., !!. ,!! ,,*,, •.:',- . .I,, ;; , , d le.:,-7 .! „t4,1,- . .- ,. !! --,1, i''. • -- ,,i, ,..,.•- II,. •• ,1,,,' . .- . . • • .....- • . • ‘ ,, .. ,.- ..... ,.,. .....ti- • • :,‘„ % • - •,I,. i , : • t ,,; 0--'.'-t/. ' ...„s,..,' '"1 '.:.'...:-:-'41••';',',•-:: - -: (7---- • - :---, /a. •.. Alter ,,:. . . • '' -"4. #4...' • !-- '', ,,, ' ; • •-:: ' ..' •-• !- , `-:: --:"471:..3',' , ., , .,:: . I.' , ..; .::,44.. .:'t „,,,••:- .,-, . -,,..,,.. --•• ::_.....7,3,--.•,•.. -0 ,.-- r. . ----,'k•-.. - .••,--••-ix;,,:-.7•":- -'.,...--..to- ' ;,.....git• 1-, .',1 ..' .. ..:.. , T. . 4 i ',.,1,4-,74, .t i. , ...- -• ,•,4-,--1. -‘. ,-:.,.-. ,.:. ,.. .-' '• (.0X4 . • f. - Zs;... .T• . ., .- .' , , , wil, ,,. , ,. ,, . , ,k,,,z .. ,. .. • . II. ''....' . -,';4'.,,,.,1.......- . " . 1,,.'•:. .3.. ',,,,,,:;....... ',..-•'‘'" ' , ,.r6,•,t-.*,..fi.: ;,'_ • ' • ••.. -,,'„ . , ,..,-,,- .•:.'• - 1"---- " .... . . , ., r- Siptifr-• _ r -:-',-- -ifr.A;-.-',c, .-.4-'-',...- : ''''',.' ',':-.!' '- ': ' ' • - ' - - '• • -.•1 ./,..7.4,•. • ..*,:'.41kli,,,,, ''''' ',..,:' At. ': ..-r"1.:'..,_''''• J.:::: '-",-T-.4,..14r,„ . ;-.0..''..'..'...- . 0•,,- 0-"__,10. - • . :7 ...../. . , ".4'. 't'''.. "•:-. i. ..i 1.*i' ' * ': L'.'1'. : " =-07ri:/' IT'.;:k-'4 .::-i:.',.,:r;i"'''-''':l'./'fr -,:il.i.' .. .": •• •V'' ' ,'10:*: .' ,. - • „7'-t. J-'..:4--%. • `,.:2 x4.: . ....4,..- i...e.„,-., . .,... " •.; 4 -.2.', .....:,,- ..1,77" i'•'!,..s• -..- ••l'. . ",4,/,',-;•., -....,''''--, -in; . • . 40.. . :‘••' „ . -::., '• , -... - .d'i• • -. '. • 1 ,i . =''/..f, ',0,-: '.' ."... ::.. . '4"ir' '..' 4.-''-',4-','.•''.' . :s,,T.,., !'...!!`"''''.... -.,,r.'.''',:- '.T.,,:. ...-',7.• - . IT ..li kt*, f • •. '''.,e.s4P,1%.,:.„_,._9• •°- A46. . - - • 'i.'';:.':':-.'Air. . T., '1.,j:, • • , 4",,0. '-` • ..1Ni.ts• .. '0. . 0 • „ ,fit f,' { f rte »,r i k .t j-- r-4.' XIS 1 ° t 4 ng , c� Q � '^„ TAS^„ ,... :4,,,,i,,,-,. . .-,., 1, �4 Y. , 1- l,,4--, f -'�• ' Y`,t. R .-7”. I ii' 'M1•• :.-- ; .. z y .,,,,,,,-1, ti s r 5 4 k. i.�+""yj d T :Isle ltidsr -. ..,:k!'4 f.a a, r a .jr t. x _ x . • n„ .. ,� ,.: , ------Ntilik, ,v -- "' P. - I III , e ,, T . Iiiv„,,, � i af. - - . „y�� *:ems, • m A Air . ,,,,.,,:‘,......0: { _ �C ' . Y4.1 i,-,-,t -,, -.1,,,,,t,,,,,:: . ' f _ te v :r-'* . 0 • • '_ + Proposed „ ,... , ,., ,,,.., ‘ ,,,7%„,.......t.,-„•- • -,,.. 4, ,,,- . '7-4'4.'40 * `: ml 111 kki'Vfry 1..-,, � t r 'r K �. .n KI.k tai:•`-.r Fis k } ".; -4•,,,,.'-', r T.., z,;.• �k"T + °` k .I• �Y%^ --T"'- . ',.f ° '4Z.,:,:',-0,1". ':r � se .. . to `� r, Fi r 1.1'4%77- _ vim, � .'' - .... �'� t F,i�a �¢•. �� � � ti t ,�•� �,'� fig,. ti � }jilt � �� �� -x.�'_• • -.".'"4" '°y i 4 K x. i .."'•!$.:Rim t r. '`'"'*"K 47:�7,_ „..,„,,,,,,V), T j` "4 r_,,,,,,11 i- y j�. 'r • F C .. ir 7 y 'T " 'Tti' \4 n,., Pt y' -T -�. e •,.!,i. „s e Y >r• .,iy, /� y,, 'gip. �, � ,.••r '`;.. .�;, ! _ - -swab w. 9 �; ' irtir-------, ili i _,, ‘11-Rtilik :,. -. .: 4, ` , ..., ►� .. r4-4 r•- . . - , _ ... _ _ _____ - -,...,r....n.,...,0„........, t .., , iiiti.... n pY� FST ya�ir 32 Y '4 .. "" a.-Mies �qr y a ;�•4..t 0 PC Exhibit F 38 05-117-23 41 0027 38 05-117-23 44 0011 SF REAL ESTATE LLC KYLE DANIEL RUDOLPH 0 3345 FOX ST JORDAN MICHELLE RUDOLPH ORONO MN 55356 3280 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 41 0029 KAREN K WAKE BECKER ET AL 575 OXFORD ROAD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 43 0002 JANE E PICCARD BYRON A PARKER 865 PARTENWOOD RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 43 0005 KEVIN GARNETT 13033 RIDGEDALE D#121 MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 05-117-23 44 0003 WILLIAM L TRUBECK 3300 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 • 38 05-117-23 44 0006 SF REAL ESTATE LLC 3345 FOX ST ORONO MN 55356 38 05-117-23 44 0007 MARCELLINUS HERMANUS M SMITS 3345 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 44 0008 3350 FOX STREET LLC 3350 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 44 0009 HUANG/WANG LIVING TRUST 3320 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 • 38 05-117-23 44 0010 MARCELLINUS HERMANUS M SMITS 3345 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 PC Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Exhibit G Date: 4/21/2022 • is �o • Buffer Size: 500 0 100 200 400 Feet Map Comments: 3350 Fox Street This data O is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii)is furnished with no warranty of any khd; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal, engneering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from thb data. • For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55487/gis.info@hennepn.us PC Exhibit H • From: To: Melanie Curtis "Mike Sharratt" Cc: "Nora Kirkwold" Subject: LA22-000024/3350 Fox Street/60-day Extension Date: Tuesday,May 24,2022 1:32:00 PM Mike Due to placing the application on hold, the City Council may not make a decision on your application within the initial 60 day review period. Therefore the City hereby notifies you that it is extending the time period for City action under Minn. Stat. § 15.99, subd. 3(f). The initial 60-day period would end on June 19th; the time period is now hereby extended until August 18, 2022. This is a routine extension. As we discussed you will be submitting updated plan information. You should submit those updated plans to me by or before June 3rd, if possible to be placed on the June 21st Planning Commission agenda. Please note this is a Tuesday meeting date. Reach out with any questions. Thanks! Melanie V1141W. Melanie Curtis, Planner Direct 952.249.4627 Planning &Zoning Office 952.249.4620 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Email: mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us Website: www.ci.orono.mn.us • All permits and applications are handled through our online portal - LINK! • PC Exhibit MINNESOTA POLLUTION Compliance inspection report form CONTROL AGENCY p p 520 Lafayette Road North Existing Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) St.Paul,MN 55155-4194 Doc Type:Compliance and Enforcement Instructions: Inspection results based on Minnesota Pollution Control Agency(MPGA)requirements and attached supporting documentation—additional local requirements may also apply. Further information can be found here: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wq-wwists4-31a pdf. Inspector must submit completed form to Local Governmental Unit(LGU)and system owner within 15 days of final determination of compliance or noncompliance. Property information Local tracking number: Parcel ID#or Sec/Twp/Range: Local regulatory authority: City of Orono Property address: 3350 Fox Street, Long Lake Owner/representative: Steve Barret Owner's phone: 407-274-3033 Brief system description:reused 1500 gal septic, 2-1600ga1 septic&1000gallon pump tank with a mound system System status System status on date(mm/dd/yyyy): 4/20/2021 0 Compliant—Certificate of compliance* ❑ Noncompliant—Notice of noncompliance (Valid for 3 years from report date unless evidence of An imminent threat to public health and safety(ITPHS)must be an imminent threat to public health or safety requiring upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of removal and abatement under section 145,4.04, receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by subdivision 8 is discovered or a shorter time frame exists local ordinance or under section 145A.04 subdivision 8. in Local Ordinance.) Systems failing to protect ground water must be upgraded, *Note: Compliance indicates conformance with Minn. replaced, or use discontinued within the time required by local R. 7080.1500 as of system status date above and ordinance. does not guarantee future performance. • Reason(s)for noncompliance (check all applicable) ❑ Impact on public health(Compliance component#1)—Imminent threat to public health and safety ❑Tank integrity(Compliance component#2)—Failing to protect groundwater ❑ Other Compliance Conditions(Compliance component#3)—Imminent threat to public health and safety ❑ Other Compliance Conditions(Compliance component#3)—Failing to protect groundwater ❑ System not abandoned according to Minn. R. 7080.2500(Compliance component#3)—Failing to protect groundwater ❑ Soil separation(Compliance component#5)—Failing to protect groundwater ❑ Operating permit/monitoring plan requirements(Compliance component#4)—Noncompliant-local ordinance applies Comments or recommendations Certification I hereby certify that all the necessary information has been gathered to determine the compliance status of this system. No determination of future system performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system construction,possible abuse of the system,inadequate maintenance, or future water usage. By typing my name below, I certify the above statements to be true and correct, to the best of my knowledge, and that this information can be used for the purpose of processing this form. Business name: Sewer S icislnc 7.1 Certification number: C1659 Inspector signature: License number: 2502 T rs ocumen as been electr nically signed) Phone: 952-873-3292 Necessary or locally required supporting documentation (must be attached) © Soil observation logs ® Locally required forms ❑ Tank Integrity Assessment ❑ Operating Permit ❑ Other information(list): i https://www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • Use your preferred relay service • Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4-31b • 1/11/21 Page 1 of 4 1. Impact on public health— Compliance component#1 of 5 • Compliance criteria: Attached supporting documentation: System discharges sewage to the 0 Yes el No ❑ Other: ground surface Z Not applicable System discharges sewage to drain 0 Yes- ® No tile or surface waters. System causes sewage backup into !❑Yes' ®No dwelling or establishment. Any"yes"answer above indicates the system is an imminent threat to public health and safety. Describe verification methods and results: Searched for surface outlet or ground discharge Checked for back-up 2. Tank integrity—Compliance component#2 of 5 Compliance criteria: Attached supporting documentation: • System consists of a seepage pit, ❑Yes' ®No ® Pumped at time of inspection cesspool, drywell, leaching pit, or other pit? Name of maintenance business: Sewer Services Sewage tank(s)leak below their I❑Yes' ®No License number of maintenance business: 2502 designed operating depth? Date of maintenance: 4/20/2021 ❑ Existing tank integrity assessment(Attach) Date of maintenance If yes,which sewage tank(s)leaks: (mmkid/yyyy): (must be within three years) Any"yes"answer above indicates the system (See form instructions to ensure assessment complies with is failing to protect groundwater. Minn. R. 7082.0700 subp. 4 8(1)) ❑Tank is Noncompliant(pumping not necessary-explain below) — — ❑ Other: Describe verification methods and results: Pumped&Inspected • https://www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • Use your preferred relay service • Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4-31b • 1/11/21 Page 2 of 4 3. Other compliance conditions— Compliance component#3 of 5 3a. Maintenance hole covers appear to be structurally unsound(damaged,cracked,etc.),or unsecured? • ❑Yes' ®No 0 Unknown 3b. Other issues(electrical hazards,etc.)to immediately and adversely impact public health or safety?0 Yes- ( l No 0 Unknown *Yes to 3a or 3b-System is an imminent threat to public health and safety. 3c. System is non-protective of ground water for other conditions as determined by inspector? ❑Yes' ®No 3d. System not abandoned in accordance with Minn. R. 7080.2500? 0 Yes' ®No *Yes to 3c or 3d-System is failing to protect groundwater. Describe verification methods and results: Inspected Attached supporting documentation:® Not applicable ❑ 4. Operating permit and nitrogen BMP* —Compliance component#4 of 5 ® Not applicable • Is the system operated under an Operating Permit? 0 Yes 0 No If"yes",A below is required Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP specified in the system design? 0 Yes 0 No If"yes",B below is required BMP=Best Management Practice(s)specified in the system design If the answer to both questions is "no'; this section does not need to be completed. Compliance criteria: a. Have the operating permit requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. Is the required nitrogen BMP in place and properly functioning? ❑ Yes ❑ No Any "no"answer indicates noncompliance. Describe verification methods and results: Attached supporting documentation: ❑ Operating permit(Attach) ❑ • https://www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • Use your preferred relay service • Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4-31b • 1/11/21 Page 3 of 5. Soil separation — Compliance component #5 of 5 • Date of installation 11/1/2011 ❑ Unknown (mm/ddlyyyy) Shoreland/Wellhead protection/Food ® Yes ❑ No Attached supporting documentation: beverage lodging? ❑ Soil observation logs completed for the report(Attach) Compliance criteria(select one): ❑ Two previous verifications of required vertical separation(Attach) 5a.For systems built prior to April 1, 1996, ❑Yes 0 No' and not located in Shoreland or Wellhead ❑ Not applicable(No soil treatment area) Protection Area or not salving a food, beverage or lodging establishment: ❑ _______ Drainfield has at least a two-foot vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock. 5b.Non-performance systems built April 1, ®Yes 0 No Indicate depths or elevations 1996, or later or fornon-performance systems located in Shoreland or Wellhead! A. Bottom of distribution media 15" Protection Areas or serving a food, B. Periodically saturated soil/bedrock 21"design beverage, or lodging establishment borin_ Drainfield has a three-foot vertical _C. System separation36" separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock* D. Required compliance separation* f 36" *May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by Local Ordinance. 5c.'Experimental", 'Other", or "Performance" ❑ Yes ❑ No' systems built under pre-2008 Rules; Type IV or V systems built under 2008 • Rules 7080. 2350 or 7080.2400 (Advanced Inspector License required) Drainfield meets the designed vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock. *Arty "no"answer above indicates the system is failing to protect groundwater. Describe verification methods and results: Boring 1-1-12" 10yr 2/2 Loam 13-25"10 yr 4/4 Clay Loam No Redox Upgrade requirements: (Minn. Stat. § 115.55)An imminent threat to public health and safety(1TPHS)must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance. If the system is failing to protect ground water, the system must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance. If an existing system is not failing as defined in law, and has at least two feet of design soil separation, then the system need not be upgraded, repaired, replaced, or its use discontinued, notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more strict. This provision does not apply to systems in shoreland areas, Wellhead Protection Areas, or those used in connection with food, beverage, and lodging establishments as defined in law. • https://www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • Use your preferred relay service • Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4-31b • 1/11/21 Page 4of4 02/21/12 09:59 OLSONCONSTRUCTION 9524485289 p.02 1 c.a —7 tro . • ' I -n° 0 c"' 1' - c, ,•,_. rt* x r. o) •-, r.- \ @ ..4.41 ,1 : . cza (...A .N ( . -- . . • . . i , ....sN ,....t, . , —,---- V I i .,.! '• IMP- •- -• . --. f4 S.., .0......• % N (..Pc., i A •,..J th 0-7, ‘...) . ... ..._ A' . . • .. • F . \.....-: ..4— c. SZ -----1 (7.5 . ,.,....) •,•‘-) vi n D . .../ ..---..' .------49 .......- - 1.::"‘ t . Ft1 ..... ....; ,_..........,.. (i.,...z S,,.• .N. ri--- CY v.,.. : N •4. )t‘. M t .-1-- .., ys•.... e- —:N. N' LA 0 `..c — o () A it ......\ ••••• 1,4 9/I /04K A c_•-•$:,1 I C' .-.4::' C2e1F1' Ttl rg7 Z: A a c, C2 i; 4.••••• "7Fr ‘79/.7" -> r/0 . • 1 sL- TIME se-/-- D CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN /0—Ii '1 /}-j} • INSPECTION NOTI/�J''E DD�� _ SCHEDULED 1 f—/—// /1)•, " PERMIT NO. 2a`` COMPLETED r ADDRESS 3350 O- ST OWNER ---__.--- -_ _. _-_----------_-____--__TELEPHONE NO. 452 4q?"1204 CONTRACTOR .__121-541.-Yck _ ---DESCRIPTION ------_—_-- C] FOOTING O PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ POURED WALL 0 MECHANICAL RI 0 LAKESHORE/WETLANDS y p FRAMING 0 MECHANICAL FINAL 0 TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ INSULATION 0 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP 0 PROGRESS ti ❑ FINAL Li SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT ''1 ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP i ❑ DEMO-FINAL SEPTIC INSTALL O HARD COVER REMOVAL ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL. ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL Z OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU: YES _NO NO oy COMMENTS: ac W C • o i2 - fcoa 6.., tS. o ,�.1/4, 6o --1---/A. , ics ct O / OrJv -�S. . r/ /4.. l< W Q / '(• 6, =3 20 c 413ed W k ii . Pc) 1 __ P e p ICS, Cd -45 cc O 1){y�VORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED i i PROJECT COMPLETE W IX [_1 CO RECT WORK&PROCEED ' ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY CII I') CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY 0 tJ BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT 0 CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ) ) PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN I ) STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ' J CITATION ISSUED i 1 INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 Owner/Contractor on siteL... • Inspector. ..4.1 White Copy/Inspector's File Canary Copy/Site Notice 4. MOUND SUING ,V 1--647- - /C' (,, c') • A. Calculate Cle4n Sand Lift:: 3 feet minus Depth to Limiting C 1 - .-•. . • a -4 3.0 ft •I 2.1 1 ft - I 1.0 Ift C rsign Sand Lift(optional): 1.25 I B. Calculate Upslope Height:Clean sand Lift (4-A)+media de,rth (1 ft.)+cover (1 ft.)=Upslope Height I1.3 ] ft +I1.O1 ft • 1.0 _Ift= C 3.3 ft 11.;4.`,h.....p.. ;;u' 1431r , I rlerid Slope 11 : I o 1 7 :5 1,c I u'I r:1 11 '1 J.14 '.'5 1-5.t _1L+,.(.1'' ,1 111 i lc _ di , C. 11 _ _ ;1 cl'1•. I:..,. .', a:�I:-:12.:',.::II_7 - • .1.: 'Th :Y,2D' ICI I1'� . '?'• ..5 I ., 1 ;� I;y 1' •%1I -.1 E. Ur rt ' , 3 -TT J `,-. .°S ,.?1:.5i:1:.!.0 2.1,:.:s 12.?S.2.21; 1E 2 ...:;? :0:i. ,fSi I F•'rlrt t ,:I i.3'-(3?J'i.5-�)?�i:3i�i.iel. li? �:- ;�� LLneslopr 1'`. 1 I ' • ; 7 J 1 . 1 r i 1. I n . ti,1 1: I I)-,6 j Ii 1 i I'Yi i') 'r3 IC:,, 20 , 11 *, 21 1:'{ c' :WI I ,,1: I:("., 'Jr .tfi1:i P.1,-..-:',3 5:' , 3E05 ES: ;--,.I_: -h .,. c _ Is ::"15.551 i.Lt !; ;5.:-}5 '-1:..,".i:•l•,2;T 5:!i:e'1; P.n•11: '1 I''-i:, :I:P...1..)./ 4. :11f'I �%hii 55. ,,,G.?i`55x1~1:�i.tiz1:1a.52iti'>:ili'.i-.1IV.>•1il.i:i:1•1'1: - 11: 'J ,.:311'0 ' _ G Select Upslope perm Multiplier (based on land slope): 3.33 (figure t-34) D. Calculate Upsfope Berm Width:Multiplier (4.C)X Upslope Mound Height (4.B)in Upslope Berm Width I 3.33 ft x[ 3.3 ft = 10.8 ft E. Calculate Drop in Elevation Under Bed'tied Width (2.B) X I.ond Slope (1.D)+100=Drop (ft) I10.0 I ft x I_ 5.0 % + 100= I 0.50 Jft F, Calculate Downslope Mound Height: Upslope Height (4.B)+ Drop in Elevation (4.E)a Downslope Height I3.3 I ft +[ 0.50 ft = 3.8 ft Select Downslope Berm Multiplier G. (based on land slope): I 5.00 I(figure 11-34) H.Calculate Downstope Berm Width:Multiplier (4.G)X Down lope Height (4.F)■Downslope Berm Width .$ ft = 18.8 ft 5.00 x 3 • I [ � C I, Calculate Minimum Berm to Cover Absorption Area:Downs ape Absorption Width (3.B or 3.C)+4 ft.=ft 17.0 Ift + [ 4 ft = 21.0 ft J. Design Downslope Berm =greater of 4H and 41; [ 21.0 ft K. Select Endslope Berm Multiplier: I 4.00 ((usually 3.0 or 4.0) L Calculate Endslope Berm (4.K)X Downslope Mound Height (4.F)=Endslope Berm Width I 4.00 Ift x[ 3.8 ft . 15.0 ft M.Calculate Mound Width: Upslope Berm Width(4.0)+Bed K idth (2.8)+Downslope Berm Width (4.J)=ft 10.8 -I ft +I 10 0 I ft + 21.0 ft = 41,8 ft N. N.Calculate Mound Length: Errdsiope Berm W'Yidth (4.L)+Bea Length (2.C)+Endslope Berm Width (4.1)o ft 15.0 ft + 63 0 I ft + 15.0 ft =_ 93.0 ft 0. If using a registered product,enter the Component Length: in. -: 11 ft. , P. If using a registered product,enter the Component Width: t_ in. + 12 t ft. 0. Number of Components per Row =Bed Length (2.C)divide d by Component Length (4.0) (Round up) i 63 1 y L_ - R. Number of Rows _Bed Width (2.5)divided by Component Width (4.P)(Round up) Adjust Contour Loading Rate on Design Summary page untl this number is a whole number 1 s. Total Number of Components =Number of Components pr•r Row X Number of Rrmc • • r•„; r r • 1 a ° o c u=.. i` E >t ` r NV }� 3 1 W ,7 5 1 1 L I L_ T [ C h id t rr U V M N O l!1 O V 1 4., Q; g Le Y i 4 + isi i & * rt ri 0 VI E K L./ a a' 0 0 $ c O t i•-• c r N A J r m ” o a ® o c 0 2 • 0 t% �._ ❑ ❑ O _-- ___.V-_.— -' b a V 9 a a, V! m � 8 - aa a• aV `�`' n m v _ •O •, u c 'o_ 7� O� O 1:1 12 tn 0- 0 E 0. M • 8 5. t. r�.r tm A 'D co m _ tilto �C 0 Z 9 r r nt U 12 ❑ ❑vi v°i 1 c N m Y~ u Fs Y 8'' 6 8'' a E c E a u 7 w 03 LA A A OG i. 0 e7 E a _ I b A o r ril L. o JI S om I H , 1 4713 W z RI t7. I>*0 u _ on :� i , .o i1 ' Cil g 4 a o , 1 .• • f I I, Sm 1 e; C u , .. CI t1+ !- G Lit_ - [; ',. ez s.'� '- N.O V • • -FE - - �, ; d� m O0 iI 0 •' 41 ' y d v V ; i;. p o ! no N .^ti v1 y ''^ 01 � ! ai A 1 6 U W d▪ iat . & vo. p j ` a m �� I m Q 1 be i. ...... .. . J t a ° Q 4a o o I C i L r.°0. I c I -Ti t i^ A 7- ri ^— c �I CO v O J K. o i 11eff 8I o ro s' • N � .0 d r` drib • 4—, �p lNj I �j 1 C 'Q a 0 al C "Oi ❑ Q nl io I u . .. _.. G U i u A. ht "N C v, i • s o ❑ a in. i Eb. I I 1 ....1., g f --- ^ C e V Y .� o a u, V .o 0 o 3 v ° o x L 4. a e • " a O IA13 M ra • '11FCI 8 0 3 tJ u`. t o 1r . ° I I.. Ln EI v E 1 o a, F tii �Mr •i- E. Z v O U E p Ir'tl 7 E E 'i7 `V qL ,,, I 5 x 9 c $ Y, c ao a, CA hr ▪ --- N TA •• 1- ig .� u E w o � �o c _ c Y T �'1 '� c I y�q o r*� ( F = a M E • io Fi .0 a o E "� ' } • O n c I U O I U �, ,t ,_ IVa L W 411 Date Application Received: 05/12/2022 Date Application Considered as Complete:05/28/2022Oho 60-Day Review Period Expires: 07/28/2022 To: Chair McCutcheon and Planning Commission Members ,�' Adam Edwards, City Administrator y � 4kES H Ott From: Melanie Curtis, Planner 111GG Date: 21 June 2022 Subject: #LA22-000026,Al Azad, 165 Bederwood Dr, Variances Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting front yard and side yard setback variances in order to construct an addition to the existing home. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background In 2021 the applicant received variances in order to redevelop the property. However, due to high material and labor costs,they have adjusted their plans. The applicant is now requesting III approvals in order to construct an attached garage addition on to the existing home.The rear porch addition will meet the required setbacks,the proposed garage addition will require front yard and side yard setback variances. The subject property(represented by the thick black line on survey) extends into/overlaps with a described railroad right-of-way easement (dashed line highlighted yellow on survey)see Exhibit C and the image on the right. The proposed addition, shown in blue, encroaches into this railroad easement area by 3.1 feet, creating �,..... a setback of 4.4 feet from the northern property tisss343• t-- --— ----\ r line. 4- vsbSide r •'- s r S r Grovel Driveway Practical Difficulties Analysis r ` I yes '; Applicant Submittal Information:The applicant I by-i 10.2 l-- has provided supporting documentation H 'ap. Added , I I ✓ regarding Practical Difficulties attached as I / i �-ar l Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional flo j I � �80 ltestim n regarding the application. / I RICantieve- , xis n � sed • .- Z. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Staff I1 %� iAddn. 1 L--- finds the LR-1A zoning district requirements, lot I I '2.' I t--X01-H 10 , - size,width, and the unique configuration "In Proposed n m1 without actual road frontage abutting the Luce 623,,_ _ _____1_-__..2_,_I —J I R, Line Trail create some practical difficulties for a r Front ,o, development.The existing detached garage is £ I zr, • r constructed right up to the property line within I - �8ui/d ng Setback- I— 50.0 150— FILE#LA22-000026 21 June 2022 Page 2 of 5 the railroad easement;the new garage addition is within this footprint.Typically we do not • allow building improvements within easements. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-305—Setbacks: LR-1A District Required Existing Proposed-House Front (East) House 50' House 40.1' House 10.1' Detached Garage 50' Detached Garage 8.3' Rear(West) 50' House 61.8' No change House 14.9'from the North Side 10' * property line; 7.3' -3.1' into the RR easement from the ROW** 4.4'from the property line** Garage 0' South Side 10' * House 45' 43.4' Garage 72' *Exception for side yard setback per 78-305(b)(1) **The property line for the purpose of setback measurement is shown extending 7.5 feet into the property based on the existence of the railroad ROW.See highlighted yellow dashed line on the annotated survey attached as Exhibit C. Section 78-305—Lot Area/Width: LR-1A District Lot Area Lot Width • Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200' Actual 17,054 s.f. (0.39 acre) 87.75' Section 78-1403—Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 17,054 s.f. (0.39 acre) Allowed: 3,410 s.f. (20%) Proposed: 2,322 s.f. (13.6%) Section 78-1700—Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Tier Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier 2 17,054 s.f. 5,116 s.f. 2,003 s.f. 2,534 s.f. (30%) (11.7%) (14.8%) Applicable Regulations: Front+ Rear Setback Variances (Section 78-305) The applicant is requesting variances from the front 50-foot setback and side setback in order to construct a garage addition in line with the exiting home's interior layout.The side property line abuts the Luce Line ROW which extends into the property 7.5 feet.The existing home is set 7.3 feet from the ROW line, 14.9'from the property line on The north side yard facing the Luce Line FILE#LA22-000026 21 June 2022 Page 3 of 5 Trail functions as a front for the existing home while the east lot line is the defined "front"for setback determination purposes. Governing Regulation:Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14,when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance.The setback variances area supported by practical difficulties due to the substandard lot • conditions and lot of record status.The requested variance for side setback for the garage addition do not appear to be in harmony with the City's goals for conforming development and is not in harmony with the Ordinance as the addition could be adjusted to meet the 10-foot setback from the easement line.The requested front setback variance may be reasonable considering the location of the existing home. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Based on the location of the existing home setback variances are needed to construct the attached garage addition to the home which is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls;The required setbacks for the Property allow for an approximate 3,200 square foot building area;the existing home footprint extends 10 feet outside of the buildable envelope. It is reasonable to connect the garage addition on the east side of the home to utilize the existing driveway easement would require variances. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The substandard size of the property, railroad right-of-way encroachment, orientation,and driveway easement access are existing conditions;there is no available land with which to make the Property conforming.The location of the driveway easement and existing home are likely driving the design and need for the setback variances; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The orientation and placement of the home on the property does not appear to negatively impact the local neighborhood character. FILE#LA22-000026 21 June 2022 Page 4 of 5 0 Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06,subd. 17,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable, as residential home is an allowed use in the LR-1A District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.There are special conditions to the land justifying the setback variances in the existing home location, easement access and driveway configuration.This criteria is met. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The LR-1A setbacks are not specific to the Property yet a number of other small lots exists within this area.The setbacks cause the need for the requested setback variances. This criteria is met. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Substantial property right is provided by the • home on the property.The proposed variances to the side and front yard setbacks to orient the garage in a particular way is not a right.This criteria is not met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the setback variances in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.The Applicant asserts that the setback variances are necessary.The setback variances provide for a garage orientation and footprint location which make use of the home and driveway orientation. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter 4111 FILE#LA22-000026 21 June 2022 Page 5 of 5 • the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the variances as requested.The applicant should use care in improving the existing driveway to connect to the new driveway to assure the improved area remains within the easement. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing& Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Aerial Photos Exhibit G. Property Owners List Exhibit H. Plat Map 1111 • 5/24/22,1:09 PM Permit Details I Citizenserve PC Exhibit A Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 05/12/2022 41111 Address: 165 Bederwood DR Orono, MN 55356 Parcel Number: 0511723120011 Land Use Number: LA22-000026 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: AL AZAD Address: 402 LEWIS AVE S PO BOX 402 Applicant: Name: Al Azad Company: Address: 200 Bederwood Dr. Orono,Mn 55356 a.azad59@outlook.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Al Azad a.azad59@outlook.com Associated Contact: Al Azad a.azad59@outlook.com Associated Contact: Al Azad i a.azad59@outlook.com Associated Contact: Al Azad a.azad59@outlook.com Project Description: variance Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: • https://www7.citizenserve.com/Admin/PemiitController 1/1 5/24/22, 1:11 PM Permit List I Citizenserve PC Exhibit B PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA22-000026 • 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: Yes 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: Yes 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: Not at all 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: The variance will not cause any difficulty to any one. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116106, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this 11, Chapter. Response: Will not cause any difficulty to access or blocking sun light. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: Single family dewelling 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: N/A 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. • Response: N/A 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a https://www7.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=85460258&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true 1/2 5/24/22, 1:11 PM Permit List I Citizenserve substantial property right of the applicant. Response: The garage will be in the same location as before. • 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: Not at all - N/A 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: N/A • • https://www7.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=ListPermits&Workorder_ID=85460258&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true 2/2 • PC Exhibit C „.....-NIN cors_f Gave Lot 3 r' Sec 13 asynep^6amt,R moo Site Plan dome •O Lea u ound bn .� a.evarea for. ®basting weir A/Azod 4bM9 Ce.bar QJ M4nr vas 14.630 �n tJ1ne,rev. Eat., deo..,.R b Rriogrl Nerd.°et 11 R, analo `dra"deatc° .0 uv .cm"n 34° . 1e5,Edge of ROW 60 ,' Chlmneyr •Ok 69. 1 neck 1 0 \ \ - •71. 00 Nn'051,7]3,200,, F'.3 9 1 Y fi r 4.0, Subtotal a Less Ret.PP. Subtotal.. 2580 - d'b za"a3 w roteb .f51'4I \ R(ked) t of Area 1705. parcel,1..e 12054 I \ 1"'Sr Percent N a°> 1.7X percent Hardcover 14.66 \ R'.... ti- \ 5,o y- \ via. 7,S .draw°Deverme 7 roe S+Mee6, Lt • r- 8 \ t °Leta e.a bs swdm,raa amber 203.Nen..cele.., \< \\ ,r?''l r N Commencingaant o25,he et tins Government°t x Section�. I I \'`�^. -- :- b �tM,y at oagle of 6ne Northwest' of IS• H 305.54 \\ 9 1 U �6.-.4:',....., feel.a,a.Pest ."e�k4 ef,decee pant a a p'.:v°�irmirep"ar;- dwv'ok errs -�"d''' �. °2ny �\.` descant ft 65 s 5"bwutelu3,�m is i edrew.o`thence wmw. `' aline t° throughto ars .South,at _ I .A '1 ': ', °� "` 'beginning P rel ,m..thl rc,ttrod`, Pro,reservations e,reea,e 1 I Rear ".t""t`_,r���� I� "' L "�. if ter Ii \'3^' '"o onEOP.0.6t,R;ohtter-6b.for °r (ase Na 7178«u •I 673- __L_ '-.�-�-r \ "6,..,".e'w: yz�t,l_ Marty t of Lot 37 of Pueblo:s°bebw ,umber HA according M II I o. r • a, and I..eoed^the Nva a van ed as x IS R.Sp..sdkn al I n; \q°nb' w'.e\\ 11 rota, Commencing of o goal rm4.r,Net a,M e5,tne northwest corner of ;, m \\ 1 Government Lot z of Sect.5 rows/.117 rally Rove 13 Wes, hence s' QI.35L --"}.. JI f \ ( With.tu Net the. AYM1b m^u N,00 seconds[w; Y Front 2 3 11 \ 1 nning thencexo}feeu 61"5s am u mn'a, u.cam,et to�s itox,int°thence de fest tone feet thence 1 \1 wt 1112 Mt n 3 de4.wa 33 on.... ' it ta.wn�Eaef 2671 Mt:ih.nw seutn 61 ,15,mbute,C6,.cone ,,—}E9ea9 s.M« F sou to t° ode. t"„n'"",:::�h::.°,1 ';'1 m�`e Y, nxib ed T0,1 E j/ 1 m \ e n«b of u.center Pr leer cderwr grees 09 mamsed m cminutes 17 onds 305s L- 7 y 1 �' " 1a and 5,r°�,M Southerly said centerfee,d ce North ---y -�- 1 o 1 9mho'.:'59 02 minutes wet seconds feet thence e.. 1�. o 6 P..0.6, 11 p' 11 07 seconds West 1049 tear to t feet tt of eea^n:p con/a`3 o 0.06 acne 1m^H�y- East 11251 1`--5,/1 x Lp. 11 I 11 d.Not r.as f comp c parallel thence North 05 m3ules 1.1 I' of � ° C°• 11 I 11 Me eb deed cawbtbn for Me.abed property(I...5536466,ate e \?\ aBea r r 16,eNo)ter, t.6eb. Ape16776kto�tM^.w1eo.a7a.e 3 • Subsequent dent eseoabtao,Mg he current ewe..deed...IN.n of canoeing the current Pert order to 3clud•the historic..tance of t Ike �' FY, II (Doe .e AON r. 5,r)cd t°distance of 5775 M1 orney lc • \ A9643539.63. 75 feet along 00,5,d0 0.0•4 mowe°e purposes o' I \\\ ,"/L a f Mk ,neuro be completed wkly r o,.m.nt ,ore.corrective w e.w. \ a,y /�!7- a \= I g \\ J` BearingsBearingsbased w assumed datum.. \ Ir \ e.r1Z.:=7:1-11%;:"" '^"^�^w` 4210 ''-'1/1`. W SCHOBORG w °t I en e a R Land a 6 mag. LL \•)41� LA D SERVICES ""°`M.State°"Mend..'° ,ode 2/4/11 9 INC. '5,2. A5bf4 -, Maw by ops 'h'L.gnaw R.akno 4/7471/(p.op.. b0.3 boa..) 789-972-J221 5557 0.‘05.716 u00'55326 Nov 5.2012 Rrobtrotion Na 4632 p 49 0320) �.Stlrl5W�mn Gate. d 5/05/22(rop.95,59, • • PC Exhibit D aii \ WRINE TF INMALT 12 RODE PITCH W T2 ——i 1vB CEDAR FASCIA Qyp1 is /� 3.5/12 PITCH VWLT THIS ROOF AREA 6 �\ W/1.z TRW BOARD YFY�3�(� 1a6 CEDAR FASCIA /� OPT.TO MWVY.FASCIA) light (VIZI' BOARD A-- OP MATCH EASCIA PIP •_6, p›.-- \0 SOFFIT SYS. 0 Wx1y6 OPT.ALUM.FASCIA �0`MC • 1a % AND SOFFIT SYS. � � gyj�i777a�g; DYHc I IIII -.44 ° ° 1 % WEET-s. .1111= LP.SMART-SIDE NORM £�% i LP.SMART-HOE NORIZ. •I LAP SIDING(EXPOSURE 0 a LAP SIDING(EXPOSURE TO MATCH CORNER TO MATCH EXISTING) Y IIN 6"SYART-S1DE SIDE CORNER n VI 6"SMART-SIDE CORN, MINNIMMI BOARDS �� BOARDS V w8 REAR ELEVATION i`ig � OUTLINE OF EXISTING HOUSE ROOF SYSTEM e N g3 NEW 4/12 PITCH ROOF OVER NEW ENTRY SCALE:1/4",-0" SHINGLES TO MATCH EOSTNC (THIS ROOF RISES ABOVE EXISTING ROOF UNE-SADDLE ROOF OUT HERE AS REDO SHINGLES TO MATCH E%ISTNG [1 a6 CEDAR FASCIA W/1a2 TRIM BOARD _ (TO MATCH E%ISTG) - '-6" OPT.ALUM.FASCIA 2,6 ND SOFFIT SYS. IT O G IaB CEDAR FASCIA 0 7-im=1 1111 WM1 TRIM BOARD -1 -- -4 �_ Nw o (TO MATO EROSTG) N �� a- y N OPT.ALUM.FASCIA —I _0 �� § AND SOFFIT SVS. =_ -IIMIL� w11=11111=11111.I IIIIIIIIIIM 9N w Q a_— _=SEW i —IMIlLe ��MIM IIII MEM 1111111111111111 A"'w a' �t rc 2.9 TREATED LEDGER L.P.SMART-SIDE H0162. n . '�'R. aoBOARD FOR FUT.WOODLAP 401NG(En041REJ�� b aSTEPS(O PATIO DN TO MATCIR EXISTING) LEFT SIDE GAR. ELEV. ` �F; GRADE(RASH AS REO'O) 6"SMART-SIDE CORNER BOARDS I SCALE:1/1".10-0•, RETAINING WALL AS NEEDEDISA CO O^D 6��\ 0 m �6 SHINGLES TO MATCH SADDLE THIS ROOF OUT Qv I.CEDAR FASCIA EXISTING AS REWIRED VI/114 TRIM BOARD (TO MATCH EXIST'G) 1._6.. NEW A/12 PITGI ROOF OVER NEW ENTRY RIGHT SIDE REAR ADDT'N AOPT.ALUM.ND SOFFIT FASCIA /.. \OYHG (MIS ROOF RISES ABOVE EXISTING ROOF Z ll HOUSE ROOF UNE) I .4. ==1•11111— MEM= �MEMM ____ ____ — — ,I.-6.. ■�� -—7 c HR — === .4 == =MEM ==1• _ an _ - - LP. —SIDE H - SMART- OIHZ. EH MU IIIIIIII IIIIIIII HUH IIIIIIII UM HMO —_ TOP STING(EXPOSURE = EHMilHEHEUMEHEHMR = - ct ct%t. 10 MATCH EXISTING) 6•SMART-SIDE CORNER—��IIIIIIII UMIIIIIIII OMUM Ell IN HUH ° BOAR°B l\\\\I e--` / \ FRONT ELEVATION I SCALE 1/4,1•-V6 K r • �n • • / €el;ia ! gypp ii2iL�R RE OUTSIDE OF Ll FTA WALL FRAMING IS d°Ifeef Sl FRAMED 2.OUT BEYOND FOUNDATION 191. PERIMETER OFWALL TO F HOUSE FOUNDATION W FOR 2"RIGID INSE AT Ie(7<yX 22•-A•. a A€pe9 e NOTE: a Hi114y�q 2" 2" s gig TOP OF NEW CRAWL SPACE POURED FOUNDATION IS r 1 SET SO THAT TOP OF NEW 3/4'TIS PLY.SUB-FLOOR 1' \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ `�U Pp.Q ON TOP OF 9-1/2"I-JOIST THAT IS SET ON TREATED \r 1 I 'n�e4Y6 SILL PLATES IS EVEN W/TOP OF EXISTING HOUSE MAIN • FLOOR SUB-FLOOR 8"POURED WALL \ r \ 2018 CONC FTG ., \ - n n \ (BELOW FROST) / h \ VO r r O \ NEW CRAWL 5,8 SPACLY.EMOR /y'\` L H j ' BARRIER UNDER ENTRE SLAB .-- .I. / i G s \ L AREA B POURED WALL \ g N F r D - \ Io (BELOW CONC \ co,), $ 22'-0' ' ' REMOVESTSDOSING CANTED BOOR \ A, r� , a. REOV FOR T1WG CD TD LOE 1 / / ! / / / / / / / CHASE d 1 m 41 2.. [1 1 '' . , - - - - .�„7/1/j i'-” 7L///7/////'/7 / 806 CURB /� b O 2 LOCATE CRAW SPACE ^ 8'POURED WALL ACCESS TO SUIT 2006 CONC FTC / (BELOW FROST) 1 a EXISTING BASMENT • / , W3nb$b /\ ilo ..c NEW UNEXCAVATED / Pt3S< < Q / CONC SLAB SLOPED TO > .m o; . > DNID DRB FCR DRAINAGE / < / 618 CURB ° / ��kow=j FOUNDATION PLAN n / 8MPFCONC FW G S 4,e1,O , J I SCALE:1/R"-I'-O" Z"` (BELOW FROST) / ''W,§g g M GD a �/ ami=' / jo o¢ R K NOTES: C GARAGE SLAB IS POURED 1211--4 / N / Ll (-0 TOP OF SLAB LEDGES AND OF _� i w ALL FOOTINGS TO BE BELOW FROST GARAGE SLAB DORYS APPROX. O LOWER AND CONTINUOUS Hal 1 I N DIM TOP OF NEW DORY CONC SLAB _ //L LL_I / / / '__ _� 1 ANCHOR BOLTS«STRAPS SPACED f z\-/---- , , — PER MANE SPECIRCATIONS Q v Cn /��I' 61G CURB CONC.FOUNDATION 15 INSET 2"AT PERIMETER 'a 12 B'POURED WALL - I / NEW UNE). NI? B"POURED WALL OF HOUSE FOUNOATON TO ALLOW FOR 2"EXT. I 5 2006 CONE FTC r 2018 CONC FTC RIGID INSL.FROM TOP OF FOOTNG TO UNDER y E2 (BELOW FRBST) �,II (BELOW FROST) BIDE OF SILL PLATES(NEW CRAWL SPACE ONLY) Z C 4j / , URETHANE SPRAY FOAM INSL AT INTERIOR L bLT/L/ SIDE OF ALL RIM AREAS(R-20 MINIMUM) +9 (-71.."------ CURB OPNG f i-F7 I F , b 218 TREATED SILL PLATES AT NEW POURED m CONC FOUNDATON WALLS THAT ARE MSEC 2" U 18'-3'• AT NEW CRAWL SPACE NEW E INTO DRAIN TLE AT NEW DRAWL SPACE TMMM11 TE INTO EBBING S STEMBASEMENT-RAIN TLI:O INSTALL NEW SUMP SYSTEM WITH-IN NEW CRAWL Y o I SPACE NOTE: •1 TOP OF NEW GARAGE/ENTRY FOUNDATION(818 POURED PERIMETER CURB IS TO BE EVEN W/TOP OF EXISTING HOUSE MAIN FLOOR CONC SLAB(SO NEW CONE ENTRY u =al, SLAB IS EVEN W/EXISTING HOUSE MAIN FLOOR SLAB) 1 iS 410 • �€3 APO1T + 1�Wl 9 _ 6•_ff' z'-T' S'-1D' _ 2•_T• 2•-tl"_ lqq 6 3020 PICT. i r 3020 PICT. ' (S.11 r� A , ;Hill & 0.- Le r a,3/0 ATRIUM DOOR gg (FULL-NEW) 0� GAS F1-PL C r 6•-2• SIA GAB FTPLACE iy H 2/6E. VAULTED TRUSSES i N\ 6 me <o 0 Og (3.5/12 INT.VAULT) L - m NEW NEW RAA4ILY ROOM d c L a BATH - t1'-0' ' v Arm VAULTED TRUSSES - ryV1 Y .14020 SHOWER, 24••O.L. 3 �� —] b I __ci (3.5/12 INT.VAULT) SET THIS WINDOW HEAD HEIGHT AT • ]6 B•'BELOW TOP CO WALL FRAMING a 2640-2 L I _•, 60 1 t (ALLOWS FOR 2-284 HEADER W/3-PLATES) i EXISTING OPENING It 1 2L 1-3/HE4 X 2-1/a U 88 2GARAGE WALL '-1 FRAMING(6 1/B••ROUGH ADER WALL FRMAING HEIGHT TO MATCH NEW ENTRY /}xREMOYE EXISTING WINDOWB WALL FRAMING HEIGHT) LAND F-PUCE(W/CRAY) M FRAME-IN OPENINGS AND INSTALL NEW WINDOW SHOW" EHOc 1111 ROOF TRUSSES (STARTING W NINDOWC OPENING) o 24"0.G. EXISTING HOUSE b 0 0 illIA N TA Q R NOTES: l.!V. O�: I$ NEW GARAGE L ALL INT.&EXT.BEARING OPENINGS SHALL T I 4••CONC SLAB SLOPED TO R FIRST FLOOR PLAN HAVE 2-2410 HEADERS UNLESS OTHERWY z a OYHO DRS FOR DRAINAGE • SPEOFIEO DR ON THE DRAWINGS VERIFY ALL SCALE: 1/4"..1•-O' HEADER CHANGES FROM THE LUMBER CO., TRUSS CO.AND/OR BUILDING OFFICIALS 2016 AWNING YT HEAD _M SHEETROCN H FlRETAPE GARAGE COMMON ALL LN.BEAMS ME TO BE VERIFIED PRIOR N. k WALL TO RIDGE(OPTION TO FULLY INSULATE. HEIGHT AT ABOVE NOS TO CONSTRUCTOR (� SHEETROGN H TM /(5J E ALL GARAGE WALLS 4'-D' M Le AND CEILING) '--'I FULL-LENGTH BENCH WITH I I W/FULL-LENGTH UPPER ..-_ --- DENOTES NEW WALL CONSTRUCTION w M1 WED a 710 MID DR me- -OPBIES THAT RUN OVEROS me, TOP OF WINDOW Q v I DENOTES EXISTING WALL CONSTRUCTION ROOF TRUSSES I 1 REMOVE EXISTING DOOR AND SIDELIGHT is A FRAME AS 3/0 CASED OPENING DENOTES EXISTING WALLS TO BE REMOVED 2{••D.C. I^ z/6 NEW I ENTRY A ,� 66 ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS ARE CO // BE FIEND VERIFIED:ALTER AS RE09 ) i n It. I 4_ 3/0 _ FRAME BOTH NEW ENTRY AND NEW FAMILY ROOM N Lt__ 2046 TEMPit, AT 6'-1 I/6•'R01GH CDUNG HEIGHT I D I WIf'NDOWS USTED ARE ANDERSEN SERIES 100 CASEMENT U '....•-2)1-5/4 8 11-2/B LvL BEAM TO RUN CONTINUOUS IFROM CORNER TO CORNER AT THISC OVERHEAD DOOR ` AND AWNING STYLE UNITS(MATCH SIZES IF AN ALTERNATE WALL BRAND IS USED) NOTE: X`' p _- 6._D• a. I• �•-0„ IT IS THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE WINDOW e--..r--1 SUPPUER TO VERIFY THAT ALL UNITS MEET EGRESS H TEMPERED REQUIREMENTS(ALTER UNITS AS REQUIRED);THE BUYERS,BUILDER AND SUPPUER ARE RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY SI A 5 THAT THE 1NND0WS SPECIFIED ARE THE UNITS TO BE ORDERED(ALTER AS REQUIRED) b' AID AUTUMN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY MIS-LABELED WINDOWS ON THESE PLANS "`' 11110 PC Exhibit E • Hardcover Calculations (from Survey) Site Address: Existing Hardcover (sq. ft.): Proposed Hardcover (sq. ft.): 165 Bederwood Dr. House 1,433 House 1,202 Orono, MN 55356 Cants 41 Prop. Addition 363 Chimneys 22 Cants 41 Deck 213 Chimneys 0 Garage 412 Deck 0 Driveway 32 Prop. Garage 716 PID No.: 0511723120011 Retaining Walls 46 Prop. Driveway 212 Subtotal = 2199 Retaining Walls 46 Less Ret. Walls & Subtotal = 2580 150 sq. ft. of deck —196 Less: Ret. Walls —46 Total = 2003 Total = 2 534 Parcel Area: 17,054 sq. ft. (total) Parcel Area 17,054 Parcel Area 17,054 Percent Hardcover 11.7% Percent Hardcover 14.8% • • • P:,-3..e., Exhibit F If `. "Y f'�, ,+ AP"''^^ ` ,,�,Y� "yM'.j � �4' 'y, 46.1 y itiriailka 71411k177. `1 r n .. r r 1/400.:2',1"' 7 ! ,tom: 4. 4h Subject Property �" 1 'er >' `I!` . `1- 11,9r"--,,„,. ..."Inv �4 ((', r• •``?., t' y'. .ii• i. . 1' ; ..S t+' i�4 j, i e}y.l ai"A v , ^i. !f . r ,ltd _ 1'wT w *�r 7 4 4i Yy 1 ►psid ,, i 'r �. . ,�r S' •....--•••44 Ake t •II—�«4+•`+ .' tee♦ �'�•a ` ' ...mss ..fig` rs. i Flo,' a c. : . "Sr, Yrs J°44.'"'aXY.1.t ,. 0 • � l " , i.,y. :' . ` 2r, ma . f / t .�,r �:s��"vim � :�" , wr :r • • tt t{ ..fi g ` '!.• Ilk 47 *;411%.# � .,r/ . •• coo �` ' b.• , •~: i, M� -24- f yy # �` qr I �- It ` .tib`*- - ,1,'.'' , t. ''t: a 222 ® . y • PC Exhibit G 38 05-117-23 12 0006 38 05-117-23 12 0022 38 05-117-23 21 0017 DNR REAL ESTATE MGMT CLEMENT C KROLL DNR REAL ESTATE MGMT ATTN DEBBIE GURTIN 60 STUBBS BAY RD S ATTN DEBBIE GURTIN • 500 LAFAYETTE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 500 LAFAYETTE RD ST PAUL MN 55155 ST PAUL MN 55155 38 05-117-23 12 0010 38 05-117-23 12 0024 38 05-117-23 21 0018 TRUSTEE BETZ ADDITION HOMEOWNRS ASSO CITY OF ORONO 3580 BAYSIDE RD 60 STUBBS BAY RD S PO BOX 66 LONG LAKE MN 55356 MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 05-117-23 12 0011 38 05-117-23 12 0028 38 05-117-23 21 0025 ALISHAH S AZAD CHRISTOPHER J ADAMS JACOB J BARKLEY 165 BEDERWOOD DR ELLEN A ADAMS MAUREEN L BARKLEY LONG LAKE MN 55356 200 BEDERWOOD DR 3640 BAYSIDE RD ORONO MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 12 0012 38 05-117-23 13 0017 38 05-117-23 24 0117 ELLIOT L DIETZ RICHARD&KATHLEEN A KYLE CITY OF ORONO 185 BEDERWOOD DR 1140 TONKAWA RD P O BOX 66 ORONO MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 05-117-23 12 0016 38 05-117-23 13 0041 DNR REAL ESTATE MGMT JO ANNE POOLE BARTLETT ATTN DEBBIE GURTIN 3568 BAYSIDE ROAD 500 LAFAYETTE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 ST PAUL MN 55155 • 38 05-117-23 12 0017 38 05-117-23 13 0048 US BANK TRUST SKR TRUSTEE CIO HUDSON HOMES MGMT LLC 3580 BAYSIDE RD 3701 REGENT BLVD STE 200 ORONO MN 55356 IRVING TX 75063 38 05-117-23 12 0018 38 05-117-23 13 0055 WILLIAM C HAASE JR ALISHAH S AZAD 3575 CHRISTINE DR 402 LEWIS AVE S ORONO MN 55359 PO BOX 212 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 12 0019 38 05-117-23 13 0056 NICOLE M NELSON JEFFREY D&RENEE J MUELLER 3535 CHRISTINE DR 222 BEDERWOOD DR MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 12 0020 38 05-117-23 21 0001 SUSAN L MANIKOWSKI CITY OF ORONO 3505 CHRISTINE DR CITY CLERK MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 05-117-23 12 0021 38 05-117-23 21 0014 • ADAM R BELL&JESSICA L BELL JAMES B&VICTORIA M SEALS 3485 CHRISTINE DR 3620 EILEEN ST MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 PC Exhibit H Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map 4 , • ; i Date: 5/13/2022 Bederwn. Park. i. tar: �� 1CC I 18r 1 a Iltr 357:3i ,...= o9. r9: 3545 34F r MIGO 3620 0 nor -11111111 .1 , , :IOV311v$t. _ L • 165 oi, a£2' • 3640 • rtbl 3580 Mt 200 ot • om -911111 �� 210 222 1111111111110111) 356K ,..11 MI A 1111111 3560 rFj' 3500 3A j, Pk1 r• t9 _ r Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: IIIIIIIII 165 Bederwood This data O is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (i)is furnished with no warranty of any knd, and (ii) is notsuitable for legal, engneering or surveying • purposes.Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from the data. For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55487/gis.i nfo@h en ne pi n.us • Date Application Received: May 18,2022 A, Date Application Considered as Complete:June 7,2022 =VO 60-Day Review Period Expires: August 6,2022 To: Chair McCutcheon and Planning Commission Members yet L� Adam Edwards, City Administrator �kFSHo�� From: Laura Oakden, Interim Community Development Director Date: 21 June 2022 Subject: LA22-000028, Eskuche Design, 2605 North Shore Drive,Variances, Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting the following variances: • Hardcover in the 75' lakeyard • Buildings in the 75' lakeyard • Retaining walls in the 75' lakeyard • Side yard setback • Lot area • Wetland setback for the proposed entrance monuments. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the proposed • hardcover, building, retaining walls in the 75'lakeyard,side yard setback and lot area variances. Staff does not support the wetland setback for the proposed entrance monuments. Background This is a unique property in that an inlet from Lake Minnetonka encroaches into the lot, establishing an additional 75 lake yard into the side of the property. The applicant is proposing to build a new home, replacing the existing structure. The existing home sits forward of the 75' lakeyard setback, about 18 feet from the Lake Minnetonka and 50 feet from the inlet. The applicant proposes the new home further back away from the lakeshore, 36.5 feet from the Lake, and 53 feet from the inlet. The proposal includes the removal of hardcover on the west and south sides of the property. To minimize the inlet encroachment,the applicant proposes to move the home closer to the east side property line, into the east side yard setback. The applicant has worked to design the home to try and improve the current setbacks and maintain some of the same footprint of the existing home. The proposal includes new expansions with the house and hardcover within the 75' lake yard. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)was contacted regarding the proposed house floor elevations. The proposed survey notes a low opening at the storage and lower garage at 925.5. MCWD noted they require the lowest opening of the house must be 933.5. This information was shared with the applicant. MCWD will complete a review at time of permitting. The application depicts a new location for entrance monuments. The property currently has entrance monuments that can be maintained. New entrance monuments in new a location would require them to come into conformance with the city code. The applicant is suggesting a • 5 foot setback from the edge of the wetland where 25' is required. LA22-000028 June 21 2022 Page 2 of 7 A variance application was approved for a new home in 2019 (LA19-000049). That application has expired. The new home is asking for similar variances. The 2019 home was approved for a 19' side yard setback,today's application is proposing a 21'side yard setback. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicants Submittal information:The applicant has identified the unique existing lakeshore and inlet lake yard as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance. Additionally,they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty,Staff finds the inlet is a practical difficulty supporting variances, and notes the applicant is working to improve the site by working within the existing building footprint and massing of the proposed home. The new home is further from the lakeshore compared to the existing home. The applicant is also reducing the overall hardcover of the property. Due to the location of the existing home in the lakeyard,grading will need to be done to remove the existing home and restore the lawn and for the new proposed Staff finds the wetland buffer setback variance a convenience and not necessary for the use of the property. Staff does not support the wetland buffer setback variance request for new entrance monuments. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-305 - Building Setbacks: DISTRICT LR-1A Required Existing Proposed Street 50' Roughly 290' Roughly 240' Side (west) 30' 91' 95' Side (east) 30' 24' 21' Lakeshore (main) 75' 18' 36.5' Lakeshore (inlet) 75' Roughly 50' Roughly 53' The building will meet the ALS. The proposed walls are shown Average Lakeshore to be within the 42" height allowance from the existing grade. This setback is met. Section 78-1605—Wetland Setback/ Entrance Monuments DISTRICT LR-1A Required Existing Proposed Wetland Setback 25' 6' 5' (New location) • The applicant is able to maintain what they have, but the new proposed entrance monuments are considered new encroachments within this setback. Section 78-305- Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2 acres) 200' Actual 81,213 s.f. (1.86 acre) 230' @ OHWL • LA22-000028 June 21 2022 Page 3 of 7 • Section 78-1403-Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 81,213 s.f. (1.86 acre) Allowed: 16,242.6 s.f. (20%) Existing: 3,868 s.f. (4%) Proposed: 5,696 s.f. (7%) Section 78-1680-Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area Allowed Overlay District in Zone Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier Tier 1 81,213 s.f 20,303 s.f. 17,353 s.f. 14,061 s.f. (25%) (21.37%) (16.79%) Applicable Regulations: Lot Area and Side Setback Variance (78-305 &78-72) The zoning district requires a lot to be 2 acre and have a 30' side yard setback. The property is 1.86 acres in size,substandard to the zoning district. The property is unique due to the inlet of Lake Minnetonka and substandard size creating a limited building envelope. Zoning Code Section 78-72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard • properties within the Shoreland Overlay District, like the subject lot, are able to be redeveloped without variances if specific standards are met;such as: 1. All setback requirements can be met; Not Met 2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules,chapter 7080, can be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer; and 3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 25 percent of the entire lot area. Met 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. Met The applicants request for additional variances results in the property's inability to conform to all of the standards above. Therefore, lot area variances are required in order to redevelop the property. The ability to develop the property consistent with other existing developed properties in the neighborhood would be limited if the area and width variances are not granted. Buildings and retaining walls in the 75' Lakeshore(78-1279) No building or retaining walls are permitting within the 75' lakeshore setback. The existing home sits almost entirely within the 75'lake yard setback. The new home will take advantage of the existing homes footprint and massing. The retaining walls will establish some usable lawn space along the side of the home. Retaining walls are also shown within the 75' lakeshore along the front/lakeside of the home. Some of the walls will sit in the same footprint and the existing deck. Some of the wall are proposed to support the driveway and some proposed walls will be used to create the patio/terrace area. LA22-000028 June 21 2022 Page 4 of 7 The new home is proposed to meet average lakeshore setback but the building will encroach into S the 75'setback along the eastern and western edge of the home due to the property being almost entirely surrounded by lakeshore. Roughly 880 sq.ft. of the 5349 sq.ft new home is located outside of the existing massing and is a new encroachment in the 75'setback. Hardcover in the 75' Lakeshore (78-1680) The property allowed 25%total hardcover. No hardcover is permitted within the 75' lakeshore setbacks. The exiting home covers over 21%of the lot in hardcover the new proposed home will decrease the overall hardcover to 16.79%. The meeting the overall hardcover requirements. Within the 75' lake yard setback;the new home is proposing a new deck/terrace which takes advantage of the existing patio footprint. The application will be removing the large existing driveway and reconfigure the access to the house. The new driveway will take advantage of the existing location but will reduce the overall driveway size. The new hardcover and building encroachments are considered new hardcover within the lakeshore setback. Wetland Buffer Setback(78-1605) Where the MCWD does not require a buffer, a 25 foot setback shall be required between the edge of all wetlands from any building(principal or accessory) or other structure,septic systems, or wells.The wetland edge shall be determined as required in section 78-1604 of this Code. The applicant did not submit a wetland delineation or any findings that a buffer was established through MCWD. The 25 foot setback buffer is a required setback for the site. The current • entrance monuments are nonconforming at roughly 6'from the edge of wetland. These improvements can be maintained but not expanded in any way. The applicant is proposing new monuments in a different location roughly 5'from the edge of wetland. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2,when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: • LA22-000028 June 21 2022 Page 5 of 7 • 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed variances are in harmony with the intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The goal of the ordinance is to reduce or eliminate improvements in the lake yard, the proposal shifts away from the lake yard as much as practical. The new entrance monuments are not in harmony with the ordinance to prevent improvements within the wetland buffer. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variances to develop a nonconforming lot of record are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of the home on the substandard lot,in the proposed location within the lake,and side yard setbacks, appears to be reasonable as the property's reduced size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore. The hardcover and retaining walls proposed within the lake yard appear to be reasonable. The entrance monuments are permitted by the city code but the proposed location is not reasonable within the wetland buffer. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The lake and its inlet limit the building envelope for the property. The surrounding lakeshore is unique property feature of the lane and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances are requested in order to permit construction of a home designed to fit the character of the neighborhood according to the submitted information. • Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat. §216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable,as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the LR-1A District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property's substandard size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore creates difficulties which may also apply to properties in the same neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The property's substandard size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore creates difficulties which may also apply to properties in the same neighborhood. However,the location of the lake surrounding the building envelope is very unique to this property. 0 LA22-000028 June 21 2022 Page 6 of 7 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.Granting a lot area,side yard and lake setback variances are necessary for the preservation of the property right of the application. The retaining walls and hardcover in the lakeyard variances facilitate the use of the property for the new home and are necessary for the preservation of the property.The wetland buffer setback variance for the new entrance monuments are not necessary for the enjoyment and use of the property. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.The variances do not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant. The variances are necessary as the property has considerable practical difficulties affecting development. The wetland buffer setback for entrance monuments are accessory structures to the principle building and granting this variance is a convenience and not necessary for the use of the property. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. A review of the new home will be completed when a building permit is submitted. Public Comments The applicant submitted two neighbor signatures for the project. It is included as Exhibit G. Issues for Consideration 1. Are the new entrance monuments necessary for the use of the lot? 2. Are the 75' lakeyard improvements reasonable for the site? 3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the proposed variances for hardcover, building, and retaining walls in the 75' lakeyard,side yard setback and lot area for construction of a new house. Staff recommends denial of the proposed wetland setback for the new entrance monuments as the practical difficulty standards are not met. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application and Narrative Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Survey and Site Plans Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. 2019 PC memo and Approved Resolution LA22-000028 June 21 2022 Page 7 of 7 • Exhibit G. Neighbor's Comments Exhibit H. Property Owners List and Map • • Letter View PC Exhibit A Land Use Application Summary LA22-000028 Application Date: 05/18/2022 Address: 2605 North Shore DR Orono, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 0911723420002 Land Use Number: LA22-000028 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: DANIEL JOSEPH MARTINSON Address: HEIDI MARIE MARTINSON 18151 TERRITORIAL RD Applicant: Name: Peter Eskuche Company: Eskuche Design Address: 18318 Mlnnetonka Blvd Deephaven,MN 55391 peter@eskuche.us Contact Information: Associated Contact: Peter Eskuche peter@eskuche.us Associated Contact: Associated Contact: 411 Associated Contact: Project Description: New Home Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application 0 Conditional Use Permit 0 Site Plan Application 0 Subdivision Application 0 Subdivision Exception 0 Vacation Application 0 Variance Application ID Applicant Signature: • file:///ci.orono.mn.us/...22-000028%20(2605%20North%20Shore%20Dr)%20VAR/Land%20Use%20Application%20Summary%20(19).htm[6/16/2022 1:38:23 PM] • Re: 2605 North Shore Drive, Orono, MN Eskuche Design Group Peter Eskuche,AIA 7 June 2022 Variance Application Version 2.0 Honorable Plan Commission, City Council Members and City Planner, We appreciate your consideration for the variance request to permit a replacement home at 2605 North Shore Drive. We have worked diligently with our Client and have met with the City Staff to develop this proposal to achieve its highest and best use balancing the client's needs,a cohesive architectural layout,and the city's planning guidelines. We received and listened to the feedback from the city and as a result have made modifications to the drawings to address their concerns. We received approval in October of 2019 for a larger home that has since been reduced in size with less lakeshore encroachment and well within the hardcover allowed. The lakeside setbacks are the primary practical difficulty.We have provided a site plan showing the conforming building area which illustrates clearly how the unusual,irregular • and undersized triangular shape would not provide an adequate family home.The main reason is that French Creek flows through half of the property creating an additional shoreline from which to set the house back. The existing property has a very small amount grass area in which to recreate.The creek divides the property making all the upland area nearly inaccessible and what area is left is needed for vehicles to access the home. The existing home is almost completely within the lakeshore setback,being less than 28' from the lake at the closest point and only 88'at the furthest point.The current home's floorplan is obsolete with room arrangements and a layout that no longer meets the needs of today's homeowner. Despite painting and replacing some windows,the existing home is a negative detriment on the context of the neighborhood and the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka. This current proposal reduces the proposed lakeside encroachment from 27'-10"to 47' at the closest point of the home's structure.The proposed deck face is 211/2 feet further from lake than existing and the proposed primary house face is set back 28'/2 feet further from lake than existing. If the average lakeshore setback was considered,the proposed home would be conforming because of the setback of the adjacent homes. We previously received a unanimous Variance approval for a more non-conforming lakeshore setback than we are currently requesting. Our current deck doesn't encroach into Average Lakeshore Setback while the previously approved raised patio encroached approx. 9'-10". Our proposal reduces the massing of the property.The previously approved residence had a second floor,however this proposal is a walk-out rambler without a second floor.We have provided before and after visuals to show that the proposed structure steps back away from the lakeshore,reducing the height and proximity to the lake. Our proposal reduces the proposed hardcover by 3,719 square feet below the existing residence and is below 25%making it conforming. Our proposal reduces total lakeshore hardcover by over 32%. Not including the lakeshore gravel covering,the existing Lake Minnetonka lakeshore includes almost 6,400 s.f.of hardcover within the lakeshore setback. Our proposal reduces Minnetonka lakeshore hardcover by 38%to about 3,950 s.f. and returns all of the gravel landscape cover to natural grass and plantings. It is unknown whether the existing gravel landscaping has plastic underneath,however it is currently an eyesore and very unnatural. Including the French Creek lakeshore in calculations,we reduce hardcover from almost 13,600 s.f. down to about 9,200 s.f. We appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing this application for the proposed replacement structure. Peter Eskuche 4110 Eskuche Design Group 612-296-7575 I Letter View PC Exhibit B LA22-000028 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA22-000028 . The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The proposed home & landscaping is reasonable use of this property. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The property has two lakeshore setbacks - Lake Minnetonka & French Lake/Creek. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The proposed plan will increase the conformity of the lot. The existing home and landscaping encroach further into the Lake Minnetonka and French Lake/Creek setbacks. The proposed plan reduces the amount of hardcover on the lot. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: n/a 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1163.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. lesponse: Practical difficulties include restrictive allowable buildable area for this unique lot. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: n/a 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: n/a 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: In addition to the typical Lake Minnetonka shoreline, there is a unique secondary shoreline setback due to French Lake/Creek. It restricts the conforming buildable area by severely constricting the 1.86 acre rectangular lot to a 0.13 acre wedge-shaped conforming area. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. esponse: The typical Lake Minnetonka lot does not have a secondary shoreline setback. 0. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. file:///ci.orono.mn.us/...8%20(2605%20North%20Shore%20Dr)%20VAR/Practical%20Difficulties%20Documentation%20Form%20(16).htm[6/16/2022 1:38:24 PM] Letter View Response: correct 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. • Response: n/a 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: correct • • file:///ci.orono.mn.us/...8%20(2605%20North%20Shore%20Dr)%20VAR/Practical%20Difficulties%20Documentation%20Form%20(16).htm[6/16/2022 1:38:24 PM] PC Exhibit D LA22-000028 qAV� . - N 68.51.OD"W 2660.61 W - CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR 8l <r JOHN & SANDRA JEROME • gm sr /14.....,...........,..., \\ IN GOVT LOT 4, SEC. 9-117-23 \\ HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA �J• ^, e °JB+aVI // \\�AI� 'wN', , _ Lra;s As / \ S1pWN aN oYo.M0.1467 / '\ \ /- sa00• T \ i \ ,t.0S,3p, "� \\ s AJ", \\ ���� \ . n \ , \\ / \\ 'Ivy ¢s� ias.,., / / vv ,, \ , N• / // \\ a�w°°ex� \ // \ CO . \ U V' TN / \X \,\\ �- �,- �, %• \NN\t\\ 'tea;, ;% ;i AUT \ \\ h / \ \ COSMO I / vv Nv �v ,/ 4 \ ,\. \ ,. q, / / \\N \\ / a..J \ \N, \ 3 /'/7. NN),...„,, \\ ii yin, / • /// if y/ --- -\� --moi+N N p\ /_-//ii in / if q, \\��i,l �` ;, / BLACKTOP p DRIVEWAY \`4, ,�%. 0 4, d��JJ1 l i/ I y q _ . � ., / SCALE N Ft, �( L\ 4. � 'ri ' EXISTING /,` ,. 4 "'\ HOUSE i d' ha 'ia•�°� . /2805 • e, �4 ' U) ww I 11 �� • (Bt / LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (per Certificate al Tills Na. 1168419) \\�' t / That port f Government Lot 4,Section 9,Township 117,Range 23,described ti. 1: / as follows:Commencing t the North a t me f soils tion;thence on LAKE q ■ bearingof South(the North line f the Northeast Quarter of said section \t,'- I s� -t. "` being eassumed to have a bearing of North 88 degrees 51 minutes West for �- `•b / purposes of this description di tante 12878.55 feet;thence South 70 MINNETONKA o `\ / ,- degrees 37 tee 31 seconds East a of of 838.42 feet;thence South \ 67 degrees 19 minutes 23=seconds East a distance of 266.25 feel to Point A. \` said point A being the point f beginning f the property being described and • also the beginning of Line A;thence South 32 degrees 16 minutes 30 seconds ,�• West along said Line A to a point on the shore of Lake Minnetonka, d said EAST CRYSTAL BAY Line A there ending;thence Southeasterlyalong said shore to a point an 0eel Southeasterly rom id Line A,said 300 eet being measured bearing of South 59 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds East from said Line A;thence North 32 degrees 16 minutes 30 seconds East o distance of 370 feel to an inter- section with a line drawn South 59 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds East from said Point A;thence North 59 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds West to said Point A.the point of beginning;a cept that part of said above described said Ply lying Southeasterly t Inc following rsutes ed line:Commencing is aid Pant feet thtoce the p point 5o dbegees OS ortI 30 i des East a encs f th 34 feet s of beginning of thefns being shore thence South 34 degrees 54 minutes 30 seconds West to the starts of Lake Minnetonka,and said there ending. Subject to flowage o t set forth in decree of which certified copy is of record in Book of Miscellaneous Records.Page 301 in the office of the Register Deeds of this Canty; •: denotes iron marker fond •: denotes Judicial landmark (9063): denotes existing spot elevation.mean sea level datum ---917---: denotes existing contour line,mean sea level datum 0 .. ore on assumed Bearings shown e based upon datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of an existing house,trees,spot elevations,topography and al visible"hardcover"thereon.It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. Pen pass. I hereby certify this seec0cotio or report PROJECT GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. lowwas f the a aY Mi Swvsyon Oder'the 4-11119 CIVIL%NGINN%R8,LAND SQRVSYORS,LAND PLANNERS s of tihs Slate of Minnesota nal I:.p, ■`�Tk/,— 445 NORTH WLLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE,MN 55356 Mork 5.GrDMthe 0era 1Annesoto License or 12755 sP-j11 952-473-4141 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR "°-51.m WS Wm 01 Cm `1/114 \ IN GOV'T LOT 4, SEC. 9-117-23 •11 f ~ ''v` '. A \\\ HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA " I '='' \\ N. -,sHowri M AT Ngo.1467 m \..,jam• N..--,I 7--- \ JreC \.. / \ csrao.d \\\ yellow-75'lakeshore setback / \�> "'On F �t \ purple-average lakeshore setback e°/ \ T green-calls our setbacks rob/ ;' \\\ �`sl�r p s1 \ \ / •1 \\ ��d \\ m„I/ '\ %/ // \\\\ I�� 246..14 9 \\\ ( CO M.A I/ N /\ \\\ \ V' // //N. •N \\ /� u= T y \N /7''�\.1 t '444 I /2 / \\ N \• \ // /tea l f /// /L(� l \\ \\ / / , I\ I ///<:, \ \ // / i�jw v�rn NSM \ \ \ �/ / .. c' j/ / • f ,./i, /F/�% mac OF s�nuo --\ ` , / (0/7/ 44 / ,)0 / / .—r �- / B 0h // e; `i jai .--- \\ .\ \ ° hyey // y/1 f/'6./ / A) 79j// nue / ��� �. N // '6� / "z aT l ate«mel ,...-_-_..--- ---"S...--__—________/- d e N. \ \ ,� \ ±// / ,,/ we rte\ • \/ / / v . s, 41110 • „._.,,....-;1,,/ i0.r, - �l \\\ I�I t •. /I,. — PROPOSED .y • / \ \u i' 1 �� I/—`� DRIVEWAY \ .1 / ib I f, / < �.11i► A � , �1 ,p/ 1 © p' ®I i/ e,,, 1 - ��,' / "/ \\e ®40-0 / a 1 \ •,.'e;>•-'5,....:.... �� `c, _ PROPOSED \ e / /-- '< - 4 1 I \ \�\ ,,�/ (0 \ DU``$E11/ / / / ,6.0 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: (per architect.verify) \4� \\ 125 �./,.,y j� / % / �` 1)Garage=194261 Z) *A / rob 2)Top of foundation 1940.31 R 2 Z.-- __ $y \ / 62 3)Main floor=194361 4 ->\ -\ ` aelal 4)Lower garage [KRA MA D.el. \� \\�\/ / ® 4)Lower level �\ 5)Lower level storage=10.32.51 LAKE .SI.3 \ �',, , -...,-../ MINNETONKA LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY;(per Certificate of Title No.1168419) \ - fro Thot port of Government Lot 4.Section 9.Township 117,Range 23,described s follows: Commencing at the North quarter earner f said section:thence on a bearing of South EAST CRYSTAL BAY (the North line of the Northeast Quarter of said section being assumed to have a bearing f North 88 degrees 51 minutes West for purposes of this description) dislonce f test; 5 feet;thence South 70 degrees 37 minutes 31 seconds East distance f 83842 feet;thence South 67 degrees 19 minutes 23 seconds East a dislonce of 266.25 feet to Point A.sold point A being the point of beginning of the property beingdescribed and n;rout oleo the beginning of Line A;thence South 32 degrees 16 es 30 seconds West along soid Line A to o point on the shwa of Lake Minnetonka and said Line A there ending; thence Southeasterly along sold shore to a point 300 feet Soulhe0alerly from said Line A, said 300 feet being m sred on a bearing of South 59 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds East from said Line A;thence North 32 degrees 16 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 370 feet to an intersection with a line drown South 59 degrees 05 minute.30 seconds East from said Point A;thence North 59 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds West to Said Point A,the point of beginning;except that port of said above described property lying Southeasterly of the following described line:Commencing at said Point A;thence South 59 degrees OS minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 246.74 feet to they int of West to of the the honeefb Lake desMiMibedathence SPdut`34 degreeshere e 54 minutes 30 seconds Subject to flowage easement set forth in decree of which a certified copy is of record in Book 85 of Miscellaneous Records,Page 301 in the office of the Register Deeds of this County; •. denotes iron marker found •: denotes Judicial landmark (908_3): denotes existing spot elevation,mean sea level datum 1410.6l: denotes proposed spot elevation ---817---: denotes existing contour fine,mean sea level datum 9® denotes proposed contour line(per architect) . 0 20 40 80 Bearings shown re based upon on assumed datum. MMhi 1. iiei This surveyintends to how the boundaries f the obese tlescribed property,and the S C A L E N F E E T locationon existing house,to be removed,trees,spot elevations.topograpy and the proposed location of a Proposed house,drivowoy and grades thereon.It does not purport to show my other improvements or encroachments. DATE ,,,.enure h reey=rt.n 11011hie plan.epe=inuanan.ar(=part PROJECT GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. ,�,r and ti{the Slate&oir Nlm eeda Land�6wveyor=under tM 6-17-t9 / (,7VIL BNGMNER3,LAND SURVEYORS.LAND PLANNERS ' w ���,� /_..3 1.20' S 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE,MN 55356 .w w.smees.r..sw—..v Mark S.Ca. Minnesota Lice.Se Murree,12755 6.41110 952-473-4141 ' CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR 8 �° "I°°°•" �1-�' m�\ESKUCHE DESIGN GROUP • S /� JC~ v E /� IN GOVT LOT 4, SEC. 9-117-23 A ` 7714: ,3\ I \ HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 1 1 { — \\ I ~�-�. \ RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES AS ,\�' �, 1 I \ ��.__.—..\\WN oo RLJi.M.teen \N ��..---........b4 / t\ \ C \ 'S j0'3T, �4,,_ :. \\ Ss9o� �i 7� \\\ a% S , '\ i /• \\ Ivy 2ys) \\ w,., . / \\ s \� \ \°\°p i /% \\\ •0.,..„._._ \ Nic. �// \\ CO T ;/ ; x -_ /; /// N N N /f ``f,. • /// / /_ l�'T N\b \\ /• / •' �� } ( 1 -- //i// \NR\\S N. mom/i�: %, /• / f i \ /, /4. POND I POND N. \ /// / "1)7 a /. / eget•. \ , \// // !'F/• J f ^J / AS / --r-----�--� N / (c)' / / p..,,,, ii awing ../..''' ...-:". --� `\ \ s N I// / r` �� //fes — °e' \s /j/// \ ` f\ // A. �/ i O a u j 'Lsi • . \ N ,/,i -.....,k/• .so. *4 \.,..-----.-----..% •-.... sT „N./4 I ....„. .,..„...... . ... , 4) .�\ JI `t 1 ..___,.>,--'-',..,-"-----7 � , PROPOSED, hti`F • i. \�\� I t°B w,^`��.:., "��_ PROPOSED 11 y J DaE nC w I \ p) \HOUSE/ i / 70 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: (per architect,verify) ��0� \ \ ''.`',•,, ` a /2805... / hp 1)Garage=f� ,"ut ,-� _ -T)-4$. i / h%' 2)Top of foundation=MEI '',,,, '-.'....`„...."111:7,,_. \0 '•"'"-- :.m- ___ ?/.f-- y 3)Main floor=9ar--3,71 uuMe cs raA-•'s\\\ ;. ' a\�(at X78 / a)Lower garage=1932.51 sawn rAte 4; \ j 4)Lower level =1932.5] \\ / 5)Lower level storage=1932.51 LAKE ,q-... /" • MINNETONKA \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY:(per Certificate of Title N.1168419) • .�` That part of Government Lot 4,Section 9,Township 117.Range 23,described as folloe:. Commencing at the North quarter corner f saidsection:thence on a bearing of South EAST CRYSTAL BAY (the North line f the Northeast Ouorter a saidd section being assiLmed to have a bearing f North 88 de e 51 minutes West for purposes of thin description)a distance of 5 feet;thencee South 70 degrees 37 minutes 31 seconds East distance of 838.42 feet,t feet;thence South 67 degrees 19 minutes 23 seconds East a distance of 266.25 feet to Point A.s id point A being the point of beg'n g of the property beindescribed and also the beginning of Line A;thence South 32 degrees 16 minutes 30 seconds West along id Line A to point on the shore of Lake Minnetonka,and said Line A there ending, thence Southeasterly along said shore to a point 300 feet Southeasterly from said Line A. said 300 feet being measured on a bearing of South 59 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds • East from said Line A;thence North 32 degrees 16 c minutes 30 seconds East a distance • of 370 feet to an intersection with a line drawn South 59 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds s East from said Point A;thence North 59 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds West to said Point A,the point of beginning except that part of said above described property lying Southeasterly of the following described fine:Commencing at said Point A;thence South 59 degrees 05 minutes30 seconds East a distance of 246.74 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described;thence South 34 degrees 54 minutes 30 seconds West to the shore of Lake Minnetonka,and said there ending Subject to flowage easement set forth in decree of which a certified copy is of record in Book 85 of Miscellaneous Records.Page 301 in the office of the Register Deeds of this County; •: denotes iron marker found A 0: denotes Judicial landmark t;) (ae.3): denotes existing spot elevation.mean sea level datum 1910.81: denotes proposed spot elevation ---Cl,---; denotes existing contou line,mean sea les datum • 0,40.0.0 40 — > : denotes proposed contour linearchitect) Bearings shown ore bosed upon an assumed datum. 0� — 80 This au y intends to how the boundaries of the above tlaxribed property, nal the 5 CAL E N F E E T p location of existing house.to be removed,trees,spotrelevations,topography and the proposed bcotion f a proposed house,driveway d grades thereon.It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. DM MUMS wYAww® wascredrgy°Mt this ;specification on sspe t PROJECT wGRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. .«r.sew. —andRot he St tedulll u tensed Lana 6mrveyw umdW toe / CYRIL ENOR000ea.LAND 9URVBYOR9.LAND PLANNERS Vs � « 'e`er1•=30• 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE;MN 55356 «v "'®•ea'w'..A.m.wws writ S.donees to L1c wroer'2755 41190 952-473-4141 . E BESKUCHE 0.1171 .f,. o..p...,..w 53391 .000 my dit LAKEVIEWS v RESIDENCE NORORN Q si 619OE2605 N.SHORE DR, 4 4 ORONO,MN 55791 GOVT ` •� /LOT 4 h` iiir k 4 Ill Alkv. r'o 4 y' 4!'-‘,.4. � �4` � CONFORMING �t �If�yi, 4 t/ ALLOWABLE `! ` BUILDABLE AREA A `\ -9116 EXISTING NON-CONFORMING s4. HOME TO BE REMOVED LAKE MINNETONKA \ v. EAST CRYSTAL BAY N. VA u \\ 1A7 JUN!2022 1 CONFORMING AREA 2 SHEET 2 E 02.544,044 1404.„ De.pw.en.MN 55301 .. CeaMOM 2022 d LAKEVIEWS`e::: ...... HpRRFOs7,7, RESIDENCE sw311oRONo,m30 f"8 i • GOV3T� �/Y� �‘ �� / • • • �CpT 4 < • ;\ I1 ""te/ i 0 '4 %•'- At116 :,::s,=---. _ . . 1 l /J ` * a Ilk C11111111111N1 13,610 sq ftEXISTING 6,368 sq ft EXISTIN LAKE MTKA ti',At RENCH CREEK&LAKE MTKA LAKESHORE HARDCOVER o„. LAKESHORE HARDCOVER 3,946 sq ft PROPOSED'i., 9,180 sq ft PROPOSED LAKE MTKA \`-.. �,� ••FRENCH CREEK&LAKE MTKA LAKESHORE HARDCOVER LAKESHORE HARDCOVER LAKE MINNETONKA \N EAST CRYSTAL BAY N\` vAnAKa eesuewmli 3luxe 3022 \ a 1 LAKESHORE HARDCOVER AREA .2.....F.,,—:......1 SHEET as 3 • 0 6 /W.4%6vy C ESKUCH= a 410 DA•pluivan..AN 53211 l \ • % • Rrys e •S7 y p�� ` .8110o.. \ "` �AKEVIEWS tr7 ; '� /''••„, RESIDENCE 3 - 4' vr0/ `` 2605 N.SHORE DR, k's.4.4. „: PROPOSED --- ✓/r '1\ �; ORONO,MN 55]91 #27 v liM, "f 4 f.: 4 s� b . „. . .,.. �/ I I. nl .9.' •tee`•-� /' ., %°i _. t ....,... ,, . _ . - jj7+ ��6 ` .J .aEllr � • `�� VQ, ':` • 'I : r!!4. \ �,y ,Ae ` All--Att4.- ._."-, .'-;ii. /'''...- 'N. . 4.' 41, '.,/,'/- --- .W11111111.1111" "MA ,4. . .1,,-.7--44.,-,ii • E ESKUCH m54 'a.,.wa.• ur '' c.RpIRN aav t i' s:,,,,,,itos,...%. � LAKEVIEWS • oR b.4, RESIDENCE • N •'t NGRry '.e Q`S1 SyOp,.' , 2605 N.SHORE DR, `Cb�� F mN 5 ORONO, 5391 B • /,..,:,' r ... , . , , li. .. 4„.,,.. ., . , N, ilettt., . , _..,... .,,,, ,•,• • ...,!.., „.. . • ... ............, /.., ,,, . . . , . k -4- --4,...--0, ... --,,,-... .. ITEMS IN RED TO BE REMOVE. ,• 3..<.,~� ,/'•• *' REMOVE ALL GRAVEL GROUNDCOVER s..... " - '44•' • '�\ RESTORE TO GRASS w e REMOVE ALL CONCRETE WALKS a GRAVEL GROUNDCOVER RESTORE TO NATURAL GRADING WITH GRASS .0 LAKE MINNETONKA `N tlir EAST CRYSTAL BAY • VARIANCEAMRESUBMIT.U �� Trvr+e Urn .e 1 EXISTING SITE PLAN \`, i 5A t2 SHEET >0 4 p 5 0 r E SKUCHE p „R Y L. Copyright NM R1 � .� LAK �:- �71a��.r j— 41*":' ' RESIDENCE Y!'.atra•�i.�R.a.�., ,• - y --.....s ' 2605 N.SNORE DR, ° • 1.4r1.4r-,i'•• ORONO.e6N 33391 x dtiti,4,', k. 51 0 Cpl■Ae I 'w .. i-..,,. ��1t r . iM 8 tet. ;-. ,s^a� g VARIANCE RESCIOAC-TAL , .v 6 • • E OM —v . .,,,,,'. ... E-- !.9-1. 1.70 .oe.. 0. s,«.+.Blvd mA EM CARTER.*303] LAKEVIEWS .<.wR.. ..R.� ..�..a RESIDENCE 2605 N.SHORE DR, € ,- ORONO,MN 55391 #:$IAREaEiuRiRc w.uR KARL ROOSTER ORNA A --, �E,0WPw„ERREw V e :it', $' F. PAVER MOTORCOURT EXISTING TREES �, REMAIN WHERE NEP ETA-WALKERS LOW/F11 POSSIBLE sr�PE�s-\ �RaEos 4,1 11. Voir* - HYDRANGEA-ANABf LLE 4 , I ""16.;I- ..x EXISTING RIP-RAP TO REMAIN r vAUANa REsuRYrtTu 1 PROPOSED LANDSCAPING 1 3uN3m 3 I � / y SHEET ' oi 7id ,= ,!= i... 0 0 a. + . "r� i!, ' fi:�x. .¢yrs "„ :,..ii.(,.....:- } ,� ,'I ..�` ESKP UnMCzoMzz�eB . LAKEVIEWS a;" a E �' - RESIDENCE .: p. S, „,..„..,..• .:. . ....:, , .i r " �?, 2605 N.SHORE DR, ,•..'. `` ORONO,MN 55391 s. - : 0 L j i . , +, 1. mow ,,li -,AC• .11;,,,...te t ,77,...1- .... P ' .z;.' . ` VARIANCE�iuHE�az�RESUBMITTAL '- (/((`�(^'EMOVE ALL GRAVEL GROUNDCOVER �\ ?1 A6•'." SHEET 1 ' EXISTING LANDSCAPING ',,, ,...„,....., 0 • PC Exhibt D E LA22-000028 ESKLJCHS IMO N.ININNEEINE INN*,PAN EEM VRYEON.77 OMiti LAKEVIEWS RESIDENCE I2605 N.SHORE DR, ORONO,MN 55391 I '011011' .3' '411111611 111.111.111111111 I11111t � t • _ 1 • X17" ' .yam. . •, R:1' s,�t , illo = EXISTING(SOUTHWEST) EXISTING(SOUTHEAST) ,0 4 ate',._ - - - .. • . ,3E. r 1 R }tis =w 4w.,5 ~ y e� 7 II l v.1„,---s. y • lb ie. sem , • PROPOSED(SOUTHWEST) PROPOSED(SOUTHEAST) VARIANCE INSUBIAITIAL 7 JUNE 201.2 IMIIIIIIIIIIMIN SHEET 1 • 410 C ,.w _._..._..._-._._..........._ 1 ESKUCF� 952.344.3... o..otio...,.H5.5391 - A , Copyri,2022 almnimilmil A — LAKEVIEW$ RESIDENCE ,_- 3 I ...., 260511 SNORE DR, -- -------; t ORONO,MN 55391 I w ::_il 'i I. i S I f • S` 410 i i �..r 1 �L., , W .... LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN iv*OOM01BON*C,TO* •rreox sf-3,92.5 fN.v[D.sW c.ew..eeo eM.cploew. aPAW.ln COLD MOIL . -- ' DUNK W. I VARIANCE ♦t 13NR 1011 r - SHEET U 9 0 • nIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIII _SKU rE .1 ill imaSirilliWillffill ,...... ammemeeeseemeememesseeeeee .....r Eleeplaven,A.33391 CRpyrIOR 2022 SIO I _.. ...... j`� i .�:�..-ice ..ti ..I-.. ...r�i[, y - �1 �— II ! t ...71.1.-.1:J.' .._ 31 ... r 'r� 1 I '��iiin LAKEVIEWS T RESIDENCE II 7 11.111111 ORONO,SHORE 55391 rj. Ii! .. iiia iE _....-------------- 'I • . . ,,i riir 11... ,. . . . 1;-:T::-LL:71:TI:T117-.LTINP:',•:::;-::':-:-.. E ..‘, . . ' . . h-,i;11,--,727 il,E.---.17...: :..;!Zi:.:.:zi:::::,:4 .. ,.. 1111 — I 1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN CCP CERENG MEOW=r-1E, .,71r .1,ns TERRACE.na COKREO OUTDOOR CARINIC SCALE 0 VARIANCE]TUNE an/ Al i 1.11.1111 ! SHEEI I \ — ' '' 7* I ni 1 S • r-,-, E ESKUCFIa ___ r 7:11 os:s 44.44 o.. MN 33301 ,,.,,,," a�. Copyright 2012 LAKEVIEWS ! NE '. NIA 01111.1.111. ..----.."1k*. T - �: RESIDENCE ---- — __ —._.W' 2605 N.SHORE DR, ORONO,MN 55391 �f —4_________4________4_______4_._.—.. 4444 4,1,71 1 NORTH ELEVATION ---------- ._._._. 4_4_4_4_._._..._._._._._._._._._._._._._. 4_4_4_4__._._.__.__._.__._._.__._. +VLSW... • ■ � w- _ ...s _ .J@i'S MIt^ . =. I - I I - 4,7"..."'". L 7 tisri ........... 4444.. ........... .... — '' 2 WEST ELEVATION aRIENORM i_�— m " raw.. t m VANN.885111118117Al -- -.w,...yµ ® —1...m.... SHEET 11 11 3 WEST GARAGE ELEVATION _.. l • " w w • 0 E ESKUCHE 932 3.1.1 3844 10311 minneenlca 114. Deepharei AtN 35391 C0,19.2032 ••••••• ,INMEMIEMP. .Kirr"". N. LAKEVIEWS WA hik .. ... 11111111 III IF_111161' -u Ill II ID .-. RESIDENCE Will-=----=:- E -==-..__-="."''--L.----Mil___.....- !FE ANN —Ma' ad -e-,,egrawe e 2605 RI.SHORE DR, .r,, ORONO,RAN 55391 - - ,••=11•1111111111•01 ,..____. I,. - 1 El Aseceaveae 9=1.......MEM./11611 Ilia 1 1.1.1111111.1111111 A 11110111111111 IIIIIIIIIt T- • 1 SCAJTH ELEVATION em.w= I_w wilma a ;II • allINNINIE ..z.,....—.... +77r7..." 1 ARmiiiiii Rd= ,-,-_•3-- III 1_ i /Iii r -.- --gsle ,.... ... ... .--=- ............-........—____., ....... 1 ....&_-;."....,,...___—_?.....-__....."...44012. _ ..„ 1.,,,„„_____ _____ .. .... ---- -_ vort.- - i ._• •••&imaff: Ir.. 1-, - 2 EAST ELEVA ION -MI =......- 1.111MIMIIIII VARIANCE RESUBAUTTAL 7 JUNE 2032 MMiille SHEET 12 3 EAST HIDDEN 1 • • . • 9 91 91 9 MAW VALE I le PC Exhibit E LA22-000028 City of Orono .3.-oN� Hardcover Calculation Worksheet • Property Address: ;_, ► 26-g5 /V ORT,y SNGiQf DA/I/6— r!T�Ror►tE� \-`:+-#5„034 Prepared by: Date: y_2 S-/ PGRovQ F'2 G f 01)J C; /it/C, 9 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) 1111101 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: STING HARDCOVER) In the following tableidentif, all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total uare Feet) ( q (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A ,(/p/.(SE 3$68 S.F. B QECK 762 S.F. C Fou,r�'Tii/A/ _ y02 S.F. D Q/1/1/Cu/AY ,'4lMett/ E LC'o, 7 GU4LKS LQ, Y77 S.F. S/9 �/3� !77 S.F. F COA/C. 1A Lk 7 r z S.F. G Rvck u/ALk f STEPS /65 S.F. H A/C /OADS 9 f 9 = /8 S.F. I Gv'&O .9Q/DGE 65 S.F. J Go,vC. .9,4'vQ GE • /64 S.F. f f ,� K SrE, // D ,t iiC- 41S.F. L GES-p.(0,L44LL ,/Lc,./2,S' 2/ S.F. M CaR.C_ Fe/t PI4c,c,e.,(7 EA-Pro.rrvCf 56. 56 = //2 S.F. • N O/(-GAR 7 S.F. 0 G[/dOQ At S.F.ire ERS g P AE 1A/ //�G [,v46CS S_I S.F. Q Tit/e,UGu/. 4, CorvC4f76 6 S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.S.F.F. w X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover /'7, Y 3 C S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): P REr4i.v,. -c 4.4-d^c.L5- 83 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 83 S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)] /7,,35 ? S.F. (4) Total Lot Area $l, 2 I3 FXCt. 44 fic,-E D/t. R•o.[, f /rt/Ca. F,t.c4-c'N CA-CC& 8/, 2/3 S.F. Ao.vC Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] 2/. 3 7 % (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; • however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8 of 9 City of Orono 0 .:;1‘..o.vo Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: Zia S =f t, 64. �t/OATA/ J'NORE DA/VC CFTkwcN / GRc tc DE `'r=,.p0.` Prepared by: Date: �AorvB6AG v4.AIIOC/ATE'j inx- 5-i6-22 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) CT& Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2:l9POSED HARDCOVER) In the following table,identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Example) (Garage) 24'x 30') (Square Feet) � (720 S.F.) A //vuJG f Gcim.., 64A«L5 53 y 9 S.F. B _ CPUEA4'o Ea/TR y 4 .1'7'100P 132f '!2 / 7Y S.F. C OREllEGt/I Y _ 576'9 S.F. D DECK 4. 170A G E _ /2cv 4/73 137'j S.F. E [.!/aGD BArDGE 65 S.F. F cpfc.T'RFff BADGE /68 S.F. ow.,Rri o o, Gecr./.. .0 2 2 2 S.F. H li/A 4.k A.vv J'TFP.- Ye 7 S.F. I Et.,TRY At 0,4.144+s4 Ct/T7 ~ !'sir S.F. -I A/c PADS 37 S.F. K 4/AA-1 75 S.F. M• �FrAl�vrn/G fit//LlS '/27 S.F. NS.F. O S.F. P S.F. 0 S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover /y, 067 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): L- R ETA14.,'.e/G 4,41..45 f 2 7 S.F. • S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover '/2 7 S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)1 i3 6"3 y S.F. (4) Total Lot Area 87, 213 eXCC, N,Sh'oREOA. A.o.ci.0-/..,cc _FAc-,t.cir CtC a</D,c,j 8/,213 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] /6.79 % • Subdivision Application-January 2016 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 19 PC Exhibit F LA28-000028 0, Date Application Received: June 19,2019 Date Application Considered as Complete:August 8,2019 AiLOIi 60-Day Review Period Expires: October 7,2019 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members yet �� Dustin Rief, City Administrator �kESHO�`` From: Laura Oakden, Planner Date: 19 August 2019 Subject: LA19-000049, Eskuche, 2605 North Shore Drive,Variances and Interim Use Permit Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variances for hardcover, buildings, and retaining walls in the 75' lakeyard, average lakeshore setback,side yard setback and lot area; as well as an IUP-Alteration over 50 cubic yards of material within the 75' lakeshore setback to construct a new home. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the proposed variance and interim use permit. Background This is a unique property in that an inlet from Lake Minnetonka encroaches into the lot, establishing an additional 75 lake yard into the lot. The applicant is proposing to build a new 411 home, replacing the existing structure. The existing home sits forward of the 75' lakeyard setback, about X feet from the Lake Minnetonka and X feet from the inlet. The applicant proposes the new home further back away from the lakeshore,Y feet from the Lake, and Y feet from the inlet. The proposal includes the removal of hardcover on the west side of the property and turn this space into a usable lawn area. To minimize the inlet encroachment,the applicant proposes to move the home closer to the east side property line, into the east side yard setback. The proposal also includes new hardcover for a patio within the 75' lake yard. Due to the existing home being located in the 75' lakeyard an interim use permit is required for movement of earth over 50 cubic yards in the lakeyard. To remove the existing home and create a lawn space as well as construct the new home, new grading will new done within the lake yard. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-305-Builing Setbacks: DISTRICT LR-1A Required Existing Proposed Street 50' Roughly 290' Roughly 235' Side (west) 30' Roughly 90' 105' Side (east) 30' 24' 19' Lakeshore(main) 75' 30' 46' Lakeshore(inlet) 75' Roughly 50' Roughly 54' Average Lakeshore New Retaining wall exceeds 42" • LA19-000049 August 19 2019 Page 2 of 6 • Section 78-305 -Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2 acres) 200' Actual 81,213 s.f. (1.86 acre) 230' @ OHWL Section 78-1403-Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 81,213 s.f. (1.86 acre) Allowed: 16,242.6 s.f. (20%) Proposed: 5,729 s.f. (7%) Section 78-1680-Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater I Total Area Allowed Overlay District in Zone Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier Tier 1 81,213 s.f 20,303 s.f. 17,353 s.f. w/in 14,450 s.f. w/in (25%) (21.37%) 75' (17,79%) 75' Applicable Regulations: Lot Area and Side Setback Variance (78-305) Zoning Code Section 78-72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district.Substandard properties within the Shoreland Overlay District, like the subject lot, are able to be redeveloped 41110 without variances if specific standards are met; such as: 1. All setback requirements can be met; 2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer;and 3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 25 percent of the entire lot area. 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. The applicants request for additional variances results in the property's inability to conform to all of the standards above.Therefore, lot area variances are required in order to redevelop the property.The ability to develop the property consistent with other existing developed properties in the neighborhood would be limited if the area and width variances are not granted. Average Lakeshore Setback, Buildings and retaining walls in the 75' Lakeshore (78-1279) The existing home sits almost entirely within the 75' lakeyard setback. The new home will take advantage of the existing homes footprint and massing. The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance due to proposed retaining walls which exceed the 42inch height maximum. The retaining walls will establish a flat usable lawn space along the side of the home. Retaining walls are also shown within the 75' lakeshore along the front/lakeside of the home. These walls will sit in the same footprint and the existing deck and will be used to create the patio/terrace area. • LA19-000049 August 19 2019 Page 3 of 6 The new home is proposed to meet average lakeshore setback but the building will encroach into the 75'setback along the eastern and western edge of the home due to the property being almost entirely surrounded by lakeshore. Roughly 1,000 sq.ft. of the XXX new home is located outside of the existing massing and is a new encroachment in the 75'setback. Hardcover in the 75' Lakeshore (78-1680) The exiting home covers over 21%of the lot in hardcover the new proposed home will decrease the overall hardcover to 17.79%. The new home is proposing a new patio/terrace which takes advantage of the existing patio footprint. The new patio encroaches in the 75' lakeshore of the property, roughly 75 sq.ft_The new patio and building encroachments are considered new hardcover within the lakeshore setback. Interim Use Permit- Movement of material exceeds 50 CY within the 75' lakeyard (78-1726) The applicant is proposing to cut roughly 310 cubic yards of material and fill roughly 650 cubic yards of material all within the 75' lakeyard. The existing home is located within the lakeyard and to remove this home,add the new home, and restore the grade for lawn space grading work will need to take place. The proposed grading and home are not out of character with the neighborhood. Governing Regulation:Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider • recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed variances are in harmony with the intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The goal of the ordinance sis to reduce or eliminate improvements in the lake yard, the proposal shifts away from the lake yard as much as practical. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variances to develop a nonconforming lot of record are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of the home on the substandard lot,in the proposed location within the lake,and side yard setbacks, appears to be reasonable as the property's reduced size and • LA19-000049 August 19 2019 Page 4 of 6 • orientation with respect to the lakeshore. The hardcover and retaining walls proposed within the lake yard appear to be reasonable. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The lake and its inlet limit the building envelope for the property. The surrounding lakeshore is unique property feature of the lane and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances are requested in order to permit construction of a home designed to fit the character of the neighborhood according to the submitted information. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat.§216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable,as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the LR-1A District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. • 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property's substandard size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore creates difficulties which may also apply to properties in the same neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The property's substandard size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore creates difficulties which may also apply to properties in the same neighborhood. However,the location of the lake surrounding the building envelop is very unique to this property. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.Granting a lot area,side yard and lake setback variances are necessary for the preservation of the property right of the application. The retaining walls in the lakeyard and average lakeshore setback, hardcover for the patio variances facilitate the use of the property for the new home and are necessary for the preservation of the property. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variances do not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant. The variances are necessary as the property has considerable practical difficulties affecting development. • The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. LA19-000049 August 19 2019 Page 5 of 6 Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the • impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Applicable Regulation: Interim Use Permit (Section 78-1726) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant an Interim Use Permit (IUP). On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted,the city council determines that the use will comply with the following: 1) The use will meet the general performance standards in section 78-916 of this chapter; The grading will conform to the standards within Section 78-916 of the Zoning Code. 2) The use is allowed as an interim use in the applicable zoning district;grading of materials are permitted within the LR-1A zoning district;this statement is true. 3) The use will not delay anticipated development or redevelopment of the site;the proposed grading activity will be conducted in conjunction with the development of the new single family home on the property.This statement is true. 4) The use will not be in conflict with any provisions of the city code on an ongoing basis;the proposed grading activity will not be in conflict with the Code 5) The use will not adversely affect the adjacent property,the surrounding neighborhood, or other uses on the property where the use will be located;The result of the proposed grading will not change the intended residential use of the Property so there should be no change in the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties resulting from the lakeshore grading. The grading work on the Property . as well as the forthcoming construction of the proposed home could result in additional noise,dust,vibration and traffic on the haul routes and immediate neighbors. To the degree possible, negative impacts should be limited and mitigated 6) The use will not impose additional unreasonable costs on the public;the lakeshore grading should not impact any public roadways. 7) The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty;the conclusion of the grading activity will coincide with the finalization of the construction of the proposed home on the property.An as-built survey shall be submitted to confirm conformance with the approved grading plan at the closing of the permits. 8) And the applicant agrees in writing to any conditions that the city council deems appropriate for the use, including a requirement for a financial security to ensure removal of all evidence of the use upon termination, and restoration of the site to prior or better conditions.The conditions shall be set forth in a development agreement between the property owner and the city,which agreement shall be recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Deeds.The conditions of approval will be documented as required. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has provided supporting documentation regarding the applicable Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. LA19-000049 August 19 2019 Page 6 of 6 • Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds applicant is working to improve the site by working within the existing building footprint and massing of the proposed home. The new home is further from the lakeshore compared to the existing home. The applicant is also reducing the overall hardcover of the property. Due to the location of the existing home in the lakeyard, grading will need to be done to remove the existing home and restore the lawn and for the new proposed home. The proposed IUP is reasonable to allow the construction of a new home. Engineer Comments The engineer completed a review of the grading plan and found no issues. A more thorough review will be completed when a building permit is submitted. Public Comments One neighbor has submitted an email in support of the project. It is included as exhibit F. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? • Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the proposed variances and interim use permit. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Proposed Survey Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Narrative Exhibit G. Neighbor's Comments Exhibit H. Annotated Survey Exhibit I. Property Owners List and Map • • / / pw / / ��.`/ w \\ g g' 9 z B / w/ \` \ ''. m $s3eg- d fie$ 2 E ao� o / "-/ \\ \\ s $€e d a d8�"sgs aR Ap otgi w ti / w ,�: 4 z s El a 4 -ora �`iiita.!• S iri WZ z / N I /i \s B. 5 0 4 - aeagea l!RPal:: it a § $6- :al pU� / �� \ / �j atWt[g $�=� ssi� °3 $ q aag' w�� w1-1 cn w?: e / 'Y / +� •/ .1/ e s 3 = �._So d' 'spi �g'x (a d 8"s6 w- Q O U :y / 4 Q / \\ / \ 111 agerill S'Fg yK69 ! �wW>w % V`' .per / \ / �/ / $s :$.$ °� @ �a1o $.a ' z 4 % /} / M. $: II1si €g tirdOzx /I Gy0 4�� j /'�/ fyM { 8� i g l ,¢ es gg I QE yy pd 6 §q / N 'c / / I i 6 TiliAliii*V.i. °d °xag�8III Y 4 a 8 S 8 3 iR is $ I w/ / / / I1 af ,4g, oW/� / \\\ / ,r/EO/ II / ,,0 `1`1 - $$ Sos_lg: . • ' g 0i, Egg? gg \\ /r / A 1 8 /g#\ / / / \\ \ - \g d g '`' a i 0 11 i /_. Y X\ O @x e \\\ / . - ! u'_ t�,'/ /� I!L // i ,' ./// Z >-•'i .), 1'i -4�_ \ \ f'A E-, a ! �' /: '\( r \"°°/ems, 7,8 W F a V ? 1 ig CD cn a1� � �`�a aU2. i a � Ei1 end 'er `/ I e 3!f etl • • LAKEVIEWS 2605 N.Shore Dr. Orono,Minnesota iz CONCEIT DRAWN. mr. 10 AM 23..r 2010 UAW'2010 d' • BEFORE(SOUTHWEST) BEFORE(SOUTHEAST) • • �, Ago I .r fig' • ,. 4 ., �:.. 14. ` o _._,, PROPOSED(SOUTHWEST) PROPOSED(SOUTHEAST) esKucHe vcn c+aur • • IN GOVT LOT 4,SEC.9.11743 LAKEVIEWS HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA • of rte, 2605 N.Shore Dr. •=e7.i".1;x Orono,Minnesota d �111111111°1°441141111P,,,:''''.. s RQ I I:4e 4 ti 40_0'PTy 'E `S7 sy mem to my me 3 717:j.4-0 j' if �� .. : 0?.i/1 '''- - ---?-.-7,illiCIN617.".-411111111101e7 '' .''''' • ",„„:.v' _:. ......,4"'JUL', _.„.....igAiii.L......_" 7-41711761011%.„4, - ''41 „ ••,„.. Is- irivr' . 4.,......"- Ir -............:-.---,4 - F y. 1(/' c ei- p4;., . 444- ' 7 ,,, `\ /w II"JJSS "Nit eh Ct 5 trEw.swRARE To eE RE..ovFn �- lic.4 ' 01 Ai v o ... .- o ;. :V` STING BLUE AREA SNOWS CONFORMING,ALLOWABLE FOOPPRwR LAKE14, \-\\,....„41.,:_,„...14-1 •' . `� as MINNETONKA *`< EAST CRYSTAL BAY SITE CONFORMING esKucHe • • J S 4B LAKEVIEWS !,' .,...t.,,„,....,:-..,:-;;,,,, r co.Ro 1/4:'-': ti �G�_ \ �:,` NOH ��S, 2605 N.Shore Dr. I:S'`. F 4. \ Orono,Minnesota D a' i a+ . 't'> FAp_ ..e, 7 `` a R.e d"`._ :Ai 3 • • 1 NY.,_ w ZS NAV 2019 20 NAV 2010 RMtoR • ( `4/ k' .•�• \`' ` 30 NAV 2010 \ Ft Slut 1010 v d/ 1e NM 2010 ....-__--,..----;,.:&44 , • :4-4. 0440,6400.1111""‘ __ .7 . -..--z-,„-iiwros4,-,e, . • , ip;;;:-/- - 47‘... _ 7,14,1/4 7 • _ -.••••:-.•• ,,.„ , ,,,,0 gt." itt."4„. '), , Af • ITEMS IN RED ARE TO RE REMOVED ,. ...�`r,,� 4 .,,„..,-,6•,..„47,....441,,,,, -4 Qt-;�: , 1,1 P LAKE v. MINNETONKA �`,"•-•` �'� "v- • . 4 EAST CRYSTAL BAY ., ,J%(l 1\� r u` AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK BASED ON ADJACENT HOMES - • 0 20 00 al S dA 44 T r ` \ SITE PLAN C• ir dJ// W/ADJACENT HOMES .▪ 4 z esKucHe 0E214N GBDUR ro� R. i • 1` LAKEVIEWS IN GOVT LOT 1,SEC.9-117.27 HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA !�. 2605 N.Shore Dr. C,,=7;',,�._ Orono,Minnesota •4 • `- •• 0 e iit. N yt44., f Q 4.7 6194,„, ,044,6. WHOs23 0.4.,12019 0 MAY WI, IMF 2019 Gov / '-1 „0.1010 :j----...,:::..4;4)t..:.......) v,:tle;..,..., N ----:- j..4-- `, i _''�, :• n • ., \ 0 4, 9 ,E f.; 440 illi;`= iligt;- '''; . 4 \ IrNi.1‘ . - / 1 • ___%.'-' LAKE „= t MINNETONKA '< co a ao 40 00 EAST CRYSTAL BAY ,, 11 NEXISTING SITE PLAN NN esKucHe NDESIGN GROUP <.PMW.1. • • LAKEVIEWS t '`tF... `,` ,�, c 2605 N.Shore Dr. tiot i� Orono,Minnesota • A yr .: ., BOXWOOD HEDGE AT * _ ENTRY STONE -E MONUMENTS 22 MAY2010 2.1.1,010 A. KARL FOERSTER ORNAMENTAL GRASS 20 OW/IMO \Y S r +R '!' r i.IMO 2019 1. SAME 1.1111.1 . 191wef919 NEPETA-WALKERS LOW HYDRANGEA—ANABELLE F 0 V ARBORVITAE-EMERALD GREEN y \\ AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE IS THUS) .f RE AIL Nj E P . ll ilt AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE TREE #, J \v/\\\\\ u iif.; .fir �_LJ �_ ..... „, ._ WHITESPIRE BIRCH Ori 0 20 AO 00 tMa. LANDSCAPE PLAN esKucHe FSION OROUP • • t ty' LAKEVIEWS E ' _ R�. • iNy-X°t -_ I' oes jxq, 2605 N.Shore Dr. `.� , E..,6"' b se y �� BOXWOOD HEDGE Orono,Minnesota - .. A. - MOTORCOURT , ERE E +, fi a E � , A RANBO EST BLACK WASHED..Nose.,ROCK a _ Si RE r."-- .4 f -♦ { MMUS ORM • ARBORVITAE ., ... * its il•.. I . ..2019 ..._ • �E. , • ,,,..• .i GAME LAWN ;,A 4, = MN • rm. v*:-,. itst, a aA, ti ti • i .44(01.L Y .If. el �R .+' ° ..'' s AST_ a `� REMAIN Ilp .^ ✓4(t(Ur*i N • ;� MLR,.RIR-RAP TO REMAIN.1 t i V i • R , at g •Lei� ORO-SET TERRACE WITH SEAT LEDGE IZTI :' - I,' P, " r i .•t_ ow r L' t'� BOXWOOD HEDGE KARL FOERSTER GRASS HEDGE •••,'Y _. EARIfOERSTER GRA55 HDX.E LANDSCAPE PLAN &. T PERI.MErEA OE RETAI.*.G WALL (• 'LRAM GROUND COVER AT OUTSAE EDGE Of ALGCH PLANTING RID AT PERWETER Of GAVE LAWN esKucHe 0 • L. .4,` " �� LAKEVIEWS 2605 N.Shore Dr. Orono,Minnesota " lir �o,. , ,r ., , _,, ,:, . , \ \,,,ititt___t e$*Iiirkl*11141414111111r' -**°#'4. it '''''' aE R,R * I,f ' , -, *114 ,-';' ' , Tait- , -' N : Z l 4 ,. ...„„„,..... . , .., , „..., ..., . ..„ .... v�• i il . .„.t. N L. <, .w�renD.E N , --------"--------__Till______ GRAVEL TO RE REMOVED � —_ EXISTING LANDSCAPING esKucHe ax Dour • i LAKEVIEWS 2605 N.Shore Dr. Orono,Minnesota c CONCEPT POMPOM 13 MAY1019 25 M.2019 2e...2210 REVIM jy,e Mpg • 0 y a LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN TTP.GERM MOW=WO- APPROX.S.F.=SAFz CRAWS♦SAS STORAGE r > Ky .> v v GENI y 0 trr esKucHe • • 01 LAKEVIEWS __ 1 2605 N.Share Dr. Orono,Minnesota i 14 CONCEPT aA9 , 23..2019 ,11...19 ;9WT3010 ._-----.—.J 1 PRa r-VAR1AEMIRO/ 5 NNE 2019 VARIANO MT i9AMr2019 1 I • g _ \ — - 1 I 1 ---- 1. i - C p MAIN LEVEL FLOOR f LAN �rM.CDW9G NIGHT=1114. I APPRCS.SF.=9,101 FIR+8AS GARAGE+S/9 GARAGE+1,975 TERRACE+319 SIDE STOOP+]1I COVERED EMI' %I ,. v \ 1 GRAPHICSGEF e AL esKucHe n. DESIGN GRo9P LAKEVIEWS 2605 N.Shore Dr. Orono,Minnesota II r__0 I I mum 30..2010 Pli-VASUANCS MEW 1.14.201. II UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ITP.®UNG HEIGHT=9,1'A. APPROX.SF.=0,001 RI.+MO STORAGE h GAJ UPPER TERRACE r r GRA NKSGUE [I L esKUCHe DESIGN GROUP • 0 ' LAKEVIEWS �. __ ___._ ��r ���.... 2605 N.Shore Dr. �-_— _ ._._._.._._._._._._ ,,.... Orono.Minnesota assin E��� ir III .III=ate �ii ■. �� _moi. � —.. z - �� �_. l.�� iMas si Tai 4 _��� �e . - ria _i _ '._._ 33 ANY 3019 �.mm.� slue mia WALLOW,411 NORTH ELEVATION(STREET) Ir a mIE • a➢girral�.RlT—_"--. i �? —. a� . Iillr 11 I. IIIIIIIIIIIMI 11111•1•01"---- EAST ELEVATION es K u0H e e rr r v w DESIGN GROUP LUGAMIC SE r•NPN NNE S • g•-..9r-• wir..- LAKEVIEWS L-4... r_---_---4 nt..• —41,M-- 2605 N.Shore Dr. W..-....=-,- iota 1 Orono,Minnesota im...-r."-- I i A.__ ........ M..r N.T.I.. ,... --mil 111 111—=-P ,..,, Ilan MIMI .:-M-W--I S. ---"•-_:-E Er---'-=-•-.------------ ••.9 ":422..... WM Zi E ZIP:=4"; 111 •WIMIIIIII 7 *AI . ist-t.... . j At----4----77---1 1 = 11 = =111'ZIT .......1.- — Cm': .. 4,-...... ' r----,--7,01...._•:-_- _==--- -Ssee--- alaf-_-- aie--_-:- T.-..-..Tog~=. :milky*:.---------- - ----_ -.......-_-. —W ---sil :=.,..,_- ...-..m..--, ----,...•,.....A,%, NI AND'2010 P .., 30 DEE 2010 --,.--='-sw•-•,.......--riamasiv.....-7.1.61,:r•mrair-ealk:,...=aiirail-re.,.-4; Nig—rae- 3 DON 2019 1111-VIDIESICE RENNIN - - —..„1111U1 '-'47 3 AND 2019 VARIANCE HE IS IONE 201, SOUTH ELEVATION(LAKE) --vTIVrf.4+— • --------------- • . "47_ilnih- ; I .. . .... Is, .., . m,.....=.v. i-:- .1q-_,:71.-, WEST ELEVATION(HIDDEN) ' cemenrA q--zepse wi............-_,-__=- BENEES:-EA-•,--,-..---.. -.1w.........- =.7,-"'"!"' ......-.....: . ,....- `Al.l." ....- 24- ,....; atm - "AP .-. 1111 ki ..., 1...... oprg.1211.11 -,i.--j.:„--------- -:-....,-:.,..--,,7:---.,f,"-: ....Z.:"4-‘,1,-",..."? esKucHe WEST ELEVATION(CREEK) DESIGN.0, CAAPHIC SCALE ODE*WO 1111 City of Orono • /8Laao Hardcover Calculation Worksheet (\4 ,I� Property Address: 2 6 Q 5 A/OR TSS/ INGR F DR/1/ .. -�- R o,k 1 •fit:Now Prepared by: ,., Date: rROrvQ F'2 G f y-2 S-/AI. ;iCIArESo //tJC, 9 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) MP Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1:QSTING HARDCOVE In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key o Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A AzvbtfE 3868 S.F. B ZECK C A-Ou.r/TA/4/ 9 E2 S.F. D Q/1/✓Cu�nY !D, Y7 4-if , g77 S.F. S.F. E FJort'T £d kS _ F CO,vG, 1.4..111 Lk `/`t /33 _ !7. S.F. S.F. G Rork L.(14Lk 4 rrf / RS 7 r5 S.F. 9-f H A/c ,04.05 /8 S.F. I GvOaO .9R/DGE 65 S.F. j CowC. 9,4r.aGC- /b'ej S.F. K srE#f f La -/1 i4jr y q S.F. L GfA,..P4d/[vi/..L �/LL.(RS 8/ S.F. M COR.C_ Fit P/tt,t,ti,l7 E.vl0.rtiCF 56 L 56 = //2 S.F. N /44AR 7 S.F. O /,.• eV I2kfER5 II S.F. P AEr i ,iv G4�.S-AS.F. o 7 //A/Cu[..14. Ca,vCRr7E 6 S.F. R S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. _ W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover /7, /3 6 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Cote Sec 78-1684): P REr1/Adex,G frvic.c3 83 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 83 S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)1 /7,,'S? S.F. (4) Total Lot Area al, 2/3 EXCL. Ai.I'c,tE 04.. /?.Q.c( ,f Mice.. F/t.c c7i CACCIS, 2/. 2/3 S.F. O o.�C Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] Z/. 3 7 % (Proposed Hardcover next page) IIIThis is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8 of 9 City of Orono 03-42W0 Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 2c0, /I/oR r .r/W/26- D R e./F (6-3104(7/F DE1/G.vGRouP) ‘14-e„ " Prepared by: Date: u-Ror /t9FA G f A5'lac/q TCF /.tic. 9 7-/c,�y Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) GM Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2:( ROPOSED HARDCOVEI) In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30'1 (720 S.F.) A „you SE 551 7 S.F. rr a t 1'rePY 2 2 y/ S.F. D 41 r_11I sdC4 Sr R.(e/EA /tf 0 7'0 R C ougl- 62_33 S.F. ENTRY Ar 'iv M f.f /y S.F. E Lt/ogO BRrgCC CrXj'i:'i1vG) 6 F Cee CrtE7f etiocr ti 8 S.F. G .2Fr Lc 327 S.F. H CpJERE9 E'NrR Y 2 i 2 S.F. S.F. S.F. K _ S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N _ S.F. S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover 777 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): /4ETAiruir</G wit 443" 327 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 327 S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)) ,/ YSo S.F. (4) Total Lot Area 8/, 2/3 Exc4. ,-1w 1)4.R.o..uJ, ,r /VCt. Fdr41CN CAVE-K 21i,2r3 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)) /7, 79% I Subdivision Application-January 2016 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 19 • Re: 2605 North Shore Drive, Orono, MN Eskuche Design Group Peter Eskuche,AIA 19 June 2019 Variance Application Honorable Plan Commission, City Council Members and City Planner, We appreciate your consideration for the variance request to permit a replacement home at 2605 North Shore Drive. We have worked diligently with our Client and have met with the City Staff to develop this proposal to achieve its highest and best use balancing the client's needs, a cohesive architectural layout,and the city's planning guidelines. We received and listened to the feedback from the city and as a result have made modifications to the drawings to address their concerns. The lakeside setbacks are the primary practical difficulties.We have provided a site plan showing the conforming building area which illustrates clearly how the unusual,irregular shape would create a completely dysfunctional home. In addition, French Creek flows through the property creating an additional shoreline from which to set the house back. This water body occupies a large portion of the Westerly portion of the property. The existing property has a very small amount grass area in which to recreate.The creek divides the property making all of the upland area nearly inaccessible and what area is left is needed for vehicles to access the home. The existing home is almost completely within the lakeshore setback,being less than 28' from the lake at the closest point and only 88'at the furthest point.The current home's floorplan is obsolete with room arrangements and a layout that no longer meets the needs of today's marketplace and the current homeowners. The existing home is a negative eyesore devaluing the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka as well as the neighbors. Our proposal reduces the proposed lakeside encroachment from 27'-10"to over 47' at the closest point of the home's structure. If the average lakeshore setback was considered, the proposed home would be conforming because of the setback of the adjacent homes. Our proposal reduces the massing of the property.We have provided before and after visuals to show that the proposed structure steps back in layers away from the lakeshore, reducing the height and proximity to the lake. Due to the extent of the setbacks,the design of the proposed home is narrower than the existing home by 9'. Our proposal reduces the proposed hardcover by 2903 square feet and is conforming. Our proposal reduces lakeshore hardcover by over 33%. Not including the lakeshore gravel covering,the current landscaping includes well over 9600 s.f.of hardcover within the lakeshore setback. Our proposal was reduced to 6,340 and returns all of the gravel landscape cover to natural grass and plantings. It is unknown whether the existing gravel landscaping has plastic underneath,however it is currently an eyesore and very unnatural. We appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing this application for the proposed replacement structure. • From: Melanie Curtis • To: Ashley Mehbod Cc: Amir Mehbod;)..aura Oakden Subject: RE: Dan&Heidi Martinson Date: Tuesday,July 9,2019 8:00:47 AM Ashley Thank you for reaching out. I enjoyed working with you on your project and appreciate your kind words. I will share your comments with our other Planner, Laura Oakden (copied). We both worked with Mr. Martinson and his team and she will be handling the Martinson application due to our current caseload. Hope all is well! Melanie Melanie Curtis rek 952.249.4627 ®Jncurtiscaci.orono.mn.us All permitting is now done through our new online portal -LINK. From:Ashley Mehbod [mailto:ashley@pixiedustinc.com] Sent: Monday,July 8, 2019 9:21 PM To: Melanie Curtis Cc: Amir Mehbod Subject: Dan & Heidi Martinson Hi Melanie- • I hope this email finds you well. It's been a long time. Amir and I met with Heidi and Dan Martinson over the weekend and we had the chance to review their house plans for 2605 Northshore Drive. We understand that they are seeking a variance to build inside the setback. We signed the form to indicate our support but I also wanted to reach out independently in support of their proposed plans. I told them they are lucky to have you leading the process and guiding them through approvals. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Melanie. Sincerely, Ashley Mehbod 2625 Northshore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Ashley Mehbod PIXIE DUST 1612.306.373- www.pixiedustinc.com • 0 .I- /, /\ \�.\ g 11; N w ��y'a(gys,) r�0VJ / `\ \ Y $ `�iBc :ie _ €fie{ srigyy3 (� N F , - M \ i �ei�izi�{ Si•San 8 O li J 0-4 wc� / }� \ \\\ _ s € is�,•`55ss ' +z Fg ,` �ijZ WZi z / a`Y 1 ./V/ `' w\‘ \ i asi�gy,.egga9i€iz_ F! g �i �� 5.1 ��vUiF S / « r e `d i: i o _1._Ks;�d-;€z�}�.s �E.o i iib w o�.in �'- // h ,� / °/ - S. 1 S 'fYi,i'j5#1_S a �Ef .; . i i 3i i wWFo �s / O' 4, / \ .• / f$e3 zcig„-.. z{ t ag• , F Q o ,� / 4 / / \ i..•i!zj a.($'b 7.i € ; 1 ° o $a, cap 8 z e / 4� / / • /r.._- sel=ip: �9a S„ i'z „,F @ I I3w , , X? / , pzs(st _ iz / h1P01110.• s�; a £[ l.g W / 4) $� iR$a a bn 6 ° •<s1 �1' I $O , // % €:fl4f 1l=68Ea 2S Y{ !' a R a 7: a g fir C �,4-- / �`\ ;' ' ,Lø' 3'3 €o It EpE�ii • • 9 C11// , / / / `\ / i iI I 6q ,, �.\ i •7 elip 4.31 ,..,, ....,, 1, •ii/ .. F. C.3 rn -ffffl 44 I1I vd y I;ff1 0 11 11 1111 11 11 1111 11 11 11 Doc No T05640544 Certified, filed and/or recorded on Aug 29, 2019 12:31 PM Office of the Registrar of Titles Hennepin County, Minnesota Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles Mark Chapin, County Auditor and Treasurer Deputy 130 Pkg ID 1866636E Document Recording Fee $46.00 Document Total $46.00 Existing Certs 1484341 • • This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document. • �gOJ CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL VNO. 7 0 1 3 ‘'k-ESHos- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-305, 78-1279, 78-1680, 78-1726 FILE NO. LA19-000049 WHEREAS, on August 7, 2019, Peter Eskuche("Applicant"), applied for a variance from the City Code for the property addressed 2605 North Shore Drive and legally described as: Legal Description of Property: (per Certificate of Title No. 1168419) That part of Government Lot 4, Section 9,Township 117, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at the North quarter corner of said section; thence on a bearing of South (the North line of the Northeast Quarter of said section being assumed to have a bearing of North 88 degrees 51 minutes West for purposes of this description) a distance411 of 2878.55 feet; thence South 70 degrees 37 minutes 31 seconds East a distance of 838.42 feet; thence South 67 degrees 19 minutes 23 seconds East a distance of 266.25 feet to Point A, said point A being the point of beginning of the property being described and also the beginning of line A; thence South 32 degrees 16 minutes 30 seconds West along said line A to a point on the shore of Lake Minnetonka, and said Line A there ending; thence Southeasterly along said shore to a point 300 feet Southeasterly from said Line A, said 300 feet being measured on a bearing of South 59 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds East from said line A; thence North 32 degrees 16 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 370 feet to an intersection with a line drawn South 59 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds East from said Point A; thence North 59 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds West to said Point A, the point of beginning; except that part of said above described property lying Southeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at said Point A; thence South 59 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 246.74 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence South 34 degrees 54 minutes 30 seconds West to the shore of Lake Minnetonka, and said there ending. (hereinafter the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section78-305 to allow lot area and a 19 foot side yard setback; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow average lakeshore setback for retaining walls which exceed 42 inches in the 75 foot lakeshore; and w 1 i CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7013 G, �l1''ES H Off' WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow building and retaining walls in the 75 foot lakeshore; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1680 to allow for hardcover in the 75 foot lakeshore; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for an interim use permit to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1726 to allow movement of over 50 cubic yards of material within the lakeyard; and WHEREAS, on August 19, 2019, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at • which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on August 19, 2019, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance and IUP; and WHEREAS, on August 26, 2019,the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and ( NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variances as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA19-000049. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2, The Property is located in the LR-1A Zoning District. 3. The Property contains 1.86 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 230 feet. 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25 % according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. • 2 p CITY OF ORONO • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ;$* NO. 7013 t�KESkio4� 5. Applicant has applied for the following variances and interim use permit: a. Lot area and side yard setback(78-305) b. Average lakeshore setback, building and retaining walls in the lakeyard (78-1279) c. Hardcover in the lakeyard (78-1680) d. Movement of over 50 cubic yards of material within the lakeyard (78-1726) 6. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. VARANCE ANALYSIS: 1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance . . . ." The proposed variances are in harmony with the intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The goal of the ordinance sis to reduce or eliminate improvements In the lake yard, the proposal shifts away from the lake yard as much as practical. 2. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan." . The proposed variances to develop a nonconforming lot of record are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of the home on the substandard lot, in the proposed location within the lake, and side yard setbacks, appears to be reasonable as the property's reduced size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore. The hardcover and retaining walls proposed within the lake yard appear to be reasonable. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner;The lake and its inlet limit the building envelope for the property. The surrounding lakeshore is unique property feature of the lane and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances are requested in order to permit construction of a home designed to fit the character of the neighborhood according to the submitted information. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd.2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 3 i °moo CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL G� NO. 7 0 1 3 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the LR-1A District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property's substandard size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore creates difficulties which may also apply to properties in the same neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The property's substandard size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore creates difficulties which may also apply to properties in the same neighborhood. However, the location of the lake surrounding the building envelop OP is very unique to this property. 10.The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Granting a lot area, side yard and lake setback variances are necessary for the preservation of the property right of the application. The retaining walls in the Iakeyard and average lakeshore setback, hardcover for the patio variances facilitate the use of the property for the new home and are necessary for the preservation of the property. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way Impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12.The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variances do not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant. The variances are necessary as the property has considerable practical difficulties affecting development. INTERIM USE ANALYSIS: 1) The use will meet the general performance standards in section 78-916 of this chapter; The grading will conform to the standards within Section 78-916 of the Zoning Code. 2) The use is allowed as an interim use in the applicable zoning district; grading of materials are permitted within the LR-1A zoning district; this statement is true, 3) The use will not delay anticipated development or redevelopment of the site; the proposed grading activity will be conducted in conjunction with the development of the new single family home on the property. This statement is true. ip a k • -WN„ CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7 01 3 4kESHov-t 4) The use will not be in conflict with any provisions of the city code on an ongoing basis; the proposed grading activity will not be in conflict with the Code 5) The use will not adversely affect the adjacent property, the surrounding neighborhood, or other uses on the property where the use will be located; The result of the proposed grading will not change the intended residential use of the Property so there should be no change in the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties resulting from the lakeshore grading. The grading work on the Property as well as the forthcoming construction of the proposed home could result In additional noise, dust,vibration and traffic on the haul routes and immediate neighbors. To the degree possible, negative impacts should be limited and mitigated 6) The use will not impose additional unreasonable costs on the public; the lakeshore grading should not impact any public roadways. 7) The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty; the • conclusion of the grading activity will coincide with the finalization of the construction of the proposed home on the property. An as-built survey shall be submitted to confirm conformance with the approved grading plan at the closing of the permits. 8) And the applicant agrees in writing to any conditions that the city council deems appropriate for the use, including a requirement for a financial security to ensure removal of all evidence of the use upon termination, and restoration of the site to prior or better conditions. The conditions shall be set forth in a development agreement between the property owner and the city, which agreement shall be recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Deeds. The conditions of approval will be documented as required. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305, 78-1279, 78-1680 and 78-1276 to allow variances for lot area,side yard setback,average lakeshore setback, building retaining walls and hardcover within the 75 foot lakeyard and an interim use permit for movement over 50 cubic yards within the lake yard to construct a new single family home, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings, 2. The approved project shall conform to the survey dated 8/6/2019 and plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. • 5 • CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ti� NO. 701 3 l"'KESH��� 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (August 26, 2020). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result In the termination of any authority granted herein. • / ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this P(� day of , 20n ATT.ST: CITY OF ORONO: I 14000. • Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor •. • 6 7013 •CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR L -�v__=.„,iri `i' -14,` +d T\ESKUCHE DESIGN GROUP 7 �,.... \ IN GOV'T LOT 4, SEC. 9-117-23 i5e ` _. A\\\ HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA i •: Illi // '',,,i''' y�' ,11 r, \ Cb • '"'0.-r F I4-. / / S9 \ 'L.3__ ./ ' h ; \\ �O o„P ATO \\ �'� •/� N. �T�S IVO sl \\\ 1 GUV' yi X N \ . •nO O // /& m..`3a'.1:73 vwln'."/ �� N. `\` N. d AS' i/ •,�''/y w\\ ` I`,. 11 ......,-;:,-.--...,:,r--•--' - �'.--.,.. 'moi \+X �' // \\tt • ° ,) ,, yam/\. \�``` Ill 1 /' 410 \/1/ ' /n, (L ® ♦ \\ � ��.�--'r++- 1\-/ / I(;\�� "r IRa9,�:A.rA,f0i,1fR1'0.RI I{ ter:, 1'�p. /%/''' WS 1AR11 �(ci`1 , \/ .......... 7 ,,t \ n�PROPOSED,� `.� / 'i.av • ` �. \ `k• SHOUSE 1 / / �� ,.\ �. 12605 pI�\, ie / y° .M+1+ ., 1 ` \ ``\```-� _..____ y SCALE N MET • p� 1\ r1•``a•ij PROPOSCO ELCVAnc.s, (p.ecNlnl,v.ur) �a.:"iM1,7 ''''ttt..�,, `�N ...``.. d,_ (else', ,Caa9e-. \Z}('•�. N T``I\ 2)Top el Iwkelbn- ,......,..„,,,N `' \ 3)ua.,row-EMI'' \ \ `v\ 5)Leer Ind slew,.? \\\_\ �r `` �i' 5)lose Mrd alwcq. ala - LAKT/ \ E \� / LEGAL 0E50901041 OF P40(241*;(pee Culhicet.of TNN No.1165419) TMt pert,gof 0ovumnnl let t,2.cli.,9,T,.n.Np 117,402a 23,dec,ind ale fob.[. (u:With F,0,'ui'm 440,45 014 Ouniv of sae..�ilm a we o cI.hhoo,of evert q South MINNETONKA 26 a55„� z.So41,1a 31.,413::3!N.�: 0 0400,0..7.036.,2 lett;U,.,.,,Seutl.6]'.91.40 19 m,utse 13..cord,Eat 1 601w.c.0l 15635 1.0 to P.141 A,add p.hl A 50"0 In.9400 el p.okruq of 0.1 pvp.rly 0.0^9 d„n2,.d and No the 0.91, M 491 of LA;1n..c•South 32 4.g1en 16 mMn 30 second.Wel do.9 • tld lW A le a 904,0 on IM Noce of La.Ii.nelenk4 end.01 10.A INN..nd.g; EAST CRYSTAL BAY 'than••SaOroel Uly den9.dd•hers lee pale'300 ful 3a.u.a,leny Ira„sold Liu A, d1 300(s.l La'vq tn.lwed en a h,al.q of SooU 59 d.pn•05 MMI.30.•wed. [osl from•oto St A;N,,4.North 31 aepn.16 mlvl•.30 seconds Col.a dslacs O htu.15.410 11in D fn.Bern Seu1N 59,,30 1 05 n9Ub1 30 lid ;eV/0,0'4:4X.2. Pohl A;440,5.Nath 51 4 purl l.OS 044 .•J0•herd•W1•t ly sod PdM A,.'l po'nl 01 oloololnq,.,0491 Ifew 090 el.ed et ao dP9,4.04 prep.rly South 0,day.I.A7 01 sed 0.3.991 monde F.4 0 stne..1 et 4f.0 0 A;IMnc1 of 59 d19/e.OS m1M1.30 lepra.Enl a Qulox..l 116-]1]al le IM Pohl of Wn4l la In.1 w1.ef ltd= and.tow O.0, ,(.r St,n'Mn 30 eco+a• 5.40.01 l0 fe0.9s...,,,°I •t 0501 in 0M 0.0,,.Fl90 of,lR•ulllsd copy i. 1 0.00,4 0 Doo[ 55 1✓,.4040,1vs R,cwdu poo• o e•.t•r On[.of INL Cmnlp .. denote Oen,e.01.r feud APPRONUAIE CV1/F1-4 AMOUNTS .I d.mt..300.3,0 L1.dn@M CUT. 1020 CY (101,); d.else 10.09.poi 04ve*oh mean.ea 4.4 delve Ill-1070 CY ®I d.olse p,wesed.pet•4votlm NAM N-50 01 _-.W.---• duvet.1.01491 cent..to.,nun.soh 4401 dolun . no • d.relo•pgw..d erne/Inc CUT/I41.A.IOtNiS N 0-75' IONS FROM LANE NO POW 5.0.4.94 dwln a.000•d won m 040000 4,100, CIT.310 CY 101, 1 ober,detu'ked bcelbnn a'( hl ie'i1ny:au:e,010 be..Mal v'ad,1m~s pol Wvollw.r,00.4144.4 and IRl.150 CY • the proposed loca0m of 0P op^. 614 d hank .00,ond 910114 there..11.dory 4.1 p.Pwl to.he•eny ether .O.vnw arcfnla ennvxnl.. .11•n •a 9l.,0.19:0 0 ,h 1,...,r..".1 PROJECT ^GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. ,n..w.e.....,... =r�b�IT'..•d kr,4 L .,d Po.,yy I,J}4., 1]_n L ,MU 9140INNO.,1AH9 6069[70140.LAND PLOW.. .... ,....�.n.,...0,...... `..../.• -_.��•y 141,4�V6y. 445 MORIN 0110*MK1.0143UAL,IN 55359 Nat 9 9•047. 1.04.1.tot...Mn4.12155 1.-1116_ 952-113-4141 M o _• r-- .11---1. I. —... E. x,, C3 z.. 'Iti ? nI 71 = f �L h ° F1 a^x.. ,« ,_ yV I•- Q ,o e On --J Q) viii • ° O p.S . r j l . i„):,,,',.., t' • (VA' P• ; .�9. A' ray ,n.5., A F X TA` ir} i e t t'• 4 if .A.. 'ilk• 1 Y { w • �"$ �„• £ ?( is ' ' 1. \ .� ,II. z.1 t, i. c: .'I. i1 • r:; it r F lir : k`` ---A;,‘,:% , 1•,..irtill .1„ ,A.,3:5„:„.\, ,, ql...,! ..,, ,t.: i,.., / %.11,_ .14.. . j,!: “-, pi(,J, jq rk t' 1f ��{ � r{ ,� ' ,' l r, � I Yy, r 3{ ti• ""' 1 r I y�1s . . d vI` jp ' z`f.-s it, f 4 • i , dlyJ e.,.. �j� I :' �;1 t 511 a, T��jd W fid•- "�7T f, • T 3 ,1 1 1 M S^° Q �i L�! I . Z m N' 1\—. j ry $ C 4 1i k'I U o ' • a w 13 v ` i W Z ZI b ) • ..- ,,, ..,;•,'„' 1. . (rt.; _jw.;:••, . • .),, ' -.• • t r; o; if .. • ...„. „ ,, ... .• •• / • .... . Irl; . ., j' , .I‘ : 3 \ i ) ' .. , ••.• _:•:, .. .. J I•". ,„ 1, 4 ';::_. 4-.. 0 ,,,,:.'':•i gt - ' 'Zi. ,lig • /it • sif. ,,,,/ iiiocAllp Ally, ././ ,-- _,. •... •• . „,,,,i i ,N,. ,. , .... ii, .--, lip I) , \s,,, ....,>.,t,, 1,, • ,, i:., 'M L_ , • r '� sX �I Op, 44.?,;,• ' , i � Z Y :� • O `'tea... ,a,' :.:* <!/��' V Z —\ 4,....,,, ,,:-..-ce _..,.` p• ® X ••. t • /. r,,Y) . '. / 1 f 0 i i z 3 ) • Pr) o f, 11 1g 11 $ 1- Mo • C„' W r `c <A RRRR p, a, ( -,:•.:-), Y gum , 0 8 Q No 9 r; �3 �° • i' { ,, - ,ci,- ale'r' ,k }'h f AS. .,rY,r� I.4 tit • r -.:fit„ ."1......1.4 :W. r. r S_4 �'t 7:,: '.4 - . itii: 4 4 .s. N� Y: '.4041, ,- •. -"Ied. . 1 ` 17- -' ' t F� '1h via ” �r 1 a yr� s `9 a t� rt, 3'•. Ate. .: 3 .. s, • v • 1.1 4):‘, C? il • 1,4,::/' 4k 4 H''''''''''461.144%( •• • • •-,, • „/,;(// I .'° \101001Ji. ., • ,., Ilhr . , ., i • .. ,h• ,,' 0 . is . .-A,24w64%_.„ 0 ::. .: • • .. 4'1,1 1,i, ., . ,,k A . „hit. w .41!„*,,,i.i:7 .... , / ;, , . .• .,,, , / , / „ / ,.. 0 ill \ I f . 1:-,7. ,,, ; , 1 ,, 1 f,li • '/....' / Ny• i•, . 1 It "41111.13p.I is,, ''', '*0".--, • ',‘, . 0 \ti / goe• v , AV 4J' dN . 'W ! t :"J tl ‘, _ ' /, g 1 . Irr \•` '4 /`. /� ,1 \lit i, ti),/ ti}l r .1 ) "I, +vi �-�i� W ti I , i I/ \ 4.9-- • .i- / , ;17 .- -,- / of,c6),( 0 ,)\,.,i ) IT-' ,,,fq I 4 '1,-.- - /..,,p 1 , , , . .,, ,, tli ;. / /.,./ sy,,/,'A ,i. Iv/ ,13 vr „, /f1:.6. .-- . id? •Et i -_,-Iri.$ i.. (lij — f2 a lc 1-- I' ,./,') I 1!. ..,....j h' ) - -:,._ 4 1., * - ri.,/i/•-.7.- ' ‘,/ ) i y , '1,f rn (2' i wE s � / Y 9i 1 "Il C. �- I1J cR Rit RRR CRR !' � - y �� >; 0 Q o Ei its ^- ` /�j P �y r ti /J/ < Np 8 t �� p �Y _l Il " it e W � \ .\, N- ,' \ 0 N \ \\ r� I N ' itiY \ \ ! "� \.,• \ dI �� � % rir 40 44, /\ , ` 4r. /0o O t• Q '�� QJU Y. / %Q' -Z / 'O W it % /so `b z sG / / •. . /,.../,/ 1 (f ...w. -1_4t. 0,---,v1ki‘„f. • ' } - ife g, lr 'i $ �/i`r .. 1, / , / /' li 11A f (--"' 1.*Ii.,.1,0:. ,if 71 /i • ,�, 4.d o 4r ..:C w ,qui; 'i �i fl,/.7k,,./. "03.4! ^� t''r �_ �_`N.Iv i W , ;,i,. ._•t\ I! s NI i / / / / 0 M € 4> • ° c li r ii sn g 0X. ^ f'"` ; vtoi f a g sA 'A i R u h �8?'A'�a S IUI w CD f� se d o Q^ ..�� r. 11 Ik?}lrr gl Uz I �i 3 N u i > kt K QW{ / 14:.;,: i A/;l .....•. fI • , • s•, 4i ' o/to � Niii. ..`. 4';‘. ( • , C L I ie'.) St ' ) ,t f• t Y 6? r �'o y: rr' , ^bti...1;14,,, • I IC , i1•,1.1..• � . • 44 s: '£ s \ a f• 1,,..„„(.•-•Niv•' ` e. rlka; ..a £ l l rl,. , g,�' Y, fp w • !f^•:.• ' '�. !. r. ;�T .f r S.S - r as. xt :-44.14,3w, ` ,� ;1/,..f: 400 C ,,,,,,,,-.,,,A, .� f......-",....,1 nA R1'T' 4 �4RP �� s :R ' ; 4�� • Ili .'3 C P4•i.,(.. • w:.1ts ?Ai'''.arr.. , I'', t : :WO•: Ii. )�(�:f. ;:t t it :ri1 14-`2,4.% Lt 1 iii Pi 6 411 1 _ ii4� A A_, o- 3 u < tt, ife �, ' ' '' u e g 1 3 1 • CD • o o �, Z l� a � . c'� v�N. `[ �r w d 0u . U_1 z t1„1E2_ � `]z Q .� Lf-P. ,` 0 3 N 711.11 t ww,r_eitav,..,,04.,.. :• ,. , •tli . , % ,...w,1-•1•.-,-.4%.`4U Il a l ••,v, 'r• a T,:,,=,,w as �,1�� ^ 4..,..i,`.�`�,A ` z • r 3 ”-:•x,;..'41i,�, i t e'''''f,:4.',,, t- R tc' r ` ;kn4� ri, �' x-jd 3Y'�i1 y� f:a F +.T-5 i 4 i€ t,' S t,, lay. j ' -4t S L rst?.%14 r'y,�y o Es q .96: IC-', ,.,y,.*' :1:c,.-C- .+nr 5,r-, r l 'S-i ie't taro .. .F 'r } ^°`+,ri {3 i•CrS-' arc 3,Z .- ^s {' t�t o r,.044$4,14 „.1.. . ,,,,v,..«.0.....,14 it.... ; g 0 „440,..Z lfh'E77 ti .W.n, , RI.z1v,„e„,.. ..s.....,,,i .1. ,.,.. .. 10,,,,,t.,,. . .,; 4.1 5 .. 1. ......,...... . 1 , : " '� ^qtr .�� w -ttlir a :4, 2 • r ° 1,611.:,:irc...:;;:i.!4_,_i74#4-,;;;:•.iV:,:;'-:::.!,1, t t ji ` � 4 :� ; � ` rel i , ry ' �, £�.; Cyt , r • ZW aa.,,,,•,,,,,i.1.,-,-4-.,4-4--0-44-40}�: `+rs-t �' 3„140 Itc-,,,,, ,' 2. ✓ p ,, IF C. If vie : &j .. slid ^r.` ,. ! .t'... WS -t, E ` �S d` gU --.,;•.!--- 6fi .iat� t.r • o-o 8g .- ;;•I''VA:''''.-. 4- •„„! 4 *` 7'„,,!'e•*--- „--: , ,..47-1#1.:.,o.it-iit7,Y,;.-.-...t.4 4.t‘,..' - t ,;,-*,.,-,,,,i_.,. .,::-,,, . #F t `'� .V4,----t ty` s5t t 4'''A''.1,‘ 4 �N V. ..t,';',--.., ri a: 1�(*',,.•a�f� _r g; ti:4 -i, '- '.t `� ��'#7,.! (,-,.,!.‘t., -vi .21. ! .4 t' G t+ re-fre- .+ s '.:i. 3 r �r.E-�r,....,„4,.. 4 § ..c'. '-'0,-.,,,:t,',$4. irM.z.41,-,i,. .,.- Pte•' t tft, t t t r,,iA . v k d' SS} S r,•�fk; ;f 't.i -,---P!--_„0...,:-.,i-t- �,+"-'147''' S. ' ''r a.• ;_ +4^,� 4ss, • aF}�-.....k'4,-S,'1,� 'a� {, ,44.0.7-, 4 a 4 ' 3f �" sF k [�3S ss r� � c j +hCG-0 f� ksr t11 t{ r i }, ,•\• .,•. '1,-::„.!,,,,,,..,: m } C'. f:• ? y i;s �� ,3 1;-�Cy$�,1��{,tTsr �: 64 iii }'•�t+'.�1'xsf{i _'"•1',�i�r' _ ,�:.3 iyTc cr�15t , M•x�{e,u ;.4) >>. .fir. reffp411 -7"� AYy 1..f� 0. . 'i.1.-''''''T i rh r\ jt f . t...•.+-,0.- ..,-,,- ..N.-.1,,,-,• -„, .•, , "- ,,f, . *".%.-'-'.iz,,-'4,11' -V,iwc,, • .A+j i ffy • tf ,, r' • ' tir. x'��i _Seri: ,. s tfr t ti . et ! 4 '''',74�F4 1. t '• t e' <r -.y f r? s ` .• I x: 3. 0.-fit,1: ,.p?, t ')b .40.-•,-,, + t, • .. ! � !* �i �.4,.•.;'„•'•,,'', ."; Qj j�Il1•.% a •'a� .,f.. CSE ',1,, �7 q, 30 t -• tk.;�i4��> -� ; � ":. x* {,. •„„.141.V.-.„1fi• �'t ,�• . • an rjhk ;t t y �,A- r�. ,'` rff Z`t ->:i . � ti2 .Y,�if}'��,r Y'� t +-z it Y t '� �J ,i }; 3 - �. ,,41,1 } -s ;te is .P,S jt..k.4.- ; t,. .f.JV ,.. .;�, ;04 ,':.v _-. fF 1 t/ r7 NZ'r ,I..t'Cr•�,,t..' ,yf,1,e .. kc�i., t - �f5't: * a* 1�� 4s�3. �Y1el hr....>. • -'w • y r N7 0 O n Aekh P, GR og A Y Za C�� w z k3 F# ? Ol �tg 3: ti Y °c G ?. it 4.1r �v ^ s. J r o 1 , �,k. CO " x . ,,„ eR , ',„.t.:,,, 7,t,`-1- iti ,t,i,, - %..-.,..C meq'; t. ` f t c �� 4. n3 , ...,. ...,. �� 4i„-- ,-4,-- >� t.s F y . ,, - • �5 vt A -•i„0:1,1�.= r + s,4 Gr. t.t. -1'. V '-‘41` t. -• F� yr •t`e -t: s.1.;,444;t1, +i w k+ z.,;14...„.,,-1 � ;} is'K i°e iY ? t { ` Y, irk tg } r Xt ;ter t1,. 1,'d • y"; • .Yit •••';',.. Y) -It { 1 { ?tt { a ' �^' i•.- ":-7-,,t-.:,;,4,,,- :r `+i ' { • •3„ 'f. , ./ ~�'ti l )" h 4.6,1.,,.',.4k ` din E1 `.' z Cog , ,, '•'1.;.1,5'.e.4044;•t - . 11, : ' ..� g etia �.. .. r Y >a{ gx t f sr 3, 4. a 4tt .-.:4ti. ° L'i� ,Q w�h,` i -. 4.,•' t, � r-{ y, i irt"' 4 si Fr , .Sid z-'•,r te_ t, • T0 c • - r ,� iP .� 4 fs 1::1:1V 'qs As" y r int 5 A4. Y `i, ..'. F c,7......-T, '-'01;'' -g,.. . 3 "..„•:::-,,,,: `er t' # 1 S °S' ,. j "'{{„ .rpt :y „,` ,,.. .,At, Its , gg rist a1r:t� L•, -,1,--4.:011:7.„.-.1.--,:e..4,..1 , r. t 3 1' �y & 'I'tyi.Y ''41'N'.4_,,sof- �} f rs u ,4,,,,,..„,,gT A' ..,,,,,.„-,,,:,,,,,...y.t - t- 4 . ,, ,'r + ,£r x iti,� 3 3 , t t{Y °fib ' -74., 7 it 4 4 tk s t Y ;�, t� �, a���a,;c.�'�`+. � xa4 � .. i,xit�'<4����� � }-,4•1,s1, k.,--;.P--' z r -3 ?• i.:,,,..!: (,, �� a �r�4�" c �;t� ' Y4°�. � int tr r�"�,x= �' n� t 3�' � ;�.�s t {: ;f r'�� 5' •y 1��,��2"� t E tt�� 2 �"E 4�t ti. A ��z. � R.le':::::::,,,,,,:7,0::::.:;.i.,',..,'':::-.,:::.,:,ixii y -+ ,' t,w ', a, ( A.,' bar + jam. - t ... N; �'`y,+, = "t ':' '1;5k i 5' t '`+5 }e 5 ;t $` 'f'' j• h1 r •,h,a. �t '$3 x�- Y F d.,`,g.,'-k r` ' s''T 7;:*f r'i " i�i rt i�i2 5 t, >I +i 'vP r �ott,'` '` ?moi �, i{N ^. [-f , 'f Y cr �.,, •s • a . e,..1,4,-,rtes t . x, ... ".a --, --..,i)-, `) , . v-.4-•.4t:,,14.4,4.41------- - ''Witt- ' . ' ',' '-••••04: A 0 -, ; ` ice 1 1 r S#+ , - 4:4cfc 40 r tJ, i 0L t:.9.it r .• 4 •"Ys -.:4'..4. Jti • e--f y -t t ' .iG6 ( r, it ...$f }' Y � jt QrV ; A i . •T‘":1:.4'.. -''' •,,' -.tem ,,f ' ¢ t A4 ( r` 1 z• k { NI3 00 �5 C:, ° {1 � fl 0 y € p. xaa 3" 7' y W 3 f J N (1) 1____...______.- [WI---.' i - I1 I Y A. Z AEI — Cl. I:, • R_t •I -'4 W '` 1- o z a N --— --1 0 C Z..' J N.... Q °� e f d)� _.1 N • I 1 •tl tE • i _ __ 1 I f I • \\LI I . ... gg • 7i 1 1 4 1 L4 C 1 • 0 1 F1TItIL • 11 ,.....____. T.-7! ., 1 1 ,_ _ __ , •.„.„..... , _ ....... ..„.. 1 I . i 1 Y '-i 1 , ..1 : i 1 i: .____. _ _ ........ _ _. I • i Ir? (f) 0 Q w r bhv elXiX lL Z 1 f� 1 o V r.R 3., 0 0 J LI z p -. LI 00, 3 J LT., gg$2 .J t g-. I r—Limmilik a w E , a _ -- d n E li 11 - ,, ii 1.i I1 t? P 11111 E 1v",,nCD T= 0 CD 5 ° R RRRo ;R FLA U- I! w z :111ii 3 5' 1 O CD _J -4.;:,, IF -- uef t6rPe b—K 4d -� t 1 IX le ie t Y ' la a, vIP k$il __q I---�'>—T"1'lrrr--r.r-.._�t�tl'�.,-.r•ti• `Tf - f 1 i r ',I' ., it, " '• i I 1 ...„,,,\.,T, , 1 Ir. � 1; 1,. p t `: idol..Al 1.alUl 11 uu LAdr 'v `{' 1 lir.. O ry 1 �� ) , I4 ,. t flt..,, , 1 yh•q I u , "i I, ! hl ,. I �ih i 1 f!.I , ry',�: S t1i1( \I 1 U ;i�y� Ii 1 11 . n ~I•. i i,lrl �''{r4 I <,i., to tll: illijli n i~ItiS;IfIIr. • ek i '• 1' 1ilttal ' ' 1 n1.'la 111111 I }t t ' 4 1 i{ iiii 1 1 1 • I .I. S;0,4111� 1-�L, ti t. i1 4 1n , ' 1�l 'h 1 rICf1 vqq' .. , . : .. i. II ,.. I ki i t' J I o t • IIfil. 11 1�,tY, 1 II,St� Irj a is 1 „,t I II Fn�� 1 1• 1 1.r.�!`!iI j, j:4. .J r S .., .111,1 I� 4*'QCiF. ,�X`t t� _.__ }tjstl;111 I{p� 1111`" !, ie�!�� i.' Rfi i. fi er. @ n' enmr," p a,li p IIm Ali:: ItC11,1 I• •tiit :"Ii:.''1 I l terh . { �;1��'111 1 Sr li ill 1'JSiI IS,r u r .+ • '11! _y hlt 4..6., 1•1 eln Il�y illtl3 1„ }'•, � , :'1.. 111 r tl,•r A,•r 6aar 11'1®er 11111` t;�1: tl•1;11411111 dr d a i ' " z 11�911 aig1,Iu1►I,eph!1gll��l ii@II1i1ialNl 1{y�1iri Rbll ` l!1, Ilii .4 i i l+ ' , o III li Y Illi 11�II I�F�II 1 ®10111 1 11C •.1.,31,,,,,,t Z 11 1 f 1 15_or `iit E .,:i' , I , a I' �1er'JAo�11rl�iP111r�� 11I'r'g111p 91,„ 1r 11 t .1 l I U I 1 lY'•I I. ie,. ,• ,r 1.I, 11, i, . t;1:,1 I I d hilt; 1,1! ', 1,01,11 0i f/ 1111111 I oil f11,1'•p vl l"Re.l r1 lry ` (II: 1i(Il1 T;$e g: 7 1 �` ui 1jd111� lai Itll 19d`111i1IlU©f Oil hQl 1l{'1 "yyt 11_ , Iy'1,'?'!i :"I �: 11@� �I1i t111 I IIItl11 1111 011ie I ' 1� I ' afla t€€fI11,rift'lli 1 '' 1111111111,1 11161 r1,Jll@� ,all18�1111111 1:11 u C,; E 3'S: . + " ,, ."I'' "' 1141/1.1.IIpjt11�11411 11111111111I1114i1d�II1 3'. I 10IFI 2 114 ' IALAd IA111i1 11 I„eL1e11,11 Ip1A fm .-4,,,31,,,,, " • 1 w III t ..,.,.., 1,,o4-il,k: h j 4. .t3�'- I • [ ,•;-;.41.,..fEI �I �' r t{1 � u 9 II _ 1 A a1ti r I I' t�,�'1 • 1 111! 1110111n1'q�re11n'®11f, "1` III ,. ,,,•,. 1®,�,� 1®,•,° ;,lif,":;6'1,f;S., 11111111111k111112111111111111!1"ee ° ``''` :N''I; 1 i1111�h11111. 51pi 111111111111 �•1 ( �ii�i'I1 � lle'll i u ' Iile lil Il�iit p1 1111 " Q 4 g J ' I . il rill e I lerl 1eI IYII ~ r.. ti,. II 1 : � 1.11,1 1:1(tAllI ll.rell<I[,1 ' x s I>i l 1„0 11,6,a'IP6,. .. r11� I I ,i '11,•: ,'1,1`11411lll111 1 1 1111111@1111) 1 rIII�II ' n '~ � �.,t • i r►=•y• 11 1,1 11111111 1}IIll gi 111, 1 f:, ~1 , -, t �1 1 1111 1 11 ll 'i 03, I .:' .:' .:.,1 -••1 ,31 1Ijil 1,1 1'. ,111111VII 11,11�u11,lI�u11�11, , 1 1 _�1;rix-rt ;, ii >,; ,a;11?U '®�III;I��®el;li;B®gd► , LI ,:.. I.ir s•,'•I 1° 11141414111!11101161 .:. 1,.'11''11 oel '•I Ir.g 'I, M® r,,' Then 4 1 r 11 I :,L 5:III (I ifil ; ig11 1111��91.1611 ;,ll 1 IIIIU;III'd1111 }N I;' I.:I:;-'1 11,,1 1 1� 1 �� 11 i1'•� E ,1E�rev;. `r.. 11if[4i,!c ;i o1II11r 1}11111, �111/I1 11�1i1A1 1 ilil1111i.1�1;pe �. 1161:61-11011101011101111001' II Iml r 11 E11 i 1ll� ,l- i �11!11 l:'o 151 iliolipllit 11`11 I lli ; I 11111�II fry!aebl ..•.„......,,':t 1+i; 0 • 1 I ii t'! • 6 m a P. rte M 6, , �' liJ .c c ,Iggi;ii fYi yK Uv i o` _ J o p nCO' W ) w, ,i t'S ,it it 1 ii I v ..,, A I t i ! " _�__ ih I NI ` ,� n — A.•',�1•, IIU. µ .. j', lti i iifn ti f i ,a1°. Oil ni� ` 11f11� g`,� ,`!i • 11 1 k' I'• I gill 1 i yi'`'p! 1.. +,' I/!NH y ;F aL`'` i I t;; I, I i,it 1 1'19.O.:;Iut I-i. 1"IIS 1 {'; IMII ,ati4n I�'i111111�iIIlI��! tI. :�il�i��110111.1 i 3 a., IIIII i' 5 - oil a iir t•� p j IV i ®1 ji1 Iilligi n Iilj®elpi .r, VI IIIII IIIII I,i61H��@ tiait (l l r; III IIBoIIII' I: I1II I , I Ai� (e,eI���tgli�IifililUr ' 1:4113IiIII1d�ll ,111 a4: V1 ; ; 1i I.IIIII I �_ .011,1 14 a Ill Ips II it�I. ilii , .IN ‘.:: -,,q q ,. 67,4 ,' t II IIIII IIII►q�i 1�di ,,:ti I nip il>A i poi ,k i rte- IIhe �� I '1' ;g -1111111 110400 a a I � ' , ,Irl1 ` ' r � I i .'I' IIIII I I 1 t I.t 1 ,. iv� I�10 r 1111111 II '�I, .:.,0.,„:,,,,ti10I;R ' ;I Ilu•,IIIIIIIII!I1i ?` a s -,I 1111111 < ' Ii IIII rill/ ,�ti,, - �7R "tsl!�;. f i 1 .1111111 .,•. Illi Mill `y,40 1 I�� I 4� + A • 11 ' ; {IIIIMPII OS 1 ' kl Ili I"I • i 1 ►►I Ikik y+t� Ifilo!Jt1 jq 1, In i � Iii . Ay. l'''''','''''"!1' +i ti',,4 1 ii it 119111 II .i 9 I 'i' •11) �=1111111 l q• 1lII I al` s. 1 iii k , I���°�I�IIII�°�I') .i, I , r.:1111111 , •II�!f i1I��1 M3 w 4F1 5. '' � r "Ii'�(�u='�hl��nl{ ' 1 „ i ;',21.,, Il Y'= 111111 U§ pil .,,,.h ,f 4 lai • a 6 7 .1 � 'i< 1 t•,: 1 ';I. I II i 111 4'''p41 11..(i• 2;y '�OM''. 4 it :.I. h j it,. I AP; I� , I IL I 13 s+ - IIII 11' ,I '11 �,‘,, .,,.0,...-611411,411.1141—g1 i; h , 4 1 1 i ----,,-,r • .., ' t1 , I,i I I (�i! ,�t�•I t �E I1�IP i s 7" jI ` .I111111 II 1 ik . I'm X11 I i,...,„,,,,...-4,...k ,,Y• IIII I 1 ...is;.,-,:,,,,..,:iI y 1.!t I k I I 1. h4Ii lip:111 z I I ,l I k � I' p4. 4 & i • o i I Aold Y, i • - ,I 'i ?� i ., I S:i�i Y 4 II ,�ri ; ,.4 "y ‘3 IIII�11 ' 3�5 tii ° �ll sltr�fI I • 1 �, q i,a q,a 1 • i, II F Ih.I ,i®I,�I .-lp�IPli®�IIIP li • 111 �,�l 010,11,!,t.• . ? I 3 I 1 , I I���.�II NI�I!II'1111iI,g11'111�,',�Will hw��{rzt J a i � 1 111 1 I I►f°lI•tl f I 111 41111 i �i •s w�+i�rawo `q1 t ;9111101111111111111111111 ' `.lo� Ili'1 i i . 1 1 .� , ,�y ;. ` �1,~ all X1111 d 111111 d Idills1l l 1, (n I; }.4. :,Lsy�k"r eli�.;li�e�ile.11l�eliielli_e�,1i r�.FI�L�:FHft i ''IIII '.;t,t'x`4, i I l .h3 ' 111 i 11 !y 1 • STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The undersigned, being duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Orono,Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at the meeting of the Orono City Council on August 26, 2019 with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this 27`1'day of August,2019. • Anna Carlson, City Clerk (seal) • • • PC Exhibit G LA22-000028 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR I (We) , AM t5 \jAr3 I i i+i15.�y t( of iQ;r iit•`-1 H .5fic t-f.. r 12 • [print name(s)] [print address] L,A+A eLi., VA-,%) 11 s-045j K have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 7 CO5 tJcrth Sko:a-br. also referred to as Land Use Application No. L ft'))---00.00.47 I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement s a -ttfat the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. 2 ' 2UZZ _ 1= -ewner Date 5- 12 3 /1,f? L Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building &Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM • I (we) ATA]a t•� :Ld i v b of k.Z.-c. t 0&TR St-I-0 vi- ba--- [print n[print name(s)] [print address] 1 -->HL -'1' AAi,K5'a0 have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at a7,;,,, '5 i'Jti'7`th He iL b _. also referred to as Land Use Application No. A, '7'L...L.,1 I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. O,,4,,,' Pro,ertwner Date ) l AA), tA----- cl .-.y\-1.;\._ Property Ovu'ner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. 0 Variance Application—January 2017 Page 15 1 PC Exhibit H 7 Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map LA22-000028 Date: 5/18/2022 • French Lake 1 • 'CIL*f, Buffer Size: 500 0 100200 400 Feet Map Comments: I ( ( ) I ) i i 1 2605 North Shore Dr. This data () is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (i)is furnished with no warranty of any knd; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal, engheering or surveying • purposes.Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from thb data. For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55487/gis.info@hennepin.us RUN DATE:05/18/2022 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 09-117-23 13 0007 38 09-117-23 42 0007 J L R KAZER&K A KAZER J A WALKER&S S WALKER • 1200 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 JOSEPH LEON RITCHER KAZER JAMES A&SHARON S WALKER KARI ANN KAZER 2685 NORTH SHORE DR 1200 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S ORONO MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 13 0009 JUDITH B HODDER REV TRUST 2640 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 JUDITH B HODDER KENT H HODDER 2640 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 38 09-117-23 14 0007 SPOTTED DOG LLC 1130 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S ORONO MN 55391 SPOTTED DOG LLC 1907 E WAYZATA BLVD#300 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 41 0003 CR BERGQUIST III/AE VANORDEN 2545 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 CARL R BERGQUIST ABIGAIL E VANORDEN 2545 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 410004 JEFFREY LINN ANDRADE 2565 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 JEFFREY LINN ANDRADE 2565 NORTH SHORE DR . WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 42 0001 JAMES VAN RIEMSDYK REV TRUST 2655 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 JAMES VAN RIEMSDYK 2655 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 42 0002 D J MARTINSON/H M MARTINSON 2605 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 DANIEL JOSEPH MARTINSON HEIDI MARIE MARTINSON 4225 WILD MEADOWS DRIVE MEDINA MN 55340 38 09-117-23 42 0003 AMIR A&ASHLEY K MEHBOD 2625 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 AMIR A&ASHLEY K MEHBOD 2625 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 42 0004 J A WALKER&S S WALKER 2685 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 JAMES A&SHARON S WALKER 2685 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 42 • WHISLER S S J M &S S WHISLER 2683 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 JAMES M WHISLER SANDRA S WHISLER 2683 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 • Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. • Date Application Received: 05/18/2022 O�j Date Application Considered as Complete:05/18/2022 SLOA/ YO60-Day Review Period Expires: 07/17/2022 •••• To: Chair McCutcheon and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator G. From: Melanie Curtis, Planner WOG Date: 21 June 2022 Subject: #LA22-000029,John Peterson, 2880 Fox Street Variance Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a variance to permit construction of a pole building that will exceed the height of the existing one-story home. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends denial of the application because practical difficulty hasn't been established to support the variance for accessory building height. Background • The property owner applied for a building permit to construct a 40'x 24' pole building on their 3.17 acre property with a proposed peak height of approximately 17 feet (defined height±15 feet).The sidewall height is 12.5 feet. The existing home is a one-story walkout rambler with a peak height of approximately 16 feet, a sidewall height of approximately 9 feet, and defined height is estimated to be 12 feet. City Code states that maximum building height for all buildings is 30-feet(defined height), and further stipulates that accessory buildings not exceed the height of the principal building(home). Due to the accessory building limitation,the applicant's permit was denied.The applicant revised the plan in an attempt to reduce the overall height of the pole building but reducing the height significantly reduces the building's functionality for its planned use. As a result,they have applied for a height variance from City Code Section 78-420. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information:The applicant has identified the limiting height of the existing home on the property and the impracticability of the restriction which is based on the existing home as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance.Additionally,they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds the existing home to be the limiting factor for approval. • FILE#LA22-000029 21 June 2022 Page 2 of 4 LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET 4111 Section 78-420—Accessory Building Setbacks (<1,000 s.f.): RR-1B Required Proposed Front 50' ±135' Rear 15' +100' East Side 15' +100' West Side 15' 20' Section 78-420—Lot Area/Width: RR-1B Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200' Actual 138,004 s.f. (3.17 acre) 430' Section 78-1403—Structural Building Coverage: The property exceeds 1.99 acres,therefore structural coverage limits do not apply. Section 78-420—Building Height= Maximum 30 feet defined height; accessory buildings may not exceed height of principal building: Peak Height Defined Height Principal Building ±16 ±12 Proposed Pole Building 17.3' 15' • Applicable Regulations: Height Variance(Code Section 78-420) The City Code requires accessory buildings to not exceed the height of the home on a property. For a property with a single story home, or rambler-style home it would not allow a traditional barn or rural pole barn-type of building with taller side walls.The applicant's proposed building will be well below the permitted 30-foot defined height limitation, however is limited by the height of the home. The proposed building will be located to the rear of the home, and will be set on grade that is approximately 10-feet lower than the front of the home.The proposed pole building is less than 1,000 square feet and is proposed in a permitted location. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06,subd. 14,when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter • FILE#LA22-000029 21 June 2022 Page 3 of 4 ifor property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance.The applicant is proposing to construct a pole building for a residential accessory use on a residentially zoned property which is consistent with the intent of the ordinance. The intent of the regulation is,in part,to reinforce the accessory nature of the accessory buildings; allowing a larger(square foot and/or mass) building blurs that objective. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan.The variances resulting in a permit for a pole building in a rural residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The applicant is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner with the construction of an accessory building. Reasonable use of the property is afforded with the residential building on the property. Further,accessory buildings, including oversized accessory building,are permitted on the property,with the stipulation that they be no higher than the principal building. The height restriction relating to the principal building applied to this property results in limited options to construct a functional conforming height building. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; the existing home on the property is the limiting factor and was not constructed by the • current owner; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality.The proposed height and location of the pole building are consistent with the character of the neighborhood which is not likely to be altered by construction of the pole building. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable,as an accessory building is an allowed use in the RR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.The height of the home on the property is lower than many of the adjacent or neighboring homes on Fox Street,and is unique to the property. Many of the neighboring properties have accessory buildings which are equal to or taller than the proposed which may support the requested variance. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the • land is located.The limiting height of the home on the property is lower than many of the adjacent or neighboring homes on Fox Street, and is unique to the property. FILE#LA22-000029 21 June 2022 Page 4 of 4 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a i substantial property right of the applicant.The owner has indicated that the variance is necessary for the usability of the building and preservation of their property rights. However,although the property owner has a right to accessory buildings,the right does not necessarily extend to those that are designed to be taller than the home. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting of the requested variance would not impair health,safety,comfort or morals and would be in keeping with the intent of the zoning code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.A variance for an accessory structure is almost, by definition,a convenience issue as the use of the property is established by the single family home. The relatively low height of the home on the property restricts options for accessory buildings.The home's age and height are unique for the immediate neighborhood. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances.Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration • 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation As proposed the pole building appears to exceed the peak height of the existing home by approximately one foot(defined height exceeded by approximately 3 feet). Planning Staff recommends denial of the application. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Proposed Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Photos—Aerial +Street View Exhibit F. Property Owners List Exhibit G. Plat Map • 5/24/22, 1:20 PM Permit List I Citizenserve PC Exhibit A Land Use Application Summary • Application Date: 05/18/2022 Address: 2880 Fox ST Orono, MN 55356 Parcel Number: 0411723310011 Land Use Number: LA22-000029 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: YANFEI HANG&JOHN PE PERSON Address: 2880 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 Applicant: Name: John Peterson Company: Address: 2880 Fox ST Long Lake, MN 55356 pete2271@gmail.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: John Peterson pete2271@gmail.com Associated Contact: • Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Pole Barn Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Applicationsal Applicant Signature: https://www7.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder ID=85471555&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true 1/1 5/24/22, 1:21 PM Permit List I Citizenserve PC Exhibit B PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA22-000029 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: I plan to use the pole barn as a personal woodshop, which is expressly permitted by the zoning. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The key issue is the way that 'defined height' is calculated in the case of my home. The rambler is built into the side of a hill such that it is one story as viewed from the South side, but two stories as viewed from the North side. However, due to the peculiar way that defined height is calculated, this does not increase the defined height resulting value from that measured from the North side, estimated at 16 feet. This results in a very low limit in height for the pole barn. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: This pole barn will not loom over the primary structure. It will appear lower than the home bya significant margin. It will look no different than anyother pole barn common in the area. 9 9 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. • Response: No economic considerations are present. Money is not the issue. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116106, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: Trying to build a pole barn as a personal woodshop. Woodshops typically have overhead apparatus, such as lighting, dust collection duct work, air filters, etc. If I am limited to a 16 foot defined height on the structure it is very difficult to build a pole barn with a ceiling height enough to accommodate this. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: This point is not applicable to this situation, the pole barn is an accessory building less than 1000 sq feet that will conform to all zoning requirements, and needs a variance only on 'defined height'. 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: Not applicable, this is not a dwelling unit. https://www7.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=85471555&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true 1/2 5/24/22, 1:21 PM Permit List I Citizenserve 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. • Response: The peculiar point regards the state of the primary structure and the way that 'defined' height' is calculate which in this case results in a low limit of 16 ft. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: Most/many homes in the area are far taller than mine, they would be able to build pole barns up to 30 feet high in many cases, without issue. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: I want to build a reasonable and normal pole barn suitable for a personal woodshop. This is necessary to my enjoyment of my home and residence. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: It will be a professionally constructed pole barn by Structural Buildings, which exceeds the typical engineering requirements for an accessory building. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant • but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: The defined height in this case prevents the construction of a pole barn with an interior height adequate for its intended purpose. • https://www7.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=85471555&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true 2/2 lip k- J. PC Exhibit C ' 5 66'57'51"E w— / I 23 0 1 r- O 1 4. 1 hm i a I Z I >,I • 0I 1P0.0 I a4 Et o N-22204-W --1 21.0 F- 1 I .060 a0.0 a m () I C �27.a Cn� ��yy�I 51it orale 1--AY 20.0 r ! sd.�__—.-I ���.\ £x. Dwelling Ni Spfic Fed ' 1 _. ate _.... se.r.._._.._ •We//Hem?' P. ' _w 0 I r.._T a '4.' r • a; soon leo a,w.wewoz� -..;;:;6.....;: 7,157.--, __� — _1 I 5 F ox C.)t re • • PC COLOR SCHEDULE R SHEET STEEL TRIMS Exhibit D S I LOCATION COLOR LOCATION COLOR JOB NAME: PETERSON. JOHN 5o ROOF SMOKE GRAY (EE CAP SMOKE GRAY U- r W SAVE WALL` ROMAN BLUE GABLE TRH KESTREL WTE ADDRESS: 2880 FOX STREET JOB S:32039 Z S! GABLE MILS ROMAN BUE SAVE TRH KESTREL RETE SOFFIT KESTREL WHITE CURLER Iran ROMAN a,= LONG LAKE .MN 55356 If) 7 WAINSCOT SMOKE GRAY RABL9COT CORNER SMOKE GRAY PHONE 5; @-384-7160 SALES REP.:NOAH Z UPPER SHEATHING NA WAINSCOT TRANSITION ROMAN BLUE Q BASE TRIM SMOKE GRAY CUSTOMER SIGNATURE: SHEET STEEL INTERIOR/ fa GEM,LINER KESTREL NTE WIDOW AND DOOR HMS WALL LINER NA SERVICE DOOR TRRI KESTREL RETE J INCOT LINER NA OID TRIM KESTREL NTE DRAWING HISTORY Q 0 NSOL 0 2 PORCH CELNG NA ENDOW TRIM KESTREL RIVE REV.i DATE NOTES SIGNATURE I F M ELSER TRACK COVER M - I—r RUDER SLICER TRIM NA - CONTRACT - - VERSETTA STONE NA DER DOOR PANEL M A - ..SLgi BOLLARD COVERS M CUPOLA ROLLS NA MISCELLANEOUS A - CIPOIA ROOF M ROOF VENT TRH M A - 0- WEATHER VANE NA POST/BUM(RAP NA A - 0 SHEET INDEX GENERAL NOTES = �aNWy Q (/11.4 T TITLE SIFT L THE PLANS AND SPECS AS OUTLINED ARE BASED ON TIE D!SIFNANLD PROCESS OP Z •OUTLINED 55-I FLOOR MMI STRUCTURAL BUDDING.THE SIECORTRACTORS HIRED ST STRUCTURAL NN IGA AND THE O. - 56-3 ELEVATIONS STRUCTURAL SLIMING,SALES REPRESENTATIVE,R IS TIE BEEF OP STRUCTURAL DI SS-D SECTIONS SIDINGS AND THE CUSTOMER THAT THESE PLANS ARE ACCURATE DC IS-1 SCHEDULES 2.WHERE LACK OF NPORMATKNL OR AM DISCREPANCY SHOULD APPEAR N THE CO Ot CO DC DRARNGS OR SPICRIUTIONS.SETTEE INTERPRETATION FROM STRUCTURAL BISDMGS J = MHT BE RECEIVED BEFORE PROCEEDING NRH THAT PORTION OP WORK. < 0 LD 3.NO CHANGES.MODRYATTON OR DEVIATIONS SHALL BE MADE PROM THE PLANS AND H SPECS WITHOUT WRITTEN PIRMISSION PROM STRUCTURAL BUI DINGS. _ gl I.1 1.ANT CONTRADICTIONS N THE PLANS.SPr.%OR APPUCASLE SULpNG CODES MCT BE = 0 BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF STRUCTURAL SLLOMGS PRIOR TO RORK BEND PERFORMED.N THE EVENT Of A CONTRADICTION.TIE SUBCONTRACTOR MAY BE _5 \ REQUIRED TO PERFORM TIE MORE STRINGENT AT NO ADDITIONAL COST.THC DECISION rt1 RELES SOLELY ON STRUCTIRAL BIEDI GS = S.ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL TAKE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT THE PISLC AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES FROM DAMAGE {Y F I SUBCONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CUTTING/PATCHING OP NECESSARY IU < PENETRATIONS TO INCLUDE SHE!TROCK.STEEL.POLY AND CONCRETE. IL C) t SIECONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE ORGAIRING AID DALY CLEAN IP. D_ N L SUBLD CONTRACTORS SHALL PROVDI STRUCTURAL MIMING,NIH OPERATION MAMLALS Q W AND SHOP DRARNGS AS REQUESTED. W ): < 1.UNLESS SPECRALLY NOTED THE PLANS.WISDOM AND DOOR LOCATIONS SMALL BE F ES Q CN ALLOWED LEEWAY FOR SIDING AND TREES TO BE BEST APPLIED. f- x p a IOUNLESS OTHERNY STATED.THE FINAL GRADING.INUIDING NECESSARY IMPORT OR 7 EXPORT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OP THE CUSTOMER. P03[�60i iDi i 16357 0 DC o UJ L STRUCTURAL OTHEREADDRESS AND PROJECT SPECIFIC AND CAN NOT BE USEDST FOR ❑(©-9 ©O©L3 FOR I AMYENGINEER RPROJECT OR ADDRESS UNLESS WRITTEN PERMISSION C FRONDED BY SHEET Q04 POW 60Q©4WNIES'000 ORIGINAL exGINEER of RECORD. • T-1 • 0 1 1 40'-0. r e Li. r-ioh. ,,, No. No. 6.<, e-o• le-io)>. --V I I 1 12"BOXED EAVE' 1 , 0 . ,—. , . - , u ---, D) , ,,,, , ,UM 1 i UM I i Bll/ yung i WI Tiffr, •s_, sr, .1, 1 , [ ? SAW kultoTariffa ...2X4 CORNER BRACES co in YPICAL 1 CORNERS .... . —I 11001 8_ CES \ TYPICAL CORNERS...., _-.... I— U Al TTYTTOTREll ‘N, ff V• ; \ cr) \\ 12, la 0 t? '' RIDGE CAP I PROFILE VENT % < m Fii 0 O a co 114 o 1110 , . 2 .3 Zi tO g 0 rig 1-•—•- ii: F RCf3'. Wedlvtrair---7 . < 0 • • 111 CX - ul(-1 ol OL V) 111 Lil -I = t)b < 0 <,.... u_ — I- ? a< , E O N , • 0 ,- r --- ,-• 0 ,-. e-N N. ffili ® 'im i ....., ,_, •_, Ce I- LLI < set 1 - _ < 3-U, 9.-0. , 3.- 0. , IT BOXED EAVE w- 3-0 v-IoN• N. r-o• e-cr , e-o• , r-cr , C-o• 3-404. , al a. o ,....1 , • —, _JLLi >: <- 1-- al CI CoPairriroop MP I= z 4 I 3.-0. I T-0. 'i FLOOR PLAN PREILORIIMMV a 012-11E-gONN 0 DL uJ SCALE:V1r-r-o• MOT POO IgClIMINIIMIIKVIIMI -. 0 DZ SHEET SB—I • • MY WWW LW0WTW0gTI©0 55 • 12 U PRE-FINISHED _ X < METAL ROOF PANEL ' 17 0 PRE-FINISHED tr IT � METAL WALL PANEL PRE-FINISHED METAL WALL PANEL 30 a �� Q Ri 1:4 Ut? I!1 - HES STEEL WAINSCOT �p ------* STEEL OT • FRONT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION SCALE 3/1E -0' SCALE 3K-I-0' 2 0 O 2 a °H OWC z N DL PRE-PMISHED Ni W METAL ROOF PANEL -I r 0 N 1- -N IT 12' IT IT Z r V io 0— O. Kt PRE-FINISHED N METAL WALL PANEL D N MPETAL WALL PANEL I- LLS stW d < W • W (- STEEL WAINSCOT STEEL WAINSCOT I- to 0 I = M f0 < > 0 DC w LEFT ELEVATION BACK ELEVATION SHEET SCALE 3/11'4-0' SCALE 3/16'-1-0' S B-2 0 0 /TRIES TO POOR 5 DO•RDGE CAP` V _ V T P. Roof STEEL, y, 10.5-•�� ''> ._g,,. ,I n z D 1 E ECAP I PROPLE VENT V T I DORN PEAK PWM PEAK PLR. --I EAT.TOP BRIM TO RIDGE CAP BOTH BITTED TOP Of ROOf STEEL ROOF PANEL 0.41 T ELEV:FT- to OXI L°no FLAT Oc ELT/.0 R 20'RIDGE CAP ri5h1pH ?pp .J MEDAK ROOF HEIGHT I VI TO T'S1EP1 OVERHANG /��R 3 <I- �V:6-1 XX' pT XX'ABOVE GRADE LEVEL) `/ EXPORT 1 ��E�O BLOM 1151.1gN TTRRppyyl�pApCIX(pGy�_y..y =at p ON GTVJK PER rRIL10 MIP. TRIl4 HEFT I 3 ~f.L BEE DETAL -i- M I- TRE.55 BEARMG e: %/ ���������� i�ai ROOF STEEL _/ S w ELEV R-.• I _ _ '-P{HAMIa L L E3 SQL I TAPE El EU JXl LAMINATED COL ix VAT .�� �� PORT Tial17 501TR PANELS II ,, Npp ppgL . AESRY/FP OVER DU WL fE[IS 50I-FIT BTARIIR I 5'-'GRK TYREIO 0 TM Sam SUPPORT O 9 rtti 1011 STEEL MIL PATEl O IT BOXED EAVE 74. 0 TRANSITION TRFI § = Q X NAEISCOT EAKSOOT TRAITOR A I CIO.' x IELVI KTl� TVI Z Mil f W AOfI GRADE) CONCRETE f W FROM BOTTOM OF GRADE BRD N IX ELEV.co., \ Q 1IV VAPOR V PERSfftER DLYLATOM DO S f OP FROMTED GRADE/ 1� a 0 TOP OF SLAB h 7)m b TREATED GRADE BOARO GRADE I7 FearmERmRaler .mnL:I Imm:I 0 F m.ID TREATED GRADE BOARD III—III—I�Ii11=111 Z NuELM Xf-IF _} _ O BASE DETAIL 0 n RGD MSLLATON M DORM 9 -0014 dR DU TREATED ANCHOR BLOLXB�S: '-i O \ SEE DETALO Cl) Lij BOTTOM OF FOOTNG 7EX 41117-711116,—da. .... EIEV•Srr 111-1116 F O SEE FLOOR PIAN FOR FOOTMG SUE I LOCATION —D`..III. O WALL SECTION JIL=JIL III—III= ll L l. s SCALE:V4'•r-o• I=IID= =.111 ° a LI 1'MATED ANCHOR..S:. lI-111; 1 711=111. La a III=171L—in=111.-1II= 0- F- o SEE FLOOR PLAN FOR FOOTING f=1R- ... 11III I SUE I LDUTION .IIIn.. =III= F 3 Y = _ = = m a > Ofac til FRgIbO000G9 121? FF FOOTING DETAIL ' CI IX RE-9g1-§0§E a SHEET A04 POA 613MITAIMICTOCIMI SB-3 • • DOOR SCHEDULE LABEL OTT. MFG/MODEL SUE ROUGH OPEN SLAB MAT. FRAME MAT. COLOR SONG HARDWARE REMARKS �_j�j Q I HAAS l0 103 W-0 X W-0' STEEL WOOD WHITE - - HUH OFT U/SIDE MOUNT OPENER MODEL.1501C 5 0 I PLYCO n SOY 10-VT X 82-VT STEEL STEEL WHITE L115 DB.U. 1-1/12 HARDWARE U w x =KLL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ In Z_ WINDOW SCHEDULE 0 LABEL OTT. MPG/MODEL SUE ROUGH OPEN MATERIAL JAMB FINISH COLOR REMARKS J 2 VECTOR GLIDER /WXSL 4S-VT X SL-VP VINYL - WHITE - 1n ® _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ reF ROOM SCHEDULE U 6- Pc` ROOM s ROOM NAME FLOOR BASE WALLS CEILING CEILING HT REMARKS =EddW I .g SHOP CONCRETE NONE NONE STEEL 17-C - W ® _ _ - _ _ - _ LI)) m ® _ _ _ _ _ _ 0 • _ RAKE TRIM 206 PURLINS FLAT O 2X6 FASCIA BRD — V Z < A �TRISS TOP CHORD oe p• POST TRIM _ _ tr/ IX SOLID SOFFIT PANEL + z U1 U1 3 Q O I— F—CHANNEL Z n U =O O— 01 -a el I.INSTALL 08 PU LDIS PER SPECS(SEE 01ART FCR DIN l•) 2.ATTACII 255 FASCIA BOARD TO END CF PLEUNS 1\Il IMPLY STRNdST N 2-15O RS PER CCNNECTICN) 0 a TAG%F-dANNEL 10 r it MiN 1-1 1.sny is B A TO W EALd 10P LETfLL M1M PANELS ,EE OF fSOA) NA OL I- A INSTALL PRECUT SOFFIT PANELS NTH JP NAWS \ 12" 10 1/2" ILIr < S TACO TTN OF POST TRY W/1-1/1•SHIN=NAILS 1g" 16 1/2" WJ— (APPLY SALVO 10 SOFFIT PwOS) Q N W.I TALL BANE ATI 24" 22 1/2'• Q LLJ �wd vatTlcw ANo 3/T OUT and ue FASCIA) F B" 36" 34 1/2" BOXED GABLE 4B" 46 1/2" ~ m CI PEgLOUilDEA V w < > 0©-92-QO©© o o X 1:11:4 POW 6S1M4WN1640SGL SHEET SB-9 • • PC Exhibit E 1-7- 1/20 --, ,...•----....-----'. ' • • . Ar• s: • :*. , , 20•• • •t„,,.. gb,,, ' t ••• --• -_ ' ' •• . _ t6V., ‘ \ , . ' _ .. • , .4s. •-s. - - --• -....-.. :;,,,, - *4 N. ',.-No, . , _ , ,,......,•:',:- - ' -mlibrom,.. '..``' ,• ,-.ii%,..,„, t - Nittits44‘. ,..N414t ,,. , ijf,,,----- , •:-.:,,_ „,....7_ ,,,, arn't ;,,,.,,:- 'V . : . 1 r -1/4..--,. ..- ,.. ...„.. Ns,- Allik.. .. 40viii - %4t4•;*' i . . ----...A., - -. ' ••..."*-, "AC • ,,:-‘• ., . I ...alm...... . . •.1.,.., - •••• '1 "*"...-.91141t ' -• --- - i.`4, ..bib,. -'.'`,-1 , _ ,;.,-,-,-...,, t, . . . -, .... , ..10.... „ ' . / N - : \ ,If 4444444014 '`••,(,., , . • es'9 t e't 's' ...Ate •41, 44C40.." • 1 ' -34`...41041,111/0.' :*•141/214 • V t' 1 ' .- Lt. , -.7 -.e,/-1:,,,..;-7"- -4, - ‘* "'':-,-„.;;:-•jelr''''„I li .„' . •,e • ' 'III . 1 i , .., '...-., - 4,, . • - ,.......-- . --- . - \ ,t "t ,,_L• ' '-iA,„.1. -',-... , ...... -- 1134tAr. 'N',, " '`: -.-- .,,.-- , sr- ' ,•-‘,. - -------- .. *-- "I'. ,;,1 y, ,4 i , ,14. \ / 4:\ , ,,J;....e.,:''r.c •••• •,;-4,4t.t.\ ,.4. .' '•p., ' • 4 40, 4, •.s kr. 1 1 ' .4-wi'lifitiv. '11;--72::?0,‘.'1:-'1,- ,,,,e. , .A -, ,kAi.„141.....,,,,,,,41,,mc„...r .. , .,,_i, ,. in ow -, , ,, -, i - , , ff A '41.1411 Mimi . -;iimimr. _ • .• ioad II ilkiji kit • .. • -'444 _ -- _ . -• - . ••.7•..,,i,v., :,, • •7. ... ---_ .. . L-- vil'air-gie - ,430405:-• _. _ • -,..... -• Street view facing North (existing shed on left/west to be removed) • 0 . 1.,,,4 .4 ,,,i, :.,0 24.. i ' .- .,,Y,- ' A:\ \ "1r :pftiti i ,. ....„,t ..-1. ., r * ,, ./ -1 y rid, i - i • �4 �i 4.7: . , , • .:., ,,..‘ ,. . ,,,..:40,. : i .i \-;,:‘, t . . 1 i., .....: • , ..„ , -,___ ..._,-, ,, . ,, 0;. ., \.. tr. t. .... ..,„,__-_- „,,,, ,.. ,. L. ., ' ' .\A ' 'i. I ; '1‘ I " -A - 4,4. 0,- • ''. '. , 1 '. '''''7''''\ .> o:le Alk,. ::A.,,,val':-.. ..J , ; _.;, ,,,, .,,,..' , ,.. _,---__ ::,,,,,., 1 4 A-4114..-4,. a f t „-. _ y . ,, ,...„ . ' ! Z ' ! , k .„44,,,,iiiiitAtio , . .......„ , .,. . .411Zoomed in street view facing North (existing shed on left/west to be removed) 2 0 • • r, 'Wit'. .,— 'sT r w • ?• ..'.r .,, °� ' Contours shown * 4341( 4,14Z, '7'1E. 4 . . 4 , . : . . TAr. 4 .t,:,/4!. — .1.....— .. - .1-i ",,k,. • - ,,.:, .*:.il diit. ' • fit - r , i `''' . i9 `1. " )*'~ F . , f - *,'"t4, .565 "'. -- ' 41 A r ,� ,;*".- -A04,., .., .. .4y s f �'#1 � `,...,..„. .. , a.,..ti k41,, - ,.a.„,: ,,,ii. '. -- Oft. Ili /,:i',,,,,..:„„.-..".„ ',' 1 ""•-** , ..^ ,. ';,,,,,,,.y. ,v/.4;„ .p, "t.„‘ " fr, ,:.i f, __,... 4. .-. • I :<F h 9' ` 'k . Y..• .4 7-- .. -, . Kms.a i• ' .fit .q .�, ,llt," . o�{{{`���• - _ `.1: i w` . . P`•. " ", 0. 5,.'.40 i ' \ . , ! � S s '` / %' , cx \ \ *� �r Vit *\ h`Y, ' 1 ti - ' . '; . ...... ilirVIrlirAilliiiipla -''' 3 S 0 {U ` .i.i i ' Y{ *\ i►6.� illlii. -- .:. i,, 41 '� ,� ,.•. ' 4. 4 f �_,,,:f t p '.• W ,p may :. r ..ti .. ,,jos - 'e f " y^y r' -0 ° d max.-at,� s ' 1 �x '�p+.t• �'� E ajjjl r t � it.. .ftp, }�,.i k. t.A •its.fir '. < y(r:t °' 4�;a, ..,,,,.,„ . --,- .•,1,,, ., .' ' ii -,....A..t, :,,. '-- .-: i.,..:.-..... . 443 . . -f... ko—it Iii Hennepin County aerial 4 0 • r a ,.,41,,,,.' ,,, {{,`p 2022 oblique photo ...i...--,t4ii* ..--.4`- 4.'4,...,4.._!.-r• ,r. •., °. Iii..- • : ...", ..02.4-'...'... .. .., „ , •••••.. -.... 7 - . ' "-`-,-,1444" ' 4i.u„ a IXZP 4 - ,4 ,.,,,,-c.:.:,,,,.*.. , , " 7. , $ a X1 � 1 , '''''',.,i,ti, ` ' 5R t 7� ' Iti , f y i'i41a Vit . ; f �' S �itlo �Y•. • A � !,44-4"-- ,l��r ^ y.. • 1 ''' i 44 3 `� t w i r A 5 • • •: ae+.`,t,e, r. tY 1 y, i ->,F4 , yam" e' �s, x a :, I s '•...°« r: • ' zf .44 1c ,;t p ` 'co.:* a . d w � ;ice'" K' " °`EaF a, +P .4F • .+; .ri J� ?� s :".41([4,74....,,„,„.2.=046fr.*: 1:::" •. 565 ,::::" r' '4.''°q.,..,,r,.., . . ,,,,..„ .0, ifif..,r, . , '-..,- ,. Atookook. , • 4i 411. • ft ' i ¢' 1 ,,:A•• ' A, • r� t Yt Y4. • - 44., : : _I__-7- _ `f .S ter,,..: I- €,; a Fox St _ -----_- F.ox4St �.. _ '' , _ '� < Tue May 3 2022 6 d� — � t ' • PC Exhibit F 38 04-117-23 31 0002 38 04-117-23 31 0020 38 04-117-23 42 0030 MELISSA A HEMMEKE JO-ANNE BEIMERS GEORGE FUNK/JUDY ROGOSHESKE 435 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S THOMAS BEIMERS 540 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD W • LONG LAKE MN 55356 2990 SUSSEX RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 31 0003 38 04-117-23 31 0021 38 04-117-23 43 0002 DAVID&MONA HARMANN LISA A KRO YVES D ROUX 505 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S CARTER L ANDERSON 2765 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 2980 SUSSEX RD WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55356 38 04-117-23 31 0004 38 04-117-23 34 0004 38 04-117-23 43 0011 DAREN&JENNIFER ODDENINO RICHARD T NOLAND MINNETONKA ALANO SOCIETY 535 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S 2801 FOX ST 2760 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 31 0006 38 04117-23 34 0005 DOUGLAS&JANE RASMUSON DOUGLAS R SWANSON 585 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S ANGELA A SWANSON LONG LAKE MN 55356 2820 FARVIEW LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 31 0010 38 04-117-23 34 0006 BRUCE LEMKE AURELIE HYMEN 565 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S MATTHIEU HYMEN LONG LAKE MN 55356 2800 FARVIEW LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 • 38 04-117-23 31 0011 38 04-117-23 34 0007 YANFEI HANG&JOHN PETERSON MICHAEL R&BERIT K FRANCIS 2880 FOX ST 16030 VENTURA BLVD#380 LONG LAKE MN 55356 ENCINO CA 91436 38 04117-23 31 0012 38 04-117-23 34 0011 ANDREW SUKOW&RACHEL SUKOW ELIZABETH ROLFZEN 460 SUSSEX LA RUSSELL ROLFZEN LONG LAKE MN 55356 3090 FARVIEW LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 31 0017 38 04-117-23 42 0005 JAMES COSTA&SHAHNAZ COSTA MELISSA JILL MUNSCH 2940 FOX ST 1001 WILDHURST TRAIL ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55364 38 04-117-23 31 0018 38 04-117-23 42 0006 CHAD R ABRAHAM MINNETONKA ALANO GROUP 2920 FOX ST 2760 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 31 0019 38 04-117-23 42 0029 • JAMES COSTA&SHAHNAZ COSTA BRIAN&KATIE MERZ 2940 FOX ST 500 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD S ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 G D PC Hennepin ;' :. \\I\ Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Exhibit • Date: 5/19/2022 �c+.� �� (ilk f`.It it, 'L) Ir e . 4 —_, , 5: . . _....... H { -- 1 I ti I Fox,St fie ft a- 0 0 L v � IC ar4le►yt1n2++" .. sRarncy,F{d HEtNNEPIN ar Buffer Size: 500 0 100 200 400 Feet Map Comments: I iii I t I I I 2880 Fox St This data O is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (i)is furnished with no warranty of any khd; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying • purposes.Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from the data. For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55487/gis.info@hennepin.us • €1, To: Chair McCutcheon and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator yFrom: Laura Oakden, Interim Community DevelopmentkESHO ` Director Date: June 21, 2022 Subject: #LA22-000027,Amy Swanson,4025 4025 Watertown Rd, Sketch Plan Application Summary: The applicant is requesting sketch plan review on a proposed subdivision that would subdivide a parcel into a front lot/back lot subdivision. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff requests non-binding feedback from the planning commission. Planning Staff does not support the lot split as non-conforming lots would be created, inconsistent with the zoning code and the comprehensive plan for the area. Background The property is unplatted and roughly 13.07 total acres and roughly 270'wide at Watertown Road based on Hennepin County information.The property is in the RR-1A zoning district which • requires 5 acres and 300' of lot width. The current property is substandard to the district due to the lot width.The area is served by well and septic. There is also potential wetlands on the property per Hennepin county maps. In areas not served by sanitary sewer, each lot much contain 2 acres f dry contagious buildable land. Any wetland areas are not counted toward the required dry-buildable acres for the creation of new lots. As this is a sketch plan, No wetland delineation has been completed on the property, nor have two septic sites for each lot been verified. Application The applicant is looking for feedback on the proposed application. The applicant's propose to split the current parcel with an existing home into a front lot and a back lot. The front lot would front on Watertown Rd. Lot width is measured at the front building setback line. The back lot would have street access from a shared driveway established in an outlot. The back lot is required to meet 150% lot area standards which would require 7.5 acres. Each lot would have its own septic and well.The proposed use of the property is anticipated to be single family residential. The table below summarizes the proposed lot area and width, and shows the required standards, including setbacks. Items in red denote non-conforming standards. Area (5 Acre Lot Width (300' Meets Required) Required) Requirements Existing Lot 13.07 270' No • Proposed Front Lot 3.65 240' No FILE#LA22-000027 June 21,2022 Page 2 of 2 Proposed Back Lot (150%Area) 9.41 (7.5 Acres) N/A Yes • Outlot N/A 30' Yes Applicable Regulations: Section 78-395 outlines the development standards for the RR-1A zoning district. Section 82-85 outlines the purpose and process for sketch plans. Analysis: The proposal is not consistent with the zoning code or the Comprehensive Plan. The current zoning, RR-1A, requires 5 acres of dry buildable land area, and 300 feet of frontage. The community management plan has this area designated as rural, which guides 1 unit for 5 acres, consistent with the current zoning. The applicant's proposal to create a substandard front lot that would require lot area and lot width variances.The applicant must prove practical difficulties for the required variances,which appear to be self-imposed. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff does not support the subdivision as proposed. • List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application and Narrative Exhibit B. Existing Lot and Proposed sketch plan Exhibit C. Information Maps Letter View PC Exhibit A LA22-000027 Land Use Application Summary opplication Date: 05/17/2022 Address: 4025 Watertown RD Orono, MN 55359 Parcel Number: 3111823410012 Land Use Number: LA22-000027 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: BRIAN SWANSON&AMY SWANSON Address: 4025 WATERTOWN RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 Applicant: Name: Amy Swanson Company: Address: 4025 Watertown Road Orono, MN 55359 amyeswanson33@gmail.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: • Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Property Subdivision Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application 0 Conditional Use Permit 0 Site Plan Application El Subdivision Application 0 Subdivision Exception 0 Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: /+ file:///ci.orono.mn.us/...%20(4025%20Watertown%20Rd)%20SUB-sketch%20plan/Land%20Use%20Application%20Summary%20(18).htm[6/16/2022 1:09:04 PM] To whom it may concern, We are Brian and Amy Swanson. We moved to 4025 Watertown Road in January 2021 with our four kids. We are inquiring about subdividing our property to create a separate buildable lot. Our property is 13+acres and we are proposing to subdivide the front acreage. There is a creek that would serve as a natural divider of the two proposed lots. We understand that our property does not meet all of the criteria listed according to Orono planning code, however, we are asking that you consider our property and its ability to support two lots. After our meeting with the planning committee, we were told of three requirements that our property does not meet. 1. Code requires 300 feet of property along the road. Our property has 270 feet of road front, which we cannot change. 2. Because of the layout of the property, we would be asking for an easement on the driveway 3. Code requires a minimum of 5 acres for subdividing a buildable lot. We are proposing approximately 4.1 acres, but after the easement on the driveway there would be approximately 3.65 acres remaining. (The driveway would be expanded to 30 feet wide for approximately 675 feet) • **We have scheduled to have a septic company come to our property and determine two suitable septic locations that fall within our proposed lot lines, but the two times they have come out, the weather did not allow for them to do their work. We were encouraged to submit a rough proposal of the property explaining some of its nuances and noting that before we obtain official documents and reports (ie. survey, wetland delineation, Minnehaha Creek Watershed district approval..etc) we would first propose our plan to you to determine if you will be willing to work with us before being too financially invested in the process. Thanks for your time. We look forward to meeting with you soon! Brian and Amy Swanson • • Interactive 4025 Watertown Road,Orono PC Exhibit 13 Maps LA22-000027 ,e.4$1 : • . r„.,an adYety�r a4�Mk+N in (PID) Searh heW Property © S �fi' , }i,� --• '0' i. - r•gler*,,s, k•.a,.g7 ,3 eGotoPropertylinks _y r^xa 4.ii. • • a{•' " .r! 1. .r-.y (+.y. Clear results ,.1`Y# Yt*,�C' r�i 3Jr,5ir. ,2t a 1 J 4 f�a'" ! x 'Y 'i`.,':-� t.-:"4,4::1r b PID:3111823410012 It... =cam 'IP b i**fp''. t . : .e ;r I.'~?F .44,-"> sl e a _* '-...,..c-.,.„..,;_, � 4025 Watertown Rd 71:+te ak"� t y t ��`" � ` Cr:rill �,. ' ,,,i.....„-.,. ..r Orono,MN 55359 + r +Ys v.1� til ;: 'y.,- # t >ri't, 4 • R .,,•^ � y+ Ay.,,,,,','!,-.. ....* �,,, '"'s1 * Ownerrraxpayer y ,,r,:, t , ''d,•r r -'Y". w,t'� �_�'S jar4�• ( ie �'f�sir a , rv^ '��� ;:> Owner Brian Swanson&Amy Swanson FI -! `) r I 1�'� 3"ti . ^ ro i} , '94— . r*'1—'41'— . tea' . BRIAN SNANSON&AMY SWANSON � if' �c- `u • " !" .1(:.,.‹...;,,,,,%-„,,,,,, �'r''( •).� atm t €• Taxpoyer 4025 SkVAN OWN RD a t�l .. ale s'�,,L� � 4 •�2. '.'4-4, Y`,,f:A 7 A '. � L, y4.$5 � - � s.r e MAPLE FLAW MN 55355 t- t, , A ,+fir y 4. ;tyya t 1 EParoel '�`t` 7 4„, '1� f {i.773 1F'fT ' t ., r w ,r t�} ..4 ' . 1307 acres 1 • we r `41 r• w;. t' • +,':r p+, .4 �, '� w L • y . fir' Parcel lver 569.255 sq fl ,../ '�' ..t'• ' •y y • -r „,,--.....4,, a Torrens.Abstract: Abstract S �'- y r” t at..., ..y��� ; • 'h„, f�!" ,�`; � � R`ti iko. i �` ill Unpladed 31 118 23 s - "" A y l .y • �7 ........ Beg At The Intersection.Of Sy Line Or t X y.. r3. -.y\, _ r iii ,,.,: .;,.k . .. . , . • Watertown Rd With E Lme Of Se 1%4Th `? Metes 8 N,Iy Along Said SN Line To its r s _ ``� �Y v 3,t . .. t Bounds Intersection.1fith E Line Of W 20 kr'..`'..- ' o { • „e a, x Note:This Is A Partial MetesB � g •-:'r6 �p +�;* Bounds Description. • x t 1 I _ V t t r • Mt; _ :''.2t Para ite 20221 .... ` _ ...� fri,J,4 aZ ' , Market Value. 5695 000 3 : f w •.ii • e �: 4 Total Tax. $7.925.82 "*- s 3�s • 77 s1 �`.�„ Property Type Residential `, y ;., rkr jam. .r t 7?wr« • •i . s. Homestead. Homestead • 4' r Year Built 1978 ' , �. ,tea`. _ le `, Market Value: 5782.000 \,. ,*2 Property Type Residential ' - .j Homestead. Homestead f ' Ysur 8e 1918 _ -- - - -• , Salusw - M. • i , Property © Measure e Go to Property bnks ,• I f � * @: r'.I I Feet- �� i ) {rF �"'�:w..,�i. `i - �' Measurement Result Clear results J� --,%••.• 1 / s k - • 270.3 Fria PID:3111823410012 '.Q " !'� '•,ct. ` 4025 Watertown Rd _. _y-rwA _:,.- ._ ► - `' -_•7.1. . .-- ._ ' • i. Davao.Rewes not swrrera+ee Orono.MN 35359 t ' r' Y iA 1' t _. ! yam, 7 `..` i r y• + v Sabel a yew Nona Oanar Brian Swanson 8 Amy Swanson } r.. -,. •— t 1 \ If:�j w: i;- &YWISWANSONaAMY SWANSON g 7 4 ~ J (, Taxpayer 4025 WATERTOWWN RD 4'X^a:r', b,t. { - R -• J A, _ I ,f ''.-t- �e . ------- MAPLE PLAIN MN55355 T• y 81 l� ''.y,• i r s'♦ 4'. jt.,T.' r , s' NIP�aYMA `) _ _' �IC/I/ ,1,A„ 1r� .,r ,'',I s I S "v! '' �'r.1.\/,-* r ], ♦ Rouse Number t307 aces 8� �• '1= 7a� '�„` •Vi t !,• - Parcel Annotation Parc".".." 565.255 sq fl •1 f.-t I 7 Y c1. 2 - Q ��'- 1 t‘0,......" Survey Morurttetae Torrena/Abare0.AEatraa w r .•�, �, • / • 7 j ''�} d _Sur+rf Grid r. • Adauon Unplaoee 31 016 23 %..4' *j " f„`t` - i r, , ,'"•v. } yr. 1 U,rkoo T r.Mn1 h Lot: j.f Market value Aunt Yr 2021 .)..4 r ! .,..,,,,.....0.:„.,,,,,...://, f M.natvaa.a.mtrr2oz� Brock: � fi .2 Beg AIT.Im en Of Sl Llne of y _ 'fi f rv ,............„:,,,..",...„.c!,, + Y r""'V 1 L.l {3 Recency Sold Watertown Rds n E Line of Se vel TS 0 ? Tr ,/, ASS o � y f.ISweraL PaaperYse Metes 8. NA AlongSAE L To Its :A; j,4r • F Bounds Intersection t tth E Line Of W 20 r (� f 2 Note ThisAPartial Mews y \y t �' t/ my 1 .i Bounds Description. _(•/' 4� •"'"'• MF' ` 1C! .1.;.-.'..;-;" ^+' it I ` '� J J-_-', • Menet la'�5 S.9503r �•.,f•Property Type R«Ident:al T C . 7 ,Honwsteae. Homestead � vw 5 1978 r] 7 Y t• j t.` TaxDAa IASSonSed 4j +j 4 • 4" r r 5 - . Market Howe. 3782 000 ,,..., d-=1• "' _ - * ^;,:- T :,..1-: . '' !. t\ ' .7, iProperty Type Residentialri i tT r �na '..- y. - 9, ...... ♦ s y'i 1,- . Homestead Homestead r 7f �, T : T_a �. t Y l ' j tT Year Buff1978 •r ,t d-1",' y� a1 t - '1 P • +% a=1111111111111111 -r «c" A I $fir 4 ,} iv. t 1jy�r =***/1 .r ` . ,,a-._ 2 - y/. r 11<'( • • - y- :ps a x s Type an address or a property ID(PID) Search helq A Property Potential lot Measure nperty links #i , t � # w Sq Feet Its lines of 4 3 Measurement Result 823410012 1 low _ �` �. *4 159,721.7 Sq Feet property S. �"" own Rd t:` . 3.65 acres e ' A Disci. er:Results not survey-grade 15359 r st 1 `; �rnaycry Iwner/Taxpayer ,' " Ilt `- Select a year None Brian Swanson&Amy ' Swanson • '' t - N t r 0. BRIAN SWANSON& _ t, 1?" # `-1.1,11,-'t. AMY SWANSON t Map layers411 4025 WATERTOWN '• RD ii House Number MAPLE PLAIN MN ` ♦r 1 . , f. \ o tr t` O Parcel Annotation 359 x 4 t ;, ;5,,h OSurvey Monuments 4i147"11P— ,. . u ri .4 j_, rh ' "r OS Survey 13.07 acres t Abstract/Torrens/Both 569,255 sq ft r�?r E ; Z Market Value Asmt Yr 2020 act: Abstract y . •s• z Market Value Asmt Yr 2021 A.�,r y 't ,ter; l # !. 1 Li Recently Sold Unplatted 31 118 23 r,t,' ^ r € s _ a '� sk,o, t'_ ..„ s r, °�''-; rveyed Properties Ito • 'x = ; '' 4:` ''.!. .*, 30r.' wide shared driveway Beg At The Intersection ( ^�' 11 Of Sly Line Of ', !k A. d „,..1.47..; .F , ' a .+t .. , ,, Watertown Rd With E y.. s1'” x „,,,,,,...„.......i,...; «fig �. :: --if Line Of Se 1/4 Th Nwly y r ' Along Said Sly Line To41kCreek , { �; Its Intersection With E �� e4:;—',..14.) " r � Line Of 20 ,,a. ,w ^*�r r : r 3�'"' - ,, t. i !P Note:This Is A Partial + k -r; s �a t` Metes&Bounds } ya ,...,,,,.....%, t> : sfi vasa �, t I Description. -` 't r `f ssessed 2020, Payable "i,,., �4` , * ' , ;t. tit" a 'Ns to... '�" — — x ♦ 3 a. -- 0 ' ! . 0 i _ -pis Tyne ar address or a prope y i0(PID) Sgafth help '' Measure Property pproximate 44rw, - ""o, vi - o e links :,. i!,..-..' -',7.... _`" " ' _-. „ — p rry b ildable dryee Itslandi ` , 4 Measurement Result t. 823410012 t >. t 41 K 95,096.9 Sq Feet own Rd r Abut 2. 18 acres '.', 2-18 acres 15359 t , �r1namrgary -r Disclaimer ults not -grade wner/Taxpayer I e T;• {' , , t 1,, r Se e �'t „ > Brian Swanson&Amy iIli- J,t4 - • " r f - x rb:�a Swanson I _ BRIAN SWANSON& " 5 . — -- AMY SWANSON i a `.I t ", , '� Map layers1111 4025 WATERTOWN [ r %: f'4 e House Number RD l�. , MAPLE PLAIN MND ''' 4 - �' Q Parcel Annotation 55359 A Survey Monuments *- Tax Parcel .k '� 7": .f i r• ��Survey Grid 13.07 acres '�` ' iw i" I [�Abstract/Torrens/Both 569,255 sqft • 11 t Market Value Asmt Yr 2020 act: Abstract ` Market Value Asmt Yr 2021 Unplatted 31 118 23 * .'� ,•i Recently Sold ' , r�"4% ,,. II Surveyed Properties •., Ni).:7"': w House • • f¢ Beg At The Intersection • Of Sly Line Of 'r fitt .c.,'" i"ed �. Watertown Rd With E m' >a. ra env„'► a ' , Line Of Se 114 Th Nwly . '` - • c Along Said Sly Line To _ 'w • R ° k ' Its Intersection With E +� *®' ; Line Of W 20 +' YDS t t a Note:This Is A Partial g . iv .w �, Metes&Bounds t � +, � r'" ,-L • ,#� -,:-4,..0•1•,:,,, Description. iit '". 4 r ?,...-4.- . n „.iii i: ' ... . i,i.7,::ilt7.,:i..,';•,..":47ii,—.... i:i„,:i ; . i i i i, Go.„. .,:,* ..+.:,__.--,. .. . 7.-- } . q# �`... ¢: [i, •'Y:'.+t'a .' m • • ps Type an address or a property ID!PID) Search help �v ,�• " ' ', Property - 4,t.4.11,• •, .r � ����' ...*4... �r_ , F� . �. r = t>"" � b� � y,." � , •.,. • operty links4 .,--4. �, V rl i r "'�+, � Map layers t ItsA1111 r Basemaps 823410012 , -a , i :. !*41,4,,,..7:,- , �+ Road 5wnRd— — — i"�. r+ 15359 ,.a ,� r cll. 'a, fi4 ''� ; ¢ , Imagery wner;Taxpayr ti >Tk 0`" , ili 4d Select a year None 9 yrs` Brian Swanson&AmyJi,` + r t Swanson 4025 Watertown Rd Baser,+r BRIAN SWANSON& , t ' '' , AMY SWANSON Orono, MN 55359 t I� } Map layers ''moi 4025 SWANSWATEROWN y RD '� t } � ' . . 1 House Number MAPLE PLAIN MN '+ >. >Y Parcel Annotation 359 • t , >„'"'' O Survey Monuments t i ,+r'=, '' r41; S ,•.... 4114''' ' # _�Survey Grid _, __ 3 r• . ' �. s: Marketct/Torrens/Both 13.07 acres *kiti. , 569,255 sq ft f 'I's ' t a� " "� ' Value Asmt Yr 2020 411 • , r act: Abstract dsi ; '• �" t.°'; Market Value Asmt Yr 2021 „:„.,''..1:::::....*:;;;.::',, .c ., r: ..l Recently Sold Un tatted 31 118 23 �,, ' - ' e - ' Q Surveyed Properties Beg At The Intersection Fv w t t,' ,r -.• " .-\ s ; ir, r',r fif Of Sly Line Of 1 A;: ; • ,;. �'- Its Intersection With E { F r !1 C v i•''''': �'° � � * :' � ���«R .pe Line OfW20 '!,*3 't � 4,.;,2' },""s*,p�. �; ¢).. 1 `h Note:This Is A Partial £ • , r 7:-....,".•,,'!-:,,,,,`,-;,,„,-.11,,,,_ s � �s ti f :::,,-;:7-.4y.. .„.. x ;1 lk, . Metes 8 Bounds s" mrd .� a'' y', t• ' ,c 1. •it'''--7!c'27,1•"" --7!c' ...",71.4.i.'2., , 'i` r ' • a tifs.. Description. • +..4..1-•..„44. '' ! e s ! + s essed 2020,Payable , w { . " ' to.•ori `tr, • ,' F . � .:>` + !'-`N � it. ill • PC Exhibit C .f � C.....1' __ nr ..., ~t� 1 „ 22 02 r ..r 0.43 s sure, (WN 1 • r � ��, � i y'i` , V' �`i ti l l( Ai g '*t. Legend .. ..�1. �/S. u �, r t s "' ' --I'd' r f�"�p� •r, �'1i Railroad MR t i - { x r7 :a, { Cltit City Limits r e t ! /. ♦ f• 'C� ' ,-rt..;,..: Parcels(4/1/22) 1 N r'� r / i ' • I • Y ,#e!t '- _ r,•,e,., Wetlands 6:0 ;� �1 I !IF , c 6• r. 4 l - .-, w*I u:. Preserve-50' `, F �,,iel Ii. 1 ..14. ; y n� ,: Y v'A •+,,{ • ' � 4.-, ..- Y. .. ss Manage 1-35' j1• JZ.. r i7'n' *�'.j ��' � . ' 0 Manage 2-25 r+111, t '�'�i�• �' )y4' '. •may ..p "4..141!' fP 4GG7 4�i,a�.ne x, • •a Manage 3-16.5 .�e1yA* d iii% t,. .1.,'L -,. t!i �,y,,_ , 4,., t Yr' .. �:' Q 'fit'' ; 1 . T Unclassified I t. !'a. �{gyp ri ' I {'!� • �, i ❑ ` ^_•7J •r i" �/�+. It a +. . •� tr •t-' 440' S D Boundary r iAj1r' Footprint y /$ h '' 4" Image • �" , \ t! i.. •4Y F 4 ' y0�; - , 1 1, t z.. .� ■ Red: Rad /3/4:44P; t.5'.','"5. ' -,,,.�- .' b. ..',Ili' t e, , s ' . °I;, ,. F,. '" i, #' z'',� Green:Greeniiit • y�?,, a.'zs. J:44P;' tic., .'W� ti 4 f" ' } 4 -; @ 7.` �r a j' ., tf .. .�. Blue.ewe i14 ry�,�; yy� .41 • tI, ( I``, Y144.4,-, ,,." ti 4g ...♦ , ,„ 147 „" �, g �: �4 M: 'fi ' 3• -.....i" .�•:�• r �. — 0t'At. i� 'ale. ��' 4' Map Name APti e _ y • "e' �t ,- +may r A: uh am.r: ---- — ___ O mhar.wmgh�e�mer a.wnyraereea mzp ro„ BOLTON ..yenaaroomaoanton.a:<ne 400 Feet er,wing is.wmv�uoo�,....1.717::::: & M E N K bvt. p anry,ce.nry, u seaeccing the area shown.end of Ee users kr reference purposes only.the<Iry or sono�s rot moNNO 0 Bolton&Menk,Inc-Web GIS 6/16/2022102 PM peal People.Real Solutionsr.,ronani.mr.n�m..�,..ri..h.r.*n�m.i�•4. • 0 ?��, BOLTON :; City Of Orono &MENK Parcel ID:3111823410012 = x < I want to 1 ,F./ I„,,,,,,,,\I ~� Descriptor. q... � — — 7 s / r• d / y a \ BRIAN SWANSON BiAMY SWANSON d11 l•r / � f`_,,SIk•H_;iv�N,7-_ ,;��\ 4025 Watertown Road 8_ '',"�/ ,r' View Pri2010 ,nformati41 ii ( iiii.."''''./' ,,� Hyperlinks ytiT . +C 1_ 1 i L ia { z ` w.. pfypgly inlormatbn,earth J°Y> ‘<''k.,-ii .'—',...r.-.'(4'''' ,.*'.:.f` .� I _ , e-' +r Details 'cit. • Lp Cone ,� T c ,•.r- k i"/� i y 55359 f-4T:r• / Sc ` �tioi” Pi / _ `__. ._/r / I Z U�ED 31 118 23 6^ J � Block • -{� / L i Lot .r'u,r,L wa�ea— '� 130Acres t . ' • Y Owner Owner Name \ N. `� /i l� BRIAN SWANSON&AMY SWANSON ,Mau • - •\ ! - ��." L_ '.w / �Q�xk>, Tax Name py, f ( �.[yti..r>J 4 ,4 / BRIAN SWANSON&AMY SWANSON [,!,!I ■� `\,, ..,,,id,,_ ,, _ f it i / Y Tax Addre551 'S+4 r� `eR r 4025 WATERTOWN RD c 77 Tax Address ;'}'•e r .. � �••. F MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 yi 6:1V.SInL;Rn " >, ,�r "-�'- .__ r. ~ I/I o ..� - HIG li LA. Tax Addfe553 � 4 �*.. +� 4 N/A , Homestead ^ / Yes ! i �\\ Z7c✓ a rr; .ty te,e= CI Parcel 1D:31118234100.. I r u ',' A _ / • • ••$. .,,,,,tr-•',?Y'' -.•.. Tr 47e,‘I'lllitt,,,,,:•••; -1.,,t1.1,„.,' •., •• .-- • - ," .' .. :, '` . '''4"---; tw.,,..4•41 00.4itt. •. *--4 - d, 4 ,,,,• ..„..., , ot, .e--,4y- NE Z.e• .4"t4is: A ' ', tar..iiiii-Agt ,iPlt 3 s ' 'ffartliti7 :,t. •)3t -' ,, . 5,.. -r. , . , .V ''• ..••• .",t El 4- I;„4'MC ni •••; - ''44•,* .i.-'. I • ' ' ',,,4,: , ••,1 4,„:;?,, • _ ,....',. .0,..'• ,„,,,,I,;.,irs prijt„, ---,... limilim,.. _.0._ ...a. ,.., ...., oar, 405u00,/ ..- . .A.., t: : ,1.4 - - ilim -11. . - •--, -- . 'Ia.. ., pg.- ,,-.) • ia. L. Legend 1 t -evf 00-- 110-1 L ,r).4., l ' Railroad . .,i...,... Fske , I i .ii.r„ ' &i, I 0 City Limits ,, . :_ii0 . PO NI IMI 0 Parcels(4/1/22) 1.i. r..,*i---Pi. - , 2040 MUSA --1 .._, l''‘I'r.;:to,..., -1 Boundary. - ---, ‘ . -. , •-: ,.-J jot,...-.4.; i Footprint 1=1:I-E-Y-,; ' ' Image . ' >* I I iictiv 1 A . Red Red •.. CC A' •Y-Z TA_BLVMW MIS 7,,,,_, 1111 P . Green Green .Algrf4011.4,,,..iiilt. lk' R,., • ''-, - . , Z ig . Blue Blue l'75:•.`4.' .---''''"''''' f. ) 3ICSt ... - - i 1= ..?L •••••••, -...r. 1-'7' .1..•_,_'-"5:i - -'' . .;e) *--•!--er eZ ,:'''''.,7,..7.711%.,,,_ ,LCt : t, - . , 0 • • C•4 i .- l.'! *"-rel.,:1,,,:-..., z - •& ,t, • -..--0:s HWY N012 - - ---- ' '- • ,.,,,,. ° • ,,, „igit . 4....„H - ...._ ,.. 0- .4..11„,.._ „,,, ,_ . . ,,,. • . •4 x 0. •1.' \ 1r' ..` 1 ,....lic, i Ye' ••••ii ...:`'‘. . .-./,f. r '' 1;I •-`.4 ..- ..,.. co ' 1 '.!---044,,,`,' ' . , ,, . ''. t`A ..• • 0-'i* " ' '.4,1'• :.". *, 'cf,,itieztSSI _.'"°) _..• '- ' '"f"' iWrislitic . • '''`-.....,,,, r- mcr opiq 1- -: - r--••• (4..y„kiaa4 ilea kka: ' kelp)... - cci,...1%•;-%1/k,.. -.- . t-A ILVElli L.. ,, , , 0 •...,;;,....„(0,„ i±,414,,,-- * „ , -,,, „ -,1,". ' -• cA 1.;s,to,li i;-,,-"Mt4/ 01' 'l'k....r,i 134 la' ' 1664111,V - 1 71 - I:- .- 16,1: ....-.____, tt., : 414.424. 10*-e,g-3 tim,h,"Nli"In ' -.... 414, . ,r* 24 Vtica'‘11 ,'r ' LI 4 41.-.MieN ,FANISC A.M.0 ,. ....eI -At AlW1 I .... , -- ..i... r•..... ..,. ,t, . . . ......„ 1 tzeitiiEMv %,:).WIMptiFitta, . ,,.. .,Ir CG .. V;;c144C'• r,., '. \ '': -• -. ' ", ' 04)0;7- if• 9:1‘.4vigati- .., ,.„... ..,,,,,,k.: , _ . i • i.i.„ . w - co. 0 alro*.V ti,......:,.:), 1 . -, , " - ,,•!'.,..tfyik,-, :.s.L.,...., wr c, .. . . „. , . ,,,_,,ii.,4,4e..,,...,,,, ,,.. , ....„*„.. ... Po," L4 ,.. .,........""..•T !I 'i .c.; ro.,4-6,-,*; ,cop-„-..,gt,; tr;- L-4 ,'''''7 -.• . - . 1,----- rdlibiz:, .A.R, iL -o .Dget4.4--1.` - -- ----4" • ,i; (... . ,... .-1 . ,-*, •\.• M—'Oce,-- =21 AI Iiirouri I Map Name "' • i.,:f.r f 3'. ; , ' --ElAY-='' - ow .• - *,..414 ...... 1 ... gIrlir -74'--Wv 4470.* , '3 lia,...4;,.,i.e........ , , ,,,_ . , . t, ,. rr..`";',...-•--, -NW ,ow . ,=_-_...-- -)4 A/LI a tilli". ' - •''''''''',,..... -......--'---r.et ci,., • . : 0 WI" •iiner i IMP. ,,a),1241s--0 .,'6' ; ''i 'X4'..4- '. 1 ...— Pam This sisswin8 is neither.1.01.,"°•d"rnaP"‘a This• ••• BOLTON & M E N K 0 1,600 Feet ....mi.tor any isurnitaties h•rein rm.. ,Bolton&Menk,Inc-Web GIS 6/16/2022 1 14 PM Real People.Real Solutions. * • tea% 2040 Comprehensive Plan Proposed Future Land Use 0BOLTON \ ' Orono,MN August 2021 &MEN K Real People.Real Solutions. 8.Turner Road v r!Iii �� - 3ardA -,,, 0 ..- Yea _ E z m , ,„,1",,,,6,,s��q$I �it1 Id,. I. E ,` Ch w.k Drake Dr d 4. $�13 b"�. �. �1 Crin I -.._ D o ' • y�11111 ee , Ll larillgar j 4 N. �. I x.s ._ Q f - 3 �� Lak �. r f'9, I S u ; 1112. '6 Ile'`\ cr 1 11-4:111.4414-, '- :•r{ 1.;:_ to-';'-: ‘,.' ,\ ; o •* ( m ' aN"® r � ��., s '° . ._� � ey ..tom k K IleyP O i 0379.,6„:•:11,..1&� " L r .r s ,! ■1 y �a Density Reduced �-. to 8-15 units/acre 111u� i-' ,, , At i,io, ,, >• aiii j IA- l I w' ..Tf. '.'a .tyA N W- '/ 2-1 141 C{ :t,"-%-'''',';., ,1 ,- impp„ ii. ! 1 N IN;rr,,, crys.l- n r a�q c`"'""0. .„ ',lam`. iiiiit- b --Air 9 $ l i7�yt B yb '`,-11 •l / Si' v. .,s J® .:' .-• '. a ° }. , ty F - e d � ° `,: + 4 ` O a°. °eBSlty Reduced i ' 'County Road 151 ••I. O • North \` L. "� 15- R h• Amr ,.r . . Ponape Bay.:, iF s 'rl li- 2 'n Maxwell a.' � ji: Bar r �rtr l ' Frerrch �. S tl '''4,,',.,. °+_ B sannyn.le Rose el F sr4 sea C s' �s r eq s 1�;(!7k .14" ri -��''s 6- I-,r�e,1g9g vl s'04 _ L� n , .. $d e s rn 1 1 III yl Y SII @ m ear • Point 8 - eta mem 1 `,ra 1 Near as ♦�. �_,, - Land Use Classes ~ ♦ it..7°, Arm c rde............ ♦ ;. S Laken 4 .f� ;4. Barr B nns Rural Preserve Urban Low Urban High a Lake :;3 po r♦ m Harrison ,� 1 ♦ „ Lake di (1 unit/5 acres) Density Density ° 46. s1/ a�� Bar A ••-„� I M ercrc::a 1 Residential(3- iii Residential(20- Lynwood[NW/ 1°IW 1w''�� ♦ d` .l' A 1 1 Rural a units/sae) 25 units/acre) €MY /.6nae„ne u'..-. �A -4.n.,7,•,-...,-,7;4,,Fax rI” t 1 Residential(1 Urban Medium f4 • = iY TR p,er AE sacs `�1, L.nysrY 1 1 unit/2 acres) Density Commercial/ t`i � �l�.�. A 4 Bey , 4 1 illResidential/ ORce ^!j -` f >> Residential Mixed Use 8- .a. 1 LE End ® y"'o+'�, ♦ ♦ ellt > Residential 9 0 ♦ p� r �� > 15 units/acre) di Industrial `� _ ROe '•S• I ♦♦ ♦> Urban Estate Urban Medium Park, �'r: cit Limits takeaa Pones / yl ' 'c -r'l. >> :„iii4Density High Density Recreational, I g a > Residential(0.5di b ,a' 11 ♦ �'' I -2 units/acre) Residential re)- and Open ra L-- 2040 MUSA Riven a Streams a o$y ,> , 20 units/acre) Space �1 g Feet 00 t,.. ., o. . I �.'caxo♦ 41van, 1 le ( Source:Met.Council,City of Orono, ��•a.��.. aMap$B-$8Henne.in Count MnDOT rFihI IS L t bra _,A11.11.APEMITIM►trisgrTiL ii■1l' •