Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05-09-2022 Council Packet
Agenda Council Meeting Monday, May 9, 2022 6:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us The public is invited to address the council regarding any item on the regular agenda. If your topic is not on the agenda, you may speak during the Public Comments section. Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Agenda Consent Agenda 1. City Council Meeting Minutes of April 25, 2022 2. Council Work Session Minutes of April 25, 2022 3. Claims/Bills 4. Approval to Hire Part-Time Officer 5. 2022 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Award (22-014) 6. Appointment of 2022 Seasonal Employees V6 7. Request to Hire Full-Time Public Works Maintenance Worker 8. Summit Beach Master Planning (Project 22-055) 9. Approval of Lake Access Markings 10. Public Works Facility (21-039)- Bids Zoning Report 11. LA21-000051 – Robert Linden Construction, 1074 Loma Linda Ave., Setback Variances 12. LA22-000014 – Eric Zehnder, 940 North Arm Drive, Variance – Resolution No. 7264 13. LA21-000076 – Yardscapes, Inc., Lincoln Danforth, 1720 Bohns Point Road, Variance – Resolution No. 7265 Public Comments – (Limit 3 Minutes per Person) This is an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. The council will not engage in discussion or take action on items presented at this time. However, the council may refer issues to staff for follow up or consideration at a future meeting. Speakers should state their name and home address at the podium before speaking. Finance Report 14. First Quarter Financial Report Community Development Report 15. LA22-000012 – Stonewood LLC., 2987 & 3005 Casco Point Road and PID 20-117-23-34-0027, Sketch Plan City Attorney Report City Administrator/Engineer Report Agenda Council Meeting Monday, May 9, 2022 6:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us Mayor/Council Report Adjournment Upcoming Events 2022 05-16-2022 Planning Commission Meeting, Monday, 6:00 p.m. (Victoria Seals) 05-23-2022 City Council Work Session, Monday, 5:00 p.m. 05-23-2022 City Council Meeting, Monday, 6:00 p.m. 05-30-2022 Official Holiday, City Offices Closed 06-06-2022 Park Commission Work Session, Monday, 6:00 p.m. 06-13-2022 City Council Work Session, Monday, 5:00 p.m. 06-13-2022 City Council Meeting, Monday, 6:00 p.m. 06-20-2022 Official Holiday, City Offices Closed 06-21-2022 Planning Commission Meeting, Tuesday, 6:00 p.m. (Matt Johnson) 06-27-2022 City Council Work Session, Monday, 5:00 p.m. 06-27-2022 City Council Meeting, Monday, 6:00 p.m. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, April 25, 2022 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 3 ROLL CALL The Orono City Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Dennis Walsh, City Council Members Matt Johnson, Aaron Printup, Richard Crosby III (arrived at 6:02 p.m.), and Victoria Seals. Representing Staff were City Attorney Soren Mattick, City Administrator/Engineer Adam Edwards, Finance Director Ron Olson, and Anna Carlson, City Clerk. Mayor Walsh called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF AGENDA PUBLIC HEARING 1. 3.2 Malt Liquor Off-Sale License – Holiday Superstores LLC, 2420 Shadywood Road Mayor Walsh opened the public hearing at 6:01 p.m. Mayor Walsh closed the public hearing at 6:01 p.m. Printup moved, Seals seconded, to approve the 3.2 Malt Liquor Off-Sale License for 2420 Shadywood Road. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. CONSENT AGENDA 2. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 11, 2022 3. COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES OF APRIL 11, 2022 4. CLAIMS/BILLS 5. APPROVAL OF GARBAGE HAULER LICENSES 6. AUTHORIZATION TO ACCEPT ZACH HWAY RESIGNATION Crosby moved, Johnson seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mayor Walsh stated they have amended the public comment time to 3 minutes and will put a timer on the clock. After 3 minutes the microphone will muted. Mayor Walsh asked to take a five minute recess. Crosby seconded the recess. Mayor Walsh resumed the meeting at 6:10 p.m. and invited the public forward for public comments. Jay Nygard, 1386 Rest Point Road, stated he lives right down the road from weasel Walsh and noted the City Council is really an embarrassment. He cannot believe the City Council just walked out on his three minute comment and held an open meeting violation in the back rather than just letting him talk. It goes to MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, April 25, 2022 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 3 show the character of this Council, as does taking public comment time from five minutes to three minutes, putting a clock up, and stating that the microphones will be shut off. Mr. Nygard wishes he had a mirror so everyone could look at themselves instead of looking to blame other people. Instead what has gone on with this City Council is trying to keep the Veterans off Big Island, trying to give away a park, giving away a fire lane to a Planning Commissioner; there are a lot of things they should be thinking about. It is really sad to Mr. Nygard that someone who has been here – most likely longer than any of them – is that they are doing it to his community. He sees two people willing to look at him which says something about the Council, also. It is really disappointing in this day and age that they would play games like this when he knows that Walsh himself ran on transparency. Mr. Nygard asked what kind of transparency is it in taking public comments down from five minutes to three? What kind of transparency is it when the City Council must leave the room to talk, hold each other’s hands in the background, and make sure nobody says or does anything wrong? It is sad what this Council is doing to the City, and it is sad that this Council does not have character and does not have transparency. It is sad what they are doing to the residents of the community with the criminal prosecutions and everything else. Mr. Nygard is not going to say anything but will let the City Council’s five minutes to three minutes stand as a testament to what this City Council is. FINANCE DIRECTOR REPORT Finance Director Olson had nothing to report. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT Attorney Mattick has a conflict on the May 9, 2022 City Council meeting but Leah Koch will be there in his place. CITY ADMINISTRATOR/ENGINEER REPORT Edwards updated the City Council, noting the following day is the public works facility bid opening and they will bring those bids before the Council at the next meeting. City Staff will be transitioning the automated payroll system and will be training over the next two weeks. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Seals noted Sunday from 8:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. is the Long Lake Fire Department’s pancake breakfast which is a fun event to come out and support the firemen and get to know community members. She noted many of the local fire departments donated their used gear to Ukraine and there is a semi-trailer load of gear going overseas. Printup had nothing to report. Crosby stated boating season will start soon and, as they learned from a recent call, it is a reminder if you are on your boat alone to please wear your lanyard and your life jacket. Johnson had nothing to report. Walsh shared that this weekend is the Orono Foundation bash which raises money for the school, supplies, computers, and other things for the kids. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, April 25, 2022 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 3 Crosby moved, Walsh seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 6:20 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ATTEST: _____________________________________ _______________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Orono City Council Work Session Minutes Monday, April 25, 2022 Council Chambers 5:00 p.m. Page 1 of 1 PRESENT: Mayor Dennis Walsh, Council Members Aaron Printup, Victoria Seals, and Matt Johnson. Staff members present were City Administrator/Engineer Adam Edwards, and City Clerk Anna Carlson. 1.Fire Department Update City Administrator/Engineer Adam Edwards began discussion explaining the two options laid out in the packet. Edwards is looking to Council for feedback on the request for proposal for fire and rescue department operational study. Mayor Dennis Walsh noted that phase one will include working with a consultant and then developing the plan. Edwards discussed a timeline for planning out the process. 2.Internet Discussion Edwards began explaining the broadband internet availability options within Orono and opened discussion with the questions outlined in the memo. Council Member Victoria Seals expressed concerns with Mediacom and noted it would be preferred that they provided better service to our residents. She added that is seems that the city cannot do much about it. Walsh noted the city doesn’t have enough population to get more fiber out here. Walsh asked staff to reach out to some of the other providers to encourage them to take a look at our city. Adjourned: 5:48 p.m. CITY OF ORONO: ATTEST: ________________________________ Dennis Walsh, Mayor _________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: Ck Reviewed By: RJO Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve payment of claims made on the City for services and/or products provided to the City. 2. Background. The attached claims for payment have been received by the City. Staff has reviewed the claims and is recommending approval of the listing for payment. The claims will be paid by checks 118566 to118653 and ACH transactions 20130251 to 20130253, totaling $144,004.68. 3. Noteworthy Payments. Vendor Amount Description of Payment #118587 Abdo Eick & Meyers $8,000.00 2021 Audit progress billing. #118612 Ferguson Waterworks $3,152.07 Meter for the Ice Arena - 1025 Old Crystal Bay Rd. #118615 Granicus $8,007.75 Annual contract for streaming meetings. 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of a motion authorizing payment to the claims list as presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the claims list as presented. Exhibits A. Check Register Item No.: 3 Date: May 09, 2022 Item Description: Claims/Bills Presenter: Ron Olson Finance Director Agenda Section: Consent Agenda City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 4/26/2022 - 5/9/2022 May 05, 2022 01:58PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount ACT ASPHALT SPECIALTIES 04/29/2022 118566 2022.04 ACT 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - Z21-13 875 PARTENWOOD 1,000.00 Total 118566:1,000.00 ADVANCED RENOVATION GRO 04/29/2022 118567 2022.04.22 A 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RAS20-61 350 N ARM LN 1,000.00 Total 118567:1,000.00 BRAID, MICHAEL 04/29/2022 118568 2022.04 BAI 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - Z21-43 2700 COUNTRYSIDE 1,000.00 Total 118568:1,000.00 BYINGTON HOMES 04/29/2022 118569 2022.04 BYI 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - LA22-08 1270 WILDHURST T 700.00 Total 118569:700.00 DEAN & KELLY LEISCHOW 04/29/2022 118570 2022.04 LEIS 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RAS20-69 2995 DEER RUN 1,000.00 Total 118570:1,000.00 FREDERIC & CYNTHIA WUNDE 04/29/2022 118571 2022.04 WU 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - LA22-13 2726 CAROLINE A 700.00 Total 118571:700.00 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 04/29/2022 118572 3270-535373 101-43000-240 SHOP TOOLS - HOSE PINCH PLIER Public Works Department 22.12- GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 04/29/2022 118572 3270-535388 701-49800-222 UNIT #712 BACK UP LIGHTS 84.52 Total 118572:62.40 LECY BROS HOME & REMODEL 04/29/2022 118573 2022.04 LEC 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RAS20-06 4515 NORTH SHO 1,000.00 Total 118573:1,000.00 LIEBSCH, MATT 04/29/2022 118574 2022.04 LIEB 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - LA22-25 920 DAKOTA AVE 850.00 Total 118574:850.00 LONG LAKE ROWING CREW 04/29/2022 118575 2022.04 LON 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND LA21-77 455 EAST LONG LAK 700.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 2 Check Issue Dates: 4/26/2022 - 5/9/2022 May 05, 2022 01:58PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 118575:700.00 NARAY, ETHAN DE 04/29/2022 118576 2022.04 NAR 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - LA22-06 860 BROWN RD S 5,000.00 Total 118576:5,000.00 OPTUM 04/29/2022 118577 9415392 101-41900-319 HSA MAINTENANCE FEE 1ST QTR 2022 Central Services 286.00 Total 118577:286.00 PAULUCCI, GINA 04/29/2022 118578 2022.04 PAU 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RAS19-11 320 WOODHILL R 1,000.00 Total 118578:1,000.00 PRECISION DECKS 04/29/2022 118579 2022.04 PRE 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND RAS20-65 - 380 RUANN RD 1,000.00 Total 118579:1,000.00 RUDOLPH, PATRICK 04/29/2022 118580 2022.04 RUD 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RAS20-07 2350 SHADOWO 1,000.00 Total 118580:1,000.00 SHEP'S CONSTRUCTION 04/29/2022 118581 2022.04 SHE 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RAS19-59 565 FERNDALE 1,000.00 Total 118581:1,000.00 SMITH, PARKER 04/29/2022 118582 2022.04 SMI 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RAS21-56 2140 NORTH SH 1,000.00 Total 118582:1,000.00 TOPPIN, RICHARD & KATHERIN 04/29/2022 118583 2022.04 TOP 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RPS20-26 640 LAKEVIEW P 10,000.00 Total 118583:10,000.00 VOGSTROM, ERIC 04/29/2022 118584 2022.04 VO 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - Z19-15 2710 PENCE LN 1,000.00 VOGSTROM, ERIC 04/29/2022 118584 2022.04 VO 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - LA18-86 2710 PENCE LN 700.00 VOGSTROM, ERIC 04/29/2022 118584 2022.04 VO 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RAS20-95 2710 PENCE LN 1,000.00 VOGSTROM, ERIC 04/29/2022 118584 2022.04 VO 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RAS20-35 2710 PENCE LN 1,000.00 VOGSTROM, ERIC 04/29/2022 118584 2022.04 VO 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RAS19-24 2710 PENCE LN 9,300.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 3 Check Issue Dates: 4/26/2022 - 5/9/2022 May 05, 2022 01:58PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount VOGSTROM, ERIC 04/29/2022 118584 2022.04 VO 101-34430 LA19-50 2710 PENCE LN INVOICE # 20141949 330.00- Total 118584:12,670.00 WEBBER, CASEY 04/29/2022 118585 04212022- C 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RSP20-11 1775 FOX ST 10,000.00 Total 118585:10,000.00 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 05/02/2022 118586 2022.04 UB 651-49910-322 04/22 UTILITY BILLS Storm Water 316.58 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 05/02/2022 118586 2022.04 UB 601-49400-322 04/22 UTILITY BILLS Water 316.59 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 05/02/2022 118586 2022.04 UB 602-49450-322 04/22 UTILITY BILLS Sewer 316.59 Total 118586:949.76 ABDO EICK & MEYERS LLP 05/09/2022 118587 456673 101-41500-301 2021 AUDIT Finance Department 8,000.00 Total 118587:8,000.00 ABM Equipment & Supply LLC 05/09/2022 118588 0170762-in 701-49800-221 UNIT #421 ANNUAL BOOM INSPECTION 980.54 Total 118588:980.54 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIO 05/09/2022 118589 471037168 710-49970-413 PW COPIER LEASE 04/20/22-05/20/22 132.76 Total 118589:132.76 AIR MECHANICAL 05/09/2022 118590 2022.05 AIR 101-32510 BP REFUND - P22-77 WRONG CITY 32.50 Total 118590:32.50 All Flags LLC 05/09/2022 118591 376260 101-43000-224 FLAGS AND POLS Public Works Department 698.54 Total 118591:698.54 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 05/09/2022 118592 16GR-G6RV-101-43000-222 VEHICLE EQUIPMENT & PAQRTS Public Works Department 69.94 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 05/09/2022 118592 16GR-G6RV-101-43000-221 VEHICLE EQUIPMENT & PAQRTS Public Works Department 263.88 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 05/09/2022 118592 16GR-G6RV-101-43000-240 SMALL TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPMENT Public Works Department 43.96 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE 05/09/2022 118592 16GR-G6RV-651-49910-240 SMALL TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPMENT Storm Water 125.91 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 4 Check Issue Dates: 4/26/2022 - 5/9/2022 May 05, 2022 01:58PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 118592:503.69 BARNUM GATE SERVICES INC 05/09/2022 118593 32932 101-42110-404 BUILDING REPAIRS- SLIDE GATE -PD Police Department 1,961.35 Total 118593:1,961.35 BIFFS INC 05/09/2022 118594 W858929 101-45200-415 BIFF RENTAL Parks 61.07 BIFFS INC 05/09/2022 118594 W858930 101-45200-415 BIFF RENTAL Parks 61.07 BIFFS INC 05/09/2022 118594 W858931 101-45200-415 BIFF RENTAL Parks 73.93 BIFFS INC 05/09/2022 118594 W858932 101-45200-415 BIFF RENTAL Parks 73.93 BIFFS INC 05/09/2022 118594 W858933 101-45200-415 BIFF RENTAL Parks 36.96 BIFFS INC 05/09/2022 118594 W858934 101-45200-415 BIFF RENTAL Parks 61.07 BIFFS INC 05/09/2022 118594 W858935 101-45200-415 BIFF RENTAL Parks 36.96 BIFFS INC 05/09/2022 118594 W858936 101-45200-415 BIFF RENTAL Parks 115.00 BIFFS INC 05/09/2022 118594 W858937 101-45200-415 BIFF RENTAL Parks 36.96 Total 118594:556.95 BOWE, KURT & KELLE 05/09/2022 118595 2022.04 BO 999-10015 UB REFUND - 2815 CASCO PT RD 226.86 Total 118595:226.86 BOYER TRUCKS INC 05/09/2022 118596 003P20613 701-49800-222 UNIT #425 TURN SIGNAL SWITCH 300.48 Total 118596:300.48 CALIBRE PRESS 05/09/2022 118597 49037 101-42110-437 TRAINING Police Department 1,485.00 Total 118597:1,485.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 03/23/22-4/2 101-19999 SUSPENSE 515.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 2022.04 JL 101-45210-402 MOWER REPAIR Golf Course 879.18 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 2022.04 JL 101-45210-489 PIZZA FOR GOLF STAFF Golf Course 42.62 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 2022.04 JL 101-45210-223 CLUBHOUSE SUPPLY Golf Course 32.24 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 3/23/22-4/20/101-41110-439 AC- LUNDS WK SESSION FD Mayor & Council 20.36 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 3/23/22-4/20/101-41110-439 AC- MYBURGER WK SESSION FD Mayor & Council 79.14 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 3/23/22-4/20/101-41110-439 AC- PTBELLYWK SESSION FD Mayor & Council 102.34 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 3/23/22-4/20/101-41110-439 AC- PTBELLY WK SESSION FD Mayor & Council 35.62 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 3/23/22-4/20/101-42110-402 CAR WASH #261 Police Department 11.83 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 5 Check Issue Dates: 4/26/2022 - 5/9/2022 May 05, 2022 01:58PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 3/23/22-4/20/101-42110-402 CAR WASH #261 Police Department 15.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 3/23/22-4/20/101-41110-437 PARKING FEE - CHIEFS CONFERENCE Mayor & Council 37.50 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 3/23/22-4/20/101-41110-437 HOTEL - FARNIOK - CHIEFS CONFERENCE Mayor & Council 727.44 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 3/23/22-4/20/101-41110-437 HOTEL - SONNEK AND SILTALA - CHIEFS CONFE Mayor & Council 511.26 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 3/23/22-4/20/101-41110-437 MEAL-CHIEFS CONFERENCE-FARNIOK Mayor & Council 17.92 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 3/23/22-4/20/603-49500-442 KWIK TRIP - ITEMS FOR CLEANUP 11.13 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 3/23/22-4/20/701-49800-240 TRAILER ELECTRICAL TESTER 177.37 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 3/23/22-4/20/101-43000-221 TRAILER REPAIR Public Works Department 28.93 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 3/23/22-4/20/101-42400-437 NE - PLUMBING CLASS (REF 8186)Building & Zoning 25.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 3/23/22-4/20/101-42400-437 GN - PLUMBING CLASS (REF 8210)Building & Zoning 25.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 3/23/22-4/20/101-42400-437 JB -SLUC (REF 1051)Building & Zoning 58.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 3/23/22-4/20/101-42400-437 NE - SEPTIC TRAINING (REF 2948)Building & Zoning 1,295.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 3/23/22-4/20/101-43000-240 NORTHERN TOOLS- SHOP TOOLS Public Works Department 550.84 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 3/23/22-4/20/602-49450-403 INDECO - GENERATOR HEATERS #602 Sewer 164.88 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05/09/2022 118598 3/23/22-4/20/101-43050-489 INDECO - GENERATOR HEATERS #602 Public Works - Spring Park 164.88 Total 118598:5,528.48 CARTEGRAPH 05/09/2022 118599 INV1153 710-49970-416 CARTEGRAPH ADDITIONAL LICENCES 686.66 Total 118599:686.66 CECE S SIGNS 05/09/2022 118600 8985 701-49800-222 GRAPHICS FOR 481 15.00 Total 118600:15.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 05/09/2022 118601 2022.04 130 602-49450-381 GAS SERVICES 1302 SHORELINE POINT RD 03/Sewer 23.41 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 05/09/2022 118601 2022.04 292 602-49450-381 GAS SERVICE 2922 CASCO POINT RD 03/21/22-0 Sewer 25.56 Total 118601:48.97 Century Link 05/09/2022 118602 2022.04 GC 101-45210-321 GC PHONE/INTERNET 04/19/22-05/18/22 Golf Course 228.58 Total 118602:228.58 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 05/09/2022 118603 0018332 101-42110-402 SQUAD #259 OIL/FILTER/ REAR BRAKE ROTORS Police Department 801.09 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 05/09/2022 118603 0018342 101-42110-402 SQUAD MAINTENANCE Police Department 56.39 Total 118603:857.48 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 6 Check Issue Dates: 4/26/2022 - 5/9/2022 May 05, 2022 01:58PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount City of Orono Utilities 05/09/2022 118604 2022.04 CH&101-41900-382 APRIL 2022 UB CH & PD Central Services 82.22 City of Orono Utilities 05/09/2022 118604 2022.04 CH&101-42110-382 APRIL 2022 UB CH & PD Police Department 82.22 City of Orono Utilities 05/09/2022 118604 2022.04 PO -101-41900-382 APRIL 2022 UB - PO Central Services 84.72 City of Orono Utilities 05/09/2022 118604 2022.04 PW 101-41900-382 APRIL 2022 UB- PW Central Services 125.54 City of Orono Utilities 05/09/2022 118604 2022.04 WTP 601-49400-382 APRIL 2022 UB - WTP Water 145.70 Total 118604:520.40 EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOC 05/09/2022 118605 0126234-IN 101-45200-223 PARK SIGNS Parks 18.95 Total 118605:18.95 ECKBERG LAMMERS PC 05/09/2022 118606 26921 ISA 101-42110-437 TRAINING- WHITE/FOURNIER/HENNESSY/PALM- Police Department 676.00 ECKBERG LAMMERS PC 05/09/2022 118606 26921 ISA 101-42110-437 TRAINING- STRUM/SUSIE/FICHER/TREY- IMRAN Police Department 676.00 Total 118606:1,352.00 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 05/09/2022 118607 888547 101-42400-340 RFP ADVERT Building & Zoning 35.76 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 05/09/2022 118607 888790 101-45210-340 SEASONAL ADVERTISEMENT Golf Course 192.00 Total 118607:227.76 EDWARDS, RICHARD 05/09/2022 118608 2022.04 ED 999-10015 UB REFUND - 2480 CARMAN ST 6.87 Total 118608:6.87 ESS BROTHERS & SONS 05/09/2022 118609 CC1836 602-49450-227 VALVE BOX EXTENSIONS Sewer 2,109.00 Total 118609:2,109.00 FASTENAL 05/09/2022 118610 MNPLY1348 701-49800-221 NUTS AND BOLTS / SHOP SUPPLIES 171.12 Total 118610:171.12 FAUL PSYCHOLOGICAL 05/09/2022 118611 1132 101-42110-319 PSYCH TESTING - SHERMAN Police Department 650.00 Total 118611:650.00 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #25 05/09/2022 118612 0489018 601-49400-227 ICE ARENA METER -1025 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD Water 3,152.07 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 7 Check Issue Dates: 4/26/2022 - 5/9/2022 May 05, 2022 01:58PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 118612:3,152.07 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/09/2022 118613 3270-535473 701-49800-221 UNIT #712 LICENSE LIGHTS 4.74 Total 118613:4.74 GOPHER ACE 05/09/2022 118614 010669/1 101-45210-223 HARDWARE FOR SHOP Golf Course 3.96 GOPHER ACE 05/09/2022 118614 10544/1 101-43000-226 PPE - GLOVES Public Works Department 11.99 GOPHER ACE 05/09/2022 118614 10599/1 701-49800-221 NUTS AND BOLTS 5.44 GOPHER ACE 05/09/2022 118614 10611/1 101-45210-223 HARDWARE FOR SHOP Golf Course 5.50 GOPHER ACE 05/09/2022 118614 10612/1 101-43000-240 RIVET Public Works Department 8.59 Total 118614:35.48 GRANICUS INC.05/09/2022 118615 150947 614-49840-329 STREAMING MEETINGS Cable Franchise 8,007.75 Total 118615:8,007.75 GRAY, MIKE 05/09/2022 118616 2022.04 GRA 999-10015 UB REFUND - 999 WILDHURST TRL 181.44 Total 118616:181.44 HACH CHEMICAL CO 05/09/2022 118617 12991831 601-49400-216 WATER PLANT CHEMICALS Water 164.42 Total 118617:164.42 HEDBLOM, BRUCE 05/09/2022 118618 2022.04 HED 999-10015 UB REFUND - 2601 CASCO PT RD 91.31 Total 118618:91.31 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF 05/09/2022 118619 1000182591 101-41600-309 JAIL INVOICES Law/Legal Services 938.13 Total 118619:938.13 HERITAGE GLASS COMPANY 05/09/2022 118620 22058 701-49800-222 WINDSHIELD 431 361.14 Total 118620:361.14 HOLIDAY COMPANIES 05/09/2022 118621 0796010522 101-42110-402 SQUAD WASHES Police Department 225.50 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 8 Check Issue Dates: 4/26/2022 - 5/9/2022 May 05, 2022 01:58PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 118621:225.50 HOLTON ELECTRIC CONTRACT 05/09/2022 118622 4354 101-43000-240 EXT. CORD FOR THE WELDER Public Works Department 443.13 Total 118622:443.13 HUELER, GREG 05/09/2022 118623 2022.04 HUE 999-10015 UB REFUND - 1398 REST POINT RD 3.87 Total 118623:3.87 JLR GARAGE DOOR SERVICE I 05/09/2022 118624 67139 101-42110-404 BUILDING MAINTENANCE - FIXED GARAGE DO Police Department 150.00 Total 118624:150.00 JR'S ADVANCED RECYCLERS 05/09/2022 118625 107005 603-49500-442 SPRING CLEAN UP 1,029.00 Total 118625:1,029.00 KIRBY BUILT SALES 05/09/2022 118626 KB20000625 101-45200-489 BRONZE PLAQUES FOR DONATED ITEMS Parks 140.60 Total 118626:140.60 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 05/09/2022 118627 W10055 101-43000-402 UNIT #460 SWEEPER REPAIR Public Works Department 7,582.65 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 05/09/2022 118627 W10055 651-49910-402 UNIT #460 SWEEPER REPAIR Storm Water 7,582.64 Total 118627:15,165.29 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 05/09/2022 118628 23203271 701-49800-212 DIESEL FUEL 158.18 Total 118628:158.18 MATTIE LONEY PHOTOGRAPH 05/09/2022 118629 2022.05 101-41110-437 DEPARTMENT PHOTOS -2022 Mayor & Council 3,430.00 Total 118629:3,430.00 MISSION COMMUNICATIONS LL 05/09/2022 118630 1063889 602-49450-406 ANNUAL ALARM SERVICE Sewer 5,410.80 Total 118630:5,410.80 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 9 Check Issue Dates: 4/26/2022 - 5/9/2022 May 05, 2022 01:58PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount MOUND TRUE VALUE 05/09/2022 118631 180383 101-42110-221 MISC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES Police Department 9.49 Total 118631:9.49 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 05/09/2022 118632 1338973-00 101-45210-402 REEL MAINTENANCE Golf Course 1,000.00 Total 118632:1,000.00 NAVARRE HARDWARE 05/09/2022 118633 334240 601-49400-322 UPS SHIPPING CHARGE Water 12.30 NAVARRE HARDWARE 05/09/2022 118633 335213 101-45200-223 ICE RINK SUPPLIES Parks 133.98 NAVARRE HARDWARE 05/09/2022 118633 336416 101-45210-223 GC DOOR REPLACEMENT PARTS Golf Course 18.99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 05/09/2022 118633 336438 602-49450-227 LOCKS Sewer 167.88 Total 118633:333.15 Newegg Business Inc 05/09/2022 118634 1303840534 710-49970-221 KEYBOARS/MICE 132.76 Newegg Business Inc 05/09/2022 118634 1303842809 710-49970-221 SPEAKER - CONF ROOM 39.99 Newegg Business Inc 05/09/2022 118634 1303843747 710-49970-221 KEYBOARD/MOUSE 165.95 Newegg Business Inc 05/09/2022 118634 1303847570 710-49970-221 HDMI CABLES 75.60 Newegg Business Inc 05/09/2022 118634 1303849675 710-49970-221 HDMI CABLE 25.20 Newegg Business Inc 05/09/2022 118634 1303852484 710-49970-221 KEYBOARDS/MICE 151.15 Newegg Business Inc 05/09/2022 118634 1303859949 101-43000-221 MODULAR WORK STATION - PW Public Works Department 159.99 Newegg Business Inc 05/09/2022 118634 1303863964 710-49970-221 DOCKING STATION - PW 343.52 Total 118634:1,094.16 OFFICE DEPOT 05/09/2022 118635 2407780340 101-42110-201 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES Police Department 8.72 OFFICE DEPOT 05/09/2022 118635 2417978990 101-41900-201 HP INK, BUSINESS CARD HOLDER Central Services 101.79 Total 118635:110.51 OUTDOOR EXCAPES OF LAKE 05/09/2022 118636 2022.04 OUT 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RAS20-15 970 WILLOW VIE 1,000.00 Total 118636:1,000.00 REVISON LLC 05/09/2022 118637 2022.04 REV 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RAS20-14 1030 TONKAWA R 1,000.00 Total 118637:1,000.00 SAWOCHKA, MAXWELL 05/09/2022 118638 04262022-Sa 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RPS21-99 150 N SHORE W 1,000.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 10 Check Issue Dates: 4/26/2022 - 5/9/2022 May 05, 2022 01:58PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 118638:1,000.00 Scotty B's Restuarant 05/09/2022 118639 2022.04 101-42110-439 DEPT MEETING Police Department 430.00 Total 118639:430.00 SECOND NATURE GRAPHICS 05/09/2022 118640 456 101-41900-201 BUSINESS CARDS - A HENTGES, K LINDERS Central Services 171.00 Total 118640:171.00 STONEWOOD 05/09/2022 118641 2022.04 STO 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - LA22-12 2987 CASCO POIN 750.00 Total 118641:750.00 STONEWOOD 05/09/2022 118642 2022.04 STO 101-32510 OVERPYMT REFUND - 2987 CASCO POINT RD 750.00 Total 118642:750.00 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/09/2022 118643 1563673 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS - SCHULTZ Police Department 16.98 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/09/2022 118643 1564336 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS - SHERMAN Police Department 367.96 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/09/2022 118643 1564414 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS -WIEBUSCH Police Department 141.96 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/09/2022 118643 1564625 101-42110-226 NEW HIRE UNIFORMS - BRAYDEN SHERMAN Police Department 14.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/09/2022 118643 1564908 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS - RAZE Police Department 74.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/09/2022 118643 1564956 101-42110-226 DUTY BELT - BENIEK Police Department 69.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/09/2022 118643 1564957 101-42110-226 EQUIPMENT - BENIEK Police Department 45.99 Total 118643:732.86 TALLEN AND BAERTSCHI 05/09/2022 118644 2022 PROSE 101-41600-306 PROSECUTION SERVICES-4/2022 Law/Legal Services 3,001.44 Total 118644:3,001.44 TEAM LABORATORY CHEMICAL 05/09/2022 118645 INV0029984 602-49450-227 BACTERIA BUGS FOR LS'S Sewer 2,525.50 Total 118645:2,525.50 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial Inc 05/09/2022 118646 M27252 101-41300-319 CC MEETING MINUTES Administration 154.00 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial Inc 05/09/2022 118646 M27291 101-41300-319 CC MEETING MINUTES Administration 355.38 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial Inc 05/09/2022 118646 M27291 101-42400-319 PC MINUTES Building & Zoning 190.50 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 11 Check Issue Dates: 4/26/2022 - 5/9/2022 May 05, 2022 01:58PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 118646:699.88 TOPO 05/09/2022 118647 2022.04 TOP 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RAS20-59 2875 LITTLE ORC 1,000.00 Total 118647:1,000.00 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 05/09/2022 118648 Z201634 101-41900-404 PW SOUTH GARAGE DOOR REPAIR Central Services 2,428.74 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 05/09/2022 118648 Z202299 101-41900-404 WASH BAY GARAGE DOOR-REPAIR Central Services 475.75 Total 118648:2,904.49 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 05/09/2022 118649 0900689877 101-43000-404 RUGS - PW Public Works Department 19.50 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 05/09/2022 118649 0900689877 701-49800-221 SHOP TOWELS 5.70 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 05/09/2022 118649 0900689877 101-43000-226 UNIFORMS - PW Public Works Department 113.53 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 05/09/2022 118649 0900691228 101-43000-226 UNIFORMS Public Works Department 20.81 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 05/09/2022 118649 0900691228 701-49800-221 UNIFORMS 6.94 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 05/09/2022 118649 0900691228 101-43000-404 UNIFORMS Public Works Department 110.98 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 05/09/2022 118649 0900692572 101-43000-404 RUGS - PW Public Works Department 19.50 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 05/09/2022 118649 0900692572 701-49800-221 SHOP TOWELS 5.70 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 05/09/2022 118649 0900692572 101-43000-226 UNIFORMS - PW Public Works Department 113.53 Total 118649:416.19 US Bank Equipment Finance 05/09/2022 118650 471076851 710-49970-413 COPIERS 596.76 Total 118650:596.76 VESSCO INC 05/09/2022 118651 087355 601-49400-227 HOSES FOR INJECTORS Water 163.46 VESSCO INC 05/09/2022 118651 087356 601-49400-227 INJECTOR HOSES Water 179.39 Total 118651:342.85 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS 05/09/2022 118652 0188945-IN 701-49800-221 REPLACEMENT BROOM BOBCAT /TOOLCAT SW 1,220.00 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS 05/09/2022 118652 018895-IN 701-49800-221 REPLACEMENT BROOM FOR UNIT 621 1,220.00 Total 118652:2,440.00 PAYCHEX 04/29/2022 201302 2278552 710-49970-416 KIOSKS X3 75.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 12 Check Issue Dates: 4/26/2022 - 5/9/2022 May 05, 2022 01:58PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 20130251:75.00 FURTHER 04/29/2022 201302 16052762 101-41900-319 ADMINISTRATION FEE Central Services 49.50 FURTHER 04/29/2022 201302 40206666 101-21719 FSA CLAIM REIMBURSEMENT 7.80 Total 20130252:57.30 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVI 04/29/2022 201302 2021.04 SAC 101-39610 SAC 03/22 24.85- METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVI 04/29/2022 201302 2021.04 SAC 101-20809 SAC 03/22 2,485.00 Total 20130253:2,460.15 MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 04/29/2022 201302 2022.04 101-34210 GENERAL TAXABLE SALES 03/22 1.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 04/29/2022 201302 2022.04 601-20806 WATER TAXABLE SALES 03/22 760.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 04/29/2022 201302 2022.04 101-20806 PW CO-OP/GEN FD OTHER 03/22 6.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 04/29/2022 201302 2022.04 101-37910 GOLF COURSE GREEN FEES 03/22 26.00 Total 20130254:793.00 Grand Totals: 144,004.68 AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: Correy Farniok Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain approval to hire a part-time police officer. An opening exists for a part-time police officer. 2. Background. Jay Dembouski was a police officer with the Orono Police Department for 32 years and retired March 31, 2022. Jay Dembouski would like to work part-time. Jay Dembouski is a hardworking and well respected officer and will be an asset to the Orono police Department. 3. Staff Recommendation. I recommend to hire Jay Dembouski as a part-time police officer at the starting rate of $43.96 per hour, with a start date of May 10, 2022. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the hiring of Jay Dembouski as a part-time police officer at the rate of $43.96 per hour with a start date of May 10, 2022. Item No.: 4 Date: May 9, 2022 Item Description: Request to Hire Part-Time Police Officer Presenter: Correy Farniok Police Chief Agenda Section: Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to award the 2022 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project. 2. Background. Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) provides sanitary sewer treatment for the majority of communities (including Orono) in metropolitan area. Since 2005, MCES has identified Orono as one of the communities who contribute excessive Inflow and Infiltration (I & I). The City has been executing a sanitary sewer rehabilitation project annually to reduce I&I. Each year the City works to identify inflow and infiltration points within the sanitary sewer system thought our annual inspection program. These sites then inform our rehabilitation efforts for the year. In 2020 the City received a excessive flow work plan assignment from MCES based on excessing flows in 2019 for $363,540. I&I mitigation projects in 2020-24 may be used to accomplish the assignment. 3. Scope. The project includes the lining of 1362 feet of sewer main. (Exhibit A) 4. Cost. The city received proposals from 2 contractors (Exhibit B). The low quote was for $151.025.80 from Insituform Technologies. In addition to the construction cost, Bolton and Menk provided a proposal of NTE $14,500.00 for construction oversight. (Exhibit C) Who Work Cost Status Bolton &Menk, Inc Design and Engineering $ 15,000.00 Not to exceed, Previously approved Insituform Technologies Construction $ 151,025.80 Pending award Bolton &Menk, Inc Construction Oversight $ 14,500.00 Not to exceed Total $180,525.80 5. Funding. The project is funded from the Sanitary Sewer Fund. The projected 2022 year end balance is $1,895,052. 6. Staff Recommendation. I recommend council award the project. While the overall cost of the project exceeds the original planning estimates the work needs to be done and can be used to comply with our exceedance work assignment. The scope of the project was adjusted after original quotes were received to get the project within budget. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to award the 2021 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation project to Insituform Technologies for $151,025.80 and to authorize Bolton and Menk to perform design and construction oversight for a fee not to exceed $14,500. Exhibits A. Project Map B. Quote Summary C. Bolton and Menk Proposal. Item No.: 5 Date: May 9, 2022 Item Description: 2022 Sewer Rehabilitation Award (22-014) Presenter: Adam T. Edwards City Administrator/City Engineer Agenda Section: Consent Agenda Exhibit A. Exhibit B. Quote Summary Exhibit C. BMI Construction Services Proposal. AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: D. Goman Reviewed By: Approved By: 1.Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain Council approval of seasonal employees. 2.Background. The city employs seasonal employees to accomplish a variety of tasks. The hourly pay is proposed to be $14.00-$15.00 for the Golf Course Clubhouse Attendants, Brush Site Attendants, and Sledding Attendants; $14.00-$16.00 for Parks and Golf Course Maintenance Employees, $14.00-$18.00 for Utilities Maintenance Workers, $15.00-$20.00 for the Assistant Golf Course Superintendent, and $14.00 for Administrative Scan Clerk. Seasonal employees fall under the 6 month PERA Classification and are therefore excluded from PERA membership. 3.Seasonal Employee Appointments and Candidates. Name Position Wage (Per hour) Remarks Approved 01-10-2022 Bonnie Kaster Scan Clerk $14.00 Returnee Brian Torney Scan Clerk $14.00 Returnee Approved 02-14-2022 Mitchell Hall Asst. Superintendent $18.00 Returnee Alex Collins GC Maintenance $14.00 Returnee Lloyd Engler GC Maintenance $14.00 Returnee Barry Blievernicht Clubhouse Attendant $14.50 Returnee Marshall Hambro Clubhouse Attendant $14.50 Returnee Wendy Middendorf Clubhouse Attendant $14.50 Returnee Paul Tolzman Clubhouse Attendant $14.50 Returnee Steve Persian Clubhouse Attendant $14.00 New Hire Max Dailey Clubhouse Attendant $14.00 New Hire Zachary Conway Parks Maintenance $16.00 Returnee Approved 02-28-2022 Ron Steffenhagen GC Maintenance $16.00 Returnee Cal Schmidt GC Maintenance $16.00 Returnee Logan Reynolds Clubhouse Attendant $14.00 Returnee Approved 3-28-2022 Vicki Hines Brush site Attendant $14.50 Returnee Approved 4- 11-2022 Chris Fowke Clubhouse Attendant $14.00 New Hire Dennis Goneau Clubhouse Attendant $14.00 New Hire Jessica Olson Clubhouse Attendant $14.00 New Hire Requesting Approval 5-9-2022 Gavin Fabor Brush site Attendant $14.00 New Hire 4.Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval to hire of the seasonal employees in Table 3. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve hiring the seasonal employees as listed in the table above. Item No.: 6 Date: May 9, 2022 Item Description: Appointment of 2022 Seasonal Employees V6 Presenter: D.J. Goman Public Works Superintendent Agenda Section: Consent Agenda Prepared By: D.J.Goman Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: AGENDA ITEM 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain approval to hire a full-time public works maintenance worker. An opening exists for a full-time public works maintenance worker. 2. Background. The Public Works Department currently has 7 full time maintenance worker positions. The maintenance worker positions are critical to meet current service needs and are essential to City operations. 3. Recruitment. The selection process for the position involved advertising the position, application screening, and interviews. First round interviews are completed by a panel of public works supervisors and maintenance worker and second round practical exercise testing, background checking and interviews conducted by the Public Works and Parks / Golf Superintendents and first round staff. 4. Recommended Candidate. Ben Theisen has 12 years of private building and grounds and landscaping construction experience. Ben is excited about the opportunity to work for the Orono Public Works Department. 5. Recommended Compensation. I recommend to hire Ben Theisen as a full-time public works maintenance worker with an effective start date of May 10, 2022, and pending background check results. a. Salary. Starting rate of $25.77/hour (IUOE Local 49 Agreement pay scale). b. Benefits. As a full-time employee the position is eligible for benefits as outlined in the IOUE Local 49 Agreement and personnel handbook. This includes enrollment in the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA). COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the hiring of Ben Theisen as a full-time public works maintenance worker at the rate of $25.77 per hour with a start date of May 10, 2022. Item No.: 7 Date: April 10, 2022 Item Description: Request to Hiring Full-Time Public Works Maintenance Worker Presenter: D.J. Goman Superintendent of Public Works Agenda Section: Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: Reviewed By: Approved By: 1.Purpose. The purpose of this item is to gain Council approval to complete a Master Plan and Community Outreach for Summit Beach Park. 2.Background. The Summit Beach Committee met on March 4th, 2022 to establish a scope of work for a master plan including public outreach for Summit Beach. The committee expressed a desire for the work to be completed by a consultant. Staff solicited and received a proposal for our consulting engineering firm, Bolton and Menk for such a project. Over the past several years the City has undertaken several planning efforts and completed a number of improvement in and adjoining the park. (See Exhibit A and references) The master plan for Summit Beach is intended allow for near and long term improvements to be considered for the site for continued enjoyment by residents. The associated cost estimates will be used to inform priorities and funding sources to be planned and implemented as part of the City's capital improvement plan. 3.Scope of Work. This planning project has three main phases/components: a.Creation of Conceptual Plans. •Consolidate previous work and planning efforts for the park into conceptual plans. •Meet with Staff and Park Committee to review conceptual plans. b.Facilitate public engagement/ comment and review of conceptual plans. •Develop outreach materials. •Conduct open house, pop-up meetings and Online Survey. c.Prepare masterplan summary report, graphic and cost estimate. 4.Cost. Bolton and Menk has proposed a not to exceed fee of $19,500. (Exhibit B) 5.Funding. Funding will come from the Park Dedication Fund. 6.Park Commsion Recommendation. The Park Commison reviewed the proposal at their May 2nd meeting. They voted 5-1 to recommend approval of the project. 7.Impact to Other Parks Projects. The 2022 Parks Capital improvement Plan includes a playground for Summit beach in 2023. The playground project will be postponed until 2024 or beyond depending on the outcome of the master plan. 8.Timeline. The table below depicts the expected project timeline. When What May 23rd Council approves expenditure of fund and authorizes planning. Jun 1st–Jul 31st Conceptual Plans and Public Engagement Aug 1st Master Plan Draft Review ; Develop 2023 and beyond Parks CIP Sep 6th Master Plan Approval; 2023 and beyond Parks CIP Oct 10th Final Master Plan Acceptance; Approval of the 2023 and beyond Parks CIP COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Move to Approve the Master Plan project proposal for Summit Beach Park. Item No.: 8 Date: May 9, 2022 Item Description: Summit Beach Master Planning (Project 22-055) Presenter: Adam Edwards, P.E. City Administrator/Engineer Agenda Section: Consent Agenda Exhibits A. Summit Beach Vision Plan, 2020 B. Proposal from Bolton and Menk. References A. Topographic Survey of Park; Gronberg, 19 Mar 21 B. Summit Beach Vision Document; 18 Sep 20 C. Title Property Report; Land Title, 5 Aug 20 D. Wetland Investigation and Delineation Report; BMI Oct 17 E. Ravine Stabilization Plan Set; BMI 15 Mar 2018 F. Playground Concepts; Flagship/Landscape Structures, 15 Jun 21 G. Playground Concepts; Komplan/Ultimate, 21 Dec 21 H. Tree Inventory; 2018 I. East Long Lake Trail Master Plan; BMI, 2018 J. East Long Lake Trail Plan Set; BMI, 25 Jun 20 K. Public Comment; Various residents and non-residents (200+), 2019-2022 L. 2040 Community Plan; City or Orono, 2018 Pave Parking Lot Playground Picnic table Bench Porta Potty w/ surround Swim Bouys Swim Platform Canoe / Kayak racks Wetland area (approximate) Grass Open Area Picnic table Summit Beach Vision Site Plan Pave Parking Lot ~ 8400 ft sq Approx. 28 spots $ 43,400 Rain Garden If needed to manage parkign and street runnoff $ 2,000 Play Ground "Natural looking playground" $ 90,000 Gravel Path ~330ft long 4 ft wide $ 8,000 Picnic Table $2400 ea x 3 $ 7,200 Shade Sail $ 3325 ea x 3 $ 9,975 Bench $850 ea x 2 $ 1,700 Dock 32’ Dock for launching canoes and kayaks $ 4,500 Canoe Rack Add one for total of two racks storage for 12 $ 1,000 Porta Potty Surround Move to side of parking lot and screen with vegetation $ 2,000 Swim Platform 10x10 ? $ 5,000 174,775$ $ 43,694 $ 218,469 $ 21,847 $ 240,316 Total Estimated CostItemDescription Constructuion Total Design and administrative Costs (25%) Sub Total Contingency (10%) Notes: 1.Fence is existing and to be replace as part of scout project in 2020 2.Existing signs to be replaced. Entrance Sign and Information sign replacement will be done with East Long Lake Project. 3.Dead/dying trees will either be address as maintenance items or will be incidental to site prep for playground construction. Sign Location 1.Canoe launch area sign 2.Park Entrance Sign 3.Park Information Sign 4.Beach Rules/ Safety Warning Sign 1 2 3 4 As of 18SEP20 Rough Cost Estimate Disclaimers: This is intended to be a working document for city Staff and Park commission discussion and brainstorming. -It is not an approved plan for execution . -It is not to scale. -Locations and sizes are approximate. -Costs are rough order of magnitude planning estimates. C:\_Projects\Orono\Summit Beach Master Plan\Summit Beach Master Plan scope & fee 4-28-22.docx April 29, 2022 City of Orono Attn: Adam Edwards PO Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 RE: Summit Beach Master Plan – Design Services Dear Adam: Thank you for the opportunity to assist the City with the development of a simple master plan for Summit Beach Park, including a public engagement process. Project Understanding Summit Beach Park is located off East Long Lake Road on the southwest shore of Long Lake. Over the past several years the City has undertaken several planning efforts and completed a number of improvements in and adjoining the park. The master plan for Summit Beach is intended to allow for near and long-term improvements to be considered for the site for continued enjoyment by residents. The associated cost estimates will be used to inform priorities and funding sources to be planned and implemented as part of the City’s capital improvement plan. Proposed Scope of Services We propose to complete the following Summit Beach tasks: 1. Master Plan Development…………………………………………………..……………………..$5,300 • Create a site analysis graphic for the park • Create 2-3 conceptual plans for review with City Staff/Parks Commission • Consolidate previous work and planning efforts for the park in the conceptual plans • Meet with Staff /Park Committee to review conceptual plans • Create a preferred master plan concept based on input from City/Community Plan Deliverables: a. Site analysis graphic b. 2-3 conceptual plans with preliminary cost estimates c. Preferred master plan (rendered, scalable 22”x34”) 2. Public Engagement……………………………………………………………………………………$11,500 • Kick-off meeting with Staff, Park Committee to review approach, scope and goals for project • Anticipate working with City and Park Committee to create a public engagement schedule consisting of two (2) open houses at Summit Beach Park and a minimum of three (3) community events where team members can piggy-back on planned events to gather more diverse feedback • Develop an online survey for the project • Develop a QR code flier that provides a link to project information and survey • Facilitate two (2) meetings with the Parks Committee to establish general goals & discuss conceptual plans • Attend/Facilitate public open houses (up to two) • Attend pop-up meetings at Orono community events (minimum of 3) to inform and gather input Public Engagement Deliverables: a. Online survey & QR code link b. Meeting graphics and related materials c. Three (3) project meetings with Staff and Park Committee d. Attend/Facilitate two (2) public open houses @ Summit Beach Park e. Attend pop-up meeting (3 minimum) 3. Master Plan Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………$2,700 • Develop an executive summary and compile master planning material into a pdf documenting the master planning process for the park. This document will include all concepts developed, graphics and cost estimates developed during the project, along with the online survey data. Master Plan Summary Deliverables: a. Master Plan Executive Summary, documenting the master planning process, supporting graphics and cost estimate (pdf format) Preliminary Schedule a. 5/23/22 – Proposal Approval b. 6/1/22- 7/31/22 - Conceptual Plans & Public Engagement c. 8/1/22 – Draft Master Plan provide to Parks Commission d. 9/6/22 – Master Plan approved by Parks Commission e. 10/10/22 – Master Plan approved by City Council Fee Estimate Based on the scope of services described above, we propose a total not-to-exceed fee of $19,500 to be billed on an hourly basis. We look forward to collaborating with Orono to develop this Master Plan. Please let me know if you have questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. David P. Martini, P.E. Principal Engineer AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: J. Lemons Reviewed By: Approved By: 1.Purpose. The purpose of the action item is to designate Lake Access Points to be marked. 2.Background / Summary. The City has marked an unmarked lake access points that provide some recreational value to Orono residents. The Park Commission has developed a standard of how the access points should be marked in the future to designate usage. Having the access points marked clearly would allow for more use and clear boundary disputes. 3.Usage. All newly marked access points would be posted as pedestrian use only unless previously designated for other uses. 4.Access Point List. The Lake Access Point sub-committee of the Park Commission and City staff have identified the following access points to be marked in 2022. •#4- 3498/3510 North Shore Dr. at Baldur Park •#9- Gibbs Landing – Fox St. Adj. to 3125 •#11- 3580/3640 Bayside Rd at Stubbs Bay •#15- 607/649 Park Lane •#20- 1310 Spruce/1320 Cherry Pl •#22- 1098/1130 Loma Linda Ave •#28- 4711/4745 North Shore Dr. •#30- 1405/1410 Rest Point Rd •#32- 4156/4167 Highwood Rd •#37- 3195/3205 Casco Circle •#38- 3484/3508 Ivy Place 5.Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of Lake Access Point markings at recommended sites. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve 2022 Lake Access Point markings listed above. Exhibits A.Lake Access Point Map Item No.: 9 Date: May 9, 2022 Item Description: Lake Access Markings Presenter: Joshua Lemons Parks and Golf Superintendent Agenda Section: Consent Agenda Marker Post Example #* #* #* #* #* #*#*#* #* #* #*#*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #*#* #* #*#*#*#* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#*#* #*#* #*#*#*#* #* Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake L o n g L a k e C r e e k M i n n e h ahaCreek Pai n t e r C r e e k M i n n e h a h a C r eek Paint er C r e e k GVWX15 GVWX16 GVWX15 GVWX112 GVWX84 GVWX135 GVWX101 GVWX110 GVWX146 GVWX125 GVWX5 GVWX151GVWX19 GVWX6 GVWX19 GVWX101 GVWX6 GVWX51 %&'(394 %&'(494 )*12 )*12 ?@A@7 ST26 ST201 M i n n e t o n k a D r Minnetonka Blvd W o o d h i l l R o a d T hreePointsB l v d Lake St Extension Orcha rd Roa d Highland Ave LynwoodBl vd P e a v e y R o a d 6 t h Ave N Fe r n d a l e R o a d N Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 N Star k e y R o a d Rutledge Road 2 2 n d Ave N Co m m e r c e B l v d Highway 12 E 6 t h A v e N T o n k aw o od R o a d C o u n t y R o a d 1 0 1 In t e r s t a t e 4 9 4 Highw oo d D r N Arm Dr Wi l l i s t o n R o a d Azure Road B r o w n R o a d N S hor e line Dr Ferndale Road W 19th Ave N M a n o r R o a d O a kla n d R o adFerndaleRoad S Inte rsta te 394 Highway 7 8th Ave N NShore Dr StoneRoad Rice St E W atertownRoad G l e a so n L a k e D r C a r l s o n P k w y N 21 s t A v e N 3rdAve N Wayzata Bl vd E Wi l l o w D r N Bayside Road W a y zata B lv d W Ke lley P k w y Lakeview A v e County Road 151 Grays B a y B l v d Ra n c h v i e w L n N Lake Ave Daniels St Ma p l e w ood R o a d LakeStE P k w y 4th Ave N Av o n D r D e v on Dr P a r k Ave S Ln OrchardLn S h o r e w ood L n S t e e l e S t Park St E Grand Ave N o r t h e r n A ve Vine St Do v e L n 2 0 t h Ave N Co u n t y R o a d 8 3 9 t h A v e N Ridge v i e wDr E Ol d C r y s t a l B a y R o a d N Fox St OldLongL ake R o a d M i n n ehaha P l Day Pl H e r i t a g e L n Rai n b o w D r Lyric Ave W Branch R oad R i n ger R o a d Hu n t e r D r Wayzata Blvd Spring H i l l R o a d Temp l e Dr Arco l a L n C ou n t y R o a d 1 5 Crow n Dr E astw o o d R o a d 5 t h A v e N C h i m o W W i l d h u r s t Trl Moline Road Ta m a r a c k D r Wayza t a B l v d W T o go Roa d W Arm Dr R e g e n t s W a l k G a l e R o a d Pea v e y Ln C y g n e t P l Drake Dr Turner Road L i n w o o d Road K elly Ave McGintyRoadW M a n it o u R o a d WilshireBlvd C o u n t y R o a d 1 0 1 ShadywoodRoad G l e a s o n L a k e R o a d C r o s b y R o a d H a r b o r L n N Ba r t l e t t B lv d Hi g h l a n d R o a d Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Ol d C r y s t a l B a y R o a d S V i n e H i l l R o a d C a n terbu r y D r Donald D r L i n n e r R o a d Du n k i r k L n N W illo w D r S Le a f S t H o l d r i d g e Dr To n k a w a R o a d M c C u l l e y Ro a d C o unty R o a d 1 10N Vi c t o r i a S t B r o w n R o a d S I slan d V i e w D r EastmanLn Ni a g a r a L n N Ed g e w a t er D r Vi c k s b u r g L n N W P o i n t R o a d Lafa y ette R o a d B u s ha w a y R o a d W o o d h i l l R o a d L a k e view Pkwy Le r o y S t St u b b s B a y R o a d N Sussex D r Troy L n N H i l lside D r W 18thA v e N 2 1 34 5 6 7 8 9 10 111213 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 222324 2526 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 A B CD E FG HI 1A Ma p D o c u m e n t : \ \ A r c s e r v e r 1 \ G I S \ O R N O \ C 1 3 1 1 4 8 1 4 \ E S R I \ M a p s \ L a n d U s e \ O R N O _ 4 E - B _ L a k e A c c e s s P o i n t s _ 1 1 x 1 7 L . m x d | D a t e S a v e d : 1 1 / 9 / 2 0 1 8 3 : 2 7 : 4 4 P M 2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN November 2018Lake Access Points Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Lake Access Points #*Lake AccessPoints Map 4E-2 Proposed Markings AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: Reviewed By: Approved By: 1.Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to reject bids for the new public works facilitypProject and provide direction on a way forward. 2.Background. In May of 2021 the city began a design process for a new public works facility at 365 Old Crystal Bay Road. Design work was completed in April and the project put out for Bid with bid date of April 26th 2022. 3.Scope of Work. The project consists of the construction of a new public works facility with associated site work. 4.Cost. The city received seven bids. The bid Summary is at Exhibit A. The low bid for was for $18,382,000 from Rochon Cooperation. The low bid is significantly higher than the project estimate and funding. A bid analysis is included as part of Exhibit B. 5.Funding. The project is funded by a facility bond. A facility bond was sold in December of 2021 with $13,000,000 allocated for the PW facility. 6.Design Committee Recommendation. The design committee met on May 2nd to analysis the bids and develop a recommendation for a way forward. The committee recommends rejecting all bids and repackaging the project in to component parts (Site work, Facility, Commodity Yard) for rebid in the future. Timing of the rebid should be based on monitoring construction costs but with bid packets ready by August 2022. 7.Staff Recommendation. I council reject the bids as the costs exceed funding available. The project is not time sensitive so delaying to wait for market condition to improve makes sense. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Move to reject the bids received for the public works facility and to direct staff and consultants to prepare bid packages for rebid. Exhibits A.Bid Tab B.Oertel Architects Bid Review Letter. References A.Orono PW Bid Package Item No.: 10 Date: May 9, 2022 Item Description: Public Works Facility (21-039)- Bids Presenter: Adam T. Edwards, P.E. City Engineer Agenda Section: Consent Agenda Exhibit A: Bid Tab Mr. Adam Edwards, As you know, we experienced a high level of interest from bidders on this project. The QuestCDN plan holders list included (13) Prime Bidders and the project received (7) bids on bid day. The bid spread was relatively tight at $1,448,000. More importantly, the bottom two bidders were within $330,000 (1.8%) of each other. This bid spread, coupled with the total number of bids received, is a strong indicator that the low bidder was competitive, and that the true marketplace value was around $18,500,000 +/-. The construction industry is in a very unpredictable place right now. Both from a pricing and material availability standpoint. In discussions with various general contractors, the sub-contractor coverage on this project was good with a few exceptions. One notable example was the bid for the electrical scope. The general contractors were only able to secure 2-3 electrical contractor bids. I would expect this number to be in the 6-8 range, similar to the number of mechanical contractors who provided bids. The reasoning given by the electrical contractors for not bidding was a high volume of work, including several large infrastructure projects. Overall, the high impact bid numbers were as expected: Precast Concrete, Concrete/Masonry, Mechanical, Electrical, and Site Work. The apparent low base bid for your project has been identified as Rochon Corporation. Their base bid was $18,447,000. With the deduct alternates, the total is $18,382,000. Rochon has 85+ years of experience, 30-40 full-time employees, and approximate annual sales of $100 million. They are located in Osseo, MN. The contractor has provided us with their Responsible Contractor form per Minnesota Statute 16C.285, subdivision 3. Oertel Architects has completed several similar projects with Rochon, ranging in size and scope, over the last several years. The project is significantly over the City’s budget and available bonding money. My preliminary thoughts on moving forward include the following: 1. Delay the project The current marketplace is feeling the deep effects of worldwide inflation. Several larger construction firms have released data that indicate construction costs have risen by as much as 35% over the last 12 months. Inevitably, some of these costs will stabilize while others will continue to increase. In general, the predictive metrics point to costs not dipping significantly over the scope of a typical construction project. If the City chooses to re-bid the project, I would anticipate a slight increase in cost over the next 8-12 months followed by a more typical 4%-5% annual escalation factor in subsequent years. The delay and re-bid would allow the City to identify potential funding sources and to plan for the increased expenditure as part of the overall City budget. DATE: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 To: Adam Edwards, P.E., City Administrator/City Engineer City of Orono RE: Public Works Facility Bids Attachments: None 2. Reduce the scope of the project The other, more immediate timeline would involve reducing the scope of the overall project and re-bidding all or a portion of the work. In these types of situations, I strongly suggest building as much of the main building as possible as this is the most difficult and costly part to add later. Given that, the most obvious areas to reduce scope would be at the yard amenities on the west side of the site. This includes: -Work with Bolton Menk to identify cost savings within the site work (grading, utilities, paving, curb and gutter) - Eliminate the north and/or south storage bins - Eliminate the salt building from the current scope and bid a fabric style structure under a separate contract -Review the building design for potential cost savings at the canopy and exterior employee area For the above, I would set a target savings of $1.5 to $2 million dollars. To realize additional savings, we would need to start eliminating square foot area from the main building. As you know, being a member of the project team, we worked diligently to scrutinize our decisions in an attempt to “right size” the project throughout the design process. If we move forward with downsizing the building, I recommend eliminating the space from the Vehicle Storage area as this would be the easiest portion to find an alternate solution for later. Using the bid numbers available, it appears that the building cost per square foot is around $235. Industry standard for estimating potential savings is to use roughly 40% of the cost per square foot price. In this case, we would use $90-$95 per square foot to gauge the potential savings at Vehicle Storage and $175-$200 a square foot to gauge the potential savings at Vehicle Maintenance. The above (and attached) graphic above gives some indication of the different size footprints we would be start with. Unfortunately, this bidding climate is adversely affecting many public and private projects throughout the metro. A number of projects that were put on hold due to being over budget at the end of last year are bidding even higher this year. In several discussions with contractors about projects bidding this year, roughly 50% are choosing to move forward and 50% are choosing to utilize Option 1, 2, or some mixture of the two. Please know that the design team is committed to working through this process and please do not hesitate to call or email with any questions, thoughts, or concerns moving forward. Thank You, Thomas Stromsodt, AIA Oertel Architects AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: mcc Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: 1. Purpose. This application is regarding rear and side setback variances in order to construct additions to the existing home. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received and was considered to be complete on July 21st, 2021. The 60-Day review period has been extended and will now expire on July 16, 2022. 3. Background/ Summary. The Council reviewed this project in October last year and after discussion some Councilmembers expressed their opinion that the proposed expansions and increased encroachments were not supportable. The Council tabled the application at the applicant’s request. The applicant has provided a revised plan reflecting a proposed 3.5 foot side yard setback, where a 7.5 foot setback is required, in conjunction with rebuilding the detached garage with a 5.9 foot footprint addition to connect it to the home, including a second story. The existing garage is situated 1.2 feet from the lot line and is detached from the home. The revised plans move the entire garage to the south approximately 2.3 feet. They have indicated that they have moved the garage as far south as would be permitted without impacting the existing water supply well. The goal of the project is to reconfigure the main level to accommodate a half bath, and construct an additional bedroom/office and bathroom over the new garage to improve function and livability. The revised plan continues to maintain the existing 16 foot setback from the rear lot line where a 30-foot rear, and 7.5-foot side setback are required. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On September 20th, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. Following the public hearing the Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 on a motion to approve the original variances. 5. Public Comment. No new comments from the neighbors have been received. The neighbor acknowledgments from their original proposal are attached as Exhibit C. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the revised plan which offers a greater setback for building maintenance and stormwater distribution. The applicant should address the stormwater, with the building permit submittal, so that the property to the north is not adversely impacted. Item No.: 11 Date: May 9, 2022 Item Description: LA21-000051 – Robert Linden Construction, 1074 Loma Linda Avenue, Variances Presenter: Melanie Curtis Planner Agenda Section: Planning Department Report AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: mcc Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Direct Staff to draft a resolution reflecting your decision. Exhibits A. Revised Proposed Plans (including previous plan) B. Staff Annotated Revised Survey C. Council Minutes 10/11/2021 D. Neighbor Acknowledgments E. Council Staff Report 10/11/2021 References Council Memo & Exhibits 10/11/2021 PC Memo & Exhibits 9/20/2021 OF F I C E : ( 9 5 2 ) 7 4 6 - 7 7 0 2 | F A X : ( 9 5 2 ) 7 4 6 - 7 7 0 3 CE L L : ( 9 5 2 ) 9 9 4 - 6 6 8 2 | E - M A I L : m i k e b @ b e h r - d e s i g n . c o m SHEET NO. DA T E : DR A W N B Y : c 2 0 2 1 B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . TH I S D R A W I N G A N D D E S I G N L A Y O U T I S PR O T E C T E D U N D E R S T A T E A N D F E D E R A L CO P Y R I G H T L A W S . I T M A Y N O T B E RE P R O D U C E D O R U S E D F O R A N Y PU R P O S E W I T H O U T P R I O R W R I T T E N CO N S E N T F R O M B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . PR O J E C T # : B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . N O R I T S E M P L O Y E E S A S S U M E A N Y R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R V A R I O U S C O N S T R U C T I O N T E C H N I Q U E S A N D / O R Q U A L I T Y O F M A T E R I A LS AN D W O R K M A N S H I P . R E S I D E N T I A L D E S I G N E R S O R D R A F T S P E R S O N S A R E N O T E N G I N E E R S . B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . R E C O M M E N D S T H A T A Q U A L I F I E D , LIC E N S E D S T R U C T U R A L E N G I N E E R B E R E T A I N E D T O I N S U R E T H E S T R U C T U R AL I N T E G R I T Y O F A L L B U I L D I N G S . B E A M S A N D S T R U C T U R A L M E M B E R S SP E C I F I E D O N T H E S E P L A N S A R E F O R B I D P U R P O S E O N L Y A N D S H O U L D B E S I Z E D B Y T H E M A N U F A C T U R E R S E N G I N E E R I N G S T A F F A N D / O R A L I C E N S E D EN G I N E E R . S I Z E S O F M A T E R I A L S A N D P R O D U C T S S P E C I F I E D O N T H E S E P L A N S R E F L E C T A C C E P T E D I N D U S T R Y S T A N D A R D S A N D I N N O W A Y I N D I C A TE A SP E C I F I C M A N U F A C T U R E R , U N L E S S R E Q U E S T E D B Y T H E C L I E N T . I N T H E CA S E O F D O O R S A N D W I N D O W S , G E N E R I C S I Z E S A R E S P E C I F I E D U N L E S S N OT E D OT H E R W I S E A N D I T I S A S S U M E D T H A T T H E S U P P L I E R W I L L B I D A N D U S E TH E C L O S E S T S I Z E A V A I L A B L E . T H E G E N E R A L C O N T R A C T O R A N D / O R H O M E O W N E R S H A L L A S S U M E F U L L R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R T H E C H E C K I N G A N D V E R I F I C A T I O N O F D I M E N S I O N S , DE T A I L S , A N D N O T E S , A S W E L L A S C O N S T R U C T I O N T E C H N I Q U E S , S P E C I F I CA T I O N S , S T R U C T U R A L A N D / O R S A F E T Y R E Q U I R E M E N T S A N D C O N F O R M I T Y T O AL L F E D E R A L , S T A T E A N D L O C A L B U I L D I N G C O D E S , L A W S A N D O R D I N A N C E S. H O M E S W H I C H A R E T O B E C O N S T R U C T E D I N A R E A S T H A T A R E S U B JE C T TO E X T R A O R D I N A R Y S E I S M I C , W I N D , S N O W F A L L , C O L D O R F L O O D I S S U E S SH O U L D B E E N G I N E E R E D A N D I N S P E C T E D B Y A C O N S T R U C T I O N P R O F E S S I O N AL FA M I L I A R W I T H T H E P A R T I C U L A R C O N D I T I O N S O F T H A T R E G I O N . T H E S E P L A N S S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . , S H A L L N OT B E CO P I E D O R R E P R O D U C E D W I T H O U T T H E W R I T T E N C O N S E N T O F B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . O R T H E C L I E N T F O R W H I C H T H E Y W E R E P R E P A R E D F O R . A1 Ext Elevations Lu n d q u i s t R e s i d e n c e 10 7 4 L o m a L i n d a A v e Mo u n d , M N BD D 04 / 2 2 / 2 1 21 - 0 0 C L 1/4" 1'-0"A1 2LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 1/4" 1'-0"A1 1LAKESIDE ELEVATION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION (FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY) 12 14 12 8 MIDPOINT OF HIGHEST GABLE 8" / 1 2 " OF F I C E : ( 9 5 2 ) 7 4 6 - 7 7 0 2 | F A X : ( 9 5 2 ) 7 4 6 - 7 7 0 3 CE L L : ( 9 5 2 ) 9 9 4 - 6 6 8 2 | E - M A I L : m i k e b @ b e h r - d e s i g n . c o m SHEET NO. DA T E : DR A W N B Y : c 2 0 2 1 B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . TH I S D R A W I N G A N D D E S I G N L A Y O U T I S PR O T E C T E D U N D E R S T A T E A N D F E D E R A L CO P Y R I G H T L A W S . I T M A Y N O T B E RE P R O D U C E D O R U S E D F O R A N Y PU R P O S E W I T H O U T P R I O R W R I T T E N CO N S E N T F R O M B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . PR O J E C T # : B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . N O R I T S E M P L O Y E E S A S S U M E A N Y R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R V A R I O U S C O N S T R U C T I O N T E C H N I Q U E S A N D / O R Q U A L I T Y O F M A T E R I A LS AN D W O R K M A N S H I P . R E S I D E N T I A L D E S I G N E R S O R D R A F T S P E R S O N S A R E N O T E N G I N E E R S . B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . R E C O M M E N D S T H A T A Q U A L I F I E D , LIC E N S E D S T R U C T U R A L E N G I N E E R B E R E T A I N E D T O I N S U R E T H E S T R U C T U R AL I N T E G R I T Y O F A L L B U I L D I N G S . B E A M S A N D S T R U C T U R A L M E M B E R S SP E C I F I E D O N T H E S E P L A N S A R E F O R B I D P U R P O S E O N L Y A N D S H O U L D B E S I Z E D B Y T H E M A N U F A C T U R E R S E N G I N E E R I N G S T A F F A N D / O R A L I C E N S E D EN G I N E E R . S I Z E S O F M A T E R I A L S A N D P R O D U C T S S P E C I F I E D O N T H E S E P L A N S R E F L E C T A C C E P T E D I N D U S T R Y S T A N D A R D S A N D I N N O W A Y I N D I C A TE A SP E C I F I C M A N U F A C T U R E R , U N L E S S R E Q U E S T E D B Y T H E C L I E N T . I N T H E CA S E O F D O O R S A N D W I N D O W S , G E N E R I C S I Z E S A R E S P E C I F I E D U N L E S S N OT E D OT H E R W I S E A N D I T I S A S S U M E D T H A T T H E S U P P L I E R W I L L B I D A N D U S E TH E C L O S E S T S I Z E A V A I L A B L E . T H E G E N E R A L C O N T R A C T O R A N D / O R H O M E O W N E R S H A L L A S S U M E F U L L R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R T H E C H E C K I N G A N D V E R I F I C A T I O N O F D I M E N S I O N S , DE T A I L S , A N D N O T E S , A S W E L L A S C O N S T R U C T I O N T E C H N I Q U E S , S P E C I F I CA T I O N S , S T R U C T U R A L A N D / O R S A F E T Y R E Q U I R E M E N T S A N D C O N F O R M I T Y T O AL L F E D E R A L , S T A T E A N D L O C A L B U I L D I N G C O D E S , L A W S A N D O R D I N A N C E S. H O M E S W H I C H A R E T O B E C O N S T R U C T E D I N A R E A S T H A T A R E S U B JE C T TO E X T R A O R D I N A R Y S E I S M I C , W I N D , S N O W F A L L , C O L D O R F L O O D I S S U E S SH O U L D B E E N G I N E E R E D A N D I N S P E C T E D B Y A C O N S T R U C T I O N P R O F E S S I O N AL FA M I L I A R W I T H T H E P A R T I C U L A R C O N D I T I O N S O F T H A T R E G I O N . T H E S E P L A N S S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . , S H A L L N OT B E CO P I E D O R R E P R O D U C E D W I T H O U T T H E W R I T T E N C O N S E N T O F B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . O R T H E C L I E N T F O R W H I C H T H E Y W E R E P R E P A R E D F O R . A2 Ext Elevations Lu n d q u i s t R e s i d e n c e 10 7 4 L o m a L i n d a A v e Mo u n d , M N Au t h o r 04 / 2 2 / 2 1 21 - 0 0 C L 1/4" 1'-0"A2 1STREETSIDE ELEVATION 1/4" 1'-0"A2 2RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION (FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY) UP 11 ' - 6 3 / 4 " 20'-8 1/4" 9' - 2 3 / 4 " 20'-0 1/4" 3' - 1 0 " 11 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 4'-10" 3'-6 1/2" 24'-0" 22 ' - 3 " 5' - 1 1 1 / 2 " LINE OF NEW ADDITION LINE OF NEW ADDITION 8'-9 5/8" 10'-4 3/4" PR O P E R T Y L I N E BS B L 10'-0" OL D B S B L NE W B S B L PR O P E R T Y L I N E EXIST'G WELL ROOM BELOW LINE OF FRONT OF EXIST'G GARAGE TO BE REPLACED KITCHEN EDGE OF EXIST'G HOUSE LINE OF BACK OF EXIST'G GARAGE TO BE REPLACED 1 STEP UP 1 STEP UP 1 STEP UP FUTURE POWDER N 3'-3 1/4" B/ I C A B I N E T S OF F I C E : ( 9 5 2 ) 7 4 6 - 7 7 0 2 | F A X : ( 9 5 2 ) 7 4 6 - 7 7 0 3 CE L L : ( 9 5 2 ) 9 9 4 - 6 6 8 2 | E - M A I L : m i k e b @ b e h r - d e s i g n . c o m SHEET NO. DA T E : DR A W N B Y : c 2 0 2 1 B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . TH I S D R A W I N G A N D D E S I G N L A Y O U T I S PR O T E C T E D U N D E R S T A T E A N D F E D E R A L CO P Y R I G H T L A W S . I T M A Y N O T B E RE P R O D U C E D O R U S E D F O R A N Y PU R P O S E W I T H O U T P R I O R W R I T T E N CO N S E N T F R O M B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . PR O J E C T # : B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . N O R I T S E M P L O Y E E S A S S U M E A N Y R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R V A R I O U S C O N S T R U C T I O N T E C H N I Q U E S A N D / O R Q U A L I T Y O F M A T E R I A LS AN D W O R K M A N S H I P . R E S I D E N T I A L D E S I G N E R S O R D R A F T S P E R S O N S A R E N O T E N G I N E E R S . B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . R E C O M M E N D S T H A T A Q U A L I F I E D , LIC E N S E D S T R U C T U R A L E N G I N E E R B E R E T A I N E D T O I N S U R E T H E S T R U C T U R AL I N T E G R I T Y O F A L L B U I L D I N G S . B E A M S A N D S T R U C T U R A L M E M B E R S SP E C I F I E D O N T H E S E P L A N S A R E F O R B I D P U R P O S E O N L Y A N D S H O U L D B E S I Z E D B Y T H E M A N U F A C T U R E R S E N G I N E E R I N G S T A F F A N D / O R A L I C E N S E D EN G I N E E R . S I Z E S O F M A T E R I A L S A N D P R O D U C T S S P E C I F I E D O N T H E S E P L A N S R E F L E C T A C C E P T E D I N D U S T R Y S T A N D A R D S A N D I N N O W A Y I N D I C A TE A SP E C I F I C M A N U F A C T U R E R , U N L E S S R E Q U E S T E D B Y T H E C L I E N T . I N T H E CA S E O F D O O R S A N D W I N D O W S , G E N E R I C S I Z E S A R E S P E C I F I E D U N L E S S N OT E D OT H E R W I S E A N D I T I S A S S U M E D T H A T T H E S U P P L I E R W I L L B I D A N D U S E TH E C L O S E S T S I Z E A V A I L A B L E . T H E G E N E R A L C O N T R A C T O R A N D / O R H O M E O W N E R S H A L L A S S U M E F U L L R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R T H E C H E C K I N G A N D V E R I F I C A T I O N O F D I M E N S I O N S , DE T A I L S , A N D N O T E S , A S W E L L A S C O N S T R U C T I O N T E C H N I Q U E S , S P E C I F I CA T I O N S , S T R U C T U R A L A N D / O R S A F E T Y R E Q U I R E M E N T S A N D C O N F O R M I T Y T O AL L F E D E R A L , S T A T E A N D L O C A L B U I L D I N G C O D E S , L A W S A N D O R D I N A N C E S. H O M E S W H I C H A R E T O B E C O N S T R U C T E D I N A R E A S T H A T A R E S U B JE C T TO E X T R A O R D I N A R Y S E I S M I C , W I N D , S N O W F A L L , C O L D O R F L O O D I S S U E S SH O U L D B E E N G I N E E R E D A N D I N S P E C T E D B Y A C O N S T R U C T I O N P R O F E S S I O N AL FA M I L I A R W I T H T H E P A R T I C U L A R C O N D I T I O N S O F T H A T R E G I O N . T H E S E P L A N S S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . , S H A L L N OT B E CO P I E D O R R E P R O D U C E D W I T H O U T T H E W R I T T E N C O N S E N T O F B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . O R T H E C L I E N T F O R W H I C H T H E Y W E R E P R E P A R E D F O R . A3 Main Floor Plan Lu n d q u i s t R e s i d e n c e 10 7 4 L o m a L i n d a A v e Mo u n d , M N Au t h o r 04 / 2 2 / 2 1 21 - 0 0 C L 1/4" 1'-0"A3 1MAIN FLOOR PLAN NOTES: 1.) ALL BRG. HEADERS ARE TO BE (2)-2x10 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE (UNO). 2.) OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL WINDOW & DOOR SIZES. 3.) OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO SPEC. ALL FLOORING MATERIAL. 4.) OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS. 5.) ALL BRG WALL WINDOW & DOOR OPNG'S WIDER THAN 60" REQUIRE (2) TRIMMERS MIN. UNDER EA. SIDE OF HEADER. 6.) (FL) - FLUSH BEAM, (DR) DROPPED BEAM 7.) ALL HEADERS ARE DROPPED UNLESS NOTED (FL) 8.) USE ENERGY HEEL HEIGHT ON ROOF TRUSSES. 1/4" 1'-0"A3 2 PROPOSED MAIN FLOOR PLAN UP 24'-0 1/2" 5'-3 1/4" 12'-7 3/4"16 ' - 8 3 / 4 " 6'-9 3/4" 1'-2" 2'-7 1/2"2'-7 1/2" 3" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-5 3/4" 3 1/2" 5' - 0 " 2'-5 3/4" 2' - 1 3 / 4 " 1' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 7' - 1 " 4'-10 1/4" 4'-9 3/4" 7 1/2" 3'-0 1/4" 10'-0" 11 ' - 2 1 / 4 " 1'-5 1/4" 8'-7" 14" / 12"14" / 12" 4" / 1 2 " 16" / 12"16" / 12" 10 " / 1 2 " 24'-0 1/2" 3'-0" 4'-9 3/4" BEDROOM 7' - 0 " 7' - 0 " 14 ' - 7 1 / 4 " MECH. BATHROOM 24'-0 1/8" 28 ' - 7 1 / 4 " 6' - 9 3 / 4 " 14 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 6' - 9 3 / 4 " 28 ' - 7 1 / 4 " 3'-10 3/4"16'-1 3/4"3'-11 5/8" OF F I C E : ( 9 5 2 ) 7 4 6 - 7 7 0 2 | F A X : ( 9 5 2 ) 7 4 6 - 7 7 0 3 CE L L : ( 9 5 2 ) 9 9 4 - 6 6 8 2 | E - M A I L : m i k e b @ b e h r - d e s i g n . c o m SHEET NO. DA T E : DR A W N B Y : c 2 0 2 1 B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . TH I S D R A W I N G A N D D E S I G N L A Y O U T I S PR O T E C T E D U N D E R S T A T E A N D F E D E R A L CO P Y R I G H T L A W S . I T M A Y N O T B E RE P R O D U C E D O R U S E D F O R A N Y PU R P O S E W I T H O U T P R I O R W R I T T E N CO N S E N T F R O M B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . PR O J E C T # : B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . N O R I T S E M P L O Y E E S A S S U M E A N Y R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R V A R I O U S C O N S T R U C T I O N T E C H N I Q U E S A N D / O R Q U A L I T Y O F M A T E R I A LS AN D W O R K M A N S H I P . R E S I D E N T I A L D E S I G N E R S O R D R A F T S P E R S O N S A R E N O T E N G I N E E R S . B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . R E C O M M E N D S T H A T A Q U A L I F I E D , LIC E N S E D S T R U C T U R A L E N G I N E E R B E R E T A I N E D T O I N S U R E T H E S T R U C T U R AL I N T E G R I T Y O F A L L B U I L D I N G S . B E A M S A N D S T R U C T U R A L M E M B E R S SP E C I F I E D O N T H E S E P L A N S A R E F O R B I D P U R P O S E O N L Y A N D S H O U L D B E S I Z E D B Y T H E M A N U F A C T U R E R S E N G I N E E R I N G S T A F F A N D / O R A L I C E N S E D EN G I N E E R . S I Z E S O F M A T E R I A L S A N D P R O D U C T S S P E C I F I E D O N T H E S E P L A N S R E F L E C T A C C E P T E D I N D U S T R Y S T A N D A R D S A N D I N N O W A Y I N D I C A TE A SP E C I F I C M A N U F A C T U R E R , U N L E S S R E Q U E S T E D B Y T H E C L I E N T . I N T H E CA S E O F D O O R S A N D W I N D O W S , G E N E R I C S I Z E S A R E S P E C I F I E D U N L E S S N OT E D OT H E R W I S E A N D I T I S A S S U M E D T H A T T H E S U P P L I E R W I L L B I D A N D U S E TH E C L O S E S T S I Z E A V A I L A B L E . T H E G E N E R A L C O N T R A C T O R A N D / O R H O M E O W N E R S H A L L A S S U M E F U L L R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R T H E C H E C K I N G A N D V E R I F I C A T I O N O F D I M E N S I O N S , DE T A I L S , A N D N O T E S , A S W E L L A S C O N S T R U C T I O N T E C H N I Q U E S , S P E C I F I CA T I O N S , S T R U C T U R A L A N D / O R S A F E T Y R E Q U I R E M E N T S A N D C O N F O R M I T Y T O AL L F E D E R A L , S T A T E A N D L O C A L B U I L D I N G C O D E S , L A W S A N D O R D I N A N C E S. H O M E S W H I C H A R E T O B E C O N S T R U C T E D I N A R E A S T H A T A R E S U B JE C T TO E X T R A O R D I N A R Y S E I S M I C , W I N D , S N O W F A L L , C O L D O R F L O O D I S S U E S SH O U L D B E E N G I N E E R E D A N D I N S P E C T E D B Y A C O N S T R U C T I O N P R O F E S S I O N AL FA M I L I A R W I T H T H E P A R T I C U L A R C O N D I T I O N S O F T H A T R E G I O N . T H E S E P L A N S S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . , S H A L L N OT B E CO P I E D O R R E P R O D U C E D W I T H O U T T H E W R I T T E N C O N S E N T O F B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . O R T H E C L I E N T F O R W H I C H T H E Y W E R E P R E P A R E D F O R . A4 Upper Floor Plan Lu n d q u i s t R e s i d e n c e 10 7 4 L o m a L i n d a A v e Mo u n d , M N BD D 04 / 2 2 / 2 1 21 - 0 0 C L 1/4" 1'-0"A4 1UPPER FLOOR PLAN NOTES: 1.) ALL BRG. HEADERS ARE TO BE (2)-2x10 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE (UNO). 2.) OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL WINDOW & DOOR SIZES. 3.) OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO SPEC. ALL FLOORING MATERIAL. 4.) OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS. 5.) ALL BRG WALL WINDOW & DOOR OPNG'S WIDER THAN 60" REQUIRE (2) TRIMMERS MIN. UNDER EA. SIDE OF HEADER. 6.) (FL) - FLUSH BEAM, (DR) DROPPED BEAM 7.) ALL HEADERS ARE DROPPED UNLESS NOTED (FL) 8.) USE ENERGY HEEL HEIGHT ON ROOF TRUSSES. 1/8" 1'-0"A4 3Roof Plan 1/4" 1'-0"A4 2 PROPOSED UPPER FLOOR PLAN Main Level Floor 1' - 1 1/2" Garage Floor 1' - 5 1/8" Bonus Rm Floor 10' - 11 7/8" Garage Lvl Clg 9' - 5 1/8" 8'- 0 " Level 21 18' - 11 7/8" 8'- 0 " 9' - 6 3 / 4 " OF F I C E : ( 9 5 2 ) 7 4 6 - 7 7 0 2 | F A X : ( 9 5 2 ) 7 4 6 - 7 7 0 3 CE L L : ( 9 5 2 ) 9 9 4 - 6 6 8 2 | E - M A I L : m i k e b @ b e h r - d e s i g n . c o m SHEET NO. DA T E : DR A W N B Y : c 2 0 2 1 B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . TH I S D R A W I N G A N D D E S I G N L A Y O U T I S PR O T E C T E D U N D E R S T A T E A N D F E D E R A L CO P Y R I G H T L A W S . I T M A Y N O T B E RE P R O D U C E D O R U S E D F O R A N Y PU R P O S E W I T H O U T P R I O R W R I T T E N CO N S E N T F R O M B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . PR O J E C T # : B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . N O R I T S E M P L O Y E E S A S S U M E A N Y R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R V A R I O U S C O N S T R U C T I O N T E C H N I Q U E S A N D / O R Q U A L I T Y O F M A T E R I A LS AN D W O R K M A N S H I P . R E S I D E N T I A L D E S I G N E R S O R D R A F T S P E R S O N S A R E N O T E N G I N E E R S . B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . R E C O M M E N D S T H A T A Q U A L I F I E D , LIC E N S E D S T R U C T U R A L E N G I N E E R B E R E T A I N E D T O I N S U R E T H E S T R U C T U R AL I N T E G R I T Y O F A L L B U I L D I N G S . B E A M S A N D S T R U C T U R A L M E M B E R S SP E C I F I E D O N T H E S E P L A N S A R E F O R B I D P U R P O S E O N L Y A N D S H O U L D B E S I Z E D B Y T H E M A N U F A C T U R E R S E N G I N E E R I N G S T A F F A N D / O R A L I C E N S E D EN G I N E E R . S I Z E S O F M A T E R I A L S A N D P R O D U C T S S P E C I F I E D O N T H E S E P L A N S R E F L E C T A C C E P T E D I N D U S T R Y S T A N D A R D S A N D I N N O W A Y I N D I C A TE A SP E C I F I C M A N U F A C T U R E R , U N L E S S R E Q U E S T E D B Y T H E C L I E N T . I N T H E CA S E O F D O O R S A N D W I N D O W S , G E N E R I C S I Z E S A R E S P E C I F I E D U N L E S S N OT E D OT H E R W I S E A N D I T I S A S S U M E D T H A T T H E S U P P L I E R W I L L B I D A N D U S E TH E C L O S E S T S I Z E A V A I L A B L E . T H E G E N E R A L C O N T R A C T O R A N D / O R H O M E O W N E R S H A L L A S S U M E F U L L R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R T H E C H E C K I N G A N D V E R I F I C A T I O N O F D I M E N S I O N S , DE T A I L S , A N D N O T E S , A S W E L L A S C O N S T R U C T I O N T E C H N I Q U E S , S P E C I F I CA T I O N S , S T R U C T U R A L A N D / O R S A F E T Y R E Q U I R E M E N T S A N D C O N F O R M I T Y T O AL L F E D E R A L , S T A T E A N D L O C A L B U I L D I N G C O D E S , L A W S A N D O R D I N A N C E S. H O M E S W H I C H A R E T O B E C O N S T R U C T E D I N A R E A S T H A T A R E S U B JE C T TO E X T R A O R D I N A R Y S E I S M I C , W I N D , S N O W F A L L , C O L D O R F L O O D I S S U E S SH O U L D B E E N G I N E E R E D A N D I N S P E C T E D B Y A C O N S T R U C T I O N P R O F E S S I O N AL FA M I L I A R W I T H T H E P A R T I C U L A R C O N D I T I O N S O F T H A T R E G I O N . T H E S E P L A N S S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . , S H A L L N OT B E CO P I E D O R R E P R O D U C E D W I T H O U T T H E W R I T T E N C O N S E N T O F B E H R D E S I G N , I N C . O R T H E C L I E N T F O R W H I C H T H E Y W E R E P R E P A R E D F O R . A5 Building Sections Lu n d q u i s t R e s i d e n c e 10 7 4 L o m a L i n d a A v e Mo u n d , M N Au t h o r 04 / 2 2 / 2 1 21 - 0 0 C L 3/8" 1'-0"A5 1Section @ STAIRS OFFICE: (952) 746-7702 | FAX: (952) 746-7703 CELL: (952) 994-6682 | E-MAIL: mikeb@behr-design.com SHEET NO.DATE:DRAWN BY:c 2021 BEHR DESIGN, INC.THIS DRAWING AND DESIGN LAYOUT IS PROTECTED UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS. IT MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT FROM BEHR DESIGN, INC.PROJECT #: BEHR DESIGN, INC. NOR ITS EMPLOYEES ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR VARIOUS CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES AND/OR QUALITY OF MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP. RESIDENTIAL DESIGNERS OR DRAFTSPERSONS ARE NOT ENGINEERS. BEHR DESIGN, INC. RECOMMENDS THAT A QUALIFIED,LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER BE RETAINED TO INSURE THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF ALL BUILDINGS. BEAMS AND STRUCTURAL MEMBERS SPECIFIED ON THESE PLANS ARE FOR BID PURPOSE ONLY AND SHOULD BE SIZED BY THE MANUFACTURERS ENGINEERING STAFF AND/OR A LICENSED ENGINEER. SIZES OF MATERIALS AND PRODUCTS SPECIFIED ON THESE PLANS REFLECT ACCEPTED INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND IN NO WAY INDICATE A SPECIFIC MANUFACTURER, UNLESS REQUESTED BY THE CLIENT. IN THE CASE OF DOORS AND WINDOWS, GENERIC SIZES ARE SPECIFIED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE AND IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE SUPPLIER WILL BID AND USE THE CLOSEST SIZE AVAILABLE. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND/OR HOMEOWNER SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CHECKING AND VERIFICATION OF DIMENSIONS, DETAILS, AND NOTES, AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES, SPECIFICATIONS, STRUCTURAL AND/OR SAFETY REQUIREMENTS AND CONFORMITY TO ALL FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL BUILDING CODES, LAWS AND ORDINANCES. HOMES WHICH ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN AREAS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO EXTRAORDINARY SEISMIC, WIND, SNOWFALL, COLD OR FLOOD ISSUES SHOULD BE ENGINEERED AND INSPECTED BY A CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL FAMILIAR WITH THE PARTICULAR CONDITIONS OF THAT REGION. THESE PLANS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF BEHR DESIGN, INC., SHALL NOT BE COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF BEHR DESIGN, INC. OR THE CLIENT FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED FOR.A1 Ext ElevationsLundquist Residence 1074 Loma Linda Ave Mound, MN BDD 8/16/21 21-00CL 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " A12 LE F T S I D E E L E V A T I O N 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " A11 LA K E S I D E E L E V A T I O N PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION (FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY) 12 14 1 7 ' - 1 0 1 / 4 " MID P O I N T O F H I G H E S T G A B L E 7 ' - 0 " OFFICE: (952) 746-7702 | FAX: (952) 746-7703 CELL: (952) 994-6682 | E-MAIL: mikeb@behr-design.com SHEET NO.DATE:DRAWN BY:c 2021 BEHR DESIGN, INC.THIS DRAWING AND DESIGN LAYOUT IS PROTECTED UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS. IT MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT FROM BEHR DESIGN, INC.PROJECT #: BEHR DESIGN, INC. NOR ITS EMPLOYEES ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR VARIOUS CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES AND/OR QUALITY OF MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP. RESIDENTIAL DESIGNERS OR DRAFTSPERSONS ARE NOT ENGINEERS. BEHR DESIGN, INC. RECOMMENDS THAT A QUALIFIED,LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER BE RETAINED TO INSURE THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF ALL BUILDINGS. BEAMS AND STRUCTURAL MEMBERS SPECIFIED ON THESE PLANS ARE FOR BID PURPOSE ONLY AND SHOULD BE SIZED BY THE MANUFACTURERS ENGINEERING STAFF AND/OR A LICENSED ENGINEER. SIZES OF MATERIALS AND PRODUCTS SPECIFIED ON THESE PLANS REFLECT ACCEPTED INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND IN NO WAY INDICATE A SPECIFIC MANUFACTURER, UNLESS REQUESTED BY THE CLIENT. IN THE CASE OF DOORS AND WINDOWS, GENERIC SIZES ARE SPECIFIED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE AND IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE SUPPLIER WILL BID AND USE THE CLOSEST SIZE AVAILABLE. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND/OR HOMEOWNER SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CHECKING AND VERIFICATION OF DIMENSIONS, DETAILS, AND NOTES, AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES, SPECIFICATIONS, STRUCTURAL AND/OR SAFETY REQUIREMENTS AND CONFORMITY TO ALL FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL BUILDING CODES, LAWS AND ORDINANCES. HOMES WHICH ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN AREAS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO EXTRAORDINARY SEISMIC, WIND, SNOWFALL, COLD OR FLOOD ISSUES SHOULD BE ENGINEERED AND INSPECTED BY A CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL FAMILIAR WITH THE PARTICULAR CONDITIONS OF THAT REGION. THESE PLANS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF BEHR DESIGN, INC., SHALL NOT BE COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF BEHR DESIGN, INC. OR THE CLIENT FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED FOR.A2 Ext ElevationsLundquist Residence 1074 Loma Linda Ave Mound, MN Author 8/16/21 21-00CL 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " A21 ST R E E T S I D E E L E V A T I O N 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " A22 RI G H T S I D E E L E V A T I O N PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION (FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY) UP UP 1 1 ' - 6 3 / 4 " 20 ' - 8 1 / 4 " 9 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 20 ' - 0 1 / 4 " 11 ' - 1 3 / 4 " 7' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 3 ' - 1 0 " 1 1 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 4'- 1 0 " 3' - 6 1 / 2 " 24 ' - 0 " 2 2 ' - 3 " 5 ' - 1 1 1 / 2 " LIN E O F N E W A D D I T I O N LIN E O F N E W A D D I T I O N 8' - 9 5 / 8 " 10'-4 3/4" P R O P E R T Y L I N E B S B L 10'-0"OLD BSBL NEW BSBL PROPERTY LINE EX I S T ' G W E L L R O O M B E L O W 9'-2 7/8"1'-2 3/8"28'-7 1/4"24'-0" 2 8 ' - 7 1 / 4 " LIN E O F F R O N T O F EX I S T ' G G A R A G E T O BE R E P L A C E D KI T C H E N ED G E O F E X I S T ' G H O U S E 5 ' - 1 1 1 / 2 " LIN E O F B A C K O F EX I S T ' G G A R A G E T O BE R E P L A C E D 2 1 ' - 2 " 19'-2 3/4" 1 S T E P U P 1 S T E P U P 1 STEP UP 2'-8" W A L L H T UN D E R S T A I R FU T U R E PO W D E R OFFICE: (952) 746-7702 | FAX: (952) 746-7703 CELL: (952) 994-6682 | E-MAIL: mikeb@behr-design.com SHEET NO.DATE:DRAWN BY:c 2021 BEHR DESIGN, INC.THIS DRAWING AND DESIGN LAYOUT IS PROTECTED UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS. IT MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT FROM BEHR DESIGN, INC.PROJECT #: BEHR DESIGN, INC. NOR ITS EMPLOYEES ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR VARIOUS CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES AND/OR QUALITY OF MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP. RESIDENTIAL DESIGNERS OR DRAFTSPERSONS ARE NOT ENGINEERS. BEHR DESIGN, INC. RECOMMENDS THAT A QUALIFIED,LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER BE RETAINED TO INSURE THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF ALL BUILDINGS. BEAMS AND STRUCTURAL MEMBERS SPECIFIED ON THESE PLANS ARE FOR BID PURPOSE ONLY AND SHOULD BE SIZED BY THE MANUFACTURERS ENGINEERING STAFF AND/OR A LICENSED ENGINEER. SIZES OF MATERIALS AND PRODUCTS SPECIFIED ON THESE PLANS REFLECT ACCEPTED INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND IN NO WAY INDICATE A SPECIFIC MANUFACTURER, UNLESS REQUESTED BY THE CLIENT. IN THE CASE OF DOORS AND WINDOWS, GENERIC SIZES ARE SPECIFIED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE AND IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE SUPPLIER WILL BID AND USE THE CLOSEST SIZE AVAILABLE. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND/OR HOMEOWNER SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CHECKING AND VERIFICATION OF DIMENSIONS, DETAILS, AND NOTES, AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES, SPECIFICATIONS, STRUCTURAL AND/OR SAFETY REQUIREMENTS AND CONFORMITY TO ALL FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL BUILDING CODES, LAWS AND ORDINANCES. HOMES WHICH ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN AREAS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO EXTRAORDINARY SEISMIC, WIND, SNOWFALL, COLD OR FLOOD ISSUES SHOULD BE ENGINEERED AND INSPECTED BY A CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL FAMILIAR WITH THE PARTICULAR CONDITIONS OF THAT REGION. THESE PLANS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF BEHR DESIGN, INC., SHALL NOT BE COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF BEHR DESIGN, INC. OR THE CLIENT FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED FOR.A3 Main Floor PlanLundquist Residence 1074 Loma Linda Ave Mound, MN Author 8/16/21 21-00CL 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " A31 MA I N F L O O R P L A N NOTES:1.) ALL BRG. HEADERS ARE TO BE (2)-2x10 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE (UNO).2.) OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL WINDOW & DOOR SIZES.3.) OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO SPEC. ALL FLOORING MATERIAL.4.) OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS.5.) ALL BRG WALL WINDOW & DOOR OPNG'S WIDER THAN 60" REQUIRE (2) TRIMMERS MIN. UNDER EA. SIDE OF HEADER.6.) (FL) - F L U S H B E A M , ( D R ) D R O P P E D B E A M 7.) ALL HEADERS ARE DROPPED UNLESS NOTED (FL)8.) USE ENERGY HEEL HEIGHT ON ROOF TRUSSES. 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " A32 PR O P O S E D M A I N F L O O R P L A N UP 24 ' - 0 1 / 2 " 5' - 3 1 / 4 " 12 ' - 7 3 / 4 " 1 6 ' - 8 3 / 4 " 6'- 9 3 / 4 " 1' - 2 " 2' - 7 1 / 2 " 2'- 7 1 / 2 " 3 " 3' - 0 " 3' - 0 " 3' - 5 3 / 4 " 3 1 / 2 " 5 ' - 0 " 2'- 5 3 / 4 " 2 ' - 1 3 / 4 " 1 ' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 7 ' - 1 " 4' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 4' - 9 3 / 4 " 7 1 / 2 " 3'- 0 1 / 4 " 10 ' - 0 " 1 1 ' - 2 1 / 4 " 1' - 5 1 / 4 " 8'- 7 " 7'-0"ACCESS MECH. VIA LADDERGUESTBEDROOMGUEST BATH MECH. 14 " / 1 2 " 14 " / 1 2 " 4 " / 1 2 " 16 " / 1 2 " 16 " / 1 2 " 1 0 " / 1 2 " 6" / 1 2 " 14 " / 1 2 " 14 " / 1 2 " 1 0 " / 1 2 " 1 0 " / 1 2 " 1 6 " / 1 2 " 1 6 " / 1 2 " 1 6 " / 1 2 " 1 6 " / 1 2 " OFFICE: (952) 746-7702 | FAX: (952) 746-7703 CELL: (952) 994-6682 | E-MAIL: mikeb@behr-design.com SHEET NO.DATE:DRAWN BY:c 2021 BEHR DESIGN, INC.THIS DRAWING AND DESIGN LAYOUT IS PROTECTED UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS. IT MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT FROM BEHR DESIGN, INC.PROJECT #: BEHR DESIGN, INC. NOR ITS EMPLOYEES ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR VARIOUS CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES AND/OR QUALITY OF MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP. RESIDENTIAL DESIGNERS OR DRAFTSPERSONS ARE NOT ENGINEERS. BEHR DESIGN, INC. RECOMMENDS THAT A QUALIFIED,LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER BE RETAINED TO INSURE THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF ALL BUILDINGS. BEAMS AND STRUCTURAL MEMBERS SPECIFIED ON THESE PLANS ARE FOR BID PURPOSE ONLY AND SHOULD BE SIZED BY THE MANUFACTURERS ENGINEERING STAFF AND/OR A LICENSED ENGINEER. SIZES OF MATERIALS AND PRODUCTS SPECIFIED ON THESE PLANS REFLECT ACCEPTED INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND IN NO WAY INDICATE A SPECIFIC MANUFACTURER, UNLESS REQUESTED BY THE CLIENT. IN THE CASE OF DOORS AND WINDOWS, GENERIC SIZES ARE SPECIFIED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE AND IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE SUPPLIER WILL BID AND USE THE CLOSEST SIZE AVAILABLE. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND/OR HOMEOWNER SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CHECKING AND VERIFICATION OF DIMENSIONS, DETAILS, AND NOTES, AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES, SPECIFICATIONS, STRUCTURAL AND/OR SAFETY REQUIREMENTS AND CONFORMITY TO ALL FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL BUILDING CODES, LAWS AND ORDINANCES. HOMES WHICH ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN AREAS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO EXTRAORDINARY SEISMIC, WIND, SNOWFALL, COLD OR FLOOD ISSUES SHOULD BE ENGINEERED AND INSPECTED BY A CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL FAMILIAR WITH THE PARTICULAR CONDITIONS OF THAT REGION. THESE PLANS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF BEHR DESIGN, INC., SHALL NOT BE COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF BEHR DESIGN, INC. OR THE CLIENT FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED FOR.A4 Upper Floor PlanLundquist Residence 1074 Loma Linda Ave Mound, MN BDD 8/16/21 21-00CL 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " A41 UP P E R F L O O R P L A N NOTES:1.) ALL BRG. HEADERS ARE TO BE (2)-2x10 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE (UNO).2.) OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL WINDOW & DOOR SIZES.3.) OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO SPEC. ALL FLOORING MATERIAL.4.) OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS.5.) ALL BRG WALL WINDOW & DOOR OPNG'S WIDER THAN 60" REQUIRE (2) TRIMMERS MIN. UNDER EA. SIDE OF HEADER.6.) (FL) - F L U S H B E A M , ( D R ) D R O P P E D B E A M 7.) ALL HEADERS ARE DROPPED UNLESS NOTED (FL)8.) USE ENERGY HEEL HEIGHT ON ROOF TRUSSES. 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " A42 Bo n u s R m F l o o r 1/ 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " A43 Ro o f P l a n MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 11,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono City Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present:Mayor Dennis Walsh,City Council Members Matt Johnson,Aaron Printup(arrived at 7:10 p.m.),Richard Crosby III,and Victoria Seals. Representing Staff were City Attorney Soren Mattick,City Administrator/Engineer Adam Edwards,Finance Director Ron Olson,Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart, and City Planner Melanie Curtis. Mayor Walsh called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA Crosby would like to pull Item 7 for discussion,and add Items 15 and 18 to the Consent Agenda. 1.CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 27,2021 2.COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 27,2021 4. APPROVAL OF RENTAL LICENSE 5. APPOINTMENT OF 2021 EMPLOYEES 6. LA21-000060—TIM JOHNSON O/B/O SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB,725 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH,CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT—RESOLUTION NO.7220 7. LA21-000051—ROBERT LINDEN CONSTRUCTION, 1074 LOMA LINDA AVENUE, VARIANCES—RESOLUTION NO.7221 This item was removed from the Consent Agenda. 8. LA21-000059—ALLISON CELMS AND OLIVER WHITE, 1040 LOMA LINDA AVENUE,VARIANCE—RESOLUTION NO.7222 9. LA21-000055—TIM WHITTEN O/B/O MARK E.JACOBS AND TRISHA BLAKE, 1700 SHORELINE DRIVE—FINAL PLAT—RESOLUTION NO.7223 10. LA21-000061—ERIC VOGSTROM O/B/O WILLIAM AND SUSAN DUNKLEY& ERIC VOGSTROM,2710 PENCE LANE AND 2709 WALTERS PORT—PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL 11. LA21-000016—SCHIMMEL CONSTRUCTION O/B/O DAVID& KATHRYN WIEMER, 1405 REST POINT ROAD,AMEND RESOLUTION 7189—RESOLUTION NO.7225 12. LA21-000064—ORIGINAL FILE LA19-000068,ERIC JOHNSON,580 ORCHARD PARK ROAD,VARIANCE,RESOLUTION 7029—RESOLUTION NO.7226 13. APPROVAL OF MN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY GRANT AND RESOLUTION NO.7228 Page 1 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 11,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. CONSENT AGENDA- Continued 15. REFUND 2010A BONDS—RESOLUTION NO. 7229 18. APPOINTMENT OF PARK COMMISSIONERS—RESOLUTION NO. 7227 Crosby moved,Johnson seconded,to approve the Consent Agenda as amended.VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS Barbara Schmidt asked for her name to be corrected in the September 27,2021 Minutes as her name was listed as Schwartz. She noted she would not be able to answer any questions tonight pending the lawsuit. Ms. Schmidt stated the police were called on September 21,2021 because of bike racing in Bederwood Park directly past the playground and park-goers that were out in the open.This call was due to extreme speed and the number of bikers in Bederwood Park by one of the local property owners(not Ms. Schmidt). She said they have evidence that bike practice regularly encircles the playground,and in one instance rode through the playground. She asked the City Council to see her legal team for this documentation.Mountain biking is,by design,an assertive activity and at times an aggressive sport that should not be taking place next to open soccer fields,little children's playgrounds,or walking paths. It is just too dangerous. When this whole idea of bikes in parks came up three years ago, one Park Commissioner verbally approved the practice in the park;the City Administrator said it was a"trial for youngsters."Ms. Schmidt noted the trial is over and said for"us"it is a failure. Mayor Walsh asked who is"us"? Ms. Schmidt replied it is the neighborhood and there are several petitions that state this. Mayor Walsh has not seen any petitions. Ms. Schmidt continued,saying she witnessed approximately 40 riders in the park at one time, it was filled and the parking lot was overflowing.Most of the youngsters were in high school and there were several adults taking up every square inch of the park at speeds that should not happen next to pedestrians.In fact,Ms. Schmidt was nearly ridden over by one of the coaches with a go-pro camera attached to his helmet,possibly filming every single park-goer. She said this is not a safe situation, it is an accident that will happen and they should ask themselves who is liable for personal injury in this situation?School districts?Ms. Schmidt stated they are not doing the schools any favors by setting up these collision courses to happen.The neighborhood and public parks are not racetracks,the parks are not public mountain biking courses,they should not be ridden in the dark with LED lights.Ms. Schmidt stated that Bederwood Park is a place to gather and spend time with families and friends, it is a place for Little Leagues,children playing,dog-walking, and where they meet families and friends.As Mrs.Carlson- Nelson wrote to the City Council,please find another solution to protect these precious woods,not just for us but for future generations. Mayor Walsh asked if Ms. Schmidt would call them big woods? Page 2 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 11,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS—Continued Ms. Schmidt replied they are big woods. Mayor Walsh asked if Ms. Schmidt knew that 50 years ago it was a field. Ms. Schmidt stated she cannot answer his questions any longer because of the pending lawsuit. If anyone wants to hear about the lawsuit,they can look at the Facebook page. Mayor Walsh said when Ms. Schmidt says misnomers and things that are completely not true it calls out someone to reflect the truth. Deborah Crump,25 Stubbs Bay Road, said there is the park, a new construction,and her house. They have been at that location for a long time and her husband was born-and-raised. She watched the City build the park where they put the new soccer field and asked where did they get all the dirt,as she is impressed,it is beautiful,and she is happy the children all have a place to go as it is growing very large in the area.Ms. Crump chose to be very open-minded about this bike trail,she went down and watched them build the soccer field,watched the kids play in the park, and she watches people every day go by her house to the park and lake. There are parents going down with children in strollers,people walking dogs, joggers, and even horses sometimes going down the street. She said she watches them going to the park and noted they shook their heads and walked away.Ms. Crump stated this park is a family park and stated kids are rolling down the side of the hill and running on different sides of the park and now they cannot do this which breaks her heart. Mayor Walsh asked why the kids can't do this? Ms. Crump replied because the bikes are there. Mayor Walsh asked if the bikes are there 24 hours a day? Ms. Crump replied they are not there every minute. She said Orono can do better than trying to squeeze this track in to this little park. She said to take safety and consideration with kids going this way and that way and going out of the parking lot it is an accident waiting to happen.Ms. Crump went down and watched and saw them dashing out in front of the cars by the parking lot and it scared her. She noted the bikes came across the end where the playground is and little kids ran out that way while bikes were going through there. She asked who does she call to get the beer cans out of her backyard?Ms. Crump said those little trails lead back into her property and this is also something that needs to be addressed. PRESENTATION 14. DIAMOND LAKE REGIONAL TRAIL-THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT Stephen Shurson,landscape architect with Three Rivers Park District,noted he is present tonight with Stewart Crosby of SRF Consulting Group.Mr. Shurson gave an update on the Diamond Lake Regional Trail Master Plan and seeks the City Council's approval on the preferred route within the City limits of Orono along Ferndale.The Master Plan will be finished early next year and will be used as a long-term Page 3 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 11,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. PRESENTATION—Continued planning document in development of the trail.The trail would extend from Dayton to Wayzata,trails would be 10 feet wide,paved,off-road/separated from traffic, and would include bridge structures, boardwalks, or underpasses as needed. Three Rivers has been working with the seven cities along the route to gain approval from each; so far there is approval from the other six cities. Previously they were looking at routes through Orono on Long Lake Road and up Spring Hill Road;based on a new Medina route they are now looking at a new route through Orono.He walked the City Council through the proposed route utilizing existing trails through Baker,the Independence Regional Trail,and the Luce Line over to Ferndale. Crosby asked what kind of encroachments will the trail have along anyone's property? Mr. Shurson replied it should all fit within the street right-of-way and they will look at street-widths if there is opportunity to be compliant; if there would be any easement along Ferndale it would be very narrow along the side and those are Wayzata residents. Johnson moved,Crosby seconded,to accept the Diamond Lake Regional Trail section in Orono. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT 7. LA21-000051—ROBERT LINDEN CONSTRUCTION, 1074 LOMA LINDA AVENUE, VARIANCES—RESOLUTION NO.7221 Staff presented a summary packet of information. City Planner Melanie Curtis noted the Applicant is proposing to rebuild the existing detached garage and connect it to the home with a small, 5.9-foot addition that will continue the 1.2-foot setback from the north side of the home.The detached garage is 15. 9 feet from the rear property line where 30 feet is required;the Applicant is requesting setback variances from the side and rear to connect the garage to the home and add a'Y2-or%-story addition over the garage. Robert Linden,4356 5th St NE,Columbia Heights,builder,and John Lindquist, 1074 Loma Linda Avenue, approached the podium. Mr.Linden noted the need for the northeast section is because the utilities go into the home on the northwest corner so that corridor would be the connecting point for utilities and keeping the separation between the garage and home. Mayor Walsh noted the City Council has usually been consistent in not allowing things to become more non-conforming and this application makes it more non-conforming. The reason they say no to things is because a year or two later someone will tear the entire house down and say now they get to rebuild like- kind.The City Attorney will tell them that all of the people the Council said no to for the same type of issue will then come to the City wanting to do that, as well.Mayor Walsh noted they need to be consistent. Johnson asked regarding the area labeled"mechanical,"is that a further expansion of the very limited setback of the garage or is it the height? Page 4 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 11,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. 7. LA21-000051—ROBERT LINDEN CONSTRUCTION, 1074 LOMA LINDA AVENUE, VARIANCES—RESOLUTION NO.7221—Continued Mayor Walsh replied it is both,they want to add the height within the setback and additional hardcover/building structure within the setback. Mr. Linden noted they are actually reducing the hardcover as it is today. Mayor Walsh asked if it is within the setback. Mr.Linden knows there is a concrete sidewalk that already exists there which will now become building foundation. The height is a story-and-a-half so everything will be within the roof envelope. Mayor Walsh stated they are still adding non-conformity and the City Council has said no to others in the past. Mr.Linden stated the street setback is virtually impossible where it is now. Mayor Walsh replied there are inherent practical difficulties with those kinds of issues that the City Council can work with; however,this application is purposely adding more non-conformity in structure which creates its ownP roblems. Johnson's concern is not so much the height but the enlargement to the garage. Printup moved,Seals seconded,to table LA21-000051, 1074 Loma Linda Avenue,Variances— Resolution No.7221.VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. 16. LA21-000057/58—ROBERT ERICKSON,365 WESTLAKE STREET,GENNESARET PRELIMINARY PLAT Staff presented a summary packet of information. Barnhart stated the Applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval to plat a property he owns,recently vacated portions of Westlake,and is proposing to give the City the drainage and utility easement and additional land for a cul-de-sac. The Planning Commission reviewed the application and recommended approval with the comment on the additional easement to make the cul-de-sac a more conforming size. Staff and Planning Commission recommended an additional 10-foot easement on the backside in lieu of the boulevard reserve the Applicant proposed as part of the vacation request.The Planning Commission offered that potentially shifting the cul-de-sac to the west a bit,it would fit within the existing or additional right-of-way that Mr. Erickson would provide.To this point,Mr. Erickson has objected to that request and Mr.Barnhart seeks City Council's direction on that. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to the provision of an easement for the cul-de- sac and Watershed District approval. Mayor Walsh clarified that the Watershed does not give approvals on a preliminary plat but a final plat, therefore it cannot be a condition on a preliminary plat. Bob Erickson,372 Westlake Street,noted about a year ago he applied for a sketch plan to combine five smaller lots that were subdivided in the early 1900's and combining with the southern portion of Westlake Street which has since been vacated. Throughout the process,the boundaries of the proposed Page 5 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 11,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. 16. LA21-000057/58—ROBERT ERICKSON,365 WESTLAKE STREET,GENNESARET PRELIMINARY PLAT—Continued plat(Lot 1,Block 1 Gennesaret)have remained unchanged.Mr.Erickson noted that is the application before the City Council tonight and he asks for their preliminary approval. Johnson asked what Mr.Erickson's objection is to having a conforming 50-foot cul-de-sac versus a 40- foot? Mr.Erickson replied to obtain a full 50-feet,the center of the cul-de-sac would have to go westward 17 feet; in looking at the contours or looking at the property they would find a substantial hill that the cul-de- sac would be moved into. Mayor Walsh said to move it just 10 feet there is another 4 feet of hill;now instead of a 6-foot wall they must build there is a 10-foot wall.He noted going the other way and taking more of Mr.Erickson's and someone else's property—he does not own half of that land so the City Council cannot dictate that.He noted if they got the other part of the property,it is also going uphill so once they take that extra 10 feet down into the cul-de-sac,Mr.Erickson is most likely going to have to regrade his entire yard and his driveway to even meet that slope.He noted they would be creating chaos.Third,a prior Council and Staff did their homework and said they could live with 40 feet,so they built their driveway,sold property,built houses,planted trees.Mayor Walsh reiterated that a prior City Council and Staff did their homework and vetted it. He noted it would be a humongous hill and would be a burden for everyone,the City,and safety. The City Council and Staff discussed options for the cul-de-sac;Edwards noted they would pave the standard 40 feet and get quite close to a conforming cul-de-sac.He noted the standard is driven by State Fire Code. Johnson clarified they could achieve the cul-de-sac but there might not be the full 10-foot easement on the east side. Edwards replied that is correct. City Attorney Mattick noted the City gets more flexibility with the right-of-way but if they do not need it, they do not need it. He assumes there is a 10-foot easement to the east which mirrors the proposal and as a drainage and utility they will not be able to pave that 10 feet. If they can achieve the paving with what has already been given and the City is comfortable with that understanding that to get to the conforming,they may have to cheat a bit to the west. Barnhart clarified if the City Council were to approve as presented,they would approve with no extra easement;then the Applicant would come back with a final plat that would be substantially consistent with what they see here. Mayor Walsh noted they still have to approve the final plat which will be subject to the Watershed and other agencies. Crosby moved,Printup seconded,to approve LA21-000057/5,365 Westlake Street,Gennesaret Preliminary Plat as presented.VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. Page 6 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 11,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. 17. LA21-000062—DON GAMBLE OB/O WARD E.EDWARDS AND DONNA EDWARDS 2474 CARMAN)AND RA EDWARDS ET AL(2480 CARMAN)—CONCEPT REVIEW Staff presented a summary packet of information. Barnhart noted this is a concept review of a potential policy change as the Applicant is proposing to rezone the property.The City Council previously looked at configurations that would create a buildable site south and north of the lagoon creating four lots total. The City Council consistently said they were not comfortable creating non-conforming lots and the challenge has been that south of the lagoon the minimum lot size has always been 1 acre. One portion of land is about.7 acres and the other is less than that but more than.5 acres.The Applicant is proposing to rezone the block of parcels to LR-1 C which is a half-acre zone with a 100-foot frontage width for a lake lot measured at the lake and 75 feet back.Doing that would allow 2474 and 2480 Carman to be split into two conforming lots.Barnhart noted the question is whether the City Council would be open to a formal application for a zone change.He noted it is fairly consistent with how Casco Point Road has been developed. From a planning perspective, Staff does not see a huge issue with how it is proposed.He noted the Comprehensive Plan says it is low-density residential and is compatible with how it is currently zoned and with the LR-1C zoning district. The City Council looked at the 1-acre lots and'/2-acre lots on screen. Don Gamble, 10704 Water Lily Lane,Woodbury, stated the confusing part is how it was zoned in those two different zones.Looking to the west and all the way around the point it is all LR-1C(1/2 acre)until it gets to this point and it goes to 1B with the back of the lots still being 1C but everything south being 1B. He noted changing the zoning does not change the densities,rather they just become conforming with the neighborhood and the density around it. Mayor Walsh would like to see it conform with what is there—he could take the two orange lots and make them one, split off the two lots and then they would all be conforming with current zoning. Mr.Gamble noted it is two separate owners and it seems to him that the zoning is off. Jeff James,owner of 2470 which is just to the west,asked if they rezone this does it negatively affect his property in any way?He does not think it does.His understanding is the way it is zoned is to have one house right now,therefore this zoning change would make it able to have two houses. He wants to be sure it would not be three properties. The City Council replied no,there would not be three. Mr.James stated the south shore of the northern lots is all wooded with deer and he noted they do not want to have one driveway down the middle with multiple units in there. Mayor Walsh noted Barnhart was looking for feedback on the issue. FINANCE DIRECTOR REPORT Finance Director Olson updated the City Council on building permit activity for new homes noting in September the City was a bit lower than previous two years but with total permits the City is right on target. They are currently at 85%or$359,000. Page 7 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 11,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT Attorney Mattick had nothing to report. CITY ADMINISTRATOR/ENGINEER REPORT City Administrator/Engineer Edwards stated he is working with the County on a bridge reconstruction plan on North Shore Drive for the following year. He met with the County design team and the final phase of the Wayzata Boulevard turn-back project will be in 2023.Edwards noted they had approximately 25 people at the Parks Commission work session regarding an increased demand for pickleball courts across the metro. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Seals said it was homecoming and there were many people at the game. She shared regarding the soccer club at Bederwood field that every soccer club parent that uses the field loves it and has not complained about being restricted by other parties. She has not heard from any of them. They think it is great that there is a parking lot and playground and many of them bike to the park. Is it busy?Yes.That is a sign that people are using resources that tax money has gone into. She lives near the park and is happy to go down and walk the park with neighbors who are concerned. Johnson noted it is also a trailhead. Crosby thinks it is important during public comments to allow people to speak;however,if it is about reiterating the same thing,it gets old. He noted the City is improving their parks,kids are playing in parks and being active outside,and that is the way it is going to happen in Orono.He stated they do not need to apologize for improving their parks and having children use them. Crosby shared regarding water meters that were changed out to the upgraded ones and the issue he has is that he cannot actually see it for the water usage. He noted he had an irrigation leak that he did not know about and his last bill was$700. Crosby said if the City puts a new meter on someone's house,they need to have access to see it if something is going on so if there is a leak it can be addressed. Edwards thinks it may be an installation issue and Crosby may be able to just turn it so it is facing him. Johnson moved,Printup seconded that the City request that the Three Rivers Park District plow the Dakota Rail Trail this year.VOTE: Ayes 5.Nays 0. Johnson noted they had very talented people wanting to give their time to the parks at the earlier meeting. He asked how do they improve the City's parks so it attracts more people; on one hand they want to bring in a different group and then people do not want it.He said one of the Park Commissioners lives across the street from the golf course and wants more activity at the golf course and wants it to be a year-round attraction.Johnson noted there are a lot of people that live near the parks who want them used more, Seals included.He said they added three new Park Commissioners tonight.Johnson shared about the public works facility plans including traffic flow. Mayor Walsh stated homecoming was great and the kids had a blast.He met with Charlie Minor,the mayor of Long Lake,regarding the fire department.Each City will hire an appraiser and get some proposals on the worth of municipal facilities.He said it looks like the conclusion is whatever the two appraisers come up with,they will take the average,and would then buy it to move forward.They hope this process would culminate in 2023 and they could take over the whole contract in 2022 or 2023. Page 8 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 11,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. ADJOURNMENT Seals moved,Crosby seconded,to adjourn the meeting at 7:41 p.m.VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. ATTEST: di/ gs 10 nna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Page 9 of 9 AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: mcc Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: 1. Purpose. This application is regarding rear and side setback variances in order to construct additions to the existing home. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received and was considered to be complete on July 21st. The 60-Day review period was extended and expires on November 18, 2021. 3. Background/ Summary. The applicant is proposing to rebuild the detached garage, add a second story, and attach it to the home with a 5.9 foot addition on the main level. The existing home has two bedrooms and one bathroom, all on the 2nd floor. The applicant is proposing to reconfigure the main level to accommodate a half bath, and construct an additional bedroom/office and bathroom over the new garage to improve function and livability. The existing detached garage is 16 feet from the rear lot line, and 1.2 feet from the north side lot line where a 30-foot rear, and 7.5-foot side setback are required. The connecting addition and upper level of the garage will be 1.2 feet from the side lot line and by nature of the connection will become part of the principal building. The connection will therefore result in the house becoming nonconforming by the side and rear setbacks. Setback variances are necessary to facilitate this change to the home. The existing home is currently conforming with respect to all setbacks. The connection of the home and garage will result in the currently conforming home to become nonconforming on the rear and north sides. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On September 20th, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. Following the public hearing the Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 on a motion to approve the requested variances. 5. Public Comment. No written comments from the neighbors were received. The neighbor acknowledgments are attached as Exhibit D. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval subject to the applicant addressing, with the building permit submittal, the stormwater so that the property to the north is not adversely impacted. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt or amend the approval resolution. Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Resolution Exhibit B. Proposed Plans Exhibit C. Draft PC Minutes Exhibit D. Neighbor Acknowledgments Exhibit E. PC Staff Report Item No.: # Date: 11 October 2021 Item Description: #LA21-000051, Robert Linden Construction, 1074 Loma Linda Avenue, Variances – Resolution Presenter: Melanie Curtis Planner Agenda Section: Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: mcc Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: References PC Exhibits 9/20/2021 Exhibit A. Application and Submitted Narratives Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing Survey and Existing House Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Survey Exhibit E. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit F. Photos by applicant Exhibit G. Photos Exhibit H. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit I. Adjacent Property Acknowledgments Exhibit J. Property Owners List Exhibit K. Plat Map AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: LLO Reviewed By: J.Barnhart Approved By: 1. Purpose. The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance to elevate the grade lakeward of the setback over 42 inches in height. The applicant has submitted amended plans based on the City Staff and the Planning Commission recommendation. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received on March 23, and considered to be complete on March 28, 2022. Therefore the 60-Day review period expires on May 27, 2022. 3. Background/ Summary. The previous owners of the property removed the home and did not fill in the basement area, leaving a 4 foot ‘depression” on the property. This ‘depression’ establishes the existing grade. The applicant proposed creating a pool, patio, and retaining wall approximately 11.5 feet above this exiting grade, and 8 feet above the ‘natural’ grade of the property. The applicant, responding to Staff and the Planning Commission recommendations, has revised the plans showing the pool, patio, and retaining wall 3.5 feet above the ‘natural’ grade of the lot, and approximately 7 feet above the existing grade. The Planning Commission staff report provides additional detail on the grades. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On April 18th, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. The commission reviewed the application and discussed support for filling in the unique lake yard as the elevation for measuring the average lakeshore setbacks. However, they did not find any practical difficulties to support the applicant’s proposal into the setback by raising the grade 11.5’ for a patio, pool and retaining walls. Following the public hearing the Planning Commission voted 6 to 0 on a motion to deny the requested average lakeshore setback variance following staff’s recommendation. 5. Public Comment. No public comments were received. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the amended plans. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt or amend the approval resolution. Exhibits A. Draft Resolution B. Proposed Amended Plans and Original Plans C. Draft PC Minutes D. PC Staff Report References PC Exhibits 4.18.2022 A. Application B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form C. Survey and Images D. Proposed Plans and Elevations E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations F. Property Owners List and Map Item No.: 12 Date: May 9, 2022 Item Description: LA22-000014 – Eric Zehnder, 940 North Arm Drive, Variance – Resolution 7264 Presenter: Laura Oakden Planner Agenda Section: Planning Report CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7264 1 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-1279 FILE NO. LA22-000014 WHEREAS, on March 28, 2022, Eric Zehnder o/b/o James Mattson “Applicant”, applied for a variance from the City Code for the property addressed 940 North Arm Drive and legally described as: Lot 10, Block 1, Pirates Cove (hereinafter the “Property”); WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow improvements above 42 inches above existing grade within the average lakeshore setback; and WHEREAS, on April 18, 2022, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on April 18, 2022 the Planning Commission recommended denial of the variance; and WHEREAS, on April 29, 2022 the applicant submitted amended plans; and WHEREAS, on May 9, 2022, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby [approves/denies] the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA22-000014. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7264 2 2. The Property is located in the LR-1B Zoning District. 3. The Property contains 0.99 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 120 feet at the OHWL. 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]: a. Average Lakeshore Setback 6. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: 1. “Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance . . . .” The proposed property will not impact the sight lines of the lake for the neighboring property. The variance would meet this standard. 2. “Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan.” The property is being used for a single family home consistent with the comprehensive plan. The project is proposing to install a patio and pool which are accessory improvements to the primary use of the site, which is the house. 3. “Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. ‘Practical difficulties,’ as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The applicant states “Due to the existing grade of the land, it is a difficult lot to build on and the added fill to bring the pool up to the desired grade does not impact neighbors on either side and will not at all impact any site lines.” b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The slope in the lakeyard and irregular contour for the neighborhood were not created by the homeowner. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7264 3 c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.” The proposed project would bring the land grading created by a previous owner closer to the natural grade of the sloped lakeyard. 4. “Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.” Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. “Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.” This condition is not applicable. 6. “The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.” This condition is not applicable, as house with a patio and pool are an allowed use in the LR-1B District. 7. “The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.” This condition is not applicable. 8. “The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.” The grading on the parcel is unique, left over from an older home demolition project. Elevating the proposed pool and patio above 42 inches in height is not unique due to the land depression. 9. “The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.” The depression in the land left from the demolition from a previous home supports the argument for deviation from the strict reading, as this condition is not found in the area 10. “The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.” The proposed project to elevate the grade for the site to a maintainable slope is necessary for the preservation of the nature sloped lakeyard. 11. “The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter.” The proposed project will restore the nature slope of the lakeyard which will align with the neighboring properties. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7264 4 12. “The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.” The depression in the lakeyard is a unique difficulty, granting the variance will all the grading the lakeyard to be restored to a more natural grade. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow average lakeshore setback, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the survey dated April 29, 2022 submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (May 9, 2023). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this ______ day of ________________, 20__. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: _______________________________ ________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor / FIELD CREW NO. OMAK 9 DRAWN 10 EMW 11 CHECKED 12 DLS 13 DATE 14 2-16-21 15 / / BY JRS JRS 0.a />:J.,, / DATE 10/25/2021 10/26/2021 I ATL.V I 9 REVISION USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR ADDED GAZEBO & PATIO, REMOVED HOT TUB CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS REVISED GAZEBO & PATIO & HARDCOVER CALC STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s +-----+------+------------------1 EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID JRS 1115/2021 JRS 1126/2022 REVISED POOL PATIO AREA. & HARDCOVER CALC AUIBORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND REVISIONS & HARDCOVER CALC SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF JRS 213/2022 t------t-------t------------------1 ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SAIBRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES JRS 2/25/2022 JRS 4/2912022 TREES ADDED/TREE SUMMARY UPDATED THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY REVISED POOL PATIO AND GRADING LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES REVISED POOL PATIO AND GRADING RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. I AT L.V I ' ' I I I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 22nd day of April, 2021. Daniel L. Schmidt, PLS Minnesota License No. 26147 schmidt@sathre.com I I I I I I I I I \ I I I I I 1,.1'-S \,. ' "' ,,.,, '1-i;-_.. s S(J i/ 1,,., J- Fence ties are shown on the side of the boundary line that the fence is located on. N 0 s C A L E 20 ---c::-=-=- Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD 83 -1986 adj.) 10 10 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Lot 10, Block 1, PIRATES COVE, according to the recorded plat thereo Hennepin County, Minnesota STANDARD NO1ES Site Address: 940 North Ann Drive, Orono, Minnesota 55364 A title opinion was not furnished to the surveyor as part of this survey. Only casements per the recorded plat are shown unless otherwise denoted hereon. Flood Zone Information: X (area determined to be outside of the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) and Zone AE (Areas subject to inundation by the I-percent-annual-chance flood event determined by detailed methods. Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) are shown at 931.5.) per Flood .Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053C0284F, effective date of November 4th, 2016. Parcel Area Information: Gross Area: 43,378 s.f. ± ~ 0.996 acres± *We do not affirmatively insure the quantity of acreage set forth in 1he description Benchmark: Elevations are based on Hellllepin County Geodetic Station Name: FOREST which has an elevation of: 945.31 feet (NGVD29). Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is LR-lB (One Family Lak.eshore Residential -1 Acre) per the City of Orono's zoning map dated November, 2018. The setback, height, and floor space area restrictions for said zoning designation are as follows: Principal Structure Setbacks -Street(s): 35 feet (North Arm Drive) Side: 10 feet Rear: 30 feet Lake: 75 feet (From Ordinary High Water Line) Height: 30 feet Hardcover: 25 percent of lot area Please note that the zoning information shown hereon may have been amended through a city process. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. All setback information and hardcover data for planning and design must be verified by all parties involved in the design and planning process. We have not received the current zoning classification and building setback requirements from the insurer. Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities on the surveyed property by observed evidence only. There may be underground utilities encumbering the subject property we are unaware. Please note that we have not placed a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be widerground utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise before any excavation takes place on or near this site. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property. Before digging, you are required by law to notify Gopher State One Call at least 48 hours in advance at 651/454-0002. No wetland delineation was performed for this survey. The Wetland Boundary and Wetland Buffer lines shown hereon are conservative estimates. Proposed Elevations Proposed Garage Floor Elevation Proposed Top ofFoundation Elevation Proposed First Floor Elevation Proposed Basement Floor Elevation = 973.2 = 973.7 = 975.6 = 965.0 Point# Species 18451 Tree 18452 Tree 18453 Tree 18454 Tree 18455 Tree 18456 Maple 18457 Tree 18458 Maple 18459 Maple 18460 Maple 18461 Maple 18462 Tree 18463 Tree 18464 Tree 18465 Tree 18466 Tree 18467 Tree 18468 Maple 18469 Maple 18470 Tree 18471 Tree 18472 Tree 18473 Tree 18474 Maple 18475 Maple 18476 Maple 18477 Maple 18478 Tree 18479 Maple 18480 Maple Tree Summary Size Point# Species 6" 65001 Tree 6" 65002 Boxwood 20" 65003 Boxwood 6"/4" x2 65004 Boxwood (OFFSITE) 8" 65005 Boxwood 22" 65006 Tree 6" 65007 Tree 20" 65008 Tree 24" 65009 Tree 24" 65010 Tree 10" 65011 Tree 6" 65012 Tree 6" 65013 Tree B" 65014 Boxwood 10" 65015 Boxwood 6" •5016 Bo-·--' B" 12" 12" 28" B" B" 12" 10" 10' 16" 16" 14" 10' 12" Trees to be Removed = Size 8" 24" 8" 8" 18" 10" 16" 16" 16" 12" 12" 20" 20" 14" 20" '"" 18481 Tree 16" *Tree Summary based on field sun,ey, not @ CAST IRON MONUMENT 0 IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET e IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND ►DRILL HOLE FOUND ){CHISELED "X" MONUMENT SET X CHISELED "X" MONUMENT FOUND *REBAR MONUMENT FOUND L, PK NAIL MONUMENT SET A PK NAIL MONUMENT FOUND 0 PK NAIL W/ ALUMINUM DISC /:o SURVEY CONTROL POINT 18482 Maple 24" pe,formed by Arborist SURVEY LEGEND (!} PIEZOMETER LJ POWER POLE GUY WIRE ROOF DRAIN LIFT STATION SANITARY MANHOLE SANITARY CLEANOUT STORM MANHOLE STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION FFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. I' . · ' . I CONCRETE BITUMINOUS ------.-BUILDING SETBACK LINE --CTV--CABLE TV CON CRETE CURB --960 ____ CONTOUR EXISTING 71111 -L■ 0 I 20 I 40 I 161 A/C UNIT [g CABLE TV PEDESTAL FLARED END SECTION TREE CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS CONTOUR PROPOSED -0--0-0-0--0-GUARD RA I L SCALE IN FEET V I C I N I T y M A p TWP:117-RGE.23-SEC.07 Hennepin County 11] ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER ® ELECTRIC MANHOLE ® ELECTRIC METER rn ELECTRIC OUTLET 0 YARD LIGHT ¢ LIGHT POLE (1) FIBER OPTIC MANHOLE q FIRE DEPT. HOOK UP f'" FLAG POLE [0 FUEL PUMP FUEL TANK [i] PROPANE TANK © GAS METER [i8IJ GAS VAL VE © GAS MANHOLE @cJ GENERATOR EB GUARD POST 181 HAND HOLE ['l MAIL BOX TREE CONIFEROUS REMOVED --OT --DRAIN TILE TREE DECIDUOUS REMOVED --ELC--ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND (i) IT] (Q) TELEPHONE MANHOLE -x--x-FENCE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL --FD --FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND UTILITY MANHOLE --GAS--GAS UNDERGROUND IQ] UTILITY PEDESTAL IY] UTILITY VAULT @ WATERMAIN MANHOLE @ WATER METER CO, WATER SPIGOT 1i!i» WELL MONITORING WELL (]) CURB STOP IXl GATE VALVE "Cf HYDRANT IRRIGATION VALVE POST INDICATOR VAL VE --u-SIGN [sa] SOIL BORING --oHu--OVERHEAD UTILITY TREE LINE -->--SANITARY SEWER --»--STORM SEWER --TEL--TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND RETAINING WALL -- UTL--UTILITY UNDERGROUND --I --WATERMAIN TRAFFIC SIGNAL RAILROAD TRACKS RAILROAD SIGNAL RAILROAD SWITCH SATELLITE DISH WETLAND BUFFER SIGN CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FILE NO. 35750-003 i SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. ORONO, MINNESOTA PREPARED FOR: 1 $...... p '--" 14000 25TH AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 120 PLYMOUTH MN 55447 (952) 476-6000 WWW.SATHRE.COM ZEHNDER HOMES 1 / FIELD CREW NO. OMAK 9 DRAWN 10 EMW 11 CHECKED 12 DLS 13 DATE 14 2-16-21 15 / / BY JRS JRS 0.a />:J.,, / DATE 10/25/2021 10/26/2021 I ATL.V I 9 REVISION USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR ADDED GAZEBO & PATIO, REMOVED HOT TUB CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS REVISED GAZEBO & PATIO & HARDCOVER CALC STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s +-----+------+------------------1 EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID JRS 1115/2021 JRS 1126/2022 REVISED POOL PATIO AREA. & HARDCOVER CALC AUIBORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND REVISIONS & HARDCOVER CALC SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF JRS 213/2022 t------t-------t------------------1 ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SAIBRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES JRS 2/25/2022 JRS 4/2912022 TREES ADDED/TREE SUMMARY UPDATED THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY REVISED POOL PATIO AND GRADING LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES REVISED POOL PATIO AND GRADING RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. I AT L.V I ' ' I I I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 22nd day of April, 2021. Daniel L. Schmidt, PLS Minnesota License No. 26147 schmidt@sathre.com I I I I I I I I I \ I I I I I 1,.1'-S \,. ' "' ,,.,, '1-i;-_.. s S(J i/ 1,,., J- Fence ties are shown on the side of the boundary line that the fence is located on. N 0 s C A L E 20 ---c::-=-=- Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD 83 -1986 adj.) 10 10 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Lot 10, Block 1, PIRATES COVE, according to the recorded plat thereo Hennepin County, Minnesota STANDARD NO1ES Site Address: 940 North Ann Drive, Orono, Minnesota 55364 A title opinion was not furnished to the surveyor as part of this survey. Only casements per the recorded plat are shown unless otherwise denoted hereon. Flood Zone Information: X (area determined to be outside of the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) and Zone AE (Areas subject to inundation by the I-percent-annual-chance flood event determined by detailed methods. Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) are shown at 931.5.) per Flood .Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053C0284F, effective date of November 4th, 2016. Parcel Area Information: Gross Area: 43,378 s.f. ± ~ 0.996 acres± *We do not affirmatively insure the quantity of acreage set forth in 1he description Benchmark: Elevations are based on Hellllepin County Geodetic Station Name: FOREST which has an elevation of: 945.31 feet (NGVD29). Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is LR-lB (One Family Lak.eshore Residential -1 Acre) per the City of Orono's zoning map dated November, 2018. The setback, height, and floor space area restrictions for said zoning designation are as follows: Principal Structure Setbacks -Street(s): 35 feet (North Arm Drive) Side: 10 feet Rear: 30 feet Lake: 75 feet (From Ordinary High Water Line) Height: 30 feet Hardcover: 25 percent of lot area Please note that the zoning information shown hereon may have been amended through a city process. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. All setback information and hardcover data for planning and design must be verified by all parties involved in the design and planning process. We have not received the current zoning classification and building setback requirements from the insurer. Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities on the surveyed property by observed evidence only. There may be underground utilities encumbering the subject property we are unaware. Please note that we have not placed a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be widerground utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise before any excavation takes place on or near this site. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property. Before digging, you are required by law to notify Gopher State One Call at least 48 hours in advance at 651/454-0002. No wetland delineation was performed for this survey. The Wetland Boundary and Wetland Buffer lines shown hereon are conservative estimates. Proposed Elevations Proposed Garage Floor Elevation Proposed Top ofFoundation Elevation Proposed First Floor Elevation Proposed Basement Floor Elevation = 973.2 = 973.7 = 975.6 = 965.0 Point# Species 18451 Tree 18452 Tree 18453 Tree 18454 Tree 18455 Tree 18456 Maple 18457 Tree 18458 Maple 18459 Maple 18460 Maple 18461 Maple 18462 Tree 18463 Tree 18464 Tree 18465 Tree 18466 Tree 18467 Tree 18468 Maple 18469 Maple 18470 Tree 18471 Tree 18472 Tree 18473 Tree 18474 Maple 18475 Maple 18476 Maple 18477 Maple 18478 Tree 18479 Maple 18480 Maple Tree Summary Size Point# Species 6" 65001 Tree 6" 65002 Boxwood 20" 65003 Boxwood 6"/4" x2 65004 Boxwood (OFFSITE) 8" 65005 Boxwood 22" 65006 Tree 6" 65007 Tree 20" 65008 Tree 24" 65009 Tree 24" 65010 Tree 10" 65011 Tree 6" 65012 Tree 6" 65013 Tree B" 65014 Boxwood 10" 65015 Boxwood 6" •5016 Bo-·--' B" 12" 12" 28" B" B" 12" 10" 10' 16" 16" 14" 10' 12" Trees to be Removed = Size 8" 24" 8" 8" 18" 10" 16" 16" 16" 12" 12" 20" 20" 14" 20" '"" 18481 Tree 16" *Tree Summary based on field sun,ey, not @ CAST IRON MONUMENT 0 IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET e IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND ►DRILL HOLE FOUND ){CHISELED "X" MONUMENT SET X CHISELED "X" MONUMENT FOUND *REBAR MONUMENT FOUND L, PK NAIL MONUMENT SET A PK NAIL MONUMENT FOUND 0 PK NAIL W/ ALUMINUM DISC /:o SURVEY CONTROL POINT 18482 Maple 24" pe,formed by Arborist SURVEY LEGEND (!} PIEZOMETER LJ POWER POLE GUY WIRE ROOF DRAIN LIFT STATION SANITARY MANHOLE SANITARY CLEANOUT STORM MANHOLE STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION FFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. I' . · ' . I CONCRETE BITUMINOUS ------.-BUILDING SETBACK LINE --CTV--CABLE TV CON CRETE CURB --960 ____ CONTOUR EXISTING 71111 -L■ 0 I 20 I 40 I 161 A/C UNIT [g CABLE TV PEDESTAL FLARED END SECTION TREE CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS CONTOUR PROPOSED -0--0-0-0--0-GUARD RA I L SCALE IN FEET V I C I N I T y M A p TWP:117-RGE.23-SEC.07 Hennepin County 11] ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER ® ELECTRIC MANHOLE ® ELECTRIC METER rn ELECTRIC OUTLET 0 YARD LIGHT ¢ LIGHT POLE (1) FIBER OPTIC MANHOLE q FIRE DEPT. HOOK UP f'" FLAG POLE [0 FUEL PUMP FUEL TANK [i] PROPANE TANK © GAS METER [i8IJ GAS VAL VE © GAS MANHOLE @cJ GENERATOR EB GUARD POST 181 HAND HOLE ['l MAIL BOX TREE CONIFEROUS REMOVED --OT --DRAIN TILE TREE DECIDUOUS REMOVED --ELC--ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND (i) IT] (Q) TELEPHONE MANHOLE -x--x-FENCE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL --FD --FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND UTILITY MANHOLE --GAS--GAS UNDERGROUND IQ] UTILITY PEDESTAL IY] UTILITY VAULT @ WATERMAIN MANHOLE @ WATER METER CO, WATER SPIGOT 1i!i» WELL MONITORING WELL (]) CURB STOP IXl GATE VALVE "Cf HYDRANT IRRIGATION VALVE POST INDICATOR VAL VE --u-SIGN [sa] SOIL BORING --oHu--OVERHEAD UTILITY TREE LINE -->--SANITARY SEWER --»--STORM SEWER --TEL--TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND RETAINING WALL -- UTL--UTILITY UNDERGROUND --I --WATERMAIN TRAFFIC SIGNAL RAILROAD TRACKS RAILROAD SIGNAL RAILROAD SWITCH SATELLITE DISH WETLAND BUFFER SIGN CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FILE NO. 35750-003 i SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. ORONO, MINNESOTA PREPARED FOR: 1 $...... p '--" 14000 25TH AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 120 PLYMOUTH MN 55447 (952) 476-6000 WWW.SATHRE.COM ZEHNDER HOMES 1 1/8" = 1' Scale: 11/24/2021Date: Revision #:Brian McCullough The Mattson Residence Landscape Plan: McCullough Design Services, LLC Landscape Design by: Flower, Grass Each 10 1 Grass Dwarf fountain Flower, Perennial Each 16 2 Catmint Each 6 3 Grass, k.f. reed Each 32 4 Hosta Shrub, Deciduous 5 Gal.7 5 Hydrangea, Annabelle White 5 Gal.8 6 Hydrangea little quickfire 3 Gal.10 7 Weigela, spilled Wine Shrub, Evergreen Conifer 5 Gal.31 8 Arborvitae, Globe Tree, Deciduous 3"25 9 regal prince oak or d.p. birch 4"2 10 Linden, Boulevard Tree, Evergreen 8' BB 1 11 Spruce North Star 8' bb.3 12 Spruce, cupressina Legend Size Qty Common Name 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 11 121212 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 6 6 6 6 8 888 7 7 7 7 7 7 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 11 33 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 777744 4 4 4 4 44444444 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 3 3 10 10 7 5 ' S e t b a c k F r o m L a k e 7 5 ' Se t bac k Fro m L ake Remove Existing Wall Add Low grow No Mow Turf Add Low grow No Mow Turf e x i s t i n g S t a i r s 12 Firebowls 20x40 pool turf st e p p e r s t o s t a i r w a y dog run gravel driveway per survey gate This Drawing remains property of McCullough Design Services, LLC., and no use of shall be made without their consent. MDS, LLC. assumes no responsibility for accuracy, zoning compliance, structural integrity, and all details and dimensions turf turfturfturfturfturfturf turf turf turf turf turf turf turf turf b e d a n d m u l c h a r o u n d e x i s t i n g t r e e s Date: Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 940 North Arm Drive Prepared By: Sathre-Bergquist 4/29/2022 B Proposed Driveway 3,385 C Proposed Portico 64 (Example) (Garage) (24' x 30') (720 S.F.) A Proposed House/Garage In the following table, identify all items of Proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict Proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, Identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet) SB Job Number: 99595-131 Prepared by: JRS Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle One) Step 1: Proposed HARDCOVER 3,536 F Screen Porch 280 G Proposed Paver Patio 1568 D Proposed Sidewalk 14 E Proposed Terrace 388 J Proposed Concrete Pad 26 K Existing Ret. Walls (inside OHW setback) 67 H Proposed Pool 800 I Prop. Ret. Wall (inside OHW setback)55 N Prop. Dock Stairs (outside OHW setback)145 O Proposed Paver Steppers 126 L Prop. Landing (inside OHW setback)24 M Prop. Landing (outside OHW setback)24 R S P Proposed Steps 100 Q V W T U Z (1) Total Proposed Hardcover 10602 X Y Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684): I Prop. Ret. Wall (inside OHW setback)55 K Existing Ret. Walls (inside OHW setback)131 (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 186 % This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contrained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)]10,416.00 (4) Total Lot Area 43,378 Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)]24.01% BILL OF MATERIALS DESCRIPTIONPART NUMBERQTY Stl Stp 4' 3" Diagonal Corner Bench (3x3) (bead) (Internal) SD-5101D1 TBDSDS-0000SP1 Stl Pnl 6" R Corner Angle - S/1 (use with ST-9001CR for 6" radius corner) ST-0601SCR4 Stl Pnl 72" Plain - 1 RibSTB-72012 Stl Pnl 84" Plain - 1 RibSTB-84014 Stl Pnl 90 Deg Corner - S/1ST-9001CR4 Stl Pnl 96" Plain - 2 RibsSTB-960210 20' X 40' RECTANGLE 06"R/90DEG STEEL WALL POOL SYSTEM DWG #: GS-17988 PAGE 1 OF 3 DATE: 11/29/2021 REV: - AREA (SqFt): 800 PERIMETER: 120 EST. VOL (US Gal): 21,600 Signage must be permanantly attached around the perimeter of the pool. THIS DOCUMENT IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. Only Alpha Pool Products makes only those representations which are stated in its written warranty. Any other representations, statements, or contracts made by the dealer/contractor to the customer regarding any components produced by Only Alpha Pool Products are attributable to the dealer/contractor only. The dealer or contractor who sells or installs your pool is an independant contractor and is not an agent or employee of Only Alpha Pool Products. The construction methods illustrated here are suggestions and apply only to normal ground conditions. There may be additional precautions and/or methods of construction. The responsibility is the contractor's. -A safety line, with buoys, is to be permanently attached 1'-0" to the shallow side of the point of first slope change. -Different methods and precautions may be dictated by various ground conditions. This is to be determined by and is the responsibility of the contractor who is not an agent of the manufacturer of the component parts. -Installation is to be done in accordance with all federal, state and local building codes, as well as A.N.S.I./N.S.P.I. suggested standards. -BOTTOM SPECIFICATIONS MUST MEET OR EXCEED A.N.S.I./N.S.P.I./A.P.S.P. RECOMMENDED STANDARDS -'NO DIVING' signage must be permanently attached to the entire perimeter of the pool. See instructions with signage. -IT IS RECOMMENDED TO NOT INSTALL DIVING BOARDS AND/OR SLIDING EQUIPMENT ON RESIDENTIAL POOLS. If diving boards and/or sliding equipment is installed by the contractor, such diving boards and sliding equipment MUST BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE GUIDELINES ESTABLISHED BY ANSI/NSPI/ASPA RECOMMENDED STANDTARDS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL CODES AND REGULATIONS. *THIS DRAWING REPRESENTS CUSTOMER SPECIFICATIONS. *YOUR SIGNATURE ACKNOWLEDGES ACCEPTANCE. SIGN:___________________________ DATE:____________ BRACE / HARDWARE OPTIONS QTY PART NUMBER DESCRIPTION 10 ST-1002CCB Stl Brc C-Channel Turnbuckle Brace + Drive Stake 2 ST-1024ATB Stl Brc Auto-Cover Turnbuckle Brace + Drive Stake 2 ST-1004DM Stl Brc Deadman Plate 1 HW-2002 Hdw Steel/Rrd Kit 1 HW-2013 Hdw Steel Add-on Kit (3/8" Bolts-100, 3/8" Nuts-100) COPING QTY PART NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 HW-2018 Hdw Auto-Cover, No-Diving Plate(7/Bag) STB-8401 STB-7201 STB-8401 STB-9602STB-9602STB-9602STB-9602STB-9602 STB-8401 STB-7201 STB-8401 STB-9602STB-9602STB-9602STB-9602STB-9602 SDS-0000SP SD-5101D ST-9001CR(4PLCS) ST-0601SCR(4PCLS) 2 0 '-0 " 40'-0" 44'-83 4" CUSTOMER: GUARDIAN TAG: EXPERIENCE/MATTSON 20' X 40' RECTANGLE 06"R/90DEG STEEL WALL POOL SYSTEM DWG #: GS-17988 PAGE 2 OF 3 DATE: 11/29/2021 REV: - AREA (SqFt): 800 PERIMETER: 120 EST. VOL (US Gal): 21,600 Signage must be permanantly attached around the perimeter of the pool. C-CHANNEL BRACE THIS DOCUMENT IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. Only Alpha Pool Products makes only those representations which are stated in its written warranty. Any other representations, statements, or contracts made by the dealer/contractor to the customer regarding any components produced by Only Alpha Pool Products are attributable to the dealer/contractor only. The dealer or contractor who sells or installs your pool is an independant contractor and is not an agent or employee of Only Alpha Pool Products. The construction methods illustrated here are suggestions and apply only to normal ground conditions. There may be additional precautions and/or methods of construction. The responsibility is the contractor's. -A safety line, with buoys, is to be permanently attached 1'-0" to the shallow side of the point of first slope change. -Different methods and precautions may be dictated by various ground conditions. This is to be determined by and is the responsibility of the contractor who is not an agent of the manufacturer of the component parts. -Installation is to be done in accordance with all federal, state and local building codes, as well as A.N.S.I./N.S.P.I. suggested standards. -BOTTOM SPECIFICATIONS MUST MEET OR EXCEED A.N.S.I./N.S.P.I./A.P.S.P. RECOMMENDED STANDARDS -'NO DIVING' signage must be permanently attached to the entire perimeter of the pool. See instructions with signage. -IT IS RECOMMENDED TO NOT INSTALL DIVING BOARDS AND/OR SLIDING EQUIPMENT ON RESIDENTIAL POOLS. If diving boards and/or sliding equipment is installed by the contractor, such diving boards and sliding equipment MUST BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE GUIDELINES ESTABLISHED BY ANSI/NSPI/ASPA RECOMMENDED STANDTARDS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL CODES AND REGULATIONS. *THIS DRAWING REPRESENTS CUSTOMER SPECIFICATIONS. *YOUR SIGNATURE ACKNOWLEDGES ACCEPTANCE. SIGN:___________________________ DATE:____________ CONCRETE FOOTER 1-PIECE ANGLE BRACE STEEL POOL PANEL STAKE 2" POOL BASE 2' TURNBUCKLE 40'-0" 2 0 '-0 " ST-0601SCR(4PCLS) ST-9001CR(4PLCS) SD-5101D SDS-0000SP STB-9602 STB-9602 STB-9602 STB-9602 STB-9602 STB-8401 STB-7201 STB-8401 STB-9602 STB-9602 STB-9602 STB-9602 STB-9602 STB-8401 STB-7201 STB-8401 9'-0"14'-9" 1'-6" 14'-9" 2 '-0 " 1 6 '-0 " 2 '-0 " 5'-8" 3'-4" 2 0 '-0 " 5 '-8 "3 '-4 "40'-0" CUSTOMER: GUARDIAN TAG: EXPERIENCE/MATTSON Signage must be permanantly attached around the perimeter of the pool. THIS DOCUMENT IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. Only Alpha Pool Products makes only those representations which are stated in its written warranty. Any other representations, statements, or contracts made by the dealer/contractor to the customer regarding any components produced by Only Alpha Pool Products are attributable to the dealer/contractor only. The dealer or contractor who sells or installs your pool is an independant contractor and is not an agent or employee of Only Alpha Pool Products. The construction methods illustrated here are suggestions and apply only to normal ground conditions. There may be additional precautions and/or methods of construction. The responsibility is the contractor's. -A safety line, with buoys, is to be permanently attached 1'-0" to the shallow side of the point of first slope change. -Different methods and precautions may be dictated by various ground conditions. This is to be determined by and is the responsibility of the contractor who is not an agent of the manufacturer of the component parts. -Installation is to be done in accordance with all federal, state and local building codes, as well as A.N.S.I./N.S.P.I. suggested standards. -BOTTOM SPECIFICATIONS MUST MEET OR EXCEED A.N.S.I./N.S.P.I./A.P.S.P. RECOMMENDED STANDARDS -'NO DIVING' signage must be permanently attached to the entire perimeter of the pool. See instructions with signage. -IT IS RECOMMENDED TO NOT INSTALL DIVING BOARDS AND/OR SLIDING EQUIPMENT ON RESIDENTIAL POOLS. If diving boards and/or sliding equipment is installed by the contractor, such diving boards and sliding equipment MUST BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE GUIDELINES ESTABLISHED BY ANSI/NSPI/ASPA RECOMMENDED STANDTARDS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL CODES AND REGULATIONS. 20' X 40' RECTANGLE 06"R/90DEG STEEL WALL POOL SYSTEM DWG #: GS-17988 PAGE 3 OF 3 DATE: 11/29/2021 REV: - AREA (SqFt): 800 PERIMETER: 120 EST. VOL (US Gal): 21,600 *THIS DRAWING REPRESENTS CUSTOMER SPECIFICATIONS. *YOUR SIGNATURE ACKNOWLEDGES ACCEPTANCE. SIGN:___________________________ DATE:____________ LINEAR LENGTH: 720 44'-83 4" 40'-0" 20'-0" ST-0601SCR(4PCLS) ST-9001CR(4PLCS) SD-5101D SDS-0000SP STB-9602STB-9602STB-9602STB-9602STB-9602 STB-8401 STB-7201 STB-8401 STB-9602STB-9602STB-9602STB-9602STB-9602 STB-8401 STB-7201 STB-8401 9 '-0 " 20'-0" 20'-0" 20'-0" 20'-0" 1 '-0 "1 '-0 " 7 '-0 " 1'-0" 1'-0" 7'-0" 1 '-0 " 0 '-9 1 2 " 0 '-9 1 2 " 0 '-1 1 " CUSTOMER: GUARDIAN TAG: EXPERIENCE/MATTSON STEP PROFILE SDS-0000SP 20' STRAIGHT STEP 7' SUNDECK FIRST TREAD 3 TREAD BEAD, INTERNAL, AUTO 1. LA22-000014 Zehnder Homes, Inc. – Eric Zehnder, 940 North Arm Drive, requests an average lakeshore setback variance in order to construct a pool, patio, and retaining wall to the lakeside of the home. Eric Zehnder, Applicant, was present. City Planner Oakden gave a report on the item, noting the Applicant is requesting an average lakeshore variance (ALS) to elevate the grade over 42 inches in height. A new home is being constructed on the property and the lot has a large sloping yard on the side of Lake Minnetonka. In 2001 a previous owner removed an existing home and did not restore that grade after removing the basement level leaving a large depression in the sloped lake yard. The Applicant is proposing a pool, patio, and retaining wall to the lakeside of the home forward of the ASL. These improvements are proposed to be about 11.5 feet above existing grade. Oakden showed elevations on screen. The Applicant has identified the grade left from the previous removal of the home as well as the sloped lake yard as practical difficulties; Staff finds the grade is a unique challenge to the property and not created by the current homeowner. The proposed project will create a more natural grading pattern similar to neighboring properties. However the property owner can install these improvements without elevating the grade by lowering the proposed pool and patio by using stairs to access the space from the walkout basement of the house. Elevating these improvements is seen as convenience and not necessary for the use of the property. Staff can support a variance to fill the hole left by the previous owner and use the 956 elevation contour as an estimated natural grade. Staff is challenged finding practical difficulties to support raising the grade 8 feet above the 956 elevation. Planning Staff recommends denial of the application. Eric Zehnder, Zehnder Homes, 10300 Tenth Ave N, Plymouth, noted they are not proposing the 11 foot difference in the Staff report. He understands the existing grade, and said if it had been backfilled correctly to begin with they would be at the 956 elevation and would not need to get a variance to go up to 959.5. In his eyes the variance they are asking for is only 4.5 feet from what would be allowed by ordinance if it was backfilled correctly. Mr. Zehnder noted no one came out against the application, the neighbors to the north are fine with it; the neighbors to the south winter in Florida and he has not had a chance to talk to them about it yet. McCutcheon is looking at the contour lines with the neighbors and it seems that they align. When Mr. Zehnder says “backfilled correctly” how far towards the lake is the backfill? Mr. Zehnder showed the contour lines on screen noting where the basement was dug out. He stated if they had backfilled the basement to meet existing grades they would have been a nice level 956 all the way across and then they would be at 959.5’ without even asking for a variance and to go up to 964’ is much less of a variance than it seems to be right now. Oakden noted the existing grade as it sits today, the elevation is 952.5and the proposed top of the patio is 964 which is where the 11.5 feet from today’s grade to what they are proposing comes from. The Applicant is talking about the natural grade, that Staff is supportive of, which is at the 956 and if the previous homeowner had backfilled and followed the contours of the neighbor’s slope, 956 should be the natural grade. Unfortunately because the old home’s basement was not graded out it is much lower than what the neighbors have. Ressler asked if the Applicant has any surveys of the grade for neighboring properties to set the expectation that the natural slope should support the 968? Whether it is a big or little variance it needs to be supported and to use as an example that there is precedence of neighboring natural slope being at 964. Mr. Zehnder replied on the survey it shows the contour lines and they continue through on a pretty consistent basis for the neighbors. James Mattson, 940 North Arm Drive, was talking to his neighbor Matt Gettman who mentioned the neighbor north of Mr. Gettman did the exact same thing with the variance process to level off their pool given the slope of the land. Kirchner noted Mr. Ressler’s comment that it must be about practical difficulties and he has yet to hear about what those practical difficulties are. Mr. Zehnder stated the grade is not where it should be if it was backfilled correctly. The dramatic slope of the lot is a practical difficulty, also. Kirchner shared the practical difficulty could be solved using Staff’s solution of using stairs. Mr. Zehnder thinks every variance is a convenience and that Mr. Mattson would prefer to walk out right onto his patio level without going down steps. Kraemer clarified if they take the 956 elevation they are allowed to go 42 inch above that? Oakden replied Staff would support a variance request if it was in the 42 inch range of that 956 elevation. Libby asked Staff if the Applicant would still need a variance for the 956? Oakden replied that is correct and today if they wanted a building permit at a strict reading of the Code, they have 42 inches above existing grade. Libby asked if in the original recommendation for denial Staff had taken into consideration the severity of the slope towards the lake and drainage from roof, gutters, and pool. Oakden replied this specific plan was sent to the City Engineer to review for drainage and waterways. The engineer said that this pattern as proposed would manage drainage for the house and improvements just fine. Chair McCutcheon opened the public hearing at 6:26 p.m. Chair McCutcheon closed the public hearing at 6:26 p.m. Kirchner thinks Staff has gone out of their way to present something that is reasonable. He does not see practical difficulty and would support denial at this time. McCutcheon thinks it is all about the definition of the previous grade and he can see where there is some contention. He tends to believe Staff’s expertise and it looks like they were pretty accurate with their measurement. Erickson has some experience in demolishing houses and one thing the City has made clear is that any rights one may have had due to the structure being there will disappear when the structure disappears. For example a non-conforming setback, lot size, etc. He noted when there was a house there, and it was a certain height, those things are not issues that apply to this. Erickson thinks Staff have done a good job looking at the issues and supports denial. Kraemer is not hearing anything that meets practical difficulty. Libby agreed. Kirchner moved, Libby seconded, to deny LA22-000014, 940 North Arm Drive, Variances. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. Date Application Received: 03.23.2022 Date Application Considered as Complete: 03.28.2022 60-Day Review Period Expires: 05.27.2022 To: Mark McCutcheon and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Laura Oakden , LLO Date: April 18, 2022 Subject: LA22-000014, Eric Zehnder, 940 North Arm Drive, Variance, Public Hearing Background The applicant is currently constructing a new home on the property, issued on July 2021. The site has a large sloped yard to Lake Minnetonka. In 2011, a previous owner removed the then existing home, and did not restore the grade after removing the basement area leave a large depression in the property. The applicant is proposing to use some of the earth excavated from the new house project and fill in the large hole from the previous building to even out of the yard between the house and the lake. In this area, a pool, patio, and retaining wall are proposed. The average lakeshore setback allowed for these accessory structure improvements but limited the allowed height at 42 inches (3.5 feet) above existing grade. This improvements are proposed to be approximately 11.5 feet above existing grade. Staff has analyzed the slope with the neighboring properties and determined the current project would still be roughly 8 feet above the estimated natural grade of the neighboring properties. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the unique existing grade left over from the removal of a previous home and slope in the lake yard as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance. Additionally, they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds the grade is a unique challenge to the property and not created by the current homeowner. The proposed project will create a more natural grading pattern consistent with the neighboring properties. However, the property owner can install these improvements without elevating the existing grade by lowering the proposed pool or patio to the existing contours and using stairs to access the space from the house. Elevating the improvements is a convenience to the homeowners and not a necessary for the use of the property. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-330 – Pool Setbacks: Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance to elevate the grade lakeward of the setback over 42 inches in height. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends denial. FILE # LA22-000014 April 18, 2022 Page 2 of 5 Section 78-330 – Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT Lot Area Lot Width Required 43,560 s.f. (1 acres) 140’ Actual 43,378 s.f. ( 0.99 acre) 140’ @ 75’ /120’ @ OHWL Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 – Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Tier Total Area in Zone Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier 1 43,378 s.f. 10,844.5 s.f. (25 %)* 7,386 s.f. (17 %)* 10,305 s.f. (24 %) *Calculated by Staff Applicable Regulations: Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (78-1279) The average lakeshore setback allows construction of patios and accessory structures less than 42 inches above existing grade. The patio and pool as proposed are shown to have a final elevation of 964. The lowest abutting existing grade to the project is 952.5. The project will be elevated 11.5 feet above existing grade where only 42 inches (3.5 feet) is permitted. The extremely low grade was created from the demolition of a previous home (2011) which is inconsistent with the neighboring, ‘natural’ grading patterns. Following the contour of the natural slope of the neighboring property suggests the 956 contour would be more representative of the existing natural grade, which staff could support. The applicant is requesting a taller improvement with a final grade at 964, which would create an 8 foot elevation. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties DISTRICT LR-1B Required Proposed Street 17.5’ 140’ Side (North) 10’ 35’ Side (South) 10’ 30’ Lakeshore 75’ 75’ Average Lakeshore The proposed pool and patio project is a permitted improvement within the average lakeshore setback with a 3.5 feet height limit. The proposed improvement has a maximum final grade 11.5 feet above existing grad where 3.5 is permitted. FILE # LA22-000014 April 18, 2022 Page 3 of 5 also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed property will not impact the sight lines of the lake for the neighboring property. The variance would meet this standard. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The property is being used for a single family home consistent with the comprehensive plan. The project is proposing to install a patio and pool which are accessory improvements to the primary use of the site, which is the house. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The applicant states “Due to the existing grade of the land, it is a difficult lot to build on and the added fill to bring the pool up to the desired grade does not impact neighbors on either side and will not at all impact any site lines.” b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The slope in the lakeyard and irregular contour for the neighborhood were not created by the homeowner. c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance would permit elevating the grade approximately 8 feet above neighboring, natural grades, contrary to the character of the locality. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as house with a patio and pool are an allowed use in the LR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The grading on the parcel is unique to this property left over from an older home demolition project. Elevating the proposed pool and patio above 42 inches in height is not unique. However, raising the grade 11.5 feet does appear excessive. FILE # LA22-000014 April 18, 2022 Page 4 of 5 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The unfilled hole supports the argument for deviation from the strict reading, as this condition is not found in the area. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The proposed project to elevate the grade for the site to support accessory improvements is secondary to the main use of the site. The property has a home being constructed for use of the property. Staff finds this standard is not met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the variance is contrary to the intent of the chapter as the property meeting the primary use of the home on the site. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Granting the variance is a convenience. The proposed accessory structure improvements are able to be constructed on the existing grade which would meet the city code without the need for any variances. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Engineer Comments 1. Drainage patterns appear to be okay 2. Proposed retaining wall will need to be designed by a licensed engineer and reviewed by the City Building official . Wall with footing will exceed 4 feet and appear to be built on top of fill. 3. Erosion control plan should be adjusted to provide double silt fence above the wetland boundary. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the property have reasonable use of the site? 3. Can the proposed improvements be constructed without a variance? 4. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 5. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff can support a variance to fill in the hole left by the previous owner to use the 956 contour as the estimated natural grade for the area. Staff is challenged finding practical difficulties necessary to support the raising of the grade 8 feet about existing, ‘natural’ grades. Planning Staff recommends denial of the average lakeshore setback variance. FILE # LA22-000014 April 18, 2022 Page 5 of 5 List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Survey and Images Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Property Owners List and Map AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: LLO Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By 1. Purpose. The applicant is requesting to reconstruct the retaining walls in the 75’ lake yard with expansion due to the change in building materials. 2. Background. The Council reviewed this application on April 11th and at the March 14th City Council Meetings. The applicant noted the existing block wall are failing and is proposing to replace it with a boulder retaining walls which is considered a footprint encroachment due to the material size. The applicant amended their plans based on the City Council’s direction to follow the same footprint of the existing improvements. Per council’s direction, the applicant has submitted a report from a professional engineer noting the existing wall is failing. (Exhibit B). 3. Engineering Comments: Adam Edwards, City Administer and City Engineer, has reviewed and found the analysis and recommendation are sound and in keeping with standard practices. He noted the findings state the wall should be replaced. The use of the boulder wall construction would be the preferred option as it is less disruptive to the lake yard than an in-kind replacement due to the installation requirements of a block wall. The project that is being proposed make since from an engineering perspective. 4. 15.99 Deadline. The applicant made a complete application on January 18, 2022. The original review period has been extended by staff, the applicant further extended the review period to July 17, 2022. 5. Public Comment One written comment was received in support of the project. The same neighbor, Melissa Santrach at 1700 Bohns Point Rd, attended the meeting and spoke in support of the project. Staff Recommendation. Planning Staff recommends approval of the variance as revised. The retaining wall follows the path of the existing wall, and the variance is necessary only due to the change in size of the wall materials. Staff believes the replacement of a concrete block wall with a boulder wall more completely meet the goals of the ordinance, which in part, are intended to preserve a natural shoreline. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt the approval resolution. Exhibits A. Draft Resolution B. Engineering Report C. Propose Plan Information D. Council Minutes 04/11/2022 References City Council Packet 04/11/2022 City Council Packet 03/15/2022 Planning Commission Packet 02/22/22 Item No.: 13 Date: May 9, 2022 Item Description: LA21-000076 – Yardscapes, Inc. - Lincoln Danforth, 1720 Bohns Point Road, Variance – Resolution 7265 Presenter: Laura Oakden Planner Agenda Section: Planning Department Report CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7265 1 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-1279 FILE NO. LA21 -000076 WHEREAS, on January 18, 2022, Yardscapes o/b/o Christian Harker (“Applicants”), applied for a variance from the City Code for the property addressed 1720 Bohns Point Road and legally described as: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1855 (hereinafter the “Property”); WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow reconstruction of a retaining wall within the lakeyard and WHEREAS, on February 22, 2022, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on February 22, 2022, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance; and WHEREAS, on March 14, 2022, the City Council reviewed the application and directed the applicant to amend their plans WHEREAS, on April 11, 2022, the City Council reviewed the application directed the application to clarify the existing conditions of the current retaining wall; and WHEREAS, on May 9, 2022, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7265 2 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA21-000076. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the LR-1B Zoning District. 3. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 4. Applicant has applied for the following variance: a. Retaining walls within the 75 foot lakeyard 5. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. Preserving and protecting the existing slope in the lake yard is in harmony with the intent of the ordinance. The proposed retaining walls are of natural materials and will be screened with vegetation to maintain the rural nature of the lake. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed retaining walls are protecting the slope on the property consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The owner proposes to install retaining wall improvements which are residential in nature and reasonable from a residential scope. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The owner has proposed retaining walls as a solution which will protect against failure of the slope. The existing slope of the lake yard was not a result of actions by the owner. and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality The variance to permit retaining wall structures within the 75-foot setback will help to maintain the existing slope and character of the area. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7265 3 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as single family home is an allowed use in the LR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. . The slope of the property combined with the pre-existing improvements is a unique condition to the subject property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The subject property’s specific slope and existing improvements are creating conditions which do not apply to adjacent properties. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Granting a lake setback variance to allow the retaining walls within the 75-foot lake setback is reasonable and necessary to preserve the property rights of the owner and supported by the vulnerable lake yard slope on the property. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the lakeyard setback variance allowing the retaining walls within the 75-foot lake setback will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any way be contrary to the ordinances. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The location of the slope in the lakeyard does not support another, conforming location for the retaining wall. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1379 to allow reconstruction of retaining walls within the lakeyard, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the survey dated 4/5/2022 submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7265 4 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project must happen within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (05/09/2023). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this ______ day of ________________, 20__. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: _______________________________ ________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor 17 2 5 B O H N S P O I N T R O A D 18407 N : \ P r o j e c t s \ 1 8 0 4 5 \ 1 8 0 4 5 R R . d w g , 4 / 1 9 / 2 0 1 8 1 : 0 6 : 3 5 P M CC E x h i b i t A LA21-000076 Ex i s t i n g W a l l i n Yellow April 25, 2022 Christian Harker 1720 Bohns Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Submitted by email: christianharker@yahoo.com Re: Retaining Wall Evaluation Project Location: 1720 Bohns Point Road, Wayzata, Minnesota Criterium File No.: 22-6174 Dear Mr. Harker: At your request, a visual inspection of the retaining wall at the above property has been completed. The report that follows has been prepared based on that inspection. This inspection was performed by Paul Schimnowski, PE. My work includes the following: 1. Visual observations during a site visit on April 20, 2022. 2. Observe factors influencing the performance of the structure. 3. Provide a written report containing the following: a. Scope of services. b. Observations, site characteristics, and data deemed pertinent by me. c. Discussion of structural factors influencing the performance of this wall. d. Conclusions and any recommendations for further investigation and remedial or preventative measures. e. You asked me to pay special attention to the forward movement of the wall, horizontal gaps in the face of the wall, deteriorated block at the top of the wall, and erosion at the base of the wall SUMMARY In my professional opinion, the overall structural condition of this concrete masonry unit (CMU) retaining wall is considered to be poor when compared to others of similar age and construction type. The wall is failing and is reaching the end of its expected useful life. Due to its deteriorated condition, options for repairs to re-establish structural stability of the wall are limited and may not be cost-effective in extending the life of the wall. Replacement should be anticipated in the next few years. SPECIFIC ITEMS NOTED & ASSOCIATED RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. The top of the wall is displaced outward by about 2 to 3 inches near the center and north sections of the wall. 2. Horizontal gaps have developed at the wall face due to wall displacement and settlement. 3. Some of the cap units, block, and mortar are deteriorated due to freeze-thaw damage. 4. The cores of some of the blocks are exposed. This will allow water to infiltrate and further deteriorate the block. 5. Structurally significant erosion has occurred at the base of the wall which has exposed the footing. For a wall of this type, the bottom of the footing should be at least 42-inches below 1720 Bohns Point Road, Wayzata, Minnesota April 25, 2022 Page | 2 grade. In order to establish proper frost protection of the footings and structural stability of the wall, several feet of fill will need to be added at the front of the wall, and/or the wall will need to be underpinned with helical piers or a similar method. 6. The footing of the wall has been exposed and undermined from wildlife burrowing activity. See Item 5 above for recommended repairs. 7. Refer to the attached photos for additional notes and observations. OPTIONS FOR REPLACEMENT 1. For this location, a rock/boulder wall similar to the newer wall at the north end of the failing wall could be considered. Alternatively, a segmental block (i.e. Versa-Lok, Anchor) retaining wall could be designed and installed. These types of walls do not require frost-depth footings. They are constructed on aggregate leveling pads 1 to 2 feet below grade. Figure 1: Existing, nearby stone retaining wall 2. Replacing the wall with a similar CMU wall would require construction of a concrete footing at least 42-inches below grade. The front-to-back width of the footing could exceed 6-feet. Generally, these types of walls will disturb more area than rock or segmental block walls discussed in Item 1 above. DESCRIPTION OF TERMS Terms used in this report to describe the condition of observable components and systems are listed and defined below. It should be noted that a term applied to an overall system does not preclude that a part or a section of the system or component may be in different condition: Excellent- Component or system is in “as new” condition, requiring no rehabilitation, and should perform in full accordance with expected performance. Good- Component or system is sound and performing its function. Although it may show signs of normal wear and tear, some minor rehabilitation work may be required. Fair- Component or system falls into one or more of the following categories: a) Evidence of previous repairs not in compliance with commonly accepted standards, b) Workmanship not in compliance with commonly accepted standards, c) Component or system is obsolete, d) Component or system approaching end of expected performance. Repair or replacement is required to prevent further deterioration or to prolong expected life. Poor- Component or system has either failed or cannot be relied upon to continue performing its original function as a result of having exceeded its expected performance, excessive 1720 Bohns Point Road, Wayzata, Minnesota April 25, 2022 Page | 3 deferred maintenance, or state of disrepair. Present condition could contribute or cause the deterioration of other adjoining elements or systems. Repair or replacement is required. SCOPE OF SERVICES and LIMITATIONS The report is not to be considered a guarantee of condition and no warranty is implied. Our observations are non-destructive, and limited to those portions of the site/wall that could be visually examined without excavation, removing surface finishes, disassembling equipment, or removing finishes, furnishings and equipment. Our scope of services did not include an exhaustive technical investigation. No material sampling, analytic tests, precise measurements or engineering calculations were performed. This includes but is not limited to: compaction testing, soil sampling, global stability calculations. We did not determine whether the wall and its operation or use conform to any city codes, or regulations, or restrictions that may be enforced within the jurisdiction. As Professional Engineers, it is our responsibility to evaluate available evidence relevant to the purpose of this inspection. We are not, however, responsible for conditions that could not be seen or were not within the scope of our service at the time of the inspection. DESCRIPTION OF WALL/SITE: This wall is a single tier, concrete masonry unit (CMU) retaining wall approximately 100-feet in length with a maximum exposed height of about 7.5-feet. The wall is located on the eastern shore of Bohns Point. DOCUMENT/INFORMATION REVIEW No documents were provided. CONCLUSION In summary, I consider the structural condition of this retaining wall to be poor when compared to others of similar age and construction type. The wall is reaching the end of its expected useful life. Replacement should be anticipated in the next few years. This professional opinion is based on the information that you provided (verbal, photos, documentation) and my non-destructive observations at the site. Keep in mind that without invasive investigation, such as described above in scope of service, not everything about the condition of the existing retaining wall can be known. Further, improper water control, flood events, or extensive soil saturation can quickly change the condition of a retaining wall. Opinions and recommendations in this report are limited to the scope of work. This report has been prepared in strict confidence with you as our client. Reliance upon our report by other parties is strictly prohibited. If you choose to share our report, you agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Engineer from any third-party action. No reproduction or re-use is permitted without express written consent. Further, we will not release this report to anyone without your permission. If additional documentation or information is made available for review, I reserve the right to amend or add to the opinions and observations presented in this report. 1720 Bohns Point Road, Wayzata, Minnesota April 25, 2022 Page | 4 Please call with any additional questions you may have. Thank you for the opportunity to be of assistance to you. Sincerely, Paul Schimnowski, P.E. MN #40126 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Paul Schimnowski, P.E. Date: April 25, 2022 License #: 40126 (MN) Location 1720 Bohns Point Road, Wayzata, MN Photos Taken by: Paul D Schimnowski, P.E. Inspection Date: April 20, 2022 1 View along top of wall. Outward displacement noted. 2 View along top of wall. Outward displacement and deteriorated block noted. 3 View along front of wall. Outward displacement noted. 4 View along front of wall. Outward displacement at top of wall noted. 5 View along wall. Outward displacement and deteriorated CMU noted. 6 Measurement photo of wall displacement at corner. Location 1720 Bohns Point Road, Wayzata, MN Photos Taken by: Paul D Schimnowski, P.E. Inspection Date: April 20, 2022 7 Deteriorated block at top of wall.8 Horizontal gaps at wall due to outward wall displacement. 9 Erosion and undermining at front of wall.10 Erosion and undermining at front of wall. 11 Undermined footing at front of wall.12 Undermined footing at front of wall. 17 2 5 B O H N S P O I N T R O A D 18407 N : \ P r o j e c t s \ 1 8 0 4 5 \ 1 8 0 4 5 R R . d w g , 4 / 1 9 / 2 0 1 8 1 : 0 6 : 3 5 P M CC E x h i b i t A LA21-000076 Ex i s t i n g W a l l i n Yellow 15. LA21-000076 – YARDSCAPES, INC. O/B/O LINCOLN DANFORTH, 1720 BOHNS POINT ROAD, REQUESTS, VARIANCES City Planner Oakden gave a presentation and stated the Applicant is proposing to replace the concrete block retaining wall within the 75 foot lakeyard setback. The property abuts Lake Minnetonka with a large slope along the shoreline. The City Council reviewed the application at the March 14, 2022 meeting and gave the Applicant direction to follow the same footprint as the existing retaining wall and to work to bring the project closer to an in-kind replacement. The Applicant amended their original plans to follow the existing wall footprint. The existing wall is constructed of concrete block and the new walls are proposed to be constructed from boulders. By their nature, the boulders create a larger footprint then the existing concrete block creating a new expansion in the 75’ lakeyard. A variance is required because of the sizing of the boulder material. Staff recommends approval of the variance as revised. The Applicant shared that he inherited the retaining wall, it is deteriorating, and is likely to collapse into the lake. He submitted photos to the Staff showing the mortar joints are falling apart and some of the blocks are starting to degrade. The reason they would like to use the boulders is because the adjoining property already has this form of boulder wall and it would have a homogenous, natural look. Mayor Walsh shared he does not see a practical difficulty and without that, one cannot get a variance. He has been out to the site and does not see any evidence of the wall failing. He would like to see evidence from the Applicant or an engineer’s report. Mayor Walsh noted they have told everyone who comes before the City Council wanting additional square footage that the answer is no unless there is a real practical difficulty. The Applicant stated there is a very loose-fashioned footing with a trench that the wall was built upon. He noted he can get an engineer to come in and talk about the likelihood of the wall failing. Mayor Walsh would like to try to find a solution and work with the Applicant; however, the City Council has told others no in some very dire circumstances. He noted the City Attorney will tell him they must have a practical difficulty to give a variance and the City can be sued if they do not have something that is true and accurate. Mayor Walsh wants to help the Applicant get where he needs to go and is trying to help him because there is no visual evidence that the wall is going to fall over. Johnson suggested getting an engineer to look at it and then presenting the findings to the City Council. Attorney Mattick stated the City Council must vote yes or no by May 18 as that is the timeline for the 120 days. If the Applicant is working with an engineer they can email Ms. Oakden to get an extension. Johnson moved, Crosby seconded, to table LA21-000076 until the May 9, 2022 City Council meeting. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: RO Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of the action item is to provide the city council an update on the 2022 Budget progress through the end of the first quarter. 2. Summary. The first quarter General Fund year to date budget to actual comparisons are included with this memo. They are as of the end of March which represents 25% of the year. Revenues are currently at 14.4% of budget with expenditures at 22.84% of budget. 3. General Fund Revenues. The low revenue percentage is normal for the first quarter. The timing of revenue streams account for the low revenue percentage for the quarter. The first property tax receipts, representing 50.3% of the budget, will not be received until June. Various state grants (Other Governmental Revenue) will also not be received until later in the year. For comparison purposes, 2021 1st quarter revenues were at 16.5% with 2020 revenues at 16.1%. Both years ended over budget for revenues. A revenue graph is included to illustrate the typically low 1st quarter revenues. 4. General Fund Expenditures. At 22.8%, the overall expenditure amounts are on target for the year. At the end of the first quarter in 2021, we were at 21.9% and ended the year at 101.5%. 2021’s overages were due to increased expenditures at the golf course and the additional expenditures related to the Spring Park service contract. Both of the items were offset by revenues. Although some adjustments have been made, the expenditure statement should be view as non-adjusted. There are no departments that are of concern at this point in the year. 5. Investments. A listing of investments is included with this memo. While interest rates remain low, the Federal Reserve has increased rates by 75 basis points this year and is likely to raise rates throughout the year. Interest earnings through March are $20,286 on total investments of $14,534,587. 6. Staff Analysis. In summary, the overall General Fund budget is looking good through the 1st quarter. We will have a much better revenue estimate in six weeks when we have received the 1st half tax settlement. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED No Action - Staff update. Exhibits A. Revenue Summary B. Revenue Detail C. Revenue Graphs/Tables D. Expenditure Summary E. Expenditure Detail F. Vendor Listing G. Investments Item No.: 14 Date: May 9, 2022 Item Description: First Quarter Financial Report Presenter: Ron Olson Finance Director Agenda Section: Finance Report Department March 31 Budget Percent Dec 31 Percent March 31 Budget Balance Percent Taxes - 4,936,140 0.00%4,841,335 98.08%- 5,013,596 5,013,596 0.00% Licenses & Permits 135,692 532,200 25.50%611,442 114.89%118,871 585,200 466,329 20.31% Other Governmental 2,740 268,000 1.02%522,999 195.15%31,683 403,000 371,317 7.86% Charges for Service 1,337,612 3,160,460 42.32%3,466,343 109.68%1,263,891 3,440,200 2,176,309 36.74% Fines 25,677 70,100 36.63%85,831 122.44%15,673 75,000 59,327 20.90% Miscellaneous - 2,000 0.00%4 0.21%- 2,000 2,000 0.00% Golf Course 508 188,000 0.27%383,216 203.84%359 338,000 337,641 0.11% Interest 143 70,500 0.20%70,500 100.00%178 80,500 80,322 0.22% Other Sources & Transfers 23,758 33,100 71.78%3,409 10.30%3,220 38,100 34,880 8.45% 1,526,130 9,260,500 16.48%9,985,079 107.82%1,433,876 9,975,596 8,541,720 14.37% AnnualQuarter City of Orono Revenue Summary with Comparison to Budget For The 3 Months Ending March 31, 2021 - 22 2021 2022 Exhibit A - Revenue Summary Page 1 of 27 CITY OF ORONO REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 3 MONTHS ENDING MARCH 31, 2022 GENERAL FUND PERIOD MARCH 31, 2022 BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 25 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/06/2022 07:58AM PAGE: 1 TAXES 101-31010 CURRENT AD VALOREM TAXES .00 .00 4,992,096.00 4,992,096.00 .0 101-31020 DELINQUENT AD VALOREM TAXES .00 .00 20,000.00 20,000.00 .0 101-31040 FISCAL DISPARITIES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-31050 PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-31060 FORFEITED TAX SALE APPORTIONMT .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-31070 RENT CREDIT .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-31900 PENALTIES AND INTEREST-TAXES .00 .00 1,500.00 1,500.00 .0 TOTAL TAXES .00 .00 5,013,596.00 5,013,596.00 .0 LICENSES & PERMITS 101-32100 BUSINESS LICENSES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-32110 BEER & LIQUOR LICENSES 625.00 625.00 7,100.00 6,475.00 8.8 101-32120 CIGARETTE LICENSES 500.00 500.00 500.00 .00 100.0 101-32130 COMMERCIAL DOCK LICENSES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-32140 SET UP LICENSES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-32150 SEPTIC LICENSES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-32170 GARBAGE HAULERS LICENSES 75.00 75.00 1,100.00 1,025.00 6.8 101-32180 OTHER BUSINESS LICENSE/PERMIT 30.00 30.00 8,000.00 7,970.00 .4 101-32230 RENTAL LICENSES 100.00 100.00 2,000.00 1,900.00 5.0 101-32240 DOG LICENSES ( 15.00) ( 15.00).00 15.00 .0 101-32510 BUILDING PERMITS 99,197.96 99,197.96 475,000.00 375,802.04 20.9 101-32520 ZONING PERMIT 50.00 50.00 1,500.00 1,450.00 3.3 101-32530 MECHANICAL/SEPTIC/OTHER 11,868.73 11,868.73 60,000.00 48,131.27 19.8 101-32590 PLUMBING PERMIT 6,439.75 6,439.75 30,000.00 23,560.25 21.5 TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS 118,871.44 118,871.44 585,200.00 466,328.56 20.3 OTHER GOVERNMENTS 101-33220 FEDERAL GRANT-EMRGNCY PREP .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-33390 FEDERAL GRANT-OTHER .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-33410 HACA AID .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-33415 MARKET VALUE CREDIT .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-33420 POLICE STATE AID .00 .00 240,000.00 240,000.00 .0 101-33430 POLICE TRAINING REIMBURSEMENT .00 .00 23,000.00 23,000.00 .0 101-33440 MUNICIPAL STATE AID-STREETS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-33450 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-33460 PERA STATE AID .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-33490 STATE GRANT-OTHER 23,248.44 23,248.44 140,000.00 116,751.56 16.6 101-33610 COUNTY GRANT-RECYCLING .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-33690 COUNTY GRANT-OTHER 8,435.00 8,435.00 .00 ( 8,435.00) .0 101-33800 OTHER GRANTS/AIDS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-33890 GRANTS/AIDS FROM OTHER GOVTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 TOTAL OTHER GOVERNMENTS 31,683.44 31,683.44 403,000.00 371,316.56 7.9 Exhibit B - Revenue Detail Page 2 of 27 CITY OF ORONO REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 3 MONTHS ENDING MARCH 31, 2022 GENERAL FUND PERIOD MARCH 31, 2022 BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 25 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/06/2022 07:58AM PAGE: 2 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 101-34200 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES FOR SVC .00 .00 275,000.00 275,000.00 .0 101-34210 GENERAL TAXABLE SALES/SERVICE 20.50 20.50 2,000.00 1,979.50 1.0 101-34220 ASSESSMENTS SEARCHES .00 .00 100.00 100.00 .0 101-34230 FILING FEES-ELECTIONS/PLATS .00 .00 3,000.00 3,000.00 .0 101-34240 ZONING DISCLOSURE 50.00 50.00 .00 ( 50.00) .0 101-34410 PLAN CHECK/SITE EXAM FEES 83,534.51 83,534.51 200,000.00 116,465.49 41.8 101-34420 COND USE-VARIANCE-DEV FEES 4,500.00 4,500.00 19,000.00 14,500.00 23.7 101-34430 ENGINEERING & LEGAL FEES ( 18,859.82) ( 18,859.82)45,000.00 63,859.82 ( 41.9) 101-34440 BLDG PERMITS-MAIL IN FEES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-34450 ON-SITE SEPTIC PROGRAM FEES 11,713.98 11,713.98 46,300.00 34,586.02 25.3 101-34460 COOP AGREEMENT-INSPECTION .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-34610 COOP AGREEMENT-POLICE 1,121,622.68 1,121,622.68 2,552,800.00 1,431,177.32 43.9 101-34620 COOP AGREEMENT-ANIMAL CONTROL .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-34630 POLICE SPECIAL SERVICES .00 .00 100,000.00 100,000.00 .0 101-34640 FALSE ALARM FEES .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .0 101-34650 POLICE REPORTS .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .0 101-34670 POLICE RESERVE RECEIPTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-34680 EXPLORERS PROGRAM 60.00 60.00 .00 ( 60.00) .0 101-34781 OFF LEASH ANNUAL PASS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-34783 PARK RESERVATIONS 3,285.00 3,285.00 2,000.00 ( 1,285.00) 164.3 101-34810 COOP AGREEMENT-PUBLIC WORKS 57,976.87 57,976.87 192,000.00 134,023.13 30.2 101-34815 INTERDEPARTMENTAL SERVICES-PW .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-34820 RECYCLING PROGRAM FEES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-34830 BRUSH SITE FEES .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .0 TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES 1,263,903.72 1,263,903.72 3,440,200.00 2,176,296.28 36.7 FINES 101-35104 OTHER FINES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-35105 ADMIN CITATIONS 2,361.67 2,361.67 15,000.00 12,638.33 15.7 101-35400 COURT FINES 13,311.00 13,311.00 60,000.00 46,689.00 22.2 101-35410 DRUG TASK FORCE .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-35420 DOG IMPOUND FEES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-35620 ADMINISTRATIVE 30% SHARE .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 TOTAL FINES 15,672.67 15,672.67 75,000.00 59,327.33 20.9 Exhibit B - Revenue Detail Page 3 of 27 CITY OF ORONO REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 3 MONTHS ENDING MARCH 31, 2022 GENERAL FUND PERIOD MARCH 31, 2022 BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 25 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/06/2022 07:58AM PAGE: 3 MISCELLANEOUS 101-37699 UTILITY PENALTIES 4.41 4.41 2,000.00 1,995.59 .2 101-37910 GREEN FEES 376.33 376.33 225,000.00 224,623.67 .2 101-37920 RENTAL-GOLF CARTS & CLUB .00 .00 90,000.00 90,000.00 .0 101-37930 BEER SALES ( 10.00) ( 10.00)15,000.00 15,010.00 ( .1) 101-37935 POP SALES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-37940 CONCESSIONS-TAXABLE ( 7.00) ( 7.00)5,000.00 5,007.00 ( .1) 101-37950 CONCESSIONS-NONTAXABLE .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-37960 GOLF BALL SALES .00 .00 2,000.00 2,000.00 .0 101-37970 PRO SHOP-TAXABLE .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .0 101-37980 PRO SHOP-NONTAXABLE .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-37985 GOLF COURSE PRINTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-37990 OTHER GOLF COURSE RECEIPTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-37999 CASH OVER/SHORT .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 363.74 363.74 340,000.00 339,636.26 .1 OTHER SOURCES & TRANSFERS IN 101-39310 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS .00 .00 80,000.00 80,000.00 .0 101-39315 INVESTMENT DISCOUNTS/PREMIUMS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-39350 INTEREST-NOW ACCOUNT 177.70 177.70 500.00 322.30 35.5 101-39610 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 2,386.69 2,386.69 4,700.00 2,313.31 50.8 101-39615 CONVENIENCE FEE .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-39620 RENT INCOME 900.00 900.00 5,400.00 4,500.00 16.7 101-39630 CONTRIBUTIONS & DONATIONS 1,290.00 1,290.00 5,000.00 3,710.00 25.8 101-39640 REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS ( 1,356.48) ( 1,356.48)3,000.00 4,356.48 ( 45.2) 101-39650 PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-39670 SALE OF LAND .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-39680 SALE OF EQUIPMENT .00 .00 20,000.00 20,000.00 .0 101-39920 RESIDUAL EQUITY TRANSFERS IN .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-39999 CASH OVER/SHORT .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 TOTAL OTHER SOURCES & TRANSFERS IN 3,397.91 3,397.91 118,600.00 115,202.09 2.9 TOTAL FUND REVENUE 1,433,892.92 1,433,892.92 9,975,596.00 8,541,703.08 14.4 NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES 1,433,892.92 1,433,892.92 9,975,596.00 8,541,703.08 14.4 Exhibit B - Revenue Detail Page 4 of 27 City of Orono Revenue Comparison 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% Q1 2018 Q1 2019 Q1 2020 Q1 2021 Q1 2022 Q2 2018 Q2 2019 Q2 2020 Q2 2021 Q2 2022 Q3 2018 Q3 2019 Q3 2020 Q3 2021 Q3 2022 YE 2018 E YE 2019 YE 2020 YE 2021 YE 2022 Co m p a r i s o n T o B u d g e t 2021 Revenue Comparisons Exhibit C - Revenue Graph Page 5 of 27 Department March 31 Budget Percent Dec 31 Percent March 31 Budget Balance Percent Taxes - 4,936,140 0.00%4,841,335 98.08%- 5,013,596 5,013,596 0.00% Licenses & Permits 135,692 532,200 25.50%611,442 114.89%118,871 585,200 466,329 20.31% Other Governmental 2,740 268,000 1.02%522,999 195.15%31,683 403,000 371,317 7.86% Charges for Service 1,337,612 3,160,460 42.32%3,466,343 109.68%1,263,891 3,440,200 2,176,309 36.74% Fines 25,677 70,100 36.63%85,831 122.44%15,673 75,000 59,327 20.90% Miscellaneous - 2,000 0.00%4 0.21%- 2,000 2,000 0.00% Golf Course 508 188,000 0.27%383,216 203.84%359 338,000 337,641 0.11% Interest 143 70,500 0.20%70,500 100.00%178 80,500 80,322 0.22% Other Sources & Transfers 23,758 33,100 71.78%3,409 10.30%3,220 38,100 34,880 8.45% 1,526,130 9,260,500 16.48%9,985,079 107.82%1,433,876 9,975,596 8,541,720 14.37% AnnualQuarter City of Orono Revenue Summary with Comparison to Budget For The 3 Months Ending March 31, 2021 - 22 2021 2022 Exhibit D Expenditure Summary Page 6 of 27 CITY OF ORONO EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2022 GENERAL FUND PERIOD YTD BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/06/2022 08:05AM PAGE: 1 MAYOR & COUNCIL 101-41110-101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES REGULAR 6,066.72 6,066.72 18,200.00 12,133.28 33.3 101-41110-122 FICA 464.08 464.08 1,400.00 935.92 33.2 101-41110-151 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE PREM .00 .00 100.00 100.00 .0 101-41110-301 AUDITING AND ACCT'G SERVICES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41110-313 IT SERVICES .00 .00 900.00 900.00 .0 101-41110-319 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES .00 .00 6,500.00 6,500.00 .0 101-41110-433 MEMBERSHIPS 12,627.00 12,627.00 13,000.00 373.00 97.1 101-41110-437 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT .00 .00 400.00 400.00 .0 101-41110-439 MEETING EXPENSES 723.80 723.80 3,000.00 2,276.20 24.1 101-41110-489 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 TOTAL MAYOR & COUNCIL 19,881.60 19,881.60 43,500.00 23,618.40 45.7 ADMINISTRATION 101-41300-101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES REGULAR 86,634.95 86,634.95 286,500.00 199,865.05 30.2 101-41300-102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES OVERTIME .00 .00 1,300.00 1,300.00 .0 101-41300-103 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 2,282.00 2,282.00 .00 ( 2,282.00) .0 101-41300-104 TEMPORARY/SEASONAL EMPLOYEES 2,282.00 2,282.00 14,000.00 11,718.00 16.3 101-41300-111 OTHER .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41300-121 PERA 6,497.66 6,497.66 21,600.00 15,102.34 30.1 101-41300-122 FICA 7,066.07 7,066.07 23,100.00 16,033.93 30.6 101-41300-135 CITY BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION 16,127.22 16,127.22 48,600.00 32,472.78 33.2 101-41300-142 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PAYMENTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41300-143 OPEB EXPENSE .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41300-151 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE PREM .00 .00 2,200.00 2,200.00 .0 101-41300-208 BOOKS & PERIODICALS .00 .00 300.00 300.00 .0 101-41300-313 IT SERVICES .00 .00 7,000.00 7,000.00 .0 101-41300-319 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,059.88 1,059.88 .00 ( 1,059.88) .0 101-41300-331 TRAVEL EXPENSES 66.41 66.41 1,000.00 933.59 6.6 101-41300-340 GENERAL ADVERTISING .00 .00 2,500.00 2,500.00 .0 101-41300-433 MEMBERSHIPS 495.00 495.00 1,600.00 1,105.00 30.9 101-41300-437 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 87.00 87.00 4,000.00 3,913.00 2.2 101-41300-439 MEETING EXPENSES .00 .00 1,500.00 1,500.00 .0 101-41300-489 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES .00 .00 3,000.00 3,000.00 .0 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION 122,598.19 122,598.19 418,200.00 295,601.81 29.3 Exhibit E - Expenditure Detail Page 7 of 27 CITY OF ORONO EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2022 GENERAL FUND PERIOD YTD BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/06/2022 08:05AM PAGE: 2 ELECTIONS 101-41410-101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES REGULAR 6,022.43 6,022.43 20,200.00 14,177.57 29.8 101-41410-102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES OVERTIME .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .0 101-41410-104 TEMPORARY/SEASONAL EMPLOYEES .00 .00 25,000.00 25,000.00 .0 101-41410-121 PERA 451.55 451.55 1,600.00 1,148.45 28.2 101-41410-122 FICA 467.43 467.43 1,600.00 1,132.57 29.2 101-41410-135 CITY BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION 1,966.60 1,966.60 5,900.00 3,933.40 33.3 101-41410-142 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PAYMENTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41410-151 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE PREM .00 .00 300.00 300.00 .0 101-41410-208 BOOKS & PERIODICALS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41410-221 EQUIPMENT PARTS & ACCESSORIES 4,078.18 4,078.18 4,000.00 ( 78.18) 102.0 101-41410-240 SMALL TOOLS AND MINOR EQUIP .00 .00 2,000.00 2,000.00 .0 101-41410-319 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES .00 .00 2,600.00 2,600.00 .0 101-41410-322 POSTAGE .00 .00 400.00 400.00 .0 101-41410-331 TRAVEL EXPENSES 10.21 10.21 350.00 339.79 2.9 101-41410-340 GENERAL ADVERTISING .00 .00 320.00 320.00 .0 101-41410-412 BUILDING RENTALS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41410-415 OTHER EQUIPMENT RENTALS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41410-437 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT .00 .00 100.00 100.00 .0 101-41410-439 MEETING EXPENSES .00 .00 2,000.00 2,000.00 .0 101-41410-489 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .0 TOTAL ELECTIONS 12,996.40 12,996.40 68,370.00 55,373.60 19.0 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 101-41500-101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES REGULAR 66,035.80 66,035.80 196,200.00 130,164.20 33.7 101-41500-102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES OVERTIME .00 .00 200.00 200.00 .0 101-41500-103 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41500-104 TEMPORARY/SEASONAL EMPLOYEES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41500-121 PERA 4,952.77 4,952.77 14,700.00 9,747.23 33.7 101-41500-122 FICA 4,437.58 4,437.58 15,000.00 10,562.42 29.6 101-41500-135 CITY BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION 15,238.33 15,238.33 42,300.00 27,061.67 36.0 101-41500-142 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PAYMENTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41500-143 OPEB EXPENSE .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41500-151 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE PREM .00 .00 1,500.00 1,500.00 .0 101-41500-208 BOOKS & PERIODICALS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41500-301 AUDITING AND ACCT'G SERVICES 6,900.00 6,900.00 .00 ( 6,900.00) .0 101-41500-313 IT SERVICES .00 .00 5,500.00 5,500.00 .0 101-41500-331 TRAVEL EXPENSES 110.20 110.20 250.00 139.80 44.1 101-41500-433 MEMBERSHIPS 140.00 140.00 500.00 360.00 28.0 101-41500-437 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 5,280.00 5,280.00 3,000.00 ( 2,280.00) 176.0 TOTAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT 103,094.68 103,094.68 279,150.00 176,055.32 36.9 Exhibit E - Expenditure Detail Page 8 of 27 CITY OF ORONO EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2022 GENERAL FUND PERIOD YTD BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/06/2022 08:05AM PAGE: 3 ASSESSING 101-41550-142 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PAYMENTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41550-302 ASSESSING SERVICES .00 .00 220,000.00 220,000.00 .0 TOTAL ASSESSING .00 .00 220,000.00 220,000.00 .0 LAW/LEGAL SERVICES 101-41600-305 LEGAL-RETAINER .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41600-306 LEGAL-PROSECUTION 8,942.13 8,942.13 41,000.00 32,057.87 21.8 101-41600-307 LEGAL-CONSULTING 10,466.63 10,466.63 80,000.00 69,533.37 13.1 101-41600-308 CODE ENFORCEMENT 34.00 34.00 4,000.00 3,966.00 .9 101-41600-309 JAIL CHARGES 665.67 665.67 8,000.00 7,334.33 8.3 TOTAL LAW/LEGAL SERVICES 20,108.43 20,108.43 133,000.00 112,891.57 15.1 HUMAN SERVICES 101-41800-490 CONTRIBUTIONS TO CIVIC ORG'S .00 .00 12,400.00 12,400.00 .0 TOTAL HUMAN SERVICES .00 .00 12,400.00 12,400.00 .0 Exhibit E - Expenditure Detail Page 9 of 27 CITY OF ORONO EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2022 GENERAL FUND PERIOD YTD BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/06/2022 08:05AM PAGE: 4 CENTRAL SERVICES 101-41900-103 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 5,473.63 5,473.63 18,300.00 12,826.37 29.9 101-41900-104 TEMPORARY/SEASONAL EMPLOYEES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41900-121 PERA .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41900-122 FICA 426.41 426.41 1,400.00 973.59 30.5 101-41900-135 CITY BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION .00 .00 1,200.00 1,200.00 .0 101-41900-151 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE PREM .00 .00 1,100.00 1,100.00 .0 101-41900-201 OFFICE SUPPLIES 2,143.24 2,143.24 12,000.00 9,856.76 17.9 101-41900-221 EQUIPMENT PARTS & ACCESSORIES 154.10 154.10 1,000.00 845.90 15.4 101-41900-223 BLDG/GROUNDS MAINT. SUPPLIES 1,194.92 1,194.92 3,500.00 2,305.08 34.1 101-41900-301 AUDITING AND ACCT'G SERVICES .00 .00 25,000.00 25,000.00 .0 101-41900-310 LOGIS-APPLICATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41900-311 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATION .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41900-312 BANK FEES 57.17 57.17 1,000.00 942.83 5.7 101-41900-313 IT SERVICES .00 .00 56,000.00 56,000.00 .0 101-41900-319 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 67,310.27 67,310.27 30,000.00 ( 37,310.27) 224.4 101-41900-321 TELEPHONE 5,855.30 5,855.30 14,000.00 8,144.70 41.8 101-41900-322 POSTAGE 1,424.67 1,424.67 6,500.00 5,075.33 21.9 101-41900-329 INTERNET/OTHER COMMUNICATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41900-352 PRINTING & PUBLISHING 6,106.94 6,106.94 22,000.00 15,893.06 27.8 101-41900-361 GENERAL LIABILITY INS .00 .00 11,300.00 11,300.00 .0 101-41900-362 UMBRELLA LIABILITY INS .00 .00 16,600.00 16,600.00 .0 101-41900-363 BONDS INSURANCE .00 .00 800.00 800.00 .0 101-41900-364 MONEYS & SECURITIES INS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41900-365 BOILER & MACHINERY INS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41900-366 PROPERTY INSURANCE .00 .00 15,500.00 15,500.00 .0 101-41900-367 EQUIPMENT FLOATERS INS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41900-368 AUTOMOTIVE INSURANCE .00 .00 5,000.00 5,000.00 .0 101-41900-370 INSURANCE AGENT OF RECORD .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41900-381 GAS & ELECTRIC 11,908.04 11,908.04 34,000.00 22,091.96 35.0 101-41900-382 WATER UTILITIES 982.94 982.94 4,000.00 3,017.06 24.6 101-41900-401 REPAIRS/MAINT-OFFICE EQUIP 2,940.79 2,940.79 500.00 ( 2,440.79) 588.2 101-41900-403 REPAIRS/MAINT-MISC. EQUIP .00 .00 3,000.00 3,000.00 .0 101-41900-404 REPAIRS/MAINT-BLDGS/GROUNDS 9,917.77 9,917.77 45,000.00 35,082.23 22.0 101-41900-407 JANITORIAL SERVICES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41900-413 OFFICE EQUIPMENT RENTAL .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41900-416 SOFTWARE LICENSING .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41900-440 SPECIAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41900-441 LICENSES & TAXES .00 .00 500.00 500.00 .0 101-41900-489 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES 500.00 500.00 500.00 .00 100.0 101-41900-512 SPEC ASSMTS ON LAND & INT .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-41900-750 INTEREST ON SPECIAL ASSMNTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 TOTAL CENTRAL SERVICES 116,396.19 116,396.19 329,700.00 213,303.81 35.3 Exhibit E - Expenditure Detail Page 10 of 27 CITY OF ORONO EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2022 GENERAL FUND PERIOD YTD BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/06/2022 08:05AM PAGE: 5 POLICE DEPARTMENT 101-42110-101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES REGULAR 874,035.26 874,035.26 2,880,000.00 2,005,964.74 30.4 101-42110-102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES OVERTIME 13,784.71 13,784.71 50,000.00 36,215.29 27.6 101-42110-103 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 15,996.43 15,996.43 80,800.00 64,803.57 19.8 101-42110-104 TEMPORARY/SEASONAL EMPLOYEES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42110-121 PERA 139,792.02 139,792.02 493,300.00 353,507.98 28.3 101-42110-122 FICA 16,228.04 16,228.04 59,000.00 42,771.96 27.5 101-42110-135 CITY BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION 142,101.32 142,101.32 405,000.00 262,898.68 35.1 101-42110-142 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PAYMENTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42110-143 OPEB EXPENSE .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42110-151 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE PREM .00 .00 208,000.00 208,000.00 .0 101-42110-201 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,011.98 1,011.98 10,000.00 8,988.02 10.1 101-42110-208 BOOKS & PERIODICALS .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .0 101-42110-212 MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS 27,561.36 27,561.36 100,000.00 72,438.64 27.6 101-42110-221 EQUIPMENT PARTS & ACCESSORIES 2,397.07 2,397.07 15,000.00 12,602.93 16.0 101-42110-223 BLDG/GROUNDS MAINT. SUPPLIES .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .0 101-42110-226 CLOTHING & PERSONAL EQUIPMENT 8,379.72 8,379.72 30,000.00 21,620.28 27.9 101-42110-228 TRAINING SUPPLIES 8,138.90 8,138.90 16,000.00 7,861.10 50.9 101-42110-229 EXPLORERS PROGRAM EXPENSES 460.43 460.43 2,500.00 2,039.57 18.4 101-42110-240 SMALL TOOLS AND MINOR EQUIP 1,683.33 1,683.33 6,000.00 4,316.67 28.1 101-42110-304 ENGINEERING-CONSULTING .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42110-307 LEGAL-CONSULTING 799.00 799.00 8,000.00 7,201.00 10.0 101-42110-310 LOGIS-APPLICATIONS 23,421.00 23,421.00 148,900.00 125,479.00 15.7 101-42110-311 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATION 4,861.09 4,861.09 10,000.00 5,138.91 48.6 101-42110-313 IT SERVICES .00 .00 95,000.00 95,000.00 .0 101-42110-317 ANIMAL CARE 1,515.06 1,515.06 1,500.00 ( 15.06) 101.0 101-42110-319 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14,616.40 14,616.40 23,400.00 8,783.60 62.5 101-42110-321 TELEPHONE 7,689.38 7,689.38 24,000.00 16,310.62 32.0 101-42110-322 POSTAGE 160.95 160.95 800.00 639.05 20.1 101-42110-329 INTERNET/OTHER COMMUNICATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42110-331 TRAVEL EXPENSES 125.40 125.40 300.00 174.60 41.8 101-42110-340 GENERAL ADVERTISING .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42110-352 PRINTING & PUBLISHING 271.00 271.00 1,500.00 1,229.00 18.1 101-42110-361 GENERAL LIABILITY INS .00 .00 65,000.00 65,000.00 .0 101-42110-362 UMBRELLA LIABILITY INS .00 .00 28,000.00 28,000.00 .0 101-42110-366 PROPERTY INSURANCE .00 .00 1,200.00 1,200.00 .0 101-42110-367 EQUIPMENT FLOATERS INS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42110-368 AUTOMOTIVE INSURANCE .00 .00 20,500.00 20,500.00 .0 101-42110-370 INSURANCE AGENT OF RECORD .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42110-379 INSURANCE DEDUCTIBLES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42110-381 GAS & ELECTRIC 12,052.37 12,052.37 20,000.00 7,947.63 60.3 101-42110-382 WATER UTILITIES 246.66 246.66 3,000.00 2,753.34 8.2 101-42110-401 REPAIRS/MAINT-OFFICE EQUIP .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .0 101-42110-402 REPAIRS/MAINT-AUTO EQUIP 8,476.16 8,476.16 40,000.00 31,523.84 21.2 101-42110-403 REPAIRS/MAINT-MISC. EQUIP 555.00 555.00 5,500.00 4,945.00 10.1 101-42110-404 REPAIRS/MAINT-BLDGS/GROUNDS 3,312.02 3,312.02 15,000.00 11,687.98 22.1 101-42110-407 JANITORIAL SERVICES .00 .00 15,000.00 15,000.00 .0 101-42110-413 OFFICE EQUIPMENT RENTAL .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42110-414 EDP/COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP RENT 8,677.92 8,677.92 28,000.00 19,322.08 31.0 101-42110-416 SOFTWARE LICENSING 767.94 767.94 .00 ( 767.94) .0 101-42110-433 MEMBERSHIPS 3,045.88 3,045.88 5,000.00 1,954.12 60.9 101-42110-436 TOWING CHARGES 727.81 727.81 .00 ( 727.81) .0 101-42110-437 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 12,661.90 12,661.90 38,000.00 25,338.10 33.3 Exhibit E - Expenditure Detail Page 11 of 27 CITY OF ORONO EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2022 GENERAL FUND PERIOD YTD BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/06/2022 08:05AM PAGE: 6 101-42110-438 DISTRIBUTION TO OTHER GOVMNTS 21,307.59 21,307.59 .00 ( 21,307.59) .0 101-42110-439 MEETING EXPENSES 872.62 872.62 2,000.00 1,127.38 43.6 101-42110-440 SPECIAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42110-441 LICENSES & TAXES 297.70 297.70 1,300.00 1,002.30 22.9 101-42110-489 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES 199.12 199.12 2,500.00 2,300.88 8.0 101-42110-520 BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42110-550 AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT 10,019.10 10,019.10 164,000.00 153,980.90 6.1 101-42110-560 FURNITURE AND FIXTURES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42110-570 OFFICE EQUIP AND FURNISHINGS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42110-575 IT HARDWARE & APPLICATIONS 9,125.00 9,125.00 .00 ( 9,125.00) .0 101-42110-580 OTHER EQUIPMENT 6,742.00 6,742.00 21,000.00 14,258.00 32.1 TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT 1,404,116.64 1,404,116.64 5,147,000.00 3,742,883.36 27.3 FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES 101-42260-201 OFFICE SUPPLIES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42260-221 EQUIPMENT PARTS & ACCESSORIES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42260-318 FIRE SERVICES 227,970.50 227,970.50 455,941.00 227,970.50 50.0 101-42260-319 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42260-381 GAS & ELECTRIC .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42260-489 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES 227,970.50 227,970.50 455,941.00 227,970.50 50.0 Exhibit E - Expenditure Detail Page 12 of 27 CITY OF ORONO EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2022 GENERAL FUND PERIOD YTD BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/06/2022 08:05AM PAGE: 7 BUILDING & ZONING 101-42400-101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES REGULAR 154,833.40 154,833.40 508,800.00 353,966.60 30.4 101-42400-102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES OVERTIME .00 .00 200.00 200.00 .0 101-42400-103 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42400-104 TEMPORARY/SEASONAL EMPLOYEES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42400-121 PERA 11,612.48 11,612.48 38,200.00 26,587.52 30.4 101-42400-122 FICA 11,727.38 11,727.38 39,000.00 27,272.62 30.1 101-42400-135 CITY BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION 33,162.66 33,162.66 109,275.00 76,112.34 30.4 101-42400-142 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PAYMENTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42400-143 OPEB EXPENSE .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42400-151 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE PREM .00 .00 3,300.00 3,300.00 .0 101-42400-208 BOOKS & PERIODICALS 572.93 572.93 .00 ( 572.93) .0 101-42400-212 MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42400-221 EQUIPMENT PARTS & ACCESSORIES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42400-226 CLOTHING & PERSONAL EQUIPMENT .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42400-240 SMALL TOOLS AND MINOR EQUIP .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42400-304 ENGINEERING-CONSULTING .00 .00 2,500.00 2,500.00 .0 101-42400-305 GIS/MAPPING .00 .00 3,000.00 3,000.00 .0 101-42400-307 LEGAL-CONSULTING 1,508.00 1,508.00 16,000.00 14,492.00 9.4 101-42400-310 INSPECTION SERVICES 11,267.50 11,267.50 25,000.00 13,732.50 45.1 101-42400-312 BANK FEES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42400-313 IT SERVICES .00 .00 26,000.00 26,000.00 .0 101-42400-319 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 620.88 620.88 5,000.00 4,379.12 12.4 101-42400-321 TELEPHONE 1,893.85 1,893.85 850.00 ( 1,043.85) 222.8 101-42400-331 TRAVEL EXPENSES .00 .00 1,500.00 1,500.00 .0 101-42400-340 GENERAL ADVERTISING 318.86 318.86 400.00 81.14 79.7 101-42400-402 REPAIRS/MAINT-AUTO EQUIP 416.73 416.73 .00 ( 416.73) .0 101-42400-403 REPAIRS/MAINT-MISC. EQUIP .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42400-415 OTHER EQUIPMENT RENTALS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42400-416 SOFTWARE LICENSING .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-42400-433 MEMBERSHIPS 65.00 65.00 800.00 735.00 8.1 101-42400-437 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 895.00 895.00 7,000.00 6,105.00 12.8 101-42400-439 MEETING EXPENSES .00 .00 100.00 100.00 .0 101-42400-441 LICENSES & TAXES 19.25 19.25 .00 ( 19.25) .0 TOTAL BUILDING & ZONING 228,913.92 228,913.92 786,925.00 558,011.08 29.1 Exhibit E - Expenditure Detail Page 13 of 27 CITY OF ORONO EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2022 GENERAL FUND PERIOD YTD BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/06/2022 08:05AM PAGE: 8 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 101-43000-101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES REGULAR 99,772.31 99,772.31 164,100.00 64,327.69 60.8 101-43000-102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES OVERTIME 6,850.85 6,850.85 11,000.00 4,149.15 62.3 101-43000-121 PERA 7,996.78 7,996.78 13,100.00 5,103.22 61.0 101-43000-122 FICA 7,640.97 7,640.97 13,400.00 5,759.03 57.0 101-43000-135 CITY BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION 22,843.38 22,843.38 34,300.00 11,456.62 66.6 101-43000-142 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PAYMENTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43000-143 OPEB EXPENSE .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43000-151 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE PREM .00 .00 12,700.00 12,700.00 .0 101-43000-208 BOOKS & PERIODICALS 218.30 218.30 .00 ( 218.30) .0 101-43000-212 MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS 424.54 424.54 .00 ( 424.54) .0 101-43000-221 EQUIPMENT PARTS & ACCESSORIES 3,926.26 3,926.26 .00 ( 3,926.26) .0 101-43000-222 VEHICLE EQUIPMENT & PARTS 145.08 145.08 .00 ( 145.08) .0 101-43000-224 STREET MAINT. MATERIALS/SUPPLY 29,220.48 29,220.48 84,000.00 54,779.52 34.8 101-43000-226 CLOTHING & PERSONAL EQUIPMENT 3,291.31 3,291.31 8,000.00 4,708.69 41.1 101-43000-240 SMALL TOOLS AND MINOR EQUIP 6,091.89 6,091.89 3,000.00 ( 3,091.89) 203.1 101-43000-304 PW ENGINEERING-CONSULTING .00 .00 800.00 800.00 .0 101-43000-305 GIS/MAPPING .00 .00 800.00 800.00 .0 101-43000-313 IT SERVICES .00 .00 4,000.00 4,000.00 .0 101-43000-314 FLEET SERVICES .00 .00 100,000.00 100,000.00 .0 101-43000-319 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 531.17 531.17 .00 ( 531.17) .0 101-43000-321 TELEPHONE 920.26 920.26 1,000.00 79.74 92.0 101-43000-331 TRAVEL EXPENSES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43000-340 GENERAL ADVERTISING 504.00 504.00 .00 ( 504.00) .0 101-43000-381 GAS & ELECTRIC 1,236.50 1,236.50 2,900.00 1,663.50 42.6 101-43000-386 STREET LIGHTING 8,406.27 8,406.27 29,000.00 20,593.73 29.0 101-43000-402 REPAIRS/MAINT-AUTO EQUIP .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43000-403 REPAIRS/MAINT-MISC. EQUIP .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43000-404 REPAIRS/MAINT-BLDGS/GROUNDS 6,333.05 6,333.05 10,000.00 3,666.95 63.3 101-43000-408 CONTRACTED STREET MAINT..00 .00 80,000.00 80,000.00 .0 101-43000-409 OFFICE EQUIPMENT RENTAL .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43000-414 EDP/COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP RENT .00 .00 2,400.00 2,400.00 .0 101-43000-415 OTHER EQUIPMENT RENTALS 377.85 377.85 4,000.00 3,622.15 9.5 101-43000-416 SOFTWARE LICENSING .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43000-433 MEMBERSHIPS 179.00 179.00 300.00 121.00 59.7 101-43000-437 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 680.00 680.00 3,000.00 2,320.00 22.7 101-43000-441 LICENSES & TAXES .00 .00 300.00 300.00 .0 101-43000-489 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES 1,809.46 1,809.46 500.00 ( 1,309.46) 361.9 101-43000-590 STREET CONSTRUCTION .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 209,399.71 209,399.71 582,600.00 373,200.29 35.9 Exhibit E - Expenditure Detail Page 14 of 27 CITY OF ORONO EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2022 GENERAL FUND PERIOD YTD BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/06/2022 08:05AM PAGE: 9 PUBLIC WORKS - SPRING PARK 101-43050-101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES REGULAR .00 .00 62,800.00 62,800.00 .0 101-43050-102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES OVERTIME .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43050-121 PERA .00 .00 4,700.00 4,700.00 .0 101-43050-122 FICA .00 .00 4,800.00 4,800.00 .0 101-43050-135 CITY BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION .00 .00 13,200.00 13,200.00 .0 101-43050-151 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE PREM .00 .00 5,900.00 5,900.00 .0 101-43050-224 STREET MAINT. MATERIALS/SUPPLY 885.35 885.35 .00 ( 885.35) .0 101-43050-313 IT SERVICES .00 .00 500.00 500.00 .0 101-43050-314 FLEET SERVICES .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .0 101-43050-319 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,817.76 1,817.76 .00 ( 1,817.76) .0 101-43050-489 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES 436.34 436.34 .00 ( 436.34) .0 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS - SPRING PARK 3,139.45 3,139.45 92,900.00 89,760.55 3.4 BRUSH SITE 101-43100-104 TEMPORARY/SEASONAL EMPLOYEES 203.00 203.00 10,800.00 10,597.00 1.9 101-43100-122 FICA 15.53 15.53 800.00 784.47 1.9 101-43100-151 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE PREM .00 .00 600.00 600.00 .0 101-43100-223 BLDG/GROUNDS MAINT. SUPPLIES .00 .00 250.00 250.00 .0 101-43100-312 BANK FEES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43100-313 IT SERVICES .00 .00 250.00 250.00 .0 101-43100-321 TELEPHONE 280.08 280.08 .00 ( 280.08) .0 101-43100-352 PRINTING & PUBLISHING .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43100-361 GENERAL LIABILITY INS .00 .00 100.00 100.00 .0 101-43100-381 GAS & ELECTRIC 90.38 90.38 300.00 209.62 30.1 101-43100-404 REPAIRS/MAINT-BLDGS/GROUNDS 193.16 193.16 15,000.00 14,806.84 1.3 101-43100-415 OTHER EQUIPMENT RENTALS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 TOTAL BRUSH SITE 782.15 782.15 28,100.00 27,317.85 2.8 ENGINEERING 101-43170-303 ENGINEERING-RETAINER 3,486.00 3,486.00 .00 ( 3,486.00) .0 101-43170-304 ENGINEERING-CONSULTING 213.00 213.00 5,000.00 4,787.00 4.3 101-43170-305 GIS/MAPPING 2,685.00 2,685.00 15,000.00 12,315.00 17.9 TOTAL ENGINEERING 6,384.00 6,384.00 20,000.00 13,616.00 31.9 Exhibit E - Expenditure Detail Page 15 of 27 CITY OF ORONO EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2022 GENERAL FUND PERIOD YTD BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/06/2022 08:05AM PAGE: 10 RECYCLING PICK-UP PROGRAM 101-43270-101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES REGULAR .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43270-102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES OVERTIME .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43270-103 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43270-104 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES REGULAR .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43270-121 PERA .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43270-122 FICA .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43270-135 CITY BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43270-151 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE PREM .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43270-221 EQUIPMENT PARTS & ACCESSORIES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43270-316 CONTRACT RECYCLING PICKUP .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43270-319 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43270-352 PRINTING & PUBLISHING .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43270-442 SPRING,FALL,X-MAS CLEANUP .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43270-444 ORGANICS RECYCLING 133.23 133.23 .00 ( 133.23) .0 TOTAL RECYCLING PICK-UP PROGRAM 133.23 133.23 .00 ( 133.23) .0 SPECIAL SERVICES 101-43280-102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES OVERTIME 3,258.70 3,258.70 35,000.00 31,741.30 9.3 101-43280-121 PERA .00 .00 2,600.00 2,600.00 .0 101-43280-122 FICA .00 .00 2,700.00 2,700.00 .0 101-43280-135 CITY BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43280-151 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE PREM .00 .00 900.00 900.00 .0 101-43280-228 TRAINING SUPPLIES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43280-304 ENGINEERING-CONSULTING 5,212.00 5,212.00 70,000.00 64,788.00 7.5 101-43280-307 LEGAL-CONSULTING 5,998.29 5,998.29 18,000.00 12,001.71 33.3 101-43280-319 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43280-437 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43280-438 DISTRIBUTION TO OTHER GOVMNTS .00 .00 120,000.00 120,000.00 .0 101-43280-800 SPECIAL PROJECTS, CONTINGENCY .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 TOTAL SPECIAL SERVICES 14,468.99 14,468.99 249,200.00 234,731.01 5.8 SPECIAL PROJECTS-CONTINGENCIES 101-43290-101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES REGULAR .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43290-304 ENGINEERING-CONSULTING .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43290-319 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43290-489 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-43290-510 LAND 4,250.00 4,250.00 .00 ( 4,250.00) .0 101-43290-720 OPERATING TRANSFERS .00 .00 400,000.00 400,000.00 .0 101-43290-800 SPECIAL PROJECTS, CONTINGENCY .00 .00 30,000.00 30,000.00 .0 TOTAL SPECIAL PROJECTS-CONTINGENCIES 4,250.00 4,250.00 430,000.00 425,750.00 1.0 Exhibit E - Expenditure Detail Page 16 of 27 CITY OF ORONO EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2022 GENERAL FUND PERIOD YTD BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/06/2022 08:05AM PAGE: 11 PARKS 101-45200-101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES REGULAR 22,260.19 22,260.19 122,600.00 100,339.81 18.2 101-45200-102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES OVERTIME 917.75 917.75 .00 ( 917.75) .0 101-45200-103 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 5,113.31 5,113.31 18,300.00 13,186.69 27.9 101-45200-104 TEMPORARY/SEASONAL EMPLOYEES .00 .00 16,700.00 16,700.00 .0 101-45200-121 PERA 1,738.34 1,738.34 9,200.00 7,461.66 18.9 101-45200-122 FICA 2,232.48 2,232.48 12,100.00 9,867.52 18.5 101-45200-135 CITY BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION 4,985.83 4,985.83 18,100.00 13,114.17 27.6 101-45200-151 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE PREM .00 .00 13,000.00 13,000.00 .0 101-45200-212 MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS 31.47 31.47 .00 ( 31.47) .0 101-45200-221 EQUIPMENT PARTS & ACCESSORIES 69.57 69.57 .00 ( 69.57) .0 101-45200-223 BLDG/GROUNDS MAINT. SUPPLIES 1,128.25 1,128.25 16,000.00 14,871.75 7.1 101-45200-225 PARK COMMISSION .00 .00 10,000.00 10,000.00 .0 101-45200-226 CLOTHING & PERSONAL EQUIPMENT 244.99 244.99 .00 ( 244.99) .0 101-45200-240 SMALL TOOLS AND MINOR EQUIP .00 .00 2,000.00 2,000.00 .0 101-45200-304 ENGINEERING-CONSULTING 302.50 302.50 1,000.00 697.50 30.3 101-45200-305 GIS/MAPPING .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45200-313 IT SERVICES .00 .00 1,100.00 1,100.00 .0 101-45200-314 FLEET SERVICES .00 .00 6,600.00 6,600.00 .0 101-45200-319 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11,539.20 11,539.20 1,600.00 ( 9,939.20) 721.2 101-45200-321 TELEPHONE 320.12 320.12 400.00 79.88 80.0 101-45200-331 TRAVEL EXPENSES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45200-352 PRINTING & PUBLISHING .00 .00 450.00 450.00 .0 101-45200-381 GAS & ELECTRIC (252.72) ( 252.72)600.00 852.72 ( 42.1) 101-45200-386 LIGHTING .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45200-402 REPAIRS/MAINT-AUTO EQUIP .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45200-403 REPAIRS/MAINT-MISC. EQUIP .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45200-404 REPAIRS/MAINT-BLDGS/GROUNDS 2,649.81 2,649.81 83,000.00 80,350.19 3.2 101-45200-415 OTHER EQUIPMENT RENTALS 901.95 901.95 9,000.00 8,098.05 10.0 101-45200-416 SOFTWARE LICENSING .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45200-439 MEETING EXPENSES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45200-441 LICENSES & TAXES 175.22 175.22 500.00 324.78 35.0 101-45200-489 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES 140.60 140.60 100.00 ( 40.60) 140.6 101-45200-490 CONTRIBUTIONS TO CIVIC ORG'S .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 TOTAL PARKS 54,498.86 54,498.86 342,350.00 287,851.14 15.9 Exhibit E - Expenditure Detail Page 17 of 27 CITY OF ORONO EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2022 GENERAL FUND PERIOD YTD BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/06/2022 08:05AM PAGE: 12 GOLF COURSE 101-45210-090 PURCHASES FOR RESALE .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45210-091 BEER FOR RESALE 1,063.15 1,063.15 6,000.00 4,936.85 17.7 101-45210-092 SOFT DRINKS FOR RESALE 88.44 88.44 3,600.00 3,511.56 2.5 101-45210-093 CONCESSIONS FOR RESALE-TXBL 414.78 414.78 1,500.00 1,085.22 27.7 101-45210-094 CONCESSIONS FOR RESALE-NONTAX .00 .00 2,300.00 2,300.00 .0 101-45210-095 PRO SHOP ITEMS FOR RESALE 2,082.36 2,082.36 2,500.00 417.64 83.3 101-45210-099 OTHER FOR RESALE .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45210-101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES REGULAR 24,927.20 24,927.20 41,800.00 16,872.80 59.6 101-45210-102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES OVERTIME .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45210-103 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 5,339.10 5,339.10 68,900.00 63,560.90 7.8 101-45210-104 TEMPORARY/SEASONAL EMPLOYEES 853.89 853.89 52,900.00 52,046.11 1.6 101-45210-121 PERA 2,326.67 2,326.67 8,300.00 5,973.33 28.0 101-45210-122 FICA 2,398.13 2,398.13 12,500.00 10,101.87 19.2 101-45210-135 CITY BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION 723.22 723.22 9,800.00 9,076.78 7.4 101-45210-142 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PAYMENTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45210-143 OPEB EXPENSE .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45210-151 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE PREM .00 .00 9,000.00 9,000.00 .0 101-45210-201 OFFICE SUPPLIES .00 .00 500.00 500.00 .0 101-45210-212 MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS 3,889.43 3,889.43 .00 ( 3,889.43) .0 101-45210-221 EQUIPMENT PARTS & ACCESSORIES 1,519.27 1,519.27 .00 ( 1,519.27) .0 101-45210-223 BLDG/GROUNDS MAINT. SUPPLIES 102.25 102.25 8,000.00 7,897.75 1.3 101-45210-226 CLOTHING & PERSONAL EQUIPMENT .00 .00 500.00 500.00 .0 101-45210-240 SMALL TOOLS AND MINOR EQUIP 11.44 11.44 5,000.00 4,988.56 .2 101-45210-301 AUDITING AND ACCT'G SERVICES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45210-304 ENGINEERING-CONSULTING .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45210-307 LEGAL-CONSULTING .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45210-312 BANK FEES 366.97 366.97 15,000.00 14,633.03 2.5 101-45210-313 IT SERVICES .00 .00 2,500.00 2,500.00 .0 101-45210-314 FLEET SERVICES .00 .00 15,000.00 15,000.00 .0 101-45210-319 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 13,247.90 13,247.90 .00 ( 13,247.90) .0 101-45210-321 TELEPHONE 1,307.81 1,307.81 4,000.00 2,692.19 32.7 101-45210-322 POSTAGE .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45210-331 TRAVEL EXPENSES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45210-340 GENERAL ADVERTISING 312.00 312.00 1,800.00 1,488.00 17.3 101-45210-343 OTHER ADVERTISING .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45210-352 PRINTING & PUBLISHING .00 .00 1,700.00 1,700.00 .0 101-45210-361 GENERAL LIABILITY INS .00 .00 8,150.00 8,150.00 .0 101-45210-362 UMBRELLA LIABILITY INS .00 .00 1,650.00 1,650.00 .0 101-45210-365 BOILER & MACHINERY INS .00 .00 440.00 440.00 .0 101-45210-366 PROPERTY INSURANCE .00 .00 3,000.00 3,000.00 .0 101-45210-367 EQUIPMENT FLOATERS INS .00 .00 330.00 330.00 .0 101-45210-368 AUTOMOTIVE INSURANCE .00 .00 440.00 440.00 .0 101-45210-369 DRAM SHOP INSURANCE .00 .00 650.00 650.00 .0 101-45210-370 INSURANCE AGENT OF RECORD .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45210-379 INSURANCE DEDUCTIBLES .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45210-381 GAS & ELECTRIC 2,167.90 2,167.90 9,000.00 6,832.10 24.1 101-45210-382 WATER UTILITIES 72.58 72.58 300.00 227.42 24.2 101-45210-401 REPAIRS/MAINT-OFFICE EQUIP .00 .00 100.00 100.00 .0 101-45210-402 REPAIRS/MAINT-AUTO EQUIP 2,833.59 2,833.59 .00 ( 2,833.59) .0 101-45210-403 REPAIRS/MAINT-MISC. EQUIP .00 .00 6,000.00 6,000.00 .0 101-45210-404 REPAIRS/MAINT-BLDGS/GROUNDS 59.56 59.56 18,000.00 17,940.44 .3 101-45210-409 DEPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 Exhibit E - Expenditure Detail Page 18 of 27 CITY OF ORONO EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2022 GENERAL FUND PERIOD YTD BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/06/2022 08:05AM PAGE: 13 101-45210-415 OTHER EQUIPMENT RENTALS 1,874.97 1,874.97 14,500.00 12,625.03 12.9 101-45210-433 MEMBERSHIPS .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45210-437 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 308.00 308.00 .00 ( 308.00) .0 101-45210-438 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGE .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45210-440 SPECIAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 101-45210-441 LICENSES & TAXES 299.00 299.00 400.00 101.00 74.8 101-45210-489 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES .00 .00 200.00 200.00 .0 TOTAL GOLF COURSE 68,589.61 68,589.61 336,260.00 267,670.39 20.4 TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 2,617,722.55 2,617,722.55 9,975,596.00 7,357,873.45 26.2 NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES (2,617,722.55) ( 2,617,722.55) ( 9,975,596.00) ( 7,357,873.45) ( 26.2) Exhibit E - Expenditure Detail Page 19 of 27 Check Check Invoice Comment BOND TRUST SERVICES CORP Total 864,262.51 Debt Service PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASN Total 242,331.66 Retirement METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERV Total 206,879.95 Wastewater Charges VISU SEWER CLEAN & SEAL INC Total 198,200.95 Sewer Project INNOVO BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION Total 140,996.46 Health Insurance MN PEIP C/O MMB FISCAL SERVICE Total 122,768.88 Health Insurance CITY OF LONG LAKE Total 120,592.53 Fire- Utility LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Total 120,409.00 Liability Ins Oertel Architects, Ltd Total 106,370.08 New PW Building THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT Total 84,500.56 Dakota Rail Conenection BOLTON & MENK INC. Total 72,415.50 engineering Services WASTE MANAGEMENT RECYCLE Total 64,184.64 Curb Side Pickup ONYX PERFORMANCE INVESTMENTS LLC Total 57,214.00 Security Refund LOGIS Total 48,781.89 Internet, Network Sup, Police Orono Woods Apartments LLC Total 38,464.38 TIF Funds OMANN CONTRACTING COMPANIES INC Total 37,337.46 2020 Street Imp MNSPECT LLC Total 37,026.25 Inspection Services Blackstone Contractors LLC Total 36,478.80 GC Pond Dredging XCEL ENERGY Total 36,396.94 Electricity IRWIN L JACOBS 2018 IRREV TRUST Total 36,242.00 Eng/Legal Fee Refund MN STATE RETIREMENT-HCSP-ING Total 36,056.42 Emp Ben/Deductions CARGILL SALT Total 33,541.37 Salt - Road & Water Plant MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS Total 32,106.20 SAC Fees American Environmental LLC Total 31,475.90 Sewer Televising OPTUM Total 31,180.98 Emp Ben/Deductions MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY Total 30,868.84 Fuels FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2516 Total 25,877.41 Water Meters MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT Total 25,759.44 Vactor Repairs CITY OF WAYZATA Total 23,694.80 Utilities CAMPBELL KNUTSON Total 22,114.99 Legal Services CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN Total 21,853.69 Gas Service COMPASS MINERALS AMERICA Total 21,461.51 Road Salt Carmen Bay Lake Improvement District Total 16,537.49 Lake Imp District Payment CIVIC SYSTEMS LLC Total 13,264.00 Accounting Software STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP Total 12,262.45 Police Equip-Uniforms LAKE MTKA CONSERVATION DIST Total 12,018.25 LMCD Levy TALLEN AND BAERTSCHI Total 11,854.13 Prosecution Services ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 Total 11,021.00 Emp Ben/Deductions GUARDIAN FLEET SAFETY Total 10,688.88 Squad Video VERIZON WIRELESS Total 10,383.87 Cell Phones, Hot Spots Perry's Truck Repair Total 9,729.11 Equipment Repair (Plows) SERVPRO #10278 Total 9,467.65 Water Leak Clean up SHAUGHNESSY LAWN CARE Total 8,991.00 Park Mowing ORONO BASEBALL ASSOCIATION Total 8,435.16 State Grant WATCHGUARD VIDEO Total 8,071.88 Body Cams CARDMEMBER SERVICE Total 7,971.91 Credit Card Purchases Exhibit F - Vendor Listing Page 20 of 27 THE HARTFORD Total 7,440.44 Emp Ben/Deductions SUN LIFE FINANCIAL Total 7,279.66 Emp Ben/Deductions STATE OF MN DEFERRED COMP PLAN Total 7,020.00 Emp Ben/Deductions ABDO EICK & MEYERS LLP Total 6,900.00 Audit SHI Total 6,884.66 Software Licensing NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT Total 6,829.73 Emp Ben/Deductions SOJOURNER Total 6,700.00 Police Services Contract DELTA DENTAL Total 6,493.80 Emp Ben/Deductions VALLEY RICH CO Total 6,387.11 Watermain Repair OPG-3 INC Total 6,348.00 Laserfiche Licensing MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION Total 6,038.57 Code Updates HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TECH DPT Total 5,879.89 HC IT Services CADY BUILDING MAINTENANCE INC Total 5,863.75 Floor & Window Clean Newegg Business Inc Total 5,304.20 IT Equipment LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SRV Total 4,944.38 Union Dues VARNER MOBILE SERVICES LLC Total 4,574.16 PW Vehicle Repairs CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH Total 4,250.00 HC Land Purchase GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NAPA Total 3,840.62 Vehicle Parts, Tools AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE Total 3,835.38 Supplies UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Total 3,801.11 Postage WEST HENNEPIN PUBLIC SAFETY Total 3,600.00 Swat Training METRO CITIES Total 3,459.00 Membership KLEIN UNDERGROUND LLC Total 3,423.00 SP Water Repair PSN: PAYMENT SERVICE INVOICE Total 3,319.02 CC Charges CenturyLink Total 3,298.79 Phone Service CITYVIEW PLUMBING & HEATING INC. Total 3,232.09 S Water Plant BOYER TRUCKS INC Total 3,224.56 Veh Parts Bratt Tree Company Total 3,200.00 Tree Trimming HENNEPIN COUNTY ELECTIONS Total 3,152.97 Election Machines LeadsOnline Total 3,112.00 Investigations ALLSTREAM Total 3,090.34 Phone Service HOLTON ELECTRIC CONTRACTORS Total 2,945.94 Electrical updates EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES INC Total 2,800.00 Financial Reporting MN RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION Total 2,777.80 Water Training MN DEPT OF HEALTH Total 2,777.49 St Water Fees RANDYS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Total 2,733.85 Garbage Servie DENALI CUSTOM HOMES Total 2,615.86 BP/SAC Refund SECURITY & SOUND CO Total 2,574.00 CC AV Maint ADVANCED FIRST AID INC Total 2,514.93 Medical Supplies MTI DISTRIBUTING INC Total 2,482.31 GC Euip Parts GOPHER ACE Total 2,479.60 Misc Hardware ANNA CARLSON Total 2,400.00 Tuition Reimb WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE Total 2,334.48 Tires CERTIFIED CRIME FIGHTER Total 2,232.00 Subscription Aspen Mills Total 2,228.42 Uniforms/Mat Service MISSION COMMUNICATIONS LLC Total 2,193.60 SCADA WINTER EQUIPMENT COMPANY Total 2,172.15 Cutting Edges Exhibit F - Vendor Listing Page 21 of 27 MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE Total 2,037.00 Sales Tax MN DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Total 2,022.23 Water Permit FURTHER Total 1,964.82 Employee Benefits YAMAHA MOTOR CORP. Total 1,942.00 Golf Carts HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Total 1,918.34 Misc Hardware NAGELL APPRAISAL & CONSULTING Total 1,900.00 Appraisal City of Orono Utilities Total 1,870.96 utilites OPEIU - LOCAL 12 Total 1,854.50 Union Dues A 1 ELECTRIC SERVICE OF WACONIA Total 1,821.69 Electrical updates US Bank Equipment Finance Total 1,790.28 Copiers UNIFIRST CORPORATION Total 1,745.31 Uniforms/Mat Service CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO Total 1,736.07 Squad maint BARTON SAND & GRAVEL CO Total 1,729.00 Winter Patch BLUEBEAM INC Total 1,714.00 Inspections Software Safety Vehicle Solutions Total 1,713.00 Vehicle Warning Lights NYGARD, JAY & KENDALL Total 1,633.00 Dup Payment Refund OFFICE DEPOT Total 1,626.79 Office Supplies QUADIENT INC Total 1,612.68 Postage CENTERPOINT ENERGY Total 1,607.00 Gas Line for Generator DOG WASTE DEPOT Total 1,448.04 Lurton Park Supplies H & L MESABI Total 1,445.43 Cutting Edges TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial Inc Total 1,425.26 Minutes TOM MITTELSTAEDT PAINTING INC Total 1,400.00 Painting WATER CONSERVATION SVC INC Total 1,339.97 Main Break ASPEN EQUIPMENT Total 1,332.76 Plow parts FASTENAL Total 1,306.59 Supplies LUBE TECH ESI Total 1,286.50 Lubricants DESIGNPD LLC DBA AGENCY360 Total 1,197.00 Police Services Contract KEEFE COMPANY LLC Total 1,115.00 Door maint Century Link Total 1,080.92 Phone Service HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF Total 1,060.02 Jail Charges ECM PUBLISHERS INC Total 1,054.51 Advertising, Notices BROWN, JAY Total 1,025.00 Escrow Refund AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING INC Total 1,022.75 Road Project Borings International Union Local #49 Total 1,015.00 Union Dues THN ENTERPRISES Total 1,000.00 Transport Mower to BI BREKKEN, JENNIFER Total 1,000.00 Escrow Refund DOUGHERTY, MICHAEL Total 1,000.00 Escrow Refund KREPS, JEREMY Total 1,000.00 Escrow Refund MINNESOTA GREEN Total 1,000.00 Escrow Refund NIELAND, DOUGLAS Total 1,000.00 Escrow Refund STONE COTTAGE CONSTRUCTION Total 1,000.00 Escrow Refund OAK RIDGE PET BOARDING Total 1,000.00 Escrow Refund NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS. Total 960.00 T.C WINTER SERVICES Total 926.00 Wright-Hennepin Coop Electric Total 884.40 VESSCO INC Total 855.10 Exhibit F - Vendor Listing Page 22 of 27 JUMPPANEN, BARBARA Total 850.00 RDO EQUIPMENT Total 837.25 HERITAGE GLASS COMPANY Total 835.87 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION Total 821.25 HAWKINS INC Total 813.95 GRAFIX SHOPPE Total 790.00 THOMAS REUTERS - WEST Total 787.95 RITEWAY BUSINESS FORMS Total 669.27 GARY FISCHIER & ASSOC (GFA) Total 650.00 FAUL PSYCHOLOGICAL Total 650.00 LEOWEBPROTECT.com Total 646.88 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Total 611.95 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Total 602.22 JIVASOFT CORPORATION Total 600.00 FIELD TRAINING SOLUTIONS Total 590.00 TACTICAL SOLUTIONS Total 555.00 HOTSYMINNESOTA.COM Total 546.68 CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORPORATION Total 534.00 CHAMPLIN, JUDSON Total 526.68 PAYCHEX Total 525.00 City of Wayzata\DMV Total 521.50 BUREAU OF CRIM. APPREHENSION Total 510.00 ESS BROTHERS & SONS Total 501.00 FSSolutions Total 500.00 230 CIRCLE K STORES INC Total 500.00 SECOND NATURE GRAPHICS Total 488.50 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY Total 470.00 WILDTHREADS Total 466.92 WILLIAMS TOWING Total 465.00 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT Total 462.98 BIFFS INC Total 460.00 Occupational Health Centers of MN Total 427.00 TWIN STAR EQUIPMENT & MFG. CO. Total 425.00 JEFF'S BOBBY & STEVE'S AUTOWORLD Total 417.81 MOUND TRUE VALUE Total 406.94 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION Total 400.00 HOLIDAY COMPANIES Total 396.00 Hennepin County Public Works General Total 381.11 Hennepin County Accounts Receivable Total 381.11 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS - COPIERS Total 380.28 KYLE KIRSCHNER Total 362.61 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON Total 359.50 TITAN MACHINERY Total 350.00 KLINGSPOR Total 334.59 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Total 325.00 DITTER INC. Total 323.46 BLUE & BROWN BACKGROUNDS LLC Total 300.00 Exhibit F - Vendor Listing Page 23 of 27 NAVARRE HARDWARE Total 298.26 Hoss Plumbing LLC Total 289.00 WACONIA FORD SALES INC Total 269.04 CECE S SIGNS Total 260.00 Assn of Training Officers of MN Total 250.00 MINNETONKA SPORTSMEN INC Total 250.00 Ben Netzley Total 250.00 CITY OF MONTICELLO Total 250.00 THONVOLD, JACK Total 244.99 OLSEN CHAIN AND CABLE INC Total 244.16 PLUNKETT S Total 232.54 SIRCHIE FINGER PRINT LABS Total 232.24 AWWA Total 227.00 A LA CARTE CREATIVE GROUP Total 225.00 G&H Distributing & Supply Inc Total 224.48 IN CONTROL INC. Total 223.50 ESTATE OF CAROL LAQUEY Total 222.25 STAR TRIBUNE Total 218.30 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS Total 201.25 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH Golf Total 200.00 O SULLIVANS HOLIDAY 547 Total 195.72 MCROCK REAL ESTATE GROUP INC Total 166.73 CITY OF MINNETONKA BEACH Total 164.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Total 161.00 ON-SITE MEDICAL SERVICES INC Total 160.00 Reed Wholesale & OCS Total 155.90 WOODHEAD, KELLY Total 150.00 BARRY RATHBUN Total 149.99 DANIELS, JILL Total 145.96 ALERUS RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS Total 143.00 Navarre Minnoco Total 136.34 GONZALEZ, ALEJANDRO Total 131.54 UNIFIRST CO Total 125.81 HATCHER, STEVE Total 125.69 EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOC Total 120.30 Minnesota Secretary of State - Notary Total 120.00 MN SECRETARY OF STATE NOTARY Total 120.00 On Time Delivery Service Inc. Total 114.85 BELLINI, CHRISTOPHER Total 108.74 PLEAA Total 105.00 JONES, JULIE Total 100.00 MIELKE, JUSTIN Total 100.00 Riverside Design Total 99.89 Advance Auto Parts Total 99.74 BRANDON MAURER Total 90.72 LUNDELL, JAMES Total 90.32 SCHECHTER, DOKKEN Total 90.32 Exhibit F - Vendor Listing Page 24 of 27 MIELKE, RICHARD Total 87.00 KRIENKE, CARRIE Total 78.40 BALAN, TODD Total 73.89 David Goman Total 70.09 ACTIVE911 INC Total 70.00 VIRIDIAN WEAPON TECHNOLOGIES Total 69.00 Batteries + Bulbs Total 66.58 EXPRESS EMPLOYMENT PROFESSIONALS INC. Total 62.00 MCGREGOR, KELLY Total 56.83 HUELER, GREG & KELLY Total 52.68 WIEBUSCH, TREY Total 51.58 Morrie's Auto Body & Glass Total 50.00 TROPHIES BY LINDA Total 46.00 FIEGER, JANET Total 45.00 LANO EQUIPMENT Total 36.96 GRAINGER INC Total 34.78 DODGE OF BURNSVILLE Total 33.96 O SULLIVANS HOLIDAY 546 Total 33.00 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Total 23.00 CLINT SCHUMANN Total 23.00 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY ALCOHOL & GAMBL Total 20.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES Total 20.00 ACHEY, PETER Total 19.29 Awards by Cindy LLC Total 16.92 MIKE WOCKEN Total 12.00 OVERGARD, ERIC Total 10.00 S SQUARED CAPITAL LLC Total 9.53 CEMSTONE Total 8.75 CAMPBELL, COURTNEY Total 5.00 BARRETT, NANCY Total 1.95 Payee Total - Grand Total 3,451,182.37 Exhibit F - Vendor Listing Page 25 of 27 First Bank of Greenwich Conn 31926GBE9 CD RBC 3/29/2021 9/30/2024 0.40%$245,000.00 $245,000.00 $242,084.50 ($2,915.50)$193.31 Progrowth Bank CD CLL 74339JAK1 CD RBC 3/10/2021 3/11/2024 0.25%$245,000.00 $245,000.00 $242,603.90 ($2,396.10)$35.24 Preferred Bk Los Angeles CA 740367ND5 CD RBC 3/25/2021 3/25/2024 0.20%$245,000.00 $245,000.00 $242,238.85 ($2,761.15)$8.06 BMW Bk North Amer Salt Lake Cty 05580AZD9 CD RBC 3/26/2021 3/26/2024 0.45%$245,000.00 $245,000.00 $243,596.15 ($1,403.85)$289.97 Enerbank USA, SLC 29278TMK3 CD RBC 10/31/2019 10/31/2024 1.90%$249,000.00 $249,000.00 $256,265.82 $7,265.82 $0.00 Federal Farm Credit bank 3133ELJU9 CD RBC 1/27/2020 1/27/2026 1.98%$500,000.00 $500,000.00 $500,640.00 $640.00 $4,235.00 Federal Home Loan Banks 3130AQGS6 GB RBC 1/14/2022 1/14/2026 0.75%$750,000.00 $750,000.00 Bankunited A Svgs Bk Miami 066519QT9 CD RBC 3/31/2021 3/31/2026 0.95%$245,000.00 $245,000.00 $242,677.40 ($2,322.60)$0.00 Federal Home Loan Banks 3130ANXM7 GB RBC 9/30/2021 9/30/2026 0.50%$500,000.00 $500,000.00 $494,690.00 ($5,310.00)$625.00 Money Market MM RBC $342,790.26 $342,790.26 $342,790.26 $0.00 $0.00 $3,566,790.26 $3,566,790.26 $2,807,586.88 ($9,203.38)$5,386.58 State Bank of India, NY 856285WZ0 CD Wells Fargo 8/18/2021 8/30/2024 0.60%$247,000.00 $247,000.00 $245,594.57 ($1,405.43)$503.47 Sallie Mae Bank - UT 795451AV5 CD Wells Fargo 9/14/2021 9/22/2026 1.05%$245,000.00 $245,000.00 $242,589.20 ($2,410.80)$711.85 Morgan Stanley Private Bank 61768U3A3 CD Wells Fargo 9/21/2021 3/30/2025 0.45%$247,000.00 $247,000.00 $244,502.83 ($2,497.17)$283.21 Goldman Sachs Bk USA, NY 38149MG31 CD Wells Fargo 10/18/2021 10/27/2023 0.40%$245,000.00 $245,000.00 $244,120.45 ($879.55)$177.21 Wells Fargo Natl Bank, NV 949495AT2 CD Wells Fargo 1/23/2020 1/30/2023 1.90%$245,000.00 $245,000.00 $249,035.15 $4,035.15 $38.26 BMO Harris Bank NA 05600XCP3 CD Wells Fargo 3/23/2021 4/13/2026 1.00%$245,000.00 $245,000.00 $243,106.15 ($1,893.85)$536.98 Merrick Bank 59013KLN4 CD Wells Fargo 12/22/2020 7/1/2024 0.35%$245,000.00 $245,000.00 $242,417.70 ($2,582.30)$4.70 JP Morgan Chase 48128UHB8 CD Wells Fargo 7/21/2020 7/30/2025 0.50%$245,000.00 $245,000.00 $245,034.30 $34.30 $520.21 UBS Bank USA Salt Lake Cty 90348JR85 CD Wells Fargo 8/4/2021 8/12/2024 0.55%$245,000.00 $245,000.00 $243,390.35 ($1,609.65)$77.53 Morgan Stanley Bank 61773TCX9 CD Wells Fargo 3/31/2022 3/30/2027 2.25%$245,000.00 $245,000.00 Federal Home Loan Bank Mulit step 3130ALGY4 GB Wells Fargo 3/8/2021 3/16/2026 0.50%$250,000.00 $250,000.00 $246,845.00 ($3,155.00) Federal Home Loan Bank Mulit step 3130ALGY4 GB Wells Fargo 3/16/2021 3/16/2026 0.50%$250,000.00 $250,000.00 $246,845.00 ($3,155.00) Federal Home Laon Bank Step 3130APG82 GB Wells Fargo 10/12/2021 10/28/2026 0.70%$500,000.00 $500,000.00 $494,220.00 ($5,780.00)$612.50 Federal Home Loan Step 3130AKU61 GB Wells Fargo 1/26/2021 1/27/2026 0.30%$500,000.00 $500,000.00 $492,005.00 ($7,995.00)$641.67 Federal Home Laon Bank Multi Step 3130ALAC8 GB Wells Fargo 3/2/2021 2/26/2026 0.40%$300,000.00 $300,000.00 $294,375.00 ($5,625.00)$420.00 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3133EML9 GB Wells Fargo 11/30/2020 11/30/2023 0.31%$425,000.00 $425,000.00 $421,642.50 ($3,357.50)$113.45 Money Market MM Wells Fargo $25,557.72 $25,557.72 $25,557.72 $0.00 $0.00 $4,704,557.72 $4,704,557.72 $4,421,280.92 ($38,276.80)$4,641.04 Synchrony Bank - UT 87164YKJ2 CD UBS 10/12/2021 10/16/2023 0.40%$247,000.00 $247,000.00 $246,249.12 ($750.88)$208.41 Citibank, NA, Sioux Falls SD 17312QJ67 CD UBS 4/19/2018 4/24/2023 3.00%$246,000.00 $246,000.00 $254,231.16 $8,231.16 $1,374.89 Popular Bank NY 73317AAL6 CD UBS 3/8/2022 3/17/2025 1.93%$245,000.00 $245,000.00 Comenity Bank DE 981993FX1 CD UBS 3/8/2022 3/18/2026 2.00%$200,000.00 $200,000.00 Comstock Park MI Pub 205759KG7 GB UBS 10/3/2017 5/1/2023 2.75%$512,640.00 $500,000.00 $513,715.00 $1,075.00 $2,291.65 University of California 91412GU94 GB UBS 3/23/2022 7/1/2025 3.06%$500,000.00 $500,000.00 Virginia College 92778VEV6 GB UBS 10/3/2017 2/1/2026 2.80%$334,686.00 $330,000.00 $347,265.60 $12,579.60 $3,850.01 Money Market MM UBS $532,293.51 $532,293.51 $532,293.51 $0.00 $0.00 $2,817,619.51 $2,800,293.51 $1,893,754.39 $21,134.88 $7,724.96 Money Market MM 4M Fund 2021A $15,742,238.29 $15,742,238.29 Money Market MM 4M Fund $3,463,544.96 $3,463,544.96 $19,205,783.25 $19,205,783.25 Total $30,294,750.74 $30,277,424.74 $9,122,622.19 ($26,345.30)$17,752.58 Par Value Value Dec 31 Market Value Over (Under) Accrued Interest City of Orono As of 12/31/21 Invest Name Invest #Type Broker Purchase Date Maturity Date Rate Cost Exhibit G - Investments Page 26 of 27 Federal Home Loan Banks 3130AQGS6 GB RBC 1/14/2022 1/14/2026 0.75%$750,000.00 $750,000.00 Morgan Stanley Bank 61773TCX9 CD Wells Fargo 3/31/2022 3/30/2027 2.25%$245,000.00 $245,000.00 Popular Bank NY 73317AAL6 CD UBS 3/8/2022 3/17/2025 1.93%$245,000.00 $245,000.00 Comenity Bank DE 981993FX1 CD UBS 3/8/2022 3/18/2026 2.00%$200,000.00 $200,000.00 Par Value City of Orono As of 03/31/2022 Invest Name Invest #Type Broker Purchase Date Maturity Date Rate Cost Exhibit G - Investments Page 27 of 27 AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: mcc Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: 1. Purpose. This application is a sketch plan regarding a re-plat of the Hartzell Addition properties in order to create one additional lakeshore lot. No new lots will be created. 2. Background/ Summary. The applicant is proposing to re-plat all three lots in the Hartzell Addition in order to create an additional lakeshore lot. The LR-1C district dimensional minimums are 0.5 acre and 100-feet in width. For non-lakeshore properties the width is measured at the building setback; for lakeshore properties the width is measured at the OHWL and at the 75-foot setback. Since the Planning Commission’s review the applicant’s surveyor has reanalyzed the existing property dimensions and has determined that Lot 2, the middle lot, is 97-feet wide at the 75-foot setback (where 100-feet is required) and is currently nonconforming. They are requesting informal feedback on their sketch plan proposal to move the lot lines in order to create one more lakeshore lot. Their proposal reflects movement of the shared lot lines on all three properties. As a result, the existing Lot 3 (3005 Casco Point Rd) will become the nonconforming lot where Lot 2 (2987 Casco Point Road) is currently identified as a nonconforming lot. Lot 3 is proposed to be 65 feet wide at the ordinary high water level (OHWL), and 75 feet wide at the 75-foot setback where 100 feet is required. As proposed, each lot is shown to have a conforming building envelope. If positive feedback is provided by Council on the proposal, they intend to proceed with a preliminary plat application. 3. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On April 18, the Planning Commission discussed the applicant’s sketch plan and although no public hearing was held members of the public provided comment. The comments centered around existing drainage concerns on Casco Point Road and house locations on the properties. The draft minutes from this meeting are attached as Exhibit E. 4. Public Comment. Comments from the neighbors were received and are attached as Exhibit E. 5. Staff Analysis. Originally, Staff did not support the proposal as there were no practical difficulties supporting the creation of a nonconforming lot where 3 conforming lots existed. The new information regarding the existing nonconformity of Lot 2 changes the analysis. While there are two conforming, and one non-conforming lots now, at the conclusion of this process there will be 2 conforming and 1 non- conforming lots. The non-conforming status is proposed to change from one lot (Lot 2) to another (Lot 3). The other issue for discussion is the creation of a new lakeshore lot and the challenges that poses to the lake and to the neighborhood. The proposed plat resolves an irregular lot shape, where a portion of the lake yard of lot 2 is lakeward of the building site of lot 1. As they have existed under the ownership of one family there have been no notable issues. However, the awkwardness of owning a property where at its narrowest point there is a 10-foot separation between the property line and the lake could prove to be problematic for future owners of both properties (Lot 1 and Lot 2) which would outweigh the potential issues that an additional lakeshore lot could cause. Item No.: 15 Date: May 9, 2022 Item Description: LA22-000012 – Sven Gustafson – Stonewood LLC 2987 and 3005 Casco Point Rd and PID 20-117-23-34-0027 - Sketch Plan Presenter: Melanie Curtis Planner Agenda Section: Community Development Report AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: mcc Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Direct the applicant regarding their request. Exhibits A. Applicant’s Updated Narrative + Practical Difficulties B. Proposed Plans C. Aerial Photos D. Draft PC Minutes E. Public Comment F. PC Staff Report References PC Exhibits 04/18/2022 A. Proposed Plat B. Aerial Photos C. City Code Sections D. Public Comment Three buildable parcels currently exist on the subject property. Two conforming lots and one non-conforming lot currently exist. Consistent Outcome: Two lots are currently conforming, one is non-conforming (only in width). The requested lot line change will result in the same – 3 buildable properties, 2 conforming, 1 non- conforming (only in width). This aspect was not made clear in the presentation to the Planning Commission as we’ve since learned that the center lot falls short of the conforming width by several feet. (See Gronberg e-mail.) Strange Configuration: The current lot lines are odd and result in 1 property being separated from the lake by a triangle of property that is owned by the neighboring property and contains a lake oriented structure (boathouse). In its current state, the neighboring property has ownership of and access to the backyard of the neighboring property. This is awkward and will create undue hardship for the owner of the Northern lot (Lot 1). Use, landscaping, dock location, etc… by the owners of the center lot (Lot 2) will impair the enjoyment of the owners of Lot 1. Drainage from Lot 1 across the triangle portion of lot 2 will cause future neighbor disputes. Size: All of our proposed lots are larger than what is required to conform. Where ½ (0.5) acre is required our lots are: 0.7, 0.75, 0.73 in size. Consistent with Neighborhood: Looking at 15 lots to the north, and 15 to the South helps to understand the character of the neighborhood in the size and width of the properties. While one lot stands out as an anomaly at double the typical size and 4 times the lakeshore width, most lots are fairly consistent in size and width. - 2 of our 3 proposed lots are wider than 75% of the 30 adjacent lots. - 75% of the lots in the neighborhood at are non-conforming in width. - Only 8 of the 30 lots in the group are conforming in width and area. - If approved, our non-conforming “lot 3” would be larger than 2/3rds of the adjacent lots and wider than 12 of the 30 lots. Consistent with prior approvals: We’re asking for less than the approved variance we referenced on Wildhurst. That proposal took 2 conforming properties and resulted in 2 non-conforming properties. We’re requesting only a reconfiguration of lot lines resulting in 2 conforming and 1 non- conforming lots, the same as currently exists. Improving many aspects: • Hardcover will conform – currently the tennis court lot is over the allowed impervious surface. The resulting lots will conform with the impervious cover restrictions. • Drainage – The tennis court on Lot 1 currently entirely drains to the street. We’ll work to direct as much water as possible to the lake. • Gravel driveway washout is an issue. Driveways will be a hard surface that will not wash into the street. • We desire to align the lake setback of the 3 homes that will be built to create consistency. We’ve worked with the neighbors to assure them that we intend to preserve or improve their current lake views. Practical Difficulties Statement 1. “Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance . . . .” Three lots exist currently. Two are conforming, one is non-conforming and this ratio will remain unchanged. The density is not proposed to increase. The size of the proposed parcels is consistent with the other properties in the neighborhood and comply with the City Code. The lot width variance would also be in harmony with the Ordinance. 2. “Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan.” The requested variances allow the development and redevelopment of each of the single family lots. Single family lots with a residential use is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. “Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. ‘Practical difficulties,’ as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The property owner wishes to rearrange the property lines. Density will not increase as a result of the lot line adjustments. The parcels will be developed with new single family homes which will be required to meet the LR-1C district and Shoreland district setbacks. To rearrange the property lines, the requested variance must be granted. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The property owner did not create the original lot configuration, width, and lake frontage of the Properties. c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.” The proposed variances will not change the number of buildable properties, will not alter the views of any neighboring properties, will allow for better drainage of the properties toward the lake – helping to solve neighborhood drainage issues, and will alleviate potential neighbor lake view and property access issues. The size and width of the proposed parcels are consistent, and in fact exceed, the character of the locality. 4. “Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.” The basis for the variance is to facilitate the reconfiguration of the lots to allow homes to be built with lakeshore views and consistent setback from the lake. The odd triangular portion of lot 2 will not allow a home to be built which makes it difficult to use of their backyard. This practical difficulty keeps the land from being developed to the full potential and best use. The home location on Lot 1 is currently pushed further from the lake than both neighbors. This will impair the views and result in a home that must look at the sides of the adjacent homes and loss of sunlight. 5. “Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.” This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.” This condition is not applicable as the residential use is allowed under LR-1C district. 7. “The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.” This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.” The configuration of the properties is odd. The narrow portion of Lot 2 that separates Lot 1 from the lake is awkward, unique and specific to these parcels. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.” The proposed parcels are generally consistent with neighboring properties in respect to size, width and configuration. 10. “The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.” With respect to Lot 1, we believe this to be the case in respect to privacy, views, access to sunlight and other aspects that any property owner would expect to enjoy. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter.” The variance will not increase the density or intensity of the lots. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. 12. “The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.” The overall size of the properties does not allow for the practical difficulties to be overcome without the approval of the lot width variance. The previously approved odd configuration of the lots as well as the non-conforming width created the difficulty. The requested lot width variance is necessary to reconfigure the lot lines and create 3 lake lots where two lake lots and one non-lake lot currently exist. The request is reasonable and is consistent with previously approved variance requests. Lot widths markg@gronbergassoc.com <markg@gronbergassoc.com> Fri 4/22/2022 3 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, April 18, 2022 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ 2. LA22-000012 Stonewood LLC, 2987 + 3005 Casco Point Rd and PID 20-117-23-34-0027, Sketch Plan (Staff: Melanie Curtis) Michael Gorman, property owner, and Sven Gustafson, Stonewood LLC, were present. City Planner Curtis gave a summary of the item noting the Hartzell Addition was platted in 1985. Each of the lots are conforming with respect to area and width. Lot 1 containing the tennis court was platted as a non-lakeshore lot; Lots 2 and 3 were platted as lakeshore lots. The Applicant is proposing to re-plat all three lots and is requesting informal feedback on their sketch plan proposal to move the lot lines in order to create one more lakeshore lot. In order to create a third lakeshore lot, one of the three lots will become non-conforming with respect to width. Their proposal reflects movement of the shared lot lines on all three properties. As a result, the existing Lot 3 (3005 Casco Point Rd) is proposed to be 65 feet wide at the ordinary high water level (OHWL), and 75 feet wide at the 75-foot setback where 100 feet is required. The Applicant is requesting feedback and if positive feedback is obtained they intend to proceed with the preliminary plat application. McCutcheon noted this is a non-conforming proposal. Curtis replied in the affirmative. Kirchner asked if Lot 3 is currently conforming but would be non-conforming. Curtis replied in the affirmative. Kirchner stated they are taking a conforming lot and making it non-conforming to plat another lakeshore lot. Curtis replied in the affirmative. Bonnie Martinson, 2970 Casco Point Road, could write a book about the drainage issues across the street from those properties. In 2010 a new drain was put in which was supposed to take care of the drainage issues coming from the Hartzell property and the other side, as well. A new house was built across the street some time ago and they removed a catch basin. Ms. Martinson and another neighbor are very concerned regarding drainage on those properties because right now the drainage from the Hartzell property is coming down the road into the drains which go across their properties and drain into the lake. The 2010 drain they put in is not adequate. Ms. Martinson has pictures to show what happens when it rains in their area. In 2010, the City’s Engineer decided to put a catch basin between Ms. Martinson’s house and the neighbors that was supposed to catch debris from the gravel that washes down the drain and is supposedly to be vacuumed out on a yearly basis. Ms. Martinson does not know if Orono even has a vac to get the debris out and noted it never gets cleaned out. All of the debris goes through the drain and the rest goes onto Ms. Martinson’s and the neighbor’s properties. She thinks it really needs to be looked at by the City to understand what happens when it rains and how the drainage flows. Sven Gustafson, Stonewood LLC, does not think the removal of the catch basin Ms. Martinson mentioned ever happened. He noted they had an approved drainage plan that was followed and this is the first he’s heard that there is any concern about drainage created by that property. His clients intend to build personal homes on the subject property and are focused on making the lots more consistent with the MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, April 18, 2022 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ neighborhood, creating three properties as similar as possible while keeping the non-conformity to a minimum. Ms. Gustafson did a study of 15 lots north and south of this property and of those lots only eight are conforming in width and area. If approved, the third lot would be larger than 20 of the adjacent lots and wider than 12 of the 30 lots. He noted the City has approved similar requests including one on Wildhurst that took two conforming lots and made them into non-conforming lakeshore lots, so there is precedent. He also met with neighbors and explained what would happen and believes they have support of those neighbors. Dan Seidel, 3015 Casco Point Road, met on Friday with the potential homeowner and Stonewood and it sounds like they have some nice plans. The only issue Mr. Seidel has is if they only issue a plat what happens if for whatever reason the homeowners do not go forward? He has heard that the middle lot could move down to within 75 feet of the lakeshore and if that happens it changes the tennis court setback and Mr. Seidel’s setback is roughly where it is now but possibly creates some unintended consequences. It would also be helpful if the approval included where the houses will be. The neighbors are concerned that if it gets approved and someone builds on their non-conforming lot, now they need to get variances to make the house fit. Mr. Seidel said the Applicants seem like really good people and he looks forward to having them as neighbors. John Miller, 2980 Casco Point Road, has been out there for 10 years and can say that it turns into a river when it rains, even if it is a 1.5 inch rain and it washes out the grass. He said when people come and want to build a dream home, they come to the City asking for a couple inches here and there. Mr. Miller thinks the City needs to let the developers know they must draw the line. He noted there was a catch basin when he moved in and did not notice any water drain between the properties while he now notices it almost every time it rains. Mr. Miller understands that the Hartzell lot is big and it could be three homes, but he thinks the City should set the precedent of what it should be to the new homeowners and try to maintain the rules so developers don’t buy a property banking on the fact that they will come to the City and get whatever they ask for. The Commissioners discussed the item. Ressler noted they see a lot of odd-shaped lots on the lake. Clearly someone wanted a lot for their tennis courts at one point. Now they want to turn the tennis courts into a non-conforming lake lot and that is where Ressler gets hung up. It would make more sense to him to redraw the plat as two lots, both of them conforming because there are two lake lots there already. He does not think the City is in the business of creating more lake lots. Kirchner agrees, it seems they are stealing from a lake lot to create another lake lot and are now making one non-conforming. He struggles with that idea and pointed out they do not know that the houses would be built to the rear of those angle points where it is 100 feet and conforming. Kraemer thinks they did a great job drawing the plat and getting three lots that would conform at the building setback lines. The fact that there are a lot of non-conforming shoreline lengths in the neighborhood does seem to fit the nature of the neighborhood. If the Applicant would come back with a proposal Kraemer would like it to include where the houses will be so those questions can be answered. Erickson noted number two of the practical difficulties list says the plight of the landowner must be due to circumstances unique to the property and not created by the landowner. Here they have an Applicant MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, April 18, 2022 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ seeking to create non-conforming lots. State law regulates the definition of practical difficulty and Erickson cannot support the variance. Libby stated usually people want a lakeshore lot so they can have a dock. In Orono they have regulatory compliance for a dock and he stated this is fairly linear, although non-conforming which is an obstacle. He is confident with the other scrutiny this would have to go through that a prudent decision will be made at a City Council level on whether or not the extra lot can be done. McCutcheon does not think they need to create more lake lots on Lake Minnetonka and if it does not fit the conforming lots that Staff proposes he would not allow the 80 foot lake lot. From:Jon Miller To:Melanie Curtis Subject:Development Concerns with Hartzle property 2987 Casco Pt Rd Date:Wednesday, March 9, 2022 9:18:46 AM Hi Melanie, Good talking to you yesterday and thanks for the insight on everything. As i discussed my concerns are related to the water flow that comes down the street to a single drain between our property (2980) and Bonnie Martinsons which empties into Casco Cove. I understand the city has ordinances and that engineering was done beforehand to plan for the water flow but the fact is that is that it is not working. With the developments of neighboring properties over the years there is a much higher frequency of wash outs (water coming over the berm and going through the properties) and is now happening from "normal" rains. I understand water has to go somewhere and feel Im practical about that fact but what concerns me is the city may overlook considering what is happening now with the wash outs and and how the development of this property will exacerbate the issue with the water flow. I also understand the difficult situation after someone has bought the property with dreams of what they want (example would be on how the lots get built up high so even though hard cover is in accordance with the city rules the slope leads to water flowing like it was essentially hard cover). I think it would be best that before this property gets sold or developed the city thinks ahead about how the City can try to correct the issue of the water flow. A possible idea would be to do a catch pond like the one that was at one of the neighboring properties before it got removed or add another drain going to the other side of the lake. Sincerely, Jon Miller 2980 Casco Pt Rd c: 218-689-2496 From:Neil Goodwin To:Melanie Curtis Cc:Barbara Goodwin; Chris Heim; michael@splitrock.com Subject:Heim/Gorman lot line proposal for Casco Pt. Date:Tuesday, April 26, 2022 1:02:10 PM Melanie, Barb and I have reviewed the planned lot line revision being proposed by the Heim and Gorman families and support their plan. We reviewed it with them, Stonewood, and Peter Eskuche and believe their plan maintains the integrity and character of the surrounding properties. They respect everyone’s interests and we believe they will build homes that will fit in with the neighborhood. Sincerely, Neil & Barb Goodwin 612-801-6303 From:Neil Goodwin To:Melanie Curtis Cc:Barbara Goodwin Subject:Fwd: Stonewood"s Application - LA22-000012 Date:Thursday, April 14, 2022 9:25:33 AM Melanie, Thanks for the follow up note below. We would appreciate the following concerns with the above referenced project being addressed in order for us to support it moving forward: 1. Infringement of our view of the lake. New construction should not extend past (ie. towards the lake) a theoretical line between the existing houses. 2. Drainage concerns. New construction should not be raised up to funnel drainage water down towards our property (2975 Casco Pt. Rd.) The natural/existing grade of the adjacent lot is below our property and should be maintained. 3. Height of a new house next to our property. The height of our existing roof line is slightly below the house recently built on the adjacent lot north of our house (Oare’s). We want the new construction roofline to not extend above ours, and to follow the natural/existing grade of the property. Please confirm receipt of this email. Thank you for keeping us updated with the status of this project. Sincerely, Neil & Barb Goodwin ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Barb Goodwin <bngoody@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 9:23 AM Subject: Fwd: Stonewood's Application - LA22-000012 To: Neil Goodwin <ngoody10@gmail.com> Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Melanie Curtis <MCurtis@ci.orono.mn.us> Date: April 13, 2022 at 3:14:20 PM EDT Subject: Stonewood's Application - LA22-000012 Hi there! Just checking in to see if you had any formal comments to include in the planning commission packet for Monday’s meeting? If so, please send them to me in a separate email by tomorrow before noon. I’ve attached the plan. On Friday afternoon/evening the packet will be available on our website. Thanks! Melanie Melanie Curtis, Planner Direct 952.249.4627 Planning & Zoning Office 952.249.4620 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Email: mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us Website: www.ci.orono.mn.us All permits and applications are handled through our online portal - LINK! From:Dan Seidel To:Melanie Curtis Cc:Helena Seidel; Neil Goodwin Subject:FW: Stonewood"s Application - LA22-000012 Date:Thursday, April 14, 2022 9:44:06 AM Attachments:image002.png image003.png From: Dan Seidel Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2022 9:15 AM To: Helena Seidel <Helena@BankersTitleMN.com> Subject: RE: Stonewood's Application - LA22-000012 Good morning Melanie We are Helena and Daniel Seidel and we reside at 3015 Casco Point Road. We would be the neighbors next to the proposed South Parcel on the drawings submitted by Stonewood, LLC. We are opposed to the proposed replatting of the Hartzell Addition. First, the replatting creates a non-conforming lot next to our lot. In order to have the new plat approved, we believe Stonewood would need to receive a Variance in order to split the current parcel into 3 lots. Stonewood would need to prove a Practical Difficulty in order for their plan to be approved. Based on a review of the standards for approving Practical Difficulties, Stonewood does not meet these standards. 2 large homes currently sit on the property and those homes could be rebuilt or refurbished without any difficulty. Second, the City of Orono had good public policy reasons for setting the minimum lot size when it was originally established. Overcrowding with more boats and more docks is always a concern on Lake Minnetonka. Increased hard cover on the lake threatens the water quality of the Lake. Our area of Casco Point Road has had drainage problems over the years and this project will no doubt effect runoff and drainage. Third, there is a neighborhood perception that the development and building rules are not laws but mere suggestions to potential developers and builders. The perception is that the rules don’t matter because a Variance will just be granted. The integrity of the building laws and land use laws is important to homeowners especially considering the investment that lakeshore owners have in their properties. Homeowners (taxpayers) should be able to rely on the development and building laws rather than be fearful that excessive variances will be issued to erode the current laws. Lastly, if the replatting is approved, it will create a new vacant lot (the North Parcel). Suddenly, a question arises as to what the set-back rules are for the new homes being built. Playing it out, if the plan is approved and the current homes are demolished, we have been told the home on the middle lot could be built to the 75 foot setback line. This would be an injustice to the homeowner (Goodwins) to the North of the Hartzell Addition. Also, once that home is built to 75 feet, we are sure the builder of the lot next to us will seek variances to build next to the new house on the middle lot and thus greatly impeding our lake views and diminishing the value of our property. We strongly encourage the Planning Commission and City Council to consider this domino effect when deciding on the proposed replat of Hartzell Addition. In the event that the proposed Replat occurs, we believe there must be something in writing establishing the set-back rules so this anomaly in the laws cannot be taken advantage of. This could be done by requiring a deed restriction or making the replat approval subject to establishing set back requirements based on the property before the homes are taken down. We have discussed our concerns with Sven from Stonewood Homes. We have a meeting at his office with the potential homeowners on Friday 4/15. We want to be good neighbors and we want the new owners to enjoy the Casco Point neighborhood as much as we have for the last 18 years. Sven has made indications that his proposed new homes set-back would be in line with the current set-back lines. We need more than a handshake in this regard. We all know things could change. Stonewood and/or new homeowners could change their mind and a new buyer/builder could come in and take advantage of the Replat if approved. Thank you for taking the time to review our concerns. I can be reached at (651) 226-3334 with any questions or comments. Than you again. Personal State License Number: 63785 Company State License Number: 40225610 Named a "Top 10 Title Company" in the Greater Twin Cities metro area by Minneapolis/St. Paul Business Journal 2013 Top 25 List Confidential and Proprietary: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and privileged material intended solely for the useof the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the namedaddressee, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender anddestroy all copies. From: Melanie Curtis <MCurtis@ci.orono.mn.us> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2022 2:14 PM Subject: [External] Stonewood's Application - LA22-000012 Hi there! Just checking in to see if you had any formal comments to include in the planning commission packet for Monday’s meeting? If so, please send them to me in a separate email by tomorrow before noon. I’ve attached the plan. On Friday afternoon/evening the packet will be available on our website. Thanks! Melanie Melanie Curtis, Planner Direct 952.249.4627 Planning & Zoning Office 952.249.4620 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Email: mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us Website: www.ci.orono.mn.us All permits and applications are handled through our online portal - LINK! To: Chair McCutcheon and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc Date: 18 April 2022 Subject: #LA22-000012, Sven Gustafson – Stonewood LLC 2987 and 3005 Casco Point Rd and PID 20-117-23-34-0027 Sketch Plan Background The Hartzell Addition was platted in 1985. Each of the lots are conforming with respect to area and width. Lot 1 containing the tennis court was platted as a non-lakeshore lot; Lots 2 and 3 were platted as lakeshore lots. Proposal The applicant is proposing to re-plat all three lots. They are requesting informal feedback on their sketch plan proposal to move the lot lines in order to create one more lakeshore lot. In order to create a third lakeshore lot, one of the three lots will become nonconforming with respect to width. Their proposal reflects movement of the shared lot lines on all three properties. As a result, the existing Lot 3 (3005 Casco Point Rd) is proposed to be 65 feet wide at the ordinary high water level (OHWL), and 75 feet wide at the 75-foot setback where 100 feet is required. As proposed, each lot is shown to have a conforming building envelope. If positive feedback is provided by Planning Commission and Council on the proposal, they intend to proceed with a preliminary plat application. Applicable Regulations: Lot Width Variance (Sec 78-350) The LR-1C district requires 100 feet in width at the ordinary high water level (OHWL) and at the 75-foot setback for Lake Minnetonka. Together, the properties have an approximate 264 feet in width as measured at the OHWL and 285 feet at the 75-foot setback. There should be at least 300 feet at these points to support three lakeshore lots. According to City Code Section 78-1 Definitions., Lot width means the horizontal distance between side lot lines measured at the following locations: (1) For lots which do not abut a lake or tributary, at the rear of the required front yard, measured parallel to the front lot line. (2) For lots which abut a lake or tributary, at the shoreline measured in a straight line between the points at which the side lot lines intersect the OHWL, and at the required structure setback from the OHWL, measured in a straight line between the points of intersection of the side lot lines with the structure setback line. FILE # LA22-000012 18 April 2022 Page 2 of 2 LR-1C Requirements Lot Area 21.780 s.f. (0.5 acres) Lot Width (OHWL & 75-foot SB) 100’ 2987 Casco Point Rd Lot 2 Existing = 0.8 acre (35,172 s.f.) 199’ @ OHWL / 95’ @ 75’ Proposed = 0.75 acre (32,714 s.f.) 100’ @ OHWL / 102’ @ 75’ 3005 Casco Point Rd Lot 3 Existing = 0.84 acre (36,897 s.f.) 100’ @ OHWL / 100’ @ 75’ Proposed = 0.73 acre (31,819 s.f.) 65’ @ OHWL / 75’ @ 75’ Variance Required Tennis Court Lot Lot 1 Existing = 0.52 acre (23,043 s.f.) 101’ @ Casco Point Rd Non-lakeshore lot Proposed = 0.7 acre (30,579 s.f.) 100’ @ OHWL / 106’ @ 75’ NEW lakeshore lot Staff Analysis The purpose for this application is to increase marketability by creating a third lakeshore lot. The Planning Commission and Council should determine whether or not the plat is appropriate given that a variance will be required. There is a sufficient buildable area on each property to accommodate a new home in a conforming location. Public Comments Comments from the public have been received and are attached as Exhibit D. Issues for Consideration 1. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning staff does not find justifiable reasoning to support the lot width variance to create one additional lakeshore lot. The properties are currently conforming. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Proposed Plat Exhibit B. Aerial Photos Exhibit C. City Code Sections Exhibit D. Public Comment