Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJumppanen Wetland Delineation Report_9_15_2021_10_58_11_281940 Lakeview Terrace Site City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report Prepared for Barbara Jumppanen by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES Project No. 2021-152) August 26th, 2021 1940 Lakeview Terrace Site Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page 1. WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY .......................................................................... 1 2. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................ 1 3. METHODS .............................................................................................................................. 2 4. RESULTS ................................................................................................................................ 3 4.1 Review of NWI, Soils, Public Waters and NHD Information ........................................... 3 4.2 Wetland Determinations and Delineations......................................................................... 4 4.3 Other Areas ........................................................................................................................ 4 4.4 Request for Wetland Boundary and Jurisdictional Determination .................................... 4 5. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION .............................................................................. 5 FIGURES 1. Site Location 2. Existing Conditions 3. National Wetlands Inventory 4. Soil Survey 5. DNR Public Waters Inventory 6. National Hydrography Dataset APPENDICES A. Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota B. Wetland Delineation Data Forms C. Precipitation Data D. Photos 1 1940 Lakeview Terrace Site Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report 1. WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY • The 1-acre 1940 Lakeview Terrace Site was inspected on July 29th, 2021 for the presence and extent of wetland. • The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map showed one PEM1C wetland within the site boundaries. • The soil survey showed Hamel (Partially Hydric) as the hydric soil type mapped within the site boundaries. • The DNR Public Waters Inventory did not show any DNR Public Waters, Wetlands, or Waterways within 1,000 feet of the site boundaries. • The National Hydrography Dataset did not show any waterbodies, flowlines, or areas within 1,000 feet of the site boundaries. • One Type 3 PEM1Cd shallow marsh wetland was delineated within site boundaries. 1940 Lakeview Terrace Site Wetland Delineation Report 2 2. OVERVIEW The 1-acre 1940 Lakeview Terrace Site was inspected on July 29th, 2021 for the presence and extent of wetland. The property was located in Section 27, Township 118 North, Range 23 West, City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The site was situated northeast of the intersection of Lakeview Terrace and Brown Road North (Figure 1). The property corresponded to Hennepin County PID#: 2711823420007. The 1940 Lakeview Terrace Site consisted of woodland, partially mowed meadow, and a wetland. Topography of the site sloped from 1016 ft MSL on the northeastern portion of the site down to 1012 ft MSL within the wetland on the northwestern portion. Surrounding land use consisted of single-family homes. One wetland was delineated within the site boundaries. The delineated wetland boundaries and existing conditions are shown on Figure 2. Appendix A of this report includes a Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota, which is submitted in request for: (1) a wetland boundary and type determination under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), and (2) delineation concurrence and Approved Jurisdictional determination under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. 3. METHODS Wetlands were identified using the Routine Determination method described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Waterways Experiment Station, 1987) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region (Version 2.0) as required under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Wetland boundaries were identified as the upper-most extent of wetland that met criteria for hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology. Wetland-upland boundaries were marked with pin flags that were located using a Trimble R1 GPS Unit. Soils, vegetation, and hydrology were documented at a representative location along the wetland- upland boundary. Plant species dominance was estimated based on the percent aerial or basal coverage visually estimated within a 30-foot radius for trees and vines, a 15-foot radius for the shrub layer, and a 5-foot radius for the herbaceous layer within the community type sampled. Soils were characterized to a minimum depth of 24 inches (unless otherwise noted) using a Munsell Soil Color Book and standard soil texturing methodology. Hydric soil indicators used are from Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA Natural Resources 1940 Lakeview Terrace Site Wetland Delineation Report 3 Conservation Service (NRCS) in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils, Version 8.1, 2017). Mapped soils are separated into five classes based on the composition of hydric components and the Hydric Rating by Map Unit color classes utilized on Web Soil Survey. The five classes include Hydric (100 percent hydric components), Predominantly Hydric (66 to 99 percent hydric components), Partially Hydric (33 to 65 percent hydric components), Predominantly Non-Hydric (1 to 32 percent hydric components), and Non-Hydric (less than one percent hydric components). Plants were identified using standard regional plant keys. Taxonomy and indicator status of plant species was taken from the 2016 National Wetland Plant List (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2016. National Wetland Plant List, version 3.3, Engineer Research and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH). 4. RESULTS 4.1 Review of NWI, Soils, Public Waters, and NHD Information The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) (Minnesota Geospatial Commons 2009-2014 and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) showed one PEM1C wetland within the site boundaries (Figure 3). The Soil Survey (USDA NRCS 2015) showed Hamel (Partially Hydric) as hydric soil mapped within the site boundaries. All soil types mapped on the property are listed in Table 1, and a map showing soil types is included in Figure 4. Table 1. Soil types mapped on 1940 Lakeview Terrace Site Symbol Soil Name Acres % of Area % Hydric Hydric Category U1A Urban land-Udorthents, wet substratum, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0.5 52.3 0 Non-Hydric L36A Hamel, overwash-Hamel complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes 0.5 47.7 45 Partially Hydric The Minnesota DNR Public Waters Inventory (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2015) did not show any DNR Public Waters, Wetlands or Waterways within 1000 feet of the site boundaries (Figure 5). The National Hydrography Dataset (U.S. Geological Survey 2015) did not show any waterbodies, flowlines, or areas within 1,000 feet of the site boundaries (Figure 6). 1940 Lakeview Terrace Site Wetland Delineation Report 4 4.2 Wetland Determinations and Delineations Potential wetlands were evaluated during field observations on July 29, 2021. One wetland was identified and delineated on the property (Figure 2). Corresponding data forms are included in Appendix B. The following descriptions of the wetland and adjacent upland reflects conditions observed at the time of the field visit. Herbaceous vegetation was actively growing at the time of the wetland delineation. Precipitation conditions were drier than the normal range based on available 30-day rolling total precipitation and drier than normal based on the three-month antecedent precipitation data (Appendix C). Wetland 1 was a Type 3 (PEM1Cd) shallow marsh wetland dominated by smartweed, an unknown grass, cattail, jewelweed, and red clover, with a lesser amount of rough cinquefoil, Kentucky bluegrass, oak-leaved goosefoot, blue vervain, common plantain, and scattered boxelder. The wetland was saturated at 24 inches and the water table was at 30 inches. Secondary hydrology indicators including FAC-Neutral Test and Geomorphic Position and a hydric soil indicator were observed. Adjacent upland consisted of mowed meadow dominated by ground ivy, smooth crab grass, and scattered boxelder, with a lesser amount of red clover, common plantain, and common dandelion. Primary and secondary hydrology indicators were not observed on the upland. The wetland boundary corresponded to a topographic rise that coincided with a transition from hydrophytic plant species to upland plant species. The wetland was shown as a PEM1C wetland on the NWI map and fell in an area mapped as Hamel (Partially Hydric) and Urban land- Udorthents (Non-Hydric) on the soil survey. A shallow excavated ditch (Excavated Ditch #1) runs through the middle of Wetland 1 and extends through the eastern and southern portion of the site. Photos of the ditch are in Appendix D. Excavated Ditch #1 drains into Wetland 1 from the north and the east and flows south through the site, ultimately through the culverts and under Lakeview Terrace. 4.3 Other Areas The northeast corner of the site was mapped as Hamel (Partially Hydric), but hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology indicators were not observed here. No other areas were shown as wetland on the NWI map. 4.4 Request for Wetland Boundary and Jurisdictional Determination Appendix A of this report includes a Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota, which is submitted in request for: (1) a wetland boundary and type determination under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), and (2) delineation concurrence and Approved Jurisdictional Determination under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. 1940 Lakeview Terrace Site Wetland Delineation Report 5 5. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION Mark Kjolhaug, Professional Wetland Scientist No. 000845 The procedures utilized in the described delineation are based on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual as required under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. This wetland delineation and report were prepared in compliance with the regulatory standards in place at the time the work was performed. Site boundaries indicated on figures within this report are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Delineation completed by: Adam Cameron, Wetland Ecologist/GIS Specialist Minnesota Certified Wetland Delineator No. 1321 Holly Francart, Project Assistant Report prepared by: Holly Francart, Project Assistant Report reviewed by: ____________________________________ Date: August 26th, 2021 1940 Lakeview Terrace Site Wetland Delineation Report FIGURES 1. Site Location 2. Existing Conditions 3. National Wetlands Inventory 4. Soil Survey 5. DNR Protected Waters Inventory 6. National Hydrography Dataset © OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA Figure 1 - Site Location Map 1940 Lakeview Terrace (KES 2021-152)Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approxim ate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 300 Feet Site Boun dary Source: ESRI Streets Basemap Sixth Avenue North Lakeview Terrace B r o w n R o a d N o r t h ") ") XY XY 1 0 2 0 1018 1014 1016 1022 1024 1026 1028 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1014 1022 1014 1024 1020 1020 1016 1 0 1 4 1 0 2 2 1016 1016 1020 10181022 1 0 1 2 Figure 2 - Existing Con dition s 1940 Lakeview Terrace (KES 2021-152)Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approxim ate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 75 Feet Site Boun dary XY Culvert Tra nsect Wetlan d Bo undary Ditch ")Ph oto Points Henne pin Coun ty Lida r Photo 2 Source: MNGEO Spatial C ommons SP1-1 Wetlan d 10.0 7 Acres Excavated Ditch #1~370 feet Photo 1 PEM1C PEM1A Figure 3 - National Wetlands Inventory 1940 Lakeview Terrace (KES 2021-152)Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approxim ate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 75 Feet Hennepin County NW I ATTRIBUTE PEM1A PEM1C Site Boun dary Source: MNGEO Spatial C ommons, USFWS L36A U1A L40B L26A L22C2L22D2L22D2 Figure 4 - Soil Survey 1940 Lakeview Terrace (KES 2021-152)Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approxim ate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 75 Feet Site Boun dary Pa rtia lly Hydric Pred ominan tly Non -H yd ric/No n-Hydric Source: MNGEO Spatial C ommons, USDA, NRCS *See narrative for soil d escriptions Dickey's (27-161 W) Wolsfeld (27-157 P) Long Lake Creek (M-056-007) Figure 5 - DNR Public Waters Inventory 1940 Lakeview Terrace (KES 2021-152)Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approxim ate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 500 Feet Pu blic Wate rco urse Pu blic Wate rs Site Boun dary Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, MN DNR Figure 6 - National Hydrography Dataset 1940 Lakeview Terrace (KES 2021-152)Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approxim ate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 500 Feet Hydro Ju nctio n Artificial Path Stream/River Lake/Po nd Site Boun dary Source: MNGEO Spatial C ommons, USGS 1940 Lakeview Terrace Site Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX A Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota Project Name and/or Number: Jumppanen – 1940 Lakeview Terrace / KES# 2021-152 PART ONE: Applicant Information If applicant is an entity (company, government entity, partnership, etc.), an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent (consultant, lawyer, or other third party) and has authorized them to act on their behalf, the ag ent’s contact information must also be provided. Applicant/Landowner Name: Barbara Jumppanen Mailing Address: 3500 Vicksburg Ln N#170 Plymouth, MN 55357 Phone: (612) 735-3976 E-mail Address: Bjumppanen@outlook.com Authorized Contact (do not complete if same as above): Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail Address: Agent Name: Adam Cameron, Kjolhaug Environmental Services Mailing Address: 2500 Shadywood Road #130, Orono MN 55331 Phone: 952-401-8757 Ext. #106 E-mail Address: Adam@kjolhaugenv.com PART TWO: Site Location Information County: Hennepin City/Township: Orono Parcel ID and/or Address: 2711823420007 / 1940 Lakeview Terrace, Orono, MN 55356 Legal Description (Section, Township, Range): S27 T118N R23W Lat/Long (decimal degrees): 44.998195, -93.572251 Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets, roads, highways. Approximate size of site (acres) or if a linear project, length (feet): 1 Acre If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you must provide the names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatoryDocs/engform_4345_2012oct.pdf PART THREE: General Project/Site Information If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination, jurisdictional determination, or other correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. Describe the project that is being proposed, the project purpose and need, and schedule for implementation and completion. The project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements that effect aquatic resources (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing the location, character, and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. Wetland delineation report submitted for planning. Project Name and/or Number: Jumppanen – 1940 Lakeview Terrace / KES# 2021-152 PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource Impact1 Summary If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) identif y each impact in the table below. Include all anticipated impacts, including those expected to be temporary. Attach an overhead view map, aerial photo, and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the project area and the location(s) of the proposed imp acts. Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table. Aquatic Resource ID (as noted on overhead view) Aquatic Resource Type (wetland, lake, tributary etc.) Type of Impact (fill, excavate, drain, or remove vegetation) Duration of Impact Permanent (P) or Temporary (T)1 Size of Impact2 Overall Size of Aquatic Resource 3 Existing Plant Community Type(s) in Impact Area4 County, Major Watershed #, and Bank Service Area # of Impact Area5 1If impacts are temporary; enter the duration of the impacts in days next to the “T”. For example, a project with a temporary access fill that would be removed after 220 days would be entered “T (220)”. 2Impacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre. Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating first the linear feet of impact along the flowline of the stream followed by the area impact in parentheses). For example, a project that impacts 50 feet of a stream that is 6 feet wide would be reported as 50 ft (300 square feet). 3This is generally only applicable if you are applying for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules 8420.0420 Subp. 8, otherwise enter “N/A”. 4Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3rd Ed. as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp. 2. 5Refer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp. 7. If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred, identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated with each: PART FIVE: Applicant Signature Check here if you are requesting a pre-application consultation with the Corps and LGU based on the information you have provided. Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked. By signature below, I attest that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further attest that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein. Signature: Date: I hereby authorize Kjolhaug Environmental to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this application. 1 The term “impact” as used in this joint application form is a generic term used for disclosure purposes to identify activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to indicate whether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement. Project Name and/or Number: Jumppanen – 1940 Lakeview Terrace / KES# 2021-152 Attachment A Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or Jurisdictional Determination By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District (Corps) and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit (LGU) provide me with the following (check all that apply): Wetland Type Confirmation Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU concurring, not concurring, or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone, the Corps will not address the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property, only the boundaries of the resources within the review ar ea (including wetlands, tributaries, lakes, etc.). Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination. A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) is a non-binding written indication from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements, a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. Approved Jurisdictional Determination. An approved jurisdictional determination (AJD) is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property. AJDs can generally be relied upon by the affected party for five years. An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process. AJD requested for Wetlands In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request, the wetland delineation mu st be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual, and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota (2013). http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/DelineationJDGuidance.aspx 1940 Lakeview Terrace Site Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX B Wetland Delineation Data Forms Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A) (B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 ` Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 Chenopodium glaucum 8 Verbena hastata 9 Plantago major 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s): Adam Cameron, Holly Francart Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner: Barbara Jumppanen State: depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: N Urban land - Udorthents (non-hydric)NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat: Long:---------------Datum:----------------- X X Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? No Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 1If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions were drier than normal based on the gridded database method and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. Vegetation, soils, and hydrology were disturbed by mowing, fill, and excavated ditches, respectively. Vegetation was partially mowed, therefore, "normal circumstances" do not exist. Y Acer Negundo 20 Y FAC Dominan t Species Indicator Status 10 10 35 105 0 2.47 95 235 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 5 N FAC Persicaria pensylvanica 20 Y FACW (Plot size: 5 Typha latifolia 10 Y OBL Impatiens capensis 10 Y Potentilla norvegica 5 N FAC Trifolium pratense 10 Y FACU Poa pratensis 5 N FACW 5 N FACW 5 N FAC 0 1940 Lakeview Terrace Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size: 30 75 (Plot size: 15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: ---------------------- FACW 40 80 Morphological adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 5 4 10 40 80.00% Y Presence of unknown grass species (15%) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 20 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 07/29/2021 Sampling Point: SP1-1WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave S27 118N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) PEM1C , or hydrology , or hydrology X Midwest Region US Amy Corps of Engineers Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X Sampling Point:SP1-1W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loc** 0 to 6 10YR 2/2 100 clay loam 6 to 12 10Y 5/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M clay loam 20 to 30 10YR 2/1 60 clay Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Soils appear to contain fill. Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):30 24 10YR 5/2 40 *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes 12 to 20 10YR 2/1 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M clay Midwest Region US Army Corps of Engineers Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A) (B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Plantago major Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Taraxacum officinale Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 20 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 07/29/2021 Sampling Point: SP1-1UMN Local relief (concave, convex, none): linear S27 118N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) none , or hydrology , or hydrology 1940 Lakeview Terrace Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size: 30 40 (Plot size: 15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: ---------------------- FACU 0 0 Morphological adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 3 1 35 140 33.33% N 0 Trifolium pratense 5 N 5 N FAC Glechoma hederacea 15 Y FACU (Plot size: 5 Digitaria ischaemum 10 Y FACU 0 3.58 60 215 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 5 N FACU 0 0 25 75 Absolute % Cover30 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions were drier than normal based on the gridded database method and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. Vegetation had been mowed, therefore vegetation is disturbed and "normal circumstances" are not present. Soils are mapped as Urban land - Udorthents and appeared to contain fill, therefore soils are disturbed. N Acer negundo 20 Y FAC Dominan t Species Indicator Status X X N N VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? No N Urban land - Udorthents (non-hydric)NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat: Long:---------------Datum:----------------- Investigator(s): Adam Cameron, Holly Francart Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner: Barbara Jumppanen State: hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: Midwest Region US Amy Corps of Engineers Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) 16 to 24 10YR 6/2 40 10YR 4/6 40 C M sandy clay loam No saturation or free water observed to a depth of 24" *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) soils appear to contain fill Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) NHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 10YR 2/1 20 sandy clay loam 6 to 16 10YR 6/2 60 10YR 4/6 40 C M sandy clay loam 0 to 6 10YR 3/3 100 loam Sampling Point:SP1-1U Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loc** Midwest Region US Army Corps of Engineers 1940 Lakeview Terrace Site Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX C Precipitation Data 8/10/2021 Precipitation Documentation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Minnesota State Climatology Office State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources home | current conditions | journal | past data | summaries | agriculture | other sites | about us Precipitation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Hennepin township number: 118N township name: Medina range number: 23W nearest community: Long Lake section number: 27 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Thursday, July 29, 2021 Score using 1981-2010 normal period values are in inches A 'R' following a monthly total indicates a provisional value derived from radar-based estimates. first prior month: July 2021 second prior month: June 2021 third prior month: May 2021 estimated precipitation total for this location: 1.43R 1.34R 3.47R there is a 30% chance this location will have less than: 2.54 3.34 2.52 there is a 30% chance this location will have more than: 4.25 5.36 4.08 type of month: dry normal wet dry dry normal monthly score 3 * 1 = 3 2 * 1 = 2 1 * 2 = 2 multi-month score: 6 to 9 (dry) 10 to 14 (normal) 15 to 18 (wet) 7 (dry) Other Resources: retrieve daily precipitation data view radar-based precipitation estimates view weekly precipitation maps Evaluating Antecedent Precipitation Conditions (BWSR) https://climateapps.dnr.state.mn.us/gridded_data/precip/wetland/worksheet.asp?passXutm83=454778&passYutm83=4983129&passcounty=Hennepin… 1/1 1940 Lakeview Terrace Site, Orono MN: Precipitation Summary Source: Minnesota Climatology Working Group Monthly Totals: 2021 latitude: 45.00017 longitude: 93.57377 Target: T118 R23 S27 mon year cc tttN rrW ss nnnn oooooooo pre (inches) Jan 2021 27 117N 24W 27 BYRG .44 Feb 2021 27 117N 24W 27 BYRG .33 Mar 2021 27 117N 24W 27 BYRG 1.61 Apr 2021 27 119N 22W 31 BYRG 2.38 May 2021 27 119N 22W 31 BYRG 3.65 Jun 2021 27 119N 22W 31 BYRG 1.00 Jul 2021 27 117N 23W 31 BYRG 1.43 May/June/July Daily Records Date Precip. May 1, 2021 0 May 2, 2021 0 May 3, 2021 .01 May 4, 2021 0 May 5, 2021 0 May 6, 2021 .03 May 7, 2021 T May 8, 2021 0 May 9, 2021 0 May 10, 2021 0 May 11, 2021 0 May 12, 2021 0 May 13, 2021 0 May 14, 2021 0 May 15, 2021 .01 May 16, 2021 0 May 17, 2021 0 May 18, 2021 0 May 19, 2021 - May 20, 2021 - May 21, 2021 2.38 May 22, 2021 0 May 23, 2021 0 May 24, 2021 0 May 25, 2021 .09 May 26, 2021 0 May 27, 2021 .40 May 28, 2021 .73 May 29, 2021 T May 30, 2021 0 May 31, 2021 0 1981-2010 Summary Statistics Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec WARM ANN WAT 30% 0.46 0.40 1.18 1.93 2.52 3.34 2.54 2.89 2.29 1.28 1.07 0.61 16.19 26.84 26.06 70% 1.05 0.87 1.94 2.84 4.08 5.36 4.25 4.68 3.96 3.36 1.99 1.42 21.07 33.26 33.11 mean 0.80 0.77 1.71 2.57 3.43 4.38 3.95 4.09 3.39 2.39 1.66 1.14 19.24 30.28 30.11 Date Precip. Jun 1, 2021 0 Jun 2, 2021 0 Jun 3, 2021 .02 Jun 4, 2021 0 Jun 5, 2021 0 Jun 6, 2021 0 Jun 7, 2021 0 Jun 8, 2021 0 Jun 9, 2021 m Jun 10, 2021 m Jun 11, 2021 0 Jun 12, 2021 0 Jun 13, 2021 0 Jun 14, 2021 0 Jun 15, 2021 0 Jun 16, 2021 0 Jun 17, 2021 0 Jun 18, 2021 0 Jun 19, 2021 0 Jun 20, 2021 .01 Jun 21, 2021 .28 Jun 22, 2021 0 Jun 23, 2021 0 Jun 24, 2021 .06 Jun 25, 2021 0 Jun 26, 2021 0 Jun 27, 2021 .15 Jun 28, 2021 .05 Jun 29, 2021 .25 Jun 30, 2021 .18 Date Precip. Jul 1, 2021 0 Jul 2, 2021 0 Jul 3, 2021 0 Jul 4, 2021 0 Jul 5, 2021 0 Jul 6, 2021 .42 Jul 7, 2021 0 Jul 8, 2021 0 Jul 9, 2021 0 Jul 10, 2021 0 Jul 11, 2021 0 Jul 12, 2021 0 Jul 13, 2021 0 Jul 14, 2021 .68 Jul 15, 2021 0 Jul 16, 2021 0 Jul 17, 2021 0 Jul 18, 2021 0 Jul 19, 2021 0 Jul 20, 2021 0 Jul 21, 2021 0 Jul 22, 2021 .06 Jul 23, 2021 .05 Jul 24, 2021 0 Jul 25, 2021 .03 Jul 26, 2021 0 Jul 27, 2021 .19 Jul 28, 2021 0 Jul 29, 2021 0 Site Visit Jul 30, 2021 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 5/11/21 5/26/21 6/10/21 6/25/21 7/10/21 7/25/21 Da i l y a n d m o n t h l y t o t a l p r e c i p i t a t i o n ( i n c h e s ) monthly precip daily precip 30d rolling total 30 -day rolling total normal precip range Site Visit Climate Conditions 1940 Lakeview Terrace, Orono MN Site Visit July 29, 2021 1940 Lakeview Terrace Site Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX D Photos Photo 1 Photo 2