The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04/28/2022 Septic Compliance NON COMPLIANTCONTROL AGENCY MINNESOTA POLLUTION Compliance inspection report form 520 Lafayette Road North Existing Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SETS) St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 Doc Type: Compliance and Enforcement Instructions: Inspection results based on Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) requirements and attached supporting documentation — additional local requirements may also apply. Further information can be found here: ii vtn<< i a; t{PYe._rnl1.L)s/sirs/deffaL.ilt/files/wc; w ris 4�:3la. f7tit. i 1„ , f:. .. _ .,- - .niv E� f 15k m'1 ��1ud2 Property information Local trackin number: Parcel ID# or Sec/Twp/Range: Local regulatory authority: City of Orono Property address: 591 North Stream Road, Orono - Owner/representative. Sue Pearce-- Brief system description: 2- 1000 gallon septic tanks & rock trench drainfield Owner's phone: 952-473-2735 System status System status on date (mm/dd/yyyy): 4-28-2022 El Compliant Compliant — Certificate of compliance (Valid for 3 years from report date unless evidence of an imminent threat to public health or safety requiring removal and abatement under section 145A.04, subdivision 8 is discovered or a shorter time frame exists in Local Ordinance.) *Note: Compliance indicates conformance with Minn. R. 7080.1500 as of system status date above and does not guarantee future performance. ® Noncompliant — Notice of noncompliance An imminent threat to public health and safety (ITPHS) must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance or under section 145A.04 subdivision 8. Systems failing to protect ground water must be upgraded, replaced, or use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance. Reason(s) for noncompliance (check all applicable) ❑ Impact on public health (Compliance component #1) — Imminent threat to public health and safety ❑ Tank integrity (Compliance component #2) — Failing to protect groundwater ❑ Other Compliance Conditions (Compliance component #3) — Imminent threat to public health and safety ❑ Other Compliance Conditions (Compliance component #3) — Failing to protect groundwater ❑ System not abandoned according to Minn. R. 7080.2500 (Compliance component #3) — Failing to protect groundwater ® Soil separation (Compliance component #5) — Failing to protect groundwater ❑ Operating permit/monitoring plan requirements (Compliance component #4) — Noncompliant - local ordinance applies Comments or recommendations There is some degredation around the pipes in the 2"d tank from Hydrogen Sulfide damage, it is not exposing any rebar so it doesn't cause the tanks to fail compliance Certification I hereby certify that all the necessary information has been gathered to determine the compliance status of this system. No determination of future system performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system construction, possible abuse of the system, inadequate maintenance, or future water usage. By typing my name below, I certify the above statements to be true and correct, to the best of my knowledge, and that this infom7ation can be used for the purpose of processing this form. Business name: Sewer ices4n6 _ Certification number: C1659 Inspector signature: Thies ? - �V _ _ License number: 2502 s documents as been electronically signed) — — — - — Phone 952 8.73_-3.292 Necessary or locally required supporting �a�, �� k a 11 ® Soil observation logs ® Locally required forms ❑ Other information (list): https://www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 wq-wwists4-31b • 1/11/21 800-657-3864 ® Tank Integrity Assessment Use your preferred relay service ❑ Operating Permit Available in alternative formats Page 1 of 4 1. Impact on public health — Compliance component #1 of 5 Compliance criteria: ._._.......... System discharges sewage to the ground surface System discharges sewage to drain :[]Yes, ®No tile or surface waters. System causes sewage backup into ❑ Yes ® No dwelling or establishment. 1"v"31,,> l .,.? x d o.'ti. t _... _-. , Describe verification methods and results: Searched for surface outlet or ground discharge Checked for back-up 2. Tank integrity — Compliance component #2 of 5 Compliance criteria: System consists of a seepage pit, cesspool, drywell, leaching pit, or other1 1-11 pit? Sewage tank(s) leak below their designed operating depth? ❑ Yes, ® No ❑ Yes ® No Ifyes, which sewage tanks) leaks: { ... t.,.. r,, . ab..,,( Describe verification methods and results: Pumped & Inspected Attached supporting documentation: ❑ Other: ® Not applicable Attached supporting documentation: ® Pumped at time of inspection Name of maintenance business: Sewer _Services License number of maintenance business: 2_502_ _ Date of maintenance: 4/28/2022 ❑ Existing tank integrity assessment (Attach) Date of maintenance (mm/dd/ _____. YYYY) (must hp �nith—-- (See form instructions to ensure assessment complies with Minn. R. 7082.0700 subp. 4 8 (9)) ❑ Tank is Noncompliant (pumping not necessary — explain below) ❑ Other: ttps://www.pca.state.mn.us _ 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 -- Use your preferred relay service Available in alternative formats wq-wwrsts4-316 1/11/21 Page 2 of 4 3. Other compliance conditions — Compliance component #3 of 5 3a. Maintenance hole covers appear to be structurally unsound (damaged, cracked, etc.), or unsecured? ❑ Yes ° ® No ❑ Unknown 3b. Other issues (electrical hazards, etc.) to immediately and adversely impact public health or safety? ❑ Yes` ® No ❑ Unknown x ys,,p-_,p. x., 0 LiWX , 3c. System is non -protective of ground water for other conditions as determined by inspector? 3d. System not abandoned in accordance with Minn. R. 7080.2500? t.n =f;t .f',`i j..>;�t fis.c x Describe verification methods and results: Inspected Attached supporting documentation: ® Not applicable ❑ ❑ Yes' ® No ❑ Yes ® No 4. Operating permit and nitrogen BMP* — Compliance component #4 of 5 p ®Not applicable Is the system operated under an Operating Permit? ❑ Yes Fl No If "yes", A below is required Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP specified in the system design? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes", B below is required BMP = Best Management Practice(s) specified in the system design If the answer to both questions is "no". this section does not need to be completed. Compliance criteria: a. Have the operating permit requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. Is the required nitrogen BMP in place and properly functioning? ❑ Yes ❑ No F Irl an,s,, lv-verr Describe verification methods and results: Attached supporting documentation: ❑ Operating permit (Attach) ❑ https://www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 se your preferred relay -service Available in alternative formats wq-wwrsYs4-316 1/11/21• Page 3 of 4 5. Soil separation — Compliance component #5 of 5 Date of installation 9/23/1987 ❑ Unknown (mm/dd/yyyy) Shoreland/Wellhead protection/Food beverage lodging? Compliance criteria (select one): ® Yes ❑ No Attached supporting documentation: 5a. For systems built prior to April 1, 1996, ❑ Yes ❑ No" and not located in Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Area or not serving a food, beverage or lodging establishment: Drainfield has at least a two -foot vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock. 5b. Non-performance systems built April 1, 1996, or later or for non-performance systems located in Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Areas or serving a food, beverage, or lodging establishment: Drainfield has a three-foot vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock." ® Soil observation logs completed for the report (Attach) ❑ Two previous verifications of required vertical separation (Attach) ❑ Not applicable (No soil treatment area) El ❑ Yes ®No' Indicate depths or elevations 5c. "Experimental, "Other", or "Performance" i ❑ Yes systems built under pre -2008 Rules; Type IV or V systems built under 2008 Rules 7080. 2350 or 7080.2400 (Advanced Inspector License required) Drainfield meets the designed vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock. Describe verification methods and results: Boring 1-14" 10yr 3/2 Loam 15-30" 10yr 4/4 Clay Loam Redox 24" A. Bottom of distribution media 36" B. Periodically saturated soil/bedrock 24" C. System separ D. Required com none *May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by Local Ordinance. Upgrade requirements: (Minn. Stat. § 115.55) An imminent threat to public health and safety (ITPHS) must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance. If the system is failing to protect ground water, the system must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance. If an existing system is not failing as defined in law, and has at least two feet of design soil separation, then the system need not be upgraded, repaired, replaced, or its use discontinued, notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more strict. This provision does not apply to systems in shoreland areas, Wellhead Protection Areas, or those used in connection with food, beverage, and lodging establishments as defined in law. https://www.pca-state.mn,us 651-296-6300- - —`— 00-657-3864 wq-wwrsts4-31b 1/11/21 Use your preferred relay service Available in alternative formats Page 4 of 4 � . . . 2>. � , �«� �� ®. . .d\� « y � � z�� « w . . \ �� ` ^�� ^�� ^ ��