Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-21-2022 Planning Commission Packet AZ.Df VO Agenda Planning Commission Meeting Monday, March 21,2022, 6:00 P.M. ti*"`: Orono Council Chambers,2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 l�/CFSH0'1" 952-249-4600/www.ci.orono.mn.us Audience Members: Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available on the City website (www.ci.orono.mn.us) in Agendas Minutes & Videos and in the Public Packet—located in the lobby near the entrance. Applicants will be asked to move to the lectern to answer questions after staff presents the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda,they will be scheduled for an upcoming City Council meeting. A quorum of the City Council may be in attendance of a Planning Commission meeting to hear comments made, though no action or deliberation of the Council will occur. Council Representative: Richard Crosby Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Agenda Approval of Minutes: February 22, 2022 Public Hearings: 1. LA22-000008 Jon Byington o/b/o Travis Dejong, 1270 Wildhurst Trail, Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Staff: Laura Oakden) 2. LA22-000013 JALIN Design, LLC—Jeff Lindgren, 2726 Caroline Avenue,Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Staff: Melanie Curtis) Other Business: 3. PC Liaison to City Council Schedule 4. Update on March 14, 2022 City Council meeting Adjourn Planning Commission Liaison to Monday, April 11, 2022 City Council meeting: Bob Erickson Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us—follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION February 22,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Chair Scott Kirchner,Commissioners Chris Bollis,Bob Erickson,Dennis Libby, and Jon Ressler(arrived at 6:02);Commissioners Matt Gettman and Mark McCutcheon were absent.Representing Staff were Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart,City Planner Melanie Curtis,and City Planner Laura Oakden. Chair Kirchner called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Libby moved,Bollis seconded,to approve the Agenda.VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 0. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 18,2022. Bollis moved,Ressler seconded,to approve the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission meeting of January 18,2022.VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENT PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. LA21-000076 YARDSCAPES,INC.-LINCOLN DANFORTH, 1720 BOHNS POINT ROAD, REQUESTS HARDCOVER AND 75-FOOT LAKEYARD SETBACK VARIANCES TO ALLOW THE RECONSTRUCTION OF A RETAINING WALL. Staff presented a summary packet of information.Ms. Oakden stated the Applicant is proposing to reconstruct failing retaining walls within the 75' lake yard setback with some expansion to the footprint. The property abuts Lake Minnetonka with a large slope along the shoreline;the existing retaining walls are made of concrete and the new proposed walls will be boulders to match the neighboring walls.Ms. Oakden said most of the walls will following the same footprint as the existing walls with some slight variations.The Applicant is hoping to proactively prevent any further erosion and stabilize the area. Staff finds there to be practical difficulties for allowing the Applicant to rebuild and install new retaining walls within the lake yard. The retaining walls would support and protect the slope. Staff would recommend adding additional screening of the walls to preserve a natural,vegetated view from the lake.Ms. Oakden noted one letter of support was received. Chair Kirchner opened the public hearing at 6:05 p.m. Melissa Santrach, 1700 Bohns Point Road, lives in the house right next door and sent the letter. She urged the Commissioners to allow this as they can see the condition of the existing concrete wall. Chair Kirchner closed the public hearing at 6:06 p.m. Ressler is familiar with this property and it seems manageable,prevents erosion,and he is in support of Staffs recommendation. Page 1 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION February 22,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. Ressler moved,Bollis seconded,to approve LA21-000076, 1720 Bohns Point Road,Variances. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. 2. LA22-000001 TIM& LESLIE OARE AND JOHN& MICHELE ABBOTT,2941 CASCO POINT ROAD AND 2967 CASCO POINT ROAD,REQUEST HARDCOVER VARIANCES,A LOT AREA VARIANCE FOR A GUEST HOUSE,AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A GUEST HOUSE AS PART OF A BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT AND LOT COMBINATION OF THE PROPERTY AT 2965 CASCO POINT ROAD. Tim and Leslie Oare,and John and Michele Abbott,Applicants,were present. Staff presented a summary packet of information.Ms.Curtis stated the Abbotts and the Oares purchased 2965 Casco Point Road(referred to in the Staff report as the Swenson property).The Abbotts have lived at 2941 Casco Point Road for a number of years;the Oares recently built a new home at 2967 Casco Point Road. They hope to split the property and combine each portion with their lots.An administrative boundary line adjustment(officially called a Subdivision Exception)can be completed by Staff and recorded by the owner to combine and move the lot lines if no new non-conformities are created or an existing non-conformity is not increased.Variances for hardcover for both lots are requested,a lot area variance, and a conditional use permit(CUP)supporting a guest house for the Oare property are requested.The Applicants propose a net decrease in hardcover of 22 square feet.However,the hardcover for the parcel to be owned by the Abbotts will increase from 22.96 to 27.5%,and the Oare property hardcover square footage increases and will exceed 25%.The currently non-conforming-sized Oare property will become conforming within the district with respect to lot area and lot width.The Abbott property will conform to lot area while lot width will remain the same and will acquire the detached garage;the Oares will acquire the Swenson home and wish to maintain the full functionality of the existing home to serve as a guest house.A guest house use in the LR-1C district requires two times the district minimum acreage. In this case,a minimum lot area of 1-acre is required for a guest house use in addition to a CUP.The resulting lot area for the Oare property is proposed to be 0.73 acre.They are also requesting a lot area variance from the guest house acreage requirement as part of this application.They have applied for the Subdivision Exception application(#LA21-000078)with the hope that the requested variances will be granted and the lot can be split between the two parties.Ms.Curtis showed the proposed hardcover removals on screen,noting the City Engineer had comments regarding the new driveway to serve the guest house and indicated that City Code would only allow one curb cut per property so the second driveway cannot be approved by Staff. Comments from neighbors are included.Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds that the elimination of a non-conforming lot is a positive improvement from an average lakeshore setback perspective,as well as the overall reduction of hardcover between the 3 properties.The hardcover variance requested may be supported by practical difficulty as an improvement from the existing condition,however the new driveway hardcover proposed(on the Oare lot)is not supported,nor is it permitted by code. Staff does not find practical difficulties exist which support the requested lot area variance to permit a guest house use. Staff recommends denial of the lot area variance for the guest house use and denial of the CUP for the guest house.The Oares are permitted to maintain plumbing facilities in the existing house with a restrictive covenant addressing the use as an accessory building with full plumbing facilities.As the building is currently a fully appointed home, Staff recommends the Commission discuss whether or not modifications to the existing home are appropriate under this scenario.Regarding the requested hardcover variances,staff recommends denial of the hardcover variances for the Oare property.The Oares should consider making the following changes: 1.Elimination of the proposed driveway/parking area on the Oare property; Page 2 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION February 22,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. 2.Removal of the existing lakeside"Swenson"deck on the Oare property; and 3.Removal of at least 340 square feet of existing patio hardcover on the lakeside of the "Swenson"house. Staff recommends approval of some level of hardcover variance for the Abbott property,however encourages removal of any hardcover that exceeds the minimum necessary to serve the property. John Abbott,2941 Casco Point Road,noted the Oare parcel is very narrow with 20 feet of lakeshore.The parcel was associated with the Oare property a long time ago and at some point the decision was made to split that guest house off and make it into a separate parcel.He noted a 20 foot lakeshore is very narrow to keep a boat and shared historical disputes that resulted in a variance granted to allow a dock on the property.The Swensons did not abide by that but it was tolerated by neighbors. When the Abbots and Oares found that the property was for sale,they realized it was a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to remedy the situation of a congested area.The Applicants would like to work with the City to accommodate the request to split the parcel.He shared they are not doing anything to change the property but divide it up, remove the dock, and remove hardcover. Leslie Dennis Oare,2967 Casco Point Road,supports what Mr.Abbott just said.They felt it was an opportunity to eliminate a non-conforming property with an inconsistent lakeshore setback and eliminate the dock and the 50-page dock permit with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. She apologized if parking spots were an issue noting they thought it was a good opportunity to provide more parking but they would not be needed. She clarified the hardcover on the new parcel would drop,and as Mr.Abbott mentioned, the guest house was originally part of her property and they would also eliminate a large section of sidewalk between the garage and existing house.The patio is an extension of the house with a built-in firepit and stamped concrete and would be very difficult to remove. The Applicants feel they are making positive changes by removing the non-conformity and hope they can move forward. Chair Kirchner opened the public hearing at 6:28 p.m. Chair Kirchner closed the public hearing at 6:28 p.m. Chair Kirchner can support the spirit of what is trying to be accomplished,however they would also be eliminating a non-conforming lot to then allow for a guest house on a non-conforming lot that does not meet area requirements. Bollis thinks it is a unique opportunity to go back in time and make this how it should have been before it was split off. Regarding the guest house,he noted the one acre rule and clarified that the house could stay but would not be labeled or allowed to be a guest house. Ms. Curtis replied it would not be allowed to be a dwelling but would be like any other accessory building such as a pool house,office, detached garage,or workout room. The one acre rule comes from the desire to not increase the density of the district. Bollis stated one could argue that this decreases the density because they would be eliminating it as a private residence. Ms. Curtis shared that the density stays the same. Page 3 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION February 22,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. Bollis stated he could get behind a guest house on less than one acre, and said it would be nice to create some off street parking without an additional curb cut.In general he likes the spirit of the application. Ressler agrees they are improving the position and asked if they tore it down to rebuild as a carriage house,this would be conforming as an accessory building. Ms. Curtis replied in the affirmative. Ressler agrees with Staff that the lakeside deck and walkway close to the shoreline be removed. He appreciates the Applicant removing the curb cut and agrees with Bollis on the parking and not allowing it to spill out onto the street.He noted even though the stamped concrete is beautiful to see,if the Applicant could remove that and propose an area that does not need a new curb cut to allow for additional parking they could see if there is support from the City on that.Ressler could support hardcover for parking if it did not require additional curb cuts. He agrees with Staff's decision and would be supportive for most of this but not as it is applied.He thinks it would get too messy to do an amended vote to approve rather than to recommend denial as submitted with the feedback he has provided.He noted that for the consideration of the City Council. Erickson thinks it is admirable that the effort has been made to acquire an additional non-conforming property and re-divide it and that is commendable. Unfortunately,it creates some other problems such as hardcover.It leaves him in a bit of a quandary. Libby noted it is complicated.He finds some contradictions with the idea that another curb cut could facilitate additional parking but does not align with Staff recommendations.He thinks the additional conditions in paragraph number 7 are all prudent and should follow suit if the Applicant was to accomplish, in spirit,what they are trying to do.Libby stated it is a catch-22 in a way because it does not meet Code yet the recommendation of Staff does not support having a second curb cut so they are at an impasse. He cannot add anything constructive as an additional recommendation and thinks they need to see how the City Council looks at this. Chair Kirchner does not support the existing house being used as a guest house.They have heard statements about congestion issues and leaving an additional dwelling unit does not alleviate that congestion. Ressler moved,Libby seconded,to deny LA22-000001 Tim & Leslie Oare and John& Michele Abbott,2941 Casco Point Road and 2967 Casco Point Road,Hardcover Variances,a Lot Area Variance for a Guest House,and a Conditional Use Permit for a Guest House as Part of a Boundary Line Adjustment and Lot Combination of the Property at 2965 Casco Point Road. Ms. Oare said Casco Point Road does not have curbs and asked what the definition of a curb cut is. Ms. Curtis replied it is a driveway access. Ms. Oare clarified if a relative came to visit in the summer,they could not stay in the house. Chair Kirchner replied not without a conditional use permit. Page 4 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION February 22,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. Mr.Abbott stated that home has existed as a home for a very long time and there is not a new guest home being created here,rather they are only trying to maintain what is there in a much-improved situation than existed before. It becomes challenging because they want to see it improved and if someone else had bought it, it could have been a rental house.The use of the home will be far, far,far less than it ever could have been in its prior history.He clarified they are asking for something less than what exists today as part of the improvement. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. 3. LA22-000005 CHARLES WELF,2590 WATERTOWN ROAD,REQUESTS A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A HOME ADDITION. Staff presented a summary packet of information.Ms.Oakden stated the Applicant is requesting a 46 foot front yard setback where a 50 foot setback is required.The property consists of roughly 3.83 acres with a house and 3 out-buildings. The Applicant is proposing to demo the existing detached garage on the north side of the home and build a new addition to the south side of the home. The proposed addition will be one story and include storage, a 3 stall garage and a mudroom. The current detached garage is located to the rear of the home and is in close proximity to the septic infrastructure.The Applicant is proposing to place the new garage addition along the front of the home 46 feet from the front property line where 50 feet is required. The property is over 2 acres in size and exempt from structural and hardcover limitations. The Applicant designed the addition to protect the existing trees located along the front of the house. The addition will be screened from the road with the existing landscaping located along Watertown Road. The Applicant has identified the existing conditions of the current home location, location of the septic system, and the existing established trees as practical difficulties supporting the variance. Staff finds there is inherent difficulty with the existing locations of the home,utilities and trees on the property limiting the buildable space. However,the Applicant has alternatives for expansion which could conform to the setbacks.To date no public comments have been received. While the variance is relatively modest,the practical difficulty standards have not been proven so Staff cannot support the application. Chad Schlawin,9391 Partridge Road,Minnetrista,noted the Applicants are his in-laws and are out of town tonight, so he is representing them. The Applicants have gone through several iterations of layouts and plans without affecting the septic system and according to the architect this is the prime location for an addition. Chair Kirchner opened the public hearing at 6:50 p.m. Chair Kirchner closed the public hearing at 6:50 p.m. Chair Kirchner agrees with Staff that although it appears to be a relatively minor variance, other options exist for the addition to be done without exceeding the 50 foot setback. Ressler agrees and said approving this would set a precedent for others, similar to the last application.He is hopeful that the Applicant can revise their plans to be within the setback requirements and still make it useful for them. Erickson noted the Applicant did some positive things in protecting the immature trees on the east and moving structures away from the septic system to the south. He thinks overall it is an improvement to the Page 5 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION February 22,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. property to have an attached garage.He agrees with the Commissioners in observing that there are options which could fit within the setbacks. Libby agrees with Erickson,noting with 4 feet in the variance he thinks other options should be looked at. Erickson moved,Bollis seconded,to deny LA22-000005,2590 Watertown Road,Variance for a Home Addition.VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. 4. LA22-000007 ALMA HOMES,LLC,65 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH,REQUESTS LOT AREA AND LOT WIDTH VARIANCES,SIDE YARD SETBACK AND FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCES IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A NEW HOME. Staff presented a summary packet of information. Ms. Curtis stated the Applicant is requesting approval of lot area, lot width,side yard setback,and front setback variances in order to build a new home on the property.The property is situated within the RR-1A zoning district where 5.0 acres in area is required. The property is substandard with respect to area and width.The Applicant is proposing to redevelop the property with a new home in a similar location as the existing home.They are requesting setback variances due to the site's topography,applied setbacks, and the existing shared driveway configuration. They are proposing a home with an attached garage and a rear deck within the front yard setback. The two accessory buildings behind the home are proposed to remain. Ms. Curtis stated the required front setback results in pushing the home further back into the sloped area of the property and closer to the wetland which is not conducive to the type of soils that will support the home,nor is it consistent with the neighborhood.The existing septic system is proposed to being reused.The Applicant is proposing to situate the home 51.7 feet from the front property line where a 100 foot setback is required and a 46 foot setback currently exists with existing buildings.The home will actually be about 70 feet from the roadway and will conform to the north side yard setback at 62 feet and the setback from the south lot line will be 48.8 feet where 50 is required.Both setbacks will improve the existing condition. Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds there are practical difficulties in the size and width of the property,the sloping topography,and existing conditions supporting variances for a new home. Staff recommends approval. Eric Gronberg, 65 Stubbs Bay Road,has talked to neighbors on each side who have both said they were okay with the proposal.He noted they are trying to make it more conforming. Chair Kirchner opened the public hearing at 6:58 p.m. Chair Kirchner closed the public hearing at 6:58 p.m. Chair Kirchner generally agrees with Staff on this,noting the topography and sloping create some challenges.He can support the application. Bollis asked if this is consistent with 15 Stubbs Bay Road,which the Commission previously approved. Curtis replied it is very consistent,although she does not know if it is exactly the same setback as it was a smaller lot. Ressler is struggling with it,noting it is positioned better than the neighboring property but it seems that it could be more conforming than proposed. Page 6 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION February 22,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. Erickson tends to lean towards Staff's recommendation. The Commissioners asked the builder if it is possible to adjust the south setback a couple of inches to meet the 50 feet. Ethan Kindseth,Alma Homes, noted the challenge in moving the structure further back is getting into soils that are not conducive to carry the structure and there are a lot of mature trees down the slope.They tried to keep as many trees intact as possible and with the wetland boundaries they are restricted on where the existing and proposed septic sites can be located.He clarified they are a bit restricted on usable areas. Bollis struggles with it the more he looks at it.This seems like a tight area with the topography. Ressler thinks there needs to be more demonstrated as to why it must be built where it is proposed. Kirchner agrees. When he heard that the soil was not buildable he assumed that there was engineering soil boring done with a report but that is not the case.He would also like to see further evidence of why it is not possible to move the structure further back. Erickson said in hearing the extreme grades, soil conditions,and septic situation his opinion is that there are significant practical difficulties and he would support the application as presented. Ms. Curtis put the soil map from the wetland delineation on screen,noting she is not a soils professional. She shared that two-thirds of the lot is categorized as predominantly hydric soils and the upland is partially hydric. Bollis clarified seeing the soil map changes his mind and he can get behind the application for the same reasons as Erickson. Libby asked the builder whether this is a candidate for soil amendment, amendment to elevations,or bringing in appropriate soil to be sure this is a solid base for the construction. Mr.Kindseth said part of the challenge is that so much of the building envelope is wetland and it is a tough battle to not impact the wetland.They would also have to clear-cut the slope and tree cover to do it. Mr. Gronberg shared that the neighbor to the south is a little bit closer than that setback. 15 Stubbs Bay came to the Planning Commission and was approved with the same slope and terrain,only without the wetland behind their property.He clarified they are trying to improve some of the setbacks for the neighbor in the front lot. Ressler asked about the setbacks on the south side and if it is possible to move those couple inches. Mr. Gronberg shared there is a culvert on the north side and tree cover;he noted it is the only place they can have any kind of roadway to get a mower into the backyard because of the slope on the other side of the house. Ms. Curtis asked how the septic gets pumped. Page 7 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION February 22,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. Mr.Gronberg shared they put a snake down from the road as they cannot come in and turn around. Ressler clarified that he is in support of this and thinks the City Council would like to see a demonstration of the tree cover and a better understanding of the practical difficulties. Erickson moved,Libby seconded,to approve LA22-000007,65 Stubbs Bay Road North,Lot Area and Lot Width Variances,Side Yard Setback and Front Yard Setback Variances.VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. SKETCH PLAN PRESENTATION 5. LA22-000002 JIM HILLIER, 1245 ARBOR STREET, SUBDIVISION,SKETCH PLAN. Staff presented a summary packet of information.Mr.Barnhart shared the Applicant is requesting sketch plan review on a proposed subdivision that would subdivide a 0.634 acre parcel into two equal lots.The property is in a two acre zone and each lot is proposed at .14 acre with sanitary sewer and served by a well. Staff does not support the subdivision as proposed primarily because it is inconsistent with zoning ordinance which requires a two acre minimum lot size and 200 feet of frontage and neither lots meet those requirements. The only setback met is the front at 50 feet,the side yard, side street,and rear yard setbacks are non-conforming based on the proposed house pad. Staff is looking for feedback tonight and there is no public hearing. Jim Hillier, 1224 Briar Street,is looking to take what was historically four platted lots,was divided into two parcels, and was then combined into one.They are looking to put it back to the two parcels with two separated PIDs. The history of the neighborhood was 50 feet by 140 foot platted lots, so 80%of the lots in the neighborhood are between 7,000-11,000 square feet.These lots would be roughly 14,000 square feet. In looking at the neighborhood there is a post office, school, art center,and in Mr.Hillier's perspective it was not designed to be two acre urban estates.To keep it as a larger parcel one would want to put a larger home on it and he does not want to do that,noting he bought the lot next door and built a new home where there was once a dilapidated home.He noted they would like to do the same thing with these two parcels to improve the neighborhood and meet some goals of the Comprehensive Plan which is to create affordable housing,and upgrade older neighborhoods with empty lots. Kirchner understands the overall thought process based on neighboring homes.However he does not think it is appropriate or productive for the Planning Commission to support this as it goes against the Comp Plan and current zoning districts. Bollis asked if this goes against the Comp Plan. Barnhart replied no.The zoning ordinance is consistent with the Comp Plan and the Comp Plan guides the City for large lots. There are certain pockets within the community that have not developed under that goal. In 2018 discussions and review of the Comp Plan this neighborhood was specifically talked about and the potential for changing the land-use for it because of the development pattern.The City Council at that time said no,the goal is larger lots in this area as well,and they elected not to increase density in the area. Ressler thinks the Applicant makes a good point regarding density but the time to have that discussion is when the Comp Plan is updated. He noted they have seen the same thing with the Casco Point area Page 8 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION February 22,2022 6:00 o'clock p.m. zoning. The Planning Commission does not have the jurisdiction to approve because it is not a sub- dividable lot. Libby shared that these kinds of changes become moot because it is really difficult to approve a sub division where there is already a non-conformity.He thinks it will be an uphill climb for the Applicant. Erickson cannot support this sub division and agrees with Ressler that anything like this should be preceded by a discussion of the Comp Plan. UPDATE ON FEBRUARY 14,2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Barnhart shared that the two items the Planning Commission discussed in January were a CUP for a permanent dock and the text amendment related to park dedication,both of which the City Council approved on the Consent Agenda. The CUP at Summit Beach did not go forward because the Planning Commission tabled it. ADJOURNMENT Libby moved,Bollis seconded,to adjourn the Planning Commission Meeting.VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. The Orono Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 7:39 p.m. ATTEST: '.j 0117 =filet -icier, air !Lt �tf� Page 9 of 9 Date Application Received:01/19/2022 Date Application Considered as Complete:02/25/2022 "QOO jO 60-Day Review Period Expires: 04/26/2022 t v To: Chair Kirchner and Planning Commission Members y Adam Edwards, City Administrator �&ESHO� From: Laura Oakden, LLO Date: March 21, 2022 Subject: LA22-000008,Jon Byington o/b/o Travis Dejong, 1270 Wildhurst Trail,Variance, Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an Average Lakeshore Setback (ALS) variance to permit the addition and deck improvements to the house to be lakeward of ALS. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the variance as proposed. Background The existing principle home on the property is nonconforming to the average lakeshore setback. The applicant is requesting to build a basement level addition with a deck above with along the • south side of the home with a fully enclosed storage area under the deck connected to the basement of the home. The proposed deck will be the same height as the existing deck so the existing home will maintain the same defined height. The project is proposed to be lakeward of the average lakeshore setback. All other city codes are met with the project. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information:The applicant has identified the current location of the home and the grades as practical difficulties. The location of the northern neighbor's home creates an extreme ALS across the subject property as another practical difficulty supporting the requested variance.Additionally,they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Staff agrees with the applicant's arguments for practical difficulty due to the extreme setback on the northern neighboring home which limits a viable building envelope for the property and the new proposed addition and deck will not create any new view obstructions for the neighbors. Staff supports the variance request. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-330--Setbacks: DISTRICT LR-1B Required Existing Proposed Rear 30' 106' No Change Side (North) 10' 37.7' No Change 411 Side (South) 10' 56.3' 36.9' LA22-000008 March 21,2022 Page 2 of 4 Lakeshore 75' "' 126' "'126' 411 Average Lakeshore Not Met Section 78-330—Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT LR-1B Lot Area Lot Width Required 43,560 s.f. (1 acres) 140' Actual 42,282 s.f. (0.97 acres) 112'@ OHWL 125@ 75' Section 78-1403—Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 42,282 s.f. (0.97 acres) Allowed: 8.456.4 s.f. (20%) Existing: 2,731 s.f. (6.4%) Proposed: 3,174 s.f. (7.5%) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700—Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier Tier 1 42,282 s.f 10,570 s.f. 9,816 s.f. 10,232 s.f. (25%) (23.2%) (24.2 %) • The application did no exclude the existing retaining walls in their calculations. The amended existing hardcover is 9,613 (22.7%)and proposed hardcover is 10,029(23.7%) • Applicable Regulations: Section 78-1279 (6) Average lakeshore setback. No principal or accessory building shall be located closer to the Ordinary High Water Line (OHWL)than the average distance from the shoreline of existing principal buildings on adjacent lots;This does not apply to patios and other accessory structures less than 42 inches above existing grade, and/or stairways, lifts, landings, lockboxes,flagpoles and pump houses. Further,the average lakeshore setback shall apply only to classified lakes and shall not apply to tributaries.The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the principal buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. The average lakeshore setback line is roughly 150'-185'back from the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka. The existing home is located lakeward of the ALS, 126'feet from OHWL. The proposed addition is connected to the existing home and is proposed to maintain the same lake setback at 126'from OHWL and creating a new encroachment. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique • LA22-000008 March 21,2022 Page 3 of 4 • to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14,when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The intent of the average lake shore setback is to preserve neighboring properties'views of the lake. The proposed encroachment will not impact these views. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan.The proposed use of the lot for residential purposes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, as is the preservation of lake views and Shoreland management. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The placement of the addition is a reasonable location given the intent of the ordinance to preserve views, and manage sensitive environmental concerns. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; • The existing conditions of the existing home on the lot and the extreme average lakeshore setback due to the neighbor to the north are circumstances not created by the landowner and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The encroachment into the ALS will not impact the character of the locality Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, a single family home is an allowed use in the LR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The extreme distance of the average lakeshore setback due to the neighbor to the north is unique to this property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The conditions do not apply to other land and structures in the • district due to the unique ALS for this neighborhood. LA22-000008 March 21,2022 Page 4 of 4 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a 0 substantial property right of the applicant.The applicant states this to be true. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter.The proposed encroachment is not anticipated to impair any health or safety goals of the city. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Per the applicant,granting this proposal is not for convenience. Granting is necessary to limited buildable site a reasonable use and very reasonable and minor improvement. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments To date,the applicant has submitted a letter of acknowledgment from 1284 Wildhurst Trail (southern neighbor)which would be the most impacted by the proposed project, attached as Exhibit F. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter theIII essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the variance as proposed. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Summary and Narrative Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Survey and Ariel Images Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Neighbor Comments Exhibit F. Property Owners List and Map S Letter View PC Exhibit A Land Use Application Summary LA22-000008 •plication Date: 01/19/2022 Address: 1270 Wildhurst TRL Orono, MN 55364 Parcel Number: 0711723310015 Land Use Number: LA22-000008 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: TRAVIS DEJONG Address: 1270 Wildhurst Trail Applicant: Name: Jon Byington Company: Byingtonhomes@gmail.com Address: 905 Maplecrest dr Minnetrista, MN 55364 byingtonhomes@gmail.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Steve V. Ische Associated Contact: • Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Adding onto existing deck with storage underneath Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application ❑ Appeal of Admin Decision ❑ Concept Application D Conditional Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Application D Subdivision Application D Subdivision Exception D Vacation Application ❑ Variance Application ❑ Applicant Signature: + ,+ I • file:///C/Users/loakden/Downloads/Land%20Use%20Application%20Summary%20(15).htm[3/16/2022 2:41:00 PM] Hi There. • Here are the plans for the proposed variance The homeowner wants to add storage on their property near the pool. It will serve as storage for their pool/lake equipment (canoes, paddle boards, life jackets, boat buoys, etc) and also have a bonus deck on top. The storage space will be enclosed with block walls where the dirt is, concrete slab, rubber roof, foundation footings. The project will not bring the deck closer to the lake, only closer to the side lot line. There is plenty of room for the setback on the side of the house. Completing this project will help keep the property clean and help with the appeal of the neighborhood. Julie and Travis (the homeowners) are close friends with the neighbors and the neighbors have told them they do not have any issues with the project being completed. It does not block anyone's view. Thank you for your time. III • Letter View PC Exhibit B PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA22-000008 LA22-000008 'The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: Yes 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: Correct 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: Correct 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: N/A 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1163.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. sponse: N/A . The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: N/A 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: Correct 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. *sponse: Correct 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, file:///C/Users/Ioakden/Downloads/Practical%20Difficulties%20Documentation%20Form%20(13).htm[3/16/2022 2:40:59 PM] Letter View morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: Correct • 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: Correct • file:///C/Users/loakden/Downloads/Practical%20Difficulties%20Documentation%20Form%20(13).htm[3/16/2022 2:40:59 PM] a U f' m .-.d N 13.1 • V O CO E^ m � -Q N 0 )m L11 Z a o c 1��Z .d h X W �E m o rho UN 1� W ka Q v m w CO"-• Q th I% ��--II> a 0_ J •f �( ► i- 1 a Z J t e O cd re i ``ll W to 3 �i U va �, C v aa, " I (XiO • I X 0 Q� L N Is' N I Q c w li V) oL ILO Q v = o � � z LO 0 w o Z a /�� O i 4� o W V. 2 c O 04 � �. O W+ I- o O OOilQ 0.:w“:LLLLLLLLLu-: LL d 4, CO C\I OL 1-L LU J vvvvviviv0 0 vw N". IO 1W W h1F0N0 N N N4...a 2 1 N ^ V L CU L �\ 5• I U t / / LL 0 a/ I j o y 3 R _ *. y 0 8 S 0 h\ Ij 1A/Q) '> bar 1 �c �u 2=vie w t. `�' ��/-;$�:`\N-fy �BY'h IN C Zvi.. .,Q 3� 0 ' �k� Lei ',1,. 2?o it o Wa / \ \� �6 :�N�7�No I Wn000t~9ZR ° 9 z , ; \\ \�\ eo`rN< `�=� \ � \ \� 0 .?. Yi �� t;\ I N w0@ m — \' ',.. la& \ m d \ I O O o ZOO .� \ I \ _`• nLL\ �.. a- 5 O O .,¢Z +e �Y; /, _J, \\. I \ \ 'C Q W c� O ye..8 -,.^ ,ate ( _1 \—� \ \L.Z6\ _--x" Z W E o I\ xo `~l^�_h _\ ,C , `�'` ` 3� �� �\m Oy01y N \ .- I 1)b4. 1/�, '� \ N Vis. N. Ct CCN.-O ;k \ ���V N. 116, -.\\ \ \ \ \ y U y Q \,8 \y ..NL,,..;- ,- . t� �\ zv, a .a\ ti °reg ---• ,„m,= ._Ni't`> \ \ \ tel' ___ — -Awe o4 �'E of 'e984` \\ \ \ ug ' \ -- �' ' -ice 1J. 'z- -- \ \ m --- _/ -.. ,k,.4....t -4. \ 41101/1 / \ " ‘c ' N , h` a _ \ \ / I \7, Ew \ o \ / "\ "aa 4 / / a,', Ru \ S .a m wa ` .z ri -, `. N --i \.. � . ' ?\/ r \ \CN o .�.. C\I °: \ oat X' am m� /N/ NW / \.,1� / \ 3\ \ \ , 1 •\ � G O x \ / • � \ q - / V. \ \ h 2e\ \ .. �\ N -,� \ \ �` / PS 11 m \\ \ i 11 I � O 3 Z o \n�---'P \ �'.,,eeS. N\ / i ' \ I I I 1 0 0 0co °' aZi _------ --------_____\ �---_ \�•,e� 0.4,9,4_ '�` 1 \ \\ 1 I. I 11 0 o 1111 csIN. O C ° w -o O w 447 C6 e ix Et _ O O a e f 4 IF' , . ' l't ' ! : , , , f. ' *4 rci; ',.4)",- . L, ..: . e 40. r yy m Y f h 1° j ' .pts _ # F s �. 1 C iii} -f , ..... f . .1,4 i . ..... ... ...... .. ri' ' .. . , it . . . c • • ` 'k' r ` • . .1 1 ' 4 , q s � �� : �' �` ',.IA, � . 0 ,'� � ,4 4' m�` �'� .. my it '604 , ,, . r .a 4 , 1 ti Asn. .a.. 6; .• 1 .. i 3T33 • . .�• il . ., ;,:,,,,,26._ �.writ r ' 1 . . - 0 • S N . 1 (L) ice' } 4 iiiie (1) 0. ' 0 4- it, ,f ' 4totort , i.,,,.., , ,.. . , . . , a ciii) . . . .. w ,,• Of 0 0 CIEs=Y , .1 F. . -1/.., iniii‘ t \ ,..-^ si ''' 4. ie '''''.1:'' � -tom• . TL 4. z-z X ' :::: .611.P\ '''. 1 ' C te' t I li CD 1 • .. r '+w, ° Via._ +i _ - f' IMIIMININ ID .7.-.. ,_11,... ....?... .,......,-.......„. : __ , .. .,. .s .„,4 i . / ...... . _ ..„,,.. ...e. 1:-JA"''' , CCi CP) � , - r ; i. f INC �p. . "1" ' e-- J , '. ' • 7, : . _ • _. , . _ ,. ,.. . .. t. , §• ._ ..,.. r�yg 1 - ... t - "; , ,*-../......—, • 0 r +. a T- .a 7 v''' a . .) • a yy .. 0 , iPr r*II? ' -4;4"- IT') 'P . • E p - } Si!11 , ... 1/1 .A! A� _ , 1: \ill , , € • ,I 1 6 g 7 o s F .11 ror 01111411: t iiiiirtilliP,7.! / .,,, 40• i .4t,,., it- . , . ._ , ----- -,, 4 .„ ,......:,,;,,_,.. _ ...._ , . 9 . -N ,/ „,... . . ,i. r .. . 4 • „ .r a2 ; 4 ' . y • It 10 III r , ♦ r _ . v... .. y p� , ... •'O•'. !TC!•Y.,.. 1 111' f � ..s. �IY+l •• •K ,....,7...; . .. ''"P.6, , ,i. .. a. -fir ,'4. - ., f-. $ • . ati , i,..."•,1•61. KrZ r 1 .r v , f,'S�iy, T w • - Aj t fi ti t -' 4• •\, / ' ,` ' • '� ..., .. \ 10 ' � i j1' 4 7 t , `r ti* Rl "6 . 14�' �T `a `a`• �+a s 1j 14,.. "1 - , 1 t 41§..., , , . ,,t ....,. ..1:., , 4,1., Iti.::,r7- ".. % ,.Itti s ; + ,)n' - • t. tit •1 mr TTT"'"""NNNNNMMMMM r ,+�' ..Y 'Y,�,' "•4E .. " ..f... �, • 3 \V.'-'' ‘)\)1/4:s.t' '14k V.• '. 4 k r ` .L t .. `�x 0 `'; Y ',NV' to .,+ :•-.,,,-,-. 4''‘..••••t• .SS,•-• N ., ' •\ ti i • iii111 J •e• ; r •I ! • » •, _" ? �� �; , 1.'+w 4011*. 1 lJy� a i ,-4.•-.4"t- 41 ',:'-. s , k •1 * .v{� r — ,•••• • �•j ` f a, 1 r4 • S _^�1 Ilti• f�, '''' , ,: r.. . . ..... <_ 1 ., ,:-. ',., ' t, I • t y, .'y6, dm. -...-: . , , ii; --... , . . .., ....,..,..,:, .....= .2 . •,_ z . , ilk 4 _ .. i i 4t. .a :-:.. ,4,.1 4 Ve.,..'. it e 7 ad a�x�4Y>r . , ,,,,,,.. 40.• .r., ......; : . e ,# - 4'. Jo . a, r ('. si` a yi �T.` ( a � 7xt' _ � 'r { , t ti • r r Tf ,.. , .„• - d$rJ- !. . • Yii.e y ,, , . .. .4, • . pip 2, . 7,,,. „, , . 4,, _,,,,., _, , ...j.,...„.....70 T,.:„In,. ,ititi,.. t,,,,..”,,:.::,....:7:4,1:. .,,.,7 • t ,m, e,'La♦k'•,tl" r� . �•- ?. + J' -Y ms` 1 X -�►' t-1...3 . - F. . ,Y c 1 "7 �. • .F r • t e . ,r, • y - '1 ���hN.hi i". '"S } .: ,/ �i' Ott. a f F <,.�. i' *, r !{ ' +` "a a:�'!'4 ° - ' , -F w'...Y'�. t�. �' j� .+" ,trLys.a ,t abb, — , • J....,4- 'fif a� ' •` • 4: i y a pk` ,,.f r , 111,,arf.A..,,,:.4f:4,'' ' -''''.:Itir' ' 4. • sd Ra � FS • r - l a � a aP a A / if .2;000 '1 ...4Y,. �. f - In�► t T_ �.• k LASS 4 y { •.. /t T SIL �' 'ii' ,ji1. � ' , i a ' .a'• aF 7 go. y la* r '"' ..1.,-b. -- ,. m14.1 .,..AY.".•�/, �--/rRII-•-- 1,•l pria `G 'ati t.'•S i ' y -# . 1 ♦ v 1 fit• �^ t i ,.... b'• s, .j#v I. i ,t� /.,; � ,t F 5; ..` `) , ti » r <. • • r://0, ' ' AO' (i.' 4.4 . <j. 7 4 s•lft 1. fl r ''/ , • ,' , .'" a ••••'X441 ;�4 is..„r � ,t x` _ , 4.'+u ., it vi � n• 00 z 4--, 00, ,„ 1.... „...,... , ,,, ,... G " IJ' e y ,.. ...., 4 tr, t yy r 'fit^ `/1 ,' + ? L..:"w ,, ��F'-0 Y i - ,,,, , - ,,, , , - . , , . ,:.,,„,,,. „ ,,, . .,,, ,v. al , 0 Ili' V a.7aF L ! i j p s ta \� .4 .- i1T 4j1c' 1 -•�y w �+ �. 1 .rte•, Q 1 if- „\( _i ' • ”` t l / • 'I 1 i , �`" ,'‘ r'r r t7 � ISA la IR 07 ni ,.l t + . .1 ' �' "� i k. )1 ,,, ..t,„,_, /..t , ,,1 :$4!,4 4‘.., it. ., • :t.wL..i,.4, j ift, , f ,L.Y. r • } / 1 1 41 ` la • .\:, ,,, , lik , u .. ... . .... cs• ,,. ... .. j 1. :.... { t : d ii : ._:k: . s, . :--11'7,.".,1 ' ''‘'. t's.'":4?::14k#4:...f'-'''...14r4',,.... t C f F Y * Gsr 4014,. i. ,t ♦ '+. • I - _• * 1 �� .l r yam, 4V- it titIto 3 " 0 i r iii„ ,,./ V f .t , iP ♦ n N „1 A O N * t 1 1 I Q i1 i Al a • iti r ar , . . . . .. A $ ,, t.. E 'u V 15 04, A , „: , - '. ', , C ... . , , , ,-, 4410 , . 4 ` T y; " ‘ t ki , € q; ' 41:' t +` liI. I it t 1 y ,� , sl . 1 A T � �a• ,} ! i SS 4 ALLl . "*'H ' i 1+I, ' *�xa•' - ' `�i`-2._ _„ f. ♦ ' ! . _AIL.. 1 ._k_. • c____.t.s _z___, 1 „. 0 0 ..._, 0 D ....,\ ..„a o ( . x o LLI CN1 , 1 U � 1, I I — _ c . -723 •- r M �y._. _ r -y kfl 1 _i _ � _- - I - , ! ,,, / . ... ' =— 1. { f N : - o 6 v G S1eJ t L_ — a t { I 1 . Crrrl .-1 <> -t fit' 4 c s " ,cr% H t i ~ • 0 'TX/IIII////Nffffsm•m•m"..ag/ .-4C+ c•-- . ....2,...-.) . k5 i -••---4 1 1 0 1 ' A - i i 1 1 .,_ --...-. s..... _ 1 ! 4,"• -..--... __ — I i i r i , _____. I . . ___ " 5- ,/ ...- , / , . . ,_•:..1-6". '-:.. . ..3„ J ----,.. -3 • ...1 ' 411 . S , i- I . . : • -- ----<.. , ....., 1 • : _ _. , -— I ....1 e........2,1 I I .. . . i . . , t -›,- • , .1 1 , . C.> --> I I , I. f . -f- ”.—- - i ..., , _ .... . ...., ._ . . . . . ._. • , .._ , —.I- , , i orli 1 1 i: ,,,, — , . . , - i . I - , _ I , • , . . . , . r . , . • •• 1 1 •• i •I t S % • — l '"5'6 C i •s — 1 1 I 1 i 1 f � - y� 1 l I . i ✓c. bn 1 ' 1 • • i i �� I 1 I 4.0)c ..\friirv) ,A)-3\0 ,%1(.11 9+ • \+o 9 rter.! fh n r ----,),\04-&) . r---- { r --I 1 ., . , . .„. , , . , , ,., .. , . . _ . , .. .. , , . .. .. \,, . „. ., , ! \, , , ... ..,., ,, \ , . \ , ....c- . i__ _ .__, k r v ,..,.. Jr..1 • ,-- 6. . _--- - . , t S'ca , -7,-:_i_ ..._._ ,v-..--- _ fr-a ----___ /--- ci.), ?..--- NJ • -6-- . . . . . � | ! � i ' | | � | | ' | ' � | | | | � ' | � | � • | | � | I. / ' PC Exhibit E LA22-000008 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS'ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM 14 I(we) 44 N- 10111 ( {[JET' of Q 134�1[(oit)(�jT- AIL [ rint name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. le;.ACAS a-5.a0a0 Pro.- ' u • Date Property Owner Date If you havea n information that mayassist the Cityin the review of this Land Use Y Application,please submit your comments to the Building&Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS'ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I(we) of [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application,please submit your comments to the Building&Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. • Adjacent Property Owner Form-January 2021 / r PC Exhibit F Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map LA22-000008 Date: 1/19/2022 • Saga Hill Preserve For, r u C fi)1.4111 .c.brill 111111, ,.. .,Op , .41 fi: mil . kvelim, ,irra. , • CP k, ' 4s.s a` #y, Ow' I \ , a Co brote,ryp0��` r Q OA411111144411V eft° toren lake Chonme Buffer Size: 500 0 100 200 400 Feet Map Comments: I l l l I 1 1 1 I 1270 WildhurstTr This data (0 is frrnished 'AS is. with no representation as to completeness or accuracy;(U)is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (ii) is notsiitable for Ie gal, engineeitng or surveying IP purposes.Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulbng from this data For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55487/gis.info@hennepin.us RUN DATE:01/19/2022 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 07-117-23 23 0031 38 07-117-23 24 0049 38 07-117-23 31 0037 • K WALLACE&J WALLACE BRIAN H&VALERIE A KEETS BRIAN ROATH&LISA R ROATH 1180 GARDEN CT 1160 GARDEN CT 1200 WILDHURST TR ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 KEEGAN WALLACE BRIAN H&VALERIE A KEETS BRIAN ROATH JESSICA WALLACE 1160 GARDEN CT LISA ROATH 1180 GARDEN CT MOUND MN 55364 1200 WILDHURST TR MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 23 0032 38 07-117-23 24 0050 38 07-117-23 31 0038 R M MARTINEZ&S E HUDLESTON G R BLOOM&T A BLOOM ASIM MAJEED/GRACE M MAJEED 1150 GARDEN CT 4475 FOREST LAKE LANDING 1261 WILDHURST TR ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 RICHARD M MARTINEZ GEORGE R BLOOM ASIM MAJEED 1150 GARDEN CT N THERESA A BLOOM 1261 WILDHURST TR MOUND MN 55364 4475 FOREST LAKE LANDING MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 24 0005 38 07-117-23 31 0008 38 07-117-23 31 0040 SUSAN JACOBSON FRANK WEIGEL/ESTHER NAZAROV A J ZABILLA&H N ZABILLA 4445 FOREST LAKE LANDING 4496 NORTH SHORE DR 1297 WILDHURST TR ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 SUSAN JACOBSON FRANK WEIGEL ANDREW&HITOMI ZABILLA 4445 FOREST LAKE LANDING ESTHER NAZAROV 1297 WILDHURST TRAIL ORONO MN 55364 3916 N POTSDAM AVE PMB 3078 ORONO MN 55364 SIOUX FALLS SD 57104 38 07-117-23 24 0007 38 07-117-23 31 0009 38 07-117-23 31 0042 BRIAN&SANDRA RASMUSSEN TRT JOHN J GROTANS DEREK ZAUGG&JENNIFER ZAUGG 1186 WILDHURST TR 4480 NORTH SHORE DR 1298 WILDHURST TR ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 BRIAN D RASMUSSEN JOHN J GROTANS DEREK ZAUGG&JENNIFER ZAUGG SANDRA J RASMUSSEN 3200 29TH AGE N E 1298 WILDHURST TR 1186 WILDHURST TR MPLS MN 55418 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 24 0027 38 07-117-23 31 0015 38 07-117-23 31 0043 PAUL GRAVES&LAURA GRAVES TRAVIS DEJONG/JULIE DEJONG MARK HONG&SUSANNA WONG 1146 WILDHURST TR 1270 WILDHURST TR 1300 WILDHURST TR ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 • PAUL GRAVES&LAURA GRAVES TRAVIS DEJONG MARK HONG&SUSANNA WONG 8634 VALLEY VIEW CT JULIE DEJONG 1300 WILDHURST TR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 1270 WILDHURST TR MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 24 0037 38 07-117-23 31 0026 38 07-117-23 32 0024 S W&M J ERIKSON KELLY MARIE KAHLERT TRUST KATHLEEN G ASH REV TRUST 4455 FOREST LAKE LANDING 1284 WILDHURST TR 4615 TONKAVIEW LA ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 SANFORD&MARGARET ERIKSON KELLY KAHLERT KATHLEEN G ASH 4455 FOREST LAKE LANDING 1284 WILDHURST TR 4615 TONKAVIEW LA MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 24 0038 38 07-117-23 31 0029 38 07-117-23 32 0027 JON D BLACKSTONE ET AL P SAWICKI&K M SAWICKI A C SEVERSON&W L SEVERSON 4465 FOREST LAKE LANDING 4510 NORTH SHORE DR 4635 TONKAVIEW LA ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 JON D BLACKSTONE P SAWICKI&K M SAWICKI ALENA C SEVERSON 4465 FOREST LAKE LANDING 4510 NORTH SHORE DR WILLIAM L SEVERSON MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 4635 TONKAVIEW LA MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 24 0044 38 07-117-23 31 0030 38 07-117-23 32 0043 MICHAEL S WEAR&BRIT S WEAR BETH E BESSESEN KENNETH J HICKEY 1134 WILDHURST TR 4500 NORTH SHORE DR 4640 TONKAVIEW LA ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 MICHAEL S WEAR BETH E BESSESEN KENNETH J HICKEY 1134 WILDHURST TR 4500 NORTH SHORE DR 4640 TONKAVIEW LA MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 24 0047 38 07-117-23 31 0031 38 07-117-23 32 0045 TIMOTHY&LORIE LINE PATTI MAE SCHIMMEL ET AL J P PRUITT&K A PRUITT 4415 FOREST LAKE LANDING 1299 WILDHURST TR 1220 GARDEN CT ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 TIMOTHY&LORIE LINE PATTI MAE HYLEN JEFFREY P PRUITT 4415 FOREST LAKE LANDING PO BOX 67 KATHERINE A PRUITT MOUND MN 55364 NORWOOD YOUNG AMERICA MN 1220 GARDEN CT 55368 MOUND MN 55364 • 38 07-117-23 24 0048 38 07-117-23 31 0036 38 07-117-23 32 0046 TA&J B SUTTON B J CLOSE&J B POTTS CLOSE C M GROSS&K C MURPHY JR 1170 GARDEN CT 1214 WILDHURST TR 1240 GARDEN CT ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 THOMAS A SUTTON BRADLEY J CLOSE CHELSEA MARIE GROSS 1170 GARDEN CT N 1214 WILDHURST TR KENNETH C MURPHY JR MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 1240 GARDEN CT MOUND MN 55364 RUN DATE:01/19/2022 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:2 38 07-117-23 32 0063 AMANDA ERICKSON/RYAN FLATEN • 4620 TONKAVIEW LA ORONO MN 55364 AMANDA M ERICKSON RYAN B FLATEN 4620 TONKAVIEW LA MOUND MN 55364 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. • • • Date Application Received: 02/23/2022 Date Application Considered as Complete:03/07/2022 IZLO` VO 60-Day Review Period Expires: 05/06/2022 timt To: Chair McCutcheon and Planning Commission Members y Adam Edwards, City Administrator `°� .G. .1kEsHO� From: Melanie Curtis, Planner h'1GG Date: 21 March 2022 Subject: #LA22-000013,JALIN Design LLC o/b/o Dale and Cynthia Wunderlich, 2726 Caroline Avenue Variance Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance in order to construct additions to the home, lakeward of the average lakeshore setback. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The property is situated on somewhat of a knob of land on an otherwise linear shoreline which 1 • creates an abnormal average lakeshore setback line as it is defined affecting the subject property and the immediate lakeshore neighbors. The owners would like to construct additions on the lake side of the home including a main level expansion of the kitchen and a screen porch all which will encroach approximately 15 feet into the average lakeshore setback; and rebuilding an existing deck with a slightly expanded footprint, 21.5 feet into the average lakeshore setback, no closer to the lake than the existing deck. An average lakeshore setback variance is required. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information:The applicant has identified the shoreline,the adjacent homes,and the shape and orientation of the subject property as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance.Additionally,they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff agrees that the location of the existing home with respect to the shoreline and the home to the north contribute to the practical difficulty on this property.The sudden, brief curve of the shoreline also creates a challenge regarding the average lakeshore setback affecting this property. 0 FILE#LA22-000013 21 March 2022 Page 2 of 5 LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET • Section 78-350 and 78-1279—Setbacks: LR-1C DISTRICT Required Existing Proposed Rear/Street 30' NA NA North Side 10' 10' house 27' deck 28' deck South Side 10' 10.9' house 38' house addition Lakeshore 75' 102' deck 110' house The existing home is 2.5 feet and the deck is 21.5 feet lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line.The proposed Average Lakeshore improvement will not encroach further than the existing deck. The house addition will extend approximately 15 feet into the average lakeshore setback. Section 78-350—Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100' Actual 36,510 s.f. (0.8 acre) 122' @ 75'/ 122' @ OHWL • Section 78-1403—Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 36,510 s.f. (0.8 acre) Allowed: 7,302 s.f. (20%) Existing: 3,497 s.f. (9.5%) Proposed: 3,915 s.f. (10.7%) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700—Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Tier Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier 1 36,510 s.f. 9,127 s.f. 7,221 s.f. 7,359 s.f. (25%) (19.8%) (20.1%) Applicable Regulations: Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Code Section 78-1279) The subject property it is situated on somewhat of a knob or bump in the shoreline and the result is the average lakeshore setback requirement pushes the home approximately 20 feet further from the lake than the neighbor to the south. The additions to the home have been designed to minimize the impact to the adjacent properties and the views of the lake. The proposed additions will encroach into the average • FILE#LA22-000013 21 March 2022 Page 3 of 5 lakeshore setback 15 feet,and the reconstructed deck will generally be in the same footprint, however the applicant is proposing to square off the corners rather than rebuilding the clipped corner footprint that exists today. The new deck and stair will be no closer to the lake than existing. Due to the average lakeshore setback, no improvements can be constructed on the lake side of the home without variances. Governing Regulation:Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health,safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14,when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. • According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance.The proposed variance is in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance.The property includes difficulties in its shape,the existing dense vegetation along both property lines,the orientation of the shoreline, location of adjacent homes,and the existing home's proximity to the lake.The average lakeshore setback variance will not further impact views of the lake for adjacent properties. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variances to construct additions to the home on this property are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of the home additions in the proposed location partially within the average lakeshore setback appears to be reasonable considering the orientation of the neighboring homes with respect to the lakeshore, the existing vegetative screening, and adjacent properties creates difficulties. The request is reasonable. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The unique shape of the property and shoreline, the existing home's location with respect to the lake and the neighboring home locations prevent lakeside expansions of the residential footprint consistent with the neighborhood. The proposed overall hardcover level is conforming. The circumstances are unique to the property;and FILE#LA22-000013 21 March 2022 Page 4 of 5 c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance is • requested in order to permit construction of additions to the home designed to fit the character of the neighborhood according to the submitted information. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable,as a single family home is an allowed use in the LR-1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property's unique shape and orientation with respect to the lakeshore,and the setback from the lake of the adjacent homes create difficulties for the Owners in improving the property consistent with the homes in their neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The property's unique shape, shoreline orientation, and the • relationship between the existing home and the setback of the adjacent properties create difficulties for the owners. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Granting the average lakeshore setback variance is necessary for the preservation of the property right of the owners. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variance in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The requested variance is necessary, and does not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments Comments have been received from the affected neighbors on both sides which support the applicant's request. Comments are attached as Exhibit H. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the • FILE#LA22-000013 21 March 2022 Page 5 of 5 • property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the average lakeshore setback variance as requested. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application & Narrative Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing Conditions Survey Exhibit D. Proposed Survey Exhibit E. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit F. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit G. Aerial Photos Exhibit H. Neighbor Comments Exhibit I. Property Owners List Exhibit J. Plat Map • PC Exhibit A Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 02/23/2022 • Address: 2726 Caroline AVE Orono, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 2011723240005 Land Use Number: LA22-000013 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: CYNTHIA J WUNDERLICH TRUST Address: FREDERIC D WUNDERLICH TRUST 18080 VIA BELLAMARE LANE Applicant: Name: Jeff Lindgren Company: JALIN Design,LLC Address: 6514 108th Trail N. Brooklyn Park, MN 55445 jlindgren@jalin-design.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Jeff Lindgren jlindgren@jalin-design.com Associated Contact: Dan Schmidt schmidt@sathre.com Associated Contact: Steve Schwieters • Andrea@wooddalebuilders.com Associated Contact: Project Description: ALS Variance-Kitchen Area 3 Season Porch Addition Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application 1 Applicant Signature: f At' • TO: City Of Orono FROM: Cindy and Dale Wunderlich (Property Owner) SUBJECT: Variance Narrative DATE: February 21,2022 RE: 2726 Caroline Ave. Orono,MN A future of owning a home on Lake Minnetonka has always been a dream of ours. We have been boaters for over 40 years and the last 20 plus years have been spent boating on Lake Minnetonka whenever we had any free time. The peacefulness of the lake was always our idea of the perfect relaxing afternoon. We have rented a slip for our boat on Brown's Bay for years in hopes that at some point we would find our own perfect home on Lake Minnetonka. We have looked for several years for a walkout rambler style home that would be one we could grow old in and that had a beautiful lot as well. We are very fortunate to have been able to secure a beautiful property on Carman Bay at 2726 Caroline Avenue. The home is on a beautifully situated lot,however we would like to make some updates and • improvements to the home as nothing has been touched since it was built back in 1989. We are looking to completely update the interior and exterior of the home to match the quality level and appeal of the surrounding homes on Casco Point. Most of the other lakefront homes in the area have already been fully updated. We are also interested in rebuilding the deck within its existing footprint which is in need of replacement due to rotting decking and siding. We are proposing to extend our kitchen dining area out a few feet as well as add a three season porch to the main level. Both additions would not extend any further than the existing deck does currently,and neither would interfere in any way with the enjoyment and views of the lake by our neighbors. We have presented our plan to both of our neighbors on either side of us,and both are in full favor of our proposed home improvement plans and have provided us a letter for their support of the project. We have recently had some much needed tree work and trimming done which removed some dead trees and invasive buckthorn. We do plan to do some landscaping improvements to make the exterior of the home more appealing as much of it now is overgrown on all sides of the home. We also have plans to replace the existing dock which is rotting and in need of much repair. We graciously request that the board approve our variance and we look forward to spending many years ahead enjoying lakeside living. Thank you, 110 Dale and Cindy Wunderlich PC Exhibit B PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA22-000013 • 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: Yes, the new homeowners are currently taking steps to make this their forever home, but are strategically taking steps to better the property by remodeling the original interior and exterior details and finishes. In addition, the existing lower level heated porch w/ deck above are structurally failing and need much repair to be considered safe and feel repurposing these living spaces to the main level, while not getting any closet to the lake, will make for a more aesthetically pleasing structure and internal use. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: Yes, through discussions with the city and survey review, the new owners have found that because of the irregular shaped shoreline and the North homes relocation of a new home constructed 2000, created an average lake shore setback that would cut through the current home that once was found to be conforming when it was constructed in 1989. They have also determined that the existing porch and deck are not safe due to failing structural members from to long-term leaks and poor maintenance. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The approach were requesting is being done with the intention of bringing the spirit back to this site and so it can work harmoniously with the neighborhood's irregular shaped shoreland and rolling yard contours. Our intent is to add beauty to the already charming, yet eclectic, character found in the surrounding homes. We plan to update the existing home's exterior finishes that will blend seamlessly with our proposed addition. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: The variance request for this structure has nothing to do with an economic decision. It is based on ordinances changes due to homes around them that are dealing with an irregular shaped shoreland and new build locations changes. We have discussed our planned addition with the neighbors to the North and South and who collectively feel the thoughtful placement will not impair neighbor sightlines as these homes are orientated away from our home, as seen in aerial views. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116].06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: AGREE 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any , use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: AGREE Ai7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: AGREE 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: Correct, The current home was originally constructed in 1989 and was considered conform given the home to the North was closer to the lake. Due to the new home to the North being built in 2000, it rendered the back portion of the home Nonconforming for the Average Lake Shore Setback. In addition, this property and others around, do have irregularly shaped shorelines that can create a pinching affect for some home. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: Correct, This request only applies to our location due to the circumstances of rebuilding homes on different timelines that alter setback locations on property parcels thereby have differing average lake shore setbacks. In addition, when having an irregularly shaped shoreline, it have the potential to push and pull home locations. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a ` substantial property right of the applicant. Response: Yes, Updating the structure so it is safe is imperative. In addition, the owners are making this their forever home and want to be able to enjoy what living on a lake is all about, which is connecting your everyday lifestyle with the outdoor element and our proposed addition allows this to take place in a meaningful way. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: Correct. Our intent is to improve these attributes by updated the dated structure and by creating an overall aesthetically pleasing facade that is enjoyable for neighbors and boaters passing by. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: Correct The existing heated porch and above deck is falling apart due to poor water management and settling overtime and is not safe. Our intent is rebuild the deck portion using current construction methods and flashing techniques and to recreate a more suitable living space and porch on the main level so it is a safer and more manageable structure. 0 (..) i R, 11/ 11:111 * P IX IMM 12 i if e 1 5 2 1 Ill - I IT ph ID li i: ''' L t P21 i 01 1 11S t 141 jit6; OX ji 11 l' .,:-/- '''; 1i s ta. ILLI ill a .rt 'II ill! -..4. ,,, --'' ii 4"Iiiiiini:N1414;11;1411P = Leib., Ag 15 is gh iggg . li 1111. ; !./ 1 i I i • IP,1 ci c * 1/" --:1 )' IIIII1 I I II L=J' • in; I I; li I !!el. P 2 M15 i511) 6511661.101d-1164450, > W 11i111 1 I 11 ii 1 11 i .itt n w - t III . i II •1 I 11 , = 1 pi i 1 21 i 11 I I - Itu ...I .. I J t 1 t ii" 0 t i 1 ji i • i 1 i - ' ! '1 k 1 ----- '' 1 ilit :Willa 0 4 8 . . 1 01 4 J 1 . i j I- i 11,1 t. , I di !. i i 1 / II i re _. ;ivihilal gliIII"1" . w higill!ffigginiiiAliilgiiiig I i 1 Hi 01 1 II I Ili I ll' 1 . oevat400ve...404.....•::..8.4•Ev.0111.‘c 1:1-• U 1 i . i.t 4 ., irl I 1. :it 1 11. . 1.1 141 U i 1 I Ili b I si!WI 1 i?-- 11/ 1 Iiii, 1 • a .:141_ u CI i 11 fel 1; $ It Wit/ i11 In I PIN ! '•,,, 111141! 4 ' ' a u... ' It I iii11 ! -,,,1 P phi il 1 pi I 1 i; i , ! 1 1=-11 1 1 i i ill:. ! *1111,1110:-Agt-. tu-tNt WI di 1 I 1 . ti 1 ;,t'i t ittiEltt,W,Httfligggisttlitt 1 A .! ill I 11 I hi q < 4 2 11 - 0 z i 0 Z 1 --i H- \ cog 53 14E-01410' \ at o- tx1"14114 .....“,"'"1- -----', ...- ' u.1 ..- 1 mi 1C121! - i..r.— ....4.„*.•'-',04 , \ t \i t_..1----- ,-.$,$.r -4,-,' i ., , ,--- --7— • . ' "'C.-5V. *.1 ''?•:--'''..'',.. , •:-. \ t 1 - : ` --- a : - i .,--k: ; ,' ' ; 1---- i', • \ ! , i - \ \ , rz' ' ---'•t' ' \ - `4. i = ; i--"*.l. •'., /:..---t-\ • 1--__,/ \ I .,. 0 1 I f 0.i i ,,7----,c,..kir. .;;:it,,, ; ! - \ • 1, \ t i ... 0 :•,...'`',. \, •*0:5' -' 1,..";:'4::: ,..,,,, .,,, ,.\ ' a \ 4 ..:. . -"..,' ,..'"-f ek '-% ::..-,--„,-- , . i.. . \i• _• .. A - 0 II 1 ki .1, I )1 . , so o.. ii • , \ 1J I .,. '''' tj I C- '-' - .'i i -..- - :.'''a., ', \-,.: - f '3',.,,,i7,,,,7 . • \ . ' a- ficill • - 1 ' g. • ' 0" . '----, ,:':-.'.- \ II i r, a ! ‘ -,..,'„,- ,:f t -ti .• o , ' • - \i 6, , • 4101 5 51 i \ 0 5.61 15551 5 0 , f ..1„)1 ! 0 e.,.. .. ' . y .. golill , / \-"', s•1 1MP"/ t iA[ 1-' - 4., - / `i • F:: ' /tEg w4 e -.• t , ,0 i , / R • ! t. `• -,- PIPPO , 1 5 -cf-.„,- ' i "', '-'7' A * . 0 It:1‘ -- :S, ' ' ' il ' t I/fr . 0 'V - /. '' I!i P.i/,' , 0 14' ' t' sy, i :Si.:.,_•", . ,i 1 .,. ;-..,• nil', •r•" ; . 4.' .- z \„,,. c‘).,...,,... ,11:7it; ,..) ..: z3s. ' ‘,.) ,r) ',,), • - 0 un i vi 1 -'-. '-•60--:%-t. ."` ' l!' . , 44a,03 < ..3 . ' . ...:.% / ------ 714 `'' :1A;•—• 0 / 111,-;,,,---I ----- -..., -----,kr? >•• /1 1 ,.......... ,c) •-••., / I I •-•...,... \"-----,-.„,.,:, ',..,..... >, .• 511 --..,„ --....... / --..„. -...,... / higiiii -........ '''•1-... i 1 � ` 0 It a !a lit; s i Y a ! d+ F1 ii 6 Il 1E1, lid Y s' H ' 'f 1,1. mfiI• U x1. 1; `'r��d Wk P 1 t;}i 1 ,`f 1 j 1 it , Ji i7 R a 3 ! a 6 I g M ' s �� 5 $ H 11111 �igt "I i j � aKes' !i'8 a SFY. Q 2 ��� i U o: U f i �� � 1.#j ! Ili 1 11 ' 11 i j T eevvmaeoceav+, oesses*/.mo:".. Wa a` i if dill i 1 I� 1 13 j 1 p a ;° U Ca ' !! 1 qi it Ea ' 11.,. Hi 1 'iU 9 1 1 7 na OoexxxxG4OaeomuaeoopIILffleMO0E9mo _ r, ; c a s , c a • ZO ' EY Z a/ 0 Z U Z_ H- 60 a IN E KA i \ 03 EM N TON LAK „,.rt.a-.2"-.___...,, 1$ goa,xi.x,w w. ,R,toxo- ,t /�, \ m -�'a w...wn°°"��Ya-fo*.. x i '1j------ �a i II ' kat�p s'^ _ 1 i Ems— % ,p i . .r' \ Q is au.'-'4,—' ''` \ cn9} :;: Y 0 * •� �� i \ 1 4 3 '!''', ,z \ ./''''- ' . .---\ , t.._ .jill‘ \ I' u ^ s 6, • sE .�- ',' :::, 3 \ E y6 m,..„...0, , ,ar�,^" �w,y '\ : \ �.v� ��o i �• t3! % �.F".l .c R i , ,. o \ J • 'Z o t �j { l \ li w lit'1 iJ r,i cn b , i Xf,-„.,,\,_ -, \a, ' 0 „ • ..01:11, 0 ..- .- Q,. \ ,. iillTaqg LT .,. 115 qi!f ,4^' lillilli 2 v^ " � ' !IE ( ',.-4, 0 -1.1, \ ,,, vv \ \ \ \ 1111,111 c NW'ONQ O 3�3'Ey s °I°`� a_= z Q '3A`d3N110)ND 9ZLZ �g�Fg11 �ylsg . ;r - -, NS 8 3JN3CIIS321 H)I11134Nf1M 11161110111; 4.1 A— 0 41) • V x 0 a _ O. W 1ri.6 5` Waa o , �} gg w2 p`s N(1NN6TONKA i eo n \ 2 < 5 § �[°ae 1�` LAKE wco-- .....M,•,, �i Mig. S z \ W5 N i / ; /5 F. , ii, sag 1 A 3 / 't ,/ ueg ` LL-- s €- 1---.),,-.. -,a \ 1 8 j SAz LI..I m s73 \ _ p„ i "' ,.blw\\ ' 4) J � a g1'§ ` ! 7,f k\ 1st i'� 1 e �� '9e - 11 .a• �, • I2 1 2 7C n m 22 b �` s`s.� '� -,2. .0 .Y 00 W E. f f. C'1 / P �� \ g b 9w J i �\? oel . ‘,„ . 1 , . , . - ; -;21V-s,. n,.. . \,,:,..:-4,fi::;:o \ tel! J �� ,.;A .O rj g.-,,,./4,-',--,.-4:,-----d ` 2 111' ‘k..,-\ s ,„14:y / =o (V ug ;E. a _ ;/„'71•V Jt `Y _`i i . • • co ,ii n a (Vc. KJai\ ../ SFr; • i \ w '''. \ \- .3 \ \ F - sof \ Z 5 \ \ u \ g uW . !I E i 5: 1 i 9 • $a 6_ '6 g i 3 $ l o a 3 ggg ! `4 o.g -- 1 @ 04 g c g $ o i s q.'g 1 4 $ X 11 PIli i ingl$ i2 il'? a oSa @ d ei' ',g'4"'"'".41044gi$ Li dflfg i 1 „11""iaggN g [ '0 F e€ y§ $ f;iI'''"P'";;f ^di Cz s� di Siadlgi iii ®® M -,,,,o0.00 , j G ����r�.�€�:���� :344 ao� "a3E€a eee���ztc� .Ss. 9.s 5s „s3sS9�sa�����.,��aaf;����1 �E 41� si$lisilm II , 5 1 0 i 01 . j 2 C j Q ...Leg igilnAll 8id$g g5w,4882 hiNhug gh,Ig S€gsAi ,,,gl k§sEt..-A.Eidgfl gdg.g"o.rlfrlt35; shad2flid/4€ x 9a8$ _ t 5, 4 ' } 3 K:� s C'. a NW'ONObO ��!°�!'! p'�°:i t o:: a ? z O Q 3Ad 3NI1Ob dJ 9ZLZ F'l�Tihl ihil.i# E - i ,,0 0 q 3 3�N3GIS32i H�1�2�34Nf1M Illhi iii I I ii#dd31 -° Q • A ■ R e II1 i i iill il4:'-,,S - •\\ 0 0 ie •• i • i 11 Ie e �NI •••• e i • ••,!. gig Q 1 i 16. •o' 1:. is iti S i 41i ,••e ,�!!!• Lei i e_g 4 l 00'•+•• 00•••44 # Q p • ♦ 1 s 69 iii4 3 f Y s. ••/. ag t e ' E 11 � �` i' _---->,'/11, \' ''••!!!ti 41 i 0 IV11 1 11 ill gig p ;:•iiii€ I� \\'\\�mv�. ..� D0,!!�y• � t g� l99 it ii#pd i ti iii ,. , ;.�! O©© O i.! tit:t3 01 r- 1 1 al .1 ; 1 '., # • 1 ii s + O —`E P R # IT 1� {O1I11! /I p FIiii Q �.~ -•-- i ' g 1 111 L 91 a CI igi i J eglii kl f ..-!...._114 000 O O IJl3il z II 'I I• 9 R diR � 1 i iiif • $ gg i ` L :i i i it iI s== • i IQ i iLi Lill 1 1 LI Lill Li Li / `I 41 �1 41 ,1 i . `1 %1 1 i<II . g �t 11 z w,4 5,: ¢ NW'ONO21O nai°iso° jlla1 4 a z+ z 0 0 -3AV 3NI1O21VJ 9ZLZ hrt p i: O� S O 3 3DN3CIIS31 HDI11134Nf1M aii;al�i���o _° Q IIIg� � 3p 1 J • � 5 ?� aR pRp R� 1 9 R R1 8 1 5 §IIrr.;, . ; i 1 Iiill (-,--..sL , '-' ,6 J b 4 4l/e ii a 1§1 ' 1 �R;lf g6 0111111di ,, I! diei !8 H Jg . 1 ly 1 , ://' // / 11 1 i 0., ,, , , 01, op , p i i 1 1 ig op ,, [ 3a Q 3} ,I 1, I 2 'ItIT 1 i III i 1, u, ,,;,41--- p_- E 1 a I Rill i g444 a Ji IN g s i;g 1 1 !lig `J� � `'L i 11 i 11$ 1 • ya_.`T_it - O®O O ,('/ -( . .'r i RI el f-Q_--- �I „ „„e p e3 86 di g i (---”' ----- 1 i 1111 ill 1 If, ! 11iillill I 1 ' 1ii 111 000 0 0 i 1I N diild T-'i Fi Ii I: • YY1 ' TrT.T T �= : ELT s r NN ONObO i°�S¢Eal algal f s;; Q 4 o ?�; o '3AV 3NIlOdVJ 9ZLZ �p la€3Qg�Et�; ° P ,, 3 3�N3aIS32i H�I12134Nf1M = �l;ilse11 Q 1 1 1 I; 41111 § , hi 1 \ li ,0ghl 1 , , 110 € _ a; II, 0 . 1 \1 1 NM i3 111 g „ g1, 1 I 1 ,11r Q i yg 1 R a 95 ::h 11 I 10 pNIP i! PM igg EpE55 tp7R b 1ilip - 'ill4 SS 1 1 / Ill PI Illii il! 9n ;§g3 €€g RgGgR3e3 i.F1 ,g „ ,g,„pp • 1ilhtilI 1 IT INV i'll 1 F�t$ •• g5 itI I\ . iP i1 \-- , s 1:1ez @u ••�� i I a .y i ,y74 1a A. \ Ay•e•". I I e� a - „.. - •0 { I .I EI NI' I _. Q 44 I %I Lg _ m , 0 , I , 7-- , 1 I� 3 I — j I 11 > !$ O E i i E P11 ____.(2r,, i\� t_ —3 lis >1 i 111 55 EI I _ ® l I 11 i - _,bst��ga��� i Ali �g A 1 s; N1 a �• { i 1 a N 1 \\ II ls 11 y\ \ i I I t • i i 1.1 --i --z—%—, 1 a NW'ONO110 9��"}F'' ��° a?a 5 w a h . '3AV 9NIlO�1VD 9ZLZ la"=11,1,118^ 3 w 11 0 E g 3JN341S311 HD111134Nf1M li oNI 4 n �1 o e Q • ' 11 ge 11- $ind I '1'g 1 gill° "s2 MI 11 1111 Aigii1 MI 8 ;it; est k9@� a i hII�'l'M I. °�,� lir °ii,,, 1rilyewe e3@s�e.ig g 1olifito i I3 i ii 3• 1111 M011.111 x$ ', a. i!Ei VI is$ Ai / , , , //,/// _LIIIIIL 1 4 M 0 IWIIIII Iii 1 7F4 , 01=rniiM"..1.11.1%M& , Y ' 1 tii T, VI I� .JOE ..N� o ' , -. i ii t,lml sa }1 i S I� ire—�i��i• ii '� �' hoot f' gHi H y I R8' 1 6 4110 r i ~� iin 9 Et4R i 1 lir.,I:r,— { ■■ p � WIpf � ummin ■■■ ie 1El+ I€ _ _ ' .J --g L_n •7 I I1111 111110 f , .r.� i eti --11 o 4 I, , .„ . t ' ,' -: illiflA IiillidAF FI wir'"--. I 1 OWN IL mom F , F ey I t 1e �+ 4 1 1111 . y: 1 \ 1 1 E:e \ ; ,-.i g ,749 E Z I t )0 R AVN110VD 9ZLZ 4 -,..8 NW ON0110 '3 3 )1 3D N3CIIS311 HD11 ]ClNIIM 11111MOIN 1 !j. ! i 1§ 'il iFiliitil tg hidiridaqiig Pii01/11111 i ii li il 0 cl <C 0 II li i gli ip .7 11 d 11 .., iv) [ Ig V ill 1 [ MI I 1 F ! ......._. .., ' ' ,„. .„... 1 • ,, , ii ., f 1 , 1 1 II, .2 \ 1 A I iv , ' `-, --,-, ti /177// .... ... H g! q h ii _ ) It ' • I k, I I it, mit , li, . .. . . .... . , „. ,. . . .... , , . ... ,.. „,. . , _.,._. _ _ _ - __-- i... 'g I ---,-• . __ —,_ _;--- ( 1 !_. _ — . _ — - — - . — — _ _ - 1 at” • , as 6z1;. L.1 < , N14`ON0110 33 1ZLZ 3DN3CIIS321 HD11213GNIIM 01110 i s-i .1. 0 hot414.43 0 — AVNI101VD 9 '111111111 2 J 3 B !Ohio 1 1 gni/HI & < (116. I,. r ' R i 3Y3 1 , A. a II I I I 11111 I I Id I II I I S . of . • i'Vrir 1 Piill 11 I I ,.., 11111111 I ti ,t; 1 • • t. , s 11011111iiiiii 1 .. . ---I MI Mil 1 11 I 1 1115 I I 1 I , /I , Illi 1 Zia I rill ' , \ ' LA 7, i I I I __, cy, 7 ; '-:-.-:1.-Ifirli iiiIIIIIII ,,,, ,.._ 'y , /IP I mg liAlp li ... ,_ lI 1 AM MR \U 10 d d i Pill ___ 11.11" '--.. ...: ' '''' 1 ,, 4 A ,i'i Y '/ , A to, - w if- 9.4 It'; 2 11111i. 11 1 PM 111 11 PIP il II 1 \ ki". OM. 1 IA II IIIIIII I I 'ii II 10I ! I - rer 1 TOM II I I .mm.•1 off 141 i I 1 , iimmolic .. 1 . •j, ill I \\ I • PC City of Orono Exhibit F Hardcover Calculation Worksheet ! Property Address: 2726 Caroline Avenue,Orono,Minnesota 55391 (4ki_ Prepared By: Sathre-Bergquist Date: 12/7/2021 SB Job Number: 98633-001 Prepared by: DZB Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier:(Circle One) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1:EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table,identify all items of existing hardcover on the property,keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form).Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property.For Tier 1 properties,Identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total(Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A House 3,417 S.F. B Stoop 80 S.F. C Paver Driveway 2831 S.F. D Paver Sidewalk 141 S.F. E Paver Patio 297 S.F. F Concrete Patio 400 S.F. G Concrete Steps 62 S.F. H Paver Step 4 S.F. Retaining Walls 335 S.F. Concete Apron 89 S.F. K S.F. L • S.F. S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1)Total Existing Hardcover 7,656.00 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): F Retaining Wall 335 S.F. G Deck(first 100 ft) 100 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2)Total Excludable Hardcover 435 S.F. (3)Net Existing Hardcover[Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 7,221.00 S.F. (4)Total Lot Area 36,510 S.F. Existing Hardcover Percentage[(3)+(4)] 19.78% • (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an information packet regarding Hardcover.Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information con trained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. ,- - City of Orono l� � '1 Hardcover Calculation Worksheet III yE ; i Property Address: 2726 Caroline Avenue,Orono,Minnesota 55391 v °AfsH aE Prepared By: Sathre-Bergquist Date: 12/7/2021 SB Job Number: 98633-001 Prepared by: DZB Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier:(Circle One) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1:PROPOSED HARDCOVER Edited/corrected by staff Key to Survey Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total(Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A House 3,417 S.F. B Stoop 80 S.F. C Paver Driveway 2831 S.F. D Paver Sidewalk 141 S.F. E Paver Patio 0 S.F. F Proposed Deck 307 S.F. G Concrete Steps 14 S.F. H Paver Step 4 S.F. I Retaining Walls 231 S.F. J Concete Apron 89 S.F. K Proposed Home Addition 162 S.F. L Proposed Three Season Porch 256 S.F. III M Proposed Balcony 98 S.F. N Proposed Retaining Wall 92 S.F. O Proposed Concrete Pad 25 S.F. P Proposed Stairs 35 S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. y S.F. Z S.F. (1)Total Existing Hardcover 7,782.00 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): I&N Retaining Wall 323 S.F. F Deck(first 100 ft) 100 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2)Total Excludable Hardcover 423 S.F. (3)Net Existing Hardcover[Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 7,359.00 S.F. (4)Total Lot Area 36,510 S.F. Existing Hardcover Percentage[(3)+(4)] 20.16% % (Proposed Hardcover next page) • This is an information packet regarding Hardcover.Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contrained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. PC Exhibit G ' "'r ', y• '''- f •S' ,.` C* t t, y .C�$ '• 1t I r, 0,,,2.-.‘ , dl� �pK�Y � t :* �..` ,...... J raj ` �� "1111.,r....iv ,,, ,, ,„,t s • . . , .,,.. z. .,. .e. ......,. ''X , k. .ar ' t.r s.j: F i -1,,....-- `4 "h- .; Y`-- , '•{.A i � , Lis. .Y. t� Sy. 1y' :f �'. � N ';';:.:.:11y ♦ t-.bSe `�i Sl r \ . ' • •41,-rf, ,t7*"*:•,.4,1 „,• • .. _ , .,5, ,-.4c.;: 11$^,r. . .,..,:',. • ' ' ' .i14'-: ix �'-` �. ilk i +�"''- * Y! " I _� � •t r � �" t.a5 �..• � •tom t.� � >#f a r i f 'r '- 'yam • .1-' r '� - .` x.r' Panorama < ThuApr12021 +� _ .i'" '�/R' �,, be Vf Wil'3, .4w 4---9, ., • - ,,, _.: 1ir - _ , ' ae '✓ 1 •t, ..'. +. r.ter- , • .Yk ,� .of, "" a 1. r a, • r,.. T • .n 4 `t .iia . .'Si.'4./0 .=dig /' ,. • ,e' s` r r • r. • r Ote- 1.,f,. . , • , _ Panorama < Thu Apr 12021 el „vigil, '4 • \:',}14'7.. V , , $L d h q 2 • �•• � i� ,, � ,. �'y' h J �\ ,�I fie. •i h r '#, .t •-• ,.. . 1/ o$ '”{�l,�, • ' ' A 4 %. ''44, • - .. ff . ' I 'C, .,''I ' -� :hr�� c' ~., ,l sl /' , id Y � • _ '' ' rzt, - , . „ ,,,, , , . , .. ,... *-. ,._ i r Panorama < Thu Apr 12021 j,., 0 PC Exhibit H 4111 LETTER OF SUPPORT City of Orono 2750 Kelley Pkwy Long Lake, MN 55356 Re. Variance Request to encroach on Average Lake Side Setback Dear City Zoning and Planning Personnel, I/We have reviewed the proposed survey and home addition plans from Dale and Cindy Wunderlich located at 2726 Caroline Ave. We understand they would like to pursue a Variance request to build an addition to the rear of their home that would encroach into the Average Lake Side Setback. We don't feel this will be an impairment to our lake views and fully support the approval of said variance. • Sincerely, Mike Darula 2696 Caroline Ave. Orono, MN 55391 • . LETTER OF SUPPORT City of Orono 2750 Kelley Pkwy Long Lake,MN 55356 Re. Variance Request to encroach on Average Lake Side Setback Dear City Zoning and Planning Personnel, I/We have reviewed the proposed survey and home addition plans from Dale and Cindy Wunderlich located at 2726 Caroline Ave. We understand they would like to pursue a Variance request to build an addition to the rear of their home that would encroach into the Average Lake Side Setback. We don't feel this will be an impairment to our lake views and fully support the approval of said variance. Sincerely, _ . Robert and Cote Lund 2732 Caroline Ave. Orono, MN 55391 PC Exhibit I 38 20-117-23 24 0003 38 20-117-23 24 0017 38 20-117-23 31 0002 DAVID L RUNKLE KENNETH R SADDLER DONALD SCHRADER 410 2684 CASCO POINT RD SHERALYN K SADDLER 3704 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 2755 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0004 38 20-117-23 24 0018 38 20-117-23 31 0003 DAVID L RUNKLE DONNA L LILE JILL R&WILLIAM H KOCH H 2684 CASCO POINT RD 2765 ETHEL AVE 3730 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0005 38 20-117-23 24 0025 38 20-117-23 31 0004 CYNTHIA J WUNDERLICH TRUST HARRY E PULVER JR JOHN F KLICK FREDERIC D WUNDERLICH TRUST 105 MEADOW LANE N 3703 CASCO AVE 18080 VIA BELLAMARE LANE MINNEAPOLI MN 55422 WAYZATA MN 55391 MIROMAR LAKES FL 33913 38 20-117-23 24 0007 38 20-117-23 24 0033 38 20-117-23 31 0005 RANDALL L ENGELHART ZIV&TAL LIBERMAN ROBERT PRESLER ELIZABETH A ENGELHART 2690 CAROLINE AVE 3709 CASCO AVE 2715 CAROLINE AVE ORONO MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0008 38 20-117-23 24 0034 38 20-117-23 31 0009 DONALD J&DAWN R HEBIG MICHAEL DARULA ALISA A MILLER 2735 CAROLINE AVE 2696 CAROLINE AVE 3753 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 • 38 20-117-23 24 0010 38 20-117-23 24 0040 38 20-117-23 31 0010 LANCE L&RHODA L VICKNAIR CATHERINE R&JOEL W SHOOP PAUL J FUHRMAN 2740 ETHEL AVE 2720 ETHEL AVE COLLEEN FUHRMAN WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 3759 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0013 38 20-117-23 24 0041 38 20-117-23 31 0011 BARBARA S O'REILLY ROBERT T LUND DEAN V GREIMANN 2700 ETHEL AVE 2732 CAROLINE AVE 3779 CASCO AVE ORONO MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0014 38 20-117-23 24 0044 38 20-117-23 31 0020 LAWRENCE D PILLAR JANET C KAUFFMANN PENNY J SAIKI 6827 CARDINAL COVE DR 2696 ETHEL AVE 2874 CASCO POINT RD MOUND MN 55364 WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0015 38 20-117-23 24 0045 38 20-117-23 31 0021 TING FANG LIN MARC COHEN CITY OF ORONO 2725 ETHEL AVE 2697 ETHEL AVE P 0 BOX 66 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 0 38 20-117-23 24 0016 38 20-117-23 24 0046 38 20-117-23 31 0022 AMBER M PEIFER MICHAEL D REVIER CITY OF ORONO 2069 3RD STN 2691 ETHEL AVE P O BOX 66 SAINT PAUL MN 55109-4013 WAYZATA MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23 31 0027 38 20-117-23 31 0071 CITY OF ORONO MARTI LYNN P O BOX 66 STEVEN ROBERT GOUDY • CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 3750 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0039 38 20-117-23 31 0073 DONALD SCHRADER DANIEL CLEMENT PALMER 3704 CASCO AVE THERESA LYNN PALMER WAYZATA MN 55391 2918 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0040 JAMES W&PATRICIA DONGOSKE 3700 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0041 PETER M GRAFFUNDER 3630 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0042 JON DUK KIM&YOUNG HYI AN 4700 COVEY TR MEDINA MN 55340 • 38 20-117-23 31 0043 SUSAN C STIELOW HOME LLC 3660 FORT CHARLES DR NAPLES FL 34102 38 20-117-23 31 0058 DRWELTY&MMJIN 3721 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0062 DAVID HEISER JENNIFER ANN HEISER 2740 CAROLINE AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0066 DEAN V GREIMANN 3779 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0067 • DAVID B ADAMS 2868 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 PC Exhibit J !LJ Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map . • Date: 2/23/2022 1111P1- tt }ron0 * 44 Allipr,p • (,,,.. *4,,„„; . ....., V144.1A 4, Ar�C oap �� \ \• Buffer Size: 500 0 100200 400 Feet Map Comments: I i 1 1 i i i 1 2726 Caroline Ave This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy, Qi)is furnished with no warranty of any • knd, and (ii) is notsuitable for legal, engheering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from the data. For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55487/gis.info@hennepin.us • �-°N04. CITY OF ORONO MEMORANDUM l4kESHO�� DATE: March 21, 2022 TO: Mark McCutcheon, Planning Commissioners Adam Edwards, City Administrator FROM: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director RE: PC Liaisons to City Council though March, 2022 The following is a proposed schedule for Planning Commission member attendance at Council Meetings through March,2023.The Planning Commission will provide a liaison for the first Council meeting of the month only. • Meeting Date Representative April 11 Bob Erickson May 9 Dennis Libby June 13 Mark McCutcheon July 11 Scott Kirchner August 8 Chris Bollis September 12 Matt Gettman October 10 Jon Ressler November 14 Bob Erickson December 12 Dennis Libby February 13,2023 Mark McCutcheon March 13,2023 Scott Kirchner Planning Commission Action Requested Motion to approve the schedule for planning commission member attendance at Council Meetings through March,2022. •