HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 7256 LAND TYPE Abstract(A)
DOC NUM 11089686
Certified, filed and/or recorded on
Mar 22, 2022 12:03 PM
Office of the County Recorder
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Amber Bougie, County Recorder
Mark Chapin, County Auditor and Treasurer
Deputy 104 Pkg ID 2417306E
Document Recording Fee $46.00
Document Total $46.00
This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document.
s OtiO CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
- �,4' NO. 7256
`-,kES H 01�
A RESOLUTION
APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 78-395
FILE NO. LA22-000007
WHEREAS,on January 18, 2022, Garrett Gronberg and Andrea Gronberg, a married
couple, (hereinafter the "Applicant[s]"), applied for variances from the City Code for the property
addressed 65 Stubbs Bay Road North and legally described as:
That part of Section 32, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian,
described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of the Southeast 1/4 of the
Southwest 1/4 of said Section distant 264 feet North of the Southeast corner of said
Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4; thence West a distance of 462.89 feet; thence North a
distance of 350.18 feet; thence Southeasterly, parallel with the centerline of the public
highway known as South Watertown Road, a distance of 499.19 feet to the East line of said
Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4; thence South along said East line, to the point of
beginning, EXCEPT the Northeasterly 10 feet thereof, according to the United States
Government survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Doc. No. A09936263
(hereinafter the"Property");
WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a
variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-395 to allow redevelopment of a property
with nonconforming area and width; and
WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a
variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-395 to allow a front yard setback of 51.7
feet where a 100-foot setback is normally required; and a side yard setback from the south lot line
of 48.8 feet where 50-feet is required; and
WHEREAS, on February 22, 2022, after published and mailed notice in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at
which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity
to speak thereon; and
WHEREAS, on February 22, 2022, the Planning Commission recommended
approval of the variances further recommending the applicant adjust the home to meet both side
yard setback requirements; and
-,WAT CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
yF NO. 7256
e "ES H O
WHEREAS, the Applicants revised the site plan to conform to the required 50-foot
side yard setbacks on both the north and south sides; and
WHEREAS, on March 14, 2022, the City Council reviewed the revised application
and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota
hereby approves the requested variances as revised and as described above based on one or
more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property:
FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA22-000007. The analysis contained
within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the
above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings
are hereby incorporated by reference.
2. The Property is located in the RR-1A Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District.
3. The Property contains 2.48 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 165 feet where
5.0 acres and 300 feet of width are required.
4. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]:
a. Lot Area Variance
b. Lot Width Variance
c. Front Yard Setback Variance
5. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and
recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variances
upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values
of property in the surrounding area.
ANALYSIS:
1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes
and intent of the ordinance . . . ." The Applicants are proposing to construct a new single
family home on a residential lot which is consistent with the intent of the ordinance. The
front yard setback and side yard setback variances requested are reasonable
considering the upland buildable area of the Property and are consistent with the
immediate neighborhood.
2
BOAT CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
y� NO. 7256
`FEES H or-t
2. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the
comprehensive plan."The variances resulting in a permit for a new single family residence
in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are
practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in
connection with the granting of a variance, means that:
a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner,
however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls.
The Applicants are proposing to use the Property in a reasonable manner with the
construction of a single family home. The RR-1A setbacks applied to the lot's
relatively narrow width results in limited options to construct a conforming building
on the upper portion of the site. The front setback proposed is generally consistent
with the existing home and neighbors to the south.
b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created
by the landowner.
The lot's substandard size and topography is not the result of actions by the
property owner; and
c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality."
The proposed location of the new home is consistent with the existing home on the
Property and the character of the neighborhood is not likely to be altered by
construction of the new residence at the proposed setback.
4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic
considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination.
5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight
for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as
defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter
78."This condition is not applicable.
6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under
Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is
located."This condition is not applicable, as a residential home is an allowed use in the RR-
1A District.
3
O CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
y�
� � NO. 7256
-IkES H Os.
7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling
as a two-family dwelling."This condition is not applicable.
8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such
property or immediately adjoining property." The area and width of the Property within the
RR-1A zoning district is unique to the Property and to the immediate neighbors which
support the requested variances.
9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the
land is located." The substandard size of the Property is unique within the 5-acre rural
residential zoning district.
10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant." Lot area and lot width variances are necessary
for the preservation of the owners' Property right; granting the requested front yard
setback variance provides a reasonable buildable area on the substandard property.
11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or
morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." Granting of the
requested variances would not impair health, safety, comfort or morals and would be in
keeping with the intent of the zoning code.
12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but
is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." The topography of the relatively narrow,
uniquely shaped lot within the RR-1A district results in a limited building area for
construction of a single family home on the high portion of the site. The Property's size is
unique for the RR-1A zoning district. Granting the requested variances is necessary.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS:
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants
variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-395 to allow redevelopment of a Property
having substandard width and area with a home 51.7 feet from the front property line where a
100-foot setback is required, subject to the following conditions:
1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings.
2. The approved project shall conform to the survey dated February 25, 2022 and building
plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution
as Exhibits A& B.
4
�tO4 CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
1,� NO. 7256
`�kESHO
3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require
further Planning Commission and City Council review.
4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are
permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new
construction and commencing construction of said project. A building permit must be
obtained within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that
date (March 14, 2023).
5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may
result in the termination of any authority granted herein.
ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 14th day of March, 2022.
ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO:
0#
Nacr270)
Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor
5
\
350.18 \\ \\._...._.... t\.-
/.-....__.._......-N 00°32' 14" w \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ 39.'5,3...-..{\.......-y1-.`
\
i
'
--- --' —-------- �'
y
s
o> N
W
00
STUBBS BAY
—Ay
- _—r�— ------ ROAD SOUTH
" o
O00
WDM
aka C •............... S 00°32' 13" E 152.49............,r u
a
— -5
rt a w '� 3 oi�n�pNm
Nf—Eog4
"- -
>
O g.w' g
o
�$ e
o
••
3 3 pizxm
Q»
a:sa
005
2ql-
°a m�
= 6ry tit ibis ala<. <o«r:cauo<, or r<Port
a dul' Licew<tl Land Surveyor der theCIVIL
PROJECT
GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC.eyoadmp
ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS. LAND PLANNERS
�h—by
Al of.445
NORTH WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE, MN 55356
22-00) 952-413-4141
Cronber Minnesota Lieenea mbar 12165
r
1
JH
acP
k
€
s
x
r
E
z
0
0
0
:0
o
-
r
1
JH
o
-
-
x
=
a
❑
x
o
-
x
- ...-
�]
ALMA HOMES
DESIGN I BUILD I RENOVATE
GRONBERG RESIDENCE
e?m
o
28
2500SHADYWOOD ROADSUHE750
65 STUBBS BAY ROAD
ORONO.MN55331
6'260
WWWALMAHOMEAHOMESMN.COM
MN LICENSE-BC726074
ORONOMN
,
iU'+
°z
y
cu
m
n
�
LTJ
C
rMg
� e
N�
Egad
zoa� UiwN1&L&➢WNdtl
Y
ym
ra€fie oW�
o°e�
_��
w RluuRlxussFs
- x � "
w RLouRTRussrs
e
rFL
'
n
O
b
VJ
x
x
0
�]
ALMA HOMES
DESIGN I BUILD I RENOVATE
GRONBERG RESIDENCE
e?m
o
28
2500SHADYWOOD ROADSUHE'I50
65 STUBBS BAY ROAD
ORONO.MN55331
612-7W7860
WW LICENSE-BC726.COM
MN LICENSE xgC]260'!4
ORONO, MN
iU'+
°z
cu
� e
N�
Egad
zoa� UiwN1&L&➢WNdtl
CD
ElDam
AD
ag
-lyl
_j
FE -1
ER
nB
F1
i I 'T llr.,' r7,
V.
O
ro
ALMA HOMES
DESIGN I BUILD I RENOVATE E
GRONBERGRESIDENC
2500SHADWOO ROADSUTTE750 65 STUBBS BAY ROAD
ORO O.MN55331
WWW612-7W7860 ORONOMESMN.COM,MNcu
LICENSE -BC726074
2i --3
L
FF
Al�
O
ro
q
ALMA HOMES
DESIGN I BUILD I RENOVATE
GRONBERG RESIDENCE
e?m
28
2500SHADWOO ROADSUTTE750
65 STUBBS BAY ROAD
ORO O.MN55331
612-7W7860
,ALMAHOMESMN,G0
MNLICENSE -BC726074
ORONO,MN